Real Coffee with Scott Adams - March 19, 2023


Episode 2052 Scott Adams: Trump Indictment Absurdity, My Second Rant, Fentanyl Strategy


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 4 minutes

Words per minute

145.16304

Word count

9,398

Sentence count

762

Harmful content

Misogyny

36

sentences flagged

Hate speech

23

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Join us for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine sippin and join me now for the unrivaled pleasure of a simultaneous sip. If you'd like to take this experience up a level, join us.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the finest live stream in the history of live streams.
00:00:09.140 And today, your experience is going to reach levels which, I don't know if you can even
00:00:14.460 handle it.
00:00:15.400 It'll be so awesome.
00:00:17.000 But if you'd like to take your experience up with the rest of us, join us.
00:00:21.940 Join us.
00:00:22.720 Let's take this experience up.
00:00:24.180 Yes, I almost want to make a joke, but don't ruin my flow.
00:00:31.600 Don't ruin my flow.
00:00:33.280 That was a...
00:00:35.040 Just kidding.
00:00:36.440 But anyway, all you need is a cupper in my eye.
00:00:39.020 Do you know that when my flow gets disturbed, it really does have this ripple effect?
00:00:46.500 I'm going to try to regain my...
00:00:48.980 And here's the way I'm going to do it.
00:00:50.360 As I was saying, if you want to bring this experience up a level, somebody mentioned
00:00:57.340 Stormy Daniels in the comments, and it was just too good.
00:01:02.360 Like, okay, no, don't make a joke about bringing your experience up and mention Stormy Daniels.
00:01:09.120 Do not do it.
00:01:10.300 And then I'm trying to think at the same time, and I'm thinking, no, no Stormy Daniels joke.
00:01:14.840 No.
00:01:15.560 And then I lost my place.
00:01:17.740 So I'm going to have to do the Stormy Daniels joke first before I can even do the simultaneous
00:01:24.100 set.
00:01:24.580 It's just now in my head.
00:01:26.160 You did that to me.
00:01:30.300 If you'd like to take this experience up to levels that only Stormy Daniels could provide,
00:01:37.260 all you need is a cupper, a mug, or a glass, a tanker, a chalice, a tine, a gentee, a jug,
00:01:40.960 a flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:01:42.800 See, much better that were.
00:01:43.680 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine here in the day.
00:01:47.740 The thing makes everything better.
00:01:49.240 It's called a simultaneous sip.
00:01:51.400 Now we're back in the flow.
00:01:53.040 All right, it's working now.
00:01:54.540 Go.
00:01:59.000 All right, now we're on track.
00:02:05.040 Right on track.
00:02:05.860 Do you all know that Dilbert, although canceled worldwide, is running on the Locals platform
00:02:15.200 at scottadams.locals.com?
00:02:18.860 And people have asked me, Scott, these are new comics, but where are all the old ones that
00:02:24.060 used to be on the archive on Dilbert.com?
00:02:25.980 I don't have a solution for that, but I probably will.
00:02:31.520 Please understand that when you get canceled worldwide, it creates extra work.
00:02:37.420 So I'm a little bit busy for the next few weeks, but it's all good stuff.
00:02:42.380 Honestly, being canceled is one of the best things that's ever happened to me.
00:02:45.900 I did not plan it that way.
00:02:47.600 I really didn't.
00:02:48.960 But it could not have worked out better.
00:02:52.280 Honestly, it could not have been better.
00:02:53.720 All right, but enough about me.
00:02:57.940 Elon Musk says he's got a new plan for Twitter, the Twitter feed.
00:03:05.360 So you'll see, the first things you'll see is people you follow.
00:03:10.640 Doesn't it seem like that should have been the first thing you saw before?
00:03:16.660 The people I follow were not the first things I was seeing.
00:03:19.760 Like, I was definitely missing people I was following, but I thought, wouldn't it make
00:03:27.540 perfect sense that the people you follow were the first ones you saw?
00:03:31.060 Is that really different?
00:03:33.040 But I guess it will be different.
00:03:35.540 After the people you follow, next would be verified accounts.
00:03:38.540 So people who paid to be verified.
00:03:40.480 And then third would be unverified accounts.
00:03:42.680 So I don't know what percentage of my trolls are unverified accounts, but at least half.
00:03:52.560 So that'd be good.
00:03:53.780 At least half of them are just, you know, bad people doing bad things.
00:03:58.580 So I think, I think, and Musk says that the verified accounts are a thousand times harder
00:04:04.380 to game by bots and troll armies.
00:04:06.420 So we should see, this will happen in the next few weeks, so we should see some kind of big
00:04:12.760 difference in Twitter.
00:04:15.060 But I do, I do want to make sure that I don't miss people who I don't follow.
00:04:21.220 I mean, the people that I don't follow are sometimes the most interesting ones, simply
00:04:25.720 because they disagree with you.
00:04:27.560 So this is a good thing to try.
00:04:30.360 I think, I think it's the right direction, but we'll see how it works out.
00:04:32.720 How many of you saw my rant yesterday?
00:04:40.220 Was it yesterday?
00:04:42.440 Yeah.
00:04:43.840 How many of you think that that rant will go viral?
00:04:47.780 You think it'll go viral?
00:04:50.000 I don't.
00:04:51.840 You know why it won't go viral?
00:04:54.200 Well, it could, you know, it might go a little viral just among, you know, a certain part of
00:04:59.260 the population, but it won't cross over to the rest.
00:05:02.140 Do you know why?
00:05:03.800 It's too dangerous.
00:05:05.420 It's too dangerous.
00:05:06.480 Yeah.
00:05:06.920 Now, if there's something in there they could take out of context, because all of the, you
00:05:12.360 know, everything's political in this environment.
00:05:15.280 If they could find some political way to tank me, they'll do it.
00:05:20.000 But there's no way that they're going to show the whole rant, because it's too honest.
00:05:25.120 It's just too honest.
00:05:26.200 And there is a degree of honesty that the system can't handle, and that was well beyond
00:05:35.660 the limit they can handle.
00:05:36.880 So you're not going to see that.
00:05:38.420 That will never go viral.
00:05:40.340 I promise you.
00:05:41.160 I've seen more people speculating what I speculate, that the reason Kamala Harris acts the way she 1.00
00:05:49.120 does in public is that she's drunk.
00:05:52.060 Now, have I ever been in trouble before for saying somebody seemed drunk in public?
00:05:57.660 Yes, I have.
00:05:58.500 I would say it about Hillary Clinton, but not every time she spoke.
00:06:04.460 I've never said Hillary was drunk every time she spoke, because it didn't look like it. 0.70
00:06:09.940 It was just that sometimes she looked like maybe she had some wine for lunch or something.
00:06:16.020 But Kamala does look drunk pretty much every time she speaks. 0.99
00:06:21.720 Now, I'm not saying she is, because the story would be just as shocking if she were not.
00:06:27.540 Imagine if she acts like that naturally.
00:06:31.860 I mean, literally, that would be scary.
00:06:34.660 I would be a little more comfortable if I found out she had been drinking, because at least you can stop 1.00
00:06:39.780 drinking, you know, for a few minutes.
00:06:43.820 But here's my current speculation, just speculation.
00:06:50.240 So this is based on, you know, living a life and knowing a lot of people and just sort of being in this
00:06:55.820 world, but here's my speculation.
00:06:58.640 I think she's like Raj on, remember the show, The Big Bang Theory?
00:07:06.660 The Big Bang Theory?
00:07:08.220 There was a character, Raj, who couldn't speak to women unless he was drinking alcohol.
00:07:13.900 He literally just couldn't speak.
00:07:15.280 And I feel like Kamala has fear of public speaking, and that when she thinks she's going to speak,
00:07:24.220 I think she has to drink.
00:07:26.020 That's just my speculation.
00:07:28.260 And here's what it's based on.
00:07:29.680 Very scant clues.
00:07:31.940 Very scant.
00:07:32.980 Number one, she acts drunk quite often when she's talking.
00:07:37.320 Number two, the over-cackling seems to be a fear of public speaking.
00:07:43.500 Do you get that?
00:07:46.640 The laughing too hard is sort of like buying her time in a public situation.
00:07:51.540 So it's not just a speech, but also, you know, she's answering questions.
00:07:56.100 I think the cackle is a delaying tactic because she doesn't want to speak.
00:08:00.880 I think that people who are afraid of speaking in public might sometimes say to themselves,
00:08:07.280 well, you know, after a glass of wine, I'm a lot better.
00:08:11.360 Just one glass of wine.
00:08:12.460 But then you have two because, hey, if one is good, two might be great.
00:08:19.000 And that's my theory, is that she drinks because she's not a comfortable public speaker. 1.00
00:08:26.440 Now, I did a little Googling and found out that in two occasions she's helped people who are bad at public speaking.
00:08:34.000 She gave them advice.
00:08:35.060 One was somebody who was breaking down in public, and she helped him out.
00:08:38.780 And now there were some young girls, and she was giving them some advice about how to be comfortable public speaking.
00:08:45.960 How many other national politicians have ever advised somebody on public speaking?
00:08:56.020 I've never heard of it.
00:08:57.080 It seems like that would be maybe something in her mind or something she cared about.
00:09:02.720 So there's a little bit of a tell that she cares about public speaking and being comfortable.
00:09:09.460 It would also explain my biggest mystery about her.
00:09:13.440 In the beginning of the primary, I thought that she would be the strongest candidate.
00:09:18.020 And that was based entirely upon seeing her performance during congressional hearings, where she'd be one of the people interviewing people.
00:09:27.760 And I thought, wow, she looks really put together.
00:09:32.020 And when she's interviewing people and asking tough questions like a prosecutor, she actually seemed on her game.
00:09:39.600 And then I learned that the only thing she does capably is blaming other people of crimes.
00:09:48.580 That's the only thing she can do.
00:09:50.460 So it actually explains why she was a public prosecutor and, you know, attorney general of the state,
00:09:56.720 is that blaming people of stuff, she can do really well.
00:10:01.000 But as soon as she gets out of the mode of blaming stuff, you know, politicians, criminals,
00:10:06.000 as soon as she's not blaming somebody, she doesn't know what to do.
00:10:09.600 So she has one mode that she's good at.
00:10:12.800 Oh, I'm blaming you of a crime.
00:10:15.080 I'm blaming you of some racism.
00:10:16.960 I'm blaming you of being a bad politician.
00:10:19.280 I blame you, I blame you, I blame you.
00:10:21.340 But as soon as she's out of blame mode, it looks like she can't speak.
00:10:26.500 She's got one mode.
00:10:28.560 So that's on me, because I saw her coincidentally in her prosecutor mode 1.00
00:10:33.420 when she was doing these congressional investigations.
00:10:36.420 And I thought, well, there's somebody who knows how to do this investigating stuff.
00:10:41.760 It looks like that would be a skill that you could transfer into the larger leadership realm.
00:10:47.100 But apparently she doesn't have those skills. 0.81
00:10:49.340 She's just good at blaming people for crimes. 0.99
00:10:53.260 A very narrow skill, but got her to vice president. 0.94
00:10:57.360 And so I'm going to start calling her, instead of Kamala Harris,
00:11:02.160 I think I'll call her Druncula.
00:11:04.660 Sort of like Count Druncula.
00:11:07.340 Druncula Harris.
00:11:08.900 And here's my take.
00:11:10.500 If she's not drunk,
00:11:12.400 that's not the good news.
00:11:16.040 Now, the good news is not that,
00:11:17.920 Scott, you're wrong.
00:11:18.760 She doesn't ever do that. 1.00
00:11:21.380 She was completely sober.
00:11:23.100 That's the bad news.
00:11:25.360 I'm being a little bit kind by saying,
00:11:27.580 I hope she's drunk.
00:11:29.020 Because if she acts like this, 1.00
00:11:30.880 literally,
00:11:31.580 and by the way, this is not hyperbole.
00:11:33.860 Doesn't it sound like it?
00:11:35.340 That difference between, you know,
00:11:37.120 a joke and reality,
00:11:38.660 it's now completely merged.
00:11:40.320 I'm not kidding.
00:11:42.080 If this is her real self,
00:11:44.260 I'm way more afraid
00:11:45.400 than if she has some drinks,
00:11:47.720 and maybe sometimes she can make sober decisions
00:11:49.940 when we're not watching.
00:11:51.480 That would be the best-case scenario.
00:11:53.840 Sort of like Winston Churchill.
00:11:56.800 He drank a lot,
00:11:58.620 but seemed to get the job done.
00:12:02.360 So it's not the drinking that would bother me.
00:12:05.240 It would be if she's not drunk. 0.98
00:12:09.660 Putin is now,
00:12:11.080 I guess he's an accused war criminal 0.80
00:12:14.760 because there's some Rome statue.
00:12:16.780 123 nations are obliged to arrest Putin
00:12:21.340 if he shows up in their country.
00:12:23.920 So remember how Putin was always showing up
00:12:27.320 at all these G20s,
00:12:28.940 and he was always visiting other countries,
00:12:31.860 and he had this really high profile,
00:12:33.800 which I think was really good for Russia.
00:12:36.800 Like, it gave you an impression of Russia
00:12:38.400 as, you know, like a number two
00:12:40.260 or number three on the world stage,
00:12:41.980 and, you know, real involved in world affairs,
00:12:45.260 and, you know,
00:12:45.840 one of the people you should take seriously.
00:12:48.960 But now,
00:12:50.320 but now he can't even travel
00:12:53.680 to most countries
00:12:55.200 without being worried about getting arrested.
00:12:58.760 What do you think would happen
00:12:59.980 if Putin got arrested
00:13:01.060 in another country
00:13:03.000 and actually held?
00:13:06.760 Do you think that over in Russia,
00:13:10.060 his cronies would say,
00:13:11.280 oh, we'd better do everything
00:13:13.500 to get him out of there,
00:13:14.720 threaten war, et cetera,
00:13:16.240 or would the people back in Russia say,
00:13:20.240 well, it looks like we all got a promotion?
00:13:24.820 Am I wrong?
00:13:26.220 I think if some other country
00:13:27.700 picked up Putin,
00:13:30.280 there, of course,
00:13:31.080 would be lots of noise.
00:13:32.400 Oh, stop that.
00:13:34.180 We're going to nuke you. 1.00
00:13:35.620 But do you think that
00:13:36.580 they would actually feel bad?
00:13:39.120 Because whoever is number two in line
00:13:41.060 or thinks they might be number two,
00:13:43.060 there might be a number of people
00:13:44.340 who think they have a shot at it,
00:13:46.100 wouldn't they all be happier
00:13:47.720 if Putin were gone?
00:13:49.300 And it's not their fault?
00:13:51.180 Well, it's not our fault.
00:13:52.380 He's just sort of not available,
00:13:54.320 so I guess the rest of us
00:13:56.500 will have to figure out who's in charge.
00:13:58.060 But it wasn't us.
00:13:59.240 It was that other country.
00:14:00.200 So it feels like
00:14:03.600 it would be the best-case scenario
00:14:05.220 for the Russians themselves.
00:14:06.780 Because even the worst,
00:14:08.300 the worst of the leaders
00:14:09.960 who might try to take over
00:14:11.280 and be their own little, you know, despot, 0.51
00:14:14.080 even they would think,
00:14:15.640 well, I just got promoted one level.
00:14:18.680 I'm a little bit closer to the top today.
00:14:22.060 Yeah.
00:14:22.480 No, that's not mind-reading.
00:14:23.580 That's speculation.
00:14:24.940 That's different.
00:14:25.640 So I enjoy it when somebody says,
00:14:29.540 Scott, are you mind-reading?
00:14:31.000 Because that's actually a good question.
00:14:33.820 Speculation is,
00:14:34.880 I don't know what they're thinking,
00:14:36.740 but I'm imagining
00:14:37.580 what ordinary people would do
00:14:39.340 in this situation.
00:14:40.320 That's just speculation.
00:14:42.060 But if I said,
00:14:43.680 those people are thinking X,
00:14:46.540 that's mind-reading.
00:14:47.980 That's mind-reading.
00:14:49.080 And that would be dumb.
00:14:51.860 All right.
00:14:52.260 So Putin can't go too many places.
00:14:55.860 That's kind of a bummer for him.
00:14:57.980 Over at CNN,
00:14:59.100 the cat's on the roof.
00:15:01.580 And by that,
00:15:02.120 I mean CNN's Erin Burnett
00:15:03.740 was talking to some punta expert
00:15:06.240 about the revelations
00:15:08.320 about the payments
00:15:09.280 from Chinese companies
00:15:11.740 and other companies
00:15:13.240 to the Bidens
00:15:15.160 directly and indirectly.
00:15:17.220 And this is what she said.
00:15:19.840 So this is Erin Burnett
00:15:24.580 and CNN.
00:15:25.500 So again,
00:15:26.480 from a layperson,
00:15:28.020 that doesn't look good.
00:15:29.160 That doesn't look good.
00:15:34.480 That doesn't look good.
00:15:37.260 She continued before asking Goodman,
00:15:39.440 who was her guest,
00:15:40.620 if he found the records
00:15:41.680 to be damaging legally.
00:15:43.380 So apparently the experts said
00:15:46.000 there's probably nothing legally
00:15:49.060 that's illegal.
00:15:51.640 And I agree with that.
00:15:53.180 Probably not.
00:15:54.560 There's probably nothing illegal.
00:15:56.540 But even their experts said,
00:15:58.860 but it certainly looks unethical.
00:16:01.680 Now,
00:16:02.100 if you've got CNN's Erin Burnett
00:16:05.020 stirring to hint,
00:16:07.260 just a little bit of a suggestion
00:16:08.720 of a hint
00:16:09.360 that the Biden crime family
00:16:11.560 is exactly what it looks like,
00:16:13.160 exactly what it looks like.
00:16:15.880 It might not be illegal.
00:16:18.140 It might not be.
00:16:19.120 I don't know.
00:16:20.220 But
00:16:20.740 you don't want it.
00:16:22.740 It's definitely something
00:16:23.780 you don't want.
00:16:25.160 Now,
00:16:25.420 my understanding is
00:16:26.280 there's
00:16:26.520 some
00:16:27.680 Marco Polo document
00:16:30.040 that documents,
00:16:31.580 you know,
00:16:31.960 hundreds of crimes
00:16:33.220 that Hunter Biden did.
00:16:34.860 And that might be true, too.
00:16:36.700 But it also might be
00:16:38.040 hundreds of crimes
00:16:39.400 that are sort of
00:16:40.160 theoretical,
00:16:41.340 like whatever,
00:16:42.960 whatever the hell
00:16:43.800 Trump is being accused of now.
00:16:45.960 Stuff that you wouldn't
00:16:47.060 normally pursue
00:16:48.500 for anybody.
00:16:50.640 But
00:16:51.160 I'm open to the possibility
00:16:53.420 that there are
00:16:54.480 genuine crimes.
00:16:56.140 I mean,
00:16:56.380 certainly with his gun
00:16:57.740 gun situation,
00:16:59.140 there was something
00:16:59.880 that looked like a crime.
00:17:01.860 Well,
00:17:02.180 you know,
00:17:02.900 if you're paying for access,
00:17:05.300 is that a crime?
00:17:11.080 Can you not charge
00:17:12.360 for an introduction?
00:17:14.520 I've never heard of that
00:17:15.600 being a crime.
00:17:17.840 You can?
00:17:18.480 Well,
00:17:18.880 that's if you didn't
00:17:19.760 register as a foreign
00:17:21.860 whatever,
00:17:26.060 lobbyist or something.
00:17:27.680 But even that doesn't get,
00:17:29.340 even that typically
00:17:30.560 doesn't get prosecuted,
00:17:32.220 right?
00:17:32.380 There are lots of people
00:17:34.980 who have done
00:17:35.300 the same thing,
00:17:36.340 but they're
00:17:36.840 sort of,
00:17:38.620 you know,
00:17:39.640 as long as they
00:17:40.640 admit it after the fact,
00:17:42.260 it's not the biggest
00:17:43.060 deal in the world.
00:17:45.420 Yeah.
00:17:46.060 Well,
00:17:46.500 I guess that's
00:17:47.020 selective prosecution,
00:17:48.160 too.
00:17:48.320 Depends how much
00:17:48.900 you like the person.
00:17:50.280 If you like them,
00:17:51.440 it's no big deal.
00:17:52.860 If you don't like them,
00:17:54.860 arrest them.
00:17:56.360 Well,
00:17:56.800 here's what they're
00:17:57.360 not saying on CNN.
00:17:59.280 At least I haven't
00:17:59.820 seen it yet.
00:18:00.440 the walls are closing
00:18:02.220 in on Trump.
00:18:03.980 Have you seen that yet?
00:18:05.840 Has anybody on CNN
00:18:07.080 said the walls
00:18:08.420 are closing in?
00:18:11.340 And I'm pretty sure
00:18:12.340 that they have somebody
00:18:13.220 on retainer
00:18:14.720 whose only job it is
00:18:16.440 to say the walls
00:18:17.100 are closing in.
00:18:18.720 Like one of the
00:18:19.680 anti-Trump
00:18:20.680 opinion writers.
00:18:24.380 You know,
00:18:24.540 they have,
00:18:25.000 their opinion writers
00:18:25.760 are just the anti-Trumper,
00:18:27.240 you know,
00:18:27.480 go-to team.
00:18:29.280 Even they won't do it.
00:18:30.440 But no word yet
00:18:31.800 on MSNBC.
00:18:34.940 MSNBC,
00:18:35.760 I think they're
00:18:36.480 probably still committed.
00:18:38.260 Yeah,
00:18:38.480 they're still committed
00:18:39.160 to being nothing
00:18:40.380 even similar to news.
00:18:42.420 To be as far away
00:18:43.860 from anything
00:18:44.340 that's like a
00:18:45.060 legitimate news
00:18:46.060 entity as you
00:18:47.320 could possibly be.
00:18:48.960 So,
00:18:49.520 if you're making
00:18:50.080 CNN look like
00:18:51.000 the reasonable ones,
00:18:52.760 that's quite a statement.
00:18:54.820 And MSNBC,
00:18:55.900 I think,
00:18:56.260 they're doing it.
00:18:56.640 Well,
00:18:57.560 Jonathan Turley
00:18:58.380 weighed in
00:18:58.960 on these alleged
00:19:00.140 indictments
00:19:01.300 that are coming
00:19:01.860 for Trump
00:19:02.640 out of the
00:19:03.500 Manhattan office
00:19:04.300 and Alvin Bragg,
00:19:05.880 the DA.
00:19:07.540 And,
00:19:08.100 here's how
00:19:11.420 Jonathan Turley
00:19:12.220 puts it.
00:19:15.640 He says,
00:19:16.960 Trump faces
00:19:17.860 serious legal threats,
00:19:19.280 blah, blah, blah,
00:19:19.680 but the New York case
00:19:21.140 could be easily
00:19:22.180 dismissed
00:19:22.780 outside of a
00:19:23.880 jurisdiction
00:19:24.420 like New York
00:19:25.440 where Bragg
00:19:26.660 could count
00:19:27.220 on highly
00:19:27.720 motivated judges
00:19:28.740 and jurors.
00:19:30.340 So,
00:19:30.840 Turley,
00:19:31.380 who knows
00:19:31.920 what he's talking
00:19:32.480 about,
00:19:33.520 he's one of the
00:19:34.300 reasonable people
00:19:34.960 in the world,
00:19:36.120 says basically
00:19:36.960 it's only going
00:19:38.040 forward because
00:19:39.000 New York
00:19:39.600 is not a
00:19:41.020 reasonable place.
00:19:43.420 That's your
00:19:44.080 starting point,
00:19:44.940 that this wouldn't
00:19:46.080 work in a
00:19:46.580 reasonable state.
00:19:47.620 It's only that
00:19:48.300 New York is broken
00:19:49.240 that it's even
00:19:50.680 happening.
00:19:51.800 Now,
00:19:51.960 that's a good
00:19:52.360 starting place
00:19:53.340 for the
00:19:53.600 conversation.
00:19:54.420 Turley's branding
00:19:57.180 this America's
00:19:58.440 got Trump.
00:20:01.160 That's the funny
00:20:02.080 version of the
00:20:02.700 walls are closing
00:20:03.440 in,
00:20:04.220 like from the
00:20:05.180 people who can
00:20:06.100 see what's
00:20:06.500 happening.
00:20:07.660 It's like,
00:20:08.380 America's got
00:20:09.380 Trump.
00:20:10.520 And apparently,
00:20:11.920 could any of
00:20:12.860 this be televised?
00:20:17.600 Is it possible
00:20:18.620 that this would
00:20:19.240 be televised
00:20:19.940 and it would
00:20:20.360 actually be like
00:20:21.160 a reality show
00:20:23.180 America's got
00:20:23.940 Trump?
00:20:24.860 We got him
00:20:25.460 this time.
00:20:26.480 We got you
00:20:27.040 Trump.
00:20:28.920 I would kind
00:20:29.700 of enjoy that.
00:20:31.580 I would sort
00:20:32.180 of like to see
00:20:32.760 it.
00:20:33.900 Honestly,
00:20:34.820 I'd like to see
00:20:35.720 it.
00:20:36.220 I don't think
00:20:36.740 there's any
00:20:37.140 chance that
00:20:37.640 Trump will be
00:20:38.140 handcuffed
00:20:38.660 because that
00:20:39.220 would be just
00:20:39.680 handing him
00:20:40.140 the election.
00:20:41.440 But anything
00:20:42.320 is possible.
00:20:45.260 And apparently
00:20:45.740 the Hillary
00:20:46.380 Clinton campaign,
00:20:47.440 I'm reminded,
00:20:48.280 again by
00:20:48.740 Jonathan Turley
00:20:49.640 and writing
00:20:50.420 in the Hill
00:20:51.560 or at least
00:20:52.600 it's printed
00:20:53.100 in the Hill,
00:20:54.260 that the
00:20:56.260 Hillary Clinton
00:20:56.820 campaign hid
00:20:57.980 the Steele
00:20:58.520 dossier payments,
00:21:00.200 in other words,
00:21:00.800 they paid to have
00:21:01.840 the Steele dossier
00:21:02.680 created,
00:21:03.120 but they
00:21:04.260 laundered those
00:21:05.020 payments as
00:21:05.880 legal expenses
00:21:06.880 as opposed to a
00:21:08.560 campaign expense,
00:21:09.540 which it clearly
00:21:10.180 was.
00:21:10.600 Do you think
00:21:12.380 anybody was saying
00:21:13.100 that Hillary 1.00
00:21:14.600 should be picked
00:21:15.240 up and
00:21:15.560 handcuffed?
00:21:16.740 Of course not.
00:21:17.860 She just paid a
00:21:18.560 fine.
00:21:19.940 She paid a
00:21:20.500 fine.
00:21:20.840 That was it.
00:21:22.780 Now, it's not
00:21:24.140 exactly the same
00:21:25.240 situation, but on
00:21:28.120 the other hand,
00:21:29.100 it's exactly the
00:21:30.120 same situation, if
00:21:32.140 you know what I
00:21:32.600 mean.
00:21:33.040 It's different, but
00:21:34.480 it's exactly the
00:21:35.420 same, meaning that
00:21:36.780 they're both being
00:21:38.040 treated politically,
00:21:39.440 in my opinion.
00:21:40.720 Now, I think the
00:21:41.380 right way to treat
00:21:42.120 it is politically,
00:21:43.640 by the way.
00:21:44.920 And the right
00:21:45.460 way is the way
00:21:46.040 Hillary was 0.59
00:21:46.560 treated.
00:21:47.880 I'm actually glad
00:21:49.020 that Hillary was 0.83
00:21:49.700 not put in jail
00:21:50.780 for that Steele
00:21:51.620 dossier, because
00:21:53.660 if you start
00:21:55.240 going down that
00:21:56.000 road, then a
00:21:57.580 lot of political
00:21:58.260 stuff is going to
00:21:58.980 be a jailable 0.98
00:21:59.700 offense, and I'm
00:22:00.700 not sure that's
00:22:02.000 in our best
00:22:02.440 interest.
00:22:03.880 If you catch
00:22:05.620 them and you
00:22:06.080 make it news and
00:22:07.000 it's part of the
00:22:07.520 campaign, and
00:22:08.560 maybe information
00:22:10.480 is the better way
00:22:11.180 to go, I'm not
00:22:12.040 really in favor of
00:22:13.640 going hard against
00:22:14.540 candidates.
00:22:15.460 Especially losing
00:22:16.580 candidates.
00:22:17.880 That's not a good
00:22:18.640 look for the
00:22:20.020 republic.
00:22:21.280 So I would go
00:22:22.200 easy on politicians
00:22:23.660 at the highest
00:22:24.320 level, anyway.
00:22:25.240 I would go easy
00:22:25.980 on them for what I
00:22:27.400 call the technical
00:22:28.240 violations.
00:22:30.100 They're skeevy and
00:22:31.320 they're sketchy and
00:22:32.300 they're unethical, but
00:22:34.740 if you put them in
00:22:36.000 jail, it's just a
00:22:36.980 whole different game.
00:22:37.820 So let me say as
00:22:40.820 clearly as possible, I
00:22:42.200 do not believe in
00:22:43.060 equal justice for
00:22:43.940 all.
00:22:44.760 I believe that our
00:22:45.640 leaders should be
00:22:46.260 treated better than
00:22:48.100 the rest of us.
00:22:50.400 Has anybody ever
00:22:51.320 said that?
00:22:52.960 As long as I apply
00:22:54.060 it to both sides, I
00:22:55.640 feel like it's a
00:22:56.300 completely reasonable
00:22:58.320 thing to say.
00:22:59.560 Yeah, the whole
00:23:00.100 nobody's above the
00:23:02.420 law, I get that.
00:23:04.740 Nobody's above the
00:23:05.600 law, but you
00:23:06.440 still have to run
00:23:07.140 the law for the
00:23:07.820 benefit of the
00:23:08.380 citizens.
00:23:14.080 No, people should
00:23:16.320 not pull their
00:23:17.060 money from banks
00:23:18.040 because of the
00:23:18.840 January 6th thing.
00:23:20.560 Do not crash the
00:23:21.540 economy of the
00:23:22.200 United States over
00:23:23.140 a protest.
00:23:24.100 That's not the way
00:23:24.840 to go.
00:23:25.120 I'm seeing that
00:23:25.600 suggestion.
00:23:26.940 That's not a good
00:23:27.740 suggestion.
00:23:28.800 Yeah, you should
00:23:29.800 drop that right away.
00:23:31.620 I'm okay with
00:23:32.340 protests, but don't
00:23:34.340 destroy your own
00:23:35.240 economy.
00:23:35.800 That sounds like
00:23:36.360 China talking.
00:23:38.120 I mean, seriously,
00:23:39.400 if I had to guess,
00:23:40.260 I'd say you were a
00:23:40.900 Chinese agent with
00:23:41.940 that idea.
00:23:43.160 That's not any kind
00:23:44.180 of a patriotic idea.
00:23:46.460 It's the worst idea
00:23:47.580 of all time.
00:23:49.540 Protests, good.
00:23:51.300 Protests, good.
00:23:53.400 Safe protest.
00:23:54.860 Crashing the economy,
00:23:56.100 no, absolutely not.
00:23:58.160 Worst idea ever.
00:24:00.820 I don't care who's 0.99
00:24:01.520 pushing it.
00:24:02.460 It's a dumb fuck
00:24:03.380 idea.
00:24:03.760 It's like really
00:24:04.580 bad idea.
00:24:05.860 Really bad idea.
00:24:07.280 Worst idea I've ever
00:24:08.220 heard.
00:24:09.380 In the history of
00:24:10.300 ideas, it's the worst
00:24:11.300 one.
00:24:13.380 All right, here's the
00:24:14.760 other thing we're not
00:24:15.340 talking about.
00:24:16.660 Why is this not a
00:24:17.720 race story?
00:24:18.840 Because the prosecutor
00:24:19.880 is Elvin Bragg.
00:24:21.860 He's a black man.
00:24:23.720 Trump is usually
00:24:26.100 unfairly accused of
00:24:27.500 being a giant racist.
00:24:28.900 You don't think race
00:24:29.740 has anything to do
00:24:30.540 with this?
00:24:31.860 You don't think if
00:24:32.680 the roles were
00:24:33.520 reversed, that's all
00:24:34.800 we'd be talking about?
00:24:36.060 Of course we would.
00:24:37.560 Of course we would.
00:24:38.560 And of course it's
00:24:39.320 racial.
00:24:40.000 It's not entirely
00:24:40.860 racial.
00:24:41.420 It's more political
00:24:42.220 than racial.
00:24:43.200 But it's also racial.
00:24:45.640 It's also racial.
00:24:48.280 So Soros indirectly
00:24:50.260 funded Elvin Bragg and
00:24:52.620 other so-called
00:24:54.000 progressive prosecutors.
00:24:55.720 And I guess the way
00:24:57.120 it's done is, at least
00:24:58.640 in part, is through an
00:24:59.880 organization called
00:25:01.160 Color of Change.
00:25:03.660 Color of Change.
00:25:05.080 So I read that today
00:25:06.360 and I thought, well,
00:25:07.080 who are they?
00:25:08.160 So Color of Change is
00:25:09.600 a group who has both
00:25:13.400 white and black
00:25:14.100 numbers and they're
00:25:15.460 fighting for a variety
00:25:17.440 of social improvements
00:25:19.240 that could broadly be
00:25:21.320 called systemic racism.
00:25:22.560 So some of the things
00:25:24.720 which this group has
00:25:25.600 accomplished is getting
00:25:27.600 NCAA athletes paid in
00:25:29.460 California.
00:25:31.220 Getting them paid for
00:25:32.420 racial justice.
00:25:34.520 Because there are so
00:25:35.620 many black athletes, I
00:25:36.580 guess.
00:25:37.980 That's real important
00:25:39.240 work that I don't think
00:25:41.340 anybody cared about.
00:25:43.160 Nobody.
00:25:44.600 And let's see, what
00:25:46.340 else have they done?
00:25:47.160 Some valuable stuff.
00:25:49.720 They've stopped some
00:25:50.800 apps that were
00:25:51.660 predatory lending.
00:25:54.360 And they've stopped
00:25:55.300 weddings at plantation
00:25:56.500 sites.
00:25:57.680 So no more weddings at
00:25:58.740 places where slavery
00:25:59.780 was a thing.
00:26:01.720 Those are the things
00:26:02.700 that are listed.
00:26:04.280 But then there are
00:26:05.200 also things where
00:26:06.500 they're trying to get
00:26:07.520 progressive candidates
00:26:11.160 elected.
00:26:12.840 So apparently that's
00:26:16.440 happened.
00:26:17.640 Now, how is this not
00:26:21.020 racist?
00:26:22.480 It's racist, right?
00:26:24.200 It's an entire
00:26:24.780 organization working for
00:26:26.500 one group.
00:26:29.780 And I looked at a
00:26:31.400 picture of the people
00:26:32.840 who worked for them.
00:26:33.760 And I was pleased that
00:26:36.000 with the group photo,
00:26:37.200 there were a number of
00:26:37.940 white faces who were
00:26:40.260 also working for justice.
00:26:42.420 And they were working
00:26:43.360 together as a group.
00:26:44.720 And I wondered to
00:26:45.540 myself, huh, if the
00:26:47.840 actual number of people
00:26:48.880 actually had a pretty
00:26:49.960 good number, I don't
00:26:51.100 know, maybe 20% or
00:26:52.160 something.
00:26:53.000 I mean, that's pretty
00:26:53.860 significant.
00:26:55.000 20% looked like they 0.98
00:26:56.260 were white.
00:26:56.940 But then I looked at
00:26:57.940 the official documentation
00:27:00.440 for the group.
00:27:02.020 I don't think there are
00:27:02.940 any white people when
00:27:05.100 they advertise their
00:27:05.980 group.
00:27:07.900 Just sort of a racist
00:27:09.480 thing.
00:27:10.140 They just show the
00:27:11.020 black faces as members
00:27:12.400 of the group.
00:27:12.920 But when they actually do
00:27:13.780 a photograph, they do
00:27:16.040 have a good number of
00:27:17.220 white members.
00:27:19.720 Interesting that they
00:27:20.580 wouldn't focus on them
00:27:21.400 or show that it's a
00:27:23.020 bipartisan group.
00:27:24.720 I mean, you'd think
00:27:25.260 it'd be stronger if it
00:27:26.160 were bipartisan, right?
00:27:27.840 So anyway, it looks
00:27:28.940 like a racist group.
00:27:31.020 But not all racism is
00:27:33.060 poorly intended.
00:27:34.360 It might have good
00:27:35.000 intentions.
00:27:37.040 But a lot of racism
00:27:38.120 happens just sort of
00:27:39.680 because that's the way
00:27:41.300 the world works.
00:27:41.980 All right.
00:27:46.040 Somebody named John
00:27:47.880 Anthony Castro, who
00:27:49.600 apparently has a million
00:27:50.540 dollars to waste, he's
00:27:52.620 talking about the fact
00:27:53.420 that Trump said, asked
00:27:56.100 people to protest his
00:27:58.040 coming election or his
00:27:59.660 coming indictment.
00:28:01.940 Now, is Trump saying
00:28:03.580 protest, just that one
00:28:05.140 word, protest, is that
00:28:07.940 suggesting people should
00:28:09.920 do illegal and dangerous
00:28:11.500 things?
00:28:12.740 When you hear the word
00:28:13.520 protest in the United
00:28:14.680 States, do you just
00:28:15.560 immediately think, oh,
00:28:16.600 danger, violence?
00:28:18.440 Or do you think it's the
00:28:20.320 basis upon which our
00:28:21.760 country is built, the
00:28:23.340 most fundamental right
00:28:24.560 we have, of free speech
00:28:26.320 and protest?
00:28:27.460 Now, I think that calling
00:28:28.740 for protest is entirely
00:28:32.300 fair, whether it's a good
00:28:35.620 idea or not.
00:28:37.160 All right?
00:28:37.460 That's a separate
00:28:38.000 question.
00:28:38.860 It might not be a good
00:28:39.860 idea.
00:28:40.940 I think it would be a bad
00:28:41.900 idea, actually.
00:28:42.520 I think that a good
00:28:43.960 idea would be to let it
00:28:46.300 play out and then Trump
00:28:47.960 wins in the landslide
00:28:48.920 because it's so obvious
00:28:50.040 that the system is corrupt.
00:28:53.540 That would be the way I'd
00:28:54.780 do it.
00:28:55.640 Now, I think protest can
00:28:56.940 also be verbally, meaning
00:28:58.940 that people like me can say,
00:29:01.040 oh, this is clearly, you
00:29:02.760 know, nothing like justice,
00:29:04.520 not even close.
00:29:05.300 So I don't want to, you
00:29:07.480 know, suggest that anybody
00:29:08.500 hits the streets.
00:29:10.060 But I guess there's some
00:29:12.780 concern that they might.
00:29:13.960 So this Twitter user,
00:29:15.560 John Anthony Castro, says,
00:29:17.380 New Yorkers, if they try to
00:29:19.460 January 6th, a New York
00:29:21.400 courthouse, show up with
00:29:23.520 bats.
00:29:24.620 Time to put these MAGA
00:29:26.000 MFers in their place. 0.99
00:29:29.360 I'm donating $1 million
00:29:30.800 toward armed security.
00:29:33.200 No more Fing around. 0.98
00:29:34.940 If we're going to take
00:29:36.340 this prick down, we have
00:29:38.020 to do it together.
00:29:40.500 Now, my first thought
00:29:43.520 about this is that no
00:29:47.400 story that involves bats
00:29:49.260 ever works out just the
00:29:51.880 way you hope it would.
00:29:53.940 First observation.
00:29:55.280 That's more of a
00:29:55.860 simulation thing.
00:29:57.160 As soon as the word bats
00:29:58.940 is part of the story, you
00:30:01.160 know this isn't going to
00:30:02.000 go in a good direction.
00:30:02.900 Nothing good started with
00:30:05.940 bats.
00:30:08.000 Can you think of any
00:30:08.820 happy story that started
00:30:09.980 with bats flew out of a
00:30:12.920 cage and dropped money on
00:30:15.260 everybody?
00:30:16.240 No.
00:30:16.680 No.
00:30:17.100 Never.
00:30:18.660 Bats were used in this
00:30:21.300 battle between...
00:30:22.240 No.
00:30:22.540 No good.
00:30:23.360 No.
00:30:23.680 Nothing with bats.
00:30:25.060 Bats.
00:30:25.320 But I thought this was a
00:30:28.920 great, great idea by the...
00:30:31.920 By probably a Democrat.
00:30:33.740 Because if you're going to
00:30:35.020 take on the greatest
00:30:36.840 supporters of the Second
00:30:37.940 Amendment, the way to do it
00:30:39.700 is with bats.
00:30:42.000 And let me extend that.
00:30:44.260 If ever there comes a civil
00:30:45.740 war between red and blue
00:30:47.600 America, do not take your
00:30:50.700 ARs, if you have them,
00:30:52.240 Democrats.
00:30:52.560 Take your bats.
00:30:55.160 Those bats are really going
00:30:56.680 to be effective against the
00:30:58.040 people who are the biggest
00:30:59.820 proponents of the Second
00:31:00.920 Amendment.
00:31:02.520 So good luck with that.
00:31:04.920 Now, I do not recommend
00:31:06.200 violence with bats or guns
00:31:09.080 or anything else.
00:31:10.200 In fact, I don't even think
00:31:11.220 you should hit the streets
00:31:12.900 about this.
00:31:14.380 But Batman, I'm going to just
00:31:20.060 call him Batman, John
00:31:21.860 Anthony Castro.
00:31:23.360 So Batman has a plan that
00:31:25.220 might be the worst plan I've
00:31:26.500 ever heard, but I do hope he
00:31:27.680 spends a million dollars on
00:31:29.240 armed security, because that
00:31:31.260 would be funny.
00:31:33.080 I'd just like him to spend a
00:31:34.460 million dollars on armed
00:31:35.420 security.
00:31:36.940 All right.
00:31:37.540 Remember I said that maybe
00:31:38.680 the only way to do something
00:31:40.180 about fentanyl demand, just on
00:31:43.180 the demand side, would be to
00:31:45.180 provide fentanyl for free and
00:31:48.500 make it cheaper than the
00:31:49.680 cartels and maybe put them 0.50
00:31:51.800 out of business.
00:31:53.060 Turns out that Vancouver is
00:31:55.240 doing exactly that.
00:31:57.120 So Vancouver is doing some
00:31:58.500 kind of...
00:31:58.820 Oh, there we go.
00:31:59.940 We're back.
00:32:01.120 So the idea would be that if
00:32:03.420 you had a prescription, you
00:32:04.240 could get fentanyl powder, but
00:32:05.960 the quality control and the
00:32:07.460 quantity would be carefully
00:32:09.540 controlled so that the odds of
00:32:12.120 getting an overdose would be
00:32:13.960 much lower.
00:32:18.660 And apparently substituting
00:32:20.600 fentanyl for anything won't
00:32:23.040 work.
00:32:23.920 Do you know why?
00:32:25.180 Do you know why you can't say,
00:32:26.420 hey, hey, we won't give you
00:32:27.500 fentanyl, but here's this free
00:32:29.480 cocaine or free heroin or
00:32:31.880 something like that?
00:32:33.080 Do you know why?
00:32:34.540 It's because the fentanyl is
00:32:35.540 better.
00:32:36.580 So the people who are addicts,
00:32:37.960 they're not going to do the
00:32:40.980 second choice.
00:32:43.160 They're just not going to do
00:32:44.040 that.
00:32:44.860 So they do need the fentanyl or
00:32:46.640 they're just going to get it
00:32:47.560 illegally because the illegal
00:32:48.880 fentanyl would be better than
00:32:50.120 legal heroin or legal anything.
00:32:53.860 So you're going to have to meet
00:32:55.400 them at fentanyl or they're just
00:32:56.760 going to go get it.
00:32:57.560 So all I will say about this is
00:33:06.360 that I'm glad somebody's trying
00:33:08.160 it.
00:33:09.380 I'm glad somebody's trying it.
00:33:11.460 Now, if you ask me, would you bet
00:33:13.620 that this will work?
00:33:15.020 I'd probably bet against it.
00:33:17.100 And the only reason I'd bet against
00:33:18.460 it is that everything we've tried
00:33:20.100 hasn't worked.
00:33:21.460 Am I right?
00:33:22.860 It wouldn't even matter what it
00:33:24.340 was if it sounded like the best
00:33:25.900 idea in the world, the best idea
00:33:28.260 in the world, I'd still say,
00:33:30.620 well, nothing's ever worked
00:33:32.320 before, so probably not this.
00:33:34.140 But you have to try it.
00:33:36.380 Somebody's got to try it.
00:33:37.600 So I say, you know, standing
00:33:40.600 ovation to Vancouver for putting
00:33:42.800 themselves out there trying
00:33:44.120 something.
00:33:45.380 Could work.
00:33:46.640 I wouldn't rule it out.
00:33:48.360 Could work.
00:33:49.880 I was reminded in the comments to
00:33:51.800 back up on the Trump indictment
00:33:54.600 indictment story.
00:33:56.400 So Vivek Ramaswamy is calling
00:33:58.240 for Republican candidates to
00:34:00.900 disavow or to, you know, talk
00:34:04.840 out against this illegal-looking
00:34:07.180 indictment.
00:34:08.540 I won't say illegal-looking.
00:34:10.160 Let me say that it's obviously a
00:34:12.020 political indictment.
00:34:14.080 Obviously a political indictment.
00:34:15.780 Everybody can see it.
00:34:17.260 Well, everybody who pays attention
00:34:18.580 can see it.
00:34:19.220 So, and I was reminded to say that
00:34:23.960 Vivek is picking up free money.
00:34:26.020 Absolutely.
00:34:27.240 Yeah.
00:34:27.580 So that's another smart, just a smart
00:34:30.900 play by Vivek.
00:34:32.320 Because if you're a Republican and
00:34:35.040 you're not speaking out against a
00:34:37.540 political arrest of the most
00:34:39.880 prominent Republican, if you're not
00:34:43.060 talking out about that, you do not
00:34:45.520 deserve to run for office.
00:34:46.760 I'm sorry, the minimum bar for being
00:34:50.920 a, you know, let's say a national
00:34:53.680 credible Republican is to disavow
00:34:57.900 this.
00:34:58.880 If you can't say that out loud and
00:35:00.820 right away, with no hedging
00:35:02.660 whatsoever, you cannot be a
00:35:05.400 president.
00:35:06.240 Or at least you're not going to get
00:35:07.220 votes from Republicans.
00:35:08.660 Now this puts DeSantis in an
00:35:10.400 interesting situation.
00:35:12.860 Because I saw Mike Cernovich say
00:35:15.020 that he could, DeSantis could, you
00:35:17.820 know, try to work against the
00:35:20.120 federal government jurisdiction,
00:35:23.420 you know, try to, try to do some
00:35:24.840 jurisdiction thing.
00:35:26.660 I don't think it would work.
00:35:28.640 And I don't think that, I don't think
00:35:30.760 that Mike Cernovich thinks it would
00:35:32.180 work.
00:35:32.860 But it might be the right look.
00:35:35.180 Might be the right look.
00:35:36.700 You know, it's free money.
00:35:38.260 Just pick it up and say you'll do
00:35:39.720 whatever you can to stop it from
00:35:41.040 happening because it's obviously a
00:35:42.360 political thing.
00:35:43.020 Now, it won't make any difference
00:35:45.780 in the real world, but at least
00:35:47.780 you'd be throwing down your marker
00:35:49.400 and saying, all right, I say this is
00:35:51.460 wrong.
00:35:52.740 And it's stronger.
00:35:54.380 It's stronger because he'd be
00:35:55.920 talking about somebody who's
00:35:56.860 potentially, you know, his
00:35:58.580 strongest competitor to be
00:35:59.920 president.
00:36:01.020 So if DeSantis can't say out loud,
00:36:05.380 strongly, and fairly soon, this
00:36:07.860 isn't right, this is political, it's
00:36:09.840 got to end, whether or not he tries
00:36:12.360 to stop it with some, you know,
00:36:14.000 Florida law that is separate.
00:36:15.300 But if he can't say that full-throated,
00:36:19.300 he's not qualified to be president,
00:36:22.160 in my opinion.
00:36:23.140 That would be disqualifying.
00:36:25.240 And I think that it's just another
00:36:26.640 example where Vivek Ramaswamy is
00:36:30.220 doing smart things right in front of
00:36:33.440 you.
00:36:34.680 I'm not sure you could get elected
00:36:36.120 doing smart things.
00:36:37.600 I hate to say it, but, you know, if
00:36:39.620 you did only smart things, I don't
00:36:41.220 know if the public would get
00:36:44.040 inspired.
00:36:45.020 Sometimes they need a little, you
00:36:46.520 know, red meat.
00:36:49.100 But anyway, good to anybody who's
00:36:51.520 smart enough to take the free money
00:36:52.960 and denounce it on the Republican
00:36:55.260 side.
00:36:56.680 All right, here's another idea for
00:36:58.640 dealing with the cartels, but I'll
00:37:01.600 update you with what Peter Zayen says
00:37:06.040 about the cartels at the moment.
00:37:08.200 Now, I've been asked by members of
00:37:10.020 the audience, and thank you for
00:37:12.320 doing that, that I should see what
00:37:13.920 Peter Zayen says about this whole
00:37:15.540 cartel fentanyl business.
00:37:18.140 And so I did.
00:37:19.540 Now, his point of view, I have not
00:37:21.380 heard anywhere else.
00:37:24.480 But I think he knows what he's
00:37:26.620 talking about.
00:37:27.560 So I'm going to give you the caveat
00:37:28.980 that I don't know that this is true,
00:37:31.640 because it's still a single source.
00:37:33.420 But it is a single source from a
00:37:35.540 smart, connected person I don't
00:37:38.000 think has a reason to lie.
00:37:39.940 And it goes like this.
00:37:41.900 The image that I had of the
00:37:44.780 cartels was that there might be two
00:37:47.060 or three big ones, and they've sort
00:37:49.560 of reached a kind of a sort of a
00:37:52.840 mafia-like agreement about who has
00:37:54.580 what territory.
00:37:55.840 So in effect, one or more of them
00:37:58.280 could control the government and the
00:38:00.520 border and everything else.
00:38:01.560 But basically, the cartels were like
00:38:03.580 this big, well-managed, you know,
00:38:06.240 solid industry.
00:38:08.140 And then there were a few of them,
00:38:09.620 and they'd reached some kind of a
00:38:10.900 balancing point where they weren't
00:38:12.220 fighting each other so much.
00:38:13.740 They were just sort of controlling
00:38:14.940 their domains.
00:38:16.220 Turns out that's all wrong.
00:38:18.360 All wrong.
00:38:19.800 Apparently, and I hope I have this
00:38:22.240 right, that when the U.S.
00:38:24.320 got El Chapo, his cartel sort of
00:38:30.300 disintegrated into warring factions
00:38:32.220 trying to take over what was left.
00:38:34.800 So now the biggest one became a bunch
00:38:36.940 of warring factions.
00:38:38.520 The smaller ones apparently also are
00:38:41.300 more characterized as thugs, you know,
00:38:44.920 warring with each other.
00:38:46.160 And that the reason that the murder rate
00:38:49.180 is currently so high is because the
00:38:51.880 cartels do not have control.
00:38:53.560 Isn't that a, you know, mind effort?
00:38:59.120 I always thought it was because the
00:39:00.940 cartels had control that they were just
00:39:04.100 killing anybody they could kill, you 0.98
00:39:05.520 know, willy-nilly.
00:39:06.500 But apparently when El Chapo was in
00:39:08.720 control, the murder rate went way down
00:39:11.480 because they didn't want trouble.
00:39:13.580 They just wanted to run as business.
00:39:16.500 So apparently the Sinaloa cartel was
00:39:18.280 like a business.
00:39:19.120 What's left is more like gangs.
00:39:23.000 So the situation has degenerated from
00:39:25.460 something like a business of selling
00:39:28.040 drugs to gang selling drugs.
00:39:31.360 And that now it's just violence and
00:39:33.220 inter-fighting.
00:39:35.740 Now, under that situation, you would have
00:39:38.440 to deal with them a little bit
00:39:39.440 differently.
00:39:40.940 I was thinking that if there really are
00:39:43.200 big cartels that you could negotiate
00:39:45.240 with, you could actually negotiate with
00:39:47.360 them, just like a country, and just say,
00:39:50.600 look, we're bigger than you, we are
00:39:52.540 going to crush you, you need to do
00:39:55.020 something different.
00:39:56.720 And then, you know, at least make the
00:39:59.060 offer before you crush them.
00:40:00.800 It seems like the sporting thing to do.
00:40:03.620 But if it's really a bunch of disjoint
00:40:05.980 people fighting for power, that's a
00:40:08.620 whole different deal.
00:40:10.180 So let me suggest a strategy that
00:40:14.600 matches that situation.
00:40:18.240 Instead of invading with the military,
00:40:21.300 you simply put whatever assets in
00:40:24.140 place that you need to, to know what
00:40:26.080 all of the cartel people are doing.
00:40:28.320 And then whenever you see something, you
00:40:29.880 tell the other cartels, hey, looks like
00:40:32.740 this cartel has got a little action going
00:40:34.480 over here, just letting you know.
00:40:37.200 Hey, it looks like there's a big shipment
00:40:40.140 that just came out of the Sinaloa group
00:40:42.820 and it's on this highway, heading
00:40:45.060 toward the border, in case you want to
00:40:47.380 stop it.
00:40:49.080 Somebody says there's a movie called
00:40:50.520 Sicario where they did that.
00:40:52.300 I don't know that movie.
00:40:53.900 Now, I'm not saying this is a good idea.
00:40:57.060 But if you knew that the cartels were
00:41:00.100 breaking into factions and infighting,
00:41:03.300 would you ask yourself, are we already
00:41:06.160 doing that?
00:41:06.840 Are we already doing it?
00:41:11.220 And why wouldn't we?
00:41:13.600 I presume that U.S.
00:41:16.400 intelligence assets are operating in
00:41:18.340 Mexico.
00:41:19.080 Don't you?
00:41:20.200 Don't you think we have some CIA or
00:41:23.080 something going on in Mexico involving
00:41:25.140 the cartels?
00:41:26.220 I assume so.
00:41:27.620 Of course we do, right?
00:41:29.000 Now, what would be the best thing you
00:41:31.220 could do if you couldn't move your own
00:41:32.640 assets in?
00:41:34.020 Well, you don't want the cartels to get
00:41:36.000 so powerful that they are literally
00:41:40.380 like a country, forming their own
00:41:42.420 armies and stuff.
00:41:43.780 So the first thing you do is give them
00:41:45.320 all information about the other ones
00:41:46.880 and just keep it coming.
00:41:48.720 And just make them fight with each
00:41:50.180 other, give them some rumors.
00:41:51.940 Hey, did you know this other faction is
00:41:53.920 planning to move against you?
00:41:55.960 I don't know.
00:41:56.880 Yeah, they're really serious.
00:41:58.680 I don't know.
00:41:59.280 Your best bet might be to move against
00:42:00.800 them first.
00:42:02.160 You know, take the first shot.
00:42:03.900 So there's a part of me that wonders
00:42:05.920 if there's any part of our military or
00:42:08.880 intelligence agencies that are already
00:42:11.160 breaking up the cartels into small parts
00:42:14.260 by rumors and information and
00:42:18.100 narcing on one group versus the other.
00:42:20.420 It kind of looks like it.
00:42:24.260 So I'm not going to say that's what's
00:42:25.800 happening, but why wouldn't it?
00:42:30.060 I mean, why wouldn't it?
00:42:31.080 It's the obvious thing to do, isn't it?
00:42:33.220 It's the most obvious thing to do.
00:42:35.360 So I'm going to say it's not a suggestion.
00:42:39.040 It looks like it's happening.
00:42:41.540 And I don't know where that's going to end
00:42:43.840 up, but it looks like it's happening.
00:42:45.100 And I also heard, let me see if you
00:42:50.980 think this is true.
00:42:53.620 Remember, we always used to hear about
00:42:55.180 the Crips and the Bloods.
00:42:58.680 You know, it was like, you hear about it
00:42:59.980 all the time.
00:43:01.360 And I don't hear about it so much.
00:43:05.080 At least in Southern California, I don't
00:43:06.980 hear about it so much.
00:43:08.520 And there's some speculation that the
00:43:11.020 MS-13 wiped them out and just killed
00:43:13.760 all the people who were competitors.
00:43:16.420 Now, obviously, they still exist, of
00:43:18.300 course.
00:43:19.140 But I wonder if MS-13 actually wiped out
00:43:21.720 their drug competition.
00:43:25.800 Yeah.
00:43:27.560 Now, I would have trouble believing that
00:43:31.160 anything thorough happened, like all the
00:43:34.040 drug business went away.
00:43:35.700 I don't think that.
00:43:36.900 But I wonder if there's anything to that,
00:43:38.400 that the MS-13 got rid of the rival gangs.
00:43:42.480 Because that is the first thing they do.
00:43:44.080 They get rid of the rival gangs so they can
00:43:45.700 take over the business.
00:43:47.600 I don't know.
00:43:48.920 I'm not sure I believe anything about that.
00:43:53.020 Here's a question for you.
00:43:55.480 If someday we have chips in our skulls,
00:43:58.980 you know, microchips or little computers
00:44:00.880 in our skulls, that's what, you know,
00:44:02.820 Neuralink is trying to do.
00:44:04.160 I'm sure others will do it.
00:44:06.660 Will we get to the point where robots
00:44:08.280 can read your mind?
00:44:12.980 I think so.
00:44:14.200 Because robots will have AI in them,
00:44:16.320 eventually.
00:44:17.320 Wouldn't you agree?
00:44:18.840 Of course a robot will have AI.
00:44:21.500 Now, if you have AI,
00:44:24.120 can't you hack any password?
00:44:26.880 If you had AI and maybe a connection
00:44:29.800 to a quantum computer?
00:44:33.780 Yeah, right.
00:44:34.480 If the AI had connection to a quantum computer
00:44:37.320 and also had all full AI,
00:44:40.640 it could kind of crack any password
00:44:42.240 or encryption.
00:44:44.460 And could it pick up a signal
00:44:45.940 from the chip in your head?
00:44:47.580 And could your robot walk up to you,
00:44:49.420 read your signal, and say,
00:44:51.060 Oh, I see you would like a glass of water.
00:44:55.480 I'll get one.
00:44:56.280 Now, that's the good news.
00:44:58.680 But suppose you committed a crime
00:45:02.080 and you died in the commission of the crime.
00:45:06.080 Do you think your chip
00:45:07.300 will remember the memories of what happened?
00:45:11.780 Because we do know now
00:45:13.060 that you can assemble a memory
00:45:15.560 by scanning somebody's brain.
00:45:18.640 You know that's real, right?
00:45:20.000 That's an actual real thing.
00:45:22.520 If you knew how to scan
00:45:24.260 or monitor somebody's brain,
00:45:26.760 you can actually reassemble their memories.
00:45:30.760 Like in picture form.
00:45:33.020 So in theory,
00:45:34.800 you could take a dead guy,
00:45:36.440 take his chip out,
00:45:37.480 and if it had any memory in it,
00:45:38.780 we don't know if they'd have memory,
00:45:40.300 but presumably someday they'll have memory, right?
00:45:43.600 And you could actually read the memories.
00:45:46.820 I believe that's current technology.
00:45:50.000 It's not operational,
00:45:51.880 like not commercialized current technology,
00:45:54.160 but every part of that has been demonstrated,
00:45:56.900 I think.
00:45:59.140 Now, is there any situation
00:46:01.860 where you'd have a chip in your head
00:46:03.280 and the chip in your head
00:46:05.480 did not communicate with the rest of the world?
00:46:07.640 Because that would be its best benefit.
00:46:11.200 It could communicate with the world.
00:46:13.260 So it's got to be sending out some signal.
00:46:15.960 So pretty soon you'll have a signal
00:46:17.760 and an artificial memory in your head.
00:46:20.080 Maybe not, you know, version one, two, or three.
00:46:22.520 But I think you're going to have
00:46:23.940 some kind of memory chip in your head.
00:46:28.660 Yeah.
00:46:29.820 So I don't know what the future looks like.
00:46:32.320 You know, I do agree with,
00:46:34.900 well, I agree with what I imagine
00:46:37.460 Elon Musk is thinking.
00:46:39.940 So this is not mind reading,
00:46:41.280 it's a speculation again.
00:46:43.520 I think that he probably says
00:46:45.160 it's going to happen no matter what,
00:46:47.520 save with AI.
00:46:48.520 It's going to happen no matter what.
00:46:50.520 And if he's involved,
00:46:51.940 maybe he can keep it more ethical.
00:46:54.860 But it's going to happen.
00:46:56.700 So you might as well,
00:46:57.660 if you're not an unethical person,
00:46:59.500 well, maybe it's best
00:47:00.920 that you're the one who's making it happen.
00:47:03.060 At least you have a chance that way.
00:47:05.800 That's what I speculate he thinks.
00:47:07.680 I'm not reading his mind.
00:47:09.920 All right, let's read his mind this time.
00:47:12.880 All right, this time we're going to read his mind.
00:47:15.000 All right.
00:47:16.280 I went from speculating to this time
00:47:18.340 I'm going to read Elon Musk's mind.
00:47:20.480 And you can all join me, just for fun.
00:47:23.140 Here's the story.
00:47:24.580 He just, he tweeted down a meme
00:47:28.060 early this morning.
00:47:29.500 As in the middle of the night.
00:47:31.980 And the meme said,
00:47:33.280 without any explanation,
00:47:35.540 the meme said,
00:47:36.920 falling in love hits different
00:47:38.260 when you know they're a paid actor
00:47:40.160 sent by the CIA
00:47:41.260 to distract you from dedicating your life
00:47:44.020 to dismantling the government.
00:47:48.420 What does that mean?
00:47:52.160 Falling in love hits different
00:47:53.600 when you know they're a paid actor
00:47:56.020 sent by the CIA to distract you
00:47:58.120 from dedicating your life
00:47:59.760 to dismantling the government?
00:48:01.220 First of all,
00:48:03.400 is Elon Musk
00:48:04.380 dismantling the government?
00:48:08.240 I mean,
00:48:08.840 in a way,
00:48:10.180 in a way, yes.
00:48:12.040 In a literal way, no.
00:48:15.000 But in a conceptual way, yes,
00:48:17.180 through the Twitter files.
00:48:18.260 But do you think that he had
00:48:23.260 some recent experience
00:48:24.720 with somebody he thought
00:48:26.100 was sent by the CIA
00:48:27.220 to act like his girlfriend?
00:48:31.720 Of course he did.
00:48:34.040 Of course.
00:48:34.880 Do you think the CIA
00:48:36.820 isn't trying to get into
00:48:37.960 Elon Musk's personal life?
00:48:40.840 Well, I assume they are.
00:48:45.980 Now, I doubt
00:48:46.760 that they would send somebody
00:48:48.440 I doubt they would
00:48:51.180 send somebody
00:48:52.280 who was like
00:48:52.700 on the payroll.
00:48:53.980 I don't think they'd do that.
00:48:55.960 I think it's more like
00:48:56.960 somebody they know
00:48:58.620 would tell them stuff.
00:49:01.420 Yeah, somebody
00:49:02.020 associated with, perhaps,
00:49:04.620 in some way.
00:49:06.560 Yeah.
00:49:07.480 Now, I don't know
00:49:08.580 if that's what he means.
00:49:09.380 Do you think there's
00:49:10.040 another meaning to this?
00:49:11.480 Because it could be
00:49:12.140 just a metaphor
00:49:13.180 for something that's
00:49:14.940 happening in the news.
00:49:16.460 Do you think it's just
00:49:17.120 a metaphor for something
00:49:18.140 happening in the news?
00:49:20.120 Or do you think
00:49:20.940 he's telling you
00:49:21.600 that they sent somebody
00:49:22.600 and he found out?
00:49:24.840 Or he figured it out?
00:49:29.340 What do you think?
00:49:31.480 I don't know.
00:49:32.020 I just love the fact
00:49:33.260 that we don't know.
00:49:35.100 Like, it's open
00:49:36.000 to interpretation.
00:49:39.380 I don't know.
00:49:40.660 But I'd be surprised
00:49:41.600 if they didn't send somebody.
00:49:43.900 Wouldn't you be surprised?
00:49:45.660 Because I would think
00:49:46.520 the CIA would wonder,
00:49:48.400 huh, I hope he's
00:49:49.680 totally on our side.
00:49:51.700 You know, is he ever,
00:49:52.940 is he ever not on our side?
00:49:55.660 I feel like the CIA
00:49:56.980 would want to know
00:49:57.720 as much as they could
00:49:58.640 know about him
00:49:59.780 and his business.
00:50:01.240 Just to, you know,
00:50:02.760 just to be careful.
00:50:03.640 because he has
00:50:04.600 so much influence,
00:50:06.180 you want to make sure
00:50:07.060 that he's not influenced
00:50:08.160 by somebody
00:50:09.700 from outside America.
00:50:12.300 I don't know.
00:50:14.160 I don't know.
00:50:15.160 I guess we'll probably
00:50:15.940 never know the answer
00:50:16.960 to what this is,
00:50:17.800 but it's intriguing.
00:50:19.600 All right.
00:50:21.800 Article in,
00:50:22.660 one of the news,
00:50:24.200 was it CNN?
00:50:25.060 I think,
00:50:27.060 according to Pew Research,
00:50:29.160 63% of men
00:50:30.620 between 18 and 29
00:50:32.000 are single.
00:50:34.100 That means the number
00:50:35.400 of single young men
00:50:36.460 is nearly twice as that
00:50:37.860 of single young women.
00:50:41.200 What?
00:50:44.160 What?
00:50:46.000 How is that possible?
00:50:49.420 Do the math.
00:50:50.540 How is that possible?
00:50:55.080 Lesbianism? 0.99
00:50:55.920 No.
00:50:56.380 The only way
00:51:02.000 I can see this
00:51:02.640 is possible
00:51:03.180 is that the young women
00:51:04.320 are with older men.
00:51:06.240 They're dating older men.
00:51:08.820 Is that the answer?
00:51:10.960 And why do you think
00:51:11.980 that younger women 1.00
00:51:13.160 are presumably
00:51:15.280 more than ever
00:51:16.380 dating older men?
00:51:20.140 Why do you think
00:51:20.960 that is?
00:51:22.360 Do you think
00:51:23.160 it's because
00:51:23.860 of just money?
00:51:24.980 But that was always true.
00:51:27.280 It was always true
00:51:28.240 that older men 0.97
00:51:28.940 had money.
00:51:29.880 Why would it be
00:51:30.680 so much more now?
00:51:32.540 Because the money thing
00:51:33.380 is exactly the same
00:51:34.360 as the way it's been forever.
00:51:36.300 But why would they
00:51:37.100 be dating them now?
00:51:42.260 Well,
00:51:43.000 here are some theories
00:51:43.980 that the article had.
00:51:46.500 It said dating apps
00:51:47.480 are making it impossible
00:51:48.760 for anyone
00:51:49.380 but the best-looking
00:51:51.120 people to date.
00:51:52.220 So that's true.
00:51:52.900 And then porn
00:51:55.560 is mentioned
00:51:56.120 as something
00:51:56.760 that's draining off
00:51:57.980 the energy
00:51:58.460 of some of the men
00:51:59.440 so they have
00:52:00.460 something that's
00:52:02.220 keeping them
00:52:02.680 from dating.
00:52:04.720 I would add
00:52:05.740 a few more
00:52:06.460 speculative things.
00:52:08.980 A few more.
00:52:10.100 Number one,
00:52:12.580 men between 18 and 29
00:52:14.240 are captives
00:52:15.500 of women.
00:52:17.040 In other words,
00:52:18.360 the young men
00:52:19.120 are basically
00:52:19.980 woke bitches. 1.00
00:52:22.900 And women
00:52:23.420 want two things.
00:52:26.540 Number one,
00:52:27.200 they want their men 0.53
00:52:28.420 to do what they
00:52:29.300 want them to do.
00:52:30.500 Am I right?
00:52:31.560 Women want the men 1.00
00:52:32.820 to do what they
00:52:34.260 want them to do.
00:52:35.640 Number two thing
00:52:36.460 you need to know,
00:52:37.560 no woman 0.99
00:52:38.260 is attracted
00:52:39.080 to a man
00:52:39.700 who does what
00:52:40.400 she tells them to do.
00:52:43.520 There's your whole story.
00:52:45.320 That's your whole story.
00:52:46.980 The men
00:52:47.840 in that age group
00:52:49.520 have been hypnotized
00:52:50.680 into thinking
00:52:51.320 that doing what
00:52:52.860 women want them 1.00
00:52:53.600 to do
00:52:54.100 is their ticket
00:52:55.280 to being liked
00:52:55.980 by women. 0.78
00:52:57.480 Nope.
00:52:59.280 And do you know
00:52:59.960 what?
00:53:00.200 I believe that
00:53:00.960 at that age.
00:53:02.840 What is this age?
00:53:04.100 18 to 29.
00:53:05.580 Between the ages
00:53:06.380 of 18 to 29,
00:53:08.220 I believe that
00:53:09.160 my best strategy
00:53:10.160 with women
00:53:10.780 was to be as woke
00:53:12.520 as I could possibly be.
00:53:13.700 In fact,
00:53:15.040 my first relationship,
00:53:17.060 she used to brag 0.99
00:53:18.140 to other people
00:53:19.340 that her guy
00:53:21.540 was,
00:53:23.780 what word did she use? 0.91
00:53:26.460 Like,
00:53:27.540 something like
00:53:29.840 more open-minded
00:53:30.800 or, you know,
00:53:32.200 less sexist
00:53:33.100 or something.
00:53:33.980 So I tried to be
00:53:34.900 the least sexist
00:53:36.140 person I could be
00:53:37.120 because I thought,
00:53:38.660 well, that's what
00:53:39.620 society wants.
00:53:41.180 And let me tell you,
00:53:42.000 that's sure what
00:53:43.120 women want. 1.00
00:53:43.960 And how did I know
00:53:44.720 that women wanted it
00:53:45.620 at that age?
00:53:46.440 Well, that's what
00:53:46.840 they said.
00:53:48.240 When I did things
00:53:49.280 that were, you know,
00:53:50.260 clearly showing
00:53:51.940 that I was,
00:53:53.560 what was the word
00:53:54.320 we used?
00:53:55.260 Not metrosexual.
00:53:57.060 There was a word
00:53:58.020 that was like
00:53:58.480 a diabolical word
00:53:59.780 because you wanted
00:54:00.820 to be that.
00:54:01.560 It was like,
00:54:02.460 not open-minded,
00:54:03.680 but a word like that.
00:54:06.220 Not whipped.
00:54:07.020 Not chauvinist.
00:54:10.560 Not cock,
00:54:11.440 but good guess.
00:54:12.240 Enlightened.
00:54:12.960 Enlightened.
00:54:13.260 There it was.
00:54:15.480 That was the word
00:54:16.740 that hypnotized me
00:54:19.200 for years.
00:54:21.060 Yeah.
00:54:21.440 I was called
00:54:22.260 enlightened.
00:54:24.520 Enlightened
00:54:25.040 would mean
00:54:25.700 that I would
00:54:26.880 treat my woman 1.00
00:54:28.320 like a
00:54:29.860 proper man.
00:54:31.960 Yeah.
00:54:32.600 Because everybody's
00:54:33.260 the same.
00:54:34.240 So everybody,
00:54:34.720 you treat everybody
00:54:35.600 in an enlightened way.
00:54:37.020 And that is
00:54:38.100 your ticket
00:54:38.580 to, man,
00:54:40.540 you want to get
00:54:41.280 some sex, guys?
00:54:43.060 Be enlightened.
00:54:44.480 There's nothing
00:54:45.240 the ladies like 0.99
00:54:46.040 more than that.
00:54:47.220 Am I right?
00:54:48.680 I actually believed
00:54:49.920 that in my 20s.
00:54:52.240 And, you know,
00:54:53.420 there's this long
00:54:54.120 process of getting
00:54:55.240 red-pilled
00:54:55.940 where you start
00:54:58.120 thinking,
00:54:59.300 well,
00:55:00.240 the people
00:55:01.140 who are doing
00:55:01.580 well don't seem
00:55:02.780 to be doing this.
00:55:04.680 Was that a coincidence?
00:55:05.940 And pretty soon
00:55:07.620 the anecdotal
00:55:08.840 counter-evidence
00:55:10.320 becomes overwhelming.
00:55:12.260 And then
00:55:12.860 at some point
00:55:13.480 in your life
00:55:13.960 you decide
00:55:14.900 to try it.
00:55:16.760 You know what I mean?
00:55:18.140 What if I tried
00:55:19.380 being a little less
00:55:21.840 what they call
00:55:23.600 enlightened?
00:55:26.400 And then you realize
00:55:27.560 it works great.
00:55:29.980 And you say to yourself,
00:55:31.160 I don't know
00:55:32.320 what's going on now.
00:55:34.180 Why does treating
00:55:35.140 people poorly
00:55:36.260 work so well?
00:55:37.940 Well, maybe it's not
00:55:38.800 treating people poorly.
00:55:40.760 Maybe that's not
00:55:41.620 what's happening.
00:55:43.160 Maybe treating people
00:55:44.260 in their biological truth
00:55:46.040 is actually something
00:55:47.760 that has
00:55:49.400 a mating instinct
00:55:50.840 trigger.
00:55:52.480 Maybe it does.
00:55:53.840 Maybe acting like
00:55:54.820 somebody who could
00:55:55.500 protect you
00:55:56.340 is going to be
00:55:58.740 a bigger turn-on
00:55:59.600 than somebody
00:56:00.180 who understands you.
00:56:02.980 All right,
00:56:03.580 you've got two choices,
00:56:04.600 ladies. 0.75
00:56:05.980 You can have somebody
00:56:06.740 who protects you
00:56:07.500 or somebody
00:56:08.060 who understands
00:56:08.840 and listens to your
00:56:10.020 feelings
00:56:11.900 as much as possible.
00:56:14.800 Yeah.
00:56:15.320 Of course,
00:56:16.240 women lie. 1.00
00:56:18.180 You know,
00:56:18.440 men lie too,
00:56:19.060 of course.
00:56:19.280 But women lie 1.00
00:56:20.340 and they tell you
00:56:21.120 that what they want 0.62
00:56:21.940 is an enlightened guy
00:56:23.860 who understands
00:56:25.080 the wokeness
00:56:25.920 and can march
00:56:27.700 with them
00:56:28.160 and paint their hair
00:56:29.200 green
00:56:29.560 and be a proper lady
00:56:31.540 just like they are.
00:56:32.520 That's what they're
00:56:33.020 looking for.
00:56:33.560 That turns them on.
00:56:35.480 No,
00:56:35.780 I think that
00:56:36.400 there's an entire
00:56:37.220 generation
00:56:37.820 who have been
00:56:38.740 turned into women 0.95
00:56:39.780 and the women say,
00:56:41.480 all right,
00:56:42.380 the job is done.
00:56:43.380 We've turned these
00:56:44.000 young men
00:56:44.440 into proper women. 0.92
00:56:46.000 We're not interested
00:56:46.860 in them,
00:56:47.280 of course.
00:56:48.100 But I've noticed
00:56:48.800 this older guy
00:56:49.600 who seems to be
00:56:50.260 killing it.
00:56:52.240 That's what's happening.
00:56:53.860 Now,
00:56:54.480 I have an anecdotal
00:56:56.320 experience
00:56:57.040 that I never believed
00:56:59.160 was worthy
00:57:00.640 of sharing
00:57:01.200 because it's just
00:57:02.540 so specific
00:57:03.500 and anecdotal.
00:57:04.740 It goes like this.
00:57:07.900 I've been more
00:57:08.880 attractive to women 0.99
00:57:09.800 every year I've aged,
00:57:11.780 including now.
00:57:15.340 Explain that.
00:57:16.740 Now,
00:57:17.040 I've been rich
00:57:17.720 for 25 years.
00:57:19.600 So if you're saying,
00:57:20.320 well,
00:57:20.440 it's because you got richer,
00:57:21.860 I would say,
00:57:22.700 no,
00:57:22.940 I did not get richer.
00:57:24.540 In fact,
00:57:25.320 it's probably about
00:57:25.880 the same as it was
00:57:26.580 25 years ago.
00:57:28.780 It had nothing
00:57:29.640 to do with that.
00:57:31.740 It had everything
00:57:32.720 to do with the fact
00:57:33.660 that I just stopped
00:57:35.740 caring about
00:57:36.840 ridiculous things
00:57:37.940 and just started
00:57:39.140 acting more
00:57:40.120 according to my nature,
00:57:42.140 I guess.
00:57:43.240 So you're seeing now
00:57:44.660 probably the most
00:57:46.000 accurate representation
00:57:47.260 of who I am,
00:57:48.680 as scary as that
00:57:50.140 might be.
00:57:50.680 And believe me,
00:57:53.660 men,
00:57:54.060 I think you can
00:57:54.840 concur
00:57:56.020 that if men
00:57:57.720 act honest,
00:57:58.640 it's scary.
00:58:00.540 True or false?
00:58:01.680 If men are just honest,
00:58:03.500 just honest,
00:58:04.140 they just represent
00:58:05.480 their biological nature
00:58:07.980 as best they can,
00:58:08.900 yeah,
00:58:09.100 we're scary.
00:58:10.520 There's a reason
00:58:11.300 that society
00:58:12.140 puts a lot of pressure
00:58:14.440 on keeping us
00:58:16.200 under tap.
00:58:17.340 We're just scary people.
00:58:21.600 Yeah.
00:58:23.360 So I don't think
00:58:24.260 there's too much mystery
00:58:25.160 to this millennial man
00:58:26.460 giving up on dating.
00:58:27.940 The women turned them 1.00
00:58:28.980 into women,
00:58:29.620 then the women 0.98
00:58:30.100 looked for men.
00:58:32.460 That's the whole story.
00:58:34.180 The women turned 1.00
00:58:34.940 the people their age
00:58:36.220 into women,
00:58:37.620 were no longer attracted,
00:58:39.580 and then went and found
00:58:41.220 some older men
00:58:42.180 who still acted
00:58:44.940 like something
00:58:46.120 like a biological man.
00:58:48.920 I see no disagreement
00:58:50.260 in this audience.
00:58:52.880 Almost everything
00:58:53.840 I say
00:58:54.300 has somebody
00:58:54.920 disagreeing,
00:58:55.780 and I just got
00:58:56.720 complete agreement.
00:58:57.540 I don't see
00:58:58.760 a single person
00:58:59.520 disagreeing.
00:59:03.920 Older men 0.99
00:59:04.560 know how to be kinder.
00:59:07.180 I don't know
00:59:07.860 if kindness
00:59:08.540 is a variable.
00:59:11.200 Now, Nathan,
00:59:12.560 I always had money
00:59:14.180 for 25 years,
00:59:16.240 but it's different.
00:59:19.340 There's clearly
00:59:20.300 a preference
00:59:23.040 for men
00:59:23.980 who are
00:59:24.520 more biologically
00:59:26.480 true to their nature.
00:59:28.760 That's the best way
00:59:29.560 I can talk about it,
00:59:31.000 I guess.
00:59:32.440 You say,
00:59:33.080 older men
00:59:33.520 seem more confident.
00:59:36.700 You should have
00:59:37.520 met me at 25.
00:59:39.380 Let me
00:59:39.880 challenge that belief.
00:59:43.300 If you believe
00:59:44.200 that my current self
00:59:45.320 is confident
00:59:47.300 because I'm older
00:59:48.160 or something,
00:59:49.380 you had no idea
00:59:50.480 what I was like
00:59:51.080 at 19.
00:59:52.740 If you met me
00:59:53.340 at 19,
00:59:53.900 I did not
00:59:58.120 lack confidence
00:59:59.180 at any time
01:00:00.000 in my life.
01:00:01.280 That's never
01:00:01.940 been a thing.
01:00:04.120 I did not
01:00:05.000 become confident
01:00:05.800 because I succeeded.
01:00:07.360 I was exactly
01:00:08.620 the same.
01:00:09.760 Exactly the same.
01:00:11.180 I just thought
01:00:11.820 I would succeed.
01:00:12.880 I didn't know how.
01:00:14.240 Yeah.
01:00:14.860 But if you're confident
01:00:16.280 and you haven't
01:00:17.000 actually succeeded,
01:00:18.740 then people say
01:00:19.520 you're cocky,
01:00:20.680 you're arrogant,
01:00:22.720 you're all
01:00:23.100 those things,
01:00:23.660 but I'm exactly
01:00:24.760 the same.
01:00:25.980 I have learned
01:00:26.920 that if you
01:00:27.800 actually succeed,
01:00:29.480 you have to dial it down.
01:00:31.320 It took me a while
01:00:31.940 to learn that,
01:00:32.480 by the way,
01:00:33.340 because I took
01:00:33.900 my youthful confidence
01:00:36.360 into my successful years
01:00:39.300 and it was
01:00:40.280 a terrible match
01:00:41.260 because I realized
01:00:43.000 that my sort of
01:00:44.040 cocky
01:00:45.200 presentation
01:00:47.120 of who I was,
01:00:49.400 as soon as you
01:00:50.380 actually succeed,
01:00:51.420 it's really
01:00:52.360 a turn off.
01:00:54.520 Like you have to
01:00:55.060 dial it way down
01:00:55.900 to, okay,
01:00:56.640 I'm just living
01:00:57.220 my life.
01:00:58.040 If you notice
01:00:58.840 I'm successful,
01:00:59.660 that's great,
01:01:00.540 but me,
01:01:01.040 I'm just living
01:01:01.520 my life now.
01:01:03.020 And then people
01:01:03.740 accept that
01:01:04.520 much better.
01:01:05.580 But I really
01:01:06.620 had to turn down
01:01:07.320 the cockiness
01:01:07.940 because I believed
01:01:11.440 I would succeed.
01:01:13.380 It was more
01:01:13.960 than belief.
01:01:14.760 I just,
01:01:15.880 you know,
01:01:16.140 in retrospect,
01:01:17.040 you could say,
01:01:17.580 I knew it,
01:01:18.300 but I didn't really
01:01:18.880 know it.
01:01:19.740 I just assumed it.
01:01:23.140 So,
01:01:23.780 anyway,
01:01:25.880 that,
01:01:28.460 ladies and gentlemen,
01:01:29.900 is what I wanted
01:01:30.580 to talk about.
01:01:31.240 Was there something,
01:01:31.980 I think I reminded
01:01:32.780 the locals people
01:01:34.280 on a separate thing,
01:01:36.100 there was something
01:01:36.640 I wanted to talk about
01:01:37.760 and you reminded me
01:01:38.720 last night
01:01:39.220 in the man cave.
01:01:41.380 Oh,
01:01:41.680 yes.
01:01:42.700 But I think
01:01:43.160 I mentioned this.
01:01:44.480 You're reminding me
01:01:45.340 to mention something
01:01:46.000 that I mentioned.
01:01:46.900 See if I did.
01:01:47.420 All right.
01:01:48.200 YouTube,
01:01:48.740 tell me if I already
01:01:49.340 mentioned this.
01:01:50.920 That Bill Maher
01:01:53.700 referred to,
01:01:55.740 yeah,
01:01:57.120 we're private.
01:01:58.080 That Bill Maher
01:01:58.800 referred to
01:02:00.000 DeSantis
01:02:00.940 as the tribute band.
01:02:04.580 Yeah,
01:02:05.040 I think I mentioned
01:02:05.620 it before,
01:02:06.040 right?
01:02:07.280 No?
01:02:07.980 Yes?
01:02:08.480 Well,
01:02:08.660 I'll just say it again.
01:02:10.400 Apparently,
01:02:10.960 I did mention it,
01:02:11.720 but I'm going to
01:02:12.060 just say it again.
01:02:13.020 That if you think
01:02:13.960 of DeSantis
01:02:14.480 as the tribute band
01:02:15.880 and you think
01:02:16.560 Trump is the real thing,
01:02:18.480 that is such a kill shot
01:02:20.000 that it ends
01:02:21.360 the primaries.
01:02:23.960 If Trump ever said
01:02:25.340 don't vote
01:02:26.000 for the tribute band,
01:02:28.320 it would just be
01:02:29.300 the end of it.
01:02:31.320 And by the way,
01:02:33.120 Trump would know that
01:02:34.140 the moment he heard it.
01:02:37.020 If anybody ever said
01:02:38.260 to Trump,
01:02:39.200 you know,
01:02:39.800 I would consider this.
01:02:41.660 just think about
01:02:43.760 DeSantis
01:02:44.520 as the tribute band.
01:02:46.160 You don't think
01:02:46.860 that Trump
01:02:47.280 would immediately
01:02:48.100 see the power
01:02:49.120 of that?
01:02:49.780 He would.
01:02:50.880 That's his sweet spot.
01:02:52.780 That's what he does well.
01:02:55.100 Yeah.
01:02:55.720 He's the tribute band.
01:02:59.680 All right,
01:03:00.340 so that alone
01:03:01.660 makes me think
01:03:02.440 that DeSantis
01:03:03.300 doesn't have a chance
01:03:04.260 because that play 0.61
01:03:07.720 would just be so strong
01:03:12.160 that I don't see
01:03:14.100 how he could get out
01:03:14.800 from under it.
01:03:17.860 Yeah.
01:03:20.220 There's a support rally
01:03:21.760 Tuesday at 3 p.m.
01:03:24.180 at Mar-a-Lago.
01:03:26.240 Oh, that's interesting.
01:03:27.340 That's the perfect place
01:03:28.480 to have a protest.
01:03:30.480 That's perfect.
01:03:31.620 Because if you,
01:03:32.300 oh, that's so perfect.
01:03:33.380 Let me just take a moment.
01:03:35.640 If we assume
01:03:36.680 that's going to happen,
01:03:38.280 a protest,
01:03:39.440 where would be
01:03:40.340 the perfect place
01:03:41.160 to do it?
01:03:42.380 The perfect place
01:03:43.660 would be at Mar-a-Lago.
01:03:45.360 It's the only place
01:03:46.420 somebody isn't going
01:03:47.200 to worry about violence
01:03:48.980 and nobody's going
01:03:50.400 to worry
01:03:50.840 that it turns
01:03:52.740 into something bad.
01:03:53.980 Well, that's just brilliant.
01:03:57.640 All right.
01:03:57.920 Whoever came up
01:03:58.860 with that,
01:04:00.240 A+.
01:04:00.700 A+.
01:04:02.480 That's good.
01:04:03.020 That's good stuff.
01:04:04.820 Brilliant.
01:04:07.120 All right.
01:04:10.480 Rob Reiner
01:04:11.300 already implies that.
01:04:16.320 Everyone gets
01:04:17.000 a Big Mac after?
01:04:20.240 All right.
01:04:22.000 Better do it early
01:04:22.920 in the morning?
01:04:23.540 Why is that?
01:04:24.200 Oh, because bad things
01:04:25.380 happen at night?
01:04:25.920 All right.
01:04:25.960 All right.
01:04:26.000 All right.
01:04:26.040 All right.
01:04:26.420 All right.
01:04:26.480 All right.
01:04:26.500 All right.
01:04:27.500 All right.
01:04:27.560 All right.
01:04:27.980 All right.
01:04:29.580 All right.
01:04:30.080 All right.
01:04:31.580 That's all for today,
01:04:35.720 YouTube.
01:04:36.480 I'm going to go talk
01:04:37.100 to the locals people
01:04:38.360 privately,
01:04:39.380 give them a little extra,
01:04:41.140 and I'll see you tomorrow.
01:04:42.620 All right.
01:04:42.760 All right.
01:04:43.060 All right.
01:04:43.120 All right.
01:04:43.760 All right.
01:04:43.960 All right.