Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2017 Scott Adams： UFO News, Baby Jesus Born？ Chicken Hoaxes, Walls Not Closing In

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Coffee with Scott Adams, which is the highlight of

00:00:07.900 civilization. And today we've got some of the most interesting stories of all time.

00:00:16.100 None of them are true, but I think you're used to that. So if you'd like to get ready

00:00:21.600 for the fake news of the century, the fake news palosa. Is that something? Fake news

00:00:29.680 palosa. It's the cornucopia of fake news, and it's all here today. And if you'd like to enjoy it

00:00:36.680 to its maximum potential, all you need is a cupper mug or a glass of tanker, chalice, or

00:00:41.960 stein, a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:48.980 I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dope mean hit of the day, the thing

00:00:54.560 that makes everything better. And today, today only, a little hint of oxytocin. Just a little

00:01:01.640 bit, see if you can detect it. Ah, yeah, I got it. There's one note of oxytocin in there

00:01:11.600 today. But the dopamine is sublime, as usual. Well, I don't know if you caught it, but the

00:01:19.800 biggest story of the day is that a Japanese zoo reports that they have a female gibbon

00:01:28.560 that has given birth despite living in isolation for two years. So there were no boy gibbons anywhere 0.98

00:01:37.600 to be seen for two years. And yet, the female gibbon is pregnant. Now, this could mean one 1.00

00:01:47.520 of two things. Number one, it's a good thing I'm not an employee of that zoo. Can we all

00:01:55.220 agree it's a good thing I'm not an employee of the zoo that had the gibbon that had the

00:02:00.100 baby without any boy of gibbons? Because I'm the kind of asshole who would be mercilessly 1.00

00:02:08.220 mocking the zookeeper. So, got that female gibbon in there. She's looking kind of hot. They 1.00

00:02:16.600 tell me that no male gibbons have been in there for two years. Two years. Seems there's only 1.00

00:02:22.800 one person who has the key. Bob. Bob, you're the only person who's been in that gibbon 0.99

00:02:29.220 habitat. And I'm just saying maybe you and the gibbon got a little busy. Now, okay, you 0.98

00:02:40.260 know that didn't happen. But you know if I worked there, I would be mercilessly mocking

00:02:46.100 Bob for having access to the gibbon. Can we agree on that? It's a good thing I don't work

00:02:53.200 there. Okay, let's agree on that. The second thing is, I think we're missing the significance

00:02:59.200 because I only know one case in history in which a primate had an immaculate conception.

00:03:08.940 So, there's at least a possibility that baby Jesus has returned, but maybe was being a little

00:03:20.500 bit more modest than the last time. Now, you don't think of Jesus as like a bragger, right?

00:03:26.720 Am I right? Jesus was not like, oh, look at my Rolex. And Jesus could have had a Rolex. He

00:03:34.520 had powers. But no, Jesus is humble. If there's anything we know, Jesus is not a show-off. And

00:03:42.060 I think it would be just like him to come back as a baby gibbon. Because that would put everything 1.00

00:03:48.340 in perspective. You'd be like, oh, we're humans. We're so special. Then Jesus would come back

00:03:53.720 and say, oh, I'm not so special. I'm a gibbon. And I'm Jesus. You're like, not even that.

00:04:03.420 So, I think it would be a good lesson for humankind. Now, just so you know, a gibbon is not a monkey.

00:04:11.840 So, some of you are tempted to say, oh, it's monkey Jesus. That's, first of all, that would be

00:04:17.300 disrespectful. Second of all, it would be technically incorrect. It is a gibbon. And a gibbon, I looked

00:04:23.120 it up. They're not one of the great apes. Not a great ape. Again, totally consistent with Jesus's

00:04:30.560 personality. Jesus isn't going to come back as like a great ape. That would be not very modest, would it?

00:04:37.820 Oh, I'm the great ape. Look at me. I came back as a great ape. No, that would be so, so not in keeping

00:04:46.900 with the whole vibe. Instead, there's at least a possibility that he chose what's called the lesser

00:04:53.520 apes. The gibbons are small compared to the great apes. So, they're called the lesser apes. I think

00:05:01.460 that's perfect. I feel like that's right on brand. It's like, not too showy, but still making a point.

00:05:11.620 It makes a point without being too showy. So, I think at the exact time that the space aliens are

00:05:18.140 attacking Earth, baby gibbon Jesus may have come back. We don't know this. This is not confirmed. 0.99

00:05:24.160 But possibly, possibly, and would be, we're hoping, we're hoping baby gibbon Jesus is on our side. 0.94

00:05:34.880 Because if baby gibbon Jesus is on the alien invader side, it's going to be harder than we thought. 0.90

00:05:42.620 And Joe Biden will tell you, you're going to need more than your AR-15 for that.

00:05:47.900 You're going to need more than your AR-15 for that.

00:05:50.240 Let's talk about chickens not laying eggs. Have any of you heard that chickens stop laying eggs

00:06:01.780 because there's something in their feed that makes them non-egg layers? Well, I would ask you

00:06:12.380 to Google chickens not laying eggs and then the word debunked. Because it looks like chickens are

00:06:24.780 laying eggs. But there are always some times when some individual groups of chickens will not be

00:06:31.040 laying eggs. And individual farms could have, you know, a variety of problems that are unique to the

00:06:39.460 farm. So it's not that unusual if one farm has chickens that are not laying eggs.

00:06:45.860 It would be very unusual if they were all not laying eggs. But apparently that's not the point.

00:06:52.020 Apparently that's not happening.

00:06:53.680 So don't worry about your chicken eggs. Price is high, but there are plenty of them.

00:07:00.140 Wall Street Journal reports that the government started getting smart.

00:07:03.280 I know. You're not going to believe this story. This will be wild. You did not see this coming.

00:07:12.780 This is out of left field, people. It could be, again, related to Baby Gibbon Jesus or possibly

00:07:19.820 the alien invasion. Because this is not normal behavior. All right? Listen to this. The government

00:07:25.860 did this. Our actual government, the U.S. government. Wall Street Journal reports that the Biden

00:07:32.560 administration has started approving state requests to use Medicaid to pay for groceries

00:07:38.300 and nutritional counseling. It turns out that our government has discovered, and I think

00:07:45.700 it's true, that what you eat is related to your health. Has anybody heard that before?

00:07:53.820 This is brand new information. What you eat and how much of it could have an impact on your

00:08:01.480 health. No, no, seriously. I'm not kidding. Stop it. Stop doubting me. It's true. It's a true

00:08:09.660 fact. And what's more amazing than that, if that were not amazing enough, the U.S. government

00:08:19.660 apparently is acting rationally. And, I don't know, preliminarily, it looks like it's in the

00:08:29.780 interest of the public. Like, I don't want to get ahead of myself, but it looks like they

00:08:36.560 did something smart that's good for us. I, okay, screw it. Yeah, I don't believe it either.

00:08:44.320 Yeah. They'll find some way to take it back. But, for a moment there, I felt this little

00:08:51.340 tinge of government competence. It was, like, thrilling. It, like, went through me like a,

00:08:57.560 like a chill. Well, goosebumps. Goosebumps. Just the thought that the government would make

00:09:03.100 a good decision. Wow. But, probably not. I'm sure they'll find some way to screw that up.

00:09:09.160 Here's an amazing thing that happened on CNN today. In an opinion piece by someone who's

00:09:17.480 not a normal CNN contributor. I'm not saying that the person is not normal. I'm saying not

00:09:24.620 routinely a contributor to CNN, which is important to the story. It's Jennifer Rogers, former federal

00:09:31.940 prosecutor, is arguing that the walls are not closing in on Trump. Did you ever think you

00:09:38.580 would see that? There's an opinion piece on CNN website whose only point, there's like

00:09:47.920 one point of view. It's not like two points of view showing both sides. There's one point

00:09:52.600 of view that says the walls are not closing in on Trump. And that some recent things with,

00:09:58.980 I guess, the old prosecutor for Manhattan, I guess they're the ones that are following up

00:10:05.640 on the Stormy Daniels payment, that BS story. Not BS in terms of it not being true, but BS in terms

00:10:14.300 of nobody cares. Nobody cares. There's not a single person in the whole world who cares if Trump did or

00:10:23.560 did not use campaign funds to pay off Stormy Daniels. Zero people care. But, apparently, the

00:10:31.460 prior prosecutor wrote a book. And in the book, he gives away a little bit more information than a

00:10:40.080 prosecutor ought to be giving away. So it makes it a little bit easier for the defense to know exactly

00:10:46.260 what the worst prosecutor was thinking in terms of what the case would look like, which is just a

00:10:51.680 present to the defense. But it also showed that they seem to be wildly interested in just getting

00:10:58.300 Trump, which is a real gift to the defense. So, I don't know. The big story here is not

00:11:07.660 Trump's legal dilemma, because I think that was always trivial. What's different is that CNN

00:11:13.720 is going out of their way to say that it's trivial, and that he's moving in the direction of less risk,

00:11:20.200 not more. I've never seen that before. Have you? Have you ever seen CNN write a story with no hedging?

00:11:26.520 There's no hedging to it whatsoever. It just says, it looks like things are going his way.

00:11:32.880 It's different, right? Yeah. And I like the fact that the public is being brutal on CNN,

00:11:39.480 because I believe CNN could be a valuable asset to the country. And I think they had been in the past.

00:11:48.240 You know, they certainly went useless at some point. But I'd love to see them rehabilitated.

00:11:54.000 I'd love to know that the news, you know, was real for a change. So, we'll see. How many of you

00:12:01.380 have forgotten the Durham investigation that was supposed to be the walls closing in on, I don't

00:12:07.980 know who, Democrats and the Department of Justice and the FBI and Hillary Clinton and everybody

00:12:12.900 associated with her? And then, basically, they got kind of nothing? Do you think that's because

00:12:20.640 there was nothing there and we all got excited and there was never anything there?

00:12:27.140 So, here's what I think. I think that the Durham investigation was looking for crime.

00:12:34.460 And if your conspiracy involved, just hypothetically, just hypothetically, if a conspiracy involved

00:12:40.800 people at the Department of Justice, the FBI, lawyers, and had Democrats who mostly are lawyers,

00:12:50.920 do you think they couldn't figure out a way to do a plot without breaking any laws?

00:12:56.240 I feel like that would be easy.

00:12:59.380 Just don't write anything down in an email that's clearly illegal.

00:13:02.840 And just have all your conversations privately.

00:13:07.780 And then, everybody does things which individually look like they could have been explained

00:13:11.880 by one individual doing something they thought was the right thing to do.

00:13:16.400 That's all it would take.

00:13:18.100 So, I'm not sure that the Durham investigation tells you anything

00:13:22.200 about what did or did not happen.

00:13:24.800 The only thing that it does tell you is it was not something overtly and easily identifiable

00:13:31.060 that was illegal.

00:13:34.860 So, yeah, and all those conversations with super sketchy text stuff, that's super sketchy,

00:13:42.060 but I think it falls short of being obviously criminal.

00:13:45.840 Meaning that if there's at least one other interpretation, that's all you need.

00:13:51.220 You only need one other interpretation of the facts and you're free.

00:13:55.740 That's the whole story.

00:13:56.860 So, when they say stuff like, you know, something is an insurance policy,

00:14:02.860 that could be an indication that that person had bias, which is not illegal, is it?

00:14:12.160 Is it illegal to be a human being with bias?

00:14:15.960 As long as what you're doing is your job, no, it's not illegal to have bias.

00:14:21.340 It's illegal to act in a biased manner, but it's not illegal to have bias.

00:14:27.380 So, they would have to find that they did something that was very non-standard

00:14:32.120 and bordered on illegal to have anything.

00:14:35.840 So, I don't know that Durham finding nothing means there's nothing there.

00:14:40.500 It might mean there was nothing illegal or nothing easily found that was illegal.

00:14:44.960 Well, let's talk about those UFOs.

00:14:47.480 The funniest meme I saw in the UFO hysteria is an alien talking to another one.

00:14:55.420 And one alien says, can we land yet?

00:14:57.920 And the other alien says, no, it's too early.

00:15:00.780 At the moment, they're trying to change the weather by eating bugs.

00:15:07.380 We are kind of doing that, aren't we?

00:15:10.500 Isn't that sort of exactly what we're doing?

00:15:16.580 I believe that's actually the literal idea on the table.

00:15:21.480 To eat bugs to change the weather.

00:15:25.880 What's funny about it is that it's technically true.

00:15:29.060 It's technically true.

00:15:30.360 We're trying to eat bugs to change the weather.

00:15:32.800 That's a funny meme.

00:15:34.720 All right.

00:15:35.680 What else about this hysteria?

00:15:37.840 Yeah.

00:15:40.500 The thing I'm waiting for is when the alien leader asked to meet our leader.

00:15:47.380 And the only thing we can hope is that the advanced intelligence of this alien civilization,

00:15:53.640 I hope they have a sense of humor.

00:15:57.080 Because when we show them Biden, they're going to talk to him for five minutes,

00:16:01.460 and then they're going to turn to us and say, okay, you're joking, right?

00:16:06.620 No, seriously.

00:16:07.560 That was a pretty good one.

00:16:08.800 You got us.

00:16:09.600 We traveled from Alpha Centauri, and that was one of the best pranks we've seen.

00:16:15.840 We almost believe that was your leader.

00:16:18.960 No, seriously.

00:16:20.440 Seriously.

00:16:21.000 Show us the real one.

00:16:23.080 You know, honestly, our universal translator isn't even working on this guy.

00:16:28.040 I mean, I'm looking at the universal translator.

00:16:29.820 He talked, and I think he said, we're going to focus on the...

00:16:35.480 We don't even know what that means.

00:16:39.380 This is a universal translator.

00:16:42.300 Universal.

00:16:43.620 It doesn't work on this guy that you're pretending is your leader.

00:16:46.880 We don't know.

00:16:47.520 What are you saying?

00:16:48.320 It seems like some kind of mumble talk.

00:16:49.940 We don't know.

00:16:51.920 So that could not go well, perhaps.

00:16:56.600 Anyway, so we got an unidentified object shot down over Canada.

00:17:02.520 One shot down over Alaska.

00:17:04.600 Another one shot down over our warmer waters in the southeast.

00:17:10.140 So now we've got three objects, one definitely a Chinese spy balloon, or not, who knows.

00:17:20.240 And then two things that are mysterious.

00:17:22.680 One of them might have been a giant tube with no people and no guidance system.

00:17:29.560 How do you know there are no people in it?

00:17:31.080 If you saw a giant metallic tube flying at 40,000 feet with no windows, there's no windows,

00:17:43.620 how would you know there were no people in it?

00:17:48.900 Or aliens?

00:17:50.300 How would you know there's no aliens in there?

00:17:53.000 What mechanism do we have to know what's inside the big tube?

00:17:57.400 Or gibbons?

00:17:58.560 Or gibbons?

00:18:00.140 Yeah.

00:18:00.280 I don't know.

00:18:01.460 I feel like when they say it's unmanned, they either know it's a balloon,

00:18:07.460 because if they know it's a balloon, then they could reasonably intuit there's nothing inside it.

00:18:13.600 Right?

00:18:14.080 Depending on the size of the balloon and where it is and everything.

00:18:17.540 There's no exhaust.

00:18:19.760 So if I were to build an interplanetary wormhole traveling spaceship,

00:18:29.620 would it have windows?

00:18:32.240 And would aliens necessarily need to look at things?

00:18:35.520 Maybe aliens have a different type of way of sensing their environment.

00:18:39.900 Maybe they don't need to look at stuff with eyeballs, so they wouldn't need any windows. 0.60

00:18:45.760 Nor would they need any external propulsion signs, like smoke coming out of the engine or anything like that.

00:18:53.460 Because, my God, they just traveled interplanetary through a wormhole.

00:18:57.360 You don't need a gas engine for that, or even nuclear.

00:19:00.880 So, I don't believe that any aliens have visited us.

00:19:07.540 But I have questions.

00:19:09.880 Number one, why did the U.S. shoot down an object over Canadian airspace?

00:19:16.320 Now, it's reported that we were coordinating with the Canadian government.

00:19:22.100 But, why do we shoot things down over Canada?

00:19:27.360 Even with permission?

00:19:29.720 Is that because Canada doesn't have any air force that can shoot down a balloon?

00:19:36.200 Now, I get that NORAD is up there, and they saw it, and blah, blah, blah, blah.

00:19:43.260 And I get that we have better military assets, perhaps.

00:19:49.480 Maybe.

00:19:51.900 NORAD is joint U.S.-Canada.

00:19:54.800 It is?

00:19:56.120 NORAD is joint U.S.-Canada?

00:19:58.180 Well, NORAD is just the monitoring, right?

00:20:00.740 But when you put the actual jet up, I'm just wondering, why would Trudeau allow an American pilot to save Canada if Canada has pilots and missiles?

00:20:16.320 What's behind that?

00:20:18.440 He requested it.

00:20:20.400 Here's my theory.

00:20:23.520 As you know, Trudeau only looks for opportunities where he can look weak.

00:20:31.500 Am I right?

00:20:34.000 The Trudeau is always looking for a way to look weak and feminine. 1.00

00:20:38.660 The best way that Canada could look weak and feminine is to say, oh, could you help us with this UFO? 0.65

00:20:49.220 We don't think we can handle it with her.

00:20:52.100 Oh, we have jets.

00:20:53.000 Yeah, we have jets.

00:20:53.980 But could you handle this?

00:20:55.800 Maybe you could do this one.

00:20:57.920 How about you do this one?

00:20:59.580 Oh, you do this one.

00:21:01.400 We'll do the next one.

00:21:02.620 You do this one.

00:21:04.440 I feel like it was the most feminine thing Canada could do, to ask for help from the big, strong neighbor.

00:21:12.220 Oh, could you lift this?

00:21:14.080 Oh, we could do it.

00:21:15.040 Oh, yeah, we could do it ourselves.

00:21:16.100 But we'd have to stand on a chair.

00:21:18.520 Could you do it?

00:21:19.320 You look so big and strong.

00:21:20.480 How would you like to be a Canadian today?

00:21:26.040 How would you like to be male and Canadian today?

00:21:28.880 And not feeling so strong today, are you?

00:21:35.340 I'm sorry, Canada.

00:21:36.920 We love Canada.

00:21:38.940 But your leader, he's fun to mock.

00:21:43.860 All right.

00:21:46.420 What else is going on?

00:21:49.740 You may have done what I did, which is click on the UFO links on Twitter today.

00:21:56.000 Did you see how many UFO sightings there are, according to Twitter?

00:21:59.220 Now, I recognize some of them as being, you know, old ones, and they look like hoaxes and stuff.

00:22:06.540 So here's the thing I can guarantee you.

00:22:09.660 95% of everything you see on these UFO stories is just made up.

00:22:15.240 Would you agree?

00:22:17.400 Whatever is true, I don't know.

00:22:19.940 But at a minimum, at a minimum, 95% of everything you see is just made up.

00:22:24.720 So if you see a picture of a UFO, if you see a video, and even if it looks like it was taken from the space shuttle,

00:22:33.220 and even if it looks like there's a ship landing on the moon, which we saw this morning,

00:22:39.120 no matter what you see, there's a 95% chance it's not true, no matter the source.

00:22:46.280 No matter the source.

00:22:47.400 Now, I'm allowing 5%, which is pretty big, if you're talking about, you know, aliens visiting the Earth.

00:22:55.980 5% is really big.

00:22:57.780 I'm just allowing that, you know, anything's possible.

00:23:02.200 Anything is possible.

00:23:03.700 So I'm not going to rule it out, but I wouldn't believe any of the pictures.

00:23:08.500 So don't believe any videos or any pictures.

00:23:12.040 That would be my advice.

00:23:13.060 All right.

00:23:17.860 So now there are pictures of cylinders flying everywhere.

00:23:23.400 Now, unfortunately, a cylindrical tube is the easiest thing to fake if you're going to do, like, Photoshop or a fake video.

00:23:35.400 Yeah, I'm trusting the experts again.

00:23:38.080 Exactly.

00:23:38.560 So anyway, let me ask the audience.

00:23:47.380 How many of you believe, literally, that space aliens are here?

00:23:53.160 Go.

00:23:53.960 How many of you believe it?

00:23:55.520 Like, just say yes, I believe that these are actual space aliens.

00:24:00.960 Oh, it's all no's. 1.00

00:24:02.500 I saw one yes.

00:24:06.020 They're on the way?

00:24:06.920 All right, a few yeses, but mostly no's.

00:24:09.760 All right, that's good.

00:24:10.880 That's good.

00:24:13.660 You know what?

00:24:15.220 Imagine if we had not experienced five straight years of nothing but fake news.

00:24:21.080 If you had not been trained and primed by fake news of every type,

00:24:27.180 would you be more likely to think there was an alien invasion?

00:24:29.940 I feel like we were protected by fake news.

00:24:37.100 The fake news acted as a...

00:24:39.780 What's the word I'm going to use?

00:24:41.720 Fill in my word.

00:24:43.440 Because we had so much fake news, we were primed and, let's say, protected from, let's say,

00:24:49.320 thoughts of a mass hysteria of UFOs invading.

00:24:53.580 A vaccine.

00:24:54.760 That's right.

00:24:55.460 Fake news acted as a vaccine so that almost all of you don't believe there's an alien invasion.

00:25:03.120 That's a real thing.

00:25:05.280 Just think about that for a moment.

00:25:07.300 If you had not been primed by five years of fake news, just obviously fake news,

00:25:12.340 you might have actually believed this was an alien invasion.

00:25:17.180 But now you're all so battle-worn and experienced that you know just because it's in the news

00:25:25.460 and just because you saw a video and just because you saw a picture

00:25:29.700 and just because you saw credible people talking to you on TV, that doesn't mean anything.

00:25:36.120 In 2023, what is the news value of a credible person telling you something happened that you can't verify?

00:25:45.940 Zero.

00:25:47.540 Zero.

00:25:49.340 Zero.

00:25:50.720 It doesn't matter how credible they are because everybody's lying on TV.

00:25:55.500 Every side, every issue, everybody's lying on TV.

00:25:57.940 So, it's kind of good that I think the public is treating the UFO stories and the balloon stories,

00:26:08.220 I think we're treating it as pure entertainment, which is exactly how we should treat it.

00:26:14.580 Am I right?

00:26:16.660 When I look at the UFO stuff, I don't see it as news per se.

00:26:20.620 I see it as just entertainment.

00:26:22.880 I don't think it has any impact on anything.

00:26:25.640 I think that probably there have always been balloon-like things floating around up there,

00:26:31.400 and countries are now just shooting them down to look tough.

00:26:34.920 Or in the case of Canada, they're asking their big manly neighbor to shoot it down

00:26:39.940 so that they can remain feminine.

00:26:42.960 And by the way, that is what's happening in Canada.

00:26:45.540 Am I right?

00:26:47.400 Mexico is becoming more male. 0.96

00:26:50.640 Canada is becoming more female in attitude, not gender.

00:26:54.240 And the United States is in the middle, and we're being, like, rocked by both of those things.

00:27:00.420 It's true.

00:27:03.040 Mexico's your dad. 0.99

00:27:05.020 Canada's your mom. 0.96

00:27:06.980 And America is trying to figure it out.

00:27:10.260 Like the two or three confused children of those two parents.

00:27:14.820 That's what it feels like.

00:27:15.900 All right, so don't believe anything on aliens.

00:27:20.120 Do you believe that there's a, I don't know, another country threat?

00:27:29.320 Eric writes, says, for $25 on his super chat, he says,

00:27:33.800 looks to me like Operation Space Boner is going way better than China was expecting.

00:27:38.460 Well, I don't know what it all means.

00:27:44.800 But do you remember when Jesus was born, there was like a north star,

00:27:51.980 and then the three wise men followed it?

00:27:54.600 And they knew that the star was a sign that, you know, the Lord would be born.

00:27:59.860 But just before this baby gibbon had its immaculate conception,

00:28:07.060 in the sky we were talking about two things.

00:28:10.160 One thing shaped like a big egg,

00:28:13.380 the Chinese spy balloon shaped like a big egg,

00:28:15.800 and the other thing shaped like a big penis. 0.80

00:28:19.220 So in the sky, three wise men, I have to be at least one of them.

00:28:24.240 Are there two other wise men to join me?

00:28:26.240 And we'll open it to wise non-binaries too. 1.00

00:28:30.500 Women, you can be wise women and wise non-binaries. 1.00

00:28:34.220 Anything you like.

00:28:36.000 But I saw the signs.

00:28:38.100 I saw the big egg in the sky and the big penis.

00:28:40.820 And I knew that baby gibbon Jesus was being born in a Japanese zoo. 0.98

00:28:46.840 That's how I knew.

00:28:48.200 It was sort of obvious if you put the pieces together.

00:28:51.820 All right.

00:28:52.460 My ongoing conversation indirectly with Brett Weinstein and Heather Heyer continues.

00:29:00.860 I think they mentioned something on their podcast.

00:29:03.440 I haven't heard it yet.

00:29:05.460 But somebody was arguing their side

00:29:08.160 and said that the fact that some people can consistently win at poker

00:29:12.820 is evidence that Brett Weinstein could figure out what was right

00:29:20.840 or what was wrong about vaccinations and the pandemic

00:29:24.140 because it's possible to consistently win at poker, but only some people.

00:29:31.500 So if some people can consistently win at poker,

00:29:34.880 therefore, logically, some people could do what Brett and Heather did,

00:29:39.560 but not everybody.

00:29:41.920 Because not everybody can win at poker,

00:29:44.180 but some people can do it consistently,

00:29:46.000 which shows they have a method.

00:29:47.780 Right?

00:29:48.100 If you can do it consistently and it's predictable,

00:29:50.960 that means you have a method.

00:29:53.600 So if Brett can do his thing consistently,

00:29:56.180 that would be a method,

00:29:57.400 and therefore the poker thing proves the point.

00:30:01.000 How many people accept that strong point?

00:30:06.980 Strong point?

00:30:10.420 John says good point.

00:30:13.340 Scott always mispronounces names.

00:30:15.400 That's true.

00:30:16.860 Weinstein and Weinstein,

00:30:18.420 I will never,

00:30:19.760 I promise you I'll never get them straight.

00:30:21.720 And that's on me.

00:30:22.820 That's on me.

00:30:23.760 But I know my limitations.

00:30:25.620 Statistics are a thing, right?

00:30:32.420 All right.

00:30:33.360 So here's the real answer.

00:30:36.960 Poker is an analogy.

00:30:41.040 There's no logic there.

00:30:43.620 There's no logic whatsoever.

00:30:45.780 It's just a story that reminds you of another story.

00:30:49.320 That's all that is.

00:30:50.920 It's a story that reminds you of another story in some way.

00:30:53.940 There's no logic connection at all.

00:30:58.540 Now, let me tell you why the poker analogy doesn't fit.

00:31:02.760 Had it been a good analogy,

00:31:05.160 then it wouldn't matter that it was about poker or anything else.

00:31:08.420 A good analogy might have actually moved things forward.

00:31:13.240 Here's what's wrong with the analogy.

00:31:16.680 Poker is a bounded game with rules.

00:31:21.180 There are just so many things you can do in poker,

00:31:23.320 and that's the only things you can do.

00:31:25.520 You cannot do anything but what the game allows you to do.

00:31:29.040 Now, when you're looking at a bounded set of possibilities,

00:31:33.320 it is quite possible that somebody could figure out a tell or a pattern

00:31:38.340 in which this bounded set of possibilities

00:31:41.020 always operates a certain way, let's say, on average.

00:31:46.020 However, the real world is not a bounded game.

00:31:51.340 The real world has infinite possibilities.

00:31:54.620 So if you compare something where somebody could conquer a limited set of possibilities,

00:32:00.100 you have said absolutely nothing about the real world with unlimited possibilities.

00:32:05.680 In fact, you've proven that the only place you can do it

00:32:10.660 is where the possibilities are bounded.

00:32:14.240 That actually works against the point.

00:32:18.740 If the point is, I can do things in this domain

00:32:22.120 when there's infinite possibilities

00:32:24.380 and new information that could come in, etc.,

00:32:26.860 you can't compare them.

00:32:28.620 So if you fell for that,

00:32:32.280 if when I first described it, you said to yourself,

00:32:34.560 well, that's a good point.

00:32:36.040 Some poker players can win,

00:32:37.440 so therefore maybe Brett has those skills,

00:32:39.960 he's just applied them in a different domain.

00:32:42.020 If you bought that,

00:32:44.640 I hope you learned something.

00:32:46.980 Never compare a bounded set of options

00:32:49.580 to an infinite set of options.

00:32:51.960 It's a real basic comparison mistake.

00:32:57.060 Now, I tell you over and over again

00:32:59.320 that my skill that I learned in two college courses,

00:33:04.280 I know you hate it when I say that,

00:33:06.660 but it is how to compare things.

00:33:09.360 Like I've learned and had jobs

00:33:12.060 in which my only job was to compare the correct two things.

00:33:16.840 So when I tell you that I see people in the wild

00:33:19.780 comparing the wrong things,

00:33:22.560 I'm the expert.

00:33:24.720 So if I see a scientist comparing two things

00:33:27.240 that are obviously the wrong things to compare,

00:33:30.220 I'm the expert.

00:33:32.220 I'm the expert,

00:33:33.440 not the person who made the wrong comparison.

00:33:36.400 For example,

00:33:37.880 some people said,

00:33:39.120 I looked at the risk of the vaccines

00:33:40.640 and made my decision.

00:33:43.260 Anybody who understands decision-making

00:33:45.420 knows that that was an irrational process.

00:33:47.600 Because what you have to compare it to

00:33:49.960 is the other risks,

00:33:51.180 and those were unknown.

00:33:55.600 All right.

00:33:58.060 So that happened.

00:34:01.140 How many of you are bored at CGI movies?

00:34:06.620 Because they all start looking the same.

00:34:09.280 Do you remember when you saw Star Wars

00:34:11.140 for the first time,

00:34:12.020 if you're old enough to remember that?

00:34:14.200 When Star Wars was brand new,

00:34:16.680 the very first one,

00:34:18.800 it was just mind-boggling.

00:34:21.400 Your eyes never shut.

00:34:23.280 You're like,

00:34:23.640 oh, how'd they do that?

00:34:26.000 And then it got better and better

00:34:27.400 until it was Iron Man

00:34:29.000 and all the Marvel stuff.

00:34:31.980 And the first Iron Man was pretty amazing.

00:34:36.060 The first Superman movies,

00:34:39.240 pretty good.

00:34:40.920 Pretty good.

00:34:41.460 But now if I watch a superhero movie,

00:34:44.840 I watched Black Adam recently.

00:34:48.120 Watching it, I think, is an exaggeration.

00:34:50.520 I sort of had it on

00:34:51.620 while I was doing something else.

00:34:53.840 And it was unwatchable.

00:34:56.880 The CGI was, I guess, amazing.

00:35:00.400 But it started to look like every other movie.

00:35:03.740 All right, there's a guy in a tight costume,

00:35:06.760 and he put his hand out,

00:35:08.140 and some stuff came from his hand

00:35:10.440 and made that thing blow up again.

00:35:13.520 Right?

00:35:13.920 So I can't,

00:35:14.720 I don't even watch when I,

00:35:17.160 you know,

00:35:17.400 if I try to watch an action movie,

00:35:19.560 I fast-forward through the CGI.

00:35:22.320 Do you do that?

00:35:23.800 I fast-forward through all the action

00:35:25.640 because it's just boring.

00:35:27.680 It looks like every other movie I've seen.

00:35:29.580 And then I get to the,

00:35:30.860 maybe a dialogue.

00:35:32.700 But if it's a dialogue

00:35:33.880 where it's two characters

00:35:35.340 who are trying to act romantically interested,

00:35:38.080 fast-forward,

00:35:39.440 because there's nothing worse

00:35:40.460 than the movie trying to convince you

00:35:42.560 that the two people love each other

00:35:44.000 so that you'll feel extra bad

00:35:45.900 when one of them dies

00:35:46.880 or is in danger.

00:35:49.200 And I think,

00:35:49.800 no, I don't want to feel extra bad.

00:35:51.400 I don't want to be invested

00:35:52.620 in that character.

00:35:53.420 Fast-forward.

00:35:54.500 Let's just see the funny jokes.

00:35:56.600 And then I'll go to the dialogue

00:35:57.720 where the, you know,

00:35:59.180 the hero is just saying

00:36:01.240 clever retorts.

00:36:03.100 And I'll go,

00:36:04.060 oh, that was good.

00:36:04.900 Clever retort.

00:36:06.040 I could watch that.

00:36:08.360 But here's where this is all going.

00:36:09.940 It's not about movies.

00:36:11.680 As you know,

00:36:12.640 AI can make art

00:36:13.860 and it can do it instantly.

00:36:15.960 And in my opinion,

00:36:17.120 it's already way better than humans.

00:36:19.340 Not even close,

00:36:20.300 in my opinion.

00:36:21.340 Now, remember,

00:36:23.260 I'm an artist.

00:36:25.380 Sort of.

00:36:27.140 Sort of.

00:36:28.560 I'm kind of,

00:36:29.440 kind of almost an artist.

00:36:31.160 Cartoonist.

00:36:32.280 Cartoonist.

00:36:33.120 That counts a little bit.

00:36:34.940 A little bit.

00:36:36.220 And in my opinion,

00:36:37.940 AI art is already better

00:36:39.420 than human art by far.

00:36:43.040 And here's what's going to happen.

00:36:44.480 It's going to go the way of CGI.

00:36:47.720 When I looked at examples

00:36:49.660 of AI art,

00:36:51.820 the first time I saw it,

00:36:53.020 I was like,

00:36:53.560 whoa.

00:36:54.960 Just like I did

00:36:55.960 the first time I saw CGI.

00:36:58.580 Whoa.

00:36:59.060 That is amazing.

00:37:01.160 Second time,

00:37:02.420 same thing.

00:37:03.280 Hundredth time,

00:37:04.320 same thing.

00:37:05.400 But already,

00:37:07.400 it's starting to look

00:37:08.540 like not special.

00:37:12.320 Because once you've seen

00:37:13.420 your thousandth

00:37:14.580 really,

00:37:15.800 really good

00:37:16.560 AI art,

00:37:19.200 it just

00:37:19.840 looks like

00:37:21.020 things are supposed

00:37:21.720 to look like that.

00:37:22.860 If you can make something

00:37:24.100 that looks like that,

00:37:25.200 why isn't everybody doing it?

00:37:26.600 It's free.

00:37:27.040 It's instant.

00:37:28.660 So,

00:37:29.300 I think we're getting

00:37:30.580 to the point

00:37:31.040 where visual art,

00:37:33.680 and I'm going to go further,

00:37:36.300 all art

00:37:37.700 will become meaningless

00:37:39.080 very quickly.

00:37:41.980 Probably ten years,

00:37:43.440 but

00:37:43.640 maybe five.

00:37:46.100 Because movies

00:37:47.160 are no longer

00:37:48.160 interesting.

00:37:50.000 And it's going to go

00:37:51.100 the same way.

00:37:51.640 Now,

00:37:53.260 somebody gave me

00:37:54.180 an analogy

00:37:55.420 with this.

00:37:56.580 And as I said,

00:37:57.500 analogies are useless.

00:37:58.960 Somebody said,

00:37:59.460 well,

00:37:59.760 the radio didn't go away

00:38:01.020 when television came in.

00:38:02.940 No.

00:38:04.440 Radio and television

00:38:05.560 were a very

00:38:06.560 small addition

00:38:08.340 to our

00:38:08.980 mental load.

00:38:10.860 Like,

00:38:11.280 it was just something

00:38:11.920 you made a point

00:38:13.060 to look at it

00:38:13.680 once in a while.

00:38:14.960 So,

00:38:15.220 it was always

00:38:15.540 like an exception

00:38:16.280 and special

00:38:17.040 and stuff like that.

00:38:18.140 So,

00:38:18.380 radio was still

00:38:19.040 special.

00:38:20.600 TV was special.

00:38:21.520 But you didn't get

00:38:22.160 too much of either one.

00:38:23.960 Even if you watched

00:38:24.640 a few hours a day,

00:38:25.500 you didn't get

00:38:26.100 that much of either one.

00:38:27.560 But AI will just

00:38:28.660 be everywhere.

00:38:30.500 Like,

00:38:30.800 every piece of art,

00:38:32.600 every piece

00:38:33.720 of entertainment,

00:38:34.960 it'll just be

00:38:35.660 AI created

00:38:36.620 and better than

00:38:37.400 anything

00:38:37.720 that humans

00:38:38.480 can make,

00:38:39.080 eventually.

00:38:39.640 Not yet,

00:38:40.260 but eventually.

00:38:41.700 And you will

00:38:42.780 just get bored.

00:38:44.360 Because everything

00:38:46.080 will be excellent.

00:38:48.740 The reason

00:38:49.760 that art

00:38:50.520 is,

00:38:52.460 you know,

00:38:52.820 special

00:38:53.280 is because

00:38:54.600 it's rare.

00:38:56.400 The reason

00:38:57.200 human art

00:38:57.820 is special

00:38:58.280 is that it's rare.

00:38:59.700 But as soon as

00:39:00.680 AI can make

00:39:02.580 as much as you want

00:39:03.580 for free,

00:39:04.360 it's not rare,

00:39:05.840 and you're going

00:39:06.460 to see it everywhere.

00:39:08.000 It's just going

00:39:08.580 to be everywhere.

00:39:09.680 And you'll be

00:39:10.840 surprised

00:39:11.740 when something

00:39:12.380 doesn't look amazing.

00:39:13.440 it'll, like,

00:39:14.640 stand out.

00:39:15.780 And you'll say

00:39:16.340 to yourself,

00:39:17.220 why did you

00:39:19.020 put this advertisement

00:39:20.260 in this publication

00:39:21.800 when all you had

00:39:23.320 to do is

00:39:23.740 push two buttons

00:39:24.700 and AI could have

00:39:25.620 fixed this for you

00:39:26.400 and it was free?

00:39:27.600 Like,

00:39:27.960 anything that isn't

00:39:29.320 excellent

00:39:29.840 will just look

00:39:31.860 like a mistake.

00:39:33.500 So it'll all

00:39:34.160 be excellent.

00:39:35.400 Yeah.

00:39:35.820 So I think

00:39:36.300 all art

00:39:36.920 will actually

00:39:37.720 go away. 0.82

00:39:39.120 art

00:39:41.460 will go away

00:39:42.960 because it can

00:39:44.220 only exist

00:39:45.200 as an exception.

00:39:47.580 Does that make sense?

00:39:49.680 Once there's

00:39:50.440 no such thing

00:39:51.140 as, oh,

00:39:51.620 this one is special,

00:39:52.820 it's just everywhere.

00:39:54.580 Every advertisement

00:39:55.500 is art,

00:39:56.320 every building

00:39:57.080 will be art,

00:39:58.240 every design

00:39:58.920 will be art,

00:39:59.720 every TV show

00:40:00.540 will be AI,

00:40:01.720 and it'll be

00:40:02.160 pretty good.

00:40:03.580 It just,

00:40:04.200 nothing will seem

00:40:05.300 special or interesting.

00:40:06.300 And I think

00:40:08.120 there's probably

00:40:08.620 a biological reason

00:40:09.940 why we're built

00:40:10.560 this way.

00:40:11.880 I believe

00:40:12.380 we are

00:40:12.820 biologically designed

00:40:14.360 to identify

00:40:16.860 a genetic

00:40:18.140 advantage

00:40:18.720 in another human.

00:40:20.720 That makes sense,

00:40:21.760 right?

00:40:22.660 We are genetically

00:40:23.540 evolved,

00:40:24.620 that we can see,

00:40:25.900 oh,

00:40:26.180 that person can

00:40:26.960 shoot a basketball

00:40:27.720 really well.

00:40:28.600 I want to mate

00:40:29.240 with that person.

00:40:30.380 That person is

00:40:31.140 really smart.

00:40:32.480 I want to mate

00:40:32.940 with them.

00:40:33.580 That person can

00:40:34.480 create art.

00:40:35.280 I want to mate

00:40:36.560 with them.

00:40:38.580 So we can spot

00:40:40.400 exceptionalism

00:40:41.780 anywhere.

00:40:42.920 And I often think

00:40:44.120 that when we're

00:40:44.620 looking at art,

00:40:46.040 we're actually

00:40:47.160 thinking about

00:40:48.020 the mating potential

00:40:49.280 of the creator,

00:40:50.960 even though we're

00:40:51.500 not directly

00:40:52.320 thinking of it.

00:40:53.120 That's the thing

00:40:53.980 that's triggering us,

00:40:55.160 is the mating potential

00:40:56.240 of the creator,

00:40:57.660 that they created

00:40:58.300 something amazing.

00:40:59.600 Now,

00:40:59.880 the art itself

00:41:00.560 can also be

00:41:01.600 breathtaking.

00:41:03.200 So let me not

00:41:04.140 take away from the art.

00:41:05.280 The art can be

00:41:06.140 breathtaking.

00:41:07.340 But the only reason

00:41:08.200 we respond to it

00:41:09.420 is that we're

00:41:10.640 seeing a genetic

00:41:12.140 greatness coming

00:41:13.460 through the art.

00:41:14.780 That's my hypothesis.

00:41:17.600 I do think humor

00:41:18.880 will be the last

00:41:20.020 thing that goes

00:41:21.020 to AI,

00:41:22.560 but that when it

00:41:23.600 does,

00:41:23.980 it will be instant.

00:41:26.560 Humor will not

00:41:27.560 go slowly.

00:41:28.620 The moment AI

00:41:30.860 can do humor,

00:41:33.360 it will do it

00:41:34.080 like it will

00:41:35.640 replace people,

00:41:36.860 basically.

00:41:39.640 But we don't know

00:41:40.500 when that will happen.

00:41:41.300 Could happen soon.

00:41:43.300 All right,

00:41:43.780 here's something.

00:41:46.960 I want to see

00:41:47.480 if I can get

00:41:47.920 your agreement on it.

00:41:51.080 You can't sell

00:41:52.480 any idea to the public

00:41:53.960 until they get

00:41:55.740 a little bit

00:41:56.280 used to it.

00:41:58.540 Would you agree

00:41:59.320 with that?

00:42:00.140 That you can't

00:42:01.160 introduce a brand

00:42:02.060 new idea to the

00:42:03.140 public because

00:42:03.820 we reflexively

00:42:06.740 reject anything

00:42:08.520 new.

00:42:09.600 Would you agree?

00:42:10.820 Not every person,

00:42:12.260 not every human,

00:42:13.120 not every situation,

00:42:14.380 but as a public,

00:42:16.420 we reject everything

00:42:17.920 new the first time

00:42:19.100 you hear it.

00:42:19.600 But over time,

00:42:21.280 would you agree

00:42:22.380 that if you hear

00:42:23.680 an idea enough,

00:42:25.120 it starts to make sense?

00:42:27.340 Do you remember

00:42:27.980 the first time

00:42:28.540 you heard about

00:42:29.180 reparations for slavery?

00:42:31.860 The first time.

00:42:34.280 Did you say,

00:42:35.220 well, that's not

00:42:35.720 going to happen.

00:42:37.060 Nobody's going

00:42:37.660 to take that seriously.

00:42:39.200 Right?

00:42:39.620 But then you just

00:42:40.360 kept hearing it

00:42:41.180 and hearing it

00:42:41.880 and hearing it

00:42:42.460 and now there are

00:42:43.460 committees looking

00:42:44.960 into a formula

00:42:46.040 for it.

00:42:47.780 Like suddenly,

00:42:48.740 it went from

00:42:49.540 a ridiculous idea

00:42:50.820 to it just got

00:42:52.420 socialized

00:42:53.300 and became part

00:42:54.200 of the fabric

00:42:54.780 and now it's normal.

00:42:57.160 Think back to

00:42:58.340 when you first

00:43:00.000 heard that Trump

00:43:01.760 had privately

00:43:02.620 asked his defense

00:43:03.960 secretary, I think,

00:43:05.460 about the option

00:43:06.380 of attacking

00:43:08.240 the cartels

00:43:09.000 directly, militarily.

00:43:10.740 Do you remember

00:43:11.320 what your first

00:43:12.220 reaction was?

00:43:14.120 Holy cow, 0.51

00:43:15.620 you can't do that.

00:43:17.000 That would be

00:43:17.460 an invasion of Mexico.

00:43:18.720 That's not going

00:43:19.160 to happen.

00:43:19.540 And the news

00:43:20.960 treated it

00:43:21.680 like Trump

00:43:22.780 was basically

00:43:23.420 a crazy person.

00:43:25.300 Right?

00:43:26.620 Well,

00:43:27.640 I brought up

00:43:29.560 the idea

00:43:30.040 a number of times

00:43:30.860 and when I brought

00:43:31.920 it up initially,

00:43:33.160 I got the same

00:43:34.280 response,

00:43:35.760 which is,

00:43:36.400 yeah,

00:43:38.180 no,

00:43:38.640 you can't attack

00:43:40.200 your neighboring

00:43:40.700 country.

00:43:41.580 You can't do that.

00:43:43.380 How about now?

00:43:44.180 How about today?

00:43:46.620 Today it's an option,

00:43:49.760 isn't it?

00:43:51.080 It's an absolute option.

00:43:53.180 And politicians

00:43:54.520 are talking about it

00:43:55.500 out loud.

00:43:57.020 It's actually being

00:43:58.000 discussed out loud

00:43:59.740 by traditional

00:44:01.240 politicians.

00:44:04.640 That's where we need

00:44:08.200 to get to get

00:44:09.540 anything done

00:44:10.160 about the border

00:44:11.480 and about fentanyl.

00:44:12.500 You have to get

00:44:13.520 to the point

00:44:13.920 where it feels

00:44:15.000 normal

00:44:15.540 that our military

00:44:17.440 would take out

00:44:18.400 the cartels.

00:44:19.860 And it's getting there.

00:44:21.700 So I was asking

00:44:22.660 these provocative

00:44:24.060 questions on Twitter

00:44:25.680 and let me start

00:44:27.860 by saying

00:44:28.340 I do not recommend

00:44:29.640 vigilantism

00:44:30.700 or killing anybody.

00:44:32.700 So I do not

00:44:33.880 recommend violence.

00:44:34.960 I'm just predicting.

00:44:36.840 Predicting.

00:44:37.320 If things get worse

00:44:39.160 with fentanyl

00:44:39.900 sooner or later

00:44:41.840 a bunch of dads

00:44:42.780 with ARs

00:44:43.660 are going to

00:44:44.200 surround a fentanyl

00:44:45.480 dealer's house

00:44:46.120 and light it up.

00:44:47.720 It's going to happen.

00:44:49.440 Sooner or later.

00:44:50.840 And it's going to

00:44:51.780 feel like

00:44:52.360 there was a good

00:44:54.180 reason for it.

00:44:56.020 Now

00:44:56.380 when I asked

00:44:58.180 when I was

00:44:59.580 provocatively saying

00:45:00.880 can an American

00:45:02.000 citizen

00:45:02.580 kill

00:45:03.920 a member

00:45:04.720 of the cartel

00:45:05.520 if they find

00:45:06.280 them on American

00:45:06.960 soil

00:45:07.340 even if

00:45:08.660 they're not

00:45:09.040 in the act

00:45:09.700 of threatening

00:45:10.200 anybody.

00:45:11.240 Can you just

00:45:11.860 kill them

00:45:12.380 for being

00:45:12.980 an enemy

00:45:13.620 invader

00:45:14.780 on your land

00:45:15.820 in a hot war?

00:45:18.780 And almost

00:45:19.460 everybody said

00:45:20.260 yes.

00:45:22.500 Think about that.

00:45:24.680 I asked

00:45:25.680 if Americans

00:45:26.460 should be allowed

00:45:27.440 to kill

00:45:28.440 fentanyl

00:45:30.640 dealers

00:45:31.000 and let's

00:45:32.340 say cartel

00:45:33.060 members

00:45:33.460 on American

00:45:34.440 soil

00:45:34.780 if they're

00:45:35.480 not actively

00:45:36.460 threatening

00:45:37.060 somebody

00:45:37.460 at that

00:45:37.800 moment.

00:45:38.620 And a lot

00:45:39.000 of people

00:45:39.280 said absolutely.

00:45:40.740 Yeah you

00:45:41.040 could kill

00:45:41.380 that person.

00:45:42.520 That would

00:45:42.800 be self

00:45:43.320 defense

00:45:43.820 in every

00:45:44.520 definition.

00:45:46.940 Now in

00:45:47.200 my opinion

00:45:48.120 it should

00:45:48.660 be legal.

00:45:50.480 So I

00:45:51.120 don't recommend

00:45:51.760 it because

00:45:52.140 I don't think

00:45:52.700 it's legal.

00:45:54.220 But in my

00:45:54.840 opinion we

00:45:55.540 should change

00:45:56.060 the law

00:45:56.460 and make

00:45:56.820 that legal

00:45:57.360 because it's

00:45:58.520 going to

00:45:58.720 happen anyway.

00:46:00.680 You just

00:46:01.280 have to make

00:46:01.720 sure the dads

00:46:02.320 get pushed

00:46:02.800 far enough.

00:46:03.380 You know

00:46:04.460 what I

00:46:04.620 mean?

00:46:05.120 And by

00:46:05.620 the way

00:46:05.860 this is a

00:46:06.440 case where

00:46:06.900 I'm not

00:46:07.260 going to

00:46:07.440 say internet

00:46:08.540 dads includes

00:46:09.720 women and 0.99

00:46:10.500 everybody else.

00:46:11.940 This does

00:46:12.640 not include

00:46:13.140 women. 0.81

00:46:14.560 If ever

00:46:15.540 there's this

00:46:16.060 situation and

00:46:16.820 I predict

00:46:17.280 it will

00:46:17.520 happen I

00:46:17.960 don't

00:46:18.140 recommend it

00:46:18.800 I don't

00:46:19.760 promote it

00:46:20.360 don't

00:46:20.700 recommend it

00:46:21.360 but the

00:46:22.600 government has

00:46:23.280 checked out.

00:46:24.860 The government

00:46:25.300 is allowing

00:46:25.940 the invasion

00:46:26.800 to happen.

00:46:29.840 It looks like

00:46:30.360 they're promoting

00:46:30.900 it.

00:46:32.100 So I

00:46:32.460 mean their

00:46:32.780 actions would

00:46:33.420 suggest that

00:46:33.980 they want it

00:46:34.540 rather than

00:46:35.020 they want to

00:46:35.500 stop it.

00:46:36.700 So I think

00:46:37.620 that the

00:46:38.140 inevitable outcome

00:46:39.240 of that will

00:46:40.680 be there will

00:46:41.140 be enough

00:46:41.540 people who

00:46:42.000 have personally

00:46:42.640 lost somebody

00:46:43.340 to fentanyl

00:46:44.020 that they're

00:46:45.040 just going to

00:46:45.520 surround a

00:46:46.660 deal or location

00:46:47.480 and just take

00:46:48.280 them out.

00:46:49.480 And there

00:46:50.060 will be the

00:46:50.600 beginning.

00:46:52.480 Now here's

00:46:52.900 the other thing

00:46:53.360 that's really

00:46:53.820 pissing me

00:46:54.540 off.

00:46:56.320 How many

00:46:57.060 right wing

00:46:58.320 militias are

00:47:00.900 there?

00:47:03.440 You can

00:47:04.140 stop worrying

00:47:04.840 about your

00:47:05.340 right wing

00:47:05.820 militias.

00:47:07.340 Like if you're

00:47:07.920 on the left

00:47:08.420 and you're

00:47:08.780 worried about

00:47:09.180 right wing

00:47:09.680 militias,

00:47:11.680 they're not

00:47:13.140 doing anything

00:47:13.640 about an

00:47:14.120 invasion.

00:47:15.720 There's an

00:47:16.380 actual invasion

00:47:17.300 of the country

00:47:18.040 right now

00:47:19.380 and there

00:47:20.360 isn't one

00:47:21.240 frickin' 0.93

00:47:22.540 militia

00:47:23.000 who has

00:47:23.900 organized to

00:47:24.680 stop it.

00:47:26.480 None.

00:47:28.200 And you're

00:47:28.580 worried about

00:47:29.060 them?

00:47:29.260 They could

00:47:31.460 not be

00:47:31.860 more

00:47:32.100 toothless.

00:47:33.740 Clearly

00:47:34.120 this is

00:47:34.680 LARPing

00:47:35.280 and some

00:47:36.440 kind of

00:47:36.740 lifestyle

00:47:37.220 preference.

00:47:38.340 Clearly

00:47:38.700 the militias

00:47:39.440 are not

00:47:40.000 here to

00:47:40.380 protect

00:47:40.760 anything.

00:47:41.980 If they

00:47:42.340 were here

00:47:42.640 to protect

00:47:43.180 anything,

00:47:44.140 they would

00:47:44.740 be organizing

00:47:45.340 against the

00:47:45.980 cartels.

00:47:46.960 They'd be

00:47:47.420 doing what

00:47:47.860 the government

00:47:48.400 is not

00:47:48.960 doing for

00:47:49.520 them,

00:47:49.860 which is

00:47:50.280 protecting

00:47:50.700 the country.

00:47:52.080 Again,

00:47:52.760 I don't

00:47:53.060 recommend

00:47:53.500 militias.

00:47:54.200 I don't

00:47:54.460 recommend

00:47:54.800 that they

00:47:55.200 act in

00:47:55.980 any way.

00:47:56.340 I'm just

00:47:57.140 saying that

00:47:58.640 the country

00:47:59.280 is now

00:47:59.940 ready for

00:48:01.020 direct

00:48:01.640 violence.

00:48:03.960 And I

00:48:04.560 don't care

00:48:04.980 if they're

00:48:05.300 in the

00:48:05.540 country or

00:48:06.000 not.

00:48:07.140 I'm not

00:48:07.560 recommending

00:48:08.020 it.

00:48:08.680 I'm saying

00:48:09.080 what I

00:48:09.400 care about.

00:48:11.000 So,

00:48:11.820 to be

00:48:12.540 perfectly

00:48:13.040 clear,

00:48:13.960 I would

00:48:14.440 love every

00:48:15.060 American

00:48:15.420 citizen to

00:48:16.160 say in

00:48:16.540 public that

00:48:17.840 they would

00:48:18.220 not vote

00:48:19.460 to convict

00:48:20.220 if they

00:48:20.520 were on a

00:48:20.900 jury.

00:48:21.700 They would

00:48:22.180 never

00:48:22.440 convict an

00:48:23.140 American for

00:48:23.860 killing a

00:48:24.360 cartel

00:48:24.740 member in

00:48:25.360 the United

00:48:27.460 States or

00:48:28.220 even in

00:48:28.580 Mexico.

00:48:31.120 I'd like

00:48:31.820 to see if

00:48:33.420 we have

00:48:33.840 anybody in

00:48:34.520 Congress who

00:48:35.280 isn't useless,

00:48:37.600 I'd like to

00:48:38.180 see one of

00:48:38.680 them propose

00:48:39.580 a law,

00:48:40.440 a federal

00:48:40.840 law,

00:48:42.120 that says

00:48:42.740 that if

00:48:43.120 you kill a 0.76

00:48:43.620 cartel

00:48:44.020 member on

00:48:45.060 American soil,

00:48:45.920 it's legal

00:48:46.380 under any

00:48:48.040 condition.

00:48:49.440 You don't

00:48:49.980 have to be

00:48:50.380 directly

00:48:50.740 threatened.

00:48:52.680 Now,

00:48:53.100 such a

00:48:53.600 law could

00:48:54.040 never be

00:48:54.540 passed.

00:48:55.220 Would you

00:48:55.560 agree?

00:48:56.580 There's no

00:48:57.180 way Congress

00:48:57.780 would pass

00:48:58.360 a law like

00:48:58.820 that because

00:48:59.180 it would be

00:48:59.560 violence in

00:49:00.360 the streets.

00:49:01.440 But we

00:49:02.100 should have

00:49:02.440 the conversation.

00:49:04.520 We should

00:49:05.200 have the

00:49:05.640 conversation

00:49:06.240 about killing

00:49:07.820 cartel

00:49:08.640 members on

00:49:09.480 American soil,

00:49:10.820 citizens doing 0.94

00:49:11.940 it.

00:49:12.740 Because our

00:49:13.460 government has

00:49:14.120 abandoned us.

00:49:15.820 The government

00:49:16.760 has abandoned

00:49:17.760 you.

00:49:18.680 They are not

00:49:19.400 working to

00:49:19.960 protect you.

00:49:21.460 And if we

00:49:22.280 can't do that

00:49:22.940 ourselves,

00:49:23.500 we should

00:49:24.660 at least

00:49:24.960 ask why

00:49:25.440 not.

00:49:26.900 I'd like

00:49:27.760 to see

00:49:28.100 somebody do

00:49:29.380 a public

00:49:29.840 argument telling

00:49:31.480 us why we

00:49:32.220 can't do

00:49:32.760 that.

00:49:34.080 Now,

00:49:34.580 we can't do

00:49:35.040 it because

00:49:35.360 it's illegal,

00:49:36.000 and I

00:49:36.560 vigorously

00:49:37.440 recommend you

00:49:38.720 don't do

00:49:39.080 anything like

00:49:39.760 that.

00:49:40.440 But we

00:49:41.100 should have

00:49:41.440 a conversation

00:49:42.080 about making

00:49:42.640 it legal.

00:49:44.460 Because if

00:49:45.240 the government

00:49:45.680 is abandoning

00:49:46.380 you, you

00:49:47.680 have the

00:49:48.200 absolute

00:49:48.840 right of

00:49:49.440 self-defense.

00:49:51.260 There is

00:49:52.020 no wiggle

00:49:54.100 room.

00:49:55.240 And right

00:49:55.500 now, the

00:49:55.860 government's

00:49:56.480 laws are

00:49:57.840 denying you

00:49:58.720 your natural

00:49:59.520 right of

00:50:00.480 self-defense.

00:50:02.000 You have a

00:50:02.460 natural right

00:50:03.040 to self-defense.

00:50:04.200 That's the

00:50:04.600 only natural

00:50:05.180 right I think

00:50:05.720 I believe

00:50:06.260 in.

00:50:07.940 I'm not a

00:50:08.760 big fan of

00:50:09.360 a thing called

00:50:10.000 natural rights,

00:50:10.820 but the

00:50:11.840 one that's

00:50:13.000 unambiguous

00:50:13.720 is self-defense.

00:50:17.600 Like, you

00:50:18.180 don't even

00:50:18.460 have to call

00:50:19.020 it a right

00:50:19.580 to say that

00:50:20.960 you agree

00:50:21.400 with it.

00:50:21.780 It just

00:50:22.080 is.

00:50:22.920 Like, that's

00:50:23.380 not something

00:50:23.760 you debate.

00:50:25.020 Self-defense

00:50:25.760 is not

00:50:27.080 a debate.

00:50:30.500 But I'd

00:50:31.140 like to see

00:50:31.560 the people

00:50:32.300 who are

00:50:32.520 against it

00:50:33.080 try.

00:50:34.120 I'd like to

00:50:34.780 see what

00:50:35.020 that looks

00:50:35.340 like.

00:50:37.040 All right,

00:50:37.660 so my main

00:50:38.220 point on this

00:50:38.920 is that the

00:50:39.520 American attitude

00:50:40.520 is changing

00:50:41.360 and it's

00:50:42.560 going to

00:50:43.140 lead to

00:50:43.660 something.

00:50:45.300 And my

00:50:46.260 prediction is

00:50:47.080 it's going

00:50:48.560 to be

00:50:48.720 violent.

00:50:50.060 It has to

00:50:50.880 be.

00:50:53.600 All right,

00:50:54.760 what else

00:50:55.800 is happening?

00:50:56.720 I think

00:50:57.120 that's about

00:50:57.600 it.

00:50:59.780 Probably

00:51:00.260 the best

00:51:01.040 live stream

00:51:01.580 you'll ever

00:51:01.960 see in your

00:51:02.400 life.

00:51:03.840 Now,

00:51:04.360 remember I

00:51:04.800 told you,

00:51:05.300 and I'll

00:51:05.580 tell you

00:51:05.960 again,

00:51:06.740 that AI

00:51:07.540 is going

00:51:10.020 to change

00:51:10.400 everything

00:51:10.840 in a way

00:51:13.180 we cannot

00:51:13.960 predict,

00:51:15.080 cannot

00:51:15.440 predict.

00:51:19.320 But this

00:51:20.220 UFO thing

00:51:20.960 is interesting

00:51:21.540 in its

00:51:22.240 timing,

00:51:22.780 isn't it?

00:51:24.360 If you

00:51:25.180 were another

00:51:27.000 civilization,

00:51:28.240 let's say

00:51:28.540 an advanced

00:51:29.060 civilization,

00:51:30.280 and you

00:51:30.600 had been

00:51:30.900 watching Earth

00:51:31.680 for hundreds

00:51:33.140 of years

00:51:33.640 or whatever,

00:51:35.240 would you

00:51:36.020 contact the

00:51:37.100 citizens

00:51:37.560 before they

00:51:39.160 had AI

00:51:39.840 or is

00:51:41.540 the

00:51:41.740 introduction

00:51:42.200 of AI,

00:51:43.000 which let's

00:51:43.660 speculate they

00:51:45.020 know is

00:51:45.440 happening,

00:51:46.280 would that

00:51:46.880 be the

00:51:47.240 time you

00:51:47.720 made

00:51:47.920 contact?

00:51:49.620 Because that's

00:51:50.260 a weird

00:51:50.540 coincidence,

00:51:51.000 isn't it?

00:51:51.880 That our

00:51:52.500 UFO hysteria

00:51:53.640 is at a

00:51:55.480 peak at

00:51:56.080 exactly the

00:51:56.780 same time

00:51:57.420 the AI is

00:51:58.560 becoming

00:51:58.860 conscious.

00:52:00.400 I don't

00:52:01.000 know.

00:52:01.320 That would

00:52:01.560 be sort

00:52:02.060 of a big

00:52:02.420 coincidence if

00:52:03.360 those two

00:52:03.840 things were

00:52:04.360 happening.

00:52:04.700 Now, I'm

00:52:05.640 still going

00:52:06.000 to go

00:52:06.240 with the

00:52:06.700 UFOs

00:52:07.440 are all

00:52:07.700 fake.

00:52:09.380 So, in

00:52:10.380 case you

00:52:12.020 want to

00:52:12.400 know where

00:52:13.180 I stand,

00:52:13.640 I believe

00:52:14.040 all of the

00:52:14.720 UFOs are

00:52:15.300 fake in

00:52:16.600 terms of

00:52:17.020 aliens.

00:52:17.520 I don't

00:52:17.800 believe

00:52:18.040 aliens are

00:52:18.580 on Earth.

00:52:20.080 But,

00:52:20.920 if there

00:52:22.900 are aliens,

00:52:26.220 the version

00:52:27.380 I prefer

00:52:28.140 is that

00:52:29.800 they've

00:52:30.060 always been

00:52:30.560 here,

00:52:32.100 always

00:52:32.460 meaning

00:52:33.160 since the

00:52:33.740 beginning of

00:52:34.160 people.

00:52:34.700 but they

00:52:35.340 had to

00:52:35.580 get here

00:52:35.840 somewhere.

00:52:36.820 Yeah.

00:52:37.220 My preference

00:52:38.580 is that

00:52:39.320 they've always

00:52:39.820 been here

00:52:40.240 on Earth

00:52:40.700 and that

00:52:42.080 they live

00:52:42.440 underwater.

00:52:46.320 That's all.

00:52:47.500 They just

00:52:47.880 live underwater.

00:52:50.120 And the

00:52:50.980 reason we

00:52:51.380 can't find

00:52:51.860 them is they

00:52:52.360 live in

00:52:52.720 deep water

00:52:53.300 and it's

00:52:54.420 just deeper

00:52:55.240 than we

00:52:55.620 can detect.

00:52:59.520 Yeah.

00:53:00.220 Now, I

00:53:00.720 would not

00:53:01.520 bet on

00:53:01.920 that.

00:53:02.860 Yeah.

00:53:03.040 Or maybe

00:53:03.480 they're like

00:53:04.400 Atlantis

00:53:05.620 or something

00:53:05.980 like that.

00:53:06.560 Now, I

00:53:06.920 wouldn't bet

00:53:07.260 on that.

00:53:08.160 I would put

00:53:08.820 zero dollars

00:53:09.640 to bet

00:53:10.020 that that's

00:53:10.460 true.

00:53:11.640 But, if

00:53:12.440 there are

00:53:12.900 aliens, it

00:53:14.180 seems more

00:53:14.700 likely that

00:53:15.500 their travel

00:53:16.120 time is

00:53:18.260 limited.

00:53:20.580 It feels

00:53:21.400 like to

00:53:22.500 have a lot

00:53:23.060 of activity

00:53:23.720 would sort

00:53:25.600 of indicate

00:53:26.160 they're here.

00:53:26.740 if we

00:53:28.200 saw one

00:53:28.760 thing once

00:53:29.580 that would

00:53:30.820 suggest it

00:53:31.900 was one

00:53:32.520 ship from

00:53:33.160 a distant

00:53:33.920 planet.

00:53:35.420 But if

00:53:35.780 there's

00:53:36.100 stuff swirling

00:53:37.460 around and

00:53:38.040 has been for

00:53:38.620 years, just

00:53:40.000 aliens all 0.95

00:53:40.640 over the

00:53:40.960 place, well,

00:53:42.340 then I'd

00:53:42.720 suggest maybe

00:53:43.360 they're already

00:53:43.800 here just

00:53:44.740 because of

00:53:45.140 the commute

00:53:45.720 time.

00:53:49.540 Some are

00:53:50.340 interdimensional.

00:53:51.960 Maybe so.

00:53:52.760 Maybe so.

00:53:55.820 Maybe they're

00:53:57.600 just different

00:53:58.080 game players.

00:53:59.780 Maybe this

00:54:00.500 simulation exists

00:54:01.620 but people are

00:54:02.500 playing different

00:54:03.120 games on the

00:54:03.780 same field.

00:54:05.140 Because it's

00:54:05.580 expensive,

00:54:06.440 relatively, to

00:54:07.800 create an

00:54:08.320 entire environment.

00:54:10.020 But once you've

00:54:10.560 created it, maybe

00:54:11.900 the people who

00:54:13.300 created it said,

00:54:13.880 oh, let's

00:54:14.180 introduce some

00:54:14.740 aliens and

00:54:15.560 we'll put some

00:54:16.760 animals and

00:54:17.700 some people.

00:54:18.760 And you could

00:54:19.280 inhabit any of

00:54:20.160 them.

00:54:21.440 So as a

00:54:22.000 game player, you

00:54:22.700 could be a

00:54:23.980 human character

00:54:24.720 or an alien

00:54:25.820 character who

00:54:26.520 is visiting.

00:54:29.820 Now, how

00:54:30.520 many of you

00:54:30.940 think the

00:54:31.340 alien stuff is

00:54:32.280 an intentional

00:54:33.660 distraction?

00:54:34.580 It's an obvious

00:54:35.140 distraction.

00:54:36.240 But do you

00:54:36.780 think it's a

00:54:37.560 government-intended

00:54:39.140 distraction?

00:54:42.160 I don't see

00:54:43.220 any evidence

00:54:44.360 of that.

00:54:46.380 What I see

00:54:47.280 is a government

00:54:48.020 that doesn't

00:54:48.580 know how to

00:54:49.040 deal with

00:54:49.440 whatever the

00:54:49.880 hell is

00:54:50.120 happening.

00:54:51.120 All I see

00:54:51.920 is incompetence.

00:54:52.700 and uncertainty.

00:54:55.860 That's all

00:54:56.660 I see.

00:54:58.220 If you think

00:54:59.160 that the

00:54:59.860 collection of

00:55:00.980 uncertainty and

00:55:01.880 stupidity

00:55:02.500 indicates a

00:55:04.200 ultra-capable

00:55:05.260 government that

00:55:06.600 has secrets,

00:55:08.320 maybe.

00:55:11.940 Maybe they're

00:55:12.920 ultra-capable

00:55:13.860 and ultra-capable

00:55:15.320 of keeping

00:55:15.820 secrets.

00:55:17.340 Maybe.

00:55:17.940 But what is

00:55:19.940 more likely?

00:55:21.360 It's more

00:55:22.060 likely that you're

00:55:22.960 just seeing a

00:55:23.420 bunch of

00:55:23.760 uncertainty and

00:55:24.700 incompetence and

00:55:25.580 space garbage.

00:55:27.380 It's probably

00:55:27.800 just space

00:55:28.260 garbage.

00:55:29.340 It's probably

00:55:29.720 just weather

00:55:31.280 balloons that

00:55:32.240 are deactivated

00:55:34.540 that just never

00:55:35.160 came down.

00:55:36.780 Don't you think?

00:55:37.720 Plastic bags,

00:55:38.740 weather balloons.

00:55:40.020 I think we're just

00:55:40.960 going to find out

00:55:41.540 that there's some

00:55:42.040 kind of debris

00:55:42.700 in space.

00:55:43.980 It always has

00:55:44.620 been.

00:55:47.080 Always in

00:55:48.240 modern times,

00:55:48.920 anyway.

00:55:53.220 We were

00:55:53.940 capable enough

00:55:54.780 to blow up

00:55:55.280 the Nord Stream.

00:55:56.380 Well, I do

00:55:57.460 believe that

00:55:58.020 Americans are

00:55:58.800 capable of

00:55:59.700 blowing shit

00:56:00.420 up.

00:56:02.460 Yeah.

00:56:03.340 If you gave

00:56:04.540 us one task,

00:56:05.560 say, all right,

00:56:06.480 here are a

00:56:07.020 hundred tasks.

00:56:08.980 Number one

00:56:09.720 task, I'd like

00:56:10.980 you to work

00:56:11.440 out this

00:56:11.820 reparations thing

00:56:12.880 so all the

00:56:13.460 public is happy.

00:56:15.100 Probably not

00:56:16.480 so good at

00:56:17.120 that.

00:56:17.840 Number two,

00:56:18.660 we'd like you

00:56:19.240 to change your

00:56:20.300 spending habits

00:56:21.080 to bring down

00:56:22.500 the inflation

00:56:23.380 and national

00:56:24.000 debt.

00:56:25.520 Probably not

00:56:27.060 so good at

00:56:27.620 that.

00:56:28.640 We'd like you

00:56:29.260 to change

00:56:30.880 the racial

00:56:32.240 animosity in

00:56:33.680 this country

00:56:34.120 and bring down

00:56:34.700 the temperature.

00:56:36.780 Not so good.

00:56:38.820 Now, let's

00:56:39.380 say we give

00:56:40.080 them the

00:56:40.420 tenth task,

00:56:41.300 which is,

00:56:42.600 we'd like you

00:56:43.120 to blow up

00:56:43.720 some shit.

00:56:45.640 Do you want

00:56:46.300 it to blow

00:56:46.800 up in a

00:56:47.220 certain way?

00:56:48.600 No, no,

00:56:49.700 just blow the 0.51

00:56:51.040 shit out of

00:56:51.540 it.

00:56:52.640 Do you think

00:56:53.160 America can do

00:56:54.140 that?

00:56:55.720 Yes, we can.

00:56:57.140 Yes, we can.

00:56:58.340 We can blow up

00:56:59.380 something no matter

00:57:00.220 where it is.

00:57:01.500 We can find

00:57:02.360 shit in space

00:57:03.180 and blow it up. 0.90

00:57:04.400 We can find

00:57:05.060 things you didn't

00:57:05.660 even know existed

00:57:06.440 and we'll blow

00:57:07.140 that up too.

00:57:08.280 There isn't

00:57:08.800 anything we can't

00:57:09.560 blow up. 0.92

00:57:10.020 You got a

00:57:10.960 bridge, we'll

00:57:11.640 take it out.

00:57:12.540 You got a

00:57:13.080 jet, we'll

00:57:13.800 blow it up. 0.56

00:57:14.880 You got a

00:57:15.500 building, we'll

00:57:16.160 take it, we'll

00:57:16.900 take it, we'll

00:57:17.380 blow it up. 0.56

00:57:18.420 Yeah, blowing

00:57:19.580 stuff up is

00:57:20.560 what we can

00:57:20.980 do.

00:57:24.480 High altitude,

00:57:25.820 Pentagon

00:57:26.420 testing mass

00:57:27.500 surveillance balloons

00:57:28.460 across the U.S.

00:57:32.040 So this is

00:57:32.780 from 2019.

00:57:34.440 The Pentagon

00:57:34.960 was testing

00:57:35.940 mass

00:57:36.760 surveillance

00:57:38.060 balloons across

00:57:38.900 the U.S.

00:57:41.540 Now this

00:57:42.380 article was

00:57:43.040 in The Guardian

00:57:43.600 so who

00:57:44.500 knows how

00:57:44.940 reliable it

00:57:45.620 is.

00:57:46.440 But that

00:57:49.180 would fit

00:57:49.880 my hypothesis.

00:57:52.340 My hypothesis

00:57:53.120 is that there's

00:57:54.000 just tons of

00:57:54.620 shit floating

00:57:55.140 around up

00:57:55.620 there.

00:57:56.460 Some of it

00:57:57.100 is just

00:57:57.780 garbage, some

00:57:58.500 of it we

00:57:59.060 know about.

00:58:00.300 But probably

00:58:01.080 we have to

00:58:01.620 shoot down

00:58:02.100 our own

00:58:02.680 surveillance

00:58:03.600 balloons just

00:58:05.100 to show that

00:58:05.620 we're not

00:58:05.960 weak.

00:58:06.240 I feel

00:58:08.640 like Canada

00:58:09.200 was like,

00:58:09.940 hey, hey,

00:58:10.860 can you

00:58:11.200 shoot down

00:58:11.540 one of our

00:58:12.080 balloons?

00:58:13.700 Because we

00:58:14.340 don't want to

00:58:15.280 look weak.

00:58:16.700 We want to

00:58:17.400 look feminine.

00:58:18.520 So we're

00:58:19.120 going to ask

00:58:19.400 the big strong

00:58:20.000 United States

00:58:20.580 to shoot it

00:58:21.060 down for us.

00:58:22.720 Thanks, guys.

00:58:25.440 All right.

00:58:28.920 Careful.

00:58:29.680 Scott is an

00:58:30.280 FBI informant.

00:58:31.400 You're being

00:58:31.880 warned in the

00:58:32.560 comments.

00:58:32.920 that's totally

00:58:35.000 likely.

00:58:37.080 All right.

00:58:40.700 That might be

00:58:41.840 totally what's

00:58:42.400 happening.

00:58:42.940 Yeah, I'm not

00:58:43.440 joking.

00:58:44.460 When I say

00:58:45.280 that we may

00:58:45.920 have intentionally

00:58:46.780 shot down one

00:58:47.820 of our own

00:58:48.500 assets to make

00:58:50.120 it look like

00:58:50.800 Biden is

00:58:51.520 decisive and

00:58:52.540 our military

00:58:53.800 is capable,

00:58:54.820 that's a real

00:58:55.860 thing.

00:58:57.040 I would say

00:58:57.860 that's at

00:58:58.240 least 40%

00:59:01.240 likely.

00:59:02.920 maybe not

00:59:04.840 the most

00:59:05.320 likely thing,

00:59:06.240 but it's at

00:59:06.640 least 40%

00:59:07.500 likely we

00:59:08.220 knew we

00:59:08.580 were shooting

00:59:08.960 down our

00:59:09.380 own asset

00:59:09.920 just to

00:59:11.760 look tough.

00:59:12.980 If we were

00:59:14.000 unmanned,

00:59:14.720 it would be

00:59:15.060 a pretty

00:59:15.420 inexpensive way

00:59:16.380 to boost

00:59:17.660 your military

00:59:18.460 preparedness

00:59:19.720 illusion.

00:59:22.780 All right.

00:59:25.500 YouTube,

00:59:26.180 I think we're

00:59:26.660 done here.

00:59:27.680 I'm going to

00:59:28.020 go talk

00:59:28.780 privately to

00:59:29.500 the local

00:59:30.720 subscribers.

00:59:32.920 But on

00:59:34.920 YouTube,

00:59:35.480 you can do

00:59:35.900 me a favor

00:59:36.380 and hit

00:59:37.620 the subscribe

00:59:38.360 button.

00:59:39.900 Turns out

00:59:40.400 that that's

00:59:40.780 useful,

00:59:41.420 so hit that

00:59:41.840 subscribe button

00:59:42.600 if you like.

00:59:44.400 And I'll see

00:59:47.140 you tomorrow

00:59:47.520 on YouTube,

00:59:48.540 and we'll talk

00:59:49.180 to the local

00:59:50.000 people for a

00:59:50.660 bit.

00:59:51.220 Bye for now.

00:59:52.460 Best live

00:59:52.980 stream you've

00:59:53.460 ever seen.

00:59:53.880 because of

00:59:55.420 this

00:59:55.760 time

00:59:56.760 I'm out.

00:59:56.940 And I'll see you

00:59:57.600 wo cone up

00:59:58.480 And that's

00:59:59.300 whatever

00:59:59.880 is going to be

01:00:01.880 going to happen.

01:00:03.860 I'm going to

01:00:04.540 wait for you

01:00:05.160 to go

01:00:07.160 and let's

01:00:07.900 say

01:00:08.000 and

01:00:08.720 go

01:00:09.360 out.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - February 12, 2023

Episode 2017 Scott Adams： UFO News, Baby Jesus Born？ Chicken Hoaxes, Walls Not Closing In

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript