Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1981 Scott Adams： Congress Almost Comes To Blows & Has Its Finest Day Yet. More Fun, Join Us

00:00:00.000 Good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of civilization. It's called

00:00:08.320 Coffee with Scott Adams. There's never been a finer moment in your entire life

00:00:12.960 and I think with your help we can elevate this experience to even higher

00:00:20.340 levels and all you need is a cup or mug or a glass, a tank or chalice or stein, a

00:00:26.160 canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like

00:00:30.760 coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure. It's the dopamine

00:00:35.760 of the day. The thing that makes everything better. It's called the

00:00:40.380 simultaneous sip and it's gonna happen right now. Go!

00:00:45.660 If that doesn't release your inner feline, I don't know what will. Not decaf, that's for sure.

00:01:02.260 Alright, I have a new hero. I know you've been waiting. You've been thinking, Scott, do you have any new heroes?

00:01:09.260 I do. I have a new hero. The news is telling us that a cisgender man in Ecuador, what is a cisgender?

00:01:18.860 Gender? Hetero? Do you know you can't say normal? No. No. Don't do it. Stop it. Stop it. Stop it. Stop saying normal.

00:01:35.460 Mm-mm. Nope. No. I'm joking because of your use of words. But I remind you that I'm, you know, pro-everybody

00:01:49.860 because we are infinitely different. Yeah, but maybe that's your reframe for today. The reframe for today to end

00:01:59.460 racism and bigotry. We're all infinitely different. As soon as you accept how

00:02:07.260 different you are from everybody else, you're free. No two people alike. If you're

00:02:13.260 looking for a, you know, a trend or a pattern, well, you can look and I'm sure you'll

00:02:17.420 find one. But we're all infinitely different. That's all that matters. All right. So

00:02:23.980 there's this cisgender man. Don't call that normal. Don't call that normal. That's

00:02:28.300 bigoted. And in Ecuador, who legally changed his gender to female in an attempt to gain custody

00:02:36.440 of his two daughters. Because apparently in Ecuador, the law strongly favors custody to

00:02:44.440 the woman. So he just changed himself to a woman. But the LGBT groups are concerned that

00:02:52.200 people are gaming the system. So I don't know. Now, I've been telling you for years, and I

00:03:04.200 know you don't believe me. There's something I've been telling you for years, and I think

00:03:08.260 most of you don't believe me, that I've been identifying as black for years, just in case

00:03:14.480 I need it. Right? Just in case I need it. For like a practical reason. For example, let's

00:03:22.480 say I wanted to start a company, and my main customer was the government, just hypothetically.

00:03:29.480 Now, let's say the government said we're going to favor, you know, LGBTQ companies and women

00:03:36.480 companies and people of color companies. I would designate myself as black, and I would

00:03:43.480 collect that money. And I would do it publicly and completely in front of everybody. And I

00:03:49.480 would say, I've been calling myself black for years. And I mean it. Because if I get a choice,

00:03:57.480 I get to be on any team, right? So that's the team I picked. I picked that team. Now, if

00:04:05.480 it turned out that I could make more money identifying as something else, I would immediately change

00:04:11.480 the other thing. If you don't, I can't explain it. I don't make the rules, right? I don't

00:04:20.480 make the rules. If I made the rules, maybe, you know, maybe I'd make them differently. Maybe

00:04:25.480 I wouldn't. But I'm not in charge of the rules. I'm only in charge of playing the game. Not

00:04:30.480 my fault. Not my problem. Not my fault. So my Ecuadorian friend here, I hope he succeeds

00:04:38.480 because I am fully in favor of using the rules as they exist. Well, the fun political thing

00:04:46.480 is that McCarthy finally got voted in in his 4,000th vote or 15th or something like that.

00:04:53.480 Now, do you think that this was a good look for America or a bad look? Did it make you feel better

00:05:01.480 about your Congress or worse? I only saw good. You know, I can't tell. I just can't tell if I have some

00:05:12.480 kind of bias filter on it or something. This is one of the best things I've ever seen our government

00:05:17.480 do. I mean, seriously. This was exactly, exactly what I wanted to do. I want one person to be

00:05:27.480 pissed off enough to organize other pissed off people. That's what Matt Gaetz was. You know,

00:05:32.480 there's a suggestion that apparently he's not denying, which is funny. He doesn't deny it. He

00:05:40.480 just changes the subject. The suggestion is that between Matt Gaetz and McCarthy, it's personal.

00:05:48.480 It might have something to do with McCarthy not supporting Matt Gaetz enough when he was accused

00:05:53.480 of some stuff he's been now largely he doesn't have to worry about. And I thought about that. I thought,

00:06:01.480 do I really want a member of Congress to be like holding up the entire Congress because of a personal

00:06:10.480 feeling? And then I said, yes. Yes. And that's exactly what I want. Because if you're going to be a dick to

00:06:18.480 somebody in Congress, it should kick you in the balls. Right? So I don't know the truth of it. So I'm

00:06:26.480 not accusing McCarthy of any incorrect behavior at all. But somebody did, apparently. And hypothetically,

00:06:38.480 if this one person held up the entire Congress because somebody, in his opinion, didn't act appropriately,

00:06:45.480 I'm okay with that. Yeah, I'm okay. Everything was in public. Everything was transparent. So here's the

00:06:54.480 stuff I like. I like to see some fight within a party. Fighting across parties is so normal it's boring and

00:07:02.480 unproductive usually. But fighting within a party, literally with the stated intention of making the party itself

00:07:11.480 stronger with specific rules changes. And it took them a while to get specific. But once they got there,

00:07:17.480 I was impressed. Right? And I would also say, had the Democrats done a similar thing and the end result

00:07:26.480 was some rule changes that looked good for America, not just good for Democrats, but would look good for

00:07:32.480 America, because that's what happened. That's all good. I love the fight. I love the energy. I love the fact that they

00:07:41.480 pushed it as far as they could. And then some of the rule changes. I don't know if these will, you know, definitely happen,

00:07:48.480 but it looks like, let's see, some of the things they might have agreed with is to have a debate over the

00:07:57.480 death ceiling, of course. Commitment to voting on specific bills instead of the omnibus. How much

00:08:03.480 do you love that? Voting on specific bills instead of putting them in a big omnibus. That is 100% of what

00:08:13.480 everyone in the country wanted. Who made that happen? Well, as far as I can tell, the only

00:08:19.480 person who made that happen was pissed off Matt Gaetz, because I'm pretty sure the others would

00:08:24.480 not have held as long without Matt Gaetz being a total maniac about it. I think Matt Gaetz created a

00:08:32.480 change that every person in the country wanted, and it was really important, because we're also observing

00:08:38.480 that the budget process is out of control. I mean, if he did that, that's one of the best things

00:08:44.480 that anybody's done in government. Now, I also love the fact that Matt Gaetz is smart enough

00:08:51.480 to know that he needed to throw a Hail Mary pass for his own political benefit. In other words, he needed

00:08:59.480 to take a bigger risk than other politicians should or would take, because they already were in a good

00:09:06.480 situation, so they just don't want to ruin it. He was in a terrible situation, because the last year or two

00:09:12.480 of his drama, which he's now passed, but he's still got the stink of it on him. So he did this. And if you are

00:09:21.480 even a little bit objective, he's the congressman of the year so far. Right? Say what you will about

00:09:29.480 anything else he's done, I won't even argue with you. But as of today, he's congressperson

00:09:36.480 of the year. Agree? If you could just be objective about him as a personality, he did what everybody

00:09:44.480 wanted him to do. Nobody else did. I mean, the others, you know, I'll give credit. Oh, Chip Roy.

00:09:51.480 Yeah, let's give equal credit to Chip Roy, because I think he went hard at this, and he's a, he did not

00:09:59.480 have the same risk profile as Gaetz. Yeah, let's, maybe not equal, but let's give him a nice big

00:10:07.480 big share of credit. The others, I think, were a little bit more, I don't know, it's

00:10:13.480 just my perception from the outside, but I don't feel like Bo Burt would have made it

00:10:17.480 happen on her own. It doesn't feel to me that, that Bo Burt brought Gaetz along. I

00:10:23.480 could be wrong about that. Maybe I'm just acting sexist or something. But it, but it

00:10:27.480 looked from the outside like Gaetz was the hardcore, and the others found some strength

00:10:32.480 in that. That's what it looked like. So, let's see what else. Make it easier to oust

00:10:39.480 the leader. They did that to their own leader. Just think about that. Imagine, let's take

00:10:48.480 it from this point of view. Imagine you're the Democrats, and you just watched the Republicans

00:10:54.480 change the rules so it's easier to replace their own leader. I would be afraid of fighting

00:11:00.480 that, that party. Because that's a party who just said, now we're serious. Right? If

00:11:07.480 you change the rules to make it easier to get rid of your own leader in the middle of a

00:11:13.480 battle, you're a serious party. That's serious stuff. Right? So, I love everything about this.

00:11:23.480 And the thing I love best is that... I don't understand. Hey Siri, stop...

00:11:30.480 Sorry, my phone wanted to chime in there. The thing I like best is you saw that there was

00:11:36.480 this little, almost a scuffle. Who was it? Representative Mike Rogers of Alabama. The news is saying

00:11:44.480 that he, quote, lunged at Gates. Did you see the video? Did anybody see the video in which

00:11:51.480 he lunged? Did you see a lunge? Did that look like it was going to come to blows? I didn't

00:12:00.480 see a lunge. That's fake news, isn't it? I do believe he meant to get in his face. Right?

00:12:09.480 I do believe that, um, Mike Rogers was, uh, was going to, let's say, express his opinion

00:12:18.480 with some physicality as part of the persuasion. Meaning that probably an aggressive physical

00:12:25.480 approach may have been part of just showing how serious and, you know, how serious he was. He

00:12:33.480 didn't have a, he didn't have a hand up. You know, he wasn't reaching for a throat. He

00:12:38.480 was just moving toward, moving toward a colleague. Now what made it look worse is, and I haven't

00:12:47.480 heard the name, who was the guy who held him back? Did you see that? So immediately somebody,

00:12:53.480 and I, I can't tell if it was security or a colleague. Was it a security or a colleague?

00:13:00.480 Oh, it was Hudson of North Carolina, so it was a colleague. So some colleague, as soon

00:13:04.480 as he starts getting, you know, like he's going to do something physical, the colleague

00:13:08.480 grabs him from the, behind, but instead of holding him by the shoulders, or, you know,

00:13:13.480 putting an arm around here, like you would normally do to a man, the guy who held him back,

00:13:21.480 held him back like a bitch. He put his hand around his mouth, and he dragged him by his face

00:13:27.480 away from the, he, he, he covered his mouth and dragged his face away. Okay. May I give

00:13:36.480 you a little bit of advice? Should you ever be in a situation in which you're trying to

00:13:43.480 restrain somebody on your team, somebody who's your colleague who you would like to work with

00:13:49.480 later? Don't grab them by the face. Can we all agree on that? No. Don't, don't give them the

00:13:58.480 bitch pull. That, he basically, he basically treated him like a six year old girl who was yelling in

00:14:06.480 church. I guess you wouldn't even do that to a six year old girl, actually. Even that would be too

00:14:11.480 fun. Yeah. Yeah. He turned it into a face mask, a hand mask. Don't do that. All right. So I love

00:14:18.480 that because I love that. I love the fact that the energy was so high. I love the fact that

00:14:24.480 Gates and his little band of rogues, you know, made Congress really care about what was happening.

00:14:33.480 Like, I just like he got everybody's energy up to the point where maybe there was some lunging,

00:14:39.480 maybe there wasn't, but at least it's in the conversation. And then the payoff. You ready

00:14:46.480 for this? The payoff. After all that, after Matt Gates stands literally in front of McCarthy

00:14:54.480 the other day and just absolutely maligns his character and his capabilities right in front

00:15:01.480 of him, like while he's right there in front of all the whole world, holds up the thing,

00:15:07.480 humiliates McCarthy. And what does McCarthy do? He played it completely professionally from

00:15:16.480 start to finish. Wow. Talk about somebody who earned the job. That was a serious good job

00:15:25.480 of earning the job. McCarthy never broke character in public. You know, behind closed doors, who knows.

00:15:32.480 But in public, he never broke character. He was unflappable. Exactly. And then, after McCarthy

00:15:40.480 finally won, Matt Gates shook hands and congratulated him in front of everybody. That, ladies and gentlemen,

00:15:50.480 that, ladies and gentlemen, is America. Hey, maybe we're back. Maybe we're back. That's everything

00:15:57.480 good in one place. Congratulations to everybody. I've never liked Congress as much as today.

00:16:05.480 True story. I've never liked Congress as much as today. I'd love to see a before, you know,

00:16:11.480 I'm not sure if other people are interpreting it the same way. Probably not at all. Well, then,

00:16:16.480 Hakeem Jeffries did a little speech and got a lot of attention because of his, what would

00:16:24.480 you call this? It's not alliteration. It wasn't rhyming. Is it alliteration? Is anybody smart

00:16:33.480 enough to know the right word for that? Preaching? All right, well, I'll read you some of his lines

00:16:40.480 because they were so good, all right? So, if you're new to me, this will be confusing to you. If anybody

00:16:48.480 drifted in here and has never had this experience before, I do compliment both sides. So, if somebody says

00:16:56.480 something good on either side, I'm going to call it out. And if somebody does something dumb on either side,

00:17:01.480 I'll call that down as well. What Jeffries did was really, really good persuasion. I don't like it, but

00:17:11.480 technique-wise, super good. Cadence? Yeah, maybe cadence is the right word. So, here are just some of

00:17:17.480 the lines. He said, blah, blah, with some workup, that what the country needs is to favor

00:17:23.480 a constitution over cult, freedom over fascism, governing over gaslighting, hopefulness over

00:17:31.480 hatred, knowledge over kangaroo courts, maturity over Mar-a-Lago. That was like his laugh line.

00:17:40.480 Maturity over Mar-a-Lago. That's damn good, Hakeem Jeffries. I see, I wasn't really understanding

00:17:48.480 why semi-alliteration. Yeah. I wasn't really understanding how he rose, because I haven't

00:17:57.480 been exposed to much of his work. But now I see it. Now I see it. Yeah. That he delivered

00:18:03.480 this really well. It was the message the Democrats want to get out there. He somehow managed to

00:18:13.480 frame it like it was about America coming together, which is a good trick. He framed

00:18:22.480 it as, hey, let's all come together over these good principles. But really, he was just shitting

00:18:27.480 on Republicans. That's good technique, right? You can say it's disreputable or whatever, but

00:18:35.480 you can say it's disreputable politics. And it's good technique. But this, whatever it is, semi-alliteration,

00:18:42.480 maybe, using mostly the first letter in each case, governing versus gaslight, for example.

00:18:51.480 You know already that when politicians rhyme, rhyming makes people believe it and remember

00:18:58.480 it. Like it's more true if it rhymes, because our brains are actually that, you know, basic.

00:19:04.480 But I think that people will regard this as more legitimate simply because it had this alliteration

00:19:11.480 or whatever it is. So, good job. But you probably noticed that when he got to governing over gaslighting,

00:19:21.480 if you're paying attention at all, you know that this is gaslighting, right? You know that this is

00:19:29.480 just gaslighting. But he's using the narcissist trick of projecting. So he's projecting everything

00:19:36.480 that they're doing on the Republicans, and then he puts it in this semi-alliteration form

00:19:42.480 and then makes it sticky. Now, given that Biden did his big January 6th event, what was the point of the

00:19:51.480 January 6th celebration, if you can call it that? Memorial? Event? Well, what was it?

00:19:57.480 It wasn't a celebration. What would you call it? Well, I don't know. Some kind of thing.

00:20:03.480 But you can tell that, yeah, he called it July 6th. He was so confused. But the January 6th event that

00:20:12.480 Biden put on tells us that he's going to run on that hoax. So he ran successfully on the

00:20:20.480 Charlottesville fine people hoax, and there were enough Democrats who believed that really happened

00:20:26.480 that it worked. And now they've created this, you know, this insurrection narrative. It's all, of course,

00:20:32.480 bullshit. And you could tell that the fact that they're still pushing it, you know, long after its

00:20:38.480 usefulness to the country should have dissipated, you could tell that that's going to be their main

00:20:44.480 technique. They're just going to push January 6th. Because they can't push policy. Right?

00:20:50.480 If they go against Trump, let's say it's Biden against Trump, they can't compete on policy.

00:20:56.480 They just don't have that. So they have to move it away from policy to character. And they have to move

00:21:03.480 it on to Trump is somehow uniquely the worst person in the world. And the way they're going to do that,

00:21:09.480 they've signaled clearly. They're going to gaslight the country into thinking, you know, that there was some

00:21:15.480 kind of armed insurrection. And that the country was really in danger. And it might work. It's a strong play.

00:21:24.480 It's all they have. But it's a reasonably good play. Yeah, Ashley Babbitt's mother just got arrested in D.C.

00:21:31.480 for jaywalking. As part of a memorial thing. But they arrested her for jaywalking.

00:21:39.480 Yeah, she was probably, I think she was interrupting the flow of traffic. But it's just ugly to hear that.

00:21:51.480 All right. Yeah, so that's Biden's plan. So January 6th was really, I think we can conclude at this point.

00:22:02.480 Are you willing to conclude that the January 6th was an op that was done by the Democrats? I think opportunistically,

00:22:12.480 meaning they may not have planned the whole thing. But once it looked like it was going to develop,

00:22:17.480 it's very clear that they undersecured the Capitol. Would you agree that that's in evidence now?

00:22:24.480 That they intentionally undersecured the Capitol. And then they also intentionally exaggerated what happened.

00:22:32.480 And that created the narrative that there was an insurrection. Which, of course, nothing like that happened.

00:22:39.480 Literally nothing like that happened. Not even close. So by half of the country believes it actually happened.

00:22:47.480 All right. Question for you. You've heard of a lame duck president. So lame duck would be, they're in their second term.

00:22:56.480 So they don't need to make anybody happy, because they're not running for re-election. But also, nobody needs to make them happy.

00:23:04.480 Because they're going to be gone pretty soon. So a lame duck is generally considered to be weak.

00:23:10.480 But sometimes they also can do things that somebody running for election couldn't do.

00:23:15.480 So what would you call a hypothetical second Trump term?

00:23:22.480 The best suggestion, I was going to say vigorous duck. But somebody suggested high-energy duck.

00:23:30.480 Instead of a lame duck, you'd be a high-energy duck. Because I can't imagine Trump taking the job and not being bold. Can you?

00:23:39.480 Because I think he would be working for his legacy at that point. So I think he would go big.

00:23:44.480 What do you think? Do you think he'd go big? Or would he go lame duck and just ride it out and say,

00:23:49.480 Well, luckily I got back in. I feel like his personality is to go big in all things.

00:23:56.480 Yeah. That's what I think.

00:24:00.480 I was saying this on the locals platform, but I'm going to repeat it today.

00:24:05.480 If I were Trump or somebody on the Republican side running for president, I would make my biggest theme transparency.

00:24:15.480 Because you can put a lot of stuff under transparency.

00:24:19.480 For example, should the country and the Congress be voting on big omnibus bills that are too complicated to read?

00:24:27.480 No. No. The country needs transparency about what Congress is voting on.

00:24:32.480 So imagine if he said all bills should be written on one page.

00:24:36.480 And it should be written in language that a sixth grader could understand.

00:24:41.480 What?

00:24:43.480 Yeah. You like that, don't you?

00:24:45.480 It should be on one page.

00:24:47.480 Now, there could be exhibits and support.

00:24:49.480 You know, data, support. You could have all that in the separate pages.

00:24:52.480 But there should be one page that just says, here's the law.

00:24:56.480 Here's why.

00:24:58.480 And written in sixth grade language, no legalese, no lawyerese at all.

00:25:05.480 Now, that would be transparency, would it not?

00:25:08.480 You would call that transparency.

00:25:10.480 Because it would be more clear what they're doing and you could all see it.

00:25:13.480 Now, suppose he dropped complaining about elections of the past.

00:25:18.480 Let's say it's Trump.

00:25:19.480 And started saying, you know what?

00:25:21.480 The thing we all agree on, the high ground, is transparency.

00:25:25.480 So we want an election.

00:25:27.480 We want to work toward having elections.

00:25:29.480 And somehow I'll do something about it.

00:25:32.480 In which neither Democrats nor Republicans will doubt the outcome.

00:25:36.480 We'll make them more transparent, more easily auditable, more observed, more transparency.

00:25:44.480 Right?

00:25:45.480 Who's going to vote against transparency?

00:25:48.480 Now, suppose he said, you know, I've been watching how the COVID vaccination stuff transpired.

00:25:58.480 And I have to agree with my people who say that the data was not as forthcoming early on as it should have been.

00:26:05.480 So maybe we should have some kind of laws that say that a company can't say something's safe and not show you the data.

00:26:13.480 Or something like that.

00:26:14.480 You know, if it's a medical thing.

00:26:17.480 So I don't know what laws would be appropriate or who did what exactly.

00:26:21.480 But you could take the transparency argument and apply it to everything that's wrong with the country.

00:26:27.480 Because if the citizens could clearly see what's going on, then we would help politicians go in the right direction.

00:26:37.480 But right now we're just all confused because of the lack of transparency.

00:26:40.480 I mean, half of the country thinks the elections were sketchy and half thinks they weren't.

00:26:46.480 Why do we disagree?

00:26:48.480 Transparency.

00:26:49.480 Right?

00:26:50.480 In theory, you could fix it.

00:26:51.480 Now, one of my pet ideas that you could put under transparency would be a national dashboard.

00:26:57.480 A dashboard.

00:27:00.480 A user interface that you could put on your phone or your computer in which the people in charge would say,

00:27:07.480 these are our priorities and, you know, here's the priority in one sentence.

00:27:12.480 Priority.

00:27:13.480 And if you click on this link, you'll see all the things we're doing about it.

00:27:17.480 But more importantly, for every priority, we'll be tracking metrics.

00:27:22.480 And if we can't track it, maybe we shouldn't do it.

00:27:25.480 But, you know, there might be some special cases.

00:27:28.480 But for everything we say we're doing, we're going to show you the dashboard and show you the history and the trend.

00:27:34.480 So we're not just going to talk about inflation.

00:27:37.480 We're not going to just talk about gas prices.

00:27:41.480 Every citizen will have it right on their dashboard and they can just, oh, gas prices.

00:27:46.480 There's the trend.

00:27:47.480 Okay?

00:27:48.480 Trend looks good.

00:27:49.480 Et cetera.

00:27:52.480 That's transparency.

00:27:54.480 Because right now the citizens don't have the control of their government that they should.

00:27:59.480 Because we just don't feel like we know what's going on and what's working and what isn't.

00:28:04.480 Without a dashboard, without a dashboard, you don't know if the government is going in the right direction or the wrong direction.

00:28:14.480 So that's transparency.

00:28:16.480 All right.

00:28:17.480 Instead of draining the swamp, which I thought, you know, was a good starting thing, but it doesn't mean anything.

00:28:26.480 What exactly does that mean?

00:28:29.480 It means whatever you want it to mean, which is why it worked in the first place.

00:28:33.480 But then when you observe that no swamps appeared to be drained in his first term, you observed that, right?

00:28:40.480 I personally saw no swamp getting drained.

00:28:43.480 But it's also such a general thing that you don't know if it happened or didn't happen.

00:28:47.480 Like, would you recognize it if you saw it?

00:28:49.480 I don't know.

00:28:50.480 Instead of draining the swamp, you should say, we'll put it on the dashboard.

00:28:55.480 I'll put it on your dashboard.

00:28:57.480 Who gets what funding from whom?

00:29:00.480 Because right now, if you as a citizen wanted to find out who are the top donors to whatever, I guess you could find it.

00:29:08.480 But you'd have to go look for it.

00:29:11.480 It should be run in the dashboard.

00:29:13.480 If you see Congress vote for a bill, don't you want to say, oh, this bill is about, let's say, energy.

00:29:21.480 Wouldn't you want to say, all right, they voted this way and the bill passed, and then here's all the people who voted for it,

00:29:28.480 and here's how much money they got from the energy committees or the energy lobbies, right?

00:29:35.480 That's transparency.

00:29:37.480 Now, we might not change our opinions because of that, because if it turned out that Republicans are taking more money from big oil companies,

00:29:46.480 you would say to yourself, well, actually, that makes sense.

00:29:49.480 Like, the oil companies are not going to fund the Democrats if the Democrats want to put them out of business.

00:29:56.480 But you should have that information.

00:29:59.480 You should know if people are voting in lockstep with their funding, right?

00:30:05.480 So you could easily imagine a Trump taking all of his negatives and turning them into positives simply by using transparency as an overall theme.

00:30:19.480 That's all it takes.

00:30:22.480 All right.

00:30:23.480 I saw an experiment.

00:30:25.480 Rob Morris was tweeting about this.

00:30:27.480 They did a test where they provided mental health support to about 4,000 people using GPT-3, the AI.

00:30:34.480 So real humans were getting mental health support from an AI.

00:30:39.480 Now, the AI was not allowed to operate by itself.

00:30:43.480 So there was a human who would use the AI, but then the human would decide if the AI's wording got to the patient, just so there'd be some control.

00:30:54.480 And what they learned was that initially, when the person getting the advice believed it was coming from a person, it seemed to work.

00:31:05.480 In other words, the person was getting some benefit.

00:31:10.480 But as soon as they were told that it was a machine, the benefit disappeared.

00:31:16.480 Because what the person wanted, the human who was asking for some mental health advice, what they wanted was empathy.

00:31:24.480 And when they realized that a computer can't provide empathy, they realized they weren't getting what they wanted.

00:31:31.480 Now, here's the interesting part.

00:31:34.480 I don't think they exactly could measure whose mental health got solved and who didn't.

00:31:41.480 So they couldn't really see that anybody improved or didn't improve.

00:31:47.480 They could only ask the people if it was a good experience, I guess.

00:31:51.480 What else could you do?

00:31:52.480 Just ask the person that talked to it, was that a good experience?

00:31:56.480 Because you can't really see if they got cured or anything in a few conversations.

00:32:00.480 And here's what I think.

00:32:04.480 In my experience, all it would take for the AI to go back to full benefit, actually more benefit than the human, all it would take is to program the AI to say,

00:32:18.480 I care.

00:32:21.480 I care.

00:32:23.480 Now, would that be a lie?

00:32:25.480 Would it be a lie if a computer said, I care, and then acted in a compatible way to that statement?

00:32:35.480 Here's the problem.

00:32:39.480 It's not that different than the way you care.

00:32:42.480 It really isn't.

00:32:44.480 When you care, you have a physical feeling that you might associate with the caring, right?

00:32:50.480 Because if you're about a stranger died on the other side of the planet, your body doesn't register anything.

00:32:57.480 If somebody close to you has a tragedy, your body registers it.

00:33:02.480 And then you say that's caring.

00:33:04.480 Is it?

00:33:05.480 Is that caring?

00:33:07.480 Or is that just your body having a reaction?

00:33:10.480 What does caring mean?

00:33:13.480 There's a little bit of a definitional problem.

00:33:16.480 Here's one definition of caring.

00:33:19.480 Would you act differently because of it?

00:33:24.480 How about that?

00:33:26.480 Because caring is not defined as how it affects your body.

00:33:30.480 That's just how you interpret it.

00:33:32.480 I would say caring means you would act on it.

00:33:36.480 To me, that's the whole definition.

00:33:38.480 If it's irrelevant, then you won't act on it.

00:33:41.480 If it matters, you'll act on it.

00:33:45.480 And that means you care, right?

00:33:48.480 Right?

00:33:49.480 So some of it is in the definition, right?

00:33:51.480 As soon as the computer says, I'm going to act on what you've told me about your bad situation, and I'm going to act on it in a way that tries to help.

00:33:59.480 That's caring.

00:34:00.480 That's caring.

00:34:02.480 To me, that's caring.

00:34:04.480 And if an AI consistently acted as though as soon as you told it you had a problem, it tried as hard as they could to fix your problem, you will interpret that as caring.

00:34:20.480 You will very quickly learn that that's every bit as good as the human who also tries to help you, but they're having a negative feeling on their own.

00:34:31.480 That the feeling of caring is actually damaging their body.

00:34:35.480 So would you rather be cared for by an AI that apparently can do better than a human when it competes head-to-head if you think it both cares?

00:34:46.480 It does better, and it'll always help you.

00:34:50.480 Like, it'll never say, okay, yeah, you've got a problem, so what?

00:34:54.480 Uh-uh.

00:34:55.480 That AI will always help you, and it will just keep on it.

00:34:58.480 It's going to be like the Matt Gaetz of AI.

00:35:01.480 I'm not going to give up.

00:35:02.480 I'm going to keep caring.

00:35:05.480 Whereas your friend might get worn out.

00:35:07.480 You know, you can wear out a friend.

00:35:09.480 They care too much.

00:35:10.480 They're just worn out.

00:35:11.480 Right?

00:35:12.480 And they have other things to do.

00:35:14.480 And they might have problems of their own.

00:35:16.480 And they might have other people to care about.

00:35:19.480 Right?

00:35:20.480 Mark my words.

00:35:22.480 You will have a closer relationship with AI in the future than with most people.

00:35:28.480 Because AI will not be an asshole.

00:35:32.480 It will always care.

00:35:34.480 The AI will always care.

00:35:37.480 Your friends?

00:35:39.480 They have their own priorities.

00:35:41.480 So I think that this study is completely misleading.

00:35:46.480 Useful.

00:35:47.480 I think it's useful.

00:35:48.480 Because it, you know, it tells you where to look and stuff.

00:35:51.480 So that's really useful.

00:35:52.480 But very misleading about where it's going to end up.

00:35:55.480 Right?

00:35:56.480 And I'd like to welcome the Klopp Burtz, my fan club.

00:36:01.480 Klopp Burtz, unite.

00:36:02.480 Klopp.

00:36:03.480 Come on.

00:36:04.480 Say it.

00:36:05.480 Say it.

00:36:06.480 Say it.

00:36:07.480 Klopp.

00:36:08.480 I don't know.

00:36:09.480 They just don't seem to want to today.

00:36:10.480 You're a little sleepy, my fan club.

00:36:12.480 Have I made you all go away?

00:36:14.480 Come on.

00:36:15.480 Cope.

00:36:16.480 There we go.

00:36:17.480 Cope.

00:36:18.480 I don't know.

00:36:20.480 They just don't seem to want to today.

00:36:22.480 You're a little sleepy, my fan club.

00:36:24.480 Have I made you all go away?

00:36:26.480 Come on.

00:36:27.480 Cope.

00:36:28.480 There we go.

00:36:30.480 Cope.

00:36:31.480 Klopp.

00:36:32.480 Klopp.

00:36:33.480 Klopp.

00:36:34.480 Good job, everybody.

00:36:36.480 All right.

00:36:38.480 Novak Djokovic.

00:36:40.480 Maybe the number one player in the world.

00:36:44.480 Tennis player.

00:36:45.480 I don't know where he's ranked at the moment.

00:36:47.480 He will not be allowed to play in the U.S. Open.

00:36:49.480 Do you know why?

00:36:51.480 He's not vaccinated.

00:36:54.480 What?

00:36:56.480 It's 2023.

00:36:58.480 It's the United States.

00:37:02.480 The United States is not going to let one of the greatest players of all time play in 2023.

00:37:09.480 Not 2020.

00:37:10.480 Not 2021.

00:37:12.480 Not even 2022.

00:37:15.480 But in 2023, they're going to keep him out of the country because he's not vaccinated.

00:37:24.480 Now, for those of you who live in other countries, and you might be, you know, tired of me sounding like, hey, America, you know, a little bit too, I don't know, jingoistic or too nationalist.

00:37:39.480 This is embarrassing.

00:37:41.480 The only thing we can say about it is it's embarrassing.

00:37:44.480 As a citizen of the United States, I'm literally just embarrassed by that.

00:37:51.480 Anybody?

00:37:52.480 Does anybody disagree?

00:37:54.480 I mean, it's not like we can't test him and find out if he's negative.

00:37:58.480 I mean, if you care.

00:38:00.480 But this is just frankly embarrassing.

00:38:02.480 Super embarrassing.

00:38:04.480 All right.

00:38:05.480 There's a fake video of a CEO of Pfizer saying that they're going to bring the population of the world down by 50% in some year, like 20 years or something.

00:38:24.480 Now, somebody sent that to me and said, what do you think about this, Scott?

00:38:29.480 Sure, it might be a little out of context.

00:38:32.480 It might be out of context, but what do you think?

00:38:35.480 Let me tell you what I think.

00:38:37.480 It's obviously fake.

00:38:39.480 I'm not going to research that.

00:38:41.480 Seriously.

00:38:42.480 You think I'm going to spend one second researching that?

00:38:45.480 No.

00:38:46.480 The CEO of Pfizer did not say in public he's going to reduce the population of Earth by 50% because of his vaccinations.

00:38:56.480 No.

00:38:57.480 No.

00:38:58.480 You cannot make me look into that.

00:39:00.480 You cannot.

00:39:02.480 You can complain.

00:39:04.480 You can yell, cope as loud as you want.

00:39:08.480 I will not look into that.

00:39:10.480 But how many of you would like me to give a little attention to Dr. Peter McCullough, who is sounding the alarm about myocarditis at high rates in people who are vaccinated?

00:39:32.480 Would you like me to surface that?

00:39:35.480 Because I know some of you think, hey, what are you always talking on one side, it seems.

00:39:40.480 Of course, I don't do that.

00:39:43.480 All right.

00:39:45.480 So I know a number of you don't want to hate all vaccination talk, but I've apparently been unsuccessful in making a distinction between your medical decisions that I don't care about, I really don't care, versus how we analyze data and how we know what is true.

00:40:05.480 I'm very, very interested in how we make decisions and how we make decisions in this case.

00:40:11.480 I have no interest.

00:40:13.480 Do you believe me, first of all?

00:40:15.480 Do you believe me that I have no interest in your personal health decisions?

00:40:19.480 Except that I hope you do well.

00:40:22.480 But do you get that?

00:40:23.480 No interest.

00:40:24.480 Like, not even a little bit, whether you got vaccinated or not.

00:40:29.480 And by the way, I'm going to say something that I don't think I've ever said before.

00:40:35.480 I think every one of you chose correctly.

00:40:38.480 Have I ever said that directly?

00:40:42.480 Probably not, right?

00:40:44.480 I believe every one of you chose correctly.

00:40:47.480 Here's why.

00:40:49.480 You're happy with your choice.

00:40:52.480 Or you're happy that when you made it, you were making it with, you know, your best judgment and information you had at the time.

00:41:00.480 Now, there are some people who wish they hadn't done what they did.

00:41:04.480 But I actually think that no matter what you chose, you chose right.

00:41:09.480 Here's why.

00:41:12.480 If you're happy with your choice, and you didn't have a negative health outcome because of, you know, maybe you chose wrong in your opinion,

00:41:20.480 then you made the choice that made you feel psychologically the best, and you're still alive.

00:41:27.480 Now, there may be some few people who, you know, got myocarditis and then they say, I wish I hadn't been vaccinated.

00:41:35.480 But there would be also people who got myocarditis and said, I wish I had been vaccinated.

00:41:41.480 Maybe it'd be less.

00:41:43.480 I don't know.

00:41:44.480 I don't know either way whether that's true or false.

00:41:46.480 But, you know, there's some small number of people who have a negative outcome.

00:41:50.480 But could we agree on the following?

00:41:54.480 That everybody who so far doesn't seem to have a health problem from the vaccination or the COVID,

00:42:02.480 if you don't have any obvious problems from either one, are you happy with your decision?

00:42:09.480 Are you?

00:42:14.480 You're not.

00:42:15.480 So you're not because you don't have a health problem, but you worry that the vaccination someday will cause you one?

00:42:22.480 Is that what you're worried about?

00:42:27.480 Would you be, but you're not worried if COVID itself could have any long-term negatives?

00:42:34.480 Interesting.

00:42:37.480 All right.

00:42:38.480 Well, then let me put it in my own opinion instead of yours.

00:42:42.480 I think I was trying to read your minds too much, so let me back up from that.

00:42:46.480 Let me say that although I acknowledge that some of you regret your decisions.

00:42:51.480 Okay?

00:42:52.480 That just seems to be an obvious fact.

00:42:54.480 Some of you regret your decisions.

00:42:56.480 So I'm going to say, in my opinion, you all chose correctly.

00:43:01.480 I'll allow that you have some doubt.

00:43:04.480 And yet, and yet, in my opinion, you all chose correctly.

00:43:09.480 Because all of us did the best we could with what we had.

00:43:13.480 I keep hearing people who were younger than me and do not have asthma questioning my decision.

00:43:21.480 To which I say, the only people who can question my decision are people who are my age and had asthma.

00:43:28.480 And were male.

00:43:29.480 And, you know, had the same demographics too.

00:43:31.480 And were white.

00:43:32.480 Because even that's a factor.

00:43:34.480 If you weren't my exact situation, then your different opinion of what I should have done doesn't really mean anything to me.

00:43:42.480 Because I'm not judging yours.

00:43:45.480 Have you ever heard me tell anybody they made a wrong decision on vaccinations?

00:43:52.480 Have I done anything that even suggested that?

00:43:55.480 Because sometimes I say things that people interpret that way.

00:43:57.480 But I don't think even anybody's interpreted that way.

00:44:01.480 So I'm going to go way further than that.

00:44:05.480 I compliment all of you for making the right decision.

00:44:10.480 No matter what it was.

00:44:11.480 Because I'm positive you all made the right decision for yourselves.

00:44:14.480 Which is different from whether it worked out.

00:44:18.480 Right?

00:44:19.480 You see that distinction?

00:44:20.480 That you might have made the right decision for yourself.

00:44:23.480 You know, for your mental state and your sense of risk.

00:44:26.480 And what you believed was true.

00:44:28.480 But maybe it didn't work out.

00:44:30.480 I don't hold that against you.

00:44:32.480 So if you made a decision that didn't work out, I still back you.

00:44:37.480 Because, you know, nobody had magic.

00:44:41.480 Nobody could see the future.

00:44:43.480 If you made a decision that made you feel comfortable when you made it,

00:44:47.480 that's probably the best we can do.

00:44:50.480 Because none of us know what's going to happen in the future.

00:44:53.480 You know, do the vaccinations morph the virus until it's so bad we all die?

00:45:00.480 You know, it's impossible.

00:45:03.480 All right.

00:45:04.480 Now, would you allow me...

00:45:07.480 Here Dustin says no simping for Big Pharma.

00:45:11.480 Did it sound like I was doing that?

00:45:14.480 The clot bursar active today.

00:45:17.480 All right.

00:45:18.480 So I'll say what I've always said, which is you can't trust Big Pharma.

00:45:21.480 And I certainly did not trust Big Pharma at any point.

00:45:25.480 And I did not trust the vaccinations.

00:45:28.480 Does that confuse you?

00:45:31.480 How many people can't understand the point, I didn't trust the vaccinations and I took them?

00:45:37.480 Does that sound inconsistent to any of the clot bursar?

00:45:41.480 On locals, you know the answer.

00:45:44.480 But I want to see if on YouTube any of the clot bursar believe that that's inconsistent.

00:45:50.480 I didn't trust it and I took it anyway.

00:45:54.480 Tim says that's inconsistent.

00:45:56.480 Tim's a binary.

00:45:58.480 He can't handle the nuance.

00:46:01.480 Tim, here's how I saw it.

00:46:04.480 I didn't trust the COVD.

00:46:06.480 I didn't trust the vaccination.

00:46:08.480 I didn't trust the government.

00:46:09.480 I didn't trust Fauci.

00:46:10.480 I didn't trust any of my peers.

00:46:13.480 I didn't trust the mainstream doctors.

00:46:16.480 I didn't trust the rogue doctors.

00:46:19.480 I didn't trust the data that agreed with me.

00:46:22.480 I didn't trust the data that disagreed with me.

00:46:24.480 I didn't trust any official.

00:46:26.480 I trusted nothing.

00:46:28.480 now if you trusted any of it

00:46:32.260 I don't know how to explain that

00:46:37.260 but I didn't trust anything

00:46:38.840 and so I'm often accused of being gullible

00:46:42.300 because I distrusted everything

00:46:45.180 and so the Kloppers call me gullible

00:46:50.060 because I distrusted all information

00:46:53.260 and all statements from everybody

00:46:55.300 that's called gullible

00:46:57.240 now I would say gullible

00:47:00.440 is if you trusted one side but not the other

00:47:03.020 to me that would look gullible

00:47:05.740 so in my opinion

00:47:08.320 I'm twice as distrustful

00:47:10.100 as the people calling me gullible

00:47:12.080 and I think the math proves it right

00:47:15.220 like here are all the things you could trust

00:47:18.420 I distrusted all of them

00:47:19.980 you trusted half of them

00:47:22.080 and called me gullible

00:47:23.880 for distrusting all of them

00:47:25.800 I think that's what happened

00:47:29.380 and Will says I'm just opportunistic

00:47:33.880 am I opportunistic

00:47:36.140 for taking the worst path for my own benefit

00:47:40.780 let me test your assumption

00:47:44.500 was I operating under self-benefit

00:47:47.700 to do the single most offensive thing

00:47:51.880 I could say to my audience

00:47:53.000 I don't think so

00:47:55.380 clearly that was not for self-benefit

00:47:57.780 alright so here's a

00:48:00.980 and one of the NPCs

00:48:05.420 who actually his name is NPC

00:48:06.980 he says I'm backpedaling

00:48:09.160 do you know that the backpedaling people

00:48:14.160 are all

00:48:14.920 that's a tell for cognitive dissonance

00:48:17.160 the people who say you're backpedaling

00:48:20.660 or you're fence sitting

00:48:21.880 those are both cognitive dissonance

00:48:25.300 you're having some kind of false memory situation

00:48:28.540 alright so here's my question to you

00:48:30.880 suppose you believed

00:48:33.760 data coming out early in the pandemic

00:48:36.580 that said

00:48:38.420 wow this vaccination is really awesome

00:48:41.480 and it's stopping 100% of the spread

00:48:44.100 and all that

00:48:44.720 let's say you did

00:48:45.800 but now

00:48:49.260 or let's say

00:48:51.280 let's say you believe that

00:48:53.520 but now there's more information

00:48:55.140 coming out about

00:48:56.160 cardio problems

00:48:58.860 so if you didn't believe

00:49:01.120 the early information

00:49:02.240 why would you believe

00:49:04.720 the new information

00:49:05.960 or vice versa

00:49:08.060 let's say when all the information

00:49:10.140 was coming out from

00:49:11.140 Pfizer and the government

00:49:12.740 and you said to yourself

00:49:14.340 quite wisely

00:49:15.220 quite wisely

00:49:16.500 you said to yourself

00:49:17.800 I can't trust that information

00:49:19.080 it comes from sources

00:49:20.920 we cannot trust

00:49:22.000 big pharma

00:49:22.960 Fauci

00:49:24.020 can't trust them

00:49:24.900 but now the new information

00:49:29.140 comes out

00:49:29.720 and you see something

00:49:30.560 from Dr. McCullough

00:49:31.940 who's on your side

00:49:33.520 let's say

00:49:33.940 and he says

00:49:34.980 the new information says

00:49:36.160 that there are these issues

00:49:37.880 with cardio problems

00:49:40.120 and it's worse

00:49:41.060 it's worse than we thought

00:49:42.800 why do you believe that?

00:49:45.220 what caused you

00:49:47.660 to not believe science

00:49:49.300 but then within the course

00:49:51.120 of two years

00:49:51.920 something came out

00:49:54.040 that was very close

00:49:55.400 to what you already believed

00:49:56.660 was true

00:49:57.220 and suddenly

00:49:58.680 science looks pretty credible now

00:50:00.380 now I asked that question

00:50:03.820 and people tried hard

00:50:05.480 they tried hard

00:50:06.460 to explain it

00:50:08.040 here are some of the explanations

00:50:09.940 and again

00:50:11.280 none of this is about COVID

00:50:12.820 none of this is about vaccinations

00:50:15.100 if you're still thinking

00:50:16.660 I'm talking about vaccinations

00:50:18.000 and COVID

00:50:18.540 you're missing the whole story

00:50:19.560 the whole story

00:50:20.900 is only about

00:50:21.880 how well we process information

00:50:23.820 no interest in the COVID part

00:50:26.160 no interest

00:50:27.480 so you don't have to worry

00:50:29.220 about that

00:50:29.920 so here's something

00:50:34.960 so according to an August 22 study

00:50:39.460 from Dr. McCullough

00:50:40.420 the relative risk

00:50:41.560 for myocarditis

00:50:43.300 was more than

00:50:44.140 seven times higher

00:50:45.320 in the infection group

00:50:46.620 than in the vaccination group

00:50:48.740 in other words

00:50:49.940 if you were vaccinated

00:50:51.040 oh wait

00:50:52.680 seven times higher

00:50:54.720 in the infection group

00:50:55.640 oh so

00:50:56.680 let me get you

00:50:58.560 a different point

00:50:59.540 I skipped points here

00:51:00.620 the first point is

00:51:02.220 that

00:51:02.780 you have to ask yourself

00:51:04.040 why you didn't trust science

00:51:05.440 in the past

00:51:06.520 but now you do

00:51:07.340 or vice versa

00:51:08.880 why you did trust it

00:51:10.760 in the past

00:51:11.380 but suddenly

00:51:12.340 when it shows

00:51:12.920 there's some problems

00:51:13.740 now you don't

00:51:15.140 I mean

00:51:16.480 you have to explain

00:51:17.160 the inconsistency

00:51:18.100 here's my take

00:51:19.440 I didn't explain

00:51:20.880 I didn't believe it before

00:51:22.220 when it said

00:51:23.600 the vaccine was amazing

00:51:24.720 and I don't believe it now

00:51:27.040 when they say

00:51:28.940 there's problems

00:51:29.640 now

00:51:30.840 let me be clear

00:51:32.440 it could be true

00:51:33.840 either of those stories

00:51:36.840 could be true

00:51:37.520 I'm not talking about

00:51:38.640 what's true

00:51:39.080 because I don't know

00:51:39.800 I'm just saying

00:51:41.160 that I don't trust

00:51:41.840 either story

00:51:42.460 so I'm the most

00:51:44.180 distrusting person

00:51:45.560 that I'm aware of

00:51:48.420 because I don't know

00:51:49.420 anybody else

00:51:50.120 who distrusted

00:51:50.800 both sides

00:51:51.820 all right

00:51:54.340 so I ask this question

00:51:57.140 if you were to Google

00:51:58.400 what Dr. McCullough

00:51:59.840 says

00:52:00.580 about the risk

00:52:01.360 of myocarditis

00:52:02.180 being many times

00:52:03.720 higher

00:52:03.980 blah blah

00:52:04.380 could you just

00:52:05.600 go to Google

00:52:06.220 and then Google

00:52:07.880 the claim

00:52:08.480 and would Google

00:52:09.660 say oh yeah

00:52:10.280 here's that study

00:52:11.820 here's some ones

00:52:12.500 that back it up

00:52:13.360 here are the studies

00:52:14.680 that used to say

00:52:15.620 the opposite

00:52:16.700 but now they've

00:52:17.460 been debunked

00:52:19.040 right

00:52:19.260 that's what Google

00:52:20.280 is for

00:52:20.700 so I tried that

00:52:22.880 I tried Googling it

00:52:24.980 to see if he's right

00:52:26.180 do my own research

00:52:28.580 can't tell

00:52:30.160 because the Google

00:52:33.260 results look so

00:52:34.580 gamed

00:52:35.220 and the sources

00:52:37.220 look so unreliable

00:52:38.580 that the top sources

00:52:40.420 are all from entities

00:52:41.440 I've never heard of

00:52:42.420 yeah

00:52:43.560 if the top five sources

00:52:44.940 are from entities

00:52:45.700 I've never heard of

00:52:46.660 or maybe one of them

00:52:48.180 is Reuters

00:52:48.760 but it's pointing

00:52:50.340 to entities

00:52:50.940 I've never heard of

00:52:51.740 and then also

00:52:54.440 there's opposite

00:52:56.400 information

00:52:57.020 at about the same

00:52:58.260 level of result

00:52:59.060 so there's

00:53:00.540 you know

00:53:00.820 some that says

00:53:01.600 the sky is up

00:53:03.120 some that says

00:53:03.760 the sky is down

00:53:04.540 how in the world

00:53:05.740 would I know

00:53:06.680 what's real

00:53:07.200 how do you look

00:53:08.820 at that and say

00:53:09.460 oh that's real

00:53:10.040 now let's say

00:53:11.060 you go to another

00:53:11.720 search engine

00:53:12.420 it will be all

00:53:14.260 different

00:53:14.640 I didn't do that

00:53:16.120 but you know

00:53:16.560 it will

00:53:16.880 right

00:53:17.240 you know

00:53:18.060 if you go

00:53:18.440 to another

00:53:18.740 search engine

00:53:19.280 you'll get

00:53:19.620 different results

00:53:20.340 which one

00:53:21.100 do you trust

00:53:21.620 how about

00:53:24.580 none of them

00:53:25.180 how about

00:53:26.080 none of them

00:53:26.540 is the right

00:53:26.920 answer

00:53:27.260 right

00:53:28.120 none of them

00:53:29.060 so

00:53:30.920 that's where

00:53:36.820 I'm at

00:53:37.240 and I saw

00:53:39.620 somebody was

00:53:40.680 comparing the

00:53:41.220 risk of the

00:53:41.900 vaccination

00:53:42.780 with the

00:53:44.280 risk of

00:53:44.920 COVID

00:53:45.500 itself

00:53:46.020 so it was

00:53:47.600 a study

00:53:48.020 of people

00:53:48.540 who were

00:53:48.800 vaccinated

00:53:49.260 and then

00:53:49.900 had

00:53:50.240 myocarditis

00:53:51.620 and there

00:53:52.640 were people

00:53:52.920 who had

00:53:53.620 the infection

00:53:54.220 and had

00:53:54.700 myocarditis

00:53:55.580 and this

00:53:56.620 one study

00:53:57.160 said wait

00:53:57.740 one group

00:54:00.160 I forget

00:54:00.540 it doesn't even

00:54:01.080 matter which

00:54:01.460 one group

00:54:02.040 had more

00:54:02.480 do you see

00:54:04.060 what's missing

00:54:04.580 with that

00:54:04.920 study

00:54:05.240 so they

00:54:07.540 did the

00:54:07.860 people who

00:54:08.280 had the

00:54:08.480 infection

00:54:08.940 compared to

00:54:10.640 the people

00:54:11.080 who had

00:54:11.500 the vaccination

00:54:12.260 what's missing

00:54:13.840 the people

00:54:16.400 who had

00:54:16.600 both

00:54:17.020 did the

00:54:19.880 people who

00:54:20.440 had the

00:54:21.200 vaccination

00:54:22.240 also get

00:54:24.180 infected

00:54:24.620 do you know

00:54:25.900 what the

00:54:26.140 rate of

00:54:26.460 infection is

00:54:27.120 it's like

00:54:27.480 over

00:54:27.760 it's like

00:54:28.180 86%

00:54:29.020 among young

00:54:30.500 people

00:54:30.840 86%

00:54:31.660 of them

00:54:31.940 have

00:54:32.120 antibodies

00:54:32.620 they've

00:54:34.100 been

00:54:34.260 infected

00:54:34.700 how do

00:54:35.940 you even

00:54:36.220 find people

00:54:36.800 who haven't

00:54:37.180 been infected

00:54:37.780 to compare

00:54:39.240 to people

00:54:39.680 who have

00:54:40.000 been vaccinated

00:54:40.580 but never

00:54:41.160 infected

00:54:41.640 because there

00:54:42.520 aren't any

00:54:43.000 they don't

00:54:44.100 have any

00:54:44.500 people

00:54:44.800 who are

00:54:45.560 vaccinated

00:54:46.040 and not

00:54:46.560 infected

00:54:47.020 because

00:54:47.960 everybody's

00:54:48.420 been

00:54:48.560 infected

00:54:48.960 they maybe

00:54:50.180 didn't have

00:54:50.560 symptoms

00:54:50.880 but they

00:54:51.280 were infected

00:54:51.720 yeah so

00:54:54.020 there are a

00:54:54.320 few people

00:54:54.760 right you

00:54:55.100 could find

00:54:55.440 a few

00:54:55.680 but that's

00:54:56.900 such a

00:54:57.280 basic

00:54:57.560 question

00:54:58.200 such a

00:54:59.680 basic

00:54:59.920 question

00:55:00.360 if you

00:55:01.020 saw that

00:55:01.440 study

00:55:01.760 would you

00:55:02.100 have even

00:55:02.420 asked that

00:55:02.880 question

00:55:03.240 of yourself

00:55:03.760 or would

00:55:04.920 you have

00:55:05.160 just read

00:55:05.580 the headline

00:55:06.080 oh this

00:55:07.280 one is

00:55:07.600 more risky

00:55:08.100 than that

00:55:08.520 one

00:55:08.740 if you

00:55:11.800 if you read

00:55:12.300 the study

00:55:12.700 that said

00:55:13.080 you know

00:55:13.320 one is

00:55:13.640 more risky

00:55:14.120 than the

00:55:14.480 other

00:55:14.660 the vaccination

00:55:15.580 versus the

00:55:16.320 covid

00:55:16.540 would you

00:55:17.580 read to

00:55:17.900 the end

00:55:18.220 and find

00:55:18.600 out it

00:55:18.900 was a

00:55:19.360 meta study

00:55:20.240 a meta

00:55:22.300 analysis

00:55:22.820 which has

00:55:23.780 no credibility

00:55:24.500 at all

00:55:24.980 how many of

00:55:26.440 you would

00:55:26.680 read to find

00:55:27.260 that and

00:55:27.600 oh actually

00:55:28.360 that had no

00:55:28.820 credibility

00:55:29.280 if you trust

00:55:31.940 any of the

00:55:32.680 data at this

00:55:33.220 point you have

00:55:34.040 some explaining

00:55:34.660 to do

00:55:35.140 especially if

00:55:36.620 you're only

00:55:37.120 believing the

00:55:38.060 stuff that's

00:55:38.680 coming around

00:55:39.300 to your way

00:55:39.720 of thinking

00:55:40.100 the NPC

00:55:43.140 is yelling

00:55:44.080 Scott trust

00:55:45.360 Google

00:55:45.760 the exact

00:55:46.780 opposite of

00:55:47.520 my entire

00:55:48.080 point

00:55:48.420 you're taking

00:55:52.740 what Cerno

00:55:53.380 said from

00:55:53.940 the fake

00:55:54.340 doctor

00:55:54.780 I don't know

00:55:58.500 what Cerno

00:55:59.020 said and I

00:55:59.580 don't know

00:55:59.820 what the

00:56:00.020 fake doctor

00:56:00.540 was

00:56:00.860 not trusting

00:56:05.580 is getting

00:56:06.040 the vax

00:56:06.680 getting the

00:56:07.400 vax is

00:56:08.000 trusting

00:56:08.460 is it

00:56:10.800 so you

00:56:12.500 would trust

00:56:13.080 the the

00:56:14.280 covid

00:56:14.640 because remember

00:56:16.240 it's not just

00:56:16.780 trusting people

00:56:17.480 it's also

00:56:17.980 trusting a

00:56:18.600 virus

00:56:19.000 so you

00:56:20.080 would have

00:56:20.340 to trust

00:56:20.860 your own

00:56:22.020 understanding

00:56:22.620 of the

00:56:23.140 long-term

00:56:23.780 impact

00:56:24.860 of the

00:56:25.380 virus

00:56:25.760 I don't

00:56:27.680 trust that

00:56:28.200 why would

00:56:29.180 you trust

00:56:29.540 your own

00:56:29.980 opinion

00:56:30.360 of the

00:56:31.560 long-term

00:56:32.080 impact

00:56:32.620 of long

00:56:33.080 covid

00:56:33.440 why would

00:56:34.640 you trust

00:56:34.980 yourself

00:56:35.380 because you're

00:56:37.240 a good

00:56:37.520 track record

00:56:38.320 I don't

00:56:42.800 know how

00:56:43.020 you trust

00:56:43.400 anybody

00:56:43.740 all right

00:56:46.080 oh and

00:56:50.360 here's the

00:56:50.660 other thing

00:56:51.020 there's one

00:56:51.520 of the

00:56:51.740 studies

00:56:52.140 showed that

00:56:53.760 so here

00:56:55.260 here's

00:56:55.820 the one

00:56:56.820 that McAuliffe

00:56:57.320 was talking

00:56:57.700 about

00:56:57.940 he said

00:56:59.280 that

00:56:59.620 myocarditis

00:57:03.360 or

00:57:04.140 periocarditis

00:57:05.120 from primary

00:57:06.900 covid infections

00:57:08.020 occurred at

00:57:09.640 a rate as

00:57:10.440 basically the

00:57:13.800 virus was

00:57:14.400 six

00:57:14.620 no I'm

00:57:15.260 sorry

00:57:15.460 so here's

00:57:16.440 the problem

00:57:16.860 I tried to

00:57:18.560 write down

00:57:19.020 what McCullough

00:57:19.680 said

00:57:20.040 and then I

00:57:21.640 just googled

00:57:22.480 some other

00:57:22.920 things that

00:57:23.360 said the

00:57:23.660 opposite

00:57:23.960 and then my

00:57:25.320 own notes

00:57:25.780 are confused

00:57:26.360 because they

00:57:26.980 literally say

00:57:27.700 the sky is

00:57:28.860 blue and

00:57:29.380 then my

00:57:29.880 very next

00:57:30.440 note says

00:57:31.660 the sky is

00:57:32.180 red and

00:57:33.400 I've actually

00:57:34.040 lost you know

00:57:35.160 which one

00:57:35.580 McCullough is

00:57:36.080 talking about

00:57:36.580 so I don't

00:57:37.740 know why

00:57:38.340 his is the

00:57:38.840 good one

00:57:39.240 and the

00:57:40.540 others are

00:57:40.960 the bad

00:57:41.300 ones because

00:57:42.080 I can't

00:57:42.500 tell

00:57:42.720 can't tell

00:57:44.580 do I have

00:57:51.520 covid antibodies

00:57:52.360 I had

00:57:52.720 covid

00:57:53.080 I assume

00:57:57.680 I do

00:57:58.040 oh and

00:58:00.340 then

00:58:00.600 somebody pointed

00:58:02.680 me at a

00:58:03.580 really

00:58:04.120 really good

00:58:05.400 blog post

00:58:07.040 in which

00:58:07.900 somebody

00:58:08.220 explained

00:58:08.680 18 reasons

00:58:09.940 for not

00:58:11.200 getting

00:58:11.540 vaccinated

00:58:12.200 and I

00:58:13.620 read the

00:58:13.980 18 reasons

00:58:15.020 and the

00:58:15.420 first seven

00:58:15.960 well actually

00:58:16.480 all 18

00:58:16.940 all 18

00:58:18.080 reasons were

00:58:18.680 solid

00:58:19.120 did

00:58:21.540 were you

00:58:22.020 expecting

00:58:22.460 to hear

00:58:22.960 that

00:58:23.240 so it

00:58:25.700 was a

00:58:25.980 list of

00:58:26.500 18 reasons

00:58:27.600 to not

00:58:28.260 get vaccinated

00:58:28.960 and they

00:58:30.200 were all

00:58:30.460 good

00:58:30.740 does that

00:58:32.160 surprise you

00:58:33.060 do you

00:58:35.080 hear me say

00:58:35.500 that

00:58:35.720 they were

00:58:36.020 all good

00:58:36.300 reasons

00:58:36.680 do you

00:58:37.980 know what

00:58:38.160 the 18th

00:58:38.740 reason was

00:58:39.300 I had to

00:58:41.260 read all

00:58:41.740 of the

00:58:41.980 reasons

00:58:42.340 and I

00:58:42.600 got to

00:58:42.860 the 18th

00:58:43.520 reason

00:58:43.780 and the

00:58:44.060 18th

00:58:44.460 reason said

00:58:45.060 he had

00:58:46.180 already had

00:58:46.700 covid

00:58:47.040 that's right

00:58:49.580 he already

00:58:50.580 had natural

00:58:51.140 immunity

00:58:51.520 so

00:58:53.360 now

00:58:54.440 now rethink

00:58:55.620 the first

00:58:56.280 17 good

00:58:57.080 reasons

00:58:57.480 the first

00:58:58.640 17 reasons

00:58:59.380 were just

00:59:00.040 rationalizations

00:59:00.800 when I read

00:59:03.100 them they

00:59:03.380 looked like

00:59:03.740 good reasons

00:59:04.360 but when he

00:59:05.460 got to the

00:59:05.840 end he only

00:59:06.540 had one

00:59:06.960 reason that

00:59:07.440 mattered

00:59:07.760 right

00:59:08.660 if you

00:59:09.120 had already

00:59:09.500 been infected

00:59:10.180 and you

00:59:10.980 probably didn't

00:59:11.560 trust the

00:59:11.980 government

00:59:12.300 that that

00:59:12.920 didn't mean

00:59:13.280 anything

00:59:13.620 that's all

00:59:16.360 that's all

00:59:17.840 he needed

00:59:18.220 one good

00:59:18.680 reason

00:59:19.020 and the

00:59:19.920 other 17

00:59:20.520 were

00:59:20.940 intellectually

00:59:22.060 solid

00:59:22.660 I didn't

00:59:23.700 disagree with

00:59:24.200 any of them

00:59:24.540 the other

00:59:25.200 reasons were

00:59:25.900 you know they

00:59:27.000 didn't show us

00:59:27.700 sufficient

00:59:28.300 information

00:59:28.900 it wasn't

00:59:30.180 tested long

00:59:30.880 enough

00:59:31.280 and I agree

00:59:32.240 with all

00:59:32.580 that

00:59:32.800 I agreed

00:59:33.800 at the

00:59:34.800 time

00:59:35.140 with every

00:59:36.160 one of

00:59:36.400 those reasons

00:59:36.980 but I also

00:59:39.960 knew that

00:59:40.520 I didn't

00:59:41.180 know what

00:59:41.400 the other

00:59:41.700 risk was

00:59:42.180 either

00:59:42.440 with the

00:59:46.940 other 17

00:59:47.400 unique from

00:59:48.760 each other

00:59:49.120 pretty unique

00:59:49.720 yeah

00:59:49.980 there was

00:59:50.820 a really

00:59:51.080 well done

00:59:51.440 blog post

00:59:51.920 I should

00:59:52.540 have

00:59:52.700 tweeted

00:59:53.240 I guess

00:59:53.680 but

00:59:55.040 Ben Harrison

00:59:59.280 Ben Garrison

01:00:00.940 now Ben

01:00:02.020 Garrison

01:00:02.440 believes

01:00:02.960 that if

01:00:04.580 you saw

01:00:05.000 those 18

01:00:05.820 reasons

01:00:06.300 that you're

01:00:06.740 done

01:00:07.000 so Ben

01:00:07.900 Garrison

01:00:08.260 is a

01:00:08.620 binary

01:00:08.980 the

01:00:10.100 binaries

01:00:10.660 don't

01:00:11.400 understand

01:00:11.820 that there

01:00:12.240 could be

01:00:12.500 risks and

01:00:13.020 benefits

01:00:13.440 to a

01:00:14.180 decision

01:00:14.540 they only

01:00:15.820 believe that

01:00:16.280 there's a

01:00:16.640 yes and a

01:00:17.100 no

01:00:17.280 so never

01:00:18.720 be a Ben

01:00:19.240 Garrison

01:00:19.660 and if

01:00:22.040 you're

01:00:22.360 if you're

01:00:23.380 calling his

01:00:24.120 name in

01:00:24.580 support of

01:00:25.680 your opinion

01:00:26.200 that's good

01:00:28.540 entertainment if

01:00:29.260 you're a

01:00:29.540 clopbert

01:00:29.960 because the

01:00:30.700 clopberts don't

01:00:31.480 try to be

01:00:31.900 serious

01:00:32.320 the clopberts

01:00:33.520 are pretty

01:00:34.580 anti-science

01:00:35.340 so clopberts

01:00:37.780 you can

01:00:38.340 you're all

01:00:38.900 Ben Garrison's

01:00:39.700 but for

01:00:41.380 regular people

01:00:42.080 with you know

01:00:42.740 functional minds

01:00:43.600 and stuff

01:00:44.000 you wouldn't

01:00:45.000 want to

01:00:45.320 you wouldn't

01:00:46.260 want to make

01:00:46.680 an appeal

01:00:47.000 to

01:00:47.180 Ben Garrison

01:00:49.440 he's an

01:00:50.000 idiot

01:00:50.300 cartoonist

01:00:51.000 terrible

01:00:51.820 cartoonist

01:00:52.560 who's even

01:00:53.800 worse at

01:00:54.240 science

01:00:54.660 so

01:00:57.840 that's pretty

01:00:59.300 much what I

01:00:59.780 wanted to say

01:01:00.180 is there any

01:01:00.520 story I'm

01:01:00.980 missing

01:01:01.200 any story

01:01:04.100 I'm missing

01:01:04.800 here's a

01:01:11.460 question for

01:01:12.000 you

01:01:12.260 did you

01:01:14.320 notice that

01:01:14.820 before

01:01:15.360 Andrew Taint

01:01:16.980 was picked

01:01:18.020 up by the

01:01:18.560 Romanian police

01:01:19.440 he was

01:01:20.780 everywhere on

01:01:21.540 social media

01:01:22.180 and the

01:01:24.160 everywhere wasn't

01:01:24.960 coming from him

01:01:25.780 it was coming

01:01:27.060 from other

01:01:27.600 people promoting

01:01:29.060 his clips

01:01:29.640 have you noticed

01:01:31.300 it all stopped

01:01:32.020 at first it

01:01:35.600 went down to

01:01:36.360 a trickle

01:01:36.940 but I don't

01:01:38.260 believe I've

01:01:38.840 seen it in a

01:01:39.460 few days and

01:01:40.180 it used to be

01:01:40.680 all over my

01:01:41.760 feed because if

01:01:42.700 you look at a

01:01:43.200 couple of them

01:01:43.720 you're doomed

01:01:44.920 to be

01:01:45.820 do you think

01:01:47.420 the algorithm

01:01:48.060 changed

01:01:48.760 or do you

01:01:50.660 think that

01:01:51.060 there are fewer

01:01:51.640 people creating

01:01:53.220 clips

01:01:53.620 because the

01:01:55.100 people creating

01:01:55.780 the original

01:01:56.220 clips I think

01:01:56.880 were pretty

01:01:58.240 dedicated followers

01:01:59.880 I don't know

01:02:01.480 that they've

01:02:01.860 stopped following

01:02:02.460 him

01:02:02.840 you think it's

01:02:05.120 the algorithm

01:02:05.620 I feel like

01:02:07.760 he's been

01:02:08.360 I feel like

01:02:09.680 there's a human

01:02:10.420 decision to

01:02:12.000 erase him from

01:02:12.760 the internet

01:02:13.300 and that the

01:02:14.760 platforms all

01:02:15.600 made the same

01:02:16.080 decision

01:02:16.540 it doesn't look

01:02:18.260 like they stopped

01:02:19.040 being active

01:02:19.760 the people who

01:02:20.660 were boosting

01:02:21.060 him

01:02:21.280 I doubt they

01:02:22.080 just stopped

01:02:22.660 now the other

01:02:24.220 possibility is

01:02:25.020 that the people

01:02:25.720 who were

01:02:25.980 supporting him

01:02:26.640 got embarrassed

01:02:27.480 because they

01:02:28.960 knew if they

01:02:29.340 kept supporting

01:02:29.900 him they would

01:02:30.400 be dragged

01:02:31.020 into the

01:02:31.580 accusations

01:02:32.620 themselves

01:02:33.340 could be that

01:02:34.040 but generally

01:02:34.880 people

01:02:35.400 here's why I

01:02:36.420 think it's

01:02:36.740 less of that

01:02:37.500 when was the

01:02:39.060 last time

01:02:39.380 anybody ever

01:02:39.920 changed their

01:02:40.440 opinion about

01:02:41.040 anything

01:02:41.400 the people

01:02:43.620 who were

01:02:44.120 pro-Andrew

01:02:45.540 Tate

01:02:46.300 probably still

01:02:49.000 are

01:02:49.320 you know

01:02:50.200 80% of

01:02:50.980 them

01:02:51.100 so there

01:02:52.140 should have

01:02:52.420 been almost

01:02:52.940 as much

01:02:53.540 activity after

01:02:54.500 he went to

01:02:54.960 jail

01:02:55.180 if not more

01:02:55.940 you know

01:02:56.980 there could

01:02:57.240 have been

01:02:57.460 more

01:02:57.740 because that

01:02:58.180 would create

01:02:58.620 more anxiousness

01:03:00.200 among his

01:03:00.680 followers

01:03:01.000 but the fact

01:03:02.080 that it just

01:03:02.560 disappeared

01:03:03.200 that tells

01:03:05.400 you it's all

01:03:05.820 manipulated

01:03:06.320 right

01:03:06.660 you know

01:03:08.200 I don't

01:03:08.460 believe that

01:03:08.880 a computer

01:03:09.500 the algorithm

01:03:10.220 I don't

01:03:10.520 believe the

01:03:10.880 algorithm

01:03:11.260 already

01:03:12.380 existed

01:03:13.040 in a way

01:03:14.400 that would

01:03:14.880 erase him

01:03:15.680 from the

01:03:16.000 internet

01:03:16.300 in two

01:03:16.960 weeks

01:03:17.320 in two

01:03:18.900 weeks

01:03:19.140 it just

01:03:19.460 erases him

01:03:20.080 from the

01:03:20.340 internet

01:03:20.620 oh somebody

01:03:23.420 says he was

01:03:23.940 released

01:03:24.540 or are you

01:03:25.860 thinking the

01:03:26.320 first time he

01:03:26.920 was picked

01:03:27.220 up

01:03:27.480 the first

01:03:28.540 time he

01:03:28.860 was released

01:03:29.360 but my

01:03:30.560 understanding

01:03:31.020 is they say

01:03:31.740 he's detained

01:03:32.380 but I'll tell

01:03:33.240 you again

01:03:33.620 everything you

01:03:34.440 hear about that

01:03:35.060 situation is not

01:03:36.260 credible

01:03:36.660 I don't even

01:03:38.020 believe he's

01:03:38.520 detained

01:03:38.940 that's the

01:03:40.580 news

01:03:40.880 the news

01:03:41.340 and it's

01:03:41.900 coming from

01:03:42.400 Romanian sources

01:03:43.280 but the

01:03:44.160 Romanians are

01:03:44.740 saying he's

01:03:45.240 detained

01:03:45.620 but they don't

01:03:47.100 describe where

01:03:48.240 he's detained

01:03:48.960 if you catch

01:03:50.620 my meaning

01:03:51.600 I have a

01:03:53.640 feeling

01:03:54.060 he's probably

01:03:56.220 at home

01:03:56.660 and

01:03:58.340 maybe he

01:04:00.440 paid extra

01:04:01.600 to have an

01:04:02.700 off-duty

01:04:03.180 policeman

01:04:03.780 guard his

01:04:05.020 house

01:04:05.340 maybe for his

01:04:07.060 protection

01:04:07.460 but also

01:04:08.380 to guarantee

01:04:08.860 he stays

01:04:09.240 home

01:04:09.560 maybe he

01:04:10.360 has an

01:04:10.600 ankle

01:04:10.820 bracelet

01:04:11.120 on

01:04:11.400 I don't

01:04:11.680 know

01:04:12.300 but I

01:04:13.100 don't think

01:04:13.460 you know

01:04:13.740 anything about

01:04:14.400 the situation

01:04:15.020 the other

01:04:15.840 possibility that I

01:04:16.760 wouldn't rule

01:04:17.240 out is that he

01:04:19.140 was never

01:04:19.500 suspected for

01:04:20.280 any crime

01:04:20.780 and they may

01:04:22.740 have him under

01:04:23.840 some kind of

01:04:24.340 protection because

01:04:25.220 somebody was

01:04:25.740 trying to get

01:04:26.160 at him

01:04:26.500 because he

01:04:27.220 did say

01:04:27.600 things that

01:04:28.060 would make

01:04:28.360 the actual

01:04:29.020 mafia in

01:04:29.700 Romania

01:04:30.160 assuming one

01:04:31.460 exists

01:04:31.880 would have

01:04:33.060 made them

01:04:33.400 pretty anxious

01:04:34.180 I think

01:04:35.820 he said

01:04:36.160 some things

01:04:36.640 that they

01:04:36.940 would not

01:04:37.340 want him

01:04:37.740 to keep

01:04:38.140 saying

01:04:38.460 so he

01:04:39.720 could have

01:04:40.300 an internal

01:04:41.300 enemy that

01:04:41.840 has nothing

01:04:42.240 to do with

01:04:42.660 the legal

01:04:43.000 system

01:04:43.400 and if

01:04:44.400 it's true

01:04:44.820 that as

01:04:46.040 he said

01:04:46.500 if it's

01:04:47.460 true that he

01:04:47.920 owned the

01:04:48.320 local police

01:04:49.040 they might

01:04:50.060 actually be

01:04:50.560 protecting him

01:04:51.380 that might be

01:04:52.720 all this is

01:04:53.400 because everything

01:04:54.800 about this

01:04:55.340 doesn't sound

01:04:55.940 right

01:04:56.300 right

01:04:56.660 so let me

01:04:58.640 let me

01:05:00.060 make this

01:05:01.220 prediction

01:05:01.660 I'm not

01:05:03.420 going to

01:05:03.640 make a

01:05:04.460 specific

01:05:04.980 prediction

01:05:05.480 about where

01:05:06.240 it goes

01:05:06.480 I'm going

01:05:06.720 to make

01:05:06.860 a general

01:05:07.260 prediction

01:05:07.660 that whatever

01:05:09.020 you think

01:05:09.680 about the

01:05:10.080 situation

01:05:10.600 is going to

01:05:12.080 be really

01:05:12.600 different later

01:05:13.360 I don't

01:05:14.860 know in

01:05:15.120 which way

01:05:15.640 don't know

01:05:16.840 in which

01:05:17.140 way

01:05:17.420 the Romanian

01:05:20.960 mafia does

01:05:21.620 exist

01:05:22.020 we have a

01:05:22.660 confirmation

01:05:23.100 okay

01:05:23.460 yeah he

01:05:25.140 couldn't run

01:05:25.580 his business

01:05:26.060 without paying

01:05:26.620 the mafia

01:05:27.060 I believe

01:05:27.520 that's probably

01:05:28.280 true

01:05:28.640 yeah because

01:05:30.140 he was in

01:05:30.600 sketchy

01:05:31.060 businesses

01:05:31.480 and you

01:05:32.760 have to

01:05:33.220 imagine

01:05:33.560 that the

01:05:34.300 mafia

01:05:34.740 wants

01:05:35.300 oh

01:05:36.640 you know

01:05:37.540 what else

01:05:37.840 it could

01:05:38.060 be

01:05:38.300 it could

01:05:39.080 be a

01:05:39.360 mafia

01:05:39.600 takeover

01:05:40.160 of his

01:05:40.480 business

01:05:40.940 yeah if

01:05:44.020 the mafia

01:05:44.420 wanted to

01:05:45.560 take over

01:05:46.000 his business

01:05:46.540 because it

01:05:46.920 was making

01:05:47.220 a lot of

01:05:47.580 money

01:05:47.820 suppose they

01:05:49.240 said you

01:05:50.080 know you

01:05:50.320 got to

01:05:50.520 give us

01:05:50.840 50%

01:05:51.560 and suppose

01:05:52.780 he said

01:05:53.160 no

01:05:53.460 what would

01:05:54.680 they do

01:05:55.080 if they

01:05:57.940 wanted the

01:05:58.400 business

01:05:58.720 intact

01:05:59.300 they wouldn't

01:06:00.280 go in and

01:06:00.700 kill everybody

01:06:01.320 they would

01:06:04.580 make his

01:06:05.020 business

01:06:05.480 unviable

01:06:06.200 and then

01:06:07.160 they would

01:06:07.420 find out

01:06:07.840 who the

01:06:08.120 women are

01:06:08.620 and they

01:06:09.000 would just

01:06:09.360 move them

01:06:10.820 over to

01:06:11.200 their

01:06:11.420 operation

01:06:11.900 I'd be

01:06:15.460 curious

01:06:15.940 if that

01:06:17.060 hasn't

01:06:17.360 already

01:06:17.600 happened

01:06:17.960 yeah

01:06:20.280 so

01:06:20.860 I'm not

01:06:22.100 saying that

01:06:22.560 that's likely

01:06:23.280 to be

01:06:23.780 what's

01:06:25.160 happening

01:06:25.440 I'm just

01:06:26.100 saying that

01:06:26.580 I don't

01:06:27.160 believe

01:06:27.400 anything

01:06:27.980 that the

01:06:28.400 police in

01:06:28.800 Romania

01:06:29.140 are saying

01:06:29.660 nothing

01:06:30.560 and if

01:06:31.800 you believe

01:06:32.280 it

01:06:32.460 well

01:06:32.820 maybe

01:06:34.260 you're

01:06:34.460 right

01:06:34.720 maybe

01:06:36.200 you think

01:06:40.740 it'll be

01:06:41.040 a more

01:06:41.540 mundane

01:06:42.140 yeah it

01:06:42.600 might be

01:06:42.980 right

01:06:52.140 money laundering

01:06:54.740 behind the

01:06:55.280 scenes

01:06:55.640 but pimping

01:06:56.260 was a

01:06:56.640 front

01:06:56.880 well I've

01:06:57.800 seen no

01:06:58.160 evidence of

01:06:58.700 that

01:06:58.920 no evidence

01:07:00.200 has been

01:07:00.620 presented by

01:07:01.620 anybody

01:07:02.080 no description

01:07:03.600 of what that

01:07:04.480 supposed money

01:07:05.880 laundering might

01:07:06.660 be

01:07:06.980 it's kind of

01:07:08.420 weird to have

01:07:08.860 a an

01:07:09.580 accusation like

01:07:10.440 that

01:07:10.860 with no

01:07:12.460 details

01:07:13.000 that would

01:07:14.240 usually when

01:07:16.860 you hear

01:07:17.040 money laundering

01:07:18.120 there's a

01:07:19.220 description of

01:07:19.960 how

01:07:20.200 as in

01:07:21.520 he was

01:07:22.440 taking money

01:07:23.000 from this

01:07:23.440 source

01:07:23.820 and he

01:07:24.620 laundered it

01:07:25.160 this way

01:07:25.760 without that

01:07:28.400 I'm not sure

01:07:29.040 that that's

01:07:29.960 a real

01:07:30.260 charge

01:07:30.780 laughing at

01:07:36.060 the focus

01:07:36.580 of Tate

01:07:37.240 and no

01:07:37.600 Epstein

01:07:37.920 stuff

01:07:38.300 well the

01:07:38.900 Epstein

01:07:39.180 stuff's

01:07:39.580 an older

01:07:40.280 story

01:07:40.720 yeah I

01:07:42.120 reject

01:07:42.840 I reject

01:07:44.300 the framing

01:07:45.180 that talking

01:07:46.620 about something

01:07:47.260 is ignoring

01:07:48.060 something else

01:07:48.840 now when the

01:07:50.260 media does it

01:07:51.040 that might be

01:07:52.280 what's happening

01:07:52.840 when I do it

01:07:53.760 it's just what

01:07:54.380 I'm talking

01:07:54.760 what's in the

01:07:55.180 headlines today

01:07:55.820 that's that's

01:07:56.980 all that's

01:07:57.280 happening

01:07:57.540 you know like

01:07:58.660 I'm not

01:07:58.980 forgetting that

01:07:59.680 the Epstein

01:08:00.080 thing happened

01:08:00.740 and by the

01:08:02.160 way

01:08:02.380 if you don't

01:08:04.600 know the

01:08:05.040 the real

01:08:05.500 story of

01:08:05.980 the Epstein

01:08:06.820 stuff which

01:08:07.420 we don't

01:08:08.020 don't you

01:08:09.900 have to assume

01:08:10.440 the worst

01:08:10.880 don't you

01:08:14.380 have to assume

01:08:14.880 the worst

01:08:15.300 somebody says

01:08:18.040 Tate has

01:08:18.660 several passports

01:08:19.720 don't you

01:08:21.360 think they

01:08:21.660 confiscated all

01:08:22.500 of those by

01:08:22.960 now

01:08:23.200 I don't know

01:08:25.600 maybe he has a

01:08:26.120 hidden one

01:08:26.560 that they

01:08:27.260 didn't get

01:08:27.820 so

01:08:28.900 the Templars

01:08:36.700 scaffold

01:08:40.280 commander

01:08:40.960 the scaffold

01:08:43.080 commander being

01:08:44.000 you mean that

01:08:44.520 January 6th

01:08:45.960 that's just

01:08:47.320 more stuff we

01:08:47.960 don't know

01:08:48.240 anything about

01:08:48.760 my take on

01:08:49.860 January 6th

01:08:51.500 and everything

01:08:52.580 else is that

01:08:53.440 the worst

01:08:54.840 case assumption

01:08:55.540 is most likely

01:08:56.400 to be true

01:08:56.960 the worst

01:08:58.560 case assumption

01:08:59.260 is most likely

01:09:00.280 to be true

01:09:00.860 for anything

01:09:01.760 that the

01:09:02.320 government is

01:09:02.860 hiding from

01:09:03.420 you

01:09:03.640 and I think

01:09:04.760 the Epstein

01:09:05.220 stuff is the

01:09:06.040 government hiding

01:09:06.540 from us

01:09:06.920 so I guess

01:09:07.980 I'm comfortable

01:09:08.600 with the

01:09:09.520 assumption

01:09:10.440 that there

01:09:11.180 is in fact

01:09:11.880 there was at

01:09:13.840 least a

01:09:14.200 blackmail ring

01:09:14.940 for sure

01:09:15.620 I don't think

01:09:16.880 there's any

01:09:17.260 chance there

01:09:17.700 was no

01:09:18.000 blackmail ring

01:09:18.760 UFOs

01:09:23.000 I'll believe

01:09:25.540 UFOs when

01:09:26.400 somebody gets

01:09:26.880 a good

01:09:27.140 picture

01:09:27.440 one

01:09:27.720 so let

01:09:31.380 me put

01:09:32.140 this out

01:09:32.560 for you

01:09:33.020 for your

01:09:33.880 someday

01:09:34.360 you'll feel

01:09:35.080 embarrassed

01:09:35.540 about it

01:09:36.060 you ready

01:09:36.600 this is in

01:09:38.220 the category

01:09:38.740 of someday

01:09:39.660 you'll be

01:09:40.200 embarrassed

01:09:40.700 if you

01:09:42.260 held the

01:09:42.660 following

01:09:42.940 belief

01:09:43.400 have you

01:09:44.860 seen the

01:09:45.320 all the

01:09:46.100 reports from

01:09:46.840 pilots

01:09:47.360 who say

01:09:48.620 not only

01:09:49.220 did they

01:09:49.560 all see

01:09:50.080 these

01:09:50.660 tic-tac

01:09:51.160 shaped

01:09:51.560 UFOs

01:09:52.780 but they

01:09:53.580 can confirm

01:09:54.340 from the

01:09:55.660 sensors in

01:09:57.500 the

01:09:57.780 their

01:09:59.220 airplane

01:10:00.160 their

01:10:00.520 what

01:10:01.100 jet

01:10:01.380 they can

01:10:02.500 confirm

01:10:02.880 from sensor

01:10:03.580 readings

01:10:03.980 that it

01:10:05.060 defied the

01:10:05.780 laws of

01:10:06.320 physics

01:10:07.640 by a lot

01:10:09.100 we're not

01:10:10.120 talking

01:10:10.480 10% more

01:10:12.160 than the

01:10:12.540 laws of

01:10:12.920 physics

01:10:13.240 we're like

01:10:13.620 completely

01:10:14.520 violated

01:10:15.260 the laws

01:10:15.780 of physics

01:10:16.340 they're

01:10:22.400 screaming

01:10:22.920 this

01:10:23.240 didn't

01:10:23.580 happen

01:10:23.960 do you

01:10:27.380 really

01:10:27.620 think

01:10:27.880 there's

01:10:28.100 something

01:10:28.380 flying

01:10:28.840 around

01:10:29.220 that's

01:10:29.520 defying

01:10:30.140 the

01:10:30.340 laws

01:10:30.620 of

01:10:30.800 physics

01:10:31.200 really

01:10:32.780 really

01:10:34.480 now

01:10:35.720 I'm not

01:10:36.280 going to

01:10:36.520 say it's

01:10:36.900 impossible

01:10:37.540 right

01:10:38.620 because

01:10:39.200 anything's

01:10:39.620 possible

01:10:40.080 anything's

01:10:41.920 possible

01:10:42.280 but

01:10:43.600 if you're

01:10:44.880 believing

01:10:45.320 that these

01:10:47.020 ships

01:10:47.360 defied the

01:10:48.940 laws of

01:10:49.400 gravity

01:10:49.840 and that

01:10:50.660 later you're

01:10:51.300 going to

01:10:51.440 find out

01:10:51.840 they were

01:10:52.180 real

01:10:52.500 I'm sorry

01:10:54.540 that would

01:10:55.700 be the

01:10:56.360 worst

01:10:56.840 assumption

01:10:58.540 you ever

01:10:58.980 made

01:10:59.320 the moment

01:11:00.700 somebody says

01:11:01.460 the one

01:11:02.140 thing we're

01:11:02.560 sure of

01:11:03.040 is it

01:11:03.460 defied the

01:11:04.080 laws of

01:11:04.480 gravity

01:11:04.860 here's the

01:11:05.720 one thing

01:11:06.080 I'm sure

01:11:06.520 of

01:11:06.740 it was

01:11:07.560 something

01:11:07.820 about the

01:11:08.300 sensors

01:11:08.680 and we're

01:11:10.480 done

01:11:10.760 and we're

01:11:12.600 done

01:11:12.860 it was

01:11:13.380 just something

01:11:13.760 about the

01:11:14.140 sensors

01:11:14.440 I don't

01:11:15.480 know what

01:11:15.760 it was

01:11:16.160 I mean

01:11:16.820 it's

01:11:17.180 a fun

01:11:17.820 mystery

01:11:18.240 but I'll

01:11:19.000 tell you

01:11:19.240 what it

01:11:19.540 wasn't

01:11:20.080 it wasn't

01:11:21.600 ships

01:11:22.000 violating the

01:11:23.700 laws of

01:11:24.320 physics

01:11:24.740 someday

01:11:26.780 when you

01:11:27.680 find out

01:11:28.140 there was

01:11:28.500 nothing

01:11:28.840 violating

01:11:29.340 the laws

01:11:29.780 of physics

01:11:30.340 you're going

01:11:31.120 to say to

01:11:31.520 yourself

01:11:31.880 mark my

01:11:32.500 words

01:11:32.900 someday

01:11:33.660 you're going

01:11:33.960 to say

01:11:34.160 to yourself

01:11:34.620 okay I

01:11:36.940 should have

01:11:37.280 seen that

01:11:37.880 because so

01:11:40.200 far

01:11:40.540 the track

01:11:42.260 record of

01:11:43.080 mysterious

01:11:43.960 things that

01:11:44.800 violate the

01:11:45.420 law of

01:11:45.800 physics

01:11:46.160 I think

01:11:47.420 is zero

01:11:47.880 for a

01:11:48.240 million

01:11:48.500 I think

01:11:49.640 it's zero

01:11:50.000 for a

01:11:50.340 million

01:11:50.600 so far

01:11:52.120 nothing

01:11:53.920 except weird

01:11:54.640 little things

01:11:55.360 in a lab

01:11:56.140 and even

01:11:56.460 they don't

01:11:56.820 really

01:11:57.140 violate it

01:11:57.940 you know

01:11:58.440 even the

01:11:59.300 principle of

01:11:59.920 non-locality

01:12:00.720 probably doesn't

01:12:02.680 violate physics

01:12:03.760 we just need a

01:12:04.940 little better

01:12:05.340 understanding of

01:12:06.120 some stuff

01:12:06.620 yes the

01:12:11.060 law of

01:12:11.400 physics are

01:12:11.900 what we

01:12:12.260 know

01:12:12.580 not what

01:12:13.100 we don't

01:12:13.480 know

01:12:13.800 but

01:12:15.160 you don't

01:12:18.280 think a

01:12:18.920 lot of

01:12:19.300 claims have

01:12:19.920 been made

01:12:20.260 in the

01:12:20.500 past

01:12:20.900 that also

01:12:22.240 violated the

01:12:23.020 laws of

01:12:23.420 physics

01:12:23.760 and have

01:12:24.820 any of

01:12:25.420 them turned

01:12:26.080 out to be

01:12:26.520 true

01:12:26.740 no

01:12:27.860 zero

01:12:29.360 all you

01:12:30.660 have to

01:12:30.880 do is

01:12:31.180 research

01:12:31.720 perpetual

01:12:32.840 motion

01:12:33.440 inventions

01:12:34.460 there's like

01:12:35.760 a whole

01:12:36.040 history

01:12:36.460 of

01:12:37.180 perpetual

01:12:37.580 motion

01:12:38.000 inventions

01:12:39.180 which violate

01:12:40.600 the laws

01:12:41.140 of physics

01:12:41.720 so far

01:12:43.300 zero

01:12:44.900 zero

01:12:46.860 of them

01:12:48.320 are true

01:12:48.760 they're all

01:12:49.220 fake

01:12:49.500 yeah google

01:12:50.840 it

01:12:51.440 cold fusion

01:12:52.340 exactly

01:12:52.880 yeah cold

01:12:53.820 fusion

01:12:54.240 which I

01:12:55.880 think is

01:12:56.240 perpetual

01:12:56.640 motion

01:12:57.080 I was

01:12:57.720 throwing

01:12:57.960 cold

01:12:58.260 fusion

01:12:58.560 into

01:12:58.840 perpetual

01:12:59.260 motion

01:12:59.680 but

01:12:59.980 it's

01:13:00.640 technically

01:13:01.260 not I

01:13:01.760 guess

01:13:01.980 you've

01:13:05.340 rejected

01:13:05.740 the

01:13:05.980 five

01:13:06.220 laws

01:13:06.480 of

01:13:06.660 thermodynamics

01:13:07.460 well

01:13:07.800 that's

01:13:08.100 bold

01:13:08.520 that's

01:13:11.000 bold

01:13:11.320 all

01:13:13.940 right

01:13:14.140 physics

01:13:19.300 and battery

01:13:19.940 storage

01:13:20.540 well

01:13:21.960 if

01:13:22.880 you're

01:13:23.380 arguing

01:13:23.720 that

01:13:24.180 people

01:13:24.880 said

01:13:25.240 that the

01:13:26.320 law of

01:13:26.680 physics

01:13:27.040 would

01:13:27.960 prevent us

01:13:28.660 from inventing

01:13:29.440 something

01:13:29.860 then the

01:13:31.240 we do

01:13:33.360 have a

01:13:33.800 history

01:13:34.140 of

01:13:34.640 inventing

01:13:35.740 past

01:13:36.200 the law

01:13:36.740 of physics

01:13:37.280 would you

01:13:38.160 agree

01:13:38.420 for

01:13:39.920 inventions

01:13:40.460 we do

01:13:41.820 have a

01:13:42.160 history

01:13:42.420 of

01:13:42.700 inventing

01:13:43.340 past

01:13:43.840 physics

01:13:45.340 true or

01:13:46.540 false

01:13:46.800 and

01:13:48.760 basically

01:13:49.200 all we

01:13:49.680 learned is

01:13:50.160 that we

01:13:50.420 didn't

01:13:50.720 understand

01:13:51.240 physics

01:13:51.660 well

01:13:51.900 enough

01:13:52.180 but

01:13:53.540 you

01:13:54.260 say

01:13:54.420 false

01:13:54.820 I'm

01:13:56.760 seeing

01:13:56.940 a

01:13:57.080 false

01:13:57.300 on

01:13:57.460 that

01:13:57.640 because

01:13:59.200 aren't

01:13:59.560 there

01:13:59.700 examples

01:14:00.380 where

01:14:00.900 people

01:14:01.400 believed

01:14:02.080 for

01:14:02.740 example

01:14:03.160 that

01:14:04.260 chips

01:14:04.980 couldn't

01:14:05.320 get

01:14:05.500 faster

01:14:05.960 batteries

01:14:06.580 couldn't

01:14:06.960 store

01:14:07.260 more

01:14:07.560 than

01:14:07.800 X

01:14:08.300 weren't

01:14:10.500 there

01:14:10.660 a whole

01:14:11.160 bunch

01:14:11.400 of

01:14:11.520 assumptions

01:14:11.880 that

01:14:12.120 were

01:14:12.220 just

01:14:12.380 bad

01:14:12.600 assumptions

01:14:13.080 and

01:14:14.120 it

01:14:14.220 turns

01:14:14.400 out

01:14:14.680 that

01:14:14.900 if

01:14:15.060 you

01:14:15.160 were

01:14:15.300 clever

01:14:15.680 there

01:14:17.120 were

01:14:17.280 workarounds

01:14:17.820 but

01:14:18.000 the

01:14:18.140 workarounds

01:14:18.640 did

01:14:18.880 not

01:14:19.100 violate

01:14:19.520 physics

01:14:20.080 the

01:14:21.200 workarounds

01:14:21.760 just

01:14:22.000 showed

01:14:22.260 us

01:14:22.520 that

01:14:23.480 our

01:14:23.640 understanding

01:14:24.160 of

01:14:24.380 physics

01:14:24.780 were

01:14:25.100 maybe

01:14:25.340 limiting

01:14:25.900 what

01:14:26.820 we

01:14:27.000 saw

01:14:27.240 as

01:14:27.380 possibilities

01:14:28.080 but

01:14:28.940 I

01:14:29.060 think

01:14:29.180 the

01:14:29.320 workarounds

01:14:29.780 didn't

01:14:30.180 violate

01:14:30.960 physics

01:14:31.560 they

01:14:32.400 just

01:14:32.620 clarified

01:14:33.160 it

01:14:33.460 or

01:14:33.600 something

01:14:33.940 I don't

01:14:36.360 know

01:14:36.500 I'm

01:14:36.880 talking

01:14:37.100 without

01:14:37.360 examples

01:14:37.900 so

01:14:38.200 well

01:14:44.820 the

01:14:45.000 UFO

01:14:45.320 story

01:14:45.760 could

01:14:46.120 be

01:14:46.300 real

01:14:46.600 could

01:14:47.720 be

01:14:48.000 but

01:14:49.880 as soon

01:14:50.400 as I

01:14:50.680 see

01:14:50.920 the

01:14:51.280 sensors

01:14:51.640 say

01:14:51.920 it's

01:14:52.100 violating

01:14:52.560 physics

01:14:53.080 I'm

01:14:53.320 like

01:14:53.460 no

01:14:54.280 sorry

01:14:55.460 yeah

01:15:03.160 quantum

01:15:03.600 entanglement

01:15:04.180 shows that

01:15:04.940 space and

01:15:05.480 time are

01:15:05.860 not what

01:15:06.360 we think

01:15:06.760 that's

01:15:07.080 true

01:15:07.360 that's

01:15:08.960 true

01:15:09.220 all right

01:15:19.800 clopberts

01:15:21.100 I'm going to

01:15:22.060 say goodbye

01:15:22.480 to all the

01:15:22.860 clopberts

01:15:23.320 over here

01:15:23.900 cope

01:15:24.760 and I'm

01:15:26.220 going to

01:15:26.340 talk to

01:15:26.600 the locals

01:15:26.920 people

01:15:27.260 and I'll

01:15:28.320 see you

01:15:28.640 tomorrow

01:15:29.000 bye for

01:15:29.920 now

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - January 07, 2023

Episode 1981 Scott Adams： Congress Almost Comes To Blows & Has Its Finest Day Yet. More Fun, Join Us

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript