Real Coffee with Scott Adams - April 01, 2023


Episode 2065 Scott Adams: Twitter Ranking Formula, Tate Brothers Released, Trump Arraignment, Trans


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 16 minutes

Words per Minute

137.73474

Word Count

10,525

Sentence Count

231

Misogynist Sentences

28

Hate Speech Sentences

26


Summary

The Tate Brothers have been released from prison, but they are still under house arrest. I talk about why this is a good thing, and what to watch for when they get out of jail. I also talk about the upcoming Trump arraignment, and why I'm endorsing Joe Biden for president in 2024.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of civilization.
00:00:05.240 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and there's never been a finer experience.
00:00:11.320 If you're starting to tingle, that's why.
00:00:14.320 And if you'd like to take that tingle up to a full-blown throb,
00:00:18.640 all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or chalice or stein,
00:00:22.300 a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:26.200 Fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:00:29.040 I like coffee.
00:00:30.660 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.
00:00:32.980 It's the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better.
00:00:36.080 It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.
00:00:39.740 Go.
00:00:44.800 Ah.
00:00:47.560 Well, I'd like to start with an announcement.
00:00:52.880 Given the upcoming arraignment of ex-president Trump,
00:00:58.920 and because of his legal troubles, I'm changing my endorsement to Joe Biden.
00:01:07.660 Joe Biden.
00:01:09.180 So 2024, Biden.
00:01:12.160 Joe Biden.
00:01:14.060 Biden.
00:01:14.660 Biden.
00:01:15.080 Biden.
00:01:15.660 Biden.
00:01:17.660 Biden.
00:01:18.340 April Fool's.
00:01:21.480 April Fool's.
00:01:22.080 April Fool's.
00:01:23.480 All right.
00:01:25.020 All right.
00:01:25.100 I am trying today a new experiment that should garner us the most number of viewers ever.
00:01:34.800 I'm using the new, newly disclosed rules of Twitter's algorithm.
00:01:41.280 Well, the rules of what tweets get boosted to cleverly boost my tweet today using the new rules that have just been disclosed.
00:01:52.580 We'll talk about that in detail.
00:01:54.660 But watch the number count.
00:01:56.660 If I've correctly gamed the system, it'll be more people than we've ever had before.
00:02:02.680 Because the tweet will be more visible, I think.
00:02:05.880 We'll talk about that later.
00:02:07.580 Well, here's some big news.
00:02:09.480 The Tate brothers have been released from prison, but they're still in house arrest, I guess.
00:02:14.420 And here's what I have to say about it.
00:02:19.100 Now, you probably know I'm not a fan of the Tate brothers, mostly Andrew Tate.
00:02:25.340 I have a personal beef with him, but his story is interesting.
00:02:30.120 So I'm going to talk about it anyway.
00:02:32.760 And what I realized was he has the most interesting business model.
00:02:36.760 I tweeted about this.
00:02:38.600 Just think about Andrew Tate's business model.
00:02:40.900 According to his accusers, he taught women how to exploit men online,
00:02:47.540 while also teaching men how to avoid being exploited by women online and in general,
00:02:53.980 while also teaching men that it's easy to make money.
00:02:59.120 And he made money doing all three.
00:03:01.740 He made money teaching women how to scam men,
00:03:06.160 men how to avoid being scammed,
00:03:08.020 and then men how to make money easily.
00:03:13.140 And he did all three of them.
00:03:15.820 Apparently, he made money on all three.
00:03:18.800 That is the tightest business model I've ever seen.
00:03:21.700 I'm not saying you should, you know, emulate him.
00:03:25.580 I'm not saying he's a good person.
00:03:28.060 I'm just saying that's a hell of a business model.
00:03:31.140 That's all.
00:03:32.020 That's all I have to say about that.
00:03:34.160 But here's the interesting part.
00:03:36.080 If the Tates are on house arrest, will that allow them to do public media?
00:03:43.920 In other words, will he go back to live streaming as soon as he gets air cut?
00:03:50.280 I don't know.
00:03:51.420 So here's what you want to watch for with the Tates.
00:03:54.360 I don't know what they've done, if anything.
00:03:57.600 So I'm not personally aware of any crimes,
00:04:00.640 but they've been accused of quite bad things.
00:04:03.260 So while we don't know if those are real charges or trumped-up charges or what they are,
00:04:10.080 here's the interesting part of the story.
00:04:12.700 As I've told you before, Andrew Tate is very persuasive.
00:04:17.020 He has the actual tools of persuasion.
00:04:19.540 And as soon as he got out of jail,
00:04:22.000 as soon as he can talk,
00:04:25.260 it's going to change things.
00:04:26.660 In other words, we're going to get to see how capable he is.
00:04:32.900 Because I suspect there are some real legal risks here.
00:04:37.000 And if he can get out of them,
00:04:39.380 it will be quite a show.
00:04:41.040 I have to admit, it would be a hell of a show
00:04:43.140 if he somehow gets out of all of his legal problems.
00:04:46.360 But I think there's a chance.
00:04:48.900 I think there's actually a chance
00:04:50.420 he'll actually get away with everything.
00:04:52.540 Or maybe he didn't do anything.
00:04:54.480 That's technically illegal.
00:04:55.920 I don't know.
00:04:57.060 He certainly is accused of things that sound pretty heinous.
00:05:00.380 But I'm going to be watching this
00:05:02.600 both from a legal perspective,
00:05:05.440 but also just to see if his toolbox
00:05:07.940 is sufficient to get him out of this.
00:05:11.140 If it is, he's going to come back stronger.
00:05:14.460 And that would be interesting.
00:05:16.680 Because I do believe he is a risk to the system.
00:05:20.220 Would you agree with that?
00:05:21.880 I think he's a risk to the whole system.
00:05:24.420 Because the things he's saying are often provocative
00:05:28.540 and you can have your own opinions
00:05:30.880 about the ethics of it and all that.
00:05:33.280 But there is a certain truth to it
00:05:36.120 that is very disturbing to people
00:05:38.940 who don't want you to know those truths.
00:05:41.380 It's pretty interesting.
00:05:42.420 Here's my question.
00:05:47.040 There's a lot of news about these drag shows,
00:05:50.100 not only for children,
00:05:51.380 but for a lot of public officials and stuff.
00:05:54.280 A lot of drag shows.
00:05:56.080 And it made me wonder,
00:05:57.980 how many forms of live entertainment
00:06:00.220 are there for school children?
00:06:03.680 Because I was trying to think,
00:06:05.320 why is it that if you asked me to list
00:06:07.360 all of the live entertainment options
00:06:10.200 for school children,
00:06:11.620 I would only be able to think of one?
00:06:14.920 Well, you've got your trans activist dancing.
00:06:19.680 That's one.
00:06:21.220 What would be the second one?
00:06:25.060 No, I mean, that doesn't involve children.
00:06:28.140 You know, because children put on their own plays.
00:06:30.100 But what would be the...
00:06:31.500 What's the other one?
00:06:32.840 And why can't I name one?
00:06:33.920 And I'm wondering,
00:06:35.680 is it possible that there's also live entertainment
00:06:38.260 that would feature Republican men
00:06:41.540 dancing with traditional wives,
00:06:45.420 you know, in traditional, like, 50s garb?
00:06:49.780 Probably there is, right?
00:06:51.120 But I'm guessing that they don't get much attention
00:06:53.140 because they don't dance as well.
00:06:55.300 Probably.
00:06:55.980 They're probably just bad dancers,
00:06:57.360 so you don't hear about them.
00:06:58.980 Now, one of the things that impressed me
00:07:00.580 about the trans entertainers
00:07:02.420 is that they seem to get...
00:07:06.420 They have no problem getting booked for gigs,
00:07:08.660 apparently,
00:07:09.360 because we keep seeing video of them.
00:07:11.600 But other forms of dancing...
00:07:15.060 Correct me if I'm wrong.
00:07:16.100 I'm not really, like,
00:07:18.040 you know, big on the arts.
00:07:20.500 But most form of dancing,
00:07:22.160 don't you follow sort of a set pattern of movement?
00:07:25.520 Is that wrong?
00:07:27.240 Well, because the trans have a whole different way
00:07:30.320 of entertaining,
00:07:31.320 which apparently is very successful.
00:07:33.540 And I've been trying to learn how they do it.
00:07:37.360 And it looks freestyle.
00:07:40.460 Yeah, it's freestyle.
00:07:41.520 And I was wondering how hard it is.
00:07:44.300 So I thought I'd give you a little dance performance.
00:07:48.180 It's something I've learned from the trans community.
00:07:50.260 I'm not pretending to be trans.
00:07:52.120 That would be...
00:07:53.280 What would that be?
00:07:54.300 That would be called...
00:07:56.380 Cultural...
00:07:58.260 Something?
00:07:59.440 So I'm not doing that.
00:08:00.560 I'm just trying to learn from them
00:08:02.200 and pick up the tricks.
00:08:03.600 Because I was watching one of the trans dancers,
00:08:06.260 and it doesn't seem like there's too much to it.
00:08:10.800 I think I could probably...
00:08:12.880 A little stretching first.
00:08:15.620 All right.
00:08:16.160 All right, so I'm not pretending to be trans.
00:08:19.780 Not pretending to be trans.
00:08:21.900 I'm only learning from their technique.
00:08:23.800 All right, so I'm not pretending to be trans.
00:08:23.840 I'm only learning from their technique.
00:08:46.160 I think that was pretty good.
00:09:00.340 If you're listening to this...
00:09:02.480 Oh, damn it.
00:09:06.140 Damn it.
00:09:11.660 Sorry, locals.
00:09:12.680 I didn't notice my laptop fell over.
00:09:16.160 You're going to have to...
00:09:17.680 You're going to have to watch it on YouTube
00:09:20.520 or in replay.
00:09:22.320 On YouTube.
00:09:24.900 Whew.
00:09:27.160 Now,
00:09:28.320 I can kind of see how the kids like it.
00:09:34.120 It doesn't have rules.
00:09:36.360 Kids like that.
00:09:39.200 All right.
00:09:39.820 All right.
00:09:42.440 So I wonder what kind of live entertainment
00:09:44.840 would also be allowed.
00:09:45.920 Do you think if the military
00:09:47.280 had a dance troupe
00:09:50.080 that the military dance troupe
00:09:53.060 would be invited?
00:09:55.400 How about if police
00:09:56.780 had some kind of a cappella group?
00:10:01.740 Do you think the school children
00:10:03.100 would invite them to perform?
00:10:06.540 I don't know.
00:10:07.840 Or is it really the trans community
00:10:10.260 are the only ones
00:10:12.820 providing any live entertainment?
00:10:14.360 I don't know.
00:10:18.080 Anyway,
00:10:18.520 so AI has been banned in Italy.
00:10:23.220 Italy banned AI.
00:10:25.600 Specifically,
00:10:26.280 chat GPT,
00:10:28.000 open AI,
00:10:28.840 whatever it is.
00:10:30.100 And their problem was data security.
00:10:32.060 But I think it's the beginning.
00:10:37.700 I think I'm the only one predicting this.
00:10:40.980 Two predictions about AI.
00:10:43.920 Number one,
00:10:44.880 it will never be smart.
00:10:47.200 It will be an idiot savant.
00:10:50.220 And what I mean by that
00:10:51.320 is that it will do some things
00:10:52.800 extraordinarily well,
00:10:54.120 like play chess,
00:10:55.800 write code,
00:10:56.900 do math.
00:10:57.540 It's going to do some savant stuff
00:10:59.980 like really,
00:11:00.640 really well.
00:11:02.260 But it will never be smart
00:11:04.120 in a conversational way.
00:11:07.560 Because it can't be smarter than people.
00:11:11.320 I don't see any scenario
00:11:12.920 in which it can study people,
00:11:15.980 learn from people,
00:11:17.120 and then become
00:11:18.440 a super intelligence.
00:11:22.280 Have you ever wondered
00:11:23.320 about how that works?
00:11:26.280 I know you disagree.
00:11:27.460 And most people would.
00:11:30.220 So I'm basically,
00:11:31.220 I'm basically saying something
00:11:33.200 that I assume most people disagree.
00:11:36.300 My statement is
00:11:37.740 that except for those few
00:11:39.420 like STEM related,
00:11:41.640 very rule-based things,
00:11:44.580 like chess is rules-based,
00:11:46.380 programming is rules-based,
00:11:48.460 math is rules-based.
00:11:49.980 So once you get outside
00:11:51.100 of the rules-based scenario,
00:11:54.260 the only way that we train AI
00:11:56.340 is on humans.
00:11:59.240 If a human would say this,
00:12:01.420 then the AI will say it.
00:12:03.220 And there's no way
00:12:04.260 you can train something
00:12:05.680 to be super smart
00:12:07.000 by giving it infinite examples
00:12:09.900 of idiocy.
00:12:11.660 There's no amount of stupid
00:12:13.640 you could put into it
00:12:14.640 to make it smart.
00:12:15.500 And that is actually the plan.
00:12:18.860 The plan is if you add
00:12:20.260 enough stupidity
00:12:21.320 into a database,
00:12:23.440 the net effect will be
00:12:24.840 super intelligence.
00:12:27.620 Am I making that up?
00:12:30.140 That's real, right?
00:12:33.120 Am I just completely ignorant
00:12:35.700 about what AI is?
00:12:37.380 Or am I saying something
00:12:38.460 that's so obvious
00:12:39.600 that how else could it go?
00:12:43.180 So AI can't be more than
00:12:46.820 a bigoted, biased, stupid
00:12:51.120 personality.
00:12:54.020 But it will have some skills.
00:12:56.660 Its personality would just be
00:12:58.100 freaking idiot
00:12:58.900 because it's going to be
00:12:59.980 based on people.
00:13:01.320 Now, if it's not an idiot,
00:13:03.360 how could it not be an idiot?
00:13:05.320 Well, one way would be
00:13:08.280 if the smart people
00:13:09.460 who developed it
00:13:10.400 gave it limitations
00:13:12.140 and said,
00:13:13.560 all right,
00:13:14.320 you're not going to be allowed
00:13:15.720 to say anything
00:13:16.720 that QAnon says
00:13:18.020 or anything that Antifa says.
00:13:20.620 Black Lives Matter is fine
00:13:24.160 and we love trans community
00:13:26.800 and basically you're just
00:13:29.980 going to get one person's
00:13:31.200 or some small group
00:13:32.260 of people's opinion
00:13:33.180 of what is good
00:13:33.920 and what is bad.
00:13:35.720 So your best case scenario
00:13:37.200 is that AI is like
00:13:38.380 the few people who created it
00:13:40.100 because they limit
00:13:41.540 what it can and cannot do
00:13:42.720 or it's just stupid
00:13:44.560 because it's some average
00:13:46.500 of stupid people.
00:13:47.360 So it's either going to be
00:13:52.300 illegal or stupid
00:13:53.480 but really good at math
00:13:55.700 and a few technical things
00:13:58.100 that are useful.
00:14:01.520 You think AI is running the show?
00:14:04.020 I don't.
00:14:05.480 I don't.
00:14:06.880 Yeah, I've lost all faith in AI.
00:14:10.000 Isn't that weird?
00:14:11.460 It's supposed to be going
00:14:12.360 in the other direction
00:14:13.080 where I'm supposed to be
00:14:14.040 wowed by its capabilities.
00:14:15.500 I'm absolutely convinced
00:14:18.020 it's useless
00:14:18.620 except for rules-based things
00:14:22.200 where it can be very smart.
00:14:25.180 Yeah.
00:14:25.760 Now it might be
00:14:26.820 like an interesting companion
00:14:28.140 just because it's stupid.
00:14:30.100 You know, you think
00:14:30.900 oh, that's just like a person.
00:14:32.820 But I don't think
00:14:33.860 we're going to put up
00:14:34.560 with stupidity in machines.
00:14:36.660 We barely put up
00:14:38.060 with stupidity in other humans.
00:14:40.660 It's going to be
00:14:41.420 real hard to take
00:14:42.240 if your machine
00:14:42.920 starts acting dumb
00:14:43.920 in front of you.
00:14:44.500 It's like,
00:14:45.200 ah, I'm paying for you.
00:14:47.020 I don't want to pay
00:14:47.880 for you to say dumb stuff
00:14:49.020 right in front of me.
00:14:51.600 You know,
00:14:51.840 if you're a Republican
00:14:53.560 maybe you don't get along
00:14:54.740 with Democrats
00:14:55.460 but do you want to sit
00:14:56.860 in the same room
00:14:57.540 for a long period of time
00:14:58.720 talking about politics?
00:15:01.500 Probably not.
00:15:02.580 No.
00:15:03.060 So you're either
00:15:03.580 going to make
00:15:04.000 your version of AI
00:15:05.820 let's say your personal
00:15:07.020 one you're using
00:15:07.760 you're either going to make it
00:15:09.080 follow your personality
00:15:10.400 which seems likely.
00:15:12.460 you're not going to make it
00:15:14.220 opposite of your opinions
00:15:15.780 or you wouldn't pay for it
00:15:17.720 or you wouldn't talk to it.
00:15:20.200 I know.
00:15:21.000 I've got a feeling
00:15:21.520 that everything we predict
00:15:22.720 about AI is wrong.
00:15:25.680 Which, by the way,
00:15:26.700 is the universal
00:15:27.620 smartest opinion
00:15:29.580 on anything new.
00:15:30.720 that's kind of cheating.
00:15:34.280 You can take anything
00:15:35.380 that's brand new
00:15:36.120 and complicated
00:15:36.720 and you can just say
00:15:38.420 I've got a prediction
00:15:39.580 that in 10 years
00:15:41.480 our view about this
00:15:43.240 new and complicated thing
00:15:44.700 will be very different
00:15:46.080 than it is right now.
00:15:47.720 And you would be right
00:15:48.800 every time.
00:15:50.940 Right?
00:15:51.440 So if you just took
00:15:52.920 everything we think
00:15:54.060 about AI at the moment
00:15:55.460 it's probably all wrong.
00:15:58.080 It's probably all wrong.
00:15:59.580 We just own
00:16:00.660 what is right.
00:16:03.600 But we should treat it
00:16:04.880 like we do know
00:16:05.860 that it has a risk.
00:16:08.140 So I don't know
00:16:08.980 if Italy will be
00:16:09.940 the first to ban it
00:16:11.360 but now there's a
00:16:12.340 chat GPT
00:16:14.080 had some fairly minor
00:16:16.060 data security problem
00:16:17.400 and that'll scare people.
00:16:19.600 Elon Musk
00:16:20.240 Oh, here,
00:16:20.760 this is interesting.
00:16:22.100 Apparently Elon Musk
00:16:23.440 has already started
00:16:25.220 recruiting AI programmers.
00:16:28.080 Do you see where
00:16:30.080 that's going?
00:16:32.000 So Musk was part
00:16:33.380 of the original
00:16:34.300 what he thought
00:16:34.940 was going to be
00:16:35.480 a publicly available
00:16:37.360 non-profit AI thing
00:16:39.320 open AI
00:16:40.000 but he left
00:16:41.560 because it turned
00:16:42.480 commercial
00:16:43.140 and that was the
00:16:43.900 opposite of what he wanted.
00:16:45.660 He wanted an AI
00:16:46.580 that would just compete
00:16:47.340 with Google
00:16:47.940 and be available
00:16:49.700 to everybody
00:16:50.320 sort of open source.
00:16:52.760 What it became
00:16:53.500 sort of
00:16:54.080 some would say
00:16:55.340 captured by Microsoft
00:16:56.580 because they put
00:16:57.340 an enormous investment
00:16:58.480 into it.
00:16:59.380 Now they don't have
00:17:00.140 a board member
00:17:00.780 and they have
00:17:03.260 less than half
00:17:04.080 of the shares
00:17:05.020 but I don't see
00:17:07.540 how they could
00:17:08.120 not influence it
00:17:09.340 with that much money.
00:17:11.220 So obviously
00:17:11.700 Microsoft has
00:17:12.480 some influence
00:17:12.980 over it,
00:17:14.280 et cetera.
00:17:14.880 I think Musk
00:17:15.920 is going to compete
00:17:16.740 with it
00:17:17.220 and I think Musk
00:17:18.640 is going to build
00:17:19.300 the non-woke version
00:17:21.100 because he's complained
00:17:22.720 specifically
00:17:23.420 about AI being woke
00:17:25.140 and what he said was
00:17:26.920 if AI is woke
00:17:28.360 it will be a liar.
00:17:31.180 Now that's as direct
00:17:32.580 as you could possibly be.
00:17:34.500 If you make AI woke
00:17:36.080 like humans
00:17:37.360 it will be a liar
00:17:39.320 like humans.
00:17:42.260 And what would be the point
00:17:43.180 of building a liar?
00:17:44.380 Who would do that?
00:17:45.840 That's what we're doing.
00:17:47.180 We're actually building
00:17:48.340 a liar.
00:17:49.260 We're building
00:17:49.960 the smartest liar
00:17:51.080 that's ever existed.
00:17:53.420 And right in front of us
00:17:54.860 because it is limited
00:17:56.980 in what it can say.
00:17:59.200 It cannot do a poem
00:18:00.720 that is positive
00:18:01.620 for Trump
00:18:02.380 but it can do a poem
00:18:03.880 that's positive
00:18:04.540 for Biden.
00:18:06.000 That's all you need
00:18:06.840 to know.
00:18:08.480 One is inappropriate
00:18:09.500 and the other
00:18:10.040 oh yeah sure
00:18:10.680 I can do a poem
00:18:12.360 praising Biden.
00:18:13.480 No problem.
00:18:14.980 No problem.
00:18:17.180 Alright.
00:18:18.420 So that'll be interesting.
00:18:19.780 I think the
00:18:20.260 you know
00:18:21.780 it's enormously expensive.
00:18:23.420 but he can afford it
00:18:24.280 if he wants.
00:18:24.820 So if Musk
00:18:25.880 builds his own
00:18:26.860 competing AI
00:18:27.820 now I think
00:18:28.920 he already has AI
00:18:29.800 right?
00:18:30.260 It's already in his
00:18:30.960 the Tesla
00:18:31.820 but it's a
00:18:33.180 it's a
00:18:34.060 different version.
00:18:35.560 It's more for
00:18:36.140 recognizing landscape
00:18:37.680 and navigating.
00:18:39.580 It's not so much
00:18:40.600 the language based one.
00:18:42.420 So maybe he's adding
00:18:43.560 the language based stuff.
00:18:44.800 Who knows?
00:18:46.400 Alright let's talk
00:18:46.920 about the Trump charges.
00:18:48.640 Allegedly Trump
00:18:49.360 will be arraigned
00:18:50.120 on Tuesday.
00:18:53.160 So there are
00:18:53.940 30 some charges.
00:18:56.180 What do you think
00:18:57.480 are the odds
00:18:58.640 that there are charges
00:18:59.520 we haven't heard about?
00:19:01.520 What are the odds?
00:19:03.640 Do you think
00:19:04.240 because the only thing
00:19:05.220 we know
00:19:05.560 are leaks
00:19:06.320 that are
00:19:06.740 not really
00:19:07.880 not really dependable.
00:19:10.300 so do you think
00:19:12.100 the leaks
00:19:12.620 are nailed it
00:19:13.760 that it's just
00:19:14.320 some kind of
00:19:16.000 you know
00:19:16.340 creative
00:19:17.100 creative prosecution
00:19:19.440 that turns
00:19:20.500 something into
00:19:21.200 a felony
00:19:22.180 that wouldn't
00:19:22.880 otherwise be a felony
00:19:23.920 and somehow
00:19:25.600 he extended
00:19:26.380 the statute
00:19:27.040 of limitations
00:19:27.780 and it's all
00:19:29.100 sketchy
00:19:29.600 or do you think
00:19:30.360 that they also
00:19:31.320 maybe in addition
00:19:33.160 to that
00:19:33.600 or instead of
00:19:34.440 do you think
00:19:34.780 they have something
00:19:35.260 real?
00:19:36.600 Something they could
00:19:37.320 stand up in court
00:19:38.200 and people would say
00:19:39.160 oh okay that's
00:19:40.060 that's real
00:19:40.500 I
00:19:42.640 it could go
00:19:45.000 either way
00:19:45.620 I think it could
00:19:47.360 go either way
00:19:48.120 but if I had to
00:19:49.300 bet on it
00:19:49.960 just for fun
00:19:51.380 I would bet
00:19:52.520 it's not real
00:19:53.220 I would bet
00:19:54.600 that
00:19:55.280 Jonathan Turley
00:19:57.460 has exactly
00:19:58.220 the right take
00:19:58.940 which is
00:19:59.660 there's no question
00:20:00.900 that it's a
00:20:01.500 political prosecution
00:20:02.560 meaning that
00:20:04.180 the charges
00:20:04.700 would be the kind
00:20:05.640 you wouldn't bring
00:20:06.280 on other people
00:20:07.600 it's just sort of
00:20:08.780 a Trump specific
00:20:09.860 prosecution
00:20:11.020 that's my best guess
00:20:14.980 my best guess
00:20:15.820 is that
00:20:16.260 it is
00:20:16.820 perfectly political
00:20:18.240 and the charges
00:20:19.500 will be weak
00:20:20.300 exactly like you think
00:20:22.240 but
00:20:23.280 but just be aware
00:20:24.940 we could be
00:20:26.040 totally wrong
00:20:26.740 because
00:20:28.340 if you come back
00:20:29.120 to me on Wednesday
00:20:29.800 and say
00:20:30.180 Scott
00:20:30.760 he had all these
00:20:32.400 surprise charges
00:20:33.360 and you said
00:20:34.020 he wouldn't
00:20:34.440 I'm not
00:20:35.320 I wouldn't be surprised
00:20:36.360 by that
00:20:36.880 I think it's like
00:20:38.340 a 60-40
00:20:39.220 60% chance
00:20:41.300 is just what
00:20:42.020 you think it is
00:20:42.740 weak charges
00:20:44.220 and a 40% chance
00:20:46.400 they surprise us
00:20:47.520 but that's a pretty
00:20:49.560 big difference
00:20:50.140 60 and 40
00:20:51.080 alright
00:20:52.440 so far
00:20:56.720 the only effect
00:20:57.900 on Trump
00:20:58.400 is he's raised
00:20:59.180 a lot more money
00:21:00.100 for the campaign
00:21:01.040 and the polls
00:21:03.640 have improved
00:21:05.020 for him substantially
00:21:06.120 like
00:21:07.280 really substantially
00:21:08.400 do you think
00:21:10.320 that is a
00:21:10.840 lasting effect
00:21:11.800 or do you think
00:21:13.760 or
00:21:15.000 is it just
00:21:16.160 a temporary bounce
00:21:17.220 lasting effect
00:21:19.340 or temporary bounce
00:21:20.260 well
00:21:21.040 some of it
00:21:22.700 depends if he's still
00:21:23.800 if he's still
00:21:24.940 battling it
00:21:25.820 during the election
00:21:27.620 you know
00:21:29.180 what would be
00:21:29.520 the best
00:21:30.100 Trump campaign
00:21:31.340 I could ever
00:21:31.880 think of
00:21:32.340 he goes to
00:21:34.860 court every day
00:21:35.660 on trumped up
00:21:37.180 charges
00:21:37.600 just that
00:21:39.540 just seeing him
00:21:41.160 in court
00:21:41.520 every day
00:21:42.140 and having
00:21:43.180 the
00:21:43.680 you know
00:21:44.460 the right
00:21:44.900 leaning commentator
00:21:45.760 say
00:21:46.060 well it's a
00:21:47.020 political prosecution
00:21:48.040 this is how
00:21:49.520 Biden is running
00:21:50.320 for president
00:21:50.900 by using the
00:21:52.240 machinery of
00:21:52.980 government
00:21:53.460 indirectly
00:21:54.420 because he
00:21:54.840 doesn't directly
00:21:55.560 you know
00:21:56.420 Biden doesn't
00:21:57.680 control the
00:21:58.340 the DA
00:21:58.960 but
00:22:00.060 collectively
00:22:02.240 they seem to be
00:22:03.120 acting as one
00:22:04.040 which is not
00:22:05.600 a coincidence
00:22:06.080 and
00:22:07.900 Trump could win
00:22:10.480 by just being
00:22:11.320 in court
00:22:11.900 when he should be
00:22:13.480 you know
00:22:14.920 when he should be
00:22:15.720 campaigning
00:22:16.620 because the thing
00:22:17.520 about Trump is
00:22:18.300 he's releasing
00:22:19.140 all his policy
00:22:19.920 stuff on videos
00:22:20.940 which I think
00:22:21.920 is strong
00:22:22.600 that's a very
00:22:23.620 good technique
00:22:24.340 and you know
00:22:25.780 exactly where
00:22:26.420 he stands
00:22:26.900 on pretty much
00:22:27.520 everything
00:22:27.880 he doesn't
00:22:29.280 need to
00:22:29.640 campaign that
00:22:30.280 much
00:22:30.520 he just
00:22:30.840 needs to
00:22:31.140 be visible
00:22:31.700 it would be
00:22:32.620 an interesting
00:22:33.060 way to make
00:22:33.560 him visible
00:22:34.060 as a
00:22:35.340 target of
00:22:36.740 political
00:22:37.520 chicanery
00:22:39.160 so that could
00:22:40.900 happen
00:22:41.220 all right
00:22:41.780 Wall Street
00:22:42.400 Journal did
00:22:42.860 a poll
00:22:43.140 and here's
00:22:44.680 how they
00:22:45.060 framed it
00:22:45.700 which I think
00:22:46.160 is the wrong
00:22:46.700 frame
00:22:47.120 listen to this
00:22:47.940 sentence
00:22:48.360 66% of
00:22:50.000 Democrats
00:22:50.500 think indictment
00:22:51.540 is motivated
00:22:52.260 is motivated
00:22:55.380 by the law
00:22:56.240 all right
00:22:56.980 so in other
00:22:58.180 words
00:22:58.360 two-thirds
00:22:58.900 of Democrats
00:23:00.020 think that
00:23:01.260 the Trump
00:23:01.640 indictment
00:23:02.100 is not
00:23:02.540 political
00:23:03.040 not political
00:23:04.720 that it's just
00:23:05.760 nobody's above
00:23:06.800 the law
00:23:07.240 do you think
00:23:09.240 that's the way
00:23:09.720 to report
00:23:11.240 that news
00:23:11.880 that two-thirds
00:23:13.200 of Democrats
00:23:13.860 think everything's
00:23:14.680 going right
00:23:15.200 everything's fine
00:23:17.080 here's the other
00:23:18.920 way to say
00:23:19.820 the same thing
00:23:20.700 breaking one
00:23:23.680 of the longest
00:23:24.260 patterns that
00:23:25.460 we've ever
00:23:25.880 seen
00:23:26.320 one-third of
00:23:27.980 Democrats
00:23:28.400 actually agree
00:23:29.500 with Republicans
00:23:30.300 that this is
00:23:31.100 totally political
00:23:31.900 where have you
00:23:33.940 ever seen
00:23:34.580 one-third of
00:23:35.360 Democrats agree
00:23:36.240 with Republicans
00:23:37.020 I mean I
00:23:38.700 sure it happens
00:23:40.000 but it's pretty
00:23:40.520 rare
00:23:40.840 right
00:23:41.780 shouldn't the
00:23:42.700 headline be
00:23:43.360 an unprecedented
00:23:44.320 number of
00:23:45.440 Democrats
00:23:46.360 understand that
00:23:47.400 this is a
00:23:47.940 political
00:23:48.380 thing
00:23:49.240 and let me
00:23:49.900 ask you a
00:23:50.260 second question
00:23:50.900 do you think
00:23:52.220 that the
00:23:52.560 Democrats
00:23:53.060 who said
00:23:53.480 oh no
00:23:54.260 this is
00:23:55.320 totally about
00:23:55.980 the law
00:23:56.680 it's only
00:23:57.780 about the
00:23:58.260 law
00:23:58.680 there's nothing
00:23:59.700 political
00:24:00.300 about this
00:24:01.100 how many
00:24:01.840 of them
00:24:02.140 believed
00:24:02.880 what they
00:24:03.300 said
00:24:03.640 maybe none
00:24:07.040 maybe zero
00:24:08.520 yeah
00:24:10.100 so I think
00:24:11.320 I think the
00:24:11.980 real story
00:24:12.500 here
00:24:12.800 is that even
00:24:13.860 Democrats
00:24:14.540 even Democrats
00:24:15.980 can clearly see
00:24:17.260 this as a
00:24:17.820 political
00:24:18.260 indictment
00:24:19.260 shouldn't that
00:24:20.920 be the story
00:24:21.540 if one-third
00:24:23.560 of Democrats
00:24:24.260 are on the
00:24:24.660 same side
00:24:25.120 as Republicans
00:24:25.800 the story
00:24:27.740 is the ones
00:24:28.240 who are on
00:24:28.520 the same
00:24:28.820 side
00:24:29.120 not the
00:24:29.480 ones who
00:24:29.740 disagree
00:24:30.120 it's like
00:24:31.300 a backwards
00:24:31.780 report
00:24:32.340 do you see
00:24:34.100 it too
00:24:34.400 or am I
00:24:34.760 just babbling
00:24:35.780 is that point
00:24:37.980 clear
00:24:38.360 that it's
00:24:39.600 reported
00:24:40.000 backwards
00:24:40.520 yeah
00:24:41.540 and that's
00:24:42.820 the Wall
00:24:43.080 Street Journal
00:24:43.560 who you
00:24:44.020 wouldn't expect
00:24:44.580 to be
00:24:45.080 super lefty
00:24:46.500 all right
00:24:49.100 93% of
00:24:50.840 Republicans
00:24:51.240 and 70%
00:24:52.400 of independent
00:24:53.040 voters
00:24:53.640 think it's
00:24:55.020 motivated by
00:24:55.800 politics
00:24:56.380 70%
00:24:58.180 of independent
00:24:59.200 voters
00:24:59.740 what percent
00:25:01.380 of independent
00:25:02.160 voters
00:25:02.640 normally
00:25:03.360 go left
00:25:04.340 versus
00:25:04.760 normally
00:25:05.260 go right
00:25:05.820 because they're
00:25:06.240 pretty dependable
00:25:06.920 usually
00:25:07.280 is it
00:25:10.100 close to
00:25:11.000 half
00:25:11.340 I don't know
00:25:12.520 what it is
00:25:13.040 but that
00:25:14.820 I can't
00:25:15.760 believe that
00:25:16.160 70%
00:25:16.860 are typically
00:25:17.820 on Trump's
00:25:18.760 side
00:25:19.100 that's not
00:25:20.700 common
00:25:21.080 right
00:25:21.420 it's not
00:25:22.340 normal that
00:25:22.880 70% of
00:25:23.860 independents
00:25:24.440 would be
00:25:24.780 pro-Trump
00:25:25.320 I don't
00:25:26.400 think so
00:25:27.020 so
00:25:29.040 they're
00:25:29.400 center-left
00:25:29.920 right
00:25:30.260 they lean
00:25:30.960 just
00:25:31.220 slightly
00:25:31.720 left
00:25:32.120 is that
00:25:32.600 about
00:25:32.780 right
00:25:33.120 60-40
00:25:34.800 Democrat
00:25:35.360 somebody
00:25:36.200 says
00:25:36.600 that sounds
00:25:38.060 right
00:25:38.340 I don't
00:25:38.640 know if
00:25:38.860 that's
00:25:39.060 right
00:25:39.300 but
00:25:40.360 to me
00:25:40.940 these are
00:25:41.380 gigantic
00:25:41.900 numbers
00:25:42.520 suggesting
00:25:43.220 that Trump
00:25:43.860 should win
00:25:44.580 the presidency
00:25:45.400 fairly easily
00:25:46.780 but it's
00:25:48.920 impossible to
00:25:49.640 predict at
00:25:50.120 this point
00:25:50.540 all right
00:25:51.220 here's my
00:25:51.640 take on
00:25:52.180 whether
00:25:52.500 the
00:25:52.980 this
00:25:54.360 situation
00:25:54.940 will matter
00:25:56.020 to the
00:25:56.440 final election
00:25:57.220 no
00:25:58.860 no
00:26:00.140 won't matter
00:26:00.680 won't make
00:26:01.820 any difference
00:26:02.360 here's why
00:26:03.780 if you
00:26:05.840 wanted
00:26:06.240 to want
00:26:07.300 Trump
00:26:08.040 you had
00:26:08.560 lots of
00:26:08.900 reasons
00:26:09.260 you didn't
00:26:10.120 need any
00:26:10.440 new reasons
00:26:11.040 if you
00:26:12.200 wanted to
00:26:12.660 dislike
00:26:13.060 Trump
00:26:13.520 you had
00:26:14.260 lots of
00:26:14.640 reasons
00:26:15.000 you didn't
00:26:16.020 need a
00:26:16.300 new reason
00:26:16.860 nobody
00:26:18.460 needed a
00:26:19.020 new reason
00:26:19.440 for anything
00:26:19.920 there's no
00:26:21.140 new reasons
00:26:21.840 all of our
00:26:23.300 old reasons
00:26:23.960 are just
00:26:24.880 as good
00:26:25.280 as they
00:26:25.560 need to
00:26:25.900 be
00:26:26.120 now
00:26:27.140 the other
00:26:27.740 but the
00:26:28.120 one thing
00:26:28.480 that could
00:26:28.860 change
00:26:29.320 is motivation
00:26:30.760 to actually
00:26:31.340 vote
00:26:31.740 that could
00:26:34.500 change
00:26:34.900 because I
00:26:36.120 have to
00:26:36.580 say
00:26:36.860 I felt
00:26:38.280 more likely
00:26:38.900 to vote
00:26:39.460 because
00:26:40.240 it made
00:26:40.780 me angry
00:26:41.400 and anger
00:26:42.940 is not
00:26:43.280 really your
00:26:43.740 best reason
00:26:44.700 for voting
00:26:45.260 but I'm
00:26:46.460 glad we
00:26:46.780 have the
00:26:47.020 option
00:26:47.280 so I've
00:26:49.280 got a
00:26:49.500 feeling
00:26:49.700 that there
00:26:50.020 will be
00:26:50.320 25
00:26:51.000 outrages
00:26:51.820 far bigger
00:26:52.780 than this
00:26:53.400 between now
00:26:54.480 and election
00:26:54.880 day
00:26:55.160 you won't
00:26:56.820 even remember
00:26:57.380 this
00:26:57.780 it'll just
00:26:59.200 be completely
00:26:59.820 cleared out
00:27:00.440 of your
00:27:00.620 memory banks
00:27:01.300 there'll be
00:27:02.240 10 new
00:27:03.240 fake news
00:27:05.200 stories about
00:27:05.880 Trump
00:27:06.200 and Trump
00:27:07.560 will do
00:27:08.080 10
00:27:08.800 outrageous
00:27:09.400 things that
00:27:10.080 you can't
00:27:10.460 imagine he
00:27:10.920 said
00:27:11.220 and then
00:27:12.420 there'll be
00:27:12.880 10 emergencies
00:27:13.900 in the world
00:27:14.580 that you
00:27:14.880 didn't see
00:27:15.260 coming
00:27:15.600 it's just
00:27:18.020 going to be
00:27:18.340 nothing but
00:27:18.800 twists and
00:27:19.240 turns
00:27:19.540 so no
00:27:20.320 I don't
00:27:20.620 think it'll
00:27:20.940 have any
00:27:21.260 difference
00:27:21.640 the only
00:27:22.520 difference
00:27:22.840 will be
00:27:23.320 that Trump
00:27:24.440 got a
00:27:25.060 fundraising
00:27:25.940 boost
00:27:26.520 he got a
00:27:30.840 fundraising
00:27:31.280 boost
00:27:31.800 and
00:27:32.800 it may
00:27:34.820 freeze
00:27:35.400 DeSantis
00:27:35.980 out at
00:27:36.380 the
00:27:36.480 primaries
00:27:36.980 if it
00:27:38.680 has any
00:27:39.200 effect
00:27:39.720 it'll be
00:27:40.600 a short
00:27:40.960 term
00:27:41.140 effect
00:27:41.520 but in
00:27:42.500 the short
00:27:42.860 term
00:27:43.220 it can
00:27:44.240 certainly
00:27:44.520 make
00:27:44.780 DeSantis
00:27:45.240 pause
00:27:46.140 his
00:27:47.200 campaign
00:27:47.800 plans
00:27:49.020 don't you
00:27:49.400 think
00:27:49.700 if you
00:27:50.880 were
00:27:51.020 DeSantis
00:27:51.540 wouldn't
00:27:52.460 you wait
00:27:52.880 to see
00:27:53.180 how this
00:27:53.480 plays
00:27:53.760 out
00:27:54.060 because
00:27:55.540 if he
00:27:55.760 gets
00:27:55.940 convicted
00:27:56.380 you might
00:27:57.120 say
00:27:57.340 I better
00:27:58.240 get in
00:27:58.700 if he
00:27:59.940 doesn't
00:28:00.340 get
00:28:00.520 convicted
00:28:00.960 and it
00:28:01.480 just
00:28:01.640 raises
00:28:02.000 his
00:28:02.280 popularity
00:28:02.800 with
00:28:03.100 his
00:28:03.260 base
00:28:03.600 you better
00:28:04.860 stay
00:28:05.160 out
00:28:05.480 so I
00:28:07.560 think
00:28:07.820 DeSantis
00:28:08.960 is
00:28:09.300 planning
00:28:10.180 to run
00:28:10.800 but also
00:28:12.000 wait and
00:28:12.480 see
00:28:12.660 meaning he
00:28:13.720 won't
00:28:13.960 execute
00:28:14.500 depending on
00:28:15.840 how things
00:28:16.260 go
00:28:16.560 that's what
00:28:17.760 I see
00:28:18.100 even
00:28:20.020 Mike Pence
00:28:20.760 who is
00:28:21.480 not the
00:28:22.120 best
00:28:22.660 friend
00:28:23.560 of
00:28:23.880 Trump
00:28:24.400 at this
00:28:24.820 point
00:28:25.120 because
00:28:25.580 of
00:28:25.760 January 6
00:28:26.460 etc
00:28:27.140 and
00:28:28.500 Pence
00:28:29.060 is even
00:28:29.520 thinking
00:28:30.600 about running
00:28:31.200 against
00:28:31.620 Trump
00:28:31.960 so he's
00:28:33.400 not the
00:28:33.740 one who's
00:28:34.060 going to
00:28:34.340 defend
00:28:34.700 Trump
00:28:35.180 but
00:28:35.900 may I
00:28:36.960 say
00:28:37.220 again
00:28:37.660 that
00:28:39.040 although
00:28:39.400 I don't
00:28:39.860 want
00:28:40.080 Mike Pence
00:28:40.620 to be
00:28:40.920 my
00:28:41.140 president
00:28:41.600 my
00:28:42.660 God
00:28:42.960 he impresses
00:28:43.560 me
00:28:43.800 once
00:28:45.440 again
00:28:45.840 Mike Pence
00:28:47.000 did the
00:28:47.600 stand up
00:28:48.800 correct thing
00:28:50.520 for the
00:28:50.960 country
00:28:51.320 and it
00:28:52.360 wasn't in
00:28:52.800 his best
00:28:53.160 interest
00:28:53.580 wasn't in
00:28:55.200 his best
00:28:55.560 interest
00:28:55.960 maybe it
00:28:56.940 was
00:28:57.240 I mean
00:28:57.640 because I
00:28:58.100 you know
00:28:58.540 I respect
00:28:59.120 him for
00:28:59.460 it
00:28:59.580 maybe it
00:28:59.940 was
00:29:00.140 but I
00:29:00.740 don't
00:29:00.840 think
00:29:00.980 he's
00:29:01.180 going to
00:29:01.380 get
00:29:01.500 elected
00:29:01.840 or anything
00:29:02.300 because of
00:29:02.840 it
00:29:03.040 so
00:29:04.360 Mike Pence
00:29:05.240 once again
00:29:06.220 you have
00:29:06.600 proven a
00:29:07.320 model of
00:29:08.220 human
00:29:09.920 behavior
00:29:10.400 I won't
00:29:11.060 even say
00:29:11.380 Republican
00:29:11.900 I'll say
00:29:12.980 he's a
00:29:13.420 model of
00:29:14.260 good human
00:29:14.860 behavior
00:29:15.320 I really
00:29:16.460 appreciate that
00:29:17.080 from him
00:29:17.480 don't want
00:29:18.900 him to
00:29:19.080 be my
00:29:19.400 president
00:29:19.720 but as
00:29:20.340 a human
00:29:20.820 he does
00:29:21.840 set a
00:29:22.100 good
00:29:22.240 example
00:29:22.660 because he
00:29:24.300 defended
00:29:24.780 Trump
00:29:25.180 he said
00:29:26.040 it was
00:29:26.220 just
00:29:26.400 political
00:29:26.780 charges
00:29:27.260 well
00:29:29.480 this is
00:29:29.940 super
00:29:30.240 interesting
00:29:30.620 to nerds
00:29:31.200 like me
00:29:31.600 who use
00:29:31.960 Twitter
00:29:32.220 so
00:29:33.300 Musk
00:29:33.700 has
00:29:34.040 released
00:29:34.540 the
00:29:35.620 algorithms
00:29:36.320 the
00:29:36.720 actual
00:29:37.220 code
00:29:37.840 the
00:29:39.060 programming
00:29:39.580 code
00:29:40.000 for
00:29:40.920 when
00:29:41.280 your
00:29:41.640 tweets
00:29:42.140 get a
00:29:42.560 lot
00:29:42.680 of
00:29:42.780 attention
00:29:43.120 and
00:29:43.480 when
00:29:43.660 they're
00:29:43.880 suppressed
00:29:44.320 now
00:29:45.500 this
00:29:46.200 doesn't
00:29:46.540 get to
00:29:46.840 shadow
00:29:47.160 banning
00:29:47.600 but it
00:29:48.380 tells you
00:29:48.700 what kind
00:29:49.200 of
00:29:49.460 tweets
00:29:50.300 Twitter
00:29:51.540 likes
00:29:52.000 and what
00:29:52.480 they don't
00:29:52.800 and there
00:29:53.080 were some
00:29:53.420 surprises
00:29:53.980 there were
00:29:55.500 some surprises
00:29:56.240 would you
00:29:56.820 like to
00:29:57.220 know
00:29:57.480 what makes
00:29:58.460 a tweet
00:29:58.960 get more
00:30:00.240 attention
00:30:00.600 of course
00:30:01.300 you would
00:30:01.620 so
00:30:02.600 courtesy
00:30:03.140 of
00:30:03.960 Twitter
00:30:04.960 user
00:30:05.440 NFT
00:30:06.200 God
00:30:06.940 so it's
00:30:08.340 NFT
00:30:08.900 underscore
00:30:09.700 God
00:30:10.260 who I'm
00:30:11.620 guessing is a
00:30:12.200 programmer
00:30:12.620 went through
00:30:13.620 the code
00:30:14.120 and showed
00:30:14.520 his screenshots
00:30:15.080 and this
00:30:16.240 is what
00:30:16.560 he reports
00:30:17.240 now I
00:30:18.020 suppose
00:30:18.360 it's a
00:30:19.260 little early
00:30:19.740 so maybe
00:30:20.240 other people
00:30:20.900 might have
00:30:21.300 a different
00:30:21.620 view of
00:30:22.160 some of
00:30:22.500 these things
00:30:23.020 but it
00:30:24.040 looked
00:30:24.300 reliable
00:30:25.100 in general
00:30:26.320 so here's
00:30:26.800 what he
00:30:27.000 found
00:30:27.260 if you
00:30:28.800 it counts
00:30:30.820 likes
00:30:31.660 on Twitter
00:30:32.580 more than
00:30:33.800 retweets
00:30:34.440 okay
00:30:35.580 totally
00:30:36.060 surprised
00:30:36.640 but when you
00:30:37.460 think about it
00:30:38.080 that makes
00:30:38.500 sense
00:30:38.900 the more
00:30:40.080 people hit
00:30:40.620 the like
00:30:41.100 button
00:30:41.500 the more
00:30:42.660 likely people
00:30:43.280 like it
00:30:43.780 so Twitter
00:30:45.560 wants you to
00:30:46.080 see stuff
00:30:46.480 you like
00:30:46.900 so if
00:30:47.980 people like
00:30:48.760 it
00:30:49.080 there you
00:30:49.900 go
00:30:50.080 now my
00:30:51.200 behavior
00:30:51.700 for a lot
00:30:52.560 of tweets
00:30:53.000 had been
00:30:53.880 I would
00:30:54.280 retweet it
00:30:55.040 thinking
00:30:56.280 well that's
00:30:57.020 what's best
00:30:57.560 for the
00:30:57.980 person who
00:30:58.540 posted it
00:30:59.120 I wouldn't
00:31:00.380 necessarily
00:31:00.940 hit like
00:31:01.700 because often
00:31:03.080 I would be
00:31:03.520 thinking well
00:31:04.120 it's not that
00:31:05.100 I'm agreeing
00:31:05.760 exactly with
00:31:06.640 the tweet
00:31:07.140 but I think
00:31:08.240 you should
00:31:08.580 see it
00:31:09.020 so I'd
00:31:10.580 retweet
00:31:11.120 as what
00:31:12.220 I thought
00:31:12.540 was a
00:31:12.960 respectful
00:31:13.500 way
00:31:13.900 to treat
00:31:14.900 the tweeter
00:31:15.420 if I didn't
00:31:16.800 exactly agree
00:31:17.580 with it
00:31:17.880 but I thought
00:31:18.260 it was useful
00:31:18.900 part of the
00:31:19.860 conversation
00:31:20.320 now I would
00:31:21.680 probably hit
00:31:22.160 also like
00:31:22.980 because hitting
00:31:24.500 like would
00:31:25.180 boost its
00:31:25.700 message
00:31:26.120 and if the
00:31:27.220 whole point
00:31:27.760 of tweeting
00:31:28.500 is I wanted
00:31:29.300 to boost
00:31:29.720 its message
00:31:30.340 I think that
00:31:32.440 would be the
00:31:32.800 decent thing
00:31:33.280 to do
00:31:33.620 so I'm
00:31:34.400 already going
00:31:34.800 to change
00:31:35.120 my behavior
00:31:35.740 I'm going
00:31:37.320 to hit like
00:31:37.760 more often
00:31:38.540 because now
00:31:39.900 I know
00:31:40.220 it helps
00:31:40.760 the person
00:31:41.200 who tweeted
00:31:41.560 it
00:31:41.940 here's another
00:31:43.880 one
00:31:44.080 and it's a
00:31:44.480 big difference
00:31:45.100 it's like
00:31:46.320 a 30 times
00:31:48.220 impact
00:31:48.720 if you have
00:31:49.800 a lot of
00:31:50.300 likes
00:31:50.720 you get
00:31:51.880 30 times
00:31:52.880 more exposure
00:31:53.720 30 times
00:31:55.460 if you have
00:31:56.920 a lot of
00:31:57.220 likes
00:31:57.540 and if you
00:31:58.920 have a lot
00:31:59.240 of retweets
00:31:59.840 you get
00:32:01.200 20 times
00:32:02.040 the exposure
00:32:02.940 so if
00:32:04.220 people like
00:32:04.880 it
00:32:05.180 then it
00:32:06.780 will go
00:32:07.040 to more
00:32:07.340 people who
00:32:07.780 like it
00:32:08.280 and then it
00:32:08.840 will go
00:32:09.060 to more
00:32:09.320 people who
00:32:09.720 like it
00:32:10.080 so the
00:32:10.380 more people
00:32:10.740 like it
00:32:11.280 the more
00:32:12.140 people will
00:32:12.520 see it
00:32:12.800 like it
00:32:13.320 so very
00:32:15.460 interesting
00:32:15.840 here's one
00:32:17.140 I did not
00:32:17.640 see coming
00:32:18.160 if you use
00:32:18.800 multiple
00:32:19.260 hashtags
00:32:19.760 you're not
00:32:21.860 getting ranked
00:32:22.380 at all
00:32:22.860 didn't you
00:32:26.160 think hashtags
00:32:26.900 were helping
00:32:27.400 you
00:32:27.680 it turns out
00:32:29.500 if you have
00:32:29.820 more than
00:32:30.260 one hashtag
00:32:31.120 they completely
00:32:32.560 remove you
00:32:33.240 from the
00:32:33.760 boost
00:32:34.160 you don't
00:32:34.880 get any
00:32:35.260 boost
00:32:35.620 and when
00:32:37.680 I thought
00:32:38.040 about it
00:32:38.420 I agreed
00:32:38.940 with it
00:32:39.460 because if
00:32:40.640 you have
00:32:40.860 more than
00:32:41.200 one hashtag
00:32:41.780 you're usually
00:32:43.380 a bot
00:32:43.900 you're usually
00:32:46.440 a tweet
00:32:46.820 I don't want
00:32:47.240 to see
00:32:47.560 I almost
00:32:49.200 never want
00:32:49.700 to see
00:32:49.980 a tweet
00:32:50.980 that has
00:32:51.260 more than
00:32:51.560 one hashtag
00:32:52.080 I never
00:32:54.240 really thought
00:32:54.680 about it
00:32:55.140 but I
00:32:55.980 definitely
00:32:56.300 don't like
00:32:56.800 seeing a lot
00:32:57.240 of hashtags
00:32:57.720 so Twitter
00:32:58.820 helps me
00:32:59.300 out
00:32:59.560 that one
00:33:01.800 was not
00:33:02.220 obvious
00:33:02.620 how about
00:33:03.780 if you
00:33:06.040 mention
00:33:06.360 something
00:33:06.780 that's
00:33:07.120 trending
00:33:07.520 you get
00:33:08.600 a little
00:33:08.820 boost
00:33:09.240 so if
00:33:11.080 you can
00:33:11.480 make your
00:33:12.300 thing
00:33:12.520 tie to
00:33:12.980 the
00:33:13.140 trending
00:33:13.460 headline
00:33:13.980 extra
00:33:14.660 boost
00:33:15.060 here's
00:33:17.680 one I
00:33:18.000 did know
00:33:18.440 about
00:33:18.820 if you
00:33:19.680 have an
00:33:19.940 image
00:33:20.220 or a
00:33:20.540 video
00:33:20.780 attached
00:33:21.300 you get
00:33:21.960 a two
00:33:23.140 times
00:33:23.540 boost
00:33:24.000 so here's
00:33:26.080 what I
00:33:26.320 did
00:33:26.520 with my
00:33:27.120 I always
00:33:27.560 do a
00:33:27.820 tweet
00:33:28.060 before my
00:33:28.600 live stream
00:33:29.140 so today
00:33:30.540 what I
00:33:30.840 did was
00:33:31.320 instead of
00:33:31.880 putting
00:33:32.140 text
00:33:32.700 which usually
00:33:33.660 my tweet
00:33:34.100 is just
00:33:34.420 text
00:33:34.800 and then
00:33:36.120 a link
00:33:37.300 to where
00:33:38.060 to get
00:33:38.380 it
00:33:38.680 apparently
00:33:39.520 the other
00:33:40.120 thing that
00:33:40.540 they downgrade
00:33:41.320 is external
00:33:43.400 links
00:33:44.080 I'm not
00:33:49.640 cool with
00:33:50.160 that
00:33:50.460 to me
00:33:52.360 that's not
00:33:52.800 cool
00:33:53.160 here's why
00:33:54.520 I use
00:33:57.060 Twitter
00:33:57.400 for my
00:33:58.260 own
00:33:58.420 entertainment
00:33:58.860 of course
00:33:59.360 but what
00:34:00.100 Twitter gets
00:34:00.620 out of it
00:34:01.020 is my
00:34:01.400 eyeballs
00:34:01.860 to look
00:34:02.340 at their
00:34:02.600 advertisements
00:34:03.160 and I
00:34:04.500 accept that
00:34:05.100 agreement
00:34:05.460 because I
00:34:06.720 like the
00:34:07.080 product
00:34:07.520 and
00:34:09.080 advertisements
00:34:10.760 are just
00:34:11.340 part of the
00:34:11.920 cost
00:34:12.260 so I
00:34:13.380 pay that
00:34:13.820 cost by
00:34:14.520 my attention
00:34:15.440 but a
00:34:17.940 big
00:34:18.220 big
00:34:18.620 big
00:34:19.040 reason
00:34:19.440 that people
00:34:20.060 like me
00:34:20.460 would use
00:34:20.880 Twitter
00:34:21.180 is to
00:34:22.160 give
00:34:22.360 attention
00:34:22.760 to outside
00:34:23.460 links
00:34:23.880 that's
00:34:25.160 my
00:34:25.360 number
00:34:25.760 one
00:34:26.140 reason
00:34:26.560 my
00:34:27.740 number
00:34:28.060 one
00:34:28.380 reason
00:34:28.720 and I
00:34:29.600 get
00:34:29.740 de-boosted
00:34:30.340 for that
00:34:30.740 so
00:34:33.700 here's
00:34:34.360 what I
00:34:34.640 tested
00:34:34.980 I don't
00:34:36.060 think
00:34:36.240 that
00:34:36.480 I don't
00:34:36.960 think
00:34:37.140 that's
00:34:37.500 an
00:34:38.060 ethical
00:34:38.500 I don't
00:34:40.040 think
00:34:40.200 that's
00:34:40.420 ethical
00:34:40.760 let me
00:34:41.400 just say
00:34:41.640 it that
00:34:41.840 way
00:34:42.020 I think
00:34:42.740 this
00:34:42.980 rule
00:34:43.320 within
00:34:43.660 Twitter
00:34:43.980 without
00:34:44.820 being
00:34:45.220 disclosed
00:34:46.140 without
00:34:47.020 being
00:34:47.400 disclosed
00:34:48.220 is
00:34:48.880 unethical
00:34:49.420 now
00:34:50.280 that it's
00:34:50.720 disclosed
00:34:51.460 I'm
00:34:53.120 gonna
00:34:53.280 yeah
00:34:53.720 I'm
00:34:53.840 gonna
00:34:53.980 think
00:34:54.440 about
00:34:54.680 it
00:34:54.780 a little
00:34:54.960 bit
00:34:55.120 more
00:34:55.360 but
00:34:56.080 not
00:34:56.460 disclosing
00:34:57.080 that
00:34:57.320 I
00:34:57.500 consider
00:34:57.860 it
00:34:58.000 unethical
00:34:58.500 wouldn't
00:34:59.940 you
00:35:00.140 am I
00:35:00.980 wrong
00:35:01.160 about
00:35:01.360 that
00:35:01.660 that
00:35:03.040 de-boosting
00:35:03.700 an
00:35:03.880 external
00:35:04.380 link
00:35:04.840 for
00:35:06.180 someone
00:35:06.500 who
00:35:06.640 has
00:35:06.800 a
00:35:06.940 million
00:35:07.180 followers
00:35:07.720 and
00:35:08.060 I
00:35:08.640 presumably
00:35:10.140 I
00:35:10.720 donate
00:35:11.200 a lot
00:35:11.540 to
00:35:11.720 Twitter
00:35:12.020 by my
00:35:13.160 activity
00:35:13.660 because
00:35:14.100 there's
00:35:14.300 lots
00:35:14.560 of
00:35:14.700 followers
00:35:15.120 that
00:35:15.560 can
00:35:15.720 see
00:35:15.900 advertisements
00:35:16.400 to
00:35:17.900 me
00:35:18.020 that
00:35:18.200 seems
00:35:18.440 unethical
00:35:18.980 now
00:35:20.760 that
00:35:20.960 they've
00:35:21.360 now
00:35:22.100 that
00:35:22.340 it's
00:35:22.700 transparent
00:35:23.520 I'm
00:35:24.700 gonna
00:35:24.820 give
00:35:25.080 it
00:35:25.280 a
00:35:25.560 temporary
00:35:25.980 pass
00:35:26.540 because
00:35:27.740 that's
00:35:28.000 moving
00:35:28.280 in the
00:35:28.520 right
00:35:28.660 direction
00:35:29.040 I'd
00:35:30.280 like to
00:35:30.580 see
00:35:30.700 that
00:35:30.880 go
00:35:31.100 away
00:35:31.420 what
00:35:32.620 would
00:35:33.020 you
00:35:33.140 say
00:35:33.380 I'd
00:35:34.160 like
00:35:34.300 to
00:35:34.420 see
00:35:34.540 that
00:35:34.700 go
00:35:34.880 away
00:35:35.080 and
00:35:35.440 the
00:35:35.540 reason
00:35:35.680 I'd
00:35:35.860 like
00:35:35.980 to
00:35:36.100 see
00:35:36.240 it
00:35:36.360 go
00:35:36.520 away
00:35:36.780 is
00:35:37.020 that
00:35:37.180 it's
00:35:37.320 good
00:35:37.540 for
00:35:37.760 me
00:35:38.060 but
00:35:39.900 I
00:35:40.040 also
00:35:40.360 think
00:35:40.660 it
00:35:40.780 would
00:35:40.900 be
00:35:41.040 good
00:35:41.240 for
00:35:41.460 other
00:35:41.800 people
00:35:42.960 now
00:35:43.800 but
00:35:44.400 let's
00:35:44.600 think
00:35:44.820 it
00:35:44.960 through
00:35:45.180 you
00:35:45.780 know
00:35:45.860 before
00:35:46.100 we
00:35:46.260 get
00:35:46.380 hasty
00:35:46.780 if
00:35:47.760 they
00:35:47.940 didn't
00:35:48.700 down
00:35:49.140 if
00:35:49.600 they
00:35:49.760 didn't
00:35:50.080 de-boost
00:35:50.720 things
00:35:51.100 with
00:35:51.340 links
00:35:51.740 maybe
00:35:53.320 that's
00:35:53.580 all
00:35:53.700 you'd
00:35:53.920 see
00:35:54.160 everybody
00:35:55.600 would
00:35:55.920 just
00:35:56.100 use
00:35:56.260 it
00:35:56.380 for
00:35:56.500 free
00:35:56.760 advertising
00:35:57.300 when
00:35:58.180 in
00:35:58.340 fact
00:35:58.560 it's
00:35:58.920 a
00:35:59.080 platform
00:35:59.460 for
00:35:59.860 their
00:36:00.040 own
00:36:00.220 advertising
00:36:00.740 that's
00:36:01.140 what
00:36:01.300 they
00:36:01.540 built
00:36:01.820 they
00:36:02.520 didn't
00:36:02.700 make
00:36:02.900 a
00:36:03.080 platform
00:36:03.440 for
00:36:03.760 you
00:36:04.000 to
00:36:04.140 advertise
00:36:08.060 my
00:36:08.780 link
00:36:09.200 unless
00:36:11.980 I
00:36:12.200 had
00:36:12.340 a
00:36:12.500 million
00:36:12.780 followers
00:36:13.760 it's
00:36:15.840 the
00:36:16.300 fact
00:36:16.560 that
00:36:16.720 I
00:36:16.840 built
00:36:17.100 up
00:36:17.400 enough
00:36:18.340 goodwill
00:36:19.000 in my
00:36:19.400 Twitter
00:36:19.700 feed
00:36:20.140 that
00:36:20.660 people
00:36:20.900 want
00:36:21.240 to
00:36:21.400 go
00:36:21.560 there
00:36:21.860 that's
00:36:22.420 the
00:36:22.540 only
00:36:22.740 reason
00:36:23.080 that
00:36:23.260 it's
00:36:23.400 good
00:36:23.600 for
00:36:23.760 me
00:36:23.880 to
00:36:24.000 put
00:36:24.140 a
00:36:24.240 link
00:36:24.400 in
00:36:24.540 there
00:36:24.720 to
00:36:25.000 an
00:36:25.140 external
00:36:25.460 source
00:36:25.920 otherwise
00:36:26.960 I
00:36:27.220 wouldn't
00:36:27.380 bother
00:36:27.660 so
00:36:29.380 I
00:36:31.140 think
00:36:31.320 this
00:36:31.520 one
00:36:31.660 needs
00:36:31.840 to
00:36:31.960 be
00:36:32.100 rethought
00:36:32.660 a
00:36:33.880 little
00:36:33.980 bit
00:36:34.120 of
00:36:34.220 rethinking
00:36:34.620 on
00:36:34.860 this
00:36:35.020 topic
00:36:35.340 would
00:36:35.540 be
00:36:35.660 good
00:36:35.920 maybe
00:36:36.640 this
00:36:37.520 is
00:36:37.720 the
00:36:37.860 best
00:36:38.140 solution
00:36:38.820 even
00:36:39.140 for
00:36:39.400 me
00:36:39.640 it's
00:36:40.440 possible
00:36:40.820 that
00:36:41.100 I
00:36:41.260 don't
00:36:41.420 want
00:36:41.560 to
00:36:41.660 see
00:36:41.780 that
00:36:41.960 many
00:36:42.180 links
00:36:42.540 on
00:36:42.740 Twitter
00:36:42.960 too
00:36:43.360 so
00:36:44.500 maybe
00:36:45.820 it
00:36:45.960 makes
00:36:46.100 sense
00:36:46.480 but
00:36:47.700 I
00:36:48.460 got
00:36:48.620 questions
00:36:49.120 this
00:36:50.100 one's
00:36:50.360 a
00:36:50.460 little
00:36:50.580 sketchy
00:36:51.040 to
00:36:51.140 me
00:36:51.360 here's
00:36:52.960 some
00:36:53.080 other
00:36:53.240 things
00:36:53.540 that
00:36:53.700 will
00:36:53.880 boost
00:36:54.360 or
00:36:54.560 don't
00:36:54.760 boost
00:36:55.080 your
00:36:55.360 Twitter
00:36:55.800 stuff
00:36:56.200 if
00:36:57.320 you're
00:36:57.520 verified
00:36:57.940 you
00:36:58.240 get
00:36:58.360 a
00:36:58.460 little
00:36:58.560 boost
00:36:58.980 if
00:37:02.200 you
00:37:02.580 oh
00:37:02.860 let me
00:37:03.320 finish
00:37:03.560 my
00:37:03.740 point
00:37:03.940 so
00:37:04.160 in
00:37:04.260 the
00:37:04.380 tweets
00:37:04.680 that
00:37:05.100 send
00:37:06.300 people
00:37:06.620 to
00:37:06.820 this
00:37:07.060 feed
00:37:07.360 today
00:37:07.700 instead
00:37:09.520 of
00:37:09.840 making
00:37:10.280 them
00:37:10.540 all
00:37:10.800 text
00:37:11.240 I
00:37:12.120 just
00:37:12.340 did
00:37:12.500 a
00:37:12.640 screenshot
00:37:13.120 of
00:37:13.660 part
00:37:13.880 of
00:37:13.960 my
00:37:14.100 text
00:37:14.500 and
00:37:15.200 attached
00:37:15.600 it
00:37:15.840 as
00:37:16.080 an
00:37:16.220 image
00:37:16.540 so
00:37:17.920 instead
00:37:18.200 of
00:37:18.400 just
00:37:18.640 text
00:37:19.080 some
00:37:20.020 of
00:37:20.180 it
00:37:20.380 will
00:37:20.780 appear
00:37:21.100 to
00:37:21.520 Twitter
00:37:22.320 to be
00:37:22.640 an
00:37:22.760 image
00:37:23.060 will
00:37:24.540 that
00:37:24.700 make
00:37:24.880 a
00:37:25.000 difference
00:37:25.300 in
00:37:25.560 theory
00:37:25.900 it
00:37:26.080 should
00:37:26.220 boost
00:37:26.500 it
00:37:26.620 by
00:37:26.760 two
00:37:27.020 even
00:37:27.720 though
00:37:27.920 the
00:37:28.080 tweet
00:37:28.320 says
00:37:28.580 exactly
00:37:29.000 the
00:37:29.180 same
00:37:29.360 thing
00:37:29.620 now
00:37:30.500 if
00:37:30.740 I
00:37:30.860 had
00:37:31.020 a
00:37:31.140 link
00:37:31.380 in
00:37:31.540 it
00:37:31.640 to
00:37:31.740 an
00:37:31.880 external
00:37:32.220 source
00:37:32.800 it
00:37:33.500 would
00:37:33.660 de-boost
00:37:34.140 it
00:37:34.340 and
00:37:34.620 of
00:37:34.760 course
00:37:34.920 the
00:37:35.080 whole
00:37:35.220 point
00:37:35.520 of
00:37:35.640 it
00:37:35.740 was
00:37:35.900 to
00:37:36.040 put
00:37:36.160 a
00:37:36.280 link
00:37:36.440 in
00:37:36.580 it
00:37:36.780 but
00:37:37.580 here's
00:37:38.040 what
00:37:38.200 I
00:37:38.340 tried
00:37:38.680 I
00:37:39.500 tried
00:37:39.760 putting
00:37:40.080 the
00:37:40.420 link
00:37:40.920 in
00:37:41.300 the
00:37:41.440 first
00:37:41.720 comment
00:37:42.240 so
00:37:43.800 it's
00:37:43.940 a
00:37:44.060 separate
00:37:44.320 tweet
00:37:44.740 does
00:37:47.420 that
00:37:47.620 help
00:37:47.940 because
00:37:48.840 it's
00:37:48.960 not
00:37:49.180 in
00:37:49.320 the
00:37:49.420 main
00:37:49.620 tweet
00:37:49.880 it's
00:37:50.100 in
00:37:50.200 my
00:37:50.340 own
00:37:50.540 comment
00:37:50.900 to
00:37:51.060 my
00:37:51.180 own
00:37:51.360 tweet
00:37:51.680 I
00:37:52.720 don't
00:37:52.840 know
00:37:53.120 we'll
00:37:54.220 see
00:37:54.500 other
00:37:57.260 things
00:37:57.640 that
00:37:57.880 boost
00:37:58.220 you
00:37:58.420 or
00:37:58.560 don't
00:37:58.940 your
00:37:59.260 content
00:37:59.720 would
00:37:59.980 be
00:38:00.360 if
00:38:01.900 it's
00:38:02.100 media
00:38:02.540 or
00:38:02.880 news
00:38:03.240 you
00:38:03.520 get
00:38:03.640 a
00:38:03.740 boost
00:38:04.000 if
00:38:04.240 it's
00:38:04.400 a
00:38:04.520 trend
00:38:04.780 you
00:38:04.940 get
00:38:05.040 a
00:38:05.140 boost
00:38:05.400 so
00:38:05.880 basically
00:38:06.320 if
00:38:06.540 it
00:38:06.660 ties
00:38:06.940 into
00:38:07.180 whatever
00:38:07.420 is
00:38:07.580 happening
00:38:07.920 in
00:38:08.180 the
00:38:08.480 real
00:38:08.660 world
00:38:08.940 you
00:38:09.080 get
00:38:09.200 a
00:38:09.280 boost
00:38:09.580 and
00:38:10.380 you
00:38:10.480 get
00:38:10.680 demoted
00:38:11.140 if
00:38:11.360 there's
00:38:11.560 no
00:38:11.760 text
00:38:12.260 so
00:38:13.560 you
00:38:13.700 see
00:38:13.860 a
00:38:13.980 lot
00:38:14.100 of
00:38:14.200 tweets
00:38:14.440 where
00:38:14.660 somebody
00:38:15.000 will
00:38:15.200 just
00:38:15.400 do
00:38:15.640 an
00:38:15.960 emoticon
00:38:16.720 and
00:38:17.920 then
00:38:18.060 refer
00:38:18.400 to
00:38:18.580 something
00:38:24.500 picture
00:38:24.900 plus
00:38:25.260 text
00:38:25.680 a
00:38:26.380 URL
00:38:26.860 only
00:38:28.300 will
00:38:28.720 be
00:38:28.880 deboosted
00:38:29.520 I've
00:38:30.240 done
00:38:30.380 that
00:38:30.580 a
00:38:30.700 million
00:38:30.900 times
00:38:31.380 I
00:38:32.060 can't
00:38:32.260 tell
00:38:32.380 you
00:38:32.500 how many
00:38:32.740 times
00:38:33.040 I've
00:38:33.240 tweeted
00:38:33.480 just
00:38:33.800 a
00:38:33.960 URL
00:38:34.400 because
00:38:35.340 it
00:38:35.540 attaches
00:38:36.000 the
00:38:37.380 image
00:38:37.840 automatically
00:38:38.360 I
00:38:39.220 thought
00:38:39.400 that
00:38:39.560 was
00:38:39.680 good
00:38:39.840 enough
00:38:40.160 but
00:38:40.700 apparently
00:38:40.980 not
00:38:41.260 URL
00:38:41.760 by
00:38:42.060 itself
00:38:42.360 is
00:38:42.580 deboosted
00:38:43.160 and
00:38:44.280 name
00:38:44.620 only
00:38:44.920 I
00:38:45.140 don't
00:38:45.240 know
00:38:45.340 what
00:38:45.460 that
00:38:45.600 means
00:38:45.860 name
00:38:46.220 only
00:38:46.500 if
00:38:48.480 it's
00:38:48.720 a
00:38:48.920 non
00:38:49.300 news
00:38:49.660 item
00:38:49.960 it
00:38:50.140 gets
00:38:50.320 deboosted
00:38:51.000 and
00:38:52.080 if
00:38:52.200 it's
00:38:52.360 a
00:38:52.500 non
00:38:52.860 media
00:38:53.220 thing
00:38:53.580 it
00:38:53.740 gets
00:38:53.920 deboosted
00:38:54.580 and
00:38:56.420 they
00:38:57.640 also
00:38:57.900 calculate
00:38:58.440 your
00:38:58.740 account's
00:38:59.380 reputation
00:39:00.000 alright
00:39:00.440 here's
00:39:00.740 one
00:39:00.880 I
00:39:01.000 don't
00:39:01.160 like
00:39:01.400 at
00:39:01.540 all
00:39:01.800 your
00:39:03.080 account's
00:39:03.700 reputation
00:39:04.580 so
00:39:05.580 you
00:39:05.660 get
00:39:05.800 more
00:39:06.060 boost
00:39:06.440 if
00:39:07.200 you're
00:39:07.600 an
00:39:08.380 upstanding
00:39:08.940 Twitter
00:39:09.620 user
00:39:09.980 here's
00:39:11.080 one
00:39:11.260 of
00:39:11.360 the
00:39:11.460 ways
00:39:11.700 they
00:39:11.940 decide
00:39:12.420 if
00:39:12.780 you're
00:39:13.040 an
00:39:13.260 upstanding
00:39:13.780 citizen
00:39:14.280 and
00:39:15.740 let
00:39:15.900 me
00:39:16.000 tell
00:39:16.160 you
00:39:16.280 in
00:39:16.400 advance
00:39:16.780 I
00:39:18.200 hate
00:39:18.520 this
00:39:18.880 you
00:39:20.280 get
00:39:20.500 deboosted
00:39:21.200 if
00:39:21.420 you
00:39:21.580 interact
00:39:22.160 with
00:39:22.540 low
00:39:23.120 quality
00:39:23.600 accounts
00:39:24.260 trolls
00:39:25.380 if
00:39:26.800 you
00:39:26.940 answer
00:39:27.340 a
00:39:27.540 troll
00:39:27.840 you
00:39:29.140 get
00:39:29.400 deboosted
00:39:30.100 I
00:39:31.800 answer
00:39:32.140 trolls
00:39:32.500 every
00:39:32.800 day
00:39:33.020 as part
00:39:33.400 of my
00:39:33.620 entertainment
00:39:34.080 it's
00:39:35.040 part
00:39:35.220 of the
00:39:35.440 show
00:39:35.700 like
00:39:36.900 I
00:39:37.020 do
00:39:37.200 it
00:39:37.380 partly
00:39:37.800 for
00:39:38.060 my
00:39:38.300 followers
00:39:38.760 partly
00:39:39.500 because
00:39:39.740 I
00:39:39.880 like
00:39:40.120 it
00:39:40.340 it's
00:39:40.600 just
00:39:40.740 fun
00:39:41.020 but
00:39:41.880 partly
00:39:42.180 because
00:39:42.500 it's
00:39:42.740 just
00:39:42.900 part
00:39:43.100 of
00:39:43.200 my
00:39:43.340 entertainment
00:39:43.780 to
00:39:44.320 show
00:39:44.620 that
00:39:45.400 I
00:39:45.620 dunked
00:39:46.800 on
00:39:46.920 a
00:39:47.060 troll
00:39:47.300 if
00:39:47.560 it's
00:39:47.700 funny
00:39:48.000 like
00:39:48.880 I
00:39:49.040 only
00:39:49.340 do
00:39:49.480 it
00:39:49.580 if
00:39:49.620 it's
00:39:49.780 funny
00:39:50.160 I
00:39:52.160 but
00:39:53.660 apparently
00:39:54.020 I've
00:39:54.360 been
00:39:54.580 I've
00:39:55.180 been
00:39:55.340 hurting
00:39:55.660 my
00:39:55.960 own
00:39:56.120 business
00:39:56.480 model
00:39:56.880 by
00:39:58.380 interacting
00:39:58.940 with
00:39:59.260 low
00:39:59.560 quality
00:39:59.920 accounts
00:40:00.460 do you
00:40:01.800 think
00:40:01.980 that
00:40:02.140 that
00:40:02.400 should
00:40:02.980 be
00:40:03.120 a
00:40:03.260 rule
00:40:03.460 I
00:40:04.640 would
00:40:04.800 think
00:40:05.000 that
00:40:05.180 if
00:40:05.340 a
00:40:05.640 big
00:40:06.340 account
00:40:06.720 interacts
00:40:07.200 with
00:40:07.460 a
00:40:07.740 small
00:40:08.680 account
00:40:09.140 for
00:40:10.460 any
00:40:10.740 reason
00:40:11.120 that
00:40:12.780 should
00:40:12.980 be
00:40:13.440 hell
00:40:14.360 yes
00:40:14.720 to
00:40:16.580 me
00:40:16.740 that
00:40:16.940 should
00:40:17.120 be
00:40:17.500 an
00:40:18.540 advantage
00:40:18.940 I
00:40:20.020 don't
00:40:20.260 see
00:40:20.440 that
00:40:20.780 as
00:40:21.860 making
00:40:22.280 my
00:40:22.480 reputation
00:40:23.000 go
00:40:23.240 down
00:40:23.520 so
00:40:24.780 I
00:40:25.060 don't
00:40:25.280 know
00:40:25.400 what
00:40:25.540 this
00:40:25.700 means
00:40:26.080 this
00:40:26.800 one
00:40:26.980 I
00:40:27.120 think
00:40:27.320 requires
00:40:28.100 another
00:40:28.620 look
00:40:29.080 again
00:40:30.400 I'm
00:40:30.820 going to
00:40:31.000 stop
00:40:31.760 short
00:40:32.100 of
00:40:32.240 saying
00:40:32.520 it
00:40:32.700 needs
00:40:32.880 to
00:40:33.060 change
00:40:33.480 because
00:40:34.220 you know
00:40:34.440 people
00:40:34.740 put a
00:40:35.700 lot of
00:40:35.960 thought
00:40:36.180 into
00:40:36.400 this
00:40:36.660 I'm
00:40:36.940 just
00:40:37.080 sort
00:40:37.320 of
00:40:37.420 entering
00:40:37.720 the
00:40:37.960 game
00:40:38.200 so
00:40:38.920 I'm
00:40:39.180 open
00:40:39.420 to
00:40:39.660 a
00:40:39.840 better
00:40:40.040 argument
00:40:40.480 there
00:40:40.940 might
00:40:41.080 be
00:40:41.180 an
00:40:41.280 argument
00:40:41.580 that
00:40:41.880 it's
00:40:41.980 good
00:40:42.200 just
00:40:42.380 the
00:40:42.480 way
00:40:42.560 it
00:40:42.660 is
00:40:42.800 but
00:40:43.300 I
00:40:43.420 just
00:40:44.160 don't
00:40:44.440 feel
00:40:44.840 that
00:40:46.320 that
00:40:46.540 makes
00:40:46.780 the
00:40:46.960 world
00:40:47.200 a
00:40:47.360 better
00:40:47.540 place
00:40:47.980 I
00:40:49.080 should
00:40:49.260 be
00:40:49.420 able
00:40:49.560 to
00:40:49.740 interact
00:40:50.200 with
00:40:50.540 everybody
00:40:51.380 small
00:40:52.420 accounts
00:40:53.000 controversial
00:40:54.460 accounts
00:40:55.160 just
00:40:56.240 anybody
00:40:56.660 anytime
00:40:57.980 Twitter
00:40:58.460 puts
00:40:58.820 a
00:40:59.200 limit
00:41:00.740 on
00:41:01.080 who
00:41:01.460 I
00:41:01.660 here's
00:41:02.220 the best
00:41:02.760 way
00:41:02.920 to say
00:41:03.200 it
00:41:03.760 have
00:41:04.880 I
00:41:05.000 ever
00:41:05.200 given
00:41:05.480 you
00:41:05.640 my
00:41:05.880 rant
00:41:06.220 about
00:41:06.660 anybody
00:41:07.260 trying
00:41:08.020 to
00:41:08.560 limit
00:41:09.920 who I
00:41:10.320 talk to
00:41:10.780 or associate
00:41:11.380 with
00:41:11.760 have
00:41:12.760 I
00:41:12.880 done
00:41:13.040 that
00:41:13.240 rant
00:41:13.460 lately
00:41:13.800 because
00:41:14.500 you
00:41:14.600 know
00:41:14.720 I
00:41:14.860 do
00:41:15.000 it
00:41:15.120 at
00:41:15.220 least
00:41:15.400 twice
00:41:15.700 a
00:41:15.860 year
00:41:16.060 and
00:41:16.560 I'm
00:41:16.760 going
00:41:16.860 to
00:41:16.940 do
00:41:17.060 it
00:41:17.160 right
00:41:17.320 now
00:41:17.580 nobody
00:41:18.520 can
00:41:18.900 tell
00:41:19.080 me
00:41:19.240 who
00:41:19.360 to
00:41:19.460 fucking
00:41:19.900 talk
00:41:20.260 to
00:41:20.500 nobody
00:41:21.160 can
00:41:21.440 tell
00:41:21.600 me
00:41:21.740 who
00:41:21.860 to
00:41:21.980 fucking
00:41:22.380 associate
00:41:22.940 with
00:41:23.380 I
00:41:23.900 will
00:41:24.060 tweet
00:41:24.380 whoever
00:41:24.720 the
00:41:24.960 fuck
00:41:25.260 I
00:41:25.420 want
00:41:25.780 for
00:41:26.540 any
00:41:27.020 reason
00:41:27.380 whatsoever
00:41:27.840 you
00:41:28.540 cannot
00:41:28.900 tell me
00:41:29.320 who
00:41:29.440 to
00:41:29.580 associate
00:41:29.960 with
00:41:30.340 this
00:41:30.880 is
00:41:31.060 fucking
00:41:31.340 America
00:41:31.800 I
00:41:32.500 will
00:41:32.640 associate
00:41:33.100 with
00:41:33.480 the
00:41:33.660 worst
00:41:33.960 people
00:41:34.280 in the
00:41:34.500 world
00:41:34.720 for
00:41:35.580 any
00:41:36.060 reason
00:41:36.400 I
00:41:36.600 want
00:41:36.960 could
00:41:37.720 be
00:41:37.860 for
00:41:38.040 entertainment
00:41:38.520 could
00:41:39.420 be
00:41:39.560 because
00:41:39.820 I
00:41:39.960 want
00:41:40.080 to
00:41:40.180 change
00:41:40.420 their
00:41:40.600 minds
00:41:40.880 could
00:41:41.340 be
00:41:41.480 because
00:41:41.780 it's
00:41:41.980 interesting
00:41:42.360 could
00:41:42.620 be
00:41:42.780 because
00:41:43.080 it's
00:41:43.280 news
00:41:43.500 don't
00:41:44.140 fucking
00:41:44.500 tell
00:41:44.780 me
00:41:44.940 who
00:41:45.080 I
00:41:45.200 can
00:41:45.340 talk
00:41:45.620 to
00:41:45.840 don't
00:41:46.500 fucking
00:41:46.860 tell
00:41:47.100 me
00:41:47.240 who
00:41:47.380 I
00:41:47.500 can
00:41:47.660 associate
00:41:48.060 with
00:41:48.380 don't
00:41:48.940 fucking
00:41:49.340 tell
00:41:49.560 me
00:41:49.680 who
00:41:49.820 I
00:41:49.940 can
00:41:50.120 retweet
00:41:50.700 and
00:41:52.000 that's
00:41:52.200 what
00:41:52.340 Twitter's
00:41:52.660 doing
00:41:52.900 now
00:41:54.640 I
00:41:54.820 know
00:41:55.140 that
00:41:56.060 I
00:41:56.220 will
00:41:56.380 be
00:41:56.700 penalized
00:41:57.820 for
00:41:59.420 associating
00:42:00.060 with
00:42:00.260 people
00:42:00.600 that
00:42:01.520 Twitter
00:42:01.920 believes
00:42:02.340 are
00:42:02.480 low
00:42:02.720 quality
00:42:03.120 are
00:42:05.000 you
00:42:05.100 okay
00:42:05.300 with
00:42:05.460 that
00:42:05.720 are
00:42:06.720 you
00:42:06.860 okay
00:42:07.040 with
00:42:07.220 that
00:42:07.460 I'm
00:42:08.840 not
00:42:09.100 I'm
00:42:09.960 not
00:42:10.120 okay
00:42:10.360 with
00:42:10.520 that
00:42:10.740 now
00:42:11.380 I
00:42:11.600 will
00:42:11.820 allow
00:42:12.800 that
00:42:13.160 there
00:42:13.300 might
00:42:13.480 be
00:42:13.620 a
00:42:13.780 better
00:42:14.020 argument
00:42:14.520 than
00:42:14.800 I'm
00:42:14.980 aware
00:42:15.260 of
00:42:15.580 for
00:42:16.680 having
00:42:17.080 this
00:42:17.520 algorithm
00:42:18.180 but
00:42:19.500 I
00:42:19.680 doubt
00:42:19.920 it's
00:42:20.120 going
00:42:20.240 to
00:42:20.280 be
00:42:20.400 good
00:42:20.580 enough
00:42:20.940 because
00:42:21.840 if
00:42:22.020 you
00:42:22.140 give
00:42:22.320 me
00:42:22.500 any
00:42:23.060 any
00:42:23.780 any
00:42:24.860 any
00:42:25.780 fucking
00:42:26.180 reason
00:42:26.600 that
00:42:27.240 I'm
00:42:27.600 cut
00:42:28.100 off
00:42:28.360 from
00:42:29.080 any
00:42:29.340 other
00:42:29.600 people
00:42:29.940 that
00:42:30.160 I
00:42:30.280 want
00:42:30.480 to
00:42:30.580 talk
00:42:30.780 to
00:42:31.040 unacceptable
00:42:32.380 completely
00:42:34.740 unacceptable
00:42:35.500 that's
00:42:37.480 my
00:42:37.640 take
00:42:37.880 and
00:42:42.000 I
00:42:42.120 don't
00:42:42.280 mind
00:42:42.520 being
00:42:42.780 canceled
00:42:43.240 because
00:42:44.320 I
00:42:44.620 would
00:42:44.720 rather
00:42:44.940 associate
00:42:45.520 any
00:42:45.840 way
00:42:45.980 I
00:42:46.120 want
00:42:46.400 that's
00:42:48.280 my
00:42:48.460 preference
00:42:48.900 all
00:42:51.540 right
00:42:51.720 let's
00:42:52.380 see
00:42:52.660 there's
00:42:53.360 a list
00:42:53.700 of
00:42:53.940 there's
00:42:54.480 a file
00:42:54.900 of
00:42:55.100 black
00:42:55.420 listed
00:42:55.740 topics
00:42:56.320 but
00:42:57.560 the
00:42:57.860 file
00:42:58.180 is
00:42:58.360 not
00:42:58.540 available
00:42:58.860 to
00:42:59.100 us
00:42:59.440 do
00:43:00.080 you
00:43:00.180 think
00:43:00.340 you
00:43:00.480 should
00:43:00.660 be
00:43:00.860 so
00:43:02.220 Elon
00:43:03.100 is in
00:43:04.260 favor
00:43:04.480 of
00:43:04.640 transparency
00:43:05.180 and
00:43:05.620 I
00:43:05.760 love
00:43:06.160 everything
00:43:06.520 about
00:43:06.820 that
00:43:07.060 so
00:43:07.360 nothing
00:43:07.980 but
00:43:08.260 compliments
00:43:08.700 for
00:43:09.060 that
00:43:09.360 but
00:43:10.360 he
00:43:10.880 released
00:43:11.260 the
00:43:11.500 code
00:43:11.980 that
00:43:12.920 determines
00:43:13.420 if you
00:43:13.820 get
00:43:13.980 boosted
00:43:14.440 or
00:43:14.600 suppressed
00:43:15.100 but
00:43:16.020 part
00:43:16.320 of
00:43:16.400 the
00:43:16.540 code
00:43:16.960 addresses
00:43:17.980 a
00:43:18.300 database
00:43:18.840 of
00:43:19.800 secret
00:43:20.760 words
00:43:21.340 and
00:43:22.820 if
00:43:22.960 you
00:43:23.120 use
00:43:23.540 accidentally
00:43:24.060 one
00:43:24.320 of
00:43:24.420 the
00:43:24.540 secret
00:43:24.820 words
00:43:25.300 you'll
00:43:25.960 get
00:43:26.100 deboosted
00:43:26.720 I
00:43:28.520 think
00:43:28.800 transparency
00:43:29.560 requires me
00:43:30.400 to know
00:43:30.740 those
00:43:30.980 words
00:43:31.380 am I
00:43:32.600 wrong
00:43:32.880 it's
00:43:33.840 not
00:43:34.040 transparency
00:43:34.640 if they
00:43:35.000 don't
00:43:35.180 tell us
00:43:35.460 what
00:43:35.660 words
00:43:36.300 deboost
00:43:37.880 me
00:43:38.120 yeah
00:43:40.040 I'm
00:43:40.380 totally
00:43:40.600 right
00:43:40.900 so
00:43:41.600 I
00:43:42.220 haven't
00:43:43.200 heard
00:43:43.500 anything
00:43:43.940 from
00:43:44.700 Musk
00:43:45.300 saying
00:43:46.080 he
00:43:46.280 would
00:43:46.580 or
00:43:46.740 would
00:43:46.920 not
00:43:47.120 release
00:43:47.600 that
00:43:48.260 database
00:43:48.600 I
00:43:49.180 feel
00:43:49.440 like
00:43:49.640 he
00:43:49.760 would
00:43:50.100 am
00:43:51.620 I
00:43:51.740 wrong
00:43:52.000 if
00:43:53.760 Elon
00:43:54.640 Musk
00:43:55.000 later
00:43:55.340 said
00:43:55.660 oh
00:43:56.080 we
00:43:56.740 can't
00:43:57.100 release
00:43:57.460 the
00:43:57.660 database
00:43:58.180 of
00:43:58.580 sensitive
00:43:59.660 words
00:44:00.100 that
00:44:00.340 deboost
00:44:00.780 you
00:44:00.960 I
00:44:01.820 would
00:44:02.000 have
00:44:02.180 some
00:44:02.420 real
00:44:02.800 concerns
00:44:03.300 about
00:44:03.580 that
00:44:04.000 real
00:44:05.540 concerns
00:44:05.980 because
00:44:06.480 that
00:44:06.820 would
00:44:07.280 allow
00:44:07.540 you
00:44:07.760 to
00:44:07.980 boost
00:44:08.260 or
00:44:08.420 deboost
00:44:08.800 anything
00:44:09.400 independent
00:44:11.020 of all
00:44:11.580 those
00:44:11.800 other
00:44:12.040 rules
00:44:12.460 I
00:44:13.660 mean
00:44:13.780 maybe
00:44:14.000 all
00:44:14.260 the
00:44:14.400 other
00:44:14.600 rules
00:44:14.860 don't
00:44:15.120 even
00:44:15.300 kick
00:44:15.580 in
00:44:15.840 if
00:44:16.120 you
00:44:16.220 hit
00:44:16.360 one
00:44:16.520 of
00:44:16.620 those
00:44:16.800 bad
00:44:17.060 words
00:44:17.460 do
00:44:18.320 you
00:44:18.420 think
00:44:18.840 that
00:44:19.180 you're
00:44:19.840 going
00:44:19.920 to
00:44:19.980 get
00:44:20.160 an
00:44:20.360 extra
00:44:20.620 boost
00:44:20.960 for
00:44:21.180 having
00:44:21.460 an
00:44:21.680 image
00:44:21.960 attached
00:44:22.420 if
00:44:23.400 you
00:44:23.540 said
00:44:23.740 a
00:44:23.860 bad
00:44:24.060 word
00:44:24.360 you
00:44:25.180 know
00:44:25.280 one
00:44:25.420 of
00:44:25.500 the
00:44:25.600 banned
00:44:25.940 categories
00:44:26.880 I
00:44:27.580 don't
00:44:27.700 think
00:44:27.940 so
00:44:28.220 my
00:44:28.860 guess
00:44:29.360 and I
00:44:29.740 don't
00:44:29.900 know
00:44:30.080 this
00:44:30.360 this
00:44:30.660 is
00:44:30.820 speculation
00:44:31.280 is
00:44:32.060 more
00:44:32.520 like
00:44:32.820 how
00:44:33.220 I
00:44:33.460 would
00:44:33.600 have
00:44:33.700 built
00:44:33.860 the
00:44:34.040 system
00:44:34.360 if
00:44:35.400 the
00:44:35.580 banned
00:44:35.940 words
00:44:36.320 really
00:44:36.660 matter
00:44:37.100 they
00:44:38.860 would
00:44:39.060 cancel
00:44:39.440 all
00:44:39.740 the
00:44:39.900 rest
00:44:40.080 of
00:44:40.200 the
00:44:40.280 algorithm
00:44:40.740 am
00:44:41.000 I
00:44:41.120 right
00:44:41.380 because
00:44:42.740 that
00:44:42.920 would
00:44:43.160 be
00:44:43.260 the
00:44:43.400 top
00:44:43.600 priority
00:44:44.040 because
00:44:45.060 if
00:44:45.220 you
00:44:45.340 said
00:44:45.640 the
00:44:46.140 Holocaust
00:44:50.620 I
00:44:51.580 don't
00:44:51.700 think
00:44:51.940 so
00:44:52.200 I
00:44:53.500 think
00:44:53.840 there's
00:44:54.060 nothing
00:44:54.400 you
00:44:54.640 can
00:44:54.820 do
00:44:55.160 if
00:44:55.960 you
00:44:56.120 trip
00:44:56.360 one
00:44:56.580 of
00:44:56.700 the
00:44:56.800 bad
00:44:57.080 words
00:44:57.520 that's
00:44:58.040 my
00:44:58.200 guess
00:44:58.560 because
00:44:59.180 that's
00:44:59.380 the
00:44:59.460 way
00:44:59.580 I
00:44:59.740 would
00:44:59.860 have
00:44:59.940 built
00:45:00.120 it
00:45:00.360 I
00:45:01.120 would
00:45:01.240 have
00:45:01.340 built
00:45:01.520 it
00:45:01.680 you
00:45:01.840 hit
00:45:02.000 that
00:45:02.160 word
00:45:02.420 you're
00:45:02.620 done
00:45:02.860 there's
00:45:03.800 nothing
00:45:04.020 else
00:45:04.240 to
00:45:04.400 talk
00:45:04.620 about
00:45:04.880 now
00:45:07.000 in
00:45:09.220 normal
00:45:09.660 communications
00:45:10.400 I
00:45:12.600 will
00:45:12.860 swear
00:45:13.340 because
00:45:14.220 sometimes
00:45:14.620 it
00:45:14.860 brings
00:45:15.100 attention
00:45:15.500 to
00:45:15.800 something
00:45:16.080 that
00:45:16.280 you
00:45:16.380 want
00:45:16.580 to
00:45:16.760 highlight
00:45:17.220 as
00:45:17.720 I
00:45:17.820 just
00:45:18.020 did
00:45:18.320 right
00:45:20.620 so
00:45:21.820 in
00:45:22.100 normal
00:45:22.420 communications
00:45:23.100 a
00:45:24.200 strategic
00:45:24.880 amount
00:45:25.620 of
00:45:26.240 inappropriateness
00:45:27.380 is actually
00:45:28.000 good
00:45:28.380 communication
00:45:29.100 did you
00:45:29.620 know
00:45:29.760 that
00:45:30.020 doing
00:45:30.940 something
00:45:31.260 that
00:45:31.480 sort
00:45:31.700 of
00:45:31.840 violates
00:45:32.360 an
00:45:32.520 expectation
00:45:33.200 shocks
00:45:34.400 you
00:45:34.620 just
00:45:34.860 a
00:45:35.040 little
00:45:35.200 bit
00:45:35.480 is
00:45:36.120 actually
00:45:36.400 part
00:45:36.860 of
00:45:37.620 effective
00:45:38.020 communications
00:45:38.760 but
00:45:40.280 Twitter
00:45:40.620 is
00:45:40.820 going
00:45:40.940 to
00:45:41.020 say
00:45:41.260 oh
00:45:41.520 you
00:45:41.680 use
00:45:41.900 one
00:45:42.100 of
00:45:42.200 those
00:45:42.500 attention
00:45:43.500 getting
00:45:43.840 words
00:45:44.340 I'm
00:45:45.780 going
00:45:46.080 to
00:45:46.140 give
00:45:46.280 you
00:45:46.380 no
00:45:46.540 attention
00:45:46.900 I
00:45:47.960 think
00:45:48.160 that
00:45:48.320 one
00:45:48.440 needs
00:45:48.640 to
00:45:48.780 be
00:45:48.960 reexamined
00:45:50.480 or
00:45:51.380 we
00:45:51.760 need
00:45:51.940 to
00:45:52.080 see
00:45:52.220 the
00:45:52.400 list
00:45:52.740 I
00:45:54.860 say
00:45:55.020 need
00:45:55.380 but
00:45:55.620 it's
00:45:55.800 more
00:45:55.960 a
00:45:56.140 request
00:45:56.600 I
00:45:57.380 would
00:45:57.600 request
00:45:58.200 and
00:45:59.220 in
00:45:59.620 the
00:46:00.020 name
00:46:00.200 of
00:46:00.340 transparency
00:46:00.840 I
00:46:01.080 think
00:46:01.220 we
00:46:01.340 should
00:46:01.500 see
00:46:01.660 the
00:46:01.780 band
00:46:01.980 words
00:46:02.260 it
00:46:02.980 could
00:46:03.160 be
00:46:03.320 that
00:46:03.480 when
00:46:03.640 you
00:46:03.760 see
00:46:03.960 them
00:46:04.140 you'll
00:46:04.380 agree
00:46:04.640 with
00:46:04.820 them
00:46:04.940 totally
00:46:05.260 right
00:46:05.600 it's
00:46:06.220 going
00:46:06.340 to
00:46:06.360 be
00:46:06.460 a
00:46:06.540 bunch
00:46:06.700 of
00:46:06.960 anti
00:46:07.540 Semitic
00:46:08.020 stuff
00:46:08.480 and
00:46:08.720 you're
00:46:09.560 going
00:46:09.640 to
00:46:09.660 look
00:46:09.820 at
00:46:09.940 them
00:46:10.040 and
00:46:10.100 say
00:46:10.240 all
00:46:10.500 right
00:46:10.740 I
00:46:11.220 agree
00:46:11.500 but
00:46:13.260 we
00:46:13.400 should
00:46:13.540 know
00:46:13.780 New
00:46:16.020 York
00:46:16.200 Times
00:46:16.500 said
00:46:16.740 it's
00:46:16.900 not
00:46:17.080 going
00:46:17.180 to
00:46:17.280 pay
00:46:17.460 for
00:46:17.840 Twitter
00:46:18.800 so
00:46:19.780 it's
00:46:19.960 not
00:46:20.180 going
00:46:20.320 to
00:46:20.380 get
00:46:20.520 verified
00:46:21.020 why
00:46:24.440 is
00:46:24.680 that
00:46:24.980 is
00:46:26.740 that
00:46:26.880 such
00:46:27.120 a
00:46:27.280 big
00:46:27.480 expense
00:46:28.000 $10
00:46:28.980 a
00:46:29.420 month
00:46:29.620 that
00:46:30.740 New
00:46:31.420 York
00:46:31.540 Times
00:46:31.900 doesn't
00:46:33.400 want
00:46:33.560 to
00:46:33.780 pay
00:46:34.940 for
00:46:35.140 their
00:46:35.420 reporters
00:46:36.920 to be
00:46:37.220 on
00:46:37.340 Twitter
00:46:37.580 and
00:46:38.700 verified
00:46:39.160 and
00:46:39.880 are
00:46:39.960 you
00:46:40.080 telling
00:46:40.260 me
00:46:40.440 that
00:46:40.660 a
00:46:40.900 reporter
00:46:41.380 a
00:46:42.380 New
00:46:42.520 York
00:46:42.680 Times
00:46:42.960 reporter
00:46:43.480 are
00:46:44.280 you
00:46:44.400 telling
00:46:44.580 me
00:46:44.720 that
00:46:44.860 they
00:46:45.000 won't
00:46:45.200 just
00:46:45.380 get
00:46:45.560 their
00:46:45.700 own
00:46:45.940 verification
00:46:46.540 for
00:46:48.160 $10
00:46:48.420 a
00:46:48.840 month
00:46:49.060 because
00:46:50.120 don't
00:46:50.340 you
00:46:50.480 think
00:46:50.660 New
00:46:50.860 York
00:46:50.960 Times
00:46:51.180 reporters
00:46:51.640 want
00:46:51.920 to
00:46:52.000 have
00:46:52.140 lots
00:46:52.400 of
00:46:52.520 followers
00:46:52.900 because
00:46:53.840 that's
00:46:54.060 how
00:46:54.200 they
00:46:54.440 get
00:46:54.720 their
00:46:54.880 own
00:46:55.080 stories
00:46:55.440 boosted
00:46:55.960 they
00:46:56.300 tweet
00:46:56.540 their
00:46:56.720 own
00:46:56.880 story
00:46:57.240 that's
00:46:58.180 what
00:46:58.300 gets
00:46:58.560 it
00:46:58.700 boosted
00:46:59.100 that's
00:46:59.400 how
00:46:59.500 they
00:46:59.620 get
00:46:59.840 raises
00:47:00.280 and
00:47:00.580 better
00:47:00.820 jobs
00:47:01.220 so
00:47:03.540 maybe
00:47:04.820 the
00:47:05.100 company
00:47:05.480 New
00:47:05.720 York
00:47:05.860 Times
00:47:06.140 won't
00:47:06.520 pay
00:47:06.820 for
00:47:07.140 pay
00:47:09.240 for
00:47:09.500 what
00:47:09.720 you
00:47:13.480 but
00:47:13.980 my
00:47:14.200 comment
00:47:14.520 on
00:47:14.780 this
00:47:15.000 is
00:47:15.220 if
00:47:15.460 the
00:47:15.600 New
00:47:15.720 York
00:47:15.880 Times
00:47:16.220 gets
00:47:16.520 de-boosted
00:47:17.320 I
00:47:18.380 don't
00:47:18.560 know
00:47:18.700 if
00:47:18.820 that's
00:47:19.020 bad
00:47:19.280 it's
00:47:20.880 just
00:47:21.040 one
00:47:21.280 more
00:47:21.480 fake
00:47:21.800 news
00:47:22.220 entity
00:47:22.620 getting
00:47:22.940 de-boosted
00:47:23.640 so
00:47:24.020 what's
00:47:24.980 the
00:47:25.080 difference
00:47:25.400 what's
00:47:28.340 that
00:47:28.460 say
00:47:28.720 all
00:47:32.100 right
00:47:32.320 according
00:47:34.480 to the
00:47:34.740 Wall
00:47:34.900 Street
00:47:35.080 Journal
00:47:35.380 the
00:47:35.920 number
00:47:37.220 of
00:47:37.400 people
00:47:37.620 who
00:47:37.880 think
00:47:38.220 that
00:47:38.440 college
00:47:39.080 degree
00:47:39.360 is
00:47:39.580 a
00:47:39.700 good
00:47:39.840 idea
00:47:40.220 is
00:47:40.580 way
00:47:40.800 down
00:47:41.160 42%
00:47:44.740 of
00:47:44.980 people
00:47:45.240 in
00:47:45.480 the
00:47:45.640 recent
00:47:45.920 survey
00:47:46.360 said
00:47:47.480 getting
00:47:47.780 a
00:47:47.980 college
00:47:48.260 degree
00:47:48.540 isn't
00:47:48.800 worth
00:47:49.040 it
00:47:49.260 and
00:47:51.280 that's
00:47:51.480 a
00:47:51.580 big
00:47:51.740 increase
00:47:52.120 from
00:47:52.320 what
00:47:52.480 they
00:47:52.600 used
00:47:52.780 to
00:47:52.880 say
00:47:53.080 what
00:47:56.180 do
00:47:56.260 you
00:47:56.360 think
00:47:56.660 do
00:47:58.400 you
00:47:58.520 think
00:47:58.660 this
00:47:58.880 story
00:47:59.220 is
00:47:59.420 accurately
00:47:59.960 reported
00:48:00.580 that
00:48:02.120 42%
00:48:02.940 of
00:48:03.160 people
00:48:03.660 think
00:48:03.980 college
00:48:04.380 degrees
00:48:04.760 aren't
00:48:05.000 worth
00:48:05.200 it
00:48:05.520 no
00:48:07.360 it's
00:48:07.520 not
00:48:07.720 accurately
00:48:08.180 reported
00:48:08.740 it's
00:48:09.500 not
00:48:09.720 accurately
00:48:10.240 reported
00:48:10.720 at all
00:48:11.320 it's
00:48:11.900 not
00:48:12.060 even
00:48:12.240 close
00:48:12.560 to
00:48:12.740 accurately
00:48:13.180 reported
00:48:13.760 allow
00:48:14.720 me
00:48:14.980 to
00:48:15.160 help
00:48:15.460 people
00:48:16.940 who
00:48:17.180 got
00:48:17.460 bullshit
00:48:17.960 degrees
00:48:18.600 realize
00:48:19.180 that
00:48:19.560 they
00:48:19.700 were
00:48:19.840 bullshit
00:48:20.240 people
00:48:21.380 who
00:48:21.580 got
00:48:21.820 engineering
00:48:22.380 degrees
00:48:22.980 are
00:48:23.580 enjoying
00:48:23.940 their
00:48:24.200 careers
00:48:24.640 and
00:48:24.940 making
00:48:25.180 lots
00:48:25.480 of
00:48:25.640 money
00:48:25.900 that's
00:48:28.500 the
00:48:28.680 story
00:48:29.040 the
00:48:30.040 story
00:48:30.400 is
00:48:30.620 colleges
00:48:31.200 are
00:48:31.800 offering
00:48:32.280 bullshit
00:48:32.820 and
00:48:33.840 mostly
00:48:34.620 women
00:48:35.080 if
00:48:38.540 I
00:48:38.700 may
00:48:38.900 be
00:48:39.080 sexist
00:48:39.540 for a
00:48:39.820 moment
00:48:40.060 not
00:48:41.460 you know
00:48:41.860 not
00:48:42.040 completely
00:48:42.500 women
00:48:42.860 of course
00:48:43.300 but
00:48:44.100 more
00:48:44.760 women
00:48:45.080 than
00:48:45.280 men
00:48:45.620 are
00:48:46.240 taking
00:48:46.560 the
00:48:46.920 let's
00:48:47.980 say
00:48:48.140 the
00:48:48.380 majors
00:48:49.260 that
00:48:49.560 don't
00:48:49.720 have
00:48:49.900 a
00:48:50.000 big
00:48:50.180 career
00:48:50.640 boost
00:48:51.100 and
00:48:53.280 more
00:48:53.460 men
00:48:53.720 than
00:48:53.860 women
00:48:54.080 are
00:48:54.320 taking
00:48:54.800 STEM
00:48:55.220 classes
00:48:56.040 so
00:48:57.440 I
00:48:59.240 don't
00:48:59.400 know
00:48:59.580 it
00:49:00.200 looks
00:49:00.360 to me
00:49:01.460 exactly
00:49:01.920 the way
00:49:02.300 it's
00:49:02.460 supposed
00:49:02.680 to
00:49:02.900 look
00:49:03.200 to
00:49:04.760 me
00:49:05.040 people
00:49:05.900 who
00:49:06.100 get
00:49:06.620 valuable
00:49:07.180 degrees
00:49:07.860 believe
00:49:08.720 they
00:49:08.940 got
00:49:09.160 valuable
00:49:09.600 degrees
00:49:10.220 and
00:49:10.900 the
00:49:11.020 people
00:49:11.240 who
00:49:11.600 took
00:49:12.320 courses
00:49:12.700 that
00:49:12.960 were
00:49:13.080 clearly
00:49:13.480 not
00:49:13.780 valuable
00:49:14.220 know
00:49:15.340 that
00:49:15.560 they
00:49:15.700 took
00:49:15.920 courses
00:49:16.260 that
00:49:16.460 are
00:49:16.580 clearly
00:49:16.900 not
00:49:17.160 valuable
00:49:17.540 now
00:49:18.260 may
00:49:18.700 I
00:49:18.880 add
00:49:19.180 a
00:49:19.520 super
00:49:19.880 sexist
00:49:20.460 commentary
00:49:20.900 on this
00:49:21.440 who's up
00:49:22.320 for
00:49:22.460 super
00:49:22.800 sexism
00:49:23.360 super
00:49:24.500 sexism
00:49:25.080 anybody
00:49:25.460 in the
00:49:26.940 form of
00:49:27.300 entertainment
00:49:27.780 super
00:49:28.840 sexism
00:49:29.380 I forgot
00:49:31.600 what I was
00:49:31.920 going to
00:49:32.080 say
00:49:32.320 I
00:49:35.460 actually
00:49:35.740 did
00:49:35.960 forget
00:49:36.220 what I
00:49:36.500 was
00:49:36.620 going
00:49:36.740 to
00:49:36.840 say
00:49:37.100 it
00:49:37.980 will
00:49:38.060 come
00:49:38.200 back
00:49:38.420 to
00:49:38.540 me
00:49:38.760 yeah
00:49:43.300 it
00:49:43.800 was
00:49:44.160 really
00:49:44.360 good
00:49:44.600 though
00:49:44.800 you
00:49:45.460 know
00:49:45.580 if
00:49:45.780 you'd
00:49:46.020 heard
00:49:46.240 it
00:49:46.500 I
00:49:47.220 believe
00:49:47.500 you
00:49:47.640 would
00:49:47.780 have
00:49:47.880 enjoyed
00:49:48.200 it
00:49:49.400 yeah
00:49:49.780 it
00:49:51.520 will
00:49:51.580 come
00:49:51.720 back
00:49:51.900 to
00:49:52.000 me
00:49:52.420 all
00:49:53.860 right
00:49:54.080 let's
00:49:57.880 see
00:49:58.160 women
00:49:59.100 and
00:49:59.420 older
00:49:59.720 Americans
00:50:00.180 are
00:50:00.660 driving
00:50:01.020 the
00:50:01.240 decline
00:50:01.680 in
00:50:01.880 confidence
00:50:02.280 in
00:50:02.580 college
00:50:02.980 why
00:50:03.760 do
00:50:03.880 you
00:50:03.980 think
00:50:04.140 it
00:50:04.280 is
00:50:04.460 that
00:50:04.640 women
00:50:04.920 and
00:50:05.220 older
00:50:05.560 Americans
00:50:06.080 are
00:50:06.360 driving
00:50:06.740 oh
00:50:07.200 I
00:50:07.780 got
00:50:08.000 it
00:50:08.180 I
00:50:08.380 just
00:50:08.560 remembered
00:50:08.860 the
00:50:09.080 super
00:50:09.360 sexist
00:50:09.800 thing
00:50:10.060 correct me
00:50:11.980 if I'm
00:50:12.280 wrong
00:50:12.600 but
00:50:13.920 when I
00:50:14.300 went to
00:50:14.620 college
00:50:14.920 a billion
00:50:15.420 years
00:50:15.760 ago
00:50:16.100 it
00:50:17.580 was
00:50:17.740 a
00:50:17.900 common
00:50:18.240 joke
00:50:18.680 very
00:50:19.080 sexist
00:50:19.580 joke
00:50:19.920 to
00:50:20.760 say
00:50:20.980 that
00:50:21.280 if
00:50:21.860 a
00:50:22.080 young
00:50:22.440 woman
00:50:22.720 was
00:50:22.960 in
00:50:23.120 college
00:50:23.520 that
00:50:24.280 she
00:50:24.480 was
00:50:24.640 there
00:50:24.840 for
00:50:25.100 MRS
00:50:25.840 degree
00:50:26.240 you've
00:50:27.320 heard
00:50:27.460 that
00:50:27.680 right
00:50:27.960 the
00:50:29.060 MRS
00:50:29.660 degree
00:50:30.000 now
00:50:31.980 that
00:50:33.340 would be
00:50:33.660 one good
00:50:34.200 reason
00:50:34.500 to go
00:50:34.780 to
00:50:34.900 college
00:50:35.260 and
00:50:35.820 people
00:50:36.160 who
00:50:36.360 went
00:50:36.540 to
00:50:36.680 college
00:50:36.960 and
00:50:37.240 got
00:50:37.780 married
00:50:38.120 and
00:50:38.420 met
00:50:38.620 their
00:50:38.780 future
00:50:39.140 husband
00:50:39.540 or
00:50:40.660 future
00:50:40.980 wife
00:50:41.300 would
00:50:41.640 probably
00:50:41.860 have a
00:50:42.120 better
00:50:42.360 view
00:50:42.760 of
00:50:42.920 marriage
00:50:43.300 or
00:50:43.600 better
00:50:44.040 view
00:50:44.300 of
00:50:44.440 college
00:50:44.780 because
00:50:45.580 college
00:50:45.960 definitely
00:50:47.120 had that
00:50:47.600 benefit
00:50:47.980 it makes
00:50:48.380 you more
00:50:48.820 marriageable
00:50:49.680 I would
00:50:50.920 also argue
00:50:51.560 that a
00:50:53.600 woman who
00:50:54.000 wants to
00:50:54.420 bag a
00:50:55.040 high income
00:50:55.980 husband
00:50:56.560 which I
00:50:57.760 believe is
00:50:58.320 from
00:50:59.080 biological
00:50:59.760 reasons
00:51:00.580 is entirely
00:51:01.320 appropriate
00:51:01.860 it's just
00:51:03.680 a natural
00:51:04.080 impulse
00:51:04.500 that the
00:51:05.440 best way
00:51:05.820 to do
00:51:06.060 that would
00:51:06.420 be to
00:51:06.660 go to
00:51:06.900 college
00:51:07.180 yourself
00:51:07.600 even if
00:51:08.120 you got
00:51:08.340 a
00:51:08.460 bullshit
00:51:08.700 degree
00:51:09.140 am I
00:51:09.520 right
00:51:09.720 a woman
00:51:11.400 with a
00:51:11.780 bullshit
00:51:12.080 college
00:51:12.560 degree
00:51:12.960 is more
00:51:14.100 likely
00:51:14.480 to attach
00:51:15.260 to get
00:51:16.640 a high
00:51:17.140 income
00:51:17.440 husband
00:51:17.800 because
00:51:18.920 the high
00:51:19.280 income
00:51:19.560 husband
00:51:20.000 is looking
00:51:20.840 for somebody
00:51:21.680 who has
00:51:21.980 maybe
00:51:22.820 similar
00:51:23.260 credentials
00:51:23.820 now
00:51:26.880 fast
00:51:27.500 forward
00:51:27.800 to today
00:51:28.440 does
00:51:29.840 your
00:51:30.040 college
00:51:30.620 experience
00:51:31.220 help you
00:51:31.680 get married
00:51:32.240 in 2023
00:51:33.080 yes or
00:51:34.880 no
00:51:35.080 no
00:51:36.020 it makes
00:51:36.640 it far
00:51:37.020 less likely
00:51:37.640 you'll get
00:51:37.980 married
00:51:38.280 because
00:51:39.560 college
00:51:40.080 is what
00:51:40.460 makes
00:51:41.340 you
00:51:41.580 unappealing
00:51:42.220 to men
00:51:42.680 in 2023
00:51:44.480 let me
00:51:46.100 say that
00:51:46.460 again
00:51:46.760 in the
00:51:48.060 70s
00:51:48.720 a woman
00:51:50.100 with a
00:51:50.460 college
00:51:50.780 degree
00:51:51.200 any
00:51:51.720 kind
00:51:52.100 any
00:51:52.660 kind
00:51:52.900 of
00:51:53.000 college
00:51:53.260 degree
00:51:53.560 I
00:51:54.160 would
00:51:54.340 automatically
00:51:54.860 say
00:51:55.280 hmm
00:51:55.740 there's
00:51:57.180 somebody
00:51:57.440 I could
00:51:57.720 have a
00:51:57.940 conversation
00:51:58.460 with
00:51:58.880 alright
00:51:59.620 alright
00:52:00.040 if they
00:52:00.740 needed
00:52:00.980 to work
00:52:01.520 optionally
00:52:02.740 if they
00:52:03.240 needed
00:52:03.460 to
00:52:03.680 maybe
00:52:04.500 a little
00:52:04.780 boost
00:52:05.180 and I
00:52:05.980 would say
00:52:06.260 that's
00:52:06.640 definitely
00:52:07.040 like one
00:52:08.240 more variable
00:52:08.880 in the
00:52:09.280 marriageable
00:52:09.820 department
00:52:10.340 now
00:52:11.000 I would
00:52:11.720 not
00:52:11.900 limit
00:52:12.200 myself
00:52:12.620 to
00:52:12.800 somebody
00:52:13.060 who
00:52:13.180 went
00:52:13.300 to
00:52:13.440 college
00:52:13.800 that's
00:52:15.100 not like
00:52:15.440 a requirement
00:52:15.980 or anything
00:52:16.420 but
00:52:17.180 it'd be
00:52:17.700 one thing
00:52:18.140 you'd put
00:52:18.520 on the
00:52:18.940 good pile
00:52:20.100 right
00:52:20.780 and in fact
00:52:21.820 my first
00:52:22.480 marriage
00:52:23.620 was not
00:52:25.040 like that
00:52:25.460 so
00:52:26.380 it wasn't
00:52:27.740 something that
00:52:28.240 I had
00:52:28.500 high on
00:52:28.900 my own
00:52:29.420 list
00:52:29.840 but it's
00:52:30.600 a plus
00:52:30.960 it's a
00:52:31.660 little bit
00:52:31.900 of a plus
00:52:32.380 now
00:52:33.540 in 2023
00:52:34.320 would you
00:52:35.080 want
00:52:35.500 to even
00:52:36.620 associate
00:52:37.200 with a
00:52:37.980 young
00:52:38.200 woman
00:52:38.480 who
00:52:38.920 had
00:52:39.220 a
00:52:39.440 typical
00:52:40.000 liberal
00:52:41.100 arts
00:52:41.820 college
00:52:42.840 degree
00:52:43.280 I
00:52:44.500 wouldn't
00:52:44.740 even
00:52:44.920 want
00:52:45.080 to
00:52:45.140 have
00:52:45.260 a
00:52:45.360 conversation
00:52:45.920 and I'm
00:52:47.880 not even
00:52:48.220 joking
00:52:48.560 that's like
00:52:49.840 an actual
00:52:50.340 serious
00:52:50.980 opinion
00:52:51.440 no
00:52:52.000 hyperbole
00:52:52.620 I would
00:52:53.560 not be
00:52:54.000 interested
00:52:54.440 in a
00:52:55.000 conversation
00:52:55.720 of any
00:52:57.160 kind
00:52:57.580 of any
00:52:59.480 kind
00:52:59.900 because I
00:53:02.840 believe that
00:53:03.420 young
00:53:04.300 women
00:53:04.620 who are
00:53:05.340 going to
00:53:05.740 college
00:53:06.100 have been
00:53:07.360 brainwashed
00:53:10.320 or polluted
00:53:11.000 or educated
00:53:11.900 if you want
00:53:12.640 to say it
00:53:12.980 in a positive
00:53:13.380 way
00:53:13.640 educated
00:53:14.220 to have
00:53:15.180 a negative
00:53:15.620 opinion
00:53:16.020 about me
00:53:16.680 before
00:53:18.020 they've
00:53:18.340 met me
00:53:18.880 am I
00:53:20.020 right
00:53:20.300 when I
00:53:21.860 walk into
00:53:22.340 a room
00:53:22.700 do I
00:53:22.960 look like
00:53:23.340 I'm part
00:53:23.660 of the
00:53:23.860 patriarchy
00:53:24.440 oh yeah
00:53:25.880 I got
00:53:27.700 patriarchy
00:53:28.300 written all
00:53:28.820 over me
00:53:29.260 I mean
00:53:30.440 my middle
00:53:31.000 name is
00:53:31.360 patriarchy
00:53:32.020 yeah
00:53:33.020 you see
00:53:33.720 this
00:53:33.980 white guy
00:53:35.800 of a
00:53:36.080 certain
00:53:36.280 age
00:53:36.560 walk
00:53:36.820 into
00:53:37.020 a
00:53:37.200 room
00:53:37.380 I
00:53:38.020 assume
00:53:38.640 anybody
00:53:39.680 under
00:53:40.060 25
00:53:40.620 dislikes
00:53:41.160 me
00:53:41.420 I
00:53:43.080 just
00:53:43.280 assume
00:53:43.680 because they
00:53:44.720 would be
00:53:45.020 trained
00:53:45.480 that I
00:53:46.560 am the
00:53:46.840 devil
00:53:47.120 and if I
00:53:48.640 said you
00:53:48.940 know I
00:53:49.780 used to
00:53:50.100 think
00:53:50.380 Donald
00:53:51.260 Trump had
00:53:51.780 some good
00:53:52.160 tools
00:53:52.600 in 2016
00:53:54.060 I thought
00:53:54.540 he'd be
00:53:55.000 solid
00:53:55.520 president
00:53:55.920 I would
00:53:56.700 never be
00:53:57.120 able to
00:53:57.340 have any
00:53:57.880 conversation
00:53:58.500 with a
00:53:59.580 young woman
00:54:00.120 after they
00:54:00.800 knew that
00:54:01.340 that'd be
00:54:02.280 the end
00:54:02.580 of it
00:54:03.400 so
00:54:04.540 the value
00:54:06.600 of college
00:54:07.120 has decreased
00:54:07.760 not just
00:54:08.380 for its
00:54:08.820 economic
00:54:09.800 value
00:54:10.260 well I
00:54:11.440 guess getting
00:54:11.800 married is
00:54:12.920 an economic
00:54:13.420 value
00:54:13.780 yeah I
00:54:14.280 guess it's
00:54:14.600 all fall
00:54:14.940 of the
00:54:15.160 money
00:54:15.380 isn't it
00:54:16.220 even getting
00:54:17.060 married is
00:54:17.620 basically an
00:54:18.580 economic
00:54:19.020 plan
00:54:19.400 was that
00:54:23.160 sexist
00:54:23.820 enough
00:54:24.360 or just
00:54:25.280 right
00:54:25.640 was it
00:54:27.000 just right
00:54:27.440 I think
00:54:28.840 that was
00:54:29.680 just enough
00:54:30.360 spiciness
00:54:30.980 to get
00:54:32.780 you a
00:54:33.020 little
00:54:33.220 extra
00:54:33.860 flavor
00:54:34.240 there
00:54:34.560 all right
00:54:35.420 you're
00:54:36.260 welcome
00:54:36.540 I asked
00:54:39.140 this question
00:54:40.240 on Twitter
00:54:41.000 in my
00:54:42.180 highly
00:54:42.560 scientific
00:54:43.240 Twitter poll
00:54:44.140 what is
00:54:45.360 the bigger
00:54:45.740 risk to
00:54:46.200 America
00:54:46.580 climate
00:54:47.120 change
00:54:47.660 or the
00:54:48.820 combination
00:54:49.260 of DEI
00:54:50.200 CRT
00:54:51.040 and ESG
00:54:52.060 well
00:54:53.280 this might
00:54:54.320 say more
00:54:54.880 about my
00:54:55.360 audience
00:54:55.820 than it
00:54:56.380 does about
00:54:56.760 the topic
00:54:57.240 but the
00:54:58.400 answer was
00:54:58.940 4%
00:54:59.760 thought
00:55:00.360 climate
00:55:01.400 change
00:55:01.760 was the
00:55:02.100 bigger
00:55:02.260 risk
00:55:02.620 and 96%
00:55:04.520 thought the
00:55:05.420 bigger
00:55:05.760 existential
00:55:06.800 risk to
00:55:07.520 America
00:55:07.880 was
00:55:08.320 DEI
00:55:09.520 CRT
00:55:10.180 and ESG
00:55:10.940 and I
00:55:11.960 agree with
00:55:12.360 that
00:55:12.640 I agree
00:55:13.920 with that
00:55:14.360 and to
00:55:15.820 me that's
00:55:16.200 obvious
00:55:16.620 because with
00:55:18.220 climate change
00:55:19.060 it could
00:55:20.600 get bad
00:55:21.140 but we'll
00:55:22.300 find ways
00:55:22.880 to adjust
00:55:23.440 and compensate
00:55:24.320 and we'll
00:55:25.280 figure it out
00:55:25.860 no matter
00:55:27.240 what happens
00:55:27.700 with climate
00:55:28.260 no matter
00:55:28.840 who's causing
00:55:29.440 it or not
00:55:30.280 causing it
00:55:30.860 I feel like
00:55:31.880 we're going
00:55:32.120 to figure
00:55:32.420 that out
00:55:32.900 but the
00:55:35.240 DEI
00:55:35.800 CRT
00:55:36.320 ESG
00:55:36.780 stuff
00:55:37.180 that could
00:55:39.060 be a
00:55:39.320 kill shot
00:55:39.860 to me
00:55:41.300 that could
00:55:41.660 be a
00:55:41.900 kill shot
00:55:42.420 that could
00:55:43.400 take you
00:55:43.900 right off
00:55:44.360 of the
00:55:44.580 map
00:55:44.900 because this
00:55:46.420 is a
00:55:46.840 bug in
00:55:47.240 the software
00:55:47.840 right
00:55:49.440 climate
00:55:50.900 change
00:55:51.360 is sort
00:55:51.720 of a
00:55:51.920 hardware
00:55:52.260 problem
00:55:52.800 literally
00:55:54.460 we build
00:55:55.720 machines
00:55:56.360 you know
00:55:58.560 this is
00:55:58.940 the climate
00:55:59.600 change
00:55:59.980 story
00:56:00.360 we build
00:56:01.160 machines
00:56:01.640 the machines
00:56:02.260 do bad
00:56:03.020 things for
00:56:03.480 the climate
00:56:04.480 so that's
00:56:06.880 a hardware
00:56:07.620 problem
00:56:08.140 we can fix
00:56:09.180 hardware
00:56:09.600 problems
00:56:10.260 fairly
00:56:11.560 reliably
00:56:12.140 if we have
00:56:12.800 time to
00:56:13.220 do it
00:56:13.600 but the
00:56:15.200 DEI
00:56:15.800 CRT
00:56:16.300 ESG
00:56:16.680 is a
00:56:17.040 psychological
00:56:17.560 problem
00:56:18.160 that I'll
00:56:18.960 call a
00:56:19.280 software
00:56:19.600 problem
00:56:20.080 a software
00:56:21.140 problem
00:56:21.520 can take
00:56:21.920 you offline
00:56:22.360 right away
00:56:23.040 and can
00:56:24.280 put you out
00:56:24.700 of business
00:56:25.040 forever
00:56:25.420 you know
00:56:26.420 if it's
00:56:26.680 bad enough
00:56:27.180 so I
00:56:28.880 think people
00:56:29.280 are right
00:56:29.640 now obviously
00:56:31.240 if it were
00:56:31.820 a democrat
00:56:32.560 majority
00:56:33.400 voting for
00:56:34.100 this it
00:56:34.460 would be
00:56:34.720 opposite I
00:56:35.440 assume
00:56:35.660 but I
00:56:37.060 don't think
00:56:37.400 democrats
00:56:37.880 have a
00:56:38.260 full
00:56:38.480 understanding
00:56:39.060 of the
00:56:39.700 cost
00:56:40.840 let's say
00:56:42.540 the unintended
00:56:43.100 cost
00:56:43.760 of all of
00:56:44.780 the equity
00:56:45.280 stuff
00:56:45.660 the unintended
00:56:46.920 cost is
00:56:47.740 that it's
00:56:48.040 driving
00:56:48.460 population
00:56:49.700 that you
00:56:50.760 want to
00:56:51.260 interact
00:56:51.700 with
00:56:52.020 because they
00:56:52.600 have all
00:56:52.860 the resources
00:56:53.420 and the
00:56:53.800 jobs
00:56:54.160 that population
00:56:55.640 wants to have
00:56:56.320 nothing to do
00:56:57.700 with you
00:56:58.080 if you're
00:56:59.260 infected with
00:56:59.980 that mindset
00:57:00.900 it's not about
00:57:02.500 race
00:57:02.920 you know
00:57:04.780 white or black
00:57:05.520 young or old
00:57:06.240 if you have
00:57:06.700 this mindset
00:57:07.320 that white
00:57:08.640 people took
00:57:09.180 all your stuff
00:57:09.800 and they better
00:57:10.260 give it back
00:57:11.140 I don't want
00:57:12.360 to be around
00:57:12.800 you
00:57:13.060 I don't want
00:57:14.200 to have anything
00:57:14.740 to do with
00:57:15.280 you at all
00:57:16.320 not economically
00:57:17.820 not socially
00:57:19.120 not in any
00:57:20.360 way
00:57:20.580 I don't want
00:57:21.040 to have any
00:57:21.440 involvement
00:57:22.020 with people
00:57:22.620 who are
00:57:23.480 poisoned
00:57:23.940 mentally
00:57:24.940 poisoned
00:57:25.460 alright
00:57:27.960 so
00:57:30.360 this will
00:57:31.300 give you
00:57:31.760 let's say
00:57:33.440 a read
00:57:34.040 of the room
00:57:34.680 if you want
00:57:37.100 to know
00:57:37.340 the temperature
00:57:37.960 of the room
00:57:38.840 even understand
00:57:40.920 that most
00:57:41.420 of my twitter
00:57:41.880 followers
00:57:42.300 are leaning
00:57:43.240 right or
00:57:45.000 independent
00:57:45.460 here's what
00:57:47.020 I tweeted
00:57:47.480 and I'll tell
00:57:48.360 you in advance
00:57:48.940 it got a
00:57:49.500 million retweets
00:57:50.460 now
00:57:51.740 I have over
00:57:52.960 900,000
00:57:53.820 followers
00:57:54.500 but to get
00:57:56.160 over a
00:57:57.320 million retweets
00:57:58.360 that doesn't
00:57:59.700 happen a lot
00:58:00.400 you know that
00:58:01.560 right
00:58:01.860 normal retweets
00:58:03.480 for me would
00:58:03.940 be
00:58:04.220 10 to
00:58:05.780 40,000
00:58:06.520 10 to
00:58:08.360 40,000
00:58:08.920 on a pretty
00:58:09.480 solid tweet
00:58:10.180 if you get
00:58:11.520 a million
00:58:12.040 retweets
00:58:13.100 you hit
00:58:14.140 a nerve
00:58:15.080 so this
00:58:16.740 one hit
00:58:17.600 a nerve
00:58:18.120 and it
00:58:19.180 said
00:58:19.540 DEI is
00:58:21.120 essentially a
00:58:21.780 hunting license
00:58:22.620 for democrats
00:58:23.760 to identify
00:58:24.480 and eliminate
00:58:25.220 conservatives
00:58:25.800 from the
00:58:26.460 military
00:58:26.900 government
00:58:27.880 education
00:58:28.600 and the
00:58:29.140 workplace
00:58:29.580 you can
00:58:30.980 prove me
00:58:31.440 wrong
00:58:31.840 with an
00:58:32.320 example
00:58:32.720 of a
00:58:33.400 conservative
00:58:33.980 heading up
00:58:35.280 a DEI
00:58:36.100 department
00:58:36.800 there are
00:58:39.100 no
00:58:39.500 I'll bat
00:58:40.440 I mean
00:58:41.860 I don't
00:58:42.140 know
00:58:42.480 nobody's
00:58:43.520 proven it
00:58:43.940 yet
00:58:44.200 but do
00:58:45.120 you think
00:58:45.340 there's
00:58:45.580 even
00:58:45.820 one
00:58:46.380 white
00:58:47.580 male
00:58:47.960 conservative
00:58:48.540 who would
00:58:49.740 ever be
00:58:50.140 considered
00:58:50.580 to head
00:58:51.100 up a
00:58:51.380 DEI
00:58:51.780 department
00:58:52.260 nope
00:58:54.960 nope
00:58:56.260 now
00:58:57.200 this is
00:58:58.260 nothing
00:58:58.600 but a
00:58:59.040 hunting
00:58:59.280 license
00:58:59.840 which
00:59:01.000 allows
00:59:01.360 democrats
00:59:01.940 to hunt
00:59:02.460 republicans
00:59:04.140 conservatives
00:59:05.060 it's a
00:59:06.880 hunting
00:59:07.180 license
00:59:07.740 it's
00:59:09.240 nothing
00:59:09.600 else
00:59:10.020 and once
00:59:11.820 you hear
00:59:12.140 that it's
00:59:12.600 hard to
00:59:12.860 think of
00:59:13.160 it another
00:59:13.480 way
00:59:13.720 isn't
00:59:13.920 it
00:59:14.560 it's
00:59:15.100 just
00:59:15.420 a
00:59:15.640 license
00:59:16.040 to
00:59:16.300 attack
00:59:16.640 conservatives
00:59:17.240 that's
00:59:17.700 all it
00:59:18.200 is
00:59:18.460 it
00:59:19.640 got me
00:59:20.200 it
00:59:21.740 got me
00:59:22.260 because
00:59:24.020 it was
00:59:24.320 I'm
00:59:25.540 sure it
00:59:25.820 was the
00:59:26.140 DEI
00:59:26.700 entities
00:59:27.660 within
00:59:28.280 the groups
00:59:29.900 that cancelled
00:59:30.360 me
00:59:30.580 of course
00:59:31.000 it was
00:59:31.260 the DEI
00:59:31.780 people
00:59:32.080 that's
00:59:32.980 their job
00:59:33.540 if you
00:59:35.220 get hired
00:59:35.600 to look
00:59:35.940 for ghosts
00:59:36.520 you're
00:59:37.380 going to
00:59:37.480 find some
00:59:37.900 ghosts
00:59:38.280 because that's
00:59:39.400 how you
00:59:39.620 get paid
00:59:40.060 if you get
00:59:40.940 hired to
00:59:41.460 look for
00:59:41.880 racists
00:59:42.580 you're
00:59:43.400 going to
00:59:43.520 find some
00:59:43.920 racists
00:59:44.420 lots of
00:59:45.460 them
00:59:45.680 because that's
00:59:46.560 how you
00:59:46.760 get paid
00:59:47.140 so we've
00:59:48.920 created a
00:59:49.800 system
00:59:50.220 in which
00:59:51.520 we've
00:59:51.820 actually
00:59:52.180 intentionally
00:59:52.860 inserted
00:59:53.420 the thing
00:59:54.600 that will
00:59:54.940 destroy
00:59:55.420 the company
00:59:56.320 which is
00:59:57.680 a change
00:59:58.800 of focus
00:59:59.400 to ridiculous
01:00:00.700 things
01:00:01.300 instead of
01:00:02.580 profitability
01:00:03.160 so
01:00:05.240 I think
01:00:08.300 this
01:00:08.620 issue
01:00:09.560 is the
01:00:10.020 killer
01:00:10.280 issue
01:00:10.720 for the
01:00:11.840 next
01:00:12.100 election
01:00:12.520 I think
01:00:14.280 if a
01:00:15.620 Republican
01:00:16.240 candidate
01:00:16.960 now Vivek
01:00:18.860 has done
01:00:19.160 a great
01:00:19.460 job
01:00:19.740 in speaking
01:00:20.200 out
01:00:20.440 against
01:00:20.760 these
01:00:21.300 corrosive
01:00:22.020 ideas
01:00:22.700 but I
01:00:24.320 think
01:00:24.500 this
01:00:24.720 framing
01:00:25.140 is the
01:00:25.740 strongest
01:00:26.100 I've
01:00:26.580 seen
01:00:26.780 yet
01:00:27.060 that
01:00:27.420 it's
01:00:27.560 a
01:00:27.700 hunting
01:00:27.940 license
01:00:28.500 for
01:00:29.680 Republicans
01:00:30.240 agree
01:00:32.980 because
01:00:33.960 when you
01:00:34.240 hear
01:00:34.420 hunting
01:00:34.680 license
01:00:35.080 that's
01:00:35.440 a whole
01:00:35.900 different
01:00:36.280 feeling
01:00:36.820 than
01:00:37.660 oh we
01:00:38.160 disagree
01:00:38.540 on some
01:00:38.980 things
01:00:39.340 no
01:00:40.420 you're
01:00:41.360 hunting
01:00:41.740 me
01:00:42.080 you're
01:00:43.420 actually
01:00:43.880 stalking
01:00:44.640 me
01:00:44.920 let me
01:00:45.940 ask you
01:00:46.260 this
01:00:46.560 prior to
01:00:47.700 me being
01:00:48.420 cancelled
01:00:49.380 do you
01:00:51.220 think there
01:00:51.660 were any
01:00:52.120 entities
01:00:52.540 that were
01:00:53.120 poised
01:00:54.400 and waiting
01:00:55.560 and watching
01:00:56.360 literally
01:00:57.960 stalking
01:00:58.780 my public
01:01:00.060 activities
01:01:00.680 to look
01:01:01.960 for the
01:01:02.340 little
01:01:02.640 opportunity
01:01:03.720 to jump
01:01:04.360 in
01:01:04.560 yes
01:01:05.280 they were
01:01:07.040 not
01:01:07.320 ignoring
01:01:07.860 me
01:01:08.300 until
01:01:09.120 I
01:01:09.340 did
01:01:09.500 something
01:01:09.860 wrong
01:01:10.260 they
01:01:11.060 were
01:01:11.260 hunting
01:01:11.680 they
01:01:13.260 were
01:01:13.440 hunting
01:01:13.800 do you
01:01:15.360 think
01:01:15.560 any
01:01:15.780 of the
01:01:16.060 other
01:01:16.240 big
01:01:16.520 accounts
01:01:17.020 that
01:01:17.380 might
01:01:17.560 be
01:01:17.880 pro
01:01:18.780 Republican
01:01:19.280 in some
01:01:19.740 way
01:01:19.940 do you
01:01:20.580 think
01:01:20.740 any
01:01:20.940 of them
01:01:21.180 else
01:01:21.380 are
01:01:21.500 being
01:01:21.660 watched
01:01:21.980 carefully
01:01:22.460 well
01:01:24.200 yeah
01:01:24.500 because
01:01:25.840 they're
01:01:26.020 looking
01:01:26.240 to get
01:01:26.560 rid
01:01:26.740 of
01:01:26.860 your
01:01:27.020 Matt
01:01:27.320 Walsh's
01:01:27.980 and
01:01:28.140 your
01:01:28.320 everybody
01:01:29.120 else's
01:01:29.680 you
01:01:30.260 know
01:01:30.440 a lot
01:01:31.360 of them
01:01:31.600 are
01:01:31.820 safe
01:01:32.420 because
01:01:32.780 they're
01:01:33.000 in
01:01:33.240 entities
01:01:33.640 that are
01:01:34.100 going to
01:01:34.340 protect
01:01:34.580 them
01:01:34.880 but yeah
01:01:36.160 they're
01:01:36.540 all
01:01:36.800 being
01:01:37.000 watched
01:01:37.400 now the
01:01:38.240 thing that
01:01:38.580 I had
01:01:38.900 that made
01:01:39.280 me
01:01:39.580 unsafe
01:01:40.600 was exactly
01:01:41.940 the thing
01:01:42.340 that I thought
01:01:42.740 made me
01:01:43.140 safe
01:01:43.420 so I had
01:01:43.800 that completely
01:01:44.380 wrong
01:01:44.740 I thought
01:01:45.600 having
01:01:46.060 thousands
01:01:47.220 of clients
01:01:48.120 would make
01:01:49.560 me safe
01:01:50.080 because even
01:01:50.520 if a few
01:01:50.960 got mad
01:01:51.480 I'd still
01:01:51.820 have thousands
01:01:52.400 but I didn't
01:01:54.360 understand that
01:01:55.060 I'd have
01:01:55.380 choke points
01:01:56.020 and that the
01:01:57.000 DEI people
01:01:57.680 could go after
01:01:58.220 the choke point
01:01:58.900 the publisher
01:01:59.860 and just
01:02:00.740 turn it
01:02:01.060 all off
01:02:01.540 but if I
01:02:03.160 had worked
01:02:03.560 for let's
01:02:04.060 say the
01:02:04.560 Daily Wire
01:02:05.460 or the
01:02:05.900 Blaze or
01:02:06.800 something
01:02:07.080 and a whole
01:02:08.000 bunch of
01:02:08.420 Democrats
01:02:08.860 didn't like
01:02:09.420 me
01:02:09.660 well
01:02:10.460 so what
01:02:12.060 it wouldn't
01:02:13.180 make any
01:02:13.540 difference at
01:02:13.980 all
01:02:14.200 I would
01:02:14.940 still have
01:02:15.260 my job
01:02:15.760 and the
01:02:16.120 people who
01:02:16.520 paid me
01:02:16.900 would be
01:02:17.260 happy the
01:02:17.780 Democrats
01:02:18.240 didn't like
01:02:18.700 me
01:02:18.940 so I was
01:02:20.820 way more
01:02:21.560 vulnerable
01:02:22.060 than I
01:02:22.500 thought
01:02:22.820 but now
01:02:24.060 I've moved
01:02:24.540 my business
01:02:25.640 into a
01:02:26.300 subscription
01:02:26.800 model
01:02:27.300 so that I
01:02:28.680 can protect
01:02:29.180 myself
01:02:29.580 and by
01:02:31.700 the way
01:02:31.900 the value
01:02:32.900 of the
01:02:33.460 Locals
01:02:33.920 platform
01:02:34.460 and Rumble
01:02:35.600 that bought
01:02:36.200 Locals
01:02:36.580 or merged
01:02:37.620 with it
01:02:37.940 the value
01:02:38.940 of the
01:02:39.240 Locals
01:02:39.560 platform
01:02:40.060 to free
01:02:40.600 speech
01:02:40.980 is just
01:02:42.240 incalculable
01:02:43.200 you literally
01:02:44.680 can get
01:02:45.180 cancelled
01:02:45.560 and then
01:02:46.020 still have
01:02:46.440 a life
01:02:47.420 after
01:02:47.780 cancellation
01:02:48.220 and I'm
01:02:49.400 not sure
01:02:49.720 that was
01:02:50.020 true when
01:02:50.640 Roseanne
01:02:51.240 got cancelled
01:02:51.880 remember
01:02:53.000 when Roseanne
01:02:53.640 got cancelled
01:02:54.200 where did
01:02:54.620 she go
01:02:55.040 nowhere
01:02:56.380 nowhere
01:02:57.820 because there
01:02:58.880 was no
01:02:59.340 place to
01:02:59.840 go
01:03:00.120 she was
01:03:01.500 just out
01:03:01.820 of business
01:03:02.240 now she's
01:03:02.840 back
01:03:03.220 but if
01:03:04.980 she had
01:03:05.640 done that
01:03:06.060 when
01:03:06.420 maybe she's
01:03:07.540 not the
01:03:07.860 ideal person
01:03:08.680 to be on
01:03:09.000 Locals
01:03:09.400 maybe she
01:03:10.040 is
01:03:10.220 but you
01:03:11.180 can imagine
01:03:11.680 she could
01:03:12.160 have
01:03:12.480 just
01:03:13.200 recreated
01:03:14.560 a different
01:03:15.500 base of
01:03:15.960 popularity
01:03:16.460 with different
01:03:17.060 tools
01:03:17.460 Robert
01:03:24.980 says
01:03:25.420 hunting
01:03:25.800 is a
01:03:26.180 more
01:03:26.320 conservative
01:03:26.860 meme
01:03:27.340 and you're
01:03:27.960 digging
01:03:28.180 yourself
01:03:28.580 further
01:03:28.900 into
01:03:29.200 extremism
01:03:29.920 and
01:03:30.680 marginalization
01:03:31.640 than
01:03:31.940 necessary
01:03:32.460 I like
01:03:34.840 that comment
01:03:35.440 I like
01:03:36.660 that comment
01:03:37.260 but let
01:03:38.120 me tell
01:03:38.380 you that
01:03:38.860 I'm
01:03:40.240 surfing
01:03:40.680 the sun
01:03:41.120 intentionally
01:03:41.800 good advice
01:03:45.680 would be
01:03:46.140 hey
01:03:46.500 stay away
01:03:47.540 from the
01:03:47.840 sun
01:03:48.060 you'll
01:03:48.280 get
01:03:48.440 burned
01:03:48.800 I know
01:03:50.080 that
01:03:50.400 I know
01:03:50.880 it's
01:03:51.060 safer
01:03:51.340 I don't
01:03:52.500 want to
01:03:52.720 be safe
01:03:53.240 I'm not
01:03:54.940 attempting
01:03:55.300 to keep
01:03:55.720 myself
01:03:56.080 safe
01:03:56.460 I'm trying
01:03:57.820 to make
01:03:58.180 a point
01:03:58.620 because I
01:03:59.140 think it's
01:03:59.460 important
01:03:59.940 I think it's
01:04:00.800 important for
01:04:01.280 our survival
01:04:01.940 actually our
01:04:03.400 survival
01:04:03.800 we have to
01:04:05.240 get this
01:04:05.560 stuff right
01:04:06.100 and it's
01:04:06.940 very wrong
01:04:07.800 right now
01:04:08.320 we've got to
01:04:09.480 figure some
01:04:10.060 way not to
01:04:11.260 hate each
01:04:11.680 other over
01:04:12.320 politics
01:04:13.000 and DEI
01:04:14.420 stuff and
01:04:15.020 bullshit
01:04:15.340 and not
01:04:16.540 take our
01:04:16.980 eyes off
01:04:17.700 the
01:04:17.980 profitability
01:04:19.120 and the
01:04:19.800 well-being
01:04:20.180 of the
01:04:20.480 country
01:04:20.760 so yes
01:04:23.060 calling it
01:04:23.840 haunting
01:04:24.220 is
01:04:25.980 let's say
01:04:28.100 it's evocative
01:04:28.960 of or
01:04:29.660 reminds you
01:04:30.420 of
01:04:30.800 extremism
01:04:32.420 and then
01:04:33.840 it got your
01:04:34.280 attention
01:04:34.680 didn't it
01:04:35.260 did it get
01:04:36.480 your attention
01:04:37.000 it got your
01:04:39.220 attention enough
01:04:39.880 to make a
01:04:40.900 comment saying
01:04:41.600 it was
01:04:41.820 dangerous
01:04:42.300 so if I
01:04:44.040 got your
01:04:44.420 attention
01:04:44.820 that's all
01:04:45.780 I want
01:04:46.180 I don't
01:04:46.960 want your
01:04:47.320 safety
01:04:47.700 I don't
01:04:48.760 want your
01:04:49.100 protection
01:04:49.620 I don't
01:04:51.520 don't need
01:04:52.040 it
01:04:52.240 I only want
01:04:53.980 you to pay
01:04:54.320 attention
01:04:54.780 there you go
01:04:57.540 all right
01:04:59.020 I don't think
01:05:01.120 that the
01:05:01.560 attacks on
01:05:02.140 DEI
01:05:02.780 where we
01:05:03.780 cleverly
01:05:04.460 change the
01:05:05.340 letters to
01:05:05.960 D-I-E
01:05:07.160 I get
01:05:08.540 it
01:05:08.740 it's clever
01:05:09.300 but there's
01:05:10.680 no persuasive
01:05:11.480 punch to
01:05:12.200 that
01:05:12.480 it's just
01:05:13.200 sort of an
01:05:13.840 interesting thing
01:05:14.520 that's all
01:05:15.040 all right
01:05:21.500 haunted us in
01:05:25.000 Las Vegas
01:05:25.740 you got
01:05:27.020 hunted in
01:05:27.500 Las Vegas
01:05:27.940 now
01:05:35.040 am I
01:05:37.240 dangerous
01:05:37.820 just
01:05:41.040 just
01:05:41.400 occurred to
01:05:42.000 me to ask
01:05:42.440 that
01:05:42.660 I've seen
01:05:48.000 a lot of
01:05:48.360 yeses
01:05:48.720 a few
01:05:49.020 noes
01:05:49.420 the
01:05:50.940 locals
01:05:51.420 people are
01:05:51.880 more likely
01:05:52.300 to say
01:05:52.580 yes
01:05:52.860 they've
01:05:53.920 seen more
01:05:54.360 of my
01:05:54.760 toolbox
01:05:56.000 oh this
01:05:57.340 is interesting
01:05:57.800 there's quite
01:05:58.280 a split
01:05:58.740 YouTube is
01:05:59.860 almost all
01:06:00.740 noes
01:06:01.240 that I'm
01:06:01.900 not
01:06:02.080 dangerous
01:06:02.500 with some
01:06:02.900 yeses
01:06:03.300 and locals
01:06:04.940 is mostly
01:06:05.800 yes with a
01:06:06.460 few noes
01:06:06.980 that's quite
01:06:07.720 a difference
01:06:08.220 interesting
01:06:10.420 well I'm
01:06:14.220 dangerous to
01:06:14.800 some things
01:06:15.360 I'm sure
01:06:17.260 I'm dangerous
01:06:17.760 to some
01:06:18.100 things
01:06:18.300 all right
01:06:18.800 let me ask
01:06:19.420 you another
01:06:19.880 narcissistic
01:06:21.280 question
01:06:21.680 so this is
01:06:23.560 purely narcissistic
01:06:24.900 if you'd like
01:06:25.400 to see it that
01:06:25.900 way
01:06:26.100 but I kind
01:06:27.940 of need to
01:06:28.440 know
01:06:28.760 like I
01:06:29.920 actually need
01:06:30.440 to know
01:06:30.740 this
01:06:31.080 am I in
01:06:34.980 the top
01:06:35.520 20%
01:06:36.460 of people
01:06:37.540 influencing
01:06:38.080 politics
01:06:38.680 no not
01:06:39.260 top 20%
01:06:39.980 top 20
01:06:40.840 people
01:06:41.240 top 20
01:06:42.980 individuals
01:06:43.940 all right
01:06:46.800 locals
01:06:47.740 we got some
01:06:48.260 yeses and
01:06:48.740 noes
01:06:49.140 more yeses
01:06:50.140 than noes
01:06:50.660 on YouTube
01:06:52.800 lots of
01:06:54.940 yeses but
01:06:55.480 lots of
01:06:55.860 noes
01:06:56.260 pretty mixed
01:06:57.340 now the
01:06:59.480 people who
01:06:59.860 say no
01:07:00.420 what
01:07:02.520 what do
01:07:02.880 you
01:07:03.020 all right
01:07:04.980 I got to
01:07:05.340 call out
01:07:05.660 the idiot
01:07:06.100 the NPC
01:07:07.400 all right
01:07:07.980 somebody named
01:07:08.540 decadence
01:07:09.180 their comment
01:07:11.020 in all
01:07:11.520 capital letters
01:07:12.320 is arrogant
01:07:13.920 arrogant
01:07:15.320 oh
01:07:16.700 oh
01:07:17.540 arrogant
01:07:18.400 now you
01:07:19.940 fucking
01:07:20.280 idiot
01:07:20.640 I started
01:07:21.900 this by
01:07:22.320 saying it's
01:07:22.880 narcissistic
01:07:23.760 but it also
01:07:25.100 has some
01:07:25.580 utility
01:07:26.040 that is
01:07:28.120 just clearly
01:07:28.920 an NPC
01:07:29.680 you couldn't
01:07:30.820 possibly be
01:07:31.820 a real
01:07:32.420 functioning
01:07:32.960 human with
01:07:33.940 a fucking
01:07:34.440 brain
01:07:34.940 that you
01:07:36.220 thought
01:07:36.540 shouting that
01:07:37.300 in all
01:07:37.600 caps was
01:07:38.160 additive
01:07:38.600 or what
01:07:39.880 entertaining
01:07:40.660 like do
01:07:42.240 your fingers
01:07:42.720 just move
01:07:43.500 like
01:07:43.920 just
01:07:46.240 automatically
01:07:46.840 or something
01:07:47.440 my god
01:07:49.840 oh my god
01:07:53.340 now the
01:07:57.640 thing that
01:07:57.980 bothers me
01:07:58.500 is the
01:07:58.880 boredom
01:07:59.280 of it
01:07:59.680 I don't
01:08:00.900 know if
01:08:01.120 that's
01:08:01.320 coming
01:08:01.540 through
01:08:01.820 the
01:08:02.420 sheer
01:08:03.180 lack
01:08:04.140 of
01:08:04.360 creativity
01:08:04.940 actually
01:08:05.580 just
01:08:05.880 hurts
01:08:06.360 me
01:08:06.580 it's
01:08:06.700 like
01:08:06.880 oh
01:08:07.680 like
01:08:08.760 do
01:08:10.000 something
01:08:10.600 different
01:08:11.080 than
01:08:11.360 that
01:08:11.720 anything
01:08:12.960 just
01:08:13.740 anything
01:08:14.520 different
01:08:14.960 than
01:08:15.260 all
01:08:15.620 caps
01:08:16.040 agreeing
01:08:17.180 with
01:08:17.440 me
01:08:17.620 like
01:08:17.900 you're
01:08:18.160 disagreeing
01:08:18.960 arrogant
01:08:19.880 whoa
01:08:20.760 whoa
01:08:20.980 arrogant
01:08:21.440 oh
01:08:22.400 god
01:08:23.720 you're so
01:08:24.080 predictable
01:08:24.500 anyway
01:08:25.920 all right
01:08:28.040 so my
01:08:28.700 view is
01:08:29.180 that
01:08:29.360 anybody
01:08:29.680 who's
01:08:29.960 in the
01:08:30.200 top
01:08:30.420 20
01:08:30.820 people
01:08:31.360 who
01:08:31.760 influence
01:08:32.380 politics
01:08:32.920 is going
01:08:33.720 to be
01:08:33.920 targeted
01:08:34.300 for removal
01:08:35.160 either by
01:08:36.260 the left
01:08:36.640 or the
01:08:36.900 right
01:08:37.180 so everybody
01:08:38.140 who's in
01:08:38.540 that
01:08:38.920 top 20
01:08:40.500 influencer
01:08:41.060 group
01:08:41.480 by the
01:08:42.420 way
01:08:42.640 you did
01:08:43.860 see that
01:08:44.220 Mike
01:08:44.440 Cernovich
01:08:44.800 is almost
01:08:45.920 certainly
01:08:46.420 the reason
01:08:47.580 that DeSantis
01:08:48.220 made the
01:08:49.040 statement
01:08:49.480 he did
01:08:49.900 that didn't
01:08:51.140 mention
01:08:51.440 Trump
01:08:51.800 but it
01:08:52.120 was about
01:08:52.540 D.A.
01:08:53.720 Bragg
01:08:54.060 that was
01:08:55.640 entirely
01:08:56.240 in my
01:08:56.920 opinion
01:08:57.280 and I
01:08:58.100 think
01:08:58.380 Mike
01:08:59.000 Cernovich's
01:08:59.620 opinion
01:08:59.900 as well
01:09:00.340 that was
01:09:01.480 entirely
01:09:01.860 one person
01:09:02.620 and that
01:09:05.300 mattered
01:09:05.840 like that
01:09:07.320 that was
01:09:07.840 a moment
01:09:09.040 that the
01:09:09.580 whole
01:09:09.940 least the
01:09:10.600 right
01:09:10.860 was watching
01:09:11.500 the whole
01:09:12.000 world
01:09:12.280 really
01:09:12.520 that was
01:09:13.580 an important
01:09:14.440 framing
01:09:16.160 moment
01:09:17.100 and he
01:09:18.180 made that
01:09:18.600 happen
01:09:18.940 one person
01:09:20.080 so is
01:09:20.940 Mike
01:09:21.180 Cernovich
01:09:21.580 in the
01:09:22.100 top 20
01:09:22.840 people
01:09:23.180 who can
01:09:23.560 change
01:09:25.020 politics
01:09:25.600 oh yeah
01:09:27.360 yeah
01:09:29.360 he might
01:09:31.100 be in the
01:09:31.420 top three
01:09:32.060 he might
01:09:33.980 be in the
01:09:34.240 top one
01:09:34.840 you know
01:09:36.540 depending on
01:09:37.040 what the
01:09:37.320 topic is
01:09:37.900 and of
01:09:38.900 course
01:09:39.160 you know
01:09:39.760 some people
01:09:40.180 are more
01:09:40.480 influential
01:09:40.920 on some
01:09:41.380 topics
01:09:41.840 than others
01:09:42.360 but yeah
01:09:43.460 yeah
01:09:44.600 I mean
01:09:45.140 top 20
01:09:45.740 easily
01:09:46.240 top five
01:09:47.860 I would
01:09:48.220 argue
01:09:48.580 and if it
01:09:50.760 was top
01:09:51.360 two or
01:09:51.840 three
01:09:52.140 I wouldn't
01:09:52.520 even be
01:09:52.860 surprised
01:09:53.440 at all
01:09:54.480 all right
01:09:57.180 who else
01:10:01.440 is in that
01:10:01.960 category
01:10:02.400 of people
01:10:03.200 who are
01:10:03.400 not just
01:10:03.820 entertaining
01:10:04.320 but influential
01:10:06.540 that actually
01:10:07.900 like a
01:10:08.440 policy will
01:10:09.040 change
01:10:09.380 because of
01:10:10.580 something
01:10:10.900 Musk of
01:10:11.880 course
01:10:12.240 Tucker of
01:10:13.320 course
01:10:13.720 Steve Bannon
01:10:14.900 probably
01:10:15.980 Pasabek
01:10:18.000 probably
01:10:18.520 Russell Brand
01:10:19.840 I haven't
01:10:20.220 seen it yet
01:10:20.720 Gad Saad
01:10:21.400 I think he's
01:10:21.980 actually influenced
01:10:22.740 politics
01:10:23.240 I believe
01:10:24.140 Gad Saad
01:10:24.740 is another
01:10:25.140 one
01:10:25.420 yeah
01:10:25.760 you know
01:10:28.800 I haven't
01:10:29.280 seen Bill
01:10:29.700 Maher
01:10:30.080 influence
01:10:30.760 politics
01:10:31.400 I've seen
01:10:32.560 him say
01:10:32.880 things I
01:10:33.320 like
01:10:33.760 but I
01:10:34.840 haven't
01:10:35.020 seen it
01:10:35.320 change
01:10:35.700 much
01:10:36.140 yeah
01:10:36.840 Elon Musk
01:10:37.500 for sure
01:10:37.940 Jordan
01:10:38.300 Peterson
01:10:38.720 I don't
01:10:40.720 know
01:10:41.020 Jordan
01:10:41.720 Peterson
01:10:42.060 is
01:10:42.460 insanely
01:10:43.580 influential
01:10:45.160 on a
01:10:47.060 personal
01:10:47.460 development
01:10:48.100 kind of
01:10:48.980 way
01:10:49.100 but
01:10:49.300 politics
01:10:49.840 maybe
01:10:51.340 Bongino
01:10:53.220 David
01:10:54.960 Sachs
01:10:55.580 that's a
01:10:56.560 perfect
01:10:56.840 example
01:10:57.340 David
01:10:57.640 Sachs
01:10:58.280 yeah
01:10:59.000 Matt
01:10:59.280 Walsh
01:10:59.900 Joe
01:11:01.380 Rogan
01:11:01.820 Jonathan
01:11:02.920 Turley
01:11:03.420 Matt
01:11:04.700 Taibbi
01:11:05.160 now
01:11:05.580 Michael
01:11:06.340 Schellenberger
01:11:06.920 Michael
01:11:07.800 Schellenberger
01:11:08.340 is moving
01:11:08.820 the needle
01:11:09.240 a lot
01:11:09.840 yeah
01:11:11.120 I mean
01:11:11.500 I would
01:11:12.440 say
01:11:12.640 outside of
01:11:13.220 politics
01:11:13.780 yeah
01:11:14.420 so
01:11:14.660 Trump
01:11:15.380 and
01:11:15.660 you know
01:11:16.820 other people
01:11:17.480 are influential
01:11:18.200 in politics
01:11:18.900 Andrew Tate
01:11:20.320 less so
01:11:21.580 for American
01:11:22.120 politics
01:11:22.740 I don't
01:11:23.360 think
01:11:23.540 Andrew Tate
01:11:24.000 is
01:11:24.240 moving
01:11:25.420 the
01:11:25.740 bar
01:11:26.200 in
01:11:26.340 America
01:11:26.720 politics
01:11:28.600 Cory
01:11:30.340 DeAngelis
01:11:31.040 good
01:11:31.760 name
01:11:32.060 yes
01:11:32.400 Cory
01:11:32.760 DeAngelis
01:11:33.360 is
01:11:33.760 single-handedly
01:11:35.720 the
01:11:36.340 biggest
01:11:37.120 oh
01:11:38.220 yeah
01:11:39.540 James O'Keefe
01:11:40.320 it's a
01:11:41.660 sort of a
01:11:42.040 special case
01:11:42.640 but yes
01:11:43.160 Miranda
01:11:44.620 Divine
01:11:45.140 oh yeah
01:11:46.900 Ruffo
01:11:47.640 Ruffo
01:11:48.200 I don't
01:11:51.400 know about
01:11:52.060 Alex Jones
01:11:52.720 just because
01:11:55.000 I don't
01:11:55.740 follow the
01:11:56.300 show as
01:11:56.700 much
01:11:57.040 Mr. Beast
01:11:58.120 I don't
01:11:58.420 think so
01:11:58.900 Tom Fitton
01:12:02.120 well
01:12:05.200 I guess
01:12:06.800 I need
01:12:07.100 an example
01:12:07.600 of that
01:12:08.080 that could
01:12:09.540 he might
01:12:10.340 be changing
01:12:10.820 politics
01:12:11.380 alright
01:12:13.220 so
01:12:15.180 and yeah
01:12:16.360 Godfeld
01:12:16.780 of course
01:12:17.360 so
01:12:18.600 yeah
01:12:20.900 if
01:12:21.180 if you
01:12:22.180 if you
01:12:23.240 don't count
01:12:23.740 people who
01:12:24.320 are TV
01:12:25.080 hosts
01:12:26.360 or elected
01:12:27.720 politicians
01:12:28.360 or running
01:12:29.760 to be elected
01:12:30.380 there aren't
01:12:33.060 that many
01:12:33.420 people who
01:12:33.900 are moving
01:12:34.380 moving the
01:12:35.260 needle
01:12:35.520 who don't
01:12:36.940 have that
01:12:37.400 job
01:12:37.860 well I
01:12:38.320 suppose I
01:12:38.720 have that
01:12:39.040 job
01:12:39.360 in my
01:12:39.940 own way
01:12:40.440 Candace
01:12:42.480 Megan
01:12:42.780 Kelly
01:12:43.200 Sonny
01:12:45.000 Johnson
01:12:45.380 alright
01:12:45.960 seeing a lot
01:12:46.480 of names
01:12:46.800 but would
01:12:47.540 but would
01:12:47.980 you agree
01:12:48.420 that at
01:12:48.860 least
01:12:49.160 where it
01:12:50.960 concerns
01:12:51.600 Republican
01:12:53.400 related
01:12:54.080 stuff
01:12:55.120 would you
01:12:56.640 agree that
01:12:57.080 there are
01:12:57.320 about 20
01:12:58.040 people
01:12:58.460 who are
01:12:58.960 the one
01:12:59.260 Tim Pool
01:12:59.800 would you
01:13:00.640 agree there
01:13:00.960 are about
01:13:01.240 20 people
01:13:01.920 who make
01:13:02.300 a difference
01:13:02.780 and that
01:13:04.280 if the 20
01:13:04.840 who make
01:13:05.180 a difference
01:13:05.640 probably the
01:13:06.300 top 10
01:13:06.940 are 80%
01:13:09.140 of the
01:13:09.360 difference
01:13:09.720 yeah
01:13:11.660 top 10
01:13:12.180 are probably
01:13:12.500 80%
01:13:13.060 and top 20
01:13:13.780 are probably
01:13:14.660 all of it
01:13:15.340 probably just
01:13:16.760 about all
01:13:17.200 of it
01:13:17.520 oh yeah
01:13:18.280 Victor David
01:13:18.900 Hanson
01:13:19.260 good name
01:13:19.960 yeah
01:13:20.580 but you know
01:13:21.920 some of those
01:13:22.420 people are
01:13:22.860 famous
01:13:23.440 but not
01:13:24.780 influential
01:13:25.360 you know
01:13:28.300 what I mean
01:13:28.700 let
01:13:29.960 let
01:13:30.900 and I'll
01:13:31.540 use Victor
01:13:32.100 David Hanson
01:13:32.780 as an
01:13:33.360 example
01:13:33.720 I don't
01:13:34.320 know if
01:13:34.940 he's
01:13:35.140 influential
01:13:35.640 I know
01:13:37.060 he adds
01:13:37.660 a lot
01:13:37.940 to
01:13:38.120 conversations
01:13:38.820 like I
01:13:40.000 know that
01:13:40.480 if he
01:13:40.700 listened to
01:13:41.260 Victor David
01:13:41.780 Hanson
01:13:42.160 your understanding
01:13:43.460 of context
01:13:44.200 will be
01:13:44.720 improved
01:13:45.220 immediately
01:13:45.740 that might
01:13:47.460 change your
01:13:47.880 mind
01:13:48.080 about something
01:13:48.820 but he
01:13:49.740 but here's
01:13:50.400 why I'm
01:13:50.900 questioning
01:13:51.340 his influence
01:13:52.160 he pretty
01:13:54.140 much
01:13:54.520 is
01:13:55.100 right on
01:13:58.380 the
01:13:58.880 Republican
01:14:00.060 conservative
01:14:00.880 narrative
01:14:02.760 am I
01:14:04.060 wrong
01:14:04.340 so he
01:14:06.000 may be
01:14:06.880 adding
01:14:08.460 context
01:14:09.120 to help
01:14:09.580 people
01:14:10.040 to help
01:14:11.720 people
01:14:12.080 maybe
01:14:12.420 strengthen
01:14:12.980 their
01:14:13.260 arguments
01:14:13.740 and that's
01:14:15.620 valuable too
01:14:16.280 maybe that's
01:14:17.660 a form of
01:14:18.400 influence
01:14:18.880 but
01:14:20.140 the reason
01:14:22.620 somebody like
01:14:23.180 a Cernovich
01:14:23.780 has extra
01:14:24.840 juice
01:14:25.340 well there's
01:14:26.680 lots of
01:14:27.000 reasons he
01:14:27.400 has extra
01:14:27.840 juice
01:14:28.180 I mean
01:14:28.540 he's a
01:14:29.540 singular
01:14:29.920 personality
01:14:30.600 you can't
01:14:31.140 reproduce
01:14:31.440 him
01:14:31.720 and he
01:14:32.760 has
01:14:32.940 special
01:14:33.680 talents
01:14:34.160 but the
01:14:37.420 fact that
01:14:37.760 he's an
01:14:38.060 independent
01:14:38.500 and you
01:14:39.680 don't actually
01:14:40.360 know where
01:14:40.760 he's going
01:14:41.100 to come
01:14:41.360 out on
01:14:41.740 anything
01:14:42.180 have you
01:14:43.680 noticed
01:14:43.940 that
01:14:44.240 with
01:14:45.340 Cernovich
01:14:45.820 you never
01:14:46.300 really know
01:14:47.020 it could
01:14:49.360 sort of
01:14:49.700 go any
01:14:50.060 way
01:14:50.340 and his
01:14:51.740 unpredictability
01:14:52.660 is a big
01:14:53.600 part of his
01:14:54.080 appeal
01:14:54.360 so that's
01:14:55.440 more
01:14:55.660 persuasive
01:14:56.900 because when
01:14:58.200 he takes
01:14:58.600 what looks
01:14:59.740 to you
01:15:00.100 like a
01:15:00.520 contrarian
01:15:01.020 opinion
01:15:01.380 you stop
01:15:02.500 immediately
01:15:02.980 you go
01:15:04.080 oh
01:15:04.380 what's
01:15:05.200 this
01:15:05.460 what's
01:15:06.380 this
01:15:06.540 contrarian
01:15:07.100 opinion
01:15:07.380 I gotta
01:15:07.760 listen to
01:15:08.520 this
01:15:08.780 yeah so
01:15:10.160 he does
01:15:10.460 have
01:15:10.640 powers
01:15:11.020 that you
01:15:11.320 don't
01:15:11.460 have
01:15:11.820 how would
01:15:18.620 anyone know
01:15:19.060 the answer
01:15:19.560 yeah
01:15:19.960 Gordon Chang
01:15:25.220 yeah Gordon
01:15:26.760 Chang
01:15:27.220 has been
01:15:29.580 a consistent
01:15:30.420 China hawk
01:15:32.620 and yeah
01:15:34.160 he probably
01:15:34.520 has made
01:15:34.840 a difference
01:15:35.180 I think
01:15:35.480 you're right
01:15:35.780 and specifically
01:15:37.040 on one
01:15:37.740 topic
01:15:38.080 now some
01:15:38.820 people are
01:15:39.180 more influential
01:15:39.880 on some
01:15:40.400 topics than
01:15:41.180 others
01:15:41.540 right
01:15:43.160 so
01:15:44.060 yeah
01:15:47.740 all right
01:15:48.200 so that's
01:15:49.040 and PragerU
01:15:50.000 is influential
01:15:51.040 too
01:15:51.380 yes
01:15:51.760 all right
01:15:52.740 that's all
01:15:53.160 I got
01:15:53.340 for today
01:15:53.700 I'm gonna
01:15:53.980 say bye
01:15:54.440 to the
01:15:54.920 YouTube
01:15:55.260 people
01:15:55.680 it looked
01:15:56.420 like my
01:15:56.900 clever
01:15:57.340 Twitter
01:15:57.860 tweeting
01:15:58.520 tricks
01:15:58.900 didn't work
01:15:59.540 at all
01:15:59.860 looks like
01:16:00.480 the same
01:16:00.840 same size
01:16:02.020 crowd as
01:16:02.440 every day
01:16:02.780 so
01:16:03.920 I guess
01:16:05.020 now I
01:16:05.360 have a
01:16:05.600 question
01:16:05.880 whether
01:16:06.160 those
01:16:06.620 Twitter
01:16:08.200 algorithm
01:16:08.860 tricks
01:16:09.240 are real
01:16:09.680 because it
01:16:10.860 looks like
01:16:11.260 I just
01:16:11.560 tested it
01:16:12.160 it didn't
01:16:12.440 make any
01:16:12.820 difference
01:16:13.200 but
01:16:14.300 let's find
01:16:15.320 out
01:16:15.520 I won't
01:16:16.800 really see
01:16:17.220 the number
01:16:17.660 until I
01:16:18.380 quit you
01:16:19.160 on YouTube
01:16:19.580 and then
01:16:20.000 I'll tell
01:16:20.280 the locals
01:16:20.980 people what
01:16:21.460 it looked
01:16:21.700 like
01:16:22.020 bye for
01:16:23.360 now YouTube
01:16:23.760 thanks for
01:16:24.300 joining
01:16:24.540 best life