Real Coffee with Scott Adams - April 01, 2023


Episode 2065 Scott Adams: Twitter Ranking Formula, Tate Brothers Released, Trump Arraignment, Trans


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 16 minutes

Words per minute

137.73474

Word count

10,525

Sentence count

231

Harmful content

Misogyny

28

sentences flagged

Hate speech

26

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

The Tate Brothers have been released from prison, but they are still under house arrest. I talk about why this is a good thing, and what to watch for when they get out of jail. I also talk about the upcoming Trump arraignment, and why I'm endorsing Joe Biden for president in 2024.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of civilization.
00:00:05.240 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and there's never been a finer experience.
00:00:11.320 If you're starting to tingle, that's why.
00:00:14.320 And if you'd like to take that tingle up to a full-blown throb,
00:00:18.640 all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or chalice or stein,
00:00:22.300 a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:26.200 Fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:00:29.040 I like coffee.
00:00:30.660 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.
00:00:32.980 It's the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better.
00:00:36.080 It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.
00:00:39.740 Go.
00:00:44.800 Ah.
00:00:47.560 Well, I'd like to start with an announcement.
00:00:52.880 Given the upcoming arraignment of ex-president Trump,
00:00:58.920 and because of his legal troubles, I'm changing my endorsement to Joe Biden.
00:01:07.660 Joe Biden.
00:01:09.180 So 2024, Biden.
00:01:12.160 Joe Biden.
00:01:14.060 Biden.
00:01:14.660 Biden.
00:01:15.080 Biden.
00:01:15.660 Biden.
00:01:17.660 Biden.
00:01:18.340 April Fool's.
00:01:21.480 April Fool's.
00:01:22.080 April Fool's.
00:01:23.480 All right.
00:01:25.020 All right.
00:01:25.100 I am trying today a new experiment that should garner us the most number of viewers ever.
00:01:34.800 I'm using the new, newly disclosed rules of Twitter's algorithm.
00:01:41.280 Well, the rules of what tweets get boosted to cleverly boost my tweet today using the new rules that have just been disclosed.
00:01:52.580 We'll talk about that in detail.
00:01:54.660 But watch the number count.
00:01:56.660 If I've correctly gamed the system, it'll be more people than we've ever had before.
00:02:02.680 Because the tweet will be more visible, I think.
00:02:05.880 We'll talk about that later.
00:02:07.580 Well, here's some big news.
00:02:09.480 The Tate brothers have been released from prison, but they're still in house arrest, I guess.
00:02:14.420 And here's what I have to say about it.
00:02:19.100 Now, you probably know I'm not a fan of the Tate brothers, mostly Andrew Tate.
00:02:25.340 I have a personal beef with him, but his story is interesting.
00:02:30.120 So I'm going to talk about it anyway.
00:02:32.760 And what I realized was he has the most interesting business model.
00:02:36.760 I tweeted about this.
00:02:38.600 Just think about Andrew Tate's business model.
00:02:40.900 According to his accusers, he taught women how to exploit men online,
00:02:47.540 while also teaching men how to avoid being exploited by women online and in general,
00:02:53.980 while also teaching men that it's easy to make money.
00:02:59.120 And he made money doing all three.
00:03:01.740 He made money teaching women how to scam men, 1.00
00:03:06.160 men how to avoid being scammed,
00:03:08.020 and then men how to make money easily.
00:03:13.140 And he did all three of them.
00:03:15.820 Apparently, he made money on all three.
00:03:18.800 That is the tightest business model I've ever seen.
00:03:21.700 I'm not saying you should, you know, emulate him.
00:03:25.580 I'm not saying he's a good person.
00:03:28.060 I'm just saying that's a hell of a business model.
00:03:31.140 That's all.
00:03:32.020 That's all I have to say about that.
00:03:34.160 But here's the interesting part.
00:03:36.080 If the Tates are on house arrest, will that allow them to do public media?
00:03:43.920 In other words, will he go back to live streaming as soon as he gets air cut?
00:03:50.280 I don't know.
00:03:51.420 So here's what you want to watch for with the Tates.
00:03:54.360 I don't know what they've done, if anything.
00:03:57.600 So I'm not personally aware of any crimes,
00:04:00.640 but they've been accused of quite bad things.
00:04:03.260 So while we don't know if those are real charges or trumped-up charges or what they are,
00:04:10.080 here's the interesting part of the story.
00:04:12.700 As I've told you before, Andrew Tate is very persuasive.
00:04:17.020 He has the actual tools of persuasion.
00:04:19.540 And as soon as he got out of jail,
00:04:22.000 as soon as he can talk,
00:04:25.260 it's going to change things.
00:04:26.660 In other words, we're going to get to see how capable he is.
00:04:32.900 Because I suspect there are some real legal risks here.
00:04:37.000 And if he can get out of them,
00:04:39.380 it will be quite a show.
00:04:41.040 I have to admit, it would be a hell of a show
00:04:43.140 if he somehow gets out of all of his legal problems.
00:04:46.360 But I think there's a chance.
00:04:48.900 I think there's actually a chance
00:04:50.420 he'll actually get away with everything.
00:04:52.540 Or maybe he didn't do anything.
00:04:54.480 That's technically illegal.
00:04:55.920 I don't know.
00:04:57.060 He certainly is accused of things that sound pretty heinous.
00:05:00.380 But I'm going to be watching this
00:05:02.600 both from a legal perspective,
00:05:05.440 but also just to see if his toolbox
00:05:07.940 is sufficient to get him out of this.
00:05:11.140 If it is, he's going to come back stronger.
00:05:14.460 And that would be interesting.
00:05:16.680 Because I do believe he is a risk to the system.
00:05:20.220 Would you agree with that?
00:05:21.880 I think he's a risk to the whole system.
00:05:24.420 Because the things he's saying are often provocative
00:05:28.540 and you can have your own opinions
00:05:30.880 about the ethics of it and all that.
00:05:33.280 But there is a certain truth to it
00:05:36.120 that is very disturbing to people
00:05:38.940 who don't want you to know those truths.
00:05:41.380 It's pretty interesting.
00:05:42.420 Here's my question.
00:05:47.040 There's a lot of news about these drag shows,
00:05:50.100 not only for children,
00:05:51.380 but for a lot of public officials and stuff.
00:05:54.280 A lot of drag shows.
00:05:56.080 And it made me wonder,
00:05:57.980 how many forms of live entertainment
00:06:00.220 are there for school children?
00:06:03.680 Because I was trying to think,
00:06:05.320 why is it that if you asked me to list
00:06:07.360 all of the live entertainment options
00:06:10.200 for school children,
00:06:11.620 I would only be able to think of one?
00:06:14.920 Well, you've got your trans activist dancing.
00:06:19.680 That's one.
00:06:21.220 What would be the second one?
00:06:25.060 No, I mean, that doesn't involve children.
00:06:28.140 You know, because children put on their own plays.
00:06:30.100 But what would be the...
00:06:31.500 What's the other one?
00:06:32.840 And why can't I name one?
00:06:33.920 And I'm wondering,
00:06:35.680 is it possible that there's also live entertainment
00:06:38.260 that would feature Republican men
00:06:41.540 dancing with traditional wives,
00:06:45.420 you know, in traditional, like, 50s garb?
00:06:49.780 Probably there is, right?
00:06:51.120 But I'm guessing that they don't get much attention
00:06:53.140 because they don't dance as well.
00:06:55.300 Probably.
00:06:55.980 They're probably just bad dancers, 0.95
00:06:57.360 so you don't hear about them.
00:06:58.980 Now, one of the things that impressed me
00:07:00.580 about the trans entertainers
00:07:02.420 is that they seem to get...
00:07:06.420 They have no problem getting booked for gigs,
00:07:08.660 apparently,
00:07:09.360 because we keep seeing video of them.
00:07:11.600 But other forms of dancing...
00:07:15.060 Correct me if I'm wrong.
00:07:16.100 I'm not really, like,
00:07:18.040 you know, big on the arts.
00:07:20.500 But most form of dancing,
00:07:22.160 don't you follow sort of a set pattern of movement?
00:07:25.520 Is that wrong?
00:07:27.240 Well, because the trans have a whole different way 1.00
00:07:30.320 of entertaining,
00:07:31.320 which apparently is very successful.
00:07:33.540 And I've been trying to learn how they do it.
00:07:37.360 And it looks freestyle.
00:07:40.460 Yeah, it's freestyle.
00:07:41.520 And I was wondering how hard it is.
00:07:44.300 So I thought I'd give you a little dance performance.
00:07:48.180 It's something I've learned from the trans community.
00:07:50.260 I'm not pretending to be trans.
00:07:52.120 That would be...
00:07:53.280 What would that be?
00:07:54.300 That would be called...
00:07:56.380 Cultural... 0.93
00:07:58.260 Something?
00:07:59.440 So I'm not doing that.
00:08:00.560 I'm just trying to learn from them
00:08:02.200 and pick up the tricks.
00:08:03.600 Because I was watching one of the trans dancers,
00:08:06.260 and it doesn't seem like there's too much to it.
00:08:10.800 I think I could probably...
00:08:12.880 A little stretching first.
00:08:15.620 All right.
00:08:16.160 All right, so I'm not pretending to be trans.
00:08:19.780 Not pretending to be trans. 1.00
00:08:21.900 I'm only learning from their technique.
00:08:23.800 All right, so I'm not pretending to be trans.
00:08:23.840 I'm only learning from their technique.
00:08:46.160 I think that was pretty good.
00:09:00.340 If you're listening to this...
00:09:02.480 Oh, damn it.
00:09:06.140 Damn it.
00:09:11.660 Sorry, locals.
00:09:12.680 I didn't notice my laptop fell over.
00:09:16.160 You're going to have to...
00:09:17.680 You're going to have to watch it on YouTube
00:09:20.520 or in replay.
00:09:22.320 On YouTube.
00:09:24.900 Whew.
00:09:27.160 Now,
00:09:28.320 I can kind of see how the kids like it.
00:09:34.120 It doesn't have rules.
00:09:36.360 Kids like that.
00:09:39.200 All right.
00:09:39.820 All right.
00:09:42.440 So I wonder what kind of live entertainment
00:09:44.840 would also be allowed.
00:09:45.920 Do you think if the military
00:09:47.280 had a dance troupe
00:09:50.080 that the military dance troupe
00:09:53.060 would be invited?
00:09:55.400 How about if police
00:09:56.780 had some kind of a cappella group?
00:10:01.740 Do you think the school children
00:10:03.100 would invite them to perform?
00:10:06.540 I don't know.
00:10:07.840 Or is it really the trans community
00:10:10.260 are the only ones
00:10:12.820 providing any live entertainment?
00:10:14.360 I don't know.
00:10:18.080 Anyway,
00:10:18.520 so AI has been banned in Italy.
00:10:23.220 Italy banned AI.
00:10:25.600 Specifically,
00:10:26.280 chat GPT,
00:10:28.000 open AI,
00:10:28.840 whatever it is.
00:10:30.100 And their problem was data security.
00:10:32.060 But I think it's the beginning.
00:10:37.700 I think I'm the only one predicting this.
00:10:40.980 Two predictions about AI.
00:10:43.920 Number one,
00:10:44.880 it will never be smart.
00:10:47.200 It will be an idiot savant.
00:10:50.220 And what I mean by that
00:10:51.320 is that it will do some things
00:10:52.800 extraordinarily well,
00:10:54.120 like play chess,
00:10:55.800 write code,
00:10:56.900 do math.
00:10:57.540 It's going to do some savant stuff
00:10:59.980 like really,
00:11:00.640 really well.
00:11:02.260 But it will never be smart
00:11:04.120 in a conversational way.
00:11:07.560 Because it can't be smarter than people.
00:11:11.320 I don't see any scenario
00:11:12.920 in which it can study people,
00:11:15.980 learn from people,
00:11:17.120 and then become
00:11:18.440 a super intelligence.
00:11:22.280 Have you ever wondered
00:11:23.320 about how that works?
00:11:26.280 I know you disagree.
00:11:27.460 And most people would.
00:11:30.220 So I'm basically,
00:11:31.220 I'm basically saying something
00:11:33.200 that I assume most people disagree.
00:11:36.300 My statement is
00:11:37.740 that except for those few
00:11:39.420 like STEM related,
00:11:41.640 very rule-based things,
00:11:44.580 like chess is rules-based,
00:11:46.380 programming is rules-based,
00:11:48.460 math is rules-based.
00:11:49.980 So once you get outside
00:11:51.100 of the rules-based scenario,
00:11:54.260 the only way that we train AI
00:11:56.340 is on humans.
00:11:59.240 If a human would say this,
00:12:01.420 then the AI will say it.
00:12:03.220 And there's no way
00:12:04.260 you can train something
00:12:05.680 to be super smart
00:12:07.000 by giving it infinite examples
00:12:09.900 of idiocy. 0.71
00:12:11.660 There's no amount of stupid
00:12:13.640 you could put into it
00:12:14.640 to make it smart.
00:12:15.500 And that is actually the plan.
00:12:18.860 The plan is if you add
00:12:20.260 enough stupidity
00:12:21.320 into a database,
00:12:23.440 the net effect will be
00:12:24.840 super intelligence.
00:12:27.620 Am I making that up?
00:12:30.140 That's real, right?
00:12:33.120 Am I just completely ignorant
00:12:35.700 about what AI is?
00:12:37.380 Or am I saying something
00:12:38.460 that's so obvious
00:12:39.600 that how else could it go?
00:12:43.180 So AI can't be more than
00:12:46.820 a bigoted, biased, stupid 0.64
00:12:51.120 personality.
00:12:54.020 But it will have some skills.
00:12:56.660 Its personality would just be
00:12:58.100 freaking idiot
00:12:58.900 because it's going to be
00:12:59.980 based on people.
00:13:01.320 Now, if it's not an idiot,
00:13:03.360 how could it not be an idiot?
00:13:05.320 Well, one way would be
00:13:08.280 if the smart people
00:13:09.460 who developed it
00:13:10.400 gave it limitations
00:13:12.140 and said,
00:13:13.560 all right,
00:13:14.320 you're not going to be allowed
00:13:15.720 to say anything
00:13:16.720 that QAnon says
00:13:18.020 or anything that Antifa says.
00:13:20.620 Black Lives Matter is fine
00:13:24.160 and we love trans community
00:13:26.800 and basically you're just
00:13:29.980 going to get one person's
00:13:31.200 or some small group
00:13:32.260 of people's opinion
00:13:33.180 of what is good
00:13:33.920 and what is bad.
00:13:35.720 So your best case scenario
00:13:37.200 is that AI is like
00:13:38.380 the few people who created it
00:13:40.100 because they limit
00:13:41.540 what it can and cannot do
00:13:42.720 or it's just stupid
00:13:44.560 because it's some average
00:13:46.500 of stupid people. 0.86
00:13:47.360 So it's either going to be
00:13:52.300 illegal or stupid
00:13:53.480 but really good at math
00:13:55.700 and a few technical things
00:13:58.100 that are useful.
00:14:01.520 You think AI is running the show?
00:14:04.020 I don't.
00:14:05.480 I don't.
00:14:06.880 Yeah, I've lost all faith in AI.
00:14:10.000 Isn't that weird?
00:14:11.460 It's supposed to be going
00:14:12.360 in the other direction
00:14:13.080 where I'm supposed to be
00:14:14.040 wowed by its capabilities.
00:14:15.500 I'm absolutely convinced
00:14:18.020 it's useless
00:14:18.620 except for rules-based things
00:14:22.200 where it can be very smart.
00:14:25.180 Yeah.
00:14:25.760 Now it might be
00:14:26.820 like an interesting companion
00:14:28.140 just because it's stupid. 0.68
00:14:30.100 You know, you think
00:14:30.900 oh, that's just like a person.
00:14:32.820 But I don't think
00:14:33.860 we're going to put up
00:14:34.560 with stupidity in machines.
00:14:36.660 We barely put up
00:14:38.060 with stupidity in other humans.
00:14:40.660 It's going to be
00:14:41.420 real hard to take
00:14:42.240 if your machine
00:14:42.920 starts acting dumb
00:14:43.920 in front of you.
00:14:44.500 It's like,
00:14:45.200 ah, I'm paying for you.
00:14:47.020 I don't want to pay
00:14:47.880 for you to say dumb stuff
00:14:49.020 right in front of me.
00:14:51.600 You know,
00:14:51.840 if you're a Republican
00:14:53.560 maybe you don't get along
00:14:54.740 with Democrats
00:14:55.460 but do you want to sit
00:14:56.860 in the same room
00:14:57.540 for a long period of time
00:14:58.720 talking about politics?
00:15:01.500 Probably not.
00:15:02.580 No.
00:15:03.060 So you're either
00:15:03.580 going to make
00:15:04.000 your version of AI
00:15:05.820 let's say your personal
00:15:07.020 one you're using
00:15:07.760 you're either going to make it
00:15:09.080 follow your personality
00:15:10.400 which seems likely.
00:15:12.460 you're not going to make it
00:15:14.220 opposite of your opinions
00:15:15.780 or you wouldn't pay for it
00:15:17.720 or you wouldn't talk to it.
00:15:20.200 I know.
00:15:21.000 I've got a feeling
00:15:21.520 that everything we predict
00:15:22.720 about AI is wrong.
00:15:25.680 Which, by the way,
00:15:26.700 is the universal
00:15:27.620 smartest opinion
00:15:29.580 on anything new.
00:15:30.720 that's kind of cheating.
00:15:34.280 You can take anything
00:15:35.380 that's brand new
00:15:36.120 and complicated
00:15:36.720 and you can just say
00:15:38.420 I've got a prediction
00:15:39.580 that in 10 years
00:15:41.480 our view about this
00:15:43.240 new and complicated thing
00:15:44.700 will be very different
00:15:46.080 than it is right now.
00:15:47.720 And you would be right
00:15:48.800 every time.
00:15:50.940 Right?
00:15:51.440 So if you just took
00:15:52.920 everything we think
00:15:54.060 about AI at the moment
00:15:55.460 it's probably all wrong.
00:15:58.080 It's probably all wrong.
00:15:59.580 We just own
00:16:00.660 what is right.
00:16:03.600 But we should treat it
00:16:04.880 like we do know
00:16:05.860 that it has a risk.
00:16:08.140 So I don't know
00:16:08.980 if Italy will be
00:16:09.940 the first to ban it
00:16:11.360 but now there's a
00:16:12.340 chat GPT
00:16:14.080 had some fairly minor
00:16:16.060 data security problem
00:16:17.400 and that'll scare people.
00:16:19.600 Elon Musk
00:16:20.240 Oh, here,
00:16:20.760 this is interesting.
00:16:22.100 Apparently Elon Musk
00:16:23.440 has already started
00:16:25.220 recruiting AI programmers.
00:16:28.080 Do you see where
00:16:30.080 that's going?
00:16:32.000 So Musk was part
00:16:33.380 of the original
00:16:34.300 what he thought
00:16:34.940 was going to be
00:16:35.480 a publicly available
00:16:37.360 non-profit AI thing
00:16:39.320 open AI
00:16:40.000 but he left
00:16:41.560 because it turned
00:16:42.480 commercial
00:16:43.140 and that was the
00:16:43.900 opposite of what he wanted.
00:16:45.660 He wanted an AI
00:16:46.580 that would just compete
00:16:47.340 with Google
00:16:47.940 and be available
00:16:49.700 to everybody
00:16:50.320 sort of open source.
00:16:52.760 What it became
00:16:53.500 sort of
00:16:54.080 some would say
00:16:55.340 captured by Microsoft
00:16:56.580 because they put
00:16:57.340 an enormous investment
00:16:58.480 into it.
00:16:59.380 Now they don't have
00:17:00.140 a board member
00:17:00.780 and they have
00:17:03.260 less than half
00:17:04.080 of the shares
00:17:05.020 but I don't see
00:17:07.540 how they could
00:17:08.120 not influence it
00:17:09.340 with that much money.
00:17:11.220 So obviously
00:17:11.700 Microsoft has
00:17:12.480 some influence
00:17:12.980 over it,
00:17:14.280 et cetera.
00:17:14.880 I think Musk
00:17:15.920 is going to compete
00:17:16.740 with it
00:17:17.220 and I think Musk
00:17:18.640 is going to build
00:17:19.300 the non-woke version
00:17:21.100 because he's complained
00:17:22.720 specifically
00:17:23.420 about AI being woke
00:17:25.140 and what he said was
00:17:26.920 if AI is woke
00:17:28.360 it will be a liar. 0.79
00:17:31.180 Now that's as direct
00:17:32.580 as you could possibly be.
00:17:34.500 If you make AI woke
00:17:36.080 like humans
00:17:37.360 it will be a liar
00:17:39.320 like humans.
00:17:42.260 And what would be the point
00:17:43.180 of building a liar?
00:17:44.380 Who would do that?
00:17:45.840 That's what we're doing.
00:17:47.180 We're actually building
00:17:48.340 a liar. 0.91
00:17:49.260 We're building
00:17:49.960 the smartest liar
00:17:51.080 that's ever existed.
00:17:53.420 And right in front of us
00:17:54.860 because it is limited
00:17:56.980 in what it can say.
00:17:59.200 It cannot do a poem
00:18:00.720 that is positive
00:18:01.620 for Trump
00:18:02.380 but it can do a poem
00:18:03.880 that's positive
00:18:04.540 for Biden.
00:18:06.000 That's all you need
00:18:06.840 to know.
00:18:08.480 One is inappropriate
00:18:09.500 and the other
00:18:10.040 oh yeah sure
00:18:10.680 I can do a poem
00:18:12.360 praising Biden.
00:18:13.480 No problem.
00:18:14.980 No problem.
00:18:17.180 Alright.
00:18:18.420 So that'll be interesting.
00:18:19.780 I think the
00:18:20.260 you know
00:18:21.780 it's enormously expensive.
00:18:23.420 but he can afford it
00:18:24.280 if he wants.
00:18:24.820 So if Musk
00:18:25.880 builds his own
00:18:26.860 competing AI
00:18:27.820 now I think
00:18:28.920 he already has AI
00:18:29.800 right?
00:18:30.260 It's already in his
00:18:30.960 the Tesla
00:18:31.820 but it's a
00:18:33.180 it's a
00:18:34.060 different version.
00:18:35.560 It's more for
00:18:36.140 recognizing landscape
00:18:37.680 and navigating.
00:18:39.580 It's not so much
00:18:40.600 the language based one.
00:18:42.420 So maybe he's adding
00:18:43.560 the language based stuff.
00:18:44.800 Who knows?
00:18:46.400 Alright let's talk
00:18:46.920 about the Trump charges.
00:18:48.640 Allegedly Trump
00:18:49.360 will be arraigned
00:18:50.120 on Tuesday.
00:18:53.160 So there are
00:18:53.940 30 some charges.
00:18:56.180 What do you think
00:18:57.480 are the odds
00:18:58.640 that there are charges
00:18:59.520 we haven't heard about?
00:19:01.520 What are the odds?
00:19:03.640 Do you think
00:19:04.240 because the only thing
00:19:05.220 we know
00:19:05.560 are leaks
00:19:06.320 that are
00:19:06.740 not really
00:19:07.880 not really dependable.
00:19:10.300 so do you think
00:19:12.100 the leaks
00:19:12.620 are nailed it
00:19:13.760 that it's just
00:19:14.320 some kind of
00:19:16.000 you know
00:19:16.340 creative
00:19:17.100 creative prosecution
00:19:19.440 that turns
00:19:20.500 something into
00:19:21.200 a felony
00:19:22.180 that wouldn't
00:19:22.880 otherwise be a felony
00:19:23.920 and somehow
00:19:25.600 he extended
00:19:26.380 the statute
00:19:27.040 of limitations
00:19:27.780 and it's all
00:19:29.100 sketchy
00:19:29.600 or do you think
00:19:30.360 that they also
00:19:31.320 maybe in addition
00:19:33.160 to that
00:19:33.600 or instead of
00:19:34.440 do you think
00:19:34.780 they have something
00:19:35.260 real?
00:19:36.600 Something they could
00:19:37.320 stand up in court
00:19:38.200 and people would say
00:19:39.160 oh okay that's
00:19:40.060 that's real
00:19:40.500 I
00:19:42.640 it could go
00:19:45.000 either way
00:19:45.620 I think it could
00:19:47.360 go either way
00:19:48.120 but if I had to
00:19:49.300 bet on it
00:19:49.960 just for fun
00:19:51.380 I would bet
00:19:52.520 it's not real
00:19:53.220 I would bet
00:19:54.600 that
00:19:55.280 Jonathan Turley
00:19:57.460 has exactly
00:19:58.220 the right take
00:19:58.940 which is
00:19:59.660 there's no question
00:20:00.900 that it's a
00:20:01.500 political prosecution
00:20:02.560 meaning that
00:20:04.180 the charges
00:20:04.700 would be the kind
00:20:05.640 you wouldn't bring
00:20:06.280 on other people
00:20:07.600 it's just sort of
00:20:08.780 a Trump specific
00:20:09.860 prosecution
00:20:11.020 that's my best guess
00:20:14.980 my best guess
00:20:15.820 is that
00:20:16.260 it is
00:20:16.820 perfectly political
00:20:18.240 and the charges
00:20:19.500 will be weak
00:20:20.300 exactly like you think
00:20:22.240 but
00:20:23.280 but just be aware
00:20:24.940 we could be
00:20:26.040 totally wrong
00:20:26.740 because
00:20:28.340 if you come back
00:20:29.120 to me on Wednesday
00:20:29.800 and say
00:20:30.180 Scott
00:20:30.760 he had all these
00:20:32.400 surprise charges
00:20:33.360 and you said
00:20:34.020 he wouldn't
00:20:34.440 I'm not
00:20:35.320 I wouldn't be surprised
00:20:36.360 by that
00:20:36.880 I think it's like
00:20:38.340 a 60-40
00:20:39.220 60% chance
00:20:41.300 is just what
00:20:42.020 you think it is
00:20:42.740 weak charges
00:20:44.220 and a 40% chance
00:20:46.400 they surprise us
00:20:47.520 but that's a pretty
00:20:49.560 big difference
00:20:50.140 60 and 40
00:20:51.080 alright
00:20:52.440 so far
00:20:56.720 the only effect
00:20:57.900 on Trump
00:20:58.400 is he's raised
00:20:59.180 a lot more money
00:21:00.100 for the campaign
00:21:01.040 and the polls
00:21:03.640 have improved
00:21:05.020 for him substantially
00:21:06.120 like
00:21:07.280 really substantially
00:21:08.400 do you think
00:21:10.320 that is a
00:21:10.840 lasting effect
00:21:11.800 or do you think
00:21:13.760 or
00:21:15.000 is it just
00:21:16.160 a temporary bounce
00:21:17.220 lasting effect
00:21:19.340 or temporary bounce
00:21:20.260 well
00:21:21.040 some of it
00:21:22.700 depends if he's still
00:21:23.800 if he's still
00:21:24.940 battling it
00:21:25.820 during the election
00:21:27.620 you know
00:21:29.180 what would be
00:21:29.520 the best
00:21:30.100 Trump campaign
00:21:31.340 I could ever
00:21:31.880 think of
00:21:32.340 he goes to
00:21:34.860 court every day
00:21:35.660 on trumped up
00:21:37.180 charges
00:21:37.600 just that
00:21:39.540 just seeing him
00:21:41.160 in court
00:21:41.520 every day
00:21:42.140 and having
00:21:43.180 the
00:21:43.680 you know
00:21:44.460 the right
00:21:44.900 leaning commentator
00:21:45.760 say
00:21:46.060 well it's a
00:21:47.020 political prosecution
00:21:48.040 this is how
00:21:49.520 Biden is running
00:21:50.320 for president
00:21:50.900 by using the
00:21:52.240 machinery of
00:21:52.980 government
00:21:53.460 indirectly
00:21:54.420 because he
00:21:54.840 doesn't directly
00:21:55.560 you know
00:21:56.420 Biden doesn't
00:21:57.680 control the
00:21:58.340 the DA
00:21:58.960 but
00:22:00.060 collectively
00:22:02.240 they seem to be
00:22:03.120 acting as one
00:22:04.040 which is not
00:22:05.600 a coincidence
00:22:06.080 and
00:22:07.900 Trump could win
00:22:10.480 by just being
00:22:11.320 in court
00:22:11.900 when he should be
00:22:13.480 you know
00:22:14.920 when he should be
00:22:15.720 campaigning
00:22:16.620 because the thing
00:22:17.520 about Trump is
00:22:18.300 he's releasing
00:22:19.140 all his policy
00:22:19.920 stuff on videos
00:22:20.940 which I think
00:22:21.920 is strong
00:22:22.600 that's a very
00:22:23.620 good technique
00:22:24.340 and you know
00:22:25.780 exactly where
00:22:26.420 he stands
00:22:26.900 on pretty much
00:22:27.520 everything
00:22:27.880 he doesn't
00:22:29.280 need to
00:22:29.640 campaign that
00:22:30.280 much
00:22:30.520 he just
00:22:30.840 needs to
00:22:31.140 be visible
00:22:31.700 it would be
00:22:32.620 an interesting
00:22:33.060 way to make
00:22:33.560 him visible
00:22:34.060 as a
00:22:35.340 target of
00:22:36.740 political
00:22:37.520 chicanery
00:22:39.160 so that could
00:22:40.900 happen
00:22:41.220 all right
00:22:41.780 Wall Street
00:22:42.400 Journal did
00:22:42.860 a poll
00:22:43.140 and here's
00:22:44.680 how they
00:22:45.060 framed it
00:22:45.700 which I think
00:22:46.160 is the wrong
00:22:46.700 frame
00:22:47.120 listen to this
00:22:47.940 sentence
00:22:48.360 66% of
00:22:50.000 Democrats
00:22:50.500 think indictment
00:22:51.540 is motivated
00:22:52.260 is motivated
00:22:55.380 by the law
00:22:56.240 all right
00:22:56.980 so in other
00:22:58.180 words
00:22:58.360 two-thirds
00:22:58.900 of Democrats
00:23:00.020 think that
00:23:01.260 the Trump
00:23:01.640 indictment
00:23:02.100 is not
00:23:02.540 political
00:23:03.040 not political
00:23:04.720 that it's just
00:23:05.760 nobody's above
00:23:06.800 the law
00:23:07.240 do you think
00:23:09.240 that's the way
00:23:09.720 to report
00:23:11.240 that news
00:23:11.880 that two-thirds
00:23:13.200 of Democrats
00:23:13.860 think everything's
00:23:14.680 going right
00:23:15.200 everything's fine
00:23:17.080 here's the other
00:23:18.920 way to say
00:23:19.820 the same thing
00:23:20.700 breaking one
00:23:23.680 of the longest
00:23:24.260 patterns that
00:23:25.460 we've ever
00:23:25.880 seen
00:23:26.320 one-third of
00:23:27.980 Democrats
00:23:28.400 actually agree
00:23:29.500 with Republicans
00:23:30.300 that this is
00:23:31.100 totally political
00:23:31.900 where have you
00:23:33.940 ever seen
00:23:34.580 one-third of
00:23:35.360 Democrats agree 0.77
00:23:36.240 with Republicans
00:23:37.020 I mean I
00:23:38.700 sure it happens
00:23:40.000 but it's pretty
00:23:40.520 rare
00:23:40.840 right
00:23:41.780 shouldn't the
00:23:42.700 headline be
00:23:43.360 an unprecedented
00:23:44.320 number of
00:23:45.440 Democrats
00:23:46.360 understand that
00:23:47.400 this is a
00:23:47.940 political
00:23:48.380 thing
00:23:49.240 and let me
00:23:49.900 ask you a
00:23:50.260 second question
00:23:50.900 do you think
00:23:52.220 that the
00:23:52.560 Democrats
00:23:53.060 who said
00:23:53.480 oh no
00:23:54.260 this is
00:23:55.320 totally about
00:23:55.980 the law
00:23:56.680 it's only
00:23:57.780 about the
00:23:58.260 law
00:23:58.680 there's nothing
00:23:59.700 political
00:24:00.300 about this
00:24:01.100 how many
00:24:01.840 of them
00:24:02.140 believed
00:24:02.880 what they
00:24:03.300 said
00:24:03.640 maybe none
00:24:07.040 maybe zero
00:24:08.520 yeah
00:24:10.100 so I think
00:24:11.320 I think the
00:24:11.980 real story
00:24:12.500 here
00:24:12.800 is that even
00:24:13.860 Democrats
00:24:14.540 even Democrats
00:24:15.980 can clearly see
00:24:17.260 this as a
00:24:17.820 political
00:24:18.260 indictment
00:24:19.260 shouldn't that
00:24:20.920 be the story
00:24:21.540 if one-third
00:24:23.560 of Democrats
00:24:24.260 are on the
00:24:24.660 same side
00:24:25.120 as Republicans
00:24:25.800 the story
00:24:27.740 is the ones
00:24:28.240 who are on
00:24:28.520 the same
00:24:28.820 side
00:24:29.120 not the
00:24:29.480 ones who
00:24:29.740 disagree
00:24:30.120 it's like
00:24:31.300 a backwards
00:24:31.780 report
00:24:32.340 do you see
00:24:34.100 it too
00:24:34.400 or am I
00:24:34.760 just babbling
00:24:35.780 is that point
00:24:37.980 clear
00:24:38.360 that it's
00:24:39.600 reported
00:24:40.000 backwards
00:24:40.520 yeah
00:24:41.540 and that's
00:24:42.820 the Wall
00:24:43.080 Street Journal
00:24:43.560 who you
00:24:44.020 wouldn't expect
00:24:44.580 to be
00:24:45.080 super lefty
00:24:46.500 all right
00:24:49.100 93% of
00:24:50.840 Republicans
00:24:51.240 and 70%
00:24:52.400 of independent
00:24:53.040 voters
00:24:53.640 think it's
00:24:55.020 motivated by
00:24:55.800 politics
00:24:56.380 70%
00:24:58.180 of independent
00:24:59.200 voters
00:24:59.740 what percent
00:25:01.380 of independent
00:25:02.160 voters
00:25:02.640 normally
00:25:03.360 go left
00:25:04.340 versus
00:25:04.760 normally
00:25:05.260 go right
00:25:05.820 because they're
00:25:06.240 pretty dependable
00:25:06.920 usually
00:25:07.280 is it
00:25:10.100 close to
00:25:11.000 half
00:25:11.340 I don't know
00:25:12.520 what it is
00:25:13.040 but that
00:25:14.820 I can't
00:25:15.760 believe that
00:25:16.160 70%
00:25:16.860 are typically
00:25:17.820 on Trump's
00:25:18.760 side
00:25:19.100 that's not
00:25:20.700 common
00:25:21.080 right
00:25:21.420 it's not
00:25:22.340 normal that
00:25:22.880 70% of
00:25:23.860 independents
00:25:24.440 would be
00:25:24.780 pro-Trump
00:25:25.320 I don't
00:25:26.400 think so
00:25:27.020 so
00:25:29.040 they're
00:25:29.400 center-left
00:25:29.920 right
00:25:30.260 they lean
00:25:30.960 just
00:25:31.220 slightly
00:25:31.720 left
00:25:32.120 is that
00:25:32.600 about
00:25:32.780 right
00:25:33.120 60-40
00:25:34.800 Democrat
00:25:35.360 somebody
00:25:36.200 says
00:25:36.600 that sounds
00:25:38.060 right
00:25:38.340 I don't
00:25:38.640 know if
00:25:38.860 that's
00:25:39.060 right
00:25:39.300 but
00:25:40.360 to me
00:25:40.940 these are
00:25:41.380 gigantic
00:25:41.900 numbers
00:25:42.520 suggesting
00:25:43.220 that Trump
00:25:43.860 should win
00:25:44.580 the presidency
00:25:45.400 fairly easily
00:25:46.780 but it's
00:25:48.920 impossible to
00:25:49.640 predict at
00:25:50.120 this point
00:25:50.540 all right
00:25:51.220 here's my
00:25:51.640 take on
00:25:52.180 whether
00:25:52.500 the
00:25:52.980 this
00:25:54.360 situation
00:25:54.940 will matter
00:25:56.020 to the
00:25:56.440 final election
00:25:57.220 no
00:25:58.860 no
00:26:00.140 won't matter
00:26:00.680 won't make
00:26:01.820 any difference
00:26:02.360 here's why
00:26:03.780 if you
00:26:05.840 wanted
00:26:06.240 to want
00:26:07.300 Trump
00:26:08.040 you had
00:26:08.560 lots of
00:26:08.900 reasons
00:26:09.260 you didn't
00:26:10.120 need any
00:26:10.440 new reasons
00:26:11.040 if you
00:26:12.200 wanted to
00:26:12.660 dislike
00:26:13.060 Trump
00:26:13.520 you had
00:26:14.260 lots of
00:26:14.640 reasons
00:26:15.000 you didn't
00:26:16.020 need a
00:26:16.300 new reason
00:26:16.860 nobody
00:26:18.460 needed a
00:26:19.020 new reason
00:26:19.440 for anything
00:26:19.920 there's no
00:26:21.140 new reasons
00:26:21.840 all of our
00:26:23.300 old reasons
00:26:23.960 are just
00:26:24.880 as good
00:26:25.280 as they
00:26:25.560 need to
00:26:25.900 be
00:26:26.120 now
00:26:27.140 the other
00:26:27.740 but the
00:26:28.120 one thing
00:26:28.480 that could 0.68
00:26:28.860 change
00:26:29.320 is motivation
00:26:30.760 to actually
00:26:31.340 vote
00:26:31.740 that could 0.68
00:26:34.500 change
00:26:34.900 because I
00:26:36.120 have to
00:26:36.580 say
00:26:36.860 I felt
00:26:38.280 more likely
00:26:38.900 to vote
00:26:39.460 because
00:26:40.240 it made
00:26:40.780 me angry
00:26:41.400 and anger
00:26:42.940 is not
00:26:43.280 really your
00:26:43.740 best reason
00:26:44.700 for voting
00:26:45.260 but I'm
00:26:46.460 glad we
00:26:46.780 have the
00:26:47.020 option
00:26:47.280 so I've
00:26:49.280 got a
00:26:49.500 feeling
00:26:49.700 that there
00:26:50.020 will be
00:26:50.320 25
00:26:51.000 outrages
00:26:51.820 far bigger
00:26:52.780 than this
00:26:53.400 between now
00:26:54.480 and election
00:26:54.880 day
00:26:55.160 you won't
00:26:56.820 even remember
00:26:57.380 this
00:26:57.780 it'll just
00:26:59.200 be completely
00:26:59.820 cleared out
00:27:00.440 of your
00:27:00.620 memory banks
00:27:01.300 there'll be
00:27:02.240 10 new
00:27:03.240 fake news
00:27:05.200 stories about
00:27:05.880 Trump
00:27:06.200 and Trump
00:27:07.560 will do
00:27:08.080 10
00:27:08.800 outrageous
00:27:09.400 things that
00:27:10.080 you can't
00:27:10.460 imagine he
00:27:10.920 said
00:27:11.220 and then
00:27:12.420 there'll be
00:27:12.880 10 emergencies
00:27:13.900 in the world
00:27:14.580 that you
00:27:14.880 didn't see
00:27:15.260 coming
00:27:15.600 it's just
00:27:18.020 going to be
00:27:18.340 nothing but
00:27:18.800 twists and
00:27:19.240 turns
00:27:19.540 so no
00:27:20.320 I don't
00:27:20.620 think it'll
00:27:20.940 have any
00:27:21.260 difference
00:27:21.640 the only
00:27:22.520 difference
00:27:22.840 will be
00:27:23.320 that Trump
00:27:24.440 got a
00:27:25.060 fundraising
00:27:25.940 boost
00:27:26.520 he got a
00:27:30.840 fundraising
00:27:31.280 boost
00:27:31.800 and
00:27:32.800 it may
00:27:34.820 freeze
00:27:35.400 DeSantis
00:27:35.980 out at
00:27:36.380 the
00:27:36.480 primaries
00:27:36.980 if it
00:27:38.680 has any
00:27:39.200 effect
00:27:39.720 it'll be
00:27:40.600 a short
00:27:40.960 term
00:27:41.140 effect
00:27:41.520 but in
00:27:42.500 the short
00:27:42.860 term
00:27:43.220 it can
00:27:44.240 certainly
00:27:44.520 make
00:27:44.780 DeSantis
00:27:45.240 pause
00:27:46.140 his
00:27:47.200 campaign
00:27:47.800 plans
00:27:49.020 don't you
00:27:49.400 think
00:27:49.700 if you
00:27:50.880 were
00:27:51.020 DeSantis
00:27:51.540 wouldn't
00:27:52.460 you wait
00:27:52.880 to see
00:27:53.180 how this
00:27:53.480 plays
00:27:53.760 out
00:27:54.060 because
00:27:55.540 if he
00:27:55.760 gets
00:27:55.940 convicted
00:27:56.380 you might
00:27:57.120 say
00:27:57.340 I better
00:27:58.240 get in
00:27:58.700 if he
00:27:59.940 doesn't
00:28:00.340 get
00:28:00.520 convicted
00:28:00.960 and it
00:28:01.480 just
00:28:01.640 raises
00:28:02.000 his
00:28:02.280 popularity
00:28:02.800 with
00:28:03.100 his
00:28:03.260 base
00:28:03.600 you better
00:28:04.860 stay
00:28:05.160 out
00:28:05.480 so I
00:28:07.560 think
00:28:07.820 DeSantis
00:28:08.960 is
00:28:09.300 planning
00:28:10.180 to run
00:28:10.800 but also
00:28:12.000 wait and
00:28:12.480 see
00:28:12.660 meaning he
00:28:13.720 won't
00:28:13.960 execute
00:28:14.500 depending on
00:28:15.840 how things
00:28:16.260 go
00:28:16.560 that's what
00:28:17.760 I see
00:28:18.100 even
00:28:20.020 Mike Pence
00:28:20.760 who is
00:28:21.480 not the
00:28:22.120 best
00:28:22.660 friend
00:28:23.560 of
00:28:23.880 Trump
00:28:24.400 at this
00:28:24.820 point
00:28:25.120 because
00:28:25.580 of
00:28:25.760 January 6
00:28:26.460 etc
00:28:27.140 and
00:28:28.500 Pence
00:28:29.060 is even
00:28:29.520 thinking
00:28:30.600 about running
00:28:31.200 against
00:28:31.620 Trump
00:28:31.960 so he's
00:28:33.400 not the
00:28:33.740 one who's
00:28:34.060 going to
00:28:34.340 defend
00:28:34.700 Trump
00:28:35.180 but
00:28:35.900 may I
00:28:36.960 say
00:28:37.220 again
00:28:37.660 that
00:28:39.040 although
00:28:39.400 I don't
00:28:39.860 want
00:28:40.080 Mike Pence
00:28:40.620 to be
00:28:40.920 my
00:28:41.140 president
00:28:41.600 my
00:28:42.660 God
00:28:42.960 he impresses
00:28:43.560 me
00:28:43.800 once
00:28:45.440 again
00:28:45.840 Mike Pence
00:28:47.000 did the
00:28:47.600 stand up
00:28:48.800 correct thing
00:28:50.520 for the
00:28:50.960 country
00:28:51.320 and it
00:28:52.360 wasn't in
00:28:52.800 his best
00:28:53.160 interest
00:28:53.580 wasn't in
00:28:55.200 his best
00:28:55.560 interest
00:28:55.960 maybe it
00:28:56.940 was
00:28:57.240 I mean
00:28:57.640 because I
00:28:58.100 you know
00:28:58.540 I respect
00:28:59.120 him for
00:28:59.460 it
00:28:59.580 maybe it
00:28:59.940 was
00:29:00.140 but I
00:29:00.740 don't
00:29:00.840 think
00:29:00.980 he's
00:29:01.180 going to
00:29:01.380 get
00:29:01.500 elected
00:29:01.840 or anything
00:29:02.300 because of
00:29:02.840 it
00:29:03.040 so
00:29:04.360 Mike Pence
00:29:05.240 once again
00:29:06.220 you have
00:29:06.600 proven a
00:29:07.320 model of
00:29:08.220 human
00:29:09.920 behavior
00:29:10.400 I won't
00:29:11.060 even say
00:29:11.380 Republican
00:29:11.900 I'll say
00:29:12.980 he's a
00:29:13.420 model of
00:29:14.260 good human
00:29:14.860 behavior
00:29:15.320 I really
00:29:16.460 appreciate that
00:29:17.080 from him
00:29:17.480 don't want
00:29:18.900 him to
00:29:19.080 be my
00:29:19.400 president
00:29:19.720 but as
00:29:20.340 a human
00:29:20.820 he does
00:29:21.840 set a
00:29:22.100 good
00:29:22.240 example
00:29:22.660 because he
00:29:24.300 defended
00:29:24.780 Trump
00:29:25.180 he said
00:29:26.040 it was
00:29:26.220 just
00:29:26.400 political
00:29:26.780 charges
00:29:27.260 well
00:29:29.480 this is
00:29:29.940 super
00:29:30.240 interesting
00:29:30.620 to nerds
00:29:31.200 like me
00:29:31.600 who use
00:29:31.960 Twitter
00:29:32.220 so
00:29:33.300 Musk 0.77
00:29:33.700 has
00:29:34.040 released
00:29:34.540 the
00:29:35.620 algorithms
00:29:36.320 the
00:29:36.720 actual
00:29:37.220 code
00:29:37.840 the
00:29:39.060 programming
00:29:39.580 code
00:29:40.000 for
00:29:40.920 when
00:29:41.280 your
00:29:41.640 tweets
00:29:42.140 get a
00:29:42.560 lot
00:29:42.680 of
00:29:42.780 attention
00:29:43.120 and
00:29:43.480 when
00:29:43.660 they're
00:29:43.880 suppressed
00:29:44.320 now
00:29:45.500 this
00:29:46.200 doesn't
00:29:46.540 get to
00:29:46.840 shadow
00:29:47.160 banning
00:29:47.600 but it
00:29:48.380 tells you
00:29:48.700 what kind
00:29:49.200 of
00:29:49.460 tweets
00:29:50.300 Twitter
00:29:51.540 likes
00:29:52.000 and what
00:29:52.480 they don't
00:29:52.800 and there
00:29:53.080 were some
00:29:53.420 surprises
00:29:53.980 there were
00:29:55.500 some surprises
00:29:56.240 would you
00:29:56.820 like to
00:29:57.220 know
00:29:57.480 what makes
00:29:58.460 a tweet
00:29:58.960 get more
00:30:00.240 attention
00:30:00.600 of course
00:30:01.300 you would
00:30:01.620 so
00:30:02.600 courtesy
00:30:03.140 of
00:30:03.960 Twitter
00:30:04.960 user
00:30:05.440 NFT
00:30:06.200 God
00:30:06.940 so it's
00:30:08.340 NFT
00:30:08.900 underscore
00:30:09.700 God
00:30:10.260 who I'm
00:30:11.620 guessing is a
00:30:12.200 programmer
00:30:12.620 went through
00:30:13.620 the code
00:30:14.120 and showed
00:30:14.520 his screenshots
00:30:15.080 and this
00:30:16.240 is what
00:30:16.560 he reports
00:30:17.240 now I
00:30:18.020 suppose
00:30:18.360 it's a
00:30:19.260 little early
00:30:19.740 so maybe
00:30:20.240 other people
00:30:20.900 might have
00:30:21.300 a different
00:30:21.620 view of
00:30:22.160 some of
00:30:22.500 these things
00:30:23.020 but it
00:30:24.040 looked
00:30:24.300 reliable
00:30:25.100 in general
00:30:26.320 so here's
00:30:26.800 what he
00:30:27.000 found
00:30:27.260 if you
00:30:28.800 it counts
00:30:30.820 likes
00:30:31.660 on Twitter
00:30:32.580 more than
00:30:33.800 retweets
00:30:34.440 okay
00:30:35.580 totally
00:30:36.060 surprised
00:30:36.640 but when you
00:30:37.460 think about it
00:30:38.080 that makes
00:30:38.500 sense
00:30:38.900 the more
00:30:40.080 people hit
00:30:40.620 the like
00:30:41.100 button
00:30:41.500 the more
00:30:42.660 likely people
00:30:43.280 like it
00:30:43.780 so Twitter
00:30:45.560 wants you to
00:30:46.080 see stuff
00:30:46.480 you like
00:30:46.900 so if
00:30:47.980 people like
00:30:48.760 it
00:30:49.080 there you
00:30:49.900 go
00:30:50.080 now my
00:30:51.200 behavior
00:30:51.700 for a lot
00:30:52.560 of tweets
00:30:53.000 had been
00:30:53.880 I would
00:30:54.280 retweet it
00:30:55.040 thinking
00:30:56.280 well that's
00:30:57.020 what's best
00:30:57.560 for the
00:30:57.980 person who
00:30:58.540 posted it
00:30:59.120 I wouldn't
00:31:00.380 necessarily
00:31:00.940 hit like
00:31:01.700 because often
00:31:03.080 I would be
00:31:03.520 thinking well
00:31:04.120 it's not that
00:31:05.100 I'm agreeing
00:31:05.760 exactly with
00:31:06.640 the tweet
00:31:07.140 but I think
00:31:08.240 you should
00:31:08.580 see it
00:31:09.020 so I'd
00:31:10.580 retweet
00:31:11.120 as what
00:31:12.220 I thought
00:31:12.540 was a
00:31:12.960 respectful
00:31:13.500 way
00:31:13.900 to treat
00:31:14.900 the tweeter
00:31:15.420 if I didn't
00:31:16.800 exactly agree
00:31:17.580 with it
00:31:17.880 but I thought
00:31:18.260 it was useful
00:31:18.900 part of the
00:31:19.860 conversation
00:31:20.320 now I would
00:31:21.680 probably hit
00:31:22.160 also like
00:31:22.980 because hitting
00:31:24.500 like would
00:31:25.180 boost its
00:31:25.700 message
00:31:26.120 and if the
00:31:27.220 whole point
00:31:27.760 of tweeting
00:31:28.500 is I wanted
00:31:29.300 to boost
00:31:29.720 its message
00:31:30.340 I think that
00:31:32.440 would be the
00:31:32.800 decent thing
00:31:33.280 to do
00:31:33.620 so I'm
00:31:34.400 already going
00:31:34.800 to change
00:31:35.120 my behavior
00:31:35.740 I'm going
00:31:37.320 to hit like
00:31:37.760 more often
00:31:38.540 because now
00:31:39.900 I know
00:31:40.220 it helps
00:31:40.760 the person
00:31:41.200 who tweeted
00:31:41.560 it
00:31:41.940 here's another
00:31:43.880 one
00:31:44.080 and it's a
00:31:44.480 big difference
00:31:45.100 it's like
00:31:46.320 a 30 times
00:31:48.220 impact
00:31:48.720 if you have
00:31:49.800 a lot of
00:31:50.300 likes
00:31:50.720 you get
00:31:51.880 30 times
00:31:52.880 more exposure
00:31:53.720 30 times
00:31:55.460 if you have
00:31:56.920 a lot of
00:31:57.220 likes
00:31:57.540 and if you
00:31:58.920 have a lot
00:31:59.240 of retweets
00:31:59.840 you get
00:32:01.200 20 times
00:32:02.040 the exposure
00:32:02.940 so if
00:32:04.220 people like
00:32:04.880 it
00:32:05.180 then it
00:32:06.780 will go
00:32:07.040 to more
00:32:07.340 people who
00:32:07.780 like it
00:32:08.280 and then it
00:32:08.840 will go
00:32:09.060 to more
00:32:09.320 people who
00:32:09.720 like it
00:32:10.080 so the
00:32:10.380 more people
00:32:10.740 like it
00:32:11.280 the more
00:32:12.140 people will
00:32:12.520 see it
00:32:12.800 like it
00:32:13.320 so very
00:32:15.460 interesting
00:32:15.840 here's one
00:32:17.140 I did not
00:32:17.640 see coming
00:32:18.160 if you use
00:32:18.800 multiple
00:32:19.260 hashtags
00:32:19.760 you're not
00:32:21.860 getting ranked
00:32:22.380 at all
00:32:22.860 didn't you
00:32:26.160 think hashtags
00:32:26.900 were helping
00:32:27.400 you
00:32:27.680 it turns out
00:32:29.500 if you have
00:32:29.820 more than
00:32:30.260 one hashtag
00:32:31.120 they completely
00:32:32.560 remove you
00:32:33.240 from the
00:32:33.760 boost
00:32:34.160 you don't
00:32:34.880 get any
00:32:35.260 boost
00:32:35.620 and when
00:32:37.680 I thought
00:32:38.040 about it
00:32:38.420 I agreed
00:32:38.940 with it
00:32:39.460 because if
00:32:40.640 you have
00:32:40.860 more than
00:32:41.200 one hashtag
00:32:41.780 you're usually
00:32:43.380 a bot
00:32:43.900 you're usually
00:32:46.440 a tweet
00:32:46.820 I don't want
00:32:47.240 to see
00:32:47.560 I almost
00:32:49.200 never want
00:32:49.700 to see
00:32:49.980 a tweet
00:32:50.980 that has
00:32:51.260 more than
00:32:51.560 one hashtag
00:32:52.080 I never
00:32:54.240 really thought
00:32:54.680 about it
00:32:55.140 but I
00:32:55.980 definitely
00:32:56.300 don't like
00:32:56.800 seeing a lot
00:32:57.240 of hashtags
00:32:57.720 so Twitter
00:32:58.820 helps me
00:32:59.300 out
00:32:59.560 that one
00:33:01.800 was not
00:33:02.220 obvious
00:33:02.620 how about
00:33:03.780 if you
00:33:06.040 mention
00:33:06.360 something
00:33:06.780 that's
00:33:07.120 trending
00:33:07.520 you get
00:33:08.600 a little
00:33:08.820 boost
00:33:09.240 so if
00:33:11.080 you can
00:33:11.480 make your
00:33:12.300 thing
00:33:12.520 tie to
00:33:12.980 the
00:33:13.140 trending
00:33:13.460 headline
00:33:13.980 extra
00:33:14.660 boost
00:33:15.060 here's
00:33:17.680 one I
00:33:18.000 did know
00:33:18.440 about
00:33:18.820 if you
00:33:19.680 have an
00:33:19.940 image
00:33:20.220 or a
00:33:20.540 video
00:33:20.780 attached
00:33:21.300 you get
00:33:21.960 a two
00:33:23.140 times
00:33:23.540 boost
00:33:24.000 so here's
00:33:26.080 what I
00:33:26.320 did
00:33:26.520 with my
00:33:27.120 I always
00:33:27.560 do a
00:33:27.820 tweet
00:33:28.060 before my
00:33:28.600 live stream
00:33:29.140 so today
00:33:30.540 what I
00:33:30.840 did was
00:33:31.320 instead of
00:33:31.880 putting
00:33:32.140 text
00:33:32.700 which usually
00:33:33.660 my tweet
00:33:34.100 is just
00:33:34.420 text
00:33:34.800 and then
00:33:36.120 a link
00:33:37.300 to where
00:33:38.060 to get
00:33:38.380 it
00:33:38.680 apparently
00:33:39.520 the other
00:33:40.120 thing that
00:33:40.540 they downgrade
00:33:41.320 is external
00:33:43.400 links
00:33:44.080 I'm not
00:33:49.640 cool with
00:33:50.160 that
00:33:50.460 to me
00:33:52.360 that's not
00:33:52.800 cool
00:33:53.160 here's why
00:33:54.520 I use
00:33:57.060 Twitter
00:33:57.400 for my
00:33:58.260 own
00:33:58.420 entertainment
00:33:58.860 of course
00:33:59.360 but what
00:34:00.100 Twitter gets
00:34:00.620 out of it
00:34:01.020 is my
00:34:01.400 eyeballs
00:34:01.860 to look
00:34:02.340 at their
00:34:02.600 advertisements
00:34:03.160 and I
00:34:04.500 accept that
00:34:05.100 agreement
00:34:05.460 because I
00:34:06.720 like the
00:34:07.080 product
00:34:07.520 and
00:34:09.080 advertisements
00:34:10.760 are just
00:34:11.340 part of the
00:34:11.920 cost
00:34:12.260 so I
00:34:13.380 pay that
00:34:13.820 cost by
00:34:14.520 my attention
00:34:15.440 but a
00:34:17.940 big
00:34:18.220 big
00:34:18.620 big
00:34:19.040 reason
00:34:19.440 that people
00:34:20.060 like me
00:34:20.460 would use
00:34:20.880 Twitter
00:34:21.180 is to
00:34:22.160 give
00:34:22.360 attention
00:34:22.760 to outside
00:34:23.460 links
00:34:23.880 that's
00:34:25.160 my
00:34:25.360 number
00:34:25.760 one
00:34:26.140 reason
00:34:26.560 my
00:34:27.740 number
00:34:28.060 one
00:34:28.380 reason
00:34:28.720 and I
00:34:29.600 get
00:34:29.740 de-boosted
00:34:30.340 for that
00:34:30.740 so
00:34:33.700 here's
00:34:34.360 what I
00:34:34.640 tested
00:34:34.980 I don't
00:34:36.060 think
00:34:36.240 that
00:34:36.480 I don't
00:34:36.960 think
00:34:37.140 that's
00:34:37.500 an
00:34:38.060 ethical
00:34:38.500 I don't
00:34:40.040 think
00:34:40.200 that's
00:34:40.420 ethical
00:34:40.760 let me
00:34:41.400 just say
00:34:41.640 it that
00:34:41.840 way
00:34:42.020 I think
00:34:42.740 this
00:34:42.980 rule
00:34:43.320 within
00:34:43.660 Twitter
00:34:43.980 without
00:34:44.820 being
00:34:45.220 disclosed
00:34:46.140 without
00:34:47.020 being
00:34:47.400 disclosed
00:34:48.220 is
00:34:48.880 unethical
00:34:49.420 now
00:34:50.280 that it's
00:34:50.720 disclosed
00:34:51.460 I'm
00:34:53.120 gonna
00:34:53.280 yeah
00:34:53.720 I'm
00:34:53.840 gonna
00:34:53.980 think
00:34:54.440 about
00:34:54.680 it
00:34:54.780 a little
00:34:54.960 bit
00:34:55.120 more
00:34:55.360 but
00:34:56.080 not
00:34:56.460 disclosing
00:34:57.080 that
00:34:57.320 I
00:34:57.500 consider
00:34:57.860 it
00:34:58.000 unethical
00:34:58.500 wouldn't
00:34:59.940 you
00:35:00.140 am I
00:35:00.980 wrong
00:35:01.160 about
00:35:01.360 that
00:35:01.660 that
00:35:03.040 de-boosting
00:35:03.700 an
00:35:03.880 external
00:35:04.380 link
00:35:04.840 for
00:35:06.180 someone
00:35:06.500 who
00:35:06.640 has
00:35:06.800 a
00:35:06.940 million
00:35:07.180 followers
00:35:07.720 and
00:35:08.060 I
00:35:08.640 presumably
00:35:10.140 I
00:35:10.720 donate
00:35:11.200 a lot
00:35:11.540 to
00:35:11.720 Twitter
00:35:12.020 by my
00:35:13.160 activity
00:35:13.660 because
00:35:14.100 there's
00:35:14.300 lots
00:35:14.560 of
00:35:14.700 followers
00:35:15.120 that
00:35:15.560 can
00:35:15.720 see
00:35:15.900 advertisements
00:35:16.400 to
00:35:17.900 me
00:35:18.020 that
00:35:18.200 seems
00:35:18.440 unethical
00:35:18.980 now
00:35:20.760 that
00:35:20.960 they've
00:35:21.360 now
00:35:22.100 that
00:35:22.340 it's
00:35:22.700 transparent
00:35:23.520 I'm
00:35:24.700 gonna
00:35:24.820 give
00:35:25.080 it
00:35:25.280 a
00:35:25.560 temporary
00:35:25.980 pass
00:35:26.540 because
00:35:27.740 that's
00:35:28.000 moving
00:35:28.280 in the
00:35:28.520 right
00:35:28.660 direction
00:35:29.040 I'd
00:35:30.280 like to
00:35:30.580 see
00:35:30.700 that
00:35:30.880 go
00:35:31.100 away
00:35:31.420 what
00:35:32.620 would
00:35:33.020 you
00:35:33.140 say
00:35:33.380 I'd
00:35:34.160 like
00:35:34.300 to
00:35:34.420 see
00:35:34.540 that
00:35:34.700 go
00:35:34.880 away
00:35:35.080 and
00:35:35.440 the
00:35:35.540 reason
00:35:35.680 I'd
00:35:35.860 like
00:35:35.980 to
00:35:36.100 see
00:35:36.240 it
00:35:36.360 go
00:35:36.520 away
00:35:36.780 is
00:35:37.020 that
00:35:37.180 it's
00:35:37.320 good
00:35:37.540 for
00:35:37.760 me
00:35:38.060 but
00:35:39.900 I
00:35:40.040 also
00:35:40.360 think
00:35:40.660 it
00:35:40.780 would
00:35:40.900 be
00:35:41.040 good
00:35:41.240 for
00:35:41.460 other
00:35:41.800 people
00:35:42.960 now
00:35:43.800 but
00:35:44.400 let's
00:35:44.600 think
00:35:44.820 it
00:35:44.960 through
00:35:45.180 you
00:35:45.780 know
00:35:45.860 before
00:35:46.100 we
00:35:46.260 get
00:35:46.380 hasty
00:35:46.780 if
00:35:47.760 they
00:35:47.940 didn't
00:35:48.700 down
00:35:49.140 if
00:35:49.600 they
00:35:49.760 didn't
00:35:50.080 de-boost
00:35:50.720 things
00:35:51.100 with
00:35:51.340 links
00:35:51.740 maybe
00:35:53.320 that's
00:35:53.580 all
00:35:53.700 you'd
00:35:53.920 see
00:35:54.160 everybody
00:35:55.600 would
00:35:55.920 just
00:35:56.100 use
00:35:56.260 it
00:35:56.380 for
00:35:56.500 free
00:35:56.760 advertising
00:35:57.300 when
00:35:58.180 in
00:35:58.340 fact
00:35:58.560 it's
00:35:58.920 a
00:35:59.080 platform
00:35:59.460 for
00:35:59.860 their
00:36:00.040 own
00:36:00.220 advertising
00:36:00.740 that's
00:36:01.140 what
00:36:01.300 they
00:36:01.540 built
00:36:01.820 they
00:36:02.520 didn't
00:36:02.700 make
00:36:02.900 a
00:36:03.080 platform
00:36:03.440 for
00:36:03.760 you
00:36:04.000 to
00:36:04.140 advertise
00:36:08.060 my
00:36:08.780 link
00:36:09.200 unless
00:36:11.980 I
00:36:12.200 had
00:36:12.340 a
00:36:12.500 million
00:36:12.780 followers
00:36:13.760 it's
00:36:15.840 the
00:36:16.300 fact
00:36:16.560 that
00:36:16.720 I
00:36:16.840 built
00:36:17.100 up
00:36:17.400 enough
00:36:18.340 goodwill
00:36:19.000 in my
00:36:19.400 Twitter
00:36:19.700 feed
00:36:20.140 that
00:36:20.660 people
00:36:20.900 want
00:36:21.240 to
00:36:21.400 go
00:36:21.560 there
00:36:21.860 that's
00:36:22.420 the
00:36:22.540 only
00:36:22.740 reason
00:36:23.080 that
00:36:23.260 it's
00:36:23.400 good
00:36:23.600 for
00:36:23.760 me
00:36:23.880 to
00:36:24.000 put
00:36:24.140 a
00:36:24.240 link
00:36:24.400 in
00:36:24.540 there
00:36:24.720 to
00:36:25.000 an
00:36:25.140 external
00:36:25.460 source
00:36:25.920 otherwise
00:36:26.960 I
00:36:27.220 wouldn't
00:36:27.380 bother
00:36:27.660 so
00:36:29.380 I
00:36:31.140 think
00:36:31.320 this
00:36:31.520 one
00:36:31.660 needs
00:36:31.840 to
00:36:31.960 be
00:36:32.100 rethought
00:36:32.660 a
00:36:33.880 little
00:36:33.980 bit
00:36:34.120 of
00:36:34.220 rethinking
00:36:34.620 on
00:36:34.860 this
00:36:35.020 topic
00:36:35.340 would
00:36:35.540 be
00:36:35.660 good
00:36:35.920 maybe
00:36:36.640 this
00:36:37.520 is
00:36:37.720 the
00:36:37.860 best
00:36:38.140 solution
00:36:38.820 even
00:36:39.140 for
00:36:39.400 me
00:36:39.640 it's
00:36:40.440 possible
00:36:40.820 that
00:36:41.100 I
00:36:41.260 don't
00:36:41.420 want
00:36:41.560 to
00:36:41.660 see
00:36:41.780 that
00:36:41.960 many
00:36:42.180 links
00:36:42.540 on
00:36:42.740 Twitter
00:36:42.960 too
00:36:43.360 so
00:36:44.500 maybe
00:36:45.820 it
00:36:45.960 makes
00:36:46.100 sense
00:36:46.480 but
00:36:47.700 I
00:36:48.460 got
00:36:48.620 questions
00:36:49.120 this
00:36:50.100 one's
00:36:50.360 a
00:36:50.460 little
00:36:50.580 sketchy
00:36:51.040 to
00:36:51.140 me
00:36:51.360 here's
00:36:52.960 some
00:36:53.080 other
00:36:53.240 things
00:36:53.540 that
00:36:53.700 will
00:36:53.880 boost
00:36:54.360 or
00:36:54.560 don't
00:36:54.760 boost
00:36:55.080 your
00:36:55.360 Twitter
00:36:55.800 stuff
00:36:56.200 if
00:36:57.320 you're
00:36:57.520 verified
00:36:57.940 you
00:36:58.240 get
00:36:58.360 a
00:36:58.460 little
00:36:58.560 boost
00:36:58.980 if
00:37:02.200 you
00:37:02.580 oh
00:37:02.860 let me
00:37:03.320 finish
00:37:03.560 my
00:37:03.740 point
00:37:03.940 so
00:37:04.160 in
00:37:04.260 the
00:37:04.380 tweets
00:37:04.680 that
00:37:05.100 send
00:37:06.300 people
00:37:06.620 to
00:37:06.820 this
00:37:07.060 feed
00:37:07.360 today
00:37:07.700 instead
00:37:09.520 of
00:37:09.840 making
00:37:10.280 them
00:37:10.540 all
00:37:10.800 text
00:37:11.240 I
00:37:12.120 just
00:37:12.340 did
00:37:12.500 a
00:37:12.640 screenshot
00:37:13.120 of
00:37:13.660 part
00:37:13.880 of
00:37:13.960 my
00:37:14.100 text
00:37:14.500 and
00:37:15.200 attached
00:37:15.600 it
00:37:15.840 as
00:37:16.080 an
00:37:16.220 image
00:37:16.540 so
00:37:17.920 instead
00:37:18.200 of
00:37:18.400 just
00:37:18.640 text
00:37:19.080 some
00:37:20.020 of
00:37:20.180 it
00:37:20.380 will
00:37:20.780 appear
00:37:21.100 to
00:37:21.520 Twitter
00:37:22.320 to be
00:37:22.640 an
00:37:22.760 image
00:37:23.060 will
00:37:24.540 that
00:37:24.700 make
00:37:24.880 a
00:37:25.000 difference
00:37:25.300 in
00:37:25.560 theory
00:37:25.900 it
00:37:26.080 should
00:37:26.220 boost
00:37:26.500 it
00:37:26.620 by
00:37:26.760 two
00:37:27.020 even
00:37:27.720 though
00:37:27.920 the
00:37:28.080 tweet
00:37:28.320 says
00:37:28.580 exactly
00:37:29.000 the
00:37:29.180 same
00:37:29.360 thing
00:37:29.620 now
00:37:30.500 if
00:37:30.740 I
00:37:30.860 had
00:37:31.020 a
00:37:31.140 link
00:37:31.380 in
00:37:31.540 it
00:37:31.640 to
00:37:31.740 an
00:37:31.880 external
00:37:32.220 source
00:37:32.800 it
00:37:33.500 would
00:37:33.660 de-boost
00:37:34.140 it
00:37:34.340 and
00:37:34.620 of
00:37:34.760 course
00:37:34.920 the
00:37:35.080 whole
00:37:35.220 point
00:37:35.520 of
00:37:35.640 it
00:37:35.740 was
00:37:35.900 to
00:37:36.040 put
00:37:36.160 a
00:37:36.280 link
00:37:36.440 in
00:37:36.580 it
00:37:36.780 but
00:37:37.580 here's
00:37:38.040 what
00:37:38.200 I
00:37:38.340 tried
00:37:38.680 I
00:37:39.500 tried
00:37:39.760 putting
00:37:40.080 the
00:37:40.420 link
00:37:40.920 in
00:37:41.300 the
00:37:41.440 first
00:37:41.720 comment
00:37:42.240 so
00:37:43.800 it's
00:37:43.940 a
00:37:44.060 separate
00:37:44.320 tweet
00:37:44.740 does
00:37:47.420 that
00:37:47.620 help
00:37:47.940 because
00:37:48.840 it's
00:37:48.960 not
00:37:49.180 in
00:37:49.320 the
00:37:49.420 main
00:37:49.620 tweet
00:37:49.880 it's
00:37:50.100 in
00:37:50.200 my
00:37:50.340 own
00:37:50.540 comment
00:37:50.900 to
00:37:51.060 my
00:37:51.180 own
00:37:51.360 tweet
00:37:51.680 I
00:37:52.720 don't
00:37:52.840 know
00:37:53.120 we'll
00:37:54.220 see
00:37:54.500 other
00:37:57.260 things
00:37:57.640 that
00:37:57.880 boost
00:37:58.220 you
00:37:58.420 or
00:37:58.560 don't
00:37:58.940 your
00:37:59.260 content
00:37:59.720 would
00:37:59.980 be
00:38:00.360 if
00:38:01.900 it's
00:38:02.100 media
00:38:02.540 or
00:38:02.880 news
00:38:03.240 you
00:38:03.520 get
00:38:03.640 a
00:38:03.740 boost
00:38:04.000 if
00:38:04.240 it's
00:38:04.400 a
00:38:04.520 trend
00:38:04.780 you
00:38:04.940 get
00:38:05.040 a
00:38:05.140 boost
00:38:05.400 so
00:38:05.880 basically
00:38:06.320 if
00:38:06.540 it
00:38:06.660 ties
00:38:06.940 into
00:38:07.180 whatever
00:38:07.420 is
00:38:07.580 happening
00:38:07.920 in
00:38:08.180 the
00:38:08.480 real
00:38:08.660 world
00:38:08.940 you
00:38:09.080 get
00:38:09.200 a
00:38:09.280 boost
00:38:09.580 and
00:38:10.380 you
00:38:10.480 get
00:38:10.680 demoted
00:38:11.140 if
00:38:11.360 there's
00:38:11.560 no
00:38:11.760 text
00:38:12.260 so
00:38:13.560 you
00:38:13.700 see
00:38:13.860 a
00:38:13.980 lot
00:38:14.100 of
00:38:14.200 tweets
00:38:14.440 where
00:38:14.660 somebody
00:38:15.000 will
00:38:15.200 just
00:38:15.400 do
00:38:15.640 an
00:38:15.960 emoticon
00:38:16.720 and
00:38:17.920 then
00:38:18.060 refer
00:38:18.400 to
00:38:18.580 something
00:38:24.500 picture
00:38:24.900 plus
00:38:25.260 text
00:38:25.680 a
00:38:26.380 URL
00:38:26.860 only
00:38:28.300 will
00:38:28.720 be
00:38:28.880 deboosted
00:38:29.520 I've
00:38:30.240 done
00:38:30.380 that
00:38:30.580 a
00:38:30.700 million
00:38:30.900 times
00:38:31.380 I
00:38:32.060 can't
00:38:32.260 tell
00:38:32.380 you
00:38:32.500 how many
00:38:32.740 times
00:38:33.040 I've
00:38:33.240 tweeted
00:38:33.480 just
00:38:33.800 a
00:38:33.960 URL
00:38:34.400 because
00:38:35.340 it
00:38:35.540 attaches
00:38:36.000 the
00:38:37.380 image
00:38:37.840 automatically
00:38:38.360 I
00:38:39.220 thought
00:38:39.400 that
00:38:39.560 was
00:38:39.680 good
00:38:39.840 enough
00:38:40.160 but
00:38:40.700 apparently
00:38:40.980 not
00:38:41.260 URL
00:38:41.760 by
00:38:42.060 itself
00:38:42.360 is
00:38:42.580 deboosted
00:38:43.160 and
00:38:44.280 name
00:38:44.620 only
00:38:44.920 I
00:38:45.140 don't
00:38:45.240 know
00:38:45.340 what
00:38:45.460 that
00:38:45.600 means
00:38:45.860 name
00:38:46.220 only
00:38:46.500 if
00:38:48.480 it's
00:38:48.720 a
00:38:48.920 non
00:38:49.300 news
00:38:49.660 item
00:38:49.960 it
00:38:50.140 gets
00:38:50.320 deboosted
00:38:51.000 and
00:38:52.080 if
00:38:52.200 it's
00:38:52.360 a
00:38:52.500 non
00:38:52.860 media
00:38:53.220 thing
00:38:53.580 it
00:38:53.740 gets
00:38:53.920 deboosted
00:38:54.580 and
00:38:56.420 they
00:38:57.640 also
00:38:57.900 calculate
00:38:58.440 your
00:38:58.740 account's
00:38:59.380 reputation
00:39:00.000 alright
00:39:00.440 here's
00:39:00.740 one
00:39:00.880 I
00:39:01.000 don't
00:39:01.160 like
00:39:01.400 at
00:39:01.540 all
00:39:01.800 your
00:39:03.080 account's
00:39:03.700 reputation
00:39:04.580 so
00:39:05.580 you
00:39:05.660 get
00:39:05.800 more
00:39:06.060 boost
00:39:06.440 if
00:39:07.200 you're
00:39:07.600 an
00:39:08.380 upstanding
00:39:08.940 Twitter
00:39:09.620 user
00:39:09.980 here's
00:39:11.080 one
00:39:11.260 of
00:39:11.360 the
00:39:11.460 ways
00:39:11.700 they
00:39:11.940 decide
00:39:12.420 if
00:39:12.780 you're
00:39:13.040 an
00:39:13.260 upstanding
00:39:13.780 citizen
00:39:14.280 and
00:39:15.740 let
00:39:15.900 me
00:39:16.000 tell
00:39:16.160 you
00:39:16.280 in
00:39:16.400 advance
00:39:16.780 I
00:39:18.200 hate
00:39:18.520 this
00:39:18.880 you
00:39:20.280 get
00:39:20.500 deboosted
00:39:21.200 if
00:39:21.420 you
00:39:21.580 interact
00:39:22.160 with
00:39:22.540 low
00:39:23.120 quality
00:39:23.600 accounts
00:39:24.260 trolls
00:39:25.380 if
00:39:26.800 you
00:39:26.940 answer
00:39:27.340 a
00:39:27.540 troll
00:39:27.840 you
00:39:29.140 get
00:39:29.400 deboosted
00:39:30.100 I
00:39:31.800 answer
00:39:32.140 trolls
00:39:32.500 every
00:39:32.800 day
00:39:33.020 as part
00:39:33.400 of my
00:39:33.620 entertainment
00:39:34.080 it's
00:39:35.040 part
00:39:35.220 of the
00:39:35.440 show
00:39:35.700 like
00:39:36.900 I
00:39:37.020 do
00:39:37.200 it
00:39:37.380 partly
00:39:37.800 for
00:39:38.060 my
00:39:38.300 followers
00:39:38.760 partly
00:39:39.500 because
00:39:39.740 I
00:39:39.880 like
00:39:40.120 it
00:39:40.340 it's
00:39:40.600 just
00:39:40.740 fun
00:39:41.020 but
00:39:41.880 partly
00:39:42.180 because
00:39:42.500 it's
00:39:42.740 just
00:39:42.900 part
00:39:43.100 of
00:39:43.200 my
00:39:43.340 entertainment
00:39:43.780 to
00:39:44.320 show
00:39:44.620 that
00:39:45.400 I
00:39:45.620 dunked
00:39:46.800 on
00:39:46.920 a
00:39:47.060 troll
00:39:47.300 if
00:39:47.560 it's
00:39:47.700 funny
00:39:48.000 like
00:39:48.880 I
00:39:49.040 only
00:39:49.340 do
00:39:49.480 it
00:39:49.580 if
00:39:49.620 it's
00:39:49.780 funny
00:39:50.160 I
00:39:52.160 but
00:39:53.660 apparently
00:39:54.020 I've
00:39:54.360 been
00:39:54.580 I've
00:39:55.180 been
00:39:55.340 hurting
00:39:55.660 my
00:39:55.960 own
00:39:56.120 business
00:39:56.480 model
00:39:56.880 by
00:39:58.380 interacting
00:39:58.940 with
00:39:59.260 low
00:39:59.560 quality
00:39:59.920 accounts
00:40:00.460 do you
00:40:01.800 think
00:40:01.980 that
00:40:02.140 that
00:40:02.400 should
00:40:02.980 be
00:40:03.120 a
00:40:03.260 rule
00:40:03.460 I
00:40:04.640 would
00:40:04.800 think
00:40:05.000 that
00:40:05.180 if
00:40:05.340 a
00:40:05.640 big
00:40:06.340 account
00:40:06.720 interacts
00:40:07.200 with
00:40:07.460 a
00:40:07.740 small
00:40:08.680 account
00:40:09.140 for
00:40:10.460 any
00:40:10.740 reason
00:40:11.120 that
00:40:12.780 should
00:40:12.980 be
00:40:13.440 hell
00:40:14.360 yes
00:40:14.720 to
00:40:16.580 me
00:40:16.740 that
00:40:16.940 should
00:40:17.120 be
00:40:17.500 an
00:40:18.540 advantage
00:40:18.940 I
00:40:20.020 don't
00:40:20.260 see
00:40:20.440 that
00:40:20.780 as
00:40:21.860 making
00:40:22.280 my
00:40:22.480 reputation
00:40:23.000 go
00:40:23.240 down
00:40:23.520 so
00:40:24.780 I
00:40:25.060 don't
00:40:25.280 know
00:40:25.400 what
00:40:25.540 this
00:40:25.700 means
00:40:26.080 this
00:40:26.800 one
00:40:26.980 I
00:40:27.120 think
00:40:27.320 requires
00:40:28.100 another
00:40:28.620 look
00:40:29.080 again
00:40:30.400 I'm
00:40:30.820 going to
00:40:31.000 stop
00:40:31.760 short
00:40:32.100 of
00:40:32.240 saying
00:40:32.520 it
00:40:32.700 needs
00:40:32.880 to
00:40:33.060 change
00:40:33.480 because
00:40:34.220 you know
00:40:34.440 people
00:40:34.740 put a
00:40:35.700 lot of
00:40:35.960 thought
00:40:36.180 into
00:40:36.400 this
00:40:36.660 I'm
00:40:36.940 just
00:40:37.080 sort
00:40:37.320 of
00:40:37.420 entering
00:40:37.720 the
00:40:37.960 game
00:40:38.200 so
00:40:38.920 I'm
00:40:39.180 open
00:40:39.420 to
00:40:39.660 a
00:40:39.840 better
00:40:40.040 argument
00:40:40.480 there
00:40:40.940 might
00:40:41.080 be
00:40:41.180 an
00:40:41.280 argument
00:40:41.580 that
00:40:41.880 it's
00:40:41.980 good
00:40:42.200 just
00:40:42.380 the
00:40:42.480 way
00:40:42.560 it
00:40:42.660 is
00:40:42.800 but
00:40:43.300 I
00:40:43.420 just
00:40:44.160 don't
00:40:44.440 feel
00:40:44.840 that
00:40:46.320 that
00:40:46.540 makes
00:40:46.780 the
00:40:46.960 world
00:40:47.200 a
00:40:47.360 better
00:40:47.540 place
00:40:47.980 I
00:40:49.080 should
00:40:49.260 be
00:40:49.420 able
00:40:49.560 to
00:40:49.740 interact
00:40:50.200 with
00:40:50.540 everybody
00:40:51.380 small
00:40:52.420 accounts
00:40:53.000 controversial
00:40:54.460 accounts
00:40:55.160 just
00:40:56.240 anybody
00:40:56.660 anytime
00:40:57.980 Twitter
00:40:58.460 puts
00:40:58.820 a
00:40:59.200 limit
00:41:00.740 on
00:41:01.080 who
00:41:01.460 I
00:41:01.660 here's
00:41:02.220 the best
00:41:02.760 way
00:41:02.920 to say
00:41:03.200 it
00:41:03.760 have
00:41:04.880 I
00:41:05.000 ever
00:41:05.200 given
00:41:05.480 you
00:41:05.640 my
00:41:05.880 rant
00:41:06.220 about
00:41:06.660 anybody
00:41:07.260 trying
00:41:08.020 to
00:41:08.560 limit
00:41:09.920 who I
00:41:10.320 talk to
00:41:10.780 or associate
00:41:11.380 with
00:41:11.760 have
00:41:12.760 I
00:41:12.880 done
00:41:13.040 that
00:41:13.240 rant
00:41:13.460 lately
00:41:13.800 because
00:41:14.500 you
00:41:14.600 know
00:41:14.720 I
00:41:14.860 do
00:41:15.000 it
00:41:15.120 at
00:41:15.220 least
00:41:15.400 twice
00:41:15.700 a
00:41:15.860 year
00:41:16.060 and
00:41:16.560 I'm
00:41:16.760 going
00:41:16.860 to
00:41:16.940 do
00:41:17.060 it
00:41:17.160 right
00:41:17.320 now
00:41:17.580 nobody
00:41:18.520 can
00:41:18.900 tell
00:41:19.080 me
00:41:19.240 who
00:41:19.360 to
00:41:19.460 fucking
00:41:19.900 talk
00:41:20.260 to
00:41:20.500 nobody
00:41:21.160 can
00:41:21.440 tell
00:41:21.600 me
00:41:21.740 who
00:41:21.860 to
00:41:21.980 fucking
00:41:22.380 associate
00:41:22.940 with
00:41:23.380 I
00:41:23.900 will
00:41:24.060 tweet
00:41:24.380 whoever
00:41:24.720 the
00:41:24.960 fuck
00:41:25.260 I
00:41:25.420 want
00:41:25.780 for
00:41:26.540 any
00:41:27.020 reason
00:41:27.380 whatsoever
00:41:27.840 you
00:41:28.540 cannot
00:41:28.900 tell me
00:41:29.320 who
00:41:29.440 to
00:41:29.580 associate
00:41:29.960 with
00:41:30.340 this
00:41:30.880 is
00:41:31.060 fucking
00:41:31.340 America
00:41:31.800 I
00:41:32.500 will
00:41:32.640 associate
00:41:33.100 with
00:41:33.480 the
00:41:33.660 worst
00:41:33.960 people
00:41:34.280 in the
00:41:34.500 world
00:41:34.720 for
00:41:35.580 any
00:41:36.060 reason
00:41:36.400 I
00:41:36.600 want
00:41:36.960 could
00:41:37.720 be
00:41:37.860 for
00:41:38.040 entertainment
00:41:38.520 could
00:41:39.420 be
00:41:39.560 because
00:41:39.820 I
00:41:39.960 want
00:41:40.080 to
00:41:40.180 change
00:41:40.420 their
00:41:40.600 minds
00:41:40.880 could
00:41:41.340 be
00:41:41.480 because
00:41:41.780 it's
00:41:41.980 interesting
00:41:42.360 could
00:41:42.620 be
00:41:42.780 because
00:41:43.080 it's
00:41:43.280 news
00:41:43.500 don't
00:41:44.140 fucking
00:41:44.500 tell
00:41:44.780 me
00:41:44.940 who
00:41:45.080 I
00:41:45.200 can
00:41:45.340 talk
00:41:45.620 to
00:41:45.840 don't
00:41:46.500 fucking
00:41:46.860 tell
00:41:47.100 me
00:41:47.240 who
00:41:47.380 I
00:41:47.500 can
00:41:47.660 associate
00:41:48.060 with
00:41:48.380 don't
00:41:48.940 fucking
00:41:49.340 tell
00:41:49.560 me
00:41:49.680 who
00:41:49.820 I
00:41:49.940 can
00:41:50.120 retweet
00:41:50.700 and
00:41:52.000 that's
00:41:52.200 what
00:41:52.340 Twitter's
00:41:52.660 doing
00:41:52.900 now
00:41:54.640 I
00:41:54.820 know
00:41:55.140 that
00:41:56.060 I
00:41:56.220 will
00:41:56.380 be
00:41:56.700 penalized 0.81
00:41:57.820 for
00:41:59.420 associating
00:42:00.060 with
00:42:00.260 people
00:42:00.600 that
00:42:01.520 Twitter
00:42:01.920 believes
00:42:02.340 are
00:42:02.480 low
00:42:02.720 quality
00:42:03.120 are
00:42:05.000 you
00:42:05.100 okay
00:42:05.300 with
00:42:05.460 that
00:42:05.720 are
00:42:06.720 you
00:42:06.860 okay
00:42:07.040 with
00:42:07.220 that
00:42:07.460 I'm
00:42:08.840 not
00:42:09.100 I'm
00:42:09.960 not
00:42:10.120 okay
00:42:10.360 with
00:42:10.520 that
00:42:10.740 now
00:42:11.380 I
00:42:11.600 will
00:42:11.820 allow
00:42:12.800 that
00:42:13.160 there
00:42:13.300 might
00:42:13.480 be
00:42:13.620 a
00:42:13.780 better
00:42:14.020 argument
00:42:14.520 than
00:42:14.800 I'm
00:42:14.980 aware
00:42:15.260 of
00:42:15.580 for
00:42:16.680 having
00:42:17.080 this
00:42:17.520 algorithm
00:42:18.180 but
00:42:19.500 I
00:42:19.680 doubt
00:42:19.920 it's
00:42:20.120 going
00:42:20.240 to
00:42:20.280 be
00:42:20.400 good
00:42:20.580 enough
00:42:20.940 because
00:42:21.840 if
00:42:22.020 you
00:42:22.140 give
00:42:22.320 me
00:42:22.500 any
00:42:23.060 any
00:42:23.780 any
00:42:24.860 any
00:42:25.780 fucking
00:42:26.180 reason
00:42:26.600 that
00:42:27.240 I'm
00:42:27.600 cut
00:42:28.100 off
00:42:28.360 from
00:42:29.080 any
00:42:29.340 other
00:42:29.600 people
00:42:29.940 that
00:42:30.160 I
00:42:30.280 want
00:42:30.480 to
00:42:30.580 talk
00:42:30.780 to
00:42:31.040 unacceptable
00:42:32.380 completely
00:42:34.740 unacceptable
00:42:35.500 that's
00:42:37.480 my
00:42:37.640 take
00:42:37.880 and
00:42:42.000 I
00:42:42.120 don't
00:42:42.280 mind
00:42:42.520 being
00:42:42.780 canceled
00:42:43.240 because
00:42:44.320 I
00:42:44.620 would
00:42:44.720 rather
00:42:44.940 associate
00:42:45.520 any
00:42:45.840 way
00:42:45.980 I
00:42:46.120 want
00:42:46.400 that's
00:42:48.280 my
00:42:48.460 preference
00:42:48.900 all
00:42:51.540 right
00:42:51.720 let's
00:42:52.380 see
00:42:52.660 there's
00:42:53.360 a list
00:42:53.700 of
00:42:53.940 there's
00:42:54.480 a file
00:42:54.900 of
00:42:55.100 black
00:42:55.420 listed
00:42:55.740 topics
00:42:56.320 but
00:42:57.560 the
00:42:57.860 file
00:42:58.180 is
00:42:58.360 not
00:42:58.540 available
00:42:58.860 to
00:42:59.100 us
00:42:59.440 do
00:43:00.080 you
00:43:00.180 think
00:43:00.340 you
00:43:00.480 should
00:43:00.660 be
00:43:00.860 so
00:43:02.220 Elon
00:43:03.100 is in
00:43:04.260 favor
00:43:04.480 of
00:43:04.640 transparency
00:43:05.180 and
00:43:05.620 I
00:43:05.760 love
00:43:06.160 everything
00:43:06.520 about
00:43:06.820 that
00:43:07.060 so
00:43:07.360 nothing
00:43:07.980 but
00:43:08.260 compliments
00:43:08.700 for
00:43:09.060 that
00:43:09.360 but
00:43:10.360 he
00:43:10.880 released
00:43:11.260 the
00:43:11.500 code
00:43:11.980 that
00:43:12.920 determines
00:43:13.420 if you
00:43:13.820 get
00:43:13.980 boosted
00:43:14.440 or
00:43:14.600 suppressed
00:43:15.100 but
00:43:16.020 part
00:43:16.320 of
00:43:16.400 the
00:43:16.540 code
00:43:16.960 addresses
00:43:17.980 a
00:43:18.300 database
00:43:18.840 of
00:43:19.800 secret
00:43:20.760 words
00:43:21.340 and
00:43:22.820 if
00:43:22.960 you
00:43:23.120 use
00:43:23.540 accidentally
00:43:24.060 one
00:43:24.320 of
00:43:24.420 the
00:43:24.540 secret
00:43:24.820 words
00:43:25.300 you'll
00:43:25.960 get
00:43:26.100 deboosted
00:43:26.720 I
00:43:28.520 think
00:43:28.800 transparency
00:43:29.560 requires me
00:43:30.400 to know
00:43:30.740 those
00:43:30.980 words
00:43:31.380 am I
00:43:32.600 wrong
00:43:32.880 it's
00:43:33.840 not
00:43:34.040 transparency
00:43:34.640 if they
00:43:35.000 don't
00:43:35.180 tell us
00:43:35.460 what
00:43:35.660 words
00:43:36.300 deboost
00:43:37.880 me
00:43:38.120 yeah
00:43:40.040 I'm
00:43:40.380 totally
00:43:40.600 right
00:43:40.900 so
00:43:41.600 I
00:43:42.220 haven't
00:43:43.200 heard
00:43:43.500 anything
00:43:43.940 from
00:43:44.700 Musk 0.77
00:43:45.300 saying
00:43:46.080 he
00:43:46.280 would
00:43:46.580 or
00:43:46.740 would
00:43:46.920 not
00:43:47.120 release
00:43:47.600 that
00:43:48.260 database
00:43:48.600 I
00:43:49.180 feel
00:43:49.440 like
00:43:49.640 he
00:43:49.760 would
00:43:50.100 am
00:43:51.620 I
00:43:51.740 wrong
00:43:52.000 if
00:43:53.760 Elon
00:43:54.640 Musk 0.77
00:43:55.000 later
00:43:55.340 said
00:43:55.660 oh
00:43:56.080 we
00:43:56.740 can't
00:43:57.100 release
00:43:57.460 the
00:43:57.660 database
00:43:58.180 of
00:43:58.580 sensitive
00:43:59.660 words
00:44:00.100 that
00:44:00.340 deboost
00:44:00.780 you
00:44:00.960 I
00:44:01.820 would
00:44:02.000 have
00:44:02.180 some
00:44:02.420 real
00:44:02.800 concerns
00:44:03.300 about
00:44:03.580 that
00:44:04.000 real
00:44:05.540 concerns
00:44:05.980 because
00:44:06.480 that
00:44:06.820 would
00:44:07.280 allow
00:44:07.540 you
00:44:07.760 to
00:44:07.980 boost
00:44:08.260 or
00:44:08.420 deboost
00:44:08.800 anything
00:44:09.400 independent
00:44:11.020 of all
00:44:11.580 those
00:44:11.800 other
00:44:12.040 rules
00:44:12.460 I
00:44:13.660 mean
00:44:13.780 maybe
00:44:14.000 all
00:44:14.260 the
00:44:14.400 other
00:44:14.600 rules
00:44:14.860 don't
00:44:15.120 even
00:44:15.300 kick 0.71
00:44:15.580 in
00:44:15.840 if
00:44:16.120 you
00:44:16.220 hit
00:44:16.360 one
00:44:16.520 of
00:44:16.620 those
00:44:16.800 bad
00:44:17.060 words
00:44:17.460 do
00:44:18.320 you
00:44:18.420 think
00:44:18.840 that
00:44:19.180 you're
00:44:19.840 going
00:44:19.920 to
00:44:19.980 get
00:44:20.160 an
00:44:20.360 extra
00:44:20.620 boost
00:44:20.960 for
00:44:21.180 having
00:44:21.460 an
00:44:21.680 image
00:44:21.960 attached
00:44:22.420 if
00:44:23.400 you
00:44:23.540 said
00:44:23.740 a
00:44:23.860 bad
00:44:24.060 word
00:44:24.360 you
00:44:25.180 know
00:44:25.280 one
00:44:25.420 of
00:44:25.500 the
00:44:25.600 banned
00:44:25.940 categories
00:44:26.880 I
00:44:27.580 don't
00:44:27.700 think
00:44:27.940 so
00:44:28.220 my
00:44:28.860 guess
00:44:29.360 and I
00:44:29.740 don't
00:44:29.900 know
00:44:30.080 this
00:44:30.360 this
00:44:30.660 is
00:44:30.820 speculation
00:44:31.280 is
00:44:32.060 more
00:44:32.520 like
00:44:32.820 how
00:44:33.220 I
00:44:33.460 would
00:44:33.600 have
00:44:33.700 built
00:44:33.860 the
00:44:34.040 system
00:44:34.360 if
00:44:35.400 the
00:44:35.580 banned
00:44:35.940 words
00:44:36.320 really
00:44:36.660 matter
00:44:37.100 they
00:44:38.860 would
00:44:39.060 cancel
00:44:39.440 all
00:44:39.740 the
00:44:39.900 rest
00:44:40.080 of
00:44:40.200 the
00:44:40.280 algorithm
00:44:40.740 am
00:44:41.000 I
00:44:41.120 right
00:44:41.380 because
00:44:42.740 that
00:44:42.920 would
00:44:43.160 be
00:44:43.260 the
00:44:43.400 top
00:44:43.600 priority
00:44:44.040 because
00:44:45.060 if
00:44:45.220 you
00:44:45.340 said
00:44:45.640 the
00:44:46.140 Holocaust 0.95
00:44:50.620 I
00:44:51.580 don't
00:44:51.700 think
00:44:51.940 so
00:44:52.200 I
00:44:53.500 think
00:44:53.840 there's
00:44:54.060 nothing
00:44:54.400 you
00:44:54.640 can
00:44:54.820 do
00:44:55.160 if
00:44:55.960 you
00:44:56.120 trip
00:44:56.360 one
00:44:56.580 of
00:44:56.700 the
00:44:56.800 bad
00:44:57.080 words
00:44:57.520 that's
00:44:58.040 my
00:44:58.200 guess
00:44:58.560 because
00:44:59.180 that's
00:44:59.380 the
00:44:59.460 way
00:44:59.580 I
00:44:59.740 would
00:44:59.860 have
00:44:59.940 built
00:45:00.120 it
00:45:00.360 I
00:45:01.120 would
00:45:01.240 have
00:45:01.340 built
00:45:01.520 it
00:45:01.680 you
00:45:01.840 hit
00:45:02.000 that
00:45:02.160 word
00:45:02.420 you're
00:45:02.620 done
00:45:02.860 there's
00:45:03.800 nothing
00:45:04.020 else
00:45:04.240 to
00:45:04.400 talk
00:45:04.620 about
00:45:04.880 now
00:45:07.000 in
00:45:09.220 normal
00:45:09.660 communications
00:45:10.400 I
00:45:12.600 will
00:45:12.860 swear
00:45:13.340 because
00:45:14.220 sometimes
00:45:14.620 it
00:45:14.860 brings
00:45:15.100 attention
00:45:15.500 to
00:45:15.800 something
00:45:16.080 that
00:45:16.280 you
00:45:16.380 want
00:45:16.580 to
00:45:16.760 highlight
00:45:17.220 as
00:45:17.720 I
00:45:17.820 just
00:45:18.020 did
00:45:18.320 right
00:45:20.620 so
00:45:21.820 in
00:45:22.100 normal
00:45:22.420 communications
00:45:23.100 a
00:45:24.200 strategic
00:45:24.880 amount
00:45:25.620 of
00:45:26.240 inappropriateness
00:45:27.380 is actually
00:45:28.000 good
00:45:28.380 communication
00:45:29.100 did you
00:45:29.620 know
00:45:29.760 that
00:45:30.020 doing
00:45:30.940 something
00:45:31.260 that
00:45:31.480 sort
00:45:31.700 of
00:45:31.840 violates
00:45:32.360 an
00:45:32.520 expectation
00:45:33.200 shocks
00:45:34.400 you
00:45:34.620 just
00:45:34.860 a
00:45:35.040 little
00:45:35.200 bit
00:45:35.480 is
00:45:36.120 actually
00:45:36.400 part
00:45:36.860 of
00:45:37.620 effective
00:45:38.020 communications
00:45:38.760 but
00:45:40.280 Twitter
00:45:40.620 is
00:45:40.820 going
00:45:40.940 to
00:45:41.020 say
00:45:41.260 oh
00:45:41.520 you
00:45:41.680 use
00:45:41.900 one
00:45:42.100 of
00:45:42.200 those
00:45:42.500 attention
00:45:43.500 getting
00:45:43.840 words
00:45:44.340 I'm
00:45:45.780 going
00:45:46.080 to
00:45:46.140 give
00:45:46.280 you
00:45:46.380 no
00:45:46.540 attention
00:45:46.900 I
00:45:47.960 think
00:45:48.160 that
00:45:48.320 one
00:45:48.440 needs
00:45:48.640 to
00:45:48.780 be
00:45:48.960 reexamined
00:45:50.480 or
00:45:51.380 we
00:45:51.760 need
00:45:51.940 to
00:45:52.080 see
00:45:52.220 the
00:45:52.400 list
00:45:52.740 I
00:45:54.860 say
00:45:55.020 need
00:45:55.380 but
00:45:55.620 it's
00:45:55.800 more
00:45:55.960 a
00:45:56.140 request
00:45:56.600 I
00:45:57.380 would
00:45:57.600 request
00:45:58.200 and
00:45:59.220 in
00:45:59.620 the
00:46:00.020 name
00:46:00.200 of
00:46:00.340 transparency
00:46:00.840 I
00:46:01.080 think
00:46:01.220 we
00:46:01.340 should
00:46:01.500 see
00:46:01.660 the
00:46:01.780 band
00:46:01.980 words
00:46:02.260 it
00:46:02.980 could
00:46:03.160 be
00:46:03.320 that
00:46:03.480 when
00:46:03.640 you
00:46:03.760 see
00:46:03.960 them
00:46:04.140 you'll
00:46:04.380 agree
00:46:04.640 with
00:46:04.820 them
00:46:04.940 totally
00:46:05.260 right
00:46:05.600 it's
00:46:06.220 going
00:46:06.340 to
00:46:06.360 be
00:46:06.460 a
00:46:06.540 bunch
00:46:06.700 of
00:46:06.960 anti
00:46:07.540 Semitic 0.92
00:46:08.020 stuff
00:46:08.480 and
00:46:08.720 you're
00:46:09.560 going
00:46:09.640 to
00:46:09.660 look
00:46:09.820 at
00:46:09.940 them
00:46:10.040 and
00:46:10.100 say
00:46:10.240 all
00:46:10.500 right
00:46:10.740 I
00:46:11.220 agree
00:46:11.500 but
00:46:13.260 we
00:46:13.400 should
00:46:13.540 know
00:46:13.780 New
00:46:16.020 York
00:46:16.200 Times
00:46:16.500 said
00:46:16.740 it's
00:46:16.900 not
00:46:17.080 going
00:46:17.180 to
00:46:17.280 pay
00:46:17.460 for
00:46:17.840 Twitter
00:46:18.800 so
00:46:19.780 it's
00:46:19.960 not
00:46:20.180 going
00:46:20.320 to
00:46:20.380 get
00:46:20.520 verified
00:46:21.020 why
00:46:24.440 is
00:46:24.680 that
00:46:24.980 is
00:46:26.740 that
00:46:26.880 such
00:46:27.120 a
00:46:27.280 big
00:46:27.480 expense
00:46:28.000 $10
00:46:28.980 a
00:46:29.420 month
00:46:29.620 that
00:46:30.740 New
00:46:31.420 York
00:46:31.540 Times
00:46:31.900 doesn't
00:46:33.400 want
00:46:33.560 to
00:46:33.780 pay
00:46:34.940 for
00:46:35.140 their
00:46:35.420 reporters
00:46:36.920 to be
00:46:37.220 on
00:46:37.340 Twitter
00:46:37.580 and
00:46:38.700 verified
00:46:39.160 and
00:46:39.880 are
00:46:39.960 you
00:46:40.080 telling
00:46:40.260 me
00:46:40.440 that
00:46:40.660 a
00:46:40.900 reporter
00:46:41.380 a
00:46:42.380 New
00:46:42.520 York
00:46:42.680 Times
00:46:42.960 reporter
00:46:43.480 are
00:46:44.280 you
00:46:44.400 telling
00:46:44.580 me
00:46:44.720 that
00:46:44.860 they
00:46:45.000 won't
00:46:45.200 just
00:46:45.380 get
00:46:45.560 their
00:46:45.700 own
00:46:45.940 verification
00:46:46.540 for
00:46:48.160 $10
00:46:48.420 a
00:46:48.840 month
00:46:49.060 because
00:46:50.120 don't
00:46:50.340 you
00:46:50.480 think
00:46:50.660 New
00:46:50.860 York
00:46:50.960 Times
00:46:51.180 reporters
00:46:51.640 want
00:46:51.920 to
00:46:52.000 have
00:46:52.140 lots
00:46:52.400 of
00:46:52.520 followers
00:46:52.900 because
00:46:53.840 that's
00:46:54.060 how
00:46:54.200 they
00:46:54.440 get
00:46:54.720 their
00:46:54.880 own
00:46:55.080 stories
00:46:55.440 boosted
00:46:55.960 they
00:46:56.300 tweet
00:46:56.540 their
00:46:56.720 own
00:46:56.880 story
00:46:57.240 that's
00:46:58.180 what
00:46:58.300 gets
00:46:58.560 it
00:46:58.700 boosted
00:46:59.100 that's
00:46:59.400 how
00:46:59.500 they
00:46:59.620 get
00:46:59.840 raises
00:47:00.280 and
00:47:00.580 better
00:47:00.820 jobs
00:47:01.220 so
00:47:03.540 maybe
00:47:04.820 the
00:47:05.100 company
00:47:05.480 New
00:47:05.720 York
00:47:05.860 Times
00:47:06.140 won't
00:47:06.520 pay
00:47:06.820 for
00:47:07.140 pay
00:47:09.240 for
00:47:09.500 what
00:47:09.720 you
00:47:13.480 but
00:47:13.980 my
00:47:14.200 comment
00:47:14.520 on
00:47:14.780 this
00:47:15.000 is
00:47:15.220 if
00:47:15.460 the
00:47:15.600 New
00:47:15.720 York
00:47:15.880 Times
00:47:16.220 gets
00:47:16.520 de-boosted
00:47:17.320 I
00:47:18.380 don't
00:47:18.560 know
00:47:18.700 if
00:47:18.820 that's
00:47:19.020 bad
00:47:19.280 it's
00:47:20.880 just
00:47:21.040 one
00:47:21.280 more
00:47:21.480 fake
00:47:21.800 news
00:47:22.220 entity
00:47:22.620 getting
00:47:22.940 de-boosted
00:47:23.640 so
00:47:24.020 what's
00:47:24.980 the
00:47:25.080 difference
00:47:25.400 what's
00:47:28.340 that
00:47:28.460 say
00:47:28.720 all
00:47:32.100 right
00:47:32.320 according
00:47:34.480 to the
00:47:34.740 Wall
00:47:34.900 Street
00:47:35.080 Journal
00:47:35.380 the
00:47:35.920 number
00:47:37.220 of
00:47:37.400 people
00:47:37.620 who
00:47:37.880 think
00:47:38.220 that
00:47:38.440 college
00:47:39.080 degree
00:47:39.360 is
00:47:39.580 a
00:47:39.700 good
00:47:39.840 idea
00:47:40.220 is
00:47:40.580 way
00:47:40.800 down
00:47:41.160 42%
00:47:44.740 of
00:47:44.980 people
00:47:45.240 in
00:47:45.480 the
00:47:45.640 recent
00:47:45.920 survey
00:47:46.360 said
00:47:47.480 getting
00:47:47.780 a
00:47:47.980 college
00:47:48.260 degree
00:47:48.540 isn't
00:47:48.800 worth
00:47:49.040 it
00:47:49.260 and
00:47:51.280 that's
00:47:51.480 a
00:47:51.580 big
00:47:51.740 increase
00:47:52.120 from
00:47:52.320 what
00:47:52.480 they
00:47:52.600 used
00:47:52.780 to
00:47:52.880 say
00:47:53.080 what
00:47:56.180 do
00:47:56.260 you
00:47:56.360 think
00:47:56.660 do
00:47:58.400 you
00:47:58.520 think
00:47:58.660 this
00:47:58.880 story
00:47:59.220 is
00:47:59.420 accurately
00:47:59.960 reported
00:48:00.580 that
00:48:02.120 42%
00:48:02.940 of
00:48:03.160 people
00:48:03.660 think
00:48:03.980 college
00:48:04.380 degrees
00:48:04.760 aren't
00:48:05.000 worth
00:48:05.200 it
00:48:05.520 no
00:48:07.360 it's
00:48:07.520 not
00:48:07.720 accurately
00:48:08.180 reported
00:48:08.740 it's
00:48:09.500 not
00:48:09.720 accurately
00:48:10.240 reported
00:48:10.720 at all
00:48:11.320 it's
00:48:11.900 not
00:48:12.060 even
00:48:12.240 close
00:48:12.560 to
00:48:12.740 accurately
00:48:13.180 reported
00:48:13.760 allow
00:48:14.720 me
00:48:14.980 to
00:48:15.160 help
00:48:15.460 people
00:48:16.940 who
00:48:17.180 got
00:48:17.460 bullshit
00:48:17.960 degrees
00:48:18.600 realize
00:48:19.180 that
00:48:19.560 they
00:48:19.700 were
00:48:19.840 bullshit
00:48:20.240 people
00:48:21.380 who
00:48:21.580 got
00:48:21.820 engineering
00:48:22.380 degrees
00:48:22.980 are
00:48:23.580 enjoying
00:48:23.940 their
00:48:24.200 careers
00:48:24.640 and
00:48:24.940 making
00:48:25.180 lots
00:48:25.480 of
00:48:25.640 money
00:48:25.900 that's
00:48:28.500 the
00:48:28.680 story
00:48:29.040 the
00:48:30.040 story
00:48:30.400 is
00:48:30.620 colleges
00:48:31.200 are
00:48:31.800 offering
00:48:32.280 bullshit
00:48:32.820 and
00:48:33.840 mostly
00:48:34.620 women 1.00
00:48:35.080 if
00:48:38.540 I
00:48:38.700 may
00:48:38.900 be
00:48:39.080 sexist
00:48:39.540 for a
00:48:39.820 moment
00:48:40.060 not
00:48:41.460 you know
00:48:41.860 not
00:48:42.040 completely
00:48:42.500 women 1.00
00:48:42.860 of course
00:48:43.300 but
00:48:44.100 more
00:48:44.760 women 1.00
00:48:45.080 than
00:48:45.280 men
00:48:45.620 are
00:48:46.240 taking
00:48:46.560 the
00:48:46.920 let's
00:48:47.980 say
00:48:48.140 the
00:48:48.380 majors
00:48:49.260 that
00:48:49.560 don't
00:48:49.720 have
00:48:49.900 a
00:48:50.000 big
00:48:50.180 career
00:48:50.640 boost
00:48:51.100 and
00:48:53.280 more
00:48:53.460 men
00:48:53.720 than
00:48:53.860 women 1.00
00:48:54.080 are
00:48:54.320 taking
00:48:54.800 STEM
00:48:55.220 classes
00:48:56.040 so
00:48:57.440 I
00:48:59.240 don't
00:48:59.400 know
00:48:59.580 it
00:49:00.200 looks
00:49:00.360 to me
00:49:01.460 exactly
00:49:01.920 the way
00:49:02.300 it's
00:49:02.460 supposed
00:49:02.680 to
00:49:02.900 look
00:49:03.200 to
00:49:04.760 me
00:49:05.040 people
00:49:05.900 who
00:49:06.100 get
00:49:06.620 valuable
00:49:07.180 degrees
00:49:07.860 believe
00:49:08.720 they
00:49:08.940 got
00:49:09.160 valuable
00:49:09.600 degrees
00:49:10.220 and
00:49:10.900 the
00:49:11.020 people
00:49:11.240 who
00:49:11.600 took
00:49:12.320 courses
00:49:12.700 that
00:49:12.960 were
00:49:13.080 clearly
00:49:13.480 not
00:49:13.780 valuable
00:49:14.220 know
00:49:15.340 that
00:49:15.560 they
00:49:15.700 took
00:49:15.920 courses
00:49:16.260 that
00:49:16.460 are
00:49:16.580 clearly
00:49:16.900 not
00:49:17.160 valuable
00:49:17.540 now
00:49:18.260 may
00:49:18.700 I
00:49:18.880 add
00:49:19.180 a
00:49:19.520 super
00:49:19.880 sexist
00:49:20.460 commentary
00:49:20.900 on this
00:49:21.440 who's up
00:49:22.320 for
00:49:22.460 super
00:49:22.800 sexism
00:49:23.360 super
00:49:24.500 sexism
00:49:25.080 anybody
00:49:25.460 in the
00:49:26.940 form of
00:49:27.300 entertainment
00:49:27.780 super
00:49:28.840 sexism
00:49:29.380 I forgot
00:49:31.600 what I was
00:49:31.920 going to
00:49:32.080 say
00:49:32.320 I
00:49:35.460 actually
00:49:35.740 did
00:49:35.960 forget
00:49:36.220 what I
00:49:36.500 was
00:49:36.620 going
00:49:36.740 to
00:49:36.840 say
00:49:37.100 it
00:49:37.980 will
00:49:38.060 come
00:49:38.200 back
00:49:38.420 to
00:49:38.540 me
00:49:38.760 yeah
00:49:43.300 it
00:49:43.800 was
00:49:44.160 really
00:49:44.360 good
00:49:44.600 though
00:49:44.800 you
00:49:45.460 know
00:49:45.580 if
00:49:45.780 you'd
00:49:46.020 heard
00:49:46.240 it
00:49:46.500 I
00:49:47.220 believe
00:49:47.500 you
00:49:47.640 would
00:49:47.780 have
00:49:47.880 enjoyed
00:49:48.200 it
00:49:49.400 yeah
00:49:49.780 it
00:49:51.520 will
00:49:51.580 come
00:49:51.720 back
00:49:51.900 to
00:49:52.000 me
00:49:52.420 all
00:49:53.860 right
00:49:54.080 let's
00:49:57.880 see
00:49:58.160 women 1.00
00:49:59.100 and
00:49:59.420 older
00:49:59.720 Americans
00:50:00.180 are
00:50:00.660 driving
00:50:01.020 the
00:50:01.240 decline
00:50:01.680 in
00:50:01.880 confidence
00:50:02.280 in
00:50:02.580 college
00:50:02.980 why
00:50:03.760 do
00:50:03.880 you
00:50:03.980 think
00:50:04.140 it
00:50:04.280 is
00:50:04.460 that
00:50:04.640 women 1.00
00:50:04.920 and
00:50:05.220 older
00:50:05.560 Americans
00:50:06.080 are
00:50:06.360 driving
00:50:06.740 oh
00:50:07.200 I
00:50:07.780 got
00:50:08.000 it
00:50:08.180 I
00:50:08.380 just
00:50:08.560 remembered
00:50:08.860 the
00:50:09.080 super
00:50:09.360 sexist
00:50:09.800 thing
00:50:10.060 correct me
00:50:11.980 if I'm
00:50:12.280 wrong
00:50:12.600 but
00:50:13.920 when I
00:50:14.300 went to
00:50:14.620 college
00:50:14.920 a billion
00:50:15.420 years
00:50:15.760 ago
00:50:16.100 it
00:50:17.580 was
00:50:17.740 a
00:50:17.900 common
00:50:18.240 joke
00:50:18.680 very
00:50:19.080 sexist
00:50:19.580 joke
00:50:19.920 to
00:50:20.760 say
00:50:20.980 that
00:50:21.280 if
00:50:21.860 a
00:50:22.080 young
00:50:22.440 woman 0.99
00:50:22.720 was
00:50:22.960 in
00:50:23.120 college
00:50:23.520 that
00:50:24.280 she
00:50:24.480 was
00:50:24.640 there
00:50:24.840 for
00:50:25.100 MRS
00:50:25.840 degree
00:50:26.240 you've
00:50:27.320 heard
00:50:27.460 that
00:50:27.680 right
00:50:27.960 the
00:50:29.060 MRS
00:50:29.660 degree
00:50:30.000 now
00:50:31.980 that
00:50:33.340 would be
00:50:33.660 one good
00:50:34.200 reason
00:50:34.500 to go
00:50:34.780 to
00:50:34.900 college
00:50:35.260 and
00:50:35.820 people
00:50:36.160 who
00:50:36.360 went
00:50:36.540 to
00:50:36.680 college
00:50:36.960 and
00:50:37.240 got
00:50:37.780 married
00:50:38.120 and
00:50:38.420 met
00:50:38.620 their
00:50:38.780 future
00:50:39.140 husband
00:50:39.540 or
00:50:40.660 future
00:50:40.980 wife
00:50:41.300 would
00:50:41.640 probably
00:50:41.860 have a
00:50:42.120 better
00:50:42.360 view
00:50:42.760 of
00:50:42.920 marriage
00:50:43.300 or
00:50:43.600 better
00:50:44.040 view
00:50:44.300 of
00:50:44.440 college
00:50:44.780 because
00:50:45.580 college
00:50:45.960 definitely
00:50:47.120 had that
00:50:47.600 benefit
00:50:47.980 it makes
00:50:48.380 you more
00:50:48.820 marriageable
00:50:49.680 I would
00:50:50.920 also argue
00:50:51.560 that a
00:50:53.600 woman who 0.99
00:50:54.000 wants to
00:50:54.420 bag a
00:50:55.040 high income
00:50:55.980 husband
00:50:56.560 which I
00:50:57.760 believe is
00:50:58.320 from
00:50:59.080 biological
00:50:59.760 reasons
00:51:00.580 is entirely
00:51:01.320 appropriate
00:51:01.860 it's just
00:51:03.680 a natural
00:51:04.080 impulse
00:51:04.500 that the
00:51:05.440 best way
00:51:05.820 to do
00:51:06.060 that would
00:51:06.420 be to
00:51:06.660 go to
00:51:06.900 college
00:51:07.180 yourself
00:51:07.600 even if
00:51:08.120 you got
00:51:08.340 a
00:51:08.460 bullshit
00:51:08.700 degree
00:51:09.140 am I
00:51:09.520 right
00:51:09.720 a woman 0.57
00:51:11.400 with a
00:51:11.780 bullshit
00:51:12.080 college
00:51:12.560 degree
00:51:12.960 is more
00:51:14.100 likely
00:51:14.480 to attach
00:51:15.260 to get
00:51:16.640 a high
00:51:17.140 income
00:51:17.440 husband
00:51:17.800 because
00:51:18.920 the high
00:51:19.280 income
00:51:19.560 husband
00:51:20.000 is looking
00:51:20.840 for somebody
00:51:21.680 who has
00:51:21.980 maybe
00:51:22.820 similar
00:51:23.260 credentials
00:51:23.820 now
00:51:26.880 fast
00:51:27.500 forward
00:51:27.800 to today
00:51:28.440 does
00:51:29.840 your
00:51:30.040 college
00:51:30.620 experience
00:51:31.220 help you
00:51:31.680 get married
00:51:32.240 in 2023
00:51:33.080 yes or
00:51:34.880 no
00:51:35.080 no
00:51:36.020 it makes
00:51:36.640 it far
00:51:37.020 less likely
00:51:37.640 you'll get
00:51:37.980 married
00:51:38.280 because
00:51:39.560 college
00:51:40.080 is what
00:51:40.460 makes
00:51:41.340 you
00:51:41.580 unappealing
00:51:42.220 to men
00:51:42.680 in 2023
00:51:44.480 let me
00:51:46.100 say that
00:51:46.460 again
00:51:46.760 in the
00:51:48.060 70s
00:51:48.720 a woman 0.57
00:51:50.100 with a
00:51:50.460 college
00:51:50.780 degree
00:51:51.200 any
00:51:51.720 kind
00:51:52.100 any
00:51:52.660 kind
00:51:52.900 of
00:51:53.000 college
00:51:53.260 degree
00:51:53.560 I
00:51:54.160 would
00:51:54.340 automatically
00:51:54.860 say
00:51:55.280 hmm
00:51:55.740 there's
00:51:57.180 somebody
00:51:57.440 I could
00:51:57.720 have a
00:51:57.940 conversation
00:51:58.460 with
00:51:58.880 alright
00:51:59.620 alright
00:52:00.040 if they
00:52:00.740 needed
00:52:00.980 to work
00:52:01.520 optionally
00:52:02.740 if they
00:52:03.240 needed
00:52:03.460 to
00:52:03.680 maybe
00:52:04.500 a little
00:52:04.780 boost
00:52:05.180 and I
00:52:05.980 would say
00:52:06.260 that's
00:52:06.640 definitely
00:52:07.040 like one
00:52:08.240 more variable
00:52:08.880 in the
00:52:09.280 marriageable
00:52:09.820 department
00:52:10.340 now
00:52:11.000 I would
00:52:11.720 not
00:52:11.900 limit
00:52:12.200 myself
00:52:12.620 to
00:52:12.800 somebody
00:52:13.060 who
00:52:13.180 went
00:52:13.300 to
00:52:13.440 college
00:52:13.800 that's
00:52:15.100 not like
00:52:15.440 a requirement
00:52:15.980 or anything
00:52:16.420 but
00:52:17.180 it'd be
00:52:17.700 one thing
00:52:18.140 you'd put
00:52:18.520 on the
00:52:18.940 good pile
00:52:20.100 right
00:52:20.780 and in fact
00:52:21.820 my first
00:52:22.480 marriage
00:52:23.620 was not
00:52:25.040 like that
00:52:25.460 so
00:52:26.380 it wasn't
00:52:27.740 something that
00:52:28.240 I had
00:52:28.500 high on
00:52:28.900 my own
00:52:29.420 list
00:52:29.840 but it's
00:52:30.600 a plus
00:52:30.960 it's a
00:52:31.660 little bit
00:52:31.900 of a plus
00:52:32.380 now
00:52:33.540 in 2023
00:52:34.320 would you
00:52:35.080 want
00:52:35.500 to even
00:52:36.620 associate
00:52:37.200 with a
00:52:37.980 young
00:52:38.200 woman 0.99
00:52:38.480 who
00:52:38.920 had
00:52:39.220 a
00:52:39.440 typical
00:52:40.000 liberal
00:52:41.100 arts
00:52:41.820 college
00:52:42.840 degree
00:52:43.280 I
00:52:44.500 wouldn't
00:52:44.740 even
00:52:44.920 want
00:52:45.080 to
00:52:45.140 have
00:52:45.260 a
00:52:45.360 conversation
00:52:45.920 and I'm
00:52:47.880 not even
00:52:48.220 joking
00:52:48.560 that's like
00:52:49.840 an actual
00:52:50.340 serious
00:52:50.980 opinion
00:52:51.440 no
00:52:52.000 hyperbole
00:52:52.620 I would
00:52:53.560 not be
00:52:54.000 interested
00:52:54.440 in a
00:52:55.000 conversation
00:52:55.720 of any
00:52:57.160 kind
00:52:57.580 of any
00:52:59.480 kind
00:52:59.900 because I
00:53:02.840 believe that
00:53:03.420 young
00:53:04.300 women 1.00
00:53:04.620 who are
00:53:05.340 going to
00:53:05.740 college
00:53:06.100 have been
00:53:07.360 brainwashed
00:53:10.320 or polluted
00:53:11.000 or educated
00:53:11.900 if you want
00:53:12.640 to say it
00:53:12.980 in a positive
00:53:13.380 way
00:53:13.640 educated
00:53:14.220 to have
00:53:15.180 a negative
00:53:15.620 opinion
00:53:16.020 about me
00:53:16.680 before
00:53:18.020 they've
00:53:18.340 met me
00:53:18.880 am I
00:53:20.020 right
00:53:20.300 when I
00:53:21.860 walk into
00:53:22.340 a room
00:53:22.700 do I
00:53:22.960 look like
00:53:23.340 I'm part
00:53:23.660 of the
00:53:23.860 patriarchy 0.85
00:53:24.440 oh yeah
00:53:25.880 I got
00:53:27.700 patriarchy 0.85
00:53:28.300 written all
00:53:28.820 over me
00:53:29.260 I mean
00:53:30.440 my middle
00:53:31.000 name is
00:53:31.360 patriarchy 0.85
00:53:32.020 yeah
00:53:33.020 you see
00:53:33.720 this
00:53:33.980 white guy
00:53:35.800 of a
00:53:36.080 certain
00:53:36.280 age
00:53:36.560 walk
00:53:36.820 into
00:53:37.020 a
00:53:37.200 room
00:53:37.380 I
00:53:38.020 assume
00:53:38.640 anybody
00:53:39.680 under
00:53:40.060 25
00:53:40.620 dislikes
00:53:41.160 me
00:53:41.420 I
00:53:43.080 just
00:53:43.280 assume
00:53:43.680 because they
00:53:44.720 would be
00:53:45.020 trained
00:53:45.480 that I
00:53:46.560 am the
00:53:46.840 devil 0.66
00:53:47.120 and if I
00:53:48.640 said you
00:53:48.940 know I
00:53:49.780 used to
00:53:50.100 think
00:53:50.380 Donald
00:53:51.260 Trump had
00:53:51.780 some good
00:53:52.160 tools
00:53:52.600 in 2016
00:53:54.060 I thought
00:53:54.540 he'd be
00:53:55.000 solid
00:53:55.520 president
00:53:55.920 I would
00:53:56.700 never be
00:53:57.120 able to
00:53:57.340 have any
00:53:57.880 conversation
00:53:58.500 with a
00:53:59.580 young woman
00:54:00.120 after they
00:54:00.800 knew that
00:54:01.340 that'd be
00:54:02.280 the end
00:54:02.580 of it
00:54:03.400 so
00:54:04.540 the value
00:54:06.600 of college
00:54:07.120 has decreased
00:54:07.760 not just
00:54:08.380 for its
00:54:08.820 economic
00:54:09.800 value
00:54:10.260 well I
00:54:11.440 guess getting
00:54:11.800 married is
00:54:12.920 an economic
00:54:13.420 value
00:54:13.780 yeah I
00:54:14.280 guess it's
00:54:14.600 all fall
00:54:14.940 of the
00:54:15.160 money
00:54:15.380 isn't it
00:54:16.220 even getting
00:54:17.060 married is
00:54:17.620 basically an
00:54:18.580 economic
00:54:19.020 plan
00:54:19.400 was that
00:54:23.160 sexist
00:54:23.820 enough
00:54:24.360 or just
00:54:25.280 right
00:54:25.640 was it
00:54:27.000 just right
00:54:27.440 I think
00:54:28.840 that was
00:54:29.680 just enough
00:54:30.360 spiciness
00:54:30.980 to get
00:54:32.780 you a 0.57
00:54:33.020 little
00:54:33.220 extra
00:54:33.860 flavor
00:54:34.240 there
00:54:34.560 all right
00:54:35.420 you're
00:54:36.260 welcome
00:54:36.540 I asked
00:54:39.140 this question
00:54:40.240 on Twitter
00:54:41.000 in my
00:54:42.180 highly
00:54:42.560 scientific
00:54:43.240 Twitter poll
00:54:44.140 what is
00:54:45.360 the bigger
00:54:45.740 risk to
00:54:46.200 America
00:54:46.580 climate
00:54:47.120 change
00:54:47.660 or the
00:54:48.820 combination
00:54:49.260 of DEI
00:54:50.200 CRT
00:54:51.040 and ESG
00:54:52.060 well
00:54:53.280 this might
00:54:54.320 say more
00:54:54.880 about my
00:54:55.360 audience
00:54:55.820 than it
00:54:56.380 does about
00:54:56.760 the topic
00:54:57.240 but the
00:54:58.400 answer was
00:54:58.940 4%
00:54:59.760 thought
00:55:00.360 climate
00:55:01.400 change
00:55:01.760 was the
00:55:02.100 bigger
00:55:02.260 risk
00:55:02.620 and 96%
00:55:04.520 thought the
00:55:05.420 bigger
00:55:05.760 existential
00:55:06.800 risk to
00:55:07.520 America
00:55:07.880 was
00:55:08.320 DEI
00:55:09.520 CRT
00:55:10.180 and ESG
00:55:10.940 and I
00:55:11.960 agree with
00:55:12.360 that
00:55:12.640 I agree
00:55:13.920 with that
00:55:14.360 and to
00:55:15.820 me that's
00:55:16.200 obvious
00:55:16.620 because with
00:55:18.220 climate change
00:55:19.060 it could
00:55:20.600 get bad
00:55:21.140 but we'll
00:55:22.300 find ways
00:55:22.880 to adjust
00:55:23.440 and compensate
00:55:24.320 and we'll
00:55:25.280 figure it out
00:55:25.860 no matter
00:55:27.240 what happens
00:55:27.700 with climate
00:55:28.260 no matter
00:55:28.840 who's causing
00:55:29.440 it or not
00:55:30.280 causing it
00:55:30.860 I feel like
00:55:31.880 we're going
00:55:32.120 to figure
00:55:32.420 that out
00:55:32.900 but the
00:55:35.240 DEI
00:55:35.800 CRT
00:55:36.320 ESG
00:55:36.780 stuff
00:55:37.180 that could 0.68
00:55:39.060 be a
00:55:39.320 kill shot
00:55:39.860 to me
00:55:41.300 that could 0.68
00:55:41.660 be a
00:55:41.900 kill shot
00:55:42.420 that could 0.68
00:55:43.400 take you
00:55:43.900 right off
00:55:44.360 of the
00:55:44.580 map
00:55:44.900 because this
00:55:46.420 is a
00:55:46.840 bug in
00:55:47.240 the software
00:55:47.840 right
00:55:49.440 climate
00:55:50.900 change
00:55:51.360 is sort
00:55:51.720 of a
00:55:51.920 hardware
00:55:52.260 problem
00:55:52.800 literally
00:55:54.460 we build
00:55:55.720 machines
00:55:56.360 you know
00:55:58.560 this is
00:55:58.940 the climate
00:55:59.600 change
00:55:59.980 story
00:56:00.360 we build
00:56:01.160 machines
00:56:01.640 the machines
00:56:02.260 do bad
00:56:03.020 things for
00:56:03.480 the climate
00:56:04.480 so that's
00:56:06.880 a hardware
00:56:07.620 problem
00:56:08.140 we can fix
00:56:09.180 hardware
00:56:09.600 problems
00:56:10.260 fairly
00:56:11.560 reliably
00:56:12.140 if we have
00:56:12.800 time to
00:56:13.220 do it
00:56:13.600 but the
00:56:15.200 DEI
00:56:15.800 CRT
00:56:16.300 ESG
00:56:16.680 is a
00:56:17.040 psychological
00:56:17.560 problem
00:56:18.160 that I'll
00:56:18.960 call a
00:56:19.280 software
00:56:19.600 problem
00:56:20.080 a software
00:56:21.140 problem
00:56:21.520 can take
00:56:21.920 you offline
00:56:22.360 right away
00:56:23.040 and can
00:56:24.280 put you out
00:56:24.700 of business
00:56:25.040 forever
00:56:25.420 you know
00:56:26.420 if it's
00:56:26.680 bad enough
00:56:27.180 so I
00:56:28.880 think people
00:56:29.280 are right
00:56:29.640 now obviously
00:56:31.240 if it were
00:56:31.820 a democrat
00:56:32.560 majority
00:56:33.400 voting for
00:56:34.100 this it
00:56:34.460 would be
00:56:34.720 opposite I
00:56:35.440 assume
00:56:35.660 but I
00:56:37.060 don't think
00:56:37.400 democrats
00:56:37.880 have a
00:56:38.260 full
00:56:38.480 understanding
00:56:39.060 of the
00:56:39.700 cost
00:56:40.840 let's say
00:56:42.540 the unintended
00:56:43.100 cost
00:56:43.760 of all of
00:56:44.780 the equity
00:56:45.280 stuff
00:56:45.660 the unintended
00:56:46.920 cost is
00:56:47.740 that it's
00:56:48.040 driving
00:56:48.460 population
00:56:49.700 that you
00:56:50.760 want to
00:56:51.260 interact
00:56:51.700 with
00:56:52.020 because they
00:56:52.600 have all
00:56:52.860 the resources
00:56:53.420 and the
00:56:53.800 jobs
00:56:54.160 that population
00:56:55.640 wants to have
00:56:56.320 nothing to do
00:56:57.700 with you
00:56:58.080 if you're
00:56:59.260 infected with
00:56:59.980 that mindset
00:57:00.900 it's not about
00:57:02.500 race
00:57:02.920 you know
00:57:04.780 white or black
00:57:05.520 young or old
00:57:06.240 if you have
00:57:06.700 this mindset
00:57:07.320 that white 0.95
00:57:08.640 people took
00:57:09.180 all your stuff
00:57:09.800 and they better
00:57:10.260 give it back
00:57:11.140 I don't want
00:57:12.360 to be around
00:57:12.800 you
00:57:13.060 I don't want
00:57:14.200 to have anything
00:57:14.740 to do with
00:57:15.280 you at all
00:57:16.320 not economically
00:57:17.820 not socially
00:57:19.120 not in any
00:57:20.360 way
00:57:20.580 I don't want
00:57:21.040 to have any
00:57:21.440 involvement
00:57:22.020 with people
00:57:22.620 who are
00:57:23.480 poisoned
00:57:23.940 mentally
00:57:24.940 poisoned
00:57:25.460 alright
00:57:27.960 so
00:57:30.360 this will
00:57:31.300 give you
00:57:31.760 let's say
00:57:33.440 a read
00:57:34.040 of the room
00:57:34.680 if you want
00:57:37.100 to know
00:57:37.340 the temperature
00:57:37.960 of the room
00:57:38.840 even understand
00:57:40.920 that most
00:57:41.420 of my twitter
00:57:41.880 followers
00:57:42.300 are leaning
00:57:43.240 right or
00:57:45.000 independent
00:57:45.460 here's what
00:57:47.020 I tweeted
00:57:47.480 and I'll tell
00:57:48.360 you in advance
00:57:48.940 it got a
00:57:49.500 million retweets
00:57:50.460 now
00:57:51.740 I have over
00:57:52.960 900,000
00:57:53.820 followers
00:57:54.500 but to get
00:57:56.160 over a
00:57:57.320 million retweets
00:57:58.360 that doesn't
00:57:59.700 happen a lot
00:58:00.400 you know that
00:58:01.560 right
00:58:01.860 normal retweets
00:58:03.480 for me would
00:58:03.940 be
00:58:04.220 10 to
00:58:05.780 40,000
00:58:06.520 10 to
00:58:08.360 40,000
00:58:08.920 on a pretty
00:58:09.480 solid tweet
00:58:10.180 if you get
00:58:11.520 a million
00:58:12.040 retweets
00:58:13.100 you hit
00:58:14.140 a nerve
00:58:15.080 so this
00:58:16.740 one hit
00:58:17.600 a nerve
00:58:18.120 and it
00:58:19.180 said
00:58:19.540 DEI is
00:58:21.120 essentially a
00:58:21.780 hunting license
00:58:22.620 for democrats
00:58:23.760 to identify
00:58:24.480 and eliminate
00:58:25.220 conservatives
00:58:25.800 from the
00:58:26.460 military
00:58:26.900 government
00:58:27.880 education
00:58:28.600 and the
00:58:29.140 workplace
00:58:29.580 you can
00:58:30.980 prove me
00:58:31.440 wrong
00:58:31.840 with an
00:58:32.320 example
00:58:32.720 of a
00:58:33.400 conservative
00:58:33.980 heading up
00:58:35.280 a DEI
00:58:36.100 department
00:58:36.800 there are
00:58:39.100 no
00:58:39.500 I'll bat
00:58:40.440 I mean
00:58:41.860 I don't
00:58:42.140 know
00:58:42.480 nobody's
00:58:43.520 proven it
00:58:43.940 yet
00:58:44.200 but do
00:58:45.120 you think
00:58:45.340 there's
00:58:45.580 even
00:58:45.820 one
00:58:46.380 white
00:58:47.580 male
00:58:47.960 conservative
00:58:48.540 who would
00:58:49.740 ever be
00:58:50.140 considered
00:58:50.580 to head
00:58:51.100 up a
00:58:51.380 DEI
00:58:51.780 department
00:58:52.260 nope
00:58:54.960 nope
00:58:56.260 now
00:58:57.200 this is
00:58:58.260 nothing
00:58:58.600 but a
00:58:59.040 hunting
00:58:59.280 license
00:58:59.840 which
00:59:01.000 allows
00:59:01.360 democrats
00:59:01.940 to hunt
00:59:02.460 republicans
00:59:04.140 conservatives
00:59:05.060 it's a
00:59:06.880 hunting
00:59:07.180 license
00:59:07.740 it's
00:59:09.240 nothing
00:59:09.600 else
00:59:10.020 and once
00:59:11.820 you hear
00:59:12.140 that it's
00:59:12.600 hard to
00:59:12.860 think of
00:59:13.160 it another
00:59:13.480 way
00:59:13.720 isn't
00:59:13.920 it
00:59:14.560 it's
00:59:15.100 just
00:59:15.420 a
00:59:15.640 license
00:59:16.040 to
00:59:16.300 attack
00:59:16.640 conservatives
00:59:17.240 that's
00:59:17.700 all it
00:59:18.200 is
00:59:18.460 it
00:59:19.640 got me
00:59:20.200 it
00:59:21.740 got me
00:59:22.260 because
00:59:24.020 it was
00:59:24.320 I'm
00:59:25.540 sure it
00:59:25.820 was the
00:59:26.140 DEI
00:59:26.700 entities
00:59:27.660 within
00:59:28.280 the groups
00:59:29.900 that cancelled
00:59:30.360 me
00:59:30.580 of course
00:59:31.000 it was
00:59:31.260 the DEI
00:59:31.780 people
00:59:32.080 that's
00:59:32.980 their job
00:59:33.540 if you
00:59:35.220 get hired
00:59:35.600 to look
00:59:35.940 for ghosts
00:59:36.520 you're
00:59:37.380 going to
00:59:37.480 find some
00:59:37.900 ghosts
00:59:38.280 because that's
00:59:39.400 how you
00:59:39.620 get paid
00:59:40.060 if you get
00:59:40.940 hired to
00:59:41.460 look for
00:59:41.880 racists
00:59:42.580 you're
00:59:43.400 going to
00:59:43.520 find some
00:59:43.920 racists
00:59:44.420 lots of
00:59:45.460 them
00:59:45.680 because that's
00:59:46.560 how you
00:59:46.760 get paid
00:59:47.140 so we've
00:59:48.920 created a
00:59:49.800 system
00:59:50.220 in which
00:59:51.520 we've
00:59:51.820 actually
00:59:52.180 intentionally
00:59:52.860 inserted
00:59:53.420 the thing
00:59:54.600 that will
00:59:54.940 destroy
00:59:55.420 the company
00:59:56.320 which is
00:59:57.680 a change
00:59:58.800 of focus
00:59:59.400 to ridiculous
01:00:00.700 things
01:00:01.300 instead of
01:00:02.580 profitability
01:00:03.160 so
01:00:05.240 I think
01:00:08.300 this
01:00:08.620 issue
01:00:09.560 is the
01:00:10.020 killer
01:00:10.280 issue
01:00:10.720 for the
01:00:11.840 next
01:00:12.100 election
01:00:12.520 I think
01:00:14.280 if a
01:00:15.620 Republican
01:00:16.240 candidate
01:00:16.960 now Vivek
01:00:18.860 has done
01:00:19.160 a great
01:00:19.460 job
01:00:19.740 in speaking
01:00:20.200 out
01:00:20.440 against
01:00:20.760 these
01:00:21.300 corrosive
01:00:22.020 ideas
01:00:22.700 but I
01:00:24.320 think
01:00:24.500 this
01:00:24.720 framing
01:00:25.140 is the
01:00:25.740 strongest
01:00:26.100 I've
01:00:26.580 seen
01:00:26.780 yet
01:00:27.060 that
01:00:27.420 it's
01:00:27.560 a
01:00:27.700 hunting
01:00:27.940 license
01:00:28.500 for
01:00:29.680 Republicans
01:00:30.240 agree
01:00:32.980 because
01:00:33.960 when you
01:00:34.240 hear
01:00:34.420 hunting
01:00:34.680 license
01:00:35.080 that's
01:00:35.440 a whole
01:00:35.900 different
01:00:36.280 feeling
01:00:36.820 than
01:00:37.660 oh we
01:00:38.160 disagree
01:00:38.540 on some
01:00:38.980 things
01:00:39.340 no
01:00:40.420 you're
01:00:41.360 hunting
01:00:41.740 me
01:00:42.080 you're
01:00:43.420 actually
01:00:43.880 stalking
01:00:44.640 me
01:00:44.920 let me
01:00:45.940 ask you
01:00:46.260 this
01:00:46.560 prior to
01:00:47.700 me being
01:00:48.420 cancelled
01:00:49.380 do you
01:00:51.220 think there
01:00:51.660 were any
01:00:52.120 entities
01:00:52.540 that were
01:00:53.120 poised
01:00:54.400 and waiting
01:00:55.560 and watching
01:00:56.360 literally
01:00:57.960 stalking
01:00:58.780 my public
01:01:00.060 activities
01:01:00.680 to look
01:01:01.960 for the
01:01:02.340 little
01:01:02.640 opportunity
01:01:03.720 to jump
01:01:04.360 in
01:01:04.560 yes
01:01:05.280 they were
01:01:07.040 not
01:01:07.320 ignoring
01:01:07.860 me
01:01:08.300 until
01:01:09.120 I
01:01:09.340 did
01:01:09.500 something
01:01:09.860 wrong
01:01:10.260 they
01:01:11.060 were
01:01:11.260 hunting
01:01:11.680 they
01:01:13.260 were
01:01:13.440 hunting
01:01:13.800 do you
01:01:15.360 think
01:01:15.560 any
01:01:15.780 of the
01:01:16.060 other
01:01:16.240 big
01:01:16.520 accounts
01:01:17.020 that
01:01:17.380 might
01:01:17.560 be
01:01:17.880 pro
01:01:18.780 Republican
01:01:19.280 in some
01:01:19.740 way
01:01:19.940 do you
01:01:20.580 think
01:01:20.740 any
01:01:20.940 of them
01:01:21.180 else
01:01:21.380 are
01:01:21.500 being
01:01:21.660 watched
01:01:21.980 carefully
01:01:22.460 well
01:01:24.200 yeah
01:01:24.500 because
01:01:25.840 they're
01:01:26.020 looking
01:01:26.240 to get
01:01:26.560 rid
01:01:26.740 of
01:01:26.860 your
01:01:27.020 Matt
01:01:27.320 Walsh's
01:01:27.980 and
01:01:28.140 your
01:01:28.320 everybody
01:01:29.120 else's
01:01:29.680 you
01:01:30.260 know
01:01:30.440 a lot
01:01:31.360 of them
01:01:31.600 are
01:01:31.820 safe
01:01:32.420 because
01:01:32.780 they're
01:01:33.000 in
01:01:33.240 entities
01:01:33.640 that are
01:01:34.100 going to
01:01:34.340 protect
01:01:34.580 them
01:01:34.880 but yeah
01:01:36.160 they're
01:01:36.540 all
01:01:36.800 being
01:01:37.000 watched
01:01:37.400 now the
01:01:38.240 thing that
01:01:38.580 I had
01:01:38.900 that made
01:01:39.280 me
01:01:39.580 unsafe
01:01:40.600 was exactly
01:01:41.940 the thing
01:01:42.340 that I thought
01:01:42.740 made me
01:01:43.140 safe
01:01:43.420 so I had
01:01:43.800 that completely
01:01:44.380 wrong
01:01:44.740 I thought
01:01:45.600 having
01:01:46.060 thousands
01:01:47.220 of clients
01:01:48.120 would make
01:01:49.560 me safe
01:01:50.080 because even
01:01:50.520 if a few
01:01:50.960 got mad
01:01:51.480 I'd still
01:01:51.820 have thousands
01:01:52.400 but I didn't
01:01:54.360 understand that
01:01:55.060 I'd have
01:01:55.380 choke points
01:01:56.020 and that the
01:01:57.000 DEI people
01:01:57.680 could go after
01:01:58.220 the choke point
01:01:58.900 the publisher
01:01:59.860 and just
01:02:00.740 turn it
01:02:01.060 all off
01:02:01.540 but if I
01:02:03.160 had worked
01:02:03.560 for let's
01:02:04.060 say the
01:02:04.560 Daily Wire
01:02:05.460 or the
01:02:05.900 Blaze or
01:02:06.800 something
01:02:07.080 and a whole
01:02:08.000 bunch of
01:02:08.420 Democrats
01:02:08.860 didn't like
01:02:09.420 me
01:02:09.660 well
01:02:10.460 so what
01:02:12.060 it wouldn't
01:02:13.180 make any
01:02:13.540 difference at
01:02:13.980 all
01:02:14.200 I would
01:02:14.940 still have
01:02:15.260 my job
01:02:15.760 and the
01:02:16.120 people who
01:02:16.520 paid me
01:02:16.900 would be
01:02:17.260 happy the
01:02:17.780 Democrats
01:02:18.240 didn't like
01:02:18.700 me
01:02:18.940 so I was
01:02:20.820 way more
01:02:21.560 vulnerable
01:02:22.060 than I
01:02:22.500 thought
01:02:22.820 but now
01:02:24.060 I've moved
01:02:24.540 my business
01:02:25.640 into a
01:02:26.300 subscription
01:02:26.800 model
01:02:27.300 so that I
01:02:28.680 can protect
01:02:29.180 myself
01:02:29.580 and by
01:02:31.700 the way
01:02:31.900 the value
01:02:32.900 of the
01:02:33.460 Locals
01:02:33.920 platform
01:02:34.460 and Rumble 0.98
01:02:35.600 that bought
01:02:36.200 Locals
01:02:36.580 or merged
01:02:37.620 with it
01:02:37.940 the value
01:02:38.940 of the
01:02:39.240 Locals
01:02:39.560 platform
01:02:40.060 to free
01:02:40.600 speech
01:02:40.980 is just
01:02:42.240 incalculable
01:02:43.200 you literally
01:02:44.680 can get
01:02:45.180 cancelled
01:02:45.560 and then
01:02:46.020 still have
01:02:46.440 a life
01:02:47.420 after
01:02:47.780 cancellation
01:02:48.220 and I'm
01:02:49.400 not sure
01:02:49.720 that was
01:02:50.020 true when
01:02:50.640 Roseanne
01:02:51.240 got cancelled
01:02:51.880 remember
01:02:53.000 when Roseanne
01:02:53.640 got cancelled
01:02:54.200 where did
01:02:54.620 she go 0.99
01:02:55.040 nowhere
01:02:56.380 nowhere
01:02:57.820 because there
01:02:58.880 was no
01:02:59.340 place to
01:02:59.840 go
01:03:00.120 she was
01:03:01.500 just out
01:03:01.820 of business
01:03:02.240 now she's 0.98
01:03:02.840 back
01:03:03.220 but if
01:03:04.980 she had
01:03:05.640 done that
01:03:06.060 when
01:03:06.420 maybe she's
01:03:07.540 not the
01:03:07.860 ideal person
01:03:08.680 to be on
01:03:09.000 Locals
01:03:09.400 maybe she 0.99
01:03:10.040 is
01:03:10.220 but you
01:03:11.180 can imagine
01:03:11.680 she could
01:03:12.160 have
01:03:12.480 just
01:03:13.200 recreated
01:03:14.560 a different
01:03:15.500 base of
01:03:15.960 popularity
01:03:16.460 with different
01:03:17.060 tools
01:03:17.460 Robert
01:03:24.980 says
01:03:25.420 hunting
01:03:25.800 is a
01:03:26.180 more
01:03:26.320 conservative
01:03:26.860 meme
01:03:27.340 and you're
01:03:27.960 digging
01:03:28.180 yourself
01:03:28.580 further
01:03:28.900 into
01:03:29.200 extremism
01:03:29.920 and
01:03:30.680 marginalization
01:03:31.640 than
01:03:31.940 necessary
01:03:32.460 I like
01:03:34.840 that comment 0.92
01:03:35.440 I like
01:03:36.660 that comment 0.92
01:03:37.260 but let
01:03:38.120 me tell
01:03:38.380 you that
01:03:38.860 I'm
01:03:40.240 surfing
01:03:40.680 the sun
01:03:41.120 intentionally
01:03:41.800 good advice
01:03:45.680 would be
01:03:46.140 hey
01:03:46.500 stay away
01:03:47.540 from the
01:03:47.840 sun
01:03:48.060 you'll
01:03:48.280 get
01:03:48.440 burned
01:03:48.800 I know
01:03:50.080 that
01:03:50.400 I know
01:03:50.880 it's
01:03:51.060 safer
01:03:51.340 I don't
01:03:52.500 want to
01:03:52.720 be safe
01:03:53.240 I'm not
01:03:54.940 attempting
01:03:55.300 to keep
01:03:55.720 myself
01:03:56.080 safe
01:03:56.460 I'm trying
01:03:57.820 to make
01:03:58.180 a point
01:03:58.620 because I
01:03:59.140 think it's
01:03:59.460 important
01:03:59.940 I think it's
01:04:00.800 important for
01:04:01.280 our survival
01:04:01.940 actually our
01:04:03.400 survival
01:04:03.800 we have to
01:04:05.240 get this
01:04:05.560 stuff right
01:04:06.100 and it's
01:04:06.940 very wrong
01:04:07.800 right now
01:04:08.320 we've got to
01:04:09.480 figure some
01:04:10.060 way not to
01:04:11.260 hate each
01:04:11.680 other over
01:04:12.320 politics
01:04:13.000 and DEI
01:04:14.420 stuff and
01:04:15.020 bullshit
01:04:15.340 and not
01:04:16.540 take our
01:04:16.980 eyes off
01:04:17.700 the
01:04:17.980 profitability
01:04:19.120 and the
01:04:19.800 well-being
01:04:20.180 of the
01:04:20.480 country
01:04:20.760 so yes
01:04:23.060 calling it
01:04:23.840 haunting
01:04:24.220 is
01:04:25.980 let's say
01:04:28.100 it's evocative
01:04:28.960 of or
01:04:29.660 reminds you
01:04:30.420 of
01:04:30.800 extremism
01:04:32.420 and then
01:04:33.840 it got your
01:04:34.280 attention
01:04:34.680 didn't it
01:04:35.260 did it get
01:04:36.480 your attention
01:04:37.000 it got your
01:04:39.220 attention enough
01:04:39.880 to make a
01:04:40.900 comment saying
01:04:41.600 it was
01:04:41.820 dangerous
01:04:42.300 so if I
01:04:44.040 got your
01:04:44.420 attention
01:04:44.820 that's all
01:04:45.780 I want
01:04:46.180 I don't
01:04:46.960 want your
01:04:47.320 safety
01:04:47.700 I don't
01:04:48.760 want your
01:04:49.100 protection
01:04:49.620 I don't
01:04:51.520 don't need
01:04:52.040 it
01:04:52.240 I only want
01:04:53.980 you to pay
01:04:54.320 attention
01:04:54.780 there you go
01:04:57.540 all right
01:04:59.020 I don't think
01:05:01.120 that the
01:05:01.560 attacks on
01:05:02.140 DEI
01:05:02.780 where we
01:05:03.780 cleverly
01:05:04.460 change the
01:05:05.340 letters to
01:05:05.960 D-I-E 0.99
01:05:07.160 I get
01:05:08.540 it
01:05:08.740 it's clever
01:05:09.300 but there's
01:05:10.680 no persuasive
01:05:11.480 punch to
01:05:12.200 that
01:05:12.480 it's just
01:05:13.200 sort of an
01:05:13.840 interesting thing
01:05:14.520 that's all
01:05:15.040 all right
01:05:21.500 haunted us in
01:05:25.000 Las Vegas
01:05:25.740 you got
01:05:27.020 hunted in
01:05:27.500 Las Vegas
01:05:27.940 now
01:05:35.040 am I
01:05:37.240 dangerous
01:05:37.820 just
01:05:41.040 just
01:05:41.400 occurred to
01:05:42.000 me to ask
01:05:42.440 that
01:05:42.660 I've seen
01:05:48.000 a lot of
01:05:48.360 yeses
01:05:48.720 a few
01:05:49.020 noes
01:05:49.420 the
01:05:50.940 locals
01:05:51.420 people are
01:05:51.880 more likely
01:05:52.300 to say
01:05:52.580 yes
01:05:52.860 they've
01:05:53.920 seen more
01:05:54.360 of my
01:05:54.760 toolbox
01:05:56.000 oh this
01:05:57.340 is interesting
01:05:57.800 there's quite
01:05:58.280 a split
01:05:58.740 YouTube is
01:05:59.860 almost all
01:06:00.740 noes
01:06:01.240 that I'm
01:06:01.900 not
01:06:02.080 dangerous
01:06:02.500 with some
01:06:02.900 yeses
01:06:03.300 and locals
01:06:04.940 is mostly
01:06:05.800 yes with a
01:06:06.460 few noes
01:06:06.980 that's quite
01:06:07.720 a difference
01:06:08.220 interesting
01:06:10.420 well I'm
01:06:14.220 dangerous to
01:06:14.800 some things
01:06:15.360 I'm sure
01:06:17.260 I'm dangerous
01:06:17.760 to some
01:06:18.100 things
01:06:18.300 all right
01:06:18.800 let me ask
01:06:19.420 you another
01:06:19.880 narcissistic
01:06:21.280 question
01:06:21.680 so this is
01:06:23.560 purely narcissistic
01:06:24.900 if you'd like
01:06:25.400 to see it that
01:06:25.900 way
01:06:26.100 but I kind
01:06:27.940 of need to
01:06:28.440 know
01:06:28.760 like I
01:06:29.920 actually need
01:06:30.440 to know
01:06:30.740 this
01:06:31.080 am I in
01:06:34.980 the top
01:06:35.520 20%
01:06:36.460 of people
01:06:37.540 influencing
01:06:38.080 politics
01:06:38.680 no not
01:06:39.260 top 20%
01:06:39.980 top 20
01:06:40.840 people
01:06:41.240 top 20
01:06:42.980 individuals
01:06:43.940 all right
01:06:46.800 locals
01:06:47.740 we got some
01:06:48.260 yeses and
01:06:48.740 noes
01:06:49.140 more yeses
01:06:50.140 than noes
01:06:50.660 on YouTube
01:06:52.800 lots of
01:06:54.940 yeses but
01:06:55.480 lots of
01:06:55.860 noes
01:06:56.260 pretty mixed
01:06:57.340 now the
01:06:59.480 people who
01:06:59.860 say no
01:07:00.420 what
01:07:02.520 what do
01:07:02.880 you
01:07:03.020 all right
01:07:04.980 I got to
01:07:05.340 call out
01:07:05.660 the idiot
01:07:06.100 the NPC
01:07:07.400 all right
01:07:07.980 somebody named
01:07:08.540 decadence
01:07:09.180 their comment
01:07:11.020 in all
01:07:11.520 capital letters
01:07:12.320 is arrogant
01:07:13.920 arrogant
01:07:15.320 oh
01:07:16.700 oh
01:07:17.540 arrogant
01:07:18.400 now you
01:07:19.940 fucking
01:07:20.280 idiot
01:07:20.640 I started
01:07:21.900 this by
01:07:22.320 saying it's
01:07:22.880 narcissistic
01:07:23.760 but it also
01:07:25.100 has some
01:07:25.580 utility
01:07:26.040 that is
01:07:28.120 just clearly
01:07:28.920 an NPC
01:07:29.680 you couldn't
01:07:30.820 possibly be
01:07:31.820 a real
01:07:32.420 functioning
01:07:32.960 human with
01:07:33.940 a fucking 0.88
01:07:34.440 brain
01:07:34.940 that you
01:07:36.220 thought
01:07:36.540 shouting that
01:07:37.300 in all
01:07:37.600 caps was
01:07:38.160 additive
01:07:38.600 or what
01:07:39.880 entertaining
01:07:40.660 like do
01:07:42.240 your fingers
01:07:42.720 just move
01:07:43.500 like
01:07:43.920 just
01:07:46.240 automatically
01:07:46.840 or something
01:07:47.440 my god
01:07:49.840 oh my god
01:07:53.340 now the
01:07:57.640 thing that
01:07:57.980 bothers me
01:07:58.500 is the
01:07:58.880 boredom
01:07:59.280 of it
01:07:59.680 I don't
01:08:00.900 know if
01:08:01.120 that's
01:08:01.320 coming
01:08:01.540 through
01:08:01.820 the
01:08:02.420 sheer
01:08:03.180 lack
01:08:04.140 of
01:08:04.360 creativity
01:08:04.940 actually
01:08:05.580 just
01:08:05.880 hurts
01:08:06.360 me
01:08:06.580 it's
01:08:06.700 like
01:08:06.880 oh
01:08:07.680 like
01:08:08.760 do
01:08:10.000 something
01:08:10.600 different
01:08:11.080 than
01:08:11.360 that
01:08:11.720 anything
01:08:12.960 just
01:08:13.740 anything
01:08:14.520 different
01:08:14.960 than
01:08:15.260 all
01:08:15.620 caps
01:08:16.040 agreeing
01:08:17.180 with
01:08:17.440 me
01:08:17.620 like
01:08:17.900 you're
01:08:18.160 disagreeing
01:08:18.960 arrogant
01:08:19.880 whoa
01:08:20.760 whoa
01:08:20.980 arrogant
01:08:21.440 oh
01:08:22.400 god
01:08:23.720 you're so
01:08:24.080 predictable
01:08:24.500 anyway
01:08:25.920 all right
01:08:28.040 so my
01:08:28.700 view is
01:08:29.180 that
01:08:29.360 anybody
01:08:29.680 who's
01:08:29.960 in the
01:08:30.200 top
01:08:30.420 20
01:08:30.820 people
01:08:31.360 who
01:08:31.760 influence
01:08:32.380 politics
01:08:32.920 is going
01:08:33.720 to be
01:08:33.920 targeted
01:08:34.300 for removal
01:08:35.160 either by
01:08:36.260 the left
01:08:36.640 or the
01:08:36.900 right
01:08:37.180 so everybody
01:08:38.140 who's in
01:08:38.540 that
01:08:38.920 top 20
01:08:40.500 influencer
01:08:41.060 group
01:08:41.480 by the
01:08:42.420 way
01:08:42.640 you did
01:08:43.860 see that
01:08:44.220 Mike
01:08:44.440 Cernovich
01:08:44.800 is almost
01:08:45.920 certainly
01:08:46.420 the reason
01:08:47.580 that DeSantis
01:08:48.220 made the
01:08:49.040 statement
01:08:49.480 he did
01:08:49.900 that didn't
01:08:51.140 mention
01:08:51.440 Trump
01:08:51.800 but it
01:08:52.120 was about
01:08:52.540 D.A.
01:08:53.720 Bragg
01:08:54.060 that was
01:08:55.640 entirely
01:08:56.240 in my
01:08:56.920 opinion
01:08:57.280 and I
01:08:58.100 think
01:08:58.380 Mike
01:08:59.000 Cernovich's
01:08:59.620 opinion
01:08:59.900 as well
01:09:00.340 that was
01:09:01.480 entirely
01:09:01.860 one person
01:09:02.620 and that
01:09:05.300 mattered
01:09:05.840 like that
01:09:07.320 that was
01:09:07.840 a moment
01:09:09.040 that the
01:09:09.580 whole
01:09:09.940 least the
01:09:10.600 right
01:09:10.860 was watching
01:09:11.500 the whole
01:09:12.000 world
01:09:12.280 really
01:09:12.520 that was
01:09:13.580 an important
01:09:14.440 framing
01:09:16.160 moment
01:09:17.100 and he
01:09:18.180 made that
01:09:18.600 happen
01:09:18.940 one person
01:09:20.080 so is
01:09:20.940 Mike
01:09:21.180 Cernovich
01:09:21.580 in the
01:09:22.100 top 20
01:09:22.840 people
01:09:23.180 who can
01:09:23.560 change
01:09:25.020 politics
01:09:25.600 oh yeah
01:09:27.360 yeah
01:09:29.360 he might
01:09:31.100 be in the
01:09:31.420 top three
01:09:32.060 he might
01:09:33.980 be in the
01:09:34.240 top one
01:09:34.840 you know
01:09:36.540 depending on
01:09:37.040 what the
01:09:37.320 topic is
01:09:37.900 and of
01:09:38.900 course
01:09:39.160 you know
01:09:39.760 some people
01:09:40.180 are more
01:09:40.480 influential
01:09:40.920 on some
01:09:41.380 topics
01:09:41.840 than others
01:09:42.360 but yeah
01:09:43.460 yeah
01:09:44.600 I mean
01:09:45.140 top 20
01:09:45.740 easily
01:09:46.240 top five
01:09:47.860 I would
01:09:48.220 argue
01:09:48.580 and if it
01:09:50.760 was top
01:09:51.360 two or
01:09:51.840 three
01:09:52.140 I wouldn't
01:09:52.520 even be
01:09:52.860 surprised
01:09:53.440 at all
01:09:54.480 all right
01:09:57.180 who else
01:10:01.440 is in that
01:10:01.960 category
01:10:02.400 of people
01:10:03.200 who are
01:10:03.400 not just
01:10:03.820 entertaining
01:10:04.320 but influential
01:10:06.540 that actually
01:10:07.900 like a
01:10:08.440 policy will
01:10:09.040 change
01:10:09.380 because of
01:10:10.580 something
01:10:10.900 Musk of 1.00
01:10:11.880 course
01:10:12.240 Tucker of
01:10:13.320 course
01:10:13.720 Steve Bannon
01:10:14.900 probably
01:10:15.980 Pasabek
01:10:18.000 probably
01:10:18.520 Russell Brand
01:10:19.840 I haven't
01:10:20.220 seen it yet
01:10:20.720 Gad Saad
01:10:21.400 I think he's
01:10:21.980 actually influenced
01:10:22.740 politics
01:10:23.240 I believe
01:10:24.140 Gad Saad
01:10:24.740 is another
01:10:25.140 one
01:10:25.420 yeah
01:10:25.760 you know
01:10:28.800 I haven't
01:10:29.280 seen Bill
01:10:29.700 Maher
01:10:30.080 influence
01:10:30.760 politics
01:10:31.400 I've seen
01:10:32.560 him say
01:10:32.880 things I
01:10:33.320 like
01:10:33.760 but I
01:10:34.840 haven't
01:10:35.020 seen it
01:10:35.320 change
01:10:35.700 much
01:10:36.140 yeah
01:10:36.840 Elon Musk
01:10:37.500 for sure
01:10:37.940 Jordan
01:10:38.300 Peterson
01:10:38.720 I don't
01:10:40.720 know
01:10:41.020 Jordan
01:10:41.720 Peterson
01:10:42.060 is
01:10:42.460 insanely
01:10:43.580 influential
01:10:45.160 on a
01:10:47.060 personal
01:10:47.460 development
01:10:48.100 kind of
01:10:48.980 way
01:10:49.100 but
01:10:49.300 politics
01:10:49.840 maybe
01:10:51.340 Bongino
01:10:53.220 David
01:10:54.960 Sachs
01:10:55.580 that's a
01:10:56.560 perfect
01:10:56.840 example
01:10:57.340 David
01:10:57.640 Sachs
01:10:58.280 yeah
01:10:59.000 Matt
01:10:59.280 Walsh
01:10:59.900 Joe
01:11:01.380 Rogan
01:11:01.820 Jonathan
01:11:02.920 Turley
01:11:03.420 Matt
01:11:04.700 Taibbi
01:11:05.160 now
01:11:05.580 Michael
01:11:06.340 Schellenberger
01:11:06.920 Michael
01:11:07.800 Schellenberger
01:11:08.340 is moving
01:11:08.820 the needle
01:11:09.240 a lot
01:11:09.840 yeah
01:11:11.120 I mean
01:11:11.500 I would
01:11:12.440 say
01:11:12.640 outside of
01:11:13.220 politics
01:11:13.780 yeah
01:11:14.420 so
01:11:14.660 Trump
01:11:15.380 and
01:11:15.660 you know
01:11:16.820 other people
01:11:17.480 are influential
01:11:18.200 in politics
01:11:18.900 Andrew Tate
01:11:20.320 less so
01:11:21.580 for American
01:11:22.120 politics
01:11:22.740 I don't
01:11:23.360 think
01:11:23.540 Andrew Tate
01:11:24.000 is
01:11:24.240 moving
01:11:25.420 the
01:11:25.740 bar
01:11:26.200 in
01:11:26.340 America
01:11:26.720 politics
01:11:28.600 Cory
01:11:30.340 DeAngelis
01:11:31.040 good
01:11:31.760 name
01:11:32.060 yes
01:11:32.400 Cory
01:11:32.760 DeAngelis
01:11:33.360 is
01:11:33.760 single-handedly
01:11:35.720 the
01:11:36.340 biggest
01:11:37.120 oh
01:11:38.220 yeah
01:11:39.540 James O'Keefe
01:11:40.320 it's a
01:11:41.660 sort of a
01:11:42.040 special case
01:11:42.640 but yes
01:11:43.160 Miranda 0.51
01:11:44.620 Divine
01:11:45.140 oh yeah
01:11:46.900 Ruffo
01:11:47.640 Ruffo
01:11:48.200 I don't
01:11:51.400 know about
01:11:52.060 Alex Jones
01:11:52.720 just because
01:11:55.000 I don't
01:11:55.740 follow the
01:11:56.300 show as
01:11:56.700 much
01:11:57.040 Mr. Beast
01:11:58.120 I don't
01:11:58.420 think so
01:11:58.900 Tom Fitton
01:12:02.120 well
01:12:05.200 I guess
01:12:06.800 I need
01:12:07.100 an example
01:12:07.600 of that
01:12:08.080 that could 0.68
01:12:09.540 he might
01:12:10.340 be changing
01:12:10.820 politics
01:12:11.380 alright
01:12:13.220 so
01:12:15.180 and yeah
01:12:16.360 Godfeld
01:12:16.780 of course
01:12:17.360 so
01:12:18.600 yeah
01:12:20.900 if
01:12:21.180 if you
01:12:22.180 if you
01:12:23.240 don't count
01:12:23.740 people who
01:12:24.320 are TV
01:12:25.080 hosts
01:12:26.360 or elected
01:12:27.720 politicians
01:12:28.360 or running
01:12:29.760 to be elected
01:12:30.380 there aren't
01:12:33.060 that many
01:12:33.420 people who
01:12:33.900 are moving
01:12:34.380 moving the
01:12:35.260 needle
01:12:35.520 who don't
01:12:36.940 have that
01:12:37.400 job
01:12:37.860 well I
01:12:38.320 suppose I
01:12:38.720 have that
01:12:39.040 job
01:12:39.360 in my
01:12:39.940 own way
01:12:40.440 Candace
01:12:42.480 Megan
01:12:42.780 Kelly
01:12:43.200 Sonny
01:12:45.000 Johnson
01:12:45.380 alright
01:12:45.960 seeing a lot
01:12:46.480 of names
01:12:46.800 but would
01:12:47.540 but would
01:12:47.980 you agree
01:12:48.420 that at
01:12:48.860 least
01:12:49.160 where it
01:12:50.960 concerns
01:12:51.600 Republican
01:12:53.400 related
01:12:54.080 stuff
01:12:55.120 would you
01:12:56.640 agree that
01:12:57.080 there are
01:12:57.320 about 20
01:12:58.040 people
01:12:58.460 who are
01:12:58.960 the one
01:12:59.260 Tim Pool
01:12:59.800 would you
01:13:00.640 agree there
01:13:00.960 are about
01:13:01.240 20 people
01:13:01.920 who make
01:13:02.300 a difference
01:13:02.780 and that
01:13:04.280 if the 20
01:13:04.840 who make
01:13:05.180 a difference
01:13:05.640 probably the
01:13:06.300 top 10
01:13:06.940 are 80%
01:13:09.140 of the
01:13:09.360 difference
01:13:09.720 yeah
01:13:11.660 top 10
01:13:12.180 are probably
01:13:12.500 80%
01:13:13.060 and top 20
01:13:13.780 are probably
01:13:14.660 all of it
01:13:15.340 probably just
01:13:16.760 about all
01:13:17.200 of it
01:13:17.520 oh yeah
01:13:18.280 Victor David
01:13:18.900 Hanson
01:13:19.260 good name
01:13:19.960 yeah
01:13:20.580 but you know
01:13:21.920 some of those
01:13:22.420 people are
01:13:22.860 famous
01:13:23.440 but not
01:13:24.780 influential
01:13:25.360 you know
01:13:28.300 what I mean
01:13:28.700 let
01:13:29.960 let
01:13:30.900 and I'll
01:13:31.540 use Victor
01:13:32.100 David Hanson
01:13:32.780 as an
01:13:33.360 example
01:13:33.720 I don't
01:13:34.320 know if
01:13:34.940 he's
01:13:35.140 influential
01:13:35.640 I know
01:13:37.060 he adds
01:13:37.660 a lot
01:13:37.940 to
01:13:38.120 conversations
01:13:38.820 like I
01:13:40.000 know that
01:13:40.480 if he
01:13:40.700 listened to
01:13:41.260 Victor David
01:13:41.780 Hanson
01:13:42.160 your understanding
01:13:43.460 of context
01:13:44.200 will be
01:13:44.720 improved
01:13:45.220 immediately
01:13:45.740 that might
01:13:47.460 change your
01:13:47.880 mind
01:13:48.080 about something
01:13:48.820 but he
01:13:49.740 but here's
01:13:50.400 why I'm
01:13:50.900 questioning
01:13:51.340 his influence
01:13:52.160 he pretty
01:13:54.140 much
01:13:54.520 is
01:13:55.100 right on
01:13:58.380 the
01:13:58.880 Republican
01:14:00.060 conservative
01:14:00.880 narrative
01:14:02.760 am I
01:14:04.060 wrong
01:14:04.340 so he
01:14:06.000 may be
01:14:06.880 adding
01:14:08.460 context
01:14:09.120 to help
01:14:09.580 people
01:14:10.040 to help
01:14:11.720 people
01:14:12.080 maybe
01:14:12.420 strengthen
01:14:12.980 their
01:14:13.260 arguments
01:14:13.740 and that's
01:14:15.620 valuable too
01:14:16.280 maybe that's
01:14:17.660 a form of
01:14:18.400 influence
01:14:18.880 but
01:14:20.140 the reason
01:14:22.620 somebody like
01:14:23.180 a Cernovich
01:14:23.780 has extra
01:14:24.840 juice
01:14:25.340 well there's
01:14:26.680 lots of
01:14:27.000 reasons he
01:14:27.400 has extra
01:14:27.840 juice
01:14:28.180 I mean
01:14:28.540 he's a
01:14:29.540 singular
01:14:29.920 personality
01:14:30.600 you can't
01:14:31.140 reproduce
01:14:31.440 him
01:14:31.720 and he
01:14:32.760 has
01:14:32.940 special
01:14:33.680 talents
01:14:34.160 but the
01:14:37.420 fact that
01:14:37.760 he's an
01:14:38.060 independent
01:14:38.500 and you
01:14:39.680 don't actually
01:14:40.360 know where
01:14:40.760 he's going
01:14:41.100 to come
01:14:41.360 out on
01:14:41.740 anything
01:14:42.180 have you
01:14:43.680 noticed
01:14:43.940 that
01:14:44.240 with
01:14:45.340 Cernovich
01:14:45.820 you never
01:14:46.300 really know
01:14:47.020 it could
01:14:49.360 sort of
01:14:49.700 go any
01:14:50.060 way
01:14:50.340 and his
01:14:51.740 unpredictability
01:14:52.660 is a big
01:14:53.600 part of his
01:14:54.080 appeal
01:14:54.360 so that's
01:14:55.440 more
01:14:55.660 persuasive
01:14:56.900 because when
01:14:58.200 he takes
01:14:58.600 what looks
01:14:59.740 to you
01:15:00.100 like a
01:15:00.520 contrarian
01:15:01.020 opinion
01:15:01.380 you stop
01:15:02.500 immediately
01:15:02.980 you go
01:15:04.080 oh
01:15:04.380 what's
01:15:05.200 this
01:15:05.460 what's
01:15:06.380 this
01:15:06.540 contrarian
01:15:07.100 opinion
01:15:07.380 I gotta
01:15:07.760 listen to
01:15:08.520 this
01:15:08.780 yeah so
01:15:10.160 he does
01:15:10.460 have
01:15:10.640 powers
01:15:11.020 that you
01:15:11.320 don't
01:15:11.460 have
01:15:11.820 how would
01:15:18.620 anyone know
01:15:19.060 the answer
01:15:19.560 yeah
01:15:19.960 Gordon Chang
01:15:25.220 yeah Gordon
01:15:26.760 Chang 1.00
01:15:27.220 has been
01:15:29.580 a consistent
01:15:30.420 China hawk
01:15:32.620 and yeah
01:15:34.160 he probably
01:15:34.520 has made
01:15:34.840 a difference
01:15:35.180 I think
01:15:35.480 you're right
01:15:35.780 and specifically
01:15:37.040 on one
01:15:37.740 topic
01:15:38.080 now some
01:15:38.820 people are
01:15:39.180 more influential
01:15:39.880 on some
01:15:40.400 topics than
01:15:41.180 others
01:15:41.540 right
01:15:43.160 so
01:15:44.060 yeah
01:15:47.740 all right
01:15:48.200 so that's
01:15:49.040 and PragerU
01:15:50.000 is influential
01:15:51.040 too
01:15:51.380 yes
01:15:51.760 all right
01:15:52.740 that's all
01:15:53.160 I got
01:15:53.340 for today
01:15:53.700 I'm gonna
01:15:53.980 say bye
01:15:54.440 to the
01:15:54.920 YouTube
01:15:55.260 people
01:15:55.680 it looked
01:15:56.420 like my
01:15:56.900 clever
01:15:57.340 Twitter
01:15:57.860 tweeting
01:15:58.520 tricks
01:15:58.900 didn't work
01:15:59.540 at all
01:15:59.860 looks like
01:16:00.480 the same
01:16:00.840 same size
01:16:02.020 crowd as
01:16:02.440 every day
01:16:02.780 so
01:16:03.920 I guess
01:16:05.020 now I
01:16:05.360 have a
01:16:05.600 question
01:16:05.880 whether
01:16:06.160 those
01:16:06.620 Twitter
01:16:08.200 algorithm
01:16:08.860 tricks
01:16:09.240 are real
01:16:09.680 because it
01:16:10.860 looks like
01:16:11.260 I just
01:16:11.560 tested it
01:16:12.160 it didn't
01:16:12.440 make any
01:16:12.820 difference
01:16:13.200 but
01:16:14.300 let's find
01:16:15.320 out
01:16:15.520 I won't
01:16:16.800 really see
01:16:17.220 the number
01:16:17.660 until I
01:16:18.380 quit you
01:16:19.160 on YouTube
01:16:19.580 and then
01:16:20.000 I'll tell
01:16:20.280 the locals
01:16:20.980 people what
01:16:21.460 it looked
01:16:21.700 like
01:16:22.020 bye for
01:16:23.360 now YouTube
01:16:23.760 thanks for
01:16:24.300 joining
01:16:24.540 best life