Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1965 Scott Adams： Today Is All Fake News About The Fake News. And That Means Good Sipping

00:00:00.400 The highlight of civilization.

00:00:04.060 And if you'd like to take this experience up to stratospheric levels,

00:00:11.080 or even words that you can pronounce, or I can,

00:00:14.960 all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a stein,

00:00:18.640 a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:21.700 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.

00:00:24.900 Enjoy me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine of the day,

00:00:28.080 the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:31.180 It's called Simultaneous Sip. It happens now. Go.

00:00:39.080 All right, how many of you are enjoying

00:00:43.360 the excellent economics of absolutely free cryotherapy?

00:00:51.940 Yes, how many of you can get free cryotherapy just walking outdoors right now?

00:00:56.020 Just open the door. Stand on your front step.

00:00:59.940 A little bit of free cryotherapy, yeah?

00:01:02.520 Yeah, that's right.

00:01:08.980 I just saw a comment from Erica the Excellent.

00:01:12.320 There's no way I'm going to read it.

00:01:14.500 Sorry, Erica. That one will not be shared.

00:01:17.500 I've got an image in my head now that'll never go away.

00:01:19.860 Thanks for that. Thanks for that.

00:01:23.860 Okay, I had something to do with somebody she knows who took an ice bath,

00:01:27.440 and when he was done, his nipples were six inches long. 0.83

00:01:30.900 Now, I cannot confirm or deny that that's true.

00:01:37.280 I can only tell you it was a comment I just read.

00:01:39.820 That's all I know. That's all I know.

00:01:41.640 All right, so yesterday I decided to move my live stream off of YouTube

00:01:48.380 and on to Rumble because if you're following my saga,

00:01:53.880 we know now that Twitter had a big influence by the government, the FBI,

00:02:00.840 and we know that they were doing some kind of throttling.

00:02:04.260 That's confirmed.

00:02:05.060 And you know that YouTube's, let's say,

00:02:10.280 its relationship with some creators left many questions.

00:02:15.160 So I think it was yesterday or the day before I got demonetized

00:02:19.200 without any explanation.

00:02:23.700 Now, my feed gets demonetized ordinarily,

00:02:27.660 so it's almost always demonetized.

00:02:30.480 But then we ask for a human review,

00:02:33.040 and the human almost always reverses it.

00:02:37.020 But you've already lost most of your income.

00:02:40.220 Or a big chunk.

00:02:41.700 I don't know if it's most.

00:02:43.000 But it doesn't demonetize when people are most interested in...

00:02:46.420 It doesn't monetize when people are most interested in watching it,

00:02:50.960 when it's brand new.

00:02:52.660 Like, it takes a while for them to monetize it

00:02:55.300 after the big traffic's gone.

00:02:57.560 Now, for a long time,

00:03:00.620 I gave them the benefit of the doubt.

00:03:04.100 And maybe I still do.

00:03:06.120 Which is, they have an advertising model, YouTube does,

00:03:09.580 and that they once explained to me,

00:03:12.340 personally,

00:03:13.100 so I got, you know,

00:03:14.000 YouTube's personal, official explanation

00:03:17.040 of what was happening to my account,

00:03:19.000 which is that

00:03:20.060 the advertisers don't like to advertise

00:03:23.060 on some kinds of content.

00:03:25.140 Makes sense.

00:03:25.900 And so they're really just doing

00:03:29.380 what they think the advertisers want them to do

00:03:31.640 because the advertisers are their base.

00:03:35.880 So if you just take the point of view

00:03:39.080 that all they're doing

00:03:39.980 is managing their advertising stream of income,

00:03:44.240 then what they do to me makes sense.

00:03:47.320 Like, you might disagree with it,

00:03:48.800 but it's within the realm of,

00:03:50.360 you know,

00:03:50.700 an ordinary business practice.

00:03:52.120 However,

00:03:54.800 in the context of what we've learned about Twitter

00:03:57.260 and the FBI's acknowledgement

00:03:59.860 that they work with other entities,

00:04:02.780 and also the connection between the FBI

00:04:04.860 and the Democratic Party,

00:04:07.460 I can't really treat,

00:04:08.560 I can't really treat YouTube's treatment of me

00:04:11.840 as just ad-related.

00:04:15.260 Would you agree?

00:04:16.400 I don't know what's behind it.

00:04:18.820 I mean,

00:04:19.280 I don't know the actual truth.

00:04:22.120 But within the context of what we know

00:04:24.780 literally this month,

00:04:26.880 like new information

00:04:28.080 about the government's interaction

00:04:30.400 with social media,

00:04:31.920 I have to assume that whatever YouTube does to me

00:04:34.620 is influenced by the government.

00:04:37.640 Would you agree?

00:04:39.080 It doesn't mean it's true.

00:04:40.960 I have no smoking gun,

00:04:43.160 you know,

00:04:43.360 no direct evidence,

00:04:44.400 no whistleblower,

00:04:45.900 but the pattern recognition is now so thick.

00:04:50.260 Would you agree?

00:04:51.220 Just based on pattern recognition.

00:04:53.840 There's just so much pattern here

00:04:55.980 that how could you ignore it at this point?

00:04:59.280 So no information,

00:05:01.220 no confirming information,

00:05:04.020 but what are you going to do?

00:05:05.640 Yeah,

00:05:05.900 you have to make your decision

00:05:06.900 based on your best guess, right?

00:05:09.560 Because we don't have perfect information.

00:05:11.080 So I may not be able to get up

00:05:14.680 and running on Rumble 0.82

00:05:15.740 like in 24 hours

00:05:17.480 because there's a little bit of setup involved.

00:05:20.420 But my long-term plan

00:05:22.700 will be to migrate

00:05:24.760 as much of my traffic as possible

00:05:26.940 off of YouTube

00:05:27.860 for the benefit of

00:05:30.840 just making sure the system is...

00:05:34.880 Let me put it this way.

00:05:36.040 Sometimes I feel like

00:05:39.400 I'm acting as an individual.

00:05:41.800 Sometimes I feel like

00:05:42.760 I'm acting on behalf of,

00:05:44.600 you know,

00:05:45.220 followers or supporters

00:05:46.360 who would like me to do this or that.

00:05:48.520 And sometimes I act as a pure citizen.

00:05:51.780 And when I'm acting as a pure citizen,

00:05:54.040 I'm acting as part of the free market

00:05:55.820 to do, you know,

00:05:57.640 what free people in a free market do

00:05:59.920 because I think that's good in the long run.

00:06:02.640 And what I think is good

00:06:04.000 for the system right now

00:06:05.340 is that people like me

00:06:07.340 leave YouTube

00:06:08.920 unless we can get more visibility, right?

00:06:12.560 All I'm asking is a little more visibility

00:06:14.440 on the situation,

00:06:15.840 but I don't think they can...

00:06:17.280 I don't think it's in their interest

00:06:18.680 to give it to me.

00:06:20.260 And I don't think it's going to happen.

00:06:22.340 So I'm just going to exercise

00:06:23.580 my free market

00:06:24.840 citizen responsibility

00:06:28.000 to go where I know

00:06:29.940 this won't be a problem.

00:06:31.880 So at Rumble,

00:06:32.540 I won't have any of this.

00:06:33.540 I'll bet there'll be

00:06:34.700 zero demonetization on Rumble.

00:06:38.760 Would you agree?

00:06:39.820 I'll bet zero times

00:06:40.960 I'll be demonetized.

00:06:42.660 And you know what's interesting about that?

00:06:45.220 Rumble also uses ads

00:06:47.200 to make money.

00:06:50.120 So if Rumble decides

00:06:51.580 that they don't need to demonetize me

00:06:53.380 and they can still sell ads,

00:06:55.540 well, then you might have

00:06:56.560 a little question

00:06:57.260 about why YouTube

00:06:59.120 thinks the opposite.

00:07:01.000 Now, it could be

00:07:01.640 that YouTube is right,

00:07:02.880 that they make more money

00:07:04.140 by being better

00:07:05.760 to their advertisers

00:07:06.620 and maybe the people

00:07:08.780 who advertise at Rumble

00:07:09.740 know exactly what they're getting

00:07:11.760 and might even get

00:07:13.520 a better deal.

00:07:14.640 Maybe it's more...

00:07:15.640 They might get more attention

00:07:16.680 per dollar on Rumble

00:07:19.140 so they know exactly

00:07:20.100 what they're getting.

00:07:21.000 So I'm going to let

00:07:21.640 the free market work this out

00:07:23.100 because as an individual,

00:07:24.920 I can't figure out

00:07:26.000 what's going on with YouTube

00:07:27.260 and I don't think

00:07:28.560 there are any buttons

00:07:29.160 for me to push

00:07:29.880 to get my answers, right?

00:07:31.740 So unless Elon Musk

00:07:33.080 buys YouTube,

00:07:34.080 which is not going to happen,

00:07:36.540 how would I ever know?

00:07:37.820 So I just have to do

00:07:38.700 what the free market

00:07:39.420 tells me to do.

00:07:40.660 So that's what's behind it, right?

00:07:42.800 This is not some big...

00:07:45.040 I'm not going on a hunger strike.

00:07:47.120 I'm just doing the normal thing

00:07:48.680 a citizen would do

00:07:49.700 in a realm of uncertainty.

00:07:53.560 I'll just let the free market

00:07:54.620 work it out.

00:07:55.520 If YouTube wants to lose

00:07:56.840 people like me

00:07:57.560 on an ongoing basis,

00:08:00.280 maybe it makes no difference

00:08:01.500 to them

00:08:01.860 and then everybody's happy.

00:08:04.260 But if it does make

00:08:05.040 a difference to them,

00:08:05.860 then the system is working.

00:08:08.100 It's doing what it's supposed to do.

00:08:10.740 All right, Elon Musk tweeted

00:08:12.380 about this Omnibus bill.

00:08:14.780 You know what the government does,

00:08:16.060 how they launder their vote?

00:08:17.760 So if you don't know exactly

00:08:20.640 what this big Omnibus stuff is about,

00:08:23.880 here's the quick explanation.

00:08:26.560 If Congress said,

00:08:27.920 hey, here's a very specific

00:08:30.220 spending bill,

00:08:31.900 what do you think, everybody?

00:08:33.460 Some people would be for it,

00:08:35.080 some would be against it.

00:08:36.840 And then their voters would say,

00:08:38.400 wait a minute,

00:08:39.420 even though I like you

00:08:40.380 as my representative,

00:08:42.000 I wish you hadn't voted

00:08:43.340 the way you did

00:08:43.880 on that one thing.

00:08:45.260 So now this politician

00:08:46.760 loses some people

00:08:49.400 because of that vote,

00:08:51.280 but probably didn't gain anybody.

00:08:53.840 Right?

00:08:54.140 It's just all downside.

00:08:55.780 So every time a politician

00:08:57.320 votes on a specific bill

00:08:59.180 that everybody knows

00:09:00.880 what that is,

00:09:01.500 oh, I know exactly

00:09:02.500 what that bill is all about,

00:09:04.060 that's bad for the politician. 0.99

00:09:06.960 Is that the worst situation

00:09:08.840 you've ever seen?

00:09:09.520 Like, actually voting

00:09:11.180 in a clear way

00:09:12.360 for a very specific thing,

00:09:14.300 no matter what it is,

00:09:15.920 is bad for the politician.

00:09:18.060 Because people aren't

00:09:18.760 going to like them better,

00:09:20.140 but they're going to have

00:09:20.980 a reason to dislike them.

00:09:23.160 Right?

00:09:23.640 So the way that Congress

00:09:26.260 solves this

00:09:27.060 is that they all collude,

00:09:29.220 and that's what it is,

00:09:30.220 they collude against

00:09:31.180 the citizens.

00:09:36.840 And the way they do it is

00:09:38.640 they agree to throw

00:09:40.100 all of their crap

00:09:41.180 that they don't want

00:09:42.220 to be responsible for

00:09:43.360 into one gigantic

00:09:45.380 Frankenstein bill

00:09:47.220 that if you pile up the pages,

00:09:49.700 it's literally, I don't know,

00:09:51.420 two feet tall or something.

00:09:52.580 It's like a big pile.

00:09:54.580 So this is what this does.

00:09:55.900 It guarantees that

00:09:56.820 nobody in Congress

00:09:57.640 can read it.

00:09:58.800 It's too big.

00:09:59.960 It guarantees that

00:10:01.260 no citizen can read it.

00:10:03.580 It guarantees that

00:10:04.560 no reporter can read it.

00:10:07.080 So it removes

00:10:07.880 all the information

00:10:08.660 about the connection

00:10:10.440 between the politicians

00:10:11.520 and what they support.

00:10:13.540 And they do that

00:10:14.380 so that you can't have

00:10:15.320 a reason to be mad at them.

00:10:17.380 And the downside

00:10:18.700 is that we are

00:10:20.840 an unmanaged country.

00:10:22.580 Let me be as clear

00:10:25.560 about this as possible.

00:10:27.400 I'm not saying

00:10:28.460 that Congress

00:10:29.040 is making bad decisions.

00:10:32.480 Do you understand

00:10:33.440 the difference?

00:10:34.580 I'm not saying

00:10:35.440 that Congress

00:10:35.880 is making good decisions.

00:10:38.160 And I'm not saying

00:10:38.880 they're making bad decisions.

00:10:40.820 What I'm saying is

00:10:41.980 they've abandoned their jobs.

00:10:44.880 They just abandoned their jobs.

00:10:46.440 They were hired

00:10:46.980 to make decisions

00:10:47.780 and they found a way

00:10:49.260 to not do it.

00:10:49.960 They found a way

00:10:51.460 just to throw

00:10:52.000 everything in the same bag

00:10:54.700 and hide

00:10:55.220 who's responsible.

00:10:57.840 So the most basic function

00:10:59.660 of government

00:11:00.500 is to make decisions

00:11:02.460 on your behalf

00:11:03.320 and then we the people

00:11:05.220 get to see what they did

00:11:06.320 and then we get to say,

00:11:08.000 okay,

00:11:08.900 I'd like a little more

00:11:09.880 of that politician

00:11:10.640 or I'd like a little less of them.

00:11:12.800 The politicians

00:11:13.600 have found a way

00:11:14.540 to remove

00:11:15.860 public scrutiny

00:11:17.500 from their jobs.

00:11:20.100 That's not doing

00:11:20.980 a good job

00:11:21.660 or a bad job.

00:11:23.300 Do you get that?

00:11:24.640 You cannot say

00:11:25.560 that Congress

00:11:26.020 is doing a bad job

00:11:27.180 because they're not

00:11:28.260 doing the job.

00:11:29.900 That's not the job.

00:11:31.920 Who exactly hired them

00:11:33.280 to do that?

00:11:34.300 Who hired them

00:11:35.080 to hide their vote

00:11:36.460 behind an omnibus?

00:11:38.680 Exactly zero people.

00:11:40.220 They're not working

00:11:40.920 for their state.

00:11:42.080 They're not working

00:11:42.680 for their constituents.

00:11:44.360 They're not even working

00:11:45.380 for their lobbyists.

00:11:48.820 I mean,

00:11:49.020 think about it.

00:11:49.820 It's not even

00:11:50.460 for the lobbyists.

00:11:51.560 It's not for anybody.

00:11:52.800 It's literally

00:11:53.540 just to hide

00:11:54.240 their responsibility.

00:11:56.900 Who else

00:11:57.580 could do that?

00:11:59.040 Imagine a private business

00:12:00.500 where the employees

00:12:02.080 never had to be

00:12:03.720 responsible to the boss

00:12:04.980 because they could

00:12:05.980 just hide their

00:12:06.720 bad behavior

00:12:07.540 in something complicated.

00:12:08.600 Do you know

00:12:09.740 what that's called?

00:12:11.300 Most big businesses.

00:12:13.160 Because in most cases

00:12:14.280 the CEO

00:12:14.880 doesn't know

00:12:16.120 what's going on.

00:12:17.900 Look at Russia. 0.82

00:12:19.440 Do you think

00:12:20.000 Russia got in 0.96

00:12:20.820 any trouble

00:12:21.360 because Putin

00:12:23.860 did not have

00:12:24.660 visibility about

00:12:25.600 the actual quality

00:12:26.640 of his own military?

00:12:28.560 Do you think

00:12:28.960 that caused 0.77

00:12:29.400 any problems

00:12:30.060 for Russia?

00:12:31.100 Yeah.

00:12:31.540 It destroyed

00:12:32.080 their whole

00:12:32.540 fucking country.

00:12:34.240 Their whole country

00:12:35.240 is going down

00:12:36.360 the shitter

00:12:36.880 because

00:12:38.080 they had

00:12:39.220 no visibility.

00:12:40.340 The boss

00:12:41.020 Putin

00:12:41.800 had no visibility

00:12:42.780 of his most

00:12:44.000 important asset

00:12:44.720 his military.

00:12:45.740 No visibility.

00:12:48.180 That's what

00:12:48.800 your congress

00:12:49.320 did to you.

00:12:50.520 Same thing.

00:12:51.500 So the thing

00:12:52.300 that's crushing

00:12:53.100 Russia

00:12:53.700 is that the boss

00:12:55.300 couldn't tell

00:12:55.760 what was going on.

00:12:57.400 Would you agree?

00:12:58.500 That was the problem.

00:12:59.460 The boss

00:12:59.780 didn't know

00:13:00.140 what was going on.

00:13:03.320 FTX says that too

00:13:04.380 but I don't think

00:13:04.920 that's true

00:13:05.260 in that case.

00:13:07.020 All right.

00:13:08.540 So I think

00:13:10.200 the news

00:13:10.960 and the pundits

00:13:12.060 are getting

00:13:12.480 this whole

00:13:13.180 congress

00:13:13.720 omnibus thing

00:13:14.660 completely wrong

00:13:15.420 because they're

00:13:16.580 treating it

00:13:17.040 like they're

00:13:17.380 doing a bad job.

00:13:19.340 That's the wrong

00:13:20.140 story.

00:13:21.400 Congress decided

00:13:22.200 not to do

00:13:22.740 any job.

00:13:24.660 They're not

00:13:25.240 doing a bad job.

00:13:26.060 They're not

00:13:26.280 doing any job.

00:13:27.860 Nobody's job.

00:13:29.220 If they're not

00:13:29.760 deciding what

00:13:30.360 to spend money

00:13:31.060 on and what

00:13:31.520 not to,

00:13:32.660 that's not

00:13:33.380 anything.

00:13:34.860 Am I right?

00:13:36.680 Am I off base

00:13:37.660 here?

00:13:38.140 This is not a case

00:13:39.140 of good or bad.

00:13:39.860 They're simply

00:13:40.280 not doing it.

00:13:42.600 And they found

00:13:43.400 a way to make

00:13:43.960 it look like,

00:13:44.940 oh, we did

00:13:45.420 something while

00:13:46.180 obviously not

00:13:47.360 doing anything.

00:13:48.400 Because just

00:13:49.080 saying yes to

00:13:49.740 everything that

00:13:50.380 anybody asks for

00:13:51.300 is the opposite

00:13:52.460 of managing.

00:13:54.680 And how often

00:13:55.620 have I said

00:13:56.080 that which is

00:13:56.820 not measured

00:13:57.540 is not managed?

00:14:00.160 Have I said

00:14:00.940 that too many

00:14:02.860 That which is

00:14:03.540 not measured

00:14:04.340 is not managed

00:14:06.080 by definition.

00:14:07.840 Because management

00:14:08.460 means I'll make

00:14:09.960 some changes

00:14:10.660 and I'm measuring

00:14:12.060 how things used

00:14:12.780 to be and

00:14:13.320 then I'll see

00:14:13.700 if my change

00:14:14.500 I can measure

00:14:15.880 to show that

00:14:16.520 it's made things

00:14:17.280 better or worse.

00:14:18.420 That's managing.

00:14:19.200 If you're not

00:14:21.120 measuring,

00:14:21.720 you're not managing.

00:14:23.040 So we have a

00:14:23.620 government we

00:14:25.120 hired to manage

00:14:26.000 who tells us

00:14:27.440 directly,

00:14:28.860 oh, instead

00:14:29.520 of doing what

00:14:30.140 you hired me

00:14:30.700 to do,

00:14:31.460 managing things

00:14:32.400 and then see

00:14:32.840 how they went,

00:14:33.800 I'm going to

00:14:34.420 hide all the

00:14:35.500 information from

00:14:36.240 you, my bosses,

00:14:37.740 the public.

00:14:38.680 And then I'll

00:14:39.320 just take a

00:14:39.820 holiday and

00:14:40.960 not have to

00:14:41.480 do my work.

00:14:44.300 Why do we

00:14:44.940 pay them?

00:14:47.220 Why do we

00:14:47.840 pay them?

00:14:48.900 Here's what I

00:14:49.640 suggest.

00:14:50.760 I think the

00:14:51.360 citizens should

00:14:52.760 push for

00:14:53.520 whatever it

00:14:54.340 takes,

00:14:54.660 constitutional

00:14:55.440 amendment or

00:14:56.300 whatever,

00:14:57.320 to require that

00:14:58.240 any time that

00:14:59.140 Congress passes

00:15:00.160 an omnibus bill

00:15:01.320 that we don't

00:15:02.740 pay them.

00:15:04.940 We still,

00:15:05.680 maybe we have

00:15:06.180 to run the

00:15:06.580 country so they

00:15:07.420 got to pay,

00:15:08.080 but we just

00:15:08.900 don't pay them

00:15:09.560 because that

00:15:10.620 would be a

00:15:11.000 confession that

00:15:11.680 they can't do

00:15:12.200 their job and

00:15:13.380 I don't know

00:15:13.800 why you'd pay

00:15:14.280 somebody who

00:15:14.920 confesses they're

00:15:15.720 not going to

00:15:16.080 do their job.

00:15:17.420 It'd be one

00:15:17.960 thing if you

00:15:18.720 weren't sure

00:15:19.300 they were doing

00:15:19.860 their job,

00:15:21.140 but if they

00:15:21.620 tell you directly

00:15:22.400 we're going to

00:15:23.480 use an omnibus

00:15:24.460 instead of

00:15:25.160 work,

00:15:26.280 why would

00:15:27.840 you pay

00:15:28.080 them?

00:15:29.380 So,

00:15:30.440 I mean,

00:15:30.920 even though I

00:15:31.600 assume there's

00:15:32.080 no way to

00:15:32.600 succeed,

00:15:33.680 don't you think

00:15:34.160 the government

00:15:34.680 or that the

00:15:35.540 citizens need

00:15:36.260 to push back

00:15:36.900 in a specific

00:15:37.540 way?

00:15:38.780 In a specific

00:15:39.660 way would be

00:15:40.520 let's tie your 0.99

00:15:42.720 performance to

00:15:43.780 your actions.

00:15:45.860 And we

00:15:46.740 should not

00:15:48.180 tie their

00:15:49.920 pay to

00:15:50.500 whether we

00:15:50.880 like what

00:15:51.540 they do or

00:15:52.060 not.

00:15:52.860 That's different.

00:15:53.480 I'm not

00:15:54.420 saying that

00:15:54.960 you give

00:15:55.360 them a

00:15:56.160 cut in

00:15:56.460 pay if

00:15:56.880 they pass

00:15:57.280 the law

00:15:57.620 you don't

00:15:57.920 like.

00:15:58.780 Nothing

00:15:59.040 like that.

00:16:00.180 That's just

00:16:00.740 what voting

00:16:01.260 is for,

00:16:01.760 right?

00:16:02.200 Vote them

00:16:02.660 in,

00:16:02.940 vote them

00:16:03.240 out.

00:16:03.840 So that's

00:16:04.260 how you

00:16:04.520 rate them

00:16:04.880 on their

00:16:05.160 individual

00:16:05.640 decisions.

00:16:07.180 But I'm

00:16:07.640 saying that

00:16:08.300 we should

00:16:08.820 not pay

00:16:09.180 anybody who

00:16:09.840 says to

00:16:10.320 you directly,

00:16:11.660 thanks for

00:16:12.620 hiring me,

00:16:13.840 I'm not

00:16:14.320 going to do

00:16:14.680 the thing

00:16:15.000 you hired

00:16:15.340 me for.

00:16:16.440 I'm just

00:16:17.020 going to

00:16:17.220 throw it

00:16:17.600 in an

00:16:17.880 omnibus

00:16:18.480 and go

00:16:19.660 on vacation

00:16:20.260 and go

00:16:20.760 home and

00:16:21.120 see the

00:16:21.380 kids.

00:16:23.180 Seriously,

00:16:23.740 why are we

00:16:24.100 paying them?

00:16:24.780 And this

00:16:25.240 is a question

00:16:25.700 I think

00:16:26.020 should be

00:16:26.320 asked.

00:16:27.480 I saw

00:16:27.900 somebody

00:16:28.180 ask Chuck

00:16:28.860 Schumer,

00:16:29.800 why do you

00:16:30.820 think this

00:16:31.240 is good

00:16:31.680 to do it

00:16:32.380 this way

00:16:32.840 when nobody

00:16:33.840 has time

00:16:34.220 to read

00:16:34.560 the bill

00:16:34.960 and it's

00:16:35.960 obviously

00:16:36.320 full of

00:16:36.760 pork and

00:16:37.140 stuff.

00:16:38.020 And as

00:16:39.100 Schumer says,

00:16:40.280 oh,

00:16:40.780 you know,

00:16:41.440 the people

00:16:41.900 who put it

00:16:42.320 together know

00:16:42.920 what's in

00:16:43.260 it.

00:16:44.300 So it's

00:16:44.840 not important

00:16:45.660 that the

00:16:45.960 people who

00:16:46.320 vote for

00:16:46.840 it know

00:16:48.260 it's in

00:16:48.540 it.

00:16:48.860 The people

00:16:49.300 who put it

00:16:49.700 together

00:16:50.040 worked very

00:16:50.680 hard and

00:16:51.140 very long.

00:16:52.520 And so the

00:16:52.920 committee that

00:16:53.440 put it all

00:16:53.840 together knows

00:16:54.420 exactly what's

00:16:55.120 in there.

00:16:55.680 So don't

00:16:56.120 worry.

00:16:58.260 Here's the

00:16:58.800 question that

00:16:59.300 should have

00:16:59.560 been asked.

00:17:00.860 Why should

00:17:01.300 we pay you

00:17:01.860 Chuck Schumer?

00:17:03.520 Like actually

00:17:04.100 that question.

00:17:05.440 You know,

00:17:05.760 the public

00:17:06.540 has hired you

00:17:07.880 to do a

00:17:08.320 job.

00:17:09.700 I think you

00:17:10.300 would agree

00:17:10.640 that the

00:17:11.040 omnibus allows

00:17:12.100 you to avoid

00:17:12.840 doing the

00:17:13.240 job of

00:17:14.460 deciding what

00:17:15.060 to fund

00:17:16.140 and what

00:17:16.420 not.

00:17:17.320 So honest

00:17:18.580 question,

00:17:19.780 why should

00:17:20.240 the public

00:17:20.580 pay you?

00:17:22.120 Now,

00:17:22.720 I also

00:17:23.260 wonder,

00:17:23.940 could a

00:17:24.220 president do

00:17:24.740 an executive

00:17:25.280 order to

00:17:25.840 withhold their

00:17:26.360 pay until

00:17:27.300 they do

00:17:27.660 their job?

00:17:31.660 Legally,

00:17:32.260 I'm sure,

00:17:32.660 no,

00:17:33.020 right?

00:17:33.380 Legally,

00:17:33.940 no.

00:17:34.820 But is there

00:17:35.380 any way that

00:17:35.880 they could

00:17:36.200 game the

00:17:36.660 system by

00:17:37.760 having control

00:17:38.560 over who

00:17:39.580 cuts the

00:17:40.000 checks?

00:17:41.420 Does the

00:17:41.720 president,

00:17:42.020 let me ask

00:17:42.500 this,

00:17:42.640 who controls

00:17:44.300 the actual

00:17:45.440 check,

00:17:46.620 the issuing

00:17:47.380 of the

00:17:48.600 digital or

00:17:49.280 physical

00:17:49.680 check to

00:17:50.860 Congress?

00:17:51.340 Who controls

00:17:51.840 that?

00:17:52.140 Congress

00:17:52.440 themselves?

00:17:54.580 The GSA,

00:17:55.640 somebody says,

00:17:56.560 and the

00:17:56.900 GSA would be

00:17:57.700 controlled by

00:17:58.660 the OMB,

00:18:02.440 which would be

00:18:02.940 controlled by,

00:18:05.080 I thought that

00:18:06.680 was the

00:18:06.920 executive branch.

00:18:07.660 all right,

00:18:09.140 we'll look

00:18:09.480 into it,

00:18:10.000 but my

00:18:10.680 guess is that

00:18:11.320 the executive

00:18:11.800 branch has

00:18:12.420 something to

00:18:12.900 do with

00:18:13.180 payroll.

00:18:14.900 Am I

00:18:15.460 wrong about

00:18:15.880 that?

00:18:16.320 That would

00:18:16.660 be the

00:18:16.900 obvious way

00:18:17.380 to do it.

00:18:18.040 I wouldn't

00:18:18.440 put Congress

00:18:19.080 in charge of

00:18:19.980 the payrolls,

00:18:20.660 would you?

00:18:23.040 That doesn't

00:18:23.520 make sense.

00:18:24.420 You're saying

00:18:24.740 the House is in

00:18:25.460 charge of

00:18:25.900 payroll?

00:18:26.300 I mean,

00:18:28.140 it could be.

00:18:29.880 I don't know,

00:18:30.340 I feel like the

00:18:30.880 executive branch has

00:18:31.880 at least some

00:18:33.460 part of government

00:18:34.180 they could lean

00:18:34.860 on to stop

00:18:36.200 checks from

00:18:36.780 being issued.

00:18:38.680 Just to,

00:18:39.400 really just to

00:18:40.180 raise it as an

00:18:40.760 issue.

00:18:41.300 Now, I think

00:18:41.740 Congress probably

00:18:42.520 needs to get

00:18:43.000 paid, right?

00:18:43.820 But I feel

00:18:45.400 to raise the

00:18:46.680 issue would be

00:18:47.320 useful, but I

00:18:48.540 don't think any

00:18:49.060 Republican wants

00:18:49.860 to do it either

00:18:50.440 for the same

00:18:52.680 reason.

00:18:53.780 All right,

00:18:54.800 what do you

00:18:55.860 think of Elon

00:18:56.480 Musk weighing in 0.99

00:18:57.320 on this?

00:18:58.180 He ran a

00:18:59.240 Twitter poll,

00:19:00.760 and what

00:19:02.660 percentage of

00:19:03.340 people, and

00:19:03.820 it's very

00:19:04.200 unscientific,

00:19:04.860 of course.

00:19:05.500 You all know

00:19:06.000 a Twitter poll

00:19:06.540 is not

00:19:06.940 scientific.

00:19:08.220 But what

00:19:09.140 percentage of

00:19:09.760 people thought

00:19:10.480 the omnibus

00:19:11.260 was maybe

00:19:12.260 a good deal?

00:19:14.640 Oh, very

00:19:15.300 good guess,

00:19:15.800 yeah, roughly

00:19:16.400 a quarter,

00:19:17.740 roughly a

00:19:18.260 quarter, 28%,

00:19:19.260 but right

00:19:20.580 around a

00:19:20.900 quarter.

00:19:23.220 And do

00:19:24.720 you think that

00:19:25.220 it was

00:19:25.440 appropriate for

00:19:27.280 Musk to run

00:19:28.180 a Twitter poll,

00:19:29.660 which you know

00:19:30.200 is unscientific,

00:19:31.180 and then use

00:19:31.700 it to, you

00:19:33.080 know, promote

00:19:33.580 his opinions

00:19:34.160 about government

00:19:35.100 stuff.

00:19:37.280 Yeah, the

00:19:38.800 reason that I

00:19:39.780 think it's

00:19:40.140 appropriate,

00:19:41.480 number one,

00:19:42.120 he owns

00:19:42.480 Twitter, so

00:19:43.600 using his own

00:19:44.900 asset, of

00:19:45.600 course.

00:19:46.500 And number

00:19:47.000 two, everybody

00:19:48.120 understands a

00:19:48.900 Twitter poll is

00:19:49.540 not a real

00:19:50.160 poll, right?

00:19:51.780 We all know

00:19:52.600 that, right?

00:19:53.400 Is there

00:19:53.680 anybody who

00:19:54.040 would be

00:19:54.300 confused by

00:19:54.880 that?

00:19:55.740 I suppose,

00:19:56.300 maybe.

00:20:03.140 Yeah.

00:20:04.000 Oh, I

00:20:04.640 don't mind.

00:20:05.280 As long as,

00:20:06.140 to me, that

00:20:06.700 looks fully

00:20:07.240 transparent.

00:20:08.120 He's telling

00:20:08.520 you his

00:20:08.800 opinion, he's

00:20:09.800 showing you

00:20:10.160 the poll,

00:20:11.200 the poll is

00:20:12.200 not scientific,

00:20:13.320 but don't you

00:20:14.020 think any

00:20:14.420 scientific poll

00:20:15.280 would have

00:20:15.700 the same

00:20:16.040 result?

00:20:18.620 Let me ask

00:20:19.380 you, if

00:20:20.120 Rasmussen or

00:20:21.040 Gallup or

00:20:21.800 somebody else

00:20:22.440 did the same

00:20:23.180 poll, do you

00:20:24.540 think we

00:20:24.880 would find

00:20:25.260 out, oh,

00:20:25.760 people love

00:20:26.540 an omnibus

00:20:27.980 bill?

00:20:29.820 So, this

00:20:30.660 very special

00:20:31.740 case, the

00:20:33.340 fact that the

00:20:33.940 Twitter poll is

00:20:34.620 unscientific,

00:20:35.820 doesn't really

00:20:36.720 change anything.

00:20:37.740 It's a very

00:20:38.480 special case,

00:20:39.620 because nobody

00:20:40.600 believes that

00:20:41.620 any other poll

00:20:42.280 would give them

00:20:42.800 a different

00:20:43.140 result.

00:20:43.720 Am I right?

00:20:44.640 Does anybody

00:20:45.200 think a

00:20:45.660 different poll,

00:20:46.780 done more

00:20:47.280 scientifically,

00:20:48.380 or scientifically

00:20:49.040 at all,

00:20:50.060 does anybody

00:20:50.620 believe it

00:20:51.060 would have

00:20:51.240 been a

00:20:51.480 different

00:20:51.680 outcome?

00:20:52.920 We all

00:20:53.320 know it

00:20:53.620 would have

00:20:53.780 been the

00:20:54.000 same,

00:20:54.280 right?

00:20:55.000 Roughly

00:20:55.520 75% would

00:20:57.580 say an

00:20:58.100 omnibus

00:20:58.620 bill is

00:20:59.180 a bad

00:20:59.720 idea for

00:21:00.160 the

00:21:00.280 public.

00:21:04.180 Can we

00:21:08.460 talk about

00:21:08.880 excess deaths

00:21:09.780 after the

00:21:10.340 pandemic?

00:21:11.740 Would you

00:21:12.240 agree that

00:21:12.760 this is not

00:21:13.240 about the

00:21:13.580 pandemic,

00:21:14.160 but it's

00:21:14.420 about how

00:21:14.820 to look

00:21:15.700 at data?

00:21:17.120 So, the

00:21:17.500 thing that I

00:21:17.980 like to do

00:21:19.880 more than

00:21:20.340 anything with

00:21:21.240 my live

00:21:21.660 stream is

00:21:23.560 talk about

00:21:24.440 how we

00:21:24.980 consumers

00:21:25.480 of news

00:21:26.260 can do

00:21:27.220 a better

00:21:27.480 job of

00:21:28.020 understanding

00:21:28.580 the news

00:21:29.100 and what's

00:21:29.660 true and

00:21:30.060 what's

00:21:30.260 not.

00:21:31.180 So, the

00:21:31.640 context that

00:21:32.480 I'm going to

00:21:32.760 give you

00:21:33.040 next is

00:21:34.060 always about

00:21:34.760 how to

00:21:35.500 understand the

00:21:36.120 news.

00:21:36.420 If it

00:21:38.300 sounds like

00:21:38.760 I'm pro

00:21:39.300 or anti

00:21:39.880 some pandemic

00:21:40.700 thing,

00:21:41.280 that's not

00:21:42.160 the topic

00:21:42.600 today,

00:21:43.280 right?

00:21:43.940 And I've

00:21:44.680 got a few

00:21:45.060 new things

00:21:45.540 to throw

00:21:45.920 into this

00:21:46.320 that you

00:21:46.500 haven't heard

00:21:46.840 before,

00:21:47.620 surprisingly.

00:21:48.140 So, I

00:21:50.960 think everybody

00:21:51.500 agrees that

00:21:52.100 there are

00:21:52.380 excess

00:21:52.800 deaths.

00:21:54.600 Can you

00:21:55.340 give me a

00:21:55.860 fact check?

00:21:56.820 Everybody

00:21:57.380 agrees there

00:21:57.940 are excess

00:21:58.660 deaths since

00:22:00.380 the summer

00:22:02.060 of 2021,

00:22:03.180 about the

00:22:03.740 same time

00:22:04.280 that vaccinations

00:22:05.720 were rolled

00:22:06.560 out, so-called

00:22:07.460 vaccinations.

00:22:09.240 And does

00:22:10.240 everybody agree

00:22:10.960 that the data

00:22:13.120 seems to show

00:22:14.020 that around

00:22:15.640 the time

00:22:16.140 of the

00:22:16.360 vaccinations,

00:22:17.800 the excess

00:22:18.920 deaths started

00:22:19.540 to skyrocket?

00:22:20.880 Everybody?

00:22:21.680 I think that's

00:22:22.260 true, right?

00:22:24.620 Now, have

00:22:26.980 the number

00:22:27.400 of cancers,

00:22:29.440 deaths,

00:22:30.380 deaths by

00:22:31.260 cancer,

00:22:31.780 have they

00:22:32.180 increased

00:22:32.720 because the

00:22:33.940 pandemic caused

00:22:35.140 people to

00:22:35.800 delay treatment?

00:22:37.580 Yes or

00:22:38.060 no?

00:22:40.500 The surprising

00:22:41.680 answer is it

00:22:42.720 made no

00:22:43.100 difference.

00:22:45.020 Now, according

00:22:45.980 to some

00:22:46.600 government

00:22:47.040 officials I

00:22:47.680 saw today,

00:22:48.560 government

00:22:49.100 numbers, there

00:22:51.260 was definitely

00:22:51.920 an increase in

00:22:53.300 heart attacks,

00:22:54.280 so heart-related

00:22:55.020 problems.

00:22:55.820 So heart-related

00:22:56.840 problems definitely

00:22:57.720 went up, and

00:22:59.000 the beginning was

00:22:59.880 definitely about

00:23:00.760 the time of

00:23:01.620 the shots

00:23:03.240 coming through.

00:23:03.820 Not because

00:23:04.320 of, not

00:23:05.520 because of

00:23:06.160 necessarily,

00:23:07.300 that's what

00:23:07.660 we're going to

00:23:07.960 talk about,

00:23:08.620 but about the

00:23:09.220 same time.

00:23:10.580 Now, did

00:23:12.280 you know

00:23:12.580 that?

00:23:12.840 Did your

00:23:14.000 news source

00:23:14.640 tell you that

00:23:16.480 the government's

00:23:17.260 official numbers

00:23:18.080 do confirm

00:23:18.960 their excess

00:23:19.560 deaths, but

00:23:20.660 they're not in

00:23:21.140 the cancer

00:23:21.540 category?

00:23:22.680 The cancer

00:23:23.180 deaths are

00:23:23.620 right on

00:23:24.000 baseline.

00:23:25.420 So it

00:23:25.960 turns out that

00:23:26.520 whole narrative

00:23:27.060 about delaying

00:23:28.380 cancer treatment

00:23:29.300 was almost,

00:23:31.000 not almost,

00:23:32.080 was certainly

00:23:32.840 true for

00:23:33.760 individuals,

00:23:35.420 meaning that

00:23:36.080 definitely there

00:23:37.120 are anecdotes

00:23:37.700 of people who

00:23:38.220 delayed treatment

00:23:38.900 and it

00:23:39.060 probably made

00:23:39.480 a difference.

00:23:40.260 But overall,

00:23:42.400 it's about the

00:23:43.140 same.

00:23:44.560 Now, so that

00:23:45.620 would indicate

00:23:46.440 that whatever's

00:23:47.440 happening was

00:23:48.800 more heart

00:23:49.340 related, right?

00:23:51.300 And I know

00:23:52.140 some of you

00:23:52.600 are going to

00:23:52.780 have to check

00:23:53.220 that fact.

00:23:54.560 So go check

00:23:55.320 that fact and

00:23:56.740 see if the

00:23:57.240 cancer deaths

00:23:57.920 do look kind

00:23:58.720 of flat.

00:23:59.240 If that's

00:23:59.680 true, then

00:24:01.360 that could at

00:24:02.020 least help our

00:24:02.820 mystery, right?

00:24:03.560 So now our

00:24:04.860 mystery could

00:24:05.480 be more

00:24:06.480 focused on

00:24:07.700 heart related

00:24:08.360 things, which

00:24:09.180 definitely went

00:24:09.880 up, definitely

00:24:11.160 went up.

00:24:12.220 And I believe

00:24:12.980 the country is

00:24:13.660 now largely

00:24:14.480 agreed that

00:24:15.880 young people

00:24:16.540 were worse

00:24:17.140 off, young

00:24:18.060 males, were 0.99

00:24:19.240 worse off with

00:24:20.000 a shot.

00:24:21.760 Is that now

00:24:22.860 believed by

00:24:24.640 everybody?

00:24:27.160 As far as I

00:24:28.120 know, every,

00:24:28.620 every, all data

00:24:29.600 shows the same

00:24:30.220 thing, right?

00:24:31.840 I need a

00:24:33.180 fact check on

00:24:33.740 that.

00:24:35.960 All right, I

00:24:36.540 think that's a

00:24:37.020 yes.

00:24:37.700 So there's still

00:24:38.500 a lot of

00:24:38.800 mystery, right?

00:24:39.500 So here's what

00:24:40.180 I'm going to

00:24:40.520 toss into the

00:24:41.220 mystery.

00:24:42.260 Here are other

00:24:43.200 reasons that

00:24:45.740 death rate by

00:24:47.440 heart attack

00:24:48.180 would spike at

00:24:49.720 the same time

00:24:50.460 as the

00:24:52.640 vaccinations

00:24:53.180 were rolled

00:24:53.720 out.

00:24:54.960 All right,

00:24:55.200 reason number

00:24:55.860 one, the

00:24:58.200 people who

00:24:58.600 make the

00:24:58.960 vaccinations

00:24:59.560 admitted because

00:25:01.360 we know

00:25:01.740 this is always

00:25:02.300 true, there

00:25:03.480 should be

00:25:04.120 side effects

00:25:04.920 from vaccinations.

00:25:07.180 Would everybody

00:25:07.760 agree that even

00:25:08.580 the people who

00:25:09.180 made the

00:25:09.540 vaccinations

00:25:10.040 said, yes,

00:25:11.420 there's some

00:25:11.960 amount of

00:25:12.500 adverse effects?

00:25:14.140 So some

00:25:14.800 portion of

00:25:15.560 the uptick,

00:25:17.220 you could say

00:25:17.880 for sure, was

00:25:19.380 related to

00:25:20.240 adverse effects.

00:25:22.040 So far,

00:25:22.660 everybody on

00:25:23.100 the same page?

00:25:24.440 Some percentage,

00:25:26.820 everybody would

00:25:27.560 agree, including

00:25:28.420 the people who

00:25:28.960 made them,

00:25:29.340 that there

00:25:30.540 would be some

00:25:31.060 extra negative

00:25:32.240 effects.

00:25:33.020 We don't know

00:25:33.840 yet whether

00:25:36.260 the benefits

00:25:37.460 outweigh the

00:25:38.700 opposite, but

00:25:41.340 you should see

00:25:41.980 some more

00:25:42.340 heart attacks.

00:25:43.360 That would be

00:25:43.840 the normal

00:25:44.260 thing you

00:25:44.620 should expect

00:25:45.060 to see.

00:25:45.620 But we

00:25:46.000 don't know

00:25:46.280 how much,

00:25:47.000 right?

00:25:47.360 There's still

00:25:47.740 a how much

00:25:48.160 question.

00:25:49.780 All right,

00:25:50.240 here are some

00:25:50.840 other things

00:25:51.280 you would

00:25:51.500 expect.

00:25:51.860 Do you

00:25:53.380 think that

00:25:53.760 the pandemic

00:25:54.380 lowered people's

00:25:57.060 oxytocin?

00:25:59.780 So oxytocin is

00:26:01.160 the beneficial

00:26:02.780 health-related,

00:26:04.900 what do you

00:26:07.180 call it,

00:26:07.440 hormone,

00:26:08.460 that you get,

00:26:10.180 or chemical

00:26:10.660 release,

00:26:12.080 that you get

00:26:12.560 when you're

00:26:12.980 having a social

00:26:13.780 interaction that's

00:26:14.720 a positive one.

00:26:16.480 Right?

00:26:16.900 So I think you

00:26:17.740 would agree that

00:26:18.440 our oxytocin

00:26:19.400 levels went down

00:26:21.140 during social

00:26:22.300 distancing.

00:26:23.640 Would you all

00:26:24.100 agree that your

00:26:25.760 normal oxytocin

00:26:26.780 levels should go

00:26:27.420 way down?

00:26:28.040 Okay.

00:26:28.900 Now, I

00:26:30.440 googled oxytocin

00:26:32.900 and heart

00:26:33.680 disease.

00:26:34.900 What do you

00:26:35.580 think I found?

00:26:37.060 Exactly what you

00:26:37.900 think, right?

00:26:39.340 Without knowing,

00:26:40.620 I thought, you

00:26:41.240 know, I'll bet

00:26:41.740 you if I google

00:26:42.500 oxytocin and

00:26:43.580 heart disease,

00:26:44.600 if you don't

00:26:45.400 have enough

00:26:45.820 oxytocin, I'll

00:26:46.620 bet you get

00:26:47.000 heart disease.

00:26:48.340 Guess what?

00:26:48.960 You get heart

00:26:51.380 disease if you

00:26:52.040 don't have enough

00:26:52.540 oxytocin.

00:26:54.840 So there's a

00:26:56.180 direct, very

00:26:58.320 well understood

00:26:59.060 correlation.

00:27:00.840 Put people in

00:27:01.640 isolation,

00:27:03.360 oxytocin goes

00:27:04.340 down, heart

00:27:05.980 disease goes

00:27:06.680 up.

00:27:08.320 Any argument

00:27:09.400 with that?

00:27:10.800 Would anybody

00:27:11.340 argue with that

00:27:12.080 direct line of

00:27:13.600 influence?

00:27:14.380 Anybody?

00:27:14.600 Anybody?

00:27:14.700 No, of

00:27:17.260 course not.

00:27:18.200 So that's

00:27:18.840 definitely part

00:27:19.520 of it.

00:27:21.100 Don't know if

00:27:21.980 it's a small

00:27:22.600 part or a big

00:27:23.460 part.

00:27:24.820 Now, how

00:27:25.340 about cortisol?

00:27:27.600 Cortisol is

00:27:28.420 your stress

00:27:29.200 chemistry.

00:27:30.540 If you have

00:27:31.000 more cortisol,

00:27:32.500 is that going

00:27:32.980 to be good or

00:27:33.620 bad for your

00:27:34.700 cardio situation?

00:27:37.840 Bad.

00:27:39.000 Bad, right?

00:27:40.340 Do you think

00:27:40.900 people had more

00:27:41.880 oxytocin because

00:27:42.980 they had to stay

00:27:43.480 home locked in

00:27:44.260 a place and

00:27:44.840 couldn't have

00:27:45.360 normal recreation?

00:27:47.500 Of course.

00:27:48.260 Of course.

00:27:49.680 So we have,

00:27:51.300 and those are

00:27:51.800 not the only

00:27:52.240 chemicals, right?

00:27:53.220 They keep you

00:27:53.700 healthy.

00:27:54.620 There is a

00:27:55.520 range of

00:27:56.120 chemicals,

00:27:57.160 from oxytocin

00:27:58.320 to cortisol,

00:27:59.220 et cetera,

00:27:59.840 that are very

00:28:00.960 directly changed

00:28:03.440 by changing

00:28:04.700 our living

00:28:06.060 situation and

00:28:07.420 locking us

00:28:08.120 down.

00:28:10.220 All of those

00:28:11.180 things should

00:28:11.960 have resulted

00:28:13.780 collectively in

00:28:15.560 a massive

00:28:16.020 amount of

00:28:16.680 extra deaths.

00:28:21.660 And that

00:28:22.320 would be

00:28:22.640 unrelated

00:28:23.060 directly to

00:28:24.520 the vaccination,

00:28:25.740 but very

00:28:26.140 related to the

00:28:26.980 bad decision to

00:28:28.100 lock down the

00:28:28.700 way we did.

00:28:30.100 So that would

00:28:30.740 be a direct

00:28:31.480 connection between

00:28:32.740 the management

00:28:34.000 of our

00:28:34.900 government and

00:28:36.140 the outcomes,

00:28:36.740 the number of

00:28:37.440 heart attacks.

00:28:38.460 It's pretty

00:28:38.980 direct.

00:28:39.360 Now, you

00:28:40.740 say I'm

00:28:41.060 guessing, but

00:28:42.220 I'm not

00:28:42.580 guessing about

00:28:43.120 the connection.

00:28:44.960 It's a well

00:28:45.520 established

00:28:45.920 connection.

00:28:46.660 You do this

00:28:47.180 to people,

00:28:48.200 their chemistry

00:28:48.760 changes this

00:28:49.500 way, change

00:28:50.600 that chemistry

00:28:51.120 that way, they

00:28:51.780 have more

00:28:52.100 heart attacks.

00:28:53.220 It's very

00:28:53.760 direct.

00:28:55.300 Now, how

00:28:55.760 about this?

00:28:57.060 Do you think

00:28:57.600 there were

00:28:58.000 more suicides

00:29:01.540 when social

00:29:03.700 distancing was

00:29:04.640 lifted or

00:29:06.100 when it was

00:29:06.560 in place?

00:29:07.720 What would

00:29:08.140 you expect,

00:29:08.740 just commonsensically?

00:29:10.180 Would there

00:29:10.540 be more

00:29:10.960 suicides when

00:29:11.840 you're in a

00:29:12.200 house full of

00:29:12.720 people or

00:29:13.860 more suicides

00:29:14.720 when you can

00:29:15.220 get some

00:29:15.600 privacy?

00:29:17.460 See, I

00:29:17.900 just changed

00:29:19.280 your answer by

00:29:20.720 the way I

00:29:21.020 asked it.

00:29:22.540 Now, there's

00:29:23.240 no way you're

00:29:23.780 going to kill

00:29:24.060 yourself in a

00:29:24.740 house full of

00:29:25.220 people.

00:29:26.960 Let me

00:29:27.500 reverse that.

00:29:28.340 Of course,

00:29:28.880 some people

00:29:29.260 will.

00:29:30.660 That would be

00:29:31.320 the rarest kind

00:29:32.220 of suicide.

00:29:33.360 The rarest

00:29:34.200 suicide is that

00:29:35.000 there's somebody

00:29:35.500 that wants to

00:29:36.420 save you,

00:29:37.040 literally on the

00:29:37.980 other side of

00:29:38.420 the door.

00:29:40.240 Right?

00:29:40.960 You wouldn't do

00:29:41.600 it then,

00:29:42.700 especially if you

00:29:43.540 were concerned

00:29:43.980 about who

00:29:44.320 finds you.

00:29:46.240 It's my

00:29:46.840 common sense

00:29:47.520 opinion,

00:29:48.680 based on no

00:29:49.700 data,

00:29:50.560 there's no

00:29:50.940 data,

00:29:51.520 but it's my

00:29:52.020 common sense

00:29:52.640 opinion that

00:29:53.960 nobody kills

00:29:54.640 himself in a

00:29:55.380 crowded house.

00:29:57.980 When I say

00:29:58.720 nobody, I mean

00:29:59.500 mostly.

00:30:00.340 Mostly.

00:30:01.400 Would you

00:30:01.980 agree?

00:30:02.820 Does that make

00:30:03.320 sense?

00:30:03.780 That if you

00:30:04.180 were of that

00:30:04.820 frame of mind,

00:30:05.720 you would go

00:30:06.760 somewhere where

00:30:07.300 you could be

00:30:07.700 alone, and

00:30:09.080 that was much

00:30:09.780 harder during

00:30:10.360 the pandemic.

00:30:12.560 And also, I

00:30:13.560 think that some

00:30:14.780 people, even if

00:30:15.620 they hated being

00:30:16.340 around people, at

00:30:17.640 least they weren't

00:30:18.180 lonely.

00:30:19.560 Like, there must

00:30:20.120 have been a lot

00:30:20.560 of lonely people

00:30:21.400 who were forced

00:30:23.900 to be with other

00:30:24.600 people for the

00:30:25.240 first time.

00:30:27.140 Maybe.

00:30:28.400 So, that kind

00:30:29.460 of disruption,

00:30:30.320 you could imagine,

00:30:31.660 would create a,

00:30:32.440 you know, a little

00:30:33.340 spurt at the end.

00:30:34.660 What about the

00:30:37.180 people dying of

00:30:37.980 just regular

00:30:38.540 COVID?

00:30:40.020 Did you know

00:30:40.520 that more

00:30:40.960 people died of

00:30:41.680 COVID this

00:30:42.240 year than, I

00:30:44.120 think, more

00:30:44.520 died in this

00:30:45.500 year than last

00:30:46.460 year?

00:30:47.280 Did you know

00:30:47.760 that?

00:30:48.720 In the United

00:30:49.420 States, more

00:30:50.780 people died of

00:30:51.480 COVID this year

00:30:52.100 than last year?

00:30:53.360 You know, after

00:30:53.980 massive vaccinations?

00:30:56.540 Give me a fact

00:30:57.360 check, but I

00:30:57.820 think that's true,

00:30:58.400 right?

00:30:59.160 More people died

00:30:59.960 this year than

00:31:00.420 last year.

00:31:01.540 Of COVID.

00:31:02.620 When I say of

00:31:03.380 COVID, let's

00:31:04.640 not get into

00:31:05.140 the conversation,

00:31:05.980 we know there's

00:31:06.480 a question about

00:31:07.700 how that data

00:31:09.500 is collected.

00:31:10.820 But those are

00:31:11.580 the official

00:31:11.960 data.

00:31:13.340 Now, why

00:31:15.080 would COVID

00:31:15.900 deaths go up

00:31:16.960 at the same

00:31:18.160 time as

00:31:19.660 vaccinations are

00:31:20.600 being rolled

00:31:21.140 out?

00:31:22.280 Well, it could

00:31:23.060 be.

00:31:24.020 Some people

00:31:24.660 say, well,

00:31:25.180 obviously that's

00:31:25.860 telling us the

00:31:26.800 vaccinations are

00:31:27.600 killing people. 0.87

00:31:28.380 Could be.

00:31:29.380 That's entirely

00:31:30.080 possible.

00:31:31.080 I'm not ruling

00:31:31.680 that out at all.

00:31:33.400 Here's the

00:31:33.800 other reason.

00:31:35.120 Because at the

00:31:35.920 same time they

00:31:36.440 rolled out the

00:31:36.920 vaccinations, they

00:31:38.620 lifted the

00:31:39.880 restrictions.

00:31:41.380 And everybody

00:31:41.880 went out and

00:31:42.400 acted safe.

00:31:43.880 But it turns out

00:31:45.140 they were not

00:31:45.620 safe, because the

00:31:46.500 vaccination did not 0.98

00:31:47.500 make them safe.

00:31:48.500 So they got COVID

00:31:49.500 and died.

00:31:51.060 So it turns out

00:31:52.020 that lifting the

00:31:53.060 mandates has a

00:31:54.760 very predictable

00:31:55.620 impact.

00:31:57.120 We know more

00:31:58.040 people are going

00:31:58.560 to die.

00:31:58.900 and we still

00:32:00.040 want to do

00:32:00.520 it.

00:32:01.320 Because, you

00:32:01.840 know, freedom,

00:32:02.440 right?

00:32:03.120 So you should

00:32:04.820 have seen a

00:32:05.420 massive increase

00:32:06.240 in COVID deaths

00:32:07.560 at the same time

00:32:09.020 as the vaccination

00:32:09.900 under all

00:32:11.560 circumstances.

00:32:12.580 You would have

00:32:13.200 seen the massive

00:32:13.800 increase if the

00:32:14.700 vaccination was

00:32:15.540 killing people. 0.87

00:32:16.600 And I don't see

00:32:17.300 that evidence in

00:32:18.400 terms of killing

00:32:19.900 more people than

00:32:20.560 COVID.

00:32:21.360 And you would see

00:32:22.220 it if it was just

00:32:22.780 COVID.

00:32:23.960 So under all

00:32:24.880 scenarios, there

00:32:25.700 would be a spike

00:32:26.420 with or without

00:32:27.560 the vaccinations.

00:32:28.900 Does that make

00:32:29.940 sense?

00:32:32.260 Logically, as soon

00:32:33.180 as we lifted the

00:32:34.480 restrictions, there

00:32:35.320 would be more

00:32:35.800 deaths, no matter

00:32:36.860 what.

00:32:37.880 No matter what.

00:32:38.860 But at least you

00:32:39.460 could choose.

00:32:40.420 That was what they

00:32:41.600 offered us.

00:32:42.220 It wasn't true.

00:32:43.560 But the government

00:32:45.140 would say, well, you

00:32:45.880 could choose to be

00:32:46.660 safe by getting

00:32:47.600 vaccinated.

00:32:49.040 You can argue

00:32:49.740 that.

00:32:51.420 So then it became

00:32:52.380 more of a personal

00:32:53.120 choice.

00:32:54.240 So even the

00:32:54.780 government was

00:32:55.480 allowing that they

00:32:56.820 would allow more

00:32:57.460 people to die.

00:32:58.900 But everybody

00:32:59.720 died, would at

00:33:00.700 least have a

00:33:01.100 choice of having

00:33:01.740 getting the

00:33:02.160 vaccination and

00:33:03.020 changing their

00:33:03.740 odds according to

00:33:05.300 the government.

00:33:06.760 According to the

00:33:07.300 government.

00:33:08.260 All right, what

00:33:08.540 else?

00:33:09.260 Are there any

00:33:09.960 other possible

00:33:11.420 reasons?

00:33:12.620 Number one, did

00:33:13.620 you know that

00:33:14.100 fentanyl was

00:33:15.220 replacing heroin

00:33:17.480 at exactly the

00:33:19.080 same time?

00:33:19.560 how many of you

00:33:21.340 knew that the

00:33:22.780 mix of fentanyl to

00:33:24.460 heroin changed

00:33:25.980 radically at about

00:33:26.980 the same time that

00:33:27.740 the vaccinations

00:33:28.380 came out?

00:33:29.260 Did you know

00:33:29.700 that?

00:33:31.720 It's right about

00:33:32.540 the same time.

00:33:34.120 And that should

00:33:35.880 have created a

00:33:37.420 massive spike in

00:33:38.740 overdose deaths.

00:33:40.200 Did we see a

00:33:41.100 massive spike in

00:33:42.020 overdose deaths that

00:33:43.020 started about the

00:33:43.780 same time as the

00:33:44.420 vaccinations?

00:33:45.560 Did that happen?

00:33:47.180 Do you know?

00:33:47.680 Did we see a

00:33:49.780 massive spike in

00:33:51.660 overdoses because of

00:33:52.720 fentanyl at the

00:33:53.900 same time, at

00:33:55.300 exactly the same

00:33:56.080 time as the

00:33:56.540 vaccinations were

00:33:57.240 being rolled out?

00:33:58.500 Yes.

00:33:59.760 Yes, it was

00:34:00.400 exactly the same

00:34:01.080 time.

00:34:01.680 I say exactly, but

00:34:02.980 you know what I

00:34:03.420 mean.

00:34:03.700 It was that period.

00:34:05.220 So again, the

00:34:06.980 direct increase in

00:34:09.280 deaths at exactly

00:34:10.340 the time as the

00:34:11.140 vaccination wouldn't 0.97

00:34:13.060 be completely

00:34:13.680 explained by

00:34:14.420 fentanyl.

00:34:15.700 Would you agree?

00:34:16.280 Fentanyl is

00:34:17.900 clearly not the

00:34:18.580 whole explanation

00:34:19.480 here.

00:34:20.340 But remember, we've

00:34:21.260 now got like five

00:34:22.880 or six very clear

00:34:24.880 things that would

00:34:25.560 have happened at

00:34:26.100 the same time.

00:34:27.520 Probably five or

00:34:28.620 six.

00:34:29.640 The vaccination is

00:34:30.460 one, and I do

00:34:31.960 not rule out at

00:34:33.140 all that it could

00:34:34.480 have caused all of

00:34:35.500 the excess deaths.

00:34:37.140 Maybe.

00:34:38.460 Maybe.

00:34:39.280 Because I don't

00:34:39.760 have data one way

00:34:40.460 or the other.

00:34:41.500 But would you agree

00:34:42.400 that all of the

00:34:43.140 other things I'm

00:34:43.820 mentioning happened

00:34:45.000 about the same

00:34:45.620 time and logically

00:34:47.400 should have caused

00:34:48.380 the increase of

00:34:49.140 deaths that we

00:34:49.700 see, exactly the

00:34:51.060 way we see them.

00:34:54.300 And let's see

00:34:55.060 what else.

00:34:55.920 Here's another

00:34:56.520 one.

00:34:57.300 Let's see if

00:34:57.880 anybody thought of

00:34:58.600 this one.

00:34:59.700 You know that

00:35:00.500 traffic accidents

00:35:01.560 were up, right?

00:35:03.360 I'll need a fact

00:35:04.280 check on that,

00:35:04.920 too.

00:35:05.260 But at one point

00:35:05.900 I heard that after

00:35:06.860 the lockdown,

00:35:08.220 traffic accidents

00:35:09.100 went up.

00:35:10.060 Do you know

00:35:10.440 why?

00:35:12.240 Obviously.

00:35:13.760 Obviously.

00:35:14.200 Why?

00:35:16.580 There's an obvious

00:35:17.360 reason.

00:35:18.620 Because people

00:35:19.220 drove less for

00:35:20.380 two years.

00:35:21.920 I had trouble

00:35:22.860 driving in traffic

00:35:23.720 after the lockdowns

00:35:25.480 were over.

00:35:26.140 Did you?

00:35:27.620 Did anybody have

00:35:28.240 trouble driving in

00:35:29.360 heavy traffic?

00:35:30.720 It was hard,

00:35:31.380 wasn't it?

00:35:32.720 Yeah.

00:35:33.780 I was actually

00:35:34.740 out of practice.

00:35:36.340 And it was a

00:35:36.880 little nervous

00:35:38.200 making at first.

00:35:39.640 Took me a while

00:35:40.360 to work my way

00:35:41.420 back into being

00:35:42.360 what I considered

00:35:43.360 a good enough

00:35:44.020 driver.

00:35:45.160 Because I drove

00:35:46.140 plenty during the

00:35:47.080 lockdown.

00:35:47.620 I did a lot of

00:35:48.140 driving.

00:35:49.200 But it was all

00:35:49.820 on empty streets,

00:35:51.980 you know,

00:35:52.280 like easy driving.

00:35:54.000 Right.

00:35:54.620 So,

00:35:55.740 now,

00:35:56.920 since we also

00:35:57.640 know that

00:35:58.040 overdose deaths

00:35:59.020 were up,

00:36:00.660 whether it's

00:36:01.280 fentanyl or

00:36:01.840 anything else,

00:36:02.740 overdose deaths

00:36:03.480 were way up.

00:36:04.940 What will that

00:36:05.840 do to driving

00:36:06.860 accidents?

00:36:08.860 Yeah.

00:36:09.080 It's probably

00:36:09.960 related to how

00:36:10.680 much drugs

00:36:11.880 people had

00:36:12.400 and there

00:36:13.380 was probably

00:36:13.800 a rebound

00:36:14.880 effect where

00:36:15.460 people had

00:36:15.860 been locked

00:36:16.200 down for

00:36:16.600 two years

00:36:17.120 and the

00:36:17.920 people who

00:36:18.220 were locked

00:36:18.480 down for

00:36:18.800 two years

00:36:19.180 didn't know

00:36:19.520 how to

00:36:19.700 handle partying

00:36:20.360 anymore.

00:36:21.280 Like they

00:36:21.820 forgot how

00:36:23.260 to get a

00:36:23.840 designated driver.

00:36:26.120 You know,

00:36:26.300 and I say

00:36:26.700 that literally.

00:36:27.840 Like you could

00:36:28.460 actually get

00:36:28.980 out of the

00:36:29.340 habit of

00:36:30.520 knowing how

00:36:30.920 to protect

00:36:31.340 yourself.

00:36:32.280 That's the

00:36:32.640 thing.

00:36:33.580 Because everything's

00:36:34.380 habit-based,

00:36:35.080 right?

00:36:35.700 Even knowing

00:36:36.220 how to keep

00:36:36.880 yourself alive,

00:36:38.560 the most

00:36:38.860 basics of

00:36:39.480 life are

00:36:39.840 habit-based.

00:36:40.860 And people

00:36:41.240 got out of

00:36:41.580 the habit of

00:36:42.020 staying alive,

00:36:43.140 knowing that

00:36:43.640 I'd better

00:36:44.040 leave my

00:36:44.440 keys with

00:36:45.440 my friend.

00:36:46.620 So some

00:36:47.100 of that.

00:36:48.080 Now how

00:36:48.400 much of

00:36:48.740 that was

00:36:49.960 causing

00:36:50.640 excess deaths?

00:36:51.740 Maybe none.

00:36:53.080 Maybe none.

00:36:54.000 But if you

00:36:54.500 ignore it,

00:36:55.180 I think you're

00:36:55.600 ignoring a

00:36:56.140 big potential

00:36:57.300 variable.

00:36:59.320 How about

00:37:00.220 obesity?

00:37:02.400 How about

00:37:02.720 obesity?

00:37:05.140 Obesity was

00:37:05.900 at its

00:37:06.220 highest.

00:37:06.600 about the

00:37:07.340 same time

00:37:08.080 as the

00:37:09.280 vaccinations.

00:37:10.180 Why was

00:37:10.780 obesity at

00:37:11.580 its highest

00:37:12.300 at the

00:37:13.420 same time

00:37:13.900 as the

00:37:14.180 vaccinations?

00:37:15.200 Because that

00:37:15.900 was the

00:37:16.200 same moment

00:37:16.660 we opened

00:37:17.160 up the

00:37:17.720 gyms,

00:37:18.880 right?

00:37:20.280 And at

00:37:20.800 the same

00:37:21.200 time the

00:37:21.540 vaccinations

00:37:22.040 were coming

00:37:22.580 out,

00:37:23.100 that's why

00:37:23.820 they opened

00:37:24.360 the gym.

00:37:25.660 Because it

00:37:26.420 seemed safer.

00:37:28.580 So you

00:37:30.340 should have

00:37:30.720 seen all

00:37:31.140 these fat

00:37:31.740 people go

00:37:33.660 out and try

00:37:34.140 to exercise

00:37:34.680 for the first

00:37:35.400 time in two

00:37:35.860 years and

00:37:36.220 have heart

00:37:36.560 attacks and

00:37:37.020 fall over

00:37:37.460 because they

00:37:38.440 didn't know

00:37:39.020 that they

00:37:39.880 couldn't do

00:37:40.280 what they

00:37:40.580 used to

00:37:40.920 do.

00:37:42.100 Now again,

00:37:43.240 it's probably

00:37:43.760 not a

00:37:44.140 gigantic number

00:37:44.940 of people,

00:37:45.840 but look at

00:37:46.520 all the

00:37:46.800 things that

00:37:47.220 collectively

00:37:47.760 should have

00:37:48.360 killed more

00:37:48.860 people.

00:37:49.220 Lindsay says,

00:37:52.680 let me take

00:37:54.360 care of this

00:37:54.700 stupid cunt 1.00

00:37:55.260 first.

00:37:55.900 And by the

00:37:56.220 way, that's

00:37:56.540 probably what

00:37:56.920 gets me

00:37:57.240 demonetized.

00:37:58.320 All right,

00:37:58.480 Lindsay

00:37:58.740 Jackson, you

00:37:59.400 stupid cunt 1.00

00:38:00.100 in all

00:38:00.460 capitals.

00:38:01.280 Scott, why

00:38:01.860 did you

00:38:02.140 support

00:38:02.460 lockdowns?

00:38:03.320 Never

00:38:03.720 fucking

00:38:04.220 happened.

00:38:04.960 Not once,

00:38:06.020 not indirectly,

00:38:07.160 not directly,

00:38:08.160 not once.

00:38:09.260 You fucking

00:38:10.080 asshole.

00:38:11.520 All right?

00:38:11.960 When you come

00:38:12.520 over here and

00:38:12.980 you stop

00:38:13.300 rumors like

00:38:13.820 that, you

00:38:14.480 decrease the

00:38:15.140 effectiveness

00:38:15.560 of what I'm

00:38:16.660 doing, by

00:38:17.800 lowering my

00:38:18.540 credibility, you

00:38:19.640 are a fucking 0.98

00:38:20.600 traitorous cunt. 0.99

00:38:22.760 Because what I

00:38:23.380 do is specifically

00:38:25.220 designed to help

00:38:26.140 people live

00:38:26.700 better.

00:38:27.500 You are

00:38:28.060 detracting from

00:38:28.760 that.

00:38:29.960 Check yourself.

00:38:31.080 Unless you're a 0.94

00:38:31.800 fucking Russian 0.96

00:38:32.400 troll, in which

00:38:33.520 case, good job.

00:38:34.820 If you're a real

00:38:35.560 person, you are a 0.59

00:38:36.780 fucking piece of

00:38:37.560 shit, Lindsay

00:38:38.100 Jackson.

00:38:38.740 I doubt that's a

00:38:39.360 real person.

00:38:40.100 But you are a

00:38:40.800 real piece of

00:38:41.360 shit.

00:38:42.200 Just check what

00:38:43.780 you're doing right

00:38:44.480 now.

00:38:45.560 Creating rumors

00:38:46.680 that decrease the

00:38:47.820 effectiveness of

00:38:48.660 something that's

00:38:49.220 only positive.

00:38:50.720 Only positive to

00:38:52.160 understand how

00:38:53.540 better to understand

00:38:54.460 our news, right?

00:38:55.460 Am I hurting you?

00:38:56.800 Am I fucking

00:38:57.640 hurting you in

00:38:58.300 some way, Lindsay

00:38:59.400 fucking cunt? 1.00

00:39:00.660 Get the fuck out

00:39:01.760 of here.

00:39:02.960 I don't think she's

00:39:03.600 real, by the way.

00:39:04.660 I think that's just

00:39:05.380 trolls.

00:39:07.060 But I want to make

00:39:07.980 that very clear.

00:39:09.360 Now, does anybody

00:39:10.100 know why I go off

00:39:11.020 so hard?

00:39:12.980 How many of you

00:39:13.820 know why I do

00:39:14.500 that?

00:39:15.560 Because I don't

00:39:15.860 think it's obvious

00:39:16.500 to a lot of

00:39:16.960 people.

00:39:20.620 Because I'm an

00:39:21.340 energy monster.

00:39:23.380 I just took her 0.56

00:39:24.400 negative energy, and

00:39:25.940 I used it to

00:39:26.720 clarify a rumor

00:39:28.920 that a lot of

00:39:29.480 people have.

00:39:30.320 Because there are

00:39:30.680 other people who

00:39:31.180 have that point of

00:39:31.920 view.

00:39:32.600 So by going off on

00:39:33.600 that stupid cunt in 1.00

00:39:35.280 a way that you can't

00:39:36.100 possibly ignore.

00:39:38.180 I mean, if a public

00:39:39.740 figure calls a

00:39:40.980 specific individual a

00:39:42.640 stupid, ignorant, 0.98

00:39:44.760 useless cunt, you 0.99

00:39:47.140 can't look away,

00:39:47.820 right?

00:39:49.440 Do you think

00:39:50.340 anybody turned off

00:39:51.320 this feed while I

00:39:52.720 was going off on

00:39:53.500 her?

00:39:54.660 Of course not.

00:39:55.860 You've got to see

00:39:56.460 how that ends, right?

00:39:57.740 So what I do is I

00:39:59.020 take her negative

00:39:59.760 energy, I package

00:40:01.740 it, I use it to

00:40:04.560 make a case that's

00:40:05.720 good for me and

00:40:06.600 also good for you.

00:40:07.400 Because you would

00:40:08.500 like to know what's

00:40:09.060 true and what's not

00:40:09.740 true.

00:40:10.720 And then I use that

00:40:11.760 energy for my

00:40:12.920 purposes, and then

00:40:14.240 we move on.

00:40:16.000 So that's what you're

00:40:16.940 seeing, in case you're

00:40:18.480 wondering what's

00:40:19.020 behind it.

00:40:19.400 Am I losing control?

00:40:22.420 How many think I

00:40:23.300 lost control?

00:40:24.860 Does anybody think

00:40:25.460 that?

00:40:26.380 Do you think that was

00:40:27.000 an example of me

00:40:27.840 getting angry and

00:40:29.560 losing control?

00:40:30.900 No, it wasn't.

00:40:33.280 I don't know if I've

00:40:34.320 ever lost control.

00:40:35.300 Like, in my life, I'm

00:40:38.020 not sure I've ever

00:40:38.640 been so angry that I

00:40:40.640 lost control.

00:40:41.340 I don't know that's

00:40:41.920 ever happened.

00:40:43.580 If it ever happens,

00:40:45.620 you're really going to

00:40:46.440 know it.

00:40:48.600 You won't be

00:40:49.580 confused.

00:40:50.620 If I ever lose

00:40:51.800 control because I'm

00:40:52.740 angry, you're going

00:40:53.920 to know it.

00:40:55.460 If you're wondering

00:40:56.540 if I lost control,

00:40:57.780 then I didn't.

00:40:58.920 If there's any doubt

00:40:59.800 about it, it definitely

00:41:00.760 didn't happen.

00:41:02.080 You won't have any

00:41:03.060 doubt if it happens.

00:41:05.300 All right, so

00:41:06.620 obesity.

00:41:07.360 We also didn't talk

00:41:08.180 about long COVID.

00:41:09.900 Now, I don't even

00:41:10.740 know if long COVID is

00:41:11.780 real, right?

00:41:13.720 Thank you, Gina.

00:41:15.600 I don't know if long

00:41:16.580 COVID is real.

00:41:18.360 But if it is, don't

00:41:20.200 you think it would

00:41:21.140 kill some people who

00:41:23.360 were maybe marginal

00:41:24.580 to begin with?

00:41:25.660 It might be real.

00:41:26.620 I don't know.

00:41:27.280 So throw that in the

00:41:28.980 mix, too.

00:41:29.420 All right.

00:41:33.960 And then, do you

00:41:34.540 think people would

00:41:35.180 do more or less

00:41:36.560 drugs and drinking

00:41:37.860 after social distancing

00:41:39.280 is lifted?

00:41:40.640 Generally speaking,

00:41:42.020 do you think that

00:41:43.260 when people are

00:41:43.900 alone, they do the

00:41:45.560 same amount of

00:41:46.200 drugs as when

00:41:47.860 they're with people

00:41:48.500 who are doing

00:41:48.980 drugs also?

00:41:51.160 I feel like people

00:41:53.560 would do more drugs

00:41:54.520 with people.

00:41:56.300 Does anybody

00:41:56.680 disagree?

00:41:57.480 No, everybody's

00:41:58.200 different, right?

00:41:59.060 So it could go

00:41:59.840 either way, but on

00:42:00.840 average.

00:42:02.660 All right.

00:42:02.980 So here's how I

00:42:03.780 think people die.

00:42:06.020 If you got some

00:42:07.740 drugs from a friend,

00:42:09.340 you might ask some

00:42:10.160 questions about, you

00:42:11.420 know, the providence

00:42:12.120 of them.

00:42:13.300 Providence?

00:42:14.180 Where they came

00:42:14.780 from?

00:42:17.340 And so you might

00:42:18.400 do a little bit of

00:42:19.360 a good job protecting

00:42:20.440 your risks or your

00:42:23.380 life.

00:42:24.420 So you might ask

00:42:25.020 some good questions.

00:42:25.760 If you're alone and

00:42:26.660 you're just going to

00:42:27.120 take that drug and

00:42:27.880 send you a room.

00:42:29.080 Now let's say you

00:42:29.880 go to a party.

00:42:31.800 You're really buzzed

00:42:32.980 at the party.

00:42:34.000 Somebody hands you

00:42:34.680 a beer.

00:42:35.880 Well, you didn't

00:42:36.620 want to mix, but

00:42:38.300 that does look

00:42:39.080 delicious and you're

00:42:39.860 thirsty, so you

00:42:41.000 take the beer.

00:42:42.440 Now you're a little

00:42:43.220 bit drunk.

00:42:44.380 Maybe I have a

00:42:44.940 second one.

00:42:46.120 A little bit drunk

00:42:46.840 and somebody says,

00:42:48.340 hey, how about

00:42:50.320 this pill?

00:42:51.740 It's a Xanax.

00:42:52.980 I promise you

00:42:53.820 it's a Xanax.

00:42:54.640 And now you're

00:42:55.560 totally drunk and

00:42:56.680 you're not making

00:42:57.200 good decisions.

00:42:58.880 And you say,

00:42:59.440 all right, if Bob

00:43:01.160 says it's good, I'll

00:43:03.100 take it.

00:43:04.360 Well, and it's

00:43:06.040 fentanyl and you

00:43:07.880 die because you

00:43:09.760 already had too much

00:43:10.700 of other stuff in

00:43:11.500 you.

00:43:11.680 So there's a pure

00:43:14.640 effect when you're

00:43:16.200 with people to take

00:43:17.780 a little extra or

00:43:19.760 a little different.

00:43:20.820 Like, well, you're

00:43:21.780 already buzzed from

00:43:22.600 this, but would it

00:43:24.260 kill you?

00:43:25.040 Would it kill you to

00:43:26.000 take this too?

00:43:27.580 See, my drug-taking

00:43:29.900 experience tells me

00:43:31.040 this.

00:43:31.760 If you're doing

00:43:32.480 drugs by yourself at

00:43:33.640 home during social

00:43:34.500 distancing, it could

00:43:36.220 be pretty bad.

00:43:37.260 And you might even

00:43:38.020 creep up how much

00:43:39.400 you're doing because

00:43:40.220 maybe you get used

00:43:41.140 to it, right?

00:43:41.960 So you can see

00:43:43.160 people doing way

00:43:44.780 too much drugs at

00:43:45.860 home alone.

00:43:47.040 But when you add

00:43:48.340 other people, those

00:43:49.940 other people add not

00:43:51.260 just drugs, but a

00:43:53.600 diversity of drugs.

00:43:55.900 It's the diversity of

00:43:57.320 what your friends have

00:43:58.140 in their pockets that

00:43:59.440 will kill you. 0.98

00:44:00.620 It's not you deciding

00:44:01.740 how much you're going

00:44:02.340 to make all by

00:44:02.920 yourself.

00:44:03.880 It's your friend

00:44:04.620 saying, you know, it

00:44:06.240 wouldn't kill you to

00:44:06.920 take one more of these,

00:44:09.040 except that it actually

00:44:10.700 kills you. 0.95

00:44:11.260 So that's just a whole

00:44:15.840 bunch of assumptions.

00:44:18.500 So at the same time

00:44:19.820 that vaccinations were

00:44:20.800 rolled out, you should 0.99

00:44:21.760 see more ODs.

00:44:22.940 You should see more

00:44:24.200 drug-related deaths of

00:44:25.960 every kind, from crime

00:44:29.440 to accidents to traffic

00:44:31.720 accidents.

00:44:32.960 You should see more

00:44:33.720 drugs when people are

00:44:34.520 social distancing.

00:44:35.800 You should see more

00:44:36.680 heart disease because of

00:44:37.980 the social distancing.

00:44:39.380 That should have had a

00:44:40.100 cumulative effect.

00:44:41.480 You should see more

00:44:42.200 obesity-related dying,

00:44:43.880 more suicide-related

00:44:44.860 dying.

00:44:45.860 People aren't 0.94

00:44:46.540 practiced to driving.

00:44:47.720 We don't know if long

00:44:48.440 COVID is killing anybody

00:44:49.460 or not.

00:44:51.680 And then, of course,

00:44:52.820 there's more people

00:44:54.360 getting out, so they got

00:44:55.400 more infected, et cetera.

00:44:56.440 So, given all of

00:45:02.420 that, I'll give you the

00:45:05.980 final Twitter poll where

00:45:07.680 I asked, do you believe,

00:45:09.460 based on your news

00:45:10.240 sources, that more people

00:45:11.960 died from COVID or the

00:45:14.480 COVID shots, you know,

00:45:16.080 speaking in the more

00:45:17.640 recent times, did more

00:45:19.340 people die from COVID or

00:45:20.520 the COVID shots, at least

00:45:21.720 from the time that the

00:45:22.720 COVID shots were widely

00:45:23.780 available?

00:45:24.140 Or is there no way to

00:45:26.020 know?

00:45:27.080 Here were the results.

00:45:29.100 The people who said that

00:45:30.060 more people died from

00:45:31.460 COVID than from the

00:45:32.660 shots, about one quarter,

00:45:35.520 about one quarter.

00:45:38.480 Thank you.

00:45:40.180 I appreciate that,

00:45:41.000 William.

00:45:43.340 Now, how many people

00:45:44.440 said that the shots

00:45:45.600 themselves killed more

00:45:47.080 people than the COVID

00:45:47.900 did?

00:45:49.060 About one quarter.

00:45:50.780 Actually, 25%,

00:45:51.860 exactly.

00:45:53.180 25%.

00:45:53.700 And how many said

00:45:55.060 there's no way to

00:45:55.700 know?

00:45:56.460 49%.

00:45:56.860 Now, you remember my

00:45:58.220 25% rule?

00:45:59.500 Of course you do.

00:46:01.240 That 25% will get every 0.99

00:46:03.460 question wrong.

00:46:05.720 But this one's weird,

00:46:07.700 isn't it?

00:46:08.620 Because there are two

00:46:09.440 25s, and they're

00:46:10.560 opposites.

00:46:11.780 They can't both be true,

00:46:12.880 right?

00:46:13.080 It can't be true that

00:46:14.320 more people died of

00:46:15.380 vaccinations than COVID,

00:46:17.620 while also true that

00:46:19.320 more people died of

00:46:20.120 COVID than vaccinations.

00:46:21.740 So they can't both be

00:46:22.640 true.

00:46:23.700 So would this be an

00:46:25.360 exception to my rock

00:46:27.880 solid rule that 25% of

00:46:29.540 the public gets

00:46:30.060 everything wrong?

00:46:34.520 It's not.

00:46:36.720 Because both of the 25% 1.00

00:46:38.620 are wrong.

00:46:40.140 They're both wrong.

00:46:42.540 What's true is you don't

00:46:43.820 know.

00:46:45.560 The 50% or the half of the

00:46:47.480 people who said there's no

00:46:48.960 way to know, that was

00:46:50.480 unambiguously the right

00:46:51.820 answer, unambiguously.

00:46:54.240 This is one of those few

00:46:55.180 where you don't have to

00:46:56.280 wonder about the right

00:46:57.140 answer.

00:46:58.700 No matter what you think

00:46:59.940 is happening, it's

00:47:01.440 unambiguously true that you

00:47:02.720 can't know for sure.

00:47:05.200 Unambiguously.

00:47:06.260 You could be really,

00:47:07.800 really like 90%, 95% sure

00:47:10.380 that the vaccinations are

00:47:12.080 worse than the COVID, or

00:47:13.080 vice versa, and both types

00:47:15.040 of people exist.

00:47:15.820 But if you're sure about

00:47:18.700 it, then you're probably

00:47:20.380 not as good at analyzing

00:47:22.380 as the people who are not

00:47:24.220 sure about it.

00:47:26.180 Now, some of the not

00:47:27.200 sures are just uninformed,

00:47:28.620 so they're telling you

00:47:29.560 they're uninformed, which

00:47:30.560 is fair.

00:47:32.260 Do two wrongs make a

00:47:33.300 right?

00:47:33.540 I don't think that's what's

00:47:34.360 happening.

00:47:36.140 You think someone knows?

00:47:37.420 I don't think so.

00:47:38.700 I don't think there's

00:47:39.580 anybody who knows.

00:47:41.260 Now, let me ask you this.

00:47:42.420 How many extra heart

00:47:45.000 attacks do you think,

00:47:47.420 like sudden deaths from

00:47:48.860 heart-related things, how

00:47:50.180 much extra do you think

00:47:51.400 the official numbers say

00:47:52.580 is happening?

00:47:53.460 Because it's very

00:47:54.040 noticeable.

00:47:55.400 Like, the baseline is

00:47:57.620 definitely more than the

00:47:58.580 baseline.

00:47:59.340 But how much more do you

00:48:00.100 think?

00:48:01.120 How much more?

00:48:02.500 Like, top of your head,

00:48:04.480 how many more heart

00:48:05.500 attacks are doctors

00:48:07.040 seeing?

00:48:08.400 What do you think?

00:48:10.200 Do you think it's 50%

00:48:11.980 more?

00:48:13.000 50%?

00:48:15.740 10%?

00:48:18.000 So, I don't know the

00:48:19.060 answer to that because I

00:48:20.300 saw a graph.

00:48:21.820 So, the graph was visual.

00:48:23.980 I didn't see the base

00:48:25.080 numbers.

00:48:25.940 But the official number

00:48:27.180 that I saw this morning is

00:48:29.440 that absolutely heart

00:48:30.720 attacks are up.

00:48:32.000 So, we can all agree on

00:48:33.240 that, right?

00:48:34.120 So, I believe even the

00:48:35.060 official numbers say heart

00:48:36.200 attacks are up, or heart

00:48:37.720 related, you know, cardiac

00:48:38.840 stuff.

00:48:39.880 So, everybody's on the same

00:48:41.140 page, significant increase

00:48:43.300 in heart attacks.

00:48:44.380 But how significant?

00:48:46.620 5%?

00:48:48.100 25%?

00:48:52.300 Visually, it looked like

00:48:53.340 about 5%.

00:48:54.260 Maybe 10%?

00:48:55.700 Maybe 10%.

00:48:56.060 Let me ask you this.

00:48:59.460 Have you not seen reports

00:49:01.300 from doctors saying,

00:49:03.620 my God, there are so many

00:49:04.960 more heart attacks.

00:49:07.220 There's definitely a

00:49:08.240 problem.

00:49:08.620 You've all seen those,

00:49:09.640 right?

00:49:10.440 Individual numbers of them.

00:49:13.080 Doctors, various mental

00:49:15.380 people saying, oh, my God,

00:49:17.420 it's so different.

00:49:18.100 Like, you can't miss it.

00:49:20.780 Right?

00:49:21.120 We've all seen it.

00:49:22.260 We know those exist.

00:49:24.140 Now, let me ask you this.

00:49:26.260 Is there a discrepancy here?

00:49:28.920 Do you think that all those

00:49:30.280 professionals would have

00:49:31.260 noticed a 10% change in

00:49:33.920 anything?

00:49:35.920 In anything?

00:49:37.360 Would they have noticed a

00:49:38.260 10% change from the

00:49:39.900 baseline?

00:49:42.520 No.

00:49:43.840 No.

00:49:44.300 It can't be true that

00:49:48.080 those are credible people

00:49:49.200 telling you that they have

00:49:51.300 noticed personally way too

00:49:53.360 many heart attack-related

00:49:55.020 deaths.

00:49:57.600 It can't be.

00:49:59.040 Because if it's like 5% or

00:50:00.340 10% difference, nobody

00:50:01.480 would notice that.

00:50:03.200 And if they did notice it,

00:50:04.780 they would tell you it's

00:50:05.800 5% or 10% different.

00:50:07.720 They wouldn't be screaming,

00:50:08.940 my God, do you know that

00:50:09.880 people are falling on the

00:50:11.360 sidewalks and everybody can

00:50:12.540 see it?

00:50:12.940 Because the official

00:50:14.440 numbers don't have anything

00:50:15.380 like that.

00:50:16.480 It's very clear something's

00:50:17.820 happening.

00:50:19.020 No doubt about it.

00:50:20.860 Well, I suppose I could

00:50:22.180 doubt all data.

00:50:23.080 I do that sometimes.

00:50:24.200 But it does seem that all

00:50:25.480 of the data is in the same

00:50:26.460 direction.

00:50:28.220 Something's killing people

00:50:29.320 extra.

00:50:30.480 But it doesn't look like the

00:50:33.500 medical professionals are

00:50:35.020 matching the official

00:50:36.520 government data, which could

00:50:39.080 be that the medical

00:50:39.860 professionals are right and

00:50:41.100 the data is wrong.

00:50:43.680 Won't rule that out.

00:50:45.480 10% is definitely

00:50:46.480 actionable, but would not

00:50:47.960 match the hysterical, it's

00:50:51.320 obvious there's more of

00:50:52.380 it.

00:50:53.280 Those just don't match.

00:50:55.140 But yes, 10% would be a big

00:50:56.640 deal and you have to worry

00:50:57.420 about that.

00:51:00.520 All right, speaking of

00:51:01.920 bullshit, Sean Hannity, I

00:51:05.100 guess, had to testify on

00:51:06.600 this Dominion lawsuit against

00:51:08.160 Fox News, and Sean Hannity

00:51:10.660 said about Trump's claims of

00:51:12.700 election fraud, quote, I did

00:51:14.840 not believe it for one

00:51:15.820 second.

00:51:20.020 Now, you might say to

00:51:21.620 yourself, well, what was I

00:51:22.860 watching for the last, if you

00:51:24.100 watched Hannity's show, you're

00:51:25.640 probably saying, what was I

00:51:26.560 watching for the last two

00:51:28.200 years or whatever since the

00:51:29.700 election?

00:51:30.520 One year.

00:51:32.320 Didn't it seem like he was

00:51:33.760 questioning the election?

00:51:34.980 Did it seem like it to you?

00:51:38.520 So the news is mocking

00:51:39.980 Hannity for saying that he

00:51:42.380 acted like he believed the

00:51:44.720 claims, but now when he's

00:51:47.120 under oath, he says he

00:51:48.880 doesn't.

00:51:49.840 Did you notice anything

00:51:50.780 missing in the stories?

00:51:52.580 Because there were a bunch of

00:51:53.300 reports on that.

00:51:53.980 Was anything missing?

00:51:56.380 Anything missing in the

00:51:57.600 story?

00:51:59.180 Yeah, like the evidence that

00:52:00.440 the story is true.

00:52:01.560 Now, it might be true, but

00:52:04.860 wouldn't you expect that that

00:52:05.960 kind of story would be

00:52:06.940 accompanied by an actual

00:52:09.160 quote by Hannity, where

00:52:10.980 Hannity was saying, I

00:52:12.680 believe what the president's

00:52:13.900 saying, and then you could

00:52:15.900 say, oh, shoot, he said the

00:52:17.200 opposite in court.

00:52:18.780 Where's that?

00:52:20.560 Where's the obvious clip

00:52:22.060 that, of course, they're

00:52:23.440 digging around all of his

00:52:24.640 enemies, and they would

00:52:25.920 produce it, that says

00:52:27.240 directly the opposite of what

00:52:29.240 he claimed under oath?

00:52:30.180 Huh, haven't seen it, have

00:52:32.560 you?

00:52:33.920 You haven't fucking seen it.

00:52:36.160 Now, I'm not saying it

00:52:36.940 doesn't exist, but there's

00:52:39.020 been enough time, right?

00:52:41.240 That shit takes one hour

00:52:42.580 before somebody's, you know,

00:52:44.340 created a compilation clip of

00:52:45.880 all the reasons you're lying.

00:52:47.600 If he's lying, if he said it

00:52:50.960 under court, the opposite of

00:52:52.400 what he said on TV, show it

00:52:54.160 to me.

00:52:55.360 Show it to me.

00:52:56.040 Why haven't I seen it?

00:53:00.880 Now, I think what people are

00:53:02.440 doing is they're conflating

00:53:04.080 that he gave air, he gave

00:53:06.680 oxygen to the complaints.

00:53:09.340 But having somebody on who's a 0.97

00:53:11.280 real person, who's in a real

00:53:13.120 position of authority, or even

00:53:14.720 a pundit who's a well-established

00:53:16.940 person, having them say what

00:53:18.880 they believe is true is not

00:53:21.040 exactly Hannity's fault, is it?

00:53:22.600 His show is having people on

00:53:25.720 with opinions and telling you

00:53:27.240 their opinion.

00:53:28.700 There are obviously some of

00:53:29.760 them are wrong, because it's 0.96

00:53:32.040 opinions.

00:53:33.060 Obviously, some of the opinion

00:53:34.260 people are wrong.

00:53:35.540 Is Hannity responsible for the

00:53:37.240 opinions that everybody has in

00:53:38.500 the show?

00:53:39.780 Like, in a general way, maybe.

00:53:42.580 But if he didn't say directly,

00:53:44.660 I believe these machines were

00:53:46.100 rigged, then all he did was tell

00:53:48.320 the truth twice.

00:53:50.020 That's all I see.

00:53:51.000 I see him telling the truth

00:53:52.640 twice.

00:53:54.280 Once when he didn't, you know,

00:53:57.200 take on the unsupported claim.

00:53:59.640 And once when he said, I never

00:54:00.920 took on that unsupported claim.

00:54:04.820 Now, here's another thing that's

00:54:06.120 getting conflated.

00:54:07.920 The Fox lawsuit is specifically

00:54:10.020 about the voting machines.

00:54:12.580 Right?

00:54:12.860 You know that, right?

00:54:13.540 It's not about all their claims.

00:54:15.620 It's about just the voting

00:54:16.500 machines.

00:54:16.880 I think it's very possible that

00:54:19.480 Hannity has never himself said

00:54:22.620 the voting machines are rigged.

00:54:24.860 He may have said, there's lots of

00:54:26.680 sketchy things here.

00:54:28.240 He may have said, we don't know.

00:54:30.440 He may have said, we're going to

00:54:31.980 talk to somebody who says they are.

00:54:34.300 He may have said a lot of things.

00:54:36.640 But if he never said, those things

00:54:40.080 are rigged, he's in the clear.

00:54:42.100 Because what does he tell you on the

00:54:44.420 regular?

00:54:45.580 I'm an opinion show.

00:54:48.540 If you tell people you're an opinion

00:54:50.260 show, you don't offer them fake

00:54:52.660 claims, you're in the clear.

00:54:56.780 I don't know.

00:54:58.280 I don't see anything there.

00:55:00.220 So we'll see what happens.

00:55:05.160 All right.

00:55:07.620 Here's the FBI's response to all the

00:55:10.020 Twitter files.

00:55:12.100 And they're really totally gaslighting

00:55:15.500 me.

00:55:16.920 When I read the FBI's response, it's

00:55:20.360 very disorienting because I tend to be

00:55:23.440 swimming in the claims.

00:55:25.320 So when you see the claims, they're so

00:55:28.400 different than what the FBI says is

00:55:30.720 the reality.

00:55:31.460 It's very disorienting.

00:55:33.180 And what the FBI says is it's just

00:55:36.260 normal business to tell companies there

00:55:39.420 might be somebody violating their terms

00:55:42.100 of service.

00:55:42.900 We never ask them to do anything.

00:55:44.800 We just give them information and they

00:55:46.880 act according to their terms of service.

00:55:50.600 Now, is that what you saw?

00:55:54.360 Did the Twitter files suggest that it was a

00:55:57.140 very ordinary routine contact?

00:55:59.660 That the payment for it is also routine.

00:56:03.640 That's routine because they're causing a

00:56:05.840 burden on the company.

00:56:07.340 So apparently there's some legislation that

00:56:09.180 allows the company to get reimbursed.

00:56:11.480 And so the FBI routinely reimburses because

00:56:14.240 that's the law.

00:56:15.740 The law says they can reimburse under those

00:56:17.720 situations.

00:56:18.720 They like following the law.

00:56:20.300 So they do.

00:56:20.840 So that's the FBI's version is this is all

00:56:24.640 normal.

00:56:25.620 We do it with other platforms.

00:56:27.860 We reimburse because we put a burden on

00:56:30.340 them.

00:56:31.000 We don't force them to do anything.

00:56:33.800 We just call out things that violated

00:56:36.960 terms of service.

00:56:41.140 Why is that their job?

00:56:44.480 Why is it the FBI's job to monitor Twitter's

00:56:48.300 terms of service?

00:56:49.080 Like, how does that even make sense?

00:56:52.020 But but when they say it in sort of an

00:56:54.220 ordinary way, your brain just goes, oh,

00:56:57.640 it's just ordinary business.

00:56:59.720 And it's very persuasive until you think

00:57:02.760 about it.

00:57:03.220 It's like, but why?

00:57:05.640 Well, why would that be ordinary

00:57:06.840 business?

00:57:08.440 And then you have the laptop situation,

00:57:13.600 which was a special case within the larger

00:57:17.600 association the FBI had with Twitter.

00:57:20.220 In that special case, the FBI was allegedly

00:57:23.740 warning them that there might be some, what

00:57:26.320 they said was fake information from the

00:57:28.740 Russians.

00:57:30.100 And were they obviously priming Twitter to

00:57:34.620 not believe the laptop story?

00:57:37.040 Well, it's not directly in evidence.

00:57:40.780 But it wouldn't be, right?

00:57:44.420 Because the FBI wouldn't say it directly.

00:57:47.520 So does it look for all the world like that's

00:57:50.700 exactly what they were doing?

00:57:52.640 Yes.

00:57:53.840 But here's the interesting part.

00:57:56.200 Did the did the FBI agents who were directly

00:57:58.740 working with Twitter, did they know what the

00:58:00.920 truth was?

00:58:02.160 And if they did, how would they know?

00:58:03.720 Like, how would those specific FBI agents know that

00:58:08.360 some people in the FBI who knew the truth were

00:58:12.400 lying to everybody?

00:58:13.560 Because it's not like the FBI was telling its

00:58:15.820 own people, hey, everybody, we're going to lie

00:58:17.740 about this.

00:58:20.100 The people in the FBI would have believed the

00:58:22.320 same lie, if there was a lie, from the FBI

00:58:25.780 management that the rest of us would have

00:58:27.980 believed.

00:58:29.180 Why would the rank and file not believe their own 0.66

00:58:31.740 management, if their own management says there's

00:58:33.980 nothing to see here, the FBI is going to say,

00:58:36.640 well, I trust them.

00:58:38.020 I know these guys.

00:58:39.040 They looked in.

00:58:39.560 There's nothing to see.

00:58:40.960 So there's no direct evidence that the FBI agents

00:58:44.380 who were directly dealing with Twitter were even

00:58:47.600 aware that they were doing anything wrong.

00:58:50.400 They may have been completely unaware of it.

00:58:54.780 Now, that still doesn't make it good or right.

00:58:57.800 It's too, the whole thing is too dirty to allow

00:59:01.600 to go on.

00:59:02.980 But the other thing we learned is that they do it

00:59:05.620 at other platforms.

00:59:09.520 Don't you think those other platforms have some

00:59:11.580 explaining to do?

00:59:13.260 And then I'm going to, here's a real question I asked

00:59:16.260 this morning on Twitter.

00:59:18.140 So if this is normal business, then the FBI has also

00:59:22.420 contacted Truth Social and is working on a regular

00:59:26.120 basis with Truth Social to let Truth Social know,

00:59:30.080 and this is very handy for Truth Social, if anything on

00:59:33.060 their platform has violated the Truth Social terms of

00:59:36.700 service.

00:59:38.720 So that's happened, right?

00:59:42.100 Wouldn't you like to know?

00:59:44.220 Wouldn't you like to know?

00:59:45.900 Yeah.

00:59:46.040 Does Getter, does Rumble, is FBI inserted with all the, let's 0.77

00:59:52.800 say, more free speech platforms?

00:59:56.000 You would say maybe right-leaning, but free speech as well.

01:00:01.600 Do you think the FBI has just as much, or they're trying to,

01:00:05.200 have they been rebuffed?

01:00:07.680 Did they try it with Rumble and Rumble said, no, get out of here?

01:00:10.480 Why don't we know that?

01:00:14.680 Just think about the fact of how obvious that question was.

01:00:19.700 Are they doing it with Truth?

01:00:21.360 Are they doing it with Rumble?

01:00:23.300 The most obvious question in the world.

01:00:26.120 Who asked besides me?

01:00:28.480 Who in the media asked that question?

01:00:32.220 It gets better.

01:00:34.580 Yeah, are they doing it for TikTok?

01:00:36.220 Now, for TikTok, we assume that they're not, because it's a

01:00:40.120 Chinese-owned company.

01:00:42.640 I mean, that's a good enough reason to say TikTok would be

01:00:44.920 different.

01:00:45.840 But do you know what we found out about Twitter recently as well?

01:00:51.620 We found out that our intelligence people were, with the

01:00:57.380 understanding and agreement of Twitter, were running fake

01:01:00.920 accounts on Twitter to influence foreign countries.

01:01:04.260 So Twitter and the FBI were working together, fully knowing what

01:01:10.340 each was doing, to build fake accounts on Twitter that would look

01:01:16.380 real and would influence people in the Middle East in particular.

01:01:22.320 Now, how many of you think that that should not happen?

01:01:26.840 Do you think that our intelligence agents should work with our

01:01:29.940 platforms to influence other countries?

01:01:33.560 Yes or no?

01:01:38.600 Yeah, I think you could argue either way on this one.

01:01:41.060 So now, this is confirmed, is my understanding.

01:01:48.560 This is a confirmed, nobody's questioning the facts of this, that our

01:01:53.600 intelligence did run ops on Twitter to persuade, you know, and the

01:02:00.980 persuasion would be illegitimate, because it's not real people, to

01:02:05.320 illegitimately persuade other countries and other publics in those

01:02:09.940 countries.

01:02:11.160 So we know that's happening.

01:02:13.440 So if the United States, with all of our awesomeness, and I think you'd

01:02:21.820 agree that our government is way more ethical and nice than the Chinese 1.00

01:02:28.280 government.

01:02:29.560 I mean, our government, they're straight shooters, right?

01:02:33.480 So if they're using the platform in their country to influence other

01:02:38.240 countries, it makes you wonder why nobody in China thought of that, huh?

01:02:43.580 Isn't that weird?

01:02:45.280 It was so obvious to our intelligence people that influencing a social media

01:02:51.020 platform was how you influence other countries.

01:02:53.940 It was so obvious to us.

01:02:55.820 And yet those dumb old Chinese, like a billion Chinese, and nobody thought of it. 1.00

01:03:01.380 And nobody thought of it.

01:03:03.740 Are you fucking kidding me?

01:03:06.040 Are you fucking kidding me?

01:03:07.500 Of course they thought of it.

01:03:09.120 Of course China's doing the same thing on TikTok.

01:03:12.100 Of fucking course.

01:03:14.320 You think we're the only ones who thought of it?

01:03:17.100 The fact that we're definitely doing it to China, using Twitter, in other words,

01:03:23.760 we're influencing in a way that's good for the United States and maybe not so good

01:03:27.000 for China.

01:03:28.560 You think they didn't think of it?

01:03:30.820 Like, are we so fucking stupid that we're supposed to sit here and go, oh, well, yeah,

01:03:36.560 of course our intelligence people thought of it.

01:03:39.020 Because the most influential thing in the world is our social media.

01:03:45.560 And we thought of it.

01:03:47.600 But there's a billion people in China who are all so fucking dumb that they never thought of it. 1.00

01:03:54.400 And so, citizens of the United States, you should be perfectly happy having TikTok in your country

01:04:01.340 because there's the logical explanation.

01:04:04.040 I tell you again, there is literally nobody in the United States government

01:04:14.320 on the side of keeping TikTok available in the United States.

01:04:20.160 None.

01:04:21.680 There's not one.

01:04:23.720 And we know that social media is used by the country that owns it to influence other countries,

01:04:29.800 illegitimately, because we do it.

01:04:31.980 Of course we do it.

01:04:33.320 Is there anybody here who thought we didn't do it?

01:04:37.420 Nobody.

01:04:38.860 But why do we act like maybe it's not happening on TikTok?

01:04:42.320 Oh, maybe it's not happening there.

01:04:44.660 But everybody's doing it everywhere else.

01:04:46.540 But not TikTok.

01:04:49.840 Do we even have a government?

01:04:52.860 So we have a government that completely abandoned its job on the omnibus bill.

01:04:59.980 We all agree with that.

01:05:01.200 The omnibus is how they abandoned doing their job, because they didn't have to make any decisions.

01:05:07.540 We look at the border, and what are they doing on the border?

01:05:11.060 They're trying to pretend nothing's happening.

01:05:14.360 Literally.

01:05:15.160 They're not doing it well.

01:05:16.720 They're not doing it poorly.

01:05:18.280 They're actually not doing it.

01:05:20.340 What are they doing on banning TikTok?

01:05:24.060 Well, there's no debate, because there doesn't need to be one, because everybody's on the same side.

01:05:30.620 What do you say about a government where everybody has the same opinion, and yet they don't act on such an important thing?

01:05:38.920 That would be not doing your job poorly.

01:05:41.940 That would not be doing your job well.

01:05:44.780 That would be not doing your job.

01:05:47.140 Am I right?

01:05:48.380 This is different from not doing your job well.

01:05:51.760 We're not talking about that.

01:05:54.400 That's no job done at all.

01:05:57.600 Fentanyl.

01:05:59.020 We know where it comes from.

01:06:01.020 We know how many people it's killing.

01:06:03.520 We know where, I'm sure we know, where the fentanyl is being produced.

01:06:07.420 And yet the people who are producing the fentanyl sit there undisturbed.

01:06:10.560 Do you don't think we could solve that problem?

01:06:15.360 Or at least put a dent in it?

01:06:17.640 But we're not doing it poorly, and we're not doing it well.

01:06:22.720 We're not doing it.

01:06:24.820 We're not trying.

01:06:27.020 I don't see...

01:06:27.920 All I see is that the people who already existed, the Border Patrol people being overwhelmed, that doesn't look like trying.

01:06:35.680 Right?

01:06:35.820 So, have you ever seen a situation quite like this, where Congress actually just stopped doing the job of Congress?

01:06:51.000 They just stopped.

01:06:52.900 And if you don't pay attention to each of these individual issues, and you don't realize that they stopped making decisions, they just stopped.

01:07:02.060 Did you hear Tucker the other day on his show, he said unambiguously, and I believe he would know this, right?

01:07:10.200 So he didn't give his sources or name any details.

01:07:13.020 But this would be one thing that you would know that a Tucker Carlson would know for sure.

01:07:19.240 Members of Congress are being blackmailed.

01:07:22.220 And he laughed and said, I'm not guessing, I know that for sure.

01:07:25.600 Do you think he knows that for sure?

01:07:27.620 I do.

01:07:29.140 I do.

01:07:29.540 And I'll bet that anybody in this position knows it for sure.

01:07:33.820 They may not say it, but I'll bet they all know it for sure.

01:07:37.420 They might even know the specific examples, probably.

01:07:40.960 They probably know specific examples.

01:07:44.500 Think about that.

01:07:47.140 So, something needs to happen, and I don't know how it can, because usually we use the government to fix the government.

01:07:56.420 And it looks like the government just stopped trying.

01:08:00.500 Normally, in that situation, you'd expect the public to rise up and maybe demand something.

01:08:05.380 Except the media keeps the public from rising, because it just keeps us divided and fighting about bullshit.

01:08:11.700 We're fighting about wokeness and pronouns and shit.

01:08:13.800 So, we don't have any mechanism for making Congress work.

01:08:19.840 There's no mechanism for that.

01:08:25.560 Here's how you could break it.

01:08:29.780 I'll say this until somebody does it.

01:08:32.020 You need a credible, well-run debate show where the public can learn what's true via the debate without having to depend on the fake news or bullshit on social media or the government, which are three entities we know will lie to us.

01:08:50.820 Now, a debate will also be maybe two liars, but if you do it right, you'll very quickly find out what's true and what's not.

01:08:59.880 Because the ideal debate format would be a strong host who will interrupt.

01:09:06.080 You need an interrupting host.

01:09:07.980 Because otherwise, somebody will just keep going on, and they're not addressing the fact.

01:09:12.000 You need an interrupting host.

01:09:13.840 You need unlimited time, so people aren't running out the clock.

01:09:18.600 Unlimited time.

01:09:19.300 And you need the people who are debating to have sitting right next to them with a laptop open a fact checker.

01:09:27.420 And here's how it goes.

01:09:29.040 One debater will say, and everybody knows X is true.

01:09:33.320 And then I, as the host, will go, oh, hold on.

01:09:36.140 I don't believe it's true that everybody would agree with that fact.

01:09:39.240 Fact checkers, give us a source.

01:09:41.780 And the fact checkers go, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

01:09:43.600 And maybe you edit it so that the time, you don't have to wait for the fact checkers.

01:09:49.300 So if you're watching it, you're watching a recorded version.

01:09:51.920 So quickly they check.

01:09:53.420 And the fact checkers say, oh, here's a source that says it's true.

01:09:57.920 Here's a source that says it's not.

01:09:59.380 And then the debaters have to debate about whether the quality of those sources is good.

01:10:04.240 Much better than anything we're seeing now.

01:10:07.180 Now, they might get hung up on, like, one little part of the debate and just go way down that well because they can't even decide on that one thing.

01:10:15.700 Fine.

01:10:16.780 Have two debates.

01:10:18.360 So maybe that day is only about that one fact.

01:10:21.060 But you need to have an open-ended as long as it takes model.

01:10:26.400 You need an interrupting host to interrupt a lot.

01:10:30.200 Oh, hold on.

01:10:31.880 Does that make sense to you?

01:10:34.040 Would you agree with that fact before he goes on with his point?

01:10:37.660 Right.

01:10:37.920 If you don't have an interrupting host and you just let people, like, talk for two minutes each or whatever, that's for a different purpose.

01:10:45.700 That would be like a good college debate or something because you're trying to make it fair.

01:10:52.060 But if you're actually trying to find out what's true versus what's not true, you need an interrupting, aggressive host to cut them off the moment they've departed the point, which they all try to do.

01:11:07.600 I see no way of educating the public so that the public could fix their government because the government won't fix it themselves.

01:11:16.340 Fake news won't tell you what's true.

01:11:18.280 It'll just keep us divided.

01:11:20.180 And social media just makes everything worse.

01:11:22.700 Would you agree?

01:11:24.140 There's no obvious system in place that would move the needle in any way.

01:11:32.780 But it could be.

01:11:34.940 It would have to be also provocative because nobody would watch a debate show if it were boring.

01:11:41.080 But if you had the right host, like me, for example, it would be interesting no matter what.

01:11:48.800 Like, even if you hated me, you'd still watch just to be mad at me.

01:11:53.900 All right.

01:11:54.140 Lee Fang, latest to write about the Twitter files.

01:11:58.020 He's the one who said that U.S. Central Command was using Twitter to influence other countries.

01:12:04.940 Sure enough.

01:12:09.260 Robert F. Kennedy Jr. tweeted this about Tucker's claim that the CIA was involved with the Kennedy assassination.

01:12:18.920 So this, remember, this is Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

01:12:22.860 And he says, the most courageous newscast in 60 years.

01:12:26.680 The CIA's murder of my uncle was a successful coup d'etat from which our democracy has never recovered.

01:12:33.180 So Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is completely accepting the CIA involvement in his uncle's death.

01:12:43.800 That's pretty gussy.

01:12:45.180 Yeah, is what you're saying.

01:12:46.780 I'll say, I've not always agreed with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., but I'm no longer doubting his braveness.

01:12:54.600 I guess that question's been settled.

01:12:56.920 But here's what Tucker did say, and I'm going to question your interpretation of it.

01:13:01.500 He said that he talked to a source that he doesn't tell us.

01:13:08.840 All right, so he has an unnamed source.

01:13:11.100 How reliable is an unnamed source?

01:13:14.480 Close to zero, right?

01:13:16.540 Close to zero.

01:13:17.900 But in this one case, we're not relying entirely on the source, are we?

01:13:22.980 Because we're also relying on Tucker to have vetted the source for us, which is a big, that's a big trust, right?

01:13:31.920 Because Tucker's the one who's telling us.

01:13:34.800 So if he's not good at vetting the source, well, you're in trouble, if you believe him.

01:13:41.020 If he's good at vetting the source, then he's adding some credibility.

01:13:44.920 Like it might be somebody he knows personally, has known for a long time.

01:13:48.500 It might be somebody he knows is a straight shooter.

01:13:50.760 So you have to put your credibility on Tucker, which is one level, like, extended from the source.

01:14:00.640 So you're already in a little sketchy territory, right?

01:14:04.120 But let's say that you believe Tucker would not lie about a thing like that.

01:14:09.700 And I think that's true.

01:14:11.620 There's nothing about Tucker that would suggest he would tell you some kind of direct lie.

01:14:16.380 Or even if it was a sketchy claim, that he would, like, spin it so it sounded more believable than it was.

01:14:24.620 He doesn't really give off that vibe.

01:14:27.220 But what was the exact thing that he quoted his sources saying?

01:14:30.880 Let me read it to you.

01:14:31.860 Quote, yes, comma, I believe the CIA was involved in the killing of Kennedy.

01:14:39.020 Do you see any flags in that statement?

01:14:42.240 I'll read it again.

01:14:43.660 Really pay attention to the exact wording.

01:14:46.760 Yes, I believe the CIA was involved in the killing of Kennedy.

01:14:52.340 I believe and involved.

01:14:56.340 Those two words tell you that this person does not have direct information.

01:15:00.140 It's a belief.

01:15:03.500 It's just a belief.

01:15:05.540 And when he says the CIA was involved, that could mean absolutely anything.

01:15:10.340 Involved could mean anything.

01:15:13.580 So it sounds like a source who was telling the truth, they were telling the truth.

01:15:19.280 The source personally believed.

01:15:22.640 And it's probably also true, probably also true that in some way, the CIA had some involvement.

01:15:29.160 Which doesn't mean they knew it was going to happen.

01:15:32.020 Doesn't mean they caused it.

01:15:33.680 I mean, it might have been some tangential involvement.

01:15:38.400 Yeah, and maybe the shooter was a CIA agent at one point.

01:15:44.340 Or an asset.

01:15:46.580 But that doesn't necessarily mean that's why the assassination took place.

01:15:50.480 So involved is doing a lot of lifting here, right?

01:15:52.980 So, does Robert F. Kennedy Jr. know more than Tucker knows?

01:16:03.320 Does he have his own information?

01:16:04.840 He probably does, right?

01:16:06.140 Don't you think that the Kennedy family knows a little bit more than you do about the whole thing?

01:16:11.920 Probably.

01:16:13.680 So, I don't know what to think about that.

01:16:15.560 I don't discount the CIA involvement.

01:16:19.000 I will just say that that's not an evidence.

01:16:22.100 It's not an evidence.

01:16:23.640 So, Tucker saying that somebody who won't tell you about, believes something, was involved in something, has the evidential value of zero.

01:16:35.960 Zero.

01:16:38.140 I know, I hate that.

01:16:39.580 I hate that.

01:16:40.240 I would love for this to be credible.

01:16:43.700 Yeah, and 60 years ago, right?

01:16:45.600 Right.

01:16:46.580 How old is the guy who has knowledge of it 60 years ago?

01:16:53.340 And then Tucker made the claim that I think is accurate, that all of the heads of the CIA must know the truth.

01:17:02.740 And he said that that would include Mike Pompeo, who he says, you know, Tucker says he has a friendly, good feeling about, but that that would implicate Pompeo as one of the people who's hiding from you the truth.

01:17:19.580 Now, here's what I think.

01:17:26.100 Would Pompeo not tell you the truth?

01:17:29.440 Do you think Pompeo would know that the CIA was, you know, directly behind the assassination?

01:17:34.580 Do you think he would know that from having been there and then decided not to tell you?

01:17:42.200 Possible.

01:17:43.400 It's possible.

01:17:44.820 Yep.

01:17:46.200 Totally possible.

01:17:47.100 Because what it might do is throw the CIA into such disarray that you couldn't possibly lead it if the first thing you did was tear it apart that way.

01:17:59.480 So it could be people making just practical, real-world decisions that, damn it, they'd love you to know, but it would be so destructive to the CIA that, for the good of the country, you don't want to destroy the CIA.

01:18:14.360 You could imagine a head of the CIA having a complicated opinion about this.

01:18:21.580 Yeah.

01:18:22.620 And there might be a sources and methods issue, too, right?

01:18:26.940 All right.

01:18:27.620 There is nothing funnier than Trump's tax returns being available, and here's what we found.

01:18:33.060 You know the ridiculous claim that Trump was making?

01:18:36.300 That he was waiting for the audit, and the audit was taking forever?

01:18:41.540 Like, he didn't want to release his tax returns until they'd been audited?

01:18:46.180 And what did you say to yourself?

01:18:47.740 Well, that's an obvious lie.

01:18:49.800 You know, nothing takes that long.

01:18:52.560 So here's what we found out.

01:18:54.840 Apparently, the auditor sent one guy aside to it.

01:18:58.900 Yeah, they've been working on it since 2015.

01:19:05.060 They've been working on his tax returns since 2015, and here's the funny part.

01:19:09.880 They're not even close.

01:19:11.960 They're nowhere near being close to have examined them.

01:19:17.400 Because here's the funniest part.

01:19:19.160 The people who prepare the taxes are high-end accountants.

01:19:24.800 The people who audit them are low-end functionaries, and they don't even understand them.

01:19:33.000 The auditors were so under-trained that they asked Trump's tax preparers if they did it right,

01:19:41.320 and the tax preparers said some version of, oh, yeah, we did this so right.

01:19:46.940 You know, I'm glad you asked.

01:19:49.900 We totally nailed it.

01:19:52.840 That was the audit.

01:19:54.700 The audit was one untrained guy asking Trump's accountants if they did it right,

01:20:00.080 and them saying, yeah, we totally did this right.

01:20:03.020 And then the remaining stuff is a whole bunch of things for which they have questions about,

01:20:08.760 but they've had questions about forever,

01:20:12.600 and they don't seem to have any answers that would be illegal.

01:20:15.880 Like nothing.

01:20:17.840 There's absolutely nothing in his tax returns so far.

01:20:22.880 Nothing.

01:20:26.500 I love this.

01:20:28.280 I fucking love that there's nothing in there.

01:20:31.720 Now, I'm not saying that they won't find anything.

01:20:34.640 A big, complicated billionaire tax thing.

01:20:37.200 You'd have to assume that the accountants took some, you know, obvious deductions.

01:20:46.260 But if they're good accountants, they also took some gray areas.

01:20:50.000 Do you know why a good accountant would take a deduction in a gray area?

01:20:53.540 Because that's what a good accountant does.

01:20:56.340 If there's an argument to be made, you don't go to jail.

01:21:01.240 By the way, did you know that?

01:21:03.740 If you have high-paid accountants, and they say to you, you know, I could see that an audit would kick this up,

01:21:11.440 but we have an argument for doing it.

01:21:13.720 You do not go to jail for that.

01:21:16.800 There only has to be an argument from a qualified person, and then the IRS says, well, we don't allow it, so there's going to be a penalty because we didn't allow it.

01:21:27.220 But if you have the right accountants, they take those deductions, because it's always better to take your chances.

01:21:35.800 And if you have to pay back a 10% penalty for a few years, it's probably still a better bet than not taking it all.

01:21:42.980 Because we can see in this specific case that the auditors, they don't even penetrate entire topics within it because they're too complicated.

01:21:52.420 So there'll be, like, specific deductions of, like, hundreds of millions of dollars that change everything.

01:21:58.740 And the auditors are like, ah, I don't even know how to evaluate that.

01:22:03.540 Because you would need a specialty for each of these pockets, and the auditors are not specialists.

01:22:11.220 And they didn't have any help.

01:22:13.680 So it was actually true that it was taking years to get audited.

01:22:18.360 And it was all because the IRS didn't have the capability.

01:22:23.700 That is hilarious.

01:22:26.820 And literally not one confirmed illegal thing in all of that, from 2015 until now, haven't found a single thing that's sort of an obvious problem.

01:22:38.920 The only things they found are gray areas.

01:22:41.540 And yes, those accountants should have taken every one of the gray areas.

01:22:45.500 Every one.

01:22:45.980 So all they found so far is he has good accountants.

01:22:49.520 That's it.

01:22:50.740 Bottom line.

01:22:51.660 Summary.

01:22:52.600 Oh, turns out Trump hires really good accountants.

01:22:57.280 That's literally the whole story.

01:22:59.540 That's the summary.

01:23:00.920 That's the only thing they know.

01:23:03.600 Everything else is, you know, if we looked into this area, maybe we'd find something wrong with it.

01:23:11.120 That's it?

01:23:11.840 Maybe there'd be something wrong if we looked into it, and if we understood it, but we don't.

01:23:18.220 That's it.

01:23:21.640 So, I don't know.

01:23:23.180 I love this part of the story.

01:23:25.840 Let's talk about Arizona and Maricopa and Carrie Lake's situation there.

01:23:31.380 I have a conspiracy theory I'd like to put into the mix.

01:23:41.400 Now, I don't have direct evidence that this is true.

01:23:45.000 What I have is a pattern.

01:23:47.700 And the pattern is this.

01:23:49.500 Do you remember when Sidney Powell was making her ridiculous claims about the voting machines?

01:23:54.440 Now, just for a historical context, I did believe that she would have a kraken.

01:24:02.420 In other words, I did believe that when she stood in front of the public and said, oh, I have the goods,

01:24:08.440 I believe she was credible, and she would not have made that claim unless she had the goods.

01:24:13.980 She did not.

01:24:14.880 So, I was 100% wrong about that.

01:24:19.340 Don't you love it when I tell you I'm 100% wrong?

01:24:22.280 Totally wrong.

01:24:23.340 But don't conflate that.

01:24:25.140 Don't conflate that with a related claim that the voting machines themselves were rigged.

01:24:31.320 When I heard that claim, if you recall, I said on moment one, bullshit, bullshit, bullshit.

01:24:36.960 There's no Venezuelan general.

01:24:39.960 This story is so obviously false.

01:24:43.000 Right?

01:24:43.140 I confirm that when she came up with the Venezuelan general story, I said, no, no, no, no.

01:24:49.000 Like, from the first moment, I said, that's not true.

01:24:52.940 And it was not true.

01:24:55.760 Where do you think that rumor came from?

01:24:59.500 Where do you think the rumor that the voting machines and there was a Venezuelan general came from?

01:25:04.840 Is that the sort of thing that, let's say, you'd hear from who?

01:25:13.140 Yeah.

01:25:17.000 It might be exactly what you thought of.

01:25:19.160 Now, why would somebody start a rumor that the election was rigged when those very people would want you to believe the opposite?

01:25:28.140 Why would they start an election that was rigged when they totally don't want you to think that?

01:25:33.060 Because if they can draw all your attention to the thing that is obviously bullshit, that's all you'll remember.

01:25:42.680 And every time that another claim is made, they'll say, uh-huh, is it a Kraken?

01:25:49.440 Is it a Kraken?

01:25:51.220 How about that last Kraken?

01:25:53.540 Pretty credible, huh?

01:25:55.480 Sure.

01:25:56.540 You're full of Krakens, Scott. 0.95

01:25:58.780 Oh, yeah.

01:25:59.380 Carrie Lake has a good claim this time? 1.00

01:26:01.420 You sure?

01:26:02.320 So did Sidney Powell.

01:26:04.680 So did the Kraken.

01:26:06.460 Where's the Kraken?

01:26:07.540 Where's the Kraken, Scott?

01:26:08.680 To me, it looks like an op.

01:26:14.140 So that's what I'm going to add to the conspiracy theories.

01:26:17.480 To me, it looks like an obvious op.

01:26:20.180 Because if they knew they had been caught red-handed, this would be a speculation, right?

01:26:24.880 If the Democrats knew they had been caught red-handed, how would they handle it?

01:26:31.000 They're totally going to get caught rigging an election, hypothetically.

01:26:35.180 They would create a false flag that would draw all your attention to a ridiculous claim of election fraud that could be easily disproven, would discredit Fox News totally, which is what's happening right now.

01:26:50.540 And they would never have to answer for it, because it would take all the energy to the thing that was bullshit.

01:26:58.400 Now, who even has information about a Venezuelan general?

01:27:03.160 Huh.

01:27:04.420 Who in the government would have information about a Venezuelan general?

01:27:10.740 There's only one fucking place that could have come from.

01:27:14.960 There's only one place that came from.

01:27:17.820 I mean, directly or indirectly, that's somebody who deals with other countries on behalf of the United States.

01:27:28.560 I mean, I'm speculating, right?

01:27:31.540 I'm just speculating.

01:27:33.180 Don't have direct evidence.

01:27:34.780 But it sure looks like an op.

01:27:36.960 It sure looks like it.

01:27:39.060 So that brings us back to Carrie Lake.

01:27:41.240 And her claims, among others, are that, from witnesses, that a lot of the ballots were printed at the wrong size.

01:27:53.200 So I guess the paper was the right size, but you can print on the paper a ballot that's skinnier or fatter.

01:27:59.700 And if you tell your machine to print the wrong kind, they won't be counted through the machines, and it blows up the system, which is what happened.

01:28:10.320 Now, why do you think, or what do you think was the cause of all those misprinted ballots?

01:28:17.060 Well, the people who run the elections say, oops, we made a mistake.

01:28:24.920 And so far, that is not disproved.

01:28:29.620 The mistake hypothesis is not disproved.

01:28:33.340 It's just hard to believe.

01:28:36.400 It's, like, really hard to believe.

01:28:38.020 Because, apparently, only an administrator could make that change, and all the machines had been tested the day before.

01:28:46.980 Well, what did they test on the machines?

01:28:50.200 Did they test real ballots?

01:28:52.640 Maybe they had, like, test ballots, and they ran them through the machine, but the test ballots did not match the actual ballots.

01:29:00.520 How about whoever printed the ballots?

01:29:02.920 Was there anybody double-checking to see that the ballots had been printed, and that those ballots could go through a machine?

01:29:10.880 Well, here's where it gets a little sketchy, doesn't it?

01:29:14.900 It feels like it's the sort of thing that should have been checked.

01:29:20.200 Your common sense says they would have checked the printing, they would have checked the machines,

01:29:26.340 and then they would have checked the printing with the machines.

01:29:29.360 And that all of that would have been done the days before the election,

01:29:33.440 and then once those things are checked, then nobody can touch the machine again, right?

01:29:38.840 Very basic, common sense, obvious process.

01:29:42.760 So do you think elections match your common sense, obvious process?

01:29:47.600 Well, let me give you a little more information of something that happened in Maricopa.

01:29:51.600 Now, this is based on witness testimony, that when the individual precincts gather up all the ballots,

01:29:59.620 and they send them to the central place,

01:30:02.520 they don't count how many they have before they send them.

01:30:10.940 Just think about that.

01:30:13.480 They don't count how many they have before they send them.

01:30:18.240 Now, if I had asked you, hey, it's up to you to develop a system,

01:30:28.540 would you have ever imagined that could be true?

01:30:31.740 Because I've thought about it.

01:30:33.600 In the past, I thought, I wonder if they just compare the local totals to the total totals

01:30:40.580 to make sure they got all the ballots.

01:30:42.580 And then, you know what I said to myself?

01:30:45.920 I said, I'm not going to raise that in front of the public.

01:30:50.200 Do you know why?

01:30:51.420 Why would I not ask that question in front of you?

01:30:56.740 Because it would make me look like a fucking idiot.

01:31:00.300 Of course they do that.

01:31:03.080 Of course.

01:31:03.880 The most obvious basic maintenance of security in an election would be

01:31:11.380 you count them at every step that anything can be counted.

01:31:15.560 Not just that step, but every transfer from the physical ballots to the machines,

01:31:23.020 from the pile that's counted to another source,

01:31:26.940 from that source to the storeroom.

01:31:29.580 Every time you move them, you move them with a count.

01:31:34.520 Everybody knows that.

01:31:36.380 Every one of you would have done it that way.

01:31:39.580 But experts actually testified that it was their process to not do the one thing you would need

01:31:48.140 as a citizen to trust your election.

01:31:50.800 It's the one thing you need done.

01:31:52.760 Like, all the other stuff is important, too.

01:31:54.700 But knowing that you sent all the ballots to be counted,

01:31:59.880 that's as basic as you can get.

01:32:03.000 You can't get more basic than that.

01:32:05.680 Now, tell me a second reason why they wouldn't do it.

01:32:12.400 One reason would be it gives them an opportunity for fraud.

01:32:17.160 That would be one obvious reason.

01:32:18.660 What would be another reason?

01:32:20.920 Too lazy?

01:32:21.780 I don't think laziness is a factor because when they hire people,

01:32:26.800 they tell them what to do, and they do all the other stuff.

01:32:30.660 You know, being a poll worker is like a lot of work.

01:32:34.180 They're the opposite of lazy, aren't they?

01:32:37.820 I mean, the poll workers look like they're really in there for the right reasons

01:32:41.540 they're putting in the hours.

01:32:43.700 I don't think they're lazy.

01:32:45.540 You don't think that if the rule came down,

01:32:47.760 these must be counted before you send them.

01:32:49.720 You don't think they would do that?

01:32:55.800 Now, it might be hard,

01:32:57.840 but if you don't do that, you really didn't have an election you could trust.

01:33:01.980 So let me say this as clearly as possible.

01:33:04.060 If that's true,

01:33:05.740 that they're not counted at the precinct level

01:33:07.640 before they go to a central counting place,

01:33:09.680 then there was no election.

01:33:11.660 You can't even say there was an election.

01:33:13.260 The only thing you could say for sure is that there were a bunch of ballots

01:33:17.460 that got counted at the end point.

01:33:20.180 If that's all you know,

01:33:21.900 and there's no chain of custody,

01:33:24.080 there was no election.

01:33:26.500 See, in the same way that I say

01:33:28.400 you can't judge Congress for doing a bad job,

01:33:32.300 they're not doing any job.

01:33:34.740 Not doing any job.

01:33:35.780 Likewise, you cannot say the election was rigged or not rigged.

01:33:42.020 There wasn't an election.

01:33:45.320 I'm going to say that directly.

01:33:47.720 If you didn't control the chain of custody,

01:33:51.340 and it wasn't a mistake,

01:33:53.900 it was the process.

01:33:55.560 The actual process was don't control the number of votes.

01:33:59.060 What would you call an election

01:34:03.220 where the process says don't count the votes

01:34:06.800 at important stages of the votes?

01:34:09.440 It's not an election.

01:34:11.340 What would that be?

01:34:13.620 An installation.

01:34:14.960 Right.

01:34:15.540 So I think that people who are election deniers

01:34:19.000 should be denying that an election happened.

01:34:22.720 They shouldn't be denying the outcome.

01:34:25.140 So I would say if you deny the outcome,

01:34:27.660 you're in sketchy territory.

01:34:29.400 If you say, well, it's not really an election

01:34:31.640 if you're not counting the votes

01:34:33.100 before you send them to the central place,

01:34:35.680 then you say, all right, well, once again,

01:34:37.460 we had a government that chose not to have an election.

01:34:40.980 Now, I always accept the elections

01:34:43.900 because you need to move on.

01:34:45.660 So I accept it, and I did accept it on day one

01:34:48.480 and continue to accept it.

01:34:50.240 But there was no election.

01:34:52.340 There was no election.

01:34:53.380 If that fact is true, there was no election.

01:34:59.860 True or false?

01:35:01.720 I see nobody disagreeing with me.

01:35:04.940 Right?

01:35:05.540 100% agreement.

01:35:07.340 Because this is not politics.

01:35:10.200 If you said to a Democrat,

01:35:12.420 you put a Democrat in the room,

01:35:13.480 say, all right, here's the process.

01:35:14.600 Get all these ballots,

01:35:16.960 and then we send them to a central place,

01:35:18.540 but we don't count them before we send them.

01:35:20.900 Do you think there's a Democrat,

01:35:22.180 even one, who would say,

01:35:24.800 okay, that sounds like a valid election?

01:35:27.900 Anybody?

01:35:28.260 This has nothing to do with politics.

01:35:31.200 It wouldn't matter who won, who didn't win.

01:35:34.560 Not counting the ballots

01:35:36.080 at that important stage of the process

01:35:39.060 is no election at all.

01:35:41.180 None at all.

01:35:41.780 The legislator makes the rules,

01:35:47.120 so they need to plug the holes, probably.

01:35:51.120 But just because the states

01:35:53.780 can run the elections any way they want,

01:35:56.560 so that would make it legal,

01:35:58.440 that doesn't mean that they chose to do it.

01:36:01.640 So in other words,

01:36:02.320 the fact that the state has a right

01:36:03.660 to run an election

01:36:04.580 according to their own laws,

01:36:06.980 that doesn't mean they did it.

01:36:11.240 It means they did something,

01:36:13.020 but I wouldn't call it an election.

01:36:15.900 I would not call that an election.

01:36:18.420 It was something else.

01:36:21.240 But I wouldn't call it fraud.

01:36:24.080 See, here's where you go wrong.

01:36:26.100 If you call it fraud,

01:36:28.020 then you're accepting

01:36:28.780 there was something like an election that happened.

01:36:31.300 I don't see it.

01:36:33.460 You can't have a fraud of an election

01:36:35.220 that didn't happen.

01:36:36.980 You can just have something that didn't happen.

01:36:39.720 So I think we keep getting fooled

01:36:41.580 into thinking

01:36:42.320 that our government is doing a good or bad job,

01:36:45.320 and then we argue it.

01:36:47.020 Oh, I think it was good.

01:36:48.400 I think it was bad.

01:36:50.140 Nothing like that's happening.

01:36:52.280 There's actually just no governing happening.

01:36:54.840 So the only complaint you should have

01:36:56.580 is that no governing is happening.

01:37:01.380 Such wise double talk, Scott,

01:37:03.360 so you can avoid being a Joe Blow.

01:37:06.980 Oh, somebody's asking if I'm a denier.

01:37:13.080 Yes.

01:37:14.320 Yes.

01:37:15.080 As of yesterday.

01:37:16.780 So before yesterday,

01:37:18.660 I was not an election denier

01:37:20.320 because I didn't have evidence

01:37:22.100 that seemed credible.

01:37:25.280 But now we have a court testimony

01:37:27.460 from somebody who was in the right place

01:37:29.520 that the way the process worked

01:37:31.600 was not close enough to being an election.

01:37:35.720 So I can say,

01:37:36.920 now I can say,

01:37:37.780 based on that,

01:37:39.420 based on that,

01:37:40.580 no election happened.

01:37:42.580 So yeah,

01:37:43.040 I would be an election denier,

01:37:45.080 but not the standard kind.

01:37:47.320 I'm not denying just the outcome.

01:37:49.620 I'm denying the election itself.

01:37:52.000 That the election itself

01:37:53.160 was just smoke and mirrors,

01:37:54.320 and no actual election happened.

01:37:56.160 Nothing like that happened.

01:38:00.460 Yeah.

01:38:03.500 So let's see if I can demonetize,

01:38:06.520 because I'm saying this directly as you could.

01:38:08.580 Based on yesterday's court evidence,

01:38:11.760 court evidence,

01:38:13.120 it looks like no election happened

01:38:14.600 by my definition of what would be

01:38:16.840 the minimum requirement

01:38:18.580 to say an election happened.

01:38:20.020 We didn't hit the minimum.

01:38:21.800 So will I be gone tomorrow?

01:38:23.100 Do you think there's somebody

01:38:25.260 at YouTube right now

01:38:26.140 who's having a real tough time with me?

01:38:28.280 Or they will

01:38:28.880 when the human reviews this?

01:38:30.680 Because this will be demonetized

01:38:32.040 in half a second.

01:38:33.460 That's why I'm going to rumble.

01:38:37.320 But I'm saying as directly

01:38:38.700 as you could say,

01:38:41.460 no election happened,

01:38:42.460 I deny the election.

01:38:43.920 But I do accept the outcome.

01:38:46.540 I do accept the outcome.

01:38:48.000 Because you have to have some stability,

01:38:51.300 you have to move forward.

01:38:52.100 Now we need to fix this

01:38:53.800 so it doesn't happen again.

01:38:56.240 You've got to do that.

01:38:57.780 But I can deny the election now

01:38:59.460 with no qualms.

01:39:04.160 Yes, Joe Blow,

01:39:05.140 I am a denier.

01:39:06.400 That is correct.

01:39:07.960 As of today.

01:39:09.980 But I'll defend myself

01:39:12.040 from holding off till now,

01:39:13.940 because this is the first

01:39:15.380 highly credible information

01:39:17.400 I've seen

01:39:18.140 that tells me

01:39:19.860 it wasn't a real election.

01:39:22.100 somebody says,

01:39:24.520 you can't accept the results.

01:39:26.900 Well, that makes the word

01:39:29.160 accept do too much work.

01:39:31.720 I can decide to move on

01:39:33.600 so that the country

01:39:34.960 doesn't come to a screeching halt,

01:39:36.720 which is different

01:39:37.800 from accepting the results.

01:39:39.520 You can accept the system

01:39:40.940 without accepting the results.

01:39:42.480 The legislation is fine.

01:39:48.060 It was not followed,

01:39:48.960 somebody says.

01:39:50.020 That seems more likely,

01:39:51.460 but I don't know

01:39:52.400 that that's proven.

01:39:53.680 Does anybody know

01:39:54.600 if Maricopa

01:39:57.080 was legally required

01:39:58.820 to count them

01:39:59.440 before they sent them

01:40:00.260 to the central site?

01:40:02.720 Do we have a fact check on that?

01:40:05.540 I see some yeses.

01:40:07.200 But are you using common sense

01:40:08.820 or did you see it factually?

01:40:12.240 Common sense says,

01:40:13.440 of course,

01:40:13.740 they were required.

01:40:15.220 But I don't know

01:40:15.760 if it's factually true.

01:40:17.680 Has it been demonstrated?

01:40:19.740 It was stated in the trial,

01:40:21.020 somebody says.

01:40:21.600 Okay.

01:40:22.700 All right, good.

01:40:24.620 Now, what would you do

01:40:25.700 if you were the court?

01:40:27.460 This is a real good question.

01:40:29.000 Suppose the court

01:40:30.060 accepts the testimony

01:40:31.820 as true.

01:40:32.640 Is it a jury trial

01:40:35.900 or a judge trial?

01:40:38.460 It's a judge trial, right?

01:40:40.080 It's a judge trial.

01:40:42.440 So suppose the judge

01:40:43.900 accepts that it was

01:40:45.720 legislatively required

01:40:47.500 that they count them

01:40:49.120 at the precinct level,

01:40:50.500 but they didn't do it.

01:40:53.480 At this late stage of the game,

01:40:55.780 even if all the facts

01:40:56.980 are accepted,

01:40:58.460 could that judge

01:40:59.160 reverse anything?

01:40:59.860 Or is it not that late?

01:41:03.460 Could he order a redo?

01:41:08.360 I think they can order a redo,

01:41:10.920 but you think it would happen

01:41:11.720 at this late date?

01:41:15.240 Katie Hobbs is not sworn in yet?

01:41:18.320 Is that true?

01:41:21.120 Could call a runoff?

01:41:25.160 Interesting.

01:41:25.860 Okay.

01:41:26.880 Well,

01:41:27.720 and is the judge,

01:41:29.000 do we know which way

01:41:29.600 the judge leans,

01:41:31.020 Republican or Democrat?

01:41:33.540 Is the judge a leaner,

01:41:35.100 or we don't know

01:41:35.780 anything about the judge?

01:41:37.740 The judge is Republican.

01:41:41.660 Are you sure?

01:41:44.860 Cernovich says a redo. 0.94

01:41:48.100 Judges are impartial.

01:41:50.920 Courts have ordered

01:41:51.820 new elections before,

01:41:53.140 but if they ordered it

01:41:54.020 in a Senate election

01:41:55.740 or a governor election,

01:41:57.960 has it been ordered

01:42:00.180 at the highest level?

01:42:02.380 I feel like that's something

01:42:03.700 that happens to a state

01:42:05.100 representative or something.

01:42:07.260 Yes,

01:42:07.580 in Arizona.

01:42:08.840 Okay.

01:42:09.860 All right,

01:42:10.060 so it is possible.

01:42:11.340 So one possibility

01:42:12.180 is that there could be

01:42:13.620 a redo

01:42:14.000 because the evidence

01:42:16.100 is sort of leaning

01:42:16.820 in that direction.

01:42:20.140 Oh,

01:42:20.600 long hair.

01:42:21.380 Oh,

01:42:21.540 interesting.

01:42:21.840 Interesting.

01:42:21.900 Interesting.

01:42:21.920 Interesting.

01:42:21.940 Interesting.

01:42:21.980 Interesting.

01:42:22.000 It was a super,

01:42:32.480 super Scott.

01:42:33.540 What?

01:42:35.600 There is precedent

01:42:36.640 at the governor's level,

01:42:37.900 somebody says.

01:42:38.720 All right,

01:42:39.020 well,

01:42:39.220 I would accept that.

01:42:40.180 I'll accept that

01:42:40.980 if the,

01:42:43.360 but let me ask you this.

01:42:45.220 Is there precedent

01:42:46.260 only when fraud was proven,

01:42:48.180 or is there precedent

01:42:50.440 when you don't know

01:42:51.420 if fraud happened,

01:42:52.200 but it might have?

01:42:54.000 That is different.

01:42:55.460 Because if the judge says,

01:42:57.380 well,

01:42:57.760 there definitely was

01:42:58.700 an opening for fraud

01:43:00.000 because of the way

01:43:00.580 you handled it,

01:43:02.140 but you can't prove it.

01:43:04.300 If he can't prove it,

01:43:05.580 I'll bet he can't order

01:43:06.360 a redo.

01:43:07.940 Do you think he could,

01:43:08.840 do you think a judge

01:43:09.580 could order a redo

01:43:10.560 absent crime?

01:43:14.400 And it's the only procedure.

01:43:19.660 Could he?

01:43:20.440 Maybe not.

01:43:25.660 He would say,

01:43:26.380 no intent.

01:43:28.080 Yeah,

01:43:28.240 if there's no intention

01:43:29.560 and no proof of a crime,

01:43:32.280 he'd probably just say,

01:43:33.260 let it go

01:43:33.620 and fix it next time,

01:43:34.720 wouldn't he?

01:43:36.160 I feel like that's what

01:43:37.180 I would do

01:43:37.520 if I were a judge.

01:43:39.080 Like,

01:43:39.480 even if I was sure

01:43:40.580 that this is sketchy

01:43:41.680 as hell, 0.91

01:43:42.380 but it's not proven,

01:43:44.080 it's just sketchy

01:43:44.860 as hell, 0.91

01:43:45.840 I'd say,

01:43:46.500 all right,

01:43:46.980 you're going to have

01:43:47.420 to live with it.

01:43:48.680 Better fix it next time.

01:43:49.740 That's what I would do.

01:43:52.580 Which I hate.

01:43:53.920 Like,

01:43:54.160 I hate that that's

01:43:54.900 how I would decide,

01:43:56.240 but that's what I'd do.

01:43:58.400 Because I think

01:43:59.160 the judges

01:43:59.640 try to take a,

01:44:01.240 you know,

01:44:01.580 a larger view

01:44:02.500 of social disruption,

01:44:04.300 and I don't think

01:44:05.980 I would,

01:44:07.040 probably wouldn't

01:44:07.740 disrupt the system

01:44:08.680 for this.

01:44:11.640 Like,

01:44:11.900 it's an edge case.

01:44:13.740 I mean,

01:44:14.080 you could certainly

01:44:14.700 make an argument for it.

01:44:16.200 Certainly.

01:44:17.400 But I think a judge

01:44:18.520 is going to go

01:44:18.940 the other way.

01:44:23.360 What do the

01:44:24.160 real smart lawyers say? 0.59

01:44:25.480 That's a good question.

01:44:26.160 Why does defense

01:44:31.820 keep asking witnesses

01:44:32.860 if they have evidence

01:44:33.880 of intent?

01:44:36.740 Because intent matters,

01:44:38.160 right?

01:44:42.000 Barnes was laughing it up.

01:44:43.320 So,

01:44:47.820 what would you assume

01:44:49.000 about Trump's claims

01:44:50.520 of the election

01:44:51.120 being rigged

01:44:51.840 if you found out

01:44:53.640 that this election,

01:44:55.560 we don't know

01:44:55.980 if it's rigged,

01:44:57.160 but the votes

01:44:58.160 weren't counted

01:44:58.700 at the precinct level,

01:45:00.240 and it got overturned

01:45:01.880 because of that?

01:45:05.380 I have a feeling

01:45:06.560 that Carrie Lake

01:45:07.340 is going to prove

01:45:08.160 Trump right

01:45:08.880 without proving

01:45:10.360 he's right.

01:45:10.880 In other words,

01:45:12.460 your brain,

01:45:13.500 if Carrie Lake prevails,

01:45:15.940 and let's say

01:45:16.680 she actually

01:45:17.240 goes all the way

01:45:18.560 and becomes governor,

01:45:19.720 totally possible.

01:45:20.840 If she prevails,

01:45:22.060 what are you going

01:45:22.440 to think about

01:45:22.940 Trump's claims

01:45:23.740 of election fraud?

01:45:26.420 You're going

01:45:26.980 to totally believe him.

01:45:29.580 Because it would be

01:45:30.680 hard to believe

01:45:31.320 that Maricopa

01:45:32.200 only acted

01:45:32.880 in this election

01:45:33.700 and only against

01:45:34.960 Carrie Lake.

01:45:36.200 It would be hard

01:45:36.640 to believe that.

01:45:37.200 Sunevich says

01:45:40.940 it's different,

01:45:41.680 the Trump situation

01:45:42.660 versus the lake.

01:45:43.480 Yes.

01:45:44.200 So I'm agreeing

01:45:44.860 that these are

01:45:45.500 different situations.

01:45:47.040 So her proving 0.99

01:45:47.780 her case 0.53

01:45:48.240 does not prove

01:45:48.900 Trump's.

01:45:49.380 What I'm saying

01:45:49.860 is in your brain

01:45:50.640 it will.

01:45:51.720 In your brain

01:45:52.320 it will totally

01:45:52.840 prove it.

01:45:54.120 It will in mine.

01:45:56.440 If Carrie Lake

01:45:57.720 prevails,

01:45:59.060 even though

01:45:59.580 it's different evidence

01:46:00.820 and different case

01:46:01.600 from Trump,

01:46:02.520 that would be enough

01:46:03.720 for me to say,

01:46:04.340 oh, Trump's

01:46:04.820 probably right.

01:46:05.300 probably right.

01:46:08.660 I would just go

01:46:10.080 completely to that side.

01:46:11.660 If Carrie Lake wins,

01:46:13.240 if she doesn't win

01:46:14.440 and doesn't prove

01:46:15.200 any impropriety,

01:46:17.680 then I'm going

01:46:18.260 to say,

01:46:18.620 well,

01:46:19.460 Trump's had a long

01:46:20.320 time to make his case

01:46:21.400 and he hasn't done it.

01:46:23.140 But if she wins,

01:46:24.260 even though it's

01:46:24.680 all different from Trump,

01:46:25.720 I agree with that,

01:46:27.200 my brain won't let

01:46:28.500 me release on that.

01:46:30.180 My brain will say,

01:46:31.120 all right.

01:46:32.600 If every time

01:46:34.020 somebody says,

01:46:35.040 I suspect something

01:46:36.040 and you look into it

01:46:37.320 and you find it,

01:46:38.640 I'm just going to

01:46:40.040 look at that pattern

01:46:40.760 and say,

01:46:41.200 well,

01:46:42.260 I doubt that's

01:46:43.000 a coincidence

01:46:43.480 that every time

01:46:44.380 there's a complaint

01:46:45.120 you find the actual

01:46:46.160 crime there.

01:46:50.980 Mass mail-in

01:46:51.860 leads to custody issues

01:46:53.360 which leads to fraud

01:46:54.540 in both cases

01:46:55.480 is the case.

01:46:57.320 I see what you're

01:46:58.200 saying there.

01:46:58.560 Yeah,

01:47:02.660 the chain of custody

01:47:03.520 stuff has been

01:47:04.600 proven as a problem

01:47:05.920 but ignored.

01:47:08.360 Yeah.

01:47:10.200 I think that's

01:47:10.980 what's going to happen

01:47:11.700 again.

01:47:15.520 All right.

01:47:16.520 This is a long

01:47:17.360 live stream

01:47:17.820 and I don't even

01:47:19.300 know if it's a good

01:47:19.840 one because

01:47:20.500 I'm talking about

01:47:21.980 some topics you've

01:47:22.780 heard about too

01:47:23.260 many times.

01:47:23.700 YouTube,

01:47:25.820 I'm going to say

01:47:26.180 goodbye.

01:47:26.680 I'm going to go talk

01:47:27.260 to the locals

01:47:28.120 people privately

01:47:28.900 and thanks for joining.

01:47:30.800 Okay.

01:47:37.420 Let's go.

01:47:42.520 Bye.

01:47:57.540 Bye.

01:47:57.860 Bye.

01:47:57.900 Bye.

01:47:59.060 Bye.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - December 22, 2022

Episode 1965 Scott Adams： Today Is All Fake News About The Fake News. And That Means Good Sipping

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript