Real Coffee with Scott Adams - February 24, 2023


Episode 2029 Scott Adams: I'm Trending On Twitter. Was It Something I Said?


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 6 minutes

Words per minute

139.58192

Word count

9,315

Sentence count

677

Harmful content

Misogyny

18

sentences flagged

Hate speech

55

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Coffee with Scott Adams, a hit of the day: A simultaneous sip of coffee, a story about a man accused of murdering his wife and son, and not his daughter, and fake news headlines that don't match the story.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of civilization.
00:00:08.260 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and there's never been a better time to be alive.
00:00:14.280 There are times to be dead, probably, probably good times to be dead, but this is the best
00:00:19.120 time to be alive, and that's what I'm dealing with, just that domain right now.
00:00:23.340 Dead people, they can watch their own entertainment.
00:00:25.680 This is not for them.
00:00:27.180 This is for the living.
00:00:28.120 And if you'd like to take this living experience up to levels that could only be reached by
00:00:35.320 a Chinese spy balloon, well, you're going to need something to make that happen.
00:00:41.080 What you're going to need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a stein,
00:00:45.880 a canteen joke or a flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:49.420 Fill it with your favorite liquid I like, coffee.
00:00:52.800 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that
00:00:58.620 makes everything better.
00:01:00.540 It's called a simultaneous sip.
00:01:04.220 Go.
00:01:04.700 Go.
00:01:09.000 Ah.
00:01:10.000 Has anybody noticed anything in the news about me lately?
00:01:20.200 Anybody notice anything like that?
00:01:23.100 I might have another sip to that.
00:01:24.960 Well, let's begin with, oh, no, my enemies are sending me lots of energy.
00:01:41.160 Oh, no.
00:01:43.020 What will I do with all of that attention?
00:01:46.060 It seems that the hate for me at the moment has reached new levels, new levels of hate.
00:02:02.540 I'm hated so much today, I'm trending.
00:02:06.180 I'm trending.
00:02:07.600 Let's drink to that.
00:02:09.180 Mmm, trending.
00:02:10.660 Trending.
00:02:10.860 Ah, that's good trending.
00:02:20.660 Well, let's talk about the news and we'll get to why I might be trending.
00:02:26.740 Yeah, I'm going to make you wait, because I know some of you bastards came in here just 0.99
00:02:30.660 to see me get in trouble.
00:02:32.280 I'm going to make you wait.
00:02:34.820 Oh, we'll talk about it.
00:02:36.680 We'll talk about it.
00:02:37.660 But for the people who are the regulars, I know you'll stick around.
00:02:43.100 But for those of you who are only coming in to hate on me, and maybe, like, get another
00:02:47.340 article to write, you bastards are going to have to wait. 0.95
00:02:51.160 You're going to have to wait through all the other excellent entertainment to get to that
00:02:55.100 part where you can attack me.
00:02:56.920 But it'll be good.
00:02:57.800 It's worth the wait.
00:02:58.780 It is.
00:02:59.160 Well, as I often like to tell you, if I were the author of this reality, which I believe
00:03:07.120 is a simulation, I would give people funny names just so they could figure out they were
00:03:13.260 in a simulation.
00:03:14.600 For example, if somebody worked as a baker, I would name them Baker.
00:03:19.860 If somebody worked as a dentist, I would name them Dr. Chu.
00:03:27.400 That's an actual dentist, by the way.
00:03:29.660 And I noticed that there's an accused murderer in the news.
00:03:33.960 And what is the accused murderer named?
00:03:39.100 Murdaugh.
00:03:39.660 M-U-R-D-A-U-G-H. 1.00
00:03:45.680 Which is weird, because he's accused of murdering his wife and son, and not his daughter.
00:03:53.560 It would have been a little bit more on the nose if he'd murdered a daughter, because then
00:03:58.460 he would be a mur-da-ter guy.
00:04:03.540 It was close.
00:04:04.320 It was close.
00:04:05.260 Very, very close.
00:04:06.940 Yeah, Bankman Freed.
00:04:09.660 Yeah, Bankman Freed.
00:04:12.020 Exactly.
00:04:13.360 If I had somebody who did something in the monetary domain that burned everybody, it
00:04:20.900 would be Bankman Freed.
00:04:23.820 Or Fraud.
00:04:24.620 Bankman Fraud.
00:04:25.320 That's pretty good, too.
00:04:27.440 All right.
00:04:28.120 I saw some fake news on Fox News, Fox News website.
00:04:34.420 This is in the category of headlines that don't match the story.
00:04:39.660 Now, this is not, of course, limited to Fox News.
00:04:42.920 Usually, I'm talking about a CNN.
00:04:45.680 But everybody gets in on this once in a while.
00:04:48.460 The headline that does not match the news.
00:04:50.720 And I always wonder, is the headline writer just the provocative one?
00:04:56.700 They sort of know what they're doing.
00:04:58.160 Or do they not have time to read the article before they post it and come up with it?
00:05:04.960 Because it looks like maybe they didn't read the article.
00:05:07.820 It's almost like what they expected it to be.
00:05:10.160 I don't know.
00:05:10.880 So I don't know what the internal processing is.
00:05:13.260 But let me give you the story.
00:05:14.600 So the headline says this.
00:05:16.600 Popular AI bot forced to admit Democrats' talking point doesn't add up.
00:05:22.260 Do you think the story supports that headline?
00:05:27.900 That it's about chat GPT?
00:05:30.600 So popular AI bot forced to admit Democrats' talking point. 0.77
00:05:34.680 Now, the topic is about climate change.
00:05:36.980 But do you think that when I read the article,
00:05:39.480 I'll find out that it admits that their talking points don't add up?
00:05:43.680 No, they totally add up, according to the story.
00:05:48.860 I don't know.
00:05:49.860 But the story goes that junk science founder, that's an organization.
00:05:54.780 I don't know.
00:05:55.460 I guess it's either an organization or it's just one guy.
00:05:59.320 I don't know what it is.
00:06:00.600 But junk science founder Steve Malloy,
00:06:03.980 so he published a lengthy exchange in which he was talking to the chat GPT
00:06:07.880 and asking it, is CO2 warming a hoax?
00:06:12.420 Now, the AI started out by saying, no, it's not a hoax.
00:06:18.140 It's a proven thing that CO2 raises the temperature.
00:06:22.860 So far, so good.
00:06:24.460 I would agree with that statement,
00:06:26.740 that from a laboratory scientific perspective,
00:06:31.160 pretty much all the scientists agree that warm,
00:06:35.200 what do they call it, the greenhouse effect is a thing.
00:06:39.440 Now, it's not the only thing.
00:06:40.800 So it doesn't mean that if the greenhouse effect is agreed upon,
00:06:46.380 that you can therefore predict good or bad that will happen in the future.
00:06:49.640 Too many other things happen.
00:06:51.580 But scientists generally agree that that's true.
00:06:54.280 So, so far, I think that's not a problem.
00:06:58.440 But then it goes on.
00:06:59.360 And Steve pushes it on the fact that the theory is that the more CO2,
00:07:05.800 this is my own summary of it.
00:07:08.660 These are not his words.
00:07:10.440 But the, since the theory is that the more CO2 you add,
00:07:14.900 the warmer it gets,
00:07:16.160 how does the AI explain that for the past five years,
00:07:20.020 it hasn't gotten warmer while a record amount of CO2 has been pumped into the atmosphere.
00:07:27.100 And the chat AI says,
00:07:34.800 well, you know, any five-year period,
00:07:36.440 again, this is my summary,
00:07:39.060 not their exact words,
00:07:41.720 but the AI explained that, you know,
00:07:43.980 a brief period does not describe climate.
00:07:48.400 And it wouldn't be that.
00:07:50.360 Apparently, it would be normal and allowed to have a five-year period
00:07:54.440 where things didn't quite go in lockstep in one direction.
00:07:59.000 So it could be zipping up and down,
00:08:00.780 but the average over time would be up,
00:08:03.160 would be the defense of that.
00:08:05.800 Now, then I guess Steve Molloy got it to,
00:08:09.180 you know, admit that more CO2 is going in the air
00:08:12.360 at the same time that the temperature is not going up.
00:08:16.100 So do you find that in conflict?
00:08:19.400 Do those things seem to conflict to you?
00:08:22.140 So it says that any five-year period doesn't mean anything.
00:08:26.260 And then when Steve says,
00:08:28.100 this five-year period is opposed to the theory,
00:08:32.060 that's covered under the fact that
00:08:34.420 the theory allows that any five-year period doesn't mean anything.
00:08:39.200 And the AI explained that.
00:08:41.700 And then Fox News said that the AI
00:08:44.320 was forced to admit Democrats' talking point doesn't add up.
00:08:49.800 No, that never happened.
00:08:51.100 That's not in the story at all.
00:08:53.200 All right.
00:08:55.220 You have to see,
00:08:56.640 this is one of those stories that,
00:08:58.280 without the audio or the video,
00:09:00.520 you just have to go see Kamala Harris
00:09:02.460 talking to some small group
00:09:05.100 about her love of Venn diagrams.
00:09:07.860 Now, there seems to be a pattern developing
00:09:12.840 that if there's a really, really big topic,
00:09:17.860 such as, let's say,
00:09:19.740 having no border security,
00:09:21.380 she's, you know, interested in doing the job 0.73
00:09:27.120 and talks about it,
00:09:29.140 seems to take her seriously.
00:09:31.660 But it's not what she loves.
00:09:34.340 You can tell from her reaction
00:09:35.760 that what she loves
00:09:36.980 is charging ports on school buses.
00:09:43.000 She loves that.
00:09:45.480 I mean, that makes her giddy.
00:09:47.240 But also Venn diagrams,
00:09:48.860 as she was describing,
00:09:49.800 while giggling and showing so much excitement
00:09:52.980 about overlapping circles
00:09:54.980 that I thought she was going to have an orgasm.
00:09:59.320 I don't know, maybe that's just me.
00:10:01.920 But she was really, really happy about it.
00:10:04.580 But if you watch the video,
00:10:06.220 there's something I want you to watch for in particular.
00:10:09.200 Watch for her host
00:10:10.500 that's sitting in the chair up on the stage next to her.
00:10:13.820 And as she goes into her Venn diagram craziness,
00:10:17.000 the host just sort of is looking at her
00:10:18.740 and just sort of scratches her nose.
00:10:22.120 And I don't know if I'm reading her body language right,
00:10:27.520 but the body language I felt was,
00:10:30.200 oh, God, this is embarrassing.
00:10:32.280 Like, it feels like that's why you scratch your nose.
00:10:35.920 You know, unless her nose itched, I suppose.
00:10:37.960 That's a possibility.
00:10:39.120 But if you're looking at somebody talking
00:10:40.800 and, like, you're really into them,
00:10:43.040 and you're really agreeing,
00:10:43.880 you're like, yeah, oh, yeah.
00:10:50.360 You'd sort of look like that.
00:10:52.280 And here's how you'd look at somebody
00:10:53.720 if you wish they would stop talking
00:10:55.340 because they're embarrassing you.
00:10:56.520 Yeah.
00:11:04.420 Look for it.
00:11:05.620 It's fun.
00:11:07.260 All right.
00:11:09.460 Erasmussen did a poll.
00:11:12.300 Has that ever gotten me in trouble before?
00:11:14.540 A Erasmussen poll?
00:11:17.960 Hmm.
00:11:19.000 But they did a poll on Ukraine
00:11:20.600 asking people, Americans,
00:11:23.400 American voters, likely voters,
00:11:25.480 who they think is winning in Ukraine.
00:11:28.460 46% say they see the war as a stalemate.
00:11:35.340 19% believe Russia is winning.
00:11:38.500 21% think Ukraine is winning.
00:11:40.440 Basically a tie.
00:11:43.000 But these numbers have changed.
00:11:47.440 Oh, actually, more people thought
00:11:49.380 Ukraine was winning in December.
00:11:51.660 So it's actually way down from December.
00:11:54.080 Interesting.
00:11:54.860 But it's also the winter.
00:11:55.920 So it's sort of a winter stalemate.
00:11:57.460 So I'm not sure that that's not telling you
00:12:00.540 what you think it is.
00:12:01.380 I think it's just telling you
00:12:02.260 it's winter at the moment.
00:12:05.340 But does that track with what you thought?
00:12:10.100 It's roughly a tie.
00:12:13.180 How many people think Russia is winning
00:12:14.940 versus Ukraine? 0.83
00:12:16.340 I think most people just think
00:12:18.480 it must be a stalemate.
00:12:21.260 Yeah.
00:12:22.620 I don't know.
00:12:23.140 It tells you something about the state of news,
00:12:25.440 doesn't it?
00:12:25.880 That you can't even tell who's winning a war?
00:12:30.220 No, it could be because nobody knows
00:12:33.240 and it's completely mysterious.
00:12:35.980 But it's a weird thing that something as big as a war,
00:12:39.500 we couldn't agree if we know who's winning.
00:12:43.680 Because remember, if you add up the people
00:12:45.460 who think Russia's winning 0.70
00:12:46.380 and the people who think Ukraine is winning,
00:12:49.380 that's a lot of people
00:12:50.300 who don't have the same opinion
00:12:52.360 on whether the war is going one way or the other.
00:12:55.940 I mean, that's the most basic question,
00:12:57.500 who's winning the war.
00:12:59.060 It's strange that we can't figure that out.
00:13:01.460 I realize there are a lot of variables
00:13:02.900 and war is unpredictable by its nature.
00:13:05.740 But I feel like by now,
00:13:07.940 we'd have a bead on it.
00:13:09.580 It's kind of weird.
00:13:11.260 But, yeah, war is unpredictable.
00:13:13.960 I saw two more videos today
00:13:19.540 that I think are so racist.
00:13:23.660 And we keep seeing these anecdotal videos
00:13:26.800 that are not representative of the whole
00:13:28.760 and are highly, let's say,
00:13:33.200 brainwashing kind of material.
00:13:36.000 Because every time you see a video of,
00:13:39.120 well, in this case,
00:13:40.220 it's a video of black women, I think,
00:13:44.060 beating up a female Asian-American on a bus.
00:13:48.720 Now, and then I saw earlier
00:13:50.680 a black student beating up
00:13:52.740 a white teacher in a school.
00:13:54.740 There was just two of them I saw today.
00:13:56.920 Now, both of them have that same flavor to them.
00:13:59.820 And it's super racist.
00:14:02.960 I think you'd agree with this.
00:14:04.700 Super racist.
00:14:06.000 That the algorithm is serving me up
00:14:08.460 only black people beating up 0.95
00:14:10.620 Asian-Americans and white Americans.
00:14:13.520 Super racist.
00:14:14.820 Because it's not based on any kind of science.
00:14:17.400 It's not based on any kind of statistics.
00:14:20.880 It's based on either the algorithm
00:14:23.980 or maybe some human who's decided
00:14:26.260 that you should get an unending diet
00:14:29.020 of black Americans beating up other people 1.00
00:14:31.480 to make you feel more racist.
00:14:33.360 Now, since obviously the number of people
00:14:37.460 getting beaten up is the same 0.54
00:14:40.500 across all domains,
00:14:43.760 there are two ways to handle this.
00:14:45.060 One way would be to ban these kinds of videos,
00:14:47.480 which I'd be in favor of.
00:14:49.260 Just ban them. 0.99
00:14:50.980 Ban them totally.
00:14:52.280 But that would be, you know,
00:14:53.320 sort of a First Amendment,
00:14:55.100 you know, kind of thing.
00:14:56.500 You could make an argument
00:14:57.460 based on safety and health and stuff.
00:15:00.880 But, you know,
00:15:02.320 probably we wouldn't like that, right?
00:15:04.960 Would you agree?
00:15:06.320 That banning them
00:15:07.420 would be just another problem.
00:15:10.180 You know, that'd be a First Amendment problem, right?
00:15:12.780 Yeah.
00:15:13.200 So we don't like banning stuff
00:15:14.920 unless it, like,
00:15:16.300 actually causes you to go cause a crime or something.
00:15:19.840 Unless it's literally dangerous.
00:15:21.120 So the other solution,
00:15:23.520 and this is the one I would recommend,
00:15:25.420 is we need to start releasing the videos,
00:15:27.560 and they must exist,
00:15:29.060 of Asian Americans beating up black people.
00:15:32.620 Now, if you only saw that,
00:15:35.000 that would also be wrong.
00:15:36.720 Super racist.
00:15:38.280 Because you'd be like,
00:15:39.260 oh, Asian Americans, 0.99
00:15:40.460 why are you always beating up black people?
00:15:41.960 If that's all you saw.
00:15:42.860 If all day long you're saying,
00:15:45.720 Asian Americans beating up black men all day long, 1.00
00:15:50.180 you'd be like,
00:15:51.360 damn, I don't even want to live
00:15:52.860 near these racist Asian Americans 0.98
00:15:56.160 if they're beating up black people all day long.
00:15:59.180 And that's what you would think.
00:16:00.780 That's what you would think.
00:16:01.760 If all you ever saw was these videos,
00:16:04.080 then you would be sort of brainwashed
00:16:06.680 into thinking that a lot of it's happening,
00:16:08.880 when in fact it's just, you know,
00:16:10.760 selective stuff.
00:16:13.800 So, since I don't think we want to ban any speech,
00:16:16.960 so we don't want to ban the ones we're seeing,
00:16:18.880 we need to balance this out.
00:16:20.660 So I need to see,
00:16:22.220 for the benefit of everyone,
00:16:24.540 and I think you'd agree,
00:16:25.460 everybody would be better off
00:16:26.560 if the algorithm would release
00:16:29.700 the videos of the Asian Americans
00:16:31.980 beating up black people. 0.99
00:16:33.640 So at least there's some balance.
00:16:35.560 Now, I'm not saying I want to see anybody get beaten up.
00:16:38.780 Let me clarify.
00:16:40.860 I'm opposed to violence.
00:16:43.180 Completely.
00:16:44.220 I don't want to see anybody getting beaten up.
00:16:46.960 But if it's free speech,
00:16:49.920 and we're going to see,
00:16:51.260 right, Dr. Funk Juice,
00:16:53.200 you agree.
00:16:54.740 Thank you for the support.
00:16:56.100 By the way,
00:16:56.620 thank you for the support all the time.
00:16:59.540 I always appreciate you,
00:17:00.800 but I don't want to say it enough.
00:17:01.580 So that would be my solution.
00:17:06.800 More videos of Asian Americans
00:17:08.800 beating up black people 1.00
00:17:10.780 so that we have some balance,
00:17:12.140 and then we don't feel like we're being brainwashed
00:17:15.020 by the algorithm.
00:17:17.600 All right.
00:17:18.180 Did anybody notice
00:17:19.820 that there was a video
00:17:21.600 that featured me
00:17:23.360 going around the Internet
00:17:25.200 yesterday and today?
00:17:27.560 Did anybody see that?
00:17:28.460 I guess the Daily Beast picked it up
00:17:30.900 and something cause picked it up
00:17:34.160 and a bunch of people.
00:17:36.280 Now, some of it
00:17:37.060 might have been out of context.
00:17:39.860 And so, some of you
00:17:42.500 might be saying to yourself,
00:17:44.460 Scott,
00:17:45.560 did you say something racist?
00:17:48.660 And I'll just...
00:17:50.980 Oh, the answer is yes.
00:17:52.760 Yes.
00:17:53.840 So let me start out with the answer.
00:17:55.500 The question is,
00:17:56.300 Scott, did you say something
00:17:57.540 super racist the other day?
00:17:59.860 Yes.
00:18:01.200 Yes.
00:18:03.120 Everybody agree?
00:18:06.600 Well, let me tell you what I said.
00:18:07.940 I don't know how you could interpret it
00:18:09.500 any other way.
00:18:11.040 All right?
00:18:11.600 So what I said was
00:18:12.780 that based on a Rasmussen poll
00:18:15.760 in which people,
00:18:19.060 black Americans were asked
00:18:20.860 the question,
00:18:22.000 is it okay to be white?
00:18:24.020 And I noted that between the...
00:18:25.860 If you added up the people
00:18:26.840 who said, you know,
00:18:28.220 no opinion,
00:18:29.200 that they were unwilling to say
00:18:32.500 it's okay to be white,
00:18:33.840 and the people who said
00:18:34.800 it wasn't okay to be white,
00:18:36.540 it was nearly half.
00:18:39.640 And so what I said was,
00:18:41.700 if there's any group
00:18:42.860 in which the data,
00:18:45.760 not your opinion,
00:18:47.240 not your personal opinion,
00:18:48.360 but the data
00:18:49.700 shows that half of them
00:18:51.600 have a bad opinion about you,
00:18:53.880 that you should avoid
00:18:54.840 that group completely.
00:18:58.140 And people said,
00:18:59.500 but Scott,
00:19:00.380 that is so racist.
00:19:01.700 Well, of course it is.
00:19:04.580 That's exactly what it is.
00:19:06.360 That's exactly the definition
00:19:07.740 of racist.
00:19:10.000 Now,
00:19:11.160 is that a problem?
00:19:15.640 What's the problem with that?
00:19:19.880 Is reparations racist?
00:19:23.060 What about reparations?
00:19:25.500 Are reparations racist?
00:19:27.920 Yes.
00:19:28.980 Yes, reparations are racist
00:19:30.640 by definition.
00:19:32.360 Are reparations bad?
00:19:35.900 Well, it depends who you ask, right?
00:19:38.060 It's an opinion.
00:19:39.240 But simply the fact
00:19:40.180 that it's completely racist
00:19:41.880 doesn't automatically
00:19:43.940 make it bad.
00:19:46.820 How about,
00:19:47.460 how about,
00:19:50.420 what do you call it,
00:19:54.240 what's,
00:19:55.140 why am I,
00:19:55.560 affirmative action.
00:19:57.200 How about affirmative action?
00:19:59.020 Is that racist?
00:19:59.720 Affirmative action.
00:20:02.900 Yeah.
00:20:03.880 It's racist by definition.
00:20:05.820 It's racist by intention.
00:20:07.840 It's overtly racist,
00:20:09.940 and it's supposed to be.
00:20:12.160 In fact,
00:20:12.640 it wouldn't work
00:20:13.360 if it were not racist.
00:20:15.460 Would it?
00:20:16.180 Now,
00:20:18.020 I've tentatively been in favor of,
00:20:20.480 I'm forgetting the word,
00:20:24.440 but I've been tentatively in favor
00:20:25.900 of affirmative action
00:20:27.580 historically.
00:20:28.520 So I've been in favor of it,
00:20:31.280 which is pretty racist.
00:20:33.020 Wouldn't you agree?
00:20:34.480 Wouldn't you agree that
00:20:35.640 for all the years
00:20:36.580 that I was in favor of
00:20:37.960 affirmative action,
00:20:39.460 because I think probably
00:20:40.500 there was a point in history
00:20:41.880 where you needed a sledgehammer
00:20:43.780 to get things,
00:20:44.680 you know,
00:20:45.020 roughly equal.
00:20:45.760 And it was very bad
00:20:47.880 for people like me,
00:20:48.780 because I lost two careers
00:20:50.820 because I wasn't black
00:20:52.660 and I wasn't a female.
00:20:53.960 My bosses told me that directly.
00:20:56.480 If you don't know those stories,
00:20:57.700 you're going to doubt
00:20:58.240 that they're true.
00:20:59.480 Trust me.
00:21:00.280 They're true.
00:21:01.540 Yeah.
00:21:01.860 I was told twice
00:21:02.900 that I couldn't be promoted
00:21:04.500 during my corporate years
00:21:05.780 because I was white
00:21:07.140 and male.
00:21:09.380 They told me that directly.
00:21:11.360 Not hinted at it,
00:21:13.200 directly,
00:21:13.660 in direct words.
00:21:17.020 Now,
00:21:18.100 during those times,
00:21:19.840 I was also in favor
00:21:21.100 of affirmative action
00:21:22.180 because it was also clear
00:21:24.800 that, you know,
00:21:26.420 something needed to be done
00:21:28.140 and I didn't have
00:21:29.140 a better idea.
00:21:30.340 So I thought,
00:21:31.060 well,
00:21:31.980 you know,
00:21:32.280 I lost two careers
00:21:33.200 but I still had
00:21:33.960 so many options
00:21:34.780 that I went off
00:21:36.200 and got rich
00:21:36.920 a different way.
00:21:38.740 So I didn't feel
00:21:39.600 like much of a victim,
00:21:41.560 even though I was targeted.
00:21:43.660 I don't really have
00:21:44.640 a victim mindset.
00:21:46.840 So I had plenty
00:21:47.700 of opportunities
00:21:48.320 so I just said,
00:21:49.080 well,
00:21:49.740 this sucks.
00:21:51.360 I'll go somewhere
00:21:52.160 where things don't suck
00:21:53.300 so much.
00:21:54.160 So I went where
00:21:55.360 you could,
00:21:56.400 you know,
00:21:56.740 succeed just with talent.
00:21:58.380 I didn't need to,
00:21:59.460 you know,
00:21:59.660 I didn't need to be
00:22:00.200 a certain color or gender.
00:22:01.200 But when I was in favor
00:22:04.500 of affirmative action,
00:22:05.700 which by the way,
00:22:06.580 I'm currently not
00:22:07.580 in favor of.
00:22:09.000 I'm currently not
00:22:09.940 in favor of
00:22:10.540 affirmative action
00:22:11.280 but only because
00:22:12.540 the gap has closed
00:22:14.100 enough,
00:22:15.060 not completely,
00:22:17.100 you know,
00:22:17.300 it's not like
00:22:18.560 we have equality,
00:22:20.040 but we've closed
00:22:21.040 the gap enough
00:22:21.720 that the best thing
00:22:23.120 you could do
00:22:23.580 for the black community
00:22:24.760 would be to get rid
00:22:26.400 of favoritism
00:22:27.100 because you want
00:22:28.880 to do that
00:22:29.320 short of actually
00:22:30.720 full equality.
00:22:32.560 Like you want
00:22:33.060 to end the favoritism
00:22:34.320 just before you get,
00:22:36.300 or not even just before,
00:22:37.960 but well before
00:22:38.880 you get to total equality
00:22:40.060 because the affirmative action
00:22:42.060 causes bad feelings
00:22:43.280 on its own,
00:22:44.660 right?
00:22:45.520 Affirmative action
00:22:46.520 by its nature
00:22:47.440 isn't a clean win
00:22:49.420 for black people.
00:22:51.320 It's a big advantage,
00:22:53.580 clearly,
00:22:54.140 but it's not a clean win
00:22:55.960 because there's a little
00:22:56.780 taint,
00:22:57.640 you know,
00:22:57.860 there's always
00:22:58.820 this suggestion
00:22:59.600 that,
00:23:01.020 well,
00:23:01.400 maybe you were,
00:23:02.360 you know,
00:23:02.660 one of those kind
00:23:03.340 of hirers.
00:23:04.540 You know,
00:23:04.660 maybe it wasn't
00:23:05.300 totally your talent,
00:23:06.640 which is completely unfair.
00:23:08.780 That's something
00:23:09.540 that white people 0.52
00:23:10.280 don't have to deal with.
00:23:11.900 It's completely unfair.
00:23:13.900 So,
00:23:14.940 what's fairest
00:23:16.040 for successful,
00:23:19.100 let's say,
00:23:20.080 black people
00:23:20.840 who want to make
00:23:21.580 something of themselves
00:23:22.460 and make a dent
00:23:23.780 in the corporate world
00:23:24.840 and, you know,
00:23:25.740 succeed and everything,
00:23:26.780 we need to get
00:23:27.840 to the point
00:23:28.320 where everybody
00:23:29.320 agrees they did it
00:23:30.380 on talent
00:23:31.020 and hard work.
00:23:33.960 Wouldn't that be cool?
00:23:35.900 That seems like
00:23:36.520 the least racist
00:23:37.340 place we could be.
00:23:38.980 But at the moment,
00:23:40.180 if you have
00:23:40.760 any kind of,
00:23:41.440 you know,
00:23:41.860 quotas or preferences,
00:23:43.500 it's just purely racist.
00:23:45.200 So,
00:23:45.820 I think we've gotten
00:23:46.500 to the point
00:23:47.020 in society
00:23:47.720 where racist
00:23:49.740 is no longer
00:23:50.580 a bad word
00:23:51.340 because we actually
00:23:54.000 design things
00:23:54.880 to racism,
00:23:56.500 you know,
00:23:56.760 both ways.
00:23:58.300 Yeah.
00:23:58.760 So,
00:23:59.560 I would agree,
00:24:01.120 for example,
00:24:01.640 that the school systems
00:24:03.300 are racist
00:24:04.820 because they very much
00:24:08.120 favor people
00:24:08.820 out of money
00:24:09.300 because the people
00:24:10.120 with money
00:24:10.520 can go to a better school,
00:24:11.940 they can go to
00:24:12.560 private school,
00:24:13.720 et cetera.
00:24:13.940 And because of,
00:24:15.880 in my opinion,
00:24:17.700 systemic racism
00:24:18.720 forever,
00:24:20.020 black schools
00:24:20.760 are inadequate,
00:24:22.600 totally inadequate.
00:24:24.780 So,
00:24:25.600 you know,
00:24:25.860 there's tons
00:24:27.420 of racism
00:24:29.380 happening
00:24:29.840 and tons of,
00:24:31.180 let's say,
00:24:31.880 racism
00:24:32.320 that's engineered
00:24:33.440 in to correct
00:24:34.420 other racism,
00:24:35.600 but we have now
00:24:36.600 a thoroughly racist
00:24:37.700 society.
00:24:39.500 So,
00:24:39.860 all yesterday
00:24:40.600 people were calling
00:24:41.440 me a racist
00:24:41.940 and I thought,
00:24:43.460 well,
00:24:43.640 that's true.
00:24:44.280 That's exactly
00:24:44.880 what I said.
00:24:46.240 It's also exactly
00:24:47.140 what everybody
00:24:47.760 else is saying.
00:24:49.300 I mean,
00:24:49.940 different topics,
00:24:51.600 but we're at the point
00:24:52.580 where 100%
00:24:53.320 of people are racist
00:24:54.160 and it would be
00:24:55.600 kind of stupid
00:24:56.480 to act like
00:24:57.340 it's not true.
00:24:59.360 So,
00:25:00.000 let me ask you this.
00:25:03.320 Do you think
00:25:03.980 you should spend time
00:25:05.240 with a group
00:25:06.160 if half of the group
00:25:08.280 dislikes you
00:25:09.720 for some reason?
00:25:10.940 Let's say
00:25:11.340 half of the group
00:25:11.940 has a bad feeling
00:25:12.680 about you
00:25:13.140 because of racism.
00:25:15.680 That's what
00:25:16.260 the Rasmussen poll
00:25:17.100 said.
00:25:18.000 Why would you
00:25:18.460 spend time
00:25:19.100 with a group
00:25:19.760 half of whom
00:25:21.200 don't like you?
00:25:23.340 Why would you
00:25:24.040 do that?
00:25:25.180 Would that be stupid?
00:25:27.180 Now,
00:25:27.640 what people said
00:25:28.760 is you're being racist
00:25:30.060 and again,
00:25:30.680 I'm saying
00:25:31.000 that's exactly
00:25:31.760 what I'm being.
00:25:32.960 No,
00:25:33.320 not even a little bit
00:25:34.260 not.
00:25:35.560 Precisely,
00:25:36.120 exactly racist.
00:25:37.120 because any group
00:25:39.980 that half of them
00:25:41.160 who get polled
00:25:42.460 say that
00:25:43.060 it's not okay
00:25:43.680 to meet me,
00:25:44.560 I don't want
00:25:45.200 to spend time
00:25:45.740 with them.
00:25:46.540 Why would you?
00:25:48.700 Now,
00:25:49.240 some people,
00:25:50.140 the dumb people
00:25:50.760 who want to
00:25:51.980 cause trouble,
00:25:53.320 imagine that I meant
00:25:54.640 that all white people 0.95
00:25:57.160 should stay away
00:25:57.860 from all black people
00:25:58.960 in all scenarios.
00:25:59.760 How many of you
00:26:01.980 are dumb enough
00:26:02.600 to think that
00:26:03.120 I thought that?
00:26:03.700 Is there anybody
00:26:06.460 who wants to admit
00:26:07.100 they're dumb enough
00:26:07.820 to think that I meant
00:26:09.420 that all white people 0.95
00:26:10.340 should avoid
00:26:10.860 all black people?
00:26:13.000 Come on,
00:26:13.720 you can admit it.
00:26:14.800 You can admit
00:26:15.480 you were dumb enough
00:26:16.220 to think that's
00:26:16.840 what I said
00:26:17.460 because all of our
00:26:18.560 social media people
00:26:19.440 are saying it.
00:26:20.600 You can admit it.
00:26:21.520 Just admit it in public.
00:26:23.100 Admit that you're
00:26:23.700 dumb enough
00:26:24.220 to think that I meant
00:26:25.520 all white people
00:26:26.240 and all black people
00:26:27.000 should act just the same.
00:26:29.680 You can admit it.
00:26:31.280 There you go.
00:26:32.200 There's somebody
00:26:32.640 who's willing to admit
00:26:33.400 how dumb they are
00:26:34.060 and I appreciate that.
00:26:35.280 That's honest.
00:26:36.820 That's honest.
00:26:38.600 All right.
00:26:39.720 So,
00:26:40.380 let's see what else
00:26:41.800 people said.
00:26:44.060 So,
00:26:44.520 the way it's being portrayed
00:26:45.440 is,
00:26:46.380 of course,
00:26:47.140 because the media
00:26:47.840 is dishonest. 0.66
00:26:49.420 The way it's being portrayed
00:26:50.480 is that I don't want
00:26:51.900 to be around black people
00:26:52.980 because I don't like them.
00:26:54.980 Have I ever said
00:26:55.640 anything like that?
00:26:58.100 Does that sound like
00:26:59.000 anything I've ever said?
00:27:02.580 No.
00:27:03.400 I've actually
00:27:04.240 identified as black
00:27:05.680 for years
00:27:06.380 until this week.
00:27:08.280 Why?
00:27:09.420 Because I like them
00:27:10.100 so much.
00:27:11.160 I love black people.
00:27:13.060 Like,
00:27:13.460 literally.
00:27:14.400 Literally love them.
00:27:17.060 Now,
00:27:17.660 that's,
00:27:18.340 again,
00:27:18.860 a bigoted statement,
00:27:20.020 is it not?
00:27:21.600 Isn't that racist?
00:27:24.180 Yes.
00:27:25.340 Yes,
00:27:25.920 it is.
00:27:26.180 I just said
00:27:27.800 I love black people,
00:27:28.960 which is true,
00:27:30.960 and that's a racist statement.
00:27:35.680 And I'm proud of it.
00:27:37.840 Now,
00:27:38.440 individuals
00:27:39.060 should always be
00:27:41.240 judged as individuals.
00:27:43.620 Did anybody think
00:27:44.680 that I was opposed
00:27:46.040 to judging individuals
00:27:47.640 as individuals?
00:27:49.720 Of course not.
00:27:51.340 Of course not.
00:27:53.340 I don't know.
00:27:54.000 Did you see
00:27:54.480 Hotep Jesus 0.82
00:27:55.840 did a video response
00:27:57.540 to my video?
00:27:59.020 I was just listening
00:27:59.900 to it this morning.
00:28:01.180 It was kind of brilliant,
00:28:02.680 and I love this guy.
00:28:03.840 I love Hotep.
00:28:04.900 I've been on his show.
00:28:06.280 Terrific guy.
00:28:07.680 And, you know,
00:28:08.180 he has some,
00:28:08.680 he has some speculations
00:28:10.500 about me.
00:28:11.340 I'll let,
00:28:11.900 I'll let his speculations
00:28:13.620 speak for themselves,
00:28:15.060 so I won't comment
00:28:16.560 on them at the moment.
00:28:18.000 Now,
00:28:18.240 he invited me
00:28:18.860 on his show
00:28:19.380 and invited me
00:28:20.980 to, you know,
00:28:21.860 respond.
00:28:24.460 Well,
00:28:24.960 do you think
00:28:25.740 I don't love that guy?
00:28:27.800 Do you think
00:28:28.260 I don't love
00:28:28.920 Hotep Jesus?
00:28:29.880 I love that guy.
00:28:31.320 He's terrific.
00:28:32.720 Yeah.
00:28:33.100 Dr. Funk Juice,
00:28:34.400 you think I don't love him?
00:28:35.740 I love Dr. Funk Juice.
00:28:37.360 He's a regular here.
00:28:39.320 Yeah.
00:28:40.040 So anybody who thought
00:28:41.220 that it,
00:28:41.940 like,
00:28:42.980 that it applied
00:28:44.180 to individuals,
00:28:46.540 well,
00:28:46.780 how dumb was that?
00:28:48.720 I mean,
00:28:49.000 you have to,
00:28:49.420 you have to look
00:28:50.140 at yourself and say,
00:28:51.440 whoever said something
00:28:52.840 that applied to everybody
00:28:53.880 in any context,
00:28:56.460 it never applies
00:28:57.300 to everybody.
00:28:58.340 And it never applies
00:28:59.420 to every situation.
00:29:01.400 Let me,
00:29:01.680 here's another test
00:29:02.560 to see how dumb you are. 0.75
00:29:03.540 And you can admit it
00:29:04.320 if you're this dumb. 0.59
00:29:05.940 Did you think
00:29:06.980 that if I visited
00:29:08.860 a historically black college,
00:29:11.120 like,
00:29:11.400 I think that's where
00:29:12.000 Kamala was,
00:29:12.580 that I would be afraid
00:29:15.280 or would want
00:29:16.080 to run away
00:29:16.600 or wouldn't like
00:29:17.320 the people I met?
00:29:19.580 No.
00:29:20.880 No.
00:29:21.320 I would trust
00:29:22.560 that all of you
00:29:23.320 are smart enough
00:29:24.160 to know that,
00:29:25.980 you know,
00:29:26.540 sweeping statements
00:29:27.760 are,
00:29:29.420 of course,
00:29:30.320 always open
00:29:31.000 to lots of exceptions.
00:29:33.760 Everybody should know that.
00:29:35.080 You're all adults.
00:29:36.220 I shouldn't have
00:29:36.800 to explain to you
00:29:37.780 that generalities
00:29:39.280 don't apply
00:29:39.860 to all people.
00:29:40.520 That should be
00:29:41.540 the most basic thing
00:29:42.560 you know
00:29:43.000 as an adult.
00:29:45.700 And I hope you do.
00:29:49.080 I got some support
00:29:50.720 from Kim Creighton.
00:29:55.440 I'm judging
00:29:56.300 based on the profile
00:29:57.980 that Kim is a black 1.00
00:29:59.640 American woman.
00:30:01.360 She calls herself
00:30:02.140 an anti-racist economist.
00:30:04.260 And her pronouns
00:30:05.140 are she and her.
00:30:05.880 And what Kim said
00:30:09.340 about this situation
00:30:10.400 was, quote,
00:30:11.360 talk about me,
00:30:12.680 he cited a recent poll.
00:30:14.780 He said,
00:30:15.280 shows that nearly
00:30:15.980 half of all blacks
00:30:16.940 are not okay
00:30:17.620 with white people.
00:30:19.100 And then Kim goes on,
00:30:20.640 this is so funny to me
00:30:21.940 that white folks 0.70
00:30:24.060 spelled F-O-L-X
00:30:25.660 folks.
00:30:27.980 That's interesting.
00:30:29.160 Are surprised
00:30:29.860 because blacks 0.96
00:30:30.640 are not okay
00:30:31.360 with white people.
00:30:32.760 Given history
00:30:33.420 and today,
00:30:34.240 why should we be?
00:30:36.600 Exactly.
00:30:38.360 Exactly.
00:30:40.200 I agree.
00:30:43.140 So here's a black woman 1.00
00:30:44.700 who's agreeing
00:30:45.660 that I should feel
00:30:47.520 uncomfortable
00:30:48.120 around populations
00:30:50.220 of black people
00:30:51.080 because some large
00:30:52.920 group of them
00:30:53.560 would have a reasonable,
00:30:57.120 historically based,
00:30:59.080 bad opinion of me.
00:31:01.820 Now this was my point.
00:31:04.240 Right?
00:31:05.180 My point is that
00:31:06.760 some large percentage,
00:31:08.900 and I'm not sure
00:31:09.680 that the Rasmussen poll
00:31:10.820 had exactly the right percentage.
00:31:12.760 One of the things
00:31:13.260 that Hotep Jesus 0.97
00:31:15.060 pointed out correctly
00:31:16.200 is that the nature
00:31:17.920 of the question
00:31:18.660 was so open
00:31:19.960 to interpretation
00:31:20.820 that you don't really
00:31:21.980 know where
00:31:22.520 that would have
00:31:24.840 fallen out
00:31:25.360 if they'd asked
00:31:25.900 the question differently.
00:31:26.620 But whether or not
00:31:29.700 nearly half
00:31:30.800 of all black people
00:31:31.700 have the opinion,
00:31:33.860 or if it's only 25%,
00:31:36.780 it's still way too much.
00:31:39.560 Way too much.
00:31:41.600 Would you hang around
00:31:43.560 in a group
00:31:44.040 where 25% of them
00:31:45.440 had a bad feeling
00:31:47.000 about you?
00:31:48.480 I recommend getting away
00:31:50.040 from any group
00:31:50.860 where 25% of them
00:31:52.840 have a bad feeling
00:31:53.640 about you.
00:31:54.080 That's just not
00:31:55.220 a safe place to be.
00:31:59.460 And it doesn't matter
00:32:00.360 who you are,
00:32:01.100 what ethnicity you are,
00:32:02.480 et cetera.
00:32:03.300 If you were a black, 0.99
00:32:06.320 let's say you're
00:32:07.080 a young black person,
00:32:08.600 and you had a chance
00:32:10.040 to hang around
00:32:10.680 with a bunch
00:32:11.260 of white supremacists,
00:32:13.080 it's probably a bad idea.
00:32:15.360 I'd say run away.
00:32:17.540 I'd say run away.
00:32:18.320 Now let's say
00:32:19.380 they're not all
00:32:20.120 white supremacists,
00:32:21.600 but let's say
00:32:22.180 they're not condemning them.
00:32:24.400 You know what I mean?
00:32:25.820 They're not white supremacists,
00:32:27.660 per se.
00:32:29.700 But let's say
00:32:30.360 there's a group of people
00:32:31.280 who refuses to condemn them
00:32:33.080 for whatever reason.
00:32:35.080 If you were black, 0.99
00:32:35.860 would you hang around
00:32:36.420 with that group of people?
00:32:38.620 I wouldn't.
00:32:41.420 And I would recommend
00:32:42.940 that you don't either.
00:32:44.400 All right,
00:32:44.620 now there's a second part
00:32:45.620 of this so-called controversy
00:32:47.740 that isn't really
00:32:48.520 a controversy.
00:32:49.120 The reason this is
00:32:50.420 not a controversy
00:32:51.100 is that nobody
00:32:51.780 disagrees with me.
00:32:53.720 By the way,
00:32:54.400 you've caught that, right?
00:32:56.500 Nobody disagrees with me.
00:32:58.620 Some people
00:32:59.320 have misinterpreted it
00:33:00.560 so they'd have something
00:33:01.400 to, you know,
00:33:02.300 jabber about.
00:33:03.280 But nobody disagrees
00:33:04.340 with any of my points,
00:33:05.680 black or white.
00:33:07.460 Right?
00:33:08.100 That the temperature
00:33:10.800 of the country
00:33:12.100 has gotten so bad
00:33:13.420 that it's actually
00:33:15.320 dangerous to mix
00:33:16.860 across ethnicities
00:33:19.440 in some cases.
00:33:21.020 Not every case.
00:33:22.360 But there are some cases
00:33:23.280 where the temperature
00:33:24.400 is just so high
00:33:25.300 that I would just
00:33:26.420 stay away.
00:33:27.780 I'd say,
00:33:28.060 it looks a little
00:33:28.660 dangerous to me.
00:33:31.020 So,
00:33:31.680 the other,
00:33:33.540 the second thing is,
00:33:34.540 I said separately,
00:33:36.400 but then I think
00:33:36.940 I've combined them,
00:33:37.840 so these are two things
00:33:38.720 that got kind of conflated,
00:33:40.540 that things are so bad
00:33:42.640 in the black American
00:33:44.000 communities,
00:33:44.780 in my opinion,
00:33:46.660 because of systemic racism.
00:33:48.860 So the, you know,
00:33:49.940 economics are bad,
00:33:51.200 that's always a breeding
00:33:52.060 ground for crime,
00:33:53.660 crime is high,
00:33:54.600 there's a lot of
00:33:55.140 racial hatred,
00:33:56.180 et cetera.
00:33:57.200 And so,
00:33:58.300 as a proxy,
00:34:00.480 just as a,
00:34:01.180 like a flag
00:34:02.400 or an indicator,
00:34:03.940 you don't want to go
00:34:04.980 where there's a high
00:34:05.900 percentage of urban
00:34:07.160 black population.
00:34:09.840 And you should run away
00:34:10.740 from that as fast
00:34:11.440 as you can.
00:34:11.880 But here's the part
00:34:13.060 I think,
00:34:13.580 I think was missing
00:34:14.580 from my analysis.
00:34:16.420 You should do that
00:34:17.380 if you're black.
00:34:20.240 You get that,
00:34:21.120 right?
00:34:22.400 Let's say,
00:34:23.200 you're a single mom,
00:34:24.760 I'll just,
00:34:25.200 you know,
00:34:25.460 paint a picture here.
00:34:26.740 It doesn't have to be
00:34:27.400 a single mom.
00:34:28.580 Let the single mom away, 1.00
00:34:30.060 because that,
00:34:30.560 that's a distraction.
00:34:31.800 Let's say you are
00:34:32.600 black parents,
00:34:34.020 and you've got a kid
00:34:35.300 who's got,
00:34:35.920 you think has some potential.
00:34:37.760 You're like,
00:34:38.120 I think my kid
00:34:39.000 can get out of this place.
00:34:41.880 What would be
00:34:43.440 the best thing
00:34:44.280 for you to do
00:34:44.960 as black parents
00:34:46.040 to support
00:34:47.180 your black son
00:34:48.560 or daughter?
00:34:50.100 Move.
00:34:50.780 Yeah.
00:34:51.300 And where would you
00:34:51.920 move to?
00:34:53.760 Well,
00:34:54.500 unfortunately,
00:34:55.680 because of years
00:34:56.780 of systemic racism,
00:34:58.480 finding a mostly
00:34:59.760 black neighborhood
00:35:00.580 that would be
00:35:03.200 really focused
00:35:03.920 on education
00:35:04.720 and advancement
00:35:05.620 and low crime,
00:35:07.620 it would be hard
00:35:08.340 to find.
00:35:09.460 Now,
00:35:09.640 I don't know
00:35:09.980 that there are none,
00:35:11.180 you know,
00:35:11.940 there might be,
00:35:12.840 but the correlation
00:35:14.420 is so strong
00:35:15.560 because of systemic racism
00:35:18.120 for years,
00:35:19.400 in my opinion,
00:35:20.620 that's why,
00:35:21.500 that you could
00:35:22.560 actually use it
00:35:23.300 as a decision-making
00:35:24.580 gauge
00:35:25.660 and that all
00:35:26.880 white people do.
00:35:28.180 They just don't
00:35:28.740 talk about it.
00:35:29.780 All Asian Americans
00:35:30.900 do.
00:35:31.680 They just don't
00:35:32.240 talk about it.
00:35:33.180 And all black people
00:35:34.480 do.
00:35:35.200 They just don't
00:35:35.900 talk about it.
00:35:36.540 I'm going to tell
00:35:39.060 you something
00:35:39.420 that happened
00:35:39.840 to me yesterday
00:35:40.420 to make my point.
00:35:42.860 I got a phone call
00:35:44.000 from somebody
00:35:44.580 I'd worked with
00:35:45.700 professionally
00:35:46.200 who was very
00:35:47.920 disturbed
00:35:48.420 about my statements
00:35:50.880 because he was
00:35:53.940 married to a black
00:35:54.800 woman and she was 1.00
00:35:55.720 very disturbed
00:35:56.460 about it.
00:35:57.460 And she said
00:35:58.060 that they lived
00:35:59.060 in an upscale
00:35:59.840 white neighborhood
00:36:00.520 and she was
00:36:02.960 concerned that
00:36:03.880 my attitude
00:36:04.400 might catch on
00:36:05.840 and she would
00:36:06.780 be ostracized
00:36:07.700 in her white
00:36:08.680 neighborhood.
00:36:10.680 Have you ever
00:36:11.420 met anybody
00:36:12.080 who would ostracize
00:36:13.280 a black woman 0.97
00:36:14.540 in a high-end
00:36:15.680 neighborhood?
00:36:17.860 Like, I don't
00:36:18.680 think that's
00:36:19.040 ever happened.
00:36:20.400 Like, maybe
00:36:21.120 in the history
00:36:21.620 of the entire
00:36:22.160 world.
00:36:23.520 Not a woman 1.00
00:36:24.160 and not in a
00:36:25.520 high-end
00:36:26.020 upscale neighborhood.
00:36:27.380 So, I have
00:36:29.660 great empathy
00:36:30.220 and I'm sorry
00:36:30.980 that her
00:36:31.840 feelings were
00:36:32.440 hurt, but she
00:36:33.960 doesn't have
00:36:34.340 any risk.
00:36:35.680 You know, let
00:36:36.260 me explain how
00:36:37.120 white people
00:36:37.580 work.
00:36:38.900 If you're a 0.88
00:36:40.680 black woman 1.00
00:36:42.480 living in a
00:36:44.520 high-end
00:36:44.940 white neighborhood,
00:36:45.880 you are
00:36:46.120 completely
00:36:46.620 accepted.
00:36:48.000 Completely.
00:36:50.520 That's my
00:36:51.320 experience.
00:36:52.700 Like, I can
00:36:53.380 speak for my
00:36:54.000 own neighborhood,
00:36:54.900 right?
00:36:55.720 So, you
00:36:56.880 know, there's
00:36:57.360 like literally
00:36:58.320 zero, any
00:37:00.320 kind of
00:37:01.140 discrimination
00:37:03.080 that you
00:37:03.960 could find
00:37:04.360 anywhere.
00:37:05.220 It just
00:37:05.560 doesn't exist.
00:37:06.920 In my
00:37:07.280 neighborhood.
00:37:08.600 And I think
00:37:09.320 that's not that
00:37:09.920 uncommon.
00:37:11.080 But here's
00:37:11.600 the punchline.
00:37:14.420 They were
00:37:14.900 complaining about
00:37:15.680 my point of
00:37:16.360 view that you
00:37:17.160 should get
00:37:17.560 away from
00:37:18.260 black people.
00:37:20.080 I remember
00:37:20.480 that was in
00:37:21.000 context.
00:37:22.000 If you're
00:37:22.280 in a context,
00:37:23.200 it sounds
00:37:23.500 completely
00:37:23.880 different.
00:37:25.300 But they
00:37:26.100 had done the
00:37:26.760 same thing.
00:37:28.320 They had
00:37:28.980 moved away
00:37:29.500 from black
00:37:29.940 people to
00:37:31.520 live with
00:37:31.900 white people.
00:37:33.980 That was
00:37:34.620 my point.
00:37:36.560 So the
00:37:37.200 very thing
00:37:37.700 that they
00:37:38.060 did to
00:37:39.000 organize their
00:37:39.660 life was
00:37:40.720 exactly what
00:37:41.380 I recommend.
00:37:42.220 It wouldn't
00:37:42.740 matter if
00:37:43.120 you're white 0.98
00:37:43.480 or black.
00:37:44.700 You should
00:37:45.040 get away from
00:37:45.640 concentrations of
00:37:46.860 inner city,
00:37:48.200 you know,
00:37:48.420 terrible schools
00:37:49.240 and whatever
00:37:50.040 culture is not
00:37:50.920 working.
00:37:51.560 Now, I don't
00:37:51.860 know why it's
00:37:52.380 not working.
00:37:52.920 I think
00:37:53.220 systemic racism
00:37:54.280 is the
00:37:55.120 base reason.
00:37:57.960 Then here's
00:37:58.700 the other
00:37:58.940 thing that
00:37:59.760 is why
00:38:02.560 the response
00:38:03.360 to me is
00:38:04.000 not as big
00:38:04.900 as you
00:38:05.480 might expect.
00:38:07.000 Did you
00:38:07.500 think there
00:38:07.820 would be
00:38:08.000 more pushback
00:38:08.680 to what I
00:38:09.060 said?
00:38:10.020 I mean,
00:38:10.240 there's a lot,
00:38:11.440 but didn't
00:38:11.780 you think
00:38:12.040 there would
00:38:12.240 be more?
00:38:13.980 Do you know
00:38:14.340 what they
00:38:14.580 don't want
00:38:14.960 to hear?
00:38:15.620 They is
00:38:16.080 all white
00:38:16.620 people.
00:38:17.300 You know,
00:38:17.480 I'm not
00:38:17.740 talking about
00:38:18.120 black people.
00:38:19.180 Do you know
00:38:19.460 what all white
00:38:20.060 people don't
00:38:20.560 want to hear?
00:38:20.900 everybody who
00:38:23.900 ever succeeded
00:38:24.740 did it the
00:38:25.800 same way.
00:38:29.040 That's like,
00:38:30.060 that's the
00:38:30.640 most dangerous
00:38:31.200 message in
00:38:31.820 America.
00:38:32.940 Everyone who
00:38:33.680 ever succeeded
00:38:34.340 did it the
00:38:34.880 same way.
00:38:36.060 Five things
00:38:36.720 you've got to
00:38:37.080 get right.
00:38:38.800 Number one,
00:38:41.060 stay in a
00:38:41.720 jail.
00:38:43.320 Number two,
00:38:44.860 don't be
00:38:45.520 addicted to
00:38:47.180 alcohol or
00:38:47.860 drugs.
00:38:49.040 Number three,
00:38:49.720 don't start
00:38:50.900 a family
00:38:51.380 too young
00:38:52.000 before you're
00:38:52.580 ready.
00:38:54.420 Right?
00:38:54.720 And if you
00:38:55.120 do,
00:38:55.560 stay married.
00:38:57.500 Number four,
00:38:59.180 make education
00:39:00.140 or training,
00:39:01.580 you know,
00:39:01.760 any form of
00:39:02.580 learning,
00:39:03.360 your top
00:39:03.900 priority
00:39:04.380 through life.
00:39:06.840 Number five,
00:39:08.820 show some
00:39:09.380 character.
00:39:10.980 And that
00:39:11.260 would include
00:39:11.680 everything from
00:39:12.280 showing up on
00:39:12.960 time to,
00:39:14.560 you know,
00:39:14.920 being a good
00:39:15.440 person,
00:39:16.060 et cetera.
00:39:16.980 100% of the
00:39:18.040 people,
00:39:19.040 yeah,
00:39:19.260 I won't say
00:39:19.740 100%,
00:39:20.240 but everybody
00:39:21.400 who succeeded
00:39:22.160 pretty much
00:39:23.880 did it that
00:39:24.400 way.
00:39:25.360 Now,
00:39:25.740 which part of
00:39:26.180 that is
00:39:26.480 unavailable to
00:39:27.720 black America?
00:39:29.160 None of it.
00:39:30.220 It's all
00:39:30.720 available.
00:39:32.020 It's all
00:39:32.700 available.
00:39:33.840 Right?
00:39:34.380 And we are
00:39:35.920 treating black 1.00
00:39:37.200 Americans like
00:39:38.020 infants to
00:39:39.520 imagine they're
00:39:40.180 the only group
00:39:41.160 who can't do
00:39:42.380 the most obvious
00:39:43.240 thing that
00:39:44.060 everybody knows
00:39:44.820 how to do.
00:39:45.760 Everybody.
00:39:46.180 And it's
00:39:47.300 the only
00:39:47.580 group that
00:39:47.960 can't do
00:39:48.320 it?
00:39:49.740 That's pretty
00:39:50.460 racist, 0.77
00:39:50.920 isn't it?
00:39:51.940 To imagine
00:39:52.800 that there's
00:39:53.320 only one
00:39:53.840 group that
00:39:54.600 can't use
00:39:55.260 the same
00:39:55.680 formula that
00:39:56.380 everybody uses,
00:39:57.880 they're the
00:39:58.240 only group
00:39:58.640 that can't
00:39:58.980 use that
00:39:59.340 simple,
00:39:59.880 easy formula.
00:40:01.200 That is
00:40:02.000 super racist.
00:40:03.460 Is it not?
00:40:05.820 I mean,
00:40:06.500 almost our
00:40:07.040 entire structure
00:40:07.840 is built
00:40:08.380 around black
00:40:09.120 inferiority,
00:40:10.300 which is not
00:40:11.240 demonstrated by
00:40:12.080 anything I'm
00:40:12.760 aware of.
00:40:13.240 Because I
00:40:15.660 know somebody's
00:40:16.180 going to say,
00:40:16.600 oh, it's
00:40:17.080 IQ, it's
00:40:17.720 IQ, but
00:40:18.880 that doesn't
00:40:20.080 explain any
00:40:20.660 of this.
00:40:21.980 It doesn't.
00:40:22.980 It just
00:40:23.320 doesn't.
00:40:25.080 Because black 0.98
00:40:26.260 Americans do
00:40:26.880 great when they
00:40:27.920 have good
00:40:28.500 situations.
00:40:29.720 They do
00:40:30.040 great.
00:40:30.380 Everybody does.
00:40:31.240 Basically,
00:40:31.860 everybody does
00:40:33.020 great if they
00:40:34.340 follow the
00:40:34.880 five rules.
00:40:37.600 Now, not
00:40:38.460 everybody is
00:40:39.060 going to be
00:40:39.660 doing rocket
00:40:41.740 science.
00:40:42.100 See, the
00:40:43.040 thing that
00:40:43.500 white racists
00:40:44.480 get wrong
00:40:45.000 all the
00:40:45.460 time, and
00:40:46.160 I have to
00:40:46.480 explain this
00:40:47.020 to you
00:40:47.280 again, I
00:40:48.280 feel like I
00:40:48.640 explain this
00:40:49.160 all the
00:40:49.440 time.
00:40:51.240 Among men
00:40:52.240 in particular,
00:40:53.060 there's such
00:40:53.420 variance in
00:40:54.440 IQ that if
00:40:56.820 there are a
00:40:57.100 bunch of
00:40:57.360 people at
00:40:57.720 the top or
00:40:58.400 a bunch of
00:40:58.800 people at
00:40:59.140 the bottom,
00:41:00.280 it skews
00:41:00.740 the average.
00:41:03.080 So there
00:41:04.440 are a whole
00:41:04.720 bunch of
00:41:05.300 white people
00:41:06.220 who are
00:41:07.340 super,
00:41:07.940 super smart
00:41:08.640 and inventing
00:41:10.160 technology and
00:41:11.960 stuff, but
00:41:12.720 I'm not
00:41:13.160 one of
00:41:13.480 them.
00:41:14.680 I'm not
00:41:15.300 one of
00:41:15.580 them.
00:41:16.340 Chances 0.72
00:41:16.640 are you're
00:41:17.040 not either.
00:41:18.560 So to
00:41:19.360 lump me in
00:41:20.260 with these
00:41:20.760 geniuses that 0.84
00:41:21.540 are not
00:41:21.880 me, how
00:41:23.500 does that
00:41:23.820 make sense?
00:41:25.340 How do
00:41:25.940 you take
00:41:26.300 these freaks
00:41:27.480 of nature
00:41:27.940 who are
00:41:28.320 super smart
00:41:29.000 and then
00:41:30.060 average them
00:41:30.740 with you
00:41:31.520 and me?
00:41:33.120 And then
00:41:33.760 think you
00:41:34.120 have something.
00:41:35.000 Oh, I've
00:41:35.520 got something
00:41:36.020 that's useful
00:41:36.620 because I
00:41:37.420 average people
00:41:38.100 who are
00:41:38.300 completely
00:41:38.720 different.
00:41:39.100 It would
00:41:41.060 make sense
00:41:41.600 to compare
00:41:42.220 IQ of
00:41:43.920 any two
00:41:44.540 groups if
00:41:45.800 all of
00:41:46.180 their IQs
00:41:46.760 were the
00:41:47.080 same within
00:41:47.700 the group.
00:41:49.080 Well, then
00:41:49.480 you'd have
00:41:49.800 something.
00:41:51.700 But otherwise
00:41:53.000 all you're
00:41:53.440 doing is
00:41:53.780 averaging things
00:41:54.620 that don't
00:41:54.980 make sense
00:41:55.420 to be
00:41:55.720 averaged.
00:41:57.380 Right?
00:41:58.500 It just
00:41:59.200 doesn't make
00:41:59.580 sense.
00:42:00.380 Because
00:42:00.900 everybody gets
00:42:01.580 treated as
00:42:02.140 an individual
00:42:02.720 ultimately.
00:42:04.300 So, you
00:42:05.300 know, that
00:42:06.260 the IQ
00:42:07.480 thing, whether
00:42:08.160 it's true
00:42:08.820 or not
00:42:09.540 true, it
00:42:10.380 doesn't
00:42:10.640 have, it
00:42:11.200 doesn't
00:42:11.480 translate into
00:42:12.220 real world
00:42:12.960 action and
00:42:13.980 it just
00:42:14.880 doesn't work
00:42:15.760 in the real
00:42:16.160 world.
00:42:16.820 So it
00:42:17.240 wouldn't
00:42:17.380 matter if
00:42:17.780 it were
00:42:17.980 true.
00:42:18.680 And it
00:42:19.140 doesn't
00:42:19.400 matter how
00:42:19.860 smart white
00:42:20.720 people are
00:42:21.240 on average
00:42:21.900 if you're
00:42:22.760 not one
00:42:23.160 of them.
00:42:24.520 Right?
00:42:25.300 It doesn't
00:42:25.920 matter how
00:42:26.320 smart I
00:42:26.840 am, it
00:42:27.220 does not
00:42:27.600 accrue to
00:42:28.280 any other
00:42:28.820 white people.
00:42:29.980 If I'm
00:42:30.620 very successful,
00:42:32.300 no other
00:42:32.840 white people
00:42:33.280 get to
00:42:33.600 take credit
00:42:34.000 for that.
00:42:35.280 That's just
00:42:35.700 me.
00:42:36.880 If, you
00:42:37.240 know, if
00:42:37.600 Michael Jordan
00:42:38.180 is successful,
00:42:39.360 that doesn't
00:42:40.100 mean all
00:42:40.520 black people
00:42:41.120 can play in
00:42:42.140 the NBA.
00:42:43.440 Right?
00:42:43.840 You can't
00:42:44.480 average Michael
00:42:46.240 Jordan with
00:42:48.000 everybody who
00:42:48.680 plays basketball
00:42:49.480 and say that
00:42:50.120 that gave you
00:42:50.760 something useful.
00:42:52.480 It didn't.
00:42:53.760 That's not
00:42:54.240 useful.
00:42:56.440 Anyway, so
00:42:57.460 if you learn
00:42:57.840 to stop
00:42:58.200 averaging things
00:42:59.040 that don't
00:42:59.400 make sense
00:42:59.860 being averaged
00:43:00.620 together and
00:43:01.140 compared,
00:43:02.240 just,
00:43:02.840 just know
00:43:04.000 that it
00:43:04.280 doesn't make
00:43:04.680 sense.
00:43:05.900 Yeah, so
00:43:06.280 everybody has
00:43:06.800 the same
00:43:07.320 path out.
00:43:08.560 And it
00:43:08.960 usually takes
00:43:09.460 one generation.
00:43:12.300 The black 0.94
00:43:13.140 America could
00:43:13.860 be back on
00:43:14.800 path if
00:43:16.420 schools could
00:43:17.080 be fixed.
00:43:18.080 So right
00:43:18.520 now, black
00:43:18.960 America is
00:43:19.520 completely
00:43:20.160 handicapped by
00:43:21.840 a system
00:43:22.900 which is
00:43:23.780 broken.
00:43:24.660 And the
00:43:25.180 school, the
00:43:27.380 teachers' 0.80
00:43:27.840 unions in
00:43:28.340 particular, I
00:43:29.380 would point
00:43:29.760 out as the
00:43:30.420 main source of
00:43:31.420 systemic racism.
00:43:32.840 the main
00:43:34.120 source.
00:43:36.080 All right.
00:43:40.960 Let me ask
00:43:41.760 you this.
00:43:44.000 How many
00:43:44.760 black viewers
00:43:46.600 do I have?
00:43:47.700 Is anybody
00:43:48.280 black besides 0.99
00:43:51.060 Dr. Funk
00:43:53.000 Juice?
00:43:54.840 A few?
00:43:55.200 All right.
00:43:55.720 So let me
00:43:57.020 see if I can
00:43:57.500 ask this
00:43:57.920 question.
00:44:00.160 And I'm
00:44:02.040 only going to
00:44:02.500 ask you if
00:44:03.640 you're black. 0.79
00:44:04.440 Okay?
00:44:05.360 So if you are
00:44:06.280 black, if you
00:44:07.460 identify as
00:44:08.040 black, let's
00:44:08.480 say, say, you
00:44:09.640 know, black
00:44:10.320 colon, and then
00:44:11.420 give me the
00:44:11.840 answer so I
00:44:12.940 know that it's
00:44:13.400 not the white 0.95
00:44:13.940 people jumping
00:44:14.540 in here.
00:44:15.320 Because you know
00:44:15.900 the white people
00:44:16.420 ruin everything.
00:44:17.100 So white 0.86
00:44:18.720 people, don't
00:44:19.800 ruin this
00:44:20.260 poll.
00:44:22.680 Here's the
00:44:23.260 question.
00:44:25.020 If you're
00:44:25.700 black and
00:44:28.300 you knew
00:44:28.900 that, let's
00:44:29.980 say there was
00:44:30.360 a poll that
00:44:30.960 said white
00:44:31.460 people, half
00:44:33.340 of them would
00:44:34.180 not agree with
00:44:35.000 the idea that
00:44:35.780 black lives
00:44:36.400 matter.
00:44:37.520 Now, not
00:44:38.040 just because
00:44:38.840 they want to
00:44:39.300 add in all
00:44:39.880 lives matter and
00:44:40.740 be political
00:44:41.280 about it, but
00:44:42.220 what if the
00:44:43.300 way it was
00:44:43.720 asked was you
00:44:45.120 really, half
00:44:46.780 of them said
00:44:47.200 they don't
00:44:47.500 matter, would
00:44:49.260 you want to
00:44:49.820 spend time with
00:44:50.600 that group?
00:44:52.160 What would be
00:44:52.660 your best
00:44:53.040 strategy for
00:44:54.360 dealing with
00:44:54.940 that group of
00:44:55.520 people?
00:44:55.820 If you knew
00:44:56.460 that half of
00:44:58.060 them, roughly,
00:44:59.740 were not okay
00:45:00.700 with black
00:45:01.500 lives mattering,
00:45:03.080 would you want
00:45:03.540 to spend time
00:45:04.060 with them?
00:45:06.720 Black people,
00:45:08.480 I'm only looking
00:45:09.400 for black
00:45:09.940 answers right
00:45:10.520 now, which
00:45:11.400 is racist. 0.81
00:45:12.600 Can you agree?
00:45:14.020 Pretty racist,
00:45:15.020 right?
00:45:15.520 Favouring
00:45:15.960 black opinions.
00:45:19.220 But everything's
00:45:20.100 racist.
00:45:22.020 Black and
00:45:22.700 no.
00:45:23.200 Dr.
00:45:23.540 Feng Shui 0.57
00:45:23.900 says yes.
00:45:25.500 No.
00:45:28.520 And Dr.
00:45:29.300 Feng Shui 0.57
00:45:29.620 says I
00:45:29.820 believe you.
00:45:31.180 And I
00:45:31.580 believe the
00:45:31.980 others as
00:45:32.400 well.
00:45:37.420 I'm black
00:45:38.180 and you all
00:45:38.580 sound racist,
00:45:39.300 but I don't
00:45:39.580 blame you.
00:45:40.540 See, now
00:45:40.900 that's, that
00:45:43.140 is such a
00:45:45.020 high awareness
00:45:45.640 opinion.
00:45:48.060 I don't know
00:45:48.720 if you caught
00:45:49.080 that.
00:45:50.140 So a black 1.00
00:45:51.240 viewer just
00:45:51.820 said, I'm
00:45:52.320 black, you all 1.00
00:45:53.280 sound racist,
00:45:54.000 but I don't
00:45:54.340 blame you.
00:45:56.200 That's like the
00:45:57.000 perfect summary,
00:45:57.940 isn't it?
00:45:58.680 That's exactly
00:45:59.420 what I'm saying.
00:46:00.060 We should stop
00:46:02.360 separating things
00:46:03.580 by racist and
00:46:04.400 not racist,
00:46:04.960 because it is
00:46:05.420 all racist.
00:46:06.840 It's all
00:46:07.280 racist, from
00:46:08.540 top to
00:46:08.920 bottom.
00:46:09.760 I mean, it's
00:46:10.060 turtles all the
00:46:10.720 way down.
00:46:11.140 Christian Watson
00:46:16.060 says, you
00:46:16.760 uncritically
00:46:17.560 accepted the
00:46:18.400 Rasmussen poll
00:46:19.200 without any
00:46:20.320 further
00:46:20.640 investigation.
00:46:22.100 Well, I
00:46:22.640 wouldn't say
00:46:23.000 uncritically, but
00:46:24.600 your comment is
00:46:25.840 valid.
00:46:26.600 It's the same 0.53
00:46:27.060 one Hothep 0.75
00:46:29.200 Jesus made. 0.95
00:46:31.480 So can we
00:46:32.600 agree that if
00:46:36.060 the poll had
00:46:38.160 been completely
00:46:39.240 invalid, and
00:46:40.620 let's say the
00:46:41.080 number of
00:46:41.620 black Americans
00:46:42.560 who would say
00:46:43.240 such a thing
00:46:43.860 would be like
00:46:45.000 5%, you
00:46:46.280 know, sort
00:46:46.660 of trivial,
00:46:48.020 would I
00:46:48.700 change my
00:46:49.200 opinion, or
00:46:50.440 should I?
00:46:52.020 Or should I?
00:46:53.200 And I would
00:46:53.840 think, yes, that
00:46:55.180 would influence me,
00:46:56.380 because remember,
00:46:57.040 it's a data-driven
00:46:57.900 opinion.
00:47:00.660 So if the data
00:47:01.700 is wrong, but I
00:47:04.200 will point to
00:47:05.040 Kim Craytons,
00:47:06.220 who is a black
00:47:07.100 woman, whose 0.99
00:47:08.240 opinion was that
00:47:09.320 black people
00:47:10.520 should have, I
00:47:11.920 mean, it's
00:47:12.200 normal, and
00:47:12.740 nobody should be
00:47:13.340 surprised, that
00:47:14.740 black people are
00:47:15.480 not okay with
00:47:16.200 white people.
00:47:17.320 And I would say
00:47:18.140 that the
00:47:18.480 Rasmussen poll
00:47:20.240 is consistent
00:47:22.300 with, but this
00:47:23.140 is not a
00:47:23.600 science,
00:47:24.760 consistent with,
00:47:25.860 anecdotally,
00:47:27.660 the fact that
00:47:29.040 the media is
00:47:30.920 anti-white.
00:47:32.620 So if you have
00:47:33.540 a non-stop
00:47:34.440 education and
00:47:35.520 media system,
00:47:36.260 which is
00:47:36.800 consistently
00:47:37.460 anti-white,
00:47:39.380 which I think
00:47:40.440 everybody would
00:47:40.980 agree with.
00:47:42.420 Would the
00:47:43.420 black viewers
00:47:45.220 agree with that
00:47:45.740 statement?
00:47:46.900 That the media
00:47:47.820 is skewing
00:47:48.520 anti-white?
00:47:51.420 Or is that
00:47:52.140 just an
00:47:52.500 impression?
00:47:59.140 Implicit bias,
00:48:00.180 if you have a
00:48:00.680 brain, you have a
00:48:01.460 bias, yeah.
00:48:02.200 Yeah, there's no
00:48:02.780 such thing as not
00:48:03.500 having a bias.
00:48:04.160 I think we
00:48:06.420 treat ourselves
00:48:08.380 like children
00:48:09.120 when we act
00:48:10.660 like some of
00:48:11.280 us are unbiased.
00:48:13.600 That's kind of
00:48:14.380 dumb, isn't it?
00:48:16.940 Right?
00:48:17.520 So this is why
00:48:18.860 I so agree with
00:48:19.720 Kim Creighton,
00:48:21.100 who said,
00:48:22.400 you know,
00:48:22.700 based on
00:48:23.180 history,
00:48:24.460 based on,
00:48:25.220 you know,
00:48:26.160 what society
00:48:27.940 has put forth
00:48:29.180 as information,
00:48:31.380 she says that
00:48:32.320 black people
00:48:32.840 should have a
00:48:33.560 bad opinion
00:48:34.040 of white
00:48:34.700 people.
00:48:36.840 That's what I
00:48:37.560 was saying.
00:48:39.200 Now,
00:48:40.000 so,
00:48:40.960 to your point
00:48:41.560 about the
00:48:41.940 rest of the
00:48:42.320 poll,
00:48:42.840 I accept that
00:48:43.800 the nature of
00:48:44.540 the question
00:48:45.080 was vague
00:48:46.820 enough that
00:48:47.420 people could
00:48:47.860 have answered
00:48:48.340 it with
00:48:49.820 other understanding
00:48:51.740 of the question.
00:48:52.460 For example,
00:48:53.520 and this is
00:48:54.040 Hotep Jesus' 0.98
00:48:55.000 point,
00:48:55.880 one of the
00:48:56.540 ways you could
00:48:57.020 interpret that
00:48:57.640 was,
00:48:58.900 because of
00:48:59.620 the media
00:49:00.480 nature,
00:49:02.440 have they made
00:49:03.120 it seem like
00:49:03.700 it's not
00:49:04.320 okay to be
00:49:04.960 white,
00:49:05.840 which might
00:49:06.400 not be your
00:49:06.940 own opinion.
00:49:08.920 So some
00:49:09.660 people could
00:49:10.100 have answered
00:49:10.480 it not as
00:49:11.600 their own
00:49:12.060 opinion,
00:49:13.240 but rather
00:49:13.800 they could be
00:49:14.320 answering it
00:49:14.840 as,
00:49:15.640 has society
00:49:16.340 decided it's
00:49:17.240 not okay to
00:49:17.840 be white,
00:49:18.720 and might
00:49:19.200 actually be
00:49:19.740 answering in
00:49:20.240 a way that
00:49:20.600 was,
00:49:21.460 I would
00:49:22.100 consider it
00:49:22.680 positive.
00:49:23.020 In other words,
00:49:25.300 if you
00:49:26.000 were black
00:49:26.460 and you
00:49:26.740 answered that
00:49:27.200 question,
00:49:28.140 but what
00:49:28.620 you were
00:49:28.880 thinking
00:49:29.320 internally
00:49:29.940 was,
00:49:30.780 well,
00:49:31.040 I like
00:49:31.340 white people,
00:49:33.700 but society
00:49:35.300 is sort of
00:49:36.080 treating them
00:49:36.720 like it's
00:49:37.080 not okay to
00:49:37.680 be white.
00:49:38.640 So I'm
00:49:38.960 going to say
00:49:39.260 it's not
00:49:39.580 okay to
00:49:39.900 be white,
00:49:40.400 because I'm
00:49:40.680 answering
00:49:40.980 like for
00:49:41.440 society.
00:49:42.560 I'm not
00:49:42.880 talking about
00:49:43.320 my own.
00:49:48.320 Now,
00:49:48.780 I do know
00:49:49.200 what it means
00:49:49.700 to be of a
00:49:50.900 low IQ.
00:49:51.980 I do know
00:49:52.460 what that
00:49:52.720 means.
00:49:52.960 I think
00:49:54.360 you're
00:49:54.540 missing my
00:49:54.980 point,
00:49:55.320 though.
00:49:55.900 Everybody
00:49:56.200 knows what
00:49:56.760 that means.
00:49:57.740 Have you
00:49:58.020 noticed that
00:49:58.460 when people
00:49:58.880 disagree with
00:49:59.640 me,
00:50:00.720 they usually
00:50:01.480 assign an
00:50:02.700 opinion to
00:50:03.180 me that's
00:50:03.540 ridiculous before
00:50:04.580 disagreeing?
00:50:06.300 So here's
00:50:07.000 somebody who's
00:50:07.480 saying that I
00:50:07.940 don't understand
00:50:08.600 what it's like
00:50:09.280 to have a
00:50:09.860 low IQ.
00:50:11.620 I'm pretty
00:50:12.260 sure everybody
00:50:12.800 understands that.
00:50:14.380 Now,
00:50:14.620 did I say
00:50:15.100 that if you
00:50:15.440 had an IQ
00:50:15.880 of 80,
00:50:16.760 you could
00:50:17.400 become a
00:50:17.880 scientist?
00:50:18.960 Did you
00:50:19.340 imagine that I
00:50:20.120 thought that?
00:50:20.920 If only you
00:50:21.780 had all the
00:50:22.260 opportunities,
00:50:22.960 and went
00:50:23.740 to a good
00:50:24.120 school,
00:50:24.660 your IQ
00:50:25.340 of 80
00:50:25.740 would be
00:50:26.080 fine.
00:50:26.500 You could
00:50:26.740 be a
00:50:26.980 doctor.
00:50:27.720 Is that
00:50:28.040 what you
00:50:28.280 imagined about
00:50:28.940 my opinion?
00:50:30.500 Do you
00:50:30.960 see the
00:50:31.260 consistency?
00:50:32.220 I'm assigned
00:50:32.780 ridiculous
00:50:33.480 opinions because
00:50:34.920 my actual
00:50:35.600 opinions you
00:50:36.200 agree with.
00:50:39.400 My actual
00:50:40.400 opinions you
00:50:41.020 completely agree
00:50:41.840 with.
00:50:42.540 That's what's
00:50:43.200 dangerous about
00:50:43.860 this, isn't
00:50:44.340 it?
00:50:45.080 What's
00:50:45.540 dangerous is
00:50:46.120 not that you
00:50:46.600 disagree.
00:50:47.860 The reason
00:50:48.580 I'm trending
00:50:49.140 is because I
00:50:49.900 have many
00:50:50.180 people agreed,
00:50:51.740 not because I
00:50:52.460 have many
00:50:52.680 disagreed.
00:50:56.580 All right.
00:51:00.800 So that's
00:51:01.760 that.
00:51:03.620 I'm switching
00:51:04.540 my endorsement
00:51:05.320 from Trump
00:51:06.560 to Vivek,
00:51:10.580 Ramaswamy,
00:51:11.780 because as I've
00:51:12.840 been telling you
00:51:13.420 for a while,
00:51:14.140 I'm a one-issue
00:51:15.680 voter.
00:51:17.080 And while Trump
00:51:17.940 has said clearly
00:51:19.220 that he would
00:51:19.760 attack the
00:51:20.340 cartels for
00:51:22.200 fentanyl,
00:51:23.340 Vivek is
00:51:23.940 making a much
00:51:24.560 bigger emphasis
00:51:25.180 on it.
00:51:28.600 So I'm
00:51:29.340 going to go
00:51:29.660 with the
00:51:30.200 bigger emphasis.
00:51:31.860 But I also
00:51:32.540 like the fact
00:51:33.300 that he's not
00:51:34.680 white.
00:51:36.520 Because that
00:51:37.220 would just
00:51:37.500 help.
00:51:38.640 Because it's
00:51:39.260 going to turn,
00:51:39.860 everything turns
00:51:40.640 racist, right?
00:51:41.360 So if
00:51:43.060 white old
00:51:44.820 Trump is
00:51:45.720 attacking Mexico, 0.93
00:51:47.180 people are
00:51:48.740 going to call
00:51:49.080 me a racist.
00:51:50.820 You get that
00:51:51.700 right?
00:51:52.900 If Trump
00:51:53.740 were president,
00:51:54.900 and I
00:51:55.280 supported him
00:51:55.900 because of
00:51:56.520 fentanyl
00:51:57.240 specifically,
00:51:58.320 and then he
00:51:59.100 attacked Mexico,
00:52:00.360 it would be
00:52:01.080 this white guy
00:52:02.280 attacking brown 0.96
00:52:03.260 Mexicans,
00:52:04.160 and I support
00:52:05.000 him, therefore
00:52:05.440 I'm a racist.
00:52:06.580 Am I right?
00:52:07.100 But if
00:52:09.260 Vivek,
00:52:11.080 Ramaswamy,
00:52:12.900 if he's
00:52:13.400 president and
00:52:14.100 he attacks
00:52:14.580 Mexico,
00:52:15.460 that all
00:52:15.980 goes away.
00:52:18.000 So from
00:52:18.760 my personal
00:52:19.800 selfish interest,
00:52:21.400 I'd rather
00:52:21.880 have a brown
00:52:22.720 president attacking
00:52:23.720 a brown
00:52:24.140 country.
00:52:25.800 It's a better
00:52:26.660 look, and he
00:52:27.600 seems pretty
00:52:28.020 serious about
00:52:28.660 it.
00:52:29.740 So I like
00:52:30.660 that.
00:52:34.600 Oh,
00:52:35.260 Vivek,
00:52:35.760 I'm pronouncing
00:52:36.540 his name
00:52:36.900 wrong.
00:52:37.400 Really?
00:52:38.660 It's Vivek?
00:52:41.600 How did
00:52:42.160 you let me
00:52:42.520 go this far
00:52:43.040 without correcting
00:52:44.260 me until now?
00:52:45.060 You probably
00:52:45.400 did, and I
00:52:45.880 didn't see it.
00:52:46.700 Is that
00:52:47.020 correct?
00:52:47.420 It's Vivek,
00:52:48.480 not Vivek.
00:52:50.500 I've been
00:52:50.980 saying it
00:52:51.320 wrong the
00:52:51.620 whole time?
00:52:53.380 I'm not
00:52:53.900 sure you're
00:52:54.320 right.
00:52:56.640 I guess I'll
00:52:57.300 have to go
00:52:57.600 listen to it.
00:52:59.280 Vivek?
00:53:00.020 No.
00:53:01.600 He's probably
00:53:02.280 used to it
00:53:02.900 being pronounced
00:53:03.480 anyway.
00:53:05.460 If you had a
00:53:06.260 name that
00:53:06.620 people couldn't
00:53:07.160 pronounce,
00:53:07.840 wouldn't you
00:53:08.140 just sort of
00:53:08.800 get over it
00:53:09.300 after a while
00:53:09.820 and just
00:53:10.700 give up?
00:53:11.340 Okay,
00:53:11.780 whatever.
00:53:12.400 I'll be
00:53:12.720 whatever you
00:53:13.120 want me to
00:53:13.600 be.
00:53:16.200 All right,
00:53:16.660 well,
00:53:17.280 Harvey Weinstein
00:53:19.840 was sentenced
00:53:20.660 to 16 years
00:53:21.620 in prison
00:53:22.040 today,
00:53:23.400 guilty on
00:53:24.160 three counts
00:53:24.640 of sexual
00:53:25.140 assault.
00:53:26.380 And here's
00:53:26.760 the strangest
00:53:27.320 part of this
00:53:27.800 story.
00:53:30.200 Oh,
00:53:30.400 is somebody
00:53:30.660 saying that
00:53:31.180 Vivek is
00:53:31.920 correct?
00:53:33.160 All right,
00:53:33.500 well,
00:53:33.840 we'll find
00:53:34.180 out.
00:53:36.700 The strangest
00:53:37.560 thing about
00:53:37.900 this Harvey
00:53:38.360 Weinstein
00:53:38.840 being sentenced
00:53:39.560 to prison
00:53:40.120 is,
00:53:40.620 I thought
00:53:41.020 this happened
00:53:41.520 a long time
00:53:42.100 ago.
00:53:43.520 Was he only
00:53:44.320 awaiting trial?
00:53:46.720 Or was he
00:53:47.520 already convicted
00:53:48.240 and then they
00:53:48.860 just added some
00:53:49.580 new stuff?
00:53:52.280 Oh,
00:53:52.560 multiple trials.
00:53:53.340 So he was
00:53:53.720 already in jail,
00:53:54.560 right?
00:53:54.780 Didn't make
00:53:55.140 any difference.
00:53:56.580 We're just
00:53:57.080 adding some
00:53:57.680 to it.
00:53:59.640 All right.
00:54:02.200 All right.
00:54:04.460 That,
00:54:05.080 ladies and 0.98
00:54:05.460 gentlemen,
00:54:06.840 is my
00:54:09.720 prepared
00:54:10.160 presentation.
00:54:11.540 I will now
00:54:12.420 entertain your
00:54:13.400 questions.
00:54:14.880 Does anybody
00:54:15.180 have any
00:54:15.720 questions?
00:54:17.380 By the way,
00:54:18.580 how many of
00:54:19.400 you came here
00:54:20.340 to watch
00:54:22.680 me get
00:54:23.040 canceled and
00:54:24.720 were surprised?
00:54:27.680 Are you
00:54:30.500 a racist,
00:54:31.160 Scott?
00:54:31.420 I accept
00:54:32.200 that everybody's
00:54:32.980 a racist.
00:54:34.260 I think it's
00:54:34.880 ridiculous to
00:54:35.780 act like some
00:54:36.640 people don't
00:54:37.920 think in
00:54:38.440 racial terms.
00:54:40.020 People think
00:54:40.480 in different
00:54:40.900 racial terms,
00:54:42.360 but the
00:54:43.540 news has
00:54:44.600 programmed us
00:54:45.280 all to be
00:54:45.680 racists.
00:54:46.780 So I think
00:54:47.160 you should
00:54:47.420 just all
00:54:47.800 embrace it
00:54:48.320 at this
00:54:48.600 point.
00:54:49.760 Racism is
00:54:50.800 like multimedia.
00:54:53.780 Are you
00:54:54.140 old enough
00:54:54.540 to remember
00:54:55.000 when new
00:54:55.720 computers,
00:54:56.880 they were
00:54:57.200 usually PCs
00:54:58.220 pre-Windows.
00:55:00.960 When they
00:55:01.700 first were
00:55:02.340 able to
00:55:02.780 do video
00:55:03.580 and sound,
00:55:05.480 they were
00:55:05.800 sold as
00:55:06.280 multimedia
00:55:07.000 computers.
00:55:09.180 But now
00:55:09.920 we don't
00:55:10.240 say it's
00:55:10.680 a multimedia
00:55:11.340 computer because
00:55:12.300 every computer
00:55:13.360 is multimedia.
00:55:14.900 And it's
00:55:15.600 like the
00:55:15.880 racist stuff.
00:55:16.980 If you're
00:55:17.680 calling one
00:55:18.300 person a
00:55:18.860 racist, 0.77
00:55:20.240 that's sort
00:55:20.780 of like
00:55:21.260 slicing it a
00:55:23.580 little too
00:55:23.920 little.
00:55:24.940 Everybody's a 0.59
00:55:25.560 racist at
00:55:26.080 this point.
00:55:26.900 Because
00:55:27.140 everybody
00:55:27.460 thinks in
00:55:27.940 racial terms.
00:55:30.700 If you
00:55:31.040 treated
00:55:31.360 everybody as
00:55:32.000 an individual,
00:55:33.520 then you
00:55:33.980 would not
00:55:34.320 be a
00:55:34.620 racist.
00:55:35.780 But if
00:55:36.500 you ever
00:55:36.960 talk about
00:55:37.580 black
00:55:37.940 Americans,
00:55:38.680 or you
00:55:39.080 ever talk
00:55:39.680 about white
00:55:40.100 Americans as
00:55:40.860 a group,
00:55:41.660 you are a
00:55:42.500 racist.
00:55:44.100 As soon as
00:55:44.960 you talk
00:55:45.260 about them
00:55:45.640 as a group,
00:55:46.700 you are a
00:55:47.680 racist.
00:55:48.620 That's what
00:55:49.280 it is,
00:55:49.820 by definition.
00:55:51.700 If you
00:55:52.320 could ignore
00:55:52.760 that and
00:55:53.720 treat everybody
00:55:54.220 as an
00:55:54.560 individual,
00:55:56.060 well,
00:55:56.300 then you
00:55:56.520 would not
00:55:56.800 be.
00:55:57.600 But we
00:55:58.200 live in a
00:55:58.660 system in
00:55:59.220 which you're
00:55:59.680 forced to
00:56:00.640 think in
00:56:01.060 those terms
00:56:01.700 because that's
00:56:03.080 how stuff is
00:56:03.640 coming at
00:56:04.120 you.
00:56:04.820 You have to
00:56:05.240 at least deal
00:56:05.760 with what's
00:56:06.160 coming at
00:56:06.620 you.
00:56:07.740 And
00:56:08.100 affirmative
00:56:09.040 action is
00:56:09.700 something that
00:56:10.100 comes at
00:56:10.520 you.
00:56:12.540 It's not
00:56:13.120 your fault,
00:56:13.640 it just
00:56:13.880 came at
00:56:14.260 you.
00:56:19.000 Snickers is
00:56:19.620 doing great.
00:56:21.760 He's old
00:56:22.580 and tired
00:56:23.020 but she's 0.97
00:56:24.540 much better
00:56:24.980 to use as
00:56:25.520 a pillow
00:56:25.840 when I
00:56:26.180 try to
00:56:26.420 get her 0.89
00:56:26.660 to sleep.
00:56:29.080 If I
00:56:29.600 wake up
00:56:29.980 at 2.30
00:56:30.700 in the
00:56:30.920 morning,
00:56:31.220 as I
00:56:31.640 always do,
00:56:32.480 and I
00:56:32.780 have to
00:56:33.040 decide
00:56:33.340 whether to
00:56:33.760 get up
00:56:34.040 for the
00:56:34.300 day or
00:56:34.600 not,
00:56:35.400 if I
00:56:35.720 don't want
00:56:36.080 to get
00:56:36.240 up for
00:56:36.460 the day,
00:56:37.260 I'll go
00:56:37.680 get a
00:56:37.940 Snickers,
00:56:38.980 and she's
00:56:39.660 always sleepy
00:56:40.180 at night,
00:56:41.240 so she
00:56:41.780 doesn't move
00:56:42.400 around too
00:56:42.820 much,
00:56:43.340 and I'll
00:56:43.800 take her
00:56:44.360 to my
00:56:44.640 bed,
00:56:45.460 and I'll
00:56:45.920 use her 0.82
00:56:46.220 as a
00:56:46.480 pillow,
00:56:47.640 not on
00:56:48.200 top of
00:56:48.560 her,
00:56:48.880 like on
00:56:49.420 side,
00:56:50.720 and her
00:56:52.400 calmness
00:56:54.060 puts me
00:56:55.780 to sleep,
00:56:57.200 because she's
00:56:58.180 sort of warm
00:56:58.680 and fuzzy,
00:56:59.380 and she's
00:56:59.940 happy because
00:57:00.400 she's sleeping,
00:57:01.460 and I pick
00:57:02.900 up her vibe,
00:57:04.540 so I'm
00:57:05.180 kind of using
00:57:05.700 the effect
00:57:06.740 where every
00:57:08.020 once in a
00:57:08.280 while if I
00:57:08.720 drop something
00:57:09.520 on my foot
00:57:10.120 at home,
00:57:10.700 if I yell,
00:57:11.860 the dog will
00:57:12.520 be so upset
00:57:13.360 that I'm
00:57:14.620 upset,
00:57:15.720 that she
00:57:16.020 has to go
00:57:16.580 hide in the
00:57:17.040 backyard,
00:57:17.440 so she's
00:57:19.000 so connected
00:57:19.540 to me
00:57:19.860 emotionally
00:57:20.360 that when
00:57:21.620 I get
00:57:22.040 upset,
00:57:22.520 she gets
00:57:22.840 upset,
00:57:23.360 if I'm
00:57:23.680 happy,
00:57:24.020 she's
00:57:24.240 happy,
00:57:24.780 so basically
00:57:25.300 my mood
00:57:25.860 affects her
00:57:26.380 mood
00:57:26.740 completely,
00:57:27.920 but it
00:57:28.240 works the
00:57:28.540 other way
00:57:28.860 as well,
00:57:29.840 so when
00:57:30.420 she's so
00:57:30.820 sleepy that
00:57:31.440 she just 0.65
00:57:31.760 wants to
00:57:32.200 snore,
00:57:33.920 I just
00:57:34.260 put her 0.96
00:57:34.540 up to
00:57:34.780 my ear
00:57:35.200 and just
00:57:36.920 relax,
00:57:38.080 and I
00:57:38.400 can actually
00:57:38.780 feel her
00:57:39.800 emotional
00:57:41.720 state of
00:57:44.120 relaxation,
00:57:45.180 and it
00:57:45.400 just goes
00:57:45.720 right through
00:57:46.160 me,
00:57:46.420 it's so
00:57:47.380 immediate,
00:57:48.980 and then I
00:57:49.500 just fall
00:57:49.860 asleep,
00:57:51.860 so one
00:57:53.680 of the
00:57:53.880 most useful
00:57:54.920 things you
00:57:55.440 could ever
00:57:55.740 learn about
00:57:56.280 how humans
00:57:57.140 are wired
00:57:57.720 is that
00:57:58.640 we're wired
00:57:59.200 bi-directionally,
00:58:01.360 that I
00:58:03.420 affect my
00:58:03.980 dog's
00:58:04.340 feelings,
00:58:04.860 but of
00:58:05.100 course she
00:58:05.420 affects
00:58:05.680 mine,
00:58:06.920 if you're
00:58:07.920 happy you
00:58:08.360 smile,
00:58:08.940 but if you
00:58:09.420 smile more
00:58:09.980 you become
00:58:10.440 happy,
00:58:11.220 if you're
00:58:12.060 successful
00:58:12.640 you feel
00:58:13.480 whole,
00:58:15.140 but if
00:58:16.280 you're
00:58:16.480 whole you
00:58:17.040 can make
00:58:17.700 yourself feel
00:58:18.200 successful,
00:58:19.020 like everything
00:58:19.460 works bi-directionally,
00:58:21.080 as soon as you
00:58:21.540 learn that
00:58:21.960 everything works
00:58:23.540 out better.
00:58:27.580 All right,
00:58:28.600 so what do you
00:58:29.400 think,
00:58:29.660 am I going to
00:58:30.080 get cancelled?
00:58:33.180 Cancelled?
00:58:37.400 See,
00:58:38.220 here's what's
00:58:38.900 interesting about
00:58:39.560 this situation,
00:58:40.300 anybody who
00:58:43.700 knows my
00:58:44.140 actual
00:58:44.620 opinion,
00:58:45.420 the full
00:58:46.240 opinion that
00:58:46.800 you're hearing
00:58:47.140 right now,
00:58:47.900 anybody who
00:58:48.480 hears my
00:58:48.780 actual opinion
00:58:49.560 doesn't want
00:58:50.140 to give
00:58:50.360 them more
00:58:50.640 attention,
00:58:51.500 so it's
00:58:52.840 going to be
00:58:53.340 sort of a
00:58:54.620 dicey
00:58:56.220 situation if
00:58:56.980 they cancel
00:58:57.440 me,
00:58:58.080 because you
00:58:58.400 don't want
00:58:58.820 to give
00:58:59.020 me more
00:58:59.360 attention,
00:59:00.540 that's not
00:59:01.520 going to
00:59:01.720 work for
00:59:02.100 whatever you're
00:59:03.640 trying to
00:59:04.060 achieve,
00:59:05.360 but I
00:59:05.920 like it.
00:59:06.400 Is it
00:59:10.140 hard for
00:59:10.520 you to
00:59:10.760 believe that
00:59:11.260 I woke
00:59:11.620 up in a
00:59:11.980 good mood
00:59:12.360 and I
00:59:12.600 thought,
00:59:12.860 well,
00:59:12.960 today's
00:59:13.240 going to
00:59:13.400 be fun?
00:59:18.880 Yeah,
00:59:19.520 poking the
00:59:19.960 bear.
00:59:20.880 So,
00:59:22.160 Hotep,
00:59:22.780 Jesus' 0.89
00:59:23.440 take is
00:59:26.620 that I'm
00:59:27.260 trolling.
00:59:29.560 What do
00:59:30.060 you think?
00:59:31.520 Yes or
00:59:32.080 no?
00:59:33.040 Is this a
00:59:33.660 giant troll?
00:59:36.400 I'm just
00:59:40.760 looking at
00:59:41.120 your answers.
00:59:41.920 I'm seeing
00:59:42.260 yeses and
00:59:42.840 noes,
00:59:43.360 more noes 0.94
00:59:44.180 on locals.
00:59:46.680 I'm seeing
00:59:47.400 both,
00:59:48.360 I'm seeing
00:59:48.760 yes.
00:59:50.800 Well,
00:59:51.880 let me ask
00:59:52.700 you this
00:59:53.060 question.
00:59:54.920 What's the
00:59:55.540 difference?
00:59:57.840 What's the
00:59:58.440 difference?
00:59:58.740 What's the
00:59:59.740 difference?
01:00:00.820 tell us
01:00:07.200 what
01:00:07.420 Sneed
01:00:07.880 is.
01:00:08.260 I don't
01:00:08.420 know what
01:00:08.640 that is.
01:00:12.920 Are you
01:00:13.480 ever not
01:00:13.960 trolling?
01:00:14.980 Well,
01:00:15.420 I'll tell
01:00:15.660 you the
01:00:15.940 way I
01:00:16.440 think of
01:00:17.360 it.
01:00:18.180 I think
01:00:18.840 of it
01:00:19.100 more as
01:00:19.540 being
01:00:19.800 provocative,
01:00:21.400 which draws
01:00:21.960 energy
01:00:23.320 toward the
01:00:24.440 point.
01:00:24.680 Now,
01:00:26.780 if you
01:00:26.940 want to
01:00:27.140 call that
01:00:27.460 trolling,
01:00:28.500 because it
01:00:29.340 gets people
01:00:29.840 all excited
01:00:30.880 and you
01:00:31.480 know they'll
01:00:31.800 take it
01:00:32.140 out of
01:00:32.380 context,
01:00:33.500 and you
01:00:33.700 know they'll
01:00:34.100 look stupid, 0.55
01:00:35.480 well,
01:00:35.760 yeah,
01:00:35.980 it's that
01:00:36.300 too.
01:00:37.400 It's
01:00:37.840 definitely
01:00:38.120 that too.
01:00:40.140 Did I
01:00:40.720 know that
01:00:41.160 it would
01:00:41.420 surface
01:00:41.820 people acting
01:00:43.240 racist and
01:00:44.020 stupid?
01:00:45.060 Of course
01:00:45.480 I did.
01:00:46.360 Did I
01:00:46.700 think that
01:00:47.060 would be
01:00:47.340 fun?
01:00:47.940 Yeah,
01:00:48.680 yeah,
01:00:48.960 I did.
01:00:49.660 I thought
01:00:50.000 that would
01:00:50.240 be fun.
01:00:50.580 You
01:00:56.180 grifted
01:00:56.740 after,
01:00:57.160 oh,
01:00:57.420 let me
01:00:57.700 finish my
01:00:58.120 point.
01:00:58.680 So,
01:00:58.980 about the
01:00:59.420 Rasmussen
01:00:59.880 poll.
01:01:01.080 First
01:01:01.600 of all,
01:01:03.020 Rasmussen
01:01:03.480 does have
01:01:04.080 a good
01:01:04.320 reputation.
01:01:06.060 You
01:01:06.440 should
01:01:06.620 research
01:01:06.980 that.
01:01:07.780 But I
01:01:08.180 think their
01:01:08.720 presidential
01:01:09.540 polls are
01:01:10.300 among the
01:01:11.020 top.
01:01:11.900 You know,
01:01:12.120 they're in
01:01:12.340 the top,
01:01:12.840 I don't
01:01:13.040 know,
01:01:13.840 top quarter
01:01:14.540 or so
01:01:14.960 of polling.
01:01:16.080 And I
01:01:16.720 don't think
01:01:17.160 that anybody
01:01:17.920 has had a
01:01:19.360 super big
01:01:19.860 problem with
01:01:20.420 their
01:01:20.580 methodology.
01:01:23.300 So,
01:01:23.860 I mean,
01:01:24.140 compared to
01:01:24.840 polling in
01:01:25.500 general.
01:01:25.940 Because all
01:01:26.340 the pollsters
01:01:26.860 are having
01:01:27.260 some trouble
01:01:27.720 getting people
01:01:28.280 to be
01:01:29.380 honest.
01:01:30.840 But here's
01:01:31.500 my take.
01:01:32.400 Suppose it
01:01:33.000 was off
01:01:33.440 by,
01:01:34.280 I don't
01:01:35.580 know,
01:01:35.680 100%.
01:01:36.400 It doesn't
01:01:38.180 matter if
01:01:38.540 it's off
01:01:38.840 by 100%.
01:01:39.520 My point
01:01:40.040 would be
01:01:40.260 the same.
01:01:40.800 If 25% 0.52
01:01:41.760 of the
01:01:42.060 group,
01:01:42.660 you know,
01:01:43.520 has a
01:01:43.840 bad feeling
01:01:44.340 about you,
01:01:44.920 I'd feel
01:01:45.420 uncomfortable
01:01:45.900 around that
01:01:46.560 group.
01:01:47.860 As you
01:01:48.580 should,
01:01:49.420 as any
01:01:50.020 normal
01:01:50.340 person
01:01:50.700 would.
01:01:51.500 So it
01:01:52.000 wouldn't
01:01:52.160 matter if
01:01:52.680 it's way
01:01:53.100 off.
01:01:54.240 It's so
01:01:55.020 striking that
01:01:57.140 it could be
01:01:57.680 half that
01:01:58.300 degree and
01:01:58.960 it would
01:01:59.120 still mean
01:01:59.500 the same
01:01:59.820 thing.
01:02:02.700 And even
01:02:03.460 if people
01:02:03.920 were answering
01:02:05.780 that, you
01:02:07.080 know, not
01:02:07.420 for themselves
01:02:08.000 that they
01:02:08.360 were answering
01:02:08.700 for the
01:02:09.060 system,
01:02:09.760 if the
01:02:10.460 system says
01:02:11.160 that,
01:02:11.540 it's still
01:02:12.760 kind of the
01:02:13.240 same.
01:02:19.200 Scott
01:02:19.640 Wilson fell
01:02:20.600 for the
01:02:21.020 4chan hoax
01:02:23.200 about me.
01:02:24.760 Did you
01:02:25.200 also fall
01:02:25.980 for my
01:02:26.960 husband
01:02:28.180 apology?
01:02:30.380 You got
01:02:31.000 double
01:02:31.320 hoaxed.
01:02:31.980 A lot
01:02:32.260 of people
01:02:32.500 got double
01:02:33.040 hoaxed on
01:02:33.660 that.
01:02:35.200 But they
01:02:35.760 don't know
01:02:36.100 it yet,
01:02:36.460 so it's
01:02:36.700 funny.
01:02:36.920 Lend you
01:02:40.540 a million.
01:02:41.220 You don't
01:02:41.500 have to say
01:02:41.900 that too
01:02:42.240 many times.
01:02:43.480 I think I'm
01:02:44.040 going to
01:02:44.120 make you
01:02:44.420 go away
01:02:44.900 because you're
01:02:45.440 just saying
01:02:45.760 the same
01:02:46.060 comment over
01:02:46.700 and over.
01:02:48.180 You are
01:02:48.700 now hidden
01:02:49.120 on this
01:02:49.520 channel for
01:02:51.440 being repetitive.
01:02:55.100 All right.
01:03:03.560 Scott,
01:03:04.180 don't hide
01:03:04.920 this comment.
01:03:06.920 I will
01:03:10.480 hide that
01:03:10.860 comment.
01:03:12.400 I'll hide
01:03:12.800 the whole
01:03:13.060 user.
01:03:16.400 Yes,
01:03:16.920 I am
01:03:17.200 mocking all
01:03:18.020 racists,
01:03:18.840 but I'm
01:03:19.380 also saying
01:03:19.880 that everybody
01:03:20.360 is one.
01:03:25.640 Where would
01:03:26.280 you go?
01:03:26.820 To the
01:03:27.120 mountains?
01:03:28.360 No.
01:03:30.280 No,
01:03:30.900 the idea
01:03:31.740 is not
01:03:32.720 to avoid
01:03:33.660 all
01:03:34.000 individuals.
01:03:34.600 individuals.
01:03:36.480 So I
01:03:37.280 think some
01:03:37.720 people also
01:03:38.460 assumed that
01:03:40.080 I meant
01:03:40.500 avoid all
01:03:41.340 individuals.
01:03:42.880 No.
01:03:43.660 No,
01:03:44.000 I would
01:03:44.200 never say
01:03:44.560 that.
01:03:45.600 All
01:03:45.900 individuals
01:03:46.380 should be
01:03:46.840 treated as
01:03:47.440 fully
01:03:47.980 respected
01:03:48.580 humans
01:03:49.740 with no
01:03:51.240 exceptions.
01:03:53.580 So of
01:03:54.260 course I'm
01:03:54.840 going to be
01:03:55.320 just the
01:03:56.260 same as I
01:03:56.720 am in
01:03:57.140 person to
01:03:57.700 everybody.
01:03:58.560 Like,
01:03:58.880 that doesn't
01:03:59.260 change.
01:04:09.860 The
01:04:10.220 difference
01:04:10.540 between
01:04:10.880 racist and
01:04:11.600 biased,
01:04:12.080 I don't
01:04:12.320 know.
01:04:12.640 I don't
01:04:12.860 know if
01:04:13.080 that's a
01:04:13.620 useful
01:04:14.540 distinction
01:04:15.060 or not.
01:04:15.880 Is it?
01:04:17.860 Book update?
01:04:18.860 Oh,
01:04:19.020 I've got to
01:04:19.380 do some
01:04:19.700 more edits
01:04:20.120 in the next
01:04:20.500 couple weeks
01:04:21.060 and then
01:04:21.860 most of
01:04:23.600 my work
01:04:23.940 will be
01:04:24.180 done for
01:04:24.580 my book.
01:04:27.620 All
01:04:28.060 right.
01:04:33.000 Yeah,
01:04:33.580 I didn't
01:04:33.880 get a
01:04:34.120 blizzard in
01:04:35.040 Northern
01:04:35.300 California.
01:04:36.080 It's just
01:04:36.300 raining.
01:04:38.920 All
01:04:39.320 right,
01:04:39.460 well,
01:04:39.660 I was
01:04:39.920 really
01:04:40.140 expecting a
01:04:40.780 lot more
01:04:41.280 action this
01:04:42.960 morning.
01:04:44.380 But it
01:04:44.980 turns out
01:04:45.400 that when I
01:04:45.860 tell you my
01:04:46.320 actual opinion,
01:04:47.200 nobody has a
01:04:47.680 problem with
01:04:48.200 it.
01:04:49.400 Let me
01:04:49.900 ask,
01:04:50.180 does anybody
01:04:50.900 have a
01:04:51.280 problem with
01:04:51.820 my actual
01:04:52.480 opinion as
01:04:53.880 it was
01:04:54.280 described this
01:04:55.060 morning?
01:04:56.460 Anybody?
01:05:00.060 No.
01:05:02.060 But you
01:05:03.140 realize there's
01:05:03.620 going to be a
01:05:04.040 whole other
01:05:05.100 world that
01:05:06.360 didn't hear the
01:05:07.020 full context.
01:05:08.700 And everybody
01:05:09.100 who didn't
01:05:09.520 hear the full
01:05:10.380 context will
01:05:11.660 use me as
01:05:12.580 a political
01:05:13.180 football.
01:05:14.980 So,
01:05:16.000 now,
01:05:16.460 how much of
01:05:17.140 this do you
01:05:17.560 think is just
01:05:18.260 trying to
01:05:18.620 cancel me for
01:05:19.320 being a
01:05:19.940 presumed
01:05:21.900 Trump supporter?
01:05:24.460 How much
01:05:24.820 do you think
01:05:25.480 that the
01:05:25.820 Daily Beast
01:05:26.480 would have
01:05:27.520 run the
01:05:27.840 article about
01:05:28.720 me except
01:05:29.460 that it
01:05:29.880 hurts Trump?
01:05:32.440 I think it's
01:05:33.200 just the way
01:05:33.520 they hurt
01:05:33.740 Trump.
01:05:35.800 I think
01:05:36.040 that's their
01:05:36.420 price.
01:05:36.700 And getting
01:05:37.060 clicks,
01:05:37.620 that's about
01:05:38.000 all they
01:05:38.240 care about.
01:05:39.540 Anyway,
01:05:40.160 but if you
01:05:40.560 see something
01:05:41.000 in the
01:05:41.320 Daily Beast
01:05:41.940 that looks
01:05:42.940 like,
01:05:43.460 my God,
01:05:44.460 how could
01:05:44.920 anybody have
01:05:45.440 that opinion?
01:05:46.080 It's probably
01:05:46.480 because they
01:05:47.000 don't,
01:05:47.960 or you
01:05:48.240 haven't heard
01:05:48.540 of the
01:05:48.700 context.
01:05:50.980 You're going
01:05:51.560 back on your
01:05:52.160 word about
01:05:52.640 Trump?
01:05:53.460 No,
01:05:53.720 I'm not.
01:05:55.060 No,
01:05:55.360 I've always
01:05:55.740 said that
01:05:56.300 all of my
01:05:57.840 endorsements
01:05:58.440 for this
01:05:59.120 time around,
01:06:00.680 any endorsement
01:06:01.580 I make is
01:06:02.080 going to be
01:06:02.320 on one
01:06:02.740 topic,
01:06:03.700 and then I'll
01:06:04.320 change it in
01:06:04.960 a heartbeat
01:06:05.320 to the next
01:06:07.140 person who has
01:06:07.680 a better take
01:06:08.180 on it.
01:06:08.520 So Vivek's
01:06:10.000 current endorsement
01:06:11.660 is temporary.
01:06:12.920 If somebody
01:06:13.580 has a stronger
01:06:14.220 take,
01:06:14.800 or even
01:06:15.220 just a
01:06:15.540 better take,
01:06:16.900 then I
01:06:17.300 will switch
01:06:18.040 my allegiance
01:06:19.380 immediately.
01:06:20.260 I don't have
01:06:20.720 any allegiance
01:06:21.320 this time.
01:06:22.480 I'm a single
01:06:23.080 topic voter.
01:06:26.940 All right.
01:06:29.560 So I guess
01:06:30.280 that's it for
01:06:30.760 this,
01:06:31.120 and I will
01:06:31.780 go do some
01:06:32.420 other stuff.
01:06:32.920 I'm going
01:06:33.080 to talk to
01:06:33.480 the locals
01:06:34.060 people separately.
01:06:35.400 Thanks for
01:06:35.880 joining YouTube.
01:06:36.840 I know you
01:06:39.700 wanted more
01:06:40.180 of a fight
01:06:40.660 on this,
01:06:41.200 but bye
01:06:43.740 for now.