Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2006 Scott Adams： Lots Of Conspiracy Theories Confirmed This Year. Big Things Coming

00:00:00.000 Good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of civilization. It's called

00:00:11.400 coffee with Scott Adams and there's never been a finer moment. Would you like to take it up a

00:00:16.740 level? Yeah, up a level. And all you need for that is a cupper mug or a glass of tankard,

00:00:23.280 chalice of stein, a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:28.380 I like coffee. Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine of the day thing makes

00:00:34.840 everything better. It's called simultaneous sip. Go.

00:00:44.820 End the Fed. I'm seeing somebody say, end the Fed. Well, I'd be in favor of that if I knew what it was.

00:00:54.100 Does anybody know what the Federal Reserve does?

00:00:58.380 I managed to get a degree in economics and walk away thinking, I'm not entirely sure what they do.

00:01:06.420 Well, anyway, let's talk about some of the things in the news.

00:01:13.000 I was seeing a tweet from Adam Townsend. He was sending people to his blog. Now, Adam Townsend is

00:01:20.480 another strong follow on Twitter. If you're not following him, you're missing a lot of different

00:01:26.660 stuff. There are some people on Twitter who tend to be boosters of things you've already seen, and

00:01:34.300 they're good too. But Adam tends to have completely different takes on stuff. But in this case, I think

00:01:42.000 this is something some of us saw but forgot. In 2020, there was a hack on Twitter. I kind of vaguely

00:01:48.000 remember that. But here's a detail I did not know until I read Adam Townsend's blog that he tweeted at today.

00:01:55.840 So apparently, Twitter was hacked by a 17-year-old and some friends. A 17-year-old. And if you wondered,

00:02:07.520 how did he crack the security for Twitter? Because you know, Twitter's a major social platform,

00:02:15.180 obviously. Obviously, they've got some pretty strong security going on there. So here's how the 17-year-old

00:02:21.500 did it. He called some Twitter employees and said he was Twitter IT support, and he asked them for

00:02:27.420 their passwords. That's not even the best part. That's not even the best part.

00:02:40.540 Some of them actually gave their passwords over the phone.

00:02:44.040 And that's not the best part. That's not the best part either. The best part is that average

00:02:55.380 employees, you know, just, I think they were just average employees, gave their passwords.

00:03:01.840 And that was enough to acquire God mode over the entire network. Apparently, you could have anybody's

00:03:09.620 password if they were in engineering. And they gave you God mode over the entire network.

00:03:16.640 Now, if you don't believe that's true, apparently there is testimony from somebody who was hired to

00:03:23.080 look into the security. He testified to Congress. This guy named Mudge was his nickname. And apparently,

00:03:31.700 anybody who worked in engineering had full access to Twitter's guts. All of the engineers could change

00:03:39.960 Twitter. Do you remember long ago when I was speculating that Dorsey probably didn't know,

00:03:52.800 that Jack Dorsey probably didn't know who was doing what with Twitter? Do you remember everybody

00:03:59.380 laughed at me? Do you remember how you laughed? Oh, how you laughed. Come on. Dorsey knows exactly

00:04:07.120 what's going on there. Nope. Nope. It turns out that every engineer could have changed the guts of

00:04:13.060 Twitter. Had full access. And there's no log of changes. Did you hear that? All of the engineers could

00:04:22.540 change the guts of Twitter. And there was no log of the changes. Those are confirmed facts from somebody

00:04:32.780 whose job it was to look into that stuff. Now, did you know any of that? Did you know any of that?

00:04:40.660 Somehow I missed all of that. But it's in the public record. It's not subject to speculation.

00:04:46.540 And apparently, you know, Twitter is built in such a way that it's really hard to catch up and fix all

00:04:56.640 the security problems. So Elon Musk has a big challenge, a technical challenge that's almost

00:05:04.400 unimaginable in its complexity. But if anybody could sort it out, at least the right people are working

00:05:11.740 on it. So that's good. Texas, Governor Abbott is making a clear call for universal school choice in

00:05:23.320 Texas. And he wants something with education savings accounts, etc. The big story here is I don't think

00:05:32.320 anything's going to stop it at this point. I believe that education will just enter the private sphere

00:05:39.860 and the free market will make it work again. Now, there will definitely always be people in public

00:05:46.700 schools, I think. But the public schools are going to have to do something different to, you know, to show

00:05:53.840 that they can compete with private schools. But it's happening. It's happening. So it takes a while.

00:06:00.020 But there's this positive trend. All right. Here's a macro theme.

00:06:09.860 Every time I read a news story that's really good, like it gives me stuff I didn't know,

00:06:18.700 and it's pointing to actually source material. And it tells a story that really gives me the full,

00:06:24.500 rich context. And I finally understand a thing. Where did I see it? You tell me. I saw something with

00:06:32.800 great context and really good sources. Where did I see it? Twitter threads by individuals who are

00:06:42.020 really good at it. Why do we know the Twitter files? Because of people like Matt Taibbi, right?

00:06:50.180 Individual citizens who look into stuff and find out. Well, why do we know as much as we do about,

00:06:56.300 you know, the real situation with energy and homelessness and stuff like that? Michael Schellenberger.

00:07:04.220 Michael Schellenberger is unambiguously, unambiguously the best, I guess you'd call him an

00:07:10.460 individual who's doing journalism. For the most breadth of, you know, different important topics

00:07:17.940 and the greatest, greatest depth of research. And there's another, and I'll talk about that in a

00:07:24.340 minute. Kyle Becker. Do you follow Kyle Becker? Any of Kyle Becker's threads are better than the

00:07:32.560 news that night. And it's not just that he's good. He's very good, by the way. You should follow him.

00:07:37.980 But he's one of now, I would say, close to a dozen. There are maybe a dozen individuals who will do

00:07:47.140 fairly frequent Twitter threads that are just far better than anything in the news. Now, some of it...

00:07:54.220 Yeah. Anyway. Got distracted there by comment.

00:08:07.680 So, let me read to you some of these, the things which we're finding. All right. This is from Kyle

00:08:12.700 Becker's Twitter thread. And I've seen this before, but Kyle does a good job of putting it in a real

00:08:20.600 clean package here. So, you all know Bob Woodward, right? So, Woodward and Bernstein were the two

00:08:27.780 reporters for the Washington Post who broke the Watergate story. It was a story that brought down

00:08:33.600 Nixon. And it was Nixon got some burglars to burglarize a Democrat office in the Watergate 0.98

00:08:41.800 tower and got caught. And then that brought down Nixon. So, here's an interesting thing we find out

00:08:50.280 about Bob Woodward, right? So, Bob Woodward, one of the two important people in this story.

00:08:57.240 Interesting. This is from Kyle Becker's Twitter thread. Soon after leaving the Navy, Woodward was hired by

00:09:06.320 the most powerful news outlet and given the biggest news story in the country. So, he wasn't a seasoned

00:09:14.860 reporter, but he got a job at the most important news outlet or one of the two. And immediately

00:09:22.540 was given one of the biggest, most important stories in the country. How did he get his sources

00:09:29.080 for that? Well, the source for the Watergate stuff was the deputy director of the FBI, Mark Felt,

00:09:38.620 who also was known to run the FBI co-intel pro program, which was designed to discredit political

00:09:47.260 actors and the federal agencies that they want to destroy, such as Richard Nixon.

00:09:53.820 And by the way, there was a lawyer who was working on the staff of the Judiciary Committee during the

00:10:06.260 Nixon inquiry. Do you know who that was? There was an attorney working on that. It was a Hillary Clinton.

00:10:12.460 It was Hillary Clinton. And then Kyle sums it up this way. So he goes, so if you watch the deep state

00:10:24.900 panic during the Trump years, the Russia hoax orchestrated by Hillary Clinton, two Trump impeachment

00:10:32.140 hoaxes, January 6th charade, FBI Mar-a-Lago raid, and now the Biden classified document scandal,

00:10:39.820 don't be surprised. They've been doing this for a very long time.

00:10:46.940 It's all true. The Watergate was bullshit. Watergate was just an FBI deep state project to take

00:10:54.380 Nixon out. Now, Nixon probably, you know, did it, in fact, authorize it, so he committed a crime.

00:11:01.160 But my current belief, subject to, you know, I suppose I could change my mind later,

00:11:09.000 but I always believed, until maybe a year or so ago, that Watergate was just what it looked like.

00:11:16.240 Two intrepid reporters, you know, dug into it, got this scoop, took down the president.

00:11:22.880 Turns out it was actually a deep state operation. The whole thing was bullshit. It was a deep state

00:11:29.640 operation. And Hillary Clinton was right in the middle of it. And it's apparently what,

00:11:34.020 it's just a pattern that they just do over and over again. They create hoaxes, and they have enough

00:11:40.240 power in the media to sell them. Now, do you remember all the time that Bernstein became just

00:11:45.540 a joke, because he would come on CNN and say that anything Trump did was worse than Watergate?

00:11:50.400 And I thought to myself, how could this guy, who seems so dumb and so biased, have been one of the

00:11:59.820 crack reporters that worked with Woodward? Because I thought, well, it must have been Woodward who was

00:12:06.540 the smart one, because the other guy is obviously an idiot. Like, when you see him on TV, he's just,

00:12:14.160 it looks like he's just working for a treat or something. It doesn't even look like there's a

00:12:18.400 functioning brain going on there. And now when you see that there's, let's say, some interesting

00:12:25.680 history to the other one, you can see that the two of them were just part of some deep state

00:12:31.960 operation, apparently. Apparently. Now, it turns out that Trump is suing Woodward for $49 million

00:12:38.480 for using Trump's audio tapes out of context. Apparently, Trump says he had only authorized the

00:12:46.400 audio tapes for the purpose of writing the book, but when the audio tapes are shown on their own

00:12:52.240 and out of context, because they always would be out of context, they're misleading and make him look

00:12:58.120 bad. Now, I don't think he can win that case. Probably not. But it does show you that Woodward is

00:13:04.640 sketchy. Because I do believe, without even hearing the audio tapes,

00:13:10.640 I feel a high level of confidence with no knowledge that they're misleading and that they're designed

00:13:19.440 to make Trump look bad. Do you have any doubt about that? Do you have any doubt about that? No.

00:13:29.080 I don't think so. All right. Here's my take on the cartels and what's happening with fentanyl and all

00:13:44.640 that stuff. Going to the whiteboard. So we're sort of in an interesting race here. So I would say if

00:13:54.220 you look at the odds of going to war with the cartels, well, the more people who die of fentanyl

00:14:00.180 and the fact that politicians on both sides, bipartisan, are both talking about it, the odds

00:14:07.240 of war are going to go to 100% unless something intervenes. Would you agree? That if there's no

00:14:15.080 other outside forces, the odds of war and direct attack of the cartels is 100%. Now, we're not there.

00:14:23.200 We're probably down here. Probably down around, I don't know, 25%. But that will grow the more

00:14:31.640 people who die from fentanyl and the more militaristic the cartels look. But the trouble

00:14:38.640 is, one assumes that the cartels with their tens of billions of dollars are already buying up our

00:14:44.880 politicians. Because why wouldn't they? What would stop them? Seriously, what would stop them?

00:14:51.980 They know that the United States is going to come for them. The only way they can stop it, because they

00:14:58.420 can't beat us militarily, is to stop us politically. So you don't think that they're already building an

00:15:04.880 entire base of bought-off politicians? Now, they may be starting at the city level, you know, with like

00:15:11.700 council people and stuff, and trying to like get control of them. And then later they become,

00:15:16.420 you know, higher up in politics. So it could be what China's doing. You know, China would find a

00:15:23.360 Eric Swalwell, and then they would say, you know, I think this person might get elected to higher

00:15:29.280 office. So they make friends when he's still at the city level, right? You don't think the cartels are

00:15:35.280 doing that? With tens of billions of dollars, their biggest mortal risk is not Mexico, because they 1.00

00:15:42.060 already control Mexico. Their biggest risk is the United States. Do you think they're just waiting? 0.90

00:15:47.900 Do you think the cartels are just waiting? Oh, we'll just keep making money, nothing will happen to us.

00:15:54.480 No, they know we're coming for them. They know we're coming. So they've got to buy our politicians as

00:16:01.340 quickly as possible. My estimate is we have three to five years. In three to five years, the cartels will

00:16:08.340 effectively control our government. Because that's their only play. And there's no level of risk they

00:16:15.820 wouldn't be willing to take to get that done. Am I right? There's no level of risk that they would

00:16:22.820 walk away from. This is a mortal risk. This ends them completely. They have to buy their way to control

00:16:31.600 the government. They have to. You don't think they know that? Of course they do. The mafia knows it.

00:16:39.980 They already bought the government of Mexico. Do you think that they bought the entire government

00:16:46.880 of Mexico and it never occurred to them, maybe buy a little bit of the government of the United States

00:16:52.620 with their billions of dollars? They never thought of it? Of course they did. And of course they're doing

00:16:58.000 it. And they're doing it as fast as they can. If we don't beat this window and take him out before

00:17:05.500 they have too much control of the government, we'll never be able to do it.

00:17:09.240 So when you see Dan Crenshaw say we should go in militarily, the one thing I can know for sure,

00:17:23.880 no matter what else you want to criticize Crenshaw for, he's not been bought off. Would you agree?

00:17:32.040 Clearly he hasn't been bought off because he's going after them. Likewise, there are a number of other

00:17:38.760 people you could say have definitely not been bought off. Trump has definitely not been bought

00:17:44.340 off. Yeah, you can call Crenshaw whatever you want. I'm not in that conversation. I'm just saying

00:17:50.060 there are some people, at least on the Democrat side for sure, or I'm sorry, on the Republican side,

00:17:56.520 and at least one Democrat, who have definitely not been bought off. Definitely not. But that's not

00:18:02.960 going to last. You know, I don't believe that Biden, I mean, do you think Biden hasn't been bought off?

00:18:14.660 Look at what Hunter's been doing, collecting money from other countries. You don't think

00:18:20.980 that Hunter found a way to make some cartel money? I mean, I don't have any evidence to suggest he did.

00:18:27.900 But wouldn't that be the most obvious place to get your money? And wouldn't it be the only thing to

00:18:32.920 explain why Biden seems to be doing whatever the cartels want? Because he's not really taking the

00:18:40.340 border seriously, and he's not taking the cartel seriously. He's not taking them even a little bit

00:18:44.900 seriously. The evidence would strongly suggest that Biden's been compromised via Hunter. Now,

00:18:52.560 here's the world we live in. I just gave you this whole long list of all the hoaxes. You've seen

00:19:00.660 my list of, you know, over 20 hoaxes. And we know the pattern and how things are done. Shouldn't you

00:19:07.640 assume, with no evidence whatsoever, just based on what you can see, that's not in question? It's not

00:19:16.220 in question that Biden is doing a poor job of border security. There's no question about that.

00:19:22.560 Some people think it's a preference, but there's no question about, you know, that a lot of people

00:19:26.580 are coming across the border. You have to assume at this point that the cartels have some kind of

00:19:33.840 leverage on Biden. Is that fair or unfair? Now, again, when you talk about a government,

00:19:41.320 the government is guilty until they can prove through some kind of transparency that they're not

00:19:47.760 guilty. They're not people. If it were, if we're people, they're innocent until proven guilty.

00:19:54.180 If it's the government and they have a, a multi-decade pattern of being corrupt, which is well

00:20:02.740 demonstrated from Watergate all the way to through, you know, Google and Twitter ringing the last election.

00:20:10.000 So there's no question about whether this is a group of people who do corrupt things on a regular

00:20:17.080 basis. Democrats. Now, I'm not, I'm not going to say that no Republicans done anything corrupt,

00:20:23.620 right? But, but I'm just looking at this particular pattern. The Democrats have been running hoaxes and,

00:20:31.200 and plans and ops against the American public for decades. And we know it. We're not guessing.

00:20:39.640 We know it. So you have to assume that the only reason that Mexico is not being handled is that

00:20:46.960 it's got to be, and I'm open to be proven wrong. But my assumption is, since it's obvious,

00:20:57.080 assume the obvious. Assume the obvious. And by the way, that would be an amazing thing for Trump to say.

00:21:04.020 Imagine this. You know, the cartels are trying to bribe American politicians. Would everybody say that's true?

00:21:14.220 They would, right? You know, they are, at least at the local level. So here's something Trump could say.

00:21:21.740 You know, the cartels are trying to bribe people. You know that there's no explanation for why Biden

00:21:28.020 is doing so poorly on the border and against fentanyl. Assume the obvious.

00:21:35.840 Just imagine Trump saying that. Assume it's exactly what it looks like.

00:21:40.380 That's all he has to say. Just say, assume it's exactly what it looks like. And he's done. And walk away.

00:21:50.580 Just say, here's the setup. Just assume it's exactly what you see and vote accordingly.

00:21:56.880 You know, I'll take on the cartels. He isn't. And there's only one reason.

00:22:01.940 There's only one reason. And his name is Hunter.

00:22:07.100 Now, I don't have proof of it, but you don't need it.

00:22:09.720 He's demonstrated that this is how they, that they've demonstrated that this is how they act.

00:22:15.240 Just assume it's true. You don't even need evidence.

00:22:19.000 This is so obviously, you know, the pattern that they follow.

00:22:23.640 It's up to them to prove it's not true. Right?

00:22:28.500 Can't take on the cartel money.

00:22:31.940 All right. Next story.

00:22:34.640 British Columbia.

00:22:36.700 They're going to change the law so that they're not arresting anybody for heroin, cocaine, meth, fentanyl, or ecstasy.

00:22:43.980 Now, Elon Musk actually responded to that.

00:22:47.100 He said, all things considered, this is the better approach, in my opinion.

00:22:52.220 Do you think it's a better approach to decriminalize all of those hard drugs?

00:23:00.680 And the possession.

00:23:02.940 So I think dealing is probably still illegal, but ordinary possession would not be.

00:23:07.280 In fact, they won't even take it off you.

00:23:09.360 They won't even confiscate it.

00:23:10.700 So here's the problem with this issue.

00:23:14.960 The problem with this issue is that we have a binary brain.

00:23:22.020 We all have binary brains.

00:23:23.380 And the things we understand are, it's illegal, it's illegal, or it's not illegal, and then our brain stops.

00:23:35.180 So since you've seen examples where legalizing things totally didn't work, and you only have two buckets, you only, oh, don't give me any nuance.

00:23:47.020 There are only two buckets.

00:23:47.980 So if you know that there definitely are examples where legalization totally failed, well, that's all you need to know.

00:23:56.860 Only two buckets.

00:23:59.600 But of course, in the real world, how many different ways would there be to change the drug laws without screwing the pooch?

00:24:10.020 Probably lots of ways.

00:24:11.240 Who knows if this is a small part of something bigger, or it's just one thing they're doing.

00:24:16.860 Now, I do agree that putting these people in jail doesn't make any difference.

00:24:21.520 I don't think that they go to jail, clean up, and then go on to leave good lives.

00:24:29.820 But if that is true, that'd be interesting.

00:24:33.420 You know, I could be convinced.

00:24:34.860 I don't believe that's true.

00:24:37.040 But I also don't believe any data on anything anymore.

00:24:39.660 So if you had data, I wouldn't believe it anyway.

00:24:42.460 But it seems to me that if you put somebody in jail who had not otherwise been in jail,

00:24:47.780 now they have a jail record on top of their addicts, even if they stopped.

00:24:53.200 They're still, you know that, right?

00:24:55.380 Just because you stop using, that doesn't make you not an addict.

00:24:59.520 You always have that problem forever.

00:25:02.200 So it seems like you're taking one problem and turning it into two problems.

00:25:06.240 One is you're a drug addict, and now you've got a criminal record.

00:25:09.660 So good luck.

00:25:11.060 Do you know what I would do if I were a drug addict?

00:25:14.200 I'd cleaned up, and then I tried to get a job with my criminal record, and I couldn't.

00:25:18.960 You know what I'd do?

00:25:20.180 I would deal drugs.

00:25:22.320 That's what I'd do.

00:25:24.080 No, I'm not joking.

00:25:26.140 Absolutely.

00:25:26.540 I would go to the criminal side.

00:25:29.900 I would sell drugs, because that would be my best career move.

00:25:32.520 And I'm already living this risky life, and I take drugs to make me feel good.

00:25:37.580 So now I've got money.

00:25:39.940 I don't care about the ethics of it.

00:25:41.820 I'll just go sell drugs.

00:25:43.360 And that's what I would do.

00:25:46.420 Literally, that's what I would do.

00:25:47.820 Literally.

00:25:48.660 There's no hyperbole here.

00:25:49.920 If I had a criminal record because of drugs, I would become a drug dealer.

00:25:56.140 I would.

00:25:57.440 Wouldn't you?

00:25:58.540 It's just a rational choice.

00:26:00.560 So I can see Elon Musk's point that taking somebody who's got one crushing problem in life

00:26:07.580 and adding a second crushing problem, logically, that doesn't seem to be the right approach.

00:26:16.880 Now, suppose, suppose you legalized it so you'd at least remove the one crushing problem,

00:26:24.980 but you did more about helping people have treatment or even living,

00:26:29.860 maybe helping them live somewhere where they're away from the rest of the public.

00:26:33.540 So you don't want to do what San Francisco did to create an actual physical zone

00:26:39.200 where you can all go in and shoot drugs.

00:26:41.500 Maybe the worst idea ever.

00:26:44.600 Possibly the worst idea of all time.

00:26:47.640 And let's put it right in the middle of our beautiful city that depends on, you know, tourism.

00:26:53.640 Worst idea.

00:26:55.240 Best idea might be we're going to legalize it,

00:27:00.160 but we're also going to legalize ketamine and mushrooms and other treatments.

00:27:06.640 You go to a...

00:27:09.620 You want to hear something about rehab that I heard the other day?

00:27:15.440 I heard this from a reliable source.

00:27:21.120 Apparently the government will pay for your rehab.

00:27:25.080 Did you know that?

00:27:25.780 If you're poor, I'm not sure if it's Medicaid or whatever it is,

00:27:31.200 but you know the government will pay to put you in Medicare if you don't have money, right?

00:27:36.840 Now, I didn't know that either, but apparently...

00:27:39.140 And I don't know if it's just California.

00:27:40.740 I don't know the details.

00:27:41.840 It might be just California.

00:27:43.640 But is it Medicare or Medicaid?

00:27:46.920 It's one of them.

00:27:47.780 But it's a real medical problem,

00:27:50.300 and we do give medical treatment to people who have medical problems, right?

00:27:55.080 Even if they don't have insurance.

00:27:57.480 So here's what's happening, and I'm told this is widespread.

00:28:03.960 A rehab will, of course, want people to go there,

00:28:07.260 and the government will pay.

00:28:09.380 So there are body people, people who go out and find addicts,

00:28:13.380 and they talk them into going to rehab.

00:28:15.320 So far, so good, right?

00:28:18.260 No problem with that.

00:28:20.120 Go talk the addicts into rehab.

00:28:24.160 They go into rehab, and then the government pays the bill,

00:28:27.640 and the rehab is happy, right?

00:28:30.180 And then the person who went in there, presumably,

00:28:33.000 they would be happy, wouldn't you say?

00:28:34.680 Because they got free rehab.

00:28:36.640 Pretty good deal.

00:28:38.380 Except the people that are gathered up

00:28:41.920 are people who do not want to be straight.

00:28:45.320 They're paid to go to rehab.

00:28:49.820 Yep.

00:28:51.120 They pay them to go to rehab

00:28:53.360 with no expectation that anybody will try to fix them.

00:28:57.720 As soon as they're out,

00:28:59.360 if they do their two weeks or whatever it is,

00:29:02.260 do you know what the body person does?

00:29:05.080 Scores them some drugs right away

00:29:07.040 so they can be the person you bring back in again.

00:29:12.000 If you get them high as soon as they're out,

00:29:15.500 you already have their contact information.

00:29:17.460 You know who they are.

00:29:18.580 You know that they've said yes once to taking a check

00:29:21.280 to pretending to be in rehab,

00:29:23.540 so they go and they pretend to be in rehab again.

00:29:25.680 It turns out there's some large part,

00:29:29.700 I don't know the percentage.

00:29:31.140 I'm sure there are also plenty of completely ethical rehab places.

00:29:36.480 But the whole industry has got a problem.

00:29:39.940 That it looks like the way the money works,

00:29:42.760 they don't have an incentive to fix anybody.

00:29:45.520 They have an incentive to pump the same addicts

00:29:48.220 through their system as often as possible.

00:29:49.860 Now, I'm also not aware of any rehab that works.

00:29:55.360 I realize that's controversial.

00:29:58.160 I'm not aware of any that work.

00:30:00.720 And in California, anyway,

00:30:02.100 there's a lot of belief

00:30:03.520 that there's some kind of support services for addicts.

00:30:06.560 There really isn't.

00:30:08.500 You can look as hard as you want.

00:30:09.940 There won't be any.

00:30:10.820 There's nothing.

00:30:11.740 You're pretty much on your own.

00:30:13.840 So imagine if British Columbia did the following things.

00:30:18.120 And I'm not saying they will.

00:30:19.140 I'm just making a larger case

00:30:20.880 that there's a right way and a wrong way to do stuff.

00:30:24.380 The wrong way was,

00:30:26.300 I think some European countries did free needles and stuff.

00:30:30.880 Didn't work out as well as they wanted.

00:30:33.040 San Francisco did the free needle zone.

00:30:35.820 Totally disaster.

00:30:37.780 So there are lots of bad ways to legalize drugs.

00:30:41.360 But imagine a good way.

00:30:43.660 Just imagine that they said,

00:30:46.340 we're not going to arrest you.

00:30:48.200 And in addition,

00:30:50.120 for free,

00:30:51.620 we could put you through one of these

00:30:53.320 psychedelic facilities

00:30:57.160 that will give you different drugs

00:30:59.240 and make you not care about

00:31:02.120 taking hard drugs later.

00:31:05.480 So compare these two things.

00:31:08.100 Hey, I'm going to take you to rehab.

00:31:09.920 Let's put yourself in the mind of an addict for a moment.

00:31:15.180 And I come to you and say,

00:31:16.000 hey, addict, I've got a deal for you.

00:31:18.920 We're going to take away the thing

00:31:20.700 that you care about the most,

00:31:22.760 your drugs,

00:31:23.940 but we're going to replace that

00:31:26.500 with a sterile environment

00:31:27.960 in which we take away

00:31:29.880 all of your other forms of entertainment.

00:31:31.760 And it's really going to hurt.

00:31:35.760 But on the plus side,

00:31:36.860 we'll talk to you.

00:31:38.080 We'll do some talking.

00:31:39.920 And that talking might help,

00:31:41.680 but probably not.

00:31:43.420 So you're going to go to the worst place in the world

00:31:45.560 while you'll feel worse

00:31:47.280 than you've ever felt before.

00:31:48.740 How about that?

00:31:49.380 Huh?

00:31:49.820 Huh?

00:31:50.460 Sign up.

00:31:51.500 Everybody good?

00:31:52.500 Come on.

00:31:52.980 Come on.

00:31:53.280 It's going to be terrible.

00:31:54.560 It's going to be hell on earth.

00:31:55.880 Come on in.

00:31:57.120 All right.

00:31:57.360 Now compare that.

00:31:59.140 Compare that.

00:32:01.300 To, I've got another option.

00:32:04.220 Instead of taking the fentanyl and the cocaine,

00:32:07.800 how would you like to try this thing called ketamine?

00:32:11.380 Or this thing called mushrooms?

00:32:13.720 Oh, you've done mushrooms.

00:32:14.960 Okay.

00:32:15.400 So you're already comfortable with that.

00:32:17.780 I'll tell you what we'll do.

00:32:19.580 We'll take you from the drugs you're on,

00:32:21.680 which are awesome,

00:32:22.400 but we're going to put you on some other awesome drugs.

00:32:26.360 Pretty awesome.

00:32:27.780 These might be so awesome

00:32:29.180 that you won't even need those other ones anymore.

00:32:32.320 Yeah, I've been hearing about this thing called ibogaine,

00:32:34.440 but I don't know what that is.

00:32:35.820 I don't know anything about that,

00:32:37.380 but I've heard it a few times.

00:32:40.000 Now, which one do you take?

00:32:41.360 You're an addict.

00:32:43.100 Does the addict take hell on earth?

00:32:47.000 Or I've got some other good drugs.

00:32:49.240 You're going to like them a lot.

00:32:52.380 Seriously.

00:32:53.960 Have I made my point?

00:32:55.100 We know that we know the drug intervention is very strong.

00:33:01.460 We know the drug intervention,

00:33:03.420 you know, using psychedelics,

00:33:05.180 very strong in terms of cure rates and fixing people.

00:33:10.520 And it sounds like fun, frankly.

00:33:13.420 If I'm an addict,

00:33:14.860 and you tell me I can do these other drugs

00:33:16.920 and it might make me not even care about the ones I was doing,

00:33:20.740 I'm all about that.

00:33:22.100 I'd be all over that.

00:33:24.100 Wouldn't you?

00:33:25.560 I mean, remember, you're already a drug addict.

00:33:28.260 If you're already a drug addict,

00:33:29.940 you're not saying no to ketamine or mushrooms

00:33:33.400 or ayahuasca or whatever they're going to use, DMT.

00:33:36.840 I don't know.

00:33:37.160 So, all I want to make,

00:33:42.200 I'm just going to make one point.

00:33:43.960 If you're still living in the world of two buckets,

00:33:46.940 you know, this is the Greg Gottfeld point,

00:33:49.740 the prison of two ideas.

00:33:52.840 If you're in the prison of two ideas,

00:33:54.940 then legalizing looks like the worst thing anybody ever thought of

00:33:57.940 because it never works.

00:33:58.820 But the very moment you say,

00:34:01.520 well, what would work?

00:34:03.820 And why don't we add that to the legalizing part? 0.95

00:34:07.140 It starts getting easy.

00:34:09.940 Am I wrong?

00:34:12.180 That the solution is sort of easy.

00:34:15.720 You just have to make it voluntary

00:34:17.920 and offer a drug-related course

00:34:21.640 that we know works.

00:34:23.660 So, I think we might be closer to something,

00:34:28.980 but I'm not in favor of turning drug addicts

00:34:32.960 into criminals for some purposes of our own, I guess.

00:34:38.220 I don't know why we do that.

00:34:40.000 All right, here's another great thread about Google.

00:34:44.400 This is from Kanakawa and from his sub-stack.

00:34:48.220 I've mentioned him before,

00:34:50.380 if you want to look for him in Twitter.

00:34:51.580 So, he would be one of the long Twitter threads

00:34:54.840 that's as useful as Adam Townsend

00:34:59.060 or Michael Schellenberger or Matt Taibbi.

00:35:03.600 So, it's that level of high-quality journalism, I guess,

00:35:08.100 but Twitter journalism.

00:35:10.000 And I won't read it all,

00:35:11.940 but basically we know for sure

00:35:15.420 that Google manipulated search results

00:35:19.880 and manipulated things.

00:35:21.580 to hurt Trump.

00:35:23.740 So, there's a long body of evidence

00:35:25.920 that's, you know, incontrovertible at this point.

00:35:28.840 So, we know for sure

00:35:30.020 that the 2020 election,

00:35:32.820 and presumably others maybe,

00:35:34.920 were subject to huge manipulation

00:35:38.220 by both Twitter and Google.

00:35:41.780 Now, does anybody have any doubt

00:35:44.160 that manipulating those two platforms

00:35:46.840 changes an election?

00:35:47.960 Does anybody think,

00:35:49.680 oh, that won't change anything?

00:35:51.640 There's nobody who believes that, right?

00:35:53.300 And there is a professor,

00:35:54.680 I can't remember his name,

00:35:56.300 but who figured out, you know,

00:35:59.020 the ratio of how much

00:36:00.580 a biased search platform

00:36:04.220 would change your outcomes.

00:36:05.800 It would be a lot.

00:36:07.300 You know, there are things

00:36:08.080 that have just disappeared.

00:36:10.180 You know, they just can't find them

00:36:12.180 if you look for them.

00:36:12.800 So, here's what I think

00:36:16.540 Trump should do.

00:36:19.440 If you're talking about the platforms,

00:36:22.840 Twitter and Google,

00:36:23.860 and you could extend that

00:36:24.920 to some others,

00:36:26.260 is there any question

00:36:27.320 that the elections recently

00:36:29.160 have been rigged?

00:36:29.900 If you take out of the mix

00:36:34.740 the ballot counting questions

00:36:36.920 and just say,

00:36:39.840 you could just even forget that.

00:36:41.960 Do you know why I think

00:36:43.060 there's a good chance

00:36:44.080 that the elections were not rigged

00:36:46.000 in terms of the vote counting

00:36:47.740 in the ballots?

00:36:48.680 Do you know the best argument

00:36:49.900 for why the election

00:36:50.780 probably wasn't rigged?

00:36:53.140 Here it comes.

00:36:54.680 The best argument

00:36:55.680 for why the actual vote counting

00:36:57.620 was straight

00:36:59.140 is they didn't need to

00:37:01.440 because they had already

00:37:03.440 rigged the law fair,

00:37:07.000 right?

00:37:07.200 They changed the rules.

00:37:08.740 They had already rigged Google.

00:37:10.540 They had already rigged Twitter.

00:37:12.140 And they rigged the entire media.

00:37:14.660 They probably didn't need to

00:37:16.360 because all of those rigging

00:37:18.340 are apparently legal.

00:37:21.080 Am I wrong?

00:37:22.400 Everything we found out

00:37:23.580 about Google,

00:37:24.680 everything we found

00:37:25.320 about Twitter,

00:37:26.380 nobody's going to jail.

00:37:27.620 Those are just things

00:37:29.800 we wish hadn't happened.

00:37:31.500 So I think Trump,

00:37:33.340 his strongest play would be,

00:37:36.000 you know,

00:37:36.320 we should be working hard

00:37:37.960 toward more transparency

00:37:39.440 in the elections.

00:37:41.000 But you know what?

00:37:41.960 The question of whether

00:37:42.820 they counted the votes right

00:37:43.980 probably doesn't even matter

00:37:45.280 because Twitter and Google

00:37:49.240 and the media,

00:37:51.120 they largely moved the needle

00:37:53.560 more than some cheating would have.

00:37:55.380 because I don't think

00:37:56.960 you can cheat enough

00:37:58.020 in an election

00:37:59.640 to move the needle that much.

00:38:03.340 I mean,

00:38:03.500 you'd have to perfectly cheat

00:38:04.940 in just the key areas

00:38:06.880 where everybody's looking

00:38:07.900 for the cheating.

00:38:08.960 It's kind of hard.

00:38:10.720 It's kind of hard.

00:38:11.820 But the stuff they did

00:38:13.720 with the social media platforms

00:38:15.000 was easy and legal.

00:38:17.660 And the stuff that the news

00:38:19.140 lies about every day

00:38:20.280 is easy.

00:38:21.920 Lying is easy. 0.79

00:38:23.240 And legal.

00:38:24.960 The news can lie to you

00:38:26.180 all day long.

00:38:26.840 It's not even illegal.

00:38:27.780 So I think Trump should say

00:38:37.500 that the elections

00:38:38.160 have been rigged

00:38:39.240 by the social media

00:38:40.880 and the media.

00:38:43.040 And then say,

00:38:44.040 you know,

00:38:44.420 we're still looking into

00:38:45.960 whether the election itself

00:38:47.120 was rigged,

00:38:48.080 but we need more transparency there.

00:38:50.520 All he'd have to do

00:38:51.360 is tone it down

00:38:52.340 and emphasize the part

00:38:55.220 that everybody can see

00:38:56.400 with their own eyes.

00:38:57.540 It's definitely in evidence

00:38:59.480 that it was rigged

00:39:01.220 if rigging doesn't mean

00:39:03.020 miscounting the votes

00:39:04.420 and it only means

00:39:05.740 rigging the brainwashing.

00:39:08.480 So I think you can use

00:39:09.540 the word rigging

00:39:10.280 without any explanation

00:39:13.160 beyond that.

00:39:14.940 What do you think?

00:39:17.600 Yeah.

00:39:18.380 And we expect more rigging

00:39:20.000 in the future.

00:39:22.620 So Google actually had a list

00:39:24.540 of things that they were suppressing.

00:39:26.400 At the same time

00:39:27.300 that their CEO was saying,

00:39:28.540 oh, we don't do that,

00:39:29.660 they actually had a list

00:39:31.280 of websites and individuals

00:39:34.060 that they suppressed.

00:39:36.500 Absolutely did the thing

00:39:37.880 they said we absolutely don't do.

00:39:39.600 And they were doing it really hard

00:39:41.140 while saying they don't do it.

00:39:45.540 All right.

00:39:46.180 So Rasmussen says that

00:39:54.060 the majority of people

00:39:55.480 want to see a lab leak investigation

00:39:57.820 about the virus.

00:40:01.380 So two-thirds of likely U.S. voters

00:40:03.080 want to see some kind

00:40:04.520 of an investigation.

00:40:05.440 And let's say 49% say

00:40:10.480 it's very likely

00:40:11.340 that the virus came

00:40:12.400 from a lab leak.

00:40:14.260 49%.

00:40:14.700 What do you think would be

00:40:18.240 roughly the percentage

00:40:20.980 who don't think it's likely

00:40:22.380 the virus came from

00:40:23.260 the Chinese land?

00:40:25.300 Anybody want to take a guess

00:40:26.440 at that before I tell you?

00:40:27.420 I'll bet you can get it

00:40:29.600 within 5%.

00:40:30.620 We'll see if you can do it.

00:40:32.540 I'll see if you can get it

00:40:33.260 within 5%.

00:40:34.240 That'll be your test.

00:40:38.820 Looks like we lost comments

00:40:40.380 here on Locals platform.

00:40:42.960 We got a little bug,

00:40:44.060 which will now be corrected,

00:40:45.600 I think.

00:40:51.740 Nope.

00:40:53.380 Apparently not.

00:40:54.160 So it looks like Locals

00:40:56.840 is not working

00:40:57.520 at the moment.

00:40:58.620 Comments.

00:41:03.940 All right.

00:41:05.840 Sorry, Locals.

00:41:07.180 The Locals app

00:41:08.020 has crapped out.

00:41:10.160 So the video's here,

00:41:11.200 but I can't see your comments

00:41:12.240 for some fucking reason.

00:41:14.740 God damn it.

00:41:15.980 Piece of shit.

00:41:17.740 All right.

00:41:18.120 All right.

00:41:24.160 That's so annoying.

00:41:27.560 It's funny that there's

00:41:28.860 so much live streaming

00:41:30.000 and podcasting,

00:41:31.480 and there's still

00:41:32.480 no platform

00:41:33.360 that can just

00:41:35.040 live stream

00:41:36.760 and just work.

00:41:39.160 It just doesn't exist yet.

00:41:40.640 It's amazing.

00:41:42.280 All right.

00:41:43.180 I did a deep dive

00:41:45.060 into long COVID

00:41:46.020 to see what the latest is,

00:41:47.440 and here's what I determined.

00:41:49.360 Because, you know,

00:41:49.800 some people say

00:41:50.480 long COVID isn't real.

00:41:51.760 Some people say

00:41:53.100 it's not only real,

00:41:54.100 it's huge.

00:41:55.880 But I did a deep dive,

00:41:57.600 and here's what I found.

00:42:01.020 In one movie,

00:42:02.420 long COVID is totally real

00:42:04.380 and ruining lots of lives.

00:42:07.140 And many studies

00:42:08.880 support that view.

00:42:11.040 So that's in one movie.

00:42:12.740 So if you do

00:42:13.320 a Google search,

00:42:14.620 you'll find that.

00:42:15.980 That long COVID

00:42:18.080 is real,

00:42:19.140 it's affecting

00:42:19.860 a lot of people,

00:42:20.640 and it's ruining

00:42:21.220 their lives.

00:42:22.260 You can also find

00:42:23.700 studies that say

00:42:25.460 long COVID is imaginary.

00:42:27.520 And that when you

00:42:28.140 test people's vitals

00:42:29.380 that say they have

00:42:30.780 long COVID,

00:42:31.560 it kind of looks like

00:42:32.280 the average person.

00:42:34.080 So it's probably

00:42:34.820 all in their minds.

00:42:37.400 So,

00:42:38.960 these two movies

00:42:41.620 will never be reconciled.

00:42:43.340 Do you know why?

00:42:43.960 Do you know why

00:42:45.820 we'll never know

00:42:46.840 if long COVID

00:42:48.320 was devastating

00:42:49.320 a generation of people

00:42:50.460 or absolutely imaginary?

00:42:53.140 Why will we never

00:42:54.040 know that?

00:42:56.080 Because we don't

00:42:56.980 have to.

00:42:58.940 Those two movies

00:43:00.680 can live forever.

00:43:03.120 Because they're

00:43:04.120 both consistent,

00:43:05.880 and you can live

00:43:06.740 within them

00:43:07.260 without any problems.

00:43:09.660 So if you get sick

00:43:10.900 and you believe

00:43:11.560 it's long COVID,

00:43:13.200 it doesn't matter

00:43:13.900 if it is or not.

00:43:15.380 You'll just go along

00:43:16.400 with your life,

00:43:16.920 you'll tell your friend

00:43:17.660 it was long COVID,

00:43:18.940 but you'll treat it

00:43:20.220 based on the symptoms.

00:43:23.000 Whether it was

00:43:23.760 long COVID

00:43:24.360 or not long COVID,

00:43:25.320 you'd probably

00:43:25.720 treat it the same way

00:43:26.760 based on

00:43:27.760 the specific symptoms.

00:43:29.960 So the people

00:43:30.900 who will believe

00:43:31.740 they have long COVID

00:43:32.620 will go through life,

00:43:35.600 they can interact

00:43:36.680 with you,

00:43:37.580 there's no penalty

00:43:38.660 if they were wrong.

00:43:40.880 And likewise,

00:43:41.660 the people who say

00:43:42.840 there's no long COVID,

00:43:44.780 they get sick,

00:43:45.540 they go to the doctor,

00:43:47.440 the doctor says,

00:43:48.620 I think you have

00:43:49.120 long COVID,

00:43:50.500 and the other person says,

00:43:51.900 or just a headache,

00:43:54.020 and then they treat you

00:43:54.820 for the headache

00:43:55.360 or whatever it is,

00:43:56.940 and then you never

00:43:57.740 need to know

00:43:58.260 if it was long COVID.

00:44:00.120 Long COVID

00:44:00.800 never needs to be solved

00:44:02.340 because everybody

00:44:03.120 can live in a

00:44:04.200 complete movie

00:44:05.420 where it's devastating

00:44:07.740 or it's a nothing,

00:44:09.700 and somehow

00:44:12.080 we still can

00:44:13.020 procreate

00:44:14.060 and have babies,

00:44:15.160 which is all

00:44:15.760 evolution ever cared about.

00:44:20.240 Anyway,

00:44:21.120 so,

00:44:22.660 and this dovetails

00:44:23.700 with one of my critics

00:44:25.480 who was right

00:44:26.040 about everything,

00:44:27.560 Mike Hart,

00:44:28.740 and he told me

00:44:29.980 that when he looked

00:44:30.700 into the

00:44:31.460 situation

00:44:33.620 of getting vaccinated

00:44:34.720 or not,

00:44:35.260 he said,

00:44:35.800 quote,

00:44:36.480 it was simple.

00:44:38.180 It was a simple decision.

00:44:40.680 It was simple.

00:44:41.520 Because he looked

00:44:42.500 at the government

00:44:44.160 not testing the thing

00:44:45.820 as well as they could,

00:44:47.280 and then the coercion.

00:44:50.260 If you take

00:44:51.140 those two things

00:44:52.060 not tested,

00:44:53.340 you know,

00:44:53.540 it's a novel thing,

00:44:54.880 hasn't been tested enough,

00:44:56.360 and they coerce you

00:44:57.660 to take it,

00:44:59.200 it's a simple decision.

00:45:01.080 What do you think?

00:45:02.900 Agree?

00:45:03.380 It's simple.

00:45:05.780 I mean,

00:45:06.000 those two things

00:45:06.620 tell you everything you need.

00:45:07.740 And I would agree.

00:45:09.400 Because

00:45:09.840 long COVID

00:45:11.060 seemed complicated

00:45:11.940 to me,

00:45:12.860 because it was either

00:45:13.520 the biggest factor

00:45:14.420 or no factor at all.

00:45:16.160 But Mike Hart

00:45:17.180 handled that

00:45:17.880 by simply ignoring it.

00:45:21.660 And that turned out

00:45:22.620 to be the right answer.

00:45:24.540 So,

00:45:25.200 if you simply

00:45:26.520 ignored

00:45:27.000 the biggest variable

00:45:28.680 that mattered

00:45:29.480 to the decision,

00:45:30.640 because I don't think

00:45:31.180 any of us

00:45:31.600 were too worried

00:45:32.220 about dying,

00:45:33.520 the odds of dying

00:45:34.420 were actually

00:45:34.860 pretty low

00:45:35.400 for most of us.

00:45:36.840 So I wasn't worried

00:45:37.560 about dying,

00:45:39.040 but the biggest variable

00:45:40.120 this long COVID,

00:45:41.960 if you just act

00:45:43.160 like it's not even there,

00:45:45.300 it simplifies everything.

00:45:48.000 Does it?

00:45:49.600 Wouldn't you agree?

00:45:51.100 I mean,

00:45:51.320 that's as simple

00:45:51.880 as you can get.

00:45:54.100 You know,

00:45:54.340 just ignore

00:45:54.980 the biggest variable.

00:45:56.520 And if you did that

00:45:57.560 for every decision,

00:45:59.280 imagine how easy

00:46:00.380 it would be.

00:46:02.220 just ignore

00:46:03.360 the biggest factor

00:46:04.340 in every decision.

00:46:05.820 And that would

00:46:06.140 simplify everything.

00:46:08.700 It's a good recommendation.

00:46:10.560 And,

00:46:10.920 importantly,

00:46:12.240 people like Mike Hart

00:46:13.080 need to simplify

00:46:14.320 the following,

00:46:15.620 which is,

00:46:16.420 you look at

00:46:16.960 the VAERS report,

00:46:18.840 and you'd see

00:46:19.360 there's just

00:46:19.900 way tons of people

00:46:21.340 complaining about VAERS,

00:46:22.840 which would suggest

00:46:24.020 that the vaccination

00:46:25.040 itself

00:46:25.860 is causing damage

00:46:27.720 that's higher

00:46:28.500 than usual.

00:46:29.000 so it's

00:46:31.020 really simple.

00:46:31.940 You just look

00:46:32.500 at the VAERS report,

00:46:33.880 but you can

00:46:35.040 simplify it even more

00:46:36.200 by not looking

00:46:37.640 at all the studies

00:46:38.660 about long COVID.

00:46:41.160 And that simplifies it.

00:46:42.680 So if you look

00:46:43.200 at the VAERS report

00:46:44.040 and you don't look

00:46:44.960 at the

00:46:45.600 counterbalancing

00:46:47.240 risk of long COVID,

00:46:49.240 just ignore it,

00:46:51.140 everything's simpler.

00:46:52.560 And that gets you

00:46:53.220 the right answer.

00:46:53.740 So that's not the way

00:46:55.320 I would have

00:46:55.760 necessarily known to go.

00:46:57.160 I would have looked

00:46:57.660 at all the variables,

00:46:58.660 especially the biggest one.

00:47:00.320 But ignoring

00:47:01.200 the biggest variable

00:47:02.200 did get you

00:47:02.860 the best answer

00:47:04.340 and the right answer.

00:47:08.920 Very non-obvious,

00:47:11.540 and that's why

00:47:12.200 I got it all wrong.

00:47:14.720 Herd immunity.

00:47:16.500 Now this is something

00:47:17.580 I'm hearing

00:47:17.980 for the first time.

00:47:20.640 Wait,

00:47:21.340 are you saying

00:47:21.940 that a previous infection

00:47:23.480 to a virus

00:47:24.320 could give you

00:47:25.380 some kind of

00:47:25.900 natural immunity?

00:47:29.120 I'm hearing this

00:47:29.900 for the first time.

00:47:30.540 Is that true?

00:47:33.100 Because I need

00:47:33.860 somebody to tell me

00:47:34.680 that every five minutes

00:47:36.060 for the rest

00:47:37.000 of my fucking life 0.96

00:47:38.180 because I just

00:47:39.500 can't remember it

00:47:40.180 for five minutes.

00:47:43.960 Wait,

00:47:44.440 I'm forgetting it again.

00:47:46.820 Somebody needs

00:47:47.500 to remind me.

00:47:48.980 Is natural immunity

00:47:50.140 real?

00:47:51.940 All right.

00:47:55.840 Yeah,

00:47:56.660 so my bottom line

00:47:57.820 on all this is

00:47:58.800 it does appear

00:48:00.140 that the worst

00:48:01.160 conspiracy theories

00:48:02.420 about big pharma

00:48:03.980 were probably true.

00:48:05.580 Would you agree

00:48:06.140 with that?

00:48:07.200 Would you agree

00:48:07.860 that your conspiracy theories

00:48:09.580 about big pharma,

00:48:10.800 they looked like

00:48:11.860 they were completely true?

00:48:13.900 That there wasn't

00:48:14.620 enough,

00:48:15.140 not enough safety

00:48:16.420 and maybe

00:48:18.100 too much about money?

00:48:19.800 Totally true.

00:48:20.360 So pretty much

00:48:22.160 all of our

00:48:23.640 everything you suspected

00:48:26.240 except maybe chemtrails,

00:48:29.420 not so sure

00:48:31.180 about chemtrails,

00:48:32.380 but it feels like

00:48:33.580 everything you suspected

00:48:34.540 was true.

00:48:36.160 Yeah,

00:48:36.460 it's not literally true

00:48:37.560 that everything you suspected,

00:48:39.080 but it feels like it doesn't.

00:48:41.020 It actually feels

00:48:42.100 the depopulation part.

00:48:44.240 sure,

00:48:47.960 sure,

00:48:48.400 and the

00:48:49.220 WEF is

00:48:50.220 trying to

00:48:52.640 track you

00:48:54.820 and control you.

00:48:56.360 Let's accept it all.

00:48:59.240 All right,

00:49:00.080 that is all for now,

00:49:02.660 and unfortunately

00:49:03.900 I can't spend time

00:49:04.980 with the locals people

00:49:05.940 because the comments

00:49:07.120 are broken.

00:49:07.760 I haven't seen any

00:49:08.360 of your comments

00:49:08.860 in a while.

00:49:09.680 I don't know

00:49:10.040 if you can see them.

00:49:12.920 Actually,

00:49:13.500 I'm going to sign off

00:49:14.740 on YouTube

00:49:17.320 and then I'm going to see

00:49:18.180 if I can get my comments back.

00:49:20.300 And thanks for joining.

00:49:21.720 Bye for now.

00:49:23.520 Best livestream ever.

00:49:24.420 Bye for now.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - February 01, 2023

Episode 2006 Scott Adams： Lots Of Conspiracy Theories Confirmed This Year. Big Things Coming

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript