Episode 2035 Scott Adams: ESG, FBI And J6, And How My Plan Is Going So Far
Episode Stats
Length
1 hour and 25 minutes
Words per Minute
148.85086
Summary
Scott Adams talks about the use of subtitles on TV and movies, and why they don t make sense anymore. He also talks about Germany's plan to replace its last 3 nuclear plants with coal, and whether or not that's a good or bad thing.
Transcript
00:00:03.600
And if you'd like to be on time and experience the highlight of civilization, it's called
00:00:10.160
All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass or a tank or a chalice or a tine, a canteen,
00:00:13.520
a jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind, fill it with your favorite liquid, I like coffee.
00:00:19.640
And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, it's the dope bean hit of the day, the thing
00:00:43.120
Well let's talk about the minor stories and then toward the end I might say some more about
00:00:53.960
All right, I saw a tweet from Mike Sertovich who was asking why young people seem to watch
00:00:59.920
TV with the, what do you call it, the subtitles on?
00:01:05.160
Have any of you noticed that, that the use of subtitles, even if you speak the same language?
00:01:15.160
And Mike asked, quite reasonably, like what changed?
00:01:23.120
And I have to say I've noticed it myself and I didn't know what it was about but I have
00:01:35.880
One hypothesis is that sometimes the young people want to keep their headphones in or
00:01:41.360
they want to turn the sound really low but just have something on and maybe check in once
00:01:47.640
There's a little bit of that but it's definitely not just people with earbuds in.
00:01:53.520
The other thing I think is that movies and TV shows are so insensitive to what their consumers
00:02:10.000
Allow me to give you a demonstration of a movie from the 40s.
00:02:24.280
Well, you better talk to the police department.
00:02:29.280
Now, let me give you an impression of every person trying to win an Academy Award in the
00:02:55.880
It's just that the movies have so disrespected their audiences that they literally don't even
00:03:08.340
Why should you be concerned about listening to the voices of the people?
00:03:13.240
Now, I think part of it is also that background noise has been elevated.
00:03:20.840
Like they can add some background noise, you know, some street sounds or whatever.
00:03:27.060
And between the two things, I will tell you that as far as I know, my hearing is fine.
00:03:42.720
And if it's anything British at all, I don't have a chance.
00:03:53.560
Like I can watch an hour of a movie and not pick up a word at all.
00:03:58.120
And I think my hearing's fine as far as I know.
00:04:00.500
Anyway, the other possibility is that young people are used to seeing captions on Reels and TikToks.
00:04:13.760
But Germany, as Michael Schellenberger tweets, he says the Germans say they care deeply about climate change.
00:04:22.720
And yet Chancellor Olaf Scholz is proceeding with plans to replace Germany's last three nuclear plants with coal next month over the objections of his finance minister.
00:04:36.320
And then here's the final phrase that Schellenberger adds to his tweet.
00:04:49.020
The anti-nuclear people literally have no reason left.
00:05:00.440
You know, the ones who would know what they're talking about are all pro-nuclear.
00:05:11.560
You know, we know how to build nuclear sites that are either not going to melt down, the newer technology, or ones that have never melted down.
00:05:23.160
If you're going to build a nuclear plant today, you would build, you know, either a generation three that's never had a meltdown.
00:05:30.340
Or you'd build the newest generation, a four, that can't melt down.
00:05:36.500
And still, still, there's just nothing you can do to change minds.
00:05:43.300
You know, once people get something in their head, they just can't get it out.
00:05:51.040
So I want to make sure I'm not losing the context of this one.
00:05:55.420
It might be that they need to do something quick.
00:06:01.480
You know, maybe they'd need to fix something to keep those plants open.
00:06:11.860
You know, if we're looking at a climatic catastrophe, you could have, like, ten nuclear plants meltdown.
00:06:24.300
There have been zero meltdowns of the new kind of plant, if you were going to build one today.
00:06:31.280
And what does the left think is the risk of climate change?
00:06:41.780
The risk, according to the left, I don't buy this, but according to the left, the risk is total catastrophe.
00:06:47.620
Suppose everybody put in a bunch of nuclear power plants, and in some, you know, some period of years that isn't too much, ten of them melted down.
00:07:01.080
If ten of them melted down, unexpectedly, because the new technology has never melted down.
00:07:07.040
It's literally never happened with the new power plants.
00:07:12.960
If you were to compare it with any objective measure, you could have ten meltdowns and still save the world.
00:07:22.280
The meltdowns are going to affect a few people around it, and even they would get out of town.
00:07:27.700
You know, as soon as they got the alarm, they'd just be gone, probably.
00:07:30.580
So, you could have, if everything went wrong with nuclear, it would still save the world, according to the left.
00:07:39.480
Again, I don't buy into the disaster narrative, but they do.
00:07:45.460
And if they think the disaster's coming, they could have all kinds of nuclear disasters, which would be zero, actually.
00:07:54.000
Because, like I said, the technology that you would build one today is a technology that's never melted down.
00:08:04.300
And, like I said, the new plants won't melt down at all.
00:08:09.820
I'm going to throw out a theory, conspiracy theory option, maybe.
00:08:17.640
It's a conspiracy theory in the sense that I haven't heard anybody talk about it.
00:08:29.580
Suppose Putin doesn't believe he can win in Ukraine outright.
00:08:35.280
Or, what would be his option if he couldn't win?
00:08:38.220
And, let's say he's reasonable enough to not use nuclear.
00:08:41.560
I mean, he might threaten, but let's say he's not going to use it.
00:08:44.300
What would Putin do if he didn't want to lose exactly?
00:08:59.640
He would have to negotiate some kind of a deal.
00:09:03.420
Now, we don't know if the Ukrainians would negotiate anything.
00:09:13.040
If you were Putin, what would be the most dangerous thing you could do?
00:09:18.760
Negotiate peace and keep the Wagner Group intact.
00:09:24.220
Because the head of the Wagner Group doesn't seem as pro-Putin as you'd like him to be, you know, if you're Putin.
00:09:36.920
The most dangerous thing for Putin would be to end the war and let the head of the Wagner Group stay on the job.
00:09:45.440
Now, since you can't do much about that at the moment, because the head of the Wagner Group is the only one who's doing anything useful in the war.
00:09:57.600
You could order him to have his forces do really, really dangerous stuff until they're so degraded that you could negotiate for peace.
00:10:07.620
And then the Wagner Group would not be strong enough to defeat your loyalist forces.
00:10:13.880
If you tell me that the head of the Wagner Group is not actively thinking about taking over Russia itself, I think you're nuts.
00:10:30.600
Now, why do I say that about the head of the Wagner Group?
00:10:33.620
Who even does that kind of a thing unless they're power hungry and not afraid of anything?
00:10:39.600
If you're the head of the Wagner Group, you're not looking to be a wallflower.
00:10:50.360
Now, I think his job history is enough that this is not mind reading.
00:10:56.760
I think there's enough, you know, that's obvious about the situation.
00:11:01.920
That you could say that he's a person who wants power.
00:11:04.400
Because I think it's just true of everybody in his situation.
00:11:08.900
And he probably doesn't want to be Putin's bitch much longer.
00:11:12.820
And he might be in a position where he could just take it himself, just take over.
00:11:17.880
So I think Putin has to send him into harm and have the Wagner Group as degraded as possible before he talks peace.
00:11:28.880
He can get the peace and he won't get overthrown.
00:11:30.860
Now, is there anybody here who believes that's even possible?
00:11:53.800
And the reason I say it's possible is that it's probably what I would do.
00:11:57.860
If I were an evil dictator, I didn't care about anybody but myself,
00:12:01.900
I would make sure the Wagner Group was, you know, at least taken down by half before I ended the war.
00:12:12.440
So I just assumed Putin would do what I would do because it seems smart.
00:12:23.500
But don't you think it's worth being in the mix?
00:12:27.820
Don't you think it's at least feasible enough that it should be in the conversation?
00:12:35.720
Apparently, Congress just turned down some ESG promoting thing for your 401ks.
00:12:44.820
I guess whoever managed your 401ks would have to have an ESG plan in order to be able to do that.
00:12:52.280
I don't know if that's just for government pensions or what that was.
00:13:01.380
So there were enough Democrats to join the Republicans to turn down an ESG promoting bill in Congress.
00:13:12.960
Now, that's not the good news yet, meaning that it might not be good news,
00:13:21.320
So he's vetoing an affirmative action to get rid of ESG.
00:13:29.500
So he's vetoing the getting rid of ESG, which would keep ESG in this context.
00:13:35.160
Now, just the fact that Congress as a whole turned it down,
00:13:41.260
you know, it didn't take too many Democrat votes to...
00:13:53.480
So the balance in the Senate is kind of wacky at the moment.
00:13:57.660
Is there anybody else missing besides Fetterman?
00:14:07.260
So, and this is something that Vivek Ramaswamy said about that ESG story.
00:14:22.820
Democrats are the ones who used to be skeptical of undue corporate influence on politics.
00:14:28.340
ESG is that on steroids, meaning undue corporate influence.
00:14:32.180
For a political party that loves to ritually bemoan threats to democracy,
00:14:37.180
it's funny that they teamed up with the likes of BlackRock to create the biggest one of all.
00:14:42.620
I feel like the problem here is that nobody can handle nuance or any kind of context or any kind of detail.
00:14:50.360
Because if you just say, ESG, equality, then, of course, you salute that.
00:15:03.920
But as soon as you get into the fact that BlackRock is promoting it and it's like putting an anchor on Fremont,
00:15:09.640
and it puts other people in charge of your business, it's crazy.
00:15:17.400
Yeah, but even equity is one of those words that people reflexively say yes to, yeah, equity,
00:15:23.140
without thinking through what that means or what it would take.
00:15:30.240
Rasmussen has a poll, and as you know, there's never been a Rasmussen poll that's ever gotten me in trouble.
00:15:43.320
But according to the polls, 61% of voters, American voters, believe it is likely
00:15:47.800
that undercover government agents helped provoke the Capitol riot.
00:15:54.820
So clearly that's picking up independents and also Democrats.
00:16:05.600
Because usually I would expect that more down like 40%, you know, where it just goes along party lines.
00:16:12.680
But 61% believe it is likely, you know, not that it's a fact, but likely that the undercover government agents
00:16:24.400
Now, 39% say it's very likely, so that's probably a long party lines sort of thing.
00:16:40.500
Now, the 18% is the one that's the closest to the 25%, so we're at least consistent in a directional sense.
00:16:50.960
I always tease that 25% of the people will answer every question wrong.
00:16:57.220
It doesn't matter what the question is, and it's not the same 25%,
00:16:59.500
but every poll question, 25% of the public will just have the most dumbass answer.
00:17:21.160
Now, I introduce this story by saying, you all know that I've been a big supporter of the trans community,
00:17:40.520
My own reaction is only about other people's reactions, right?
00:17:47.780
To kick off Women's History Month, and this is an important part of the story,
00:17:56.800
Women's History Month, the Hershey Company did an ad where they were honoring women,
00:18:04.000
and they featured, primarily, they featured a trans woman.
00:18:10.660
And that was their look for Women's History Month.
00:18:15.440
So it's sort of like honoring Rachel Dolan's for Black History Month.
00:18:27.980
Now, I remind you that if it sounds like I'm making fun of any trans people,
00:18:41.480
Like, people are really pissed, and especially women.
00:18:47.480
Biological, and people identify as women who were born that way,
00:18:55.060
they think their brand is being a little diminished
00:18:57.480
by having somebody who was born a biological male and transitioned to a woman.
00:19:12.320
Am I wrong that that's just funny, that they did that?
00:19:19.720
I'm not sure if it's going to sell more chocolate.
00:19:23.820
And they were on the right side of the social narrative at the moment.
00:19:35.680
What was the discussion in the boardroom or wherever they made this decision?
00:19:43.760
in which they walked through the corporate decision
00:19:47.920
of having a trans woman as the face of Women's History Month?
00:20:02.660
It's only about the decision process and how awkward it would be
00:20:08.500
Like, you can't not do it, and you can't do it.
00:20:14.080
So I'm guessing that there were probably some activists within the company
00:20:29.240
If people within the company came to you and said,
00:20:31.820
Hey, I think this is how we show we're progressive,
00:20:35.040
and we'd be really mad if you don't consider trans women women,
00:20:41.620
I think half of the country who wouldn't like this are not going to buy as much chocolate.
00:20:56.960
I think the internal pressure would be so high that they'd just have to do it.
00:21:10.160
and the conversation is deepened, and people are mad.
00:21:21.560
Remember I told you that I thought that a number of programs are backwards-looking,
00:21:33.700
and they're backwards-looking in the sense that they depend on a narrative
00:21:37.240
of white people being racist and continuing to support systemic racism.
00:21:45.140
So, in my opinion, a forward-looking philosophy would look like this.
00:21:55.140
Maybe some affirmations, maybe some manifesting.
00:22:02.660
You'd have systems, maybe even more than goals.
00:22:15.280
Reciprocity as an operating system is just a killer,
00:22:25.160
because you're doing something without any sense of reward.
00:22:29.140
You know, the reciprocity might come to you in the future,
00:22:33.100
so you're preparing for a future where you need that.
00:22:37.100
Now, let me give you some examples where that mattered.
00:22:42.920
Do you remember there was some, I don't know if it was a riot,
00:22:49.400
that caused some street in America to be all littered,
00:23:03.440
And so he just took his broom and just started sweeping,
00:23:22.020
And if you remember, he was deluged with money and offers.
00:23:37.180
They could see that he had a reciprocity operating system.
00:23:42.740
That he was just saying, this needs to be done.
00:23:48.440
Now, if you do that kind of stuff on a regular basis,
00:24:09.860
So, generally speaking, when you're looking forward
00:24:17.180
how important that is in my life at the moment.
00:24:38.420
because it turns out there are more black people
00:24:45.600
And that includes people who were not necessarily
00:24:56.460
a long history of being useful to other people,
00:25:53.040
Like, I thought I was just going to get yelled down
00:49:41.480
there's clearly racial tensions that have gotten
00:49:45.780
worse since Trayvon Martin, and I think they're
00:50:04.840
Like if we can't figure out how to work together
00:50:33.960
But I don't do things that aren't good for everybody.
00:50:38.960
You help the ones that are in the deepest hole,
00:50:56.680
and a number of people have said words to this effect,
00:51:24.880
Does anybody think I wasn't trying to outrage you?
00:51:48.520
Do you remember that I supported Colin Kaepernick's protest,
00:51:52.400
and everybody who's watching me now hated me for it?
00:51:57.920
And I supported his protest because it was perfect.
00:52:34.760
I would have liked to see him go back and play again,
00:52:49.220
then pissing you off is exactly what I wanted to do.
00:52:56.640
I thought it would just stay within my audience.