Real Coffee with Scott Adams - February 12, 2023


Episode 2017 Scott Adams： UFO News, Baby Jesus Born？ Chicken Hoaxes, Walls Not Closing In


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour

Words per Minute

138.12115

Word Count

8,309

Sentence Count

704

Misogynist Sentences

8

Hate Speech Sentences

29


Summary

A female gibbon in a Japanese zoo has given birth after being in isolation for two years, and it s a girl. Could this mean Baby Jesus has come back from beyond the shadow of the earth? Or is it just another case of immaculate conception?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Coffee with Scott Adams, which is the highlight of
00:00:07.900 civilization. And today we've got some of the most interesting stories of all time.
00:00:16.100 None of them are true, but I think you're used to that. So if you'd like to get ready
00:00:21.600 for the fake news of the century, the fake news palosa. Is that something? Fake news
00:00:29.680 palosa. It's the cornucopia of fake news, and it's all here today. And if you'd like to enjoy it
00:00:36.680 to its maximum potential, all you need is a cupper mug or a glass of tanker, chalice, or
00:00:41.960 stein, a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:00:48.980 I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dope mean hit of the day, the thing
00:00:54.560 that makes everything better. And today, today only, a little hint of oxytocin. Just a little
00:01:01.640 bit, see if you can detect it. Ah, yeah, I got it. There's one note of oxytocin in there
00:01:11.600 today. But the dopamine is sublime, as usual. Well, I don't know if you caught it, but the
00:01:19.800 biggest story of the day is that a Japanese zoo reports that they have a female gibbon
00:01:28.560 that has given birth despite living in isolation for two years. So there were no boy gibbons anywhere
00:01:37.600 to be seen for two years. And yet, the female gibbon is pregnant. Now, this could mean one
00:01:47.520 of two things. Number one, it's a good thing I'm not an employee of that zoo. Can we all
00:01:55.220 agree it's a good thing I'm not an employee of the zoo that had the gibbon that had the
00:02:00.100 baby without any boy of gibbons? Because I'm the kind of asshole who would be mercilessly
00:02:08.220 mocking the zookeeper. So, got that female gibbon in there. She's looking kind of hot. They
00:02:16.600 tell me that no male gibbons have been in there for two years. Two years. Seems there's only
00:02:22.800 one person who has the key. Bob. Bob, you're the only person who's been in that gibbon
00:02:29.220 habitat. And I'm just saying maybe you and the gibbon got a little busy. Now, okay, you
00:02:40.260 know that didn't happen. But you know if I worked there, I would be mercilessly mocking
00:02:46.100 Bob for having access to the gibbon. Can we agree on that? It's a good thing I don't work
00:02:53.200 there. Okay, let's agree on that. The second thing is, I think we're missing the significance
00:02:59.200 because I only know one case in history in which a primate had an immaculate conception.
00:03:08.940 So, there's at least a possibility that baby Jesus has returned, but maybe was being a little
00:03:20.500 bit more modest than the last time. Now, you don't think of Jesus as like a bragger, right?
00:03:26.720 Am I right? Jesus was not like, oh, look at my Rolex. And Jesus could have had a Rolex. He
00:03:34.520 had powers. But no, Jesus is humble. If there's anything we know, Jesus is not a show-off. And
00:03:42.060 I think it would be just like him to come back as a baby gibbon. Because that would put everything
00:03:48.340 in perspective. You'd be like, oh, we're humans. We're so special. Then Jesus would come back
00:03:53.720 and say, oh, I'm not so special. I'm a gibbon. And I'm Jesus. You're like, not even that.
00:04:03.420 So, I think it would be a good lesson for humankind. Now, just so you know, a gibbon is not a monkey.
00:04:11.840 So, some of you are tempted to say, oh, it's monkey Jesus. That's, first of all, that would be
00:04:17.300 disrespectful. Second of all, it would be technically incorrect. It is a gibbon. And a gibbon, I looked
00:04:23.120 it up. They're not one of the great apes. Not a great ape. Again, totally consistent with Jesus's
00:04:30.560 personality. Jesus isn't going to come back as like a great ape. That would be not very modest, would it?
00:04:37.820 Oh, I'm the great ape. Look at me. I came back as a great ape. No, that would be so, so not in keeping
00:04:46.900 with the whole vibe. Instead, there's at least a possibility that he chose what's called the lesser
00:04:53.520 apes. The gibbons are small compared to the great apes. So, they're called the lesser apes. I think
00:05:01.460 that's perfect. I feel like that's right on brand. It's like, not too showy, but still making a point.
00:05:11.620 It makes a point without being too showy. So, I think at the exact time that the space aliens are
00:05:18.140 attacking Earth, baby gibbon Jesus may have come back. We don't know this. This is not confirmed.
00:05:24.160 But possibly, possibly, and would be, we're hoping, we're hoping baby gibbon Jesus is on our side.
00:05:34.880 Because if baby gibbon Jesus is on the alien invader side, it's going to be harder than we thought.
00:05:42.620 And Joe Biden will tell you, you're going to need more than your AR-15 for that.
00:05:47.900 You're going to need more than your AR-15 for that.
00:05:50.240 Let's talk about chickens not laying eggs. Have any of you heard that chickens stop laying eggs
00:06:01.780 because there's something in their feed that makes them non-egg layers? Well, I would ask you
00:06:12.380 to Google chickens not laying eggs and then the word debunked. Because it looks like chickens are
00:06:24.780 laying eggs. But there are always some times when some individual groups of chickens will not be
00:06:31.040 laying eggs. And individual farms could have, you know, a variety of problems that are unique to the
00:06:39.460 farm. So it's not that unusual if one farm has chickens that are not laying eggs.
00:06:45.860 It would be very unusual if they were all not laying eggs. But apparently that's not the point.
00:06:52.020 Apparently that's not happening.
00:06:53.680 So don't worry about your chicken eggs. Price is high, but there are plenty of them.
00:07:00.140 Wall Street Journal reports that the government started getting smart.
00:07:03.280 I know. You're not going to believe this story. This will be wild. You did not see this coming.
00:07:12.780 This is out of left field, people. It could be, again, related to Baby Gibbon Jesus or possibly
00:07:19.820 the alien invasion. Because this is not normal behavior. All right? Listen to this. The government
00:07:25.860 did this. Our actual government, the U.S. government. Wall Street Journal reports that the Biden
00:07:32.560 administration has started approving state requests to use Medicaid to pay for groceries
00:07:38.300 and nutritional counseling. It turns out that our government has discovered, and I think
00:07:45.700 it's true, that what you eat is related to your health. Has anybody heard that before?
00:07:53.820 This is brand new information. What you eat and how much of it could have an impact on your
00:08:01.480 health. No, no, seriously. I'm not kidding. Stop it. Stop doubting me. It's true. It's a true
00:08:09.660 fact. And what's more amazing than that, if that were not amazing enough, the U.S. government
00:08:19.660 apparently is acting rationally. And, I don't know, preliminarily, it looks like it's in the
00:08:29.780 interest of the public. Like, I don't want to get ahead of myself, but it looks like they
00:08:36.560 did something smart that's good for us. I, okay, screw it. Yeah, I don't believe it either.
00:08:44.320 Yeah. They'll find some way to take it back. But, for a moment there, I felt this little
00:08:51.340 tinge of government competence. It was, like, thrilling. It, like, went through me like a,
00:08:57.560 like a chill. Well, goosebumps. Goosebumps. Just the thought that the government would make
00:09:03.100 a good decision. Wow. But, probably not. I'm sure they'll find some way to screw that up.
00:09:09.160 Here's an amazing thing that happened on CNN today. In an opinion piece by someone who's
00:09:17.480 not a normal CNN contributor. I'm not saying that the person is not normal. I'm saying not
00:09:24.620 routinely a contributor to CNN, which is important to the story. It's Jennifer Rogers, former federal
00:09:31.940 prosecutor, is arguing that the walls are not closing in on Trump. Did you ever think you
00:09:38.580 would see that? There's an opinion piece on CNN website whose only point, there's like
00:09:47.920 one point of view. It's not like two points of view showing both sides. There's one point
00:09:52.600 of view that says the walls are not closing in on Trump. And that some recent things with,
00:09:58.980 I guess, the old prosecutor for Manhattan, I guess they're the ones that are following up
00:10:05.640 on the Stormy Daniels payment, that BS story. Not BS in terms of it not being true, but BS in terms
00:10:14.300 of nobody cares. Nobody cares. There's not a single person in the whole world who cares if Trump did or
00:10:23.560 did not use campaign funds to pay off Stormy Daniels. Zero people care. But, apparently, the
00:10:31.460 prior prosecutor wrote a book. And in the book, he gives away a little bit more information than a
00:10:40.080 prosecutor ought to be giving away. So it makes it a little bit easier for the defense to know exactly
00:10:46.260 what the worst prosecutor was thinking in terms of what the case would look like, which is just a
00:10:51.680 present to the defense. But it also showed that they seem to be wildly interested in just getting
00:10:58.300 Trump, which is a real gift to the defense. So, I don't know. The big story here is not
00:11:07.660 Trump's legal dilemma, because I think that was always trivial. What's different is that CNN
00:11:13.720 is going out of their way to say that it's trivial, and that he's moving in the direction of less risk,
00:11:20.200 not more. I've never seen that before. Have you? Have you ever seen CNN write a story with no hedging?
00:11:26.520 There's no hedging to it whatsoever. It just says, it looks like things are going his way.
00:11:32.880 It's different, right? Yeah. And I like the fact that the public is being brutal on CNN,
00:11:39.480 because I believe CNN could be a valuable asset to the country. And I think they had been in the past.
00:11:48.240 You know, they certainly went useless at some point. But I'd love to see them rehabilitated.
00:11:54.000 I'd love to know that the news, you know, was real for a change. So, we'll see. How many of you
00:12:01.380 have forgotten the Durham investigation that was supposed to be the walls closing in on, I don't
00:12:07.980 know who, Democrats and the Department of Justice and the FBI and Hillary Clinton and everybody
00:12:12.900 associated with her? And then, basically, they got kind of nothing? Do you think that's because
00:12:20.640 there was nothing there and we all got excited and there was never anything there?
00:12:27.140 So, here's what I think. I think that the Durham investigation was looking for crime.
00:12:34.460 And if your conspiracy involved, just hypothetically, just hypothetically, if a conspiracy involved
00:12:40.800 people at the Department of Justice, the FBI, lawyers, and had Democrats who mostly are lawyers,
00:12:50.920 do you think they couldn't figure out a way to do a plot without breaking any laws?
00:12:56.240 I feel like that would be easy.
00:12:59.380 Just don't write anything down in an email that's clearly illegal.
00:13:02.840 And just have all your conversations privately.
00:13:07.780 And then, everybody does things which individually look like they could have been explained
00:13:11.880 by one individual doing something they thought was the right thing to do.
00:13:16.400 That's all it would take.
00:13:18.100 So, I'm not sure that the Durham investigation tells you anything
00:13:22.200 about what did or did not happen.
00:13:24.800 The only thing that it does tell you is it was not something overtly and easily identifiable
00:13:31.060 that was illegal.
00:13:34.860 So, yeah, and all those conversations with super sketchy text stuff, that's super sketchy,
00:13:42.060 but I think it falls short of being obviously criminal.
00:13:45.840 Meaning that if there's at least one other interpretation, that's all you need.
00:13:51.220 You only need one other interpretation of the facts and you're free.
00:13:55.740 That's the whole story.
00:13:56.860 So, when they say stuff like, you know, something is an insurance policy,
00:14:02.860 that could be an indication that that person had bias, which is not illegal, is it?
00:14:12.160 Is it illegal to be a human being with bias?
00:14:15.960 As long as what you're doing is your job, no, it's not illegal to have bias.
00:14:21.340 It's illegal to act in a biased manner, but it's not illegal to have bias.
00:14:27.380 So, they would have to find that they did something that was very non-standard
00:14:32.120 and bordered on illegal to have anything.
00:14:35.840 So, I don't know that Durham finding nothing means there's nothing there.
00:14:40.500 It might mean there was nothing illegal or nothing easily found that was illegal.
00:14:44.960 Well, let's talk about those UFOs.
00:14:47.480 The funniest meme I saw in the UFO hysteria is an alien talking to another one.
00:14:55.420 And one alien says, can we land yet?
00:14:57.920 And the other alien says, no, it's too early.
00:15:00.780 At the moment, they're trying to change the weather by eating bugs.
00:15:07.380 We are kind of doing that, aren't we?
00:15:10.500 Isn't that sort of exactly what we're doing?
00:15:16.580 I believe that's actually the literal idea on the table.
00:15:21.480 To eat bugs to change the weather.
00:15:25.880 What's funny about it is that it's technically true.
00:15:29.060 It's technically true.
00:15:30.360 We're trying to eat bugs to change the weather.
00:15:32.800 That's a funny meme.
00:15:34.720 All right.
00:15:35.680 What else about this hysteria?
00:15:37.840 Yeah.
00:15:40.500 The thing I'm waiting for is when the alien leader asked to meet our leader.
00:15:47.380 And the only thing we can hope is that the advanced intelligence of this alien civilization,
00:15:53.640 I hope they have a sense of humor.
00:15:57.080 Because when we show them Biden, they're going to talk to him for five minutes,
00:16:01.460 and then they're going to turn to us and say, okay, you're joking, right?
00:16:06.620 No, seriously.
00:16:07.560 That was a pretty good one.
00:16:08.800 You got us.
00:16:09.600 We traveled from Alpha Centauri, and that was one of the best pranks we've seen.
00:16:15.840 We almost believe that was your leader.
00:16:18.960 No, seriously.
00:16:20.440 Seriously.
00:16:21.000 Show us the real one.
00:16:23.080 You know, honestly, our universal translator isn't even working on this guy.
00:16:28.040 I mean, I'm looking at the universal translator.
00:16:29.820 He talked, and I think he said, we're going to focus on the...
00:16:35.480 We don't even know what that means.
00:16:39.380 This is a universal translator.
00:16:42.300 Universal.
00:16:43.620 It doesn't work on this guy that you're pretending is your leader.
00:16:46.880 We don't know.
00:16:47.520 What are you saying?
00:16:48.320 It seems like some kind of mumble talk.
00:16:49.940 We don't know.
00:16:51.920 So that could not go well, perhaps.
00:16:56.600 Anyway, so we got an unidentified object shot down over Canada.
00:17:02.520 One shot down over Alaska.
00:17:04.600 Another one shot down over our warmer waters in the southeast.
00:17:10.140 So now we've got three objects, one definitely a Chinese spy balloon, or not, who knows.
00:17:20.240 And then two things that are mysterious.
00:17:22.680 One of them might have been a giant tube with no people and no guidance system.
00:17:29.560 How do you know there are no people in it?
00:17:31.080 If you saw a giant metallic tube flying at 40,000 feet with no windows, there's no windows,
00:17:43.620 how would you know there were no people in it?
00:17:48.900 Or aliens?
00:17:50.300 How would you know there's no aliens in there?
00:17:53.000 What mechanism do we have to know what's inside the big tube?
00:17:57.400 Or gibbons?
00:17:58.560 Or gibbons?
00:18:00.140 Yeah.
00:18:00.280 I don't know.
00:18:01.460 I feel like when they say it's unmanned, they either know it's a balloon,
00:18:07.460 because if they know it's a balloon, then they could reasonably intuit there's nothing inside it.
00:18:13.600 Right?
00:18:14.080 Depending on the size of the balloon and where it is and everything.
00:18:17.540 There's no exhaust.
00:18:19.760 So if I were to build an interplanetary wormhole traveling spaceship,
00:18:29.620 would it have windows?
00:18:32.240 And would aliens necessarily need to look at things?
00:18:35.520 Maybe aliens have a different type of way of sensing their environment.
00:18:39.900 Maybe they don't need to look at stuff with eyeballs, so they wouldn't need any windows.
00:18:45.760 Nor would they need any external propulsion signs, like smoke coming out of the engine or anything like that.
00:18:53.460 Because, my God, they just traveled interplanetary through a wormhole.
00:18:57.360 You don't need a gas engine for that, or even nuclear.
00:19:00.880 So, I don't believe that any aliens have visited us.
00:19:07.540 But I have questions.
00:19:09.880 Number one, why did the U.S. shoot down an object over Canadian airspace?
00:19:16.320 Now, it's reported that we were coordinating with the Canadian government.
00:19:22.100 But, why do we shoot things down over Canada?
00:19:27.360 Even with permission?
00:19:29.720 Is that because Canada doesn't have any air force that can shoot down a balloon?
00:19:36.200 Now, I get that NORAD is up there, and they saw it, and blah, blah, blah, blah.
00:19:43.260 And I get that we have better military assets, perhaps.
00:19:49.480 Maybe.
00:19:51.900 NORAD is joint U.S.-Canada.
00:19:54.800 It is?
00:19:56.120 NORAD is joint U.S.-Canada?
00:19:58.180 Well, NORAD is just the monitoring, right?
00:20:00.740 But when you put the actual jet up, I'm just wondering, why would Trudeau allow an American pilot to save Canada if Canada has pilots and missiles?
00:20:16.320 What's behind that?
00:20:18.440 He requested it.
00:20:20.400 Here's my theory.
00:20:23.520 As you know, Trudeau only looks for opportunities where he can look weak.
00:20:31.500 Am I right?
00:20:34.000 The Trudeau is always looking for a way to look weak and feminine.
00:20:38.660 The best way that Canada could look weak and feminine is to say, oh, could you help us with this UFO?
00:20:49.220 We don't think we can handle it with her.
00:20:52.100 Oh, we have jets.
00:20:53.000 Yeah, we have jets.
00:20:53.980 But could you handle this?
00:20:55.800 Maybe you could do this one.
00:20:57.920 How about you do this one?
00:20:59.580 Oh, you do this one.
00:21:01.400 We'll do the next one.
00:21:02.620 You do this one.
00:21:04.440 I feel like it was the most feminine thing Canada could do, to ask for help from the big, strong neighbor.
00:21:12.220 Oh, could you lift this?
00:21:14.080 Oh, we could do it.
00:21:15.040 Oh, yeah, we could do it ourselves.
00:21:16.100 But we'd have to stand on a chair.
00:21:18.520 Could you do it?
00:21:19.320 You look so big and strong.
00:21:20.480 How would you like to be a Canadian today?
00:21:26.040 How would you like to be male and Canadian today?
00:21:28.880 And not feeling so strong today, are you?
00:21:35.340 I'm sorry, Canada.
00:21:36.920 We love Canada.
00:21:38.940 But your leader, he's fun to mock.
00:21:43.860 All right.
00:21:46.420 What else is going on?
00:21:49.740 You may have done what I did, which is click on the UFO links on Twitter today.
00:21:56.000 Did you see how many UFO sightings there are, according to Twitter?
00:21:59.220 Now, I recognize some of them as being, you know, old ones, and they look like hoaxes and stuff.
00:22:06.540 So here's the thing I can guarantee you.
00:22:09.660 95% of everything you see on these UFO stories is just made up.
00:22:15.240 Would you agree?
00:22:17.400 Whatever is true, I don't know.
00:22:19.940 But at a minimum, at a minimum, 95% of everything you see is just made up.
00:22:24.720 So if you see a picture of a UFO, if you see a video, and even if it looks like it was taken from the space shuttle,
00:22:33.220 and even if it looks like there's a ship landing on the moon, which we saw this morning,
00:22:39.120 no matter what you see, there's a 95% chance it's not true, no matter the source.
00:22:46.280 No matter the source.
00:22:47.400 Now, I'm allowing 5%, which is pretty big, if you're talking about, you know, aliens visiting the Earth.
00:22:55.980 5% is really big.
00:22:57.780 I'm just allowing that, you know, anything's possible.
00:23:02.200 Anything is possible.
00:23:03.700 So I'm not going to rule it out, but I wouldn't believe any of the pictures.
00:23:08.500 So don't believe any videos or any pictures.
00:23:12.040 That would be my advice.
00:23:13.060 All right.
00:23:17.860 So now there are pictures of cylinders flying everywhere.
00:23:23.400 Now, unfortunately, a cylindrical tube is the easiest thing to fake if you're going to do, like, Photoshop or a fake video.
00:23:35.400 Yeah, I'm trusting the experts again.
00:23:38.080 Exactly.
00:23:38.560 So anyway, let me ask the audience.
00:23:47.380 How many of you believe, literally, that space aliens are here?
00:23:53.160 Go.
00:23:53.960 How many of you believe it?
00:23:55.520 Like, just say yes, I believe that these are actual space aliens.
00:24:00.960 Oh, it's all no's.
00:24:02.500 I saw one yes.
00:24:06.020 They're on the way?
00:24:06.920 All right, a few yeses, but mostly no's.
00:24:09.760 All right, that's good.
00:24:10.880 That's good.
00:24:13.660 You know what?
00:24:15.220 Imagine if we had not experienced five straight years of nothing but fake news.
00:24:21.080 If you had not been trained and primed by fake news of every type,
00:24:27.180 would you be more likely to think there was an alien invasion?
00:24:29.940 I feel like we were protected by fake news.
00:24:37.100 The fake news acted as a...
00:24:39.780 What's the word I'm going to use?
00:24:41.720 Fill in my word.
00:24:43.440 Because we had so much fake news, we were primed and, let's say, protected from, let's say,
00:24:49.320 thoughts of a mass hysteria of UFOs invading.
00:24:53.580 A vaccine.
00:24:54.760 That's right.
00:24:55.460 Fake news acted as a vaccine so that almost all of you don't believe there's an alien invasion.
00:25:03.120 That's a real thing.
00:25:05.280 Just think about that for a moment.
00:25:07.300 If you had not been primed by five years of fake news, just obviously fake news,
00:25:12.340 you might have actually believed this was an alien invasion.
00:25:17.180 But now you're all so battle-worn and experienced that you know just because it's in the news
00:25:25.460 and just because you saw a video and just because you saw a picture
00:25:29.700 and just because you saw credible people talking to you on TV, that doesn't mean anything.
00:25:36.120 In 2023, what is the news value of a credible person telling you something happened that you can't verify?
00:25:45.940 Zero.
00:25:47.540 Zero.
00:25:49.340 Zero.
00:25:50.720 It doesn't matter how credible they are because everybody's lying on TV.
00:25:55.500 Every side, every issue, everybody's lying on TV.
00:25:57.940 So, it's kind of good that I think the public is treating the UFO stories and the balloon stories,
00:26:08.220 I think we're treating it as pure entertainment, which is exactly how we should treat it.
00:26:14.580 Am I right?
00:26:16.660 When I look at the UFO stuff, I don't see it as news per se.
00:26:20.620 I see it as just entertainment.
00:26:22.880 I don't think it has any impact on anything.
00:26:25.640 I think that probably there have always been balloon-like things floating around up there,
00:26:31.400 and countries are now just shooting them down to look tough.
00:26:34.920 Or in the case of Canada, they're asking their big manly neighbor to shoot it down
00:26:39.940 so that they can remain feminine.
00:26:42.960 And by the way, that is what's happening in Canada.
00:26:45.540 Am I right?
00:26:47.400 Mexico is becoming more male.
00:26:50.640 Canada is becoming more female in attitude, not gender.
00:26:54.240 And the United States is in the middle, and we're being, like, rocked by both of those things.
00:27:00.420 It's true.
00:27:03.040 Mexico's your dad.
00:27:05.020 Canada's your mom.
00:27:06.980 And America is trying to figure it out.
00:27:10.260 Like the two or three confused children of those two parents.
00:27:14.820 That's what it feels like.
00:27:15.900 All right, so don't believe anything on aliens.
00:27:20.120 Do you believe that there's a, I don't know, another country threat?
00:27:29.320 Eric writes, says, for $25 on his super chat, he says,
00:27:33.800 looks to me like Operation Space Boner is going way better than China was expecting.
00:27:38.460 Well, I don't know what it all means.
00:27:44.800 But do you remember when Jesus was born, there was like a north star,
00:27:51.980 and then the three wise men followed it?
00:27:54.600 And they knew that the star was a sign that, you know, the Lord would be born.
00:27:59.860 But just before this baby gibbon had its immaculate conception,
00:28:07.060 in the sky we were talking about two things.
00:28:10.160 One thing shaped like a big egg,
00:28:13.380 the Chinese spy balloon shaped like a big egg,
00:28:15.800 and the other thing shaped like a big penis.
00:28:19.220 So in the sky, three wise men, I have to be at least one of them.
00:28:24.240 Are there two other wise men to join me?
00:28:26.240 And we'll open it to wise non-binaries too.
00:28:30.500 Women, you can be wise women and wise non-binaries.
00:28:34.220 Anything you like.
00:28:36.000 But I saw the signs.
00:28:38.100 I saw the big egg in the sky and the big penis.
00:28:40.820 And I knew that baby gibbon Jesus was being born in a Japanese zoo.
00:28:46.840 That's how I knew.
00:28:48.200 It was sort of obvious if you put the pieces together.
00:28:51.820 All right.
00:28:52.460 My ongoing conversation indirectly with Brett Weinstein and Heather Heyer continues.
00:29:00.860 I think they mentioned something on their podcast.
00:29:03.440 I haven't heard it yet.
00:29:05.460 But somebody was arguing their side
00:29:08.160 and said that the fact that some people can consistently win at poker
00:29:12.820 is evidence that Brett Weinstein could figure out what was right
00:29:20.840 or what was wrong about vaccinations and the pandemic
00:29:24.140 because it's possible to consistently win at poker, but only some people.
00:29:31.500 So if some people can consistently win at poker,
00:29:34.880 therefore, logically, some people could do what Brett and Heather did,
00:29:39.560 but not everybody.
00:29:41.920 Because not everybody can win at poker,
00:29:44.180 but some people can do it consistently,
00:29:46.000 which shows they have a method.
00:29:47.780 Right?
00:29:48.100 If you can do it consistently and it's predictable,
00:29:50.960 that means you have a method.
00:29:53.600 So if Brett can do his thing consistently,
00:29:56.180 that would be a method,
00:29:57.400 and therefore the poker thing proves the point.
00:30:01.000 How many people accept that strong point?
00:30:06.980 Strong point?
00:30:10.420 John says good point.
00:30:13.340 Scott always mispronounces names.
00:30:15.400 That's true.
00:30:16.860 Weinstein and Weinstein,
00:30:18.420 I will never,
00:30:19.760 I promise you I'll never get them straight.
00:30:21.720 And that's on me.
00:30:22.820 That's on me.
00:30:23.760 But I know my limitations.
00:30:25.620 Statistics are a thing, right?
00:30:32.420 All right.
00:30:33.360 So here's the real answer.
00:30:36.960 Poker is an analogy.
00:30:41.040 There's no logic there.
00:30:43.620 There's no logic whatsoever.
00:30:45.780 It's just a story that reminds you of another story.
00:30:49.320 That's all that is.
00:30:50.920 It's a story that reminds you of another story in some way.
00:30:53.940 There's no logic connection at all.
00:30:58.540 Now, let me tell you why the poker analogy doesn't fit.
00:31:02.760 Had it been a good analogy,
00:31:05.160 then it wouldn't matter that it was about poker or anything else.
00:31:08.420 A good analogy might have actually moved things forward.
00:31:13.240 Here's what's wrong with the analogy.
00:31:16.680 Poker is a bounded game with rules.
00:31:21.180 There are just so many things you can do in poker,
00:31:23.320 and that's the only things you can do.
00:31:25.520 You cannot do anything but what the game allows you to do.
00:31:29.040 Now, when you're looking at a bounded set of possibilities,
00:31:33.320 it is quite possible that somebody could figure out a tell or a pattern
00:31:38.340 in which this bounded set of possibilities
00:31:41.020 always operates a certain way, let's say, on average.
00:31:46.020 However, the real world is not a bounded game.
00:31:51.340 The real world has infinite possibilities.
00:31:54.620 So if you compare something where somebody could conquer a limited set of possibilities,
00:32:00.100 you have said absolutely nothing about the real world with unlimited possibilities.
00:32:05.680 In fact, you've proven that the only place you can do it
00:32:10.660 is where the possibilities are bounded.
00:32:14.240 That actually works against the point.
00:32:18.740 If the point is, I can do things in this domain
00:32:22.120 when there's infinite possibilities
00:32:24.380 and new information that could come in, etc.,
00:32:26.860 you can't compare them.
00:32:28.620 So if you fell for that,
00:32:32.280 if when I first described it, you said to yourself,
00:32:34.560 well, that's a good point.
00:32:36.040 Some poker players can win,
00:32:37.440 so therefore maybe Brett has those skills,
00:32:39.960 he's just applied them in a different domain.
00:32:42.020 If you bought that,
00:32:44.640 I hope you learned something.
00:32:46.980 Never compare a bounded set of options
00:32:49.580 to an infinite set of options.
00:32:51.960 It's a real basic comparison mistake.
00:32:57.060 Now, I tell you over and over again
00:32:59.320 that my skill that I learned in two college courses,
00:33:04.280 I know you hate it when I say that,
00:33:06.660 but it is how to compare things.
00:33:09.360 Like I've learned and had jobs
00:33:12.060 in which my only job was to compare the correct two things.
00:33:16.840 So when I tell you that I see people in the wild
00:33:19.780 comparing the wrong things,
00:33:22.560 I'm the expert.
00:33:24.720 So if I see a scientist comparing two things
00:33:27.240 that are obviously the wrong things to compare,
00:33:30.220 I'm the expert.
00:33:32.220 I'm the expert,
00:33:33.440 not the person who made the wrong comparison.
00:33:36.400 For example,
00:33:37.880 some people said,
00:33:39.120 I looked at the risk of the vaccines
00:33:40.640 and made my decision.
00:33:43.260 Anybody who understands decision-making
00:33:45.420 knows that that was an irrational process.
00:33:47.600 Because what you have to compare it to
00:33:49.960 is the other risks,
00:33:51.180 and those were unknown.
00:33:55.600 All right.
00:33:58.060 So that happened.
00:34:01.140 How many of you are bored at CGI movies?
00:34:06.620 Because they all start looking the same.
00:34:09.280 Do you remember when you saw Star Wars
00:34:11.140 for the first time,
00:34:12.020 if you're old enough to remember that?
00:34:14.200 When Star Wars was brand new,
00:34:16.680 the very first one,
00:34:18.800 it was just mind-boggling.
00:34:21.400 Your eyes never shut.
00:34:23.280 You're like,
00:34:23.640 oh, how'd they do that?
00:34:26.000 And then it got better and better
00:34:27.400 until it was Iron Man
00:34:29.000 and all the Marvel stuff.
00:34:31.980 And the first Iron Man was pretty amazing.
00:34:36.060 The first Superman movies,
00:34:39.240 pretty good.
00:34:40.920 Pretty good.
00:34:41.460 But now if I watch a superhero movie,
00:34:44.840 I watched Black Adam recently.
00:34:48.120 Watching it, I think, is an exaggeration.
00:34:50.520 I sort of had it on
00:34:51.620 while I was doing something else.
00:34:53.840 And it was unwatchable.
00:34:56.880 The CGI was, I guess, amazing.
00:35:00.400 But it started to look like every other movie.
00:35:03.740 All right, there's a guy in a tight costume,
00:35:06.760 and he put his hand out,
00:35:08.140 and some stuff came from his hand
00:35:10.440 and made that thing blow up again.
00:35:13.520 Right?
00:35:13.920 So I can't,
00:35:14.720 I don't even watch when I,
00:35:17.160 you know,
00:35:17.400 if I try to watch an action movie,
00:35:19.560 I fast-forward through the CGI.
00:35:22.320 Do you do that?
00:35:23.800 I fast-forward through all the action
00:35:25.640 because it's just boring.
00:35:27.680 It looks like every other movie I've seen.
00:35:29.580 And then I get to the,
00:35:30.860 maybe a dialogue.
00:35:32.700 But if it's a dialogue
00:35:33.880 where it's two characters
00:35:35.340 who are trying to act romantically interested,
00:35:38.080 fast-forward,
00:35:39.440 because there's nothing worse
00:35:40.460 than the movie trying to convince you
00:35:42.560 that the two people love each other
00:35:44.000 so that you'll feel extra bad
00:35:45.900 when one of them dies
00:35:46.880 or is in danger.
00:35:49.200 And I think,
00:35:49.800 no, I don't want to feel extra bad.
00:35:51.400 I don't want to be invested
00:35:52.620 in that character.
00:35:53.420 Fast-forward.
00:35:54.500 Let's just see the funny jokes.
00:35:56.600 And then I'll go to the dialogue
00:35:57.720 where the, you know,
00:35:59.180 the hero is just saying
00:36:01.240 clever retorts.
00:36:03.100 And I'll go,
00:36:04.060 oh, that was good.
00:36:04.900 Clever retort.
00:36:06.040 I could watch that.
00:36:08.360 But here's where this is all going.
00:36:09.940 It's not about movies.
00:36:11.680 As you know,
00:36:12.640 AI can make art
00:36:13.860 and it can do it instantly.
00:36:15.960 And in my opinion,
00:36:17.120 it's already way better than humans.
00:36:19.340 Not even close,
00:36:20.300 in my opinion.
00:36:21.340 Now, remember,
00:36:23.260 I'm an artist.
00:36:25.380 Sort of.
00:36:27.140 Sort of.
00:36:28.560 I'm kind of,
00:36:29.440 kind of almost an artist.
00:36:31.160 Cartoonist.
00:36:32.280 Cartoonist.
00:36:33.120 That counts a little bit.
00:36:34.940 A little bit.
00:36:36.220 And in my opinion,
00:36:37.940 AI art is already better
00:36:39.420 than human art by far.
00:36:43.040 And here's what's going to happen.
00:36:44.480 It's going to go the way of CGI.
00:36:47.720 When I looked at examples
00:36:49.660 of AI art,
00:36:51.820 the first time I saw it,
00:36:53.020 I was like,
00:36:53.560 whoa.
00:36:54.960 Just like I did
00:36:55.960 the first time I saw CGI.
00:36:58.580 Whoa.
00:36:59.060 That is amazing.
00:37:01.160 Second time,
00:37:02.420 same thing.
00:37:03.280 Hundredth time,
00:37:04.320 same thing.
00:37:05.400 But already,
00:37:07.400 it's starting to look
00:37:08.540 like not special.
00:37:12.320 Because once you've seen
00:37:13.420 your thousandth
00:37:14.580 really,
00:37:15.800 really good
00:37:16.560 AI art,
00:37:19.200 it just
00:37:19.840 looks like
00:37:21.020 things are supposed
00:37:21.720 to look like that.
00:37:22.860 If you can make something
00:37:24.100 that looks like that,
00:37:25.200 why isn't everybody doing it?
00:37:26.600 It's free.
00:37:27.040 It's instant.
00:37:28.660 So,
00:37:29.300 I think we're getting
00:37:30.580 to the point
00:37:31.040 where visual art,
00:37:33.680 and I'm going to go further,
00:37:36.300 all art
00:37:37.700 will become meaningless
00:37:39.080 very quickly.
00:37:41.980 Probably ten years,
00:37:43.440 but
00:37:43.640 maybe five.
00:37:46.100 Because movies
00:37:47.160 are no longer
00:37:48.160 interesting.
00:37:50.000 And it's going to go
00:37:51.100 the same way.
00:37:51.640 Now,
00:37:53.260 somebody gave me
00:37:54.180 an analogy
00:37:55.420 with this.
00:37:56.580 And as I said,
00:37:57.500 analogies are useless.
00:37:58.960 Somebody said,
00:37:59.460 well,
00:37:59.760 the radio didn't go away
00:38:01.020 when television came in.
00:38:02.940 No.
00:38:04.440 Radio and television
00:38:05.560 were a very
00:38:06.560 small addition
00:38:08.340 to our
00:38:08.980 mental load.
00:38:10.860 Like,
00:38:11.280 it was just something
00:38:11.920 you made a point
00:38:13.060 to look at it
00:38:13.680 once in a while.
00:38:14.960 So,
00:38:15.220 it was always
00:38:15.540 like an exception
00:38:16.280 and special
00:38:17.040 and stuff like that.
00:38:18.140 So,
00:38:18.380 radio was still
00:38:19.040 special.
00:38:20.600 TV was special.
00:38:21.520 But you didn't get
00:38:22.160 too much of either one.
00:38:23.960 Even if you watched
00:38:24.640 a few hours a day,
00:38:25.500 you didn't get
00:38:26.100 that much of either one.
00:38:27.560 But AI will just
00:38:28.660 be everywhere.
00:38:30.500 Like,
00:38:30.800 every piece of art,
00:38:32.600 every piece
00:38:33.720 of entertainment,
00:38:34.960 it'll just be
00:38:35.660 AI created
00:38:36.620 and better than
00:38:37.400 anything
00:38:37.720 that humans
00:38:38.480 can make,
00:38:39.080 eventually.
00:38:39.640 Not yet,
00:38:40.260 but eventually.
00:38:41.700 And you will
00:38:42.780 just get bored.
00:38:44.360 Because everything
00:38:46.080 will be excellent.
00:38:48.740 The reason
00:38:49.760 that art
00:38:50.520 is,
00:38:52.460 you know,
00:38:52.820 special
00:38:53.280 is because
00:38:54.600 it's rare.
00:38:56.400 The reason
00:38:57.200 human art
00:38:57.820 is special
00:38:58.280 is that it's rare.
00:38:59.700 But as soon as
00:39:00.680 AI can make
00:39:02.580 as much as you want
00:39:03.580 for free,
00:39:04.360 it's not rare,
00:39:05.840 and you're going
00:39:06.460 to see it everywhere.
00:39:08.000 It's just going
00:39:08.580 to be everywhere.
00:39:09.680 And you'll be
00:39:10.840 surprised
00:39:11.740 when something
00:39:12.380 doesn't look amazing.
00:39:13.440 it'll, like,
00:39:14.640 stand out.
00:39:15.780 And you'll say
00:39:16.340 to yourself,
00:39:17.220 why did you
00:39:19.020 put this advertisement
00:39:20.260 in this publication
00:39:21.800 when all you had
00:39:23.320 to do is
00:39:23.740 push two buttons
00:39:24.700 and AI could have
00:39:25.620 fixed this for you
00:39:26.400 and it was free?
00:39:27.600 Like,
00:39:27.960 anything that isn't
00:39:29.320 excellent
00:39:29.840 will just look
00:39:31.860 like a mistake.
00:39:33.500 So it'll all
00:39:34.160 be excellent.
00:39:35.400 Yeah.
00:39:35.820 So I think
00:39:36.300 all art
00:39:36.920 will actually
00:39:37.720 go away.
00:39:39.120 art
00:39:41.460 will go away
00:39:42.960 because it can
00:39:44.220 only exist
00:39:45.200 as an exception.
00:39:47.580 Does that make sense?
00:39:49.680 Once there's
00:39:50.440 no such thing
00:39:51.140 as, oh,
00:39:51.620 this one is special,
00:39:52.820 it's just everywhere.
00:39:54.580 Every advertisement
00:39:55.500 is art,
00:39:56.320 every building
00:39:57.080 will be art,
00:39:58.240 every design
00:39:58.920 will be art,
00:39:59.720 every TV show
00:40:00.540 will be AI,
00:40:01.720 and it'll be
00:40:02.160 pretty good.
00:40:03.580 It just,
00:40:04.200 nothing will seem
00:40:05.300 special or interesting.
00:40:06.300 And I think
00:40:08.120 there's probably
00:40:08.620 a biological reason
00:40:09.940 why we're built
00:40:10.560 this way.
00:40:11.880 I believe
00:40:12.380 we are
00:40:12.820 biologically designed
00:40:14.360 to identify
00:40:16.860 a genetic
00:40:18.140 advantage
00:40:18.720 in another human.
00:40:20.720 That makes sense,
00:40:21.760 right?
00:40:22.660 We are genetically
00:40:23.540 evolved,
00:40:24.620 that we can see,
00:40:25.900 oh,
00:40:26.180 that person can
00:40:26.960 shoot a basketball
00:40:27.720 really well.
00:40:28.600 I want to mate
00:40:29.240 with that person.
00:40:30.380 That person is
00:40:31.140 really smart.
00:40:32.480 I want to mate
00:40:32.940 with them.
00:40:33.580 That person can
00:40:34.480 create art.
00:40:35.280 I want to mate
00:40:36.560 with them.
00:40:38.580 So we can spot
00:40:40.400 exceptionalism
00:40:41.780 anywhere.
00:40:42.920 And I often think
00:40:44.120 that when we're
00:40:44.620 looking at art,
00:40:46.040 we're actually
00:40:47.160 thinking about
00:40:48.020 the mating potential
00:40:49.280 of the creator,
00:40:50.960 even though we're
00:40:51.500 not directly
00:40:52.320 thinking of it.
00:40:53.120 That's the thing
00:40:53.980 that's triggering us,
00:40:55.160 is the mating potential
00:40:56.240 of the creator,
00:40:57.660 that they created
00:40:58.300 something amazing.
00:40:59.600 Now,
00:40:59.880 the art itself
00:41:00.560 can also be
00:41:01.600 breathtaking.
00:41:03.200 So let me not
00:41:04.140 take away from the art.
00:41:05.280 The art can be
00:41:06.140 breathtaking.
00:41:07.340 But the only reason
00:41:08.200 we respond to it
00:41:09.420 is that we're
00:41:10.640 seeing a genetic
00:41:12.140 greatness coming
00:41:13.460 through the art.
00:41:14.780 That's my hypothesis.
00:41:17.600 I do think humor
00:41:18.880 will be the last
00:41:20.020 thing that goes
00:41:21.020 to AI,
00:41:22.560 but that when it
00:41:23.600 does,
00:41:23.980 it will be instant.
00:41:26.560 Humor will not
00:41:27.560 go slowly.
00:41:28.620 The moment AI
00:41:30.860 can do humor,
00:41:33.360 it will do it
00:41:34.080 like it will
00:41:35.640 replace people,
00:41:36.860 basically.
00:41:39.640 But we don't know
00:41:40.500 when that will happen.
00:41:41.300 Could happen soon.
00:41:43.300 All right,
00:41:43.780 here's something.
00:41:46.960 I want to see
00:41:47.480 if I can get
00:41:47.920 your agreement on it.
00:41:51.080 You can't sell
00:41:52.480 any idea to the public
00:41:53.960 until they get
00:41:55.740 a little bit
00:41:56.280 used to it.
00:41:58.540 Would you agree
00:41:59.320 with that?
00:42:00.140 That you can't
00:42:01.160 introduce a brand
00:42:02.060 new idea to the
00:42:03.140 public because
00:42:03.820 we reflexively
00:42:06.740 reject anything
00:42:08.520 new.
00:42:09.600 Would you agree?
00:42:10.820 Not every person,
00:42:12.260 not every human,
00:42:13.120 not every situation,
00:42:14.380 but as a public,
00:42:16.420 we reject everything
00:42:17.920 new the first time
00:42:19.100 you hear it.
00:42:19.600 But over time,
00:42:21.280 would you agree
00:42:22.380 that if you hear
00:42:23.680 an idea enough,
00:42:25.120 it starts to make sense?
00:42:27.340 Do you remember
00:42:27.980 the first time
00:42:28.540 you heard about
00:42:29.180 reparations for slavery?
00:42:31.860 The first time.
00:42:34.280 Did you say,
00:42:35.220 well, that's not
00:42:35.720 going to happen.
00:42:37.060 Nobody's going
00:42:37.660 to take that seriously.
00:42:39.200 Right?
00:42:39.620 But then you just
00:42:40.360 kept hearing it
00:42:41.180 and hearing it
00:42:41.880 and hearing it
00:42:42.460 and now there are
00:42:43.460 committees looking
00:42:44.960 into a formula
00:42:46.040 for it.
00:42:47.780 Like suddenly,
00:42:48.740 it went from
00:42:49.540 a ridiculous idea
00:42:50.820 to it just got
00:42:52.420 socialized
00:42:53.300 and became part
00:42:54.200 of the fabric
00:42:54.780 and now it's normal.
00:42:57.160 Think back to
00:42:58.340 when you first
00:43:00.000 heard that Trump
00:43:01.760 had privately
00:43:02.620 asked his defense
00:43:03.960 secretary, I think,
00:43:05.460 about the option
00:43:06.380 of attacking
00:43:08.240 the cartels
00:43:09.000 directly, militarily.
00:43:10.740 Do you remember
00:43:11.320 what your first
00:43:12.220 reaction was?
00:43:14.120 Holy cow,
00:43:15.620 you can't do that.
00:43:17.000 That would be
00:43:17.460 an invasion of Mexico.
00:43:18.720 That's not going
00:43:19.160 to happen.
00:43:19.540 And the news
00:43:20.960 treated it
00:43:21.680 like Trump
00:43:22.780 was basically
00:43:23.420 a crazy person.
00:43:25.300 Right?
00:43:26.620 Well,
00:43:27.640 I brought up
00:43:29.560 the idea
00:43:30.040 a number of times
00:43:30.860 and when I brought
00:43:31.920 it up initially,
00:43:33.160 I got the same
00:43:34.280 response,
00:43:35.760 which is,
00:43:36.400 yeah,
00:43:38.180 no,
00:43:38.640 you can't attack
00:43:40.200 your neighboring
00:43:40.700 country.
00:43:41.580 You can't do that.
00:43:43.380 How about now?
00:43:44.180 How about today?
00:43:46.620 Today it's an option,
00:43:49.760 isn't it?
00:43:51.080 It's an absolute option.
00:43:53.180 And politicians
00:43:54.520 are talking about it
00:43:55.500 out loud.
00:43:57.020 It's actually being
00:43:58.000 discussed out loud
00:43:59.740 by traditional
00:44:01.240 politicians.
00:44:04.640 That's where we need
00:44:08.200 to get to get
00:44:09.540 anything done
00:44:10.160 about the border
00:44:11.480 and about fentanyl.
00:44:12.500 You have to get
00:44:13.520 to the point
00:44:13.920 where it feels
00:44:15.000 normal
00:44:15.540 that our military
00:44:17.440 would take out
00:44:18.400 the cartels.
00:44:19.860 And it's getting there.
00:44:21.700 So I was asking
00:44:22.660 these provocative
00:44:24.060 questions on Twitter
00:44:25.680 and let me start
00:44:27.860 by saying
00:44:28.340 I do not recommend
00:44:29.640 vigilantism
00:44:30.700 or killing anybody.
00:44:32.700 So I do not
00:44:33.880 recommend violence.
00:44:34.960 I'm just predicting.
00:44:36.840 Predicting.
00:44:37.320 If things get worse
00:44:39.160 with fentanyl
00:44:39.900 sooner or later
00:44:41.840 a bunch of dads
00:44:42.780 with ARs
00:44:43.660 are going to
00:44:44.200 surround a fentanyl
00:44:45.480 dealer's house
00:44:46.120 and light it up.
00:44:47.720 It's going to happen.
00:44:49.440 Sooner or later.
00:44:50.840 And it's going to
00:44:51.780 feel like
00:44:52.360 there was a good
00:44:54.180 reason for it.
00:44:56.020 Now
00:44:56.380 when I asked
00:44:58.180 when I was
00:44:59.580 provocatively saying
00:45:00.880 can an American
00:45:02.000 citizen
00:45:02.580 kill
00:45:03.920 a member
00:45:04.720 of the cartel
00:45:05.520 if they find
00:45:06.280 them on American
00:45:06.960 soil
00:45:07.340 even if
00:45:08.660 they're not
00:45:09.040 in the act
00:45:09.700 of threatening
00:45:10.200 anybody.
00:45:11.240 Can you just
00:45:11.860 kill them
00:45:12.380 for being
00:45:12.980 an enemy
00:45:13.620 invader
00:45:14.780 on your land
00:45:15.820 in a hot war?
00:45:18.780 And almost
00:45:19.460 everybody said
00:45:20.260 yes.
00:45:22.500 Think about that.
00:45:24.680 I asked
00:45:25.680 if Americans
00:45:26.460 should be allowed
00:45:27.440 to kill
00:45:28.440 fentanyl
00:45:30.640 dealers
00:45:31.000 and let's
00:45:32.340 say cartel
00:45:33.060 members
00:45:33.460 on American
00:45:34.440 soil
00:45:34.780 if they're
00:45:35.480 not actively
00:45:36.460 threatening
00:45:37.060 somebody
00:45:37.460 at that
00:45:37.800 moment.
00:45:38.620 And a lot
00:45:39.000 of people
00:45:39.280 said absolutely.
00:45:40.740 Yeah you
00:45:41.040 could kill
00:45:41.380 that person.
00:45:42.520 That would
00:45:42.800 be self
00:45:43.320 defense
00:45:43.820 in every
00:45:44.520 definition.
00:45:46.940 Now in
00:45:47.200 my opinion
00:45:48.120 it should
00:45:48.660 be legal.
00:45:50.480 So I
00:45:51.120 don't recommend
00:45:51.760 it because
00:45:52.140 I don't think
00:45:52.700 it's legal.
00:45:54.220 But in my
00:45:54.840 opinion we
00:45:55.540 should change
00:45:56.060 the law
00:45:56.460 and make
00:45:56.820 that legal
00:45:57.360 because it's
00:45:58.520 going to
00:45:58.720 happen anyway.
00:46:00.680 You just
00:46:01.280 have to make
00:46:01.720 sure the dads
00:46:02.320 get pushed
00:46:02.800 far enough.
00:46:03.380 You know
00:46:04.460 what I
00:46:04.620 mean?
00:46:05.120 And by
00:46:05.620 the way
00:46:05.860 this is a
00:46:06.440 case where
00:46:06.900 I'm not
00:46:07.260 going to
00:46:07.440 say internet
00:46:08.540 dads includes
00:46:09.720 women and
00:46:10.500 everybody else.
00:46:11.940 This does
00:46:12.640 not include
00:46:13.140 women.
00:46:14.560 If ever
00:46:15.540 there's this
00:46:16.060 situation and
00:46:16.820 I predict
00:46:17.280 it will
00:46:17.520 happen I
00:46:17.960 don't
00:46:18.140 recommend it
00:46:18.800 I don't
00:46:19.760 promote it
00:46:20.360 don't
00:46:20.700 recommend it
00:46:21.360 but the
00:46:22.600 government has
00:46:23.280 checked out.
00:46:24.860 The government
00:46:25.300 is allowing
00:46:25.940 the invasion
00:46:26.800 to happen.
00:46:29.840 It looks like
00:46:30.360 they're promoting
00:46:30.900 it.
00:46:32.100 So I
00:46:32.460 mean their
00:46:32.780 actions would
00:46:33.420 suggest that
00:46:33.980 they want it
00:46:34.540 rather than
00:46:35.020 they want to
00:46:35.500 stop it.
00:46:36.700 So I think
00:46:37.620 that the
00:46:38.140 inevitable outcome
00:46:39.240 of that will
00:46:40.680 be there will
00:46:41.140 be enough
00:46:41.540 people who
00:46:42.000 have personally
00:46:42.640 lost somebody
00:46:43.340 to fentanyl
00:46:44.020 that they're
00:46:45.040 just going to
00:46:45.520 surround a
00:46:46.660 deal or location
00:46:47.480 and just take
00:46:48.280 them out.
00:46:49.480 And there
00:46:50.060 will be the
00:46:50.600 beginning.
00:46:52.480 Now here's
00:46:52.900 the other thing
00:46:53.360 that's really
00:46:53.820 pissing me
00:46:54.540 off.
00:46:56.320 How many
00:46:57.060 right wing
00:46:58.320 militias are
00:47:00.900 there?
00:47:03.440 You can
00:47:04.140 stop worrying
00:47:04.840 about your
00:47:05.340 right wing
00:47:05.820 militias.
00:47:07.340 Like if you're
00:47:07.920 on the left
00:47:08.420 and you're
00:47:08.780 worried about
00:47:09.180 right wing
00:47:09.680 militias,
00:47:11.680 they're not
00:47:13.140 doing anything
00:47:13.640 about an
00:47:14.120 invasion.
00:47:15.720 There's an
00:47:16.380 actual invasion
00:47:17.300 of the country
00:47:18.040 right now
00:47:19.380 and there
00:47:20.360 isn't one
00:47:21.240 frickin'
00:47:22.540 militia
00:47:23.000 who has
00:47:23.900 organized to
00:47:24.680 stop it.
00:47:26.480 None.
00:47:28.200 And you're
00:47:28.580 worried about
00:47:29.060 them?
00:47:29.260 They could
00:47:31.460 not be
00:47:31.860 more
00:47:32.100 toothless.
00:47:33.740 Clearly
00:47:34.120 this is
00:47:34.680 LARPing
00:47:35.280 and some
00:47:36.440 kind of
00:47:36.740 lifestyle
00:47:37.220 preference.
00:47:38.340 Clearly
00:47:38.700 the militias
00:47:39.440 are not
00:47:40.000 here to
00:47:40.380 protect
00:47:40.760 anything.
00:47:41.980 If they
00:47:42.340 were here
00:47:42.640 to protect
00:47:43.180 anything,
00:47:44.140 they would
00:47:44.740 be organizing
00:47:45.340 against the
00:47:45.980 cartels.
00:47:46.960 They'd be
00:47:47.420 doing what
00:47:47.860 the government
00:47:48.400 is not
00:47:48.960 doing for
00:47:49.520 them,
00:47:49.860 which is
00:47:50.280 protecting
00:47:50.700 the country.
00:47:52.080 Again,
00:47:52.760 I don't
00:47:53.060 recommend
00:47:53.500 militias.
00:47:54.200 I don't
00:47:54.460 recommend
00:47:54.800 that they
00:47:55.200 act in
00:47:55.980 any way.
00:47:56.340 I'm just
00:47:57.140 saying that
00:47:58.640 the country
00:47:59.280 is now
00:47:59.940 ready for
00:48:01.020 direct
00:48:01.640 violence.
00:48:03.960 And I
00:48:04.560 don't care
00:48:04.980 if they're
00:48:05.300 in the
00:48:05.540 country or
00:48:06.000 not.
00:48:07.140 I'm not
00:48:07.560 recommending
00:48:08.020 it.
00:48:08.680 I'm saying
00:48:09.080 what I
00:48:09.400 care about.
00:48:11.000 So,
00:48:11.820 to be
00:48:12.540 perfectly
00:48:13.040 clear,
00:48:13.960 I would
00:48:14.440 love every
00:48:15.060 American
00:48:15.420 citizen to
00:48:16.160 say in
00:48:16.540 public that
00:48:17.840 they would
00:48:18.220 not vote
00:48:19.460 to convict
00:48:20.220 if they
00:48:20.520 were on a
00:48:20.900 jury.
00:48:21.700 They would
00:48:22.180 never
00:48:22.440 convict an
00:48:23.140 American for
00:48:23.860 killing a
00:48:24.360 cartel
00:48:24.740 member in
00:48:25.360 the United
00:48:27.460 States or
00:48:28.220 even in
00:48:28.580 Mexico.
00:48:31.120 I'd like
00:48:31.820 to see if
00:48:33.420 we have
00:48:33.840 anybody in
00:48:34.520 Congress who
00:48:35.280 isn't useless,
00:48:37.600 I'd like to
00:48:38.180 see one of
00:48:38.680 them propose
00:48:39.580 a law,
00:48:40.440 a federal
00:48:40.840 law,
00:48:42.120 that says
00:48:42.740 that if
00:48:43.120 you kill a
00:48:43.620 cartel
00:48:44.020 member on
00:48:45.060 American soil,
00:48:45.920 it's legal
00:48:46.380 under any
00:48:48.040 condition.
00:48:49.440 You don't
00:48:49.980 have to be
00:48:50.380 directly
00:48:50.740 threatened.
00:48:52.680 Now,
00:48:53.100 such a
00:48:53.600 law could
00:48:54.040 never be
00:48:54.540 passed.
00:48:55.220 Would you
00:48:55.560 agree?
00:48:56.580 There's no
00:48:57.180 way Congress
00:48:57.780 would pass
00:48:58.360 a law like
00:48:58.820 that because
00:48:59.180 it would be
00:48:59.560 violence in
00:49:00.360 the streets.
00:49:01.440 But we
00:49:02.100 should have
00:49:02.440 the conversation.
00:49:04.520 We should
00:49:05.200 have the
00:49:05.640 conversation
00:49:06.240 about killing
00:49:07.820 cartel
00:49:08.640 members on
00:49:09.480 American soil,
00:49:10.820 citizens doing
00:49:11.940 it.
00:49:12.740 Because our
00:49:13.460 government has
00:49:14.120 abandoned us.
00:49:15.820 The government
00:49:16.760 has abandoned
00:49:17.760 you.
00:49:18.680 They are not
00:49:19.400 working to
00:49:19.960 protect you.
00:49:21.460 And if we
00:49:22.280 can't do that
00:49:22.940 ourselves,
00:49:23.500 we should
00:49:24.660 at least
00:49:24.960 ask why
00:49:25.440 not.
00:49:26.900 I'd like
00:49:27.760 to see
00:49:28.100 somebody do
00:49:29.380 a public
00:49:29.840 argument telling
00:49:31.480 us why we
00:49:32.220 can't do
00:49:32.760 that.
00:49:34.080 Now,
00:49:34.580 we can't do
00:49:35.040 it because
00:49:35.360 it's illegal,
00:49:36.000 and I
00:49:36.560 vigorously
00:49:37.440 recommend you
00:49:38.720 don't do
00:49:39.080 anything like
00:49:39.760 that.
00:49:40.440 But we
00:49:41.100 should have
00:49:41.440 a conversation
00:49:42.080 about making
00:49:42.640 it legal.
00:49:44.460 Because if
00:49:45.240 the government
00:49:45.680 is abandoning
00:49:46.380 you, you
00:49:47.680 have the
00:49:48.200 absolute
00:49:48.840 right of
00:49:49.440 self-defense.
00:49:51.260 There is
00:49:52.020 no wiggle
00:49:54.100 room.
00:49:55.240 And right
00:49:55.500 now, the
00:49:55.860 government's
00:49:56.480 laws are
00:49:57.840 denying you
00:49:58.720 your natural
00:49:59.520 right of
00:50:00.480 self-defense.
00:50:02.000 You have a
00:50:02.460 natural right
00:50:03.040 to self-defense.
00:50:04.200 That's the
00:50:04.600 only natural
00:50:05.180 right I think
00:50:05.720 I believe
00:50:06.260 in.
00:50:07.940 I'm not a
00:50:08.760 big fan of
00:50:09.360 a thing called
00:50:10.000 natural rights,
00:50:10.820 but the
00:50:11.840 one that's
00:50:13.000 unambiguous
00:50:13.720 is self-defense.
00:50:17.600 Like, you
00:50:18.180 don't even
00:50:18.460 have to call
00:50:19.020 it a right
00:50:19.580 to say that
00:50:20.960 you agree
00:50:21.400 with it.
00:50:21.780 It just
00:50:22.080 is.
00:50:22.920 Like, that's
00:50:23.380 not something
00:50:23.760 you debate.
00:50:25.020 Self-defense
00:50:25.760 is not
00:50:27.080 a debate.
00:50:30.500 But I'd
00:50:31.140 like to see
00:50:31.560 the people
00:50:32.300 who are
00:50:32.520 against it
00:50:33.080 try.
00:50:34.120 I'd like to
00:50:34.780 see what
00:50:35.020 that looks
00:50:35.340 like.
00:50:37.040 All right,
00:50:37.660 so my main
00:50:38.220 point on this
00:50:38.920 is that the
00:50:39.520 American attitude
00:50:40.520 is changing
00:50:41.360 and it's
00:50:42.560 going to
00:50:43.140 lead to
00:50:43.660 something.
00:50:45.300 And my
00:50:46.260 prediction is
00:50:47.080 it's going
00:50:48.560 to be
00:50:48.720 violent.
00:50:50.060 It has to
00:50:50.880 be.
00:50:53.600 All right,
00:50:54.760 what else
00:50:55.800 is happening?
00:50:56.720 I think
00:50:57.120 that's about
00:50:57.600 it.
00:50:59.780 Probably
00:51:00.260 the best
00:51:01.040 live stream
00:51:01.580 you'll ever
00:51:01.960 see in your
00:51:02.400 life.
00:51:03.840 Now,
00:51:04.360 remember I
00:51:04.800 told you,
00:51:05.300 and I'll
00:51:05.580 tell you
00:51:05.960 again,
00:51:06.740 that AI
00:51:07.540 is going
00:51:10.020 to change
00:51:10.400 everything
00:51:10.840 in a way
00:51:13.180 we cannot
00:51:13.960 predict,
00:51:15.080 cannot
00:51:15.440 predict.
00:51:19.320 But this
00:51:20.220 UFO thing
00:51:20.960 is interesting
00:51:21.540 in its
00:51:22.240 timing,
00:51:22.780 isn't it?
00:51:24.360 If you
00:51:25.180 were another
00:51:27.000 civilization,
00:51:28.240 let's say
00:51:28.540 an advanced
00:51:29.060 civilization,
00:51:30.280 and you
00:51:30.600 had been
00:51:30.900 watching Earth
00:51:31.680 for hundreds
00:51:33.140 of years
00:51:33.640 or whatever,
00:51:35.240 would you
00:51:36.020 contact the
00:51:37.100 citizens
00:51:37.560 before they
00:51:39.160 had AI
00:51:39.840 or is
00:51:41.540 the
00:51:41.740 introduction
00:51:42.200 of AI,
00:51:43.000 which let's
00:51:43.660 speculate they
00:51:45.020 know is
00:51:45.440 happening,
00:51:46.280 would that
00:51:46.880 be the
00:51:47.240 time you
00:51:47.720 made
00:51:47.920 contact?
00:51:49.620 Because that's
00:51:50.260 a weird
00:51:50.540 coincidence,
00:51:51.000 isn't it?
00:51:51.880 That our
00:51:52.500 UFO hysteria
00:51:53.640 is at a
00:51:55.480 peak at
00:51:56.080 exactly the
00:51:56.780 same time
00:51:57.420 the AI is
00:51:58.560 becoming
00:51:58.860 conscious.
00:52:00.400 I don't
00:52:01.000 know.
00:52:01.320 That would
00:52:01.560 be sort
00:52:02.060 of a big
00:52:02.420 coincidence if
00:52:03.360 those two
00:52:03.840 things were
00:52:04.360 happening.
00:52:04.700 Now, I'm
00:52:05.640 still going
00:52:06.000 to go
00:52:06.240 with the
00:52:06.700 UFOs
00:52:07.440 are all
00:52:07.700 fake.
00:52:09.380 So, in
00:52:10.380 case you
00:52:12.020 want to
00:52:12.400 know where
00:52:13.180 I stand,
00:52:13.640 I believe
00:52:14.040 all of the
00:52:14.720 UFOs are
00:52:15.300 fake in
00:52:16.600 terms of
00:52:17.020 aliens.
00:52:17.520 I don't
00:52:17.800 believe
00:52:18.040 aliens are
00:52:18.580 on Earth.
00:52:20.080 But,
00:52:20.920 if there
00:52:22.900 are aliens,
00:52:26.220 the version
00:52:27.380 I prefer
00:52:28.140 is that
00:52:29.800 they've
00:52:30.060 always been
00:52:30.560 here,
00:52:32.100 always
00:52:32.460 meaning
00:52:33.160 since the
00:52:33.740 beginning of
00:52:34.160 people.
00:52:34.700 but they
00:52:35.340 had to
00:52:35.580 get here
00:52:35.840 somewhere.
00:52:36.820 Yeah.
00:52:37.220 My preference
00:52:38.580 is that
00:52:39.320 they've always
00:52:39.820 been here
00:52:40.240 on Earth
00:52:40.700 and that
00:52:42.080 they live
00:52:42.440 underwater.
00:52:46.320 That's all.
00:52:47.500 They just
00:52:47.880 live underwater.
00:52:50.120 And the
00:52:50.980 reason we
00:52:51.380 can't find
00:52:51.860 them is they
00:52:52.360 live in
00:52:52.720 deep water
00:52:53.300 and it's
00:52:54.420 just deeper
00:52:55.240 than we
00:52:55.620 can detect.
00:52:59.520 Yeah.
00:53:00.220 Now, I
00:53:00.720 would not
00:53:01.520 bet on
00:53:01.920 that.
00:53:02.860 Yeah.
00:53:03.040 Or maybe
00:53:03.480 they're like
00:53:04.400 Atlantis
00:53:05.620 or something
00:53:05.980 like that.
00:53:06.560 Now, I
00:53:06.920 wouldn't bet
00:53:07.260 on that.
00:53:08.160 I would put
00:53:08.820 zero dollars
00:53:09.640 to bet
00:53:10.020 that that's
00:53:10.460 true.
00:53:11.640 But, if
00:53:12.440 there are
00:53:12.900 aliens, it
00:53:14.180 seems more
00:53:14.700 likely that
00:53:15.500 their travel
00:53:16.120 time is
00:53:18.260 limited.
00:53:20.580 It feels
00:53:21.400 like to
00:53:22.500 have a lot
00:53:23.060 of activity
00:53:23.720 would sort
00:53:25.600 of indicate
00:53:26.160 they're here.
00:53:26.740 if we
00:53:28.200 saw one
00:53:28.760 thing once
00:53:29.580 that would
00:53:30.820 suggest it
00:53:31.900 was one
00:53:32.520 ship from
00:53:33.160 a distant
00:53:33.920 planet.
00:53:35.420 But if
00:53:35.780 there's
00:53:36.100 stuff swirling
00:53:37.460 around and
00:53:38.040 has been for
00:53:38.620 years, just
00:53:40.000 aliens all
00:53:40.640 over the
00:53:40.960 place, well,
00:53:42.340 then I'd
00:53:42.720 suggest maybe
00:53:43.360 they're already
00:53:43.800 here just
00:53:44.740 because of
00:53:45.140 the commute
00:53:45.720 time.
00:53:49.540 Some are
00:53:50.340 interdimensional.
00:53:51.960 Maybe so.
00:53:52.760 Maybe so.
00:53:55.820 Maybe they're
00:53:57.600 just different
00:53:58.080 game players.
00:53:59.780 Maybe this
00:54:00.500 simulation exists
00:54:01.620 but people are
00:54:02.500 playing different
00:54:03.120 games on the
00:54:03.780 same field.
00:54:05.140 Because it's
00:54:05.580 expensive,
00:54:06.440 relatively, to
00:54:07.800 create an
00:54:08.320 entire environment.
00:54:10.020 But once you've
00:54:10.560 created it, maybe
00:54:11.900 the people who
00:54:13.300 created it said,
00:54:13.880 oh, let's
00:54:14.180 introduce some
00:54:14.740 aliens and
00:54:15.560 we'll put some
00:54:16.760 animals and
00:54:17.700 some people.
00:54:18.760 And you could
00:54:19.280 inhabit any of
00:54:20.160 them.
00:54:21.440 So as a
00:54:22.000 game player, you
00:54:22.700 could be a
00:54:23.980 human character
00:54:24.720 or an alien
00:54:25.820 character who
00:54:26.520 is visiting.
00:54:29.820 Now, how
00:54:30.520 many of you
00:54:30.940 think the
00:54:31.340 alien stuff is
00:54:32.280 an intentional
00:54:33.660 distraction?
00:54:34.580 It's an obvious
00:54:35.140 distraction.
00:54:36.240 But do you
00:54:36.780 think it's a
00:54:37.560 government-intended
00:54:39.140 distraction?
00:54:42.160 I don't see
00:54:43.220 any evidence
00:54:44.360 of that.
00:54:46.380 What I see
00:54:47.280 is a government
00:54:48.020 that doesn't
00:54:48.580 know how to
00:54:49.040 deal with
00:54:49.440 whatever the
00:54:49.880 hell is
00:54:50.120 happening.
00:54:51.120 All I see
00:54:51.920 is incompetence.
00:54:52.700 and uncertainty.
00:54:55.860 That's all
00:54:56.660 I see.
00:54:58.220 If you think
00:54:59.160 that the
00:54:59.860 collection of
00:55:00.980 uncertainty and
00:55:01.880 stupidity
00:55:02.500 indicates a
00:55:04.200 ultra-capable
00:55:05.260 government that
00:55:06.600 has secrets,
00:55:08.320 maybe.
00:55:11.940 Maybe they're
00:55:12.920 ultra-capable
00:55:13.860 and ultra-capable
00:55:15.320 of keeping
00:55:15.820 secrets.
00:55:17.340 Maybe.
00:55:17.940 But what is
00:55:19.940 more likely?
00:55:21.360 It's more
00:55:22.060 likely that you're
00:55:22.960 just seeing a
00:55:23.420 bunch of
00:55:23.760 uncertainty and
00:55:24.700 incompetence and
00:55:25.580 space garbage.
00:55:27.380 It's probably
00:55:27.800 just space
00:55:28.260 garbage.
00:55:29.340 It's probably
00:55:29.720 just weather
00:55:31.280 balloons that
00:55:32.240 are deactivated
00:55:34.540 that just never
00:55:35.160 came down.
00:55:36.780 Don't you think?
00:55:37.720 Plastic bags,
00:55:38.740 weather balloons.
00:55:40.020 I think we're just
00:55:40.960 going to find out
00:55:41.540 that there's some
00:55:42.040 kind of debris
00:55:42.700 in space.
00:55:43.980 It always has
00:55:44.620 been.
00:55:47.080 Always in
00:55:48.240 modern times,
00:55:48.920 anyway.
00:55:53.220 We were
00:55:53.940 capable enough
00:55:54.780 to blow up
00:55:55.280 the Nord Stream.
00:55:56.380 Well, I do
00:55:57.460 believe that
00:55:58.020 Americans are
00:55:58.800 capable of
00:55:59.700 blowing shit
00:56:00.420 up.
00:56:02.460 Yeah.
00:56:03.340 If you gave
00:56:04.540 us one task,
00:56:05.560 say, all right,
00:56:06.480 here are a
00:56:07.020 hundred tasks.
00:56:08.980 Number one
00:56:09.720 task, I'd like
00:56:10.980 you to work
00:56:11.440 out this
00:56:11.820 reparations thing
00:56:12.880 so all the
00:56:13.460 public is happy.
00:56:15.100 Probably not
00:56:16.480 so good at
00:56:17.120 that.
00:56:17.840 Number two,
00:56:18.660 we'd like you
00:56:19.240 to change your
00:56:20.300 spending habits
00:56:21.080 to bring down
00:56:22.500 the inflation
00:56:23.380 and national
00:56:24.000 debt.
00:56:25.520 Probably not
00:56:27.060 so good at
00:56:27.620 that.
00:56:28.640 We'd like you
00:56:29.260 to change
00:56:30.880 the racial
00:56:32.240 animosity in
00:56:33.680 this country
00:56:34.120 and bring down
00:56:34.700 the temperature.
00:56:36.780 Not so good.
00:56:38.820 Now, let's
00:56:39.380 say we give
00:56:40.080 them the
00:56:40.420 tenth task,
00:56:41.300 which is,
00:56:42.600 we'd like you
00:56:43.120 to blow up
00:56:43.720 some shit.
00:56:45.640 Do you want
00:56:46.300 it to blow
00:56:46.800 up in a
00:56:47.220 certain way?
00:56:48.600 No, no,
00:56:49.700 just blow the
00:56:51.040 shit out of
00:56:51.540 it.
00:56:52.640 Do you think
00:56:53.160 America can do
00:56:54.140 that?
00:56:55.720 Yes, we can.
00:56:57.140 Yes, we can.
00:56:58.340 We can blow up
00:56:59.380 something no matter
00:57:00.220 where it is.
00:57:01.500 We can find
00:57:02.360 shit in space
00:57:03.180 and blow it up.
00:57:04.400 We can find
00:57:05.060 things you didn't
00:57:05.660 even know existed
00:57:06.440 and we'll blow
00:57:07.140 that up too.
00:57:08.280 There isn't
00:57:08.800 anything we can't
00:57:09.560 blow up.
00:57:10.020 You got a
00:57:10.960 bridge, we'll
00:57:11.640 take it out.
00:57:12.540 You got a
00:57:13.080 jet, we'll
00:57:13.800 blow it up.
00:57:14.880 You got a
00:57:15.500 building, we'll
00:57:16.160 take it, we'll
00:57:16.900 take it, we'll
00:57:17.380 blow it up.
00:57:18.420 Yeah, blowing
00:57:19.580 stuff up is
00:57:20.560 what we can
00:57:20.980 do.
00:57:24.480 High altitude,
00:57:25.820 Pentagon
00:57:26.420 testing mass
00:57:27.500 surveillance balloons
00:57:28.460 across the U.S.
00:57:32.040 So this is
00:57:32.780 from 2019.
00:57:34.440 The Pentagon
00:57:34.960 was testing
00:57:35.940 mass
00:57:36.760 surveillance
00:57:38.060 balloons across
00:57:38.900 the U.S.
00:57:41.540 Now this
00:57:42.380 article was
00:57:43.040 in The Guardian
00:57:43.600 so who
00:57:44.500 knows how
00:57:44.940 reliable it
00:57:45.620 is.
00:57:46.440 But that
00:57:49.180 would fit
00:57:49.880 my hypothesis.
00:57:52.340 My hypothesis
00:57:53.120 is that there's
00:57:54.000 just tons of
00:57:54.620 shit floating
00:57:55.140 around up
00:57:55.620 there.
00:57:56.460 Some of it
00:57:57.100 is just
00:57:57.780 garbage, some
00:57:58.500 of it we
00:57:59.060 know about.
00:58:00.300 But probably
00:58:01.080 we have to
00:58:01.620 shoot down
00:58:02.100 our own
00:58:02.680 surveillance
00:58:03.600 balloons just
00:58:05.100 to show that
00:58:05.620 we're not
00:58:05.960 weak.
00:58:06.240 I feel
00:58:08.640 like Canada
00:58:09.200 was like,
00:58:09.940 hey, hey,
00:58:10.860 can you
00:58:11.200 shoot down
00:58:11.540 one of our
00:58:12.080 balloons?
00:58:13.700 Because we
00:58:14.340 don't want to
00:58:15.280 look weak.
00:58:16.700 We want to
00:58:17.400 look feminine.
00:58:18.520 So we're
00:58:19.120 going to ask
00:58:19.400 the big strong
00:58:20.000 United States
00:58:20.580 to shoot it
00:58:21.060 down for us.
00:58:22.720 Thanks, guys.
00:58:25.440 All right.
00:58:28.920 Careful.
00:58:29.680 Scott is an
00:58:30.280 FBI informant.
00:58:31.400 You're being
00:58:31.880 warned in the
00:58:32.560 comments.
00:58:32.920 that's totally
00:58:35.000 likely.
00:58:37.080 All right.
00:58:40.700 That might be
00:58:41.840 totally what's
00:58:42.400 happening.
00:58:42.940 Yeah, I'm not
00:58:43.440 joking.
00:58:44.460 When I say
00:58:45.280 that we may
00:58:45.920 have intentionally
00:58:46.780 shot down one
00:58:47.820 of our own
00:58:48.500 assets to make
00:58:50.120 it look like
00:58:50.800 Biden is
00:58:51.520 decisive and
00:58:52.540 our military
00:58:53.800 is capable,
00:58:54.820 that's a real
00:58:55.860 thing.
00:58:57.040 I would say
00:58:57.860 that's at
00:58:58.240 least 40%
00:59:01.240 likely.
00:59:02.920 maybe not
00:59:04.840 the most
00:59:05.320 likely thing,
00:59:06.240 but it's at
00:59:06.640 least 40%
00:59:07.500 likely we
00:59:08.220 knew we
00:59:08.580 were shooting
00:59:08.960 down our
00:59:09.380 own asset
00:59:09.920 just to
00:59:11.760 look tough.
00:59:12.980 If we were
00:59:14.000 unmanned,
00:59:14.720 it would be
00:59:15.060 a pretty
00:59:15.420 inexpensive way
00:59:16.380 to boost
00:59:17.660 your military
00:59:18.460 preparedness
00:59:19.720 illusion.
00:59:22.780 All right.
00:59:25.500 YouTube,
00:59:26.180 I think we're
00:59:26.660 done here.
00:59:27.680 I'm going to
00:59:28.020 go talk
00:59:28.780 privately to
00:59:29.500 the local
00:59:30.720 subscribers.
00:59:32.920 But on
00:59:34.920 YouTube,
00:59:35.480 you can do
00:59:35.900 me a favor
00:59:36.380 and hit
00:59:37.620 the subscribe
00:59:38.360 button.
00:59:39.900 Turns out
00:59:40.400 that that's
00:59:40.780 useful,
00:59:41.420 so hit that
00:59:41.840 subscribe button
00:59:42.600 if you like.
00:59:44.400 And I'll see
00:59:47.140 you tomorrow
00:59:47.520 on YouTube,
00:59:48.540 and we'll talk
00:59:49.180 to the local
00:59:50.000 people for a
00:59:50.660 bit.
00:59:51.220 Bye for now.
00:59:52.460 Best live
00:59:52.980 stream you've
00:59:53.460 ever seen.
00:59:53.880 because of
00:59:55.420 this
00:59:55.760 time
00:59:56.760 I'm out.
00:59:56.940 And I'll see you
00:59:57.600 wo cone up
00:59:58.480 And that's
00:59:59.300 whatever
00:59:59.880 is going to be
01:00:01.880 going to happen.
01:00:03.860 I'm going to
01:00:04.540 wait for you
01:00:05.160 to go
01:00:07.160 and let's
01:00:07.900 say
01:00:08.000 and
01:00:08.720 go
01:00:09.360 out.