Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1964 Scott Adams： Why The Country Doesn't Agree On Vaccinations. You Won't Like It

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the Highlight of Civilization, Coffee with Scott Adams.

00:00:10.400 There's never been a finer moment, and today, I don't want to get you too excited, in case anybody's got high blood pressure,

00:00:18.900 but there will be two whiteboards today. No! Calm down, calm down. Two whiteboards. You can handle it.

00:00:26.000 And if you'd like to get ready for this, the coup de grace, the height of everything,

00:00:34.340 well, all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or chalice or stein, a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:40.580 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.

00:00:44.620 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure. It's the dopamine of the day. I think it makes everything better.

00:00:50.180 It's cold. The simultaneous sip. Go.

00:00:56.000 Well, Broker, Natalie, I feel the same way about you.

00:01:04.460 We've never been met, but that's how confident I am in your qualities.

00:01:10.940 Well, let's see. Let's see how smart my audience is.

00:01:16.260 I'll tell you that I'm going to prime you with one fact, and then I'm going to stop it. Stop it.

00:01:24.480 Local. The local subscribers are so smart, they answer my questions before I even ask them.

00:01:29.880 Hold on. Hold on.

00:01:32.540 So according to Rasmussen, 42% of voters believe most members of Congress are corrupt.

00:01:37.940 Just let that absorb for a moment.

00:01:44.020 We'll get to the next question.

00:01:46.200 42% of voters believe members of Congress are corrupt.

00:01:50.440 That doesn't seem good, does it?

00:01:53.600 It makes you wonder what the number has to be before the system crumbles.

00:01:58.820 But probably it could be 85% and the system would be stable.

00:02:02.180 Because nobody knows what to do about it.

00:02:05.120 You're like, yeah, I don't know what to do about it.

00:02:07.900 Because it's not like, here's what people don't say.

00:02:11.220 Here's what they don't say.

00:02:13.220 Boy, the other team is corrupt.

00:02:16.080 Right?

00:02:17.920 Now, there's not something on my nose that's a boo-boo.

00:02:22.100 It's a scratch.

00:02:24.600 I know it's distracting because it's like right in the middle of my nose.

00:02:28.400 But it'll be gone eventually.

00:02:30.180 42% think Congress is corrupt.

00:02:35.760 All right.

00:02:36.140 So here's the big question.

00:02:42.660 What percentage of people, according to the Rasmussen poll,

00:02:46.960 what percentage of likely U.S. voters believe that Congress is doing a good or excellent job?

00:02:52.900 How many say they're doing a good or excellent job?

00:02:57.480 Amazing how well you do this.

00:03:00.180 25% is correct.

00:03:02.480 How did you do this?

00:03:04.760 Again, I have the smartest audience in the history of all live streams.

00:03:11.040 I think this is proof.

00:03:12.880 And by the way, by the time I'm done with you today, you will be the smartest audience.

00:03:17.020 I'm going to clear up something for you that by the end of this live stream, you're going

00:03:22.600 to say to yourself, oh, shit, I see it now.

00:03:26.560 Do you think I can do that?

00:03:28.520 Every one of you is going to have that.

00:03:30.180 Every one of you is going to say, oh, shit, I see the pattern now.

00:03:34.860 It's a pattern you haven't seen before.

00:03:36.260 And when you see it, you're going to go, shit, and everything will make sense.

00:03:43.380 Do you think I can deliver that?

00:03:45.600 I'm making a big claim so I can get you excited about thinking I can or cannot do it.

00:03:50.420 All right, all right.

00:03:51.980 Hold on.

00:03:52.540 We'll get to it.

00:03:53.580 I'm going to save it toward the end.

00:03:56.520 Well, I saw an interesting video today by Peter Zayn, who is claiming, and yeah, I don't

00:04:04.020 have sources for this, but I'll put it out there as one smart person saying smart things.

00:04:10.320 Sounded right to me.

00:04:11.320 It goes like this, that solar is overrated, solar power, and the argument is that the

00:04:22.400 peak demand for solar, or no, the peak demand for energy is what time of day?

00:04:27.300 Anybody?

00:04:28.080 What time of day does the night, peak demand is night?

00:04:34.400 So you already have a storage problem, right?

00:04:36.720 Now, someday, someday, there have been big breakthroughs in battery storage, so if there

00:04:42.000 are big breakthroughs in battery storage, we might have a whole different situation, but

00:04:46.000 we're not there yet.

00:04:48.080 Yeah, after 6 p.m., I think, is the peak load.

00:04:52.140 And then how many places on Earth have the right conditions for solar, where you can get

00:04:59.040 enough light?

00:05:00.640 Not that many.

00:05:01.760 Yeah, not that many.

00:05:02.820 Maybe 25%, something like that.

00:05:04.740 But it's a small percentage of the world, so that's the problem.

00:05:09.120 Then you have massive environmental problems in the creation of the actual solar panels.

00:05:15.200 You've got your slave labor, and you've got to use a massive amount of coal power.

00:05:21.020 I don't know why it needs to be coal.

00:05:22.620 I think it just is, because it's China.

00:05:26.320 In other words, it doesn't have to be coal, but that's just the way it's being done.

00:05:29.080 So you've got to use all this coal, carbon-wise.

00:05:33.960 It's a disaster in the production part of it.

00:05:37.100 But then you should make it up later, right?

00:05:39.440 And his argument is, in many places, you'll never make up the difference, because there

00:05:43.820 won't be enough sun, and there won't be enough sun at the right time.

00:05:47.460 Now, this is his argument, right?

00:05:48.940 I'm just presenting it as he presented it.

00:05:51.560 That's not necessarily my argument.

00:05:54.860 Now, he says that, compared to that, that wind is actually looking good.

00:06:01.300 And here's something I didn't know.

00:06:02.860 So this is a new factoid.

00:06:05.600 Apparently, the people who make windmills have learned, they probably knew it all along,

00:06:11.220 but they know how to do something about it now.

00:06:13.580 They learned that the higher the windmill, the more stable the air, and the more of it

00:06:19.500 there is, the more wind and the more stable.

00:06:21.780 But what they couldn't do easily before is to build a high enough tower.

00:06:26.840 And apparently, now they know how to do that.

00:06:29.320 Now, building a windmill also has a carbon footprint, right?

00:06:33.700 It's not free.

00:06:34.960 You know, you have to get materials and mine them, whatever the hell you're doing.

00:06:38.340 But apparently, it's allegedly way less of a carbon problem compared to solar.

00:06:46.500 And the other advantage is you can put the wind in certain places, and you can guarantee

00:06:54.820 that it'll work in those.

00:06:55.800 But wind doesn't work everywhere either.

00:06:58.880 So that's a new interesting fact, that if the wind is, or if the tower is high enough,

00:07:08.660 it's a whole different set of economics.

00:07:10.540 Did you know that?

00:07:11.800 How many people knew that?

00:07:13.720 That that's sort of a big deal, making them taller, could just change the whole economics.

00:07:19.740 I knew taller was better, but I didn't know it would make that much of a difference.

00:07:24.100 Yeah.

00:07:24.660 Okay.

00:07:25.440 Well, good to know.

00:07:26.340 So you are all more informed than the average person about green stuff.

00:07:31.940 And by the time I'm done, man, you're going to be smart.

00:07:34.720 All right.

00:07:35.080 A true story.

00:07:35.820 There's a French hospital.

00:07:38.340 That brought in an 88-year-old man, and his complaint was that he had a World War II artillery

00:07:45.900 shell lodged in his rectum.

00:07:48.620 It was eight inches long, about two inches in diameter.

00:07:51.640 And it was an unexploded World War II artillery shell.

00:07:54.940 And so he goes in the hospital with this artillery shell lodged deep within his rectum.

00:08:02.080 And what did the doctor say when he arrived?

00:08:08.640 Rectum.

00:08:09.540 It practically killed him.

00:08:12.580 I had to do that one.

00:08:14.240 All right.

00:08:14.540 We're going to start with the easy ones.

00:08:16.540 That's the one you could have done at home.

00:08:19.200 Could we agree that was not professional quality?

00:08:21.460 It was below my commercial level of humor.

00:08:28.020 But that's just the warm-up.

00:08:30.440 You didn't think I'm done, right?

00:08:32.620 Oh, no.

00:08:33.400 No.

00:08:33.820 If an 88-year-old man goes into a French hospital with an unexploded World War II ordinance up

00:08:40.560 his ass, do you think I'm going to do one joke and then go home?

00:08:45.080 Have you met me?

00:08:46.700 No.

00:08:47.780 No.

00:08:48.640 What was the other thing the doctor said when they saw what the problem was?

00:08:53.180 Fire in the hole.

00:08:56.960 Anybody?

00:08:58.460 Anybody?

00:08:59.820 Okay.

00:09:00.200 That's not my joke either.

00:09:01.320 That one's from Theodore.

00:09:04.600 Theodore Geftos.

00:09:06.160 Fire in the hole.

00:09:07.540 Now, he did it funnier.

00:09:08.660 He had a hole.

00:09:10.160 Fire in the A-hole.

00:09:11.360 But I thought you would get it without the A. 0.83

00:09:13.860 Fire in the hole.

00:09:14.860 Yeah.

00:09:16.740 But I don't think that the headline captured the entire beauty of this story.

00:09:23.640 Now we're going to take it up to professional level.

00:09:26.320 Are you ready?

00:09:27.220 So far, that was sort of amateur citizen-level jokes.

00:09:33.820 We started out easy.

00:09:35.800 Started out easy.

00:09:36.740 I went up to fire in the hole.

00:09:39.800 That's right on the borderline of commercial quality.

00:09:43.760 Now watch me take it up.

00:09:45.340 See, this will be the difference between the professionals and the amateurs.

00:09:49.660 And now, my professional-level joke.

00:09:58.500 Breaking.

00:10:00.260 Doctors ruin the world's best pull-my-finger gag. 1.00

00:10:06.380 Now that's professional level.

00:10:08.760 That's the difference.

00:10:10.360 See the difference?

00:10:11.700 Yeah.

00:10:11.940 That's professional-level humor.

00:10:14.080 It's very different.

00:10:14.760 All right, here's a provocative thought, courtesy of Doc Anarchy on Twitter.

00:10:23.920 Also has a substack you might be interested in.

00:10:28.980 And he asked this.

00:10:31.040 Now this is his opinion, right?

00:10:33.200 So I'm not giving you my opinion.

00:10:34.640 This is just a tweet.

00:10:35.440 He says,

00:10:36.940 The newest Twitter files showed the FBI was secretly persuading us to hate China, among other countries.

00:10:43.460 And then he asked this provocative question.

00:10:46.300 How sure are you that China hatred is organic?

00:10:49.840 Have you fallen for FBI propaganda?

00:10:53.600 Who made...

00:10:54.380 What do you think?

00:10:56.200 I love that question.

00:10:57.280 Do you think that our collective feeling about China happened because we read the news and formed our own opinions independently?

00:11:09.100 Do you know what the only real answer to that is?

00:11:11.760 There's only one real answer to that question.

00:11:14.920 You can't know.

00:11:16.900 You can't know.

00:11:18.360 It's unknowable.

00:11:19.880 And it's actually a very good question.

00:11:22.240 Like when you first hear it, you're like, come on.

00:11:24.600 Right?

00:11:25.240 Like your first reaction is, come on.

00:11:27.920 Why would that even happen?

00:11:30.000 Like, who would be doing that?

00:11:31.760 And then you think about it for like a second in the context of everything we've learned in the last two years.

00:11:37.800 And you say to yourself, oh, actually that's the only way it does work.

00:11:43.700 It wouldn't be the exception.

00:11:45.680 It's the only way anything happens.

00:11:49.220 The media assigns your opinion and then you think you came up with it on your own.

00:11:53.740 That's the way everything happens.

00:11:54.840 This wouldn't be the one time.

00:11:58.120 It's everything.

00:11:59.640 There's no exception to that.

00:12:01.560 So yes, yes, your opinions were assigned to you by the media.

00:12:05.540 Now, not necessarily the FBI, but here's the next question.

00:12:11.500 Do you think the FBI, on their own, organically came up with the idea, let's tell everybody to feel bad about China?

00:12:20.960 Were they the originators of the thought that eventually got assigned to the public?

00:12:26.120 Nope.

00:12:30.680 Where did they get it from?

00:12:34.040 Where did the media get it from?

00:12:36.280 Right.

00:12:36.380 So presumably the FBI is as influenced by the media as everybody else, right?

00:12:41.860 Probably everything the FBI knows about China, like 99% of what they know about China, is exactly what you know.

00:12:49.840 Do you think the FBI has any special information that would inform their decisions?

00:12:55.240 Well, yes, they would have special information about bad behavior of China.

00:13:01.060 But I think we know that too, right?

00:13:03.440 Is there anybody who doesn't know China's shipping fentanyl to the cartels? 0.52

00:13:07.820 Like, I doubt there's anything that's really, really bad that the public doesn't already believe is true as well.

00:13:14.120 So the question is then, if the FBI is convincing us, who convinced the FBI?

00:13:22.340 That was the media, because that's who convinced everybody.

00:13:25.900 But who convinced the media?

00:13:27.800 Who convinced the media that China was the enemy?

00:13:34.380 Seriously, who did it?

00:13:36.740 The CIA?

00:13:37.820 But who would have convinced them?

00:13:40.420 Like, where did it start with?

00:13:44.440 You could say Trump a little bit.

00:13:46.420 But Trump was saying that China was an adversary.

00:13:50.600 Like, you know, just an economic adversary, basically.

00:13:57.940 It's funny, nobody said me.

00:14:01.000 Nobody said me.

00:14:05.440 Now, here's the fun part.

00:14:08.480 If I did it, I could admit it to you.

00:14:11.740 I could tell you.

00:14:13.060 If I did it, I could just say, I did that.

00:14:15.600 And you wouldn't believe it.

00:14:17.740 If I really did it.

00:14:20.080 Would you agree with that?

00:14:21.840 I'm not saying I did it.

00:14:23.100 I'm saying, if I did that myself, you wouldn't know.

00:14:27.260 And if I told you I did, you'd say, no, you didn't.

00:14:30.240 Or some of you would believe it, because you're biased that way.

00:14:32.500 Some would not believe it, because you're biased the other way.

00:14:35.040 But basically, you would just follow your bias.

00:14:36.980 I could actually change the entire global political structure of the world

00:14:43.520 and tell you I did it, show you how I did it, and you still couldn't see it.

00:14:49.000 That's a true statement.

00:14:52.720 I could change the whole fucking world right in front of you, show you I did it,

00:14:57.560 you still wouldn't see it.

00:14:59.240 It'd be invisible.

00:15:01.060 Now, one of the coolest things about being a hypnotist is knowing how to hide things in plain sight.

00:15:07.240 I do it all the time, and you don't know it, because you can't see it.

00:15:12.400 It's basically the combination of two skills.

00:15:16.040 One is persuasion, and the other is magic tricks.

00:15:20.320 Magic tricks are about getting you to look in the wrong place, or to think in the wrong place.

00:15:25.320 Magic tricks are more about how you think than what you're looking at.

00:15:29.380 So, when I combine the two, I can simply make you look in the wrong place

00:15:34.680 while I'm showing you the right thing.

00:15:36.420 I can hold it right up to you, and you'd be looking over here.

00:15:40.720 You would never even be able to see it.

00:15:42.640 Now, it's the damnedest thing, and there's no way I could explain it to you

00:15:47.240 in a way you'd actually believe that what I'm telling you is true.

00:15:49.720 I could hide anything right in front of you.

00:15:52.920 You'd never see it.

00:15:56.160 So, what is the truth?

00:15:58.100 Am I the reason that opinions about China are so bad at the moment?

00:16:03.920 Well, it does track exactly with the death of my stepson.

00:16:10.080 If you were to look at the news reports, you'd see a very direct correlation.

00:16:15.900 But, there are many variables going on, right?

00:16:20.480 I have a request to hide the dot on my nose, because it's too distracting.

00:16:24.060 I think you're right.

00:16:28.860 So, like I was saying, let's continue with the rest of the show.

00:16:36.680 Let's see if I can do, like, one of the...

00:16:38.300 You know how on TV, when they have a pregnant actress in a sitcom, 1.00

00:16:44.180 they have to shoot around the stomach? 0.99

00:16:46.840 And you see it immediately, because you know that she's pregnant.

00:16:49.380 It's like all the views are up here.

00:16:51.720 I'm going to try to do that.

00:16:53.660 So, for the rest of the show,

00:16:55.200 I'm going to accidentally be covering it

00:16:58.220 without you being aware

00:16:59.740 that every time I do this,

00:17:03.080 you'll never see it.

00:17:04.980 And so, let's look at the whiteboard.

00:17:08.540 And let's come back.

00:17:10.980 Do you think I can pull this off for another 45 minutes?

00:17:14.600 No, it would be too annoying.

00:17:16.060 Don't look at my dot on my nose.

00:17:17.860 Don't look at the dot on my nose.

00:17:19.920 Whatever you do, do not focus on the dot on my nose.

00:17:23.300 Get it out of your mind.

00:17:24.500 No thinking about the dot on my nose.

00:17:27.600 I think that worked.

00:17:30.320 No, it just made it worse.

00:17:32.320 Moly, moly, moly.

00:17:33.640 I know what you're thinking.

00:17:35.040 Say it.

00:17:36.160 Say it.

00:17:37.240 Moly, moly, moly.

00:17:38.420 Go ahead.

00:17:39.980 I know what you're thinking.

00:17:40.840 Movie reference.

00:17:43.920 All right.

00:17:44.820 And now,

00:17:46.340 to bake your brain like it's never been baked before.

00:17:51.460 But first,

00:17:55.060 have I told you about the so,

00:17:58.120 tell for cognitive dissonance?

00:18:00.860 Have I taught you

00:18:01.720 that when somebody starts their tweet response in debate,

00:18:06.320 so,

00:18:07.440 you're saying

00:18:08.520 that that is always a sign of cognitive dissonance?

00:18:12.520 And that there are two things to look for.

00:18:15.100 First is the word so

00:18:16.280 at the beginning of the sentence.

00:18:18.480 But that's not 100% reliable.

00:18:21.820 It's very close.

00:18:23.280 It's probably 90% reliable.

00:18:25.080 But it's not 100%.

00:18:26.300 Because every once in a while,

00:18:28.300 somebody might use the word so,

00:18:30.060 and it's just a way of talking.

00:18:31.740 Right?

00:18:31.980 Because it's a word.

00:18:33.160 You could use words.

00:18:34.120 But 90% of the time,

00:18:36.860 in the context of a debate,

00:18:38.560 it's a signal that the next thing I'm going to say

00:18:40.660 is nonsense.

00:18:42.960 Now,

00:18:43.460 what is the form of the nonsense?

00:18:45.440 Because this would be the second confirmation.

00:18:48.540 So,

00:18:48.840 if they say something that's nonsense,

00:18:50.500 what kind of nonsense?

00:18:52.480 A special kind.

00:18:54.800 Right.

00:18:55.820 Absurd absolutes.

00:18:57.180 That's one.

00:18:58.820 Where they say,

00:18:59.780 oh,

00:19:00.440 you're saying that 100% of people

00:19:02.980 die from a vaccination,

00:19:04.400 for example.

00:19:05.500 Right?

00:19:05.660 That would be an absurd absolute.

00:19:08.120 The other is word salad.

00:19:10.240 Where you look at the sentence

00:19:11.500 and you say,

00:19:12.440 that doesn't even look like a person

00:19:14.100 who knows how words go together.

00:19:16.300 Right?

00:19:17.260 And then the other is,

00:19:18.480 as was mentioned,

00:19:19.240 your mind reading.

00:19:20.440 Where somebody says,

00:19:21.520 oh,

00:19:22.140 so you're thinking that gravity

00:19:23.740 is really made of chocolate.

00:19:25.460 And you think,

00:19:27.600 literally no one thinks

00:19:29.160 gravity is made of chocolate.

00:19:31.140 Literally no one.

00:19:32.900 And yet,

00:19:33.340 you've read my mind

00:19:34.400 to think that's in there?

00:19:35.940 Right?

00:19:36.140 That's just a clear,

00:19:37.580 clear science.

00:19:39.320 All right.

00:19:39.900 So,

00:19:40.360 when I see a real example

00:19:42.120 of this in the wild,

00:19:43.600 I like to point it out

00:19:44.720 to my audience,

00:19:45.800 because this is one of the things

00:19:47.340 that makes you smarter

00:19:48.120 than other people.

00:19:49.940 Once you can,

00:19:50.860 once you can recognize

00:19:52.080 cognitive dissonance,

00:19:53.600 pull back.

00:19:55.980 You can't talk somebody

00:19:57.220 out of an illusion.

00:19:58.660 If somebody's hallucinating,

00:20:00.360 you can't say,

00:20:01.140 no,

00:20:01.400 you don't see that elephant

00:20:02.400 right in front of you.

00:20:03.760 That doesn't work.

00:20:05.780 It'll never work.

00:20:07.200 So,

00:20:07.640 you have to know,

00:20:08.320 you know,

00:20:08.820 when to make your shot

00:20:09.940 and when to just pull back

00:20:11.540 and say,

00:20:11.920 okay,

00:20:12.280 we're done here.

00:20:13.260 Now,

00:20:13.500 by the way,

00:20:14.400 when you see the so tell,

00:20:16.640 the word so followed

00:20:17.720 by the nonsense,

00:20:19.000 that's when you should

00:20:20.060 declare victory.

00:20:20.800 That is,

00:20:22.220 you unambiguously

00:20:23.520 made a point

00:20:24.900 that just destroyed

00:20:26.000 the other person's mind

00:20:27.240 in real time.

00:20:29.360 Like somebody's mind

00:20:30.180 just fell apart

00:20:30.860 in real time.

00:20:31.660 And it happens so commonly

00:20:32.840 that you don't notice it,

00:20:35.000 right?

00:20:35.380 But I can give you

00:20:36.040 one really specific example

00:20:37.920 that happened this morning.

00:20:41.140 And I'm going to beg you

00:20:43.040 to ignore the content

00:20:44.820 of the disagreement.

00:20:45.900 Because if you start agreeing

00:20:48.560 with either of the two people,

00:20:50.140 you'll miss the point.

00:20:52.000 So,

00:20:52.240 it's not about which one

00:20:52.980 is right,

00:20:53.800 okay?

00:20:54.640 Because you could be wrong

00:20:55.900 and still trigger somebody

00:20:57.620 into cognitive dissonance.

00:20:59.540 Right?

00:20:59.880 So,

00:21:00.360 all that has to happen

00:21:01.480 is somebody

00:21:01.960 sees something

00:21:03.220 in the real world

00:21:03.980 that is contrary

00:21:05.760 to what they believe

00:21:06.840 is true 0.89

00:21:07.260 and their whole

00:21:07.880 self-image

00:21:08.880 of who they are

00:21:09.560 and then it happens

00:21:10.680 automatically.

00:21:12.080 So,

00:21:12.400 here's the setup.

00:21:13.240 Somebody named Scott

00:21:16.020 who isn't me

00:21:16.720 said in a tweet

00:21:19.380 about COVID

00:21:21.200 it says

00:21:21.900 the evidence

00:21:22.680 that it reduces

00:21:23.420 the severity

00:21:24.140 of an infection

00:21:24.900 in the most vulnerable

00:21:26.600 appears to be clear.

00:21:28.900 Don't disagree

00:21:29.620 or agree.

00:21:30.440 All right?

00:21:31.140 Don't agree,

00:21:31.920 don't disagree.

00:21:32.520 We're not talking

00:21:33.080 about whether he's

00:21:33.640 right or wrong.

00:21:35.240 He's just saying

00:21:35.860 that the evidence

00:21:36.580 would show

00:21:37.860 that the jabs

00:21:38.800 seem to help

00:21:40.000 people survive.

00:21:41.300 Don't agree

00:21:42.040 or disagree.

00:21:43.240 Now,

00:21:43.920 Todd

00:21:44.300 replies to that

00:21:48.440 with this.

00:21:49.620 So,

00:21:50.400 the new pro-vax

00:21:51.440 argument is,

00:21:52.220 quote,

00:21:52.800 I know my shot

00:21:53.760 endangers you

00:21:54.580 but it makes

00:21:55.420 things safer

00:21:56.080 for me

00:21:56.580 and that's all

00:21:57.500 that matters,

00:21:58.160 unquote.

00:21:58.860 What a selfish

00:21:59.580 position.

00:22:01.260 Do you see it?

00:22:02.540 He starts with so

00:22:03.500 and then he puts

00:22:05.200 in quote

00:22:05.660 something that

00:22:06.300 very much

00:22:06.760 did not happen.

00:22:08.500 This person

00:22:09.020 did not say

00:22:09.840 anything about

00:22:11.320 the shot

00:22:12.140 endangering anybody

00:22:13.180 which is not

00:22:14.060 in evidence

00:22:14.580 at all

00:22:15.060 but it makes

00:22:16.120 things safer

00:22:16.700 for him

00:22:17.240 which is not

00:22:17.920 in evidence

00:22:18.540 that's mind

00:22:19.460 reading

00:22:19.760 and that's

00:22:20.740 all that matters

00:22:21.420 is not in evidence

00:22:22.400 it's mind reading

00:22:23.260 and it's an absolute.

00:22:25.020 So,

00:22:25.340 he's got an absurd

00:22:26.140 absolute

00:22:26.620 that's all that

00:22:27.620 matters.

00:22:28.940 Do you think

00:22:29.540 that poor Scott

00:22:30.400 not me

00:22:31.140 do you think

00:22:32.200 that whatever

00:22:33.600 his actual

00:22:34.300 argument is

00:22:35.060 do you think

00:22:35.920 that his argument

00:22:36.560 is that that's

00:22:37.460 all that matters?

00:22:38.080 that's nobody's

00:22:40.140 argument

00:22:40.460 like literally

00:22:41.520 nobody would have

00:22:42.200 that argument

00:22:42.600 oh that's all

00:22:43.360 that matters

00:22:43.860 in this big

00:22:44.940 complicated situation.

00:22:47.940 So,

00:22:48.940 do you get

00:22:50.040 do you get

00:22:50.820 the lesson

00:22:51.280 when you see

00:22:52.400 the so

00:22:52.920 look for the

00:22:54.240 absurd absolute

00:22:55.320 the mind reading

00:22:56.920 or the word salad

00:22:58.720 sometimes all of them

00:23:00.020 and it is so clear

00:23:02.040 it's just so clear.

00:23:03.320 Now,

00:23:05.540 have you ever

00:23:06.460 wondered why

00:23:07.240 we can't agree

00:23:08.840 on the most

00:23:09.380 basic things

00:23:10.240 like

00:23:11.220 climate change

00:23:13.040 or vaccinations?

00:23:14.560 I actually

00:23:15.420 finally figured out

00:23:16.340 why

00:23:16.680 and it's going

00:23:18.320 to blow your mind

00:23:19.020 because it's actually

00:23:19.660 kind of obvious

00:23:20.320 but you're not

00:23:21.440 going to like it

00:23:22.020 at first.

00:23:23.320 So,

00:23:23.540 some of you

00:23:24.020 are going to get

00:23:24.500 triggered

00:23:24.880 into cognitive

00:23:25.980 dissonance.

00:23:27.380 I'm not doing it

00:23:28.360 intentionally in this

00:23:29.200 case.

00:23:30.000 Sometimes I do it

00:23:30.700 intentionally.

00:23:31.740 I'm not doing it

00:23:32.440 intentionally.

00:23:33.320 So,

00:23:34.280 whatever it is

00:23:35.280 you need to tell

00:23:35.840 your brain

00:23:36.460 to prime yourself

00:23:38.160 there's a very

00:23:39.380 high chance

00:23:40.060 you're going to

00:23:40.400 get triggered

00:23:40.900 in the next moment.

00:23:42.580 Alright?

00:23:44.040 Number one,

00:23:44.940 I'm going to lead

00:23:45.460 you into it slowly

00:23:46.380 so you can sort of

00:23:47.320 get acclimated

00:23:48.120 before you get

00:23:48.640 the hard stuff.

00:23:49.820 Number one,

00:23:51.460 if a climate

00:23:52.660 scientist says

00:23:53.500 here's my

00:23:54.120 projection

00:23:54.900 of what's going

00:23:56.020 to happen

00:23:56.300 into the future

00:23:57.000 I say

00:23:58.280 that's not credible

00:23:59.380 and my critics say

00:24:01.080 why are you

00:24:01.820 doubting science?

00:24:03.320 who's right?

00:24:05.180 I say

00:24:05.900 your prediction

00:24:06.820 of the future

00:24:07.340 is not credible

00:24:08.180 might be right

00:24:09.260 I don't know

00:24:10.360 if it's right

00:24:10.780 or wrong

00:24:11.080 but it's not credible

00:24:11.840 and then

00:24:14.900 my critics say

00:24:15.740 you're

00:24:16.280 being anti-science

00:24:18.220 because all the

00:24:18.940 scientists are

00:24:19.540 on the same page

00:24:20.240 or most of them

00:24:20.980 most of them

00:24:21.420 are on the same page

00:24:21.920 and what is my

00:24:23.700 defense to that

00:24:24.500 do you know?

00:24:25.340 what's my defense?

00:24:27.600 has anybody ever

00:24:28.480 seen me defend

00:24:29.680 that situation?

00:24:33.220 here's my defense

00:24:34.280 if a scientist

00:24:37.440 is telling me science

00:24:38.720 I might defer

00:24:40.120 to the expert

00:24:40.940 who knows more

00:24:42.260 than I do

00:24:42.720 because

00:24:43.560 does a scientist

00:24:45.080 know more

00:24:45.860 about climate change

00:24:47.600 especially if it's

00:24:48.460 their field

00:24:49.040 than I do

00:24:50.140 we all agree

00:24:51.620 yes

00:24:51.940 right?

00:24:52.780 the scientist

00:24:53.500 in climate change

00:24:54.700 knows more

00:24:55.660 than Scott does

00:24:56.500 and so if I were

00:24:57.780 to question

00:24:58.320 the climate scientist

00:24:59.800 that would be

00:25:02.700 sort of a weak

00:25:03.480 position

00:25:03.960 on my side

00:25:05.260 unless I had

00:25:06.000 unless I had

00:25:07.080 some other expert

00:25:07.940 agreed with me

00:25:08.640 I suppose

00:25:09.020 so that's what

00:25:11.840 people see

00:25:12.440 they see this expert

00:25:13.720 and then they see

00:25:14.980 a cartoonist

00:25:15.880 they're like

00:25:16.540 ah

00:25:17.040 who am I going to

00:25:18.240 believe

00:25:18.540 the cartoonist

00:25:19.400 or the expert

00:25:19.940 what's wrong

00:25:21.060 with their analysis?

00:25:22.160 I'll tell you

00:25:22.920 who's the expert

00:25:24.700 on data analysis

00:25:25.660 the scientist

00:25:26.980 or me?

00:25:29.420 well I did it

00:25:30.340 for a living

00:25:30.780 I did data analysis

00:25:32.360 for a living

00:25:32.920 so when I see

00:25:34.440 a scientist

00:25:35.300 show me a data

00:25:37.040 analysis

00:25:37.440 or projection

00:25:38.060 specifically a projection

00:25:39.400 he's talking

00:25:40.620 he's in my domain

00:25:41.380 he's not in his

00:25:42.040 own domain

00:25:42.500 so if I call

00:25:44.060 bullshit

00:25:44.420 on my domain

00:25:46.380 then you should

00:25:48.200 agree with me

00:25:48.760 if you like

00:25:49.220 experts

00:25:49.740 right?

00:25:52.060 I'll bet

00:25:52.440 there's not

00:25:53.180 anybody showing

00:25:54.040 a projection

00:25:55.520 who has done

00:25:56.100 as much work

00:25:56.900 as I have

00:25:57.480 as many hours

00:25:58.300 as I have

00:25:58.760 creating my own

00:26:00.000 projections

00:26:00.440 so I know

00:26:00.920 exactly what

00:26:01.520 the pitfalls

00:26:01.980 are

00:26:02.300 I know

00:26:03.100 who lies

00:26:03.680 why

00:26:04.060 I know

00:26:04.840 the whole

00:26:05.080 dynamic

00:26:05.580 of how

00:26:06.300 these things

00:26:06.780 get biased

00:26:07.380 by everything

00:26:08.560 else

00:26:08.880 alright

00:26:09.920 so that's

00:26:10.260 your first

00:26:10.600 example

00:26:11.000 so this is

00:26:11.680 not a conversation

00:26:12.400 about climate

00:26:12.880 change

00:26:13.280 it's about

00:26:14.440 the expert

00:26:15.360 communicates

00:26:16.820 using a

00:26:17.720 mode

00:26:18.140 data

00:26:19.040 that's not

00:26:20.040 their expertise

00:26:20.760 so you're

00:26:22.120 fooled into

00:26:22.680 thinking you're

00:26:23.200 hearing from

00:26:23.660 an expert

00:26:24.140 but you're

00:26:25.180 not

00:26:25.600 you're hearing

00:26:26.800 an expert

00:26:27.420 outside of

00:26:28.120 his expertise

00:26:28.740 using data

00:26:29.840 whose data

00:26:30.780 is not

00:26:31.100 what

00:26:31.300 that's not

00:26:31.760 science per se

00:26:32.520 now I'm

00:26:33.560 not saying

00:26:33.880 all scientists

00:26:34.720 can't do

00:26:35.960 data analysis

00:26:36.660 I wouldn't say

00:26:37.580 that

00:26:37.940 I'm sure

00:26:38.920 there are

00:26:39.160 plenty

00:26:39.340 who can

00:26:39.700 but you

00:26:40.520 don't know

00:26:41.000 and most

00:26:42.140 of them

00:26:42.400 are not

00:26:42.680 experts

00:26:43.180 now how

00:26:44.080 about doctors

00:26:44.760 are you

00:26:46.360 aware of

00:26:46.760 the course

00:26:47.460 that all

00:26:47.880 doctors

00:26:48.280 are required

00:26:48.860 to take

00:26:49.460 to teach

00:26:50.520 them how

00:26:50.860 to look

00:26:51.140 at data

00:26:51.860 studies

00:26:52.300 have you

00:26:52.900 heard of

00:26:53.100 that course

00:26:53.580 it's called

00:26:54.980 something that

00:26:55.540 doesn't exist

00:26:56.320 it doesn't

00:26:58.020 exist

00:26:58.520 ask them

00:26:59.800 they don't

00:27:00.500 learn how

00:27:00.840 to do

00:27:01.060 data analysis

00:27:01.700 so then

00:27:03.080 COVID happens

00:27:04.000 and what

00:27:05.460 happened when

00:27:06.120 COVID happens

00:27:06.900 there were a

00:27:07.540 whole bunch

00:27:07.880 of doctors

00:27:08.500 and virologists

00:27:10.780 and experts

00:27:11.320 who told

00:27:14.100 us about

00:27:14.500 the data

00:27:14.980 and then

00:27:16.800 we said

00:27:17.360 oh we

00:27:17.960 better believe

00:27:18.700 the doctors

00:27:19.980 but you know

00:27:21.620 what you

00:27:21.980 didn't really

00:27:22.380 hear from

00:27:22.700 the doctors

00:27:23.200 did you

00:27:23.600 the doctors

00:27:25.160 left their

00:27:25.720 field of

00:27:26.160 expertise

00:27:26.680 entered the

00:27:28.180 field of

00:27:28.620 data where

00:27:29.120 they're not

00:27:29.520 experts

00:27:30.000 and then

00:27:31.280 they told

00:27:31.680 you something

00:27:32.220 should you

00:27:33.320 believe the

00:27:33.700 experts

00:27:34.120 well we

00:27:36.380 haven't heard

00:27:36.920 from them

00:27:37.320 you haven't

00:27:38.420 heard from

00:27:38.700 the experts

00:27:39.200 if you

00:27:39.980 heard from

00:27:40.240 a doctor

00:27:40.740 that's the

00:27:41.980 wrong person

00:27:42.600 because it's

00:27:44.540 data

00:27:44.860 data analysis

00:27:45.820 is a whole

00:27:46.380 different field

00:27:46.980 so if a

00:27:48.160 doctor is

00:27:48.720 giving you

00:27:49.080 data analysis

00:27:49.800 are you

00:27:51.100 hearing from

00:27:51.820 an expert

00:27:52.240 no

00:27:53.060 no it's

00:27:53.860 just like

00:27:54.180 climate change

00:27:54.860 right

00:27:56.240 the data

00:27:57.380 expert is a

00:27:57.920 whole different

00:27:58.300 field

00:27:58.620 so if

00:27:59.480 I disagree

00:28:00.060 with some

00:28:00.480 of these

00:28:00.720 data

00:28:01.100 and they're

00:28:02.120 like a

00:28:02.440 big

00:28:02.640 virologist

00:28:03.800 who do

00:28:04.580 you trust

00:28:05.040 the person

00:28:06.140 who can

00:28:06.660 spot

00:28:07.380 bullshit

00:28:07.760 data

00:28:08.220 and has

00:28:09.400 done it

00:28:09.740 for decades

00:28:10.800 at a

00:28:12.420 commercial

00:28:12.760 level

00:28:13.220 people paid

00:28:14.680 me to do

00:28:15.120 it

00:28:15.320 it was

00:28:16.000 actually my

00:28:16.560 job

00:28:17.000 to know

00:28:17.840 what was a

00:28:18.340 good analysis

00:28:19.000 and a bad

00:28:19.480 analysis

00:28:19.880 alright

00:28:20.300 here comes

00:28:22.100 the payoff

00:28:22.540 you ready

00:28:23.040 here's how

00:28:32.640 I get in

00:28:33.080 trouble

00:28:33.360 I'm going

00:28:35.220 to label

00:28:35.520 this the

00:28:35.980 Alex Berenson

00:28:36.780 problem

00:28:37.380 which will

00:28:39.420 take about

00:28:40.000 10 seconds

00:28:40.880 before Alex

00:28:41.780 Berenson gets

00:28:42.560 a bunch of

00:28:43.940 messages

00:28:44.720 saying

00:28:45.660 he's talking

00:28:46.560 about you

00:28:47.120 you better

00:28:48.720 go over there

00:28:49.220 and clear that

00:28:49.840 up because

00:28:50.260 he's going

00:28:50.560 to cause

00:28:50.920 some trouble

00:28:51.320 for you

00:28:51.720 so

00:28:52.780 let me

00:28:54.180 start by

00:28:54.720 a compliment

00:28:55.620 to Alex

00:28:56.240 Berenson

00:28:56.620 so

00:28:58.640 let me

00:28:59.440 start

00:28:59.660 while I

00:29:01.460 often disagree

00:29:02.340 with the

00:29:03.580 people who

00:29:04.000 are the

00:29:04.280 rogue

00:29:04.880 the rogue

00:29:06.760 voices

00:29:07.220 you know

00:29:07.600 the ones

00:29:07.920 who are

00:29:08.260 outside the

00:29:08.860 mainstream

00:29:09.180 well I

00:29:10.140 often say

00:29:10.680 that they're

00:29:11.080 wrong

00:29:11.440 because I

00:29:12.780 think overall

00:29:13.320 they're usually

00:29:13.800 wrong

00:29:14.160 on topics

00:29:15.820 in general

00:29:16.380 right

00:29:16.940 the ones

00:29:17.600 who are

00:29:17.760 outside the

00:29:18.240 mainstream

00:29:18.580 are usually

00:29:19.080 wrong

00:29:19.440 but every

00:29:20.280 now and

00:29:20.600 then they're

00:29:20.960 the only

00:29:21.220 ones

00:29:21.440 who are

00:29:21.620 right

00:29:21.920 would you

00:29:23.160 agree

00:29:23.420 every now

00:29:24.760 and then

00:29:25.200 they're the

00:29:26.320 only ones

00:29:26.840 who are

00:29:27.060 right

00:29:27.360 so

00:29:28.820 let me

00:29:30.060 give a

00:29:30.600 big thumbs

00:29:31.660 up

00:29:32.020 and even

00:29:33.140 an applause

00:29:33.780 for the

00:29:34.360 Alex

00:29:34.620 Berenson's

00:29:35.260 we need

00:29:37.140 more Alex

00:29:37.680 Berenson's

00:29:38.240 would you

00:29:38.480 agree

00:29:38.740 everybody

00:29:39.560 so as

00:29:41.020 a patriot

00:29:41.960 A plus

00:29:43.240 can we

00:29:44.720 all be

00:29:45.040 on the

00:29:45.280 same

00:29:45.560 page

00:29:47.820 it

00:29:48.700 it looked

00:29:48.960 like he

00:29:49.300 was trying

00:29:49.640 to help

00:29:50.120 it looked

00:29:51.840 like he

00:29:52.200 spotted a

00:29:52.780 problem

00:29:53.140 that he

00:29:53.500 thought was

00:29:53.960 very important

00:29:55.280 to spread

00:29:56.380 looks like he

00:29:57.840 took some

00:29:58.200 personal risk

00:29:59.000 a lot of

00:29:59.420 it actually

00:29:59.880 to do it

00:30:00.980 now

00:30:01.880 if you're

00:30:04.020 new to me

00:30:04.500 does that

00:30:04.920 mean I

00:30:05.260 agree with

00:30:05.960 the Alex

00:30:06.460 Berenson

00:30:06.880 point of

00:30:07.640 view

00:30:07.820 right

00:30:08.800 those of

00:30:09.260 you know

00:30:09.540 me know

00:30:09.840 that's not

00:30:10.240 what's

00:30:10.460 happening

00:30:10.740 I'm saying

00:30:11.960 that

00:30:12.380 I told

00:30:14.700 you I

00:30:15.000 think

00:30:15.160 yesterday

00:30:15.540 I'm going

00:30:16.280 to spend

00:30:16.640 between now

00:30:17.400 and the

00:30:17.640 end of

00:30:17.920 this year

00:30:18.420 giving

00:30:19.660 people

00:30:20.140 as much

00:30:21.300 appreciation

00:30:21.980 as I

00:30:22.460 can

00:30:22.700 I feel

00:30:23.880 it's just

00:30:24.140 a good

00:30:24.420 exercise

00:30:24.980 at the

00:30:25.340 end of

00:30:25.560 the year

00:30:25.780 right

00:30:26.040 so I'm

00:30:26.800 going to

00:30:27.000 appreciate

00:30:27.740 Alex

00:30:28.900 Berenson

00:30:29.260 and we're

00:30:29.980 going to

00:30:30.200 talk about

00:30:30.620 Dr.

00:30:31.800 Malone

00:30:32.160 next

00:30:32.760 I

00:30:33.880 appreciate

00:30:34.440 Dr.

