Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1987 Scott Adams： Joe Biden's Garage, And The Government Lying To You About Everything

00:00:00.240 It's Friday the 13th, and YouTube, they tried to stop me, the gremlins of bad luck, but here I am.

00:00:12.120 Yeah, here I am. And you've managed to make it here for the highlight of civilization,

00:00:19.420 the best thing that's ever happened to you in your whole damn life. 0.63

00:00:22.860 And if you'd like to take it up a notch, and I think we all need that because it's Friday the 13th,

00:00:27.400 which I will reframe in a moment, all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a stein,

00:00:34.100 a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind, fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.

00:00:40.520 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine of the day.

00:00:44.040 The thing makes everything better, including Friday the 13th. It happens now. Go.

00:00:54.300 Yeah, that's some good stuff.

00:00:57.400 All right, watch me reframe Friday the 13th from what some of you think would be bad luck

00:01:03.320 into something better. Are you ready?

00:01:08.800 How many things happened this year that were just the way you expected them?

00:01:14.180 Not very many.

00:01:16.900 It's like opposite world.

00:01:18.340 We just spent years of investigating Trump for potential corruption with foreign countries.

00:01:26.720 What did we find?

00:01:28.820 We found that Joe Biden was corrupt with foreign countries.

00:01:33.560 How many times have we been told one thing is true, only to learn that the opposite is true?

00:01:41.780 How about those vaccinations that are totally stopping the spread of the virus?

00:01:48.700 Pretty much the opposite of a vaccination, isn't it?

00:01:51.960 As in, it doesn't stop it at all.

00:01:54.680 So why would Friday the 13th be the only thing this year that happened just the way it was presented?

00:02:03.980 No, it's probably opposite.

00:02:07.360 Probably the luckiest day of the year.

00:02:09.320 I have a prediction that some of you are going to have the best day you've ever had in your whole life.

00:02:14.240 Because nothing is what it seems.

00:02:16.980 Everything is maybe opposite.

00:02:20.440 Except for the good news.

00:02:22.000 Good news is always exactly what it seems.

00:02:25.200 Remember, reframes don't need to make sense.

00:02:27.860 If there's one thing I can teach you, a reframe doesn't have to make logical sense.

00:02:34.800 It just has to, the words just have to make sense in a sentence.

00:02:38.240 And that's good enough to reprogram your brain.

00:02:40.820 So that's the hypnotist in me teaching you that.

00:02:44.680 All right.

00:02:45.220 Lots of fun stories.

00:02:47.420 But I'd like to start with an inspirational quote from Kamala Harris.

00:02:54.100 And she did a little public speaking.

00:02:55.720 It's always a mistake.

00:02:57.860 But here's an exact quote from Kamala Harris.

00:03:01.800 I think of this moment as a moment that is about great moment, um.

00:03:09.740 Inspired by, yes, optimism.

00:03:13.460 But also inspired by, also, our collective effort to see what can be unburdened by what has been.

00:03:23.160 I didn't make that up.

00:03:29.040 That's a direct quote.

00:03:31.620 From your next president.

00:03:34.260 Maybe.

00:03:36.400 All right.

00:03:37.480 Here's some good news that I'd like to report.

00:03:39.800 How many of you have heard me bitching about how sports are all broken?

00:03:44.960 And they're broken because the sports were invented a hundred years ago.

00:03:49.500 And then we act like nothing changed.

00:03:52.320 So we don't have to change the rules.

00:03:54.820 Like tennis, for example, was completely destroyed by the quality of the equipment improving.

00:04:01.180 So you can hit a tennis ball so quickly that you can guarantee that the other person won't enjoy playing.

00:04:08.800 Guarantee.

00:04:10.160 I can make the other person totally not enjoy their day.

00:04:13.460 Oh, I can enjoy it.

00:04:14.920 Because it's fun to hit really hard.

00:04:17.560 So if it goes out, if it goes in, I feel good.

00:04:20.620 But I can make sure you don't enjoy it just by hitting the hell out of that ball.

00:04:25.160 So it turns out that somebody fixed sports.

00:04:30.300 At least once.

00:04:32.100 And here's how they did it.

00:04:33.100 They invented a new sport and they got rid of all the stupid stuff that ruined sports.

00:04:41.020 It's called pickleball.

00:04:44.200 And I was trying to understand why everybody was asking me, like everywhere,

00:04:49.980 have you played pickleball?

00:04:51.260 Have you played pickleball?

00:04:52.440 Have you played pickleball?

00:04:54.180 And I hadn't until yesterday.

00:04:57.480 So yesterday, you know, I have a tennis court.

00:05:00.340 So you can use, roughly you can use a tennis court.

00:05:02.800 Or you just mark out a smaller size.

00:05:06.020 And so I, you know, I just hit the ball around on a little bit of pickleball.

00:05:11.540 And here's what I discovered.

00:05:13.780 They fixed all the problems.

00:05:16.540 Here's one of the things they fixed.

00:05:18.580 A pickleball paddle is a hard paddle.

00:05:22.200 You never need to, you never need to tune up your paddle.

00:05:27.180 It's not like tennis where you need to fix your strings.

00:05:29.760 Let me, let me, let me tell you something that only, only tennis players know.

00:05:35.420 If you're like a serious weekend tennis player, watch the comments and the tennis players will confirm this.

00:05:41.980 Totally unexpected.

00:05:43.180 The number one correlation with whether I won my tennis matches against, you know, people I played with all the time or I lost was, what was the number one correlation?

00:05:56.280 How recently I had strung my racket and nothing else was even close.

00:06:00.840 There was no other factor that predicted who would win, right?

00:06:06.220 Now, just watch the other tennis players, they'll tell you.

00:06:09.420 You don't win, because usually you, you generally pick a player who is close to your ability.

00:06:15.620 And so the entire difference of who wins that day, you can play for two hours, and I can still tell you who's going to win.

00:06:24.320 It's the one who got their strings changed most recently, because it makes that much difference.

00:06:30.020 Now, paddle, pickleball, fix that. 1.00

00:06:31.940 You never have to get it re-strung.

00:06:33.380 The next thing is you always have, your tennis balls are always too new or too old.

00:06:39.900 That's something else you wouldn't know if you didn't play.

00:06:43.200 When you take a tennis ball out of the can, it's too new.

00:06:46.980 And even an experienced player has trouble handling it for several minutes.

00:06:52.040 And then you wear them out a little bit, and then they're good.

00:06:54.660 But by the end of the, toward the end, they're all worn out.

00:06:58.240 So they play completely different in the beginning than they do at the end.

00:07:02.140 It's supposed to be the same sport, but it doesn't even play the same by the end of the match.

00:07:06.100 So with pickleball, you're using this little hard plastic wiffle ball that's exactly the same from beginning to end.

00:07:14.860 And if you didn't want to, you would never have to buy another one.

00:07:19.200 You could have one ball that lasts you the rest of your life if you didn't lose it.

00:07:27.400 And then the other thing they did is that because it's a wiffle ball, when it bounces,

00:07:32.160 somebody can hit it at you pretty fast, but when it bounces, it slows down immediately

00:07:38.240 and just sets up nicely so you can hit it again, exactly where you expect it to be.

00:07:45.540 A regular tennis ball doesn't even bounce to the place you expect it.

00:07:50.340 That's the hardest thing about playing, right,

00:07:53.700 is the ball doesn't bounce the way you expect every time. It's different.

00:07:56.900 But the pickleball will bounce the same every time.

00:07:59.540 The other thing they did is that you don't have to run very much.

00:08:05.600 So if you were playing somebody competitively, you'd probably get a good workout

00:08:09.160 because, you know, you keep the ball in play for a long time.

00:08:12.280 That's the beauty of it.

00:08:13.600 And you would probably have plenty of running.

00:08:15.880 But you could also play doubles with your grandfather,

00:08:19.120 and your grandfather could play pickleball just fine

00:08:21.500 because there's not much moving in doubles.

00:08:23.440 So if somebody actually invented a game that's perfect for this part of society,

00:08:31.720 a 12-year-old could pick it up and play with a 70-year-old,

00:08:35.660 and they'd both be fine.

00:08:37.480 It's got a 15-minute learning curve.

00:08:41.020 Just think of that.

00:08:42.260 What sport has a 15-minute learning curve from never played to,

00:08:47.600 oh, I can do this pretty well.

00:08:49.180 I can do this as well as you can.

00:08:50.640 15 minutes, right?

00:08:54.540 Soccer.

00:08:55.720 Soccer would be great if they shortened the field,

00:08:59.380 got rid of out-of-bounds, which you do with indoor soccer,

00:09:02.960 shortened the field, fewer people, six-on-six, indoors.

00:09:07.740 Now that's a good game.

00:09:09.120 That is a great game.

00:09:10.760 Outdoors, some people can play.

00:09:13.860 All right.

00:09:14.240 You might be aware that I've been mocking fired Twitter employees

00:09:22.000 because I think it's funny.

00:09:27.320 Because the funny thing about it is that when Elon Musk was firing people at Twitter,

00:09:34.140 he was firing them in many cases.

00:09:37.560 They had too many people.

00:09:38.600 That was the big problem.

00:09:39.340 But in many cases, they were, let's say, famously not hard workers.

00:09:45.200 Now, I don't want to cast aspersions on every employee, obviously.

00:09:49.800 Clearly, some were hard workers, and maybe others were less serious.

00:09:53.640 But I've been running a series in Dilbert this week

00:09:57.340 where a number of the fired employees from Twitter have gotten jobs at Dilbert's company.

00:10:02.720 It's kind of perfect, isn't it?

00:10:06.160 Come on, admit it.

00:10:07.920 That is a perfect combination of headline with comic.

00:10:12.180 All right.

00:10:12.620 So here's one of them.

00:10:13.980 So this is the new Dilbert employee from Twitter.

00:10:20.420 And here's the joke.

00:10:21.920 The ex-Twitter employee now working for Dilbert's company says,

00:10:25.220 that's not how we did it when I worked at Twitter.

00:10:28.740 Then Dilbert says, maybe that's why Elon Musk fired you.

00:10:32.860 And then he says, how long are you going to use that on me?

00:10:36.600 And Dilbert says, I'm thinking three to five years.

00:10:40.220 Three to five years.

00:10:42.520 All right.

00:10:43.140 So that's all for that.

00:10:44.820 Have I ever told you that I planned 60 years in advance?

00:10:48.780 That's actually literally true.

00:10:51.380 I planned my whole life.

00:10:53.320 It worked out largely the way I planned it,

00:10:55.400 including being a famous cartoonist, which is weird.

00:10:58.380 It was that specific.

00:11:00.060 But there's one other long-range plan that I've had,

00:11:04.180 which I have talked about publicly, but not for a long time.

00:11:07.840 It goes like this.

00:11:09.880 I believed I was born at exactly the right time in history,

00:11:13.560 where if I could stay healthy into my senior years,

00:11:19.340 science would figure out how to stop aging.

00:11:21.960 I actually bet that if I really, really worked on keeping myself healthy

00:11:30.980 and kept my weight and stuff under control,

00:11:34.920 if I could reach approximately my current age and still be healthy,

00:11:39.740 that I could lock it in for the rest of my life.

00:11:42.940 Do you think that's possible?

00:11:47.760 Do you think anything like that's going to ever happen,

00:11:50.540 where you could just lock it in?

00:11:53.460 Well, it might be better than that.

00:11:57.360 So here's the story.

00:11:58.820 This is a real thing.

00:12:00.580 I'm not making this up.

00:12:01.700 So in a Boston lab, I guess there's some, let's see who's working on this,

00:12:07.100 reversing aging, but they got a big breakthrough.

00:12:10.140 We've heard this before, by the way.

00:12:12.420 You're all aware that there have been breakthroughs in aging before.

00:12:17.060 None of them really sounded real to me.

00:12:20.480 This is the first one that's ever sounded real.

00:12:22.900 And it's because of what they discovered more than how they're doing it, right?

00:12:29.760 Because I always thought to myself, can you really reverse aging?

00:12:33.500 Because the damage is already done, right?

00:12:36.580 But apparently, this is what some Boston researchers,

00:12:40.640 I think at least one person's associated with Harvard,

00:12:44.180 but they found out that it's an information problem, not a damage problem.

00:12:50.600 It's an information problem.

00:12:54.180 In other words, your body loses the information of what your DNA and your genetic makeup is.

00:13:02.680 And once it loses the information, it doesn't know how to make a new copy.

00:13:08.040 Here's what they discovered.

00:13:10.780 There's a backup copy.

00:13:14.720 No shit.

00:13:16.200 There's a backup copy.

00:13:18.600 They found the backup copy.

00:13:20.600 Let me just...

00:13:23.360 I'm going to say that three more times.

00:13:25.840 It's so mind-blowing.

00:13:27.780 It's so mind-blowing.

00:13:28.760 I just have to say it three times.

00:13:30.540 Just indulge me.

00:13:33.540 They found the backup copy.

00:13:37.440 They found the backup copy.

00:13:40.800 Did I mention they found the backup copy?

00:13:43.080 They figured out, yeah, I don't think it's in the stem cell necessarily.

00:13:50.100 I don't know the answer to where it was.

00:13:52.120 But they can actually, they can take a mouse that's old,

00:13:58.080 and they can restore its eyesight by making it younger.

00:14:02.360 They can restore its muscles.

00:14:05.380 They can restore its brain.

00:14:12.740 Its brain.

00:14:16.420 Not only can they restore it,

00:14:20.080 they've experimented going both directions.

00:14:22.380 They can make the mouse older, intentionally,

00:14:27.500 and they can make it younger, intentionally.

00:14:31.300 Now, what you're usually thinking in these cases, right,

00:14:35.580 is, okay, a lot of stuff works on mice,

00:14:39.000 and even though mice are 98% similar DNA to humans,

00:14:43.780 that 2% is a really big difference

00:14:46.240 when it comes to estimating what will happen.

00:14:49.920 There's a reason you go from mice to monkeys to humans.

00:14:53.060 You've got to test them all.

00:14:54.980 The mice aren't going to tell it.

00:14:56.740 But suppose it's true that in humans as well,

00:15:03.580 it's an information problem,

00:15:06.080 and there's a backup copy.

00:15:07.960 Because that appears to be the case with the mice.

00:15:11.320 It's just an information problem,

00:15:13.420 and they found the backup copy.

00:15:15.720 If they do that with humans,

00:15:19.420 there's, I hate to say it's common sense,

00:15:22.500 because common sense is totally magical thinking

00:15:24.520 and confirmation bias,

00:15:26.340 but it seems to me

00:15:27.720 that if it's an information problem,

00:15:31.940 and this is a big leap, I know,

00:15:34.060 there's a greater likelihood

00:15:35.580 it would work in humans without bad effect.

00:15:38.520 Does that make sense?

00:15:40.480 It's not like they're introducing a chemical

00:15:43.100 necessarily that's changing the nature

00:15:46.900 of your DNA or something.

00:15:48.460 If the only thing they do is find the backup copy

00:15:51.240 and restore it,

00:15:53.840 I wonder who we might actually be able to change aging.

00:16:01.300 Do you know that big problem of the demographic bubble?

00:16:06.280 It's going to get worse,

00:16:07.560 but maybe better.

00:16:09.440 Because maybe you take a bunch of 70-year-olds

00:16:12.600 and you say,

00:16:13.060 oh, no,

00:16:13.720 if we make you all live to 100,

00:16:16.340 we're not going to have enough money to survive.

00:16:19.560 But instead you say,

00:16:20.860 hey,

00:16:21.860 you're 75 years old,

00:16:23.260 you used to be retired,

00:16:24.560 but now we're going to make you feel like you're 25 years old.

00:16:27.140 If you want,

00:16:27.640 go back to work.

00:16:28.740 And people say,

00:16:29.660 oh, okay,

00:16:30.580 I feel good,

00:16:31.220 I'll go back to work.

00:16:31.900 But the way that things could play out

00:16:34.880 in the next 50 years

00:16:36.120 are so unpredictable.

00:16:38.820 If you add AI

00:16:40.240 and immortality

00:16:42.400 and robots

00:16:44.200 and space travel,

00:16:47.000 how do you predict anything?

00:16:49.760 There's literally nothing you can predict anymore.

00:16:54.360 All right,

00:16:55.280 there's a company called,

00:16:56.560 I wrote about this in my book,

00:16:58.320 Loser Think.

00:16:58.860 It was a company called ClimeWorks,

00:17:01.340 C-L-I-M-E, 1.00

00:17:03.280 ClimeWorks,

00:17:04.080 all one word.

00:17:05.520 And they're in production now

00:17:07.620 with a carbon sucking machine.

00:17:13.060 So it sucks carbon out of the air

00:17:14.940 and they store it underground.

00:17:18.000 Now,

00:17:18.660 what is the first thing you'd say

00:17:20.260 about a thing like that

00:17:21.480 that couldn't possibly be cost effective, right?

00:17:25.820 Takes a whole bunch of energy.

00:17:27.360 You know,

00:17:28.100 that's a bad thing to need.

00:17:29.780 So you got to use a lot of energy

00:17:31.340 to suck it out of the sky, 0.99

00:17:32.920 but there's no way

00:17:33.620 it can be economical.

00:17:35.640 They found a way

00:17:36.560 to make it economical.

00:17:39.700 That's a big deal.

00:17:41.460 And the way they did it is

00:17:42.760 they,

00:17:44.360 there are such things

00:17:46.320 as carbon credits

00:17:47.420 and they're big companies

00:17:49.060 that can't reach their carbon,

00:17:51.460 let's say, goals.

00:17:53.340 So a company like Microsoft

00:17:54.780 will say,

00:17:55.680 oh damn,

00:17:57.160 you know,

00:17:57.400 we can't really beat Microsoft

00:17:58.780 and not meet our

00:17:59.900 climate change goals, right?

00:18:02.640 That's just too politically

00:18:03.940 employee-wise.

00:18:06.640 It just is a bad look.

00:18:08.140 So Microsoft

00:18:08.860 will go to a company like this

00:18:10.380 and say,

00:18:11.340 what's it going to cost me

00:18:12.600 to pay you some money

00:18:14.860 to remove some carbon

00:18:17.420 that I can claim

00:18:19.020 because I paid the money?

00:18:20.100 So you don't have to

00:18:21.320 do it yourself.

00:18:22.700 You can just be the one

00:18:23.520 that causes it to happen

00:18:24.540 and get some kind

00:18:25.460 of carbon credit.

00:18:27.280 So Microsoft goes to them

00:18:28.540 and says,

00:18:28.940 what's it cost to remove

00:18:30.620 a bunch of carbon

00:18:31.360 so I can meet my goals?

00:18:32.880 And they give them a price

00:18:34.340 and then what does Microsoft say?

00:18:36.720 Holy what?

00:18:38.840 You're going to charge that much?

00:18:41.440 That's insane.

00:18:42.380 That's like,

00:18:42.780 that's like a hundred times

00:18:44.140 more than I think it's worth.

00:18:46.080 And then what do they do?

00:18:47.640 Then they pay it.

00:18:49.420 Then they pay it

00:18:50.460 because they don't have

00:18:51.300 another choice.

00:18:52.800 Because not meeting

00:18:53.960 their climate goals

00:18:55.060 would just be so terrible.

00:18:57.100 And Microsoft is so big

00:18:58.560 that they can overpay

00:19:00.560 by a hundred times

00:19:01.720 on some, you know,

00:19:02.940 smaller part of their

00:19:04.820 financial statement.

00:19:07.040 And it still makes sense

00:19:08.460 because they're not really

00:19:10.060 buying a better climate.

00:19:12.360 They're buying reputation.

00:19:16.100 And so this company

00:19:17.380 allows you to buy reputation.

00:19:19.900 At the same time,

00:19:21.440 you might be doing

00:19:22.160 something good

00:19:22.760 for the climate.

00:19:24.180 They actually solve

00:19:25.440 the economics.

00:19:27.320 Do you know

00:19:27.800 what a big deal that is?

00:19:30.020 It's almost incalculable

00:19:32.660 in terms of what a big deal

00:19:35.120 that could be.

00:19:36.900 It could make,

00:19:37.980 you know,

00:19:38.480 it could make it

00:19:40.580 completely practical

00:19:41.640 to do this technology.

00:19:44.660 Now, you remember,

00:19:45.800 I think this is still in place,

00:19:48.020 but didn't Elon Musk

00:19:49.260 offer some kind of

00:19:50.700 X-prize

00:19:51.620 for whoever comes up

00:19:53.360 with the best

00:19:53.800 carbon capture

00:19:54.680 technology?

00:19:57.300 So this company

00:19:58.920 is using the technology

00:20:00.420 probably at least part

00:20:02.380 since 2009.

00:20:05.340 That's when they started,

00:20:06.520 around then.

00:20:07.700 So they've been in business

00:20:08.800 for a long time

00:20:09.560 and it takes a long time

00:20:10.360 to build the assets.

00:20:11.180 So they're probably

00:20:12.540 just guessing

00:20:14.000 five to ten years

00:20:16.260 behind the technology curve

00:20:17.760 because at some point

00:20:19.380 you just have to

00:20:20.040 build what is available.

00:20:21.580 You can't wait forever.

00:20:23.040 It takes a few years

00:20:23.900 to build it.

00:20:24.940 So you're always

00:20:25.440 behind technology

00:20:26.760 by the time you're done.

00:20:30.120 Yeah.

00:20:30.640 No, I see the comments.

00:20:32.480 I understand that it's ESG,

00:20:33.940 but the carbon credit part,

00:20:41.160 if that's the only part

00:20:43.180 and big companies

00:20:44.400 just buy their way out of it,

00:20:47.300 it might turn into

00:20:48.120 something good.

00:20:49.540 Good.

00:20:50.640 Now, you could argue

00:20:51.680 that there's no reason

00:20:52.640 to do it

00:20:53.440 and they'll suck 0.99

00:20:54.600 all the carbon

00:20:55.440 out of the air

00:20:56.020 and all your plants

00:20:57.340 will die. 0.61

00:20:57.760 But I feel like

00:20:59.580 the Adam's Law

00:21:01.600 of slow-moving disasters

00:21:02.900 is working perfectly

00:21:04.980 for climate change

00:21:06.220 because one of two things

00:21:08.240 is going to happen.

00:21:08.920 We're either going to find out

00:21:09.900 it was never real

00:21:11.240 and totally possible.

00:21:14.960 I'm still going to call it

00:21:16.260 I still want to kill ESG,

00:21:18.740 but I don't think

00:21:19.640 you need ESG

00:21:20.440 to have a climate objective.

00:21:24.060 I think the companies

00:21:24.860 just do that on their own

00:21:25.980 at this point

00:21:26.520 because it looks good.

00:21:27.760 I don't think

00:21:28.320 they need ESG

00:21:29.320 to be driving it.

00:21:30.380 So I think you can

00:21:31.060 separate those two things.

00:21:33.600 All right.

00:21:35.280 Here is the least surprising

00:21:37.200 news item

00:21:38.980 you'll ever hear.

00:21:41.120 ABC is reporting

00:21:42.240 that climate change

00:21:43.220 is causing heart attacks.

00:21:51.400 Can you all join me

00:21:53.260 in a long, sarcastic sigh?

00:21:57.760 Because sometimes words

00:21:59.140 words don't really capture

00:22:01.520 what you're thinking, right?

00:22:03.600 I'd like to lead you all

00:22:05.120 in a long sigh

00:22:06.300 about ABC reporting

00:22:08.600 that climate change

00:22:09.460 is causing heart attacks.

00:22:10.740 At this time,

00:22:12.760 at this very interesting time,

00:22:14.740 of course they are.

00:22:23.300 Of course they are.

00:22:26.120 But here's the interesting thing.

00:22:28.700 They might have data

00:22:29.680 to back it.

00:22:32.560 Apparently it's a thing.

00:22:34.660 Apparently it's a thing.

00:22:35.600 So they believe

00:22:37.360 they found correlation

00:22:38.480 between excess heat

00:22:41.620 and athletes dying

00:22:44.600 suddenly from heart attacks.

00:22:48.160 Turns out,

00:22:49.660 they claim

00:22:50.480 that the athletes

00:22:52.260 keeling over

00:22:52.920 with heart attacks

00:22:53.680 are far more likely

00:22:54.700 to happen

00:22:55.180 in these unusually hot

00:22:57.560 places.

00:22:59.040 Do you believe that?

00:23:03.700 That's a little hard

00:23:04.640 to believe.

00:23:05.940 But,

00:23:07.160 I would like to

00:23:08.500 refer to you

00:23:09.440 to the

00:23:11.000 Sherrill Law

00:23:12.700 of Restaurants.

00:23:14.600 The Sherrill Law

00:23:16.060 of Restaurants

00:23:16.800 is that

00:23:18.240 as soon as anything

00:23:19.460 changes in the environment,

00:23:21.100 people stop going

00:23:21.860 to the restaurant

00:23:22.400 for a while.

00:23:24.200 So if it gets

00:23:25.180 really warm outside,

00:23:26.240 like the weather

00:23:26.680 is really nice,

00:23:27.380 for a few weeks

00:23:29.040 people stop going

00:23:29.780 to restaurants.

00:23:31.100 If it rains,

00:23:33.380 people stop going

00:23:34.120 to restaurants

00:23:34.700 until it stops.

00:23:36.580 If it's tax day,

00:23:39.140 people stop going

00:23:39.840 to restaurants.

00:23:40.900 Basically,

00:23:41.840 anything that changes

00:23:42.880 makes people

00:23:43.980 stop their behavior.

00:23:45.660 And what happens

00:23:46.280 when people change

00:23:47.060 their behavior?

00:23:48.780 Stress.

00:23:50.860 So it's also a thing

00:23:52.760 that whenever

00:23:54.740 there's any big change

00:23:55.960 in society,

00:23:56.700 that's disruptive

00:23:58.540 to us mentally

00:23:59.500 as well as physically,

00:24:00.720 people have more

00:24:01.500 heart attacks.

00:24:02.920 Basically,

00:24:03.560 everything that's

00:24:04.240 a big change

00:24:05.000 causes heart attacks.

00:24:07.580 And so,

00:24:08.180 one expert

00:24:09.200 I told you about

00:24:10.040 already,

00:24:10.780 said that the pandemic

00:24:11.880 itself

00:24:12.500 and the lockdowns

00:24:13.820 should create

00:24:15.240 a lot of heart attacks.

00:24:16.780 It's exactly

00:24:17.400 what you should say.

00:24:18.440 A lot of

00:24:18.860 unexplained heart attacks.

00:24:20.700 So,

00:24:21.000 I'm not going

00:24:23.480 to be the one

00:24:23.960 that tells you

00:24:24.540 that the vaccinations

00:24:26.520 are completely safe

00:24:28.120 because nobody

00:24:29.320 ever thought that.

00:24:30.680 Even people in favor

00:24:31.900 of that knew

00:24:32.340 that there was

00:24:32.780 risk involved.

00:24:33.960 For some people,

00:24:34.740 for sure.

00:24:35.960 So,

00:24:36.840 it does,

00:24:39.000 even to me,

00:24:40.380 and I'm trying

00:24:41.160 to remain skeptical

00:24:41.980 as long as possible,

00:24:43.140 it does look to me

00:24:44.100 like the myocarditis

00:24:45.320 is not entirely

00:24:46.940 environmentally caused.

00:24:48.940 Can we agree?

00:24:50.820 It sure doesn't

00:24:51.580 look like it.

00:24:53.220 Does everybody

00:24:53.840 agree with that statement?

00:24:55.600 You know,

00:24:55.840 we could all be surprised

00:24:56.940 by data being

00:24:58.100 misleading,

00:24:59.960 but it sure looks

00:25:01.760 like something's

00:25:02.420 going on.

00:25:03.380 So,

00:25:03.680 I agree with you

00:25:04.460 on how it feels,

00:25:06.460 and I agree

00:25:07.040 with how it looks.

00:25:08.460 Now,

00:25:08.980 what happens

00:25:09.440 when somebody

00:25:09.960 like Lisa Marie Presley

00:25:11.500 dies,

00:25:12.140 unfortunately,

00:25:12.920 at 51?

00:25:15.320 What was she,

00:25:16.420 54?

00:25:17.240 She was early 50s,

00:25:18.200 right?

00:25:18.920 And she died

00:25:19.680 of a heart attack.

00:25:22.540 Now,

00:25:23.820 she also had 0.60

00:25:24.660 a history,

00:25:25.480 54 years old,

00:25:26.380 okay.

00:25:26.940 She also had 0.60

00:25:27.520 a history of drugs,

00:25:29.420 and if you see

00:25:30.440 any picture of her,

00:25:31.420 she does not look

00:25:32.100 like, you know,

00:25:33.120 a healthy person.

00:25:35.380 So,

00:25:35.980 if you're going

00:25:36.480 to pick somebody

00:25:37.100 to have a heart attack,

00:25:39.200 you know,

00:25:39.460 she'd be on your 0.99

00:25:40.140 short list,

00:25:40.740 I think,

00:25:41.040 even at her age.

00:25:45.320 So,

00:25:45.840 of course,

00:25:46.260 we all will

00:25:46.900 jump to conclusions

00:25:48.160 about what killed her.

00:25:50.320 I'm sure it was

00:25:51.220 climate change.

00:25:53.160 Just kidding.

00:25:54.840 All right.

00:25:57.900 Oh,

00:25:58.160 believe it or not,

00:25:59.700 it's also true

00:26:00.420 that pharmaceutical

00:26:01.740 medicines can work

00:26:03.940 differently in high heat.

00:26:06.780 I think it's true,

00:26:08.280 or at least

00:26:08.740 it's reported.

00:26:09.340 Let's assume

00:26:10.600 that everything

00:26:11.020 could be sketchy,

00:26:12.260 so we won't assume

00:26:13.120 it's true.

00:26:13.440 But they actually

00:26:14.520 have some indication,

00:26:16.560 maybe short of proof,

00:26:18.080 but they have

00:26:18.520 some indication

00:26:19.180 that a medication

00:26:21.840 that was really

00:26:22.600 good for you

00:26:23.340 will kill you

00:26:25.060 above a certain

00:26:26.160 temperature outdoors.

00:26:29.120 If you're active,

00:26:30.220 I guess.

00:26:30.680 Not if you just

00:26:31.560 walk outdoors.

00:26:33.020 But,

00:26:34.260 I don't know,

00:26:35.780 does that sound true?

00:26:37.780 I don't know,

00:26:38.860 maybe.

00:26:39.300 I saw a tweet

00:26:41.540 by Antonio Guterres

00:26:43.940 who claims

00:26:45.420 that the past

00:26:46.060 eight years

00:26:46.660 were the warmest

00:26:47.540 on record globally.

00:26:51.620 And,

00:26:52.200 you know,

00:26:52.380 therefore,

00:26:53.260 blah, blah, blah.

00:26:54.400 Now,

00:26:54.920 what is left

00:26:55.680 out of that?

00:26:57.180 Well,

00:26:57.620 I'm not sure

00:26:58.400 because I don't

00:26:59.320 believe anything

00:26:59.880 about data

00:27:00.940 and temperature.

00:27:02.220 But,

00:27:02.800 I just saw a claim

00:27:04.320 the other day

00:27:04.940 that 2022

00:27:05.800 set no records.

00:27:07.160 Could they both

00:27:09.900 be true?

00:27:11.760 Could it be true

00:27:12.640 that 2022

00:27:13.320 set no weather

00:27:14.620 records

00:27:15.180 while at the

00:27:16.700 same time

00:27:17.340 the past

00:27:18.120 eight years

00:27:18.700 were the warmest

00:27:19.440 on record globally?

00:27:21.060 Because that

00:27:21.720 is a record.

00:27:23.620 So,

00:27:24.180 we've got one person

00:27:24.960 saying no records

00:27:25.820 were set

00:27:26.480 and another one

00:27:28.020 saying,

00:27:28.420 yep,

00:27:28.700 we just set a record

00:27:29.640 for the

00:27:31.020 eight hottest years.

00:27:34.420 Yeah.

00:27:34.540 both could

00:27:36.720 be true-ish.

00:27:39.280 Could be true-ish.

00:27:40.700 But you see

00:27:41.240 the problem,

00:27:41.800 right?

00:27:42.480 Now,

00:27:43.920 there's a class

00:27:45.780 of people

00:27:46.340 on Twitter

00:27:47.540 who really,

00:27:49.040 really like to

00:27:49.700 argue the

00:27:50.320 technical,

00:27:51.500 factual accuracy

00:27:52.580 of statements

00:27:53.900 that really

00:27:54.520 should not be

00:27:55.400 analyzed for

00:27:56.580 exact technical

00:27:58.260 accuracy.

00:27:59.360 This is one

00:28:00.220 of them.

00:28:01.140 All right?

00:28:01.300 If you're

00:28:02.660 nickel-and-diming

00:28:03.420 me about

00:28:03.920 the words

00:28:04.720 or really

00:28:05.420 talking about

00:28:05.940 two different

00:28:06.420 things,

00:28:06.860 I get it.

00:28:08.080 I get it.

00:28:08.880 They were

00:28:09.180 talking about

00:28:09.800 two slightly

00:28:11.020 different things,

00:28:12.100 but it is

00:28:13.080 nonetheless true

00:28:13.980 that you either

00:28:16.560 set a record

00:28:17.120 or you didn't.

00:28:17.900 You know,

00:28:18.080 that's kind of

00:28:18.560 binary.

00:28:19.760 But,

00:28:20.180 here's my

00:28:20.580 larger point.

00:28:22.560 Can you

00:28:23.240 trust anything

00:28:24.000 on records

00:28:26.480 and weather?

00:28:27.820 I don't think

00:28:28.580 so.

00:28:28.820 let me do

00:28:31.900 something that

00:28:32.620 confuses the

00:28:33.980 Klopp-Bertz.

00:28:35.720 I'm going to

00:28:36.420 say something

00:28:37.060 that sounds

00:28:37.740 like I'm

00:28:39.140 disagreeing

00:28:39.880 with my

00:28:40.360 own,

00:28:41.160 let's say,

00:28:42.460 team.

00:28:43.500 Because I

00:28:44.460 roughly identify

00:28:46.640 with a group

00:28:48.140 of people

00:28:48.520 who have

00:28:48.740 similar opinions.

00:28:50.920 So now I'm

00:28:51.580 going to

00:28:52.960 criticize

00:28:53.400 an argument

00:28:54.360 by my own

00:28:55.220 team.

00:28:56.200 Here's the

00:28:56.780 worst

00:28:57.420 skeptical

00:28:58.640 argument

00:28:59.180 about

00:28:59.760 climate.

00:29:01.660 This is

00:29:02.060 the worst

00:29:02.580 one.

00:29:03.860 It used

00:29:04.360 to be

00:29:04.700 warmer

00:29:05.080 and there

00:29:07.160 used to

00:29:07.580 be more

00:29:08.080 CO2,

00:29:09.600 which are

00:29:10.720 different

00:29:11.000 points.

00:29:12.060 Because the

00:29:13.620 points are

00:29:14.120 that it

00:29:15.080 used to

00:29:15.340 be warmer

00:29:15.860 at lower

00:29:16.460 CO2 and

00:29:17.560 there used

00:29:17.880 to be

00:29:18.100 more CO2

00:29:18.900 at lower

00:29:19.420 temperatures.

00:29:20.560 So if you

00:29:21.020 look back

00:29:21.400 in history,

00:29:23.900 you know,

00:29:24.480 you can see

00:29:25.020 that what

00:29:25.700 we're claiming

00:29:26.200 today doesn't

00:29:26.840 make sense.

00:29:28.640 the

00:29:34.220 Nickelback

00:29:34.720 theory of

00:29:35.400 deaths.

00:29:36.500 All right.

00:29:39.780 So here's

00:29:40.860 why those

00:29:41.280 arguments are

00:29:41.820 the worst.

00:29:43.020 I'm not

00:29:43.720 talking about

00:29:44.300 the last

00:29:44.840 20 years.

00:29:46.580 If you're

00:29:46.980 debating

00:29:47.280 the last

00:29:48.720 20 years,

00:29:49.840 that's

00:29:50.580 probably fair.

00:29:51.660 But if you

00:29:52.180 go back to

00:29:52.780 the early

00:29:53.960 days of the

00:29:54.700 planet,

00:29:55.020 and you

00:29:56.580 say,

00:29:57.060 well,

00:29:57.320 in the

00:29:57.560 early days

00:29:58.080 of the

00:29:58.320 planet,

00:29:59.060 we had

00:30:00.160 way more

00:30:00.860 CO2,

00:30:02.160 does everybody

00:30:02.900 know why

00:30:03.360 that argument

00:30:03.820 doesn't make

00:30:04.300 sense?

00:30:06.280 Are you all

00:30:07.080 aware of why

00:30:07.680 that's a

00:30:08.180 debunked

00:30:08.660 argument?

00:30:10.340 Because if

00:30:11.060 you go back

00:30:11.520 far enough,

00:30:12.940 there were

00:30:13.640 other things

00:30:14.320 that were

00:30:14.560 different.

00:30:15.600 For example,

00:30:16.600 the intensity

00:30:17.320 of the sun

00:30:17.860 was different.

00:30:18.960 The composition

00:30:19.600 of the atmosphere

00:30:20.360 was different.

00:30:20.820 So if you

00:30:21.720 go back

00:30:22.220 far enough,

00:30:25.700 it doesn't

00:30:26.460 matter what

00:30:26.860 the CO2

00:30:27.440 was,

00:30:28.080 that doesn't

00:30:28.560 tell you

00:30:28.900 anything.

00:30:29.620 Because

00:30:29.920 everything else

00:30:30.580 was different.

00:30:31.760 Does that

00:30:32.100 make sense?

00:30:33.080 If everything

00:30:33.840 was the same,

00:30:35.480 except for

00:30:36.020 the CO2,

00:30:37.100 then that

00:30:37.620 might tell

00:30:38.060 you something.

00:30:39.460 But if

00:30:39.980 everything was

00:30:40.740 different in

00:30:41.160 the past,

00:30:41.880 including CO2,

00:30:43.540 then there's

00:30:44.140 nothing about

00:30:44.640 the CO2

00:30:45.240 that tells

00:30:45.640 you anything.

00:30:46.520 Too many

00:30:46.940 variables.

00:30:48.280 And that's

00:30:48.680 the case.

00:30:50.020 Yeah,

00:30:50.120 the sun

00:30:50.620 was different,

00:30:52.260 different intensity,

00:30:53.340 just everything

00:30:53.760 was different.

00:30:57.260 However,

00:30:58.140 if you want

00:30:58.800 to make

00:30:59.000 the argument

00:30:59.500 that the

00:31:01.080 alarmists

00:31:02.560 have been

00:31:03.020 wrong for

00:31:03.780 50 years,

00:31:06.680 Daniel says

00:31:07.440 incorrect.

00:31:08.260 No,

00:31:08.580 Daniel,

00:31:09.560 the word

00:31:09.940 incorrect

00:31:10.400 means that

00:31:11.040 you're

00:31:11.240 incorrect.

00:31:12.680 And the

00:31:13.240 word wrong

00:31:13.800 means that

00:31:14.180 you're wrong. 0.83

00:31:15.440 Because if

00:31:16.240 I were wrong,

00:31:17.340 you'd give me

00:31:17.720 a reason.

00:31:19.340 Wouldn't

00:31:19.620 you?

00:31:20.120 I think

00:31:20.760 you would.

00:31:21.740 Yeah.

00:31:22.260 Yeah,

00:31:22.700 there were

00:31:22.960 a difference

00:31:23.420 in how many

00:31:23.880 plants there

00:31:24.480 were,

00:31:25.020 all kinds

00:31:25.500 of differences.

00:31:26.480 So if

00:31:27.240 you're going

00:31:27.480 to use

00:31:27.780 the past

00:31:28.440 to make

00:31:29.020 your argument,

00:31:30.360 I'd use

00:31:30.860 the last

00:31:31.280 50 years,

00:31:32.720 but I

00:31:33.060 wouldn't

00:31:33.300 use

00:31:33.820 thousands

00:31:34.480 of years

00:31:34.980 ago.

00:31:35.680 That's a

00:31:36.080 bad

00:31:36.340 argument.

00:31:38.560 Does

00:31:38.960 anybody

00:31:39.340 agree?

00:31:41.680 Because you

00:31:42.340 can still

00:31:42.740 be super

00:31:43.360 skeptical

00:31:43.860 on climate

00:31:45.080 change,

00:31:45.400 but don't

00:31:45.820 use the

00:31:46.460 historical

00:31:47.180 middle,

00:31:49.600 what do

00:31:50.740 we use,

00:31:51.140 the dark

00:31:51.680 ages and

00:31:52.280 shit?

00:31:53.320 Just ignore

00:31:53.980 all that.

00:31:54.860 And I don't

00:31:55.400 really believe

00:31:56.140 we can tell

00:31:56.600 the temperature

00:31:57.180 even 50

00:31:58.840 years ago,

00:31:59.360 frankly.

00:32:00.400 You know,

00:32:00.620 Tony Heller

00:32:01.160 is back

00:32:01.660 on Twitter.

00:32:04.320 Does everybody

00:32:04.920 remember Tony

00:32:05.620 Heller?

00:32:06.540 He's the

00:32:07.100 most prolific

00:32:08.200 data skeptic

00:32:10.460 about climate

00:32:11.040 change.

00:32:11.820 Now,

00:32:12.020 he goes

00:32:12.340 after the

00:32:12.780 data.

00:32:13.540 He says,

00:32:14.060 this data

00:32:14.520 is incorrect

00:32:15.140 and he gives

00:32:15.780 his reasons.

00:32:16.980 Now,

00:32:18.020 I spent a

00:32:18.720 lot of time

00:32:19.240 interacting with

00:32:20.080 his material

00:32:20.760 and I came

00:32:22.080 to the

00:32:22.400 following

00:32:22.680 conclusion.

00:32:24.480 I don't

00:32:25.000 know if,

00:32:27.400 you know,

00:32:27.660 I can't

00:32:28.060 judge all

00:32:28.720 of it,

00:32:30.140 but there

00:32:30.780 were enough

00:32:31.280 things there

00:32:31.780 that were

00:32:32.140 clearly wrong

00:32:33.260 in my

00:32:34.560 subjective

00:32:35.040 opinion

00:32:35.520 that I

00:32:36.660 discounted

00:32:37.280 everything else

00:32:37.940 he said.

00:32:39.080 Because

00:32:39.320 unfortunately,

00:32:40.580 even if you

00:32:41.120 write about

00:32:41.660 a bunch

00:32:41.940 of stuff,

00:32:43.060 if you

00:32:43.500 also say

00:32:44.240 a bunch

00:32:44.520 of stuff

00:32:44.840 that is

00:32:45.160 clearly

00:32:45.580 not true,

00:32:47.240 then I

00:32:47.980 discount all

00:32:48.560 the rest.

00:32:49.460 But it

00:32:49.760 doesn't mean

00:32:50.140 it's not

00:32:50.460 true.

00:32:51.960 I mean,

00:32:52.580 I have a

00:32:53.520 feeling he's

00:32:54.180 got some

00:32:54.580 good points

00:32:55.180 in there.

00:32:55.880 It's just

00:32:56.140 you can't

00:32:56.520 tell which

00:32:56.860 ones.

00:32:57.800 Because some

00:32:58.240 of them

00:32:58.460 clearly don't

00:32:59.240 look true

00:32:59.620 to me.

00:33:00.500 Just,

00:33:00.860 you know,

00:33:01.800 you can

00:33:02.720 just almost

00:33:03.460 tell what's

00:33:04.080 wrong with

00:33:04.440 them by

00:33:04.660 looking at

00:33:05.040 them.

00:33:05.900 Now,

00:33:06.860 he does

00:33:07.460 a lot of

00:33:08.200 analysis on

00:33:09.000 a lot of

00:33:09.340 different things.

00:33:10.000 Is there

00:33:10.300 any chance

00:33:11.200 he could be

00:33:11.660 right about

00:33:12.140 any of it?

00:33:12.780 Or,

00:33:13.000 I'm sorry,

00:33:13.780 is there any

00:33:14.300 chance he

00:33:15.220 could be

00:33:15.800 right about

00:33:17.220 all of it?

00:33:17.900 Because he

00:33:18.200 makes a lot

00:33:18.820 of claims.

00:33:20.100 Not really.

00:33:21.260 There's nobody

00:33:21.980 who could be

00:33:22.460 right about a

00:33:23.240 lot of claims

00:33:23.940 on sketchy

00:33:25.460 data.

00:33:26.180 Nobody could

00:33:26.700 do that.

00:33:27.560 Is he right

00:33:28.180 about some

00:33:29.060 of it being

00:33:30.220 a lie or

00:33:31.280 misleading?

00:33:32.620 Almost

00:33:33.160 certainly true.

00:33:34.620 Some of it.

00:33:35.840 I just don't

00:33:36.380 know if it's

00:33:36.800 important.

00:33:37.180 But what's

00:33:39.660 interesting is

00:33:40.420 that he was

00:33:41.140 completely

00:33:41.540 suppressed by

00:33:42.560 the platforms.

00:33:44.940 When he's

00:33:45.760 not suppressed,

00:33:47.220 he's back on

00:33:47.940 Twitter quite

00:33:48.440 active,

00:33:49.380 he does

00:33:49.940 move the

00:33:50.520 ball.

00:33:52.300 He actually

00:33:53.080 changes the

00:33:53.800 whole argument,

00:33:54.500 in my opinion,

00:33:55.480 because he

00:33:56.440 always presents

00:33:57.100 graphics and

00:33:58.200 data.

00:33:59.540 He always

00:33:59.980 shows his

00:34:00.440 work.

00:34:01.600 And what

00:34:02.560 have I told

00:34:03.000 you about a

00:34:03.440 documentary?

00:34:03.940 All documentaries

00:34:06.180 are persuasive,

00:34:07.380 even if they're

00:34:08.000 lies.

00:34:08.780 They're really

00:34:09.540 persuasive,

00:34:10.300 because you

00:34:10.620 don't see the

00:34:11.080 other side.

00:34:12.120 When Tony

00:34:12.800 Heller does

00:34:13.340 his presentations,

00:34:14.680 they are super

00:34:15.780 persuasive.

00:34:17.900 Persuasion-wise,

00:34:19.720 he's a

00:34:20.700 champion.

00:34:21.480 He's really

00:34:21.920 persuasive.

00:34:23.140 But what he

00:34:24.040 isn't,

00:34:24.620 necessarily,

00:34:26.040 is credible

00:34:27.060 enough that I

00:34:29.420 could accept

00:34:30.040 his more

00:34:30.780 extreme claims.

00:34:32.620 But he's

00:34:33.900 really interesting.

00:34:34.700 I'm kind of

00:34:35.060 glad he's

00:34:35.440 back,

00:34:35.820 frankly.

00:34:36.500 I like the

00:34:37.300 fact that he

00:34:37.680 makes everybody

00:34:38.300 answer to his

00:34:40.220 claims.

00:34:41.120 And you should

00:34:42.100 also know that

00:34:42.660 there are people

00:34:43.080 who make a

00:34:44.080 job of

00:34:44.580 debunking him,

00:34:45.820 and do a

00:34:46.360 good job.

00:34:47.900 So if you

00:34:48.480 were to look,

00:34:49.060 just Google

00:34:50.580 his name,

00:34:51.340 and Google

00:34:52.180 the word

00:34:52.600 debunk,

00:34:53.220 which is a

00:34:53.680 good thing

00:34:54.000 to do,

00:34:54.320 by the way,

00:34:55.240 you're going

00:34:55.700 to see a

00:34:56.320 lot of his

00:34:57.020 claims allegedly

00:34:58.700 debunked.

00:35:00.080 But can you

00:35:00.700 believe the

00:35:01.140 debunker?

00:35:02.620 What do you

00:35:03.020 think?

00:35:03.800 Can you

00:35:04.200 believe the

00:35:04.700 debunker,

00:35:05.260 no matter who

00:35:05.760 it is?

00:35:06.200 Doesn't matter

00:35:06.640 who it is.

00:35:06.980 Can you

00:35:07.200 believe him?

00:35:08.640 No.

00:35:09.600 No.

00:35:10.600 Because they

00:35:11.140 only show

00:35:11.480 one side.

00:35:13.080 Everybody who

00:35:13.740 is just

00:35:13.960 saying one

00:35:14.440 side,

00:35:15.460 you don't

00:35:15.800 believe any

00:35:16.180 of them.

00:35:17.280 They're

00:35:17.580 advocates.

00:35:19.260 Now,

00:35:19.460 if the

00:35:19.840 debunker

00:35:20.340 said,

00:35:21.820 and I

00:35:22.120 don't believe

00:35:22.540 this has

00:35:22.880 ever happened,

00:35:23.860 but if the

00:35:24.380 debunker

00:35:24.780 said,

00:35:25.080 you know,

00:35:25.260 I've got to

00:35:25.620 admit,

00:35:26.620 40% of the

00:35:27.720 things he

00:35:28.100 says,

00:35:28.640 they check

00:35:29.200 out.

00:35:30.200 But be

00:35:30.840 careful,

00:35:31.200 because 60%

00:35:32.080 doesn't,

00:35:33.540 I would

00:35:34.040 believe that

00:35:34.600 debunker.

00:35:35.820 I would

00:35:36.500 immediately say,

00:35:37.440 oh,

00:35:38.340 that's the

00:35:38.780 first credible

00:35:39.460 person I've

00:35:40.040 heard,

00:35:40.780 because they're

00:35:41.120 saying some

00:35:42.360 true,

00:35:42.780 some not.

00:35:43.880 That feels

00:35:44.640 like a fair

00:35:45.300 analysis,

00:35:46.720 because there's

00:35:47.240 no way he's

00:35:47.940 wrong about

00:35:48.400 everything.

00:35:49.900 Right?

00:35:51.200 I mean,

00:35:51.460 he produces a

00:35:52.260 lot of content.

00:35:53.060 He's not wrong 0.98

00:35:53.640 about everything.

00:35:55.300 That would be

00:35:56.000 almost impossible,

00:35:57.000 because,

00:35:57.720 you know,

00:35:57.960 he puts a lot

00:35:58.520 of intellectual

00:35:59.080 rigor in it,

00:35:59.920 whether it's

00:36:00.260 right or

00:36:00.560 wrong.

00:36:02.000 So,

00:36:02.600 anyway,

00:36:05.160 if we can't

00:36:06.300 predict,

00:36:08.380 here's my

00:36:09.040 point.

00:36:10.140 I don't

00:36:10.880 believe we

00:36:11.480 can even

00:36:11.920 agree what

00:36:12.700 the weather

00:36:13.100 was recently.

00:36:15.120 True or

00:36:15.780 false?

00:36:17.000 We have

00:36:17.680 trouble agreeing

00:36:18.720 what the

00:36:19.400 weather was,

00:36:20.940 even recently.

00:36:23.440 How the hell

00:36:24.180 are we going

00:36:24.500 to predict the

00:36:25.020 weather in

00:36:25.360 80 years?

00:36:25.820 Who predicted

00:36:28.960 that Klein

00:36:29.580 works would

00:36:30.360 find a model

00:36:31.400 that works?

00:36:32.180 Who predicted

00:36:32.860 that Elon

00:36:33.340 Musk would 1.00

00:36:33.900 offer an

00:36:34.340 X-Prize

00:36:35.000 for carbon

00:36:36.300 capture?

00:36:38.000 I mean,

00:36:38.460 there's just

00:36:38.840 so much

00:36:39.220 that's going

00:36:39.520 to be

00:36:39.660 different.

00:36:41.760 All right.

00:36:46.600 So,

00:36:47.280 what about

00:36:47.580 those gas

00:36:48.480 ovens?

00:36:49.580 There's a

00:36:50.140 whole bunch

00:36:50.420 of confusion

00:36:51.020 about whether

00:36:51.660 the Democrats

00:36:52.380 really wanted

00:36:53.200 to take away

00:36:53.780 your gas

00:36:54.240 oven,

00:36:54.500 or did

00:36:55.680 they really

00:36:56.140 want to

00:36:56.500 just ban

00:36:57.000 the future

00:36:57.620 ones,

00:36:58.640 or was it

00:36:59.660 all made

00:37:00.060 up?

00:37:00.720 I can't

00:37:01.220 even tell.

00:37:01.840 I'm not

00:37:02.140 even sure

00:37:02.460 it matters.

00:37:03.580 But is

00:37:05.460 it perfect

00:37:06.060 that they're

00:37:08.280 actually gas

00:37:08.980 lighting us?

00:37:11.400 That's a

00:37:12.000 little too

00:37:12.360 perfect,

00:37:12.820 isn't it?

00:37:13.740 It's

00:37:14.080 literally

00:37:14.620 gas light.

00:37:18.040 I mean,

00:37:20.800 it's less

00:37:21.560 about the

00:37:21.940 light,

00:37:22.340 but it's

00:37:22.580 more about

00:37:22.940 the gas.

00:37:24.260 And it's

00:37:25.640 just too

00:37:26.020 weird.

00:37:27.920 It's just

00:37:28.580 built into

00:37:29.060 the name

00:37:29.460 there.

00:37:31.840 All right.

00:37:33.600 So,

00:37:34.420 I guess

00:37:35.420 our gas

00:37:36.260 ovens might

00:37:36.940 be killing

00:37:37.800 us,

00:37:38.520 and of

00:37:39.880 course,

00:37:40.200 climate change

00:37:40.760 might be

00:37:41.100 killing us,

00:37:41.900 but not

00:37:42.660 those vaccinations,

00:37:43.840 damn it,

00:37:45.180 that you call

00:37:46.120 jabs.

00:37:46.700 couldn't be

00:37:48.380 that.

00:37:49.060 Couldn't be

00:37:49.440 that.

00:37:52.120 Let me

00:37:52.780 ask you a

00:37:53.180 question.

00:37:56.240 Regardless

00:37:56.800 of how much

00:37:57.800 damage is

00:37:59.100 or is not

00:37:59.740 done by

00:38:00.420 the jabs

00:38:01.700 themselves,

00:38:03.720 would you

00:38:04.740 agree with

00:38:05.260 the following

00:38:05.760 statement?

00:38:07.620 There is

00:38:08.640 a mass

00:38:09.180 hysteria going

00:38:10.020 on right

00:38:10.460 now about

00:38:11.780 the side

00:38:12.220 effects of

00:38:12.680 the jabs,

00:38:13.780 even if

00:38:14.500 it's true.

00:38:15.720 Like,

00:38:16.040 even if some

00:38:16.580 of the data

00:38:16.980 is alarming

00:38:17.900 and true,

00:38:18.860 wouldn't you

00:38:19.440 say that

00:38:19.940 there's a

00:38:20.280 mass hysteria

00:38:21.000 at the

00:38:21.440 same time?

00:38:24.840 I'm saying

00:38:25.220 more yes

00:38:25.720 than no's.

00:38:26.480 Because it

00:38:27.600 could be

00:38:27.940 true at

00:38:29.160 its base,

00:38:30.100 but also

00:38:31.120 blown up

00:38:31.760 into something

00:38:32.280 a little bit

00:38:32.800 bigger than

00:38:33.260 that.

00:38:34.380 To me,

00:38:34.820 it looks like

00:38:35.300 at the very

00:38:36.660 least it's

00:38:37.200 a mass

00:38:37.520 hysteria.

00:38:38.480 So I'm

00:38:38.980 going to

00:38:39.120 say the

00:38:39.360 one thing

00:38:39.760 that I

00:38:40.440 am sure

00:38:41.200 of at

00:38:41.660 this point

00:38:42.260 is that

00:38:43.540 some

00:38:43.800 percentage

00:38:44.340 of it

00:38:44.660 is mass

00:38:45.040 hysteria.

00:38:46.080 Because that's

00:38:46.480 what gets

00:38:46.820 you to

00:38:47.140 talk about,

00:38:48.260 I mean,

00:38:48.640 Lisa Marie

00:38:49.180 Presley was

00:38:50.920 not a

00:38:51.360 healthy-looking

00:38:52.060 person,

00:38:53.420 not healthy-looking,

00:38:54.500 and she had

00:38:54.860 a history of

00:38:56.700 drug abuse.

00:39:00.220 You know,

00:39:00.900 if you see

00:39:01.480 that one,

00:39:02.420 and you see

00:39:02.980 the football

00:39:03.780 player,

00:39:04.900 and your

00:39:05.460 anecdotes,

00:39:06.160 which actually

00:39:06.700 might be,

00:39:07.800 it might be

00:39:08.300 exactly what

00:39:08.940 you think

00:39:09.220 there.

00:39:10.060 I'm not

00:39:10.780 eliminating that.

00:39:11.880 I just

00:39:12.200 think it's

00:39:12.960 obvious at

00:39:13.580 this point

00:39:13.980 we've also

00:39:14.660 reached a

00:39:15.180 hysteria,

00:39:16.200 even if

00:39:18.560 there's

00:39:18.720 something at

00:39:19.100 the basement.

00:39:20.300 And at

00:39:20.540 this point,

00:39:20.920 I'm leaning

00:39:21.220 toward yes,

00:39:23.360 in case you're

00:39:23.840 wondering.

00:39:26.240 I'm leaning

00:39:26.900 toward the

00:39:28.340 signals are so

00:39:29.940 big, and

00:39:30.760 the pharma

00:39:32.220 companies appear

00:39:33.020 to have been

00:39:33.520 lying to us.

00:39:35.100 Now, I

00:39:35.460 heard a

00:39:36.380 hypothesis

00:39:37.000 from

00:39:37.620 Dyson.

00:39:41.300 What's the

00:39:42.220 name of

00:39:42.600 the

00:39:43.120 astrophysicist

00:39:45.860 Dyson?

00:39:47.740 What's his

00:39:48.300 first name?

00:39:49.300 He's got

00:39:49.580 like a

00:39:49.840 three-name

00:39:50.280 name.

00:39:51.960 Give me

00:39:52.300 his name.

00:39:54.380 Neil

00:39:54.800 Dyson.

00:39:59.320 Neil

00:39:59.660 Freeman

00:40:00.020 Dyson.

00:40:01.780 Okay.

00:40:02.960 I always

00:40:03.520 get his

00:40:03.820 name wrong.

00:40:06.920 Neil

00:40:07.480 Degrassi

00:40:08.240 Dyson.

00:40:11.300 Neil

00:40:11.540 Degrassi.

00:40:12.080 All right.

00:40:12.480 Sorry.

00:40:13.140 I apologize

00:40:13.620 to Neil

00:40:14.560 for

00:40:14.980 butchering

00:40:16.980 his name.

00:40:18.920 So he

00:40:19.420 had a

00:40:19.680 theory that

00:40:20.520 I thought

00:40:21.120 I heard

00:40:21.560 on the

00:40:21.780 podcast

00:40:22.200 that goes

00:40:22.520 like this.

00:40:23.520 Do you

00:40:23.680 remember when

00:40:24.240 the claim

00:40:25.580 was that the

00:40:26.160 vaccinations

00:40:26.700 were like

00:40:27.340 100%

00:40:28.500 effective in

00:40:29.460 stopping the

00:40:30.040 spread?

00:40:31.320 You all

00:40:31.760 remember that,

00:40:32.400 right?

00:40:32.800 It's hard to

00:40:33.340 forget.

00:40:34.560 And then it

00:40:35.080 turned out

00:40:35.580 not even

00:40:36.900 close.

00:40:38.460 Closer to

00:40:39.240 zero in

00:40:41.600 time.

00:40:42.400 Now here

00:40:42.800 was his

00:40:43.260 explanation

00:40:43.820 that I

00:40:44.740 had not

00:40:45.060 heard before.

00:40:47.140 And I'm

00:40:47.600 not going to

00:40:48.480 and for the

00:40:49.300 Klopbert's,

00:40:50.500 I'm going to

00:40:51.040 describe what

00:40:51.720 he said,

00:40:52.580 which is

00:40:53.260 different from

00:40:53.820 me agreeing

00:40:54.380 with it.

00:40:55.320 You get

00:40:55.940 that?

00:40:57.420 But I'd

00:40:58.120 never heard

00:40:58.460 this explanation.

00:40:59.180 And the

00:41:00.260 explanation was

00:41:01.220 that when

00:41:02.420 alpha was

00:41:03.740 essentially the

00:41:04.880 primary thing

00:41:05.700 they were

00:41:05.920 looking at,

00:41:06.860 it might be

00:41:08.240 true that

00:41:10.080 the original

00:41:10.860 vaccination,

00:41:12.820 it might be

00:41:13.320 true that

00:41:14.720 if the only

00:41:15.680 thing out

00:41:16.300 there was

00:41:16.680 alpha, it

00:41:18.020 might have

00:41:18.280 actually stopped

00:41:18.840 the transmission.

00:41:19.960 And that

00:41:20.320 might be what

00:41:20.840 they tested.

00:41:22.140 But since

00:41:22.660 the virus was

00:41:24.560 mutating

00:41:25.160 quickly,

00:41:26.820 a vaccination

00:41:27.900 has to be

00:41:28.600 sort of

00:41:29.320 perfect for

00:41:29.960 the virus

00:41:30.480 because a

00:41:32.080 virus will

00:41:33.660 mutate out

00:41:34.760 of, you

00:41:35.340 know, away

00:41:35.760 from the

00:41:36.100 vaccine so

00:41:36.800 quickly that

00:41:38.040 it's as if

00:41:39.280 there was no

00:41:39.760 immunity at

00:41:40.400 all.

00:41:42.140 So could

00:41:43.000 both of those

00:41:43.620 things be

00:41:44.080 true?

00:41:45.160 That in a

00:41:45.800 weird little

00:41:46.480 technical,

00:41:48.960 very temporary

00:41:49.980 time in

00:41:51.240 space, it

00:41:53.080 was 100%

00:41:53.920 effective,

00:41:54.900 but within

00:41:55.920 minutes, it

00:41:57.240 was zero

00:41:57.960 effective.

00:41:58.600 I'm going

00:41:59.360 to say

00:41:59.560 minutes just

00:42:00.260 to make

00:42:00.740 the point.

00:42:01.660 True.

00:42:03.280 Because I

00:42:04.000 do think if

00:42:04.780 they knew

00:42:05.100 exactly what

00:42:05.900 the virus

00:42:06.340 was, they

00:42:06.840 could make

00:42:07.280 a vaccine.

00:42:08.980 So that's

00:42:09.860 the fact

00:42:10.280 check.

00:42:11.460 Could you

00:42:11.860 make a

00:42:12.220 vaccine for

00:42:12.920 this if

00:42:13.520 the virus

00:42:14.000 never mutated?

00:42:15.540 I think the

00:42:16.140 answer is

00:42:16.480 yes.

00:42:18.160 I think the

00:42:18.660 answer is

00:42:18.980 yes.

00:42:19.380 And I

00:42:19.720 believe the

00:42:20.080 reason that

00:42:20.820 the researchers

00:42:22.940 said they'd

00:42:23.600 never be able

00:42:24.180 to make a

00:42:24.680 vaccine is

00:42:26.000 because of

00:42:26.300 the mutation.

00:42:27.840 I don't

00:42:28.540 believe anybody

00:42:29.400 ever said if

00:42:30.920 this virus never

00:42:31.820 changes, we

00:42:32.720 can't make a

00:42:33.280 vaccination.

00:42:34.600 Because I

00:42:34.920 think if it

00:42:35.300 never changes,

00:42:36.000 they can.

00:42:37.660 So I'm not

00:42:39.400 making a claim.

00:42:41.140 It's more of a

00:42:41.800 question.

00:42:42.840 But could that

00:42:43.680 explain why the

00:42:47.340 pharma companies

00:42:48.100 were claiming it

00:42:49.220 was 100%

00:42:49.860 effective?

00:42:50.460 Because remember,

00:42:51.480 it wasn't just

00:42:52.240 the pharma

00:42:52.720 companies.

00:42:53.760 It was other

00:42:54.420 people involved

00:42:55.160 and they were

00:42:55.460 making the

00:42:55.860 same claim.

00:42:57.220 So here's

00:42:59.300 what I think.

00:43:00.060 Here's my

00:43:00.760 current assumption.

00:43:03.720 Would you

00:43:04.320 agree with the

00:43:04.880 following statement

00:43:05.540 that the pharma

00:43:06.660 companies were

00:43:08.320 using motivated

00:43:09.700 analysis?

00:43:11.760 In other words,

00:43:12.300 they had to

00:43:12.580 analyze all this

00:43:13.920 data, but they

00:43:15.200 were motivated by

00:43:17.080 their own

00:43:17.620 objectives.

00:43:18.260 And so they

00:43:19.580 kind of saw

00:43:20.120 what they

00:43:20.380 wanted to see.

00:43:21.760 And even if

00:43:22.680 they knew they

00:43:23.220 should have

00:43:23.540 looked around

00:43:23.960 the corner,

00:43:25.840 they didn't.

00:43:28.260 It looks like a

00:43:29.220 motivated analysis.

00:43:31.360 Right?

00:43:31.660 Now, when I say

00:43:32.520 motivated, that

00:43:33.820 still leaves some

00:43:34.520 wiggle room about

00:43:35.440 whether there was

00:43:36.180 intent.

00:43:37.640 So I'm not

00:43:38.380 saying there was

00:43:40.020 illegal intent.

00:43:41.480 There might have

00:43:41.940 been.

00:43:42.700 I wouldn't rule

00:43:43.360 it out because

00:43:44.380 so much money was

00:43:45.200 involved, there

00:43:45.720 might have been

00:43:46.160 evil intent.

00:43:46.740 But there is a

00:43:51.300 thin explanation

00:43:53.720 that doesn't

00:43:55.640 require anybody

00:43:56.500 to have evil

00:43:57.080 intention.

00:43:58.100 And my problem

00:43:58.880 with this all

00:43:59.480 along is that so

00:44:00.980 many people were

00:44:01.800 involved, it would

00:44:02.640 be hard to imagine

00:44:03.520 they all had

00:44:04.560 financial intention.

00:44:07.420 But they all had

00:44:08.400 motivated reasoning.

00:44:10.200 They all had

00:44:11.000 motivated reasoning.

00:44:12.920 They wanted it to

00:44:14.060 work.

00:44:14.620 They wanted to be

00:44:15.420 heroes.

00:44:16.060 They wanted to

00:44:16.660 report it worked.

00:44:18.340 And everybody

00:44:19.200 wanted the pandemic

00:44:20.280 to end.

00:44:21.480 So I think it was

00:44:22.580 just wishful

00:44:23.160 thinking that

00:44:25.000 blinded them to

00:44:26.640 the obvious fact

00:44:27.760 that they should

00:44:28.460 have mentioned

00:44:28.900 the moment this

00:44:30.180 thing mutates,

00:44:31.640 the vaccine won't

00:44:32.900 work.

00:44:33.980 So all of these

00:44:36.160 people, by not

00:44:37.080 telling us directly,

00:44:38.780 this is what they

00:44:39.580 all should have

00:44:40.180 said in retrospect,

00:44:41.760 right?

00:44:42.060 Hindsight.

00:44:42.940 Hindsight makes us

00:44:43.860 all brilliant.

00:44:44.780 But in hindsight,

00:44:46.500 you wish they

00:44:47.120 had said, our

00:44:48.260 test shows it

00:44:49.240 really worked on

00:44:50.680 alpha, but we

00:44:52.380 don't think alpha

00:44:53.000 is going to last

00:44:53.580 long.

00:44:56.720 What do you

00:44:57.360 think?

00:44:59.240 I think that's

00:45:00.140 what they should

00:45:00.620 have said.

00:45:01.700 Because everybody

00:45:02.700 who worked on

00:45:03.660 these respiratory

00:45:04.480 viruses, I

00:45:06.240 believe every one

00:45:07.360 of them knew that

00:45:08.100 if it mutated,

00:45:10.280 the vaccine

00:45:11.200 wouldn't work.

00:45:11.720 they were just

00:45:12.700 hoping it would.

00:45:14.280 They were sort

00:45:14.800 of hoping that

00:45:16.720 if it didn't

00:45:17.580 mutate too

00:45:18.920 fast, and it 0.99

00:45:20.620 didn't mutate

00:45:21.300 too much, you

00:45:23.720 might be able to

00:45:24.500 get some purchase

00:45:25.960 on it.

00:45:26.780 But that was

00:45:27.480 motivated thinking.

00:45:29.440 There was nothing

00:45:30.260 to suggest that

00:45:31.600 that was going to

00:45:32.140 happen.

00:45:32.960 That was just

00:45:33.840 like optimism or

00:45:34.940 something.

00:45:36.220 So for sure,

00:45:38.900 we know that

00:45:39.540 they told us

00:45:40.100 things that were

00:45:40.660 not true, for

00:45:42.840 sure, we know

00:45:44.340 that they, meaning

00:45:45.040 pharma and the

00:45:45.840 governments, told

00:45:47.340 us things that

00:45:48.000 they should have

00:45:48.600 known were not

00:45:50.500 true.

00:45:51.600 That's where the

00:45:52.280 crime is, if there

00:45:54.320 is a crime.

00:45:55.300 That's where it

00:45:55.780 would be.

00:45:56.120 Would you agree?

00:45:57.240 Or do you believe

00:45:58.340 that they all knew

00:45:59.320 and they were just

00:45:59.860 playing it for the

00:46:00.460 money, like hundreds

00:46:01.800 of thousands of

00:46:02.700 researchers were all

00:46:03.640 in on it?

00:46:04.100 There probably

00:46:08.120 were a lot of

00:46:08.680 people in on it,

00:46:09.660 but I don't think

00:46:10.200 all of them.

00:46:14.540 My assumption

00:46:15.340 that they knew

00:46:16.160 it would mutate,

00:46:18.320 100% of the

00:46:19.320 people that I

00:46:20.120 heard ever talk

00:46:22.040 about it said

00:46:22.600 that, all of

00:46:23.880 them.

00:46:25.120 They all knew.

00:46:25.920 They all knew

00:46:26.600 because they'd

00:46:27.080 been trying for

00:46:27.640 years to make a

00:46:28.580 vaccine, and the

00:46:29.940 reason it didn't

00:46:30.600 work, it was

00:46:32.460 always the same

00:46:32.980 reason, because

00:46:33.900 it mutated, right?

00:46:35.040 They all knew

00:46:35.560 that.

00:46:36.180 Everybody in the

00:46:36.740 business knew it.

00:46:37.500 We didn't know

00:46:38.220 it, maybe.

00:46:40.760 I think even I

00:46:41.760 knew that.

00:46:45.840 Thomas Massey

00:46:46.660 makes a good

00:46:47.580 point, as he

00:46:48.640 often does.

00:46:51.480 So, you know,

00:46:52.220 you can't sue a

00:46:53.300 vaccine maker

00:46:54.200 because they have

00:46:55.940 special protection.

00:46:57.640 So if a company

00:46:58.320 makes a vaccine,

00:47:00.740 you can't sue

00:47:01.520 them if it goes

00:47:02.100 wrong.

00:47:04.360 But what if

00:47:05.140 they tell you

00:47:05.760 they're making

00:47:06.220 a vaccine, and

00:47:08.280 it doesn't stop

00:47:09.140 any transmission,

00:47:11.460 and they

00:47:11.960 probably knew

00:47:12.540 it?

00:47:14.120 Is that a

00:47:14.820 vaccine?

00:47:18.880 I'd say no.

00:47:20.960 And so,

00:47:21.520 therefore, I'd

00:47:22.080 say, if it's

00:47:23.740 not a vaccine,

00:47:24.720 then you can

00:47:25.260 sue them.

00:47:26.640 You can sue

00:47:27.400 them twice, once

00:47:28.380 for saying it's

00:47:28.980 a vaccine when

00:47:29.720 it's not, and

00:47:31.140 once because

00:47:31.880 somebody got

00:47:32.760 harmed, and

00:47:33.700 they didn't

00:47:33.960 have full

00:47:34.400 information.

00:47:35.920 But the

00:47:37.220 CDC apparently

00:47:38.280 evolved their

00:47:39.460 definition of a

00:47:40.460 vaccine during

00:47:42.140 the process.

00:47:43.500 So if you

00:47:44.720 were a vaccine,

00:47:45.580 you couldn't be

00:47:46.160 sued, but then

00:47:47.780 they made

00:47:48.140 something that

00:47:48.740 wasn't protective

00:47:49.840 of transmission.

00:47:51.620 And the

00:47:52.220 definition said

00:47:53.140 protective of

00:47:54.260 transmission.

00:47:54.760 So they

00:47:56.020 changed the

00:47:56.580 definition to

00:47:58.440 match what it

00:47:59.780 was doing, which

00:48:00.460 was protecting

00:48:01.520 people from bad

00:48:02.460 outcomes.

00:48:05.760 And then what

00:48:06.540 if it didn't do

00:48:07.080 that?

00:48:08.780 I'm not sure

00:48:09.560 that's the case.

00:48:10.660 But what if it

00:48:11.260 didn't?

00:48:12.360 So I think

00:48:13.260 Thomas Massey has

00:48:14.240 a real good

00:48:14.980 argument that I

00:48:15.800 would love to

00:48:16.340 see taken to

00:48:17.820 the Supreme

00:48:18.300 Court.

00:48:18.660 if it's only

00:48:21.500 legal because

00:48:22.480 it's a vaccine

00:48:23.680 by a

00:48:24.440 definition, and

00:48:25.660 then somebody

00:48:26.240 that you're

00:48:26.780 colluding with,

00:48:28.220 yes, colluding

00:48:29.380 with the CDC,

00:48:31.400 if the people

00:48:32.140 you're colluding

00:48:32.740 with change the

00:48:33.520 definition so

00:48:34.260 you stay

00:48:34.660 legal, is

00:48:37.560 that cool?

00:48:39.120 Is that cool?

00:48:40.540 I don't think

00:48:41.220 so.

00:48:42.000 I think I want

00:48:42.640 to see the

00:48:43.140 Supreme Court

00:48:43.800 work that out.

00:48:46.000 It's not obvious

00:48:46.820 to me if that's

00:48:47.640 necessarily illegal.

00:48:50.120 It's sketchy as

00:48:51.120 all hell.

00:48:52.460 But I'd like to

00:48:53.160 see, well, yeah.

00:48:55.200 I don't know if

00:48:55.700 lying is always

00:48:56.440 illegal, though.

00:48:59.420 Yeah, by the

00:49:00.160 time the vax

00:49:00.760 arrived, the

00:49:01.600 original screen

00:49:02.740 was already

00:49:03.200 dying out.

00:49:03.760 That is great.

00:49:07.220 I would like

00:49:08.020 to reiterate

00:49:09.840 something I say

00:49:10.780 once in a while,

00:49:11.460 but it's important

00:49:12.560 again.

00:49:13.940 I put this

00:49:14.760 under the

00:49:15.120 category of

00:49:16.240 youthful

00:49:16.980 dumbassery.

00:49:19.560 Was anyone

00:49:20.560 smart when

00:49:21.240 they were

00:49:21.480 young?

00:49:22.880 Was anybody

00:49:23.800 a genius until

00:49:24.600 they were 25

00:49:25.220 and then they

00:49:25.740 turned dumb?

00:49:27.160 I don't think

00:49:27.920 so.

00:49:29.460 So why do we

00:49:30.360 judge people by

00:49:31.400 what they said

00:49:31.980 in college?

00:49:33.580 So there's

00:49:34.480 another situation,

00:49:36.260 and I'm not

00:49:36.620 going to name

00:49:37.020 a name.

00:49:38.240 The reason I'm

00:49:39.100 not going to

00:49:39.480 name a name,

00:49:40.340 there's somebody

00:49:40.860 getting some

00:49:42.040 trouble for

00:49:42.500 something they

00:49:42.920 said at

00:49:43.240 college,

00:49:43.560 is that I

00:49:45.100 don't think

00:49:45.380 it's fair.

00:49:47.100 So don't

00:49:48.380 even Google

00:49:48.900 it.

00:49:50.140 Do me a

00:49:50.640 favor.

00:49:51.540 If you're

00:49:51.940 curious, who

00:49:52.680 are you

00:49:52.880 talking about?

00:49:53.400 Who is this

00:49:53.760 right?

00:49:53.980 Don't even

00:49:54.500 Google it.

00:49:55.820 Because we

00:49:57.120 should not be

00:49:57.800 judging people

00:49:58.460 by what they

00:49:58.960 did in college.

00:50:00.760 Unless it's

00:50:01.440 Greta, right?

00:50:03.460 Because she

00:50:03.980 was in college

00:50:04.500 when she was

00:50:04.920 doing it.

00:50:05.840 Or she was 0.61

00:50:06.540 that age.

00:50:06.920 So without

00:50:09.840 naming who

00:50:10.420 it was,

00:50:10.960 there's some

00:50:11.300 other person

00:50:12.140 who said

00:50:12.480 something super

00:50:14.380 inappropriate that

00:50:16.960 may or may not

00:50:18.180 have been in

00:50:18.920 an academic,

00:50:20.380 you know,

00:50:20.960 making a point

00:50:21.660 kind of context,

00:50:22.560 but it doesn't

00:50:23.080 matter.

00:50:24.000 Just whatever

00:50:24.820 they said under

00:50:25.640 the age of 25,

00:50:27.120 just let it go.

00:50:28.600 If people never

00:50:29.700 improved, then

00:50:31.640 yes, you should

00:50:32.680 judge them by

00:50:33.280 what they said

00:50:33.840 in college.

00:50:35.060 But if you

00:50:35.700 know that 100%

00:50:36.760 of people or

00:50:37.400 something close

00:50:38.020 to it,

00:50:38.980 evolve, you

00:50:40.700 know, we

00:50:40.920 evolve into

00:50:41.520 something different.

00:50:42.780 Might be better,

00:50:43.460 might be worse,

00:50:44.040 but it's a

00:50:44.380 different.

00:50:45.280 So why would

00:50:45.900 you judge

00:50:46.200 somebody today

00:50:46.880 by what a

00:50:47.820 different person

00:50:48.400 did?

00:50:49.120 You know,

00:50:49.320 somebody whose

00:50:49.720 brain wasn't

00:50:50.280 developed.

00:50:51.820 Anyway, I like

00:50:52.480 to say that

00:50:52.860 once in a while.

00:50:53.780 Now, there's

00:50:54.140 been a lot of

00:50:54.560 negativity in

00:50:55.220 the news,

00:50:55.620 and I thought

00:50:55.980 today, especially

00:50:56.800 because it's

00:50:57.200 Friday the 13th,

00:50:58.220 you needed some

00:50:58.900 positivity.

00:51:00.320 Would anybody

00:51:00.760 like some

00:51:01.240 positivity?

00:51:02.800 Because it's

00:51:03.440 all this negative

00:51:04.140 stuff.

00:51:04.980 Yeah, you need

00:51:05.820 some.

00:51:06.760 So I made a

00:51:07.240 little list, I

00:51:08.360 tweeted out

00:51:08.860 earlier, of

00:51:09.500 some positivity.

00:51:11.700 So on one

00:51:12.240 hand, the

00:51:12.740 COVID jabs

00:51:13.880 are, it looks

00:51:14.640 like they're

00:51:14.980 going to be

00:51:15.220 super overpriced.

00:51:17.520 Super overpriced.

00:51:18.620 In the context

00:51:19.740 of we already

00:51:20.980 have inflation,

00:51:22.540 and then these

00:51:23.240 jabs are going 1.00

00:51:24.480 to go to

00:51:25.000 like 400%

00:51:26.440 what they used

00:51:27.040 to be, etc.

00:51:27.660 But, on the

00:51:31.000 plus side,

00:51:32.100 apparently you

00:51:32.580 don't need

00:51:32.920 them.

00:51:35.360 So it

00:51:36.520 doesn't really

00:51:37.300 matter what

00:51:38.060 it costs

00:51:38.760 if you don't

00:51:40.380 need it.

00:51:42.540 Now, I'm

00:51:43.240 not giving you

00:51:44.140 medical advice.

00:51:45.640 You're not

00:51:46.040 getting any

00:51:46.500 medical advice

00:51:47.180 from me.

00:51:47.420 I'm not telling

00:51:47.900 you not to

00:51:48.360 take it.

00:51:49.080 I'm just

00:51:49.580 saying it's

00:51:50.060 literally true

00:51:50.760 that the price

00:51:51.320 is going up

00:51:51.840 400% at the

00:51:53.380 time that the

00:51:53.920 utility is down

00:51:54.800 about 1,000%.

00:51:55.800 So if the

00:51:58.100 price is going

00:51:58.760 up as the

00:52:00.060 usefulness is

00:52:00.820 dropping like

00:52:01.400 a rock, I

00:52:03.660 don't know

00:52:03.940 that that's

00:52:04.320 entirely bad

00:52:05.040 news.

00:52:05.760 I don't care

00:52:06.440 what it costs

00:52:07.040 because I'm

00:52:07.420 never going

00:52:07.740 to get it.

00:52:10.940 Backpedaling.

00:52:13.160 I'd like to

00:52:13.900 ask you,

00:52:14.360 coach, let 0.75

00:52:15.260 me ask, I'm

00:52:16.020 going to talk

00:52:16.340 to coach

00:52:16.780 here.

00:52:17.040 Coach, what

00:52:19.800 I like to

00:52:20.320 do is base

00:52:22.520 my decisions

00:52:23.480 on the

00:52:24.120 knowledge that

00:52:24.720 I have.

00:52:25.620 And then

00:52:25.980 if the

00:52:26.940 data changes

00:52:27.780 or we

00:52:28.380 learn more,

00:52:29.640 sometimes I

00:52:31.180 will modify

00:52:31.980 my opinion

00:52:32.900 to fit the

00:52:34.360 new data

00:52:35.080 which refuted

00:52:36.540 my old

00:52:36.980 opinion.

00:52:38.680 Now, I

00:52:40.060 know that

00:52:40.400 you call

00:52:40.740 that flip

00:52:41.400 flopping

00:52:42.040 and back

00:52:42.760 pedaling and

00:52:43.820 walking it

00:52:44.400 back.

00:52:45.480 But I'm a

00:52:45.960 little bit

00:52:46.320 curious how

00:52:46.900 you play

00:52:47.380 it.

00:52:48.560 When you

00:52:49.360 have an

00:52:50.100 opinion and

00:52:50.820 then the

00:52:51.260 information is

00:52:52.360 updated to

00:52:53.520 show that

00:52:53.860 your original

00:52:54.440 opinion makes

00:52:55.860 you look

00:52:56.240 like a

00:52:57.320 monkey, do

00:52:58.860 you say to

00:52:59.240 yourself, you

00:53:00.320 know, I was

00:53:00.820 pretty comfortable

00:53:01.480 with looking

00:53:01.980 like a

00:53:02.360 monkey.

00:53:03.280 I think

00:53:03.920 I'll ride

00:53:05.060 that horse.

00:53:06.760 Monkey horse.

00:53:07.660 Got too many

00:53:08.100 metaphors in

00:53:08.640 there.

00:53:09.420 But do you

00:53:10.800 keep your

00:53:11.180 opinion just

00:53:11.780 the same?

00:53:13.100 Or do you

00:53:13.920 say, and

00:53:15.460 I'll bet you

00:53:17.180 do this,

00:53:18.300 coach, I

00:53:19.540 feel like you're

00:53:20.100 this kind of

00:53:20.580 person.

00:53:20.860 I think

00:53:22.000 you're the

00:53:22.320 kind of

00:53:22.600 person who

00:53:23.040 can go

00:53:23.420 into a

00:53:23.920 fog of 0.95

00:53:24.500 war where

00:53:25.780 none of

00:53:26.420 the data

00:53:26.920 is reliable

00:53:29.060 and you

00:53:30.240 can have

00:53:30.620 certainty

00:53:31.100 from the

00:53:32.260 first moment.

00:53:33.860 And then,

00:53:34.760 based on that

00:53:35.560 certainty, it

00:53:36.580 really wouldn't

00:53:37.180 matter how

00:53:37.860 much the

00:53:38.320 information

00:53:38.840 changed, you

00:53:40.220 could keep

00:53:40.580 that same

00:53:41.300 opinion.

00:53:42.600 Because you

00:53:43.380 were certain

00:53:43.940 even when

00:53:44.960 there was no

00:53:45.380 information.

00:53:45.880 So, coach, is

00:53:50.060 that how you

00:53:50.420 play it?

00:53:51.920 Because, you

00:53:52.420 know, there

00:53:52.680 are a lot of

00:53:53.000 us who are

00:53:53.340 playing it the

00:53:53.880 dumb old way

00:53:54.700 where if the

00:53:55.620 data changes,

00:53:56.540 we'll update

00:53:57.060 our opinions.

00:53:58.000 But not you.

00:53:59.400 No, no.

00:54:00.060 You've got a

00:54:00.500 progressive kind

00:54:02.220 of a clopper

00:54:04.000 kind of opinion

00:54:04.780 where the

00:54:05.720 change in the

00:54:06.460 data should not

00:54:07.320 have any

00:54:08.020 difference to

00:54:09.600 your opinion.

00:54:11.880 Yeah.

00:54:12.800 You could,

00:54:13.460 it's cheating,

00:54:14.700 as somebody

00:54:15.080 says.

00:54:15.420 Yeah, it's

00:54:15.740 cheating, to

00:54:16.700 update your

00:54:17.720 opinion with

00:54:18.220 new information.

00:54:19.780 I hate to

00:54:20.260 do that.

00:54:20.760 All right.

00:54:21.300 Here's some

00:54:21.800 more positivity.

00:54:24.980 If you have

00:54:25.680 a son who's

00:54:26.440 a little bit

00:54:26.920 too rambunctious,

00:54:28.680 in the old

00:54:29.520 days, what

00:54:30.020 could you do

00:54:30.440 about it?

00:54:32.380 Nothing.

00:54:33.540 I mean, I

00:54:33.920 guess in the

00:54:34.300 old, old

00:54:34.640 days, you

00:54:35.020 could, like,

00:54:36.020 use corporal

00:54:36.740 punishment.

00:54:38.040 But, you

00:54:38.540 know, you

00:54:38.720 can't do that

00:54:39.200 anymore.

00:54:40.240 So, what

00:54:40.840 could you do?

00:54:41.880 If you had a

00:54:42.560 rambunctious

00:54:43.140 son, there's

00:54:43.700 nothing you'd

00:54:44.180 do.

00:54:44.380 But now,

00:54:44.820 on the

00:54:45.920 plus side,

00:54:46.520 you can

00:54:46.900 legally remove

00:54:47.640 their balls. 0.69

00:54:50.000 I'm no

00:54:50.540 doctor, but I 0.99

00:54:51.300 think that

00:54:51.660 calms them

00:54:52.120 down.

00:54:53.800 That'll settle

00:54:54.500 you down a

00:54:54.940 little bit.

00:54:55.480 Now, you

00:54:55.900 can't remove

00:54:56.540 their balls 0.98

00:54:57.060 unless they

00:54:58.760 want you to,

00:55:00.120 right?

00:55:00.400 Even though

00:55:00.760 they're children,

00:55:01.600 they still get

00:55:02.280 a vote.

00:55:03.160 So, you

00:55:03.740 can't really

00:55:04.160 go to your

00:55:04.720 son and say,

00:55:05.260 hey, I was

00:55:06.020 thinking of

00:55:06.520 removing your

00:55:07.100 balls and 0.99

00:55:07.580 transitioning you

00:55:08.460 to a woman

00:55:08.940 because it'd be

00:55:10.600 easier for me.

00:55:11.280 now, the

00:55:14.260 kid might

00:55:14.660 say, whoa,

00:55:16.040 whoa, whoa,

00:55:16.400 I'm totally

00:55:17.820 a boy, and

00:55:19.160 I have no

00:55:19.660 interest whatsoever

00:55:20.380 in transitioning.

00:55:21.260 But here's the

00:55:21.700 good part.

00:55:23.140 Children can

00:55:24.540 be hypnotized

00:55:25.600 really easily.

00:55:27.060 It's a real

00:55:27.560 thing.

00:55:28.300 When you learn

00:55:28.920 to be a

00:55:29.200 hypnotist, one

00:55:30.540 of the things

00:55:30.980 you learn is

00:55:31.580 children, you

00:55:33.100 don't even have

00:55:33.660 to work at

00:55:34.180 it.

00:55:35.380 You could

00:55:36.340 say two

00:55:37.140 sentences and

00:55:37.900 make a kid

00:55:38.380 hallucinate.

00:55:38.940 It's very

00:55:39.560 easy.

00:55:40.560 So, you

00:55:41.500 can convince

00:55:42.480 your child of

00:55:44.320 really anything.

00:55:45.480 Children are

00:55:45.940 sort of a

00:55:46.380 blank slate.

00:55:47.540 You can just

00:55:48.340 work on them.

00:55:49.260 So, if your

00:55:50.200 son is too

00:55:50.680 rambunctious, even

00:55:52.300 though it would

00:55:52.600 be totally

00:55:53.040 unethical, you

00:55:54.500 could probably

00:55:54.880 convince him to

00:55:55.660 have his balls 0.66

00:55:56.320 removed if he

00:55:56.980 worked at it

00:55:57.420 long enough.

00:55:58.260 So, that's the

00:55:58.860 good news.

00:56:00.600 Here's the more

00:56:01.260 good news.

00:56:01.920 Things could be

00:56:02.680 much worse.

00:56:04.500 Things could be

00:56:05.240 much worse.

00:56:05.760 For example, you

00:56:07.620 could live in

00:56:08.140 Canada.

00:56:08.940 I mean, it

00:56:13.360 could be worse.

00:56:14.860 It could be

00:56:15.300 worse.

00:56:16.540 Number four, again,

00:56:18.860 in the context of

00:56:20.640 inflation, wouldn't

00:56:24.200 you like to know

00:56:24.920 that some prices

00:56:25.640 are coming down?

00:56:26.740 And they are.

00:56:27.560 And they are.

00:56:27.960 For example,

00:56:28.720 fentanyl, because of

00:56:31.780 supply and demand,

00:56:32.960 the supply is

00:56:33.720 through the roof.

00:56:34.960 So, the price of

00:56:35.960 fentanyl, totally

00:56:37.020 reasonable.

00:56:37.560 And nobody talks

00:56:39.380 about that.

00:56:40.720 That's good for

00:56:41.320 inflation.

00:56:43.160 I don't think when

00:56:43.940 they calculate the

00:56:44.720 inflation, they

00:56:45.340 include the price of

00:56:46.240 fentanyl.

00:56:47.080 If they did, I

00:56:47.880 think it would

00:56:48.480 look a lot better.

00:56:49.580 Look a lot better.

00:56:53.240 Bad news.

00:56:54.080 Here's some more

00:56:54.500 good news.

00:56:55.140 Do you remember

00:56:55.540 when bad news used

00:56:57.100 to be all there was

00:56:58.000 on the news?

00:56:58.580 Like, if there was

00:57:00.400 something bad

00:57:01.040 happening, you turn

00:57:01.840 on the news, you

00:57:02.500 look, oh, it's like

00:57:03.760 a fire hose, all

00:57:04.940 this bad news coming

00:57:06.060 at me.

00:57:06.780 But now, fully 50%

00:57:10.540 of all the bad

00:57:11.600 political news is

00:57:13.800 suppressed.

00:57:16.320 Well, that's an

00:57:17.000 upgrade.

00:57:17.880 You only have to

00:57:18.640 hear half of the

00:57:19.320 bad news.

00:57:20.540 It's all about

00:57:21.300 Republicans.

00:57:22.240 But all of the

00:57:23.640 bad news about

00:57:24.280 Democrats, suppressed.

00:57:26.340 You never even

00:57:27.480 have to see it.

00:57:28.300 And that feels

00:57:28.780 good.

00:57:29.600 That's like a, it's

00:57:31.200 better than that

00:57:31.860 Andrew Huberman

00:57:33.580 breathing technique.

00:57:35.100 It just makes you

00:57:35.860 feel good.

00:57:38.920 And then, of

00:57:40.080 course, some of

00:57:42.100 you were worried

00:57:42.800 about some of our

00:57:44.520 national secrets

00:57:45.340 getting out, because

00:57:46.100 you heard about

00:57:46.540 Mar-a-Lago.

00:57:48.120 Mar-a-Lago, maybe 0.92

00:57:49.620 those national

00:57:50.500 secrets might get

00:57:51.340 out.

00:57:52.280 But these days, much

00:57:55.700 better situation.

00:57:57.340 So we don't have

00:57:58.260 Mar-a-Lago, now we

00:57:59.480 have Car-a-Lago.

00:58:02.580 Car-a-Lago.

00:58:03.620 That was Jesse

00:58:04.220 Waters' joke.

00:58:05.180 It was pretty good.

00:58:07.160 Car-a-Lago.

00:58:08.780 And our nation's

00:58:10.900 secrets are safe in

00:58:12.660 the bins next to

00:58:13.980 Joe's Corvette in

00:58:15.400 his garage.

00:58:16.940 So that's a lot of

00:58:18.040 good news.

00:58:18.600 And people don't

00:58:19.200 report the good

00:58:19.840 news.

00:58:20.600 I feel that

00:58:21.480 that's good.

00:58:24.700 Now, do you

00:58:28.800 think that the

00:58:29.380 headlines are all

00:58:30.800 organic, or do

00:58:31.960 you think that

00:58:32.640 we're always being

00:58:33.760 played?

00:58:35.800 What do you

00:58:36.540 think?

00:58:37.200 Do you think our

00:58:37.780 headlines are

00:58:38.360 organic, or are

00:58:40.100 we always being

00:58:41.220 played?

00:58:42.600 You're always being

00:58:43.280 played.

00:58:44.760 Because the

00:58:47.020 headlines could be

00:58:47.760 anything.

00:58:49.160 The headlines about

00:58:50.040 any politician could

00:58:51.360 be positive or

00:58:52.140 negative.

00:58:52.980 Could be anything.

00:58:53.540 So whoever

00:58:54.460 chooses the

00:58:55.120 headlines, you

00:58:56.620 know, they're

00:58:58.120 presenting a

00:58:59.180 narrative.

00:59:00.880 Interestingly, here's

00:59:03.360 a pro-vaccine

00:59:04.620 story, but not

00:59:05.540 about COVID.

00:59:06.540 Not about COVID.

00:59:08.280 So Wall Street

00:59:08.960 Journal has a

00:59:09.700 pro-vaccine

00:59:10.480 story about the

00:59:11.820 HPV vaccine, which

00:59:14.720 they say has been a

00:59:16.660 big part of

00:59:17.300 dropping U.S.

00:59:18.340 cancer mortality

00:59:19.540 by a pretty big

00:59:23.800 amount, like down

00:59:25.000 by a third or

00:59:25.640 something.

00:59:26.960 And it's

00:59:30.280 because of the

00:59:31.280 vaccine.

00:59:33.780 Do you see it?

00:59:36.040 Let me ask you

00:59:36.820 this.

00:59:38.020 Would there have

00:59:38.980 been a pro-

00:59:40.180 vaccine story if

00:59:42.460 we were not

00:59:43.080 questioning the

00:59:43.880 vaccinations about

00:59:44.780 COVID?

00:59:45.080 Isn't it

00:59:46.540 interesting that

00:59:47.180 there would be

00:59:47.460 this totally

00:59:48.740 unrelated story

00:59:49.880 that just happens

00:59:51.440 to highlight the

00:59:52.920 magical abilities of

00:59:54.200 vaccinations?

00:59:55.660 At just the time

00:59:56.660 the public is

00:59:57.720 starting to

00:59:58.240 question the

00:59:59.540 value of the

01:00:00.320 COVID vaccinations,

01:00:02.040 huh, the Wall

01:00:03.000 Street Journal has

01:00:03.740 a nice pro-

01:00:05.560 vaccination story.

01:00:07.540 Just a

01:00:08.260 coincidence?

01:00:08.540 Maybe, maybe, but

01:00:13.800 maybe not, maybe

01:00:15.500 not.

01:00:16.260 Yeah, it's

01:00:16.660 plausible that it's

01:00:17.460 a coincidence.

01:00:18.660 That is

01:00:19.040 plausible.

01:00:19.840 But in today's

01:00:20.940 environment, it's a

01:00:22.640 little harder to

01:00:23.320 assume that that's

01:00:24.160 the case, right?

01:00:27.980 But I'm glad

01:00:28.820 cancer's down.

01:00:32.460 There's been a

01:00:33.380 special counsel

01:00:35.000 has been named

01:00:37.040 to look into

01:00:38.980 the news that

01:00:41.700 Joe Biden has

01:00:42.760 a bunch of

01:00:43.400 several cases

01:00:45.680 of confidential

01:00:46.700 information.

01:00:47.680 Two for sure,

01:00:48.580 maybe some

01:00:49.100 third one.

01:00:50.600 And so they got

01:00:51.200 a special counsel

01:00:52.040 to look into

01:00:52.580 that.

01:00:53.420 My biggest

01:00:54.220 problem with

01:00:55.020 the special

01:00:55.400 counsel is I

01:00:56.140 don't know this

01:00:57.000 person's pronouns.

01:00:59.400 And it's a

01:00:59.760 little confusing

01:01:00.380 because the

01:01:01.220 person's name is

01:01:02.780 Robert Hur,

01:01:04.400 spelled H-U-R.

01:01:05.720 I think his

01:01:07.500 pronouns are him

01:01:08.580 and her, H-U-R.

01:01:11.320 That's the way I'd

01:01:12.060 go.

01:01:13.380 I'd go with my

01:01:15.360 pronouns are him

01:01:16.240 and her.

01:01:17.920 Yeah, that's how I'd

01:01:18.820 go.

01:01:19.380 But we don't

01:01:19.820 know.

01:01:23.340 And I also ask

01:01:24.280 myself if Robert

01:01:25.880 Hur married Dean

01:01:28.380 Cain's sister.

01:01:29.880 I don't know if he

01:01:30.500 has a sister and I

01:01:31.580 don't know if her

01:01:32.020 last name would be

01:01:32.680 Cain if she's

01:01:33.240 single.

01:01:33.940 But it's funny.

01:01:34.600 Just go with

01:01:35.220 this.

01:01:36.300 And they

01:01:36.860 hyphenated the

01:01:37.600 names of the

01:01:38.120 kids.

01:01:38.600 They would be

01:01:39.200 Hurricane.

01:01:41.420 Hurricane.

01:01:43.380 And I wondered

01:01:44.160 what would be the

01:01:44.920 funniest first name

01:01:46.480 to go with a

01:01:47.720 last name of

01:01:48.520 Hurricane.

01:01:50.560 I was thinking

01:01:51.340 Wendy.

01:01:53.380 Wendy.

01:01:55.200 How's that

01:01:55.780 Hurricane?

01:01:56.240 Well, it's

01:01:56.480 pretty Wendy.

01:01:57.620 It's pretty Wendy

01:01:58.260 out there in that

01:01:58.820 Hurricane.

01:01:59.080 Yeah.

01:02:01.300 Or how about

01:02:02.240 Ima?

01:02:05.240 Yeah, Ima Hurricane.

01:02:06.740 Yeah.

01:02:07.660 Killer.

01:02:08.400 Stormy.

01:02:08.760 Stormy.

01:02:09.860 Stormy Hurricane.

01:02:11.920 There you go.

01:02:12.500 Stormy Daniels.

01:02:14.340 Stormy Hurricane.

01:02:16.380 Camille.

01:02:18.320 Yeah.

01:02:19.320 Okay, Kansas.

01:02:20.300 I don't think

01:02:20.820 Betsy's that. 1.00

01:02:21.540 Why do people say

01:02:22.340 Betsy?

01:02:22.740 Is that funny?

01:02:25.780 Herder.

01:02:27.300 Herder.

01:02:28.760 All right, well,

01:02:30.000 Robert Herr is

01:02:30.780 going to look into

01:02:31.320 it, and so that

01:02:33.260 should take care of

01:02:33.940 it, right?

01:02:34.300 The good news is

01:02:35.240 that an objective

01:02:36.800 person has been put

01:02:38.600 in charge so that

01:02:39.520 we can...

01:02:40.180 What?

01:02:42.080 He's not?

01:02:43.840 What?

01:02:45.200 Oh, according to

01:02:46.740 Kash Patel, Robert

01:02:49.020 Herr is a, quote,

01:02:50.160 swamp monster who

01:02:52.040 was involved with

01:02:53.660 the Russia collusion

01:02:56.020 hoax.

01:02:58.880 Literally, the worst

01:03:01.660 person in the world

01:03:03.040 to be in charge of

01:03:04.940 this.

01:03:05.780 The worst person.

01:03:07.800 Okay.

01:03:08.960 Now, the left says

01:03:10.400 that this person

01:03:11.060 was appointed by

01:03:11.900 Trump.

01:03:14.260 Isn't this sort of

01:03:15.140 normal to have

01:03:16.140 lower-level people

01:03:17.240 approved by a

01:03:18.060 president, and the

01:03:19.500 president has no

01:03:20.240 idea who they are?

01:03:21.220 They could be the

01:03:21.760 other party.

01:03:22.840 I mean, it's lower-level

01:03:23.720 people.

01:03:24.160 It doesn't matter.

01:03:24.660 Does it?

01:03:26.680 Isn't it common for

01:03:28.600 people to get

01:03:30.080 nominated who are

01:03:31.320 not necessarily your

01:03:32.160 same party?

01:03:33.400 So I don't think that

01:03:34.160 means anything.

01:03:36.440 But it does look like

01:03:37.540 the fix is in, and

01:03:39.300 he looks like he'll be

01:03:40.080 the fixer for this.

01:03:43.540 Do you remember I was

01:03:44.880 telling you that it

01:03:45.780 looks like the

01:03:47.380 Democrats are trying

01:03:48.300 to take Biden out with

01:03:49.460 this document thing?

01:03:50.680 Do you remember me

01:03:52.060 saying that?

01:03:53.620 And I even put a

01:03:55.620 hashtag conspiracy

01:03:56.600 theory, because when

01:03:58.020 I said it, I thought,

01:03:59.000 okay, I know I'm going

01:04:00.660 a little too far here.

01:04:01.880 So I called it out as

01:04:03.340 my own conspiracy

01:04:04.140 theory.

01:04:04.800 And then I turned on

01:04:05.760 Tucker Carlson, and he

01:04:07.800 says it directly.

01:04:10.480 He just says it

01:04:11.440 directly.

01:04:11.760 So it does look like

01:04:16.880 the Democrats are

01:04:17.820 trying to take Biden

01:04:18.620 out.

01:04:19.260 It actually does look

01:04:20.320 like that.

01:04:21.380 Now, that doesn't

01:04:22.020 mean it's true, but

01:04:23.940 that hypothesis fits

01:04:25.980 everything we see.

01:04:28.340 The other hypothesis is

01:04:30.140 it's just business as

01:04:31.140 normal.

01:04:31.960 So you have the other

01:04:33.080 possibility.

01:04:36.620 But I ask this

01:04:38.180 question.

01:04:38.540 Can documents be

01:04:40.080 fingerprinted?

01:04:42.080 Because wouldn't you

01:04:43.180 want to know who's

01:04:44.240 touched those

01:04:44.960 confidential documents?

01:04:47.460 Wouldn't you like to

01:04:48.400 know?

01:04:49.500 And doesn't that make

01:04:51.180 a big difference?

01:04:53.780 What if you see

01:04:54.820 Hunter's fingerprints

01:04:55.900 on them?

01:04:58.840 That's a problem.

01:05:01.100 Do you think

01:05:01.540 Hunter's fingerprints

01:05:02.360 will be on any of

01:05:03.160 those documents?

01:05:06.200 I don't know.

01:05:07.200 There was a reason

01:05:08.120 that they were not

01:05:09.020 where they were

01:05:09.700 supposed to be.

01:05:11.400 Maybe it's an

01:05:12.180 accident.

01:05:13.420 Maybe not.

01:05:14.620 We'll see.

01:05:15.700 But here's what I

01:05:17.180 would look for.

01:05:18.560 If they do not

01:05:19.800 fingerprint the

01:05:20.660 documents, the fix

01:05:22.200 is in.

01:05:24.020 Can you agree on

01:05:24.880 that?

01:05:25.600 If they don't

01:05:26.620 fingerprint the

01:05:27.500 documents, then you

01:05:28.880 can know for sure

01:05:29.580 that it's just a

01:05:30.340 cover-up operation.

01:05:32.560 If they do

01:05:33.360 fingerprint them, you

01:05:34.460 can still wonder if

01:05:35.140 they told you the

01:05:35.740 truth.

01:05:36.620 But if they do

01:05:37.340 fingerprint them,

01:05:38.120 and they find

01:05:39.160 Hunter's fingerprints

01:05:40.360 on them, then I'm

01:05:41.820 willing, just as one

01:05:43.200 example, it could be

01:05:43.920 someone else.

01:05:44.720 But I'd be willing

01:05:46.740 to say, oh, that

01:05:47.660 looks like they

01:05:48.860 might actually be

01:05:49.560 serious about this.

01:05:50.960 Which would also

01:05:51.800 suggest the Democrats

01:05:52.820 are out to get rid

01:05:54.480 of Biden.

01:05:55.680 Here's my take on

01:05:56.780 Biden.

01:05:57.760 I think that Biden

01:05:58.780 was helped into his

01:06:01.300 election by lots of

01:06:03.140 powerful people behind

01:06:04.460 the scenes.

01:06:04.960 And then he came to

01:06:07.100 believe that the job

01:06:08.020 was his, and it was

01:06:09.340 totally up to him

01:06:10.160 whether he runs for

01:06:10.960 re-election.

01:06:12.600 So he said, yeah,

01:06:14.840 going to run for

01:06:15.400 re-election.

01:06:16.520 I don't believe that

01:06:18.000 the people who

01:06:18.720 installed him are

01:06:20.000 necessarily on the

01:06:20.900 same team.

01:06:21.920 And I think they

01:06:22.700 might need to take

01:06:23.420 him out, because he's

01:06:25.040 an old man who just

01:06:26.020 claims he should

01:06:26.960 stay.

01:06:27.240 So, have you

01:06:35.000 noticed that even

01:06:35.900 CNN is creating

01:06:37.020 this, CNN is

01:06:39.220 treating the Biden

01:06:41.460 documents like it's

01:06:44.240 as important as

01:06:45.040 Mar-a-Lago, and

01:06:47.080 it's the top story.

01:06:48.880 It's actually their 0.74

01:06:49.720 top story.

01:06:51.120 An anti-Democrat

01:06:53.380 story is CNN's

01:06:55.840 top story.

01:06:57.240 Does that mean

01:06:59.060 that CNN has

01:06:59.940 successfully, you

01:07:01.860 know, pivoted to

01:07:02.660 the middle, at least

01:07:03.400 on this story?

01:07:04.880 Or does it mean

01:07:06.160 that the signal is

01:07:08.180 that the Democrats

01:07:09.180 need to get rid of

01:07:10.200 Biden?

01:07:11.540 It doesn't mean

01:07:12.400 they had a meeting

01:07:13.060 and they colluded.

01:07:13.960 It could be just

01:07:14.500 everybody's on the

01:07:15.180 same page, so they

01:07:16.060 all know what to

01:07:16.580 do.

01:07:18.000 Yeah.

01:07:18.440 It does, it's a

01:07:19.460 little bit

01:07:19.820 suspicious.

01:07:21.420 I would expect

01:07:22.340 CNN to do a

01:07:23.340 whole bunch more

01:07:24.120 of minimizing it,

01:07:25.280 and they're not.

01:07:27.240 They're actually

01:07:27.820 maximizing it.

01:07:30.660 So it does look

01:07:32.400 like the fix is in,

01:07:33.780 but not necessarily.

01:07:37.440 All right, there's

01:07:37.980 not much to be said

01:07:39.080 about the fact that

01:07:39.840 the documents were

01:07:40.640 in a garage parked

01:07:42.000 next to a car.

01:07:44.080 You know, we can

01:07:44.500 make all the jokes

01:07:45.180 about how secure

01:07:45.900 that was or

01:07:46.500 wasn't, whatever.

01:07:47.140 Here's a story that

01:07:51.480 might be fake, but it

01:07:56.080 might be fake and

01:07:57.260 also tell us

01:07:58.060 something.

01:07:59.100 So I'm going to

01:07:59.880 say the odds of

01:08:01.060 this being true are

01:08:02.420 low, but the odds

01:08:04.260 of it meeting

01:08:04.800 something important

01:08:05.640 are very high.

01:08:07.180 And what I saw was

01:08:08.540 just one social

01:08:09.820 media account, so

01:08:11.980 it's not in the

01:08:12.940 regular news.

01:08:13.720 So at the

01:08:15.060 moment, the regular

01:08:16.080 news is not

01:08:16.800 reporting this, so

01:08:17.860 it might not be

01:08:18.400 true.

01:08:19.620 But there are

01:08:20.980 Wagner soldiers who

01:08:22.300 videotaped what they

01:08:23.980 claim are captured

01:08:25.240 Ukrainian drones that

01:08:27.540 are clearly outfitted

01:08:28.720 for chemical warfare,

01:08:31.220 meaning they have

01:08:31.880 tanks on them that

01:08:33.020 obviously are meant

01:08:34.560 to hold a chemical

01:08:36.180 or a gas.

01:08:37.720 They wouldn't have

01:08:38.480 any other reason to

01:08:39.300 be there.

01:08:39.580 And it's a bunch

01:08:40.560 of them.

01:08:41.300 It's like a room

01:08:42.120 full of drones,

01:08:43.940 small ones, that

01:08:45.000 have been modified

01:08:45.560 to carry some kind

01:08:46.380 of a gas canister.

01:08:49.500 Now, the Wagner

01:08:50.780 group claims, you

01:08:52.000 know, that they've

01:08:52.760 been used.

01:08:54.260 Now, here's the

01:08:55.140 thing.

01:08:56.740 Do you believe the

01:08:57.760 Wagner group?

01:08:58.860 No.

01:08:59.920 No.

01:09:01.000 No, you shouldn't

01:09:01.640 believe anything that

01:09:02.400 comes out of Ukraine.

01:09:04.040 But here's the only

01:09:04.980 thing I wonder.

01:09:06.780 Were the drones

01:09:07.600 real?

01:09:07.940 Do you think they

01:09:09.800 faked it by making

01:09:11.060 a whole room full of

01:09:12.700 drones that have

01:09:13.960 canisters attached?

01:09:15.540 Because that would

01:09:15.980 be a lot of work.

01:09:17.800 If you were planning

01:09:19.260 to fake it, how many

01:09:21.300 do you need?

01:09:23.480 You only need one.

01:09:25.860 You literally just

01:09:26.660 need one.

01:09:27.160 Because it would be

01:09:27.840 just as convincing as

01:09:29.160 a room full.

01:09:30.460 Because if you saw

01:09:31.240 one and you believed

01:09:32.060 it was real, you'd

01:09:33.060 think there were

01:09:33.600 more.

01:09:34.760 You know, you would

01:09:35.240 never believe there

01:09:35.940 was only one.

01:09:36.720 So if it were

01:09:38.220 fake, they only

01:09:39.740 need to show you

01:09:40.300 one.

01:09:42.060 Now, I believe it

01:09:43.900 is fake, but maybe

01:09:45.640 not for the reasons

01:09:46.700 that the drones are

01:09:48.460 not real.

01:09:49.440 It could be fake in

01:09:51.440 the sense that it's

01:09:52.300 Wagner's own drones.

01:09:54.280 It could be that the

01:09:55.380 Wagner group is the

01:09:56.860 one with making the

01:09:57.900 gas drones.

01:09:59.240 And since they're

01:09:59.840 definitely going to

01:10:00.540 get caught, what they

01:10:02.560 did was say, oh,

01:10:03.780 look at these

01:10:04.260 Ukrainians.

01:10:04.880 So if you ever see

01:10:05.640 one, the first time

01:10:07.660 you ever find one

01:10:08.480 that crashed, you're

01:10:10.720 going to say, oh,

01:10:11.260 the Wagner group

01:10:12.020 warned us about

01:10:12.760 this.

01:10:13.020 These are those

01:10:13.600 Ukrainian drones.

01:10:16.580 So this could be

01:10:18.140 the Wagner group

01:10:19.120 getting in front of

01:10:19.940 a story they know

01:10:20.740 is going to break,

01:10:22.060 the sooner or later

01:10:22.880 somebody's going to

01:10:23.540 find a drone with

01:10:24.260 a canister on it.

01:10:25.920 And so they're

01:10:26.620 making the case that

01:10:27.540 it's the other guys

01:10:28.280 before it happens.

01:10:29.960 That's what it

01:10:30.540 looks like.

01:10:30.940 But there's a

01:10:33.120 bigger question.

01:10:35.740 If those drones

01:10:36.780 are real, and

01:10:38.860 again, I don't

01:10:39.600 know why you

01:10:40.000 would have so

01:10:40.540 many of them.

01:10:41.260 If you're going

01:10:41.580 to fake it, you

01:10:42.120 don't need that

01:10:42.580 many.

01:10:43.200 It would be a

01:10:43.720 weird way to

01:10:44.220 fake it.

01:10:45.960 If those are

01:10:46.740 real, that's

01:10:47.240 what's coming.

01:10:48.740 And my book,

01:10:50.500 The Religion

01:10:50.960 War, written

01:10:51.840 in 2003, I

01:10:53.580 think, predicted

01:10:54.980 this.

01:10:55.700 And it's

01:10:56.040 predicted based

01:10:56.800 on the following

01:10:57.580 technology predictions.

01:11:00.940 that drones

01:11:01.780 would be

01:11:02.300 widespread and

01:11:04.480 hobby-sized.

01:11:07.600 That, you

01:11:07.860 know, regular

01:11:08.560 people could get

01:11:09.340 a drone that

01:11:09.980 could do a

01:11:10.440 lot of stuff.

01:11:11.340 So that, I

01:11:12.200 predicted in 2003,

01:11:13.580 that came true.

01:11:14.500 The other thing

01:11:15.300 I predicted is

01:11:16.980 that because the

01:11:18.400 drone won't be

01:11:19.220 able to carry a

01:11:19.920 lot of weight,

01:11:21.460 it's going to

01:11:22.420 want to use

01:11:22.940 weapons that

01:11:23.660 don't weigh

01:11:24.120 much.

01:11:25.420 And the

01:11:25.800 ultimate weapon

01:11:26.620 that doesn't

01:11:27.140 weigh much is

01:11:29.060 gas.

01:11:30.940 So it's

01:11:32.860 almost guaranteed

01:11:33.580 that somebody's

01:11:34.780 going to use

01:11:35.320 these for crop

01:11:37.120 dusting their

01:11:38.360 enemies.

01:11:43.220 So it's

01:11:44.020 coming.

01:11:45.040 Whether these

01:11:45.660 are real or

01:11:46.100 not, it's

01:11:46.560 definitely

01:11:46.800 coming.

01:11:49.780 And what

01:11:50.640 do you think

01:11:51.000 would be our

01:11:51.620 response if

01:11:52.580 our homeland

01:11:53.500 were attacked

01:11:54.240 by chemical

01:11:55.320 weapons and

01:11:56.020 drones?

01:11:57.020 Unless they

01:11:57.540 happened more

01:11:58.080 than once,

01:11:59.080 and it looked

01:11:59.440 like there was

01:11:59.980 nothing we

01:12:00.420 could do to

01:12:00.840 stop it.

01:12:01.440 What would

01:12:01.760 we do?

01:12:03.660 What would

01:12:04.260 the United

01:12:04.680 States do if

01:12:06.220 we knew the

01:12:06.860 drones were

01:12:07.420 coming from a

01:12:08.140 specific country

01:12:09.040 and they just

01:12:11.580 kept coming?

01:12:12.920 And imagine

01:12:13.420 what that would

01:12:13.900 do to our

01:12:14.320 cities.

01:12:16.000 Like people

01:12:16.680 wouldn't go

01:12:17.080 outdoors.

01:12:18.240 They'd stop

01:12:18.780 commuting.

01:12:19.920 I mean, it

01:12:20.180 would just

01:12:20.480 wreak havoc.

01:12:22.440 There's only one

01:12:23.200 thing we would

01:12:23.620 do.

01:12:23.800 We would pave

01:12:24.300 that country.

01:12:26.440 And that's

01:12:27.260 what my book

01:12:27.800 was about.

01:12:28.900 We will,

01:12:29.940 in all

01:12:30.380 likelihood,

01:12:31.840 there will

01:12:32.240 be drones

01:12:33.080 that terrorists

01:12:34.560 use with

01:12:35.240 chemical weapons.

01:12:36.220 In all

01:12:36.600 likelihood.

01:12:37.940 And if they

01:12:38.540 do it more

01:12:38.980 than once,

01:12:39.940 and it

01:12:40.280 becomes like

01:12:40.820 a pattern,

01:12:42.020 we won't

01:12:43.780 be able to

01:12:44.200 find the

01:12:44.820 specific

01:12:45.460 terrorists

01:12:45.940 probably.

01:12:48.080 We're going

01:12:48.640 to just

01:12:49.380 take out

01:12:49.740 the whole

01:12:49.980 country.

01:12:51.660 And we

01:12:52.960 just might

01:12:55.320 not have

01:12:55.660 any other

01:12:56.020 choice.

01:12:56.460 because we

01:12:57.220 wouldn't be

01:12:57.580 able to

01:12:57.820 live with

01:12:58.140 it.

01:12:59.080 And we

01:12:59.380 would do

01:12:59.660 whatever it

01:13:00.300 took.

01:13:00.920 And it

01:13:01.420 would be

01:13:01.680 genocide.

01:13:03.540 It would

01:13:04.080 be pure

01:13:04.640 genocide.

01:13:06.200 So that's

01:13:06.640 the setup

01:13:08.740 in the book.

01:13:09.800 The book

01:13:10.440 is what

01:13:10.900 happens when

01:13:11.580 genocide is

01:13:12.220 the only

01:13:12.680 solution.

01:13:16.160 What happens

01:13:16.880 when it's

01:13:17.220 the only

01:13:17.520 solution?

01:13:18.760 I hate to

01:13:19.380 use that

01:13:19.660 word solution

01:13:20.240 for obvious

01:13:21.880 reasons.

01:13:22.240 do you

01:13:25.600 think that

01:13:25.940 that's

01:13:26.180 likely?

01:13:27.660 Do you

01:13:27.920 think it's

01:13:28.240 likely that

01:13:28.940 that kind

01:13:30.080 of weapon

01:13:31.240 will come

01:13:31.720 to our

01:13:32.060 shores in 0.75

01:13:32.920 numbers?

01:13:34.060 And is it

01:13:34.640 likely that

01:13:35.200 we would

01:13:35.560 respond in

01:13:36.180 any other

01:13:36.700 way than

01:13:37.680 just eliminating

01:13:38.660 buildings in

01:13:39.880 the country?

01:13:40.780 We would

01:13:41.100 just make

01:13:41.400 sure everybody

01:13:41.880 had to live

01:13:42.300 outdoors.

01:13:44.820 I think

01:13:45.380 we just

01:13:45.640 eliminated it.

01:13:46.240 Yeah, we

01:13:49.580 get it.

01:13:51.780 Yeah, we

01:13:52.340 get it.

01:13:55.820 Is it

01:13:56.380 genocide if

01:13:56.960 it's self-defense?

01:13:57.860 Yeah, it

01:13:58.220 would be.

01:13:59.000 Because it

01:13:59.500 would be

01:13:59.740 genocide

01:14:00.200 against

01:14:00.720 99.9999%

01:14:03.360 innocent

01:14:03.840 people.

01:14:06.040 Depends on

01:14:06.600 the president?

01:14:07.600 I don't

01:14:08.180 think so.

01:14:09.440 See, that's

01:14:10.080 the hard

01:14:10.360 part.

01:14:10.800 I don't

01:14:11.160 think it

01:14:11.500 depends who's

01:14:12.060 in charge.

01:14:13.060 Because they'll

01:14:13.440 only have one

01:14:13.980 choice,

01:14:14.960 eventually.

01:14:16.240 that's not

01:14:19.560 woke.

01:14:20.940 Send in

01:14:21.400 those robot

01:14:21.940 soldiers.

01:14:25.640 All right.

01:14:26.520 That's

01:14:26.860 enough for

01:14:27.200 today.

01:14:28.360 I'm going

01:14:28.680 to go do

01:14:29.020 something else.

01:14:29.700 I think

01:14:30.060 you'd agree.

01:14:31.300 This is the

01:14:31.800 best live

01:14:32.240 stream you've

01:14:32.700 seen so

01:14:33.120 far today.

01:14:34.320 And it's

01:14:35.120 only going

01:14:35.420 to get

01:14:35.600 better.

01:14:36.760 And remember,

01:14:38.080 everything that

01:14:38.980 you've been

01:14:39.320 told is

01:14:40.020 backwards,

01:14:41.340 including

01:14:41.940 Friday the

01:14:43.140 13th.

01:14:44.180 It's a

01:14:44.540 good luck

01:14:44.880 day.

01:14:45.620 It's a

01:14:45.980 good luck

01:14:46.360 day.

01:14:47.560 Go out

01:14:47.880 and get

01:14:48.060 yourself

01:14:48.340 some good

01:14:48.700 luck.

01:14:50.060 And bye

01:14:50.560 for now,

01:14:50.980 YouTube.

01:14:51.380 I'm going

01:14:51.580 to talk to

01:14:51.940 the subscribers

01:14:52.720 for a little

01:14:53.260 bit on

01:14:53.680 locals,

01:14:54.300 because they're

01:14:55.200 special.

01:14:56.700 Bye for

01:14:57.280 now.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - January 13, 2023

Episode 1987 Scott Adams： Joe Biden's Garage, And The Government Lying To You About Everything

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript