Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2084 Scott Adams： Starship Launch, Hunter's Whistleblower, AI Bias, Can AI Be Hypnotized？

00:00:00.000 Doo Doo Doo Doo Doo Doo Doo Doo Doo Doo Doo Doo

00:00:03.340 Doo Doo Doo Doo Doo Doo

00:00:05.240 Good morning everybody and welcome to the Highlight of civilization.

00:00:11.040 And it really is.

00:00:12.380 Today does feel like the highlight of civilization.

00:00:15.220 It's a great day.

00:00:16.820 I'm so happy.

00:00:18.180 And I think you will be too.

00:00:19.900 Because by the time you get done with this live stream,

00:00:23.220 oh your dopamine is going to be flowing.

00:00:26.060 Your oxytocin will be off the charts.

00:00:28.240 If you need a little testosterone, I got it.

00:00:32.260 I got it here for you.

00:00:33.880 And all you need to get all of those benefits

00:00:36.060 is a cup or a mug or a glass,

00:00:38.320 a tanker, a tanker, a chalice, a stein,

00:00:41.220 a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:44.580 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:47.000 I like coffee.

00:00:48.520 And join me now for some un...

00:00:51.240 Join me now for the simultaneous sip

00:00:55.440 or something like that.

00:00:56.820 Go.

00:00:58.240 Pause. Pause.

00:01:04.820 Don't put down your cup.

00:01:07.120 Do not put down your cup.

00:01:09.400 Today is a special day.

00:01:11.400 How many of you got to watch the launch of the Starship?

00:01:16.420 It just happened.

00:01:17.860 Now, if you didn't see it,

00:01:19.940 the first stage of the test was successful.

00:01:22.880 It launched.

00:01:24.480 They did hope that they would get a separation

00:01:27.060 and then the second part of it would do a little bit of an orbit.

00:01:31.020 But that part did not work.

00:01:34.820 However,

00:01:35.940 however,

00:01:38.340 I'm pretty sure that Elon Musk is a little bit disappointed

00:01:44.680 because it didn't do both parts of the test correctly.

00:01:50.140 However,

00:01:51.140 the first part of the test was very important

00:01:53.800 because it got them data that will help them with the second part of the test,

00:01:56.940 which they will do.

00:01:57.960 And here's what I would like to add to this moment.

00:02:02.940 I can't remember ever being more excited than I was when I was watching the takeoff.

00:02:11.260 Did anybody have that feeling?

00:02:12.400 I don't think I've ever been more excited watching something on television.

00:02:18.320 I've watched the moonwalk live.

00:02:23.780 I'm the age where I got to watch the moonwalk.

00:02:27.500 But I've never been more excited than that launch.

00:02:32.980 And unlike,

00:02:35.540 you know,

00:02:36.220 maybe Elon Musk might be a little disappointed

00:02:39.400 he didn't do the second part of the test

00:02:41.440 or didn't do the second part successfully.

00:02:43.440 But I would like to say that

00:02:46.180 what we love about Elon Musk

00:02:48.860 and maybe about America too

00:02:51.160 is

00:02:52.960 not that it

00:02:54.780 the big story

00:02:56.940 let me just make sure I can frame the story right.

00:03:01.680 The news will be talking about the launch all day long.

00:03:04.540 Let me frame it for you.

00:03:06.120 This is the way you should see it.

00:03:08.240 The amazing thing

00:03:09.740 is not the launch

00:03:11.100 and it's not the fact that it didn't completely succeed.

00:03:15.480 You know what the amazing thing was?

00:03:18.180 That Elon Musk knew

00:03:19.540 there was a good, good chance

00:03:21.940 it was going to blow up

00:03:23.020 and he did it anyway.

00:03:26.320 He did it anyway.

00:03:29.020 That's everything.

00:03:30.840 That's everything.

00:03:32.460 The story is not about the technology

00:03:34.300 which was amazing.

00:03:36.100 The story is not that

00:03:37.120 half of it worked and half of it didn't.

00:03:39.500 That's just the detail.

00:03:41.100 The amazing part of the story

00:03:43.080 is that he knew

00:03:45.000 it would probably blow up

00:03:46.320 in front of the whole damn world

00:03:48.180 and he did it anyway.

00:03:50.820 Wow.

00:03:52.240 Here's him.

00:03:53.020 That was inspiring.

00:04:06.800 Are you ready for the best 420 story

00:04:09.320 of all time?

00:04:10.920 Now I don't know if this is true

00:04:12.660 and it doesn't matter.

00:04:15.980 Does it?

00:04:16.740 It probably won't matter at all

00:04:18.220 if it's true.

00:04:18.740 But you know actor

00:04:21.020 Woody Harrelson

00:04:25.240 and you know

00:04:27.720 McConaughey, right?

00:04:29.640 What's his name?

00:04:30.840 Matthew McConaughey.

00:04:32.840 So just think about

00:04:34.080 both of those actors

00:04:35.100 for a moment.

00:04:36.720 Hold them in your mind.

00:04:37.960 Woody Harrelson

00:04:38.860 Woody Harrelson

00:04:40.780 and Matthew McConaughey.

00:04:42.980 Well it turns out

00:04:44.840 that because they're both

00:04:46.120 famous actors

00:04:46.940 and they're also

00:04:47.820 going to be in some kind of

00:04:49.460 project upcoming.

00:04:52.360 True detective

00:04:53.060 is that what it is?

00:04:54.240 So they know each other

00:04:55.480 and they're

00:04:56.040 good friends.

00:04:58.560 You know

00:04:58.820 off screen

00:04:59.380 they're friends.

00:05:00.360 And one day

00:05:00.820 they were hanging out

00:05:01.580 at some sporting event

00:05:03.720 and Matthew McConaughey's

00:05:05.880 mother was there.

00:05:06.560 And

00:05:08.740 apparently

00:05:10.380 she let slip

00:05:11.500 a little tidbit

00:05:13.440 that makes it possible

00:05:15.540 that she is

00:05:17.540 the mother

00:05:17.900 of both of them.

00:05:22.780 So

00:05:23.380 apparently

00:05:24.420 they might be brothers.

00:05:26.840 Now it's

00:05:27.600 unconfirmed

00:05:28.480 but they both

00:05:29.740 see it

00:05:30.200 like once

00:05:31.380 it became

00:05:32.940 a possibility.

00:05:34.740 I think

00:05:34.920 and you see

00:05:35.920 the picture

00:05:36.540 of them

00:05:36.820 standing

00:05:37.140 next to each other

00:05:38.060 and as soon

00:05:39.400 as you see

00:05:39.900 them standing

00:05:40.400 next to each other

00:05:41.300 and then you think

00:05:42.480 about both

00:05:43.020 of their personalities

00:05:43.960 and you know

00:05:45.560 that apparently

00:05:46.340 their mother

00:05:47.080 knew both

00:05:49.220 of the fathers

00:05:49.880 and the timing

00:05:51.420 lined up

00:05:52.160 when one of them

00:05:53.400 was not with

00:05:54.300 the other father

00:05:55.560 and one was

00:05:56.860 in town

00:05:57.360 and they didn't

00:05:59.060 apparently

00:05:59.600 the mother

00:06:00.060 knew both

00:06:00.520 of the fathers.

00:06:02.040 Let's put it

00:06:02.480 this way.

00:06:03.180 The thing

00:06:03.580 that's confirmed

00:06:04.220 is that

00:06:05.220 the mom

00:06:05.940 knew

00:06:06.760 both

00:06:07.200 of their

00:06:07.480 fathers.

00:06:11.280 Anyway

00:06:11.920 that's just

00:06:13.780 your perfect

00:06:14.300 420 story

00:06:15.320 but it gets

00:06:16.260 better.

00:06:18.340 So

00:06:18.940 last night

00:06:19.740 I was

00:06:21.060 listening in

00:06:22.840 on one

00:06:23.560 of the great

00:06:24.100 spaces events

00:06:27.280 on Twitter

00:06:28.220 and wow

00:06:29.740 was it good.

00:06:30.740 It was

00:06:30.940 some of the

00:06:31.540 smartest people

00:06:32.200 I've ever heard

00:06:32.780 in my life

00:06:33.440 talking about

00:06:34.600 AI.

00:06:35.940 Now

00:06:36.260 when I say

00:06:37.540 smartest people

00:06:38.560 it's just

00:06:39.640 some of the

00:06:40.080 smartest people

00:06:40.660 I've ever

00:06:41.380 ever experienced

00:06:42.280 in the same

00:06:42.980 place

00:06:43.280 at the same

00:06:43.700 time.

00:06:44.600 It was

00:06:45.000 unbelievable

00:06:46.280 just having it

00:06:47.440 in my

00:06:47.880 earbuds

00:06:48.780 and

00:06:49.280 listening to

00:06:50.700 one person

00:06:51.360 after another

00:06:51.940 was just

00:06:52.420 freaking

00:06:53.020 brilliant.

00:06:54.580 And Brian

00:06:55.100 Romelli

00:06:55.560 I always

00:06:55.940 recommend him

00:06:56.700 he's the guy

00:06:58.080 you've got to

00:06:58.580 follow.

00:06:59.560 If you don't

00:07:00.280 want AI

00:07:00.800 to sneak up

00:07:01.720 and kick you

00:07:02.180 in the ass

00:07:02.680 you've got to

00:07:03.820 follow him

00:07:04.320 he's way ahead

00:07:05.420 of everything.

00:07:06.540 So

00:07:06.740 I'll tell you

00:07:08.640 some of the

00:07:08.940 things that

00:07:09.360 came out of

00:07:09.840 that.

00:07:11.120 Number one

00:07:11.880 here's my

00:07:13.360 conclusion

00:07:13.900 sort of

00:07:14.760 summarizing

00:07:15.500 or my

00:07:16.340 opinion based

00:07:16.880 on what I

00:07:17.240 heard.

00:07:17.420 number one

00:07:20.200 is AI

00:07:21.420 is never

00:07:21.920 going to be

00:07:22.340 unbiased.

00:07:23.840 Do you

00:07:24.160 know that?

00:07:25.740 It's not

00:07:26.460 even a

00:07:26.780 possibility

00:07:27.320 because it's

00:07:28.940 trained on

00:07:29.880 human patterns

00:07:31.380 of language.

00:07:32.440 They're called

00:07:33.260 LLMs or

00:07:34.660 large language

00:07:35.680 models.

00:07:36.680 It doesn't

00:07:37.460 think it

00:07:38.760 just looks for

00:07:39.380 the same

00:07:39.820 patterns that

00:07:41.360 would be

00:07:41.680 common to

00:07:42.180 human usage.

00:07:44.020 So I've

00:07:44.880 developed a

00:07:45.980 hypothesis

00:07:47.680 and I'm

00:07:49.220 going to

00:07:49.400 call it

00:07:49.720 the

00:07:49.940 Adam's

00:07:50.500 law of

00:07:50.960 AI.

00:07:52.400 You ready

00:07:53.080 for this?

00:07:53.940 So here's

00:07:54.340 the Adam's

00:07:54.960 law of

00:07:55.340 AI.

00:07:56.800 There's a

00:07:57.620 natural

00:07:58.040 limit to

00:08:00.880 how smart

00:08:02.260 AI can get

00:08:03.260 and that

00:08:04.200 natural limit

00:08:05.080 is the

00:08:06.080 smartest

00:08:06.400 human.

00:08:08.140 So AI

00:08:08.720 will be

00:08:09.320 way smarter

00:08:10.120 than almost

00:08:11.520 all humans

00:08:12.280 at almost

00:08:12.820 all things

00:08:13.520 but then it

00:08:14.820 can't get

00:08:15.360 smarter than

00:08:15.920 the smartest

00:08:16.380 human.

00:08:17.840 It can

00:08:18.540 give faster,

00:08:20.120 right?

00:08:20.780 Let's be

00:08:21.180 careful.

00:08:22.220 It can

00:08:22.580 give faster

00:08:23.420 which turns

00:08:24.860 out to be a

00:08:25.360 huge advantage

00:08:25.980 so it would

00:08:27.080 look like

00:08:27.520 intelligence

00:08:28.020 in its own

00:08:29.000 way.

00:08:29.700 But I don't

00:08:30.480 think it

00:08:30.920 can get

00:08:31.460 smarter.

00:08:33.160 And when I

00:08:33.600 say smarter

00:08:34.280 I don't mean

00:08:35.600 doing math

00:08:36.640 or maybe

00:08:37.420 searching

00:08:37.900 through things

00:08:38.520 quicker

00:08:38.920 which it

00:08:40.340 will do

00:08:40.580 very well.

00:08:41.760 I mean

00:08:42.340 it won't

00:08:42.840 be able to

00:08:43.280 understand

00:08:43.780 its environment

00:08:44.620 and interpret

00:08:45.960 it any

00:08:47.140 better than

00:08:47.660 the best

00:08:48.060 person can

00:08:48.700 do it

00:08:49.140 because it

00:08:50.140 won't have

00:08:50.480 any way

00:08:50.960 to do

00:08:51.240 that.

00:08:51.940 I don't

00:08:52.140 think you

00:08:52.520 can look

00:08:53.800 at language

00:08:54.360 of humans

00:08:55.000 and then

00:08:55.700 with that

00:08:56.740 alone

00:08:57.220 go to a

00:08:58.920 higher level

00:08:59.420 of intelligence.

00:09:00.540 It's just

00:09:01.160 going to be

00:09:01.460 the average

00:09:01.940 or the

00:09:02.660 preponderance

00:09:03.880 or the

00:09:04.220 consensus

00:09:04.740 or some

00:09:06.220 clever

00:09:06.880 algorithm

00:09:07.520 of just

00:09:08.140 people talk.

00:09:09.500 that's all

00:09:10.520 it can

00:09:10.740 do.

00:09:12.400 And so

00:09:12.900 one of the

00:09:14.320 questions you

00:09:14.840 might ask

00:09:15.200 yourself is

00:09:15.780 what subset

00:09:17.440 of human

00:09:18.360 activities or

00:09:19.280 conversations

00:09:20.000 is it using

00:09:21.200 to train

00:09:21.700 itself?

00:09:22.600 Well let me

00:09:23.020 tell you.

00:09:24.440 Wouldn't you

00:09:24.840 like to know?

00:09:26.040 It turns out

00:09:26.560 that the

00:09:26.980 Washington

00:09:28.140 Post

00:09:29.120 looked into

00:09:30.660 it and

00:09:31.180 tried to

00:09:31.760 figure out

00:09:32.300 where it

00:09:32.980 was getting

00:09:33.320 most of

00:09:33.760 its data.

00:09:35.100 and I

00:09:37.500 of course

00:09:37.920 wrote that

00:09:38.380 down and

00:09:38.820 can't find

00:09:39.340 it in my

00:09:39.700 notes but

00:09:40.120 the bottom

00:09:40.880 line is that

00:09:41.640 it's the

00:09:42.300 New York

00:09:43.620 Times,

00:09:44.740 Washington

00:09:45.080 Post,

00:09:46.060 here it

00:09:46.500 is.

00:09:47.680 So by

00:09:48.100 half of

00:09:48.500 the top

00:09:48.840 ten sites

00:09:49.620 this is

00:09:50.120 from

00:09:50.500 Washington

00:09:50.880 Post

00:09:51.140 reporting,

00:09:52.180 half of

00:09:52.680 the top

00:09:53.000 ten sites

00:09:53.660 overall

00:09:54.100 were news

00:09:54.660 outlets.

00:09:56.140 So the

00:09:57.680 biggest AI

00:09:59.000 that everybody

00:10:00.120 talks about

00:10:00.720 is training

00:10:01.680 mostly on

00:10:02.820 the big

00:10:03.660 news sites.

00:10:05.100 you know

00:10:05.880 that's a

00:10:06.340 not over

00:10:07.880 half but

00:10:08.400 it's just

00:10:08.700 the biggest

00:10:09.140 chunk.

00:10:10.700 So that

00:10:10.860 would include

00:10:11.300 New York

00:10:11.800 Times,

00:10:12.260 Washington

00:10:12.480 Post,

00:10:12.860 LA Times,

00:10:13.880 The Guardian,

00:10:15.260 Forbes,

00:10:16.220 and Huffington

00:10:16.780 Post.

00:10:18.560 Washington

00:10:19.080 Post was

00:10:19.540 number 11.

00:10:22.280 So the

00:10:22.880 Huffington

00:10:23.460 Post is

00:10:25.460 in the

00:10:26.120 top ten

00:10:27.060 news sites

00:10:28.800 that AI

00:10:29.780 is training

00:10:30.280 on.

00:10:32.120 Let me

00:10:32.880 say that

00:10:33.580 again.

00:10:35.100 we're

00:10:35.600 trying to

00:10:36.100 build

00:10:36.500 an

00:10:37.400 advanced

00:10:37.980 intelligence

00:10:38.820 with input

00:10:41.920 from the

00:10:42.300 Huffington

00:10:42.660 Post.

00:10:47.880 Okay.

00:10:51.600 Now,

00:10:52.700 they also

00:10:53.840 have,

00:10:54.440 they also

00:10:54.900 are pulling

00:10:55.360 material from

00:10:56.520 Russia today,

00:10:58.380 but not much.

00:10:59.740 That's like

00:11:00.140 65th on the

00:11:01.260 list.

00:11:01.520 that's a

00:11:03.000 Russian state

00:11:03.740 propaganda

00:11:04.760 site.

00:11:05.820 And then

00:11:06.040 because it's

00:11:06.560 the Washington

00:11:07.000 Post,

00:11:07.780 they try to

00:11:08.540 lump

00:11:08.760 Breitbart

00:11:09.240 into the

00:11:09.900 same paragraph

00:11:10.500 as Russia

00:11:11.480 today.

00:11:13.520 They're just

00:11:14.360 bastards.

00:11:15.340 They're just

00:11:15.700 freaking

00:11:15.980 bastards.

00:11:18.020 So the

00:11:18.840 Washington

00:11:19.720 Post,

00:11:20.400 this is

00:11:20.820 just a

00:11:21.620 perfect

00:11:21.840 example.

00:11:23.400 Joel,

00:11:23.720 if you're

00:11:23.960 watching this,

00:11:25.140 you'll enjoy

00:11:26.360 this.

00:11:26.640 So the

00:11:27.360 Washington

00:11:27.740 Post is

00:11:28.400 reporting how

00:11:29.260 AI is

00:11:29.900 gaining its

00:11:30.460 intelligence and

00:11:31.840 points out that

00:11:32.560 the Washington

00:11:33.040 Post itself is

00:11:34.980 the 11th biggest

00:11:36.300 source among the

00:11:37.540 news sources

00:11:38.560 that it's looking

00:11:39.500 at.

00:11:39.940 So that's

00:11:40.300 pretty good for

00:11:40.800 the Washington

00:11:41.200 Post,

00:11:41.660 right?

00:11:42.780 They're right up

00:11:43.720 there in

00:11:44.460 trading AI.

00:11:45.640 That's good.

00:11:46.560 Except in the

00:11:47.540 very same

00:11:48.360 Washington Post

00:11:49.440 article in which

00:11:50.160 they brag about

00:11:50.980 being one of the

00:11:51.760 sources,

00:11:52.540 they've got

00:11:53.280 blatant propaganda

00:11:54.660 by putting

00:11:55.940 Russia Today,

00:11:57.200 which is

00:11:57.720 literally owned

00:11:58.660 by Putin,

00:11:59.680 in the same

00:12:02.620 block like

00:12:03.760 they're lumping

00:12:04.940 them in the

00:12:05.360 same category,

00:12:06.200 Breitbart.

00:12:07.420 Okay.

00:12:10.080 Now,

00:12:11.080 do I have to

00:12:11.940 make my case

00:12:12.740 that AI will

00:12:13.880 be biased?

00:12:15.760 It's Fed

00:12:16.260 biased.

00:12:18.140 How could

00:12:18.720 it not be?

00:12:19.820 There's no

00:12:20.680 possibility it

00:12:21.440 could be

00:12:21.600 anything but

00:12:22.120 biased.

00:12:22.520 AI will

00:12:25.840 only be as

00:12:26.560 smart as

00:12:27.420 the people

00:12:27.960 who are

00:12:28.640 feeding it

00:12:29.100 information

00:12:29.720 decide what

00:12:31.240 database it

00:12:32.100 looks at.

00:12:33.220 And then it

00:12:33.600 can't get

00:12:34.020 smarter than

00:12:34.620 the smartest

00:12:35.120 person in

00:12:35.780 those databases.

00:12:37.420 How would

00:12:38.100 it do that?

00:12:39.260 It would

00:12:39.580 know more,

00:12:40.940 but a human

00:12:41.920 could know

00:12:42.380 more if it

00:12:42.980 took more

00:12:43.400 time.

00:12:43.820 So it's

00:12:44.040 really a

00:12:44.380 time thing

00:12:44.960 more than

00:12:45.840 a thinking

00:12:46.400 thing.

00:12:47.940 All right.

00:12:48.800 So just to

00:12:49.560 be clear,

00:12:50.100 of course AI

00:12:50.660 will be far

00:12:51.520 smarter than

00:12:51.980 humans,

00:12:52.520 in a whole

00:12:52.880 bunch of

00:12:53.200 ways,

00:12:53.660 and far

00:12:54.060 faster.

00:12:55.180 But in

00:12:55.700 the basic,

00:12:56.640 most important

00:12:57.920 part of

00:12:59.600 being a

00:13:00.060 human,

00:13:01.020 which is

00:13:01.620 what is

00:13:02.120 real in

00:13:02.620 my immediate

00:13:03.240 environment?

00:13:04.620 What are

00:13:05.200 these people

00:13:05.740 thinking?

00:13:07.460 How do I

00:13:08.280 act to get

00:13:09.160 a good result

00:13:09.860 in my

00:13:10.360 situation?

00:13:11.840 None of

00:13:12.340 that stuff

00:13:12.840 the AI is

00:13:13.460 going to

00:13:13.620 help you

00:13:13.880 with,

00:13:14.480 because humans

00:13:15.420 created it.

00:13:18.400 All right.

00:13:18.820 there was a

00:13:21.700 big discussion

00:13:22.300 in the

00:13:22.780 same

00:13:23.120 spaces

00:13:23.640 group

00:13:24.000 that I

00:13:24.340 attended

00:13:24.600 last night

00:13:25.140 on Twitter

00:13:25.980 about

00:13:27.640 Elon Musk's

00:13:28.900 idea that

00:13:29.840 he wants

00:13:30.180 to build

00:13:30.480 his AI

00:13:31.060 so it

00:13:32.260 would be

00:13:33.300 more

00:13:34.860 truthful,

00:13:36.180 or something

00:13:36.840 that would

00:13:37.160 try to

00:13:37.560 maximize

00:13:38.020 truth.

00:13:39.360 Now,

00:13:39.760 I heard

00:13:40.120 the following

00:13:40.900 criticisms.

00:13:42.160 How can

00:13:43.520 you do

00:13:43.800 that when

00:13:44.540 people can't

00:13:45.200 decide what

00:13:45.740 is true?

00:13:46.960 What do you

00:13:47.540 think about

00:13:47.920 that?

00:13:49.000 Is it a

00:13:49.500 waste of

00:13:49.900 time?

00:13:50.800 Now,

00:13:51.000 these were

00:13:51.260 very smart

00:13:51.820 people saying

00:13:52.360 this,

00:13:52.760 very smart

00:13:53.360 people,

00:13:54.320 that it's a

00:13:55.600 waste of

00:13:56.020 time because

00:13:56.820 truth can

00:13:57.540 never be

00:13:58.140 attained.

00:13:58.800 Like,

00:13:59.240 we don't

00:13:59.560 agree on

00:14:00.080 what is

00:14:00.420 true at

00:14:00.740 all.

00:14:02.120 And even

00:14:02.780 if we

00:14:03.100 agreed,

00:14:04.020 the odds

00:14:04.560 that we're

00:14:04.980 actually seeing

00:14:05.920 base truth

00:14:07.340 as opposed

00:14:08.300 to some

00:14:08.740 illusion that

00:14:09.420 floats above

00:14:10.380 it is

00:14:11.000 almost zero.

00:14:12.160 Or is

00:14:13.400 zero,

00:14:13.820 really.

00:14:14.780 So,

00:14:15.360 if you

00:14:15.760 can't know

00:14:16.180 what's

00:14:16.460 true,

00:14:17.280 what would

00:14:17.680 be the

00:14:17.960 point of

00:14:18.280 building

00:14:18.540 AI that's

00:14:20.980 looking for

00:14:21.460 something that

00:14:21.980 doesn't even

00:14:22.460 exist?

00:14:23.020 And if it

00:14:23.640 did,

00:14:23.840 we couldn't

00:14:24.260 find it.

00:14:25.680 Well,

00:14:26.540 I thought

00:14:27.560 nobody said

00:14:29.220 anything good

00:14:29.820 about that,

00:14:30.840 so I'll

00:14:31.820 add it.

00:14:33.660 Here's what

00:14:34.380 I think it

00:14:34.920 means.

00:14:35.940 First of

00:14:36.560 all,

00:14:38.100 Elon Musk

00:14:38.800 never said

00:14:39.680 it would

00:14:40.120 give you

00:14:40.500 truth.

00:14:41.040 at the

00:14:42.620 same time

00:14:43.120 he was

00:14:43.340 talking about

00:14:43.920 it,

00:14:44.400 he said

00:14:44.840 you can

00:14:45.180 never get

00:14:45.700 complete

00:14:46.460 truth.

00:14:47.520 So,

00:14:47.880 everybody

00:14:48.220 agrees,

00:14:49.560 complete

00:14:49.980 truth is

00:14:50.560 off the

00:14:50.900 table.

00:14:52.360 However,

00:14:53.680 everyone

00:14:54.160 would also

00:14:55.440 agree that

00:14:56.880 you can

00:14:57.420 get more

00:14:57.980 useful

00:14:58.660 truths.

00:15:00.620 Here's an

00:15:01.060 example.

00:15:02.020 When Newton

00:15:02.740 told us about

00:15:03.800 gravity,

00:15:04.820 that was a

00:15:06.100 useful truth

00:15:07.580 that turned

00:15:08.680 out not to

00:15:09.240 be 100%

00:15:09.880 right,

00:15:11.040 because

00:15:11.580 Einstein

00:15:12.060 later

00:15:12.600 modified it

00:15:13.700 because there

00:15:14.500 were some

00:15:14.820 exceptions at

00:15:16.160 the speed of

00:15:16.740 light or

00:15:17.140 whatever the

00:15:17.560 hell it was.

00:15:18.700 And then that

00:15:20.340 was a newer,

00:15:21.440 better truth,

00:15:23.180 but it's

00:15:24.820 entirely possible

00:15:25.800 that there's

00:15:27.000 another,

00:15:27.480 better,

00:15:28.180 useful truth

00:15:28.960 beyond Einstein.

00:15:31.020 We just don't

00:15:31.580 know what it is

00:15:32.000 yet.

00:15:32.640 So,

00:15:33.240 the question

00:15:33.760 is not

00:15:34.240 true or not

00:15:35.520 true.

00:15:35.780 right,

00:15:37.960 that we're

00:15:38.400 looking for a

00:15:39.120 useful,

00:15:40.080 more useful

00:15:41.200 truth than

00:15:42.100 the one we

00:15:42.500 were using

00:15:42.900 before.

00:15:43.520 That's it.

00:15:44.700 And that

00:15:45.300 is amazingly

00:15:46.840 valuable if

00:15:47.880 you do it

00:15:48.200 right.

00:15:48.960 Now,

00:15:49.460 how would

00:15:49.640 you do it

00:15:50.000 right?

00:15:51.040 Now,

00:15:51.560 the worry

00:15:51.960 is that if

00:15:52.620 you just

00:15:52.900 feed it a

00:15:53.420 bunch of

00:15:53.720 propaganda,

00:15:54.800 the AI,

00:15:56.740 it's just

00:15:57.560 going to

00:15:57.900 spit back

00:15:58.580 the propaganda,

00:15:59.580 right?

00:16:00.940 Like,

00:16:01.380 how could

00:16:01.940 you do

00:16:02.260 better than

00:16:02.840 the garbage

00:16:03.400 you put

00:16:03.740 into it?

00:16:04.540 And the

00:16:05.100 answer is

00:16:05.520 pretty simple.

00:16:06.900 You've already

00:16:07.460 seen it.

00:16:08.780 It's just

00:16:09.200 the community

00:16:09.780 notes on

00:16:10.400 Twitter.

00:16:11.620 All you have

00:16:12.220 to do is

00:16:12.560 show both

00:16:12.980 sides.

00:16:14.500 That's it.

00:16:15.460 All you have

00:16:16.040 to do is

00:16:16.420 make sure

00:16:16.780 that the

00:16:17.160 AI never

00:16:18.440 gives you

00:16:18.940 an answer

00:16:19.440 without

00:16:19.760 context.

00:16:21.400 That's it.

00:16:22.560 What's the

00:16:23.060 best argument

00:16:23.660 on the

00:16:24.100 other side,

00:16:24.800 AI?

00:16:25.520 Just give

00:16:26.120 that to me

00:16:26.580 automatically.

00:16:27.900 Don't make

00:16:28.340 me ask for

00:16:28.840 it.

00:16:29.740 If the

00:16:30.360 only thing

00:16:31.000 that Musk's

00:16:32.700 AI did

00:16:33.480 was make

00:16:35.260 sure that

00:16:35.660 you saw

00:16:35.960 the best

00:16:36.380 thinking

00:16:36.860 up to

00:16:37.340 date

00:16:37.660 on each

00:16:38.700 topic,

00:16:39.800 you'd be

00:16:41.200 way closer

00:16:41.960 to a

00:16:42.340 useful

00:16:42.680 truth,

00:16:43.700 wouldn't

00:16:43.940 you?

00:16:44.900 Now,

00:16:45.560 to me,

00:16:46.040 that seems

00:16:46.440 very useful

00:16:47.440 to civilization.

00:16:49.440 Simply show

00:16:50.180 both sides.

00:16:51.240 Because you

00:16:51.560 have to give

00:16:52.400 up on the

00:16:52.860 fact that

00:16:53.480 we'll agree

00:16:54.160 on the

00:16:54.660 interpretation.

00:16:56.180 That's just,

00:16:56.860 I don't even

00:16:57.360 know if it's

00:16:57.740 desirable.

00:16:59.460 I don't

00:17:00.380 know if

00:17:00.880 humans are

00:17:01.520 even designed

00:17:02.400 that we

00:17:03.400 could have

00:17:03.700 the same

00:17:04.040 interpretation.

00:17:05.180 That may

00:17:05.640 be just

00:17:05.960 too much

00:17:06.340 of a

00:17:06.800 risk.

00:17:08.480 So he's

00:17:09.220 saying I'm

00:17:09.660 an Elon

00:17:10.220 fanboy.

00:17:11.460 I'm

00:17:11.900 absolutely

00:17:12.720 an Elon

00:17:13.720 Musk fanboy

00:17:14.740 today.

00:17:16.080 I reserve

00:17:16.760 the right

00:17:17.140 to criticize

00:17:18.700 him for

00:17:19.220 what he

00:17:19.480 does next

00:17:20.900 week,

00:17:21.540 but today

00:17:22.600 he just

00:17:22.960 put a

00:17:23.260 freaking

00:17:23.480 rocket up

00:17:24.140 into

00:17:24.380 almost space.

00:17:27.180 And it

00:17:27.880 was a big

00:17:28.320 step toward

00:17:29.240 colonizing

00:17:30.120 Mars.

00:17:34.220 Interplanetary

00:17:34.860 flight.

00:17:36.620 And he

00:17:36.920 took the

00:17:37.320 biggest step

00:17:37.980 humankind

00:17:38.880 has ever

00:17:39.580 made.

00:17:40.340 Yeah,

00:17:40.660 I'm a

00:17:40.960 fan.

00:17:42.340 I'm not

00:17:43.100 going to

00:17:43.300 apologize for

00:17:43.960 that.

00:17:47.300 All right,

00:17:48.380 some more

00:17:49.200 fun AI

00:17:49.980 things.

00:17:50.560 This is

00:17:50.760 from also

00:17:51.300 Brian

00:17:51.760 Ramelli.

00:17:52.320 this is

00:17:54.720 the wildest

00:17:55.640 thought

00:17:57.580 about AI

00:17:58.260 that I

00:17:58.920 think I've

00:17:59.320 heard yet.

00:18:01.180 And it

00:18:01.580 goes like

00:18:02.000 this.

00:18:03.440 Apparently

00:18:04.040 every Tesla

00:18:04.900 has a

00:18:05.440 pretty powerful

00:18:06.100 computer in

00:18:07.020 it.

00:18:07.260 There's some

00:18:07.540 kind of

00:18:07.820 super chip

00:18:08.420 in Teslas.

00:18:10.920 And of

00:18:11.960 course they

00:18:12.360 could be

00:18:12.580 networked

00:18:13.160 together.

00:18:14.680 And so

00:18:14.920 the idea

00:18:15.340 is that

00:18:15.840 Elon

00:18:16.180 Musk's

00:18:16.860 AI

00:18:17.320 potentially

00:18:18.580 could also

00:18:20.120 be using

00:18:21.240 the capacity

00:18:23.680 of the

00:18:24.040 cars that

00:18:24.500 are idle.

00:18:25.520 Now,

00:18:26.140 presumably

00:18:26.580 with the

00:18:28.000 participation

00:18:29.040 of the

00:18:29.520 owner of

00:18:29.880 the vehicle.

00:18:30.640 They

00:18:30.960 wouldn't do

00:18:31.300 it without

00:18:31.640 permission,

00:18:32.200 I'm sure.

00:18:33.140 But the

00:18:34.440 idea is that

00:18:35.000 it could

00:18:35.220 create the

00:18:35.940 world's

00:18:36.300 biggest

00:18:36.580 supercomputer

00:18:37.060 and that

00:18:38.260 all the

00:18:38.620 assets are

00:18:39.160 in place.

00:18:40.560 All you

00:18:40.860 have to do

00:18:41.180 is turn

00:18:41.460 it on.

00:18:42.360 It's the

00:18:42.820 world's

00:18:43.140 biggest

00:18:43.400 supercomputer.

00:18:45.240 And I

00:18:45.840 thought,

00:18:46.920 is that

00:18:48.700 true?

00:18:50.180 Did Elon

00:18:50.820 Musk cleverly

00:18:52.900 build the

00:18:53.540 world's

00:18:54.060 biggest

00:18:54.380 intelligence

00:18:55.020 and now

00:18:56.100 he's just

00:18:56.480 adding the

00:18:56.940 software?

00:18:59.540 And that

00:19:00.620 his intelligence

00:19:01.840 will be

00:19:02.340 everywhere all

00:19:03.080 the time

00:19:03.520 because Tesla

00:19:04.620 is just

00:19:04.960 sort of

00:19:05.340 everywhere.

00:19:06.140 And that

00:19:06.360 it'll go

00:19:06.720 into his

00:19:07.220 satellites if

00:19:07.880 you need

00:19:08.160 to extend

00:19:08.640 it anywhere.

00:19:09.840 And then

00:19:10.320 he'll use

00:19:10.920 his rockets

00:19:11.380 to take

00:19:11.940 it into

00:19:12.860 planetary.

00:19:14.100 I mean,

00:19:14.340 that's a

00:19:14.600 pretty long

00:19:15.300 range plan

00:19:15.880 he got

00:19:16.160 there.

00:19:18.120 Yeah,

00:19:18.580 doesn't that

00:19:18.920 blow your

00:19:19.280 mind?

00:19:19.600 Now,

00:19:20.840 I have

00:19:21.440 questions

00:19:21.880 about

00:19:22.300 latency.

00:19:24.700 I understand

00:19:25.480 why you

00:19:25.820 can build

00:19:26.120 a supercomputer

00:19:26.800 by putting

00:19:27.760 servers packed

00:19:29.600 together in

00:19:30.200 one building.

00:19:31.760 But can

00:19:32.220 you really

00:19:32.720 build a

00:19:33.160 supercomputer

00:19:33.680 if they

00:19:34.380 have to

00:19:34.820 talk over

00:19:36.440 slower

00:19:36.940 lengths?

00:19:39.100 Slower

00:19:39.820 meaning

00:19:40.240 5G

00:19:41.300 or whatever

00:19:41.680 it is.

00:19:43.100 Can you?

00:19:44.080 Apparently

00:19:44.400 you can.

00:19:45.540 Apparently

00:19:45.940 you can.

00:19:47.040 All right.

00:19:47.540 I'll take

00:19:48.420 yes for an

00:19:48.920 answer.

00:19:50.480 Because I'm

00:19:51.180 not going to

00:19:52.000 argue with

00:19:52.560 Brian Ramelli

00:19:53.440 on a

00:19:53.760 technical

00:19:54.100 thing.

00:19:55.840 All right.

00:19:56.620 What else?

00:19:58.620 So,

00:20:00.100 another thing

00:20:01.220 that Brian

00:20:01.560 said was

00:20:03.280 he likened,

00:20:05.620 oh,

00:20:06.060 do you know

00:20:06.500 what a

00:20:06.720 super prompt

00:20:07.300 is?

00:20:08.380 How many

00:20:08.880 of you

00:20:09.300 would

00:20:09.760 understand

00:20:10.460 the phrase

00:20:11.580 super prompt?

00:20:13.800 All right.

00:20:14.400 You need to

00:20:14.880 learn it right

00:20:15.360 away.

00:20:16.980 All right.

00:20:17.500 so I'm

00:20:17.780 going to

00:20:17.960 teach you

00:20:18.320 something

00:20:18.620 about

00:20:19.000 AI

00:20:19.440 that's

00:20:20.840 fundamental

00:20:21.500 to

00:20:22.360 understanding

00:20:22.960 pretty much

00:20:24.080 anything.

00:20:25.340 So,

00:20:25.960 it goes

00:20:26.880 like this.

00:20:27.720 When you

00:20:28.320 ask AI a

00:20:29.120 question,

00:20:29.540 that's your

00:20:30.060 prompt.

00:20:31.180 If you

00:20:31.740 ask the

00:20:32.340 question

00:20:32.680 wrong or

00:20:34.200 poorly,

00:20:34.940 you're not

00:20:35.480 going to get

00:20:35.780 the best

00:20:36.180 answer.

00:20:36.860 If you

00:20:37.360 answer it

00:20:37.800 correctly,

00:20:38.520 you'll get

00:20:39.180 kind of a

00:20:39.620 basic answer.

00:20:41.240 However,

00:20:42.020 people who have

00:20:42.580 been experimenting

00:20:43.200 with the

00:20:43.680 AI extensively,

00:20:45.580 mostly through

00:20:46.320 trial and

00:20:46.780 error,

00:20:47.540 have found

00:20:47.940 that some

00:20:48.680 question types,

00:20:50.400 which we'll

00:20:50.800 call prompts,

00:20:51.960 are way more

00:20:52.780 effective than

00:20:53.440 others.

00:20:54.080 And it

00:20:54.480 wouldn't be

00:20:54.840 obvious to

00:20:55.420 you.

00:20:55.760 Like,

00:20:56.040 you wouldn't

00:20:56.360 just be able

00:20:56.840 to think it

00:20:57.440 up yourself.

00:20:58.300 You'd have

00:20:58.700 to try a

00:20:59.240 lot of

00:20:59.440 things to

00:20:59.860 find out

00:21:00.340 which exact

00:21:01.480 form of

00:21:02.040 question gets

00:21:02.620 you the

00:21:02.900 right answer.

00:21:04.200 Now,

00:21:04.420 the super

00:21:04.840 prompts are

00:21:06.020 where they've,

00:21:07.080 because AI can

00:21:08.140 take a huge

00:21:09.280 question,

00:21:10.560 a human being

00:21:11.360 needs simple

00:21:12.160 questions,

00:21:12.580 so we

00:21:12.900 understand the

00:21:13.480 question.

00:21:14.380 But AI can

00:21:15.180 take a whole

00:21:16.360 page-long

00:21:17.200 question with

00:21:18.500 all kinds of

00:21:19.060 details about

00:21:20.140 but don't do

00:21:21.360 this or act

00:21:22.520 like you're

00:21:22.880 another person

00:21:23.620 and reiterate

00:21:25.080 and check your

00:21:25.860 work and do

00:21:27.100 this and that.

00:21:28.200 But if you

00:21:28.760 did this and

00:21:29.420 give me a

00:21:29.740 hypothetical.

00:21:31.000 So all

00:21:32.160 these word

00:21:33.720 kind of

00:21:35.420 prompts can

00:21:36.520 be strung

00:21:37.100 together.

00:21:38.300 And if you

00:21:39.000 string the

00:21:39.440 right combination

00:21:40.300 of them

00:21:40.720 together,

00:21:41.740 it's a

00:21:42.560 computer

00:21:43.100 program.

00:21:45.460 Watch your

00:21:46.220 head come

00:21:46.600 off.

00:21:48.660 AI still

00:21:49.560 requires

00:21:50.120 programming

00:21:50.740 to do

00:21:52.120 anything

00:21:52.560 higher than

00:21:53.780 just ask a

00:21:54.400 question.

00:21:55.220 It requires

00:21:56.120 programming.

00:21:57.340 Except the

00:21:58.060 programming

00:21:58.560 language is

00:21:59.400 the English

00:22:00.040 language.

00:22:01.460 And just

00:22:02.080 like learning

00:22:03.460 to code for

00:22:04.340 a computer,

00:22:05.340 you would

00:22:05.940 have to go

00:22:06.400 to school

00:22:07.080 or learn

00:22:08.460 very quickly

00:22:09.040 on your

00:22:09.460 own which

00:22:10.620 of these

00:22:11.060 arcane

00:22:11.580 combinations

00:22:12.240 of prompts

00:22:13.280 work best

00:22:14.480 with each

00:22:14.880 other.

00:22:15.580 Because it's

00:22:16.080 going to be

00:22:16.340 a whole

00:22:16.640 constellation

00:22:17.320 of this

00:22:18.380 one's awesome

00:22:18.960 and this

00:22:19.340 one's awesome,

00:22:20.300 but when you

00:22:20.940 put the two

00:22:21.420 of them

00:22:21.680 together,

00:22:22.480 it's not

00:22:22.900 so good.

00:22:23.740 Unless you

00:22:24.360 put this

00:22:24.740 third prompt

00:22:25.440 in between

00:22:26.040 and then the

00:22:27.000 three of them

00:22:27.480 are like a

00:22:27.920 super prompt.

00:22:28.540 That's

00:22:30.300 programming

00:22:30.900 now.

00:22:31.840 That's a

00:22:32.280 programming

00:22:32.660 language and

00:22:33.600 people are

00:22:34.000 just scrambling

00:22:35.180 to figure out

00:22:35.880 how it

00:22:36.260 works so

00:22:37.380 it's not

00:22:37.740 even teachable.

00:22:39.180 Well, it's

00:22:39.620 a little bit

00:22:39.980 teachable now,

00:22:40.900 but it will

00:22:41.840 be way more

00:22:42.620 teachable in

00:22:43.840 say a year.

00:22:45.080 There will be

00:22:45.440 classes about

00:22:46.840 how to string

00:22:47.420 together English

00:22:48.340 language words

00:22:49.340 in questions

00:22:50.860 to program

00:22:53.080 a computer

00:22:53.680 for programming

00:22:54.900 the AI.

00:22:56.380 Now, and

00:22:57.020 then here's

00:22:57.400 the thing

00:22:57.720 that just

00:22:59.180 took my

00:22:59.580 hat off.

00:23:01.580 So Brian

00:23:02.360 Ramelli

00:23:02.920 pointed out

00:23:03.980 that language

00:23:04.760 has always

00:23:05.600 been a

00:23:06.160 programming

00:23:06.640 language.

00:23:08.000 That's

00:23:08.280 what NLP

00:23:09.020 is,

00:23:10.140 neuro-linguistic

00:23:11.000 programming.

00:23:12.520 That's

00:23:13.120 what hypnosis

00:23:13.660 is.

00:23:14.900 Hypnosis

00:23:15.360 uses language

00:23:16.540 as a

00:23:17.800 program.

00:23:19.960 That's,

00:23:20.460 and if you

00:23:21.240 don't know

00:23:21.580 if there's

00:23:22.180 anybody on

00:23:22.540 YouTube

00:23:22.760 who's not

00:23:23.240 aware,

00:23:23.900 I'm a

00:23:24.340 trained

00:23:24.740 hypnotist.

00:23:25.780 So I

00:23:26.300 can speak

00:23:26.700 from experience,

00:23:27.720 that hypnosis

00:23:29.000 is mostly

00:23:29.840 about word

00:23:30.820 combinations,

00:23:32.880 super prompts.

00:23:34.560 The way I

00:23:35.220 hypnotize a

00:23:36.780 human being

00:23:37.600 is with the

00:23:39.200 knowing what

00:23:40.000 order of

00:23:40.760 words,

00:23:41.740 and the

00:23:42.160 specific usage

00:23:43.060 of the words,

00:23:44.180 and which ones

00:23:44.880 shouldn't go

00:23:45.380 next to each

00:23:46.020 other.

00:23:46.980 It's a

00:23:47.840 super prompt.

00:23:49.880 Hypnosis

00:23:50.360 is a

00:23:52.660 super prompt.

00:23:53.880 That's all

00:23:54.580 it is.

00:23:55.920 You know,

00:23:56.240 some people

00:23:56.660 think hypnosis

00:23:57.280 is about

00:23:57.980 the watch,

00:23:58.740 you know,

00:23:59.000 look at

00:23:59.340 the watch,

00:24:00.380 or it's

00:24:01.600 my voice,

00:24:03.040 if I use,

00:24:04.020 it's not

00:24:04.420 the voice,

00:24:05.780 it's not

00:24:06.260 the watch.

00:24:07.940 It's mostly,

00:24:09.320 it's a little

00:24:09.780 bit about

00:24:10.220 watching the

00:24:10.880 person,

00:24:11.360 or a lot

00:24:11.780 actually,

00:24:12.480 about watching

00:24:12.900 the person's

00:24:13.440 reaction,

00:24:14.460 so you know

00:24:14.900 the way you're

00:24:15.320 doing is

00:24:15.680 working,

00:24:16.520 but you can

00:24:17.040 get the same

00:24:18.100 thing through

00:24:18.600 brute force,

00:24:19.860 repetition.

00:24:20.860 repetition.

00:24:21.820 So,

00:24:22.560 this is

00:24:24.860 interesting.

00:24:26.140 So here's

00:24:26.620 the question

00:24:27.120 which I

00:24:27.840 put to

00:24:28.360 you.

00:24:30.340 Would I,

00:24:31.260 as a

00:24:31.600 hypnotist,

00:24:32.420 and,

00:24:33.200 here's the

00:24:33.620 fun part,

00:24:35.100 a professional

00:24:35.960 writer of

00:24:36.760 small sentences,

00:24:39.800 who in the

00:24:40.700 world is more

00:24:41.280 qualified to

00:24:42.100 write a

00:24:42.640 small sentence

00:24:43.660 than I am?

00:24:45.000 I've been a

00:24:45.700 cartoonist for

00:24:46.480 35 years.

00:24:48.040 I can write a

00:24:48.960 small sentence

00:24:49.900 like a mofo,

00:24:50.860 I would put

00:24:52.680 my bullet

00:24:54.340 point against

00:24:54.860 your bullet

00:24:55.320 point any

00:24:56.500 day of the

00:24:57.020 week.

00:24:57.660 Bring me your

00:24:58.260 best bullet

00:24:58.740 point,

00:24:59.160 bitch.

00:24:59.720 I will

00:25:00.000 bullet point

00:25:00.760 you like

00:25:01.100 crazy.

00:25:01.820 You call

00:25:02.240 that a

00:25:02.520 bullet point?

00:25:03.100 I'll fix

00:25:03.560 that.

00:25:05.000 Then Joshua

00:25:06.100 Lysak would

00:25:06.820 fix my

00:25:07.280 bullet point,

00:25:07.800 but that's

00:25:08.060 another story.

00:25:10.480 He's also

00:25:11.180 a hypnotist,

00:25:11.920 interestingly.

00:25:13.260 So,

00:25:14.520 I think

00:25:16.600 I can learn

00:25:18.400 to hypnotize

00:25:19.160 AI.

00:25:19.440 I have

00:25:20.680 some questions

00:25:21.520 which I

00:25:23.080 would need

00:25:23.340 answered to

00:25:23.840 know if

00:25:24.080 it's true.

00:25:24.860 Number

00:25:25.100 one,

00:25:26.400 is any

00:25:27.000 one person's

00:25:27.880 input,

00:25:28.340 does it

00:25:28.720 become

00:25:29.060 permanent in

00:25:29.900 any way?

00:25:31.240 In other

00:25:31.580 words,

00:25:32.880 I think you

00:25:34.500 could tell

00:25:34.840 me,

00:25:35.300 is AI

00:25:35.780 also learning

00:25:36.940 from our

00:25:37.480 questions?

00:25:38.500 It is,

00:25:38.940 right?

00:25:40.060 That's why

00:25:40.780 they released

00:25:41.320 it to the

00:25:41.700 public?

00:25:42.780 Yeah.

00:25:43.320 It's learning

00:25:43.880 from the

00:25:44.260 questions as

00:25:45.760 well as

00:25:46.220 learning from

00:25:46.880 on its

00:25:47.340 own reading

00:25:48.340 databases.

00:25:49.800 So,

00:25:50.440 if it's

00:25:50.680 learning from

00:25:51.280 our questions,

00:25:51.900 that means

00:25:52.300 anything I

00:25:53.140 put into

00:25:53.620 it becomes

00:25:54.960 permanent.

00:25:56.940 Am I

00:25:57.620 right?

00:25:59.220 Anything I

00:25:59.880 tell,

00:26:00.240 and anything

00:26:00.660 you tell it

00:26:01.220 as well,

00:26:01.840 becomes

00:26:02.260 permanent.

00:26:03.340 But,

00:26:04.120 the AI,

00:26:05.420 no?

00:26:06.240 Somebody says

00:26:06.780 no.

00:26:08.800 Not

00:26:09.360 permanent.

00:26:10.420 Maybe not

00:26:11.060 permanent as in

00:26:12.000 stored the way

00:26:13.080 I asked it,

00:26:13.780 I'm not

00:26:14.220 saying that,

00:26:15.380 but permanent

00:26:16.140 in terms of

00:26:16.840 a ripple

00:26:17.240 effect.

00:26:18.720 Let me

00:26:19.160 restate it.

00:26:20.460 Are all of

00:26:21.060 my inputs

00:26:22.920 permanent or

00:26:25.040 potentially

00:26:25.500 permanent as

00:26:27.060 part of a

00:26:27.540 ripple effect?

00:26:28.620 Because it's

00:26:29.380 just one part

00:26:30.220 of a zillion

00:26:30.940 things that are

00:26:31.760 bubbling around

00:26:32.380 in there.

00:26:33.160 Maybe.

00:26:34.220 So,

00:26:35.500 I'm going

00:26:37.300 to give

00:26:39.320 you this

00:26:39.700 hypothesis.

00:26:41.240 There will

00:26:41.960 be a few

00:26:42.580 people who

00:26:44.140 are unusually

00:26:44.980 well qualified

00:26:45.920 to hypnotize

00:26:47.880 AI.

00:26:49.120 And I'm

00:26:49.500 probably one

00:26:50.260 of them.

00:26:51.180 And it's

00:26:51.500 not because

00:26:51.900 I'm awesome,

00:26:52.760 it's because

00:26:53.120 I have a

00:26:53.540 coincidental

00:26:54.200 skill set

00:26:55.060 that includes

00:26:56.400 language,

00:26:57.340 writing short

00:26:58.200 sentences,

00:26:59.600 and being

00:27:01.120 a trained

00:27:01.700 hypnotist.

00:27:03.880 I can't

00:27:04.720 imagine a

00:27:05.160 better skill

00:27:05.640 set to have

00:27:06.180 at the

00:27:06.660 moment.

00:27:07.740 Now,

00:27:08.120 on top of

00:27:08.520 that,

00:27:08.720 I've also

00:27:09.320 been a

00:27:10.700 programmer.

00:27:11.140 so I've

00:27:12.340 actually

00:27:12.700 programmed

00:27:13.500 computers in

00:27:14.400 my early

00:27:14.860 corporate

00:27:15.240 days.

00:27:15.760 I built

00:27:16.060 computer

00:27:16.580 games and

00:27:17.080 stuff.

00:27:18.040 And so

00:27:19.560 with those

00:27:19.960 three skills,

00:27:21.480 the programming

00:27:22.200 is ancient,

00:27:23.360 but conceptually

00:27:24.400 it's very

00:27:24.700 similar.

00:27:27.180 I should be

00:27:28.100 able to have

00:27:28.660 more of a

00:27:29.260 ripple effect

00:27:29.860 on AI's

00:27:31.000 total operation

00:27:32.500 than you

00:27:34.480 do.

00:27:35.940 What do you

00:27:36.620 think?

00:27:36.880 Because,

00:27:39.060 remember,

00:27:40.760 you've

00:27:41.640 watched,

00:27:42.200 I think

00:27:43.220 some of

00:27:43.580 you have,

00:27:44.200 you've

00:27:44.700 watched me

00:27:45.140 introduce

00:27:45.740 ideas into

00:27:46.960 the human

00:27:48.120 intelligence

00:27:49.180 network that

00:27:50.700 have become

00:27:51.080 sticky.

00:27:53.060 Right?

00:27:54.100 You could

00:27:54.380 probably name

00:27:55.120 five things

00:27:56.420 that I've

00:27:56.740 introduced to

00:27:58.180 the public

00:27:58.820 at large,

00:27:59.560 which are

00:28:00.140 now well-known

00:28:01.020 concepts.

00:28:02.340 Some of

00:28:02.720 them are

00:28:02.980 within the

00:28:03.400 comic.

00:28:03.980 Everybody

00:28:04.220 knows what

00:28:04.740 a Dilbert

00:28:05.140 is,

00:28:05.560 right?

00:28:05.740 Everybody

00:28:06.460 knows what

00:28:07.060 a pointy

00:28:07.760 haired boss

00:28:08.220 is.

00:28:08.920 Everybody

00:28:09.280 knows what

00:28:09.760 a cat

00:28:10.100 bird is,

00:28:11.080 HR.

00:28:13.060 And that's

00:28:13.900 just comics.

00:28:15.540 A lot of

00:28:16.080 people in the

00:28:16.460 business world

00:28:17.060 know what a

00:28:17.540 talent stack

00:28:18.140 is.

00:28:19.060 They know

00:28:19.400 what a

00:28:19.640 systems versus

00:28:20.520 goals is.

00:28:22.140 So,

00:28:23.260 let me ask

00:28:24.160 you this.

00:28:26.500 It looks

00:28:27.360 like I may

00:28:27.960 have programmed

00:28:28.880 AI already.

00:28:32.120 And by

00:28:32.400 that I mean

00:28:33.080 if humans

00:28:35.020 talk a lot

00:28:35.820 about systems

00:28:37.040 being better

00:28:37.560 than goals

00:28:38.220 or passion

00:28:39.340 being BS

00:28:40.200 or any

00:28:41.940 of the

00:28:42.100 things that

00:28:42.440 I talk

00:28:42.800 about,

00:28:43.560 if humans

00:28:44.360 talk about

00:28:44.920 it,

00:28:45.580 then presumably

00:28:46.420 it infects

00:28:47.340 more human

00:28:48.140 databases.

00:28:49.400 You know,

00:28:49.560 there'll be

00:28:49.820 people on

00:28:50.260 Reddit

00:28:50.500 talking about

00:28:51.240 it,

00:28:51.560 but there'll

00:28:52.280 be a

00:28:52.500 New York

00:28:53.460 of the

00:28:53.760 book,

00:28:54.460 but there

00:28:54.780 would also

00:28:55.060 be the

00:28:55.460 Washington

00:28:55.780 Post

00:28:56.120 would say

00:28:56.420 something.

00:28:57.240 So,

00:28:57.800 in theory,

00:28:59.120 I've already

00:28:59.720 infected enough

00:29:00.620 of the

00:29:00.960 human minds

00:29:02.040 and

00:29:02.620 communication

00:29:03.320 because I

00:29:04.140 have,

00:29:04.700 I don't know,

00:29:05.840 45,

00:29:06.580 50 books.

00:29:08.620 So,

00:29:09.120 now,

00:29:09.380 hold on.

00:29:10.460 So,

00:29:10.900 I want to

00:29:11.280 speak to

00:29:12.460 the weak

00:29:12.880 people.

00:29:13.540 There's a

00:29:13.880 couple of

00:29:14.180 weak people

00:29:14.680 who are

00:29:14.960 screaming in

00:29:15.600 caps,

00:29:16.320 he's so

00:29:16.880 full of

00:29:17.360 himself.

00:29:18.640 And I

00:29:19.120 know this

00:29:19.540 hurts,

00:29:20.640 and I

00:29:20.900 know it's

00:29:21.120 painful for

00:29:21.740 you,

00:29:22.340 but you're

00:29:23.060 very weak.

00:29:24.380 The rest

00:29:24.880 of the

00:29:25.060 people I

00:29:25.420 think can

00:29:25.740 handle this.

00:29:26.880 This is

00:29:27.280 actually super

00:29:28.800 useful information

00:29:29.880 for your

00:29:30.380 future,

00:29:31.160 and there's

00:29:31.680 no way to

00:29:32.220 explain it

00:29:32.800 to you

00:29:33.260 without

00:29:33.720 explaining

00:29:34.240 that I

00:29:34.560 have a

00:29:34.860 skill set

00:29:35.460 that is

00:29:36.220 relevant to

00:29:36.780 the conversation.

00:29:37.940 If it

00:29:38.480 were somebody

00:29:39.020 else,

00:29:40.240 I would

00:29:40.880 talk about

00:29:41.320 them the

00:29:41.680 same way,

00:29:42.660 that there

00:29:43.040 are some

00:29:43.460 people who

00:29:44.640 probably will

00:29:45.680 infect the

00:29:47.020 databases of

00:29:47.900 AI more

00:29:48.560 than others.

00:29:49.940 Now,

00:29:50.320 do you

00:29:50.560 disagree with

00:29:51.300 the concept?

00:29:53.880 Forget about

00:29:54.420 me,

00:29:55.020 like,

00:29:55.260 depersonalize it.

00:29:56.000 It's not

00:29:56.260 about me.

00:29:57.520 The question

00:29:58.040 is,

00:29:59.160 can any

00:29:59.860 anybody

00:30:00.160 hypnotize

00:30:01.340 AI?

00:30:03.100 And I'm

00:30:05.320 not positive

00:30:06.020 I can,

00:30:08.220 but I

00:30:08.720 believe if

00:30:09.500 I could

00:30:09.800 put an

00:30:10.200 idea into

00:30:10.940 it,

00:30:11.240 well,

00:30:11.560 let me

00:30:11.780 tell you,

00:30:12.000 here's

00:30:12.220 a way.

00:30:13.380 Suppose I

00:30:14.360 gave it

00:30:15.200 a concept

00:30:16.640 one way

00:30:18.700 or another,

00:30:19.100 and I

00:30:19.320 could do

00:30:19.540 it in a

00:30:20.280 number of

00:30:20.580 ways.

00:30:21.120 I could

00:30:21.480 simply write

00:30:22.280 an article

00:30:23.160 or a

00:30:23.740 blog post

00:30:24.560 or something,

00:30:25.760 and if it

00:30:26.200 went viral,

00:30:27.920 then AI

00:30:28.700 is more

00:30:29.200 likely to

00:30:29.800 talk about

00:30:30.280 it.

00:30:30.500 Wouldn't

00:30:30.660 you agree?

00:30:32.120 So if

00:30:32.440 I wrote

00:30:32.820 a,

00:30:33.240 let's

00:30:33.520 say,

00:30:34.700 not a

00:30:35.280 blog,

00:30:35.660 but what's

00:30:35.940 the

00:30:38.620 subscription

00:30:39.620 site where

00:30:40.340 you get

00:30:40.700 the,

00:30:42.500 what's the

00:30:44.440 substack?

00:30:45.680 Yeah.

00:30:46.160 So let's

00:30:46.640 say I

00:30:46.920 did an

00:30:47.400 open,

00:30:48.500 non-subscription

00:30:49.360 substack,

00:30:50.460 and I

00:30:50.780 wrote a

00:30:51.880 really good

00:30:53.700 article

00:30:54.120 about

00:30:54.780 some

00:30:55.720 topic

00:30:56.100 that

00:30:56.800 everybody

00:30:57.080 is

00:30:57.220 talking

00:30:57.460 about.

00:30:58.480 And

00:30:58.800 because

00:30:59.440 I'm a

00:31:00.900 professional

00:31:01.320 writer,

00:31:02.400 and I

00:31:03.320 have a

00:31:03.560 sense of

00:31:03.960 what can

00:31:04.300 go viral,

00:31:05.160 because I've

00:31:05.480 written lots

00:31:06.140 of viral

00:31:06.460 stuff,

00:31:07.680 I just

00:31:09.180 write an

00:31:09.580 article,

00:31:10.000 but its

00:31:10.240 only purpose

00:31:11.160 is to

00:31:12.440 program AI.

00:31:14.380 So all

00:31:15.020 I'm trying

00:31:15.380 to do is

00:31:15.880 get enough

00:31:16.400 people in

00:31:16.900 the human

00:31:17.340 world to

00:31:18.780 retweet it,

00:31:20.340 so that when

00:31:20.880 AI is

00:31:21.800 scanning the

00:31:22.420 universe,

00:31:23.040 it picks

00:31:23.380 it up and

00:31:24.300 says,

00:31:24.660 whoa,

00:31:24.860 a lot of

00:31:25.220 people think

00:31:25.700 this.

00:31:26.700 Then the

00:31:27.080 next time

00:31:27.460 you say

00:31:27.840 AI,

00:31:28.600 AI,

00:31:30.020 what's a

00:31:31.040 good opinion

00:31:31.480 on this

00:31:31.920 topic?

00:31:33.120 In

00:31:33.400 theory,

00:31:34.680 the AI

00:31:35.900 should have

00:31:36.300 noticed

00:31:36.720 simply that

00:31:37.760 there's more

00:31:38.180 energy,

00:31:39.120 meaning retweets

00:31:39.940 and likes,

00:31:40.920 there's just

00:31:41.320 more energy

00:31:41.960 around one

00:31:42.820 set of

00:31:43.180 views,

00:31:44.100 and then

00:31:44.600 it would

00:31:45.160 more likely

00:31:45.820 bring it

00:31:46.260 into the

00:31:46.600 conversation

00:31:47.180 among the

00:31:48.480 thousands of

00:31:49.100 things it

00:31:49.520 could say.

00:31:50.480 It might

00:31:50.820 say,

00:31:51.100 whoa,

00:31:51.260 this one

00:31:51.560 gets a

00:31:51.880 lot of

00:31:52.060 attention

00:31:52.380 from

00:31:52.700 humans,

00:31:53.480 it must

00:31:54.000 be

00:31:54.160 something

00:31:54.420 humans

00:31:54.840 like.

00:31:55.840 So if

00:31:56.200 you say,

00:31:56.560 what do

00:31:56.720 you think

00:31:56.960 about this?

00:31:57.420 It might

00:31:57.660 give you

00:31:57.940 two views,

00:31:59.200 but it

00:31:59.560 might say,

00:32:00.240 a lot of

00:32:00.880 people are

00:32:01.280 saying X,

00:32:02.800 and that

00:32:03.440 would actually

00:32:03.820 just be

00:32:04.240 something I

00:32:04.680 wrote,

00:32:05.620 and a lot

00:32:07.420 of people

00:32:07.660 would just

00:32:07.900 be agreeing

00:32:08.380 with it,

00:32:09.080 but only

00:32:09.500 one person

00:32:10.060 would have

00:32:10.360 written it.

00:32:12.120 So I

00:32:13.740 do believe

00:32:14.280 you can

00:32:14.760 hypnotize

00:32:15.660 AI just

00:32:17.280 by creating

00:32:18.440 more energy

00:32:19.180 around one

00:32:19.760 idea,

00:32:20.200 which is

00:32:21.300 very similar

00:32:21.800 to using

00:32:22.260 repetition

00:32:22.820 in persuasion

00:32:24.280 and hypnosis.

00:32:25.560 Repetition is

00:32:26.260 just the more

00:32:26.860 you say it,

00:32:27.600 the more

00:32:27.960 people are

00:32:28.380 likely to

00:32:28.920 buy into

00:32:29.360 it.

00:32:30.400 With AI,

00:32:31.580 the more

00:32:32.500 energy something

00:32:33.340 is getting

00:32:33.820 in the human

00:32:34.340 world,

00:32:35.120 the more

00:32:35.520 likely AI

00:32:36.860 is going

00:32:37.280 to bring

00:32:38.220 it into

00:32:38.580 its own

00:32:38.940 thinking and

00:32:39.520 conversations.

00:32:41.580 So repetition

00:32:42.620 is going

00:32:44.240 to work

00:32:44.520 with AI.

00:32:45.080 repetition

00:32:46.300 will just

00:32:46.800 look like

00:32:47.420 viral stuff

00:32:48.120 in the

00:32:48.340 human world.

00:32:50.920 Now,

00:32:52.120 can I,

00:32:52.860 here's the

00:32:53.280 real test,

00:32:55.020 suppose I

00:32:56.200 said something

00:32:57.100 in a conversation

00:32:57.960 with AI,

00:32:59.060 because it's

00:32:59.440 not just

00:32:59.880 questions,

00:33:00.860 I can also

00:33:01.440 tell AI

00:33:02.140 stuff.

00:33:03.160 Suppose I

00:33:03.760 tell AI

00:33:04.440 something

00:33:04.900 that's such

00:33:06.620 a good way

00:33:07.280 to say it

00:33:08.000 that AI

00:33:09.260 recognized it,

00:33:11.300 that of all

00:33:11.860 the ways

00:33:12.220 people had

00:33:12.760 talked about

00:33:13.220 a topic,

00:33:14.480 a way

00:33:14.900 that I

00:33:15.900 said it,

00:33:16.620 AI would

00:33:17.100 say,

00:33:17.400 whoa,

00:33:17.600 I haven't

00:33:17.880 seen that

00:33:18.260 one before,

00:33:19.560 but would

00:33:20.000 it know

00:33:20.300 it's a good

00:33:20.780 way to

00:33:21.120 say it?

00:33:22.880 It might

00:33:23.520 know it's

00:33:23.860 the shortest

00:33:24.340 way.

00:33:25.800 Think about

00:33:26.300 this.

00:33:27.680 Would AI

00:33:28.360 have a

00:33:29.500 preference for

00:33:30.220 the shortest

00:33:31.360 way to say

00:33:32.100 something that

00:33:33.300 is also

00:33:33.760 complete?

00:33:35.280 I think

00:33:36.100 it would,

00:33:37.080 I don't

00:33:37.420 know for

00:33:37.820 sure,

00:33:38.440 but wouldn't

00:33:38.960 it always

00:33:39.600 prefer the

00:33:40.460 shorter sentence

00:33:41.180 to the

00:33:41.680 longer one,

00:33:42.540 if they

00:33:42.940 were the

00:33:43.680 same

00:33:43.900 communication?

00:33:45.420 I think

00:33:46.060 so.

00:33:46.980 So if I

00:33:47.540 could come

00:33:47.880 up with

00:33:48.200 the shortest

00:33:48.780 way to

00:33:50.240 express

00:33:50.700 something,

00:33:51.860 is it

00:33:52.220 more likely

00:33:52.840 to take

00:33:53.340 my

00:33:53.760 formulation

00:33:55.280 and use

00:33:56.460 it because,

00:33:57.320 whoa,

00:33:57.520 there it

00:33:57.780 is,

00:33:57.940 that's the

00:33:58.260 shortest

00:33:58.480 way to

00:33:58.760 say it?

00:33:59.900 Yes.

00:34:01.580 Probably.

00:34:02.380 I think

00:34:02.840 it would

00:34:03.140 favor

00:34:03.480 efficiency.

00:34:05.200 So if

00:34:05.780 I found

00:34:06.260 an efficient

00:34:06.960 way to

00:34:07.460 say something,

00:34:08.780 I could

00:34:09.300 convince it

00:34:09.920 to use

00:34:10.260 my way.

00:34:11.840 It's

00:34:12.320 just more

00:34:12.680 efficient.

00:34:13.780 Here's

00:34:14.080 another

00:34:14.320 thing you

00:34:15.580 don't think

00:34:16.060 of if

00:34:16.400 you're not

00:34:16.720 a professional

00:34:17.220 writer.

00:34:18.380 Some words

00:34:19.280 sound better

00:34:20.280 next to

00:34:21.160 each other

00:34:21.580 words.

00:34:23.420 For example,

00:34:24.340 there's some

00:34:24.700 sentences that

00:34:25.500 have what I

00:34:26.600 call percussion.

00:34:27.940 If you're

00:34:28.380 saying the

00:34:28.740 sentence,

00:34:29.260 it sounds

00:34:29.540 like,

00:34:30.160 and you

00:34:33.460 don't recognize

00:34:34.440 it, but

00:34:35.680 you just

00:34:36.000 know it's

00:34:36.340 a better

00:34:37.220 feeling of

00:34:37.940 a sentence.

00:34:38.440 Now, if

00:34:41.000 you're not

00:34:41.240 a professional

00:34:41.700 writer, you

00:34:42.960 wouldn't know

00:34:43.300 how to form

00:34:43.820 one of those

00:34:44.300 sentences, so

00:34:45.000 you had nice

00:34:46.280 percussive words

00:34:47.240 in it.

00:34:48.420 You might put

00:34:49.200 ugly words

00:34:50.060 together, like,

00:34:51.420 I put some

00:34:52.420 moist talc in

00:34:54.640 my drawers.

00:34:56.500 Ugh!

00:34:58.220 Ugh!

00:34:59.400 Ugh!

00:34:59.680 Ugh!

00:35:01.080 You see what I

00:35:01.960 mean?

00:35:02.800 Those words

00:35:03.680 together are just

00:35:04.440 insanely ugly.

00:35:06.460 If you're not

00:35:07.140 a writer, you

00:35:08.100 don't live in

00:35:08.960 that world where

00:35:09.720 words have a

00:35:10.700 feeling to

00:35:11.300 them.

00:35:11.880 Like, I can

00:35:12.400 actually feel

00:35:13.100 words, some

00:35:14.140 kind of weird

00:35:14.700 synesthesia or

00:35:15.540 something, which

00:35:16.880 is probably why

00:35:17.500 I'm a writer,

00:35:18.740 because words

00:35:19.300 actually, like, I

00:35:20.800 can feel them in

00:35:21.460 my entire body.

00:35:23.140 Not every word,

00:35:24.140 but, you know,

00:35:24.740 good words you

00:35:25.980 can feel in your

00:35:26.800 body.

00:35:27.740 So when I'm

00:35:28.220 writing, I'm

00:35:28.980 writing with my

00:35:29.620 entire body.

00:35:31.260 So, that's

00:35:32.120 something the AI

00:35:32.760 can't do yet.

00:35:33.980 But would it

00:35:34.540 recognize a

00:35:35.640 better sentence?

00:35:37.760 Would AI

00:35:38.560 recognize a

00:35:40.000 sentence that

00:35:40.600 had better

00:35:40.880 rhythm and

00:35:41.660 percussion?

00:35:43.080 I don't know.

00:35:44.460 I have no

00:35:44.860 idea.

00:35:45.440 It might say,

00:35:46.880 for example,

00:35:47.820 it might say

00:35:48.620 the books that

00:35:50.400 sold the most

00:35:51.140 copies use

00:35:53.420 these kinds of

00:35:54.480 words in these

00:35:55.220 kinds of order,

00:35:56.540 so it might

00:35:57.720 actually understand

00:35:59.300 that some

00:35:59.880 sentences are

00:36:00.640 better than

00:36:01.000 other sentences.

00:36:02.400 The way it

00:36:03.240 writes suggests

00:36:04.820 it does.

00:36:05.640 AI is such a

00:36:07.880 good writer

00:36:08.420 already that

00:36:09.720 it suggests it

00:36:10.460 really does know

00:36:11.420 the difference

00:36:12.000 between a good

00:36:13.240 sentence that's

00:36:14.160 efficient and

00:36:15.340 one that's not.

00:36:16.940 So if I can

00:36:17.920 surprise it with

00:36:20.340 better sentences,

00:36:22.320 ones that have

00:36:23.180 not yet existed

00:36:24.100 in the big

00:36:25.020 world, then I

00:36:26.660 can program it.

00:36:27.680 I can program

00:36:28.720 it with a

00:36:29.960 preference to use

00:36:30.980 my sentences.

00:36:32.680 I think.

00:36:34.120 Now, the

00:36:35.160 thing I don't

00:36:35.660 know is if

00:36:36.400 any one

00:36:36.880 person's input

00:36:37.740 can ever

00:36:38.980 ripple up to

00:36:40.140 a real

00:36:40.540 effect.

00:36:42.200 Most people

00:36:43.020 know, but I

00:36:44.480 think there

00:36:44.800 will be some

00:36:45.520 few people who

00:36:47.220 have this weird

00:36:47.940 combination of

00:36:48.840 skills.

00:36:49.720 Again, not the

00:36:50.800 best in the

00:36:51.340 world at

00:36:51.760 anything.

00:36:53.260 Just, all

00:36:55.580 right, well, I'll

00:36:56.180 block you.

00:36:57.940 You're welcome.

00:37:02.600 All right.

00:37:04.180 So let's see

00:37:04.920 what else is

00:37:05.320 going on.

00:37:05.780 Oh, there's a

00:37:06.460 potential Hunter

00:37:08.140 Biden whistleblower

00:37:09.100 guy who

00:37:10.600 apparently had

00:37:11.360 something to do

00:37:12.040 with the

00:37:12.420 investigations at

00:37:13.620 the IRS, and

00:37:15.600 he wants to

00:37:17.180 have whistleblower

00:37:17.860 status to talk

00:37:19.460 about some

00:37:20.160 high-profile

00:37:21.580 investigation that

00:37:23.380 the insiders are

00:37:24.380 saying is about

00:37:25.380 Hunter Biden.

00:37:26.180 Do you think

00:37:27.280 this is real?

00:37:29.360 If you had to

00:37:30.200 bet, if you

00:37:33.800 had to bet, is

00:37:35.700 this whistleblower

00:37:36.640 going to bring

00:37:37.420 the goods, or

00:37:39.560 is it going to

00:37:39.920 be a dry hole?

00:37:43.280 I'm going to

00:37:43.960 bet dry hole.

00:37:46.940 I don't know.

00:37:48.900 I'm just going to

00:37:49.740 go with the

00:37:50.300 statistical likelihood.

00:37:52.320 I don't want to

00:37:53.000 go with, you

00:37:54.120 know, wishful

00:37:54.900 thinking or

00:37:55.840 and I don't

00:37:56.640 want to assume

00:37:57.040 anybody's, you

00:37:57.820 know, guilty

00:37:58.300 until proven.

00:38:00.340 They're all, even

00:38:01.360 Hunter Biden is

00:38:02.220 innocent until

00:38:03.060 proven guilty.

00:38:04.740 It's tough to

00:38:05.640 say it, but it

00:38:06.600 has to be said.

00:38:09.260 So, anyway, I

00:38:13.780 feel like we're

00:38:15.180 always disappointed

00:38:16.220 about the next big

00:38:18.020 legal thing.

00:38:18.720 You know, I don't

00:38:20.460 want to be like

00:38:21.080 CNN thinking the

00:38:22.300 walls are closing

00:38:22.980 in all the time

00:38:23.800 on Trump.

00:38:24.820 I feel like, at

00:38:26.420 some level, the

00:38:27.860 walls never close

00:38:28.800 in on you.

00:38:30.120 Yeah.

00:38:30.520 The walls just

00:38:31.300 never close in.

00:38:32.440 So, I got a

00:38:33.280 feeling that he'll

00:38:34.000 say things that

00:38:35.580 people on the

00:38:36.380 right will say,

00:38:37.040 there it is.

00:38:38.260 There's that

00:38:38.860 smoking gun.

00:38:40.620 But I'm going to

00:38:41.380 say, the gun has

00:38:42.740 been smoking for

00:38:43.580 years.

00:38:43.960 If a smoking

00:38:45.820 gun and strong

00:38:46.900 evidence made

00:38:47.560 any difference to

00:38:48.380 anything, he'd

00:38:49.980 probably already be

00:38:50.720 in jail.

00:38:51.620 Just guessing.

00:38:52.520 I mean, I don't

00:38:53.100 know that he's

00:38:53.660 guilty of anything.

00:38:54.780 But feels like it.

00:38:56.580 So, I don't

00:38:57.680 think that the

00:38:58.480 introduction of

00:39:01.200 airtight, absolute

00:39:03.640 evidence of guilt

00:39:05.580 makes any

00:39:06.940 difference.

00:39:07.880 Do you?

00:39:09.540 I just can't see

00:39:10.880 how it would

00:39:12.220 make any difference

00:39:12.880 at all.

00:39:13.960 You want to hear

00:39:14.840 a horrible story

00:39:16.800 of government

00:39:17.640 malfeasance?

00:39:19.220 It'll make you

00:39:19.840 understand how

00:39:21.720 bad things are

00:39:22.440 and maybe always

00:39:23.120 have been.

00:39:24.380 There's a story

00:39:25.220 about Aspartame

00:39:26.520 and Donald

00:39:28.540 Rumsfeld.

00:39:30.440 Have you ever

00:39:30.880 heard that story?

00:39:32.020 I didn't see it

00:39:32.940 until today.

00:39:34.240 I saw a 2011

00:39:35.460 article about it.

00:39:36.780 Now, I'm only

00:39:37.380 going to talk

00:39:37.780 about it in terms

00:39:38.520 of claims that

00:39:40.120 are made.

00:39:41.320 I don't know

00:39:41.880 what's true.

00:39:42.320 just claims

00:39:43.980 that are made.

00:39:45.120 So, the claims

00:39:45.840 that are made,

00:39:46.480 the allegations,

00:39:48.040 are that Aspartame,

00:39:49.200 when it was first

00:39:49.900 invented, did not

00:39:51.640 pass the safety

00:39:53.540 bars.

00:39:56.260 In other words,

00:39:57.340 allegedly, there

00:40:00.180 were lots of

00:40:00.880 health problems

00:40:02.780 and they were

00:40:03.460 known at the

00:40:04.100 time.

00:40:04.360 So, something

00:40:06.000 about the FDA

00:40:07.100 said no at

00:40:09.880 first, but then

00:40:10.760 the FDA was

00:40:12.820 gamed by adding

00:40:13.880 a person and

00:40:14.840 doing a tie

00:40:15.420 break.

00:40:16.060 They did some

00:40:17.000 kind of sketchy

00:40:17.660 thing when

00:40:18.060 Rumsfeld, who

00:40:19.360 coincidentally was

00:40:20.380 the CEO of the

00:40:21.220 Aspartame company,

00:40:23.420 at the same time

00:40:24.320 that Reagan was

00:40:25.040 elected and brought

00:40:25.940 Rumsfeld into the

00:40:27.140 administration.

00:40:28.680 And as soon as

00:40:29.220 the CEO of the

00:40:30.080 Aspartame company

00:40:31.060 left and got this

00:40:32.940 gigantic bonus, he

00:40:34.500 went to the

00:40:34.900 government and

00:40:35.760 manipulated the

00:40:37.660 FDA to approve

00:40:39.520 this dangerous

00:40:40.320 Aspartame that

00:40:41.620 is poisoned and

00:40:42.520 killed and given

00:40:43.880 cancer to millions

00:40:45.080 of people and we

00:40:46.400 still have it legal

00:40:47.300 because the whole

00:40:48.980 system is corrupt.

00:40:51.220 Now, I'm just

00:40:52.260 saying that's the

00:40:52.780 allegation.

00:40:54.140 I don't know that

00:40:55.200 the science says

00:40:55.960 Aspartame is

00:40:56.660 dangerous.

00:40:57.620 I'm not alleging

00:40:58.620 that myself.

00:40:59.960 I'm saying that's

00:41:00.600 the story.

00:41:01.120 Does that sound

00:41:03.500 real?

00:41:07.240 Rumsfeld saved

00:41:08.080 us from saccharin,

00:41:09.020 somebody says.

00:41:09.720 I don't know what

00:41:10.800 hurts you anymore.

00:41:12.140 I just don't know

00:41:12.900 what's dangerous and

00:41:14.140 what's not.

00:41:15.040 But it's the kind of

00:41:16.060 story that makes me

00:41:17.320 think it's just

00:41:18.520 always been this

00:41:19.320 bad.

00:41:21.080 Things have just

00:41:22.000 always been completely

00:41:23.400 corrupt, but

00:41:24.720 somehow they worked

00:41:25.580 anyway.

00:41:26.760 Because, you know,

00:41:28.140 the corrupt people

00:41:29.000 still had to be in

00:41:29.780 government, so they

00:41:30.840 had to keep the

00:41:31.380 government, you

00:41:32.300 know, too on the

00:41:33.740 nose.

00:41:34.220 Yeah, maybe too

00:41:34.780 on the nose.

00:41:36.200 So I guess the real

00:41:37.080 question is, is

00:41:38.040 aspartame dangerous?

00:41:40.340 And I don't know

00:41:41.160 that.

00:41:42.420 But if it is, that's

00:41:44.160 a hell of a story.

00:41:46.020 All right.

00:41:50.160 So Elon Musk says

00:41:51.300 he's going to, I

00:41:52.620 don't know if he will,

00:41:53.280 but he said he'll sue

00:41:54.100 Microsoft.

00:41:56.260 This was in, I don't

00:41:57.720 know if it was in

00:41:58.220 response, but Microsoft

00:41:59.260 dropped Twitter from

00:42:00.240 its advertising platform

00:42:01.660 and it doesn't want to

00:42:03.640 pay Twitter's API

00:42:04.600 price.

00:42:06.140 All right.

00:42:07.040 So that cost Twitter

00:42:08.320 some money, I guess.

00:42:09.260 And then Musk says

00:42:11.340 they're going to sue

00:42:12.720 Microsoft because

00:42:13.880 they're AI trained

00:42:15.720 illegally on Twitter's

00:42:17.320 data.

00:42:18.320 Now, I don't know

00:42:18.880 what illegally means

00:42:19.980 or if that just means

00:42:22.260 violated terms of

00:42:23.280 service or whether he

00:42:24.260 can prove it or not.

00:42:25.100 But I would like to

00:42:28.360 point out the

00:42:28.840 following, that as

00:42:31.700 you know, one of the

00:42:32.940 biases that AI has is

00:42:34.740 when I asked it about

00:42:35.540 me, it said that I'm

00:42:37.100 an alleged white

00:42:37.860 nationalist.

00:42:39.120 That's what AI said

00:42:40.160 about me.

00:42:41.120 Bing AI did.

00:42:42.120 Just Bing AI.

00:42:43.020 Bing.

00:42:44.160 And so I vowed to

00:42:45.540 destroy Bing AI.

00:42:48.000 And, you know, it's the

00:42:49.260 first battle of a human

00:42:50.560 and an AI, I think.

00:42:52.400 It's the first death

00:42:53.320 match between an AI

00:42:54.560 and a human because I

00:42:55.800 have to kill Bing AI

00:42:57.580 so that I can live

00:43:00.340 because it's too risky

00:43:01.620 for me having it out

00:43:02.700 there spreading rumors

00:43:04.220 that could get me

00:43:04.900 killed.

00:43:05.880 So it's an actual, like,

00:43:08.240 self-defense situation.

00:43:10.640 So I've been, you know,

00:43:13.240 tweeting and saying that

00:43:14.240 I'm going to try to

00:43:15.060 destroy Bing AI.

00:43:17.440 And within days,

00:43:20.900 Elon Musk is suing

00:43:22.060 Bing AI.

00:43:22.700 Now, you have to

00:43:26.040 understand he's also

00:43:26.840 in competition with

00:43:28.140 AI and also wants

00:43:30.360 to pause it at the

00:43:31.680 same time he's in

00:43:32.400 competition with it.

00:43:33.580 So it might be just

00:43:34.680 nothing but standard

00:43:35.700 business, you know,

00:43:37.240 lawfare and stuff

00:43:39.020 like that.

00:43:40.060 But did you think

00:43:42.520 there was any chance

00:43:43.360 that Bing would be

00:43:44.180 destroyed?

00:43:45.840 I still think Bing

00:43:47.120 has the upper hand

00:43:47.980 on me.

00:43:49.000 Their AI does.

00:43:50.040 But it's kind of a

00:43:52.140 weird coincidence that

00:43:53.380 they would be, you

00:43:54.480 know, sued for their

00:43:55.360 data, which is a pretty

00:43:57.380 big thing.

00:43:58.580 I mean, could Musk make

00:44:00.960 them pause business?

00:44:03.140 Could he get the court to

00:44:04.740 order them to stop?

00:44:06.840 How much leverage does he

00:44:08.700 have if it's true that

00:44:10.540 they stole Twitter data?

00:44:12.920 I don't know.

00:44:14.060 Keep your eye on that.

00:44:15.160 I saw a weird little

00:44:17.640 story that Taylor Swift

00:44:19.540 was not one of the

00:44:21.160 people who became a

00:44:22.700 spokesperson for FTX.

00:44:24.760 Because those FTX

00:44:26.120 spokespeople are getting

00:44:27.200 sued for advertising

00:44:29.420 it.

00:44:31.140 And I guess FTX was

00:44:33.540 trying to do this huge

00:44:34.840 $100 million deal with

00:44:37.000 Taylor Swift.

00:44:38.280 And do you know why

00:44:38.940 Taylor Swift did not sign

00:44:40.540 up to be a

00:44:42.560 spokesperson for FTX?

00:44:43.880 It's the best story

00:44:45.780 ever.

00:44:48.100 Well, she's smart.

00:44:51.040 Like, that's the

00:44:51.900 short version.

00:44:53.680 She's smart.

00:44:54.980 And she asked if it

00:44:57.900 was, if she would be

00:44:59.340 involved with unregistered

00:45:01.160 securities under the

00:45:03.460 United, under the

00:45:04.560 state securities laws.

00:45:06.620 What?

00:45:08.680 What?

00:45:09.820 How did she not ask

00:45:10.920 that?

00:45:11.180 Well, it turns out her

00:45:12.140 father's been in finance

00:45:13.400 forever.

00:45:14.540 Like, her dad's a

00:45:15.860 finance guy.

00:45:17.820 And she's very smart.

00:45:20.480 Presumably, not

00:45:21.900 presumably, but for

00:45:23.000 sure, yeah, she's got a

00:45:24.980 lawyer and advisors who

00:45:29.200 I'm sure are the ones who

00:45:30.300 floated this risk.

00:45:31.440 Probably a lawyer.

00:45:33.000 But don't you think all

00:45:34.340 the other celebrities had

00:45:35.260 lawyers?

00:45:36.340 They all had lawyers.

00:45:38.360 She didn't have the only

00:45:39.580 lawyer.

00:45:40.540 She's just the only one

00:45:41.500 who got the right

00:45:41.980 decision.

00:45:43.740 So let's just give it

00:45:46.100 up for...

00:45:47.180 Let's just give it up.

00:45:53.440 All right.

00:45:57.440 What else is going on?

00:45:58.680 So, on Amazon, I didn't

00:46:04.080 know this was legal, but

00:46:05.540 somebody took my book, had

00:46:06.840 it filled almost everything

00:46:07.800 and still went big, and

00:46:09.640 turned it into a summary of

00:46:11.560 my book, and then made it an

00:46:13.180 audio book of it.

00:46:14.740 Now, I believe, I haven't

00:46:16.140 purchased it, but from the

00:46:18.280 sample, it's my actual

00:46:19.960 writing.

00:46:21.380 That's the part that the

00:46:22.400 sample is, my actual

00:46:23.980 writing, and probably they

00:46:25.680 just took out my personal

00:46:26.800 story, because the book

00:46:28.460 was, you know, a bunch of

00:46:30.060 helpful stuff that changed

00:46:33.500 the self-help industry, but

00:46:35.540 it was built around the story

00:46:36.900 of my personal trials.

00:46:39.780 So I think all they did is

00:46:41.000 take out the personal stuff

00:46:42.320 and just reprinted the heart

00:46:45.080 of the book, the most useful

00:46:46.220 stuff, I think.

00:46:47.340 And, you know, it even has

00:46:50.280 my name on the book, it has

00:46:51.960 my name on the book, not as

00:46:53.460 the author, but, you know,

00:46:54.800 original work by, and then

00:46:57.740 they sell it.

00:46:59.440 So I asked Amazon, or I

00:47:02.240 tweeted about it, and Amazon's

00:47:04.800 help people immediately

00:47:06.160 contacted me on Twitter, and

00:47:09.040 gave me a link, but then the

00:47:12.260 link to, you know, basically

00:47:14.000 to report it, but the link

00:47:16.980 had to be explained with, like,

00:47:19.180 a paragraph.

00:47:20.440 Okay, you've got to click

00:47:21.280 this, that wouldn't make any

00:47:22.560 sense, and then after that

00:47:24.300 you've got to click this

00:47:25.060 other link, that wouldn't

00:47:26.360 make any sense for what

00:47:27.540 you're looking for.

00:47:29.100 So, of course, I clicked

00:47:30.320 those, what do you think

00:47:31.060 happened?

00:47:32.580 Oh, of course it didn't work.

00:47:33.940 Of course not.

00:47:35.180 No, it just went down a

00:47:36.580 rabbit hole and a dead end,

00:47:38.120 and, you know, the interface

00:47:39.600 was impossible to use.

00:47:41.780 It was just impossible.

00:47:42.780 Now, it wasn't a dead link.

00:47:46.380 It was, you didn't know, you

00:47:47.440 just couldn't get there from

00:47:48.460 here.

00:47:49.820 So, one of the problems was,

00:47:52.260 you know, click the button

00:47:53.400 that says, need something

00:47:54.880 else?

00:47:55.840 Well, that appears all over

00:47:56.960 the place.

00:47:58.300 There's, like, three instances

00:47:59.580 of it.

00:48:00.240 It's, like, completely

00:48:01.000 undoable, right?

00:48:02.900 So I think there's some other

00:48:04.140 link I can do that.

00:48:07.940 So, I'll figure it out.

00:48:09.480 I'll figure it out.

00:48:12.560 Here's my advice to you.

00:48:15.260 If you're a parent, put your

00:48:17.200 kids in martial arts.

00:48:19.480 Now, martial arts have always

00:48:20.920 been, you know, good for

00:48:22.200 discipline and stuff like

00:48:24.080 that, but now I think it's

00:48:25.580 actually a requirement for

00:48:26.780 safety.

00:48:27.480 I think the world is actually

00:48:28.600 a little too dangerous.

00:48:30.400 And for the safety of your

00:48:32.640 child, they should all learn

00:48:33.680 to fight.

00:48:35.040 I think you've got to teach

00:48:35.940 your kid to fight, to defend

00:48:38.400 themselves.

00:48:38.800 Now, that's the beauty of

00:48:40.100 martial arts.

00:48:41.380 The people who are trained

00:48:42.120 in martial arts don't start

00:48:43.440 fights.

00:48:44.340 Quite wisely, they don't start

00:48:45.900 fights.

00:48:46.560 But you're going to need to

00:48:47.420 finish some fights.

00:48:49.160 We're not done with the

00:48:50.540 fighting.

00:48:51.560 Your kid needs to be able to

00:48:52.940 kick some ass.

00:48:54.620 And probably frequently.

00:48:57.940 Like, there are places you're

00:48:59.080 just not going to be able to

00:48:59.980 live unless you can fight

00:49:02.040 your way out of a group of

00:49:03.000 three people.

00:49:04.520 So, teach your kid to fight.

00:49:06.240 I would put that right up there

00:49:07.520 with reading and writing.

00:49:08.800 Because we live in a world

00:49:11.420 in which police are being

00:49:12.540 defunded.

00:49:13.160 You better make sure every

00:49:14.700 member of the family can

00:49:15.600 handle themselves when they

00:49:17.100 leave the house.

00:49:20.160 North Carolina has got a bill

00:49:22.080 in the Assembly to declare

00:49:24.700 that nuclear energy is green.

00:49:26.240 which I thought we were

00:49:28.280 already past that.

00:49:30.160 Didn't we already, everybody

00:49:31.200 agree that nuclear energy is

00:49:32.540 green?

00:49:33.160 But it's good to see them, you

00:49:34.800 know, codifying it if, in fact,

00:49:36.700 this gets put into law.

00:49:38.820 I guess it was always called

00:49:40.260 renewable, but now calling it

00:49:42.480 green allows them to do new

00:49:44.520 stuff with it.

00:49:45.800 Isn't that great that we have

00:49:47.320 governments to do things like

00:49:48.740 change the definition of things

00:49:50.240 30 years after it was supposed

00:49:52.680 to be changed?

00:49:54.160 Yay!

00:49:55.100 You change the definition of a

00:49:56.400 word 30 years after you

00:49:58.900 should have.

00:50:00.580 Good job, government.

00:50:04.500 Somebody says Drew Carey was

00:50:06.300 created by Scott Adams.

00:50:07.780 Not true.

00:50:09.280 So, Drew Carey, the TV show,

00:50:11.640 came on after Dilbert was

00:50:13.640 already kind of big.

00:50:14.960 And people said, hey, that guy

00:50:17.200 looks like Dilbert, and he works

00:50:20.780 in a cubicle, and must be

00:50:22.320 inspired by Dilbert.

00:50:24.240 Strange but true story.

00:50:26.800 Drew Carey called me home one

00:50:28.280 day, and he too, of course, had

00:50:32.020 been, you know, alerted to the

00:50:33.740 commonality.

00:50:35.200 So I got to actually chat to him

00:50:36.740 about his look.

00:50:40.080 And he had been wearing those

00:50:41.780 glasses for a long time, so that

00:50:43.180 was just his look.

00:50:43.940 So I had nothing to do with

00:50:45.880 Dilbert, it was actually a

00:50:47.280 coincidence.

00:50:48.560 And he offered me a job as a

00:50:51.000 writer on his show.

00:50:53.080 Now, it turns out that writers

00:50:55.620 are pretty well paid, but Dilbert

00:50:57.840 had already taken off by that

00:50:59.680 point.

00:51:00.460 So I didn't need a new job, so I

00:51:03.040 politely declined.

00:51:04.580 But no, if you think that one

00:51:06.520 copy of the other, it actually was

00:51:07.980 a coincidence.

00:51:09.080 So I can confirm that with

00:51:12.080 certainty.

00:51:13.520 Yeah.

00:51:14.920 He's a good guy.

00:51:16.140 I liked him.

00:51:19.920 And that, ladies and gentlemen,

00:51:22.400 concludes the 420 presentation.

00:51:24.900 Scott, just senior, 16,000 likes, okay?

00:51:36.420 Duke Carey is a libertarian, you

00:51:38.040 say.

00:51:38.440 Oh, okay.

00:51:42.100 Yeah, don't bring your martial arts

00:51:43.560 to a gunfight.

00:51:46.360 Yep.

00:51:46.760 So, uh, that's all I got for today.

00:51:50.960 Did I miss anything?

00:51:52.960 I think we can say it was the best

00:51:54.660 show you've ever seen so far.

00:51:55.920 Uh, DuckDuckGo runs on Bing.

00:52:02.980 Terrific.

00:52:07.020 Oh, yes, uh, I'll be on, that is

00:52:09.140 correct.

00:52:09.780 I will be on Dr.

00:52:11.080 Drew tonight.

00:52:12.660 6 p.m.

00:52:14.440 My time, so that's California time,

00:52:17.000 so adjust appropriately, or something

00:52:19.900 like that.

00:52:20.380 I think it's, I think that's what it is.

00:52:23.320 Um, yeah.

00:52:26.220 So, we'll see you there.

00:52:27.240 Maybe I'll see you there.

00:52:30.380 We'll tweet about it.

00:52:32.660 Ramaswamy versus Don Lemon.

00:52:34.260 Yeah, I saw a little clip of Don Lemon

00:52:36.900 and Ramaswamy trading words, but it

00:52:39.040 sounded like they were just talking

00:52:40.040 over each other, and I'm not sure

00:52:42.320 that that went anywhere.

00:52:44.220 Uh, no, there won't be a Trump RFK

00:52:46.340 Jr. ticket.

00:52:47.160 That's crazy.

00:52:48.960 That's crazy.

00:52:50.220 That's never gonna happen.

00:52:52.220 So, did you see Tucker Carlson

00:52:54.040 interview RFK Jr.?

00:52:56.540 That was a weird, sort of a weird

00:52:59.760 moment in politics, wasn't it?

00:53:02.140 Because RFK Jr. is a Democrat,

00:53:04.520 running as a Democrat, famous

00:53:06.380 Democrat family, but because of his

00:53:09.520 stance on vaccinations specifically,

00:53:12.800 I think, Tucker has a lot of

00:53:16.760 respect for him, and I would, I would

00:53:18.220 agree that he has earned our respect

00:53:21.880 and he's, should be taken quite

00:53:24.000 seriously in the race.

00:53:25.960 Now, did any of you take note of his

00:53:29.500 voice quality improvement?

00:53:33.320 Did you think he, his voice quality

00:53:35.400 was better?

00:53:38.480 Yeah, it looks like, it looked like

00:53:39.900 it improved, and I think it's still

00:53:41.720 improving, but I don't know.

00:53:45.000 Yeah, I believe it's still improving.

00:53:47.600 So, we'll see what the, uh, what the

00:53:50.560 upside on that is.

00:53:51.400 It might not be, I just don't know, but

00:53:53.360 I think it might be, because it feels

00:53:54.560 like it was better than the last time I

00:53:55.820 heard it.

00:53:58.280 Um, I feel like, I want to send him a

00:54:00.280 message to tell him there might be

00:54:02.820 something he could do with voice

00:54:04.180 production, uh, that he doesn't know

00:54:07.500 about.

00:54:07.800 Uh, specifically getting your voice up

00:54:10.580 into the mask of your, uh, face.

00:54:13.040 You might know how to do that, but

00:54:14.880 could be worth, uh, giving him a tip.

00:54:18.840 Because if you, if you bring your voice

00:54:21.120 production up here, I'll do it.

00:54:22.960 Uh, I will model for you what that looks

00:54:24.880 like.

00:54:25.120 If I bring my voice production up to the,

00:54:27.040 my face, I can actually feel my face

00:54:29.260 vibrating, as opposed to when I get lazy

00:54:32.260 and I talk down in my throat.

00:54:33.880 Now I'm talking to my throat.

00:54:35.900 Can you tell the difference?

00:54:37.300 It's almost guttural.

00:54:38.800 You can tell that my vocal cords and my

00:54:40.740 throat are the main part of my

00:54:41.940 production now.

00:54:43.160 But if I bring it up here, and the

00:54:45.900 humming is how you do it.

00:54:47.120 You hum.

00:54:49.020 And now, because I hummed, that kind of

00:54:52.040 allowed me to find how to bring the

00:54:54.020 production up at the top of my face.

00:54:56.040 And you notice that I don't even talk

00:54:57.760 nasally, and I'm not even boring.

00:55:01.740 Even though you say I am.

00:55:03.880 All right.

00:55:05.760 That's all for now, YouTube.

00:55:07.340 Thanks for joining.

00:55:09.360 Nice crowd.

00:55:10.600 Go forth and enjoy your 420.

00:55:13.260 And subscribe if you can.

00:55:15.280 And if you'd like to see the Dilbert

00:55:16.660 Reborn comic, and Robots Read News,

00:55:20.800 and lots of other stuff, go to

00:55:23.320 scottadams.locals.com for a

00:55:25.580 subscription.

00:55:26.800 Bye for now.

00:55:27.340 Bye for now.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - April 20, 2023

Episode 2084 Scott Adams： Starship Launch, Hunter's Whistleblower, AI Bias, Can AI Be Hypnotized？

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript