Real Coffee with Scott Adams - December 29, 2022


Episode 1972 Scott Adams： Today I Will Trigger Viewers Into Cognitive Dissonance By Debunking Hoaxes


Episode Stats

Length

55 minutes

Words per Minute

140.4857

Word Count

7,769

Sentence Count

582

Misogynist Sentences

25

Hate Speech Sentences

29


Summary

Dilbert gets triggered by a tweet from Elon Musk, and Rep. Eric Swalwell says you can't have liars in Congress, and I'm done with liars. Also, Peter Sweden was banned from using his name on the internet, but he's back.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Coffee with Scott Adams, the highlight of your life
00:00:09.020 and civilization itself.
00:00:10.540 I don't think there's been a finer day, but wait till tomorrow, even better.
00:00:16.000 How would you like to experience some beverage with a little cognitive dissonance?
00:00:22.100 Some of you will be triggered by today's, well, a lot of you actually, maybe two-thirds
00:00:27.800 of you, will be experiencing some serious cognitive dissonance.
00:00:33.380 And I'm doing it intentionally, so before we start, you should know that that's going
00:00:39.320 to happen to two-thirds of you, but you don't know which ones.
00:00:42.240 Might be you, might be somebody else.
00:00:44.360 Now, if it happens to you, you're just going to get angry, and you're going to swear that
00:00:48.560 nothing like that happened.
00:00:50.360 Your reaction will be, I'm not in cognitive dissonance, darn it.
00:00:53.700 The words I say are making complete sense, but they won't.
00:00:59.060 They won't.
00:01:00.120 They'll be on the wrong topic, and everything else.
00:01:03.040 All right.
00:01:03.740 But before we get into that, how would you like to take your energy up to a level that
00:01:08.980 almost nobody has ever experienced before?
00:01:11.560 Of course you do.
00:01:13.000 And all you need is a cover mug or a glass, a tanker, jealous, or stye, and a canteen jug
00:01:16.840 or a flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:01:18.620 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that
00:01:25.940 makes everything better.
00:01:27.920 It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.
00:01:30.700 Go.
00:01:34.920 Craig says, give it to me.
00:01:37.140 Trigger me.
00:01:38.480 Well, I will.
00:01:40.400 I will.
00:01:41.220 So yesterday, a bot told me that Elon Musk started following me on Twitter, which gets
00:01:51.200 you a lot of attention, it turns out.
00:01:53.440 Because when the bots say that he follows somebody, people definitely notice that.
00:02:00.680 Now, he has been following the Dilbert Twitter account for several months, but now he's following
00:02:09.400 following me.
00:02:11.720 So, I guess I don't have any extra comment on that.
00:02:17.960 But how many times have I told you that what we've created here with this live stream is
00:02:25.000 something fairly substantial.
00:02:28.100 It's almost like an augmentation to the Constitution or the Republic.
00:02:32.180 And what I mean by that is it's an efficient way for opinions to bubble up and get to the
00:02:40.920 right people.
00:02:42.240 So, to the extent that your opinions, you know, are, let's say, unified on some topic, and
00:02:51.000 to the extent to which I tweet about it, you've got more visibility now.
00:02:55.100 So, your visibility all went up.
00:02:58.340 So, when I say that, you know, Elon Musk is following my Twitter account, that really
00:03:03.920 is about you as well, because, you know, it's all part of one process.
00:03:08.360 All right.
00:03:11.060 Remember I told you that I wanted Representative Santos, who's now, seems to be the biggest
00:03:17.240 liar Congress has ever known.
00:03:18.820 Um, I wanted him to keep his job specifically because, why?
00:03:24.580 Why did I say he should keep his job?
00:03:27.420 Do you remember?
00:03:28.640 Because it would be funny when the other members of Congress say he should quit because he's
00:03:34.900 a liar.
00:03:36.420 Now, you can't tell me that won't be funny.
00:03:39.880 And sure enough, Eric Swalwell has weighed in.
00:03:43.120 Eric Swalwell, to suggest that he should be investigated for being such a liar.
00:03:51.180 Now, is that not funny?
00:03:54.720 You do not disagree.
00:03:57.280 That is funny.
00:03:59.180 I don't have to add anything to that, do I?
00:04:01.720 There's like, there's no work for the professional humorist.
00:04:05.460 The professional humorist may take the day off, because the straight line or the set-up
00:04:12.420 does all the work.
00:04:14.060 All right, here's my joke of the day.
00:04:16.480 Eric Swalwell says that you can't have liars in Congress, and I'm done.
00:04:24.760 Set-up and punchline, set-up and punchline, all in one little neat package.
00:04:29.740 You can't beat that.
00:04:30.420 As a professional humorist, I appreciate the efficiency of this situation.
00:04:36.840 So keep that Santos guy in office.
00:04:39.140 We want to see, I want to see Adam Schiff rail against this liar.
00:04:44.940 I'd also like to see CNN bring on John Brennan to say we could never have a liar like this
00:04:50.480 in government.
00:04:56.640 Oh, Eric, just because he's a dick.
00:04:59.200 That's all.
00:05:00.420 So being a dick to me is reason for being blocked.
00:05:05.160 All right.
00:05:07.940 Peter Sweden, who I believe at one point was banned on Twitter, but he's back.
00:05:14.840 And he's one of the people who's notable for saying things about the pandemic,
00:05:20.700 which are not mainstream medical beliefs.
00:05:24.920 Now, I'm not saying that he is right or wrong, and we're going to enter the cognitive dissonance
00:05:33.300 territory, okay?
00:05:34.540 Now, here's the first way you can identify which one of you are getting triggered, because
00:05:40.100 a lot of you are going to get triggered.
00:05:41.840 The first way is you won't be able to stay on topic.
00:05:45.380 All right?
00:05:47.100 So look for the people who make very excited comments that might be true, might be true
00:05:53.280 facts, might not be, but they won't quite be on topic.
00:05:57.340 It'll be sort of in the same zip code, but it'll be like they're intentionally missing the point.
00:06:02.780 All right?
00:06:03.620 You ready?
00:06:04.620 Let's do this.
00:06:06.180 So Peter Sweden, notable pandemic.
00:06:11.480 Let's see.
00:06:11.920 What would I say?
00:06:13.300 Pandemic.
00:06:13.900 What's the name for somebody who says something that's not popular, but not a negative way?
00:06:24.460 Polemic.
00:06:25.000 Now, rogue.
00:06:26.600 Rogue.
00:06:27.140 Dissenter.
00:06:27.860 Dissenter.
00:06:29.660 Contrarian.
00:06:30.460 Contrarian.
00:06:30.960 That's it.
00:06:31.460 I got it.
00:06:31.940 Okay.
00:06:32.400 Thank you.
00:06:32.900 You got me.
00:06:33.720 Contrarian is the word I'm looking for, because I wanted a word that doesn't say anything about
00:06:38.320 whether he's right or wrong.
00:06:39.920 Can we agree on that?
00:06:41.480 Right.
00:06:41.700 So rule number one, we're not saying whether he or his points are good or bad.
00:06:48.060 So if any of you were to make a point in the next few minutes and say, but his point is
00:06:53.980 good, you're off topic.
00:06:56.380 All right?
00:06:56.740 You ready?
00:06:57.960 Let's see how many people will go off topic to show that they're in cognitive distance.
00:07:02.280 He tweeted a picture of the VAERS report and showed that there's a gigantic number of
00:07:09.840 reports in the VAERS database for pandemic-related stuff.
00:07:15.100 Okay?
00:07:15.500 It doesn't even matter what.
00:07:17.180 For our purposes, it doesn't matter what.
00:07:19.660 Just a huge number of extra VAERS.
00:07:24.180 VAERS meaning that there were negative reports of maybe a side effect from, I think, the vaccination.
00:07:30.580 Now, you all know that the VAERS reports are not substitutes for randomized controlled trials.
00:07:40.340 You agree, right?
00:07:41.520 It's simply people saying, hey, you might want to look into this.
00:07:45.260 And if lots of people are reporting the same thing, well, then you definitely want to look into it.
00:07:50.480 So can we all agree that if the VAERS report shows any anomaly, that the way you treat that
00:07:58.100 is not as a fact, but as something you definitely want to look into?
00:08:02.660 Everybody agree so far?
00:08:05.580 Okay.
00:08:05.780 So I tweeted that I was glad that Twitter had added a context note.
00:08:12.980 The context note basically debunked the interpretation of the VAERS thing and also mentioned that anybody
00:08:20.720 can put things on VAERS, et cetera.
00:08:24.160 Now, what do you think of that?
00:08:27.380 So my comment is that the context notes from Twitter are good.
00:08:32.980 Now, your comment, which will be off-topic, is you can't do randomized controlled top, right?
00:08:40.880 That's off-topic, cognitive dissonance.
00:08:43.280 Who else?
00:08:45.040 Who else can't deal with the fact that it's simply a context question?
00:08:50.140 Go ahead.
00:08:54.160 I blocked somebody's wife, and he says I'm jealous.
00:08:58.560 Anybody else?
00:09:01.400 Come on.
00:09:02.140 Come on.
00:09:02.980 Man, make an argument for why the VAERS report is right or wrong, which is totally not the
00:09:08.380 topic.
00:09:10.600 Oh, I got everybody quiet today.
00:09:13.460 Nobody wants to change the topic?
00:09:17.020 I warned you too much.
00:09:18.780 All right.
00:09:19.040 So is everybody here on the same wavelength that a gigantic anomaly is worth looking into, but
00:09:32.820 it's not a confirmation of anything, right?
00:09:35.440 Okay, good.
00:09:36.080 Yeah.
00:09:37.080 All right.
00:09:37.560 All right.
00:09:38.560 So that's good.
00:09:39.560 You did really well on that.
00:09:40.560 Do you think you'll do as well on the next one?
00:09:41.700 Do you think you'll do as well on the next one?
00:09:50.840 Let's see.
00:09:52.400 By the way, I guess my objective, you know, I've got a number of things I always like to accomplish, but among them, I would like my audience to be the most sophisticated analyzers of the news.
00:10:13.960 The people who know immediately what's wrong, like you see it immediately, and I'm going to give you another one in a minute that's going to be really tough for you.
00:10:22.940 This was the starter.
00:10:24.080 This was just the appetizer.
00:10:25.700 It's going to get tougher.
00:10:26.660 All right.
00:10:30.300 Here it is.
00:10:32.420 I ran a poll.
00:10:33.480 I said, how many of you believe some group of elites or leftists, and this could include Bill Gates, right?
00:10:39.560 So he could be on your list.
00:10:40.720 But how many believe some group of elites or leftists or someone important wants to reduce the population of Earth?
00:10:47.920 How many say that that is a true statement, that there are some elites, some people in power who want to reduce the population of Earth?
00:11:00.100 A lot of you say yes.
00:11:01.940 Some say no, but some say yes.
00:11:05.900 Now, how many of you, let me ask more specifically, how many of you have seen Bill Gates, either a video or seen his quote where he directly says,
00:11:17.440 yes, he says it directly in a video and also in a quote that he's looking to, wants to reduce the population of Earth?
00:11:24.820 How many of you have seen those?
00:11:29.660 Seen a lot of yeses, yeses.
00:11:31.880 Now, those of you who have seen those things, do you know they're hoaxes?
00:11:36.920 Here comes the cognitive dissonance.
00:11:38.620 The video of Bill Gates saying directly that he wants population reduction, it's actually a voiceover, it's just a hoax.
00:11:49.480 It's not even his voice.
00:11:51.400 But there's also a quote that says it directly, right?
00:11:55.060 I mean, there's a quote of real words that came out of his mouth that say it directly, right?
00:12:00.800 No, there isn't.
00:12:02.040 No, that doesn't exist.
00:12:03.100 It's widely quoted, but it doesn't exist.
00:12:07.880 There's a larger quote which they Rupard, whoever did it, somebody Rupard it.
00:12:13.660 They took a real quote and combined it, they changed its context.
00:12:18.520 So if you see it out of context, it looks exactly like he wants to reduce the population.
00:12:24.100 The actual context is he's talking about reducing something else.
00:12:28.420 It's actually not even about population.
00:12:30.600 So you can't actually find any evidence of Bill Gates wanting to reduce the population.
00:12:37.240 Now, how many of you believe me?
00:12:40.700 How many of you believe me that it's a hoax and a well-documented one?
00:12:45.900 We know exactly what the real video says, and we know what the hoax says.
00:12:51.340 We know exactly what the real quote says, and we know what the hoax says.
00:12:55.680 How many believe me that it's a hoax?
00:12:58.640 Just the Bill Gates part.
00:13:00.560 Just the Bill Gates part.
00:13:02.500 All right.
00:13:04.100 Now, if there's anybody left who still believes that Bill Gates is interested in population decline,
00:13:12.440 I don't mean to insult you, but what I'm going to do next might be a little tough for some of you.
00:13:19.700 Right?
00:13:20.040 This is not personal.
00:13:21.200 I'm not trying to insult you, genuinely.
00:13:25.320 I'm trying to make sure I have the most educated live stream.
00:13:30.500 All right.
00:13:30.640 This will be a little tough, but I think you can handle it.
00:13:33.520 On the Bill Gates population decline, you should not have had to do a fact check.
00:13:43.920 You should not have had to research that.
00:13:46.600 Here's why.
00:13:47.200 It doesn't pass the really test, you know, where you go, really?
00:13:54.520 Because up to around, this is just my guess, an IQ of about 120,
00:14:01.420 you could imagine that people maybe don't understand how population and economics work together.
00:14:08.660 In other words, if you believe that reducing the population of Earth could ever be good for Earth,
00:14:16.520 then you don't understand economics and population.
00:14:19.980 You might understand economics alone without the population.
00:14:23.300 You might understand population, but you don't understand that a growing population is absolutely required for economic stability.
00:14:33.500 It's required.
00:14:35.180 There's no way around it.
00:14:36.340 Everybody at Bill Gates' IQ level knows that.
00:14:42.000 Everybody.
00:14:44.580 All right.
00:14:44.900 Now, that's your challenge.
00:14:46.480 Find somebody that you believe is well above average and ask them,
00:14:51.460 what's better for the economy, a growing population or a shrinking population?
00:14:58.840 They'll all give you the same answer.
00:15:01.680 It will be 100% of the people will say, oh, it has to grow,
00:15:05.160 but you want to grow wisely, right?
00:15:09.720 It has to grow, but it should be a controlled, smart growth.
00:15:14.500 You don't want to wildly just overpopulate.
00:15:16.640 Now, some people say that there's a Rockefeller, you know, shady Rockefeller group that recommended back in 1975
00:15:30.580 that the policy of the United States should be to reduce, you know, out of control population growth.
00:15:37.380 True or false, true or false, that in 1975, it was believed that population growth was the problem.
00:15:45.120 True, true.
00:15:46.520 When I was that age, you know, I'm old enough to remember it, everybody was worried, all the smart people.
00:15:53.280 The people up here, they were all worried that the population was getting out of control.
00:15:59.860 But smart people watched what happened when countries got richer.
00:16:05.900 And they learned that, wait a minute, every single time a country gets richer, their birth rate goes down.
00:16:11.760 So it turned out it was like a self-correcting problem.
00:16:16.420 Now, I ran a little poll, and I asked how many of you believe some group of elites or whatever want to reduce the population of Earth?
00:16:26.460 72% of you said yes.
00:16:30.680 You're all wrong.
00:16:31.760 This one is clean cut.
00:16:36.200 There are a lot of things that we talk about where a difference in opinion or priorities, different of, like, projection and stuff.
00:16:44.460 You could have lots of reasons to disagree, but this isn't one of them.
00:16:49.100 This is one that there is no room for actual disagreement.
00:16:52.900 It's almost like physics.
00:16:54.520 It would be like disagreeing with gravity, right?
00:16:57.080 You need a growing population to have a good economy, and every person who pays attention and is at least a little bit smart, they all know it.
00:17:08.260 There are no elite people who want to reduce the population of Earth.
00:17:11.820 None.
00:17:12.740 But you might hear people say, you know, there might be, say, some African country that's getting ahead of itself, right?
00:17:19.520 So you could easily imagine some individual place has more population growth than locally they can grow food.
00:17:26.400 But that's not the big picture.
00:17:30.020 Now, how many of you are saying to yourself, huh, I used to think that there were smart people who wanted to reduce the population of Earth,
00:17:39.480 but now that you've explained it this way, I can see your point.
00:17:42.880 How many people have I convinced to change their mind?
00:17:48.720 If you haven't changed your mind about this, you're in cognitive dissonance.
00:17:53.220 This one is not the kind where there's any room for disagreement.
00:17:58.340 There really isn't.
00:18:00.060 You won't find any disagreement for people who understand the topic and are reasonably smart.
00:18:06.700 None.
00:18:07.740 Now, if you'd like to test this, I'd like you to find that person in your own life.
00:18:13.960 See if you can find a person who actually has the opinion you believe is widespread.
00:18:19.060 Nobody.
00:18:20.460 Nobody.
00:18:21.580 Now, you might say to yourself, but Scott, we're only talking about the elites.
00:18:25.620 The elites definitely want less population.
00:18:29.300 Maybe not smart people in general, but the elites.
00:18:33.220 No, they don't.
00:18:34.820 It would be terrible for the elites.
00:18:37.020 The elites don't want a shrinking population because those are their customers.
00:18:40.740 They want more people paying taxes, more people buying their stuff.
00:18:45.020 They only want more people.
00:18:48.080 But again, in a controlled way, not out of control growth.
00:18:55.600 All right.
00:18:58.440 How many people said, when I asked, you know, is there a group of elites, blah, blah, blah.
00:19:04.340 So, apparently, the people who said, you never know, I think are the same as the, you know, it's close to a quarter of the people said, you never know.
00:19:16.620 But you do know.
00:19:19.840 I don't want to make fun of a quarter of the people who answered this poll, but it's right on.
00:19:26.040 That 25% thing just keeps on working.
00:19:28.460 The wrong answer is you don't know.
00:19:33.280 Now, if I ran this poll again, you should all be able to answer that.
00:19:37.440 You definitely know.
00:19:38.900 No, there's nobody.
00:19:40.320 Nobody has that opinion in the elites.
00:19:42.700 It is a non-existent opinion.
00:19:47.240 How many of you are having, like, the biggest mindfuck of your life right now?
00:19:51.200 Because you were positive that was true.
00:19:53.060 How many of you were positive it was true until, like, just now?
00:20:02.280 Well, 72% of my poll said they were positive it was true just an hour ago.
00:20:11.100 Now, is anybody having a negative feeling about me?
00:20:14.740 Because that would be cognitive dissonance, too.
00:20:17.260 Is anybody thinking, oh, no, he's not trying to help us.
00:20:20.280 He's part of the elite.
00:20:22.840 Do you think I'm part of the elite who's trying to pull the wool over your eyes?
00:20:26.700 For what reason would that be?
00:20:29.580 What reason would I have to try to dupe you on this question?
00:20:34.900 None.
00:20:37.440 All right, well, I don't know if it's because I primed you so well,
00:20:43.080 but I think you're doing well.
00:20:48.580 You're handling this very well.
00:20:51.740 Those of you who are not changing your mind, you know,
00:20:54.960 you already knew that population growth was good.
00:20:57.420 Are you watching what's happening?
00:20:58.960 This is kind of remarkable.
00:21:00.560 It's kind of remarkable.
00:21:01.440 Because I would have expected far more word salad.
00:21:07.860 So I feel like maybe we are accomplishing something.
00:21:12.200 You know, if the only thing I could accomplish
00:21:14.000 is that my audience would learn how to change their mind
00:21:18.100 without cognitive dissonance,
00:21:20.080 that would be amazing.
00:21:23.220 Do you realize what an upgrade to your thinking process that would be?
00:21:26.920 If you could actually learn to just change your mind.
00:21:31.520 It's the rarest of talents.
00:21:35.560 But I feel like maybe this is a group that's better at it,
00:21:39.260 you know, through filtering.
00:21:42.500 Yeah.
00:21:48.720 This is pure denial, says Vince.
00:21:51.720 Well, Vince, it's pure denial.
00:21:55.160 So you believe that there are some,
00:21:58.920 even though there's no evidence of it whatsoever
00:22:01.580 and nobody smart would ever believe it,
00:22:03.800 you still believe this really big trick.
00:22:08.040 All right.
00:22:08.800 Well, let's move on.
00:22:11.840 There was a new study
00:22:13.440 that said that women can detect who's married versus unmarried
00:22:18.840 by sniffing their T-shirts and looking at their photos.
00:22:23.300 Do you see any problem with this?
00:22:26.580 Let's see how trained you are to identify bullshit studies.
00:22:31.360 So women can identify single men
00:22:33.480 by sniffing their T-shirts while looking at pictures.
00:22:38.920 Now,
00:22:39.920 don't you think that looking at the picture part
00:22:43.180 is the important part?
00:22:46.640 Do you think the sniffing was how they figured it out?
00:22:50.340 Or do you think it was just looking at the picture?
00:22:53.660 Because I'm not a woman,
00:22:56.000 but I can pick out married men by the picture.
00:22:58.800 Is there anybody who wouldn't be able to identify married men
00:23:01.580 by the picture?
00:23:03.740 Yeah, you can.
00:23:07.200 You totally can.
00:23:09.100 You absolutely can.
00:23:10.540 And one of the things that we know
00:23:13.040 is that single people have higher testosterone.
00:23:16.880 How many of you knew that?
00:23:18.500 That your testosterone goes down as soon as you get married,
00:23:21.680 and especially if kids are around.
00:23:23.320 If kids are around,
00:23:24.480 your testosterone just disappears practically.
00:23:27.820 Now,
00:23:28.480 and testosterone absolutely changes how you look.
00:23:32.360 In the long run,
00:23:34.200 a lot,
00:23:34.960 you know,
00:23:35.220 it can make you rounder and softer
00:23:36.780 versus more angular and cut.
00:23:39.960 But even in the short run,
00:23:43.040 I think.
00:23:43.640 Even in the short run.
00:23:45.120 Because testosterone is entirely the chemical
00:23:47.760 that makes men happy.
00:23:50.160 How many women knew this,
00:23:51.540 by the way?
00:23:52.920 That,
00:23:53.460 you know,
00:23:54.420 we all need our dopamine
00:23:56.040 and our,
00:23:57.020 I don't know,
00:23:58.160 serotonin,
00:23:59.000 whatever.
00:23:59.940 But,
00:24:01.080 but the difference between happy and unhappy
00:24:03.180 for a man
00:24:03.820 is their testosterone.
00:24:05.780 You can actually feel
00:24:07.160 a high testosterone day
00:24:08.600 if you're a male.
00:24:10.380 Would you,
00:24:10.940 can you guys confirm this?
00:24:13.000 Men,
00:24:13.760 you can feel a high testosterone day
00:24:15.780 and you can feel a low testosterone day.
00:24:18.800 And the high testosterone days,
00:24:20.380 you can do anything.
00:24:21.780 Like,
00:24:22.060 you have no fear.
00:24:23.760 The,
00:24:24.000 the biggest fear I have
00:24:25.540 when my testosterone is,
00:24:27.220 like,
00:24:27.460 clearly high,
00:24:28.440 the biggest fear I have
00:24:29.940 is that I don't have any fear.
00:24:31.120 And that's a problem.
00:24:34.040 Right?
00:24:35.080 And you know it when it's happening.
00:24:37.340 Like,
00:24:37.680 there are days I'm walking down the street
00:24:39.040 and I think,
00:24:40.080 God,
00:24:40.420 I hope nobody starts a fight with me today
00:24:42.240 because I think I would just end them.
00:24:44.960 And it has nothing to do with
00:24:46.500 being angry.
00:24:48.460 It wouldn't even be about temper.
00:24:50.740 It would just be
00:24:51.680 you get your business done.
00:24:53.680 It's just a feeling of,
00:24:55.240 well,
00:24:55.460 if I,
00:24:55.800 if I have to kill that attacker,
00:24:57.180 I guess I'll get on it.
00:24:58.900 Right?
00:24:59.260 It's just this feeling
00:25:00.360 of overwhelming capability.
00:25:03.380 Now,
00:25:03.880 you don't think you can pick that up
00:25:05.120 in somebody's eyes?
00:25:07.180 You don't think you can pick somebody
00:25:08.880 who,
00:25:09.240 who knows their testosterone
00:25:10.940 has been drained from them?
00:25:14.240 Versus somebody who is like,
00:25:16.600 you're ready to go?
00:25:17.820 You can totally tell
00:25:18.840 by looking at the face.
00:25:20.600 Now,
00:25:21.620 can they also
00:25:22.960 detect the scent?
00:25:25.440 I think so.
00:25:26.800 Probably.
00:25:27.780 Probably.
00:25:28.080 For example,
00:25:30.220 if you're smelling
00:25:32.200 a married person's T-shirt,
00:25:33.780 you might smell
00:25:34.380 the desperation.
00:25:40.380 Yeah,
00:25:40.940 dogs can smell fear.
00:25:42.980 If a dog can smell fear,
00:25:44.480 I'm pretty sure a woman
00:25:45.340 can smell a married man.
00:25:47.480 It can't be that different.
00:25:50.380 Basically the same problem.
00:25:51.660 All right.
00:25:56.460 Now,
00:25:57.640 I've got a prediction.
00:25:59.720 Been making this prediction
00:26:00.800 for a while,
00:26:01.600 but because of the pandemic,
00:26:03.180 I think society is ready for it.
00:26:05.780 There is,
00:26:06.320 there is in front of us
00:26:07.900 at some point
00:26:08.720 in our near future,
00:26:10.360 a real big reckoning,
00:26:12.620 public reckoning
00:26:13.560 with birth control pills.
00:26:15.840 Because as you know,
00:26:18.420 a birth control pill
00:26:19.440 changes the hormonal,
00:26:21.960 you know,
00:26:22.900 situation of a woman.
00:26:24.860 And,
00:26:25.620 as many,
00:26:27.520 but not all people
00:26:28.280 will tell you anecdotally,
00:26:30.660 it seems to change
00:26:31.740 their personalities.
00:26:33.620 And scientifically,
00:26:35.760 women are less attracted
00:26:37.340 to their mates
00:26:38.140 when they're on birth control.
00:26:39.660 which actually makes
00:26:41.320 perfect sense.
00:26:42.620 Because you would,
00:26:43.860 you would imagine
00:26:44.500 that evolution
00:26:45.320 would make you hornier
00:26:47.820 when you're able
00:26:48.720 to have babies
00:26:49.440 and less horny
00:26:50.880 when you're not.
00:26:52.220 And,
00:26:52.740 and I think,
00:26:53.780 you know,
00:26:54.080 the monthly cycle
00:26:55.580 demonstrates that.
00:26:57.020 Now,
00:26:57.360 that's not guaranteed,
00:26:58.460 I suppose,
00:26:59.620 but it makes sense.
00:27:01.240 You know,
00:27:01.520 you,
00:27:01.840 you would totally expect
00:27:03.120 women to be less attracted
00:27:05.040 in any situation
00:27:06.860 in which they're not fertile
00:27:08.020 and know it.
00:27:08.660 Now,
00:27:09.500 it doesn't,
00:27:09.840 I don't even necessarily
00:27:10.940 think it has to be
00:27:11.860 a bodily change.
00:27:14.520 I think if your brain
00:27:15.620 knows you can't have a baby,
00:27:17.740 it might actually,
00:27:19.300 you know,
00:27:19.780 also have a change
00:27:20.780 on your chemistry.
00:27:21.900 Just speculating.
00:27:23.980 But,
00:27:24.800 here's what I think.
00:27:26.740 I think because
00:27:28.060 the pandemic
00:27:30.080 has ruined our trust
00:27:31.640 in big pharma,
00:27:33.580 that people are going
00:27:34.280 to ask questions
00:27:34.940 that they just
00:27:35.480 wouldn't have asked before.
00:27:38.660 Mike,
00:27:40.720 don't make the birth control
00:27:42.060 is a depopulation.
00:27:45.020 You know,
00:27:45.260 that,
00:27:46.140 nice try.
00:27:48.460 But you still have to believe
00:27:49.700 somebody wants to do it.
00:27:51.320 It's not enough
00:27:52.060 to say that it exists.
00:27:54.020 It's not enough
00:27:54.640 to say that people
00:27:55.260 have options
00:27:55.900 for having babies.
00:27:57.400 That's not a question
00:27:58.460 of intent
00:27:59.040 of the elites.
00:28:00.520 It's just something
00:28:01.300 that's an option.
00:28:01.940 There might be intent,
00:28:04.480 but there's no evidence
00:28:05.260 of that.
00:28:09.360 You can want
00:28:10.120 to have sex
00:28:10.620 without wanting
00:28:11.060 to have babies,
00:28:11.620 yes.
00:28:12.220 But I believe
00:28:13.100 that women,
00:28:16.080 let's get rid
00:28:16.680 of the trolls.
00:28:17.940 Goodbye.
00:28:19.960 Any more?
00:28:23.400 All right.
00:28:23.960 So I think
00:28:27.520 that the trust
00:28:28.200 in big pharma
00:28:28.980 is low enough
00:28:29.860 that we can have
00:28:30.520 an honest conversation
00:28:31.640 about birth control,
00:28:32.820 which I believe
00:28:33.820 cripples women.
00:28:35.980 I believe
00:28:36.420 they become
00:28:37.120 personally
00:28:39.200 disadvantaged
00:28:40.560 and they're
00:28:42.000 less easy
00:28:42.920 to be around.
00:28:45.500 I don't know that.
00:28:47.400 I would say
00:28:48.060 that I will
00:28:49.900 make an analogy
00:28:50.860 because you love
00:28:51.580 analogies
00:28:52.240 to the VAERS report.
00:28:54.640 I'm not saying
00:28:55.380 I know for sure
00:28:56.320 that birth control
00:28:57.760 is ruining marriages
00:28:59.000 and relationships
00:29:00.000 and lives everywhere.
00:29:01.560 I'm saying
00:29:02.340 that it seems
00:29:04.260 so obvious,
00:29:05.860 anecdotally,
00:29:06.800 that if we're
00:29:07.680 not making this
00:29:08.340 a really high priority,
00:29:10.660 something's wrong.
00:29:12.260 And it's probably
00:29:12.840 because people
00:29:13.500 trusted big pharma
00:29:14.780 until recently.
00:29:16.180 So that's
00:29:16.860 my prediction.
00:29:17.620 The pandemic
00:29:18.460 lack of trust
00:29:19.640 in big pharma
00:29:20.300 will start
00:29:21.320 to bleed over
00:29:21.960 into birth control
00:29:22.920 and I expect
00:29:24.080 you'll see
00:29:24.520 a big movement
00:29:25.360 of people
00:29:26.600 who don't want
00:29:27.280 to be on birth control.
00:29:28.920 And it's not
00:29:29.600 because they don't
00:29:30.120 want to,
00:29:31.080 it's not because
00:29:31.640 of babies.
00:29:32.820 It'll be entirely
00:29:33.620 because how
00:29:34.960 it makes them feel.
00:29:38.120 Just,
00:29:38.780 that's my prediction.
00:29:40.520 All right,
00:29:41.340 here's some news
00:29:42.540 from Russia.
00:29:44.000 Apparently,
00:29:44.600 Russia is allowing
00:29:46.000 Russian soldiers
00:29:46.840 to freeze their sperm,
00:29:48.960 sperm, you know,
00:29:50.280 so in case
00:29:50.780 they die,
00:29:51.440 their wife
00:29:52.440 can have
00:29:53.420 their little sperm
00:29:54.100 baby.
00:29:55.420 But,
00:29:56.100 I don't know,
00:29:57.400 it feels like
00:29:58.180 I'm no military
00:30:00.980 expert,
00:30:01.640 but correct me
00:30:02.680 if I'm wrong,
00:30:03.520 were the Russian
00:30:04.140 soldiers
00:30:04.700 not already
00:30:06.260 freezing their
00:30:06.880 balls off?
00:30:09.740 Because,
00:30:10.420 is that a big
00:30:10.920 change?
00:30:12.000 Because I think
00:30:12.780 you could just
00:30:13.200 take a dead
00:30:14.020 Russian soldier,
00:30:15.560 say,
00:30:15.720 well,
00:30:15.940 he's dead
00:30:16.280 already,
00:30:16.860 just cut his
00:30:17.540 balls off
00:30:18.100 and take them
00:30:18.820 home to the
00:30:19.260 wife,
00:30:19.800 because the
00:30:20.440 balls are
00:30:20.760 frozen,
00:30:21.900 right?
00:30:22.120 I mean,
00:30:22.400 they'll be
00:30:22.660 frozen solid.
00:30:23.560 So you could
00:30:24.060 just cut off
00:30:25.120 their balls,
00:30:26.220 throw it in a
00:30:26.700 bag,
00:30:27.740 keep it frozen,
00:30:28.520 send it home,
00:30:29.760 boom,
00:30:30.500 cheaper than a
00:30:31.140 sperm bank.
00:30:32.620 So as long as
00:30:33.520 the Russian soldiers
00:30:34.480 are already
00:30:34.900 freezing their
00:30:35.500 balls off,
00:30:36.600 it feels a little
00:30:37.140 unnecessary.
00:30:39.620 I'm joking,
00:30:41.280 I'm joking
00:30:41.940 about their
00:30:43.520 balls.
00:30:45.720 But if I
00:30:46.560 were a
00:30:47.160 Ukrainian,
00:30:48.140 let me tell
00:30:48.820 you what I
00:30:49.220 would do
00:30:49.460 with this
00:30:49.780 information.
00:30:51.480 If I were
00:30:52.140 a Ukrainian,
00:30:52.880 I would make
00:30:53.300 sure every
00:30:54.220 single Russian
00:30:56.080 citizen knew
00:30:57.000 that Russia
00:30:59.020 didn't care
00:30:59.820 about the
00:31:00.240 soldiers,
00:31:01.160 they only
00:31:02.460 wanted to
00:31:02.860 keep their
00:31:03.200 balls.
00:31:04.820 We don't
00:31:05.400 care about
00:31:05.760 the entire
00:31:06.300 soldier,
00:31:06.980 obviously,
00:31:07.580 we're sending
00:31:07.980 him into
00:31:08.300 this meat
00:31:08.700 grinder,
00:31:09.280 but we do
00:31:09.780 care about
00:31:10.140 their balls.
00:31:12.400 Do you
00:31:12.620 know why
00:31:12.820 they care
00:31:13.140 about their
00:31:13.520 balls?
00:31:15.720 Do you
00:31:16.580 know why
00:31:16.740 the government
00:31:17.160 doesn't care
00:31:17.760 if they
00:31:18.020 die in
00:31:18.340 the meat
00:31:18.620 grinder,
00:31:19.280 but they
00:31:19.760 do care
00:31:20.120 about their
00:31:20.480 balls?
00:31:21.640 Because Russia
00:31:22.520 does not want
00:31:23.420 to have a
00:31:23.800 decreasing
00:31:24.280 population.
00:31:26.480 Do you
00:31:26.700 get that?
00:31:28.380 Russia knows
00:31:30.000 that a
00:31:31.220 decreasing
00:31:31.660 population is
00:31:32.600 the end of
00:31:33.040 Russia.
00:31:33.780 They have
00:31:34.480 to have
00:31:34.840 babies,
00:31:35.960 right?
00:31:36.540 So yes,
00:31:37.640 they're willing
00:31:38.480 to even
00:31:39.080 freeze your
00:31:40.040 sperm and
00:31:41.120 send you off
00:31:41.620 to die,
00:31:42.020 but at least
00:31:42.420 you can have
00:31:43.140 some babies
00:31:43.580 later if you
00:31:44.440 want.
00:31:45.720 I know
00:31:48.360 the balls
00:31:49.340 don't make
00:31:49.820 babies by
00:31:50.380 themselves.
00:31:52.120 You may
00:31:52.820 have detected
00:31:53.360 that that was
00:31:54.700 a humor
00:31:55.140 bit.
00:31:57.360 Yours knew.
00:31:58.940 All right.
00:31:59.900 So if I
00:32:00.700 were the
00:32:00.900 Ukrainians,
00:32:01.540 I would
00:32:01.800 use this
00:32:02.240 as PR
00:32:03.720 because what
00:32:05.020 is it that
00:32:05.720 Russian men
00:32:06.860 care about
00:32:07.440 more than
00:32:07.880 anything in
00:32:08.400 the world?
00:32:09.580 Is it
00:32:10.000 their elbows?
00:32:11.860 Is it
00:32:12.560 their ears?
00:32:13.880 No,
00:32:14.220 it's their
00:32:14.580 balls.
00:32:15.000 It's
00:32:15.800 their balls
00:32:16.320 and vodka.
00:32:17.760 The two
00:32:18.260 things that
00:32:18.720 Russian men
00:32:19.180 care the
00:32:19.660 most about
00:32:20.300 is vodka
00:32:21.580 and their
00:32:22.140 balls.
00:32:23.120 So if
00:32:24.260 the Russian
00:32:24.680 government is
00:32:25.460 telling them
00:32:25.920 that their
00:32:26.300 balls are in
00:32:26.900 jeopardy,
00:32:28.260 hey, I
00:32:28.940 started a
00:32:29.500 war, you're
00:32:30.620 probably going
00:32:31.100 to lose your
00:32:31.540 balls.
00:32:33.640 But it would
00:32:34.760 be good for
00:32:35.360 some historical
00:32:36.520 reason for
00:32:37.140 Russia or
00:32:37.640 something, but
00:32:38.980 you're going
00:32:39.300 to lose your
00:32:39.640 balls.
00:32:39.980 balls.
00:32:41.260 So remember,
00:32:44.040 persuasion is
00:32:44.820 about accessing
00:32:45.840 the irrational
00:32:46.560 part of the
00:32:47.060 brain.
00:32:47.780 It's not
00:32:48.200 about the
00:32:48.580 logic of
00:32:49.120 it.
00:32:51.380 Men are
00:32:52.000 actually more
00:32:52.680 afraid of
00:32:53.100 losing their
00:32:53.580 balls than
00:32:54.280 they are
00:32:54.520 afraid of
00:32:55.020 most things.
00:32:57.100 So you
00:32:57.500 just say,
00:32:58.000 you know,
00:32:58.460 you better
00:32:58.820 freeze your
00:32:59.340 sperm because
00:33:00.000 you go to
00:33:00.880 Ukraine and
00:33:01.480 you're not
00:33:01.780 going to
00:33:01.940 have balls
00:33:02.340 when you
00:33:02.840 come back.
00:33:03.300 get a
00:33:09.640 Russian ball
00:33:10.260 and make
00:33:10.540 a Rob
00:33:10.900 Reiner.
00:33:11.800 You're
00:33:12.360 stretching.
00:33:15.480 All right.
00:33:16.960 How in the
00:33:17.740 world did I
00:33:19.220 learn only
00:33:19.940 today that
00:33:21.620 Bill Cosby is
00:33:22.720 a free man?
00:33:24.740 How did I
00:33:25.220 miss that
00:33:25.580 story?
00:33:26.660 Did anybody
00:33:27.600 miss that
00:33:28.080 too?
00:33:29.140 Do you know
00:33:29.780 that he's
00:33:30.140 totally free?
00:33:32.760 Like,
00:33:33.300 not even
00:33:33.740 on parole.
00:33:35.300 He's like,
00:33:36.500 free.
00:33:38.780 I didn't
00:33:39.440 even know
00:33:39.820 it until
00:33:40.120 today.
00:33:41.020 Apparently
00:33:41.340 it happened
00:33:41.640 a little
00:33:41.920 while ago.
00:33:42.820 Yeah,
00:33:43.020 so I guess
00:33:43.520 his case
00:33:44.020 got overturned
00:33:45.820 by a higher
00:33:46.620 court and
00:33:47.760 the reason
00:33:48.240 for the
00:33:48.640 overturning,
00:33:49.240 it wasn't
00:33:49.640 terrible.
00:33:51.140 Like,
00:33:51.460 it's not
00:33:51.820 justice for
00:33:52.560 sure.
00:33:53.380 There's no
00:33:53.800 justice
00:33:54.180 happening here.
00:33:55.260 But the
00:33:55.880 legal reason
00:33:57.600 for overturning,
00:33:58.340 I actually
00:33:58.800 agreed with.
00:34:00.280 I mean,
00:34:00.540 it's a
00:34:00.800 horrible
00:34:01.180 outcome.
00:34:01.920 But the
00:34:03.200 legal reason
00:34:03.780 was a
00:34:04.160 technical
00:34:04.520 one,
00:34:05.160 that a
00:34:06.260 prosecutor
00:34:06.800 had promised
00:34:07.640 him he
00:34:08.000 wouldn't be
00:34:08.740 brought up
00:34:10.280 on charges
00:34:11.780 on this
00:34:12.260 specific case
00:34:13.000 he got
00:34:14.100 convicted of,
00:34:16.560 that he
00:34:17.120 wouldn't be
00:34:17.480 brought up
00:34:17.820 on charges
00:34:18.540 if he
00:34:19.160 testified in
00:34:20.140 a civil
00:34:20.640 case.
00:34:21.440 Because the
00:34:22.160 thinking was
00:34:22.780 it would be
00:34:23.180 too hard to
00:34:23.780 convict him
00:34:24.300 on a
00:34:25.200 criminal case,
00:34:26.260 but at least
00:34:26.940 the victim
00:34:27.560 could get
00:34:28.700 some money
00:34:29.240 if he'd
00:34:30.260 at least
00:34:30.560 be willing
00:34:31.000 to deal
00:34:31.440 with it
00:34:31.720 on a
00:34:32.000 civil
00:34:32.240 basis
00:34:32.640 so he
00:34:33.360 doesn't
00:34:33.600 go to
00:34:33.880 jail.
00:34:34.900 So that
00:34:35.440 was the
00:34:35.780 deal,
00:34:36.820 and Cosby
00:34:37.440 accepted the
00:34:38.140 deal.
00:34:39.300 Now,
00:34:39.860 it wasn't
00:34:40.300 written,
00:34:40.780 but I guess
00:34:41.140 it was
00:34:41.400 spoken at
00:34:41.980 one point
00:34:42.400 so they
00:34:42.720 could confirm
00:34:43.300 the deal
00:34:43.660 actually
00:34:44.000 existed.
00:34:44.900 There's a
00:34:45.320 tape of
00:34:45.980 it,
00:34:46.160 I guess.
00:34:47.180 And I
00:34:48.520 hate to
00:34:49.220 say it,
00:34:49.560 but I
00:34:49.800 agree with
00:34:50.320 the upper
00:34:50.820 court.
00:34:51.840 A deal's
00:34:52.280 a deal.
00:34:54.180 And it's
00:34:54.800 terrible.
00:34:56.160 It's
00:34:56.420 terrible.
00:34:56.880 I think it
00:34:57.420 was written,
00:34:57.940 you're right.
00:34:58.300 Yeah,
00:34:58.900 it probably
00:34:59.260 was written.
00:35:01.300 But the
00:35:01.860 argument was
00:35:02.440 that the
00:35:02.760 next
00:35:03.020 prosecutor
00:35:03.540 said,
00:35:04.060 I didn't
00:35:04.300 make the
00:35:05.420 offer,
00:35:05.780 right?
00:35:06.360 So the
00:35:06.760 next
00:35:07.020 prosecutor
00:35:07.600 said,
00:35:08.080 oh,
00:35:08.320 that doesn't
00:35:08.940 bind me.
00:35:10.140 But the
00:35:10.560 upper
00:35:10.740 court said,
00:35:11.320 it sure as hell
00:35:11.800 binds you,
00:35:12.320 it's the same
00:35:12.700 job.
00:35:13.660 Yeah,
00:35:13.900 it does
00:35:14.120 bind you.
00:35:14.740 And I
00:35:15.040 agree with
00:35:15.420 that.
00:35:15.820 I agree
00:35:16.200 with the
00:35:16.500 decision.
00:35:16.980 I hate
00:35:17.260 the fact
00:35:17.600 that he's
00:35:18.100 released,
00:35:18.820 of course,
00:35:19.460 but tough
00:35:21.300 choices.
00:35:22.240 Tough
00:35:22.520 choices.
00:35:23.660 And he's
00:35:24.100 actually
00:35:24.340 considering,
00:35:25.120 he's
00:35:25.880 considering going
00:35:27.360 back on the,
00:35:28.220 stand-up comedy
00:35:29.760 tour.
00:35:31.400 How in the
00:35:32.080 world is that
00:35:32.680 going to work
00:35:33.060 out for him?
00:35:34.680 How in the
00:35:35.400 world is that
00:35:36.120 going to work
00:35:36.500 out?
00:35:37.700 I don't know.
00:35:38.180 So Rasmussen had
00:35:45.120 a poll about
00:35:45.980 Trump's taxes
00:35:47.500 and asked,
00:35:49.860 how many
00:35:50.080 people would
00:35:50.460 like to see
00:35:51.020 Congress when
00:35:53.200 Republicans have
00:35:54.160 some control in
00:35:55.300 the House?
00:35:56.200 How would
00:35:56.640 they like to
00:35:57.100 see some
00:35:57.540 revenge?
00:36:00.040 And see the
00:36:01.040 other Congress
00:36:01.860 people's,
00:36:03.180 whoever voted to
00:36:04.280 see his tax
00:36:05.220 returns,
00:36:05.760 maybe we should
00:36:06.320 see their tax
00:36:07.320 returns.
00:36:08.140 54% say,
00:36:09.520 yeah,
00:36:09.720 let's see,
00:36:10.200 let's see his
00:36:11.060 accuser's tax
00:36:12.000 returns.
00:36:17.060 What do you
00:36:17.760 think?
00:36:19.740 Well,
00:36:20.400 I have two
00:36:21.160 feelings about
00:36:21.820 that.
00:36:23.280 First feeling
00:36:24.120 is,
00:36:25.460 why do we
00:36:28.100 think that
00:36:28.620 modifying the
00:36:29.520 republic to
00:36:31.220 make revenge,
00:36:33.080 like revenge a
00:36:34.120 main element of
00:36:35.000 the republic,
00:36:35.480 republic?
00:36:35.880 Why do we
00:36:36.340 think that's a
00:36:36.860 good idea?
00:36:38.420 That's like the
00:36:38.940 worst idea ever.
00:36:40.740 On the other
00:36:41.540 hand,
00:36:43.160 can you allow
00:36:45.140 your side to
00:36:46.740 get pushed
00:36:47.360 without pushing
00:36:48.520 back?
00:36:49.680 Well, I don't
00:36:50.420 like the word
00:36:50.920 revenge.
00:36:52.300 I do like
00:36:53.720 mutually assured
00:36:54.640 destruction.
00:36:56.240 Mutually assured
00:36:56.940 destruction totally
00:36:57.840 works for me.
00:36:58.720 I don't like
00:36:59.280 revenge.
00:36:59.820 You know,
00:37:01.120 as soon as you
00:37:01.680 allow yourself
00:37:02.400 that you can
00:37:02.860 have a revenge
00:37:03.600 based system,
00:37:04.480 then you're
00:37:05.120 off the rails.
00:37:06.660 Right?
00:37:07.080 As soon as
00:37:07.700 revenge is even
00:37:08.720 a word that you
00:37:09.620 allow into the
00:37:10.720 conversation,
00:37:11.760 I don't want
00:37:12.780 any part of
00:37:13.280 that system.
00:37:14.260 I don't want
00:37:14.740 to get revenge
00:37:15.400 on anybody.
00:37:16.240 I don't want
00:37:16.580 it to get
00:37:16.940 revenge on me.
00:37:18.240 No revenge.
00:37:19.560 But mutually
00:37:20.200 assured destruction
00:37:21.120 can be very
00:37:22.300 productive.
00:37:23.280 You know,
00:37:23.500 if you do this
00:37:24.160 to us,
00:37:24.700 we guarantee
00:37:25.300 it's going
00:37:25.680 to happen
00:37:25.980 back.
00:37:26.380 So on
00:37:27.660 that basis,
00:37:29.360 I approve
00:37:30.220 of looking
00:37:31.480 at the tax
00:37:32.180 returns of
00:37:32.680 anybody who
00:37:33.140 asked to
00:37:33.520 look at
00:37:33.760 this.
00:37:34.700 I do think
00:37:35.320 that that's
00:37:36.280 a guardrail
00:37:38.480 or, you
00:37:39.700 know,
00:37:40.100 or let's
00:37:40.860 say a risk
00:37:41.500 that should
00:37:42.440 be introduced
00:37:42.960 into the
00:37:43.580 system.
00:37:44.580 Because I
00:37:45.200 don't think
00:37:45.560 it's unreasonable
00:37:46.340 to ask to
00:37:47.160 see somebody's
00:37:47.740 tax returns
00:37:48.500 under certain
00:37:49.740 situations.
00:37:51.260 You know,
00:37:51.440 it has to
00:37:51.800 be the right
00:37:52.180 situation.
00:37:53.640 But there
00:37:54.920 should be a
00:37:55.380 cost to it.
00:37:56.000 It can't
00:37:56.600 be free.
00:37:57.860 So let's
00:37:58.540 put a price
00:37:59.000 on it and
00:37:59.540 then see if
00:37:59.940 they want
00:38:00.200 to pay it.
00:38:00.880 So I'm
00:38:01.480 all in
00:38:02.040 favor of
00:38:02.640 opening up
00:38:03.780 the tax
00:38:04.160 returns of
00:38:04.660 anybody who
00:38:05.040 wanted to
00:38:05.400 see his.
00:38:07.720 Especially
00:38:08.120 since there's
00:38:08.680 no specific
00:38:09.340 accusation,
00:38:10.140 right?
00:38:10.900 If there
00:38:11.440 were some
00:38:11.820 specific
00:38:12.400 accusation,
00:38:13.780 I would
00:38:14.300 say,
00:38:14.540 okay,
00:38:14.840 the other
00:38:15.140 people don't
00:38:15.600 have any
00:38:16.040 specific
00:38:16.520 accusations,
00:38:17.540 so we're
00:38:18.060 not going
00:38:18.380 to go
00:38:18.560 just fishing
00:38:19.180 around in
00:38:19.720 their taxes
00:38:20.200 just to see
00:38:21.220 if there's
00:38:21.560 a problem.
00:38:22.420 But that's
00:38:22.960 exactly what
00:38:23.560 they're doing
00:38:23.860 to Trump.
00:38:25.060 They're just
00:38:25.620 going to
00:38:25.860 fish around.
00:38:27.680 So that
00:38:28.140 has to be
00:38:28.540 equal.
00:38:29.900 That has to
00:38:30.500 work both
00:38:30.940 ways.
00:38:31.660 Because then
00:38:32.100 you have a
00:38:32.620 healthier risk
00:38:34.120 reward profile
00:38:35.060 in your
00:38:35.480 government.
00:38:36.720 And then
00:38:37.000 maybe the
00:38:37.380 republic can
00:38:37.920 actually work.
00:38:39.220 But revenge?
00:38:40.000 No.
00:38:40.260 You've got to
00:38:40.500 get rid of
00:38:40.860 revenge.
00:38:41.300 All right.
00:38:47.380 Did you
00:38:48.340 see a
00:38:49.040 fake news
00:38:49.860 that the
00:38:51.160 White House
00:38:51.960 COVID
00:38:52.920 advisor,
00:38:53.700 Dr.
00:38:54.540 Jha,
00:38:55.480 J-H-A,
00:38:57.000 according to
00:38:58.100 the fake
00:38:59.340 video that
00:39:00.020 you'll see
00:39:00.300 on video,
00:39:01.460 he admitted
00:39:02.300 on a recent
00:39:02.900 Zoom call
00:39:03.440 that,
00:39:04.140 quote,
00:39:04.820 no study
00:39:05.540 in the
00:39:05.820 world that
00:39:06.300 shows that
00:39:06.840 masks work.
00:39:08.820 Number one,
00:39:09.500 did he say
00:39:09.860 that?
00:39:10.140 Yes,
00:39:11.820 he did.
00:39:12.680 That's an
00:39:13.140 exact quote.
00:39:15.300 Does that
00:39:15.960 blow your
00:39:16.320 mind?
00:39:18.040 It's a
00:39:18.680 fake quote,
00:39:19.500 but it's
00:39:20.280 also real.
00:39:21.380 Do you
00:39:21.660 know how
00:39:21.920 they get
00:39:22.240 a real
00:39:22.800 quote that's
00:39:23.320 also fake?
00:39:24.320 They
00:39:24.560 Rupar it.
00:39:25.700 Yeah,
00:39:25.860 the Rupar
00:39:26.420 is you
00:39:26.980 take,
00:39:27.320 it's a
00:39:27.560 real quote,
00:39:28.800 but it's
00:39:29.240 incomplete
00:39:29.780 because they
00:39:30.420 take the
00:39:30.820 context down.
00:39:32.060 Do you
00:39:32.300 know what
00:39:32.480 the end
00:39:32.880 of the
00:39:33.140 sentence
00:39:33.400 was?
00:39:34.760 The end
00:39:35.640 of his
00:39:35.960 sentence
00:39:36.320 was very
00:39:37.740 well.
00:39:38.380 In other
00:39:38.680 words,
00:39:39.520 there's a
00:39:40.120 study in
00:39:40.880 the world
00:39:41.180 that shows
00:39:41.680 that masks
00:39:42.380 work very
00:39:43.500 well.
00:39:45.480 The whole
00:39:46.180 context is
00:39:46.900 missing.
00:39:48.520 I'm guessing
00:39:49.420 the context
00:39:50.440 was,
00:39:51.280 do you
00:39:52.740 need
00:39:52.960 vaccinations?
00:39:55.340 If you're
00:39:56.000 wearing masks,
00:39:56.800 why do you
00:39:57.240 need vaccinations?
00:39:59.060 I don't know
00:39:59.760 if that's the
00:40:00.200 context,
00:40:00.660 but it would
00:40:00.920 make sense.
00:40:01.920 Well,
00:40:02.220 if you were
00:40:02.580 answering that
00:40:03.000 question,
00:40:03.900 he would say,
00:40:04.660 there's no
00:40:05.260 study that
00:40:05.780 say masks
00:40:06.620 work that
00:40:07.420 well,
00:40:07.720 so well
00:40:08.880 that you
00:40:09.200 don't need
00:40:09.580 vaccinations.
00:40:10.940 I'm not
00:40:11.340 promoting
00:40:11.640 vaccinations.
00:40:12.780 This is
00:40:13.440 an imaginary
00:40:14.380 conversation
00:40:15.040 by somebody
00:40:15.620 else,
00:40:15.920 right?
00:40:17.100 So that's
00:40:17.780 probably the
00:40:18.300 context.
00:40:19.360 But somebody
00:40:19.980 took the
00:40:20.900 very well
00:40:21.700 part,
00:40:22.180 which would
00:40:22.600 say that
00:40:23.000 masks do
00:40:23.680 work,
00:40:24.800 just not
00:40:25.300 very well,
00:40:26.560 and reversed
00:40:28.460 it to say
00:40:29.120 that there's
00:40:29.560 no study
00:40:30.020 that says
00:40:30.400 they work
00:40:30.780 at all.
00:40:31.860 Now,
00:40:32.160 I'm not
00:40:32.600 supporting
00:40:33.680 masks.
00:40:34.740 I don't
00:40:35.000 want any
00:40:35.360 mandates.
00:40:35.860 I don't
00:40:36.900 know what
00:40:37.160 the studies
00:40:37.640 say,
00:40:38.200 because I
00:40:38.440 don't believe
00:40:38.820 any study
00:40:39.340 about masks.
00:40:41.020 But this
00:40:41.940 is fake
00:40:42.320 news.
00:40:43.160 Would you
00:40:43.460 all agree?
00:40:47.380 It's
00:40:47.860 fake news.
00:40:49.380 Yeah.
00:40:49.860 So just
00:40:50.200 know that.
00:40:50.800 Oh,
00:40:51.020 speaking of
00:40:51.520 Dr.
00:40:51.880 Drew,
00:40:53.160 I caught
00:40:54.780 a Spaces,
00:40:56.280 the Spaces
00:40:57.560 portion of
00:40:58.180 his show,
00:40:59.880 and you
00:41:00.740 have to hear,
00:41:02.120 it's one
00:41:02.340 of the
00:41:02.540 best podcasts
00:41:05.320 about anything
00:41:06.320 that I've
00:41:07.280 seen in a
00:41:07.600 long time.
00:41:08.220 And he's
00:41:08.560 having a
00:41:08.900 conversation
00:41:09.300 with another
00:41:09.940 doctor,
00:41:11.640 and the
00:41:11.900 two of
00:41:12.140 them are
00:41:12.400 talking about
00:41:12.980 the
00:41:14.140 difficulties
00:41:14.720 of knowing
00:41:16.820 what's true
00:41:17.740 and what
00:41:18.040 isn't in
00:41:18.960 the medical
00:41:19.360 field,
00:41:20.200 and how
00:41:20.520 doctors don't
00:41:21.300 really have
00:41:22.000 all the
00:41:22.280 training they
00:41:22.820 need to
00:41:23.860 analyze the
00:41:24.460 studies and
00:41:25.020 the data.
00:41:25.640 It's really
00:41:26.360 good.
00:41:27.360 So I
00:41:27.880 retweeted it.
00:41:29.080 You can
00:41:29.380 find that in
00:41:30.200 Dr. Drew's
00:41:30.980 feed, or
00:41:31.880 you'll see the
00:41:32.760 retweet in
00:41:33.240 mine on
00:41:33.960 Twitter.
00:41:34.180 Highly
00:41:35.720 recommend it.
00:41:36.380 It's a
00:41:36.640 good, it's
00:41:37.960 like 15
00:41:38.520 minutes that
00:41:39.060 will really
00:41:39.500 put some
00:41:40.380 context on
00:41:41.260 it for
00:41:41.520 you.
00:41:44.240 How many
00:41:45.080 of you
00:41:45.600 saw that
00:41:46.540 Andrew
00:41:49.480 Taint and
00:41:50.400 Greta
00:41:51.720 Thunberg are
00:41:52.520 trending
00:41:53.080 together today?
00:41:55.220 Is
00:41:55.700 everybody up
00:41:56.360 to date on
00:41:56.780 that news?
00:41:58.440 Now,
00:42:00.420 I'm
00:42:01.820 hesitant to
00:42:03.480 even report
00:42:04.120 the story
00:42:04.680 because Greta
00:42:07.500 did something
00:42:08.120 that to
00:42:09.660 me is
00:42:10.180 unconscionable.
00:42:12.080 So I
00:42:13.780 have my
00:42:14.180 complaints about
00:42:15.180 Greta and
00:42:15.660 climate change,
00:42:16.660 but what
00:42:17.440 Greta tweeted
00:42:18.120 is completely
00:42:19.720 unacceptable.
00:42:21.540 She did
00:42:22.120 body shaming.
00:42:24.320 Now,
00:42:25.120 body shaming,
00:42:26.160 I think you
00:42:26.960 know,
00:42:27.740 I don't do.
00:42:28.980 I'm totally
00:42:31.320 against it.
00:42:32.460 There's just
00:42:32.900 nothing good
00:42:33.720 about that,
00:42:34.260 right?
00:42:35.140 Now,
00:42:35.660 so I don't
00:42:36.040 do it for
00:42:36.520 people who
00:42:36.980 are overweight
00:42:37.520 because I
00:42:38.020 understand
00:42:38.420 everybody's
00:42:39.860 different.
00:42:41.960 I don't do
00:42:42.740 it for if
00:42:43.320 you're missing
00:42:43.700 a leg.
00:42:45.040 I'm not
00:42:45.380 going to
00:42:45.560 body shame
00:42:46.040 you for
00:42:46.360 missing a
00:42:46.860 leg.
00:42:48.360 But let me
00:42:49.160 tell you the
00:42:49.560 story.
00:42:50.640 So the
00:42:51.000 story is,
00:42:51.620 you know,
00:42:51.920 Andrew Tate
00:42:55.060 was trying
00:42:56.080 to mock
00:42:56.620 her and
00:42:57.180 trying to
00:42:57.620 win some
00:42:58.080 points by
00:42:59.020 saying he's
00:42:59.460 had lots of
00:42:59.980 cars and
00:43:00.660 he pollutes
00:43:01.320 or creates
00:43:02.060 a lot of
00:43:02.340 CO2 and
00:43:03.120 so on.
00:43:04.120 And then
00:43:04.500 she responded
00:43:05.220 with a
00:43:05.520 hashtag,
00:43:06.720 which the
00:43:07.640 hashtag
00:43:08.180 humorously
00:43:09.100 accuses him
00:43:13.180 of having
00:43:13.940 a male body
00:43:14.840 part that's
00:43:15.620 undersized.
00:43:17.260 Now,
00:43:18.340 why is
00:43:18.980 that okay?
00:43:20.880 Well,
00:43:21.100 why is
00:43:22.760 the left
00:43:23.120 okay with
00:43:23.560 body shaming
00:43:24.160 suddenly?
00:43:25.180 And everybody
00:43:25.640 is,
00:43:25.920 go,
00:43:26.280 Greta.
00:43:27.260 That was
00:43:27.840 some great
00:43:28.240 body shaming.
00:43:30.340 Is it
00:43:30.740 because it's
00:43:31.200 a man you
00:43:31.680 don't like?
00:43:32.920 So therefore
00:43:33.560 it's okay?
00:43:34.700 So if
00:43:35.060 there was,
00:43:36.820 let's say,
00:43:37.240 an overweight
00:43:37.720 woman you
00:43:38.420 didn't like,
00:43:39.600 then you
00:43:39.960 could do
00:43:40.280 some body
00:43:40.720 shaming?
00:43:41.420 Is that
00:43:41.680 what you're
00:43:41.920 saying?
00:43:43.120 What kind
00:43:43.760 of standard
00:43:44.120 is that?
00:43:45.460 No,
00:43:46.020 I hate to
00:43:46.720 do it,
00:43:47.360 but I
00:43:49.000 think Greta
00:43:49.500 is,
00:43:49.940 in
00:43:52.160 disgusting
00:43:53.080 territory.
00:43:54.380 Disgusting.
00:43:56.900 Disgusting.
00:43:58.180 On the
00:43:58.740 other hand,
00:43:59.120 he does
00:43:59.440 have a lot
00:43:59.900 of sports
00:44:00.300 cars.
00:44:03.280 Trying to
00:44:03.860 be even
00:44:04.240 handed here.
00:44:05.460 On one
00:44:05.860 hand,
00:44:06.220 no body
00:44:06.700 shaming.
00:44:07.300 On the
00:44:07.600 other hand,
00:44:08.000 he has a
00:44:08.500 lot of
00:44:08.840 sports cars.
00:44:10.920 I don't
00:44:11.500 know why
00:44:11.820 anybody needs
00:44:12.420 so many.
00:44:14.160 I don't
00:44:14.640 know why.
00:44:15.780 It's just
00:44:16.220 a fact that
00:44:17.200 you can
00:44:17.480 process.
00:44:17.860 Here,
00:44:20.380 Trump has
00:44:20.860 been proven
00:44:21.300 right again
00:44:21.920 because
00:44:23.740 Britain is
00:44:24.900 restricting
00:44:25.480 travel from
00:44:26.700 China.
00:44:28.020 Do you
00:44:28.520 remember when
00:44:29.080 Trump
00:44:29.900 restricted
00:44:30.680 travel from
00:44:31.500 China when
00:44:32.120 the pandemic
00:44:32.780 was new?
00:44:34.260 And what
00:44:36.460 did Biden
00:44:36.860 say?
00:44:37.780 He said
00:44:38.180 that Trump
00:44:38.560 was being
00:44:38.940 racist against
00:44:39.900 Asians by
00:44:41.900 temporarily
00:44:42.440 saying we
00:44:43.720 better halt
00:44:44.260 our immigration
00:44:45.040 to make
00:44:45.760 sure we
00:44:46.860 can protect
00:44:47.340 ourselves.
00:44:48.400 And now
00:44:48.840 Biden is
00:44:50.780 requiring a
00:44:52.100 negative
00:44:52.460 COVID test
00:44:53.380 if you're
00:44:53.760 coming from
00:44:54.280 China.
00:44:56.420 Same damn
00:44:57.240 thing.
00:44:58.760 So just
00:45:00.620 add this to
00:45:01.180 your list of
00:45:01.720 things Trump
00:45:02.520 was right
00:45:02.960 about that
00:45:04.040 Biden would
00:45:04.560 have to
00:45:04.920 copy
00:45:05.300 reluctantly.
00:45:07.240 So Biden
00:45:07.700 is now
00:45:08.140 copying
00:45:08.640 Trump
00:45:09.080 reluctantly
00:45:10.020 after having
00:45:11.360 criticized him
00:45:12.100 for the
00:45:12.460 very same
00:45:12.860 thing.
00:45:13.120 speaking of
00:45:16.380 Trump.
00:45:17.380 So Trump
00:45:17.820 was subpoenaed
00:45:18.580 by that
00:45:18.960 January 6th
00:45:19.820 hoax
00:45:20.080 committee and
00:45:21.540 they withdrew
00:45:22.740 because I
00:45:23.820 guess
00:45:24.060 Harmeet
00:45:24.960 Dhillon
00:45:26.100 went after
00:45:28.480 them
00:45:28.760 effectively.
00:45:29.500 I think
00:45:29.760 this is
00:45:30.120 the reason.
00:45:31.060 So I
00:45:31.320 think Harmeet
00:45:31.880 went after
00:45:32.400 them on
00:45:32.840 separation of
00:45:33.560 powers.
00:45:34.660 You know
00:45:34.840 that the
00:45:35.120 president
00:45:35.460 should be
00:45:35.880 separate and
00:45:36.680 not beholden
00:45:37.520 to the
00:45:37.800 Congress.
00:45:38.220 So if
00:45:39.440 Congress can
00:45:40.180 subpoena the
00:45:40.760 president it's
00:45:41.940 a pretty good
00:45:42.300 argument and
00:45:43.180 apparently it
00:45:43.800 succeeded.
00:45:45.020 If Congress
00:45:45.880 can basically
00:45:46.640 bitch slap
00:45:47.260 the president
00:45:47.920 outside of
00:45:49.540 the realm
00:45:49.960 of impeachment
00:45:51.440 which is
00:45:52.900 specified
00:45:53.540 then it's
00:45:54.940 not a true
00:45:55.360 separation of
00:45:55.960 powers.
00:45:56.840 I have to
00:45:57.260 admit I
00:45:58.680 would not
00:45:59.000 have thought
00:45:59.340 of that one.
00:46:00.180 I guess
00:46:00.440 that's why
00:46:00.780 I'm not a
00:46:01.140 lawyer.
00:46:02.040 But that
00:46:02.820 was a good
00:46:03.120 play.
00:46:04.560 So well
00:46:05.100 played.
00:46:05.760 Harmeet.
00:46:06.740 Nicely done.
00:46:08.220 Trump has
00:46:09.700 said some
00:46:11.640 things about
00:46:12.100 abortion and
00:46:12.700 Social Security
00:46:13.380 in a
00:46:13.980 Breitbart
00:46:14.420 interview.
00:46:16.660 So the
00:46:18.280 first thing
00:46:18.700 that Trump
00:46:19.040 says is
00:46:19.540 that there
00:46:19.860 are two
00:46:20.180 traps that
00:46:20.860 Republicans
00:46:21.320 fall into.
00:46:22.840 One is
00:46:23.440 being open
00:46:24.140 to adjusting
00:46:26.040 Social Security
00:46:27.300 which Trump
00:46:28.620 quite accurately
00:46:29.640 quite correctly
00:46:31.280 says no
00:46:32.260 that's a
00:46:32.680 contract.
00:46:34.080 That's a
00:46:34.520 contract with
00:46:35.220 the people
00:46:35.540 who paid
00:46:35.920 Social Security.
00:46:36.680 You can't
00:46:37.680 violate the
00:46:38.180 contract.
00:46:39.040 Now how
00:46:39.400 much do
00:46:39.820 you love
00:46:40.380 the fact
00:46:41.660 that Trump
00:46:42.100 says that?
00:46:43.760 Right now
00:46:44.120 he's being
00:46:44.480 political when
00:46:45.180 he says it
00:46:45.700 but his
00:46:46.420 reason is
00:46:47.040 you don't
00:46:47.520 go back
00:46:48.200 on a
00:46:48.480 deal.
00:46:49.260 I fucking
00:46:49.900 love that.
00:46:51.160 I just
00:46:51.460 love that.
00:46:52.460 Like I
00:46:52.760 want my
00:46:53.180 president
00:46:53.560 to say
00:46:54.900 you know
00:46:55.260 what?
00:46:56.020 You don't
00:46:56.380 go back
00:46:56.740 on a
00:46:56.980 deal with
00:46:57.300 the
00:46:57.420 American
00:46:57.680 people.
00:46:59.180 Even
00:46:59.620 if you
00:46:59.860 have a
00:47:00.080 reason.
00:47:01.180 Even
00:47:01.380 if you
00:47:01.580 have a
00:47:01.780 good
00:47:01.940 reason.
00:47:03.020 Our
00:47:03.280 budget's
00:47:03.760 in
00:47:04.320 trouble.
00:47:04.820 That's a
00:47:05.100 good
00:47:05.220 reason.
00:47:05.500 But just
00:47:06.900 saying we're
00:47:07.340 not going
00:47:07.620 to go
00:47:07.980 back on
00:47:08.340 a deal
00:47:08.660 with the
00:47:08.980 American
00:47:09.240 people,
00:47:09.760 that's
00:47:10.180 strong.
00:47:11.600 That's
00:47:11.940 exactly the
00:47:12.980 kind of
00:47:13.260 strength I'd
00:47:14.260 like to
00:47:14.500 hear.
00:47:15.040 So that's
00:47:15.520 a good
00:47:15.720 move.
00:47:17.040 His other
00:47:17.560 advice to the
00:47:20.060 Republicans is
00:47:21.440 about how to
00:47:21.920 talk about
00:47:22.320 abortion.
00:47:22.720 Trump says
00:47:23.940 you have to
00:47:25.680 have the
00:47:25.940 three
00:47:26.180 exceptions
00:47:26.740 in order
00:47:28.680 to get
00:47:29.000 elected.
00:47:29.940 Now it's
00:47:30.440 not necessarily
00:47:31.120 his personal
00:47:31.940 opinion,
00:47:32.760 but he's
00:47:33.060 saying
00:47:33.220 politically
00:47:33.720 you're
00:47:34.700 going to
00:47:34.880 have to
00:47:35.260 say that
00:47:36.460 abortion
00:47:36.860 would be
00:47:37.300 okay under
00:47:38.000 three
00:47:38.340 exceptions,
00:47:40.360 as long
00:47:41.240 as it's
00:47:41.520 within the
00:47:42.080 time period
00:47:42.780 I guess,
00:47:44.940 of what
00:47:45.500 is it,
00:47:45.780 rape,
00:47:46.180 incest,
00:47:47.560 what's the
00:47:48.740 third one?
00:47:49.160 rape,
00:47:51.900 incest,
00:47:52.600 and oh
00:47:53.160 yeah,
00:47:53.460 the health
00:47:54.180 of the
00:47:54.460 mother,
00:47:54.760 the life
00:47:55.080 of the
00:47:55.300 mother,
00:47:55.880 if it's
00:47:56.620 to save
00:47:56.980 the mother's
00:47:57.400 life.
00:47:58.240 Now I'm
00:47:59.440 not giving
00:47:59.860 you an
00:48:00.200 opinion
00:48:00.500 one way
00:48:01.360 or the
00:48:01.700 other,
00:48:02.380 because my
00:48:03.560 opinion on
00:48:04.360 abortion is
00:48:05.760 that the
00:48:07.380 consensus of
00:48:08.380 women should
00:48:09.140 be leading
00:48:10.240 that,
00:48:11.300 not the
00:48:11.760 opinion of
00:48:12.240 a man.
00:48:13.520 So don't
00:48:14.260 imagine you're
00:48:15.080 hearing my
00:48:15.500 opinion about
00:48:16.040 abortion.
00:48:16.680 I'm completely
00:48:17.500 recusing
00:48:18.040 myself,
00:48:18.680 and I'm
00:48:19.020 going with
00:48:20.380 the female
00:48:21.200 preference.
00:48:22.660 I think that's
00:48:23.140 just a better
00:48:23.600 way to
00:48:23.980 organize society.
00:48:26.300 And now
00:48:26.720 the question
00:48:27.780 you ask is,
00:48:28.500 is there
00:48:28.680 anything like
00:48:29.140 that the
00:48:29.660 other way?
00:48:30.680 Is there
00:48:31.000 anything where
00:48:31.500 you say,
00:48:31.880 hey,
00:48:32.040 women should
00:48:32.540 just stay
00:48:32.940 out of this
00:48:33.300 question?
00:48:34.200 Yes.
00:48:35.960 Circumcision.
00:48:37.140 Stay out of
00:48:37.800 it.
00:48:38.980 Let the men
00:48:39.760 figure it out.
00:48:41.040 And we'll
00:48:41.700 let you do
00:48:42.200 your thing.
00:48:43.620 Let us do
00:48:44.360 our thing.
00:48:45.180 Now it's
00:48:45.620 not that you
00:48:46.040 can't have an
00:48:46.500 opinion, but I
00:48:47.080 don't want to
00:48:47.420 listen to it.
00:48:47.940 I just
00:48:48.780 wouldn't want
00:48:49.160 to listen to
00:48:49.580 it.
00:48:52.080 All right.
00:48:52.760 What do you
00:48:53.260 think?
00:48:53.620 Do you think
00:48:54.120 that Trump's
00:48:54.780 political instincts,
00:48:56.480 let's see if we
00:48:57.100 can keep it to
00:48:57.660 the political,
00:48:58.800 forget about
00:48:59.580 whether you
00:49:00.000 like the
00:49:00.400 three exceptions.
00:49:01.340 Is he right
00:49:03.460 politically?
00:49:04.680 Because I think
00:49:05.480 he is.
00:49:06.720 Right?
00:49:06.980 Yeah.
00:49:07.880 Now, when I
00:49:10.040 listen, one of the
00:49:11.640 things you forget
00:49:12.380 about Trump,
00:49:13.760 because he
00:49:14.400 creates so much
00:49:15.300 activity and
00:49:16.980 makes your
00:49:17.320 brain catch
00:49:17.840 on fire and
00:49:18.400 stuff, one
00:49:19.320 of the things
00:49:19.660 you forget
00:49:20.120 about him is
00:49:20.840 how savvy
00:49:21.420 he is.
00:49:22.800 He's just
00:49:23.300 smarter about
00:49:25.080 politics.
00:49:26.960 Now, he has
00:49:28.020 his excesses and
00:49:29.000 he says some
00:49:29.540 things that get
00:49:30.060 him in trouble
00:49:30.520 and everybody
00:49:31.820 can have their
00:49:32.400 own opinions
00:49:33.900 about that.
00:49:35.220 But in just a
00:49:36.820 pure political
00:49:37.760 calculation,
00:49:39.080 should you say
00:49:39.700 this or should
00:49:40.340 you say that,
00:49:41.000 he is really
00:49:41.500 good at this.
00:49:42.200 And you
00:49:43.040 forget how
00:49:43.520 good he is
00:49:44.100 until you're
00:49:45.080 reminded by
00:49:45.720 this.
00:49:46.200 This is
00:49:46.600 exactly right,
00:49:47.820 politically.
00:49:48.820 Again, not in
00:49:49.920 terms of policy,
00:49:51.220 necessarily.
00:49:59.600 As a woman,
00:50:00.500 you think men
00:50:01.060 should be part
00:50:01.520 of the abortion
00:50:01.960 conversation?
00:50:03.500 Fine.
00:50:04.720 And if those
00:50:05.680 men that you
00:50:06.820 talk about
00:50:07.440 influence you,
00:50:08.280 that's fine,
00:50:08.800 too.
00:50:10.140 I only make
00:50:11.060 the decision
00:50:12.200 for myself.
00:50:14.000 Was that
00:50:14.380 clear?
00:50:15.140 I'm not
00:50:15.700 recommending that
00:50:16.380 other men
00:50:16.840 stay out of
00:50:17.340 it.
00:50:18.520 I guess I
00:50:19.120 should have
00:50:19.360 clarified that.
00:50:20.300 I'm saying I
00:50:20.980 should stay out
00:50:21.560 because I'm a
00:50:22.120 man, a very
00:50:22.740 personal feeling.
00:50:24.540 I don't imply
00:50:26.460 that you should
00:50:27.080 feel the same
00:50:27.600 way.
00:50:28.400 That's just my
00:50:28.940 personal feeling.
00:50:32.600 All right.
00:50:34.400 Half of all
00:50:35.120 fetuses are
00:50:35.720 male?
00:50:37.000 Yeah.
00:50:37.960 You know, I
00:50:38.700 mean, I
00:50:39.060 understand the
00:50:39.600 argument.
00:50:39.900 I'm just
00:50:41.240 saying the
00:50:41.620 society is
00:50:42.480 better if
00:50:43.100 you let
00:50:44.160 the people
00:50:44.520 with the
00:50:44.860 most skin
00:50:45.340 in the
00:50:45.620 game have
00:50:47.220 the larger
00:50:47.900 part of the
00:50:49.160 decision,
00:50:50.120 just in
00:50:50.580 general.
00:50:54.440 All right.
00:50:57.260 Scott, you
00:50:58.060 did recommend
00:50:58.640 men stay
00:50:59.160 in for
00:50:59.380 political
00:51:00.240 reasons.
00:51:01.280 Yes.
00:51:02.660 Yes.
00:51:03.860 I still
00:51:04.480 recommend that.
00:51:06.220 Was that,
00:51:06.860 is that
00:51:07.480 conflicting with
00:51:08.380 anything I
00:51:08.800 said?
00:51:09.900 Men can do
00:51:11.780 anything they
00:51:12.220 want.
00:51:12.540 I put no
00:51:13.540 restrictions on
00:51:14.260 men.
00:51:15.120 But if the
00:51:16.660 men talk about
00:51:17.340 it, they're
00:51:17.720 hurting themselves
00:51:18.480 politically.
00:51:20.120 But they can
00:51:20.840 do it.
00:51:21.940 And I think if
00:51:23.020 they think the
00:51:23.620 issue is important
00:51:24.740 and they're
00:51:25.740 willing to take
00:51:26.320 a hit to their
00:51:26.940 political futures,
00:51:29.040 absolutely.
00:51:30.240 That would be a
00:51:31.080 completely rational
00:51:31.960 decision.
00:51:33.020 Oh, yeah, it'll
00:51:33.740 hurt me politically,
00:51:34.660 but I have to say
00:51:35.500 what I have to say.
00:51:36.240 Perfectly
00:51:37.920 respectable.
00:51:39.060 I have full
00:51:40.060 respect for that
00:51:40.960 point of view.
00:51:42.800 It's just not
00:51:43.360 mine.
00:51:49.560 Where would
00:51:50.240 someone take an
00:51:50.880 IQ test?
00:51:52.180 Well, the
00:51:53.380 Mensa organization
00:51:54.420 offers them,
00:51:55.640 because you have
00:51:56.220 to pass some
00:51:57.560 kind of IQ test
00:51:58.400 to be in the
00:51:58.900 organization.
00:52:00.000 So that's where
00:52:00.780 I took one.
00:52:01.280 And you need
00:52:02.580 to be, I
00:52:03.460 wouldn't take an
00:52:03.980 online IQ test.
00:52:08.020 Yeah.
00:52:09.380 Oh, that's true.
00:52:10.220 Somebody on
00:52:10.760 Locals says,
00:52:11.820 if you're already
00:52:12.460 a local subscriber,
00:52:13.720 you've already
00:52:14.140 passed the IQ test.
00:52:15.520 I endorse that.
00:52:16.860 Yeah.
00:52:17.260 If you're already
00:52:17.900 a local subscriber,
00:52:19.620 even if you
00:52:21.060 weren't a genius
00:52:21.700 before, you
00:52:22.400 probably are
00:52:23.000 pretty close now.
00:52:23.800 Your IQ is
00:52:30.580 over 140.
00:52:31.420 Is that good?
00:52:32.520 Yeah, that's
00:52:33.040 pretty close to
00:52:33.960 the Mensa
00:52:34.500 thing.
00:52:37.600 So the thing
00:52:38.240 you should know
00:52:38.620 about IQ tests
00:52:39.480 is that they're
00:52:40.080 not, one is
00:52:41.560 not equivalent
00:52:42.180 to the other.
00:52:43.500 So if you
00:52:44.020 scored a 135
00:52:45.140 on one IQ test,
00:52:47.040 it could actually
00:52:47.660 be a better
00:52:48.200 score than a
00:52:48.880 140 on a
00:52:50.460 different test,
00:52:51.560 because they're
00:52:52.120 not exactly
00:52:52.800 comparable like
00:52:53.600 that.
00:52:54.400 So being in
00:52:56.420 the top, let's
00:52:57.160 say, 1% would
00:52:58.540 be a different
00:52:59.020 number on two
00:53:00.000 different tests.
00:53:04.860 Yeah, if you
00:53:05.680 were tested in
00:53:07.140 grade school,
00:53:09.100 your IQ can
00:53:09.820 actually change
00:53:10.820 quite a bit.
00:53:11.560 Did you know
00:53:11.960 that?
00:53:13.120 That your
00:53:13.800 measurable IQ
00:53:15.580 can go up if
00:53:17.640 you're doing
00:53:17.980 all the right
00:53:18.440 stuff.
00:53:19.400 So if you've
00:53:20.020 developed your
00:53:20.640 brain and all
00:53:21.800 the good ways
00:53:22.440 that people
00:53:22.760 develop their
00:53:23.280 brains,
00:53:23.600 your IQ
00:53:24.300 would be
00:53:24.640 higher than
00:53:25.780 it was when
00:53:26.200 you were a
00:53:26.500 kid.
00:53:27.540 And functionally,
00:53:28.640 it would be a
00:53:29.020 lot higher.
00:53:29.840 Because if you
00:53:30.420 have a talent
00:53:31.000 stack and
00:53:32.300 you've exposed
00:53:32.840 yourself to
00:53:33.540 the right kinds
00:53:34.280 of skills that
00:53:34.900 work well
00:53:35.300 together so you
00:53:35.960 can see the
00:53:36.380 whole field,
00:53:37.880 yeah, you
00:53:38.480 would have, so
00:53:39.660 that's what I
00:53:40.340 say about the
00:53:41.000 talent stack.
00:53:42.140 The talent
00:53:42.540 stack is when
00:53:43.140 you organize
00:53:43.980 your skills that
00:53:45.800 really fit
00:53:46.340 together.
00:53:47.280 So you're not
00:53:48.140 just somebody who
00:53:49.060 knows about
00:53:50.160 climate change,
00:53:51.400 you're somebody
00:53:51.860 who's also a
00:53:52.420 good public
00:53:52.820 speaker, and
00:53:54.140 suddenly you're
00:53:54.640 twice as useful.
00:53:56.080 You know about
00:53:56.660 the topic, but
00:53:57.420 you can also
00:53:57.860 teach it twice
00:53:58.780 as good.
00:53:59.540 So if you're
00:53:59.980 putting together
00:54:00.640 different skills
00:54:01.660 that fit together
00:54:02.400 well, especially
00:54:03.820 the ones that
00:54:04.440 give you, let's
00:54:05.320 say, insight
00:54:06.020 into the other
00:54:07.200 fields, then
00:54:08.620 you're functionally
00:54:09.480 smarter.
00:54:11.080 Your useful IQ
00:54:13.240 for all practical
00:54:14.620 purposes could be
00:54:15.580 up 20 or 50%.
00:54:17.240 So anybody
00:54:18.240 says you can't
00:54:18.980 get smarter is
00:54:19.780 totally wrong.
00:54:20.980 You can totally
00:54:21.720 get smarter.
00:54:23.000 You just have to
00:54:23.840 do the obvious
00:54:24.500 things that would
00:54:25.020 make you that
00:54:25.480 way.
00:54:28.980 Somebody says
00:54:29.700 their IQ is
00:54:30.260 420.
00:54:32.040 Well, I'll
00:54:32.700 tell you, my
00:54:33.220 IQ is 420 at
00:54:35.460 least part of
00:54:35.960 every day.
00:54:36.980 Part of every
00:54:37.780 day my IQ is
00:54:38.680 420, which is
00:54:40.580 interesting because
00:54:41.360 I do feel
00:54:42.440 smarter for the
00:54:43.160 first 10 minutes.
00:54:43.900 Yeah, you
00:54:49.980 should feel
00:54:50.460 smarter now than
00:54:51.240 you were in high
00:54:52.520 school.
00:54:53.180 I would think
00:54:53.860 so.
00:54:56.340 All right, that
00:54:57.060 ladies and
00:54:57.520 gentlemen is the
00:54:58.420 conclusion of my
00:55:00.160 prepared notes.
00:55:01.120 I'm going to go
00:55:01.640 talk to the
00:55:02.300 locals people
00:55:03.240 privately, and
00:55:05.000 thanks for joining
00:55:05.860 YouTube.
00:55:10.360 I'll talk to you
00:55:11.180 tomorrow.
00:55:13.900 You think my
00:55:14.740 IQ dropped 10
00:55:15.740 points with the
00:55:16.380 jabs?
00:55:17.520 Maybe.
00:55:18.000 Maybe.