Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 1988 Scott Adams： Everything The News Gets Wrong Because They Are Not Engineers

00:00:00.000 Good morning ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the highlight of civilization.

00:00:09.120 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams and I'm pretty sure you've never enjoyed anything

00:00:13.840 as much as you can enjoy the next approximately one hour.

00:00:18.840 No, I'm not bound by any hard guidelines of timing.

00:00:23.120 No, not at all.

00:00:24.360 I can make it as long or as short as I want.

00:00:27.740 Don't make any jokes.

00:00:29.180 Now, how would you like to take your experience up to levels that nobody's ever seen?

00:00:37.120 Ever?

00:00:38.140 And all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass of tank or chalice of dine, a canteen jug or

00:00:42.060 flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:44.080 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:45.240 I like coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine of the day, the thing

00:00:53.160 that makes everything better.

00:00:54.100 It's called the simultaneous sip and it happens now.

00:00:55.820 Go.

00:00:59.180 Hold it, hold it, hold it, hold it, everybody.

00:01:02.340 Hold it.

00:01:06.160 We have a request to wait.

00:01:08.060 Somebody wasn't quite ready.

00:01:10.280 Okay, this is the real one.

00:01:12.020 First one didn't count.

00:01:14.040 Go.

00:01:14.660 Go.

00:01:15.100 Okay, I think we got everybody on board there.

00:01:21.480 We will leave no viewer behind.

00:01:25.640 We're like the Marines that way.

00:01:28.580 While President Biden was bragging, the gas is down more than $1.70 from its peak.

00:01:35.460 That adds up to around $180 per month for a typical family.

00:01:42.760 That's money in your pocket, not spent at the pump, he says.

00:01:46.820 Money in your pocket.

00:01:48.560 Yeah.

00:01:48.760 Does this kind of analysis remind you of anything?

00:01:55.600 Is there any fictional character who might be well known for saying this sort of thing?

00:02:04.000 And might that fictional character be a comic?

00:02:09.820 And might it involve a boss with pointy hair?

00:02:13.860 And might it involve a boss who says,

00:02:17.380 Hey, we could have wasted a million dollars this year,

00:02:21.160 but we only wasted half a million,

00:02:23.520 and that's money in your pocket.

00:02:25.740 That's money in your pocket.

00:02:27.540 I could have done worse.

00:02:29.900 So, you're welcome.

00:02:31.480 That literally is a Dilbert comic.

00:02:37.060 Not just one.

00:02:38.460 I'm pretty sure I've hit that theme a few times.

00:02:41.480 And you know what?

00:02:42.420 I'm going to hit it again.

00:02:44.700 I'll probably hit that theme again.

00:02:47.260 Yes, bragging about how things could have been so much worse,

00:02:51.520 and therefore, because they're not worse,

00:02:54.600 money in your pocket.

00:02:56.160 That's money in your pocket, baby.

00:02:57.580 Do you see there's a new Martin Luther King statue?

00:03:03.860 Some people say that viewed from a certain angle,

00:03:07.200 it looks a little different than maybe what the creator hoped.

00:03:13.480 I think they're suggesting it looks like a giant,

00:03:16.960 oh, I can't say that on live stream,

00:03:19.960 a giant thing.

00:03:22.040 But that's only from one point of view.

00:03:25.800 Now, I think I saw a Mike Cernovich tweet

00:03:29.580 asking what we do about this statue.

00:03:33.800 Because it turns out, at the same time,

00:03:36.580 the statue's going up.

00:03:37.760 I think it was Politico had an article about

00:03:39.660 some researcher, biographer,

00:03:42.280 who's come up with a bunch of dirt on MLK.

00:03:45.840 Apparently, MLK would not have survived the Me Too era,

00:03:49.280 if the allegations are correct.

00:03:52.600 And so now you have an interesting situation.

00:03:55.600 What happens if the most storied and famous leader

00:04:01.920 of the black community turns out to be a Me Too person,

00:04:06.500 and then maybe a criminal of the female part of the public,

00:04:12.820 and other people, too, as well?

00:04:14.240 That would be an interesting battle of power, wouldn't it?

00:04:19.860 Who do you think would win?

00:04:21.740 Who has more power in today's world?

00:04:25.000 Black America or female America?

00:04:30.960 I would think female, because there are more of them, right?

00:04:33.640 Numbers.

00:04:35.300 More than half of the world, I think.

00:04:38.100 Or more than half of the United States, anyway.

00:04:39.600 So, we'll see.

00:04:42.720 But I think it's optimistic to assume

00:04:48.020 that that statue will not be pulled down.

00:04:51.320 Now, one reason it might not be pulled down

00:04:54.000 is if it's mostly women who are complaining.

00:04:58.940 They don't have the upper body strength,

00:05:01.580 so statue's safe.

00:05:03.200 No, I'm just joking.

00:05:07.280 Because everybody cares about Me Too, not just women.

00:05:10.480 So, I'm just being provocative.

00:05:14.340 I don't think that statue's going to come down.

00:05:16.280 Nor do I think it should.

00:05:18.060 But it does raise some interesting questions

00:05:21.040 in our complicated times.

00:05:24.160 All right.

00:05:24.880 I may have told you before,

00:05:26.380 but there's a phrase on Twitter

00:05:28.920 that will get you instantly blocked.

00:05:31.040 And I don't care if you say it to me

00:05:33.640 or someone else.

00:05:36.180 If you use these words about anybody,

00:05:39.760 doesn't matter if it's about me,

00:05:41.900 if you use this to explain anybody

00:05:44.540 or to talk to anybody,

00:05:45.940 you are instantly blocked.

00:05:47.720 And here's the phrase.

00:05:50.240 You're better than this.

00:05:52.420 You're better than this.

00:05:55.000 Nope.

00:05:56.340 No.

00:05:57.740 I am exactly as good as whatever I'm doing.

00:06:01.040 If there's one thing I'm never going to back off from,

00:06:06.340 you are what you do.

00:06:08.500 You are what you do.

00:06:11.200 If you do something and somebody doesn't like it,

00:06:14.020 you're not better than that.

00:06:15.540 You're exactly that.

00:06:17.320 And you might be happy about it.

00:06:18.640 You might not be apologizing at all.

00:06:20.300 You are that.

00:06:21.320 Yes, I did that.

00:06:22.980 That is who I am.

00:06:23.900 And here's why I don't like the phrase

00:06:27.440 you're better than that.

00:06:28.920 Because it's emotionally manipulative

00:06:31.300 and it acts as though

00:06:33.500 I should organize my life

00:06:36.200 around a stranger's approval.

00:06:39.160 Why would I organize my life

00:06:40.860 around the approval of a stranger?

00:06:43.200 And why does that person think

00:06:44.620 they can impose that on me?

00:06:46.460 And why would they be dumb enough

00:06:48.000 to say it in public?

00:06:49.620 That their opinion should monitor

00:06:51.760 and should change my behavior

00:06:54.340 and make me a different person?

00:06:56.840 I don't think there's anything

00:06:57.940 that bothers me more than that phrase

00:06:59.700 because it's just manipulative.

00:07:02.420 How many of you would agree

00:07:03.900 it's just pure manipulation?

00:07:05.760 And here's the other thing.

00:07:08.740 Anybody who would use that phrase,

00:07:10.800 especially in public,

00:07:12.920 would you want to be friends with that person?

00:07:15.300 Because that tells you

00:07:17.300 where their mentality is, right?

00:07:22.500 All right.

00:07:25.980 Okay.

00:07:26.880 Recommendation there.

00:07:30.540 You know,

00:07:31.660 as much as I appreciate

00:07:34.220 the super comments on YouTube,

00:07:36.520 I think YouTube should get rid of them.

00:07:38.540 What do you think?

00:07:39.800 Because when you stop to read

00:07:41.180 a super comment,

00:07:43.360 often it's not on the topic

00:07:45.040 you're talking about.

00:07:46.360 And I feel like,

00:07:48.240 you know,

00:07:48.520 the law of reciprocity,

00:07:51.080 when somebody does anything for you,

00:07:53.240 you just automatically feel like

00:07:54.600 you owe them something.

00:07:55.480 We're all designed that way.

00:07:56.940 So the problem with this model

00:07:58.240 is that,

00:07:59.920 especially if it's people I like,

00:08:01.460 like sometimes they'll come from people

00:08:02.820 I know personally

00:08:04.120 and I like them.

00:08:05.460 But if it's not on the same topic,

00:08:08.660 it's not good for everybody else.

00:08:10.480 So it's like paying $20

00:08:11.700 to go to the top of the line.

00:08:15.180 Now,

00:08:15.420 if you go to the top of the line

00:08:16.580 on the topic we're talking about,

00:08:18.760 I think that's cool.

00:08:21.300 You know,

00:08:21.840 because if you make a good point,

00:08:23.520 it doesn't matter

00:08:24.060 if you paid or didn't pay.

00:08:25.560 But if it's a different topic,

00:08:28.120 that's probably not the best way

00:08:29.360 to use the super chat.

00:08:30.600 So just keep that in mind.

00:08:32.680 You know,

00:08:32.940 the feature is there

00:08:34.400 so you can use it

00:08:35.220 like there's no crime.

00:08:36.680 But just as a preference,

00:08:38.520 I would rather you not give me money.

00:08:40.780 Is that fair?

00:08:42.540 I would rather you not give me money

00:08:44.600 in that particular way.

00:08:47.860 But thank you.

00:08:49.740 Let me show some gratitude.

00:08:52.040 Thank you.

00:08:52.740 Because I think the people who do it

00:08:53.880 usually have the right,

00:08:55.080 you know,

00:08:55.540 the right thought in mind.

00:08:57.440 And I appreciate that.

00:09:00.220 All right.

00:09:00.800 The Trump Organization,

00:09:01.960 I guess,

00:09:02.320 is going to pay

00:09:02.980 a $1.6 million fine,

00:09:05.220 a criminal fine.

00:09:07.420 The news likes to make sure

00:09:09.040 you know it's a criminal fine

00:09:10.220 for what their CTO apparently did.

00:09:14.860 Now,

00:09:15.400 I'm having a little trouble

00:09:16.380 understanding this story.

00:09:18.600 And maybe somebody who's

00:09:19.820 maybe more clued into

00:09:22.440 either the specifics of this case

00:09:25.340 or the legal structure of the world

00:09:29.540 maybe can sort this out for me.

00:09:32.160 So here's what I understand.

00:09:34.320 The,

00:09:34.940 oh, is this CFO?

00:09:36.240 I'm sorry.

00:09:36.880 CFO.

00:09:37.540 The financial guy,

00:09:38.460 not the technical guy.

00:09:39.840 Yeah.

00:09:40.100 So the CFO of Trump Organization,

00:09:44.140 I accidentally said CTO,

00:09:46.480 but the CFO,

00:09:47.440 the financial guy,

00:09:49.080 apparently was in charge of,

00:09:51.140 you know,

00:09:51.420 the accounting

00:09:51.960 and how things were recorded.

00:09:54.980 and he paid himself

00:09:58.400 without going through payroll

00:10:01.400 by having the Trump Organization

00:10:03.980 pay some of his expenses directly.

00:10:06.760 Now,

00:10:07.140 that's illegal

00:10:07.800 because it didn't get taxed

00:10:09.800 in the way that the system requires it.

00:10:12.200 Now,

00:10:12.620 here's the problem.

00:10:14.520 Because it happened

00:10:15.760 and because the CFO is an officer

00:10:19.240 of the company,

00:10:21.020 the company is also on the hook

00:10:23.560 because although it was one person

00:10:26.100 who seems to be involved,

00:10:27.320 as far as we know,

00:10:28.000 just one person,

00:10:29.120 and the one person

00:10:30.080 was the person who does it

00:10:31.020 for the company.

00:10:32.520 So,

00:10:33.160 it's a weird situation

00:10:34.260 where the Trump Organization

00:10:36.460 was a victim of a crime

00:10:38.460 and they have to pay a penalty

00:10:41.440 for being a victim of a crime.

00:10:45.520 Now,

00:10:46.060 it's a little unclear

00:10:46.980 if the Trump Organization

00:10:48.700 made or lost any money

00:10:51.320 because of the way this was handled.

00:10:54.280 They should have come out

00:10:55.280 about the same.

00:10:57.240 You know,

00:10:57.420 certainly it would not have been,

00:10:58.920 it would not have been

00:10:59.860 a big enough crime

00:11:00.760 that the Trump Organization

00:11:02.900 would have had any intention

00:11:05.280 to do it.

00:11:06.500 Here's how you know

00:11:07.240 there's no intention

00:11:08.100 because it wouldn't be worth it.

00:11:11.320 The Trump Organization

00:11:12.580 would save maybe nothing,

00:11:15.660 you know,

00:11:15.880 or maybe a little bit

00:11:17.200 on some kind of payroll-related tax

00:11:20.040 that you wouldn't,

00:11:21.020 if it's just a straight expense.

00:11:22.760 In both cases,

00:11:23.880 it probably got,

00:11:24.560 it was written off

00:11:25.400 as an expense,

00:11:26.900 right?

00:11:27.760 So,

00:11:28.220 if the company pays it in payroll,

00:11:29.560 that's a write-off,

00:11:31.120 but if they pay it directly,

00:11:33.160 that's another,

00:11:34.160 but there's a little,

00:11:34.880 little extra

00:11:35.660 that you pay,

00:11:37.160 a little extra taxes

00:11:37.960 to pay to support

00:11:39.280 an employee

00:11:40.300 that you don't pay

00:11:41.000 for a regular expense.

00:11:42.300 So there might have been

00:11:43.200 like a little benefit

00:11:44.400 to the Trump Organization,

00:11:46.340 but given the size

00:11:47.820 of the organization

00:11:48.560 and the tiny amount

00:11:50.880 of benefit,

00:11:51.860 really just the

00:11:52.660 employee-related taxes

00:11:54.360 for one person,

00:11:55.880 there's no way

00:11:57.660 that anybody

00:11:59.240 besides the benefactor

00:12:01.300 would have okayed that.

00:12:03.760 In other words,

00:12:04.620 had Trump

00:12:06.080 or,

00:12:07.160 you know,

00:12:08.100 Don Jr.

00:12:09.160 or anybody

00:12:09.940 who was in charge,

00:12:11.060 if any of them

00:12:12.000 had been presented

00:12:12.900 with this option,

00:12:14.320 hey,

00:12:15.160 how about you pay

00:12:15.920 my expenses

00:12:16.600 instead of paying me?

00:12:18.620 I'll save a lot

00:12:19.580 on taxes.

00:12:20.780 You'll save a little bit,

00:12:22.940 but if you get caught,

00:12:25.120 it's like really bad.

00:12:27.060 Nobody would approve that

00:12:28.120 because the cost-benefit

00:12:30.020 doesn't make any sense.

00:12:31.580 You would never

00:12:31.980 put yourself

00:12:32.600 in that position.

00:12:34.000 So,

00:12:34.920 am I interpreting

00:12:36.120 this incorrectly,

00:12:37.800 that the Trump Organization

00:12:38.980 is a victim

00:12:39.900 of a crime

00:12:40.660 that one individual

00:12:43.180 in the company

00:12:43.880 committed.

00:12:45.540 There were two victims.

00:12:46.940 One is the taxpayers,

00:12:48.380 us,

00:12:49.440 and the other victim

00:12:50.300 is the Trump Organization

00:12:51.460 because there's no way

00:12:52.780 in the world

00:12:53.200 they would have

00:12:53.780 greenlit those activities.

00:12:56.360 The risk-reward

00:12:57.640 wouldn't make no sense,

00:12:59.040 no sense at all.

00:13:00.500 Right?

00:13:01.540 So,

00:13:02.760 the fact that this

00:13:04.780 is being reported

00:13:05.520 like it's some kind

00:13:06.340 of a Trump-related crime

00:13:07.920 when they're literally

00:13:09.260 the victim of the crime,

00:13:10.660 literally the victim

00:13:12.000 of the crime,

00:13:12.580 I think.

00:13:13.880 There's no upside

00:13:14.800 for them.

00:13:16.900 All right,

00:13:17.180 so that's your first

00:13:18.240 backwards news of the day.

00:13:21.580 So,

00:13:22.160 I tweeted yesterday

00:13:23.100 a,

00:13:23.520 you know,

00:13:24.500 strange little thought

00:13:26.060 and I said that

00:13:26.720 I think it would be

00:13:27.200 a good standard

00:13:27.900 for social behavior

00:13:29.060 to ignore anything

00:13:30.600 a person said

00:13:31.380 before the age of 25

00:13:32.720 because young people

00:13:34.840 are works in progress

00:13:35.840 and we usually improve.

00:13:37.400 Now,

00:13:37.880 this is based on

00:13:38.580 a specific story

00:13:39.680 in the news

00:13:40.240 that I'm not

00:13:40.720 going to repeat

00:13:41.320 to be consistent.

00:13:43.580 I'm not going

00:13:44.200 to repeat the story

00:13:44.960 because I don't think

00:13:45.740 we should be talking

00:13:46.520 about what somebody

00:13:47.340 said when they were

00:13:48.080 a young person.

00:13:50.080 Right?

00:13:50.400 So,

00:13:50.780 I don't even want

00:13:51.280 to give you enough

00:13:51.800 details that you

00:13:52.480 could Google it.

00:13:53.800 That's how much

00:13:54.400 I don't want

00:13:54.920 to talk about it.

00:13:56.020 But the concept,

00:13:56.960 I think,

00:13:57.180 is important.

00:13:58.500 So,

00:13:58.840 you know,

00:13:59.860 I looked at

00:14:01.080 the tweet today

00:14:02.200 and it's like

00:14:02.780 1.9 million views.

00:14:05.400 Now,

00:14:08.080 a normal tweet

00:14:08.760 of mine

00:14:09.080 might get like

00:14:09.740 10,000

00:14:11.160 or 50,000 views.

00:14:13.180 It's got

00:14:13.780 1.9 million views.

00:14:16.820 So,

00:14:17.420 I was like,

00:14:17.840 what's going on here?

00:14:18.720 And then I go,

00:14:19.120 oh,

00:14:19.580 Elon Musk

00:14:20.220 commented.

00:14:22.420 So,

00:14:22.680 Elon Musk

00:14:23.140 commented,

00:14:23.960 if not,

00:14:24.780 perhaps,

00:14:25.260 you know,

00:14:25.540 age 30.

00:14:27.880 Which makes me

00:14:28.720 wonder if there

00:14:29.320 was something

00:14:29.700 specific he said

00:14:30.780 or did

00:14:31.180 between his

00:14:32.440 ages of 25

00:14:33.340 and 30.

00:14:35.780 So,

00:14:36.400 I thought,

00:14:36.680 wow,

00:14:37.640 you know,

00:14:38.200 one Musk

00:14:39.360 commented.

00:14:39.960 He didn't even

00:14:40.400 retweet it.

00:14:40.980 He just commented

00:14:41.680 and I got

00:14:42.820 1.9 million views.

00:14:45.460 Okay.

00:14:46.360 So,

00:14:47.040 topic number two.

00:14:49.160 I think I mentioned

00:14:49.880 this yesterday.

00:14:50.500 Steve Malloy,

00:14:52.040 his Twitter name

00:14:54.440 is

00:14:54.640 at Junk Science

00:14:55.460 and he tweeted

00:14:57.660 a,

00:14:58.900 some

00:15:00.340 statistics

00:15:01.060 from the

00:15:01.760 NOAA,

00:15:03.240 the National

00:15:03.780 Organization

00:15:04.580 of

00:15:05.020 Alcoholics

00:15:06.620 Anonymous.

00:15:08.000 Now,

00:15:08.300 what is the

00:15:08.700 NOAA?

00:15:10.700 The National

00:15:11.400 Organization,

00:15:12.380 National

00:15:12.860 Oceanic

00:15:13.740 A

00:15:16.440 is

00:15:17.140 Atmospheric

00:15:17.980 Association.

00:15:22.300 Oceanic

00:15:22.820 and Atmospheric

00:15:23.480 Administration.

00:15:25.860 Exactly.

00:15:26.700 That's exactly

00:15:27.300 what I said.

00:15:28.640 Right.

00:15:28.800 Or something

00:15:30.460 like that.

00:15:31.080 Anyway,

00:15:31.480 so that

00:15:31.860 organization

00:15:32.620 put out

00:15:33.200 their

00:15:33.560 data

00:15:35.100 and it

00:15:35.580 was

00:15:36.420 interpreted

00:15:37.120 two

00:15:37.460 different

00:15:37.720 ways.

00:15:38.900 Steve

00:15:39.220 Malloy

00:15:39.560 says,

00:15:41.020 according to

00:15:41.520 the official

00:15:42.000 government

00:15:42.440 numbers,

00:15:43.800 in the

00:15:44.420 last eight

00:15:44.960 years,

00:15:45.400 the trend

00:15:45.900 has been

00:15:46.400 a decrease

00:15:47.200 in temperature.

00:15:49.480 Which,

00:15:50.120 by the way,

00:15:50.660 I don't see

00:15:51.240 anybody

00:15:51.500 questioning

00:15:52.000 the data.

00:15:53.600 In other

00:15:54.020 words,

00:15:54.380 when Steve

00:15:55.560 Malloy

00:15:55.900 looks at

00:15:56.360 it and

00:15:56.520 says,

00:15:57.280 you just

00:15:57.940 told us

00:15:58.360 that the

00:15:58.760 temperature

00:15:59.100 went down

00:15:59.580 for the

00:15:59.860 last eight

00:16:00.240 years.

00:16:01.560 And then

00:16:01.860 he shows

00:16:02.220 the graph.

00:16:03.960 I don't

00:16:04.680 believe

00:16:04.960 anybody

00:16:05.280 was

00:16:05.640 questioning

00:16:06.380 whether

00:16:06.760 he

00:16:07.080 interpreted

00:16:07.480 it

00:16:07.760 correctly.

00:16:08.460 I think

00:16:09.020 it actually

00:16:09.480 went down.

00:16:10.960 But,

00:16:11.680 does that

00:16:12.300 mean anything?

00:16:13.600 Does that

00:16:14.120 tell you

00:16:14.440 that climate

00:16:14.980 change is

00:16:15.640 over?

00:16:17.140 No.

00:16:18.160 No.

00:16:18.680 Because if

00:16:19.100 you look

00:16:19.380 at the

00:16:19.620 longer-term

00:16:20.220 graph,

00:16:21.380 there are

00:16:21.740 lots of

00:16:22.340 multi-year

00:16:22.980 periods where

00:16:23.620 it does

00:16:23.900 go down.

00:16:25.000 Followed

00:16:25.480 by going

00:16:25.980 to a

00:16:26.260 new

00:16:26.400 high.

00:16:27.660 Followed

00:16:28.180 often by

00:16:28.800 down a

00:16:29.320 few

00:16:29.480 years.

00:16:30.700 Followed

00:16:31.020 by a

00:16:31.280 new

00:16:31.380 high.

00:16:32.220 Now,

00:16:32.580 I'm not

00:16:32.880 saying that

00:16:33.280 those numbers

00:16:33.740 are necessarily

00:16:34.340 correct,

00:16:35.360 because I

00:16:35.880 don't believe

00:16:36.260 anything anymore.

00:16:37.620 But,

00:16:38.820 those are

00:16:39.320 two completely

00:16:40.380 different stories

00:16:41.300 with the same

00:16:41.920 data.

00:16:43.340 If you

00:16:43.980 pick the

00:16:44.380 most recent

00:16:45.120 eight,

00:16:46.320 do you

00:16:46.680 have an

00:16:47.000 argument that

00:16:47.600 the most

00:16:47.920 recent eight

00:16:48.580 are more

00:16:48.980 important than

00:16:49.980 the last

00:16:50.400 ones?

00:16:51.180 A little

00:16:51.500 bit.

00:16:52.780 Don't we

00:16:53.260 all just

00:16:53.660 assume that

00:16:54.160 whatever's

00:16:54.580 happening

00:16:54.840 recently is

00:16:56.240 going to be

00:16:56.520 more important

00:16:57.080 than what

00:16:57.480 happened in

00:16:57.900 the past?

00:16:59.260 Like,

00:16:59.820 yeah,

00:17:00.060 your brain

00:17:00.440 just automatically

00:17:01.080 says,

00:17:01.480 well,

00:17:01.640 yeah,

00:17:02.460 it should be

00:17:02.940 more important

00:17:03.580 than it went

00:17:04.000 down the

00:17:04.480 last eight

00:17:04.900 years while

00:17:06.120 CO2 was

00:17:07.260 going up.

00:17:08.520 That should

00:17:09.080 mean something.

00:17:10.380 And then you

00:17:10.740 look at the

00:17:11.380 way that people

00:17:12.760 don't like that

00:17:13.480 story or that

00:17:14.560 narrative,

00:17:15.460 how they twist

00:17:16.280 and turn.

00:17:17.660 People actually

00:17:18.440 said,

00:17:19.580 this proves

00:17:20.340 that our

00:17:21.800 climate

00:17:22.660 strategies are

00:17:24.120 working.

00:17:26.580 What?

00:17:27.820 There are

00:17:28.260 actually people

00:17:28.860 who are

00:17:29.140 following climate

00:17:29.920 change and

00:17:31.200 commenting in

00:17:32.600 public, and

00:17:33.580 they believe

00:17:33.980 that we would

00:17:34.500 see the

00:17:34.960 change, you

00:17:36.220 know, because

00:17:36.500 we've done

00:17:36.920 enough that's

00:17:37.560 already lowering.

00:17:39.220 Okay, maybe.

00:17:40.740 I guess anything's

00:17:42.140 possible.

00:17:43.400 But I don't

00:17:43.960 think so.

00:17:45.000 I mean, it

00:17:45.280 seems pretty

00:17:45.780 unlikely to me.

00:17:46.600 But anyway,

00:17:49.060 Elon Musk

00:17:53.180 responded to

00:17:53.960 that one as

00:17:55.160 well.

00:17:56.700 And he

00:17:58.100 said, so he

00:17:59.900 responded to

00:18:01.040 my comments

00:18:01.820 about it that

00:18:02.600 two different

00:18:05.400 things were

00:18:05.860 being presented.

00:18:07.840 It's, we

00:18:09.240 also have the

00:18:10.260 eight years

00:18:11.580 were the

00:18:11.980 warmest on

00:18:12.620 record, but

00:18:14.020 also trending

00:18:14.760 down.

00:18:15.180 So which

00:18:16.160 one do you

00:18:16.560 care about?

00:18:17.600 That it's the

00:18:18.160 warmest on

00:18:18.760 record, or

00:18:20.040 that it's

00:18:20.400 trending down?

00:18:21.300 You tell me.

00:18:21.960 Which one

00:18:22.340 should I care

00:18:22.780 about?

00:18:23.960 Which one

00:18:24.660 matters?

00:18:25.140 It's the

00:18:25.500 warmest in

00:18:26.140 record, or

00:18:27.700 it's trending

00:18:28.180 down?

00:18:28.540 trend, I

00:18:32.820 see a lot of

00:18:33.460 neither's, or

00:18:36.220 neither's, trend

00:18:38.400 both.

00:18:39.600 All right, here's

00:18:40.060 the correct

00:18:40.740 answer.

00:18:42.160 There is one

00:18:43.120 correct answer,

00:18:45.140 and there's, and

00:18:46.420 I won't take any

00:18:47.140 debate on this.

00:18:48.960 All right?

00:18:50.260 If you don't

00:18:51.140 present both of

00:18:51.960 them, you're not a

00:18:52.880 credible person.

00:18:53.600 That's the

00:18:55.860 answer.

00:18:56.520 If you don't

00:18:57.280 present both at

00:18:59.120 the same time,

00:19:00.580 don't listen to

00:19:02.380 anything else they

00:19:03.100 say.

00:19:03.920 Now, I think I'm

00:19:04.580 going to give

00:19:04.940 Steve Malloy a

00:19:06.060 pass, because he's

00:19:08.280 talking about it in

00:19:08.980 the context of the

00:19:09.980 other data, right?

00:19:10.900 So that's fair,

00:19:12.160 because the other

00:19:12.720 data's already

00:19:13.280 presented, so he

00:19:14.560 presented the part

00:19:15.400 they left out.

00:19:16.300 So that's good,

00:19:17.440 because that

00:19:17.940 incorporates the

00:19:19.200 whole.

00:19:19.400 But if anybody

00:19:20.560 tells you one of

00:19:21.440 those numbers, and

00:19:22.920 they leave out the

00:19:23.620 other one, don't

00:19:25.160 listen to anything

00:19:25.720 they ever say

00:19:26.260 again.

00:19:27.120 That's somebody who

00:19:27.780 doesn't know how to

00:19:28.440 do anything.

00:19:31.740 And by the way, I

00:19:32.640 don't know if Steve

00:19:33.640 Malloy is credible or

00:19:34.960 not credible.

00:19:35.720 I have no opinion.

00:19:36.940 I just know that he

00:19:37.940 had an interesting

00:19:38.560 point about this

00:19:39.440 particular data.

00:19:42.100 And I looked at

00:19:43.680 my numbers, and I

00:19:47.180 had millions,

00:19:47.900 millions of

00:19:49.160 views on my

00:19:50.500 tweet, and I

00:19:52.020 thought, what the

00:19:53.140 hell is going on

00:19:53.700 here?

00:19:54.880 Oh, Elon Musk

00:19:56.140 responded to that

00:19:57.160 one, too, last

00:19:58.260 night.

00:19:58.920 And he said, it's

00:19:59.860 easier to argue

00:20:00.560 that global warming

00:20:01.320 is a risk rather

00:20:03.120 than a certainty,

00:20:04.340 but it is foolish

00:20:05.760 to roll those dice,

00:20:07.300 given that we will

00:20:08.120 eventually run

00:20:08.760 out of fossil fuels

00:20:09.640 and have to

00:20:10.660 generate energy

00:20:11.540 sustainable anyway.

00:20:13.300 How many of you

00:20:14.280 would say that's

00:20:15.980 the best view?

00:20:17.580 Does that

00:20:17.920 would you

00:20:19.760 concur?

00:20:20.980 That we don't

00:20:22.080 know what the

00:20:22.840 future looks like,

00:20:24.120 but we do know

00:20:25.460 we can't use

00:20:26.980 fossil fuels

00:20:27.800 forever.

00:20:30.640 Is that a

00:20:31.920 reasonable view?

00:20:33.420 Is anything

00:20:34.100 left out?

00:20:37.320 Anything left

00:20:38.200 out?

00:20:41.140 Yes.

00:20:42.700 Because what he's

00:20:43.700 saying, I believe,

00:20:44.580 would be 100%

00:20:46.020 compatible with

00:20:46.980 everybody's view,

00:20:48.060 wouldn't it?

00:20:49.120 Is there anybody

00:20:49.860 who doesn't think,

00:20:51.560 let me say it

00:20:52.280 without the

00:20:52.860 negatives,

00:20:54.180 do you all

00:20:55.040 understand that

00:20:57.180 there's no doubt

00:20:58.020 about it,

00:20:59.040 humanity will use

00:21:00.240 different sources

00:21:00.980 of energy in the

00:21:01.900 future?

00:21:03.080 Does anybody

00:21:03.860 doubt that?

00:21:05.800 We're all 100%

00:21:07.100 certain that at

00:21:09.320 some point in the

00:21:10.320 future, we'll

00:21:11.940 probably have other

00:21:12.740 sources.

00:21:13.140 might be fusion,

00:21:14.640 might be more

00:21:15.360 standard nuclear

00:21:18.140 stuff, might be

00:21:20.400 something else,

00:21:21.160 might be electric,

00:21:22.060 might be more

00:21:22.480 wind, who knows.

00:21:23.880 But we're all

00:21:25.480 sure of that,

00:21:26.080 right?

00:21:26.400 So I would say

00:21:26.980 that what Elon Musk

00:21:27.780 said is something we

00:21:28.580 would all agree with,

00:21:30.060 right?

00:21:31.160 Is there anybody

00:21:31.900 who would disagree

00:21:32.620 with the proposition

00:21:34.720 that we're going to

00:21:36.800 run out of the

00:21:37.460 stuff we use,

00:21:38.340 so it doesn't matter

00:21:39.540 if there's climate

00:21:40.140 change or not,

00:21:40.900 we have to get

00:21:42.020 ready to develop

00:21:43.540 new sources?

00:21:44.800 Everybody?

00:21:46.860 I'm seeing some

00:21:47.760 dissenters, I'll get

00:21:48.580 to you in a moment.

00:21:49.280 All right, the

00:21:50.080 dissenters, you

00:21:50.880 already know it's a

00:21:51.580 trick, right?

00:21:52.680 You know I'm

00:21:53.400 tricking you, you

00:21:54.840 know it.

00:21:56.300 Yeah.

00:21:56.880 Here's what's left

00:21:57.840 out.

00:21:58.520 Here's the dog not

00:21:59.360 barking.

00:22:00.700 It's not about where

00:22:01.980 things are going.

00:22:03.380 We all agree that

00:22:04.580 there's not infinite

00:22:06.180 oil.

00:22:07.520 There's nobody

00:22:08.080 arguing that there

00:22:08.880 is.

00:22:09.140 The only thing

00:22:10.760 we disagree on

00:22:11.500 is the rate of

00:22:12.180 change, and he

00:22:14.140 didn't mention

00:22:14.580 that.

00:22:15.620 The rate of

00:22:16.320 change is the

00:22:16.900 only topic we

00:22:18.100 disagree on.

00:22:19.420 How aggressively,

00:22:21.340 how much of our

00:22:22.740 taxes do you put

00:22:24.500 into it because

00:22:25.180 you're trying to

00:22:25.660 make it happen

00:22:26.160 fast versus

00:22:27.700 letting the free

00:22:28.760 market do whatever

00:22:29.980 it wants, right?

00:22:31.520 So the question

00:22:32.440 was never about

00:22:34.060 whether we need

00:22:35.280 new sustainable

00:22:36.080 energy.

00:22:36.800 Everybody knew

00:22:37.420 that.

00:22:39.140 Everybody knew

00:22:39.960 we needed new

00:22:40.600 ones eventually,

00:22:41.500 whether it's 100

00:22:42.100 years from now

00:22:42.680 or 200 years

00:22:43.340 from now.

00:22:44.140 You still have

00:22:44.780 to do it.

00:22:46.060 But if you

00:22:47.360 have to do it

00:22:48.040 in 20 years,

00:22:49.900 that is an

00:22:50.600 entirely different

00:22:51.340 proposition than

00:22:52.200 you have to do

00:22:52.780 it in 300 years.

00:22:54.500 You can't compare

00:22:55.500 those two.

00:22:56.280 And to imagine

00:22:56.880 that you can

00:23:00.320 leave that out

00:23:01.120 looks a little

00:23:03.160 bit more,

00:23:04.080 a little bit

00:23:05.920 more, let's

00:23:06.880 say, persuasion

00:23:08.300 related than

00:23:09.420 data related.

00:23:12.420 Because Elon

00:23:13.220 Musk has a

00:23:14.960 business that is

00:23:16.340 very much in the

00:23:17.100 business of

00:23:17.720 alternative energy.

00:23:19.500 So of course

00:23:19.940 he would like to

00:23:22.020 do that maybe

00:23:22.880 faster than the

00:23:24.200 rest of us,

00:23:25.080 maybe, or

00:23:25.920 faster than some

00:23:26.760 of us and

00:23:27.580 slower than some

00:23:28.420 people would like

00:23:29.260 it as well.

00:23:29.660 But he does

00:23:30.660 have an

00:23:31.460 enormous

00:23:32.860 financial interest

00:23:34.740 in being a

00:23:36.040 little bit quick

00:23:36.720 about it.

00:23:37.860 Because that's

00:23:38.240 where his money

00:23:38.800 is, is being

00:23:39.400 quick about it.

00:23:40.140 Buy a Tesla

00:23:40.600 now, save the

00:23:41.880 world.

00:23:43.300 But he's not

00:23:43.940 wrong.

00:23:45.260 He's not wrong.

00:23:45.940 You just have to

00:23:46.540 consider that the

00:23:47.440 rate is the real

00:23:48.040 question.

00:23:48.760 Do you upend

00:23:49.400 everything quickly

00:23:50.220 or let it play

00:23:51.480 out?

00:23:51.760 That's really the

00:23:52.380 decision.

00:23:54.720 Well, this was

00:23:55.580 going to happen.

00:23:57.820 You know how

00:23:58.660 the Republicans

00:23:59.980 or just people

00:24:01.840 who lean right

00:24:02.680 like to say

00:24:04.040 that the

00:24:04.400 Democrats are

00:24:05.080 all groomers?

00:24:06.580 I'm sure you

00:24:07.320 have not missed

00:24:07.820 that story.

00:24:08.780 I try not to

00:24:09.940 talk about it

00:24:10.600 because it's

00:24:11.020 just achy.

00:24:11.740 It's not really

00:24:12.300 a topic.

00:24:14.220 I don't know.

00:24:14.540 It's just not

00:24:15.000 worthy of talking

00:24:15.960 about most of

00:24:16.480 the time.

00:24:17.360 But the

00:24:19.000 Democrats put

00:24:19.840 together a

00:24:20.360 compilation video

00:24:21.920 of GOP

00:24:23.340 groomers.

00:24:24.140 and it's a

00:24:26.740 pretty long

00:24:27.280 compilation video.

00:24:29.160 Now, of course,

00:24:29.980 they include

00:24:30.840 historical examples

00:24:32.120 so they can go

00:24:32.840 back a little bit.

00:24:34.220 But if you go

00:24:35.200 back a little bit,

00:24:36.120 you find a whole

00:24:36.800 bunch of people

00:24:37.460 who are

00:24:38.040 Republicans who

00:24:39.840 absolutely

00:24:40.640 were in that

00:24:42.640 groomer category,

00:24:43.800 if you will.

00:24:45.420 So,

00:24:46.460 do you know

00:24:48.280 offhand

00:24:49.040 who does

00:24:51.020 more of it?

00:24:51.680 Now, most

00:24:54.560 of the GOP

00:24:55.280 examples were

00:24:56.160 individuals who

00:24:58.200 did things and

00:24:58.940 got caught.

00:25:00.540 And they

00:25:01.020 seemed like

00:25:01.380 individual acts.

00:25:02.560 Whereas the

00:25:03.320 so-called

00:25:03.980 grooming that

00:25:05.040 is, you know,

00:25:06.080 the alleged

00:25:06.680 grooming, I'll

00:25:07.300 call it, on

00:25:08.380 the left is

00:25:09.540 industrial level.

00:25:11.700 Right?

00:25:12.640 It's not that

00:25:13.480 people on the

00:25:14.200 right are saying,

00:25:15.220 hey, there's

00:25:15.720 that one groomer

00:25:16.520 over there.

00:25:17.740 Like, sometimes

00:25:18.400 they talk about

00:25:18.980 Epstein or

00:25:19.480 something.

00:25:20.400 But mostly,

00:25:21.680 it's about

00:25:22.260 if you've

00:25:23.120 got a teacher

00:25:23.860 or somebody

00:25:25.680 who has power,

00:25:27.020 yeah, it's like

00:25:27.480 systemic grooming.

00:25:28.740 That's the

00:25:29.140 complaint.

00:25:29.660 So they're not

00:25:30.160 really comparable.

00:25:31.780 But if you

00:25:33.460 imagine that all

00:25:34.280 the groomers are

00:25:35.040 on one political

00:25:35.820 side, well,

00:25:38.600 maybe it will

00:25:39.260 change your mind

00:25:40.160 on that.

00:25:41.200 I don't think

00:25:41.880 anybody thought

00:25:42.380 that, but it's

00:25:43.500 a pretty good

00:25:43.900 play.

00:25:44.580 So just in

00:25:45.260 terms of

00:25:45.640 persuasion, I

00:25:47.220 thought the

00:25:47.580 Dems did a

00:25:48.240 good job.

00:25:48.700 it's completely

00:25:50.560 let's say

00:25:52.940 manipulative

00:25:53.680 and propaganda

00:25:55.000 and is not

00:25:56.300 based on

00:25:56.860 proper context

00:25:58.020 and all that.

00:25:59.040 So it's not

00:25:59.780 good, but

00:26:02.140 it is a

00:26:03.200 well-executed

00:26:04.140 persuasion.

00:26:05.900 It's a pretty

00:26:06.320 good Me Too

00:26:06.880 play.

00:26:07.440 Not Me Too,

00:26:08.640 what do you

00:26:08.960 call it?

00:26:09.920 You Too?

00:26:10.700 More of a

00:26:11.280 you too than

00:26:11.820 a me too.

00:26:12.360 One of my

00:26:17.820 guilty pleasures

00:26:18.640 lately is

00:26:19.340 watching

00:26:19.800 Jonathan Turley

00:26:21.420 dunking on

00:26:22.980 Adam Schiff.

00:26:24.300 If you haven't

00:26:25.020 caught any of

00:26:26.020 Jonathan Turley's

00:26:26.880 articles or

00:26:27.740 tweet threads

00:26:28.520 about Adam

00:26:30.020 Schiff, the

00:26:30.840 most storied

00:26:32.540 liar of our

00:26:34.180 day, it's

00:26:35.780 really good

00:26:36.240 stuff.

00:26:37.300 Like, just to

00:26:37.900 watch how

00:26:38.580 capably he

00:26:42.060 lays out the

00:26:43.160 case.

00:26:44.160 Turley's great.

00:26:45.320 Like, I can't

00:26:46.500 get enough of

00:26:47.120 anything he

00:26:47.640 writes.

00:26:48.360 I see a

00:26:48.880 tweet from

00:26:49.280 his, and

00:26:50.040 I'm definitely

00:26:50.840 going to read

00:26:51.200 that.

00:26:52.540 He does good

00:26:53.080 stuff.

00:26:55.700 So he points

00:26:56.620 out that the

00:26:58.380 Schiff was

00:26:59.200 publicly,

00:27:01.820 his office was

00:27:03.460 demanding all

00:27:04.140 kinds of

00:27:04.580 censorship.

00:27:06.000 At the same

00:27:06.720 time he was

00:27:07.260 lying about

00:27:07.800 stuff in

00:27:08.240 public.

00:27:08.580 So he was

00:27:10.100 lying in

00:27:10.800 public while

00:27:12.620 trying really

00:27:13.400 hard to get

00:27:14.460 the, at

00:27:15.580 least Twitter,

00:27:17.260 to suppress

00:27:19.100 his critics.

00:27:20.220 While he was

00:27:21.160 lying in

00:27:21.900 public, he

00:27:23.600 was moving

00:27:24.460 really hard,

00:27:25.300 not just like

00:27:25.880 one phone call

00:27:26.700 or something,

00:27:27.200 but a whole

00:27:28.020 program of

00:27:29.360 trying to

00:27:29.780 suppress the

00:27:30.380 people who

00:27:30.760 were calling

00:27:31.280 him out for

00:27:32.480 lying in

00:27:32.960 public.

00:27:36.080 Jenny.

00:27:38.580 stop it,

00:27:39.220 Jenny.

00:27:43.240 It's amazing.

00:27:44.960 It's just

00:27:45.400 amazing.

00:27:47.260 Yeah.

00:27:48.860 Like, to

00:27:49.460 watch Schiff

00:27:50.280 operate.

00:27:51.100 I think

00:27:51.700 Schiff is,

00:27:53.040 he is turned

00:27:53.780 into a national

00:27:54.540 asset accidentally.

00:27:56.740 Like, I think he

00:27:57.280 was just the

00:27:57.700 worst person.

00:27:58.540 Like, character

00:27:59.940 wise, I've never

00:28:00.680 seen anybody lower

00:28:01.360 character than

00:28:02.160 Adam Schiff.

00:28:03.440 But, because

00:28:04.840 he's now so

00:28:05.640 well-known as

00:28:06.420 the signal of

00:28:07.220 lying, that

00:28:08.740 whenever he gets

00:28:10.400 pushed forward

00:28:11.160 to lie for the

00:28:12.540 Democrats, you

00:28:13.660 can say to

00:28:14.080 yourself, oh,

00:28:15.480 they sent the

00:28:16.080 liar.

00:28:17.680 And whenever

00:28:18.160 there's a scandal

00:28:18.940 that's not really

00:28:19.800 anything, who

00:28:22.060 did they send?

00:28:23.160 Bernstein, to

00:28:24.620 say it's worse

00:28:25.120 than Watergate.

00:28:26.160 Right?

00:28:26.500 So if you see

00:28:27.300 Bernstein, or you

00:28:29.120 see Adam Schiff,

00:28:30.980 or you see Eric

00:28:32.000 Swalwell, the

00:28:33.780 one thing you

00:28:34.380 can know is

00:28:35.640 that honest

00:28:37.120 Democrats aren't

00:28:38.140 willing to say

00:28:38.760 those things.

00:28:40.560 Or Brennan,

00:28:41.540 right?

00:28:41.820 Brennan and

00:28:42.260 Clapper, too.

00:28:43.360 Right.

00:28:43.760 And I mean that

00:28:44.360 literally, because

00:28:45.980 there are a lot

00:28:47.100 of honest

00:28:47.660 Democrats.

00:28:49.520 Lots of

00:28:50.180 them.

00:28:51.100 The honest

00:28:51.700 ones won't go

00:28:52.360 anywhere near a

00:28:53.140 camera when

00:28:54.640 their team is

00:28:55.600 presenting a lie.

00:28:56.680 So they send

00:28:57.140 Schiff, and

00:28:57.820 you know, they're

00:28:59.080 designated liars.

00:29:00.260 So it's actually

00:29:00.880 useful now,

00:29:02.000 to know when

00:29:02.500 they're lying

00:29:03.000 because they

00:29:03.460 just tell you.

00:29:04.620 Oh, by the

00:29:05.160 way, this is

00:29:05.600 just lying.

00:29:06.880 Now, I'm

00:29:07.560 going to

00:29:07.740 disagree with

00:29:08.300 you on

00:29:08.560 Ted Lieu.

00:29:10.620 I'm more of

00:29:11.340 a Ted Lieu

00:29:12.000 fan than

00:29:13.080 you're going

00:29:13.740 to suspect.

00:29:15.040 Right?

00:29:15.280 So he and I

00:29:16.040 have had some

00:29:16.600 exchanges on

00:29:17.940 Twitter as

00:29:18.420 well.

00:29:19.420 But he's

00:29:21.280 just a

00:29:22.000 partisan.

00:29:23.440 He's just a

00:29:23.960 partisan.

00:29:25.280 He's not,

00:29:26.800 like, he's just

00:29:27.380 pushing his side,

00:29:28.380 and, you know,

00:29:28.820 he's doing it in

00:29:29.420 public.

00:29:30.680 Is he right?

00:29:31.800 No.

00:29:33.020 But is the

00:29:33.620 other team right

00:29:34.280 all the time?

00:29:35.020 No.

00:29:36.460 I just don't see

00:29:37.500 him anywhere near

00:29:38.760 the Schiff and

00:29:41.360 Swalwell level.

00:29:42.620 He just seems

00:29:43.180 like a

00:29:43.480 partisan.

00:29:46.460 Gates was on

00:29:47.300 Timcast last

00:29:48.080 night.

00:29:48.540 Somebody says

00:29:49.020 that was fire.

00:29:50.840 Yeah.

00:29:51.080 I like Ted

00:29:51.580 Lieu.

00:29:52.120 I don't know.

00:29:52.600 I feel like I

00:29:53.220 could hang with

00:29:53.760 him.

00:29:54.340 He just seems

00:29:54.760 like he'd be a

00:29:55.280 fun guy.

00:29:55.660 I tend to

00:29:58.000 like anybody

00:29:58.420 who's got a

00:29:58.800 sense of

00:29:59.180 humor.

00:30:01.460 Just sort of,

00:30:02.820 you know, a

00:30:03.280 general statement.

00:30:05.920 All right.

00:30:06.420 Carrie Lake

00:30:07.240 is still, I

00:30:09.380 guess she had

00:30:09.780 some court

00:30:11.080 success in

00:30:12.080 pressing her

00:30:13.440 case, so

00:30:14.080 basically she

00:30:14.960 just gets the

00:30:16.240 chance to

00:30:16.720 press her

00:30:17.180 case.

00:30:18.360 And two

00:30:19.280 of the things

00:30:19.740 that she's

00:30:20.140 claiming about

00:30:20.800 the Arizona

00:30:21.560 election that

00:30:22.840 she thinks

00:30:23.300 were illegitimate

00:30:24.720 are that 300,000

00:30:26.300 or more

00:30:26.900 ballots did

00:30:28.180 not have a

00:30:28.800 proper chain

00:30:29.400 of custody.

00:30:31.280 And number

00:30:31.880 two, over

00:30:33.000 100,000 ballots

00:30:33.960 with faulty

00:30:34.520 signature

00:30:35.040 verification got

00:30:38.080 through.

00:30:38.920 So the

00:30:39.480 Arizona law

00:30:40.200 says that

00:30:40.780 they must be

00:30:41.760 verified, but

00:30:43.200 her claim is

00:30:43.980 that over

00:30:45.040 100,000 were

00:30:45.820 not.

00:30:46.740 Now, here's

00:30:47.680 my problem.

00:30:48.260 here's my

00:30:54.580 problem.

00:30:57.640 How would a

00:30:58.680 court ever

00:30:59.240 act on that?

00:31:00.240 I don't even

00:31:00.700 see how a

00:31:01.240 court would do

00:31:01.720 anything.

00:31:02.420 Because isn't

00:31:03.380 the court going

00:31:03.920 to say, yeah,

00:31:05.520 yep, good

00:31:06.480 points.

00:31:07.600 Arizona didn't

00:31:08.540 do a good job

00:31:09.380 of following

00:31:09.880 their own

00:31:10.280 procedures.

00:31:13.040 Thanks for

00:31:13.660 telling me.

00:31:14.080 I think the

00:31:17.760 Constitution just

00:31:18.660 says it's up to

00:31:19.340 the states.

00:31:20.340 I don't believe

00:31:21.300 the Constitution

00:31:21.880 says the states

00:31:22.880 must operate

00:31:23.580 perfectly, according

00:31:25.300 to you, or it

00:31:26.900 doesn't count.

00:31:28.540 Now, it would be

00:31:29.240 different if there

00:31:30.080 were direct

00:31:30.960 evidence of a

00:31:31.680 crime.

00:31:32.760 But if the only

00:31:33.780 problem is that

00:31:35.000 there was the

00:31:35.960 potential for

00:31:36.740 rigging, not

00:31:38.240 direct evidence,

00:31:39.160 but just potential

00:31:40.020 for rigging, what

00:31:41.680 does the court do

00:31:42.300 about that?

00:31:42.840 doesn't the

00:31:46.280 court just say,

00:31:47.540 well, you

00:31:48.580 know, get a

00:31:49.220 better state.

00:31:50.340 It's up to the

00:31:51.020 state.

00:31:51.540 If the state

00:31:53.620 did not give

00:31:54.740 you the

00:31:55.200 transparency you

00:31:56.260 wanted, maybe

00:31:58.320 you should talk

00:31:58.960 to the state.

00:32:01.600 Orders of

00:32:02.260 full audit?

00:32:03.600 I don't know.

00:32:04.480 I can't see

00:32:05.580 them decertifying

00:32:06.600 a governor race

00:32:08.860 at this point.

00:32:10.580 So, yeah,

00:32:10.980 here's the

00:32:11.640 thing.

00:32:11.840 If you're

00:32:13.220 making a

00:32:14.200 strict technical

00:32:15.440 argument, then

00:32:17.220 maybe you can

00:32:17.780 make a case that

00:32:18.580 the court could

00:32:19.320 do something on

00:32:20.080 a strictly

00:32:20.620 technical argument.

00:32:22.460 But I don't

00:32:23.080 think the courts

00:32:23.620 act that way when

00:32:24.600 it comes to

00:32:25.060 elections.

00:32:26.000 I think the

00:32:26.700 courts will

00:32:27.240 always favor

00:32:28.400 stability of

00:32:30.300 the system.

00:32:32.360 And so the

00:32:32.920 court, knowing

00:32:33.760 that if they

00:32:34.400 act, let's say

00:32:35.280 overthrowing

00:32:35.860 election, it

00:32:36.880 would create

00:32:37.920 instability in the

00:32:39.220 system, I don't

00:32:40.300 think they'll

00:32:40.660 act.

00:32:41.920 I think the

00:32:42.660 court is going

00:32:43.280 to say, yeah,

00:32:44.220 that looks pretty

00:32:44.840 sketchy, but you

00:32:46.520 work it out.

00:32:47.440 It's better if you

00:32:48.160 work it out than we

00:32:48.980 work it out.

00:32:49.780 I think that's

00:32:50.280 where it's going.

00:32:51.360 Now, that doesn't

00:32:52.240 mean she shouldn't

00:32:52.900 press the case.

00:32:54.600 Because I love the

00:32:55.700 fact that she's

00:32:56.540 highlighting, you

00:32:58.120 know, two

00:32:58.640 vulnerabilities in

00:32:59.600 her system that

00:33:00.220 probably are common

00:33:01.100 to other states,

00:33:02.620 and maybe everybody

00:33:03.580 should be looking

00:33:04.100 into it.

00:33:04.520 So it's a good,

00:33:06.500 solid, you know,

00:33:08.500 patriotic thing, and

00:33:11.000 I think we should

00:33:11.660 all be, even if

00:33:13.340 you disagree with,

00:33:14.860 you know, her

00:33:15.320 case, you should

00:33:16.880 all be happy she's

00:33:17.700 fighting it.

00:33:18.940 This is exactly the

00:33:20.140 kind of fight that

00:33:21.560 you want to maybe

00:33:23.200 get some more

00:33:23.680 transparency in your

00:33:24.560 system, make people

00:33:25.860 a little bit more

00:33:26.460 alert where the

00:33:27.320 problems are.

00:33:28.400 It's all good.

00:33:29.460 No matter how this

00:33:30.260 ends, Carrie Lake

00:33:31.280 is fighting a good

00:33:32.480 fight.

00:33:32.780 So I think we're

00:33:33.420 going to come out

00:33:33.880 ahead one way or

00:33:35.160 another.

00:33:35.520 I don't think

00:33:35.920 she's going to

00:33:36.380 win, but I think

00:33:37.540 we'll come out

00:33:38.580 ahead.

00:33:41.260 Did you see the

00:33:42.220 new, is it the

00:33:46.160 CDC who's saying

00:33:47.040 it, that the new

00:33:48.140 variant of the

00:33:48.900 virus is more

00:33:50.320 likely to hit the

00:33:51.880 vaccinated and

00:33:53.120 already infected?

00:33:55.400 Do you believe

00:33:56.160 that?

00:33:58.520 It's the and

00:33:59.840 already infected.

00:34:01.380 Do you believe

00:34:02.020 that there's a

00:34:02.600 variant that is

00:34:04.160 more likely to

00:34:05.360 infect you if

00:34:07.100 you'd already

00:34:07.840 been infected

00:34:08.560 with a variant

00:34:09.840 of that variant?

00:34:12.240 Is that, is that

00:34:13.960 passing your

00:34:14.620 sniff test?

00:34:16.600 Now, the problem

00:34:18.200 is that I don't

00:34:18.880 see a mechanism,

00:34:20.280 right?

00:34:20.500 There's no

00:34:20.940 proposed mechanism

00:34:21.880 for why that could

00:34:22.640 be the case.

00:34:23.600 But with the

00:34:24.460 vaccinations, there

00:34:27.440 are smart people

00:34:28.360 who propose a

00:34:29.940 potential mechanism,

00:34:31.480 mechanism by which

00:34:32.940 they could cause

00:34:33.580 harm to some

00:34:34.200 people.

00:34:35.040 That's a well

00:34:36.040 described mechanism.

00:34:37.480 But having a

00:34:38.880 prior infection,

00:34:40.720 everything we know

00:34:42.100 about that says

00:34:42.820 that should make you

00:34:43.520 stronger against

00:34:45.000 anything related to

00:34:46.180 it, or at least

00:34:47.520 the same, under no

00:34:49.840 case have we ever

00:34:50.800 seen, correct me if

00:34:52.060 I'm wrong, but does

00:34:53.660 it make sense you'd

00:34:54.360 ever be weaker?

00:34:55.920 Weaker in that

00:34:56.700 specific way?

00:34:58.740 I don't know.

00:35:00.180 Well, let me ask

00:35:01.860 you this.

00:35:04.180 I sometimes go

00:35:06.360 entire days without

00:35:07.940 human contact.

00:35:09.820 Like, actually none.

00:35:11.980 Yeah, like one day

00:35:12.700 this week I talked to

00:35:13.800 no people in person.

00:35:15.680 Except I guess I

00:35:16.720 ordered something at

00:35:17.540 Starbucks.

00:35:18.600 That was as close as

00:35:19.740 I got to human

00:35:20.340 contact.

00:35:20.700 Now, would a

00:35:23.860 person like me, who

00:35:25.820 can, I can socially

00:35:28.020 isolate better than

00:35:29.200 almost anybody, would

00:35:30.900 a person like me be

00:35:31.800 inclined to get, like,

00:35:33.220 booster after booster?

00:35:35.200 Less likely.

00:35:36.380 Now, there are other

00:35:37.200 reasons, right?

00:35:38.040 That's not the only

00:35:38.640 reason, but much less

00:35:39.780 likely.

00:35:40.560 Now, suppose I had a

00:35:41.640 job where I was going

00:35:43.320 to be around people,

00:35:44.480 like, hordes of people

00:35:45.980 all the time.

00:35:47.740 Would I be more likely

00:35:49.240 to have been boosted?

00:35:50.900 Now, again, at my

00:35:51.720 age, right?

00:35:52.320 We're not talking

00:35:52.860 about younger people.

00:35:53.740 That's a whole

00:35:54.060 different calculation.

00:35:55.400 But at my age, would

00:35:57.240 I be more likely to

00:35:58.420 be boosted if I knew

00:35:59.500 I was just going to

00:35:59.960 be surrounded by

00:36:00.980 possibly infected

00:36:02.500 people all the time?

00:36:03.720 I think so.

00:36:04.960 I think so.

00:36:05.880 I think that I would

00:36:07.040 be more likely to

00:36:07.900 boost because I would

00:36:09.380 talk myself into that

00:36:10.560 being a danger.

00:36:12.360 So, how do we

00:36:13.660 know that the

00:36:15.560 people who have the

00:36:16.540 most obvious chance

00:36:18.580 of getting infected

00:36:19.440 aren't the ones

00:36:20.760 who quite reasonably

00:36:21.660 are more likely to

00:36:22.720 be vaccinated and

00:36:23.600 boosted?

00:36:25.200 Wouldn't you expect

00:36:27.040 that the more

00:36:28.600 boosted you are,

00:36:29.400 the more likely

00:36:29.920 you would get

00:36:30.320 infected?

00:36:31.620 That's what I'd

00:36:32.380 expect.

00:36:35.260 But I'm not sure

00:36:36.520 that that works

00:36:37.400 for natural immunity.

00:36:39.240 Does it feel to you

00:36:40.540 like they might have

00:36:41.320 thrown in the natural

00:36:42.320 immunity part so you

00:36:44.260 wouldn't suspect it's

00:36:45.180 the vaccinations?

00:36:45.860 Doesn't it feel like

00:36:48.500 that's what they did?

00:36:49.920 It's like, really?

00:36:51.360 Because one of them

00:36:52.040 has a described

00:36:53.000 mechanism and the

00:36:55.580 other one's never

00:36:56.300 happened.

00:36:59.720 It feels like a

00:37:00.780 little sketchy that

00:37:01.820 they put them in the

00:37:02.580 same sentence.

00:37:03.680 You know, if you

00:37:05.360 got vaccinated or

00:37:07.300 natural immunity,

00:37:09.400 I'm not buying any of

00:37:11.600 that.

00:37:11.800 Now, to his credit,

00:37:14.740 do you know what

00:37:15.180 Fauci said about it?

00:37:17.140 Fauci said the data

00:37:18.120 might be bullshit.

00:37:20.860 Okay.

00:37:21.900 I'm going to give him

00:37:22.820 that.

00:37:24.220 I'm going to give him

00:37:25.440 that.

00:37:26.220 He actually said the

00:37:27.040 data might be wrong.

00:37:28.060 Because apparently it's

00:37:29.040 something that our

00:37:30.720 data is showing, but

00:37:31.700 other countries are not

00:37:32.700 buying into this

00:37:33.440 analysis.

00:37:35.320 Right?

00:37:35.880 So there's something

00:37:36.740 sketchy about the

00:37:37.600 whole thing.

00:37:38.680 Either the data is

00:37:39.540 wrong, or if the data

00:37:40.940 is right, they're

00:37:41.720 lying to us, maybe by

00:37:43.620 throwing in the

00:37:44.240 natural immunity

00:37:44.900 people.

00:37:45.760 I mean, to me, this

00:37:46.460 screams bad data, or

00:37:48.020 bad analysis.

00:37:49.520 I don't know.

00:37:50.720 I mean, we could be

00:37:51.720 wrong.

00:37:53.380 I'll put everything in

00:37:54.260 a statistical frame,

00:37:57.320 not a yes or no.

00:37:59.500 But certainly sketchy

00:38:00.760 looking.

00:38:05.560 All right.

00:38:06.500 Here's where I want

00:38:07.800 to get the clot

00:38:09.160 Burtz all clicking

00:38:11.260 away.

00:38:12.000 Click, click, click,

00:38:12.560 click, click, click.

00:38:13.440 Clop Burtz.

00:38:15.460 I'm going to say

00:38:16.220 something that will

00:38:17.260 make you mistakenly

00:38:18.700 believe that I have a

00:38:20.740 different opinion than

00:38:21.540 I do.

00:38:22.480 Now, the rest of you

00:38:23.340 will completely be on

00:38:24.760 board, and it'll be

00:38:25.500 easy to understand.

00:38:26.640 But the clot Burtz are

00:38:27.820 just binary.

00:38:28.640 It's like, loves this,

00:38:29.900 hates this.

00:38:30.820 Wait, wait, wait.

00:38:31.360 You said something

00:38:31.900 about this?

00:38:32.300 You must hate it.

00:38:33.440 All right.

00:38:34.360 So the rest of you

00:38:35.360 will be fine.

00:38:35.900 It goes like this.

00:38:39.620 I'm going to give you

00:38:40.220 a little wind-up here.

00:38:42.840 There's one thing that

00:38:43.980 artists add to the

00:38:46.120 system that sometimes

00:38:47.800 scientists and engineers

00:38:49.260 and lawyers will miss.

00:38:51.700 What is it?

00:38:53.100 What is it that artists

00:38:54.400 will sometimes see that

00:38:57.060 engineers and scientists

00:38:58.600 and other people don't

00:39:01.280 see?

00:39:02.820 Now, not feelings.

00:39:05.180 Maybe that's true,

00:39:06.220 but that's not where

00:39:06.760 I'm going.

00:39:07.460 I'm not going for the

00:39:08.260 feelings part.

00:39:11.360 I just want to, not

00:39:12.660 nuance.

00:39:14.100 No, there's something

00:39:15.000 really big that artists

00:39:17.500 see that other people

00:39:19.060 don't even look for.

00:39:20.580 In other words, we're

00:39:21.380 actually actively looking

00:39:22.660 for something that

00:39:24.220 nobody else looks for.

00:39:26.580 Ooh.

00:39:27.560 A little connection

00:39:28.360 problem there.

00:39:30.120 All right.

00:39:30.520 Here's the answer.

00:39:31.280 Empty space.

00:39:35.440 Empty space.

00:39:37.300 If I'm going to design,

00:39:39.860 let's say, a graphic art,

00:39:42.020 if I'm going to design

00:39:45.200 something, I will look

00:39:47.040 for where I put stuff

00:39:48.200 in the picture, but I'll

00:39:49.640 make sure that there's a

00:39:50.540 big empty space, a

00:39:52.240 negative space, because

00:39:53.600 that's what makes the

00:39:54.620 composition work.

00:39:56.300 It's the, not just

00:39:57.360 where you put stuff,

00:39:58.900 it's where you decide to

00:39:59.880 not put stuff.

00:40:01.280 So I actively look for

00:40:03.420 the missing parts.

00:40:05.120 I often talk about the

00:40:06.180 dog not barking.

00:40:08.300 I believe I've just

00:40:09.600 trained my brain to look

00:40:10.860 for the part that's

00:40:11.640 missing, because humor

00:40:13.060 does that too.

00:40:14.100 If I'm looking at a

00:40:15.060 situation and I want to

00:40:16.260 find the joke, I don't

00:40:18.320 say what's there, I say

00:40:20.560 what's missing, as well

00:40:22.240 as what's there.

00:40:22.800 So I'm always actively

00:40:24.600 looking for what's

00:40:25.480 missing.

00:40:26.620 Now, we have this big

00:40:28.420 conversation about

00:40:29.180 excess mortality.

00:40:30.920 Some say it might be

00:40:32.680 COVID.

00:40:33.780 Some say it might be the

00:40:36.280 vaccination.

00:40:38.080 What does the artist say?

00:40:39.140 What if there's a third

00:40:45.880 mass killer and it's

00:40:48.460 invisible to us because

00:40:50.700 we're focused on the

00:40:51.900 other two things, the

00:40:53.100 COVID and the vax?

00:40:54.900 Now, of course, we think

00:40:56.700 there's some disruption

00:40:57.920 from the shutdowns

00:40:59.660 themselves.

00:41:00.640 You know, there's some

00:41:01.140 delayed medical things and

00:41:02.440 everything.

00:41:03.420 But do all of those

00:41:05.880 explanations feel like

00:41:07.120 they're capturing the

00:41:08.580 amount of death that we

00:41:09.740 might be experiencing?

00:41:11.680 Does it feel like there

00:41:12.740 might be something else?

00:41:15.020 And if there were, if it

00:41:17.180 were fentanyl, we'd

00:41:17.940 probably have noticed it

00:41:18.760 by now.

00:41:19.500 So that is something

00:41:20.520 else.

00:41:21.080 But I'm going to give

00:41:23.380 you a hypothesis that I

00:41:25.640 don't present as, you

00:41:27.720 know, like a conclusion.

00:41:28.920 So I'm not going to say

00:41:29.620 this is for sure.

00:41:31.080 I'm going to give you

00:41:32.040 a hypothesis that

00:41:34.740 there's something really

00:41:35.740 big and really obvious

00:41:37.700 that's killing people,

00:41:39.620 maybe not instead of

00:41:41.540 vaccinations or COVID,

00:41:44.360 but on top of, on top

00:41:46.780 of.

00:41:47.400 So here's where the

00:41:48.700 cloppers will get

00:41:49.540 confused.

00:41:51.080 It's a fact that

00:41:53.000 vaccinations kill some

00:41:54.360 people.

00:41:55.680 We just don't know what

00:41:56.820 the percentage is.

00:41:58.020 Like, even the people who

00:41:58.980 are the most pro-vaccination

00:42:01.180 understand that we're all

00:42:03.360 built differently and some

00:42:04.440 people are going to die.

00:42:05.720 It's like true of a lot of

00:42:06.640 medications.

00:42:07.960 So there's not a question

00:42:09.440 about whether the

00:42:10.340 vaccinations are adding to

00:42:12.460 excess mortality or, you

00:42:15.140 know, that as well as the

00:42:16.660 COVID itself.

00:42:18.100 But what if, what if there

00:42:20.600 were a third mass killer?

00:42:23.400 Would you know it?

00:42:25.500 Let me ask you the first

00:42:26.640 question.

00:42:26.940 If, if there were something

00:42:28.580 else going on, would you

00:42:30.260 buy the, the, the first

00:42:32.500 assertion that we wouldn't

00:42:36.420 notice?

00:42:37.280 We wouldn't notice, right?

00:42:40.540 Now, here's my question.

00:42:42.240 What else changed at about

00:42:44.420 the same time as the

00:42:45.600 vaccinations were rolled

00:42:46.680 down?

00:42:47.480 If it's the only thing that

00:42:48.700 really changed, then I think,

00:42:51.380 you know, then it probably

00:42:53.340 makes perfect sense to focus

00:42:54.880 on it.

00:42:55.300 If it's the only thing that

00:42:56.280 changed.

00:42:57.400 But is it?

00:42:58.640 Is it the only thing that

00:42:59.720 changed?

00:43:01.440 I don't know.

00:43:03.140 Did you know that stress can

00:43:06.440 cause cardiac arrest?

00:43:10.720 Did you all know that an

00:43:12.080 increase in stress kills you?

00:43:15.480 I mean, not every person, but

00:43:16.800 statistically.

00:43:17.980 All right.

00:43:20.020 Let me take you back to 1970.

00:43:23.240 You're going to love where this

00:43:24.220 is going.

00:43:25.880 1970.

00:43:28.720 I was alive then.

00:43:30.940 You know, a young person.

00:43:32.440 Let's say I had a stressful day.

00:43:35.560 Oh, a bunch of stress.

00:43:37.360 And then I wanted to recover

00:43:39.300 from the stress.

00:43:40.520 What did I do to recover from

00:43:42.180 the stress?

00:43:43.680 Well, I'd usually just sit around

00:43:45.300 bored or I'd like pick the

00:43:48.360 bark off a stick or I'd sit on

00:43:50.900 a wall and wait for a car to go

00:43:52.600 by.

00:43:54.440 Or as a healthful person said,

00:43:57.200 I'd beat off.

00:43:58.820 I would go for a walk.

00:44:00.240 I'd play some sports.

00:44:02.520 Right?

00:44:03.140 And if I did any of those

00:44:04.660 things, my cortisol levels and

00:44:07.500 my adrenaline would go down.

00:44:09.960 I'd get back into a healthy mode

00:44:11.420 for a while.

00:44:11.860 But then later, you know,

00:44:13.660 some stressful thing would

00:44:14.680 happen.

00:44:15.780 So I'd be peaking and

00:44:18.020 valleying all day long.

00:44:19.440 Right?

00:44:19.640 Peaking and valleying.

00:44:21.040 Now, one assumes,

00:44:22.460 one assumes that the low points

00:44:27.560 are where you regain your health.

00:44:31.020 Imagine if you never got to

00:44:32.600 relax.

00:44:34.280 What if you had high stress

00:44:35.920 followed by more stress,

00:44:39.240 followed by more stress and

00:44:41.760 it never stopped?

00:44:44.300 All right.

00:44:44.860 What do you do in 2023

00:44:46.500 after a stressful situation?

00:44:49.960 So you feel stressed.

00:44:52.500 What do you do?

00:44:53.860 I'll tell you what I do.

00:44:55.860 Check my phone.

00:44:57.780 Check my phone.

00:44:59.380 So I'll be up in like high

00:45:00.640 stress area and I'll check my

00:45:02.160 phone.

00:45:03.180 And then my stress goes up a

00:45:05.980 little bit.

00:45:06.360 And then I got to go do

00:45:09.460 something else.

00:45:10.080 I can't play on my phone all

00:45:11.060 day.

00:45:11.440 So I go off to a stressful

00:45:13.380 situation and I stay there.

00:45:15.980 But now I've got a break.

00:45:18.000 I've got a break.

00:45:19.320 So I pick out my phone and I

00:45:21.060 look at Twitter and I'm like,

00:45:22.040 ah!

00:45:23.160 And my stress stays the same.

00:45:26.680 If I simply describe that

00:45:28.460 situation to you and then I

00:45:30.960 add on top of it something we

00:45:32.480 know for sure.

00:45:33.800 One thing we know for sure is

00:45:35.600 that all change causes

00:45:37.820 stress.

00:45:39.480 If you get married, it's

00:45:40.900 stressful.

00:45:41.320 If you get divorced, if you

00:45:42.440 change jobs, if you get a

00:45:44.080 promotion, it's stressful.

00:45:45.220 If you get fired, it's

00:45:46.200 stressful.

00:45:47.020 If the weather changes, it's

00:45:48.580 stressful.

00:45:49.580 If your finances change, it's

00:45:51.040 stressful.

00:45:51.660 If your relationships, you

00:45:52.780 know, everything.

00:45:54.160 Every change.

00:45:55.420 What is a bigger change than

00:45:57.740 the pandemic in your life?

00:46:00.880 For me, nothing.

00:46:02.780 That was it.

00:46:03.700 The pandemic was the biggest

00:46:05.620 stressor of my life.

00:46:07.640 How many of you would agree?

00:46:09.540 The biggest stressor that's not

00:46:10.940 part of your actual personal

00:46:12.360 experience, but, you know, the

00:46:13.740 external stressor.

00:46:16.800 Now, if you went to war, that'd be

00:46:18.540 worse.

00:46:19.580 But in my lifetime, I haven't

00:46:21.880 gone to war.

00:46:22.760 So, I asked on Twitter, I did a

00:46:27.880 little, you know, non-scientific

00:46:29.500 poll, and I said, rank your stress,

00:46:32.420 you know, before the pandemic

00:46:33.740 compared to, you know, during and

00:46:35.980 after.

00:46:37.420 And 31% said it's about the same,

00:46:40.960 stress level's about the same.

00:46:43.560 28% say it's a bit higher now than

00:46:46.360 before the pandemic.

00:46:47.140 And 24% say it's much higher.

00:46:50.820 Much higher.

00:46:53.740 And 17% say it's actually less

00:46:55.880 stress.

00:46:56.680 Now, the way I asked the question

00:46:58.960 was a problem, and, you know, it's a

00:47:01.760 non-scientific poll, so don't put too

00:47:03.740 much credibility into it.

00:47:05.120 But the way I asked the question, and

00:47:06.860 I could tell from the comments, people

00:47:09.080 thought that when I said stress, that

00:47:11.860 what I really meant was, do you trust

00:47:13.760 the so-called vaccination or not?

00:47:17.020 And that wasn't the question.

00:47:18.440 So, we're so primed to see it as

00:47:22.100 anti-vax or pro-vax that I asked about

00:47:25.200 people's stress in general, and they

00:47:27.620 answered it like I was asking about

00:47:29.160 vaccinations, which, you know, was a

00:47:32.660 small part of the whole.

00:47:34.640 So, people can't even answer a simple

00:47:36.840 poll in 2023 without thinking it's

00:47:40.260 about vaccinations.

00:47:41.080 Like, we're just so primed for war,

00:47:44.700 yes or no, conflict.

00:47:47.300 So, now imagine that we were in a

00:47:53.620 period in America where we had the

00:47:55.440 lowest level of trust in our leaders,

00:47:59.560 and that at the same time, we had the

00:48:02.300 biggest challenge they've ever had.

00:48:04.640 You know, maybe World War II was

00:48:05.840 bigger, but in, you know, in my

00:48:07.840 lifetime.

00:48:08.620 The pandemic was the biggest

00:48:09.720 leadership challenge.

00:48:11.280 So, imagine not trusting your own

00:48:13.140 leaders before the pandemic even

00:48:15.220 started.

00:48:16.540 And then you've got a pandemic, and

00:48:19.080 then all the leaders and the experts

00:48:20.520 start looking like maybe they're not

00:48:22.120 on your side so much.

00:48:23.440 It looks like a money grab.

00:48:25.500 And the, you know, the data and the

00:48:27.040 fog of war, you don't trust your data.

00:48:29.340 How stressful would it be to have one

00:48:31.960 of the biggest challenges at the same

00:48:34.280 time that you think the people in

00:48:35.600 charge of it are lying to you and

00:48:38.160 incompetent and maybe corrupt?

00:48:41.400 I can't even imagine anything more

00:48:42.940 stressful than that, you know, short of

00:48:44.380 war.

00:48:45.180 You know, let me be clear.

00:48:48.340 The Ukrainians have it a lot worse.

00:48:50.740 All right?

00:48:51.540 Just put that out there.

00:48:52.600 We're not comparing it to war.

00:48:55.340 But in terms of just ordinary life

00:48:57.320 stress, I don't think it's ever been

00:48:59.520 higher.

00:48:59.800 If I had told you, I'm going to take

00:49:04.440 25% of your public, and I'm going to

00:49:08.460 make them more stressed than they've

00:49:10.380 ever been in their life, do you get

00:49:13.220 more heart attacks?

00:49:15.440 Yes or no?

00:49:17.120 Do you get more heart attacks if I take

00:49:19.800 25% of the public and stress them beyond

00:49:22.080 what they've ever been stressed?

00:49:25.120 I think so.

00:49:26.500 Now, I'm not sure if that would

00:49:27.980 necessarily have athletes falling

00:49:30.540 over.

00:49:31.320 Do you?

00:49:32.000 I don't know that that would make

00:49:33.420 athletes start falling over in bigger

00:49:35.180 numbers.

00:49:35.960 Like, I kind of expect that would

00:49:37.340 affect people my age, you know, not

00:49:39.920 elite athletes.

00:49:41.540 But let me give you another hypothesis.

00:49:44.380 Do you think there's anything that

00:49:45.940 elite athletes imbibe that's different

00:49:50.300 from what you imbibe?

00:49:52.860 Probably.

00:49:54.160 Probably.

00:49:55.400 Because, you know, they would

00:49:56.480 supplement, they would, you know, maybe

00:49:58.560 some would cheat.

00:50:00.720 You know, maybe some performance

00:50:02.700 enhancing things, right?

00:50:04.920 What if there was one popular form

00:50:08.900 of, let's say, athletic performance

00:50:11.760 enhancing thing that a lot of people

00:50:14.260 were using and there was a bad batch?

00:50:17.620 Would you ever stop to think that there

00:50:21.820 was any problem but the vaccinations

00:50:23.480 is killing people?

00:50:24.900 You would not.

00:50:26.360 You would assume it was the

00:50:27.680 vaccinations.

00:50:28.940 And it might be.

00:50:30.060 So here's the part I have to say for

00:50:31.840 the clopberts.

00:50:33.540 Clopberts, I'm not saying that the

00:50:36.740 vaccinations are safe.

00:50:39.880 I'm saying I don't know how dangerous

00:50:42.080 they are.

00:50:42.820 But I'm also saying that if you assume

00:50:45.560 it's the only thing that would be

00:50:47.220 killing people, at the same time a lot

00:50:49.620 of things are changing.

00:50:50.480 There are a lot of other things

00:50:52.560 that are changing.

00:50:53.880 And I worry that it's like a

00:50:55.640 magician's trick.

00:50:57.340 We're watching the magician's two

00:50:59.180 hands.

00:51:00.300 You're like, oh, watch his left hand.

00:51:01.960 That's the vaccination one.

00:51:03.600 Watch his right hand.

00:51:04.480 That's the anti-vaccination one.

00:51:06.180 But this guy's only got two hands.

00:51:08.020 So if we watch those two hands,

00:51:09.580 we'll see the trick.

00:51:10.860 And while you're watching the

00:51:11.820 magician's two hands, the magician's

00:51:14.700 assistant is doing the trick.

00:51:16.900 Because you're looking in the wrong

00:51:20.040 place.

00:51:20.900 So here's the only thing I'm going to

00:51:22.600 add with certainty.

00:51:24.640 Everything else is just speculative.

00:51:26.740 But with certainty, we are blind to

00:51:30.000 any third killer.

00:51:32.800 I don't know that there is one.

00:51:39.880 Jenny says, Scott, apologize for

00:51:43.740 begging the government for mass

00:51:45.100 testing for two years.

00:51:46.700 No, we needed mass rapid testing.

00:51:49.900 That would have helped a lot.

00:51:52.140 Anybody who thinks that wouldn't

00:51:53.440 have helped?

00:51:55.100 Because the mass rapid testing would

00:51:56.900 help you make your own individual

00:51:58.260 decisions.

00:51:59.440 Are you opposed to people making

00:52:00.940 their individual health decisions

00:52:02.440 with data?

00:52:04.620 That's just a silly thing to be

00:52:05.900 against.

00:52:08.580 And by the way, the only reason we

00:52:10.140 didn't have them had to be

00:52:11.160 corruption.

00:52:11.520 All right.

00:52:14.260 So, have I made my point, have I

00:52:17.980 made my point that if there's a

00:52:20.360 third killer, there totally could

00:52:22.580 be, and we would be blind to it.

00:52:25.860 We would be blind to it.

00:52:29.080 Okay, that's all.

00:52:30.360 Yeah, I'm not going to state that

00:52:31.420 those are killing people, just that

00:52:32.740 we would be blind to it.

00:52:33.940 But I will state that the extra

00:52:35.340 stress is guaranteed to cause more

00:52:37.580 heart attacks.

00:52:38.120 How about that?

00:52:40.940 We don't know if that's what we're

00:52:42.480 seeing, but would you say with a

00:52:44.920 large population, if you

00:52:46.940 substantially increase their

00:52:48.520 stress, more heart attacks?

00:52:53.940 The part that, and again, I'll say

00:52:56.100 it again, but not necessarily the

00:52:58.880 athletes.

00:53:01.120 The athletes dying looks like it

00:53:02.900 could be, there could be a fourth

00:53:04.400 killer, right?

00:53:05.440 We could have four things killing

00:53:07.560 people, and only be seeing two,

00:53:10.400 because we're just tuned to those

00:53:12.180 two.

00:53:14.080 All right, here's the question I

00:53:15.200 asked.

00:53:16.280 If an evil hypnotist took control of

00:53:19.860 TikTok's algorithm, could they use it

00:53:23.100 to murder people in a demographic?

00:53:26.620 Now, not murder a specific person,

00:53:29.300 although it could probably do that.

00:53:30.540 But I'll say, could it murder lots of

00:53:34.480 people you don't know which ones, just

00:53:36.380 yes, absolutely.

00:53:40.140 If you gave me control of TikTok's

00:53:42.860 algorithm and said, here's who we want

00:53:45.880 you to target.

00:53:47.320 We want you to increase the death rate

00:53:49.520 in this group of people.

00:53:51.780 You don't think I could do that?

00:53:53.360 If I had control of the algorithm, and

00:53:56.460 I could say these people are going to

00:53:57.800 see this content?

00:53:58.600 Oh, I could do that.

00:54:01.780 Yeah, I could do mass murder, and it

00:54:05.060 wouldn't even be hard.

00:54:06.840 Like, you know, I'm not like the

00:54:09.260 super hypnotist or anything.

00:54:10.800 It would just be basic, pretty basic,

00:54:13.880 for somebody who had just ordinary

00:54:16.680 persuasion skills, if they were evil,

00:54:19.420 and if they had full control of the

00:54:21.020 algorithm.

00:54:22.160 Now, how lucky are we that China

00:54:27.400 hasn't figured that out, huh?

00:54:29.220 Huh?

00:54:30.020 How lucky are we that, you know, a

00:54:32.820 podcaster here in the United States

00:54:34.660 can easily see it?

00:54:36.680 Easily see it.

00:54:37.760 Very obvious.

00:54:38.740 And all of you, as soon as I said it,

00:54:41.160 said, well, you know, it is obvious.

00:54:44.400 You can definitely kill people if you

00:54:45.980 control the algorithm.

00:54:47.220 But aren't we lucky that China,

00:54:50.140 our adversary, who is sending in

00:54:53.760 fentanyl to kill us by the tens of

00:54:56.220 thousands every year, isn't it lucky

00:54:57.980 that they haven't, like, keyed in on

00:54:59.960 this?

00:55:01.760 Yeah.

00:55:02.340 By the way, do you know that they

00:55:03.560 don't allow TikTok to be used in

00:55:07.340 China?

00:55:08.240 Yeah, the Chinese owned TikTok.

00:55:11.260 It's not allowed in China.

00:55:13.600 They have a different version that

00:55:15.000 doesn't have any of the problems.

00:55:17.660 Yeah.

00:55:18.100 So how lucky, lucky, lucky, lucky,

00:55:21.140 lucky that the Chinese government

00:55:23.200 government hasn't figured out what

00:55:24.800 every one of you know and is

00:55:26.400 obvious, that they could use that

00:55:28.360 algorithm to kill Americans.

00:55:35.740 Now, do you have any doubt that our

00:55:38.580 Congress is corrupt?

00:55:41.300 None.

00:55:42.480 None.

00:55:42.780 Now, there may be members of Congress

00:55:45.800 who are not corrupt.

00:55:46.720 Like, I have a good feeling about, you

00:55:49.780 know, Thomas Massey and Paul Rand and

00:55:52.400 a number of others, but clearly, the

00:55:56.540 reason that TikTok is still legal in

00:55:58.340 the United States clearly is

00:56:00.440 corruption.

00:56:02.040 There's nothing else it could be.

00:56:04.960 Nobody's even offered another

00:56:06.820 hypothesis.

00:56:08.780 Right?

00:56:09.520 Had there been another hypothesis where

00:56:12.280 somebody says, you know, Scott, you're

00:56:14.380 forgetting all these good reasons why

00:56:16.360 it might not be so easy.

00:56:18.540 There is no other argument.

00:56:21.380 Do we have any other national topic

00:56:23.900 where everybody's on the same side?

00:56:27.020 I've never seen one.

00:56:28.780 Everybody.

00:56:29.960 100% of the Congress is on the same

00:56:32.160 side.

00:56:32.480 And yet, TikTok's not banned.

00:56:37.020 Not banned.

00:56:38.600 Not even close.

00:56:40.080 There's not a vote.

00:56:41.460 I don't believe there's any

00:56:42.340 legislation.

00:56:44.080 There's no conversation.

00:56:46.360 Right?

00:56:48.360 That has to be massive corruption.

00:56:53.240 Give me any other hypothesis.

00:56:56.620 Any other hypothesis.

00:56:58.780 There is none.

00:57:00.460 It's obvious.

00:57:01.320 And it's like the rapid testing

00:57:03.200 scandal.

00:57:04.980 That the news treated as like it

00:57:06.840 wasn't a scandal.

00:57:07.560 Well, the biggest corruption we've

00:57:09.740 ever seen, unless we find out

00:57:11.320 something about the vaccinations

00:57:12.460 was as sketchy as it looks.

00:57:16.100 Was it even covered in the news?

00:57:17.960 Does the news cover the fact that

00:57:19.500 there's no debate on TikTok and yet

00:57:21.920 no action?

00:57:23.420 No.

00:57:24.340 No.

00:57:24.700 It's not covered on the left.

00:57:26.580 And it's not covered on the right.

00:57:28.380 Now, in both cases, they complain

00:57:30.840 about fentanyl.

00:57:31.560 And they complain about fentanyl deaths.

00:57:35.300 But they don't complain about

00:57:37.220 TikTok killing people and then tell

00:57:40.580 us that nobody's doing anything about

00:57:41.980 it when that's obviously the case.

00:57:45.540 What else could it be?

00:57:46.900 I mean, really.

00:57:48.420 Now, here's a perfect situation where

00:57:51.380 if I were talking about an individual

00:57:53.920 human citizen, I would not say that

00:57:57.440 they're guilty without proof.

00:57:59.780 I'd say, no, no, a citizen is innocent.

00:58:03.500 You better bring some serious proof

00:58:05.860 if you're going to accuse a citizen

00:58:07.960 of a crime.

00:58:09.360 But the government?

00:58:11.400 The government is presumed guilty

00:58:13.100 unless they can show you some

00:58:14.480 transparency to show you that

00:58:16.440 they're treating you seriously.

00:58:17.680 And they have no transparency,

00:58:19.540 no argument.

00:58:21.300 They are guilty by definition.

00:58:25.080 In the same way a citizen is

00:58:27.160 innocent by definition,

00:58:28.620 you know, our system just defines it

00:58:31.120 that way, until guilty.

00:58:32.740 The government, by definition,

00:58:34.600 is guilty.

00:58:35.840 By definition.

00:58:37.100 If they won't tell you or even engage

00:58:39.040 in the conversation,

00:58:40.700 that's just guilty.

00:58:41.840 And anything that you assume otherwise

00:58:43.560 doesn't make sense.

00:58:48.160 Yeah.

00:58:48.900 Yeah, the TikTok is an educational product

00:58:52.180 in China.

00:58:54.020 All right.

00:58:59.280 And that, ladies and gentlemen,

00:59:04.560 let me give you another insight into this.

00:59:08.780 I'm not going to tell you what the topic was,

00:59:11.860 but several weeks ago,

00:59:14.400 social media was messing with my head

00:59:19.620 because I made the mistake

00:59:21.140 of looking at some specific content,

00:59:23.720 you know, nothing disgusting,

00:59:25.200 don't be weird.

00:59:26.420 I looked at some content,

00:59:27.880 you know, legal, ordinary content,

00:59:29.760 and then the algorithm started serving me

00:59:31.940 more of it.

00:59:34.080 And it really messed with my life

00:59:36.680 because I couldn't break the habit

00:59:39.680 of looking at,

00:59:41.520 it was Instagram,

00:59:43.400 I couldn't break the habit,

00:59:44.560 but it was feeding me things

00:59:46.520 that made it impossible to sleep.

00:59:49.280 I couldn't sleep,

00:59:50.940 like, for weeks.

00:59:52.340 And it was only because

00:59:53.080 there was a recurring thought

00:59:54.900 that the algorithm

00:59:57.420 kept putting in my head.

00:59:58.600 And every time it would, like,

00:59:59.780 wear off,

01:00:00.900 every time I looked at it,

01:00:01.900 it would go back in my head.

01:00:03.280 Now, it doesn't matter

01:00:04.660 what the content is,

01:00:06.900 it only matters that

01:00:08.280 I couldn't turn it off

01:00:09.500 and I couldn't stop looking at it.

01:00:11.260 So that actually

01:00:16.180 caused me major health problems,

01:00:19.360 like actual health problems

01:00:21.020 from Instagram algorithm.

01:00:23.720 Not a joke,

01:00:25.520 very clearly a health problem

01:00:28.640 because I couldn't sleep

01:00:29.920 more than a few hours a night

01:00:31.200 for night after night.

01:00:32.900 That's a health problem.

01:00:34.000 That's a pretty major health problem, right?

01:00:36.180 And that came just from the algorithm.

01:00:38.960 And it wasn't because

01:00:40.000 I looked for something.

01:00:41.260 It was because something

01:00:42.300 was served to me.

01:00:43.680 And now it wasn't about

01:00:44.400 my personal life.

01:00:47.060 Then, here's another one.

01:00:50.440 I found some humor

01:00:52.160 and interest

01:00:52.940 in some anti-relationship content.

01:00:57.040 Meaning it was people saying

01:00:58.800 that men and women

01:01:00.080 basically are never going

01:01:01.940 to get along.

01:01:03.240 Because there's something

01:01:04.220 about modern life

01:01:05.180 which has made men and women

01:01:07.540 toxic to each other.

01:01:09.040 Like, we just don't have a way

01:01:10.240 to be partners anymore.

01:01:11.920 And it was basically

01:01:13.420 very strongly

01:01:15.260 would encourage you

01:01:16.100 never to get married

01:01:17.100 or be in a serious relationship.

01:01:20.400 And once I looked at some of them,

01:01:23.120 the algorithm started giving me

01:01:24.700 just bearing me with

01:01:27.040 don't be in a relationship.

01:01:31.000 Now, would that be a benefit

01:01:32.440 to China

01:01:33.340 to have an algorithm

01:01:35.300 convince people

01:01:36.160 not to get married

01:01:37.000 and have children?

01:01:37.620 Yeah.

01:01:40.580 Yup.

01:01:41.960 If I were in charge

01:01:43.680 of the algorithm,

01:01:45.000 I would be promoting

01:01:46.660 don't have children,

01:01:49.020 don't get married,

01:01:50.400 don't do any kind

01:01:51.560 of classical relationship.

01:01:53.400 It's all broken.

01:01:54.960 You have to go do something

01:01:56.680 totally different

01:01:57.500 and it'll just feed you

01:01:59.080 over and over again.

01:02:00.280 And I started getting inundated.

01:02:01.880 And at first,

01:02:03.920 I thought,

01:02:04.420 whoa, these are,

01:02:05.600 I love the fact

01:02:06.360 that these are

01:02:06.880 outside the mainstream.

01:02:08.660 Right?

01:02:09.020 I love the way

01:02:10.340 it's expressed.

01:02:11.760 The people who are

01:02:12.780 on these videos

01:02:13.620 were really good.

01:02:15.040 They were just charismatic.

01:02:16.920 They had good

01:02:17.940 communication skills.

01:02:19.060 And as content,

01:02:21.180 it was good stuff.

01:02:22.560 Just as content,

01:02:23.500 entertaining.

01:02:24.640 But what did it do

01:02:25.440 to my life?

01:02:27.400 If I had been

01:02:28.240 a younger person

01:02:29.280 and I was,

01:02:30.460 you know,

01:02:30.720 questioning whether

01:02:31.440 I get married

01:02:32.040 and have kids,

01:02:32.960 it would absolutely

01:02:34.020 have reprogrammed me.

01:02:35.180 It was strong enough

01:02:37.020 that it would have

01:02:38.420 changed my

01:02:39.580 procreation

01:02:41.920 preferences.

01:02:44.480 It would have changed

01:02:46.320 my reproductive

01:02:48.580 preferences.

01:02:50.880 And I could feel it

01:02:52.140 in real time.

01:02:53.420 Like,

01:02:53.820 I could feel it

01:02:54.780 changing my brain.

01:02:57.540 Right?

01:02:57.880 And you saw me

01:02:58.580 mention it a number

01:02:59.500 of times

01:03:00.040 because you could see

01:03:00.920 it was taking up

01:03:02.480 a little real estate.

01:03:05.300 And now,

01:03:06.340 just imagine somebody

01:03:07.300 doing that intentionally.

01:03:09.500 Maybe it is intentional.

01:03:11.140 No way to know.

01:03:12.320 But imagine if I had

01:03:13.980 control of the algorithm.

01:03:16.500 There's two examples

01:03:17.800 where I know

01:03:19.020 I could make you

01:03:19.660 less healthy.

01:03:21.180 I could make you

01:03:22.100 less healthy

01:03:22.600 because I experienced it.

01:03:24.100 I'd give you

01:03:24.620 just disturbing images

01:03:25.760 and you wouldn't

01:03:26.240 sleep well.

01:03:27.220 And then your health

01:03:27.860 would be bad.

01:03:30.360 Or I could tell you

01:03:31.480 that the things

01:03:32.120 which we know

01:03:32.760 are good for you

01:03:33.640 are really bad for you.

01:03:35.820 For example,

01:03:37.360 if you were China,

01:03:39.260 would you let

01:03:40.000 the algorithm

01:03:40.720 present lots of

01:03:43.200 being overweight

01:03:45.440 is good for you

01:03:46.680 content?

01:03:49.340 Would you?

01:03:50.940 Do you think

01:03:51.920 that the United States,

01:03:53.280 which has always

01:03:53.880 had a history

01:03:54.520 of telling people

01:03:55.660 to exercise,

01:03:57.020 right,

01:03:57.460 through the 60s

01:03:58.360 and 70s

01:03:59.100 and Arnold Schwarzenegger,

01:04:00.580 the government

01:04:01.740 has always said,

01:04:02.680 oh, exercise,

01:04:03.560 exercise is good for you.

01:04:05.760 But what would China

01:04:08.020 want the United States

01:04:09.100 to do?

01:04:09.540 China would want us

01:04:11.440 to value our fatness

01:04:13.180 and say,

01:04:14.500 don't change me.

01:04:15.680 This is just me.

01:04:17.020 Body positivity.

01:04:18.900 And by the way,

01:04:19.960 the women can all

01:04:20.980 weigh 400 pounds

01:04:22.180 and you men,

01:04:23.480 you still want to

01:04:24.380 mate with them

01:04:25.060 because, you know,

01:04:27.040 you don't want

01:04:27.420 to be a jerk.

01:04:29.660 Yeah.

01:04:30.900 China could absolutely

01:04:32.260 end us

01:04:32.960 just with TikTok.

01:04:35.840 And our Congress

01:04:37.220 is completely blind

01:04:38.700 to it.

01:04:40.100 That's the best

01:04:40.900 case scenario.

01:04:42.100 But I think

01:04:42.880 they're bought off.

01:04:44.340 I think they're

01:04:44.880 bought off.

01:04:45.940 So at this point,

01:04:46.880 China has the fentanyl

01:04:48.400 in our veins

01:04:49.060 and they got the finger

01:04:50.740 on the plunger

01:04:51.500 and the best

01:04:53.200 we can hope for

01:04:54.060 is they don't push

01:04:56.360 their finger

01:04:56.780 on the plunger.

01:04:58.240 But the needle's

01:04:59.140 in our arm,

01:05:00.180 right?

01:05:00.640 The TikTok's here.

01:05:02.080 It's already

01:05:02.760 in our kids' hands.

01:05:04.340 The needle's in.

01:05:05.920 All they have to do

01:05:06.760 is push the plunger

01:05:07.660 and they can take

01:05:08.880 out our whole society

01:05:09.880 if they haven't

01:05:13.000 already.

01:05:16.380 Because what would

01:05:17.260 it look like

01:05:17.820 if they did?

01:05:20.460 Body positivity.

01:05:23.980 Maybe you should

01:05:25.480 try being gay.

01:05:28.900 Maybe you shouldn't

01:05:29.740 get married.

01:05:32.720 Maybe you should

01:05:33.560 complain more

01:05:34.160 about wokeness

01:05:34.920 because that's

01:05:35.340 what's important.

01:05:38.500 Almost everything

01:05:39.620 that's on social media

01:05:40.960 is destructive.

01:05:45.480 Now, here's what

01:05:46.500 I don't know.

01:05:47.660 Is there also

01:05:48.440 a thriving TikTok

01:05:50.240 pro-health exercise

01:05:53.020 part of it

01:05:54.300 that I never see?

01:05:56.220 Maybe.

01:05:57.520 But, you know,

01:05:58.580 that would still

01:05:59.400 get lost in the noise.

01:06:00.600 All right.

01:06:09.860 Yeah, there's one.

01:06:12.640 If China wanted

01:06:13.540 to destroy

01:06:14.160 the United States,

01:06:15.220 would they promote

01:06:16.400 Andrew Tate's

01:06:18.240 videos?

01:06:21.020 Think about it.

01:06:22.700 If China wanted

01:06:23.700 to destroy

01:06:24.360 the United States,

01:06:25.280 would they promote

01:06:26.080 Andrew Tate's

01:06:27.040 videos?

01:06:27.340 Who was the

01:06:29.840 most viral

01:06:30.660 content

01:06:31.200 recently?

01:06:35.060 Andrew Tate.

01:06:36.480 The most viral

01:06:37.220 and TikTok

01:06:38.180 was the

01:06:39.100 leading cause

01:06:40.260 of that, right?

01:06:41.520 It was mostly

01:06:42.100 a TikTok thing.

01:06:44.680 So China

01:06:45.320 may have decided

01:06:47.800 unless the algorithm

01:06:49.260 did it itself

01:06:50.040 because Tate

01:06:50.840 did a lot of things

01:06:51.520 to make things

01:06:52.140 viral.

01:06:52.820 So, I mean,

01:06:53.380 he was pushing

01:06:54.700 himself.

01:06:55.620 So we don't know

01:06:56.140 if maybe that was

01:06:57.120 enough.

01:07:00.640 It looks like

01:07:01.380 they're trying

01:07:01.720 to encourage

01:07:02.240 obesity.

01:07:03.220 Yeah.

01:07:05.600 So I would just

01:07:06.740 put that out there

01:07:07.800 that the needles

01:07:09.740 in the arm

01:07:10.300 and we're trusting

01:07:11.600 our adversary

01:07:12.520 not to push

01:07:13.360 the plunger.

01:07:14.600 So great job,

01:07:15.540 Congress.

01:07:16.400 That, ladies and

01:07:17.260 gentlemen,

01:07:17.520 is the best

01:07:18.360 live stream

01:07:19.020 you've ever seen.

01:07:20.100 I hope it

01:07:20.620 challenged your

01:07:21.540 current thinking.

01:07:22.780 I don't know

01:07:23.060 if anything I'm

01:07:23.640 saying is true,

01:07:24.580 but I know

01:07:26.560 we're not

01:07:26.980 thinking broadly

01:07:29.040 enough about

01:07:29.940 what the

01:07:31.000 possibilities are.

01:07:32.440 That being

01:07:32.960 my theme

01:07:33.560 of the day.

01:07:34.580 And YouTube,

01:07:35.240 I'm going to say

01:07:35.580 goodbye to you

01:07:36.060 now.

01:07:37.160 I'm going to

01:07:37.620 talk to the

01:07:38.320 locals

01:07:39.400 platform

01:07:40.320 privately

01:07:40.960 and I will

01:07:43.120 see you tomorrow.

01:07:44.280 Bye for now.

01:07:45.440 Best live stream

01:07:46.100 you've ever seen.

01:07:46.640 минут,

01:07:48.640 Gilmore,

01:07:49.980 September 16,

01:07:50.240 April 16,

01:07:50.740 June 16,

01:07:51.660 June 16,

01:07:52.600 March 16,

01:07:54.060 June 16,

01:07:54.640 June 16,

01:07:55.420 December 17,

01:07:56.740 June 17,

01:07:57.880 In여 Larsen,

01:07:57.940 August 16,

01:07:58.660 June 26,

01:07:59.380 June 23,

01:08:00.640 June 17,

01:08:02.440 June 17,

01:08:03.240 June 17,

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - January 14, 2023

Episode 1988 Scott Adams： Everything The News Gets Wrong Because They Are Not Engineers

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript