Real Coffee with Scott Adams - March 11, 2023


Episode 2044 Scott Adams: Silicon Valley Bank Debacle, Free Jacob Chansley Or Close Congress, More


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 16 minutes

Words per Minute

142.93925

Word Count

10,942

Sentence Count

925

Misogynist Sentences

8

Hate Speech Sentences

24


Summary

In this episode of The Daily Show with Bill Maher, Alex Blumberg talks about Joe Biden's Alaska drilling plan, Greta Thunberg's new book, and Bill Maher's take on Elon Musk's plan to build a utopia.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the best thing that ever happened to you.
00:00:05.900 It's a highlight of civilization, and there's never been a finer thing that's ever happened,
00:00:11.420 but if you'd like to take this experience up to, oh, I don't know, the heights of a Chinese spy balloon,
00:00:19.100 all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass of tank or chalice or stein, a canteen joke or flask,
00:00:23.820 a vessel of any kind, fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:00:27.380 I like coffee.
00:00:28.420 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day,
00:00:32.220 the thing that makes everything better.
00:00:33.840 It's called the simultaneous sip, and it's going to happen now.
00:00:38.100 Coming at you, hard.
00:00:43.300 Savor it.
00:00:45.000 Savor it.
00:00:46.700 Okay, good.
00:00:50.940 Well, here's the most important question of the day.
00:00:55.120 I know there's a lot of big news.
00:00:56.400 You'll want to hear all of it.
00:00:57.600 We'll talk about it.
00:00:58.960 But I've got to start with the most important one.
00:01:02.140 It was sort of a question I had yesterday, so I tweeted it.
00:01:06.020 If Joe Biden is called POTUS, P-O-T-U-S, and Jill Biden, his wife, is called the FLOTUS,
00:01:13.300 what is Hunter Biden?
00:01:16.700 Anybody have an answer?
00:01:17.920 If Joe Biden is POTUS and Jill Biden is FLOTUS, what is Hunter Biden?
00:01:23.020 I suggested SCROTUS, but I thought that was pretty darn clever until Twitter user David, at David said what,
00:01:37.080 suggested even better than SCROTUS would be SNORTUS.
00:01:41.240 So the POTUS, the FLOTUS, and the SNORTUS.
00:01:47.460 Come on, SNORTUS is pretty good.
00:01:49.920 I wish I'd said that.
00:01:51.080 Well, apparently Biden is going to approve some massive drilling project in Alaska.
00:01:58.560 I did not see that coming.
00:02:01.560 Did anybody see Biden approves massive drilling in Alaska?
00:02:07.360 Is it possible that he always would have?
00:02:12.840 Is it possible that he was always going to approve it, and there's nothing unusual about it?
00:02:18.360 Or is he seeing that he destroyed the world with his energy policy, and he's trying to adjust?
00:02:26.220 Or is it because an election is coming, and he needs to be able to say,
00:02:31.140 I approved all kinds of oil.
00:02:33.340 I approved more oil than Trump did.
00:02:35.520 I think that's the play, right?
00:02:38.340 He just needs to say he approved more oil than Trump did to run for president.
00:02:44.040 Now, here's the question I have.
00:02:46.540 How was it ever possible that activists beat the big oil money lobbying machine?
00:02:57.420 Didn't you always assume that the oil and the energy companies completely controlled Congress,
00:03:02.640 completely controlled the president?
00:03:05.520 But it turns out that Greta, using her as just a symbol of the activists,
00:03:12.240 they were more powerful than the money people for a long time.
00:03:15.320 But maybe that's reversed.
00:03:17.180 It could be that the money people upped their bid.
00:03:21.300 They may have increased their bid.
00:03:23.380 So you never know.
00:03:24.100 This is exactly the kind of story where you think you might know something about it because you read the news.
00:03:30.080 Do you think we understand this story because we read the news?
00:03:33.420 I feel like this is exactly the kind of story where there's layers and variables that we don't know about.
00:03:42.180 Oh, well.
00:03:44.280 I saw a clip from real time.
00:03:46.640 Bill Maher must have aired last night.
00:03:48.460 In which Bill Maher mentions Elon Musk's plan to build a city in Austin that he's calling a utopia.
00:03:58.880 A utopia.
00:04:00.160 And what did his Democrat guests do when Bill Maher said that Musk wants to build a utopia?
00:04:06.740 Let's see if this sounds familiar.
00:04:12.320 They immediately leapt to the idea that utopia was a literal word and not hyperbole.
00:04:22.080 Have you ever seen Democrats not understand the difference between hyperbole when it's really obvious, like utopia?
00:04:30.880 It's sort of an obvious utopia.
00:04:33.000 It's like really, really obvious.
00:04:34.700 And they treated it like he meant it.
00:04:38.340 Like he meant it.
00:04:40.460 So instead of saying, oh, it's a city where costs might be low and it's very efficient,
00:04:48.180 that's probably all Elon means.
00:04:50.420 It's just efficient.
00:04:52.140 It just works well.
00:04:53.240 It's well designed.
00:04:54.880 And they went to, and they actually did the Democrat face.
00:04:58.880 Have you ever seen Democrat face when they don't have an argument?
00:05:01.560 They go to mocking, that mocking, you know, that face.
00:05:15.620 So watching the panel go into Democrat face.
00:05:18.420 And poor Bill Maher, who actually has, you know, some semblance of ability to see the whole field, you know, unlike all of his guests.
00:05:30.280 He's trying to explain to them without ruining their fun that Elon Musk, you know, he did build an electric car you weren't expecting.
00:05:39.000 And he did build a rocket that can land by itself.
00:05:46.120 And he is going to Mars.
00:05:49.900 Maybe the city idea isn't totally crazy.
00:05:54.480 Just putting that out there.
00:05:56.600 Maybe he has some good ideas to build a city.
00:05:59.260 But it's just amazing watching the, like, they have to use their face when they have no argument.
00:06:08.280 You know, you can imagine the mental process.
00:06:11.420 Hearing things I don't like.
00:06:13.540 Must make logical argument to refute.
00:06:16.560 Searching.
00:06:17.380 Searching for logical argument to refute.
00:06:19.940 The concept that Elon Musk might know how to build some things that other people don't know how to build.
00:06:25.100 Don't know what to do.
00:06:26.000 Must default to facial expressions.
00:06:34.540 Now, if you're listening on a podcast, I'm just kidding.
00:06:42.600 I'm canceled on podcasts.
00:06:44.980 Did you know that?
00:06:46.260 Apparently, I think Apple dropped me from the podcast store.
00:06:51.520 It could be a technical problem.
00:06:53.300 It might be a technical problem.
00:06:54.780 But, as far as you know, this is not on podcasts anymore as of a few days ago, right?
00:07:05.300 Can anybody confirm?
00:07:06.760 Yeah, I'm canceled on the Apple store.
00:07:10.760 I think.
00:07:11.760 It could be a technical problem.
00:07:13.500 So, don't assume until I look into it.
00:07:15.440 All right.
00:07:21.060 Elon Musk.
00:07:22.040 All the stories about Elon Musk today.
00:07:24.740 So, Elon Musk tweeted,
00:07:26.460 Free Jacob Chansley, who you know as the QAnon shaman who's in jail for doing nothing dangerous on January 6th
00:07:34.440 and telling people to go home, because Trump tweeted it, and walking around in a friendly manner with the law enforcement people.
00:07:44.540 So, still in jail, and Elon Musk is calling it.
00:07:47.960 And, of course, somebody immediately accused him of being a MAGA guy.
00:07:51.680 Like, that's all Democrats have now is, oh, well, I've got a good insult.
00:07:58.300 How about my insult?
00:07:59.860 I hear your good reasons and your data, but have you seen my ad hominems?
00:08:05.000 Eh?
00:08:05.520 I'd call that a tie.
00:08:07.180 With me a little bit ahead.
00:08:09.080 That's what I call a tie.
00:08:10.120 Can you remind me to say something about equity toward the end?
00:08:17.320 I've got this great equity point that I keep wanting to fit in somewhere, but remind me at the end.
00:08:24.160 All right.
00:08:26.060 So, then Elon tweeted,
00:08:28.300 I'm not part of MAGA, but I do believe in fairness of justice.
00:08:32.480 Chansley was falsely portrayed in the media as a violent criminal who tried to overthrow the state
00:08:36.840 and who urged others to commit violence.
00:08:38.640 That was the exact opposite of who he was.
00:08:41.900 And Elon goes on.
00:08:42.800 But here he is urging people to be peaceful and go home.
00:08:46.200 And the other video shows him calmly walking in the Capitol building,
00:08:50.020 being escorted by officers and then thanking the officers.
00:08:54.800 This is yet another one of those situations where the, you know, internet dads are trying to help.
00:09:01.060 Again, dads is not necessarily just men.
00:09:04.160 But people who have a certain perspective on life.
00:09:07.460 Sort of a dad vibe.
00:09:09.780 And I think Elon has the greatest dad vibe of anybody at this point.
00:09:16.480 Because this is just a personal, this is a non-political opinion.
00:09:20.780 Wouldn't you say?
00:09:23.140 Does anything, does anything, do you think Elon's opinion looks political?
00:09:26.840 I don't see any politics in it whatsoever.
00:09:31.160 Somebody says Spotify was airing my podcast yesterday, so that's good news.
00:09:38.760 Yeah, this is not even, this is not even political.
00:09:41.220 This is about a citizen and the legal system.
00:09:44.180 There's no politics in this whatsoever.
00:09:46.480 You know, the larger event was.
00:09:47.880 But not, not Jacob.
00:09:49.220 Jacob, this is not a political question at all.
00:09:53.540 Now, I got two million views on a tweet where I said that the Republicans should close Congress
00:10:03.140 until they free Jacob Chanceley.
00:10:06.540 And I just don't have a better idea, do you?
00:10:11.080 It would be one thing if there were, if we had some doubt about, well, you know, maybe the legal system should work this out
00:10:18.040 because we don't know all the facts.
00:10:20.320 But we know enough.
00:10:22.220 I feel like we know enough.
00:10:24.560 And there, and by the way, there's no counter narrative that I'm aware of.
00:10:28.480 Have you seen any?
00:10:29.140 Is there any counter narrative that says, oh, yeah, that, that QAnon shaman, he actually stabbed a guy?
00:10:35.880 Nobody's saying that.
00:10:37.580 Nobody's saying that the video is fake.
00:10:40.800 We've now seen enough that reasonable doubt is, reasonable doubt is just so all over this,
00:10:48.740 if not outright the most innocent anybody could be.
00:10:52.620 At the very least, at the very least, you know, he didn't hurt anybody.
00:10:58.280 There's a lot of doubt about whether any crime was committed that he was aware of.
00:11:04.200 I don't think he was aware of any crime.
00:11:06.380 It looked like he was allowed in.
00:11:09.180 You know, that was my take on it.
00:11:10.300 It looked like they didn't mind him being in there.
00:11:12.040 He was going to let him walk around, do your thing, then leave.
00:11:16.860 So do you have a better idea than Republicans just saying, you know, we're done?
00:11:22.880 We're done.
00:11:23.600 Just close Congress.
00:11:24.620 We're not going to take a meeting.
00:11:25.880 We're just going to cancel everything.
00:11:27.180 Cancel all, just clear my schedule.
00:11:29.840 Congress is closed.
00:11:33.800 Now, in a perfect world, it would only take one day for that to work.
00:11:38.560 But I can't think of another idea, can you?
00:11:42.060 I know what won't work, forming a protest and going down to where he's being held.
00:11:48.700 Pretty sure a protest won't help.
00:11:51.600 Am I wrong?
00:11:52.420 There's no way a protest is going to make any difference.
00:11:54.300 They'll just arrest more protesters.
00:11:56.720 They'll say, oh, there's some more of those mega insurrectionists.
00:11:59.320 Let's get them.
00:12:00.020 Round them up.
00:12:01.020 So that's not going to work.
00:12:02.460 So if you can't protest and the legal system is just clearly broken, I mean, in my opinion,
00:12:09.040 that is just a broken system.
00:12:11.860 We all see it.
00:12:12.960 I don't think there's any ambiguity about this one.
00:12:16.780 We all see it.
00:12:17.700 And I get the argument that most of the ones for being held for nonviolent crimes should be pardoned.
00:12:24.060 I get that.
00:12:25.020 But this one is so plain and so easy and so obvious.
00:12:28.360 How do Republicans let this stand?
00:12:32.620 Not because they're Republicans, mind you, but because they want a justice system that works.
00:12:38.960 It's not even political.
00:12:40.880 Now, I would say everybody in Congress should, you know, do something.
00:12:45.160 But you know the Democrats won't.
00:12:47.160 You know, they just won't.
00:12:48.740 So, I don't know.
00:12:51.080 Do you have a better idea?
00:12:53.060 Do you think we can just let it slide?
00:12:55.280 Is this something we can just let go?
00:12:59.420 And let me answer one critic who said,
00:13:03.100 Scott, do you think this is, like, the most important thing happening?
00:13:08.820 Do you think this is the most, you know, injustice?
00:13:11.740 This is the injustice you decided to focus on?
00:13:15.180 You know, this one person, this one guy?
00:13:18.040 And my response was, no, it's not the only injustice.
00:13:21.960 It's the easiest one to fix.
00:13:24.220 That's what's pissing us off.
00:13:27.800 It's the easiest one to fix, and they're not doing it.
00:13:33.180 Now, the fact that we're not fixing systemic justice or systemic racism overnight, I get that.
00:13:39.980 That's hard.
00:13:41.640 Yeah, that doesn't happen overnight.
00:13:43.220 But this really should happen in an hour.
00:13:45.620 There's no reason he should be in there for one more hour.
00:13:51.060 We all see it.
00:13:52.700 It's obvious.
00:13:54.200 The system is absolutely disrespecting us.
00:13:58.640 This is disrespect of the citizens.
00:14:02.360 Absolute disrespect.
00:14:03.520 And maybe our system needs to learn to respect us.
00:14:12.180 Now, I don't think that the protest would work.
00:14:16.040 I'd like our leaders to shut the government down.
00:14:19.080 Just shut the fucking government.
00:14:20.640 Because if the government can't fix this fucking thing, I don't want it.
00:14:25.280 I don't even want a government.
00:14:28.340 This is a special note to people who don't understand hyperbole in the wild.
00:14:34.340 Sometimes Scott says things which were intended to make a point that, if it is taken in its literal sense, could be misleading to NPCs and Democrats.
00:14:47.100 This has been a notice for NPCs and people who don't understand hyperbole and context.
00:14:56.040 Except that I do mean shut the government.
00:14:59.820 I literally mean it.
00:15:01.280 I mean, just close the doors, walk away.
00:15:03.540 You need to fix this.
00:15:05.960 We're private.
00:15:08.380 All right, here's a persuasion lesson on spotting word salad.
00:15:14.240 Now, the way that word salad arises, usually, is from cognitive dissonance.
00:15:21.560 Cognitive dissonance arises from where somebody has a worldview that there sure is right, and then there's really solid evidence that it was never right.
00:15:33.540 Usually, people don't say, oh, wow, I've been wrong for so long, and now I have new information.
00:15:40.160 I completely revise my worldview to make it compatible with this new information, which looks solid.
00:15:46.840 Nobody does that.
00:15:48.580 Nobody does that.
00:15:50.780 All right?
00:15:51.020 What they do instead is they try to argue their old point that's been debunked, except there are no arguments, because the new information obliterates the arguments.
00:16:05.740 So what people will do typically, and not because they're dumb, this is very important.
00:16:11.980 This happens to smart people just as easily as anybody else.
00:16:16.540 They start talking in word salad.
00:16:18.660 So it's words that form sentences, but they're just complete nonsense.
00:16:24.440 And I'm going to give you an example so you can better recognize it in the wild.
00:16:28.840 So this is from Ricky Flores on Twitter.
00:16:33.700 He's responding to my calls for Jacob Chansley to be freed, based on the new video that totally destroys the narrative of January 6th.
00:16:43.660 But we all know there were violence there, that's not the part that's destroyed, just that the general character of the people there was protest and not insurrection, even though some were violent.
00:16:55.320 But Ricky, now evidently, and I say evidently because he's exhibiting the tell for cognitive dissonance, it means that the videos have just messed up his worldview.
00:17:06.200 Watch this answer.
00:17:07.720 Now he's responding to me, and he says, you don't get it, and you never will.
00:17:12.340 What's that?
00:17:12.840 You don't get it, and you never will.
00:17:16.280 That's an ad hominem.
00:17:18.540 Ad hominem.
00:17:19.680 Yeah.
00:17:20.020 If somebody starts with an ad hominem, usually there's a cognitive problem going on.
00:17:26.460 Because when people have reasons, they give the reason first.
00:17:32.220 It's not that people won't insult you.
00:17:35.480 Everybody insults everybody.
00:17:36.960 It's just sort of the way of the world.
00:17:37.960 But when people have a reason to really dunk on you, like, oh, apparently you're forgetting this data.
00:17:43.820 Boom.
00:17:44.660 And then they call you an idiot.
00:17:46.440 Or they might say, well, you're an idiot because of this data.
00:17:49.200 So it's not just the insult, right?
00:17:53.200 It's the insult without anything else.
00:17:55.660 All right.
00:17:57.140 So watch.
00:17:58.420 See if you think the insult gets backed up.
00:18:01.220 All right.
00:18:01.420 You don't get it, and you never will.
00:18:03.580 Access to the Capitol was closed off.
00:18:06.300 The formal affirmation of the will of the people attacked.
00:18:09.940 Law enforcement didn't know how to respond.
00:18:12.680 Never happened in history.
00:18:13.860 There was no playbook.
00:18:15.780 It was still insurrection.
00:18:18.480 Do any of those sentences have anything to do with the other sentences?
00:18:24.960 That's obvious word salad, right?
00:18:26.920 Do you recognize it?
00:18:28.580 Let me break it down again.
00:18:30.440 So here are the parts.
00:18:31.320 You don't get it, and you never will.
00:18:32.500 That's just ad hominem.
00:18:34.020 So we'll see if he backs it up with some kind of data or argument.
00:18:37.080 It says, access to the Capitol was closed off.
00:18:39.940 Check.
00:18:40.380 I know that.
00:18:40.940 The formal affirmation of the will of the people was attacked, meaning the verification
00:18:47.320 or the validation of the vote.
00:18:50.180 Now, is that the way real people talk?
00:18:53.580 Yeah, those people that day, they were attacking the formal affirmation of the will of the people.
00:19:00.900 Do you remember the part of the Constitution that specifies, whatever you do, don't attack
00:19:07.560 the formal affirmation of the will of the people.
00:19:10.940 Well, stay away from the formal affirmation of the will of the people.
00:19:16.180 So that's not, that's what they were there for.
00:19:20.100 They were there to stop the process.
00:19:23.680 Yes, everybody knows that.
00:19:25.720 So, so far, he's insulted me and told me two things that everybody knows.
00:19:29.920 Capitol was closed off, and they were there to stop that process.
00:19:33.420 Then he says, law enforcement didn't know how to respond.
00:19:36.640 Yes.
00:19:37.300 Never happened in history.
00:19:38.700 Yes.
00:19:39.300 There was no playbook.
00:19:40.540 Yes.
00:19:41.360 It was still an insurrection.
00:19:42.640 What?
00:19:44.120 What?
00:19:44.640 What did any of those sentences have to do with supporting that it was an insurrection?
00:19:49.120 He just started out by saying that they were there to attack the affirmation of the will
00:19:56.140 of the people.
00:19:57.800 Well, they were there to delay the day, which is exactly what they said, to make sure everything
00:20:03.820 got done right, if there was a way to check it.
00:20:06.020 So, have I made my case?
00:20:09.980 This is somebody who can put together sentences that are complex.
00:20:14.300 So, we would assume that Ricky has, he's smart.
00:20:18.500 I assume Ricky's smart, because he can put together complex sentences.
00:20:23.480 But, am I wrong that this is word salad?
00:20:28.360 It's actually just nonsense put together.
00:20:31.360 And that's what you look for.
00:20:32.620 You look for the nonsense sentences that are still perfectly well-constructed in terms
00:20:38.980 of grammar.
00:20:39.620 They're just weird.
00:20:42.040 All right.
00:20:44.320 Let's talk about this Silicon Valley bank.
00:20:47.820 So, as most of you know by now, big bank in Silicon Valley, a really big bank, has been
00:20:53.840 taken over by regulators because it's insolvent.
00:20:57.620 And a lot of people are going to lose their money, up to $250,000 per account.
00:21:04.060 That's guaranteed by the government.
00:21:06.500 But, so that's the basic idea.
00:21:08.340 Now, the big question is whether this is part of a, you know, some larger bank run that's
00:21:13.440 going to happen, or if it's a one-off.
00:21:15.600 The quick answer is it's probably a one-off, unless the public imagines it's not.
00:21:23.380 If the public imagines there's a problem, it does become a bank run.
00:21:29.520 If the public doesn't, then it probably won't.
00:21:35.900 Now, let me be very clear.
00:21:39.060 I do not give you financial advice.
00:21:42.660 Do not take my advice on what you should do with your money.
00:21:46.880 I will tell you what I'm doing.
00:21:50.880 Nothing.
00:21:53.100 Except I'm making sure that my accounts, to the degree that I can manage it, I make sure
00:21:59.480 that I don't have too many that are over that limit.
00:22:02.920 So, I might balance two accounts just to get them under that limit.
00:22:06.480 But that's all I would do.
00:22:08.320 Now, here's why.
00:22:10.400 Where would you put your money?
00:22:12.940 Where would you put it?
00:22:13.820 Like, where's the good place to put it?
00:22:18.100 I can't think of one.
00:22:21.920 Now, some people are saying gold and buy shorts and stuff like that.
00:22:28.320 But, you know, that's all just a different kind of risk.
00:22:34.300 Right?
00:22:34.900 So, what happens if I buy a bunch of gold, and it's probably already running up, and then
00:22:39.880 the banks don't fail?
00:22:40.920 Well, I got a bunch of gold that's going to start running back down because the banks
00:22:46.000 didn't fail.
00:22:47.080 So, that's just another risk.
00:22:49.680 Now, you could say, but the bank risk is I'll lose everything.
00:22:56.100 Now, if the big banks fail, it's not a bank problem.
00:23:01.920 I hate to tell you, but if the big banks all fail, or even just most of them or something,
00:23:09.560 that's the end of the game.
00:23:12.440 That's just sort of the end of the game.
00:23:15.200 You know, we're all dead, sort of thing.
00:23:17.120 So, I don't think it's going to happen.
00:23:18.360 So, I think the odds are the banks will take a hit, and then people will do what I did,
00:23:26.860 which is, what's Warren Buffett doing?
00:23:30.860 What's Warren Buffett doing?
00:23:32.760 Did Warren Buffett sell his Wells Fargo stock?
00:23:35.240 He has a ton of Wells Fargo stock, like a lot.
00:23:38.640 Did he sell his Wells Fargo stock?
00:23:40.140 If he doesn't, I'll probably, you know, trust Wells Fargo, because I don't know what's
00:23:47.560 going on, but I think he does.
00:23:49.840 I really don't know what's going on, but I think, you know, Berkshire Hathaway has a
00:23:55.200 better take on it than I do.
00:23:56.920 So, this is a case of the media will be trying to scare people, because they get, you know,
00:24:03.520 the extra clicks.
00:24:05.000 I watched Tucker last night.
00:24:07.240 I had to turn it off.
00:24:08.360 I was, he was just scaring me, but he was scaring me without a basis of facts.
00:24:16.300 You know, it was more like, it could be bad.
00:24:18.920 I get that, right?
00:24:20.880 Everything could be bad.
00:24:22.120 Everything could turn into a disaster, but the more you talk about it, the more you cause
00:24:27.240 it to happen, and so this is going to be sort of a battle for the minds of Americans and
00:24:32.820 others, I guess.
00:24:33.840 It's a battle for minds, and I'm going to be battling on the side.
00:24:38.360 And I hope that the so-called internet dads, the people who are, you know, at least can see
00:24:47.680 the field and are just in it for making the country better.
00:24:51.720 I'm hoping that the internet dads are on the same side, like, calm down, everything will
00:24:58.800 be fine.
00:24:59.420 It was a one-off.
00:25:00.560 There was something about that bank that wasn't like other banks.
00:25:04.360 I don't need to get into the details.
00:25:06.660 But the people who are closest to it see that as something that shouldn't affect other banks
00:25:11.820 unless you think it does.
00:25:14.280 If you think it affects the other banks, then it will, because people will act upon that
00:25:19.520 belief and start taking the money out and stuff.
00:25:22.600 But where are you going to put it?
00:25:24.200 Mattress?
00:25:25.900 I can't think of anything safe.
00:25:28.640 No idea.
00:25:31.080 I mean, I don't even know if buying stocks is a good idea.
00:25:35.000 Is it?
00:25:35.600 I don't know.
00:25:37.020 So don't take my advice about anything.
00:25:39.320 I'm going to be persuading toward calm, but that's not financial advice.
00:25:44.700 Do you get the difference?
00:25:46.280 That's not financial advice.
00:25:48.380 I'm just saying don't buy the degree of the scare.
00:25:54.220 Put it in context.
00:25:56.180 The context is that the media and social media will try to get you scared.
00:25:59.940 So everything looks scarier when the media talks about it.
00:26:06.400 That doesn't mean it won't go bad.
00:26:08.700 I've got to say that a hundred times.
00:26:10.520 I don't know which way things are going to go.
00:26:12.920 If I had to bet on it, well, I am betting on it.
00:26:17.180 I guess I am betting on it.
00:26:18.780 So yeah, I'm basically betting my entire fortune that we'll be okay.
00:26:23.480 I guess I am doing that.
00:26:24.760 I mean, we're all doing that, right?
00:26:26.820 But some people are betting their fortune that it won't be okay.
00:26:29.940 And they're taking their money out.
00:26:31.660 Now, the reason I think it'll be okay is because it has to be.
00:26:36.020 Does that make sense?
00:26:38.440 It has to be.
00:26:40.280 Like, whatever we have to do.
00:26:42.820 This is one of those situations where the government will do whatever it has to do.
00:26:46.840 Like, if they have to send in the military to stand in front of the bank, they'll do that.
00:26:51.360 Like, I don't think they'll do that.
00:26:53.060 But there's probably nothing they won't do.
00:26:55.960 They'll create money out of nothing.
00:26:57.680 They'll put people in jail for saying it's bad, which I don't approve of.
00:27:04.940 But when you get to the point where people will do whatever it takes, that's probably a safer place than you think.
00:27:12.820 Because everybody's going to be on the side of trying to keep the bank solvent.
00:27:16.960 There's nobody on the other side.
00:27:19.200 Like, maybe a few weird investors or something.
00:27:23.160 But basically, everybody wants the banks to survive.
00:27:26.960 So we'll do whatever it takes.
00:27:28.620 And people will jump through as many hoops as they need to make that work.
00:27:32.340 So I'm going to bet on humans this time.
00:27:36.200 Don't always.
00:27:37.580 But this time, I'm going to bet on the, you know, the Adam's Law of slow-moving disasters.
00:27:42.500 And I'm going to believe that this is slow enough.
00:27:47.960 It's not very slow.
00:27:49.920 But it might be slow enough that we can figure out how to, you know, crawl through it.
00:27:55.340 So I think we'll be okay.
00:27:57.580 But do not take my advice.
00:28:00.220 Okay?
00:28:05.100 All right.
00:28:09.700 So it's, of course, turned totally political.
00:28:14.700 So here's what the Democrats are saying.
00:28:16.840 They're saying that Peter Thiel, who once backed Trump, caused the whole thing.
00:28:22.300 It's all Peter Thiel's fault, according to some Democrats.
00:28:26.400 Because his Founders Fund apparently told its members to get their money out because the bank was not solvent.
00:28:35.860 Or soon would not be.
00:28:37.860 So I hate to say it, but this is one of the greatest calls Peter Thiel ever made.
00:28:42.480 And he at least got his own people's money out.
00:28:44.580 But the net effect of that might be crashing all banks.
00:28:48.520 Now, it's not, what he did is not immoral or unethical.
00:28:54.840 It's not.
00:28:55.940 It's a free market.
00:28:57.140 And smart people do what they need to do to protect themselves.
00:29:00.200 It's supposed to work that way.
00:29:02.000 But Democrats are using that as, you know, some ex, I think he's ex-mega.
00:29:08.020 Some ex-mega-looking guy caused it all because rich people are evil or something.
00:29:13.380 But the GOP has a different story, that it's all caused by Biden's inflationary spending, ESG, and maybe more.
00:29:26.860 So here's the argument for Biden inflation.
00:29:29.780 So most of you are not economists, so it's a little hard to understand the story.
00:29:35.920 But let's see if I can simplify it.
00:29:37.720 Banks make money by holding your deposits and paying you less interest rate than they make by using your money to make loans.
00:29:49.040 That's the simplest explanation.
00:29:52.040 But instead of making loans, which might be a good return for their money, and that would be more than they're paying, and then they'd be fine,
00:30:01.340 they took the government's advice and bought these low-interest rate, long-term federal instruments.
00:30:09.560 So they locked themselves into a low interest rate for their income,
00:30:13.820 while the price that they would have to pay for money was moving around and was obviously going to go up.
00:30:21.200 So in other words, the most basic thing a bank does,
00:30:25.200 which is make sure that the money they're paying to people is less than the money they're charging people,
00:30:30.180 they got that wrong.
00:30:35.320 They got that wrong.
00:30:37.060 Now part of it was they predicted wrong, right?
00:30:40.280 They predicted wrong that the interest rates would go up and then they would be locked in.
00:30:46.100 But who didn't know interest rates were going to go up?
00:30:49.220 Like who in the world didn't know that?
00:30:51.840 Everybody knew that.
00:30:53.220 We've been saying for years, and it's just math.
00:30:55.620 If you have enough spending, interest rates are going to go up, inflation, blah, blah, blah.
00:31:00.180 So I think if Biden causes inflation and then the bank did not manage their portfolio correctly in that environment,
00:31:09.980 is maybe a problem that other banks are not going to have.
00:31:15.500 My guess is Wells Fargo didn't do that.
00:31:19.040 Right?
00:31:19.240 My guess is Chase did not do that.
00:31:23.100 I'm pretty sure they didn't.
00:31:25.400 So they should be fine unless everybody panics.
00:31:29.800 Here's the argument for ESG.
00:31:32.040 So we know that the company was like big on signaling their awesome social stuff.
00:31:39.860 You think Yellen didn't know?
00:31:41.500 Well, that's another problem.
00:31:42.580 And if they were focusing on their ESG stuff,
00:31:50.700 were they looking backwards and looking in all the wrong places
00:31:56.200 when they should have been focusing on their banking?
00:31:59.560 So this is Vivek Ramaswamy is making this case.
00:32:03.800 Now, the case is we don't know.
00:32:05.460 We don't know if the ESG policies had an impact,
00:32:09.540 but we do know they were super focused on ESG,
00:32:12.560 which does not keep your bank solvent.
00:32:16.020 And the implication is maybe they should have focused a little bit more on quality.
00:32:21.140 For example, ESG says you want more diversity in your management and everywhere else.
00:32:27.120 So one thing to look at is did they hire unqualified people
00:32:33.320 because they needed diversity and they gave up some competence?
00:32:40.860 That's a really serious question that I'm not allowed to ask.
00:32:46.320 In theory, no matter what you think of anybody's qualities in any group,
00:32:53.980 even if everybody had the same training and competence,
00:33:00.780 like every person in the United States,
00:33:02.720 if you're working toward diversity,
00:33:05.080 you might run out of people because everybody's trying to be diverse.
00:33:09.020 You would run out of the best diverse hires.
00:33:14.560 And then you would naturally have to move down to the second tier
00:33:16.900 to manage your diversity.
00:33:19.420 It's like, oh, you know, Pepsi got all the good diversity hires.
00:33:24.620 But we still need some.
00:33:26.180 So we can't get the A-plus students.
00:33:28.760 And now we're getting the A-minus students.
00:33:30.980 Still good.
00:33:32.420 A-minus is fine.
00:33:34.060 And then you run out of A-minus students.
00:33:37.000 And you're still not diverse.
00:33:39.880 You got to go to B-plus.
00:33:42.080 You get some B-plus students, right?
00:33:44.220 Just talking generically here, not really students.
00:33:46.440 But you get the B-pluses.
00:33:48.500 And here's my question.
00:33:50.280 Do you want your money managed by a B-plus?
00:33:53.700 And again, it has nothing to do with the individuals.
00:33:58.240 I'm saying that math alone, you know, supply and demand,
00:34:03.780 there's an undersupply of people that are in high demand.
00:34:08.580 So in theory, the only way they can solve ESG and look good
00:34:12.300 is to go down to some B-plus competence.
00:34:16.680 And B-plus probably is not enough to keep your bank alive.
00:34:21.120 If you've got B-plus competence, you know, at the teller window,
00:34:25.420 you're probably fine.
00:34:28.080 But if your B-plus competence is managing the entire existence of your bank,
00:34:34.680 you know, maybe you need an A-minus.
00:34:36.740 Maybe you need an A-plus.
00:34:39.140 And again, it has nothing to do with any particular race.
00:34:43.080 It's just a supply and demand.
00:34:45.200 If you run out of supply, you got to go where you can get it,
00:34:49.040 and you're going to go down lower in the competence area.
00:34:52.040 There's no way around that.
00:34:53.000 That's just math.
00:34:53.940 It has nothing to do with race.
00:34:56.680 Or it has nothing to do with racial differences.
00:34:58.680 You would get the same result if you reversed all the races.
00:35:02.000 All right.
00:35:06.260 In the long run, that should work itself out.
00:35:08.020 But in the short run, it would cause distortions.
00:35:12.160 All right.
00:35:14.200 So I guess I hope the Internet dads win
00:35:16.620 and convince people to not go nuts today.
00:35:25.000 Yeah.
00:35:26.520 So Jim Cramer had a bad month.
00:35:28.380 You know, people like to dump on Jim Cramer.
00:35:32.260 He always, he recommends stocks.
00:35:34.640 And one of the things I always was amazed about him
00:35:37.060 is you could name any stock.
00:35:40.120 You know, people could call in and say,
00:35:41.640 what about A&B?
00:35:44.060 And Jim Cramer will say with total confidence,
00:35:46.920 A&B has good assets and balance sheet.
00:35:49.540 And then it'll tell you whether to buy them or hold them.
00:35:52.160 And I always thought, how does he do that?
00:35:55.280 There are like 10,000 stocks.
00:35:57.120 And people will just call with any stock,
00:35:59.640 and he can tell you the pros and cons of that stock.
00:36:03.400 Well, it turns out,
00:36:05.900 maybe he had some blind spots,
00:36:09.140 because he recommended people invest in Silicon Valley Bank
00:36:14.620 a few weeks before it went under.
00:36:16.860 Now, that, to be fair to Jim Cramer,
00:36:22.320 to be fair,
00:36:24.420 people who pick stocks and advise on stocks,
00:36:28.520 they usually don't know what's happening in a company.
00:36:31.320 Did you know that?
00:36:32.840 The experts, they usually don't know.
00:36:35.800 They really don't.
00:36:37.460 How would they know?
00:36:39.320 How would they know?
00:36:40.040 Like, even if they talk to the company,
00:36:44.060 do you think the company tells them the truth?
00:36:46.380 If Cramer has lunch with the CEO of a company,
00:36:50.120 is the CEO going to lean over and say,
00:36:52.020 you know, I've got to be honest,
00:36:53.940 our balance sheet looks good on paper,
00:36:56.700 but wait, in a month from now,
00:36:58.300 it's going to go right to the toilet.
00:37:00.400 Who do you talk to?
00:37:02.040 How could Jim Cramer possibly know anything about a company?
00:37:04.780 He only knows what they tell him.
00:37:08.580 And that's usually a lie,
00:37:10.700 because they're, you know, spinning things.
00:37:13.120 So his business model has a flaw
00:37:15.440 that people imagine that anybody can pick stocks accurately.
00:37:20.360 It's not actually even a thing.
00:37:22.700 It's not something that Cramer is doing poorly.
00:37:26.260 It's actually not a thing.
00:37:29.020 Does that make sense?
00:37:30.940 He's in the job of picking stocks
00:37:33.640 and picking individual stocks
00:37:35.840 and winning at it is not even a thing.
00:37:39.940 Ask Warren Buffett.
00:37:41.340 Hey, Warren Buffett,
00:37:42.580 do you think it's a good idea for individual investors
00:37:44.860 to pick individual stocks based on their own research
00:37:47.800 and maybe the advice of experts?
00:37:50.120 He would laugh at you.
00:37:52.020 Warren Buffett would laugh at you
00:37:53.820 for taking anybody's advice,
00:37:56.300 including your own,
00:37:57.980 on buying individual stocks.
00:37:59.660 He says that's a loser's game, basically.
00:38:02.280 That's what fools do.
00:38:03.640 So did Jim Cramer have a bad month
00:38:08.180 or is what he does impossible by definition?
00:38:13.260 Well, not definition,
00:38:14.460 but it's impossible in the real world.
00:38:17.920 So it's just sort of guessing in the end.
00:38:20.960 Yeah.
00:38:21.280 So I'm not sure he had a bad month.
00:38:23.020 I think he was doing something that isn't even possible,
00:38:25.520 and we should not be surprised
00:38:27.760 he didn't succeed this one time.
00:38:29.260 Yeah, I'm sure he's got lots of others wrong.
00:38:33.160 But of course, of course.
00:38:36.780 Somebody asked Elon Musk on Twitter
00:38:38.620 about buying the failed bank
00:38:42.040 and making it a digital bank.
00:38:44.620 Now, that's too big of a question for me
00:38:48.520 to know whether that's a good or bad idea.
00:38:50.240 Digital sounds crypto.
00:38:53.260 Crypto sounds risky.
00:38:55.460 So, you know, my bias is,
00:38:57.400 I don't see how that's going to work.
00:38:59.360 But Elon Musk replies,
00:39:01.800 I'm open to the idea.
00:39:04.000 Now, I don't think it was a joke.
00:39:06.240 I think he was actually open to the idea.
00:39:08.460 So that would be interesting.
00:39:09.640 Imagine if he could buy,
00:39:10.920 let's say, the intellectual property
00:39:12.580 of Silicon Valley Bank,
00:39:14.640 you know, the name and the corporation structure,
00:39:17.880 but not the debts.
00:39:20.640 You know, or not the assets or something.
00:39:25.700 I don't know.
00:39:25.960 I think you could do that.
00:39:27.140 Couldn't you?
00:39:28.660 I don't know.
00:39:29.360 So, but I wonder if there's anything there.
00:39:31.900 Maybe he has an idea
00:39:32.900 for making a digital bank work.
00:39:35.440 Seems like it's all going to be
00:39:36.620 digital money eventually.
00:39:38.640 Let me ask you this.
00:39:39.640 You don't believe
00:39:41.480 you don't believe
00:39:44.500 we'll be using, like, paper money
00:39:46.340 and checks
00:39:49.940 ten years from now, do you?
00:39:52.280 Do you think in ten years
00:39:53.460 we'll be using paper money
00:39:54.580 and writing paper checks?
00:39:57.700 It seems to me that digital money
00:39:59.460 is not a question.
00:40:01.220 It's just a guarantee.
00:40:04.280 Yeah.
00:40:05.020 You do.
00:40:06.080 So, the only reason
00:40:07.520 for keeping digital money
00:40:08.560 is for crime.
00:40:09.640 Am I wrong?
00:40:13.100 I guess you could say privacy.
00:40:16.660 But why do you need privacy
00:40:18.200 if you're not committing a crime?
00:40:21.900 Because it's not like your neighbors
00:40:23.300 are looking at your checking account.
00:40:25.120 It's only the government.
00:40:27.200 The government only cares
00:40:28.560 if you're committing a crime
00:40:29.700 as far as I know.
00:40:31.940 So, yeah.
00:40:33.520 Let me say this.
00:40:35.300 I'm not unambiguously
00:40:36.660 in favor of digital currency
00:40:38.320 because of all the tracking
00:40:39.480 and privacy.
00:40:40.020 I get that.
00:40:40.940 Like, it's creepy
00:40:41.800 and it probably will hurt us.
00:40:44.140 But it is also inevitable.
00:40:47.340 There's no way in the world
00:40:48.460 we're going to keep paper money
00:40:49.760 in the long term.
00:40:52.380 And there's no way in the world
00:40:53.560 we're going to be writing checks
00:40:54.740 in the long term.
00:40:56.460 That's just not going to happen.
00:40:57.520 So, it's one of these arguments
00:41:00.580 where if you're arguing
00:41:01.980 the pros and the cons
00:41:03.140 you're just talking.
00:41:04.780 Because it's not like
00:41:05.640 you're going to stop it.
00:41:07.200 You're not going to stop it.
00:41:08.480 It's just going to happen.
00:41:09.880 There's no way around it.
00:41:13.980 But some of you actually think
00:41:15.180 we'll have paper money
00:41:15.940 in 10 years.
00:41:16.860 If I said 20 years
00:41:18.160 do you think you'll still
00:41:19.040 have paper money?
00:41:19.700 I don't think there's a chance.
00:41:24.180 Yeah.
00:41:24.580 You do?
00:41:25.060 Okay.
00:41:25.780 Well, I mean,
00:41:26.660 I can't see the future.
00:41:28.260 So, maybe you're right.
00:41:29.580 But I'd be super surprised.
00:41:32.860 All right.
00:41:34.160 Speaking of Elon Musk's
00:41:35.700 future city plans,
00:41:38.400 somebody on Twitter said
00:41:39.420 that his brother Kimball
00:41:40.860 is investing in vertical farms
00:41:44.600 which would be an indoor farm,
00:41:46.100 I guess.
00:41:47.100 Is that true?
00:41:48.620 Kimball Musk is investing
00:41:50.380 in vertical farming,
00:41:52.100 indoor farming.
00:41:54.080 I think he follows me on,
00:41:56.800 I think Kimball follows me
00:41:58.260 on Twitter.
00:41:59.000 He tweeted at me the other day.
00:42:01.060 So, I'm going to ask him
00:42:02.220 about that because that's
00:42:03.000 one of my personal interests.
00:42:05.720 I also have a small investment
00:42:06.940 in indoor gardening
00:42:08.720 but smaller scale, obviously.
00:42:13.280 Democrats appear more lost
00:42:15.160 than usual but maybe it's just
00:42:16.540 because of the anecdotal stuff.
00:42:20.020 Representative Sylvia Garcia,
00:42:22.800 you remember she was grilling
00:42:24.320 Matt Taibbi and Michael Schellenberger.
00:42:28.740 And the ridiculousness
00:42:31.060 of her lack of preparation,
00:42:33.960 she believed that those two guys
00:42:36.160 were MAGA.
00:42:38.180 Like, that's not doing
00:42:39.040 any homework at all.
00:42:40.720 She didn't know they were
00:42:41.640 like legitimate,
00:42:42.360 she didn't know
00:42:44.160 they were journalists.
00:42:46.240 Now,
00:42:47.000 if you've been paying attention
00:42:48.840 for the past few years,
00:42:51.420 can you name anybody
00:42:52.460 who is a better journalist
00:42:53.720 than either one of them?
00:42:57.120 Like, who's beating them?
00:43:00.980 You know, Glenn Greenwald, maybe?
00:43:03.180 You know, Barry Weiss?
00:43:04.940 Yeah, Barry Weiss,
00:43:06.040 Glenn Greenwald.
00:43:06.600 But there's a very...
00:43:09.560 There are only maybe
00:43:10.580 ten journalists in the country
00:43:13.940 who are not absolute garbage.
00:43:16.380 Am I wrong?
00:43:17.960 There are probably ten good journalists
00:43:19.520 in the whole fucking country.
00:43:21.160 And they're right at the top
00:43:22.760 of the best journalists
00:43:24.820 in the whole country.
00:43:26.580 It's just crazy.
00:43:28.340 And Democrats don't even know it.
00:43:30.580 Like, they didn't even know their names.
00:43:32.500 It was crazy.
00:43:35.620 I mean, I'm not wrong.
00:43:36.680 There are only ten, like,
00:43:38.160 really useful journalists
00:43:40.480 in the country.
00:43:41.460 And they're definitely
00:43:42.360 in the top ten.
00:43:45.040 So, that's crazy.
00:43:50.420 And...
00:43:50.980 All right.
00:43:55.240 I'm going to show you
00:43:55.840 a couple of comics
00:43:56.740 that I did
00:43:57.440 for the locals
00:43:58.660 subscription group.
00:44:00.180 By the way,
00:44:00.980 the only place
00:44:01.840 you'll be able to see
00:44:02.780 Dilbert on Monday
00:44:04.500 of this coming week
00:44:06.000 will be on the locals
00:44:07.900 subscription site.
00:44:10.080 Five bucks a month
00:44:11.040 if you buy
00:44:11.440 an annual membership.
00:44:14.020 And for that,
00:44:14.840 you would see
00:44:15.200 not only the only
00:44:16.200 new Dilberts,
00:44:16.960 which will be called
00:44:17.580 Dilbert Reborn,
00:44:19.360 and it will be edgier
00:44:20.300 and spicier
00:44:21.000 because it's not
00:44:22.140 subject to the
00:44:24.200 editorial control
00:44:25.500 of newspapers.
00:44:26.560 Finally, I'm free.
00:44:28.480 And it also includes
00:44:29.920 my side comic
00:44:31.260 of Robots Read News
00:44:32.540 that I do once in a while
00:44:33.560 and also my micro-lessons,
00:44:36.420 which I'll be adding two.
00:44:37.360 I think I'll be adding
00:44:37.960 one today.
00:44:39.140 Over 200 micro-lessons,
00:44:40.720 two to four minutes.
00:44:41.860 Each one will give you
00:44:42.720 a life skill
00:44:43.540 that will change you forever.
00:44:46.200 Change you forever.
00:44:47.740 But...
00:44:48.420 And there's a lot more
00:44:49.500 on there.
00:44:51.120 Commentary, etc.
00:44:52.820 So, it's all the good stuff.
00:44:55.460 But here's some
00:44:56.100 Robots Read News
00:44:57.300 jokes that I read
00:44:58.240 that I wrote about
00:44:59.400 Silicon Valley Bank
00:45:00.380 before I realized
00:45:01.240 how bad it was.
00:45:02.620 I'm not sure I would have
00:45:03.660 written these jokes
00:45:04.660 when I had...
00:45:07.260 You know, it was sort of
00:45:07.820 when the news first broke.
00:45:09.660 But when you actually
00:45:10.380 think of the real-life
00:45:12.340 impact on real
00:45:13.700 citizens of the country,
00:45:15.940 some of whom
00:45:16.620 lost everything.
00:45:18.240 Like, it's not funny.
00:45:20.080 Right?
00:45:20.440 So, just to be clear,
00:45:22.580 it's not funny
00:45:23.640 what happened to the people
00:45:24.980 who lost their money.
00:45:26.260 You know, it's easy to say,
00:45:27.140 oh, you rich investors
00:45:28.420 lost some money,
00:45:29.380 blah, blah, blah.
00:45:30.080 But it's not all
00:45:30.980 rich investors.
00:45:32.240 Right?
00:45:32.520 There are real people
00:45:33.400 who just got killed in that.
00:45:35.580 But,
00:45:37.280 it doesn't mean
00:45:38.600 that there aren't
00:45:39.560 funny things to be said.
00:45:40.920 So, here on Robots Read News
00:45:42.600 where the robot
00:45:43.140 is always the same,
00:45:43.920 he never moves,
00:45:44.500 he just reads the news.
00:45:46.180 The first one I tried was,
00:45:47.600 and I wrote these
00:45:48.440 in concert with the
00:45:50.600 people and locals
00:45:52.240 who subscribe.
00:45:53.560 So, I was in my man cave
00:45:54.660 last night,
00:45:55.660 just turned it on,
00:45:56.540 and I had them
00:45:57.020 help me write these.
00:45:58.220 So, this is a combination
00:45:59.160 of my writing
00:46:00.140 plus suggestions
00:46:01.440 and input from them.
00:46:03.520 All right,
00:46:03.740 so the robot says,
00:46:04.680 Silicon Valley Bank
00:46:06.100 has been shut down
00:46:07.000 by regulators.
00:46:08.300 Their big mistake
00:46:09.220 was investing
00:46:10.060 all of their money
00:46:10.880 in saucer-shaped
00:46:12.260 weather balloons,
00:46:13.400 Nord Stream 2,
00:46:14.440 and Dilber NFTs.
00:46:16.480 Their only remaining assets
00:46:18.040 are Hunter Biden
00:46:19.040 paintings he made
00:46:19.920 with his penis.
00:46:20.500 So, that was
00:46:24.600 with the help
00:46:25.060 of the locals' people.
00:46:26.940 But then we thought
00:46:27.980 of another one
00:46:28.620 that seemed even funnier.
00:46:30.620 So, I just wrote
00:46:31.420 another one.
00:46:32.480 And that's the beauty
00:46:33.280 of Robots Read News.
00:46:34.840 I can crank one out
00:46:36.240 in 10 minutes
00:46:36.820 and have it published.
00:46:38.820 So, the robot says,
00:46:40.380 Silicon Valley Bank
00:46:41.320 has been shut down
00:46:42.160 by regulators.
00:46:43.500 In related news,
00:46:44.680 the Silicon Valley Sperm Bank
00:46:46.220 is also insolvent
00:46:47.320 because of a lack
00:46:49.440 of donor liquidity.
00:46:54.440 Lack of donor liquidity.
00:46:57.680 Well,
00:46:58.440 if I had all of my money
00:47:00.260 in Silicon Valley Bank,
00:47:02.540 I don't think I could,
00:47:04.260 I don't even think
00:47:05.760 I could jerk off.
00:47:08.600 And I could do that
00:47:09.580 when I've got the flu.
00:47:11.820 I could masturbate
00:47:13.000 when I have the flu.
00:47:14.240 But if I had all my money
00:47:16.060 in the Silicon Valley Bank,
00:47:17.800 I think I'd be,
00:47:19.120 I think my liquidity
00:47:20.540 would be drying up
00:47:21.440 pretty quickly.
00:47:22.900 So, anyway.
00:47:24.220 So, the,
00:47:25.100 here's a lesson
00:47:26.600 on writing a joke.
00:47:28.740 Here's a joke writing lesson.
00:47:29.880 I taught this to the,
00:47:30.720 to the locals' people
00:47:32.220 last night.
00:47:33.400 The, the punchline here
00:47:34.880 about the lack
00:47:36.060 of donor liquidity
00:47:37.040 requires you to do
00:47:38.980 an extra bit of thinking
00:47:40.420 on your own.
00:47:41.700 So, instead of just
00:47:42.540 giving you the punchline,
00:47:43.500 here it is, ha ha,
00:47:44.340 I give you the punchline
00:47:46.300 and you go,
00:47:46.900 what's he mean by that?
00:47:48.300 Oh, I get it.
00:47:49.740 And it's that little bit of
00:47:50.900 what's he mean?
00:47:52.320 Yeah, like the people
00:47:53.600 are so upset
00:47:54.220 they're dehydrated
00:47:55.120 and they can't function
00:47:56.100 and stuff.
00:47:57.080 So, it takes you
00:47:57.940 just a little bit of time,
00:48:00.080 a little bit of time
00:48:01.600 to like connect the dots
00:48:03.420 and that's what makes it funny.
00:48:05.220 It's that little time
00:48:06.080 that connected the dots.
00:48:08.140 So, that's your lesson.
00:48:09.460 Now, I promise you
00:48:10.540 I'd give you another lesson.
00:48:12.020 So, you learn about
00:48:12.880 word salad
00:48:14.020 and how to write a joke
00:48:15.020 and now you're going to
00:48:15.620 learn how to spot an NPC.
00:48:17.900 The NPCs are so consistent
00:48:19.680 that I started making a list
00:48:21.460 of the things they say
00:48:23.040 so you can spot them too.
00:48:25.060 Here are things
00:48:25.880 that NPCs say
00:48:27.140 that identify them
00:48:28.740 as NPCs
00:48:29.700 and you can just ignore them
00:48:31.360 from that point on.
00:48:32.640 It makes them funny.
00:48:33.900 So, this is kind of a reframe.
00:48:36.360 If you think your critics
00:48:37.860 are well-meaning citizens
00:48:40.400 who have a bad feeling
00:48:41.520 about you
00:48:42.120 that's going to make
00:48:43.540 you feel bad.
00:48:44.680 I hate it when citizens
00:48:45.880 have a bad feeling
00:48:46.800 about me.
00:48:47.500 I don't like it at all.
00:48:49.240 But, if I knew that
00:48:50.520 the person who was
00:48:51.340 criticizing me
00:48:52.200 was an NPC
00:48:54.040 and not a player
00:48:55.100 I'd say
00:48:55.840 oh, okay
00:48:56.460 that's just
00:48:56.980 background scenery.
00:48:59.500 So, here are some things
00:49:00.680 to recognize
00:49:01.300 the background scenery
00:49:02.400 of an NPC.
00:49:04.480 You're just an apologist.
00:49:07.860 Okay.
00:49:09.500 Well, maybe I just
00:49:10.400 have an opinion.
00:49:12.300 Maybe I just have
00:49:13.300 a different opinion.
00:49:14.660 How about that?
00:49:15.860 How about I think
00:49:16.660 differently than you do?
00:49:17.940 Maybe that's the entire story.
00:49:19.860 Maybe I'm not
00:49:20.440 an apologist.
00:49:22.080 Or how about
00:49:22.560 you're a fence sitter.
00:49:23.960 You're a racist.
00:49:25.660 Keep digging.
00:49:26.940 Walking it back.
00:49:28.680 Flip-flopping.
00:49:29.980 And then my two favorites.
00:49:31.480 You're afraid of
00:49:32.560 whatever.
00:49:34.340 The mind reading.
00:49:35.800 You're afraid of
00:49:37.120 what you really think is
00:49:41.020 no, I said
00:49:42.980 what I really think.
00:49:44.880 Or, I saw the video
00:49:46.680 there is no other way
00:49:47.920 to interpret it.
00:49:50.440 Yeah, there's another way
00:49:51.620 to interpret it.
00:49:52.760 It's edited
00:49:53.360 to reverse the meaning.
00:49:55.220 That's the other way.
00:49:56.580 Pretty easy.
00:49:57.760 It didn't take any work
00:49:58.960 at all.
00:50:00.220 Or how about
00:50:00.860 you said
00:50:02.440 all of the people
00:50:03.420 in that group.
00:50:04.100 When you said
00:50:05.760 black people
00:50:06.340 like hip-hop music,
00:50:07.760 you were saying
00:50:08.600 all of them
00:50:09.320 and that's racist.
00:50:11.060 No, no.
00:50:12.020 Nobody means all of them.
00:50:13.760 No matter what they say,
00:50:15.060 they never mean all of them.
00:50:16.640 Doesn't mean
00:50:17.180 just black people.
00:50:18.440 Doesn't mean
00:50:18.920 just MAGA people.
00:50:20.100 It's never all of them.
00:50:21.840 It's never,
00:50:22.780 ever all of them.
00:50:24.240 Only NPCs say that.
00:50:25.980 And, you're only doing
00:50:29.580 this for clicks.
00:50:30.880 This is what I'm getting now.
00:50:33.360 So, you know,
00:50:34.180 I'm saying some more
00:50:35.020 provocative thing
00:50:35.960 in the minds
00:50:36.800 of other people.
00:50:37.880 And they're saying
00:50:38.380 you're just doing it
00:50:39.120 for clicks.
00:50:40.760 That's a little
00:50:41.700 lacking all the variables.
00:50:45.600 There are more variables
00:50:46.840 than clicks.
00:50:48.600 But the NPCs
00:50:49.760 can handle
00:50:50.100 one variable at a time.
00:50:51.380 So that's how you spot them.
00:50:52.120 All right.
00:50:55.620 Here's some of the
00:50:56.720 imaginary problems
00:50:58.200 that Democrats
00:50:58.720 are working about.
00:51:01.700 The Democrats
00:51:03.660 are very worked up
00:51:04.700 about two imaginary
00:51:05.780 MAGA guys,
00:51:07.620 Matt Taibbi
00:51:08.300 and Michael Schellenberger.
00:51:10.380 They're imaginary.
00:51:11.960 Now, the people exist,
00:51:14.060 but they've never been
00:51:15.480 associated with MAGA.
00:51:18.620 But the Democrats
00:51:20.220 want to get rid
00:51:20.800 of those MAGA guys
00:51:22.020 that don't exist.
00:51:25.020 Biden is talking out
00:51:27.000 against the imaginary
00:51:27.960 GOP plan
00:51:29.860 to defund the police,
00:51:31.240 which, as you know,
00:51:32.720 not only doesn't exist,
00:51:34.620 it's the literal opposite
00:51:35.840 of the GOP opinion,
00:51:37.540 which is,
00:51:38.500 let's fund those police
00:51:39.260 some more.
00:51:40.400 But the Democrats
00:51:41.600 have an imaginary
00:51:42.800 task there to beat.
00:51:45.060 And then they're working
00:51:46.140 on the imaginary
00:51:46.980 insurrection led
00:51:47.800 by the imaginary
00:51:48.520 bad guy,
00:51:49.280 QAnon Shaman.
00:51:50.280 Do Republicans
00:51:54.540 work on that many
00:51:55.740 imaginary problems?
00:51:58.800 Like, does it work
00:51:59.840 both ways?
00:52:01.160 It might.
00:52:02.540 It might.
00:52:03.160 It might work
00:52:03.900 both ways.
00:52:04.960 But I'm only noticing
00:52:06.840 it on one side.
00:52:07.680 I feel like when
00:52:10.840 Republicans complain
00:52:15.620 about something,
00:52:17.280 they might be
00:52:18.160 exaggerating it.
00:52:19.960 Would that be fair?
00:52:21.220 Because in politics,
00:52:22.120 everybody exaggerates
00:52:23.020 everything.
00:52:24.080 So probably
00:52:24.780 some exaggeration.
00:52:26.560 But do the Republicans
00:52:27.780 fight imaginary problems?
00:52:29.520 is that a thing?
00:52:32.940 And, well,
00:52:33.800 I guess they do.
00:52:35.340 Yeah, I guess they do.
00:52:36.140 If it's based
00:52:37.680 on a conspiracy theory.
00:52:40.000 But if it's not
00:52:40.840 based on a conspiracy
00:52:41.800 theory,
00:52:43.640 like,
00:52:43.860 it's just the news,
00:52:46.260 do Republicans
00:52:47.460 hallucinate
00:52:48.160 just ordinary news?
00:52:51.260 Oh,
00:52:51.900 it feels like
00:52:52.580 there's a difference.
00:52:55.160 All right,
00:52:55.340 here's another story.
00:52:56.080 Oh,
00:52:59.180 I like this quote
00:53:00.060 by H.L. Mencken.
00:53:01.200 I saw
00:53:01.360 Nathaniel
00:53:02.800 Eliasson
00:53:03.980 tweeted this.
00:53:06.500 The whole,
00:53:06.940 this is a quote,
00:53:07.840 the whole aim
00:53:08.400 of practical politics
00:53:09.660 is to keep
00:53:10.660 the populace
00:53:11.360 alarmed
00:53:11.880 and hence
00:53:12.860 clamorous
00:53:13.700 to be led
00:53:14.400 to safety
00:53:15.300 by menacing it
00:53:16.660 with endless series
00:53:17.600 of hobgoblins,
00:53:18.940 all of them
00:53:19.520 imaginary.
00:53:22.180 That feels,
00:53:22.960 that feels like
00:53:24.360 politics, right?
00:53:25.080 That all of our
00:53:26.620 problems
00:53:27.080 that are surfaced,
00:53:29.140 it's not all
00:53:29.820 of our problems,
00:53:30.480 but the ones
00:53:30.840 that are surfaced
00:53:31.520 in politics
00:53:32.100 are imaginary.
00:53:33.880 It's an imaginary
00:53:34.700 threat from over there
00:53:35.880 and we better
00:53:36.300 attack them.
00:53:37.760 Probably true.
00:53:39.420 Pretty imaginary.
00:53:41.340 All right,
00:53:41.800 this is a surprise
00:53:43.220 in the news.
00:53:44.820 China
00:53:45.240 brokered a deal
00:53:46.240 between Saudi Arabia
00:53:47.320 and Iran
00:53:47.940 to
00:53:49.120 reopen
00:53:50.600 diplomatic
00:53:51.320 connections,
00:53:52.120 but that's not
00:53:52.560 the big part.
00:53:53.100 the big part
00:53:54.780 is
00:53:55.160 they
00:53:55.660 broke it
00:53:56.560 at an end
00:53:57.000 to the Yemen
00:53:57.880 civil war.
00:53:59.320 Or not an end
00:53:59.920 to it,
00:54:00.220 but that
00:54:00.740 Iran would
00:54:02.020 stop backing
00:54:02.800 the
00:54:03.240 Houthi rebels
00:54:04.920 that were
00:54:05.280 attacking
00:54:05.680 Saudi Arabia.
00:54:07.480 That's like
00:54:08.060 a big deal,
00:54:08.840 isn't it?
00:54:10.580 That
00:54:10.920 Saudi Arabia
00:54:13.180 and Iran
00:54:13.660 can talk again.
00:54:14.920 And the reason
00:54:15.640 they can talk
00:54:16.420 is that China
00:54:17.620 helped them
00:54:18.080 solve a war.
00:54:18.760 I mean,
00:54:21.720 I hate to say
00:54:22.840 good job
00:54:23.540 China,
00:54:24.760 but that
00:54:25.920 was a good
00:54:26.380 job.
00:54:27.200 And I think
00:54:27.700 that China
00:54:28.080 probably used
00:54:28.700 their economic
00:54:29.280 clout on both
00:54:30.220 countries,
00:54:30.700 right?
00:54:31.380 Because Iran
00:54:32.180 needs to sell
00:54:33.060 to China.
00:54:33.940 I assume
00:54:34.460 the Saudis
00:54:34.940 do.
00:54:36.540 So that
00:54:38.040 was just
00:54:38.420 good work.
00:54:40.600 It's weird.
00:54:41.540 I mean,
00:54:41.740 I don't want
00:54:41.980 to say
00:54:42.200 something bad
00:54:42.800 about it,
00:54:43.220 but it looks
00:54:43.940 like good
00:54:44.360 work
00:54:44.740 to me.
00:54:46.080 And I
00:54:47.200 don't know
00:54:47.480 if Iran
00:54:47.900 is more
00:54:48.480 or less
00:54:48.980 dangerous
00:54:49.500 if they
00:54:50.220 get along
00:54:50.640 with Saudi
00:54:51.100 Arabia.
00:54:52.140 But maybe
00:54:52.880 less.
00:54:54.280 Maybe.
00:54:55.500 Now,
00:54:55.820 I suppose
00:54:56.160 we could
00:54:56.500 argue,
00:54:56.980 oh,
00:54:57.180 we need
00:54:57.500 Saudi
00:54:57.780 Arabia
00:54:58.080 to be
00:54:58.420 tough
00:54:58.680 on Iran
00:54:59.180 with us.
00:55:02.040 But it's
00:55:02.660 also possible
00:55:03.440 that Iran
00:55:04.200 has decided
00:55:04.820 that being
00:55:05.800 adventurous
00:55:06.300 is not
00:55:06.880 working for
00:55:07.420 them.
00:55:08.000 It's possible.
00:55:09.780 So I guess
00:55:10.540 it's too early
00:55:11.140 in this story
00:55:11.660 to know if
00:55:12.120 this is good
00:55:12.600 or bad.
00:55:13.600 But I'm
00:55:14.820 going to give
00:55:15.100 Trident credit.
00:55:16.080 Got to give
00:55:16.480 China credit.
00:55:17.460 Nobody's a
00:55:17.940 bigger critic.
00:55:18.980 But that looked
00:55:19.780 like a smart
00:55:20.560 and just a
00:55:21.400 business thing
00:55:21.940 to do.
00:55:22.720 Now,
00:55:22.940 the one thing
00:55:23.360 that I'm
00:55:23.800 always impressed
00:55:24.500 about Saudi
00:55:25.340 Arabia,
00:55:26.640 especially with
00:55:27.400 their new
00:55:27.720 leader,
00:55:28.540 when he's
00:55:29.200 not cutting
00:55:29.680 up people
00:55:30.140 with a
00:55:30.400 bone saw,
00:55:31.800 he seems
00:55:32.280 to be a
00:55:33.260 real practical
00:55:34.020 business person,
00:55:35.360 the crown prince
00:55:36.300 of Saudi Arabia.
00:55:37.640 It seems like
00:55:38.480 he's a negotiator,
00:55:39.440 a dealmaker.
00:55:41.220 You know,
00:55:41.460 you could
00:55:41.780 criticize him
00:55:42.660 for all the
00:55:44.460 other things
00:55:44.940 that you don't
00:55:45.280 like.
00:55:46.080 That's fine.
00:55:47.040 But he does
00:55:47.700 seem to be a
00:55:48.200 dealmaker.
00:55:49.580 So that's a
00:55:51.020 positive thing.
00:55:54.100 All right.
00:55:55.060 Well,
00:55:55.540 that,
00:55:55.800 ladies and
00:55:56.080 gentlemen,
00:55:56.480 is all I
00:55:57.100 needed to say
00:55:57.700 today.
00:55:58.220 But I said
00:55:58.900 to remind me
00:56:00.540 something about
00:56:01.180 equity.
00:56:01.720 let's see.
00:56:06.980 Okay.
00:56:09.140 Here it is.
00:56:11.480 You ready for
00:56:12.040 this?
00:56:16.740 When black
00:56:17.940 Americans
00:56:18.500 focused on
00:56:21.520 sports,
00:56:23.700 let's say
00:56:24.120 when it was
00:56:24.860 finally allowed
00:56:27.240 that black
00:56:27.760 athletes could
00:56:28.480 fully compete,
00:56:29.360 would you
00:56:30.460 agree that
00:56:30.940 they ended
00:56:31.260 up dominating
00:56:31.920 sports?
00:56:33.500 Maybe not
00:56:34.000 every sport,
00:56:35.360 but, you
00:56:35.720 know,
00:56:35.800 some of
00:56:36.140 our major
00:56:36.480 sports.
00:56:38.080 I would say
00:56:38.500 so.
00:56:38.820 As a percentage
00:56:40.180 of the population,
00:56:41.300 I would say
00:56:41.580 they dominated.
00:56:42.940 When black
00:56:45.280 Americans invented
00:56:46.260 hip-hop,
00:56:48.880 wouldn't you
00:56:49.340 agree that,
00:56:50.040 at least for
00:56:50.520 young people,
00:56:51.940 it's the
00:56:52.400 dominant form
00:56:53.140 of music?
00:56:53.620 So they
00:56:55.920 focused on
00:56:56.420 music and
00:56:57.000 they dominated.
00:56:59.300 Would you
00:56:59.580 agree that
00:57:00.400 black people
00:57:01.140 are more
00:57:01.480 fashionable than
00:57:02.340 white people?
00:57:03.840 I'm not even
00:57:04.400 going to listen
00:57:04.800 to your answer.
00:57:05.380 The answer is
00:57:05.820 yes.
00:57:07.240 Yes.
00:57:09.440 Like,
00:57:10.160 you play this
00:57:12.060 game,
00:57:12.520 go out in
00:57:12.900 public,
00:57:13.500 if you're a
00:57:14.280 generic white
00:57:14.860 guy in khakis,
00:57:16.020 right?
00:57:16.700 Like,
00:57:17.120 play this game.
00:57:18.400 Walk around
00:57:18.820 in public where
00:57:20.260 there's a mix
00:57:20.880 of people and
00:57:22.120 find any black
00:57:23.260 guy who is
00:57:24.540 dressed less
00:57:25.520 fashionably than
00:57:26.460 you are.
00:57:28.620 Good luck.
00:57:30.000 Good luck.
00:57:30.640 I mean,
00:57:30.840 it might be a
00:57:31.320 tie in some
00:57:32.020 cases,
00:57:33.140 but,
00:57:34.220 yeah.
00:57:34.760 Yeah.
00:57:35.620 Now,
00:57:36.880 now,
00:57:39.320 the big
00:57:39.680 problem is
00:57:40.940 that you
00:57:41.660 don't see
00:57:42.240 black America
00:57:43.220 making as
00:57:44.460 much money,
00:57:45.880 right?
00:57:46.400 And some
00:57:47.040 of that is
00:57:47.440 lack of
00:57:48.200 access to
00:57:48.760 education,
00:57:49.360 et cetera.
00:57:51.000 Systemic
00:57:51.520 racism,
00:57:52.180 blah,
00:57:52.340 blah,
00:57:52.460 blah.
00:57:52.560 But here's
00:57:53.640 what I also
00:57:54.220 can't help
00:57:55.980 but notice.
00:57:57.600 It's also
00:57:58.280 not a focus.
00:58:00.340 Am I
00:58:00.900 wrong?
00:58:04.460 Am I
00:58:05.060 wrong to
00:58:05.420 say that
00:58:05.980 black America,
00:58:07.800 I lost the
00:58:08.480 connection on
00:58:09.000 locals?
00:58:09.800 Locals'
00:58:10.300 fee just
00:58:10.660 died.
00:58:12.520 Huh.
00:58:13.760 I might
00:58:14.380 have to
00:58:14.880 quit it
00:58:16.260 and restart
00:58:16.680 it?
00:58:17.840 Looks like
00:58:18.480 it's dead.
00:58:20.260 See what
00:58:20.640 happens if
00:58:21.260 I do
00:58:24.100 this.
00:58:28.980 I don't
00:58:30.900 know.
00:58:31.400 Let's see
00:58:31.960 if I can
00:58:32.260 fix a little
00:58:32.980 technical problem
00:58:33.620 here.
00:58:34.600 There's probably
00:58:35.180 so much traffic
00:58:35.980 on locals.
00:58:37.440 I'm driving
00:58:38.220 a lot of
00:58:38.560 traffic to
00:58:39.000 locals.
00:58:41.060 All right,
00:58:41.360 I don't know
00:58:41.800 if they can
00:58:42.200 see.
00:58:42.700 I can't see
00:58:43.160 their comments,
00:58:44.360 so it might
00:58:45.300 be just a
00:58:45.720 comment problem.
00:58:46.280 All right,
00:58:47.760 so to
00:58:48.080 finish my
00:58:48.560 point,
00:58:49.300 black America
00:58:49.880 focused on
00:58:50.860 sports when
00:58:51.600 they were
00:58:51.840 allowed to
00:58:52.660 fully participate.
00:58:54.040 They
00:58:54.320 dominate.
00:58:55.120 Focus on
00:58:55.840 music?
00:58:56.900 Dominate.
00:58:57.780 Focus on
00:58:58.400 fashion?
00:58:59.540 Dominate.
00:59:00.900 Do they
00:59:01.260 focus on
00:59:02.120 making money
00:59:03.220 in the
00:59:05.120 normal economy
00:59:05.860 way and
00:59:06.600 going to
00:59:06.980 college?
00:59:08.120 I don't
00:59:08.940 see it.
00:59:10.040 Do you?
00:59:10.360 So here's
00:59:13.120 my question.
00:59:15.380 Why don't
00:59:16.200 black Americans
00:59:17.940 understand that
00:59:19.140 every time they
00:59:19.760 focused on
00:59:20.360 something,
00:59:20.800 they dominate
00:59:21.240 it?
00:59:22.740 If black
00:59:23.640 America took
00:59:24.380 my advice,
00:59:25.580 which it
00:59:26.000 won't,
00:59:27.080 on how to
00:59:28.020 succeed,
00:59:30.100 basically just
00:59:30.900 a normal
00:59:31.940 toolkit that
00:59:33.000 everybody uses
00:59:33.740 when they
00:59:34.160 succeed.
00:59:35.120 Nothing special
00:59:36.060 for black or
00:59:36.860 white people.
00:59:37.560 It's just the
00:59:38.100 basics of how
00:59:39.460 anybody succeeds.
00:59:40.360 If black
00:59:42.500 America focused
00:59:43.440 on the basics
00:59:44.220 of how to
00:59:44.680 succeed,
00:59:46.040 they would
00:59:47.340 dominate
00:59:47.760 business.
00:59:49.880 They would
00:59:50.180 dominate.
00:59:51.240 And the
00:59:51.520 reason is that
00:59:52.060 the white
00:59:52.320 people aren't
00:59:52.720 doing that.
00:59:53.740 Now white
00:59:54.040 people get
00:59:54.520 more accidental
00:59:55.920 exposure to
00:59:56.740 the techniques
00:59:57.340 because there
00:59:58.100 are more
00:59:58.340 successful people
00:59:59.180 in their
00:59:59.460 community,
01:00:00.120 statistically.
01:00:02.120 But there's
01:00:03.980 some kind of
01:00:04.520 weird assumption
01:00:05.240 that systemic
01:00:08.500 racism is
01:00:09.360 holding black
01:00:10.120 America back.
01:00:11.920 And of
01:00:12.360 course it
01:00:12.660 is.
01:00:13.340 That's a
01:00:14.000 fact.
01:00:15.120 But how
01:00:16.220 much?
01:00:17.700 How much?
01:00:18.920 Because wasn't
01:00:20.220 there systemic
01:00:20.860 racism in all
01:00:21.840 the things I
01:00:22.340 mentioned?
01:00:23.580 Was there not
01:00:24.460 systemic racism
01:00:25.580 in sports even
01:00:26.560 when it was
01:00:27.080 legal for
01:00:28.720 everybody to
01:00:29.440 participate?
01:00:30.920 There must have
01:00:31.400 been a ton.
01:00:32.440 There must have
01:00:32.860 been a ton of
01:00:33.420 it.
01:00:34.200 And they
01:00:34.620 dominated.
01:00:35.880 Fashion, music,
01:00:36.940 still dominated.
01:00:39.180 So why do
01:00:42.000 you imagine
01:00:43.160 that focusing
01:00:44.460 on something
01:00:45.320 else, tools
01:00:46.680 for success,
01:00:47.440 would not make
01:00:47.940 them dominate the
01:00:48.700 economy as well?
01:00:50.580 Now here's the
01:00:52.360 thing that if
01:00:53.540 you want to go
01:00:54.020 racist, you
01:00:55.000 could say,
01:00:55.400 oh, Steve
01:00:56.960 Jobs was
01:00:57.900 white and
01:00:58.740 Bill Gates
01:00:59.760 was white and
01:01:00.600 so the big
01:01:03.200 billionaire,
01:01:04.000 successful people,
01:01:05.100 blah, blah, blah.
01:01:06.020 Well, you're
01:01:06.960 not one of
01:01:07.440 those.
01:01:09.020 You're not
01:01:09.420 one of those.
01:01:10.620 Most people
01:01:11.180 are just
01:01:11.480 normal people
01:01:12.100 with jobs.
01:01:14.020 In the real
01:01:15.120 world of
01:01:15.720 normal people
01:01:16.360 with jobs,
01:01:17.040 you know,
01:01:17.260 99% of the
01:01:18.240 world, and
01:01:18.820 job would be
01:01:19.560 small business
01:01:20.280 as well,
01:01:21.440 people aren't
01:01:23.140 that different.
01:01:24.700 Right?
01:01:25.740 I know I'm
01:01:27.160 different from
01:01:28.000 Elon Musk and
01:01:29.080 Bill Gates and
01:01:30.280 Steve Jobs.
01:01:31.960 Like, I see
01:01:33.040 them operating
01:01:33.720 on a level
01:01:34.340 that I can
01:01:35.620 barely understand.
01:01:37.540 But normal
01:01:38.340 people with
01:01:40.800 normal educations
01:01:42.020 and normal
01:01:43.800 access to
01:01:44.840 skills,
01:01:46.520 some will do
01:01:48.760 better if
01:01:49.260 they're trained
01:01:50.020 to do the
01:01:50.620 right things
01:01:51.180 than the
01:01:51.480 people who
01:01:51.820 weren't trained.
01:01:53.100 Black America
01:01:53.900 is shooting
01:01:54.480 low.
01:01:56.820 If you say,
01:01:58.260 do you know
01:01:58.920 any white
01:01:59.780 family that
01:02:00.840 says, go out
01:02:02.080 there and try
01:02:03.020 to be
01:02:03.580 equitable.
01:02:06.000 Scott, I'd
01:02:07.720 like you to
01:02:08.120 work hard, and
01:02:09.120 if you do a
01:02:09.620 good job, you
01:02:10.240 could be
01:02:10.620 average.
01:02:12.340 My mother
01:02:13.040 literally told
01:02:13.900 me, I don't
01:02:14.820 care what you
01:02:15.340 do, just do
01:02:15.820 it better than
01:02:16.260 other people.
01:02:18.400 Like, literally
01:02:19.340 all the time.
01:02:21.580 Doesn't matter
01:02:22.080 what you do,
01:02:23.000 you know, you
01:02:23.260 have to follow
01:02:23.820 your own
01:02:25.520 dreams, so I
01:02:26.540 don't care what
01:02:27.080 you do, but
01:02:28.100 you have to do
01:02:28.600 it better than
01:02:29.100 other people.
01:02:30.040 That's the
01:02:30.500 whole game.
01:02:32.640 Now, who
01:02:34.480 tells that to
01:02:35.300 black young
01:02:36.560 kids?
01:02:38.100 All right, you're
01:02:38.840 going to be in
01:02:39.220 an economy, I
01:02:40.800 don't care what
01:02:41.320 you do, it
01:02:42.080 should be
01:02:42.320 legal, I
01:02:43.360 don't care what
01:02:43.780 you do, but
01:02:44.800 you've got to
01:02:45.160 do it better
01:02:45.600 than other
01:02:45.980 people.
01:02:48.880 And now,
01:02:49.720 black America
01:02:50.280 is being taught
01:02:50.980 to try to be
01:02:52.160 average, when
01:02:53.940 every time they
01:02:54.580 focus, they've
01:02:55.340 dominated.
01:02:56.740 I'm not
01:02:57.420 wrong, nobody's
01:02:59.880 disagreeing with
01:03:00.480 me.
01:03:01.840 People who
01:03:02.600 focus get what
01:03:03.700 they want, right?
01:03:05.140 You can see it
01:03:05.960 within one
01:03:06.660 person's job.
01:03:08.500 Forget about a
01:03:09.440 population of
01:03:10.140 people, any one
01:03:11.500 person.
01:03:12.520 If they focus on
01:03:14.340 one area, they
01:03:16.480 exceed.
01:03:17.720 They will do
01:03:18.780 better than the
01:03:19.300 people who didn't
01:03:19.800 focus on that
01:03:20.500 area.
01:03:21.020 At the same
01:03:21.540 time, they'll do
01:03:22.120 less good in the
01:03:22.940 areas they're not
01:03:23.480 focusing on.
01:03:24.080 Very normal
01:03:25.320 thing.
01:03:27.180 Now, let me
01:03:27.860 talk to Zephyr.
01:03:28.760 So, Zephyr says
01:03:29.520 you're delusional,
01:03:30.400 Scott.
01:03:31.220 Are you
01:03:31.620 disagreeing that
01:03:32.440 focus is
01:03:33.920 important to
01:03:34.480 success?
01:03:35.260 Is that the
01:03:35.820 point you're
01:03:36.180 disagreeing with?
01:03:37.920 Or do you
01:03:38.640 believe that it's
01:03:39.440 not enough?
01:03:43.360 You think it's
01:03:44.140 reaching?
01:03:45.840 See, I think
01:03:46.400 you have to live
01:03:47.600 with this idea
01:03:48.220 for a little
01:03:49.020 bit.
01:03:50.040 Because it's so
01:03:51.700 far outside the
01:03:52.460 box.
01:03:52.800 It's a
01:03:53.820 reframe.
01:03:55.220 So, the
01:03:55.840 reframe is that
01:03:56.920 that which you
01:03:57.700 focused on, you
01:04:00.000 succeeded.
01:04:01.260 Do you think
01:04:01.860 there were any
01:04:02.320 black people who
01:04:03.560 went into sports,
01:04:05.140 again, thinking
01:04:05.980 about the time
01:04:06.640 when the rights
01:04:08.940 were just being
01:04:09.840 equalized?
01:04:12.020 Do you think
01:04:12.660 there were any
01:04:12.960 black people who
01:04:13.740 went into sports
01:04:14.360 and said, I'm
01:04:15.640 going to practice
01:04:16.140 hard and try to
01:04:17.260 be an average
01:04:17.940 player?
01:04:19.480 Or did they all
01:04:20.760 say, I think I
01:04:22.100 have a practice
01:04:22.760 hard.
01:04:23.000 I could be one
01:04:23.460 of the best.
01:04:24.340 And then they
01:04:24.800 were.
01:04:26.080 And do you
01:04:26.780 think when
01:04:27.560 Ye got into
01:04:28.760 fashion, just to
01:04:29.860 pick a specific,
01:04:31.260 do you think Ye
01:04:31.880 got into fashion
01:04:32.660 because he wanted
01:04:33.300 to be just
01:04:33.740 average?
01:04:34.840 I think I could
01:04:35.680 be the average
01:04:36.380 of other designers.
01:04:38.260 Clearly not.
01:04:40.120 Clearly, he got
01:04:41.560 into the business
01:04:42.200 to dominate.
01:04:44.540 And except for
01:04:45.420 his other issues,
01:04:47.280 he would have.
01:04:47.860 So focus works
01:04:50.240 everywhere.
01:04:51.260 As soon as you
01:04:51.940 say, yes, yes,
01:04:52.760 but what about
01:04:53.220 those weird
01:04:54.160 geniuses?
01:04:55.780 We're not them.
01:04:57.380 They're just not
01:04:58.180 part of our
01:04:58.860 equation.
01:05:00.080 The weird geniuses
01:05:01.100 are always going
01:05:01.540 to be here and
01:05:01.980 doing their weird
01:05:02.520 genius thing.
01:05:03.660 But normal people,
01:05:05.660 it's all about
01:05:06.300 what you focus on.
01:05:08.200 It's all about
01:05:09.160 what you focus on.
01:05:10.940 And I don't see
01:05:12.560 any focus in
01:05:13.580 black America
01:05:14.300 on training the
01:05:16.000 next generation
01:05:16.740 to be good
01:05:18.280 in business
01:05:18.900 and to learn
01:05:20.220 the tools of
01:05:20.880 success.
01:05:23.600 So what do you
01:05:24.540 predict about
01:05:25.100 the future?
01:05:26.560 Well, I would
01:05:27.140 predict it would
01:05:27.660 be exactly what
01:05:28.720 you think.
01:05:30.480 They'll dominate
01:05:31.260 in sports,
01:05:32.620 dominate in
01:05:33.520 fashion,
01:05:34.780 dominate in
01:05:35.320 music,
01:05:36.320 and lose in
01:05:37.020 economics every
01:05:38.380 time.
01:05:39.900 They're going to
01:05:40.360 lose in economics
01:05:41.520 every time because
01:05:42.480 there's no focus.
01:05:43.840 Now, if you
01:05:44.220 asked anybody,
01:05:45.300 I'm sure they'd
01:05:46.100 say, yes, yes,
01:05:46.660 making money is
01:05:47.240 very important.
01:05:48.280 We talk about it
01:05:49.040 all the time.
01:05:49.840 Not really.
01:05:51.340 Not really.
01:05:52.900 I mean, if you're
01:05:53.520 talking about it
01:05:54.180 and you're not
01:05:54.580 researching all the
01:05:55.600 ways to do it,
01:05:56.840 you're not, you
01:05:57.680 know, it's not
01:05:59.220 like your main
01:06:00.160 thing, that's
01:06:01.100 just talk.
01:06:02.600 Talking about it
01:06:03.440 is not focus.
01:06:04.620 That's not focus.
01:06:05.900 And when you do
01:06:06.520 talk about it, do
01:06:07.300 you talk about
01:06:07.800 winning or equity?
01:06:09.460 If you talk about
01:06:10.320 equity, that's
01:06:10.980 not, that's
01:06:11.800 nothing.
01:06:12.080 If you talk about
01:06:14.600 winning, I could
01:06:16.960 help you do it.
01:06:19.540 All right.
01:06:24.940 What?
01:06:28.760 Who runs the
01:06:29.560 media?
01:06:31.600 How does that
01:06:32.200 matter?
01:06:32.400 All right.
01:06:42.260 Yeah.
01:06:43.740 So, so somebody,
01:06:46.200 whenever I bring up
01:06:47.060 this conversation,
01:06:48.060 somebody wants to
01:06:48.760 bring up the bell
01:06:49.480 curve.
01:06:51.080 The trouble is
01:06:52.020 that's your, that
01:06:54.360 feels like a, your
01:06:56.400 little safe zone.
01:06:58.080 Like if you want
01:06:58.880 to retreat to a
01:06:59.580 safe space.
01:07:01.300 If you want to
01:07:02.160 talk about it with
01:07:03.920 any kind of depth,
01:07:06.460 the, the weirdos
01:07:07.840 that are skewing
01:07:08.760 the IQ stuff,
01:07:10.160 they're just not
01:07:10.800 part of the
01:07:11.180 conversation.
01:07:13.100 The, the fact
01:07:14.060 that, that Bill
01:07:16.220 Gates is also
01:07:17.180 white doesn't
01:07:18.220 help your IQ
01:07:18.960 at all.
01:07:20.680 Bill Gates
01:07:21.400 having high IQ
01:07:22.220 didn't help you
01:07:22.940 at all.
01:07:24.360 There, there's no
01:07:25.060 connection.
01:07:25.640 He's a different
01:07:26.120 person from you.
01:07:26.900 The fact that
01:07:27.980 he's also white
01:07:29.040 doesn't help you.
01:07:30.500 You're not
01:07:30.920 connected.
01:07:32.400 So if, if in
01:07:33.480 fact it's true,
01:07:35.200 I don't know if
01:07:35.780 it is, but if
01:07:36.840 some group has a
01:07:37.820 bunch of weirdos
01:07:38.560 that are skewing
01:07:39.200 the curve, there's
01:07:40.960 not enough of
01:07:41.640 them that they
01:07:42.220 need to be part
01:07:42.820 of the conversation.
01:07:44.200 The average
01:07:45.020 person does
01:07:46.640 great if they
01:07:47.980 do the normal
01:07:48.900 things that people
01:07:49.620 do to succeed.
01:07:51.540 They have a
01:07:52.200 good life.
01:07:53.340 Right?
01:07:53.460 We're not, we're
01:07:54.120 not all becoming
01:07:54.780 billionaires.
01:07:56.020 So as soon as
01:07:56.620 you think that
01:07:57.640 that average,
01:07:58.640 whatever average
01:07:59.460 you think is in
01:08:00.100 the bell curve,
01:08:01.140 you're going to
01:08:01.660 get a whole
01:08:02.000 bunch of, you
01:08:03.360 know, unfortunately
01:08:04.160 black citizens
01:08:05.720 who are just
01:08:06.800 getting destroyed
01:08:08.280 by the culture
01:08:09.460 that they were
01:08:10.160 born into,
01:08:10.880 right?
01:08:11.480 Systemic racism,
01:08:12.520 et cetera, poverty.
01:08:13.640 So you're going to
01:08:14.060 have people who
01:08:14.620 are, you know,
01:08:15.040 not eating as
01:08:15.840 well, that affects
01:08:16.720 your performance.
01:08:17.640 Not caring as
01:08:18.620 much, that affects
01:08:19.400 your performance.
01:08:20.780 You know, so,
01:08:21.260 so you're going to
01:08:21.960 get weirdos on
01:08:23.920 the extreme
01:08:24.840 lefts, who
01:08:27.040 are, probably
01:08:27.840 has more to do
01:08:28.460 with society, and
01:08:30.200 then you get the
01:08:30.800 weirdos on the
01:08:31.680 far, let's say,
01:08:33.040 the high end of
01:08:33.580 the curve, but
01:08:34.980 just ignore both
01:08:35.920 of them.
01:08:37.140 Just ignore both
01:08:38.020 of them.
01:08:38.940 Just take out of
01:08:39.920 the equation the
01:08:40.840 weird geniuses,
01:08:41.980 they're not you,
01:08:43.100 and then just take
01:08:44.580 into consideration
01:08:45.420 that if there's
01:08:46.160 more poverty in
01:08:46.940 one group, they
01:08:48.300 should score
01:08:49.100 less.
01:08:49.480 That's the most
01:08:50.680 predictable thing
01:08:51.480 you could imagine.
01:08:53.060 Poverty equals
01:08:54.160 lower grades.
01:08:56.560 No matter what
01:08:57.240 your native IQ is,
01:08:58.800 you're going to
01:08:59.220 get a lower IQ
01:08:59.980 score.
01:09:01.220 So you need to
01:09:04.840 rise up to that
01:09:06.100 level of complexity
01:09:07.160 before you have a
01:09:08.540 ticket to the
01:09:09.220 conversation, right?
01:09:10.980 If you're stuck on
01:09:11.980 the bell curve,
01:09:13.020 you're just hiding
01:09:14.300 in a safe space.
01:09:16.020 You're just sort of
01:09:16.740 ignoring the question.
01:09:18.420 The real question
01:09:19.100 is most people
01:09:19.980 are normal and
01:09:20.860 average and about
01:09:22.180 the same.
01:09:24.440 And if they use
01:09:25.500 good technique,
01:09:26.460 they do well.
01:09:29.400 And you should
01:09:30.420 treat the low
01:09:32.120 end of everything
01:09:33.460 as a separate
01:09:35.340 idea, and it's
01:09:37.040 not about race.
01:09:38.420 And the high end
01:09:39.480 are just, we're
01:09:40.300 lucky that we have
01:09:40.980 some freaks.
01:09:42.520 I mean, how lucky
01:09:43.220 is it that there
01:09:43.980 are geniuses?
01:09:44.980 But if it's not
01:09:46.020 you, it's not
01:09:46.720 relevant to you.
01:09:47.560 Well, so, my
01:09:55.680 mother was
01:09:56.120 valedictorian, my
01:09:56.980 sister was
01:09:57.400 valedictorian, and
01:09:58.260 we were always
01:09:58.760 low income.
01:09:59.820 Well, that's not
01:10:01.440 too far from my
01:10:02.480 family's situation.
01:10:04.100 And I grew up in
01:10:07.180 a small town.
01:10:09.580 Was it a small
01:10:10.440 town?
01:10:11.980 I'll bet it was.
01:10:13.400 I'll bet it wasn't
01:10:13.980 an inner city.
01:10:14.600 Just guessing.
01:10:18.620 All right.
01:10:21.240 I've got some
01:10:22.060 old stale bagels
01:10:23.040 I have to go
01:10:23.580 eat.
01:10:27.380 And I think
01:10:28.640 this was the
01:10:29.300 most useful
01:10:30.080 live stream
01:10:31.540 that anybody
01:10:33.380 will do today.
01:10:34.160 Booker says,
01:10:38.680 Scott denies the
01:10:39.600 existence of
01:10:40.300 black geniuses.
01:10:41.360 No, actually,
01:10:42.280 opposite Booker.
01:10:44.100 I consider
01:10:45.120 Kanye a genius.
01:10:47.440 I consider
01:10:48.440 Michael Jordan
01:10:50.460 a genius.
01:10:52.260 And, you know,
01:10:53.140 there are plenty
01:10:53.620 of, you know,
01:10:54.640 STEM people,
01:10:55.500 et cetera, so
01:10:56.040 there are plenty
01:10:56.580 of brilliant people
01:10:57.800 and everything.
01:10:58.120 But I don't
01:10:58.940 limit IQ
01:10:59.920 to, you know,
01:11:02.400 math and
01:11:02.860 reading.
01:11:04.180 I take the
01:11:04.980 bigger picture
01:11:05.620 that there is,
01:11:06.520 you know,
01:11:06.860 there's an
01:11:07.440 artistic genius,
01:11:09.100 there's a
01:11:09.620 physical genius,
01:11:12.060 you know,
01:11:12.940 musical genius.
01:11:15.320 You know,
01:11:15.580 if somebody
01:11:16.200 can do fashion
01:11:17.260 better than
01:11:17.960 you and I can,
01:11:19.340 and they can
01:11:19.860 consistently do it,
01:11:21.320 that's genius.
01:11:22.500 Prince,
01:11:23.140 Prince is a
01:11:23.740 genius.
01:11:25.060 Yeah.
01:11:25.200 Yep.
01:11:31.160 The point,
01:11:32.220 Booker,
01:11:32.760 was,
01:11:33.600 and I'm glad
01:11:34.020 you called me
01:11:34.660 on that because
01:11:35.300 I was unclear,
01:11:36.280 the point was
01:11:36.960 not that only
01:11:37.780 white people
01:11:38.460 are high on
01:11:39.140 Q.
01:11:39.780 I wasn't making
01:11:40.400 that point.
01:11:41.060 I was saying
01:11:41.520 that if it's
01:11:42.400 true that
01:11:43.440 there's a
01:11:43.780 higher concentration
01:11:44.540 of them,
01:11:45.300 that doesn't
01:11:46.000 tell you
01:11:46.300 anything.
01:11:48.040 It's just
01:11:48.600 not useful.
01:11:50.020 It might be
01:11:50.540 true,
01:11:51.540 but it's
01:11:53.040 not a useful
01:11:53.680 thing.
01:11:54.520 It's just
01:11:55.240 a thing
01:11:55.560 that exists.
01:11:58.780 Now,
01:12:00.020 I also
01:12:01.500 wondered,
01:12:02.360 do you
01:12:04.520 get,
01:12:04.900 do you
01:12:05.480 get more
01:12:06.140 geniuses
01:12:08.100 when you
01:12:08.380 have more
01:12:08.700 mixture
01:12:09.200 of ethnicities?
01:12:11.760 Does that
01:12:12.340 happen?
01:12:13.840 Does anybody
01:12:14.220 ever study
01:12:14.720 that?
01:12:15.820 Don't you
01:12:16.120 ever wonder?
01:12:17.380 Like,
01:12:17.720 if you just
01:12:18.120 took two
01:12:18.840 random,
01:12:19.520 any ethnicities
01:12:20.720 and mixed
01:12:21.120 them,
01:12:22.020 and let's
01:12:22.500 say you
01:12:22.720 did that
01:12:23.040 a number
01:12:23.380 of times,
01:12:23.780 compared to
01:12:24.560 any group
01:12:25.240 that's been
01:12:26.240 the same
01:12:26.680 for a
01:12:27.580 longer
01:12:27.800 period of
01:12:28.280 time?
01:12:29.800 Well,
01:12:30.200 here's what
01:12:30.540 I'm saying.
01:12:31.120 I think
01:12:31.560 you would
01:12:31.820 get more
01:12:32.320 variability,
01:12:33.700 wouldn't
01:12:33.900 you?
01:12:36.000 Is that
01:12:36.540 true or
01:12:36.840 not true?
01:12:38.360 Would you
01:12:38.760 get more
01:12:39.160 variability,
01:12:40.340 both on the
01:12:40.840 high end
01:12:41.260 and the
01:12:41.540 low end,
01:12:42.520 if you
01:12:43.160 mated two
01:12:43.980 people who
01:12:44.600 were more
01:12:44.980 different than
01:12:46.680 alike?
01:12:48.360 True or
01:12:48.900 no?
01:12:49.060 Just a
01:12:51.620 question.
01:12:52.960 Obviously,
01:12:53.520 it doesn't
01:12:53.820 explain
01:12:54.100 everything.
01:12:54.620 Everybody's
01:12:54.980 an individual.
01:12:56.020 Every group
01:12:56.820 has exceptions.
01:12:58.460 There's no
01:12:58.920 thing about
01:12:59.780 the average
01:13:00.240 that's true
01:13:00.780 for any
01:13:01.140 person.
01:13:02.300 So I'm
01:13:02.960 hoping everybody
01:13:03.600 watching this
01:13:04.180 knows all
01:13:04.580 the obvious
01:13:05.000 stuff,
01:13:05.340 right?
01:13:06.440 You all
01:13:07.120 know that
01:13:07.680 averages don't
01:13:08.640 talk about
01:13:09.480 any person.
01:13:11.820 And by
01:13:12.120 the way,
01:13:12.340 here's a
01:13:12.640 frame I
01:13:13.080 put on
01:13:13.700 do you
01:13:14.340 discriminate
01:13:14.820 against
01:13:15.380 people
01:13:15.780 individually?
01:13:17.440 Here's the
01:13:18.080 best frame
01:13:18.560 on that.
01:13:19.000 If somebody
01:13:19.300 says,
01:13:19.900 do you
01:13:20.120 discriminate
01:13:20.540 about one
01:13:22.200 specific person
01:13:23.020 because of
01:13:23.520 their ethnicity?
01:13:24.560 The correct
01:13:25.240 answer is
01:13:25.740 this.
01:13:26.620 This isn't
01:13:27.460 a race
01:13:27.780 question.
01:13:29.460 It's not
01:13:30.160 a race
01:13:30.440 question.
01:13:31.340 It's a
01:13:31.820 success
01:13:32.220 question.
01:13:33.720 If you
01:13:34.580 close yourself
01:13:35.660 off from
01:13:37.660 90% of the
01:13:38.700 world because
01:13:39.120 they don't
01:13:39.420 look like
01:13:39.800 you,
01:13:40.860 you're going
01:13:41.420 to have
01:13:41.900 fewer network
01:13:43.080 contacts.
01:13:44.300 You're going
01:13:44.600 to meet
01:13:44.860 fewer awesome
01:13:45.720 people.
01:13:46.020 You'll be
01:13:46.440 denying
01:13:46.780 yourself
01:13:47.200 the beauty
01:13:48.300 and the
01:13:48.660 talents of
01:13:49.220 90% of
01:13:49.820 the world.
01:13:50.720 From a
01:13:51.460 success
01:13:52.040 perspective,
01:13:52.920 which is
01:13:53.240 the better
01:13:53.580 frame,
01:13:54.880 it doesn't
01:13:55.340 make sense.
01:13:56.620 It does
01:13:57.140 not make
01:13:57.580 sense to
01:13:58.080 judge people
01:13:58.980 by immutable
01:14:00.520 characteristics like
01:14:02.040 skin color
01:14:03.120 because you're
01:14:04.360 cutting yourself
01:14:05.040 off from
01:14:06.340 the potential
01:14:07.000 of valuable
01:14:07.920 resources.
01:14:10.200 Somebody
01:14:10.880 could do
01:14:11.320 you a
01:14:11.580 favor
01:14:11.820 someday,
01:14:12.940 somebody
01:14:13.280 who knows
01:14:13.620 somebody they
01:14:14.160 can introduce
01:14:14.820 you to,
01:14:15.280 somebody who
01:14:15.820 can hire
01:14:16.180 you someday,
01:14:17.540 somebody you
01:14:17.960 can hire
01:14:18.300 someday.
01:14:21.620 As soon as
01:14:22.440 you think
01:14:22.800 that's a
01:14:23.240 race question,
01:14:24.900 I question
01:14:25.920 your understanding
01:14:28.680 of success.
01:14:30.000 You should
01:14:30.540 always look at
01:14:31.300 the statistics,
01:14:32.480 which is what
01:14:33.020 got me in
01:14:33.420 trouble, by the
01:14:33.880 way.
01:14:34.440 But that's a
01:14:35.400 case where the
01:14:36.000 statistics say
01:14:36.940 don't discriminate.
01:14:38.520 that's not
01:14:40.420 in your best
01:14:41.060 interest.
01:14:41.960 You're reducing
01:14:42.820 your numerical
01:14:44.360 chances of
01:14:45.180 success.
01:14:46.860 So I
01:14:47.480 could never
01:14:47.800 be in
01:14:48.120 favor of
01:14:48.420 that.
01:14:50.340 Lots of
01:14:50.980 times we
01:14:51.380 think things
01:14:51.920 are about
01:14:52.280 race when
01:14:52.940 it's really
01:14:53.280 about stupidity.
01:14:55.320 That would
01:14:55.880 just be stupid.
01:14:57.860 In 2023,
01:14:59.360 if you
01:15:00.220 deny your
01:15:01.480 relationship with
01:15:02.260 somebody because
01:15:02.940 of their race
01:15:03.480 or religion
01:15:03.960 or gender
01:15:04.960 or whatever
01:15:05.320 it is,
01:15:06.500 all you
01:15:06.900 did is
01:15:07.200 reduce the
01:15:07.720 number of
01:15:08.060 options you
01:15:08.660 had for a
01:15:09.900 better life.
01:15:12.300 Is there
01:15:13.880 anybody left
01:15:14.600 in the world
01:15:15.140 who is such
01:15:16.180 a racist
01:15:16.600 that they
01:15:17.640 would say,
01:15:18.680 I cannot
01:15:18.960 possibly judge
01:15:20.120 some gay
01:15:21.220 individual on
01:15:22.900 anything other
01:15:23.520 than they're
01:15:23.920 gay?
01:15:25.040 Is that a
01:15:25.820 thing still
01:15:26.780 in 2023?
01:15:28.780 I'm pretty
01:15:29.540 sure that even
01:15:30.200 people who you
01:15:31.080 would consider
01:15:32.000 the most
01:15:33.480 bigoted people
01:15:34.300 still sort
01:15:36.000 of judge
01:15:36.360 people
01:15:36.660 individually
01:15:37.240 because it's
01:15:38.360 in their
01:15:38.600 best interest.
01:15:41.120 I've never
01:15:41.740 met an
01:15:42.100 exception to
01:15:42.640 that.
01:15:44.840 No, not
01:15:45.500 the gay
01:15:45.800 race.
01:15:51.180 Yeah.
01:15:52.540 All right.
01:15:53.340 So that's
01:15:53.740 your reframe
01:15:54.840 for the day.
01:15:55.420 YouTube, I'm
01:15:55.960 going to say
01:15:56.340 see you later
01:15:57.080 and thanks
01:15:58.280 for joining.
01:15:59.220 Bye for now.
01:16:00.540 Remember to
01:16:00.960 set your
01:16:01.200 clocks.
01:16:02.000 Set your
01:16:02.360 clocks tonight.
01:16:04.300 Good-bye.
01:16:11.060 Good-bye.
01:16:11.920 Bye-bye.
01:16:12.880 Bye-bye.
01:16:13.540 Bye-bye.
01:16:14.120 Bye-bye.
01:16:14.880 Bye.
01:16:15.000 Bye-bye.
01:16:15.780 Bye-bye.
01:16:16.120 Bye-bye.
01:16:16.840 Bye-bye.
01:16:17.780 Bye-bye.
01:16:18.380 Christmas.
01:16:18.940 Bye-bye.
01:16:19.360 Bye-bye.
01:16:24.760 Bye-bye.
01:16:24.920 Bye-bye.
01:16:25.340 Bye-bye.
01:16:25.680 Bye-bye.
01:16:26.200 Bye-bye.
01:16:29.020 Bye-bye.
01:16:29.620 Bye-bye.
01:16:30.300 Bye-bye.