00:30:35.800 Malone

00:30:36.160 heroes

00:30:38.080 patriots

00:30:39.260 but I

00:30:40.040 don't know

00:30:40.260 if they're

00:30:40.500 right

00:30:40.860 you need

00:30:42.300 to hear

00:30:42.500 that part

00:30:42.880 really

00:30:43.140 clearly

00:30:43.540 I don't

00:30:44.420 know

00:30:44.540 if they're

00:30:44.780 right

00:30:45.160 how would

00:30:47.380 I know

00:30:47.720 I mean

00:30:48.240 it's

00:30:49.080 impossible

00:30:49.460 to know

00:30:49.900 but I

00:30:51.020 appreciate

00:30:51.440 the hell

00:30:51.820 out of

00:30:52.100 okay

00:30:52.640 so we

00:30:53.240 can start

00:30:53.600 with that

00:30:53.900 right

00:30:54.140 and then

00:30:55.160 you'll

00:30:55.560 know

00:30:55.680 I'm not

00:30:56.100 I'm not

00:30:56.800 just being

00:30:57.140 a dick 0.75

00:30:57.520 okay

00:30:58.060 I'll call

00:31:00.720 it the

00:31:00.900 Alex Berenson

00:31:01.480 problem

00:31:02.120 but I

00:31:03.240 think the

00:31:03.560 problem

00:31:03.860 might be

00:31:04.240 on your

00:31:04.580 end

00:31:04.900 not his

00:31:05.480 end

00:31:05.720 okay

00:31:05.980 so

00:31:07.340 here's

00:31:08.540 the fact

00:31:09.040 so there's

00:31:09.840 some data

00:31:10.300 and we

00:31:11.020 don't trust

00:31:11.520 any data

00:31:12.080 but there

00:31:13.020 is data

00:31:13.480 that says

00:31:14.580 that there

00:31:15.340 are more

00:31:15.660 vaxxed people 0.55

00:31:16.640 getting infected

00:31:17.400 than non-vaxxed

00:31:18.460 how do you

00:31:19.340 interpret that

00:31:19.940 well

00:31:21.020 the way that

00:31:22.840 Alex Berenson

00:31:23.820 is suggesting

00:31:25.120 and I would

00:31:26.280 say

00:31:26.520 I would say

00:31:27.140 it's more

00:31:27.580 the way he

00:31:28.760 words it

00:31:29.360 I don't think

00:31:29.940 he said it

00:31:30.400 directly

00:31:30.740 but you

00:31:32.180 could maybe

00:31:32.560 correct me

00:31:33.180 but he's

00:31:34.120 suggesting

00:31:34.520 that there's

00:31:35.100 something about

00:31:35.540 getting the

00:31:36.000 vax

00:31:36.380 that makes

00:31:37.280 you more

00:31:37.620 vulnerable

00:31:38.060 to COVID

00:31:38.640 because

00:31:39.660 the data

00:31:40.760 says that

00:31:41.340 there are

00:31:41.580 more

00:31:41.760 vaxxed people 0.55

00:31:42.500 getting infected

00:31:43.220 these days

00:31:43.840 than non-vaxxed

00:31:45.140 so certainly

00:31:45.940 if you

00:31:46.340 if you

00:31:46.780 hoped

00:31:47.060 that your

00:31:47.480 vaccinations

00:31:48.120 were actual

00:31:49.600 vaccinations

00:31:50.220 this would be

00:31:51.440 a disaster

00:31:52.060 can we all

00:31:53.240 agree on that

00:31:53.920 that would be

00:31:55.300 a disaster

00:31:55.760 but there's

00:31:57.040 another

00:31:57.260 interpretation

00:31:57.860 that the

00:31:59.580 data shows

00:32:00.400 what it

00:32:00.860 shows

00:32:01.260 because

00:32:01.860 vulnerable

00:32:02.260 people

00:32:02.540 are more

00:32:03.260 likely to get

00:32:03.860 a vax

00:32:04.340 wouldn't you

00:32:07.300 expect

00:32:07.740 that most

00:32:08.600 the people

00:32:09.420 who got

00:32:09.920 vaxed

00:32:10.480 are also

00:32:12.040 the ones

00:32:12.580 who

00:32:12.900 were most

00:32:14.180 vulnerable

00:32:14.520 no

00:32:19.100 no

00:32:20.420 let's

00:32:22.400 let's break

00:32:22.900 it down

00:32:23.260 in general

00:32:24.420 are the people

00:32:25.240 most vulnerable

00:32:25.940 most likely

00:32:26.580 to get

00:32:27.080 a vaccination

00:32:27.720 yes or no

00:32:28.480 are the people

00:32:30.280 most vulnerable

00:32:31.220 most likely

00:32:32.280 to get vaccinated

00:32:32.920 right

00:32:33.720 so you would

00:32:34.820 expect

00:32:35.200 that there

00:32:35.800 would be

00:32:36.040 the most

00:32:36.460 deaths

00:32:37.080 in the people

00:32:38.260 who had

00:32:38.480 the most

00:32:38.800 vaccinations

00:32:39.440 would you

00:32:39.920 because even

00:32:41.940 if it works

00:32:42.760 a little bit

00:32:43.800 even if

00:32:44.480 remember that's

00:32:45.160 just if

00:32:45.560 even if it

00:32:46.500 works a little

00:32:47.000 bit

00:32:47.280 the people

00:32:48.380 most likely

00:32:49.060 to die

00:32:49.500 get most

00:32:49.940 of the

00:32:50.120 vaccinations

00:32:50.640 and it

00:32:51.620 does

00:32:51.940 whatever

00:32:52.340 it does

00:32:52.920 but still

00:32:53.500 that group

00:32:53.960 would be

00:32:54.220 the most

00:32:54.520 likely

00:32:54.820 to die

00:32:55.260 so if

00:32:56.400 you saw

00:32:56.740 that the

00:32:57.040 people

00:32:57.220 most likely

00:32:57.840 to die

00:32:58.500 were the

00:32:59.720 ones who

00:33:00.080 are also

00:33:00.580 most likely

00:33:01.340 to be

00:33:01.620 vaccinated

00:33:02.080 would you

00:33:02.920 conclude

00:33:03.300 that the

00:33:03.640 vaccination

00:33:03.980 was killing

00:33:04.600 them

00:33:04.820 would that

00:33:06.220 be how

00:33:06.500 you

00:33:06.680 analyze

00:33:07.080 that

00:33:07.360 would you

00:33:08.380 assume

00:33:08.700 that the

00:33:09.040 correlation

00:33:09.420 is high

00:33:10.020 so one

00:33:11.060 is causing

00:33:11.620 the other

00:33:12.020 some say

00:33:12.700 yes

00:33:13.040 some say

00:33:13.920 yes

00:33:14.160 yeah

00:33:14.660 so that

00:33:15.200 would be

00:33:15.460 an analysis

00:33:16.560 mistake

00:33:17.340 because that

00:33:18.980 would be

00:33:19.240 confusing

00:33:19.720 correlation

00:33:20.560 two things

00:33:21.800 that move 0.94

00:33:22.280 together

00:33:22.720 with one

00:33:23.760 causing

00:33:24.220 the other

00:33:24.620 right

00:33:25.440 now

00:33:26.460 would you

00:33:28.160 expect

00:33:28.540 a

00:33:29.000 journalist

00:33:30.800 even a

00:33:32.060 very good

00:33:32.420 one

00:33:32.600 very educated

00:33:33.300 one

00:33:33.540 went to a

00:33:34.040 good college

00:33:34.520 etc

00:33:34.820 wouldn't you

00:33:35.920 would you

00:33:36.420 expect him

00:33:37.060 to know

00:33:37.380 the difference

00:33:38.140 between

00:33:39.680 correlation

00:33:40.380 and causation

00:33:41.260 do you

00:33:42.000 think that

00:33:42.720 a journalist

00:33:43.260 would be

00:33:43.660 good at

00:33:44.000 teasing out

00:33:44.600 that difference

00:33:45.180 it's not

00:33:46.620 really the

00:33:47.000 right expertise

00:33:47.600 is it

00:33:48.140 so

00:33:49.680 so you

00:33:51.900 have to

00:33:52.320 you know

00:33:53.400 put that

00:33:54.260 in your

00:33:55.280 head

00:33:55.400 okay

00:33:55.840 now

00:33:56.240 how about

00:33:56.740 me

00:33:57.020 I've told

00:33:58.420 you I have

00:33:58.760 lots of

00:33:59.320 experience

00:33:59.700 in data

00:34:00.120 analysis

00:34:00.500 and I

00:34:01.280 haven't

00:34:01.540 looked into

00:34:02.020 this at

00:34:02.400 all

00:34:02.720 haven't

00:34:03.760 looked into

00:34:04.160 it at

00:34:04.440 all

00:34:04.720 but the

00:34:06.040 most

00:34:06.240 likely

00:34:07.160 explanation

00:34:07.900 is there

00:34:09.160 something

00:34:09.520 about the

00:34:10.300 vulnerable

00:34:10.940 people

00:34:11.480 that's

00:34:12.040 different

00:34:12.360 that's

00:34:13.520 the most

00:34:13.780 likely

00:34:14.100 explanation

00:34:14.720 it's not

00:34:15.840 the most

00:34:16.160 likely

00:34:16.500 explanation

00:34:17.020 that

00:34:17.220 vaccines

00:34:17.540 just think

00:34:19.280 about

00:34:19.500 what are

00:34:19.980 the odds

00:34:20.500 that science

00:34:22.440 created the

00:34:23.220 only known

00:34:23.960 chemical

00:34:24.420 that would

00:34:25.380 make you

00:34:25.760 more likely

00:34:26.340 to get

00:34:26.860 infected

00:34:27.520 with the

00:34:27.920 COVID

00:34:28.180 what are

00:34:29.800 the odds

00:34:30.060 of that

00:34:30.480 isn't that

00:34:32.500 a little

00:34:32.760 bit

00:34:33.100 I hate

00:34:33.940 to say

00:34:34.260 this

00:34:34.560 but

00:34:34.860 too

00:34:36.080 on the

00:34:36.420 nose

00:34:36.800 see what

00:34:39.020 I did

00:34:39.300 I found

00:34:39.700 another

00:34:39.980 reason to

00:34:40.400 cover that

00:34:40.740 little spot

00:34:41.220 on my

00:34:41.480 nose

00:34:41.800 isn't that

00:34:42.640 too

00:34:42.800 on the

00:34:43.440 nose

00:34:43.760 well

00:34:44.740 if you

00:34:45.120 were the

00:34:45.760 anti-vax

00:34:46.600 guy

00:34:46.940 so if

00:34:48.300 you're the

00:34:48.560 anti-vax

00:34:49.180 guy

00:34:49.360 that's

00:34:49.560 like

00:34:49.720 your

00:34:49.880 brand

00:34:50.360 you're

00:34:51.220 famous

00:34:51.520 for that

00:34:52.020 and suddenly

00:34:53.600 there's

00:34:53.900 data that

00:34:54.380 makes it

00:34:54.700 look like

00:34:55.120 not only

00:34:55.920 did the

00:34:56.240 vaccination

00:34:56.740 maybe not

00:34:57.440 work as

00:34:57.980 well as

00:34:58.380 people hoped

00:34:59.080 but my

00:35:00.000 god

00:35:00.400 it's

00:35:00.780 killing you

00:35:01.300 it's

00:35:01.740 actually

00:35:01.940 making you

00:35:02.400 get more

00:35:02.960 of it

00:35:03.280 isn't this

00:35:04.100 a little

00:35:04.260 too

00:35:04.400 on the

00:35:04.680 nose

00:35:04.960 right

00:35:08.400 now

00:35:10.240 how many

00:35:12.080 of you

00:35:12.340 would agree

00:35:12.780 with me

00:35:13.160 so far

00:35:13.680 that

00:35:14.940 whether

00:35:15.380 Alex

00:35:16.060 Berenson

00:35:16.480 is right

00:35:17.280 or wrong

00:35:17.780 about his

00:35:18.420 larger

00:35:18.860 thesis

00:35:19.440 that the

00:35:20.560 vaccinations

00:35:21.100 have

00:35:22.160 big

00:35:22.940 downsides

00:35:23.480 so whether

00:35:24.280 he's

00:35:24.500 right or

00:35:24.800 wrong

00:35:25.100 would you

00:35:25.920 agree

00:35:26.160 that the

00:35:26.520 analysis

00:35:26.980 is wrong

00:35:27.580 would you

00:35:29.000 agree

00:35:29.200 just that

00:35:29.600 the analysis

00:35:30.140 is wrong

00:35:30.680 on this

00:35:31.380 specific thing

00:35:32.140 and would you

00:35:33.740 agree that

00:35:34.080 the most

00:35:34.400 likely

00:35:34.860 is there's

00:35:35.760 a correlation

00:35:36.260 and there's

00:35:37.580 an obvious

00:35:37.960 reason why

00:35:38.520 there would

00:35:38.780 be a

00:35:39.020 correlation

00:35:39.360 now let's

00:35:40.940 see if this

00:35:41.300 pattern happens

00:35:41.960 again

00:35:42.260 by the way

00:35:43.560 the reason

00:35:44.040 that the

00:35:44.500 scientists

00:35:44.900 get the

00:35:46.160 climate change

00:35:47.240 projections

00:35:47.800 wrong

00:35:48.340 is that they

00:35:49.380 can't figure

00:35:50.580 in technological

00:35:52.680 advances

00:35:53.240 because you

00:35:54.420 can't you

00:35:54.920 can't predict

00:35:55.460 the unpredictable

00:35:56.160 so you don't

00:35:57.320 know if

00:35:57.620 tomorrow

00:35:57.980 there'll be

00:35:58.400 a you know

00:35:59.260 free energy

00:36:00.220 or fusion

00:36:00.940 or what

00:36:02.200 so it's

00:36:03.860 kind of nonsense

00:36:04.500 when you look

00:36:05.020 at the climate

00:36:05.440 models

00:36:05.840 all right

00:36:06.120 let's look

00:36:06.400 at another

00:36:06.680 one

00:36:07.080 again

00:36:08.340 let's call

00:36:08.820 this the

00:36:09.300 Dr. Robert

00:36:10.820 Malone

00:36:11.200 problem

00:36:11.740 again

00:36:12.100 the problem

00:36:12.800 is not

00:36:14.100 Dr. Malone

00:36:14.820 Dr. Malone

00:36:16.420 is a

00:36:16.900 patriot

00:36:17.460 and

00:36:18.960 positive

00:36:20.200 influence

00:36:20.840 on the

00:36:21.100 country

00:36:21.380 don't know

00:36:22.560 if he's

00:36:22.820 right or

00:36:23.140 wrong

00:36:23.380 there does

00:36:25.180 seem to be

00:36:25.620 lots of

00:36:26.260 suggestion

00:36:27.100 that he

00:36:28.260 was right

00:36:28.720 about

00:36:29.060 you know

00:36:29.520 some risks

00:36:30.120 that were

00:36:30.640 not fully

00:36:31.180 expressed

00:36:31.680 that definitely

00:36:32.960 seems to be

00:36:33.500 true

00:36:33.740 but whether

00:36:34.600 he's right

00:36:35.040 about everything

00:36:35.660 is a

00:36:36.080 different

00:36:36.480 question

00:36:36.920 all right

00:36:38.160 so I saw

00:36:38.720 he was

00:36:39.360 on Twitter

00:36:40.880 he showed

00:36:41.280 a graph

00:36:41.700 that showed

00:36:42.760 that there's

00:36:43.120 a huge spike

00:36:43.840 in the

00:36:44.340 excess deaths

00:36:45.300 that correlates

00:36:46.720 with when

00:36:47.360 the vaccinations

00:36:48.400 were available

00:36:49.240 so

00:36:50.980 and the

00:36:51.880 graph

00:36:52.300 can you see

00:36:52.720 this

00:36:52.880 the graph

00:36:53.300 looks like

00:36:53.700 this

00:36:53.980 it's like

00:36:54.780 people die

00:36:56.020 at about

00:36:56.280 the same rate

00:36:57.080 year after year

00:36:58.240 people die

00:36:58.800 at about

00:36:59.040 the same rate

00:36:59.620 uh oh

00:37:00.100 vaccinations

00:37:01.200 were rolled out

00:37:01.920 and death

00:37:02.500 just goes

00:37:02.940 through the roof

00:37:03.500 excess deaths

00:37:05.040 so that

00:37:06.360 would indicate

00:37:07.020 would it

00:37:08.180 not

00:37:08.540 that

00:37:10.020 when you

00:37:11.320 get vaxxed

00:37:12.100 it increases

00:37:12.840 the likelihood

00:37:13.540 you will die

00:37:14.400 compared to

00:37:15.580 getting COVID

00:37:16.060 because that's

00:37:18.100 that's what

00:37:18.640 Dr. Robert

00:37:19.660 Ballone

00:37:20.160 that's what

00:37:22.020 that's the way

00:37:22.580 he presents it

00:37:23.280 now

00:37:23.520 does he say

00:37:24.700 that directly

00:37:25.320 I don't think

00:37:26.700 so

00:37:27.000 I think he

00:37:28.480 I think the way

00:37:29.160 he said it was

00:37:29.800 it's the most

00:37:30.820 important data

00:37:31.960 on the pandemic

00:37:33.060 now if it's

00:37:34.580 the most

00:37:34.900 important data

00:37:35.580 you think

00:37:36.060 that therefore

00:37:36.820 it's telling

00:37:37.600 you something

00:37:38.160 very important

00:37:39.460 because it

00:37:41.180 wouldn't be

00:37:41.500 the most

00:37:41.840 important data

00:37:42.520 unless you

00:37:43.640 could do

00:37:43.960 something about

00:37:44.600 it or it

00:37:45.140 changed how

00:37:45.640 you think

00:37:46.000 now don't

00:37:46.760 you think

00:37:47.100 he's suggesting

00:37:47.740 that it's

00:37:49.480 the vaccinations

00:37:50.180 themselves

00:37:50.860 that are

00:37:51.900 killing people

00:37:52.520 is that

00:37:53.340 is that

00:37:53.820 your interpretation

00:37:54.420 of his view

00:37:55.180 you tell me

00:37:57.500 is that

00:37:58.700 is that

00:37:59.160 his interpretation

00:38:00.020 can you

00:38:03.820 think

00:38:04.160 there's a

00:38:05.360 little

00:38:05.480 disagreement

00:38:05.960 don't know

00:38:07.360 well why

00:38:08.320 else would

00:38:08.740 he

00:38:08.980 why else

00:38:09.900 would he

00:38:10.120 say that's

00:38:10.540 the most

00:38:10.940 important

00:38:11.400 data

00:38:11.780 unless he

00:38:13.020 thought there

00:38:13.360 was a

00:38:13.580 correlation

00:38:14.000 because you

00:38:15.300 know what

00:38:15.520 is not

00:38:16.060 important

00:38:16.480 data

00:38:16.800 by definition

00:38:18.040 a correlation

00:38:19.700 that you

00:38:20.200 don't think

00:38:20.780 is causation

00:38:21.580 would be

00:38:22.640 no importance

00:38:23.300 to anybody

00:38:23.860 right

00:38:24.960 so clearly

00:38:27.060 he doesn't

00:38:27.620 think it's

00:38:28.120 just a

00:38:28.520 correlation

00:38:29.060 because then

00:38:30.320 he would

00:38:30.540 say well

00:38:30.980 we don't

00:38:31.340 know if

00:38:31.620 that means

00:38:31.940 anything

00:38:32.200 he has

00:38:33.380 to think

00:38:33.780 it's a

00:38:34.160 causation

00:38:35.020 or he

00:38:35.520 would not

00:38:35.860 say it's

00:38:36.160 important

00:38:36.600 by definition

00:38:38.120 right

00:38:38.800 so

00:38:40.040 now

00:38:41.380 so what

00:38:42.660 is the

00:38:42.920 best way

00:38:43.320 to get

00:38:43.700 at excess

00:38:44.560 deaths

00:38:44.960 if you

00:38:46.260 were a

00:38:46.540 data analyst

00:38:47.200 and you

00:38:47.480 said I'm

00:38:47.860 trying to

00:38:48.180 figure out

00:38:48.640 if people

00:38:50.080 are dying

00:38:50.620 more from

00:38:51.400 the

00:38:51.580 vaccination

00:38:52.220 so-called

00:38:53.640 vaccination

00:38:54.420 or more

00:38:55.320 from the

00:38:55.640 COVID

00:38:55.880 itself

00:38:56.280 so

00:38:57.660 there's

00:38:58.700 another

00:38:58.940 study

00:38:59.300 in the

00:38:59.780 Journal of

00:39:00.860 American

00:39:01.200 Metal

00:39:01.520 Association

00:39:02.100 November

00:39:03.020 of this

00:39:03.360 year

00:39:03.500 I think

00:39:03.820 and

00:39:04.880 it

00:39:05.340 studied

00:39:05.680 vaccinated

00:39:06.180 counties

00:39:06.840 versus

00:39:07.280 unvaccinated

00:39:08.140 vaccinated

00:39:09.900 versus

00:39:10.400 unvaccinated

00:39:11.140 and when

00:39:11.980 you do

00:39:12.200 it at

00:39:12.400 the

00:39:12.560 county

00:39:12.860 level

00:39:13.240 you have

00:39:14.200 the

00:39:14.380 opportunity

00:39:14.840 to pick

00:39:15.260 counties

00:39:15.720 that are

00:39:15.960 kind of

00:39:16.320 similar

00:39:16.740 like similar

00:39:18.020 demographics

00:39:18.660 and stuff

00:39:19.200 and the

00:39:19.960 only difference

00:39:20.720 is whether

00:39:21.580 they were

00:39:22.760 highly vaccinated

00:39:23.580 or not

00:39:23.980 now if

00:39:24.980 you do

00:39:25.200 this

00:39:25.440 analysis

00:39:25.880 the

00:39:26.760 vaccinated

00:39:27.380 counties

00:39:27.920 do

00:39:28.280 substantially

00:39:29.020 better

00:39:29.480 in

00:39:30.600 survivability

00:39:31.880 than the

00:39:33.220 unvaccinated

00:39:33.920 counties

00:39:34.440 now

00:39:35.880 so

00:39:37.500 that's

00:39:38.060 so then

00:39:39.040 we're done

00:39:39.440 right

00:39:39.720 you got a

00:39:40.720 study

00:39:41.040 that shows

00:39:41.880 very clearly

00:39:42.560 that on

00:39:43.160 average

00:39:43.480 getting

00:39:43.740 vaccinated

00:39:44.320 is

00:39:45.000 correlated

00:39:46.240 with

00:39:46.560 survivability

00:39:47.320 and

00:39:48.360 pretty

00:39:48.760 strong

00:39:49.540 correlation

00:39:50.080 pretty big

00:39:50.940 correlation

00:39:51.320 and then

00:39:52.640 the

00:39:52.780 unvaccinated

00:39:53.380 counties

00:39:53.740 are doing

00:39:54.140 poorly

00:39:54.500 so

00:39:55.480 that's

00:39:55.760 all

00:39:55.880 you

00:39:55.980 need

00:39:56.100 to

00:39:56.220 know

00:39:56.380 right

00:39:56.620 what do

00:39:58.940 you say

00:39:59.240 is that

00:40:00.060 all you

00:40:00.280 need

00:40:00.440 to

00:40:00.540 know

00:40:00.740 yeah

00:40:02.760 both

00:40:03.240 of these

00:40:03.560 are

00:40:03.740 unreliable

00:40:04.420 for

00:40:05.100 different

00:40:05.420 reasons

00:40:05.860 would you

00:40:07.520 have

00:40:07.640 known

00:40:07.840 that

00:40:08.140 would

00:40:09.280 you

00:40:09.420 have

00:40:09.540 known

00:40:09.740 not

00:40:09.960 to

00:40:10.120 trust

00:40:10.400 either

00:40:10.720 of

00:40:10.900 these

00:40:11.180 how

00:40:12.240 many

00:40:12.380 of

00:40:12.500 you

00:40:12.600 knew

00:40:12.740 not

00:40:12.920 to

00:40:13.060 trust

00:40:13.280 either

00:40:13.460 of

00:40:13.580 them

00:40:13.980 and

00:40:14.360 the

00:40:14.480 reason

00:40:14.640 not

00:40:14.840 to

00:40:14.980 trust

00:40:15.200 them

00:40:15.340 is

00:40:15.540 all

00:40:16.220 of

00:40:16.380 our

00:40:16.540 data

00:40:16.840 about

00:40:17.180 the

00:40:17.320 pandemic

00:40:17.700 is

00:40:18.320 suspicious

00:40:18.860 because

00:40:20.240 there's

00:40:20.500 no

00:40:20.680 data

00:40:20.940 that

00:40:21.140 doesn't

00:40:21.360 have

00:40:21.500 a

00:40:21.640 huge

00:40:21.920 financial

00:40:22.420 interest

00:40:22.760 behind

00:40:23.100 it

00:40:23.360 anything

00:40:24.380 that

00:40:24.700 gets

00:40:24.880 even

00:40:25.160 close

00:40:25.780 vaccine

00:40:27.960 mandates

00:40:28.420 skew

00:40:28.700 your

00:40:28.840 oh

00:40:29.060 we'll

00:40:29.220 get

00:40:29.340 to

00:40:29.460 that

00:40:29.720 yeah

00:40:30.400 we'll

00:40:31.140 get

00:40:31.260 to

00:40:31.360 that

00:40:31.700 right

00:40:35.240 so

00:40:35.580 vaccine

00:40:35.920 mandates

00:40:36.400 the

00:40:36.780 mandate

00:40:37.040 itself

00:40:37.400 but

00:40:37.800 here's

00:40:38.020 the

00:40:38.120 other

00:40:38.280 thing

00:40:38.580 that

00:40:38.920 Dr.

00:40:41.080 Malone

00:40:41.560 I think

00:40:42.060 has not

00:40:42.540 included

00:40:42.980 when

00:40:44.220 the

00:40:44.400 vaccinations

00:40:44.980 rolled

00:40:45.680 out

00:40:46.080 and

00:40:47.280 the

00:40:47.640 experts

00:40:48.140 were

00:40:48.380 telling

00:40:48.660 you

00:40:48.900 oh

00:40:49.180 everything's

00:40:49.720 good

00:40:49.920 now

00:40:50.180 because

00:40:50.520 the

00:40:50.640 vaccinations

00:40:51.160 and

00:40:52.080 then

00:40:52.260 you

00:40:52.420 got

00:40:52.700 vaccinated

00:40:53.340 did

00:40:54.740 you

00:40:54.880 change

00:40:55.160 your

00:40:55.320 behavior

00:40:55.700 of

00:40:57.760 course

00:40:58.000 you

00:40:58.220 did

00:40:58.560 the

00:41:00.060 one

00:41:00.540 and

00:41:00.660 only

00:41:00.840 time

00:41:01.220 during

00:41:01.840 the

00:41:02.020 pandemic

00:41:02.400 I

00:41:03.100 was

00:41:03.300 around

00:41:03.700 a lot

00:41:04.100 of

00:41:04.220 people

00:41:04.440 in

00:41:04.600 a

00:41:04.700 closed

00:41:04.960 space

00:41:05.420 just

00:41:05.960 once

00:41:06.380 it

00:41:07.500 was

00:41:07.660 after

00:41:08.060 my

00:41:08.400 vaccinations

00:41:08.920 were

00:41:09.300 effective

00:41:09.740 allegedly

00:41:11.620 effective

00:41:12.180 only

00:41:13.380 once

00:41:13.820 the

00:41:14.320 one

00:41:14.580 time

00:41:14.820 I

00:41:14.980 could

00:41:15.280 have

00:41:15.420 gotten

00:41:15.660 COVID

00:41:16.000 I

00:41:16.720 mean

00:41:16.960 I

00:41:17.760 mean

00:41:17.860 I

00:41:17.980 suppose

00:41:18.240 I

00:41:18.400 could

00:41:18.580 have

00:41:18.660 gotten

00:41:18.820 it

00:41:18.940 any

00:41:19.080 time

00:41:19.260 but

00:41:19.660 the

00:41:19.780 one

00:41:19.940 time

00:41:20.140 I

00:41:20.260 was

00:41:20.380 at

00:41:20.540 high

00:41:20.940 risk

00:41:21.360 to

00:41:21.960 catch

00:41:22.280 it

00:41:22.520 was

00:41:23.300 because

00:41:23.600 I

00:41:23.960 had

00:41:24.120 mistakenly

00:41:24.780 thought

00:41:25.100 that

00:41:25.860 my

00:41:26.060 risk

00:41:26.400 was

00:41:26.640 now

00:41:26.940 basically

00:41:27.460 down

00:41:27.740 to

00:41:27.900 zero

00:41:28.240 because

00:41:29.040 I

00:41:29.140 had

00:41:29.240 been

00:41:29.340 vaccinated

00:41:29.780 you

00:41:30.960 don't

00:41:31.260 think

00:41:31.460 everybody

00:41:31.800 acted

00:41:32.120 the

00:41:32.340 same

00:41:32.500 way

00:41:32.720 so

00:41:34.420 the

00:41:34.760 problem

00:41:35.020 with

00:41:35.280 the

00:41:35.480 everybody

00:41:35.880 dying

00:41:36.360 when

00:41:36.560 the

00:41:36.680 vaccination

00:41:37.180 rolled

00:41:37.580 out

00:41:37.840 is

00:41:38.300 that

00:41:38.460 that's

00:41:38.700 when

00:41:38.840 everybody

00:41:39.180 went

00:41:39.380 outside

00:41:39.860 like

00:41:46.000 everybody

00:41:46.240 acted

00:41:46.540 the

00:41:46.740 same

00:41:47.020 as

00:41:47.600 soon

00:41:47.760 as

00:41:47.880 you

00:41:47.980 thought

00:41:48.160 you

00:41:48.260 were

00:41:48.360 safe

00:41:48.620 you

00:41:48.780 acted

00:41:49.020 differently

00:41:49.400 than

00:41:49.640 when

00:41:49.780 you

00:41:49.900 thought

00:41:50.080 you

00:41:50.180 were

00:41:50.260 less

00:41:50.480 safe

00:41:50.760 now

00:41:51.740 can

00:41:54.060 I

00:41:54.660 tell

00:41:54.920 you

00:41:55.080 that

00:41:55.260 that's

00:41:55.620 the

00:41:55.800 reason

00:41:56.200 it

00:41:58.980 looks

00:41:59.180 like

00:41:59.380 this

00:41:59.700 no

00:42:00.540 I'm

00:42:01.740 telling

00:42:01.940 you

00:42:02.140 it's

00:42:02.360 a

00:42:02.480 more

00:42:02.660 obvious

00:42:03.160 explanation

00:42:03.860 than

00:42:05.580 something

00:42:06.320 else

00:42:06.700 right

00:42:07.460 I'm

00:42:08.040 just

00:42:08.180 saying

00:42:08.380 that

00:42:08.620 if

00:42:09.140 somebody

00:42:09.540 presents

00:42:10.520 data

00:42:11.040 and

00:42:11.820 they

00:42:12.040 don't

00:42:12.900 even

00:42:13.420 mention

00:42:13.920 the

00:42:14.800 most

00:42:15.160 obvious

00:42:15.620 reason

00:42:16.100 for

00:42:16.380 it

00:42:16.600 instead

00:42:17.680 they

00:42:17.900 go

00:42:18.040 for

00:42:18.200 the

00:42:18.420 second

00:42:18.880 or

00:42:19.160 third

00:42:19.560 most

00:42:19.900 likely

00:42:20.320 reason

00:42:20.660 that's

00:42:21.560 somebody

00:42:21.800 you

00:42:21.960 shouldn't

00:42:22.220 trust

00:42:22.620 now

00:42:24.460 am I

00:42:25.280 telling

00:42:25.480 you

00:42:25.680 you

00:42:25.840 shouldn't

00:42:26.120 trust

00:42:26.460 a

00:42:26.860 doctor

00:42:27.200 about

00:42:28.120 the

00:42:28.320 pandemic

00:42:28.740 yes

00:42:30.360 yes

00:42:31.420 you

00:42:32.380 shouldn't

00:42:32.600 trust

00:42:32.820 any

00:42:33.020 doctor

00:42:33.460 about

00:42:34.640 the

00:42:34.840 pandemic

00:42:35.260 they

00:42:36.120 don't

00:42:36.460 have

00:42:36.660 a

00:42:36.780 class

00:42:37.260 on

00:42:37.860 analyzing

00:42:38.300 data

00:42:38.700 they

00:42:39.860 don't

00:42:40.300 who

00:42:41.140 would

00:42:41.280 you

00:42:41.400 trust

00:42:41.720 on

00:42:42.040 this

00:42:42.320 Dr.

00:42:42.880 Malone

00:42:43.220 the

00:42:43.540 expert

00:42:44.020 on

00:42:44.400 all

00:42:44.600 things

00:42:44.960 directly

00:42:46.460 related

00:42:46.960 to

00:42:47.140 mRNA

00:42:47.620 or

00:42:49.220 the

00:42:49.400 person

00:42:49.680 who

00:42:49.860 knows

00:42:50.080 what

00:42:50.280 bullshit

00:42:50.620 looks

00:42:50.920 like

00:42:51.220 the

00:42:53.300 answer

00:42:53.540 is

00:42:53.700 you

00:42:53.820 shouldn't

00:42:54.080 trust

00:42:54.320 either

00:42:54.560 of

00:42:54.720 us

00:42:54.960 right

00:42:55.720 if

00:42:56.500 you're

00:42:56.680 trusting

00:42:56.980 me

00:42:57.460 that's

00:42:58.580 also

00:42:59.020 a

00:42:59.280 mistake

00:42:59.740 the

00:43:00.900 only

00:43:01.140 thing

00:43:01.340 I'm

00:43:01.520 trying

00:43:01.680 to

00:43:01.840 teach

00:43:02.100 you

00:43:02.320 is

00:43:03.080 what

00:43:03.860 pitfalls

00:43:04.460 in

00:43:04.680 analysis

00:43:05.200 I'm

00:43:06.000 not

00:43:06.140 telling

00:43:06.340 you

00:43:06.440 what

00:43:06.540 the

00:43:06.680 answer

00:43:06.920 is

00:43:07.180 how

00:43:07.660 the

00:43:07.780 hell

00:43:07.920 would

00:43:08.080 I

00:43:08.180 know

00:43:08.400 I

00:43:09.860 don't

00:43:10.040 know

00:43:10.260 I

00:43:10.980 really

00:43:11.240 don't

00:43:11.700 I

00:43:12.160 genuinely

00:43:12.820 genuinely

00:43:13.700 don't

00:43:14.620 know

00:43:14.900 if

00:43:16.060 everybody

00:43:17.120 or some

00:43:17.740 groups

00:43:18.100 were better

00:43:18.540 off with

00:43:18.940 the

00:43:19.040 vaccination

00:43:19.560 so-called

00:43:20.620 vaccination

00:43:21.500 I don't

00:43:22.060 know

00:43:22.280 and if

00:43:23.200 you think

00:43:23.540 you know

00:43:24.020 then I

00:43:24.960 would question

00:43:25.460 how you

00:43:25.840 know that

00:43:26.340 because I'm

00:43:27.080 not seeing

00:43:27.440 anything

00:43:27.720 credible

00:43:28.180 I'm seeing

00:43:29.040 lots of

00:43:29.500 data

00:43:29.800 seeing lots

00:43:31.180 of experts

00:43:31.820 seeing lots

00:43:33.260 of anecdotes

00:43:34.040 but nothing

00:43:35.440 I would

00:43:36.040 trust

00:43:36.420 so if

00:43:38.140 you do

00:43:38.480 trust any

00:43:39.260 of that

00:43:39.700 I would

00:43:40.680 say that's

00:43:41.140 an

00:43:41.340 analytical

00:43:41.820 mistake

00:43:43.280 you could

00:43:44.960 certainly

00:43:45.260 be leaning

00:43:46.200 heavily in

00:43:46.820 one direction

00:43:47.420 that would

00:43:48.240 you know

00:43:48.860 that's

00:43:49.040 normal

00:43:49.360 that makes

00:43:49.860 sense

00:43:50.100 but if

00:43:50.800 you're like

00:43:51.100 certain

00:43:51.500 you're

00:43:52.340 locked

00:43:52.660 in

00:43:52.940 that the

00:43:53.800 vaccinations

00:43:54.280 definitely

00:43:54.920 were better

00:43:55.380 than no

00:43:55.760 vaccinations

00:43:56.300 or

00:43:56.740 they're

00:43:57.520 definitely

00:43:57.980 you know

00:43:58.440 either

00:43:58.840 side

00:43:59.180 if

00:44:00.140 you're

00:44:00.380 sure

00:44:00.700 about

00:44:01.000 it

00:44:01.240 that's

00:44:02.560 the only

00:44:03.060 unreasonable

00:44:04.720 position

00:44:05.980 the only

00:44:07.340 reasonable

00:44:07.820 position

00:44:08.300 is

00:44:08.620 I'm not

00:44:09.360 sure

00:44:09.660 but I'm

00:44:10.600 leaning

00:44:10.920 one way

00:44:11.360 or another

00:44:11.660 that's

00:44:11.960 fine

00:44:12.180 leaning

00:44:12.640 is okay

00:44:13.040 please

00:44:15.220 stop with

00:44:15.680 COVID talk

00:44:16.240 this is

00:44:16.640 not

00:44:16.820 COVID talk

00:44:17.460 if you

00:44:18.880 believe

00:44:19.140 this was

00:44:19.500 about

00:44:19.740 COVID

00:44:20.060 you have

00:44:20.940 missed

00:44:21.180 the thread

00:44:21.860 this is

00:44:23.060 about

00:44:23.360 any

00:44:24.140 kind

00:44:24.440 of

00:44:24.580 expert

00:44:25.020 talking

00:44:26.180 about

00:44:26.460 any

00:44:26.780 kind

00:44:27.040 of

00:44:27.160 data

00:44:27.440 if

00:44:28.620 you

00:44:28.980 get

00:44:29.220 that

00:44:29.580 you'll

00:44:29.840 be

00:44:29.940 the

00:44:30.120 smartest

00:44:30.400 people

00:44:30.860 watching

00:44:31.760 the

00:44:32.000 news

00:44:32.300 right

00:44:33.400 so now

00:44:34.100 you see

00:44:34.400 the

00:44:34.540 pattern

00:44:34.880 if

00:44:36.900 it's

00:44:37.080 a

00:44:37.260 scientist

00:44:37.640 showing

00:44:38.300 you

00:44:38.520 data

00:44:38.860 they're

00:44:39.860 outside

00:44:40.180 their

00:44:40.460 field

00:44:40.700 of

00:44:40.840 expertise

00:44:41.260 if

00:44:42.860 it's

00:44:43.240 a

00:44:43.660 doctor

00:44:44.040 showing

00:44:44.460 you

00:44:44.660 data

00:44:44.980 they're

00:44:46.140 outside

00:44:46.520 their

00:44:46.820 area

00:44:47.020 of

00:44:47.160 expertise

00:44:47.620 if

00:44:48.880 it's

00:44:49.100 a

00:44:49.280 journalist

00:44:49.780 showing

00:44:50.780 you

00:44:51.000 data

00:44:51.360 they're

00:44:52.180 outside

00:44:52.560 their

00:44:52.800 area

00:44:53.060 of

00:44:53.220 expertise

00:44:53.680 and

00:44:54.680 every

00:44:54.940 time

00:44:55.160 you

00:44:55.300 think

00:44:55.560 that

00:44:55.840 you're

00:44:56.280 seeing

00:44:56.540 expertise

00:44:57.060 you're

00:44:58.480 wrong

00:44:58.740 you're

00:44:59.840 seeing

00:44:59.980 the

00:45:00.120 opposite

00:45:00.400 so

00:45:02.840 who is

00:45:03.180 credible

00:45:03.540 the

00:45:03.760 answer

00:45:03.980 is

00:45:04.100 nobody

00:45:04.460 in the

00:45:04.860 pandemic

00:45:05.240 in the

00:45:06.400 pandemic

00:45:06.800 you should

00:45:07.340 trust

00:45:07.640 exactly

00:45:08.360 nobody

00:45:08.820 there's

00:45:09.340 just

00:45:09.480 too

00:45:09.660 much

00:45:09.820 money

00:45:10.060 sloshing

00:45:10.500 around

00:45:10.860 and

00:45:11.520 people

00:45:12.280 are so

00:45:12.640 locked

00:45:12.960 into

00:45:13.220 their

00:45:13.540 prior

00:45:14.220 opinions

00:45:14.800 that it

00:45:15.680 would be

00:45:15.980 like a

00:45:16.320 big

00:45:16.460 reputational

00:45:17.280 hit

00:45:17.660 let me

00:45:19.140 take

00:45:19.640 an example

00:45:20.560 let's

00:45:23.160 take

00:45:23.340 Zuby

00:45:23.800 most of

00:45:24.900 you know

00:45:25.120 Zuby

00:45:25.580 Twitter

00:45:27.080 internet

00:45:27.960 rapper

00:45:29.580 and also

00:45:30.440 I'd say

00:45:31.640 public

00:45:32.320 philosopher

00:45:32.920 great

00:45:34.140 guy

00:45:34.520 probably

00:45:36.360 one of

00:45:36.860 the most

00:45:37.120 appreciated

00:45:39.500 and liked

00:45:40.080 personalities

00:45:40.720 on the

00:45:41.040 internet

00:45:41.260 very popular

00:45:41.840 now

00:45:43.020 Zuby

00:45:43.300 has a

00:45:43.580 very

00:45:43.840 clear

00:45:44.440 take

00:45:44.820 on

00:45:45.320 the

00:45:46.440 vaccines

00:45:48.060 and whether

00:45:48.780 they are

00:45:49.100 good or

00:45:49.440 bad

00:45:49.640 right

00:45:49.880 it doesn't

00:45:50.420 matter

00:45:50.580 what his

00:45:50.860 opinion

00:45:51.060 is

00:45:51.320 but

00:45:51.960 what if

00:45:52.360 take

00:45:53.020 somebody

00:45:53.340 who's a

00:45:53.600 public

00:45:53.840 figure

00:45:54.180 like that

00:45:54.580 and really

00:45:54.960 has

00:45:55.240 a brand

00:45:56.600 connection

00:45:57.700 to an

00:45:58.180 opinion

00:45:58.480 that really

00:45:59.280 mattered to

00:45:59.780 the world

00:46:00.200 could they

00:46:01.620 ever change

00:46:02.080 their mind

00:46:02.520 and again

00:46:05.100 I'm not

00:46:05.480 picking on

00:46:05.980 Zuby

00:46:06.260 because he's

00:46:06.700 a plus

00:46:07.720 to the

00:46:08.020 world

00:46:08.280 in every

00:46:08.720 way

00:46:08.980 but

00:46:09.560 anybody

00:46:10.220 could be

00:46:10.640 wrong

00:46:10.900 what if

00:46:11.340 he's

00:46:11.460 wrong

00:46:11.760 or what

00:46:13.320 if I'm

00:46:13.620 wrong

00:46:13.880 now I'm

00:46:15.240 the only

00:46:15.500 one who

00:46:15.880 can't

00:46:16.420 exactly

00:46:16.900 be wrong

00:46:17.520 because

00:46:19.700 I'm telling

00:46:20.340 you the

00:46:20.660 data doesn't

00:46:21.340 support any

00:46:22.100 opinion

00:46:22.440 so if

00:46:24.240 it turns

00:46:24.540 out that

00:46:25.480 later we

00:46:26.200 find out

00:46:26.640 somehow

00:46:27.020 that for

00:46:28.020 sure it

00:46:28.580 was one

00:46:28.920 way or

00:46:29.220 the other

00:46:29.540 will I

00:46:30.900 have to

00:46:31.220 will I

00:46:31.560 have to

00:46:31.800 correct

00:46:32.040 anything

00:46:32.420 I said

00:46:32.860 nope

00:46:34.960 I won't

00:46:36.040 have to

00:46:36.280 correct

00:46:36.520 anything

00:46:36.900 I've

00:46:37.180 ever

00:46:37.340 said

00:46:37.640 I have

00:46:38.620 nothing

00:46:38.940 to

00:46:39.200 correct

00:46:39.540 no matter

00:46:40.000 what we

00:46:40.440 learn in

00:46:40.840 the future

00:46:41.200 but Zuby

00:46:42.020 does

00:46:42.380 Zuby

00:46:43.640 does

00:46:43.960 if it

00:46:45.100 turned

00:46:45.300 down

00:46:45.580 and I'm

00:46:45.920 not saying

00:46:46.260 he's

00:46:46.440 wrong

00:46:46.720 he could

00:46:47.500 be right

00:46:47.820 about

00:46:48.000 everything

00:46:48.340 he's a

00:46:48.800 smart

00:46:49.020 guy

00:46:49.280 right

00:46:49.520 he's

00:46:50.180 smart

00:46:50.500 he pays

00:46:50.920 attention

00:46:51.340 doesn't

00:46:52.200 seem to

00:46:52.600 fall for

00:46:53.000 cognitive

00:46:53.420 dissonance

00:46:54.020 I don't

00:46:54.540 really see

00:46:54.920 that

00:46:55.080 happening

00:46:55.380 so he

00:46:56.760 could be

00:46:57.080 totally

00:46:57.420 right

00:46:57.780 but not

00:46:58.960 because of

00:46:59.360 the data

00:46:59.700 because a

00:47:01.780 rapper is

00:47:02.240 not who

00:47:02.660 you want

00:47:02.920 to look

00:47:03.100 to for

00:47:03.440 the data

00:47:03.840 not a

00:47:05.360 doctor

00:47:05.680 not a

00:47:06.120 scientist

00:47:06.580 not a

00:47:07.500 journalist

00:47:07.920 not a

00:47:08.880 rapper

00:47:09.120 so every

00:47:11.540 time you

00:47:11.980 see somebody

00:47:12.560 you think

00:47:12.940 is an

00:47:13.260 expert

00:47:13.540 but they're

00:47:14.600 talking

00:47:14.920 through the

00:47:15.380 data

00:47:15.680 remember

00:47:16.920 you're not

00:47:17.320 hearing

00:47:17.560 expertise

00:47:18.020 you're hearing

00:47:19.880 somebody in

00:47:20.500 the wrong

00:47:20.840 field

00:47:21.320 talking to

00:47:23.620 you

00:47:24.960 now I'm

00:47:28.080 very interested

00:47:28.880 in hauling

00:47:29.600 here

00:47:29.900 who I

00:47:30.940 always have

00:47:31.280 to hide

00:47:31.580 every day

00:47:32.080 because it's

00:47:34.680 always like

00:47:35.380 the most

00:47:35.720 troll like

00:47:36.340 content

00:47:38.200 and I always

00:47:39.060 wonder if the

00:47:39.640 only thing is to

00:47:40.480 try to get me to

00:47:41.120 react it has

00:47:41.980 nothing to do

00:47:42.520 with the

00:47:42.720 content

00:47:43.040 MRAs

00:47:45.020 targeted

00:47:45.880 all right

00:47:47.700 that was $20

00:47:48.320 you really

00:47:49.020 wasted

00:47:49.420 all right

00:47:50.180 don't spend

00:47:51.220 $20 to give

00:47:52.260 me your opinion

00:47:52.820 of whether the

00:47:53.700 vaccination worked

00:47:54.620 or not

00:47:55.020 that would be

00:47:55.900 the worst

00:47:56.360 money you've

00:47:56.880 ever spent

00:47:57.520 like do you

00:48:00.460 think that

00:48:00.800 you're $20

00:48:01.260 I'm sorry

00:48:01.780 I don't mean

00:48:02.160 to mock you

00:48:02.740 but I think

00:48:04.420 you would be

00:48:04.760 missing the

00:48:05.220 whole plot

00:48:05.860 if you think

00:48:07.020 that anybody's

00:48:07.740 mind could be

00:48:08.340 changed with

00:48:09.160 a one sentence

00:48:10.820 about why

00:48:12.340 something has

00:48:12.900 risks

00:48:13.300 all right

00:48:16.360 and that

00:48:19.660 ladies and 0.98

00:48:20.140 gentlemen

00:48:20.420 is what I

00:48:22.820 wanted to tell

00:48:23.280 you

00:48:23.460 now did

00:48:26.480 I deliver

00:48:26.980 on my

00:48:27.400 promise

00:48:27.820 that I

00:48:28.400 explained to

00:48:29.000 you why

00:48:29.460 we can't

00:48:30.020 agree on

00:48:30.480 everything

00:48:30.820 the reason

00:48:31.800 we can't

00:48:32.260 agree is

00:48:33.380 that we

00:48:34.160 keep thinking

00:48:35.260 that the

00:48:35.740 people showing

00:48:36.400 us the

00:48:36.840 data know

00:48:37.360 what they're

00:48:37.620 talking about

00:48:38.220 but nobody

00:48:39.380 can analyze

00:48:39.940 data and

00:48:40.460 it's all

00:48:40.740 bad

00:48:41.100 so literally

00:48:42.620 it doesn't

00:48:43.100 matter who's

00:48:43.620 talking it's

00:48:44.640 all garbage

00:48:45.480 all garbage

00:48:47.080 right

00:48:47.720 the only people

00:48:49.020 who are right

00:48:49.540 are the ones

00:48:50.000 who don't

00:48:50.360 know

00:48:50.660 everybody else

00:48:52.840 is guessing

00:48:54.320 and trying

00:48:54.920 to tell

00:48:55.280 you that

00:48:55.600 they were

00:48:55.860 right all

00:48:56.300 along

00:48:56.700 and that

00:48:57.980 all right

00:49:00.200 here's a

00:49:06.220 comment not

00:49:06.740 garbage if

00:49:07.400 you get the

00:49:07.740 vaccine you

00:49:08.300 still get

00:49:08.700 covid now

00:49:10.120 is there

00:49:11.440 somebody here

00:49:12.060 who doesn't

00:49:12.700 know the

00:49:13.040 argument and

00:49:14.340 again I'm not

00:49:14.920 saying it's

00:49:15.240 true but

00:49:16.340 have you never

00:49:16.900 heard the

00:49:17.660 argument that

00:49:19.160 the vaccine is

00:49:19.940 supposed to

00:49:20.340 protect you in

00:49:21.600 terms of how

00:49:21.980 sick you get

00:49:22.540 all right now

00:49:23.940 I'm not saying

00:49:24.280 you believe it

00:49:25.000 well have you

00:49:26.180 never heard the

00:49:27.220 argument I'm

00:49:29.320 actually curious

00:49:30.100 seriously have

00:49:32.040 you never heard

00:49:32.720 that argument I'm

00:49:34.320 not backing the

00:49:35.040 argument I'm just

00:49:36.100 asking you have

00:49:36.580 you never heard

00:49:37.420 that it's supposed

00:49:37.960 to keep you

00:49:38.380 healthier no way

00:49:40.620 to know for sure

00:49:41.260 okay again that's

00:49:43.180 the right answer

00:49:43.720 but if you haven't

00:49:44.960 heard the argument

00:49:45.860 then I really worry

00:49:46.880 about your opinion

00:49:47.560 how could you not

00:49:48.280 have heard the

00:49:48.720 argument

00:49:49.020 yeah if you're

00:49:53.280 still talking about

00:49:54.120 whether the shot

00:49:55.120 keeps you from

00:49:56.640 spreading it

00:49:57.400 nobody's on that

00:49:59.600 topic like we've

00:50:01.300 all moved on

00:50:01.860 that's stipulated

00:50:02.660 we all know that

00:50:03.680 it's not going to

00:50:04.140 stop spread

00:50:04.660 there's nobody on

00:50:05.840 the other side of

00:50:06.420 that no point

00:50:07.740 of even bringing

00:50:08.300 it up

00:50:08.640 all right

00:50:11.180 so it blew your

00:50:18.580 mind when I did

00:50:19.320 the whiteboard

00:50:20.020 and the two

00:50:20.420 movies you meet

00:50:21.020 today or

00:50:22.020 otherwise

00:50:23.100 all right

00:50:25.860 does it did

00:50:27.660 anybody have an

00:50:28.620 aha moment

00:50:29.440 I have to check

00:50:30.520 my work here

00:50:31.180 did anybody have

00:50:32.620 an aha moment

00:50:33.380 when I showed you

00:50:34.180 that all of these

00:50:34.840 situations are the

00:50:35.700 same

00:50:35.980 now is it

00:50:43.540 because you

00:50:43.940 were already

00:50:44.300 aware of it

00:50:45.360 it's because

00:50:50.580 locals are

00:50:51.840 they were already

00:50:52.400 aware of it

00:50:52.980 that makes

00:50:54.300 sense

00:50:54.580 and then over

00:50:56.120 on YouTube

00:50:57.840 a little bit

00:50:58.740 different reaction

00:50:59.600 which actually

00:51:00.800 that tracks

00:51:01.660 because I don't

00:51:02.980 know if the

00:51:03.440 YouTube viewers

00:51:04.100 you don't know

00:51:04.620 but since this

00:51:05.320 is more general

00:51:06.040 audience

00:51:06.520 and the locals

00:51:08.260 audience are

00:51:08.960 people who have

00:51:09.480 really paid

00:51:10.240 attention to me

00:51:10.960 longer

00:51:11.320 they do have

00:51:13.060 different opinions

00:51:13.760 there's a big

00:51:15.200 difference between

00:51:15.980 the people who have

00:51:16.880 followed me a long

00:51:17.680 time

00:51:17.960 yeah

00:51:20.220 it's one thing

00:51:24.760 to be aware of

00:51:25.640 it but when you

00:51:26.820 see it in context

00:51:27.840 and I show you

00:51:28.600 the pattern where

00:51:29.400 it's always the

00:51:29.960 case

00:51:30.260 that didn't

00:51:31.160 change how you

00:51:32.180 saw it

00:51:32.620 because I too

00:51:34.560 was aware of

00:51:35.360 it all

00:51:35.740 but until I

00:51:37.540 put it all

00:51:38.080 together

00:51:38.400 I couldn't see

00:51:39.540 how we always

00:51:40.260 have two movies

00:51:41.140 see it explains

00:51:42.440 how we could

00:51:42.900 have two movies

00:51:43.600 and it's entirely

00:51:45.000 about our

00:51:45.700 ability to

00:51:46.640 whether we're

00:51:49.160 sophisticated

00:51:49.920 in trusting

00:51:50.940 data or not

00:51:51.820 so your level

00:51:53.780 of data

00:51:54.400 sophistication

00:51:56.140 really makes

00:51:56.640 a difference

00:51:57.020 here

00:51:57.380 lockdowns

00:52:01.680 were awful

00:52:02.120 we all

00:52:02.720 agree

00:52:03.020 somebody on

00:52:08.180 YouTube says

00:52:08.940 that they don't

00:52:09.500 drink the

00:52:09.880 Kool-Aid

00:52:10.280 yeah you do

00:52:11.220 the YouTube

00:52:13.600 people think

00:52:14.260 they're the ones

00:52:14.920 who don't drink

00:52:15.420 the Kool-Aid

00:52:15.820 you know who

00:52:16.620 is the most

00:52:17.080 hypnotized

00:52:17.780 is the ones

00:52:18.840 who think

00:52:19.180 they weren't

00:52:19.540 drinking any

00:52:20.100 Kool-Aid

00:52:20.560 like if you

00:52:22.220 think that only

00:52:22.940 the other people

00:52:23.540 are drinking

00:52:23.960 the Kool-Aid

00:52:24.560 you're the most

00:52:25.820 lost

00:52:26.380 you could not

00:52:27.760 be more lost

00:52:28.720 than thinking

00:52:29.740 it's the other

00:52:30.420 people drinking

00:52:31.060 the Kool-Aid

00:52:31.680 if you're in

00:52:33.360 that little world

00:52:34.120 I feel so

00:52:36.020 sorry for you

00:52:37.180 Lisa says

00:52:40.720 I pander to

00:52:41.440 my paying

00:52:42.160 crowd on

00:52:42.760 locals

00:52:43.140 that's literally

00:52:45.120 the business

00:52:45.680 model

00:52:46.060 that literally

00:52:47.900 is a description

00:52:48.920 of what that

00:52:50.360 is

00:52:50.700 it's a special

00:52:52.380 group of people

00:52:53.120 who pay extra

00:52:54.180 to be pandered

00:52:55.320 to by me

00:52:56.020 so

00:52:56.920 good analysis

00:52:58.000 I guess

00:53:00.080 I'm grifting

00:53:01.100 watch me grift

00:53:02.880 by charging people

00:53:03.820 for exactly

00:53:04.420 what they know

00:53:04.920 they're getting

00:53:05.300 with my big grift

00:53:06.900 do you think

00:53:10.020 the locals

00:53:10.480 people don't know

00:53:11.160 exactly what

00:53:11.860 they're buying

00:53:12.280 at this point

00:53:13.880 they know

00:53:14.940 exactly what

00:53:15.540 they're getting

00:53:15.900 the people

00:53:18.180 who do

00:53:18.820 the grift

00:53:19.740 thing

00:53:20.680 like everybody

00:53:21.820 who has an opinion

00:53:22.500 is a grifter

00:53:23.160 these days

00:53:23.800 on twitter

00:53:24.360 ah you grifter 0.94

00:53:25.640 Tony says

00:53:29.260 in all caps

00:53:29.980 are you drinking

00:53:31.180 the kool-aid

00:53:31.980 scott

00:53:32.500 Tony

00:53:34.480 I don't know

00:53:36.460 you

00:53:36.820 but

00:53:38.760 I've formed

00:53:40.280 a number of

00:53:40.800 opinions about

00:53:41.440 you from

00:53:41.820 your one

00:53:42.340 comment

00:53:42.860 they're not

00:53:44.600 positive

00:53:45.120 all right

00:53:49.080 was there any

00:53:50.300 so I didn't talk

00:53:51.760 about the

00:53:52.500 omnibus bill

00:53:54.880 because everything

00:53:55.780 you say about it

00:53:56.500 is the same thing

00:53:57.120 everybody says

00:53:57.820 do you want to do

00:53:58.780 the omnibus bill

00:53:59.800 uh the bill

00:54:02.200 the bill is this

00:54:02.780 high

00:54:03.300 uh congress

00:54:04.900 certainly did not

00:54:06.180 read all the

00:54:07.180 pages of the

00:54:08.240 bill

00:54:08.600 it will cause

00:54:10.020 inflation

00:54:10.720 it's a

00:54:11.940 uniparty

00:54:12.940 I don't

00:54:15.260 I don't like

00:54:16.760 congress

00:54:17.360 there's nothing

00:54:19.060 you can say

00:54:19.680 about it

00:54:20.100 is there

00:54:20.460 nothing you can

00:54:22.080 say about it

00:54:22.700 it's just all

00:54:23.620 been said

00:54:24.240 there's nothing

00:54:25.500 to add

00:54:25.940 and you know

00:54:27.360 what it's going

00:54:27.660 to look like

00:54:28.040 the next time

00:54:28.620 they do a

00:54:29.040 unibus

00:54:29.520 let me predict

00:54:30.960 the future

00:54:31.460 the next

00:54:32.720 unibus

00:54:33.440 it's going to

00:54:34.700 be this tall

00:54:35.580 Rand Paul

00:54:36.820 will pose

00:54:37.580 standing in front

00:54:38.420 of the pile

00:54:39.060 he will suggest

00:54:40.320 that most people

00:54:41.020 aren't going to

00:54:41.480 read it

00:54:42.020 people will

00:54:42.900 complain about

00:54:43.720 why we can't

00:54:44.800 have the veto

00:54:45.440 on line item

00:54:46.400 even though

00:54:46.840 it's obvious

00:54:47.320 why

00:54:47.720 because

00:54:48.560 you can't

00:54:49.240 get an

00:54:49.560 agreement

00:54:49.880 without it

00:54:50.580 if you had

00:54:52.080 the line item

00:54:53.080 veto

00:54:53.320 you couldn't

00:54:54.040 negotiate

00:54:54.520 by the way

00:54:55.380 you all know

00:54:55.800 that right

00:54:56.180 do you all

00:54:57.260 know why

00:54:57.720 the line item

00:54:58.520 veto will

00:54:59.120 never happen

00:54:59.700 in Congress

00:55:00.560 like the

00:55:02.400 president

00:55:02.700 will never

00:55:03.100 get that

00:55:03.540 there's a

00:55:04.660 good reason

00:55:05.320 it's not

00:55:06.400 a bad reason

00:55:06.980 the good

00:55:08.200 reason is

00:55:08.700 the only way

00:55:09.140 you can get

00:55:09.580 enough people

00:55:10.060 on one side

00:55:10.720 of a vote

00:55:11.320 is some of

00:55:12.440 them have

00:55:12.700 to be

00:55:12.980 bribed

00:55:13.480 and they're

00:55:14.500 bribed

00:55:14.860 with these

00:55:15.180 little pork

00:55:15.720 things like

00:55:16.260 alright

00:55:17.000 I know

00:55:17.420 you hate

00:55:17.760 this bill

00:55:18.280 and people

00:55:19.080 in your state

00:55:19.620 will be

00:55:19.980 mad at you

00:55:20.480 but if we

00:55:21.520 built

00:55:21.920 like a

00:55:23.900 military base

00:55:25.120 in your state

00:55:25.740 maybe they'd

00:55:27.740 let you be

00:55:28.420 okay with

00:55:28.960 this vote

00:55:29.600 so if you

00:55:30.960 take out

00:55:31.360 the

00:55:31.620 if you have

00:55:32.220 the line

00:55:32.600 item veto

00:55:33.060 you don't

00:55:33.480 get anything

00:55:33.940 done

00:55:34.260 so that's

00:55:35.600 the trade-off

00:55:36.120 it's like

00:55:36.440 two bad

00:55:36.940 situations

00:55:37.480 but we're

00:55:38.700 in the least

00:55:39.220 of the bad

00:55:39.820 see this

00:55:41.820 bugs me

00:55:42.220 like

00:55:42.540 you know

00:55:44.960 the stories

00:55:45.520 of

00:55:45.900 the

00:55:47.440 screw

00:55:48.480 that cost

00:55:49.580 you know

00:55:49.940 $50,000

00:55:51.560 or the

00:55:52.300 hammer

00:55:53.140 for the

00:55:53.560 military

00:55:53.900 project

00:55:54.520 that was

00:55:55.200 like

00:55:55.400 $75,000

00:55:56.420 and then

00:55:57.520 all the

00:55:57.780 people say

00:55:58.260 that's

00:55:59.000 outrageous

00:55:59.520 don't charge

00:56:01.020 $75,000

00:56:01.940 for a hammer

00:56:02.600 and then

00:56:03.440 you find out

00:56:04.320 that the

00:56:04.640 reason it's

00:56:05.080 $75,000

00:56:05.960 is that

00:56:07.460 they had

00:56:07.780 to create

00:56:08.820 and design

00:56:09.380 exactly one

00:56:10.140 hammer

00:56:10.460 that's it

00:56:11.600 it was like

00:56:12.180 one hammer

00:56:12.720 ever

00:56:13.060 and that's

00:56:14.420 why it

00:56:14.660 cost that

00:56:15.020 much

00:56:15.300 exactly

00:56:15.940 like it

00:56:16.420 should

00:56:16.700 so but

00:56:17.940 when the

00:56:18.240 news gets

00:56:18.680 a hold of

00:56:19.060 it

00:56:19.200 they don't

00:56:19.560 know how

00:56:19.800 to do

00:56:20.020 economics

00:56:20.640 so the

00:56:21.860 people report

00:56:22.640 it

00:56:22.860 just say

00:56:23.280 it's an

00:56:23.560 overpriced

00:56:24.140 hammer

00:56:24.500 but then

00:56:25.780 if you look

00:56:26.260 into it

00:56:26.620 even a little

00:56:27.180 bit

00:56:27.560 the people

00:56:28.480 say

00:56:28.800 well we

00:56:29.360 spent

00:56:29.720 $75,000

00:56:31.200 to make

00:56:31.880 the hammer

00:56:32.240 that's not

00:56:33.420 that's not

00:56:34.400 fake

00:56:34.820 it takes

00:56:36.180 a while

00:56:36.620 to design

00:56:37.640 it and

00:56:38.040 create it

00:56:38.660 and if

00:56:39.580 you're only

00:56:39.860 going to

00:56:40.040 make one

00:56:40.540 you've got

00:56:40.820 to make

00:56:41.020 a mold

00:56:41.460 just for

00:56:41.860 one thing

00:56:42.440 $75,000

00:56:43.880 so

00:56:45.200 the public

00:56:47.460 can't even

00:56:47.960 tell the

00:56:48.300 difference

00:56:48.620 between

00:56:49.060 an economic

00:56:49.720 bargain

00:56:50.200 and an

00:56:51.620 outrageous

00:56:52.120 ripoff

00:56:53.120 can't even

00:56:53.720 tell the

00:56:54.000 difference

00:56:54.360 so most

00:56:55.880 of these

00:56:56.080 stories are

00:56:56.500 fake

00:56:56.760 I would

00:56:58.260 like to

00:56:58.620 call out

00:56:59.140 I think

00:56:59.400 I told

00:56:59.680 my local

00:57:00.340 subscribers

00:57:00.860 this once

00:57:01.320 but I'm

00:57:02.080 going to

00:57:02.220 make a

00:57:02.500 prediction

00:57:02.860 do you

00:57:03.940 remember

00:57:04.180 the story

00:57:04.700 about the

00:57:05.080 four minute

00:57:05.580 mile

00:57:05.960 and how

00:57:07.560 it was

00:57:08.980 believed

00:57:09.340 nobody

00:57:09.720 would ever

00:57:10.100 run that

00:57:10.500 fast

00:57:11.020 until one

00:57:12.080 person

00:57:12.380 did

00:57:12.700 and then

00:57:13.820 when one

00:57:14.220 person

00:57:14.500 did

00:57:14.840 then other

00:57:15.520 people

00:57:15.840 could do

00:57:16.880 it too

00:57:17.220 and the

00:57:18.080 way I

00:57:18.420 learned it

00:57:18.840 was

00:57:19.160 that the

00:57:19.980 psychology

00:57:20.640 of it

00:57:21.020 once the

00:57:21.440 psychology

00:57:21.900 was broken

00:57:22.580 then the

00:57:23.820 humans

00:57:24.120 could perform

00:57:24.900 to a higher

00:57:25.380 level

00:57:25.700 I don't

00:57:27.420 believe that

00:57:28.080 I so

00:57:30.220 don't believe

00:57:30.760 that

00:57:31.100 I think

00:57:32.060 it had

00:57:32.260 everything

00:57:32.680 to do

00:57:33.080 with

00:57:33.320 maybe

00:57:33.740 the

00:57:34.040 footwear

00:57:35.020 was better

00:57:36.320 maybe the

00:57:37.620 training

00:57:37.960 was different

00:57:38.520 maybe they

00:57:39.180 learned a little

00:57:39.700 more about

00:57:40.140 nutrition

00:57:40.640 I don't

00:57:41.960 believe that

00:57:42.520 it's like

00:57:43.000 one of the

00:57:43.320 most

00:57:43.540 important

00:57:47.360 formative

00:57:48.320 stories of

00:57:49.160 my entire

00:57:49.780 life

00:57:50.520 was that

00:57:52.240 if you

00:57:52.960 got past

00:57:53.380 your mental

00:57:54.000 block

00:57:55.060 you could

00:57:55.540 do great

00:57:55.960 things

00:57:56.360 and I'll

00:57:57.060 bet none

00:57:57.380 of it

00:57:57.580 was true

00:57:57.940 I'll bet

00:57:59.220 none of

00:57:59.620 that was

00:57:59.920 ever true

00:58:00.360 what do

00:58:01.820 you think

00:58:02.180 yeah

00:58:03.880 could be

00:58:04.340 just the

00:58:04.680 shoes were

00:58:05.060 better

00:58:05.240 like you

00:58:05.600 said

00:58:05.820 could be

00:58:07.960 anything

00:58:08.240 the sound

00:58:12.480 barrier

00:58:12.860 is there

00:58:13.540 a similar

00:58:13.960 story about

00:58:14.500 that

00:58:15.000 Cerno

00:58:20.260 almost going

00:58:20.920 TDS and

00:58:21.600 splitting the

00:58:22.240 base

00:58:22.540 well I don't

00:58:23.940 believe that

00:58:24.460 Trump can

00:58:24.980 ever put

00:58:26.160 the base

00:58:26.560 back together

00:58:27.160 because the

00:58:27.940 vaccination

00:58:28.320 thing

00:58:28.960 by the way

00:58:30.140 I ran

00:58:30.460 a poll

00:58:30.840 how many

00:58:32.660 people thought

00:58:33.200 the vaccination

00:58:33.860 was killing

00:58:34.420 more people

00:58:34.900 than the

00:58:35.500 the COVID

00:58:36.580 and

00:58:38.040 yeah

00:58:39.100 about a

00:58:39.780 quarter of

00:58:40.280 the people

00:58:40.580 think the

00:58:42.280 vaccination is

00:58:43.040 killing more

00:58:43.660 a quarter

00:58:44.540 think that

00:58:45.220 roughly

00:58:46.700 that the

00:58:47.920 vaccine

00:58:48.300 so basically

00:58:50.040 it's split

00:58:52.240 but about

00:58:53.280 half of the

00:58:53.800 respondents

00:58:54.220 says you

00:58:54.720 can't tell

00:58:55.240 so who

00:58:56.540 was right

00:58:56.980 the ones

00:58:58.400 who said

00:58:58.720 vax killed

00:58:59.360 more

00:58:59.680 the people

00:59:00.240 who said

00:59:00.660 that the

00:59:01.200 COVID killed

00:59:01.760 more

00:59:02.080 or the

00:59:03.080 50% or so

00:59:04.220 who said

00:59:04.500 you can't

00:59:04.940 tell

00:59:05.160 who was

00:59:06.260 right

00:59:06.540 the ones

00:59:09.820 who say

00:59:10.080 you can't

00:59:10.460 tell

00:59:10.680 right

00:59:11.660 so that's

00:59:12.560 the better

00:59:13.000 answer

00:59:13.440 but there

00:59:14.560 might be

00:59:14.960 an answer

00:59:15.400 it's just

00:59:16.140 we don't

00:59:16.560 have access

00:59:17.020 to it

00:59:17.440 there might

00:59:17.940 be like a 0.54

00:59:18.420 reality

00:59:18.900 but that's

00:59:20.260 not available

00:59:21.200 to us

00:59:21.740 with our

00:59:23.060 current

00:59:23.320 data

00:59:23.640 yeah

00:59:25.220 and a

00:59:25.860 Twitter poll

00:59:26.320 of course

00:59:26.680 is not

00:59:27.040 meant to

00:59:27.320 be serious

00:59:27.920 of course

00:59:29.160 all right

00:59:30.940 bad question

00:59:37.360 you asked

00:59:37.740 what the

00:59:38.060 media thinks

00:59:38.660 no I

00:59:39.060 didn't

00:59:39.820 reread the

00:59:40.620 question

00:59:40.940 I did

00:59:42.800 not

00:59:43.120 I mean I

00:59:47.020 see why

00:59:47.340 you're saying

00:59:47.620 that

00:59:47.860 I said

00:59:48.280 based on

00:59:49.160 your reliable

00:59:49.860 media sources

00:59:50.660 but that's

00:59:51.320 how everybody

00:59:51.740 gets opinions

00:59:52.380 it's not

00:59:52.920 really about

00:59:53.340 the media

00:59:53.760 well so

01:00:02.140 I see

01:00:02.860 your analogy

01:00:03.480 and that's

01:00:03.960 a good reason

01:00:04.640 why analogies

01:00:05.360 don't work

01:00:05.840 so over

01:00:06.700 on local

01:00:07.060 somebody made

01:00:07.580 the analogy

01:00:08.040 that I tell

01:00:10.100 the story

01:00:10.560 about some

01:00:11.140 of my

01:00:11.440 cubemates

01:00:12.060 when I had

01:00:12.560 a corporate

01:00:13.020 job

01:00:13.400 when I

01:00:14.520 became a

01:00:14.980 successful

01:00:15.380 author

01:00:15.840 I was still

01:00:16.320 in my

01:00:16.600 cubicle

01:00:16.980 and two

01:00:18.240 people in

01:00:19.220 cubicles

01:00:19.620 next to

01:00:20.080 me

01:00:20.260 went on

01:00:21.220 to become

01:00:21.600 successful

01:00:22.140 authors

01:00:22.600 like got

01:00:23.440 books published

01:00:24.320 and I

01:00:25.780 always thought

01:00:26.180 it was because

01:00:26.740 I made it

01:00:27.420 look approachable

01:00:28.180 like they

01:00:29.540 saw me do

01:00:30.120 it and they

01:00:30.440 said well

01:00:31.140 there's nothing

01:00:31.660 magic about

01:00:32.340 you

01:00:32.660 it looks like

01:00:33.880 I could do

01:00:34.300 that too

01:00:34.740 and they

01:00:35.480 were right

01:00:35.820 and then they

01:00:37.000 just did it

01:00:37.680 just like I

01:00:38.580 did

01:00:38.780 so but that's

01:00:40.440 different than

01:00:40.860 the four minute

01:00:41.340 mile

01:00:41.640 the difference

01:00:42.680 is that

01:00:43.560 all of us

01:00:45.000 had the

01:00:45.300 ability

01:00:45.680 like that

01:00:47.440 part was a

01:00:48.060 given

01:00:48.280 it was only

01:00:49.580 thinking of

01:00:50.540 doing it

01:00:51.140 that was

01:00:51.660 different

01:00:52.020 once they

01:00:53.100 thought of

01:00:53.640 doing it

01:00:54.080 then they

01:00:54.580 already had

01:00:55.120 the ability

01:00:55.600 so that

01:00:56.700 but we don't

01:00:57.620 know that

01:00:57.880 that's the

01:00:58.220 same situation

01:00:58.820 with the

01:00:59.200 running

01:00:59.460 we don't

01:01:00.460 know if

01:01:00.720 they had

01:01:01.060 the ability

01:01:01.560 and just

01:01:02.380 didn't use

01:01:03.020 it

01:01:03.260 or if there

01:01:04.500 was something

01:01:04.860 that was

01:01:05.120 changing at

01:01:05.660 about the

01:01:06.020 same time

01:01:06.520 like footwear

01:01:07.640 technology

01:01:08.280 for example

01:01:08.920 but

01:01:10.000 and I've

01:01:11.240 told you

01:01:11.500 before that

01:01:11.980 I definitely

01:01:12.540 doubt

01:01:12.940 the having

01:01:14.320 small amounts

01:01:15.100 of alcohol

01:01:15.760 is good

01:01:16.720 for your

01:01:17.000 health

01:01:17.280 like that

01:01:18.940 is so

01:01:19.320 not going

01:01:19.740 to be

01:01:19.960 true

01:01:20.220 in the

01:01:20.560 long run

01:01:21.000 I would

01:01:22.260 put a

01:01:22.960 large bet

01:01:23.740 if there

01:01:24.720 were any

01:01:25.000 way to

01:01:25.240 actually know

01:01:25.680 for sure

01:01:26.100 that there's

01:01:27.360 no amount

01:01:27.800 of alcohol

01:01:28.200 that's good

01:01:28.620 for you

01:01:29.020 I would

01:01:30.060 at least

01:01:30.360 a very

01:01:30.880 large bet

01:01:31.440 on that

01:01:31.900 when you

01:01:36.020 get the

01:01:36.340 vax again

01:01:37.180 you mean

01:01:38.360 as well

01:01:39.060 I'm not

01:01:39.380 getting the

01:01:39.740 boosters

01:01:40.080 but you

01:01:42.320 can't really

01:01:42.780 go back

01:01:43.380 and act

01:01:44.260 like if

01:01:44.780 you knew

01:01:45.060 what you

01:01:45.380 knew

01:01:45.600 then

01:01:45.940 if I

01:01:47.560 knew

01:01:47.700 what I

01:01:47.980 knew

01:01:48.100 then

01:01:48.360 I'd

01:01:48.580 make

01:01:48.740 the

01:01:48.900 same

01:01:49.060 decision

01:01:49.520 if I

01:01:51.200 know

01:01:51.380 what I

01:01:51.660 know

01:01:51.840 now

01:01:52.320 I don't

01:01:54.460 know

01:01:54.700 because I

01:01:55.520 still would

01:01:55.860 have missed

01:01:56.660 my

01:01:57.080 vacation

01:01:57.780 so

01:01:59.820 I don't

01:02:01.160 know

01:02:01.720 it

01:02:02.020 you also

01:02:04.040 have to

01:02:04.380 make a

01:02:04.700 distinction

01:02:05.100 between

01:02:05.700 making the

01:02:06.860 right decision

01:02:07.520 and getting

01:02:08.500 a good

01:02:08.860 outcome

01:02:09.240 so I

01:02:10.800 would argue

01:02:11.220 that I

01:02:11.660 got the

01:02:11.960 best possible

01:02:12.680 outcome

01:02:13.100 because I

01:02:14.080 have no

01:02:14.540 known

01:02:15.020 complications

01:02:15.740 yet

01:02:16.980 and I

01:02:18.200 had a

01:02:18.640 great

01:02:18.940 vacation

01:02:19.380 and it

01:02:19.840 made me

01:02:20.160 feel more

01:02:20.840 comfortable

01:02:21.260 during the

01:02:21.760 pandemic

01:02:22.140 so for

01:02:23.440 me

01:02:23.780 I only

01:02:24.980 got benefits

01:02:25.720 and I

01:02:26.680 got no

01:02:27.040 downside

01:02:27.500 but

01:02:28.680 does that

01:02:29.580 mean it

01:02:29.820 was a

01:02:30.080 smart

01:02:30.300 decision

01:02:30.740 go

01:02:31.540 it all

01:02:32.460 it all

01:02:32.840 turned out

01:02:33.260 great

01:02:33.680 for me

01:02:34.280 I got

01:02:34.620 everything

01:02:34.960 I got

01:02:35.420 a vacation

01:02:35.920 and no

01:02:36.860 downside

01:02:37.240 so so

01:02:38.640 was it a

01:02:39.020 good decision

01:02:39.500 or a bad

01:02:39.900 decision

01:02:40.300 it's

01:02:42.380 unknown

01:02:42.740 it's

01:02:43.740 unknown

01:02:44.080 exactly

01:02:44.760 there's

01:02:45.560 no way

01:02:45.880 you can

01:02:46.120 know

01:02:46.240 that was

01:02:46.520 a good

01:02:46.740 decision

01:02:47.100 the only

01:02:47.840 thing you

01:02:48.160 can know

01:02:48.460 is what

01:02:48.720 you did

01:02:49.100 I can tell

01:02:50.420 you what

01:02:50.620 I did

01:02:51.060 I can't

01:02:52.140 tell you

01:02:52.700 that was

01:02:52.960 the right

01:02:53.200 decision

01:02:53.580 what if

01:02:54.400 I have

01:02:54.700 some

01:02:54.900 medical

01:02:55.160 problems

01:02:55.540 I don't

01:02:55.780 know

01:02:55.940 about

01:02:56.220 well I

01:02:57.360 don't

01:02:57.520 know

01:02:57.880 right

01:02:58.620 it's

01:02:58.820 unknowable

01:02:59.340 totally

01:03:00.880 unknowable

01:03:01.400 but would

01:03:02.300 you agree

01:03:02.840 that so

01:03:04.120 far

01:03:04.580 I won't

01:03:05.860 say it

01:03:06.140 was the

01:03:06.500 smart

01:03:07.060 decision

01:03:07.520 but would

01:03:08.460 you say

01:03:08.780 so far

01:03:09.500 I got

01:03:10.300 everything

01:03:10.740 I wanted

01:03:11.300 would you

01:03:12.340 agree with

01:03:12.680 that statement

01:03:13.200 I'm one

01:03:14.340 of the

01:03:14.540 people who

01:03:14.940 got everything

01:03:15.500 they wanted

01:03:16.040 because I

01:03:17.100 got the

01:03:17.420 trip

01:03:17.720 and I

01:03:19.000 got no

01:03:19.340 side

01:03:19.560 effects

01:03:19.900 right

01:03:21.200 I had

01:03:22.900 full access

01:03:23.400 to society

01:03:24.280 with no

01:03:25.180 side effects

01:03:25.700 now that

01:03:26.820 doesn't mean

01:03:27.220 it was the

01:03:27.520 right decision

01:03:28.080 because like

01:03:29.820 we said

01:03:30.280 maybe I

01:03:31.380 got lucky

01:03:31.920 you know

01:03:32.980 maybe the

01:03:33.380 odds were

01:03:33.860 bad

01:03:34.360 but I

01:03:35.480 just was

01:03:35.900 one of

01:03:36.160 the lucky

01:03:36.480 ones

01:03:36.800 I have

01:03:37.260 no way

01:03:37.540 to know

01:03:37.840 but if

01:03:40.260 you're

01:03:40.400 making fun

01:03:40.940 of me

01:03:41.320 for getting

01:03:41.860 everything

01:03:42.280 I want

01:03:42.940 based on

01:03:44.000 the path

01:03:44.400 that I

01:03:44.700 took

01:03:44.960 that's

01:03:46.120 kind of

01:03:46.400 sketchy

01:03:46.900 there are

01:03:48.280 a lot

01:03:48.460 of people

01:03:48.780 who mock

01:03:49.340 me

01:03:49.640 for my

01:03:50.480 choices

01:03:50.860 and I

01:03:51.280 think

01:03:51.500 I got

01:03:52.440 everything

01:03:52.800 I want

01:03:53.320 and no

01:03:53.920 downside

01:03:54.300 you did

01:03:56.000 not

01:03:56.400 but you're

01:03:57.660 mocking me

01:03:58.320 shouldn't

01:03:59.460 the person

01:03:59.860 who got

01:04:00.200 everything

01:04:00.580 they wanted

01:04:01.260 at least

01:04:02.540 be given

01:04:03.020 the consideration

01:04:03.620 that at least

01:04:04.480 you didn't

01:04:04.800 do it

01:04:05.040 wrong

01:04:05.360 I can't

01:04:06.660 say I

01:04:06.920 did it

01:04:07.200 right

01:04:07.560 but I

01:04:10.080 didn't fall

01:04:10.540 into a

01:04:10.900 pit hole

01:04:11.240 you got a

01:04:14.120 divorce from

01:04:14.580 the pandemic

01:04:15.080 too

01:04:15.360 how many of

01:04:16.340 you got

01:04:16.780 divorced

01:04:18.280 because of

01:04:18.800 the pandemic

01:04:19.280 no I

01:04:23.040 didn't

01:04:23.260 refute

01:04:23.600 my

01:04:23.800 four

01:04:24.000 miles

01:04:24.240 story

01:04:24.980 oh

01:04:27.860 that's

01:04:28.780 pretty sad

01:04:29.320 boy

01:04:30.420 that was

01:04:30.700 a

01:04:30.880 yeah I

01:04:31.960 think there

01:04:32.280 was some

01:04:32.620 causation

01:04:33.160 it just

01:04:33.540 caused

01:04:33.780 people to

01:04:34.460 interact

01:04:35.240 in a

01:04:35.720 different

01:04:35.960 way

01:04:36.460 you're

01:04:42.600 telling me

01:04:42.920 I'm going

01:04:43.180 to die

01:04:43.560 over at

01:04:43.960 Locals

01:04:44.300 oh you

01:04:46.440 got divorced

01:04:46.880 in advance

01:04:47.420 good

01:04:47.740 good

01:04:48.300 current

01:04:51.840 slutter

01:04:52.180 meter

01:04:52.400 well let

01:04:53.160 me give

01:04:53.400 you a 0.57

01:04:54.020 current

01:04:54.880 update

01:04:55.240 on what

01:04:55.600 I think

01:04:55.860 about the

01:04:56.260 whole

01:04:56.620 Trump

01:04:57.380 running for

01:04:57.880 president

01:04:58.220 situation

01:04:58.800 yes

01:05:00.800 you don't

01:05:02.640 know I

01:05:02.880 got divorced

01:05:03.480 I'm going

01:05:04.480 to cut

01:05:04.980 off the

01:05:05.340 outside people

01:05:06.000 from the

01:05:06.560 locals

01:05:06.920 feed

01:05:07.420 because I

01:05:07.840 think we

01:05:08.140 got some

01:05:08.580 extras

01:05:09.540 there

01:05:09.760 if you

01:05:10.020 want to

01:05:10.340 I'm

01:05:11.040 almost done

01:05:11.480 here

01:05:11.640 anyway

01:05:11.940 all right

01:05:13.120 so if

01:05:13.540 you're not

01:05:13.820 a subscriber

01:05:14.340 you just

01:05:14.760 disappeared

01:05:15.220 you seem

01:05:19.100 happier

01:05:19.420 single

01:05:19.840 totally

01:05:20.640 I'm so

01:05:22.320 much happier

01:05:22.820 single

01:05:23.220 and if

01:05:25.720 you had

01:05:26.320 told me

01:05:26.700 that would

01:05:27.000 be the

01:05:27.280 case

01:05:27.620 I think

01:05:27.960 I would

01:05:28.200 have been

01:05:28.420 surprised

01:05:28.940 but totally

01:05:30.360 happier

01:05:30.760 totally

01:05:31.760 happier

01:05:32.120 I don't

01:05:34.420 know how

01:05:34.660 relationships

01:05:35.180 work

01:05:35.620 I honestly

01:05:36.100 don't

01:05:36.540 like I

01:05:37.200 don't know

01:05:37.420 how anybody

01:05:37.840 does it

01:05:38.640 good

01:05:40.280 let me

01:05:41.120 give you

01:05:41.360 the

01:05:41.580 here

01:05:42.200 here's

01:05:42.540 why I

01:05:42.760 think

01:05:42.980 I don't

01:05:43.940 know how

01:05:44.180 they work

01:05:44.560 let's

01:05:48.600 say a

01:05:48.880 traditional

01:05:49.400 arrangement

01:05:51.800 like old 0.58

01:05:52.580 time

01:05:52.960 old time

01:05:54.420 way

01:05:54.640 where the

01:05:55.480 man is

01:05:56.260 working

01:05:56.600 and the

01:05:58.480 woman 0.99

01:05:59.000 may or

01:05:59.800 may not

01:06:00.060 have kids

01:06:00.720 but that's

01:06:02.200 her kind

01:06:03.060 of domain

01:06:03.560 so she's

01:06:04.200 not working

01:06:04.760 in 2022

01:06:06.720 that can't

01:06:07.600 work

01:06:07.960 that just

01:06:10.880 won't

01:06:11.100 work

01:06:11.400 do you

01:06:11.740 know why

01:06:12.100 what the

01:06:13.240 hell is

01:06:13.440 a woman 0.57

01:06:13.720 going to

01:06:14.000 do all

01:06:14.280 day

01:06:14.540 her kids

01:06:15.700 go to

01:06:16.020 school

01:06:16.400 or once

01:06:17.300 they reach

01:06:17.620 a certain

01:06:17.900 age

01:06:18.220 by the

01:06:18.760 time

01:06:18.920 they're

01:06:19.060 12

01:06:19.420 they just

01:06:20.460 want to

01:06:20.680 go in

01:06:20.940 the room

01:06:21.260 or play

01:06:21.580 with their

01:06:21.860 friends

01:06:22.140 you barely

01:06:22.820 ever see

01:06:23.240 them

01:06:23.400 so what

01:06:25.020 would give

01:06:26.080 a woman 0.57

01:06:26.680 in that

01:06:27.280 situation

01:06:27.800 any

01:06:28.360 satisfying

01:06:30.480 life

01:06:31.040 what's

01:06:32.020 you going

01:06:32.220 to do

01:06:32.400 have lunch

01:06:32.860 with the

01:06:33.140 other

01:06:33.520 moms

01:06:34.340 go to

01:06:35.740 the gym

01:06:36.140 like there's

01:06:37.400 nothing

01:06:37.680 there

01:06:38.020 just

01:06:39.160 support her

01:06:40.100 husband

01:06:40.380 and have

01:06:41.780 his shoes

01:06:42.320 and his

01:06:42.900 martini

01:06:43.460 ready when

01:06:43.900 he gets

01:06:44.140 home

01:06:44.400 like nothing

01:06:45.500 like that

01:06:45.940 works

01:06:46.360 so a

01:06:49.020 situation

01:06:49.420 that can't

01:06:50.020 work

01:06:50.380 like even

01:06:51.640 on paper

01:06:52.120 it doesn't

01:06:52.560 work

01:06:52.820 is the

01:06:53.600 man is

01:06:54.000 working

01:06:54.340 and the

01:06:56.400 woman is 1.00

01:06:56.840 not

01:06:57.140 now I

01:06:58.300 assume if

01:06:58.840 you reverse

01:06:59.340 that it's

01:06:59.780 the same

01:07:00.200 right

01:07:01.100 so let's

01:07:01.920 be a little

01:07:02.520 more 2022

01:07:03.640 if you

01:07:04.720 reverse it

01:07:05.320 and the

01:07:06.260 woman is 1.00

01:07:06.660 the only

01:07:06.960 one working

01:07:07.480 and the

01:07:08.060 man is

01:07:08.480 home not

01:07:08.940 working

01:07:09.340 but let's

01:07:10.340 say he has

01:07:10.760 more child

01:07:11.320 care stuff

01:07:11.900 how is that

01:07:12.640 ever going

01:07:12.960 to work

01:07:13.380 I mean

01:07:14.800 really

01:07:15.080 how will

01:07:16.380 that ever

01:07:16.800 work

01:07:17.220 because what

01:07:17.900 is the

01:07:18.660 guy's

01:07:18.920 purpose

01:07:19.340 the guy

01:07:20.440 has no

01:07:20.780 purpose

01:07:21.260 now every

01:07:23.320 now and

01:07:23.580 then you

01:07:23.820 see a

01:07:24.380 situation

01:07:24.800 where you

01:07:25.140 think

01:07:25.460 somebody

01:07:26.500 figured

01:07:26.900 it out

01:07:27.320 and I

01:07:27.900 think that

01:07:28.220 exists

01:07:28.680 right

01:07:29.020 like everybody

01:07:29.580 is different

01:07:29.980 when I

01:07:30.960 look at

01:07:31.220 for example

01:07:31.640 my universal

01:07:32.900 reference

01:07:33.420 who am I

01:07:34.160 going to

01:07:34.340 mention

01:07:34.580 now

01:07:34.860 who's my

01:07:35.700 universal

01:07:36.220 reference

01:07:36.780 it's like

01:07:37.760 the typo

01:07:38.320 blood

01:07:38.680 there's

01:07:39.600 somebody I

01:07:39.980 mention

01:07:40.240 all the

01:07:40.740 time

01:07:41.200 yeah

01:07:43.320 sort of

01:07:43.620 itch

01:07:43.840 so

01:07:44.660 sort of

01:07:45.060 itch

01:07:45.340 uses

01:07:46.400 social

01:07:46.820 media

01:07:47.220 to

01:07:48.380 show a

01:07:50.060 little

01:07:50.160 behind the

01:07:50.680 scenes

01:07:50.960 at least

01:07:51.260 a little

01:07:51.520 bit

01:07:51.760 of his

01:07:52.360 family

01:07:52.680 life

01:07:53.060 right

01:07:53.860 so

01:07:54.680 but there's

01:07:55.680 a situation

01:07:56.220 where they

01:07:56.560 have a

01:07:56.760 really unique

01:07:57.420 situation

01:07:58.000 where they're

01:07:58.520 both productive

01:07:59.280 but in

01:07:59.800 different ways

01:08:00.540 he has a

01:08:01.460 unique situation

01:08:02.180 where he

01:08:02.540 could be

01:08:02.920 doing a

01:08:03.900 productive

01:08:04.240 thing

01:08:04.700 while he's

01:08:05.240 also home

01:08:05.780 so he can

01:08:06.780 actually do

01:08:07.240 both things

01:08:07.800 now I would

01:08:08.540 say that's a

01:08:09.080 big big

01:08:09.900 exception

01:08:10.420 wouldn't you

01:08:10.960 like I

01:08:12.460 can't speak

01:08:13.180 to the

01:08:13.480 actual

01:08:13.780 quality of

01:08:14.820 his

01:08:14.940 relationship

01:08:15.440 but on

01:08:16.300 paper

01:08:16.640 on paper

01:08:18.220 it looks like

01:08:18.760 he figured

01:08:19.160 it out

01:08:19.500 to me

01:08:20.920 it looks

01:08:21.200 like that's

01:08:21.620 the closest

01:08:22.220 I've seen

01:08:23.600 to a model

01:08:24.200 that could 0.68

01:08:24.780 work

01:08:25.240 again

01:08:25.920 we're on

01:08:26.320 the outside

01:08:26.800 nobody has

01:08:28.220 any idea

01:08:28.680 what anybody's

01:08:29.440 relationship

01:08:29.920 is like

01:08:30.340 on the

01:08:30.580 inside

01:08:30.880 but from

01:08:31.500 the outside

01:08:31.920 at least

01:08:32.340 it works

01:08:32.660 on paper

01:08:33.140 that looks

01:08:34.140 like a

01:08:34.460 thing that

01:08:34.780 could work

01:08:35.140 because those

01:08:35.820 are two

01:08:36.140 people who

01:08:36.640 seem fulfilled

01:08:37.340 and both

01:08:38.980 involved with

01:08:39.560 children

01:08:39.920 that's about

01:08:42.100 it

01:08:42.340 that's as

01:08:42.760 good as

01:08:42.980 you can

01:08:43.180 do

01:08:43.380 but now

01:08:44.700 let's take

01:08:45.020 the other

01:08:45.380 example

01:08:45.740 where

01:08:46.120 they're both

01:08:47.900 high powered

01:08:49.540 high income

01:08:50.360 people

01:08:50.720 and maybe

01:08:52.120 they have

01:08:52.400 kids or

01:08:52.760 not

01:08:53.080 and the

01:08:54.480 kids are

01:08:55.740 handled by

01:08:56.920 other caretakers

01:08:57.780 and stuff

01:08:58.140 because they're

01:08:58.620 both working

01:08:59.180 during the

01:08:59.560 day

01:08:59.780 can that

01:09:00.880 work

01:09:01.240 isn't that

01:09:03.680 just two

01:09:04.380 people who

01:09:05.160 spend the

01:09:06.440 day separately

01:09:07.080 like then

01:09:08.660 they get

01:09:08.980 together and

01:09:09.600 they spend

01:09:10.080 all day

01:09:10.620 with their

01:09:11.620 co-workers

01:09:12.200 who are

01:09:12.740 clean and

01:09:14.180 act nice

01:09:16.220 and they look

01:09:17.360 kind of

01:09:17.640 attractive

01:09:18.080 and then the

01:09:19.200 other one

01:09:19.520 spent all day

01:09:20.140 with you know

01:09:20.680 some men

01:09:21.160 who are

01:09:22.180 successful

01:09:22.760 and you know

01:09:24.140 they got it

01:09:24.500 going on

01:09:25.000 then you come

01:09:26.320 home to your

01:09:26.740 spouse both of

01:09:27.640 you and

01:09:28.740 your spouse

01:09:29.300 you know

01:09:29.560 takes off

01:09:29.980 the makeup

01:09:30.420 and the

01:09:31.300 guy takes

01:09:31.760 off his

01:09:32.140 necktie

01:09:32.680 and then you

01:09:34.120 turn into

01:09:34.540 your slouch

01:09:35.140 selves at

01:09:35.820 home so

01:09:37.000 you're looking

01:09:37.360 at each

01:09:37.720 other as

01:09:38.160 slouches all

01:09:38.820 day long

01:09:39.300 and then you

01:09:40.240 go off to

01:09:40.580 your separate

01:09:41.000 high powered

01:09:41.520 jobs and

01:09:42.160 you're around

01:09:42.640 people who

01:09:43.600 have cleaned

01:09:44.000 up like

01:09:45.260 all those

01:09:45.640 people are

01:09:46.040 slouches at 0.68

01:09:46.640 home too

01:09:47.040 but at

01:09:47.380 work they

01:09:47.780 look like

01:09:48.460 they're

01:09:48.640 killing it

01:09:49.180 that can't

01:09:50.700 work on

01:09:52.360 paper that

01:09:53.380 can't work

01:09:54.060 right now

01:09:56.400 again there

01:09:57.240 are individual

01:09:57.760 differences you

01:09:59.040 could find two

01:10:00.380 people who

01:10:01.220 will make

01:10:01.580 anything work

01:10:02.480 right they're

01:10:03.540 just the right

01:10:04.180 personalities and

01:10:05.040 the right

01:10:05.340 situations and

01:10:06.460 maybe maybe

01:10:07.360 sort of each

01:10:08.220 family is in

01:10:09.560 that situation

01:10:10.220 and good for

01:10:11.180 them you know

01:10:11.880 anybody who

01:10:12.340 could crack

01:10:12.800 this anybody

01:10:14.040 can crack

01:10:14.600 this problem

01:10:15.240 as my

01:10:15.780 respect because

01:10:16.560 it's a tough

01:10:17.020 one

01:10:17.280 but but to

01:10:20.280 me it's just

01:10:20.760 two situations

01:10:21.480 that on paper

01:10:22.420 can't work

01:10:23.100 and that and

01:10:24.200 we've we've

01:10:24.900 we've organized

01:10:26.380 American civilization

01:10:28.820 around two

01:10:30.560 ideas that

01:10:31.340 largely don't

01:10:32.000 even work on

01:10:32.540 paper and

01:10:33.900 then we wonder

01:10:34.380 why they don't

01:10:34.840 work in reality

01:10:35.600 they don't work

01:10:37.460 on paper

01:10:37.920 I mean it

01:10:39.540 shouldn't be a

01:10:40.160 surprise right

01:10:41.520 it should be

01:10:42.320 exactly what you

01:10:43.080 think it

01:10:44.100 should it

01:10:44.500 should and

01:10:45.340 it is it's

01:10:46.580 exactly what

01:10:47.260 you think

01:10:47.780 based on the

01:10:48.980 situation

01:10:49.440 now that

01:10:53.640 said I

01:10:54.460 also know

01:10:55.060 two people

01:10:55.680 who have

01:10:56.280 what looks

01:10:58.320 like one of

01:10:58.720 the best

01:10:59.020 marriages I've

01:10:59.720 ever seen

01:11:00.160 and there

01:11:01.920 are two

01:11:02.320 people who

01:11:03.400 work high

01:11:04.620 power jobs

01:11:05.280 and their

01:11:06.640 kid is out

01:11:07.600 of the nest

01:11:08.480 so there's

01:11:09.500 no kid

01:11:09.860 stuff anymore

01:11:10.720 and but

01:11:12.380 again it's a

01:11:13.080 special case

01:11:13.800 because they

01:11:14.940 got together

01:11:15.420 when they

01:11:15.760 were 16

01:11:17.140 I think

01:11:17.600 right

01:11:18.740 if you

01:11:19.560 get together

01:11:19.960 when you're

01:11:20.260 16 and

01:11:21.080 you never

01:11:21.500 know anybody

01:11:22.160 else after

01:11:22.740 that that's

01:11:24.100 a pretty solid

01:11:24.700 base so

01:11:26.360 every time you

01:11:26.880 see a couple

01:11:27.520 who makes

01:11:27.980 anything work

01:11:28.860 whether it's

01:11:29.880 one working

01:11:30.480 or not or

01:11:31.180 both working

01:11:31.800 whenever you

01:11:32.780 see a work

01:11:33.280 there's always

01:11:33.800 a special case

01:11:34.800 and that's

01:11:35.740 like a really

01:11:36.240 special case

01:11:37.080 you know

01:11:38.200 basically hooking

01:11:39.220 up at 16

01:11:39.940 and never

01:11:40.720 being with

01:11:41.160 anybody else

01:11:41.780 right

01:11:42.700 so good

01:11:44.180 for them

01:11:44.560 I think

01:11:45.520 that I

01:11:46.220 believe they

01:11:46.660 genuinely broke

01:11:47.480 the code

01:11:47.980 they actually

01:11:49.100 figured out

01:11:49.600 how to make

01:11:49.900 it work

01:11:50.280 what is

01:11:53.080 Andrew Tate's

01:11:53.780 theory

01:11:54.040 by the way

01:11:58.440 I am so

01:11:59.380 amused by

01:12:00.000 the Andrew

01:12:00.680 Tate stuff

01:12:01.540 the fact

01:12:05.240 that he's

01:12:05.600 giving like

01:12:06.300 lifestyle and

01:12:07.140 health related

01:12:08.420 advice while

01:12:09.840 he drinks

01:12:10.340 whiskey and

01:12:10.880 smokes cigars

01:12:11.640 and he's

01:12:12.780 giving relationship

01:12:13.640 advice when

01:12:14.580 he clearly

01:12:15.040 has like no

01:12:16.480 relationship

01:12:17.040 working at

01:12:17.640 all

01:12:17.920 and it

01:12:22.100 works

01:12:22.500 like he

01:12:23.260 actually pulls

01:12:23.840 it off

01:12:24.280 so this is

01:12:25.500 a genuine

01:12:26.020 compliment

01:12:26.640 he totally

01:12:27.660 pulls it

01:12:28.100 off

01:12:28.380 and the

01:12:29.860 I think

01:12:31.340 it's the

01:12:31.720 dichotomy

01:12:32.360 or the

01:12:33.140 fact that

01:12:34.260 it doesn't

01:12:34.640 look like

01:12:35.020 it's supposed

01:12:35.480 to look

01:12:35.960 like there's

01:12:36.760 something just

01:12:37.220 off about

01:12:37.740 the whole

01:12:38.040 thing

01:12:38.380 is exactly

01:12:39.260 why he

01:12:40.020 attracts so

01:12:40.840 much energy

01:12:41.360 which I

01:12:42.560 think he

01:12:42.800 does

01:12:42.980 intentionally

01:12:43.380 so it's

01:12:44.320 all good

01:12:44.740 it's all

01:12:45.120 smart

01:12:45.460 but the

01:12:47.520 fact that

01:12:48.320 the fact

01:12:50.540 that he's

01:12:50.940 followed for

01:12:51.500 his advice

01:12:52.260 and even

01:12:53.720 his financial

01:12:54.360 advice

01:12:54.880 his financial

01:12:58.280 advice

01:12:58.660 he's spending

01:12:59.600 his money

01:12:59.980 on like

01:13:00.720 luxury

01:13:01.140 sports cars

01:13:01.980 like that's

01:13:03.120 the worst

01:13:03.620 financial

01:13:04.840 it's not

01:13:05.340 advice

01:13:05.620 but it's

01:13:06.140 the worst

01:13:06.380 example you

01:13:07.180 could ever

01:13:07.460 give anybody

01:13:08.060 have you seen

01:13:09.940 some black

01:13:10.800 leaders talking

01:13:11.700 lately

01:13:12.060 and I say

01:13:13.340 the reason I

01:13:14.320 say black 0.69

01:13:14.780 leaders

01:13:15.160 is so I

01:13:16.040 can give

01:13:16.320 myself some

01:13:16.860 cover

01:13:17.260 right

01:13:18.120 so this

01:13:18.540 is not

01:13:18.900 me

01:13:19.180 this is

01:13:20.180 black

01:13:20.700 leaders

01:13:21.100 you've

01:13:21.680 heard this

01:13:22.020 right

01:13:22.240 so black 0.98

01:13:23.140 leaders

01:13:23.420 saying

01:13:23.760 if you

01:13:24.460 talk to

01:13:24.960 a bunch

01:13:25.860 of

01:13:26.160 you know

01:13:26.960 white kids 0.57

01:13:27.680 or anybody

01:13:28.500 who's not

01:13:28.860 black

01:13:29.220 about their

01:13:30.080 future

01:13:30.480 like what

01:13:31.120 do you

01:13:31.260 want to

01:13:31.500 be

01:13:31.780 you get

01:13:32.940 stuff like

01:13:33.520 oh doctor

01:13:34.260 or programmer

01:13:35.100 or whatever

01:13:35.480 and you talk

01:13:36.440 to black

01:13:36.840 kids

01:13:37.100 this is what

01:13:37.540 black leaders

01:13:38.100 say

01:13:38.340 this is not

01:13:39.000 me being

01:13:39.420 racist

01:13:39.860 I'm telling

01:13:40.740 you what

01:13:41.060 black leaders

01:13:42.120 say about

01:13:42.740 their own

01:13:43.040 people

01:13:43.340 they say

01:13:43.980 you talk

01:13:44.240 to black

01:13:44.620 kids

01:13:44.860 they say

01:13:45.220 I want

01:13:45.460 to play

01:13:45.700 basketball

01:13:46.200 or

01:13:46.640 yeah

01:13:47.580 it's like

01:13:48.320 completely

01:13:48.720 impractical

01:13:49.460 and

01:13:51.260 and the

01:13:52.120 black

01:13:52.360 leaders

01:13:52.680 are like

01:13:53.020 you got

01:13:53.940 to fix

01:13:54.260 that

01:13:54.660 like

01:13:55.680 yeah

01:13:55.920 or rapper

01:13:56.460 right

01:13:56.700 yeah

01:13:56.940 rapper

01:13:57.300 or basketball

01:13:57.800 player

01:13:58.080 or athlete

01:13:58.880 or something

01:13:59.260 and

01:14:00.060 and even

01:14:00.800 the black

01:14:01.200 leaders

01:14:01.480 are like

01:14:01.740 there's no

01:14:02.320 way

01:14:02.540 this works

01:14:03.120 there's no

01:14:04.260 way

01:14:04.460 this could

01:14:04.880 work

01:14:05.240 like

01:14:05.980 we got

01:14:06.420 to fix

01:14:06.740 that

01:14:06.920 what's

01:14:07.160 wrong

01:14:07.340 with that

01:14:07.760 it's a

01:14:08.780 good

01:14:08.900 point

01:14:09.200 it's a

01:14:10.160 good

01:14:10.280 point

01:14:10.580 somebody

01:14:15.340 says that

01:14:15.880 when you

01:14:16.620 survey black

01:14:17.300 kids

01:14:17.660 they say

01:14:18.820 that getting

01:14:19.180 good grades

01:14:19.780 is something

01:14:20.160 white kids 0.57

01:14:20.780 do

01:14:21.040 gotta fix

01:14:22.300 that

01:14:22.660 gotta fix

01:14:23.860 that

01:14:24.140 point

01:14:24.560 of view

01:14:24.860 yeah

01:14:28.860 um

01:14:32.860 would you

01:14:34.100 consider

01:14:34.580 unblocking

01:14:35.340 sticks

01:14:35.700 why

01:14:37.580 should

01:14:37.860 I

01:14:38.100 let me

01:14:39.560 ask you

01:14:39.860 this

01:14:40.140 if

01:14:41.660 somebody

01:14:42.400 shows a

01:14:43.280 pattern

01:14:43.660 of

01:14:43.960 disrespect

01:14:44.500 to you

01:14:45.060 do you

01:14:46.040 think

01:14:46.260 that

01:14:46.500 in the

01:14:47.080 let's

01:14:49.300 say

01:14:49.560 in

01:14:49.960 considering

01:14:50.800 charity

01:14:51.540 and being

01:14:52.300 a good

01:14:52.620 person

01:14:53.020 that

01:14:54.340 the

01:14:54.620 higher

01:14:55.140 level

01:14:55.660 good

01:14:57.300 thing

01:14:57.540 to do

01:14:57.900 would be

01:14:58.220 to forgive

01:14:58.640 them

01:14:58.940 for

01:15:00.240 disrespecting

01:15:01.140 you

01:15:01.300 more

01:15:01.540 than

01:15:01.700 once

01:15:02.140 oh

01:15:08.460 thank

01:15:09.000 you

01:15:09.120 Emily

01:15:09.380 yeah

01:15:11.080 no

01:15:11.700 I've

01:15:12.700 never

01:15:13.000 removed

01:15:14.820 anybody

01:15:15.240 from my

01:15:15.760 life

01:15:16.120 and regretted

01:15:16.880 it

01:15:17.120 have you

01:15:17.980 have you

01:15:18.980 ever removed

01:15:19.540 anybody

01:15:19.840 from your

01:15:20.280 life

01:15:20.680 and then

01:15:21.920 later

01:15:22.220 regretted

01:15:22.720 it

01:15:22.960 I mean

01:15:25.380 maybe it's

01:15:26.020 happened

01:15:26.300 but

01:15:26.660 I don't think

01:15:27.980 it's ever

01:15:28.320 happened

01:15:28.580 to me

01:15:29.000 so

01:15:30.260 so do you

01:15:30.460 think

01:15:30.620 I'll

01:15:30.800 someday

01:15:31.100 regret

01:15:31.700 that

01:15:33.580 that I

01:15:36.240 removed

01:15:36.640 sticks and

01:15:37.100 hammer

01:15:37.280 from my

01:15:38.160 twitter feed

01:15:38.740 I doubt it

01:15:40.120 I've never

01:15:40.820 thought about

01:15:41.260 it yet

01:15:41.700 never thought

01:15:45.060 about it

01:15:45.380 yet

01:15:45.640 so

01:15:47.380 I would

01:15:49.280 if those

01:15:50.340 of you

01:15:50.680 who are

01:15:51.060 enjoying

01:15:51.560 his work

01:15:52.840 want to

01:15:54.400 keep enjoying

01:15:54.980 his work

01:15:55.540 I say

01:15:56.460 great

01:15:56.780 because he

01:15:57.860 hasn't

01:15:58.140 disrespected

01:15:58.740 you

01:15:58.960 right

01:15:59.160 but if

01:16:00.320 he

01:16:00.440 disrespects

01:16:01.120 you

01:16:01.220 in public

01:16:01.760 twice

01:16:02.980 well I'm

01:16:05.960 supposed to

01:16:06.320 wait for

01:16:06.600 the third

01:16:06.940 time

01:16:07.240 what am I

01:16:08.720 supposed to

01:16:09.080 do

01:16:09.200 wait for

01:16:09.540 the third

01:16:09.840 time

01:16:10.120 no

01:16:10.920 he is

01:16:11.860 a bad

01:16:12.440 toxic

01:16:13.220 influence

01:16:14.100 on me

01:16:14.660 now he's

01:16:16.100 not toxic

01:16:16.720 to you

01:16:17.180 so you

01:16:17.540 should be

01:16:17.840 fans

01:16:18.240 because his

01:16:19.340 content is

01:16:19.860 very good

01:16:20.280 I'm a

01:16:21.760 big

01:16:21.980 I'm a

01:16:22.960 big believer

01:16:23.440 in his

01:16:23.880 analytical

01:16:24.340 abilities

01:16:24.980 and he

01:16:26.420 adds value

01:16:27.080 and it's

01:16:27.580 different from

01:16:28.200 what other

01:16:28.720 people are

01:16:29.080 doing

01:16:29.300 so it's

01:16:30.020 all the

01:16:30.280 notes

01:16:30.560 he does

01:16:31.220 a good

01:16:31.460 job

01:16:31.760 but

01:16:32.840 my

01:16:34.300 situation

01:16:35.340 is just

01:16:35.940 personal

01:16:36.340 and

01:16:37.820 I would

01:16:38.660 recommend

01:16:39.380 that you

01:16:39.760 be more

01:16:40.240 like me

01:16:40.920 as opposed

01:16:42.080 to try

01:16:42.440 to change

01:16:42.840 my mind

01:16:43.380 be more

01:16:44.740 like me

01:16:45.220 there's

01:16:45.940 somebody

01:16:46.220 in your

01:16:46.520 life

01:16:46.720 who's

01:16:46.980 disrespecting

01:16:47.700 you over

01:16:48.060 and over

01:16:48.360 again

01:16:48.640 you know

01:16:49.720 that right

01:16:50.140 somebody

01:16:51.380 in your

01:16:51.680 life

01:16:51.860 is

01:16:52.040 disrespecting

01:16:52.840 you over

01:16:53.240 and over

01:16:53.540 again

01:16:53.720 and you

01:16:53.920 just keep

01:16:54.300 coming

01:16:54.540 back

01:16:54.940 stop it

01:16:56.340 don't do

01:16:57.600 it

01:16:57.940 just

01:16:58.460 throw them

01:16:59.460 out of

01:16:59.640 your life

01:17:00.040 and be

01:17:00.320 done with

01:17:00.640 them

01:17:00.760 forever

01:17:01.060 there's

01:17:01.460 plenty

01:17:01.680 of

01:17:01.820 people

01:17:02.080 you don't

01:17:02.520 have to

01:17:02.780 deal with

01:17:03.180 the bad

01:17:03.460 ones

01:17:03.720 yeah

01:17:07.440 all right

01:17:09.040 will I be

01:17:11.060 visited by

01:17:11.600 three ghosts

01:17:12.200 this Christmas

01:17:12.820 good chance

01:17:13.800 worst advice

01:17:18.020 ever

01:17:18.380 oh

01:17:27.040 oh

01:17:27.080 interesting

01:17:28.040 Ruth says

01:17:29.040 I spoke

01:17:30.020 to my

01:17:30.340 doctor

01:17:30.680 and stopped

01:17:31.140 my cholesterol

01:17:31.760 med

01:17:32.080 and one

01:17:32.760 BP

01:17:33.060 med

01:17:33.380 still taking

01:17:33.940 one BP

01:17:34.360 med

01:17:34.680 feel a lot

01:17:35.620 better

01:17:35.960 there you

01:17:37.540 go

01:17:37.860 yeah

01:17:41.480 now again

01:17:42.820 don't

01:17:43.280 don't stop

01:17:43.960 taking any

01:17:44.480 drugs

01:17:44.760 because it's

01:17:45.180 something you

01:17:45.600 heard on

01:17:46.180 my live stream

01:17:46.940 that would be

01:17:47.400 a bad idea

01:17:48.000 all right

01:17:49.780 that's all for

01:17:51.060 now YouTube

01:17:51.700 I'll see you

01:17:52.680 tomorrow

01:17:52.960 bye for now

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - December 21, 2022

Episode 1964 Scott Adams： Why The Country Doesn't Agree On Vaccinations. You Won't Like It

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript