Real Coffee with Scott Adams - April 22, 2023


Episode 2086 Scott Adams: SCOTUS Rules On Abortion Pill, Trans "Regret" Is Way Lower Than You Think


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 6 minutes

Words per Minute

143.09155

Word Count

9,447

Sentence Count

737

Misogynist Sentences

13

Hate Speech Sentences

31


Summary

60 Minutes is covering the Ray Epps case, and it looks like they re just covering the news. And why would NBC be covering a story that looks like it s part of a CIA cover-up? And why are they doing it?


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do.
00:00:07.860 So I just noticed something when I went into my little drawer I always go into.
00:00:12.220 I don't know why, but there was still a mask in that drawer.
00:00:17.160 I don't even keep them in there. I don't know why it was in there.
00:00:20.200 But are you finding masks, like old masks, sort of in pockets and closets and drawers everywhere?
00:00:28.880 And every time you see one, doesn't your heart just, like, drop?
00:00:34.540 It's like, oh, God, no. Garbage.
00:00:41.080 All right, well, welcome to the highlight of civilization.
00:00:44.580 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and aren't you glad you're here?
00:00:48.260 Well, you will be in a minute.
00:00:50.780 And all you need to take this experience up to levels that nobody's ever seen before
00:00:55.680 is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a cello, a stein, a canteen, a jug, a flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:01:02.460 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.
00:01:06.000 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine of the day.
00:01:10.320 The thing that makes everything better.
00:01:12.560 It's called the simultaneous sip.
00:01:14.720 It happens now.
00:01:16.180 Go.
00:01:16.380 Well, summer's here, whether you like it or not.
00:01:28.060 At least where I live, it's all warm weather from now on for the rest of the time.
00:01:32.960 All right, let's talk about the news.
00:01:34.180 It's funny when you associate with people who have become experts at interpreting the news
00:01:43.540 versus before I started talking about politics and being on Twitter.
00:01:49.440 I thought the news was sort of the news.
00:01:54.100 You know, silly me.
00:01:55.320 I thought that if it was on the news, it was probably important.
00:01:58.540 And they looked into it, and then they told me the facts.
00:02:00.820 Now, when I see a story on that 60 Minutes is going to do a big piece on Ray Epps
00:02:09.200 and how innocent he is and unfairly accused of being a Fed,
00:02:13.580 do you feel the same?
00:02:15.820 Do you look at that story and say to yourself,
00:02:17.560 well, there's a useful story in which 60 Minutes will give us the accurate details
00:02:22.360 as they have researched it?
00:02:25.300 Is that how you...
00:02:26.660 Not anymore, huh?
00:02:30.000 Yeah.
00:02:30.820 Yeah, it seems like those days are over.
00:02:33.340 Yes, now when we see that 60 Minutes is covering the Ray Epps story,
00:02:37.900 it looks like nothing but a Democrat op.
00:02:41.260 It's an op.
00:02:42.420 It doesn't even look like the news.
00:02:44.780 Like, I can't even...
00:02:46.160 I can't even, like, force my brain to see it as a legitimate news story.
00:02:51.280 It's purely narrative manipulation.
00:02:54.480 Now, let me say as clearly as possible, I don't know what's going on with Ray Epps.
00:03:03.560 I do think he's innocent until proven guilty.
00:03:09.040 Innocent until proven guilty.
00:03:10.480 I'm going to stick with that standard as long as I can.
00:03:14.160 So I don't assume he's guilty of anything.
00:03:16.540 I just know that the story is very anti-Democrats winning the presidency.
00:03:21.900 And if Biden can't sell this January 6th thing, he doesn't have much to sell.
00:03:28.400 Because otherwise, he's just not looking good compared to, you know, Trump's performance on a lot of stuff.
00:03:34.120 So, they've got to do something.
00:03:37.400 So to me, it looks like 60 Minutes is just being a good Democrat
00:03:40.360 and trying to take the steam out of the Ray Epps accusations.
00:03:45.540 Be they true or be they not, I wouldn't know.
00:03:48.640 But innocent until proven guilty.
00:03:50.940 Innocent until proven guilty.
00:03:53.420 All right, likewise, here's another story that I'm not seeing as just news.
00:03:58.140 So NBC is covering the charges against Hunter.
00:04:06.040 And I guess Ken Delanian is one of the people in the story.
00:04:09.320 He's one of four people in the story.
00:04:11.340 And if you don't know, the Glenn Greenwalds, et cetera,
00:04:15.520 like to accuse NBC of being part of a CIA operation, basically.
00:04:21.140 And so it's curious.
00:04:23.880 Why are they covering the Hunter is being considered for four different charges?
00:04:31.840 And the investigation was done over a year ago.
00:04:36.820 So even NBC is reporting that people are frustrated that charges have not been brought
00:04:43.180 because the investigation's been over for a long time.
00:04:47.300 Now, what's going on here?
00:04:49.860 What's going on?
00:04:50.880 Are they really just covering the news?
00:04:55.000 Because it is the story.
00:04:56.480 As far as I know, the story, it looks accurately told compared to other news entities.
00:05:04.180 So why would NBC, that we suspect is not just a news organization,
00:05:11.440 why would they report this this way?
00:05:13.160 Because it looks like it's useful, fair, and bad for Democrats.
00:05:17.880 Why would they do that?
00:05:18.760 Well, one of the things you need to do is catch up with stories after they've passed you.
00:05:26.660 So in order to remain a news entity, or for people to even think they're a news entity,
00:05:33.380 I have to laugh at this comment.
00:05:40.580 In all caps, Mahat is saying,
00:05:42.760 Scott, you are still talking about Hunter Biden's laptop, LOL.
00:05:46.860 Well, do you think Hunter Biden's laptop is not newsworthy?
00:05:55.080 Because NBC thinks of this.
00:05:57.840 You know who else thinks it's newsworthy today?
00:06:01.000 Every major news organization.
00:06:03.700 All of them.
00:06:07.100 All right.
00:06:07.760 That was a good try there.
00:06:12.940 Here's how I interpret NBC covering it.
00:06:16.820 They have to cover it because the cat's already so far out of the bag.
00:06:21.480 If they don't cover it at all, you won't ever listen to any bullshit they have in the future.
00:06:26.480 So basically, they have to catch up to the truth once the truth is thoroughly understood,
00:06:32.900 because then they can lie to you more effectively in the future,
00:06:36.760 because you'll think to yourself, well, they covered the news up till now.
00:06:40.480 So probably this next thing they say is the news too, instead of just an operation.
00:06:44.880 So that's what it looks like.
00:06:48.620 So the two big news stories today, neither of them look like real news,
00:06:53.200 even though they might be accurate.
00:06:54.980 I'm not saying that the news is inaccurate.
00:06:57.400 I'm saying that the reason they're covering it and why they're doing it now
00:07:00.900 and the way they're doing it has everything to do with manipulating the voters
00:07:05.020 and nothing to do with the news.
00:07:07.380 That's what it looks like.
00:07:08.360 But that would be speculation, because I'm not a mind reader.
00:07:12.600 I'm not a mind reader.
00:07:13.760 I'm just telling you what it looks like.
00:07:17.580 All right.
00:07:18.720 Wall Street editorial board is taking a big old crap on Randy Weingarten's head.
00:07:25.720 So she's head of the big teachers union.
00:07:28.520 And she has been opposed to collate locating charter schools in public schools.
00:07:35.060 Did you know that was a thing?
00:07:36.140 I just learned about this today.
00:07:39.120 Apparently, there are a number of public school facilities that have plenty of extra room.
00:07:45.700 And charter schools are also publicly sanctioned schools.
00:07:50.040 They're not private.
00:07:51.540 I don't know if they can be.
00:07:53.140 But a charter school would be something the government is supporting,
00:07:56.660 as opposed to something that's a purely private school.
00:07:59.260 So the charter schools say, hey, why can't we use some of that publicly funded excess public school building?
00:08:09.620 And other people say, yeah, why not?
00:08:12.780 Perfectly good idea.
00:08:14.400 You know, it's already public.
00:08:15.580 It's already public.
00:08:16.560 It's already paid for.
00:08:17.360 It's empty.
00:08:18.260 And all of this is public, too.
00:08:19.880 So put the two public things in the public facility.
00:08:22.060 Do you know who opposes that idea?
00:08:26.680 Randy Weingarten.
00:08:28.820 Because anything that's good for black people, she seems to oppose.
00:08:33.060 I don't know if that's a coincidence, but there's a pattern that seems pretty clear.
00:08:37.860 That anything that's good for school choice, she seems to oppose.
00:08:42.920 Now, it turns out, the story that got the Wall Street Journal editorial board on her,
00:08:50.940 is that there is one exception.
00:08:53.740 And the one exception is, apparently, there's one charter school that the teachers union have some control over.
00:09:00.280 And they want that one to be co-located.
00:09:02.340 So she can't even be consistent with her own preference.
00:09:06.900 As long as it's good for Randy Weingarten, she's for it.
00:09:11.620 That seems to be the only rule.
00:09:13.940 Now, how in the world does she keep her job?
00:09:18.740 I guess she must do a good job for the members, according to their opinion.
00:09:24.160 Because she has to be voted in, right?
00:09:26.360 Doesn't she have to be voted in?
00:09:29.080 There must be some ballot stuffing going on or something.
00:09:31.660 No, she's probably doing a good job for the members.
00:09:36.600 But unfortunately, that seems to be at the expense of children,
00:09:40.340 and especially at the expense of black kids, more so than others, I think.
00:09:45.020 So in terms of, if you're looking for the source of systemic racism,
00:09:49.820 well, it's everywhere, but the school system is the worst,
00:09:54.500 and the teachers union is the biggest cause of that.
00:09:57.140 All right.
00:10:02.980 You know, there's a thing that the Democrats do consistently
00:10:06.960 that every time you see it, you just shake your head,
00:10:10.460 and you go, seriously?
00:10:13.660 Seriously.
00:10:14.900 That's your idea.
00:10:16.320 Here's another one.
00:10:17.020 There's this new rule going into effect May 1st,
00:10:21.520 that homebuyers with good credit will pay $40 more for their good credit
00:10:26.740 to help fund the people with bad credit
00:10:30.500 so that people with bad credit can get houses just like people with good credit.
00:10:35.240 So I don't even have to tell you what's wrong with that, right?
00:10:42.760 If you reverse rewards so that you get rewarded for bad credit
00:10:48.880 and penalized for good credit,
00:10:51.040 that would be more of what the Democrats do everywhere,
00:10:54.740 which is ignore the human incentive and motivation variable,
00:10:59.520 which is the big one, right?
00:11:02.180 It would be, you know, it would be understandable
00:11:05.420 if there were some small variables that got ignored,
00:11:09.140 but not the big one.
00:11:12.480 Why would you ignore the biggest variable,
00:11:15.300 which is how people are motivated?
00:11:17.460 That's how they're going to act.
00:11:19.240 They're going to act on motivation.
00:11:21.720 And money works every time.
00:11:23.260 So you could say to me, well, these are small amounts,
00:11:27.860 but it's all part of the same system
00:11:29.760 of penalizing the successful
00:11:32.440 and giving rewards to the people who didn't do the right stuff.
00:11:38.600 Right stuff according to getting better credit.
00:11:44.940 What's that?
00:11:47.040 All right.
00:11:47.480 So would you also say that the rule is racist?
00:11:53.800 Is that rule racist?
00:11:56.780 Who do you think are the people with the high credit?
00:12:01.200 On average, it's going to be white Americans
00:12:03.200 and Asian Americans, right?
00:12:07.180 So the white Americans and the Asian Americans
00:12:09.280 will pay more for their good credit.
00:12:11.800 And who do you think will be the beneficiaries?
00:12:13.660 Largely black people and people of color
00:12:18.160 with lower credit.
00:12:20.960 So why is it not racist?
00:12:24.820 It's not racist?
00:12:27.760 Here's the problem.
00:12:28.980 100% of the things that the government does are racist.
00:12:33.760 Do you know why?
00:12:35.120 Because it can't not be.
00:12:36.960 There's not an option to be non-racist.
00:12:39.220 Everything the government does
00:12:40.600 has a disproportionate effect on somebody.
00:12:44.640 I'm not saying it's all bad.
00:12:46.320 It might be exactly what you wanted.
00:12:48.240 But there's nothing they can do
00:12:49.840 that doesn't disproportionately affect people.
00:12:52.580 Because, you know, well, it's obvious.
00:12:55.420 Anything you do is going to affect the rich people
00:12:57.540 or the poor people in a different way.
00:12:59.660 There are more of one type in each category.
00:13:03.140 So therefore, there's a racial component
00:13:04.700 to literally everything.
00:13:06.560 I'm going to tell you about my fascinating conversation
00:13:11.660 with a member of Black Lives Matter next
00:13:14.100 because it fits perfectly into this theme.
00:13:18.760 All right, so this was a user
00:13:20.120 who just calls himself Huey Pease Student.
00:13:23.940 10.PG, that's his name on Twitter.
00:13:27.060 And he looks to be identifying as black.
00:13:30.720 And he's got BLM in his...
00:13:33.280 He seems to be a Black Lives Matter supporter.
00:13:35.420 So there's a little battle going on
00:13:40.440 among some various black...
00:13:43.480 I guess activists would be the right...
00:13:45.400 Just people who are active
00:13:47.500 in trying to make things better.
00:13:49.260 I don't know if activist is a fair word.
00:13:53.000 Because sometimes people are just active
00:13:54.980 trying to make things better.
00:13:57.120 So he would be one of these people
00:13:58.700 who's active trying to make things better
00:14:00.840 in the way that he thinks will work.
00:14:03.780 And he got into a debate with...
00:14:07.640 I think it was King Randall,
00:14:09.000 which is actually his name.
00:14:10.180 I think his first name is actually King.
00:14:12.760 Do you follow King Randall on Twitter?
00:14:16.000 You should.
00:14:17.400 You should.
00:14:18.360 Because he's a contrarian
00:14:21.020 in the sense that his major theme
00:14:24.700 is you work on the individuals
00:14:27.020 and the education and the parents,
00:14:28.860 and you really work on the people specifically.
00:14:32.440 And if you can get the people
00:14:33.660 to be more effective,
00:14:35.480 then they can blast through the,
00:14:37.240 you know, whatever racism there is.
00:14:39.060 Because there will always be racism.
00:14:41.300 Right?
00:14:41.720 You can work on racism,
00:14:43.700 but it's still going to be there.
00:14:45.640 So King Randall has more
00:14:47.640 of a personal responsibility
00:14:49.140 kind of a take on it.
00:14:51.140 And he's...
00:14:51.860 Apparently he's got a school
00:14:53.180 that's privately funded
00:14:54.880 that's primarily for...
00:14:56.660 I think it's primarily
00:14:57.440 or only for black kids.
00:14:58.740 I don't know.
00:14:59.540 But it seems to be working,
00:15:01.260 and he's working with the parents
00:15:02.440 of the black kids.
00:15:03.520 And I can only tell
00:15:05.600 from what he tweets,
00:15:06.980 so I don't have personal information
00:15:08.580 on the ground.
00:15:09.700 But it looks really strong,
00:15:12.620 as in it looks like exactly
00:15:14.220 the right mindset to be promoting,
00:15:17.520 and it looks like
00:15:18.360 he's getting some traction on that.
00:15:19.940 So there's a debate
00:15:23.280 between some of the black factions
00:15:26.100 who say, you know,
00:15:27.160 work on education
00:15:28.060 and just make everybody
00:15:29.480 as effective as they can,
00:15:31.160 and that's your best play.
00:15:32.660 And the others who think
00:15:34.020 it's more of a systemic problem
00:15:35.440 and you should be putting
00:15:36.300 your emphasis on the system
00:15:37.820 more than, you know...
00:15:39.860 Now, everybody thinks
00:15:41.060 both are important,
00:15:42.620 just to be clear.
00:15:44.000 Everybody thinks
00:15:44.820 you should work on individuals
00:15:46.100 to make them successful.
00:15:47.860 Everybody thinks
00:15:48.480 there's systemic racism
00:15:50.020 of some kind.
00:15:51.360 But there is a difference
00:15:52.480 in what you emphasize.
00:15:54.800 You know, do you emphasize
00:15:55.400 one versus the other?
00:15:57.100 So, Huey P's student,
00:16:00.160 that's his Twitter name,
00:16:02.120 got into a little back and forth
00:16:03.560 with me on this stuff.
00:16:05.040 I'm backing King Randall.
00:16:06.900 His view of making individuals
00:16:09.520 as superpowered as possible,
00:16:12.280 and that's your best play
00:16:13.740 in the long run,
00:16:14.480 even for getting rid
00:16:15.360 of systemic racism.
00:16:16.800 Imagine if tomorrow
00:16:18.900 every black student
00:16:21.180 started over-performing
00:16:23.080 every other student,
00:16:25.560 just, you know,
00:16:26.200 as a mental exercise.
00:16:28.160 Don't you think
00:16:28.740 systemic racism
00:16:29.700 would be a lot less
00:16:30.780 in a generation?
00:16:32.680 It would kind of
00:16:33.440 take care of itself.
00:16:34.800 Success and money
00:16:35.860 are the two things
00:16:36.660 that solve almost everything.
00:16:38.440 You know,
00:16:38.840 did O.J. Simpson,
00:16:40.460 before he got in legal troubles,
00:16:42.560 did he have a big problem
00:16:43.960 with being black?
00:16:45.740 No.
00:16:47.020 As O.J. used to say,
00:16:48.660 I'm not black,
00:16:49.340 I'm O.J.
00:16:50.240 Because once you're successful,
00:16:52.100 then you're just seen
00:16:52.760 as the successful person.
00:16:54.700 You know,
00:16:54.900 your race just becomes
00:16:56.160 a secondary thing.
00:16:57.920 So that's, you know,
00:16:59.500 a reasonable way
00:17:00.380 to play it
00:17:01.300 is just to make yourself successful.
00:17:04.020 So I got into this conversation
00:17:08.140 with this Black Lives Matter
00:17:10.360 activist type of guy.
00:17:13.560 And he said,
00:17:16.560 don't you think you should,
00:17:19.180 he said this in a tweet to me,
00:17:20.920 don't you think eradicating racism
00:17:22.640 is a good place to start
00:17:24.340 to make everything better?
00:17:26.740 What do you think
00:17:27.200 of that statement?
00:17:28.700 Don't you think eradicating racism
00:17:30.700 is a good place to start?
00:17:32.000 My answer to that was,
00:17:34.480 that's the dumbest place to start.
00:17:37.320 That's the dumbest place to start.
00:17:39.040 That's the worst thing you could do.
00:17:41.140 Do you know why?
00:17:42.680 How do you ever get
00:17:43.580 to the second step?
00:17:46.020 Where's the second step?
00:17:48.480 If your first step
00:17:49.660 is literally impossible,
00:17:51.900 how do you get rid of racism?
00:17:53.580 That's not going to happen.
00:17:54.700 You could reduce it,
00:17:55.960 and we all agree to do that.
00:17:58.060 I think 100% of us say,
00:18:00.220 well, yeah,
00:18:00.640 if there's something you could do
00:18:02.280 to reduce racism,
00:18:04.060 of course.
00:18:05.060 Why wouldn't you?
00:18:06.520 But as a first step,
00:18:09.520 that's the worst advice
00:18:12.180 of all time.
00:18:14.060 And I've heard some bad advice.
00:18:16.600 So I said,
00:18:19.340 no, that's actually
00:18:20.180 the dumbest place to start.
00:18:22.020 That is the dumbest place to start.
00:18:25.000 The first place to start
00:18:26.400 is making individuals
00:18:27.860 more successful.
00:18:30.440 Making sure education
00:18:31.820 is working for everybody.
00:18:33.280 Making sure people
00:18:33.880 have a strategy.
00:18:36.220 And
00:18:36.260 so this is
00:18:40.720 what I get back.
00:18:43.660 So you're saying
00:18:44.960 that black people
00:18:45.740 should just accept
00:18:46.700 unfair treatment
00:18:47.600 and not speak out?
00:18:49.740 What's that?
00:18:51.480 What's that called?
00:18:52.420 So you're saying
00:18:54.100 that black people
00:18:54.760 should just accept
00:18:55.640 unfair treatment
00:18:56.460 and not speak out?
00:18:58.900 Yeah,
00:18:59.520 it's the so tell.
00:19:01.180 It means he's already
00:19:02.440 lost the argument
00:19:03.580 and he's starting to
00:19:04.540 have cognitive dissonance.
00:19:07.100 All right.
00:19:07.640 Because nobody can disagree
00:19:09.260 with the statement
00:19:09.960 that working on
00:19:11.000 racism first
00:19:12.240 is a bad idea
00:19:13.500 compared to working
00:19:15.180 on yourself first.
00:19:16.360 And also working on racism.
00:19:17.820 But that's
00:19:19.160 that's got to be
00:19:19.740 the background
00:19:20.360 effort for society
00:19:22.620 not for you
00:19:23.280 necessarily as an individual.
00:19:26.040 So
00:19:26.180 yeah,
00:19:27.840 so he's already
00:19:28.320 off the rails.
00:19:30.400 Should not affect
00:19:31.400 So what do I say
00:19:32.940 about fairness?
00:19:34.340 Let's say your goal
00:19:35.280 is fairness
00:19:35.820 and he's used the word
00:19:36.700 fair a few times.
00:19:38.060 What do I say
00:19:38.620 about fairness?
00:19:39.640 I've said this forever.
00:19:41.420 Fairness was invented
00:19:42.620 as a concept
00:19:43.540 concept of fairness
00:19:44.840 so that children
00:19:46.180 and idiots
00:19:46.820 would have something
00:19:47.440 to argue about.
00:19:49.020 Because smart people
00:19:50.020 don't argue about fairness.
00:19:52.120 They just don't.
00:19:53.780 It's only a dumb person
00:19:55.040 argument.
00:19:55.820 Because the dumb people
00:19:57.020 don't have any
00:19:57.660 anything else to say.
00:20:00.000 So they're like
00:20:00.820 well
00:20:01.160 it's not
00:20:02.600 well
00:20:04.660 what do you think
00:20:05.460 it's not
00:20:06.360 fair.
00:20:07.640 It's not fair.
00:20:09.080 Right?
00:20:09.320 Because you can make
00:20:09.900 fair mean anything
00:20:10.680 you want.
00:20:11.660 So it's sort of
00:20:12.340 how dumb people
00:20:12.940 and children argue.
00:20:13.940 It's not fair.
00:20:15.180 Now in the real world
00:20:16.240 there are plenty
00:20:16.680 of things that
00:20:17.360 we would all agree
00:20:18.400 are not fair.
00:20:20.000 And sure
00:20:20.740 try to do something
00:20:22.440 about it.
00:20:23.600 But again
00:20:24.300 it's not where
00:20:26.280 you start.
00:20:27.700 Right?
00:20:27.960 Where you start
00:20:28.560 is with the individual.
00:20:29.900 You also try to get
00:20:31.140 something that feels
00:20:32.760 fair over time.
00:20:34.940 But that's not
00:20:35.860 that can't be your focus.
00:20:37.640 If you want to be
00:20:38.520 successful.
00:20:39.720 All right.
00:20:39.920 So what do you think
00:20:40.460 he did then?
00:20:41.860 So then I
00:20:42.360 I think I said
00:20:45.080 something about
00:20:45.600 using strategy
00:20:46.380 instead.
00:20:47.400 And I said that
00:20:48.540 for example
00:20:49.680 a black person
00:20:52.880 who is qualified
00:20:53.860 has a big advantage
00:20:55.420 in a fortune 500
00:20:56.640 company getting hired.
00:20:58.540 Now what do you think
00:20:59.560 the Black Lives Matter
00:21:01.060 advocate said
00:21:02.020 when I stated this
00:21:03.920 what I believe
00:21:04.620 is a fact
00:21:05.240 that a black applicant
00:21:07.640 with good credentials
00:21:08.840 would have a big
00:21:10.320 advantage in a
00:21:11.160 fortune 500 company.
00:21:12.560 What do you think
00:21:13.020 his response was?
00:21:14.640 He said
00:21:15.360 I'm lying.
00:21:17.440 I'm lying.
00:21:18.560 And it's a lie
00:21:19.180 that white people
00:21:19.880 tell all the time.
00:21:21.360 And then he showed
00:21:22.240 some research
00:21:23.000 to show that
00:21:24.120 there's plenty
00:21:24.780 of racism
00:21:25.420 in hiring
00:21:26.240 in corporate America.
00:21:28.480 Do you see
00:21:28.880 what he did?
00:21:29.920 That wasn't my argument.
00:21:31.760 When did I argue
00:21:32.540 that racism
00:21:33.620 doesn't exist?
00:21:35.460 I never said that.
00:21:36.980 When did I say
00:21:37.680 it doesn't exist
00:21:38.420 in hiring
00:21:38.980 and when did I say
00:21:40.460 that there are
00:21:41.060 no black people
00:21:42.160 being discriminated against?
00:21:44.100 Never said that.
00:21:45.440 I assume there's
00:21:46.200 massive discrimination
00:21:47.220 in hiring.
00:21:48.200 I would assume
00:21:48.860 that if you're
00:21:49.340 a black applicant
00:21:50.120 and you go to
00:21:51.280 a Korean grocery store
00:21:52.820 I'll just pick
00:21:54.060 one random example
00:21:55.040 you probably have
00:21:56.140 less chance
00:21:56.780 of getting hired
00:21:57.400 than if you were
00:21:57.980 a Korean.
00:21:59.220 Just guessing.
00:22:00.500 I mean I'm not
00:22:01.060 blaming anybody
00:22:01.660 in particular.
00:22:02.700 I'm not blaming
00:22:03.300 the Koreans
00:22:03.860 or anything like that.
00:22:05.400 I'm just saying
00:22:05.940 in general
00:22:06.800 a small family business
00:22:09.600 it's going to be
00:22:10.980 a little bit
00:22:11.480 more discriminating
00:22:12.440 than what I said.
00:22:14.540 Did I say
00:22:15.100 every big and small
00:22:16.100 company
00:22:16.600 prefers black people?
00:22:18.620 No.
00:22:19.400 I said
00:22:19.980 a Fortune 500
00:22:21.440 company
00:22:22.000 specifically
00:22:22.880 the ones
00:22:23.940 everybody's
00:22:24.420 watching carefully
00:22:25.360 are starving
00:22:27.700 for more diversity
00:22:30.020 because they have
00:22:30.820 to answer
00:22:31.220 to that master.
00:22:32.260 They can't not
00:22:33.980 do it.
00:22:35.180 The big companies
00:22:35.920 have to
00:22:36.880 try hard
00:22:38.080 to get
00:22:38.940 black and
00:22:39.940 female
00:22:40.820 and LGBTQ
00:22:41.640 they have to.
00:22:44.240 So
00:22:44.440 and by the way
00:22:46.700 I call this
00:22:47.560 the
00:22:47.860 Black Lives Matter
00:22:49.820 well.
00:22:51.180 I've showed you
00:22:51.960 this before
00:22:52.520 that if you defeat
00:22:53.600 an argument
00:22:54.140 that's just
00:22:54.880 a terrible argument
00:22:55.780 they always retreat
00:22:57.180 to the next obvious
00:22:58.240 level of defense
00:22:59.500 then the next obvious
00:23:00.940 one
00:23:01.140 the next obvious one
00:23:02.000 and you just keep
00:23:02.880 mowing the lawn
00:23:03.980 until you get down
00:23:05.980 to the last argument
00:23:06.900 and then it's just
00:23:07.680 an insult
00:23:08.200 right?
00:23:09.600 What's the last
00:23:10.580 argument?
00:23:11.600 The last argument
00:23:12.320 is a personal insult.
00:23:13.860 Do you think
00:23:14.260 he went for the
00:23:14.840 personal insult?
00:23:16.400 Of course he did.
00:23:17.700 He decided that
00:23:18.720 the real problem
00:23:19.420 is that I said
00:23:20.300 a racist thing
00:23:21.500 and he wants
00:23:23.340 to talk about
00:23:23.820 that now.
00:23:25.460 Well what about
00:23:26.200 my argument?
00:23:28.640 So I pointed out
00:23:29.600 that
00:23:29.920 that I had
00:23:32.700 four instances
00:23:33.560 of losing careers
00:23:34.820 for being
00:23:35.440 a white male.
00:23:37.640 Now you know
00:23:38.260 all four
00:23:38.740 right?
00:23:39.200 Two corporate
00:23:39.820 careers
00:23:40.620 where my bosses
00:23:42.020 told me
00:23:42.540 in direct words
00:23:43.640 we can't promote
00:23:45.100 you because
00:23:45.540 you're white
00:23:46.040 and male.
00:23:47.000 Direct.
00:23:48.040 Nothing beating
00:23:49.060 around the bush.
00:23:50.300 Told me to my face
00:23:51.500 directly
00:23:52.120 can't promote
00:23:53.300 you're white
00:23:53.980 and you're male.
00:23:55.880 now my
00:23:59.320 debate partner
00:24:01.060 here
00:24:01.480 says that
00:24:03.140 that was
00:24:03.840 anecdotal.
00:24:05.600 It was anecdotal
00:24:06.980 that I lost
00:24:07.940 four careers
00:24:08.960 in a row
00:24:09.460 for being a
00:24:10.520 white guy.
00:24:11.440 Four.
00:24:12.560 The other one
00:24:13.360 was my
00:24:14.160 animated cartoon
00:24:15.860 which I wasn't
00:24:17.700 fired for being
00:24:18.400 white
00:24:18.820 but it was a
00:24:19.900 comic about a
00:24:20.620 white guy
00:24:21.060 and they decided
00:24:22.240 that Monday night
00:24:22.960 was going to be
00:24:23.500 the African American
00:24:24.500 comedy night
00:24:25.520 so it didn't
00:24:26.840 fit in its
00:24:27.560 time slot
00:24:28.180 and once you
00:24:28.980 lose your
00:24:29.300 time slot
00:24:29.860 you're kind
00:24:30.960 of screwed.
00:24:31.700 That's what
00:24:31.980 happened to us.
00:24:33.340 So it wasn't
00:24:34.580 direct
00:24:35.040 but had I been
00:24:36.560 African American
00:24:37.360 I would have
00:24:38.000 still had a
00:24:38.440 TV show
00:24:38.960 and likewise
00:24:40.500 when I got
00:24:41.140 cancelled from
00:24:41.800 cartooning
00:24:42.560 100% of people
00:24:44.240 agree
00:24:44.660 that had I
00:24:45.580 been black
00:24:46.240 I could have
00:24:47.220 said anything
00:24:47.660 I wanted.
00:24:48.860 Everybody agrees
00:24:49.580 with that.
00:24:50.520 You know I
00:24:51.240 wouldn't have
00:24:51.500 been cancelled
00:24:51.960 if I'd been
00:24:52.460 black.
00:24:53.420 So
00:24:53.660 those are
00:24:54.880 four examples
00:24:55.600 just with
00:24:56.500 one person
00:24:57.280 just one
00:24:58.560 person.
00:24:59.940 Now
00:25:00.100 his response
00:25:02.180 was that
00:25:02.560 was anecdotal
00:25:03.320 and my
00:25:04.540 response to
00:25:05.080 that was
00:25:05.540 I don't
00:25:07.360 I also
00:25:07.980 agree that
00:25:08.680 anecdotal
00:25:09.380 evidence
00:25:09.840 is not
00:25:10.820 persuasive.
00:25:12.560 Here would
00:25:13.120 be the one
00:25:13.540 exception
00:25:13.980 if it's
00:25:15.880 100%
00:25:16.540 of the
00:25:16.880 anecdotes
00:25:17.400 if it's
00:25:18.740 100%
00:25:19.500 and I
00:25:20.620 said just
00:25:21.240 talk to
00:25:21.700 any white
00:25:23.040 male
00:25:23.420 who works
00:25:24.480 in a
00:25:24.920 fortune
00:25:25.220 500
00:25:25.700 company
00:25:26.240 anyone
00:25:27.240 100%
00:25:28.680 you will
00:25:29.500 get 100%
00:25:30.580 common
00:25:31.180 experience
00:25:31.840 for the
00:25:32.640 last 30
00:25:33.220 years.
00:25:34.220 Nobody will
00:25:34.940 have a
00:25:35.200 different
00:25:35.400 opinion.
00:25:36.260 Everybody
00:25:36.520 will have
00:25:36.880 the same
00:25:37.200 observation
00:25:37.800 and the
00:25:38.580 same
00:25:38.780 lived
00:25:39.040 experience.
00:25:40.200 Now
00:25:40.380 only the
00:25:41.200 white males
00:25:41.780 other people
00:25:43.020 are not
00:25:43.360 going to
00:25:43.520 be
00:25:44.120 up on
00:25:45.900 what their
00:25:46.220 experience is.
00:25:47.540 But
00:25:47.840 I do
00:25:48.820 believe in
00:25:49.320 anecdotal
00:25:50.020 evidence
00:25:50.560 when it's
00:25:51.040 every piece
00:25:52.200 of evidence.
00:25:53.620 Every single
00:25:54.240 piece.
00:25:55.260 Right?
00:25:57.320 You know
00:25:57.980 you don't
00:25:58.300 think that
00:25:58.780 oxygen is
00:25:59.560 poison.
00:26:00.980 Because
00:26:01.580 100%
00:26:02.520 of humans
00:26:03.020 seem to be
00:26:03.520 okay breathing
00:26:04.360 oxygen.
00:26:05.560 Nobody's ever
00:26:06.280 died from
00:26:06.820 breathing oxygen.
00:26:08.900 So do I
00:26:09.440 need a study
00:26:10.120 to find that
00:26:11.300 oxygen is
00:26:12.120 good for
00:26:12.460 people?
00:26:13.500 Not really.
00:26:14.900 Because 100%
00:26:16.160 of every
00:26:16.960 human being
00:26:17.660 ever needs
00:26:19.140 oxygen.
00:26:19.960 I don't
00:26:20.160 have to
00:26:20.420 study that
00:26:20.880 one.
00:26:22.740 All right.
00:26:25.080 But so
00:26:26.320 as is
00:26:28.420 often the
00:26:28.780 case,
00:26:29.100 once I
00:26:29.560 clarified that
00:26:30.380 I meant
00:26:30.620 fortune 500
00:26:31.420 companies,
00:26:32.180 it didn't
00:26:32.320 make any
00:26:32.660 difference,
00:26:33.060 it just
00:26:33.300 turned into
00:26:33.760 a personal
00:26:34.840 insult.
00:26:35.760 But I'd
00:26:36.360 like to
00:26:36.640 introduce a
00:26:37.320 new form
00:26:39.140 of insulting
00:26:40.400 narrative
00:26:42.140 wordplay.
00:26:43.120 I call
00:26:45.420 it black
00:26:47.000 words of
00:26:47.600 thinking.
00:26:48.440 Black
00:26:48.860 words
00:26:49.120 thinking.
00:26:50.200 And that
00:26:50.520 is a
00:26:50.740 tendency
00:26:51.060 for the,
00:26:51.920 let's say
00:26:52.200 the Black
00:26:53.240 Lives Matter
00:26:53.860 types with
00:26:54.920 that mindset
00:26:55.440 to be
00:26:56.460 looking
00:26:56.880 backwards
00:26:58.140 in a
00:27:00.460 black
00:27:01.200 context.
00:27:03.000 And that
00:27:03.640 black words
00:27:04.220 thinking will
00:27:04.820 never compete
00:27:05.540 against forward
00:27:06.580 thinking.
00:27:07.560 So if you
00:27:08.160 think you're
00:27:08.580 going to
00:27:08.780 compete
00:27:09.080 against the
00:27:09.660 Asian
00:27:09.920 Americans
00:27:10.440 by looking
00:27:11.660 backwards,
00:27:12.220 black words,
00:27:14.640 it's not
00:27:15.000 going to
00:27:15.180 work.
00:27:16.180 If you
00:27:16.440 think you're
00:27:16.780 going to
00:27:16.980 compete with
00:27:17.440 white Americans
00:27:18.240 by looking
00:27:19.420 black words
00:27:20.440 and complaining,
00:27:21.920 good luck.
00:27:23.500 Good luck.
00:27:24.580 You're not
00:27:24.960 going to be
00:27:25.300 competitive.
00:27:26.300 You don't
00:27:26.560 have a chance.
00:27:28.060 Now,
00:27:29.160 did I say
00:27:29.800 anything about
00:27:30.800 racism not
00:27:32.060 existing?
00:27:32.760 No.
00:27:33.780 Systemic
00:27:34.340 racism is
00:27:35.060 real.
00:27:36.400 We should
00:27:36.840 definitely
00:27:37.220 take a look
00:27:37.900 at doing
00:27:38.280 whatever we
00:27:38.920 can,
00:27:39.740 wherever we
00:27:40.580 can to
00:27:41.040 minimize it.
00:27:41.660 Absolutely.
00:27:42.820 I'm 100%
00:27:43.640 on board.
00:27:44.940 But you
00:27:45.640 should worry
00:27:46.180 about your
00:27:46.640 own future
00:27:47.440 as your
00:27:48.780 primary concern.
00:27:50.400 And there's
00:27:50.880 plenty of
00:27:51.280 people who
00:27:51.600 help you.
00:27:53.000 Plenty of
00:27:53.520 people who
00:27:53.820 help.
00:27:55.000 If you're
00:27:55.980 a serious
00:27:56.580 person who
00:27:57.240 wants to
00:27:57.660 seriously
00:27:58.120 succeed,
00:27:59.460 find any
00:28:00.400 other successful
00:28:01.400 people and
00:28:02.580 they will all
00:28:03.220 help you.
00:28:04.300 There's a
00:28:04.840 little trick
00:28:05.240 for you.
00:28:06.080 There's one
00:28:06.660 you didn't
00:28:06.980 know.
00:28:08.220 Successful
00:28:08.780 people love
00:28:10.360 to help
00:28:10.920 people who
00:28:12.160 are not
00:28:12.440 yet successful.
00:28:14.120 With this
00:28:14.740 one caution,
00:28:17.440 only if you
00:28:18.080 look like a
00:28:18.620 good bet.
00:28:20.000 Do you
00:28:20.220 know what
00:28:20.400 makes you
00:28:20.700 look like a
00:28:21.220 good bet?
00:28:22.980 Mindset and
00:28:24.060 character.
00:28:25.340 You get that
00:28:26.160 right?
00:28:27.140 You get your
00:28:27.680 mindset and
00:28:28.280 your character
00:28:28.760 right.
00:28:29.640 Search out a
00:28:30.360 successful person
00:28:31.300 and say,
00:28:31.720 I want to be
00:28:32.100 like you.
00:28:33.020 Can you teach
00:28:33.680 me how to
00:28:34.640 do this?
00:28:35.700 The answer
00:28:36.180 is going to
00:28:36.440 be yes.
00:28:36.980 Yeah, I
00:28:37.920 can teach
00:28:38.300 you that.
00:28:39.420 How about
00:28:39.840 a job?
00:28:40.580 You look
00:28:40.920 awesome.
00:28:42.500 Yeah.
00:28:43.340 Being successful
00:28:44.420 is strategy.
00:28:46.400 It's knowing
00:28:46.980 what works
00:28:47.580 and what
00:28:47.900 doesn't and
00:28:48.920 then putting
00:28:49.960 together the
00:28:50.580 things that
00:28:51.000 work and
00:28:51.960 then executing.
00:28:53.360 It works
00:28:53.980 basically 100%
00:28:55.580 of the time.
00:28:56.580 Nothing's 100%,
00:28:57.620 but you know
00:28:57.960 what I mean.
00:28:58.820 Basically 100%
00:28:59.900 of the time.
00:29:01.080 Good character,
00:29:02.880 learning how to
00:29:03.760 succeed or
00:29:04.640 showing the
00:29:05.540 mindset that
00:29:06.180 you're trying
00:29:06.620 to learn
00:29:07.060 how to
00:29:07.400 learn how
00:29:07.820 to succeed.
00:29:08.720 All those
00:29:09.380 things are
00:29:09.820 just gold.
00:29:11.340 Those things
00:29:11.920 will be good.
00:29:13.380 But looking
00:29:13.980 at your
00:29:15.060 past injustices
00:29:16.980 and then talking
00:29:18.120 continuously about
00:29:19.160 how they're
00:29:19.500 holding you
00:29:19.960 back,
00:29:20.540 don't want
00:29:21.200 to be around
00:29:21.680 you.
00:29:22.760 Now, my
00:29:23.300 conversation
00:29:23.780 with Huey
00:29:24.900 Pease's
00:29:25.320 student here
00:29:26.020 turned into
00:29:28.340 him saying,
00:29:29.620 but then I
00:29:30.240 saw in the
00:29:30.920 news that you
00:29:31.500 said you
00:29:32.640 should move
00:29:33.000 away from
00:29:33.380 all black
00:29:33.840 people,
00:29:34.700 to which I
00:29:35.400 responded.
00:29:36.900 You still
00:29:37.400 believe the
00:29:37.900 news?
00:29:41.140 That's really
00:29:41.820 the best
00:29:42.200 response.
00:29:43.380 Do you
00:29:43.940 think you
00:29:44.780 heard the
00:29:45.440 context of
00:29:46.060 that?
00:29:46.960 Do you
00:29:47.180 think you
00:29:47.500 understand what
00:29:48.240 I said and
00:29:48.800 why?
00:29:49.740 Of course
00:29:50.160 not.
00:29:52.440 Anybody who
00:29:53.240 still says they
00:29:53.980 believe the
00:29:54.440 news about a
00:29:56.240 story about a
00:29:56.940 public figure,
00:29:58.180 you have some
00:29:58.880 explaining to do,
00:29:59.700 not the public
00:30:00.240 figure.
00:30:01.320 You have to
00:30:01.860 explain why
00:30:02.380 you're so
00:30:02.760 fucking dumb
00:30:03.620 that you
00:30:04.280 think the
00:30:04.640 news about
00:30:05.260 public figures
00:30:06.380 has a good
00:30:07.660 chance of
00:30:08.080 being accurate
00:30:08.700 and in
00:30:09.760 context and
00:30:10.540 complete.
00:30:11.700 You got some
00:30:12.580 explaining to do
00:30:13.340 if you believe
00:30:13.820 in the news.
00:30:14.360 that's, yeah, I
00:30:17.320 know who
00:30:18.300 Huey P is.
00:30:19.940 So then he
00:30:24.700 said, blah,
00:30:25.700 blah, blah, you
00:30:26.180 think white
00:30:28.400 people should move
00:30:29.140 away from black
00:30:29.820 people?
00:30:30.120 and I
00:30:30.520 corrected him
00:30:31.140 and I
00:30:31.340 said, I
00:30:33.480 said that
00:30:33.960 white people
00:30:34.680 and black
00:30:35.660 people should
00:30:36.200 move away
00:30:36.620 from you
00:30:37.200 because you
00:30:38.960 have a
00:30:39.260 corrosive
00:30:39.760 mindset.
00:30:40.360 I'm paraphrasing
00:30:41.000 that.
00:30:41.420 You didn't
00:30:41.780 use those
00:30:42.180 exact words.
00:30:43.400 But the
00:30:43.660 point was,
00:30:44.540 yeah, black
00:30:45.040 people should
00:30:45.520 move away
00:30:45.900 from you,
00:30:47.240 Black Lives
00:30:47.740 Matter supporter,
00:30:48.760 because you're
00:30:49.180 bad for them.
00:30:50.680 You're taking
00:30:51.180 them down the
00:30:51.640 wrong path.
00:30:52.780 Yes, absolutely,
00:30:54.460 white people
00:30:55.000 and black
00:30:55.600 people should
00:30:56.560 move away
00:30:56.960 from this
00:30:57.360 guy and
00:30:58.320 anybody who
00:30:58.820 has this
00:30:59.120 mindset.
00:31:00.120 Be they
00:31:00.620 white or
00:31:01.160 black, get
00:31:02.500 the hell
00:31:03.100 away from
00:31:03.500 that.
00:31:04.720 If you
00:31:05.920 can't fix
00:31:06.480 them, and
00:31:07.340 it's pretty
00:31:07.760 hard to do,
00:31:08.620 just get some
00:31:09.260 distance.
00:31:09.780 You don't
00:31:09.980 want to be
00:31:10.240 around anybody
00:31:10.980 who thinks
00:31:11.380 you're the
00:31:11.780 problem.
00:31:13.580 All right.
00:31:17.180 So I'm
00:31:17.860 sure that my
00:31:19.180 last tweet will
00:31:19.880 just make him
00:31:20.380 hate me for
00:31:20.960 some reason.
00:31:22.120 Okay, the
00:31:22.820 abortion pill,
00:31:23.660 let's talk
00:31:23.960 about that.
00:31:25.580 So the
00:31:26.140 Supreme
00:31:26.440 Court, in
00:31:27.620 a mysterious
00:31:28.280 ruling,
00:31:28.900 one, let's
00:31:30.840 see, they
00:31:31.460 granted the
00:31:33.120 request by
00:31:34.240 the blah, blah,
00:31:34.840 blah, to
00:31:35.240 intervene.
00:31:36.440 So the
00:31:37.000 earlier judge
00:31:38.060 had stopped
00:31:38.680 the abortion
00:31:40.120 pill from,
00:31:41.620 or tried to
00:31:42.400 stop it from
00:31:42.880 being available.
00:31:43.980 Supreme
00:31:44.400 Court took
00:31:44.860 it up and
00:31:45.260 they said,
00:31:45.620 no, you
00:31:46.060 can't stop
00:31:46.660 it from
00:31:46.960 being, you
00:31:48.140 can't stop
00:31:48.880 it from
00:31:49.200 being available.
00:31:50.560 So that
00:31:51.280 means it
00:31:51.680 is available.
00:31:52.180 So the
00:31:53.040 Supreme
00:31:53.300 Court has
00:31:53.820 ruled,
00:31:55.000 somewhat
00:31:55.620 confusingly,
00:31:57.660 that you
00:31:59.020 can have
00:31:59.380 access to
00:31:59.940 your abortion
00:32:00.400 pill.
00:32:01.760 Now, let's
00:32:03.620 do a little
00:32:04.260 speculating
00:32:05.540 here, because
00:32:06.000 we can't
00:32:06.420 read their
00:32:06.760 minds.
00:32:07.860 Are you
00:32:08.200 surprised that
00:32:09.300 a conservative
00:32:10.120 majority came
00:32:12.300 up with that
00:32:12.780 ruling?
00:32:13.720 Are you
00:32:14.020 surprised?
00:32:15.440 No?
00:32:16.460 Not surprised.
00:32:17.220 Okay.
00:32:17.880 Now, is that
00:32:18.360 because you
00:32:19.560 believe that the
00:32:21.120 conservatives
00:32:22.460 are more
00:32:23.160 literal, and
00:32:24.780 therefore it's
00:32:25.460 not political,
00:32:27.540 rather it is
00:32:28.540 really just,
00:32:30.720 yes, okay.
00:32:33.520 So I'm not
00:32:34.800 sure I
00:32:35.260 completely buy
00:32:36.060 into that, but
00:32:36.540 I see where
00:32:36.920 you're going
00:32:37.260 with that.
00:32:38.080 I get your
00:32:38.880 point.
00:32:39.480 You know, the
00:32:39.780 people who
00:32:40.360 are trying to
00:32:40.920 be literalists,
00:32:42.320 in theory, you
00:32:44.540 should trust
00:32:45.060 them over
00:32:45.780 someone who
00:32:46.300 doesn't say
00:32:46.980 they want to
00:32:48.080 be literal.
00:32:49.340 Or what do
00:32:50.040 they call it?
00:32:50.540 Originalists,
00:32:51.120 right?
00:32:51.400 The originalists,
00:32:52.720 as in interpret
00:32:53.520 the Constitution
00:32:54.280 the way it
00:32:54.660 was originally
00:32:55.220 meant to be
00:32:56.060 interpreted.
00:32:57.140 So I can see
00:32:58.000 why you trust
00:32:58.580 them a little
00:32:58.940 bit more.
00:32:59.440 I have the
00:33:00.000 same feeling,
00:33:00.580 by the way.
00:33:02.060 Although I
00:33:02.700 don't identify
00:33:03.440 as being a
00:33:04.340 conservative,
00:33:05.920 I would buy
00:33:06.600 the argument
00:33:07.140 that the
00:33:07.640 people who
00:33:08.040 say, let's
00:33:08.660 not make up
00:33:10.480 our own
00:33:10.820 laws, let's
00:33:11.500 just interpret
00:33:12.640 the Constitution
00:33:13.420 by its
00:33:14.000 original intent,
00:33:15.280 that feels
00:33:16.280 reasonable.
00:33:17.840 You know, I
00:33:18.300 have always
00:33:18.580 respect that
00:33:19.160 point of view.
00:33:19.740 So, here's
00:33:21.980 what I
00:33:22.260 think.
00:33:23.500 Here's the
00:33:24.160 weirdest part
00:33:24.640 of the story.
00:33:27.500 Let's see,
00:33:28.020 there was
00:33:28.200 Justices Clarence
00:33:30.260 Thomas and
00:33:31.140 Samuel Alito
00:33:32.440 publicly dissented.
00:33:35.680 The votes of
00:33:36.440 the other
00:33:36.780 justices were
00:33:37.620 not disclosed.
00:33:40.480 Huh.
00:33:41.200 Does that
00:33:41.720 mean that the
00:33:42.220 argument will
00:33:42.960 not be disclosed
00:33:43.840 as well?
00:33:44.280 Well, can
00:33:45.580 somebody give
00:33:46.040 me a fact
00:33:46.480 check?
00:33:47.580 Are we
00:33:47.980 going to
00:33:48.240 see not
00:33:48.900 written
00:33:49.400 arguments from
00:33:50.820 the majority
00:33:51.720 as well as
00:33:52.300 the minority?
00:33:54.560 Or does
00:33:55.100 that come
00:33:55.400 later?
00:33:57.680 Yeah, since
00:33:58.400 when do you
00:33:58.880 not disclose
00:33:59.520 who voted
00:34:00.000 for what?
00:34:00.980 This is
00:34:01.580 really sketchy
00:34:02.320 to me.
00:34:03.480 I'm going to
00:34:04.060 speculate.
00:34:05.080 You ready?
00:34:06.560 Speculation
00:34:07.040 coming.
00:34:07.360 I believe that
00:34:09.300 the Supreme
00:34:09.900 Court has
00:34:11.900 two competing
00:34:14.780 let's say
00:34:17.420 objectives.
00:34:20.180 Objective
00:34:20.740 number one
00:34:21.340 is to
00:34:21.940 properly
00:34:22.600 interpret the
00:34:23.420 law according
00:34:24.160 to the
00:34:24.600 Constitution.
00:34:26.260 We all
00:34:26.700 agree with
00:34:27.160 that one,
00:34:27.580 right?
00:34:28.760 Right.
00:34:29.600 The other
00:34:30.000 one, well,
00:34:31.160 maybe three.
00:34:32.160 Credibility
00:34:32.700 is related to
00:34:34.420 the second
00:34:34.780 thing I'm
00:34:35.140 going to
00:34:35.260 say.
00:34:35.720 The second
00:34:36.140 thing is to
00:34:36.660 keep the
00:34:36.960 country from
00:34:37.460 being destroyed.
00:34:39.100 Now, nowhere
00:34:39.820 does it say
00:34:40.400 that's your
00:34:40.800 job.
00:34:41.900 Right.
00:34:43.000 There's
00:34:43.480 nothing that
00:34:43.940 says, as
00:34:44.700 part of the
00:34:45.260 Supreme
00:34:45.660 Court, make
00:34:46.640 sure that
00:34:46.980 your decisions
00:34:47.600 do not rip
00:34:48.420 the country
00:34:48.860 apart.
00:34:49.740 It doesn't
00:34:50.200 say that
00:34:50.580 anywhere.
00:34:52.420 But, they
00:34:54.400 are humans.
00:34:55.980 They are
00:34:56.440 humans.
00:34:57.520 They are
00:34:58.000 citizens.
00:35:00.220 They're people
00:35:01.160 who presumably
00:35:01.780 care about
00:35:02.420 their country.
00:35:03.580 Do you
00:35:03.920 think they're
00:35:04.260 going to
00:35:04.600 ignore the
00:35:06.100 impact of
00:35:07.500 their decisions
00:35:08.100 on the
00:35:08.820 whole country?
00:35:09.600 I don't
00:35:10.080 think so.
00:35:10.540 And I
00:35:11.880 think that,
00:35:13.020 as I said
00:35:13.980 yesterday, if
00:35:14.780 the Supreme
00:35:15.280 Court had
00:35:15.780 said that
00:35:16.700 this abortion
00:35:17.620 pill would
00:35:18.220 not be
00:35:18.700 available, you
00:35:19.940 could just
00:35:20.320 cancel the
00:35:20.880 elections.
00:35:22.220 Just cancel
00:35:22.780 the elections.
00:35:23.800 Just give it
00:35:24.460 to the
00:35:24.720 Democrats.
00:35:25.720 Because I
00:35:26.200 think that
00:35:26.720 this would
00:35:27.520 be like the
00:35:28.280 abortion Roe
00:35:30.060 versus Wade
00:35:30.440 decision.
00:35:31.520 This one
00:35:32.220 would just
00:35:33.020 make the
00:35:33.580 women say,
00:35:34.440 all right,
00:35:34.700 we're done.
00:35:35.440 We're done
00:35:36.020 with Republicans.
00:35:36.740 This is too
00:35:37.980 far.
00:35:39.500 So it
00:35:41.420 almost feels
00:35:42.240 as if the
00:35:43.480 Supreme
00:35:44.300 Court was
00:35:44.940 acting maybe
00:35:48.320 in the best
00:35:48.860 interest of
00:35:49.440 the integrity
00:35:49.960 of the
00:35:50.260 country.
00:35:52.880 Now, I
00:35:53.460 don't know
00:35:53.800 that, and I
00:35:55.420 don't know if
00:35:55.800 anybody would
00:35:56.300 ever say that
00:35:56.960 out loud.
00:35:57.880 Nobody would
00:35:58.520 write it down.
00:35:59.540 But it feels
00:36:00.080 like if you
00:36:01.400 had that job,
00:36:02.040 I put myself
00:36:02.660 in that
00:36:02.940 situation.
00:36:04.080 Put myself
00:36:04.880 in that
00:36:05.180 situation.
00:36:06.860 There's this
00:36:07.500 argument, and
00:36:08.440 it's a
00:36:08.780 technical one
00:36:09.660 about whether
00:36:10.140 the FDA has
00:36:11.140 some responsibility
00:36:12.980 over the pill
00:36:13.840 or something.
00:36:14.580 So it's sort
00:36:15.040 of a technical
00:36:15.920 thing.
00:36:17.340 And the
00:36:17.500 reason it got
00:36:18.500 to the
00:36:18.780 Supreme
00:36:19.040 Court is it
00:36:19.580 could go
00:36:19.900 either way.
00:36:21.460 It doesn't
00:36:22.220 get to the
00:36:22.680 Supreme
00:36:23.080 Court unless
00:36:24.700 legitimately you
00:36:25.880 could imagine,
00:36:26.600 well, that
00:36:27.600 could go
00:36:27.920 either way.
00:36:28.900 Like there's
00:36:29.320 an argument
00:36:29.740 either way.
00:36:30.500 Otherwise,
00:36:30.940 they don't
00:36:31.180 even pick it
00:36:31.620 up.
00:36:32.760 So if
00:36:33.480 there's an
00:36:33.880 argument either
00:36:34.440 way, and
00:36:36.200 you think
00:36:36.640 that one
00:36:37.900 ruling would
00:36:38.560 rip the
00:36:38.980 country apart
00:36:39.640 and just
00:36:40.060 change the
00:36:40.640 nature of
00:36:41.240 civilization,
00:36:43.240 and the
00:36:43.580 other way
00:36:43.940 would just
00:36:44.260 be business
00:36:44.780 as usual.
00:36:46.040 Because remember,
00:36:46.920 it was legal
00:36:47.620 before, and
00:36:48.920 that wasn't
00:36:49.440 ripping the
00:36:49.900 country apart.
00:36:51.280 So they're
00:36:51.700 like, one
00:36:52.480 thing will
00:36:52.880 rip the
00:36:53.260 country apart,
00:36:54.800 one will
00:36:55.360 just be
00:36:55.720 business as
00:36:56.320 usual, and
00:36:57.860 people were
00:36:58.480 already sort
00:36:59.680 of used to
00:37:00.120 having this
00:37:00.560 pill available,
00:37:01.800 like society
00:37:02.740 had adjusted
00:37:03.320 to it.
00:37:04.440 I don't
00:37:05.700 know.
00:37:07.080 Yeah, systems
00:37:07.920 versus goals,
00:37:08.820 that's exactly
00:37:09.680 it.
00:37:10.220 It could be
00:37:11.080 that the
00:37:11.820 Supreme Court
00:37:13.320 valued the
00:37:14.360 integrity of
00:37:15.000 the system
00:37:15.560 over the
00:37:17.420 decision.
00:37:19.460 Now, I
00:37:20.140 don't think
00:37:20.540 anybody would
00:37:21.020 ever say
00:37:21.400 that out
00:37:21.780 loud, even
00:37:23.380 if in their
00:37:24.660 minds they
00:37:25.140 were thinking
00:37:25.540 that.
00:37:26.340 And maybe
00:37:26.820 they didn't
00:37:27.220 think it
00:37:27.620 consciously.
00:37:28.480 It could
00:37:28.740 also be a
00:37:29.440 subconscious
00:37:29.960 instinct to
00:37:32.140 protect the
00:37:32.700 system, because
00:37:33.940 that would be
00:37:34.280 a good
00:37:34.540 instinct.
00:37:35.260 You should
00:37:35.580 all have
00:37:35.880 that instinct.
00:37:38.780 So I'm
00:37:39.660 going to
00:37:39.840 give a
00:37:40.240 tentative
00:37:40.980 thumbs up
00:37:42.380 to the
00:37:44.020 decision, and
00:37:45.820 not because
00:37:46.440 it has
00:37:46.720 anything to
00:37:47.180 do with
00:37:47.440 the pill.
00:37:48.940 That's a
00:37:49.600 separate
00:37:49.980 conversation
00:37:51.340 whether that
00:37:51.920 should be
00:37:52.220 available.
00:37:53.480 But did
00:37:54.440 the Supreme
00:37:54.980 Court make
00:37:56.720 what I call
00:37:57.260 the football
00:37:58.200 decision?
00:37:58.760 did they
00:37:59.760 make a
00:38:00.200 hard
00:38:00.500 decision
00:38:01.080 because that
00:38:02.180 was their
00:38:02.560 job, and
00:38:04.040 there's no
00:38:05.460 guide to
00:38:08.640 tell you how
00:38:09.100 to handle
00:38:09.400 that specific
00:38:10.200 situation in
00:38:11.080 this specific
00:38:11.720 case?
00:38:12.740 It feels
00:38:13.540 like they
00:38:16.580 decided to
00:38:17.660 keep the
00:38:19.140 public calm.
00:38:21.200 That's what
00:38:21.560 it feels
00:38:21.840 like.
00:38:22.680 What do
00:38:23.040 you think?
00:38:23.860 Do you
00:38:24.180 think that
00:38:24.500 was a
00:38:25.120 legitimate
00:38:25.820 just-by-the-book
00:38:27.080 decision, or
00:38:28.300 do you
00:38:28.480 think they
00:38:28.780 were looking
00:38:29.160 at the
00:38:29.440 bigger picture
00:38:29.980 of civilization
00:38:31.400 and the
00:38:33.860 integrity of
00:38:34.460 the system?
00:38:36.760 And I
00:38:37.140 don't have
00:38:37.420 any problem
00:38:37.860 if they
00:38:38.740 consider the
00:38:39.480 integrity of
00:38:40.100 the system.
00:38:41.160 Because the
00:38:41.840 reason we
00:38:42.200 have humans
00:38:42.720 as judges,
00:38:44.460 the reason we
00:38:44.900 have humans
00:38:45.440 as DAs,
00:38:47.080 and humans
00:38:48.100 as jury
00:38:49.660 trials, is
00:38:51.540 because you
00:38:52.280 want the
00:38:52.960 people to
00:38:53.740 be able to
00:38:54.400 make the
00:38:54.880 exceptions when
00:38:55.820 it makes
00:38:56.120 sense.
00:38:57.120 If they
00:38:57.580 made an
00:38:57.980 exception,
00:38:58.700 and just
00:38:58.920 sort of
00:38:59.260 if, and
00:38:59.820 this is
00:39:00.100 speculative,
00:39:00.940 if they
00:39:01.360 decided to
00:39:01.960 ignore for
00:39:02.540 a while the
00:39:03.900 constitutional
00:39:04.600 specifics and
00:39:07.020 just say,
00:39:07.660 well, I
00:39:08.480 think we
00:39:08.880 just have to
00:39:09.540 go this
00:39:09.840 way.
00:39:10.100 It just
00:39:10.280 makes more
00:39:10.680 sense.
00:39:11.680 I'd be
00:39:12.200 okay with
00:39:12.540 that.
00:39:13.620 That's why
00:39:14.140 we have
00:39:14.400 humans.
00:39:15.440 All right,
00:39:15.760 here's one
00:39:16.200 that's going
00:39:16.580 to break
00:39:17.040 your brain.
00:39:18.380 So I
00:39:18.700 asked this
00:39:19.160 question,
00:39:20.280 and I'll
00:39:21.440 tell you why
00:39:21.880 in a minute.
00:39:22.160 what, let's
00:39:25.940 see your
00:39:26.220 opinion before
00:39:26.820 I give you
00:39:27.220 the answer.
00:39:28.600 In your
00:39:29.240 opinion, what
00:39:30.960 percentage of
00:39:32.020 trans people
00:39:33.280 end up
00:39:34.360 regretting their
00:39:35.580 transition?
00:39:38.440 Look at the
00:39:39.000 numbers.
00:39:39.420 I'll just read
00:39:39.880 off some of
00:39:40.280 the numbers.
00:39:41.240 Now, remember,
00:39:42.280 none of us are
00:39:43.580 in the know,
00:39:44.340 right?
00:39:44.960 We're just
00:39:45.400 sort of
00:39:45.740 ignorantly
00:39:46.280 looking into,
00:39:47.520 unless you
00:39:48.000 are actually
00:39:48.480 trans.
00:39:48.880 If you're
00:39:50.040 not trans,
00:39:51.260 you don't
00:39:52.120 know a lot
00:39:52.640 about this
00:39:53.080 category,
00:39:53.660 right?
00:39:54.560 So I'm
00:39:54.880 seeing numbers
00:39:55.460 from 90
00:39:56.100 to 25%.
00:39:57.280 You want
00:39:58.480 to know
00:39:58.660 the real
00:39:58.920 number?
00:40:00.180 Way under
00:40:00.860 1%.
00:40:01.720 Like, way
00:40:05.180 under 1%.
00:40:06.580 Yeah.
00:40:08.820 What percentage
00:40:09.620 of people
00:40:10.120 regret just
00:40:11.740 a regular
00:40:12.180 surgery?
00:40:13.560 Just a
00:40:14.020 normal surgery?
00:40:15.180 What percent
00:40:15.700 of regret?
00:40:16.880 Maybe 5%?
00:40:17.660 Depends on
00:40:19.540 the surgery,
00:40:20.040 right?
00:40:20.800 Don't you
00:40:21.280 think a lot
00:40:21.660 of people
00:40:21.940 say, oh,
00:40:22.340 I wish I
00:40:22.680 hadn't gotten
00:40:23.000 that surgery?
00:40:24.700 Yeah.
00:40:25.240 There are a lot
00:40:25.760 of surgeries
00:40:26.200 where you
00:40:27.700 can't be sure
00:40:28.200 it's going to
00:40:28.560 work.
00:40:29.040 So a lot
00:40:29.500 of people
00:40:29.720 just end up
00:40:30.220 regretting it.
00:40:31.840 But the,
00:40:33.100 according to,
00:40:34.560 now, I know,
00:40:36.280 I know, I know,
00:40:38.000 I know what
00:40:38.500 you're thinking.
00:40:39.620 You're thinking
00:40:40.360 my way less
00:40:41.360 than 1% number
00:40:42.420 is complete
00:40:42.940 bullshit,
00:40:43.440 right?
00:40:44.320 Is that what
00:40:44.760 you're thinking?
00:40:45.460 Say it.
00:40:46.620 Say it.
00:40:47.660 You think
00:40:48.220 that number
00:40:48.680 is complete
00:40:49.460 bullshit.
00:40:50.680 Now, all I
00:40:51.640 know is the
00:40:52.360 source, right?
00:40:53.780 All I know
00:40:54.300 is the
00:40:54.580 source.
00:40:55.320 The source
00:40:55.980 is Google.
00:40:58.420 Google's,
00:40:59.080 where Google
00:40:59.620 summarizes,
00:41:00.640 you know,
00:41:00.920 the most
00:41:01.600 asked questions
00:41:02.380 when you
00:41:02.760 search.
00:41:03.900 That's one
00:41:04.560 of the most
00:41:04.940 asked questions.
00:41:06.540 And their
00:41:07.040 answer,
00:41:07.860 authoritatively,
00:41:09.420 with no
00:41:10.260 waffling,
00:41:12.160 is that there
00:41:12.900 was, I don't
00:41:13.620 know,
00:41:13.740 some study
00:41:14.320 and it came
00:41:14.780 up with way
00:41:15.280 less than
00:41:15.600 1%.
00:41:16.100 Now, I'm
00:41:18.020 going to fool
00:41:18.460 you by agreeing
00:41:19.320 with that
00:41:19.720 number.
00:41:21.520 But you
00:41:21.860 didn't see
00:41:22.180 that coming,
00:41:22.700 did you?
00:41:23.360 I agree
00:41:23.800 with that
00:41:24.100 number.
00:41:24.920 Do you
00:41:25.140 know why?
00:41:26.800 Everything I
00:41:27.500 know about
00:41:27.900 everything suggests
00:41:28.780 it should be
00:41:29.240 about that.
00:41:30.240 It should be
00:41:30.540 under 1%.
00:41:31.460 Ask me why.
00:41:33.740 Do you
00:41:33.960 know why?
00:41:36.400 Because it's
00:41:37.020 not like other
00:41:37.680 surgeries.
00:41:39.340 When you're
00:41:39.960 getting a knee
00:41:40.880 surgery,
00:41:42.220 it's just,
00:41:42.980 you're just
00:41:43.360 looking at
00:41:43.840 costs and
00:41:44.400 benefits and
00:41:44.980 you're taking
00:41:45.320 a gas and
00:41:45.960 if it doesn't
00:41:46.920 go well,
00:41:47.340 you're going
00:41:47.600 to complain
00:41:48.040 forever.
00:41:48.900 Right?
00:41:49.560 But if you
00:41:50.140 make a decision
00:41:50.860 so fundamental
00:41:52.320 to yourself,
00:41:54.020 like your
00:41:54.460 identity,
00:41:55.540 it's not
00:41:55.880 your knee,
00:41:57.240 it's you.
00:41:58.480 It's like
00:41:58.880 your very
00:41:59.880 existence on
00:42:00.860 this planet
00:42:01.420 is being
00:42:02.560 redefined.
00:42:03.360 It's not a
00:42:03.840 bad knee.
00:42:05.420 If you
00:42:06.040 define your
00:42:07.200 entire existence
00:42:08.260 so much so
00:42:09.940 that you've
00:42:10.820 done some
00:42:11.220 medical procedure
00:42:12.420 to achieve
00:42:13.380 it,
00:42:14.060 the odds
00:42:15.020 are that
00:42:16.880 your brain
00:42:17.360 will tell
00:42:17.740 you you
00:42:18.040 made the
00:42:18.380 right decision.
00:42:19.780 Why?
00:42:20.560 Because that's
00:42:20.940 how brains
00:42:21.320 work.
00:42:22.380 That's how
00:42:22.760 brains work.
00:42:23.780 If you do
00:42:24.360 something that
00:42:24.940 radical,
00:42:26.460 you do not
00:42:27.180 imagine you
00:42:28.180 made a mistake
00:42:29.080 later,
00:42:30.000 even if you
00:42:30.540 did.
00:42:31.600 And I'm not
00:42:32.120 saying they
00:42:32.500 did.
00:42:32.920 I don't know,
00:42:33.520 one way or
00:42:34.020 the other.
00:42:34.680 I'm just
00:42:35.240 saying that
00:42:36.400 I would
00:42:36.900 expect a
00:42:38.780 very,
00:42:39.400 very low
00:42:39.840 rate of
00:42:40.260 regret.
00:42:40.720 And I
00:42:42.880 would expect
00:42:43.380 that because
00:42:44.140 the decision
00:42:44.920 is so
00:42:45.460 big,
00:42:46.500 that's what
00:42:47.060 causes
00:42:47.420 cognitive
00:42:47.940 dissonance.
00:42:48.920 A small
00:42:49.560 trivial decision
00:42:50.540 that you
00:42:50.840 get wrong,
00:42:51.940 you'll easily
00:42:52.580 say,
00:42:52.920 oh,
00:42:53.020 I fucked
00:42:53.320 that up.
00:42:54.060 Right?
00:42:54.580 If you
00:42:55.180 take a
00:42:55.540 wrong route
00:42:56.140 to a
00:42:56.840 destination
00:42:57.380 and it
00:42:58.320 makes you
00:42:58.680 late,
00:42:59.980 you usually
00:43:00.540 blame yourself
00:43:01.340 because it's
00:43:02.740 like a trivial
00:43:03.440 decision.
00:43:04.100 I'm an
00:43:04.780 idiot.
00:43:05.260 Why did
00:43:05.540 I do
00:43:05.740 that?
00:43:05.980 But if
00:43:06.700 you make
00:43:07.020 a big
00:43:07.720 decision,
00:43:09.320 like a
00:43:09.740 really big
00:43:10.380 decision,
00:43:11.560 you'll end
00:43:12.460 up telling
00:43:12.840 yourself it
00:43:13.360 was the
00:43:13.600 right decision,
00:43:14.660 no matter
00:43:15.480 what.
00:43:16.260 Now,
00:43:16.500 here's the
00:43:16.780 real question.
00:43:17.380 Are some
00:43:17.700 of you
00:43:17.920 saying,
00:43:18.540 yes,
00:43:18.920 but you're
00:43:19.240 wrong?
00:43:20.400 Like,
00:43:20.860 really,
00:43:21.180 it was a
00:43:21.500 bad decision,
00:43:22.860 but in
00:43:23.260 your mind
00:43:23.700 you think
00:43:24.040 it's right,
00:43:24.820 so you're
00:43:25.220 wrong about
00:43:25.600 that.
00:43:26.680 No,
00:43:26.960 you're not.
00:43:28.740 If you
00:43:29.360 think you're
00:43:29.860 happy,
00:43:30.200 you're happy.
00:43:31.360 End of
00:43:31.800 story.
00:43:33.200 Right?
00:43:33.540 It's not up
00:43:34.180 to me to
00:43:34.640 tell you you're
00:43:35.140 not happy.
00:43:35.580 If you
00:43:35.900 think you're
00:43:36.340 happy,
00:43:37.020 if you
00:43:37.720 think you
00:43:38.100 made the
00:43:38.400 right choice,
00:43:38.960 that has
00:43:39.680 nothing to
00:43:40.080 do with
00:43:40.300 me.
00:43:40.720 I'm out.
00:43:41.500 I have
00:43:41.900 nothing to
00:43:42.340 do with
00:43:42.600 that.
00:43:43.340 If you
00:43:43.820 think it's
00:43:44.220 the right
00:43:44.520 choice,
00:43:45.620 that's the
00:43:46.420 right choice.
00:43:47.780 That made
00:43:48.560 you happy.
00:43:49.840 Now,
00:43:50.160 I'd like to
00:43:50.480 add one
00:43:50.900 other thing
00:43:51.400 to support
00:43:54.720 the trans
00:43:55.640 community,
00:43:56.680 because I'm
00:43:57.180 a big
00:43:57.520 supporter.
00:43:58.840 It goes
00:43:59.360 like this.
00:44:00.680 I think
00:44:01.420 we all
00:44:02.080 necessarily
00:44:03.140 look at
00:44:03.740 the trans
00:44:04.220 situation
00:44:04.760 through
00:44:06.000 our own
00:44:06.840 filter
00:44:07.320 of our
00:44:07.900 own
00:44:08.080 experience.
00:44:09.420 If you
00:44:10.060 have never
00:44:10.520 experienced
00:44:11.240 whatever this
00:44:12.360 gender dysmorphia
00:44:14.160 thing is,
00:44:14.900 I've never
00:44:15.360 experienced it.
00:44:16.280 I've never
00:44:16.660 had a whiff
00:44:17.200 of it.
00:44:17.560 I have no
00:44:17.960 idea what
00:44:18.360 that's about.
00:44:19.520 If you've
00:44:20.200 never experienced
00:44:20.980 it,
00:44:21.760 you have no
00:44:22.640 idea.
00:44:24.460 And I'm not
00:44:25.280 sure you should
00:44:25.740 ever have an
00:44:26.200 opinion on it.
00:44:27.560 That was
00:44:27.900 somebody else's
00:44:28.560 transition.
00:44:29.740 Now,
00:44:30.000 we're talking
00:44:30.320 adults.
00:44:31.200 Remember,
00:44:32.180 just adults.
00:44:32.900 kids are
00:44:33.880 a different
00:44:34.200 topic.
00:44:35.440 But for
00:44:36.600 adults,
00:44:37.820 do you
00:44:38.180 really think
00:44:38.860 you can
00:44:39.220 understand how
00:44:39.980 it feels?
00:44:41.780 These are
00:44:42.560 people who
00:44:43.180 are physically
00:44:44.840 altering
00:44:45.640 themselves
00:44:47.180 permanently,
00:44:49.180 I guess,
00:44:49.800 or semi-permanently,
00:44:50.880 depending on what
00:44:51.480 they're doing.
00:44:52.360 And that's a
00:44:54.220 big,
00:44:54.700 big,
00:44:55.080 big decision.
00:44:56.840 You don't
00:44:57.660 think that
00:44:58.700 there's something
00:44:59.180 going on in
00:44:59.800 their head
00:45:00.140 that is so
00:45:01.980 brutal that
00:45:04.160 such a,
00:45:05.540 I'd call it a
00:45:06.160 fairly radical
00:45:06.980 decision,
00:45:08.000 makes sense.
00:45:10.320 You cannot
00:45:11.140 understand how
00:45:12.520 they feel.
00:45:13.400 You cannot.
00:45:14.440 And if you
00:45:14.820 don't understand
00:45:15.440 how they feel,
00:45:17.100 then you can't
00:45:18.120 be a participant
00:45:19.000 even to judge
00:45:20.600 if they made
00:45:21.220 the right decision.
00:45:22.420 Let me give you
00:45:23.180 an example.
00:45:24.140 Have you ever
00:45:24.620 done something
00:45:25.180 in your life
00:45:25.880 that you knew
00:45:26.720 was the wrong
00:45:27.360 decision,
00:45:28.660 and you were
00:45:29.100 going to do it
00:45:29.580 anyway,
00:45:30.100 because it's
00:45:30.460 just how you
00:45:30.920 felt?
00:45:33.780 Sometimes you
00:45:34.480 just feel
00:45:35.280 so strongly
00:45:36.980 about something
00:45:37.780 that I don't
00:45:39.280 want to hear
00:45:39.660 anybody's argument,
00:45:40.640 I don't care
00:45:41.080 how good it is.
00:45:42.320 Don't tell me
00:45:42.860 how good your
00:45:43.460 argument is,
00:45:44.060 sometimes you
00:45:44.480 just need to
00:45:44.980 punch somebody.
00:45:46.240 Yeah, I know
00:45:46.680 I'm going to
00:45:47.000 go to jail,
00:45:47.640 I'm going to
00:45:47.900 do it anyway.
00:45:49.380 So the
00:45:50.780 feelings that
00:45:52.400 people have
00:45:52.820 are part of
00:45:53.220 the decision.
00:45:54.640 If you don't
00:45:55.280 know how people
00:45:55.760 feel,
00:45:57.460 and that's the
00:45:58.100 biggest part
00:45:58.620 of the decision,
00:45:59.980 then don't
00:46:00.540 second guess
00:46:01.260 whether they'd
00:46:01.740 be happy about
00:46:02.380 it, because
00:46:03.620 that would be
00:46:04.100 kind of crazy.
00:46:06.760 So that's
00:46:08.040 my, I
00:46:09.020 wanted you
00:46:09.360 to hear this.
00:46:10.000 So I
00:46:10.420 heard this
00:46:10.920 yesterday on
00:46:11.740 CNN, Jake
00:46:12.660 Tapper was
00:46:13.420 interviewing, I
00:46:15.300 think a
00:46:15.600 Montana
00:46:16.320 legislation, or
00:46:18.220 a legislator
00:46:19.720 from Montana,
00:46:20.560 where there
00:46:20.860 was some
00:46:21.160 anti-trans
00:46:21.960 law going
00:46:22.500 on, and
00:46:23.400 the trans
00:46:24.100 government
00:46:27.820 person, I
00:46:28.780 forget what
00:46:29.460 job she
00:46:30.080 has, explained
00:46:32.380 that their
00:46:32.900 regret level
00:46:33.980 was less
00:46:34.580 than 1%, and
00:46:36.120 then did what
00:46:36.920 I did, which
00:46:37.500 was I borrowed
00:46:38.080 this, compared
00:46:39.440 it to surgeries
00:46:40.380 in general.
00:46:41.920 People have, like
00:46:42.900 back surgery was
00:46:43.740 a good example,
00:46:44.700 people have
00:46:45.200 back surgery,
00:46:46.740 sometimes,
00:46:48.700 afterwards they
00:46:49.520 go, well that
00:46:49.880 was a bad
00:46:50.240 idea, just
00:46:50.800 made it worse.
00:46:52.540 And probably
00:46:53.320 more often than
00:46:54.140 trans, if you
00:46:56.760 believe this
00:46:57.240 surgery.
00:46:58.020 Now, now
00:46:59.400 that I've
00:47:00.220 gone hard in
00:47:00.980 one direction,
00:47:02.900 let me give a
00:47:03.760 little bit of
00:47:04.180 support to some
00:47:05.080 of you who are
00:47:05.600 thinking this
00:47:06.140 right now.
00:47:07.700 Doesn't it seem
00:47:08.380 like there's a
00:47:08.860 lot more
00:47:09.240 transitioning
00:47:10.000 recently?
00:47:12.860 Wouldn't you
00:47:13.480 assume that
00:47:15.360 any major
00:47:16.800 increase in
00:47:17.680 the number of
00:47:18.360 people are
00:47:18.740 transitioning
00:47:19.260 would necessarily
00:47:20.960 pick up people
00:47:22.580 who are a
00:47:23.020 little closer
00:47:23.520 to being on
00:47:24.020 the fence?
00:47:25.960 Presumably.
00:47:26.960 I mean, just
00:47:27.340 the math would
00:47:28.620 suggest that
00:47:29.400 you're picking up
00:47:29.960 more people who
00:47:30.700 would not have,
00:47:31.660 maybe wouldn't
00:47:32.320 have made the
00:47:32.760 change.
00:47:33.680 Now, I can't
00:47:34.640 say for sure
00:47:35.320 that that's bad
00:47:37.220 or good.
00:47:38.780 In other words,
00:47:39.980 maybe those
00:47:40.860 extra people are
00:47:41.780 also happy in
00:47:42.680 the end.
00:47:43.480 They might say,
00:47:44.020 well, I'm glad
00:47:44.420 I did this.
00:47:45.040 I don't know.
00:47:45.880 I mean, I was
00:47:46.300 surprised at the
00:47:46.980 under 1%.
00:47:47.880 If you were
00:47:48.920 surprised at the
00:47:49.620 under 1%,
00:47:50.640 then you should
00:47:52.660 at least,
00:47:53.300 here's all I'll
00:47:54.060 ask you.
00:47:54.960 I'll just ask
00:47:55.580 you this.
00:47:57.720 Just acknowledge
00:47:59.000 that if you
00:48:00.300 didn't know that
00:48:01.020 the official number,
00:48:02.200 whether it's true
00:48:02.740 or not,
00:48:03.620 whether it's true
00:48:04.180 or not,
00:48:04.480 we'll talk about.
00:48:05.400 But if you
00:48:05.800 didn't know that
00:48:06.300 the official number
00:48:07.080 is way less
00:48:08.040 than 1% regret,
00:48:10.800 does it feel
00:48:11.880 weird that you
00:48:12.460 were,
00:48:13.800 you had a
00:48:14.300 strong opinion?
00:48:14.940 Now, again,
00:48:17.440 not about kids.
00:48:18.740 Kids are a
00:48:19.180 different topic.
00:48:20.180 But for adults,
00:48:22.080 a lot of people
00:48:22.800 say no.
00:48:23.620 All right, so let's
00:48:24.120 talk the counter
00:48:24.720 argument.
00:48:25.580 The counter
00:48:25.980 argument goes
00:48:26.620 like this.
00:48:29.620 We believe that
00:48:30.960 your real problem
00:48:31.820 is psychological
00:48:32.920 or mental,
00:48:34.580 and so we
00:48:35.500 should work as
00:48:36.460 hard as we can
00:48:37.060 to fix that
00:48:37.700 part.
00:48:38.500 And if we
00:48:39.240 can, if that's
00:48:40.580 fixable,
00:48:41.780 and I hate to
00:48:42.580 use fixable,
00:48:43.240 because that's
00:48:44.140 insulting to
00:48:44.800 trans.
00:48:46.060 If you say
00:48:47.100 that the
00:48:47.420 trans can be
00:48:48.120 fixed, I
00:48:50.500 legitimately feel
00:48:51.420 that's an
00:48:51.780 insult.
00:48:52.780 That's like
00:48:53.180 saying gay
00:48:53.680 people can be
00:48:54.300 fixed.
00:48:55.060 That genuinely
00:48:55.900 feels like just
00:48:56.840 an insult to
00:48:57.740 me.
00:48:58.760 So be careful
00:48:59.960 about how you
00:49:00.520 word these
00:49:00.920 things, because
00:49:01.600 there's sort
00:49:02.300 of some traps
00:49:02.820 here.
00:49:03.840 But I would
00:49:06.120 agree with you
00:49:06.920 that there has
00:49:09.220 to be at this
00:49:09.860 point some
00:49:10.920 percent, I
00:49:11.860 don't know how
00:49:12.200 big or small
00:49:12.740 it is, probably
00:49:13.480 small, of
00:49:14.820 people who are
00:49:15.560 just being
00:49:16.000 caught up in
00:49:16.620 the persuasion
00:49:17.260 of it, and
00:49:18.600 that those
00:49:19.000 people are far
00:49:20.100 more likely to
00:49:20.880 regret it than
00:49:22.060 the people who
00:49:22.540 have genuinely
00:49:23.460 something deep
00:49:24.980 inside their
00:49:26.300 minds that
00:49:26.900 needs to be
00:49:27.380 addressed, you
00:49:28.500 know, in
00:49:28.660 terms of their
00:49:29.140 dysmorphia or
00:49:29.960 whatever.
00:49:30.920 So I would
00:49:32.700 guess that the
00:49:33.540 way under one
00:49:34.440 percent number
00:49:35.060 will increase.
00:49:36.500 Would you
00:49:36.880 agree with
00:49:37.240 that?
00:49:38.400 That the
00:49:38.960 trend, just
00:49:40.040 because it's
00:49:41.220 more accepted,
00:49:42.540 you're going
00:49:42.900 to get more
00:49:43.360 people who
00:49:43.900 are not as
00:49:45.200 committed to
00:49:45.820 the change, but
00:49:46.980 still do it,
00:49:48.560 just not as
00:49:49.200 committed to
00:49:49.700 it.
00:49:50.500 In theory, the
00:49:51.440 ones who are
00:49:51.800 not as
00:49:52.600 committed are
00:49:54.240 going to maybe
00:49:55.620 have more
00:49:56.080 regret, but
00:49:57.440 what if it
00:49:57.880 doubles?
00:49:59.320 If it
00:49:59.920 doubles, it
00:50:00.420 only goes to
00:50:00.960 two percent,
00:50:01.960 actually way
00:50:02.480 less than
00:50:02.840 two percent.
00:50:03.640 It would be
00:50:03.900 like 1.3 or
00:50:06.420 something, if
00:50:08.640 it doubled.
00:50:10.620 So there's
00:50:11.580 plenty of
00:50:12.080 room for it
00:50:13.460 to get worse
00:50:14.180 before it
00:50:14.880 would change
00:50:15.500 the fact that
00:50:16.380 it needs to
00:50:17.480 be an option
00:50:17.980 for some
00:50:18.480 people.
00:50:21.300 Yeah.
00:50:21.900 And then
00:50:22.500 the more
00:50:25.340 basic question,
00:50:26.800 is the less
00:50:28.720 than one
00:50:29.280 percent accurate?
00:50:32.200 And then
00:50:32.640 somebody asked
00:50:33.260 this terrible
00:50:33.800 question.
00:50:34.820 This is a
00:50:35.380 horrible
00:50:35.620 question.
00:50:36.740 I hate
00:50:37.560 myself for
00:50:38.100 asking the
00:50:38.560 question, but
00:50:39.800 it feels
00:50:40.220 relevant.
00:50:41.780 Did they
00:50:42.220 count the
00:50:42.600 people who
00:50:42.980 killed
00:50:43.160 themselves?
00:50:45.540 Because they
00:50:46.320 would maybe
00:50:47.700 be in the
00:50:49.560 category of
00:50:50.160 people who
00:50:50.520 regretted it.
00:50:51.640 But I
00:50:52.060 would think
00:50:52.740 more likely
00:50:53.420 if they took
00:50:55.220 their lives
00:50:55.720 because there
00:50:56.260 was something
00:50:56.740 in general
00:50:59.180 that was
00:50:59.840 bothering them
00:51:00.420 even before
00:51:01.020 they transitioned.
00:51:02.700 So probably
00:51:03.600 the self
00:51:05.280 harm is
00:51:06.900 related to
00:51:07.940 the person
00:51:09.560 overall and
00:51:10.320 maybe not
00:51:10.780 just the
00:51:11.460 gender part.
00:51:13.200 No way to
00:51:13.980 know.
00:51:15.140 But I'll
00:51:15.800 give you
00:51:16.100 this.
00:51:16.920 I don't
00:51:17.380 believe the
00:51:18.140 under one
00:51:18.920 percent number
00:51:19.680 is accurate.
00:51:22.300 Do you feel
00:51:22.960 more comfortable
00:51:23.480 with that?
00:51:24.200 I don't believe
00:51:25.040 that number is
00:51:25.520 accurate.
00:51:26.660 I think it's
00:51:27.280 more because
00:51:29.300 data is really
00:51:30.160 hard to get.
00:51:31.600 Almost every
00:51:32.300 study we look
00:51:33.320 at is
00:51:33.740 sketchy.
00:51:35.000 50% of
00:51:35.960 all studies
00:51:37.220 end up not
00:51:38.080 being reproducible.
00:51:39.900 So I
00:51:41.180 wouldn't be
00:51:41.640 surprised if
00:51:42.320 it's higher,
00:51:43.360 but your
00:51:44.060 estimates of
00:51:45.060 25% and
00:51:46.360 40%, those
00:51:47.360 seem crazy to
00:51:48.200 me.
00:51:49.100 If it were
00:51:49.580 25%, it's
00:51:50.740 all you'd
00:51:51.080 hear about.
00:51:52.860 I mean,
00:51:54.200 I do see
00:51:55.120 some reporters
00:51:56.200 have found
00:51:56.940 like a few
00:51:58.200 dozen people
00:51:59.020 who were
00:52:00.140 trying to
00:52:00.560 detransition,
00:52:02.440 but NFO
00:52:03.180 many, right?
00:52:05.400 If 25% of
00:52:07.100 trans regretted
00:52:08.060 it, it's
00:52:09.320 all you'd
00:52:09.980 see.
00:52:10.660 It would
00:52:10.920 just be all
00:52:11.520 over the
00:52:11.860 news.
00:52:12.640 That's a
00:52:13.040 lot of
00:52:14.020 people who
00:52:14.480 would be
00:52:14.700 self-harming,
00:52:16.020 and I
00:52:17.060 don't see
00:52:17.440 it.
00:52:18.860 So there's
00:52:19.720 something that
00:52:20.100 tells me it's
00:52:20.580 under 10%.
00:52:21.640 I can easily
00:52:23.360 believe it's
00:52:23.920 under 5%,
00:52:24.760 and if it's
00:52:25.940 under 5%,
00:52:26.640 that looks to
00:52:27.460 me like
00:52:27.760 personal choice.
00:52:29.020 I did a
00:52:31.100 surgery for
00:52:32.200 my voice.
00:52:33.240 I told you
00:52:33.720 this story.
00:52:34.820 So when I
00:52:35.420 had the
00:52:35.880 option of
00:52:36.340 fixing my
00:52:36.860 voice, I
00:52:37.280 couldn't speak
00:52:37.800 for 3.5
00:52:38.440 years, at
00:52:39.260 least intelligibly,
00:52:40.740 and I had
00:52:41.540 to have a
00:52:41.980 surgery.
00:52:42.540 It was a
00:52:43.060 new surgery.
00:52:46.300 Now, I got
00:52:47.060 these odds.
00:52:48.300 There was
00:52:48.580 75% chance
00:52:49.820 I'd be happy
00:52:50.360 I got the
00:52:50.860 surgery, and
00:52:52.100 a 25%
00:52:53.020 chance, maybe
00:52:54.220 lower, that
00:52:56.700 it would make
00:52:57.680 it worse,
00:52:58.220 worse, and
00:52:59.220 it would
00:52:59.680 make it
00:53:00.040 impossible to
00:53:00.800 fix in the
00:53:01.260 future, if
00:53:02.440 ever there
00:53:02.860 was a way
00:53:03.180 to fix it
00:53:03.640 in the
00:53:03.840 future.
00:53:04.920 That was
00:53:05.500 a big
00:53:05.800 risk.
00:53:07.040 If my
00:53:07.680 voice had
00:53:08.180 not returned,
00:53:09.440 I would
00:53:10.240 have a lot
00:53:10.980 of regret
00:53:11.380 about that
00:53:12.000 surgery, a
00:53:13.420 lot of
00:53:13.760 regret.
00:53:15.940 And likewise,
00:53:16.860 there are
00:53:16.980 people who
00:53:17.280 got the
00:53:17.600 vaccination, and
00:53:18.700 they have
00:53:18.960 regrets.
00:53:20.280 It's very
00:53:20.680 common to
00:53:21.760 get a
00:53:22.000 medical
00:53:22.300 procedure and
00:53:23.260 have a
00:53:23.500 regret.
00:53:23.760 So I'm
00:53:26.420 a little
00:53:26.840 amazed that
00:53:28.460 trans would
00:53:29.440 be so much
00:53:31.560 less than
00:53:32.700 people's regret
00:53:33.660 for just
00:53:34.400 almost any
00:53:35.160 other medical
00:53:35.680 procedure.
00:53:36.160 So I just
00:53:44.540 thought I'd
00:53:44.880 give the
00:53:45.360 trans community
00:53:46.980 a little
00:53:47.420 support there
00:53:48.280 by making
00:53:48.980 sure you
00:53:49.380 heard their
00:53:49.800 best arguments.
00:53:53.160 Is that
00:53:53.840 useful?
00:53:55.160 Is that
00:53:55.520 useful to
00:53:55.960 you?
00:53:56.480 Because I
00:53:57.040 feel like I
00:53:57.920 was not
00:53:58.340 hearing the
00:53:58.900 best argument
00:53:59.640 from the
00:54:00.400 trans community,
00:54:01.160 because I
00:54:01.640 didn't know
00:54:01.900 about that
00:54:02.240 1% thing.
00:54:04.300 And again,
00:54:04.920 you can doubt
00:54:05.680 it, but it's
00:54:06.400 certainly in
00:54:07.200 the area of
00:54:08.980 personal choice.
00:54:10.560 It doesn't
00:54:11.120 look like it's
00:54:11.620 so big that
00:54:12.300 the law should
00:54:13.300 be against it
00:54:13.920 or something.
00:54:18.120 All right.
00:54:19.780 Who did
00:54:20.440 the study?
00:54:21.280 Yeah, we
00:54:21.640 can question
00:54:22.520 the study.
00:54:24.360 That would
00:54:24.940 be fair.
00:54:25.440 We question
00:54:25.860 all data.
00:54:27.320 All right.
00:54:27.800 I just
00:54:28.160 thought I'd
00:54:28.500 add that
00:54:28.880 little bit
00:54:29.300 of positivity
00:54:29.920 to the
00:54:30.340 world.
00:54:31.160 I know
00:54:33.600 sometimes it's
00:54:34.240 hard to tell
00:54:35.680 if I'm
00:54:36.000 trying to
00:54:36.400 help.
00:54:38.160 I actually
00:54:38.920 am trying
00:54:39.520 to help
00:54:39.940 the BLM
00:54:41.320 people.
00:54:42.340 I actually
00:54:42.900 am trying
00:54:43.340 to help
00:54:43.680 black America.
00:54:44.920 If it
00:54:45.520 doesn't look
00:54:46.040 like it,
00:54:47.180 well,
00:54:47.840 I got
00:54:50.320 your attention.
00:54:51.460 It was
00:54:52.020 supposed to
00:54:52.440 look like I
00:54:52.920 was getting
00:54:53.240 your attention.
00:54:54.560 So if
00:54:55.140 you give
00:54:55.500 me that,
00:54:56.940 that I
00:54:57.300 got your
00:54:57.700 attention,
00:54:58.980 that's what
00:55:00.500 I was trying
00:55:00.820 to do.
00:55:05.660 Yeah.
00:55:08.580 All right.
00:55:10.920 Increased
00:55:11.420 transitioning is
00:55:12.300 part of a
00:55:12.720 PSYOP,
00:55:13.220 you say.
00:55:15.160 Yeah, I
00:55:15.800 don't know
00:55:16.040 about that.
00:55:16.780 I'll tell
00:55:17.300 you what I
00:55:17.780 never believe.
00:55:19.960 I don't
00:55:20.360 believe anybody
00:55:21.100 who says
00:55:21.680 they in
00:55:23.540 politics.
00:55:25.060 As soon
00:55:25.540 as you
00:55:25.720 heard that
00:55:26.100 word,
00:55:26.640 they,
00:55:26.860 just take
00:55:29.020 yourself out
00:55:29.520 of the
00:55:29.680 conversation.
00:55:30.600 It goes
00:55:30.980 like this.
00:55:31.980 They want
00:55:32.860 us to do
00:55:34.480 this, or
00:55:35.020 they want
00:55:35.760 us to
00:55:36.040 eat bugs.
00:55:37.540 They want
00:55:38.340 us to
00:55:39.340 not have
00:55:41.660 privacy.
00:55:43.120 There is
00:55:43.820 no they.
00:55:45.120 There is
00:55:45.620 no they.
00:55:46.020 There are
00:55:47.780 lots of
00:55:48.300 individuals
00:55:48.800 with
00:55:49.260 different
00:55:49.820 agendas,
00:55:52.080 but there's
00:55:52.720 no they.
00:55:55.120 The
00:55:55.600 elitists.
00:55:56.140 There's no
00:55:56.960 the elitists.
00:55:59.380 There's no
00:56:00.320 Illuminati.
00:56:03.440 There's no
00:56:04.000 elites.
00:56:05.180 Elites exist,
00:56:06.380 but they don't
00:56:06.880 exist with one
00:56:07.880 opinion.
00:56:09.560 You think the
00:56:10.160 elites have one
00:56:10.800 opinion?
00:56:12.700 I've met the
00:56:13.580 elites.
00:56:14.220 They don't have
00:56:14.620 the same
00:56:14.920 opinions.
00:56:16.320 There's
00:56:16.880 nobody getting
00:56:17.400 in a room
00:56:17.860 and making
00:56:18.220 these decisions
00:56:19.160 behind closed
00:56:19.960 doors.
00:56:20.760 It's not
00:56:21.100 happening.
00:56:22.900 Yeah,
00:56:23.180 Bilderberg,
00:56:24.200 blah, blah.
00:56:25.140 I've told you
00:56:25.960 this before,
00:56:26.500 but it's worth
00:56:26.920 repeating,
00:56:27.820 that the
00:56:28.380 World Economic
00:56:29.120 Forum,
00:56:30.020 if you see
00:56:30.640 it as this
00:56:31.900 global elites
00:56:32.900 who are
00:56:33.820 forming sort
00:56:35.440 of a second
00:56:36.240 government,
00:56:37.760 that's how
00:56:38.440 people see
00:56:38.880 it.
00:56:39.840 I saw an
00:56:40.720 article that
00:56:41.360 took the
00:56:41.800 opposite approach,
00:56:43.520 that literally
00:56:44.540 none of the
00:56:45.100 elites take
00:56:45.620 it seriously,
00:56:46.680 but they
00:56:46.940 have to go
00:56:47.360 bow to it
00:56:47.960 because it
00:56:48.320 looks good.
00:56:49.620 And they
00:56:49.900 get a nice
00:56:50.300 vacation in a
00:56:51.480 nice place.
00:56:52.480 It's basically
00:56:53.020 just the look
00:56:53.580 good, it's
00:56:53.820 just the
00:56:54.100 performance.
00:56:55.280 And the
00:56:55.620 people who
00:56:56.500 attend are
00:56:56.980 not terribly
00:56:57.540 serious about
00:56:58.180 any of it.
00:56:58.560 good.
00:56:58.840 And I think
00:57:00.080 that makes
00:57:01.140 far more
00:57:01.840 sense in
00:57:03.320 my Dilbert
00:57:04.360 filter of
00:57:04.980 the world,
00:57:05.780 that people
00:57:06.220 are just
00:57:06.540 trying to
00:57:06.900 look good,
00:57:07.540 they're not
00:57:07.880 really.
00:57:09.320 In the
00:57:09.820 corporate
00:57:10.120 world,
00:57:11.920 signaling and
00:57:12.720 looking good
00:57:13.240 is the
00:57:13.500 whole game.
00:57:14.440 That's the
00:57:14.780 whole game.
00:57:15.640 You don't
00:57:16.000 get promoted
00:57:16.540 because you
00:57:17.020 did good
00:57:17.400 work.
00:57:18.540 You know
00:57:18.860 that,
00:57:19.180 right?
00:57:20.200 Nobody
00:57:20.680 ever got
00:57:21.200 promoted for
00:57:21.780 doing good
00:57:22.260 work.
00:57:23.040 That's not
00:57:23.660 even a thing.
00:57:24.880 No,
00:57:25.220 you got promoted
00:57:25.880 because your
00:57:26.440 boss thought
00:57:27.320 you did
00:57:27.720 good work.
00:57:28.600 Or your
00:57:29.120 boss was
00:57:29.580 related.
00:57:30.240 Or your
00:57:30.440 boss was
00:57:30.840 sleeping with
00:57:31.460 you.
00:57:31.620 Or your
00:57:31.840 boss wanted
00:57:32.380 to sleep
00:57:32.800 with you.
00:57:33.580 Or they
00:57:34.980 thought you
00:57:35.380 would do
00:57:35.780 good work
00:57:36.220 in the
00:57:36.460 future.
00:57:37.380 No,
00:57:37.640 you don't
00:57:37.880 get promoted
00:57:38.380 for doing
00:57:38.800 good work.
00:57:41.660 However,
00:57:42.880 doing good
00:57:43.540 work is your
00:57:44.180 very best
00:57:44.640 strategy.
00:57:46.260 It's still
00:57:46.840 your best
00:57:47.140 strategy to
00:57:47.880 do good
00:57:48.220 work.
00:57:48.840 But it's
00:57:49.140 not why
00:57:49.900 you get
00:57:50.280 promoted.
00:57:50.780 There's
00:57:50.960 lots of
00:57:51.360 reasons for
00:57:51.800 that.
00:57:53.600 It does
00:57:54.240 help,
00:57:54.520 though.
00:57:55.880 Why
00:57:58.120 there's
00:57:58.340 so many
00:57:58.700 high-ranking
00:57:59.460 government
00:57:59.740 officials and
00:58:00.500 members of
00:58:00.920 the WF?
00:58:01.460 I just
00:58:01.720 told you.
00:58:03.120 People
00:58:03.680 are joining
00:58:04.720 to signal
00:58:08.040 that there
00:58:09.060 are good
00:58:09.340 people who
00:58:09.880 believe in
00:58:10.260 the environment
00:58:10.840 and equality.
00:58:12.900 And that
00:58:13.360 became the
00:58:14.400 badge that
00:58:15.340 you wear.
00:58:16.140 Why do
00:58:16.820 people wear
00:58:17.580 little pins
00:58:18.880 on their
00:58:19.260 lapel that
00:58:20.780 support a
00:58:21.540 cause?
00:58:22.920 It's because
00:58:23.560 it's the least
00:58:24.120 they can do.
00:58:25.880 It's the least
00:58:26.900 they can do.
00:58:28.020 Hey, if you
00:58:29.100 put on this
00:58:29.580 little pin
00:58:30.080 that says
00:58:30.580 Black Lives
00:58:31.120 Matter,
00:58:32.360 would you
00:58:32.760 do that?
00:58:34.120 And then
00:58:34.520 the elite
00:58:34.900 says, yeah,
00:58:36.120 it's the least
00:58:36.600 I can do.
00:58:37.640 Literally,
00:58:38.220 it's the least
00:58:38.560 you can do.
00:58:40.000 How about
00:58:40.500 we'll take
00:58:41.340 an all-expense
00:58:42.260 paid trip
00:58:42.920 to Davos,
00:58:44.740 an awesome
00:58:45.300 place.
00:58:46.160 You'll have
00:58:46.660 five-star
00:58:47.280 luxury.
00:58:48.460 You'll get
00:58:49.060 to meet all
00:58:49.660 these other
00:58:50.040 famous people.
00:58:51.880 How about
00:58:52.280 that?
00:58:52.620 That's the
00:58:54.300 least I
00:58:54.680 could do.
00:58:55.760 Yes, it's
00:58:56.280 literally the
00:58:56.860 least you
00:58:57.260 could do.
00:58:58.220 Attend a
00:58:58.800 meeting so
00:58:59.460 that you
00:58:59.820 look good
00:59:00.300 in a
00:59:01.120 luxury resort.
00:59:02.100 That is the
00:59:02.700 least you
00:59:03.140 could do
00:59:03.420 for black
00:59:03.820 people.
00:59:04.580 There's
00:59:04.860 nothing less
00:59:05.420 you could
00:59:05.720 do.
00:59:06.800 I can't
00:59:07.260 think of
00:59:07.500 anything less
00:59:08.120 important than
00:59:08.660 that.
00:59:10.240 So if you
00:59:11.200 think the
00:59:11.580 WEF is a
00:59:12.820 big,
00:59:13.120 important
00:59:13.540 entity,
00:59:16.260 who told
00:59:16.980 you that?
00:59:18.520 You know
00:59:19.080 who told
00:59:19.440 you that?
00:59:19.820 the guy
00:59:21.580 who puts
00:59:21.960 the WEF
00:59:22.800 together.
00:59:23.520 And then
00:59:23.780 you saw
00:59:24.120 the video
00:59:24.520 of him
00:59:24.820 saying he's
00:59:25.340 got all
00:59:25.640 kinds of
00:59:25.980 power.
00:59:27.140 Because that's
00:59:28.180 his marketing.
00:59:29.620 He's
00:59:30.040 marketing.
00:59:33.020 I'm pretty
00:59:33.700 sure all
00:59:34.200 of those
00:59:34.580 young economic
00:59:35.980 forum leaders,
00:59:37.380 they were all
00:59:38.100 going to have
00:59:38.380 the same
00:59:38.760 opinion whether
00:59:39.680 they flew to
00:59:40.600 Davos or
00:59:41.200 not.
00:59:42.280 Going to a
00:59:42.960 luxury vacation
00:59:43.820 in Davos
00:59:44.420 doesn't change
00:59:45.100 your opinion
00:59:45.540 of anything.
00:59:46.840 It just
00:59:47.200 exposes you
00:59:47.880 to more rich
00:59:48.720 people.
00:59:49.400 That's all
00:59:49.760 it does.
00:59:50.740 And Klaus
00:59:51.760 gets to feel
00:59:52.580 important and
00:59:53.340 he meets a
00:59:53.940 bunch of
00:59:54.180 rich people
00:59:54.700 and he's
00:59:56.280 80-something
00:59:57.000 years old.
00:59:59.660 The last
01:00:00.540 thing I'd
01:00:00.900 worry about
01:00:01.340 is the
01:00:01.640 World Economic
01:00:02.320 Forum.
01:00:03.780 I really
01:00:04.520 think that's
01:00:04.980 just for
01:00:05.340 show.
01:00:07.120 But we'll
01:00:08.480 see.
01:00:11.640 All right.
01:00:12.360 Anything else
01:00:12.880 in the news
01:00:13.880 that I'm
01:00:14.200 missing?
01:00:16.060 I think
01:00:16.720 we've done
01:00:17.140 it all.
01:00:18.340 All right.
01:00:18.700 that's all
01:00:23.220 for now.
01:00:23.560 Let me
01:00:23.720 ask you
01:00:24.020 one question
01:00:24.540 before I
01:00:25.260 sign off
01:00:25.920 on YouTube.
01:00:27.260 What do
01:00:27.460 you think
01:00:27.760 of the
01:00:28.120 phrase
01:00:28.560 black
01:00:29.280 words
01:00:29.700 thinking?
01:00:34.020 Insulting
01:00:34.500 or gets
01:00:35.900 to the
01:00:36.140 point?
01:00:41.020 Trouble.
01:00:41.500 What do
01:00:43.220 you think?
01:00:43.880 Racial.
01:00:44.280 It's racial,
01:00:44.980 of course.
01:00:46.260 I mean,
01:00:46.540 the topic is
01:00:47.100 racial.
01:00:49.760 No,
01:00:50.360 love it,
01:00:50.900 LOL.
01:00:54.500 Looking
01:00:54.900 black
01:00:55.260 words,
01:00:55.560 yes.
01:00:59.580 Yeah,
01:01:00.060 well,
01:01:00.360 as long as
01:01:00.900 white people
01:01:01.380 engage it in
01:01:02.180 as well.
01:01:02.620 Okay,
01:01:02.900 that's a good
01:01:03.300 comment.
01:01:04.180 So I
01:01:04.680 wouldn't say
01:01:05.120 that it's
01:01:05.560 black words
01:01:06.340 thinking is
01:01:06.960 something that
01:01:07.460 only black
01:01:08.040 people do.
01:01:08.820 That would
01:01:09.180 be racist.
01:01:10.400 Yeah,
01:01:10.580 that would
01:01:10.840 be racist.
01:01:11.520 So I'll
01:01:11.780 try to
01:01:12.020 avoid that.
01:01:13.360 It's about
01:01:14.000 mindset,
01:01:14.800 and that
01:01:15.280 would be
01:01:15.560 common to
01:01:16.260 just humans.
01:01:18.080 So yes,
01:01:18.420 I would say
01:01:18.800 black words
01:01:19.340 thinking could
01:01:19.940 be a
01:01:20.520 white person
01:01:21.240 who's
01:01:22.440 analyzing
01:01:23.220 the black
01:01:25.020 situation.
01:01:25.680 Same thing.
01:01:29.320 Yeah,
01:01:29.760 I would say
01:01:30.100 the CRT,
01:01:31.020 DEI,
01:01:31.840 ESG,
01:01:33.160 a lot of
01:01:33.600 them have
01:01:33.880 the same
01:01:34.280 component of
01:01:35.400 black words
01:01:36.100 thinking.
01:01:38.980 But it's
01:01:39.540 not limited
01:01:40.000 to black
01:01:40.420 people.
01:01:41.060 That's
01:01:41.140 the
01:01:41.260 codacity.
01:01:43.460 Yeah,
01:01:43.960 that's right,
01:01:44.300 there's a
01:01:44.560 word,
01:01:44.840 codacity.
01:01:47.220 Caucasian
01:01:47.620 audacity
01:01:48.200 is
01:01:49.160 codacity.
01:01:50.920 So I
01:01:51.360 guess there's
01:01:51.840 a little
01:01:53.240 precedent for
01:01:54.860 this kind
01:01:55.380 of word
01:01:55.660 play.
01:01:57.840 The woke
01:01:58.560 won't like
01:01:59.100 black words.
01:01:59.740 What's the
01:02:00.080 point?
01:02:01.440 See,
01:02:01.680 if you
01:02:01.880 can get
01:02:02.220 the woke
01:02:02.640 to argue
01:02:03.320 the word,
01:02:05.120 you win.
01:02:07.120 That would
01:02:07.720 be winning.
01:02:08.140 Get people
01:02:09.160 to argue
01:02:09.560 that the
01:02:09.960 word is
01:02:10.360 the wrong
01:02:10.640 word.
01:02:11.260 That would
01:02:11.600 be winning.
01:02:14.740 By the
01:02:15.760 way,
01:02:15.940 I wouldn't
01:02:16.200 use this
01:02:16.560 at work,
01:02:16.960 you would
01:02:17.140 totally get
01:02:17.560 fired.
01:02:18.780 Oh,
01:02:18.980 just to be
01:02:19.380 clear.
01:02:19.940 There's
01:02:20.120 something that
01:02:20.540 I can say
01:02:21.040 that you
01:02:21.340 can't say,
01:02:22.380 because I
01:02:22.960 have something
01:02:23.420 closer to
01:02:24.060 free speech.
01:02:26.120 Has anybody
01:02:26.880 marveled at the
01:02:27.740 fact that I
01:02:28.220 have free speech
01:02:28.880 now and I'm
01:02:29.520 using it?
01:02:31.060 If you
01:02:31.600 haven't seen
01:02:32.000 the Dilbert
01:02:32.680 comic lately,
01:02:33.980 Dilbert Reborn,
01:02:34.760 it's only on the
01:02:35.420 subscription site now,
01:02:36.420 you wouldn't
01:02:37.480 fully appreciate
01:02:38.180 it.
01:02:39.440 But,
01:02:40.580 yeah,
01:02:41.280 you're jealous.
01:02:42.060 It's fun.
01:02:43.680 It really is an
01:02:44.540 amazing feeling.
01:02:45.420 I didn't think
01:02:45.840 I'd ever feel it,
01:02:47.100 that I could
01:02:47.540 actually just say
01:02:48.860 what I think
01:02:49.320 is true.
01:02:50.840 I could just
01:02:51.260 say it.
01:02:52.520 Other people
01:02:53.020 can't do it.
01:02:54.200 Yeah,
01:02:54.380 I paid for it.
01:02:55.020 It was very
01:02:55.400 expensive.
01:02:56.260 But I think
01:02:56.880 I got my
01:02:57.320 money's worth.
01:03:00.240 Thoughts on
01:03:00.780 good credit
01:03:01.260 punishment?
01:03:01.880 We talked
01:03:02.280 about that.
01:03:04.420 What?
01:03:05.000 Wait a minute.
01:03:05.700 Did you just
01:03:07.380 make that?
01:03:11.880 Because I'm
01:03:12.380 seeing a meme
01:03:12.960 that says
01:03:13.360 black words.
01:03:14.140 Did that
01:03:14.420 already exist?
01:03:15.540 Or did you
01:03:15.960 just make that
01:03:16.560 up on the
01:03:16.940 fly?
01:03:18.000 You have to
01:03:18.360 tell me,
01:03:19.820 that's a
01:03:20.720 book title.
01:03:21.920 Oh,
01:03:22.340 it's a
01:03:22.580 book title.
01:03:24.040 Apparently
01:03:24.400 it's a
01:03:24.740 book title.
01:03:25.440 Well,
01:03:25.640 now you
01:03:25.900 have to
01:03:26.140 tell me,
01:03:26.800 is the
01:03:28.140 author
01:03:28.460 black?
01:03:29.580 Because if
01:03:30.100 the author's
01:03:30.600 black,
01:03:31.000 I'm in
01:03:31.260 good shape.
01:03:33.700 Is the
01:03:34.200 author black?
01:03:35.700 He was
01:03:43.080 assassinated.
01:03:43.960 What?
01:03:46.520 It would
01:03:47.140 not have
01:03:47.500 been published
01:03:48.060 otherwise.
01:03:48.800 Well,
01:03:49.160 yeah.
01:03:51.760 By Ron
01:03:52.700 Christie.
01:03:55.060 No,
01:03:55.620 that doesn't
01:03:56.180 sound as
01:03:57.440 black as it
01:03:58.160 could sound.
01:04:00.320 Yeah,
01:04:00.860 you can't
01:04:01.120 tell by the
01:04:01.560 name,
01:04:01.880 but,
01:04:02.100 all right,
01:04:05.420 well,
01:04:06.380 so I'll
01:04:06.620 have to
01:04:06.800 watch out
01:04:07.180 for that.
01:04:07.480 Because if
01:04:07.740 it turns out
01:04:08.560 that the
01:04:08.840 guy who
01:04:09.160 wrote that
01:04:09.540 book has
01:04:10.240 any sketchy
01:04:11.160 accusations,
01:04:11.940 I better
01:04:12.180 stay away
01:04:12.580 from it.
01:04:16.480 Yeah,
01:04:17.080 Ron,
01:04:18.580 have you
01:04:18.940 ever met
01:04:19.260 a black
01:04:19.800 guy named
01:04:20.320 Ronnie?
01:04:21.580 Oh,
01:04:22.020 yeah,
01:04:22.200 Ronnie
01:04:22.440 Lott.
01:04:23.160 Ronnie
01:04:23.400 Lott.
01:04:24.540 Yeah,
01:04:24.840 Ronnie
01:04:25.040 Lott.
01:04:25.360 So that
01:04:26.280 could be,
01:04:26.800 yeah,
01:04:27.020 that could
01:04:27.280 easily be
01:04:27.740 a black
01:04:28.000 name.
01:04:30.060 So,
01:04:34.340 curious to
01:04:35.300 your
01:04:35.480 tone
01:04:35.660 sentence.
01:04:37.720 Oh,
01:04:38.200 it's on
01:04:38.500 Urban
01:04:38.780 Dictionary
01:04:39.300 already.
01:04:40.740 And it's
01:04:41.260 used the
01:04:41.660 same way,
01:04:42.140 right?
01:04:42.900 In the
01:04:43.220 Urban
01:04:43.440 Dictionary,
01:04:44.120 is it
01:04:44.340 defined as
01:04:45.180 sort of
01:04:46.620 looking backwards
01:04:47.300 instead of
01:04:47.760 forwards?
01:04:48.560 I assume
01:04:49.140 it is.
01:04:50.480 Oh,
01:04:50.720 he is
01:04:50.920 black,
01:04:51.280 somebody
01:04:51.480 says.
01:04:52.840 He's a
01:04:53.400 black
01:04:53.680 Republican
01:04:54.220 strategist?
01:04:55.880 The
01:04:56.060 Ron
01:04:56.980 Christie
01:04:57.360 is a
01:04:57.660 black
01:04:57.860 man.
01:04:58.000 Oh,
01:04:58.180 we have
01:04:58.380 confirmation.
01:04:59.560 So somebody
01:05:00.040 looked it
01:05:00.400 up.
01:05:00.620 Ron
01:05:00.880 Christie
01:05:01.160 is a
01:05:01.480 black
01:05:01.680 man,
01:05:02.420 and he
01:05:03.080 wrote a
01:05:03.420 book called
01:05:05.340 Black
01:05:05.740 Words.
01:05:06.900 We'll have
01:05:07.260 to take a
01:05:07.620 look at
01:05:07.840 that.
01:05:09.360 I do
01:05:09.900 think it's
01:05:10.380 a strong
01:05:11.580 play.
01:05:19.240 All
01:05:19.720 right.
01:05:19.880 I
01:05:21.880 guess lots
01:05:26.400 of
01:05:26.500 people
01:05:26.700 had
01:05:26.920 black
01:05:27.380 friends
01:05:27.680 named
01:05:27.940 Ronnie.
01:05:28.940 So Ronnie
01:05:29.380 is more
01:05:29.680 common
01:05:30.000 than I
01:05:30.300 thought.
01:05:36.580 I just
01:05:37.600 love the
01:05:37.980 fact that I
01:05:38.420 can just
01:05:38.720 talk about
01:05:39.220 this topic
01:05:39.760 without
01:05:40.040 worry.
01:05:42.260 It's
01:05:42.660 such a
01:05:43.040 freeing
01:05:43.480 thing.
01:05:44.860 If I
01:05:45.260 could find
01:05:45.600 just a
01:05:45.960 few more
01:05:46.300 people to
01:05:46.720 talk to,
01:05:47.140 ideally,
01:05:49.260 I'd love
01:05:49.560 to talk
01:05:49.840 to black
01:05:50.280 guys who
01:05:50.820 are also
01:05:51.180 completely
01:05:51.660 free and
01:05:52.740 can just
01:05:53.080 use free
01:05:53.540 speech.
01:05:54.620 That would
01:05:55.200 be
01:05:55.320 interesting.
01:05:57.720 All
01:05:58.080 right.
01:05:58.720 YouTube,
01:05:59.300 bye for
01:05:59.700 now.
01:06:00.560 Talk to
01:06:00.900 you tomorrow.