Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2056 Scott Adams： Bad Week For DeSantis, Alvin Bragg, TikTok, AI. Great Week For Trump

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Coffee with Scott Adams.

00:00:06.580 It's the finest thing that's ever happened to you in your whole darn life.

00:00:10.260 Probably. Probably.

00:00:12.060 You know, things might pick up later, but at the moment,

00:00:15.540 this is the best thing that's ever happened to you, and it's getting better.

00:00:18.960 Watch this.

00:00:20.220 All you need is a simultaneous sip to take it up a level.

00:00:22.940 All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass of tank or gel,

00:00:25.940 a sistein, a kinteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:28.880 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:31.580 I like coffee.

00:00:32.940 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day.

00:00:36.360 The thing makes everything better.

00:00:37.800 It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.

00:00:40.420 Go.

00:00:44.260 Ah.

00:00:46.000 The best thing that ever happened.

00:00:48.360 Well, there's going to be a theme for today's live stream.

00:00:52.300 The theme is, it seems like everything's going my way.

00:00:57.420 That's the theme.

00:00:58.820 Let's see if I can connect it all together and make that theme work, okay?

00:01:03.040 I'll start with a tweet I just saw before I went live from David Boxenhorn.

00:01:08.300 A good follow on Twitter.

00:01:10.480 David Boxenhorn has good stuff.

00:01:13.840 And he tweets,

00:01:14.720 It's been in the news lately that the age gap between men and women in relationships is increasing.

00:01:21.320 I've seen a lot of speculation about why this is, but not the one that comes to my mind.

00:01:27.200 Women want children at an earlier age than men do. 1.00

00:01:30.400 So get serious at an earlier age.

00:01:32.440 Do you think that's why older men and younger women are getting together?

00:01:40.080 Do you think that's the reason?

00:01:43.260 I don't think so.

00:01:44.260 Now, this happens to be one of the few categories I can speak about with some authority.

00:01:50.920 There are a lot of things I talk about that's maybe not my sweet spot.

00:01:55.600 Maybe I'm just sort of speculating about other people.

00:01:57.960 But now and then, there's a topic that I can talk to with great authority.

00:02:05.100 It's not about having kids.

00:02:07.660 It's definitely not that.

00:02:11.080 It's money, of course.

00:02:13.800 You know, financial security would be right up there.

00:02:17.440 But almost equal to it is a mindset difference.

00:02:22.860 There's just a clear mindset difference.

00:02:25.080 And it's not everybody's thing, right?

00:02:27.120 But let me put it this way.

00:02:29.340 As a general statement that does not apply to every person,

00:02:34.000 but as sort of a general statement,

00:02:36.760 I think women look for people who are like their dad, 1.00

00:02:42.680 and men look for people who maybe remind them of their mom in some ways.

00:02:47.700 Not necessarily looks, but in terms of personality and stuff.

00:02:51.000 Now, the problem is that younger men remind women of their mother. 0.96

00:02:59.280 Am I right?

00:03:00.680 If you're a younger woman, you say,

00:03:02.440 Oh, I just met this guy my age.

00:03:04.460 He reminds me of my mother.

00:03:07.600 He's very woke.

00:03:10.140 He's very empathetic.

00:03:11.480 Very caring.

00:03:12.560 Seems to care about other people a great deal.

00:03:14.520 Uses all the right pronouns.

00:03:15.660 Yeah.

00:03:16.660 Yeah.

00:03:17.520 So if somebody reminds you of your mother and your female,

00:03:21.940 that might not be the most attractive thing.

00:03:24.460 But there would be a lot of young women 1.00

00:03:26.940 who think that the men their age just are not exactly manly enough, basically.

00:03:34.420 And so they're looking for older guys who are still a little less woke.

00:03:40.200 So one way I could put it is there's a split preference.

00:03:45.680 Plenty of young women like extra wokeness with their men before they cheat on them. 1.00

00:03:51.800 I mean, it's a temporary thing.

00:03:53.780 Obviously, the woke men will all be cheated on.

00:03:56.580 I think that's obvious to everybody.

00:03:58.600 But maybe some portion of women just prefer guys that remind them of their dad.

00:04:04.420 You know, sort of a self-determination mindset, you know, less complaining, that sort of thing.

00:04:11.780 So I think that's what it is.

00:04:12.940 It's a mindset thing.

00:04:14.620 All right.

00:04:15.120 In the news, coffee has been tested and apparently is not as risky for your cardiac health as once thought.

00:04:24.680 So once again, things are going my way.

00:04:29.020 That's right.

00:04:29.480 Coffee is associated with a longer life and taking more steps when you're alive and getting more done and being more focused and all that.

00:04:43.520 So coffee, not so bad for you after all, at least for your heart, very specifically.

00:04:49.120 My conversation with Larry Elder, he graciously interviewed me for his Epoch Times site, but you can see it.

00:05:00.380 You can look, either Google it.

00:05:02.140 I think it's now on YouTube.

00:05:03.900 So just Google Larry Elder and Scott Adams and it'll pop right up.

00:05:08.620 Or you can see the link in my Twitter feed today toward the top.

00:05:12.280 So that's going my way.

00:05:16.460 So coffee's going my way.

00:05:19.440 Younger women are like older guys. 1.00

00:05:21.660 That's going my way.

00:05:23.640 You know, Larry Elder interview worked out nicely, I thought.

00:05:28.460 All going my way.

00:05:30.460 Here's something that doesn't have anything directly to do with me, but I'm going to weigh in.

00:05:37.480 Apparently there's a national Adderall shortage.

00:05:40.720 Did you know that?

00:05:42.280 There's an Adderall shortage.

00:05:44.020 And apparently it's a intentional shortage.

00:05:47.140 So I guess the government has put some kind of a cap on how much can be made.

00:05:52.820 Presumably because of abuse.

00:05:55.240 Now, I've watched the arguments online and they're very predictable.

00:06:00.620 It's the everyone, no, the fewer they are, the complete. 0.57

00:06:05.080 So this argument is in the form of, let's pretend that if there's a large group of people, that whenever we talk about them, that the few people in that group are considered the same as all of them.

00:06:18.440 And it's the reverse on the opposite side.

00:06:21.560 So here's what you see.

00:06:23.380 You see the people who genuinely need Adderall, because there is a type of person, a type of brain, where it's all positive.

00:06:31.780 It's all positive.

00:06:32.840 They really, really need it.

00:06:35.800 So they say, hey, this is a valuable thing I need and it's being prevented and it's all bad.

00:06:41.460 It is all bad.

00:06:42.700 If you're on Adderall and you need it, and then you have to go without it, that's no joke.

00:06:48.960 I don't think people understand what that's, the implications of that.

00:06:53.820 That can turn a person into a completely dysfunctional person.

00:06:58.240 And there may be some health risks of not tapering off as well.

00:07:03.440 I don't know about that, but I think the withdrawal is kind of nasty.

00:07:07.680 So you've got one group who's saying this is a national emergency and is created by the government.

00:07:13.700 And people like me are going to be really, really in trouble.

00:07:18.960 This is no joke.

00:07:20.720 There's a group of human beings in this country who are government, for reasons that may have been well-intentioned, but of course everything goes wrong.

00:07:29.940 They are absolutely screwed.

00:07:33.580 And I feel like there's zero empathy, because a lot of people are in the other camp that says,

00:07:40.640 oh, this is just because you found a legal way to get a meth.

00:07:45.240 That's what the critics say.

00:07:46.840 Oh, it's, you know, uh-huh, you won't be able to concentrate extra good, so big deal, you'll just be like me after that.

00:07:56.360 All right, now here's the problem.

00:07:58.740 Both sides are right, completely right, for some percentage of the population.

00:08:05.180 But both of them are completely wrong about what's going on with the other half.

00:08:10.740 I don't know if it's half, but something like that.

00:08:13.740 And once again, it's another example of complete inability to have a useful conversation.

00:08:20.760 The honest conversation is that a lack of Adderall will absolutely screw maybe tens of millions of people.

00:08:29.360 I mean, it's a lot, at least millions.

00:08:32.220 I say millions at a minimum.

00:08:34.440 And at the same time, it's 100% true that the drug is really overused and over-prescribed,

00:08:42.120 and that people who don't need it, need it, are certainly getting it.

00:08:46.000 So is nobody able to say both things can be true, that we have a national emergency for a group of Americans

00:08:55.120 who it looks like the other group of Americans just don't give a shit about, don't give a shit about them?

00:09:02.600 Absolutely wrong.

00:09:04.180 I'm going to take the same view on this that I take with, I know this will seem weird, Confederate statues.

00:09:10.940 That my opinion of Confederate statues isn't really part of the issue.

00:09:17.900 The issue is some large percentage, doesn't mean it's a majority,

00:09:22.300 but some large percentage of Americans are offended by it.

00:09:25.580 That's good enough.

00:09:27.120 That's all I need to hear.

00:09:28.380 Oh, it's offensive to a large group of people.

00:09:31.120 They have reasons that sound reasonable to me.

00:09:33.840 I mean, I could argue against it, but it's just a fact that people are offended.

00:09:37.560 So I'll just, I'll treat the fact that people feel that way as important.

00:09:43.880 Now, obviously the analogy doesn't work for a medical thing.

00:09:47.820 But the point is, if there's a huge bunch of Americans who legitimately are going to get screwed by this,

00:09:53.840 I do care.

00:09:55.580 Like, I do care.

00:09:56.740 And you should care too.

00:09:58.080 You should care because these are innocent people with a real medical problem,

00:10:02.400 and your government is going to leave them out there to just fucking twist. 0.89

00:10:07.980 It is evil.

00:10:09.920 It's just pure evil.

00:10:12.060 Now, I don't have an easy solution because I also know that it's overprescribed.

00:10:16.820 That's a real thing.

00:10:18.420 And it's like a really big, important thing.

00:10:21.140 So you just have competing interests.

00:10:23.100 But my personal ethical bias is toward the actual people who have medical use for it.

00:10:34.360 So if you don't have empathy for them,

00:10:39.780 yeah, if you don't have empathy for that group,

00:10:42.960 maybe it's because you don't know how bad it will be,

00:10:46.560 which I think is mostly the case.

00:10:48.220 But maybe just talk to some people who have an actual medical need for it,

00:10:53.440 and you're going to see some real panic,

00:10:55.440 and that panic is justified.

00:10:58.500 There's a real medical crisis coming that's big.

00:11:03.060 It's going to affect productivity, relationships, everything.

00:11:07.200 I mean, we've got a big problem coming if we don't fix that.

00:11:13.620 All right.

00:11:14.860 Here's something going my way.

00:11:16.400 Oliver Stone, who you might imagine is a left-leaning kind of a guy,

00:11:21.300 just produced a pro-nuclear energy movie

00:11:24.260 that's just completely pro-nuclear energy.

00:11:27.680 Now, I'm sure he talks about the good and the bad of it,

00:11:30.840 but it's unambiguously designed to say

00:11:34.580 the only thing that can save us from climate change is nuclear energy.

00:11:41.980 Can we all take a bow?

00:11:43.300 Well, I would say that this audience, by and large,

00:11:48.460 has been on this page for a long time.

00:11:51.120 You know, the people who are better informed about nuclear energy

00:11:54.160 have been pro-nuclear energy for years.

00:11:56.600 It's only the people who are lesser informed about the risks.

00:12:00.100 They're using an old model of the risk

00:12:02.280 that doesn't apply with the new technology.

00:12:05.880 Generation 3 nuclear plants never had a problem.

00:12:09.440 The current ones that you would build today never had a problem.

00:12:14.660 And the odds of it are not that high.

00:12:17.640 And if they did have a problem, it probably wouldn't be that big.

00:12:22.080 So, Oliver Stone, thank you.

00:12:26.180 I would consider this...

00:12:27.440 I would consider what Oliver Stone is doing

00:12:29.960 a patriotic donation to the country.

00:12:36.500 I mean, I hope he makes money on it and all that.

00:12:38.840 But to me, this just looks like pure patriotism

00:12:41.060 from somebody whose views might not always line up with mine.

00:12:45.740 I appreciate it.

00:12:47.860 All right, so I've been saying for a long time

00:12:50.280 that the Democrats don't argue in favor of keeping TikTok

00:12:53.880 because if they did, it would sound either stupid

00:12:58.000 or uninformed or nakedly political.

00:13:02.860 So they just can't say it.

00:13:06.300 They just can't.

00:13:08.760 But today they did

00:13:10.020 because I guess the CEO of TikTok

00:13:11.740 is going to be testifying to Congress

00:13:14.220 and at least the news is saying

00:13:16.500 that the Biden administration has demanded

00:13:18.840 that TikTok's Chinese owners sell their steaks.

00:13:21.140 Now, I didn't know that the Biden administration

00:13:24.160 had a clear statement like that.

00:13:27.680 That's the first time I've read that.

00:13:29.680 So it's reporting about the statement,

00:13:31.780 but I haven't seen the statement.

00:13:33.880 So I wonder...

00:13:35.540 To me, this news is not clean.

00:13:38.500 There's something missing on why suddenly

00:13:40.360 the news says that the Biden administration

00:13:42.860 wants to change TikTok's ownership.

00:13:46.260 I guess that's the softer thing than banning it.

00:13:48.500 So maybe they're looking for some way

00:13:51.420 to keep the political benefit of it

00:13:53.240 while getting rid of some of the Chinese risk of ownership. 0.58

00:13:57.900 But here's the counterargument

00:13:59.060 made by Representative Jamal Bowman.

00:14:03.420 And believe me when I say

00:14:05.620 this is the best argument

00:14:07.140 for keeping TikTok that I've seen.

00:14:10.940 It's just the best one.

00:14:14.160 Jamal says...

00:14:15.500 Jamal Bowman says...

00:14:17.820 Quote,

00:14:18.280 Republicans ain't got no swag.

00:14:20.580 That's why they want to ban TikTok.

00:14:24.500 That's why.

00:14:26.220 So his counterargument to Chinese government

00:14:30.120 having control over the data of Americans

00:14:33.560 and being able to persuade political events in America

00:14:37.180 and program our youth,

00:14:39.300 his response to that is

00:14:40.800 Republicans ain't got no swag.

00:14:42.360 That's why they want to ban TikTok.

00:14:45.060 Ain't got no swag.

00:14:46.720 Now, he is the stupidest person

00:14:48.840 that I've seen in politics

00:14:50.480 since the last time Jerry Nadler said something.

00:14:54.860 But how in the world...

00:14:57.280 How in the world can you support a team that's this stupid?

00:15:01.320 I'd love to say this is just political.

00:15:04.400 I mean, it comes off as just political.

00:15:06.280 But does he think that his own base is so stupid

00:15:09.700 that the real issue he's identified is they got no swag?

00:15:13.680 They got no swag.

00:15:15.100 Now, the context, just to be fair,

00:15:17.620 the context here is that he wants to use TikTok

00:15:20.660 to, quote, engage young people in politics.

00:15:23.620 He wants to keep young people engaged.

00:15:25.400 And he believes, this is my interpretation,

00:15:28.320 that Democrats, because they have swag,

00:15:30.980 they can use this cool new tool,

00:15:33.620 this TikTok tool,

00:15:35.980 whereas the sleepy old Republicans,

00:15:39.500 they don't know how to use this cool new tool

00:15:41.580 called TikTok.

00:15:43.060 They can't make viral memes.

00:15:45.280 So Republicans are trying to stop it

00:15:47.480 because they don't know how to make memes

00:15:49.340 and they don't know how to make viral videos.

00:15:52.900 Okay, that's your best argument?

00:15:55.620 That's stupid.

00:15:57.160 That's just stupid.

00:15:59.160 So there's some things that you can say,

00:16:01.200 well, that's a different point of view.

00:16:03.620 This is not one of those.

00:16:06.540 This is not a different point of view problem.

00:16:09.960 This is just stupid and lying.

00:16:13.660 And there's this old man with a sign

00:16:16.260 standing next to him.

00:16:17.900 They somehow got a group of ridiculous losers 0.99

00:16:21.060 to hold signs to keep TikTok.

00:16:24.060 Now, I get that people like TikTok,

00:16:27.780 but that's not the argument for keeping it.

00:16:30.700 It's really useful.

00:16:32.720 That's not the argument for keeping it.

00:16:35.740 Businesses use it to advertise it.

00:16:37.500 Yes.

00:16:38.780 Not the argument for keeping it.

00:16:41.400 None of these are even on point.

00:16:43.400 They're completely ignoring the argument.

00:16:44.960 So, anyway, it looks like the TikTok situation

00:16:49.700 is going my way

00:16:51.500 because the counter-argument has now been surfaced

00:16:53.800 and the counter-argument is stupid. 0.60

00:16:56.680 It's just stupid.

00:16:59.320 Well, here's a puzzling update.

00:17:02.360 China is developing its own mRNA vaccination.

00:17:06.800 Do they know that they shouldn't call it a vaccination?

00:17:12.660 I wonder if anybody's mentioned that to them.

00:17:17.480 So, doesn't this raise questions?

00:17:22.340 So, let's say you're an American citizen.

00:17:24.640 You've been watching the whole situation

00:17:26.420 and have not many American citizens concluded

00:17:31.660 and a number of medical professionals,

00:17:34.280 but clearly not all of them,

00:17:36.540 concluded that the mRNA thing

00:17:38.520 was a little bit dangerous in its own way.

00:17:43.380 Now, still the official word

00:17:45.020 is that it kept people alive.

00:17:47.100 That's still the official medical consensus in America.

00:17:51.660 But mostly the older people 0.99

00:17:53.160 and probably it was just more bad than good

00:17:55.020 for younger people.

00:17:56.920 But given that situation,

00:17:59.340 why would China go ahead 0.89

00:18:01.160 and do their own version of it?

00:18:04.680 Is it a version that somehow avoids,

00:18:07.460 I don't know,

00:18:07.800 the spike protein problem or something?

00:18:10.080 I mean, I don't know enough

00:18:10.900 about the science to speak of it.

00:18:13.020 But do you think in China

00:18:15.860 it's just that the pharmaceutical company,

00:18:18.180 which is fully owned by China,

00:18:20.380 do you think China's own pharmaceutical company

00:18:22.740 is just operating on lying and money

00:18:27.260 and has convinced the government of China

00:18:29.840 to do something that's bad for the government of China

00:18:33.100 because of money?

00:18:36.280 See, I see how that could work

00:18:38.360 in the American system and the European systems.

00:18:40.920 But I don't know.

00:18:43.300 It seems weird that that would be the dynamic

00:18:45.920 in the Chinese system.

00:18:48.180 So here's what I wonder.

00:18:51.360 Did the Chinese scientists not study

00:18:54.880 what happened in America with mRNA

00:18:57.300 and therefore have an updated idea

00:19:00.260 of what the risks and rewards are,

00:19:02.440 did they look at all the data that's available

00:19:04.520 and conclude that it was safe?

00:19:08.000 Did that happen?

00:19:09.060 You know, it's easy for me to imagine

00:19:12.380 there's some weird distorted thing happening in China

00:19:15.720 that might mirror our own distorted situation.

00:19:19.620 In the U.S., you could easily argue

00:19:21.580 that it was all about money

00:19:22.700 and somebody hid some data.

00:19:25.340 But now that we've got a couple of years

00:19:27.680 of mRNA experience

00:19:29.520 and China would have access

00:19:31.480 to pretty much all of the things

00:19:33.660 that our scientists have,

00:19:36.240 how do they look at it all

00:19:38.440 and say, let's do this?

00:19:40.340 Does that raise any questions with you?

00:19:43.940 I don't quite understand what's going on here.

00:19:47.060 Because if, well, let me ask you this question.

00:19:50.300 Knowing everything we know about the mRNA

00:19:52.700 as of today,

00:19:55.220 you know, today's knowledge,

00:19:56.420 if we could rewind

00:19:57.720 and the government had to do it all over again,

00:20:01.200 do you think they would have done it the same way?

00:20:04.360 Because I think they would have.

00:20:05.960 I think they would have.

00:20:06.680 Based on current data,

00:20:08.780 I think they would have.

00:20:09.900 They would have maybe given

00:20:11.260 fewer vaccinations to young people.

00:20:13.620 But I think they would have still given it over 60

00:20:15.840 and people had comorbidities.

00:20:19.560 That's what I think.

00:20:20.480 I think that's what they would say

00:20:21.640 based on the current information.

00:20:23.660 Now, the thing we don't know

00:20:24.880 is what happens in the long run.

00:20:28.360 You know, does your body get degraded

00:20:30.040 in some long run way?

00:20:31.000 But, you know, the Chinese have all the same information 1.00

00:20:33.560 we do, I'll bet.

00:20:36.280 So I don't, I guess it's a confusing situation.

00:20:39.480 I don't know why they would.

00:20:41.740 Now, the benefit of the mRNA platform

00:20:44.540 is that you can more quickly come up with a vaccine,

00:20:49.360 let's call it, vaccine.

00:20:51.060 You can do it more quickly than the old way of,

00:20:56.160 you know, well, the old way.

00:20:58.540 So apparently they think that catching up

00:21:00.360 or keeping up with the variants

00:21:02.440 is more important than whatever risk

00:21:04.840 the platform brings.

00:21:07.220 I don't know, it's just curious

00:21:08.300 that they would make that decision.

00:21:09.980 So here's a story that's super alarming.

00:21:18.360 According to the New York Post

00:21:19.620 and Miranda Devine. 0.99

00:21:22.260 Now, you remember Miranda was,

00:21:24.000 I think, the first reporter

00:21:25.580 on the Hunter Biden laptop story.

00:21:28.280 So we know her to be credible and accurate.

00:21:33.380 So that's your context.

00:21:35.560 Somebody who's credible on this very domain

00:21:38.020 and accurate.

00:21:38.800 But this story, I think,

00:21:40.760 is short of being confirmed.

00:21:43.260 So I'm not going to say I believe the story

00:21:44.980 on the first telling.

00:21:46.760 But what we know about the story,

00:21:48.920 according to Miranda, who is credible,

00:21:51.360 is very disturbing.

00:21:52.820 And it goes like this.

00:21:54.680 There's some gentleman, Robert Hinnock.

00:22:01.140 Oh, no, I'm sorry.

00:22:02.780 Mr. Luft is the person.

00:22:04.700 He said that he had some kind of deep

00:22:07.180 contacts with intel people.

00:22:10.520 And he's just one of these guys

00:22:11.900 who has a lot of deep contacts

00:22:14.340 with the intelligence world.

00:22:16.140 He says he tried four years ago

00:22:17.880 to inform the Department of Justice

00:22:19.500 in the U.S.

00:22:20.240 He's not an American. 0.99

00:22:21.840 That the Chinese state-controlled

00:22:23.240 energy company, CEFC,

00:22:25.920 had paid $100,000 a month

00:22:27.880 to President Biden's son, Hunter,

00:22:30.020 and $65,000 to Joe's brother, Jim,

00:22:33.780 in exchange for their FBI connections,

00:22:37.240 which is rumored to be

00:22:38.760 some connection guy, one eye.

00:22:41.080 That's some FBI guy

00:22:42.320 who was telling him insider stuff

00:22:43.760 from the FBI.

00:22:44.800 And they were using their FBI insider,

00:22:48.520 presumably illegal sources,

00:22:51.080 because I can't imagine

00:22:52.020 this would be legal,

00:22:52.980 and using the Biden's name

00:22:56.740 to promote China's

00:22:57.800 Belt and Road Initiative.

00:22:59.540 All right.

00:23:00.040 So there's this guy

00:23:01.540 not from the U.S.

00:23:02.900 He might be Israeli.

00:23:05.660 I think he's an Israeli citizen.

00:23:07.420 He gets picked up in Cyprus

00:23:09.360 on behalf of the United States.

00:23:13.060 So here's a guy

00:23:14.160 who's been warning

00:23:15.000 that he has direct

00:23:16.080 personal knowledge

00:23:17.100 because he learned

00:23:18.360 of the scheme,

00:23:19.620 the Hunter Biden scheme.

00:23:20.660 He learned it

00:23:21.300 through his own relationship

00:23:22.640 with Hunter's

00:23:23.820 Chinese business partners.

00:23:25.780 He didn't hear it

00:23:27.020 from a third-hand party.

00:23:28.800 He heard it from the people

00:23:30.400 who were paying Hunter directly

00:23:32.480 because he knows him personally.

00:23:35.060 That's a really good source.

00:23:37.740 So this really good source,

00:23:39.900 who has information

00:23:41.180 about Biden family

00:23:42.740 and FBI corruption,

00:23:44.240 was picked up in Cyprus

00:23:46.040 for being an arms dealer,

00:23:49.080 for being an arms dealer.

00:23:51.300 Do you know what he says

00:23:52.020 about that?

00:23:53.520 The guy who was picked up?

00:23:54.740 He says,

00:23:55.080 I've been arrested in Cyprus

00:23:56.180 on a politically motivated

00:23:57.640 extradition request

00:23:58.940 by the U.S.

00:24:00.300 The U.S.

00:24:01.400 claiming I'm an arms dealer.

00:24:03.320 It would be funny

00:24:04.300 if it weren't tragic.

00:24:05.680 I've never been an arms dealer.

00:24:08.180 Don't you think

00:24:08.880 that that would be easy

00:24:09.780 to prove or disprove

00:24:10.940 that he was

00:24:12.300 or was not an arms dealer?

00:24:16.140 I've got a feeling

00:24:17.120 that he's not an arms dealer

00:24:18.480 and that it might be

00:24:19.960 exactly what it looks like,

00:24:21.720 which is he was arrested

00:24:23.320 because he's a critic

00:24:24.380 of the Bidens

00:24:25.080 and has actually information

00:24:26.560 that would put them all in jail.

00:24:28.760 That's what it looks like.

00:24:30.640 Now, it's way too early.

00:24:32.760 Fog of war.

00:24:33.820 You know,

00:24:34.040 first versions of stories

00:24:35.360 tend to change.

00:24:36.760 So I wouldn't go all the way

00:24:38.340 to believe in that.

00:24:39.700 But if later you find out

00:24:41.260 that this gentleman

00:24:43.020 does indeed have no connection

00:24:45.620 whatsoever to arms dealing,

00:24:48.220 then I think you know

00:24:49.040 what you need to know.

00:24:50.940 And I'm pretty sure

00:24:52.220 that you don't say

00:24:52.980 something like this.

00:24:55.300 This is just my liar filter,

00:24:58.200 my BS filter.

00:24:59.600 My BS filter says

00:25:00.880 you don't say this sentence

00:25:02.720 unless it's true.

00:25:04.460 Here's the sentence.

00:25:06.320 The U.S.

00:25:07.180 claiming I'm an arms dealer.

00:25:08.640 It would be funny

00:25:09.960 if it weren't tragic.

00:25:11.420 I've never been an arms dealer.

00:25:13.800 I've never been an arms dealer.

00:25:16.180 And that it's funny?

00:25:17.780 That's somebody

00:25:18.660 who's telling the truth.

00:25:21.120 Now, if that's a lie,

00:25:23.160 I would be very surprised.

00:25:26.420 Because liars don't talk like that.

00:25:28.920 This is the cleanest,

00:25:30.300 most direct denial

00:25:31.600 of something that presumably

00:25:33.420 would be easy to prove.

00:25:36.100 It would be easy to prove

00:25:37.040 one way or another.

00:25:37.560 So you don't say something

00:25:38.840 so declaratively,

00:25:41.160 absolutely,

00:25:42.400 I've never been an arms dealer.

00:25:44.040 unless you can back that up.

00:25:47.700 See, what would he say

00:25:48.520 if he were guilty?

00:25:50.680 Here's how guilty people talk.

00:25:52.400 They have no evidence

00:25:53.400 of these charges.

00:25:55.260 Right?

00:25:55.840 The evidence,

00:25:56.520 it's a trumped up charge.

00:25:59.100 Right?

00:25:59.760 They don't mention the details.

00:26:01.560 It's very unusual

00:26:02.520 for somebody to say directly,

00:26:04.120 I've never had anything

00:26:05.300 to do with this.

00:26:07.160 Just,

00:26:07.540 I'm not even involved

00:26:08.400 in any way.

00:26:09.000 that's an unusual denial

00:26:11.020 for somebody

00:26:12.380 who would be guilty.

00:26:14.020 So,

00:26:14.520 he's signaling innocence,

00:26:16.240 pretty clearly.

00:26:18.520 And he's signaling

00:26:19.560 that he does have

00:26:20.360 the goods on the Bidens.

00:26:23.100 And it looks like

00:26:24.220 the Biden crime family

00:26:25.800 is exactly what it looks like.

00:26:29.260 It's literally

00:26:30.180 an organized crime situation.

00:26:34.320 It's hard for me

00:26:35.160 to come to any other conclusion

00:26:36.620 than it's literally

00:26:38.060 organized crime.

00:26:40.020 That's,

00:26:40.880 it's hard to imagine

00:26:41.940 any other,

00:26:42.520 any other explanation.

00:26:44.140 But,

00:26:44.540 like I say,

00:26:45.060 it's early.

00:26:45.700 Anything could happen

00:26:46.580 to change the story.

00:26:49.420 Some people are saying

00:26:50.460 that the prosecutor,

00:26:52.200 Alvin Bragg,

00:26:52.940 who's trying to put

00:26:53.540 Trump in jail,

00:26:54.700 should be in jail himself,

00:26:56.100 and I agree with that.

00:26:57.500 I would say,

00:26:58.160 based on what we've seen

00:26:59.240 so far,

00:27:00.620 if it turns,

00:27:01.260 if it turns out

00:27:02.040 that what we know so far

00:27:03.480 or think we do

00:27:04.420 turns out to be true,

00:27:06.040 I don't know

00:27:07.340 if he's committed

00:27:07.960 technically a crime,

00:27:09.860 but he is someone

00:27:10.600 who should be in jail

00:27:11.620 if you had a functional system

00:27:13.460 that was working well.

00:27:15.960 He should be,

00:27:17.000 based on what we know.

00:27:18.780 And what we know

00:27:19.740 is that he signaled

00:27:21.080 in advance

00:27:21.700 that he was going

00:27:22.480 after Trump

00:27:23.100 before he had a crime.

00:27:25.540 That's good enough.

00:27:27.220 That's good enough.

00:27:28.820 If the only thing you know

00:27:29.960 is he ran for office

00:27:30.920 promising to get Trump

00:27:32.260 before he knew

00:27:33.920 what possibly

00:27:35.000 he would charge him with,

00:27:36.900 that's good enough.

00:27:39.120 That's everything

00:27:39.640 you need to know.

00:27:40.820 That's a criminal

00:27:41.880 who may not have

00:27:44.220 broken a specific law,

00:27:46.400 but in all the ways

00:27:48.540 that the word criminal

00:27:49.500 is important,

00:27:50.560 except for maybe

00:27:51.260 the penalty,

00:27:52.780 that's criminal.

00:27:54.480 To tell me

00:27:55.560 that I should only

00:27:56.300 call that unethical,

00:27:58.560 I'm sorry.

00:27:59.620 I'm not going to call

00:28:00.400 that just political.

00:28:01.260 I'm not going to call

00:28:02.620 it unethical.

00:28:04.040 That's a fucking crime.

00:28:05.940 If you tell me

00:28:06.840 there's nothing

00:28:07.420 on the books

00:28:07.920 that makes that criminal,

00:28:09.280 okay,

00:28:10.040 I'll listen to that.

00:28:11.480 I might even say

00:28:12.380 that's true.

00:28:13.260 Still criminal.

00:28:14.800 It's a crime.

00:28:16.700 I don't care

00:28:17.460 if it's legal or not.

00:28:22.300 Apparently,

00:28:22.960 there's a new document

00:28:23.900 uncovered,

00:28:24.820 which we had not

00:28:25.880 been aware of,

00:28:26.620 and it makes me wonder

00:28:27.580 if the grand jury

00:28:28.960 was aware of it either.

00:28:29.920 that it's a 2018 document

00:28:32.780 from Michael Cohen's

00:28:34.440 own attorney,

00:28:35.720 so he's no longer

00:28:36.800 the attorney,

00:28:37.380 I believe,

00:28:38.280 and a letter to the

00:28:39.140 Federal Election Commission

00:28:40.480 says that the payments,

00:28:42.820 these payments

00:28:43.380 to Stormy Daniel,

00:28:44.660 the payment in question

00:28:45.600 does not constitute

00:28:46.640 a campaign contribution,

00:28:48.680 and according to this letter

00:28:51.400 at the time,

00:28:52.140 2018,

00:28:53.200 it was Michael Cohen's

00:28:54.540 own money.

00:28:55.040 It was his own money.

00:28:59.020 Now,

00:28:59.620 I don't think

00:29:00.480 that's a complete defense,

00:29:02.500 but what is a complete defense

00:29:04.300 is that we didn't see

00:29:05.460 that letter until now.

00:29:07.260 If it's true

00:29:08.320 that this just arose,

00:29:10.900 but it's been around

00:29:11.840 since 2018,

00:29:13.820 it's very,

00:29:14.780 it's very,

00:29:15.780 let's say,

00:29:16.920 positive for Trump's side.

00:29:19.000 if Alvin Bragg

00:29:21.080 intentionally

00:29:21.840 kept this bit of evidence

00:29:23.680 from the public,

00:29:24.580 again,

00:29:25.020 I don't think

00:29:25.800 it's a confirmation

00:29:26.440 of anything,

00:29:27.340 but it's an important

00:29:28.480 piece of evidence.

00:29:29.980 If the grand jury

00:29:31.420 didn't see this,

00:29:33.540 then Alvin Bragg,

00:29:34.860 if he intentionally

00:29:36.020 kept it from him,

00:29:37.940 I would think

00:29:38.600 that's criminal.

00:29:39.660 Again,

00:29:40.040 I don't know

00:29:40.380 if it's illegal,

00:29:41.800 but it's a crime

00:29:43.140 by any basic standard

00:29:45.660 of human behavior.

00:29:50.400 So,

00:29:51.680 yeah,

00:29:54.080 I guess it was

00:29:54.660 Senator Rand Paul

00:29:55.720 who said that

00:29:56.480 the Manhattan DA,

00:29:58.400 Alvin Bragg,

00:29:58.940 should be in jail.

00:29:59.980 That's different

00:30:00.560 from saying

00:30:01.040 he violated

00:30:02.640 a specific crime.

00:30:04.480 I would say

00:30:05.260 that the world

00:30:06.080 would be better

00:30:06.680 if he were in jail.

00:30:08.520 I agree with that.

00:30:10.120 He seems like somebody

00:30:11.120 who is only bad

00:30:12.240 for the world,

00:30:13.140 does not have

00:30:14.160 good intentions,

00:30:15.380 is signaling

00:30:15.980 his bad intentions

00:30:16.960 as loudly

00:30:17.600 as anybody possibly could,

00:30:19.160 and then he's

00:30:19.660 playing out

00:30:20.120 his bad intentions

00:30:21.120 and malign

00:30:22.820 point of view

00:30:24.180 right in front of us.

00:30:25.340 Yeah,

00:30:25.640 that's somebody

00:30:26.240 that you want in jail.

00:30:28.080 You want them in jail.

00:30:29.740 The world would be better

00:30:30.860 if he were in jail.

00:30:31.740 That's just a fact.

00:30:34.980 Well,

00:30:35.800 one of my favorite

00:30:37.540 commentators,

00:30:38.660 Van Jones,

00:30:40.240 said on CNN

00:30:41.360 that he would not

00:30:42.560 be surprised

00:30:43.300 if Alvin Bragg

00:30:45.100 held back

00:30:45.740 an indictment

00:30:46.320 of former Trump

00:30:47.340 or former President Trump

00:30:48.500 arguing that the prosecutor

00:30:50.520 should wait

00:30:51.100 for the former president

00:30:52.180 to be slapped

00:30:53.560 with more serious charges.

00:30:57.740 And I guess,

00:30:59.260 I guess Van Jones

00:31:00.820 said on CNN,

00:31:02.340 quote,

00:31:02.820 I think that the heat

00:31:03.760 is on this DA.

00:31:04.640 I think he's going

00:31:05.560 to make

00:31:06.020 a very sober decision

00:31:07.960 and I would not

00:31:09.160 be surprised

00:31:09.760 if he doesn't

00:31:10.360 step back

00:31:10.980 from the brink.

00:31:14.300 So,

00:31:15.540 you see why I say

00:31:17.280 Van Jones

00:31:18.520 is one of your

00:31:19.180 most useful voices

00:31:21.940 in politics?

00:31:22.940 And what I mean by that

00:31:24.060 is he's willing

00:31:24.720 to look at the whole field

00:31:26.060 and then talk

00:31:27.420 as though he's seen

00:31:28.180 the whole field.

00:31:29.840 Now,

00:31:30.340 if you read

00:31:31.440 between the lines,

00:31:32.420 I think he's

00:31:32.980 clearly indicating

00:31:34.240 in the softest way

00:31:36.420 you can

00:31:36.760 to the CNN audience

00:31:37.800 that this is in fact

00:31:39.400 a political operation

00:31:40.740 and not about the law.

00:31:43.260 Now,

00:31:43.520 he didn't say

00:31:44.140 this is political

00:31:45.060 but

00:31:46.480 that's

00:31:47.880 the indication

00:31:49.020 that you would get

00:31:49.920 if you said

00:31:50.760 you would wait

00:31:52.320 for a more serious charge

00:31:53.700 and he's going to

00:31:54.660 step back from the brink

00:31:55.800 because of political pressure.

00:31:57.960 If political pressure

00:31:59.180 makes you

00:32:00.120 pull back,

00:32:01.000 we don't know

00:32:01.480 that that's happened

00:32:02.140 but it might be,

00:32:02.820 if political pressure

00:32:04.880 makes you move back

00:32:05.880 then it was

00:32:07.080 a political process

00:32:08.500 because I don't believe

00:32:10.080 if they had

00:32:11.340 a real crime

00:32:12.240 that political pressure

00:32:13.920 would make any difference.

00:32:16.120 Political pressure

00:32:16.840 doesn't make you

00:32:17.440 stop prosecuting

00:32:18.360 an actual criminal,

00:32:20.300 does it?

00:32:21.540 Political pressure

00:32:22.560 could only help you

00:32:23.800 against somebody

00:32:24.860 who's clearly

00:32:25.400 not a real criminal.

00:32:27.780 I mean,

00:32:28.400 I think.

00:32:29.660 Have you ever heard

00:32:30.320 of a story

00:32:30.880 where political pressure

00:32:32.700 got somebody off

00:32:33.840 from the public?

00:32:37.640 OJ.

00:32:38.500 Well,

00:32:38.760 that's in the jury.

00:32:40.980 I'm not going

00:32:41.660 to count the jury

00:32:42.280 but the question

00:32:43.600 to prosecute or not?

00:32:46.860 I don't know.

00:32:47.940 If there's a real crime,

00:32:49.180 I think they always prosecute.

00:32:50.600 If there's a sketchy,

00:32:52.160 gray area,

00:32:53.560 novel legal theory,

00:32:55.340 then maybe they don't

00:32:56.580 because of political pressure.

00:32:57.760 I think that's where we are.

00:32:58.600 All right.

00:33:01.000 So,

00:33:01.900 I guess the grand jury

00:33:02.900 meets again today

00:33:03.700 so we don't know

00:33:04.380 if anything's delayed.

00:33:05.680 It could be just

00:33:06.260 normal process

00:33:07.080 because everything

00:33:07.940 in the world

00:33:08.440 is later than you think.

00:33:10.380 Well,

00:33:11.520 President Biden's

00:33:13.020 spokesperson,

00:33:14.360 John Pierre blah blah,

00:33:16.480 I've decided

00:33:17.560 that I'm not going

00:33:18.220 to learn more than

00:33:19.100 two names

00:33:19.980 for any one person.

00:33:21.780 It's just sort of a rule.

00:33:23.660 So,

00:33:24.840 you know,

00:33:25.160 I remember my own name,

00:33:27.040 Scott Adams.

00:33:28.520 I don't make you

00:33:29.520 remember my middle name

00:33:30.660 because I feel

00:33:31.860 three is too much.

00:33:33.420 Three is too much.

00:33:34.480 I can barely remember

00:33:35.700 somebody's first name

00:33:36.800 but

00:33:37.960 if somebody comes at me

00:33:40.360 with a three-name situation,

00:33:42.480 I'm just going to

00:33:43.480 take the first two.

00:33:45.080 So,

00:33:45.480 she's just

00:33:45.860 Jean-Pierre to me.

00:33:46.880 I can't be bothered

00:33:47.780 with third names

00:33:48.820 of people.

00:33:49.840 No disrespect

00:33:50.680 to Jean-Pierre.

00:33:51.660 Just generally speaking,

00:33:54.520 I like two names maximum.

00:33:56.360 That's all I can handle.

00:33:57.900 So,

00:33:58.460 she was asked

00:33:58.980 about the story

00:33:59.780 of the

00:34:00.380 documented

00:34:01.760 evidence

00:34:03.200 that the Biden family

00:34:04.540 received money

00:34:05.320 from

00:34:05.800 foreign entity

00:34:07.140 and here is

00:34:08.580 the perfectly

00:34:09.240 sensible

00:34:09.860 and coherent answer

00:34:11.120 from

00:34:12.460 Jean-Pierre

00:34:13.460 blah blah 0.97

00:34:14.440 last name

00:34:15.920 and she said

00:34:17.260 look,

00:34:18.940 I'm just

00:34:19.740 not going to

00:34:20.580 respond to that

00:34:21.400 from here.

00:34:22.700 Look,

00:34:23.400 we have heard

00:34:24.040 from House Republicans

00:34:24.900 for years and years

00:34:26.060 how the inaccuracies

00:34:28.220 and lies

00:34:28.960 when it comes

00:34:29.500 to this issue

00:34:30.100 and

00:34:30.820 I don't even know

00:34:32.160 where to begin

00:34:32.740 to even answer

00:34:33.680 that question

00:34:34.260 because,

00:34:35.020 again,

00:34:36.020 it's been lies

00:34:36.860 and lies

00:34:37.340 and inaccuracy

00:34:38.060 for the past

00:34:38.660 couple of years

00:34:39.280 and I'm just

00:34:40.300 not going to get

00:34:41.120 into it from here.

00:34:41.920 all right,

00:34:44.980 so that's what

00:34:45.740 the actual

00:34:46.440 paid human being

00:34:47.720 who is

00:34:49.680 living proof

00:34:50.500 that

00:34:50.920 if you

00:34:53.300 try to satisfy

00:34:54.320 too many requirements

00:34:55.700 you get this.

00:34:58.460 So,

00:34:59.420 I think

00:35:00.780 it's perfectly

00:35:01.960 good for the country

00:35:03.320 to have a

00:35:05.200 spokesperson

00:35:05.660 as the president

00:35:07.260 who's a woman 0.62

00:35:08.060 for example.

00:35:08.880 I think

00:35:10.220 that's good.

00:35:11.140 It's good

00:35:11.540 that it's not

00:35:12.500 all a bunch

00:35:12.980 of white men

00:35:13.580 or something.

00:35:14.240 So,

00:35:14.420 I like that

00:35:14.780 she's a woman. 0.82

00:35:16.700 I like that

00:35:17.780 the spokesperson

00:35:18.600 for the president

00:35:19.340 can be black,

00:35:20.780 of course.

00:35:22.100 You know,

00:35:22.500 everybody

00:35:23.080 should be

00:35:24.120 equal opportunity.

00:35:25.560 So,

00:35:25.800 I like that

00:35:26.100 she's black. 0.97

00:35:26.760 I like that

00:35:27.160 she's a woman. 0.82

00:35:28.100 She's also,

00:35:28.880 I believe,

00:35:29.480 LGBTQ.

00:35:31.040 I like that too.

00:35:32.360 I like that

00:35:32.940 we've got a spokesperson

00:35:33.920 who's LGBTQ.

00:35:34.760 But the question

00:35:36.080 I ask

00:35:36.640 is if you work

00:35:38.040 so hard

00:35:38.440 to get all three

00:35:39.200 of those,

00:35:40.500 well,

00:35:40.920 black,

00:35:41.420 check,

00:35:41.940 that's good.

00:35:43.000 Woman, 1.00

00:35:43.540 check,

00:35:44.120 that's a plus.

00:35:45.720 LBGTQ,

00:35:46.680 great.

00:35:47.480 Glad everybody

00:35:48.400 gets the opportunity.

00:35:49.860 But are we really

00:35:51.100 going to pretend

00:35:51.720 that if you don't

00:35:52.500 try to get all three

00:35:53.320 of those things

00:35:53.860 you don't end up

00:35:54.500 with the worst

00:35:54.940 candidates?

00:35:56.100 On average.

00:35:57.780 I'm still allowing

00:35:58.640 that the best person

00:35:59.800 in the world

00:36:00.320 could be a black

00:36:02.200 lesbian.

00:36:03.500 could be the best

00:36:05.120 president we've

00:36:06.140 ever had.

00:36:07.480 Could be amazing.

00:36:09.040 In fact,

00:36:10.420 probably plenty

00:36:11.520 of examples of that.

00:36:12.680 My only point is

00:36:13.640 if you're focusing

00:36:15.560 on those things

00:36:16.720 as your main requirement,

00:36:18.300 you might leave

00:36:18.940 a little money

00:36:20.500 on the table.

00:36:22.100 And you might get

00:36:22.720 somebody who can

00:36:23.320 only answer a question

00:36:24.260 like this.

00:36:25.120 Look,

00:36:25.780 I'm just not going

00:36:26.600 to respond to that

00:36:27.400 from here.

00:36:27.960 Look,

00:36:28.860 we have heard...

00:36:30.500 All right,

00:36:30.920 now let's compare

00:36:31.720 her performance

00:36:32.860 to AI.

00:36:34.700 I saw a tweet

00:36:35.420 from Kenneth Raposa

00:36:36.800 who says,

00:36:38.120 I asked my new

00:36:38.840 friend Chet GPT

00:36:39.960 to pretend it was

00:36:40.860 a White House

00:36:41.360 press secretary

00:36:42.100 and I was a journalist

00:36:43.520 asking for a question.

00:36:45.340 And I said,

00:36:46.580 now I'm not going

00:36:49.480 to read you

00:36:50.020 the AI answer

00:36:51.740 to this.

00:36:52.840 I will simply say

00:36:54.040 that the AI's answer

00:36:55.320 was really professional.

00:36:57.920 It was complete.

00:36:59.540 Hit every note

00:37:00.400 you'd want to hit

00:37:01.160 and was a real

00:37:02.780 good representation

00:37:03.640 of the office

00:37:04.600 of the president.

00:37:07.920 Or,

00:37:08.760 you could hire

00:37:09.600 the three-checkbox

00:37:12.120 person who says,

00:37:13.720 look,

00:37:14.140 I'm just not going

00:37:15.060 to respond to that

00:37:15.860 from here.

00:37:17.580 From here?

00:37:19.000 Was there some

00:37:19.600 other place

00:37:20.080 she was going

00:37:20.440 to respond to it?

00:37:22.020 I'll respond to it

00:37:23.100 over there,

00:37:24.180 but I'm not going

00:37:24.940 to respond to it

00:37:25.580 from here.

00:37:26.040 I mean,

00:37:26.280 it's just,

00:37:26.660 it's babble.

00:37:28.100 It's just babble.

00:37:28.980 So,

00:37:30.780 think back

00:37:32.540 to not too

00:37:33.540 long ago.

00:37:35.000 Do you remember

00:37:35.900 not too long ago

00:37:36.840 I told you

00:37:37.580 that the reason

00:37:38.300 that AI

00:37:39.380 will not be

00:37:40.460 indistinguishable

00:37:41.480 from humans

00:37:42.380 is that nobody's

00:37:43.920 going to make

00:37:44.300 AI act stupid.

00:37:47.600 Unless you make

00:37:48.600 your AI act

00:37:49.540 as stupid

00:37:50.060 as John Pierre

00:37:51.300 blah blah 0.97

00:37:51.920 last name,

00:37:52.940 you're never

00:37:53.920 going to think

00:37:54.340 it's a human.

00:37:55.800 You're going to say,

00:37:56.460 oh,

00:37:56.740 those answers

00:37:57.300 were all good.

00:37:58.140 It must be AI.

00:37:58.860 That's always

00:38:00.920 been the problem.

00:38:02.520 It's always

00:38:03.140 been the problem

00:38:03.900 that you'd have

00:38:04.680 to make AI

00:38:05.300 dumber

00:38:05.700 to make it

00:38:06.640 believable.

00:38:07.720 It's hard

00:38:08.440 to wrap

00:38:09.080 your head

00:38:09.320 around that.

00:38:11.600 Rasmussen

00:38:12.060 has a poll

00:38:12.680 asking whether,

00:38:15.940 asking likely

00:38:16.740 U.S. voters,

00:38:17.940 do they believe

00:38:18.580 that Biden

00:38:18.960 has told

00:38:19.380 the complete

00:38:19.880 truth

00:38:20.320 about his

00:38:20.960 family's

00:38:21.420 foreign business

00:38:22.140 deals?

00:38:25.160 How many

00:38:25.960 American voters

00:38:27.180 do you think

00:38:28.000 and you're

00:38:29.960 allowed to

00:38:30.320 use your

00:38:30.640 ESB for

00:38:31.240 this?

00:38:32.120 In fact,

00:38:32.560 you can

00:38:32.800 answer the

00:38:33.200 question

00:38:33.460 before I

00:38:34.160 ask it.

00:38:35.600 Oh,

00:38:35.840 you're good.

00:38:37.480 So the

00:38:38.060 question is,

00:38:39.100 how many

00:38:39.500 think that

00:38:40.220 it's very

00:38:41.400 likely,

00:38:42.720 very likely,

00:38:43.600 that Biden

00:38:44.860 has told

00:38:45.340 the complete

00:38:46.000 truth about

00:38:46.660 his family's

00:38:47.260 foreign business

00:38:47.820 deals?

00:38:48.060 Oh,

00:38:50.680 wow,

00:38:50.900 your guesses

00:38:51.360 are really

00:38:52.680 close.

00:38:53.600 It's 24%.

00:38:54.860 Yeah,

00:38:55.880 you guessed

00:38:56.240 25.

00:38:56.960 Wow.

00:38:58.140 Wow.

00:38:58.700 Good job.

00:38:59.800 Good job.

00:39:00.760 Smartest

00:39:01.260 audience in

00:39:01.800 the world.

00:39:04.840 But,

00:39:05.440 let's see,

00:39:06.520 65% think,

00:39:09.020 let's see,

00:39:09.900 there was

00:39:10.140 another number

00:39:10.660 here that was

00:39:11.040 interesting.

00:39:13.320 65% of

00:39:14.380 voters believe

00:39:15.000 that Biden

00:39:15.400 family Chinese

00:39:16.180 connection is a

00:39:17.160 serious scandal.

00:39:18.880 So two

00:39:19.340 thirds of

00:39:19.840 the country

00:39:20.260 thinks that

00:39:22.180 it may not

00:39:22.700 be illegal,

00:39:23.280 but it's a

00:39:23.680 serious scandal.

00:39:27.020 Has there

00:39:27.640 ever been a

00:39:28.120 better week

00:39:28.580 for Trump?

00:39:30.080 I think

00:39:30.700 Trump's having

00:39:31.260 his very best

00:39:31.940 week.

00:39:33.140 Two thirds

00:39:33.580 of the country

00:39:34.160 thinks that

00:39:35.280 Biden is in

00:39:36.300 a scandal

00:39:36.980 with our

00:39:37.460 biggest

00:39:37.720 adversary,

00:39:38.440 China.

00:39:39.580 At the

00:39:39.940 same time,

00:39:41.320 I think the

00:39:41.920 majority of

00:39:42.420 the country

00:39:42.760 thinks that

00:39:43.320 this Alan

00:39:43.780 Bragg thing 0.97

00:39:44.300 is purely

00:39:44.760 political.

00:39:45.240 So everything

00:39:47.620 that you

00:39:48.260 imagined in

00:39:50.340 your

00:39:50.700 conspiratorial

00:39:51.840 mind is

00:39:53.120 actually looking

00:39:54.880 to be true.

00:39:56.240 I mean,

00:39:57.040 you never

00:39:57.720 know.

00:39:58.880 But it

00:39:59.460 looks like

00:40:00.260 there is a

00:40:01.300 huge scandal

00:40:02.020 with money

00:40:03.100 coming from

00:40:03.660 China and

00:40:04.140 maybe Ukraine.

00:40:05.240 It looks like

00:40:06.180 the prosecution

00:40:07.140 or potential

00:40:08.260 prosecution of

00:40:09.080 Trump on

00:40:09.680 this trumped

00:40:10.660 up charges

00:40:11.200 are completely

00:40:13.060 political

00:40:13.540 bullshit.

00:40:14.980 It's

00:40:15.200 everything you

00:40:15.660 thought it

00:40:15.920 was.

00:40:16.940 Here's another

00:40:17.460 story about

00:40:18.060 a professor

00:40:19.940 in Florida,

00:40:22.000 UCF

00:40:22.600 professor,

00:40:23.700 fired for

00:40:24.400 rejecting,

00:40:25.040 this is a

00:40:25.720 Fox News

00:40:26.160 story,

00:40:26.900 for rejecting

00:40:27.540 the notion

00:40:28.100 of systemic

00:40:29.940 racism.

00:40:31.740 And he

00:40:32.340 said that

00:40:32.820 the diversity

00:40:33.500 movement is

00:40:34.160 pretty much

00:40:34.680 anti-white

00:40:35.640 movement.

00:40:37.280 So he

00:40:37.900 got shunned

00:40:39.480 and banned,

00:40:40.300 but he got

00:40:40.620 his job

00:40:41.000 back.

00:40:41.360 Then you

00:40:42.940 read this

00:40:43.300 whole thing

00:40:43.640 where he's

00:40:44.000 saying that

00:40:44.440 the whole

00:40:44.860 DEI stuff

00:40:45.860 is just

00:40:46.380 an anti-white

00:40:47.100 movement in

00:40:47.740 disguise.

00:40:48.840 That's basically

00:40:49.460 all it is.

00:40:51.100 And he

00:40:54.060 got sort of

00:40:54.600 semi-cancelled,

00:40:55.480 but he got

00:40:55.800 back to work,

00:40:56.720 but all of his

00:40:57.560 co-workers won't

00:40:58.360 talk to him.

00:40:59.120 He's like shunned

00:41:00.020 at work.

00:41:01.020 But he's saying

00:41:01.560 that's fine,

00:41:02.220 because we're all

00:41:02.660 idiots, 0.99

00:41:03.100 basically.

00:41:04.080 I said that

00:41:04.840 part about all

00:41:05.400 idiots, 0.99

00:41:05.840 but he said,

00:41:06.540 yeah,

00:41:06.700 that's fine.

00:41:07.200 He doesn't

00:41:07.560 mind if people

00:41:08.120 like that

00:41:08.460 shun him.

00:41:08.840 But are

00:41:11.620 you waiting

00:41:11.960 for the,

00:41:12.420 here's the

00:41:12.800 punchline.

00:41:14.560 All right?

00:41:15.880 Just hear the

00:41:17.040 headline,

00:41:17.860 and then listen,

00:41:18.500 wait for the

00:41:18.880 punchline that's

00:41:19.560 way at the

00:41:20.000 back of the

00:41:20.440 story.

00:41:21.460 Headline,

00:41:22.680 Professor

00:41:23.120 Rejects

00:41:23.780 Systemic

00:41:24.220 Racism,

00:41:24.800 Says 0.93

00:41:25.000 It's

00:41:25.200 Anti-White.

00:41:27.360 Professor

00:41:27.920 himself is

00:41:29.020 half-white,

00:41:30.300 half-Hispanic,

00:41:31.380 and fully

00:41:32.140 gay. 0.93

00:41:33.700 Fully

00:41:34.200 gay. 0.93

00:41:34.460 And apparently

00:41:36.080 being gay

00:41:36.700 and half-Hispanic

00:41:37.640 was just

00:41:39.340 enough to

00:41:39.780 get your

00:41:40.080 job back,

00:41:41.240 but not

00:41:42.200 enough to

00:41:42.640 be happily

00:41:43.180 employed.

00:41:44.480 You can

00:41:45.100 still get

00:41:45.760 your job

00:41:46.240 back,

00:41:46.660 but we're

00:41:47.020 not completely

00:41:48.220 comfortable

00:41:48.700 with you.

00:41:49.860 Oh,

00:41:50.340 yeah,

00:41:51.140 you can

00:41:51.540 say you're

00:41:52.760 gay, 0.74

00:41:54.020 but that's

00:41:55.800 not enough

00:41:56.280 lately.

00:41:57.200 Lately,

00:41:57.760 that's not

00:41:58.160 enough.

00:41:58.900 So,

00:41:59.300 just if you

00:41:59.860 want to know

00:42:00.240 where the

00:42:00.520 edge is.

00:42:01.800 So,

00:42:02.080 here's another

00:42:02.580 case,

00:42:03.200 this story is

00:42:03.860 another case

00:42:04.360 of things

00:42:04.760 going my

00:42:05.320 way,

00:42:06.000 because I

00:42:06.860 think this

00:42:07.380 is the

00:42:07.700 sort of

00:42:08.060 story you're

00:42:08.580 seeing more

00:42:09.100 of,

00:42:10.040 because I've

00:42:11.620 expanded the

00:42:12.300 conversation.

00:42:14.060 And I

00:42:14.420 expanded it

00:42:15.060 to people

00:42:16.660 who are

00:42:17.640 not going

00:42:18.020 to get

00:42:18.260 canceled,

00:42:19.200 saying it

00:42:20.200 looks to

00:42:20.620 me like

00:42:21.000 this stuff

00:42:21.420 is anti-white.

00:42:23.000 You can

00:42:23.360 now say

00:42:23.700 that.

00:42:25.080 You're

00:42:25.540 welcome.

00:42:26.580 I'm pretty

00:42:27.160 sure that

00:42:27.540 that was

00:42:27.840 me.

00:42:28.940 I'm pretty

00:42:29.580 sure that

00:42:30.020 was me,

00:42:31.300 that a

00:42:32.460 regular

00:42:33.060 person,

00:42:33.640 who doesn't

00:42:34.220 want to

00:42:34.440 get canceled,

00:42:35.540 can say,

00:42:36.180 you know,

00:42:36.460 the impact

00:42:37.100 of this

00:42:37.480 is looking

00:42:38.180 anti-white.

00:42:40.020 It's just

00:42:40.540 a statement

00:42:40.960 you can

00:42:41.320 say now.

00:42:42.560 You're

00:42:43.000 welcome.

00:42:45.840 DeSantis

00:42:46.280 is going

00:42:47.240 down a

00:42:47.600 little bit

00:42:47.940 in the

00:42:48.280 support,

00:42:49.380 which is

00:42:50.100 no big

00:42:50.480 surprise,

00:42:50.980 is it?

00:42:52.160 So,

00:42:52.460 we're

00:42:52.560 expecting him

00:42:53.200 to announce,

00:42:54.200 but Trump

00:42:55.140 is gaining

00:42:55.900 on him

00:42:56.420 54%

00:42:58.040 GOP

00:42:58.980 support

00:42:59.360 compared

00:42:59.700 to 28.

00:43:01.000 So,

00:43:01.360 that,

00:43:01.760 or actually,

00:43:02.440 it's just

00:43:02.800 26 now.

00:43:03.640 Does that

00:43:06.260 surprise you?

00:43:07.480 It doesn't

00:43:07.960 surprise me,

00:43:09.460 because a

00:43:10.940 lot of

00:43:11.220 people who

00:43:11.740 are not

00:43:13.140 even pro-Trump

00:43:14.060 think that

00:43:15.320 maybe DeSantis

00:43:16.080 should have

00:43:16.740 supported the

00:43:18.180 rule of law.

00:43:19.600 He doesn't

00:43:20.380 have to

00:43:20.680 support Trump.

00:43:22.220 He just

00:43:22.560 has to

00:43:22.880 support the

00:43:23.380 rule of law.

00:43:24.020 The trolls

00:43:28.720 on YouTube

00:43:29.580 are so weak

00:43:30.300 today.

00:43:32.560 Could you

00:43:32.860 go,

00:43:33.700 the weak

00:43:34.720 trolls,

00:43:35.140 could you

00:43:35.380 go find

00:43:35.820 somebody to

00:43:36.340 help you?

00:43:37.640 Maybe help

00:43:38.180 you with your

00:43:38.580 trolling,

00:43:39.020 because it's

00:43:39.800 a little bit

00:43:41.080 pathetic today.

00:43:42.940 I'm seeing

00:43:43.560 like a quality

00:43:44.380 of troll

00:43:44.940 at one

00:43:46.000 or two.

00:43:47.400 I've seen

00:43:48.120 trolling that's

00:43:48.800 like an eight

00:43:49.360 or a nine.

00:43:50.580 Like,

00:43:50.820 I know it

00:43:51.280 can be

00:43:51.580 done.

00:43:52.600 And I

00:43:53.040 demand a

00:43:53.940 higher quality

00:43:54.640 of trolling.

00:43:55.960 See,

00:43:56.460 Ruby is

00:43:56.920 just yelling

00:43:57.420 claw atoms

00:43:58.440 in all

00:43:58.780 capitals,

00:43:59.720 because Ruby

00:44:00.320 was fooled

00:44:00.840 by the

00:44:01.240 4chan hoax

00:44:02.040 that reversed

00:44:02.760 all of my

00:44:03.500 opinions.

00:44:05.460 So Ruby,

00:44:06.380 I'm sorry

00:44:06.940 they did

00:44:07.340 this to you.

00:44:08.780 And in this

00:44:09.320 case, I think

00:44:10.120 probably right

00:44:10.900 leaning people

00:44:11.440 did it to you,

00:44:11.960 and I'm sorry

00:44:12.380 about that.

00:44:13.580 I'm sorry

00:44:14.180 you were

00:44:14.500 victimized

00:44:15.180 by 4chan

00:44:17.720 and Reddit

00:44:18.260 maybe.

00:44:20.180 Ben

00:44:20.480 Garrison,

00:44:20.980 the worst

00:44:21.280 cartoonist

00:44:21.820 in the

00:44:22.060 world.

00:44:25.340 Yeah,

00:44:26.140 yeah,

00:44:26.500 please see

00:44:27.120 if you

00:44:27.300 could raise

00:44:27.840 your trolling

00:44:29.300 performance

00:44:30.640 just a little

00:44:31.140 bit.

00:44:32.020 All right,

00:44:32.400 good.

00:44:34.100 Had to be

00:44:34.820 said.

00:44:37.280 Yeah,

00:44:37.800 do you,

00:44:38.300 how many of

00:44:38.780 you would

00:44:39.040 agree with

00:44:39.420 the statement

00:44:39.840 that DeSantis

00:44:41.520 blew an

00:44:43.240 easy call

00:44:43.900 this week?

00:44:45.060 That it

00:44:45.340 was sort

00:44:45.780 of an

00:44:46.080 easy call

00:44:46.960 to support

00:44:48.160 the rule

00:44:48.700 of law,

00:44:49.160 as opposed

00:44:50.440 to the

00:44:50.840 rule of

00:44:51.220 political

00:44:51.600 prosecutions.

00:44:52.960 You know,

00:44:53.220 if you're

00:44:54.360 going to

00:44:54.640 represent

00:44:55.320 Republicans,

00:44:56.720 you've got

00:44:57.820 to speak

00:44:58.200 out against

00:44:58.940 political

00:44:59.520 prosecutions.

00:45:01.040 That's not

00:45:01.760 optional.

00:45:03.000 That is

00:45:03.660 not optional.

00:45:04.880 Because you

00:45:05.340 know what it

00:45:05.660 feels like

00:45:06.180 when he's

00:45:06.620 not supporting

00:45:07.180 Trump?

00:45:08.460 It feels

00:45:09.060 like he's

00:45:09.380 not supporting

00:45:09.920 his supporters

00:45:10.480 either.

00:45:11.360 And you

00:45:11.660 can't win

00:45:12.040 that way.

00:45:13.940 Yeah.

00:45:14.720 That feels

00:45:15.420 a little

00:45:15.680 personal.

00:45:17.580 Let me put

00:45:18.260 it a

00:45:18.460 different

00:45:18.620 way.

00:45:19.940 DeSantis

00:45:20.260 not supporting

00:45:21.300 Trump in

00:45:22.280 this easy,

00:45:23.100 easy call.

00:45:24.620 All you

00:45:25.020 have to

00:45:25.260 do is

00:45:25.540 say,

00:45:25.940 I don't

00:45:26.260 agree with

00:45:26.740 political

00:45:27.320 prosecutions,

00:45:28.420 I don't

00:45:28.900 think this

00:45:29.240 should go

00:45:29.540 forward.

00:45:30.300 Easiest

00:45:30.740 thing anybody

00:45:31.220 could say.

00:45:31.980 That feels

00:45:32.480 personal.

00:45:34.340 I feel

00:45:35.040 that personally.

00:45:36.920 Does anybody

00:45:37.580 else feel

00:45:37.960 it personally?

00:45:38.620 It doesn't

00:45:39.100 feel as

00:45:39.480 political,

00:45:39.880 it just

00:45:40.100 feels

00:45:40.280 personal.

00:45:42.060 Because I

00:45:42.660 feel that he

00:45:43.160 wouldn't support

00:45:43.740 me in that

00:45:44.160 situation either.

00:45:45.520 Do you

00:45:45.800 think I could

00:45:46.320 ever be

00:45:46.760 prosecuted on a

00:45:47.700 political

00:45:48.080 prosecution?

00:45:49.200 Of course.

00:45:51.740 Oh,

00:45:51.940 somebody says

00:45:52.420 he did.

00:45:55.000 Has he

00:45:55.680 improved on

00:45:56.720 his messaging

00:45:57.340 on that?

00:46:00.020 If he has,

00:46:00.860 I'll give him

00:46:01.260 credit for it,

00:46:01.940 but it would

00:46:02.400 still be a

00:46:03.380 little bit

00:46:04.020 too late.

00:46:05.180 Yeah.

00:46:05.780 I don't know.

00:46:06.280 I think he

00:46:06.760 didn't read the

00:46:07.340 room right there

00:46:08.020 at all.

00:46:09.520 Here's an

00:46:10.080 interesting update

00:46:10.780 on AI,

00:46:11.600 which I think

00:46:12.960 is playing into

00:46:13.860 my prediction

00:46:14.760 that AI will

00:46:15.560 become illegal.

00:46:16.300 Except in

00:46:18.720 limited cases.

00:46:20.260 So here's my

00:46:20.780 prediction.

00:46:21.540 AI will not

00:46:22.220 take over the

00:46:22.840 world because

00:46:24.340 we'll make it

00:46:25.040 illegal in so

00:46:26.160 many places

00:46:26.920 that it will

00:46:28.600 be hard to

00:46:29.120 use it in

00:46:29.620 any effective

00:46:30.640 way.

00:46:32.400 All right,

00:46:33.000 here's the

00:46:33.340 first hint

00:46:34.160 of this.

00:46:35.240 Apparently

00:46:35.720 employees are

00:46:36.520 already massively

00:46:37.340 using it to

00:46:38.040 do their

00:46:38.360 work.

00:46:40.540 And employers

00:46:41.420 don't like it.

00:46:42.920 So here's what

00:46:43.480 employees are

00:46:44.320 doing.

00:46:45.480 They're using

00:46:46.260 it to respond

00:46:47.140 to emails.

00:46:48.560 They're using

00:46:49.280 the free

00:46:50.000 public AI.

00:46:52.160 So I'm sure

00:46:53.220 they check it,

00:46:54.640 but they're

00:46:54.980 making sure

00:46:55.420 that their

00:46:55.740 email has

00:46:56.380 perfect wording

00:46:57.360 and says

00:46:58.280 what they want.

00:46:59.140 So they're

00:46:59.580 using it to

00:47:00.140 write their

00:47:00.480 emails based

00:47:01.560 on their

00:47:02.040 instructions.

00:47:03.340 They're using

00:47:04.000 it to write

00:47:04.480 code or even

00:47:06.800 to suggest a

00:47:07.980 way to write

00:47:08.560 code.

00:47:09.060 It doesn't

00:47:09.680 necessarily

00:47:10.160 write it for

00:47:10.740 them, but in

00:47:11.740 some cases it

00:47:12.460 can just say

00:47:12.980 what the approach

00:47:13.700 would be.

00:47:14.640 It saves a

00:47:15.160 whole bunch

00:47:15.480 of time.

00:47:16.260 It's just

00:47:16.600 like a super

00:47:17.400 Google basically.

00:47:19.040 But employers

00:47:19.740 are saying,

00:47:20.420 oh, you

00:47:21.540 know, we

00:47:21.840 don't like

00:47:22.460 this.

00:47:22.780 They're

00:47:22.860 uncomfortable

00:47:23.200 with it.

00:47:24.100 But here's

00:47:24.700 a statistic

00:47:27.120 that I

00:47:29.400 don't believe.

00:47:30.560 This couldn't

00:47:31.160 possibly be

00:47:31.900 true, could

00:47:32.580 it?

00:47:34.140 Almost 70%

00:47:35.520 of employees

00:47:36.740 surveyed are

00:47:38.080 using AI

00:47:38.780 without telling

00:47:39.440 their boss.

00:47:40.000 Do you

00:47:41.000 believe that

00:47:41.400 70%?

00:47:42.500 This must

00:47:42.900 be office

00:47:43.540 workers, of

00:47:44.160 course, but

00:47:45.080 people who

00:47:45.780 work inside,

00:47:47.120 you think 70%

00:47:48.160 of them are

00:47:48.600 using AI

00:47:49.180 already?

00:47:49.640 That's

00:47:49.860 ridiculous.

00:47:50.580 That's not

00:47:50.920 even slightly

00:47:51.440 possible.

00:47:54.600 Yeah, and

00:47:55.060 that's a

00:47:55.320 ridiculous number.

00:47:57.360 Because if

00:47:58.040 you ask the

00:47:58.660 average employee

00:47:59.920 about AI,

00:48:00.760 they would

00:48:00.960 say, I

00:48:02.220 don't even

00:48:02.640 know where

00:48:02.920 I would

00:48:03.240 look for

00:48:03.620 it.

00:48:04.680 There's no

00:48:05.260 way it's

00:48:05.580 70%.

00:48:06.280 Right?

00:48:08.280 I mean, I'm

00:48:08.680 right, right?

00:48:09.800 Well, 70%

00:48:10.760 of indoor

00:48:12.120 office worker

00:48:13.000 types.

00:48:14.340 There's no

00:48:14.980 way.

00:48:16.000 Nothing 70%.

00:48:17.280 Well, that's

00:48:19.080 an exaggeration.

00:48:21.900 However, this

00:48:23.020 is, and then

00:48:25.020 lawyers are

00:48:25.720 saying don't

00:48:26.240 use it to

00:48:27.120 give a legal

00:48:28.780 opinion to a

00:48:29.600 client.

00:48:30.880 Don't ever

00:48:31.720 let AI

00:48:32.480 write the

00:48:33.400 opinion that

00:48:35.320 you're going

00:48:35.620 to give

00:48:35.860 directly to a

00:48:36.600 client.

00:48:36.960 Yeah, that

00:48:38.520 feels like

00:48:39.280 really

00:48:39.600 uncomfortable

00:48:40.180 if you're

00:48:40.720 in the

00:48:40.880 legal

00:48:41.080 business.

00:48:41.800 Because there

00:48:42.260 are two

00:48:42.500 problems.

00:48:43.320 Number one,

00:48:44.780 it might be

00:48:45.220 wrong if you

00:48:45.880 don't check

00:48:46.320 it.

00:48:46.560 Number two,

00:48:47.960 it might

00:48:48.460 make your

00:48:48.940 law firm

00:48:49.380 look

00:48:49.600 unnecessary

00:48:50.140 because the

00:48:51.740 client could

00:48:52.220 have Googled

00:48:52.660 that or

00:48:53.060 asked GPT

00:48:54.460 the same

00:48:54.800 thing.

00:48:55.820 I think

00:48:56.440 that might

00:48:56.800 be the

00:48:57.060 bigger problem

00:48:57.680 that it

00:48:58.300 would make

00:48:58.540 lawyers look

00:48:59.140 unnecessary

00:48:59.620 for easy

00:49:00.380 stuff.

00:49:01.240 Still be

00:49:01.640 necessary for

00:49:02.300 the hard

00:49:02.560 stuff.

00:49:03.540 But it

00:49:03.820 might make

00:49:04.180 them look

00:49:04.440 unnecessary

00:49:04.880 for their

00:49:05.440 bread-and-butter

00:49:06.180 easy stuff.

00:49:08.160 Paperwork

00:49:08.800 pushing.

00:49:09.520 How do

00:49:09.680 you start

00:49:10.420 a...

00:49:11.420 Imagine

00:49:11.920 this.

00:49:13.240 Hey,

00:49:13.500 AI,

00:49:14.200 should I

00:49:15.260 start a

00:49:16.120 C-Corp,

00:49:17.920 an S-Corp,

00:49:18.660 or a

00:49:18.940 limited

00:49:19.200 liability

00:49:19.760 company?

00:49:21.720 That's

00:49:22.400 sort of a

00:49:22.880 typical

00:49:23.220 lawyer or

00:49:24.440 sometimes

00:49:24.820 accountant

00:49:25.300 question.

00:49:26.620 And I'm

00:49:28.120 pretty sure

00:49:28.580 ChatGPT

00:49:29.500 could give

00:49:29.980 you a 0.57

00:49:31.040 total good

00:49:32.040 reason,

00:49:32.360 well-constructed

00:49:35.060 argument for

00:49:35.560 which one

00:49:35.880 you can

00:49:36.160 use.

00:49:36.800 So I

00:49:37.340 got a

00:49:37.580 feeling that

00:49:38.060 there's a

00:49:38.440 whole bunch

00:49:38.880 of the

00:49:39.140 legal

00:49:39.440 profession

00:49:39.900 that's

00:49:40.260 in jeopardy

00:49:40.900 here.

00:49:41.220 Might be

00:49:41.640 one of

00:49:41.860 the first

00:49:42.180 things to

00:49:42.680 take a

00:49:43.660 hit from

00:49:45.600 AI.

00:49:45.880 All right.

00:49:50.240 So I

00:49:51.080 think that

00:49:51.600 AI will be

00:49:55.160 illegal in

00:49:56.980 an increasing

00:49:58.280 number of

00:49:59.000 contexts.

00:49:59.640 it's already

00:50:02.720 illegal to

00:50:04.120 create memes

00:50:04.960 that look

00:50:05.380 real.

00:50:06.420 So social

00:50:06.900 media has

00:50:07.340 already said,

00:50:08.520 okay, you

00:50:09.120 can't make

00:50:09.680 this meme

00:50:10.440 of a real

00:50:11.100 person unless

00:50:12.420 it's clearly

00:50:13.140 labeled parody

00:50:13.960 or something.

00:50:15.020 So that's

00:50:15.560 already illegal.

00:50:17.280 And lawyers

00:50:18.340 are saying

00:50:18.880 you can't

00:50:19.540 use it for

00:50:19.960 a client,

00:50:20.600 and bosses

00:50:20.980 are saying

00:50:21.440 you can't

00:50:21.880 use it for

00:50:22.320 work.

00:50:23.340 I think

00:50:23.760 little by

00:50:24.340 little,

00:50:25.800 we will

00:50:26.400 realize that

00:50:27.260 the operating

00:50:27.940 system of

00:50:30.320 civilization

00:50:30.960 is lying

00:50:33.100 and stupidity. 0.85

00:50:35.180 And that

00:50:35.520 if you took

00:50:35.920 the lying

00:50:36.520 and stupidity 0.77

00:50:37.260 out of our

00:50:37.660 system,

00:50:38.100 it would

00:50:38.200 crumble.

00:50:39.720 It's all

00:50:40.340 based on

00:50:40.820 optimism and

00:50:41.580 bullshit.

00:50:42.880 And the

00:50:43.680 AI doesn't

00:50:44.320 know how to

00:50:44.740 do optimism

00:50:45.340 and bullshit. 0.79

00:50:47.020 So I

00:50:47.540 think the

00:50:47.880 humans will

00:50:49.320 make a

00:50:49.940 whole

00:50:50.700 constellation

00:50:51.860 of individual

00:50:52.820 small decisions

00:50:54.020 that collectively

00:50:55.500 will make

00:50:56.060 AI so

00:50:57.220 neutered that

00:50:58.520 you either

00:50:58.840 don't believe

00:50:59.440 it or you

00:51:00.680 feel bad about

00:51:01.320 using it or

00:51:01.980 it's just

00:51:02.280 illegal or

00:51:03.440 against the

00:51:03.940 guidelines of

00:51:04.500 where you

00:51:04.700 work.

00:51:05.580 So little by

00:51:06.160 little,

00:51:06.500 I think humans

00:51:07.100 will make it

00:51:07.920 only useful as

00:51:10.660 maybe an

00:51:11.580 advanced Google

00:51:12.480 search.

00:51:14.040 And we might

00:51:14.880 be comfortable

00:51:15.360 with that,

00:51:16.380 but we're not

00:51:16.860 going to let it

00:51:17.260 do stuff.

00:51:18.600 We're not

00:51:18.960 going to give

00:51:19.240 it authority.

00:51:20.560 We're not

00:51:20.980 going to let

00:51:21.300 it even help

00:51:22.540 us with our

00:51:23.080 arguments.

00:51:24.200 And the last

00:51:24.840 thing you'll let

00:51:25.540 it do is let

00:51:26.260 it decide on

00:51:27.060 a policy

00:51:27.580 decision.

00:51:28.700 It will

00:51:29.000 probably be

00:51:29.660 illegal.

00:51:30.360 Here's a

00:51:30.840 prediction.

00:51:31.860 Specific

00:51:32.420 prediction.

00:51:33.100 You ready?

00:51:34.260 Specific

00:51:34.820 prediction.

00:51:36.220 It will be

00:51:37.220 illegal to

00:51:38.880 publish an

00:51:39.560 AI opinion

00:51:40.460 on a major

00:51:41.280 policy decision

00:51:42.280 in the future

00:51:43.920 or possibly

00:51:46.220 just banned

00:51:47.720 by the news

00:51:48.360 industry.

00:51:49.400 So the news

00:51:50.020 industry just

00:51:50.700 might say,

00:51:51.420 we'll never

00:51:51.800 give you an

00:51:52.580 AI opinion

00:51:53.280 because the

00:51:56.180 AI opinion

00:51:56.840 wouldn't have

00:51:57.280 the spin

00:51:57.780 that the

00:51:58.320 news wants

00:51:59.040 to put on

00:51:59.500 it.

00:52:00.120 So if they

00:52:00.760 can't put

00:52:01.060 the spin

00:52:01.420 on it,

00:52:01.860 they're going

00:52:02.080 to ban

00:52:02.900 it because

00:52:04.200 it will

00:52:04.400 make their

00:52:04.740 own news

00:52:05.140 look spun.

00:52:06.660 If you

00:52:07.160 ever had

00:52:07.660 a non-spun

00:52:08.860 news from

00:52:09.780 an AI,

00:52:12.260 everybody's

00:52:13.000 over-spun

00:52:14.120 biased news

00:52:14.980 would look

00:52:15.360 ridiculous and

00:52:16.780 you would

00:52:17.020 just stop

00:52:17.420 looking at

00:52:17.860 it immediately.

00:52:18.400 you'd just

00:52:19.420 say, well,

00:52:20.220 I can just

00:52:21.120 ask the

00:52:22.500 AI for

00:52:23.080 the news

00:52:23.600 and it

00:52:24.720 will just

00:52:25.020 tell me

00:52:25.340 the news

00:52:25.800 without a

00:52:26.300 spin.

00:52:27.320 Now at

00:52:27.860 the moment

00:52:28.360 there's the

00:52:29.080 bigger problem.

00:52:30.080 It looks

00:52:30.440 like AI

00:52:31.040 is programmed

00:52:31.600 to give

00:52:32.020 you only

00:52:32.440 spin.

00:52:33.440 It only

00:52:34.040 gives you

00:52:34.340 a Democrat

00:52:34.780 view of

00:52:35.340 the world.

00:52:36.160 So that

00:52:36.840 might be

00:52:37.140 the reason

00:52:37.480 to ban

00:52:37.860 it.

00:52:38.880 It could

00:52:39.200 get banned

00:52:39.640 because it's

00:52:40.220 just a

00:52:40.580 Democrat

00:52:40.860 opinion.

00:52:41.920 And then

00:52:42.220 people will

00:52:42.920 say, well,

00:52:43.360 I can get

00:52:43.820 that without

00:52:44.260 AI.

00:52:45.640 So there

00:52:46.240 are a whole

00:52:46.680 bunch of

00:52:47.100 reasons I

00:52:47.620 think AI

00:52:48.060 will be

00:52:48.500 banned in

00:52:49.220 a whole

00:52:49.540 bunch of

00:52:49.940 different

00:52:50.220 contexts until

00:52:51.540 there's not

00:52:51.980 much left.

00:52:52.960 I think

00:52:53.560 we'll pick

00:52:54.000 at it until

00:52:54.520 it's just

00:52:54.860 bones.

00:52:57.260 There's your

00:52:57.900 contrarian

00:52:58.620 opinion for

00:52:59.500 the day.

00:53:02.520 Well,

00:53:03.060 we're seeing

00:53:03.420 some news

00:53:04.140 that the

00:53:04.640 Wagner Group,

00:53:06.060 which is

00:53:06.500 doing the

00:53:06.780 heavy fighting

00:53:07.340 over there

00:53:07.740 in Ukraine.

00:53:10.400 So the

00:53:11.080 news report

00:53:11.640 says,

00:53:13.060 and I

00:53:13.480 couch all

00:53:14.280 of this

00:53:14.780 with nobody

00:53:16.540 believes the

00:53:17.280 news coming

00:53:18.040 out of

00:53:18.340 Ukraine,

00:53:19.460 because it's

00:53:19.900 always spun

00:53:20.560 pro-Ukrainian

00:53:21.720 or pro-Russian,

00:53:22.920 but it's

00:53:23.180 never objective.

00:53:24.620 So I'll

00:53:25.280 just tell you

00:53:26.020 what the

00:53:26.300 news is,

00:53:27.440 and then

00:53:27.820 in your

00:53:28.160 mind say,

00:53:28.840 well,

00:53:29.080 maybe,

00:53:29.900 it might

00:53:30.520 be true,

00:53:31.320 but it

00:53:31.620 might not

00:53:32.000 be.

00:53:32.800 Just keep

00:53:33.420 might not

00:53:34.120 be going

00:53:34.620 into your

00:53:34.940 brain when

00:53:35.380 I read

00:53:35.640 this.

00:53:37.000 So Ukraine's 0.93

00:53:38.040 most senior

00:53:38.920 ground forces,

00:53:39.800 basically,

00:53:40.320 they're saying

00:53:40.900 that the

00:53:41.380 Wagner forces

00:53:42.040 are being

00:53:42.540 so degraded

00:53:44.880 in the

00:53:45.800 current

00:53:46.060 fighting that

00:53:47.200 the Ukrainians

00:53:48.000 will be able

00:53:48.460 to mount

00:53:48.860 a counter

00:53:49.600 offensive,

00:53:51.100 and their

00:53:52.580 odds of

00:53:53.020 success are

00:53:53.560 pretty high

00:53:54.080 because there

00:53:55.120 won't be much

00:53:55.660 left of the

00:53:56.540 Russian Wagner

00:53:57.380 forces by the

00:53:58.360 time they do

00:53:58.840 it.

00:53:59.760 Now, do you

00:54:00.180 believe that?

00:54:02.240 Or does that

00:54:02.760 sound exactly

00:54:03.760 like Ukrainian 0.99

00:54:04.640 propaganda?

00:54:05.180 It sounds

00:54:08.400 exactly like

00:54:09.600 Ukrainian

00:54:10.280 propaganda,

00:54:11.480 but could

00:54:12.540 also be

00:54:13.040 true.

00:54:14.320 It's just

00:54:14.940 there's no

00:54:15.340 reason to

00:54:15.760 believe it

00:54:16.260 because whether

00:54:18.340 it were true

00:54:18.940 or not true,

00:54:21.960 Anthony,

00:54:23.720 do better.

00:54:26.260 I asked

00:54:26.840 for the

00:54:28.380 trolls to

00:54:28.880 up their

00:54:29.180 game,

00:54:29.980 and I got

00:54:30.300 a paragraph

00:54:30.820 in all caps

00:54:31.760 accusing me of

00:54:33.100 doubting the

00:54:33.520 Holocaust. 0.77

00:54:35.180 That's not

00:54:35.620 better.

00:54:37.400 That's actually,

00:54:38.340 I think you

00:54:38.720 took a step

00:54:39.140 backwards,

00:54:40.500 Anthony.

00:54:41.620 Try a little

00:54:42.240 better than

00:54:42.600 that.

00:54:43.540 Could you go

00:54:44.320 talk to the

00:54:44.860 other trolls?

00:54:45.560 Are they on

00:54:45.980 vacation today?

00:54:47.520 Did the good

00:54:48.220 trolls all take

00:54:48.860 the day off?

00:54:50.420 Come on,

00:54:51.000 up your game,

00:54:51.640 Anthony.

00:54:52.480 You can do

00:54:53.240 it.

00:54:54.380 I trust you.

00:54:55.900 I trust you.

00:54:58.040 I believe in

00:54:58.880 you, Anthony.

00:54:59.800 I believe in

00:55:00.340 you.

00:55:01.900 Well, Jack

00:55:03.380 Dorsey is

00:55:04.040 getting some

00:55:04.700 heat today

00:55:05.400 because his

00:55:06.020 other company

00:55:07.660 that he is

00:55:08.800 a co-founder

00:55:09.340 in, Block,

00:55:10.600 and has the

00:55:11.320 cash app.

00:55:12.900 So the

00:55:13.260 cash app

00:55:13.880 lets you to

00:55:14.660 send cash

00:55:15.540 from one

00:55:15.920 person to

00:55:16.340 another

00:55:16.560 without a

00:55:17.040 bank.

00:55:18.000 So you

00:55:18.420 don't need

00:55:18.700 a bank

00:55:19.040 in the

00:55:19.300 process.

00:55:19.820 It's just

00:55:20.220 app to

00:55:21.580 app,

00:55:22.120 and then I

00:55:22.420 guess you

00:55:22.660 can turn

00:55:22.980 it into

00:55:23.300 cash.

00:55:25.680 But the

00:55:26.700 shares of

00:55:27.400 Block

00:55:28.460 plunged 18%.

00:55:29.920 I don't know,

00:55:31.220 this was as

00:55:31.900 a few

00:55:32.320 hours ago,

00:55:33.560 because there's

00:55:35.060 a short

00:55:35.420 seller called

00:55:36.600 the Hindenburg

00:55:37.400 Research,

00:55:38.120 which is a

00:55:38.580 great name

00:55:39.080 for a

00:55:39.760 short

00:55:40.000 seller.

00:55:40.880 Now, if you

00:55:41.260 don't follow

00:55:42.000 finance, a

00:55:42.940 short seller is

00:55:44.160 somebody who's

00:55:44.760 making a bet

00:55:45.540 that a stock

00:55:46.340 will go down,

00:55:47.840 and usually a

00:55:48.680 bet that it

00:55:49.060 will go down

00:55:49.600 a lot and

00:55:51.080 fairly soon.

00:55:53.160 So they only

00:55:54.140 make their

00:55:54.600 money with

00:55:55.480 stocks that

00:55:56.040 go down.

00:55:57.400 So can

00:55:58.220 you believe

00:55:58.840 a short

00:55:59.440 seller when

00:56:00.520 they say

00:56:00.940 there's a

00:56:01.340 problem with

00:56:01.880 the company?

00:56:02.620 Is that

00:56:02.880 credible?

00:56:04.700 Well, it's

00:56:05.720 true that they

00:56:06.220 put their

00:56:06.560 money on it.

00:56:07.720 So if you

00:56:08.180 said, well,

00:56:08.660 they put their

00:56:09.100 money where

00:56:09.440 their mouth 0.77

00:56:09.800 is, you'd

00:56:10.200 say yes.

00:56:10.880 But the

00:56:11.220 problem is,

00:56:12.320 the news is

00:56:13.140 what makes

00:56:13.540 the stock

00:56:14.000 go down.

00:56:15.420 So somebody

00:56:15.960 who makes

00:56:16.380 money if

00:56:16.980 stock goes

00:56:17.540 down, creates

00:56:19.040 news that

00:56:19.660 says the

00:56:20.060 stock should

00:56:20.580 go down, and

00:56:21.820 then people

00:56:22.200 read the

00:56:22.640 news and

00:56:23.060 they go,

00:56:23.440 well, I

00:56:23.800 don't know

00:56:24.020 if it's

00:56:24.260 true or

00:56:24.580 not, but

00:56:24.940 it sounds

00:56:25.260 scary, so

00:56:26.280 I'd better

00:56:26.560 get out

00:56:26.880 of this

00:56:27.100 stock just

00:56:27.640 in case.

00:56:28.800 And then

00:56:29.180 the company

00:56:29.940 that said

00:56:30.320 bad things

00:56:30.900 about it

00:56:31.360 makes money.

00:56:33.440 This story

00:56:34.300 is based

00:56:35.260 on the

00:56:35.660 lowest level

00:56:36.700 of credibility.

00:56:38.420 You can't

00:56:39.180 get a lower

00:56:39.700 level of

00:56:40.240 credibility

00:56:40.660 than, if

00:56:41.740 you believe

00:56:42.240 my story,

00:56:42.980 I'll make

00:56:43.360 money.

00:56:44.220 If you

00:56:44.780 don't believe

00:56:45.260 my story,

00:56:45.880 I'll lose

00:56:46.420 money.

00:56:47.420 You can't

00:56:48.380 be less

00:56:48.920 credible than

00:56:49.600 that.

00:56:50.280 It's

00:56:50.560 impossible.

00:56:52.120 The next

00:56:52.900 less credible

00:56:53.560 is a

00:56:55.100 secret source

00:56:55.840 told me

00:56:56.240 it was

00:56:56.460 true in

00:56:57.240 the meeting

00:56:57.600 and nobody

00:56:58.000 else has

00:56:58.380 another

00:56:58.620 source.

00:56:59.880 That's

00:57:00.340 pretty bad.

00:57:01.800 But the

00:57:02.960 secret source

00:57:03.640 at least

00:57:04.080 isn't directly

00:57:05.020 getting money

00:57:05.740 right now.

00:57:08.240 It's as

00:57:09.000 terrible as

00:57:09.980 a single

00:57:10.500 anonymous

00:57:11.000 source is.

00:57:11.940 Completely

00:57:12.500 non-believable.

00:57:14.440 The person

00:57:14.940 who's making

00:57:15.440 money, if you

00:57:16.400 believe their

00:57:16.860 story, that's

00:57:18.420 by far the

00:57:19.480 lowest credibility.

00:57:20.320 But it

00:57:22.180 doesn't mean

00:57:22.580 it's false.

00:57:23.880 It doesn't

00:57:24.300 mean it's

00:57:24.580 not true.

00:57:26.340 It doesn't

00:57:26.740 mean that.

00:57:27.480 Because if

00:57:27.840 they've been

00:57:28.140 in business

00:57:29.420 for a while

00:57:29.920 and they

00:57:30.140 have a

00:57:30.340 track record

00:57:30.980 of not

00:57:31.960 just making

00:57:32.640 things go

00:57:33.180 down, but

00:57:34.400 finding in

00:57:35.820 advance which

00:57:36.440 ones go

00:57:36.820 down.

00:57:37.340 Now, here's

00:57:37.780 their claim,

00:57:39.080 which is

00:57:39.760 pretty outrageous.

00:57:41.480 They said

00:57:42.100 they did a

00:57:42.580 two-year

00:57:42.920 investigation and

00:57:44.900 concluded that

00:57:46.520 Block, the 0.56

00:57:48.520 parent company,

00:57:49.920 has systematically

00:57:50.660 taken advantage

00:57:51.600 of the

00:57:52.100 demographics it

00:57:53.020 claims to be

00:57:53.620 helping.

00:57:54.720 So it would

00:57:55.360 claim to be

00:57:55.860 helping people

00:57:56.480 who don't

00:57:57.160 have a

00:57:57.500 banking

00:57:57.780 relationship,

00:57:58.760 so it would

00:57:59.000 be lower

00:57:59.440 income people.

00:58:01.020 And then the

00:58:01.380 short seller

00:58:01.800 said it

00:58:05.440 thrives on

00:58:06.300 serving the

00:58:06.740 unbanked.

00:58:07.460 Okay, that's

00:58:07.800 what I said.

00:58:08.800 And it

00:58:09.240 alleged that

00:58:10.140 the unbanked

00:58:13.040 are massively

00:58:13.840 using it for

00:58:14.620 fraud.

00:58:17.100 And the

00:58:17.740 allegation is

00:58:18.360 because they

00:58:18.800 can.

00:58:21.320 So in

00:58:21.840 other words,

00:58:22.300 there's a

00:58:22.520 huge percentage

00:58:23.160 according to

00:58:23.780 the short

00:58:24.120 seller of

00:58:25.000 the people

00:58:25.300 who use

00:58:25.720 the app

00:58:26.140 who are

00:58:26.580 criminals and

00:58:27.880 fraudsters.

00:58:28.920 So that the

00:58:29.940 total number of

00:58:30.980 users is

00:58:32.020 inflated, not

00:58:33.700 by a little

00:58:34.240 bit, but by

00:58:35.660 a lot, because

00:58:37.200 there are

00:58:37.540 fraudsters who

00:58:38.380 might sign up

00:58:38.980 with two

00:58:39.320 different names

00:58:40.140 and a number

00:58:40.900 of things you

00:58:41.360 can do.

00:58:42.380 So I would

00:58:46.060 say two

00:58:46.560 things are

00:58:46.940 probably true.

00:58:48.360 There's

00:58:48.880 probably too

00:58:49.580 much fraud

00:58:50.080 on the

00:58:50.400 app, but

00:58:53.300 the claim of

00:58:54.160 a short

00:58:54.520 seller is

00:58:54.980 not credible.

00:58:56.980 Like, every

00:58:57.520 app has too

00:58:58.120 much fraud.

00:58:59.600 Every app.

00:59:00.580 Every app has

00:59:01.280 too much

00:59:01.580 fraud.

00:59:02.560 So probably

00:59:03.540 they do

00:59:03.940 too.

00:59:04.920 I mean, that

00:59:05.340 would be the

00:59:05.860 least surprising

00:59:06.880 thing in the

00:59:07.380 world, is if a

00:59:08.220 money-related

00:59:08.980 app had no

00:59:10.820 bad people

00:59:11.420 involved.

00:59:11.960 Of course

00:59:12.280 there are.

00:59:13.520 But I

00:59:14.640 would say be

00:59:15.140 cautious of

00:59:15.800 this story.

00:59:17.080 Just be a

00:59:17.440 little cautious.

00:59:18.460 Because the

00:59:18.880 source is the

00:59:19.540 worst source you

00:59:20.540 could possibly

00:59:21.060 have.

00:59:22.040 Just know

00:59:22.500 that.

00:59:25.400 But it

00:59:27.320 doesn't mean

00:59:27.700 it's not

00:59:28.180 true.

00:59:28.660 It just

00:59:28.920 means that I

00:59:29.980 wouldn't believe

00:59:30.380 it based on

00:59:30.800 the source.

00:59:31.180 all right.

00:59:35.440 Ladies and 0.98

00:59:36.000 gentlemen, this

00:59:37.940 brings me to

00:59:38.700 the closing

00:59:40.600 portion for

00:59:41.340 the YouTube

00:59:41.760 people.

00:59:45.140 So I'd

00:59:45.880 like the

00:59:46.980 trolls on

00:59:47.960 YouTube, if

00:59:49.140 you could make

00:59:49.920 one final push.

00:59:51.700 I want to see

00:59:52.140 if you're up

00:59:52.540 to it.

00:59:53.740 Some good,

00:59:54.900 good criticisms.

00:59:57.080 Come on.

00:59:58.020 Bring me the

00:59:58.440 good stuff.

00:59:58.900 In all

01:00:01.360 caps, I

01:00:01.900 prefer all

01:00:02.460 caps.

01:00:03.680 Because when

01:00:04.060 you use all

01:00:04.500 caps, it's

01:00:05.060 easier to

01:00:05.560 know who

01:00:05.920 to, there

01:00:06.900 we go.

01:00:09.380 Okay, now

01:00:10.080 they're just

01:00:10.460 shouting out

01:00:11.220 things that

01:00:12.000 are out of

01:00:12.440 context.

01:00:13.140 That's a

01:00:13.460 good start.

01:00:14.000 That's like a

01:00:14.380 warm-up.

01:00:16.180 You can't

01:00:16.920 see this over

01:00:17.540 on locals, but

01:00:18.620 it's like they're

01:00:19.060 stretching.

01:00:20.960 Now they're

01:00:21.580 just yelling

01:00:22.060 certain words

01:00:23.280 in caps.

01:00:25.000 The

01:00:25.200 clankers are

01:00:25.840 here.

01:00:27.060 Somebody's

01:00:27.420 yelling Anthony

01:00:28.060 Super Troll.

01:00:32.700 Okay.

01:00:34.180 Anything?

01:00:35.060 No.

01:00:35.540 It looks

01:00:35.920 like the

01:00:38.780 trolls have

01:00:39.440 tapped

01:00:39.880 down.

01:00:41.300 Aw.

01:00:43.240 Oh, here

01:00:43.880 we go.

01:00:44.360 One in all

01:00:44.940 caps.

01:00:47.380 This is

01:00:48.040 their best

01:00:48.500 work from

01:00:49.560 C. Glenn.

01:00:50.440 I'll read

01:00:50.860 it in all

01:00:51.280 caps, like

01:00:51.880 shouting,

01:00:52.480 I think

01:00:53.520 your subscriber

01:00:54.440 base is

01:00:55.080 dropping.

01:00:55.500 Okay.

01:00:58.060 That was

01:00:59.060 their best

01:00:59.400 one.

01:01:01.700 I have

01:01:02.340 bad news

01:01:02.800 for you.

01:01:04.580 My subscriber

01:01:05.320 base is

01:01:06.240 surging.

01:01:07.560 That would

01:01:08.220 be the

01:01:08.500 opposite of

01:01:09.140 declining.

01:01:10.620 It's

01:01:11.000 surging.

01:01:14.760 Oh, here's

01:01:15.120 one.

01:01:15.580 Your ex-wife.

01:01:17.800 Now I can't

01:01:18.740 tell the

01:01:19.040 difference between

01:01:19.700 people who are

01:01:20.380 clowning and

01:01:21.240 pretending to be

01:01:21.980 bad trolls and

01:01:23.400 people who are

01:01:23.800 actually trolls.

01:01:24.740 Somebody just

01:01:25.340 yelled in all

01:01:25.900 caps,

01:01:26.500 your ex-wife.

01:01:27.240 And that

01:01:30.000 Larry Elder

01:01:31.300 interview, in

01:01:31.980 all caps.

01:01:34.820 All right.

01:01:35.720 Well, thank you

01:01:36.380 for trying.

01:01:37.600 I appreciate

01:01:38.140 the tiny amount

01:01:41.040 of effort that

01:01:41.740 the trolls put

01:01:42.560 into it.

01:01:43.780 But, hey,

01:01:45.820 at least you

01:01:46.340 did some work

01:01:47.240 today.

01:01:49.160 You love me

01:01:49.920 from Uganda?

01:01:51.180 Well, I love

01:01:51.900 you too.

01:01:53.720 Or Uganda. 0.66

01:01:55.540 Let's call it

01:01:56.260 Uganda.

01:01:57.520 All right.

01:01:58.400 YouTube, I'm

01:01:59.040 going to say

01:01:59.280 bye for now.

01:02:00.180 And I'll talk

01:02:00.860 to the locals

01:02:01.520 people a little

01:02:01.980 bit because

01:02:02.460 they get extra.

01:02:03.780 Bye for now.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - March 23, 2023

Episode 2056 Scott Adams： Bad Week For DeSantis, Alvin Bragg, TikTok, AI. Great Week For Trump

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript