Real Coffee with Scott Adams - December 15, 2022


Episode 1958 Scott Adams: The News Is Full Of Fakeness And Bad Opinions. Let's Have A Laugh


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 27 minutes

Words per Minute

141.72467

Word Count

12,461

Sentence Count

956

Misogynist Sentences

20

Hate Speech Sentences

30


Summary

The age of consent in the U.S. should be 12 years old for mental health services for minors, according to a far-left Democratic Congressman from Colorado. Plus, how to deal with your critics, and how to handle a bunch of fake news.


Transcript

00:00:00.880 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of civilization.
00:00:05.440 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams.
00:00:06.980 There's never been a finer thing that ever happened in your whole life.
00:00:10.340 And if you'd like to take it up a level, it's not hard.
00:00:13.860 All you need is a cup or mug or a glass, a tank or chalice or stein, a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:23.220 Fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:00:26.180 I like it.
00:00:28.060 I like coffee.
00:00:29.220 Stop doing funny memes while I'm trying to do this.
00:00:32.920 Over on the locals' platform, they can do photos in their comments.
00:00:38.840 You're killing me.
00:00:40.080 You're killing me.
00:00:41.400 All right, it's time now for the dopamine hit of the day, the unparalleled pleasure.
00:00:48.720 Go.
00:00:52.320 Oh, yeah.
00:00:56.180 Is the mug picture wrong?
00:00:57.640 Oh, you're right.
00:00:59.220 I just realized that the finger grip is a little bit wrong.
00:01:02.760 It should be a two-finger grip, two inside.
00:01:05.820 Yeah, good point.
00:01:06.460 Well, here's a little lesson on how to handle your critics.
00:01:14.020 Tech magnate Mark Andreessen wakes up to find that there's a meme going around in which there's like a competitive playoff kind of a grid.
00:01:27.360 And people are being asked to vote on the worst people in tech, the worst people in tech, and Mark Andreessen is one of the so-called competitors for the worst people in tech.
00:01:41.660 So he wakes up and sees this is trending on Twitter, and he replies, seriously, though, any day the communists are still in favor of voting is a good day.
00:01:52.480 Pretty good.
00:01:53.480 Pretty good.
00:01:54.480 Pretty good.
00:01:55.480 Pretty good.
00:01:57.480 Pretty good.
00:01:58.480 Pretty good.
00:01:59.480 Pretty good.
00:02:00.480 You know, the best you can hope for is that your retort is more clever than the attack.
00:02:05.820 And that's definitely more clever than the attack.
00:02:10.420 All right.
00:02:11.100 There is a thread by Cliff Sims, who I guess worked in the DNI under Trump.
00:02:18.200 And he tells this story about, he tells two stories about dealing with the press and how the press just won't listen.
00:02:25.800 You know, they come in with a narrative.
00:02:28.100 He's talking about Natasha, Bertrand in particular.
00:02:30.480 But people were asking Ratcliffe, the head of the DNI, when the Hunter laptop thing came out, the press was saying, some people were saying it's Russian disinformation.
00:02:44.580 And Ratcliffe, who would be the one person in the world most qualified to know if there's any evidence for Russian disinformation, said from the start, no, there's no evidence whatsoever it's Russian disinformation.
00:03:00.480 And then how did it get reported?
00:03:03.260 Well, you know, it might be Russian disinformation.
00:03:06.280 There's just nothing you can tell.
00:03:09.040 There's no expert.
00:03:10.400 There's no fact.
00:03:11.160 There's just nothing you can say to the media that will stop them from writing a biased thing.
00:03:16.980 But you have to see Cliff Sims' full thread.
00:03:20.920 It's in my Twitter feed this morning, if you want to find it.
00:03:23.600 Or you just go directly to Cliff Sims.
00:03:27.420 Fake news this morning, some of you might have seen.
00:03:30.060 There's some kind of House Oversight Committee hearing.
00:03:34.760 And Congressman Michael Cloud was talking to a representative in Colorado.
00:03:43.280 There was some witness who was testifying.
00:03:45.240 I think it was this morning, maybe yesterday.
00:03:47.280 And the witness said that for kids thinking about their gender confusion, that the age of consent for mental health therapy is 12.
00:04:03.980 In other words, if you're a 12-year-old, apparently at least within the school system, I think, maybe the medical system too, you can ask for mental health help.
00:04:15.380 But it's just the mental health part.
00:04:20.620 And apparently they have the right not to tell your parents.
00:04:23.600 Now, if there's anything dangerous going on, of course parents have to be notified immediately.
00:04:28.800 But just in terms of giving them therapy, I didn't know this, but the law is 12 years old.
00:04:33.900 I think it might be 16 in California.
00:04:36.560 I'm not so sure.
00:04:38.060 It might be different by state.
00:04:39.980 But here's the fake news part.
00:04:41.440 Congressman Michael Cloud tweets out,
00:04:44.760 In today's House Oversight Committee hearing, a far-left Democrat witness said that parents have no right to know if their kids are going through sex changes.
00:04:52.780 That never happened.
00:04:56.420 And then he tweets the person testifying who doesn't say that.
00:05:03.700 She talks about mental health therapy talking to him.
00:05:08.900 Now, you could argue whether they should be allowed to talk to a mental health expert at the age of 12 without parental consent.
00:05:16.460 That's a fair discussion.
00:05:19.760 But they're not talking about a 12-year-old.
00:05:24.460 Julian, read.
00:05:26.240 I'm just saying that he tweeted something that says the opposite.
00:05:29.700 In other words, he tweeted the actual witness.
00:05:32.600 I listened to the whole thing she said.
00:05:34.900 And she very clearly specified mental health therapy.
00:05:39.040 She never said a sex change operation a 12-year-old can get.
00:05:42.920 This is a terrible rumor.
00:05:45.420 This is really bad.
00:05:46.940 Because you realize that 40% of the people on the right will forever believe this happened.
00:05:52.640 There's nothing I can do to make people think this didn't happen.
00:05:56.160 This is like the drinking bleach hoax.
00:05:58.860 Once it's out there, it's just out there.
00:06:01.700 So now politics will be completely dominated by a fake belief that 12-year-olds can get a sex change operation without talking to their parents.
00:06:13.780 That's not true.
00:06:16.060 That's not true.
00:06:18.060 And, you know, there's a congressman tweeting it today.
00:06:22.480 All right.
00:06:22.780 And by the way, if it turns out I'm wrong about that, and a 12-year-old can get a sex change operation without their parents being involved,
00:06:32.500 if I'm wrong about that, we need to fix that, right?
00:06:37.880 Can we all agree?
00:06:39.880 There's no way that can stand.
00:06:42.120 That can't stand.
00:06:43.540 But it's not true.
00:06:45.240 So if anybody can, you know, make a case that that's true, let me know.
00:06:48.940 There's no way that's true.
00:06:50.000 All right.
00:06:54.440 So Musk has apparently, some people would say, reversed his position, but I don't think it's that clear.
00:07:01.500 On Twitter accounts that track the location of airplanes or people.
00:07:09.340 So if your Twitter account is dedicated to just saying where somebody's going to be,
00:07:14.360 specifically celebrities and famous people, then you will be banned on Twitter.
00:07:20.340 Now, prior to that, he had actually said explicitly that that would be okay.
00:07:24.920 But apparently he had some security concerns of his own, and it wouldn't be surprising if that influenced his opinion.
00:07:33.120 But he reports that, this is a Musk tweet, he said,
00:07:37.520 Last night, a car carrying Lil X.
00:07:40.500 Now, I don't know who Lil X is.
00:07:43.580 A rapper?
00:07:44.680 Famous rapper?
00:07:45.760 Maybe?
00:07:46.800 Lil X?
00:07:50.280 That's his son?
00:07:51.160 Oh, my goodness.
00:07:54.540 Okay.
00:07:56.080 I didn't realize it was his son.
00:07:57.780 Okay.
00:08:00.240 But was followed by a crazy stalker, thinking it was Elon, who later blocked the car from moving and climbed onto the hood.
00:08:09.980 And he's taking legal action against whoever, I don't know, somebody.
00:08:14.580 But what do you think about that?
00:08:20.160 Do you think that Musk reversed his opinion?
00:08:24.340 Or do you think he's just acting to block things that are obviously inciting violence?
00:08:29.340 Because here's what changed.
00:08:34.220 What changed was the environment.
00:08:37.200 Right?
00:08:37.680 When whoever was started tracking Musk's airplane, because I think that's maybe where it all started.
00:08:43.600 There was a Twitter account that would just say where his airplane was going.
00:08:47.220 That was before Musk was really targeted so much.
00:08:51.640 Because it was either when he was thinking about buying Twitter or hadn't yet.
00:08:56.360 But once he bought Twitter, his own personal security was a different situation.
00:09:04.340 And if his own personal security is a different situation, then telling the public where he's at could be physically quite dangerous.
00:09:14.340 Right?
00:09:14.440 So, do you think that if somebody is the type of person who could be targeted, and Musk is clearly that type of person,
00:09:27.260 do you think that it incites violence to simply track him and say, here he is at this time?
00:09:34.680 Does that incite violence?
00:09:38.640 It does accidentally.
00:09:41.340 Yeah.
00:09:41.640 It does not by intent.
00:09:43.000 Well, there could be intent.
00:09:45.940 I mean, you could imagine somebody having intent.
00:09:48.180 But I don't believe the original tracker had that intent.
00:09:52.040 But in terms of does it have that effect?
00:09:54.980 Absolutely.
00:09:57.060 Does it have the intention?
00:09:59.240 That's not an evidence.
00:10:00.880 But does it have the effect of inciting people because they know where you are and they're already mad?
00:10:06.640 Of course.
00:10:08.000 Absolutely.
00:10:08.480 Now, I heard some pushback saying that Musk was saying he would only ban you if he did things that are against the law.
00:10:17.780 Right?
00:10:18.680 Things that are against the law.
00:10:19.840 But is it against the law to tweet that somebody's airplane is at a certain airport?
00:10:28.400 No.
00:10:29.020 It's not against the law.
00:10:30.360 So, is Musk now being inconsistent because he says we won't do anything that's, you know, not against the law?
00:10:37.480 All right, well, here's the argument for him.
00:10:43.520 Inciting violence is illegal, isn't it?
00:10:46.660 Or is it?
00:10:48.380 Is inciting violence legal or illegal?
00:10:52.040 I thought it was illegal.
00:10:53.900 Maybe it depends where you are in the context.
00:10:56.720 But is he supposed to wait until somebody gets hurt?
00:11:01.100 Because that's when the law is broken when somebody gets hurt.
00:11:06.740 He's changing it before somebody gets hurt.
00:11:10.560 Is he compatible with the law or is he incompatible with the law?
00:11:15.620 He's saying if somebody does this, somebody might get hurt.
00:11:19.660 But he's stopping them from doing the crime.
00:11:22.740 But he's also stopping people from having information that would not be part of a crime.
00:11:27.760 So he's doing both.
00:11:31.100 All right.
00:11:35.440 What?
00:11:37.040 Why are you here, Sean?
00:11:43.780 Somebody's on here just to bother me.
00:11:46.480 Sean, can you just fuck off?
00:11:49.480 Like, I'll delete you after I'm done.
00:11:51.740 So you're not going to be on the platform when I'm done.
00:11:54.200 But I'm looking at your comments and you're just,
00:11:55.780 he signed up for my subscription service just to be an asshole to me, apparently.
00:12:01.100 So what the fuck is wrong with you, really?
00:12:05.240 Just get off the platform.
00:12:06.560 Could you quit today?
00:12:07.660 I'll get rid of you.
00:12:09.720 Let me make a note so I can get rid of you later.
00:12:14.720 Sorry.
00:12:15.520 I have to just do this.
00:12:18.660 All right.
00:12:18.960 Sean, that's the last time I'll put up with your fucking face.
00:12:22.780 God, fucking assholes.
00:12:24.000 All right.
00:12:33.560 Let's go back to the show.
00:12:39.420 All right.
00:12:40.020 Well, no, it's not a troll.
00:12:41.440 See, the problem with trolls are a very specific thing.
00:12:45.220 There are some people who are just broken and they need to hurt other people in public for whatever reason.
00:12:50.940 I mean, this person is just fucking broken.
00:12:53.400 So you're out of my life forever.
00:12:58.280 All right.
00:13:02.860 So one thing I learned in 2022, here's a little tip for you.
00:13:08.280 Would you like a tip on safety?
00:13:09.880 If you're the kind of person that somebody might want to kill, and, you know, there are lots of them, the kind of person that somebody might want to kill, it's a good idea to let somebody that you don't like that much borrow your car.
00:13:27.520 I think I've heard at least three stories this year of somebody who got attacked because they had a borrowed car.
00:13:34.900 Have you heard those same stories?
00:13:36.400 Like, I think I've seen, or three of them this year, right?
00:13:41.580 Wasn't there the, was it the Russian?
00:13:44.660 Maybe it was the Russian whose daughter blew up because she was borrowed the car.
00:13:48.860 And then there's a story about, something about the Beatles that I heard.
00:13:55.040 I think one of the, now there's some celebrity who lets somebody else borrow their high-end car and got in trouble.
00:14:02.300 Yeah, there's a whole bunch of stories like that.
00:14:03.880 But basically, if somebody's trying to kill you, let somebody that you don't like that much borrow your car.
00:14:11.000 That's, that's my advice.
00:14:13.680 All right, Trump said that he's going to make a major announcement today.
00:14:17.020 Does anybody have any guesses what that is?
00:14:19.120 He says that we need a superhero.
00:14:22.900 Now, do you think he's talking about himself?
00:14:26.020 We need a superhero?
00:14:27.340 Because that would be so cringy, it's hard to believe he's talking about himself.
00:14:35.220 Now, he did show a meme of himself as a superhero.
00:14:40.180 So it could be he was just referring to the meme, and it's not really directly related to the announcement.
00:14:46.160 So maybe the superhero thing is just a diversion, and it's just because there was a fun meme and has nothing to do with anything.
00:14:54.800 Is that what you think?
00:14:56.860 Do you see, you think the major announcement and the superhero thing are disconnected, right?
00:15:01.500 They're just two things that happen at the same time?
00:15:03.260 Because yesterday I was speculating that he was going to say Cary Lake had joined his team or was going to be his vice president pick or something.
00:15:13.940 Now, if he did that, it would basically just throw the chessboard on the floor, wouldn't it?
00:15:21.780 It's basically just the whole game is up at that point.
00:15:25.460 At that point, everything is up for grabs.
00:15:28.940 Because if he has just an ordinary vice president, he doesn't have anything.
00:15:34.220 I think it would be hard for him to win.
00:15:36.340 He's seeing some crushing polls, you know, with DeSantis easily beating him in the polls and stuff.
00:15:42.360 Yeah, somebody says it could be a Dean Cain-related announcement.
00:15:47.060 But would that be a major announcement?
00:15:49.580 Let's say Dean Cain joined his team in some capacity.
00:15:54.740 That would sound like we need a superhero.
00:15:58.400 Maybe it's something like that.
00:15:59.760 He's so good.
00:16:00.580 Trump is so good at making us curious.
00:16:04.160 He's always been doing this.
00:16:06.020 And it works every time.
00:16:07.160 I hate that it works on me.
00:16:08.560 But I'm actually genuinely curious what he's got going.
00:16:12.800 Dean Cain played Superman in a, I don't know, maybe 30 years ago version or something like that.
00:16:20.740 It was a long time ago.
00:16:21.820 Now, by tradition, I don't think there's any law about it.
00:16:30.600 But by tradition, presidents don't pick vice presidents until they're nominated, right?
00:16:36.380 That's the tradition.
00:16:38.060 But there's no reason for it, is there?
00:16:40.500 Is there any obstacle to doing it?
00:16:42.340 There's no downside.
00:16:44.160 There's only an upside if you pick the right person.
00:16:46.360 Adam West's already dead, yeah.
00:16:50.340 So, is Trump clever enough to know that he could regain the news cycle and maybe they can't keep Carrie Lake off of Twitter?
00:17:04.780 What about that?
00:17:05.620 If he picks his vice president, he can pick a vice president who is not banned on any social media.
00:17:13.020 And then he can have the vice president just tweet out his whole campaign.
00:17:18.140 That would be interesting, wouldn't it?
00:17:20.260 Now, the other possibility is that the announcement has something to do with truth social, but I doubt it.
00:17:28.720 I doubt it.
00:17:30.680 Now, I don't think it's a Dean Cain thing.
00:17:32.880 So, what would be big enough?
00:17:36.140 Because here's the thing.
00:17:37.060 I don't think Trump is likely to disappoint.
00:17:40.720 I don't think it's in his nature, Trump, to say there's something big and then roll out with something small.
00:17:47.920 Would you agree?
00:17:48.980 Would you agree that Trump would never say there's something big coming and then roll out with something small?
00:17:55.640 Right?
00:17:56.500 So, you know, he uses hyperbole.
00:17:59.360 So, he's always going to say it's bigger than it is.
00:18:01.000 But it's not going to be small.
00:18:03.380 So, what is there?
00:18:05.560 Yeah.
00:18:06.160 And he says we need a superhero, which makes me think it's something about a person.
00:18:11.300 Now, he might be the person.
00:18:13.340 But, I don't know, the smart play would be announcing Carrie Lake before you're supposed to.
00:18:20.160 Because the first thing that would happen is the news would jabber forever about how you're not supposed to name your vice president.
00:18:28.420 Right?
00:18:28.580 That's like free money.
00:18:31.000 Because it's so easy to talk about.
00:18:33.300 That's how you know it would be a story.
00:18:35.760 Everybody would talk about, oh, historically we haven't.
00:18:39.900 Here's the reason we don't.
00:18:41.900 But why did he do it?
00:18:43.520 Why is it different this time?
00:18:45.120 Is there something special about Carrie Lake that it makes sense?
00:18:48.360 Is there something special about the landscape of the news where it makes sense?
00:18:52.040 Is everything moving faster?
00:18:53.680 Is there really a thing called Trump time?
00:18:56.260 See what I mean?
00:18:56.820 You could talk endlessly.
00:18:59.780 It's not really even terribly important.
00:19:03.080 It's like a little tradition with no special backing to it.
00:19:09.640 So, if that's what he has in mind, it would be brilliant.
00:19:17.120 If it's not what he has in mind, it better be good.
00:19:20.440 It better be good.
00:19:22.260 Because, you know, he's teased it would be big.
00:19:24.600 And if he teases something big and doesn't come through,
00:19:29.100 now it's not going to be a lawsuit.
00:19:30.640 Because he said, oh, it could be.
00:19:34.880 It could be a lawsuit if you're sure that the superhero part
00:19:39.480 is not connected to what the announcement is.
00:19:43.120 I get it.
00:19:43.400 That's possible.
00:19:44.400 Yeah, I'll give you that.
00:19:45.200 That's possible.
00:19:46.400 But I don't feel like a lawsuit is like a big announcement.
00:19:51.420 Do you?
00:19:51.760 Like, would Trump say a lawsuit was a big announcement?
00:19:57.040 It's got to be people.
00:19:59.960 It's got to be a human...
00:20:02.820 There's something about a human being.
00:20:05.300 Like all...
00:20:06.220 It's like a glaring signal because it's Trump.
00:20:08.920 Trump doesn't make a big announcement about paperwork, does he?
00:20:14.120 You think Trump's going to make a big announcement about paperwork?
00:20:17.300 I don't think so.
00:20:20.080 A legal process?
00:20:21.960 That would be so counter to his instincts of, you know, being a good promoter
00:20:27.500 and what actually excites people.
00:20:30.500 All right.
00:20:32.460 Is anybody blown away, as I am, that we still don't agree as a country
00:20:37.760 whether the vaccinations were unambiguously a good idea
00:20:42.200 or unambiguously a bad idea.
00:20:45.200 Now, I don't want to hear anything about myocarditis in young men.
00:20:52.320 Stipulate it.
00:20:53.880 I'll even stipulate it.
00:20:56.980 Can I beg you?
00:20:58.500 Can I beg you not to mention it because we all already know it?
00:21:02.660 I'm just begging you.
00:21:03.860 Just don't say it.
00:21:04.700 We all know it, okay?
00:21:07.480 There is no conversation about young men.
00:21:12.120 That part, we can agree on, right?
00:21:14.260 Are you right?
00:21:15.180 But the rest of the people, all right,
00:21:18.140 I will stipulate that the data is sketchy for young men.
00:21:23.320 Okay?
00:21:23.780 Sipulate it.
00:21:27.060 Okay, I stipulate that so you don't have to say it.
00:21:29.440 But let's just say for older people.
00:21:37.840 And I would be curious just to see where you're at right now.
00:21:41.020 Now, my current opinion is how would I know?
00:21:44.140 That's my current opinion.
00:21:45.800 How would I know?
00:21:46.440 So I think there are three opinions and two of them are unsupported.
00:21:51.840 If we can agree on the stipulated part,
00:21:57.500 that young men seem to have a greater risk with a vaccination.
00:22:01.040 Everybody seems to know that now.
00:22:03.240 But for not that group, for the people older,
00:22:07.580 older than that, just older, forget about kids.
00:22:10.820 That's a whole different conversation.
00:22:12.660 But for the older population,
00:22:14.660 how many of you think that the vaccinations were more good than bad
00:22:18.080 or more bad than good?
00:22:19.660 Just for the older people.
00:22:23.360 Older only.
00:22:24.640 Older only.
00:22:27.620 Oh, wow, I'm surprised.
00:22:30.540 I'm very surprised.
00:22:33.880 Yeah, there's a big difference between the locals and the YouTube people.
00:22:39.560 YouTube says more bad than good,
00:22:42.160 and locals is more good than bad.
00:22:44.760 But anyway, either way, it proves my point.
00:22:47.340 How in the world could we be here
00:22:49.380 and not know that?
00:22:52.660 I mean, how could it be?
00:22:56.200 Is there anything more important than that?
00:22:58.800 Like, literally, how could we be at this point
00:23:00.720 and still disagree
00:23:02.320 about whether the vaccinations worked or didn't
00:23:05.920 for older people?
00:23:07.860 Only older people.
00:23:09.340 Only older people.
00:23:11.120 I have to say that every time.
00:23:13.620 How is that even possible?
00:23:14.600 Now, so the three opinions are,
00:23:20.160 it was the so-called vaccine...
00:23:22.480 Oh, here's the other thing.
00:23:24.320 Can I do another stipulation?
00:23:26.460 One more stipulation.
00:23:27.660 I never, ever, ever want to hear you tell me
00:23:35.180 that you shouldn't call them vaccinations
00:23:37.900 because they don't stop the spread.
00:23:40.720 Everybody knows that.
00:23:42.560 Everybody knows that.
00:23:44.240 I will stipulate it.
00:23:45.900 If you'll please, please stop saying it.
00:23:48.160 I know!
00:23:50.400 Simulated.
00:23:54.400 Ah, good.
00:23:55.820 Good stuff.
00:23:59.300 So I was listening to a little clip
00:24:01.920 by comedian Dana Gould.
00:24:04.040 It was very funny.
00:24:04.940 One of my favorites.
00:24:05.640 But his routine was...
00:24:09.000 It's interesting
00:24:09.760 because in his bubble,
00:24:11.580 he said,
00:24:12.700 basically,
00:24:14.140 that how could anybody be against
00:24:16.040 what he called vaccinations,
00:24:18.500 which I stipulate,
00:24:19.840 I stipulate,
00:24:20.760 I stipulate that when he used the word vaccination,
00:24:24.160 I stipulate
00:24:24.800 that they don't actually stop the spread of transmission.
00:24:30.860 It's just something he said.
00:24:32.320 And he said,
00:24:35.480 how in the world
00:24:37.100 are we,
00:24:39.560 let's say,
00:24:40.640 going against the experts?
00:24:42.100 I'm paraphrasing.
00:24:44.020 Basically, he said,
00:24:45.320 everything that we do in life,
00:24:48.180 we're trusting experts,
00:24:49.460 so why is this different?
00:24:51.440 He says,
00:24:52.280 I use my zipper.
00:24:54.300 I don't know how that works,
00:24:55.660 but I use it anyway.
00:24:57.500 So his view was,
00:24:59.560 everything
00:25:00.040 that you do
00:25:02.540 is because some expert told you it was okay.
00:25:05.880 It's no different.
00:25:07.140 So why wouldn't you do the vaccinations?
00:25:10.020 Totally,
00:25:10.660 totally a good point, right?
00:25:12.580 And then he mocked his brother
00:25:14.100 for not getting vaccinated
00:25:16.140 because his brother said
00:25:17.260 he doesn't know
00:25:18.460 what goes into those vaccinations.
00:25:20.540 Like,
00:25:20.820 he doesn't know how that works.
00:25:23.180 And then Dana said,
00:25:25.380 again,
00:25:26.080 paraphrasing,
00:25:27.380 that you don't know how anything works.
00:25:28.920 Like,
00:25:29.360 it's a crazy point.
00:25:30.600 Just because his brother
00:25:31.420 doesn't know how that works,
00:25:32.920 his brother doesn't know
00:25:33.780 how anything works
00:25:34.520 that's,
00:25:34.960 you know,
00:25:35.240 technical.
00:25:36.480 So how do you make any decisions?
00:25:40.200 And
00:25:40.660 I tweeted that
00:25:43.320 and I made the following observation.
00:25:46.580 Who is more likely
00:25:48.160 to screw you?
00:25:50.760 Somebody who knows more than you
00:25:52.500 about the topic
00:25:53.340 or someone who knows
00:25:55.020 a lot less than you
00:25:56.200 about the topic.
00:25:57.940 Over the course of your life,
00:26:00.260 have you been more screwed
00:26:01.720 by people who knew more than you?
00:26:04.680 Let's say,
00:26:06.020 crypto?
00:26:07.740 Crypto would be a good current
00:26:09.920 kind of thing.
00:26:11.280 Why do you think that
00:26:13.100 Sam Bankman-Fried
00:26:15.060 could build,
00:26:16.480 you know,
00:26:17.200 his company FTX
00:26:18.360 and get away with it?
00:26:20.440 Because he knew
00:26:21.380 more than you know.
00:26:24.120 He's the expert.
00:26:26.480 Right?
00:26:28.980 A hundred percent
00:26:30.080 of the people
00:26:30.880 who fuck you
00:26:31.720 are the ones
00:26:32.740 who know more than you.
00:26:33.660 That's how they do it.
00:26:35.700 Do you know
00:26:36.140 when people
00:26:36.680 do, like,
00:26:38.280 financial scams on you?
00:26:40.100 Or they, you know,
00:26:41.220 do insider trading?
00:26:42.960 Is the insider trading
00:26:44.280 happening because
00:26:44.940 they know less than you?
00:26:46.580 No, it's because
00:26:47.380 they know more than you.
00:26:49.320 That's how it works.
00:26:51.020 It's the knowing
00:26:51.760 more than you
00:26:52.420 that's the whole trick.
00:26:54.260 Everything depends
00:26:55.060 on them knowing
00:26:55.640 more than you.
00:26:56.220 They can't fool you
00:26:57.120 if you know
00:26:58.040 more than them.
00:26:59.840 Okay?
00:27:00.540 I don't know
00:27:01.360 how more clear
00:27:02.020 that could be.
00:27:03.500 The people who know
00:27:04.380 less than me
00:27:05.640 almost never fool me.
00:27:09.360 Do you know why?
00:27:10.620 Because they know
00:27:11.540 less than I know.
00:27:13.940 That's why.
00:27:16.000 It's only the people
00:27:17.380 who know more than you
00:27:18.280 in politics,
00:27:19.600 in economics,
00:27:21.140 you know,
00:27:21.560 every form of finance,
00:27:24.260 crypto,
00:27:25.180 everything.
00:27:26.140 It's only the people
00:27:27.300 who know more than you
00:27:28.060 that are screwing you.
00:27:30.320 Doc Anarchy
00:27:31.180 has another
00:27:31.840 great thread
00:27:32.740 that actually
00:27:33.260 you'd need to be
00:27:34.040 subscribing to his
00:27:35.160 sub-stack
00:27:36.320 to see it all.
00:27:37.740 But he's going after
00:27:38.760 the AMA
00:27:39.740 and the medical
00:27:40.780 and medical studies.
00:27:44.180 And once you see
00:27:45.620 how often
00:27:46.220 the people
00:27:47.300 who know more than you
00:27:48.260 have intentionally lied
00:27:49.980 to get a drug passed,
00:27:52.840 you would have to have
00:27:53.800 no context
00:27:54.700 in your life whatsoever
00:27:55.760 to think that
00:27:57.020 vaccinations are safe
00:27:58.820 because
00:27:59.820 the people
00:28:00.960 who know more
00:28:01.420 than you told you
00:28:02.100 they were.
00:28:03.020 The worst reason.
00:28:05.120 Now,
00:28:05.400 there might be.
00:28:05.920 I'm very explicitly
00:28:08.440 not giving you
00:28:09.920 my opinion
00:28:10.460 on whether
00:28:11.080 these so-called
00:28:12.440 vaccinations
00:28:13.060 that don't vaccinate,
00:28:15.420 whether they're
00:28:16.200 more good than bad.
00:28:18.420 How would I know?
00:28:20.260 I mean,
00:28:20.560 seriously,
00:28:21.060 how would I know?
00:28:22.440 And somebody's going to say,
00:28:23.480 oh,
00:28:23.700 do your own research,
00:28:24.760 Scott.
00:28:25.040 It's all out there.
00:28:26.120 No,
00:28:26.440 it isn't.
00:28:27.940 Nothing I believe
00:28:28.860 is out there
00:28:29.440 because everything
00:28:30.320 out there
00:28:30.720 would be
00:28:31.200 put together
00:28:32.220 by who?
00:28:33.920 What would be
00:28:34.620 a general description
00:28:35.640 of all the people
00:28:37.140 who put together
00:28:37.740 those studies
00:28:38.380 you think I should
00:28:39.100 look into?
00:28:40.020 Like a general
00:28:40.900 description of them.
00:28:42.000 Are they people
00:28:43.060 who know more
00:28:43.640 than I do?
00:28:45.160 Right.
00:28:46.200 So I can't check
00:28:47.180 their work.
00:28:48.300 I can't check
00:28:48.940 their work
00:28:49.320 because they know
00:28:49.800 more than I do.
00:28:50.740 Now,
00:28:51.020 I can check
00:28:51.440 some of them.
00:28:52.720 I mean,
00:28:52.920 some of them
00:28:53.360 just are like
00:28:54.000 screamingly
00:28:54.700 obviously bullshit,
00:28:56.220 but I can't check
00:28:57.060 all of them
00:28:57.660 because they know
00:28:59.080 more than I do.
00:29:00.520 Dana Gould.
00:29:02.920 All right.
00:29:07.560 I'm thinking
00:29:08.220 of creating
00:29:08.940 a sort of
00:29:11.120 a version of me
00:29:12.780 that's like
00:29:13.200 the dark version.
00:29:15.860 I can't,
00:29:16.220 you know,
00:29:16.440 it's like
00:29:16.660 everything like me,
00:29:17.780 but it's like
00:29:18.140 opposite me.
00:29:19.680 Like wherever
00:29:20.220 I have a socially
00:29:21.620 appropriate opinion,
00:29:23.180 you know,
00:29:23.460 dark Scott
00:29:24.100 would be the one
00:29:25.280 that's the opposite
00:29:25.860 because over on Reddit
00:29:27.980 there's a version
00:29:29.520 of me that's
00:29:30.040 dark Scott
00:29:30.760 and I can tell
00:29:32.200 when they come
00:29:32.660 over to Twitter
00:29:33.260 because they all
00:29:34.240 have the same
00:29:34.680 misinformation.
00:29:36.380 So over on Reddit
00:29:37.120 they believe
00:29:37.820 I was pro-mask.
00:29:39.880 I actually led
00:29:40.980 a anti-mask
00:29:42.120 campaign.
00:29:44.420 They think
00:29:45.100 I'm pro-vaccination.
00:29:47.100 I delayed
00:29:47.940 as long as I could
00:29:48.920 until I wanted
00:29:49.640 a vacation,
00:29:50.680 got the minimum
00:29:51.420 I needed
00:29:51.900 for the vacation
00:29:52.640 and never looked back.
00:29:54.420 So that's
00:29:54.900 pro-vaccination.
00:29:56.500 Do I think
00:29:56.960 the vaccinations
00:29:57.560 helped me?
00:29:58.480 I don't know.
00:29:59.760 I just know
00:30:00.380 I had a good
00:30:00.760 vacation.
00:30:01.800 That's all I know.
00:30:03.060 I don't know
00:30:03.480 anything else.
00:30:04.460 I had to make
00:30:05.060 a choice.
00:30:06.820 Cost-benefit,
00:30:08.080 no information.
00:30:09.080 I just made
00:30:09.540 the one where
00:30:09.920 I could have
00:30:10.200 a good vacation.
00:30:13.200 So there,
00:30:14.500 and then
00:30:14.940 what was
00:30:16.120 the other one?
00:30:18.440 Oh,
00:30:19.180 also on Reddit
00:30:20.180 they believe
00:30:20.860 that I'm in
00:30:21.400 favor of
00:30:22.140 digital passports.
00:30:25.140 So,
00:30:25.660 so Dark Scott
00:30:26.640 is in favor
00:30:27.260 of digital passports,
00:30:29.560 masks,
00:30:29.980 and vaccinations
00:30:30.800 and I promoted
00:30:31.680 all of those things.
00:30:33.260 All opposite.
00:30:34.580 All opposite.
00:30:35.960 None of that's true.
00:30:37.340 Now,
00:30:37.660 on Twitter
00:30:38.160 mostly people
00:30:38.940 know that
00:30:39.580 but when the people,
00:30:41.180 there's a bunch
00:30:41.960 of trolls
00:30:42.360 coming over,
00:30:42.900 I think it's because
00:30:43.700 I'm not positive
00:30:45.020 but when I started
00:30:46.740 hitting TikTok hard,
00:30:48.680 I started getting
00:30:49.380 a lot of trolls
00:30:50.160 on unrelated topics
00:30:51.720 and one of,
00:30:53.600 and one of the
00:30:54.580 consistent ones,
00:30:56.840 I think they're
00:30:57.200 from Reddit
00:30:57.640 but they could be
00:30:58.260 just Chinese trolls.
00:30:59.740 One of the
00:31:00.260 consistent ones
00:31:01.180 is a tweet
00:31:02.700 in which I was
00:31:03.840 questioning people
00:31:06.460 on digital passports
00:31:07.900 for vaccinations
00:31:08.660 which are not
00:31:09.980 vaccinations really.
00:31:11.620 I'm going to
00:31:12.220 stipulate
00:31:12.660 that they're not
00:31:14.080 actual vaccinations.
00:31:15.060 don't want to
00:31:19.760 start any rumors.
00:31:21.360 So,
00:31:22.940 I wonder
00:31:24.940 if that's China.
00:31:26.980 Is it a coincidence
00:31:27.980 I'm talking about
00:31:29.120 cancelling TikTok
00:31:30.020 and then suddenly
00:31:30.940 trolls with all
00:31:32.380 the same message
00:31:33.180 are hitting me?
00:31:34.220 Now,
00:31:34.520 here's my take
00:31:35.680 on digital passports
00:31:36.820 and here's why
00:31:37.880 it confused people.
00:31:38.680 I talk about
00:31:40.200 both sides
00:31:40.740 of every issue.
00:31:42.120 If you talk about
00:31:43.120 both sides
00:31:43.600 of every issue
00:31:44.220 somebody can
00:31:45.340 just delete
00:31:46.420 the conversation
00:31:47.880 and take one side
00:31:48.940 of it and say
00:31:49.300 that's who you are.
00:31:50.340 So,
00:31:50.600 that's what happens
00:31:51.040 on Reddit
00:31:51.560 but I think
00:31:53.200 that's maybe
00:31:53.840 just Chinese trolls.
00:31:55.180 I don't know.
00:31:56.060 But here's my take
00:31:56.900 on digital passports.
00:31:58.880 Whether it's for
00:31:59.700 vaccinations
00:32:01.060 which I stipulate
00:32:02.800 are not actually
00:32:05.640 vaccinations.
00:32:06.680 It's a misleading word.
00:32:08.680 stipulated.
00:32:15.460 Here's why people
00:32:16.340 think I'm in favor
00:32:17.260 of digital passports.
00:32:18.940 Because I've said
00:32:19.760 do you know
00:32:21.340 they can do
00:32:21.880 all of that to you?
00:32:22.960 They can track
00:32:23.540 everywhere you are
00:32:24.460 right now
00:32:25.560 and they can turn off
00:32:27.160 all your finances
00:32:27.960 anytime they want.
00:32:30.380 What do you think
00:32:31.180 happened to SBF?
00:32:33.740 The FTX CEO?
00:32:35.240 Do you think
00:32:37.040 they knew where he was?
00:32:38.680 Yes.
00:32:39.860 They did.
00:32:41.100 Do you think
00:32:41.620 they could turn off
00:32:42.440 his banking?
00:32:44.120 Yes.
00:32:47.540 The government
00:32:48.460 just has to care
00:32:49.360 about you.
00:32:49.940 That's all.
00:32:51.040 They simply have
00:32:52.000 to care about you
00:32:52.960 and they can do
00:32:53.800 anything they want.
00:32:54.880 You know they can
00:32:55.460 send people to your
00:32:56.240 house with guns, right?
00:32:57.900 They can drag you
00:32:58.600 out of your house
00:32:59.100 put you in a little cell.
00:33:00.760 They can do
00:33:01.280 anything they want.
00:33:02.800 Now, would it be
00:33:03.760 inappropriate, illegal?
00:33:05.080 Yeah.
00:33:08.460 Yeah.
00:33:08.940 But they have
00:33:09.360 all those tools.
00:33:10.740 So if you give them
00:33:11.720 and here's what
00:33:13.400 people said.
00:33:13.940 They said,
00:33:14.260 okay Scott,
00:33:14.900 I get that they can
00:33:16.580 you know
00:33:17.260 for all practical
00:33:18.620 purposes
00:33:19.180 they can track you
00:33:20.080 everywhere
00:33:20.480 for all practical
00:33:21.680 purposes.
00:33:22.380 Yeah.
00:33:22.580 January 6th people
00:33:23.440 already
00:33:24.900 and they can also
00:33:25.800 turn off your banking
00:33:26.740 for all practical
00:33:28.240 purposes.
00:33:29.020 But you don't want
00:33:29.920 to make the mistake
00:33:30.580 of making it easy,
00:33:31.460 right?
00:33:33.340 So that's the pushback.
00:33:35.060 No, if you make it
00:33:35.760 easier they're going
00:33:36.500 to use it more.
00:33:37.940 Right?
00:33:39.620 Anybody agree with that?
00:33:41.180 If you make it a
00:33:42.300 digital passport
00:33:43.020 and they can just
00:33:43.740 push the one button
00:33:44.700 and you just disappear
00:33:46.200 from the grid
00:33:46.900 that's worse.
00:33:49.100 Right?
00:33:50.600 Now,
00:33:51.820 you know what's wrong
00:33:52.560 with that, right?
00:33:53.420 Let me tell you
00:33:54.000 what's wrong with that.
00:33:56.040 The person who is
00:33:57.180 capable of making
00:33:58.080 that decision
00:33:58.800 about you
00:33:59.380 they don't push
00:34:01.300 the button.
00:34:03.000 They don't have
00:34:04.120 like a dashboard
00:34:04.880 at their big old desk
00:34:06.280 and they're sitting
00:34:07.140 there like
00:34:07.520 I don't like that tweet
00:34:09.180 that Adams just sent
00:34:10.300 Adams, Adams, Adams
00:34:12.200 there's the Adams button
00:34:13.180 boom, you're gone.
00:34:15.600 You think the person
00:34:16.320 who makes the decision
00:34:17.220 pushes the button?
00:34:19.120 No.
00:34:20.200 They say to an underling
00:34:21.500 make this person
00:34:23.380 go away
00:34:23.940 and then the underling
00:34:25.800 does extra work
00:34:26.840 but does the boss
00:34:28.280 care?
00:34:29.380 No.
00:34:30.640 The boss doesn't care.
00:34:32.640 Do you think the
00:34:33.320 I don't know
00:34:34.420 district attorney
00:34:35.700 or whoever
00:34:36.260 is going to be
00:34:36.940 tracking and
00:34:37.980 turning off
00:34:39.200 somebody's resources
00:34:40.520 do you think
00:34:41.140 the district attorney
00:34:41.940 does it himself?
00:34:43.800 No.
00:34:44.720 Some underling
00:34:45.640 puts the paperwork
00:34:46.800 together to
00:34:47.500 do whatever
00:34:48.320 needs to be done.
00:34:49.540 So I don't think
00:34:50.340 it makes any difference.
00:34:53.300 I don't.
00:34:54.740 I think they can
00:34:55.360 turn off anything
00:34:56.260 they can track you
00:34:57.100 anywhere.
00:34:57.460 It's a very
00:34:58.880 small difference.
00:35:00.120 Now, did that
00:35:01.100 sound like I'm
00:35:01.720 in favor of
00:35:02.340 digital passports?
00:35:04.280 Did it?
00:35:06.120 I think it's
00:35:06.940 fair to say that
00:35:07.660 if you had
00:35:08.020 digital passports
00:35:08.920 for anything
00:35:09.540 it would provide
00:35:10.920 you some
00:35:11.320 conveniences.
00:35:11.940 It would take
00:35:14.040 away a little
00:35:14.840 bit of freedom
00:35:15.380 because you write
00:35:16.620 and make it
00:35:17.160 like a little
00:35:17.760 bit easier
00:35:18.280 but the
00:35:19.980 difference is
00:35:20.600 so trivial.
00:35:22.240 It's probably
00:35:22.580 a trivial
00:35:22.980 difference.
00:35:23.980 Now, did I
00:35:26.640 say I'm in
00:35:27.140 favor of it?
00:35:28.160 Did you hear me
00:35:28.720 say I'm in
00:35:29.100 favor of
00:35:29.540 digital passports?
00:35:30.740 No.
00:35:31.560 I just said
00:35:32.080 what is the
00:35:32.540 potential risk
00:35:33.360 and the
00:35:33.620 potential upside?
00:35:34.760 I just
00:35:35.340 described it.
00:35:36.540 I simply
00:35:37.080 described it.
00:35:37.860 That's it.
00:35:40.380 So I can't
00:35:42.180 call myself
00:35:42.680 Dark Atoms
00:35:43.420 because there's
00:35:44.520 a movie out
00:35:44.980 called Black
00:35:45.520 Atom.
00:35:45.860 Very confusing.
00:35:48.180 You know,
00:35:48.400 The Rock
00:35:48.760 has a movie
00:35:49.200 out.
00:35:50.060 So I can't
00:35:50.600 be Black
00:35:51.040 Atoms.
00:35:52.240 That would
00:35:52.540 be confusing.
00:35:54.160 So I guess
00:35:54.700 I'll have to
00:35:55.000 hold off on
00:35:55.500 that.
00:35:58.140 What else
00:35:58.780 has happened?
00:36:02.580 You know,
00:36:03.260 Rubio and
00:36:04.600 a couple of
00:36:05.280 Congress people
00:36:06.020 are trying to
00:36:06.880 stop TikTok
00:36:08.580 to ban it.
00:36:10.280 And Rubio
00:36:10.740 was talking
00:36:11.140 on Tucker's
00:36:11.680 show about
00:36:12.060 that.
00:36:12.840 And to
00:36:14.040 Rubio's
00:36:14.560 credit,
00:36:14.960 allow me
00:36:16.180 to give
00:36:16.560 Senator Rubio
00:36:18.200 a little
00:36:18.500 compliment,
00:36:20.040 he was
00:36:20.500 able to
00:36:21.680 describe the
00:36:22.420 risk of
00:36:22.860 TikTok
00:36:23.160 accurately.
00:36:25.300 He described
00:36:26.180 it not only
00:36:27.460 in terms of
00:36:28.160 the privacy
00:36:28.800 because they
00:36:29.220 collect all
00:36:29.700 the information.
00:36:30.900 That's only
00:36:31.700 part of the
00:36:32.160 risk and
00:36:32.600 maybe the
00:36:33.020 smaller part.
00:36:34.280 He accurately
00:36:35.240 explained that
00:36:37.800 they could
00:36:39.160 use it to
00:36:39.540 influence and
00:36:40.280 probably did.
00:36:41.600 And he had
00:36:42.080 an anecdote
00:36:42.520 of where they
00:36:43.180 probably did.
00:36:44.080 But one of
00:36:44.440 the anecdotes
00:36:44.960 is true or
00:36:45.420 not, it
00:36:46.720 demonstrates
00:36:47.140 that it's
00:36:47.660 a thing
00:36:48.000 they can
00:36:48.340 do very
00:36:49.460 easily.
00:36:50.780 Now, let
00:36:52.280 me tell you
00:36:52.640 why this is
00:36:53.140 really clever.
00:36:54.460 And something's
00:36:54.960 going to happen
00:36:55.460 here really
00:36:56.820 soon.
00:36:58.200 Have you
00:36:58.880 ever heard
00:36:59.380 anybody argue
00:37:00.100 for keeping
00:37:00.900 TikTok?
00:37:02.860 Like a
00:37:03.720 person in
00:37:04.860 Congress?
00:37:05.900 Any
00:37:06.220 politician?
00:37:07.380 Any
00:37:07.540 Congress?
00:37:07.880 No.
00:37:08.700 Not one.
00:37:10.140 Not one.
00:37:11.800 And Tucker
00:37:12.560 said, do you
00:37:13.220 think you
00:37:13.500 have enough
00:37:13.860 Democrat
00:37:14.280 votes?
00:37:15.600 And I
00:37:15.920 sat there
00:37:16.320 watching that
00:37:16.820 and saying,
00:37:17.700 what?
00:37:18.780 You have
00:37:19.360 them all.
00:37:21.160 There's no
00:37:21.800 Democrat vote
00:37:22.420 you don't
00:37:22.740 have.
00:37:23.420 There's not a
00:37:24.000 single person
00:37:24.720 who's on the
00:37:25.260 other side.
00:37:26.660 And then I
00:37:27.100 said to
00:37:27.400 myself, are
00:37:28.640 they really
00:37:29.040 going to vote
00:37:29.460 against it?
00:37:30.660 Just because
00:37:31.300 there's a
00:37:32.540 Democrat, it's a
00:37:35.180 bipartisan bill.
00:37:36.040 Are the
00:37:37.280 Democrats going
00:37:37.960 to vote
00:37:38.260 against a
00:37:38.720 bipartisan
00:37:39.160 bill because
00:37:40.680 a Republican
00:37:41.340 likes it?
00:37:42.360 But it's
00:37:42.900 also bipartisan?
00:37:45.240 So here's
00:37:46.100 what I think
00:37:46.560 is going to
00:37:46.920 happen.
00:37:47.880 We're going
00:37:48.540 to find out
00:37:49.180 who China
00:37:49.780 owns.
00:37:51.740 For the
00:37:52.500 first time,
00:37:53.160 we're going
00:37:53.420 to have
00:37:53.640 unambiguous
00:37:54.480 evidence.
00:37:55.820 I would say
00:37:56.320 proof.
00:37:57.580 Because
00:37:58.100 literally,
00:37:59.080 there's no
00:37:59.360 other argument.
00:38:00.740 If anybody
00:38:01.800 votes against
00:38:02.520 this bill and
00:38:04.300 doesn't have
00:38:05.020 some clever
00:38:05.600 reason that
00:38:06.080 you haven't
00:38:06.340 heard yet,
00:38:06.820 there might
00:38:07.080 be some
00:38:07.360 clever reason
00:38:08.040 that I
00:38:08.820 haven't heard
00:38:09.200 yet, but
00:38:10.020 if somebody
00:38:10.400 votes against
00:38:11.000 it and
00:38:11.260 doesn't give
00:38:11.700 you a reason,
00:38:12.820 they're owned
00:38:13.240 by China.
00:38:14.640 No fucking
00:38:15.220 doubt about
00:38:15.720 it.
00:38:17.680 Check my
00:38:19.020 reasoning.
00:38:20.360 Check my
00:38:20.960 reasoning,
00:38:21.420 because this
00:38:21.760 is a big
00:38:22.580 accusation.
00:38:25.000 There's no
00:38:25.860 counter-argument.
00:38:28.240 Nobody's ever
00:38:28.920 offered one.
00:38:30.020 The news has
00:38:30.640 never reported
00:38:31.300 one.
00:38:32.620 And even
00:38:33.020 when they talk
00:38:33.620 about the
00:38:33.960 bill, it's
00:38:35.020 bipartisan.
00:38:35.600 And neither
00:38:36.820 of them are
00:38:37.760 aware of
00:38:38.240 anybody who
00:38:38.640 has a
00:38:38.860 different
00:38:39.060 opinion.
00:38:40.080 There's no
00:38:41.020 awareness of
00:38:42.220 any different
00:38:43.700 opinion.
00:38:45.980 For the
00:38:46.740 first time,
00:38:47.880 we'll know
00:38:48.700 for fucking
00:38:49.540 sure who
00:38:51.120 the traitors
00:38:51.640 are.
00:38:53.120 We're going
00:38:53.760 to know for
00:38:54.180 sure.
00:38:55.880 I'm not
00:38:56.620 wrong.
00:38:57.640 We're actually
00:38:58.400 going to find
00:38:58.940 out who the
00:38:59.440 traitors are.
00:39:00.660 Because I
00:39:01.600 think if
00:39:02.140 they're bought
00:39:02.520 off, they're
00:39:02.960 still going to
00:39:03.360 have to vote
00:39:03.740 for China.
00:39:04.240 And it's
00:39:06.000 going to be
00:39:06.280 right there.
00:39:08.120 It's going
00:39:08.460 to be right
00:39:08.800 there.
00:39:10.880 And, you
00:39:11.300 know, some
00:39:11.560 people say
00:39:12.040 Mitch, because
00:39:12.840 his wife is
00:39:14.000 Chinese-American.
00:39:16.180 I think that's
00:39:17.040 both unfair and
00:39:18.180 also, let's keep
00:39:19.040 an eye on
00:39:19.440 him.
00:39:21.600 It's racist and
00:39:22.760 unfair to
00:39:24.040 assume that,
00:39:24.660 you know,
00:39:25.120 McConnell is
00:39:25.640 going to be in
00:39:26.060 the tank for
00:39:26.620 China because
00:39:27.260 his wife has
00:39:28.260 some connection.
00:39:28.780 Yeah, I
00:39:29.720 know it's a
00:39:30.200 Taiwanese
00:39:30.520 connection.
00:39:31.420 I understand
00:39:32.060 the difference.
00:39:33.840 But I
00:39:35.740 don't think
00:39:36.000 that's fair.
00:39:37.620 But on
00:39:37.960 the common
00:39:39.620 sense, well,
00:39:41.580 let me separate
00:39:42.460 it.
00:39:43.640 As a citizen
00:39:44.860 of the United
00:39:45.420 States who
00:39:46.020 loves his
00:39:46.500 Constitution and
00:39:47.380 says everybody's
00:39:48.100 innocent until
00:39:48.620 proven guilty,
00:39:49.820 it's totally
00:39:50.440 unfair to
00:39:52.260 think that
00:39:53.000 Mitch is in
00:39:53.780 the tank for
00:39:54.860 China because
00:39:55.500 his wife,
00:39:56.540 who's Taiwanese,
00:39:57.320 or has a
00:39:58.700 Taiwanese
00:39:58.960 connection.
00:40:00.220 Totally unfair.
00:40:01.840 But in the
00:40:02.560 common sense
00:40:03.240 world, which
00:40:04.600 is a different
00:40:05.060 world, right,
00:40:06.340 there's the
00:40:06.720 Constitution,
00:40:07.520 what's right,
00:40:08.500 and how do
00:40:08.840 you want to,
00:40:10.140 you know, what
00:40:10.400 kind of society
00:40:11.140 do you want to
00:40:11.620 build?
00:40:12.720 In that world,
00:40:14.980 don't come
00:40:15.580 close to this
00:40:16.220 topic, right?
00:40:17.240 That's off base.
00:40:18.820 But in the
00:40:19.300 real world, people
00:40:19.980 are influenced
00:40:20.860 by their spouse.
00:40:23.020 There's no
00:40:23.580 exception to that.
00:40:25.460 You don't think
00:40:26.200 Trump was at
00:40:26.820 least a
00:40:27.200 little bit
00:40:27.620 influenced by
00:40:28.220 Melania
00:40:28.660 sometimes.
00:40:29.780 I mean, I
00:40:30.080 don't know
00:40:30.360 what topics,
00:40:31.200 but of
00:40:31.620 course he
00:40:31.940 was.
00:40:32.520 You can't
00:40:33.060 not be
00:40:33.520 influenced by
00:40:34.060 your spouse.
00:40:35.220 That's not
00:40:35.660 a thing.
00:40:37.160 So you've
00:40:37.760 got to keep
00:40:38.040 an eye on
00:40:38.580 him, but
00:40:39.600 I think it's
00:40:39.960 unfair to
00:40:40.460 just assume
00:40:41.220 there's
00:40:41.420 something bad
00:40:41.920 going on
00:40:42.300 there.
00:40:44.720 All right,
00:40:46.100 DeSantis
00:40:46.480 picks up the
00:40:47.200 free money
00:40:47.700 again.
00:40:49.440 So Florida
00:40:50.020 is going to
00:40:50.720 hold the
00:40:51.180 medical
00:40:51.560 establishment
00:40:52.180 accountable,
00:40:53.100 says DeSantis.
00:40:54.480 So he's
00:40:54.820 got a grand
00:40:55.500 jury that's
00:40:57.000 going to
00:40:57.260 investigate
00:40:57.800 mRNA shots
00:40:58.940 and big
00:40:59.640 pharma,
00:41:00.420 and they're
00:41:01.040 going to
00:41:01.240 investigate
00:41:01.660 cardiac-related
00:41:02.580 deaths tied
00:41:03.160 to the
00:41:03.420 mRNA vaccination.
00:41:05.280 Now, I
00:41:06.580 don't have a
00:41:07.380 prediction of
00:41:07.980 how that will
00:41:08.440 go.
00:41:09.420 I'm not
00:41:10.180 entirely sure
00:41:11.260 what their
00:41:12.320 fact-finders
00:41:13.060 would find,
00:41:13.740 if I'd
00:41:14.640 believe them
00:41:15.160 anyway.
00:41:16.420 So who
00:41:16.820 knows?
00:41:17.500 But the
00:41:18.220 part that's
00:41:19.500 salient is
00:41:21.760 that it's
00:41:22.000 free money.
00:41:22.520 Are you
00:41:23.580 telling me
00:41:23.960 that all
00:41:24.360 the other
00:41:24.740 governors
00:41:25.220 could have
00:41:25.660 done this?
00:41:27.300 Is that
00:41:27.660 true?
00:41:28.180 Because there's
00:41:28.800 some rule
00:41:29.760 in Florida
00:41:30.620 that there's
00:41:31.920 a law that
00:41:32.400 says you
00:41:32.700 can't
00:41:32.940 mislead
00:41:33.380 people about
00:41:34.260 medical
00:41:34.680 stuff.
00:41:35.580 But is
00:41:36.220 there only
00:41:36.520 one state
00:41:37.140 that has
00:41:37.480 that law?
00:41:38.380 There's only
00:41:38.700 one state
00:41:39.240 that says
00:41:39.580 you can't
00:41:39.960 mislead
00:41:40.360 people about
00:41:40.880 medical
00:41:41.280 stuff?
00:41:42.140 That feels
00:41:42.760 like maybe
00:41:43.560 that's a
00:41:43.960 little more
00:41:44.240 common than
00:41:44.780 one state.
00:41:45.300 So why
00:41:47.420 in the
00:41:47.680 world is
00:41:51.880 only
00:41:52.280 Florida
00:41:52.720 picking this
00:41:54.340 up?
00:41:55.620 And the
00:41:56.140 answer has
00:41:56.640 to be the
00:41:57.020 obvious.
00:41:58.120 That DeSantis
00:41:58.740 can recognize
00:42:00.220 free money
00:42:00.800 and every
00:42:01.960 time he
00:42:02.260 walks by a
00:42:02.800 table with
00:42:03.220 free money
00:42:03.640 he's like
00:42:04.040 hey,
00:42:05.280 does anybody
00:42:05.900 own this
00:42:06.320 money?
00:42:07.300 And everybody's
00:42:07.900 like eh.
00:42:08.900 And then he
00:42:09.360 just scoops
00:42:10.320 it up and
00:42:11.440 takes his
00:42:11.780 free money.
00:42:13.480 This is like
00:42:14.600 two points
00:42:15.280 of support
00:42:16.340 over Trump.
00:42:18.100 It's just
00:42:18.480 free.
00:42:19.920 Like you
00:42:20.300 can imagine
00:42:20.800 DeSantis
00:42:21.300 looking at
00:42:21.820 this,
00:42:22.520 you know,
00:42:22.700 I don't
00:42:22.860 know who
00:42:23.100 had the
00:42:23.360 idea or
00:42:24.140 whatever,
00:42:24.800 but when
00:42:25.220 he's evaluating
00:42:25.880 whether he
00:42:26.420 should do
00:42:26.740 this,
00:42:27.700 he's probably
00:42:28.120 like okay,
00:42:28.920 if I do
00:42:29.300 this my
00:42:30.000 approval will
00:42:30.660 go up 2%
00:42:31.380 compared to
00:42:32.060 Trump and
00:42:33.420 what's my
00:42:34.160 downside?
00:42:36.100 And they'll
00:42:36.700 say well,
00:42:37.140 they'll think
00:42:37.520 you're like a
00:42:38.560 vax denier.
00:42:40.080 And then he'll
00:42:40.800 say I'm not
00:42:41.940 doing that.
00:42:43.060 I'm getting
00:42:43.720 people who
00:42:44.280 know more
00:42:44.720 than I
00:42:45.080 do to
00:42:46.400 figure out
00:42:47.660 what's true.
00:42:48.620 I'm the
00:42:49.160 opposite of
00:42:49.760 knowing what
00:42:50.200 happened.
00:42:51.220 The opposite
00:42:51.920 is I don't
00:42:52.460 know what
00:42:52.720 happened.
00:42:53.800 So I'm
00:42:54.240 getting some
00:42:55.120 smart people
00:42:55.600 to figure out
00:42:56.080 what happened.
00:42:58.220 It's pretty
00:42:58.820 easy to defend.
00:43:00.600 You know,
00:43:00.740 no matter where
00:43:01.300 it comes down
00:43:01.900 you could say
00:43:02.380 I didn't tell
00:43:03.580 you where it
00:43:03.940 was going to
00:43:04.340 end up.
00:43:05.180 I told you
00:43:05.920 it's important
00:43:06.480 and the people
00:43:07.000 care and we
00:43:07.520 have to look
00:43:07.940 into it.
00:43:08.720 That's my
00:43:09.280 job.
00:43:09.880 My job is
00:43:10.440 not to tell
00:43:10.880 you where it
00:43:11.260 ends up.
00:43:11.840 So I
00:43:14.220 mean it's
00:43:14.420 a perfect
00:43:14.800 position.
00:43:15.880 It's completely
00:43:16.600 logically,
00:43:18.640 morally,
00:43:19.640 ethically,
00:43:20.440 it's just
00:43:21.140 clean.
00:43:22.440 It's like the
00:43:23.120 cleanest thing
00:43:24.960 a politician
00:43:25.520 could ever
00:43:25.960 do.
00:43:27.000 Why is he
00:43:27.720 the only one
00:43:28.200 who ever
00:43:28.460 sees it?
00:43:29.480 It's just
00:43:29.820 free money
00:43:30.560 just sitting
00:43:31.020 there.
00:43:31.820 He picks
00:43:32.100 it up.
00:43:32.400 All right.
00:43:36.720 Rasmussen
00:43:37.080 asked,
00:43:38.420 I think it's
00:43:39.000 likely voters,
00:43:40.440 is the economy
00:43:41.220 better or worse
00:43:42.000 in the past
00:43:42.540 year?
00:43:43.700 Your opinion,
00:43:44.580 please.
00:43:45.180 Is the economy
00:43:45.800 better or worse
00:43:46.760 in the past
00:43:47.380 year?
00:43:48.320 Go.
00:43:48.900 Better or worse
00:43:49.560 in the past
00:43:50.120 year?
00:43:51.040 In the past
00:43:51.600 year is the
00:43:52.100 key.
00:43:52.960 In the past
00:43:53.540 year,
00:43:53.940 better or worse?
00:43:56.440 It's not
00:43:57.080 obvious,
00:43:57.520 is it?
00:43:58.740 I don't know
00:43:59.460 either.
00:44:00.400 I have no
00:44:00.820 idea.
00:44:01.940 I don't
00:44:02.440 think we'll
00:44:02.800 know for a
00:44:03.400 long time
00:44:03.880 probably.
00:44:04.900 We can
00:44:05.400 point to
00:44:05.820 things that
00:44:06.200 are worse
00:44:06.640 and we can
00:44:08.000 point to
00:44:08.400 things that
00:44:08.760 are improving.
00:44:10.740 But is
00:44:11.780 anybody smart
00:44:12.460 enough to
00:44:12.940 net that
00:44:13.420 out?
00:44:15.220 I guess you
00:44:16.240 could look at
00:44:16.580 the GDP and
00:44:17.460 say that's a
00:44:18.000 net, but
00:44:18.820 not really
00:44:19.380 because inflation
00:44:20.340 subtracts from
00:44:21.760 the GDP.
00:44:23.660 I don't know.
00:44:24.620 This is one of
00:44:25.480 the few times
00:44:26.620 when I look at
00:44:27.360 a survey and
00:44:28.660 I say,
00:44:29.140 yeah, that
00:44:29.400 makes sense.
00:44:30.820 Makes total
00:44:31.580 sense that
00:44:32.100 people are
00:44:32.500 mixed.
00:44:33.540 Because probably
00:44:34.080 if you lost
00:44:34.620 your job,
00:44:35.220 it looks worse.
00:44:36.720 If you don't
00:44:38.600 own things that
00:44:39.580 appreciate with
00:44:40.320 inflation, it
00:44:42.120 looks worse.
00:44:43.780 So I guess it
00:44:44.400 just depends what
00:44:45.280 TV you're
00:44:45.940 watching and
00:44:46.660 what's happening
00:44:47.900 to you personally.
00:44:50.360 Yeah.
00:44:51.280 So to me,
00:44:52.520 it looks like
00:44:52.960 it's a little
00:44:53.420 better.
00:44:56.000 Totally subjective
00:44:57.120 perspective, and
00:44:58.060 you could talk
00:44:58.740 me out of that
00:44:59.260 opinion in like
00:45:00.120 a second.
00:45:01.540 Like I'm not
00:45:02.220 wed to it at
00:45:02.780 all.
00:45:03.100 But I'll tell
00:45:03.500 you just my
00:45:04.060 impression.
00:45:05.120 But I think I
00:45:05.600 have optimistic
00:45:06.740 poisoning.
00:45:09.900 I'm basically
00:45:10.800 optimism driven.
00:45:15.680 Dow is down
00:45:16.300 5,000.
00:45:17.380 Well, not
00:45:17.780 today, right?
00:45:20.460 You're not
00:45:20.980 talking about
00:45:21.380 today, are
00:45:21.840 you?
00:45:21.980 Yeah, down
00:45:25.440 2%.
00:45:26.440 Yeah, so, and
00:45:29.620 you all know
00:45:30.160 that the market
00:45:30.840 gets frothy at
00:45:31.960 the end of the
00:45:32.460 year.
00:45:33.440 Here's a little
00:45:34.400 personal investment
00:45:35.640 tip.
00:45:36.320 It goes like
00:45:36.820 this.
00:45:38.540 Stocks always
00:45:39.220 get frothy.
00:45:40.600 They jump up
00:45:41.680 and down toward
00:45:42.220 the end of the
00:45:42.680 year.
00:45:43.260 Because there
00:45:43.640 are a lot of
00:45:43.940 people who are
00:45:44.560 saying, I need
00:45:45.880 to take my
00:45:46.560 gains or my
00:45:48.060 losses in this
00:45:49.460 calendar year.
00:45:50.980 So people are
00:45:51.640 doing a lot of
00:45:52.120 moving around
00:45:52.740 just for tax
00:45:53.380 reasons.
00:45:54.120 But also, there's
00:45:55.020 something that
00:45:55.540 gets into our
00:45:56.160 psychology about
00:45:57.000 the end of the
00:45:57.520 year.
00:45:58.660 There are lots
00:45:59.700 of rumors or
00:46:02.760 not a rumor.
00:46:04.600 There are some
00:46:05.220 historical trends
00:46:06.520 about year ends
00:46:08.040 where people will
00:46:09.640 look at the
00:46:10.060 history and say,
00:46:10.740 oh, it always
00:46:11.980 goes up in
00:46:13.000 January.
00:46:14.340 Or I think it
00:46:15.020 goes up.
00:46:15.660 Does anybody
00:46:16.180 have the actual
00:46:16.740 number?
00:46:17.540 The number of
00:46:18.360 times that the
00:46:18.960 market is up in
00:46:20.040 January compared
00:46:21.580 to December?
00:46:22.800 It's like
00:46:23.760 seven out of
00:46:25.480 nine, something
00:46:26.180 like that.
00:46:27.420 Does anybody
00:46:27.820 have the actual
00:46:28.340 number?
00:46:29.280 There is a
00:46:30.140 history to
00:46:30.700 January as
00:46:31.340 being good.
00:46:36.540 And recently,
00:46:37.740 we've violated
00:46:39.000 that trend, I
00:46:39.660 think.
00:46:41.420 Fuck you,
00:46:41.960 money causes
00:46:42.480 optimism.
00:46:42.920 You know, I'm
00:46:46.080 barely rich.
00:46:46.860 You should have
00:46:50.460 a few divorces
00:46:51.320 and a lot of
00:46:52.500 inflation and
00:46:53.860 then have
00:46:54.300 newspapers get
00:46:55.340 whacked and
00:46:56.160 then get
00:46:56.640 canceled by one
00:46:58.300 of your bigger
00:46:58.900 clients.
00:47:00.420 No, definitely
00:47:02.080 for me personally,
00:47:04.800 my economic
00:47:05.540 situation is way
00:47:06.960 down.
00:47:08.700 I mean, it
00:47:09.640 doesn't matter
00:47:10.180 because I'm at
00:47:11.040 retirement age.
00:47:11.680 But in terms
00:47:12.580 of earning
00:47:13.400 income, well,
00:47:14.340 as well as
00:47:14.720 assets, probably
00:47:16.540 down 30% since
00:47:21.400 before Trump,
00:47:23.480 something like
00:47:23.880 that.
00:47:26.440 No, I'm not
00:47:27.240 broke.
00:47:27.860 Yeah, I'm not
00:47:28.740 complaining.
00:47:33.780 Yeah, I hear
00:47:35.940 you.
00:47:36.380 I hear you.
00:47:36.880 I will
00:47:37.620 stipulate that
00:47:39.700 I'm not
00:47:40.340 suffering.
00:47:41.800 We can all
00:47:42.440 agree on that,
00:47:43.020 okay?
00:47:43.240 You don't have
00:47:43.660 to mock me
00:47:44.180 for it.
00:47:47.040 All right.
00:47:48.480 Yesterday, I
00:47:49.220 did something
00:47:49.660 fascinating.
00:47:51.260 I joined a
00:47:52.420 spaces where
00:47:53.400 there's the
00:47:53.800 audio conversation,
00:47:55.020 so it's just
00:47:55.460 audio, on
00:47:56.500 Twitter.
00:47:57.220 And the
00:47:57.640 topic was
00:47:58.160 reparations.
00:48:00.160 And a
00:48:01.920 big percentage
00:48:02.880 of the audience
00:48:04.240 were black
00:48:05.400 Americans, I
00:48:06.140 assume.
00:48:06.880 based on their
00:48:07.720 profiles and
00:48:08.460 what I could
00:48:08.960 hear.
00:48:09.820 And I'd
00:48:10.620 never had the
00:48:12.600 privilege, and I
00:48:13.600 think it was a
00:48:14.100 privilege, actually,
00:48:15.400 to be exposed to
00:48:17.600 opinions that are
00:48:18.280 so different from
00:48:20.020 my own.
00:48:21.560 It was actually
00:48:22.080 kind of, it was
00:48:23.640 like really good.
00:48:24.780 It was really
00:48:25.360 interesting.
00:48:26.220 Just to hear
00:48:27.180 somebody who's so
00:48:28.480 different, so
00:48:29.860 different in
00:48:30.400 opinion.
00:48:31.400 And I didn't
00:48:32.860 catch it all, so
00:48:33.600 there may be some
00:48:34.200 nuances I missed,
00:48:35.160 so I don't want to
00:48:36.160 characterize the
00:48:36.820 whole thing, but
00:48:37.680 there was a
00:48:38.140 pattern that I
00:48:38.800 noticed, and it
00:48:40.940 goes like this.
00:48:42.600 People in favor of
00:48:43.800 reparations didn't
00:48:44.700 understand how
00:48:45.420 economics work, and
00:48:49.360 would speak in
00:48:50.080 public as if they
00:48:51.780 did, which tells you
00:48:53.040 how deeply their
00:48:54.560 lack of understanding
00:48:55.460 of economics is.
00:48:57.120 Now, I want to
00:48:58.340 make sure that we
00:48:58.900 don't drift into
00:49:00.740 racist territory here,
00:49:02.000 because you do
00:49:03.840 know that the
00:49:04.480 black community in
00:49:05.560 America is very
00:49:07.880 vocal about we
00:49:10.060 need more
00:49:10.520 economics training,
00:49:12.400 personal finance and
00:49:13.400 economics.
00:49:14.180 You've heard that,
00:49:14.960 right?
00:49:15.480 That's a real thing.
00:49:16.820 And that is a real,
00:49:18.080 in my opinion,
00:49:19.000 that's a sign of
00:49:20.820 systemic racism,
00:49:22.600 meaning just the
00:49:23.540 system not with any
00:49:25.320 intention, but
00:49:26.680 sometimes the system
00:49:27.520 just gets you into a
00:49:28.440 situation that nobody
00:49:29.400 intended.
00:49:29.800 And one of those
00:49:31.420 is, I believe that
00:49:33.440 white people in
00:49:34.420 general, this is not
00:49:35.620 true of all people,
00:49:36.820 nothing's true of all
00:49:37.700 people, I think white
00:49:39.380 people sort of pick it
00:49:40.300 up by osmosis, like
00:49:42.400 you just pick up
00:49:43.780 economics just by
00:49:46.200 hanging around it.
00:49:48.140 Is that true?
00:49:49.560 And I'll give you a
00:49:50.160 specific example.
00:49:51.840 And I didn't realize
00:49:52.700 that I'd gotten an
00:49:53.820 entire economics
00:49:54.840 lesson as a child
00:49:56.000 until I saw somebody
00:49:57.800 else on Twitter
00:49:58.620 mentioned that his
00:50:02.420 mother gave him
00:50:04.420 two rules.
00:50:06.960 I hope I wrote
00:50:07.780 those down.
00:50:08.340 I'd be so mad if I
00:50:09.140 didn't.
00:50:13.340 And the two rules
00:50:14.520 were, one was
00:50:18.180 life isn't fair.
00:50:20.500 Oh, shit, what was
00:50:21.460 that one?
00:50:23.080 Life isn't fair and
00:50:24.360 nothing's free.
00:50:25.560 Thank you.
00:50:26.140 Thank you for
00:50:26.620 money.
00:50:26.840 Yeah, so he said
00:50:28.140 his mother taught
00:50:28.860 him, life isn't
00:50:30.100 fair and nothing's
00:50:31.200 free.
00:50:33.140 That's exactly what
00:50:34.520 my mother taught
00:50:35.180 me, exactly.
00:50:36.700 Life isn't fair and
00:50:39.140 if you didn't work
00:50:40.400 for it, you didn't
00:50:41.980 deserve it.
00:50:43.120 Basically, nothing's
00:50:43.980 free.
00:50:45.880 If you unpack that,
00:50:48.500 that's the entire
00:50:49.300 theory of economics.
00:50:51.180 I didn't even realize
00:50:52.260 that until this
00:50:52.840 morning.
00:50:53.100 It's the entire
00:50:54.840 theory of economics.
00:50:56.820 Life isn't fair,
00:50:58.600 nothing's free.
00:50:59.740 If you just took
00:51:00.640 that little seed and
00:51:02.920 just say, all right,
00:51:03.480 what does that mean?
00:51:05.020 Like, what does that
00:51:06.120 imply?
00:51:07.600 Free markets.
00:51:09.540 Capitalism.
00:51:10.520 It's all there.
00:51:11.940 The entire thing is
00:51:13.180 there with just life
00:51:15.040 isn't fair and
00:51:15.580 nothing's free.
00:51:16.120 Because what that
00:51:18.400 told me to do in
00:51:19.260 life is what?
00:51:21.620 Find my advantage
00:51:23.220 that other people
00:51:25.000 didn't have.
00:51:25.720 Why?
00:51:26.660 Because life isn't
00:51:27.420 fair.
00:51:28.860 And my mother told
00:51:29.780 me that specifically.
00:51:31.360 Life isn't fair, go
00:51:32.540 where it's unfair in
00:51:33.740 your favor.
00:51:35.460 So I went exactly
00:51:36.860 where it was unfair
00:51:37.840 in my favor, to
00:51:40.400 college.
00:51:41.500 Because I knew as a
00:51:42.780 young white man in
00:51:43.860 America during those
00:51:44.840 years, if I went to
00:51:46.100 college, I could
00:51:47.840 pretty much own the
00:51:48.620 world.
00:51:49.820 And so I did.
00:51:51.100 I just found my
00:51:51.980 unfair advantage and
00:51:52.980 I took it.
00:51:54.220 Now, if you're black
00:51:55.560 in America, what are
00:51:57.960 you going to do?
00:51:58.660 What's your unfair
00:51:59.540 advantage?
00:52:01.080 Do you have any?
00:52:02.400 Yes, you do.
00:52:03.740 Yeah, you have
00:52:04.140 plenty.
00:52:05.360 Unfair advantage,
00:52:06.160 number one.
00:52:07.300 You could get more
00:52:08.320 funding to go to
00:52:09.100 college.
00:52:10.460 Now, I'm not
00:52:11.200 ignoring all the
00:52:13.940 disadvantages.
00:52:14.500 We will stipulate
00:52:16.780 that being black
00:52:18.940 in America comes
00:52:19.700 with a bag of
00:52:20.760 disadvantages.
00:52:21.940 But life is
00:52:23.260 unfair.
00:52:24.420 So find where you
00:52:25.340 have an advantage.
00:52:26.800 Go to any, you
00:52:27.780 know, get your
00:52:28.200 college education
00:52:29.060 that's more likely
00:52:30.640 paid for than not.
00:52:32.580 Go to any
00:52:33.200 Fortune 500 company
00:52:34.400 and apply for a job
00:52:35.300 with your college
00:52:36.000 education, and they
00:52:37.620 will favor you over
00:52:38.860 pretty much everybody.
00:52:40.380 That's your advantage.
00:52:41.240 You can just walk
00:52:42.760 into any company
00:52:43.440 and they'll hire you
00:52:44.240 if you're qualified.
00:52:46.940 I can't do that.
00:52:50.160 Pretty much only
00:52:51.120 black people in
00:52:52.440 America can get any
00:52:53.760 job they want if
00:52:54.760 they're qualified.
00:52:56.120 White people can't
00:52:56.920 get any job they
00:52:57.760 want if they're
00:52:58.200 qualified.
00:52:59.140 They can work in
00:52:59.880 their field pretty
00:53:01.440 much every time,
00:53:02.520 right?
00:53:03.160 Like if you're, if
00:53:04.340 you've got some
00:53:04.800 skills, you can work
00:53:05.760 in that field.
00:53:06.360 But if you're a
00:53:07.440 black American, you
00:53:08.440 can get close to
00:53:09.780 100% of jobs you
00:53:10.840 apply for if you're
00:53:12.200 qualified.
00:53:13.020 Because there's a
00:53:13.740 preference.
00:53:14.860 It's an unfair
00:53:15.420 advantage at the
00:53:16.940 moment that they
00:53:18.240 should take advantage
00:53:18.920 of.
00:53:19.740 And do you, have
00:53:20.620 you ever heard me
00:53:21.240 bitching that black
00:53:24.060 people have that
00:53:25.140 like little narrow
00:53:26.120 advantage?
00:53:27.520 Opposite.
00:53:28.100 I recommend they
00:53:28.800 take advantage of
00:53:29.500 it.
00:53:30.280 Because I'm doing
00:53:31.120 it.
00:53:31.560 If I find an
00:53:32.320 advantage for myself,
00:53:33.740 I'm going to be
00:53:34.400 all over it.
00:53:34.980 That's how the
00:53:36.280 system works.
00:53:37.140 If you find an
00:53:38.160 advantage for
00:53:38.640 yourself that I
00:53:39.420 don't have, please
00:53:41.120 exploit it.
00:53:42.560 That's how my
00:53:43.320 system works better.
00:53:44.640 You exploit your
00:53:45.580 advantage, I exploit
00:53:46.580 my advantage.
00:53:47.200 If it's legal, we
00:53:48.760 exploit our
00:53:49.280 advantages, and then
00:53:50.540 the whole thing
00:53:51.060 rises.
00:53:51.620 That's how it
00:53:52.020 works.
00:53:53.700 Let me give you
00:53:54.400 an example of how
00:53:55.080 the participants did
00:53:56.160 not understand
00:53:56.900 economics.
00:53:58.240 One proponent of
00:54:00.000 reparations said,
00:54:02.020 people don't
00:54:02.760 understand that when
00:54:04.580 you do something
00:54:05.420 that helps black
00:54:07.780 Americans, that
00:54:09.320 everybody else does
00:54:10.460 well too.
00:54:11.840 So it's almost
00:54:12.420 like it's free.
00:54:14.680 Have you ever
00:54:15.080 heard me say
00:54:15.600 that?
00:54:16.680 Have you ever
00:54:17.280 heard me say
00:54:17.840 that if you did
00:54:19.680 reparations, it
00:54:20.460 actually might be
00:54:21.340 good for everybody?
00:54:22.520 I have.
00:54:23.580 I have.
00:54:24.360 So I've made
00:54:25.020 that same point,
00:54:26.480 that anything that
00:54:27.660 helps black America
00:54:28.760 helps everybody.
00:54:31.180 Right?
00:54:31.300 Now what's wrong
00:54:32.720 with that?
00:54:34.620 You see what's
00:54:35.460 wrong with it?
00:54:37.280 In the context
00:54:38.380 of reparations,
00:54:40.220 it's not yes or
00:54:41.040 no reparations.
00:54:42.740 That's not how you
00:54:43.640 do economics.
00:54:45.000 That's not how you
00:54:45.780 do decision making.
00:54:47.520 Here's how you do
00:54:48.240 it, and this is
00:54:49.180 something I learned,
00:54:50.880 but maybe black
00:54:52.300 Americans don't have
00:54:53.300 access to the same
00:54:54.300 mentoring or
00:54:56.460 something.
00:54:57.560 But here's what I
00:54:58.320 learned.
00:54:59.080 You have to make
00:54:59.860 the right comparison.
00:55:01.600 The comparison is
00:55:02.420 not reparations yes
00:55:03.440 or no.
00:55:04.300 It's not like
00:55:04.780 there's a bucket
00:55:05.320 of money that
00:55:06.760 sits there unspent
00:55:08.140 if we don't do
00:55:09.580 reparations.
00:55:11.240 Reparations have
00:55:11.940 to be compared to
00:55:12.740 all other uses
00:55:13.540 for money.
00:55:15.200 You all knew
00:55:15.780 that, right?
00:55:17.840 The money is
00:55:18.840 not earmarked.
00:55:20.920 You know,
00:55:21.200 the government
00:55:22.020 collects taxes
00:55:22.860 and they raise
00:55:23.880 debt to pay for
00:55:24.580 things, but they
00:55:26.020 get to decide on
00:55:27.160 all those things,
00:55:28.040 and all of those
00:55:28.960 things have to be
00:55:29.660 weighed against
00:55:30.140 all the other
00:55:30.640 things.
00:55:31.540 So if you're
00:55:32.360 going to say
00:55:32.840 reparations yes
00:55:33.840 or no, that just
00:55:35.200 shows you don't
00:55:35.700 understand how
00:55:36.740 anything works,
00:55:38.080 because it's not
00:55:38.540 even the right
00:55:38.940 question.
00:55:40.240 You can't get the
00:55:41.180 right answer to
00:55:42.360 the wrong question.
00:55:43.420 That doesn't move
00:55:44.280 you forward.
00:55:45.060 Here's the right
00:55:45.620 question.
00:55:47.120 If you had, let's
00:55:48.320 say reparations were
00:55:49.180 going to cost, I
00:55:50.000 know, what, a
00:55:51.880 trillion dollars or
00:55:52.660 something?
00:55:53.660 Just pick a number.
00:55:55.200 The question is,
00:55:55.960 what else could you
00:55:56.580 use the trillion
00:55:57.180 dollars for?
00:55:57.820 And if the
00:55:59.480 answer is giving
00:56:01.400 money to everybody
00:56:02.200 who is poor, or
00:56:05.460 fixing all the
00:56:06.880 schools for
00:56:07.580 everybody, which
00:56:09.940 would be better
00:56:10.700 for the economy?
00:56:12.260 Well, almost
00:56:13.040 certainly it would
00:56:14.520 be better to give
00:56:15.460 two poor people
00:56:16.580 extra help than it
00:56:19.320 would be to give
00:56:20.160 one poor black
00:56:21.300 person some extra
00:56:22.240 reparations and one
00:56:23.980 rich black person
00:56:25.460 some reparations.
00:56:28.120 Am I wrong?
00:56:29.700 If you found a
00:56:30.500 poor, you know,
00:56:32.160 Chinese American
00:56:33.040 and a poor black
00:56:37.320 American, and
00:56:38.400 they're both really
00:56:39.060 poor, and you
00:56:40.360 helped those two
00:56:41.120 people, don't you
00:56:41.880 get more bang for
00:56:42.680 your buck than if
00:56:43.980 you helped one
00:56:44.660 poor black person,
00:56:46.620 poor black American,
00:56:47.600 and one well-off
00:56:49.500 black American?
00:56:50.660 There's no question,
00:56:51.660 right?
00:56:51.780 So the people
00:56:53.120 who are saying
00:56:53.540 that helping black
00:56:54.380 Americans helps
00:56:55.120 everybody, therefore
00:56:55.980 that's my analysis,
00:56:57.920 that's just somebody
00:56:58.560 who doesn't
00:56:58.960 understand really
00:56:59.920 basic economics.
00:57:01.660 Here's something
00:57:02.480 else that one of
00:57:04.400 the speakers said.
00:57:05.900 People are worried
00:57:06.680 that it would cause
00:57:07.420 inflation, but they
00:57:08.960 don't understand
00:57:09.640 that it won't.
00:57:11.180 That printing money
00:57:12.380 we don't have, a
00:57:14.040 trillion dollars, and
00:57:14.960 giving it to black
00:57:15.700 Americans won't cause
00:57:16.880 inflation.
00:57:17.560 Why?
00:57:18.420 Because it would
00:57:19.160 help the economic
00:57:20.040 activity.
00:57:20.600 So that would not
00:57:23.060 hurt inflation, it
00:57:24.420 would boost the
00:57:25.020 economic activity, so
00:57:26.320 you don't have to
00:57:27.100 worry about inflation.
00:57:28.820 Does anybody see a
00:57:29.980 problem with that?
00:57:32.020 Do you know where
00:57:32.900 inflation comes from?
00:57:34.920 It comes from every
00:57:36.300 boost of economic
00:57:37.560 activity.
00:57:39.960 It comes from
00:57:40.980 printing money and
00:57:41.940 throwing it into the
00:57:42.820 system, no matter
00:57:44.260 where.
00:57:45.300 It doesn't matter
00:57:45.840 where you put the
00:57:46.500 money, it's all
00:57:47.640 inflationary.
00:57:49.200 And so a gentleman
00:57:50.680 argued that it
00:57:51.780 wasn't inflationary
00:57:52.900 by its nature.
00:57:54.860 By its nature, it
00:57:55.940 wasn't inflationary,
00:57:57.180 because it was good
00:57:58.120 for, you know, the
00:57:59.720 economy.
00:58:01.020 Now, that is the
00:58:03.740 least understanding
00:58:04.560 of economics you
00:58:05.380 could ever have.
00:58:06.960 Now, it's not a
00:58:08.080 reason not to do
00:58:08.840 it.
00:58:09.660 I'm not saying that
00:58:10.680 you should not do
00:58:11.460 it because of
00:58:12.420 inflation.
00:58:13.240 I'm saying you
00:58:13.840 should at least
00:58:14.180 understand it, you
00:58:15.860 know, understand the
00:58:16.580 interplay between
00:58:17.300 putting money into
00:58:18.140 the system and
00:58:18.920 inflation.
00:58:20.380 So, my experience
00:58:23.040 was, and by the
00:58:23.620 way, nobody pushed
00:58:25.060 back that I heard.
00:58:27.700 I didn't hear
00:58:28.320 anybody raise their
00:58:29.100 hand and say, oh,
00:58:30.460 you know, just a
00:58:31.120 correction, any money
00:58:32.100 you put into the
00:58:32.700 system is inflationary.
00:58:33.860 There's no exception
00:58:34.540 to that.
00:58:35.900 Is there?
00:58:36.880 Is there any
00:58:37.300 exception to that?
00:58:38.320 I mean, this
00:58:38.820 wouldn't be one, but
00:58:39.700 maybe there is.
00:58:40.300 So, there's part
00:58:44.720 of me who believes
00:58:45.640 that we don't
00:58:47.220 have a racial and
00:58:51.340 philosophical divide.
00:58:54.060 We have a
00:58:55.620 knowledge problem.
00:58:58.080 And that people
00:58:59.020 who have similar
00:58:59.780 knowledge end up
00:59:00.640 in the same place
00:59:01.460 where economics is
00:59:03.560 involved.
00:59:04.940 And you have this
00:59:06.100 weird situation
00:59:06.800 where black America
00:59:07.680 is practically
00:59:09.000 screaming that
00:59:11.120 they know they
00:59:11.700 need personal
00:59:13.420 finance and
00:59:14.200 economic education.
00:59:17.060 And they're asking
00:59:17.660 for it to be
00:59:18.300 included in schools
00:59:19.700 and stuff.
00:59:20.520 I'm totally on
00:59:21.260 board with that.
00:59:22.020 But don't you
00:59:22.800 think that's one
00:59:23.400 place where the
00:59:24.680 Republicans can not
00:59:25.880 only agree with
00:59:26.780 black Americans
00:59:27.600 completely, but the
00:59:29.940 more aggressively
00:59:30.740 they help them get
00:59:31.680 what they're asking
00:59:32.300 for in that domain,
00:59:34.400 the better off
00:59:35.100 everybody's going
00:59:35.680 to be.
00:59:36.420 Am I wrong?
00:59:37.620 What Republican is
00:59:38.620 going to be
00:59:38.920 worse off because
00:59:39.640 black Americans
00:59:40.500 are brought up
00:59:42.380 to speed on
00:59:43.060 finance?
00:59:45.620 That's just all
00:59:46.500 good.
00:59:47.340 There's nothing
00:59:47.800 bad about that
00:59:48.480 in any way.
00:59:51.340 Teachers unions
00:59:52.140 are the problem.
00:59:53.000 Once again,
00:59:53.540 you were correct.
00:59:58.180 And that,
00:59:58.980 ladies and
00:59:59.320 gentlemen,
01:00:00.580 is the conclusion
01:00:01.300 of my exciting
01:00:02.220 show.
01:00:02.760 Was there anything
01:00:03.180 I missed today?
01:00:04.140 I feel like there
01:00:04.720 was a story I
01:00:05.600 missed.
01:00:05.980 Milton Friedman?
01:00:10.680 Yeah,
01:00:10.920 Milton Friedman's
01:00:11.740 sort of a
01:00:12.220 challenging
01:00:12.960 place to start.
01:00:14.960 I wouldn't
01:00:15.380 start anybody
01:00:16.840 with Milton
01:00:17.380 Friedman.
01:00:19.860 I'm a fan,
01:00:21.500 but I wouldn't
01:00:22.460 start there.
01:00:23.560 I'd start
01:00:24.020 simpler.
01:00:28.260 Handing out
01:00:28.880 money to people
01:00:29.460 for nothing
01:00:30.120 never works.
01:00:31.180 Well,
01:00:32.800 here's the
01:00:33.240 problem with
01:00:33.700 never.
01:00:36.540 Never makes
01:00:37.400 sense when the
01:00:38.000 environment is
01:00:38.640 similar.
01:00:40.160 But we're,
01:00:41.180 as we enter
01:00:42.080 the AI
01:00:43.080 singularity and
01:00:44.320 the age of
01:00:45.080 robots,
01:00:46.380 we might have
01:00:47.180 to rethink
01:00:47.760 that giving
01:00:48.980 money to
01:00:49.500 somebody for
01:00:49.960 nothing doesn't
01:00:50.580 work.
01:00:51.400 It might always
01:00:52.320 be true.
01:00:53.180 I'm open to the
01:00:54.080 fact that there's
01:00:54.720 nothing that could
01:00:55.320 change that.
01:00:55.960 but there
01:00:58.680 might be no
01:00:59.320 other alternative.
01:01:00.580 There might just
01:01:01.020 not be enough
01:01:01.560 jobs,
01:01:02.020 so we'll see.
01:01:07.460 Subtract
01:01:07.900 BLM riots
01:01:08.780 from reparation
01:01:09.600 debt.
01:01:10.420 Well,
01:01:10.880 yeah.
01:01:12.560 And here's the
01:01:13.300 other thing.
01:01:13.680 I've said this
01:01:14.360 before.
01:01:14.980 If you were
01:01:15.460 going to
01:01:15.660 calculate how
01:01:16.300 much the
01:01:16.740 reparation should
01:01:17.560 be,
01:01:18.700 how would you
01:01:19.600 do that?
01:01:20.780 Well,
01:01:21.080 if you
01:01:21.340 understood
01:01:21.700 economics,
01:01:23.520 and here's
01:01:24.120 the problem
01:01:24.500 again,
01:01:24.800 you would
01:01:26.860 compare to
01:01:27.320 Nigeria,
01:01:28.060 or you
01:01:28.320 would compare
01:01:28.740 to wherever
01:01:29.900 in Africa
01:01:30.700 the slaves
01:01:32.160 were originally
01:01:32.820 taken from,
01:01:34.320 you would say,
01:01:35.000 how is that
01:01:35.400 local population
01:01:36.280 doing compared
01:01:37.700 to the people
01:01:38.240 who had the
01:01:38.920 misfortune of
01:01:39.760 being slaves?
01:01:41.360 And I think
01:01:41.780 you would find
01:01:42.240 that the
01:01:43.080 descendants of
01:01:44.320 the slaves
01:01:44.840 are doing
01:01:45.880 better than
01:01:46.440 the descendants
01:01:47.100 of the people
01:01:47.860 who captured
01:01:49.680 them.
01:01:50.680 Probably the
01:01:51.120 people who
01:01:51.500 captured the
01:01:52.140 slaves and sold
01:01:53.000 them,
01:01:53.860 but stayed
01:01:54.380 in Africa
01:01:54.840 themselves.
01:01:55.920 Probably not
01:01:56.600 doing so
01:01:57.000 well.
01:01:58.020 I don't
01:01:58.200 know.
01:01:58.880 Probably
01:01:59.140 not.
01:02:02.860 A
01:02:03.220 sip
01:02:03.420 premises.
01:02:05.460 Somebody just
01:02:06.180 called me a
01:02:06.700 white sip
01:02:07.380 premises.
01:02:08.820 Okay,
01:02:09.100 that's pretty
01:02:09.500 clever.
01:02:10.940 See,
01:02:11.220 that's why I
01:02:12.060 accept my
01:02:13.760 inaccurate name
01:02:15.060 Claude Adams,
01:02:16.280 because it's
01:02:16.940 funny.
01:02:17.980 As long as
01:02:18.760 it's funny,
01:02:19.260 I'm okay with
01:02:19.780 it.
01:02:22.440 Humorous is
01:02:23.080 good.
01:02:24.380 All right.
01:02:28.100 Start with
01:02:28.740 Hayek.
01:02:34.880 Have you
01:02:35.400 been to a
01:02:35.760 school in
01:02:36.400 Baltimore?
01:02:37.060 How can you
01:02:37.520 genuinely blame
01:02:38.220 that situation
01:02:38.800 on the
01:02:39.160 teachers or
01:02:39.760 the schools
01:02:40.280 or the
01:02:40.660 NEA?
01:02:43.020 Easily.
01:02:44.520 Choice.
01:02:45.740 That's how
01:02:46.240 it's done.
01:02:47.600 Yeah.
01:02:48.560 The teachers
01:02:49.740 unions make
01:02:52.300 it impossible
01:02:52.840 to have an
01:02:53.320 option.
01:02:54.560 If they had
01:02:55.080 more of a
01:02:55.740 free market
01:02:56.260 school in
01:02:56.820 Baltimore,
01:02:57.160 you don't
01:02:57.560 think it
01:02:57.840 would be
01:02:58.060 better?
01:02:59.300 If the
01:02:59.840 kids who
01:03:00.200 went to
01:03:00.440 the school
01:03:00.740 that totally
01:03:01.260 doesn't work,
01:03:02.040 the public
01:03:02.420 one, had an
01:03:04.100 option of
01:03:05.460 going to
01:03:06.020 some kind
01:03:06.640 of a private
01:03:07.200 one that
01:03:08.220 did work,
01:03:09.240 you don't
01:03:09.700 think anybody
01:03:10.160 would make
01:03:10.500 that choice?
01:03:12.600 Now, I know
01:03:13.300 what you're
01:03:13.540 saying.
01:03:13.820 You're saying
01:03:14.160 that Baltimore,
01:03:15.360 it looks like
01:03:16.100 the people are
01:03:16.700 the problem.
01:03:17.280 Is that what
01:03:17.620 you're going to
01:03:17.900 say?
01:03:18.700 Like, if
01:03:19.080 you're actually
01:03:19.420 there, it
01:03:20.120 just looks
01:03:20.480 like it's
01:03:21.460 just a tough
01:03:22.160 neighborhood and
01:03:22.780 nothing's going
01:03:23.280 to work.
01:03:24.140 But there's
01:03:24.640 always somebody
01:03:25.400 in any group
01:03:27.140 who can get
01:03:28.140 out, and
01:03:28.880 they don't
01:03:29.100 have an
01:03:29.360 option now.
01:03:34.380 All right.
01:03:38.940 Here's a
01:03:39.460 question.
01:03:40.420 Somebody asked
01:03:40.900 me, it says,
01:03:41.440 you, Trump,
01:03:42.100 meaning me,
01:03:42.980 me, Trump,
01:03:43.580 Cernovich,
01:03:44.020 DeSantis,
01:03:44.480 Kerry, Lake,
01:03:44.920 Tulsi, and
01:03:46.720 Georgi, Malani,
01:03:47.440 on a desert
01:03:48.040 island for a
01:03:48.740 year, who's
01:03:49.220 the boss?
01:03:49.960 All right, let
01:03:50.360 me think.
01:03:51.560 Me, Trump,
01:03:52.540 Cernovich,
01:03:53.200 DeSantis,
01:03:54.740 Kerry, Lake,
01:03:55.480 Tulsi,
01:03:55.900 Gabbard,
01:03:57.240 Georgi, and
01:03:57.800 Malani on a
01:03:58.660 desert island.
01:03:59.300 Who's the
01:03:59.680 boss?
01:04:03.420 No, no, no.
01:04:04.260 That's a tough
01:04:04.780 one.
01:04:06.180 That's a tough
01:04:06.840 one.
01:04:07.760 It's a tough
01:04:08.420 one because I
01:04:08.980 always say me.
01:04:10.880 No, it'd be
01:04:11.340 me.
01:04:11.860 Yeah, it'd be
01:04:12.200 me.
01:04:13.320 It would be
01:04:13.920 me.
01:04:16.740 Now, I
01:04:17.240 wouldn't
01:04:17.440 necessarily
01:04:17.860 be in
01:04:20.240 charge.
01:04:21.920 So I
01:04:22.360 wouldn't
01:04:22.560 necessarily
01:04:23.000 be the
01:04:23.500 leader,
01:04:25.660 but I'm
01:04:26.260 pretty sure I
01:04:26.780 would get
01:04:27.160 what I
01:04:27.380 wanted.
01:04:28.680 So here's
01:04:29.220 one of the
01:04:29.860 tricks in
01:04:30.480 my book that
01:04:31.780 I'm just
01:04:32.460 finishing.
01:04:33.900 So I've
01:04:36.360 got a chapter
01:04:36.860 on knowing
01:04:37.620 who has the
01:04:38.200 power.
01:04:40.300 And lots
01:04:41.020 of times we
01:04:41.680 mistakenly think
01:04:43.360 that the
01:04:43.640 person has the
01:04:44.240 title, a
01:04:45.460 boss, has
01:04:46.400 the power.
01:04:47.320 But there's
01:04:47.960 so many times
01:04:48.560 that's not
01:04:49.000 true.
01:04:49.820 And the
01:04:50.440 primary time
01:04:51.300 that's not
01:04:51.740 true is if
01:04:53.220 somebody has a
01:04:53.820 better idea.
01:04:56.040 In my
01:04:56.760 experience, the
01:04:57.680 person with the
01:04:58.380 best ideas is
01:05:00.720 always in
01:05:01.180 charge.
01:05:02.360 Whoever the
01:05:02.900 boss is is
01:05:03.540 almost irrelevant.
01:05:05.080 If the boss
01:05:05.840 sits in a
01:05:06.260 meeting and
01:05:07.420 there's one
01:05:07.820 person who
01:05:08.260 comes up with
01:05:08.740 an idea that's
01:05:09.360 just clearly,
01:05:10.580 obviously, the
01:05:11.220 right thing to
01:05:11.720 do, what's the
01:05:12.980 boss going to
01:05:13.440 say?
01:05:14.560 Don't do
01:05:15.120 that.
01:05:16.580 Now, whoever
01:05:17.440 has the best
01:05:18.060 idea is always
01:05:18.800 in charge.
01:05:20.000 So when you
01:05:20.780 asked me about
01:05:21.360 the island, you
01:05:23.640 were probably
01:05:24.020 thinking, all
01:05:24.580 right, who's
01:05:24.940 the alpha?
01:05:26.280 Like, who
01:05:26.620 would be the
01:05:27.240 most, let's
01:05:28.840 say, power-centric
01:05:29.940 person who would
01:05:30.720 become the
01:05:31.100 natural leader?
01:05:32.100 And I think
01:05:32.620 that would either
01:05:33.060 be Trump or
01:05:34.340 Sertovich or
01:05:35.380 DeSantis,
01:05:36.480 probably.
01:05:37.560 Because I
01:05:37.900 think on an
01:05:38.740 island it would
01:05:39.260 end up being
01:05:39.740 male.
01:05:40.880 Because if
01:05:41.360 you're on an
01:05:41.800 island, you
01:05:42.980 there's no
01:05:43.400 social anything,
01:05:45.100 the men are
01:05:45.720 in charge.
01:05:47.980 I mean, maybe
01:05:49.180 Carrie Lake
01:05:49.780 rises to the
01:05:50.480 top, but not
01:05:50.980 really.
01:05:51.640 I think the
01:05:52.040 men are in
01:05:52.440 charge if it's
01:05:53.100 just no law.
01:05:55.340 So then you
01:05:56.040 would say, who's
01:05:56.520 the most alpha?
01:05:58.100 And you look
01:05:58.840 at, okay, who
01:06:00.160 could win a
01:06:00.680 fight?
01:06:02.300 Sertovich, from
01:06:03.540 that group.
01:06:04.640 Like, if it
01:06:05.060 turned into a
01:06:06.540 cage match, he
01:06:08.080 would win the
01:06:08.820 fight.
01:06:09.960 So does that
01:06:10.560 make him the
01:06:11.040 leader of the
01:06:11.480 island?
01:06:12.980 Well, I
01:06:14.520 still say that
01:06:15.420 how the
01:06:16.280 island is run
01:06:17.040 for the
01:06:17.380 benefit of
01:06:17.900 all is a
01:06:19.100 question of
01:06:19.740 having the
01:06:20.700 best ideas.
01:06:22.240 So regardless
01:06:23.180 of whether the
01:06:24.240 strongest or
01:06:25.040 the, you
01:06:26.100 know, if it's
01:06:27.000 Trump or
01:06:27.360 whoever, whoever
01:06:28.240 has the best
01:06:28.860 ideas is still
01:06:29.660 going to get
01:06:30.100 the biggest
01:06:31.740 influence.
01:06:32.880 So who has
01:06:33.920 the power?
01:06:35.020 The person with
01:06:35.880 the title or the
01:06:36.500 best ideas?
01:06:38.620 What would you
01:06:39.360 say?
01:06:39.600 In your way
01:06:41.200 of viewing, does
01:06:43.420 the boss have
01:06:44.000 the power, because
01:06:44.860 they have the
01:06:46.540 ability, I guess,
01:06:47.840 to fire
01:06:48.560 somebody, or
01:06:49.840 does the
01:06:50.560 employee who
01:06:51.420 is indispensable
01:06:52.320 and has all
01:06:52.940 the good
01:06:53.180 ideas?
01:06:54.700 To me, it's
01:06:55.180 easy.
01:06:56.140 The employee
01:06:56.620 has all the
01:06:57.060 power.
01:06:58.080 Now, you
01:06:58.800 could argue
01:06:59.260 it, but as
01:07:00.340 a way of
01:07:01.280 living and
01:07:02.140 going through
01:07:02.540 my life, I
01:07:04.200 walk into
01:07:04.740 every environment
01:07:05.560 thinking I'm
01:07:06.220 in control.
01:07:06.740 It's not
01:07:08.580 true, right?
01:07:10.720 It's not
01:07:11.240 true, but I
01:07:12.400 never walk into
01:07:13.120 a room that I
01:07:13.720 don't think I
01:07:14.180 control, because
01:07:15.900 I have enough
01:07:16.740 skill that if I
01:07:18.480 needed to, I
01:07:19.200 could.
01:07:20.460 It's just
01:07:20.780 usually you
01:07:21.240 don't need
01:07:21.580 to.
01:07:24.700 Who would
01:07:25.240 eat first?
01:07:27.840 Carrie
01:07:28.240 Lake's lawsuit.
01:07:29.320 She has a
01:07:29.740 lawsuit against
01:07:30.320 Maricopa.
01:07:31.100 Is that the
01:07:31.420 one you're
01:07:31.640 talking about?
01:07:34.000 Yeah.
01:07:34.400 So, I
01:07:36.240 don't know if
01:07:36.680 there are any
01:07:37.080 lawsuits that
01:07:38.960 will find, does
01:07:39.960 a lawsuit have
01:07:42.380 to find standing?
01:07:43.520 It does, right?
01:07:44.220 I don't know
01:07:44.640 enough about the
01:07:45.300 law.
01:07:46.060 But won't the
01:07:46.860 courts say the
01:07:47.480 same things they
01:07:48.220 always say, which
01:07:49.440 is the election's
01:07:50.160 already over, or
01:07:52.240 something like
01:07:52.740 that?
01:07:53.480 It's like, we
01:07:54.220 don't listen to
01:07:55.180 cases where our
01:07:56.560 ruling would have
01:07:57.220 no, there's no
01:07:58.140 point to it, because
01:07:59.680 we're not going to
01:08:00.140 go back in time and
01:08:01.020 change it, right?
01:08:04.400 But maybe if
01:08:05.960 they're just
01:08:06.300 suing some
01:08:06.920 individuals or
01:08:08.080 something, maybe
01:08:08.620 it's different, I
01:08:09.360 don't know.
01:08:12.920 Yeah, Carrie
01:08:13.400 Lake says she
01:08:13.960 has evidence of
01:08:14.700 malfeasance.
01:08:15.700 Now, here's what
01:08:16.600 you need to do.
01:08:18.300 How many, remember
01:08:19.480 when the initial
01:08:21.640 claims of election
01:08:23.220 malfeasance came
01:08:24.080 up in 2020?
01:08:25.480 You remember I
01:08:26.120 said, soon, early
01:08:27.700 and often, I
01:08:29.040 said that most, 95%
01:08:31.140 of all the claims
01:08:32.060 you hear will be
01:08:33.600 bullshit.
01:08:34.400 And that I
01:08:35.420 didn't know if
01:08:35.960 5% would be
01:08:36.800 true, but I
01:08:38.180 could guarantee
01:08:38.740 that at least 90%
01:08:40.120 would not be
01:08:40.700 true.
01:08:42.040 How have I
01:08:42.700 done?
01:08:43.880 Wouldn't you say
01:08:44.600 that 95% of the
01:08:45.700 claims were
01:08:46.260 definitely not
01:08:46.940 true so far?
01:08:48.700 Which has nothing
01:08:49.660 to do with whether
01:08:50.620 it was fair or
01:08:52.240 not.
01:08:53.200 Separate
01:08:53.620 questions.
01:08:55.160 I'm just saying
01:08:55.740 there will always
01:08:56.320 be 10 to 1
01:08:57.280 untrue statements,
01:08:58.900 at least.
01:09:00.200 If not all.
01:09:01.760 At least 10 to
01:09:02.660 1.
01:09:02.840 So, now you
01:09:04.480 say, Carrie
01:09:05.200 Lake is now
01:09:05.940 one of the
01:09:06.360 10, and she
01:09:08.080 has claims.
01:09:09.120 And she even
01:09:09.560 has a whistleblower,
01:09:10.420 right?
01:09:11.000 So, it doesn't
01:09:12.480 even matter how
01:09:13.080 strong the
01:09:13.860 claim sounds,
01:09:14.660 right?
01:09:15.460 But, so would
01:09:17.760 you say that the
01:09:18.500 existence of the
01:09:19.300 whistleblower, plus
01:09:21.200 whatever you think
01:09:21.880 about Carrie
01:09:22.400 Lake's own
01:09:23.080 reputation and
01:09:24.220 credibility, do you
01:09:25.780 think that those
01:09:26.320 two suggest that
01:09:27.860 this will be in
01:09:28.460 the 5%, or
01:09:30.400 will it be in
01:09:30.940 the 95% that
01:09:32.180 turn out to be
01:09:32.800 bullshit, almost
01:09:34.200 every time?
01:09:36.260 2,000 mules
01:09:37.060 hasn't panned
01:09:37.680 out, has it?
01:09:40.360 In my opinion,
01:09:41.720 2,000 mules has
01:09:42.720 not been
01:09:43.160 demonstrated to
01:09:45.200 some level of
01:09:45.900 certainty.
01:09:46.860 I would say
01:09:47.500 that's another one
01:09:48.140 that hasn't
01:09:48.460 panned out, which
01:09:49.760 doesn't mean it's
01:09:50.320 not true, it
01:09:51.800 just hasn't
01:09:52.220 panned out.
01:09:52.720 Yeah, so I
01:09:58.640 would say that I
01:10:01.500 don't have an
01:10:02.240 opinion of
01:10:02.800 whether Carrie
01:10:03.360 Lake's claims
01:10:05.440 are accurate, or
01:10:06.720 enough that they
01:10:07.360 would have changed
01:10:07.800 the election.
01:10:08.620 So I don't have
01:10:09.340 an opinion on
01:10:09.940 that.
01:10:12.140 I do have an
01:10:13.140 opinion that if
01:10:14.780 I were looking at
01:10:15.480 it from space, I
01:10:17.380 would say there's
01:10:17.920 a 95% chance it
01:10:19.740 either can't be
01:10:20.900 proven, or it
01:10:22.360 will be shown to
01:10:23.080 be irrelevant to
01:10:23.880 the courts because
01:10:24.780 of what the
01:10:25.240 courts consider
01:10:26.660 their domain and
01:10:27.460 what isn't.
01:10:30.220 Is that fair?
01:10:31.640 Is it a fair
01:10:32.700 position?
01:10:33.380 I genuinely don't
01:10:34.420 have any way to
01:10:35.400 know if her
01:10:36.580 claims are good,
01:10:37.520 and I also don't
01:10:38.620 have any sense of
01:10:40.180 whether she could
01:10:40.820 be fooled by
01:10:41.640 false claims,
01:10:43.160 because I think
01:10:43.660 we all can.
01:10:44.960 I mean, you
01:10:45.320 remember me
01:10:45.880 thinking that the
01:10:46.580 Kraken was real,
01:10:48.480 right?
01:10:49.020 I consider myself
01:10:50.120 a sophisticated
01:10:51.420 consumer of
01:10:52.340 news, and
01:10:53.660 when somebody
01:10:54.120 with a good
01:10:54.740 reputation stands
01:10:55.880 in front of the
01:10:56.380 world and says,
01:10:57.620 I'm going to
01:10:58.020 show you the
01:10:58.460 Kraken tomorrow,
01:11:00.300 I believed it.
01:11:01.820 I mean, I just
01:11:02.300 took it on face
01:11:02.900 value.
01:11:03.300 It's like, oh,
01:11:03.780 good reputation?
01:11:05.040 You wouldn't make
01:11:05.700 that kind of claim
01:11:06.420 unless you had the
01:11:07.020 goods.
01:11:08.060 And then it
01:11:08.820 turns out, I
01:11:11.180 think she was
01:11:12.520 bamboozled.
01:11:14.020 I think she
01:11:14.680 believed it, but
01:11:15.360 she was bamboozled.
01:11:16.800 So, do you
01:11:17.900 think, is there
01:11:18.480 anything that you
01:11:18.960 know about Carrie
01:11:19.680 Lake, they
01:11:21.100 would tell you
01:11:21.580 that she would
01:11:22.060 be less gullible
01:11:24.120 than Sidney
01:11:26.680 Powell?
01:11:28.420 What is it you
01:11:29.300 know about the
01:11:29.880 two of them?
01:11:31.120 You'd say, oh,
01:11:32.140 Sidney Powell was
01:11:33.300 gullible in that
01:11:34.660 case, but Carrie
01:11:37.140 Lake would never
01:11:37.820 fall for that
01:11:38.560 trick.
01:11:39.880 I don't know.
01:11:41.340 Because I've seen
01:11:42.300 even myself fall for
01:11:43.860 that trick, right?
01:11:45.640 How many of you
01:11:46.440 fell for it?
01:11:47.020 How many of you
01:11:47.880 thought the
01:11:48.280 Kraken was
01:11:48.820 coming?
01:11:49.680 Didn't we all
01:11:50.200 fall for it?
01:11:52.640 I'll bet you 80%
01:11:53.920 of the people
01:11:54.420 watching this
01:11:55.240 live stream fell
01:11:56.680 for the Kraken
01:11:57.380 because you thought
01:11:58.580 Sidney Powell was
01:11:59.440 a credible person
01:12:00.440 because the news
01:12:01.500 told you she was.
01:12:02.780 I watched Fox
01:12:03.740 News, and Fox
01:12:05.220 News kept saying,
01:12:06.000 oh, yeah,
01:12:07.440 Sidney Powell,
01:12:08.120 she's the real
01:12:08.600 deal.
01:12:09.660 Been around
01:12:10.100 forever, good
01:12:11.380 reputation.
01:12:12.400 I believed it.
01:12:13.300 Now, I also
01:12:15.140 believe Carrie
01:12:16.640 Lake is smart
01:12:17.960 and capable
01:12:18.500 and has a good
01:12:19.140 reputation.
01:12:20.620 Exactly what I
01:12:21.560 thought about
01:12:22.160 Sidney Powell.
01:12:23.820 So, having made
01:12:25.360 the exact mistake
01:12:26.640 before of
01:12:28.740 listening to a,
01:12:29.700 what I thought
01:12:30.320 was a credible,
01:12:31.800 high-powered,
01:12:32.780 successful woman
01:12:33.640 telling me
01:12:34.760 something, and
01:12:35.420 the woman part's
01:12:36.080 unimportant, a
01:12:37.440 high-powered,
01:12:37.940 successful person
01:12:38.740 telling me something
01:12:40.160 was true and I was
01:12:40.880 going to see it
01:12:41.280 tomorrow, I don't
01:12:42.940 know, you kind
01:12:43.540 of believe that
01:12:44.080 for at least a
01:12:44.760 day until it
01:12:45.760 doesn't happen.
01:12:49.860 All right.
01:12:50.860 So, here's the
01:12:52.340 other thing you
01:12:52.760 need to know
01:12:53.180 about Carrie
01:12:54.080 Lake and her
01:12:55.800 situation.
01:12:57.280 So, this is
01:12:58.080 independent from
01:12:58.860 the personality.
01:13:00.320 This would be
01:13:00.900 true of anybody
01:13:01.500 in her situation.
01:13:03.360 They would be
01:13:04.040 in cognitive
01:13:04.760 dissonance.
01:13:06.480 You could take
01:13:07.060 Carrie Lake
01:13:07.580 out of this
01:13:07.960 situation, just
01:13:08.840 take her out,
01:13:09.940 and plop in
01:13:10.700 anybody you
01:13:11.360 choose.
01:13:11.740 the smartest,
01:13:13.200 wisest person
01:13:13.840 you know.
01:13:14.260 Just put them
01:13:14.700 in her exact
01:13:15.440 situation.
01:13:16.580 How would
01:13:16.960 they feel?
01:13:18.760 Exactly the
01:13:19.420 way she feels.
01:13:21.520 The evidence
01:13:22.600 and what we
01:13:23.300 all watched
01:13:23.980 would make
01:13:24.940 anyone feel
01:13:26.020 the way she
01:13:26.500 feels.
01:13:27.320 But does
01:13:27.700 that mean
01:13:28.080 she's right?
01:13:30.660 No.
01:13:31.440 It means she
01:13:32.000 had a perfect
01:13:32.760 situation for
01:13:33.660 cognitive dissonance.
01:13:35.360 She had the
01:13:35.880 trigger.
01:13:36.860 Look for the
01:13:37.540 trigger.
01:13:38.480 The trigger is
01:13:39.160 there.
01:13:40.000 The trigger is
01:13:40.700 that she was
01:13:41.000 positive she
01:13:41.600 won.
01:13:42.020 That was her
01:13:42.440 worldview, or
01:13:43.380 that she would.
01:13:44.600 At some point
01:13:45.140 she was probably
01:13:45.560 sure.
01:13:46.660 And then it
01:13:47.480 didn't happen.
01:13:49.020 That's a trigger
01:13:49.820 for cognitive
01:13:50.500 dissonance.
01:13:51.760 Anybody you put
01:13:52.460 there would
01:13:53.720 think it was
01:13:54.160 rigged.
01:13:54.880 Anybody.
01:13:55.860 And I think
01:13:56.380 the same for
01:13:56.840 Trump.
01:13:58.920 Trump is
01:13:59.560 different because
01:14:00.140 he'll say out
01:14:00.820 loud it was
01:14:01.380 rigged as many
01:14:02.180 times as he
01:14:03.380 wants, no matter
01:14:04.240 how many times
01:14:04.800 you tell him
01:14:05.200 not to.
01:14:06.200 So that's
01:14:06.620 different about
01:14:07.120 Trump.
01:14:07.440 But you
01:14:08.260 don't think
01:14:08.800 that everybody
01:14:09.320 who loses
01:14:09.760 an election
01:14:10.300 that's close
01:14:10.960 and sketchy
01:14:11.540 looking thinks
01:14:12.080 it's rigged.
01:14:12.880 They all
01:14:13.460 do, of
01:14:14.300 course.
01:14:15.420 Of course
01:14:16.020 they do.
01:14:16.900 Trump believes
01:14:17.540 what anybody
01:14:18.280 would believe
01:14:18.900 in his
01:14:19.800 situation.
01:14:21.100 Carrie
01:14:21.340 Lake believes
01:14:21.920 what anybody
01:14:22.620 would believe
01:14:23.180 in that
01:14:23.500 situation,
01:14:24.140 including me.
01:14:25.620 Right?
01:14:26.380 So if it
01:14:26.980 turns out she's
01:14:27.600 wrong, trust
01:14:29.460 me, I would
01:14:30.100 have been wrong
01:14:30.640 in that same
01:14:31.420 situation.
01:14:32.240 And so would
01:14:32.700 you.
01:14:33.240 So would
01:14:33.580 you.
01:14:34.700 Yeah.
01:14:35.140 She's in an
01:14:36.160 impossible
01:14:36.640 situation.
01:14:37.940 It's basically
01:14:38.760 a cognitive
01:14:39.660 dissonance
01:14:40.260 vice grip.
01:14:41.820 She could be
01:14:42.440 totally right.
01:14:43.920 I'm not
01:14:44.280 going to, I
01:14:45.080 don't even have
01:14:45.580 an opinion
01:14:45.980 of what's
01:14:46.320 likely, honestly.
01:14:47.620 She could be
01:14:48.100 totally right.
01:14:49.720 But she is
01:14:50.360 in the grip
01:14:50.920 of cognitive
01:14:51.720 dissonance
01:14:52.340 where whether
01:14:53.640 she's right
01:14:54.240 or wrong,
01:14:54.700 she's only
01:14:55.100 going to see
01:14:55.500 one side.
01:14:57.180 Now if that
01:14:57.720 side is the
01:14:58.320 correct side,
01:14:59.180 well, good
01:14:59.860 for her.
01:15:01.020 But her
01:15:02.780 level of
01:15:03.340 certainty and
01:15:04.920 the amount
01:15:05.580 of evidence
01:15:06.220 she says
01:15:06.700 she has,
01:15:07.760 which sounds
01:15:08.400 pretty important,
01:15:10.980 you can't
01:15:11.880 really trust
01:15:12.340 it at this
01:15:12.740 point in
01:15:14.180 the process.
01:15:17.200 Are you
01:15:18.020 kidding me
01:15:19.340 that Trump
01:15:20.360 made a major
01:15:21.000 announcement
01:15:21.480 and it was
01:15:21.940 super stupid
01:15:24.480 digital trading
01:15:25.440 cards?
01:15:26.680 Oh, please
01:15:27.300 tell me that
01:15:27.840 wasn't it.
01:15:29.420 Oh.
01:15:30.940 Oh.
01:15:32.500 Really?
01:15:32.940 Oh, God.
01:15:38.960 Yeah.
01:15:40.520 Do you see
01:15:41.260 the analytical
01:15:43.260 problem that
01:15:44.200 I made here
01:15:44.780 where I was
01:15:46.800 speculating that
01:15:47.460 you might be
01:15:47.920 announcing, you
01:15:48.780 know, Carrie
01:15:49.220 Lake as VP?
01:15:50.980 Carrie Lake as
01:15:51.800 VP is what old
01:15:52.760 Trump might have
01:15:53.440 done.
01:15:55.240 2015 Trump
01:15:56.300 might have done
01:15:56.960 that, like if
01:15:57.800 he had been in
01:15:58.280 this situation in
01:15:59.080 2015.
01:15:59.520 I think past
01:16:01.920 Trump would
01:16:02.520 have made a
01:16:04.080 bigger play.
01:16:05.660 I don't think
01:16:06.160 past Trump would
01:16:06.960 have said it's a
01:16:08.180 big announcement
01:16:08.720 about digital
01:16:09.440 trading cards.
01:16:10.700 Now, is it a
01:16:11.140 fundraiser?
01:16:12.380 Is he using it
01:16:13.340 as his fundraiser?
01:16:14.440 Is that what it
01:16:14.800 is?
01:16:18.960 Yeah.
01:16:20.300 Oh, it's a
01:16:21.000 Trump card.
01:16:22.000 Or is it a
01:16:22.480 Trump card?
01:16:24.640 Yeah, it's like
01:16:25.340 he quit, huh?
01:16:26.700 Doesn't it look
01:16:27.320 like he's just
01:16:27.880 playing it for
01:16:28.900 business purposes?
01:16:32.200 I mean, that's
01:16:32.620 what we thought
01:16:33.040 the first time he
01:16:33.700 ran.
01:16:34.480 He surprised us.
01:16:39.460 All right.
01:16:39.980 I just have to
01:16:40.800 see on Twitter
01:16:41.420 what people are
01:16:42.020 saying about
01:16:42.420 this.
01:16:45.300 Actually, I
01:16:45.800 would look on
01:16:46.240 Truth Social
01:16:47.140 because it's
01:16:47.600 probably on
01:16:47.980 there, right?
01:16:49.900 Let's find the
01:16:50.640 actual announcement.
01:16:54.600 Trump, Trump,
01:16:55.300 Trump.
01:16:56.040 Trump, Trump,
01:16:58.760 Trump.
01:16:59.460 You've probably
01:17:00.100 already found it
01:17:00.760 and you're telling
01:17:01.180 me right now.
01:17:02.740 But I'm looking
01:17:03.480 down.
01:17:03.880 I don't see it.
01:17:05.780 All right.
01:17:06.240 My official
01:17:06.800 Donald Trump
01:17:08.100 digital trading
01:17:09.100 card collection
01:17:09.720 is here.
01:17:11.500 These limited
01:17:12.240 edition cards
01:17:13.020 feature amazing
01:17:13.820 art of my life
01:17:14.740 and career.
01:17:17.300 Get your
01:17:17.900 cards now,
01:17:18.560 $99 each.
01:17:22.500 All right.
01:17:23.140 I think I
01:17:26.160 know who the
01:17:26.620 artist is,
01:17:27.240 but I have
01:17:27.540 to confirm
01:17:28.180 that.
01:17:29.740 If the
01:17:30.300 artist is
01:17:30.760 who I think
01:17:31.480 it is,
01:17:31.820 it's somebody
01:17:32.600 you're going
01:17:32.920 to like.
01:17:34.540 Somebody you've
01:17:35.160 seen on
01:17:35.480 Twitter.
01:17:38.360 So,
01:17:40.240 Trump trading
01:17:41.680 cards for
01:17:42.180 $99.
01:17:42.700 Wait, is this
01:17:44.600 for the campaign
01:17:45.340 or for himself?
01:17:47.860 It's just a
01:17:48.420 Christmas gift.
01:17:49.100 Trump digital
01:17:51.540 cards or
01:17:52.200 NFTs.
01:17:55.780 Well,
01:17:56.640 so,
01:17:57.880 you may not
01:17:58.900 know this
01:17:59.260 about NFTs.
01:18:00.380 So, an NFT
01:18:01.000 is a digital,
01:18:02.820 it's usually
01:18:03.460 art,
01:18:04.420 digital art,
01:18:05.700 that because
01:18:06.160 of the
01:18:06.380 blockchain,
01:18:06.960 you can know
01:18:07.480 who the real
01:18:08.120 owner is.
01:18:09.080 And if anybody
01:18:09.560 has a copy,
01:18:10.480 they're not the
01:18:10.900 real owner,
01:18:11.760 because only the
01:18:12.400 blockchain tells
01:18:13.260 you who the
01:18:13.620 real owner is.
01:18:15.080 So,
01:18:16.080 but one of the
01:18:16.840 things that a
01:18:17.840 NFT does,
01:18:20.440 that's different
01:18:20.900 from regular
01:18:21.560 art,
01:18:22.300 is that if you
01:18:23.460 create it with
01:18:24.780 a feature that
01:18:26.360 would give you
01:18:26.960 a percentage every
01:18:28.120 time it's resold
01:18:29.080 to anybody any
01:18:30.140 time in the
01:18:30.640 future,
01:18:31.580 because you can
01:18:32.040 do that because
01:18:32.560 everything goes
01:18:33.100 back to the
01:18:33.560 blockchain,
01:18:35.680 you could make
01:18:36.680 a huge amount
01:18:37.720 of money selling
01:18:39.140 something for a
01:18:39.940 dollar.
01:18:41.160 Let me make
01:18:42.080 the case.
01:18:42.980 Let's say that
01:18:43.680 Trump sold one
01:18:44.740 card for one
01:18:46.260 dollar.
01:18:47.840 And that's
01:18:48.240 it.
01:18:49.820 And Buddy
01:18:50.260 said,
01:18:50.760 anybody who
01:18:51.540 resells this,
01:18:52.400 I get 10%.
01:18:53.360 So the
01:18:54.440 dollar resells
01:18:55.500 it for $2,
01:18:56.800 and he gets
01:18:58.080 10% of that.
01:18:59.060 The $2 sells
01:19:00.200 it for $4,
01:19:01.180 and Trump
01:19:01.500 gets 10%
01:19:02.500 of that.
01:19:04.940 He could
01:19:05.560 make a
01:19:05.860 billion dollars.
01:19:08.420 All that
01:19:09.040 matters is
01:19:09.560 people sell
01:19:10.140 it and
01:19:10.380 resell it.
01:19:11.440 That's all
01:19:11.820 that matters.
01:19:13.020 If they do,
01:19:13.920 if they like
01:19:14.500 trading and
01:19:15.780 trying to build
01:19:16.320 a full set
01:19:18.200 and stuff,
01:19:19.400 then they
01:19:19.820 will be
01:19:20.080 buying and
01:19:20.600 selling,
01:19:21.560 and he
01:19:22.280 would get
01:19:22.600 10% or
01:19:23.860 whatever he
01:19:24.300 specified of
01:19:25.620 every trade.
01:19:29.320 Well,
01:19:29.840 you say
01:19:30.120 nobody would
01:19:30.640 buy it
01:19:31.080 at $99.
01:19:33.780 Would you
01:19:34.340 buy it at
01:19:34.760 $99 if you
01:19:35.980 knew you
01:19:36.300 could sell
01:19:36.720 it for
01:19:37.020 $120?
01:19:39.120 Because it's
01:19:39.760 almost guaranteed
01:19:40.500 that you can.
01:19:41.060 it's like
01:19:43.680 free money.
01:19:44.620 The first
01:19:45.040 people who
01:19:45.440 buy it
01:19:45.760 are just
01:19:46.040 going to
01:19:46.240 be flipping
01:19:47.100 it over
01:19:47.500 for free
01:19:47.980 money.
01:19:48.960 That's how
01:19:49.360 NFTs work.
01:19:51.040 So you'd
01:19:52.000 have to think
01:19:52.560 that nobody
01:19:53.120 would buy
01:19:53.640 one for
01:19:55.100 you not
01:19:55.480 to buy
01:19:55.780 one.
01:19:56.540 If you
01:19:56.880 thought people
01:19:57.300 would buy
01:19:57.740 them,
01:19:58.120 this would
01:19:58.420 be the
01:19:58.680 day to
01:19:58.940 buy it.
01:19:59.680 Because it
01:20:00.100 should be
01:20:00.440 more expensive
01:20:01.060 every day
01:20:01.600 after this.
01:20:03.060 That's why
01:20:03.720 people get
01:20:04.200 in fast.
01:20:06.340 It'd be
01:20:06.940 weird if
01:20:07.420 this could
01:20:09.180 easily turn
01:20:09.780 out to be
01:20:10.780 the main
01:20:11.260 thing that
01:20:11.640 happens.
01:20:12.500 Like it
01:20:12.780 could be
01:20:13.040 bigger than
01:20:13.420 the election.
01:20:14.440 He could
01:20:14.760 actually make
01:20:15.260 a billion
01:20:15.600 dollars.
01:20:16.660 That's within
01:20:17.300 the realm
01:20:17.720 of possibility.
01:20:18.880 He could
01:20:19.140 make a
01:20:19.420 billion
01:20:19.640 dollars.
01:20:22.260 All right,
01:20:23.000 well, I
01:20:25.080 think you'd
01:20:25.560 agree it
01:20:25.920 doesn't look
01:20:26.360 like he's
01:20:26.700 running for
01:20:27.100 president,
01:20:27.560 really, does
01:20:28.080 it?
01:20:30.920 Is there
01:20:31.520 anything, do
01:20:32.500 you remember
01:20:32.900 when Trump
01:20:33.740 first got
01:20:34.200 elected in
01:20:34.720 2016, that
01:20:36.560 he and Pence
01:20:37.280 immediately went
01:20:38.080 on this
01:20:38.700 tour,
01:20:39.780 as if
01:20:40.200 they were
01:20:40.480 already in
01:20:40.840 office, like
01:20:41.580 months before
01:20:42.180 they were in
01:20:42.500 office, they
01:20:43.440 were traveling
01:20:43.940 around acting
01:20:44.760 like they were
01:20:45.260 already on the
01:20:45.840 job.
01:20:46.780 And I kept
01:20:47.280 saying how
01:20:47.800 brilliant that
01:20:48.340 was, because
01:20:49.060 that's your
01:20:49.360 first impression.
01:20:50.840 And you
01:20:52.560 don't think
01:20:53.080 that if he
01:20:53.580 were seriously
01:20:54.260 trying to get
01:20:54.940 re-elected, you
01:20:56.380 don't think he'd
01:20:56.940 be out there
01:20:57.360 every day?
01:20:58.520 Already?
01:21:00.740 You think
01:21:01.340 that announcing
01:21:02.800 the digital
01:21:03.480 greeting cards
01:21:04.220 is what he
01:21:05.240 does if he's
01:21:05.960 really running
01:21:06.460 for president?
01:21:09.820 He still
01:21:10.520 sells out
01:21:10.960 in stadiums
01:21:11.540 because he's
01:21:11.920 entertaining.
01:21:12.960 Yeah.
01:21:13.640 But wouldn't
01:21:14.620 he be selling
01:21:15.300 them out
01:21:15.680 today?
01:21:16.660 Wouldn't there
01:21:17.120 be a rally
01:21:17.600 this weekend
01:21:18.240 and the one
01:21:18.740 after?
01:21:19.560 I mean, I
01:21:19.880 think you'd
01:21:20.240 have to be
01:21:20.660 on at least
01:21:22.180 a rally a week
01:21:23.080 mode a year
01:21:25.260 before the
01:21:25.820 serious campaigning
01:21:26.880 goes on, if
01:21:28.120 you're serious.
01:21:30.640 And maybe
01:21:31.020 it'll cake
01:21:31.840 into it pretty
01:21:32.340 soon.
01:21:33.240 All right, we'll
01:21:33.680 see.
01:21:38.760 Yeah, I
01:21:39.300 think the
01:21:39.660 DeSantis
01:21:40.100 poll kicked
01:21:42.240 his butt a
01:21:42.780 little bit.
01:21:46.160 Maybe 0.02%
01:21:47.460 of people have
01:21:48.000 heard of
01:21:48.280 NFTs.
01:21:49.480 Yeah, but
01:21:50.580 that didn't
01:21:50.960 really hurt
01:21:51.360 the NFT
01:21:52.320 market.
01:21:53.100 What hurt
01:21:53.400 the NFT
01:21:53.820 market is
01:21:54.500 probably FTX
01:21:55.840 and just the
01:21:56.380 collapse of
01:21:56.940 crypto in
01:21:58.000 general.
01:22:03.680 Yeah, he
01:22:04.640 might need
01:22:05.280 the money
01:22:06.740 just for
01:22:07.180 his legal
01:22:08.320 battles.
01:22:19.060 What's the
01:22:19.680 Dilbert NFT
01:22:20.400 going for?
01:22:21.480 Good question.
01:22:22.660 Want me to
01:22:23.040 check?
01:22:25.960 I don't
01:22:26.520 have my
01:22:26.860 password with
01:22:27.420 me, so
01:22:27.820 never mind.
01:22:28.320 I don't
01:22:30.740 think anybody's
01:22:31.260 buying it.
01:22:32.420 I think
01:22:32.820 whoever owns
01:22:33.440 it is just
01:22:33.980 sitting on
01:22:34.360 it.
01:22:41.840 His
01:22:42.280 announcement
01:22:42.800 when he
01:22:43.160 said he
01:22:43.440 was running
01:22:43.780 was terrible
01:22:44.280 too, yes.
01:22:47.960 Crypto
01:22:48.480 crash coming
01:22:49.100 big time.
01:22:52.160 You can
01:22:53.000 do the
01:22:53.560 math.
01:22:55.940 Happy
01:22:56.260 IDOC.
01:22:56.720 everything's
01:22:58.400 public.
01:22:58.980 You know
01:22:59.220 how many
01:22:59.560 subscribers I
01:23:01.160 have and
01:23:01.680 you know
01:23:02.020 what you
01:23:02.360 pay for
01:23:02.680 it.
01:23:08.320 He's
01:23:08.720 being
01:23:08.920 ruthlessly
01:23:09.460 mocked on
01:23:10.040 Twitter about
01:23:10.560 it, even
01:23:10.920 on the
01:23:11.180 right.
01:23:12.600 Yeah, I'm
01:23:12.960 not surprised.
01:23:21.840 If I had
01:23:22.460 to make a
01:23:22.860 prediction,
01:23:23.780 and I
01:23:24.260 will,
01:23:24.660 the
01:23:27.660 destruction
01:23:28.340 of the
01:23:28.980 crypto
01:23:29.700 market
01:23:30.120 reminds me
01:23:30.800 of the
01:23:31.240 early
01:23:31.720 personal
01:23:32.520 computer
01:23:32.960 market.
01:23:34.200 Do you
01:23:34.340 remember
01:23:34.520 when
01:23:34.740 personal
01:23:35.100 computers
01:23:35.620 were
01:23:37.120 sort of
01:23:38.540 a big
01:23:38.820 thing,
01:23:39.620 and there
01:23:40.220 were a
01:23:40.320 whole bunch
01:23:40.640 of little
01:23:40.960 companies
01:23:41.340 that made
01:23:41.640 personal
01:23:42.020 computers?
01:23:43.480 But you
01:23:43.920 knew it
01:23:44.240 was going
01:23:44.520 to be,
01:23:45.020 you thought
01:23:45.700 it was
01:23:45.900 going to
01:23:46.060 be,
01:23:46.360 you know,
01:23:46.840 IBM and
01:23:47.700 Apple in
01:23:49.240 the end.
01:23:50.260 IBM didn't
01:23:50.980 make it to
01:23:51.360 the end.
01:23:51.700 crypto is
01:23:55.840 going to
01:23:56.060 go the
01:23:56.720 way computers
01:23:57.380 did,
01:23:58.140 which is
01:23:58.700 there's no
01:23:59.220 way crypto
01:23:59.780 goes away.
01:24:01.600 I think
01:24:02.260 there's just
01:24:02.560 no way it
01:24:03.040 goes away.
01:24:03.800 But all
01:24:04.440 the shit
01:24:05.340 coins,
01:24:05.880 so-called,
01:24:06.540 will go
01:24:06.900 away.
01:24:07.700 So all
01:24:08.080 of the
01:24:08.440 weak
01:24:08.980 competitors
01:24:09.560 will go
01:24:10.020 away.
01:24:10.260 I think
01:24:11.600 Bitcoin will
01:24:12.320 still be
01:24:12.720 standing.
01:24:14.860 Don't make
01:24:15.700 any investments
01:24:16.980 based on
01:24:18.200 anything I
01:24:18.920 say about
01:24:19.340 crypto.
01:24:19.700 It's my
01:24:20.860 weakest
01:24:21.260 category,
01:24:22.220 right?
01:24:22.980 If you
01:24:23.500 thought I
01:24:23.840 said something
01:24:24.360 smart in
01:24:24.840 some other
01:24:25.220 category,
01:24:25.920 that does
01:24:26.540 not extend
01:24:27.100 to crypto.
01:24:29.520 I'm just
01:24:30.220 treading water
01:24:30.800 with everybody
01:24:31.300 else on
01:24:31.700 crypto.
01:24:32.440 But it
01:24:32.780 does seem
01:24:33.160 to be
01:24:33.420 that the
01:24:33.780 likely thing
01:24:34.580 is it
01:24:38.060 will be
01:24:38.400 maybe too
01:24:39.440 standing in
01:24:40.140 the end.
01:24:41.140 Maybe it's
01:24:41.620 Ethereum for
01:24:43.120 its functional
01:24:44.040 purposes.
01:24:45.400 Maybe it's
01:24:45.900 Bitcoin because
01:24:46.920 it's the one
01:24:48.040 everybody knows.
01:24:48.920 I don't know.
01:24:49.700 But I think
01:24:50.500 there'll be
01:24:50.800 at least
01:24:51.180 two in
01:24:51.680 the end.
01:24:52.700 But I
01:24:53.320 don't think
01:24:53.800 that it's
01:24:55.480 going away.
01:25:00.320 Looks like
01:25:00.980 23 rates
01:25:01.980 are going to
01:25:02.480 persist in
01:25:03.160 real estate
01:25:03.720 correction.
01:25:04.600 Yeah.
01:25:05.900 Did you
01:25:06.440 find out
01:25:06.800 who Satoshi
01:25:07.400 is yet?
01:25:09.080 Well,
01:25:09.680 I didn't.
01:25:10.240 now,
01:25:16.240 you know,
01:25:16.440 it's
01:25:16.560 interesting.
01:25:17.020 So you
01:25:17.240 know that
01:25:17.720 associated
01:25:19.020 with my
01:25:19.620 startup that
01:25:20.400 is no
01:25:20.720 more,
01:25:21.420 we created
01:25:22.080 a token
01:25:22.760 called the
01:25:23.260 WEN,
01:25:23.940 W-H-E-N.
01:25:25.540 Now,
01:25:25.840 the interesting
01:25:26.300 thing about a
01:25:26.920 token is that
01:25:27.500 once you
01:25:27.880 create it,
01:25:29.080 it never
01:25:29.420 goes away.
01:25:31.040 Right?
01:25:31.380 Like,
01:25:31.760 it doesn't
01:25:32.280 wear out or
01:25:33.480 you know,
01:25:35.140 it doesn't
01:25:35.600 time out.
01:25:36.900 It's just
01:25:37.280 there forever.
01:25:38.560 So,
01:25:39.180 someday in
01:25:39.820 the future,
01:25:40.380 if anybody
01:25:40.720 wanted to
01:25:41.760 create a
01:25:42.800 business around
01:25:43.500 the WEN token,
01:25:45.000 they could go
01:25:45.600 to the one
01:25:46.400 exchange where
01:25:47.060 you buy them.
01:25:48.520 I think there's
01:25:49.060 probably one
01:25:49.520 left.
01:25:50.220 And you just
01:25:51.040 buy them all
01:25:51.660 for some,
01:25:54.040 you know,
01:25:54.380 almost nothing.
01:25:55.480 And then you
01:25:56.040 would have a
01:25:56.380 crypto.
01:25:57.460 You would,
01:25:57.980 I think Hotbit
01:25:58.780 is,
01:25:59.120 Hotbit.io is
01:25:59.920 the only place.
01:26:01.100 And if it's
01:26:02.940 still there,
01:26:03.380 I'm not even
01:26:03.800 sure if it's
01:26:04.180 still there.
01:26:07.480 No,
01:26:07.920 I didn't
01:26:08.180 finish the
01:26:08.920 Ed Kelter
01:26:10.060 interview.
01:26:15.340 Anyway.
01:26:18.120 Yeah,
01:26:18.560 the Senate
01:26:18.880 banned TikTok
01:26:20.040 on government
01:26:20.780 devices.
01:26:21.780 Now,
01:26:22.000 how in the
01:26:22.480 world can
01:26:23.720 they ban
01:26:24.120 it on
01:26:24.420 government
01:26:24.860 devices and
01:26:25.920 then not
01:26:26.660 ban it on
01:26:27.800 the public's
01:26:28.440 devices?
01:26:31.980 When was
01:26:32.780 that?
01:26:33.380 Now,
01:26:33.740 also,
01:26:34.120 the reason
01:26:34.440 that the
01:26:34.840 when is
01:26:35.880 likely to
01:26:36.780 have future
01:26:37.620 value,
01:26:38.640 do you know
01:26:38.980 why?
01:26:40.140 Do you know
01:26:40.500 why the
01:26:40.920 when crypto
01:26:42.500 that currently
01:26:43.660 has basically
01:26:44.480 no value,
01:26:45.500 do you know
01:26:45.880 why I think
01:26:46.340 it will have
01:26:46.780 a value in
01:26:47.280 the future?
01:26:48.900 Because of
01:26:49.480 the name.
01:26:50.680 The name.
01:26:52.620 Someday,
01:26:53.260 somewhere,
01:26:54.180 for some
01:26:55.300 function,
01:26:56.760 somebody is
01:26:57.360 going to need
01:26:57.740 a token
01:26:58.200 token that
01:27:00.340 says something
01:27:01.640 about time.
01:27:02.860 Because somebody
01:27:03.440 is going to
01:27:03.780 build a
01:27:04.560 company or
01:27:05.320 an app that
01:27:06.900 they have a
01:27:08.140 time-related
01:27:08.940 element to
01:27:09.620 it, and
01:27:10.400 they're going
01:27:10.680 to say,
01:27:11.200 why would
01:27:11.740 we invent
01:27:13.000 a token
01:27:13.480 when the
01:27:14.840 when is
01:27:15.260 almost free?
01:27:16.800 We'll just
01:27:17.320 grab it and
01:27:18.640 incorporate it.
01:27:19.900 So, if you
01:27:20.820 want one that
01:27:21.300 has a perfect
01:27:21.800 name and is
01:27:22.320 already created
01:27:23.080 and you don't
01:27:23.580 have to worry
01:27:23.980 about it being
01:27:24.440 wrong, because
01:27:25.800 it's already
01:27:26.180 there, somebody
01:27:27.760 can just adopt
01:27:28.500 it, put it
01:27:29.060 in their own
01:27:29.420 company, and
01:27:30.360 then, you
01:27:31.220 know, whatever
01:27:31.580 few shares I
01:27:32.520 have might
01:27:33.160 have some
01:27:33.620 tiny value.
01:27:37.380 It's
01:27:37.780 W-H-E-N.
01:27:42.860 Yeah,
01:27:43.740 W-H-E-N.
01:27:45.900 All right,
01:27:46.500 that's all for
01:27:46.920 now.
01:27:47.160 I'm going to
01:27:47.420 go do something
01:27:47.820 else.
01:27:48.420 I'll talk to
01:27:48.920 you tomorrow.
01:27:51.360 Bye, YouTube.
01:27:54.440 Bye.