Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1987 Scott Adams： Joe Biden's Garage, And The Government Lying To You About Everything

00:00:00.240 It's Friday the 13th, and YouTube, they tried to stop me, the gremlins of bad luck, but here I am.

00:00:12.120 Yeah, here I am. And you've managed to make it here for the highlight of civilization,

00:00:19.420 the best thing that's ever happened to you in your whole damn life.

00:00:22.860 And if you'd like to take it up a notch, and I think we all need that because it's Friday the 13th,

00:00:27.400 which I will reframe in a moment, all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a stein,

00:00:34.100 a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind, fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.

00:00:40.520 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine of the day.

00:00:44.040 The thing makes everything better, including Friday the 13th. It happens now. Go.

00:00:54.300 Yeah, that's some good stuff.

00:00:57.400 All right, watch me reframe Friday the 13th from what some of you think would be bad luck

00:01:03.320 into something better. Are you ready?

00:01:08.800 How many things happened this year that were just the way you expected them?

00:01:14.180 Not very many.

00:01:16.900 It's like opposite world.

00:01:18.340 We just spent years of investigating Trump for potential corruption with foreign countries.

00:01:26.720 What did we find?

00:01:28.820 We found that Joe Biden was corrupt with foreign countries.

00:01:33.560 How many times have we been told one thing is true, only to learn that the opposite is true?

00:01:41.780 How about those vaccinations that are totally stopping the spread of the virus?

00:01:48.700 Pretty much the opposite of a vaccination, isn't it?

00:01:51.960 As in, it doesn't stop it at all.

00:01:54.680 So why would Friday the 13th be the only thing this year that happened just the way it was presented?

00:02:03.980 No, it's probably opposite.

00:02:07.360 Probably the luckiest day of the year.

00:02:09.320 I have a prediction that some of you are going to have the best day you've ever had in your whole life.

00:02:14.240 Because nothing is what it seems.

00:02:16.980 Everything is maybe opposite.

00:02:20.440 Except for the good news.

00:02:22.000 Good news is always exactly what it seems.

00:02:25.200 Remember, reframes don't need to make sense.

00:02:27.860 If there's one thing I can teach you, a reframe doesn't have to make logical sense.

00:02:34.800 It just has to, the words just have to make sense in a sentence.

00:02:38.240 And that's good enough to reprogram your brain.

00:02:40.820 So that's the hypnotist in me teaching you that.

00:02:44.680 All right.

00:02:45.220 Lots of fun stories.

00:02:47.420 But I'd like to start with an inspirational quote from Kamala Harris.

00:02:54.100 And she did a little public speaking.

00:02:55.720 It's always a mistake.

00:02:57.860 But here's an exact quote from Kamala Harris.

00:03:01.800 I think of this moment as a moment that is about great moment, um.

00:03:09.740 Inspired by, yes, optimism.

00:03:13.460 But also inspired by, also, our collective effort to see what can be unburdened by what has been.

00:03:23.160 I didn't make that up.

00:03:29.040 That's a direct quote.

00:03:31.620 From your next president.

00:03:34.260 Maybe.

00:03:36.400 All right.

00:03:37.480 Here's some good news that I'd like to report.

00:03:39.800 How many of you have heard me bitching about how sports are all broken?

00:03:44.960 And they're broken because the sports were invented a hundred years ago.

00:03:49.500 And then we act like nothing changed.

00:03:52.320 So we don't have to change the rules.

00:03:54.820 Like tennis, for example, was completely destroyed by the quality of the equipment improving.

00:04:01.180 So you can hit a tennis ball so quickly that you can guarantee that the other person won't enjoy playing.

00:04:08.800 Guarantee.

00:04:10.160 I can make the other person totally not enjoy their day.

00:04:13.460 Oh, I can enjoy it.

00:04:14.920 Because it's fun to hit really hard.

00:04:17.560 So if it goes out, if it goes in, I feel good.

00:04:20.620 But I can make sure you don't enjoy it just by hitting the hell out of that ball.

00:04:25.160 So it turns out that somebody fixed sports.

00:04:30.300 At least once.

00:04:32.100 And here's how they did it.

00:04:33.100 They invented a new sport and they got rid of all the stupid stuff that ruined sports.

00:04:41.020 It's called pickleball.

00:04:44.200 And I was trying to understand why everybody was asking me, like everywhere,

00:04:49.980 have you played pickleball?

00:04:51.260 Have you played pickleball?

00:04:52.440 Have you played pickleball?

00:04:54.180 And I hadn't until yesterday.

00:04:57.480 So yesterday, you know, I have a tennis court.

00:05:00.340 So you can use, roughly you can use a tennis court.

00:05:02.800 Or you just mark out a smaller size.

00:05:06.020 And so I, you know, I just hit the ball around on a little bit of pickleball.

00:05:11.540 And here's what I discovered.

00:05:13.780 They fixed all the problems.

00:05:16.540 Here's one of the things they fixed.

00:05:18.580 A pickleball paddle is a hard paddle.

00:05:22.200 You never need to, you never need to tune up your paddle.

00:05:27.180 It's not like tennis where you need to fix your strings.

00:05:29.760 Let me, let me, let me tell you something that only, only tennis players know.

00:05:35.420 If you're like a serious weekend tennis player, watch the comments and the tennis players will confirm this.

00:05:41.980 Totally unexpected.

00:05:43.180 The number one correlation with whether I won my tennis matches against, you know, people I played with all the time or I lost was, what was the number one correlation?

00:05:56.280 How recently I had strung my racket and nothing else was even close.

00:06:00.840 There was no other factor that predicted who would win, right?

00:06:06.220 Now, just watch the other tennis players, they'll tell you.

00:06:09.420 You don't win, because usually you, you generally pick a player who is close to your ability.

00:06:15.620 And so the entire difference of who wins that day, you can play for two hours, and I can still tell you who's going to win.

00:06:24.320 It's the one who got their strings changed most recently, because it makes that much difference.

00:06:30.020 Now, paddle, pickleball, fix that.

00:06:31.940 You never have to get it re-strung.

00:06:33.380 The next thing is you always have, your tennis balls are always too new or too old.

00:06:39.900 That's something else you wouldn't know if you didn't play.

00:06:43.200 When you take a tennis ball out of the can, it's too new.

00:06:46.980 And even an experienced player has trouble handling it for several minutes.

00:06:52.040 And then you wear them out a little bit, and then they're good.

00:06:54.660 But by the end of the, toward the end, they're all worn out.

00:06:58.240 So they play completely different in the beginning than they do at the end.

00:07:02.140 It's supposed to be the same sport, but it doesn't even play the same by the end of the match.

00:07:06.100 So with pickleball, you're using this little hard plastic wiffle ball that's exactly the same from beginning to end.

00:07:14.860 And if you didn't want to, you would never have to buy another one.

00:07:19.200 You could have one ball that lasts you the rest of your life if you didn't lose it.

00:07:27.400 And then the other thing they did is that because it's a wiffle ball, when it bounces,

00:07:32.160 somebody can hit it at you pretty fast, but when it bounces, it slows down immediately

00:07:38.240 and just sets up nicely so you can hit it again, exactly where you expect it to be.

00:07:45.540 A regular tennis ball doesn't even bounce to the place you expect it.

00:07:50.340 That's the hardest thing about playing, right,

00:07:53.700 is the ball doesn't bounce the way you expect every time. It's different.

00:07:56.900 But the pickleball will bounce the same every time.

00:07:59.540 The other thing they did is that you don't have to run very much.

00:08:05.600 So if you were playing somebody competitively, you'd probably get a good workout

00:08:09.160 because, you know, you keep the ball in play for a long time.

00:08:12.280 That's the beauty of it.

00:08:13.600 And you would probably have plenty of running.

00:08:15.880 But you could also play doubles with your grandfather,

00:08:19.120 and your grandfather could play pickleball just fine

00:08:21.500 because there's not much moving in doubles.

00:08:23.440 So if somebody actually invented a game that's perfect for this part of society,

00:08:31.720 a 12-year-old could pick it up and play with a 70-year-old,

00:08:35.660 and they'd both be fine.

00:08:37.480 It's got a 15-minute learning curve.

00:08:41.020 Just think of that.

00:08:42.260 What sport has a 15-minute learning curve from never played to,

00:08:47.600 oh, I can do this pretty well.

00:08:49.180 I can do this as well as you can.

00:08:50.640 15 minutes, right?

00:08:54.540 Soccer.

00:08:55.720 Soccer would be great if they shortened the field,

00:08:59.380 got rid of out-of-bounds, which you do with indoor soccer,

00:09:02.960 shortened the field, fewer people, six-on-six, indoors.

00:09:07.740 Now that's a good game.

00:09:09.120 That is a great game.

00:09:10.760 Outdoors, some people can play.

00:09:13.860 All right.

00:09:14.240 You might be aware that I've been mocking fired Twitter employees

00:09:22.000 because I think it's funny.

00:09:27.320 Because the funny thing about it is that when Elon Musk was firing people at Twitter,

00:09:34.140 he was firing them in many cases.

00:09:37.560 They had too many people.

00:09:38.600 That was the big problem.

00:09:39.340 But in many cases, they were, let's say, famously not hard workers.

00:09:45.200 Now, I don't want to cast aspersions on every employee, obviously.

00:09:49.800 Clearly, some were hard workers, and maybe others were less serious.

00:09:53.640 But I've been running a series in Dilbert this week

00:09:57.340 where a number of the fired employees from Twitter have gotten jobs at Dilbert's company.

00:10:02.720 It's kind of perfect, isn't it?

00:10:06.160 Come on, admit it.

00:10:07.920 That is a perfect combination of headline with comic.

00:10:12.180 All right.

00:10:12.620 So here's one of them.

00:10:13.980 So this is the new Dilbert employee from Twitter.

00:10:20.420 And here's the joke.

00:10:21.920 The ex-Twitter employee now working for Dilbert's company says,

00:10:25.220 that's not how we did it when I worked at Twitter.

00:10:28.740 Then Dilbert says, maybe that's why Elon Musk fired you.

00:10:32.860 And then he says, how long are you going to use that on me?

00:10:36.600 And Dilbert says, I'm thinking three to five years.

00:10:40.220 Three to five years.

00:10:42.520 All right.

00:10:43.140 So that's all for that.

00:10:44.820 Have I ever told you that I planned 60 years in advance?

00:10:48.780 That's actually literally true.

00:10:51.380 I planned my whole life.

00:10:53.320 It worked out largely the way I planned it,

00:10:55.400 including being a famous cartoonist, which is weird.

00:10:58.380 It was that specific.

00:11:00.060 But there's one other long-range plan that I've had,

00:11:04.180 which I have talked about publicly, but not for a long time.

00:11:07.840 It goes like this.

00:11:09.880 I believed I was born at exactly the right time in history,

00:11:13.560 where if I could stay healthy into my senior years,

00:11:19.340 science would figure out how to stop aging.

00:11:21.960 I actually bet that if I really, really worked on keeping myself healthy

00:11:30.980 and kept my weight and stuff under control,

00:11:34.920 if I could reach approximately my current age and still be healthy,

00:11:39.740 that I could lock it in for the rest of my life.

00:11:42.940 Do you think that's possible?

00:11:47.760 Do you think anything like that's going to ever happen,

00:11:50.540 where you could just lock it in?

00:11:53.460 Well, it might be better than that.

00:11:57.360 So here's the story.

00:11:58.820 This is a real thing.

00:12:00.580 I'm not making this up.

00:12:01.700 So in a Boston lab, I guess there's some, let's see who's working on this,

00:12:07.100 reversing aging, but they got a big breakthrough.

00:12:10.140 We've heard this before, by the way.

00:12:12.420 You're all aware that there have been breakthroughs in aging before.

00:12:17.060 None of them really sounded real to me.

00:12:20.480 This is the first one that's ever sounded real.

00:12:22.900 And it's because of what they discovered more than how they're doing it, right?

00:12:29.760 Because I always thought to myself, can you really reverse aging?

00:12:33.500 Because the damage is already done, right?

00:12:36.580 But apparently, this is what some Boston researchers,

00:12:40.640 I think at least one person's associated with Harvard,

00:12:44.180 but they found out that it's an information problem, not a damage problem.

00:12:50.600 It's an information problem.

00:12:54.180 In other words, your body loses the information of what your DNA and your genetic makeup is.

00:13:02.680 And once it loses the information, it doesn't know how to make a new copy.

00:13:08.040 Here's what they discovered.

00:13:10.780 There's a backup copy.

00:13:14.720 No shit.

00:13:16.200 There's a backup copy.

00:13:18.600 They found the backup copy.

00:13:20.600 Let me just...

00:13:23.360 I'm going to say that three more times.

00:13:25.840 It's so mind-blowing.

00:13:27.780 It's so mind-blowing.

00:13:28.760 I just have to say it three times.

00:13:30.540 Just indulge me.

00:13:33.540 They found the backup copy.

00:13:37.440 They found the backup copy.

00:13:40.800 Did I mention they found the backup copy?

00:13:43.080 They figured out, yeah, I don't think it's in the stem cell necessarily.

00:13:50.100 I don't know the answer to where it was.

00:13:52.120 But they can actually, they can take a mouse that's old,

00:13:58.080 and they can restore its eyesight by making it younger.

00:14:02.360 They can restore its muscles.

00:14:05.380 They can restore its brain.

00:14:12.740 Its brain.

00:14:16.420 Not only can they restore it,

00:14:20.080 they've experimented going both directions.

00:14:22.380 They can make the mouse older, intentionally,

00:14:27.500 and they can make it younger, intentionally.

00:14:31.300 Now, what you're usually thinking in these cases, right,

00:14:35.580 is, okay, a lot of stuff works on mice,

00:14:39.000 and even though mice are 98% similar DNA to humans,

00:14:43.780 that 2% is a really big difference

00:14:46.240 when it comes to estimating what will happen.

00:14:49.920 There's a reason you go from mice to monkeys to humans.

00:14:53.060 You've got to test them all.

00:14:54.980 The mice aren't going to tell it.

00:14:56.740 But suppose it's true that in humans as well,

00:15:03.580 it's an information problem,

00:15:06.080 and there's a backup copy.

00:15:07.960 Because that appears to be the case with the mice.

00:15:11.320 It's just an information problem,

00:15:13.420 and they found the backup copy.

00:15:15.720 If they do that with humans,

00:15:19.420 there's, I hate to say it's common sense,

00:15:22.500 because common sense is totally magical thinking

00:15:24.520 and confirmation bias,

00:15:26.340 but it seems to me

00:15:27.720 that if it's an information problem,

00:15:31.940 and this is a big leap, I know,

00:15:34.060 there's a greater likelihood

00:15:35.580 it would work in humans without bad effect.

00:15:38.520 Does that make sense?

00:15:40.480 It's not like they're introducing a chemical

00:15:43.100 necessarily that's changing the nature

00:15:46.900 of your DNA or something.

00:15:48.460 If the only thing they do is find the backup copy

00:15:51.240 and restore it,

00:15:53.840 I wonder who we might actually be able to change aging.

00:16:01.300 Do you know that big problem of the demographic bubble?

00:16:06.280 It's going to get worse,

00:16:07.560 but maybe better.

00:16:09.440 Because maybe you take a bunch of 70-year-olds

00:16:12.600 and you say,

00:16:13.060 oh, no,

00:16:13.720 if we make you all live to 100,

00:16:16.340 we're not going to have enough money to survive.

00:16:19.560 But instead you say,

00:16:20.860 hey,

00:16:21.860 you're 75 years old,

00:16:23.260 you used to be retired,

00:16:24.560 but now we're going to make you feel like you're 25 years old.

00:16:27.140 If you want,

00:16:27.640 go back to work.

00:16:28.740 And people say,

00:16:29.660 oh, okay,

00:16:30.580 I feel good,

00:16:31.220 I'll go back to work.

00:16:31.900 But the way that things could play out

00:16:34.880 in the next 50 years

00:16:36.120 are so unpredictable.

00:16:38.820 If you add AI

00:16:40.240 and immortality

00:16:42.400 and robots

00:16:44.200 and space travel,

00:16:47.000 how do you predict anything?

00:16:49.760 There's literally nothing you can predict anymore.

00:16:54.360 All right,

00:16:55.280 there's a company called,

00:16:56.560 I wrote about this in my book,

00:16:58.320 Loser Think.

00:16:58.860 It was a company called ClimeWorks,

00:17:01.340 C-L-I-M-E,

00:17:03.280 ClimeWorks,

00:17:04.080 all one word.

00:17:05.520 And they're in production now

00:17:07.620 with a carbon sucking machine.

00:17:13.060 So it sucks carbon out of the air

00:17:14.940 and they store it underground.

00:17:18.000 Now,

00:17:18.660 what is the first thing you'd say

00:17:20.260 about a thing like that

00:17:21.480 that couldn't possibly be cost effective, right?

00:17:25.820 Takes a whole bunch of energy.

00:17:27.360 You know,

00:17:28.100 that's a bad thing to need.

00:17:29.780 So you got to use a lot of energy

00:17:31.340 to suck it out of the sky,

00:17:32.920 but there's no way

00:17:33.620 it can be economical.

00:17:35.640 They found a way

00:17:36.560 to make it economical.

00:17:39.700 That's a big deal.

00:17:41.460 And the way they did it is

00:17:42.760 they,

00:17:44.360 there are such things

00:17:46.320 as carbon credits

00:17:47.420 and they're big companies

00:17:49.060 that can't reach their carbon,

00:17:51.460 let's say, goals.

00:17:53.340 So a company like Microsoft

00:17:54.780 will say,

00:17:55.680 oh damn,

00:17:57.160 you know,

00:17:57.400 we can't really beat Microsoft

00:17:58.780 and not meet our

00:17:59.900 climate change goals, right?

00:18:02.640 That's just too politically

00:18:03.940 employee-wise.

00:18:06.640 It just is a bad look.

00:18:08.140 So Microsoft

00:18:08.860 will go to a company like this

00:18:10.380 and say,

00:18:11.340 what's it going to cost me

00:18:12.600 to pay you some money

00:18:14.860 to remove some carbon

00:18:17.420 that I can claim

00:18:19.020 because I paid the money?

00:18:20.100 So you don't have to

00:18:21.320 do it yourself.

00:18:22.700 You can just be the one

00:18:23.520 that causes it to happen

00:18:24.540 and get some kind

00:18:25.460 of carbon credit.

00:18:27.280 So Microsoft goes to them

00:18:28.540 and says,

00:18:28.940 what's it cost to remove

00:18:30.620 a bunch of carbon

00:18:31.360 so I can meet my goals?

00:18:32.880 And they give them a price

00:18:34.340 and then what does Microsoft say?

00:18:36.720 Holy what?

00:18:38.840 You're going to charge that much?

00:18:41.440 That's insane.

00:18:42.380 That's like,

00:18:42.780 that's like a hundred times

00:18:44.140 more than I think it's worth.

00:18:46.080 And then what do they do?

00:18:47.640 Then they pay it.

00:18:49.420 Then they pay it

00:18:50.460 because they don't have

00:18:51.300 another choice.

00:18:52.800 Because not meeting

00:18:53.960 their climate goals

00:18:55.060 would just be so terrible.

00:18:57.100 And Microsoft is so big

00:18:58.560 that they can overpay

00:19:00.560 by a hundred times

00:19:01.720 on some, you know,

00:19:02.940 smaller part of their

00:19:04.820 financial statement.

00:19:07.040 And it still makes sense

00:19:08.460 because they're not really

00:19:10.060 buying a better climate.

00:19:12.360 They're buying reputation.

00:19:16.100 And so this company

00:19:17.380 allows you to buy reputation.

00:19:19.900 At the same time,

00:19:21.440 you might be doing

00:19:22.160 something good

00:19:22.760 for the climate.

00:19:24.180 They actually solve

00:19:25.440 the economics.

00:19:27.320 Do you know

00:19:27.800 what a big deal that is?

00:19:30.020 It's almost incalculable

00:19:32.660 in terms of what a big deal

00:19:35.120 that could be.

00:19:36.900 It could make,

00:19:37.980 you know,

00:19:38.480 it could make it

00:19:40.580 completely practical

00:19:41.640 to do this technology.

00:19:44.660 Now, you remember,

00:19:45.800 I think this is still in place,

00:19:48.020 but didn't Elon Musk

00:19:49.260 offer some kind of

00:19:50.700 X-prize

00:19:51.620 for whoever comes up

00:19:53.360 with the best

00:19:53.800 carbon capture

00:19:54.680 technology?

00:19:57.300 So this company

00:19:58.920 is using the technology

00:20:00.420 probably at least part

00:20:02.380 since 2009.

00:20:05.340 That's when they started,

00:20:06.520 around then.

00:20:07.700 So they've been in business

00:20:08.800 for a long time

00:20:09.560 and it takes a long time

00:20:10.360 to build the assets.

00:20:11.180 So they're probably

00:20:12.540 just guessing

00:20:14.000 five to ten years

00:20:16.260 behind the technology curve

00:20:17.760 because at some point

00:20:19.380 you just have to

00:20:20.040 build what is available.

00:20:21.580 You can't wait forever.

00:20:23.040 It takes a few years

00:20:23.900 to build it.

00:20:24.940 So you're always

00:20:25.440 behind technology

00:20:26.760 by the time you're done.

00:20:30.120 Yeah.

00:20:30.640 No, I see the comments.

00:20:32.480 I understand that it's ESG,

00:20:33.940 but the carbon credit part,

00:20:41.160 if that's the only part

00:20:43.180 and big companies

00:20:44.400 just buy their way out of it,

00:20:47.300 it might turn into

00:20:48.120 something good.

00:20:49.540 Good.

00:20:50.640 Now, you could argue

00:20:51.680 that there's no reason

00:20:52.640 to do it

00:20:53.440 and they'll suck

00:20:54.600 all the carbon

00:20:55.440 out of the air

00:20:56.020 and all your plants

00:20:57.340 will die.

00:20:57.760 But I feel like

00:20:59.580 the Adam's Law

00:21:01.600 of slow-moving disasters

00:21:02.900 is working perfectly

00:21:04.980 for climate change

00:21:06.220 because one of two things

00:21:08.240 is going to happen.

00:21:08.920 We're either going to find out

00:21:09.900 it was never real

00:21:11.240 and totally possible.

00:21:14.960 I'm still going to call it

00:21:16.260 I still want to kill ESG,

00:21:18.740 but I don't think

00:21:19.640 you need ESG

00:21:20.440 to have a climate objective.

00:21:24.060 I think the companies

00:21:24.860 just do that on their own

00:21:25.980 at this point

00:21:26.520 because it looks good.

00:21:27.760 I don't think

00:21:28.320 they need ESG

00:21:29.320 to be driving it.

00:21:30.380 So I think you can

00:21:31.060 separate those two things.

00:21:33.600 All right.

00:21:35.280 Here is the least surprising

00:21:37.200 news item

00:21:38.980 you'll ever hear.

00:21:41.120 ABC is reporting

00:21:42.240 that climate change

00:21:43.220 is causing heart attacks.

00:21:51.400 Can you all join me

00:21:53.260 in a long, sarcastic sigh?

00:21:57.760 Because sometimes words

00:21:59.140 words don't really capture

00:22:01.520 what you're thinking, right?

00:22:03.600 I'd like to lead you all

00:22:05.120 in a long sigh

00:22:06.300 about ABC reporting

00:22:08.600 that climate change

00:22:09.460 is causing heart attacks.

00:22:10.740 At this time,

00:22:12.760 at this very interesting time,

00:22:14.740 of course they are.

00:22:23.300 Of course they are.

00:22:26.120 But here's the interesting thing.

00:22:28.700 They might have data

00:22:29.680 to back it.

00:22:32.560 Apparently it's a thing.

00:22:34.660 Apparently it's a thing.

00:22:35.600 So they believe

00:22:37.360 they found correlation

00:22:38.480 between excess heat

00:22:41.620 and athletes dying

00:22:44.600 suddenly from heart attacks.

00:22:48.160 Turns out,

00:22:49.660 they claim

00:22:50.480 that the athletes

00:22:52.260 keeling over

00:22:52.920 with heart attacks

00:22:53.680 are far more likely

00:22:54.700 to happen

00:22:55.180 in these unusually hot

00:22:57.560 places.

00:22:59.040 Do you believe that?

00:23:03.700 That's a little hard

00:23:04.640 to believe.

00:23:05.940 But,

00:23:07.160 I would like to

00:23:08.500 refer to you

00:23:09.440 to the

00:23:11.000 Sherrill Law

00:23:12.700 of Restaurants.

00:23:14.600 The Sherrill Law

00:23:16.060 of Restaurants

00:23:16.800 is that

00:23:18.240 as soon as anything

00:23:19.460 changes in the environment,

00:23:21.100 people stop going

00:23:21.860 to the restaurant

00:23:22.400 for a while.

00:23:24.200 So if it gets

00:23:25.180 really warm outside,

00:23:26.240 like the weather

00:23:26.680 is really nice,

00:23:27.380 for a few weeks

00:23:29.040 people stop going

00:23:29.780 to restaurants.

00:23:31.100 If it rains,

00:23:33.380 people stop going

00:23:34.120 to restaurants

00:23:34.700 until it stops.

00:23:36.580 If it's tax day,

00:23:39.140 people stop going

00:23:39.840 to restaurants.

00:23:40.900 Basically,

00:23:41.840 anything that changes

00:23:42.880 makes people

00:23:43.980 stop their behavior.

00:23:45.660 And what happens

00:23:46.280 when people change

00:23:47.060 their behavior?

00:23:48.780 Stress.

00:23:50.860 So it's also a thing

00:23:52.760 that whenever

00:23:54.740 there's any big change

00:23:55.960 in society,

00:23:56.700 that's disruptive

00:23:58.540 to us mentally

00:23:59.500 as well as physically,

00:24:00.720 people have more

00:24:01.500 heart attacks.

00:24:02.920 Basically,

00:24:03.560 everything that's

00:24:04.240 a big change

00:24:05.000 causes heart attacks.

00:24:07.580 And so,

00:24:08.180 one expert

00:24:09.200 I told you about

00:24:10.040 already,

00:24:10.780 said that the pandemic

00:24:11.880 itself

00:24:12.500 and the lockdowns

00:24:13.820 should create

00:24:15.240 a lot of heart attacks.

00:24:16.780 It's exactly

00:24:17.400 what you should say.

00:24:18.440 A lot of

00:24:18.860 unexplained heart attacks.

00:24:20.700 So,

00:24:21.000 I'm not going

00:24:23.480 to be the one

00:24:23.960 that tells you

00:24:24.540 that the vaccinations

00:24:26.520 are completely safe

00:24:28.120 because nobody

00:24:29.320 ever thought that.

00:24:30.680 Even people in favor

00:24:31.900 of that knew

00:24:32.340 that there was

00:24:32.780 risk involved.

00:24:33.960 For some people,

00:24:34.740 for sure.

00:24:35.960 So,

00:24:36.840 it does,

00:24:39.000 even to me,

00:24:40.380 and I'm trying

00:24:41.160 to remain skeptical

00:24:41.980 as long as possible,

00:24:43.140 it does look to me

00:24:44.100 like the myocarditis

00:24:45.320 is not entirely

00:24:46.940 environmentally caused.

00:24:48.940 Can we agree?

00:24:50.820 It sure doesn't

00:24:51.580 look like it.

00:24:53.220 Does everybody

00:24:53.840 agree with that statement?

00:24:55.600 You know,

00:24:55.840 we could all be surprised

00:24:56.940 by data being

00:24:58.100 misleading,

00:24:59.960 but it sure looks

00:25:01.760 like something's

00:25:02.420 going on.

00:25:03.380 So,

00:25:03.680 I agree with you

00:25:04.460 on how it feels,

00:25:06.460 and I agree

00:25:07.040 with how it looks.

00:25:08.460 Now,

00:25:08.980 what happens

00:25:09.440 when somebody

00:25:09.960 like Lisa Marie Presley

00:25:11.500 dies,

00:25:12.140 unfortunately,

00:25:12.920 at 51?

00:25:15.320 What was she,

00:25:16.420 54?

00:25:17.240 She was early 50s,

00:25:18.200 right?

00:25:18.920 And she died

00:25:19.680 of a heart attack.

00:25:22.540 Now,

00:25:23.820 she also had

00:25:24.660 a history,

00:25:25.480 54 years old,

00:25:26.380 okay.

00:25:26.940 She also had

00:25:27.520 a history of drugs,

00:25:29.420 and if you see

00:25:30.440 any picture of her,

00:25:31.420 she does not look

00:25:32.100 like, you know,

00:25:33.120 a healthy person.

00:25:35.380 So,

00:25:35.980 if you're going

00:25:36.480 to pick somebody

00:25:37.100 to have a heart attack,

00:25:39.200 you know,

00:25:39.460 she'd be on your

00:25:40.140 short list,

00:25:40.740 I think,

00:25:41.040 even at her age.

00:25:45.320 So,

00:25:45.840 of course,

00:25:46.260 we all will

00:25:46.900 jump to conclusions

00:25:48.160 about what killed her.

00:25:50.320 I'm sure it was

00:25:51.220 climate change.

00:25:53.160 Just kidding.

00:25:54.840 All right.

00:25:57.900 Oh,

00:25:58.160 believe it or not,

00:25:59.700 it's also true

00:26:00.420 that pharmaceutical

00:26:01.740 medicines can work

00:26:03.940 differently in high heat.

00:26:06.780 I think it's true,

00:26:08.280 or at least

00:26:08.740 it's reported.

00:26:09.340 Let's assume

00:26:10.600 that everything

00:26:11.020 could be sketchy,

00:26:12.260 so we won't assume

00:26:13.120 it's true.

00:26:13.440 But they actually

00:26:14.520 have some indication,

00:26:16.560 maybe short of proof,

00:26:18.080 but they have

00:26:18.520 some indication

00:26:19.180 that a medication

00:26:21.840 that was really

00:26:22.600 good for you

00:26:23.340 will kill you

00:26:25.060 above a certain

00:26:26.160 temperature outdoors.

00:26:29.120 If you're active,

00:26:30.220 I guess.

00:26:30.680 Not if you just

00:26:31.560 walk outdoors.

00:26:33.020 But,

00:26:34.260 I don't know,

00:26:35.780 does that sound true?

00:26:37.780 I don't know,

00:26:38.860 maybe.

00:26:39.300 I saw a tweet

00:26:41.540 by Antonio Guterres

00:26:43.940 who claims

00:26:45.420 that the past

00:26:46.060 eight years

00:26:46.660 were the warmest

00:26:47.540 on record globally.

00:26:51.620 And,

00:26:52.200 you know,

00:26:52.380 therefore,

00:26:53.260 blah, blah, blah.

00:26:54.400 Now,

00:26:54.920 what is left

00:26:55.680 out of that?

00:26:57.180 Well,

00:26:57.620 I'm not sure

00:26:58.400 because I don't

00:26:59.320 believe anything

00:26:59.880 about data

00:27:00.940 and temperature.

00:27:02.220 But,

00:27:02.800 I just saw a claim

00:27:04.320 the other day

00:27:04.940 that 2022

00:27:05.800 set no records.

00:27:07.160 Could they both

00:27:09.900 be true?

00:27:11.760 Could it be true

00:27:12.640 that 2022

00:27:13.320 set no weather

00:27:14.620 records

00:27:15.180 while at the

00:27:16.700 same time

00:27:17.340 the past

00:27:18.120 eight years

00:27:18.700 were the warmest

00:27:19.440 on record globally?

00:27:21.060 Because that

00:27:21.720 is a record.

00:27:23.620 So,

00:27:24.180 we've got one person

00:27:24.960 saying no records

00:27:25.820 were set

00:27:26.480 and another one

00:27:28.020 saying,

00:27:28.420 yep,

00:27:28.700 we just set a record

00:27:29.640 for the

00:27:31.020 eight hottest years.

00:27:34.420 Yeah.

00:27:34.540 both could

00:27:36.720 be true-ish.

00:27:39.280 Could be true-ish.

00:27:40.700 But you see

00:27:41.240 the problem,

00:27:41.800 right?

00:27:42.480 Now,

00:27:43.920 there's a class

00:27:45.780 of people

00:27:46.340 on Twitter

00:27:47.540 who really,

00:27:49.040 really like to

00:27:49.700 argue the

00:27:50.320 technical,

00:27:51.500 factual accuracy

00:27:52.580 of statements

00:27:53.900 that really

00:27:54.520 should not be

00:27:55.400 analyzed for

00:27:56.580 exact technical

00:27:58.260 accuracy.

00:27:59.360 This is one

00:28:00.220 of them.

00:28:01.140 All right?

00:28:01.300 If you're

00:28:02.660 nickel-and-diming

00:28:03.420 me about

00:28:03.920 the words

00:28:04.720 or really

00:28:05.420 talking about

00:28:05.940 two different

00:28:06.420 things,

00:28:06.860 I get it.

00:28:08.080 I get it.

00:28:08.880 They were

00:28:09.180 talking about

00:28:09.800 two slightly

00:28:11.020 different things,

00:28:12.100 but it is

00:28:13.080 nonetheless true

00:28:13.980 that you either

00:28:16.560 set a record

00:28:17.120 or you didn't.

00:28:17.900 You know,

00:28:18.080 that's kind of

00:28:18.560 binary.

00:28:19.760 But,

00:28:20.180 here's my

00:28:20.580 larger point.

00:28:22.560 Can you

00:28:23.240 trust anything

00:28:24.000 on records

00:28:26.480 and weather?

00:28:27.820 I don't think

00:28:28.580 so.

00:28:28.820 let me do

00:28:31.900 something that

00:28:32.620 confuses the

00:28:33.980 Klopp-Bertz.

00:28:35.720 I'm going to

00:28:36.420 say something

00:28:37.060 that sounds

00:28:37.740 like I'm

00:28:39.140 disagreeing

00:28:39.880 with my

00:28:40.360 own,

00:28:41.160 let's say,

00:28:42.460 team.

00:28:43.500 Because I

00:28:44.460 roughly identify

00:28:46.640 with a group

00:28:48.140 of people

00:28:48.520 who have

00:28:48.740 similar opinions.

00:28:50.920 So now I'm

00:28:51.580 going to

00:28:52.960 criticize

00:28:53.400 an argument

00:28:54.360 by my own

00:28:55.220 team.

00:28:56.200 Here's the

00:28:56.780 worst

00:28:57.420 skeptical

00:28:58.640 argument

00:28:59.180 about

00:28:59.760 climate.

00:29:01.660 This is

00:29:02.060 the worst

00:29:02.580 one.

00:29:03.860 It used

00:29:04.360 to be

00:29:04.700 warmer

00:29:05.080 and there

00:29:07.160 used to

00:29:07.580 be more

00:29:08.080 CO2,

00:29:09.600 which are

00:29:10.720 different

00:29:11.000 points.

00:29:12.060 Because the

00:29:13.620 points are

00:29:14.120 that it

00:29:15.080 used to

00:29:15.340 be warmer

00:29:15.860 at lower

00:29:16.460 CO2 and

00:29:17.560 there used

00:29:17.880 to be

00:29:18.100 more CO2

00:29:18.900 at lower

00:29:19.420 temperatures.

00:29:20.560 So if you

00:29:21.020 look back

00:29:21.400 in history,

00:29:23.900 you know,

00:29:24.480 you can see

00:29:25.020 that what

00:29:25.700 we're claiming

00:29:26.200 today doesn't

00:29:26.840 make sense.

00:29:28.640 the

00:29:34.220 Nickelback

00:29:34.720 theory of

00:29:35.400 deaths.

00:29:36.500 All right.

00:29:39.780 So here's

00:29:40.860 why those

00:29:41.280 arguments are

00:29:41.820 the worst.

00:29:43.020 I'm not

00:29:43.720 talking about

00:29:44.300 the last

00:29:44.840 20 years.

00:29:46.580 If you're

00:29:46.980 debating

00:29:47.280 the last

00:29:48.720 20 years,

00:29:49.840 that's

00:29:50.580 probably fair.

00:29:51.660 But if you

00:29:52.180 go back to

00:29:52.780 the early

00:29:53.960 days of the

00:29:54.700 planet,

00:29:55.020 and you

00:29:56.580 say,

00:29:57.060 well,

00:29:57.320 in the

00:29:57.560 early days

00:29:58.080 of the

00:29:58.320 planet,

00:29:59.060 we had

00:30:00.160 way more

00:30:00.860 CO2,

00:30:02.160 does everybody

00:30:02.900 know why

00:30:03.360 that argument

00:30:03.820 doesn't make

00:30:04.300 sense?

00:30:06.280 Are you all

00:30:07.080 aware of why

00:30:07.680 that's a

00:30:08.180 debunked

00:30:08.660 argument?

00:30:10.340 Because if

00:30:11.060 you go back

00:30:11.520 far enough,

00:30:12.940 there were

00:30:13.640 other things

00:30:14.320 that were

00:30:14.560 different.

00:30:15.600 For example,

00:30:16.600 the intensity

00:30:17.320 of the sun

00:30:17.860 was different.

00:30:18.960 The composition

00:30:19.600 of the atmosphere

00:30:20.360 was different.

00:30:20.820 So if you

00:30:21.720 go back

00:30:22.220 far enough,

00:30:25.700 it doesn't

00:30:26.460 matter what

00:30:26.860 the CO2

00:30:27.440 was,

00:30:28.080 that doesn't

00:30:28.560 tell you

00:30:28.900 anything.

00:30:29.620 Because

00:30:29.920 everything else

00:30:30.580 was different.

00:30:31.760 Does that

00:30:32.100 make sense?

00:30:33.080 If everything

00:30:33.840 was the same,

00:30:35.480 except for

00:30:36.020 the CO2,

00:30:37.100 then that

00:30:37.620 might tell

00:30:38.060 you something.

00:30:39.460 But if

00:30:39.980 everything was

00:30:40.740 different in

00:30:41.160 the past,

00:30:41.880 including CO2,

00:30:43.540 then there's

00:30:44.140 nothing about

00:30:44.640 the CO2

00:30:45.240 that tells

00:30:45.640 you anything.

00:30:46.520 Too many

00:30:46.940 variables.

00:30:48.280 And that's

00:30:48.680 the case.

00:30:50.020 Yeah,

00:30:50.120 the sun

00:30:50.620 was different,

00:30:52.260 different intensity,

00:30:53.340 just everything

00:30:53.760 was different.

00:30:57.260 However,

00:30:58.140 if you want

00:30:58.800 to make

00:30:59.000 the argument

00:30:59.500 that the

00:31:01.080 alarmists

00:31:02.560 have been

00:31:03.020 wrong for

00:31:03.780 50 years,

00:31:06.680 Daniel says

00:31:07.440 incorrect.

00:31:08.260 No,

00:31:08.580 Daniel,

00:31:09.560 the word

00:31:09.940 incorrect

00:31:10.400 means that

00:31:11.040 you're

00:31:11.240 incorrect.

00:31:12.680 And the

00:31:13.240 word wrong

00:31:13.800 means that

00:31:14.180 you're wrong.

00:31:15.440 Because if

00:31:16.240 I were wrong,

00:31:17.340 you'd give me

00:31:17.720 a reason.

00:31:19.340 Wouldn't

00:31:19.620 you?

00:31:20.120 I think

00:31:20.760 you would.

00:31:21.740 Yeah.

00:31:22.260 Yeah,

00:31:22.700 there were

00:31:22.960 a difference

00:31:23.420 in how many

00:31:23.880 plants there

00:31:24.480 were,

00:31:25.020 all kinds

00:31:25.500 of differences.

00:31:26.480 So if

00:31:27.240 you're going

00:31:27.480 to use

00:31:27.780 the past

00:31:28.440 to make

00:31:29.020 your argument,

00:31:30.360 I'd use

00:31:30.860 the last

00:31:31.280 50 years,

00:31:32.720 but I

00:31:33.060 wouldn't

00:31:33.300 use

00:31:33.820 thousands

00:31:34.480 of years

00:31:34.980 ago.

00:31:35.680 That's a

00:31:36.080 bad

00:31:36.340 argument.

00:31:38.560 Does

00:31:38.960 anybody

00:31:39.340 agree?

00:31:41.680 Because you

00:31:42.340 can still

00:31:42.740 be super

00:31:43.360 skeptical

00:31:43.860 on climate

00:31:45.080 change,

00:31:45.400 but don't

00:31:45.820 use the

00:31:46.460 historical

00:31:47.180 middle,

00:31:49.600 what do

00:31:50.740 we use,

00:31:51.140 the dark

00:31:51.680 ages and

00:31:52.280 shit?

00:31:53.320 Just ignore

00:31:53.980 all that.

00:31:54.860 And I don't

00:31:55.400 really believe

00:31:56.140 we can tell

00:31:56.600 the temperature

00:31:57.180 even 50

00:31:58.840 years ago,

00:31:59.360 frankly.

00:32:00.400 You know,

00:32:00.620 Tony Heller

00:32:01.160 is back

00:32:01.660 on Twitter.

00:32:04.320 Does everybody

00:32:04.920 remember Tony

00:32:05.620 Heller?

00:32:06.540 He's the

00:32:07.100 most prolific

00:32:08.200 data skeptic

00:32:10.460 about climate

00:32:11.040 change.

00:32:11.820 Now,

00:32:12.020 he goes

00:32:12.340 after the

00:32:12.780 data.

00:32:13.540 He says,

00:32:14.060 this data

00:32:14.520 is incorrect

00:32:15.140 and he gives

00:32:15.780 his reasons.

00:32:16.980 Now,

00:32:18.020 I spent a

00:32:18.720 lot of time

00:32:19.240 interacting with

00:32:20.080 his material

00:32:20.760 and I came

00:32:22.080 to the

00:32:22.400 following

00:32:22.680 conclusion.

00:32:24.480 I don't

00:32:25.000 know if,

00:32:27.400 you know,

00:32:27.660 I can't

00:32:28.060 judge all

00:32:28.720 of it,

00:32:30.140 but there

00:32:30.780 were enough

00:32:31.280 things there

00:32:31.780 that were

00:32:32.140 clearly wrong

00:32:33.260 in my

00:32:34.560 subjective

00:32:35.040 opinion

00:32:35.520 that I

00:32:36.660 discounted

00:32:37.280 everything else

00:32:37.940 he said.

00:32:39.080 Because

00:32:39.320 unfortunately,

00:32:40.580 even if you

00:32:41.120 write about

00:32:41.660 a bunch

00:32:41.940 of stuff,

00:32:43.060 if you

00:32:43.500 also say

00:32:44.240 a bunch

00:32:44.520 of stuff

00:32:44.840 that is

00:32:45.160 clearly

00:32:45.580 not true,

00:32:47.240 then I

00:32:47.980 discount all

00:32:48.560 the rest.

00:32:49.460 But it

00:32:49.760 doesn't mean

00:32:50.140 it's not

00:32:50.460 true.

00:32:51.960 I mean,

00:32:52.580 I have a

00:32:53.520 feeling he's

00:32:54.180 got some

00:32:54.580 good points

00:32:55.180 in there.

00:32:55.880 It's just

00:32:56.140 you can't

00:32:56.520 tell which

00:32:56.860 ones.

00:32:57.800 Because some

00:32:58.240 of them

00:32:58.460 clearly don't

00:32:59.240 look true

00:32:59.620 to me.

00:33:00.500 Just,

00:33:00.860 you know,

00:33:01.800 you can

00:33:02.720 just almost

00:33:03.460 tell what's

00:33:04.080 wrong with

00:33:04.440 them by

00:33:04.660 looking at

00:33:05.040 them.

00:33:05.900 Now,

00:33:06.860 he does

00:33:07.460 a lot of

00:33:08.200 analysis on

00:33:09.000 a lot of

00:33:09.340 different things.

00:33:10.000 Is there

00:33:10.300 any chance

00:33:11.200 he could be

00:33:11.660 right about

00:33:12.140 any of it?

00:33:12.780 Or,

00:33:13.000 I'm sorry,

00:33:13.780 is there any

00:33:14.300 chance he

00:33:15.220 could be

00:33:15.800 right about

00:33:17.220 all of it?

00:33:17.900 Because he

00:33:18.200 makes a lot

00:33:18.820 of claims.

00:33:20.100 Not really.

00:33:21.260 There's nobody

00:33:21.980 who could be

00:33:22.460 right about a

00:33:23.240 lot of claims

00:33:23.940 on sketchy

00:33:25.460 data.

00:33:26.180 Nobody could

00:33:26.700 do that.

00:33:27.560 Is he right

00:33:28.180 about some

00:33:29.060 of it being

00:33:30.220 a lie or

00:33:31.280 misleading?

00:33:32.620 Almost

00:33:33.160 certainly true.

00:33:34.620 Some of it.

00:33:35.840 I just don't

00:33:36.380 know if it's

00:33:36.800 important.

00:33:37.180 But what's

00:33:39.660 interesting is

00:33:40.420 that he was

00:33:41.140 completely

00:33:41.540 suppressed by

00:33:42.560 the platforms.

00:33:44.940 When he's

00:33:45.760 not suppressed,

00:33:47.220 he's back on

00:33:47.940 Twitter quite

00:33:48.440 active,

00:33:49.380 he does

00:33:49.940 move the

00:33:50.520 ball.

00:33:52.300 He actually

00:33:53.080 changes the

00:33:53.800 whole argument,

00:33:54.500 in my opinion,

00:33:55.480 because he

00:33:56.440 always presents

00:33:57.100 graphics and

00:33:58.200 data.

00:33:59.540 He always

00:33:59.980 shows his

00:34:00.440 work.

00:34:01.600 And what

00:34:02.560 have I told

00:34:03.000 you about a

00:34:03.440 documentary?

00:34:03.940 All documentaries

00:34:06.180 are persuasive,

00:34:07.380 even if they're

00:34:08.000 lies.

00:34:08.780 They're really

00:34:09.540 persuasive,

00:34:10.300 because you

00:34:10.620 don't see the

00:34:11.080 other side.

00:34:12.120 When Tony

00:34:12.800 Heller does

00:34:13.340 his presentations,

00:34:14.680 they are super

00:34:15.780 persuasive.

00:34:17.900 Persuasion-wise,

00:34:19.720 he's a

00:34:20.700 champion.

00:34:21.480 He's really

00:34:21.920 persuasive.

00:34:23.140 But what he

00:34:24.040 isn't,

00:34:24.620 necessarily,

00:34:26.040 is credible

00:34:27.060 enough that I

00:34:29.420 could accept

00:34:30.040 his more

00:34:30.780 extreme claims.

00:34:32.620 But he's

00:34:33.900 really interesting.

00:34:34.700 I'm kind of

00:34:35.060 glad he's

00:34:35.440 back,

00:34:35.820 frankly.

00:34:36.500 I like the

00:34:37.300 fact that he

00:34:37.680 makes everybody

00:34:38.300 answer to his

00:34:40.220 claims.

00:34:41.120 And you should

00:34:42.100 also know that

00:34:42.660 there are people

00:34:43.080 who make a

00:34:44.080 job of

00:34:44.580 debunking him,

00:34:45.820 and do a

00:34:46.360 good job.

00:34:47.900 So if you

00:34:48.480 were to look,

00:34:49.060 just Google

00:34:50.580 his name,

00:34:51.340 and Google

00:34:52.180 the word

00:34:52.600 debunk,

00:34:53.220 which is a

00:34:53.680 good thing

00:34:54.000 to do,

00:34:54.320 by the way,

00:34:55.240 you're going

00:34:55.700 to see a

00:34:56.320 lot of his

00:34:57.020 claims allegedly

00:34:58.700 debunked.

00:35:00.080 But can you

00:35:00.700 believe the

00:35:01.140 debunker?

00:35:02.620 What do you

00:35:03.020 think?

00:35:03.800 Can you

00:35:04.200 believe the

00:35:04.700 debunker,

00:35:05.260 no matter who

00:35:05.760 it is?

00:35:06.200 Doesn't matter

00:35:06.640 who it is.

00:35:06.980 Can you

00:35:07.200 believe him?

00:35:08.640 No.

00:35:09.600 No.

00:35:10.600 Because they

00:35:11.140 only show

00:35:11.480 one side.

00:35:13.080 Everybody who

00:35:13.740 is just

00:35:13.960 saying one

00:35:14.440 side,

00:35:15.460 you don't

00:35:15.800 believe any

00:35:16.180 of them.

00:35:17.280 They're

00:35:17.580 advocates.

00:35:19.260 Now,

00:35:19.460 if the

00:35:19.840 debunker

00:35:20.340 said,

00:35:21.820 and I

00:35:22.120 don't believe

00:35:22.540 this has

00:35:22.880 ever happened,

00:35:23.860 but if the

00:35:24.380 debunker

00:35:24.780 said,

00:35:25.080 you know,

00:35:25.260 I've got to

00:35:25.620 admit,

00:35:26.620 40% of the

00:35:27.720 things he

00:35:28.100 says,

00:35:28.640 they check

00:35:29.200 out.

00:35:30.200 But be

00:35:30.840 careful,

00:35:31.200 because 60%

00:35:32.080 doesn't,

00:35:33.540 I would

00:35:34.040 believe that

00:35:34.600 debunker.

00:35:35.820 I would

00:35:36.500 immediately say,

00:35:37.440 oh,

00:35:38.340 that's the

00:35:38.780 first credible

00:35:39.460 person I've

00:35:40.040 heard,

00:35:40.780 because they're

00:35:41.120 saying some

00:35:42.360 true,

00:35:42.780 some not.

00:35:43.880 That feels

00:35:44.640 like a fair

00:35:45.300 analysis,

00:35:46.720 because there's

00:35:47.240 no way he's

00:35:47.940 wrong about

00:35:48.400 everything.

00:35:49.900 Right?

00:35:51.200 I mean,

00:35:51.460 he produces a

00:35:52.260 lot of content.

00:35:53.060 He's not wrong

00:35:53.640 about everything.

00:35:55.300 That would be

00:35:56.000 almost impossible,

00:35:57.000 because,

00:35:57.720 you know,

00:35:57.960 he puts a lot

00:35:58.520 of intellectual

00:35:59.080 rigor in it,

00:35:59.920 whether it's

00:36:00.260 right or

00:36:00.560 wrong.

00:36:02.000 So,

00:36:02.600 anyway,

00:36:05.160 if we can't

00:36:06.300 predict,

00:36:08.380 here's my

00:36:09.040 point.

00:36:10.140 I don't

00:36:10.880 believe we

00:36:11.480 can even

00:36:11.920 agree what

00:36:12.700 the weather

00:36:13.100 was recently.

00:36:15.120 True or

00:36:15.780 false?

00:36:17.000 We have

00:36:17.680 trouble agreeing

00:36:18.720 what the

00:36:19.400 weather was,

00:36:20.940 even recently.

00:36:23.440 How the hell

00:36:24.180 are we going

00:36:24.500 to predict the

00:36:25.020 weather in

00:36:25.360 80 years?

00:36:25.820 Who predicted

00:36:28.960 that Klein

00:36:29.580 works would

00:36:30.360 find a model

00:36:31.400 that works?

00:36:32.180 Who predicted

00:36:32.860 that Elon

00:36:33.340 Musk would

00:36:33.900 offer an

00:36:34.340 X-Prize

00:36:35.000 for carbon

00:36:36.300 capture?

00:36:38.000 I mean,

00:36:38.460 there's just

00:36:38.840 so much

00:36:39.220 that's going

00:36:39.520 to be

00:36:39.660 different.

00:36:41.760 All right.

00:36:46.600 So,

00:36:47.280 what about

00:36:47.580 those gas

00:36:48.480 ovens?

00:36:49.580 There's a

00:36:50.140 whole bunch

00:36:50.420 of confusion

00:36:51.020 about whether

00:36:51.660 the Democrats

00:36:52.380 really wanted

00:36:53.200 to take away

00:36:53.780 your gas

00:36:54.240 oven,

00:36:54.500 or did

00:36:55.680 they really

00:36:56.140 want to

00:36:56.500 just ban

00:36:57.000 the future

00:36:57.620 ones,

00:36:58.640 or was it

00:36:59.660 all made

00:37:00.060 up?

00:37:00.720 I can't

00:37:01.220 even tell.

00:37:01.840 I'm not

00:37:02.140 even sure

00:37:02.460 it matters.

00:37:03.580 But is

00:37:05.460 it perfect

00:37:06.060 that they're

00:37:08.280 actually gas

00:37:08.980 lighting us?

00:37:11.400 That's a

00:37:12.000 little too

00:37:12.360 perfect,

00:37:12.820 isn't it?

00:37:13.740 It's

00:37:14.080 literally

00:37:14.620 gas light.

00:37:18.040 I mean,

00:37:20.800 it's less

00:37:21.560 about the

00:37:21.940 light,

00:37:22.340 but it's

00:37:22.580 more about

00:37:22.940 the gas.

00:37:24.260 And it's

00:37:25.640 just too

00:37:26.020 weird.

00:37:27.920 It's just

00:37:28.580 built into

00:37:29.060 the name

00:37:29.460 there.

00:37:31.840 All right.

00:37:33.600 So,

00:37:34.420 I guess

00:37:35.420 our gas

00:37:36.260 ovens might

00:37:36.940 be killing

00:37:37.800 us,

00:37:38.520 and of

00:37:39.880 course,

00:37:40.200 climate change

00:37:40.760 might be

00:37:41.100 killing us,

00:37:41.900 but not

00:37:42.660 those vaccinations,

00:37:43.840 damn it,

00:37:45.180 that you call

00:37:46.120 jabs.

00:37:46.700 couldn't be

00:37:48.380 that.

00:37:49.060 Couldn't be

00:37:49.440 that.

00:37:52.120 Let me

00:37:52.780 ask you a

00:37:53.180 question.

00:37:56.240 Regardless

00:37:56.800 of how much

00:37:57.800 damage is

00:37:59.100 or is not

00:37:59.740 done by

00:38:00.420 the jabs

00:38:01.700 themselves,

00:38:03.720 would you

00:38:04.740 agree with

00:38:05.260 the following

00:38:05.760 statement?

00:38:07.620 There is

00:38:08.640 a mass

00:38:09.180 hysteria going

00:38:10.020 on right

00:38:10.460 now about

00:38:11.780 the side

00:38:12.220 effects of

00:38:12.680 the jabs,

00:38:13.780 even if

00:38:14.500 it's true.

00:38:15.720 Like,

00:38:16.040 even if some

00:38:16.580 of the data

00:38:16.980 is alarming

00:38:17.900 and true,

00:38:18.860 wouldn't you

00:38:19.440 say that

00:38:19.940 there's a

00:38:20.280 mass hysteria

00:38:21.000 at the

00:38:21.440 same time?

00:38:24.840 I'm saying

00:38:25.220 more yes

00:38:25.720 than no's.

00:38:26.480 Because it

00:38:27.600 could be

00:38:27.940 true at

00:38:29.160 its base,

00:38:30.100 but also

00:38:31.120 blown up

00:38:31.760 into something

00:38:32.280 a little bit

00:38:32.800 bigger than

00:38:33.260 that.

00:38:34.380 To me,

00:38:34.820 it looks like

00:38:35.300 at the very

00:38:36.660 least it's

00:38:37.200 a mass

00:38:37.520 hysteria.

00:38:38.480 So I'm

00:38:38.980 going to

00:38:39.120 say the

00:38:39.360 one thing

00:38:39.760 that I

00:38:40.440 am sure

00:38:41.200 of at

00:38:41.660 this point

00:38:42.260 is that

00:38:43.540 some

00:38:43.800 percentage

00:38:44.340 of it

00:38:44.660 is mass

00:38:45.040 hysteria.

00:38:46.080 Because that's

00:38:46.480 what gets

00:38:46.820 you to

00:38:47.140 talk about,

00:38:48.260 I mean,

00:38:48.640 Lisa Marie

00:38:49.180 Presley was

00:38:50.920 not a

00:38:51.360 healthy-looking

00:38:52.060 person,

00:38:53.420 not healthy-looking,

00:38:54.500 and she had

00:38:54.860 a history of

00:38:56.700 drug abuse.

00:39:00.220 You know,

00:39:00.900 if you see

00:39:01.480 that one,

00:39:02.420 and you see

00:39:02.980 the football

00:39:03.780 player,

00:39:04.900 and your

00:39:05.460 anecdotes,

00:39:06.160 which actually

00:39:06.700 might be,

00:39:07.800 it might be

00:39:08.300 exactly what

00:39:08.940 you think

00:39:09.220 there.

00:39:10.060 I'm not

00:39:10.780 eliminating that.

00:39:11.880 I just

00:39:12.200 think it's

00:39:12.960 obvious at

00:39:13.580 this point

00:39:13.980 we've also

00:39:14.660 reached a

00:39:15.180 hysteria,

00:39:16.200 even if

00:39:18.560 there's

00:39:18.720 something at

00:39:19.100 the basement.

00:39:20.300 And at

00:39:20.540 this point,

00:39:20.920 I'm leaning

00:39:21.220 toward yes,

00:39:23.360 in case you're

00:39:23.840 wondering.

00:39:26.240 I'm leaning

00:39:26.900 toward the

00:39:28.340 signals are so

00:39:29.940 big, and

00:39:30.760 the pharma

00:39:32.220 companies appear

00:39:33.020 to have been

00:39:33.520 lying to us.

00:39:35.100 Now, I

00:39:35.460 heard a

00:39:36.380 hypothesis

00:39:37.000 from

00:39:37.620 Dyson.

00:39:41.300 What's the

00:39:42.220 name of

00:39:42.600 the

00:39:43.120 astrophysicist

00:39:45.860 Dyson?

00:39:47.740 What's his

00:39:48.300 first name?

00:39:49.300 He's got

00:39:49.580 like a

00:39:49.840 three-name

00:39:50.280 name.

00:39:51.960 Give me

00:39:52.300 his name.

00:39:54.380 Neil

00:39:54.800 Dyson.

00:39:59.320 Neil

00:39:59.660 Freeman

00:40:00.020 Dyson.

00:40:01.780 Okay.

00:40:02.960 I always

00:40:03.520 get his

00:40:03.820 name wrong.

00:40:06.920 Neil

00:40:07.480 Degrassi

00:40:08.240 Dyson.

00:40:11.300 Neil

00:40:11.540 Degrassi.

00:40:12.080 All right.

00:40:12.480 Sorry.

00:40:13.140 I apologize

00:40:13.620 to Neil

00:40:14.560 for

00:40:14.980 butchering

00:40:16.980 his name.

00:40:18.920 So he

00:40:19.420 had a

00:40:19.680 theory that

00:40:20.520 I thought

00:40:21.120 I heard

00:40:21.560 on the

00:40:21.780 podcast

00:40:22.200 that goes

00:40:22.520 like this.

00:40:23.520 Do you

00:40:23.680 remember when

00:40:24.240 the claim

00:40:25.580 was that the

00:40:26.160 vaccinations

00:40:26.700 were like

00:40:27.340 100%

00:40:28.500 effective in

00:40:29.460 stopping the

00:40:30.040 spread?

00:40:31.320 You all

00:40:31.760 remember that,

00:40:32.400 right?

00:40:32.800 It's hard to

00:40:33.340 forget.

00:40:34.560 And then it

00:40:35.080 turned out

00:40:35.580 not even

00:40:36.900 close.

00:40:38.460 Closer to

00:40:39.240 zero in

00:40:41.600 time.

00:40:42.400 Now here

00:40:42.800 was his

00:40:43.260 explanation

00:40:43.820 that I

00:40:44.740 had not

00:40:45.060 heard before.

00:40:47.140 And I'm

00:40:47.600 not going to

00:40:48.480 and for the

00:40:49.300 Klopbert's,

00:40:50.500 I'm going to

00:40:51.040 describe what

00:40:51.720 he said,

00:40:52.580 which is

00:40:53.260 different from

00:40:53.820 me agreeing

00:40:54.380 with it.

00:40:55.320 You get

00:40:55.940 that?

00:40:57.420 But I'd

00:40:58.120 never heard

00:40:58.460 this explanation.

00:40:59.180 And the

00:41:00.260 explanation was

00:41:01.220 that when

00:41:02.420 alpha was

00:41:03.740 essentially the

00:41:04.880 primary thing

00:41:05.700 they were

00:41:05.920 looking at,

00:41:06.860 it might be

00:41:08.240 true that

00:41:10.080 the original

00:41:10.860 vaccination,

00:41:12.820 it might be

00:41:13.320 true that

00:41:14.720 if the only

00:41:15.680 thing out

00:41:16.300 there was

00:41:16.680 alpha, it

00:41:18.020 might have

00:41:18.280 actually stopped

00:41:18.840 the transmission.

00:41:19.960 And that

00:41:20.320 might be what

00:41:20.840 they tested.

00:41:22.140 But since

00:41:22.660 the virus was

00:41:24.560 mutating

00:41:25.160 quickly,

00:41:26.820 a vaccination

00:41:27.900 has to be

00:41:28.600 sort of

00:41:29.320 perfect for

00:41:29.960 the virus

00:41:30.480 because a

00:41:32.080 virus will

00:41:33.660 mutate out

00:41:34.760 of, you

00:41:35.340 know, away

00:41:35.760 from the

00:41:36.100 vaccine so

00:41:36.800 quickly that

00:41:38.040 it's as if

00:41:39.280 there was no

00:41:39.760 immunity at

00:41:40.400 all.

00:41:42.140 So could

00:41:43.000 both of those

00:41:43.620 things be

00:41:44.080 true?

00:41:45.160 That in a

00:41:45.800 weird little

00:41:46.480 technical,

00:41:48.960 very temporary

00:41:49.980 time in

00:41:51.240 space, it

00:41:53.080 was 100%

00:41:53.920 effective,

00:41:54.900 but within

00:41:55.920 minutes, it

00:41:57.240 was zero

00:41:57.960 effective.

00:41:58.600 I'm going

00:41:59.360 to say

00:41:59.560 minutes just

00:42:00.260 to make

00:42:00.740 the point.

00:42:01.660 True.

00:42:03.280 Because I

00:42:04.000 do think if

00:42:04.780 they knew

00:42:05.100 exactly what

00:42:05.900 the virus

00:42:06.340 was, they

00:42:06.840 could make

00:42:07.280 a vaccine.

00:42:08.980 So that's

00:42:09.860 the fact

00:42:10.280 check.

00:42:11.460 Could you

00:42:11.860 make a

00:42:12.220 vaccine for

00:42:12.920 this if

00:42:13.520 the virus

00:42:14.000 never mutated?

00:42:15.540 I think the

00:42:16.140 answer is

00:42:16.480 yes.

00:42:18.160 I think the

00:42:18.660 answer is

00:42:18.980 yes.

00:42:19.380 And I

00:42:19.720 believe the

00:42:20.080 reason that

00:42:20.820 the researchers

00:42:22.940 said they'd

00:42:23.600 never be able

00:42:24.180 to make a

00:42:24.680 vaccine is

00:42:26.000 because of

00:42:26.300 the mutation.

00:42:27.840 I don't

00:42:28.540 believe anybody

00:42:29.400 ever said if

00:42:30.920 this virus never

00:42:31.820 changes, we

00:42:32.720 can't make a

00:42:33.280 vaccination.

00:42:34.600 Because I

00:42:34.920 think if it

00:42:35.300 never changes,

00:42:36.000 they can.

00:42:37.660 So I'm not

00:42:39.400 making a claim.

00:42:41.140 It's more of a

00:42:41.800 question.

00:42:42.840 But could that

00:42:43.680 explain why the

00:42:47.340 pharma companies

00:42:48.100 were claiming it

00:42:49.220 was 100%

00:42:49.860 effective?

00:42:50.460 Because remember,

00:42:51.480 it wasn't just

00:42:52.240 the pharma

00:42:52.720 companies.

00:42:53.760 It was other

00:42:54.420 people involved

00:42:55.160 and they were

00:42:55.460 making the

00:42:55.860 same claim.

00:42:57.220 So here's

00:42:59.300 what I think.

00:43:00.060 Here's my

00:43:00.760 current assumption.

00:43:03.720 Would you

00:43:04.320 agree with the

00:43:04.880 following statement

00:43:05.540 that the pharma

00:43:06.660 companies were

00:43:08.320 using motivated

00:43:09.700 analysis?

00:43:11.760 In other words,

00:43:12.300 they had to

00:43:12.580 analyze all this

00:43:13.920 data, but they

00:43:15.200 were motivated by

00:43:17.080 their own

00:43:17.620 objectives.

00:43:18.260 And so they

00:43:19.580 kind of saw

00:43:20.120 what they

00:43:20.380 wanted to see.

00:43:21.760 And even if

00:43:22.680 they knew they

00:43:23.220 should have

00:43:23.540 looked around

00:43:23.960 the corner,

00:43:25.840 they didn't.

00:43:28.260 It looks like a

00:43:29.220 motivated analysis.

00:43:31.360 Right?

00:43:31.660 Now, when I say

00:43:32.520 motivated, that

00:43:33.820 still leaves some

00:43:34.520 wiggle room about

00:43:35.440 whether there was

00:43:36.180 intent.

00:43:37.640 So I'm not

00:43:38.380 saying there was

00:43:40.020 illegal intent.

00:43:41.480 There might have

00:43:41.940 been.

00:43:42.700 I wouldn't rule

00:43:43.360 it out because

00:43:44.380 so much money was

00:43:45.200 involved, there

00:43:45.720 might have been

00:43:46.160 evil intent.

00:43:46.740 But there is a

00:43:51.300 thin explanation

00:43:53.720 that doesn't

00:43:55.640 require anybody

00:43:56.500 to have evil

00:43:57.080 intention.

00:43:58.100 And my problem

00:43:58.880 with this all

00:43:59.480 along is that so

00:44:00.980 many people were

00:44:01.800 involved, it would

00:44:02.640 be hard to imagine

00:44:03.520 they all had

00:44:04.560 financial intention.

00:44:07.420 But they all had

00:44:08.400 motivated reasoning.

00:44:10.200 They all had

00:44:11.000 motivated reasoning.

00:44:12.920 They wanted it to

00:44:14.060 work.

00:44:14.620 They wanted to be

00:44:15.420 heroes.

00:44:16.060 They wanted to

00:44:16.660 report it worked.

00:44:18.340 And everybody

00:44:19.200 wanted the pandemic

00:44:20.280 to end.

00:44:21.480 So I think it was

00:44:22.580 just wishful

00:44:23.160 thinking that

00:44:25.000 blinded them to

00:44:26.640 the obvious fact

00:44:27.760 that they should

00:44:28.460 have mentioned

00:44:28.900 the moment this

00:44:30.180 thing mutates,

00:44:31.640 the vaccine won't

00:44:32.900 work.

00:44:33.980 So all of these

00:44:36.160 people, by not

00:44:37.080 telling us directly,

00:44:38.780 this is what they

00:44:39.580 all should have

00:44:40.180 said in retrospect,

00:44:41.760 right?

00:44:42.060 Hindsight.

00:44:42.940 Hindsight makes us

00:44:43.860 all brilliant.

00:44:44.780 But in hindsight,

00:44:46.500 you wish they

00:44:47.120 had said, our

00:44:48.260 test shows it

00:44:49.240 really worked on

00:44:50.680 alpha, but we

00:44:52.380 don't think alpha

00:44:53.000 is going to last

00:44:53.580 long.

00:44:56.720 What do you

00:44:57.360 think?

00:44:59.240 I think that's

00:45:00.140 what they should

00:45:00.620 have said.

00:45:01.700 Because everybody

00:45:02.700 who worked on

00:45:03.660 these respiratory

00:45:04.480 viruses, I

00:45:06.240 believe every one

00:45:07.360 of them knew that

00:45:08.100 if it mutated,

00:45:10.280 the vaccine

00:45:11.200 wouldn't work.

00:45:11.720 they were just

00:45:12.700 hoping it would.

00:45:14.280 They were sort

00:45:14.800 of hoping that

00:45:16.720 if it didn't

00:45:17.580 mutate too

00:45:18.920 fast, and it

00:45:20.620 didn't mutate

00:45:21.300 too much, you

00:45:23.720 might be able to

00:45:24.500 get some purchase

00:45:25.960 on it.

00:45:26.780 But that was

00:45:27.480 motivated thinking.

00:45:29.440 There was nothing

00:45:30.260 to suggest that

00:45:31.600 that was going to

00:45:32.140 happen.

00:45:32.960 That was just

00:45:33.840 like optimism or

00:45:34.940 something.

00:45:36.220 So for sure,

00:45:38.900 we know that

00:45:39.540 they told us

00:45:40.100 things that were

00:45:40.660 not true, for

00:45:42.840 sure, we know

00:45:44.340 that they, meaning

00:45:45.040 pharma and the

00:45:45.840 governments, told

00:45:47.340 us things that

00:45:48.000 they should have

00:45:48.600 known were not

00:45:50.500 true.

00:45:51.600 That's where the

00:45:52.280 crime is, if there

00:45:54.320 is a crime.

00:45:55.300 That's where it

00:45:55.780 would be.

00:45:56.120 Would you agree?

00:45:57.240 Or do you believe

00:45:58.340 that they all knew

00:45:59.320 and they were just

00:45:59.860 playing it for the

00:46:00.460 money, like hundreds

00:46:01.800 of thousands of

00:46:02.700 researchers were all

00:46:03.640 in on it?

00:46:04.100 There probably

00:46:08.120 were a lot of

00:46:08.680 people in on it,

00:46:09.660 but I don't think

00:46:10.200 all of them.

00:46:14.540 My assumption

00:46:15.340 that they knew

00:46:16.160 it would mutate,

00:46:18.320 100% of the

00:46:19.320 people that I

00:46:20.120 heard ever talk

00:46:22.040 about it said

00:46:22.600 that, all of

00:46:23.880 them.

00:46:25.120 They all knew.

00:46:25.920 They all knew

00:46:26.600 because they'd

00:46:27.080 been trying for

00:46:27.640 years to make a

00:46:28.580 vaccine, and the

00:46:29.940 reason it didn't

00:46:30.600 work, it was

00:46:32.460 always the same

00:46:32.980 reason, because

00:46:33.900 it mutated, right?

00:46:35.040 They all knew

00:46:35.560 that.

00:46:36.180 Everybody in the

00:46:36.740 business knew it.

00:46:37.500 We didn't know

00:46:38.220 it, maybe.

00:46:40.760 I think even I

00:46:41.760 knew that.

00:46:45.840 Thomas Massey

00:46:46.660 makes a good

00:46:47.580 point, as he

00:46:48.640 often does.

00:46:51.480 So, you know,

00:46:52.220 you can't sue a

00:46:53.300 vaccine maker

00:46:54.200 because they have

00:46:55.940 special protection.

00:46:57.640 So if a company

00:46:58.320 makes a vaccine,

00:47:00.740 you can't sue

00:47:01.520 them if it goes

00:47:02.100 wrong.

00:47:04.360 But what if

00:47:05.140 they tell you

00:47:05.760 they're making

00:47:06.220 a vaccine, and

00:47:08.280 it doesn't stop

00:47:09.140 any transmission,

00:47:11.460 and they

00:47:11.960 probably knew

00:47:12.540 it?

00:47:14.120 Is that a

00:47:14.820 vaccine?

00:47:18.880 I'd say no.

00:47:20.960 And so,

00:47:21.520 therefore, I'd

00:47:22.080 say, if it's

00:47:23.740 not a vaccine,

00:47:24.720 then you can

00:47:25.260 sue them.

00:47:26.640 You can sue

00:47:27.400 them twice, once

00:47:28.380 for saying it's

00:47:28.980 a vaccine when

00:47:29.720 it's not, and

00:47:31.140 once because

00:47:31.880 somebody got

00:47:32.760 harmed, and

00:47:33.700 they didn't

00:47:33.960 have full

00:47:34.400 information.

00:47:35.920 But the

00:47:37.220 CDC apparently

00:47:38.280 evolved their

00:47:39.460 definition of a

00:47:40.460 vaccine during

00:47:42.140 the process.

00:47:43.500 So if you

00:47:44.720 were a vaccine,

00:47:45.580 you couldn't be

00:47:46.160 sued, but then

00:47:47.780 they made

00:47:48.140 something that

00:47:48.740 wasn't protective

00:47:49.840 of transmission.

00:47:51.620 And the

00:47:52.220 definition said

00:47:53.140 protective of

00:47:54.260 transmission.

00:47:54.760 So they

00:47:56.020 changed the

00:47:56.580 definition to

00:47:58.440 match what it

00:47:59.780 was doing, which

00:48:00.460 was protecting

00:48:01.520 people from bad

00:48:02.460 outcomes.

00:48:05.760 And then what

00:48:06.540 if it didn't do

00:48:07.080 that?

00:48:08.780 I'm not sure

00:48:09.560 that's the case.

00:48:10.660 But what if it

00:48:11.260 didn't?

00:48:12.360 So I think

00:48:13.260 Thomas Massey has

00:48:14.240 a real good

00:48:14.980 argument that I

00:48:15.800 would love to

00:48:16.340 see taken to

00:48:17.820 the Supreme

00:48:18.300 Court.

00:48:18.660 if it's only

00:48:21.500 legal because

00:48:22.480 it's a vaccine

00:48:23.680 by a

00:48:24.440 definition, and

00:48:25.660 then somebody

00:48:26.240 that you're

00:48:26.780 colluding with,

00:48:28.220 yes, colluding

00:48:29.380 with the CDC,

00:48:31.400 if the people

00:48:32.140 you're colluding

00:48:32.740 with change the

00:48:33.520 definition so

00:48:34.260 you stay

00:48:34.660 legal, is

00:48:37.560 that cool?

00:48:39.120 Is that cool?

00:48:40.540 I don't think

00:48:41.220 so.

00:48:42.000 I think I want

00:48:42.640 to see the

00:48:43.140 Supreme Court

00:48:43.800 work that out.

00:48:46.000 It's not obvious

00:48:46.820 to me if that's

00:48:47.640 necessarily illegal.

00:48:50.120 It's sketchy as

00:48:51.120 all hell.

00:48:52.460 But I'd like to

00:48:53.160 see, well, yeah.

00:48:55.200 I don't know if

00:48:55.700 lying is always

00:48:56.440 illegal, though.

00:48:59.420 Yeah, by the

00:49:00.160 time the vax

00:49:00.760 arrived, the

00:49:01.600 original screen

00:49:02.740 was already

00:49:03.200 dying out.

00:49:03.760 That is great.

00:49:07.220 I would like

00:49:08.020 to reiterate

00:49:09.840 something I say

00:49:10.780 once in a while,

00:49:11.460 but it's important

00:49:12.560 again.

00:49:13.940 I put this

00:49:14.760 under the

00:49:15.120 category of

00:49:16.240 youthful

00:49:16.980 dumbassery.

00:49:19.560 Was anyone

00:49:20.560 smart when

00:49:21.240 they were

00:49:21.480 young?

00:49:22.880 Was anybody

00:49:23.800 a genius until

00:49:24.600 they were 25

00:49:25.220 and then they

00:49:25.740 turned dumb?

00:49:27.160 I don't think

00:49:27.920 so.

00:49:29.460 So why do we

00:49:30.360 judge people by

00:49:31.400 what they said

00:49:31.980 in college?

00:49:33.580 So there's

00:49:34.480 another situation,

00:49:36.260 and I'm not

00:49:36.620 going to name

00:49:37.020 a name.

00:49:38.240 The reason I'm

00:49:39.100 not going to

00:49:39.480 name a name,

00:49:40.340 there's somebody

00:49:40.860 getting some

00:49:42.040 trouble for

00:49:42.500 something they

00:49:42.920 said at

00:49:43.240 college,

00:49:43.560 is that I

00:49:45.100 don't think

00:49:45.380 it's fair.

00:49:47.100 So don't

00:49:48.380 even Google

00:49:48.900 it.

00:49:50.140 Do me a

00:49:50.640 favor.

00:49:51.540 If you're

00:49:51.940 curious, who

00:49:52.680 are you

00:49:52.880 talking about?

00:49:53.400 Who is this

00:49:53.760 right?

00:49:53.980 Don't even

00:49:54.500 Google it.

00:49:55.820 Because we

00:49:57.120 should not be

00:49:57.800 judging people

00:49:58.460 by what they

00:49:58.960 did in college.

00:50:00.760 Unless it's

00:50:01.440 Greta, right?

00:50:03.460 Because she

00:50:03.980 was in college

00:50:04.500 when she was

00:50:04.920 doing it.

00:50:05.840 Or she was

00:50:06.540 that age.

00:50:06.920 So without

00:50:09.840 naming who

00:50:10.420 it was,

00:50:10.960 there's some

00:50:11.300 other person

00:50:12.140 who said

00:50:12.480 something super

00:50:14.380 inappropriate that

00:50:16.960 may or may not

00:50:18.180 have been in

00:50:18.920 an academic,

00:50:20.380 you know,

00:50:20.960 making a point

00:50:21.660 kind of context,

00:50:22.560 but it doesn't

00:50:23.080 matter.

00:50:24.000 Just whatever

00:50:24.820 they said under

00:50:25.640 the age of 25,

00:50:27.120 just let it go.

00:50:28.600 If people never

00:50:29.700 improved, then

00:50:31.640 yes, you should

00:50:32.680 judge them by

00:50:33.280 what they said

00:50:33.840 in college.

00:50:35.060 But if you

00:50:35.700 know that 100%

00:50:36.760 of people or

00:50:37.400 something close

00:50:38.020 to it,

00:50:38.980 evolve, you

00:50:40.700 know, we

00:50:40.920 evolve into

00:50:41.520 something different.

00:50:42.780 Might be better,

00:50:43.460 might be worse,

00:50:44.040 but it's a

00:50:44.380 different.

00:50:45.280 So why would

00:50:45.900 you judge

00:50:46.200 somebody today

00:50:46.880 by what a

00:50:47.820 different person

00:50:48.400 did?

00:50:49.120 You know,

00:50:49.320 somebody whose

00:50:49.720 brain wasn't

00:50:50.280 developed.

00:50:51.820 Anyway, I like

00:50:52.480 to say that

00:50:52.860 once in a while.

00:50:53.780 Now, there's

00:50:54.140 been a lot of

00:50:54.560 negativity in

00:50:55.220 the news,

00:50:55.620 and I thought

00:50:55.980 today, especially

00:50:56.800 because it's

00:50:57.200 Friday the 13th,

00:50:58.220 you needed some

00:50:58.900 positivity.

00:51:00.320 Would anybody

00:51:00.760 like some

00:51:01.240 positivity?

00:51:02.800 Because it's

00:51:03.440 all this negative

00:51:04.140 stuff.

00:51:04.980 Yeah, you need

00:51:05.820 some.

00:51:06.760 So I made a

00:51:07.240 little list, I

00:51:08.360 tweeted out

00:51:08.860 earlier, of

00:51:09.500 some positivity.

00:51:11.700 So on one

00:51:12.240 hand, the

00:51:12.740 COVID jabs

00:51:13.880 are, it looks

00:51:14.640 like they're

00:51:14.980 going to be

00:51:15.220 super overpriced.

00:51:17.520 Super overpriced.

00:51:18.620 In the context

00:51:19.740 of we already

00:51:20.980 have inflation,

00:51:22.540 and then these

00:51:23.240 jabs are going

00:51:24.480 to go to

00:51:25.000 like 400%

00:51:26.440 what they used

00:51:27.040 to be, etc.

00:51:27.660 But, on the

00:51:31.000 plus side,

00:51:32.100 apparently you

00:51:32.580 don't need

00:51:32.920 them.

00:51:35.360 So it

00:51:36.520 doesn't really

00:51:37.300 matter what

00:51:38.060 it costs

00:51:38.760 if you don't

00:51:40.380 need it.

00:51:42.540 Now, I'm

00:51:43.240 not giving you

00:51:44.140 medical advice.

00:51:45.640 You're not

00:51:46.040 getting any

00:51:46.500 medical advice

00:51:47.180 from me.

00:51:47.420 I'm not telling

00:51:47.900 you not to

00:51:48.360 take it.

00:51:49.080 I'm just

00:51:49.580 saying it's

00:51:50.060 literally true

00:51:50.760 that the price

00:51:51.320 is going up

00:51:51.840 400% at the

00:51:53.380 time that the

00:51:53.920 utility is down

00:51:54.800 about 1,000%.

00:51:55.800 So if the

00:51:58.100 price is going

00:51:58.760 up as the

00:52:00.060 usefulness is

00:52:00.820 dropping like

00:52:01.400 a rock, I

00:52:03.660 don't know

00:52:03.940 that that's

00:52:04.320 entirely bad

00:52:05.040 news.

00:52:05.760 I don't care

00:52:06.440 what it costs

00:52:07.040 because I'm

00:52:07.420 never going

00:52:07.740 to get it.

00:52:10.940 Backpedaling.

00:52:13.160 I'd like to

00:52:13.900 ask you,

00:52:14.360 coach, let

00:52:15.260 me ask, I'm

00:52:16.020 going to talk

00:52:16.340 to coach

00:52:16.780 here.

00:52:17.040 Coach, what

00:52:19.800 I like to

00:52:20.320 do is base

00:52:22.520 my decisions

00:52:23.480 on the

00:52:24.120 knowledge that

00:52:24.720 I have.

00:52:25.620 And then

00:52:25.980 if the

00:52:26.940 data changes

00:52:27.780 or we

00:52:28.380 learn more,

00:52:29.640 sometimes I

00:52:31.180 will modify

00:52:31.980 my opinion

00:52:32.900 to fit the

00:52:34.360 new data

00:52:35.080 which refuted

00:52:36.540 my old

00:52:36.980 opinion.

00:52:38.680 Now, I

00:52:40.060 know that

00:52:40.400 you call

00:52:40.740 that flip

00:52:41.400 flopping

00:52:42.040 and back

00:52:42.760 pedaling and

00:52:43.820 walking it

00:52:44.400 back.

00:52:45.480 But I'm a

00:52:45.960 little bit

00:52:46.320 curious how

00:52:46.900 you play

00:52:47.380 it.

00:52:48.560 When you

00:52:49.360 have an

00:52:50.100 opinion and

00:52:50.820 then the

00:52:51.260 information is

00:52:52.360 updated to

00:52:53.520 show that

00:52:53.860 your original

00:52:54.440 opinion makes

00:52:55.860 you look

00:52:56.240 like a

00:52:57.320 monkey, do

00:52:58.860 you say to

00:52:59.240 yourself, you

00:53:00.320 know, I was

00:53:00.820 pretty comfortable

00:53:01.480 with looking

00:53:01.980 like a

00:53:02.360 monkey.

00:53:03.280 I think

00:53:03.920 I'll ride

00:53:05.060 that horse.

00:53:06.760 Monkey horse.

00:53:07.660 Got too many

00:53:08.100 metaphors in

00:53:08.640 there.

00:53:09.420 But do you

00:53:10.800 keep your

00:53:11.180 opinion just

00:53:11.780 the same?

00:53:13.100 Or do you

00:53:13.920 say, and

00:53:15.460 I'll bet you

00:53:17.180 do this,

00:53:18.300 coach, I

00:53:19.540 feel like you're

00:53:20.100 this kind of

00:53:20.580 person.

00:53:20.860 I think

00:53:22.000 you're the

00:53:22.320 kind of

00:53:22.600 person who

00:53:23.040 can go

00:53:23.420 into a

00:53:23.920 fog of

00:53:24.500 war where

00:53:25.780 none of

00:53:26.420 the data

00:53:26.920 is reliable

00:53:29.060 and you

00:53:30.240 can have

00:53:30.620 certainty

00:53:31.100 from the

00:53:32.260 first moment.

00:53:33.860 And then,

00:53:34.760 based on that

00:53:35.560 certainty, it

00:53:36.580 really wouldn't

00:53:37.180 matter how

00:53:37.860 much the

00:53:38.320 information

00:53:38.840 changed, you

00:53:40.220 could keep

00:53:40.580 that same

00:53:41.300 opinion.

00:53:42.600 Because you

00:53:43.380 were certain

00:53:43.940 even when

00:53:44.960 there was no

00:53:45.380 information.

00:53:45.880 So, coach, is

00:53:50.060 that how you

00:53:50.420 play it?

00:53:51.920 Because, you

00:53:52.420 know, there

00:53:52.680 are a lot of

00:53:53.000 us who are

00:53:53.340 playing it the

00:53:53.880 dumb old way

00:53:54.700 where if the

00:53:55.620 data changes,

00:53:56.540 we'll update

00:53:57.060 our opinions.

00:53:58.000 But not you.

00:53:59.400 No, no.

00:54:00.060 You've got a

00:54:00.500 progressive kind

00:54:02.220 of a clopper

00:54:04.000 kind of opinion

00:54:04.780 where the

00:54:05.720 change in the

00:54:06.460 data should not

00:54:07.320 have any

00:54:08.020 difference to

00:54:09.600 your opinion.

00:54:11.880 Yeah.

00:54:12.800 You could,

00:54:13.460 it's cheating,

00:54:14.700 as somebody

00:54:15.080 says.

00:54:15.420 Yeah, it's

00:54:15.740 cheating, to

00:54:16.700 update your

00:54:17.720 opinion with

00:54:18.220 new information.

00:54:19.780 I hate to

00:54:20.260 do that.

00:54:20.760 All right.

00:54:21.300 Here's some

00:54:21.800 more positivity.

00:54:24.980 If you have

00:54:25.680 a son who's

00:54:26.440 a little bit

00:54:26.920 too rambunctious,

00:54:28.680 in the old

00:54:29.520 days, what

00:54:30.020 could you do

00:54:30.440 about it?

00:54:32.380 Nothing.

00:54:33.540 I mean, I

00:54:33.920 guess in the

00:54:34.300 old, old

00:54:34.640 days, you

00:54:35.020 could, like,

00:54:36.020 use corporal

00:54:36.740 punishment.

00:54:38.040 But, you

00:54:38.540 know, you

00:54:38.720 can't do that

00:54:39.200 anymore.

00:54:40.240 So, what

00:54:40.840 could you do?

00:54:41.880 If you had a

00:54:42.560 rambunctious

00:54:43.140 son, there's

00:54:43.700 nothing you'd

00:54:44.180 do.

00:54:44.380 But now,

00:54:44.820 on the

00:54:45.920 plus side,

00:54:46.520 you can

00:54:46.900 legally remove

00:54:47.640 their balls.

00:54:50.000 I'm no

00:54:50.540 doctor, but I

00:54:51.300 think that

00:54:51.660 calms them

00:54:52.120 down.

00:54:53.800 That'll settle

00:54:54.500 you down a

00:54:54.940 little bit.

00:54:55.480 Now, you

00:54:55.900 can't remove

00:54:56.540 their balls

00:54:57.060 unless they

00:54:58.760 want you to,

00:55:00.120 right?

00:55:00.400 Even though

00:55:00.760 they're children,

00:55:01.600 they still get

00:55:02.280 a vote.

00:55:03.160 So, you

00:55:03.740 can't really

00:55:04.160 go to your

00:55:04.720 son and say,

00:55:05.260 hey, I was

00:55:06.020 thinking of

00:55:06.520 removing your

00:55:07.100 balls and

00:55:07.580 transitioning you

00:55:08.460 to a woman

00:55:08.940 because it'd be

00:55:10.600 easier for me.

00:55:11.280 now, the

00:55:14.260 kid might

00:55:14.660 say, whoa,

00:55:16.040 whoa, whoa,

00:55:16.400 I'm totally

00:55:17.820 a boy, and

00:55:19.160 I have no

00:55:19.660 interest whatsoever

00:55:20.380 in transitioning.

00:55:21.260 But here's the

00:55:21.700 good part.

00:55:23.140 Children can

00:55:24.540 be hypnotized

00:55:25.600 really easily.

00:55:27.060 It's a real

00:55:27.560 thing.

00:55:28.300 When you learn

00:55:28.920 to be a

00:55:29.200 hypnotist, one

00:55:30.540 of the things

00:55:30.980 you learn is

00:55:31.580 children, you

00:55:33.100 don't even have

00:55:33.660 to work at

00:55:34.180 it.

00:55:35.380 You could

00:55:36.340 say two

00:55:37.140 sentences and

00:55:37.900 make a kid

00:55:38.380 hallucinate.

00:55:38.940 It's very

00:55:39.560 easy.

00:55:40.560 So, you

00:55:41.500 can convince

00:55:42.480 your child of

00:55:44.320 really anything.

00:55:45.480 Children are

00:55:45.940 sort of a

00:55:46.380 blank slate.

00:55:47.540 You can just

00:55:48.340 work on them.

00:55:49.260 So, if your

00:55:50.200 son is too

00:55:50.680 rambunctious, even

00:55:52.300 though it would

00:55:52.600 be totally

00:55:53.040 unethical, you

00:55:54.500 could probably

00:55:54.880 convince him to

00:55:55.660 have his balls

00:55:56.320 removed if he

00:55:56.980 worked at it

00:55:57.420 long enough.

00:55:58.260 So, that's the

00:55:58.860 good news.

00:56:00.600 Here's the more

00:56:01.260 good news.

00:56:01.920 Things could be

00:56:02.680 much worse.

00:56:04.500 Things could be

00:56:05.240 much worse.

00:56:05.760 For example, you

00:56:07.620 could live in

00:56:08.140 Canada.

00:56:08.940 I mean, it

00:56:13.360 could be worse.

00:56:14.860 It could be

00:56:15.300 worse.

00:56:16.540 Number four, again,

00:56:18.860 in the context of

00:56:20.640 inflation, wouldn't

00:56:24.200 you like to know

00:56:24.920 that some prices

00:56:25.640 are coming down?

00:56:26.740 And they are.

00:56:27.560 And they are.

00:56:27.960 For example,

00:56:28.720 fentanyl, because of

00:56:31.780 supply and demand,

00:56:32.960 the supply is

00:56:33.720 through the roof.

00:56:34.960 So, the price of

00:56:35.960 fentanyl, totally

00:56:37.020 reasonable.

00:56:37.560 And nobody talks

00:56:39.380 about that.

00:56:40.720 That's good for

00:56:41.320 inflation.

00:56:43.160 I don't think when

00:56:43.940 they calculate the

00:56:44.720 inflation, they

00:56:45.340 include the price of

00:56:46.240 fentanyl.

00:56:47.080 If they did, I

00:56:47.880 think it would

00:56:48.480 look a lot better.

00:56:49.580 Look a lot better.

00:56:53.240 Bad news.

00:56:54.080 Here's some more

00:56:54.500 good news.

00:56:55.140 Do you remember

00:56:55.540 when bad news used

00:56:57.100 to be all there was

00:56:58.000 on the news?

00:56:58.580 Like, if there was

00:57:00.400 something bad

00:57:01.040 happening, you turn

00:57:01.840 on the news, you

00:57:02.500 look, oh, it's like

00:57:03.760 a fire hose, all

00:57:04.940 this bad news coming

00:57:06.060 at me.

00:57:06.780 But now, fully 50%

00:57:10.540 of all the bad

00:57:11.600 political news is

00:57:13.800 suppressed.

00:57:16.320 Well, that's an

00:57:17.000 upgrade.

00:57:17.880 You only have to

00:57:18.640 hear half of the

00:57:19.320 bad news.

00:57:20.540 It's all about

00:57:21.300 Republicans.

00:57:22.240 But all of the

00:57:23.640 bad news about

00:57:24.280 Democrats, suppressed.

00:57:26.340 You never even

00:57:27.480 have to see it.

00:57:28.300 And that feels

00:57:28.780 good.

00:57:29.600 That's like a, it's

00:57:31.200 better than that

00:57:31.860 Andrew Huberman

00:57:33.580 breathing technique.

00:57:35.100 It just makes you

00:57:35.860 feel good.

00:57:38.920 And then, of

00:57:40.080 course, some of

00:57:42.100 you were worried

00:57:42.800 about some of our

00:57:44.520 national secrets

00:57:45.340 getting out, because

00:57:46.100 you heard about

00:57:46.540 Mar-a-Lago.

00:57:48.120 Mar-a-Lago, maybe

00:57:49.620 those national

00:57:50.500 secrets might get

00:57:51.340 out.

00:57:52.280 But these days, much

00:57:55.700 better situation.

00:57:57.340 So we don't have

00:57:58.260 Mar-a-Lago, now we

00:57:59.480 have Car-a-Lago.

00:58:02.580 Car-a-Lago.

00:58:03.620 That was Jesse

00:58:04.220 Waters' joke.

00:58:05.180 It was pretty good.

00:58:07.160 Car-a-Lago.

00:58:08.780 And our nation's

00:58:10.900 secrets are safe in

00:58:12.660 the bins next to

00:58:13.980 Joe's Corvette in

00:58:15.400 his garage.

00:58:16.940 So that's a lot of

00:58:18.040 good news.

00:58:18.600 And people don't

00:58:19.200 report the good

00:58:19.840 news.

00:58:20.600 I feel that

00:58:21.480 that's good.

00:58:24.700 Now, do you

00:58:28.800 think that the

00:58:29.380 headlines are all

00:58:30.800 organic, or do

00:58:31.960 you think that

00:58:32.640 we're always being

00:58:33.760 played?

00:58:35.800 What do you

00:58:36.540 think?

00:58:37.200 Do you think our

00:58:37.780 headlines are

00:58:38.360 organic, or are

00:58:40.100 we always being

00:58:41.220 played?

00:58:42.600 You're always being

00:58:43.280 played.

00:58:44.760 Because the

00:58:47.020 headlines could be

00:58:47.760 anything.

00:58:49.160 The headlines about

00:58:50.040 any politician could

00:58:51.360 be positive or

00:58:52.140 negative.

00:58:52.980 Could be anything.

00:58:53.540 So whoever

00:58:54.460 chooses the

00:58:55.120 headlines, you

00:58:56.620 know, they're

00:58:58.120 presenting a

00:58:59.180 narrative.

00:59:00.880 Interestingly, here's

00:59:03.360 a pro-vaccine

00:59:04.620 story, but not

00:59:05.540 about COVID.

00:59:06.540 Not about COVID.

00:59:08.280 So Wall Street

00:59:08.960 Journal has a

00:59:09.700 pro-vaccine

00:59:10.480 story about the

00:59:11.820 HPV vaccine, which

00:59:14.720 they say has been a

00:59:16.660 big part of

00:59:17.300 dropping U.S.

00:59:18.340 cancer mortality

00:59:19.540 by a pretty big

00:59:23.800 amount, like down

00:59:25.000 by a third or

00:59:25.640 something.

00:59:26.960 And it's

00:59:30.280 because of the

00:59:31.280 vaccine.

00:59:33.780 Do you see it?

00:59:36.040 Let me ask you

00:59:36.820 this.

00:59:38.020 Would there have

00:59:38.980 been a pro-

00:59:40.180 vaccine story if

00:59:42.460 we were not

00:59:43.080 questioning the

00:59:43.880 vaccinations about

00:59:44.780 COVID?

00:59:45.080 Isn't it

00:59:46.540 interesting that

00:59:47.180 there would be

00:59:47.460 this totally

00:59:48.740 unrelated story

00:59:49.880 that just happens

00:59:51.440 to highlight the

00:59:52.920 magical abilities of

00:59:54.200 vaccinations?

00:59:55.660 At just the time

00:59:56.660 the public is

00:59:57.720 starting to

00:59:58.240 question the

00:59:59.540 value of the

01:00:00.320 COVID vaccinations,

01:00:02.040 huh, the Wall

01:00:03.000 Street Journal has

01:00:03.740 a nice pro-

01:00:05.560 vaccination story.

01:00:07.540 Just a

01:00:08.260 coincidence?

01:00:08.540 Maybe, maybe, but

01:00:13.800 maybe not, maybe

01:00:15.500 not.

01:00:16.260 Yeah, it's

01:00:16.660 plausible that it's

01:00:17.460 a coincidence.

01:00:18.660 That is

01:00:19.040 plausible.

01:00:19.840 But in today's

01:00:20.940 environment, it's a

01:00:22.640 little harder to

01:00:23.320 assume that that's

01:00:24.160 the case, right?

01:00:27.980 But I'm glad

01:00:28.820 cancer's down.

01:00:32.460 There's been a

01:00:33.380 special counsel

01:00:35.000 has been named

01:00:37.040 to look into

01:00:38.980 the news that

01:00:41.700 Joe Biden has

01:00:42.760 a bunch of

01:00:43.400 several cases

01:00:45.680 of confidential

01:00:46.700 information.

01:00:47.680 Two for sure,

01:00:48.580 maybe some

01:00:49.100 third one.

01:00:50.600 And so they got

01:00:51.200 a special counsel

01:00:52.040 to look into

01:00:52.580 that.

01:00:53.420 My biggest

01:00:54.220 problem with

01:00:55.020 the special

01:00:55.400 counsel is I

01:00:56.140 don't know this

01:00:57.000 person's pronouns.

01:00:59.400 And it's a

01:00:59.760 little confusing

01:01:00.380 because the

01:01:01.220 person's name is

01:01:02.780 Robert Hur,

01:01:04.400 spelled H-U-R.

01:01:05.720 I think his

01:01:07.500 pronouns are him

01:01:08.580 and her, H-U-R.

01:01:11.320 That's the way I'd

01:01:12.060 go.

01:01:13.380 I'd go with my

01:01:15.360 pronouns are him

01:01:16.240 and her.

01:01:17.920 Yeah, that's how I'd

01:01:18.820 go.

01:01:19.380 But we don't

01:01:19.820 know.

01:01:23.340 And I also ask

01:01:24.280 myself if Robert

01:01:25.880 Hur married Dean

01:01:28.380 Cain's sister.

01:01:29.880 I don't know if he

01:01:30.500 has a sister and I

01:01:31.580 don't know if her

01:01:32.020 last name would be

01:01:32.680 Cain if she's

01:01:33.240 single.

01:01:33.940 But it's funny.

01:01:34.600 Just go with

01:01:35.220 this.

01:01:36.300 And they

01:01:36.860 hyphenated the

01:01:37.600 names of the

01:01:38.120 kids.

01:01:38.600 They would be

01:01:39.200 Hurricane.

01:01:41.420 Hurricane.

01:01:43.380 And I wondered

01:01:44.160 what would be the

01:01:44.920 funniest first name

01:01:46.480 to go with a

01:01:47.720 last name of

01:01:48.520 Hurricane.

01:01:50.560 I was thinking

01:01:51.340 Wendy.

01:01:53.380 Wendy.

01:01:55.200 How's that

01:01:55.780 Hurricane?

01:01:56.240 Well, it's

01:01:56.480 pretty Wendy.

01:01:57.620 It's pretty Wendy

01:01:58.260 out there in that

01:01:58.820 Hurricane.

01:01:59.080 Yeah.

01:02:01.300 Or how about

01:02:02.240 Ima?

01:02:05.240 Yeah, Ima Hurricane.

01:02:06.740 Yeah.

01:02:07.660 Killer.

01:02:08.400 Stormy.

01:02:08.760 Stormy.

01:02:09.860 Stormy Hurricane.

01:02:11.920 There you go.

01:02:12.500 Stormy Daniels.

01:02:14.340 Stormy Hurricane.

01:02:16.380 Camille.

01:02:18.320 Yeah.

01:02:19.320 Okay, Kansas.

01:02:20.300 I don't think

01:02:20.820 Betsy's that.

01:02:21.540 Why do people say

01:02:22.340 Betsy?

01:02:22.740 Is that funny?

01:02:25.780 Herder.

01:02:27.300 Herder.

01:02:28.760 All right, well,

01:02:30.000 Robert Herr is

01:02:30.780 going to look into

01:02:31.320 it, and so that

01:02:33.260 should take care of

01:02:33.940 it, right?

01:02:34.300 The good news is

01:02:35.240 that an objective

01:02:36.800 person has been put

01:02:38.600 in charge so that

01:02:39.520 we can...

01:02:40.180 What?

01:02:42.080 He's not?

01:02:43.840 What?

01:02:45.200 Oh, according to

01:02:46.740 Kash Patel, Robert

01:02:49.020 Herr is a, quote,

01:02:50.160 swamp monster who

01:02:52.040 was involved with

01:02:53.660 the Russia collusion

01:02:56.020 hoax.

01:02:58.880 Literally, the worst

01:03:01.660 person in the world

01:03:03.040 to be in charge of

01:03:04.940 this.

01:03:05.780 The worst person.

01:03:07.800 Okay.

01:03:08.960 Now, the left says

01:03:10.400 that this person

01:03:11.060 was appointed by

01:03:11.900 Trump.

01:03:14.260 Isn't this sort of

01:03:15.140 normal to have

01:03:16.140 lower-level people

01:03:17.240 approved by a

01:03:18.060 president, and the

01:03:19.500 president has no

01:03:20.240 idea who they are?

01:03:21.220 They could be the

01:03:21.760 other party.

01:03:22.840 I mean, it's lower-level

01:03:23.720 people.

01:03:24.160 It doesn't matter.

01:03:24.660 Does it?

01:03:26.680 Isn't it common for

01:03:28.600 people to get

01:03:30.080 nominated who are

01:03:31.320 not necessarily your

01:03:32.160 same party?

01:03:33.400 So I don't think that

01:03:34.160 means anything.

01:03:36.440 But it does look like

01:03:37.540 the fix is in, and

01:03:39.300 he looks like he'll be

01:03:40.080 the fixer for this.

01:03:43.540 Do you remember I was

01:03:44.880 telling you that it

01:03:45.780 looks like the

01:03:47.380 Democrats are trying

01:03:48.300 to take Biden out with

01:03:49.460 this document thing?

01:03:50.680 Do you remember me

01:03:52.060 saying that?

01:03:53.620 And I even put a

01:03:55.620 hashtag conspiracy

01:03:56.600 theory, because when

01:03:58.020 I said it, I thought,

01:03:59.000 okay, I know I'm going

01:04:00.660 a little too far here.

01:04:01.880 So I called it out as

01:04:03.340 my own conspiracy

01:04:04.140 theory.

01:04:04.800 And then I turned on

01:04:05.760 Tucker Carlson, and he

01:04:07.800 says it directly.

01:04:10.480 He just says it

01:04:11.440 directly.

01:04:11.760 So it does look like

01:04:16.880 the Democrats are

01:04:17.820 trying to take Biden

01:04:18.620 out.

01:04:19.260 It actually does look

01:04:20.320 like that.

01:04:21.380 Now, that doesn't

01:04:22.020 mean it's true, but

01:04:23.940 that hypothesis fits

01:04:25.980 everything we see.

01:04:28.340 The other hypothesis is

01:04:30.140 it's just business as

01:04:31.140 normal.

01:04:31.960 So you have the other

01:04:33.080 possibility.

01:04:36.620 But I ask this

01:04:38.180 question.

01:04:38.540 Can documents be

01:04:40.080 fingerprinted?

01:04:42.080 Because wouldn't you

01:04:43.180 want to know who's

01:04:44.240 touched those

01:04:44.960 confidential documents?

01:04:47.460 Wouldn't you like to

01:04:48.400 know?

01:04:49.500 And doesn't that make

01:04:51.180 a big difference?

01:04:53.780 What if you see

01:04:54.820 Hunter's fingerprints

01:04:55.900 on them?

01:04:58.840 That's a problem.

01:05:01.100 Do you think

01:05:01.540 Hunter's fingerprints

01:05:02.360 will be on any of

01:05:03.160 those documents?

01:05:06.200 I don't know.

01:05:07.200 There was a reason

01:05:08.120 that they were not

01:05:09.020 where they were

01:05:09.700 supposed to be.

01:05:11.400 Maybe it's an

01:05:12.180 accident.

01:05:13.420 Maybe not.

01:05:14.620 We'll see.

01:05:15.700 But here's what I

01:05:17.180 would look for.

01:05:18.560 If they do not

01:05:19.800 fingerprint the

01:05:20.660 documents, the fix

01:05:22.200 is in.

01:05:24.020 Can you agree on

01:05:24.880 that?

01:05:25.600 If they don't

01:05:26.620 fingerprint the

01:05:27.500 documents, then you

01:05:28.880 can know for sure

01:05:29.580 that it's just a

01:05:30.340 cover-up operation.

01:05:32.560 If they do

01:05:33.360 fingerprint them, you

01:05:34.460 can still wonder if

01:05:35.140 they told you the

01:05:35.740 truth.

01:05:36.620 But if they do

01:05:37.340 fingerprint them,

01:05:38.120 and they find

01:05:39.160 Hunter's fingerprints

01:05:40.360 on them, then I'm

01:05:41.820 willing, just as one

01:05:43.200 example, it could be

01:05:43.920 someone else.

01:05:44.720 But I'd be willing

01:05:46.740 to say, oh, that

01:05:47.660 looks like they

01:05:48.860 might actually be

01:05:49.560 serious about this.

01:05:50.960 Which would also

01:05:51.800 suggest the Democrats

01:05:52.820 are out to get rid

01:05:54.480 of Biden.

01:05:55.680 Here's my take on

01:05:56.780 Biden.

01:05:57.760 I think that Biden

01:05:58.780 was helped into his

01:06:01.300 election by lots of

01:06:03.140 powerful people behind

01:06:04.460 the scenes.

01:06:04.960 And then he came to

01:06:07.100 believe that the job

01:06:08.020 was his, and it was

01:06:09.340 totally up to him

01:06:10.160 whether he runs for

01:06:10.960 re-election.

01:06:12.600 So he said, yeah,

01:06:14.840 going to run for

01:06:15.400 re-election.

01:06:16.520 I don't believe that

01:06:18.000 the people who

01:06:18.720 installed him are

01:06:20.000 necessarily on the

01:06:20.900 same team.

01:06:21.920 And I think they

01:06:22.700 might need to take

01:06:23.420 him out, because he's

01:06:25.040 an old man who just

01:06:26.020 claims he should

01:06:26.960 stay.

01:06:27.240 So, have you

01:06:35.000 noticed that even

01:06:35.900 CNN is creating

01:06:37.020 this, CNN is

01:06:39.220 treating the Biden

01:06:41.460 documents like it's

01:06:44.240 as important as

01:06:45.040 Mar-a-Lago, and

01:06:47.080 it's the top story.

01:06:48.880 It's actually their

01:06:49.720 top story.

01:06:51.120 An anti-Democrat

01:06:53.380 story is CNN's

01:06:55.840 top story.

01:06:57.240 Does that mean

01:06:59.060 that CNN has

01:06:59.940 successfully, you

01:07:01.860 know, pivoted to

01:07:02.660 the middle, at least

01:07:03.400 on this story?

01:07:04.880 Or does it mean

01:07:06.160 that the signal is

01:07:08.180 that the Democrats

01:07:09.180 need to get rid of

01:07:10.200 Biden?

01:07:11.540 It doesn't mean

01:07:12.400 they had a meeting

01:07:13.060 and they colluded.

01:07:13.960 It could be just

01:07:14.500 everybody's on the

01:07:15.180 same page, so they

01:07:16.060 all know what to

01:07:16.580 do.

01:07:18.000 Yeah.

01:07:18.440 It does, it's a

01:07:19.460 little bit

01:07:19.820 suspicious.

01:07:21.420 I would expect

01:07:22.340 CNN to do a

01:07:23.340 whole bunch more

01:07:24.120 of minimizing it,

01:07:25.280 and they're not.

01:07:27.240 They're actually

01:07:27.820 maximizing it.

01:07:30.660 So it does look

01:07:32.400 like the fix is in,

01:07:33.780 but not necessarily.

01:07:37.440 All right, there's

01:07:37.980 not much to be said

01:07:39.080 about the fact that

01:07:39.840 the documents were

01:07:40.640 in a garage parked

01:07:42.000 next to a car.

01:07:44.080 You know, we can

01:07:44.500 make all the jokes

01:07:45.180 about how secure

01:07:45.900 that was or

01:07:46.500 wasn't, whatever.

01:07:47.140 Here's a story that

01:07:51.480 might be fake, but it

01:07:56.080 might be fake and

01:07:57.260 also tell us

01:07:58.060 something.

01:07:59.100 So I'm going to

01:07:59.880 say the odds of

01:08:01.060 this being true are

01:08:02.420 low, but the odds

01:08:04.260 of it meeting

01:08:04.800 something important

01:08:05.640 are very high.

01:08:07.180 And what I saw was

01:08:08.540 just one social

01:08:09.820 media account, so

01:08:11.980 it's not in the

01:08:12.940 regular news.

01:08:13.720 So at the

01:08:15.060 moment, the regular

01:08:16.080 news is not

01:08:16.800 reporting this, so

01:08:17.860 it might not be

01:08:18.400 true.

01:08:19.620 But there are

01:08:20.980 Wagner soldiers who

01:08:22.300 videotaped what they

01:08:23.980 claim are captured

01:08:25.240 Ukrainian drones that

01:08:27.540 are clearly outfitted

01:08:28.720 for chemical warfare,

01:08:31.220 meaning they have

01:08:31.880 tanks on them that

01:08:33.020 obviously are meant

01:08:34.560 to hold a chemical

01:08:36.180 or a gas.

01:08:37.720 They wouldn't have

01:08:38.480 any other reason to

01:08:39.300 be there.

01:08:39.580 And it's a bunch

01:08:40.560 of them.

01:08:41.300 It's like a room

01:08:42.120 full of drones,

01:08:43.940 small ones, that

01:08:45.000 have been modified

01:08:45.560 to carry some kind

01:08:46.380 of a gas canister.

01:08:49.500 Now, the Wagner

01:08:50.780 group claims, you

01:08:52.000 know, that they've

01:08:52.760 been used.

01:08:54.260 Now, here's the

01:08:55.140 thing.

01:08:56.740 Do you believe the

01:08:57.760 Wagner group?

01:08:58.860 No.

01:08:59.920 No.

01:09:01.000 No, you shouldn't

01:09:01.640 believe anything that

01:09:02.400 comes out of Ukraine.

01:09:04.040 But here's the only

01:09:04.980 thing I wonder.

01:09:06.780 Were the drones

01:09:07.600 real?

01:09:07.940 Do you think they

01:09:09.800 faked it by making

01:09:11.060 a whole room full of

01:09:12.700 drones that have

01:09:13.960 canisters attached?

01:09:15.540 Because that would

01:09:15.980 be a lot of work.

01:09:17.800 If you were planning

01:09:19.260 to fake it, how many

01:09:21.300 do you need?

01:09:23.480 You only need one.

01:09:25.860 You literally just

01:09:26.660 need one.

01:09:27.160 Because it would be

01:09:27.840 just as convincing as

01:09:29.160 a room full.

01:09:30.460 Because if you saw

01:09:31.240 one and you believed

01:09:32.060 it was real, you'd

01:09:33.060 think there were

01:09:33.600 more.

01:09:34.760 You know, you would

01:09:35.240 never believe there

01:09:35.940 was only one.

01:09:36.720 So if it were

01:09:38.220 fake, they only

01:09:39.740 need to show you

01:09:40.300 one.

01:09:42.060 Now, I believe it

01:09:43.900 is fake, but maybe

01:09:45.640 not for the reasons

01:09:46.700 that the drones are

01:09:48.460 not real.

01:09:49.440 It could be fake in

01:09:51.440 the sense that it's

01:09:52.300 Wagner's own drones.

01:09:54.280 It could be that the

01:09:55.380 Wagner group is the

01:09:56.860 one with making the

01:09:57.900 gas drones.

01:09:59.240 And since they're

01:09:59.840 definitely going to

01:10:00.540 get caught, what they

01:10:02.560 did was say, oh,

01:10:03.780 look at these

01:10:04.260 Ukrainians.

01:10:04.880 So if you ever see

01:10:05.640 one, the first time

01:10:07.660 you ever find one

01:10:08.480 that crashed, you're

01:10:10.720 going to say, oh,

01:10:11.260 the Wagner group

01:10:12.020 warned us about

01:10:12.760 this.

01:10:13.020 These are those

01:10:13.600 Ukrainian drones.

01:10:16.580 So this could be

01:10:18.140 the Wagner group

01:10:19.120 getting in front of

01:10:19.940 a story they know

01:10:20.740 is going to break,

01:10:22.060 the sooner or later

01:10:22.880 somebody's going to

01:10:23.540 find a drone with

01:10:24.260 a canister on it.

01:10:25.920 And so they're

01:10:26.620 making the case that

01:10:27.540 it's the other guys

01:10:28.280 before it happens.

01:10:29.960 That's what it

01:10:30.540 looks like.

01:10:30.940 But there's a

01:10:33.120 bigger question.

01:10:35.740 If those drones

01:10:36.780 are real, and

01:10:38.860 again, I don't

01:10:39.600 know why you

01:10:40.000 would have so

01:10:40.540 many of them.

01:10:41.260 If you're going

01:10:41.580 to fake it, you

01:10:42.120 don't need that

01:10:42.580 many.

01:10:43.200 It would be a

01:10:43.720 weird way to

01:10:44.220 fake it.

01:10:45.960 If those are

01:10:46.740 real, that's

01:10:47.240 what's coming.

01:10:48.740 And my book,

01:10:50.500 The Religion

01:10:50.960 War, written

01:10:51.840 in 2003, I

01:10:53.580 think, predicted

01:10:54.980 this.

01:10:55.700 And it's

01:10:56.040 predicted based

01:10:56.800 on the following

01:10:57.580 technology predictions.

01:11:00.940 that drones

01:11:01.780 would be

01:11:02.300 widespread and

01:11:04.480 hobby-sized.

01:11:07.600 That, you

01:11:07.860 know, regular

01:11:08.560 people could get

01:11:09.340 a drone that

01:11:09.980 could do a

01:11:10.440 lot of stuff.

01:11:11.340 So that, I

01:11:12.200 predicted in 2003,

01:11:13.580 that came true.

01:11:14.500 The other thing

01:11:15.300 I predicted is

01:11:16.980 that because the

01:11:18.400 drone won't be

01:11:19.220 able to carry a

01:11:19.920 lot of weight,

01:11:21.460 it's going to

01:11:22.420 want to use

01:11:22.940 weapons that

01:11:23.660 don't weigh

01:11:24.120 much.

01:11:25.420 And the

01:11:25.800 ultimate weapon

01:11:26.620 that doesn't

01:11:27.140 weigh much is

01:11:29.060 gas.

01:11:30.940 So it's

01:11:32.860 almost guaranteed

01:11:33.580 that somebody's

01:11:34.780 going to use

01:11:35.320 these for crop

01:11:37.120 dusting their

01:11:38.360 enemies.

01:11:43.220 So it's

01:11:44.020 coming.

01:11:45.040 Whether these

01:11:45.660 are real or

01:11:46.100 not, it's

01:11:46.560 definitely

01:11:46.800 coming.

01:11:49.780 And what

01:11:50.640 do you think

01:11:51.000 would be our

01:11:51.620 response if

01:11:52.580 our homeland

01:11:53.500 were attacked

01:11:54.240 by chemical

01:11:55.320 weapons and

01:11:56.020 drones?

01:11:57.020 Unless they

01:11:57.540 happened more

01:11:58.080 than once,

01:11:59.080 and it looked

01:11:59.440 like there was

01:11:59.980 nothing we

01:12:00.420 could do to

01:12:00.840 stop it.

01:12:01.440 What would

01:12:01.760 we do?

01:12:03.660 What would

01:12:04.260 the United

01:12:04.680 States do if

01:12:06.220 we knew the

01:12:06.860 drones were

01:12:07.420 coming from a

01:12:08.140 specific country

01:12:09.040 and they just

01:12:11.580 kept coming?

01:12:12.920 And imagine

01:12:13.420 what that would

01:12:13.900 do to our

01:12:14.320 cities.

01:12:16.000 Like people

01:12:16.680 wouldn't go

01:12:17.080 outdoors.

01:12:18.240 They'd stop

01:12:18.780 commuting.

01:12:19.920 I mean, it

01:12:20.180 would just

01:12:20.480 wreak havoc.

01:12:22.440 There's only one

01:12:23.200 thing we would

01:12:23.620 do.

01:12:23.800 We would pave

01:12:24.300 that country.

01:12:26.440 And that's

01:12:27.260 what my book

01:12:27.800 was about.

01:12:28.900 We will,

01:12:29.940 in all

01:12:30.380 likelihood,

01:12:31.840 there will

01:12:32.240 be drones

01:12:33.080 that terrorists

01:12:34.560 use with

01:12:35.240 chemical weapons.

01:12:36.220 In all

01:12:36.600 likelihood.

01:12:37.940 And if they

01:12:38.540 do it more

01:12:38.980 than once,

01:12:39.940 and it

01:12:40.280 becomes like

01:12:40.820 a pattern,

01:12:42.020 we won't

01:12:43.780 be able to

01:12:44.200 find the

01:12:44.820 specific

01:12:45.460 terrorists

01:12:45.940 probably.

01:12:48.080 We're going

01:12:48.640 to just

01:12:49.380 take out

01:12:49.740 the whole

01:12:49.980 country.

01:12:51.660 And we

01:12:52.960 just might

01:12:55.320 not have

01:12:55.660 any other

01:12:56.020 choice.

01:12:56.460 because we

01:12:57.220 wouldn't be

01:12:57.580 able to

01:12:57.820 live with

01:12:58.140 it.

01:12:59.080 And we

01:12:59.380 would do

01:12:59.660 whatever it

01:13:00.300 took.

01:13:00.920 And it

01:13:01.420 would be

01:13:01.680 genocide.

01:13:03.540 It would

01:13:04.080 be pure

01:13:04.640 genocide.

01:13:06.200 So that's

01:13:06.640 the setup

01:13:08.740 in the book.

01:13:09.800 The book

01:13:10.440 is what

01:13:10.900 happens when

01:13:11.580 genocide is

01:13:12.220 the only

01:13:12.680 solution.

01:13:16.160 What happens

01:13:16.880 when it's

01:13:17.220 the only

01:13:17.520 solution?

01:13:18.760 I hate to

01:13:19.380 use that

01:13:19.660 word solution

01:13:20.240 for obvious

01:13:21.880 reasons.

01:13:22.240 do you

01:13:25.600 think that

01:13:25.940 that's

01:13:26.180 likely?

01:13:27.660 Do you

01:13:27.920 think it's

01:13:28.240 likely that

01:13:28.940 that kind

01:13:30.080 of weapon

01:13:31.240 will come

01:13:31.720 to our

01:13:32.060 shores in

01:13:32.920 numbers?

01:13:34.060 And is it

01:13:34.640 likely that

01:13:35.200 we would

01:13:35.560 respond in

01:13:36.180 any other

01:13:36.700 way than

01:13:37.680 just eliminating

01:13:38.660 buildings in

01:13:39.880 the country?

01:13:40.780 We would

01:13:41.100 just make

01:13:41.400 sure everybody

01:13:41.880 had to live

01:13:42.300 outdoors.

01:13:44.820 I think

01:13:45.380 we just

01:13:45.640 eliminated it.

01:13:46.240 Yeah, we

01:13:49.580 get it.

01:13:51.780 Yeah, we

01:13:52.340 get it.

01:13:55.820 Is it

01:13:56.380 genocide if

01:13:56.960 it's self-defense?

01:13:57.860 Yeah, it

01:13:58.220 would be.

01:13:59.000 Because it

01:13:59.500 would be

01:13:59.740 genocide

01:14:00.200 against

01:14:00.720 99.9999%

01:14:03.360 innocent

01:14:03.840 people.

01:14:06.040 Depends on

01:14:06.600 the president?

01:14:07.600 I don't

01:14:08.180 think so.

01:14:09.440 See, that's

01:14:10.080 the hard

01:14:10.360 part.

01:14:10.800 I don't

01:14:11.160 think it

01:14:11.500 depends who's

01:14:12.060 in charge.

01:14:13.060 Because they'll

01:14:13.440 only have one

01:14:13.980 choice,

01:14:14.960 eventually.

01:14:16.240 that's not

01:14:19.560 woke.

01:14:20.940 Send in

01:14:21.400 those robot

01:14:21.940 soldiers.

01:14:25.640 All right.

01:14:26.520 That's

01:14:26.860 enough for

01:14:27.200 today.

01:14:28.360 I'm going

01:14:28.680 to go do

01:14:29.020 something else.

01:14:29.700 I think

01:14:30.060 you'd agree.

01:14:31.300 This is the

01:14:31.800 best live

01:14:32.240 stream you've

01:14:32.700 seen so

01:14:33.120 far today.

01:14:34.320 And it's

01:14:35.120 only going

01:14:35.420 to get

01:14:35.600 better.

01:14:36.760 And remember,

01:14:38.080 everything that

01:14:38.980 you've been

01:14:39.320 told is

01:14:40.020 backwards,

01:14:41.340 including

01:14:41.940 Friday the

01:14:43.140 13th.

01:14:44.180 It's a

01:14:44.540 good luck

01:14:44.880 day.

01:14:45.620 It's a

01:14:45.980 good luck

01:14:46.360 day.

01:14:47.560 Go out

01:14:47.880 and get

01:14:48.060 yourself

01:14:48.340 some good

01:14:48.700 luck.

01:14:50.060 And bye

01:14:50.560 for now,

01:14:50.980 YouTube.

01:14:51.380 I'm going

01:14:51.580 to talk to

01:14:51.940 the subscribers

01:14:52.720 for a little

01:14:53.260 bit on

01:14:53.680 locals,

01:14:54.300 because they're

01:14:55.200 special.

01:14:56.700 Bye for

01:14:57.280 now.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - January 13, 2023

Episode 1987 Scott Adams： Joe Biden's Garage, And The Government Lying To You About Everything

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript