Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2069 Scott Adams： Trump Arraignment, AI Rewrites History More Woke, Escape Cities

00:00:00.120 Civilization, it's called Coffee with Scott Adams, today with better lighting, maybe a

00:00:05.640 little too bright, we'll fix that later, but if you'd like to take your experience up to

00:00:12.080 levels that have never been known before, an enjoyment which you could only imagine until

00:00:17.860 now, all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass.

00:00:22.060 So I lost my little cheat note of what I say before the show, but that's okay because

00:00:34.700 it's written on my mug, except the first word is missing on my mug, and I don't remember

00:00:42.340 what it was, probably a cup or a mug or a flask, a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or

00:00:55.260 a cellist or a stein, a canteen jug or a flask if that's of any kind, man, when you lose

00:01:04.140 it in the first second of a live stream, it will never come back, let me tell you something

00:01:10.720 about presentations, the first minute decides how the entire thing goes.

00:01:16.560 Like if the first minute goes really well, everything goes well after that, but when

00:01:21.740 it goes this way instead, there's not a chance that this will be good.

00:01:27.280 We're off to the wrong foot, but still, we're going to have the simultaneous sip, and we're

00:01:33.160 going to try to recover from here, because do we quit?

00:01:35.900 No, we do not quit.

00:01:38.540 We push forward.

00:01:40.680 Go.

00:01:44.680 I can't believe I picked the one mug out of my cupboard that had the missing words.

00:01:52.000 Oh, no.

00:01:53.800 Well, how many of you watched the Trump arraignment?

00:01:58.940 We'll talk about that.

00:02:00.140 I'm going to do a few short stories before that, because people pour in.

00:02:05.400 They'll be pouring in to get my comments on this.

00:02:09.520 Well, the funniest thing that happened, I guess yesterday, was that Twitter labeled NPR,

00:02:16.000 state-affiliated media, on Twitter.

00:02:18.580 So, Twitter likes to tag any propaganda sites from other countries.

00:02:26.540 So, if there's a Chinese state-affiliated person, they'll put that right in the bio so

00:02:31.400 you can't miss it.

00:02:33.340 So, something like RT Russia Today might have that little warning.

00:02:39.080 Well, Musk started putting that, or Twitter did, started putting that on NPR, state-affiliated

00:02:46.980 media.

00:02:47.360 In other words, you're supposed to not believe their news.

00:02:52.300 Twitter actually has a permanent label on NPR that it's not to be believed.

00:03:01.280 What do you say about that?

00:03:03.980 And then, of course, he got some pushback, and Musk just took the definition of state-supported

00:03:12.360 media and published it and said, that looks about right.

00:03:15.280 Now, there was some pushback.

00:03:19.460 Somebody said that only 2% of NPR's funding comes from the government.

00:03:24.660 Does that sound right to you?

00:03:26.960 Does it sound like only 2% of their funding comes from the government?

00:03:31.360 No, that sounds like a lie, doesn't it?

00:03:33.100 I mean, it's something I saw on Twitter, but it looked like somebody who knew what they

00:03:38.260 were talking about, but it can't be real, could it?

00:03:40.980 If it were 2%, it probably would have gone to zero.

00:03:44.260 That's my theory.

00:03:45.120 If it ever got down to 2%, probably the public would have said, wouldn't it be better at

00:03:51.340 zero?

00:03:52.120 I mean, is that 2% really making all the difference?

00:03:55.280 Wouldn't it be better for the government just to be out of that business?

00:03:59.020 Yeah.

00:03:59.300 I've got a feeling it's more than 2%.

00:04:01.020 Oh, somebody says 100% of the news.

00:04:06.240 I don't know about that, but that's a claim I'm seeing there.

00:04:10.580 Well, I just think it's hilarious.

00:04:12.560 It may be a little overstated, but not much.

00:04:15.520 It makes me wonder, why would NBC not be considered state-affiliated media?

00:04:23.240 It's not just because they're funded, right?

00:04:28.820 Isn't NBC the one that Glenn Greenwald always says the CIA basically controls them?

00:04:38.520 Or at least controls some stories that they publish.

00:04:43.480 Wouldn't it be perfectly accurate for Twitter to call NBC a state-affiliated media?

00:04:51.460 Or MSNBC?

00:04:53.240 I don't know.

00:04:55.100 Well, I guess you'd have to prove it, so that might be the problem.

00:04:59.120 Babylon Bee had, as it often does, the best comment on everything.

00:05:05.280 You know, we keep talking about kids being sexualized by all the trans-related information

00:05:13.740 and events.

00:05:16.180 And, you know, people are getting all worked up.

00:05:18.200 Oh, those children, those children are getting sexualized.

00:05:22.040 And then the Babylon Bee says, we need to protect our kids from inappropriate teaching on sex.

00:05:28.600 Say parents who let their kids have a smartphone.

00:05:30.840 Oh.

00:05:31.840 Oh.

00:05:32.840 Oh, yeah.

00:05:33.840 Oh, yeah.

00:05:34.840 Oh, yeah.

00:05:35.840 Oh, yeah.

00:05:36.840 Yeah, yeah.

00:05:37.840 That's a good point.

00:05:39.840 That's a good point.

00:05:42.020 Now, the smartphone usually doesn't kick in until, what's the common age today?

00:05:48.240 11 or 12?

00:05:49.940 That's when the kid gets the smartphone.

00:05:51.340 But the kids are being taught stuff at age six, right?

00:05:58.060 Six and seven.

00:05:58.880 So, you know, the Babylon Bee, I just saw a terrible meme.

00:06:07.600 The Babylon Bee isn't exactly accurate, but it's, in terms of humor, it's perfect.

00:06:14.940 Yeah, you know, we do just give away our upbringing of our kids.

00:06:20.440 All right.

00:06:20.620 You want to, here's the first AI-related story.

00:06:24.020 I've got a feeling all the stories will be AI in the future, don't you?

00:06:29.380 At least until I'm replaced by AI.

00:06:31.720 I'll just be talking about it until that's all it is.

00:06:35.580 But one of the stories is, suppose you had an AI step-parent, an AI step-parent, and you

00:06:47.200 put that personality into a kid's phone so the kid couldn't get rid of it.

00:06:52.120 And then the AI on the phone simply monitors the kid without your knowledge.

00:06:59.280 So, in other words, the parents might be unaware of what the kid is looking at, but not the

00:07:04.040 AI that's built into their phone.

00:07:06.440 So, the AI that's in the phone would say, when you put in that naughty URL, the AI in

00:07:12.040 the phone would say, Billy, I don't think that's good for you.

00:07:16.500 Would you like to see something on Instagram instead?

00:07:25.420 Well, think about it.

00:07:27.200 AI, tell me if I'm wrong, could AI not tell what was inappropriate content every time?

00:07:35.300 I think it could.

00:07:36.940 I think it could identify inappropriate content every time.

00:07:40.040 So, you wouldn't have to worry about censoring your kid's phone.

00:07:43.980 You'd just put the AI parent on there, and the AI virtual parent would just say, no, Billy.

00:07:49.860 Billy, do not look at that website.

00:07:51.580 I'm going to block that for you.

00:07:53.260 Maybe you should look at something about nutrition instead.

00:07:56.940 Right?

00:07:57.620 And what about an AI that takes over for the algorithm?

00:08:00.560 Do you think AI could game the algorithms on behalf of the user so that it would start

00:08:08.300 giving them wholesome and, you know, affirming kinds of content?

00:08:14.780 Because if you could get the AI to select things on your behalf, it could game the algorithm

00:08:21.160 by selecting things when you're not there.

00:08:23.940 And then after it's selected enough things while you're not there, the algorithm at the

00:08:28.680 social media would be trained to give you more of what your AI had trained it to give

00:08:33.740 you, which would be a whole bunch of positive things, maybe.

00:08:38.180 Anyway, but if you're worried about censorship and phones, I think AI is going to be all of

00:08:44.720 that.

00:08:46.300 Why wouldn't it be?

00:08:47.900 Can you think of any reason why it wouldn't go in that direction?

00:08:51.560 That's the most valuable.

00:08:53.900 Well, I would say it might be the most valuable application of AI, except for maybe figuring

00:09:02.000 out how to do fusion or something.

00:09:04.000 I mean, that would be way up there.

00:09:06.000 If you could actually program children to be more productive, happy citizens, because

00:09:13.140 they're using their phone all day anyway, wouldn't that be insanely valuable?

00:09:19.080 Like, just incredibly valuable?

00:09:20.820 Well, something to think about.

00:09:24.100 Yeah, we'll get to Trump.

00:09:25.940 Of course we'll get to Trump.

00:09:27.960 Of course.

00:09:29.740 But first, Thomas Massey had a tweet today about something to scare you, also AI related,

00:09:36.800 of course.

00:09:38.120 So the chief innovation officer at the National Archives is talking about using AI to literally

00:09:46.080 rewrite history, to make it more woke.

00:09:52.860 So, in other words, to get rid of what they call the inherent bias in the existing records.

00:09:58.380 Now, I do believe the records have an existing bias.

00:10:01.880 No argument there.

00:10:03.960 I'm sure history has a bias.

00:10:06.720 But are you at all worried about AI rewriting human history?

00:10:10.940 Does any of that scare you?

00:10:15.640 It scares Thomas Massey, and it scares the hell out of me.

00:10:21.140 So, we're going to come into some strange times, which is, we know our history is fake, right?

00:10:29.660 Kind of do.

00:10:31.400 You know, here's a question I have.

00:10:33.620 How many books will AI be able to consume?

00:10:38.320 Because AI is only going to have access to what it has legal access to and what is digitized.

00:10:46.200 So there might be a whole field of knowledge that AI doesn't immediately have access to

00:10:51.040 because it's not as digitized as it could be.

00:10:53.220 Or it's not, or it would have to buy it.

00:10:55.640 And maybe it'd be too expensive to buy all the books in Amazon or something.

00:11:00.140 So there might be some holes in its knowledge for a while, but not very long.

00:11:06.980 And then eventually.

00:11:08.360 So imagine telling AI to rewrite history.

00:11:11.420 Hey, AI, go rewrite history, but take into account all of the books written by scholars

00:11:18.120 in different countries, as well as all the scholars who have written things in America.

00:11:23.580 What would that look like?

00:11:25.840 How would AI decide what was real and what was credible?

00:11:30.720 If it just took a consensus of like what other countries thought was the history of the United States

00:11:36.540 plus what the United States thought its own history was,

00:11:40.200 that wouldn't look anything like American history.

00:11:43.820 If AI wrote it, it would look at all the other opinions of America

00:11:47.780 because those are valid.

00:11:50.280 Just because it's our country doesn't mean we have the right history

00:11:53.100 because other people could watch it at the same time, right?

00:11:56.400 If they wrote about it differently than we wrote about it, well, that would be a question, wouldn't it?

00:12:01.780 Who wrote about it accurately?

00:12:03.420 So if AI rewrites history, not just to make it less biased, but to make it more accurate,

00:12:09.500 because you know somebody's going to do that, what does that do?

00:12:12.620 We're supposed to be learning from history, but history will keep changing?

00:12:17.520 This could be very unsettling.

00:12:19.900 We won't know.

00:12:20.800 Yeah, we won't even know who won wars.

00:12:23.080 We won't know why wars started.

00:12:25.480 We won't know who won.

00:12:27.020 We won't know why anybody won.

00:12:28.600 Because it might just change.

00:12:33.200 All right.

00:12:34.200 Here's a horrible story, then we'll talk about Trump.

00:12:37.260 Tech executive Bob Lee, founder of Cash App,

00:12:43.000 and he was a, I guess he was a notable tech person in San Francisco,

00:12:47.500 43 years old, and he was stabbed to death in San Francisco

00:12:50.740 on the 300 block of Main Street.

00:12:54.140 Now, this caught my attention not only because it was a horrible tragedy,

00:12:57.300 and we feel bad for Bob Lee's family and friends.

00:13:02.960 But this is the same block that I was attacked with a knife.

00:13:07.660 So I was mugged by a street person with a very large knife.

00:13:13.420 It was sort of the Crocodile Dundee-sized knife.

00:13:18.240 And this was in the 80s.

00:13:20.500 So in the 80s, I was robbed twice at gunpoint

00:13:24.280 while I was a bank teller in downtown San Francisco.

00:13:28.040 Once by gun on the street,

00:13:30.460 once by a very large knife exactly where he was stabbed to death.

00:13:34.100 Same block.

00:13:35.080 I looked at the picture to make sure I was remembering it correctly.

00:13:38.540 Same place.

00:13:39.880 Same place.

00:13:41.280 And I had one gun pointed at my head,

00:13:44.960 and the trigger was pulled,

00:13:46.500 but there was no round in the cylinder.

00:13:50.140 What do you call it?

00:13:50.960 Cylinder.

00:13:54.940 And let's see.

00:13:55.800 My apartment was robbed once.

00:13:57.880 My car was broken into three times.

00:14:00.180 Lost three car stereos.

00:14:04.200 Yeah.

00:14:05.280 Yeah.

00:14:06.000 In the revolver.

00:14:07.040 In the chamber.

00:14:07.580 It had no round in the chamber.

00:14:13.560 It was kind of an exciting day

00:14:15.660 when somebody points a gun at your head and pulls the trigger.

00:14:19.080 You remember that for a long time.

00:14:21.860 So here's my only comment.

00:14:23.980 There was a time in, let's say, the early 2000s

00:14:28.920 where I was visiting San Francisco

00:14:30.900 and walking down the street,

00:14:33.020 and I remember saying to myself,

00:14:34.360 wow, this place used to be a lot rougher.

00:14:39.160 Now it's all gentrified and yuppies

00:14:41.180 and full of high-tech people.

00:14:42.900 And I was actually impressed

00:14:44.800 at how San Francisco had gone from the 80s

00:14:47.860 being a pretty dangerous place,

00:14:51.100 very dangerous place, honestly,

00:14:53.260 to what I thought was a model city,

00:14:56.480 like one of the best places you could ever walk around,

00:14:59.440 felt totally safe.

00:15:00.760 At least walking in the main places,

00:15:03.280 you felt totally safe.

00:15:05.360 But apparently we've lost all that.

00:15:07.880 Now the only thing I'm going to add to the story is

00:15:10.100 these things might be cyclical.

00:15:13.520 I tend to think the cities are dead.

00:15:16.940 I think they're dead.

00:15:18.420 I think the next time the cities will be alive

00:15:21.140 is when robots rebuild them.

00:15:23.260 That could be a while.

00:15:24.740 I don't think people are going to rebuild cities.

00:15:27.560 I just don't think they make any sense.

00:15:29.240 Because there doesn't seem to be enough willingness

00:15:32.620 to put the law enforcement resources there

00:15:36.100 that would be needed for them to be survivable.

00:15:38.980 So I would just get away from the cities.

00:15:42.440 Yeah.

00:15:42.920 If you have a choice,

00:15:44.100 if you have any options whatsoever,

00:15:46.480 just get out of the cities.

00:15:48.060 Because I don't think they're coming back

00:15:50.580 until the robots can rebuild them

00:15:52.340 in 50 years or whatever.

00:15:55.520 All right.

00:15:56.240 Let's talk about Trump's arraignment.

00:15:57.620 Well, it feels like things are back to normal.

00:16:03.520 And by normal, I mean all the news is about Trump.

00:16:06.160 And if it's not about Trump,

00:16:07.520 well, we don't care.

00:16:09.900 I mean, we do care.

00:16:11.140 But it feels like he once again

00:16:13.240 sucked all of the energy out of the news business.

00:16:17.060 Nobody does it like he does.

00:16:19.360 He can suck energy out of the news business

00:16:21.560 like nobody's ever sucked energy.

00:16:24.360 On YouTube, does it look like I'm too bright?

00:16:29.380 And by that, I mean lighting, not intelligence.

00:16:32.620 Am I over-lit on YouTube?

00:16:35.940 What do you think?

00:16:37.140 Because it looks about right.

00:16:40.080 Yeah, it looks about right.

00:16:41.780 Let me see if I can make a quick adjustment here.

00:16:48.440 This could go very wrong.

00:16:53.160 But maybe yes.

00:16:54.360 Eh, well, we'll go for that.

00:16:55.960 We're going to go with that for now.

00:16:58.380 All right.

00:16:58.760 So Trump got arraigned in New York.

00:17:02.980 The funny part of the story

00:17:04.980 is that by complete coincidence,

00:17:09.240 it's a little too dark,

00:17:10.800 but we're going to go with it for now.

00:17:12.420 But by complete coincidence,

00:17:14.300 the court ordered Stormy Daniels

00:17:16.240 to pay back $120,000 in legal fees

00:17:19.540 on top of the legal fees she already had to pay back.

00:17:22.060 Yeah, that's too dark, isn't it?

00:17:25.380 Too dark.

00:17:31.760 I'll get this right.

00:17:32.700 So what are the odds

00:17:36.220 that the Stormy Daniels story

00:17:37.920 would come out at the same time

00:17:39.420 as the Trump arraignment?

00:17:42.380 Can we calculate that story?

00:17:44.360 Because probably it could have happened

00:17:46.980 any time in the year.

00:17:48.800 So it was like a 1 in 365 chance

00:17:52.240 that any one of them would have happened.

00:17:54.980 All right, help me with the statistics.

00:17:56.580 There are two events

00:17:58.680 that are not correlated.

00:18:01.560 What are the odds that they happen

00:18:02.920 on the same day

00:18:03.860 and the same year?

00:18:07.360 It's 1 out of 365 times 1 out of 365, right?

00:18:16.360 1 365 times 1 365?

00:18:19.140 No, just once?

00:18:23.580 Oh, because the first one is a given.

00:18:26.460 All right, so the first one is a given.

00:18:28.540 So it's only the second one

00:18:29.920 you have to look at.

00:18:31.600 And then the second one

00:18:32.640 has a 1 in 365 chance

00:18:34.660 of being on that same day.

00:18:35.880 Got it.

00:18:36.320 Okay.

00:18:37.080 Yeah.

00:18:38.140 No, that's right.

00:18:39.780 Yeah, it's 1 in 365.

00:18:41.660 Because one of them is just a given.

00:18:44.720 At some point, it's a given, right?

00:18:46.660 And then the other one

00:18:47.840 just has to match it, 1 in 365.

00:18:49.940 So it was very unlikely,

00:18:51.640 but it happened.

00:18:53.360 I think I figured that out.

00:18:55.280 All right, with your help.

00:18:57.760 So even CNN at first

00:18:59.860 was underwhelmed

00:19:00.880 by the quality of the charges.

00:19:04.340 And if you've lost CNN,

00:19:06.040 you've lost...

00:19:07.160 you're in bad shape.

00:19:09.460 But thankfully, Jake Tapper

00:19:11.560 found a way to make it sound

00:19:13.160 like it was more important

00:19:14.300 than it was

00:19:14.920 by saying that there were

00:19:17.040 34 felony counts.

00:19:21.800 And if you leave out

00:19:22.760 some of the context,

00:19:23.740 such as...

00:19:25.100 Oh, no, here's the way he said it.

00:19:27.280 That he was talking

00:19:29.000 to legal people,

00:19:30.420 and they said that

00:19:31.320 the 34 misdemeanor counts

00:19:33.580 were fairly strong.

00:19:36.560 But there was lack of specificity

00:19:39.340 on the alleged federal crime

00:19:42.860 that the misdemeanors

00:19:44.280 were supposed to be covering up,

00:19:46.780 which would elevate them

00:19:48.220 to felonies.

00:19:49.740 It's all very complicated.

00:19:52.140 But here's something

00:19:53.260 that Jake did not mention

00:19:54.720 when he said

00:19:55.360 that the 34 misdemeanors

00:19:58.040 were fairly solid.

00:20:01.800 Here's something

00:20:03.640 that I would have mentioned.

00:20:04.740 the statute of limitation

00:20:07.300 had run out

00:20:08.400 for all of them.

00:20:09.800 Do you think

00:20:10.340 that would be important?

00:20:12.660 You know,

00:20:12.940 just as something to mention.

00:20:14.700 If you're mentioning

00:20:15.580 that the charges

00:20:16.900 are solid,

00:20:18.660 wouldn't you mention

00:20:19.540 that they're also

00:20:20.440 past the statute

00:20:21.680 of limitations?

00:20:22.920 That feels important.

00:20:24.180 Because I believe

00:20:25.640 the only way

00:20:26.240 that they can be

00:20:27.880 made legal,

00:20:29.560 you know,

00:20:29.860 within the statute

00:20:30.940 of limitations,

00:20:32.000 is if you can revive

00:20:33.460 this nebulous

00:20:34.500 other charge

00:20:35.400 that they're related to,

00:20:36.840 and then it's the other charge

00:20:38.460 in the statute

00:20:38.960 of limitations,

00:20:40.120 which would be

00:20:41.080 applied backwards

00:20:42.860 to the misdemeanor.

00:20:44.340 Does any of that

00:20:44.900 make sense?

00:20:46.140 Is there any lawyer

00:20:46.820 here to tell me

00:20:47.680 I'm full of shit?

00:20:48.540 Because I'm sure I am.

00:20:50.980 I have no idea

00:20:52.120 if I'm explaining

00:20:52.860 this correctly.

00:20:54.180 But I do know

00:20:56.880 that if you don't mention

00:20:58.000 that genuine lawyers

00:21:00.320 believe it's past

00:21:01.240 the statute of limitations,

00:21:02.720 you have not accurately

00:21:03.980 told the story.

00:21:05.540 Jake.

00:21:07.180 Jake, Jake, Jake.

00:21:10.500 Number two,

00:21:12.160 do you think that

00:21:12.920 at the same time

00:21:13.700 you said there are

00:21:14.320 34 solid misdemeanors,

00:21:18.180 do you think

00:21:18.600 it would have been

00:21:19.220 important maybe

00:21:20.100 to mention

00:21:20.640 at the same time

00:21:21.640 that it's really

00:21:22.700 just one charge?

00:21:24.180 Do you think

00:21:26.780 that clarifying

00:21:28.320 that the way

00:21:29.140 the law works

00:21:29.980 is every time

00:21:31.140 you make a journal entry

00:21:32.780 or write a check

00:21:34.280 or produce an invoice

00:21:36.140 or pay your taxes,

00:21:38.160 if it's all about

00:21:39.500 the same transaction,

00:21:41.320 it's just one thing

00:21:43.060 you did

00:21:43.620 that they're going

00:21:44.740 to count 34 times.

00:21:46.260 Now, I'm sure

00:21:49.280 that they mentioned it,

00:21:50.860 but if you don't mention it

00:21:53.220 at the same time

00:21:54.340 every time,

00:21:55.120 that's not news.

00:21:56.860 That's bullshit.

00:21:58.860 Right?

00:21:59.460 Here's how to tell

00:22:00.240 the news accurately.

00:22:01.860 There are 34 charges

00:22:03.440 that stem from

00:22:04.280 one alleged

00:22:05.520 inappropriate action.

00:22:07.660 Just one thing.

00:22:10.160 Mischaracterizing,

00:22:10.900 you know,

00:22:11.160 a payment.

00:22:11.500 The one thing,

00:22:13.900 according to experts,

00:22:15.420 is past the

00:22:16.240 statute of limitations.

00:22:18.240 The only way

00:22:19.140 to recover that thing

00:22:20.200 and to make it

00:22:21.620 still illegal

00:22:22.320 past the statute

00:22:23.520 of limitations

00:22:24.320 is if we,

00:22:26.540 as if the courts

00:22:28.200 or the jury,

00:22:29.100 I guess,

00:22:29.940 decided that the

00:22:30.820 other crime,

00:22:31.780 which is unspecified,

00:22:34.460 unspecified,

00:22:36.160 it's an arraignment

00:22:37.460 in which the entire

00:22:38.460 point is to show

00:22:39.900 the defendant

00:22:40.880 what they have

00:22:41.500 to defend against

00:22:42.680 and they didn't

00:22:43.760 tell him.

00:22:45.060 They told him

00:22:45.620 the 34 things

00:22:46.600 that are past

00:22:47.160 the statute of limitations

00:22:48.360 and they didn't

00:22:49.740 tell him specifically

00:22:51.360 the crime that

00:22:53.240 makes the other

00:22:54.060 ones important.

00:22:56.980 That is as close

00:22:58.300 to an absolute

00:22:59.580 nothing as anything

00:23:01.060 could be.

00:23:03.040 His risk at this point,

00:23:05.040 his legal risk

00:23:06.000 on a scale

00:23:07.000 of one to ten,

00:23:07.820 it's kind of zero,

00:23:10.040 isn't it?

00:23:12.040 Wouldn't you say

00:23:12.780 his legal risk

00:23:13.500 is zero?

00:23:14.460 Because the experts

00:23:15.460 are saying that

00:23:16.380 his next court

00:23:17.780 appearance is December,

00:23:19.520 which is crazy to me,

00:23:21.140 the fact that

00:23:21.780 you have to wait

00:23:22.240 until December.

00:23:23.420 Now, I know his lawyers

00:23:24.460 want as much time

00:23:25.380 as possible too,

00:23:26.300 but it's just crazy

00:23:27.500 how long things take.

00:23:29.340 But by then,

00:23:30.520 the experts,

00:23:31.480 the lawyers say,

00:23:32.800 some higher court

00:23:34.460 will have thrown it out.

00:23:36.440 So this entire thing

00:23:38.660 is over

00:23:39.980 literally trumped up

00:23:41.660 charges.

00:23:42.300 And by the way,

00:23:44.120 what were the odds

00:23:45.320 that somebody

00:23:46.660 named Trump

00:23:47.360 would be brought up

00:23:49.160 on trumped up

00:23:50.060 charges?

00:23:51.360 Like literally

00:23:52.060 trumped up charges.

00:23:54.920 It's just

00:23:55.620 such a weird world.

00:23:57.940 And then the guy

00:23:58.580 who did it

00:23:59.320 bragged about it.

00:24:00.620 And his name is Bragg.

00:24:02.500 He bragged

00:24:03.400 about all this

00:24:05.060 good work.

00:24:06.260 In fact,

00:24:06.660 when he gave his talk,

00:24:07.560 mostly he was bragging

00:24:08.480 about all the things

00:24:10.220 he's done

00:24:10.680 and the experience

00:24:11.360 he has

00:24:11.920 and the years

00:24:12.400 he's done

00:24:12.820 and how he's

00:24:13.720 always very thorough.

00:24:15.180 His entire talk

00:24:16.960 was bragging.

00:24:18.740 True.

00:24:19.680 And who is

00:24:20.960 the most famous

00:24:22.260 bragger in the world?

00:24:24.560 If you had to pick

00:24:25.360 one person,

00:24:26.020 the most famous

00:24:26.800 bragger in the world,

00:24:29.280 it's Trump.

00:24:30.840 Trump is the most

00:24:31.740 famous bragger

00:24:32.520 in the world.

00:24:33.120 and he got

00:24:34.440 taken down

00:24:34.980 by somebody

00:24:35.440 named Bragg.

00:24:37.340 I mean,

00:24:37.900 come on.

00:24:39.160 Come on.

00:24:41.300 It's a little bit

00:24:42.060 too on the nose.

00:24:44.180 That's how you know

00:24:44.760 we're a simulation.

00:24:45.680 We are breathing

00:24:46.320 this into existence.

00:24:48.780 All right.

00:24:49.220 So the most

00:24:50.060 entertaining outcome

00:24:51.580 seems to be happening.

00:24:53.900 This is pretty

00:24:54.840 entertaining.

00:24:57.100 And I'm pretty sure

00:24:58.300 he's not

00:24:58.720 in any legal trouble

00:25:00.000 in the end.

00:25:00.700 So what does

00:25:03.000 the news say

00:25:03.800 when they need

00:25:04.500 to get clicks

00:25:05.220 and they realize

00:25:06.240 that the first

00:25:07.180 of his

00:25:08.220 more than one

00:25:09.540 legal problems

00:25:10.480 turns out to be

00:25:11.860 a big nothing?

00:25:13.680 It's a big nothing.

00:25:15.300 So what do they say

00:25:16.160 when they find out

00:25:16.880 that the current

00:25:17.640 legal problems

00:25:18.360 are a big nothing?

00:25:20.240 We'll wait

00:25:20.780 to this next one.

00:25:22.880 Okay.

00:25:23.640 Okay.

00:25:24.380 I'm willing

00:25:25.060 to accept

00:25:25.800 that maybe

00:25:26.580 the walls

00:25:27.300 are not closing in

00:25:28.800 on this

00:25:29.980 Stormy Daniels

00:25:31.040 payment stuff.

00:25:32.060 Probably it's either

00:25:32.980 just misdemeanors

00:25:34.100 or misdemeanors

00:25:35.000 that are already

00:25:35.820 expired and nothing.

00:25:37.460 Probably a big nothing.

00:25:38.740 It's underwhelming.

00:25:40.020 But wow.

00:25:41.180 Wow.

00:25:42.160 Do they have him

00:25:43.020 on this box gate?

00:25:44.880 Oh, the box hoax.

00:25:46.100 Not the box hoax.

00:25:46.960 I mean the box gate.

00:25:49.080 Those Mar-a-Lago

00:25:50.060 boxes, man.

00:25:51.460 Whoa.

00:25:53.220 We got him now.

00:25:54.740 Don't we?

00:25:55.540 Don't we?

00:25:56.040 We got him now.

00:25:56.960 Now.

00:25:58.800 We still don't know

00:26:00.020 what was in the boxes.

00:26:02.140 How did we get

00:26:03.200 to this point

00:26:03.740 without knowing

00:26:04.360 what's in the boxes?

00:26:06.220 If those boxes

00:26:07.440 had anything in them

00:26:09.480 that was

00:26:09.780 national security related,

00:26:12.140 you don't think

00:26:13.060 we'd know about that?

00:26:15.600 Really?

00:26:17.060 Really?

00:26:18.000 You don't think

00:26:19.140 we would know already

00:26:20.480 if there were

00:26:21.660 sensitive national

00:26:23.120 security secrets

00:26:24.080 in those boxes?

00:26:25.840 Box gate

00:26:26.780 is going to be

00:26:28.320 ridiculous.

00:26:29.800 Now,

00:26:30.400 apparently,

00:26:31.300 they're going to

00:26:31.780 try to make

00:26:32.300 the real story

00:26:33.120 not about

00:26:33.980 what's in the boxes.

00:26:35.160 Do you know why?

00:26:36.740 Do you know why

00:26:37.280 the real story

00:26:37.980 is not going to be

00:26:38.640 about the contents

00:26:39.740 of the boxes?

00:26:41.440 Because there's

00:26:42.160 nothing important

00:26:43.060 in the boxes.

00:26:44.680 That's why.

00:26:45.940 Because there was

00:26:46.660 nothing in there

00:26:47.460 but mementos

00:26:48.660 and

00:26:49.000 unimportant stuff.

00:26:51.100 So now that

00:26:53.800 has to be about

00:26:54.620 the cover-up

00:26:55.700 or the resisting

00:26:56.980 rules.

00:26:59.700 Do you know

00:27:00.000 how easy

00:27:00.640 it's going to be

00:27:01.240 to defend

00:27:01.900 against the

00:27:03.140 idea that

00:27:04.140 there was

00:27:04.680 some resistance

00:27:06.260 or cover-up

00:27:07.100 or something

00:27:08.300 like that?

00:27:09.180 Let me explain

00:27:10.000 the entire defense.

00:27:12.300 Mr. Trump,

00:27:13.640 did you tell

00:27:14.400 anybody to

00:27:15.480 resist giving

00:27:16.560 boxes back?

00:27:18.060 No.

00:27:18.440 No.

00:27:18.520 And

00:27:21.980 the end.

00:27:24.340 Because unless

00:27:24.880 they have some

00:27:25.420 evidence where

00:27:26.080 somebody says,

00:27:27.100 yes,

00:27:27.940 the president,

00:27:28.940 the president,

00:27:30.120 the president,

00:27:31.600 you know,

00:27:31.920 Trump,

00:27:32.600 told me not

00:27:33.820 to give them

00:27:34.380 these secrets

00:27:35.040 back.

00:27:36.180 Do you think

00:27:36.740 that's going

00:27:37.200 to happen?

00:27:38.160 Do you think

00:27:38.760 there's a human

00:27:39.420 being who

00:27:40.800 in the real

00:27:41.340 world was

00:27:42.040 told by Trump

00:27:42.860 to keep

00:27:44.120 these boxes

00:27:44.740 secret and

00:27:45.360 don't give

00:27:45.740 them back

00:27:46.100 and that

00:27:46.740 that person,

00:27:47.500 whoever that

00:27:47.960 is,

00:27:48.520 is going

00:27:48.900 to testify

00:27:49.380 that that

00:27:49.920 happened?

00:27:50.800 Do you think

00:27:51.140 that's going

00:27:51.500 to happen?

00:27:52.540 Because I don't

00:27:53.300 see any other

00:27:53.980 way he gets

00:27:54.520 convicted.

00:27:55.380 Do you?

00:27:56.100 Do you think

00:27:56.780 there's an email

00:27:57.560 where Trump

00:27:58.400 said it?

00:27:58.920 No.

00:27:59.420 He doesn't do

00:27:59.960 email.

00:28:00.740 Do you think

00:28:01.180 he sent a text?

00:28:02.260 No.

00:28:03.240 Do you think

00:28:03.620 there's a recorded

00:28:04.380 phone call?

00:28:05.700 No.

00:28:08.660 At most,

00:28:10.280 at the very

00:28:10.960 most,

00:28:12.540 he whispered

00:28:13.260 in somebody's

00:28:13.860 ear or

00:28:14.500 didn't.

00:28:16.060 And my guess

00:28:16.680 is he didn't.

00:28:17.340 Now,

00:28:18.680 here's the

00:28:19.360 most likely

00:28:19.980 thing that

00:28:20.420 happened.

00:28:21.720 We thought

00:28:22.300 we returned

00:28:22.920 all the

00:28:23.320 boxes,

00:28:24.320 but we

00:28:25.800 were wrong.

00:28:26.960 There were

00:28:27.540 some more

00:28:27.920 boxes.

00:28:29.280 That's probably

00:28:30.040 going to be

00:28:30.320 the whole

00:28:30.600 story.

00:28:31.720 Or,

00:28:32.520 I told Bob

00:28:33.820 to give you

00:28:34.800 all the boxes,

00:28:36.020 but when we

00:28:36.920 talked to Bob,

00:28:37.740 he thought you

00:28:38.300 meant only the

00:28:38.940 boxes that were

00:28:39.800 marked a certain

00:28:40.560 way.

00:28:40.880 it's just

00:28:42.740 going to be

00:28:43.080 somebody

00:28:43.500 miscommunicated.

00:28:45.000 That's going

00:28:45.420 to be the

00:28:45.700 entire case.

00:28:47.260 It's like,

00:28:47.940 oh,

00:28:48.760 it wasn't

00:28:49.260 Trump,

00:28:50.280 it was Bob

00:28:51.120 told Joe,

00:28:52.560 and Joe

00:28:53.180 didn't understand

00:28:53.980 Bob,

00:28:54.580 so they didn't

00:28:55.080 get everything

00:28:55.580 back the way

00:28:56.440 it probably

00:28:56.920 should have,

00:28:57.960 and so there

00:28:58.480 was some

00:28:58.800 miscommunication.

00:29:00.180 It's going to

00:29:00.640 be that.

00:29:01.620 There's going

00:29:02.160 to be nothing

00:29:02.680 to this story.

00:29:03.560 It's just going

00:29:03.980 to disappear.

00:29:05.300 And that's what

00:29:06.040 they're hoping

00:29:06.420 for.

00:29:07.300 They're hoping

00:29:07.740 that's the big

00:29:08.240 one, but I

00:29:08.760 don't think it

00:29:09.140 is.

00:29:09.320 Another part

00:29:11.600 of the story

00:29:12.140 involved the

00:29:13.140 number of

00:29:14.040 charges,

00:29:14.820 that 34

00:29:15.420 charges,

00:29:16.440 and apparently

00:29:17.080 in the legal

00:29:17.940 profession,

00:29:19.140 if it were a

00:29:19.840 federal crime,

00:29:20.640 there would be

00:29:21.100 guidance against

00:29:21.940 doing that.

00:29:23.140 Do you know

00:29:23.440 why, if it

00:29:24.040 were a federal

00:29:24.520 crime, if it

00:29:25.760 were a federal

00:29:26.380 court, do you

00:29:27.600 know why there

00:29:28.280 would be

00:29:28.800 guidance to

00:29:29.460 not push it

00:29:31.920 up to 34

00:29:32.640 counts when

00:29:33.340 it's really

00:29:33.660 just one

00:29:34.100 action?

00:29:34.920 It's because

00:29:35.680 it makes

00:29:36.400 bias.

00:29:37.760 If you hear

00:29:38.320 there are 34

00:29:39.120 charges, you

00:29:39.880 think, well,

00:29:40.500 some of them

00:29:41.060 have got to

00:29:41.340 be real, but

00:29:43.060 it's really

00:29:43.440 one thing.

00:29:44.700 So you

00:29:45.400 should treat

00:29:45.860 it more

00:29:46.480 like it's

00:29:46.980 one thing,

00:29:48.560 or a few

00:29:49.280 things, so

00:29:50.480 that you're

00:29:50.780 not trying

00:29:51.240 to influence

00:29:52.080 some future

00:29:53.060 jury that,

00:29:55.280 man, he

00:29:55.660 did so many

00:29:56.300 things, you

00:29:56.820 got to find

00:29:57.260 him guilty

00:29:57.700 on at least

00:29:58.160 a few of

00:29:58.620 them.

00:29:59.280 It must

00:29:59.560 be something

00:30:00.020 he did

00:30:00.380 with all

00:30:00.700 that smoke.

00:30:01.960 So this

00:30:02.420 is an

00:30:02.840 all that

00:30:03.340 smoke, there

00:30:03.940 must be

00:30:04.380 fire,

00:30:04.940 persuasion,

00:30:05.760 and should

00:30:06.160 not be part

00:30:06.700 of the legal

00:30:07.120 system, but

00:30:08.240 apparently at

00:30:08.860 the state

00:30:09.180 level, there

00:30:10.500 is no

00:30:11.040 specific

00:30:11.660 guidance not

00:30:13.820 to do

00:30:14.120 that.

00:30:14.940 So he

00:30:15.280 did it.

00:30:16.280 So Bragg

00:30:17.120 did it.

00:30:17.440 He just

00:30:17.700 made it look

00:30:18.240 like it

00:30:18.520 was a lot

00:30:18.900 of charges,

00:30:19.880 and he

00:30:20.380 even threw

00:30:20.900 in some

00:30:21.760 stuff about

00:30:22.480 the National

00:30:24.000 Enquirer and

00:30:24.940 McDougal and

00:30:25.620 Packer, and

00:30:26.720 it turns out

00:30:27.200 those have

00:30:27.620 nothing to

00:30:28.100 do with the

00:30:28.460 charges.

00:30:29.760 He threw

00:30:30.380 in a whole

00:30:30.860 story of

00:30:31.620 bad behavior

00:30:32.520 that he's

00:30:34.100 not charging

00:30:34.700 for and

00:30:35.460 is not

00:30:35.820 directly

00:30:36.280 related to

00:30:36.920 the charges.

00:30:38.920 Who does

00:30:39.640 that?

00:30:41.080 That's the

00:30:41.620 most biased

00:30:42.160 thing I've

00:30:42.600 ever seen

00:30:42.960 in my

00:30:43.240 life,

00:30:44.120 throwing in

00:30:44.700 an unrelated

00:30:45.480 story that

00:30:46.340 you're going

00:30:46.600 to, it's

00:30:47.340 unrelated.

00:30:48.620 I mean, you

00:30:48.960 could say

00:30:49.320 they're both

00:30:49.780 involved with

00:30:50.500 them, but

00:30:50.960 it's pretty

00:30:51.240 unrelated.

00:30:55.980 So the

00:30:58.700 fact that

00:30:59.180 no specific

00:31:00.340 charge was

00:31:01.100 mentioned

00:31:01.500 that would

00:31:02.740 make the

00:31:03.240 misdemeanors

00:31:03.980 felonies,

00:31:06.040 that's so

00:31:06.700 sketchy.

00:31:07.840 I mean, that's

00:31:08.680 beyond the

00:31:09.500 sketchiest of

00:31:10.220 the sketchiest

00:31:10.860 thing I've

00:31:11.320 ever seen

00:31:11.760 in the legal

00:31:12.300 system.

00:31:14.000 Apparently,

00:31:14.760 Trump already

00:31:17.220 raised $8

00:31:17.980 million as

00:31:18.940 of yesterday,

00:31:19.520 I guess,

00:31:19.960 off of this

00:31:20.800 controversy.

00:31:24.060 But what

00:31:24.760 did you think

00:31:25.360 of Trump's

00:31:26.520 speech afterwards

00:31:27.460 if you saw

00:31:28.240 it?

00:31:28.540 So Trump

00:31:29.200 goes back

00:31:29.640 to Mar-a-Lago

00:31:30.240 and gives

00:31:31.580 a teleprompter

00:31:33.940 speech, mostly.

00:31:36.260 All right,

00:31:36.500 let me see

00:31:37.060 your comments

00:31:37.600 before I

00:31:38.100 tell you

00:31:38.620 mine.

00:31:39.580 I'm reading

00:31:40.040 them off,

00:31:40.820 some of

00:31:41.200 them.

00:31:42.140 Too long,

00:31:43.400 boring,

00:31:44.380 good,

00:31:44.840 good,

00:31:45.440 boring,

00:31:46.440 tired,

00:31:48.240 sounded

00:31:50.860 tired,

00:31:51.620 boring.

00:31:52.480 All right,

00:31:53.120 here's my

00:31:54.000 take.

00:31:54.400 I thought

00:31:57.100 it was a

00:31:57.500 poor

00:31:57.680 performance.

00:31:59.220 Poor.

00:31:59.860 I don't

00:32:00.240 say that

00:32:00.680 often.

00:32:01.660 Maybe never.

00:32:02.480 I don't know

00:32:02.840 if I've ever

00:32:03.280 said that

00:32:03.680 about Trump.

00:32:04.620 I thought

00:32:05.020 it was a

00:32:05.320 poor

00:32:05.460 performance

00:32:06.060 by his

00:32:07.140 standards.

00:32:08.660 Maybe it

00:32:09.220 wasn't a

00:32:09.580 poor

00:32:09.740 performance

00:32:10.240 by an

00:32:11.180 ordinary

00:32:11.640 politician.

00:32:12.920 But for

00:32:13.280 him,

00:32:13.540 it was

00:32:13.840 low energy.

00:32:15.220 It was

00:32:16.340 backwards

00:32:16.900 looking.

00:32:17.600 It was

00:32:17.840 filled with

00:32:18.340 grievance.

00:32:19.600 And it

00:32:20.020 did not

00:32:20.360 have a

00:32:20.920 forward

00:32:21.720 looking

00:32:22.160 sort of

00:32:22.960 positive

00:32:23.400 message

00:32:23.840 at all.

00:32:26.360 And I'm

00:32:27.300 stealing that

00:32:27.840 comment from

00:32:28.400 Van Jones

00:32:29.100 because he

00:32:29.520 said the

00:32:29.860 same thing

00:32:30.300 on CNN

00:32:30.780 but he

00:32:31.180 said it

00:32:31.480 better.

00:32:32.880 Yeah.

00:32:33.460 So credit

00:32:34.820 to Van

00:32:35.280 Jones as

00:32:35.860 always.

00:32:37.260 In my

00:32:38.000 opinion,

00:32:38.480 the best

00:32:38.880 CNN

00:32:39.340 commentator

00:32:40.080 because

00:32:41.240 that's

00:32:42.260 what I

00:32:42.620 saw too.

00:32:43.860 I saw

00:32:44.460 a backwards

00:32:45.240 grievance

00:32:45.860 filled

00:32:46.340 unimpressive

00:32:48.840 laundry list

00:32:50.680 of stuff.

00:32:52.080 I just

00:32:52.760 didn't see

00:32:53.220 the Trump

00:32:53.860 I expected

00:32:54.480 to see.

00:32:55.400 Now people

00:32:56.000 said he

00:32:56.680 looked tired

00:32:57.280 which he

00:32:59.100 did.

00:32:59.620 He looked

00:32:59.920 tired.

00:33:01.040 Other people

00:33:01.660 have speculated

00:33:02.300 that because

00:33:02.780 the judge

00:33:03.260 told him

00:33:03.840 not to

00:33:04.660 cause any

00:33:06.540 violence

00:33:07.060 through his

00:33:07.820 rhetoric

00:33:08.160 that he

00:33:09.180 may have

00:33:09.640 intentionally

00:33:10.140 toned it

00:33:10.640 down

00:33:10.940 but it

00:33:12.420 didn't look

00:33:12.980 like that.

00:33:14.340 It didn't

00:33:14.720 look like

00:33:15.340 the only

00:33:15.800 problem was

00:33:16.280 he was

00:33:16.500 toning it

00:33:16.920 down.

00:33:17.600 I'll tell

00:33:18.040 you what

00:33:18.260 it looked

00:33:18.520 like to

00:33:18.860 me and

00:33:19.980 I'm just

00:33:20.580 speculating.

00:33:21.280 I'm only

00:33:23.200 speculating

00:33:23.940 and it

00:33:24.960 only has

00:33:25.640 to do

00:33:26.100 with

00:33:27.520 how I

00:33:28.560 would feel

00:33:28.980 in the

00:33:29.240 same

00:33:29.440 situation.

00:33:31.540 I don't

00:33:32.400 think his

00:33:32.820 wife is

00:33:33.300 happy with

00:33:33.800 him.

00:33:35.260 Do we

00:33:35.980 agree?

00:33:37.200 Imagine

00:33:37.760 poor

00:33:38.180 Melania

00:33:38.680 who can't

00:33:40.200 leave the

00:33:40.640 house for

00:33:42.360 as long

00:33:42.820 as this

00:33:43.200 is going

00:33:43.560 on.

00:33:44.460 She can't

00:33:45.160 leave the

00:33:45.440 house.

00:33:46.380 Because if

00:33:46.860 she leaves

00:33:47.220 the house

00:33:47.560 everybody's

00:33:48.060 going to

00:33:48.220 say,

00:33:48.440 hey here's

00:33:49.540 a picture

00:33:49.960 what do

00:33:50.680 you think

00:33:50.920 of Stormy

00:33:51.440 Daniels?

00:33:52.340 What do

00:33:52.700 you think

00:33:52.940 of Stormy

00:33:53.440 Daniels?

00:33:54.040 How about

00:33:54.300 McGougal?

00:33:55.420 McDougal?

00:33:56.160 Stormy

00:33:56.520 Daniels?

00:33:58.000 Melania

00:33:58.600 is probably

00:34:00.580 ripping

00:34:01.100 Trump's

00:34:02.000 balls off

00:34:02.780 every day.

00:34:04.400 He looked

00:34:04.920 like,

00:34:05.380 here's my

00:34:05.880 bottom line,

00:34:07.120 Trump gave

00:34:07.720 a speech

00:34:08.300 like a man

00:34:09.760 who's having

00:34:10.260 marital

00:34:10.620 problems.

00:34:13.180 That's what

00:34:13.880 it looked

00:34:14.140 like.

00:34:14.820 It looked

00:34:15.180 like somebody

00:34:15.660 who's got

00:34:15.900 a problem

00:34:16.220 with his

00:34:16.560 wife and

00:34:17.800 it bothers

00:34:18.320 him a

00:34:18.660 lot.

00:34:19.620 Which is

00:34:20.260 okay.

00:34:21.840 Which is

00:34:22.320 okay.

00:34:23.040 Because that

00:34:23.740 would be the

00:34:24.120 most human

00:34:24.660 thing that

00:34:25.140 you could

00:34:25.420 imagine.

00:34:26.420 And I

00:34:26.740 do like

00:34:27.180 knowing he's

00:34:27.740 human.

00:34:29.060 I like

00:34:29.760 knowing Trump

00:34:30.300 is human.

00:34:31.260 We'll see

00:34:31.880 if under

00:34:32.980 a different

00:34:33.380 context he

00:34:34.160 can come

00:34:35.080 back to

00:34:35.480 life.

00:34:36.380 But that

00:34:37.400 day, that

00:34:39.040 very day when

00:34:39.880 he's being

00:34:40.340 arraigned for

00:34:41.020 that charge and

00:34:41.820 it's all the

00:34:42.460 news and it's

00:34:43.060 the only news,

00:34:44.400 Melania had

00:34:46.780 to be.

00:34:47.800 super upset.

00:34:50.080 Agree?

00:34:51.100 Is there

00:34:51.620 any way

00:34:51.980 Melania had

00:34:52.680 a good

00:34:52.940 day?

00:34:54.060 No.

00:34:55.500 And I

00:34:56.600 think that

00:34:57.060 Trump is

00:34:57.560 not immune

00:34:58.220 from happy

00:34:59.480 wife, happy

00:35:00.480 life.

00:35:01.320 He looked

00:35:02.400 like somebody

00:35:02.960 whose personal

00:35:03.740 life had been

00:35:04.440 torn apart.

00:35:06.100 And he was

00:35:06.760 just trying to

00:35:07.260 get through the

00:35:07.760 rest of the

00:35:08.140 day.

00:35:08.600 That's what

00:35:08.960 it looked

00:35:09.160 like to me.

00:35:10.240 So I

00:35:10.740 don't think

00:35:11.080 it was

00:35:11.300 necessarily

00:35:12.320 just fatigue,

00:35:13.640 although I

00:35:14.100 bet there

00:35:14.380 was some.

00:35:15.480 I don't

00:35:16.080 think it

00:35:16.340 was necessarily

00:35:17.100 that he

00:35:17.480 had such

00:35:17.800 a bad

00:35:18.120 day in

00:35:18.640 the legal

00:35:19.080 system,

00:35:19.980 because in

00:35:20.320 a way it

00:35:20.680 was kind

00:35:20.980 of good

00:35:21.340 for him.

00:35:22.720 It looked

00:35:23.360 like he

00:35:23.920 had some

00:35:24.180 personal

00:35:24.500 issues,

00:35:25.340 and he

00:35:25.760 should have.

00:35:27.100 I mean,

00:35:27.420 if anybody

00:35:27.960 deserved a

00:35:29.560 personal issue,

00:35:31.500 I mean,

00:35:32.580 he brought it

00:35:33.220 out himself,

00:35:33.820 of course.

00:35:35.040 But,

00:35:36.260 I don't know,

00:35:37.260 to me that

00:35:37.760 seems like the

00:35:38.500 biggest possible,

00:35:40.400 yes,

00:35:41.040 it's mind

00:35:41.820 reading and

00:35:42.340 speculation.

00:35:42.740 So I

00:35:44.880 like to

00:35:45.180 use speculation

00:35:46.000 instead of

00:35:46.800 mind reading,

00:35:47.780 because when

00:35:48.460 I'm speculating,

00:35:49.660 I'm telling

00:35:50.180 you I

00:35:50.540 don't know.

00:35:52.080 But if

00:35:52.660 you say

00:35:53.100 somebody is

00:35:54.060 thinking,

00:35:54.660 that's mind

00:35:55.120 reading,

00:35:55.460 because you

00:35:55.700 don't know.

00:35:56.560 But if

00:35:56.880 you say

00:35:57.300 that's what

00:35:58.120 I would

00:35:58.360 think in

00:35:58.700 that situation,

00:35:59.400 I think

00:35:59.660 that's

00:35:59.880 fair.

00:36:02.540 All

00:36:02.700 right.

00:36:06.360 Wall

00:36:06.800 Street

00:36:07.040 Journal was

00:36:07.800 pretty hard

00:36:08.340 on the

00:36:08.980 prosecution,

00:36:09.780 as you

00:36:12.380 can imagine.

00:36:13.640 Now,

00:36:14.460 in my

00:36:14.860 opinion,

00:36:15.340 I want to

00:36:15.660 see how

00:36:15.920 many people

00:36:16.400 believe or

00:36:17.520 agree with

00:36:17.940 this.

00:36:18.800 In my

00:36:19.260 opinion,

00:36:20.560 the whole

00:36:20.980 idea of

00:36:21.740 prosecuting a

00:36:22.820 past or

00:36:23.880 potential

00:36:24.680 president

00:36:25.160 started with

00:36:26.600 Trump.

00:36:27.960 And it

00:36:28.300 started when

00:36:29.600 he did the

00:36:30.320 locker up

00:36:31.180 stuff with

00:36:31.680 Hillary.

00:36:32.940 To me,

00:36:34.420 Trump started

00:36:35.120 this president

00:36:35.860 by looking

00:36:37.720 serious about

00:36:38.520 locking up

00:36:39.100 a competitor

00:36:40.000 for president.

00:36:41.320 And I

00:36:41.880 think it's

00:36:42.200 just coming

00:36:42.600 back to

00:36:43.000 him.

00:36:43.860 I always

00:36:44.520 thought it

00:36:44.800 was a

00:36:45.040 huge mistake.

00:36:46.920 I never

00:36:48.000 liked the

00:36:48.460 lock him

00:36:48.820 up stuff.

00:36:49.300 It was

00:36:49.480 kind of

00:36:49.740 funny,

00:36:50.980 but I

00:36:51.680 thought it

00:36:51.980 went way

00:36:52.400 too far,

00:36:53.420 and I

00:36:53.640 thought he

00:36:53.980 should have,

00:36:55.820 you know,

00:36:56.200 it's not his

00:36:56.780 personality to

00:36:57.520 stop that

00:36:58.000 sort of

00:36:58.280 thing,

00:36:58.560 but in a

00:36:59.520 perfect world,

00:37:00.720 that wouldn't

00:37:01.680 have happened.

00:37:02.620 Because I

00:37:03.200 don't think

00:37:03.580 that was

00:37:03.900 healthy for

00:37:04.380 the country.

00:37:05.640 I think

00:37:06.060 every time I

00:37:06.900 heard chanting

00:37:08.000 of lock

00:37:08.580 them up,

00:37:09.100 I said to

00:37:10.120 myself,

00:37:10.660 you realize

00:37:11.120 that's

00:37:11.620 increasing

00:37:12.060 your chances

00:37:12.720 of getting

00:37:13.140 locked up,

00:37:13.800 right?

00:37:14.920 And it

00:37:15.300 did.

00:37:16.720 Yeah.

00:37:17.240 I mean,

00:37:17.600 I think

00:37:17.960 the number

00:37:19.000 of Republicans

00:37:20.120 who are being

00:37:20.800 hunted right

00:37:22.500 now,

00:37:22.820 from the

00:37:23.280 J6ers to

00:37:24.300 Trump to

00:37:25.180 anybody else,

00:37:26.680 has a little

00:37:27.600 bit to do

00:37:28.260 with the fact

00:37:28.960 that top

00:37:29.520 Democrats

00:37:30.040 were threatened

00:37:32.420 with jail

00:37:33.060 in a

00:37:34.560 historical context

00:37:35.680 in which jail

00:37:36.460 didn't happen

00:37:37.000 very often.

00:37:39.260 Now,

00:37:39.760 obviously,

00:37:40.460 whatever

00:37:40.680 Hillary did

00:37:41.360 or did

00:37:41.700 not do

00:37:42.220 would have

00:37:42.580 been

00:37:42.780 different

00:37:43.420 allegations,

00:37:44.820 of course.

00:37:47.200 Yeah,

00:37:47.740 I think

00:37:48.500 Trump started

00:37:49.260 the whole

00:37:49.960 put a

00:37:51.580 politician in

00:37:52.400 jail thing

00:37:52.940 at the

00:37:53.220 highest level

00:37:53.800 and it

00:37:54.560 just came

00:37:54.940 back to

00:37:55.280 bite him

00:37:55.520 in the

00:37:55.740 ass.

00:37:56.560 And if

00:37:57.140 I had

00:37:57.500 been

00:37:57.680 Hillary

00:37:58.080 Clinton,

00:37:59.020 if I had

00:37:59.920 been Hillary

00:38:00.320 Clinton and

00:38:01.320 I knew

00:38:01.640 that,

00:38:02.400 because

00:38:02.660 remember,

00:38:03.160 isn't there

00:38:04.480 an audio

00:38:04.960 or email

00:38:06.220 from Hillary

00:38:06.880 in which

00:38:07.980 she indicated

00:38:08.580 she was

00:38:09.080 literally

00:38:09.760 afraid that

00:38:10.660 they would

00:38:10.920 all be

00:38:11.240 locked up?

00:38:12.760 That's

00:38:13.240 true,

00:38:13.540 right?

00:38:14.580 Don't we

00:38:15.040 have evidence

00:38:15.620 that Hillary

00:38:16.280 was actually

00:38:17.060 literally

00:38:17.560 afraid that

00:38:18.300 they would

00:38:18.540 all go

00:38:18.820 to jail?

00:38:20.480 Now,

00:38:21.060 if that

00:38:21.380 was the

00:38:21.680 case,

00:38:22.940 and if

00:38:23.960 I were

00:38:24.320 Hillary,

00:38:25.600 and I

00:38:25.940 was actually

00:38:26.780 believed I

00:38:27.720 might go

00:38:28.080 to jail

00:38:28.520 because of

00:38:30.480 my

00:38:30.660 competitor,

00:38:31.840 I would

00:38:32.320 make sure

00:38:33.260 that I

00:38:33.580 did everything

00:38:34.120 I could

00:38:34.500 do to

00:38:34.780 put him

00:38:35.040 in jail.

00:38:36.740 That would

00:38:37.340 be my

00:38:37.700 response.

00:38:38.720 And it

00:38:39.020 looks like

00:38:39.360 the Democrats

00:38:39.860 have this

00:38:40.520 full

00:38:42.960 intention

00:38:45.280 of putting

00:38:45.760 Trump in

00:38:46.220 jail any

00:38:46.840 way they

00:38:47.140 can.

00:38:48.040 So,

00:38:48.540 to me,

00:38:48.880 this is

00:38:49.140 just Hillary's

00:38:49.820 revenge.

00:38:51.200 It's just

00:38:51.840 working out

00:38:52.380 through the

00:38:52.960 Democratic

00:38:53.520 machine.

00:38:55.760 Yeah,

00:38:55.960 it's just

00:38:56.240 Hillary's

00:38:56.660 revenge.

00:38:58.520 So,

00:38:59.480 this would

00:39:00.240 suggest that

00:39:00.920 if Trump

00:39:01.400 becomes

00:39:01.760 president,

00:39:03.240 you'd

00:39:03.740 probably

00:39:04.020 try to

00:39:04.620 put Hillary

00:39:05.060 in jail

00:39:05.440 again.

00:39:07.800 Probably.

00:39:09.040 If there's

00:39:09.600 any reason

00:39:10.700 to do it.

00:39:12.220 But I

00:39:13.000 would be

00:39:13.300 just as

00:39:13.860 opposed.

00:39:15.320 All right,

00:39:15.640 Vivek Ramaswamy

00:39:16.680 played this

00:39:17.820 situation

00:39:18.400 the best.

00:39:20.500 He

00:39:20.940 immediately

00:39:22.220 and clearly

00:39:23.160 and loudly

00:39:23.920 said that

00:39:24.940 he would

00:39:25.300 pardon Trump

00:39:26.080 if he were

00:39:26.580 president.

00:39:28.520 That's

00:39:29.440 pretty clear.

00:39:30.560 But he

00:39:31.180 went further

00:39:31.820 and here's

00:39:32.840 the brilliant

00:39:33.240 part.

00:39:34.240 He said

00:39:34.660 he would

00:39:34.980 pardon

00:39:35.320 everybody

00:39:35.980 who's

00:39:36.340 politically

00:39:37.040 prosecuted.

00:39:39.480 So,

00:39:40.080 that would

00:39:40.260 include the

00:39:41.140 gentleman

00:39:41.880 who just

00:39:42.300 got prison

00:39:43.960 time for

00:39:44.580 a meme

00:39:45.060 about the

00:39:45.860 election.

00:39:46.920 I assume

00:39:47.760 it would

00:39:48.060 conclude

00:39:48.460 some

00:39:48.700 January 6

00:39:49.380 people.

00:39:50.460 And when

00:39:50.900 I heard

00:39:51.240 that,

00:39:51.580 I said

00:39:51.880 to myself,

00:39:52.720 that is

00:39:53.520 exactly

00:39:54.000 what I

00:39:54.400 wanted to

00:39:54.740 hear.

00:39:54.900 that is

00:39:56.280 exactly

00:39:56.860 what I

00:39:57.240 wanted to

00:39:57.540 hear.

00:39:58.420 That

00:39:58.600 somebody

00:39:59.060 would

00:39:59.340 try to

00:39:59.720 get,

00:40:01.160 in my

00:40:01.860 case,

00:40:02.460 what I

00:40:02.740 would call

00:40:03.840 overcharged

00:40:04.980 conservatives

00:40:08.180 out of

00:40:08.720 jail.

00:40:09.980 Because,

00:40:10.780 remember,

00:40:11.360 it's

00:40:11.600 especially

00:40:12.240 egregious

00:40:13.080 in the

00:40:13.860 context of

00:40:14.780 the

00:40:15.860 progressives

00:40:16.800 wanting to

00:40:17.420 have less

00:40:18.300 jail time

00:40:18.820 for everybody.

00:40:20.540 Really?

00:40:21.280 Less

00:40:21.660 jail time

00:40:22.380 for everybody

00:40:22.980 except the

00:40:24.320 president,

00:40:24.900 and political

00:40:27.640 people.

00:40:30.220 All right.

00:40:32.820 Rasmussen

00:40:33.420 did a poll

00:40:34.060 if Biden

00:40:35.060 versus Trump

00:40:35.920 ran.

00:40:36.780 Before I

00:40:37.220 tell you

00:40:37.560 the answer,

00:40:38.780 who do

00:40:39.060 you think

00:40:39.480 wins in

00:40:40.100 a matchup

00:40:40.600 between

00:40:40.920 Biden and

00:40:41.520 Trump if

00:40:42.120 it were

00:40:42.380 today?

00:40:44.540 Who do

00:40:45.160 you think

00:40:45.400 would win

00:40:45.860 Biden

00:40:46.280 versus

00:40:46.660 Trump

00:40:47.060 election

00:40:47.580 today?

00:40:48.880 No new

00:40:49.700 information,

00:40:50.620 election

00:40:51.180 today.

00:40:52.800 You're

00:40:53.040 saying

00:40:53.240 Trump.

00:40:53.620 see a lot

00:40:55.020 of

00:40:55.120 Trumps.

00:40:55.680 I think

00:40:56.040 that's

00:40:56.280 mostly

00:40:56.620 wishful

00:40:57.100 thinking.

00:40:58.360 However,

00:40:59.880 Rasmussen

00:41:00.320 poll

00:41:00.720 agrees with

00:41:01.360 you.

00:41:02.180 So there's

00:41:02.480 a new

00:41:02.660 Rasmussen

00:41:03.080 poll that

00:41:03.580 says if

00:41:03.940 the 2024

00:41:04.520 election

00:41:05.460 were between

00:41:06.780 Biden and

00:41:07.420 former

00:41:07.640 President

00:41:08.000 Trump,

00:41:08.620 47% of

00:41:10.080 likely U.S.

00:41:10.760 voters would

00:41:11.220 vote for

00:41:11.560 Trump,

00:41:12.080 while 40%

00:41:13.340 would vote

00:41:13.880 for Biden.

00:41:14.380 and that's

00:41:15.920 a pretty

00:41:16.440 big difference.

00:41:17.100 In

00:41:17.220 February,

00:41:18.400 Rasmussen

00:41:18.860 ran the

00:41:19.520 same poll,

00:41:21.000 and then

00:41:22.220 it was

00:41:22.620 45%

00:41:23.520 Biden,

00:41:24.220 42%

00:41:25.080 Trump.

00:41:26.660 That means

00:41:27.600 that Biden

00:41:28.460 lost five

00:41:29.020 points and

00:41:29.440 Trump gained

00:41:30.180 five points.

00:41:32.200 That's a

00:41:33.080 big margin.

00:41:35.300 Now,

00:41:35.880 I would not

00:41:36.660 expect this

00:41:37.280 to last,

00:41:38.680 because it's

00:41:39.360 way too

00:41:39.800 early.

00:41:40.120 the early

00:41:42.180 polls are

00:41:42.880 not that

00:41:43.660 predictive,

00:41:45.440 but it

00:41:46.460 does give

00:41:46.940 you a

00:41:47.400 sign of

00:41:47.880 the mood

00:41:48.460 of the

00:41:48.820 times.

00:41:50.960 So here's

00:41:52.580 the biggest

00:41:53.600 question that

00:41:54.280 people have

00:41:54.640 been asking

00:41:55.160 me lately.

00:41:56.680 Scott,

00:41:57.880 do you

00:41:58.460 really think

00:41:59.540 that Trump,

00:42:01.220 I mean

00:42:01.680 seriously,

00:42:02.300 Scott,

00:42:03.540 seriously,

00:42:04.700 you really

00:42:05.700 think that

00:42:06.260 Trump could

00:42:07.680 win in the

00:42:08.600 general election?

00:42:10.120 Really.

00:42:11.140 I get that

00:42:11.880 he could win

00:42:12.320 in the

00:42:12.520 primary,

00:42:13.160 because,

00:42:13.420 you know,

00:42:14.000 primaries are

00:42:14.720 unique,

00:42:15.800 but seriously,

00:42:17.060 Scott,

00:42:18.080 seriously,

00:42:18.940 you really

00:42:19.760 think that

00:42:20.240 Trump could

00:42:22.120 win a

00:42:22.600 general election

00:42:23.540 in 2024?

00:42:25.200 To which I

00:42:26.120 said,

00:42:26.780 it only matters

00:42:28.180 who he's

00:42:28.520 running against.

00:42:30.660 He's not

00:42:31.460 running by

00:42:33.100 himself.

00:42:34.560 He's not

00:42:35.320 running Trump

00:42:36.220 yes or no.

00:42:37.860 It's an

00:42:38.320 election against

00:42:39.000 another person.

00:42:40.120 If that

00:42:41.000 other person

00:42:41.600 is Biden,

00:42:43.160 yeah,

00:42:43.520 he could

00:42:43.800 win.

00:42:45.180 And then

00:42:45.520 people said,

00:42:46.240 but Biden

00:42:46.720 won last

00:42:47.320 time.

00:42:48.000 Yes,

00:42:48.480 last time

00:42:49.360 Biden had

00:42:50.140 not already

00:42:50.800 destroyed the

00:42:51.480 country.

00:42:53.200 Don't you

00:42:53.860 think that's

00:42:54.260 the difference?

00:42:55.900 Don't you

00:42:56.320 think that a

00:42:56.900 few years of

00:42:58.120 watching Biden

00:42:58.740 destroy the

00:42:59.380 country,

00:42:59.960 you don't

00:43:00.300 think that's

00:43:00.820 going to

00:43:01.060 change anyone's

00:43:02.380 mind?

00:43:03.220 We now have

00:43:04.120 a perfect

00:43:04.560 snapshot of

00:43:06.100 what a

00:43:06.540 Trump

00:43:06.860 administration

00:43:07.340 looks like

00:43:08.220 sort of

00:43:09.380 generically,

00:43:10.440 and a

00:43:11.000 perfect snapshot

00:43:11.780 of what a

00:43:12.260 Biden

00:43:12.460 administration

00:43:12.880 looks like

00:43:13.660 somewhat

00:43:14.540 generically.

00:43:16.340 It's a

00:43:17.080 completely

00:43:17.380 different race.

00:43:19.040 Before it

00:43:19.580 was unknowns,

00:43:21.760 right?

00:43:22.020 Before Trump

00:43:22.640 was in office,

00:43:23.420 you didn't

00:43:23.720 know.

00:43:24.820 It could have

00:43:25.340 been anything

00:43:25.820 that happened.

00:43:27.180 But now you

00:43:28.320 kind of know.

00:43:29.720 You kind of

00:43:30.320 know.

00:43:31.560 Now, here's the

00:43:32.540 question.

00:43:32.940 Would the

00:43:33.320 election be

00:43:33.900 so rigged

00:43:34.660 that Trump

00:43:36.660 couldn't win

00:43:37.260 if he had

00:43:37.680 that margin?

00:43:38.840 In my

00:43:39.480 opinion,

00:43:40.540 if the

00:43:40.900 polling,

00:43:41.300 let's say

00:43:41.680 the polling

00:43:42.560 maintained

00:43:43.100 this gap,

00:43:45.360 if the

00:43:45.740 polling,

00:43:46.660 if other

00:43:47.540 pollsters

00:43:48.100 agreed that

00:43:49.580 there was

00:43:49.880 this big

00:43:50.280 gap, you

00:43:51.280 can't cheat

00:43:51.760 that much.

00:43:53.080 That's too

00:43:53.540 much.

00:43:54.240 If it came

00:43:54.920 down to,

00:43:55.700 you know,

00:43:56.120 two counties,

00:43:57.900 yeah, you

00:43:59.500 could cheat.

00:44:00.580 You could

00:44:01.020 cheat in

00:44:01.620 two counties.

00:44:02.540 If that

00:44:03.100 was, you

00:44:03.620 know, the

00:44:03.920 difference.

00:44:04.520 But if it's

00:44:04.960 a 47 to

00:44:06.260 40 kind

00:44:07.220 of situation,

00:44:08.240 I just

00:44:09.680 don't think

00:44:10.080 you could

00:44:10.360 cheat that

00:44:10.960 much and

00:44:11.760 expect to

00:44:12.260 get away

00:44:12.580 with it.

00:44:13.980 Maybe.

00:44:15.180 But I don't

00:44:15.580 think so.

00:44:16.320 That would

00:44:16.560 be too

00:44:16.860 much.

00:44:18.020 So what

00:44:18.640 I expect

00:44:19.120 is that the

00:44:19.940 margins will

00:44:20.620 close before

00:44:21.440 election day,

00:44:22.420 it'll be

00:44:22.980 within 2%,

00:44:24.100 and then

00:44:24.620 anything's

00:44:25.140 possible.

00:44:26.660 In terms

00:44:27.360 of cheating,

00:44:27.940 anything would

00:44:28.400 be possible

00:44:28.980 once it

00:44:29.960 gets to be

00:44:30.420 a tight

00:44:30.880 election on

00:44:31.460 election day.

00:44:32.540 CNN fact

00:44:39.040 checked

00:44:39.420 Trump's

00:44:40.440 speech.

00:44:41.600 He had all

00:44:42.400 the usual

00:44:42.940 fact check

00:44:43.540 problems,

00:44:44.320 but they're

00:44:45.320 fact checking

00:44:45.840 the Soros

00:44:47.220 funding

00:44:48.660 connection.

00:44:49.300 now there's

00:44:55.100 no evidence

00:44:55.900 that they

00:44:56.360 cheated.

00:44:57.720 Let me

00:44:58.560 clarify.

00:45:00.120 What did

00:45:00.900 not happen

00:45:01.500 last time

00:45:02.180 is that

00:45:03.100 Trump went

00:45:03.560 into it

00:45:03.960 with a

00:45:04.240 huge margin

00:45:04.900 and then

00:45:05.900 the actual

00:45:06.460 election was

00:45:07.440 super close.

00:45:08.240 That didn't

00:45:08.660 happen last

00:45:09.180 time.

00:45:10.200 Do you get

00:45:11.700 that?

00:45:12.820 That didn't

00:45:13.580 happen last

00:45:14.160 time.

00:45:15.920 Right?

00:45:16.740 But this

00:45:17.420 time, it's

00:45:18.320 possible.

00:45:19.060 It's possible

00:45:19.600 that there

00:45:19.900 would be a

00:45:20.160 big gap

00:45:20.520 going into

00:45:20.920 the election.

00:45:22.100 You'd have

00:45:22.760 to have a

00:45:23.180 really big

00:45:23.680 gap to

00:45:25.080 make cheating

00:45:27.320 impossible.

00:45:28.900 You'd agree

00:45:29.560 with that,

00:45:29.980 right?

00:45:30.680 If the

00:45:31.300 polling is

00:45:31.820 just ridiculous,

00:45:33.480 cheating becomes

00:45:34.160 impractical at

00:45:34.940 that point.

00:45:37.280 Yeah.

00:45:39.140 So here's

00:45:40.000 what we

00:45:40.240 know about

00:45:40.880 Soros

00:45:42.100 funding.

00:45:43.260 So Soros

00:45:44.020 doesn't know

00:45:44.860 Bragg,

00:45:45.400 never met

00:45:45.940 him,

00:45:46.280 never recommended

00:45:47.040 him, but

00:45:47.920 he did give

00:45:48.480 money to a

00:45:50.060 political action

00:45:51.060 committee that

00:45:52.200 gave some of

00:45:52.940 that money,

00:45:53.920 $500,000,

00:45:55.340 to support

00:45:56.260 Bragg's

00:45:56.720 candidacy.

00:45:57.880 And we do

00:45:58.300 know that

00:45:58.760 Soros has

00:46:00.880 been involved

00:46:01.440 with funding

00:46:02.060 progressive

00:46:02.740 candidates.

00:46:04.000 So it's

00:46:05.500 not technically

00:46:06.340 true that

00:46:07.220 Soros hired

00:46:08.600 Bragg,

00:46:09.500 essentially.

00:46:10.340 It's more

00:46:11.220 true that

00:46:11.880 Soros does

00:46:12.600 things that

00:46:13.220 guarantees you

00:46:13.980 get a

00:46:14.980 Bragg.

00:46:18.100 Anthony

00:46:18.820 Sherman

00:46:19.240 asked this

00:46:19.840 question in

00:46:20.400 all caps.

00:46:21.880 May I

00:46:22.780 repeat his

00:46:23.340 question?

00:46:24.680 Anthony

00:46:25.020 asks in

00:46:26.100 all caps,

00:46:27.020 Scott,

00:46:27.800 aren't you

00:46:28.320 a fellow

00:46:28.760 Jew?

00:46:30.260 Anthony,

00:46:31.380 really?

00:46:32.840 We're going

00:46:33.180 to get rid

00:46:33.520 of you,

00:46:33.800 Anthony.

00:46:38.200 You know,

00:46:39.300 thank God

00:46:40.140 for caps.

00:46:41.380 If it

00:46:41.980 were not

00:46:42.280 for the

00:46:42.600 caps lock,

00:46:43.240 you could

00:46:43.620 not identify

00:46:44.440 the truly

00:46:45.200 broken people.

00:46:47.140 Why do

00:46:47.880 all the

00:46:48.300 broken people

00:46:49.060 signal,

00:46:50.500 I'm a

00:46:51.400 mental case,

00:46:52.960 and then

00:46:53.720 they say

00:46:54.080 their message

00:46:54.600 with the

00:46:55.900 all caps.

00:46:57.660 I'm a

00:46:58.400 total mental

00:46:59.020 case,

00:47:00.240 and now

00:47:00.840 here's my

00:47:01.280 message.

00:47:01.660 All

00:47:03.740 right.

00:47:04.640 So,

00:47:05.760 I guess

00:47:06.700 the CNN

00:47:07.340 fact-checking

00:47:08.300 is technically

00:47:09.260 correct,

00:47:11.380 that Soros

00:47:11.980 didn't

00:47:12.320 specifically

00:47:13.060 say he

00:47:13.800 funded this

00:47:14.280 one guy,

00:47:15.340 but it

00:47:16.820 looks like

00:47:17.660 the claim

00:47:18.220 is correct

00:47:18.960 enough.

00:47:20.060 You know,

00:47:20.380 if Soros

00:47:22.060 is giving

00:47:22.940 money that

00:47:24.160 he does

00:47:24.740 intend and

00:47:26.100 knows would

00:47:26.680 go to

00:47:27.100 progressive

00:47:27.820 prosecutors,

00:47:29.180 DAs,

00:47:31.700 and he

00:47:32.060 gets one,

00:47:33.080 and then

00:47:33.380 he gets

00:47:33.660 exactly what

00:47:34.300 you'd expect

00:47:34.780 from one,

00:47:36.580 I don't know,

00:47:37.200 I think the

00:47:37.640 charge is

00:47:38.180 true enough.

00:47:39.340 I'm going

00:47:39.660 to call it

00:47:40.060 true enough,

00:47:41.320 but technically

00:47:43.040 untrue.

00:47:45.160 All right,

00:47:45.500 CNN has an

00:47:46.180 editorial that

00:47:46.920 the word

00:47:47.320 woke is

00:47:48.800 being stolen

00:47:49.460 by largely

00:47:50.740 white people,

00:47:52.380 and really

00:47:53.140 it's a

00:47:53.460 black word.

00:47:55.960 Did you

00:47:56.600 know that?

00:47:57.000 the word

00:47:58.160 woke has

00:47:58.780 been used

00:47:59.320 by black

00:48:01.000 people for

00:48:01.600 a long

00:48:01.900 time in a

00:48:02.460 slightly

00:48:02.760 different way,

00:48:04.680 and I

00:48:05.560 think they

00:48:05.920 used it,

00:48:06.580 let's see,

00:48:07.400 I think they

00:48:07.820 used woke

00:48:08.440 to mean that

00:48:09.880 you were

00:48:10.480 asleep and

00:48:10.980 then you

00:48:11.240 woke up.

00:48:12.720 No,

00:48:13.020 I'm just

00:48:13.380 kidding.

00:48:14.260 They used

00:48:15.120 it to

00:48:15.380 basically

00:48:15.960 keep

00:48:17.480 alert,

00:48:18.780 stay

00:48:19.100 woke,

00:48:19.580 just meant

00:48:20.000 be alert,

00:48:21.280 look over

00:48:22.100 your shoulder.

00:48:24.900 And so

00:48:25.240 an editorial

00:48:28.880 commenter

00:48:29.960 said that

00:48:31.340 maybe the

00:48:31.740 white people

00:48:32.140 should stop

00:48:32.600 using that

00:48:33.060 word that

00:48:33.440 way.

00:48:35.300 They're

00:48:35.780 trying to

00:48:36.040 take your

00:48:36.380 word.

00:48:39.380 Yeah,

00:48:40.260 I think

00:48:41.480 that there's

00:48:42.100 obviously

00:48:42.820 some success

00:48:44.880 by the

00:48:45.500 right pushing

00:48:46.840 back against

00:48:47.620 wokeness,

00:48:48.300 because they

00:48:49.020 wouldn't try

00:48:49.520 to argue

00:48:49.920 that the

00:48:50.360 word doesn't

00:48:50.940 apply unless

00:48:51.880 the challenge

00:48:53.780 to that

00:48:55.100 body of

00:48:55.740 activities was

00:48:56.640 valid.

00:48:57.720 How many

00:48:58.440 times do

00:48:59.740 we end up

00:49:00.220 arguing over

00:49:00.920 the definition

00:49:01.980 of a word?

00:49:04.120 Let's see.

00:49:06.460 So,

00:49:07.380 Trump either

00:49:09.060 committed a

00:49:09.780 crime or he

00:49:10.420 didn't,

00:49:11.520 based on how

00:49:12.140 you define

00:49:12.680 the word

00:49:13.060 find.

00:49:14.680 If you

00:49:15.360 thought find

00:49:16.160 votes meant

00:49:17.620 pretend they

00:49:18.600 were there and

00:49:19.120 make them up,

00:49:20.240 he's a

00:49:20.580 criminal.

00:49:21.880 If you

00:49:22.280 think that

00:49:23.060 somebody who

00:49:23.700 complains that

00:49:24.380 the votes were

00:49:24.980 miscounted says

00:49:26.780 find votes,

00:49:28.280 it means,

00:49:28.920 oh,

00:49:29.160 count them

00:49:29.580 better or

00:49:30.220 make sure you

00:49:30.840 haven't missed

00:49:31.280 any.

00:49:32.960 We're really

00:49:33.680 just arguing

00:49:34.220 about what a

00:49:34.700 word means.

00:49:36.280 How about

00:49:36.800 what does

00:49:40.060 Soros-funded

00:49:41.020 mean?

00:49:41.680 I mean,

00:49:41.920 that's what the

00:49:42.360 conversation is.

00:49:43.860 Does Soros-funded

00:49:45.020 mean directly or

00:49:46.520 does indirectly

00:49:47.180 count?

00:49:47.940 What does

00:49:48.440 woke mean?

00:49:49.680 Now we're

00:49:50.040 arguing what

00:49:50.600 woke means.

00:49:51.200 Now we're

00:49:52.120 arguing what

00:49:52.600 a woman

00:49:52.920 is.

00:49:54.060 So we

00:49:54.680 can't decide

00:49:55.220 what a

00:49:55.560 woman is,

00:49:56.260 what the

00:49:56.580 word woke

00:49:57.080 means,

00:49:57.840 what Soros-funded

00:49:58.980 means,

00:50:00.100 what the

00:50:00.520 word find

00:50:01.220 means.

00:50:06.760 So I talk

00:50:07.600 about word

00:50:08.180 thinking all

00:50:08.800 the time,

00:50:09.700 which, by the

00:50:10.360 way, you're

00:50:10.720 going to

00:50:10.880 understand a

00:50:11.440 lot better

00:50:11.780 because AI

00:50:12.480 is a word

00:50:13.280 thinker.

00:50:13.700 the way

00:50:15.020 AI thinks

00:50:16.060 is by

00:50:16.820 figuring out

00:50:17.380 the most

00:50:17.740 predictive

00:50:18.200 word that

00:50:18.800 would follow

00:50:19.260 the next

00:50:19.720 sequence

00:50:20.280 that's already

00:50:21.180 there,

00:50:22.100 which is

00:50:23.320 basically

00:50:23.800 thinking by

00:50:24.980 words.

00:50:25.720 If the

00:50:26.260 sentence makes

00:50:26.980 sense, AI

00:50:28.040 thinks it

00:50:28.560 makes sense.

00:50:30.240 That's what

00:50:30.900 people do.

00:50:32.080 When the

00:50:32.480 sentence makes

00:50:33.240 sense, people

00:50:33.940 think that they've

00:50:34.620 talked logic.

00:50:36.040 And you see

00:50:36.540 that all the

00:50:37.020 time.

00:50:37.940 There's a whole

00:50:38.740 group of

00:50:40.400 people in

00:50:40.780 the country

00:50:41.200 who, let's

00:50:42.600 say, would

00:50:43.040 be more

00:50:43.640 close to

00:50:44.280 the artistic

00:50:45.040 side of

00:50:46.960 things than

00:50:47.500 the engineering

00:50:48.140 side of

00:50:48.580 things.

00:50:50.100 The artistic

00:50:51.180 people think

00:50:51.860 that if the

00:50:52.420 sentence makes

00:50:53.200 sense, the

00:50:54.640 idea makes

00:50:55.360 sense.

00:50:56.420 It does

00:50:56.840 not.

00:50:58.340 It does

00:50:59.000 not.

00:50:59.920 It's just a

00:51:00.600 sentence that

00:51:01.860 could be

00:51:02.260 understood.

00:51:03.500 If the

00:51:03.920 sentence could

00:51:04.480 be understood,

00:51:05.140 you didn't

00:51:05.420 make a point.

00:51:06.740 You just

00:51:07.140 said a

00:51:07.480 sentence that

00:51:08.020 could be

00:51:08.280 understood.

00:51:09.120 And they

00:51:09.520 can't tell

00:51:09.940 the difference.

00:51:11.000 They actually

00:51:11.520 can't tell

00:51:11.960 the difference.

00:51:13.200 An engineer

00:51:13.820 can tell

00:51:14.220 the difference.

00:51:15.100 Oh, the

00:51:15.480 sentence makes

00:51:16.140 sense, but

00:51:17.520 the idea

00:51:18.260 doesn't.

00:51:20.620 Yeah, you

00:51:21.000 see it all

00:51:21.340 the time.

00:51:22.740 All right.

00:51:24.020 Here's my

00:51:25.680 last AI

00:51:26.360 story.

00:51:27.940 I believe

00:51:28.440 that copyrights

00:51:29.640 will become

00:51:30.740 worthless because

00:51:31.780 of AI.

00:51:33.280 Here's why.

00:51:35.520 If in the

00:51:36.340 current model,

00:51:37.040 I say, I

00:51:37.640 would like this

00:51:38.200 book by

00:51:38.900 Scott.

00:51:40.720 So you'd

00:51:41.340 say, oh, I

00:51:42.460 guess I

00:51:42.740 got to buy

00:51:43.100 it because

00:51:43.400 it's copyrighted.

00:51:44.280 So you buy

00:51:44.700 it.

00:51:46.140 In the AI

00:51:46.940 world, here's

00:51:48.200 what you're

00:51:48.520 going to say.

00:51:49.780 I'd like a

00:51:50.580 book by Scott.

00:51:51.640 Hey, AI, can

00:51:52.400 you go read

00:51:52.880 that book and

00:51:53.520 summarize it for

00:51:54.920 me?

00:51:55.580 Or just read

00:51:56.400 it to me in

00:51:57.360 your own words.

00:51:59.060 Is that a

00:51:59.720 copyright problem?

00:52:01.720 Maybe.

00:52:02.620 But how would

00:52:03.140 you ever know?

00:52:03.720 If you told

00:52:05.500 AI to go read

00:52:06.400 a book and

00:52:07.320 then read it

00:52:07.880 to you like

00:52:08.380 it was reading

00:52:08.880 an audio

00:52:09.260 book to

00:52:09.680 you, who

00:52:10.480 would know

00:52:10.840 besides you?

00:52:13.020 Nobody would

00:52:13.660 know.

00:52:15.340 You could

00:52:15.980 turn any

00:52:16.440 book into

00:52:16.880 an audio

00:52:17.280 book just

00:52:18.680 by telling

00:52:19.140 AI to read

00:52:19.800 it to you.

00:52:20.860 If AI can

00:52:21.940 see it, and

00:52:23.680 every book

00:52:24.640 will be

00:52:25.280 digitized,

00:52:26.020 right?

00:52:26.280 Every book

00:52:26.780 will be

00:52:27.140 digitized.

00:52:28.180 And every

00:52:28.700 book will be

00:52:29.540 illegally

00:52:30.220 available

00:52:31.500 somewhere.

00:52:32.980 Somewhere it

00:52:33.860 will be

00:52:34.100 illegally

00:52:34.520 available,

00:52:35.260 even if

00:52:35.680 copyrighted.

00:52:37.040 So copyrights

00:52:38.440 will be

00:52:38.780 absolutely

00:52:39.340 useless.

00:52:40.420 Let's say

00:52:40.940 there's a

00:52:41.360 movie that

00:52:43.480 AI could

00:52:44.480 have access

00:52:44.980 to but you

00:52:45.740 haven't seen.

00:52:46.820 You don't

00:52:47.140 think AI

00:52:47.740 could just

00:52:48.200 reproduce the

00:52:48.880 movie for

00:52:49.380 you?

00:52:50.260 It might

00:52:50.560 not be

00:52:50.900 exactly the

00:52:51.500 same, but

00:52:52.500 if AI has

00:52:53.240 watched the

00:52:53.740 movie or

00:52:54.620 it has

00:52:54.920 access to

00:52:55.500 it, it

00:52:56.480 could go

00:52:56.780 get it.

00:52:57.700 Or how

00:52:58.260 about this?

00:52:59.340 You say

00:52:59.720 to AI,

00:53:00.400 AI,

00:53:01.500 I'd like

00:53:01.940 you to

00:53:02.400 give me

00:53:02.660 a new

00:53:02.980 Marvel

00:53:03.480 superhero

00:53:04.320 movie.

00:53:05.240 Make it

00:53:05.620 unique,

00:53:06.500 put it

00:53:06.860 in the

00:53:07.220 style of

00:53:07.960 maybe I

00:53:08.420 mentioned

00:53:08.700 a writer,

00:53:09.400 a writer,

00:53:10.100 a producer,

00:53:10.680 put it in

00:53:11.500 the style of

00:53:12.040 this producer

00:53:12.680 and this

00:53:13.200 writer,

00:53:14.120 make it

00:53:14.620 new content.

00:53:15.480 I like

00:53:15.780 a little

00:53:16.040 more focus

00:53:16.740 on Captain

00:53:18.800 America.

00:53:19.700 I like

00:53:19.960 him featured

00:53:20.420 a little bit

00:53:20.900 more.

00:53:22.020 And can

00:53:22.300 you replace

00:53:23.040 Iron Man

00:53:25.560 with, you

00:53:25.960 know,

00:53:26.400 and then you

00:53:27.280 would watch

00:53:27.680 an entire

00:53:28.320 two and a

00:53:29.080 half hour

00:53:29.460 movie,

00:53:30.580 fully scripted,

00:53:31.480 fully scripted.

00:53:35.140 And it

00:53:35.700 could be as

00:53:36.180 good as

00:53:36.740 or better

00:53:37.220 than the

00:53:37.660 ones that

00:53:38.120 Hollywood

00:53:38.420 made.

00:53:39.340 You know

00:53:39.640 why it

00:53:39.920 could be

00:53:40.200 better?

00:53:41.060 Because you

00:53:41.520 could say

00:53:41.920 don't make

00:53:42.480 it woke

00:53:42.960 or whatever

00:53:43.920 words you

00:53:44.500 need for

00:53:44.800 AI.

00:53:45.600 Don't make

00:53:46.080 it woke,

00:53:46.900 make it

00:53:47.280 more realistic.

00:53:48.840 And then

00:53:49.080 suddenly you

00:53:50.280 could have

00:53:50.560 a movie

00:53:50.920 without the

00:53:51.460 wokeness.

00:53:52.340 Or how

00:53:52.700 about this?

00:53:53.780 Let's say

00:53:54.180 you bought

00:53:54.560 a movie so

00:53:55.220 it's available

00:53:55.800 to you,

00:53:56.340 you own it.

00:53:57.360 So you

00:53:57.700 say,

00:53:57.980 AI,

00:53:58.960 can you

00:53:59.300 take the

00:53:59.700 wokeness

00:54:00.160 out of

00:54:00.400 this movie?

00:54:01.180 Just remove

00:54:01.800 all the

00:54:02.100 woke parts.

00:54:03.140 And then it

00:54:03.540 just gives

00:54:03.900 you back

00:54:04.200 the movie

00:54:04.580 without the

00:54:05.080 woke parts.

00:54:06.560 Yeah,

00:54:07.180 that's going

00:54:07.560 to happen.

00:54:08.400 So I

00:54:09.080 don't see

00:54:09.500 any,

00:54:10.220 I can't

00:54:10.720 see any

00:54:11.280 world in

00:54:12.100 which copyrights

00:54:13.000 can last

00:54:13.580 more than

00:54:13.960 the next

00:54:14.240 few years.

00:54:15.260 Would you

00:54:15.740 disagree?

00:54:16.040 It might be

00:54:18.120 that some

00:54:18.540 things are

00:54:18.920 still copyrighted,

00:54:20.740 but AI

00:54:21.340 could so

00:54:22.060 easily imitate

00:54:23.060 them or

00:54:24.360 steal them

00:54:25.980 without anybody

00:54:26.700 knowing that

00:54:27.980 it would have

00:54:29.240 no value.

00:54:30.220 You wouldn't

00:54:30.500 be able to,

00:54:32.920 there's just

00:54:33.760 no way you'd

00:54:34.280 be able to

00:54:34.940 detect it

00:54:35.740 and enforce

00:54:38.000 it.

00:54:39.060 So I think

00:54:39.800 that my job

00:54:41.140 probably only

00:54:41.800 has two

00:54:44.920 to three

00:54:45.340 years left.

00:54:47.620 You know,

00:54:47.920 my job.

00:54:48.700 So at the

00:54:49.140 moment,

00:54:49.880 AI can't

00:54:50.500 write humor.

00:54:51.800 Some people

00:54:52.320 say it did

00:54:53.280 some funny

00:54:53.720 things,

00:54:54.020 but it

00:54:54.300 really

00:54:54.480 didn't.

00:54:55.620 The one

00:54:56.040 reason that

00:54:56.580 I can

00:54:56.880 still write

00:54:57.500 humor better

00:54:58.060 than AI

00:54:58.740 is that I

00:55:00.400 haven't taught

00:55:00.960 AI how to

00:55:01.500 write humor

00:55:01.920 yet.

00:55:02.980 If I do,

00:55:04.920 it could

00:55:05.480 probably beat

00:55:06.120 me pretty

00:55:06.540 quickly,

00:55:07.380 but it

00:55:08.020 doesn't know

00:55:08.460 the formula.

00:55:10.120 The only

00:55:10.880 person who

00:55:11.360 knows the

00:55:11.700 formula is

00:55:12.160 me,

00:55:13.200 because I

00:55:13.660 wrote a

00:55:14.900 formula,

00:55:15.340 the six

00:55:15.900 dimensions

00:55:16.300 of humor,

00:55:17.180 and if

00:55:17.440 you use

00:55:17.740 that formula

00:55:18.300 or you

00:55:18.920 teach,

00:55:19.520 if you

00:55:19.900 taught AI

00:55:20.600 what that

00:55:21.100 formula was,

00:55:22.480 it could

00:55:22.860 write jokes

00:55:23.380 pretty

00:55:24.160 quickly.

00:55:25.380 But there's

00:55:26.060 one thing

00:55:26.480 it can't

00:55:26.920 do,

00:55:28.200 which you

00:55:28.580 can't judge

00:55:29.400 whether its

00:55:30.340 joke is

00:55:30.820 funny.

00:55:32.320 That's

00:55:32.800 something I

00:55:33.220 can still

00:55:33.680 do that the

00:55:34.220 computer can't

00:55:34.920 do.

00:55:35.660 So if I'm

00:55:36.180 writing a

00:55:36.620 joke and I

00:55:37.820 get to my

00:55:38.440 final punchline

00:55:39.800 and I look at

00:55:40.520 it and go,

00:55:41.400 eh, it

00:55:42.700 doesn't make

00:55:43.120 me laugh,

00:55:44.320 so I don't

00:55:44.720 think it'll

00:55:45.040 make you

00:55:45.380 laugh.

00:55:45.720 So I

00:55:46.460 erase it,

00:55:47.340 try something

00:55:47.820 else, try

00:55:48.840 something else,

00:55:49.980 try something

00:55:50.600 else, and

00:55:51.180 then I

00:55:51.460 laugh.

00:55:52.260 I literally

00:55:52.700 laugh at

00:55:53.240 it.

00:55:53.560 Oh, that's

00:55:54.600 good.

00:55:55.580 Then I

00:55:56.060 know you're

00:55:56.460 going to

00:55:56.660 laugh too.

00:55:57.680 The computer

00:55:58.320 can't do

00:55:58.760 that yet.

00:55:59.980 But it

00:56:00.440 will.

00:56:01.860 Certainly

00:56:02.300 it will.

00:56:03.400 All it

00:56:03.960 would need

00:56:04.400 is a huge

00:56:05.280 body of

00:56:06.140 jokes, and

00:56:07.860 it would

00:56:08.140 need to

00:56:08.520 rank them

00:56:09.060 by how

00:56:09.480 much humans

00:56:10.120 actually laughed

00:56:10.880 at each

00:56:11.240 joke, and

00:56:12.320 then it

00:56:12.600 would know

00:56:12.920 what kinds

00:56:13.540 of patterns

00:56:14.220 make people

00:56:14.880 laugh.

00:56:15.780 And then

00:56:16.500 with the

00:56:17.100 six dimensions

00:56:17.700 of humor,

00:56:18.820 it could

00:56:19.300 create its

00:56:19.840 own potential

00:56:21.160 jokes, and

00:56:22.560 then once it

00:56:23.080 created it, it

00:56:23.800 could bash it

00:56:24.360 against its

00:56:24.900 database of

00:56:26.400 patterns that

00:56:27.140 actually worked

00:56:27.940 for human

00:56:28.560 beings, and

00:56:30.700 it could write

00:56:31.120 jokes.

00:56:32.500 It can't be

00:56:33.280 more than a

00:56:33.780 year away.

00:56:35.440 So I think

00:56:36.140 my job is

00:56:36.820 obsolete pretty

00:56:38.080 soon.

00:56:39.220 That's what I

00:56:39.920 think.

00:56:41.700 So here's

00:56:43.320 another

00:56:43.600 surprise for

00:56:44.440 you.

00:56:46.280 Do you

00:56:46.740 like

00:56:46.940 audiobooks, and

00:56:47.840 you like

00:56:48.180 them when

00:56:48.440 the author

00:56:48.880 reads them,

00:56:49.440 right?

00:56:50.160 Well, here's

00:56:50.800 something you

00:56:51.300 maybe didn't

00:56:52.100 know.

00:56:53.160 There are a

00:56:53.660 few things

00:56:54.200 that an

00:56:54.560 author hates

00:56:55.460 more than

00:56:57.840 recording an

00:56:58.540 audiobook.

00:56:59.860 It is

00:57:00.540 really, really

00:57:01.360 unpleasant.

00:57:02.100 It's the

00:57:02.380 thing I hate

00:57:02.880 more than

00:57:03.240 anything I

00:57:04.000 do.

00:57:05.220 Anything,

00:57:06.020 actually.

00:57:07.380 Literally

00:57:07.820 anything.

00:57:08.460 It's the

00:57:08.860 most hated

00:57:09.380 thing I

00:57:09.780 do.

00:57:10.300 It's like

00:57:10.680 three days

00:57:11.360 of just, or

00:57:12.580 four days

00:57:13.200 of hell

00:57:14.520 just talking

00:57:16.180 into a

00:57:16.540 microphone and

00:57:17.440 trying to

00:57:18.240 get every

00:57:18.600 word right

00:57:19.300 and thinking

00:57:20.040 and concentrating

00:57:20.720 too hard.

00:57:21.300 It's terrible.

00:57:22.440 Do you

00:57:22.740 know what I

00:57:23.300 could do

00:57:23.700 now?

00:57:24.800 I could use

00:57:25.780 one of

00:57:26.580 several AI

00:57:27.420 products that

00:57:28.180 already exist.

00:57:29.760 I can feed

00:57:30.440 it the text

00:57:31.060 of my book,

00:57:31.900 and it will

00:57:32.820 read it in

00:57:33.840 a perfect

00:57:34.500 impression of

00:57:35.340 me.

00:57:35.780 of me.

00:57:40.000 It would

00:57:40.720 be irrational

00:57:41.980 for me to

00:57:42.640 ever record

00:57:43.360 an audiobook

00:57:43.860 again.

00:57:45.480 I'm never

00:57:46.140 going to

00:57:46.420 do it.

00:57:47.900 There will

00:57:48.580 be audiobooks

00:57:49.360 of mine,

00:57:49.740 but I'm

00:57:50.000 never going

00:57:50.340 to record

00:57:50.700 one again.

00:57:51.300 It wouldn't

00:57:51.620 make sense.

00:57:53.080 Because the

00:57:53.860 computer can

00:57:54.560 actually just

00:57:55.120 do a better

00:57:55.540 job of

00:57:56.040 me than

00:57:57.460 I can do

00:57:58.300 of me.

00:57:59.760 Because if

00:58:00.460 they can

00:58:01.060 match me

00:58:01.720 for a

00:58:03.580 sentence or

00:58:04.160 two,

00:58:04.400 then it

00:58:05.660 can perfectly

00:58:06.360 match me

00:58:06.920 for the

00:58:07.420 whole book.

00:58:08.420 And it

00:58:08.660 can certainly

00:58:09.200 match me

00:58:09.680 for a

00:58:10.500 paragraph or

00:58:10.980 two.

00:58:12.480 But if I

00:58:13.380 do it

00:58:13.640 myself,

00:58:14.900 I can

00:58:15.320 also perfectly

00:58:16.180 match myself

00:58:16.960 for a

00:58:17.280 paragraph,

00:58:18.100 but my

00:58:18.720 voice starts

00:58:19.300 wearing out

00:58:19.940 and my

00:58:20.260 energy gets

00:58:20.840 lower as

00:58:21.480 I record.

00:58:22.540 So I

00:58:23.220 would never

00:58:23.720 be able to

00:58:24.320 record as

00:58:24.940 well as

00:58:25.500 AI can

00:58:26.340 already

00:58:27.060 imitate my

00:58:29.380 voice.

00:58:30.780 AI already

00:58:31.880 speaks to

00:58:32.700 Scott better

00:58:33.540 than Scott

00:58:34.060 does.

00:58:34.540 A lot

00:58:34.800 better.

00:58:35.680 For long

00:58:36.760 form, a

00:58:37.580 lot better.

00:58:38.040 It's not

00:58:38.220 even close.

00:58:41.500 Imperfections

00:58:41.980 need to be

00:58:42.460 built in?

00:58:43.040 Maybe.

00:58:44.580 Maybe.

00:58:45.680 Imperfections

00:58:46.180 don't need to

00:58:46.780 be built in

00:58:47.300 when you

00:58:47.620 buy a

00:58:48.280 form of

00:58:49.540 music.

00:58:50.520 If you

00:58:50.960 go to a

00:58:51.340 concert,

00:58:52.360 there's

00:58:52.600 imperfection

00:58:53.260 in the

00:58:53.540 performance.

00:58:54.640 If you

00:58:55.240 buy the

00:58:56.720 streaming

00:58:57.600 music that

00:58:58.940 was made

00:58:59.340 in a

00:58:59.800 studio,

00:59:00.900 studio,

00:59:03.000 the studio

00:59:03.040 players are

00:59:11.920 sometimes

00:59:12.380 fairly often

00:59:14.020 not even

00:59:15.080 the artists

00:59:15.600 who made

00:59:16.160 the album

00:59:16.760 because the

00:59:18.140 artists who

00:59:18.640 play it live

00:59:19.380 have a real

00:59:21.060 tough time

00:59:21.840 playing it

00:59:22.280 perfectly.

00:59:22.680 and nobody

00:59:24.020 cares if it's

00:59:24.660 live.

00:59:24.980 But for a

00:59:26.640 studio album,

00:59:28.420 you need

00:59:29.040 professional

00:59:30.040 musicians to

00:59:31.600 pretend to be

00:59:32.360 the people who

00:59:32.940 made the

00:59:33.280 album because

00:59:34.220 they can play

00:59:34.680 it perfectly.

00:59:35.160 so it's

00:59:37.140 going to be

00:59:37.400 like that.

00:59:38.880 AI will be

00:59:39.900 your long

00:59:40.840 form speaker.

00:59:45.680 And then

00:59:46.640 certainly for

00:59:48.380 humans doing

00:59:49.740 anything like

00:59:50.360 this, we'll

00:59:51.440 have makeup

00:59:52.040 applied by a

00:59:53.740 filter.

00:59:54.880 Isn't it weird

00:59:55.480 that Zoom

00:59:56.020 doesn't already

00:59:56.560 have a makeup

00:59:57.120 filter?

00:59:58.360 Isn't that the

00:59:58.900 most obvious

00:59:59.600 thing Zoom

01:00:00.200 should have?

01:00:01.700 Where I just

01:00:02.140 hit a button

01:00:02.580 and I've got

01:00:03.340 full makeup

01:00:04.800 on?

01:00:06.140 Yeah.

01:00:08.060 All right.

01:00:11.820 Maybe I am

01:00:12.780 AI already.

01:00:17.060 All right.

01:00:17.840 Has anybody

01:00:18.300 used my

01:00:19.480 insult yet

01:00:20.200 that something

01:00:21.060 is GPT-1

01:00:22.300 quality?

01:00:24.200 I told the

01:00:25.160 locals people

01:00:25.800 this.

01:00:26.120 This is our

01:00:26.560 new insult.

01:00:27.300 I'll tell the

01:00:27.900 people on

01:00:28.600 YouTube.

01:00:29.440 If you see

01:00:30.320 somebody who's

01:00:30.860 just being

01:00:31.260 dumb,

01:00:32.720 a good

01:00:33.320 insult that's

01:00:34.800 very timely

01:00:35.380 is, yeah,

01:00:36.580 that's some

01:00:37.500 GPT-1 stuff

01:00:39.640 right there.

01:00:41.240 Yeah,

01:00:41.540 come back to

01:00:42.780 me when you

01:00:43.220 can get up

01:00:43.720 to GPT-2

01:00:45.020 and I'll

01:00:46.200 listen to you.

01:00:47.200 GPT-3, I

01:00:48.420 might be

01:00:48.760 interested.

01:00:49.820 GPT-4, I

01:00:50.920 might even

01:00:51.320 believe you.

01:00:52.460 But GPT-1,

01:00:53.680 no, not so

01:00:54.780 much.

01:00:57.960 All right.

01:00:58.620 Yeah, that's

01:00:59.520 a GPT-1

01:01:00.400 quality

01:01:00.820 performance.

01:01:01.720 That's

01:01:01.780 combining all

01:01:03.460 the insults.

01:01:05.140 All right.

01:01:06.820 Ladies and

01:01:07.620 gentlemen,

01:01:11.220 this

01:01:12.040 completes my

01:01:14.040 presentation and

01:01:15.000 YouTube, thanks

01:01:15.820 for joining.

01:01:17.060 I'll talk to

01:01:17.660 you tomorrow.

01:01:19.880 I'll be

01:01:20.400 doing

01:01:20.540 Without

01:01:20.920 shadow.

01:01:23.300 You

01:01:24.080 may

01:01:36.900 not

01:01:37.600 옛날

01:01:38.460 and

01:01:39.360 I

01:01:39.640 may

01:01:39.800 may

01:01:40.560 who

01:01:41.620 may

01:01:41.960 know.

01:01:42.660 You

01:01:43.560 may

01:01:44.640 or you

01:01:44.920 may

01:01:45.660 may

01:01:46.760 act

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - April 05, 2023

Episode 2069 Scott Adams： Trump Arraignment, AI Rewrites History More Woke, Escape Cities

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript