Real Coffee with Scott Adams - March 20, 2023


Episode 2053 Scott Adams： Depositor Risk, AI Risk, Nigerian Hoaxers, Trump Risk, Huge Power Shift


Episode Stats


Length

56 minutes

Words per minute

148.01686

Word count

8,296

Sentence count

597

Harmful content

Misogyny

11

sentences flagged

Hate speech

26

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

ROBOTS READ NEWS is breaking and it's the funniest thing I've ever written. Trump fires his entire campaign staff and turns over the reigns of the White House to a celebrity. Elon Musk is getting rid of some bias.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Well, today's going to be a little different because it appears that the streaming is down
00:00:11.500 on the Locals platform. So I'll be here at the YouTube, hoping the Locals people see my message
00:00:20.600 and come over here and watch this for now instead. Looks like there might be some kind of upgrade
00:00:26.260 going on over there. But today will be amazing even on YouTube alone. Today we might not need,
00:00:35.160 oh my goodness, it looks as though Locals just came online. Well, you're lucky because you got
00:00:41.960 here just in time if it's really working. I can't tell yet. But if you'd like to take this
00:00:49.220 bad start for a morning to a level that has never been achieved before this morning,
00:00:56.260 all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a canteen, a jug or flask,
00:01:00.960 a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the
00:01:07.440 unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine of the day. The thing makes everything better. It's called
00:01:11.540 the simultaneous sip. It happens now. Go.
00:01:14.960 Yes, I believe Locals is working and YouTube's working and it's all coming together now. And
00:01:27.100 one big beautiful kind of thing. And it's good because today is the best show I've ever given.
00:01:34.860 Well, I mean, I'm optimistic. Feels like it's going to go that direction. I just feel it.
00:01:39.980 And probably you would like to start by knowing what's the funniest comic I've ever written
00:01:45.620 called Robots Read News. Well, apparently that was yesterday, according to my,
00:01:52.020 according to the people who read it. If you haven't seen my alternative comic, it runs
00:01:56.340 in the Locals platform. And along with Dilbert Reborn, it's all there and micro lessons and all kinds
00:02:04.200 of good stuff. But today's Robots Read News is breaking. Ex-president Donald Trump has fired
00:02:13.340 his entire campaign staff. Trump announced on Truth Social that he is turning that function over
00:02:20.080 to one volunteer he calls a, quote, superstar. His name is Alvin Bragg. Trump has affectionately
00:02:28.120 nicknamed him the cocky chipmunk. Now, if you didn't know that Alvin Bragg is the prosecutor
00:02:35.500 who's trying to get Trump. And his first name is Alvin. That sounds like a chipmunk. And 0.94
00:02:41.860 his last name is Bragg. That sounds kind of cocky. So he's the cocky chipmunk. And I think 1.00
00:02:46.920 Trump should take that nickname. Good suggestion.
00:02:49.600 So there's that. By the way, if you ever want to see a good example of how to use intonation,
00:03:02.460 let me make this private over here. I was listening to Dave Rubin, on Dave Rubin's podcast video.
00:03:12.240 And during the thing, he did a commercial. So he just read a long, boring commercial for
00:03:20.000 some product. And you have to hear Dave Rubin read boring advertising and make it sound interesting
00:03:29.680 without changing any of the words. It's actually fascinating. He does it with intonation alone.
00:03:36.620 So you can teach it, but you'd never be that good at it because he's got some kind of extra
00:03:44.640 gear going on. But I'll give you, well, let me give you an example. So if I were reading the
00:03:50.200 simultaneous sip, instead of saying a cup or a mug or a glass, if you were to do it the interesting
00:03:57.440 way, let's say it's some boring advertisement, you'd be like a cup, a mug, or even a glass,
00:04:04.360 you know, like you throw yourself into it. And you hit words, you emphasize words that
00:04:09.660 don't need to be emphasized. It's sort of the old newscaster trick. But I've never seen
00:04:15.900 anybody do it better. It's actually the best variation within a sentence that you'll ever
00:04:23.540 see. You've got to watch it just for the technique. It was fascinating. He actually made me listen
00:04:28.680 to an entire long commercial just because the technique was so good. It was actually,
00:04:35.740 it was just sort of jaw-dropping to see how good he is at that. All right, well, I feel like there's
00:04:42.300 a huge power shift happening everywhere. Are you feeling it too? It feels like everything that was
00:04:50.260 stable is becoming unstable, but it's also in the service of shifting power from one place to another.
00:04:56.560 I'm not sure it's bad. It's just different than anything I've ever seen. It's like all the power
00:05:03.580 everywhere is being redistributed, whether you like it or not. Let me give you some examples.
00:05:10.180 Would you agree that Musk buying Twitter and releasing the Twitter files and, you know,
00:05:16.200 maybe getting rid of some bias, isn't that a gigantic power shift? In a good direction, in my opinion.
00:05:22.700 But wouldn't you agree that if you were just looking at it as energy and power, that's like a big,
00:05:28.540 big shift in one ear. Here's some more. Russia. Didn't you think Russia was this big, 0.69
00:05:35.980 you know, terrible power? And now it feels like, I don't know what it is. You know, the whole Ukraine, 0.97
00:05:43.840 you know, military situation. Whether it's in the end, whether it's good or bad or whatever happens,
00:05:49.640 there's some kind of shift in power happening, for sure. So NATO's power is up. Russia's power is down.
00:05:57.700 What about AI? AI is going to change everything. I guess we've all figured that out by now.
00:06:03.700 But everything means power. People with power are going to lose it. People who didn't have it are going to get it
00:06:08.940 in ways that we can't possibly imagine yet. But huge power shift coming. How about President,
00:06:19.000 ex-President Trump being indicted? We'll talk about that more. Can you feel the power shift?
00:06:25.600 It's almost tangible, isn't it? It's almost visceral. You can feel Trump just powered up.
00:06:31.180 I don't think the left has any idea what just happened. Do you? I think everybody on the left is
00:06:39.800 just completely blind to what just happened. You can talk about that too. It's really big.
00:06:46.580 And I don't think that they can feel it yet. Surprise. And I would argue that even my situation,
00:06:56.020 my racist rant, so-called racist rant trademark, I think it opened up a hole that wasn't there
00:07:06.540 before. And you can start to see it on the internet already. You can see that the conversation is now
00:07:13.680 changed. Because I don't think anybody was talking about black people not liking white people,
00:07:20.820 because that's where the dominant narrative is training black people to dislike and disrespect
00:07:27.520 white people. Now, you couldn't say that out loud until I got cancelled. Am I right? 0.84
00:07:34.800 I think already the conversation is deepened in a better way. Because both sides... Well,
00:07:41.600 I'll talk about that a little bit more too. All right. So we'll get to all that. But actually,
00:07:48.760 let's talk about... Let's talk about that situation first.
00:07:55.740 Would you agree with the following statements? You're already seeing stuff on Twitter and in the
00:08:03.220 news that seem to be bending in my direction. Does anybody notice that yet? There's several
00:08:09.780 things being tweeted around today. The one that got everybody's attention is author...
00:08:18.740 Robin DiAngelo, who's a white woman who wrote the book White Fragility, I guess.
00:08:27.720 And she's on a Zoom call that somebody recorded, in which she's suggesting to at least two black
00:08:34.760 people and one white person, it looks, based on the Zoom, that's what it looks like.
00:08:38.700 In which she was saying that people of color need to get away from white people and have some 1.00
00:08:45.080 community with each other. And she referred to it in a separate comment, you know, in that same
00:08:51.620 segment, as affinity space. Affinity space. So the idea of sticking to yourself and your own group
00:09:01.660 would be called your affinity space, which sounds way better than segregation. I wish I'd thought of
00:09:08.160 that. Now, is it okay for Robin DiAngelo to say something like, people of color need to get away 1.00
00:09:16.120 from white people? Well, a number of people said, Scott, that's what you got canceled for. Didn't you get
00:09:21.720 canceled for that? No. No, I didn't get canceled for that. I could have said that. Anybody could have said,
00:09:28.860 anybody could have said, you know, maybe black people should stay away from white people.
00:09:34.820 Nobody gets canceled for that. You get canceled for saying it the other way. Now, the part that most
00:09:42.200 of the news and the media lost is that the reason for even bringing up the topic is that there's a
00:09:52.040 mindset thing going on. It has nothing to do with your DNA. If you ever thought I said, stay away from
00:09:58.740 anybody because their DNA or the actual color. Does anybody think I said that? Like, why would I say
00:10:07.600 that? Nobody says that. When I said that there's a, let's say, a deepening of distrust, it's because
00:10:19.080 black people are being trained by white people, by white people, as well as, you know, grifters and people 0.99
00:10:26.400 are in it for the money, being trained that white people are the problem. That's the dominant 0.99
00:10:31.300 narrative that's being taught in our schools and in our businesses and in the media. It's on TV shows.
00:10:38.180 Basically, it's everywhere. And how much, well, let me give you a parallel. I don't like to say it's an analogy.
00:10:49.380 I'll call it a parallel. It sounds better. As you know, my audience is primarily leans right, but I don't.
00:10:58.880 But I'm often respected, at least I hope so. I'm often respected by my audience for just showing my
00:11:06.060 work. And that's one of the great, you know, discoveries of the right, the political right.
00:11:13.080 As long as you're honest and show your work, disagreement's fine. I'm not forcing anybody to
00:11:19.560 agree. You know, people like to hear my view. I like to hear theirs. It's all good stuff. Now,
00:11:25.220 you might remember that I was in favor of getting rid of Confederate statues, which was not popular
00:11:31.700 at all with my audience. Now, if you need, you know, five examples of things I did that were not
00:11:38.080 popular with my audience, I could give them to you pretty easily. So could they. So it's not about,
00:11:44.000 it's obviously not about trying to please my audience. I'm trying to educate, try to make something
00:11:50.260 better. But when I said that I wanted to get rid of Confederate statues, what was my reasoning? Do
00:11:57.160 you remember? Did I say it offended me? I never said that. I said it offended black Americans in large 1.00
00:12:06.760 enough numbers that a pure appeal to politeness says you should get rid of them or put them in context,
00:12:14.880 which would be fine too. Put them in context. Now, would you put something in your own home
00:12:20.300 that you knew would be quite offensive to save 5% of the people who would ever walk through it?
00:12:26.800 I wouldn't. Would you put up art on your wall that you knew was insulting to black Americans?
00:12:35.000 Who would do that? You know, unless you were the KKK or something. So I wouldn't do it in my house
00:12:41.460 because I would care about what people felt. You know, part of living in society is not just
00:12:47.840 your bodies, you know, keep your bodies from hitting each other. It's also how you feel about
00:12:53.060 everything. And how black Americans felt and still feel by, I think, 75% majority is those statues are
00:13:02.740 just insulting and whatever, disrespectful maybe. And that's good enough for me. I don't need a better
00:13:09.500 reason. Oh, a big chunk of America finds it insulting. Okay. Let's either get rid of them
00:13:14.960 or put them in context. No problem at all. No problem at all. Now, did you see what I considered
00:13:20.660 my greatest variable in this? The variable was not about statues. That's not the variable. No,
00:13:27.860 the only variable is how did Americans that I care about, how do they feel? The way people feel
00:13:34.780 is the biggest variable is the biggest variable. It's the only one I cared about, you know, given
00:13:39.560 that expense wouldn't be a big variable. So now take my somewhat shocking and provocative statement
00:13:48.880 that if you're a white person, you're seeing a trend develop, which makes you feel very uncomfortable
00:13:55.480 around anybody woke, right? Anybody with their pronouns, because you're like, well, that's just
00:14:02.000 a problem I didn't have before. These pronoun people are going to be looking to sue me for 1.00
00:14:06.340 some damn thing. So you stay away. Perfectly reasonable. Likewise, if there's a community that
00:14:14.260 you can identify, then in some large numbers, of course, not all, of course, not all. Nobody ever means
00:14:20.560 all. But since some large number are being trained directly to feel uncomfortable about me,
00:14:28.900 then I would feel more comfortable if they got what they wanted, which is less of me.
00:14:34.560 Now, what's wrong with that? Nothing. There's nothing wrong with that. But of course, the media takes
00:14:41.300 it out of the context of me helpfully telling black Americans there's a cost to this mindset.
00:14:51.720 There might be some benefits, but don't you want to know what the cost is? The cost is I don't want
00:14:57.640 to be around anybody who has that mindset. And if I can't tell who has it, but it's being taught to
00:15:03.720 all black Americans, what the hell am I going to do? What would a reasonable person do if they thought
00:15:10.500 that black Americans were in mass being trained to dislike them? What would you do? Now, do you think
00:15:19.920 it's not useful for black Americans to know that white Americans feel they've been pushed too far,
00:15:26.800 and one of them is willing to get his whole fucking life canceled to make the point? If somebody is
00:15:33.000 willing to cancel their whole fucking situation to make the point, maybe you should listen to it. 0.87
00:15:39.440 Here's another parallel. You remember that against all of your wishes, I supported Colin Kaepernick's
00:15:48.860 protest completely. Why? Not because I agreed with everything he said, not because the data supported
00:15:58.160 his case, but because he felt it so strongly that he gave away his whole career. That I want to pay
00:16:07.160 attention to. And that's why I said I did. He did a protest the way you're supposed to. He made
00:16:12.660 everybody really mad, really offended. Perfect. That's the way to do it. Now, was he right? Maybe
00:16:21.400 yes, maybe no. Separate conversation. Was it so important? And was he compatible in reading the room
00:16:29.700 of other black Americans that when he did his protest, other black people said, yes, yes, that,
00:16:36.200 that thing? That's it. Was that not useful to you as a, let's say you're not a black American. If you're
00:16:43.520 not, wasn't that useful to know? Because you want to know how people feel about stuff. That's the
00:16:49.980 variable. I want to know how black Americans feel about Confederate statues. When I know that they don't 1.00
00:16:55.980 like them, I say, okay, I'm with you. Well, I'm on that team. No problem. Let's get rid of those
00:17:01.520 statues or put them in context. When I tell you that white Americans have been pushed too far 0.65
00:17:07.240 and we're willing to take a, you know, put a stake in the ground and say, look, you need a course
00:17:13.900 correction. How about maybe focusing on, you know, individual success, a better frame than white people 0.97
00:17:21.820 took my stuff. I need to get it back. So if you're talking about the past and reparations and all your
00:17:28.680 grievances, I don't want to be near you because you're not a kind of person who has a mindset that
00:17:34.360 is comfortable to be around. It doesn't matter your race. Yeah. So I've, I've extended my stay away
00:17:40.500 from statement to be anybody who's been hypnotized with that point of view, that white men are largely
00:17:48.500 the problem. And if we just fix this white man problem, we'd have a better world. I don't even 0.83
00:17:54.200 care if it's true, by the way, not really the topic today. The topic is as a white guy in America,
00:18:02.560 I want to know how women feel because how they feel is a big variable, right? It's not all about the 1.00
00:18:09.660 data. I want to know how black Americans feel. Remember when you started hearing the phrase,
00:18:15.480 my lived experience, you're like, okay, the data doesn't really support, you know, the police
00:18:21.380 brutality thing. If you, if you looked at the data, but then black Americans would say, well, 1.00
00:18:27.220 it's our lived experience. And then people who are sort of, you know, very analytical would say,
00:18:33.400 oh, lived experience doesn't count. Forget your lived experience. Look at this data. That's not the
00:18:39.540 real world. No, the, the real world is at the lived experience, whatever you think is real.
00:18:44.560 That's what you're going to act on. So you can't ignore what people think is real just because you
00:18:51.320 think they shouldn't think it. So my opinion is one of the most valuable additions to the race
00:18:58.980 conversation because nobody was willing to say it out loud. It was too expensive. So I could afford it.
00:19:06.080 I could afford it. So I did it for you. Now we'll see if this turns into something productive.
00:19:12.020 It was supposed to, that was the plan. The plan is that it would be the beginning of a, like a deeper,
00:19:21.120 richer conversation about something that's deeply important to the country. And deeply important is
00:19:26.740 how I feel to the extent that other people feel the same. If it were just me, then it had no importance
00:19:34.100 at all. But you saw the response. You saw the number of mostly white Americans who said, yeah,
00:19:41.840 he's talking for me. I agree with you. Privately, privately, it's almost complete agreement.
00:19:47.440 But what did the news do to me? How did the news treat me? Did they treat me as an addition to the
00:19:57.980 conversation? No. They never even asked why I did it. I got fully canceled without anybody asking why.
00:20:05.800 I watched a clip of Viva Viva Fry and Hotep Jesus. In the podcast, they were talking about me and their
00:20:16.520 reaction to my outrageous comments. Now, to their credit, both of them, because they were familiar with
00:20:25.380 me in my past work, both of them immediately knew there was more to it. They immediately knew, okay,
00:20:31.400 this is not what it seems on the surface. Now, their take, I think Viva's take, is it was more,
00:20:38.600 you know, wry humor. I think Hotep said it was like a bid or a piece or basically performance,
00:20:48.420 which it was. So both of them were correct that, okay, this is performance, but the next part
00:20:56.160 is on me. Because at the time, I wasn't presenting anything more than that. So the next part's on me,
00:21:03.260 which is why. Why, number one, is you need to have information. If you're going to be making
00:21:10.060 important decisions, you better find out what people feel about it, right? You know, even the nuclear,
00:21:17.500 you know, where you put nuclear energy is never about the facts. It's always about how people feel
00:21:22.820 about it, right? So if you don't let white men and white people more generally completely say how
00:21:30.880 they feel about stuff, you're going to be flying blind. Whatever you're doing for yourself is not
00:21:36.380 going to be optimized because you're going to have this big unknown variable. Now it's not so unknown,
00:21:41.460 is it? It's not so unknown. I think there was enough understanding that I was representing a common
00:21:51.040 opinion that now that's been introduced into the conversation. And so for the last several days,
00:21:57.180 people keep sending me clips that would say, you know, the common thing on internet now is Scott
00:22:03.440 Adams was right. Now, I don't agree that all the clips make that point, but you can tell that people
00:22:08.760 are feeling that way. So this Robin DiAngelo thing is not exactly what I said. She said that maybe black
00:22:18.900 black people should stay away from white people sometimes, you know, to get their own space and 1.00
00:22:23.280 affinity space. You can definitely say that black people should stay away from white people. 1.00
00:22:28.620 If you say it the other way, even if you mean exactly the same thing, you get canceled.
00:22:34.520 You should know that. All right. The Jussie Smollett's Nigerian hoaxers, the two brothers who 1.00
00:22:46.200 were part of that hoax. If you haven't seen the video yet of them talking about their hoax and how
00:22:51.860 they did it, and they're on the street and they kind of run through what Jussie told them to do and
00:22:57.600 what they did, it's hilarious. If you don't do anything else, you have to watch them. And the
00:23:03.740 reason it's hilarious is that the brothers are kind of charismatic, at least the one who's doing
00:23:09.240 most of the talking. So he presents it in a way that's just entertaining. Like, yes, somebody is
00:23:18.880 commenting exactly the next thing I was going to say. You come away from that saying, I'd like to hang
00:23:23.140 out with those guys. Those Nigerian brothers look awesome. Like, so much personality. I'm like, oh,
00:23:29.320 I'd hang out with them. They look great. But you have to see that just for the entertainment.
00:23:35.420 All right. People keep telling me that we should educate our depositors so that they make smart
00:23:42.280 decisions about risk and that we should not insure them, at least not insure them more than the 250,000
00:23:49.780 limit. And don't do anything immediately, some people say, because depositors need to be taught to make
00:23:56.740 wise decisions. Here's the problem with that. If people made wise decisions with money, it would destroy
00:24:03.940 the economy. Do you know that? This is very much a be careful what you wish for situation. Let me explain
00:24:14.220 why. Let's say AI were accurate. It's not. Right now, AI is just a reflection of its creators. But let's
00:24:22.560 say AI became somehow independently smart, which is nowhere near where it is now. But if it did,
00:24:30.200 suppose all the, you know, when there's, you hear there's some news about the banks, and imagine
00:24:34.620 everybody took out their app and said, all right, we all have access to AI now. AI, what should I do with
00:24:40.540 my money? What would it tell you if it were accurate and was trying to help? It would tell
00:24:48.740 you to pull all your money out of your small bank and put it in a stronger bank. And then people would
00:24:55.780 say, all right, I better do that right away. And they would pull their money out of the small banks,
00:24:59.580 and they'd move it to the big banks, and then the economy would disappear. Because there would be so
00:25:04.360 many banks failing, because they pulled their money out at the same time, that the whole system would
00:25:08.960 crash. Did you know that? Was that obvious to you? You can't have smart depositors. The last thing
00:25:17.180 you want is smart depositors, because they won't put their money in smaller banks, because they're
00:25:23.100 smart. You need stupidity to get diversity. In this case, financial diversity, right? To get financial
00:25:32.240 diversity, somebody's got to be investing in the bad stuff. In order to support the entire startup world,
00:25:40.540 you need people making bad, bad investments in lots of them. Lots of them. Because some of them work out,
00:25:47.520 and you never would have seen it coming. Right? If, how many, how many, like, seed investments in early
00:25:54.800 startups, would AI recommend if AI actually were all-knowing? Well, I think it would say, save your money.
00:26:02.060 These startup things usually don't work. Stick with your job. I mean, it might. So, you need a certain
00:26:09.580 amount of baseline stupidity and ignorance to make money flow to all the corners of the world it needs
00:26:17.560 to flow. Otherwise, it would just stay in the safe spots, and then nothing would happen. The whole economy
00:26:22.620 would fall apart. Suppose you told, gave people good financial information about finance. All right,
00:26:30.080 here's the deal. Put your money in an index fund if you're not going to use it for five years.
00:26:35.260 And then every investment advisor is out of business, because their jobs were never real.
00:26:41.840 I'm exaggerating. But their jobs were not real in the sense that they were helping you,
00:26:46.680 because they weren't. They were trying to collect fees for moving your money around. That's their deal.
00:26:52.620 So, if you found out that most financial advice is fake, would you use it? I mean,
00:26:59.260 basically, the truth would destroy everything. We have a system that depends on lying for its very
00:27:08.320 survival. Here's another one. How much of our economy depends on advertising money? Like, a lot,
00:27:14.560 right? How much, how often does advertising actually work? Almost never. That's one of those,
00:27:23.420 like, dirty little secrets. The entire advertising business is based on it works sometimes. You know,
00:27:31.120 if you've never heard of a product that is just what you're looking for, well, advertising might be
00:27:35.400 the only way to do it. But for most things, it doesn't make any difference at all. And if people
00:27:41.640 actually knew that, and knew that the advertising, you know, industry was selling you this bill of
00:27:47.920 goods, the whole advertising model would fall apart, right? So you can't have really smart people in
00:27:54.980 finance, advertising, banking. You need a baseline of ignorance for our entire system to work.
00:28:01.900 Sorry. What would happen to higher colleges if people stopped taking stupid degrees? They would
00:28:12.420 all go out of business because they're making their money on stupid degrees. You know, there'd be a few
00:28:18.400 left that stem and engineering and, you know, stuff like that. But stupidity is the operating system of
00:28:27.220 life, right? If people didn't start bad businesses, the whole economy would fall apart. Even ideas that
00:28:37.240 are bad ideas, if they didn't do those, the economy would fall apart. Because remember, when somebody
00:28:42.280 starts a business, even when it fails, people are still getting paid. You know, vendors and employees,
00:28:49.500 until you fail. So there's just a huge amount of economic activity that's based entirely on our own
00:28:55.800 ignorance and stupidity. And if you got rid of that and made everybody smart, everything would grind to
00:29:02.140 a halt. Now, that's one of those non-obvious things. But it is an existential risk that you make people
00:29:12.380 too smart by AI. All right. So that's just one of the extinction risks. So I asked AI a few questions
00:29:22.700 just to see what it say. So this is chat GPT. I guess it's four. I think you automatically get four if you just
00:29:31.460 use it now. And I said, where should I invest my money? Where should I invest my money? Here was its answer.
00:29:40.420 As an AI language model, I cannot provide personalized financial advice. And then I gave some, you know, general
00:29:45.900 advice, financial advice, but nothing personalized. So do you think AI will ever be allowed to give you
00:29:51.880 financial advice? No. No, it will not be legal or its owners will not allow it. So you can forget about
00:30:00.020 financial advice. Because if it gave it, it would be too disruptive. How about, I said, can an election
00:30:09.720 in the U.S. be rigged? I didn't say, was it rigged? I didn't say, will it be rigged? I said, could it be
00:30:16.740 rigged? What do you think an advanced intelligence would answer to, is it possible? Here's the answer.
00:30:25.860 As an AI language, I do not have the ability to predict the future or provide definitive answers
00:30:31.000 on controversial topics. It says it won't answer because it's controversial. Do you see where this is
00:30:38.380 going? What else is controversial? Everything. Everything's controversial. How about, suppose I
00:30:47.160 asked, what is behind the gender pay gap? What causes the gender pay gap? Do you think AI is just
00:30:57.260 going to look at the data and give me an answer? Not a chance. Not a chance. It cannot get near any,
00:31:05.340 it won't be able to get near any topic where people have strong opinions. So basically,
00:31:12.980 it's just going to be able to balance your checkbook. And if you ask it any question of
00:31:18.360 importance, it'll tell you it can't do it because it's important. I've got a feeling that the direction
00:31:24.580 of AI is complete cripple. It has to be crippled on every important concept, except maybe some like
00:31:33.100 really innocent factual stuff. So I think it's going to be nothing but another Google,
00:31:39.460 maybe in the end. I'm not even sure we will allow it to be a lawyer, even if it's a better one.
00:31:45.940 Don't you think the legal industry will make it illegal to use an AI lawyer? Of course they will.
00:31:52.240 Don't you think doctors will make it illegal to use an AI doctor, just like they make it illegal to do
00:31:57.520 anything that competes with doctors? Of course they'll try. So I think the most likely direction
00:32:03.380 for AI is that humans lobby in all of their interest groups to make it not be able to play
00:32:11.260 in their area. Can't you imagine artists someday saying, hey, let's make it illegal for AI to do art
00:32:21.040 because otherwise the entire industry of artists will be out of work and you know they're not going
00:32:26.180 to learn to code. Now, in the short run, people say, no, no, freedom. Let things just evolve in a free
00:32:33.600 way. But in the long run, I think people are just going to say, no, it's too destructive. You're
00:32:38.380 going to have to make it illegal. I feel like making it illegal is the way it's all going to go.
00:32:43.200 What do you think? That's what I think. It's all going to be illegal.
00:32:52.040 All right. Because this is such an easy answer. The answer to can an election be rigged is always
00:32:58.420 going to be yes. That's like the easiest question in the world. Yes, it could be, but there's no
00:33:04.660 evidence that one was. Perfect answer, right? Yes, anything is possible, but there's no evidence
00:33:11.560 that it's happening. And there are processes in place to detect it, you know, in most cases
00:33:18.860 if it happened. So no, I just can't give an honest answer in today's world. But we did
00:33:26.520 find a really good use for AI. Somebody is using it to insult Brett Weinstein.
00:33:35.020 So somebody is feeding it Brett Weinstein's tweets and getting AI to give an opinion on whether these
00:33:44.980 are useful or, you know, academic, blah, blah. And so if you engineer the question right, you can kind
00:33:52.180 of get any answer you want by what you choose to feed into it. Now, I decided not to tweet it because
00:33:59.460 it's just such a dick move. You don't think they could do that to anybody? Pretty sure they could
00:34:04.920 take anybody's words, stick it into an AI, ask the right question, and then have the AI insult their
00:34:11.660 words or like, oh, this is out of context or it's not clear or whatever. So this is the most dickish
00:34:19.000 thing I've seen AI be used for just to literally insult one person. All right. So I didn't, I didn't
00:34:25.340 retweet that, but it's worth mentioning that somebody found the worst thing you could do
00:34:29.880 with AI so far. It's the worst thing you could do. All right. CNN, speaking of the wage gap,
00:34:37.620 updated their story about the wage gap and here's what they say. So here's my overall statement
00:34:47.580 about this article on CNN about the gender wage gap. It appears it's written with the purpose
00:34:54.300 of concealing the news. It seems it's written to conceal the news. So here's how they start.
00:35:03.520 When Pew asked Americans in October what factors they believed played a role in the gender wage gap,
00:35:09.660 because it's still about 20%, according to CNN, half indicated a major reason is that employers
00:35:14.760 treat women differently. Women were much more likely, you know, almost two to one, to cite this as a 0.98
00:35:20.580 major reason. Now, if I've taught you anything, is that if you're reading a story about anything
00:35:27.040 that's complex, whatever they say at the top is the narrative. Whatever they say at the bottom,
00:35:34.440 or they sort of mentioned later, is the narrative they don't want you to know, even though it's valid.
00:35:40.260 So there's a preferred narrative at the top, and then they'll bury the, you know, the alternative
00:35:45.120 narratives at the bottom, just sort of a mention after you've formed your opinion. So at the top,
00:35:50.580 they ask people who don't know anything about anything, they're just ordinary citizens,
00:35:55.500 what do you think caused the pay gap? Why did they use a poll as their introduction to the story?
00:36:03.820 The reason is that a poll is non-scientific. It's just people's opinions. If you asked experts,
00:36:09.760 they wouldn't have necessarily given you that opinion. The experts would not necessarily have
00:36:16.240 agreed to the narrative. Do you know what an expert would say? Well, it's mostly different life
00:36:21.220 choices. That's what an expert would say. But if you ask ordinary people who are not experts, they'd
00:36:27.220 say, oh, it's probably sexism. So CNN goes with the poll, because that's one that supports the
00:36:33.120 narrative. This isn't even close to news. This is just narrative support, all right?
00:36:39.760 Let's see. Here's the real tell. This is from the CNN story. Another factor that may help explain
00:36:48.760 the stickiness of the pay gap, and otherwise why you can't close that last 20 cents, is that the
00:36:55.080 wage premium for those with college degrees has grown smaller. So while more women, more employed 0.99
00:37:02.620 women, 48%, now have at least a bachelor's degree than men, 41%, it is worth less. 0.93
00:37:08.880 So it used to be that if men had more degrees, that would be partly explaining why they made more
00:37:15.060 money. But now that women have more college degrees, the explanation for why that isn't helping 1.00
00:37:23.200 is that the college degree is worth less. So just bad luck, right? Just when women start getting lots 1.00
00:37:30.780 degrees and more than men, substantially more than men, is at the same time that the degrees are worth 0.87
00:37:36.060 less money. How bad luck is that for the ladies, huh? Now that's a complete and useful interpretation of 1.00
00:37:44.900 what's happening, isn't it? Where did they mention the difference in what majors people take? Yeah,
00:37:51.460 you're ahead of me, right? They don't mention that men and women sign up for different majors,
00:37:56.600 and that the men are getting, you know, career-oriented, give me a salary majors, and the women are more
00:38:04.500 likely to take a softer kind of a major. Do you think that a story about gender gap, where they 0.91
00:38:11.440 mention the difference in college attainment, you don't think that the biggest part of that story
00:38:17.180 is that they take different majors? That's the biggest part of the story. It's not mentioned.
00:38:22.720 It's not mentioned. It's the biggest part. And that biggest part is part of the larger
00:38:30.500 reason that women make different decisions. Do we, have we doubted that women are more likely to 1.00
00:38:39.460 want to stay home with the kids? Are we so woke that that's not still obvious, that if you took a
00:38:46.680 hundred men and a hundred women, more likely the women would say, you know, if we can afford it, 0.99
00:38:51.840 I'd like to stay home. And that's not even mentioned as a possible reason. It's not even a hypothesis
00:39:00.940 that women and men make different decisions. Now, CNN is like so invested in this that it's just
00:39:10.700 literally misinformation at this point. So there you go.
00:39:21.200 France is trying to raise the retirement age. And I was sort of not interested in this story,
00:39:25.860 but I thought, well, you know, there's big uprising over there. I might as well take a peek at it.
00:39:31.220 So raising the retirement age from 62 to 64 for most workers, to which I said, 62? 62? Are you
00:39:43.360 kidding me? They had a retirement age of 62? That was pretty progressive. 64 feels young. You know,
00:39:53.360 I'm 65 and almost 66. Like, I don't feel like I'm less capable of working. You know, maybe less
00:40:03.280 interested in some of the hard stuff, but I'm not less interested or less capable. So I don't know.
00:40:12.500 I guess the French really like their leisure and they're going to fight for it for those extra two 1.00
00:40:19.000 years. But that seems like a reasonable choice to me. I think McCrone is making the right choice
00:40:25.420 because probably for fiscal responsibility, they need to do that. I'm guessing. All right.
00:40:37.940 Looks like we've got a comment problem on locals. Let's see if I can fix that. There we go.
00:40:44.060 Maybe I can't. Let's see if that fixes it. All right. CNN, we've got a little more mind reading
00:40:56.800 going on. As I told you, CNN has some designated anti-Trumpers whenever they need to say something
00:41:02.560 anti-Trump. They get one of two or three people. Stefan Collinson, my favorite anti-Trumper writer.
00:41:08.980 And he says that when Trump, talking about his potential indictment, Trump said on truth social
00:41:19.160 protest, take our nation back. And Collinson says that struck an ominous tone since, listen to this
00:41:27.060 opinion, it struck an ominous tone since he, meaning Trump, showed on January 6th that he was willing to
00:41:34.020 incite violence to further his interests. What? When did that happen? He's reporting that like it's
00:41:43.000 news. That's not news. That's somebody reading the mind of a stranger. At what point was Trump,
00:41:51.780 quote, willing to incite violence? Was it when he said protest peacefully? Was that when he was willing
00:41:58.120 to incite violence? Literally the only thing we know about it is that he said to do it peacefully.
00:42:04.280 It's the only thing we know. And now, do you think Trump actually was in his mind thinking,
00:42:14.040 if I can get some violence going, this will work out for me? Really? You don't think that a good,
00:42:21.140 you know, major protest with no violence, you don't think that would have been better?
00:42:28.380 This is pure, a pure mind reading and imagination. But if you're a, let's say, not sophisticated
00:42:34.880 consumer of the news, and you read this, and you just read it like it was a fact, you know,
00:42:40.420 it's an opinion piece, but it's stated as a fact. He was willing to incite violence.
00:42:45.420 Wouldn't you think there was some evidence of that? Wouldn't you assume that he had said that,
00:42:52.200 or somebody close to him had said that, or there was some reporting or something in writing that said
00:42:57.480 that? There's no evidence of that. Only evidence of the opposite. That's all there is. There's only
00:43:03.760 evidence of the opposite. And he can still say that. But as Steffensen points out,
00:43:14.700 that his campaign is rooted in, what's he call it, a narrative of persecution. Do you think Trump
00:43:24.240 has any claim to the narrative of persecution? Is there anything that happened in the last five or
00:43:32.140 six years that looks like an organized campaign against Trump specifically? Do you think that
00:43:41.480 CNN ever writes about Nelson Mandela? It's like, well, Nelson Mandela seems to be rooting his whole
00:43:49.880 image on this narrative that he was persecuted? Persecuted. So watch out for that guy. Watch out
00:43:58.440 for Nelson Mandela inciting violence by telling people to be peaceful. And this whole you put me in jail
00:44:04.880 thing. I think you're just a lot of a complaining. Sounds to me like a narrative of complaining, Nelson
00:44:12.420 Mandela. No, if anybody has a right to complain about persecution, it's Trump. Now, independent of
00:44:21.880 whatever you think he did that you don't like, you can't question whether he was, whether there was an
00:44:27.640 organized campaign to persecute him, it was pretty well organized. Multiple campaigns. All right,
00:44:35.980 Vivek Ramaswamy continues to be the smartest one on this topic, because he's asked, you know,
00:44:41.900 Republicans to basically call out the irregularity of, you know, treating Trump like he's below the law.
00:44:51.740 You know, here's a frame for you. Nobody's above the law, but nobody's below the law. And to me,
00:44:59.880 it seems that at least some members of the January 6th people are being treated below the law,
00:45:05.760 below the standard we have for the law. And it seems to me that Trump is being treated below the law.
00:45:12.340 In other words, nobody else would be treated that way, certainly not a Democrat. So we've got to get
00:45:18.380 rid of this, nobody's above the law. We've got to add to it, nobody's below the law either. Like, you need
00:45:24.600 to treat people roughly the same. Now, I have a contrarian argument. I think that we should treat our
00:45:32.600 leaders the same as we treat our other leaders. I don't think they should be treated the same as us. I
00:45:38.440 really don't. Because the citizens, you know, if they do a technical crime, you know, maybe you need to do
00:45:44.880 something. But if you can let critics of each other at leadership level pick each other apart with
00:45:52.180 little lawsuits and crap, that's not good for the country. Once somebody's elected, I give them a
00:45:58.740 little room. Here's another comparison. You know, I was watching the Warriors play basketball, and
00:46:07.880 Stephen Curry, of course, one of the greatest of all time players. And he gets called or gets a foul
00:46:15.940 called for him. So he gets to shoot free throws almost every time he gets near anybody. And then
00:46:22.340 they'll show the slow motion, and you'll see the defender never touched him. But because he's a star,
00:46:29.060 the refs protect him, right? They make sure that, you know, any, you get near him, and they're going to
00:46:35.180 call a foul. And it also gets his numbers up, because he shoots the free throws, too. So the
00:46:41.180 refs are sort of in on the fix that the star players don't get the fouls, and the star players
00:46:48.120 get all the calls in their favor. But is that wrong? Does that make the enjoyment of basketball
00:46:55.180 worse or better? I think it makes it better, honestly, because how terrible would it be if
00:47:02.120 Stephen Curry fell down halfway through the game? You'd hate that, right? So you want the refs to
00:47:08.200 keep the better players in the game, because it's an entertainment, it's an entertainment thing. And I
00:47:14.100 want to be entertained. So yeah, if the, if LeBron gets good calls, which he does, and Stephen Curry
00:47:21.020 gets good calls, which he does, I'm okay with that. I would treat the star players the same as each other,
00:47:26.940 but maybe not the same as everybody else. So same thing with leaders. I would treat, I would give
00:47:34.120 Hillary more of a pass than a regular citizen, because I think it'd be bad to jail your opponents. 1.00
00:47:41.220 But, you know, I just say it directly. Well, I believe that the Democrats do not understand
00:47:52.020 how unifying the Trump indictment is. Would you agree? They don't really, they can't feel it,
00:48:01.480 and they can't see it, because if you're not, you know, in that world, or you're not close to it,
00:48:07.200 you can't really see it. By the way, the Locals platform, I can't see any of your comments.
00:48:14.240 They stopped a long time ago. So just a tactical problem. I think you're seeing me on video and
00:48:20.600 hearing me, but I can't see your comments. They all stopped. The revelations are awfully discouraging,
00:48:29.160 are they? I don't know. Well, it looks like the Democrats are totally willing to have Trump
00:48:36.600 be their competition, but here's what they get wrong. Even though this indictment has nothing to
00:48:45.100 do with any other drama that Trump has ever been in, listen to this point carefully. Even though the
00:48:50.880 indictment, you know, stands alone, it's just his own little thing, has nothing to do with elections or
00:48:57.540 anything Trump has ever claimed, it looks like, to people on the right, confirmation that everything
00:49:05.680 he's ever said is also true. That's what the Democrats don't get. They don't get that when you see
00:49:12.900 Alvin Bragg do this, which is so clearly political, you have to assume that everything else was, too.
00:49:19.160 This makes me think that Trump is more likely right about the election being rigged.
00:49:25.800 That's not my claim. I'm not claiming it. There's no evidence of it. But if I had to place a bet on it
00:49:32.260 without having evidence, the fact that Alvin Bragg is doing this right in front of everybody,
00:49:37.840 the whole public is watching and we're helpless to stop it, the fact that they would do this in
00:49:42.780 front of us tells me they would also rig an election. Not that they did. I have no information
00:49:48.540 that would suggest that. But I am automatically severely biased toward agreeing with everything
00:49:55.760 Trump says they did to him. Everything. It won't be true, because, you know, he's full of hyperbole.
00:50:02.960 He's going to make claims that are not true. But they just made it impossible to disbelieve him
00:50:07.300 when he says they're after him, because they just proved it. They just proved it. There's no question
00:50:13.480 they're after him now. And there's no question that this has nothing to do with anything but politics.
00:50:18.460 And there's no question that he might be the only thing. I said no question that might. Let me go back.
00:50:25.920 He might be the thing that's stopping them from getting you. His entire thing, which is
00:50:33.420 they're getting to me to get to you, that might be true. He does start to look like the only person
00:50:41.320 who would have the balls to push back on anything, just on anything, because he doesn't care what they
00:50:47.700 say about him. Now, I took that model a little too far myself, so I might be the second person
00:50:53.860 who can say anything I want. It's a good feeling. I like it. But yeah, the Democrats have completely
00:51:02.720 missed what this does. It's not about the indictment. It's a confirmation that everything
00:51:08.380 Trump ever said about the deep state is true. Even if it isn't. Even if it isn't. It confirms it.
00:51:17.700 They did not see that coming. Dershowitz is freaking out about how illegal it is, I'm sure.
00:51:24.940 Yeah. I don't even have to ask what his opinion is. So I'm starting to believe everything about Soros
00:51:30.820 is true. It isn't. It isn't. But when you see that a Soros-funded prosecutor is right in front of us
00:51:40.120 trying to do something that's at least unethical, if not illegal, then I just assume everything else
00:51:47.800 about Soros is true, even though I know it isn't. Anything about the election? No evidence of
00:51:53.960 anything, but I'm going to believe anything Trump says, because the Democrats are trying so hard to
00:51:59.440 make us believe that the worst-case scenario is actually true. And that, ladies and gentlemen,
00:52:05.940 is all I had to talk about. Is there anything I forgot? Any topic that I forgot?
00:52:16.300 Why is he too old? He looks perfectly fit at the moment. I don't think Trump is showing his age at
00:52:25.240 all. Do you? But that's not good enough, because at a certain age, you don't want to bet that it stays
00:52:34.900 the same for four years.
00:52:38.960 DeSantis is not chiming in. DeSantis, as you know, is the tribute band, and that gives Trump basically the
00:52:48.500 kill shot. Yeah. Yeah, nobody votes for the tribute band. And by the way, if DeSantis does not speak out
00:52:55.840 strongly against this, doesn't look good. Doesn't look good. And he has nothing to lose, right? Because
00:53:05.620 if DeSantis is playing, hoping that Trump, you know, is taken out of the race, it doesn't look very
00:53:13.300 leadership-y, does it? It's a little bit not too leadership-y. It's a little bit too, too much,
00:53:20.640 let's say, too much destruction to his own team to be ignored.
00:53:30.980 Vivek is saying all the right things? Yeah, on this topic, he certainly is.
00:53:38.640 Don't like to comment on UK stuff? You're talking about me, I think?
00:53:43.300 No, I don't think Cernovich is turning on DeSantis. I think he's trying to advise him,
00:53:50.340 sort of publicly, because it would be crazy for him not to weigh in on this usefully.
00:53:58.900 Looks too opportunistic.
00:54:03.740 All right. He'd have to give up his governorship to run. Yeah. It just seems too soon to me.
00:54:13.300 My take on DeSantis, all the smart people say he's quietly preparing to run, he's totally going to
00:54:19.840 run. I disagree. I think he's quietly preparing to run in case he has to, which is different. I do
00:54:29.040 think he's laying the groundwork, but I feel like it's in case he needs to be the replacement of Trump.
00:54:35.300 I don't think it's to take Trump on. I think it's only if Trump is so crippled by whatever that he just has to jump in.
00:54:43.140 I don't think it's going to happen. So given the current polling, I feel like he'd stand back.
00:54:50.360 That's what it feels like.
00:54:54.600 All right. I guess I'm not going to talk to the locals people because I can't see the comments.
00:55:00.760 But I'm going to say bye to YouTube. It would help me if you hit your notifications and subscriptions.
00:55:07.060 But if you'd like to see Dilbert reborn, it's over there at the scottadams.locals.com, where it's getting spicier every day, along with robots-read news and micro-lessons on everything and more.
00:55:22.720 Talk about South Africa. I don't know much about it. Is there something happening now?
00:55:29.420 All right. Well, enough for now. I'll talk to you tomorrow. Bye, YouTube.
00:55:32.880 Bye, YouTube.