Real Coffee with Scott Adams - March 06, 2023


Episode 2039 Scott Adams： Media Manipulation Education Using Me As Your Example, Bail Reform & More


Episode Stats


Length

55 minutes

Words per minute

142.52242

Word count

7,948

Sentence count

617

Harmful content

Misogyny

3

sentences flagged

Hate speech

19

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Dilbert, the world s most well-known comic, is no longer a household name in the media. Why did this happen? And what does it mean for the future of the world as a whole? Scott Adams explains why.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Highlight of Civilization.
00:00:06.000 In answer to your question on YouTube, no, this is not an AA meeting.
00:00:11.000 You're in the wrong room.
00:00:13.000 But for the rest of you, if you've come to the Highlight of Civilization,
00:00:16.000 Coffee with Scott Adams, you want to take your experience up a notch,
00:00:20.000 and all you need for that is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or chalice or stye,
00:00:23.000 and a canteen, a jaguar flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:27.000 Fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:00:30.000 I like coffee.
00:00:31.000 Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.
00:00:34.000 It's the dopamine.
00:00:35.000 At the end of the day, the thing makes everything better.
00:00:37.000 It's called the Simultaneous Sip.
00:00:39.000 It happens now.
00:00:40.000 Go.
00:00:47.000 So good.
00:00:50.000 So, so good.
00:00:52.000 Well, if you are in the media and you'd like to say something about me that maybe I wouldn't like,
00:01:01.000 one of the factors that you have to consider is that I'm a professional cartoonist, still, still.
00:01:11.000 And probably at least some of you are going to get some pushback.
00:01:16.000 Now, if you don't know it, I do a second comic besides Dilber.
00:01:20.000 Dilber will continue, but it will be on the local's subscription site after March 13th.
00:01:26.000 But I also do a comic that appears there, and sometimes I tweet it, called Robots Read News.
00:01:32.000 And after watching Howard Kurtz on his Media Matters and his panelists talk about me,
00:01:39.000 and noticing that their main path into the story was through mind reading, I believe he regrets it.
00:01:49.000 I think he was intending this.
00:01:53.000 So, after watching the mind reading, I did this Robots Read News comic, which is always just the same robot just sitting at a desk.
00:02:02.000 I'll read it to you.
00:02:03.000 He never moves.
00:02:05.000 The robot says,
00:02:06.000 Media journalist Howard Kurtz wowed the audience of Fox News by reading the mind of Scott Adams from 2,000 miles away,
00:02:14.000 which reminds me of an old saying, quote,
00:02:18.000 Those who can't do journalism do media journalism.
00:02:22.000 Those who can't do media journalism start carnival acts.
00:02:27.000 So, I don't know.
00:02:30.000 Howard's probably having a fun day.
00:02:33.000 But in other comic news, you may have heard that I do a comic called Dilbert.
00:02:40.000 Some of you have heard of it.
00:02:43.000 And here was today's offering.
00:02:48.000 And by the way, keep in mind that this is the comic that's been canceled globally,
00:02:54.000 except for in my own subscription site after March 13th.
00:02:59.000 Or after March 12th, actually.
00:03:01.000 So, this is what they canceled, right?
00:03:03.000 So, it's Dilbert and Dogbert talking.
00:03:06.000 And Dogbert says, I don't know if I mentioned, I built a user interface to control the world.
00:03:12.000 I had to hide my ownership of it, so no large military power would know what I was up to.
00:03:19.000 And Dilbert says, what do you call this user interface?
00:03:22.000 And Dogbert says, TikTok.
00:03:24.000 Have you heard of it?
00:03:26.000 Now, one of the things that the Dilbert comic has done for 34 years
00:03:32.000 is surface things that the general public wasn't aware of, that they needed to be aware of.
00:03:39.000 Because it's one of those few bubble-penetrating things.
00:03:43.000 Because Dilbert is read by, you know, conservatives and liberals.
00:03:47.000 Or at least it used to be.
00:03:48.000 It used to be.
00:03:49.000 So, it used to be that anybody in an office read Dilbert.
00:03:52.000 It wasn't anything about politics.
00:03:54.000 So, there were things that I knew, if they were like a bubble, I knew I could penetrate the bubble.
00:04:01.000 For example, years ago when the year 2000 bug was a big concern, you know, when the year turned 2000,
00:04:09.000 people were concerned that the old computer programs wouldn't recognize the date and everything would break.
00:04:14.000 And I was writing Dilbert comics about that long before you needed to start getting programming.
00:04:24.000 So, there were probably a lot of businesses who learned that they need to do something about the year 2000 problem
00:04:31.000 because they read it in a Dilbert comic.
00:04:34.000 In fact, that very fact was in a court case where somebody was sued for not doing enough about Y2K.
00:04:41.000 And part of the evidence that they should have known better and they should have done something about the Y2K bug 1.00
00:04:47.000 was that it was in a Dilbert comic a year before.
00:04:50.000 And therefore, it's common knowledge because it's in a Dilbert comic.
00:04:54.000 So, that vehicle for benefiting the world has been shut off.
00:05:00.000 Did the world get what it wanted?
00:05:03.000 Is the world a little bit happier today because they don't have that benefit?
00:05:07.000 Well, if they stopped a monster like me from continuing, totally worth it.
00:05:14.000 All right.
00:05:16.000 Fox News is dunking on CNN, mostly Jeff Zucker when he was in charge, not so much the current leadership.
00:05:26.000 But they're reporting that in the early months of the pandemic, Jeff Zucker, who's the head of CNN,
00:05:31.000 would not allow his network to work on the lab leak theory because he thought it was, or even report on it or chase it down.
00:05:40.000 Because he thought it was a Trump talking point.
00:05:43.000 It's a Trump talking point.
00:05:45.000 The news.
00:05:47.000 He wouldn't report the news because it might be something that Trump agreed with.
00:05:52.000 Does that just blow your mind?
00:05:57.000 There are some stories that are so mind-boggling that you just sort of stare at them,
00:06:04.000 and you don't even know what your reaction should be.
00:06:07.000 Like you're just stunned into inaction and silence.
00:06:10.000 But we're going to talk about the media manipulations in general,
00:06:15.000 give you a little media education, and make it relevant to the headlines.
00:06:20.000 Number one, has anybody noticed that both CNN and Fox News, and probably most of the media,
00:06:27.000 is trying to ignore Trump, and he's making it harder and harder?
00:06:31.000 Have you noticed that?
00:06:34.000 And watching this tension is so hilarious.
00:06:38.000 All right.
00:06:39.000 So Trump gets an overwhelming majority of the straw poll as CPAC.
00:06:46.000 Now that wasn't surprising, because CPAC is a lot of people who are Trump supporters.
00:06:51.000 But he's far and away the most likely person to be the contender for the President of the United States.
00:06:59.000 And somehow they're treating him like it's not a story.
00:07:05.000 And watching the desperation, I mean, it's probably just my imagination, but I imagine desperation behind the headlines.
00:07:14.000 It's like, how much longer are we going to be able to not talk about him?
00:07:18.000 And when they do, they try to put it into the smallest box.
00:07:22.000 So today, CNN was reporting about all the many facts he got wrong in his speech.
00:07:30.000 So that's all they did. They just fact-checked him.
00:07:33.000 Now, the trouble is that that's still a tension.
00:07:39.000 He knows how to make it impossible to ignore him.
00:07:42.000 Just put in some hyperbole, some facts they're going to disagree with.
00:07:47.000 They just can't let it go. They can't let it go.
00:07:52.000 Now, do you know how Trump does a lot of his provocations?
00:07:58.000 I'll tell you.
00:08:00.000 He says things which he knows are kind of true.
00:08:04.000 True enough that people would say, oh yeah, that hits with me.
00:08:08.000 I see what you're saying.
00:08:09.000 But even with the stuff that's kind of true, he'll leave at least a little bit of suggestion, maybe a hint, maybe directly, of something that's totally not true.
00:08:22.000 And nobody can resist coming in and talking about the not true part.
00:08:28.000 So if they come in and they say, it's not true that if the windmills stop, your TV will go off.
00:08:35.000 That's my favorite one. He says it all the time.
00:08:39.000 My favorite one is that you can't watch TV if the wind isn't blowing.
00:08:48.000 Now, the beauty of it is the press has made such a caricature of him that they treat it like maybe he thinks it's true.
00:09:00.000 And you know he doesn't think it's true. He knows what a battery is.
00:09:05.000 He knows that the network doesn't go down when the wind stops blowing.
00:09:11.000 But the fact that it's so untrue and so obviously untrue, you can't stop talking about it.
00:09:16.000 And when you're done, the only thing you remember is windmills are not ideal.
00:09:21.000 So anyway, another way to do that, I'll just put this out there, another way to draw attention to your point would be to say something about black Americans.
00:09:36.000 And then let people imagine that you really meant every single one.
00:09:43.000 See the technique?
00:09:46.000 I say something that everybody agrees with, wow, seems like there's a trend toward anti-whiteness that's going to cause people to be less want to interact.
00:09:57.000 100% of the world agrees with that.
00:10:00.000 But then I say, instead of, there are some number of black people who are being poisoned by the narrative, which would be a more accurate, fair statement. 0.64
00:10:10.000 I say, black people, do you see the technique? 1.00
00:10:15.000 Do you think I knew that because I would get fact checked on that, because it's obviously not true.
00:10:21.000 It's obviously not true that all any group acts the same.
00:10:26.000 There's no group that all acts the same.
00:10:28.000 But if I allow you to imagine that's what I thought, which of course I don't, because nobody does.
00:10:35.000 But I imagine you to imagine, I allow you to imagine that maybe I do think that.
00:10:41.000 Maybe I do think that it's every single person in the group, which literally nobody believes.
00:10:47.000 But that brings all the energy.
00:10:49.000 Now, I brought a little bit too much energy, and that's on me.
00:10:54.000 But that's the same technique.
00:10:57.000 All right.
00:10:58.000 I'll give you a little media education, and I'll use myself as an example.
00:11:02.000 I talk about this one a lot when it's not involving me.
00:11:08.000 It's where the headline doesn't match the story.
00:11:12.000 Headline doesn't match the story.
00:11:14.000 Before I give you my explanation, would you say true or false?
00:11:18.000 True or false?
00:11:19.000 True or false?
00:11:20.000 True or false?
00:11:21.000 That the headlines about me were accurate or misleading compared to the details of the
00:11:26.000 story?
00:11:27.000 Accurate or misleading?
00:11:28.000 What do you think?
00:11:33.000 Now, how can it be misleading if they showed the video?
00:11:37.000 How could that be misleading?
00:11:39.000 There's the video.
00:11:40.000 Well, one way to be misleading is to show the video.
00:11:51.000 Almost everything that's not true had a video or a graph or an expert or a photograph.
00:11:58.000 Everything that's not true has some kind of visual evidence.
00:12:05.000 And everything that you believe, you believe because you saw something.
00:12:11.000 Right?
00:12:12.000 So let me give you an idea of how much context was left out of cartoonist goes on racist rant.
00:12:20.000 All right.
00:12:21.000 So the first media lesson is the headline is propaganda.
00:12:26.000 Just keep that in mind.
00:12:27.000 The headline is always propaganda.
00:12:29.000 Always.
00:12:30.000 It's always propaganda.
00:12:32.000 Because all news networks are leaning left or right.
00:12:35.000 Except maybe News Nation I'm talking to tonight with Chris Cuomo.
00:12:39.000 I think they're trying to actually be a non-aligned, which is hurting their ratings.
00:12:45.000 If they're trying to be fair, it's going to hurt their ratings.
00:12:48.000 Anyway, tonight, just a plug for that.
00:12:51.000 Tonight at 8pm Eastern Time, live on Chris Cuomo's show on News Nation.
00:12:58.000 If you don't know how to watch News Nation, just Google it.
00:13:02.000 You have to have it on your cable network.
00:13:05.000 That's the way to watch it.
00:13:07.000 You can watch it on their app as well, but only if you also have a password to your cable network.
00:13:13.000 So if you want to watch that.
00:13:14.000 This will be probably the best context that you'll see about the situation.
00:13:22.000 But not many people will see it, because it's a smaller outlet.
00:13:26.000 It's one of the reasons I'm picking it, because I didn't want to use the major news for this,
00:13:31.000 because they're disreputable.
00:13:35.000 I'm only trying to talk to people I trust, who might give me a good pushback, so that I have something to work with.
00:13:44.000 So I think that'll be fun. Check it out.
00:13:47.000 Anyway, about the titles not matching the story.
00:13:51.000 The story may or may not have the proper context, but the headlines are always just going to be propaganda.
00:13:57.000 How many of you who do not study the media know that that's the case?
00:14:03.000 That the headline is propaganda, but because they don't want to just completely make up news in an obvious way.
00:14:09.000 I mean, there might be errors there.
00:14:11.000 But there could be something somewhat factual, but then the headline is just propaganda, left or right.
00:14:17.000 It doesn't matter who you're talking about.
00:14:21.000 And so look at my headline.
00:14:26.000 So my headline, roughly speaking, was, I think you'd agree,
00:14:30.000 Dilbert cartoonist goes on racist rant.
00:14:33.000 Is that the headline you saw?
00:14:35.000 Sometimes tirade, but racist rant.
00:14:38.000 What would you assume is the story if you didn't know better?
00:14:43.000 And most people just read the headlines.
00:14:45.000 This morning, for example, I read 40 headlines, and I looked into five stories.
00:14:58.000 So the five stories I read, I might have had enough information to invalidate the headline.
00:15:04.000 Maybe not.
00:15:05.000 But the others, I just sort of looked at the headline and said, okay.
00:15:09.000 And now that became part of my memory.
00:15:11.000 How many of those headlines were accurate?
00:15:14.000 I don't know.
00:15:15.000 I didn't look into them.
00:15:17.000 But they sort of become part of your, you know, your framework.
00:15:21.000 Just sort of automatically, they just sort of sneak in.
00:15:24.000 It's just something you saw.
00:15:25.000 So let's take the statement, let's take the headline, Dilbert cartoonist goes on racist rant.
00:15:33.000 Now, if you take out the goes on part, which is not the important part, how many of those words are propaganda?
00:15:41.000 All of them.
00:15:42.000 All of them.
00:15:43.000 I'll tell you why.
00:15:45.000 First of all, Dilbert cartoonist.
00:15:48.000 Is Dilbert cartoonist the right context for this story?
00:15:53.000 No.
00:15:54.000 No, it's completely inaccurate.
00:15:56.000 If you believe that a Dilbert, just a cartoonist, if you believe that a cartoonist went on a racist rant, the logical conclusion, especially if you see the video.
00:16:07.000 If you see the video, you're going to say, oh, this person is talking outside his area cartooning, and he doesn't like black people.
00:16:17.000 That's what you would think.
00:16:19.000 But what else could you conclude from that headline?
00:16:22.000 Somebody left his area, left his domain, and doesn't like black people.
00:16:28.000 I can't imagine any other interpretation than that.
00:16:33.000 Now, let me tell you what happens if you don't use propaganda to tell the story.
00:16:39.000 The first thing you should know is that Dilbert cartoonist was the wrong frame.
00:16:44.000 It's not even the most important thing I do.
00:16:47.000 How many of you know that, that Dilbert is not in the top five of things I do?
00:16:54.000 Now, it's the thing that makes the most money, or used to.
00:16:58.000 Most of that's gone now.
00:17:00.000 But, yeah, so I'm, in recent years, I'm better known, or at least let's say I've had more impact, in the domains of persuasion, mostly group persuasion, but also individual, and the domain of personal success.
00:17:21.000 How many of you know I'm maybe the most influential author in the domain of personal success?
00:17:31.000 How many of you know that?
00:17:34.000 And did you know that when I was speaking about this topic, the topic of, it started with the Rasmussen poll, but that's not the important part.
00:17:44.000 How many of you thought I was talking as a cartoonist?
00:17:47.000 It was the wrong job.
00:17:48.000 I was talking as a hypnotist, I was talking as a persuader, and I was talking as a self-help, personal improvement author.
00:18:04.000 So if you put it in that context, it starts sounding a little different.
00:18:08.000 So the first context that's wrong is my job description.
00:18:11.000 If you understood it as a Dilbert guy, it doesn't make sense.
00:18:15.000 If you understand it as a hypnotist persuader who routinely uses hyperbole to attract attention, then you're starting to understand a little bit that the way you were told the story might have some missing context.
00:18:33.000 Right?
00:18:34.000 So, how many other things are missing in the context?
00:18:39.000 Well, a few.
00:18:41.000 Here are a few things.
00:18:44.000 Most of you have seen the news by now about me.
00:18:48.000 Ask yourself how much of this you saw.
00:18:51.000 But also ask, is it important to the story?
00:18:54.000 Right?
00:18:55.000 Basic questions.
00:18:57.000 Now, even if you believe, if you see something here, you say, I don't believe that's true.
00:19:02.000 Because, you know, everybody's a skeptic.
00:19:04.000 It's true as far as I know, everything here.
00:19:07.000 I'm pretty sure it's true.
00:19:08.000 But if you didn't believe it, even if you didn't believe it, would you agree that it's an important part of the story?
00:19:17.000 What I say were my intentions, even if you don't believe them.
00:19:23.000 Right?
00:19:24.000 Have you ever seen a story about, let's say, a mass killer?
00:19:28.000 What's the first thing we ask when you hear there's a mass shooting?
00:19:32.000 What's the first question?
00:19:34.000 Why?
00:19:35.000 Why?
00:19:36.000 Right?
00:19:37.000 The party affiliation is part of the question why.
00:19:41.000 Right?
00:19:42.000 The entire question is why.
00:19:44.000 How many people saw journalism about why I said what I did?
00:19:51.000 Did you see anybody talk about my motivation as I described it?
00:19:57.000 Isn't that the biggest part of the story?
00:20:00.000 Isn't the biggest part of the story why I did it?
00:20:03.000 That's actually missing from the story.
00:20:06.000 Did you notice?
00:20:08.000 How many of you noticed that the biggest part of the story wasn't even mentioned?
00:20:13.000 The biggest part is why I did it.
00:20:15.000 Am I wrong?
00:20:16.000 Let me just test the audience here.
00:20:18.000 Is that not the biggest question?
00:20:20.000 Would anybody disagree with the statement?
00:20:22.000 It's the biggest question.
00:20:24.000 And completely ignored.
00:20:26.000 Right?
00:20:27.000 How many of you noticed that the weakest take was to question me on the validity of the Rasmussen poll?
00:20:38.000 The Rasmussen poll was just my jumping off point.
00:20:42.000 Was there anybody who hasn't noticed that there's a trend toward anti-whiteness in the United States?
00:20:48.000 Is there anybody who hadn't noticed?
00:20:51.000 It's kind of noticeable, right?
00:20:53.000 How many of the stories cowardly said, let's talk about the quality of this one poll?
00:21:00.000 As if that was the point.
00:21:02.000 As if that were the important thing.
00:21:04.000 That is a cowardly approach to this story.
00:21:08.000 Those are people who wanted to talk about it because it's a big story.
00:21:11.000 They wanted to get their clicks, but they definitely didn't want to tell you about the story.
00:21:16.000 So instead, they found a little safe harbor.
00:21:19.000 Well, let's talk about the statistics.
00:21:21.000 Let's talk about the margin of error.
00:21:24.000 Which, by the way, if they talked about accurately, they would have found out that the margin of error,
00:21:29.000 even with the small numbers, only 8%.
00:21:32.000 Now, the bigger question is that the question itself was hinky, which I've always agreed with.
00:21:38.000 But the poll was never important to the story.
00:21:42.000 How many of you believed, when you saw the story, that I was fooled by a bad poll and based my opinion on the poll?
00:21:53.000 How many of you think that's correct?
00:21:56.000 Of course not.
00:21:57.000 Who in the world would do that?
00:21:59.000 So this is where you should apply the really filter?
00:22:02.000 Imagine that the only thing I saw was one poll and nothing else had been in my thinking.
00:22:09.000 Really?
00:22:10.000 Do you think I would have done anything I did if I saw one poll and it didn't agree with every observed reality?
00:22:17.000 If I didn't see every screaming signal pointing in the same direction, do you think the poll would have had any relevance?
00:22:24.000 No.
00:22:25.000 The poll is completely irrelevant to the point and completely irrelevant to my intention and completely irrelevant should be to you.
00:22:36.000 But the news, quite cowardly, used diversion.
00:22:40.000 Now, diversion is the next lesson.
00:22:43.000 When the news decides, oh, let's focus on this little thing, it's not because that thing's important.
00:22:50.000 Sometimes it is.
00:22:52.000 But often it's because they're ignoring and trying to get away from the real question.
00:22:57.000 That's what's happening.
00:22:59.000 If you didn't know that you're seeing a huge diversion, you're learning it now.
00:23:04.000 And it's a standard media practice.
00:23:06.000 Sometimes intentional, probably sometimes subconscious.
00:23:11.000 All right.
00:23:12.000 How many of you have seen this trick?
00:23:15.000 I'll go over the context in a second.
00:23:17.000 How many of you have seen this trick where the first part of the story will tell you the outrage
00:23:25.000 and then you get all worked up and you're like, ah, rah, because you saw the first part of the story?
00:23:29.000 And they don't give you the context until you've had to read all the way to the end.
00:23:34.000 How many times have you seen that?
00:23:36.000 Because I've called it down with my story here.
00:23:39.000 So that happened to me.
00:23:41.000 There were a number of outlets who reported some part of the story accurately.
00:23:46.000 And then they also showed some part of the context.
00:23:49.000 Except they showed it last.
00:23:52.000 They showed it last.
00:23:54.000 Imagine if this story had been told in the reverse order.
00:23:59.000 Context first.
00:24:00.000 Right?
00:24:01.000 This is what it would sound like.
00:24:05.000 Let's see.
00:24:06.000 I'll do my best headline.
00:24:12.000 Most influential self-help author says we should stay away from people who don't like us.
00:24:21.000 Or something like that.
00:24:24.000 Right?
00:24:25.000 If people don't like you, you should probably stay away.
00:24:28.000 Now, then it would go into the outrageous way that I said it.
00:24:35.000 But you would be primed to say, well, I agree with this point.
00:24:38.000 I just don't like the way you said it.
00:24:40.000 Now, here's the next point.
00:24:42.000 Those who say I should not have said it the way I said it.
00:24:45.000 Because it caused too much problems.
00:24:47.000 Did they ask my intention?
00:24:50.000 Was it my intention to cause no problems?
00:24:53.000 Well, if my intention had been to cause no problems,
00:24:57.000 then I did a bad job.
00:25:00.000 Why don't you ask my intention?
00:25:03.000 My intention was to cause a problem.
00:25:05.000 To draw energy to the topic.
00:25:09.000 And then maybe do something useful.
00:25:12.000 If you look at it in the context of self-improvement,
00:25:16.000 and my biggest topic is reframing.
00:25:20.000 I'm trying to reframe the race conversation 0.92
00:25:24.000 from completely destructive, what it is now.
00:25:27.000 It's completely destructive.
00:25:29.000 There's nothing good about the way we talk about race right now.
00:25:32.000 It's all just, you know, what do you call it?
00:25:35.000 A win-lose proposition?
00:25:38.000 Who's winning and who's losing?
00:25:40.000 So unproductive.
00:25:42.000 I'm trying to change the frame to personal growth and success.
00:25:47.000 Because if you learn the tools of personal success,
00:25:50.000 you can kind of slice through systemic racism,
00:25:53.000 even while it still exists.
00:25:55.000 You would just be immune to it if you had enough.
00:25:58.000 If you had the right talent stack and you had the right, let's say,
00:26:02.000 systems and the right technique for success.
00:26:06.000 So if you learn a technique for success,
00:26:09.000 which is my entire thrust,
00:26:12.000 then you're not going to be having problems.
00:26:16.000 Now, here's the other media trick.
00:26:20.000 If I said to you, and I've showed you this one before,
00:26:25.000 if I said to you, black people like hip-hop music, 0.99
00:26:31.000 would you say that's racist?
00:26:34.000 Or would you say, oh, I know you don't mean every single black person?
00:26:38.000 Obviously.
00:26:39.000 Obviously you don't mean every black person.
00:26:42.000 Right?
00:26:43.000 And you would understand that completely.
00:26:46.000 We wouldn't be having an argument.
00:26:48.000 If I said white people like cheese, 0.77
00:26:52.000 you wouldn't say, hold on, Scott, that's so wrong.
00:26:55.000 Because there are white people who are lactose intolerant
00:26:58.000 and they can't eat that cheese.
00:26:59.000 And there are some people who just don't like the smell of cheese.
00:27:02.000 So you're so racist because you say white people like cheese.
00:27:06.000 To which I say, only the media and trolls would have that interpretation.
00:27:12.000 Anything you say about a group never means all of them.
00:27:18.000 Like, never?
00:27:20.000 Like, never.
00:27:22.000 If the first assumption you made was he means all of them,
00:27:26.000 like all black Americans or all white Americans or all of anybody,
00:27:30.000 is that really a good analysis?
00:27:32.000 Now, individuals in the audience will fall for that.
00:27:37.000 But the media...
00:27:39.000 Who in the media...
00:27:41.000 You saw the coverage about my story.
00:27:43.000 Ask yourself this.
00:27:45.000 Who in the media said this?
00:27:47.000 Obviously he doesn't mean all black people.
00:27:50.000 Who told you that?
00:27:53.000 And do you believe that anybody would disagree with the notion
00:27:59.000 that it's obvious it didn't mean all black people?
00:28:02.000 It's obvious, right?
00:28:04.000 Yeah, I think a few people did on the conservative side.
00:28:08.000 On the conservative side, people got it.
00:28:10.000 You know, I told you before,
00:28:12.000 this shook out as just a political outcome.
00:28:16.000 It's being presented by the news as a racial story.
00:28:22.000 Except that the audience that's offended is only Democrats.
00:28:29.000 Have you seen any news coverage that said conservatives,
00:28:34.000 both black and white, generally agree with Scott
00:28:38.000 because they've looked at the context?
00:28:40.000 Have you seen that?
00:28:42.000 Has anybody reported anywhere that conservatives,
00:28:45.000 both black and white, agree with me?
00:28:49.000 Once they see the context.
00:28:51.000 Nobody's reported that.
00:28:53.000 Right?
00:28:54.000 Who reported that?
00:28:55.000 Nobody.
00:28:56.000 Not even the conservative side reported it.
00:28:59.000 Do you know why?
00:29:01.000 I think even conservatives don't want to say conservatives agree with me.
00:29:04.000 It's like a little too hot at the moment.
00:29:07.000 But it's true.
00:29:08.000 You could look at social media.
00:29:10.000 You could look at the coverage.
00:29:12.000 Like the worst criticism I got from the right was that I depended on a poll that I didn't actually depend on.
00:29:19.000 Like the worst criticism on the right is just a wrong fact.
00:29:24.000 They think I depended on something I didn't depend on.
00:29:27.000 So, let's see.
00:29:34.000 So, of course, you know the media likes to do mind reading.
00:29:37.000 I talk about that all the time.
00:29:38.000 What's he thinking?
00:29:39.000 You know, what was he thinking?
00:29:40.000 All that stuff.
00:29:41.000 You see that all the time.
00:29:42.000 So here's some of the...
00:29:44.000 They start with this headline, Cartoonist Goes on Racist Rant.
00:29:48.000 And here's just a sample of the super important context that was left out.
00:29:54.000 Just a sample, right?
00:29:57.000 That cartooning is not my main focus.
00:30:01.000 And I think it's not in the top five most impactful things I've done for society.
00:30:09.000 Now, you don't know all of them because some of them are behind the curtain.
00:30:15.000 But cartooning is not really the biggest thing I do.
00:30:18.000 It's not the biggest impact I have on the world.
00:30:21.000 If you don't mention that, like I said.
00:30:24.000 So, you should also know that the story needs to say that I have spoken many times,
00:30:34.000 and you can confirm this, about attracting energy with hyperbole.
00:30:40.000 How many of you heard me say that that's a good way to attract attention?
00:30:44.000 I write about Trump.
00:30:46.000 So it's actually in writing and in live streams, right?
00:30:49.000 So if you don't mention that I'm a person who has often said,
00:30:53.000 I use hyperbole to attract attention,
00:30:56.000 and then once I've attracted, I reframe the situation so that everybody wins.
00:31:01.000 How many times have I told you that?
00:31:04.000 Now, imagine that context being left out of this story.
00:31:09.000 Who has reported that?
00:31:12.000 Nobody.
00:31:13.000 Who has reported that I identify as left of Bernie?
00:31:18.000 The LA Times said I'm a Democrat.
00:31:23.000 At the same time, other entities were saying I was a MAGA Republican.
00:31:28.000 At the same time.
00:31:30.000 Both of them are wrong.
00:31:32.000 I'm not a Democrat, although I don't know if I've ever, I may have registered sometime a million years ago.
00:31:39.000 And I don't identify as conservative or Republican.
00:31:43.000 Who reported that?
00:31:45.000 I mean, just ask yourself.
00:31:47.000 Which journalist reported that I'm not MAGA, I'm not conservative, I'm not Republican, I'm not Democrat,
00:31:55.000 but I do say I'm left of Bernie.
00:31:58.000 And I support it.
00:31:59.000 I mean, I can give you examples.
00:32:01.000 Who reported that I worked with Black Lives Matter and tried to help?
00:32:05.000 Who reported that I posed Confederate statues, even though my audience overwhelmingly supported keeping them?
00:32:12.000 Who reported that I supported Kaepernick's protest, which was not that different than mine in some ways?
00:32:22.000 The reason I liked Kaepernick is that he caused trouble and he brought attention to the topic he wanted attention on.
00:32:31.000 Can't beat that.
00:32:33.000 For a protest.
00:32:34.000 Made everybody uncomfortable and made everybody think about his topic.
00:32:37.000 100% successful.
00:32:39.000 So I supported him as a protest.
00:32:42.000 How many reported that I support affirmative action, even though this is the third time I've lost a career because I'm a white male?
00:32:53.000 Who reported that?
00:32:55.000 Now, I've supported affirmative action historically, but I think it's about time we take a smarter look at it and maybe move from a sledgehammer to a scalpel.
00:33:06.000 The scalpel is personal growth and education.
00:33:11.000 If you fix education for black people, as well as everybody poor, and you fix... 0.72
00:33:17.000 Maybe everybody rich, too.
00:33:18.000 I think education is just broken for everybody at the moment, so it's not even a poor person's stuff.
00:33:23.000 But if you fix all that, and you make sure that any individual has the tools of success, they can slice through systemic racism.
00:33:32.000 At the same time, you might be trying to dismantle it in the long run.
00:33:36.000 What would be a better way to dismantle systemic racism than to have a disproportionate number of black young people get the tools to become rich and successful?
00:33:51.000 That's the best way to fight it.
00:33:53.000 I mean, you could try all the institutional stuff, and maybe that's important, too.
00:33:57.000 But if you don't make an individual invulnerable, it's going to be hard to get a long-term gain.
00:34:04.000 Who reported that I've been trying for a long time to reframe our racial conversation?
00:34:11.000 Don't you think that's kind of a big context?
00:34:14.000 I've been trying to reframe it.
00:34:16.000 You've been watching me in public for years.
00:34:18.000 At the same time that I say I use hyperbole to bring attention to the thing I'm trying to reframe.
00:34:24.000 Kind of important.
00:34:29.000 Who reports on all the other racist stuff I approve of?
00:34:34.000 So one of the racist things I approve of, and some of this is a repeat for you, but it's good to see it in context.
00:34:39.000 Historically black colleges.
00:34:41.000 I approve of those.
00:34:43.000 That seems pretty racist to me.
00:34:45.000 It's just the good kind.
00:34:47.000 It's the good kind.
00:34:49.000 We're way beyond the point where anything is now racist.
00:34:53.000 Anything that has any racial component is racist, according to the new rules.
00:35:01.000 So there are a whole bunch of racist things I like.
00:35:03.000 Like affirmative action, historically.
00:35:05.000 Black History Month.
00:35:07.000 Not everybody gets a History Month.
00:35:09.000 But I'm in favor of Black History Month.
00:35:11.000 I think that's important enough to call it out.
00:35:14.000 Who is paying their own money and spending their own time to create a success curriculum, which I've told you in public a number of times, I think one of its greatest benefits is for black Americans.
00:35:26.000 Because systemic racism in one way, it limits the, let's say, accidental contact that anybody who has a low income has with people who are successful.
00:35:40.000 So if you don't have a casual contact with people who know, let's say, the techniques for success, it's hard to just figure it out on your own.
00:35:50.000 So if you can make people more successful individually, then everything starts working better, like in a hundred different ways.
00:36:04.000 How many people, how many of them reported that, even though my audience is solidly conservative most of the time, that I often tell them systemic racism is real?
00:36:16.000 And I point to the teachers union, as in my opinion, the biggest part of systemic racism.
00:36:23.000 Because they're the ones who prevent school choice.
00:36:25.000 And without school choice, you can't really improve anything.
00:36:28.000 I mean, nobody's figured out how.
00:36:30.000 So, and here's one, I've never said this before, but this is totally racist.
00:36:37.000 A lot of people ask me for individual advice, which I can't do on a scale, because, you know, I can't really do that on a scale.
00:36:48.000 But I'm far more likely to give individual advice to black people who ask for it. 1.00
00:36:54.000 Racist.
00:36:56.000 And I do it, I think, in part because I think that there's this inequality in access to people who have advice.
00:37:05.000 And so I think, oh, well, I can do this one little thing that, you know, balances it down a little bit.
00:37:12.000 So there are a lot of things I've done which, in my opinion, are pretty damn racist.
00:37:17.000 In a good way.
00:37:19.000 In a good way.
00:37:20.000 Mostly the stuff that people on the left would agree with.
00:37:23.000 And what I'm doing now, with my current drama, is it racist?
00:37:32.000 Yeah, you can call it that.
00:37:34.000 Whatever you want.
00:37:35.000 Whatever you want.
00:37:36.000 It's my job to make it the good kind.
00:37:39.000 Right?
00:37:40.000 It's my job to make it the good kind.
00:37:43.000 Now, there's a larger conversation here about the anti-white trend in America.
00:37:49.000 Let me poll the audience, so that I'm not depending on Erasmus and Poll.
00:37:58.000 You ready for this?
00:37:59.000 Here's the big question.
00:38:00.000 Do you observe, just your own opinion, based on the signals and anything you see in life,
00:38:08.000 do you observe a growing anti-white sentiment in the country?
00:38:14.000 Yes or no?
00:38:15.000 Is there a growing anti-white sentiment?
00:38:19.000 Right?
00:38:20.000 It's just a wall of yes.
00:38:22.000 So, how misleading is it?
00:38:25.000 Ask yourself, how misleading is it that anybody's focusing on the Erasmus and Poll,
00:38:30.000 when so far 100% of you that I see answering are agreeing?
00:38:34.000 100%.
00:38:35.000 I don't think I've ever asked a question that got 100% before.
00:38:39.000 Look at your own answers.
00:38:41.000 Every person here agrees with that.
00:38:45.000 And then you watch the media crucify me because I used the Erasmus and Poll
00:38:52.000 as a jumping off place for this conversation.
00:38:55.000 100% of you see it.
00:38:57.000 100%.
00:38:58.000 There's not a single person here saying no.
00:39:00.000 And I know there are some media people and some dislikers.
00:39:04.000 Now, I'm aware of the fact that people's window into this topic, that's certainly my drama,
00:39:15.000 you have different reasons.
00:39:17.000 You know, there's a group of people who just want to talk about the anti-whiteness trend
00:39:22.000 and to them, I'm a hero this week because I said it out loud.
00:39:27.000 And I'll say it even louder today.
00:39:29.000 And I'll say it as loud as you want.
00:39:32.000 It's so obvious at this point that anti-Asian too?
00:39:37.000 Anti-Asian trend?
00:39:39.000 I think so.
00:39:41.000 In a different way.
00:39:42.000 Certainly college admissions.
00:39:44.000 Maybe in terms of violence.
00:39:46.000 But, you know, we all have a violence problem.
00:39:49.000 But I think the anti-white bias is out loud.
00:39:53.000 I don't see people on social media who could directly say something bad
00:40:01.000 about Asian-Americans and get away with it. 0.99
00:40:04.000 I don't think he can.
00:40:06.000 But you can say anything you want about black Americans.
00:40:09.000 All right.
00:40:10.000 Now, here's...
00:40:12.000 Oh, yeah.
00:40:13.000 It's two sides.
00:40:14.000 Let's do the Ellen Dershowitz test. 0.99
00:40:29.000 Are you ready for this?
00:40:31.000 Here's another quiz for you.
00:40:33.000 If a black American had said exactly what I said, would they be canceled? 0.77
00:40:40.000 And you could answer it either way.
00:40:43.000 You could either say they said literally exactly what I said.
00:40:47.000 Or you could say...
00:40:49.000 Suppose they said the black version of that, which was,
00:40:53.000 I wouldn't want to live near a lot of white people if I thought a high percentage of them were racist.
00:40:59.000 So here would be the way to look at it, let's say, if you're black.
00:41:03.000 Let's say if you're black and you have two choices of where to go live.
00:41:07.000 Let's say you have, you know, some mobility in terms of where you live.
00:41:12.000 And one of those choices is they're both mostly white. 0.51
00:41:15.000 There's two places, mostly white.
00:41:17.000 One of them you know because of the, you know, you just know because of the zip code.
00:41:22.000 There's a lot of racists in it.
00:41:24.000 You don't know the percentage, but there's a lot of racists there. 0.85
00:41:27.000 White racists.
00:41:29.000 There's another one that has also a lot of white people, but they're left leaning and they're,
00:41:33.000 they're going to be, you know, definitely pro you in a big, much bigger way.
00:41:38.000 If you said I'd rather live with the white people who are in the zip code with less racism,
00:41:46.000 would anybody object to that?
00:41:48.000 Not anybody.
00:41:50.000 Literally nobody would object to that.
00:41:52.000 It wouldn't even occur to you that it was anything to object to.
00:41:56.000 Like it wouldn't even cross your mind to object to it.
00:42:01.000 Now, of course I'm aware that because of the history of the country,
00:42:07.000 there are some things that, you know, white people can't say that black people can. 0.84
00:42:11.000 Right?
00:42:12.000 I've never complained, well, maybe when I was a teenager or something, but as an adult,
00:42:17.000 I don't think I've ever complained that white people get in trouble for using the N-word.
00:42:22.000 It's not a big deal.
00:42:24.000 And I understand that.
00:42:26.000 Like historically, if you want to carve out an exception, all right, there's your exception to free speech.
00:42:31.000 I was like, oh, okay, that's a good exception.
00:42:34.000 No problem.
00:42:36.000 Right?
00:42:37.000 So which news outlet, which journalist said if a black person had said it or any version of it,
00:42:45.000 nobody would even blink?
00:42:47.000 Did anybody report that?
00:42:50.000 Because that's part of the anti-white trend. 0.84
00:42:53.000 How many journalists reported that my cancellation itself, given that a black person could have said exactly the same thing without consequence, 0.77
00:43:03.000 how many people reported that my cancellation is the biggest signal of anti-whiteness?
00:43:10.000 It's the biggest signal.
00:43:12.000 So you don't even need the Rasmussen poll.
00:43:14.000 You just use my cancellation.
00:43:16.000 Because I'm only cancelled for being white. 0.92
00:43:20.000 Let's be honest.
00:43:21.000 Nobody would be cancelled for this if they were white. 1.00
00:43:24.000 I'm not even sure an Asian American would be cancelled, but I think it would be risky.
00:43:29.000 Hispanic American, probably risky. 1.00
00:43:31.000 But, you know, if you're a white man, you're pretty much cancelled.
00:43:38.000 Now, and let me say this again as clearly as possible.
00:43:42.000 Black people have been great.
00:43:45.000 Through this whole drama, the black, at least just the people I have access to and see on social media, 1.00
00:43:52.000 they're generally, let's talk about this, or, you know, we should look into this, or there must be some missing context,
00:43:59.000 or they just flat out agree, which is the most common response.
00:44:04.000 But only if they know the background, right?
00:44:07.000 The people who don't know the context are in a different situation.
00:44:11.000 But white Americans have cancelled me now three times for being a white American.
00:44:15.000 You know, two corporate jobs, where my bosses told me directly,
00:44:19.000 we're no longer going to promote white men directly, like those words.
00:44:25.000 And, well, the Hodge twins were an example of people who didn't have the full context.
00:44:32.000 I would imagine if they had the context, like everybody else.
00:44:36.000 Because keep in mind, I've literally met nobody who understood the context who had a problem with it.
00:44:42.000 Think about that.
00:44:44.000 Actually, nobody.
00:44:45.000 Not a single person.
00:44:47.000 So when people are asking me, like, how I'm suffering, you know, like, how am I getting through this?
00:44:53.000 Like, you probably don't know that everybody agrees with me.
00:44:57.000 Actually, everybody.
00:44:59.000 Let me say that again.
00:45:01.000 This one is, I don't think this one is too much hyperbole.
00:45:05.000 You know, nothing's 100%, right?
00:45:07.000 So as soon as you hear everybody, you should automatically say, okay, not 100%.
00:45:11.000 But 100% of the people who know the context, 100% of the people who know the context agree with me.
00:45:18.000 It doesn't matter who they are.
00:45:21.000 All right.
00:45:24.000 Well, that's enough about me.
00:45:27.000 I got 3.7 million views on a tweet on a different topic, where I said that there's a difference in how the right and the left get fooled.
00:45:38.000 The right tends to organically bubble up their own conspiracy theories.
00:45:44.000 And as we've seen, many of them end up being true.
00:45:48.000 But they at least come up organically from people who actually believe it within the conservative side.
00:45:53.000 The untruths on the left are far more often, and alarmingly more often, deliberate misinformation and propaganda made up by political operators.
00:46:08.000 That's really different.
00:46:11.000 It's really different.
00:46:12.000 Now I didn't know that that was so obvious.
00:46:14.000 But 3.7 million views on that point kind of tells me that people have noticed.
00:46:24.000 At least conservatives have noticed.
00:46:26.000 So that seemed to hit a...
00:46:28.000 I thought maybe people would push back on that and say, no, that's too much of a generalization.
00:46:33.000 Here are some examples to prove you wrong.
00:46:36.000 But it appears that people see the same pattern I do.
00:46:41.000 And then Rasmussen did a poll on bail reform.
00:46:48.000 So if you had to guess, how many Americans...
00:46:54.000 And by this isn't one of those 25% things.
00:46:57.000 Oh wait, it is.
00:47:00.000 Yeah, it is.
00:47:05.000 Never mind.
00:47:07.000 Of course it is.
00:47:08.000 Of course it is.
00:47:09.000 I just didn't see it.
00:47:10.000 Because it was represented as the opposite.
00:47:13.000 Let me tell you what I mean.
00:47:15.000 A majority of every political category, including 72% of Democrats, think it's a danger to the community.
00:47:26.000 That if somebody is a danger to the community, that should be considered in whether they get bail.
00:47:31.000 72% of Democrats.
00:47:34.000 That means you got 28% of Democrats who think that the danger to the community should not be considered with bail.
00:47:49.000 The fact that it's a murderous serial killer.
00:47:53.000 28% of Democrats are thinking, I don't see how that's relevant.
00:47:58.000 Well, yeah.
00:48:00.000 Well, yeah, he killed people before he was in jail.
00:48:03.000 But how is that relevant?
00:48:06.000 And he said, yeah, he says he'll kill more if you let him out.
00:48:10.000 Yes.
00:48:11.000 But I don't see how that's relevant.
00:48:13.000 Let's treat everybody the same.
00:48:15.000 So yeah, that 25% or-ish number that everybody gets wrong in every poll, there it is.
00:48:24.000 But it was only the Democrats.
00:48:26.000 But weirdly, 19% of Republicans agreed with that.
00:48:30.000 19% of Republicans agreed that you should ignore somebody's actual crimes when deciding whether they get out on bail.
00:48:40.000 What the hell?
00:48:41.000 Now, this is triggered by, I guess, Governor DeSantis.
00:48:44.000 He made headlines last month because he was mocking New York as the only state that doesn't allow judges to consider the crime and the risk to society when they're making bail decisions.
00:48:57.000 I didn't know that.
00:48:58.000 Did you know that, by the way, this is a Rasmussen poll.
00:49:04.000 I did not know that New York is the only state that doesn't consider the danger to the community.
00:49:15.000 Unbelievable.
00:49:16.000 They don't consider the danger to the community.
00:49:21.000 All right.
00:49:22.000 Here's another story I saw in a tweet from Bronwyn Williams on Twitter.
00:49:28.000 And she's quoting somebody, help her and et cetera.
00:49:31.000 I guess there's a study.
00:49:33.000 Quote, adolescents with an IQ of 130, so that would be a high-ish IQ, were three to five times less likely to have had intercourse than those with average IQ.
00:49:48.000 And boys with an IQ that would qualify for intellectual disability, 60, an IQ of 60, were still more likely to have had sex than those with a very high IQ, 130.
00:50:03.000 Well, I don't see any problem there, do you?
00:50:08.000 Moving on.
00:50:09.000 No problem there.
00:50:14.000 Does that explain everything?
00:50:17.000 Now, how long has this trend been going on?
00:50:21.000 Are we intentionally breeding an entire generation of idiots?
00:50:28.000 Has idiocracy, you know, begun for sure, like the movies just starting, first scene?
00:50:36.000 Somebody says, it's time to start considering people with high IQs as having a disability.
00:50:44.000 Wait, let me say that again, that's too good.
00:50:47.000 It's time to start considering people with high IQs as having a disability.
00:50:52.000 Because they can't get laid. 1.00
00:50:55.000 That's like actually like a real-world problem based on their physicality.
00:51:03.000 How is that not a disability?
00:51:06.000 It's based on their physicality, mostly, probably.
00:51:09.000 I'll bet it's not based on their minds.
00:51:11.000 And they can't, they don't have access to reproduction like everybody else does as much.
00:51:19.000 That feels like a disability. 0.51
00:51:22.000 I don't think it'll be described that way.
00:51:26.000 But it would certainly, certainly tell us what's going on.
00:51:34.000 Here's my counter to that.
00:51:37.000 The only people who ever matter are the smart ones.
00:51:41.000 And they're the ones who do everything.
00:51:46.000 They invent everything, they figure everything out.
00:51:49.000 Most people don't need to be smart.
00:51:51.000 If you could snap your fingers and make everybody in the United States have an IQ of 130 or more, would you do it?
00:52:00.000 You could let everybody, everybody would just immediately go up to 130.
00:52:06.000 Would you do it?
00:52:07.000 No, it would destroy the country.
00:52:09.000 It would actually just destroy the country.
00:52:12.000 Right?
00:52:13.000 The worst thing you want is a bunch of smart people making a decision.
00:52:16.000 They would end up like Congress.
00:52:18.000 You know, even as incompetent as Congress is, part of the problem is that they're all smart.
00:52:23.000 You know, roughly speaking, they're smart.
00:52:25.000 You put a, there was once a study, and I think it's true, and I'm going to say I think it's true because it matches my experience.
00:52:34.000 And I think it was a military study from a million years ago.
00:52:37.000 And they were trying to find out the most effective small groups.
00:52:40.000 And they tested a group that had all, you know, high functioning smart people in it.
00:52:46.000 And they compared that to groups that had maybe one smart person, but the rest were not so smart.
00:52:51.000 Who did better?
00:52:53.000 Who did better?
00:52:54.000 The one with all smart people in the small group, or the group that had one smart person and some lesser smart person?
00:53:01.000 Well, they found consistently the one smart person was the better deal.
00:53:05.000 Do you know why?
00:53:07.000 Because the people less smart would recognize the smart one as the smart one.
00:53:12.000 And they would look at each other and say, you got a better idea?
00:53:15.000 And they would say no.
00:53:17.000 And then they would follow the smart one.
00:53:19.000 So there you have a quick decision.
00:53:21.000 Like there's not a lot of argument.
00:53:23.000 And then it follows a smart person's path.
00:53:27.000 Doesn't mean it's right.
00:53:29.000 Doesn't mean it's right.
00:53:30.000 But at least it was smart.
00:53:32.000 Now, if you put four smart people in a small group, what happens?
00:53:36.000 All four of them believe the only smart path is their path.
00:53:40.000 And they don't agree on the path.
00:53:42.000 It's chaos, right?
00:53:44.000 It's chaos.
00:53:45.000 You need a mix of smart people and people who say, okay, you're smarter than I am.
00:53:52.000 You make the decision.
00:53:54.000 That's your best situation.
00:53:57.000 So it might not make any difference at all how much the people with IQs under a certain level are mating.
00:54:06.000 I mean, mating with somebody with an IQ of 60 feels like a bad play.
00:54:13.000 But it's probably been happening forever.
00:54:15.000 Do you think that the early settlers were looking around for the high IQ people?
00:54:23.000 I don't think so.
00:54:26.000 I don't think so.
00:54:27.000 I think they were just hooking up with anybody who was available who was willing to say yes.
00:54:31.000 And sometimes even if they weren't willing.
00:54:34.000 Say it.
00:54:37.000 All right.
00:54:39.000 Is it more important to be a sociopath than smart?
00:54:44.000 Well, I don't know which one gives you more success, but they both have their benefits.
00:54:48.000 All right.
00:54:49.000 Ladies and gentlemen, I'm going to be on Chris Cuomo tonight on NewsNation.
00:54:54.000 Google NewsNation to figure out how to follow it to where you are.
00:54:59.000 Probably has to be on your cable network before you can.
00:55:02.000 And I think so.
00:55:04.000 There might be some other way to watch it.
00:55:05.000 But I think it has to be on your cable network.
00:55:09.000 But the app works too if you use the credentials for your network.
00:55:15.000 All right.
00:55:16.000 I'm going to say goodbye to the YouTube people.
00:55:19.000 And I'll talk to you tomorrow.
00:55:21.000 Thanks for joining.
00:55:22.000 We'll see you tomorrow.
00:55:23.000 Thanks for joining.
00:55:24.000 Bye.
00:55:26.000 Bye.
00:55:27.000 Bye.
00:55:28.000 Bye.
00:55:30.000 Bye.
00:55:31.000 Bye.
00:55:32.000 Bye.
00:55:34.000 Bye.
00:55:35.000 Bye.
00:55:36.000 Bye.
00:55:37.000 Bye.
00:55:39.000 Bye.
00:55:42.000 Bye.
00:55:44.000 Bye.
00:55:45.000 Add on NewsNation.