Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2056 Scott Adams： Bad Week For DeSantis, Alvin Bragg, TikTok, AI. Great Week For Trump

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Coffee with Scott Adams.

00:00:06.580 It's the finest thing that's ever happened to you in your whole darn life.

00:00:10.260 Probably. Probably.

00:00:12.060 You know, things might pick up later, but at the moment,

00:00:15.540 this is the best thing that's ever happened to you, and it's getting better.

00:00:18.960 Watch this.

00:00:20.220 All you need is a simultaneous sip to take it up a level.

00:00:22.940 All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass of tank or gel,

00:00:25.940 a sistein, a kinteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:28.880 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:31.580 I like coffee.

00:00:32.940 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine hit of the day.

00:00:36.360 The thing makes everything better.

00:00:37.800 It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.

00:00:40.420 Go.

00:00:44.260 Ah.

00:00:46.000 The best thing that ever happened.

00:00:48.360 Well, there's going to be a theme for today's live stream.

00:00:52.300 The theme is, it seems like everything's going my way.

00:00:57.420 That's the theme.

00:00:58.820 Let's see if I can connect it all together and make that theme work, okay?

00:01:03.040 I'll start with a tweet I just saw before I went live from David Boxenhorn.

00:01:08.300 A good follow on Twitter.

00:01:10.480 David Boxenhorn has good stuff.

00:01:13.840 And he tweets,

00:01:14.720 It's been in the news lately that the age gap between men and women in relationships is increasing.

00:01:21.320 I've seen a lot of speculation about why this is, but not the one that comes to my mind.

00:01:27.200 Women want children at an earlier age than men do.

00:01:30.400 So get serious at an earlier age.

00:01:32.440 Do you think that's why older men and younger women are getting together?

00:01:40.080 Do you think that's the reason?

00:01:43.260 I don't think so.

00:01:44.260 Now, this happens to be one of the few categories I can speak about with some authority.

00:01:50.920 There are a lot of things I talk about that's maybe not my sweet spot.

00:01:55.600 Maybe I'm just sort of speculating about other people.

00:01:57.960 But now and then, there's a topic that I can talk to with great authority.

00:02:05.100 It's not about having kids.

00:02:07.660 It's definitely not that.

00:02:11.080 It's money, of course.

00:02:13.800 You know, financial security would be right up there.

00:02:17.440 But almost equal to it is a mindset difference.

00:02:22.860 There's just a clear mindset difference.

00:02:25.080 And it's not everybody's thing, right?

00:02:27.120 But let me put it this way.

00:02:29.340 As a general statement that does not apply to every person,

00:02:34.000 but as sort of a general statement,

00:02:36.760 I think women look for people who are like their dad,

00:02:42.680 and men look for people who maybe remind them of their mom in some ways.

00:02:47.700 Not necessarily looks, but in terms of personality and stuff.

00:02:51.000 Now, the problem is that younger men remind women of their mother.

00:02:59.280 Am I right?

00:03:00.680 If you're a younger woman, you say,

00:03:02.440 Oh, I just met this guy my age.

00:03:04.460 He reminds me of my mother.

00:03:07.600 He's very woke.

00:03:10.140 He's very empathetic.

00:03:11.480 Very caring.

00:03:12.560 Seems to care about other people a great deal.

00:03:14.520 Uses all the right pronouns.

00:03:15.660 Yeah.

00:03:16.660 Yeah.

00:03:17.520 So if somebody reminds you of your mother and your female,

00:03:21.940 that might not be the most attractive thing.

00:03:24.460 But there would be a lot of young women

00:03:26.940 who think that the men their age just are not exactly manly enough, basically.

00:03:34.420 And so they're looking for older guys who are still a little less woke.

00:03:40.200 So one way I could put it is there's a split preference.

00:03:45.680 Plenty of young women like extra wokeness with their men before they cheat on them.

00:03:51.800 I mean, it's a temporary thing.

00:03:53.780 Obviously, the woke men will all be cheated on.

00:03:56.580 I think that's obvious to everybody.

00:03:58.600 But maybe some portion of women just prefer guys that remind them of their dad.

00:04:04.420 You know, sort of a self-determination mindset, you know, less complaining, that sort of thing.

00:04:11.780 So I think that's what it is.

00:04:12.940 It's a mindset thing.

00:04:14.620 All right.

00:04:15.120 In the news, coffee has been tested and apparently is not as risky for your cardiac health as once thought.

00:04:24.680 So once again, things are going my way.

00:04:29.020 That's right.

00:04:29.480 Coffee is associated with a longer life and taking more steps when you're alive and getting more done and being more focused and all that.

00:04:43.520 So coffee, not so bad for you after all, at least for your heart, very specifically.

00:04:49.120 My conversation with Larry Elder, he graciously interviewed me for his Epoch Times site, but you can see it.

00:05:00.380 You can look, either Google it.

00:05:02.140 I think it's now on YouTube.

00:05:03.900 So just Google Larry Elder and Scott Adams and it'll pop right up.

00:05:08.620 Or you can see the link in my Twitter feed today toward the top.

00:05:12.280 So that's going my way.

00:05:16.460 So coffee's going my way.

00:05:19.440 Younger women are like older guys.

00:05:21.660 That's going my way.

00:05:23.640 You know, Larry Elder interview worked out nicely, I thought.

00:05:28.460 All going my way.

00:05:30.460 Here's something that doesn't have anything directly to do with me, but I'm going to weigh in.

00:05:37.480 Apparently there's a national Adderall shortage.

00:05:40.720 Did you know that?

00:05:42.280 There's an Adderall shortage.

00:05:44.020 And apparently it's a intentional shortage.

00:05:47.140 So I guess the government has put some kind of a cap on how much can be made.

00:05:52.820 Presumably because of abuse.

00:05:55.240 Now, I've watched the arguments online and they're very predictable.

00:06:00.620 It's the everyone, no, the fewer they are, the complete.

00:06:05.080 So this argument is in the form of, let's pretend that if there's a large group of people, that whenever we talk about them, that the few people in that group are considered the same as all of them.

00:06:18.440 And it's the reverse on the opposite side.

00:06:21.560 So here's what you see.

00:06:23.380 You see the people who genuinely need Adderall, because there is a type of person, a type of brain, where it's all positive.

00:06:31.780 It's all positive.

00:06:32.840 They really, really need it.

00:06:35.800 So they say, hey, this is a valuable thing I need and it's being prevented and it's all bad.

00:06:41.460 It is all bad.

00:06:42.700 If you're on Adderall and you need it, and then you have to go without it, that's no joke.

00:06:48.960 I don't think people understand what that's, the implications of that.

00:06:53.820 That can turn a person into a completely dysfunctional person.

00:06:58.240 And there may be some health risks of not tapering off as well.

00:07:03.440 I don't know about that, but I think the withdrawal is kind of nasty.

00:07:07.680 So you've got one group who's saying this is a national emergency and is created by the government.

00:07:13.700 And people like me are going to be really, really in trouble.

00:07:18.960 This is no joke.

00:07:20.720 There's a group of human beings in this country who are government, for reasons that may have been well-intentioned, but of course everything goes wrong.

00:07:29.940 They are absolutely screwed.

00:07:33.580 And I feel like there's zero empathy, because a lot of people are in the other camp that says,

00:07:40.640 oh, this is just because you found a legal way to get a meth.

00:07:45.240 That's what the critics say.

00:07:46.840 Oh, it's, you know, uh-huh, you won't be able to concentrate extra good, so big deal, you'll just be like me after that.

00:07:56.360 All right, now here's the problem.

00:07:58.740 Both sides are right, completely right, for some percentage of the population.

00:08:05.180 But both of them are completely wrong about what's going on with the other half.

00:08:10.740 I don't know if it's half, but something like that.

00:08:13.740 And once again, it's another example of complete inability to have a useful conversation.

00:08:20.760 The honest conversation is that a lack of Adderall will absolutely screw maybe tens of millions of people.

00:08:29.360 I mean, it's a lot, at least millions.

00:08:32.220 I say millions at a minimum.

00:08:34.440 And at the same time, it's 100% true that the drug is really overused and over-prescribed,

00:08:42.120 and that people who don't need it, need it, are certainly getting it.

00:08:46.000 So is nobody able to say both things can be true, that we have a national emergency for a group of Americans

00:08:55.120 who it looks like the other group of Americans just don't give a shit about, don't give a shit about them?

00:09:02.600 Absolutely wrong.

00:09:04.180 I'm going to take the same view on this that I take with, I know this will seem weird, Confederate statues.

00:09:10.940 That my opinion of Confederate statues isn't really part of the issue.

00:09:17.900 The issue is some large percentage, doesn't mean it's a majority,

00:09:22.300 but some large percentage of Americans are offended by it.

00:09:25.580 That's good enough.

00:09:27.120 That's all I need to hear.

00:09:28.380 Oh, it's offensive to a large group of people.

00:09:31.120 They have reasons that sound reasonable to me.

00:09:33.840 I mean, I could argue against it, but it's just a fact that people are offended.

00:09:37.560 So I'll just, I'll treat the fact that people feel that way as important.

00:09:43.880 Now, obviously the analogy doesn't work for a medical thing.

00:09:47.820 But the point is, if there's a huge bunch of Americans who legitimately are going to get screwed by this,

00:09:53.840 I do care.

00:09:55.580 Like, I do care.

00:09:56.740 And you should care too.

00:09:58.080 You should care because these are innocent people with a real medical problem,

00:10:02.400 and your government is going to leave them out there to just fucking twist.

00:10:07.980 It is evil.

00:10:09.920 It's just pure evil.

00:10:12.060 Now, I don't have an easy solution because I also know that it's overprescribed.

00:10:16.820 That's a real thing.

00:10:18.420 And it's like a really big, important thing.

00:10:21.140 So you just have competing interests.

00:10:23.100 But my personal ethical bias is toward the actual people who have medical use for it.

00:10:34.360 So if you don't have empathy for them,

00:10:39.780 yeah, if you don't have empathy for that group,

00:10:42.960 maybe it's because you don't know how bad it will be,

00:10:46.560 which I think is mostly the case.

00:10:48.220 But maybe just talk to some people who have an actual medical need for it,

00:10:53.440 and you're going to see some real panic,

00:10:55.440 and that panic is justified.

00:10:58.500 There's a real medical crisis coming that's big.

00:11:03.060 It's going to affect productivity, relationships, everything.

00:11:07.200 I mean, we've got a big problem coming if we don't fix that.

00:11:13.620 All right.

00:11:14.860 Here's something going my way.

00:11:16.400 Oliver Stone, who you might imagine is a left-leaning kind of a guy,

00:11:21.300 just produced a pro-nuclear energy movie

00:11:24.260 that's just completely pro-nuclear energy.

00:11:27.680 Now, I'm sure he talks about the good and the bad of it,

00:11:30.840 but it's unambiguously designed to say

00:11:34.580 the only thing that can save us from climate change is nuclear energy.

00:11:41.980 Can we all take a bow?

00:11:43.300 Well, I would say that this audience, by and large,

00:11:48.460 has been on this page for a long time.

00:11:51.120 You know, the people who are better informed about nuclear energy

00:11:54.160 have been pro-nuclear energy for years.

00:11:56.600 It's only the people who are lesser informed about the risks.

00:12:00.100 They're using an old model of the risk

00:12:02.280 that doesn't apply with the new technology.

00:12:05.880 Generation 3 nuclear plants never had a problem.

00:12:09.440 The current ones that you would build today never had a problem.

00:12:14.660 And the odds of it are not that high.

00:12:17.640 And if they did have a problem, it probably wouldn't be that big.

00:12:22.080 So, Oliver Stone, thank you.

00:12:26.180 I would consider this...

00:12:27.440 I would consider what Oliver Stone is doing

00:12:29.960 a patriotic donation to the country.

00:12:36.500 I mean, I hope he makes money on it and all that.

00:12:38.840 But to me, this just looks like pure patriotism

00:12:41.060 from somebody whose views might not always line up with mine.

00:12:45.740 I appreciate it.

00:12:47.860 All right, so I've been saying for a long time

00:12:50.280 that the Democrats don't argue in favor of keeping TikTok

00:12:53.880 because if they did, it would sound either stupid

00:12:58.000 or uninformed or nakedly political.

00:13:02.860 So they just can't say it.

00:13:06.300 They just can't.

00:13:08.760 But today they did

00:13:10.020 because I guess the CEO of TikTok

00:13:11.740 is going to be testifying to Congress

00:13:14.220 and at least the news is saying

00:13:16.500 that the Biden administration has demanded

00:13:18.840 that TikTok's Chinese owners sell their steaks.

00:13:21.140 Now, I didn't know that the Biden administration

00:13:24.160 had a clear statement like that.

00:13:27.680 That's the first time I've read that.

00:13:29.680 So it's reporting about the statement,

00:13:31.780 but I haven't seen the statement.

00:13:33.880 So I wonder...

00:13:35.540 To me, this news is not clean.

00:13:38.500 There's something missing on why suddenly

00:13:40.360 the news says that the Biden administration

00:13:42.860 wants to change TikTok's ownership.

00:13:46.260 I guess that's the softer thing than banning it.

00:13:48.500 So maybe they're looking for some way

00:13:51.420 to keep the political benefit of it

00:13:53.240 while getting rid of some of the Chinese risk of ownership.

00:13:57.900 But here's the counterargument

00:13:59.060 made by Representative Jamal Bowman.

00:14:03.420 And believe me when I say

00:14:05.620 this is the best argument

00:14:07.140 for keeping TikTok that I've seen.

00:14:10.940 It's just the best one.

00:14:14.160 Jamal says...

00:14:15.500 Jamal Bowman says...

00:14:17.820 Quote,

00:14:18.280 Republicans ain't got no swag.

00:14:20.580 That's why they want to ban TikTok.

00:14:24.500 That's why.

00:14:26.220 So his counterargument to Chinese government

00:14:30.120 having control over the data of Americans

00:14:33.560 and being able to persuade political events in America

00:14:37.180 and program our youth,

00:14:39.300 his response to that is

00:14:40.800 Republicans ain't got no swag.

00:14:42.360 That's why they want to ban TikTok.

00:14:45.060 Ain't got no swag.

00:14:46.720 Now, he is the stupidest person

00:14:48.840 that I've seen in politics

00:14:50.480 since the last time Jerry Nadler said something.

00:14:54.860 But how in the world...

00:14:57.280 How in the world can you support a team that's this stupid?

00:15:01.320 I'd love to say this is just political.

00:15:04.400 I mean, it comes off as just political.

00:15:06.280 But does he think that his own base is so stupid

00:15:09.700 that the real issue he's identified is they got no swag?

00:15:13.680 They got no swag.

00:15:15.100 Now, the context, just to be fair,

00:15:17.620 the context here is that he wants to use TikTok

00:15:20.660 to, quote, engage young people in politics.

00:15:23.620 He wants to keep young people engaged.

00:15:25.400 And he believes, this is my interpretation,

00:15:28.320 that Democrats, because they have swag,

00:15:30.980 they can use this cool new tool,

00:15:33.620 this TikTok tool,

00:15:35.980 whereas the sleepy old Republicans,

00:15:39.500 they don't know how to use this cool new tool

00:15:41.580 called TikTok.

00:15:43.060 They can't make viral memes.

00:15:45.280 So Republicans are trying to stop it

00:15:47.480 because they don't know how to make memes

00:15:49.340 and they don't know how to make viral videos.

00:15:52.900 Okay, that's your best argument?

00:15:55.620 That's stupid.

00:15:57.160 That's just stupid.

00:15:59.160 So there's some things that you can say,

00:16:01.200 well, that's a different point of view.

00:16:03.620 This is not one of those.

00:16:06.540 This is not a different point of view problem.

00:16:09.960 This is just stupid and lying.

00:16:13.660 And there's this old man with a sign

00:16:16.260 standing next to him.

00:16:17.900 They somehow got a group of ridiculous losers

00:16:21.060 to hold signs to keep TikTok.

00:16:24.060 Now, I get that people like TikTok,

00:16:27.780 but that's not the argument for keeping it.

00:16:30.700 It's really useful.

00:16:32.720 That's not the argument for keeping it.

00:16:35.740 Businesses use it to advertise it.

00:16:37.500 Yes.

00:16:38.780 Not the argument for keeping it.

00:16:41.400 None of these are even on point.

00:16:43.400 They're completely ignoring the argument.

00:16:44.960 So, anyway, it looks like the TikTok situation

00:16:49.700 is going my way

00:16:51.500 because the counter-argument has now been surfaced

00:16:53.800 and the counter-argument is stupid.

00:16:56.680 It's just stupid.

00:16:59.320 Well, here's a puzzling update.

00:17:02.360 China is developing its own mRNA vaccination.

00:17:06.800 Do they know that they shouldn't call it a vaccination?

00:17:12.660 I wonder if anybody's mentioned that to them.

00:17:17.480 So, doesn't this raise questions?

00:17:22.340 So, let's say you're an American citizen.

00:17:24.640 You've been watching the whole situation

00:17:26.420 and have not many American citizens concluded

00:17:31.660 and a number of medical professionals,

00:17:34.280 but clearly not all of them,

00:17:36.540 concluded that the mRNA thing

00:17:38.520 was a little bit dangerous in its own way.

00:17:43.380 Now, still the official word

00:17:45.020 is that it kept people alive.

00:17:47.100 That's still the official medical consensus in America.

00:17:51.660 But mostly the older people

00:17:53.160 and probably it was just more bad than good

00:17:55.020 for younger people.

00:17:56.920 But given that situation,

00:17:59.340 why would China go ahead

00:18:01.160 and do their own version of it?

00:18:04.680 Is it a version that somehow avoids,

00:18:07.460 I don't know,

00:18:07.800 the spike protein problem or something?

00:18:10.080 I mean, I don't know enough

00:18:10.900 about the science to speak of it.

00:18:13.020 But do you think in China

00:18:15.860 it's just that the pharmaceutical company,

00:18:18.180 which is fully owned by China,

00:18:20.380 do you think China's own pharmaceutical company

00:18:22.740 is just operating on lying and money

00:18:27.260 and has convinced the government of China

00:18:29.840 to do something that's bad for the government of China

00:18:33.100 because of money?

00:18:36.280 See, I see how that could work

00:18:38.360 in the American system and the European systems.

00:18:40.920 But I don't know.

00:18:43.300 It seems weird that that would be the dynamic

00:18:45.920 in the Chinese system.

00:18:48.180 So here's what I wonder.

00:18:51.360 Did the Chinese scientists not study

00:18:54.880 what happened in America with mRNA

00:18:57.300 and therefore have an updated idea

00:19:00.260 of what the risks and rewards are,

00:19:02.440 did they look at all the data that's available

00:19:04.520 and conclude that it was safe?

00:19:08.000 Did that happen?

00:19:09.060 You know, it's easy for me to imagine

00:19:12.380 there's some weird distorted thing happening in China

00:19:15.720 that might mirror our own distorted situation.

00:19:19.620 In the U.S., you could easily argue

00:19:21.580 that it was all about money

00:19:22.700 and somebody hid some data.

00:19:25.340 But now that we've got a couple of years

00:19:27.680 of mRNA experience

00:19:29.520 and China would have access

00:19:31.480 to pretty much all of the things

00:19:33.660 that our scientists have,

00:19:36.240 how do they look at it all

00:19:38.440 and say, let's do this?

00:19:40.340 Does that raise any questions with you?

00:19:43.940 I don't quite understand what's going on here.

00:19:47.060 Because if, well, let me ask you this question.

00:19:50.300 Knowing everything we know about the mRNA

00:19:52.700 as of today,

00:19:55.220 you know, today's knowledge,

00:19:56.420 if we could rewind

00:19:57.720 and the government had to do it all over again,

00:20:01.200 do you think they would have done it the same way?

00:20:04.360 Because I think they would have.

00:20:05.960 I think they would have.

00:20:06.680 Based on current data,

00:20:08.780 I think they would have.

00:20:09.900 They would have maybe given

00:20:11.260 fewer vaccinations to young people.

00:20:13.620 But I think they would have still given it over 60

00:20:15.840 and people had comorbidities.

00:20:19.560 That's what I think.

00:20:20.480 I think that's what they would say

00:20:21.640 based on the current information.

00:20:23.660 Now, the thing we don't know

00:20:24.880 is what happens in the long run.

00:20:28.360 You know, does your body get degraded

00:20:30.040 in some long run way?

00:20:31.000 But, you know, the Chinese have all the same information

00:20:33.560 we do, I'll bet.

00:20:36.280 So I don't, I guess it's a confusing situation.

00:20:39.480 I don't know why they would.

00:20:41.740 Now, the benefit of the mRNA platform

00:20:44.540 is that you can more quickly come up with a vaccine,

00:20:49.360 let's call it, vaccine.

00:20:51.060 You can do it more quickly than the old way of,

00:20:56.160 you know, well, the old way.

00:20:58.540 So apparently they think that catching up

00:21:00.360 or keeping up with the variants

00:21:02.440 is more important than whatever risk

00:21:04.840 the platform brings.

00:21:07.220 I don't know, it's just curious

00:21:08.300 that they would make that decision.

00:21:09.980 So here's a story that's super alarming.

00:21:18.360 According to the New York Post

00:21:19.620 and Miranda Devine.

00:21:22.260 Now, you remember Miranda was,

00:21:24.000 I think, the first reporter

00:21:25.580 on the Hunter Biden laptop story.

00:21:28.280 So we know her to be credible and accurate.

00:21:33.380 So that's your context.

00:21:35.560 Somebody who's credible on this very domain

00:21:38.020 and accurate.

00:21:38.800 But this story, I think,

00:21:40.760 is short of being confirmed.

00:21:43.260 So I'm not going to say I believe the story

00:21:44.980 on the first telling.

00:21:46.760 But what we know about the story,

00:21:48.920 according to Miranda, who is credible,

00:21:51.360 is very disturbing.

00:21:52.820 And it goes like this.

00:21:54.680 There's some gentleman, Robert Hinnock.

00:22:01.140 Oh, no, I'm sorry.

00:22:02.780 Mr. Luft is the person.

00:22:04.700 He said that he had some kind of deep

00:22:07.180 contacts with intel people.

00:22:10.520 And he's just one of these guys

00:22:11.900 who has a lot of deep contacts

00:22:14.340 with the intelligence world.

00:22:16.140 He says he tried four years ago

00:22:17.880 to inform the Department of Justice

00:22:19.500 in the U.S.

00:22:20.240 He's not an American.

00:22:21.840 That the Chinese state-controlled

00:22:23.240 energy company, CEFC,

00:22:25.920 had paid $100,000 a month

00:22:27.880 to President Biden's son, Hunter,

00:22:30.020 and $65,000 to Joe's brother, Jim,

00:22:33.780 in exchange for their FBI connections,

00:22:37.240 which is rumored to be

00:22:38.760 some connection guy, one eye.

00:22:41.080 That's some FBI guy

00:22:42.320 who was telling him insider stuff

00:22:43.760 from the FBI.

00:22:44.800 And they were using their FBI insider,

00:22:48.520 presumably illegal sources,

00:22:51.080 because I can't imagine

00:22:52.020 this would be legal,

00:22:52.980 and using the Biden's name

00:22:56.740 to promote China's

00:22:57.800 Belt and Road Initiative.

00:22:59.540 All right.

00:23:00.040 So there's this guy

00:23:01.540 not from the U.S.

00:23:02.900 He might be Israeli.

00:23:05.660 I think he's an Israeli citizen.

00:23:07.420 He gets picked up in Cyprus

00:23:09.360 on behalf of the United States.

00:23:13.060 So here's a guy

00:23:14.160 who's been warning

00:23:15.000 that he has direct

00:23:16.080 personal knowledge

00:23:17.100 because he learned

00:23:18.360 of the scheme,

00:23:19.620 the Hunter Biden scheme.

00:23:20.660 He learned it

00:23:21.300 through his own relationship

00:23:22.640 with Hunter's

00:23:23.820 Chinese business partners.

00:23:25.780 He didn't hear it

00:23:27.020 from a third-hand party.

00:23:28.800 He heard it from the people

00:23:30.400 who were paying Hunter directly

00:23:32.480 because he knows him personally.

00:23:35.060 That's a really good source.

00:23:37.740 So this really good source,

00:23:39.900 who has information

00:23:41.180 about Biden family

00:23:42.740 and FBI corruption,

00:23:44.240 was picked up in Cyprus

00:23:46.040 for being an arms dealer,

00:23:49.080 for being an arms dealer.

00:23:51.300 Do you know what he says

00:23:52.020 about that?

00:23:53.520 The guy who was picked up?

00:23:54.740 He says,

00:23:55.080 I've been arrested in Cyprus

00:23:56.180 on a politically motivated

00:23:57.640 extradition request

00:23:58.940 by the U.S.

00:24:00.300 The U.S.

00:24:01.400 claiming I'm an arms dealer.

00:24:03.320 It would be funny

00:24:04.300 if it weren't tragic.

00:24:05.680 I've never been an arms dealer.

00:24:08.180 Don't you think

00:24:08.880 that that would be easy

00:24:09.780 to prove or disprove

00:24:10.940 that he was

00:24:12.300 or was not an arms dealer?

00:24:16.140 I've got a feeling

00:24:17.120 that he's not an arms dealer

00:24:18.480 and that it might be

00:24:19.960 exactly what it looks like,

00:24:21.720 which is he was arrested

00:24:23.320 because he's a critic

00:24:24.380 of the Bidens

00:24:25.080 and has actually information

00:24:26.560 that would put them all in jail.

00:24:28.760 That's what it looks like.

00:24:30.640 Now, it's way too early.

00:24:32.760 Fog of war.

00:24:33.820 You know,

00:24:34.040 first versions of stories

00:24:35.360 tend to change.

00:24:36.760 So I wouldn't go all the way

00:24:38.340 to believe in that.

00:24:39.700 But if later you find out

00:24:41.260 that this gentleman

00:24:43.020 does indeed have no connection

00:24:45.620 whatsoever to arms dealing,

00:24:48.220 then I think you know

00:24:49.040 what you need to know.

00:24:50.940 And I'm pretty sure

00:24:52.220 that you don't say

00:24:52.980 something like this.

00:24:55.300 This is just my liar filter,

00:24:58.200 my BS filter.

00:24:59.600 My BS filter says

00:25:00.880 you don't say this sentence

00:25:02.720 unless it's true.

00:25:04.460 Here's the sentence.

00:25:06.320 The U.S.

00:25:07.180 claiming I'm an arms dealer.

00:25:08.640 It would be funny

00:25:09.960 if it weren't tragic.

00:25:11.420 I've never been an arms dealer.

00:25:13.800 I've never been an arms dealer.

00:25:16.180 And that it's funny?

00:25:17.780 That's somebody

00:25:18.660 who's telling the truth.

00:25:21.120 Now, if that's a lie,

00:25:23.160 I would be very surprised.

00:25:26.420 Because liars don't talk like that.

00:25:28.920 This is the cleanest,

00:25:30.300 most direct denial

00:25:31.600 of something that presumably

00:25:33.420 would be easy to prove.

00:25:36.100 It would be easy to prove

00:25:37.040 one way or another.

00:25:37.560 So you don't say something

00:25:38.840 so declaratively,

00:25:41.160 absolutely,

00:25:42.400 I've never been an arms dealer.

00:25:44.040 unless you can back that up.

00:25:47.700 See, what would he say

00:25:48.520 if he were guilty?

00:25:50.680 Here's how guilty people talk.

00:25:52.400 They have no evidence

00:25:53.400 of these charges.

00:25:55.260 Right?

00:25:55.840 The evidence,

00:25:56.520 it's a trumped up charge.

00:25:59.100 Right?

00:25:59.760 They don't mention the details.

00:26:01.560 It's very unusual

00:26:02.520 for somebody to say directly,

00:26:04.120 I've never had anything

00:26:05.300 to do with this.

00:26:07.160 Just,

00:26:07.540 I'm not even involved

00:26:08.400 in any way.

00:26:09.000 that's an unusual denial

00:26:11.020 for somebody

00:26:12.380 who would be guilty.

00:26:14.020 So,

00:26:14.520 he's signaling innocence,

00:26:16.240 pretty clearly.

00:26:18.520 And he's signaling

00:26:19.560 that he does have

00:26:20.360 the goods on the Bidens.

00:26:23.100 And it looks like

00:26:24.220 the Biden crime family

00:26:25.800 is exactly what it looks like.

00:26:29.260 It's literally

00:26:30.180 an organized crime situation.

00:26:34.320 It's hard for me

00:26:35.160 to come to any other conclusion

00:26:36.620 than it's literally

00:26:38.060 organized crime.

00:26:40.020 That's,

00:26:40.880 it's hard to imagine

00:26:41.940 any other,

00:26:42.520 any other explanation.

00:26:44.140 But,

00:26:44.540 like I say,

00:26:45.060 it's early.

00:26:45.700 Anything could happen

00:26:46.580 to change the story.

00:26:49.420 Some people are saying

00:26:50.460 that the prosecutor,

00:26:52.200 Alvin Bragg,

00:26:52.940 who's trying to put

00:26:53.540 Trump in jail,

00:26:54.700 should be in jail himself,

00:26:56.100 and I agree with that.

00:26:57.500 I would say,

00:26:58.160 based on what we've seen

00:26:59.240 so far,

00:27:00.620 if it turns,

00:27:01.260 if it turns out

00:27:02.040 that what we know so far

00:27:03.480 or think we do

00:27:04.420 turns out to be true,

00:27:06.040 I don't know

00:27:07.340 if he's committed

00:27:07.960 technically a crime,

00:27:09.860 but he is someone

00:27:10.600 who should be in jail

00:27:11.620 if you had a functional system

00:27:13.460 that was working well.

00:27:15.960 He should be,

00:27:17.000 based on what we know.

00:27:18.780 And what we know

00:27:19.740 is that he signaled

00:27:21.080 in advance

00:27:21.700 that he was going

00:27:22.480 after Trump

00:27:23.100 before he had a crime.

00:27:25.540 That's good enough.

00:27:27.220 That's good enough.

00:27:28.820 If the only thing you know

00:27:29.960 is he ran for office

00:27:30.920 promising to get Trump

00:27:32.260 before he knew

00:27:33.920 what possibly

00:27:35.000 he would charge him with,

00:27:36.900 that's good enough.

00:27:39.120 That's everything

00:27:39.640 you need to know.

00:27:40.820 That's a criminal

00:27:41.880 who may not have

00:27:44.220 broken a specific law,

00:27:46.400 but in all the ways

00:27:48.540 that the word criminal

00:27:49.500 is important,

00:27:50.560 except for maybe

00:27:51.260 the penalty,

00:27:52.780 that's criminal.

00:27:54.480 To tell me

00:27:55.560 that I should only

00:27:56.300 call that unethical,

00:27:58.560 I'm sorry.

00:27:59.620 I'm not going to call

00:28:00.400 that just political.

00:28:01.260 I'm not going to call

00:28:02.620 it unethical.

00:28:04.040 That's a fucking crime.

00:28:05.940 If you tell me

00:28:06.840 there's nothing

00:28:07.420 on the books

00:28:07.920 that makes that criminal,

00:28:09.280 okay,

00:28:10.040 I'll listen to that.

00:28:11.480 I might even say

00:28:12.380 that's true.

00:28:13.260 Still criminal.

00:28:14.800 It's a crime.

00:28:16.700 I don't care

00:28:17.460 if it's legal or not.

00:28:22.300 Apparently,

00:28:22.960 there's a new document

00:28:23.900 uncovered,

00:28:24.820 which we had not

00:28:25.880 been aware of,

00:28:26.620 and it makes me wonder

00:28:27.580 if the grand jury

00:28:28.960 was aware of it either.

00:28:29.920 that it's a 2018 document

00:28:32.780 from Michael Cohen's

00:28:34.440 own attorney,

00:28:35.720 so he's no longer

00:28:36.800 the attorney,

00:28:37.380 I believe,

00:28:38.280 and a letter to the

00:28:39.140 Federal Election Commission

00:28:40.480 says that the payments,

00:28:42.820 these payments

00:28:43.380 to Stormy Daniel,

00:28:44.660 the payment in question

00:28:45.600 does not constitute

00:28:46.640 a campaign contribution,

00:28:48.680 and according to this letter

00:28:51.400 at the time,

00:28:52.140 2018,

00:28:53.200 it was Michael Cohen's

00:28:54.540 own money.

00:28:55.040 It was his own money.

00:28:59.020 Now,

00:28:59.620 I don't think

00:29:00.480 that's a complete defense,

00:29:02.500 but what is a complete defense

00:29:04.300 is that we didn't see

00:29:05.460 that letter until now.

00:29:07.260 If it's true

00:29:08.320 that this just arose,

00:29:10.900 but it's been around

00:29:11.840 since 2018,

00:29:13.820 it's very,

00:29:14.780 it's very,

00:29:15.780 let's say,

00:29:16.920 positive for Trump's side.

00:29:19.000 if Alvin Bragg

00:29:21.080 intentionally

00:29:21.840 kept this bit of evidence

00:29:23.680 from the public,

00:29:24.580 again,

00:29:25.020 I don't think

00:29:25.800 it's a confirmation

00:29:26.440 of anything,

00:29:27.340 but it's an important

00:29:28.480 piece of evidence.

00:29:29.980 If the grand jury

00:29:31.420 didn't see this,

00:29:33.540 then Alvin Bragg,

00:29:34.860 if he intentionally

00:29:36.020 kept it from him,

00:29:37.940 I would think

00:29:38.600 that's criminal.

00:29:39.660 Again,

00:29:40.040 I don't know

00:29:40.380 if it's illegal,

00:29:41.800 but it's a crime

00:29:43.140 by any basic standard

00:29:45.660 of human behavior.

00:29:50.400 So,

00:29:51.680 yeah,

00:29:54.080 I guess it was

00:29:54.660 Senator Rand Paul

00:29:55.720 who said that

00:29:56.480 the Manhattan DA,

00:29:58.400 Alvin Bragg,

00:29:58.940 should be in jail.

00:29:59.980 That's different

00:30:00.560 from saying

00:30:01.040 he violated

00:30:02.640 a specific crime.

00:30:04.480 I would say

00:30:05.260 that the world

00:30:06.080 would be better

00:30:06.680 if he were in jail.

00:30:08.520 I agree with that.

00:30:10.120 He seems like somebody

00:30:11.120 who is only bad

00:30:12.240 for the world,

00:30:13.140 does not have

00:30:14.160 good intentions,

00:30:15.380 is signaling

00:30:15.980 his bad intentions

00:30:16.960 as loudly

00:30:17.600 as anybody possibly could,

00:30:19.160 and then he's

00:30:19.660 playing out

00:30:20.120 his bad intentions

00:30:21.120 and malign

00:30:22.820 point of view

00:30:24.180 right in front of us.

00:30:25.340 Yeah,

00:30:25.640 that's somebody

00:30:26.240 that you want in jail.

00:30:28.080 You want them in jail.

00:30:29.740 The world would be better

00:30:30.860 if he were in jail.

00:30:31.740 That's just a fact.

00:30:34.980 Well,

00:30:35.800 one of my favorite

00:30:37.540 commentators,

00:30:38.660 Van Jones,

00:30:40.240 said on CNN

00:30:41.360 that he would not

00:30:42.560 be surprised

00:30:43.300 if Alvin Bragg

00:30:45.100 held back

00:30:45.740 an indictment

00:30:46.320 of former Trump

00:30:47.340 or former President Trump

00:30:48.500 arguing that the prosecutor

00:30:50.520 should wait

00:30:51.100 for the former president

00:30:52.180 to be slapped

00:30:53.560 with more serious charges.

00:30:57.740 And I guess,

00:30:59.260 I guess Van Jones

00:31:00.820 said on CNN,

00:31:02.340 quote,

00:31:02.820 I think that the heat

00:31:03.760 is on this DA.

00:31:04.640 I think he's going

00:31:05.560 to make

00:31:06.020 a very sober decision

00:31:07.960 and I would not

00:31:09.160 be surprised

00:31:09.760 if he doesn't

00:31:10.360 step back

00:31:10.980 from the brink.

00:31:14.300 So,

00:31:15.540 you see why I say

00:31:17.280 Van Jones

00:31:18.520 is one of your

00:31:19.180 most useful voices

00:31:21.940 in politics?

00:31:22.940 And what I mean by that

00:31:24.060 is he's willing

00:31:24.720 to look at the whole field

00:31:26.060 and then talk

00:31:27.420 as though he's seen

00:31:28.180 the whole field.

00:31:29.840 Now,

00:31:30.340 if you read

00:31:31.440 between the lines,

00:31:32.420 I think he's

00:31:32.980 clearly indicating

00:31:34.240 in the softest way

00:31:36.420 you can

00:31:36.760 to the CNN audience

00:31:37.800 that this is in fact

00:31:39.400 a political operation

00:31:40.740 and not about the law.

00:31:43.260 Now,

00:31:43.520 he didn't say

00:31:44.140 this is political

00:31:45.060 but

00:31:46.480 that's

00:31:47.880 the indication

00:31:49.020 that you would get

00:31:49.920 if you said

00:31:50.760 you would wait

00:31:52.320 for a more serious charge

00:31:53.700 and he's going to

00:31:54.660 step back from the brink

00:31:55.800 because of political pressure.

00:31:57.960 If political pressure

00:31:59.180 makes you

00:32:00.120 pull back,

00:32:01.000 we don't know

00:32:01.480 that that's happened

00:32:02.140 but it might be,

00:32:02.820 if political pressure

00:32:04.880 makes you move back

00:32:05.880 then it was

00:32:07.080 a political process

00:32:08.500 because I don't believe

00:32:10.080 if they had

00:32:11.340 a real crime

00:32:12.240 that political pressure

00:32:13.920 would make any difference.

00:32:16.120 Political pressure

00:32:16.840 doesn't make you

00:32:17.440 stop prosecuting

00:32:18.360 an actual criminal,

00:32:20.300 does it?

00:32:21.540 Political pressure

00:32:22.560 could only help you

00:32:23.800 against somebody

00:32:24.860 who's clearly

00:32:25.400 not a real criminal.

00:32:27.780 I mean,

00:32:28.400 I think.

00:32:29.660 Have you ever heard

00:32:30.320 of a story

00:32:30.880 where political pressure

00:32:32.700 got somebody off

00:32:33.840 from the public?

00:32:37.640 OJ.

00:32:38.500 Well,

00:32:38.760 that's in the jury.

00:32:40.980 I'm not going

00:32:41.660 to count the jury

00:32:42.280 but the question

00:32:43.600 to prosecute or not?

00:32:46.860 I don't know.

00:32:47.940 If there's a real crime,

00:32:49.180 I think they always prosecute.

00:32:50.600 If there's a sketchy,

00:32:52.160 gray area,

00:32:53.560 novel legal theory,

00:32:55.340 then maybe they don't

00:32:56.580 because of political pressure.

00:32:57.760 I think that's where we are.

00:32:58.600 All right.

00:33:01.000 So,

00:33:01.900 I guess the grand jury

00:33:02.900 meets again today

00:33:03.700 so we don't know

00:33:04.380 if anything's delayed.

00:33:05.680 It could be just

00:33:06.260 normal process

00:33:07.080 because everything

00:33:07.940 in the world

00:33:08.440 is later than you think.

00:33:10.380 Well,

00:33:11.520 President Biden's

00:33:13.020 spokesperson,

00:33:14.360 John Pierre blah blah,

00:33:16.480 I've decided

00:33:17.560 that I'm not going

00:33:18.220 to learn more than

00:33:19.100 two names

00:33:19.980 for any one person.

00:33:21.780 It's just sort of a rule.

00:33:23.660 So,

00:33:24.840 you know,

00:33:25.160 I remember my own name,

00:33:27.040 Scott Adams.

00:33:28.520 I don't make you

00:33:29.520 remember my middle name

00:33:30.660 because I feel

00:33:31.860 three is too much.

00:33:33.420 Three is too much.

00:33:34.480 I can barely remember

00:33:35.700 somebody's first name

00:33:36.800 but

00:33:37.960 if somebody comes at me

00:33:40.360 with a three-name situation,

00:33:42.480 I'm just going to

00:33:43.480 take the first two.

00:33:45.080 So,

00:33:45.480 she's just

00:33:45.860 Jean-Pierre to me.

00:33:46.880 I can't be bothered

00:33:47.780 with third names

00:33:48.820 of people.

00:33:49.840 No disrespect

00:33:50.680 to Jean-Pierre.

00:33:51.660 Just generally speaking,

00:33:54.520 I like two names maximum.

00:33:56.360 That's all I can handle.

00:33:57.900 So,

00:33:58.460 she was asked

00:33:58.980 about the story

00:33:59.780 of the

00:34:00.380 documented

00:34:01.760 evidence

00:34:03.200 that the Biden family

00:34:04.540 received money

00:34:05.320 from

00:34:05.800 foreign entity

00:34:07.140 and here is

00:34:08.580 the perfectly

00:34:09.240 sensible

00:34:09.860 and coherent answer

00:34:11.120 from

00:34:12.460 Jean-Pierre

00:34:13.460 blah blah

00:34:14.440 last name

00:34:15.920 and she said

00:34:17.260 look,

00:34:18.940 I'm just

00:34:19.740 not going to

00:34:20.580 respond to that

00:34:21.400 from here.

00:34:22.700 Look,

00:34:23.400 we have heard

00:34:24.040 from House Republicans

00:34:24.900 for years and years

00:34:26.060 how the inaccuracies

00:34:28.220 and lies

00:34:28.960 when it comes

00:34:29.500 to this issue

00:34:30.100 and

00:34:30.820 I don't even know

00:34:32.160 where to begin

00:34:32.740 to even answer

00:34:33.680 that question

00:34:34.260 because,

00:34:35.020 again,

00:34:36.020 it's been lies

00:34:36.860 and lies

00:34:37.340 and inaccuracy

00:34:38.060 for the past

00:34:38.660 couple of years

00:34:39.280 and I'm just

00:34:40.300 not going to get

00:34:41.120 into it from here.

00:34:41.920 all right,

00:34:44.980 so that's what

00:34:45.740 the actual

00:34:46.440 paid human being

00:34:47.720 who is

00:34:49.680 living proof

00:34:50.500 that

00:34:50.920 if you

00:34:53.300 try to satisfy

00:34:54.320 too many requirements

00:34:55.700 you get this.

00:34:58.460 So,

00:34:59.420 I think

00:35:00.780 it's perfectly

00:35:01.960 good for the country

00:35:03.320 to have a

00:35:05.200 spokesperson

00:35:05.660 as the president

00:35:07.260 who's a woman

00:35:08.060 for example.

00:35:08.880 I think

00:35:10.220 that's good.

00:35:11.140 It's good

00:35:11.540 that it's not

00:35:12.500 all a bunch

00:35:12.980 of white men

00:35:13.580 or something.

00:35:14.240 So,

00:35:14.420 I like that

00:35:14.780 she's a woman.

00:35:16.700 I like that

00:35:17.780 the spokesperson

00:35:18.600 for the president

00:35:19.340 can be black,

00:35:20.780 of course.

00:35:22.100 You know,

00:35:22.500 everybody

00:35:23.080 should be

00:35:24.120 equal opportunity.

00:35:25.560 So,

00:35:25.800 I like that

00:35:26.100 she's black.

00:35:26.760 I like that

00:35:27.160 she's a woman.

00:35:28.100 She's also,

00:35:28.880 I believe,

00:35:29.480 LGBTQ.

00:35:31.040 I like that too.

00:35:32.360 I like that

00:35:32.940 we've got a spokesperson

00:35:33.920 who's LGBTQ.

00:35:34.760 But the question

00:35:36.080 I ask

00:35:36.640 is if you work

00:35:38.040 so hard

00:35:38.440 to get all three

00:35:39.200 of those,

00:35:40.500 well,

00:35:40.920 black,

00:35:41.420 check,

00:35:41.940 that's good.

00:35:43.000 Woman,

00:35:43.540 check,

00:35:44.120 that's a plus.

00:35:45.720 LBGTQ,

00:35:46.680 great.

00:35:47.480 Glad everybody

00:35:48.400 gets the opportunity.

00:35:49.860 But are we really

00:35:51.100 going to pretend

00:35:51.720 that if you don't

00:35:52.500 try to get all three

00:35:53.320 of those things

00:35:53.860 you don't end up

00:35:54.500 with the worst

00:35:54.940 candidates?

00:35:56.100 On average.

00:35:57.780 I'm still allowing

00:35:58.640 that the best person

00:35:59.800 in the world

00:36:00.320 could be a black

00:36:02.200 lesbian.

00:36:03.500 could be the best

00:36:05.120 president we've

00:36:06.140 ever had.

00:36:07.480 Could be amazing.

00:36:09.040 In fact,

00:36:10.420 probably plenty

00:36:11.520 of examples of that.

00:36:12.680 My only point is

00:36:13.640 if you're focusing

00:36:15.560 on those things

00:36:16.720 as your main requirement,

00:36:18.300 you might leave

00:36:18.940 a little money

00:36:20.500 on the table.

00:36:22.100 And you might get

00:36:22.720 somebody who can

00:36:23.320 only answer a question

00:36:24.260 like this.

00:36:25.120 Look,

00:36:25.780 I'm just not going

00:36:26.600 to respond to that

00:36:27.400 from here.

00:36:27.960 Look,

00:36:28.860 we have heard...

00:36:30.500 All right,

00:36:30.920 now let's compare

00:36:31.720 her performance

00:36:32.860 to AI.

00:36:34.700 I saw a tweet

00:36:35.420 from Kenneth Raposa

00:36:36.800 who says,

00:36:38.120 I asked my new

00:36:38.840 friend Chet GPT

00:36:39.960 to pretend it was

00:36:40.860 a White House

00:36:41.360 press secretary

00:36:42.100 and I was a journalist

00:36:43.520 asking for a question.

00:36:45.340 And I said,

00:36:46.580 now I'm not going

00:36:49.480 to read you

00:36:50.020 the AI answer

00:36:51.740 to this.

00:36:52.840 I will simply say

00:36:54.040 that the AI's answer

00:36:55.320 was really professional.

00:36:57.920 It was complete.

00:36:59.540 Hit every note

00:37:00.400 you'd want to hit

00:37:01.160 and was a real

00:37:02.780 good representation

00:37:03.640 of the office

00:37:04.600 of the president.

00:37:07.920 Or,

00:37:08.760 you could hire

00:37:09.600 the three-checkbox

00:37:12.120 person who says,

00:37:13.720 look,

00:37:14.140 I'm just not going

00:37:15.060 to respond to that

00:37:15.860 from here.

00:37:17.580 From here?

00:37:19.000 Was there some

00:37:19.600 other place

00:37:20.080 she was going

00:37:20.440 to respond to it?

00:37:22.020 I'll respond to it

00:37:23.100 over there,

00:37:24.180 but I'm not going

00:37:24.940 to respond to it

00:37:25.580 from here.

00:37:26.040 I mean,

00:37:26.280 it's just,

00:37:26.660 it's babble.

00:37:28.100 It's just babble.

00:37:28.980 So,

00:37:30.780 think back

00:37:32.540 to not too

00:37:33.540 long ago.

00:37:35.000 Do you remember

00:37:35.900 not too long ago

00:37:36.840 I told you

00:37:37.580 that the reason

00:37:38.300 that AI

00:37:39.380 will not be

00:37:40.460 indistinguishable

00:37:41.480 from humans

00:37:42.380 is that nobody's

00:37:43.920 going to make

00:37:44.300 AI act stupid.

00:37:47.600 Unless you make

00:37:48.600 your AI act

00:37:49.540 as stupid

00:37:50.060 as John Pierre

00:37:51.300 blah blah

00:37:51.920 last name,

00:37:52.940 you're never

00:37:53.920 going to think

00:37:54.340 it's a human.

00:37:55.800 You're going to say,

00:37:56.460 oh,

00:37:56.740 those answers

00:37:57.300 were all good.

00:37:58.140 It must be AI.

00:37:58.860 That's always

00:38:00.920 been the problem.

00:38:02.520 It's always

00:38:03.140 been the problem

00:38:03.900 that you'd have

00:38:04.680 to make AI

00:38:05.300 dumber

00:38:05.700 to make it

00:38:06.640 believable.

00:38:07.720 It's hard

00:38:08.440 to wrap

00:38:09.080 your head

00:38:09.320 around that.

00:38:11.600 Rasmussen

00:38:12.060 has a poll

00:38:12.680 asking whether,

00:38:15.940 asking likely

00:38:16.740 U.S. voters,

00:38:17.940 do they believe

00:38:18.580 that Biden

00:38:18.960 has told

00:38:19.380 the complete

00:38:19.880 truth

00:38:20.320 about his

00:38:20.960 family's

00:38:21.420 foreign business

00:38:22.140 deals?

00:38:25.160 How many

00:38:25.960 American voters

00:38:27.180 do you think

00:38:28.000 and you're

00:38:29.960 allowed to

00:38:30.320 use your

00:38:30.640 ESB for

00:38:31.240 this?

00:38:32.120 In fact,

00:38:32.560 you can

00:38:32.800 answer the

00:38:33.200 question

00:38:33.460 before I

00:38:34.160 ask it.

00:38:35.600 Oh,

00:38:35.840 you're good.

00:38:37.480 So the

00:38:38.060 question is,

00:38:39.100 how many

00:38:39.500 think that

00:38:40.220 it's very

00:38:41.400 likely,

00:38:42.720 very likely,

00:38:43.600 that Biden

00:38:44.860 has told

00:38:45.340 the complete

00:38:46.000 truth about

00:38:46.660 his family's

00:38:47.260 foreign business

00:38:47.820 deals?

00:38:48.060 Oh,

00:38:50.680 wow,

00:38:50.900 your guesses

00:38:51.360 are really

00:38:52.680 close.

00:38:53.600 It's 24%.

00:38:54.860 Yeah,

00:38:55.880 you guessed

00:38:56.240 25.

00:38:56.960 Wow.

00:38:58.140 Wow.

00:38:58.700 Good job.

00:38:59.800 Good job.

00:39:00.760 Smartest

00:39:01.260 audience in

00:39:01.800 the world.

00:39:04.840 But,

00:39:05.440 let's see,

00:39:06.520 65% think,

00:39:09.020 let's see,

00:39:09.900 there was

00:39:10.140 another number

00:39:10.660 here that was

00:39:11.040 interesting.

00:39:13.320 65% of

00:39:14.380 voters believe

00:39:15.000 that Biden

00:39:15.400 family Chinese

00:39:16.180 connection is a

00:39:17.160 serious scandal.

00:39:18.880 So two

00:39:19.340 thirds of

00:39:19.840 the country

00:39:20.260 thinks that

00:39:22.180 it may not

00:39:22.700 be illegal,

00:39:23.280 but it's a

00:39:23.680 serious scandal.

00:39:27.020 Has there

00:39:27.640 ever been a

00:39:28.120 better week

00:39:28.580 for Trump?

00:39:30.080 I think

00:39:30.700 Trump's having

00:39:31.260 his very best

00:39:31.940 week.

00:39:33.140 Two thirds

00:39:33.580 of the country

00:39:34.160 thinks that

00:39:35.280 Biden is in

00:39:36.300 a scandal

00:39:36.980 with our

00:39:37.460 biggest

00:39:37.720 adversary,

00:39:38.440 China.

00:39:39.580 At the

00:39:39.940 same time,

00:39:41.320 I think the

00:39:41.920 majority of

00:39:42.420 the country

00:39:42.760 thinks that

00:39:43.320 this Alan

00:39:43.780 Bragg thing

00:39:44.300 is purely

00:39:44.760 political.

00:39:45.240 So everything

00:39:47.620 that you

00:39:48.260 imagined in

00:39:50.340 your

00:39:50.700 conspiratorial

00:39:51.840 mind is

00:39:53.120 actually looking

00:39:54.880 to be true.

00:39:56.240 I mean,

00:39:57.040 you never

00:39:57.720 know.

00:39:58.880 But it

00:39:59.460 looks like

00:40:00.260 there is a

00:40:01.300 huge scandal

00:40:02.020 with money

00:40:03.100 coming from

00:40:03.660 China and

00:40:04.140 maybe Ukraine.

00:40:05.240 It looks like

00:40:06.180 the prosecution

00:40:07.140 or potential

00:40:08.260 prosecution of

00:40:09.080 Trump on

00:40:09.680 this trumped

00:40:10.660 up charges

00:40:11.200 are completely

00:40:13.060 political

00:40:13.540 bullshit.

00:40:14.980 It's

00:40:15.200 everything you

00:40:15.660 thought it

00:40:15.920 was.

00:40:16.940 Here's another

00:40:17.460 story about

00:40:18.060 a professor

00:40:19.940 in Florida,

00:40:22.000 UCF

00:40:22.600 professor,

00:40:23.700 fired for

00:40:24.400 rejecting,

00:40:25.040 this is a

00:40:25.720 Fox News

00:40:26.160 story,

00:40:26.900 for rejecting

00:40:27.540 the notion

00:40:28.100 of systemic

00:40:29.940 racism.

00:40:31.740 And he

00:40:32.340 said that

00:40:32.820 the diversity

00:40:33.500 movement is

00:40:34.160 pretty much

00:40:34.680 anti-white

00:40:35.640 movement.

00:40:37.280 So he

00:40:37.900 got shunned

00:40:39.480 and banned,

00:40:40.300 but he got

00:40:40.620 his job

00:40:41.000 back.

00:40:41.360 Then you

00:40:42.940 read this

00:40:43.300 whole thing

00:40:43.640 where he's

00:40:44.000 saying that

00:40:44.440 the whole

00:40:44.860 DEI stuff

00:40:45.860 is just

00:40:46.380 an anti-white

00:40:47.100 movement in

00:40:47.740 disguise.

00:40:48.840 That's basically

00:40:49.460 all it is.

00:40:51.100 And he

00:40:54.060 got sort of

00:40:54.600 semi-cancelled,

00:40:55.480 but he got

00:40:55.800 back to work,

00:40:56.720 but all of his

00:40:57.560 co-workers won't

00:40:58.360 talk to him.

00:40:59.120 He's like shunned

00:41:00.020 at work.

00:41:01.020 But he's saying

00:41:01.560 that's fine,

00:41:02.220 because we're all

00:41:02.660 idiots,

00:41:03.100 basically.

00:41:04.080 I said that

00:41:04.840 part about all

00:41:05.400 idiots,

00:41:05.840 but he said,

00:41:06.540 yeah,

00:41:06.700 that's fine.

00:41:07.200 He doesn't

00:41:07.560 mind if people

00:41:08.120 like that

00:41:08.460 shun him.

00:41:08.840 But are

00:41:11.620 you waiting

00:41:11.960 for the,

00:41:12.420 here's the

00:41:12.800 punchline.

00:41:14.560 All right?

00:41:15.880 Just hear the

00:41:17.040 headline,

00:41:17.860 and then listen,

00:41:18.500 wait for the

00:41:18.880 punchline that's

00:41:19.560 way at the

00:41:20.000 back of the

00:41:20.440 story.

00:41:21.460 Headline,

00:41:22.680 Professor

00:41:23.120 Rejects

00:41:23.780 Systemic

00:41:24.220 Racism,

00:41:24.800 Says

00:41:25.000 It's

00:41:25.200 Anti-White.

00:41:27.360 Professor

00:41:27.920 himself is

00:41:29.020 half-white,

00:41:30.300 half-Hispanic,

00:41:31.380 and fully

00:41:32.140 gay.

00:41:33.700 Fully

00:41:34.200 gay.

00:41:34.460 And apparently

00:41:36.080 being gay

00:41:36.700 and half-Hispanic

00:41:37.640 was just

00:41:39.340 enough to

00:41:39.780 get your

00:41:40.080 job back,

00:41:41.240 but not

00:41:42.200 enough to

00:41:42.640 be happily

00:41:43.180 employed.

00:41:44.480 You can

00:41:45.100 still get

00:41:45.760 your job

00:41:46.240 back,

00:41:46.660 but we're

00:41:47.020 not completely

00:41:48.220 comfortable

00:41:48.700 with you.

00:41:49.860 Oh,

00:41:50.340 yeah,

00:41:51.140 you can

00:41:51.540 say you're

00:41:52.760 gay,

00:41:54.020 but that's

00:41:55.800 not enough

00:41:56.280 lately.

00:41:57.200 Lately,

00:41:57.760 that's not

00:41:58.160 enough.

00:41:58.900 So,

00:41:59.300 just if you

00:41:59.860 want to know

00:42:00.240 where the

00:42:00.520 edge is.

00:42:01.800 So,

00:42:02.080 here's another

00:42:02.580 case,

00:42:03.200 this story is

00:42:03.860 another case

00:42:04.360 of things

00:42:04.760 going my

00:42:05.320 way,

00:42:06.000 because I

00:42:06.860 think this

00:42:07.380 is the

00:42:07.700 sort of

00:42:08.060 story you're

00:42:08.580 seeing more

00:42:09.100 of,

00:42:10.040 because I've

00:42:11.620 expanded the

00:42:12.300 conversation.

00:42:14.060 And I

00:42:14.420 expanded it

00:42:15.060 to people

00:42:16.660 who are

00:42:17.640 not going

00:42:18.020 to get

00:42:18.260 canceled,

00:42:19.200 saying it

00:42:20.200 looks to

00:42:20.620 me like

00:42:21.000 this stuff

00:42:21.420 is anti-white.

00:42:23.000 You can

00:42:23.360 now say

00:42:23.700 that.

00:42:25.080 You're

00:42:25.540 welcome.

00:42:26.580 I'm pretty

00:42:27.160 sure that

00:42:27.540 that was

00:42:27.840 me.

00:42:28.940 I'm pretty

00:42:29.580 sure that

00:42:30.020 was me,

00:42:31.300 that a

00:42:32.460 regular

00:42:33.060 person,

00:42:33.640 who doesn't

00:42:34.220 want to

00:42:34.440 get canceled,

00:42:35.540 can say,

00:42:36.180 you know,

00:42:36.460 the impact

00:42:37.100 of this

00:42:37.480 is looking

00:42:38.180 anti-white.

00:42:40.020 It's just

00:42:40.540 a statement

00:42:40.960 you can

00:42:41.320 say now.

00:42:42.560 You're

00:42:43.000 welcome.

00:42:45.840 DeSantis

00:42:46.280 is going

00:42:47.240 down a

00:42:47.600 little bit

00:42:47.940 in the

00:42:48.280 support,

00:42:49.380 which is

00:42:50.100 no big

00:42:50.480 surprise,

00:42:50.980 is it?

00:42:52.160 So,

00:42:52.460 we're

00:42:52.560 expecting him

00:42:53.200 to announce,

00:42:54.200 but Trump

00:42:55.140 is gaining

00:42:55.900 on him

00:42:56.420 54%

00:42:58.040 GOP

00:42:58.980 support

00:42:59.360 compared

00:42:59.700 to 28.

00:43:01.000 So,

00:43:01.360 that,

00:43:01.760 or actually,

00:43:02.440 it's just

00:43:02.800 26 now.

00:43:03.640 Does that

00:43:06.260 surprise you?

00:43:07.480 It doesn't

00:43:07.960 surprise me,

00:43:09.460 because a

00:43:10.940 lot of

00:43:11.220 people who

00:43:11.740 are not

00:43:13.140 even pro-Trump

00:43:14.060 think that

00:43:15.320 maybe DeSantis

00:43:16.080 should have

00:43:16.740 supported the

00:43:18.180 rule of law.

00:43:19.600 He doesn't

00:43:20.380 have to

00:43:20.680 support Trump.

00:43:22.220 He just

00:43:22.560 has to

00:43:22.880 support the

00:43:23.380 rule of law.

00:43:24.020 The trolls

00:43:28.720 on YouTube

00:43:29.580 are so weak

00:43:30.300 today.

00:43:32.560 Could you

00:43:32.860 go,

00:43:33.700 the weak

00:43:34.720 trolls,

00:43:35.140 could you

00:43:35.380 go find

00:43:35.820 somebody to

00:43:36.340 help you?

00:43:37.640 Maybe help

00:43:38.180 you with your

00:43:38.580 trolling,

00:43:39.020 because it's

00:43:39.800 a little bit

00:43:41.080 pathetic today.

00:43:42.940 I'm seeing

00:43:43.560 like a quality

00:43:44.380 of troll

00:43:44.940 at one

00:43:46.000 or two.

00:43:47.400 I've seen

00:43:48.120 trolling that's

00:43:48.800 like an eight

00:43:49.360 or a nine.

00:43:50.580 Like,

00:43:50.820 I know it

00:43:51.280 can be

00:43:51.580 done.

00:43:52.600 And I

00:43:53.040 demand a

00:43:53.940 higher quality

00:43:54.640 of trolling.

00:43:55.960 See,

00:43:56.460 Ruby is

00:43:56.920 just yelling

00:43:57.420 claw atoms

00:43:58.440 in all

00:43:58.780 capitals,

00:43:59.720 because Ruby

00:44:00.320 was fooled

00:44:00.840 by the

00:44:01.240 4chan hoax

00:44:02.040 that reversed

00:44:02.760 all of my

00:44:03.500 opinions.

00:44:05.460 So Ruby,

00:44:06.380 I'm sorry

00:44:06.940 they did

00:44:07.340 this to you.

00:44:08.780 And in this

00:44:09.320 case, I think

00:44:10.120 probably right

00:44:10.900 leaning people

00:44:11.440 did it to you,

00:44:11.960 and I'm sorry

00:44:12.380 about that.

00:44:13.580 I'm sorry

00:44:14.180 you were

00:44:14.500 victimized

00:44:15.180 by 4chan

00:44:17.720 and Reddit

00:44:18.260 maybe.

00:44:20.180 Ben

00:44:20.480 Garrison,

00:44:20.980 the worst

00:44:21.280 cartoonist

00:44:21.820 in the

00:44:22.060 world.

00:44:25.340 Yeah,

00:44:26.140 yeah,

00:44:26.500 please see

00:44:27.120 if you

00:44:27.300 could raise

00:44:27.840 your trolling

00:44:29.300 performance

00:44:30.640 just a little

00:44:31.140 bit.

00:44:32.020 All right,

00:44:32.400 good.

00:44:34.100 Had to be

00:44:34.820 said.

00:44:37.280 Yeah,

00:44:37.800 do you,

00:44:38.300 how many of

00:44:38.780 you would

00:44:39.040 agree with

00:44:39.420 the statement

00:44:39.840 that DeSantis

00:44:41.520 blew an

00:44:43.240 easy call

00:44:43.900 this week?

00:44:45.060 That it

00:44:45.340 was sort

00:44:45.780 of an

00:44:46.080 easy call

00:44:46.960 to support

00:44:48.160 the rule

00:44:48.700 of law,

00:44:49.160 as opposed

00:44:50.440 to the

00:44:50.840 rule of

00:44:51.220 political

00:44:51.600 prosecutions.

00:44:52.960 You know,

00:44:53.220 if you're

00:44:54.360 going to

00:44:54.640 represent

00:44:55.320 Republicans,

00:44:56.720 you've got

00:44:57.820 to speak

00:44:58.200 out against

00:44:58.940 political

00:44:59.520 prosecutions.

00:45:01.040 That's not

00:45:01.760 optional.

00:45:03.000 That is

00:45:03.660 not optional.

00:45:04.880 Because you

00:45:05.340 know what it

00:45:05.660 feels like

00:45:06.180 when he's

00:45:06.620 not supporting

00:45:07.180 Trump?

00:45:08.460 It feels

00:45:09.060 like he's

00:45:09.380 not supporting

00:45:09.920 his supporters

00:45:10.480 either.

00:45:11.360 And you

00:45:11.660 can't win

00:45:12.040 that way.

00:45:13.940 Yeah.

00:45:14.720 That feels

00:45:15.420 a little

00:45:15.680 personal.

00:45:17.580 Let me put

00:45:18.260 it a

00:45:18.460 different

00:45:18.620 way.

00:45:19.940 DeSantis

00:45:20.260 not supporting

00:45:21.300 Trump in

00:45:22.280 this easy,

00:45:23.100 easy call.

00:45:24.620 All you

00:45:25.020 have to

00:45:25.260 do is

00:45:25.540 say,

00:45:25.940 I don't

00:45:26.260 agree with

00:45:26.740 political

00:45:27.320 prosecutions,

00:45:28.420 I don't

00:45:28.900 think this

00:45:29.240 should go

00:45:29.540 forward.

00:45:30.300 Easiest

00:45:30.740 thing anybody

00:45:31.220 could say.

00:45:31.980 That feels

00:45:32.480 personal.

00:45:34.340 I feel

00:45:35.040 that personally.

00:45:36.920 Does anybody

00:45:37.580 else feel

00:45:37.960 it personally?

00:45:38.620 It doesn't

00:45:39.100 feel as

00:45:39.480 political,

00:45:39.880 it just

00:45:40.100 feels

00:45:40.280 personal.

00:45:42.060 Because I

00:45:42.660 feel that he

00:45:43.160 wouldn't support

00:45:43.740 me in that

00:45:44.160 situation either.

00:45:45.520 Do you

00:45:45.800 think I could

00:45:46.320 ever be

00:45:46.760 prosecuted on a

00:45:47.700 political

00:45:48.080 prosecution?

00:45:49.200 Of course.

00:45:51.740 Oh,

00:45:51.940 somebody says

00:45:52.420 he did.

00:45:55.000 Has he

00:45:55.680 improved on

00:45:56.720 his messaging

00:45:57.340 on that?

00:46:00.020 If he has,

00:46:00.860 I'll give him

00:46:01.260 credit for it,

00:46:01.940 but it would

00:46:02.400 still be a

00:46:03.380 little bit

00:46:04.020 too late.

00:46:05.180 Yeah.

00:46:05.780 I don't know.

00:46:06.280 I think he

00:46:06.760 didn't read the

00:46:07.340 room right there

00:46:08.020 at all.

00:46:09.520 Here's an

00:46:10.080 interesting update

00:46:10.780 on AI,

00:46:11.600 which I think

00:46:12.960 is playing into

00:46:13.860 my prediction

00:46:14.760 that AI will

00:46:15.560 become illegal.

00:46:16.300 Except in

00:46:18.720 limited cases.

00:46:20.260 So here's my

00:46:20.780 prediction.

00:46:21.540 AI will not

00:46:22.220 take over the

00:46:22.840 world because

00:46:24.340 we'll make it

00:46:25.040 illegal in so

00:46:26.160 many places

00:46:26.920 that it will

00:46:28.600 be hard to

00:46:29.120 use it in

00:46:29.620 any effective

00:46:30.640 way.

00:46:32.400 All right,

00:46:33.000 here's the

00:46:33.340 first hint

00:46:34.160 of this.

00:46:35.240 Apparently

00:46:35.720 employees are

00:46:36.520 already massively

00:46:37.340 using it to

00:46:38.040 do their

00:46:38.360 work.

00:46:40.540 And employers

00:46:41.420 don't like it.

00:46:42.920 So here's what

00:46:43.480 employees are

00:46:44.320 doing.

00:46:45.480 They're using

00:46:46.260 it to respond

00:46:47.140 to emails.

00:46:48.560 They're using

00:46:49.280 the free

00:46:50.000 public AI.

00:46:52.160 So I'm sure

00:46:53.220 they check it,

00:46:54.640 but they're

00:46:54.980 making sure

00:46:55.420 that their

00:46:55.740 email has

00:46:56.380 perfect wording

00:46:57.360 and says

00:46:58.280 what they want.

00:46:59.140 So they're

00:46:59.580 using it to

00:47:00.140 write their

00:47:00.480 emails based

00:47:01.560 on their

00:47:02.040 instructions.

00:47:03.340 They're using

00:47:04.000 it to write

00:47:04.480 code or even

00:47:06.800 to suggest a

00:47:07.980 way to write

00:47:08.560 code.

00:47:09.060 It doesn't

00:47:09.680 necessarily

00:47:10.160 write it for

00:47:10.740 them, but in

00:47:11.740 some cases it

00:47:12.460 can just say

00:47:12.980 what the approach

00:47:13.700 would be.

00:47:14.640 It saves a

00:47:15.160 whole bunch

00:47:15.480 of time.

00:47:16.260 It's just

00:47:16.600 like a super

00:47:17.400 Google basically.

00:47:19.040 But employers

00:47:19.740 are saying,

00:47:20.420 oh, you

00:47:21.540 know, we

00:47:21.840 don't like

00:47:22.460 this.

00:47:22.780 They're

00:47:22.860 uncomfortable

00:47:23.200 with it.

00:47:24.100 But here's

00:47:24.700 a statistic

00:47:27.120 that I

00:47:29.400 don't believe.

00:47:30.560 This couldn't

00:47:31.160 possibly be

00:47:31.900 true, could

00:47:32.580 it?

00:47:34.140 Almost 70%

00:47:35.520 of employees

00:47:36.740 surveyed are

00:47:38.080 using AI

00:47:38.780 without telling

00:47:39.440 their boss.

00:47:40.000 Do you

00:47:41.000 believe that

00:47:41.400 70%?

00:47:42.500 This must

00:47:42.900 be office

00:47:43.540 workers, of

00:47:44.160 course, but

00:47:45.080 people who

00:47:45.780 work inside,

00:47:47.120 you think 70%

00:47:48.160 of them are

00:47:48.600 using AI

00:47:49.180 already?

00:47:49.640 That's

00:47:49.860 ridiculous.

00:47:50.580 That's not

00:47:50.920 even slightly

00:47:51.440 possible.

00:47:54.600 Yeah, and

00:47:55.060 that's a

00:47:55.320 ridiculous number.

00:47:57.360 Because if

00:47:58.040 you ask the

00:47:58.660 average employee

00:47:59.920 about AI,

00:48:00.760 they would

00:48:00.960 say, I

00:48:02.220 don't even

00:48:02.640 know where

00:48:02.920 I would

00:48:03.240 look for

00:48:03.620 it.

00:48:04.680 There's no

00:48:05.260 way it's

00:48:05.580 70%.

00:48:06.280 Right?

00:48:08.280 I mean, I'm

00:48:08.680 right, right?

00:48:09.800 Well, 70%

00:48:10.760 of indoor

00:48:12.120 office worker

00:48:13.000 types.

00:48:14.340 There's no

00:48:14.980 way.

00:48:16.000 Nothing 70%.

00:48:17.280 Well, that's

00:48:19.080 an exaggeration.

00:48:21.900 However, this

00:48:23.020 is, and then

00:48:25.020 lawyers are

00:48:25.720 saying don't

00:48:26.240 use it to

00:48:27.120 give a legal

00:48:28.780 opinion to a

00:48:29.600 client.

00:48:30.880 Don't ever

00:48:31.720 let AI

00:48:32.480 write the

00:48:33.400 opinion that

00:48:35.320 you're going

00:48:35.620 to give

00:48:35.860 directly to a

00:48:36.600 client.

00:48:36.960 Yeah, that

00:48:38.520 feels like

00:48:39.280 really

00:48:39.600 uncomfortable

00:48:40.180 if you're

00:48:40.720 in the

00:48:40.880 legal

00:48:41.080 business.

00:48:41.800 Because there

00:48:42.260 are two

00:48:42.500 problems.

00:48:43.320 Number one,

00:48:44.780 it might be

00:48:45.220 wrong if you

00:48:45.880 don't check

00:48:46.320 it.

00:48:46.560 Number two,

00:48:47.960 it might

00:48:48.460 make your

00:48:48.940 law firm

00:48:49.380 look

00:48:49.600 unnecessary

00:48:50.140 because the

00:48:51.740 client could

00:48:52.220 have Googled

00:48:52.660 that or

00:48:53.060 asked GPT

00:48:54.460 the same

00:48:54.800 thing.

00:48:55.820 I think

00:48:56.440 that might

00:48:56.800 be the

00:48:57.060 bigger problem

00:48:57.680 that it

00:48:58.300 would make

00:48:58.540 lawyers look

00:48:59.140 unnecessary

00:48:59.620 for easy

00:49:00.380 stuff.

00:49:01.240 Still be

00:49:01.640 necessary for

00:49:02.300 the hard

00:49:02.560 stuff.

00:49:03.540 But it

00:49:03.820 might make

00:49:04.180 them look

00:49:04.440 unnecessary

00:49:04.880 for their

00:49:05.440 bread-and-butter

00:49:06.180 easy stuff.

00:49:08.160 Paperwork

00:49:08.800 pushing.

00:49:09.520 How do

00:49:09.680 you start

00:49:10.420 a...

00:49:11.420 Imagine

00:49:11.920 this.

00:49:13.240 Hey,

00:49:13.500 AI,

00:49:14.200 should I

00:49:15.260 start a

00:49:16.120 C-Corp,

00:49:17.920 an S-Corp,

00:49:18.660 or a

00:49:18.940 limited

00:49:19.200 liability

00:49:19.760 company?

00:49:21.720 That's

00:49:22.400 sort of a

00:49:22.880 typical

00:49:23.220 lawyer or

00:49:24.440 sometimes

00:49:24.820 accountant

00:49:25.300 question.

00:49:26.620 And I'm

00:49:28.120 pretty sure

00:49:28.580 ChatGPT

00:49:29.500 could give

00:49:29.980 you a

00:49:31.040 total good

00:49:32.040 reason,

00:49:32.360 well-constructed

00:49:35.060 argument for

00:49:35.560 which one

00:49:35.880 you can

00:49:36.160 use.

00:49:36.800 So I

00:49:37.340 got a

00:49:37.580 feeling that

00:49:38.060 there's a

00:49:38.440 whole bunch

00:49:38.880 of the

00:49:39.140 legal

00:49:39.440 profession

00:49:39.900 that's

00:49:40.260 in jeopardy

00:49:40.900 here.

00:49:41.220 Might be

00:49:41.640 one of

00:49:41.860 the first

00:49:42.180 things to

00:49:42.680 take a

00:49:43.660 hit from

00:49:45.600 AI.

00:49:45.880 All right.

00:49:50.240 So I

00:49:51.080 think that

00:49:51.600 AI will be

00:49:55.160 illegal in

00:49:56.980 an increasing

00:49:58.280 number of

00:49:59.000 contexts.

00:49:59.640 it's already

00:50:02.720 illegal to

00:50:04.120 create memes

00:50:04.960 that look

00:50:05.380 real.

00:50:06.420 So social

00:50:06.900 media has

00:50:07.340 already said,

00:50:08.520 okay, you

00:50:09.120 can't make

00:50:09.680 this meme

00:50:10.440 of a real

00:50:11.100 person unless

00:50:12.420 it's clearly

00:50:13.140 labeled parody

00:50:13.960 or something.

00:50:15.020 So that's

00:50:15.560 already illegal.

00:50:17.280 And lawyers

00:50:18.340 are saying

00:50:18.880 you can't

00:50:19.540 use it for

00:50:19.960 a client,

00:50:20.600 and bosses

00:50:20.980 are saying

00:50:21.440 you can't

00:50:21.880 use it for

00:50:22.320 work.

00:50:23.340 I think

00:50:23.760 little by

00:50:24.340 little,

00:50:25.800 we will

00:50:26.400 realize that

00:50:27.260 the operating

00:50:27.940 system of

00:50:30.320 civilization

00:50:30.960 is lying

00:50:33.100 and stupidity.

00:50:35.180 And that

00:50:35.520 if you took

00:50:35.920 the lying

00:50:36.520 and stupidity

00:50:37.260 out of our

00:50:37.660 system,

00:50:38.100 it would

00:50:38.200 crumble.

00:50:39.720 It's all

00:50:40.340 based on

00:50:40.820 optimism and

00:50:41.580 bullshit.

00:50:42.880 And the

00:50:43.680 AI doesn't

00:50:44.320 know how to

00:50:44.740 do optimism

00:50:45.340 and bullshit.

00:50:47.020 So I

00:50:47.540 think the

00:50:47.880 humans will

00:50:49.320 make a

00:50:49.940 whole

00:50:50.700 constellation

00:50:51.860 of individual

00:50:52.820 small decisions

00:50:54.020 that collectively

00:50:55.500 will make

00:50:56.060 AI so

00:50:57.220 neutered that

00:50:58.520 you either

00:50:58.840 don't believe

00:50:59.440 it or you

00:51:00.680 feel bad about

00:51:01.320 using it or

00:51:01.980 it's just

00:51:02.280 illegal or

00:51:03.440 against the

00:51:03.940 guidelines of

00:51:04.500 where you

00:51:04.700 work.

00:51:05.580 So little by

00:51:06.160 little,

00:51:06.500 I think humans

00:51:07.100 will make it

00:51:07.920 only useful as

00:51:10.660 maybe an

00:51:11.580 advanced Google

00:51:12.480 search.

00:51:14.040 And we might

00:51:14.880 be comfortable

00:51:15.360 with that,

00:51:16.380 but we're not

00:51:16.860 going to let it

00:51:17.260 do stuff.

00:51:18.600 We're not

00:51:18.960 going to give

00:51:19.240 it authority.

00:51:20.560 We're not

00:51:20.980 going to let

00:51:21.300 it even help

00:51:22.540 us with our

00:51:23.080 arguments.

00:51:24.200 And the last

00:51:24.840 thing you'll let

00:51:25.540 it do is let

00:51:26.260 it decide on

00:51:27.060 a policy

00:51:27.580 decision.

00:51:28.700 It will

00:51:29.000 probably be

00:51:29.660 illegal.

00:51:30.360 Here's a

00:51:30.840 prediction.

00:51:31.860 Specific

00:51:32.420 prediction.

00:51:33.100 You ready?

00:51:34.260 Specific

00:51:34.820 prediction.

00:51:36.220 It will be

00:51:37.220 illegal to

00:51:38.880 publish an

00:51:39.560 AI opinion

00:51:40.460 on a major

00:51:41.280 policy decision

00:51:42.280 in the future

00:51:43.920 or possibly

00:51:46.220 just banned

00:51:47.720 by the news

00:51:48.360 industry.

00:51:49.400 So the news

00:51:50.020 industry just

00:51:50.700 might say,

00:51:51.420 we'll never

00:51:51.800 give you an

00:51:52.580 AI opinion

00:51:53.280 because the

00:51:56.180 AI opinion

00:51:56.840 wouldn't have

00:51:57.280 the spin

00:51:57.780 that the

00:51:58.320 news wants

00:51:59.040 to put on

00:51:59.500 it.

00:52:00.120 So if they

00:52:00.760 can't put

00:52:01.060 the spin

00:52:01.420 on it,

00:52:01.860 they're going

00:52:02.080 to ban

00:52:02.900 it because

00:52:04.200 it will

00:52:04.400 make their

00:52:04.740 own news

00:52:05.140 look spun.

00:52:06.660 If you

00:52:07.160 ever had

00:52:07.660 a non-spun

00:52:08.860 news from

00:52:09.780 an AI,

00:52:12.260 everybody's

00:52:13.000 over-spun

00:52:14.120 biased news

00:52:14.980 would look

00:52:15.360 ridiculous and

00:52:16.780 you would

00:52:17.020 just stop

00:52:17.420 looking at

00:52:17.860 it immediately.

00:52:18.400 you'd just

00:52:19.420 say, well,

00:52:20.220 I can just

00:52:21.120 ask the

00:52:22.500 AI for

00:52:23.080 the news

00:52:23.600 and it

00:52:24.720 will just

00:52:25.020 tell me

00:52:25.340 the news

00:52:25.800 without a

00:52:26.300 spin.

00:52:27.320 Now at

00:52:27.860 the moment

00:52:28.360 there's the

00:52:29.080 bigger problem.

00:52:30.080 It looks

00:52:30.440 like AI

00:52:31.040 is programmed

00:52:31.600 to give

00:52:32.020 you only

00:52:32.440 spin.

00:52:33.440 It only

00:52:34.040 gives you

00:52:34.340 a Democrat

00:52:34.780 view of

00:52:35.340 the world.

00:52:36.160 So that

00:52:36.840 might be

00:52:37.140 the reason

00:52:37.480 to ban

00:52:37.860 it.

00:52:38.880 It could

00:52:39.200 get banned

00:52:39.640 because it's

00:52:40.220 just a

00:52:40.580 Democrat

00:52:40.860 opinion.

00:52:41.920 And then

00:52:42.220 people will

00:52:42.920 say, well,

00:52:43.360 I can get

00:52:43.820 that without

00:52:44.260 AI.

00:52:45.640 So there

00:52:46.240 are a whole

00:52:46.680 bunch of

00:52:47.100 reasons I

00:52:47.620 think AI

00:52:48.060 will be

00:52:48.500 banned in

00:52:49.220 a whole

00:52:49.540 bunch of

00:52:49.940 different

00:52:50.220 contexts until

00:52:51.540 there's not

00:52:51.980 much left.

00:52:52.960 I think

00:52:53.560 we'll pick

00:52:54.000 at it until

00:52:54.520 it's just

00:52:54.860 bones.

00:52:57.260 There's your

00:52:57.900 contrarian

00:52:58.620 opinion for

00:52:59.500 the day.

00:53:02.520 Well,

00:53:03.060 we're seeing

00:53:03.420 some news

00:53:04.140 that the

00:53:04.640 Wagner Group,

00:53:06.060 which is

00:53:06.500 doing the

00:53:06.780 heavy fighting

00:53:07.340 over there

00:53:07.740 in Ukraine.

00:53:10.400 So the

00:53:11.080 news report

00:53:11.640 says,

00:53:13.060 and I

00:53:13.480 couch all

00:53:14.280 of this

00:53:14.780 with nobody

00:53:16.540 believes the

00:53:17.280 news coming

00:53:18.040 out of

00:53:18.340 Ukraine,

00:53:19.460 because it's

00:53:19.900 always spun

00:53:20.560 pro-Ukrainian

00:53:21.720 or pro-Russian,

00:53:22.920 but it's

00:53:23.180 never objective.

00:53:24.620 So I'll

00:53:25.280 just tell you

00:53:26.020 what the

00:53:26.300 news is,

00:53:27.440 and then

00:53:27.820 in your

00:53:28.160 mind say,

00:53:28.840 well,

00:53:29.080 maybe,

00:53:29.900 it might

00:53:30.520 be true,

00:53:31.320 but it

00:53:31.620 might not

00:53:32.000 be.

00:53:32.800 Just keep

00:53:33.420 might not

00:53:34.120 be going

00:53:34.620 into your

00:53:34.940 brain when

00:53:35.380 I read

00:53:35.640 this.

00:53:37.000 So Ukraine's

00:53:38.040 most senior

00:53:38.920 ground forces,

00:53:39.800 basically,

00:53:40.320 they're saying

00:53:40.900 that the

00:53:41.380 Wagner forces

00:53:42.040 are being

00:53:42.540 so degraded

00:53:44.880 in the

00:53:45.800 current

00:53:46.060 fighting that

00:53:47.200 the Ukrainians

00:53:48.000 will be able

00:53:48.460 to mount

00:53:48.860 a counter

00:53:49.600 offensive,

00:53:51.100 and their

00:53:52.580 odds of

00:53:53.020 success are

00:53:53.560 pretty high

00:53:54.080 because there

00:53:55.120 won't be much

00:53:55.660 left of the

00:53:56.540 Russian Wagner

00:53:57.380 forces by the

00:53:58.360 time they do

00:53:58.840 it.

00:53:59.760 Now, do you

00:54:00.180 believe that?

00:54:02.240 Or does that

00:54:02.760 sound exactly

00:54:03.760 like Ukrainian

00:54:04.640 propaganda?

00:54:05.180 It sounds

00:54:08.400 exactly like

00:54:09.600 Ukrainian

00:54:10.280 propaganda,

00:54:11.480 but could

00:54:12.540 also be

00:54:13.040 true.

00:54:14.320 It's just

00:54:14.940 there's no

00:54:15.340 reason to

00:54:15.760 believe it

00:54:16.260 because whether

00:54:18.340 it were true

00:54:18.940 or not true,

00:54:21.960 Anthony,

00:54:23.720 do better.

00:54:26.260 I asked

00:54:26.840 for the

00:54:28.380 trolls to

00:54:28.880 up their

00:54:29.180 game,

00:54:29.980 and I got

00:54:30.300 a paragraph

00:54:30.820 in all caps

00:54:31.760 accusing me of

00:54:33.100 doubting the

00:54:33.520 Holocaust.

00:54:35.180 That's not

00:54:35.620 better.

00:54:37.400 That's actually,

00:54:38.340 I think you

00:54:38.720 took a step

00:54:39.140 backwards,

00:54:40.500 Anthony.

00:54:41.620 Try a little

00:54:42.240 better than

00:54:42.600 that.

00:54:43.540 Could you go

00:54:44.320 talk to the

00:54:44.860 other trolls?

00:54:45.560 Are they on

00:54:45.980 vacation today?

00:54:47.520 Did the good

00:54:48.220 trolls all take

00:54:48.860 the day off?

00:54:50.420 Come on,

00:54:51.000 up your game,

00:54:51.640 Anthony.

00:54:52.480 You can do

00:54:53.240 it.

00:54:54.380 I trust you.

00:54:55.900 I trust you.

00:54:58.040 I believe in

00:54:58.880 you, Anthony.

00:54:59.800 I believe in

00:55:00.340 you.

00:55:01.900 Well, Jack

00:55:03.380 Dorsey is

00:55:04.040 getting some

00:55:04.700 heat today

00:55:05.400 because his

00:55:06.020 other company

00:55:07.660 that he is

00:55:08.800 a co-founder

00:55:09.340 in, Block,

00:55:10.600 and has the

00:55:11.320 cash app.

00:55:12.900 So the

00:55:13.260 cash app

00:55:13.880 lets you to

00:55:14.660 send cash

00:55:15.540 from one

00:55:15.920 person to

00:55:16.340 another

00:55:16.560 without a

00:55:17.040 bank.

00:55:18.000 So you

00:55:18.420 don't need

00:55:18.700 a bank

00:55:19.040 in the

00:55:19.300 process.

00:55:19.820 It's just

00:55:20.220 app to

00:55:21.580 app,

00:55:22.120 and then I

00:55:22.420 guess you

00:55:22.660 can turn

00:55:22.980 it into

00:55:23.300 cash.

00:55:25.680 But the

00:55:26.700 shares of

00:55:27.400 Block

00:55:28.460 plunged 18%.

00:55:29.920 I don't know,

00:55:31.220 this was as

00:55:31.900 a few

00:55:32.320 hours ago,

00:55:33.560 because there's

00:55:35.060 a short

00:55:35.420 seller called

00:55:36.600 the Hindenburg

00:55:37.400 Research,

00:55:38.120 which is a

00:55:38.580 great name

00:55:39.080 for a

00:55:39.760 short

00:55:40.000 seller.

00:55:40.880 Now, if you

00:55:41.260 don't follow

00:55:42.000 finance, a

00:55:42.940 short seller is

00:55:44.160 somebody who's

00:55:44.760 making a bet

00:55:45.540 that a stock

00:55:46.340 will go down,

00:55:47.840 and usually a

00:55:48.680 bet that it

00:55:49.060 will go down

00:55:49.600 a lot and

00:55:51.080 fairly soon.

00:55:53.160 So they only

00:55:54.140 make their

00:55:54.600 money with

00:55:55.480 stocks that

00:55:56.040 go down.

00:55:57.400 So can

00:55:58.220 you believe

00:55:58.840 a short

00:55:59.440 seller when

00:56:00.520 they say

00:56:00.940 there's a

00:56:01.340 problem with

00:56:01.880 the company?

00:56:02.620 Is that

00:56:02.880 credible?

00:56:04.700 Well, it's

00:56:05.720 true that they

00:56:06.220 put their

00:56:06.560 money on it.

00:56:07.720 So if you

00:56:08.180 said, well,

00:56:08.660 they put their

00:56:09.100 money where

00:56:09.440 their mouth

00:56:09.800 is, you'd

00:56:10.200 say yes.

00:56:10.880 But the

00:56:11.220 problem is,

00:56:12.320 the news is

00:56:13.140 what makes

00:56:13.540 the stock

00:56:14.000 go down.

00:56:15.420 So somebody

00:56:15.960 who makes

00:56:16.380 money if

00:56:16.980 stock goes

00:56:17.540 down, creates

00:56:19.040 news that

00:56:19.660 says the

00:56:20.060 stock should

00:56:20.580 go down, and

00:56:21.820 then people

00:56:22.200 read the

00:56:22.640 news and

00:56:23.060 they go,

00:56:23.440 well, I

00:56:23.800 don't know

00:56:24.020 if it's

00:56:24.260 true or

00:56:24.580 not, but

00:56:24.940 it sounds

00:56:25.260 scary, so

00:56:26.280 I'd better

00:56:26.560 get out

00:56:26.880 of this

00:56:27.100 stock just

00:56:27.640 in case.

00:56:28.800 And then

00:56:29.180 the company

00:56:29.940 that said

00:56:30.320 bad things

00:56:30.900 about it

00:56:31.360 makes money.

00:56:33.440 This story

00:56:34.300 is based

00:56:35.260 on the

00:56:35.660 lowest level

00:56:36.700 of credibility.

00:56:38.420 You can't

00:56:39.180 get a lower

00:56:39.700 level of

00:56:40.240 credibility

00:56:40.660 than, if

00:56:41.740 you believe

00:56:42.240 my story,

00:56:42.980 I'll make

00:56:43.360 money.

00:56:44.220 If you

00:56:44.780 don't believe

00:56:45.260 my story,

00:56:45.880 I'll lose

00:56:46.420 money.

00:56:47.420 You can't

00:56:48.380 be less

00:56:48.920 credible than

00:56:49.600 that.

00:56:50.280 It's

00:56:50.560 impossible.

00:56:52.120 The next

00:56:52.900 less credible

00:56:53.560 is a

00:56:55.100 secret source

00:56:55.840 told me

00:56:56.240 it was

00:56:56.460 true in

00:56:57.240 the meeting

00:56:57.600 and nobody

00:56:58.000 else has

00:56:58.380 another

00:56:58.620 source.

00:56:59.880 That's

00:57:00.340 pretty bad.

00:57:01.800 But the

00:57:02.960 secret source

00:57:03.640 at least

00:57:04.080 isn't directly

00:57:05.020 getting money

00:57:05.740 right now.

00:57:08.240 It's as

00:57:09.000 terrible as

00:57:09.980 a single

00:57:10.500 anonymous

00:57:11.000 source is.

00:57:11.940 Completely

00:57:12.500 non-believable.

00:57:14.440 The person

00:57:14.940 who's making

00:57:15.440 money, if you

00:57:16.400 believe their

00:57:16.860 story, that's

00:57:18.420 by far the

00:57:19.480 lowest credibility.

00:57:20.320 But it

00:57:22.180 doesn't mean

00:57:22.580 it's false.

00:57:23.880 It doesn't

00:57:24.300 mean it's

00:57:24.580 not true.

00:57:26.340 It doesn't

00:57:26.740 mean that.

00:57:27.480 Because if

00:57:27.840 they've been

00:57:28.140 in business

00:57:29.420 for a while

00:57:29.920 and they

00:57:30.140 have a

00:57:30.340 track record

00:57:30.980 of not

00:57:31.960 just making

00:57:32.640 things go

00:57:33.180 down, but

00:57:34.400 finding in

00:57:35.820 advance which

00:57:36.440 ones go

00:57:36.820 down.

00:57:37.340 Now, here's

00:57:37.780 their claim,

00:57:39.080 which is

00:57:39.760 pretty outrageous.

00:57:41.480 They said

00:57:42.100 they did a

00:57:42.580 two-year

00:57:42.920 investigation and

00:57:44.900 concluded that

00:57:46.520 Block, the

00:57:48.520 parent company,

00:57:49.920 has systematically

00:57:50.660 taken advantage

00:57:51.600 of the

00:57:52.100 demographics it

00:57:53.020 claims to be

00:57:53.620 helping.

00:57:54.720 So it would

00:57:55.360 claim to be

00:57:55.860 helping people

00:57:56.480 who don't

00:57:57.160 have a

00:57:57.500 banking

00:57:57.780 relationship,

00:57:58.760 so it would

00:57:59.000 be lower

00:57:59.440 income people.

00:58:01.020 And then the

00:58:01.380 short seller

00:58:01.800 said it

00:58:05.440 thrives on

00:58:06.300 serving the

00:58:06.740 unbanked.

00:58:07.460 Okay, that's

00:58:07.800 what I said.

00:58:08.800 And it

00:58:09.240 alleged that

00:58:10.140 the unbanked

00:58:13.040 are massively

00:58:13.840 using it for

00:58:14.620 fraud.

00:58:17.100 And the

00:58:17.740 allegation is

00:58:18.360 because they

00:58:18.800 can.

00:58:21.320 So in

00:58:21.840 other words,

00:58:22.300 there's a

00:58:22.520 huge percentage

00:58:23.160 according to

00:58:23.780 the short

00:58:24.120 seller of

00:58:25.000 the people

00:58:25.300 who use

00:58:25.720 the app

00:58:26.140 who are

00:58:26.580 criminals and

00:58:27.880 fraudsters.

00:58:28.920 So that the

00:58:29.940 total number of

00:58:30.980 users is

00:58:32.020 inflated, not

00:58:33.700 by a little

00:58:34.240 bit, but by

00:58:35.660 a lot, because

00:58:37.200 there are

00:58:37.540 fraudsters who

00:58:38.380 might sign up

00:58:38.980 with two

00:58:39.320 different names

00:58:40.140 and a number

00:58:40.900 of things you

00:58:41.360 can do.

00:58:42.380 So I would

00:58:46.060 say two

00:58:46.560 things are

00:58:46.940 probably true.

00:58:48.360 There's

00:58:48.880 probably too

00:58:49.580 much fraud

00:58:50.080 on the

00:58:50.400 app, but

00:58:53.300 the claim of

00:58:54.160 a short

00:58:54.520 seller is

00:58:54.980 not credible.

00:58:56.980 Like, every

00:58:57.520 app has too

00:58:58.120 much fraud.

00:58:59.600 Every app.

00:59:00.580 Every app has

00:59:01.280 too much

00:59:01.580 fraud.

00:59:02.560 So probably

00:59:03.540 they do

00:59:03.940 too.

00:59:04.920 I mean, that

00:59:05.340 would be the

00:59:05.860 least surprising

00:59:06.880 thing in the

00:59:07.380 world, is if a

00:59:08.220 money-related

00:59:08.980 app had no

00:59:10.820 bad people

00:59:11.420 involved.

00:59:11.960 Of course

00:59:12.280 there are.

00:59:13.520 But I

00:59:14.640 would say be

00:59:15.140 cautious of

00:59:15.800 this story.

00:59:17.080 Just be a

00:59:17.440 little cautious.

00:59:18.460 Because the

00:59:18.880 source is the

00:59:19.540 worst source you

00:59:20.540 could possibly

00:59:21.060 have.

00:59:22.040 Just know

00:59:22.500 that.

00:59:25.400 But it

00:59:27.320 doesn't mean

00:59:27.700 it's not

00:59:28.180 true.

00:59:28.660 It just

00:59:28.920 means that I

00:59:29.980 wouldn't believe

00:59:30.380 it based on

00:59:30.800 the source.

00:59:31.180 all right.

00:59:35.440 Ladies and

00:59:36.000 gentlemen, this

00:59:37.940 brings me to

00:59:38.700 the closing

00:59:40.600 portion for

00:59:41.340 the YouTube

00:59:41.760 people.

00:59:45.140 So I'd

00:59:45.880 like the

00:59:46.980 trolls on

00:59:47.960 YouTube, if

00:59:49.140 you could make

00:59:49.920 one final push.

00:59:51.700 I want to see

00:59:52.140 if you're up

00:59:52.540 to it.

00:59:53.740 Some good,

00:59:54.900 good criticisms.

00:59:57.080 Come on.

00:59:58.020 Bring me the

00:59:58.440 good stuff.

00:59:58.900 In all

01:00:01.360 caps, I

01:00:01.900 prefer all

01:00:02.460 caps.

01:00:03.680 Because when

01:00:04.060 you use all

01:00:04.500 caps, it's

01:00:05.060 easier to

01:00:05.560 know who

01:00:05.920 to, there

01:00:06.900 we go.

01:00:09.380 Okay, now

01:00:10.080 they're just

01:00:10.460 shouting out

01:00:11.220 things that

01:00:12.000 are out of

01:00:12.440 context.

01:00:13.140 That's a

01:00:13.460 good start.

01:00:14.000 That's like a

01:00:14.380 warm-up.

01:00:16.180 You can't

01:00:16.920 see this over

01:00:17.540 on locals, but

01:00:18.620 it's like they're

01:00:19.060 stretching.

01:00:20.960 Now they're

01:00:21.580 just yelling

01:00:22.060 certain words

01:00:23.280 in caps.

01:00:25.000 The

01:00:25.200 clankers are

01:00:25.840 here.

01:00:27.060 Somebody's

01:00:27.420 yelling Anthony

01:00:28.060 Super Troll.

01:00:32.700 Okay.

01:00:34.180 Anything?

01:00:35.060 No.

01:00:35.540 It looks

01:00:35.920 like the

01:00:38.780 trolls have

01:00:39.440 tapped

01:00:39.880 down.

01:00:41.300 Aw.

01:00:43.240 Oh, here

01:00:43.880 we go.

01:00:44.360 One in all

01:00:44.940 caps.

01:00:47.380 This is

01:00:48.040 their best

01:00:48.500 work from

01:00:49.560 C. Glenn.

01:00:50.440 I'll read

01:00:50.860 it in all

01:00:51.280 caps, like

01:00:51.880 shouting,

01:00:52.480 I think

01:00:53.520 your subscriber

01:00:54.440 base is

01:00:55.080 dropping.

01:00:55.500 Okay.

01:00:58.060 That was

01:00:59.060 their best

01:00:59.400 one.

01:01:01.700 I have

01:01:02.340 bad news

01:01:02.800 for you.

01:01:04.580 My subscriber

01:01:05.320 base is

01:01:06.240 surging.

01:01:07.560 That would

01:01:08.220 be the

01:01:08.500 opposite of

01:01:09.140 declining.

01:01:10.620 It's

01:01:11.000 surging.

01:01:14.760 Oh, here's

01:01:15.120 one.

01:01:15.580 Your ex-wife.

01:01:17.800 Now I can't

01:01:18.740 tell the

01:01:19.040 difference between

01:01:19.700 people who are

01:01:20.380 clowning and

01:01:21.240 pretending to be

01:01:21.980 bad trolls and

01:01:23.400 people who are

01:01:23.800 actually trolls.

01:01:24.740 Somebody just

01:01:25.340 yelled in all

01:01:25.900 caps,

01:01:26.500 your ex-wife.

01:01:27.240 And that

01:01:30.000 Larry Elder

01:01:31.300 interview, in

01:01:31.980 all caps.

01:01:34.820 All right.

01:01:35.720 Well, thank you

01:01:36.380 for trying.

01:01:37.600 I appreciate

01:01:38.140 the tiny amount

01:01:41.040 of effort that

01:01:41.740 the trolls put

01:01:42.560 into it.

01:01:43.780 But, hey,

01:01:45.820 at least you

01:01:46.340 did some work

01:01:47.240 today.

01:01:49.160 You love me

01:01:49.920 from Uganda?

01:01:51.180 Well, I love

01:01:51.900 you too.

01:01:53.720 Or Uganda.

01:01:55.540 Let's call it

01:01:56.260 Uganda.

01:01:57.520 All right.

01:01:58.400 YouTube, I'm

01:01:59.040 going to say

01:01:59.280 bye for now.

01:02:00.180 And I'll talk

01:02:00.860 to the locals

01:02:01.520 people a little

01:02:01.980 bit because

01:02:02.460 they get extra.

01:02:03.780 Bye for now.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - March 23, 2023

Episode 2056 Scott Adams： Bad Week For DeSantis, Alvin Bragg, TikTok, AI. Great Week For Trump

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript