Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2069 Scott Adams： Trump Arraignment, AI Rewrites History More Woke, Escape Cities

00:00:00.120 Civilization, it's called Coffee with Scott Adams, today with better lighting, maybe a

00:00:05.640 little too bright, we'll fix that later, but if you'd like to take your experience up to

00:00:12.080 levels that have never been known before, an enjoyment which you could only imagine until

00:00:17.860 now, all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass.

00:00:22.060 So I lost my little cheat note of what I say before the show, but that's okay because

00:00:34.700 it's written on my mug, except the first word is missing on my mug, and I don't remember

00:00:42.340 what it was, probably a cup or a mug or a flask, a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or

00:00:55.260 a cellist or a stein, a canteen jug or a flask if that's of any kind, man, when you lose

00:01:04.140 it in the first second of a live stream, it will never come back, let me tell you something

00:01:10.720 about presentations, the first minute decides how the entire thing goes.

00:01:16.560 Like if the first minute goes really well, everything goes well after that, but when

00:01:21.740 it goes this way instead, there's not a chance that this will be good.

00:01:27.280 We're off to the wrong foot, but still, we're going to have the simultaneous sip, and we're

00:01:33.160 going to try to recover from here, because do we quit?

00:01:35.900 No, we do not quit.

00:01:38.540 We push forward.

00:01:40.680 Go.

00:01:44.680 I can't believe I picked the one mug out of my cupboard that had the missing words.

00:01:52.000 Oh, no.

00:01:53.800 Well, how many of you watched the Trump arraignment?

00:01:58.940 We'll talk about that.

00:02:00.140 I'm going to do a few short stories before that, because people pour in.

00:02:05.400 They'll be pouring in to get my comments on this.

00:02:09.520 Well, the funniest thing that happened, I guess yesterday, was that Twitter labeled NPR,

00:02:16.000 state-affiliated media, on Twitter.

00:02:18.580 So, Twitter likes to tag any propaganda sites from other countries.

00:02:26.540 So, if there's a Chinese state-affiliated person, they'll put that right in the bio so

00:02:31.400 you can't miss it.

00:02:33.340 So, something like RT Russia Today might have that little warning.

00:02:39.080 Well, Musk started putting that, or Twitter did, started putting that on NPR, state-affiliated

00:02:46.980 media.

00:02:47.360 In other words, you're supposed to not believe their news.

00:02:52.300 Twitter actually has a permanent label on NPR that it's not to be believed.

00:03:01.280 What do you say about that?

00:03:03.980 And then, of course, he got some pushback, and Musk just took the definition of state-supported

00:03:12.360 media and published it and said, that looks about right.

00:03:15.280 Now, there was some pushback.

00:03:19.460 Somebody said that only 2% of NPR's funding comes from the government.

00:03:24.660 Does that sound right to you?

00:03:26.960 Does it sound like only 2% of their funding comes from the government?

00:03:31.360 No, that sounds like a lie, doesn't it?

00:03:33.100 I mean, it's something I saw on Twitter, but it looked like somebody who knew what they

00:03:38.260 were talking about, but it can't be real, could it?

00:03:40.980 If it were 2%, it probably would have gone to zero.

00:03:44.260 That's my theory.

00:03:45.120 If it ever got down to 2%, probably the public would have said, wouldn't it be better at

00:03:51.340 zero?

00:03:52.120 I mean, is that 2% really making all the difference?

00:03:55.280 Wouldn't it be better for the government just to be out of that business?

00:03:59.020 Yeah.

00:03:59.300 I've got a feeling it's more than 2%.

00:04:01.020 Oh, somebody says 100% of the news.

00:04:06.240 I don't know about that, but that's a claim I'm seeing there.

00:04:10.580 Well, I just think it's hilarious.

00:04:12.560 It may be a little overstated, but not much.

00:04:15.520 It makes me wonder, why would NBC not be considered state-affiliated media?

00:04:23.240 It's not just because they're funded, right?

00:04:28.820 Isn't NBC the one that Glenn Greenwald always says the CIA basically controls them?

00:04:38.520 Or at least controls some stories that they publish.

00:04:43.480 Wouldn't it be perfectly accurate for Twitter to call NBC a state-affiliated media?

00:04:51.460 Or MSNBC?

00:04:53.240 I don't know.

00:04:55.100 Well, I guess you'd have to prove it, so that might be the problem.

00:04:59.120 Babylon Bee had, as it often does, the best comment on everything.

00:05:05.280 You know, we keep talking about kids being sexualized by all the trans-related information

00:05:13.740 and events.

00:05:16.180 And, you know, people are getting all worked up.

00:05:18.200 Oh, those children, those children are getting sexualized. 1.00

00:05:22.040 And then the Babylon Bee says, we need to protect our kids from inappropriate teaching on sex. 0.99

00:05:28.600 Say parents who let their kids have a smartphone.

00:05:30.840 Oh.

00:05:31.840 Oh.

00:05:32.840 Oh, yeah.

00:05:33.840 Oh, yeah.

00:05:34.840 Oh, yeah.

00:05:35.840 Oh, yeah.

00:05:36.840 Yeah, yeah.

00:05:37.840 That's a good point.

00:05:39.840 That's a good point.

00:05:42.020 Now, the smartphone usually doesn't kick in until, what's the common age today?

00:05:48.240 11 or 12?

00:05:49.940 That's when the kid gets the smartphone.

00:05:51.340 But the kids are being taught stuff at age six, right?

00:05:58.060 Six and seven.

00:05:58.880 So, you know, the Babylon Bee, I just saw a terrible meme.

00:06:07.600 The Babylon Bee isn't exactly accurate, but it's, in terms of humor, it's perfect.

00:06:14.940 Yeah, you know, we do just give away our upbringing of our kids.

00:06:20.440 All right.

00:06:20.620 You want to, here's the first AI-related story.

00:06:24.020 I've got a feeling all the stories will be AI in the future, don't you?

00:06:29.380 At least until I'm replaced by AI.

00:06:31.720 I'll just be talking about it until that's all it is.

00:06:35.580 But one of the stories is, suppose you had an AI step-parent, an AI step-parent, and you

00:06:47.200 put that personality into a kid's phone so the kid couldn't get rid of it.

00:06:52.120 And then the AI on the phone simply monitors the kid without your knowledge.

00:06:59.280 So, in other words, the parents might be unaware of what the kid is looking at, but not the

00:07:04.040 AI that's built into their phone.

00:07:06.440 So, the AI that's in the phone would say, when you put in that naughty URL, the AI in

00:07:12.040 the phone would say, Billy, I don't think that's good for you.

00:07:16.500 Would you like to see something on Instagram instead?

00:07:25.420 Well, think about it.

00:07:27.200 AI, tell me if I'm wrong, could AI not tell what was inappropriate content every time?

00:07:35.300 I think it could.

00:07:36.940 I think it could identify inappropriate content every time.

00:07:40.040 So, you wouldn't have to worry about censoring your kid's phone.

00:07:43.980 You'd just put the AI parent on there, and the AI virtual parent would just say, no, Billy.

00:07:49.860 Billy, do not look at that website.

00:07:51.580 I'm going to block that for you.

00:07:53.260 Maybe you should look at something about nutrition instead.

00:07:56.940 Right?

00:07:57.620 And what about an AI that takes over for the algorithm?

00:08:00.560 Do you think AI could game the algorithms on behalf of the user so that it would start

00:08:08.300 giving them wholesome and, you know, affirming kinds of content?

00:08:14.780 Because if you could get the AI to select things on your behalf, it could game the algorithm

00:08:21.160 by selecting things when you're not there.

00:08:23.940 And then after it's selected enough things while you're not there, the algorithm at the

00:08:28.680 social media would be trained to give you more of what your AI had trained it to give

00:08:33.740 you, which would be a whole bunch of positive things, maybe.

00:08:38.180 Anyway, but if you're worried about censorship and phones, I think AI is going to be all of

00:08:44.720 that.

00:08:46.300 Why wouldn't it be?

00:08:47.900 Can you think of any reason why it wouldn't go in that direction?

00:08:51.560 That's the most valuable.

00:08:53.900 Well, I would say it might be the most valuable application of AI, except for maybe figuring

00:09:02.000 out how to do fusion or something.

00:09:04.000 I mean, that would be way up there.

00:09:06.000 If you could actually program children to be more productive, happy citizens, because

00:09:13.140 they're using their phone all day anyway, wouldn't that be insanely valuable?

00:09:19.080 Like, just incredibly valuable?

00:09:20.820 Well, something to think about.

00:09:24.100 Yeah, we'll get to Trump.

00:09:25.940 Of course we'll get to Trump.

00:09:27.960 Of course.

00:09:29.740 But first, Thomas Massey had a tweet today about something to scare you, also AI related,

00:09:36.800 of course.

00:09:38.120 So the chief innovation officer at the National Archives is talking about using AI to literally

00:09:46.080 rewrite history, to make it more woke.

00:09:52.860 So, in other words, to get rid of what they call the inherent bias in the existing records.

00:09:58.380 Now, I do believe the records have an existing bias.

00:10:01.880 No argument there.

00:10:03.960 I'm sure history has a bias.

00:10:06.720 But are you at all worried about AI rewriting human history?

00:10:10.940 Does any of that scare you?

00:10:15.640 It scares Thomas Massey, and it scares the hell out of me.

00:10:21.140 So, we're going to come into some strange times, which is, we know our history is fake, right?

00:10:29.660 Kind of do.

00:10:31.400 You know, here's a question I have.

00:10:33.620 How many books will AI be able to consume?

00:10:38.320 Because AI is only going to have access to what it has legal access to and what is digitized.

00:10:46.200 So there might be a whole field of knowledge that AI doesn't immediately have access to

00:10:51.040 because it's not as digitized as it could be.

00:10:53.220 Or it's not, or it would have to buy it.

00:10:55.640 And maybe it'd be too expensive to buy all the books in Amazon or something.

00:11:00.140 So there might be some holes in its knowledge for a while, but not very long.

00:11:06.980 And then eventually.

00:11:08.360 So imagine telling AI to rewrite history.

00:11:11.420 Hey, AI, go rewrite history, but take into account all of the books written by scholars

00:11:18.120 in different countries, as well as all the scholars who have written things in America.

00:11:23.580 What would that look like?

00:11:25.840 How would AI decide what was real and what was credible?

00:11:30.720 If it just took a consensus of like what other countries thought was the history of the United States

00:11:36.540 plus what the United States thought its own history was,

00:11:40.200 that wouldn't look anything like American history.

00:11:43.820 If AI wrote it, it would look at all the other opinions of America

00:11:47.780 because those are valid.

00:11:50.280 Just because it's our country doesn't mean we have the right history

00:11:53.100 because other people could watch it at the same time, right?

00:11:56.400 If they wrote about it differently than we wrote about it, well, that would be a question, wouldn't it?

00:12:01.780 Who wrote about it accurately?

00:12:03.420 So if AI rewrites history, not just to make it less biased, but to make it more accurate,

00:12:09.500 because you know somebody's going to do that, what does that do?

00:12:12.620 We're supposed to be learning from history, but history will keep changing?

00:12:17.520 This could be very unsettling.

00:12:19.900 We won't know.

00:12:20.800 Yeah, we won't even know who won wars.

00:12:23.080 We won't know why wars started.

00:12:25.480 We won't know who won.

00:12:27.020 We won't know why anybody won.

00:12:28.600 Because it might just change.

00:12:33.200 All right.

00:12:34.200 Here's a horrible story, then we'll talk about Trump.

00:12:37.260 Tech executive Bob Lee, founder of Cash App,

00:12:43.000 and he was a, I guess he was a notable tech person in San Francisco,

00:12:47.500 43 years old, and he was stabbed to death in San Francisco

00:12:50.740 on the 300 block of Main Street.

00:12:54.140 Now, this caught my attention not only because it was a horrible tragedy,

00:12:57.300 and we feel bad for Bob Lee's family and friends.

00:13:02.960 But this is the same block that I was attacked with a knife.

00:13:07.660 So I was mugged by a street person with a very large knife.

00:13:13.420 It was sort of the Crocodile Dundee-sized knife.

00:13:18.240 And this was in the 80s.

00:13:20.500 So in the 80s, I was robbed twice at gunpoint

00:13:24.280 while I was a bank teller in downtown San Francisco.

00:13:28.040 Once by gun on the street,

00:13:30.460 once by a very large knife exactly where he was stabbed to death.

00:13:34.100 Same block.

00:13:35.080 I looked at the picture to make sure I was remembering it correctly.

00:13:38.540 Same place.

00:13:39.880 Same place.

00:13:41.280 And I had one gun pointed at my head,

00:13:44.960 and the trigger was pulled,

00:13:46.500 but there was no round in the cylinder.

00:13:50.140 What do you call it?

00:13:50.960 Cylinder.

00:13:54.940 And let's see.

00:13:55.800 My apartment was robbed once.

00:13:57.880 My car was broken into three times.

00:14:00.180 Lost three car stereos.

00:14:04.200 Yeah.

00:14:05.280 Yeah.

00:14:06.000 In the revolver.

00:14:07.040 In the chamber.

00:14:07.580 It had no round in the chamber.

00:14:13.560 It was kind of an exciting day

00:14:15.660 when somebody points a gun at your head and pulls the trigger.

00:14:19.080 You remember that for a long time.

00:14:21.860 So here's my only comment.

00:14:23.980 There was a time in, let's say, the early 2000s

00:14:28.920 where I was visiting San Francisco

00:14:30.900 and walking down the street,

00:14:33.020 and I remember saying to myself,

00:14:34.360 wow, this place used to be a lot rougher.

00:14:39.160 Now it's all gentrified and yuppies

00:14:41.180 and full of high-tech people.

00:14:42.900 And I was actually impressed

00:14:44.800 at how San Francisco had gone from the 80s

00:14:47.860 being a pretty dangerous place,

00:14:51.100 very dangerous place, honestly,

00:14:53.260 to what I thought was a model city,

00:14:56.480 like one of the best places you could ever walk around,

00:14:59.440 felt totally safe.

00:15:00.760 At least walking in the main places,

00:15:03.280 you felt totally safe.

00:15:05.360 But apparently we've lost all that.

00:15:07.880 Now the only thing I'm going to add to the story is

00:15:10.100 these things might be cyclical.

00:15:13.520 I tend to think the cities are dead.

00:15:16.940 I think they're dead.

00:15:18.420 I think the next time the cities will be alive

00:15:21.140 is when robots rebuild them.

00:15:23.260 That could be a while.

00:15:24.740 I don't think people are going to rebuild cities.

00:15:27.560 I just don't think they make any sense.

00:15:29.240 Because there doesn't seem to be enough willingness

00:15:32.620 to put the law enforcement resources there

00:15:36.100 that would be needed for them to be survivable.

00:15:38.980 So I would just get away from the cities.

00:15:42.440 Yeah.

00:15:42.920 If you have a choice,

00:15:44.100 if you have any options whatsoever,

00:15:46.480 just get out of the cities.

00:15:48.060 Because I don't think they're coming back

00:15:50.580 until the robots can rebuild them

00:15:52.340 in 50 years or whatever.

00:15:55.520 All right.

00:15:56.240 Let's talk about Trump's arraignment.

00:15:57.620 Well, it feels like things are back to normal.

00:16:03.520 And by normal, I mean all the news is about Trump.

00:16:06.160 And if it's not about Trump,

00:16:07.520 well, we don't care.

00:16:09.900 I mean, we do care.

00:16:11.140 But it feels like he once again

00:16:13.240 sucked all of the energy out of the news business.

00:16:17.060 Nobody does it like he does.

00:16:19.360 He can suck energy out of the news business

00:16:21.560 like nobody's ever sucked energy.

00:16:24.360 On YouTube, does it look like I'm too bright?

00:16:29.380 And by that, I mean lighting, not intelligence.

00:16:32.620 Am I over-lit on YouTube?

00:16:35.940 What do you think?

00:16:37.140 Because it looks about right.

00:16:40.080 Yeah, it looks about right.

00:16:41.780 Let me see if I can make a quick adjustment here.

00:16:48.440 This could go very wrong.

00:16:53.160 But maybe yes.

00:16:54.360 Eh, well, we'll go for that.

00:16:55.960 We're going to go with that for now.

00:16:58.380 All right.

00:16:58.760 So Trump got arraigned in New York.

00:17:02.980 The funny part of the story

00:17:04.980 is that by complete coincidence,

00:17:09.240 it's a little too dark,

00:17:10.800 but we're going to go with it for now.

00:17:12.420 But by complete coincidence,

00:17:14.300 the court ordered Stormy Daniels

00:17:16.240 to pay back $120,000 in legal fees

00:17:19.540 on top of the legal fees she already had to pay back.

00:17:22.060 Yeah, that's too dark, isn't it?

00:17:25.380 Too dark.

00:17:31.760 I'll get this right.

00:17:32.700 So what are the odds

00:17:36.220 that the Stormy Daniels story

00:17:37.920 would come out at the same time

00:17:39.420 as the Trump arraignment?

00:17:42.380 Can we calculate that story?

00:17:44.360 Because probably it could have happened

00:17:46.980 any time in the year.

00:17:48.800 So it was like a 1 in 365 chance

00:17:52.240 that any one of them would have happened.

00:17:54.980 All right, help me with the statistics.

00:17:56.580 There are two events

00:17:58.680 that are not correlated.

00:18:01.560 What are the odds that they happen

00:18:02.920 on the same day

00:18:03.860 and the same year?

00:18:07.360 It's 1 out of 365 times 1 out of 365, right?

00:18:16.360 1 365 times 1 365?

00:18:19.140 No, just once?

00:18:23.580 Oh, because the first one is a given.

00:18:26.460 All right, so the first one is a given.

00:18:28.540 So it's only the second one

00:18:29.920 you have to look at.

00:18:31.600 And then the second one

00:18:32.640 has a 1 in 365 chance

00:18:34.660 of being on that same day.

00:18:35.880 Got it.

00:18:36.320 Okay.

00:18:37.080 Yeah.

00:18:38.140 No, that's right.

00:18:39.780 Yeah, it's 1 in 365.

00:18:41.660 Because one of them is just a given.

00:18:44.720 At some point, it's a given, right?

00:18:46.660 And then the other one

00:18:47.840 just has to match it, 1 in 365.

00:18:49.940 So it was very unlikely,

00:18:51.640 but it happened.

00:18:53.360 I think I figured that out.

00:18:55.280 All right, with your help.

00:18:57.760 So even CNN at first

00:18:59.860 was underwhelmed

00:19:00.880 by the quality of the charges.

00:19:04.340 And if you've lost CNN,

00:19:06.040 you've lost...

00:19:07.160 you're in bad shape.

00:19:09.460 But thankfully, Jake Tapper

00:19:11.560 found a way to make it sound

00:19:13.160 like it was more important

00:19:14.300 than it was

00:19:14.920 by saying that there were

00:19:17.040 34 felony counts.

00:19:21.800 And if you leave out

00:19:22.760 some of the context,

00:19:23.740 such as...

00:19:25.100 Oh, no, here's the way he said it.

00:19:27.280 That he was talking

00:19:29.000 to legal people,

00:19:30.420 and they said that

00:19:31.320 the 34 misdemeanor counts

00:19:33.580 were fairly strong.

00:19:36.560 But there was lack of specificity

00:19:39.340 on the alleged federal crime

00:19:42.860 that the misdemeanors

00:19:44.280 were supposed to be covering up,

00:19:46.780 which would elevate them

00:19:48.220 to felonies.

00:19:49.740 It's all very complicated.

00:19:52.140 But here's something

00:19:53.260 that Jake did not mention

00:19:54.720 when he said

00:19:55.360 that the 34 misdemeanors

00:19:58.040 were fairly solid.

00:20:01.800 Here's something

00:20:03.640 that I would have mentioned.

00:20:04.740 the statute of limitation

00:20:07.300 had run out

00:20:08.400 for all of them.

00:20:09.800 Do you think

00:20:10.340 that would be important?

00:20:12.660 You know,

00:20:12.940 just as something to mention.

00:20:14.700 If you're mentioning

00:20:15.580 that the charges

00:20:16.900 are solid,

00:20:18.660 wouldn't you mention

00:20:19.540 that they're also

00:20:20.440 past the statute

00:20:21.680 of limitations?

00:20:22.920 That feels important.

00:20:24.180 Because I believe

00:20:25.640 the only way

00:20:26.240 that they can be

00:20:27.880 made legal,

00:20:29.560 you know,

00:20:29.860 within the statute

00:20:30.940 of limitations,

00:20:32.000 is if you can revive

00:20:33.460 this nebulous

00:20:34.500 other charge

00:20:35.400 that they're related to,

00:20:36.840 and then it's the other charge

00:20:38.460 in the statute

00:20:38.960 of limitations,

00:20:40.120 which would be

00:20:41.080 applied backwards

00:20:42.860 to the misdemeanor.

00:20:44.340 Does any of that

00:20:44.900 make sense?

00:20:46.140 Is there any lawyer

00:20:46.820 here to tell me

00:20:47.680 I'm full of shit?

00:20:48.540 Because I'm sure I am.

00:20:50.980 I have no idea

00:20:52.120 if I'm explaining

00:20:52.860 this correctly.

00:20:54.180 But I do know

00:20:56.880 that if you don't mention

00:20:58.000 that genuine lawyers

00:21:00.320 believe it's past

00:21:01.240 the statute of limitations,

00:21:02.720 you have not accurately

00:21:03.980 told the story.

00:21:05.540 Jake.

00:21:07.180 Jake, Jake, Jake.

00:21:10.500 Number two,

00:21:12.160 do you think that

00:21:12.920 at the same time

00:21:13.700 you said there are

00:21:14.320 34 solid misdemeanors,

00:21:18.180 do you think

00:21:18.600 it would have been

00:21:19.220 important maybe

00:21:20.100 to mention

00:21:20.640 at the same time

00:21:21.640 that it's really

00:21:22.700 just one charge?

00:21:24.180 Do you think

00:21:26.780 that clarifying

00:21:28.320 that the way

00:21:29.140 the law works

00:21:29.980 is every time

00:21:31.140 you make a journal entry

00:21:32.780 or write a check

00:21:34.280 or produce an invoice

00:21:36.140 or pay your taxes,

00:21:38.160 if it's all about

00:21:39.500 the same transaction,

00:21:41.320 it's just one thing

00:21:43.060 you did

00:21:43.620 that they're going

00:21:44.740 to count 34 times.

00:21:46.260 Now, I'm sure

00:21:49.280 that they mentioned it,

00:21:50.860 but if you don't mention it

00:21:53.220 at the same time

00:21:54.340 every time,

00:21:55.120 that's not news.

00:21:56.860 That's bullshit.

00:21:58.860 Right?

00:21:59.460 Here's how to tell

00:22:00.240 the news accurately.

00:22:01.860 There are 34 charges

00:22:03.440 that stem from

00:22:04.280 one alleged

00:22:05.520 inappropriate action.

00:22:07.660 Just one thing.

00:22:10.160 Mischaracterizing,

00:22:10.900 you know,

00:22:11.160 a payment.

00:22:11.500 The one thing,

00:22:13.900 according to experts,

00:22:15.420 is past the

00:22:16.240 statute of limitations.

00:22:18.240 The only way

00:22:19.140 to recover that thing

00:22:20.200 and to make it

00:22:21.620 still illegal

00:22:22.320 past the statute

00:22:23.520 of limitations

00:22:24.320 is if we,

00:22:26.540 as if the courts

00:22:28.200 or the jury,

00:22:29.100 I guess,

00:22:29.940 decided that the

00:22:30.820 other crime,

00:22:31.780 which is unspecified,

00:22:34.460 unspecified,

00:22:36.160 it's an arraignment

00:22:37.460 in which the entire

00:22:38.460 point is to show

00:22:39.900 the defendant

00:22:40.880 what they have

00:22:41.500 to defend against

00:22:42.680 and they didn't

00:22:43.760 tell him.

00:22:45.060 They told him

00:22:45.620 the 34 things

00:22:46.600 that are past

00:22:47.160 the statute of limitations

00:22:48.360 and they didn't

00:22:49.740 tell him specifically

00:22:51.360 the crime that

00:22:53.240 makes the other

00:22:54.060 ones important.

00:22:56.980 That is as close

00:22:58.300 to an absolute

00:22:59.580 nothing as anything

00:23:01.060 could be.

00:23:03.040 His risk at this point,

00:23:05.040 his legal risk

00:23:06.000 on a scale

00:23:07.000 of one to ten,

00:23:07.820 it's kind of zero,

00:23:10.040 isn't it?

00:23:12.040 Wouldn't you say

00:23:12.780 his legal risk

00:23:13.500 is zero?

00:23:14.460 Because the experts

00:23:15.460 are saying that

00:23:16.380 his next court

00:23:17.780 appearance is December,

00:23:19.520 which is crazy to me,

00:23:21.140 the fact that

00:23:21.780 you have to wait

00:23:22.240 until December.

00:23:23.420 Now, I know his lawyers

00:23:24.460 want as much time

00:23:25.380 as possible too,

00:23:26.300 but it's just crazy

00:23:27.500 how long things take.

00:23:29.340 But by then,

00:23:30.520 the experts,

00:23:31.480 the lawyers say,

00:23:32.800 some higher court

00:23:34.460 will have thrown it out.

00:23:36.440 So this entire thing

00:23:38.660 is over

00:23:39.980 literally trumped up

00:23:41.660 charges.

00:23:42.300 And by the way,

00:23:44.120 what were the odds

00:23:45.320 that somebody

00:23:46.660 named Trump

00:23:47.360 would be brought up

00:23:49.160 on trumped up

00:23:50.060 charges?

00:23:51.360 Like literally

00:23:52.060 trumped up charges.

00:23:54.920 It's just

00:23:55.620 such a weird world.

00:23:57.940 And then the guy

00:23:58.580 who did it

00:23:59.320 bragged about it.

00:24:00.620 And his name is Bragg.

00:24:02.500 He bragged

00:24:03.400 about all this

00:24:05.060 good work.

00:24:06.260 In fact,

00:24:06.660 when he gave his talk,

00:24:07.560 mostly he was bragging

00:24:08.480 about all the things

00:24:10.220 he's done

00:24:10.680 and the experience

00:24:11.360 he has

00:24:11.920 and the years

00:24:12.400 he's done

00:24:12.820 and how he's

00:24:13.720 always very thorough.

00:24:15.180 His entire talk

00:24:16.960 was bragging.

00:24:18.740 True.

00:24:19.680 And who is

00:24:20.960 the most famous

00:24:22.260 bragger in the world?

00:24:24.560 If you had to pick

00:24:25.360 one person,

00:24:26.020 the most famous

00:24:26.800 bragger in the world,

00:24:29.280 it's Trump.

00:24:30.840 Trump is the most

00:24:31.740 famous bragger

00:24:32.520 in the world.

00:24:33.120 and he got

00:24:34.440 taken down

00:24:34.980 by somebody

00:24:35.440 named Bragg.

00:24:37.340 I mean,

00:24:37.900 come on.

00:24:39.160 Come on.

00:24:41.300 It's a little bit

00:24:42.060 too on the nose.

00:24:44.180 That's how you know

00:24:44.760 we're a simulation.

00:24:45.680 We are breathing

00:24:46.320 this into existence.

00:24:48.780 All right.

00:24:49.220 So the most

00:24:50.060 entertaining outcome

00:24:51.580 seems to be happening.

00:24:53.900 This is pretty

00:24:54.840 entertaining.

00:24:57.100 And I'm pretty sure

00:24:58.300 he's not

00:24:58.720 in any legal trouble

00:25:00.000 in the end.

00:25:00.700 So what does

00:25:03.000 the news say

00:25:03.800 when they need

00:25:04.500 to get clicks

00:25:05.220 and they realize

00:25:06.240 that the first

00:25:07.180 of his

00:25:08.220 more than one

00:25:09.540 legal problems

00:25:10.480 turns out to be

00:25:11.860 a big nothing?

00:25:13.680 It's a big nothing.

00:25:15.300 So what do they say

00:25:16.160 when they find out

00:25:16.880 that the current

00:25:17.640 legal problems

00:25:18.360 are a big nothing?

00:25:20.240 We'll wait

00:25:20.780 to this next one.

00:25:22.880 Okay.

00:25:23.640 Okay.

00:25:24.380 I'm willing

00:25:25.060 to accept

00:25:25.800 that maybe

00:25:26.580 the walls

00:25:27.300 are not closing in

00:25:28.800 on this

00:25:29.980 Stormy Daniels

00:25:31.040 payment stuff.

00:25:32.060 Probably it's either

00:25:32.980 just misdemeanors

00:25:34.100 or misdemeanors

00:25:35.000 that are already

00:25:35.820 expired and nothing.

00:25:37.460 Probably a big nothing.

00:25:38.740 It's underwhelming.

00:25:40.020 But wow.

00:25:41.180 Wow.

00:25:42.160 Do they have him

00:25:43.020 on this box gate?

00:25:44.880 Oh, the box hoax.

00:25:46.100 Not the box hoax.

00:25:46.960 I mean the box gate.

00:25:49.080 Those Mar-a-Lago

00:25:50.060 boxes, man.

00:25:51.460 Whoa.

00:25:53.220 We got him now.

00:25:54.740 Don't we?

00:25:55.540 Don't we?

00:25:56.040 We got him now.

00:25:56.960 Now.

00:25:58.800 We still don't know

00:26:00.020 what was in the boxes.

00:26:02.140 How did we get

00:26:03.200 to this point

00:26:03.740 without knowing

00:26:04.360 what's in the boxes?

00:26:06.220 If those boxes

00:26:07.440 had anything in them

00:26:09.480 that was

00:26:09.780 national security related,

00:26:12.140 you don't think

00:26:13.060 we'd know about that?

00:26:15.600 Really?

00:26:17.060 Really?

00:26:18.000 You don't think

00:26:19.140 we would know already

00:26:20.480 if there were

00:26:21.660 sensitive national

00:26:23.120 security secrets

00:26:24.080 in those boxes?

00:26:25.840 Box gate

00:26:26.780 is going to be

00:26:28.320 ridiculous.

00:26:29.800 Now,

00:26:30.400 apparently,

00:26:31.300 they're going to

00:26:31.780 try to make

00:26:32.300 the real story

00:26:33.120 not about

00:26:33.980 what's in the boxes.

00:26:35.160 Do you know why?

00:26:36.740 Do you know why

00:26:37.280 the real story

00:26:37.980 is not going to be

00:26:38.640 about the contents

00:26:39.740 of the boxes?

00:26:41.440 Because there's

00:26:42.160 nothing important

00:26:43.060 in the boxes.

00:26:44.680 That's why.

00:26:45.940 Because there was

00:26:46.660 nothing in there

00:26:47.460 but mementos

00:26:48.660 and

00:26:49.000 unimportant stuff.

00:26:51.100 So now that

00:26:53.800 has to be about

00:26:54.620 the cover-up

00:26:55.700 or the resisting

00:26:56.980 rules.

00:26:59.700 Do you know

00:27:00.000 how easy

00:27:00.640 it's going to be

00:27:01.240 to defend

00:27:01.900 against the

00:27:03.140 idea that

00:27:04.140 there was

00:27:04.680 some resistance

00:27:06.260 or cover-up

00:27:07.100 or something

00:27:08.300 like that?

00:27:09.180 Let me explain

00:27:10.000 the entire defense.

00:27:12.300 Mr. Trump,

00:27:13.640 did you tell

00:27:14.400 anybody to

00:27:15.480 resist giving

00:27:16.560 boxes back?

00:27:18.060 No.

00:27:18.440 No.

00:27:18.520 And

00:27:21.980 the end.

00:27:24.340 Because unless

00:27:24.880 they have some

00:27:25.420 evidence where

00:27:26.080 somebody says,

00:27:27.100 yes,

00:27:27.940 the president,

00:27:28.940 the president,

00:27:30.120 the president,

00:27:31.600 you know,

00:27:31.920 Trump,

00:27:32.600 told me not

00:27:33.820 to give them

00:27:34.380 these secrets

00:27:35.040 back.

00:27:36.180 Do you think

00:27:36.740 that's going

00:27:37.200 to happen?

00:27:38.160 Do you think

00:27:38.760 there's a human

00:27:39.420 being who

00:27:40.800 in the real

00:27:41.340 world was

00:27:42.040 told by Trump

00:27:42.860 to keep

00:27:44.120 these boxes

00:27:44.740 secret and

00:27:45.360 don't give

00:27:45.740 them back

00:27:46.100 and that

00:27:46.740 that person,

00:27:47.500 whoever that

00:27:47.960 is,

00:27:48.520 is going

00:27:48.900 to testify

00:27:49.380 that that

00:27:49.920 happened?

00:27:50.800 Do you think

00:27:51.140 that's going

00:27:51.500 to happen?

00:27:52.540 Because I don't

00:27:53.300 see any other

00:27:53.980 way he gets

00:27:54.520 convicted.

00:27:55.380 Do you?

00:27:56.100 Do you think

00:27:56.780 there's an email

00:27:57.560 where Trump

00:27:58.400 said it?

00:27:58.920 No.

00:27:59.420 He doesn't do

00:27:59.960 email.

00:28:00.740 Do you think

00:28:01.180 he sent a text?

00:28:02.260 No.

00:28:03.240 Do you think

00:28:03.620 there's a recorded

00:28:04.380 phone call?

00:28:05.700 No.

00:28:08.660 At most,

00:28:10.280 at the very

00:28:10.960 most,

00:28:12.540 he whispered

00:28:13.260 in somebody's

00:28:13.860 ear or

00:28:14.500 didn't.

00:28:16.060 And my guess

00:28:16.680 is he didn't.

00:28:17.340 Now,

00:28:18.680 here's the

00:28:19.360 most likely

00:28:19.980 thing that

00:28:20.420 happened.

00:28:21.720 We thought

00:28:22.300 we returned

00:28:22.920 all the

00:28:23.320 boxes,

00:28:24.320 but we

00:28:25.800 were wrong.

00:28:26.960 There were

00:28:27.540 some more

00:28:27.920 boxes.

00:28:29.280 That's probably

00:28:30.040 going to be

00:28:30.320 the whole

00:28:30.600 story.

00:28:31.720 Or,

00:28:32.520 I told Bob

00:28:33.820 to give you

00:28:34.800 all the boxes,

00:28:36.020 but when we

00:28:36.920 talked to Bob,

00:28:37.740 he thought you

00:28:38.300 meant only the

00:28:38.940 boxes that were

00:28:39.800 marked a certain

00:28:40.560 way.

00:28:40.880 it's just

00:28:42.740 going to be

00:28:43.080 somebody

00:28:43.500 miscommunicated.

00:28:45.000 That's going

00:28:45.420 to be the

00:28:45.700 entire case.

00:28:47.260 It's like,

00:28:47.940 oh,

00:28:48.760 it wasn't

00:28:49.260 Trump,

00:28:50.280 it was Bob

00:28:51.120 told Joe,

00:28:52.560 and Joe

00:28:53.180 didn't understand

00:28:53.980 Bob,

00:28:54.580 so they didn't

00:28:55.080 get everything

00:28:55.580 back the way

00:28:56.440 it probably

00:28:56.920 should have,

00:28:57.960 and so there

00:28:58.480 was some

00:28:58.800 miscommunication.

00:29:00.180 It's going to

00:29:00.640 be that.

00:29:01.620 There's going

00:29:02.160 to be nothing

00:29:02.680 to this story.

00:29:03.560 It's just going

00:29:03.980 to disappear.

00:29:05.300 And that's what

00:29:06.040 they're hoping

00:29:06.420 for.

00:29:07.300 They're hoping

00:29:07.740 that's the big

00:29:08.240 one, but I

00:29:08.760 don't think it

00:29:09.140 is.

00:29:09.320 Another part

00:29:11.600 of the story

00:29:12.140 involved the

00:29:13.140 number of

00:29:14.040 charges,

00:29:14.820 that 34

00:29:15.420 charges,

00:29:16.440 and apparently

00:29:17.080 in the legal

00:29:17.940 profession,

00:29:19.140 if it were a

00:29:19.840 federal crime,

00:29:20.640 there would be

00:29:21.100 guidance against

00:29:21.940 doing that.

00:29:23.140 Do you know

00:29:23.440 why, if it

00:29:24.040 were a federal

00:29:24.520 crime, if it

00:29:25.760 were a federal

00:29:26.380 court, do you

00:29:27.600 know why there

00:29:28.280 would be

00:29:28.800 guidance to

00:29:29.460 not push it

00:29:31.920 up to 34

00:29:32.640 counts when

00:29:33.340 it's really

00:29:33.660 just one

00:29:34.100 action?

00:29:34.920 It's because

00:29:35.680 it makes

00:29:36.400 bias.

00:29:37.760 If you hear

00:29:38.320 there are 34

00:29:39.120 charges, you

00:29:39.880 think, well,

00:29:40.500 some of them

00:29:41.060 have got to

00:29:41.340 be real, but

00:29:43.060 it's really

00:29:43.440 one thing.

00:29:44.700 So you

00:29:45.400 should treat

00:29:45.860 it more

00:29:46.480 like it's

00:29:46.980 one thing,

00:29:48.560 or a few

00:29:49.280 things, so

00:29:50.480 that you're

00:29:50.780 not trying

00:29:51.240 to influence

00:29:52.080 some future

00:29:53.060 jury that,

00:29:55.280 man, he

00:29:55.660 did so many

00:29:56.300 things, you

00:29:56.820 got to find

00:29:57.260 him guilty

00:29:57.700 on at least

00:29:58.160 a few of

00:29:58.620 them.

00:29:59.280 It must

00:29:59.560 be something

00:30:00.020 he did

00:30:00.380 with all

00:30:00.700 that smoke.

00:30:01.960 So this

00:30:02.420 is an

00:30:02.840 all that

00:30:03.340 smoke, there

00:30:03.940 must be

00:30:04.380 fire,

00:30:04.940 persuasion,

00:30:05.760 and should

00:30:06.160 not be part

00:30:06.700 of the legal

00:30:07.120 system, but

00:30:08.240 apparently at

00:30:08.860 the state

00:30:09.180 level, there

00:30:10.500 is no

00:30:11.040 specific

00:30:11.660 guidance not

00:30:13.820 to do

00:30:14.120 that.

00:30:14.940 So he

00:30:15.280 did it.

00:30:16.280 So Bragg

00:30:17.120 did it.

00:30:17.440 He just

00:30:17.700 made it look

00:30:18.240 like it

00:30:18.520 was a lot

00:30:18.900 of charges,

00:30:19.880 and he

00:30:20.380 even threw

00:30:20.900 in some

00:30:21.760 stuff about

00:30:22.480 the National

00:30:24.000 Enquirer and

00:30:24.940 McDougal and

00:30:25.620 Packer, and

00:30:26.720 it turns out

00:30:27.200 those have

00:30:27.620 nothing to

00:30:28.100 do with the

00:30:28.460 charges.

00:30:29.760 He threw

00:30:30.380 in a whole

00:30:30.860 story of

00:30:31.620 bad behavior

00:30:32.520 that he's

00:30:34.100 not charging

00:30:34.700 for and

00:30:35.460 is not

00:30:35.820 directly

00:30:36.280 related to

00:30:36.920 the charges.

00:30:38.920 Who does

00:30:39.640 that?

00:30:41.080 That's the

00:30:41.620 most biased

00:30:42.160 thing I've

00:30:42.600 ever seen

00:30:42.960 in my

00:30:43.240 life,

00:30:44.120 throwing in

00:30:44.700 an unrelated

00:30:45.480 story that

00:30:46.340 you're going

00:30:46.600 to, it's

00:30:47.340 unrelated.

00:30:48.620 I mean, you

00:30:48.960 could say

00:30:49.320 they're both

00:30:49.780 involved with

00:30:50.500 them, but

00:30:50.960 it's pretty

00:30:51.240 unrelated.

00:30:55.980 So the

00:30:58.700 fact that

00:30:59.180 no specific

00:31:00.340 charge was

00:31:01.100 mentioned

00:31:01.500 that would

00:31:02.740 make the

00:31:03.240 misdemeanors

00:31:03.980 felonies,

00:31:06.040 that's so

00:31:06.700 sketchy.

00:31:07.840 I mean, that's

00:31:08.680 beyond the

00:31:09.500 sketchiest of

00:31:10.220 the sketchiest

00:31:10.860 thing I've

00:31:11.320 ever seen

00:31:11.760 in the legal

00:31:12.300 system.

00:31:14.000 Apparently,

00:31:14.760 Trump already

00:31:17.220 raised $8

00:31:17.980 million as

00:31:18.940 of yesterday,

00:31:19.520 I guess,

00:31:19.960 off of this

00:31:20.800 controversy.

00:31:24.060 But what

00:31:24.760 did you think

00:31:25.360 of Trump's

00:31:26.520 speech afterwards

00:31:27.460 if you saw

00:31:28.240 it?

00:31:28.540 So Trump

00:31:29.200 goes back

00:31:29.640 to Mar-a-Lago

00:31:30.240 and gives

00:31:31.580 a teleprompter

00:31:33.940 speech, mostly.

00:31:36.260 All right,

00:31:36.500 let me see

00:31:37.060 your comments

00:31:37.600 before I

00:31:38.100 tell you

00:31:38.620 mine.

00:31:39.580 I'm reading

00:31:40.040 them off,

00:31:40.820 some of

00:31:41.200 them.

00:31:42.140 Too long,

00:31:43.400 boring,

00:31:44.380 good,

00:31:44.840 good,

00:31:45.440 boring,

00:31:46.440 tired,

00:31:48.240 sounded

00:31:50.860 tired,

00:31:51.620 boring.

00:31:52.480 All right,

00:31:53.120 here's my

00:31:54.000 take.

00:31:54.400 I thought

00:31:57.100 it was a

00:31:57.500 poor

00:31:57.680 performance.

00:31:59.220 Poor.

00:31:59.860 I don't

00:32:00.240 say that

00:32:00.680 often.

00:32:01.660 Maybe never.

00:32:02.480 I don't know

00:32:02.840 if I've ever

00:32:03.280 said that

00:32:03.680 about Trump.

00:32:04.620 I thought

00:32:05.020 it was a

00:32:05.320 poor

00:32:05.460 performance

00:32:06.060 by his

00:32:07.140 standards.

00:32:08.660 Maybe it

00:32:09.220 wasn't a

00:32:09.580 poor

00:32:09.740 performance

00:32:10.240 by an

00:32:11.180 ordinary

00:32:11.640 politician.

00:32:12.920 But for

00:32:13.280 him,

00:32:13.540 it was

00:32:13.840 low energy.

00:32:15.220 It was

00:32:16.340 backwards

00:32:16.900 looking.

00:32:17.600 It was

00:32:17.840 filled with

00:32:18.340 grievance.

00:32:19.600 And it

00:32:20.020 did not

00:32:20.360 have a

00:32:20.920 forward

00:32:21.720 looking

00:32:22.160 sort of

00:32:22.960 positive

00:32:23.400 message

00:32:23.840 at all.

00:32:26.360 And I'm

00:32:27.300 stealing that

00:32:27.840 comment from

00:32:28.400 Van Jones

00:32:29.100 because he

00:32:29.520 said the

00:32:29.860 same thing

00:32:30.300 on CNN

00:32:30.780 but he

00:32:31.180 said it

00:32:31.480 better.

00:32:32.880 Yeah.

00:32:33.460 So credit

00:32:34.820 to Van

00:32:35.280 Jones as

00:32:35.860 always.

00:32:37.260 In my

00:32:38.000 opinion,

00:32:38.480 the best

00:32:38.880 CNN

00:32:39.340 commentator

00:32:40.080 because

00:32:41.240 that's

00:32:42.260 what I

00:32:42.620 saw too.

00:32:43.860 I saw

00:32:44.460 a backwards

00:32:45.240 grievance

00:32:45.860 filled

00:32:46.340 unimpressive

00:32:48.840 laundry list

00:32:50.680 of stuff.

00:32:52.080 I just

00:32:52.760 didn't see

00:32:53.220 the Trump

00:32:53.860 I expected

00:32:54.480 to see.

00:32:55.400 Now people

00:32:56.000 said he

00:32:56.680 looked tired

00:32:57.280 which he

00:32:59.100 did.

00:32:59.620 He looked

00:32:59.920 tired.

00:33:01.040 Other people

00:33:01.660 have speculated

00:33:02.300 that because

00:33:02.780 the judge

00:33:03.260 told him

00:33:03.840 not to

00:33:04.660 cause any

00:33:06.540 violence

00:33:07.060 through his

00:33:07.820 rhetoric

00:33:08.160 that he

00:33:09.180 may have

00:33:09.640 intentionally

00:33:10.140 toned it

00:33:10.640 down

00:33:10.940 but it

00:33:12.420 didn't look

00:33:12.980 like that.

00:33:14.340 It didn't

00:33:14.720 look like

00:33:15.340 the only

00:33:15.800 problem was

00:33:16.280 he was

00:33:16.500 toning it

00:33:16.920 down.

00:33:17.600 I'll tell

00:33:18.040 you what

00:33:18.260 it looked

00:33:18.520 like to

00:33:18.860 me and

00:33:19.980 I'm just

00:33:20.580 speculating.

00:33:21.280 I'm only

00:33:23.200 speculating

00:33:23.940 and it

00:33:24.960 only has

00:33:25.640 to do

00:33:26.100 with

00:33:27.520 how I

00:33:28.560 would feel

00:33:28.980 in the

00:33:29.240 same

00:33:29.440 situation.

00:33:31.540 I don't

00:33:32.400 think his

00:33:32.820 wife is 1.00

00:33:33.300 happy with

00:33:33.800 him.

00:33:35.260 Do we

00:33:35.980 agree?

00:33:37.200 Imagine

00:33:37.760 poor

00:33:38.180 Melania

00:33:38.680 who can't

00:33:40.200 leave the

00:33:40.640 house for

00:33:42.360 as long

00:33:42.820 as this

00:33:43.200 is going

00:33:43.560 on.

00:33:44.460 She can't

00:33:45.160 leave the

00:33:45.440 house.

00:33:46.380 Because if

00:33:46.860 she leaves

00:33:47.220 the house

00:33:47.560 everybody's

00:33:48.060 going to

00:33:48.220 say,

00:33:48.440 hey here's

00:33:49.540 a picture

00:33:49.960 what do

00:33:50.680 you think

00:33:50.920 of Stormy

00:33:51.440 Daniels?

00:33:52.340 What do

00:33:52.700 you think

00:33:52.940 of Stormy

00:33:53.440 Daniels?

00:33:54.040 How about

00:33:54.300 McGougal?

00:33:55.420 McDougal?

00:33:56.160 Stormy

00:33:56.520 Daniels?

00:33:58.000 Melania

00:33:58.600 is probably

00:34:00.580 ripping 0.97

00:34:01.100 Trump's

00:34:02.000 balls off

00:34:02.780 every day.

00:34:04.400 He looked

00:34:04.920 like,

00:34:05.380 here's my

00:34:05.880 bottom line,

00:34:07.120 Trump gave

00:34:07.720 a speech

00:34:08.300 like a man

00:34:09.760 who's having

00:34:10.260 marital

00:34:10.620 problems.

00:34:13.180 That's what

00:34:13.880 it looked

00:34:14.140 like.

00:34:14.820 It looked

00:34:15.180 like somebody

00:34:15.660 who's got

00:34:15.900 a problem

00:34:16.220 with his

00:34:16.560 wife and

00:34:17.800 it bothers

00:34:18.320 him a

00:34:18.660 lot.

00:34:19.620 Which is

00:34:20.260 okay.

00:34:21.840 Which is

00:34:22.320 okay.

00:34:23.040 Because that

00:34:23.740 would be the

00:34:24.120 most human

00:34:24.660 thing that

00:34:25.140 you could

00:34:25.420 imagine.

00:34:26.420 And I

00:34:26.740 do like

00:34:27.180 knowing he's

00:34:27.740 human.

00:34:29.060 I like

00:34:29.760 knowing Trump

00:34:30.300 is human.

00:34:31.260 We'll see

00:34:31.880 if under

00:34:32.980 a different

00:34:33.380 context he

00:34:34.160 can come

00:34:35.080 back to

00:34:35.480 life.

00:34:36.380 But that

00:34:37.400 day, that

00:34:39.040 very day when

00:34:39.880 he's being

00:34:40.340 arraigned for

00:34:41.020 that charge and

00:34:41.820 it's all the

00:34:42.460 news and it's

00:34:43.060 the only news,

00:34:44.400 Melania had

00:34:46.780 to be.

00:34:47.800 super upset.

00:34:50.080 Agree?

00:34:51.100 Is there

00:34:51.620 any way

00:34:51.980 Melania had

00:34:52.680 a good

00:34:52.940 day?

00:34:54.060 No.

00:34:55.500 And I

00:34:56.600 think that

00:34:57.060 Trump is

00:34:57.560 not immune

00:34:58.220 from happy

00:34:59.480 wife, happy

00:35:00.480 life.

00:35:01.320 He looked

00:35:02.400 like somebody

00:35:02.960 whose personal

00:35:03.740 life had been

00:35:04.440 torn apart.

00:35:06.100 And he was

00:35:06.760 just trying to

00:35:07.260 get through the

00:35:07.760 rest of the

00:35:08.140 day.

00:35:08.600 That's what

00:35:08.960 it looked

00:35:09.160 like to me.

00:35:10.240 So I

00:35:10.740 don't think

00:35:11.080 it was

00:35:11.300 necessarily

00:35:12.320 just fatigue,

00:35:13.640 although I

00:35:14.100 bet there

00:35:14.380 was some.

00:35:15.480 I don't

00:35:16.080 think it

00:35:16.340 was necessarily

00:35:17.100 that he

00:35:17.480 had such

00:35:17.800 a bad

00:35:18.120 day in

00:35:18.640 the legal

00:35:19.080 system,

00:35:19.980 because in

00:35:20.320 a way it

00:35:20.680 was kind

00:35:20.980 of good

00:35:21.340 for him.

00:35:22.720 It looked

00:35:23.360 like he

00:35:23.920 had some

00:35:24.180 personal

00:35:24.500 issues,

00:35:25.340 and he

00:35:25.760 should have.

00:35:27.100 I mean,

00:35:27.420 if anybody

00:35:27.960 deserved a

00:35:29.560 personal issue,

00:35:31.500 I mean,

00:35:32.580 he brought it

00:35:33.220 out himself,

00:35:33.820 of course.

00:35:35.040 But,

00:35:36.260 I don't know,

00:35:37.260 to me that

00:35:37.760 seems like the

00:35:38.500 biggest possible,

00:35:40.400 yes,

00:35:41.040 it's mind

00:35:41.820 reading and

00:35:42.340 speculation.

00:35:42.740 So I

00:35:44.880 like to

00:35:45.180 use speculation

00:35:46.000 instead of

00:35:46.800 mind reading,

00:35:47.780 because when

00:35:48.460 I'm speculating,

00:35:49.660 I'm telling

00:35:50.180 you I

00:35:50.540 don't know.

00:35:52.080 But if

00:35:52.660 you say

00:35:53.100 somebody is

00:35:54.060 thinking,

00:35:54.660 that's mind

00:35:55.120 reading,

00:35:55.460 because you

00:35:55.700 don't know.

00:35:56.560 But if

00:35:56.880 you say

00:35:57.300 that's what

00:35:58.120 I would

00:35:58.360 think in

00:35:58.700 that situation,

00:35:59.400 I think

00:35:59.660 that's

00:35:59.880 fair.

00:36:02.540 All

00:36:02.700 right.

00:36:06.360 Wall

00:36:06.800 Street

00:36:07.040 Journal was

00:36:07.800 pretty hard

00:36:08.340 on the

00:36:08.980 prosecution,

00:36:09.780 as you

00:36:12.380 can imagine.

00:36:13.640 Now,

00:36:14.460 in my

00:36:14.860 opinion,

00:36:15.340 I want to

00:36:15.660 see how

00:36:15.920 many people

00:36:16.400 believe or

00:36:17.520 agree with

00:36:17.940 this.

00:36:18.800 In my

00:36:19.260 opinion,

00:36:20.560 the whole

00:36:20.980 idea of

00:36:21.740 prosecuting a

00:36:22.820 past or

00:36:23.880 potential

00:36:24.680 president

00:36:25.160 started with

00:36:26.600 Trump.

00:36:27.960 And it

00:36:28.300 started when

00:36:29.600 he did the

00:36:30.320 locker up

00:36:31.180 stuff with

00:36:31.680 Hillary.

00:36:32.940 To me,

00:36:34.420 Trump started

00:36:35.120 this president

00:36:35.860 by looking

00:36:37.720 serious about

00:36:38.520 locking up

00:36:39.100 a competitor

00:36:40.000 for president.

00:36:41.320 And I

00:36:41.880 think it's

00:36:42.200 just coming

00:36:42.600 back to

00:36:43.000 him.

00:36:43.860 I always

00:36:44.520 thought it

00:36:44.800 was a

00:36:45.040 huge mistake.

00:36:46.920 I never

00:36:48.000 liked the

00:36:48.460 lock him

00:36:48.820 up stuff.

00:36:49.300 It was

00:36:49.480 kind of

00:36:49.740 funny,

00:36:50.980 but I

00:36:51.680 thought it

00:36:51.980 went way

00:36:52.400 too far,

00:36:53.420 and I

00:36:53.640 thought he

00:36:53.980 should have,

00:36:55.820 you know,

00:36:56.200 it's not his

00:36:56.780 personality to

00:36:57.520 stop that

00:36:58.000 sort of

00:36:58.280 thing,

00:36:58.560 but in a

00:36:59.520 perfect world,

00:37:00.720 that wouldn't

00:37:01.680 have happened.

00:37:02.620 Because I

00:37:03.200 don't think

00:37:03.580 that was

00:37:03.900 healthy for

00:37:04.380 the country.

00:37:05.640 I think

00:37:06.060 every time I

00:37:06.900 heard chanting

00:37:08.000 of lock

00:37:08.580 them up,

00:37:09.100 I said to

00:37:10.120 myself,

00:37:10.660 you realize

00:37:11.120 that's

00:37:11.620 increasing

00:37:12.060 your chances

00:37:12.720 of getting

00:37:13.140 locked up,

00:37:13.800 right?

00:37:14.920 And it

00:37:15.300 did.

00:37:16.720 Yeah.

00:37:17.240 I mean,

00:37:17.600 I think

00:37:17.960 the number

00:37:19.000 of Republicans

00:37:20.120 who are being

00:37:20.800 hunted right

00:37:22.500 now,

00:37:22.820 from the

00:37:23.280 J6ers to 1.00

00:37:24.300 Trump to

00:37:25.180 anybody else,

00:37:26.680 has a little

00:37:27.600 bit to do

00:37:28.260 with the fact

00:37:28.960 that top

00:37:29.520 Democrats

00:37:30.040 were threatened

00:37:32.420 with jail

00:37:33.060 in a

00:37:34.560 historical context

00:37:35.680 in which jail

00:37:36.460 didn't happen

00:37:37.000 very often.

00:37:39.260 Now,

00:37:39.760 obviously,

00:37:40.460 whatever

00:37:40.680 Hillary did 1.00

00:37:41.360 or did

00:37:41.700 not do

00:37:42.220 would have

00:37:42.580 been

00:37:42.780 different

00:37:43.420 allegations,

00:37:44.820 of course.

00:37:47.200 Yeah,

00:37:47.740 I think

00:37:48.500 Trump started

00:37:49.260 the whole

00:37:49.960 put a

00:37:51.580 politician in

00:37:52.400 jail thing

00:37:52.940 at the

00:37:53.220 highest level

00:37:53.800 and it

00:37:54.560 just came

00:37:54.940 back to

00:37:55.280 bite him 0.99

00:37:55.520 in the

00:37:55.740 ass. 0.70

00:37:56.560 And if

00:37:57.140 I had

00:37:57.500 been

00:37:57.680 Hillary 0.96

00:37:58.080 Clinton,

00:37:59.020 if I had

00:37:59.920 been Hillary 0.92

00:38:00.320 Clinton and

00:38:01.320 I knew

00:38:01.640 that,

00:38:02.400 because

00:38:02.660 remember,

00:38:03.160 isn't there

00:38:04.480 an audio

00:38:04.960 or email

00:38:06.220 from Hillary

00:38:06.880 in which

00:38:07.980 she indicated

00:38:08.580 she was

00:38:09.080 literally

00:38:09.760 afraid that

00:38:10.660 they would

00:38:10.920 all be

00:38:11.240 locked up?

00:38:12.760 That's

00:38:13.240 true,

00:38:13.540 right?

00:38:14.580 Don't we

00:38:15.040 have evidence

00:38:15.620 that Hillary 1.00

00:38:16.280 was actually

00:38:17.060 literally

00:38:17.560 afraid that

00:38:18.300 they would

00:38:18.540 all go

00:38:18.820 to jail?

00:38:20.480 Now,

00:38:21.060 if that

00:38:21.380 was the

00:38:21.680 case,

00:38:22.940 and if

00:38:23.960 I were

00:38:24.320 Hillary,

00:38:25.600 and I

00:38:25.940 was actually

00:38:26.780 believed I

00:38:27.720 might go

00:38:28.080 to jail

00:38:28.520 because of

00:38:30.480 my

00:38:30.660 competitor,

00:38:31.840 I would

00:38:32.320 make sure

00:38:33.260 that I

00:38:33.580 did everything

00:38:34.120 I could

00:38:34.500 do to

00:38:34.780 put him

00:38:35.040 in jail.

00:38:36.740 That would

00:38:37.340 be my

00:38:37.700 response.

00:38:38.720 And it

00:38:39.020 looks like

00:38:39.360 the Democrats

00:38:39.860 have this

00:38:40.520 full

00:38:42.960 intention

00:38:45.280 of putting

00:38:45.760 Trump in

00:38:46.220 jail any

00:38:46.840 way they

00:38:47.140 can.

00:38:48.040 So,

00:38:48.540 to me,

00:38:48.880 this is

00:38:49.140 just Hillary's 0.70

00:38:49.820 revenge.

00:38:51.200 It's just

00:38:51.840 working out

00:38:52.380 through the

00:38:52.960 Democratic

00:38:53.520 machine.

00:38:55.760 Yeah,

00:38:55.960 it's just

00:38:56.240 Hillary's 0.68

00:38:56.660 revenge.

00:38:58.520 So,

00:38:59.480 this would

00:39:00.240 suggest that

00:39:00.920 if Trump

00:39:01.400 becomes

00:39:01.760 president,

00:39:03.240 you'd

00:39:03.740 probably

00:39:04.020 try to

00:39:04.620 put Hillary

00:39:05.060 in jail

00:39:05.440 again.

00:39:07.800 Probably.

00:39:09.040 If there's

00:39:09.600 any reason

00:39:10.700 to do it.

00:39:12.220 But I

00:39:13.000 would be

00:39:13.300 just as

00:39:13.860 opposed.

00:39:15.320 All right,

00:39:15.640 Vivek Ramaswamy

00:39:16.680 played this

00:39:17.820 situation

00:39:18.400 the best.

00:39:20.500 He

00:39:20.940 immediately

00:39:22.220 and clearly

00:39:23.160 and loudly

00:39:23.920 said that

00:39:24.940 he would

00:39:25.300 pardon Trump

00:39:26.080 if he were

00:39:26.580 president.

00:39:28.520 That's

00:39:29.440 pretty clear.

00:39:30.560 But he

00:39:31.180 went further

00:39:31.820 and here's

00:39:32.840 the brilliant

00:39:33.240 part.

00:39:34.240 He said

00:39:34.660 he would

00:39:34.980 pardon

00:39:35.320 everybody

00:39:35.980 who's

00:39:36.340 politically

00:39:37.040 prosecuted.

00:39:39.480 So,

00:39:40.080 that would

00:39:40.260 include the

00:39:41.140 gentleman

00:39:41.880 who just

00:39:42.300 got prison

00:39:43.960 time for

00:39:44.580 a meme

00:39:45.060 about the

00:39:45.860 election.

00:39:46.920 I assume

00:39:47.760 it would

00:39:48.060 conclude

00:39:48.460 some

00:39:48.700 January 6

00:39:49.380 people.

00:39:50.460 And when

00:39:50.900 I heard

00:39:51.240 that,

00:39:51.580 I said

00:39:51.880 to myself,

00:39:52.720 that is

00:39:53.520 exactly

00:39:54.000 what I

00:39:54.400 wanted to

00:39:54.740 hear.

00:39:54.900 that is

00:39:56.280 exactly

00:39:56.860 what I

00:39:57.240 wanted to

00:39:57.540 hear.

00:39:58.420 That

00:39:58.600 somebody

00:39:59.060 would

00:39:59.340 try to

00:39:59.720 get,

00:40:01.160 in my

00:40:01.860 case,

00:40:02.460 what I

00:40:02.740 would call

00:40:03.840 overcharged

00:40:04.980 conservatives

00:40:08.180 out of

00:40:08.720 jail.

00:40:09.980 Because,

00:40:10.780 remember,

00:40:11.360 it's

00:40:11.600 especially

00:40:12.240 egregious

00:40:13.080 in the

00:40:13.860 context of

00:40:14.780 the

00:40:15.860 progressives

00:40:16.800 wanting to

00:40:17.420 have less

00:40:18.300 jail time

00:40:18.820 for everybody.

00:40:20.540 Really?

00:40:21.280 Less

00:40:21.660 jail time

00:40:22.380 for everybody

00:40:22.980 except the

00:40:24.320 president,

00:40:24.900 and political

00:40:27.640 people.

00:40:30.220 All right.

00:40:32.820 Rasmussen

00:40:33.420 did a poll

00:40:34.060 if Biden

00:40:35.060 versus Trump

00:40:35.920 ran.

00:40:36.780 Before I

00:40:37.220 tell you

00:40:37.560 the answer,

00:40:38.780 who do

00:40:39.060 you think

00:40:39.480 wins in

00:40:40.100 a matchup

00:40:40.600 between

00:40:40.920 Biden and

00:40:41.520 Trump if

00:40:42.120 it were

00:40:42.380 today?

00:40:44.540 Who do

00:40:45.160 you think

00:40:45.400 would win

00:40:45.860 Biden

00:40:46.280 versus

00:40:46.660 Trump

00:40:47.060 election

00:40:47.580 today?

00:40:48.880 No new

00:40:49.700 information,

00:40:50.620 election

00:40:51.180 today.

00:40:52.800 You're

00:40:53.040 saying

00:40:53.240 Trump.

00:40:53.620 see a lot

00:40:55.020 of

00:40:55.120 Trumps.

00:40:55.680 I think

00:40:56.040 that's

00:40:56.280 mostly

00:40:56.620 wishful

00:40:57.100 thinking.

00:40:58.360 However,

00:40:59.880 Rasmussen

00:41:00.320 poll

00:41:00.720 agrees with

00:41:01.360 you.

00:41:02.180 So there's

00:41:02.480 a new

00:41:02.660 Rasmussen

00:41:03.080 poll that

00:41:03.580 says if

00:41:03.940 the 2024

00:41:04.520 election

00:41:05.460 were between

00:41:06.780 Biden and

00:41:07.420 former

00:41:07.640 President

00:41:08.000 Trump,

00:41:08.620 47% of

00:41:10.080 likely U.S.

00:41:10.760 voters would

00:41:11.220 vote for

00:41:11.560 Trump,

00:41:12.080 while 40%

00:41:13.340 would vote

00:41:13.880 for Biden.

00:41:14.380 and that's

00:41:15.920 a pretty

00:41:16.440 big difference.

00:41:17.100 In

00:41:17.220 February,

00:41:18.400 Rasmussen

00:41:18.860 ran the

00:41:19.520 same poll,

00:41:21.000 and then

00:41:22.220 it was

00:41:22.620 45%

00:41:23.520 Biden,

00:41:24.220 42%

00:41:25.080 Trump.

00:41:26.660 That means

00:41:27.600 that Biden

00:41:28.460 lost five

00:41:29.020 points and

00:41:29.440 Trump gained

00:41:30.180 five points.

00:41:32.200 That's a

00:41:33.080 big margin.

00:41:35.300 Now,

00:41:35.880 I would not

00:41:36.660 expect this

00:41:37.280 to last,

00:41:38.680 because it's

00:41:39.360 way too

00:41:39.800 early.

00:41:40.120 the early

00:41:42.180 polls are

00:41:42.880 not that

00:41:43.660 predictive,

00:41:45.440 but it

00:41:46.460 does give

00:41:46.940 you a 0.57

00:41:47.400 sign of

00:41:47.880 the mood

00:41:48.460 of the

00:41:48.820 times.

00:41:50.960 So here's

00:41:52.580 the biggest

00:41:53.600 question that

00:41:54.280 people have

00:41:54.640 been asking

00:41:55.160 me lately.

00:41:56.680 Scott,

00:41:57.880 do you

00:41:58.460 really think

00:41:59.540 that Trump,

00:42:01.220 I mean

00:42:01.680 seriously,

00:42:02.300 Scott,

00:42:03.540 seriously,

00:42:04.700 you really

00:42:05.700 think that

00:42:06.260 Trump could

00:42:07.680 win in the

00:42:08.600 general election?

00:42:10.120 Really.

00:42:11.140 I get that

00:42:11.880 he could win

00:42:12.320 in the

00:42:12.520 primary,

00:42:13.160 because,

00:42:13.420 you know,

00:42:14.000 primaries are

00:42:14.720 unique,

00:42:15.800 but seriously,

00:42:17.060 Scott,

00:42:18.080 seriously,

00:42:18.940 you really

00:42:19.760 think that

00:42:20.240 Trump could

00:42:22.120 win a

00:42:22.600 general election

00:42:23.540 in 2024?

00:42:25.200 To which I

00:42:26.120 said,

00:42:26.780 it only matters

00:42:28.180 who he's

00:42:28.520 running against.

00:42:30.660 He's not

00:42:31.460 running by

00:42:33.100 himself.

00:42:34.560 He's not

00:42:35.320 running Trump

00:42:36.220 yes or no.

00:42:37.860 It's an

00:42:38.320 election against

00:42:39.000 another person.

00:42:40.120 If that

00:42:41.000 other person

00:42:41.600 is Biden,

00:42:43.160 yeah,

00:42:43.520 he could

00:42:43.800 win.

00:42:45.180 And then

00:42:45.520 people said,

00:42:46.240 but Biden

00:42:46.720 won last

00:42:47.320 time.

00:42:48.000 Yes,

00:42:48.480 last time

00:42:49.360 Biden had

00:42:50.140 not already

00:42:50.800 destroyed the

00:42:51.480 country.

00:42:53.200 Don't you

00:42:53.860 think that's

00:42:54.260 the difference?

00:42:55.900 Don't you

00:42:56.320 think that a

00:42:56.900 few years of

00:42:58.120 watching Biden

00:42:58.740 destroy the

00:42:59.380 country,

00:42:59.960 you don't

00:43:00.300 think that's

00:43:00.820 going to

00:43:01.060 change anyone's

00:43:02.380 mind?

00:43:03.220 We now have

00:43:04.120 a perfect

00:43:04.560 snapshot of

00:43:06.100 what a

00:43:06.540 Trump

00:43:06.860 administration

00:43:07.340 looks like

00:43:08.220 sort of

00:43:09.380 generically,

00:43:10.440 and a

00:43:11.000 perfect snapshot

00:43:11.780 of what a

00:43:12.260 Biden

00:43:12.460 administration

00:43:12.880 looks like

00:43:13.660 somewhat

00:43:14.540 generically.

00:43:16.340 It's a

00:43:17.080 completely

00:43:17.380 different race.

00:43:19.040 Before it

00:43:19.580 was unknowns,

00:43:21.760 right?

00:43:22.020 Before Trump

00:43:22.640 was in office,

00:43:23.420 you didn't

00:43:23.720 know.

00:43:24.820 It could have

00:43:25.340 been anything

00:43:25.820 that happened.

00:43:27.180 But now you

00:43:28.320 kind of know.

00:43:29.720 You kind of

00:43:30.320 know.

00:43:31.560 Now, here's the

00:43:32.540 question.

00:43:32.940 Would the

00:43:33.320 election be

00:43:33.900 so rigged

00:43:34.660 that Trump

00:43:36.660 couldn't win

00:43:37.260 if he had

00:43:37.680 that margin?

00:43:38.840 In my

00:43:39.480 opinion,

00:43:40.540 if the

00:43:40.900 polling,

00:43:41.300 let's say

00:43:41.680 the polling

00:43:42.560 maintained

00:43:43.100 this gap,

00:43:45.360 if the

00:43:45.740 polling,

00:43:46.660 if other

00:43:47.540 pollsters

00:43:48.100 agreed that

00:43:49.580 there was

00:43:49.880 this big

00:43:50.280 gap, you

00:43:51.280 can't cheat

00:43:51.760 that much.

00:43:53.080 That's too

00:43:53.540 much.

00:43:54.240 If it came

00:43:54.920 down to,

00:43:55.700 you know,

00:43:56.120 two counties,

00:43:57.900 yeah, you

00:43:59.500 could cheat.

00:44:00.580 You could

00:44:01.020 cheat in

00:44:01.620 two counties.

00:44:02.540 If that

00:44:03.100 was, you

00:44:03.620 know, the

00:44:03.920 difference.

00:44:04.520 But if it's

00:44:04.960 a 47 to

00:44:06.260 40 kind

00:44:07.220 of situation,

00:44:08.240 I just

00:44:09.680 don't think

00:44:10.080 you could

00:44:10.360 cheat that

00:44:10.960 much and

00:44:11.760 expect to

00:44:12.260 get away

00:44:12.580 with it.

00:44:13.980 Maybe.

00:44:15.180 But I don't

00:44:15.580 think so.

00:44:16.320 That would

00:44:16.560 be too

00:44:16.860 much.

00:44:18.020 So what

00:44:18.640 I expect

00:44:19.120 is that the

00:44:19.940 margins will

00:44:20.620 close before

00:44:21.440 election day,

00:44:22.420 it'll be

00:44:22.980 within 2%,

00:44:24.100 and then

00:44:24.620 anything's

00:44:25.140 possible.

00:44:26.660 In terms

00:44:27.360 of cheating,

00:44:27.940 anything would

00:44:28.400 be possible

00:44:28.980 once it

00:44:29.960 gets to be

00:44:30.420 a tight

00:44:30.880 election on

00:44:31.460 election day.

00:44:32.540 CNN fact

00:44:39.040 checked

00:44:39.420 Trump's

00:44:40.440 speech.

00:44:41.600 He had all

00:44:42.400 the usual

00:44:42.940 fact check

00:44:43.540 problems,

00:44:44.320 but they're

00:44:45.320 fact checking

00:44:45.840 the Soros

00:44:47.220 funding

00:44:48.660 connection.

00:44:49.300 now there's

00:44:55.100 no evidence

00:44:55.900 that they

00:44:56.360 cheated.

00:44:57.720 Let me

00:44:58.560 clarify.

00:45:00.120 What did

00:45:00.900 not happen

00:45:01.500 last time

00:45:02.180 is that

00:45:03.100 Trump went

00:45:03.560 into it

00:45:03.960 with a

00:45:04.240 huge margin

00:45:04.900 and then

00:45:05.900 the actual

00:45:06.460 election was

00:45:07.440 super close.

00:45:08.240 That didn't

00:45:08.660 happen last

00:45:09.180 time.

00:45:10.200 Do you get

00:45:11.700 that?

00:45:12.820 That didn't

00:45:13.580 happen last

00:45:14.160 time.

00:45:15.920 Right?

00:45:16.740 But this

00:45:17.420 time, it's

00:45:18.320 possible.

00:45:19.060 It's possible

00:45:19.600 that there

00:45:19.900 would be a

00:45:20.160 big gap

00:45:20.520 going into

00:45:20.920 the election.

00:45:22.100 You'd have

00:45:22.760 to have a

00:45:23.180 really big

00:45:23.680 gap to

00:45:25.080 make cheating

00:45:27.320 impossible.

00:45:28.900 You'd agree

00:45:29.560 with that,

00:45:29.980 right?

00:45:30.680 If the

00:45:31.300 polling is

00:45:31.820 just ridiculous,

00:45:33.480 cheating becomes

00:45:34.160 impractical at

00:45:34.940 that point.

00:45:37.280 Yeah.

00:45:39.140 So here's

00:45:40.000 what we

00:45:40.240 know about

00:45:40.880 Soros 0.94

00:45:42.100 funding.

00:45:43.260 So Soros

00:45:44.020 doesn't know

00:45:44.860 Bragg,

00:45:45.400 never met

00:45:45.940 him,

00:45:46.280 never recommended

00:45:47.040 him, but

00:45:47.920 he did give

00:45:48.480 money to a

00:45:50.060 political action

00:45:51.060 committee that

00:45:52.200 gave some of

00:45:52.940 that money,

00:45:53.920 $500,000,

00:45:55.340 to support

00:45:56.260 Bragg's

00:45:56.720 candidacy.

00:45:57.880 And we do

00:45:58.300 know that

00:45:58.760 Soros has 0.98

00:46:00.880 been involved

00:46:01.440 with funding

00:46:02.060 progressive

00:46:02.740 candidates.

00:46:04.000 So it's

00:46:05.500 not technically

00:46:06.340 true that

00:46:07.220 Soros hired 0.94

00:46:08.600 Bragg,

00:46:09.500 essentially.

00:46:10.340 It's more

00:46:11.220 true that

00:46:11.880 Soros does 0.99

00:46:12.600 things that

00:46:13.220 guarantees you

00:46:13.980 get a

00:46:14.980 Bragg.

00:46:18.100 Anthony

00:46:18.820 Sherman

00:46:19.240 asked this

00:46:19.840 question in

00:46:20.400 all caps.

00:46:21.880 May I

00:46:22.780 repeat his

00:46:23.340 question?

00:46:24.680 Anthony

00:46:25.020 asks in

00:46:26.100 all caps,

00:46:27.020 Scott,

00:46:27.800 aren't you

00:46:28.320 a fellow

00:46:28.760 Jew?

00:46:30.260 Anthony,

00:46:31.380 really?

00:46:32.840 We're going

00:46:33.180 to get rid

00:46:33.520 of you,

00:46:33.800 Anthony.

00:46:38.200 You know,

00:46:39.300 thank God

00:46:40.140 for caps.

00:46:41.380 If it

00:46:41.980 were not

00:46:42.280 for the

00:46:42.600 caps lock,

00:46:43.240 you could

00:46:43.620 not identify

00:46:44.440 the truly

00:46:45.200 broken people.

00:46:47.140 Why do

00:46:47.880 all the

00:46:48.300 broken people

00:46:49.060 signal,

00:46:50.500 I'm a

00:46:51.400 mental case,

00:46:52.960 and then

00:46:53.720 they say

00:46:54.080 their message

00:46:54.600 with the

00:46:55.900 all caps.

00:46:57.660 I'm a

00:46:58.400 total mental

00:46:59.020 case,

00:47:00.240 and now

00:47:00.840 here's my

00:47:01.280 message.

00:47:01.660 All

00:47:03.740 right.

00:47:04.640 So,

00:47:05.760 I guess

00:47:06.700 the CNN

00:47:07.340 fact-checking

00:47:08.300 is technically

00:47:09.260 correct,

00:47:11.380 that Soros

00:47:11.980 didn't

00:47:12.320 specifically

00:47:13.060 say he

00:47:13.800 funded this

00:47:14.280 one guy,

00:47:15.340 but it

00:47:16.820 looks like

00:47:17.660 the claim

00:47:18.220 is correct

00:47:18.960 enough.

00:47:20.060 You know,

00:47:20.380 if Soros

00:47:22.060 is giving

00:47:22.940 money that

00:47:24.160 he does

00:47:24.740 intend and

00:47:26.100 knows would

00:47:26.680 go to

00:47:27.100 progressive

00:47:27.820 prosecutors,

00:47:29.180 DAs,

00:47:31.700 and he

00:47:32.060 gets one,

00:47:33.080 and then

00:47:33.380 he gets

00:47:33.660 exactly what

00:47:34.300 you'd expect

00:47:34.780 from one,

00:47:36.580 I don't know,

00:47:37.200 I think the

00:47:37.640 charge is

00:47:38.180 true enough.

00:47:39.340 I'm going

00:47:39.660 to call it

00:47:40.060 true enough,

00:47:41.320 but technically

00:47:43.040 untrue.

00:47:45.160 All right,

00:47:45.500 CNN has an

00:47:46.180 editorial that

00:47:46.920 the word

00:47:47.320 woke is

00:47:48.800 being stolen

00:47:49.460 by largely

00:47:50.740 white people,

00:47:52.380 and really

00:47:53.140 it's a

00:47:53.460 black word.

00:47:55.960 Did you

00:47:56.600 know that?

00:47:57.000 the word

00:47:58.160 woke has

00:47:58.780 been used

00:47:59.320 by black

00:48:01.000 people for

00:48:01.600 a long

00:48:01.900 time in a

00:48:02.460 slightly

00:48:02.760 different way,

00:48:04.680 and I

00:48:05.560 think they

00:48:05.920 used it,

00:48:06.580 let's see,

00:48:07.400 I think they

00:48:07.820 used woke

00:48:08.440 to mean that

00:48:09.880 you were

00:48:10.480 asleep and

00:48:10.980 then you

00:48:11.240 woke up.

00:48:12.720 No,

00:48:13.020 I'm just

00:48:13.380 kidding.

00:48:14.260 They used

00:48:15.120 it to

00:48:15.380 basically

00:48:15.960 keep

00:48:17.480 alert,

00:48:18.780 stay

00:48:19.100 woke,

00:48:19.580 just meant

00:48:20.000 be alert,

00:48:21.280 look over

00:48:22.100 your shoulder.

00:48:24.900 And so

00:48:25.240 an editorial

00:48:28.880 commenter

00:48:29.960 said that

00:48:31.340 maybe the

00:48:31.740 white people

00:48:32.140 should stop

00:48:32.600 using that

00:48:33.060 word that

00:48:33.440 way.

00:48:35.300 They're

00:48:35.780 trying to

00:48:36.040 take your

00:48:36.380 word.

00:48:39.380 Yeah,

00:48:40.260 I think

00:48:41.480 that there's

00:48:42.100 obviously

00:48:42.820 some success

00:48:44.880 by the

00:48:45.500 right pushing

00:48:46.840 back against

00:48:47.620 wokeness,

00:48:48.300 because they

00:48:49.020 wouldn't try

00:48:49.520 to argue

00:48:49.920 that the

00:48:50.360 word doesn't

00:48:50.940 apply unless

00:48:51.880 the challenge

00:48:53.780 to that

00:48:55.100 body of

00:48:55.740 activities was

00:48:56.640 valid.

00:48:57.720 How many

00:48:58.440 times do

00:48:59.740 we end up

00:49:00.220 arguing over

00:49:00.920 the definition

00:49:01.980 of a word?

00:49:04.120 Let's see.

00:49:06.460 So,

00:49:07.380 Trump either

00:49:09.060 committed a

00:49:09.780 crime or he

00:49:10.420 didn't,

00:49:11.520 based on how

00:49:12.140 you define

00:49:12.680 the word

00:49:13.060 find.

00:49:14.680 If you

00:49:15.360 thought find

00:49:16.160 votes meant

00:49:17.620 pretend they

00:49:18.600 were there and

00:49:19.120 make them up,

00:49:20.240 he's a

00:49:20.580 criminal.

00:49:21.880 If you

00:49:22.280 think that

00:49:23.060 somebody who

00:49:23.700 complains that

00:49:24.380 the votes were

00:49:24.980 miscounted says

00:49:26.780 find votes,

00:49:28.280 it means,

00:49:28.920 oh,

00:49:29.160 count them

00:49:29.580 better or

00:49:30.220 make sure you

00:49:30.840 haven't missed

00:49:31.280 any.

00:49:32.960 We're really

00:49:33.680 just arguing

00:49:34.220 about what a

00:49:34.700 word means.

00:49:36.280 How about

00:49:36.800 what does

00:49:40.060 Soros-funded

00:49:41.020 mean?

00:49:41.680 I mean,

00:49:41.920 that's what the

00:49:42.360 conversation is.

00:49:43.860 Does Soros-funded

00:49:45.020 mean directly or

00:49:46.520 does indirectly

00:49:47.180 count?

00:49:47.940 What does

00:49:48.440 woke mean?

00:49:49.680 Now we're

00:49:50.040 arguing what

00:49:50.600 woke means.

00:49:51.200 Now we're

00:49:52.120 arguing what

00:49:52.600 a woman 0.57

00:49:52.920 is.

00:49:54.060 So we

00:49:54.680 can't decide

00:49:55.220 what a

00:49:55.560 woman is,

00:49:56.260 what the

00:49:56.580 word woke

00:49:57.080 means,

00:49:57.840 what Soros-funded

00:49:58.980 means,

00:50:00.100 what the

00:50:00.520 word find

00:50:01.220 means.

00:50:06.760 So I talk

00:50:07.600 about word

00:50:08.180 thinking all

00:50:08.800 the time,

00:50:09.700 which, by the

00:50:10.360 way, you're

00:50:10.720 going to

00:50:10.880 understand a

00:50:11.440 lot better

00:50:11.780 because AI

00:50:12.480 is a word

00:50:13.280 thinker.

00:50:13.700 the way

00:50:15.020 AI thinks

00:50:16.060 is by

00:50:16.820 figuring out

00:50:17.380 the most

00:50:17.740 predictive

00:50:18.200 word that

00:50:18.800 would follow

00:50:19.260 the next

00:50:19.720 sequence

00:50:20.280 that's already

00:50:21.180 there,

00:50:22.100 which is

00:50:23.320 basically

00:50:23.800 thinking by

00:50:24.980 words.

00:50:25.720 If the

00:50:26.260 sentence makes

00:50:26.980 sense, AI

00:50:28.040 thinks it

00:50:28.560 makes sense.

00:50:30.240 That's what

00:50:30.900 people do.

00:50:32.080 When the

00:50:32.480 sentence makes

00:50:33.240 sense, people

00:50:33.940 think that they've

00:50:34.620 talked logic.

00:50:36.040 And you see

00:50:36.540 that all the

00:50:37.020 time.

00:50:37.940 There's a whole

00:50:38.740 group of

00:50:40.400 people in

00:50:40.780 the country

00:50:41.200 who, let's

00:50:42.600 say, would

00:50:43.040 be more

00:50:43.640 close to

00:50:44.280 the artistic

00:50:45.040 side of

00:50:46.960 things than

00:50:47.500 the engineering

00:50:48.140 side of

00:50:48.580 things.

00:50:50.100 The artistic

00:50:51.180 people think

00:50:51.860 that if the

00:50:52.420 sentence makes

00:50:53.200 sense, the

00:50:54.640 idea makes

00:50:55.360 sense.

00:50:56.420 It does

00:50:56.840 not.

00:50:58.340 It does

00:50:59.000 not.

00:50:59.920 It's just a

00:51:00.600 sentence that

00:51:01.860 could be

00:51:02.260 understood.

00:51:03.500 If the

00:51:03.920 sentence could

00:51:04.480 be understood,

00:51:05.140 you didn't

00:51:05.420 make a point.

00:51:06.740 You just

00:51:07.140 said a

00:51:07.480 sentence that

00:51:08.020 could be

00:51:08.280 understood.

00:51:09.120 And they

00:51:09.520 can't tell

00:51:09.940 the difference.

00:51:11.000 They actually

00:51:11.520 can't tell

00:51:11.960 the difference.

00:51:13.200 An engineer

00:51:13.820 can tell

00:51:14.220 the difference.

00:51:15.100 Oh, the

00:51:15.480 sentence makes

00:51:16.140 sense, but

00:51:17.520 the idea

00:51:18.260 doesn't.

00:51:20.620 Yeah, you

00:51:21.000 see it all

00:51:21.340 the time.

00:51:22.740 All right.

00:51:24.020 Here's my

00:51:25.680 last AI

00:51:26.360 story.

00:51:27.940 I believe

00:51:28.440 that copyrights

00:51:29.640 will become

00:51:30.740 worthless because

00:51:31.780 of AI.

00:51:33.280 Here's why.

00:51:35.520 If in the

00:51:36.340 current model,

00:51:37.040 I say, I

00:51:37.640 would like this

00:51:38.200 book by

00:51:38.900 Scott.

00:51:40.720 So you'd

00:51:41.340 say, oh, I

00:51:42.460 guess I

00:51:42.740 got to buy

00:51:43.100 it because

00:51:43.400 it's copyrighted.

00:51:44.280 So you buy

00:51:44.700 it.

00:51:46.140 In the AI

00:51:46.940 world, here's

00:51:48.200 what you're

00:51:48.520 going to say.

00:51:49.780 I'd like a

00:51:50.580 book by Scott.

00:51:51.640 Hey, AI, can

00:51:52.400 you go read

00:51:52.880 that book and

00:51:53.520 summarize it for

00:51:54.920 me?

00:51:55.580 Or just read

00:51:56.400 it to me in

00:51:57.360 your own words.

00:51:59.060 Is that a

00:51:59.720 copyright problem?

00:52:01.720 Maybe.

00:52:02.620 But how would

00:52:03.140 you ever know?

00:52:03.720 If you told

00:52:05.500 AI to go read

00:52:06.400 a book and

00:52:07.320 then read it

00:52:07.880 to you like

00:52:08.380 it was reading

00:52:08.880 an audio

00:52:09.260 book to

00:52:09.680 you, who 0.93

00:52:10.480 would know

00:52:10.840 besides you?

00:52:13.020 Nobody would

00:52:13.660 know.

00:52:15.340 You could

00:52:15.980 turn any

00:52:16.440 book into

00:52:16.880 an audio

00:52:17.280 book just

00:52:18.680 by telling

00:52:19.140 AI to read

00:52:19.800 it to you.

00:52:20.860 If AI can

00:52:21.940 see it, and

00:52:23.680 every book

00:52:24.640 will be

00:52:25.280 digitized,

00:52:26.020 right?

00:52:26.280 Every book

00:52:26.780 will be

00:52:27.140 digitized.

00:52:28.180 And every

00:52:28.700 book will be

00:52:29.540 illegally

00:52:30.220 available

00:52:31.500 somewhere.

00:52:32.980 Somewhere it

00:52:33.860 will be

00:52:34.100 illegally

00:52:34.520 available,

00:52:35.260 even if

00:52:35.680 copyrighted.

00:52:37.040 So copyrights

00:52:38.440 will be

00:52:38.780 absolutely

00:52:39.340 useless.

00:52:40.420 Let's say

00:52:40.940 there's a

00:52:41.360 movie that

00:52:43.480 AI could

00:52:44.480 have access

00:52:44.980 to but you

00:52:45.740 haven't seen.

00:52:46.820 You don't

00:52:47.140 think AI

00:52:47.740 could just

00:52:48.200 reproduce the

00:52:48.880 movie for

00:52:49.380 you?

00:52:50.260 It might

00:52:50.560 not be

00:52:50.900 exactly the

00:52:51.500 same, but

00:52:52.500 if AI has

00:52:53.240 watched the

00:52:53.740 movie or

00:52:54.620 it has

00:52:54.920 access to

00:52:55.500 it, it

00:52:56.480 could go

00:52:56.780 get it.

00:52:57.700 Or how

00:52:58.260 about this?

00:52:59.340 You say

00:52:59.720 to AI,

00:53:00.400 AI,

00:53:01.500 I'd like

00:53:01.940 you to

00:53:02.400 give me

00:53:02.660 a new

00:53:02.980 Marvel

00:53:03.480 superhero

00:53:04.320 movie.

00:53:05.240 Make it

00:53:05.620 unique,

00:53:06.500 put it

00:53:06.860 in the

00:53:07.220 style of

00:53:07.960 maybe I

00:53:08.420 mentioned

00:53:08.700 a writer,

00:53:09.400 a writer,

00:53:10.100 a producer,

00:53:10.680 put it in

00:53:11.500 the style of

00:53:12.040 this producer

00:53:12.680 and this

00:53:13.200 writer,

00:53:14.120 make it

00:53:14.620 new content.

00:53:15.480 I like

00:53:15.780 a little

00:53:16.040 more focus

00:53:16.740 on Captain

00:53:18.800 America.

00:53:19.700 I like

00:53:19.960 him featured

00:53:20.420 a little bit

00:53:20.900 more.

00:53:22.020 And can

00:53:22.300 you replace

00:53:23.040 Iron Man

00:53:25.560 with, you

00:53:25.960 know,

00:53:26.400 and then you

00:53:27.280 would watch

00:53:27.680 an entire

00:53:28.320 two and a

00:53:29.080 half hour

00:53:29.460 movie,

00:53:30.580 fully scripted,

00:53:31.480 fully scripted.

00:53:35.140 And it

00:53:35.700 could be as

00:53:36.180 good as

00:53:36.740 or better

00:53:37.220 than the

00:53:37.660 ones that

00:53:38.120 Hollywood

00:53:38.420 made.

00:53:39.340 You know

00:53:39.640 why it

00:53:39.920 could be

00:53:40.200 better?

00:53:41.060 Because you

00:53:41.520 could say

00:53:41.920 don't make

00:53:42.480 it woke

00:53:42.960 or whatever

00:53:43.920 words you

00:53:44.500 need for

00:53:44.800 AI.

00:53:45.600 Don't make

00:53:46.080 it woke,

00:53:46.900 make it

00:53:47.280 more realistic.

00:53:48.840 And then

00:53:49.080 suddenly you

00:53:50.280 could have

00:53:50.560 a movie

00:53:50.920 without the

00:53:51.460 wokeness.

00:53:52.340 Or how

00:53:52.700 about this?

00:53:53.780 Let's say

00:53:54.180 you bought

00:53:54.560 a movie so

00:53:55.220 it's available

00:53:55.800 to you,

00:53:56.340 you own it.

00:53:57.360 So you

00:53:57.700 say,

00:53:57.980 AI,

00:53:58.960 can you

00:53:59.300 take the

00:53:59.700 wokeness

00:54:00.160 out of

00:54:00.400 this movie?

00:54:01.180 Just remove

00:54:01.800 all the

00:54:02.100 woke parts.

00:54:03.140 And then it

00:54:03.540 just gives

00:54:03.900 you back

00:54:04.200 the movie

00:54:04.580 without the

00:54:05.080 woke parts.

00:54:06.560 Yeah,

00:54:07.180 that's going

00:54:07.560 to happen.

00:54:08.400 So I

00:54:09.080 don't see

00:54:09.500 any,

00:54:10.220 I can't

00:54:10.720 see any

00:54:11.280 world in

00:54:12.100 which copyrights

00:54:13.000 can last

00:54:13.580 more than

00:54:13.960 the next

00:54:14.240 few years.

00:54:15.260 Would you

00:54:15.740 disagree?

00:54:16.040 It might be

00:54:18.120 that some

00:54:18.540 things are

00:54:18.920 still copyrighted,

00:54:20.740 but AI

00:54:21.340 could so

00:54:22.060 easily imitate

00:54:23.060 them or

00:54:24.360 steal them

00:54:25.980 without anybody

00:54:26.700 knowing that

00:54:27.980 it would have

00:54:29.240 no value.

00:54:30.220 You wouldn't

00:54:30.500 be able to,

00:54:32.920 there's just

00:54:33.760 no way you'd

00:54:34.280 be able to

00:54:34.940 detect it

00:54:35.740 and enforce

00:54:38.000 it.

00:54:39.060 So I think

00:54:39.800 that my job

00:54:41.140 probably only

00:54:41.800 has two

00:54:44.920 to three

00:54:45.340 years left.

00:54:47.620 You know,

00:54:47.920 my job.

00:54:48.700 So at the

00:54:49.140 moment,

00:54:49.880 AI can't

00:54:50.500 write humor.

00:54:51.800 Some people

00:54:52.320 say it did

00:54:53.280 some funny

00:54:53.720 things,

00:54:54.020 but it

00:54:54.300 really

00:54:54.480 didn't.

00:54:55.620 The one

00:54:56.040 reason that

00:54:56.580 I can

00:54:56.880 still write

00:54:57.500 humor better

00:54:58.060 than AI

00:54:58.740 is that I

00:55:00.400 haven't taught

00:55:00.960 AI how to

00:55:01.500 write humor

00:55:01.920 yet.

00:55:02.980 If I do,

00:55:04.920 it could

00:55:05.480 probably beat

00:55:06.120 me pretty

00:55:06.540 quickly,

00:55:07.380 but it

00:55:08.020 doesn't know

00:55:08.460 the formula.

00:55:10.120 The only

00:55:10.880 person who

00:55:11.360 knows the

00:55:11.700 formula is

00:55:12.160 me,

00:55:13.200 because I

00:55:13.660 wrote a

00:55:14.900 formula,

00:55:15.340 the six

00:55:15.900 dimensions

00:55:16.300 of humor,

00:55:17.180 and if

00:55:17.440 you use

00:55:17.740 that formula

00:55:18.300 or you

00:55:18.920 teach,

00:55:19.520 if you

00:55:19.900 taught AI

00:55:20.600 what that

00:55:21.100 formula was,

00:55:22.480 it could

00:55:22.860 write jokes

00:55:23.380 pretty

00:55:24.160 quickly.

00:55:25.380 But there's

00:55:26.060 one thing

00:55:26.480 it can't

00:55:26.920 do,

00:55:28.200 which you

00:55:28.580 can't judge

00:55:29.400 whether its

00:55:30.340 joke is

00:55:30.820 funny.

00:55:32.320 That's

00:55:32.800 something I

00:55:33.220 can still

00:55:33.680 do that the

00:55:34.220 computer can't

00:55:34.920 do.

00:55:35.660 So if I'm

00:55:36.180 writing a

00:55:36.620 joke and I

00:55:37.820 get to my

00:55:38.440 final punchline

00:55:39.800 and I look at

00:55:40.520 it and go,

00:55:41.400 eh, it

00:55:42.700 doesn't make

00:55:43.120 me laugh,

00:55:44.320 so I don't

00:55:44.720 think it'll

00:55:45.040 make you

00:55:45.380 laugh.

00:55:45.720 So I

00:55:46.460 erase it,

00:55:47.340 try something

00:55:47.820 else, try

00:55:48.840 something else,

00:55:49.980 try something

00:55:50.600 else, and

00:55:51.180 then I

00:55:51.460 laugh.

00:55:52.260 I literally

00:55:52.700 laugh at

00:55:53.240 it.

00:55:53.560 Oh, that's

00:55:54.600 good.

00:55:55.580 Then I

00:55:56.060 know you're

00:55:56.460 going to

00:55:56.660 laugh too.

00:55:57.680 The computer

00:55:58.320 can't do

00:55:58.760 that yet.

00:55:59.980 But it

00:56:00.440 will.

00:56:01.860 Certainly

00:56:02.300 it will.

00:56:03.400 All it

00:56:03.960 would need

00:56:04.400 is a huge

00:56:05.280 body of

00:56:06.140 jokes, and

00:56:07.860 it would

00:56:08.140 need to

00:56:08.520 rank them

00:56:09.060 by how

00:56:09.480 much humans

00:56:10.120 actually laughed

00:56:10.880 at each

00:56:11.240 joke, and

00:56:12.320 then it

00:56:12.600 would know

00:56:12.920 what kinds

00:56:13.540 of patterns

00:56:14.220 make people

00:56:14.880 laugh.

00:56:15.780 And then

00:56:16.500 with the

00:56:17.100 six dimensions

00:56:17.700 of humor,

00:56:18.820 it could

00:56:19.300 create its

00:56:19.840 own potential

00:56:21.160 jokes, and

00:56:22.560 then once it

00:56:23.080 created it, it

00:56:23.800 could bash it

00:56:24.360 against its

00:56:24.900 database of

00:56:26.400 patterns that

00:56:27.140 actually worked

00:56:27.940 for human

00:56:28.560 beings, and

00:56:30.700 it could write

00:56:31.120 jokes.

00:56:32.500 It can't be

00:56:33.280 more than a

00:56:33.780 year away.

00:56:35.440 So I think

00:56:36.140 my job is

00:56:36.820 obsolete pretty

00:56:38.080 soon.

00:56:39.220 That's what I

00:56:39.920 think.

00:56:41.700 So here's

00:56:43.320 another

00:56:43.600 surprise for

00:56:44.440 you.

00:56:46.280 Do you

00:56:46.740 like

00:56:46.940 audiobooks, and

00:56:47.840 you like

00:56:48.180 them when

00:56:48.440 the author

00:56:48.880 reads them,

00:56:49.440 right?

00:56:50.160 Well, here's

00:56:50.800 something you

00:56:51.300 maybe didn't

00:56:52.100 know.

00:56:53.160 There are a

00:56:53.660 few things

00:56:54.200 that an

00:56:54.560 author hates

00:56:55.460 more than

00:56:57.840 recording an

00:56:58.540 audiobook.

00:56:59.860 It is

00:57:00.540 really, really

00:57:01.360 unpleasant.

00:57:02.100 It's the

00:57:02.380 thing I hate

00:57:02.880 more than

00:57:03.240 anything I

00:57:04.000 do.

00:57:05.220 Anything,

00:57:06.020 actually.

00:57:07.380 Literally

00:57:07.820 anything.

00:57:08.460 It's the

00:57:08.860 most hated

00:57:09.380 thing I

00:57:09.780 do.

00:57:10.300 It's like

00:57:10.680 three days

00:57:11.360 of just, or

00:57:12.580 four days

00:57:13.200 of hell

00:57:14.520 just talking

00:57:16.180 into a

00:57:16.540 microphone and

00:57:17.440 trying to

00:57:18.240 get every

00:57:18.600 word right

00:57:19.300 and thinking

00:57:20.040 and concentrating

00:57:20.720 too hard.

00:57:21.300 It's terrible.

00:57:22.440 Do you

00:57:22.740 know what I

00:57:23.300 could do

00:57:23.700 now?

00:57:24.800 I could use

00:57:25.780 one of

00:57:26.580 several AI

00:57:27.420 products that

00:57:28.180 already exist.

00:57:29.760 I can feed

00:57:30.440 it the text

00:57:31.060 of my book,

00:57:31.900 and it will

00:57:32.820 read it in

00:57:33.840 a perfect

00:57:34.500 impression of

00:57:35.340 me.

00:57:35.780 of me.

00:57:40.000 It would

00:57:40.720 be irrational

00:57:41.980 for me to

00:57:42.640 ever record

00:57:43.360 an audiobook

00:57:43.860 again.

00:57:45.480 I'm never

00:57:46.140 going to

00:57:46.420 do it.

00:57:47.900 There will

00:57:48.580 be audiobooks

00:57:49.360 of mine,

00:57:49.740 but I'm

00:57:50.000 never going

00:57:50.340 to record

00:57:50.700 one again.

00:57:51.300 It wouldn't

00:57:51.620 make sense.

00:57:53.080 Because the

00:57:53.860 computer can

00:57:54.560 actually just

00:57:55.120 do a better

00:57:55.540 job of

00:57:56.040 me than

00:57:57.460 I can do

00:57:58.300 of me.

00:57:59.760 Because if

00:58:00.460 they can

00:58:01.060 match me

00:58:01.720 for a

00:58:03.580 sentence or

00:58:04.160 two,

00:58:04.400 then it

00:58:05.660 can perfectly

00:58:06.360 match me

00:58:06.920 for the

00:58:07.420 whole book.

00:58:08.420 And it

00:58:08.660 can certainly

00:58:09.200 match me

00:58:09.680 for a

00:58:10.500 paragraph or

00:58:10.980 two.

00:58:12.480 But if I

00:58:13.380 do it

00:58:13.640 myself,

00:58:14.900 I can

00:58:15.320 also perfectly

00:58:16.180 match myself

00:58:16.960 for a

00:58:17.280 paragraph,

00:58:18.100 but my

00:58:18.720 voice starts

00:58:19.300 wearing out

00:58:19.940 and my

00:58:20.260 energy gets

00:58:20.840 lower as

00:58:21.480 I record.

00:58:22.540 So I

00:58:23.220 would never

00:58:23.720 be able to

00:58:24.320 record as

00:58:24.940 well as

00:58:25.500 AI can

00:58:26.340 already

00:58:27.060 imitate my

00:58:29.380 voice.

00:58:30.780 AI already

00:58:31.880 speaks to

00:58:32.700 Scott better

00:58:33.540 than Scott

00:58:34.060 does.

00:58:34.540 A lot

00:58:34.800 better.

00:58:35.680 For long

00:58:36.760 form, a

00:58:37.580 lot better.

00:58:38.040 It's not

00:58:38.220 even close.

00:58:41.500 Imperfections

00:58:41.980 need to be

00:58:42.460 built in?

00:58:43.040 Maybe.

00:58:44.580 Maybe.

00:58:45.680 Imperfections

00:58:46.180 don't need to

00:58:46.780 be built in

00:58:47.300 when you

00:58:47.620 buy a

00:58:48.280 form of

00:58:49.540 music.

00:58:50.520 If you

00:58:50.960 go to a

00:58:51.340 concert,

00:58:52.360 there's

00:58:52.600 imperfection

00:58:53.260 in the

00:58:53.540 performance.

00:58:54.640 If you

00:58:55.240 buy the

00:58:56.720 streaming

00:58:57.600 music that

00:58:58.940 was made

00:58:59.340 in a

00:58:59.800 studio,

00:59:00.900 studio,

00:59:03.000 the studio

00:59:03.040 players are

00:59:11.920 sometimes

00:59:12.380 fairly often

00:59:14.020 not even

00:59:15.080 the artists

00:59:15.600 who made

00:59:16.160 the album

00:59:16.760 because the

00:59:18.140 artists who

00:59:18.640 play it live

00:59:19.380 have a real

00:59:21.060 tough time

00:59:21.840 playing it

00:59:22.280 perfectly.

00:59:22.680 and nobody

00:59:24.020 cares if it's

00:59:24.660 live.

00:59:24.980 But for a

00:59:26.640 studio album,

00:59:28.420 you need

00:59:29.040 professional

00:59:30.040 musicians to

00:59:31.600 pretend to be

00:59:32.360 the people who

00:59:32.940 made the

00:59:33.280 album because

00:59:34.220 they can play

00:59:34.680 it perfectly.

00:59:35.160 so it's

00:59:37.140 going to be

00:59:37.400 like that.

00:59:38.880 AI will be

00:59:39.900 your long

00:59:40.840 form speaker.

00:59:45.680 And then

00:59:46.640 certainly for

00:59:48.380 humans doing

00:59:49.740 anything like

00:59:50.360 this, we'll

00:59:51.440 have makeup

00:59:52.040 applied by a

00:59:53.740 filter.

00:59:54.880 Isn't it weird

00:59:55.480 that Zoom

00:59:56.020 doesn't already

00:59:56.560 have a makeup

00:59:57.120 filter?

00:59:58.360 Isn't that the

00:59:58.900 most obvious

00:59:59.600 thing Zoom

01:00:00.200 should have?

01:00:01.700 Where I just

01:00:02.140 hit a button

01:00:02.580 and I've got

01:00:03.340 full makeup

01:00:04.800 on?

01:00:06.140 Yeah.

01:00:08.060 All right.

01:00:11.820 Maybe I am

01:00:12.780 AI already.

01:00:17.060 All right.

01:00:17.840 Has anybody

01:00:18.300 used my

01:00:19.480 insult yet

01:00:20.200 that something

01:00:21.060 is GPT-1

01:00:22.300 quality?

01:00:24.200 I told the

01:00:25.160 locals people

01:00:25.800 this.

01:00:26.120 This is our

01:00:26.560 new insult.

01:00:27.300 I'll tell the

01:00:27.900 people on

01:00:28.600 YouTube.

01:00:29.440 If you see

01:00:30.320 somebody who's

01:00:30.860 just being

01:00:31.260 dumb,

01:00:32.720 a good

01:00:33.320 insult that's

01:00:34.800 very timely

01:00:35.380 is, yeah,

01:00:36.580 that's some

01:00:37.500 GPT-1 stuff

01:00:39.640 right there.

01:00:41.240 Yeah,

01:00:41.540 come back to

01:00:42.780 me when you

01:00:43.220 can get up

01:00:43.720 to GPT-2

01:00:45.020 and I'll

01:00:46.200 listen to you.

01:00:47.200 GPT-3, I

01:00:48.420 might be

01:00:48.760 interested.

01:00:49.820 GPT-4, I

01:00:50.920 might even

01:00:51.320 believe you.

01:00:52.460 But GPT-1,

01:00:53.680 no, not so

01:00:54.780 much.

01:00:57.960 All right.

01:00:58.620 Yeah, that's

01:00:59.520 a GPT-1

01:01:00.400 quality

01:01:00.820 performance.

01:01:01.720 That's

01:01:01.780 combining all

01:01:03.460 the insults.

01:01:05.140 All right.

01:01:06.820 Ladies and 0.98

01:01:07.620 gentlemen,

01:01:11.220 this

01:01:12.040 completes my

01:01:14.040 presentation and

01:01:15.000 YouTube, thanks

01:01:15.820 for joining.

01:01:17.060 I'll talk to

01:01:17.660 you tomorrow.

01:01:19.880 I'll be

01:01:20.400 doing

01:01:20.540 Without

01:01:20.920 shadow.

01:01:23.300 You

01:01:24.080 may

01:01:36.900 not

01:01:37.600 옛날

01:01:38.460 and

01:01:39.360 I

01:01:39.640 may

01:01:39.800 may

01:01:40.560 who

01:01:41.620 may

01:01:41.960 know.

01:01:42.660 You

01:01:43.560 may

01:01:44.640 or you

01:01:44.920 may

01:01:45.660 may

01:01:46.760 act

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - April 05, 2023

Episode 2069 Scott Adams： Trump Arraignment, AI Rewrites History More Woke, Escape Cities

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript