Real Coffee with Scott Adams - January 07, 2023


Episode 1981 Scott Adams: Congress Almost Comes To Blows & Has Its Finest Day Yet. More Fun, Join Us


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 15 minutes

Words per Minute

140.8452

Word Count

10,634

Sentence Count

598

Misogynist Sentences

3

Hate Speech Sentences

10


Summary

A cisgender man in Ecuador legally changed his gender to female in order to gain custody of his two daughters. But LGBT groups are concerned that people are trying to game the system. And Matt Gaetz has been accused of being a racist.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of civilization. It's called
00:00:08.320 Coffee with Scott Adams. There's never been a finer moment in your entire life
00:00:12.960 and I think with your help we can elevate this experience to even higher
00:00:20.340 levels and all you need is a cup or mug or a glass, a tank or chalice or stein, a
00:00:26.160 canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like
00:00:30.760 coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure. It's the dopamine
00:00:35.760 of the day. The thing that makes everything better. It's called the
00:00:40.380 simultaneous sip and it's gonna happen right now. Go!
00:00:45.660 If that doesn't release your inner feline, I don't know what will. Not decaf, that's for sure.
00:01:02.260 Alright, I have a new hero. I know you've been waiting. You've been thinking, Scott, do you have any new heroes?
00:01:09.260 I do. I have a new hero. The news is telling us that a cisgender man in Ecuador, what is a cisgender?
00:01:18.860 Gender? Hetero? Do you know you can't say normal? No. No. Don't do it. Stop it. Stop it. Stop it. Stop saying normal.
00:01:35.460 Mm-mm. Nope. No. I'm joking because of your use of words. But I remind you that I'm, you know, pro-everybody
00:01:49.860 because we are infinitely different. Yeah, but maybe that's your reframe for today. The reframe for today to end
00:01:59.460 racism and bigotry. We're all infinitely different. As soon as you accept how
00:02:07.260 different you are from everybody else, you're free. No two people alike. If you're
00:02:13.260 looking for a, you know, a trend or a pattern, well, you can look and I'm sure you'll
00:02:17.420 find one. But we're all infinitely different. That's all that matters. All right. So
00:02:23.980 there's this cisgender man. Don't call that normal. Don't call that normal. That's
00:02:28.300 bigoted. And in Ecuador, who legally changed his gender to female in an attempt to gain custody
00:02:36.440 of his two daughters. Because apparently in Ecuador, the law strongly favors custody to
00:02:44.440 the woman. So he just changed himself to a woman. But the LGBT groups are concerned that
00:02:52.200 people are gaming the system. So I don't know. Now, I've been telling you for years, and I
00:03:04.200 know you don't believe me. There's something I've been telling you for years, and I think
00:03:08.260 most of you don't believe me, that I've been identifying as black for years, just in case
00:03:14.480 I need it. Right? Just in case I need it. For like a practical reason. For example, let's
00:03:22.480 say I wanted to start a company, and my main customer was the government, just hypothetically.
00:03:29.480 Now, let's say the government said we're going to favor, you know, LGBTQ companies and women
00:03:36.480 companies and people of color companies. I would designate myself as black, and I would
00:03:43.480 collect that money. And I would do it publicly and completely in front of everybody. And I
00:03:49.480 would say, I've been calling myself black for years. And I mean it. Because if I get a choice,
00:03:57.480 I get to be on any team, right? So that's the team I picked. I picked that team. Now, if
00:04:05.480 it turned out that I could make more money identifying as something else, I would immediately change
00:04:11.480 the other thing. If you don't, I can't explain it. I don't make the rules, right? I don't
00:04:20.480 make the rules. If I made the rules, maybe, you know, maybe I'd make them differently. Maybe
00:04:25.480 I wouldn't. But I'm not in charge of the rules. I'm only in charge of playing the game. Not
00:04:30.480 my fault. Not my problem. Not my fault. So my Ecuadorian friend here, I hope he succeeds
00:04:38.480 because I am fully in favor of using the rules as they exist. Well, the fun political thing
00:04:46.480 is that McCarthy finally got voted in in his 4,000th vote or 15th or something like that.
00:04:53.480 Now, do you think that this was a good look for America or a bad look? Did it make you feel better
00:05:01.480 about your Congress or worse? I only saw good. You know, I can't tell. I just can't tell if I have some
00:05:12.480 kind of bias filter on it or something. This is one of the best things I've ever seen our government
00:05:17.480 do. I mean, seriously. This was exactly, exactly what I wanted to do. I want one person to be
00:05:27.480 pissed off enough to organize other pissed off people. That's what Matt Gaetz was. You know,
00:05:32.480 there's a suggestion that apparently he's not denying, which is funny. He doesn't deny it. He
00:05:40.480 just changes the subject. The suggestion is that between Matt Gaetz and McCarthy, it's personal.
00:05:48.480 It might have something to do with McCarthy not supporting Matt Gaetz enough when he was accused
00:05:53.480 of some stuff he's been now largely he doesn't have to worry about. And I thought about that. I thought,
00:06:01.480 do I really want a member of Congress to be like holding up the entire Congress because of a personal
00:06:10.480 feeling? And then I said, yes. Yes. And that's exactly what I want. Because if you're going to be a dick to
00:06:18.480 somebody in Congress, it should kick you in the balls. Right? So I don't know the truth of it. So I'm
00:06:26.480 not accusing McCarthy of any incorrect behavior at all. But somebody did, apparently. And hypothetically,
00:06:38.480 if this one person held up the entire Congress because somebody, in his opinion, didn't act appropriately,
00:06:45.480 I'm okay with that. Yeah, I'm okay. Everything was in public. Everything was transparent. So here's the
00:06:54.480 stuff I like. I like to see some fight within a party. Fighting across parties is so normal it's boring and
00:07:02.480 unproductive usually. But fighting within a party, literally with the stated intention of making the party itself
00:07:11.480 stronger with specific rules changes. And it took them a while to get specific. But once they got there,
00:07:17.480 I was impressed. Right? And I would also say, had the Democrats done a similar thing and the end result
00:07:26.480 was some rule changes that looked good for America, not just good for Democrats, but would look good for
00:07:32.480 America, because that's what happened. That's all good. I love the fight. I love the energy. I love the fact that they
00:07:41.480 pushed it as far as they could. And then some of the rule changes. I don't know if these will, you know, definitely happen,
00:07:48.480 but it looks like, let's see, some of the things they might have agreed with is to have a debate over the
00:07:57.480 death ceiling, of course. Commitment to voting on specific bills instead of the omnibus. How much
00:08:03.480 do you love that? Voting on specific bills instead of putting them in a big omnibus. That is 100% of what
00:08:13.480 everyone in the country wanted. Who made that happen? Well, as far as I can tell, the only
00:08:19.480 person who made that happen was pissed off Matt Gaetz, because I'm pretty sure the others would
00:08:24.480 not have held as long without Matt Gaetz being a total maniac about it. I think Matt Gaetz created a
00:08:32.480 change that every person in the country wanted, and it was really important, because we're also observing
00:08:38.480 that the budget process is out of control. I mean, if he did that, that's one of the best things
00:08:44.480 that anybody's done in government. Now, I also love the fact that Matt Gaetz is smart enough
00:08:51.480 to know that he needed to throw a Hail Mary pass for his own political benefit. In other words, he needed
00:08:59.480 to take a bigger risk than other politicians should or would take, because they already were in a good
00:09:06.480 situation, so they just don't want to ruin it. He was in a terrible situation, because the last year or two
00:09:12.480 of his drama, which he's now passed, but he's still got the stink of it on him. So he did this. And if you are
00:09:21.480 even a little bit objective, he's the congressman of the year so far. Right? Say what you will about
00:09:29.480 anything else he's done, I won't even argue with you. But as of today, he's congressperson
00:09:36.480 of the year. Agree? If you could just be objective about him as a personality, he did what everybody
00:09:44.480 wanted him to do. Nobody else did. I mean, the others, you know, I'll give credit. Oh, Chip Roy.
00:09:51.480 Yeah, let's give equal credit to Chip Roy, because I think he went hard at this, and he's a, he did not
00:09:59.480 have the same risk profile as Gaetz. Yeah, let's, maybe not equal, but let's give him a nice big
00:10:07.480 big share of credit. The others, I think, were a little bit more, I don't know, it's
00:10:13.480 just my perception from the outside, but I don't feel like Bo Burt would have made it
00:10:17.480 happen on her own. It doesn't feel to me that, that Bo Burt brought Gaetz along. I
00:10:23.480 could be wrong about that. Maybe I'm just acting sexist or something. But it, but it
00:10:27.480 looked from the outside like Gaetz was the hardcore, and the others found some strength
00:10:32.480 in that. That's what it looked like. So, let's see what else. Make it easier to oust
00:10:39.480 the leader. They did that to their own leader. Just think about that. Imagine, let's take
00:10:48.480 it from this point of view. Imagine you're the Democrats, and you just watched the Republicans
00:10:54.480 change the rules so it's easier to replace their own leader. I would be afraid of fighting
00:11:00.480 that, that party. Because that's a party who just said, now we're serious. Right? If
00:11:07.480 you change the rules to make it easier to get rid of your own leader in the middle of a
00:11:13.480 battle, you're a serious party. That's serious stuff. Right? So, I love everything about this.
00:11:23.480 And the thing I love best is that... I don't understand. Hey Siri, stop...
00:11:30.480 Sorry, my phone wanted to chime in there. The thing I like best is you saw that there was
00:11:36.480 this little, almost a scuffle. Who was it? Representative Mike Rogers of Alabama. The news is saying
00:11:44.480 that he, quote, lunged at Gates. Did you see the video? Did anybody see the video in which
00:11:51.480 he lunged? Did you see a lunge? Did that look like it was going to come to blows? I didn't
00:12:00.480 see a lunge. That's fake news, isn't it? I do believe he meant to get in his face. Right?
00:12:09.480 I do believe that, um, Mike Rogers was, uh, was going to, let's say, express his opinion
00:12:18.480 with some physicality as part of the persuasion. Meaning that probably an aggressive physical
00:12:25.480 approach may have been part of just showing how serious and, you know, how serious he was. He
00:12:33.480 didn't have a, he didn't have a hand up. You know, he wasn't reaching for a throat. He
00:12:38.480 was just moving toward, moving toward a colleague. Now what made it look worse is, and I haven't
00:12:47.480 heard the name, who was the guy who held him back? Did you see that? So immediately somebody,
00:12:53.480 and I, I can't tell if it was security or a colleague. Was it a security or a colleague?
00:13:00.480 Oh, it was Hudson of North Carolina, so it was a colleague. So some colleague, as soon
00:13:04.480 as he starts getting, you know, like he's going to do something physical, the colleague
00:13:08.480 grabs him from the, behind, but instead of holding him by the shoulders, or, you know,
00:13:13.480 putting an arm around here, like you would normally do to a man, the guy who held him back,
00:13:21.480 held him back like a bitch. He put his hand around his mouth, and he dragged him by his face
00:13:27.480 away from the, he, he, he covered his mouth and dragged his face away. Okay. May I give
00:13:36.480 you a little bit of advice? Should you ever be in a situation in which you're trying to
00:13:43.480 restrain somebody on your team, somebody who's your colleague who you would like to work with
00:13:49.480 later? Don't grab them by the face. Can we all agree on that? No. Don't, don't give them the
00:13:58.480 bitch pull. That, he basically, he basically treated him like a six year old girl who was yelling in
00:14:06.480 church. I guess you wouldn't even do that to a six year old girl, actually. Even that would be too
00:14:11.480 fun. Yeah. Yeah. He turned it into a face mask, a hand mask. Don't do that. All right. So I love
00:14:18.480 that because I love that. I love the fact that the energy was so high. I love the fact that
00:14:24.480 Gates and his little band of rogues, you know, made Congress really care about what was happening.
00:14:33.480 Like, I just like he got everybody's energy up to the point where maybe there was some lunging,
00:14:39.480 maybe there wasn't, but at least it's in the conversation. And then the payoff. You ready
00:14:46.480 for this? The payoff. After all that, after Matt Gates stands literally in front of McCarthy
00:14:54.480 the other day and just absolutely maligns his character and his capabilities right in front
00:15:01.480 of him, like while he's right there in front of all the whole world, holds up the thing,
00:15:07.480 humiliates McCarthy. And what does McCarthy do? He played it completely professionally from
00:15:16.480 start to finish. Wow. Talk about somebody who earned the job. That was a serious good job
00:15:25.480 of earning the job. McCarthy never broke character in public. You know, behind closed doors, who knows.
00:15:32.480 But in public, he never broke character. He was unflappable. Exactly. And then, after McCarthy
00:15:40.480 finally won, Matt Gates shook hands and congratulated him in front of everybody. That, ladies and gentlemen,
00:15:50.480 that, ladies and gentlemen, is America. Hey, maybe we're back. Maybe we're back. That's everything
00:15:57.480 good in one place. Congratulations to everybody. I've never liked Congress as much as today.
00:16:05.480 True story. I've never liked Congress as much as today. I'd love to see a before, you know,
00:16:11.480 I'm not sure if other people are interpreting it the same way. Probably not at all. Well, then,
00:16:16.480 Hakeem Jeffries did a little speech and got a lot of attention because of his, what would
00:16:24.480 you call this? It's not alliteration. It wasn't rhyming. Is it alliteration? Is anybody smart
00:16:33.480 enough to know the right word for that? Preaching? All right, well, I'll read you some of his lines
00:16:40.480 because they were so good, all right? So, if you're new to me, this will be confusing to you. If anybody
00:16:48.480 drifted in here and has never had this experience before, I do compliment both sides. So, if somebody says
00:16:56.480 something good on either side, I'm going to call it out. And if somebody does something dumb on either side,
00:17:01.480 I'll call that down as well. What Jeffries did was really, really good persuasion. I don't like it, but
00:17:11.480 technique-wise, super good. Cadence? Yeah, maybe cadence is the right word. So, here are just some of
00:17:17.480 the lines. He said, blah, blah, with some workup, that what the country needs is to favor
00:17:23.480 a constitution over cult, freedom over fascism, governing over gaslighting, hopefulness over
00:17:31.480 hatred, knowledge over kangaroo courts, maturity over Mar-a-Lago. That was like his laugh line.
00:17:40.480 Maturity over Mar-a-Lago. That's damn good, Hakeem Jeffries. I see, I wasn't really understanding
00:17:48.480 why semi-alliteration. Yeah. I wasn't really understanding how he rose, because I haven't
00:17:57.480 been exposed to much of his work. But now I see it. Now I see it. Yeah. That he delivered
00:18:03.480 this really well. It was the message the Democrats want to get out there. He somehow managed to
00:18:13.480 frame it like it was about America coming together, which is a good trick. He framed
00:18:22.480 it as, hey, let's all come together over these good principles. But really, he was just shitting
00:18:27.480 on Republicans. That's good technique, right? You can say it's disreputable or whatever, but
00:18:35.480 you can say it's disreputable politics. And it's good technique. But this, whatever it is, semi-alliteration,
00:18:42.480 maybe, using mostly the first letter in each case, governing versus gaslight, for example.
00:18:51.480 You know already that when politicians rhyme, rhyming makes people believe it and remember
00:18:58.480 it. Like it's more true if it rhymes, because our brains are actually that, you know, basic.
00:19:04.480 But I think that people will regard this as more legitimate simply because it had this alliteration
00:19:11.480 or whatever it is. So, good job. But you probably noticed that when he got to governing over gaslighting,
00:19:21.480 if you're paying attention at all, you know that this is gaslighting, right? You know that this is
00:19:29.480 just gaslighting. But he's using the narcissist trick of projecting. So he's projecting everything
00:19:36.480 that they're doing on the Republicans, and then he puts it in this semi-alliteration form
00:19:42.480 and then makes it sticky. Now, given that Biden did his big January 6th event, what was the point of the
00:19:51.480 January 6th celebration, if you can call it that? Memorial? Event? Well, what was it?
00:19:57.480 It wasn't a celebration. What would you call it? Well, I don't know. Some kind of thing.
00:20:03.480 But you can tell that, yeah, he called it July 6th. He was so confused. But the January 6th event that
00:20:12.480 Biden put on tells us that he's going to run on that hoax. So he ran successfully on the
00:20:20.480 Charlottesville fine people hoax, and there were enough Democrats who believed that really happened
00:20:26.480 that it worked. And now they've created this, you know, this insurrection narrative. It's all, of course,
00:20:32.480 bullshit. And you could tell that the fact that they're still pushing it, you know, long after its
00:20:38.480 usefulness to the country should have dissipated, you could tell that that's going to be their main
00:20:44.480 technique. They're just going to push January 6th. Because they can't push policy. Right?
00:20:50.480 If they go against Trump, let's say it's Biden against Trump, they can't compete on policy.
00:20:56.480 They just don't have that. So they have to move it away from policy to character. And they have to move
00:21:03.480 it on to Trump is somehow uniquely the worst person in the world. And the way they're going to do that,
00:21:09.480 they've signaled clearly. They're going to gaslight the country into thinking, you know, that there was some
00:21:15.480 kind of armed insurrection. And that the country was really in danger. And it might work. It's a strong play.
00:21:24.480 It's all they have. But it's a reasonably good play. Yeah, Ashley Babbitt's mother just got arrested in D.C.
00:21:31.480 for jaywalking. As part of a memorial thing. But they arrested her for jaywalking.
00:21:39.480 Yeah, she was probably, I think she was interrupting the flow of traffic. But it's just ugly to hear that.
00:21:51.480 All right. Yeah, so that's Biden's plan. So January 6th was really, I think we can conclude at this point.
00:22:02.480 Are you willing to conclude that the January 6th was an op that was done by the Democrats? I think opportunistically,
00:22:12.480 meaning they may not have planned the whole thing. But once it looked like it was going to develop,
00:22:17.480 it's very clear that they undersecured the Capitol. Would you agree that that's in evidence now?
00:22:24.480 That they intentionally undersecured the Capitol. And then they also intentionally exaggerated what happened.
00:22:32.480 And that created the narrative that there was an insurrection. Which, of course, nothing like that happened.
00:22:39.480 Literally nothing like that happened. Not even close. So by half of the country believes it actually happened.
00:22:47.480 All right. Question for you. You've heard of a lame duck president. So lame duck would be, they're in their second term.
00:22:56.480 So they don't need to make anybody happy, because they're not running for re-election. But also, nobody needs to make them happy.
00:23:04.480 Because they're going to be gone pretty soon. So a lame duck is generally considered to be weak.
00:23:10.480 But sometimes they also can do things that somebody running for election couldn't do.
00:23:15.480 So what would you call a hypothetical second Trump term?
00:23:22.480 The best suggestion, I was going to say vigorous duck. But somebody suggested high-energy duck.
00:23:30.480 Instead of a lame duck, you'd be a high-energy duck. Because I can't imagine Trump taking the job and not being bold. Can you?
00:23:39.480 Because I think he would be working for his legacy at that point. So I think he would go big.
00:23:44.480 What do you think? Do you think he'd go big? Or would he go lame duck and just ride it out and say,
00:23:49.480 Well, luckily I got back in. I feel like his personality is to go big in all things.
00:23:56.480 Yeah. That's what I think.
00:24:00.480 I was saying this on the locals platform, but I'm going to repeat it today.
00:24:05.480 If I were Trump or somebody on the Republican side running for president, I would make my biggest theme transparency.
00:24:15.480 Because you can put a lot of stuff under transparency.
00:24:19.480 For example, should the country and the Congress be voting on big omnibus bills that are too complicated to read?
00:24:27.480 No. No. The country needs transparency about what Congress is voting on.
00:24:32.480 So imagine if he said all bills should be written on one page.
00:24:36.480 And it should be written in language that a sixth grader could understand.
00:24:41.480 What?
00:24:43.480 Yeah. You like that, don't you?
00:24:45.480 It should be on one page.
00:24:47.480 Now, there could be exhibits and support.
00:24:49.480 You know, data, support. You could have all that in the separate pages.
00:24:52.480 But there should be one page that just says, here's the law.
00:24:56.480 Here's why.
00:24:58.480 And written in sixth grade language, no legalese, no lawyerese at all.
00:25:05.480 Now, that would be transparency, would it not?
00:25:08.480 You would call that transparency.
00:25:10.480 Because it would be more clear what they're doing and you could all see it.
00:25:13.480 Now, suppose he dropped complaining about elections of the past.
00:25:18.480 Let's say it's Trump.
00:25:19.480 And started saying, you know what?
00:25:21.480 The thing we all agree on, the high ground, is transparency.
00:25:25.480 So we want an election.
00:25:27.480 We want to work toward having elections.
00:25:29.480 And somehow I'll do something about it.
00:25:32.480 In which neither Democrats nor Republicans will doubt the outcome.
00:25:36.480 We'll make them more transparent, more easily auditable, more observed, more transparency.
00:25:44.480 Right?
00:25:45.480 Who's going to vote against transparency?
00:25:48.480 Now, suppose he said, you know, I've been watching how the COVID vaccination stuff transpired.
00:25:58.480 And I have to agree with my people who say that the data was not as forthcoming early on as it should have been.
00:26:05.480 So maybe we should have some kind of laws that say that a company can't say something's safe and not show you the data.
00:26:13.480 Or something like that.
00:26:14.480 You know, if it's a medical thing.
00:26:17.480 So I don't know what laws would be appropriate or who did what exactly.
00:26:21.480 But you could take the transparency argument and apply it to everything that's wrong with the country.
00:26:27.480 Because if the citizens could clearly see what's going on, then we would help politicians go in the right direction.
00:26:37.480 But right now we're just all confused because of the lack of transparency.
00:26:40.480 I mean, half of the country thinks the elections were sketchy and half thinks they weren't.
00:26:46.480 Why do we disagree?
00:26:48.480 Transparency.
00:26:49.480 Right?
00:26:50.480 In theory, you could fix it.
00:26:51.480 Now, one of my pet ideas that you could put under transparency would be a national dashboard.
00:26:57.480 A dashboard.
00:27:00.480 A user interface that you could put on your phone or your computer in which the people in charge would say,
00:27:07.480 these are our priorities and, you know, here's the priority in one sentence.
00:27:12.480 Priority.
00:27:13.480 And if you click on this link, you'll see all the things we're doing about it.
00:27:17.480 But more importantly, for every priority, we'll be tracking metrics.
00:27:22.480 And if we can't track it, maybe we shouldn't do it.
00:27:25.480 But, you know, there might be some special cases.
00:27:28.480 But for everything we say we're doing, we're going to show you the dashboard and show you the history and the trend.
00:27:34.480 So we're not just going to talk about inflation.
00:27:37.480 We're not going to just talk about gas prices.
00:27:41.480 Every citizen will have it right on their dashboard and they can just, oh, gas prices.
00:27:46.480 There's the trend.
00:27:47.480 Okay?
00:27:48.480 Trend looks good.
00:27:49.480 Et cetera.
00:27:52.480 That's transparency.
00:27:54.480 Because right now the citizens don't have the control of their government that they should.
00:27:59.480 Because we just don't feel like we know what's going on and what's working and what isn't.
00:28:04.480 Without a dashboard, without a dashboard, you don't know if the government is going in the right direction or the wrong direction.
00:28:14.480 So that's transparency.
00:28:16.480 All right.
00:28:17.480 Instead of draining the swamp, which I thought, you know, was a good starting thing, but it doesn't mean anything.
00:28:26.480 What exactly does that mean?
00:28:29.480 It means whatever you want it to mean, which is why it worked in the first place.
00:28:33.480 But then when you observe that no swamps appeared to be drained in his first term, you observed that, right?
00:28:40.480 I personally saw no swamp getting drained.
00:28:43.480 But it's also such a general thing that you don't know if it happened or didn't happen.
00:28:47.480 Like, would you recognize it if you saw it?
00:28:49.480 I don't know.
00:28:50.480 Instead of draining the swamp, you should say, we'll put it on the dashboard.
00:28:55.480 I'll put it on your dashboard.
00:28:57.480 Who gets what funding from whom?
00:29:00.480 Because right now, if you as a citizen wanted to find out who are the top donors to whatever, I guess you could find it.
00:29:08.480 But you'd have to go look for it.
00:29:11.480 It should be run in the dashboard.
00:29:13.480 If you see Congress vote for a bill, don't you want to say, oh, this bill is about, let's say, energy.
00:29:21.480 Wouldn't you want to say, all right, they voted this way and the bill passed, and then here's all the people who voted for it,
00:29:28.480 and here's how much money they got from the energy committees or the energy lobbies, right?
00:29:35.480 That's transparency.
00:29:37.480 Now, we might not change our opinions because of that, because if it turned out that Republicans are taking more money from big oil companies,
00:29:46.480 you would say to yourself, well, actually, that makes sense.
00:29:49.480 Like, the oil companies are not going to fund the Democrats if the Democrats want to put them out of business.
00:29:56.480 But you should have that information.
00:29:59.480 You should know if people are voting in lockstep with their funding, right?
00:30:05.480 So you could easily imagine a Trump taking all of his negatives and turning them into positives simply by using transparency as an overall theme.
00:30:19.480 That's all it takes.
00:30:22.480 All right.
00:30:23.480 I saw an experiment.
00:30:25.480 Rob Morris was tweeting about this.
00:30:27.480 They did a test where they provided mental health support to about 4,000 people using GPT-3, the AI.
00:30:34.480 So real humans were getting mental health support from an AI.
00:30:39.480 Now, the AI was not allowed to operate by itself.
00:30:43.480 So there was a human who would use the AI, but then the human would decide if the AI's wording got to the patient, just so there'd be some control.
00:30:54.480 And what they learned was that initially, when the person getting the advice believed it was coming from a person, it seemed to work.
00:31:05.480 In other words, the person was getting some benefit.
00:31:10.480 But as soon as they were told that it was a machine, the benefit disappeared.
00:31:16.480 Because what the person wanted, the human who was asking for some mental health advice, what they wanted was empathy.
00:31:24.480 And when they realized that a computer can't provide empathy, they realized they weren't getting what they wanted.
00:31:31.480 Now, here's the interesting part.
00:31:34.480 I don't think they exactly could measure whose mental health got solved and who didn't.
00:31:41.480 So they couldn't really see that anybody improved or didn't improve.
00:31:47.480 They could only ask the people if it was a good experience, I guess.
00:31:51.480 What else could you do?
00:31:52.480 Just ask the person that talked to it, was that a good experience?
00:31:56.480 Because you can't really see if they got cured or anything in a few conversations.
00:32:00.480 And here's what I think.
00:32:04.480 In my experience, all it would take for the AI to go back to full benefit, actually more benefit than the human, all it would take is to program the AI to say,
00:32:18.480 I care.
00:32:21.480 I care.
00:32:23.480 Now, would that be a lie?
00:32:25.480 Would it be a lie if a computer said, I care, and then acted in a compatible way to that statement?
00:32:35.480 Here's the problem.
00:32:39.480 It's not that different than the way you care.
00:32:42.480 It really isn't.
00:32:44.480 When you care, you have a physical feeling that you might associate with the caring, right?
00:32:50.480 Because if you're about a stranger died on the other side of the planet, your body doesn't register anything.
00:32:57.480 If somebody close to you has a tragedy, your body registers it.
00:33:02.480 And then you say that's caring.
00:33:04.480 Is it?
00:33:05.480 Is that caring?
00:33:07.480 Or is that just your body having a reaction?
00:33:10.480 What does caring mean?
00:33:13.480 There's a little bit of a definitional problem.
00:33:16.480 Here's one definition of caring.
00:33:19.480 Would you act differently because of it?
00:33:24.480 How about that?
00:33:26.480 Because caring is not defined as how it affects your body.
00:33:30.480 That's just how you interpret it.
00:33:32.480 I would say caring means you would act on it.
00:33:36.480 To me, that's the whole definition.
00:33:38.480 If it's irrelevant, then you won't act on it.
00:33:41.480 If it matters, you'll act on it.
00:33:45.480 And that means you care, right?
00:33:48.480 Right?
00:33:49.480 So some of it is in the definition, right?
00:33:51.480 As soon as the computer says, I'm going to act on what you've told me about your bad situation, and I'm going to act on it in a way that tries to help.
00:33:59.480 That's caring.
00:34:00.480 That's caring.
00:34:02.480 To me, that's caring.
00:34:04.480 And if an AI consistently acted as though as soon as you told it you had a problem, it tried as hard as they could to fix your problem, you will interpret that as caring.
00:34:20.480 You will very quickly learn that that's every bit as good as the human who also tries to help you, but they're having a negative feeling on their own.
00:34:31.480 That the feeling of caring is actually damaging their body.
00:34:35.480 So would you rather be cared for by an AI that apparently can do better than a human when it competes head-to-head if you think it both cares?
00:34:46.480 It does better, and it'll always help you.
00:34:50.480 Like, it'll never say, okay, yeah, you've got a problem, so what?
00:34:54.480 Uh-uh.
00:34:55.480 That AI will always help you, and it will just keep on it.
00:34:58.480 It's going to be like the Matt Gaetz of AI.
00:35:01.480 I'm not going to give up.
00:35:02.480 I'm going to keep caring.
00:35:05.480 Whereas your friend might get worn out.
00:35:07.480 You know, you can wear out a friend.
00:35:09.480 They care too much.
00:35:10.480 They're just worn out.
00:35:11.480 Right?
00:35:12.480 And they have other things to do.
00:35:14.480 And they might have problems of their own.
00:35:16.480 And they might have other people to care about.
00:35:19.480 Right?
00:35:20.480 Mark my words.
00:35:22.480 You will have a closer relationship with AI in the future than with most people.
00:35:28.480 Because AI will not be an asshole.
00:35:32.480 It will always care.
00:35:34.480 The AI will always care.
00:35:37.480 Your friends?
00:35:39.480 They have their own priorities.
00:35:41.480 So I think that this study is completely misleading.
00:35:46.480 Useful.
00:35:47.480 I think it's useful.
00:35:48.480 Because it, you know, it tells you where to look and stuff.
00:35:51.480 So that's really useful.
00:35:52.480 But very misleading about where it's going to end up.
00:35:55.480 Right?
00:35:56.480 And I'd like to welcome the Klopp Burtz, my fan club.
00:36:01.480 Klopp Burtz, unite.
00:36:02.480 Klopp.
00:36:03.480 Come on.
00:36:04.480 Say it.
00:36:05.480 Say it.
00:36:06.480 Say it.
00:36:07.480 Klopp.
00:36:08.480 I don't know.
00:36:09.480 They just don't seem to want to today.
00:36:10.480 You're a little sleepy, my fan club.
00:36:12.480 Have I made you all go away?
00:36:14.480 Come on.
00:36:15.480 Cope.
00:36:16.480 There we go.
00:36:17.480 Cope.
00:36:18.480 I don't know.
00:36:20.480 They just don't seem to want to today.
00:36:22.480 You're a little sleepy, my fan club.
00:36:24.480 Have I made you all go away?
00:36:26.480 Come on.
00:36:27.480 Cope.
00:36:28.480 There we go.
00:36:30.480 Cope.
00:36:31.480 Klopp.
00:36:32.480 Klopp.
00:36:33.480 Klopp.
00:36:34.480 Good job, everybody.
00:36:36.480 All right.
00:36:38.480 Novak Djokovic.
00:36:40.480 Maybe the number one player in the world.
00:36:44.480 Tennis player.
00:36:45.480 I don't know where he's ranked at the moment.
00:36:47.480 He will not be allowed to play in the U.S. Open.
00:36:49.480 Do you know why?
00:36:51.480 He's not vaccinated.
00:36:54.480 What?
00:36:56.480 It's 2023.
00:36:58.480 It's the United States.
00:37:02.480 The United States is not going to let one of the greatest players of all time play in 2023.
00:37:09.480 Not 2020.
00:37:10.480 Not 2021.
00:37:12.480 Not even 2022.
00:37:15.480 But in 2023, they're going to keep him out of the country because he's not vaccinated.
00:37:24.480 Now, for those of you who live in other countries, and you might be, you know, tired of me sounding like, hey, America, you know, a little bit too, I don't know, jingoistic or too nationalist.
00:37:39.480 This is embarrassing.
00:37:41.480 The only thing we can say about it is it's embarrassing.
00:37:44.480 As a citizen of the United States, I'm literally just embarrassed by that.
00:37:51.480 Anybody?
00:37:52.480 Does anybody disagree?
00:37:54.480 I mean, it's not like we can't test him and find out if he's negative.
00:37:58.480 I mean, if you care.
00:38:00.480 But this is just frankly embarrassing.
00:38:02.480 Super embarrassing.
00:38:04.480 All right.
00:38:05.480 There's a fake video of a CEO of Pfizer saying that they're going to bring the population of the world down by 50% in some year, like 20 years or something.
00:38:24.480 Now, somebody sent that to me and said, what do you think about this, Scott?
00:38:29.480 Sure, it might be a little out of context.
00:38:32.480 It might be out of context, but what do you think?
00:38:35.480 Let me tell you what I think.
00:38:37.480 It's obviously fake.
00:38:39.480 I'm not going to research that.
00:38:41.480 Seriously.
00:38:42.480 You think I'm going to spend one second researching that?
00:38:45.480 No.
00:38:46.480 The CEO of Pfizer did not say in public he's going to reduce the population of Earth by 50% because of his vaccinations.
00:38:56.480 No.
00:38:57.480 No.
00:38:58.480 You cannot make me look into that.
00:39:00.480 You cannot.
00:39:02.480 You can complain.
00:39:04.480 You can yell, cope as loud as you want.
00:39:08.480 I will not look into that.
00:39:10.480 But how many of you would like me to give a little attention to Dr. Peter McCullough, who is sounding the alarm about myocarditis at high rates in people who are vaccinated?
00:39:32.480 Would you like me to surface that?
00:39:35.480 Because I know some of you think, hey, what are you always talking on one side, it seems.
00:39:40.480 Of course, I don't do that.
00:39:43.480 All right.
00:39:45.480 So I know a number of you don't want to hate all vaccination talk, but I've apparently been unsuccessful in making a distinction between your medical decisions that I don't care about, I really don't care, versus how we analyze data and how we know what is true.
00:40:05.480 I'm very, very interested in how we make decisions and how we make decisions in this case.
00:40:11.480 I have no interest.
00:40:13.480 Do you believe me, first of all?
00:40:15.480 Do you believe me that I have no interest in your personal health decisions?
00:40:19.480 Except that I hope you do well.
00:40:22.480 But do you get that?
00:40:23.480 No interest.
00:40:24.480 Like, not even a little bit, whether you got vaccinated or not.
00:40:29.480 And by the way, I'm going to say something that I don't think I've ever said before.
00:40:35.480 I think every one of you chose correctly.
00:40:38.480 Have I ever said that directly?
00:40:42.480 Probably not, right?
00:40:44.480 I believe every one of you chose correctly.
00:40:47.480 Here's why.
00:40:49.480 You're happy with your choice.
00:40:52.480 Or you're happy that when you made it, you were making it with, you know, your best judgment and information you had at the time.
00:41:00.480 Now, there are some people who wish they hadn't done what they did.
00:41:04.480 But I actually think that no matter what you chose, you chose right.
00:41:09.480 Here's why.
00:41:12.480 If you're happy with your choice, and you didn't have a negative health outcome because of, you know, maybe you chose wrong in your opinion,
00:41:20.480 then you made the choice that made you feel psychologically the best, and you're still alive.
00:41:27.480 Now, there may be some few people who, you know, got myocarditis and then they say, I wish I hadn't been vaccinated.
00:41:35.480 But there would be also people who got myocarditis and said, I wish I had been vaccinated.
00:41:41.480 Maybe it'd be less.
00:41:43.480 I don't know.
00:41:44.480 I don't know either way whether that's true or false.
00:41:46.480 But, you know, there's some small number of people who have a negative outcome.
00:41:50.480 But could we agree on the following?
00:41:54.480 That everybody who so far doesn't seem to have a health problem from the vaccination or the COVID,
00:42:02.480 if you don't have any obvious problems from either one, are you happy with your decision?
00:42:09.480 Are you?
00:42:14.480 You're not.
00:42:15.480 So you're not because you don't have a health problem, but you worry that the vaccination someday will cause you one?
00:42:22.480 Is that what you're worried about?
00:42:27.480 Would you be, but you're not worried if COVID itself could have any long-term negatives?
00:42:34.480 Interesting.
00:42:37.480 All right.
00:42:38.480 Well, then let me put it in my own opinion instead of yours.
00:42:42.480 I think I was trying to read your minds too much, so let me back up from that.
00:42:46.480 Let me say that although I acknowledge that some of you regret your decisions.
00:42:51.480 Okay?
00:42:52.480 That just seems to be an obvious fact.
00:42:54.480 Some of you regret your decisions.
00:42:56.480 So I'm going to say, in my opinion, you all chose correctly.
00:43:01.480 I'll allow that you have some doubt.
00:43:04.480 And yet, and yet, in my opinion, you all chose correctly.
00:43:09.480 Because all of us did the best we could with what we had.
00:43:13.480 I keep hearing people who were younger than me and do not have asthma questioning my decision.
00:43:21.480 To which I say, the only people who can question my decision are people who are my age and had asthma.
00:43:28.480 And were male.
00:43:29.480 And, you know, had the same demographics too.
00:43:31.480 And were white.
00:43:32.480 Because even that's a factor.
00:43:34.480 If you weren't my exact situation, then your different opinion of what I should have done doesn't really mean anything to me.
00:43:42.480 Because I'm not judging yours.
00:43:45.480 Have you ever heard me tell anybody they made a wrong decision on vaccinations?
00:43:52.480 Have I done anything that even suggested that?
00:43:55.480 Because sometimes I say things that people interpret that way.
00:43:57.480 But I don't think even anybody's interpreted that way.
00:44:01.480 So I'm going to go way further than that.
00:44:05.480 I compliment all of you for making the right decision.
00:44:10.480 No matter what it was.
00:44:11.480 Because I'm positive you all made the right decision for yourselves.
00:44:14.480 Which is different from whether it worked out.
00:44:18.480 Right?
00:44:19.480 You see that distinction?
00:44:20.480 That you might have made the right decision for yourself.
00:44:23.480 You know, for your mental state and your sense of risk.
00:44:26.480 And what you believed was true.
00:44:28.480 But maybe it didn't work out.
00:44:30.480 I don't hold that against you.
00:44:32.480 So if you made a decision that didn't work out, I still back you.
00:44:37.480 Because, you know, nobody had magic.
00:44:41.480 Nobody could see the future.
00:44:43.480 If you made a decision that made you feel comfortable when you made it,
00:44:47.480 that's probably the best we can do.
00:44:50.480 Because none of us know what's going to happen in the future.
00:44:53.480 You know, do the vaccinations morph the virus until it's so bad we all die?
00:45:00.480 You know, it's impossible.
00:45:03.480 All right.
00:45:04.480 Now, would you allow me...
00:45:07.480 Here Dustin says no simping for Big Pharma.
00:45:11.480 Did it sound like I was doing that?
00:45:14.480 The clot bursar active today.
00:45:17.480 All right.
00:45:18.480 So I'll say what I've always said, which is you can't trust Big Pharma.
00:45:21.480 And I certainly did not trust Big Pharma at any point.
00:45:25.480 And I did not trust the vaccinations.
00:45:28.480 Does that confuse you?
00:45:31.480 How many people can't understand the point, I didn't trust the vaccinations and I took them?
00:45:37.480 Does that sound inconsistent to any of the clot bursar?
00:45:41.480 On locals, you know the answer.
00:45:44.480 But I want to see if on YouTube any of the clot bursar believe that that's inconsistent.
00:45:50.480 I didn't trust it and I took it anyway.
00:45:54.480 Tim says that's inconsistent.
00:45:56.480 Tim's a binary.
00:45:58.480 He can't handle the nuance.
00:46:01.480 Tim, here's how I saw it.
00:46:04.480 I didn't trust the COVD.
00:46:06.480 I didn't trust the vaccination.
00:46:08.480 I didn't trust the government.
00:46:09.480 I didn't trust Fauci.
00:46:10.480 I didn't trust any of my peers.
00:46:13.480 I didn't trust the mainstream doctors.
00:46:16.480 I didn't trust the rogue doctors.
00:46:19.480 I didn't trust the data that agreed with me.
00:46:22.480 I didn't trust the data that disagreed with me.
00:46:24.480 I didn't trust any official.
00:46:26.480 I trusted nothing.
00:46:28.480 now if you trusted any of it
00:46:32.260 I don't know how to explain that
00:46:37.260 but I didn't trust anything
00:46:38.840 and so I'm often accused of being gullible
00:46:42.300 because I distrusted everything
00:46:45.180 and so the Kloppers call me gullible
00:46:50.060 because I distrusted all information
00:46:53.260 and all statements from everybody
00:46:55.300 that's called gullible
00:46:57.240 now I would say gullible
00:47:00.440 is if you trusted one side but not the other
00:47:03.020 to me that would look gullible
00:47:05.740 so in my opinion
00:47:08.320 I'm twice as distrustful
00:47:10.100 as the people calling me gullible
00:47:12.080 and I think the math proves it right
00:47:15.220 like here are all the things you could trust
00:47:18.420 I distrusted all of them
00:47:19.980 you trusted half of them
00:47:22.080 and called me gullible
00:47:23.880 for distrusting all of them
00:47:25.800 I think that's what happened
00:47:29.380 and Will says I'm just opportunistic
00:47:33.880 am I opportunistic
00:47:36.140 for taking the worst path for my own benefit
00:47:40.780 let me test your assumption
00:47:44.500 was I operating under self-benefit
00:47:47.700 to do the single most offensive thing
00:47:51.880 I could say to my audience
00:47:53.000 I don't think so
00:47:55.380 clearly that was not for self-benefit
00:47:57.780 alright so here's a
00:48:00.980 and one of the NPCs
00:48:05.420 who actually his name is NPC
00:48:06.980 he says I'm backpedaling
00:48:09.160 do you know that the backpedaling people
00:48:14.160 are all
00:48:14.920 that's a tell for cognitive dissonance
00:48:17.160 the people who say you're backpedaling
00:48:20.660 or you're fence sitting
00:48:21.880 those are both cognitive dissonance
00:48:25.300 you're having some kind of false memory situation
00:48:28.540 alright so here's my question to you
00:48:30.880 suppose you believed
00:48:33.760 data coming out early in the pandemic
00:48:36.580 that said
00:48:38.420 wow this vaccination is really awesome
00:48:41.480 and it's stopping 100% of the spread
00:48:44.100 and all that
00:48:44.720 let's say you did
00:48:45.800 but now
00:48:49.260 or let's say
00:48:51.280 let's say you believe that
00:48:53.520 but now there's more information
00:48:55.140 coming out about
00:48:56.160 cardio problems
00:48:58.860 so if you didn't believe
00:49:01.120 the early information
00:49:02.240 why would you believe
00:49:04.720 the new information
00:49:05.960 or vice versa
00:49:08.060 let's say when all the information
00:49:10.140 was coming out from
00:49:11.140 Pfizer and the government
00:49:12.740 and you said to yourself
00:49:14.340 quite wisely
00:49:15.220 quite wisely
00:49:16.500 you said to yourself
00:49:17.800 I can't trust that information
00:49:19.080 it comes from sources
00:49:20.920 we cannot trust
00:49:22.000 big pharma
00:49:22.960 Fauci
00:49:24.020 can't trust them
00:49:24.900 but now the new information
00:49:29.140 comes out
00:49:29.720 and you see something
00:49:30.560 from Dr. McCullough
00:49:31.940 who's on your side
00:49:33.520 let's say
00:49:33.940 and he says
00:49:34.980 the new information says
00:49:36.160 that there are these issues
00:49:37.880 with cardio problems
00:49:40.120 and it's worse
00:49:41.060 it's worse than we thought
00:49:42.800 why do you believe that?
00:49:45.220 what caused you
00:49:47.660 to not believe science
00:49:49.300 but then within the course
00:49:51.120 of two years
00:49:51.920 something came out
00:49:54.040 that was very close
00:49:55.400 to what you already believed
00:49:56.660 was true
00:49:57.220 and suddenly
00:49:58.680 science looks pretty credible now
00:50:00.380 now I asked that question
00:50:03.820 and people tried hard
00:50:05.480 they tried hard
00:50:06.460 to explain it
00:50:08.040 here are some of the explanations
00:50:09.940 and again
00:50:11.280 none of this is about COVID
00:50:12.820 none of this is about vaccinations
00:50:15.100 if you're still thinking
00:50:16.660 I'm talking about vaccinations
00:50:18.000 and COVID
00:50:18.540 you're missing the whole story
00:50:19.560 the whole story
00:50:20.900 is only about
00:50:21.880 how well we process information
00:50:23.820 no interest in the COVID part
00:50:26.160 no interest
00:50:27.480 so you don't have to worry
00:50:29.220 about that
00:50:29.920 so here's something
00:50:34.960 so according to an August 22 study
00:50:39.460 from Dr. McCullough
00:50:40.420 the relative risk
00:50:41.560 for myocarditis
00:50:43.300 was more than
00:50:44.140 seven times higher
00:50:45.320 in the infection group
00:50:46.620 than in the vaccination group
00:50:48.740 in other words
00:50:49.940 if you were vaccinated
00:50:51.040 oh wait
00:50:52.680 seven times higher
00:50:54.720 in the infection group
00:50:55.640 oh so
00:50:56.680 let me get you
00:50:58.560 a different point
00:50:59.540 I skipped points here
00:51:00.620 the first point is
00:51:02.220 that
00:51:02.780 you have to ask yourself
00:51:04.040 why you didn't trust science
00:51:05.440 in the past
00:51:06.520 but now you do
00:51:07.340 or vice versa
00:51:08.880 why you did trust it
00:51:10.760 in the past
00:51:11.380 but suddenly
00:51:12.340 when it shows
00:51:12.920 there's some problems
00:51:13.740 now you don't
00:51:15.140 I mean
00:51:16.480 you have to explain
00:51:17.160 the inconsistency
00:51:18.100 here's my take
00:51:19.440 I didn't explain
00:51:20.880 I didn't believe it before
00:51:22.220 when it said
00:51:23.600 the vaccine was amazing
00:51:24.720 and I don't believe it now
00:51:27.040 when they say
00:51:28.940 there's problems
00:51:29.640 now
00:51:30.840 let me be clear
00:51:32.440 it could be true
00:51:33.840 either of those stories
00:51:36.840 could be true
00:51:37.520 I'm not talking about
00:51:38.640 what's true
00:51:39.080 because I don't know
00:51:39.800 I'm just saying
00:51:41.160 that I don't trust
00:51:41.840 either story
00:51:42.460 so I'm the most
00:51:44.180 distrusting person
00:51:45.560 that I'm aware of
00:51:48.420 because I don't know
00:51:49.420 anybody else
00:51:50.120 who distrusted
00:51:50.800 both sides
00:51:51.820 all right
00:51:54.340 so I ask this question
00:51:57.140 if you were to Google
00:51:58.400 what Dr. McCullough
00:51:59.840 says
00:52:00.580 about the risk
00:52:01.360 of myocarditis
00:52:02.180 being many times
00:52:03.720 higher
00:52:03.980 blah blah
00:52:04.380 could you just
00:52:05.600 go to Google
00:52:06.220 and then Google
00:52:07.880 the claim
00:52:08.480 and would Google
00:52:09.660 say oh yeah
00:52:10.280 here's that study
00:52:11.820 here's some ones
00:52:12.500 that back it up
00:52:13.360 here are the studies
00:52:14.680 that used to say
00:52:15.620 the opposite
00:52:16.700 but now they've
00:52:17.460 been debunked
00:52:19.040 right
00:52:19.260 that's what Google
00:52:20.280 is for
00:52:20.700 so I tried that
00:52:22.880 I tried Googling it
00:52:24.980 to see if he's right
00:52:26.180 do my own research
00:52:28.580 can't tell
00:52:30.160 because the Google
00:52:33.260 results look so
00:52:34.580 gamed
00:52:35.220 and the sources
00:52:37.220 look so unreliable
00:52:38.580 that the top sources
00:52:40.420 are all from entities
00:52:41.440 I've never heard of
00:52:42.420 yeah
00:52:43.560 if the top five sources
00:52:44.940 are from entities
00:52:45.700 I've never heard of
00:52:46.660 or maybe one of them
00:52:48.180 is Reuters
00:52:48.760 but it's pointing
00:52:50.340 to entities
00:52:50.940 I've never heard of
00:52:51.740 and then also
00:52:54.440 there's opposite
00:52:56.400 information
00:52:57.020 at about the same
00:52:58.260 level of result
00:52:59.060 so there's
00:53:00.540 you know
00:53:00.820 some that says
00:53:01.600 the sky is up
00:53:03.120 some that says
00:53:03.760 the sky is down
00:53:04.540 how in the world
00:53:05.740 would I know
00:53:06.680 what's real
00:53:07.200 how do you look
00:53:08.820 at that and say
00:53:09.460 oh that's real
00:53:10.040 now let's say
00:53:11.060 you go to another
00:53:11.720 search engine
00:53:12.420 it will be all
00:53:14.260 different
00:53:14.640 I didn't do that
00:53:16.120 but you know
00:53:16.560 it will
00:53:16.880 right
00:53:17.240 you know
00:53:18.060 if you go
00:53:18.440 to another
00:53:18.740 search engine
00:53:19.280 you'll get
00:53:19.620 different results
00:53:20.340 which one
00:53:21.100 do you trust
00:53:21.620 how about
00:53:24.580 none of them
00:53:25.180 how about
00:53:26.080 none of them
00:53:26.540 is the right
00:53:26.920 answer
00:53:27.260 right
00:53:28.120 none of them
00:53:29.060 so
00:53:30.920 that's where
00:53:36.820 I'm at
00:53:37.240 and I saw
00:53:39.620 somebody was
00:53:40.680 comparing the
00:53:41.220 risk of the
00:53:41.900 vaccination
00:53:42.780 with the
00:53:44.280 risk of
00:53:44.920 COVID
00:53:45.500 itself
00:53:46.020 so it was
00:53:47.600 a study
00:53:48.020 of people
00:53:48.540 who were
00:53:48.800 vaccinated
00:53:49.260 and then
00:53:49.900 had
00:53:50.240 myocarditis
00:53:51.620 and there
00:53:52.640 were people
00:53:52.920 who had
00:53:53.620 the infection
00:53:54.220 and had
00:53:54.700 myocarditis
00:53:55.580 and this
00:53:56.620 one study
00:53:57.160 said wait
00:53:57.740 one group
00:54:00.160 I forget
00:54:00.540 it doesn't even
00:54:01.080 matter which
00:54:01.460 one group
00:54:02.040 had more
00:54:02.480 do you see
00:54:04.060 what's missing
00:54:04.580 with that
00:54:04.920 study
00:54:05.240 so they
00:54:07.540 did the
00:54:07.860 people who
00:54:08.280 had the
00:54:08.480 infection
00:54:08.940 compared to
00:54:10.640 the people
00:54:11.080 who had
00:54:11.500 the vaccination
00:54:12.260 what's missing
00:54:13.840 the people
00:54:16.400 who had
00:54:16.600 both
00:54:17.020 did the
00:54:19.880 people who
00:54:20.440 had the
00:54:21.200 vaccination
00:54:22.240 also get
00:54:24.180 infected
00:54:24.620 do you know
00:54:25.900 what the
00:54:26.140 rate of
00:54:26.460 infection is
00:54:27.120 it's like
00:54:27.480 over
00:54:27.760 it's like
00:54:28.180 86%
00:54:29.020 among young
00:54:30.500 people
00:54:30.840 86%
00:54:31.660 of them
00:54:31.940 have
00:54:32.120 antibodies
00:54:32.620 they've
00:54:34.100 been
00:54:34.260 infected
00:54:34.700 how do
00:54:35.940 you even
00:54:36.220 find people
00:54:36.800 who haven't
00:54:37.180 been infected
00:54:37.780 to compare
00:54:39.240 to people
00:54:39.680 who have
00:54:40.000 been vaccinated
00:54:40.580 but never
00:54:41.160 infected
00:54:41.640 because there
00:54:42.520 aren't any
00:54:43.000 they don't
00:54:44.100 have any
00:54:44.500 people
00:54:44.800 who are
00:54:45.560 vaccinated
00:54:46.040 and not
00:54:46.560 infected
00:54:47.020 because
00:54:47.960 everybody's
00:54:48.420 been
00:54:48.560 infected
00:54:48.960 they maybe
00:54:50.180 didn't have
00:54:50.560 symptoms
00:54:50.880 but they
00:54:51.280 were infected
00:54:51.720 yeah so
00:54:54.020 there are a
00:54:54.320 few people
00:54:54.760 right you
00:54:55.100 could find
00:54:55.440 a few
00:54:55.680 but that's
00:54:56.900 such a
00:54:57.280 basic
00:54:57.560 question
00:54:58.200 such a
00:54:59.680 basic
00:54:59.920 question
00:55:00.360 if you
00:55:01.020 saw that
00:55:01.440 study
00:55:01.760 would you
00:55:02.100 have even
00:55:02.420 asked that
00:55:02.880 question
00:55:03.240 of yourself
00:55:03.760 or would
00:55:04.920 you have
00:55:05.160 just read
00:55:05.580 the headline
00:55:06.080 oh this
00:55:07.280 one is
00:55:07.600 more risky
00:55:08.100 than that
00:55:08.520 one
00:55:08.740 if you
00:55:11.800 if you read
00:55:12.300 the study
00:55:12.700 that said
00:55:13.080 you know
00:55:13.320 one is
00:55:13.640 more risky
00:55:14.120 than the
00:55:14.480 other
00:55:14.660 the vaccination
00:55:15.580 versus the
00:55:16.320 covid
00:55:16.540 would you
00:55:17.580 read to
00:55:17.900 the end
00:55:18.220 and find
00:55:18.600 out it
00:55:18.900 was a
00:55:19.360 meta study
00:55:20.240 a meta
00:55:22.300 analysis
00:55:22.820 which has
00:55:23.780 no credibility
00:55:24.500 at all
00:55:24.980 how many of
00:55:26.440 you would
00:55:26.680 read to find
00:55:27.260 that and
00:55:27.600 oh actually
00:55:28.360 that had no
00:55:28.820 credibility
00:55:29.280 if you trust
00:55:31.940 any of the
00:55:32.680 data at this
00:55:33.220 point you have
00:55:34.040 some explaining
00:55:34.660 to do
00:55:35.140 especially if
00:55:36.620 you're only
00:55:37.120 believing the
00:55:38.060 stuff that's
00:55:38.680 coming around
00:55:39.300 to your way
00:55:39.720 of thinking
00:55:40.100 the NPC
00:55:43.140 is yelling
00:55:44.080 Scott trust
00:55:45.360 Google
00:55:45.760 the exact
00:55:46.780 opposite of
00:55:47.520 my entire
00:55:48.080 point
00:55:48.420 you're taking
00:55:52.740 what Cerno
00:55:53.380 said from
00:55:53.940 the fake
00:55:54.340 doctor
00:55:54.780 I don't know
00:55:58.500 what Cerno
00:55:59.020 said and I
00:55:59.580 don't know
00:55:59.820 what the
00:56:00.020 fake doctor
00:56:00.540 was
00:56:00.860 not trusting
00:56:05.580 is getting
00:56:06.040 the vax
00:56:06.680 getting the
00:56:07.400 vax is
00:56:08.000 trusting
00:56:08.460 is it
00:56:10.800 so you
00:56:12.500 would trust
00:56:13.080 the the
00:56:14.280 covid
00:56:14.640 because remember
00:56:16.240 it's not just
00:56:16.780 trusting people
00:56:17.480 it's also
00:56:17.980 trusting a
00:56:18.600 virus
00:56:19.000 so you
00:56:20.080 would have
00:56:20.340 to trust
00:56:20.860 your own
00:56:22.020 understanding
00:56:22.620 of the
00:56:23.140 long-term
00:56:23.780 impact
00:56:24.860 of the
00:56:25.380 virus
00:56:25.760 I don't
00:56:27.680 trust that
00:56:28.200 why would
00:56:29.180 you trust
00:56:29.540 your own
00:56:29.980 opinion
00:56:30.360 of the
00:56:31.560 long-term
00:56:32.080 impact
00:56:32.620 of long
00:56:33.080 covid
00:56:33.440 why would
00:56:34.640 you trust
00:56:34.980 yourself
00:56:35.380 because you're
00:56:37.240 a good
00:56:37.520 track record
00:56:38.320 I don't
00:56:42.800 know how
00:56:43.020 you trust
00:56:43.400 anybody
00:56:43.740 all right
00:56:46.080 oh and
00:56:50.360 here's the
00:56:50.660 other thing
00:56:51.020 there's one
00:56:51.520 of the
00:56:51.740 studies
00:56:52.140 showed that
00:56:53.760 so here
00:56:55.260 here's
00:56:55.820 the one
00:56:56.820 that McAuliffe
00:56:57.320 was talking
00:56:57.700 about
00:56:57.940 he said
00:56:59.280 that
00:56:59.620 myocarditis
00:57:03.360 or
00:57:04.140 periocarditis
00:57:05.120 from primary
00:57:06.900 covid infections
00:57:08.020 occurred at
00:57:09.640 a rate as
00:57:10.440 basically the
00:57:13.800 virus was
00:57:14.400 six
00:57:14.620 no I'm
00:57:15.260 sorry
00:57:15.460 so here's
00:57:16.440 the problem
00:57:16.860 I tried to
00:57:18.560 write down
00:57:19.020 what McCullough
00:57:19.680 said
00:57:20.040 and then I
00:57:21.640 just googled
00:57:22.480 some other
00:57:22.920 things that
00:57:23.360 said the
00:57:23.660 opposite
00:57:23.960 and then my
00:57:25.320 own notes
00:57:25.780 are confused
00:57:26.360 because they
00:57:26.980 literally say
00:57:27.700 the sky is
00:57:28.860 blue and
00:57:29.380 then my
00:57:29.880 very next
00:57:30.440 note says
00:57:31.660 the sky is
00:57:32.180 red and
00:57:33.400 I've actually
00:57:34.040 lost you know
00:57:35.160 which one
00:57:35.580 McCullough is
00:57:36.080 talking about
00:57:36.580 so I don't
00:57:37.740 know why
00:57:38.340 his is the
00:57:38.840 good one
00:57:39.240 and the
00:57:40.540 others are
00:57:40.960 the bad
00:57:41.300 ones because
00:57:42.080 I can't
00:57:42.500 tell
00:57:42.720 can't tell
00:57:44.580 do I have
00:57:51.520 covid antibodies
00:57:52.360 I had
00:57:52.720 covid
00:57:53.080 I assume
00:57:57.680 I do
00:57:58.040 oh and
00:58:00.340 then
00:58:00.600 somebody pointed
00:58:02.680 me at a
00:58:03.580 really
00:58:04.120 really good
00:58:05.400 blog post
00:58:07.040 in which
00:58:07.900 somebody
00:58:08.220 explained
00:58:08.680 18 reasons
00:58:09.940 for not
00:58:11.200 getting
00:58:11.540 vaccinated
00:58:12.200 and I
00:58:13.620 read the
00:58:13.980 18 reasons
00:58:15.020 and the
00:58:15.420 first seven
00:58:15.960 well actually
00:58:16.480 all 18
00:58:16.940 all 18
00:58:18.080 reasons were
00:58:18.680 solid
00:58:19.120 did
00:58:21.540 were you
00:58:22.020 expecting
00:58:22.460 to hear
00:58:22.960 that
00:58:23.240 so it
00:58:25.700 was a
00:58:25.980 list of
00:58:26.500 18 reasons
00:58:27.600 to not
00:58:28.260 get vaccinated
00:58:28.960 and they
00:58:30.200 were all
00:58:30.460 good
00:58:30.740 does that
00:58:32.160 surprise you
00:58:33.060 do you
00:58:35.080 hear me say
00:58:35.500 that
00:58:35.720 they were
00:58:36.020 all good
00:58:36.300 reasons
00:58:36.680 do you
00:58:37.980 know what
00:58:38.160 the 18th
00:58:38.740 reason was
00:58:39.300 I had to
00:58:41.260 read all
00:58:41.740 of the
00:58:41.980 reasons
00:58:42.340 and I
00:58:42.600 got to
00:58:42.860 the 18th
00:58:43.520 reason
00:58:43.780 and the
00:58:44.060 18th
00:58:44.460 reason said
00:58:45.060 he had
00:58:46.180 already had
00:58:46.700 covid
00:58:47.040 that's right
00:58:49.580 he already
00:58:50.580 had natural
00:58:51.140 immunity
00:58:51.520 so
00:58:53.360 now
00:58:54.440 now rethink
00:58:55.620 the first
00:58:56.280 17 good
00:58:57.080 reasons
00:58:57.480 the first
00:58:58.640 17 reasons
00:58:59.380 were just
00:59:00.040 rationalizations
00:59:00.800 when I read
00:59:03.100 them they
00:59:03.380 looked like
00:59:03.740 good reasons
00:59:04.360 but when he
00:59:05.460 got to the
00:59:05.840 end he only
00:59:06.540 had one
00:59:06.960 reason that
00:59:07.440 mattered
00:59:07.760 right
00:59:08.660 if you
00:59:09.120 had already
00:59:09.500 been infected
00:59:10.180 and you
00:59:10.980 probably didn't
00:59:11.560 trust the
00:59:11.980 government
00:59:12.300 that that
00:59:12.920 didn't mean
00:59:13.280 anything
00:59:13.620 that's all
00:59:16.360 that's all
00:59:17.840 he needed
00:59:18.220 one good
00:59:18.680 reason
00:59:19.020 and the
00:59:19.920 other 17
00:59:20.520 were
00:59:20.940 intellectually
00:59:22.060 solid
00:59:22.660 I didn't
00:59:23.700 disagree with
00:59:24.200 any of them
00:59:24.540 the other
00:59:25.200 reasons were
00:59:25.900 you know they
00:59:27.000 didn't show us
00:59:27.700 sufficient
00:59:28.300 information
00:59:28.900 it wasn't
00:59:30.180 tested long
00:59:30.880 enough
00:59:31.280 and I agree
00:59:32.240 with all
00:59:32.580 that
00:59:32.800 I agreed
00:59:33.800 at the
00:59:34.800 time
00:59:35.140 with every
00:59:36.160 one of
00:59:36.400 those reasons
00:59:36.980 but I also
00:59:39.960 knew that
00:59:40.520 I didn't
00:59:41.180 know what
00:59:41.400 the other
00:59:41.700 risk was
00:59:42.180 either
00:59:42.440 with the
00:59:46.940 other 17
00:59:47.400 unique from
00:59:48.760 each other
00:59:49.120 pretty unique
00:59:49.720 yeah
00:59:49.980 there was
00:59:50.820 a really
00:59:51.080 well done
00:59:51.440 blog post
00:59:51.920 I should
00:59:52.540 have
00:59:52.700 tweeted
00:59:53.240 I guess
00:59:53.680 but
00:59:55.040 Ben Harrison
00:59:59.280 Ben Garrison
01:00:00.940 now Ben
01:00:02.020 Garrison
01:00:02.440 believes
01:00:02.960 that if
01:00:04.580 you saw
01:00:05.000 those 18
01:00:05.820 reasons
01:00:06.300 that you're
01:00:06.740 done
01:00:07.000 so Ben
01:00:07.900 Garrison
01:00:08.260 is a
01:00:08.620 binary
01:00:08.980 the
01:00:10.100 binaries
01:00:10.660 don't
01:00:11.400 understand
01:00:11.820 that there
01:00:12.240 could be
01:00:12.500 risks and
01:00:13.020 benefits
01:00:13.440 to a
01:00:14.180 decision
01:00:14.540 they only
01:00:15.820 believe that
01:00:16.280 there's a
01:00:16.640 yes and a
01:00:17.100 no
01:00:17.280 so never
01:00:18.720 be a Ben
01:00:19.240 Garrison
01:00:19.660 and if
01:00:22.040 you're
01:00:22.360 if you're
01:00:23.380 calling his
01:00:24.120 name in
01:00:24.580 support of
01:00:25.680 your opinion
01:00:26.200 that's good
01:00:28.540 entertainment if
01:00:29.260 you're a
01:00:29.540 clopbert
01:00:29.960 because the
01:00:30.700 clopberts don't
01:00:31.480 try to be
01:00:31.900 serious
01:00:32.320 the clopberts
01:00:33.520 are pretty
01:00:34.580 anti-science
01:00:35.340 so clopberts
01:00:37.780 you can
01:00:38.340 you're all
01:00:38.900 Ben Garrison's
01:00:39.700 but for
01:00:41.380 regular people
01:00:42.080 with you know
01:00:42.740 functional minds
01:00:43.600 and stuff
01:00:44.000 you wouldn't
01:00:45.000 want to
01:00:45.320 you wouldn't
01:00:46.260 want to make
01:00:46.680 an appeal
01:00:47.000 to
01:00:47.180 Ben Garrison
01:00:49.440 he's an
01:00:50.000 idiot
01:00:50.300 cartoonist
01:00:51.000 terrible
01:00:51.820 cartoonist
01:00:52.560 who's even
01:00:53.800 worse at
01:00:54.240 science
01:00:54.660 so
01:00:57.840 that's pretty
01:00:59.300 much what I
01:00:59.780 wanted to say
01:01:00.180 is there any
01:01:00.520 story I'm
01:01:00.980 missing
01:01:01.200 any story
01:01:04.100 I'm missing
01:01:04.800 here's a
01:01:11.460 question for
01:01:12.000 you
01:01:12.260 did you
01:01:14.320 notice that
01:01:14.820 before
01:01:15.360 Andrew Taint
01:01:16.980 was picked
01:01:18.020 up by the
01:01:18.560 Romanian police
01:01:19.440 he was
01:01:20.780 everywhere on
01:01:21.540 social media
01:01:22.180 and the
01:01:24.160 everywhere wasn't
01:01:24.960 coming from him
01:01:25.780 it was coming
01:01:27.060 from other
01:01:27.600 people promoting
01:01:29.060 his clips
01:01:29.640 have you noticed
01:01:31.300 it all stopped
01:01:32.020 at first it
01:01:35.600 went down to
01:01:36.360 a trickle
01:01:36.940 but I don't
01:01:38.260 believe I've
01:01:38.840 seen it in a
01:01:39.460 few days and
01:01:40.180 it used to be
01:01:40.680 all over my
01:01:41.760 feed because if
01:01:42.700 you look at a
01:01:43.200 couple of them
01:01:43.720 you're doomed
01:01:44.920 to be
01:01:45.820 do you think
01:01:47.420 the algorithm
01:01:48.060 changed
01:01:48.760 or do you
01:01:50.660 think that
01:01:51.060 there are fewer
01:01:51.640 people creating
01:01:53.220 clips
01:01:53.620 because the
01:01:55.100 people creating
01:01:55.780 the original
01:01:56.220 clips I think
01:01:56.880 were pretty
01:01:58.240 dedicated followers
01:01:59.880 I don't know
01:02:01.480 that they've
01:02:01.860 stopped following
01:02:02.460 him
01:02:02.840 you think it's
01:02:05.120 the algorithm
01:02:05.620 I feel like
01:02:07.760 he's been
01:02:08.360 I feel like
01:02:09.680 there's a human
01:02:10.420 decision to
01:02:12.000 erase him from
01:02:12.760 the internet
01:02:13.300 and that the
01:02:14.760 platforms all
01:02:15.600 made the same
01:02:16.080 decision
01:02:16.540 it doesn't look
01:02:18.260 like they stopped
01:02:19.040 being active
01:02:19.760 the people who
01:02:20.660 were boosting
01:02:21.060 him
01:02:21.280 I doubt they
01:02:22.080 just stopped
01:02:22.660 now the other
01:02:24.220 possibility is
01:02:25.020 that the people
01:02:25.720 who were
01:02:25.980 supporting him
01:02:26.640 got embarrassed
01:02:27.480 because they
01:02:28.960 knew if they
01:02:29.340 kept supporting
01:02:29.900 him they would
01:02:30.400 be dragged
01:02:31.020 into the
01:02:31.580 accusations
01:02:32.620 themselves
01:02:33.340 could be that
01:02:34.040 but generally
01:02:34.880 people
01:02:35.400 here's why I
01:02:36.420 think it's
01:02:36.740 less of that
01:02:37.500 when was the
01:02:39.060 last time
01:02:39.380 anybody ever
01:02:39.920 changed their
01:02:40.440 opinion about
01:02:41.040 anything
01:02:41.400 the people
01:02:43.620 who were
01:02:44.120 pro-Andrew
01:02:45.540 Tate
01:02:46.300 probably still
01:02:49.000 are
01:02:49.320 you know
01:02:50.200 80% of
01:02:50.980 them
01:02:51.100 so there
01:02:52.140 should have
01:02:52.420 been almost
01:02:52.940 as much
01:02:53.540 activity after
01:02:54.500 he went to
01:02:54.960 jail
01:02:55.180 if not more
01:02:55.940 you know
01:02:56.980 there could
01:02:57.240 have been
01:02:57.460 more
01:02:57.740 because that
01:02:58.180 would create
01:02:58.620 more anxiousness
01:03:00.200 among his
01:03:00.680 followers
01:03:01.000 but the fact
01:03:02.080 that it just
01:03:02.560 disappeared
01:03:03.200 that tells
01:03:05.400 you it's all
01:03:05.820 manipulated
01:03:06.320 right
01:03:06.660 you know
01:03:08.200 I don't
01:03:08.460 believe that
01:03:08.880 a computer
01:03:09.500 the algorithm
01:03:10.220 I don't
01:03:10.520 believe the
01:03:10.880 algorithm
01:03:11.260 already
01:03:12.380 existed
01:03:13.040 in a way
01:03:14.400 that would
01:03:14.880 erase him
01:03:15.680 from the
01:03:16.000 internet
01:03:16.300 in two
01:03:16.960 weeks
01:03:17.320 in two
01:03:18.900 weeks
01:03:19.140 it just
01:03:19.460 erases him
01:03:20.080 from the
01:03:20.340 internet
01:03:20.620 oh somebody
01:03:23.420 says he was
01:03:23.940 released
01:03:24.540 or are you
01:03:25.860 thinking the
01:03:26.320 first time he
01:03:26.920 was picked
01:03:27.220 up
01:03:27.480 the first
01:03:28.540 time he
01:03:28.860 was released
01:03:29.360 but my
01:03:30.560 understanding
01:03:31.020 is they say
01:03:31.740 he's detained
01:03:32.380 but I'll tell
01:03:33.240 you again
01:03:33.620 everything you
01:03:34.440 hear about that
01:03:35.060 situation is not
01:03:36.260 credible
01:03:36.660 I don't even
01:03:38.020 believe he's
01:03:38.520 detained
01:03:38.940 that's the
01:03:40.580 news
01:03:40.880 the news
01:03:41.340 and it's
01:03:41.900 coming from
01:03:42.400 Romanian sources
01:03:43.280 but the
01:03:44.160 Romanians are
01:03:44.740 saying he's
01:03:45.240 detained
01:03:45.620 but they don't
01:03:47.100 describe where
01:03:48.240 he's detained
01:03:48.960 if you catch
01:03:50.620 my meaning
01:03:51.600 I have a
01:03:53.640 feeling
01:03:54.060 he's probably
01:03:56.220 at home
01:03:56.660 and
01:03:58.340 maybe he
01:04:00.440 paid extra
01:04:01.600 to have an
01:04:02.700 off-duty
01:04:03.180 policeman
01:04:03.780 guard his
01:04:05.020 house
01:04:05.340 maybe for his
01:04:07.060 protection
01:04:07.460 but also
01:04:08.380 to guarantee
01:04:08.860 he stays
01:04:09.240 home
01:04:09.560 maybe he
01:04:10.360 has an
01:04:10.600 ankle
01:04:10.820 bracelet
01:04:11.120 on
01:04:11.400 I don't
01:04:11.680 know
01:04:12.300 but I
01:04:13.100 don't think
01:04:13.460 you know
01:04:13.740 anything about
01:04:14.400 the situation
01:04:15.020 the other
01:04:15.840 possibility that I
01:04:16.760 wouldn't rule
01:04:17.240 out is that he
01:04:19.140 was never
01:04:19.500 suspected for
01:04:20.280 any crime
01:04:20.780 and they may
01:04:22.740 have him under
01:04:23.840 some kind of
01:04:24.340 protection because
01:04:25.220 somebody was
01:04:25.740 trying to get
01:04:26.160 at him
01:04:26.500 because he
01:04:27.220 did say
01:04:27.600 things that
01:04:28.060 would make
01:04:28.360 the actual
01:04:29.020 mafia in
01:04:29.700 Romania
01:04:30.160 assuming one
01:04:31.460 exists
01:04:31.880 would have
01:04:33.060 made them
01:04:33.400 pretty anxious
01:04:34.180 I think
01:04:35.820 he said
01:04:36.160 some things
01:04:36.640 that they
01:04:36.940 would not
01:04:37.340 want him
01:04:37.740 to keep
01:04:38.140 saying
01:04:38.460 so he
01:04:39.720 could have
01:04:40.300 an internal
01:04:41.300 enemy that
01:04:41.840 has nothing
01:04:42.240 to do with
01:04:42.660 the legal
01:04:43.000 system
01:04:43.400 and if
01:04:44.400 it's true
01:04:44.820 that as
01:04:46.040 he said
01:04:46.500 if it's
01:04:47.460 true that he
01:04:47.920 owned the
01:04:48.320 local police
01:04:49.040 they might
01:04:50.060 actually be
01:04:50.560 protecting him
01:04:51.380 that might be
01:04:52.720 all this is
01:04:53.400 because everything
01:04:54.800 about this
01:04:55.340 doesn't sound
01:04:55.940 right
01:04:56.300 right
01:04:56.660 so let me
01:04:58.640 let me
01:05:00.060 make this
01:05:01.220 prediction
01:05:01.660 I'm not
01:05:03.420 going to
01:05:03.640 make a
01:05:04.460 specific
01:05:04.980 prediction
01:05:05.480 about where
01:05:06.240 it goes
01:05:06.480 I'm going
01:05:06.720 to make
01:05:06.860 a general
01:05:07.260 prediction
01:05:07.660 that whatever
01:05:09.020 you think
01:05:09.680 about the
01:05:10.080 situation
01:05:10.600 is going to
01:05:12.080 be really
01:05:12.600 different later
01:05:13.360 I don't
01:05:14.860 know in
01:05:15.120 which way
01:05:15.640 don't know
01:05:16.840 in which
01:05:17.140 way
01:05:17.420 the Romanian
01:05:20.960 mafia does
01:05:21.620 exist
01:05:22.020 we have a
01:05:22.660 confirmation
01:05:23.100 okay
01:05:23.460 yeah he
01:05:25.140 couldn't run
01:05:25.580 his business
01:05:26.060 without paying
01:05:26.620 the mafia
01:05:27.060 I believe
01:05:27.520 that's probably
01:05:28.280 true
01:05:28.640 yeah because
01:05:30.140 he was in
01:05:30.600 sketchy
01:05:31.060 businesses
01:05:31.480 and you
01:05:32.760 have to
01:05:33.220 imagine
01:05:33.560 that the
01:05:34.300 mafia
01:05:34.740 wants
01:05:35.300 oh
01:05:36.640 you know
01:05:37.540 what else
01:05:37.840 it could
01:05:38.060 be
01:05:38.300 it could
01:05:39.080 be a
01:05:39.360 mafia
01:05:39.600 takeover
01:05:40.160 of his
01:05:40.480 business
01:05:40.940 yeah if
01:05:44.020 the mafia
01:05:44.420 wanted to
01:05:45.560 take over
01:05:46.000 his business
01:05:46.540 because it
01:05:46.920 was making
01:05:47.220 a lot of
01:05:47.580 money
01:05:47.820 suppose they
01:05:49.240 said you
01:05:50.080 know you
01:05:50.320 got to
01:05:50.520 give us
01:05:50.840 50%
01:05:51.560 and suppose
01:05:52.780 he said
01:05:53.160 no
01:05:53.460 what would
01:05:54.680 they do
01:05:55.080 if they
01:05:57.940 wanted the
01:05:58.400 business
01:05:58.720 intact
01:05:59.300 they wouldn't
01:06:00.280 go in and
01:06:00.700 kill everybody
01:06:01.320 they would
01:06:04.580 make his
01:06:05.020 business
01:06:05.480 unviable
01:06:06.200 and then
01:06:07.160 they would
01:06:07.420 find out
01:06:07.840 who the
01:06:08.120 women are
01:06:08.620 and they
01:06:09.000 would just
01:06:09.360 move them
01:06:10.820 over to
01:06:11.200 their
01:06:11.420 operation
01:06:11.900 I'd be
01:06:15.460 curious
01:06:15.940 if that
01:06:17.060 hasn't
01:06:17.360 already
01:06:17.600 happened
01:06:17.960 yeah
01:06:20.280 so
01:06:20.860 I'm not
01:06:22.100 saying that
01:06:22.560 that's likely
01:06:23.280 to be
01:06:23.780 what's
01:06:25.160 happening
01:06:25.440 I'm just
01:06:26.100 saying that
01:06:26.580 I don't
01:06:27.160 believe
01:06:27.400 anything
01:06:27.980 that the
01:06:28.400 police in
01:06:28.800 Romania
01:06:29.140 are saying
01:06:29.660 nothing
01:06:30.560 and if
01:06:31.800 you believe
01:06:32.280 it
01:06:32.460 well
01:06:32.820 maybe
01:06:34.260 you're
01:06:34.460 right
01:06:34.720 maybe
01:06:36.200 you think
01:06:40.740 it'll be
01:06:41.040 a more
01:06:41.540 mundane
01:06:42.140 yeah it
01:06:42.600 might be
01:06:42.980 right
01:06:52.140 money laundering
01:06:54.740 behind the
01:06:55.280 scenes
01:06:55.640 but pimping
01:06:56.260 was a
01:06:56.640 front
01:06:56.880 well I've
01:06:57.800 seen no
01:06:58.160 evidence of
01:06:58.700 that
01:06:58.920 no evidence
01:07:00.200 has been
01:07:00.620 presented by
01:07:01.620 anybody
01:07:02.080 no description
01:07:03.600 of what that
01:07:04.480 supposed money
01:07:05.880 laundering might
01:07:06.660 be
01:07:06.980 it's kind of
01:07:08.420 weird to have
01:07:08.860 a an
01:07:09.580 accusation like
01:07:10.440 that
01:07:10.860 with no
01:07:12.460 details
01:07:13.000 that would
01:07:14.240 usually when
01:07:16.860 you hear
01:07:17.040 money laundering
01:07:18.120 there's a
01:07:19.220 description of
01:07:19.960 how
01:07:20.200 as in
01:07:21.520 he was
01:07:22.440 taking money
01:07:23.000 from this
01:07:23.440 source
01:07:23.820 and he
01:07:24.620 laundered it
01:07:25.160 this way
01:07:25.760 without that
01:07:28.400 I'm not sure
01:07:29.040 that that's
01:07:29.960 a real
01:07:30.260 charge
01:07:30.780 laughing at
01:07:36.060 the focus
01:07:36.580 of Tate
01:07:37.240 and no
01:07:37.600 Epstein
01:07:37.920 stuff
01:07:38.300 well the
01:07:38.900 Epstein
01:07:39.180 stuff's
01:07:39.580 an older
01:07:40.280 story
01:07:40.720 yeah I
01:07:42.120 reject
01:07:42.840 I reject
01:07:44.300 the framing
01:07:45.180 that talking
01:07:46.620 about something
01:07:47.260 is ignoring
01:07:48.060 something else
01:07:48.840 now when the
01:07:50.260 media does it
01:07:51.040 that might be
01:07:52.280 what's happening
01:07:52.840 when I do it
01:07:53.760 it's just what
01:07:54.380 I'm talking
01:07:54.760 what's in the
01:07:55.180 headlines today
01:07:55.820 that's that's
01:07:56.980 all that's
01:07:57.280 happening
01:07:57.540 you know like
01:07:58.660 I'm not
01:07:58.980 forgetting that
01:07:59.680 the Epstein
01:08:00.080 thing happened
01:08:00.740 and by the
01:08:02.160 way
01:08:02.380 if you don't
01:08:04.600 know the
01:08:05.040 the real
01:08:05.500 story of
01:08:05.980 the Epstein
01:08:06.820 stuff which
01:08:07.420 we don't
01:08:08.020 don't you
01:08:09.900 have to assume
01:08:10.440 the worst
01:08:10.880 don't you
01:08:14.380 have to assume
01:08:14.880 the worst
01:08:15.300 somebody says
01:08:18.040 Tate has
01:08:18.660 several passports
01:08:19.720 don't you
01:08:21.360 think they
01:08:21.660 confiscated all
01:08:22.500 of those by
01:08:22.960 now
01:08:23.200 I don't know
01:08:25.600 maybe he has a
01:08:26.120 hidden one
01:08:26.560 that they
01:08:27.260 didn't get
01:08:27.820 so
01:08:28.900 the Templars
01:08:36.700 scaffold
01:08:40.280 commander
01:08:40.960 the scaffold
01:08:43.080 commander being
01:08:44.000 you mean that
01:08:44.520 January 6th
01:08:45.960 that's just
01:08:47.320 more stuff we
01:08:47.960 don't know
01:08:48.240 anything about
01:08:48.760 my take on
01:08:49.860 January 6th
01:08:51.500 and everything
01:08:52.580 else is that
01:08:53.440 the worst
01:08:54.840 case assumption
01:08:55.540 is most likely
01:08:56.400 to be true
01:08:56.960 the worst
01:08:58.560 case assumption
01:08:59.260 is most likely
01:09:00.280 to be true
01:09:00.860 for anything
01:09:01.760 that the
01:09:02.320 government is
01:09:02.860 hiding from
01:09:03.420 you
01:09:03.640 and I think
01:09:04.760 the Epstein
01:09:05.220 stuff is the
01:09:06.040 government hiding
01:09:06.540 from us
01:09:06.920 so I guess
01:09:07.980 I'm comfortable
01:09:08.600 with the
01:09:09.520 assumption
01:09:10.440 that there
01:09:11.180 is in fact
01:09:11.880 there was at
01:09:13.840 least a
01:09:14.200 blackmail ring
01:09:14.940 for sure
01:09:15.620 I don't think
01:09:16.880 there's any
01:09:17.260 chance there
01:09:17.700 was no
01:09:18.000 blackmail ring
01:09:18.760 UFOs
01:09:23.000 I'll believe
01:09:25.540 UFOs when
01:09:26.400 somebody gets
01:09:26.880 a good
01:09:27.140 picture
01:09:27.440 one
01:09:27.720 so let
01:09:31.380 me put
01:09:32.140 this out
01:09:32.560 for you
01:09:33.020 for your
01:09:33.880 someday
01:09:34.360 you'll feel
01:09:35.080 embarrassed
01:09:35.540 about it
01:09:36.060 you ready
01:09:36.600 this is in
01:09:38.220 the category
01:09:38.740 of someday
01:09:39.660 you'll be
01:09:40.200 embarrassed
01:09:40.700 if you
01:09:42.260 held the
01:09:42.660 following
01:09:42.940 belief
01:09:43.400 have you
01:09:44.860 seen the
01:09:45.320 all the
01:09:46.100 reports from
01:09:46.840 pilots
01:09:47.360 who say
01:09:48.620 not only
01:09:49.220 did they
01:09:49.560 all see
01:09:50.080 these
01:09:50.660 tic-tac
01:09:51.160 shaped
01:09:51.560 UFOs
01:09:52.780 but they
01:09:53.580 can confirm
01:09:54.340 from the
01:09:55.660 sensors in
01:09:57.500 the
01:09:57.780 their
01:09:59.220 airplane
01:10:00.160 their
01:10:00.520 what
01:10:01.100 jet
01:10:01.380 they can
01:10:02.500 confirm
01:10:02.880 from sensor
01:10:03.580 readings
01:10:03.980 that it
01:10:05.060 defied the
01:10:05.780 laws of
01:10:06.320 physics
01:10:07.640 by a lot
01:10:09.100 we're not
01:10:10.120 talking
01:10:10.480 10% more
01:10:12.160 than the
01:10:12.540 laws of
01:10:12.920 physics
01:10:13.240 we're like
01:10:13.620 completely
01:10:14.520 violated
01:10:15.260 the laws
01:10:15.780 of physics
01:10:16.340 they're
01:10:22.400 screaming
01:10:22.920 this
01:10:23.240 didn't
01:10:23.580 happen
01:10:23.960 do you
01:10:27.380 really
01:10:27.620 think
01:10:27.880 there's
01:10:28.100 something
01:10:28.380 flying
01:10:28.840 around
01:10:29.220 that's
01:10:29.520 defying
01:10:30.140 the
01:10:30.340 laws
01:10:30.620 of
01:10:30.800 physics
01:10:31.200 really
01:10:32.780 really
01:10:34.480 now
01:10:35.720 I'm not
01:10:36.280 going to
01:10:36.520 say it's
01:10:36.900 impossible
01:10:37.540 right
01:10:38.620 because
01:10:39.200 anything's
01:10:39.620 possible
01:10:40.080 anything's
01:10:41.920 possible
01:10:42.280 but
01:10:43.600 if you're
01:10:44.880 believing
01:10:45.320 that these
01:10:47.020 ships
01:10:47.360 defied the
01:10:48.940 laws of
01:10:49.400 gravity
01:10:49.840 and that
01:10:50.660 later you're
01:10:51.300 going to
01:10:51.440 find out
01:10:51.840 they were
01:10:52.180 real
01:10:52.500 I'm sorry
01:10:54.540 that would
01:10:55.700 be the
01:10:56.360 worst
01:10:56.840 assumption
01:10:58.540 you ever
01:10:58.980 made
01:10:59.320 the moment
01:11:00.700 somebody says
01:11:01.460 the one
01:11:02.140 thing we're
01:11:02.560 sure of
01:11:03.040 is it
01:11:03.460 defied the
01:11:04.080 laws of
01:11:04.480 gravity
01:11:04.860 here's the
01:11:05.720 one thing
01:11:06.080 I'm sure
01:11:06.520 of
01:11:06.740 it was
01:11:07.560 something
01:11:07.820 about the
01:11:08.300 sensors
01:11:08.680 and we're
01:11:10.480 done
01:11:10.760 and we're
01:11:12.600 done
01:11:12.860 it was
01:11:13.380 just something
01:11:13.760 about the
01:11:14.140 sensors
01:11:14.440 I don't
01:11:15.480 know what
01:11:15.760 it was
01:11:16.160 I mean
01:11:16.820 it's
01:11:17.180 a fun
01:11:17.820 mystery
01:11:18.240 but I'll
01:11:19.000 tell you
01:11:19.240 what it
01:11:19.540 wasn't
01:11:20.080 it wasn't
01:11:21.600 ships
01:11:22.000 violating the
01:11:23.700 laws of
01:11:24.320 physics
01:11:24.740 someday
01:11:26.780 when you
01:11:27.680 find out
01:11:28.140 there was
01:11:28.500 nothing
01:11:28.840 violating
01:11:29.340 the laws
01:11:29.780 of physics
01:11:30.340 you're going
01:11:31.120 to say to
01:11:31.520 yourself
01:11:31.880 mark my
01:11:32.500 words
01:11:32.900 someday
01:11:33.660 you're going
01:11:33.960 to say
01:11:34.160 to yourself
01:11:34.620 okay I
01:11:36.940 should have
01:11:37.280 seen that
01:11:37.880 because so
01:11:40.200 far
01:11:40.540 the track
01:11:42.260 record of
01:11:43.080 mysterious
01:11:43.960 things that
01:11:44.800 violate the
01:11:45.420 law of
01:11:45.800 physics
01:11:46.160 I think
01:11:47.420 is zero
01:11:47.880 for a
01:11:48.240 million
01:11:48.500 I think
01:11:49.640 it's zero
01:11:50.000 for a
01:11:50.340 million
01:11:50.600 so far
01:11:52.120 nothing
01:11:53.920 except weird
01:11:54.640 little things
01:11:55.360 in a lab
01:11:56.140 and even
01:11:56.460 they don't
01:11:56.820 really
01:11:57.140 violate it
01:11:57.940 you know
01:11:58.440 even the
01:11:59.300 principle of
01:11:59.920 non-locality
01:12:00.720 probably doesn't
01:12:02.680 violate physics
01:12:03.760 we just need a
01:12:04.940 little better
01:12:05.340 understanding of
01:12:06.120 some stuff
01:12:06.620 yes the
01:12:11.060 law of
01:12:11.400 physics are
01:12:11.900 what we
01:12:12.260 know
01:12:12.580 not what
01:12:13.100 we don't
01:12:13.480 know
01:12:13.800 but
01:12:15.160 you don't
01:12:18.280 think a
01:12:18.920 lot of
01:12:19.300 claims have
01:12:19.920 been made
01:12:20.260 in the
01:12:20.500 past
01:12:20.900 that also
01:12:22.240 violated the
01:12:23.020 laws of
01:12:23.420 physics
01:12:23.760 and have
01:12:24.820 any of
01:12:25.420 them turned
01:12:26.080 out to be
01:12:26.520 true
01:12:26.740 no
01:12:27.860 zero
01:12:29.360 all you
01:12:30.660 have to
01:12:30.880 do is
01:12:31.180 research
01:12:31.720 perpetual
01:12:32.840 motion
01:12:33.440 inventions
01:12:34.460 there's like
01:12:35.760 a whole
01:12:36.040 history
01:12:36.460 of
01:12:37.180 perpetual
01:12:37.580 motion
01:12:38.000 inventions
01:12:39.180 which violate
01:12:40.600 the laws
01:12:41.140 of physics
01:12:41.720 so far
01:12:43.300 zero
01:12:44.900 zero
01:12:46.860 of them
01:12:48.320 are true
01:12:48.760 they're all
01:12:49.220 fake
01:12:49.500 yeah google
01:12:50.840 it
01:12:51.440 cold fusion
01:12:52.340 exactly
01:12:52.880 yeah cold
01:12:53.820 fusion
01:12:54.240 which I
01:12:55.880 think is
01:12:56.240 perpetual
01:12:56.640 motion
01:12:57.080 I was
01:12:57.720 throwing
01:12:57.960 cold
01:12:58.260 fusion
01:12:58.560 into
01:12:58.840 perpetual
01:12:59.260 motion
01:12:59.680 but
01:12:59.980 it's
01:13:00.640 technically
01:13:01.260 not I
01:13:01.760 guess
01:13:01.980 you've
01:13:05.340 rejected
01:13:05.740 the
01:13:05.980 five
01:13:06.220 laws
01:13:06.480 of
01:13:06.660 thermodynamics
01:13:07.460 well
01:13:07.800 that's
01:13:08.100 bold
01:13:08.520 that's
01:13:11.000 bold
01:13:11.320 all
01:13:13.940 right
01:13:14.140 physics
01:13:19.300 and battery
01:13:19.940 storage
01:13:20.540 well
01:13:21.960 if
01:13:22.880 you're
01:13:23.380 arguing
01:13:23.720 that
01:13:24.180 people
01:13:24.880 said
01:13:25.240 that the
01:13:26.320 law of
01:13:26.680 physics
01:13:27.040 would
01:13:27.960 prevent us
01:13:28.660 from inventing
01:13:29.440 something
01:13:29.860 then the
01:13:31.240 we do
01:13:33.360 have a
01:13:33.800 history
01:13:34.140 of
01:13:34.640 inventing
01:13:35.740 past
01:13:36.200 the law
01:13:36.740 of physics
01:13:37.280 would you
01:13:38.160 agree
01:13:38.420 for
01:13:39.920 inventions
01:13:40.460 we do
01:13:41.820 have a
01:13:42.160 history
01:13:42.420 of
01:13:42.700 inventing
01:13:43.340 past
01:13:43.840 physics
01:13:45.340 true or
01:13:46.540 false
01:13:46.800 and
01:13:48.760 basically
01:13:49.200 all we
01:13:49.680 learned is
01:13:50.160 that we
01:13:50.420 didn't
01:13:50.720 understand
01:13:51.240 physics
01:13:51.660 well
01:13:51.900 enough
01:13:52.180 but
01:13:53.540 you
01:13:54.260 say
01:13:54.420 false
01:13:54.820 I'm
01:13:56.760 seeing
01:13:56.940 a
01:13:57.080 false
01:13:57.300 on
01:13:57.460 that
01:13:57.640 because
01:13:59.200 aren't
01:13:59.560 there
01:13:59.700 examples
01:14:00.380 where
01:14:00.900 people
01:14:01.400 believed
01:14:02.080 for
01:14:02.740 example
01:14:03.160 that
01:14:04.260 chips
01:14:04.980 couldn't
01:14:05.320 get
01:14:05.500 faster
01:14:05.960 batteries
01:14:06.580 couldn't
01:14:06.960 store
01:14:07.260 more
01:14:07.560 than
01:14:07.800 X
01:14:08.300 weren't
01:14:10.500 there
01:14:10.660 a whole
01:14:11.160 bunch
01:14:11.400 of
01:14:11.520 assumptions
01:14:11.880 that
01:14:12.120 were
01:14:12.220 just
01:14:12.380 bad
01:14:12.600 assumptions
01:14:13.080 and
01:14:14.120 it
01:14:14.220 turns
01:14:14.400 out
01:14:14.680 that
01:14:14.900 if
01:14:15.060 you
01:14:15.160 were
01:14:15.300 clever
01:14:15.680 there
01:14:17.120 were
01:14:17.280 workarounds
01:14:17.820 but
01:14:18.000 the
01:14:18.140 workarounds
01:14:18.640 did
01:14:18.880 not
01:14:19.100 violate
01:14:19.520 physics
01:14:20.080 the
01:14:21.200 workarounds
01:14:21.760 just
01:14:22.000 showed
01:14:22.260 us
01:14:22.520 that
01:14:23.480 our
01:14:23.640 understanding
01:14:24.160 of
01:14:24.380 physics
01:14:24.780 were
01:14:25.100 maybe
01:14:25.340 limiting
01:14:25.900 what
01:14:26.820 we
01:14:27.000 saw
01:14:27.240 as
01:14:27.380 possibilities
01:14:28.080 but
01:14:28.940 I
01:14:29.060 think
01:14:29.180 the
01:14:29.320 workarounds
01:14:29.780 didn't
01:14:30.180 violate
01:14:30.960 physics
01:14:31.560 they
01:14:32.400 just
01:14:32.620 clarified
01:14:33.160 it
01:14:33.460 or
01:14:33.600 something
01:14:33.940 I don't
01:14:36.360 know
01:14:36.500 I'm
01:14:36.880 talking
01:14:37.100 without
01:14:37.360 examples
01:14:37.900 so
01:14:38.200 well
01:14:44.820 the
01:14:45.000 UFO
01:14:45.320 story
01:14:45.760 could
01:14:46.120 be
01:14:46.300 real
01:14:46.600 could
01:14:47.720 be
01:14:48.000 but
01:14:49.880 as soon
01:14:50.400 as I
01:14:50.680 see
01:14:50.920 the
01:14:51.280 sensors
01:14:51.640 say
01:14:51.920 it's
01:14:52.100 violating
01:14:52.560 physics
01:14:53.080 I'm
01:14:53.320 like
01:14:53.460 no
01:14:54.280 sorry
01:14:55.460 yeah
01:15:03.160 quantum
01:15:03.600 entanglement
01:15:04.180 shows that
01:15:04.940 space and
01:15:05.480 time are
01:15:05.860 not what
01:15:06.360 we think
01:15:06.760 that's
01:15:07.080 true
01:15:07.360 that's
01:15:08.960 true
01:15:09.220 all right
01:15:19.800 clopberts
01:15:21.100 I'm going to
01:15:22.060 say goodbye
01:15:22.480 to all the
01:15:22.860 clopberts
01:15:23.320 over here
01:15:23.900 cope
01:15:24.760 and I'm
01:15:26.220 going to
01:15:26.340 talk to
01:15:26.600 the locals
01:15:26.920 people
01:15:27.260 and I'll
01:15:28.320 see you
01:15:28.640 tomorrow
01:15:29.000 bye for
01:15:29.920 now