Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1964 Scott Adams： Why The Country Doesn't Agree On Vaccinations. You Won't Like It

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the Highlight of Civilization, Coffee with Scott Adams.

00:00:10.400 There's never been a finer moment, and today, I don't want to get you too excited, in case anybody's got high blood pressure,

00:00:18.900 but there will be two whiteboards today. No! Calm down, calm down. Two whiteboards. You can handle it.

00:00:26.000 And if you'd like to get ready for this, the coup de grace, the height of everything,

00:00:34.340 well, all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or chalice or stein, a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:40.580 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.

00:00:44.620 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure. It's the dopamine of the day. I think it makes everything better.

00:00:50.180 It's cold. The simultaneous sip. Go.

00:00:56.000 Well, Broker, Natalie, I feel the same way about you.

00:01:04.460 We've never been met, but that's how confident I am in your qualities.

00:01:10.940 Well, let's see. Let's see how smart my audience is.

00:01:16.260 I'll tell you that I'm going to prime you with one fact, and then I'm going to stop it. Stop it.

00:01:24.480 Local. The local subscribers are so smart, they answer my questions before I even ask them.

00:01:29.880 Hold on. Hold on.

00:01:32.540 So according to Rasmussen, 42% of voters believe most members of Congress are corrupt.

00:01:37.940 Just let that absorb for a moment.

00:01:44.020 We'll get to the next question.

00:01:46.200 42% of voters believe members of Congress are corrupt.

00:01:50.440 That doesn't seem good, does it?

00:01:53.600 It makes you wonder what the number has to be before the system crumbles.

00:01:58.820 But probably it could be 85% and the system would be stable.

00:02:02.180 Because nobody knows what to do about it.

00:02:05.120 You're like, yeah, I don't know what to do about it.

00:02:07.900 Because it's not like, here's what people don't say.

00:02:11.220 Here's what they don't say.

00:02:13.220 Boy, the other team is corrupt.

00:02:16.080 Right?

00:02:17.920 Now, there's not something on my nose that's a boo-boo.

00:02:22.100 It's a scratch.

00:02:24.600 I know it's distracting because it's like right in the middle of my nose.

00:02:28.400 But it'll be gone eventually.

00:02:30.180 42% think Congress is corrupt.

00:02:35.760 All right.

00:02:36.140 So here's the big question.

00:02:42.660 What percentage of people, according to the Rasmussen poll,

00:02:46.960 what percentage of likely U.S. voters believe that Congress is doing a good or excellent job?

00:02:52.900 How many say they're doing a good or excellent job?

00:02:57.480 Amazing how well you do this.

00:03:00.180 25% is correct.

00:03:02.480 How did you do this?

00:03:04.760 Again, I have the smartest audience in the history of all live streams.

00:03:11.040 I think this is proof.

00:03:12.880 And by the way, by the time I'm done with you today, you will be the smartest audience.

00:03:17.020 I'm going to clear up something for you that by the end of this live stream, you're going

00:03:22.600 to say to yourself, oh, shit, I see it now.

00:03:26.560 Do you think I can do that?

00:03:28.520 Every one of you is going to have that.

00:03:30.180 Every one of you is going to say, oh, shit, I see the pattern now.

00:03:34.860 It's a pattern you haven't seen before.

00:03:36.260 And when you see it, you're going to go, shit, and everything will make sense.

00:03:43.380 Do you think I can deliver that?

00:03:45.600 I'm making a big claim so I can get you excited about thinking I can or cannot do it.

00:03:50.420 All right, all right.

00:03:51.980 Hold on.

00:03:52.540 We'll get to it.

00:03:53.580 I'm going to save it toward the end.

00:03:56.520 Well, I saw an interesting video today by Peter Zayn, who is claiming, and yeah, I don't

00:04:04.020 have sources for this, but I'll put it out there as one smart person saying smart things.

00:04:10.320 Sounded right to me.

00:04:11.320 It goes like this, that solar is overrated, solar power, and the argument is that the

00:04:22.400 peak demand for solar, or no, the peak demand for energy is what time of day?

00:04:27.300 Anybody?

00:04:28.080 What time of day does the night, peak demand is night?

00:04:34.400 So you already have a storage problem, right?

00:04:36.720 Now, someday, someday, there have been big breakthroughs in battery storage, so if there

00:04:42.000 are big breakthroughs in battery storage, we might have a whole different situation, but

00:04:46.000 we're not there yet.

00:04:48.080 Yeah, after 6 p.m., I think, is the peak load.

00:04:52.140 And then how many places on Earth have the right conditions for solar, where you can get

00:04:59.040 enough light?

00:05:00.640 Not that many.

00:05:01.760 Yeah, not that many.

00:05:02.820 Maybe 25%, something like that.

00:05:04.740 But it's a small percentage of the world, so that's the problem.

00:05:09.120 Then you have massive environmental problems in the creation of the actual solar panels.

00:05:15.200 You've got your slave labor, and you've got to use a massive amount of coal power.

00:05:21.020 I don't know why it needs to be coal.

00:05:22.620 I think it just is, because it's China.

00:05:26.320 In other words, it doesn't have to be coal, but that's just the way it's being done.

00:05:29.080 So you've got to use all this coal, carbon-wise.

00:05:33.960 It's a disaster in the production part of it.

00:05:37.100 But then you should make it up later, right?

00:05:39.440 And his argument is, in many places, you'll never make up the difference, because there

00:05:43.820 won't be enough sun, and there won't be enough sun at the right time.

00:05:47.460 Now, this is his argument, right?

00:05:48.940 I'm just presenting it as he presented it.

00:05:51.560 That's not necessarily my argument.

00:05:54.860 Now, he says that, compared to that, that wind is actually looking good.

00:06:01.300 And here's something I didn't know.

00:06:02.860 So this is a new factoid.

00:06:05.600 Apparently, the people who make windmills have learned, they probably knew it all along,

00:06:11.220 but they know how to do something about it now.

00:06:13.580 They learned that the higher the windmill, the more stable the air, and the more of it

00:06:19.500 there is, the more wind and the more stable.

00:06:21.780 But what they couldn't do easily before is to build a high enough tower.

00:06:26.840 And apparently, now they know how to do that.

00:06:29.320 Now, building a windmill also has a carbon footprint, right?

00:06:33.700 It's not free.

00:06:34.960 You know, you have to get materials and mine them, whatever the hell you're doing.

00:06:38.340 But apparently, it's allegedly way less of a carbon problem compared to solar.

00:06:46.500 And the other advantage is you can put the wind in certain places, and you can guarantee

00:06:54.820 that it'll work in those.

00:06:55.800 But wind doesn't work everywhere either.

00:06:58.880 So that's a new interesting fact, that if the wind is, or if the tower is high enough,

00:07:08.660 it's a whole different set of economics.

00:07:10.540 Did you know that?

00:07:11.800 How many people knew that?

00:07:13.720 That that's sort of a big deal, making them taller, could just change the whole economics.

00:07:19.740 I knew taller was better, but I didn't know it would make that much of a difference.

00:07:24.100 Yeah.

00:07:24.660 Okay.

00:07:25.440 Well, good to know.

00:07:26.340 So you are all more informed than the average person about green stuff.

00:07:31.940 And by the time I'm done, man, you're going to be smart.

00:07:34.720 All right.

00:07:35.080 A true story.

00:07:35.820 There's a French hospital.

00:07:38.340 That brought in an 88-year-old man, and his complaint was that he had a World War II artillery

00:07:45.900 shell lodged in his rectum.

00:07:48.620 It was eight inches long, about two inches in diameter.

00:07:51.640 And it was an unexploded World War II artillery shell.

00:07:54.940 And so he goes in the hospital with this artillery shell lodged deep within his rectum.

00:08:02.080 And what did the doctor say when he arrived?

00:08:08.640 Rectum.

00:08:09.540 It practically killed him.

00:08:12.580 I had to do that one.

00:08:14.240 All right.

00:08:14.540 We're going to start with the easy ones.

00:08:16.540 That's the one you could have done at home.

00:08:19.200 Could we agree that was not professional quality?

00:08:21.460 It was below my commercial level of humor.

00:08:28.020 But that's just the warm-up.

00:08:30.440 You didn't think I'm done, right?

00:08:32.620 Oh, no.

00:08:33.400 No.

00:08:33.820 If an 88-year-old man goes into a French hospital with an unexploded World War II ordinance up

00:08:40.560 his ass, do you think I'm going to do one joke and then go home?

00:08:45.080 Have you met me?

00:08:46.700 No.

00:08:47.780 No.

00:08:48.640 What was the other thing the doctor said when they saw what the problem was?

00:08:53.180 Fire in the hole.

00:08:56.960 Anybody?

00:08:58.460 Anybody?

00:08:59.820 Okay.

00:09:00.200 That's not my joke either.

00:09:01.320 That one's from Theodore.

00:09:04.600 Theodore Geftos.

00:09:06.160 Fire in the hole.

00:09:07.540 Now, he did it funnier.

00:09:08.660 He had a hole.

00:09:10.160 Fire in the A-hole.

00:09:11.360 But I thought you would get it without the A.

00:09:13.860 Fire in the hole.

00:09:14.860 Yeah.

00:09:16.740 But I don't think that the headline captured the entire beauty of this story.

00:09:23.640 Now we're going to take it up to professional level.

00:09:26.320 Are you ready?

00:09:27.220 So far, that was sort of amateur citizen-level jokes.

00:09:33.820 We started out easy.

00:09:35.800 Started out easy.

00:09:36.740 I went up to fire in the hole.

00:09:39.800 That's right on the borderline of commercial quality.

00:09:43.760 Now watch me take it up.

00:09:45.340 See, this will be the difference between the professionals and the amateurs.

00:09:49.660 And now, my professional-level joke.

00:09:58.500 Breaking.

00:10:00.260 Doctors ruin the world's best pull-my-finger gag.

00:10:06.380 Now that's professional level.

00:10:08.760 That's the difference.

00:10:10.360 See the difference?

00:10:11.700 Yeah.

00:10:11.940 That's professional-level humor.

00:10:14.080 It's very different.

00:10:14.760 All right, here's a provocative thought, courtesy of Doc Anarchy on Twitter.

00:10:23.920 Also has a substack you might be interested in.

00:10:28.980 And he asked this.

00:10:31.040 Now this is his opinion, right?

00:10:33.200 So I'm not giving you my opinion.

00:10:34.640 This is just a tweet.

00:10:35.440 He says,

00:10:36.940 The newest Twitter files showed the FBI was secretly persuading us to hate China, among other countries.

00:10:43.460 And then he asked this provocative question.

00:10:46.300 How sure are you that China hatred is organic?

00:10:49.840 Have you fallen for FBI propaganda?

00:10:53.600 Who made...

00:10:54.380 What do you think?

00:10:56.200 I love that question.

00:10:57.280 Do you think that our collective feeling about China happened because we read the news and formed our own opinions independently?

00:11:09.100 Do you know what the only real answer to that is?

00:11:11.760 There's only one real answer to that question.

00:11:14.920 You can't know.

00:11:16.900 You can't know.

00:11:18.360 It's unknowable.

00:11:19.880 And it's actually a very good question.

00:11:22.240 Like when you first hear it, you're like, come on.

00:11:24.600 Right?

00:11:25.240 Like your first reaction is, come on.

00:11:27.920 Why would that even happen?

00:11:30.000 Like, who would be doing that?

00:11:31.760 And then you think about it for like a second in the context of everything we've learned in the last two years.

00:11:37.800 And you say to yourself, oh, actually that's the only way it does work.

00:11:43.700 It wouldn't be the exception.

00:11:45.680 It's the only way anything happens.

00:11:49.220 The media assigns your opinion and then you think you came up with it on your own.

00:11:53.740 That's the way everything happens.

00:11:54.840 This wouldn't be the one time.

00:11:58.120 It's everything.

00:11:59.640 There's no exception to that.

00:12:01.560 So yes, yes, your opinions were assigned to you by the media.

00:12:05.540 Now, not necessarily the FBI, but here's the next question.

00:12:11.500 Do you think the FBI, on their own, organically came up with the idea, let's tell everybody to feel bad about China?

00:12:20.960 Were they the originators of the thought that eventually got assigned to the public?

00:12:26.120 Nope.

00:12:30.680 Where did they get it from?

00:12:34.040 Where did the media get it from?

00:12:36.280 Right.

00:12:36.380 So presumably the FBI is as influenced by the media as everybody else, right?

00:12:41.860 Probably everything the FBI knows about China, like 99% of what they know about China, is exactly what you know.

00:12:49.840 Do you think the FBI has any special information that would inform their decisions?

00:12:55.240 Well, yes, they would have special information about bad behavior of China.

00:13:01.060 But I think we know that too, right?

00:13:03.440 Is there anybody who doesn't know China's shipping fentanyl to the cartels?

00:13:07.820 Like, I doubt there's anything that's really, really bad that the public doesn't already believe is true as well.

00:13:14.120 So the question is then, if the FBI is convincing us, who convinced the FBI?

00:13:22.340 That was the media, because that's who convinced everybody.

00:13:25.900 But who convinced the media?

00:13:27.800 Who convinced the media that China was the enemy?

00:13:34.380 Seriously, who did it?

00:13:36.740 The CIA?

00:13:37.820 But who would have convinced them?

00:13:40.420 Like, where did it start with?

00:13:44.440 You could say Trump a little bit.

00:13:46.420 But Trump was saying that China was an adversary.

00:13:50.600 Like, you know, just an economic adversary, basically.

00:13:57.940 It's funny, nobody said me.

00:14:01.000 Nobody said me.

00:14:05.440 Now, here's the fun part.

00:14:08.480 If I did it, I could admit it to you.

00:14:11.740 I could tell you.

00:14:13.060 If I did it, I could just say, I did that.

00:14:15.600 And you wouldn't believe it.

00:14:17.740 If I really did it.

00:14:20.080 Would you agree with that?

00:14:21.840 I'm not saying I did it.

00:14:23.100 I'm saying, if I did that myself, you wouldn't know.

00:14:27.260 And if I told you I did, you'd say, no, you didn't.

00:14:30.240 Or some of you would believe it, because you're biased that way.

00:14:32.500 Some would not believe it, because you're biased the other way.

00:14:35.040 But basically, you would just follow your bias.

00:14:36.980 I could actually change the entire global political structure of the world

00:14:43.520 and tell you I did it, show you how I did it, and you still couldn't see it.

00:14:49.000 That's a true statement.

00:14:52.720 I could change the whole fucking world right in front of you, show you I did it,

00:14:57.560 you still wouldn't see it.

00:14:59.240 It'd be invisible.

00:15:01.060 Now, one of the coolest things about being a hypnotist is knowing how to hide things in plain sight.

00:15:07.240 I do it all the time, and you don't know it, because you can't see it.

00:15:12.400 It's basically the combination of two skills.

00:15:16.040 One is persuasion, and the other is magic tricks.

00:15:20.320 Magic tricks are about getting you to look in the wrong place, or to think in the wrong place.

00:15:25.320 Magic tricks are more about how you think than what you're looking at.

00:15:29.380 So, when I combine the two, I can simply make you look in the wrong place

00:15:34.680 while I'm showing you the right thing.

00:15:36.420 I can hold it right up to you, and you'd be looking over here.

00:15:40.720 You would never even be able to see it.

00:15:42.640 Now, it's the damnedest thing, and there's no way I could explain it to you

00:15:47.240 in a way you'd actually believe that what I'm telling you is true.

00:15:49.720 I could hide anything right in front of you.

00:15:52.920 You'd never see it.

00:15:56.160 So, what is the truth?

00:15:58.100 Am I the reason that opinions about China are so bad at the moment?

00:16:03.920 Well, it does track exactly with the death of my stepson.

00:16:10.080 If you were to look at the news reports, you'd see a very direct correlation.

00:16:15.900 But, there are many variables going on, right?

00:16:20.480 I have a request to hide the dot on my nose, because it's too distracting.

00:16:24.060 I think you're right.

00:16:28.860 So, like I was saying, let's continue with the rest of the show.

00:16:36.680 Let's see if I can do, like, one of the...

00:16:38.300 You know how on TV, when they have a pregnant actress in a sitcom,

00:16:44.180 they have to shoot around the stomach?

00:16:46.840 And you see it immediately, because you know that she's pregnant.

00:16:49.380 It's like all the views are up here.

00:16:51.720 I'm going to try to do that.

00:16:53.660 So, for the rest of the show,

00:16:55.200 I'm going to accidentally be covering it

00:16:58.220 without you being aware

00:16:59.740 that every time I do this,

00:17:03.080 you'll never see it.

00:17:04.980 And so, let's look at the whiteboard.

00:17:08.540 And let's come back.

00:17:10.980 Do you think I can pull this off for another 45 minutes?

00:17:14.600 No, it would be too annoying.

00:17:16.060 Don't look at my dot on my nose.

00:17:17.860 Don't look at the dot on my nose.

00:17:19.920 Whatever you do, do not focus on the dot on my nose.

00:17:23.300 Get it out of your mind.

00:17:24.500 No thinking about the dot on my nose.

00:17:27.600 I think that worked.

00:17:30.320 No, it just made it worse.

00:17:32.320 Moly, moly, moly.

00:17:33.640 I know what you're thinking.

00:17:35.040 Say it.

00:17:36.160 Say it.

00:17:37.240 Moly, moly, moly.

00:17:38.420 Go ahead.

00:17:39.980 I know what you're thinking.

00:17:40.840 Movie reference.

00:17:43.920 All right.

00:17:44.820 And now,

00:17:46.340 to bake your brain like it's never been baked before.

00:17:51.460 But first,

00:17:55.060 have I told you about the so,

00:17:58.120 tell for cognitive dissonance?

00:18:00.860 Have I taught you

00:18:01.720 that when somebody starts their tweet response in debate,

00:18:06.320 so,

00:18:07.440 you're saying

00:18:08.520 that that is always a sign of cognitive dissonance?

00:18:12.520 And that there are two things to look for.

00:18:15.100 First is the word so

00:18:16.280 at the beginning of the sentence.

00:18:18.480 But that's not 100% reliable.

00:18:21.820 It's very close.

00:18:23.280 It's probably 90% reliable.

00:18:25.080 But it's not 100%.

00:18:26.300 Because every once in a while,

00:18:28.300 somebody might use the word so,

00:18:30.060 and it's just a way of talking.

00:18:31.740 Right?

00:18:31.980 Because it's a word.

00:18:33.160 You could use words.

00:18:34.120 But 90% of the time,

00:18:36.860 in the context of a debate,

00:18:38.560 it's a signal that the next thing I'm going to say

00:18:40.660 is nonsense.

00:18:42.960 Now,

00:18:43.460 what is the form of the nonsense?

00:18:45.440 Because this would be the second confirmation.

00:18:48.540 So,

00:18:48.840 if they say something that's nonsense,

00:18:50.500 what kind of nonsense?

00:18:52.480 A special kind.

00:18:54.800 Right.

00:18:55.820 Absurd absolutes.

00:18:57.180 That's one.

00:18:58.820 Where they say,

00:18:59.780 oh,

00:19:00.440 you're saying that 100% of people

00:19:02.980 die from a vaccination,

00:19:04.400 for example.

00:19:05.500 Right?

00:19:05.660 That would be an absurd absolute.

00:19:08.120 The other is word salad.

00:19:10.240 Where you look at the sentence

00:19:11.500 and you say,

00:19:12.440 that doesn't even look like a person

00:19:14.100 who knows how words go together.

00:19:16.300 Right?

00:19:17.260 And then the other is,

00:19:18.480 as was mentioned,

00:19:19.240 your mind reading.

00:19:20.440 Where somebody says,

00:19:21.520 oh,

00:19:22.140 so you're thinking that gravity

00:19:23.740 is really made of chocolate.

00:19:25.460 And you think,

00:19:27.600 literally no one thinks

00:19:29.160 gravity is made of chocolate.

00:19:31.140 Literally no one.

00:19:32.900 And yet,

00:19:33.340 you've read my mind

00:19:34.400 to think that's in there?

00:19:35.940 Right?

00:19:36.140 That's just a clear,

00:19:37.580 clear science.

00:19:39.320 All right.

00:19:39.900 So,

00:19:40.360 when I see a real example

00:19:42.120 of this in the wild,

00:19:43.600 I like to point it out

00:19:44.720 to my audience,

00:19:45.800 because this is one of the things

00:19:47.340 that makes you smarter

00:19:48.120 than other people.

00:19:49.940 Once you can,

00:19:50.860 once you can recognize

00:19:52.080 cognitive dissonance,

00:19:53.600 pull back.

00:19:55.980 You can't talk somebody

00:19:57.220 out of an illusion.

00:19:58.660 If somebody's hallucinating,

00:20:00.360 you can't say,

00:20:01.140 no,

00:20:01.400 you don't see that elephant

00:20:02.400 right in front of you.

00:20:03.760 That doesn't work.

00:20:05.780 It'll never work.

00:20:07.200 So,

00:20:07.640 you have to know,

00:20:08.320 you know,

00:20:08.820 when to make your shot

00:20:09.940 and when to just pull back

00:20:11.540 and say,

00:20:11.920 okay,

00:20:12.280 we're done here.

00:20:13.260 Now,

00:20:13.500 by the way,

00:20:14.400 when you see the so tell,

00:20:16.640 the word so followed

00:20:17.720 by the nonsense,

00:20:19.000 that's when you should

00:20:20.060 declare victory.

00:20:20.800 That is,

00:20:22.220 you unambiguously

00:20:23.520 made a point

00:20:24.900 that just destroyed

00:20:26.000 the other person's mind

00:20:27.240 in real time.

00:20:29.360 Like somebody's mind

00:20:30.180 just fell apart

00:20:30.860 in real time.

00:20:31.660 And it happens so commonly

00:20:32.840 that you don't notice it,

00:20:35.000 right?

00:20:35.380 But I can give you

00:20:36.040 one really specific example

00:20:37.920 that happened this morning.

00:20:41.140 And I'm going to beg you

00:20:43.040 to ignore the content

00:20:44.820 of the disagreement.

00:20:45.900 Because if you start agreeing

00:20:48.560 with either of the two people,

00:20:50.140 you'll miss the point.

00:20:52.000 So,

00:20:52.240 it's not about which one

00:20:52.980 is right,

00:20:53.800 okay?

00:20:54.640 Because you could be wrong

00:20:55.900 and still trigger somebody

00:20:57.620 into cognitive dissonance.

00:20:59.540 Right?

00:20:59.880 So,

00:21:00.360 all that has to happen

00:21:01.480 is somebody

00:21:01.960 sees something

00:21:03.220 in the real world

00:21:03.980 that is contrary

00:21:05.760 to what they believe

00:21:06.840 is true

00:21:07.260 and their whole

00:21:07.880 self-image

00:21:08.880 of who they are

00:21:09.560 and then it happens

00:21:10.680 automatically.

00:21:12.080 So,

00:21:12.400 here's the setup.

00:21:13.240 Somebody named Scott

00:21:16.020 who isn't me

00:21:16.720 said in a tweet

00:21:19.380 about COVID

00:21:21.200 it says

00:21:21.900 the evidence

00:21:22.680 that it reduces

00:21:23.420 the severity

00:21:24.140 of an infection

00:21:24.900 in the most vulnerable

00:21:26.600 appears to be clear.

00:21:28.900 Don't disagree

00:21:29.620 or agree.

00:21:30.440 All right?

00:21:31.140 Don't agree,

00:21:31.920 don't disagree.

00:21:32.520 We're not talking

00:21:33.080 about whether he's

00:21:33.640 right or wrong.

00:21:35.240 He's just saying

00:21:35.860 that the evidence

00:21:36.580 would show

00:21:37.860 that the jabs

00:21:38.800 seem to help

00:21:40.000 people survive.

00:21:41.300 Don't agree

00:21:42.040 or disagree.

00:21:43.240 Now,

00:21:43.920 Todd

00:21:44.300 replies to that

00:21:48.440 with this.

00:21:49.620 So,

00:21:50.400 the new pro-vax

00:21:51.440 argument is,

00:21:52.220 quote,

00:21:52.800 I know my shot

00:21:53.760 endangers you

00:21:54.580 but it makes

00:21:55.420 things safer

00:21:56.080 for me

00:21:56.580 and that's all

00:21:57.500 that matters,

00:21:58.160 unquote.

00:21:58.860 What a selfish

00:21:59.580 position.

00:22:01.260 Do you see it?

00:22:02.540 He starts with so

00:22:03.500 and then he puts

00:22:05.200 in quote

00:22:05.660 something that

00:22:06.300 very much

00:22:06.760 did not happen.

00:22:08.500 This person

00:22:09.020 did not say

00:22:09.840 anything about

00:22:11.320 the shot

00:22:12.140 endangering anybody

00:22:13.180 which is not

00:22:14.060 in evidence

00:22:14.580 at all

00:22:15.060 but it makes

00:22:16.120 things safer

00:22:16.700 for him

00:22:17.240 which is not

00:22:17.920 in evidence

00:22:18.540 that's mind

00:22:19.460 reading

00:22:19.760 and that's

00:22:20.740 all that matters

00:22:21.420 is not in evidence

00:22:22.400 it's mind reading

00:22:23.260 and it's an absolute.

00:22:25.020 So,

00:22:25.340 he's got an absurd

00:22:26.140 absolute

00:22:26.620 that's all that

00:22:27.620 matters.

00:22:28.940 Do you think

00:22:29.540 that poor Scott

00:22:30.400 not me

00:22:31.140 do you think

00:22:32.200 that whatever

00:22:33.600 his actual

00:22:34.300 argument is

00:22:35.060 do you think

00:22:35.920 that his argument

00:22:36.560 is that that's

00:22:37.460 all that matters?

00:22:38.080 that's nobody's

00:22:40.140 argument

00:22:40.460 like literally

00:22:41.520 nobody would have

00:22:42.200 that argument

00:22:42.600 oh that's all

00:22:43.360 that matters

00:22:43.860 in this big

00:22:44.940 complicated situation.

00:22:47.940 So,

00:22:48.940 do you get

00:22:50.040 do you get

00:22:50.820 the lesson

00:22:51.280 when you see

00:22:52.400 the so

00:22:52.920 look for the

00:22:54.240 absurd absolute

00:22:55.320 the mind reading

00:22:56.920 or the word salad

00:22:58.720 sometimes all of them

00:23:00.020 and it is so clear

00:23:02.040 it's just so clear.

00:23:03.320 Now,

00:23:05.540 have you ever

00:23:06.460 wondered why

00:23:07.240 we can't agree

00:23:08.840 on the most

00:23:09.380 basic things

00:23:10.240 like

00:23:11.220 climate change

00:23:13.040 or vaccinations?

00:23:14.560 I actually

00:23:15.420 finally figured out

00:23:16.340 why

00:23:16.680 and it's going

00:23:18.320 to blow your mind

00:23:19.020 because it's actually

00:23:19.660 kind of obvious

00:23:20.320 but you're not

00:23:21.440 going to like it

00:23:22.020 at first.

00:23:23.320 So,

00:23:23.540 some of you

00:23:24.020 are going to get

00:23:24.500 triggered

00:23:24.880 into cognitive

00:23:25.980 dissonance.

00:23:27.380 I'm not doing it

00:23:28.360 intentionally in this

00:23:29.200 case.

00:23:30.000 Sometimes I do it

00:23:30.700 intentionally.

00:23:31.740 I'm not doing it

00:23:32.440 intentionally.

00:23:33.320 So,

00:23:34.280 whatever it is

00:23:35.280 you need to tell

00:23:35.840 your brain

00:23:36.460 to prime yourself

00:23:38.160 there's a very

00:23:39.380 high chance

00:23:40.060 you're going to

00:23:40.400 get triggered

00:23:40.900 in the next moment.

00:23:42.580 Alright?

00:23:44.040 Number one,

00:23:44.940 I'm going to lead

00:23:45.460 you into it slowly

00:23:46.380 so you can sort of

00:23:47.320 get acclimated

00:23:48.120 before you get

00:23:48.640 the hard stuff.

00:23:49.820 Number one,

00:23:51.460 if a climate

00:23:52.660 scientist says

00:23:53.500 here's my

00:23:54.120 projection

00:23:54.900 of what's going

00:23:56.020 to happen

00:23:56.300 into the future

00:23:57.000 I say

00:23:58.280 that's not credible

00:23:59.380 and my critics say

00:24:01.080 why are you

00:24:01.820 doubting science?

00:24:03.320 who's right?

00:24:05.180 I say

00:24:05.900 your prediction

00:24:06.820 of the future

00:24:07.340 is not credible

00:24:08.180 might be right

00:24:09.260 I don't know

00:24:10.360 if it's right

00:24:10.780 or wrong

00:24:11.080 but it's not credible

00:24:11.840 and then

00:24:14.900 my critics say

00:24:15.740 you're

00:24:16.280 being anti-science

00:24:18.220 because all the

00:24:18.940 scientists are

00:24:19.540 on the same page

00:24:20.240 or most of them

00:24:20.980 most of them

00:24:21.420 are on the same page

00:24:21.920 and what is my

00:24:23.700 defense to that

00:24:24.500 do you know?

00:24:25.340 what's my defense?

00:24:27.600 has anybody ever

00:24:28.480 seen me defend

00:24:29.680 that situation?

00:24:33.220 here's my defense

00:24:34.280 if a scientist

00:24:37.440 is telling me science

00:24:38.720 I might defer

00:24:40.120 to the expert

00:24:40.940 who knows more

00:24:42.260 than I do

00:24:42.720 because

00:24:43.560 does a scientist

00:24:45.080 know more

00:24:45.860 about climate change

00:24:47.600 especially if it's

00:24:48.460 their field

00:24:49.040 than I do

00:24:50.140 we all agree

00:24:51.620 yes

00:24:51.940 right?

00:24:52.780 the scientist

00:24:53.500 in climate change

00:24:54.700 knows more

00:24:55.660 than Scott does

00:24:56.500 and so if I were

00:24:57.780 to question

00:24:58.320 the climate scientist

00:24:59.800 that would be

00:25:02.700 sort of a weak

00:25:03.480 position

00:25:03.960 on my side

00:25:05.260 unless I had

00:25:06.000 unless I had

00:25:07.080 some other expert

00:25:07.940 agreed with me

00:25:08.640 I suppose

00:25:09.020 so that's what

00:25:11.840 people see

00:25:12.440 they see this expert

00:25:13.720 and then they see

00:25:14.980 a cartoonist

00:25:15.880 they're like

00:25:16.540 ah

00:25:17.040 who am I going to

00:25:18.240 believe

00:25:18.540 the cartoonist

00:25:19.400 or the expert

00:25:19.940 what's wrong

00:25:21.060 with their analysis?

00:25:22.160 I'll tell you

00:25:22.920 who's the expert

00:25:24.700 on data analysis

00:25:25.660 the scientist

00:25:26.980 or me?

00:25:29.420 well I did it

00:25:30.340 for a living

00:25:30.780 I did data analysis

00:25:32.360 for a living

00:25:32.920 so when I see

00:25:34.440 a scientist

00:25:35.300 show me a data

00:25:37.040 analysis

00:25:37.440 or projection

00:25:38.060 specifically a projection

00:25:39.400 he's talking

00:25:40.620 he's in my domain

00:25:41.380 he's not in his

00:25:42.040 own domain

00:25:42.500 so if I call

00:25:44.060 bullshit

00:25:44.420 on my domain

00:25:46.380 then you should

00:25:48.200 agree with me

00:25:48.760 if you like

00:25:49.220 experts

00:25:49.740 right?

00:25:52.060 I'll bet

00:25:52.440 there's not

00:25:53.180 anybody showing

00:25:54.040 a projection

00:25:55.520 who has done

00:25:56.100 as much work

00:25:56.900 as I have

00:25:57.480 as many hours

00:25:58.300 as I have

00:25:58.760 creating my own

00:26:00.000 projections

00:26:00.440 so I know

00:26:00.920 exactly what

00:26:01.520 the pitfalls

00:26:01.980 are

00:26:02.300 I know

00:26:03.100 who lies

00:26:03.680 why

00:26:04.060 I know

00:26:04.840 the whole

00:26:05.080 dynamic

00:26:05.580 of how

00:26:06.300 these things

00:26:06.780 get biased

00:26:07.380 by everything

00:26:08.560 else

00:26:08.880 alright

00:26:09.920 so that's

00:26:10.260 your first

00:26:10.600 example

00:26:11.000 so this is

00:26:11.680 not a conversation

00:26:12.400 about climate

00:26:12.880 change

00:26:13.280 it's about

00:26:14.440 the expert

00:26:15.360 communicates

00:26:16.820 using a

00:26:17.720 mode

00:26:18.140 data

00:26:19.040 that's not

00:26:20.040 their expertise

00:26:20.760 so you're

00:26:22.120 fooled into

00:26:22.680 thinking you're

00:26:23.200 hearing from

00:26:23.660 an expert

00:26:24.140 but you're

00:26:25.180 not

00:26:25.600 you're hearing

00:26:26.800 an expert

00:26:27.420 outside of

00:26:28.120 his expertise

00:26:28.740 using data

00:26:29.840 whose data

00:26:30.780 is not

00:26:31.100 what

00:26:31.300 that's not

00:26:31.760 science per se

00:26:32.520 now I'm

00:26:33.560 not saying

00:26:33.880 all scientists

00:26:34.720 can't do

00:26:35.960 data analysis

00:26:36.660 I wouldn't say

00:26:37.580 that

00:26:37.940 I'm sure

00:26:38.920 there are

00:26:39.160 plenty

00:26:39.340 who can

00:26:39.700 but you

00:26:40.520 don't know

00:26:41.000 and most

00:26:42.140 of them

00:26:42.400 are not

00:26:42.680 experts

00:26:43.180 now how

00:26:44.080 about doctors

00:26:44.760 are you

00:26:46.360 aware of

00:26:46.760 the course

00:26:47.460 that all

00:26:47.880 doctors

00:26:48.280 are required

00:26:48.860 to take

00:26:49.460 to teach

00:26:50.520 them how

00:26:50.860 to look

00:26:51.140 at data

00:26:51.860 studies

00:26:52.300 have you

00:26:52.900 heard of

00:26:53.100 that course

00:26:53.580 it's called

00:26:54.980 something that

00:26:55.540 doesn't exist

00:26:56.320 it doesn't

00:26:58.020 exist

00:26:58.520 ask them

00:26:59.800 they don't

00:27:00.500 learn how

00:27:00.840 to do

00:27:01.060 data analysis

00:27:01.700 so then

00:27:03.080 COVID happens

00:27:04.000 and what

00:27:05.460 happened when

00:27:06.120 COVID happens

00:27:06.900 there were a

00:27:07.540 whole bunch

00:27:07.880 of doctors

00:27:08.500 and virologists

00:27:10.780 and experts

00:27:11.320 who told

00:27:14.100 us about

00:27:14.500 the data

00:27:14.980 and then

00:27:16.800 we said

00:27:17.360 oh we

00:27:17.960 better believe

00:27:18.700 the doctors

00:27:19.980 but you know

00:27:21.620 what you

00:27:21.980 didn't really

00:27:22.380 hear from

00:27:22.700 the doctors

00:27:23.200 did you

00:27:23.600 the doctors

00:27:25.160 left their

00:27:25.720 field of

00:27:26.160 expertise

00:27:26.680 entered the

00:27:28.180 field of

00:27:28.620 data where

00:27:29.120 they're not

00:27:29.520 experts

00:27:30.000 and then

00:27:31.280 they told

00:27:31.680 you something

00:27:32.220 should you

00:27:33.320 believe the

00:27:33.700 experts

00:27:34.120 well we

00:27:36.380 haven't heard

00:27:36.920 from them

00:27:37.320 you haven't

00:27:38.420 heard from

00:27:38.700 the experts

00:27:39.200 if you

00:27:39.980 heard from

00:27:40.240 a doctor

00:27:40.740 that's the

00:27:41.980 wrong person

00:27:42.600 because it's

00:27:44.540 data

00:27:44.860 data analysis

00:27:45.820 is a whole

00:27:46.380 different field

00:27:46.980 so if a

00:27:48.160 doctor is

00:27:48.720 giving you

00:27:49.080 data analysis

00:27:49.800 are you

00:27:51.100 hearing from

00:27:51.820 an expert

00:27:52.240 no

00:27:53.060 no it's

00:27:53.860 just like

00:27:54.180 climate change

00:27:54.860 right

00:27:56.240 the data

00:27:57.380 expert is a

00:27:57.920 whole different

00:27:58.300 field

00:27:58.620 so if

00:27:59.480 I disagree

00:28:00.060 with some

00:28:00.480 of these

00:28:00.720 data

00:28:01.100 and they're

00:28:02.120 like a

00:28:02.440 big

00:28:02.640 virologist

00:28:03.800 who do

00:28:04.580 you trust

00:28:05.040 the person

00:28:06.140 who can

00:28:06.660 spot

00:28:07.380 bullshit

00:28:07.760 data

00:28:08.220 and has

00:28:09.400 done it

00:28:09.740 for decades

00:28:10.800 at a

00:28:12.420 commercial

00:28:12.760 level

00:28:13.220 people paid

00:28:14.680 me to do

00:28:15.120 it

00:28:15.320 it was

00:28:16.000 actually my

00:28:16.560 job

00:28:17.000 to know

00:28:17.840 what was a

00:28:18.340 good analysis

00:28:19.000 and a bad

00:28:19.480 analysis

00:28:19.880 alright

00:28:20.300 here comes

00:28:22.100 the payoff

00:28:22.540 you ready

00:28:23.040 here's how

00:28:32.640 I get in

00:28:33.080 trouble

00:28:33.360 I'm going

00:28:35.220 to label

00:28:35.520 this the

00:28:35.980 Alex Berenson

00:28:36.780 problem

00:28:37.380 which will

00:28:39.420 take about

00:28:40.000 10 seconds

00:28:40.880 before Alex

00:28:41.780 Berenson gets

00:28:42.560 a bunch of

00:28:43.940 messages

00:28:44.720 saying

00:28:45.660 he's talking

00:28:46.560 about you

00:28:47.120 you better

00:28:48.720 go over there

00:28:49.220 and clear that

00:28:49.840 up because

00:28:50.260 he's going

00:28:50.560 to cause

00:28:50.920 some trouble

00:28:51.320 for you

00:28:51.720 so

00:28:52.780 let me

00:28:54.180 start by

00:28:54.720 a compliment

00:28:55.620 to Alex

00:28:56.240 Berenson

00:28:56.620 so

00:28:58.640 let me

00:28:59.440 start

00:28:59.660 while I

00:29:01.460 often disagree

00:29:02.340 with the

00:29:03.580 people who

00:29:04.000 are the

00:29:04.280 rogue

00:29:04.880 the rogue

00:29:06.760 voices

00:29:07.220 you know

00:29:07.600 the ones

00:29:07.920 who are

00:29:08.260 outside the

00:29:08.860 mainstream

00:29:09.180 well I

00:29:10.140 often say

00:29:10.680 that they're

00:29:11.080 wrong

00:29:11.440 because I

00:29:12.780 think overall

00:29:13.320 they're usually

00:29:13.800 wrong

00:29:14.160 on topics

00:29:15.820 in general

00:29:16.380 right

00:29:16.940 the ones

00:29:17.600 who are

00:29:17.760 outside the

00:29:18.240 mainstream

00:29:18.580 are usually

00:29:19.080 wrong

00:29:19.440 but every

00:29:20.280 now and

00:29:20.600 then they're

00:29:20.960 the only

00:29:21.220 ones

00:29:21.440 who are

00:29:21.620 right

00:29:21.920 would you

00:29:23.160 agree

00:29:23.420 every now

00:29:24.760 and then

00:29:25.200 they're the

00:29:26.320 only ones

00:29:26.840 who are

00:29:27.060 right

00:29:27.360 so

00:29:28.820 let me

00:29:30.060 give a

00:29:30.600 big thumbs

00:29:31.660 up

00:29:32.020 and even

00:29:33.140 an applause

00:29:33.780 for the

00:29:34.360 Alex

00:29:34.620 Berenson's

00:29:35.260 we need

00:29:37.140 more Alex

00:29:37.680 Berenson's

00:29:38.240 would you

00:29:38.480 agree

00:29:38.740 everybody

00:29:39.560 so as

00:29:41.020 a patriot

00:29:41.960 A plus

00:29:43.240 can we

00:29:44.720 all be

00:29:45.040 on the

00:29:45.280 same

00:29:45.560 page

00:29:47.820 it

00:29:48.700 it looked

00:29:48.960 like he

00:29:49.300 was trying

00:29:49.640 to help

00:29:50.120 it looked

00:29:51.840 like he

00:29:52.200 spotted a

00:29:52.780 problem

00:29:53.140 that he

00:29:53.500 thought was

00:29:53.960 very important

00:29:55.280 to spread

00:29:56.380 looks like he

00:29:57.840 took some

00:29:58.200 personal risk

00:29:59.000 a lot of

00:29:59.420 it actually

00:29:59.880 to do it

00:30:00.980 now

00:30:01.880 if you're

00:30:04.020 new to me

00:30:04.500 does that

00:30:04.920 mean I

00:30:05.260 agree with

00:30:05.960 the Alex

00:30:06.460 Berenson

00:30:06.880 point of

00:30:07.640 view

00:30:07.820 right

00:30:08.800 those of

00:30:09.260 you know

00:30:09.540 me know

00:30:09.840 that's not

00:30:10.240 what's

00:30:10.460 happening

00:30:10.740 I'm saying

00:30:11.960 that

00:30:12.380 I told

00:30:14.700 you I

00:30:15.000 think

00:30:15.160 yesterday

00:30:15.540 I'm going

00:30:16.280 to spend

00:30:16.640 between now

00:30:17.400 and the

00:30:17.640 end of

00:30:17.920 this year

00:30:18.420 giving

00:30:19.660 people

00:30:20.140 as much

00:30:21.300 appreciation

00:30:21.980 as I

00:30:22.460 can

00:30:22.700 I feel

00:30:23.880 it's just

00:30:24.140 a good

00:30:24.420 exercise

00:30:24.980 at the

00:30:25.340 end of

00:30:25.560 the year

00:30:25.780 right

00:30:26.040 so I'm

00:30:26.800 going to

00:30:27.000 appreciate

00:30:27.740 Alex

00:30:28.900 Berenson

00:30:29.260 and we're

00:30:29.980 going to

00:30:30.200 talk about

00:30:30.620 Dr.

00:30:31.800 Malone

00:30:32.160 next

00:30:32.760 I

00:30:33.880 appreciate

00:30:34.440 Dr.

00:30:35.800 Malone

00:30:36.160 heroes

00:30:38.080 patriots

00:30:39.260 but I

00:30:40.040 don't know

00:30:40.260 if they're

00:30:40.500 right

00:30:40.860 you need

00:30:42.300 to hear

00:30:42.500 that part

00:30:42.880 really

00:30:43.140 clearly

00:30:43.540 I don't

00:30:44.420 know

00:30:44.540 if they're

00:30:44.780 right

00:30:45.160 how would

00:30:47.380 I know

00:30:47.720 I mean

00:30:48.240 it's

00:30:49.080 impossible

00:30:49.460 to know

00:30:49.900 but I

00:30:51.020 appreciate

00:30:51.440 the hell

00:30:51.820 out of

00:30:52.100 okay

00:30:52.640 so we

00:30:53.240 can start

00:30:53.600 with that

00:30:53.900 right

00:30:54.140 and then

00:30:55.160 you'll

00:30:55.560 know

00:30:55.680 I'm not

00:30:56.100 I'm not

00:30:56.800 just being

00:30:57.140 a dick

00:30:57.520 okay

00:30:58.060 I'll call

00:31:00.720 it the

00:31:00.900 Alex Berenson

00:31:01.480 problem

00:31:02.120 but I

00:31:03.240 think the

00:31:03.560 problem

00:31:03.860 might be

00:31:04.240 on your

00:31:04.580 end

00:31:04.900 not his

00:31:05.480 end

00:31:05.720 okay

00:31:05.980 so

00:31:07.340 here's

00:31:08.540 the fact

00:31:09.040 so there's

00:31:09.840 some data

00:31:10.300 and we

00:31:11.020 don't trust

00:31:11.520 any data

00:31:12.080 but there

00:31:13.020 is data

00:31:13.480 that says

00:31:14.580 that there

00:31:15.340 are more

00:31:15.660 vaxxed people

00:31:16.640 getting infected

00:31:17.400 than non-vaxxed

00:31:18.460 how do you

00:31:19.340 interpret that

00:31:19.940 well

00:31:21.020 the way that

00:31:22.840 Alex Berenson

00:31:23.820 is suggesting

00:31:25.120 and I would

00:31:26.280 say

00:31:26.520 I would say

00:31:27.140 it's more

00:31:27.580 the way he

00:31:28.760 words it

00:31:29.360 I don't think

00:31:29.940 he said it

00:31:30.400 directly

00:31:30.740 but you

00:31:32.180 could maybe

00:31:32.560 correct me

00:31:33.180 but he's

00:31:34.120 suggesting

00:31:34.520 that there's

00:31:35.100 something about

00:31:35.540 getting the

00:31:36.000 vax

00:31:36.380 that makes

00:31:37.280 you more

00:31:37.620 vulnerable

00:31:38.060 to COVID

00:31:38.640 because

00:31:39.660 the data

00:31:40.760 says that

00:31:41.340 there are

00:31:41.580 more

00:31:41.760 vaxxed people

00:31:42.500 getting infected

00:31:43.220 these days

00:31:43.840 than non-vaxxed

00:31:45.140 so certainly

00:31:45.940 if you

00:31:46.340 if you

00:31:46.780 hoped

00:31:47.060 that your

00:31:47.480 vaccinations

00:31:48.120 were actual

00:31:49.600 vaccinations

00:31:50.220 this would be

00:31:51.440 a disaster

00:31:52.060 can we all

00:31:53.240 agree on that

00:31:53.920 that would be

00:31:55.300 a disaster

00:31:55.760 but there's

00:31:57.040 another

00:31:57.260 interpretation

00:31:57.860 that the

00:31:59.580 data shows

00:32:00.400 what it

00:32:00.860 shows

00:32:01.260 because

00:32:01.860 vulnerable

00:32:02.260 people

00:32:02.540 are more

00:32:03.260 likely to get

00:32:03.860 a vax

00:32:04.340 wouldn't you

00:32:07.300 expect

00:32:07.740 that most

00:32:08.600 the people

00:32:09.420 who got

00:32:09.920 vaxed

00:32:10.480 are also

00:32:12.040 the ones

00:32:12.580 who

00:32:12.900 were most

00:32:14.180 vulnerable

00:32:14.520 no

00:32:19.100 no

00:32:20.420 let's

00:32:22.400 let's break

00:32:22.900 it down

00:32:23.260 in general

00:32:24.420 are the people

00:32:25.240 most vulnerable

00:32:25.940 most likely

00:32:26.580 to get

00:32:27.080 a vaccination

00:32:27.720 yes or no

00:32:28.480 are the people

00:32:30.280 most vulnerable

00:32:31.220 most likely

00:32:32.280 to get vaccinated

00:32:32.920 right

00:32:33.720 so you would

00:32:34.820 expect

00:32:35.200 that there

00:32:35.800 would be

00:32:36.040 the most

00:32:36.460 deaths

00:32:37.080 in the people

00:32:38.260 who had

00:32:38.480 the most

00:32:38.800 vaccinations

00:32:39.440 would you

00:32:39.920 because even

00:32:41.940 if it works

00:32:42.760 a little bit

00:32:43.800 even if

00:32:44.480 remember that's

00:32:45.160 just if

00:32:45.560 even if it

00:32:46.500 works a little

00:32:47.000 bit

00:32:47.280 the people

00:32:48.380 most likely

00:32:49.060 to die

00:32:49.500 get most

00:32:49.940 of the

00:32:50.120 vaccinations

00:32:50.640 and it

00:32:51.620 does

00:32:51.940 whatever

00:32:52.340 it does

00:32:52.920 but still

00:32:53.500 that group

00:32:53.960 would be

00:32:54.220 the most

00:32:54.520 likely

00:32:54.820 to die

00:32:55.260 so if

00:32:56.400 you saw

00:32:56.740 that the

00:32:57.040 people

00:32:57.220 most likely

00:32:57.840 to die

00:32:58.500 were the

00:32:59.720 ones who

00:33:00.080 are also

00:33:00.580 most likely

00:33:01.340 to be

00:33:01.620 vaccinated

00:33:02.080 would you

00:33:02.920 conclude

00:33:03.300 that the

00:33:03.640 vaccination

00:33:03.980 was killing

00:33:04.600 them

00:33:04.820 would that

00:33:06.220 be how

00:33:06.500 you

00:33:06.680 analyze

00:33:07.080 that

00:33:07.360 would you

00:33:08.380 assume

00:33:08.700 that the

00:33:09.040 correlation

00:33:09.420 is high

00:33:10.020 so one

00:33:11.060 is causing

00:33:11.620 the other

00:33:12.020 some say

00:33:12.700 yes

00:33:13.040 some say

00:33:13.920 yes

00:33:14.160 yeah

00:33:14.660 so that

00:33:15.200 would be

00:33:15.460 an analysis

00:33:16.560 mistake

00:33:17.340 because that

00:33:18.980 would be

00:33:19.240 confusing

00:33:19.720 correlation

00:33:20.560 two things

00:33:21.800 that move

00:33:22.280 together

00:33:22.720 with one

00:33:23.760 causing

00:33:24.220 the other

00:33:24.620 right

00:33:25.440 now

00:33:26.460 would you

00:33:28.160 expect

00:33:28.540 a

00:33:29.000 journalist

00:33:30.800 even a

00:33:32.060 very good

00:33:32.420 one

00:33:32.600 very educated

00:33:33.300 one

00:33:33.540 went to a

00:33:34.040 good college

00:33:34.520 etc

00:33:34.820 wouldn't you

00:33:35.920 would you

00:33:36.420 expect him

00:33:37.060 to know

00:33:37.380 the difference

00:33:38.140 between

00:33:39.680 correlation

00:33:40.380 and causation

00:33:41.260 do you

00:33:42.000 think that

00:33:42.720 a journalist

00:33:43.260 would be

00:33:43.660 good at

00:33:44.000 teasing out

00:33:44.600 that difference

00:33:45.180 it's not

00:33:46.620 really the

00:33:47.000 right expertise

00:33:47.600 is it

00:33:48.140 so

00:33:49.680 so you

00:33:51.900 have to

00:33:52.320 you know

00:33:53.400 put that

00:33:54.260 in your

00:33:55.280 head

00:33:55.400 okay

00:33:55.840 now

00:33:56.240 how about

00:33:56.740 me

00:33:57.020 I've told

00:33:58.420 you I have

00:33:58.760 lots of

00:33:59.320 experience

00:33:59.700 in data

00:34:00.120 analysis

00:34:00.500 and I

00:34:01.280 haven't

00:34:01.540 looked into

00:34:02.020 this at

00:34:02.400 all

00:34:02.720 haven't

00:34:03.760 looked into

00:34:04.160 it at

00:34:04.440 all

00:34:04.720 but the

00:34:06.040 most

00:34:06.240 likely

00:34:07.160 explanation

00:34:07.900 is there

00:34:09.160 something

00:34:09.520 about the

00:34:10.300 vulnerable

00:34:10.940 people

00:34:11.480 that's

00:34:12.040 different

00:34:12.360 that's

00:34:13.520 the most

00:34:13.780 likely

00:34:14.100 explanation

00:34:14.720 it's not

00:34:15.840 the most

00:34:16.160 likely

00:34:16.500 explanation

00:34:17.020 that

00:34:17.220 vaccines

00:34:17.540 just think

00:34:19.280 about

00:34:19.500 what are

00:34:19.980 the odds

00:34:20.500 that science

00:34:22.440 created the

00:34:23.220 only known

00:34:23.960 chemical

00:34:24.420 that would

00:34:25.380 make you

00:34:25.760 more likely

00:34:26.340 to get

00:34:26.860 infected

00:34:27.520 with the

00:34:27.920 COVID

00:34:28.180 what are

00:34:29.800 the odds

00:34:30.060 of that

00:34:30.480 isn't that

00:34:32.500 a little

00:34:32.760 bit

00:34:33.100 I hate

00:34:33.940 to say

00:34:34.260 this

00:34:34.560 but

00:34:34.860 too

00:34:36.080 on the

00:34:36.420 nose

00:34:36.800 see what

00:34:39.020 I did

00:34:39.300 I found

00:34:39.700 another

00:34:39.980 reason to

00:34:40.400 cover that

00:34:40.740 little spot

00:34:41.220 on my

00:34:41.480 nose

00:34:41.800 isn't that

00:34:42.640 too

00:34:42.800 on the

00:34:43.440 nose

00:34:43.760 well

00:34:44.740 if you

00:34:45.120 were the

00:34:45.760 anti-vax

00:34:46.600 guy

00:34:46.940 so if

00:34:48.300 you're the

00:34:48.560 anti-vax

00:34:49.180 guy

00:34:49.360 that's

00:34:49.560 like

00:34:49.720 your

00:34:49.880 brand

00:34:50.360 you're

00:34:51.220 famous

00:34:51.520 for that

00:34:52.020 and suddenly

00:34:53.600 there's

00:34:53.900 data that

00:34:54.380 makes it

00:34:54.700 look like

00:34:55.120 not only

00:34:55.920 did the

00:34:56.240 vaccination

00:34:56.740 maybe not

00:34:57.440 work as

00:34:57.980 well as

00:34:58.380 people hoped

00:34:59.080 but my

00:35:00.000 god

00:35:00.400 it's

00:35:00.780 killing you

00:35:01.300 it's

00:35:01.740 actually

00:35:01.940 making you

00:35:02.400 get more

00:35:02.960 of it

00:35:03.280 isn't this

00:35:04.100 a little

00:35:04.260 too

00:35:04.400 on the

00:35:04.680 nose

00:35:04.960 right

00:35:08.400 now

00:35:10.240 how many

00:35:12.080 of you

00:35:12.340 would agree

00:35:12.780 with me

00:35:13.160 so far

00:35:13.680 that

00:35:14.940 whether

00:35:15.380 Alex

00:35:16.060 Berenson

00:35:16.480 is right

00:35:17.280 or wrong

00:35:17.780 about his

00:35:18.420 larger

00:35:18.860 thesis

00:35:19.440 that the

00:35:20.560 vaccinations

00:35:21.100 have

00:35:22.160 big

00:35:22.940 downsides

00:35:23.480 so whether

00:35:24.280 he's

00:35:24.500 right or

00:35:24.800 wrong

00:35:25.100 would you

00:35:25.920 agree

00:35:26.160 that the

00:35:26.520 analysis

00:35:26.980 is wrong

00:35:27.580 would you

00:35:29.000 agree

00:35:29.200 just that

00:35:29.600 the analysis

00:35:30.140 is wrong

00:35:30.680 on this

00:35:31.380 specific thing

00:35:32.140 and would you

00:35:33.740 agree that

00:35:34.080 the most

00:35:34.400 likely

00:35:34.860 is there's

00:35:35.760 a correlation

00:35:36.260 and there's

00:35:37.580 an obvious

00:35:37.960 reason why

00:35:38.520 there would

00:35:38.780 be a

00:35:39.020 correlation

00:35:39.360 now let's

00:35:40.940 see if this

00:35:41.300 pattern happens

00:35:41.960 again

00:35:42.260 by the way

00:35:43.560 the reason

00:35:44.040 that the

00:35:44.500 scientists

00:35:44.900 get the

00:35:46.160 climate change

00:35:47.240 projections

00:35:47.800 wrong

00:35:48.340 is that they

00:35:49.380 can't figure

00:35:50.580 in technological

00:35:52.680 advances

00:35:53.240 because you

00:35:54.420 can't you

00:35:54.920 can't predict

00:35:55.460 the unpredictable

00:35:56.160 so you don't

00:35:57.320 know if

00:35:57.620 tomorrow

00:35:57.980 there'll be

00:35:58.400 a you know

00:35:59.260 free energy

00:36:00.220 or fusion

00:36:00.940 or what

00:36:02.200 so it's

00:36:03.860 kind of nonsense

00:36:04.500 when you look

00:36:05.020 at the climate

00:36:05.440 models

00:36:05.840 all right

00:36:06.120 let's look

00:36:06.400 at another

00:36:06.680 one

00:36:07.080 again

00:36:08.340 let's call

00:36:08.820 this the

00:36:09.300 Dr. Robert

00:36:10.820 Malone

00:36:11.200 problem

00:36:11.740 again

00:36:12.100 the problem

00:36:12.800 is not

00:36:14.100 Dr. Malone

00:36:14.820 Dr. Malone

00:36:16.420 is a

00:36:16.900 patriot

00:36:17.460 and

00:36:18.960 positive

00:36:20.200 influence

00:36:20.840 on the

00:36:21.100 country

00:36:21.380 don't know

00:36:22.560 if he's

00:36:22.820 right or

00:36:23.140 wrong

00:36:23.380 there does

00:36:25.180 seem to be

00:36:25.620 lots of

00:36:26.260 suggestion

00:36:27.100 that he

00:36:28.260 was right

00:36:28.720 about

00:36:29.060 you know

00:36:29.520 some risks

00:36:30.120 that were

00:36:30.640 not fully

00:36:31.180 expressed

00:36:31.680 that definitely

00:36:32.960 seems to be

00:36:33.500 true

00:36:33.740 but whether

00:36:34.600 he's right

00:36:35.040 about everything

00:36:35.660 is a

00:36:36.080 different

00:36:36.480 question

00:36:36.920 all right

00:36:38.160 so I saw

00:36:38.720 he was

00:36:39.360 on Twitter

00:36:40.880 he showed

00:36:41.280 a graph

00:36:41.700 that showed

00:36:42.760 that there's

00:36:43.120 a huge spike

00:36:43.840 in the

00:36:44.340 excess deaths

00:36:45.300 that correlates

00:36:46.720 with when

00:36:47.360 the vaccinations

00:36:48.400 were available

00:36:49.240 so

00:36:50.980 and the

00:36:51.880 graph

00:36:52.300 can you see

00:36:52.720 this

00:36:52.880 the graph

00:36:53.300 looks like

00:36:53.700 this

00:36:53.980 it's like

00:36:54.780 people die

00:36:56.020 at about

00:36:56.280 the same rate

00:36:57.080 year after year

00:36:58.240 people die

00:36:58.800 at about

00:36:59.040 the same rate

00:36:59.620 uh oh

00:37:00.100 vaccinations

00:37:01.200 were rolled out

00:37:01.920 and death

00:37:02.500 just goes

00:37:02.940 through the roof

00:37:03.500 excess deaths

00:37:05.040 so that

00:37:06.360 would indicate

00:37:07.020 would it

00:37:08.180 not

00:37:08.540 that

00:37:10.020 when you

00:37:11.320 get vaxxed

00:37:12.100 it increases

00:37:12.840 the likelihood

00:37:13.540 you will die

00:37:14.400 compared to

00:37:15.580 getting COVID

00:37:16.060 because that's

00:37:18.100 that's what

00:37:18.640 Dr. Robert

00:37:19.660 Ballone

00:37:20.160 that's what

00:37:22.020 that's the way

00:37:22.580 he presents it

00:37:23.280 now

00:37:23.520 does he say

00:37:24.700 that directly

00:37:25.320 I don't think

00:37:26.700 so

00:37:27.000 I think he

00:37:28.480 I think the way

00:37:29.160 he said it was

00:37:29.800 it's the most

00:37:30.820 important data

00:37:31.960 on the pandemic

00:37:33.060 now if it's

00:37:34.580 the most

00:37:34.900 important data

00:37:35.580 you think

00:37:36.060 that therefore

00:37:36.820 it's telling

00:37:37.600 you something

00:37:38.160 very important

00:37:39.460 because it

00:37:41.180 wouldn't be

00:37:41.500 the most

00:37:41.840 important data

00:37:42.520 unless you

00:37:43.640 could do

00:37:43.960 something about

00:37:44.600 it or it

00:37:45.140 changed how

00:37:45.640 you think

00:37:46.000 now don't

00:37:46.760 you think

00:37:47.100 he's suggesting

00:37:47.740 that it's

00:37:49.480 the vaccinations

00:37:50.180 themselves

00:37:50.860 that are

00:37:51.900 killing people

00:37:52.520 is that

00:37:53.340 is that

00:37:53.820 your interpretation

00:37:54.420 of his view

00:37:55.180 you tell me

00:37:57.500 is that

00:37:58.700 is that

00:37:59.160 his interpretation

00:38:00.020 can you

00:38:03.820 think

00:38:04.160 there's a

00:38:05.360 little

00:38:05.480 disagreement

00:38:05.960 don't know

00:38:07.360 well why

00:38:08.320 else would

00:38:08.740 he

00:38:08.980 why else

00:38:09.900 would he

00:38:10.120 say that's

00:38:10.540 the most

00:38:10.940 important

00:38:11.400 data

00:38:11.780 unless he

00:38:13.020 thought there

00:38:13.360 was a

00:38:13.580 correlation

00:38:14.000 because you

00:38:15.300 know what

00:38:15.520 is not

00:38:16.060 important

00:38:16.480 data

00:38:16.800 by definition

00:38:18.040 a correlation

00:38:19.700 that you

00:38:20.200 don't think

00:38:20.780 is causation

00:38:21.580 would be

00:38:22.640 no importance

00:38:23.300 to anybody

00:38:23.860 right

00:38:24.960 so clearly

00:38:27.060 he doesn't

00:38:27.620 think it's

00:38:28.120 just a

00:38:28.520 correlation

00:38:29.060 because then

00:38:30.320 he would

00:38:30.540 say well

00:38:30.980 we don't

00:38:31.340 know if

00:38:31.620 that means

00:38:31.940 anything

00:38:32.200 he has

00:38:33.380 to think

00:38:33.780 it's a

00:38:34.160 causation

00:38:35.020 or he

00:38:35.520 would not

00:38:35.860 say it's

00:38:36.160 important

00:38:36.600 by definition

00:38:38.120 right

00:38:38.800 so

00:38:40.040 now

00:38:41.380 so what

00:38:42.660 is the

00:38:42.920 best way

00:38:43.320 to get

00:38:43.700 at excess

00:38:44.560 deaths

00:38:44.960 if you

00:38:46.260 were a

00:38:46.540 data analyst

00:38:47.200 and you

00:38:47.480 said I'm

00:38:47.860 trying to

00:38:48.180 figure out

00:38:48.640 if people

00:38:50.080 are dying

00:38:50.620 more from

00:38:51.400 the

00:38:51.580 vaccination

00:38:52.220 so-called

00:38:53.640 vaccination

00:38:54.420 or more

00:38:55.320 from the

00:38:55.640 COVID

00:38:55.880 itself

00:38:56.280 so

00:38:57.660 there's

00:38:58.700 another

00:38:58.940 study

00:38:59.300 in the

00:38:59.780 Journal of

00:39:00.860 American

00:39:01.200 Metal

00:39:01.520 Association

00:39:02.100 November

00:39:03.020 of this

00:39:03.360 year

00:39:03.500 I think

00:39:03.820 and

00:39:04.880 it

00:39:05.340 studied

00:39:05.680 vaccinated

00:39:06.180 counties

00:39:06.840 versus

00:39:07.280 unvaccinated

00:39:08.140 vaccinated

00:39:09.900 versus

00:39:10.400 unvaccinated

00:39:11.140 and when

00:39:11.980 you do

00:39:12.200 it at

00:39:12.400 the

00:39:12.560 county

00:39:12.860 level

00:39:13.240 you have

00:39:14.200 the

00:39:14.380 opportunity

00:39:14.840 to pick

00:39:15.260 counties

00:39:15.720 that are

00:39:15.960 kind of

00:39:16.320 similar

00:39:16.740 like similar

00:39:18.020 demographics

00:39:18.660 and stuff

00:39:19.200 and the

00:39:19.960 only difference

00:39:20.720 is whether

00:39:21.580 they were

00:39:22.760 highly vaccinated

00:39:23.580 or not

00:39:23.980 now if

00:39:24.980 you do

00:39:25.200 this

00:39:25.440 analysis

00:39:25.880 the

00:39:26.760 vaccinated

00:39:27.380 counties

00:39:27.920 do

00:39:28.280 substantially

00:39:29.020 better

00:39:29.480 in

00:39:30.600 survivability

00:39:31.880 than the

00:39:33.220 unvaccinated

00:39:33.920 counties

00:39:34.440 now

00:39:35.880 so

00:39:37.500 that's

00:39:38.060 so then

00:39:39.040 we're done

00:39:39.440 right

00:39:39.720 you got a

00:39:40.720 study

00:39:41.040 that shows

00:39:41.880 very clearly

00:39:42.560 that on

00:39:43.160 average

00:39:43.480 getting

00:39:43.740 vaccinated

00:39:44.320 is

00:39:45.000 correlated

00:39:46.240 with

00:39:46.560 survivability

00:39:47.320 and

00:39:48.360 pretty

00:39:48.760 strong

00:39:49.540 correlation

00:39:50.080 pretty big

00:39:50.940 correlation

00:39:51.320 and then

00:39:52.640 the

00:39:52.780 unvaccinated

00:39:53.380 counties

00:39:53.740 are doing

00:39:54.140 poorly

00:39:54.500 so

00:39:55.480 that's

00:39:55.760 all

00:39:55.880 you

00:39:55.980 need

00:39:56.100 to

00:39:56.220 know

00:39:56.380 right

00:39:56.620 what do

00:39:58.940 you say

00:39:59.240 is that

00:40:00.060 all you

00:40:00.280 need

00:40:00.440 to

00:40:00.540 know

00:40:00.740 yeah

00:40:02.760 both

00:40:03.240 of these

00:40:03.560 are

00:40:03.740 unreliable

00:40:04.420 for

00:40:05.100 different

00:40:05.420 reasons

00:40:05.860 would you

00:40:07.520 have

00:40:07.640 known

00:40:07.840 that

00:40:08.140 would

00:40:09.280 you

00:40:09.420 have

00:40:09.540 known

00:40:09.740 not

00:40:09.960 to

00:40:10.120 trust

00:40:10.400 either

00:40:10.720 of

00:40:10.900 these

00:40:11.180 how

00:40:12.240 many

00:40:12.380 of

00:40:12.500 you

00:40:12.600 knew

00:40:12.740 not

00:40:12.920 to

00:40:13.060 trust

00:40:13.280 either

00:40:13.460 of

00:40:13.580 them

00:40:13.980 and

00:40:14.360 the

00:40:14.480 reason

00:40:14.640 not

00:40:14.840 to

00:40:14.980 trust

00:40:15.200 them

00:40:15.340 is

00:40:15.540 all

00:40:16.220 of

00:40:16.380 our

00:40:16.540 data

00:40:16.840 about

00:40:17.180 the

00:40:17.320 pandemic

00:40:17.700 is

00:40:18.320 suspicious

00:40:18.860 because

00:40:20.240 there's

00:40:20.500 no

00:40:20.680 data

00:40:20.940 that

00:40:21.140 doesn't

00:40:21.360 have

00:40:21.500 a

00:40:21.640 huge

00:40:21.920 financial

00:40:22.420 interest

00:40:22.760 behind

00:40:23.100 it

00:40:23.360 anything

00:40:24.380 that

00:40:24.700 gets

00:40:24.880 even

00:40:25.160 close

00:40:25.780 vaccine

00:40:27.960 mandates

00:40:28.420 skew

00:40:28.700 your

00:40:28.840 oh

00:40:29.060 we'll

00:40:29.220 get

00:40:29.340 to

00:40:29.460 that

00:40:29.720 yeah

00:40:30.400 we'll

00:40:31.140 get

00:40:31.260 to

00:40:31.360 that

00:40:31.700 right

00:40:35.240 so

00:40:35.580 vaccine

00:40:35.920 mandates

00:40:36.400 the

00:40:36.780 mandate

00:40:37.040 itself

00:40:37.400 but

00:40:37.800 here's

00:40:38.020 the

00:40:38.120 other

00:40:38.280 thing

00:40:38.580 that

00:40:38.920 Dr.

00:40:41.080 Malone

00:40:41.560 I think

00:40:42.060 has not

00:40:42.540 included

00:40:42.980 when

00:40:44.220 the

00:40:44.400 vaccinations

00:40:44.980 rolled

00:40:45.680 out

00:40:46.080 and

00:40:47.280 the

00:40:47.640 experts

00:40:48.140 were

00:40:48.380 telling

00:40:48.660 you

00:40:48.900 oh

00:40:49.180 everything's

00:40:49.720 good

00:40:49.920 now

00:40:50.180 because

00:40:50.520 the

00:40:50.640 vaccinations

00:40:51.160 and

00:40:52.080 then

00:40:52.260 you

00:40:52.420 got

00:40:52.700 vaccinated

00:40:53.340 did

00:40:54.740 you

00:40:54.880 change

00:40:55.160 your

00:40:55.320 behavior

00:40:55.700 of

00:40:57.760 course

00:40:58.000 you

00:40:58.220 did

00:40:58.560 the

00:41:00.060 one

00:41:00.540 and

00:41:00.660 only

00:41:00.840 time

00:41:01.220 during

00:41:01.840 the

00:41:02.020 pandemic

00:41:02.400 I

00:41:03.100 was

00:41:03.300 around

00:41:03.700 a lot

00:41:04.100 of

00:41:04.220 people

00:41:04.440 in

00:41:04.600 a

00:41:04.700 closed

00:41:04.960 space

00:41:05.420 just

00:41:05.960 once

00:41:06.380 it

00:41:07.500 was

00:41:07.660 after

00:41:08.060 my

00:41:08.400 vaccinations

00:41:08.920 were

00:41:09.300 effective

00:41:09.740 allegedly

00:41:11.620 effective

00:41:12.180 only

00:41:13.380 once

00:41:13.820 the

00:41:14.320 one

00:41:14.580 time

00:41:14.820 I

00:41:14.980 could

00:41:15.280 have

00:41:15.420 gotten

00:41:15.660 COVID

00:41:16.000 I

00:41:16.720 mean

00:41:16.960 I

00:41:17.760 mean

00:41:17.860 I

00:41:17.980 suppose

00:41:18.240 I

00:41:18.400 could

00:41:18.580 have

00:41:18.660 gotten

00:41:18.820 it

00:41:18.940 any

00:41:19.080 time

00:41:19.260 but

00:41:19.660 the

00:41:19.780 one

00:41:19.940 time

00:41:20.140 I

00:41:20.260 was

00:41:20.380 at

00:41:20.540 high

00:41:20.940 risk

00:41:21.360 to

00:41:21.960 catch

00:41:22.280 it

00:41:22.520 was

00:41:23.300 because

00:41:23.600 I

00:41:23.960 had

00:41:24.120 mistakenly

00:41:24.780 thought

00:41:25.100 that

00:41:25.860 my

00:41:26.060 risk

00:41:26.400 was

00:41:26.640 now

00:41:26.940 basically

00:41:27.460 down

00:41:27.740 to

00:41:27.900 zero

00:41:28.240 because

00:41:29.040 I

00:41:29.140 had

00:41:29.240 been

00:41:29.340 vaccinated

00:41:29.780 you

00:41:30.960 don't

00:41:31.260 think

00:41:31.460 everybody

00:41:31.800 acted

00:41:32.120 the

00:41:32.340 same

00:41:32.500 way

00:41:32.720 so

00:41:34.420 the

00:41:34.760 problem

00:41:35.020 with

00:41:35.280 the

00:41:35.480 everybody

00:41:35.880 dying

00:41:36.360 when

00:41:36.560 the

00:41:36.680 vaccination

00:41:37.180 rolled

00:41:37.580 out

00:41:37.840 is

00:41:38.300 that

00:41:38.460 that's

00:41:38.700 when

00:41:38.840 everybody

00:41:39.180 went

00:41:39.380 outside

00:41:39.860 like

00:41:46.000 everybody

00:41:46.240 acted

00:41:46.540 the

00:41:46.740 same

00:41:47.020 as

00:41:47.600 soon

00:41:47.760 as

00:41:47.880 you

00:41:47.980 thought

00:41:48.160 you

00:41:48.260 were

00:41:48.360 safe

00:41:48.620 you

00:41:48.780 acted

00:41:49.020 differently

00:41:49.400 than

00:41:49.640 when

00:41:49.780 you

00:41:49.900 thought

00:41:50.080 you

00:41:50.180 were

00:41:50.260 less

00:41:50.480 safe

00:41:50.760 now

00:41:51.740 can

00:41:54.060 I

00:41:54.660 tell

00:41:54.920 you

00:41:55.080 that

00:41:55.260 that's

00:41:55.620 the

00:41:55.800 reason

00:41:56.200 it

00:41:58.980 looks

00:41:59.180 like

00:41:59.380 this

00:41:59.700 no

00:42:00.540 I'm

00:42:01.740 telling

00:42:01.940 you

00:42:02.140 it's

00:42:02.360 a

00:42:02.480 more

00:42:02.660 obvious

00:42:03.160 explanation

00:42:03.860 than

00:42:05.580 something

00:42:06.320 else

00:42:06.700 right

00:42:07.460 I'm

00:42:08.040 just

00:42:08.180 saying

00:42:08.380 that

00:42:08.620 if

00:42:09.140 somebody

00:42:09.540 presents

00:42:10.520 data

00:42:11.040 and

00:42:11.820 they

00:42:12.040 don't

00:42:12.900 even

00:42:13.420 mention

00:42:13.920 the

00:42:14.800 most

00:42:15.160 obvious

00:42:15.620 reason

00:42:16.100 for

00:42:16.380 it

00:42:16.600 instead

00:42:17.680 they

00:42:17.900 go

00:42:18.040 for

00:42:18.200 the

00:42:18.420 second

00:42:18.880 or

00:42:19.160 third

00:42:19.560 most

00:42:19.900 likely

00:42:20.320 reason

00:42:20.660 that's

00:42:21.560 somebody

00:42:21.800 you

00:42:21.960 shouldn't

00:42:22.220 trust

00:42:22.620 now

00:42:24.460 am I

00:42:25.280 telling

00:42:25.480 you

00:42:25.680 you

00:42:25.840 shouldn't

00:42:26.120 trust

00:42:26.460 a

00:42:26.860 doctor

00:42:27.200 about

00:42:28.120 the

00:42:28.320 pandemic

00:42:28.740 yes

00:42:30.360 yes

00:42:31.420 you

00:42:32.380 shouldn't

00:42:32.600 trust

00:42:32.820 any

00:42:33.020 doctor

00:42:33.460 about

00:42:34.640 the

00:42:34.840 pandemic

00:42:35.260 they

00:42:36.120 don't

00:42:36.460 have

00:42:36.660 a

00:42:36.780 class

00:42:37.260 on

00:42:37.860 analyzing

00:42:38.300 data

00:42:38.700 they

00:42:39.860 don't

00:42:40.300 who

00:42:41.140 would

00:42:41.280 you

00:42:41.400 trust

00:42:41.720 on

00:42:42.040 this

00:42:42.320 Dr.

00:42:42.880 Malone

00:42:43.220 the

00:42:43.540 expert

00:42:44.020 on

00:42:44.400 all

00:42:44.600 things

00:42:44.960 directly

00:42:46.460 related

00:42:46.960 to

00:42:47.140 mRNA

00:42:47.620 or

00:42:49.220 the

00:42:49.400 person

00:42:49.680 who

00:42:49.860 knows

00:42:50.080 what

00:42:50.280 bullshit

00:42:50.620 looks

00:42:50.920 like

00:42:51.220 the

00:42:53.300 answer

00:42:53.540 is

00:42:53.700 you

00:42:53.820 shouldn't

00:42:54.080 trust

00:42:54.320 either

00:42:54.560 of

00:42:54.720 us

00:42:54.960 right

00:42:55.720 if

00:42:56.500 you're

00:42:56.680 trusting

00:42:56.980 me

00:42:57.460 that's

00:42:58.580 also

00:42:59.020 a

00:42:59.280 mistake

00:42:59.740 the

00:43:00.900 only

00:43:01.140 thing

00:43:01.340 I'm

00:43:01.520 trying

00:43:01.680 to

00:43:01.840 teach

00:43:02.100 you

00:43:02.320 is

00:43:03.080 what

00:43:03.860 pitfalls

00:43:04.460 in

00:43:04.680 analysis

00:43:05.200 I'm

00:43:06.000 not

00:43:06.140 telling

00:43:06.340 you

00:43:06.440 what

00:43:06.540 the

00:43:06.680 answer

00:43:06.920 is

00:43:07.180 how

00:43:07.660 the

00:43:07.780 hell

00:43:07.920 would

00:43:08.080 I

00:43:08.180 know

00:43:08.400 I

00:43:09.860 don't

00:43:10.040 know

00:43:10.260 I

00:43:10.980 really

00:43:11.240 don't

00:43:11.700 I

00:43:12.160 genuinely

00:43:12.820 genuinely

00:43:13.700 don't

00:43:14.620 know

00:43:14.900 if

00:43:16.060 everybody

00:43:17.120 or some

00:43:17.740 groups

00:43:18.100 were better

00:43:18.540 off with

00:43:18.940 the

00:43:19.040 vaccination

00:43:19.560 so-called

00:43:20.620 vaccination

00:43:21.500 I don't

00:43:22.060 know

00:43:22.280 and if

00:43:23.200 you think

00:43:23.540 you know

00:43:24.020 then I

00:43:24.960 would question

00:43:25.460 how you

00:43:25.840 know that

00:43:26.340 because I'm

00:43:27.080 not seeing

00:43:27.440 anything

00:43:27.720 credible

00:43:28.180 I'm seeing

00:43:29.040 lots of

00:43:29.500 data

00:43:29.800 seeing lots

00:43:31.180 of experts

00:43:31.820 seeing lots

00:43:33.260 of anecdotes

00:43:34.040 but nothing

00:43:35.440 I would

00:43:36.040 trust

00:43:36.420 so if

00:43:38.140 you do

00:43:38.480 trust any

00:43:39.260 of that

00:43:39.700 I would

00:43:40.680 say that's

00:43:41.140 an

00:43:41.340 analytical

00:43:41.820 mistake

00:43:43.280 you could

00:43:44.960 certainly

00:43:45.260 be leaning

00:43:46.200 heavily in

00:43:46.820 one direction

00:43:47.420 that would

00:43:48.240 you know

00:43:48.860 that's

00:43:49.040 normal

00:43:49.360 that makes

00:43:49.860 sense

00:43:50.100 but if

00:43:50.800 you're like

00:43:51.100 certain

00:43:51.500 you're

00:43:52.340 locked

00:43:52.660 in

00:43:52.940 that the

00:43:53.800 vaccinations

00:43:54.280 definitely

00:43:54.920 were better

00:43:55.380 than no

00:43:55.760 vaccinations

00:43:56.300 or

00:43:56.740 they're

00:43:57.520 definitely

00:43:57.980 you know

00:43:58.440 either

00:43:58.840 side

00:43:59.180 if

00:44:00.140 you're

00:44:00.380 sure

00:44:00.700 about

00:44:01.000 it

00:44:01.240 that's

00:44:02.560 the only

00:44:03.060 unreasonable

00:44:04.720 position

00:44:05.980 the only

00:44:07.340 reasonable

00:44:07.820 position

00:44:08.300 is

00:44:08.620 I'm not

00:44:09.360 sure

00:44:09.660 but I'm

00:44:10.600 leaning

00:44:10.920 one way

00:44:11.360 or another

00:44:11.660 that's

00:44:11.960 fine

00:44:12.180 leaning

00:44:12.640 is okay

00:44:13.040 please

00:44:15.220 stop with

00:44:15.680 COVID talk

00:44:16.240 this is

00:44:16.640 not

00:44:16.820 COVID talk

00:44:17.460 if you

00:44:18.880 believe

00:44:19.140 this was

00:44:19.500 about

00:44:19.740 COVID

00:44:20.060 you have

00:44:20.940 missed

00:44:21.180 the thread

00:44:21.860 this is

00:44:23.060 about

00:44:23.360 any

00:44:24.140 kind

00:44:24.440 of

00:44:24.580 expert

00:44:25.020 talking

00:44:26.180 about

00:44:26.460 any

00:44:26.780 kind

00:44:27.040 of

00:44:27.160 data

00:44:27.440 if

00:44:28.620 you

00:44:28.980 get

00:44:29.220 that

00:44:29.580 you'll

00:44:29.840 be

00:44:29.940 the

00:44:30.120 smartest

00:44:30.400 people

00:44:30.860 watching

00:44:31.760 the

00:44:32.000 news

00:44:32.300 right

00:44:33.400 so now

00:44:34.100 you see

00:44:34.400 the

00:44:34.540 pattern

00:44:34.880 if

00:44:36.900 it's

00:44:37.080 a

00:44:37.260 scientist

00:44:37.640 showing

00:44:38.300 you

00:44:38.520 data

00:44:38.860 they're

00:44:39.860 outside

00:44:40.180 their

00:44:40.460 field

00:44:40.700 of

00:44:40.840 expertise

00:44:41.260 if

00:44:42.860 it's

00:44:43.240 a

00:44:43.660 doctor

00:44:44.040 showing

00:44:44.460 you

00:44:44.660 data

00:44:44.980 they're

00:44:46.140 outside

00:44:46.520 their

00:44:46.820 area

00:44:47.020 of

00:44:47.160 expertise

00:44:47.620 if

00:44:48.880 it's

00:44:49.100 a

00:44:49.280 journalist

00:44:49.780 showing

00:44:50.780 you

00:44:51.000 data

00:44:51.360 they're

00:44:52.180 outside

00:44:52.560 their

00:44:52.800 area

00:44:53.060 of

00:44:53.220 expertise

00:44:53.680 and

00:44:54.680 every

00:44:54.940 time

00:44:55.160 you

00:44:55.300 think

00:44:55.560 that

00:44:55.840 you're

00:44:56.280 seeing

00:44:56.540 expertise

00:44:57.060 you're

00:44:58.480 wrong

00:44:58.740 you're

00:44:59.840 seeing

00:44:59.980 the

00:45:00.120 opposite

00:45:00.400 so

00:45:02.840 who is

00:45:03.180 credible

00:45:03.540 the

00:45:03.760 answer

00:45:03.980 is

00:45:04.100 nobody

00:45:04.460 in the

00:45:04.860 pandemic

00:45:05.240 in the

00:45:06.400 pandemic

00:45:06.800 you should

00:45:07.340 trust

00:45:07.640 exactly

00:45:08.360 nobody

00:45:08.820 there's

00:45:09.340 just

00:45:09.480 too

00:45:09.660 much

00:45:09.820 money

00:45:10.060 sloshing

00:45:10.500 around

00:45:10.860 and

00:45:11.520 people

00:45:12.280 are so

00:45:12.640 locked

00:45:12.960 into

00:45:13.220 their

00:45:13.540 prior

00:45:14.220 opinions

00:45:14.800 that it

00:45:15.680 would be

00:45:15.980 like a

00:45:16.320 big

00:45:16.460 reputational

00:45:17.280 hit

00:45:17.660 let me

00:45:19.140 take

00:45:19.640 an example

00:45:20.560 let's

00:45:23.160 take

00:45:23.340 Zuby

00:45:23.800 most of

00:45:24.900 you know

00:45:25.120 Zuby

00:45:25.580 Twitter

00:45:27.080 internet

00:45:27.960 rapper

00:45:29.580 and also

00:45:30.440 I'd say

00:45:31.640 public

00:45:32.320 philosopher

00:45:32.920 great

00:45:34.140 guy

00:45:34.520 probably

00:45:36.360 one of

00:45:36.860 the most

00:45:37.120 appreciated

00:45:39.500 and liked

00:45:40.080 personalities

00:45:40.720 on the

00:45:41.040 internet

00:45:41.260 very popular

00:45:41.840 now

00:45:43.020 Zuby

00:45:43.300 has a

00:45:43.580 very

00:45:43.840 clear

00:45:44.440 take

00:45:44.820 on

00:45:45.320 the

00:45:46.440 vaccines

00:45:48.060 and whether

00:45:48.780 they are

00:45:49.100 good or

00:45:49.440 bad

00:45:49.640 right

00:45:49.880 it doesn't

00:45:50.420 matter

00:45:50.580 what his

00:45:50.860 opinion

00:45:51.060 is

00:45:51.320 but

00:45:51.960 what if

00:45:52.360 take

00:45:53.020 somebody

00:45:53.340 who's a

00:45:53.600 public

00:45:53.840 figure

00:45:54.180 like that

00:45:54.580 and really

00:45:54.960 has

00:45:55.240 a brand

00:45:56.600 connection

00:45:57.700 to an

00:45:58.180 opinion

00:45:58.480 that really

00:45:59.280 mattered to

00:45:59.780 the world

00:46:00.200 could they

00:46:01.620 ever change

00:46:02.080 their mind

00:46:02.520 and again

00:46:05.100 I'm not

00:46:05.480 picking on

00:46:05.980 Zuby

00:46:06.260 because he's

00:46:06.700 a plus

00:46:07.720 to the

00:46:08.020 world

00:46:08.280 in every

00:46:08.720 way

00:46:08.980 but

00:46:09.560 anybody

00:46:10.220 could be

00:46:10.640 wrong

00:46:10.900 what if

00:46:11.340 he's

00:46:11.460 wrong

00:46:11.760 or what

00:46:13.320 if I'm

00:46:13.620 wrong

00:46:13.880 now I'm

00:46:15.240 the only

00:46:15.500 one who

00:46:15.880 can't

00:46:16.420 exactly

00:46:16.900 be wrong

00:46:17.520 because

00:46:19.700 I'm telling

00:46:20.340 you the

00:46:20.660 data doesn't

00:46:21.340 support any

00:46:22.100 opinion

00:46:22.440 so if

00:46:24.240 it turns

00:46:24.540 out that

00:46:25.480 later we

00:46:26.200 find out

00:46:26.640 somehow

00:46:27.020 that for

00:46:28.020 sure it

00:46:28.580 was one

00:46:28.920 way or

00:46:29.220 the other

00:46:29.540 will I

00:46:30.900 have to

00:46:31.220 will I

00:46:31.560 have to

00:46:31.800 correct

00:46:32.040 anything

00:46:32.420 I said

00:46:32.860 nope

00:46:34.960 I won't

00:46:36.040 have to

00:46:36.280 correct

00:46:36.520 anything

00:46:36.900 I've

00:46:37.180 ever

00:46:37.340 said

00:46:37.640 I have

00:46:38.620 nothing

00:46:38.940 to

00:46:39.200 correct

00:46:39.540 no matter

00:46:40.000 what we

00:46:40.440 learn in

00:46:40.840 the future

00:46:41.200 but Zuby

00:46:42.020 does

00:46:42.380 Zuby

00:46:43.640 does

00:46:43.960 if it

00:46:45.100 turned

00:46:45.300 down

00:46:45.580 and I'm

00:46:45.920 not saying

00:46:46.260 he's

00:46:46.440 wrong

00:46:46.720 he could

00:46:47.500 be right

00:46:47.820 about

00:46:48.000 everything

00:46:48.340 he's a

00:46:48.800 smart

00:46:49.020 guy

00:46:49.280 right

00:46:49.520 he's

00:46:50.180 smart

00:46:50.500 he pays

00:46:50.920 attention

00:46:51.340 doesn't

00:46:52.200 seem to

00:46:52.600 fall for

00:46:53.000 cognitive

00:46:53.420 dissonance

00:46:54.020 I don't

00:46:54.540 really see

00:46:54.920 that

00:46:55.080 happening

00:46:55.380 so he

00:46:56.760 could be

00:46:57.080 totally

00:46:57.420 right

00:46:57.780 but not

00:46:58.960 because of

00:46:59.360 the data

00:46:59.700 because a

00:47:01.780 rapper is

00:47:02.240 not who

00:47:02.660 you want

00:47:02.920 to look

00:47:03.100 to for

00:47:03.440 the data

00:47:03.840 not a

00:47:05.360 doctor

00:47:05.680 not a

00:47:06.120 scientist

00:47:06.580 not a

00:47:07.500 journalist

00:47:07.920 not a

00:47:08.880 rapper

00:47:09.120 so every

00:47:11.540 time you

00:47:11.980 see somebody

00:47:12.560 you think

00:47:12.940 is an

00:47:13.260 expert

00:47:13.540 but they're

00:47:14.600 talking

00:47:14.920 through the

00:47:15.380 data

00:47:15.680 remember

00:47:16.920 you're not

00:47:17.320 hearing

00:47:17.560 expertise

00:47:18.020 you're hearing

00:47:19.880 somebody in

00:47:20.500 the wrong

00:47:20.840 field

00:47:21.320 talking to

00:47:23.620 you

00:47:24.960 now I'm

00:47:28.080 very interested

00:47:28.880 in hauling

00:47:29.600 here

00:47:29.900 who I

00:47:30.940 always have

00:47:31.280 to hide

00:47:31.580 every day

00:47:32.080 because it's

00:47:34.680 always like

00:47:35.380 the most

00:47:35.720 troll like

00:47:36.340 content

00:47:38.200 and I always

00:47:39.060 wonder if the

00:47:39.640 only thing is to

00:47:40.480 try to get me to

00:47:41.120 react it has

00:47:41.980 nothing to do

00:47:42.520 with the

00:47:42.720 content

00:47:43.040 MRAs

00:47:45.020 targeted

00:47:45.880 all right

00:47:47.700 that was $20

00:47:48.320 you really

00:47:49.020 wasted

00:47:49.420 all right

00:47:50.180 don't spend

00:47:51.220 $20 to give

00:47:52.260 me your opinion

00:47:52.820 of whether the

00:47:53.700 vaccination worked

00:47:54.620 or not

00:47:55.020 that would be

00:47:55.900 the worst

00:47:56.360 money you've

00:47:56.880 ever spent

00:47:57.520 like do you

00:48:00.460 think that

00:48:00.800 you're $20

00:48:01.260 I'm sorry

00:48:01.780 I don't mean

00:48:02.160 to mock you

00:48:02.740 but I think

00:48:04.420 you would be

00:48:04.760 missing the

00:48:05.220 whole plot

00:48:05.860 if you think

00:48:07.020 that anybody's

00:48:07.740 mind could be

00:48:08.340 changed with

00:48:09.160 a one sentence

00:48:10.820 about why

00:48:12.340 something has

00:48:12.900 risks

00:48:13.300 all right

00:48:16.360 and that

00:48:19.660 ladies and

00:48:20.140 gentlemen

00:48:20.420 is what I

00:48:22.820 wanted to tell

00:48:23.280 you

00:48:23.460 now did

00:48:26.480 I deliver

00:48:26.980 on my

00:48:27.400 promise

00:48:27.820 that I

00:48:28.400 explained to

00:48:29.000 you why

00:48:29.460 we can't

00:48:30.020 agree on

00:48:30.480 everything

00:48:30.820 the reason

00:48:31.800 we can't

00:48:32.260 agree is

00:48:33.380 that we

00:48:34.160 keep thinking

00:48:35.260 that the

00:48:35.740 people showing

00:48:36.400 us the

00:48:36.840 data know

00:48:37.360 what they're

00:48:37.620 talking about

00:48:38.220 but nobody

00:48:39.380 can analyze

00:48:39.940 data and

00:48:40.460 it's all

00:48:40.740 bad

00:48:41.100 so literally

00:48:42.620 it doesn't

00:48:43.100 matter who's

00:48:43.620 talking it's

00:48:44.640 all garbage

00:48:45.480 all garbage

00:48:47.080 right

00:48:47.720 the only people

00:48:49.020 who are right

00:48:49.540 are the ones

00:48:50.000 who don't

00:48:50.360 know

00:48:50.660 everybody else

00:48:52.840 is guessing

00:48:54.320 and trying

00:48:54.920 to tell

00:48:55.280 you that

00:48:55.600 they were

00:48:55.860 right all

00:48:56.300 along

00:48:56.700 and that

00:48:57.980 all right

00:49:00.200 here's a

00:49:06.220 comment not

00:49:06.740 garbage if

00:49:07.400 you get the

00:49:07.740 vaccine you

00:49:08.300 still get

00:49:08.700 covid now

00:49:10.120 is there

00:49:11.440 somebody here

00:49:12.060 who doesn't

00:49:12.700 know the

00:49:13.040 argument and

00:49:14.340 again I'm not

00:49:14.920 saying it's

00:49:15.240 true but

00:49:16.340 have you never

00:49:16.900 heard the

00:49:17.660 argument that

00:49:19.160 the vaccine is

00:49:19.940 supposed to

00:49:20.340 protect you in

00:49:21.600 terms of how

00:49:21.980 sick you get

00:49:22.540 all right now

00:49:23.940 I'm not saying

00:49:24.280 you believe it

00:49:25.000 well have you

00:49:26.180 never heard the

00:49:27.220 argument I'm

00:49:29.320 actually curious

00:49:30.100 seriously have

00:49:32.040 you never heard

00:49:32.720 that argument I'm

00:49:34.320 not backing the

00:49:35.040 argument I'm just

00:49:36.100 asking you have

00:49:36.580 you never heard

00:49:37.420 that it's supposed

00:49:37.960 to keep you

00:49:38.380 healthier no way

00:49:40.620 to know for sure

00:49:41.260 okay again that's

00:49:43.180 the right answer

00:49:43.720 but if you haven't

00:49:44.960 heard the argument

00:49:45.860 then I really worry

00:49:46.880 about your opinion

00:49:47.560 how could you not

00:49:48.280 have heard the

00:49:48.720 argument

00:49:49.020 yeah if you're

00:49:53.280 still talking about

00:49:54.120 whether the shot

00:49:55.120 keeps you from

00:49:56.640 spreading it

00:49:57.400 nobody's on that

00:49:59.600 topic like we've

00:50:01.300 all moved on

00:50:01.860 that's stipulated

00:50:02.660 we all know that

00:50:03.680 it's not going to

00:50:04.140 stop spread

00:50:04.660 there's nobody on

00:50:05.840 the other side of

00:50:06.420 that no point

00:50:07.740 of even bringing

00:50:08.300 it up

00:50:08.640 all right

00:50:11.180 so it blew your

00:50:18.580 mind when I did

00:50:19.320 the whiteboard

00:50:20.020 and the two

00:50:20.420 movies you meet

00:50:21.020 today or

00:50:22.020 otherwise

00:50:23.100 all right

00:50:25.860 does it did

00:50:27.660 anybody have an

00:50:28.620 aha moment

00:50:29.440 I have to check

00:50:30.520 my work here

00:50:31.180 did anybody have

00:50:32.620 an aha moment

00:50:33.380 when I showed you

00:50:34.180 that all of these

00:50:34.840 situations are the

00:50:35.700 same

00:50:35.980 now is it

00:50:43.540 because you

00:50:43.940 were already

00:50:44.300 aware of it

00:50:45.360 it's because

00:50:50.580 locals are

00:50:51.840 they were already

00:50:52.400 aware of it

00:50:52.980 that makes

00:50:54.300 sense

00:50:54.580 and then over

00:50:56.120 on YouTube

00:50:57.840 a little bit

00:50:58.740 different reaction

00:50:59.600 which actually

00:51:00.800 that tracks

00:51:01.660 because I don't

00:51:02.980 know if the

00:51:03.440 YouTube viewers

00:51:04.100 you don't know

00:51:04.620 but since this

00:51:05.320 is more general

00:51:06.040 audience

00:51:06.520 and the locals

00:51:08.260 audience are

00:51:08.960 people who have

00:51:09.480 really paid

00:51:10.240 attention to me

00:51:10.960 longer

00:51:11.320 they do have

00:51:13.060 different opinions

00:51:13.760 there's a big

00:51:15.200 difference between

00:51:15.980 the people who have

00:51:16.880 followed me a long

00:51:17.680 time

00:51:17.960 yeah

00:51:20.220 it's one thing

00:51:24.760 to be aware of

00:51:25.640 it but when you

00:51:26.820 see it in context

00:51:27.840 and I show you

00:51:28.600 the pattern where

00:51:29.400 it's always the

00:51:29.960 case

00:51:30.260 that didn't

00:51:31.160 change how you

00:51:32.180 saw it

00:51:32.620 because I too

00:51:34.560 was aware of

00:51:35.360 it all

00:51:35.740 but until I

00:51:37.540 put it all

00:51:38.080 together

00:51:38.400 I couldn't see

00:51:39.540 how we always

00:51:40.260 have two movies

00:51:41.140 see it explains

00:51:42.440 how we could

00:51:42.900 have two movies

00:51:43.600 and it's entirely

00:51:45.000 about our

00:51:45.700 ability to

00:51:46.640 whether we're

00:51:49.160 sophisticated

00:51:49.920 in trusting

00:51:50.940 data or not

00:51:51.820 so your level

00:51:53.780 of data

00:51:54.400 sophistication

00:51:56.140 really makes

00:51:56.640 a difference

00:51:57.020 here

00:51:57.380 lockdowns

00:52:01.680 were awful

00:52:02.120 we all

00:52:02.720 agree

00:52:03.020 somebody on

00:52:08.180 YouTube says

00:52:08.940 that they don't

00:52:09.500 drink the

00:52:09.880 Kool-Aid

00:52:10.280 yeah you do

00:52:11.220 the YouTube

00:52:13.600 people think

00:52:14.260 they're the ones

00:52:14.920 who don't drink

00:52:15.420 the Kool-Aid

00:52:15.820 you know who

00:52:16.620 is the most

00:52:17.080 hypnotized

00:52:17.780 is the ones

00:52:18.840 who think

00:52:19.180 they weren't

00:52:19.540 drinking any

00:52:20.100 Kool-Aid

00:52:20.560 like if you

00:52:22.220 think that only

00:52:22.940 the other people

00:52:23.540 are drinking

00:52:23.960 the Kool-Aid

00:52:24.560 you're the most

00:52:25.820 lost

00:52:26.380 you could not

00:52:27.760 be more lost

00:52:28.720 than thinking

00:52:29.740 it's the other

00:52:30.420 people drinking

00:52:31.060 the Kool-Aid

00:52:31.680 if you're in

00:52:33.360 that little world

00:52:34.120 I feel so

00:52:36.020 sorry for you

00:52:37.180 Lisa says

00:52:40.720 I pander to

00:52:41.440 my paying

00:52:42.160 crowd on

00:52:42.760 locals

00:52:43.140 that's literally

00:52:45.120 the business

00:52:45.680 model

00:52:46.060 that literally

00:52:47.900 is a description

00:52:48.920 of what that

00:52:50.360 is

00:52:50.700 it's a special

00:52:52.380 group of people

00:52:53.120 who pay extra

00:52:54.180 to be pandered

00:52:55.320 to by me

00:52:56.020 so

00:52:56.920 good analysis

00:52:58.000 I guess

00:53:00.080 I'm grifting

00:53:01.100 watch me grift

00:53:02.880 by charging people

00:53:03.820 for exactly

00:53:04.420 what they know

00:53:04.920 they're getting

00:53:05.300 with my big grift

00:53:06.900 do you think

00:53:10.020 the locals

00:53:10.480 people don't know

00:53:11.160 exactly what

00:53:11.860 they're buying

00:53:12.280 at this point

00:53:13.880 they know

00:53:14.940 exactly what

00:53:15.540 they're getting

00:53:15.900 the people

00:53:18.180 who do

00:53:18.820 the grift

00:53:19.740 thing

00:53:20.680 like everybody

00:53:21.820 who has an opinion

00:53:22.500 is a grifter

00:53:23.160 these days

00:53:23.800 on twitter

00:53:24.360 ah you grifter

00:53:25.640 Tony says

00:53:29.260 in all caps

00:53:29.980 are you drinking

00:53:31.180 the kool-aid

00:53:31.980 scott

00:53:32.500 Tony

00:53:34.480 I don't know

00:53:36.460 you

00:53:36.820 but

00:53:38.760 I've formed

00:53:40.280 a number of

00:53:40.800 opinions about

00:53:41.440 you from

00:53:41.820 your one

00:53:42.340 comment

00:53:42.860 they're not

00:53:44.600 positive

00:53:45.120 all right

00:53:49.080 was there any

00:53:50.300 so I didn't talk

00:53:51.760 about the

00:53:52.500 omnibus bill

00:53:54.880 because everything

00:53:55.780 you say about it

00:53:56.500 is the same thing

00:53:57.120 everybody says

00:53:57.820 do you want to do

00:53:58.780 the omnibus bill

00:53:59.800 uh the bill

00:54:02.200 the bill is this

00:54:02.780 high

00:54:03.300 uh congress

00:54:04.900 certainly did not

00:54:06.180 read all the

00:54:07.180 pages of the

00:54:08.240 bill

00:54:08.600 it will cause

00:54:10.020 inflation

00:54:10.720 it's a

00:54:11.940 uniparty

00:54:12.940 I don't

00:54:15.260 I don't like

00:54:16.760 congress

00:54:17.360 there's nothing

00:54:19.060 you can say

00:54:19.680 about it

00:54:20.100 is there

00:54:20.460 nothing you can

00:54:22.080 say about it

00:54:22.700 it's just all

00:54:23.620 been said

00:54:24.240 there's nothing

00:54:25.500 to add

00:54:25.940 and you know

00:54:27.360 what it's going

00:54:27.660 to look like

00:54:28.040 the next time

00:54:28.620 they do a

00:54:29.040 unibus

00:54:29.520 let me predict

00:54:30.960 the future

00:54:31.460 the next

00:54:32.720 unibus

00:54:33.440 it's going to

00:54:34.700 be this tall

00:54:35.580 Rand Paul

00:54:36.820 will pose

00:54:37.580 standing in front

00:54:38.420 of the pile

00:54:39.060 he will suggest

00:54:40.320 that most people

00:54:41.020 aren't going to

00:54:41.480 read it

00:54:42.020 people will

00:54:42.900 complain about

00:54:43.720 why we can't

00:54:44.800 have the veto

00:54:45.440 on line item

00:54:46.400 even though

00:54:46.840 it's obvious

00:54:47.320 why

00:54:47.720 because

00:54:48.560 you can't

00:54:49.240 get an

00:54:49.560 agreement

00:54:49.880 without it

00:54:50.580 if you had

00:54:52.080 the line item

00:54:53.080 veto

00:54:53.320 you couldn't

00:54:54.040 negotiate

00:54:54.520 by the way

00:54:55.380 you all know

00:54:55.800 that right

00:54:56.180 do you all

00:54:57.260 know why

00:54:57.720 the line item

00:54:58.520 veto will

00:54:59.120 never happen

00:54:59.700 in Congress

00:55:00.560 like the

00:55:02.400 president

00:55:02.700 will never

00:55:03.100 get that

00:55:03.540 there's a

00:55:04.660 good reason

00:55:05.320 it's not

00:55:06.400 a bad reason

00:55:06.980 the good

00:55:08.200 reason is

00:55:08.700 the only way

00:55:09.140 you can get

00:55:09.580 enough people

00:55:10.060 on one side

00:55:10.720 of a vote

00:55:11.320 is some of

00:55:12.440 them have

00:55:12.700 to be

00:55:12.980 bribed

00:55:13.480 and they're

00:55:14.500 bribed

00:55:14.860 with these

00:55:15.180 little pork

00:55:15.720 things like

00:55:16.260 alright

00:55:17.000 I know

00:55:17.420 you hate

00:55:17.760 this bill

00:55:18.280 and people

00:55:19.080 in your state

00:55:19.620 will be

00:55:19.980 mad at you

00:55:20.480 but if we

00:55:21.520 built

00:55:21.920 like a

00:55:23.900 military base

00:55:25.120 in your state

00:55:25.740 maybe they'd

00:55:27.740 let you be

00:55:28.420 okay with

00:55:28.960 this vote

00:55:29.600 so if you

00:55:30.960 take out

00:55:31.360 the

00:55:31.620 if you have

00:55:32.220 the line

00:55:32.600 item veto

00:55:33.060 you don't

00:55:33.480 get anything

00:55:33.940 done

00:55:34.260 so that's

00:55:35.600 the trade-off

00:55:36.120 it's like

00:55:36.440 two bad

00:55:36.940 situations

00:55:37.480 but we're

00:55:38.700 in the least

00:55:39.220 of the bad

00:55:39.820 see this

00:55:41.820 bugs me

00:55:42.220 like

00:55:42.540 you know

00:55:44.960 the stories

00:55:45.520 of

00:55:45.900 the

00:55:47.440 screw

00:55:48.480 that cost

00:55:49.580 you know

00:55:49.940 $50,000

00:55:51.560 or the

00:55:52.300 hammer

00:55:53.140 for the

00:55:53.560 military

00:55:53.900 project

00:55:54.520 that was

00:55:55.200 like

00:55:55.400 $75,000

00:55:56.420 and then

00:55:57.520 all the

00:55:57.780 people say

00:55:58.260 that's

00:55:59.000 outrageous

00:55:59.520 don't charge

00:56:01.020 $75,000

00:56:01.940 for a hammer

00:56:02.600 and then

00:56:03.440 you find out

00:56:04.320 that the

00:56:04.640 reason it's

00:56:05.080 $75,000

00:56:05.960 is that

00:56:07.460 they had

00:56:07.780 to create

00:56:08.820 and design

00:56:09.380 exactly one

00:56:10.140 hammer

00:56:10.460 that's it

00:56:11.600 it was like

00:56:12.180 one hammer

00:56:12.720 ever

00:56:13.060 and that's

00:56:14.420 why it

00:56:14.660 cost that

00:56:15.020 much

00:56:15.300 exactly

00:56:15.940 like it

00:56:16.420 should

00:56:16.700 so but

00:56:17.940 when the

00:56:18.240 news gets

00:56:18.680 a hold of

00:56:19.060 it

00:56:19.200 they don't

00:56:19.560 know how

00:56:19.800 to do

00:56:20.020 economics

00:56:20.640 so the

00:56:21.860 people report

00:56:22.640 it

00:56:22.860 just say

00:56:23.280 it's an

00:56:23.560 overpriced

00:56:24.140 hammer

00:56:24.500 but then

00:56:25.780 if you look

00:56:26.260 into it

00:56:26.620 even a little

00:56:27.180 bit

00:56:27.560 the people

00:56:28.480 say

00:56:28.800 well we

00:56:29.360 spent

00:56:29.720 $75,000

00:56:31.200 to make

00:56:31.880 the hammer

00:56:32.240 that's not

00:56:33.420 that's not

00:56:34.400 fake

00:56:34.820 it takes

00:56:36.180 a while

00:56:36.620 to design

00:56:37.640 it and

00:56:38.040 create it

00:56:38.660 and if

00:56:39.580 you're only

00:56:39.860 going to

00:56:40.040 make one

00:56:40.540 you've got

00:56:40.820 to make

00:56:41.020 a mold

00:56:41.460 just for

00:56:41.860 one thing

00:56:42.440 $75,000

00:56:43.880 so

00:56:45.200 the public

00:56:47.460 can't even

00:56:47.960 tell the

00:56:48.300 difference

00:56:48.620 between

00:56:49.060 an economic

00:56:49.720 bargain

00:56:50.200 and an

00:56:51.620 outrageous

00:56:52.120 ripoff

00:56:53.120 can't even

00:56:53.720 tell the

00:56:54.000 difference

00:56:54.360 so most

00:56:55.880 of these

00:56:56.080 stories are

00:56:56.500 fake

00:56:56.760 I would

00:56:58.260 like to

00:56:58.620 call out

00:56:59.140 I think

00:56:59.400 I told

00:56:59.680 my local

00:57:00.340 subscribers

00:57:00.860 this once

00:57:01.320 but I'm

00:57:02.080 going to

00:57:02.220 make a

00:57:02.500 prediction

00:57:02.860 do you

00:57:03.940 remember

00:57:04.180 the story

00:57:04.700 about the

00:57:05.080 four minute

00:57:05.580 mile

00:57:05.960 and how

00:57:07.560 it was

00:57:08.980 believed

00:57:09.340 nobody

00:57:09.720 would ever

00:57:10.100 run that

00:57:10.500 fast

00:57:11.020 until one

00:57:12.080 person

00:57:12.380 did

00:57:12.700 and then

00:57:13.820 when one

00:57:14.220 person

00:57:14.500 did

00:57:14.840 then other

00:57:15.520 people

00:57:15.840 could do

00:57:16.880 it too

00:57:17.220 and the

00:57:18.080 way I

00:57:18.420 learned it

00:57:18.840 was

00:57:19.160 that the

00:57:19.980 psychology

00:57:20.640 of it

00:57:21.020 once the

00:57:21.440 psychology

00:57:21.900 was broken

00:57:22.580 then the

00:57:23.820 humans

00:57:24.120 could perform

00:57:24.900 to a higher

00:57:25.380 level

00:57:25.700 I don't

00:57:27.420 believe that

00:57:28.080 I so

00:57:30.220 don't believe

00:57:30.760 that

00:57:31.100 I think

00:57:32.060 it had

00:57:32.260 everything

00:57:32.680 to do

00:57:33.080 with

00:57:33.320 maybe

00:57:33.740 the

00:57:34.040 footwear

00:57:35.020 was better

00:57:36.320 maybe the

00:57:37.620 training

00:57:37.960 was different

00:57:38.520 maybe they

00:57:39.180 learned a little

00:57:39.700 more about

00:57:40.140 nutrition

00:57:40.640 I don't

00:57:41.960 believe that

00:57:42.520 it's like

00:57:43.000 one of the

00:57:43.320 most

00:57:43.540 important

00:57:47.360 formative

00:57:48.320 stories of

00:57:49.160 my entire

00:57:49.780 life

00:57:50.520 was that

00:57:52.240 if you

00:57:52.960 got past

00:57:53.380 your mental

00:57:54.000 block

00:57:55.060 you could

00:57:55.540 do great

00:57:55.960 things

00:57:56.360 and I'll

00:57:57.060 bet none

00:57:57.380 of it

00:57:57.580 was true

00:57:57.940 I'll bet

00:57:59.220 none of

00:57:59.620 that was

00:57:59.920 ever true

00:58:00.360 what do

00:58:01.820 you think

00:58:02.180 yeah

00:58:03.880 could be

00:58:04.340 just the

00:58:04.680 shoes were

00:58:05.060 better

00:58:05.240 like you

00:58:05.600 said

00:58:05.820 could be

00:58:07.960 anything

00:58:08.240 the sound

00:58:12.480 barrier

00:58:12.860 is there

00:58:13.540 a similar

00:58:13.960 story about

00:58:14.500 that

00:58:15.000 Cerno

00:58:20.260 almost going

00:58:20.920 TDS and

00:58:21.600 splitting the

00:58:22.240 base

00:58:22.540 well I don't

00:58:23.940 believe that

00:58:24.460 Trump can

00:58:24.980 ever put

00:58:26.160 the base

00:58:26.560 back together

00:58:27.160 because the

00:58:27.940 vaccination

00:58:28.320 thing

00:58:28.960 by the way

00:58:30.140 I ran

00:58:30.460 a poll

00:58:30.840 how many

00:58:32.660 people thought

00:58:33.200 the vaccination

00:58:33.860 was killing

00:58:34.420 more people

00:58:34.900 than the

00:58:35.500 the COVID

00:58:36.580 and

00:58:38.040 yeah

00:58:39.100 about a

00:58:39.780 quarter of

00:58:40.280 the people

00:58:40.580 think the

00:58:42.280 vaccination is

00:58:43.040 killing more

00:58:43.660 a quarter

00:58:44.540 think that

00:58:45.220 roughly

00:58:46.700 that the

00:58:47.920 vaccine

00:58:48.300 so basically

00:58:50.040 it's split

00:58:52.240 but about

00:58:53.280 half of the

00:58:53.800 respondents

00:58:54.220 says you

00:58:54.720 can't tell

00:58:55.240 so who

00:58:56.540 was right

00:58:56.980 the ones

00:58:58.400 who said

00:58:58.720 vax killed

00:58:59.360 more

00:58:59.680 the people

00:59:00.240 who said

00:59:00.660 that the

00:59:01.200 COVID killed

00:59:01.760 more

00:59:02.080 or the

00:59:03.080 50% or so

00:59:04.220 who said

00:59:04.500 you can't

00:59:04.940 tell

00:59:05.160 who was

00:59:06.260 right

00:59:06.540 the ones

00:59:09.820 who say

00:59:10.080 you can't

00:59:10.460 tell

00:59:10.680 right

00:59:11.660 so that's

00:59:12.560 the better

00:59:13.000 answer

00:59:13.440 but there

00:59:14.560 might be

00:59:14.960 an answer

00:59:15.400 it's just

00:59:16.140 we don't

00:59:16.560 have access

00:59:17.020 to it

00:59:17.440 there might

00:59:17.940 be like a

00:59:18.420 reality

00:59:18.900 but that's

00:59:20.260 not available

00:59:21.200 to us

00:59:21.740 with our

00:59:23.060 current

00:59:23.320 data

00:59:23.640 yeah

00:59:25.220 and a

00:59:25.860 Twitter poll

00:59:26.320 of course

00:59:26.680 is not

00:59:27.040 meant to

00:59:27.320 be serious

00:59:27.920 of course

00:59:29.160 all right

00:59:30.940 bad question

00:59:37.360 you asked

00:59:37.740 what the

00:59:38.060 media thinks

00:59:38.660 no I

00:59:39.060 didn't

00:59:39.820 reread the

00:59:40.620 question

00:59:40.940 I did

00:59:42.800 not

00:59:43.120 I mean I

00:59:47.020 see why

00:59:47.340 you're saying

00:59:47.620 that

00:59:47.860 I said

00:59:48.280 based on

00:59:49.160 your reliable

00:59:49.860 media sources

00:59:50.660 but that's

00:59:51.320 how everybody

00:59:51.740 gets opinions

00:59:52.380 it's not

00:59:52.920 really about

00:59:53.340 the media

00:59:53.760 well so

01:00:02.140 I see

01:00:02.860 your analogy

01:00:03.480 and that's

01:00:03.960 a good reason

01:00:04.640 why analogies

01:00:05.360 don't work

01:00:05.840 so over

01:00:06.700 on local

01:00:07.060 somebody made

01:00:07.580 the analogy

01:00:08.040 that I tell

01:00:10.100 the story

01:00:10.560 about some

01:00:11.140 of my

01:00:11.440 cubemates

01:00:12.060 when I had

01:00:12.560 a corporate

01:00:13.020 job

01:00:13.400 when I

01:00:14.520 became a

01:00:14.980 successful

01:00:15.380 author

01:00:15.840 I was still

01:00:16.320 in my

01:00:16.600 cubicle

01:00:16.980 and two

01:00:18.240 people in

01:00:19.220 cubicles

01:00:19.620 next to

01:00:20.080 me

01:00:20.260 went on

01:00:21.220 to become

01:00:21.600 successful

01:00:22.140 authors

01:00:22.600 like got

01:00:23.440 books published

01:00:24.320 and I

01:00:25.780 always thought

01:00:26.180 it was because

01:00:26.740 I made it

01:00:27.420 look approachable

01:00:28.180 like they

01:00:29.540 saw me do

01:00:30.120 it and they

01:00:30.440 said well

01:00:31.140 there's nothing

01:00:31.660 magic about

01:00:32.340 you

01:00:32.660 it looks like

01:00:33.880 I could do

01:00:34.300 that too

01:00:34.740 and they

01:00:35.480 were right

01:00:35.820 and then they

01:00:37.000 just did it

01:00:37.680 just like I

01:00:38.580 did

01:00:38.780 so but that's

01:00:40.440 different than

01:00:40.860 the four minute

01:00:41.340 mile

01:00:41.640 the difference

01:00:42.680 is that

01:00:43.560 all of us

01:00:45.000 had the

01:00:45.300 ability

01:00:45.680 like that

01:00:47.440 part was a

01:00:48.060 given

01:00:48.280 it was only

01:00:49.580 thinking of

01:00:50.540 doing it

01:00:51.140 that was

01:00:51.660 different

01:00:52.020 once they

01:00:53.100 thought of

01:00:53.640 doing it

01:00:54.080 then they

01:00:54.580 already had

01:00:55.120 the ability

01:00:55.600 so that

01:00:56.700 but we don't

01:00:57.620 know that

01:00:57.880 that's the

01:00:58.220 same situation

01:00:58.820 with the

01:00:59.200 running

01:00:59.460 we don't

01:01:00.460 know if

01:01:00.720 they had

01:01:01.060 the ability

01:01:01.560 and just

01:01:02.380 didn't use

01:01:03.020 it

01:01:03.260 or if there

01:01:04.500 was something

01:01:04.860 that was

01:01:05.120 changing at

01:01:05.660 about the

01:01:06.020 same time

01:01:06.520 like footwear

01:01:07.640 technology

01:01:08.280 for example

01:01:08.920 but

01:01:10.000 and I've

01:01:11.240 told you

01:01:11.500 before that

01:01:11.980 I definitely

01:01:12.540 doubt

01:01:12.940 the having

01:01:14.320 small amounts

01:01:15.100 of alcohol

01:01:15.760 is good

01:01:16.720 for your

01:01:17.000 health

01:01:17.280 like that

01:01:18.940 is so

01:01:19.320 not going

01:01:19.740 to be

01:01:19.960 true

01:01:20.220 in the

01:01:20.560 long run

01:01:21.000 I would

01:01:22.260 put a

01:01:22.960 large bet

01:01:23.740 if there

01:01:24.720 were any

01:01:25.000 way to

01:01:25.240 actually know

01:01:25.680 for sure

01:01:26.100 that there's

01:01:27.360 no amount

01:01:27.800 of alcohol

01:01:28.200 that's good

01:01:28.620 for you

01:01:29.020 I would

01:01:30.060 at least

01:01:30.360 a very

01:01:30.880 large bet

01:01:31.440 on that

01:01:31.900 when you

01:01:36.020 get the

01:01:36.340 vax again

01:01:37.180 you mean

01:01:38.360 as well

01:01:39.060 I'm not

01:01:39.380 getting the

01:01:39.740 boosters

01:01:40.080 but you

01:01:42.320 can't really

01:01:42.780 go back

01:01:43.380 and act

01:01:44.260 like if

01:01:44.780 you knew

01:01:45.060 what you

01:01:45.380 knew

01:01:45.600 then

01:01:45.940 if I

01:01:47.560 knew

01:01:47.700 what I

01:01:47.980 knew

01:01:48.100 then

01:01:48.360 I'd

01:01:48.580 make

01:01:48.740 the

01:01:48.900 same

01:01:49.060 decision

01:01:49.520 if I

01:01:51.200 know

01:01:51.380 what I

01:01:51.660 know

01:01:51.840 now

01:01:52.320 I don't

01:01:54.460 know

01:01:54.700 because I

01:01:55.520 still would

01:01:55.860 have missed

01:01:56.660 my

01:01:57.080 vacation

01:01:57.780 so

01:01:59.820 I don't

01:02:01.160 know

01:02:01.720 it

01:02:02.020 you also

01:02:04.040 have to

01:02:04.380 make a

01:02:04.700 distinction

01:02:05.100 between

01:02:05.700 making the

01:02:06.860 right decision

01:02:07.520 and getting

01:02:08.500 a good

01:02:08.860 outcome

01:02:09.240 so I

01:02:10.800 would argue

01:02:11.220 that I

01:02:11.660 got the

01:02:11.960 best possible

01:02:12.680 outcome

01:02:13.100 because I

01:02:14.080 have no

01:02:14.540 known

01:02:15.020 complications

01:02:15.740 yet

01:02:16.980 and I

01:02:18.200 had a

01:02:18.640 great

01:02:18.940 vacation

01:02:19.380 and it

01:02:19.840 made me

01:02:20.160 feel more

01:02:20.840 comfortable

01:02:21.260 during the

01:02:21.760 pandemic

01:02:22.140 so for

01:02:23.440 me

01:02:23.780 I only

01:02:24.980 got benefits

01:02:25.720 and I

01:02:26.680 got no

01:02:27.040 downside

01:02:27.500 but

01:02:28.680 does that

01:02:29.580 mean it

01:02:29.820 was a

01:02:30.080 smart

01:02:30.300 decision

01:02:30.740 go

01:02:31.540 it all

01:02:32.460 it all

01:02:32.840 turned out

01:02:33.260 great

01:02:33.680 for me

01:02:34.280 I got

01:02:34.620 everything

01:02:34.960 I got

01:02:35.420 a vacation

01:02:35.920 and no

01:02:36.860 downside

01:02:37.240 so so

01:02:38.640 was it a

01:02:39.020 good decision

01:02:39.500 or a bad

01:02:39.900 decision

01:02:40.300 it's

01:02:42.380 unknown

01:02:42.740 it's

01:02:43.740 unknown

01:02:44.080 exactly

01:02:44.760 there's

01:02:45.560 no way

01:02:45.880 you can

01:02:46.120 know

01:02:46.240 that was

01:02:46.520 a good

01:02:46.740 decision

01:02:47.100 the only

01:02:47.840 thing you

01:02:48.160 can know

01:02:48.460 is what

01:02:48.720 you did

01:02:49.100 I can tell

01:02:50.420 you what

01:02:50.620 I did

01:02:51.060 I can't

01:02:52.140 tell you

01:02:52.700 that was

01:02:52.960 the right

01:02:53.200 decision

01:02:53.580 what if

01:02:54.400 I have

01:02:54.700 some

01:02:54.900 medical

01:02:55.160 problems

01:02:55.540 I don't

01:02:55.780 know

01:02:55.940 about

01:02:56.220 well I

01:02:57.360 don't

01:02:57.520 know

01:02:57.880 right

01:02:58.620 it's

01:02:58.820 unknowable

01:02:59.340 totally

01:03:00.880 unknowable

01:03:01.400 but would

01:03:02.300 you agree

01:03:02.840 that so

01:03:04.120 far

01:03:04.580 I won't

01:03:05.860 say it

01:03:06.140 was the

01:03:06.500 smart

01:03:07.060 decision

01:03:07.520 but would

01:03:08.460 you say

01:03:08.780 so far

01:03:09.500 I got

01:03:10.300 everything

01:03:10.740 I wanted

01:03:11.300 would you

01:03:12.340 agree with

01:03:12.680 that statement

01:03:13.200 I'm one

01:03:14.340 of the

01:03:14.540 people who

01:03:14.940 got everything

01:03:15.500 they wanted

01:03:16.040 because I

01:03:17.100 got the

01:03:17.420 trip

01:03:17.720 and I

01:03:19.000 got no

01:03:19.340 side

01:03:19.560 effects

01:03:19.900 right

01:03:21.200 I had

01:03:22.900 full access

01:03:23.400 to society

01:03:24.280 with no

01:03:25.180 side effects

01:03:25.700 now that

01:03:26.820 doesn't mean

01:03:27.220 it was the

01:03:27.520 right decision

01:03:28.080 because like

01:03:29.820 we said

01:03:30.280 maybe I

01:03:31.380 got lucky

01:03:31.920 you know

01:03:32.980 maybe the

01:03:33.380 odds were

01:03:33.860 bad

01:03:34.360 but I

01:03:35.480 just was

01:03:35.900 one of

01:03:36.160 the lucky

01:03:36.480 ones

01:03:36.800 I have

01:03:37.260 no way

01:03:37.540 to know

01:03:37.840 but if

01:03:40.260 you're

01:03:40.400 making fun

01:03:40.940 of me

01:03:41.320 for getting

01:03:41.860 everything

01:03:42.280 I want

01:03:42.940 based on

01:03:44.000 the path

01:03:44.400 that I

01:03:44.700 took

01:03:44.960 that's

01:03:46.120 kind of

01:03:46.400 sketchy

01:03:46.900 there are

01:03:48.280 a lot

01:03:48.460 of people

01:03:48.780 who mock

01:03:49.340 me

01:03:49.640 for my

01:03:50.480 choices

01:03:50.860 and I

01:03:51.280 think

01:03:51.500 I got

01:03:52.440 everything

01:03:52.800 I want

01:03:53.320 and no

01:03:53.920 downside

01:03:54.300 you did

01:03:56.000 not

01:03:56.400 but you're

01:03:57.660 mocking me

01:03:58.320 shouldn't

01:03:59.460 the person

01:03:59.860 who got

01:04:00.200 everything

01:04:00.580 they wanted

01:04:01.260 at least

01:04:02.540 be given

01:04:03.020 the consideration

01:04:03.620 that at least

01:04:04.480 you didn't

01:04:04.800 do it

01:04:05.040 wrong

01:04:05.360 I can't

01:04:06.660 say I

01:04:06.920 did it

01:04:07.200 right

01:04:07.560 but I

01:04:10.080 didn't fall

01:04:10.540 into a

01:04:10.900 pit hole

01:04:11.240 you got a

01:04:14.120 divorce from

01:04:14.580 the pandemic

01:04:15.080 too

01:04:15.360 how many of

01:04:16.340 you got

01:04:16.780 divorced

01:04:18.280 because of

01:04:18.800 the pandemic

01:04:19.280 no I

01:04:23.040 didn't

01:04:23.260 refute

01:04:23.600 my

01:04:23.800 four

01:04:24.000 miles

01:04:24.240 story

01:04:24.980 oh

01:04:27.860 that's

01:04:28.780 pretty sad

01:04:29.320 boy

01:04:30.420 that was

01:04:30.700 a

01:04:30.880 yeah I

01:04:31.960 think there

01:04:32.280 was some

01:04:32.620 causation

01:04:33.160 it just

01:04:33.540 caused

01:04:33.780 people to

01:04:34.460 interact

01:04:35.240 in a

01:04:35.720 different

01:04:35.960 way

01:04:36.460 you're

01:04:42.600 telling me

01:04:42.920 I'm going

01:04:43.180 to die

01:04:43.560 over at

01:04:43.960 Locals

01:04:44.300 oh you

01:04:46.440 got divorced

01:04:46.880 in advance

01:04:47.420 good

01:04:47.740 good

01:04:48.300 current

01:04:51.840 slutter

01:04:52.180 meter

01:04:52.400 well let

01:04:53.160 me give

01:04:53.400 you a

01:04:54.020 current

01:04:54.880 update

01:04:55.240 on what

01:04:55.600 I think

01:04:55.860 about the

01:04:56.260 whole

01:04:56.620 Trump

01:04:57.380 running for

01:04:57.880 president

01:04:58.220 situation

01:04:58.800 yes

01:05:00.800 you don't

01:05:02.640 know I

01:05:02.880 got divorced

01:05:03.480 I'm going

01:05:04.480 to cut

01:05:04.980 off the

01:05:05.340 outside people

01:05:06.000 from the

01:05:06.560 locals

01:05:06.920 feed

01:05:07.420 because I

01:05:07.840 think we

01:05:08.140 got some

01:05:08.580 extras

01:05:09.540 there

01:05:09.760 if you

01:05:10.020 want to

01:05:10.340 I'm

01:05:11.040 almost done

01:05:11.480 here

01:05:11.640 anyway

01:05:11.940 all right

01:05:13.120 so if

01:05:13.540 you're not

01:05:13.820 a subscriber

01:05:14.340 you just

01:05:14.760 disappeared

01:05:15.220 you seem

01:05:19.100 happier

01:05:19.420 single

01:05:19.840 totally

01:05:20.640 I'm so

01:05:22.320 much happier

01:05:22.820 single

01:05:23.220 and if

01:05:25.720 you had

01:05:26.320 told me

01:05:26.700 that would

01:05:27.000 be the

01:05:27.280 case

01:05:27.620 I think

01:05:27.960 I would

01:05:28.200 have been

01:05:28.420 surprised

01:05:28.940 but totally

01:05:30.360 happier

01:05:30.760 totally

01:05:31.760 happier

01:05:32.120 I don't

01:05:34.420 know how

01:05:34.660 relationships

01:05:35.180 work

01:05:35.620 I honestly

01:05:36.100 don't

01:05:36.540 like I

01:05:37.200 don't know

01:05:37.420 how anybody

01:05:37.840 does it

01:05:38.640 good

01:05:40.280 let me

01:05:41.120 give you

01:05:41.360 the

01:05:41.580 here

01:05:42.200 here's

01:05:42.540 why I

01:05:42.760 think

01:05:42.980 I don't

01:05:43.940 know how

01:05:44.180 they work

01:05:44.560 let's

01:05:48.600 say a

01:05:48.880 traditional

01:05:49.400 arrangement

01:05:51.800 like old

01:05:52.580 time

01:05:52.960 old time

01:05:54.420 way

01:05:54.640 where the

01:05:55.480 man is

01:05:56.260 working

01:05:56.600 and the

01:05:58.480 woman

01:05:59.000 may or

01:05:59.800 may not

01:06:00.060 have kids

01:06:00.720 but that's

01:06:02.200 her kind

01:06:03.060 of domain

01:06:03.560 so she's

01:06:04.200 not working

01:06:04.760 in 2022

01:06:06.720 that can't

01:06:07.600 work

01:06:07.960 that just

01:06:10.880 won't

01:06:11.100 work

01:06:11.400 do you

01:06:11.740 know why

01:06:12.100 what the

01:06:13.240 hell is

01:06:13.440 a woman

01:06:13.720 going to

01:06:14.000 do all

01:06:14.280 day

01:06:14.540 her kids

01:06:15.700 go to

01:06:16.020 school

01:06:16.400 or once

01:06:17.300 they reach

01:06:17.620 a certain

01:06:17.900 age

01:06:18.220 by the

01:06:18.760 time

01:06:18.920 they're

01:06:19.060 12

01:06:19.420 they just

01:06:20.460 want to

01:06:20.680 go in

01:06:20.940 the room

01:06:21.260 or play

01:06:21.580 with their

01:06:21.860 friends

01:06:22.140 you barely

01:06:22.820 ever see

01:06:23.240 them

01:06:23.400 so what

01:06:25.020 would give

01:06:26.080 a woman

01:06:26.680 in that

01:06:27.280 situation

01:06:27.800 any

01:06:28.360 satisfying

01:06:30.480 life

01:06:31.040 what's

01:06:32.020 you going

01:06:32.220 to do

01:06:32.400 have lunch

01:06:32.860 with the

01:06:33.140 other

01:06:33.520 moms

01:06:34.340 go to

01:06:35.740 the gym

01:06:36.140 like there's

01:06:37.400 nothing

01:06:37.680 there

01:06:38.020 just

01:06:39.160 support her

01:06:40.100 husband

01:06:40.380 and have

01:06:41.780 his shoes

01:06:42.320 and his

01:06:42.900 martini

01:06:43.460 ready when

01:06:43.900 he gets

01:06:44.140 home

01:06:44.400 like nothing

01:06:45.500 like that

01:06:45.940 works

01:06:46.360 so a

01:06:49.020 situation

01:06:49.420 that can't

01:06:50.020 work

01:06:50.380 like even

01:06:51.640 on paper

01:06:52.120 it doesn't

01:06:52.560 work

01:06:52.820 is the

01:06:53.600 man is

01:06:54.000 working

01:06:54.340 and the

01:06:56.400 woman is

01:06:56.840 not

01:06:57.140 now I

01:06:58.300 assume if

01:06:58.840 you reverse

01:06:59.340 that it's

01:06:59.780 the same

01:07:00.200 right

01:07:01.100 so let's

01:07:01.920 be a little

01:07:02.520 more 2022

01:07:03.640 if you

01:07:04.720 reverse it

01:07:05.320 and the

01:07:06.260 woman is

01:07:06.660 the only

01:07:06.960 one working

01:07:07.480 and the

01:07:08.060 man is

01:07:08.480 home not

01:07:08.940 working

01:07:09.340 but let's

01:07:10.340 say he has

01:07:10.760 more child

01:07:11.320 care stuff

01:07:11.900 how is that

01:07:12.640 ever going

01:07:12.960 to work

01:07:13.380 I mean

01:07:14.800 really

01:07:15.080 how will

01:07:16.380 that ever

01:07:16.800 work

01:07:17.220 because what

01:07:17.900 is the

01:07:18.660 guy's

01:07:18.920 purpose

01:07:19.340 the guy

01:07:20.440 has no

01:07:20.780 purpose

01:07:21.260 now every

01:07:23.320 now and

01:07:23.580 then you

01:07:23.820 see a

01:07:24.380 situation

01:07:24.800 where you

01:07:25.140 think

01:07:25.460 somebody

01:07:26.500 figured

01:07:26.900 it out

01:07:27.320 and I

01:07:27.900 think that

01:07:28.220 exists

01:07:28.680 right

01:07:29.020 like everybody

01:07:29.580 is different

01:07:29.980 when I

01:07:30.960 look at

01:07:31.220 for example

01:07:31.640 my universal

01:07:32.900 reference

01:07:33.420 who am I

01:07:34.160 going to

01:07:34.340 mention

01:07:34.580 now

01:07:34.860 who's my

01:07:35.700 universal

01:07:36.220 reference

01:07:36.780 it's like

01:07:37.760 the typo

01:07:38.320 blood

01:07:38.680 there's

01:07:39.600 somebody I

01:07:39.980 mention

01:07:40.240 all the

01:07:40.740 time

01:07:41.200 yeah

01:07:43.320 sort of

01:07:43.620 itch

01:07:43.840 so

01:07:44.660 sort of

01:07:45.060 itch

01:07:45.340 uses

01:07:46.400 social

01:07:46.820 media

01:07:47.220 to

01:07:48.380 show a

01:07:50.060 little

01:07:50.160 behind the

01:07:50.680 scenes

01:07:50.960 at least

01:07:51.260 a little

01:07:51.520 bit

01:07:51.760 of his

01:07:52.360 family

01:07:52.680 life

01:07:53.060 right

01:07:53.860 so

01:07:54.680 but there's

01:07:55.680 a situation

01:07:56.220 where they

01:07:56.560 have a

01:07:56.760 really unique

01:07:57.420 situation

01:07:58.000 where they're

01:07:58.520 both productive

01:07:59.280 but in

01:07:59.800 different ways

01:08:00.540 he has a

01:08:01.460 unique situation

01:08:02.180 where he

01:08:02.540 could be

01:08:02.920 doing a

01:08:03.900 productive

01:08:04.240 thing

01:08:04.700 while he's

01:08:05.240 also home

01:08:05.780 so he can

01:08:06.780 actually do

01:08:07.240 both things

01:08:07.800 now I would

01:08:08.540 say that's a

01:08:09.080 big big

01:08:09.900 exception

01:08:10.420 wouldn't you

01:08:10.960 like I

01:08:12.460 can't speak

01:08:13.180 to the

01:08:13.480 actual

01:08:13.780 quality of

01:08:14.820 his

01:08:14.940 relationship

01:08:15.440 but on

01:08:16.300 paper

01:08:16.640 on paper

01:08:18.220 it looks like

01:08:18.760 he figured

01:08:19.160 it out

01:08:19.500 to me

01:08:20.920 it looks

01:08:21.200 like that's

01:08:21.620 the closest

01:08:22.220 I've seen

01:08:23.600 to a model

01:08:24.200 that could

01:08:24.780 work

01:08:25.240 again

01:08:25.920 we're on

01:08:26.320 the outside

01:08:26.800 nobody has

01:08:28.220 any idea

01:08:28.680 what anybody's

01:08:29.440 relationship

01:08:29.920 is like

01:08:30.340 on the

01:08:30.580 inside

01:08:30.880 but from

01:08:31.500 the outside

01:08:31.920 at least

01:08:32.340 it works

01:08:32.660 on paper

01:08:33.140 that looks

01:08:34.140 like a

01:08:34.460 thing that

01:08:34.780 could work

01:08:35.140 because those

01:08:35.820 are two

01:08:36.140 people who

01:08:36.640 seem fulfilled

01:08:37.340 and both

01:08:38.980 involved with

01:08:39.560 children

01:08:39.920 that's about

01:08:42.100 it

01:08:42.340 that's as

01:08:42.760 good as

01:08:42.980 you can

01:08:43.180 do

01:08:43.380 but now

01:08:44.700 let's take

01:08:45.020 the other

01:08:45.380 example

01:08:45.740 where

01:08:46.120 they're both

01:08:47.900 high powered

01:08:49.540 high income

01:08:50.360 people

01:08:50.720 and maybe

01:08:52.120 they have

01:08:52.400 kids or

01:08:52.760 not

01:08:53.080 and the

01:08:54.480 kids are

01:08:55.740 handled by

01:08:56.920 other caretakers

01:08:57.780 and stuff

01:08:58.140 because they're

01:08:58.620 both working

01:08:59.180 during the

01:08:59.560 day

01:08:59.780 can that

01:09:00.880 work

01:09:01.240 isn't that

01:09:03.680 just two

01:09:04.380 people who

01:09:05.160 spend the

01:09:06.440 day separately

01:09:07.080 like then

01:09:08.660 they get

01:09:08.980 together and

01:09:09.600 they spend

01:09:10.080 all day

01:09:10.620 with their

01:09:11.620 co-workers

01:09:12.200 who are

01:09:12.740 clean and

01:09:14.180 act nice

01:09:16.220 and they look

01:09:17.360 kind of

01:09:17.640 attractive

01:09:18.080 and then the

01:09:19.200 other one

01:09:19.520 spent all day

01:09:20.140 with you know

01:09:20.680 some men

01:09:21.160 who are

01:09:22.180 successful

01:09:22.760 and you know

01:09:24.140 they got it

01:09:24.500 going on

01:09:25.000 then you come

01:09:26.320 home to your

01:09:26.740 spouse both of

01:09:27.640 you and

01:09:28.740 your spouse

01:09:29.300 you know

01:09:29.560 takes off

01:09:29.980 the makeup

01:09:30.420 and the

01:09:31.300 guy takes

01:09:31.760 off his

01:09:32.140 necktie

01:09:32.680 and then you

01:09:34.120 turn into

01:09:34.540 your slouch

01:09:35.140 selves at

01:09:35.820 home so

01:09:37.000 you're looking

01:09:37.360 at each

01:09:37.720 other as

01:09:38.160 slouches all

01:09:38.820 day long

01:09:39.300 and then you

01:09:40.240 go off to

01:09:40.580 your separate

01:09:41.000 high powered

01:09:41.520 jobs and

01:09:42.160 you're around

01:09:42.640 people who

01:09:43.600 have cleaned

01:09:44.000 up like

01:09:45.260 all those

01:09:45.640 people are

01:09:46.040 slouches at

01:09:46.640 home too

01:09:47.040 but at

01:09:47.380 work they

01:09:47.780 look like

01:09:48.460 they're

01:09:48.640 killing it

01:09:49.180 that can't

01:09:50.700 work on

01:09:52.360 paper that

01:09:53.380 can't work

01:09:54.060 right now

01:09:56.400 again there

01:09:57.240 are individual

01:09:57.760 differences you

01:09:59.040 could find two

01:10:00.380 people who

01:10:01.220 will make

01:10:01.580 anything work

01:10:02.480 right they're

01:10:03.540 just the right

01:10:04.180 personalities and

01:10:05.040 the right

01:10:05.340 situations and

01:10:06.460 maybe maybe

01:10:07.360 sort of each

01:10:08.220 family is in

01:10:09.560 that situation

01:10:10.220 and good for

01:10:11.180 them you know

01:10:11.880 anybody who

01:10:12.340 could crack

01:10:12.800 this anybody

01:10:14.040 can crack

01:10:14.600 this problem

01:10:15.240 as my

01:10:15.780 respect because

01:10:16.560 it's a tough

01:10:17.020 one

01:10:17.280 but but to

01:10:20.280 me it's just

01:10:20.760 two situations

01:10:21.480 that on paper

01:10:22.420 can't work

01:10:23.100 and that and

01:10:24.200 we've we've

01:10:24.900 we've organized

01:10:26.380 American civilization

01:10:28.820 around two

01:10:30.560 ideas that

01:10:31.340 largely don't

01:10:32.000 even work on

01:10:32.540 paper and

01:10:33.900 then we wonder

01:10:34.380 why they don't

01:10:34.840 work in reality

01:10:35.600 they don't work

01:10:37.460 on paper

01:10:37.920 I mean it

01:10:39.540 shouldn't be a

01:10:40.160 surprise right

01:10:41.520 it should be

01:10:42.320 exactly what you

01:10:43.080 think it

01:10:44.100 should it

01:10:44.500 should and

01:10:45.340 it is it's

01:10:46.580 exactly what

01:10:47.260 you think

01:10:47.780 based on the

01:10:48.980 situation

01:10:49.440 now that

01:10:53.640 said I

01:10:54.460 also know

01:10:55.060 two people

01:10:55.680 who have

01:10:56.280 what looks

01:10:58.320 like one of

01:10:58.720 the best

01:10:59.020 marriages I've

01:10:59.720 ever seen

01:11:00.160 and there

01:11:01.920 are two

01:11:02.320 people who

01:11:03.400 work high

01:11:04.620 power jobs

01:11:05.280 and their

01:11:06.640 kid is out

01:11:07.600 of the nest

01:11:08.480 so there's

01:11:09.500 no kid

01:11:09.860 stuff anymore

01:11:10.720 and but

01:11:12.380 again it's a

01:11:13.080 special case

01:11:13.800 because they

01:11:14.940 got together

01:11:15.420 when they

01:11:15.760 were 16

01:11:17.140 I think

01:11:17.600 right

01:11:18.740 if you

01:11:19.560 get together

01:11:19.960 when you're

01:11:20.260 16 and

01:11:21.080 you never

01:11:21.500 know anybody

01:11:22.160 else after

01:11:22.740 that that's

01:11:24.100 a pretty solid

01:11:24.700 base so

01:11:26.360 every time you

01:11:26.880 see a couple

01:11:27.520 who makes

01:11:27.980 anything work

01:11:28.860 whether it's

01:11:29.880 one working

01:11:30.480 or not or

01:11:31.180 both working

01:11:31.800 whenever you

01:11:32.780 see a work

01:11:33.280 there's always

01:11:33.800 a special case

01:11:34.800 and that's

01:11:35.740 like a really

01:11:36.240 special case

01:11:37.080 you know

01:11:38.200 basically hooking

01:11:39.220 up at 16

01:11:39.940 and never

01:11:40.720 being with

01:11:41.160 anybody else

01:11:41.780 right

01:11:42.700 so good

01:11:44.180 for them

01:11:44.560 I think

01:11:45.520 that I

01:11:46.220 believe they

01:11:46.660 genuinely broke

01:11:47.480 the code

01:11:47.980 they actually

01:11:49.100 figured out

01:11:49.600 how to make

01:11:49.900 it work

01:11:50.280 what is

01:11:53.080 Andrew Tate's

01:11:53.780 theory

01:11:54.040 by the way

01:11:58.440 I am so

01:11:59.380 amused by

01:12:00.000 the Andrew

01:12:00.680 Tate stuff

01:12:01.540 the fact

01:12:05.240 that he's

01:12:05.600 giving like

01:12:06.300 lifestyle and

01:12:07.140 health related

01:12:08.420 advice while

01:12:09.840 he drinks

01:12:10.340 whiskey and

01:12:10.880 smokes cigars

01:12:11.640 and he's

01:12:12.780 giving relationship

01:12:13.640 advice when

01:12:14.580 he clearly

01:12:15.040 has like no

01:12:16.480 relationship

01:12:17.040 working at

01:12:17.640 all

01:12:17.920 and it

01:12:22.100 works

01:12:22.500 like he

01:12:23.260 actually pulls

01:12:23.840 it off

01:12:24.280 so this is

01:12:25.500 a genuine

01:12:26.020 compliment

01:12:26.640 he totally

01:12:27.660 pulls it

01:12:28.100 off

01:12:28.380 and the

01:12:29.860 I think

01:12:31.340 it's the

01:12:31.720 dichotomy

01:12:32.360 or the

01:12:33.140 fact that

01:12:34.260 it doesn't

01:12:34.640 look like

01:12:35.020 it's supposed

01:12:35.480 to look

01:12:35.960 like there's

01:12:36.760 something just

01:12:37.220 off about

01:12:37.740 the whole

01:12:38.040 thing

01:12:38.380 is exactly

01:12:39.260 why he

01:12:40.020 attracts so

01:12:40.840 much energy

01:12:41.360 which I

01:12:42.560 think he

01:12:42.800 does

01:12:42.980 intentionally

01:12:43.380 so it's

01:12:44.320 all good

01:12:44.740 it's all

01:12:45.120 smart

01:12:45.460 but the

01:12:47.520 fact that

01:12:48.320 the fact

01:12:50.540 that he's

01:12:50.940 followed for

01:12:51.500 his advice

01:12:52.260 and even

01:12:53.720 his financial

01:12:54.360 advice

01:12:54.880 his financial

01:12:58.280 advice

01:12:58.660 he's spending

01:12:59.600 his money

01:12:59.980 on like

01:13:00.720 luxury

01:13:01.140 sports cars

01:13:01.980 like that's

01:13:03.120 the worst

01:13:03.620 financial

01:13:04.840 it's not

01:13:05.340 advice

01:13:05.620 but it's

01:13:06.140 the worst

01:13:06.380 example you

01:13:07.180 could ever

01:13:07.460 give anybody

01:13:08.060 have you seen

01:13:09.940 some black

01:13:10.800 leaders talking

01:13:11.700 lately

01:13:12.060 and I say

01:13:13.340 the reason I

01:13:14.320 say black

01:13:14.780 leaders

01:13:15.160 is so I

01:13:16.040 can give

01:13:16.320 myself some

01:13:16.860 cover

01:13:17.260 right

01:13:18.120 so this

01:13:18.540 is not

01:13:18.900 me

01:13:19.180 this is

01:13:20.180 black

01:13:20.700 leaders

01:13:21.100 you've

01:13:21.680 heard this

01:13:22.020 right

01:13:22.240 so black

01:13:23.140 leaders

01:13:23.420 saying

01:13:23.760 if you

01:13:24.460 talk to

01:13:24.960 a bunch

01:13:25.860 of

01:13:26.160 you know

01:13:26.960 white kids

01:13:27.680 or anybody

01:13:28.500 who's not

01:13:28.860 black

01:13:29.220 about their

01:13:30.080 future

01:13:30.480 like what

01:13:31.120 do you

01:13:31.260 want to

01:13:31.500 be

01:13:31.780 you get

01:13:32.940 stuff like

01:13:33.520 oh doctor

01:13:34.260 or programmer

01:13:35.100 or whatever

01:13:35.480 and you talk

01:13:36.440 to black

01:13:36.840 kids

01:13:37.100 this is what

01:13:37.540 black leaders

01:13:38.100 say

01:13:38.340 this is not

01:13:39.000 me being

01:13:39.420 racist

01:13:39.860 I'm telling

01:13:40.740 you what

01:13:41.060 black leaders

01:13:42.120 say about

01:13:42.740 their own

01:13:43.040 people

01:13:43.340 they say

01:13:43.980 you talk

01:13:44.240 to black

01:13:44.620 kids

01:13:44.860 they say

01:13:45.220 I want

01:13:45.460 to play

01:13:45.700 basketball

01:13:46.200 or

01:13:46.640 yeah

01:13:47.580 it's like

01:13:48.320 completely

01:13:48.720 impractical

01:13:49.460 and

01:13:51.260 and the

01:13:52.120 black

01:13:52.360 leaders

01:13:52.680 are like

01:13:53.020 you got

01:13:53.940 to fix

01:13:54.260 that

01:13:54.660 like

01:13:55.680 yeah

01:13:55.920 or rapper

01:13:56.460 right

01:13:56.700 yeah

01:13:56.940 rapper

01:13:57.300 or basketball

01:13:57.800 player

01:13:58.080 or athlete

01:13:58.880 or something

01:13:59.260 and

01:14:00.060 and even

01:14:00.800 the black

01:14:01.200 leaders

01:14:01.480 are like

01:14:01.740 there's no

01:14:02.320 way

01:14:02.540 this works

01:14:03.120 there's no

01:14:04.260 way

01:14:04.460 this could

01:14:04.880 work

01:14:05.240 like

01:14:05.980 we got

01:14:06.420 to fix

01:14:06.740 that

01:14:06.920 what's

01:14:07.160 wrong

01:14:07.340 with that

01:14:07.760 it's a

01:14:08.780 good

01:14:08.900 point

01:14:09.200 it's a

01:14:10.160 good

01:14:10.280 point

01:14:10.580 somebody

01:14:15.340 says that

01:14:15.880 when you

01:14:16.620 survey black

01:14:17.300 kids

01:14:17.660 they say

01:14:18.820 that getting

01:14:19.180 good grades

01:14:19.780 is something

01:14:20.160 white kids

01:14:20.780 do

01:14:21.040 gotta fix

01:14:22.300 that

01:14:22.660 gotta fix

01:14:23.860 that

01:14:24.140 point

01:14:24.560 of view

01:14:24.860 yeah

01:14:28.860 um

01:14:32.860 would you

01:14:34.100 consider

01:14:34.580 unblocking

01:14:35.340 sticks

01:14:35.700 why

01:14:37.580 should

01:14:37.860 I

01:14:38.100 let me

01:14:39.560 ask you

01:14:39.860 this

01:14:40.140 if

01:14:41.660 somebody

01:14:42.400 shows a

01:14:43.280 pattern

01:14:43.660 of

01:14:43.960 disrespect

01:14:44.500 to you

01:14:45.060 do you

01:14:46.040 think

01:14:46.260 that

01:14:46.500 in the

01:14:47.080 let's

01:14:49.300 say

01:14:49.560 in

01:14:49.960 considering

01:14:50.800 charity

01:14:51.540 and being

01:14:52.300 a good

01:14:52.620 person

01:14:53.020 that

01:14:54.340 the

01:14:54.620 higher

01:14:55.140 level

01:14:55.660 good

01:14:57.300 thing

01:14:57.540 to do

01:14:57.900 would be

01:14:58.220 to forgive

01:14:58.640 them

01:14:58.940 for

01:15:00.240 disrespecting

01:15:01.140 you

01:15:01.300 more

01:15:01.540 than

01:15:01.700 once

01:15:02.140 oh

01:15:08.460 thank

01:15:09.000 you

01:15:09.120 Emily

01:15:09.380 yeah

01:15:11.080 no

01:15:11.700 I've

01:15:12.700 never

01:15:13.000 removed

01:15:14.820 anybody

01:15:15.240 from my

01:15:15.760 life

01:15:16.120 and regretted

01:15:16.880 it

01:15:17.120 have you

01:15:17.980 have you

01:15:18.980 ever removed

01:15:19.540 anybody

01:15:19.840 from your

01:15:20.280 life

01:15:20.680 and then

01:15:21.920 later

01:15:22.220 regretted

01:15:22.720 it

01:15:22.960 I mean

01:15:25.380 maybe it's

01:15:26.020 happened

01:15:26.300 but

01:15:26.660 I don't think

01:15:27.980 it's ever

01:15:28.320 happened

01:15:28.580 to me

01:15:29.000 so

01:15:30.260 so do you

01:15:30.460 think

01:15:30.620 I'll

01:15:30.800 someday

01:15:31.100 regret

01:15:31.700 that

01:15:33.580 that I

01:15:36.240 removed

01:15:36.640 sticks and

01:15:37.100 hammer

01:15:37.280 from my

01:15:38.160 twitter feed

01:15:38.740 I doubt it

01:15:40.120 I've never

01:15:40.820 thought about

01:15:41.260 it yet

01:15:41.700 never thought

01:15:45.060 about it

01:15:45.380 yet

01:15:45.640 so

01:15:47.380 I would

01:15:49.280 if those

01:15:50.340 of you

01:15:50.680 who are

01:15:51.060 enjoying

01:15:51.560 his work

01:15:52.840 want to

01:15:54.400 keep enjoying

01:15:54.980 his work

01:15:55.540 I say

01:15:56.460 great

01:15:56.780 because he

01:15:57.860 hasn't

01:15:58.140 disrespected

01:15:58.740 you

01:15:58.960 right

01:15:59.160 but if

01:16:00.320 he

01:16:00.440 disrespects

01:16:01.120 you

01:16:01.220 in public

01:16:01.760 twice

01:16:02.980 well I'm

01:16:05.960 supposed to

01:16:06.320 wait for

01:16:06.600 the third

01:16:06.940 time

01:16:07.240 what am I

01:16:08.720 supposed to

01:16:09.080 do

01:16:09.200 wait for

01:16:09.540 the third

01:16:09.840 time

01:16:10.120 no

01:16:10.920 he is

01:16:11.860 a bad

01:16:12.440 toxic

01:16:13.220 influence

01:16:14.100 on me

01:16:14.660 now he's

01:16:16.100 not toxic

01:16:16.720 to you

01:16:17.180 so you

01:16:17.540 should be

01:16:17.840 fans

01:16:18.240 because his

01:16:19.340 content is

01:16:19.860 very good

01:16:20.280 I'm a

01:16:21.760 big

01:16:21.980 I'm a

01:16:22.960 big believer

01:16:23.440 in his

01:16:23.880 analytical

01:16:24.340 abilities

01:16:24.980 and he

01:16:26.420 adds value

01:16:27.080 and it's

01:16:27.580 different from

01:16:28.200 what other

01:16:28.720 people are

01:16:29.080 doing

01:16:29.300 so it's

01:16:30.020 all the

01:16:30.280 notes

01:16:30.560 he does

01:16:31.220 a good

01:16:31.460 job

01:16:31.760 but

01:16:32.840 my

01:16:34.300 situation

01:16:35.340 is just

01:16:35.940 personal

01:16:36.340 and

01:16:37.820 I would

01:16:38.660 recommend

01:16:39.380 that you

01:16:39.760 be more

01:16:40.240 like me

01:16:40.920 as opposed

01:16:42.080 to try

01:16:42.440 to change

01:16:42.840 my mind

01:16:43.380 be more

01:16:44.740 like me

01:16:45.220 there's

01:16:45.940 somebody

01:16:46.220 in your

01:16:46.520 life

01:16:46.720 who's

01:16:46.980 disrespecting

01:16:47.700 you over

01:16:48.060 and over

01:16:48.360 again

01:16:48.640 you know

01:16:49.720 that right

01:16:50.140 somebody

01:16:51.380 in your

01:16:51.680 life

01:16:51.860 is

01:16:52.040 disrespecting

01:16:52.840 you over

01:16:53.240 and over

01:16:53.540 again

01:16:53.720 and you

01:16:53.920 just keep

01:16:54.300 coming

01:16:54.540 back

01:16:54.940 stop it

01:16:56.340 don't do

01:16:57.600 it

01:16:57.940 just

01:16:58.460 throw them

01:16:59.460 out of

01:16:59.640 your life

01:17:00.040 and be

01:17:00.320 done with

01:17:00.640 them

01:17:00.760 forever

01:17:01.060 there's

01:17:01.460 plenty

01:17:01.680 of

01:17:01.820 people

01:17:02.080 you don't

01:17:02.520 have to

01:17:02.780 deal with

01:17:03.180 the bad

01:17:03.460 ones

01:17:03.720 yeah

01:17:07.440 all right

01:17:09.040 will I be

01:17:11.060 visited by

01:17:11.600 three ghosts

01:17:12.200 this Christmas

01:17:12.820 good chance

01:17:13.800 worst advice

01:17:18.020 ever

01:17:18.380 oh

01:17:27.040 oh

01:17:27.080 interesting

01:17:28.040 Ruth says

01:17:29.040 I spoke

01:17:30.020 to my

01:17:30.340 doctor

01:17:30.680 and stopped

01:17:31.140 my cholesterol

01:17:31.760 med

01:17:32.080 and one

01:17:32.760 BP

01:17:33.060 med

01:17:33.380 still taking

01:17:33.940 one BP

01:17:34.360 med

01:17:34.680 feel a lot

01:17:35.620 better

01:17:35.960 there you

01:17:37.540 go

01:17:37.860 yeah

01:17:41.480 now again

01:17:42.820 don't

01:17:43.280 don't stop

01:17:43.960 taking any

01:17:44.480 drugs

01:17:44.760 because it's

01:17:45.180 something you

01:17:45.600 heard on

01:17:46.180 my live stream

01:17:46.940 that would be

01:17:47.400 a bad idea

01:17:48.000 all right

01:17:49.780 that's all for

01:17:51.060 now YouTube

01:17:51.700 I'll see you

01:17:52.680 tomorrow

01:17:52.960 bye for now

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - December 21, 2022

Episode 1964 Scott Adams： Why The Country Doesn't Agree On Vaccinations. You Won't Like It

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript