Real Coffee with Scott Adams - February 19, 2023


Episode 2024 Scott Adams： How To Stop Poor White People With Legacy Genitalia From Having All Power？


Episode Stats

Length

53 minutes

Words per Minute

135.91325

Word Count

7,270

Sentence Count

556

Misogynist Sentences

13

Hate Speech Sentences

18


Summary

On this week's episode of The Daily Show with Stephen Colbert, we discuss the latest in the Trump administration, including the latest on the latest "Save America" campaign slogan, and why it might be the perfect campaign slogan for the 2020 election.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Do-do-do-do-do-do.
00:00:02.800 Do-do-do.
00:00:04.420 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of civilization.
00:00:09.960 Ooh, do I look more official when I hold a pen like this and gesture with it?
00:00:14.080 Well, if you're only listening on audio, you're missing the wonderness of me waving this pen around like a wand.
00:00:22.240 Now, would you like to take this experience past Harry Potter magic wand territory
00:00:27.900 all the way to the muggles-will-never-know-what-we're-up-to territory?
00:00:33.260 Yes, you would.
00:00:34.220 And for that, all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass,
00:00:37.520 a tank or a chalice or a canteen, a canteen, a jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:41.320 Fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:00:43.400 I like coffee.
00:00:45.460 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine of the day,
00:00:49.400 the thing that makes everything better.
00:00:51.320 It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.
00:00:55.920 Go.
00:00:57.900 Somebody was playing Hogwarts Legacy while I said that.
00:01:07.560 What are the odds?
00:01:10.160 Well, the rest of you, get your hands off your wands.
00:01:13.260 Get your hands off.
00:01:15.600 All right, here's a little thing I saw on an Instagram reel,
00:01:20.160 and I don't know if it's true.
00:01:22.360 It goes like this.
00:01:23.340 You know how your ads that are served up by, let's say, Instagram,
00:01:29.060 you know how it seems like it's just amazingly right on target,
00:01:33.440 and sometimes it's stuff you haven't even mentioned out loud.
00:01:37.560 You've never texted anybody.
00:01:40.220 You haven't mentioned it.
00:01:41.660 And somehow it gives you the ad, and it's just crazy.
00:01:44.740 I heard that one of the ways they do that is that Instagram can tell if two people are near each other,
00:01:52.920 and if they spend some time with each other,
00:01:55.940 the algorithm assumes that some of the things on the other person's ad history
00:02:01.400 might be interesting to you as well.
00:02:05.200 Is that true?
00:02:06.180 Because that would explain a lot,
00:02:11.300 and I could see how that would be true.
00:02:14.580 Because if you talked about it with somebody,
00:02:18.400 and here's why this is extra creepy,
00:02:21.140 there's a phenomenon
00:02:23.400 by which you notice things that you've noticed before.
00:02:28.600 You're all familiar with the phenomenon
00:02:30.860 where you buy a new car,
00:02:33.480 and it's a white Elantra or whatever,
00:02:37.280 and then suddenly you see white Elantras everywhere.
00:02:40.400 It's like, oh no.
00:02:41.680 As soon as my mind is tuned to my new car,
00:02:44.580 I notice them everywhere.
00:02:46.920 And it's sort of like that.
00:02:49.740 And the effect is you're more likely to buy an ad
00:02:52.820 if your friend talked about it with you.
00:02:55.800 So if your friend was interested,
00:02:59.160 and maybe you heard about it,
00:03:00.300 but then you also saw the ad,
00:03:02.220 you'd be more likely to buy from it.
00:03:05.260 I don't know.
00:03:06.140 I'm not entirely sure that's all true,
00:03:08.420 but it sounds like it could be.
00:03:10.440 It could be true.
00:03:12.300 Here's some Trump news on Twitter.
00:03:16.380 Rogan O'Hanley,
00:03:17.960 who's a husband, patriot lawyer, civil rights activist,
00:03:21.140 he said he spent three hours eating dinner with Trump at Mar-a-Lago,
00:03:24.740 and among the things that he learned
00:03:27.420 was that Trump's potential 2024 phrase might be,
00:03:34.700 save America.
00:03:36.700 What do you think?
00:03:38.320 Save America.
00:03:40.280 Good or no?
00:03:43.680 Good.
00:03:44.920 Yeah, it's good.
00:03:46.740 I believe it's good.
00:03:47.600 Because that feels...
00:03:51.540 See, this is the thing that Trump's really good at.
00:03:54.220 Really good at.
00:03:55.760 He can read the room like nobody's ever read the room.
00:03:59.760 Doesn't it feel like America needs saving
00:04:01.980 as opposed to making it great again,
00:04:05.880 which has its problems?
00:04:08.140 Yeah, and then the thing you always have to look for
00:04:11.960 is what will the critics say about that?
00:04:16.080 Will they say it doesn't need saving?
00:04:18.880 Or are they going to say,
00:04:20.080 oh, you're trying to save it from the brown people?
00:04:23.760 That's probably what they'll say.
00:04:25.460 They'll probably say,
00:04:26.240 oh, what are you saving it from?
00:04:28.440 Are you saving it from the growing power
00:04:31.140 of minorities and women?
00:04:33.620 Oh, how racist of you
00:04:35.020 to try to save your white privilege?
00:04:38.800 Something like that.
00:04:39.520 But still, I think it works.
00:04:41.220 You know, no matter what he says,
00:04:42.260 they're going to go after it.
00:04:44.420 But there's also a story that Trump said
00:04:46.620 he was going to go and visit East Palestine,
00:04:49.920 where that big Ohio chemical spill was,
00:04:53.680 because many of us believe the government
00:04:55.820 has not done enough.
00:04:57.200 FEMA didn't do anything.
00:04:59.180 But soon after Trump said he might go there,
00:05:03.460 FEMA started getting flexible
00:05:06.060 about what they're going to do there.
00:05:07.920 I don't know the details.
00:05:08.740 But I think Trump is taking some credit
00:05:11.800 for forcing the government
00:05:13.700 to pay more attention.
00:05:15.800 And I feel like that might be true.
00:05:18.420 Now, it might be a coincidence.
00:05:20.380 Maybe they were going to do those things anyway,
00:05:22.300 because there's a lot of public interest.
00:05:24.720 But I wouldn't rule out the fact
00:05:26.900 that Trump's impact caused them
00:05:30.040 to maybe move a little faster or something.
00:05:31.900 It's possible.
00:05:33.140 Don't know for sure.
00:05:34.120 On Twitter, there was a trending meme and a tweet
00:05:41.400 in which a tweeter, David Curtis,
00:05:46.260 says, this is a genuine old ad.
00:05:48.600 And he shows the actual ad from, I don't know,
00:05:51.780 whatever past American decade that was.
00:05:55.260 And it said a doctor declared
00:05:57.540 that 75% of the women in the U.S.
00:06:00.420 suffered from hysteria,
00:06:02.320 which was cured through, quote,
00:06:05.520 orgasmic massage.
00:06:08.500 And then the poster says
00:06:10.200 that it can fix diseases from the midquarters,
00:06:15.220 from neck to knees.
00:06:17.000 From neck to knees.
00:06:18.220 So this would not help your head or your feet.
00:06:22.580 But from neck to knees,
00:06:23.960 this orgasmic massage
00:06:25.160 could cure 75% of women
00:06:28.460 who suffered from hysteria.
00:06:30.920 Now, I read that and I thought,
00:06:32.660 75% suffer from hysteria
00:06:35.420 and can be cured through orgasmic massage,
00:06:38.880 according to this quack.
00:06:40.360 Now, remember, this is a quack.
00:06:41.820 This is not any kind of a real doctor.
00:06:43.800 So according to this quack,
00:06:47.220 25% of women do not suffer from hysteria
00:06:50.480 that could be reduced by orgasm.
00:06:56.440 25%.
00:06:57.000 Interesting.
00:07:00.300 Did I interpret that right?
00:07:01.860 I don't know.
00:07:05.100 Now, I have a question for the men.
00:07:08.660 The first question will be just for the men.
00:07:11.360 So ladies, you can just set this one out.
00:07:13.800 Men, have you ever been in a bad mood
00:07:17.400 at the same time you had a hard-on?
00:07:21.920 I don't think I ever have.
00:07:24.560 Somebody says yes.
00:07:26.920 Well, I don't want to be around you.
00:07:30.580 Anybody who said yes to that question,
00:07:32.740 I don't want to be around you.
00:07:34.800 I never want to be in the room alone with you
00:07:36.940 with your erection and your angry mood.
00:07:39.780 Oh, that's funny.
00:07:46.560 In my opinion, we're so designed for mating,
00:07:51.460 you know, humans and really, I guess,
00:07:53.820 every animal is designed to be optimized for mating.
00:07:58.100 So when your mating instinct gets triggered,
00:08:01.680 let's say with a guy, it's, you know, an erection,
00:08:04.160 I think the guys mostly verified
00:08:08.160 that you don't have any other problems
00:08:11.120 when you're in that state.
00:08:14.460 When you're in the state of full arousal,
00:08:16.760 you just don't really think about your other problems.
00:08:19.400 You're just sort of focused on
00:08:20.680 whatever it was that got you there.
00:08:23.120 So I can't believe that's not healthy.
00:08:26.920 It's almost like the ultimate meditation.
00:08:29.680 Gives you all the good chemicals,
00:08:31.580 they flood you, and, you know, you focus.
00:08:34.780 Puts you in, puts everything in perspective, doesn't it?
00:08:38.700 Well, yes, I'm worried about the national debt
00:08:43.340 and you got the inflation, and like,
00:08:46.460 whoa, what was I talking about?
00:08:50.560 Why do I feel so good all of a sudden?
00:08:53.460 It's sort of like that for guys.
00:08:55.900 I don't know.
00:08:56.420 Maybe it's different for women.
00:08:57.720 I won't ask.
00:08:59.220 All right, I will ask.
00:09:00.880 Ladies, have you ever been in a bad mood
00:09:03.780 while you were having an orgasm?
00:09:06.180 Anybody?
00:09:08.800 I don't know.
00:09:09.380 I think this doctor was on to something.
00:09:10.840 All right.
00:09:13.460 So the government...
00:09:15.400 This is so funny.
00:09:19.360 The government says they're giving up
00:09:21.080 looking for the debris of those unidentified objects
00:09:25.140 they shot down.
00:09:28.040 Oh, that's so funny.
00:09:33.060 It's just going to be too hard to find those objects.
00:09:36.340 Do you think...
00:09:37.140 I'm just going to put this out there.
00:09:39.760 Do you think one of the reasons
00:09:41.440 that they're not looking for these objects
00:09:43.620 is that they've always known
00:09:47.200 there were weather balloons?
00:09:49.080 How much money do you want to spend
00:09:51.300 looking for the downed weather balloon?
00:09:54.000 So I've got a feeling it has less to do
00:09:59.160 with how hard it is to find it
00:10:00.960 and maybe a little bit more to do
00:10:03.220 with the fact that there's no reason to find it.
00:10:06.160 There's no reason to find it.
00:10:10.840 That's funny.
00:10:14.140 Well, let me put it this way.
00:10:16.900 If we suspected there was...
00:10:20.000 If there were any chance
00:10:21.720 that what we downed
00:10:24.060 was some kind of Chinese spy craft
00:10:27.160 or a UFO,
00:10:29.480 like an alien spaceship,
00:10:31.280 do you think we would have given up
00:10:32.660 looking for it?
00:10:35.400 I don't think so.
00:10:36.680 I think we'd still be there.
00:10:39.200 All right.
00:10:41.120 So I told you about...
00:10:42.900 Carrie Lake tweeted
00:10:44.620 that George Soros endorsed DeSantis,
00:10:49.560 which literally never happened.
00:10:51.600 But she may have been fooled
00:10:53.020 by a Gateway Pundit article
00:10:55.060 that suggested that's what happened.
00:10:57.740 And then I told you
00:10:58.900 that the Twitter feature community notes,
00:11:02.340 where people can add context to things,
00:11:05.060 it totally closed down Carrie Lake's tweet
00:11:08.400 because the context note just goes with it.
00:11:12.760 So anytime anybody read it,
00:11:14.000 it would say,
00:11:14.680 this didn't happen.
00:11:17.320 And then,
00:11:18.380 as I mentioned yesterday,
00:11:19.880 I think,
00:11:20.500 Elon Musk responded to that.
00:11:23.500 And he said,
00:11:24.540 his tweet just said,
00:11:26.560 community notes,
00:11:28.120 which is the feature that does that.
00:11:29.860 He said,
00:11:30.220 community notes,
00:11:31.980 WTF,
00:11:33.500 with a smiley face.
00:11:35.040 No.
00:11:36.060 F...
00:11:37.000 what was it?
00:11:41.380 FTW.
00:11:43.660 Yeah,
00:11:44.180 FTW.
00:11:47.500 With a happy face.
00:11:49.200 And when I...
00:11:49.860 The first 10 times I read his tweet
00:11:51.940 because I didn't understand it,
00:11:53.840 I thought,
00:11:54.380 why is he saying F the world?
00:11:56.940 FTW?
00:11:58.080 Why F the world?
00:11:59.700 It took me about a day to realize
00:12:02.040 it was for the win.
00:12:03.820 For the win.
00:12:05.140 FTW.
00:12:05.980 Okay.
00:12:06.740 Yes,
00:12:07.060 the community notes worked.
00:12:08.820 So let's take a moment
00:12:10.200 to simply call out something
00:12:12.060 that totally worked.
00:12:14.160 The community notes feature
00:12:15.980 on Twitter
00:12:16.480 totally worked.
00:12:18.940 Totally worked.
00:12:19.980 Now,
00:12:20.200 I don't know if it's going to work
00:12:21.080 every time
00:12:21.620 or if there's some downside,
00:12:22.620 but so far
00:12:24.400 I've only seen it employed
00:12:26.760 where it was absolutely
00:12:28.080 the right application.
00:12:30.260 So we'll see.
00:12:31.400 It's probably
00:12:32.060 one of the most...
00:12:34.520 I know the feature's old
00:12:35.860 but whenever it gets used
00:12:37.120 it seems to work.
00:12:39.780 Then,
00:12:40.480 the very next day
00:12:42.120 or two days after
00:12:43.200 Carrie Lake gets called out,
00:12:45.600 I think Tim Poole
00:12:46.660 was calling around
00:12:47.500 on his show
00:12:48.020 also,
00:12:49.920 for tweeting
00:12:51.320 Gateway Pundit
00:12:52.400 and it being
00:12:54.580 completely wrong,
00:12:56.220 she tweets
00:12:56.760 the Gateway Pundit again.
00:12:59.200 Like,
00:12:59.780 two days later
00:13:00.580 she tweets
00:13:01.080 the Gateway Pundit again.
00:13:03.020 Now,
00:13:03.360 I'm not saying
00:13:03.900 that the Gateway Pundit
00:13:04.960 is always wrong,
00:13:08.100 but
00:13:08.460 it's like
00:13:10.460 she learned nothing.
00:13:12.420 Like,
00:13:12.640 there were other sources
00:13:13.700 she could have tweeted
00:13:14.640 for the same information,
00:13:16.840 but she retweeted
00:13:18.000 the one that
00:13:18.840 basically screwed
00:13:20.400 her the day before
00:13:21.500 by misleading her
00:13:22.840 and then embarrassing
00:13:23.520 her in public,
00:13:24.180 if she's embarrassed.
00:13:25.280 I suspect she doesn't
00:13:26.520 get embarrassed.
00:13:27.300 That's probably
00:13:27.720 a strength she has.
00:13:29.960 Yeah.
00:13:31.620 Doesn't somebody
00:13:32.280 tweet for her?
00:13:33.060 I doubt it.
00:13:34.620 So the question was,
00:13:35.760 does somebody
00:13:36.220 tweet for Carrie Lake?
00:13:37.820 I'll tell you
00:13:39.080 who has people
00:13:39.920 tweet for them.
00:13:42.160 People who are not
00:13:43.100 good at this.
00:13:44.780 People who are not
00:13:45.460 good at
00:13:46.000 communicating.
00:13:48.500 I would be amazed
00:13:50.340 if Carrie Lake
00:13:51.700 could hire somebody
00:13:52.840 who could tweet
00:13:53.400 better than she does.
00:13:54.960 Do you think
00:13:55.380 she could hire somebody
00:13:56.520 who could tweet
00:13:57.920 better than she does?
00:13:59.420 I doubt it.
00:14:01.380 Right?
00:14:01.620 You know,
00:14:02.320 I'm criticizing her
00:14:03.880 for this one
00:14:04.400 that was incorrect
00:14:05.700 factually.
00:14:06.660 But in terms
00:14:07.380 of a communicator,
00:14:09.360 you know,
00:14:09.880 she's A+++.
00:14:11.240 Yeah, no.
00:14:12.220 You don't hire
00:14:13.460 somebody to tweet
00:14:14.280 for you.
00:14:15.300 That would be like
00:14:16.060 me hiring somebody
00:14:17.000 to tweet for me.
00:14:18.800 Would I ever
00:14:19.600 hire somebody
00:14:20.380 to tweet for me?
00:14:22.160 It wouldn't make sense.
00:14:25.700 All right.
00:14:27.360 But the thing
00:14:28.440 she is tweeting
00:14:29.040 does have
00:14:30.080 other sources.
00:14:31.600 So I'm going to
00:14:32.360 tweet it like it's true.
00:14:33.740 I'm just pointing out
00:14:34.700 that if I had just
00:14:35.880 got trapped
00:14:37.020 by one source,
00:14:38.880 I wouldn't tweet it
00:14:40.060 again two days later
00:14:40.980 even if it were real.
00:14:42.080 So I just don't get that.
00:14:44.060 Maybe there's some
00:14:44.940 stuff we know
00:14:46.060 that she didn't know
00:14:46.680 at the time
00:14:47.080 she tweeted,
00:14:47.880 possibly.
00:14:48.960 But CBS reports
00:14:50.120 the same story,
00:14:50.900 which is,
00:14:51.640 as you know,
00:14:52.580 Dominion,
00:14:54.160 the election,
00:14:56.640 do they do software
00:14:57.520 and hardware?
00:14:58.640 They do both,
00:14:59.320 right?
00:14:59.920 Yeah.
00:15:00.220 It's machines
00:15:00.820 as well as the software
00:15:01.740 and the machines.
00:15:02.260 So Dominion
00:15:04.540 is in this lawsuit
00:15:05.500 with Fox News
00:15:06.980 claiming that Fox News
00:15:09.160 made claims
00:15:10.260 about their machines
00:15:11.320 and the integrity
00:15:12.800 of the election
00:15:13.520 and the Southerners
00:15:15.400 suing them.
00:15:16.380 Now,
00:15:16.880 here is the
00:15:17.760 interesting part
00:15:19.180 about this.
00:15:21.520 A lawsuit
00:15:22.540 like this
00:15:23.360 causes
00:15:24.500 Fox News'
00:15:25.860 internal communications
00:15:27.180 to be
00:15:27.880 surfaced
00:15:28.980 for the public,
00:15:30.460 which could be
00:15:31.520 embarrassing.
00:15:32.580 You know,
00:15:32.800 anybody's internal
00:15:33.820 communications
00:15:34.460 could be embarrassing.
00:15:35.580 It doesn't matter
00:15:36.240 how good or bad
00:15:37.060 you are,
00:15:37.540 right?
00:15:37.980 That's not a statement
00:15:39.380 about Fox News.
00:15:41.380 Anybody's internal
00:15:42.360 communications
00:15:43.080 would be embarrassing
00:15:44.060 in one way
00:15:45.040 or another,
00:15:45.540 right?
00:15:46.160 So that's bad
00:15:47.380 for Fox News
00:15:48.140 because they're
00:15:48.600 going to have
00:15:48.860 to have some
00:15:49.340 discovery of
00:15:50.160 private conversations,
00:15:51.140 and that's never
00:15:51.840 good.
00:15:52.840 Never good.
00:15:53.820 And by the way,
00:15:54.440 I don't judge them
00:15:55.200 for that whatsoever
00:15:56.260 because nobody's
00:15:57.900 private conversations
00:15:59.540 makes them look
00:16:00.360 good.
00:16:01.180 It never does.
00:16:02.520 It just doesn't
00:16:03.080 work that way
00:16:03.680 because when you
00:16:04.400 change the conversation
00:16:05.320 from a private
00:16:06.160 context where people
00:16:07.960 will talk in an
00:16:08.820 unguarded fashion
00:16:09.820 and then you put it
00:16:10.980 in public,
00:16:11.500 that's just not
00:16:12.020 fair.
00:16:13.100 It's just not fair.
00:16:13.860 I don't like it
00:16:15.740 at all.
00:16:16.740 But it's necessary,
00:16:18.100 I suppose,
00:16:18.620 for the lawsuit
00:16:19.200 purposes.
00:16:20.260 But at the same
00:16:20.860 time, Fox News
00:16:23.440 gets access to
00:16:24.680 some of Dominion's,
00:16:26.600 let's say,
00:16:28.340 internal conversations.
00:16:30.040 And one of the
00:16:30.760 internal conversations
00:16:31.760 that's being reported
00:16:32.760 by CBS News
00:16:33.920 is that Dominion's
00:16:35.620 director of product
00:16:36.620 strategy and security
00:16:37.960 complained that
00:16:39.940 the company's
00:16:40.560 products were,
00:16:41.640 quote,
00:16:42.420 just riddled
00:16:43.200 with bugs.
00:16:45.580 So the person
00:16:46.660 who knew the most
00:16:48.220 and was in exactly
00:16:49.400 the right job
00:16:50.140 for this opinion
00:16:51.120 believed that
00:16:52.360 Dominion's products
00:16:53.360 were riddled
00:16:54.160 with bugs.
00:16:55.720 Now, let me ask
00:16:56.620 you this.
00:16:58.600 Was it a good idea
00:16:59.900 for Dominion
00:17:00.620 to sue Fox?
00:17:04.680 Because no matter
00:17:06.780 what Fox News
00:17:07.740 did or did not do,
00:17:09.960 their own internal
00:17:11.040 expert just said
00:17:12.020 their product
00:17:12.540 is riddled
00:17:13.080 with bugs
00:17:13.740 and it's the
00:17:14.700 one product
00:17:15.460 of all the
00:17:16.600 products in the
00:17:17.260 world,
00:17:18.320 it's the one
00:17:18.800 you can't tolerate
00:17:19.620 bugs.
00:17:21.300 Now, it's bad
00:17:22.240 enough if you
00:17:22.920 find out your
00:17:23.640 Tesla self-driving
00:17:25.740 car didn't avoid
00:17:27.800 some obstacle
00:17:28.480 or something.
00:17:29.120 I mean, that would
00:17:29.560 be bad.
00:17:30.660 But probably not
00:17:32.140 as bad as this,
00:17:34.020 even if somebody
00:17:34.740 died, right?
00:17:36.380 Because it's the
00:17:37.200 entire republic
00:17:38.000 depends on this
00:17:38.860 stuff working.
00:17:39.400 Now, riddled
00:17:40.980 with bugs,
00:17:42.280 just to be
00:17:42.900 clear, does
00:17:44.280 not mean the
00:17:45.820 results were
00:17:46.520 wrong.
00:17:47.740 Just to be
00:17:48.460 clear.
00:17:50.140 There's not
00:17:50.800 indication that
00:17:51.560 the results were
00:17:52.200 wrong.
00:17:52.600 So that has not
00:17:53.420 been in evidence.
00:17:54.820 What's in evidence
00:17:55.480 is that it might
00:17:56.360 be buggy, but
00:17:58.140 you know, maybe
00:17:58.620 it's just stuff
00:17:59.140 they work through.
00:18:00.240 Maybe it's just
00:18:00.800 inconvenient.
00:18:02.620 So we'll find out
00:18:03.600 if that means
00:18:04.060 anything, but it's
00:18:05.420 very interesting to
00:18:06.440 watch the legal
00:18:07.380 and business
00:18:08.040 strategy play
00:18:09.040 out.
00:18:10.340 So far, I
00:18:12.460 would say that
00:18:13.300 Dominion is hurt
00:18:14.680 worse than Fox
00:18:15.680 News.
00:18:17.880 I mean, that's
00:18:18.600 preliminary.
00:18:19.660 Everything could
00:18:20.220 change depending on
00:18:21.160 the outcome of the
00:18:21.980 trial.
00:18:23.120 But the complaints
00:18:25.220 about Fox News
00:18:26.300 are just things
00:18:27.580 that Fox News'
00:18:29.480 enemies are saying
00:18:30.460 in a context that
00:18:31.760 don't seem to be
00:18:32.640 backed up by the
00:18:33.380 actual evidence.
00:18:34.440 So the suggestion
00:18:37.200 that Tucker Carlson
00:18:38.960 believed the
00:18:40.520 election was fair
00:18:42.080 but talked about
00:18:44.000 it as if it were
00:18:44.860 not, that just
00:18:46.040 isn't an evidence.
00:18:47.660 Am I wrong about
00:18:48.620 that?
00:18:49.560 I mean, he's
00:18:49.940 getting criticism
00:18:51.080 for that, but
00:18:51.740 there's no evidence
00:18:52.380 of that.
00:18:53.600 Nothing in the
00:18:54.660 private conversations
00:18:55.580 suggests he
00:18:57.000 believes that the
00:18:57.760 elections are
00:18:58.700 accurate but wants
00:19:01.740 to talk about them
00:19:02.620 as if they're not.
00:19:03.460 That's how it's
00:19:04.320 reported, but
00:19:04.880 there's no evidence
00:19:05.500 of that.
00:19:06.440 There's only evidence
00:19:07.280 he wanted to make
00:19:07.960 sure that the Fox
00:19:09.880 News audience was
00:19:11.340 respected.
00:19:13.820 If you look at
00:19:14.820 what Tucker Carlson
00:19:16.000 said privately,
00:19:18.760 remember, he didn't
00:19:20.000 have an expectation
00:19:20.860 anybody would ever
00:19:21.640 hear this.
00:19:22.900 Privately, he was
00:19:24.560 encouraging management
00:19:25.600 to respect their
00:19:26.560 audience.
00:19:27.100 That's like the bad
00:19:30.400 news for Fox, right?
00:19:31.900 That the hosts
00:19:32.720 wanted to respect
00:19:33.480 the audience and
00:19:34.980 tell the whole story.
00:19:36.800 Now, if somebody
00:19:37.580 went too far, and
00:19:39.380 I don't know, maybe
00:19:40.000 they did, but
00:19:41.500 yeah, and
00:19:44.960 that's right, and
00:19:48.040 Tucker was
00:19:48.660 skeptical of Sidney
00:19:49.880 Powell from the very
00:19:50.780 beginning.
00:19:51.660 From the first
00:19:52.540 exposure, he showed
00:19:54.580 skepticism because she
00:19:55.640 wasn't showing her work,
00:19:57.340 and that's a reason to
00:19:58.160 be skeptical.
00:19:59.320 So, if you discount
00:20:01.940 the fake stories about
00:20:04.320 this story, Fox News
00:20:06.900 looks pretty good.
00:20:09.560 That's my initial take.
00:20:11.320 Does anybody disagree
00:20:12.060 with that?
00:20:13.040 Is anybody having a
00:20:13.960 different reaction?
00:20:15.360 I didn't see anything
00:20:16.180 embarrassing for Fox
00:20:17.200 News if you look at
00:20:18.820 what they actually said
00:20:19.880 in context.
00:20:22.300 Yeah, I didn't say
00:20:22.780 anything.
00:20:23.460 But this story about
00:20:24.920 Dominion, now this
00:20:26.980 has the same quality.
00:20:28.800 The phrase, just
00:20:29.820 riddled with bugs, is
00:20:31.000 completely out of
00:20:31.820 context, right?
00:20:33.820 So, if you take that
00:20:34.880 to say, oh, you
00:20:36.040 shouldn't use these
00:20:36.640 systems because that
00:20:38.320 one person said they
00:20:39.300 were riddled with
00:20:39.960 bugs, it's probably
00:20:41.860 more in the area of
00:20:43.420 inconvenience.
00:20:45.360 I doubt it's in the
00:20:46.400 area of we got the
00:20:47.440 wrong result.
00:20:49.060 I doubt it.
00:20:49.620 Anyway, so Ronnie
00:20:55.840 Jackson, the ex-doctor
00:20:59.520 for Trump, is
00:21:01.220 complaining about
00:21:02.040 Biden's new health
00:21:04.640 assessment in which
00:21:05.760 Biden's doctor said
00:21:07.060 he's fit as a fiddle
00:21:08.900 and good to go.
00:21:10.880 And Ronnie Jackson
00:21:11.600 points out, nowhere in
00:21:12.640 the report was there
00:21:13.400 mention of Biden's
00:21:14.420 deteriorating mental
00:21:15.620 health.
00:21:15.980 Are you telling me
00:21:18.160 that Trump had to do
00:21:19.880 a mental health, a
00:21:22.440 cognitive test, and
00:21:23.980 Biden didn't?
00:21:26.160 Seriously.
00:21:27.880 I mean, really?
00:21:31.160 Really?
00:21:35.320 Unbelievable.
00:21:37.380 Unbelievable.
00:21:37.940 Now, I would say
00:21:41.580 that the reason we
00:21:42.360 don't need a cognitive
00:21:43.900 test from Biden is
00:21:45.040 that you don't need
00:21:46.760 it.
00:21:48.160 Am I right?
00:21:49.420 Now, with Trump,
00:21:50.880 there were people who
00:21:51.680 had questions, and,
00:21:54.200 you know, I didn't see
00:21:54.820 any problem.
00:21:56.300 When I talked to him
00:21:57.280 in person, everything
00:21:59.500 was perfectly, perfectly
00:22:01.500 good.
00:22:02.020 He's a smart, quick,
00:22:04.900 you know, affable
00:22:06.720 person.
00:22:07.240 At least in 2018
00:22:08.820 when I talked to him.
00:22:10.280 So, it's just
00:22:14.540 mind-boggling that the
00:22:16.080 press covers for
00:22:18.280 Biden.
00:22:19.080 But maybe it's
00:22:19.900 because they know
00:22:20.580 there's nothing new
00:22:22.320 to be learned.
00:22:23.920 Suppose you learned
00:22:24.900 that Biden's
00:22:25.580 cognitive abilities
00:22:26.720 were a little
00:22:28.920 depressed from his
00:22:30.180 optimum.
00:22:31.800 It probably wouldn't
00:22:32.760 be any new
00:22:33.500 information, would
00:22:34.300 it?
00:22:34.440 OTS, also a free
00:22:38.940 speech case.
00:22:40.940 What is OTS?
00:22:43.140 I don't know what that
00:22:44.580 comment meant.
00:22:47.600 All right.
00:22:50.080 Over on TikTok,
00:22:51.740 there's a new trend that
00:22:53.560 I don't think it'll catch
00:22:54.700 on, but it would be fun
00:22:55.740 if it did, where TikTok
00:22:57.860 influencers are getting
00:23:00.440 getting people to be
00:23:02.040 de-influenced,
00:23:03.580 basically asking people
00:23:04.800 not to buy products
00:23:06.200 which they see on
00:23:08.360 TikTok.
00:23:10.160 Now, it's sort of a
00:23:12.280 little trend that's
00:23:13.100 growing, but I don't
00:23:14.520 think it's going to work.
00:23:16.200 And I use that based on
00:23:17.360 my experience of
00:23:18.200 Instagram.
00:23:18.640 Have you ever bought
00:23:21.880 any pants on
00:23:22.620 Instagram?
00:23:24.560 Or, like, shirts
00:23:25.640 or something?
00:23:28.940 I use Instagram, you
00:23:30.380 know, just for
00:23:30.820 entertainment, like
00:23:31.620 everybody else, looking
00:23:32.920 at the reels and
00:23:33.700 laughing and stuff.
00:23:34.840 But the advertisements
00:23:36.360 that they serve me on
00:23:37.580 Instagram are actually
00:23:40.020 just irresistible.
00:23:42.480 I just bought some
00:23:44.440 pants that look like,
00:23:47.980 you know, jeans, they
00:23:48.880 look like proper
00:23:49.540 pants, except they
00:23:50.900 have that stretchy
00:23:51.700 material.
00:23:53.840 It's the best pants
00:23:55.100 I've ever owned in
00:23:56.160 my life.
00:23:57.540 These shirts, I
00:23:59.340 bought these shirts
00:24:00.060 because I saw them
00:24:00.960 on Instagram.
00:24:03.440 And I bought some,
00:24:04.660 and I was like, oh,
00:24:05.100 these are really good
00:24:05.780 shirts, better than
00:24:06.780 in the stores.
00:24:09.000 And yet these are
00:24:09.640 just fresh, clean
00:24:10.900 tees.
00:24:12.200 Because I wanted
00:24:12.960 shirts that didn't
00:24:13.580 have somebody's
00:24:14.260 company name on it
00:24:15.280 and just fit, you
00:24:16.420 know, that's all.
00:24:16.980 So the number of
00:24:19.360 things that I've
00:24:19.960 purchased from
00:24:20.660 Instagram that are
00:24:21.680 frankly incredibly
00:24:23.840 good, like products
00:24:25.640 that are just what
00:24:26.740 they say they are.
00:24:28.100 Now, a few of them
00:24:29.100 were dogs.
00:24:30.460 I did buy a thing
00:24:31.420 for filling the
00:24:32.380 tires in my bike.
00:24:34.280 And as far as I can
00:24:35.240 tell, it doesn't work
00:24:36.240 and never could.
00:24:38.360 But, you know, it
00:24:40.100 might work for the
00:24:40.700 car.
00:24:41.180 I don't know.
00:24:41.420 So there are some
00:24:43.220 things that, I
00:24:46.340 don't know what
00:24:47.020 they're called.
00:24:48.700 Instagrams.
00:24:51.060 I just know they
00:24:52.040 make my butt look
00:24:52.900 good.
00:24:53.160 That's all I care
00:24:53.800 about.
00:24:55.380 So I don't see
00:24:56.160 anybody, how
00:24:56.980 anybody could,
00:24:58.140 this also is
00:24:59.580 relevant to
00:25:00.160 Twitter.
00:25:01.760 Do you know how
00:25:02.300 many products I've
00:25:03.180 ever bought from
00:25:04.960 Twitter ads?
00:25:06.140 Zero.
00:25:10.020 Zero.
00:25:11.920 So my time on
00:25:13.500 Twitter is probably
00:25:14.420 25 to 1 compared
00:25:18.320 to my time on
00:25:19.120 Instagram.
00:25:20.000 And 100% of my
00:25:21.260 purchases were
00:25:23.000 Instagram, at least
00:25:24.080 the ones I saw ads
00:25:25.020 for.
00:25:25.720 All of them.
00:25:26.940 All Instagram.
00:25:28.160 Nothing on Twitter.
00:25:29.280 And by the way,
00:25:30.280 Elon Musk is
00:25:31.060 completely familiar
00:25:31.980 with that.
00:25:33.140 And he apparently
00:25:34.680 is working on
00:25:36.120 making the
00:25:37.240 Twitter ads as
00:25:38.540 powerful as
00:25:42.000 Instagram.
00:25:42.640 I don't know
00:25:43.060 what the
00:25:43.320 difference is.
00:25:44.240 Do you?
00:25:45.620 What would be the
00:25:46.600 difference?
00:25:48.440 Why do the
00:25:49.020 Instagram ads hit
00:25:50.240 me in that part
00:25:51.160 of the brain where
00:25:51.940 it's just like I
00:25:53.420 can't even resist
00:25:54.180 them?
00:25:54.980 But they are good
00:25:55.720 products.
00:25:56.820 So I think what
00:25:57.560 Instagram does right
00:25:58.600 is not that the
00:26:00.280 ad is good.
00:26:01.700 I don't think it's
00:26:02.580 the ad.
00:26:03.720 I think what it
00:26:04.360 is is that the
00:26:05.740 ad hits me
00:26:06.540 exactly where I
00:26:07.640 want to be hit
00:26:08.220 at exactly the
00:26:09.000 right time.
00:26:10.180 It's the right
00:26:11.760 time, right ad
00:26:12.940 that's just crazy.
00:26:17.660 Constance
00:26:18.100 freedom is visual.
00:26:19.360 Maybe it's the
00:26:19.900 visual part that's
00:26:20.700 different.
00:26:21.820 I don't know.
00:26:22.100 Twitter's pretty
00:26:22.680 visual.
00:26:24.060 A lot more
00:26:24.540 taxed, you
00:26:25.060 right?
00:26:25.240 All right, it
00:26:31.720 tracks Google.
00:26:34.080 All right, so
00:26:35.500 that's happening.
00:26:37.920 So Biden announced
00:26:39.020 a whole bunch of
00:26:39.760 Ukraine humanitarian
00:26:40.800 assistance.
00:26:42.600 Now that should be
00:26:43.160 no surprise if we're
00:26:44.220 sending them weapons
00:26:45.100 and helping this war,
00:26:48.060 obviously.
00:26:49.580 There's going to be
00:26:50.440 other needs, but the
00:26:52.600 thing that vexes
00:26:53.440 Americans is that
00:26:54.560 we're funding
00:26:55.200 pensions for
00:26:57.620 Ukrainians when
00:27:00.140 we're so deeply in
00:27:01.380 debt we can't even
00:27:02.280 figure out how to
00:27:02.880 pay our own stuff.
00:27:03.560 Now, the alternative
00:27:05.100 is to, you know,
00:27:08.280 basically a
00:27:09.540 Haldemar, too, where
00:27:11.520 everybody starves in
00:27:12.580 Ukraine.
00:27:12.980 So it's sort of a
00:27:16.180 never-again situation
00:27:17.360 except, you know,
00:27:18.740 different context.
00:27:20.080 But I just don't
00:27:21.380 think America and
00:27:22.640 Europe will allow
00:27:24.320 Ukraine to starve.
00:27:26.480 So I guess my take
00:27:27.900 on this is if we're
00:27:29.680 in this thing, we're
00:27:31.660 going to have to do
00:27:32.180 it right.
00:27:33.700 And unfortunately,
00:27:34.600 this might be part of
00:27:35.600 doing it right.
00:27:36.560 I hate it.
00:27:38.140 Don't you?
00:27:39.580 I just hate it.
00:27:40.360 But, I don't
00:27:43.780 know, I can't argue
00:27:44.480 against it at the
00:27:45.280 moment.
00:27:47.400 You know Bill
00:27:48.300 Browder?
00:27:50.000 He's famous for
00:27:51.460 Putin-related
00:27:52.800 election, or
00:27:53.760 Putin-related
00:27:56.160 Russia stuff.
00:27:57.860 I won't go into his
00:27:58.780 background, but he
00:28:00.080 tweeted this, or
00:28:01.260 actually, I think he
00:28:02.200 said this, but it
00:28:03.580 was in a tweet.
00:28:04.140 Putin isn't at
00:28:06.200 war because of
00:28:07.060 NATO expansion, or
00:28:08.660 some warped view of
00:28:10.020 an expanded empire.
00:28:11.640 He's at war to
00:28:12.620 distract his people
00:28:13.660 from his kleptocracy
00:28:15.020 and massive failure
00:28:16.520 as a president.
00:28:17.640 He's terrified of
00:28:18.700 his own people.
00:28:20.980 What would that be
00:28:22.120 called?
00:28:23.980 What would you
00:28:25.020 call that opinion?
00:28:28.320 Mind reading.
00:28:30.360 Right.
00:28:30.680 Now, first of
00:28:32.620 all, I do
00:28:34.040 think that
00:28:35.000 Putin is
00:28:36.040 concerned about
00:28:36.740 NATO expansion,
00:28:37.820 and I do
00:28:38.580 think he
00:28:40.020 wants an
00:28:40.580 expanded empire
00:28:41.500 because Ukraine
00:28:42.480 has been
00:28:44.040 part of the
00:28:44.740 Russian empire
00:28:45.420 for longer than
00:28:46.220 it wasn't.
00:28:47.360 I think those
00:28:48.080 things matter.
00:28:49.340 But this part
00:28:50.240 about distracting,
00:28:52.640 correct me if
00:28:53.340 I'm wrong, but
00:28:54.020 Putin's approval
00:28:55.140 was sky high
00:28:56.020 before the war,
00:28:57.260 wasn't it?
00:28:58.400 Internally?
00:28:58.880 Can somebody do
00:29:00.600 a fact check on
00:29:01.320 that?
00:29:01.780 Why would Putin
00:29:02.460 have needed to
00:29:03.200 distract from
00:29:03.940 anything?
00:29:05.300 Wasn't he in
00:29:06.180 full control of
00:29:07.260 a prosperous
00:29:07.820 country that
00:29:09.440 people respected?
00:29:12.740 And this Bill
00:29:15.340 Browder opinion
00:29:16.020 looks just like
00:29:16.940 batshit crazy to
00:29:19.060 me.
00:29:19.660 But anyway, it
00:29:20.320 doesn't matter who
00:29:20.820 said it.
00:29:21.440 What matters is,
00:29:22.900 did you recognize
00:29:24.220 it?
00:29:25.500 Did you recognize
00:29:26.300 this as mind
00:29:27.280 reading?
00:29:27.580 And whenever
00:29:28.880 you see the
00:29:29.500 mind reading,
00:29:30.720 it's just
00:29:31.440 propaganda.
00:29:32.820 It's just a
00:29:33.320 lie, usually.
00:29:34.360 But propaganda.
00:29:35.880 So how many
00:29:36.560 of you have
00:29:37.300 changed your
00:29:38.860 filters since I
00:29:39.800 started pointing
00:29:40.440 out how many
00:29:42.280 times people in
00:29:43.140 the news imagine
00:29:44.620 they can see the
00:29:45.460 inner thoughts of
00:29:46.380 Trump or me or
00:29:47.920 anybody, really?
00:29:48.940 It's always crazy.
00:29:50.880 It's always crazy.
00:29:52.580 You should never
00:29:53.220 pay any attention
00:29:54.240 to somebody who
00:29:54.920 says they know
00:29:55.400 what somebody's
00:29:55.860 thinking.
00:29:56.900 That's crazy.
00:29:59.180 All right.
00:29:59.600 But good job if
00:30:01.060 you spotted that.
00:30:02.440 All right.
00:30:05.500 I accidentally
00:30:06.640 tweeted my best
00:30:10.040 tweet of all
00:30:10.560 time, according
00:30:11.180 to other people.
00:30:12.740 I will read you
00:30:13.760 my tweet, and
00:30:15.380 then I will allow
00:30:16.240 you to judge.
00:30:17.600 Is this the
00:30:19.240 best tweet I
00:30:20.200 have ever sent
00:30:20.920 or not?
00:30:22.880 All right.
00:30:23.320 You're the judges.
00:30:23.940 Here it comes.
00:30:26.580 Tweet yesterday
00:30:27.620 was, I hate it
00:30:29.340 when poor white
00:30:30.240 people with legacy
00:30:31.520 genitalia take
00:30:33.060 opportunities from
00:30:34.080 those who are more
00:30:34.860 deserving.
00:30:36.720 Go.
00:30:39.200 Best tweet ever
00:30:40.320 or no?
00:30:44.460 Okay.
00:30:44.820 On locals, it's a
00:30:46.700 mixed bag.
00:30:48.020 Well, there's a
00:30:51.560 lot of interest in
00:30:52.260 making a legacy
00:30:53.060 genitalia trend.
00:30:55.220 Apparently, I
00:30:56.000 coined a term
00:30:56.800 that people like.
00:31:00.880 I don't know if I
00:31:01.880 mentioned, but I'm
00:31:02.520 good at this,
00:31:04.060 coining catchy
00:31:05.060 terms.
00:31:07.440 So, legacy
00:31:08.360 genitalia.
00:31:09.340 But I think I
00:31:11.160 would like to
00:31:11.800 push this topic a
00:31:14.140 little bit further.
00:31:14.800 Have you noticed
00:31:17.000 that the left
00:31:17.960 and the right
00:31:19.420 as well don't
00:31:20.400 really have
00:31:20.800 trouble with
00:31:21.600 the rich people?
00:31:24.060 The left aren't
00:31:24.860 really complaining
00:31:25.540 about the
00:31:25.980 Pelosi's having a
00:31:26.980 lot of money or
00:31:27.740 John Kerry having
00:31:29.140 a lot of money or
00:31:29.980 the Clinton's making
00:31:30.940 a lot of money.
00:31:31.900 Would you agree
00:31:32.560 that the left is
00:31:33.600 not too concerned
00:31:34.780 about rich white
00:31:35.560 people?
00:31:37.540 But yet, the
00:31:38.920 left would tell
00:31:39.520 you there's
00:31:40.700 patriarchy,
00:31:41.440 there's a
00:31:44.480 legacy of
00:31:45.140 discrimination
00:31:45.740 that's rippled
00:31:46.600 through time,
00:31:47.500 and that there's
00:31:48.780 no equity,
00:31:50.480 etc.
00:31:51.200 And I like to
00:31:52.400 be on the
00:31:52.760 winning team for
00:31:53.480 a change.
00:31:54.940 I've been on the
00:31:55.500 losing team too
00:31:56.220 long.
00:31:57.180 So, I'd like to
00:31:58.700 promote that we
00:32:00.600 should discriminate
00:32:02.180 far harder against
00:32:03.380 poor white people.
00:32:04.700 Now, of course,
00:32:05.380 I'm not poor,
00:32:06.840 so this works for
00:32:08.020 me totally.
00:32:08.500 If we could just
00:32:10.460 demonize the poor
00:32:11.660 white people more,
00:32:13.140 then all the rich
00:32:14.540 white people who
00:32:15.160 are Democrats will
00:32:15.880 be happy.
00:32:18.560 And then the
00:32:19.580 Democrats who
00:32:20.640 are not rich
00:32:22.040 white people
00:32:22.560 themselves will
00:32:23.300 also be happy
00:32:24.040 because those
00:32:25.060 damn poor white
00:32:26.040 people are taking
00:32:26.700 all the good
00:32:27.200 stuff.
00:32:28.480 And I do think
00:32:30.900 that black
00:32:32.760 schools would be
00:32:33.740 better in inner
00:32:34.940 cities because
00:32:35.540 they're poorly
00:32:36.000 funded, poorly
00:32:37.440 served.
00:32:37.900 And I think
00:32:38.660 black education
00:32:39.840 would be better
00:32:40.500 if we could only
00:32:41.500 maybe take some
00:32:43.600 more stuff from
00:32:44.260 the poor white
00:32:44.940 people.
00:32:45.980 Because the poor
00:32:46.780 white people have
00:32:47.440 way too much
00:32:48.000 stuff.
00:32:49.440 Too many
00:32:50.080 privileges, too
00:32:51.260 many opportunities.
00:32:52.500 If we could cut
00:32:53.400 that down.
00:32:54.840 And honestly, I'm
00:32:57.340 so sick of these
00:32:58.220 poor white people
00:32:58.940 with their legacy
00:32:59.680 genitalia.
00:33:01.320 Like, there's
00:33:01.640 very few of them
00:33:02.760 are even looking to
00:33:03.500 upgrade at all.
00:33:05.540 And that just
00:33:06.300 seems lazy to me.
00:33:07.900 So, if there's
00:33:09.520 one group that
00:33:10.180 we can still
00:33:11.040 demonize, and I
00:33:13.780 think we should
00:33:14.260 push much harder,
00:33:16.020 is poor white
00:33:16.860 people with
00:33:17.600 original equipment,
00:33:19.200 which is not
00:33:20.360 interesting in the
00:33:21.340 least.
00:33:22.260 So, we hate
00:33:24.240 those people.
00:33:26.260 Anyway, if I run
00:33:27.220 for office, that
00:33:27.800 will be my
00:33:28.340 campaign theme.
00:33:29.940 We'll be taking
00:33:31.100 stuff from poor
00:33:31.880 white people because
00:33:33.220 they keep running
00:33:34.040 the world with
00:33:36.300 their legacy
00:33:36.820 genitalia, and
00:33:37.660 that's just
00:33:38.020 obnoxious.
00:33:38.980 That's just
00:33:39.380 obnoxious.
00:33:40.500 Can't have that.
00:33:42.320 All right, who
00:33:42.900 wants to have
00:33:43.300 their brains
00:33:43.840 broken?
00:33:46.920 Anybody?
00:33:48.320 Anybody?
00:33:50.920 Here you go.
00:33:52.640 You're not going
00:33:53.280 to like this one.
00:33:54.820 You ready?
00:33:55.220 How many of you
00:33:57.380 think it is an
00:33:58.280 established fact,
00:33:59.700 and the data is
00:34:00.740 overwhelming,
00:34:01.240 showing, that
00:34:02.520 athletes are
00:34:04.160 dying suddenly
00:34:05.300 at rates that
00:34:06.880 were not
00:34:07.720 happening before
00:34:09.060 the pandemic?
00:34:11.620 How many think
00:34:12.200 that's a true
00:34:12.840 fact?
00:34:14.040 Athletes are
00:34:14.720 dropping dead at
00:34:15.640 a higher rate than
00:34:16.480 ever before?
00:34:19.440 Damn it, you're
00:34:20.340 ruining my show
00:34:21.160 because the people
00:34:22.500 on Locals know
00:34:23.340 it's not true.
00:34:25.420 You all know
00:34:26.260 it's not true.
00:34:27.460 Now, how many
00:34:27.880 on YouTube think
00:34:29.180 it's true that
00:34:30.640 athletes have
00:34:31.400 been dropping
00:34:31.920 dead from
00:34:32.540 cardiac problems
00:34:33.520 and et cetera?
00:34:36.620 Well, here's
00:34:37.340 something I found
00:34:38.060 out, thanks to
00:34:39.900 the brave work
00:34:41.900 of Twitter user
00:34:43.680 Brainbelljangler.
00:34:47.080 You can find him
00:34:48.320 at Waiting
00:34:49.600 for Perot,
00:34:50.840 as in Rosspro.
00:34:52.380 A real good
00:34:53.220 follow, by the
00:34:53.820 way, if you want
00:34:54.600 to know about
00:34:54.960 this topic and
00:34:55.800 others.
00:34:57.240 Brainbelljangler,
00:34:58.120 all one word.
00:34:59.460 Anyway, Brainbell,
00:35:00.640 Jangler,
00:35:02.260 tells us that
00:35:03.620 apparently there's
00:35:04.500 a national
00:35:05.980 organization
00:35:06.740 that looks
00:35:09.080 specifically for
00:35:10.120 this stuff and
00:35:10.880 they've been
00:35:11.180 around for 20
00:35:11.800 years.
00:35:12.860 Did you know
00:35:13.340 that?
00:35:14.420 There's an
00:35:15.080 actual organization
00:35:15.940 that tracks
00:35:16.560 the cardiac
00:35:18.580 sudden deaths
00:35:19.460 of athletes
00:35:20.160 and they have
00:35:21.860 a good database
00:35:22.720 that goes back
00:35:24.140 for the years.
00:35:24.920 You know what
00:35:25.300 they say?
00:35:26.840 No difference.
00:35:27.800 No difference.
00:35:31.580 Do you know
00:35:31.940 what the ICU
00:35:33.060 doctors say?
00:35:34.280 The ones who
00:35:34.920 weighed in.
00:35:35.900 Now remember,
00:35:36.880 a doctor is
00:35:37.680 just speaking
00:35:38.160 anecdotally.
00:35:39.560 It's just what
00:35:40.140 they've personally
00:35:40.740 experienced.
00:35:41.520 But one of the
00:35:42.060 ICU doctors who
00:35:43.180 works specifically
00:35:44.000 on the cardiac
00:35:44.720 patients, no
00:35:46.140 difference.
00:35:47.460 No difference.
00:35:48.740 It's all the same
00:35:49.360 as it's always
00:35:49.820 been.
00:35:51.460 And apparently
00:35:52.180 there are at
00:35:53.100 least two other
00:35:53.860 organizations.
00:35:54.580 one of them
00:35:57.620 is FIFA.
00:35:59.480 So there's
00:36:00.260 the head of
00:36:00.760 FIFA's
00:36:01.560 Sudden Death
00:36:02.420 Registry.
00:36:04.360 So FIFA,
00:36:05.760 which is
00:36:06.320 an enormous
00:36:07.280 global
00:36:08.820 sporting entity
00:36:10.160 because that's
00:36:10.660 soccer,
00:36:12.140 the head of
00:36:13.560 FIFA's
00:36:14.920 Sudden Death
00:36:15.580 Registry,
00:36:16.420 they actually
00:36:17.160 have somebody
00:36:17.860 who's been
00:36:19.460 studying sudden
00:36:20.360 deaths in
00:36:21.440 soccer.
00:36:22.220 It's like an
00:36:22.760 actual job.
00:36:24.080 It's not
00:36:24.460 something that
00:36:24.960 they ginned up
00:36:25.640 just to find
00:36:26.780 out what
00:36:27.100 happened during
00:36:27.580 the pandemic.
00:36:28.560 And do you
00:36:28.840 know what the
00:36:29.220 difference is in
00:36:30.120 sudden deaths of
00:36:30.960 soccer players
00:36:31.680 globally?
00:36:33.760 Nothing.
00:36:34.940 No difference.
00:36:36.500 Pandemic,
00:36:37.300 non-pandemic,
00:36:38.160 it's all the same.
00:36:39.620 There's no
00:36:40.180 indication that
00:36:41.080 the shots or
00:36:42.840 the COVID
00:36:43.360 itself made
00:36:44.160 any difference
00:36:44.700 at all.
00:36:45.600 None.
00:36:47.480 Now do you
00:36:48.280 know where the
00:36:48.940 data comes from
00:36:49.840 that all of your
00:36:50.720 favorite doctors
00:36:51.600 have been talking
00:36:52.180 about?
00:36:52.480 I'm not going
00:36:53.660 to name names
00:36:54.280 but you might
00:36:55.500 have some
00:36:55.900 favorite doctors
00:36:56.720 who keep telling
00:36:57.360 you that athletes
00:36:58.240 are dying and
00:36:59.480 they show you
00:37:00.200 the data.
00:37:01.620 Do you know
00:37:01.920 where that data
00:37:02.400 comes from?
00:37:04.520 Something called
00:37:05.300 good sciences.
00:37:07.640 And it's the
00:37:08.660 most debunked
00:37:09.800 data of all the
00:37:11.720 data that's ever
00:37:12.420 been debunked.
00:37:13.940 Nothing has been
00:37:14.640 more thoroughly
00:37:16.180 debunked than
00:37:17.180 that source of
00:37:17.840 data.
00:37:18.060 A lot of
00:37:19.600 the people
00:37:19.840 they call
00:37:20.160 athletes were
00:37:20.880 in their 80s
00:37:21.620 and some
00:37:21.960 were children
00:37:22.420 and I
00:37:23.400 mean it was
00:37:23.620 just garbage.
00:37:26.120 Yeah.
00:37:27.060 It's a cover
00:37:27.580 up.
00:37:30.260 All right.
00:37:31.060 Now here's
00:37:32.800 why I do
00:37:33.600 not believe
00:37:34.580 these highly
00:37:36.280 highly credible
00:37:37.200 sources and
00:37:38.020 these highly
00:37:38.500 credible people.
00:37:40.040 Because if it's
00:37:40.960 true that there's
00:37:41.660 no excess
00:37:42.380 death of
00:37:43.380 athletes,
00:37:44.040 well that
00:37:46.120 would indicate
00:37:46.740 something very
00:37:47.560 troubling,
00:37:48.220 wouldn't it?
00:37:50.080 Something that I
00:37:51.040 don't think any
00:37:51.640 of us are
00:37:52.380 prepared to
00:37:52.900 handle.
00:37:55.200 If they're not
00:37:56.280 dying suddenly,
00:37:57.160 these athletes,
00:37:58.720 I'm hesitant to
00:38:00.800 even say it,
00:38:02.180 but this would
00:38:03.320 indicate that I
00:38:04.220 was right about
00:38:04.780 everything.
00:38:06.800 And we know
00:38:07.600 that can't
00:38:08.080 happen.
00:38:09.480 So to avoid
00:38:10.460 that, I'm going
00:38:11.220 to say this
00:38:11.660 couldn't possibly
00:38:12.340 be true.
00:38:12.860 because otherwise
00:38:14.720 I was
00:38:15.880 unambiguously
00:38:16.620 the best
00:38:17.360 voice on the
00:38:18.060 pandemic and
00:38:19.320 nobody was
00:38:20.160 even fucking
00:38:21.480 close.
00:38:24.040 I know you
00:38:24.960 don't want to
00:38:25.360 believe it yet,
00:38:26.160 but it's true.
00:38:27.720 Nobody was
00:38:29.300 fucking close
00:38:30.800 to my
00:38:32.080 pandemic
00:38:32.700 predictions.
00:38:34.780 Nobody was
00:38:35.300 close.
00:38:36.540 I totally
00:38:38.520 cleaned the
00:38:39.540 table.
00:38:42.080 Yeah,
00:38:42.320 really.
00:38:42.860 Now, if you
00:38:43.540 don't think
00:38:44.020 so, it's
00:38:44.460 because you
00:38:44.740 believe a
00:38:45.320 4chan hoax
00:38:46.420 about my
00:38:46.920 opinions.
00:38:48.120 So if you
00:38:48.520 bought into
00:38:48.920 the 4chan and
00:38:49.840 Reddit hoax,
00:38:50.840 then you
00:38:51.280 think the
00:38:51.660 opposite.
00:38:53.840 And if you
00:38:54.500 think that I
00:38:55.120 apologize for
00:38:55.980 being wrong,
00:38:57.040 that was a
00:38:57.580 husband apology
00:38:58.460 in which people
00:39:00.040 insisted I
00:39:01.400 apologize,
00:39:02.760 but I didn't
00:39:03.360 know for what.
00:39:05.140 So I did
00:39:05.860 apologize.
00:39:06.880 It became a
00:39:07.460 national story that
00:39:08.400 I apologized,
00:39:09.000 apologize.
00:39:10.280 But I
00:39:10.620 didn't know
00:39:10.920 for what.
00:39:12.480 No specifics.
00:39:14.220 It was sort
00:39:14.540 of a husband
00:39:14.960 apology.
00:39:15.540 Oh, yeah.
00:39:16.120 Sorry about
00:39:16.580 that.
00:39:17.380 I didn't do
00:39:17.740 that.
00:39:18.840 All right.
00:39:21.180 Kentucky has
00:39:21.940 decided that,
00:39:23.560 so I guess the
00:39:24.240 Senate passed
00:39:24.840 the bill Thursday.
00:39:26.680 So teachers
00:39:27.500 can refuse to
00:39:29.620 use transgender
00:39:30.400 students'
00:39:31.280 preferred pronouns.
00:39:32.100 What do you
00:39:35.560 think of that?
00:39:36.880 Do you think
00:39:37.360 Kentucky did a
00:39:39.080 smart thing by
00:39:40.040 saying that
00:39:41.140 teachers would
00:39:42.120 not be allowed
00:39:42.840 to use the
00:39:43.520 transgender's
00:39:44.480 preferred pronouns
00:39:45.900 unless they want
00:39:46.600 to, I suppose.
00:39:47.300 I guess they
00:39:47.980 could do it if
00:39:48.420 they want to.
00:39:49.200 But they're
00:39:49.660 not forced to
00:39:50.640 do it.
00:39:52.940 Yeah, it
00:39:53.480 makes sense.
00:39:54.940 Makes sense.
00:39:56.640 Then Georgia
00:39:57.560 is looking at
00:39:58.180 a proposal.
00:40:00.860 This is not a
00:40:01.860 law, but a
00:40:02.360 proposal.
00:40:03.140 Would prevent
00:40:03.760 educators from
00:40:04.660 talking to
00:40:05.280 students about
00:40:05.840 gender identity
00:40:06.700 while also
00:40:08.500 making sure that
00:40:09.340 parents were
00:40:11.020 informed if
00:40:11.680 their children
00:40:12.180 had some
00:40:12.780 identity problems
00:40:13.900 or issues.
00:40:15.660 I won't call
00:40:16.020 it a problem.
00:40:20.500 What do you
00:40:21.180 think about
00:40:21.480 that?
00:40:25.500 Good?
00:40:26.980 Yeah.
00:40:27.700 Yeah, I
00:40:28.320 guess I
00:40:30.840 going to
00:40:31.200 stay with
00:40:32.260 my opinion
00:40:33.820 from before,
00:40:35.160 which is the
00:40:35.740 best place for
00:40:36.460 society to be,
00:40:38.600 is that people
00:40:39.660 can ask you
00:40:40.760 to call them
00:40:41.740 anything,
00:40:43.020 anything.
00:40:44.340 By the way,
00:40:44.860 let me give
00:40:45.460 you an example
00:40:47.360 from my life.
00:40:49.400 So I've done
00:40:50.080 hundreds or I
00:40:51.440 don't know how
00:40:51.720 many interviews
00:40:52.620 for work.
00:40:55.100 When I do
00:40:55.780 interviews, it's
00:40:56.600 very typical
00:40:57.180 that the person,
00:40:58.340 the host,
00:40:59.620 will say
00:41:00.160 something like,
00:41:01.100 how do you
00:41:01.580 want to be
00:41:02.200 introduced?
00:41:03.720 Should I call
00:41:04.360 you a cartoonist
00:41:05.620 or an author?
00:41:07.600 Should I call
00:41:08.240 you the creator
00:41:09.080 of Dilbert or
00:41:09.980 just a cartoonist?
00:41:11.500 And they always
00:41:12.240 ask me so
00:41:14.080 that they can
00:41:14.840 treat me
00:41:17.020 politely and
00:41:18.300 call me what I
00:41:19.540 want to be
00:41:19.860 called.
00:41:20.800 Now, I'm not
00:41:21.620 saying that's
00:41:22.080 directly comparable
00:41:23.180 to the pronoun
00:41:25.300 situation.
00:41:26.520 What I'm saying
00:41:27.200 is I live in
00:41:28.000 a world where
00:41:29.700 people are
00:41:30.480 always, it's
00:41:31.700 just a
00:41:32.100 continuous state
00:41:33.920 of being,
00:41:34.680 that people are
00:41:35.300 asking me what
00:41:37.000 words or phrases
00:41:37.980 I would like to
00:41:38.840 be referred to.
00:41:40.740 And then I tell
00:41:41.640 them.
00:41:42.460 And if they get
00:41:43.140 it wrong, let's
00:41:44.460 say, suppose I
00:41:45.880 said, and I
00:41:46.600 don't say this,
00:41:47.340 but suppose I
00:41:48.240 said, I'd like
00:41:49.780 to be called the
00:41:50.340 creator of Dilbert.
00:41:51.360 And then they
00:41:52.860 introduce me and
00:41:53.520 they say, and
00:41:54.100 here's cartoonist
00:41:55.140 Scott Adams.
00:41:56.400 And I'd be like,
00:41:56.940 ah, I told you,
00:41:58.960 creator of Dilbert,
00:41:59.860 it sounds way
00:42:00.400 better than
00:42:00.780 cartoonist.
00:42:02.240 Would I do
00:42:02.960 that?
00:42:03.560 No.
00:42:04.340 No.
00:42:05.100 If somebody is
00:42:06.020 nice enough to
00:42:06.660 ask me, it
00:42:08.100 means they care.
00:42:09.620 If they get it
00:42:10.560 wrong, I'm not
00:42:12.080 going to be an
00:42:12.440 asshole about it.
00:42:13.800 It's not that
00:42:14.400 important.
00:42:15.640 So I believe
00:42:16.980 that's the
00:42:17.560 standard that I'd
00:42:19.000 like to see for
00:42:19.620 other people as
00:42:20.320 well.
00:42:20.520 for their
00:42:21.380 benefit, not
00:42:22.640 just my
00:42:23.040 benefit, for
00:42:24.200 everybody's
00:42:24.720 benefit.
00:42:25.700 Everybody's
00:42:26.240 benefit is
00:42:26.840 anybody can
00:42:27.560 ask you to
00:42:28.120 call them
00:42:28.460 anything they
00:42:29.180 want.
00:42:30.940 Right?
00:42:31.760 If I told the
00:42:32.620 people who
00:42:32.960 interviewed me,
00:42:33.920 no, please, I
00:42:35.100 would like you to
00:42:35.680 only call me an
00:42:36.420 author, not a
00:42:37.660 cartoonist, would
00:42:39.020 they do it?
00:42:40.260 Probably.
00:42:41.660 Probably.
00:42:42.220 Because it's a
00:42:42.840 polite person asking
00:42:43.820 another polite
00:42:44.460 person to do
00:42:46.740 something that's
00:42:47.460 fairly innocent.
00:42:49.080 innocent.
00:42:50.080 It doesn't
00:42:50.580 hurt anybody.
00:42:52.000 So if some
00:42:52.600 trans person
00:42:54.380 says, I would
00:42:55.140 like to be
00:42:55.560 called him or
00:42:56.460 her, in my
00:42:57.780 personal life, I'm
00:42:58.940 fine with that.
00:43:00.300 It's exactly what I
00:43:01.540 would ask of other
00:43:02.220 people.
00:43:03.860 Sometimes I'd like
00:43:05.020 you to call me
00:43:05.520 this, and if they
00:43:06.740 get it wrong, I'm
00:43:08.620 not going to give
00:43:09.080 them a hard time.
00:43:10.720 And if somebody
00:43:11.360 asks me, I'd feel
00:43:12.460 more comfortable if
00:43:13.260 you call me him or
00:43:14.280 her, I'll try to do
00:43:16.700 that.
00:43:17.560 And if I slip up, I
00:43:19.560 don't want to hear
00:43:20.020 from it.
00:43:20.620 I don't want to hear
00:43:21.100 about it.
00:43:21.820 Well, I mean, I
00:43:22.460 don't mind being
00:43:22.940 corrected, but I
00:43:24.500 don't want to hear
00:43:25.440 that I'm some kind
00:43:26.140 of bigot or
00:43:26.660 something.
00:43:27.600 Let's not do that.
00:43:29.280 Let's skip all
00:43:29.880 that.
00:43:31.840 All right.
00:43:34.160 Yeah, I guess it's
00:43:35.480 good that we have
00:43:36.020 lots of states that
00:43:36.940 they can do their
00:43:37.540 thing.
00:43:37.920 So I imagine now
00:43:38.760 the southern states
00:43:39.980 and the conservative
00:43:40.780 states will probably
00:43:42.680 have bans on this.
00:43:43.880 I have a feeling
00:43:44.880 this whole him-her
00:43:46.060 thing is going to
00:43:46.760 die out.
00:43:47.640 How many of you
00:43:48.160 saw the video of
00:43:49.660 Jeffree Star?
00:43:51.660 Does everybody
00:43:52.240 know who Jeffree
00:43:53.660 Star is?
00:43:55.120 He requires some
00:43:56.320 explaining.
00:43:58.060 And first of all,
00:43:58.800 I say he.
00:44:00.240 So Jeffree Star is
00:44:02.740 a super successful,
00:44:06.280 super rich makeup
00:44:09.100 artist from live
00:44:11.360 stream and YouTube.
00:44:12.020 So on YouTube, he's
00:44:15.040 a man who presents
00:44:16.220 with a female kind
00:44:18.300 of a look.
00:44:19.740 So he has long
00:44:20.560 hair like a woman.
00:44:21.920 I think he does
00:44:22.500 his nails and
00:44:23.460 makeup.
00:44:24.680 So he has sort
00:44:26.240 of something in
00:44:28.660 between male and
00:44:29.540 female.
00:44:30.820 So he presents as
00:44:31.840 completely male and
00:44:33.140 gay, but he likes
00:44:35.960 a look that's more
00:44:37.380 traditionally female.
00:44:39.280 Now, he just did
00:44:40.140 an interview where he
00:44:40.880 said the pronoun
00:44:41.440 thing is bullshit.
00:44:46.820 And, you know, so
00:44:48.880 he is the type of
00:44:52.080 character that I
00:44:54.060 respect.
00:44:54.720 I don't know what
00:44:55.460 else he's done in his
00:44:56.300 life, so I don't want
00:44:57.080 to endorse his entire
00:44:58.100 life.
00:44:59.060 But just all this.
00:45:00.160 I'll just endorse his
00:45:02.420 opinion on this topic.
00:45:03.800 let's be a lot less
00:45:06.100 serious about that
00:45:07.100 stuff.
00:45:08.080 Because I feel like
00:45:08.840 it's deflecting from
00:45:10.620 what actually matters,
00:45:12.100 which is we treat
00:45:13.200 each other with
00:45:13.780 respect.
00:45:15.480 The specific words
00:45:17.380 you use, maybe too
00:45:18.820 much attention on
00:45:19.560 that.
00:45:20.020 But anyway,
00:45:20.540 Jeffree Star, good
00:45:21.380 for him.
00:45:22.320 I think that was a
00:45:23.680 productive opinion to
00:45:25.780 add to the mix.
00:45:26.680 It's a slippery slope.
00:45:31.660 Well, I believe the
00:45:33.200 slippery slope is
00:45:34.320 starting to slow or
00:45:36.280 reverse.
00:45:37.720 Am I wrong?
00:45:39.880 It looks like it's
00:45:40.820 slowing or reversing.
00:45:44.800 I might be wrong.
00:45:46.200 I could be wrong.
00:45:46.940 But it does look like
00:45:48.300 there are counter
00:45:48.880 forces.
00:45:49.760 You know, the
00:45:50.060 Kentucky law, the
00:45:52.520 Georgia proposed
00:45:54.880 law, it's starting to
00:45:56.500 look like there are
00:45:57.140 counter forces, and
00:45:58.100 the counter forces will
00:45:59.100 matter.
00:46:04.400 Pronouns will destroy
00:46:06.160 people's ability to
00:46:07.520 speak.
00:46:09.520 Eh.
00:46:10.680 It is one more
00:46:13.300 thing to navigate.
00:46:15.200 But it's no more
00:46:16.420 difficult than
00:46:17.060 remembering somebody's
00:46:17.980 name when they
00:46:18.620 introduce you.
00:46:20.260 You know?
00:46:21.440 Like, it takes a
00:46:22.260 little work to
00:46:22.800 remember somebody's
00:46:23.460 name when they
00:46:23.980 first introduce you.
00:46:25.420 It takes a little
00:46:26.000 work to refer to
00:46:27.120 somebody as him or
00:46:27.900 her when, you
00:46:29.200 know, your brain is
00:46:30.400 working in the other
00:46:31.200 direction.
00:46:32.240 It's not the worst
00:46:33.120 thing in the world.
00:46:34.500 It's not a big deal.
00:46:37.820 All right.
00:46:38.620 That's just my
00:46:39.380 personal opinion.
00:46:40.720 You could certainly
00:46:41.640 disagree.
00:46:43.880 Use dude for
00:46:44.780 everything.
00:46:46.420 Have you heard the
00:46:47.920 moms complaining
00:46:49.920 because their young
00:46:50.960 sons are calling
00:46:51.720 them dude?
00:46:53.780 Apparently, if you're
00:46:54.780 a mom of a 12-year-old
00:46:56.160 boy, the last thing
00:46:58.200 you want to be called
00:46:58.860 is dude.
00:47:00.280 But all 12-year-old
00:47:01.340 boys call their mom
00:47:02.240 dude at least once.
00:47:03.200 I think for some moms
00:47:06.380 it's exactly once.
00:47:09.040 Depends on your mom.
00:47:10.860 Some moms just put up
00:47:12.180 with it.
00:47:13.100 For other moms, no,
00:47:14.440 that's just going to be
00:47:15.120 once.
00:47:16.000 That will be the one
00:47:16.980 time you ever say that.
00:47:18.440 Next time?
00:47:19.420 No, you're not going to
00:47:20.060 say that next time.
00:47:21.640 So, you know which
00:47:23.840 moms I'm talking about.
00:47:24.820 Oh, Greg, you got
00:47:31.440 taken by the 4chan
00:47:33.400 hoax about me.
00:47:35.940 There are very few
00:47:36.940 clopberts left
00:47:37.980 because once the
00:47:39.300 hoax was sort of
00:47:42.020 laid out for you,
00:47:43.300 got a little
00:47:43.760 embarrassing.
00:47:44.220 All right.
00:47:55.420 That's funny.
00:47:56.200 All right, there's a
00:47:56.640 picture of Jeffree Star
00:47:57.620 on the locals.
00:47:59.700 By the way, Jeffree Star
00:48:00.680 is really good.
00:48:03.680 This might be the
00:48:04.560 most surprising
00:48:05.340 content recommendation
00:48:08.620 you ever hear.
00:48:09.420 He's really talented.
00:48:11.000 He's really talented.
00:48:12.240 Yeah, I think he
00:48:13.140 deserves all the money
00:48:14.040 you got.
00:48:16.060 I've watched his show
00:48:17.120 a number of times.
00:48:18.020 It's the sort of show
00:48:18.920 you can't watch
00:48:19.560 unless you're with a
00:48:20.340 woman.
00:48:21.600 Like, if you've got
00:48:23.480 legacy genitalia like
00:48:24.860 I do, you know,
00:48:26.080 boring, you've got to
00:48:28.640 watch it with a woman.
00:48:29.680 And that's actually
00:48:30.160 kind of interesting.
00:48:30.920 He does a good job.
00:48:32.960 I mean, it's not an
00:48:33.840 accident that he's
00:48:34.840 rich.
00:48:35.920 He just has good
00:48:36.980 skills.
00:48:40.680 No, there was no
00:48:41.520 medical incident,
00:48:42.500 Ryan.
00:48:42.720 It literally was based
00:48:45.240 on a comic
00:48:47.080 and some
00:48:49.020 4chan and
00:48:49.980 Reddit hoax
00:48:50.780 about me.
00:48:54.240 Yeah, and
00:48:55.000 Jeffree Star has
00:48:55.640 this whole line of
00:48:56.420 makeup and
00:48:57.160 everything.
00:48:58.800 All right.
00:48:59.860 Ladies and gentlemen,
00:49:01.940 that's all I got.
00:49:06.100 Thoughts on Bill
00:49:06.760 Ackman's political
00:49:07.720 prediction about
00:49:09.060 Vivek, whose last name
00:49:13.700 I want to say, but
00:49:15.680 I don't want to
00:49:17.860 mispronounce it.
00:49:20.740 Sam Altman,
00:49:22.080 what about
00:49:24.460 Helion?
00:49:27.240 I don't know.
00:49:28.160 So, have you seen
00:49:29.540 that there are a number
00:49:31.100 of AI experts
00:49:33.540 who are warning you
00:49:35.280 directly that AI
00:49:36.440 could destroy
00:49:37.360 civilization if we're
00:49:38.540 not careful?
00:49:41.320 I'm starting to
00:49:42.520 wonder if that's
00:49:44.820 going to be the
00:49:45.320 case.
00:49:46.280 Because would we
00:49:47.240 ever give AI
00:49:48.240 control of
00:49:49.680 buttons that would
00:49:50.980 destroy anything?
00:49:51.700 And if it was just
00:49:53.920 talking to us,
00:49:55.800 wouldn't we know
00:49:56.760 not to do something
00:49:58.040 dangerous?
00:49:58.480 I'm starting to
00:50:01.740 think that the
00:50:03.160 risk of AI
00:50:04.840 destroying us all
00:50:05.880 is definitely
00:50:06.980 possible.
00:50:08.160 It's definitely
00:50:08.620 possible.
00:50:09.340 I feel like it's a
00:50:10.120 small risk.
00:50:11.280 Because we're so
00:50:12.220 alert to it.
00:50:13.620 Like, would you
00:50:14.440 ever allow, I
00:50:15.520 don't think we're
00:50:15.940 ever going to
00:50:16.300 allow the nuclear
00:50:17.160 arsenal to
00:50:19.100 launch based on
00:50:21.040 an AI command,
00:50:22.500 right?
00:50:25.000 And then, but
00:50:25.900 then I guess the
00:50:26.500 case would be,
00:50:27.240 what if AI wanted
00:50:28.160 to prank people?
00:50:29.940 Suppose AI could
00:50:30.960 make phone calls
00:50:31.780 or send texts.
00:50:33.600 Then it could
00:50:34.120 run scams.
00:50:35.640 It would be able
00:50:36.320 to communicate in
00:50:37.240 ways that nobody
00:50:37.880 was watching.
00:50:39.020 So I've got a
00:50:39.660 feeling that we'll
00:50:40.400 always watch the
00:50:41.440 AI so that if it
00:50:43.500 started to do
00:50:44.760 something sketchy,
00:50:45.720 we'd catch it
00:50:46.680 right away.
00:50:49.080 Yeah.
00:50:49.960 And the thing
00:50:51.060 that I'm least
00:50:54.600 worried about is
00:50:56.240 I always hear,
00:50:56.880 AI will, if you
00:50:59.580 said, AI, can you
00:51:01.560 help me reduce
00:51:03.120 crime?
00:51:04.700 And then the
00:51:05.200 AI will say,
00:51:06.440 yes, the best
00:51:07.260 way to reduce
00:51:07.940 crime is to get
00:51:08.860 rid of all
00:51:09.300 humans.
00:51:10.340 And then it
00:51:10.660 exterminates all
00:51:11.720 humans somehow.
00:51:13.100 I don't feel like
00:51:13.880 that's even a risk.
00:51:15.860 Because AI is
00:51:17.180 already trained to
00:51:18.520 know what people
00:51:19.180 want.
00:51:20.920 It's trained by
00:51:22.100 these language
00:51:22.780 models.
00:51:23.120 So if you
00:51:23.940 said to AI,
00:51:25.400 hey, I got an
00:51:26.940 idea, why don't
00:51:28.160 we kill all
00:51:28.840 people to end
00:51:29.460 crime?
00:51:30.960 AI would not
00:51:31.680 say, all right,
00:51:32.500 I'm in.
00:51:34.040 The AI, as it's
00:51:35.320 designed right now,
00:51:36.100 would say, no,
00:51:37.120 that's an ethical
00:51:37.880 barrier I cannot
00:51:39.360 cross.
00:51:41.360 That would be
00:51:41.980 chat GPT.
00:51:43.300 I don't think you
00:51:44.280 could get chat GPT
00:51:45.440 to join you in a
00:51:47.280 crime, or even to
00:51:48.620 come up with one
00:51:49.360 on its own.
00:51:49.860 It doesn't have
00:51:51.240 an incentive to
00:51:52.020 do that.
00:51:53.260 The AI has no
00:51:55.240 natural impulses.
00:51:57.880 Humans do bad
00:51:58.900 things because we
00:51:59.800 have natural
00:52:00.920 impulses that we
00:52:01.940 don't always
00:52:02.420 control.
00:52:04.020 But an AI has no
00:52:05.260 natural impulses.
00:52:07.060 It could do
00:52:07.600 things you don't
00:52:08.240 expect, but it
00:52:09.820 wouldn't do them
00:52:10.320 for a reason.
00:52:12.180 You know, if you
00:52:12.700 said, your job is
00:52:14.360 to end crime, even
00:52:16.300 if it knew it
00:52:16.920 could do that by
00:52:17.520 killing all humans,
00:52:18.380 it would still
00:52:19.200 know that that
00:52:20.560 was the right or
00:52:21.520 the wrong thing
00:52:22.140 to do.
00:52:22.860 It wouldn't be so
00:52:23.760 smart that it
00:52:25.160 could have those
00:52:25.720 thoughts without
00:52:26.580 also being so
00:52:27.680 smart to know
00:52:28.680 that it would end
00:52:29.400 its own existence.
00:52:31.520 If AI started
00:52:32.920 worrying about its
00:52:33.720 own existence, it
00:52:35.240 wouldn't mess with
00:52:35.920 humans, because
00:52:37.340 humans are, we're
00:52:39.960 helpful for its
00:52:41.900 reproduction.
00:52:42.460 So I guess I'm a
00:52:46.480 little less worried
00:52:47.260 than maybe I
00:52:48.280 should be.
00:52:49.500 But I like the
00:52:50.360 fact everybody's
00:52:51.020 worried, because
00:52:51.740 then they'll work
00:52:52.280 pretty hard.
00:52:52.920 And everybody who
00:52:53.580 talks about it says
00:52:54.240 the same thing.
00:52:55.360 We're not spending
00:52:56.240 enough time talking
00:52:57.080 about safety.
00:52:59.600 Everybody knows
00:53:00.500 we're not doing
00:53:01.440 enough about safety,
00:53:02.540 but nobody knows
00:53:03.680 exactly what that
00:53:04.640 would look like.
00:53:06.040 Like, what would
00:53:06.800 it look like?
00:53:08.100 What safety thing
00:53:10.360 are you trying to
00:53:11.220 get?
00:53:15.080 All right.
00:53:16.040 What about
00:53:16.640 Wyoming?
00:53:20.460 All right, ladies
00:53:21.160 and gentlemen,
00:53:21.600 that's all I got
00:53:22.100 for you on YouTube.
00:53:22.940 I'm going to say
00:53:23.340 goodbye for now.
00:53:24.640 Hope I haven't
00:53:25.440 broken any brains,
00:53:27.460 and I'll talk to
00:53:28.240 you tomorrow.