Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1988 Scott Adams： Everything The News Gets Wrong Because They Are Not Engineers

00:00:00.000 Good morning ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the highlight of civilization.

00:00:09.120 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams and I'm pretty sure you've never enjoyed anything

00:00:13.840 as much as you can enjoy the next approximately one hour.

00:00:18.840 No, I'm not bound by any hard guidelines of timing.

00:00:23.120 No, not at all.

00:00:24.360 I can make it as long or as short as I want.

00:00:27.740 Don't make any jokes.

00:00:29.180 Now, how would you like to take your experience up to levels that nobody's ever seen?

00:00:37.120 Ever?

00:00:38.140 And all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass of tank or chalice of dine, a canteen jug or

00:00:42.060 flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:44.080 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:45.240 I like coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine of the day, the thing

00:00:53.160 that makes everything better.

00:00:54.100 It's called the simultaneous sip and it happens now.

00:00:55.820 Go.

00:00:59.180 Hold it, hold it, hold it, hold it, everybody.

00:01:02.340 Hold it.

00:01:06.160 We have a request to wait.

00:01:08.060 Somebody wasn't quite ready.

00:01:10.280 Okay, this is the real one.

00:01:12.020 First one didn't count.

00:01:14.040 Go.

00:01:14.660 Go.

00:01:15.100 Okay, I think we got everybody on board there.

00:01:21.480 We will leave no viewer behind.

00:01:25.640 We're like the Marines that way.

00:01:28.580 While President Biden was bragging, the gas is down more than $1.70 from its peak.

00:01:35.460 That adds up to around $180 per month for a typical family.

00:01:42.760 That's money in your pocket, not spent at the pump, he says.

00:01:46.820 Money in your pocket.

00:01:48.560 Yeah.

00:01:48.760 Does this kind of analysis remind you of anything?

00:01:55.600 Is there any fictional character who might be well known for saying this sort of thing?

00:02:04.000 And might that fictional character be a comic?

00:02:09.820 And might it involve a boss with pointy hair? 0.78

00:02:13.860 And might it involve a boss who says,

00:02:17.380 Hey, we could have wasted a million dollars this year,

00:02:21.160 but we only wasted half a million,

00:02:23.520 and that's money in your pocket.

00:02:25.740 That's money in your pocket.

00:02:27.540 I could have done worse.

00:02:29.900 So, you're welcome.

00:02:31.480 That literally is a Dilbert comic.

00:02:37.060 Not just one.

00:02:38.460 I'm pretty sure I've hit that theme a few times.

00:02:41.480 And you know what?

00:02:42.420 I'm going to hit it again.

00:02:44.700 I'll probably hit that theme again.

00:02:47.260 Yes, bragging about how things could have been so much worse,

00:02:51.520 and therefore, because they're not worse,

00:02:54.600 money in your pocket.

00:02:56.160 That's money in your pocket, baby.

00:02:57.580 Do you see there's a new Martin Luther King statue?

00:03:03.860 Some people say that viewed from a certain angle,

00:03:07.200 it looks a little different than maybe what the creator hoped.

00:03:13.480 I think they're suggesting it looks like a giant,

00:03:16.960 oh, I can't say that on live stream,

00:03:19.960 a giant thing.

00:03:22.040 But that's only from one point of view.

00:03:25.800 Now, I think I saw a Mike Cernovich tweet

00:03:29.580 asking what we do about this statue.

00:03:33.800 Because it turns out, at the same time,

00:03:36.580 the statue's going up.

00:03:37.760 I think it was Politico had an article about

00:03:39.660 some researcher, biographer,

00:03:42.280 who's come up with a bunch of dirt on MLK.

00:03:45.840 Apparently, MLK would not have survived the Me Too era,

00:03:49.280 if the allegations are correct.

00:03:52.600 And so now you have an interesting situation.

00:03:55.600 What happens if the most storied and famous leader

00:04:01.920 of the black community turns out to be a Me Too person,

00:04:06.500 and then maybe a criminal of the female part of the public, 0.98

00:04:12.820 and other people, too, as well?

00:04:14.240 That would be an interesting battle of power, wouldn't it?

00:04:19.860 Who do you think would win?

00:04:21.740 Who has more power in today's world?

00:04:25.000 Black America or female America? 1.00

00:04:30.960 I would think female, because there are more of them, right? 0.97

00:04:33.640 Numbers.

00:04:35.300 More than half of the world, I think.

00:04:38.100 Or more than half of the United States, anyway.

00:04:39.600 So, we'll see.

00:04:42.720 But I think it's optimistic to assume

00:04:48.020 that that statue will not be pulled down.

00:04:51.320 Now, one reason it might not be pulled down

00:04:54.000 is if it's mostly women who are complaining. 1.00

00:04:58.940 They don't have the upper body strength,

00:05:01.580 so statue's safe.

00:05:03.200 No, I'm just joking.

00:05:07.280 Because everybody cares about Me Too, not just women.

00:05:10.480 So, I'm just being provocative.

00:05:14.340 I don't think that statue's going to come down.

00:05:16.280 Nor do I think it should.

00:05:18.060 But it does raise some interesting questions

00:05:21.040 in our complicated times.

00:05:24.160 All right.

00:05:24.880 I may have told you before,

00:05:26.380 but there's a phrase on Twitter

00:05:28.920 that will get you instantly blocked.

00:05:31.040 And I don't care if you say it to me

00:05:33.640 or someone else.

00:05:36.180 If you use these words about anybody,

00:05:39.760 doesn't matter if it's about me,

00:05:41.900 if you use this to explain anybody

00:05:44.540 or to talk to anybody,

00:05:45.940 you are instantly blocked.

00:05:47.720 And here's the phrase.

00:05:50.240 You're better than this.

00:05:52.420 You're better than this.

00:05:55.000 Nope.

00:05:56.340 No.

00:05:57.740 I am exactly as good as whatever I'm doing.

00:06:01.040 If there's one thing I'm never going to back off from,

00:06:06.340 you are what you do.

00:06:08.500 You are what you do.

00:06:11.200 If you do something and somebody doesn't like it,

00:06:14.020 you're not better than that.

00:06:15.540 You're exactly that.

00:06:17.320 And you might be happy about it.

00:06:18.640 You might not be apologizing at all.

00:06:20.300 You are that.

00:06:21.320 Yes, I did that.

00:06:22.980 That is who I am.

00:06:23.900 And here's why I don't like the phrase

00:06:27.440 you're better than that.

00:06:28.920 Because it's emotionally manipulative

00:06:31.300 and it acts as though

00:06:33.500 I should organize my life

00:06:36.200 around a stranger's approval.

00:06:39.160 Why would I organize my life

00:06:40.860 around the approval of a stranger?

00:06:43.200 And why does that person think

00:06:44.620 they can impose that on me?

00:06:46.460 And why would they be dumb enough

00:06:48.000 to say it in public?

00:06:49.620 That their opinion should monitor

00:06:51.760 and should change my behavior

00:06:54.340 and make me a different person?

00:06:56.840 I don't think there's anything

00:06:57.940 that bothers me more than that phrase

00:06:59.700 because it's just manipulative.

00:07:02.420 How many of you would agree

00:07:03.900 it's just pure manipulation?

00:07:05.760 And here's the other thing.

00:07:08.740 Anybody who would use that phrase,

00:07:10.800 especially in public,

00:07:12.920 would you want to be friends with that person?

00:07:15.300 Because that tells you

00:07:17.300 where their mentality is, right?

00:07:22.500 All right.

00:07:25.980 Okay.

00:07:26.880 Recommendation there.

00:07:30.540 You know,

00:07:31.660 as much as I appreciate

00:07:34.220 the super comments on YouTube,

00:07:36.520 I think YouTube should get rid of them.

00:07:38.540 What do you think?

00:07:39.800 Because when you stop to read

00:07:41.180 a super comment,

00:07:43.360 often it's not on the topic

00:07:45.040 you're talking about.

00:07:46.360 And I feel like,

00:07:48.240 you know,

00:07:48.520 the law of reciprocity,

00:07:51.080 when somebody does anything for you,

00:07:53.240 you just automatically feel like

00:07:54.600 you owe them something.

00:07:55.480 We're all designed that way.

00:07:56.940 So the problem with this model

00:07:58.240 is that,

00:07:59.920 especially if it's people I like,

00:08:01.460 like sometimes they'll come from people

00:08:02.820 I know personally

00:08:04.120 and I like them.

00:08:05.460 But if it's not on the same topic,

00:08:08.660 it's not good for everybody else.

00:08:10.480 So it's like paying $20

00:08:11.700 to go to the top of the line.

00:08:15.180 Now,

00:08:15.420 if you go to the top of the line

00:08:16.580 on the topic we're talking about,

00:08:18.760 I think that's cool.

00:08:21.300 You know,

00:08:21.840 because if you make a good point,

00:08:23.520 it doesn't matter

00:08:24.060 if you paid or didn't pay.

00:08:25.560 But if it's a different topic,

00:08:28.120 that's probably not the best way

00:08:29.360 to use the super chat.

00:08:30.600 So just keep that in mind.

00:08:32.680 You know,

00:08:32.940 the feature is there

00:08:34.400 so you can use it

00:08:35.220 like there's no crime.

00:08:36.680 But just as a preference,

00:08:38.520 I would rather you not give me money.

00:08:40.780 Is that fair?

00:08:42.540 I would rather you not give me money

00:08:44.600 in that particular way.

00:08:47.860 But thank you.

00:08:49.740 Let me show some gratitude.

00:08:52.040 Thank you.

00:08:52.740 Because I think the people who do it

00:08:53.880 usually have the right,

00:08:55.080 you know,

00:08:55.540 the right thought in mind.

00:08:57.440 And I appreciate that.

00:09:00.220 All right.

00:09:00.800 The Trump Organization,

00:09:01.960 I guess,

00:09:02.320 is going to pay

00:09:02.980 a $1.6 million fine,

00:09:05.220 a criminal fine.

00:09:07.420 The news likes to make sure

00:09:09.040 you know it's a criminal fine

00:09:10.220 for what their CTO apparently did.

00:09:14.860 Now,

00:09:15.400 I'm having a little trouble

00:09:16.380 understanding this story.

00:09:18.600 And maybe somebody who's

00:09:19.820 maybe more clued into

00:09:22.440 either the specifics of this case

00:09:25.340 or the legal structure of the world

00:09:29.540 maybe can sort this out for me.

00:09:32.160 So here's what I understand.

00:09:34.320 The,

00:09:34.940 oh, is this CFO?

00:09:36.240 I'm sorry.

00:09:36.880 CFO.

00:09:37.540 The financial guy,

00:09:38.460 not the technical guy.

00:09:39.840 Yeah.

00:09:40.100 So the CFO of Trump Organization,

00:09:44.140 I accidentally said CTO,

00:09:46.480 but the CFO,

00:09:47.440 the financial guy,

00:09:49.080 apparently was in charge of,

00:09:51.140 you know,

00:09:51.420 the accounting

00:09:51.960 and how things were recorded.

00:09:54.980 and he paid himself

00:09:58.400 without going through payroll

00:10:01.400 by having the Trump Organization

00:10:03.980 pay some of his expenses directly.

00:10:06.760 Now,

00:10:07.140 that's illegal

00:10:07.800 because it didn't get taxed

00:10:09.800 in the way that the system requires it.

00:10:12.200 Now,

00:10:12.620 here's the problem.

00:10:14.520 Because it happened

00:10:15.760 and because the CFO is an officer

00:10:19.240 of the company,

00:10:21.020 the company is also on the hook

00:10:23.560 because although it was one person

00:10:26.100 who seems to be involved,

00:10:27.320 as far as we know,

00:10:28.000 just one person,

00:10:29.120 and the one person

00:10:30.080 was the person who does it

00:10:31.020 for the company.

00:10:32.520 So,

00:10:33.160 it's a weird situation

00:10:34.260 where the Trump Organization

00:10:36.460 was a victim of a crime

00:10:38.460 and they have to pay a penalty

00:10:41.440 for being a victim of a crime.

00:10:45.520 Now,

00:10:46.060 it's a little unclear

00:10:46.980 if the Trump Organization

00:10:48.700 made or lost any money

00:10:51.320 because of the way this was handled.

00:10:54.280 They should have come out

00:10:55.280 about the same.

00:10:57.240 You know,

00:10:57.420 certainly it would not have been,

00:10:58.920 it would not have been

00:10:59.860 a big enough crime

00:11:00.760 that the Trump Organization

00:11:02.900 would have had any intention

00:11:05.280 to do it.

00:11:06.500 Here's how you know

00:11:07.240 there's no intention

00:11:08.100 because it wouldn't be worth it.

00:11:11.320 The Trump Organization

00:11:12.580 would save maybe nothing,

00:11:15.660 you know,

00:11:15.880 or maybe a little bit

00:11:17.200 on some kind of payroll-related tax

00:11:20.040 that you wouldn't,

00:11:21.020 if it's just a straight expense.

00:11:22.760 In both cases,

00:11:23.880 it probably got,

00:11:24.560 it was written off

00:11:25.400 as an expense,

00:11:26.900 right?

00:11:27.760 So,

00:11:28.220 if the company pays it in payroll,

00:11:29.560 that's a write-off,

00:11:31.120 but if they pay it directly,

00:11:33.160 that's another,

00:11:34.160 but there's a little,

00:11:34.880 little extra

00:11:35.660 that you pay,

00:11:37.160 a little extra taxes

00:11:37.960 to pay to support

00:11:39.280 an employee

00:11:40.300 that you don't pay

00:11:41.000 for a regular expense.

00:11:42.300 So there might have been

00:11:43.200 like a little benefit

00:11:44.400 to the Trump Organization,

00:11:46.340 but given the size

00:11:47.820 of the organization

00:11:48.560 and the tiny amount

00:11:50.880 of benefit,

00:11:51.860 really just the

00:11:52.660 employee-related taxes

00:11:54.360 for one person,

00:11:55.880 there's no way

00:11:57.660 that anybody

00:11:59.240 besides the benefactor

00:12:01.300 would have okayed that.

00:12:03.760 In other words,

00:12:04.620 had Trump

00:12:06.080 or,

00:12:07.160 you know,

00:12:08.100 Don Jr.

00:12:09.160 or anybody

00:12:09.940 who was in charge,

00:12:11.060 if any of them

00:12:12.000 had been presented

00:12:12.900 with this option,

00:12:14.320 hey,

00:12:15.160 how about you pay

00:12:15.920 my expenses

00:12:16.600 instead of paying me?

00:12:18.620 I'll save a lot

00:12:19.580 on taxes.

00:12:20.780 You'll save a little bit,

00:12:22.940 but if you get caught,

00:12:25.120 it's like really bad.

00:12:27.060 Nobody would approve that

00:12:28.120 because the cost-benefit

00:12:30.020 doesn't make any sense.

00:12:31.580 You would never

00:12:31.980 put yourself

00:12:32.600 in that position.

00:12:34.000 So,

00:12:34.920 am I interpreting

00:12:36.120 this incorrectly,

00:12:37.800 that the Trump Organization

00:12:38.980 is a victim

00:12:39.900 of a crime

00:12:40.660 that one individual

00:12:43.180 in the company

00:12:43.880 committed.

00:12:45.540 There were two victims.

00:12:46.940 One is the taxpayers,

00:12:48.380 us,

00:12:49.440 and the other victim

00:12:50.300 is the Trump Organization

00:12:51.460 because there's no way

00:12:52.780 in the world

00:12:53.200 they would have

00:12:53.780 greenlit those activities.

00:12:56.360 The risk-reward

00:12:57.640 wouldn't make no sense,

00:12:59.040 no sense at all.

00:13:00.500 Right?

00:13:01.540 So,

00:13:02.760 the fact that this

00:13:04.780 is being reported

00:13:05.520 like it's some kind

00:13:06.340 of a Trump-related crime

00:13:07.920 when they're literally

00:13:09.260 the victim of the crime,

00:13:10.660 literally the victim

00:13:12.000 of the crime,

00:13:12.580 I think.

00:13:13.880 There's no upside

00:13:14.800 for them.

00:13:16.900 All right,

00:13:17.180 so that's your first

00:13:18.240 backwards news of the day.

00:13:21.580 So,

00:13:22.160 I tweeted yesterday

00:13:23.100 a,

00:13:23.520 you know,

00:13:24.500 strange little thought

00:13:26.060 and I said that

00:13:26.720 I think it would be

00:13:27.200 a good standard

00:13:27.900 for social behavior

00:13:29.060 to ignore anything

00:13:30.600 a person said

00:13:31.380 before the age of 25

00:13:32.720 because young people

00:13:34.840 are works in progress

00:13:35.840 and we usually improve.

00:13:37.400 Now,

00:13:37.880 this is based on

00:13:38.580 a specific story

00:13:39.680 in the news

00:13:40.240 that I'm not

00:13:40.720 going to repeat

00:13:41.320 to be consistent.

00:13:43.580 I'm not going

00:13:44.200 to repeat the story

00:13:44.960 because I don't think

00:13:45.740 we should be talking

00:13:46.520 about what somebody

00:13:47.340 said when they were

00:13:48.080 a young person.

00:13:50.080 Right?

00:13:50.400 So,

00:13:50.780 I don't even want

00:13:51.280 to give you enough

00:13:51.800 details that you

00:13:52.480 could Google it.

00:13:53.800 That's how much

00:13:54.400 I don't want

00:13:54.920 to talk about it.

00:13:56.020 But the concept,

00:13:56.960 I think,

00:13:57.180 is important.

00:13:58.500 So,

00:13:58.840 you know,

00:13:59.860 I looked at

00:14:01.080 the tweet today

00:14:02.200 and it's like

00:14:02.780 1.9 million views.

00:14:05.400 Now,

00:14:08.080 a normal tweet

00:14:08.760 of mine

00:14:09.080 might get like

00:14:09.740 10,000

00:14:11.160 or 50,000 views.

00:14:13.180 It's got

00:14:13.780 1.9 million views.

00:14:16.820 So,

00:14:17.420 I was like,

00:14:17.840 what's going on here?

00:14:18.720 And then I go,

00:14:19.120 oh,

00:14:19.580 Elon Musk

00:14:20.220 commented.

00:14:22.420 So,

00:14:22.680 Elon Musk

00:14:23.140 commented,

00:14:23.960 if not,

00:14:24.780 perhaps,

00:14:25.260 you know,

00:14:25.540 age 30.

00:14:27.880 Which makes me

00:14:28.720 wonder if there

00:14:29.320 was something

00:14:29.700 specific he said

00:14:30.780 or did

00:14:31.180 between his

00:14:32.440 ages of 25

00:14:33.340 and 30.

00:14:35.780 So,

00:14:36.400 I thought,

00:14:36.680 wow,

00:14:37.640 you know,

00:14:38.200 one Musk

00:14:39.360 commented.

00:14:39.960 He didn't even

00:14:40.400 retweet it.

00:14:40.980 He just commented

00:14:41.680 and I got

00:14:42.820 1.9 million views.

00:14:45.460 Okay.

00:14:46.360 So,

00:14:47.040 topic number two.

00:14:49.160 I think I mentioned

00:14:49.880 this yesterday.

00:14:50.500 Steve Malloy,

00:14:52.040 his Twitter name

00:14:54.440 is

00:14:54.640 at Junk Science

00:14:55.460 and he tweeted

00:14:57.660 a,

00:14:58.900 some

00:15:00.340 statistics

00:15:01.060 from the

00:15:01.760 NOAA,

00:15:03.240 the National

00:15:03.780 Organization

00:15:04.580 of

00:15:05.020 Alcoholics

00:15:06.620 Anonymous.

00:15:08.000 Now,

00:15:08.300 what is the

00:15:08.700 NOAA?

00:15:10.700 The National

00:15:11.400 Organization,

00:15:12.380 National

00:15:12.860 Oceanic

00:15:13.740 A

00:15:16.440 is

00:15:17.140 Atmospheric

00:15:17.980 Association.

00:15:22.300 Oceanic

00:15:22.820 and Atmospheric

00:15:23.480 Administration.

00:15:25.860 Exactly.

00:15:26.700 That's exactly

00:15:27.300 what I said.

00:15:28.640 Right.

00:15:28.800 Or something

00:15:30.460 like that.

00:15:31.080 Anyway,

00:15:31.480 so that

00:15:31.860 organization

00:15:32.620 put out

00:15:33.200 their

00:15:33.560 data

00:15:35.100 and it

00:15:35.580 was

00:15:36.420 interpreted

00:15:37.120 two

00:15:37.460 different

00:15:37.720 ways.

00:15:38.900 Steve

00:15:39.220 Malloy

00:15:39.560 says,

00:15:41.020 according to

00:15:41.520 the official

00:15:42.000 government

00:15:42.440 numbers,

00:15:43.800 in the

00:15:44.420 last eight

00:15:44.960 years,

00:15:45.400 the trend

00:15:45.900 has been

00:15:46.400 a decrease

00:15:47.200 in temperature.

00:15:49.480 Which,

00:15:50.120 by the way,

00:15:50.660 I don't see

00:15:51.240 anybody

00:15:51.500 questioning

00:15:52.000 the data.

00:15:53.600 In other

00:15:54.020 words,

00:15:54.380 when Steve

00:15:55.560 Malloy

00:15:55.900 looks at

00:15:56.360 it and

00:15:56.520 says,

00:15:57.280 you just

00:15:57.940 told us

00:15:58.360 that the

00:15:58.760 temperature

00:15:59.100 went down

00:15:59.580 for the

00:15:59.860 last eight

00:16:00.240 years.

00:16:01.560 And then

00:16:01.860 he shows

00:16:02.220 the graph.

00:16:03.960 I don't

00:16:04.680 believe

00:16:04.960 anybody

00:16:05.280 was

00:16:05.640 questioning

00:16:06.380 whether

00:16:06.760 he

00:16:07.080 interpreted

00:16:07.480 it

00:16:07.760 correctly.

00:16:08.460 I think

00:16:09.020 it actually

00:16:09.480 went down.

00:16:10.960 But,

00:16:11.680 does that

00:16:12.300 mean anything?

00:16:13.600 Does that

00:16:14.120 tell you

00:16:14.440 that climate

00:16:14.980 change is

00:16:15.640 over?

00:16:17.140 No.

00:16:18.160 No.

00:16:18.680 Because if

00:16:19.100 you look

00:16:19.380 at the

00:16:19.620 longer-term

00:16:20.220 graph,

00:16:21.380 there are

00:16:21.740 lots of

00:16:22.340 multi-year

00:16:22.980 periods where

00:16:23.620 it does

00:16:23.900 go down.

00:16:25.000 Followed

00:16:25.480 by going

00:16:25.980 to a

00:16:26.260 new

00:16:26.400 high.

00:16:27.660 Followed

00:16:28.180 often by

00:16:28.800 down a

00:16:29.320 few

00:16:29.480 years.

00:16:30.700 Followed

00:16:31.020 by a

00:16:31.280 new

00:16:31.380 high.

00:16:32.220 Now,

00:16:32.580 I'm not

00:16:32.880 saying that

00:16:33.280 those numbers

00:16:33.740 are necessarily

00:16:34.340 correct,

00:16:35.360 because I

00:16:35.880 don't believe

00:16:36.260 anything anymore.

00:16:37.620 But,

00:16:38.820 those are

00:16:39.320 two completely

00:16:40.380 different stories

00:16:41.300 with the same

00:16:41.920 data.

00:16:43.340 If you

00:16:43.980 pick the

00:16:44.380 most recent

00:16:45.120 eight,

00:16:46.320 do you

00:16:46.680 have an

00:16:47.000 argument that

00:16:47.600 the most

00:16:47.920 recent eight

00:16:48.580 are more

00:16:48.980 important than

00:16:49.980 the last

00:16:50.400 ones?

00:16:51.180 A little

00:16:51.500 bit.

00:16:52.780 Don't we

00:16:53.260 all just

00:16:53.660 assume that

00:16:54.160 whatever's

00:16:54.580 happening

00:16:54.840 recently is

00:16:56.240 going to be

00:16:56.520 more important

00:16:57.080 than what

00:16:57.480 happened in

00:16:57.900 the past?

00:16:59.260 Like,

00:16:59.820 yeah,

00:17:00.060 your brain

00:17:00.440 just automatically

00:17:01.080 says,

00:17:01.480 well,

00:17:01.640 yeah,

00:17:02.460 it should be

00:17:02.940 more important

00:17:03.580 than it went

00:17:04.000 down the

00:17:04.480 last eight

00:17:04.900 years while

00:17:06.120 CO2 was

00:17:07.260 going up.

00:17:08.520 That should

00:17:09.080 mean something.

00:17:10.380 And then you

00:17:10.740 look at the

00:17:11.380 way that people

00:17:12.760 don't like that

00:17:13.480 story or that

00:17:14.560 narrative,

00:17:15.460 how they twist

00:17:16.280 and turn.

00:17:17.660 People actually

00:17:18.440 said,

00:17:19.580 this proves

00:17:20.340 that our

00:17:21.800 climate

00:17:22.660 strategies are

00:17:24.120 working.

00:17:26.580 What?

00:17:27.820 There are

00:17:28.260 actually people

00:17:28.860 who are

00:17:29.140 following climate

00:17:29.920 change and

00:17:31.200 commenting in

00:17:32.600 public, and

00:17:33.580 they believe

00:17:33.980 that we would

00:17:34.500 see the

00:17:34.960 change, you

00:17:36.220 know, because

00:17:36.500 we've done

00:17:36.920 enough that's

00:17:37.560 already lowering.

00:17:39.220 Okay, maybe.

00:17:40.740 I guess anything's

00:17:42.140 possible.

00:17:43.400 But I don't

00:17:43.960 think so.

00:17:45.000 I mean, it

00:17:45.280 seems pretty

00:17:45.780 unlikely to me.

00:17:46.600 But anyway,

00:17:49.060 Elon Musk

00:17:53.180 responded to

00:17:53.960 that one as

00:17:55.160 well.

00:17:56.700 And he

00:17:58.100 said, so he

00:17:59.900 responded to

00:18:01.040 my comments

00:18:01.820 about it that

00:18:02.600 two different

00:18:05.400 things were

00:18:05.860 being presented.

00:18:07.840 It's, we

00:18:09.240 also have the

00:18:10.260 eight years

00:18:11.580 were the

00:18:11.980 warmest on

00:18:12.620 record, but

00:18:14.020 also trending

00:18:14.760 down.

00:18:15.180 So which

00:18:16.160 one do you

00:18:16.560 care about?

00:18:17.600 That it's the

00:18:18.160 warmest on

00:18:18.760 record, or

00:18:20.040 that it's

00:18:20.400 trending down?

00:18:21.300 You tell me.

00:18:21.960 Which one

00:18:22.340 should I care

00:18:22.780 about?

00:18:23.960 Which one

00:18:24.660 matters?

00:18:25.140 It's the

00:18:25.500 warmest in

00:18:26.140 record, or

00:18:27.700 it's trending

00:18:28.180 down?

00:18:28.540 trend, I

00:18:32.820 see a lot of

00:18:33.460 neither's, or

00:18:36.220 neither's, trend

00:18:38.400 both.

00:18:39.600 All right, here's

00:18:40.060 the correct

00:18:40.740 answer.

00:18:42.160 There is one

00:18:43.120 correct answer,

00:18:45.140 and there's, and

00:18:46.420 I won't take any

00:18:47.140 debate on this.

00:18:48.960 All right?

00:18:50.260 If you don't

00:18:51.140 present both of

00:18:51.960 them, you're not a

00:18:52.880 credible person.

00:18:53.600 That's the

00:18:55.860 answer.

00:18:56.520 If you don't

00:18:57.280 present both at

00:18:59.120 the same time,

00:19:00.580 don't listen to

00:19:02.380 anything else they

00:19:03.100 say.

00:19:03.920 Now, I think I'm

00:19:04.580 going to give

00:19:04.940 Steve Malloy a

00:19:06.060 pass, because he's

00:19:08.280 talking about it in

00:19:08.980 the context of the

00:19:09.980 other data, right?

00:19:10.900 So that's fair,

00:19:12.160 because the other

00:19:12.720 data's already

00:19:13.280 presented, so he

00:19:14.560 presented the part

00:19:15.400 they left out.

00:19:16.300 So that's good,

00:19:17.440 because that

00:19:17.940 incorporates the

00:19:19.200 whole.

00:19:19.400 But if anybody

00:19:20.560 tells you one of

00:19:21.440 those numbers, and

00:19:22.920 they leave out the

00:19:23.620 other one, don't

00:19:25.160 listen to anything

00:19:25.720 they ever say

00:19:26.260 again.

00:19:27.120 That's somebody who

00:19:27.780 doesn't know how to

00:19:28.440 do anything.

00:19:31.740 And by the way, I

00:19:32.640 don't know if Steve

00:19:33.640 Malloy is credible or

00:19:34.960 not credible.

00:19:35.720 I have no opinion.

00:19:36.940 I just know that he

00:19:37.940 had an interesting

00:19:38.560 point about this

00:19:39.440 particular data.

00:19:42.100 And I looked at

00:19:43.680 my numbers, and I

00:19:47.180 had millions,

00:19:47.900 millions of

00:19:49.160 views on my

00:19:50.500 tweet, and I

00:19:52.020 thought, what the

00:19:53.140 hell is going on

00:19:53.700 here?

00:19:54.880 Oh, Elon Musk

00:19:56.140 responded to that

00:19:57.160 one, too, last

00:19:58.260 night.

00:19:58.920 And he said, it's

00:19:59.860 easier to argue

00:20:00.560 that global warming

00:20:01.320 is a risk rather

00:20:03.120 than a certainty,

00:20:04.340 but it is foolish

00:20:05.760 to roll those dice,

00:20:07.300 given that we will

00:20:08.120 eventually run

00:20:08.760 out of fossil fuels

00:20:09.640 and have to

00:20:10.660 generate energy

00:20:11.540 sustainable anyway.

00:20:13.300 How many of you

00:20:14.280 would say that's

00:20:15.980 the best view?

00:20:17.580 Does that

00:20:17.920 would you

00:20:19.760 concur?

00:20:20.980 That we don't

00:20:22.080 know what the

00:20:22.840 future looks like,

00:20:24.120 but we do know

00:20:25.460 we can't use

00:20:26.980 fossil fuels

00:20:27.800 forever.

00:20:30.640 Is that a

00:20:31.920 reasonable view?

00:20:33.420 Is anything

00:20:34.100 left out?

00:20:37.320 Anything left

00:20:38.200 out?

00:20:41.140 Yes.

00:20:42.700 Because what he's

00:20:43.700 saying, I believe,

00:20:44.580 would be 100%

00:20:46.020 compatible with

00:20:46.980 everybody's view,

00:20:48.060 wouldn't it?

00:20:49.120 Is there anybody

00:20:49.860 who doesn't think,

00:20:51.560 let me say it

00:20:52.280 without the

00:20:52.860 negatives,

00:20:54.180 do you all

00:20:55.040 understand that

00:20:57.180 there's no doubt

00:20:58.020 about it,

00:20:59.040 humanity will use

00:21:00.240 different sources

00:21:00.980 of energy in the

00:21:01.900 future?

00:21:03.080 Does anybody

00:21:03.860 doubt that?

00:21:05.800 We're all 100%

00:21:07.100 certain that at

00:21:09.320 some point in the

00:21:10.320 future, we'll

00:21:11.940 probably have other

00:21:12.740 sources.

00:21:13.140 might be fusion,

00:21:14.640 might be more

00:21:15.360 standard nuclear

00:21:18.140 stuff, might be

00:21:20.400 something else,

00:21:21.160 might be electric,

00:21:22.060 might be more

00:21:22.480 wind, who knows.

00:21:23.880 But we're all

00:21:25.480 sure of that,

00:21:26.080 right?

00:21:26.400 So I would say

00:21:26.980 that what Elon Musk

00:21:27.780 said is something we

00:21:28.580 would all agree with,

00:21:30.060 right?

00:21:31.160 Is there anybody

00:21:31.900 who would disagree

00:21:32.620 with the proposition

00:21:34.720 that we're going to

00:21:36.800 run out of the

00:21:37.460 stuff we use,

00:21:38.340 so it doesn't matter

00:21:39.540 if there's climate

00:21:40.140 change or not,

00:21:40.900 we have to get

00:21:42.020 ready to develop

00:21:43.540 new sources?

00:21:44.800 Everybody?

00:21:46.860 I'm seeing some

00:21:47.760 dissenters, I'll get 1.00

00:21:48.580 to you in a moment.

00:21:49.280 All right, the

00:21:50.080 dissenters, you

00:21:50.880 already know it's a

00:21:51.580 trick, right?

00:21:52.680 You know I'm

00:21:53.400 tricking you, you 0.96

00:21:54.840 know it.

00:21:56.300 Yeah.

00:21:56.880 Here's what's left

00:21:57.840 out.

00:21:58.520 Here's the dog not

00:21:59.360 barking.

00:22:00.700 It's not about where

00:22:01.980 things are going.

00:22:03.380 We all agree that

00:22:04.580 there's not infinite

00:22:06.180 oil.

00:22:07.520 There's nobody

00:22:08.080 arguing that there

00:22:08.880 is.

00:22:09.140 The only thing

00:22:10.760 we disagree on

00:22:11.500 is the rate of

00:22:12.180 change, and he

00:22:14.140 didn't mention

00:22:14.580 that.

00:22:15.620 The rate of

00:22:16.320 change is the

00:22:16.900 only topic we

00:22:18.100 disagree on.

00:22:19.420 How aggressively,

00:22:21.340 how much of our

00:22:22.740 taxes do you put

00:22:24.500 into it because

00:22:25.180 you're trying to

00:22:25.660 make it happen

00:22:26.160 fast versus 0.95

00:22:27.700 letting the free

00:22:28.760 market do whatever

00:22:29.980 it wants, right?

00:22:31.520 So the question

00:22:32.440 was never about

00:22:34.060 whether we need

00:22:35.280 new sustainable

00:22:36.080 energy.

00:22:36.800 Everybody knew

00:22:37.420 that.

00:22:39.140 Everybody knew

00:22:39.960 we needed new

00:22:40.600 ones eventually,

00:22:41.500 whether it's 100

00:22:42.100 years from now

00:22:42.680 or 200 years

00:22:43.340 from now.

00:22:44.140 You still have

00:22:44.780 to do it.

00:22:46.060 But if you

00:22:47.360 have to do it

00:22:48.040 in 20 years,

00:22:49.900 that is an

00:22:50.600 entirely different

00:22:51.340 proposition than

00:22:52.200 you have to do

00:22:52.780 it in 300 years.

00:22:54.500 You can't compare

00:22:55.500 those two.

00:22:56.280 And to imagine

00:22:56.880 that you can

00:23:00.320 leave that out

00:23:01.120 looks a little

00:23:03.160 bit more,

00:23:04.080 a little bit

00:23:05.920 more, let's

00:23:06.880 say, persuasion

00:23:08.300 related than

00:23:09.420 data related.

00:23:12.420 Because Elon

00:23:13.220 Musk has a

00:23:14.960 business that is

00:23:16.340 very much in the

00:23:17.100 business of

00:23:17.720 alternative energy.

00:23:19.500 So of course

00:23:19.940 he would like to

00:23:22.020 do that maybe

00:23:22.880 faster than the

00:23:24.200 rest of us,

00:23:25.080 maybe, or

00:23:25.920 faster than some

00:23:26.760 of us and

00:23:27.580 slower than some

00:23:28.420 people would like

00:23:29.260 it as well.

00:23:29.660 But he does

00:23:30.660 have an

00:23:31.460 enormous

00:23:32.860 financial interest

00:23:34.740 in being a

00:23:36.040 little bit quick

00:23:36.720 about it.

00:23:37.860 Because that's

00:23:38.240 where his money

00:23:38.800 is, is being

00:23:39.400 quick about it.

00:23:40.140 Buy a Tesla

00:23:40.600 now, save the

00:23:41.880 world.

00:23:43.300 But he's not

00:23:43.940 wrong.

00:23:45.260 He's not wrong. 0.53

00:23:45.940 You just have to

00:23:46.540 consider that the

00:23:47.440 rate is the real

00:23:48.040 question.

00:23:48.760 Do you upend

00:23:49.400 everything quickly

00:23:50.220 or let it play

00:23:51.480 out?

00:23:51.760 That's really the

00:23:52.380 decision.

00:23:54.720 Well, this was

00:23:55.580 going to happen.

00:23:57.820 You know how

00:23:58.660 the Republicans

00:23:59.980 or just people

00:24:01.840 who lean right

00:24:02.680 like to say

00:24:04.040 that the

00:24:04.400 Democrats are

00:24:05.080 all groomers?

00:24:06.580 I'm sure you

00:24:07.320 have not missed

00:24:07.820 that story.

00:24:08.780 I try not to

00:24:09.940 talk about it

00:24:10.600 because it's

00:24:11.020 just achy.

00:24:11.740 It's not really

00:24:12.300 a topic.

00:24:14.220 I don't know.

00:24:14.540 It's just not

00:24:15.000 worthy of talking

00:24:15.960 about most of

00:24:16.480 the time.

00:24:17.360 But the

00:24:19.000 Democrats put

00:24:19.840 together a

00:24:20.360 compilation video

00:24:21.920 of GOP

00:24:23.340 groomers.

00:24:24.140 and it's a

00:24:26.740 pretty long

00:24:27.280 compilation video.

00:24:29.160 Now, of course,

00:24:29.980 they include

00:24:30.840 historical examples

00:24:32.120 so they can go

00:24:32.840 back a little bit.

00:24:34.220 But if you go

00:24:35.200 back a little bit,

00:24:36.120 you find a whole

00:24:36.800 bunch of people

00:24:37.460 who are

00:24:38.040 Republicans who

00:24:39.840 absolutely

00:24:40.640 were in that

00:24:42.640 groomer category,

00:24:43.800 if you will.

00:24:45.420 So,

00:24:46.460 do you know

00:24:48.280 offhand

00:24:49.040 who does

00:24:51.020 more of it?

00:24:51.680 Now, most

00:24:54.560 of the GOP

00:24:55.280 examples were

00:24:56.160 individuals who

00:24:58.200 did things and

00:24:58.940 got caught.

00:25:00.540 And they

00:25:01.020 seemed like

00:25:01.380 individual acts.

00:25:02.560 Whereas the

00:25:03.320 so-called

00:25:03.980 grooming that

00:25:05.040 is, you know,

00:25:06.080 the alleged

00:25:06.680 grooming, I'll

00:25:07.300 call it, on

00:25:08.380 the left is

00:25:09.540 industrial level.

00:25:11.700 Right?

00:25:12.640 It's not that

00:25:13.480 people on the

00:25:14.200 right are saying,

00:25:15.220 hey, there's

00:25:15.720 that one groomer 0.94

00:25:16.520 over there.

00:25:17.740 Like, sometimes

00:25:18.400 they talk about

00:25:18.980 Epstein or

00:25:19.480 something.

00:25:20.400 But mostly,

00:25:21.680 it's about

00:25:22.260 if you've

00:25:23.120 got a teacher

00:25:23.860 or somebody

00:25:25.680 who has power,

00:25:27.020 yeah, it's like

00:25:27.480 systemic grooming.

00:25:28.740 That's the

00:25:29.140 complaint.

00:25:29.660 So they're not

00:25:30.160 really comparable.

00:25:31.780 But if you

00:25:33.460 imagine that all

00:25:34.280 the groomers are

00:25:35.040 on one political

00:25:35.820 side, well,

00:25:38.600 maybe it will

00:25:39.260 change your mind

00:25:40.160 on that.

00:25:41.200 I don't think

00:25:41.880 anybody thought

00:25:42.380 that, but it's

00:25:43.500 a pretty good

00:25:43.900 play.

00:25:44.580 So just in

00:25:45.260 terms of

00:25:45.640 persuasion, I

00:25:47.220 thought the

00:25:47.580 Dems did a

00:25:48.240 good job.

00:25:48.700 it's completely

00:25:50.560 let's say

00:25:52.940 manipulative

00:25:53.680 and propaganda

00:25:55.000 and is not

00:25:56.300 based on

00:25:56.860 proper context

00:25:58.020 and all that.

00:25:59.040 So it's not

00:25:59.780 good, but

00:26:02.140 it is a

00:26:03.200 well-executed

00:26:04.140 persuasion.

00:26:05.900 It's a pretty

00:26:06.320 good Me Too

00:26:06.880 play.

00:26:07.440 Not Me Too,

00:26:08.640 what do you

00:26:08.960 call it?

00:26:09.920 You Too?

00:26:10.700 More of a

00:26:11.280 you too than

00:26:11.820 a me too.

00:26:12.360 One of my

00:26:17.820 guilty pleasures

00:26:18.640 lately is

00:26:19.340 watching

00:26:19.800 Jonathan Turley

00:26:21.420 dunking on

00:26:22.980 Adam Schiff.

00:26:24.300 If you haven't

00:26:25.020 caught any of

00:26:26.020 Jonathan Turley's

00:26:26.880 articles or

00:26:27.740 tweet threads

00:26:28.520 about Adam

00:26:30.020 Schiff, the

00:26:30.840 most storied

00:26:32.540 liar of our

00:26:34.180 day, it's

00:26:35.780 really good

00:26:36.240 stuff.

00:26:37.300 Like, just to

00:26:37.900 watch how

00:26:38.580 capably he

00:26:42.060 lays out the

00:26:43.160 case.

00:26:44.160 Turley's great.

00:26:45.320 Like, I can't

00:26:46.500 get enough of

00:26:47.120 anything he

00:26:47.640 writes.

00:26:48.360 I see a

00:26:48.880 tweet from

00:26:49.280 his, and

00:26:50.040 I'm definitely

00:26:50.840 going to read

00:26:51.200 that.

00:26:52.540 He does good

00:26:53.080 stuff.

00:26:55.700 So he points

00:26:56.620 out that the

00:26:58.380 Schiff was

00:26:59.200 publicly,

00:27:01.820 his office was

00:27:03.460 demanding all

00:27:04.140 kinds of

00:27:04.580 censorship.

00:27:06.000 At the same

00:27:06.720 time he was

00:27:07.260 lying about

00:27:07.800 stuff in

00:27:08.240 public.

00:27:08.580 So he was

00:27:10.100 lying in

00:27:10.800 public while

00:27:12.620 trying really

00:27:13.400 hard to get

00:27:14.460 the, at

00:27:15.580 least Twitter,

00:27:17.260 to suppress

00:27:19.100 his critics.

00:27:20.220 While he was

00:27:21.160 lying in

00:27:21.900 public, he

00:27:23.600 was moving

00:27:24.460 really hard,

00:27:25.300 not just like

00:27:25.880 one phone call

00:27:26.700 or something,

00:27:27.200 but a whole

00:27:28.020 program of

00:27:29.360 trying to

00:27:29.780 suppress the

00:27:30.380 people who

00:27:30.760 were calling

00:27:31.280 him out for

00:27:32.480 lying in

00:27:32.960 public.

00:27:36.080 Jenny.

00:27:38.580 stop it,

00:27:39.220 Jenny.

00:27:43.240 It's amazing.

00:27:44.960 It's just

00:27:45.400 amazing.

00:27:47.260 Yeah.

00:27:48.860 Like, to

00:27:49.460 watch Schiff

00:27:50.280 operate.

00:27:51.100 I think

00:27:51.700 Schiff is,

00:27:53.040 he is turned

00:27:53.780 into a national

00:27:54.540 asset accidentally.

00:27:56.740 Like, I think he

00:27:57.280 was just the

00:27:57.700 worst person.

00:27:58.540 Like, character

00:27:59.940 wise, I've never

00:28:00.680 seen anybody lower

00:28:01.360 character than

00:28:02.160 Adam Schiff.

00:28:03.440 But, because

00:28:04.840 he's now so

00:28:05.640 well-known as

00:28:06.420 the signal of

00:28:07.220 lying, that

00:28:08.740 whenever he gets

00:28:10.400 pushed forward

00:28:11.160 to lie for the

00:28:12.540 Democrats, you

00:28:13.660 can say to

00:28:14.080 yourself, oh,

00:28:15.480 they sent the

00:28:16.080 liar.

00:28:17.680 And whenever

00:28:18.160 there's a scandal

00:28:18.940 that's not really

00:28:19.800 anything, who

00:28:22.060 did they send?

00:28:23.160 Bernstein, to

00:28:24.620 say it's worse

00:28:25.120 than Watergate.

00:28:26.160 Right?

00:28:26.500 So if you see

00:28:27.300 Bernstein, or you

00:28:29.120 see Adam Schiff,

00:28:30.980 or you see Eric

00:28:32.000 Swalwell, the

00:28:33.780 one thing you

00:28:34.380 can know is

00:28:35.640 that honest

00:28:37.120 Democrats aren't

00:28:38.140 willing to say

00:28:38.760 those things.

00:28:40.560 Or Brennan,

00:28:41.540 right?

00:28:41.820 Brennan and

00:28:42.260 Clapper, too.

00:28:43.360 Right.

00:28:43.760 And I mean that

00:28:44.360 literally, because

00:28:45.980 there are a lot

00:28:47.100 of honest

00:28:47.660 Democrats.

00:28:49.520 Lots of

00:28:50.180 them.

00:28:51.100 The honest

00:28:51.700 ones won't go

00:28:52.360 anywhere near a

00:28:53.140 camera when

00:28:54.640 their team is

00:28:55.600 presenting a lie.

00:28:56.680 So they send

00:28:57.140 Schiff, and

00:28:57.820 you know, they're

00:28:59.080 designated liars.

00:29:00.260 So it's actually

00:29:00.880 useful now,

00:29:02.000 to know when

00:29:02.500 they're lying

00:29:03.000 because they

00:29:03.460 just tell you.

00:29:04.620 Oh, by the

00:29:05.160 way, this is

00:29:05.600 just lying.

00:29:06.880 Now, I'm

00:29:07.560 going to

00:29:07.740 disagree with

00:29:08.300 you on

00:29:08.560 Ted Lieu.

00:29:10.620 I'm more of

00:29:11.340 a Ted Lieu

00:29:12.000 fan than

00:29:13.080 you're going

00:29:13.740 to suspect.

00:29:15.040 Right?

00:29:15.280 So he and I

00:29:16.040 have had some

00:29:16.600 exchanges on

00:29:17.940 Twitter as

00:29:18.420 well.

00:29:19.420 But he's

00:29:21.280 just a

00:29:22.000 partisan.

00:29:23.440 He's just a

00:29:23.960 partisan.

00:29:25.280 He's not,

00:29:26.800 like, he's just

00:29:27.380 pushing his side,

00:29:28.380 and, you know,

00:29:28.820 he's doing it in

00:29:29.420 public.

00:29:30.680 Is he right?

00:29:31.800 No.

00:29:33.020 But is the

00:29:33.620 other team right

00:29:34.280 all the time?

00:29:35.020 No.

00:29:36.460 I just don't see

00:29:37.500 him anywhere near

00:29:38.760 the Schiff and

00:29:41.360 Swalwell level.

00:29:42.620 He just seems

00:29:43.180 like a

00:29:43.480 partisan.

00:29:46.460 Gates was on

00:29:47.300 Timcast last

00:29:48.080 night.

00:29:48.540 Somebody says

00:29:49.020 that was fire.

00:29:50.840 Yeah.

00:29:51.080 I like Ted

00:29:51.580 Lieu.

00:29:52.120 I don't know.

00:29:52.600 I feel like I

00:29:53.220 could hang with

00:29:53.760 him.

00:29:54.340 He just seems

00:29:54.760 like he'd be a

00:29:55.280 fun guy.

00:29:55.660 I tend to

00:29:58.000 like anybody

00:29:58.420 who's got a

00:29:58.800 sense of

00:29:59.180 humor.

00:30:01.460 Just sort of,

00:30:02.820 you know, a

00:30:03.280 general statement.

00:30:05.920 All right.

00:30:06.420 Carrie Lake

00:30:07.240 is still, I

00:30:09.380 guess she had

00:30:09.780 some court

00:30:11.080 success in

00:30:12.080 pressing her

00:30:13.440 case, so

00:30:14.080 basically she

00:30:14.960 just gets the

00:30:16.240 chance to

00:30:16.720 press her 0.89

00:30:17.180 case.

00:30:18.360 And two

00:30:19.280 of the things

00:30:19.740 that she's

00:30:20.140 claiming about

00:30:20.800 the Arizona

00:30:21.560 election that

00:30:22.840 she thinks

00:30:23.300 were illegitimate

00:30:24.720 are that 300,000

00:30:26.300 or more

00:30:26.900 ballots did

00:30:28.180 not have a

00:30:28.800 proper chain

00:30:29.400 of custody.

00:30:31.280 And number

00:30:31.880 two, over

00:30:33.000 100,000 ballots

00:30:33.960 with faulty

00:30:34.520 signature

00:30:35.040 verification got

00:30:38.080 through.

00:30:38.920 So the

00:30:39.480 Arizona law

00:30:40.200 says that

00:30:40.780 they must be

00:30:41.760 verified, but

00:30:43.200 her claim is

00:30:43.980 that over

00:30:45.040 100,000 were

00:30:45.820 not.

00:30:46.740 Now, here's

00:30:47.680 my problem.

00:30:48.260 here's my

00:30:54.580 problem.

00:30:57.640 How would a

00:30:58.680 court ever

00:30:59.240 act on that?

00:31:00.240 I don't even

00:31:00.700 see how a

00:31:01.240 court would do

00:31:01.720 anything.

00:31:02.420 Because isn't

00:31:03.380 the court going

00:31:03.920 to say, yeah,

00:31:05.520 yep, good

00:31:06.480 points.

00:31:07.600 Arizona didn't 0.62

00:31:08.540 do a good job

00:31:09.380 of following

00:31:09.880 their own

00:31:10.280 procedures.

00:31:13.040 Thanks for

00:31:13.660 telling me.

00:31:14.080 I think the

00:31:17.760 Constitution just

00:31:18.660 says it's up to

00:31:19.340 the states.

00:31:20.340 I don't believe

00:31:21.300 the Constitution

00:31:21.880 says the states

00:31:22.880 must operate

00:31:23.580 perfectly, according

00:31:25.300 to you, or it

00:31:26.900 doesn't count.

00:31:28.540 Now, it would be

00:31:29.240 different if there

00:31:30.080 were direct

00:31:30.960 evidence of a

00:31:31.680 crime.

00:31:32.760 But if the only

00:31:33.780 problem is that

00:31:35.000 there was the

00:31:35.960 potential for

00:31:36.740 rigging, not

00:31:38.240 direct evidence,

00:31:39.160 but just potential

00:31:40.020 for rigging, what

00:31:41.680 does the court do

00:31:42.300 about that?

00:31:42.840 doesn't the

00:31:46.280 court just say, 1.00

00:31:47.540 well, you

00:31:48.580 know, get a

00:31:49.220 better state.

00:31:50.340 It's up to the

00:31:51.020 state.

00:31:51.540 If the state

00:31:53.620 did not give

00:31:54.740 you the

00:31:55.200 transparency you

00:31:56.260 wanted, maybe

00:31:58.320 you should talk

00:31:58.960 to the state.

00:32:01.600 Orders of

00:32:02.260 full audit?

00:32:03.600 I don't know.

00:32:04.480 I can't see

00:32:05.580 them decertifying

00:32:06.600 a governor race

00:32:08.860 at this point.

00:32:10.580 So, yeah,

00:32:10.980 here's the

00:32:11.640 thing.

00:32:11.840 If you're

00:32:13.220 making a

00:32:14.200 strict technical

00:32:15.440 argument, then

00:32:17.220 maybe you can

00:32:17.780 make a case that

00:32:18.580 the court could

00:32:19.320 do something on

00:32:20.080 a strictly

00:32:20.620 technical argument.

00:32:22.460 But I don't

00:32:23.080 think the courts

00:32:23.620 act that way when

00:32:24.600 it comes to

00:32:25.060 elections.

00:32:26.000 I think the

00:32:26.700 courts will

00:32:27.240 always favor

00:32:28.400 stability of

00:32:30.300 the system.

00:32:32.360 And so the

00:32:32.920 court, knowing

00:32:33.760 that if they

00:32:34.400 act, let's say

00:32:35.280 overthrowing

00:32:35.860 election, it

00:32:36.880 would create

00:32:37.920 instability in the

00:32:39.220 system, I don't

00:32:40.300 think they'll

00:32:40.660 act.

00:32:41.920 I think the

00:32:42.660 court is going

00:32:43.280 to say, yeah,

00:32:44.220 that looks pretty

00:32:44.840 sketchy, but you

00:32:46.520 work it out.

00:32:47.440 It's better if you

00:32:48.160 work it out than we

00:32:48.980 work it out.

00:32:49.780 I think that's

00:32:50.280 where it's going.

00:32:51.360 Now, that doesn't

00:32:52.240 mean she shouldn't

00:32:52.900 press the case.

00:32:54.600 Because I love the

00:32:55.700 fact that she's 0.98

00:32:56.540 highlighting, you

00:32:58.120 know, two

00:32:58.640 vulnerabilities in

00:32:59.600 her system that

00:33:00.220 probably are common

00:33:01.100 to other states,

00:33:02.620 and maybe everybody

00:33:03.580 should be looking

00:33:04.100 into it.

00:33:04.520 So it's a good,

00:33:06.500 solid, you know,

00:33:08.500 patriotic thing, and

00:33:11.000 I think we should

00:33:11.660 all be, even if

00:33:13.340 you disagree with,

00:33:14.860 you know, her

00:33:15.320 case, you should

00:33:16.880 all be happy she's

00:33:17.700 fighting it.

00:33:18.940 This is exactly the

00:33:20.140 kind of fight that

00:33:21.560 you want to maybe

00:33:23.200 get some more

00:33:23.680 transparency in your

00:33:24.560 system, make people

00:33:25.860 a little bit more

00:33:26.460 alert where the

00:33:27.320 problems are.

00:33:28.400 It's all good.

00:33:29.460 No matter how this

00:33:30.260 ends, Carrie Lake

00:33:31.280 is fighting a good

00:33:32.480 fight.

00:33:32.780 So I think we're

00:33:33.420 going to come out

00:33:33.880 ahead one way or

00:33:35.160 another.

00:33:35.520 I don't think

00:33:35.920 she's going to

00:33:36.380 win, but I think

00:33:37.540 we'll come out

00:33:38.580 ahead.

00:33:41.260 Did you see the

00:33:42.220 new, is it the

00:33:46.160 CDC who's saying

00:33:47.040 it, that the new

00:33:48.140 variant of the

00:33:48.900 virus is more

00:33:50.320 likely to hit the

00:33:51.880 vaccinated and

00:33:53.120 already infected?

00:33:55.400 Do you believe

00:33:56.160 that?

00:33:58.520 It's the and

00:33:59.840 already infected.

00:34:01.380 Do you believe

00:34:02.020 that there's a

00:34:02.600 variant that is

00:34:04.160 more likely to

00:34:05.360 infect you if

00:34:07.100 you'd already

00:34:07.840 been infected

00:34:08.560 with a variant

00:34:09.840 of that variant?

00:34:12.240 Is that, is that

00:34:13.960 passing your

00:34:14.620 sniff test?

00:34:16.600 Now, the problem

00:34:18.200 is that I don't

00:34:18.880 see a mechanism,

00:34:20.280 right?

00:34:20.500 There's no

00:34:20.940 proposed mechanism

00:34:21.880 for why that could

00:34:22.640 be the case.

00:34:23.600 But with the

00:34:24.460 vaccinations, there

00:34:27.440 are smart people

00:34:28.360 who propose a

00:34:29.940 potential mechanism,

00:34:31.480 mechanism by which

00:34:32.940 they could cause

00:34:33.580 harm to some

00:34:34.200 people.

00:34:35.040 That's a well

00:34:36.040 described mechanism.

00:34:37.480 But having a

00:34:38.880 prior infection,

00:34:40.720 everything we know

00:34:42.100 about that says

00:34:42.820 that should make you

00:34:43.520 stronger against

00:34:45.000 anything related to

00:34:46.180 it, or at least

00:34:47.520 the same, under no

00:34:49.840 case have we ever

00:34:50.800 seen, correct me if

00:34:52.060 I'm wrong, but does

00:34:53.660 it make sense you'd

00:34:54.360 ever be weaker?

00:34:55.920 Weaker in that

00:34:56.700 specific way?

00:34:58.740 I don't know.

00:35:00.180 Well, let me ask

00:35:01.860 you this.

00:35:04.180 I sometimes go

00:35:06.360 entire days without

00:35:07.940 human contact.

00:35:09.820 Like, actually none.

00:35:11.980 Yeah, like one day

00:35:12.700 this week I talked to

00:35:13.800 no people in person.

00:35:15.680 Except I guess I

00:35:16.720 ordered something at

00:35:17.540 Starbucks.

00:35:18.600 That was as close as

00:35:19.740 I got to human

00:35:20.340 contact.

00:35:20.700 Now, would a

00:35:23.860 person like me, who

00:35:25.820 can, I can socially

00:35:28.020 isolate better than

00:35:29.200 almost anybody, would

00:35:30.900 a person like me be

00:35:31.800 inclined to get, like,

00:35:33.220 booster after booster?

00:35:35.200 Less likely.

00:35:36.380 Now, there are other

00:35:37.200 reasons, right?

00:35:38.040 That's not the only

00:35:38.640 reason, but much less

00:35:39.780 likely.

00:35:40.560 Now, suppose I had a

00:35:41.640 job where I was going

00:35:43.320 to be around people,

00:35:44.480 like, hordes of people

00:35:45.980 all the time.

00:35:47.740 Would I be more likely

00:35:49.240 to have been boosted?

00:35:50.900 Now, again, at my

00:35:51.720 age, right?

00:35:52.320 We're not talking

00:35:52.860 about younger people.

00:35:53.740 That's a whole

00:35:54.060 different calculation.

00:35:55.400 But at my age, would

00:35:57.240 I be more likely to

00:35:58.420 be boosted if I knew

00:35:59.500 I was just going to

00:35:59.960 be surrounded by

00:36:00.980 possibly infected

00:36:02.500 people all the time?

00:36:03.720 I think so.

00:36:04.960 I think so.

00:36:05.880 I think that I would

00:36:07.040 be more likely to

00:36:07.900 boost because I would

00:36:09.380 talk myself into that

00:36:10.560 being a danger.

00:36:12.360 So, how do we

00:36:13.660 know that the

00:36:15.560 people who have the

00:36:16.540 most obvious chance

00:36:18.580 of getting infected

00:36:19.440 aren't the ones

00:36:20.760 who quite reasonably

00:36:21.660 are more likely to

00:36:22.720 be vaccinated and

00:36:23.600 boosted?

00:36:25.200 Wouldn't you expect

00:36:27.040 that the more

00:36:28.600 boosted you are,

00:36:29.400 the more likely

00:36:29.920 you would get

00:36:30.320 infected?

00:36:31.620 That's what I'd

00:36:32.380 expect.

00:36:35.260 But I'm not sure

00:36:36.520 that that works

00:36:37.400 for natural immunity.

00:36:39.240 Does it feel to you

00:36:40.540 like they might have

00:36:41.320 thrown in the natural

00:36:42.320 immunity part so you

00:36:44.260 wouldn't suspect it's

00:36:45.180 the vaccinations?

00:36:45.860 Doesn't it feel like

00:36:48.500 that's what they did?

00:36:49.920 It's like, really?

00:36:51.360 Because one of them

00:36:52.040 has a described

00:36:53.000 mechanism and the

00:36:55.580 other one's never

00:36:56.300 happened.

00:36:59.720 It feels like a

00:37:00.780 little sketchy that

00:37:01.820 they put them in the

00:37:02.580 same sentence.

00:37:03.680 You know, if you

00:37:05.360 got vaccinated or

00:37:07.300 natural immunity,

00:37:09.400 I'm not buying any of

00:37:11.600 that.

00:37:11.800 Now, to his credit,

00:37:14.740 do you know what

00:37:15.180 Fauci said about it?

00:37:17.140 Fauci said the data

00:37:18.120 might be bullshit.

00:37:20.860 Okay.

00:37:21.900 I'm going to give him

00:37:22.820 that.

00:37:24.220 I'm going to give him

00:37:25.440 that.

00:37:26.220 He actually said the

00:37:27.040 data might be wrong.

00:37:28.060 Because apparently it's

00:37:29.040 something that our

00:37:30.720 data is showing, but

00:37:31.700 other countries are not

00:37:32.700 buying into this

00:37:33.440 analysis.

00:37:35.320 Right?

00:37:35.880 So there's something

00:37:36.740 sketchy about the

00:37:37.600 whole thing.

00:37:38.680 Either the data is

00:37:39.540 wrong, or if the data

00:37:40.940 is right, they're

00:37:41.720 lying to us, maybe by

00:37:43.620 throwing in the

00:37:44.240 natural immunity

00:37:44.900 people.

00:37:45.760 I mean, to me, this

00:37:46.460 screams bad data, or

00:37:48.020 bad analysis.

00:37:49.520 I don't know.

00:37:50.720 I mean, we could be

00:37:51.720 wrong.

00:37:53.380 I'll put everything in

00:37:54.260 a statistical frame,

00:37:57.320 not a yes or no.

00:37:59.500 But certainly sketchy

00:38:00.760 looking.

00:38:05.560 All right.

00:38:06.500 Here's where I want

00:38:07.800 to get the clot

00:38:09.160 Burtz all clicking

00:38:11.260 away.

00:38:12.000 Click, click, click,

00:38:12.560 click, click, click.

00:38:13.440 Clop Burtz.

00:38:15.460 I'm going to say

00:38:16.220 something that will

00:38:17.260 make you mistakenly

00:38:18.700 believe that I have a

00:38:20.740 different opinion than

00:38:21.540 I do.

00:38:22.480 Now, the rest of you

00:38:23.340 will completely be on

00:38:24.760 board, and it'll be

00:38:25.500 easy to understand.

00:38:26.640 But the clot Burtz are 1.00

00:38:27.820 just binary.

00:38:28.640 It's like, loves this,

00:38:29.900 hates this.

00:38:30.820 Wait, wait, wait.

00:38:31.360 You said something

00:38:31.900 about this?

00:38:32.300 You must hate it.

00:38:33.440 All right.

00:38:34.360 So the rest of you

00:38:35.360 will be fine.

00:38:35.900 It goes like this.

00:38:39.620 I'm going to give you

00:38:40.220 a little wind-up here.

00:38:42.840 There's one thing that

00:38:43.980 artists add to the

00:38:46.120 system that sometimes

00:38:47.800 scientists and engineers

00:38:49.260 and lawyers will miss.

00:38:51.700 What is it?

00:38:53.100 What is it that artists

00:38:54.400 will sometimes see that

00:38:57.060 engineers and scientists

00:38:58.600 and other people don't

00:39:01.280 see?

00:39:02.820 Now, not feelings.

00:39:05.180 Maybe that's true,

00:39:06.220 but that's not where

00:39:06.760 I'm going.

00:39:07.460 I'm not going for the

00:39:08.260 feelings part.

00:39:11.360 I just want to, not

00:39:12.660 nuance.

00:39:14.100 No, there's something

00:39:15.000 really big that artists

00:39:17.500 see that other people

00:39:19.060 don't even look for.

00:39:20.580 In other words, we're

00:39:21.380 actually actively looking

00:39:22.660 for something that

00:39:24.220 nobody else looks for.

00:39:26.580 Ooh.

00:39:27.560 A little connection

00:39:28.360 problem there.

00:39:30.120 All right.

00:39:30.520 Here's the answer.

00:39:31.280 Empty space.

00:39:35.440 Empty space.

00:39:37.300 If I'm going to design,

00:39:39.860 let's say, a graphic art,

00:39:42.020 if I'm going to design

00:39:45.200 something, I will look

00:39:47.040 for where I put stuff

00:39:48.200 in the picture, but I'll

00:39:49.640 make sure that there's a

00:39:50.540 big empty space, a

00:39:52.240 negative space, because

00:39:53.600 that's what makes the

00:39:54.620 composition work.

00:39:56.300 It's the, not just

00:39:57.360 where you put stuff,

00:39:58.900 it's where you decide to

00:39:59.880 not put stuff.

00:40:01.280 So I actively look for

00:40:03.420 the missing parts.

00:40:05.120 I often talk about the

00:40:06.180 dog not barking.

00:40:08.300 I believe I've just

00:40:09.600 trained my brain to look

00:40:10.860 for the part that's

00:40:11.640 missing, because humor

00:40:13.060 does that too.

00:40:14.100 If I'm looking at a

00:40:15.060 situation and I want to

00:40:16.260 find the joke, I don't

00:40:18.320 say what's there, I say

00:40:20.560 what's missing, as well

00:40:22.240 as what's there.

00:40:22.800 So I'm always actively

00:40:24.600 looking for what's

00:40:25.480 missing.

00:40:26.620 Now, we have this big

00:40:28.420 conversation about

00:40:29.180 excess mortality.

00:40:30.920 Some say it might be

00:40:32.680 COVID.

00:40:33.780 Some say it might be the

00:40:36.280 vaccination.

00:40:38.080 What does the artist say?

00:40:39.140 What if there's a third

00:40:45.880 mass killer and it's

00:40:48.460 invisible to us because

00:40:50.700 we're focused on the

00:40:51.900 other two things, the

00:40:53.100 COVID and the vax?

00:40:54.900 Now, of course, we think

00:40:56.700 there's some disruption

00:40:57.920 from the shutdowns

00:40:59.660 themselves.

00:41:00.640 You know, there's some

00:41:01.140 delayed medical things and

00:41:02.440 everything.

00:41:03.420 But do all of those

00:41:05.880 explanations feel like

00:41:07.120 they're capturing the

00:41:08.580 amount of death that we

00:41:09.740 might be experiencing?

00:41:11.680 Does it feel like there

00:41:12.740 might be something else?

00:41:15.020 And if there were, if it

00:41:17.180 were fentanyl, we'd

00:41:17.940 probably have noticed it

00:41:18.760 by now.

00:41:19.500 So that is something

00:41:20.520 else.

00:41:21.080 But I'm going to give

00:41:23.380 you a hypothesis that I

00:41:25.640 don't present as, you

00:41:27.720 know, like a conclusion.

00:41:28.920 So I'm not going to say

00:41:29.620 this is for sure.

00:41:31.080 I'm going to give you

00:41:32.040 a hypothesis that

00:41:34.740 there's something really

00:41:35.740 big and really obvious

00:41:37.700 that's killing people,

00:41:39.620 maybe not instead of

00:41:41.540 vaccinations or COVID,

00:41:44.360 but on top of, on top

00:41:46.780 of.

00:41:47.400 So here's where the

00:41:48.700 cloppers will get

00:41:49.540 confused.

00:41:51.080 It's a fact that

00:41:53.000 vaccinations kill some

00:41:54.360 people.

00:41:55.680 We just don't know what

00:41:56.820 the percentage is.

00:41:58.020 Like, even the people who

00:41:58.980 are the most pro-vaccination 0.99

00:42:01.180 understand that we're all

00:42:03.360 built differently and some

00:42:04.440 people are going to die.

00:42:05.720 It's like true of a lot of

00:42:06.640 medications.

00:42:07.960 So there's not a question

00:42:09.440 about whether the

00:42:10.340 vaccinations are adding to

00:42:12.460 excess mortality or, you

00:42:15.140 know, that as well as the

00:42:16.660 COVID itself.

00:42:18.100 But what if, what if there

00:42:20.600 were a third mass killer?

00:42:23.400 Would you know it?

00:42:25.500 Let me ask you the first

00:42:26.640 question.

00:42:26.940 If, if there were something

00:42:28.580 else going on, would you

00:42:30.260 buy the, the, the first

00:42:32.500 assertion that we wouldn't

00:42:36.420 notice?

00:42:37.280 We wouldn't notice, right?

00:42:40.540 Now, here's my question.

00:42:42.240 What else changed at about

00:42:44.420 the same time as the

00:42:45.600 vaccinations were rolled

00:42:46.680 down?

00:42:47.480 If it's the only thing that

00:42:48.700 really changed, then I think,

00:42:51.380 you know, then it probably

00:42:53.340 makes perfect sense to focus

00:42:54.880 on it.

00:42:55.300 If it's the only thing that

00:42:56.280 changed.

00:42:57.400 But is it?

00:42:58.640 Is it the only thing that

00:42:59.720 changed?

00:43:01.440 I don't know.

00:43:03.140 Did you know that stress can

00:43:06.440 cause cardiac arrest?

00:43:10.720 Did you all know that an

00:43:12.080 increase in stress kills you?

00:43:15.480 I mean, not every person, but

00:43:16.800 statistically.

00:43:17.980 All right.

00:43:20.020 Let me take you back to 1970.

00:43:23.240 You're going to love where this

00:43:24.220 is going.

00:43:25.880 1970.

00:43:28.720 I was alive then.

00:43:30.940 You know, a young person.

00:43:32.440 Let's say I had a stressful day.

00:43:35.560 Oh, a bunch of stress.

00:43:37.360 And then I wanted to recover

00:43:39.300 from the stress.

00:43:40.520 What did I do to recover from

00:43:42.180 the stress?

00:43:43.680 Well, I'd usually just sit around

00:43:45.300 bored or I'd like pick the

00:43:48.360 bark off a stick or I'd sit on

00:43:50.900 a wall and wait for a car to go

00:43:52.600 by.

00:43:54.440 Or as a healthful person said,

00:43:57.200 I'd beat off.

00:43:58.820 I would go for a walk.

00:44:00.240 I'd play some sports.

00:44:02.520 Right?

00:44:03.140 And if I did any of those

00:44:04.660 things, my cortisol levels and

00:44:07.500 my adrenaline would go down.

00:44:09.960 I'd get back into a healthy mode

00:44:11.420 for a while.

00:44:11.860 But then later, you know,

00:44:13.660 some stressful thing would

00:44:14.680 happen.

00:44:15.780 So I'd be peaking and

00:44:18.020 valleying all day long.

00:44:19.440 Right?

00:44:19.640 Peaking and valleying.

00:44:21.040 Now, one assumes,

00:44:22.460 one assumes that the low points

00:44:27.560 are where you regain your health.

00:44:31.020 Imagine if you never got to

00:44:32.600 relax.

00:44:34.280 What if you had high stress

00:44:35.920 followed by more stress,

00:44:39.240 followed by more stress and

00:44:41.760 it never stopped?

00:44:44.300 All right.

00:44:44.860 What do you do in 2023

00:44:46.500 after a stressful situation?

00:44:49.960 So you feel stressed.

00:44:52.500 What do you do?

00:44:53.860 I'll tell you what I do.

00:44:55.860 Check my phone.

00:44:57.780 Check my phone.

00:44:59.380 So I'll be up in like high

00:45:00.640 stress area and I'll check my

00:45:02.160 phone.

00:45:03.180 And then my stress goes up a

00:45:05.980 little bit.

00:45:06.360 And then I got to go do

00:45:09.460 something else.

00:45:10.080 I can't play on my phone all

00:45:11.060 day.

00:45:11.440 So I go off to a stressful

00:45:13.380 situation and I stay there.

00:45:15.980 But now I've got a break.

00:45:18.000 I've got a break.

00:45:19.320 So I pick out my phone and I

00:45:21.060 look at Twitter and I'm like,

00:45:22.040 ah!

00:45:23.160 And my stress stays the same.

00:45:26.680 If I simply describe that

00:45:28.460 situation to you and then I

00:45:30.960 add on top of it something we

00:45:32.480 know for sure.

00:45:33.800 One thing we know for sure is

00:45:35.600 that all change causes

00:45:37.820 stress.

00:45:39.480 If you get married, it's 0.65

00:45:40.900 stressful.

00:45:41.320 If you get divorced, if you

00:45:42.440 change jobs, if you get a

00:45:44.080 promotion, it's stressful.

00:45:45.220 If you get fired, it's

00:45:46.200 stressful.

00:45:47.020 If the weather changes, it's

00:45:48.580 stressful.

00:45:49.580 If your finances change, it's

00:45:51.040 stressful.

00:45:51.660 If your relationships, you

00:45:52.780 know, everything.

00:45:54.160 Every change.

00:45:55.420 What is a bigger change than

00:45:57.740 the pandemic in your life?

00:46:00.880 For me, nothing.

00:46:02.780 That was it.

00:46:03.700 The pandemic was the biggest

00:46:05.620 stressor of my life.

00:46:07.640 How many of you would agree?

00:46:09.540 The biggest stressor that's not

00:46:10.940 part of your actual personal

00:46:12.360 experience, but, you know, the

00:46:13.740 external stressor.

00:46:16.800 Now, if you went to war, that'd be 0.64

00:46:18.540 worse.

00:46:19.580 But in my lifetime, I haven't

00:46:21.880 gone to war.

00:46:22.760 So, I asked on Twitter, I did a

00:46:27.880 little, you know, non-scientific

00:46:29.500 poll, and I said, rank your stress,

00:46:32.420 you know, before the pandemic

00:46:33.740 compared to, you know, during and

00:46:35.980 after.

00:46:37.420 And 31% said it's about the same,

00:46:40.960 stress level's about the same.

00:46:43.560 28% say it's a bit higher now than

00:46:46.360 before the pandemic.

00:46:47.140 And 24% say it's much higher.

00:46:50.820 Much higher.

00:46:53.740 And 17% say it's actually less

00:46:55.880 stress.

00:46:56.680 Now, the way I asked the question

00:46:58.960 was a problem, and, you know, it's a

00:47:01.760 non-scientific poll, so don't put too

00:47:03.740 much credibility into it.

00:47:05.120 But the way I asked the question, and

00:47:06.860 I could tell from the comments, people

00:47:09.080 thought that when I said stress, that

00:47:11.860 what I really meant was, do you trust

00:47:13.760 the so-called vaccination or not?

00:47:17.020 And that wasn't the question.

00:47:18.440 So, we're so primed to see it as

00:47:22.100 anti-vax or pro-vax that I asked about

00:47:25.200 people's stress in general, and they

00:47:27.620 answered it like I was asking about

00:47:29.160 vaccinations, which, you know, was a

00:47:32.660 small part of the whole.

00:47:34.640 So, people can't even answer a simple

00:47:36.840 poll in 2023 without thinking it's

00:47:40.260 about vaccinations.

00:47:41.080 Like, we're just so primed for war,

00:47:44.700 yes or no, conflict.

00:47:47.300 So, now imagine that we were in a

00:47:53.620 period in America where we had the

00:47:55.440 lowest level of trust in our leaders,

00:47:59.560 and that at the same time, we had the

00:48:02.300 biggest challenge they've ever had.

00:48:04.640 You know, maybe World War II was

00:48:05.840 bigger, but in, you know, in my

00:48:07.840 lifetime.

00:48:08.620 The pandemic was the biggest

00:48:09.720 leadership challenge.

00:48:11.280 So, imagine not trusting your own

00:48:13.140 leaders before the pandemic even

00:48:15.220 started.

00:48:16.540 And then you've got a pandemic, and

00:48:19.080 then all the leaders and the experts

00:48:20.520 start looking like maybe they're not

00:48:22.120 on your side so much.

00:48:23.440 It looks like a money grab.

00:48:25.500 And the, you know, the data and the

00:48:27.040 fog of war, you don't trust your data.

00:48:29.340 How stressful would it be to have one

00:48:31.960 of the biggest challenges at the same

00:48:34.280 time that you think the people in

00:48:35.600 charge of it are lying to you and

00:48:38.160 incompetent and maybe corrupt?

00:48:41.400 I can't even imagine anything more

00:48:42.940 stressful than that, you know, short of

00:48:44.380 war.

00:48:45.180 You know, let me be clear.

00:48:48.340 The Ukrainians have it a lot worse. 1.00

00:48:50.740 All right?

00:48:51.540 Just put that out there.

00:48:52.600 We're not comparing it to war.

00:48:55.340 But in terms of just ordinary life

00:48:57.320 stress, I don't think it's ever been

00:48:59.520 higher.

00:48:59.800 If I had told you, I'm going to take

00:49:04.440 25% of your public, and I'm going to

00:49:08.460 make them more stressed than they've

00:49:10.380 ever been in their life, do you get

00:49:13.220 more heart attacks?

00:49:15.440 Yes or no?

00:49:17.120 Do you get more heart attacks if I take

00:49:19.800 25% of the public and stress them beyond

00:49:22.080 what they've ever been stressed?

00:49:25.120 I think so.

00:49:26.500 Now, I'm not sure if that would

00:49:27.980 necessarily have athletes falling

00:49:30.540 over.

00:49:31.320 Do you?

00:49:32.000 I don't know that that would make

00:49:33.420 athletes start falling over in bigger

00:49:35.180 numbers.

00:49:35.960 Like, I kind of expect that would

00:49:37.340 affect people my age, you know, not

00:49:39.920 elite athletes.

00:49:41.540 But let me give you another hypothesis.

00:49:44.380 Do you think there's anything that

00:49:45.940 elite athletes imbibe that's different

00:49:50.300 from what you imbibe?

00:49:52.860 Probably.

00:49:54.160 Probably.

00:49:55.400 Because, you know, they would

00:49:56.480 supplement, they would, you know, maybe

00:49:58.560 some would cheat.

00:50:00.720 You know, maybe some performance

00:50:02.700 enhancing things, right?

00:50:04.920 What if there was one popular form

00:50:08.900 of, let's say, athletic performance

00:50:11.760 enhancing thing that a lot of people

00:50:14.260 were using and there was a bad batch?

00:50:17.620 Would you ever stop to think that there

00:50:21.820 was any problem but the vaccinations

00:50:23.480 is killing people?

00:50:24.900 You would not.

00:50:26.360 You would assume it was the

00:50:27.680 vaccinations.

00:50:28.940 And it might be.

00:50:30.060 So here's the part I have to say for

00:50:31.840 the clopberts.

00:50:33.540 Clopberts, I'm not saying that the 1.00

00:50:36.740 vaccinations are safe.

00:50:39.880 I'm saying I don't know how dangerous

00:50:42.080 they are.

00:50:42.820 But I'm also saying that if you assume

00:50:45.560 it's the only thing that would be

00:50:47.220 killing people, at the same time a lot

00:50:49.620 of things are changing.

00:50:50.480 There are a lot of other things

00:50:52.560 that are changing.

00:50:53.880 And I worry that it's like a

00:50:55.640 magician's trick.

00:50:57.340 We're watching the magician's two

00:50:59.180 hands.

00:51:00.300 You're like, oh, watch his left hand.

00:51:01.960 That's the vaccination one.

00:51:03.600 Watch his right hand.

00:51:04.480 That's the anti-vaccination one.

00:51:06.180 But this guy's only got two hands.

00:51:08.020 So if we watch those two hands,

00:51:09.580 we'll see the trick.

00:51:10.860 And while you're watching the

00:51:11.820 magician's two hands, the magician's

00:51:14.700 assistant is doing the trick.

00:51:16.900 Because you're looking in the wrong

00:51:20.040 place.

00:51:20.900 So here's the only thing I'm going to

00:51:22.600 add with certainty.

00:51:24.640 Everything else is just speculative.

00:51:26.740 But with certainty, we are blind to

00:51:30.000 any third killer.

00:51:32.800 I don't know that there is one.

00:51:39.880 Jenny says, Scott, apologize for

00:51:43.740 begging the government for mass

00:51:45.100 testing for two years.

00:51:46.700 No, we needed mass rapid testing.

00:51:49.900 That would have helped a lot.

00:51:52.140 Anybody who thinks that wouldn't

00:51:53.440 have helped?

00:51:55.100 Because the mass rapid testing would

00:51:56.900 help you make your own individual

00:51:58.260 decisions.

00:51:59.440 Are you opposed to people making

00:52:00.940 their individual health decisions

00:52:02.440 with data?

00:52:04.620 That's just a silly thing to be

00:52:05.900 against.

00:52:08.580 And by the way, the only reason we

00:52:10.140 didn't have them had to be

00:52:11.160 corruption.

00:52:11.520 All right.

00:52:14.260 So, have I made my point, have I

00:52:17.980 made my point that if there's a

00:52:20.360 third killer, there totally could

00:52:22.580 be, and we would be blind to it.

00:52:25.860 We would be blind to it.

00:52:29.080 Okay, that's all.

00:52:30.360 Yeah, I'm not going to state that

00:52:31.420 those are killing people, just that

00:52:32.740 we would be blind to it.

00:52:33.940 But I will state that the extra

00:52:35.340 stress is guaranteed to cause more

00:52:37.580 heart attacks.

00:52:38.120 How about that?

00:52:40.940 We don't know if that's what we're

00:52:42.480 seeing, but would you say with a

00:52:44.920 large population, if you

00:52:46.940 substantially increase their

00:52:48.520 stress, more heart attacks?

00:52:53.940 The part that, and again, I'll say

00:52:56.100 it again, but not necessarily the

00:52:58.880 athletes.

00:53:01.120 The athletes dying looks like it

00:53:02.900 could be, there could be a fourth

00:53:04.400 killer, right?

00:53:05.440 We could have four things killing

00:53:07.560 people, and only be seeing two,

00:53:10.400 because we're just tuned to those

00:53:12.180 two.

00:53:14.080 All right, here's the question I

00:53:15.200 asked.

00:53:16.280 If an evil hypnotist took control of

00:53:19.860 TikTok's algorithm, could they use it

00:53:23.100 to murder people in a demographic?

00:53:26.620 Now, not murder a specific person,

00:53:29.300 although it could probably do that.

00:53:30.540 But I'll say, could it murder lots of

00:53:34.480 people you don't know which ones, just

00:53:36.380 yes, absolutely.

00:53:40.140 If you gave me control of TikTok's

00:53:42.860 algorithm and said, here's who we want

00:53:45.880 you to target.

00:53:47.320 We want you to increase the death rate

00:53:49.520 in this group of people.

00:53:51.780 You don't think I could do that?

00:53:53.360 If I had control of the algorithm, and

00:53:56.460 I could say these people are going to

00:53:57.800 see this content?

00:53:58.600 Oh, I could do that.

00:54:01.780 Yeah, I could do mass murder, and it

00:54:05.060 wouldn't even be hard.

00:54:06.840 Like, you know, I'm not like the

00:54:09.260 super hypnotist or anything.

00:54:10.800 It would just be basic, pretty basic,

00:54:13.880 for somebody who had just ordinary

00:54:16.680 persuasion skills, if they were evil,

00:54:19.420 and if they had full control of the

00:54:21.020 algorithm.

00:54:22.160 Now, how lucky are we that China 1.00

00:54:27.400 hasn't figured that out, huh?

00:54:29.220 Huh?

00:54:30.020 How lucky are we that, you know, a

00:54:32.820 podcaster here in the United States

00:54:34.660 can easily see it?

00:54:36.680 Easily see it.

00:54:37.760 Very obvious.

00:54:38.740 And all of you, as soon as I said it,

00:54:41.160 said, well, you know, it is obvious.

00:54:44.400 You can definitely kill people if you

00:54:45.980 control the algorithm.

00:54:47.220 But aren't we lucky that China, 1.00

00:54:50.140 our adversary, who is sending in

00:54:53.760 fentanyl to kill us by the tens of

00:54:56.220 thousands every year, isn't it lucky

00:54:57.980 that they haven't, like, keyed in on

00:54:59.960 this?

00:55:01.760 Yeah.

00:55:02.340 By the way, do you know that they

00:55:03.560 don't allow TikTok to be used in

00:55:07.340 China? 0.73

00:55:08.240 Yeah, the Chinese owned TikTok.

00:55:11.260 It's not allowed in China.

00:55:13.600 They have a different version that

00:55:15.000 doesn't have any of the problems.

00:55:17.660 Yeah.

00:55:18.100 So how lucky, lucky, lucky, lucky,

00:55:21.140 lucky that the Chinese government

00:55:23.200 government hasn't figured out what

00:55:24.800 every one of you know and is

00:55:26.400 obvious, that they could use that

00:55:28.360 algorithm to kill Americans.

00:55:35.740 Now, do you have any doubt that our

00:55:38.580 Congress is corrupt?

00:55:41.300 None.

00:55:42.480 None.

00:55:42.780 Now, there may be members of Congress

00:55:45.800 who are not corrupt.

00:55:46.720 Like, I have a good feeling about, you

00:55:49.780 know, Thomas Massey and Paul Rand and

00:55:52.400 a number of others, but clearly, the

00:55:56.540 reason that TikTok is still legal in

00:55:58.340 the United States clearly is

00:56:00.440 corruption.

00:56:02.040 There's nothing else it could be.

00:56:04.960 Nobody's even offered another

00:56:06.820 hypothesis.

00:56:08.780 Right?

00:56:09.520 Had there been another hypothesis where

00:56:12.280 somebody says, you know, Scott, you're

00:56:14.380 forgetting all these good reasons why

00:56:16.360 it might not be so easy.

00:56:18.540 There is no other argument.

00:56:21.380 Do we have any other national topic

00:56:23.900 where everybody's on the same side?

00:56:27.020 I've never seen one.

00:56:28.780 Everybody.

00:56:29.960 100% of the Congress is on the same

00:56:32.160 side.

00:56:32.480 And yet, TikTok's not banned.

00:56:37.020 Not banned.

00:56:38.600 Not even close.

00:56:40.080 There's not a vote.

00:56:41.460 I don't believe there's any

00:56:42.340 legislation.

00:56:44.080 There's no conversation.

00:56:46.360 Right?

00:56:48.360 That has to be massive corruption.

00:56:53.240 Give me any other hypothesis.

00:56:56.620 Any other hypothesis.

00:56:58.780 There is none.

00:57:00.460 It's obvious.

00:57:01.320 And it's like the rapid testing

00:57:03.200 scandal.

00:57:04.980 That the news treated as like it

00:57:06.840 wasn't a scandal.

00:57:07.560 Well, the biggest corruption we've

00:57:09.740 ever seen, unless we find out

00:57:11.320 something about the vaccinations

00:57:12.460 was as sketchy as it looks.

00:57:16.100 Was it even covered in the news?

00:57:17.960 Does the news cover the fact that

00:57:19.500 there's no debate on TikTok and yet

00:57:21.920 no action?

00:57:23.420 No.

00:57:24.340 No.

00:57:24.700 It's not covered on the left.

00:57:26.580 And it's not covered on the right.

00:57:28.380 Now, in both cases, they complain

00:57:30.840 about fentanyl.

00:57:31.560 And they complain about fentanyl deaths.

00:57:35.300 But they don't complain about

00:57:37.220 TikTok killing people and then tell

00:57:40.580 us that nobody's doing anything about

00:57:41.980 it when that's obviously the case.

00:57:45.540 What else could it be?

00:57:46.900 I mean, really.

00:57:48.420 Now, here's a perfect situation where

00:57:51.380 if I were talking about an individual

00:57:53.920 human citizen, I would not say that

00:57:57.440 they're guilty without proof.

00:57:59.780 I'd say, no, no, a citizen is innocent.

00:58:03.500 You better bring some serious proof

00:58:05.860 if you're going to accuse a citizen

00:58:07.960 of a crime.

00:58:09.360 But the government?

00:58:11.400 The government is presumed guilty

00:58:13.100 unless they can show you some

00:58:14.480 transparency to show you that

00:58:16.440 they're treating you seriously.

00:58:17.680 And they have no transparency,

00:58:19.540 no argument.

00:58:21.300 They are guilty by definition.

00:58:25.080 In the same way a citizen is

00:58:27.160 innocent by definition,

00:58:28.620 you know, our system just defines it

00:58:31.120 that way, until guilty.

00:58:32.740 The government, by definition,

00:58:34.600 is guilty.

00:58:35.840 By definition.

00:58:37.100 If they won't tell you or even engage

00:58:39.040 in the conversation,

00:58:40.700 that's just guilty.

00:58:41.840 And anything that you assume otherwise

00:58:43.560 doesn't make sense.

00:58:48.160 Yeah.

00:58:48.900 Yeah, the TikTok is an educational product

00:58:52.180 in China.

00:58:54.020 All right.

00:58:59.280 And that, ladies and gentlemen,

00:59:04.560 let me give you another insight into this.

00:59:08.780 I'm not going to tell you what the topic was,

00:59:11.860 but several weeks ago,

00:59:14.400 social media was messing with my head

00:59:19.620 because I made the mistake

00:59:21.140 of looking at some specific content,

00:59:23.720 you know, nothing disgusting,

00:59:25.200 don't be weird.

00:59:26.420 I looked at some content,

00:59:27.880 you know, legal, ordinary content,

00:59:29.760 and then the algorithm started serving me

00:59:31.940 more of it.

00:59:34.080 And it really messed with my life

00:59:36.680 because I couldn't break the habit

00:59:39.680 of looking at,

00:59:41.520 it was Instagram,

00:59:43.400 I couldn't break the habit,

00:59:44.560 but it was feeding me things

00:59:46.520 that made it impossible to sleep.

00:59:49.280 I couldn't sleep,

00:59:50.940 like, for weeks.

00:59:52.340 And it was only because

00:59:53.080 there was a recurring thought

00:59:54.900 that the algorithm

00:59:57.420 kept putting in my head.

00:59:58.600 And every time it would, like,

00:59:59.780 wear off,

01:00:00.900 every time I looked at it,

01:00:01.900 it would go back in my head.

01:00:03.280 Now, it doesn't matter

01:00:04.660 what the content is,

01:00:06.900 it only matters that

01:00:08.280 I couldn't turn it off

01:00:09.500 and I couldn't stop looking at it.

01:00:11.260 So that actually

01:00:16.180 caused me major health problems,

01:00:19.360 like actual health problems

01:00:21.020 from Instagram algorithm.

01:00:23.720 Not a joke,

01:00:25.520 very clearly a health problem

01:00:28.640 because I couldn't sleep

01:00:29.920 more than a few hours a night

01:00:31.200 for night after night.

01:00:32.900 That's a health problem.

01:00:34.000 That's a pretty major health problem, right?

01:00:36.180 And that came just from the algorithm.

01:00:38.960 And it wasn't because

01:00:40.000 I looked for something.

01:00:41.260 It was because something

01:00:42.300 was served to me.

01:00:43.680 And now it wasn't about

01:00:44.400 my personal life.

01:00:47.060 Then, here's another one.

01:00:50.440 I found some humor

01:00:52.160 and interest

01:00:52.940 in some anti-relationship content.

01:00:57.040 Meaning it was people saying

01:00:58.800 that men and women

01:01:00.080 basically are never going

01:01:01.940 to get along.

01:01:03.240 Because there's something

01:01:04.220 about modern life

01:01:05.180 which has made men and women

01:01:07.540 toxic to each other.

01:01:09.040 Like, we just don't have a way

01:01:10.240 to be partners anymore.

01:01:11.920 And it was basically

01:01:13.420 very strongly

01:01:15.260 would encourage you

01:01:16.100 never to get married

01:01:17.100 or be in a serious relationship.

01:01:20.400 And once I looked at some of them,

01:01:23.120 the algorithm started giving me

01:01:24.700 just bearing me with

01:01:27.040 don't be in a relationship.

01:01:31.000 Now, would that be a benefit

01:01:32.440 to China

01:01:33.340 to have an algorithm

01:01:35.300 convince people

01:01:36.160 not to get married

01:01:37.000 and have children?

01:01:37.620 Yeah.

01:01:40.580 Yup.

01:01:41.960 If I were in charge

01:01:43.680 of the algorithm,

01:01:45.000 I would be promoting

01:01:46.660 don't have children,

01:01:49.020 don't get married,

01:01:50.400 don't do any kind

01:01:51.560 of classical relationship.

01:01:53.400 It's all broken.

01:01:54.960 You have to go do something

01:01:56.680 totally different

01:01:57.500 and it'll just feed you

01:01:59.080 over and over again.

01:02:00.280 And I started getting inundated.

01:02:01.880 And at first,

01:02:03.920 I thought,

01:02:04.420 whoa, these are,

01:02:05.600 I love the fact

01:02:06.360 that these are

01:02:06.880 outside the mainstream.

01:02:08.660 Right?

01:02:09.020 I love the way

01:02:10.340 it's expressed.

01:02:11.760 The people who are

01:02:12.780 on these videos

01:02:13.620 were really good.

01:02:15.040 They were just charismatic.

01:02:16.920 They had good

01:02:17.940 communication skills.

01:02:19.060 And as content,

01:02:21.180 it was good stuff.

01:02:22.560 Just as content,

01:02:23.500 entertaining.

01:02:24.640 But what did it do

01:02:25.440 to my life?

01:02:27.400 If I had been

01:02:28.240 a younger person

01:02:29.280 and I was,

01:02:30.460 you know,

01:02:30.720 questioning whether

01:02:31.440 I get married

01:02:32.040 and have kids,

01:02:32.960 it would absolutely

01:02:34.020 have reprogrammed me.

01:02:35.180 It was strong enough

01:02:37.020 that it would have

01:02:38.420 changed my

01:02:39.580 procreation

01:02:41.920 preferences.

01:02:44.480 It would have changed

01:02:46.320 my reproductive

01:02:48.580 preferences.

01:02:50.880 And I could feel it

01:02:52.140 in real time.

01:02:53.420 Like,

01:02:53.820 I could feel it

01:02:54.780 changing my brain.

01:02:57.540 Right?

01:02:57.880 And you saw me

01:02:58.580 mention it a number

01:02:59.500 of times

01:03:00.040 because you could see

01:03:00.920 it was taking up

01:03:02.480 a little real estate.

01:03:05.300 And now,

01:03:06.340 just imagine somebody

01:03:07.300 doing that intentionally.

01:03:09.500 Maybe it is intentional.

01:03:11.140 No way to know.

01:03:12.320 But imagine if I had

01:03:13.980 control of the algorithm.

01:03:16.500 There's two examples

01:03:17.800 where I know

01:03:19.020 I could make you

01:03:19.660 less healthy.

01:03:21.180 I could make you

01:03:22.100 less healthy

01:03:22.600 because I experienced it.

01:03:24.100 I'd give you

01:03:24.620 just disturbing images

01:03:25.760 and you wouldn't

01:03:26.240 sleep well.

01:03:27.220 And then your health

01:03:27.860 would be bad.

01:03:30.360 Or I could tell you

01:03:31.480 that the things

01:03:32.120 which we know

01:03:32.760 are good for you

01:03:33.640 are really bad for you.

01:03:35.820 For example,

01:03:37.360 if you were China,

01:03:39.260 would you let

01:03:40.000 the algorithm

01:03:40.720 present lots of

01:03:43.200 being overweight

01:03:45.440 is good for you

01:03:46.680 content?

01:03:49.340 Would you?

01:03:50.940 Do you think

01:03:51.920 that the United States,

01:03:53.280 which has always

01:03:53.880 had a history

01:03:54.520 of telling people

01:03:55.660 to exercise,

01:03:57.020 right,

01:03:57.460 through the 60s

01:03:58.360 and 70s

01:03:59.100 and Arnold Schwarzenegger,

01:04:00.580 the government

01:04:01.740 has always said,

01:04:02.680 oh, exercise,

01:04:03.560 exercise is good for you.

01:04:05.760 But what would China

01:04:08.020 want the United States

01:04:09.100 to do?

01:04:09.540 China would want us

01:04:11.440 to value our fatness

01:04:13.180 and say,

01:04:14.500 don't change me.

01:04:15.680 This is just me.

01:04:17.020 Body positivity.

01:04:18.900 And by the way,

01:04:19.960 the women can all 1.00

01:04:20.980 weigh 400 pounds

01:04:22.180 and you men,

01:04:23.480 you still want to

01:04:24.380 mate with them

01:04:25.060 because, you know,

01:04:27.040 you don't want

01:04:27.420 to be a jerk. 0.79

01:04:29.660 Yeah.

01:04:30.900 China could absolutely 0.86

01:04:32.260 end us

01:04:32.960 just with TikTok.

01:04:35.840 And our Congress

01:04:37.220 is completely blind

01:04:38.700 to it.

01:04:40.100 That's the best

01:04:40.900 case scenario.

01:04:42.100 But I think

01:04:42.880 they're bought off.

01:04:44.340 I think they're

01:04:44.880 bought off.

01:04:45.940 So at this point,

01:04:46.880 China has the fentanyl

01:04:48.400 in our veins

01:04:49.060 and they got the finger

01:04:50.740 on the plunger

01:04:51.500 and the best

01:04:53.200 we can hope for

01:04:54.060 is they don't push

01:04:56.360 their finger

01:04:56.780 on the plunger.

01:04:58.240 But the needle's

01:04:59.140 in our arm,

01:05:00.180 right?

01:05:00.640 The TikTok's here.

01:05:02.080 It's already

01:05:02.760 in our kids' hands.

01:05:04.340 The needle's in.

01:05:05.920 All they have to do

01:05:06.760 is push the plunger

01:05:07.660 and they can take

01:05:08.880 out our whole society

01:05:09.880 if they haven't

01:05:13.000 already.

01:05:16.380 Because what would

01:05:17.260 it look like

01:05:17.820 if they did?

01:05:20.460 Body positivity.

01:05:23.980 Maybe you should

01:05:25.480 try being gay. 0.86

01:05:28.900 Maybe you shouldn't

01:05:29.740 get married.

01:05:32.720 Maybe you should

01:05:33.560 complain more

01:05:34.160 about wokeness

01:05:34.920 because that's

01:05:35.340 what's important.

01:05:38.500 Almost everything

01:05:39.620 that's on social media

01:05:40.960 is destructive.

01:05:45.480 Now, here's what

01:05:46.500 I don't know.

01:05:47.660 Is there also

01:05:48.440 a thriving TikTok

01:05:50.240 pro-health exercise

01:05:53.020 part of it

01:05:54.300 that I never see?

01:05:56.220 Maybe.

01:05:57.520 But, you know,

01:05:58.580 that would still

01:05:59.400 get lost in the noise.

01:06:00.600 All right.

01:06:09.860 Yeah, there's one.

01:06:12.640 If China wanted 0.91

01:06:13.540 to destroy

01:06:14.160 the United States,

01:06:15.220 would they promote

01:06:16.400 Andrew Tate's

01:06:18.240 videos?

01:06:21.020 Think about it.

01:06:22.700 If China wanted 0.91

01:06:23.700 to destroy

01:06:24.360 the United States,

01:06:25.280 would they promote

01:06:26.080 Andrew Tate's

01:06:27.040 videos?

01:06:27.340 Who was the

01:06:29.840 most viral

01:06:30.660 content

01:06:31.200 recently?

01:06:35.060 Andrew Tate.

01:06:36.480 The most viral

01:06:37.220 and TikTok

01:06:38.180 was the

01:06:39.100 leading cause

01:06:40.260 of that, right?

01:06:41.520 It was mostly

01:06:42.100 a TikTok thing.

01:06:44.680 So China 0.92

01:06:45.320 may have decided

01:06:47.800 unless the algorithm

01:06:49.260 did it itself

01:06:50.040 because Tate

01:06:50.840 did a lot of things

01:06:51.520 to make things

01:06:52.140 viral.

01:06:52.820 So, I mean,

01:06:53.380 he was pushing

01:06:54.700 himself.

01:06:55.620 So we don't know

01:06:56.140 if maybe that was

01:06:57.120 enough.

01:07:00.640 It looks like

01:07:01.380 they're trying

01:07:01.720 to encourage

01:07:02.240 obesity.

01:07:03.220 Yeah.

01:07:05.600 So I would just

01:07:06.740 put that out there

01:07:07.800 that the needles

01:07:09.740 in the arm

01:07:10.300 and we're trusting

01:07:11.600 our adversary

01:07:12.520 not to push

01:07:13.360 the plunger.

01:07:14.600 So great job,

01:07:15.540 Congress.

01:07:16.400 That, ladies and

01:07:17.260 gentlemen,

01:07:17.520 is the best

01:07:18.360 live stream

01:07:19.020 you've ever seen.

01:07:20.100 I hope it

01:07:20.620 challenged your

01:07:21.540 current thinking.

01:07:22.780 I don't know

01:07:23.060 if anything I'm

01:07:23.640 saying is true,

01:07:24.580 but I know

01:07:26.560 we're not

01:07:26.980 thinking broadly

01:07:29.040 enough about

01:07:29.940 what the

01:07:31.000 possibilities are.

01:07:32.440 That being

01:07:32.960 my theme

01:07:33.560 of the day.

01:07:34.580 And YouTube,

01:07:35.240 I'm going to say

01:07:35.580 goodbye to you

01:07:36.060 now.

01:07:37.160 I'm going to

01:07:37.620 talk to the

01:07:38.320 locals

01:07:39.400 platform

01:07:40.320 privately

01:07:40.960 and I will

01:07:43.120 see you tomorrow.

01:07:44.280 Bye for now.

01:07:45.440 Best live stream

01:07:46.100 you've ever seen.

01:07:46.640 минут,

01:07:48.640 Gilmore,

01:07:49.980 September 16,

01:07:50.240 April 16,

01:07:50.740 June 16,

01:07:51.660 June 16,

01:07:52.600 March 16,

01:07:54.060 June 16,

01:07:54.640 June 16,

01:07:55.420 December 17,

01:07:56.740 June 17,

01:07:57.880 In여 Larsen,

01:07:57.940 August 16,

01:07:58.660 June 26,

01:07:59.380 June 23,

01:08:00.640 June 17,

01:08:02.440 June 17,

01:08:03.240 June 17,

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - January 14, 2023

Episode 1988 Scott Adams： Everything The News Gets Wrong Because They Are Not Engineers

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript