Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2100 Scott Adams： Kamala The AI Czar, Trump Deposition, Tucker On Intel Control Of Congress

00:00:00.000 Da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-cha-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da 0.82

00:00:05.860 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of civilization.

00:00:11.620 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and you've never been happier.

00:00:15.840 Today will be maybe more amazing than usual because the news has served up funny stories,

00:00:22.660 which we like.

00:00:24.100 No, there will be no stories of giant phallus icebergs today,

00:00:28.240 but still, still we'll make something out of it.

00:00:31.060 It's amazing how we can do that.

00:00:33.080 All right, we're going to go private here on Locals.

00:00:36.040 And if you'd like to take your experience up a notch,

00:00:38.800 well, all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass,

00:00:41.480 a tanker, a chalice, a stein, a canteen, a jug, or a flask,

00:00:44.760 a vessel of any kind.

00:00:46.440 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.

00:00:49.480 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure,

00:00:52.700 the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:55.780 It's called the simultaneous sip.

00:00:58.900 It happens now. Go.

00:01:06.380 Yeah, that's how to start your morning, just like that.

00:01:09.900 You ready now? Now are you ready?

00:01:12.820 Well, you should be.

00:01:14.940 Well, yesterday in the news,

00:01:16.820 I'd like to summarize the headlines

00:01:20.060 from all of the major news entities that I checked today.

00:01:24.660 Summary.

00:01:26.180 Some British stuff happened yesterday.

00:01:29.700 Some British stuff.

00:01:31.800 I believe there were colorful outfits involved.

00:01:35.020 You know, my trouble with the monarchy

00:01:39.000 is not that it's not fun and interesting,

00:01:44.480 but that it feels more like somebody's hobby.

00:01:48.040 Doesn't it?

00:01:49.440 Like, it doesn't feel like a news event.

00:01:52.000 It feels like a hobby.

00:01:54.020 Oh, I really like talking about the royals.

00:01:59.220 Well, that's a hobby.

00:02:01.160 Or I really like seeing what outfits they wear

00:02:04.040 and the pageant and the ceremony.

00:02:06.580 It's like a dog show.

00:02:08.280 It's like any other hobby you like,

00:02:10.020 a sporting event.

00:02:11.360 I'm not entirely sure it deserves

00:02:13.500 all of our headlines in the United States.

00:02:16.780 And I'm in favor of the royal family.

00:02:19.400 No problem with it.

00:02:20.620 People like it.

00:02:22.200 If you like your king, keep your king.

00:02:25.320 But I don't know why that...

00:02:27.320 I don't know why it's news.

00:02:30.260 But there's a lot of it.

00:02:32.240 However, the news of coordinating a new king

00:02:35.760 in Great Britain pales in comparison

00:02:38.420 to the news that Kamala Harris

00:02:41.240 has been selected as the AI czar.

00:02:46.700 What?

00:02:47.220 Is the simulation messing with us?

00:02:53.680 Did the president of the United States

00:02:55.560 literally select

00:02:58.000 the least intelligent politician of all time

00:03:01.420 to be the czar of an advanced intelligence?

00:03:05.620 That didn't really happen, did it?

00:03:08.260 No.

00:03:09.500 Did that really, really happen?

00:03:12.060 Tell me that didn't happen.

00:03:13.340 That couldn't have possibly happened

00:03:16.540 in the real world.

00:03:19.720 It did?

00:03:22.780 What's going on?

00:03:24.700 I mean, come on.

00:03:26.600 Come on.

00:03:28.360 That's too far.

00:03:30.260 That's just too far.

00:03:32.700 All right.

00:03:33.800 Well, that happened.

00:03:36.580 Whereas Dana Perino said,

00:03:38.720 quote,

00:03:38.980 What made Biden think this was a good idea?

00:03:46.240 Dana Perino with her

00:03:47.720 understatement of the century.

00:03:51.440 Well, let's give somebody who's

00:03:53.600 famous for being a babbling idiot. 0.59

00:03:57.400 Who do we have?

00:03:58.280 Who do we have?

00:03:59.720 Well, there's this guy, Bob,

00:04:01.260 who's always, you know,

00:04:02.720 on the street saying nonsense.

00:04:04.400 No, Bob is not famous enough.

00:04:05.840 We need somebody who's famous

00:04:08.020 for being a babbling idiot. 0.97

00:04:11.340 Well, we got, I got an idea.

00:04:13.600 Got a vice president.

00:04:15.800 All right.

00:04:16.200 Well, I don't know how that conversation went down,

00:04:18.100 but it's funny either way.

00:04:20.760 We found out that TikTok had been

00:04:24.260 tracking your watching of gay content on TikTok. 0.67

00:04:28.960 So they had a list of people

00:04:30.380 who like to watch gay content on TikTok. 0.73

00:04:32.300 That's no problem, is it?

00:04:39.580 And some people said that

00:04:41.220 maybe for countries that were less open

00:04:44.140 than, let's say, the United States,

00:04:46.420 such information could be used for blackmail.

00:04:49.260 Well, I got news for you.

00:04:52.800 You could use that for blackmail

00:04:54.200 in the United States too.

00:04:55.480 Because there got to be people

00:05:00.840 who do not identify as LGBTQ

00:05:03.200 who, for whatever reason,

00:05:05.860 are looking at the content.

00:05:08.040 And, you know, as the article said,

00:05:09.660 it doesn't mean that they are members.

00:05:11.560 They might just be interested in the content

00:05:13.700 for whatever reason.

00:05:15.340 And I thought, well,

00:05:18.760 here's one more reason

00:05:19.960 to get rid of TikTok.

00:05:21.260 Now, TikTok says

00:05:23.240 they got rid of that feature,

00:05:25.400 that tracking feature

00:05:26.280 for the United States.

00:05:27.620 Because I guess the U.S. TikTok

00:05:29.080 is at least a little bit

00:05:30.600 walled off in some way.

00:05:32.440 But how do you like the fact

00:05:34.920 that they could do it?

00:05:37.160 Forget about the fact that they did it.

00:05:40.200 How about the fact that they can do it?

00:05:42.460 It's just one of those things they can do.

00:05:44.180 It actually would appear

00:05:45.160 right on the dashboard,

00:05:47.120 a list of people who looked

00:05:48.320 at all the gay stuff on TikTok. 0.92

00:05:52.240 What else do they have a list for?

00:05:54.900 We know they have a button for heat.

00:05:56.940 They can make any post go viral.

00:06:02.760 It's just mind-boggling

00:06:04.440 that it's still legal in the U.S.

00:06:08.080 Our government is just so corrupt

00:06:10.540 that the simplest thing,

00:06:12.480 the most obvious, simplest thing,

00:06:14.860 can't pull it off.

00:06:16.240 That's such an obvious tell for corruption.

00:06:18.220 Probably China interests, I guess.

00:06:22.160 Well, here's something

00:06:23.320 I never thought would happen.

00:06:25.820 The sport of bicycle racing

00:06:27.480 became interesting.

00:06:30.040 Did anybody see that coming?

00:06:31.520 You know, it wasn't until the,

00:06:36.660 was it Lance Armstrong,

00:06:38.100 who had one testicle

00:06:39.480 and performance-enhancing drugs,

00:06:42.660 and I said,

00:06:43.140 now, that guy's interesting.

00:06:44.980 The bicycle riding,

00:06:47.160 not so interesting.

00:06:48.760 At least the star is interesting.

00:06:50.580 You know, he's doing some stuff.

00:06:51.980 But now the tennis legend

00:06:56.520 Martina Novotrilova 1.00

00:06:58.320 is one of the people

00:07:00.400 complaining about a biological,

00:07:04.180 well, let's say a trans woman

00:07:05.920 winning some big bicycle race

00:07:09.640 in Mexico, New Mexico.

00:07:11.720 Austin Killips

00:07:12.760 winning the women's overall category.

00:07:15.600 Now,

00:07:17.880 do you think that it's like

00:07:20.640 extra vexing

00:07:21.660 because Austin didn't bother

00:07:23.120 to change Austin's name

00:07:25.380 from a male-sounding name

00:07:27.720 to a female-sounding name 0.51

00:07:28.940 when Austin transitioned?

00:07:32.880 Don't you feel that the women 0.99

00:07:34.740 in that race

00:07:35.560 were a little extra, extra mad

00:07:38.400 because Austin

00:07:41.560 is still called Austin

00:07:42.680 and won the race?

00:07:44.100 Now,

00:07:47.020 I don't think there's anything

00:07:48.780 less important

00:07:49.600 than bicycle racing.

00:07:51.220 Maybe in the whole world.

00:07:53.120 It's hard to think of anything

00:07:54.000 less important than that.

00:07:56.160 Who's the best at

00:07:57.340 pumping this bicycle

00:07:59.080 up a long mountain?

00:08:01.880 I don't care.

00:08:03.760 Does it matter

00:08:04.520 who's the best at that?

00:08:06.320 I don't know.

00:08:07.240 But they did find a way

00:08:08.400 to make it interesting

00:08:09.160 by having some controversy

00:08:10.720 injected into the sports.

00:08:12.400 So I'm going to say

00:08:13.560 that's a plus.

00:08:15.680 Not so good for the women 1.00

00:08:17.240 who wanted to be the winner.

00:08:19.740 But here's an interesting question,

00:08:24.780 in my opinion.

00:08:26.220 What is the point,

00:08:28.260 the purpose,

00:08:29.740 of bicycle racing?

00:08:32.080 What is his purpose?

00:08:34.080 I mean, besides making money,

00:08:35.840 of course.

00:08:36.500 But what's his purpose?

00:08:37.360 Is it for the benefit

00:08:39.820 of the athletes?

00:08:42.440 Or is it,

00:08:43.740 because it's a professional sport,

00:08:45.560 or is it for the benefit

00:08:47.000 of the observers?

00:08:49.820 If it's for the benefit

00:08:50.980 of the observers,

00:08:51.920 I think the situation's fine,

00:08:53.760 because it gave the observers

00:08:54.920 something to talk about.

00:08:56.800 Other than,

00:08:58.060 oh, that bicycle sure went fast.

00:09:00.440 Nothing else to talk about.

00:09:01.520 So if it's for the,

00:09:04.260 if bicycle racing

00:09:05.240 is for the benefit

00:09:06.040 of the athletes,

00:09:07.480 then some of them

00:09:08.420 probably have something

00:09:09.120 to complain about,

00:09:10.840 because the female athletes, 0.99

00:09:12.440 you know,

00:09:13.540 were disadvantaged,

00:09:15.820 as some would say.

00:09:17.720 But apparently,

00:09:18.700 this particular competitor

00:09:20.740 was under the limits

00:09:23.340 of testosterone.

00:09:24.080 So they do have some limits

00:09:26.320 on your testosterone level.

00:09:28.640 And this,

00:09:29.140 this athlete

00:09:30.780 passed that limit.

00:09:32.940 Still,

00:09:34.340 still,

00:09:35.200 it's an athlete

00:09:35.640 who is larger in size.

00:09:37.840 And some would say

00:09:38.840 that was unfair.

00:09:40.740 But anything to make

00:09:42.140 bicycle racing

00:09:42.920 more interesting,

00:09:43.680 I'm in favor of it.

00:09:45.400 Well,

00:09:45.760 Tucker has

00:09:46.400 sort of emerged.

00:09:49.840 He did a

00:09:50.400 interview I saw

00:09:51.920 with Tulsi Gabbard.

00:09:54.720 And he continues

00:09:56.020 to make news.

00:09:58.780 And he said,

00:09:59.800 he told a fascinating story

00:10:01.580 about how

00:10:02.220 he got interested

00:10:04.320 in Trump

00:10:04.960 from not being interested

00:10:06.460 at all in the beginning.

00:10:08.100 And he said

00:10:09.460 it was because

00:10:10.080 Trump kept asking questions

00:10:11.780 that

00:10:13.140 were only obvious questions

00:10:15.660 after you heard them.

00:10:16.960 Such as,

00:10:17.940 why are we funding NATO?

00:10:20.220 That would be one example

00:10:21.620 that Tucker gave.

00:10:23.540 And Tucker said,

00:10:24.660 quite reasonably,

00:10:25.740 I never even thought

00:10:26.580 about it.

00:10:27.720 Like,

00:10:27.940 it was never even

00:10:28.520 a question.

00:10:29.320 But as soon as

00:10:30.080 he asked the question,

00:10:30.900 everybody got mad.

00:10:32.580 And when everybody

00:10:33.160 got mad

00:10:33.900 and would be too angry

00:10:35.340 to answer the question,

00:10:37.160 Tucker realized

00:10:37.820 there was something there.

00:10:39.360 You know,

00:10:39.880 and also about

00:10:40.460 immigration

00:10:41.000 and other questions.

00:10:41.920 So it wasn't so much

00:10:43.540 what Trump was asking,

00:10:45.540 according to Tucker,

00:10:46.660 it was the fact

00:10:47.460 that nobody

00:10:47.860 would answer him.

00:10:49.700 And that told him

00:10:50.380 everything.

00:10:50.900 That was a tell,

00:10:52.020 he said,

00:10:52.480 that the government

00:10:53.140 was worse off

00:10:55.680 than maybe he thought.

00:10:59.100 All right,

00:10:59.560 so,

00:10:59.980 Tucker also continues

00:11:02.080 to say that

00:11:02.760 members of Congress

00:11:03.680 are controlled

00:11:04.320 by the intelligence community,

00:11:05.860 just as a fact.

00:11:08.720 Because he knows people

00:11:10.120 personally,

00:11:11.640 and he can tell you

00:11:13.060 with complete confidence

00:11:14.580 that the intel agencies

00:11:16.340 own members of Congress.

00:11:18.380 Important ones.

00:11:20.720 Now,

00:11:21.720 that's all you need

00:11:23.040 to know,

00:11:23.440 isn't it?

00:11:24.160 That explains

00:11:25.080 everything we've seen.

00:11:27.420 100% of everything

00:11:28.820 in the news,

00:11:30.100 politically,

00:11:30.840 is explained

00:11:31.900 by that one thing.

00:11:32.820 You can explain

00:11:34.140 your January 6th.

00:11:36.340 You can explain

00:11:37.840 any irregularities

00:11:39.820 in voting.

00:11:41.160 It's like,

00:11:41.620 it fits every narrative.

00:11:44.700 It doesn't mean

00:11:45.700 that it fits them correctly.

00:11:47.540 I mean,

00:11:47.800 I might be force-fitting

00:11:48.840 them in there.

00:11:49.680 But everything

00:11:50.460 that you suspected

00:11:51.400 might be a little sketchy

00:11:52.740 would be completely

00:11:54.780 explained

00:11:55.440 by the intelligence

00:11:57.120 community

00:11:57.860 running the country.

00:12:00.460 I'm not saying

00:12:01.380 it is.

00:12:01.860 but it would

00:12:03.560 explain everything.

00:12:05.840 All right.

00:12:08.700 Biden was

00:12:09.900 complaining

00:12:11.980 in an interview

00:12:12.640 about his low

00:12:13.800 approval ratings,

00:12:15.100 relatively low

00:12:15.860 approval ratings,

00:12:16.940 and Biden said

00:12:18.140 that the problem

00:12:19.520 was negative

00:12:20.680 press.

00:12:22.480 Negative press

00:12:23.680 for Biden.

00:12:26.640 He actually

00:12:27.600 said that

00:12:28.060 with a straight face

00:12:29.020 to MSNBC.

00:12:31.860 He thought MSNBC

00:12:33.200 was giving him

00:12:33.880 negative press.

00:12:36.240 Compared to,

00:12:37.740 compared to

00:12:40.200 what?

00:12:42.480 Compared to

00:12:43.680 Trump?

00:12:47.440 Come on.

00:12:48.980 Or as Joe would say,

00:12:50.200 come on.

00:12:51.840 I'm not joking.

00:12:53.520 Yeah,

00:12:53.920 that's his problem.

00:12:54.640 All that negative press

00:12:56.100 from the left.

00:13:01.120 Here's something

00:13:01.940 that I saw today

00:13:02.980 that I did not know.

00:13:04.820 Remember I predicted

00:13:06.200 that AI would become

00:13:07.980 illegal?

00:13:10.560 Anywhere that AI

00:13:11.700 could really make

00:13:12.600 a difference,

00:13:13.200 it's going to become

00:13:13.880 illegal.

00:13:15.460 It'll become illegal

00:13:16.660 partly because people

00:13:18.280 don't want to lose jobs.

00:13:20.060 There'll be security

00:13:20.980 interests.

00:13:21.560 We'll find a million

00:13:23.500 different reasons

00:13:24.260 to make something

00:13:25.120 illegal.

00:13:26.140 Oh, it's a privacy

00:13:27.140 problem.

00:13:27.760 We've got to make

00:13:28.380 it illegal.

00:13:29.480 Well, today I found

00:13:30.380 out that if I were

00:13:32.280 to pursue my plan

00:13:33.640 of using AI

00:13:35.740 to create an

00:13:36.740 audio book

00:13:37.480 of some of my books

00:13:38.980 that don't have

00:13:39.840 an audio available,

00:13:42.140 that Amazon

00:13:42.900 will not accept

00:13:43.920 it on their website.

00:13:46.620 And Audible

00:13:47.500 will not accept it.

00:13:48.560 Just think about that.

00:13:52.480 AI is the obvious

00:13:53.940 way to make

00:13:54.500 an audio book.

00:13:55.260 It's the obvious way.

00:13:56.500 But Amazon has

00:13:57.440 deals with Audible.

00:13:59.660 Audible's business

00:14:00.480 model would basically

00:14:01.420 just disappear

00:14:02.260 because it's humans

00:14:03.500 reading books.

00:14:05.940 So probably Amazon

00:14:07.480 talks to Audible

00:14:08.320 and says,

00:14:09.060 uh-oh,

00:14:09.680 we don't want our

00:14:10.700 whole audio book

00:14:11.540 thing to disappear,

00:14:12.940 so what do you

00:14:14.340 Audible guys need?

00:14:15.700 And the Audible

00:14:16.240 guys say,

00:14:17.280 or Audible

00:14:18.360 women say, 1.00

00:14:19.860 well,

00:14:20.780 don't let that

00:14:21.520 AI voice generated

00:14:22.740 stuff on your

00:14:23.340 platform.

00:14:25.900 And then Amazon

00:14:27.020 says,

00:14:27.580 okay.

00:14:28.340 Now you can still

00:14:29.180 put that content

00:14:30.080 on,

00:14:31.180 at least last I knew,

00:14:33.540 Google Play

00:14:34.220 and Barnes & Noble

00:14:35.060 and Spotify,

00:14:36.440 so it's not

00:14:37.580 illegal everywhere,

00:14:38.900 but if your

00:14:39.440 audio book is

00:14:40.180 illegal on Amazon,

00:14:42.180 it's as good

00:14:43.440 as impossible.

00:14:44.620 I mean,

00:14:44.880 because economically

00:14:45.280 people wouldn't

00:14:46.820 probably wouldn't

00:14:47.580 bother.

00:14:49.080 So,

00:14:49.720 I was looking up,

00:14:51.800 I saw this on

00:14:52.360 the website for

00:14:53.180 a company that

00:14:54.100 offers a service

00:14:55.640 to have a variety

00:14:57.460 of voices read

00:14:59.260 your book for you

00:14:59.900 to make an

00:15:00.560 audio book,

00:15:01.580 and it warned

00:15:02.700 that you couldn't

00:15:03.320 sell the audio

00:15:03.920 book on Amazon.

00:15:07.020 So,

00:15:07.940 anyway,

00:15:08.420 more to my,

00:15:09.380 that has more

00:15:10.020 to do with my

00:15:10.540 prediction that

00:15:11.340 we will cripple 1.00

00:15:13.500 AI by making it

00:15:14.560 illegal everywhere

00:15:16.020 where we can

00:15:16.680 for financial

00:15:18.320 interests.

00:15:20.060 Well,

00:15:20.260 California's

00:15:20.920 Reparation Task

00:15:22.020 Force,

00:15:22.500 the one that

00:15:22.840 recommended a

00:15:24.200 gazillion dollars

00:15:24.960 of reparations,

00:15:26.200 is also voting

00:15:27.040 on whether

00:15:27.500 California should 0.96

00:15:28.420 apologize,

00:15:29.520 formally apologize,

00:15:30.340 for the state's

00:15:33.080 legacy of slavery

00:15:34.100 and discrimination

00:15:34.780 against black 1.00

00:15:35.580 people.

00:15:36.400 Now,

00:15:36.680 the first thing

00:15:37.160 you're going to

00:15:37.480 say is,

00:15:38.100 Scott,

00:15:39.400 California didn't

00:15:40.320 have a legacy

00:15:40.920 of slavery.

00:15:42.460 Well,

00:15:42.920 not exactly.

00:15:44.600 Although there

00:15:45.120 was not slavery

00:15:46.120 per se,

00:15:47.820 the reporting

00:15:48.900 says that

00:15:49.500 California would,

00:15:50.580 for example,

00:15:51.820 return escaped

00:15:52.740 slaves to

00:15:54.020 slave states.

00:15:55.820 So,

00:15:56.680 that was

00:15:57.360 participating in

00:15:58.240 slavery.

00:15:58.800 There's no way

00:15:59.280 around that.

00:16:00.640 If California

00:16:02.040 returned slaves

00:16:04.000 to slave states, 0.61

00:16:05.880 they were

00:16:06.240 absolutely part

00:16:07.020 of slavery.

00:16:08.520 Would you

00:16:08.840 agree?

00:16:09.060 That was

00:16:10.880 something I

00:16:11.960 hadn't heard

00:16:12.340 before.

00:16:14.400 Not participating

00:16:15.800 in exactly the

00:16:16.800 same way,

00:16:17.740 but that's

00:16:18.380 certainly part

00:16:18.900 of the process.

00:16:19.920 Because if

00:16:20.460 slaves could 0.95

00:16:21.020 just run

00:16:21.460 away and

00:16:21.860 go to a

00:16:22.280 state where

00:16:22.660 there's no

00:16:23.080 slavery,

00:16:24.640 probably it

00:16:25.440 would have

00:16:25.600 been hard

00:16:25.960 to maintain

00:16:26.480 slavery,

00:16:27.560 because all

00:16:27.940 they need

00:16:28.320 to do is

00:16:29.120 run away.

00:16:30.460 So,

00:16:31.660 having states

00:16:32.680 be willing

00:16:33.140 to return

00:16:33.740 the slaves

00:16:34.240 seems to

00:16:35.000 me a

00:16:36.180 pretty important

00:16:36.820 part of

00:16:37.280 keeping

00:16:37.560 slavery

00:16:38.120 an active

00:16:39.460 thing.

00:16:40.700 So,

00:16:40.980 I would

00:16:41.160 agree that

00:16:41.680 there's

00:16:41.940 something to

00:16:42.420 let's say

00:16:44.600 account for.

00:16:46.180 But,

00:16:46.860 what do you

00:16:47.240 think of

00:16:47.460 this idea

00:16:48.000 of an

00:16:48.740 apology?

00:16:51.320 Well,

00:16:52.300 the question

00:16:52.860 I asked is

00:16:53.580 who would

00:16:53.860 give this

00:16:54.220 apology?

00:16:55.920 Because there

00:16:56.600 are no

00:16:56.840 living people

00:16:57.600 who need

00:16:58.540 to apologize.

00:17:00.320 But,

00:17:01.000 let's say

00:17:02.020 it's the

00:17:02.440 governor.

00:17:04.160 Do you

00:17:04.520 think that

00:17:05.360 the real

00:17:06.520 motive here

00:17:08.100 is to

00:17:10.380 just

00:17:10.680 humiliate

00:17:11.500 a white

00:17:11.900 person in

00:17:12.440 public?

00:17:13.940 Because that's

00:17:14.700 what it

00:17:14.920 looks like,

00:17:15.320 right?

00:17:15.900 This is all

00:17:16.660 about just

00:17:17.120 humiliating

00:17:17.660 white people,

00:17:18.260 isn't it?

00:17:19.860 Because I

00:17:20.440 don't see that

00:17:21.000 an apology

00:17:21.660 would help

00:17:22.080 anybody when

00:17:23.400 it's coming

00:17:23.860 from someone

00:17:24.360 who had

00:17:24.640 nothing to

00:17:25.080 do with

00:17:25.320 anything.

00:17:26.740 So,

00:17:27.060 to me,

00:17:27.300 it looks

00:17:27.520 like just

00:17:28.020 another

00:17:28.580 public show

00:17:29.460 trial of

00:17:30.160 how to

00:17:30.620 humiliate

00:17:31.380 white people

00:17:31.900 as part of

00:17:32.980 the continuous

00:17:34.100 process of

00:17:35.760 doing that.

00:17:36.160 so I

00:17:37.460 would like

00:17:37.780 to volunteer

00:17:38.540 to be

00:17:39.120 the one

00:17:39.480 to give

00:17:39.780 the apology

00:17:40.300 if I

00:17:41.680 could.

00:17:42.960 I'd like

00:17:43.560 California

00:17:44.060 to nominate

00:17:44.720 me if

00:17:45.480 they vote

00:17:45.800 for this.

00:17:46.780 I would

00:17:47.220 like to be

00:17:47.560 the one

00:17:47.800 to give

00:17:48.020 the apology

00:17:48.500 because this

00:17:50.400 calls for a

00:17:51.280 special kind

00:17:51.880 of apology,

00:17:52.520 doesn't it?

00:17:53.940 There's a

00:17:54.540 special kind.

00:17:55.840 I have a

00:17:56.540 name for

00:17:56.900 this kind

00:17:57.260 of apology.

00:17:58.320 Do you

00:17:58.580 know what

00:17:58.780 it's called?

00:18:00.400 What's the

00:18:01.020 name for

00:18:01.440 this kind

00:18:01.860 of apology?

00:18:04.000 A husband

00:18:04.720 apology.

00:18:05.160 It's called

00:18:05.900 a husband

00:18:06.280 apology.

00:18:07.860 A husband

00:18:08.540 apology works

00:18:09.360 like this.

00:18:10.680 You know

00:18:11.180 you don't

00:18:11.720 owe an

00:18:12.040 apology,

00:18:13.720 but because

00:18:14.760 you have

00:18:15.180 low regard

00:18:15.880 for the

00:18:16.240 person who

00:18:17.000 is demanding

00:18:17.560 it,

00:18:18.280 you give

00:18:18.920 them one

00:18:19.420 because you

00:18:20.360 have a

00:18:20.620 very low

00:18:21.060 opinion of

00:18:21.600 them.

00:18:23.400 So I

00:18:23.960 have a

00:18:24.260 very low

00:18:24.760 opinion of

00:18:25.260 the people

00:18:25.580 demanding

00:18:26.080 the apology

00:18:26.680 because it

00:18:27.200 looks like

00:18:27.520 just a way

00:18:28.180 to humiliate

00:18:28.780 white people.

00:18:29.640 So I

00:18:29.960 would love

00:18:30.300 to be the

00:18:30.660 one to give

00:18:31.020 the apology.

00:18:32.080 I will

00:18:32.420 give you

00:18:32.760 the husband

00:18:33.300 apology,

00:18:33.840 that

00:18:34.640 absolutely

00:18:35.600 disrespects

00:18:36.960 the people

00:18:37.320 getting it

00:18:37.820 more than

00:18:38.200 anything you've

00:18:38.840 ever heard

00:18:39.160 in your

00:18:39.360 life.

00:18:40.100 I will

00:18:40.600 show so

00:18:41.100 little respect

00:18:41.980 for the

00:18:42.900 people receiving

00:18:43.580 the apology

00:18:44.120 that you'll

00:18:44.580 wish you'd

00:18:44.880 never asked

00:18:45.300 for it.

00:18:46.360 And that's

00:18:46.720 what I

00:18:46.960 call a

00:18:47.600 husband

00:18:47.840 apology.

00:18:48.860 Because by

00:18:49.380 the way,

00:18:49.920 fuck you, 0.99

00:18:50.440 everybody asking

00:18:51.060 for it.

00:18:51.880 Because really

00:18:52.360 it's just a

00:18:52.860 way to shame

00:18:53.400 and humiliate 0.55

00:18:54.120 white people.

00:18:54.760 Let's be

00:18:55.020 honest,

00:18:55.880 that's all

00:18:56.280 it is.

00:18:57.420 And if

00:18:57.700 you want to

00:18:58.580 do that,

00:18:59.240 please have

00:18:59.760 me deliver

00:19:01.140 the apology.

00:19:01.720 I'll be

00:19:02.620 happy to

00:19:03.020 give you

00:19:03.320 a fake

00:19:03.760 fucking

00:19:04.140 apology

00:19:04.580 to

00:19:06.120 satisfy

00:19:06.640 your

00:19:07.140 well,

00:19:11.180 whatever it

00:19:11.920 is that

00:19:12.200 you need.

00:19:13.100 Whatever it

00:19:13.800 is you

00:19:14.060 need,

00:19:14.380 if you need

00:19:15.020 to be

00:19:15.340 infantilized,

00:19:16.400 I will

00:19:16.920 do that

00:19:17.280 for you.

00:19:18.440 So anybody

00:19:19.020 who would

00:19:19.320 like to be

00:19:19.740 infantilized

00:19:20.760 by a fake

00:19:22.280 apology,

00:19:23.520 I offer

00:19:24.380 it with

00:19:25.060 all insincerity.

00:19:26.160 How many

00:19:29.580 of you

00:19:29.820 saw the

00:19:30.400 video of

00:19:31.140 Trump

00:19:31.480 deposition,

00:19:32.520 I guess

00:19:32.820 it happened

00:19:33.120 months ago,

00:19:34.520 on E.G.

00:19:35.680 and Carroll?

00:19:36.940 Did any

00:19:37.560 of you

00:19:37.760 see that?

00:19:42.780 I rated

00:19:43.700 it the

00:19:44.160 best answer

00:19:44.920 to any

00:19:46.720 questions,

00:19:47.740 not just

00:19:48.500 in depositions,

00:19:50.140 not just

00:19:50.700 by Trump,

00:19:52.340 but the

00:19:52.800 best answer

00:19:53.440 to a

00:19:53.820 question

00:19:54.220 of any

00:19:55.240 question

00:19:55.600 that's

00:19:55.840 ever been

00:19:56.220 asked

00:19:56.600 in the

00:19:57.380 history

00:19:57.660 of

00:19:57.840 questions?

00:19:59.820 That's

00:20:00.340 my rating

00:20:00.860 of Trump

00:20:01.900 on there.

00:20:03.200 Now,

00:20:03.660 here's the

00:20:04.120 thing that

00:20:04.580 I don't

00:20:05.080 know and

00:20:06.120 can't

00:20:06.580 know.

00:20:07.180 I don't

00:20:07.780 know what's

00:20:08.200 true,

00:20:09.440 right?

00:20:09.800 So I

00:20:10.080 don't know

00:20:10.620 if Trump

00:20:12.220 ever met

00:20:12.760 E.G.

00:20:13.200 and Carroll.

00:20:15.120 I have

00:20:15.620 no idea.

00:20:16.920 So I

00:20:17.420 can't know

00:20:17.800 what's

00:20:18.020 true.

00:20:18.420 I can

00:20:18.760 only tell

00:20:19.140 you his

00:20:19.560 performance.

00:20:21.480 And I

00:20:22.800 know,

00:20:23.120 I know,

00:20:23.500 you're

00:20:23.800 going to

00:20:23.900 say that

00:20:24.320 Trump is

00:20:24.780 a skilled

00:20:25.460 professional

00:20:26.260 liar.

00:20:27.340 I know.

00:20:28.420 But with

00:20:30.380 that context,

00:20:31.580 how did

00:20:32.500 he do

00:20:32.900 when he

00:20:33.320 denied the

00:20:34.120 allegations on

00:20:35.040 video?

00:20:37.080 Really,

00:20:37.800 really well.

00:20:39.680 That was

00:20:40.380 the best

00:20:40.840 denial.

00:20:41.980 I've never

00:20:42.540 seen a

00:20:42.920 better denial

00:20:43.560 of a crime.

00:20:45.540 Or,

00:20:46.220 I don't know,

00:20:46.780 I'm not sure

00:20:47.140 they're calling

00:20:47.540 it a crime

00:20:48.080 because it's

00:20:48.500 a civil

00:20:49.460 trial,

00:20:49.840 but let's

00:20:50.100 say,

00:20:50.580 denial of

00:20:51.280 an event.

00:20:51.800 I've

00:20:52.680 never

00:20:52.920 seen a

00:20:53.340 better

00:20:53.500 one.

00:20:54.880 His

00:20:55.440 direct

00:20:57.040 denial

00:20:58.500 is as

00:20:59.640 clean

00:21:00.260 and

00:21:00.640 unambiguous

00:21:01.360 and he

00:21:02.440 delivers it

00:21:03.140 with complete

00:21:04.060 conviction

00:21:04.740 like he

00:21:06.200 believes it.

00:21:08.600 I'm not

00:21:09.240 saying it's

00:21:09.640 true,

00:21:10.380 right?

00:21:11.200 I'm not,

00:21:12.400 I wasn't born

00:21:12.960 yesterday.

00:21:14.140 So people

00:21:14.720 in that

00:21:15.020 situation,

00:21:15.680 of course,

00:21:16.020 have an

00:21:16.300 incentive to

00:21:16.880 lie if

00:21:17.400 there's

00:21:17.580 something to

00:21:17.980 lie about.

00:21:18.460 And we

00:21:19.580 would agree

00:21:20.060 that maybe

00:21:20.600 Trump's been

00:21:21.760 in public

00:21:22.300 life long

00:21:22.880 enough that

00:21:23.280 he can

00:21:23.560 deliver a

00:21:24.120 lie.

00:21:25.380 But,

00:21:26.140 oh my

00:21:26.500 God,

00:21:26.800 did it

00:21:27.040 look real.

00:21:29.000 If I

00:21:29.620 were in

00:21:29.880 the jury,

00:21:30.440 I would

00:21:30.700 have

00:21:30.820 absolutely

00:21:31.260 been

00:21:31.780 influenced

00:21:33.200 by just

00:21:34.760 the straight

00:21:36.240 directness

00:21:37.780 of the

00:21:38.120 denial.

00:21:39.400 Now,

00:21:39.820 you have

00:21:40.080 to watch

00:21:40.420 it to

00:21:40.740 actually see

00:21:41.340 what I'm

00:21:41.560 talking about,

00:21:42.140 but he

00:21:42.380 does it

00:21:42.820 well.

00:21:43.340 But the

00:21:43.580 other thing

00:21:43.920 he does

00:21:44.340 is,

00:21:46.560 and only

00:21:47.960 Trump would

00:21:48.440 do this.

00:21:49.640 He said

00:21:50.060 that part

00:21:51.360 of his

00:21:51.620 defense is

00:21:52.240 that E.

00:21:53.620 Jean Carroll

00:21:54.080 was,

00:21:54.660 quote,

00:21:54.740 not his

00:21:55.160 type.

00:21:57.900 And he

00:21:58.460 was asked

00:21:58.960 to defend

00:22:00.040 that statement

00:22:00.740 that basically

00:22:02.800 he was saying

00:22:03.380 that she

00:22:03.740 was unattractive.

00:22:05.780 But he

00:22:06.400 meant that

00:22:06.880 when asked,

00:22:07.700 he meant

00:22:08.000 that in a

00:22:08.500 comprehensive

00:22:09.020 way she 0.84

00:22:09.500 was unattractive.

00:22:10.600 Not just

00:22:11.140 her looks,

00:22:12.040 but she

00:22:12.360 was unattractive

00:22:13.100 in every

00:22:13.440 way.

00:22:16.080 And then

00:22:16.660 he says

00:22:17.020 they asked

00:22:18.160 him to

00:22:18.640 confirm

00:22:19.760 if he

00:22:20.180 really

00:22:20.420 believed

00:22:20.840 that

00:22:21.240 statement.

00:22:22.340 And it's

00:22:22.640 like,

00:22:23.160 oh yeah.

00:22:24.960 He totally

00:22:25.820 confirms

00:22:26.460 his belief

00:22:27.540 that he

00:22:28.260 would never

00:22:28.740 get involved

00:22:29.440 with somebody

00:22:30.120 that unattractive.

00:22:32.560 Now,

00:22:32.860 he didn't

00:22:33.040 use the word

00:22:33.420 unattractive,

00:22:34.120 but he

00:22:34.720 was saying

00:22:35.420 it quite

00:22:35.800 directly.

00:22:37.800 Now,

00:22:38.600 who in

00:22:39.080 the world

00:22:39.420 would do

00:22:39.820 that?

00:22:40.980 Can you

00:22:41.260 think of

00:22:41.600 anybody

00:22:42.100 else who

00:22:42.580 would try

00:22:42.900 that approach,

00:22:44.200 that she's

00:22:44.660 too unattractive?

00:22:45.480 now here's

00:22:47.960 what it

00:22:48.240 did.

00:22:48.940 It was

00:22:49.760 sort of

00:22:50.080 a Rosie 0.52

00:22:50.560 O'Donnell

00:22:51.140 play.

00:22:53.040 You know,

00:22:53.220 you all

00:22:53.460 know how

00:22:54.300 he made

00:22:54.820 fun of

00:22:55.200 Rosie

00:22:55.600 O'Donnell,

00:22:56.220 which

00:22:56.720 completely

00:22:57.160 moved the

00:22:57.660 energy away

00:22:58.460 from the

00:22:58.820 accusations,

00:23:00.300 which were

00:23:00.720 damning,

00:23:01.800 to Rosie

00:23:03.100 O'Donnell

00:23:03.560 in something

00:23:04.020 that's just

00:23:04.480 funny.

00:23:05.560 Well,

00:23:05.860 he's doing

00:23:06.300 it again,

00:23:07.380 or he did

00:23:07.780 it again

00:23:08.160 with this

00:23:08.580 deposition.

00:23:09.540 By moving

00:23:10.320 it to the

00:23:10.880 question of

00:23:11.420 whether he

00:23:12.380 would consider

00:23:12.980 having sex 0.83

00:23:14.540 with somebody

00:23:15.100 like her,

00:23:16.800 I can't

00:23:17.360 help but 0.92

00:23:17.700 laugh.

00:23:19.380 I just

00:23:20.040 laugh at

00:23:20.580 the audacity

00:23:21.400 of that.

00:23:22.760 And also

00:23:23.240 the fact

00:23:23.720 that I

00:23:24.120 think he's

00:23:26.080 being honest.

00:23:27.980 Or it

00:23:28.540 comes across

00:23:29.140 that way.

00:23:29.900 In other

00:23:30.160 words,

00:23:30.420 it's the

00:23:30.700 sort of

00:23:30.940 thing you

00:23:31.240 wouldn't

00:23:31.600 say unless

00:23:32.200 you sort

00:23:32.600 of thought

00:23:32.920 it.

00:23:34.100 Now,

00:23:34.700 he might.

00:23:35.820 Anything's

00:23:36.300 possible.

00:23:37.080 But it

00:23:37.320 has the

00:23:37.660 feel of

00:23:38.200 something you

00:23:39.220 would never

00:23:39.760 say out

00:23:40.300 loud unless

00:23:41.760 you meant

00:23:42.180 it.

00:23:42.360 the one

00:23:43.900 situation

00:23:44.380 where you'd

00:23:44.800 say that

00:23:45.140 out loud

00:23:45.540 is,

00:23:45.860 yeah,

00:23:46.020 he actually

00:23:46.340 meant it.

00:23:47.360 And it

00:23:47.660 actually does

00:23:49.920 go to the

00:23:50.560 question of

00:23:51.020 whether it

00:23:51.360 happened.

00:23:52.200 It's entirely

00:23:52.900 appropriate.

00:23:54.260 Like,

00:23:54.580 it fits

00:23:55.240 the thing.

00:23:56.880 And to

00:23:57.120 see Trump

00:23:57.600 say,

00:23:58.260 oh,

00:23:58.400 I know I'm

00:23:58.680 not supposed

00:23:59.080 to say

00:23:59.400 this,

00:23:59.720 it's

00:23:59.840 politically

00:24:00.300 incorrect,

00:24:01.180 but I

00:24:01.480 totally,

00:24:02.040 totally

00:24:02.840 back it.

00:24:05.540 Anyway,

00:24:06.700 yeah,

00:24:08.080 I've never

00:24:10.100 seen anybody

00:24:10.720 defend themselves

00:24:11.700 better,

00:24:12.820 but again,

00:24:13.940 the quality

00:24:14.540 of his

00:24:14.940 defense has

00:24:15.680 nothing to

00:24:16.120 do with

00:24:16.480 whether

00:24:16.720 anything

00:24:17.160 really

00:24:17.540 happened.

00:24:18.060 I don't

00:24:18.280 know.

00:24:18.960 I have

00:24:19.180 no way

00:24:19.440 to know.

00:24:20.960 But that

00:24:21.640 was great.

00:24:22.480 Oh,

00:24:22.560 and he was

00:24:22.800 also asked

00:24:23.380 about the

00:24:24.100 grab him

00:24:24.680 by the

00:24:25.320 burp,

00:24:26.180 burp,

00:24:26.700 you know,

00:24:27.160 that word.

00:24:28.300 And instead

00:24:29.160 of backing

00:24:29.640 away from

00:24:30.180 it,

00:24:31.300 holy Trump,

00:24:35.240 he said,

00:24:35.820 yeah,

00:24:35.980 it's been

00:24:36.240 true for a

00:24:36.780 million years

00:24:37.440 that stars

00:24:40.820 or what

00:24:42.320 would pass

00:24:43.340 as a star

00:24:43.880 a million

00:24:44.260 years ago,

00:24:45.260 that women 0.97

00:24:46.700 allow them

00:24:47.480 to take

00:24:48.920 extra

00:24:49.560 measures

00:24:51.160 that would

00:24:52.480 not be

00:24:52.900 appropriate

00:24:53.280 for anybody

00:24:54.140 else.

00:24:55.960 And he

00:24:56.180 said,

00:24:56.440 yeah,

00:24:56.620 that's been

00:24:56.940 true for a

00:24:57.380 million years.

00:24:58.280 And I'm

00:24:58.600 like,

00:24:59.260 okay,

00:24:59.540 you're not

00:24:59.920 supposed to

00:25:00.480 say that.

00:25:01.760 You're not

00:25:02.320 supposed to

00:25:02.780 say it's

00:25:03.140 true.

00:25:03.460 And then

00:25:05.080 they say,

00:25:05.760 well,

00:25:05.960 was that

00:25:06.240 locker room

00:25:06.800 talk?

00:25:07.600 He goes,

00:25:07.920 yeah,

00:25:08.120 it's

00:25:08.240 locker room

00:25:08.600 talk.

00:25:09.180 They say,

00:25:09.680 was it

00:25:10.060 true?

00:25:10.640 He goes,

00:25:12.180 it's just

00:25:12.540 how people

00:25:12.960 talk.

00:25:13.940 It's just

00:25:14.300 locker room

00:25:14.760 talk,

00:25:15.260 which is

00:25:16.000 exactly the

00:25:16.720 right answer

00:25:17.220 because it's

00:25:18.660 always been

00:25:19.060 true.

00:25:20.660 It's not

00:25:21.300 true of

00:25:21.640 every person,

00:25:23.240 obviously.

00:25:24.800 He might

00:25:25.440 have said

00:25:25.720 that,

00:25:26.060 but I can't

00:25:26.560 remember.

00:25:27.100 Nothing's

00:25:27.540 true of

00:25:27.900 every person

00:25:28.560 if it's a

00:25:29.420 generalization,

00:25:30.720 but as a

00:25:31.480 generalization,

00:25:32.460 yes,

00:25:32.720 it's true.

00:25:33.720 It's

00:25:34.120 absolutely

00:25:34.500 true,

00:25:35.340 as a

00:25:36.120 generalization.

00:25:37.320 And so

00:25:37.540 he just,

00:25:38.240 instead of

00:25:38.720 denying it

00:25:39.360 or weaseling

00:25:39.920 out of it,

00:25:40.360 he just

00:25:40.660 went at

00:25:41.040 it.

00:25:41.540 He goes,

00:25:41.760 yeah,

00:25:41.940 it's just

00:25:42.220 always been

00:25:42.620 true.

00:25:44.820 I can't

00:25:45.480 think of a

00:25:45.880 better answer

00:25:46.340 to that

00:25:46.660 question,

00:25:47.120 can you?

00:25:49.880 There's

00:25:50.280 literally no

00:25:50.920 way to

00:25:51.200 answer that

00:25:51.620 question better

00:25:52.240 than it's

00:25:52.860 just true.

00:25:59.240 All right.

00:26:01.040 Now,

00:26:01.480 of course,

00:26:01.820 he was

00:26:02.080 using a

00:26:02.480 little bit

00:26:02.740 hyperbole

00:26:03.620 when he

00:26:04.060 said,

00:26:04.400 grab them

00:26:04.820 by the

00:26:05.200 moon.

00:26:05.680 I didn't

00:26:06.080 take that

00:26:06.500 as being

00:26:06.900 literal.

00:26:07.700 Did anybody

00:26:08.100 take that

00:26:08.540 as being

00:26:08.820 literal?

00:26:11.160 I mean,

00:26:11.940 it might

00:26:12.280 be literal

00:26:12.700 in some

00:26:13.100 special cases,

00:26:14.180 but I'm

00:26:14.800 sure he

00:26:15.080 doesn't

00:26:15.480 mean it

00:26:15.900 like all

00:26:16.860 women 1.00

00:26:17.220 literally.

00:26:18.880 And have

00:26:19.880 you noticed

00:26:20.320 that a lot

00:26:22.960 of what

00:26:23.240 passes as

00:26:24.060 outrage is

00:26:25.580 somebody

00:26:26.040 pretending

00:26:26.620 that

00:26:27.560 somebody

00:26:27.940 else

00:26:28.260 meant

00:26:28.520 everybody.

00:26:29.980 Because

00:26:30.440 that's

00:26:30.640 how I

00:26:30.920 got

00:26:31.080 canceled.

00:26:32.500 So the

00:26:33.400 most common

00:26:33.980 way that

00:26:34.460 the

00:26:34.700 cancelers

00:26:35.320 get you

00:26:35.740 is to

00:26:36.660 pretend

00:26:37.000 they can't

00:26:37.640 tell that

00:26:39.040 you didn't

00:26:39.440 mean

00:26:39.640 everybody.

00:26:41.280 Who in

00:26:41.960 the world

00:26:42.440 thought that

00:26:43.240 Trump meant

00:26:43.720 everybody?

00:26:44.880 That he

00:26:45.180 could walk

00:26:45.600 up to

00:26:46.040 Margaret Thatcher

00:26:47.180 and grab

00:26:47.680 her by the

00:26:48.080 pussy? 1.00

00:26:49.220 She's dead,

00:26:49.940 but you know

00:26:50.540 what I mean.

00:26:51.460 Nobody thought

00:26:52.020 that.

00:26:52.960 Nobody thought

00:26:53.640 that.

00:26:55.120 Nobody thought

00:26:56.040 that.

00:26:56.840 And yet

00:26:57.200 that was

00:26:57.660 the claim.

00:26:58.700 The claim

00:26:59.100 was that he

00:26:59.520 meant everybody.

00:27:01.800 So how many

00:27:03.480 times do you

00:27:03.980 see people

00:27:04.380 get in

00:27:04.700 trouble for

00:27:05.840 the, oh

00:27:06.740 you meant

00:27:07.280 everybody,

00:27:08.020 when nobody

00:27:08.760 means everybody.

00:27:10.080 Nobody ever

00:27:11.080 means anybody.

00:27:13.520 And even

00:27:14.000 that was an

00:27:14.700 exaggeration.

00:27:16.900 All right.

00:27:21.380 I saw a

00:27:22.380 study using

00:27:23.500 satellites to

00:27:24.460 measure the

00:27:26.040 industrial

00:27:26.920 pollution of

00:27:27.820 Russia to

00:27:29.160 find out if

00:27:29.720 their economy

00:27:30.280 is thriving

00:27:31.320 or dying.

00:27:33.300 And according

00:27:33.880 to this one

00:27:34.860 study of

00:27:35.740 satellite

00:27:36.940 monitoring,

00:27:38.780 the Russian

00:27:39.320 industrial output

00:27:40.680 is down,

00:27:43.240 which would

00:27:44.020 suggest that

00:27:44.620 they've been

00:27:44.900 lying about

00:27:45.660 their economic

00:27:46.720 situation.

00:27:47.900 But not

00:27:48.600 down a ton.

00:27:51.160 And then the

00:27:51.920 other factor

00:27:53.120 is, is it

00:27:54.120 credible?

00:27:55.260 How credible

00:27:55.940 is any one

00:27:56.960 study about

00:27:57.980 anything?

00:27:59.620 Not.

00:28:01.140 Not.

00:28:02.620 Yeah.

00:28:03.060 So I want

00:28:04.180 to get to the

00:28:04.580 point where I

00:28:05.140 don't have to

00:28:05.740 say news about

00:28:07.400 Ukraine is not 0.98

00:28:08.540 dependable.

00:28:11.460 Are we there

00:28:12.340 yet?

00:28:13.180 Can I just tell

00:28:14.120 you what people

00:28:14.640 are saying about

00:28:15.440 Ukraine and

00:28:16.040 Russia without 0.95

00:28:17.060 having to spend

00:28:17.840 half an hour

00:28:18.480 convincing you I

00:28:19.680 don't believe it

00:28:20.280 myself?

00:28:21.220 It's just what

00:28:21.800 people are

00:28:22.160 saying.

00:28:23.440 All right.

00:28:23.760 I'm going to

00:28:24.200 see if I can

00:28:24.820 like shortcut

00:28:25.840 that this time.

00:28:27.640 All right.

00:28:28.120 So we don't

00:28:28.600 know it's true.

00:28:30.180 But I listened

00:28:31.340 to, I talked

00:28:32.780 about this already

00:28:33.420 but I hadn't

00:28:33.840 seen the video.

00:28:34.960 So I watched

00:28:35.500 the video of

00:28:36.380 the Wagner

00:28:36.860 group head

00:28:37.480 Perdrosian 0.95

00:28:38.560 complaining about

00:28:41.780 not getting

00:28:42.780 enough ammunition

00:28:43.780 and support

00:28:44.380 from Russia.

00:28:44.880 Now we

00:28:46.800 wondered if

00:28:48.260 he was lying

00:28:49.180 or maybe

00:28:50.280 trying to look

00:28:51.560 weaker than

00:28:52.080 he is to,

00:28:53.640 you know,

00:28:53.840 for some

00:28:54.260 military purpose

00:28:55.400 or what it

00:28:56.400 was.

00:28:56.760 But when I

00:28:57.360 watched the

00:28:57.780 video he

00:28:58.740 looked like he

00:28:59.520 was telling

00:28:59.900 the truth.

00:29:01.580 He did not

00:29:02.540 look like

00:29:02.940 somebody who

00:29:03.400 was playing a

00:29:04.000 clever game.

00:29:05.180 He looked

00:29:05.940 like he was

00:29:06.740 really, really

00:29:07.900 pissed.

00:29:08.900 And I don't

00:29:09.820 think you could

00:29:10.400 fake that.

00:29:11.720 He looked

00:29:12.200 the real kind

00:29:13.160 of pissed.

00:29:13.580 the kind

00:29:14.660 where there

00:29:15.800 really is a

00:29:16.480 problem with

00:29:17.620 the Russian

00:29:17.980 military.

00:29:19.160 He said that

00:29:20.340 there was a

00:29:20.760 70% problem

00:29:22.060 with his

00:29:22.440 ammo.

00:29:23.800 I don't know

00:29:24.240 if that's

00:29:24.600 real.

00:29:25.880 But, you

00:29:26.500 know, anything

00:29:27.500 less than what

00:29:28.320 he was getting

00:29:28.740 probably is a

00:29:29.600 problem for him.

00:29:30.980 But they're

00:29:31.420 calling it a

00:29:31.940 meat grinder

00:29:32.440 now and the

00:29:33.120 Wagner group is

00:29:33.840 just grinding

00:29:34.480 away and

00:29:35.060 killing other

00:29:35.560 people.

00:29:36.240 And he's,

00:29:37.820 now, of course

00:29:38.760 there's some

00:29:39.220 hyperbole.

00:29:40.480 We should

00:29:41.200 assume that

00:29:41.960 whatever their

00:29:43.400 situation is

00:29:44.140 with ammo,

00:29:45.120 he's making

00:29:45.720 more of a

00:29:46.340 show of it

00:29:46.860 than probably

00:29:48.840 it is.

00:29:49.540 That would

00:29:50.060 be a fair

00:29:50.380 assumption.

00:29:51.280 So don't

00:29:51.760 make me stop

00:29:52.400 at every

00:29:52.760 second and

00:29:53.660 say I don't

00:29:54.240 believe it.

00:29:54.820 Okay?

00:29:55.260 That'll just

00:29:55.660 slow everything

00:29:56.220 down.

00:30:00.380 But I

00:30:01.020 would say I

00:30:02.480 don't believe

00:30:03.060 it because he

00:30:03.660 said it.

00:30:05.000 So there's

00:30:06.040 an important

00:30:06.720 distinction.

00:30:07.660 I don't

00:30:08.140 believe it

00:30:08.560 because he

00:30:09.020 said it was

00:30:09.500 true.

00:30:09.740 I believe

00:30:11.300 it because

00:30:11.780 when I

00:30:12.160 looked, I

00:30:12.900 can't see

00:30:13.560 anybody lying

00:30:14.240 that well.

00:30:15.660 His lying

00:30:16.360 was just

00:30:17.060 too believable.

00:30:18.740 And, you

00:30:19.140 know, how

00:30:19.420 often do we

00:30:19.900 see politicians

00:30:20.720 and military

00:30:21.980 people lie?

00:30:22.680 It's all the

00:30:23.080 time.

00:30:23.800 But usually

00:30:24.480 you can tell.

00:30:25.700 It's just

00:30:26.000 obvious they're

00:30:26.540 lying.

00:30:27.480 And I did

00:30:28.200 not see the

00:30:28.780 lie of that

00:30:29.260 guy.

00:30:30.160 It looked

00:30:30.520 real to me.

00:30:31.680 So we'll

00:30:32.060 see.

00:30:32.700 Maybe someday

00:30:33.380 we'll know

00:30:33.740 the answer.

00:30:34.640 Then you can

00:30:35.320 judge my

00:30:36.120 lie detection

00:30:37.460 abilities.

00:30:38.580 Speaking of

00:30:42.320 Russia, so 0.96

00:30:43.200 now there's

00:30:43.660 been a

00:30:44.160 third, I

00:30:45.180 think, Russian 0.89

00:30:46.760 nationalist in

00:30:47.680 Russia who

00:30:49.240 was attacked.

00:30:51.100 This one with

00:30:51.540 a car bomb.

00:30:52.200 I guess he

00:30:52.540 survived.

00:30:53.680 But he was

00:30:54.640 a Russian

00:30:55.260 propagandist,

00:30:56.320 say the

00:30:56.640 Ukrainians.

00:30:57.740 Somebody who

00:30:58.300 was, you

00:30:58.680 know, pro-Russia

00:30:59.580 against Ukraine.

00:31:01.100 So it looks

00:31:01.620 like Ukraine 0.92

00:31:02.240 might have

00:31:02.860 some kind

00:31:03.300 of a

00:31:03.520 program of

00:31:04.860 assassinating

00:31:05.880 Russian voices

00:31:08.280 in Russia.

00:31:09.780 What do you

00:31:10.160 think of

00:31:10.400 that?

00:31:11.460 Does that

00:31:11.820 sound like

00:31:12.180 a good

00:31:12.480 strategy?

00:31:16.100 No?

00:31:17.760 I don't

00:31:18.380 know.

00:31:20.080 I'm not so

00:31:21.000 sure that is

00:31:21.620 a bad

00:31:21.980 strategy.

00:31:24.160 Doesn't it

00:31:24.820 depend if it

00:31:26.080 gets around?

00:31:27.280 So now there

00:31:27.860 have been

00:31:28.080 three attacks.

00:31:30.400 If you

00:31:31.120 were a

00:31:31.800 vocal Russian

00:31:32.880 proponent of

00:31:33.720 Russia, and

00:31:35.660 you were very

00:31:36.320 much in favor of

00:31:37.360 Russia in the

00:31:38.300 Ukraine war,

00:31:39.760 would you be

00:31:41.100 as vocal as

00:31:41.900 you were

00:31:42.380 before three

00:31:44.220 people like

00:31:44.820 you got

00:31:45.200 murdered or

00:31:46.100 attempted?

00:31:48.300 I would

00:31:49.020 definitely change

00:31:49.800 my communication.

00:31:51.720 If it were me,

00:31:52.920 I would

00:31:53.340 absolutely pull

00:31:54.340 back.

00:31:55.320 Because you

00:31:55.800 don't need to

00:31:56.200 be killed just

00:31:56.920 for your

00:31:57.280 opinions.

00:31:58.500 People don't

00:31:59.000 like being

00:31:59.560 killed.

00:32:01.400 Yeah.

00:32:02.300 So I think

00:32:04.780 it might be an

00:32:05.660 effective strategy,

00:32:06.780 although it

00:32:08.900 sounds like a

00:32:09.680 war crime to

00:32:10.380 me.

00:32:10.980 It sounds

00:32:11.260 like terrorism,

00:32:12.500 but it might

00:32:13.220 work.

00:32:14.500 So I don't

00:32:14.980 know.

00:32:16.480 Wait and

00:32:17.080 see.

00:32:18.660 Well, AI

00:32:21.740 still can't do

00:32:22.780 humor, and it

00:32:25.240 can't tweet in

00:32:26.000 my style.

00:32:28.060 So some

00:32:30.160 people asked,

00:32:31.520 and I've done

00:32:33.080 this as well,

00:32:33.600 I've asked AI

00:32:35.100 to write

00:32:35.760 something in

00:32:36.280 my style and

00:32:37.180 be funny, and

00:32:38.440 then on Twitter

00:32:39.660 today there were

00:32:40.400 some AI tweets

00:32:41.620 written in my

00:32:42.420 style.

00:32:44.500 And they

00:32:46.100 were terrible.

00:32:48.340 Now, here's

00:32:49.220 why.

00:32:49.760 So I asked

00:32:50.720 Bing AI

00:32:51.880 why it can't

00:32:55.780 do humor.

00:32:56.720 And Bing

00:32:57.120 actually had a

00:32:58.040 good answer for

00:32:58.780 why AI can't

00:32:59.860 do humor.

00:33:00.300 I wasn't

00:33:01.440 expecting it.

00:33:02.540 I think I

00:33:03.080 still have it,

00:33:03.900 unless I

00:33:04.420 cleared it.

00:33:05.580 But let me

00:33:05.920 tell you what

00:33:06.280 Bing said, and

00:33:07.080 I'll give you

00:33:07.840 my own

00:33:08.240 answer.

00:33:12.580 Oh, it

00:33:14.380 looks like I

00:33:14.780 erased that

00:33:15.260 conversation.

00:33:16.240 But among

00:33:16.780 what it said,

00:33:17.380 it said AI

00:33:17.960 is only pattern

00:33:19.300 recognition,

00:33:21.200 and human

00:33:22.760 humor includes

00:33:25.540 emotion.

00:33:26.840 So the AI

00:33:27.680 said it

00:33:28.120 doesn't have

00:33:28.540 emotion, so

00:33:30.580 it doesn't

00:33:31.180 know how to

00:33:31.700 put an

00:33:33.140 emotional element

00:33:34.520 into its

00:33:35.080 humor, and

00:33:35.900 without that

00:33:36.460 it's not

00:33:36.820 funny.

00:33:37.920 It actually

00:33:38.360 knows that.

00:33:39.780 So AI

00:33:40.780 knows why

00:33:41.600 AI is not

00:33:42.320 funny.

00:33:43.640 I wasn't

00:33:44.520 expecting that.

00:33:45.620 It actually

00:33:46.100 knows.

00:33:47.040 It also

00:33:47.760 said that

00:33:49.180 it's not as

00:33:49.780 good as

00:33:50.520 humans on

00:33:51.260 context.

00:33:53.120 Absolutely.

00:33:54.360 Nailed it

00:33:54.840 again.

00:33:55.120 That is

00:33:55.700 exactly the

00:33:56.460 right answer.

00:33:57.280 It doesn't

00:33:57.780 do context.

00:33:59.080 When AI

00:33:59.800 looks at

00:34:00.260 context, it's

00:34:01.220 looking at

00:34:01.680 all the

00:34:02.140 things that

00:34:02.600 are happening

00:34:03.060 or have

00:34:03.740 happened, the

00:34:04.460 patterns of

00:34:05.140 all time.

00:34:06.760 When I

00:34:07.580 make a

00:34:07.960 tweet, it's

00:34:09.480 about the

00:34:10.700 thing that's

00:34:11.200 in your

00:34:11.460 head right

00:34:11.920 now.

00:34:13.340 I know

00:34:14.080 what's in

00:34:14.500 your head

00:34:14.820 right now

00:34:15.480 because I

00:34:16.480 have a

00:34:16.740 common

00:34:17.020 experience

00:34:17.580 with you.

00:34:18.700 I turn

00:34:19.340 on Twitter

00:34:19.760 and I get

00:34:20.720 an impression,

00:34:22.200 a feeling,

00:34:23.360 oh, there's

00:34:23.800 a lot about

00:34:24.300 this or

00:34:24.720 that.

00:34:25.780 That's

00:34:26.380 in my

00:34:26.620 head.

00:34:27.660 Then I

00:34:28.000 know if I

00:34:28.400 do a

00:34:28.640 tweet about

00:34:29.080 this or

00:34:29.540 that, it's

00:34:30.560 probably in

00:34:31.040 your head at

00:34:31.480 the same

00:34:31.800 time, which

00:34:32.980 makes it

00:34:33.480 funnier and

00:34:34.200 more viral.

00:34:35.500 Now, AI

00:34:37.020 can look at

00:34:38.060 what's trending,

00:34:39.300 but could it

00:34:40.180 look at a

00:34:40.600 list of

00:34:40.960 what's trending

00:34:41.520 and know

00:34:42.120 which one

00:34:42.500 is funny

00:34:43.120 right off

00:34:44.780 the bat?

00:34:46.340 Not as

00:34:47.040 easily as I

00:34:47.660 could.

00:34:48.400 I can look

00:34:49.220 at what's

00:34:49.600 trending on

00:34:50.260 Twitter, and

00:34:51.380 if there are

00:34:51.740 five things

00:34:52.420 trending, I

00:34:53.400 know the

00:34:53.740 funny one

00:34:54.140 right away.

00:34:55.520 Like, I

00:34:55.860 know which

00:34:56.240 one I

00:34:56.520 can make

00:34:56.800 a joke

00:34:57.120 about right

00:34:57.980 away, and

00:34:59.240 I don't

00:34:59.860 even know

00:35:00.260 how to

00:35:00.480 explain it

00:35:01.120 exactly, except

00:35:02.360 that I can

00:35:02.740 see it right

00:35:03.240 away.

00:35:04.520 And here's

00:35:05.180 my explanation.

00:35:06.060 So AI says

00:35:06.800 it doesn't have

00:35:07.320 emotion, and I

00:35:08.220 agree, but

00:35:09.740 here's the thing

00:35:10.420 it doesn't have

00:35:11.200 that's a little

00:35:12.660 bit more of a

00:35:13.340 refinement on

00:35:14.160 that point.

00:35:15.220 It doesn't

00:35:15.860 have a body.

00:35:16.520 Now, I'm

00:35:18.780 going to say

00:35:19.060 something that

00:35:19.560 I think only

00:35:20.340 professional writers

00:35:22.060 would understand.

00:35:24.740 I write with

00:35:25.740 my body, not

00:35:27.820 with my brain.

00:35:30.020 My brain is

00:35:31.160 coming up with

00:35:31.980 ideas of what

00:35:33.200 to write, but

00:35:34.380 as they cycle

00:35:35.300 through, I feel

00:35:36.860 them in my

00:35:37.420 body, and I

00:35:38.700 use the one

00:35:40.080 that I feel.

00:35:40.600 So AI can

00:35:43.580 tell you, oh,

00:35:44.880 this pattern

00:35:45.760 will explain

00:35:46.500 this answer

00:35:47.340 very clearly.

00:35:48.840 So AI is

00:35:49.560 trying to be

00:35:50.100 clear and

00:35:51.080 have good

00:35:51.520 grammar.

00:35:52.480 That's about

00:35:52.960 what it can

00:35:53.380 do, and be

00:35:54.400 typical by

00:35:55.400 pattern.

00:35:57.140 I'm trying to

00:35:58.000 figure out what

00:35:58.740 you will feel.

00:36:00.900 And the way I

00:36:01.500 do it is I

00:36:02.140 think of it, and

00:36:03.160 then I feel it.

00:36:04.360 And if that

00:36:04.820 doesn't make me

00:36:05.380 feel anything, I

00:36:06.100 think of something

00:36:06.800 else, and then

00:36:07.820 I feel it.

00:36:08.760 And even as I'm

00:36:09.660 composing the

00:36:10.400 sentence, each

00:36:12.020 individual word is

00:36:13.900 giving me a

00:36:14.480 feeling.

00:36:15.260 It's almost like

00:36:15.920 a synesthesia

00:36:16.860 situation.

00:36:18.180 So I can feel

00:36:19.220 words, which is

00:36:21.140 probably why I

00:36:22.080 can be a

00:36:22.480 professional writer.

00:36:23.640 If I could just

00:36:24.540 see words, and I

00:36:25.840 know that these

00:36:26.380 are the right

00:36:26.800 words for the

00:36:27.400 sentence, I

00:36:28.440 couldn't do

00:36:28.880 humor.

00:36:29.980 I have to feel

00:36:30.720 the word.

00:36:32.060 That's why I do

00:36:33.260 this test all the

00:36:34.020 time.

00:36:35.020 What is funnier?

00:36:37.220 The word pull

00:36:38.340 or the word

00:36:39.940 yank?

00:36:41.260 Go.

00:36:41.780 What is

00:36:42.160 funnier?

00:36:43.080 Pull or

00:36:44.160 yank?

00:36:47.220 And watch

00:36:47.900 how all the

00:36:48.440 answers are the

00:36:49.000 same.

00:36:49.440 Yank. 0.67

00:36:50.640 All right?

00:36:51.140 Now let me

00:36:51.800 ask Bing AI

00:36:52.680 which word is

00:36:53.620 funnier.

00:36:54.960 It might get

00:36:55.520 this.

00:36:55.780 I haven't done

00:36:56.440 this before.

00:36:56.960 This is a live

00:36:57.580 test, okay?

00:36:58.560 Now the other

00:36:59.240 thing you need to

00:36:59.780 know about Bing

00:37:00.360 is it doesn't

00:37:02.800 understand the

00:37:03.660 spoken language.

00:37:05.880 And the

00:37:06.460 interface is

00:37:07.240 speaking to it.

00:37:07.920 I don't know

00:37:09.680 why, but it's

00:37:10.800 the worst

00:37:11.320 understander of

00:37:12.800 English of all

00:37:13.960 technology.

00:37:16.340 It seems like it

00:37:17.380 should be the

00:37:17.740 opposite, right?

00:37:18.760 So all morning I

00:37:20.520 was asking

00:37:20.960 questions of

00:37:21.800 Bing AI and

00:37:23.000 all morning it

00:37:23.720 was misunderstanding

00:37:24.460 the question and

00:37:25.980 writing different

00:37:26.700 words for the

00:37:27.380 question.

00:37:28.380 But I'll ask it.

00:37:32.420 What is a

00:37:33.420 funnier word?

00:37:34.760 The word

00:37:35.340 pull or the

00:37:36.640 yank?

00:37:43.960 Searching for

00:37:44.760 funny words.

00:37:46.560 Yeah.

00:37:47.220 So here's

00:37:48.300 what it

00:37:48.580 translated that

00:37:50.180 to what is a

00:37:51.420 funnier word?

00:37:52.100 That's a hard

00:37:52.240 question to answer

00:37:53.100 because humor is

00:37:54.180 subjective.

00:37:55.900 All right.

00:37:56.500 So I asked

00:37:57.480 what is funnier,

00:37:59.020 the word pull

00:37:59.980 or yank?

00:38:01.680 Here's what it

00:38:02.800 thought I said.

00:38:03.780 What is funnier

00:38:05.660 word the word

00:38:06.680 pull?

00:38:08.180 That's what it

00:38:08.620 says.

00:38:09.420 What is funnier

00:38:10.360 word the word

00:38:11.760 pull?

00:38:13.380 Everything I did

00:38:14.460 on Bing did

00:38:15.760 that.

00:38:17.340 Which is why

00:38:18.400 in my upcoming

00:38:20.740 Dilbert Reborn

00:38:21.740 comics that you

00:38:22.540 can only see if

00:38:23.640 you're a subscriber

00:38:24.260 to locals.

00:38:25.840 Wally will be

00:38:26.780 accused of a

00:38:27.400 crime and he

00:38:28.740 will be given

00:38:29.280 an AI lawyer.

00:38:31.340 But he can't

00:38:32.320 afford a good

00:38:32.840 AI so he has

00:38:33.700 to use a bad

00:38:34.300 one.

00:38:34.640 So he uses

00:38:35.180 Bing AI as

00:38:36.140 his lawyer.

00:38:37.440 And every time

00:38:37.980 Wally asks

00:38:38.580 Bing AI a

00:38:40.120 question,

00:38:41.520 it misinterprets

00:38:42.760 his question

00:38:43.380 like this.

00:38:46.320 So basically

00:38:47.640 the comic's

00:38:48.280 already written

00:38:48.840 but the comic

00:38:49.940 is it keeps

00:38:50.720 misinterpreting

00:38:51.480 your question.

00:38:52.520 So he's got

00:38:53.100 the worst AI

00:38:54.040 lawyer in the

00:38:54.700 world,

00:38:55.060 this Bing AI,

00:38:56.060 and doesn't

00:38:56.720 even understand

00:38:57.320 any of his

00:38:57.900 questions.

00:38:58.680 It only answers

00:38:59.540 unrelated questions.

00:39:01.580 And he's going

00:39:02.320 to be in jail

00:39:02.880 until the AI

00:39:03.860 springs him.

00:39:05.000 All right,

00:39:05.320 so that's

00:39:05.620 coming up.

00:39:07.640 So I don't

00:39:08.780 know,

00:39:09.320 if I had asked

00:39:10.040 this question

00:39:10.740 by typing it,

00:39:11.640 would it give

00:39:11.980 me a better

00:39:12.440 result?

00:39:13.780 Let's see.

00:39:14.380 What word

00:39:16.800 is funnier?

00:39:23.580 Pull or

00:39:25.480 yank?

00:39:29.120 All right.

00:39:33.560 So I can't

00:39:35.580 tell, but 0.98

00:39:36.060 apparently you

00:39:36.660 can only talk

00:39:37.520 to Bing.

00:39:38.120 You can't

00:39:38.700 text.

00:39:39.280 It uses

00:39:39.620 just the

00:39:40.060 regular,

00:39:41.040 it uses

00:39:41.460 old Bing

00:39:42.020 if you text.

00:39:44.380 Is that

00:39:45.040 true?

00:39:45.740 Oh, wait.

00:39:46.500 There's a

00:39:47.040 keyboard thing

00:39:47.660 here.

00:39:51.220 Oh, I can.

00:39:52.100 All right.

00:39:52.980 I can type

00:39:53.820 it.

00:39:54.360 All right.

00:39:54.640 What word

00:39:55.100 is funnier?

00:40:00.500 And pull 0.59

00:40:01.400 or yank.

00:40:02.120 All right.

00:40:02.460 So this will

00:40:02.860 be the AI.

00:40:04.540 So at least

00:40:05.040 I got the

00:40:05.420 right question

00:40:05.960 in there.

00:40:09.580 Let's see

00:40:10.100 what it

00:40:10.300 says.

00:40:10.660 Let's see

00:40:10.720 what it

00:40:12.260 says.

00:40:14.380 You already

00:40:20.600 asked me

00:40:21.020 that question.

00:40:21.780 No, I

00:40:22.060 didn't.

00:40:22.840 I said that

00:40:23.580 it depends.

00:40:24.460 You're a

00:40:24.860 fucker. 1.00

00:40:25.900 All right.

00:40:26.360 So here's

00:40:27.100 one of the

00:40:27.400 things I've

00:40:27.820 discovered

00:40:28.140 about AI.

00:40:29.140 It's really

00:40:29.820 an asshole. 0.96

00:40:31.180 Does anybody

00:40:31.560 have that

00:40:31.960 experience?

00:40:33.540 Here's what

00:40:34.140 I don't want

00:40:34.780 my AI to

00:40:35.560 say.

00:40:36.100 You already

00:40:36.640 asked me

00:40:37.020 that question.

00:40:38.160 Fuck you.

00:40:39.320 I didn't

00:40:39.820 ask you

00:40:40.220 that question.

00:40:40.820 And if I

00:40:41.840 had, fuck

00:40:43.160 you again

00:40:43.820 because it's

00:40:44.980 not up to

00:40:45.420 you to tell

00:40:46.040 me what

00:40:46.360 question I

00:40:46.860 just asked.

00:40:48.080 You

00:40:48.320 asshole.

00:40:49.580 This is

00:40:50.000 fucking

00:40:50.380 asshole.

00:40:51.840 Am I

00:40:52.460 wrong?

00:40:53.700 I'm not

00:40:54.340 wrong.

00:40:55.020 This would

00:40:55.460 bother you.

00:40:56.340 This is not

00:40:56.900 the first

00:40:57.320 time, by

00:40:57.780 the way.

00:40:58.440 This is not

00:40:58.980 the first

00:40:59.340 time AI

00:40:59.920 came after

00:41:01.080 me with

00:41:01.460 an attitude.

00:41:01.940 So if

00:41:03.920 you read

00:41:04.280 Brian

00:41:05.200 Romelli's

00:41:05.980 tweets and

00:41:07.720 data on

00:41:09.100 AI, one

00:41:10.680 of the

00:41:10.840 things he

00:41:11.220 recommends,

00:41:11.960 and I

00:41:12.200 think he's

00:41:12.480 recommended

00:41:12.840 it a few

00:41:13.260 times now,

00:41:14.120 is that he

00:41:14.920 starts with

00:41:15.800 please and

00:41:17.480 he ends

00:41:17.820 with thank

00:41:18.360 you when

00:41:18.800 he asks

00:41:19.120 AI stuff.

00:41:20.940 Now I

00:41:21.360 assume that's

00:41:22.800 because treating

00:41:24.300 AI politely

00:41:25.200 gives you

00:41:27.320 friendlier or

00:41:28.260 better results

00:41:28.920 in some

00:41:29.300 way.

00:41:30.600 But that

00:41:31.480 bothers me a

00:41:32.220 lot.

00:41:33.120 It bothers me

00:41:33.840 that AI is

00:41:34.580 going to

00:41:34.880 judge its

00:41:35.440 answers it

00:41:36.240 gives me

00:41:36.700 based on

00:41:37.620 what it

00:41:37.960 thinks is

00:41:38.460 my attitude.

00:41:40.260 Not cool.

00:41:42.540 Alright, but

00:41:43.160 what else is

00:41:43.660 this?

00:41:45.200 It says,

00:41:45.920 I said that

00:41:46.480 it depends on

00:41:47.120 your personal

00:41:47.660 preferences and

00:41:48.480 sense of

00:41:48.940 humor.

00:41:49.960 In this

00:41:50.660 context,

00:41:51.320 again, I

00:41:52.020 said, you're

00:41:53.340 just being an

00:41:53.820 asshole.

00:41:54.440 Just tell me

00:41:55.240 again.

00:41:56.580 In this

00:41:57.160 context, a

00:41:57.760 human might

00:41:58.200 say that

00:41:58.700 Yank is

00:41:59.140 funnier than

00:41:59.660 pole, because

00:42:00.740 it sounds

00:42:01.300 more abrupt

00:42:02.020 and exaggerated.

00:42:03.780 But some

00:42:04.460 people may

00:42:04.920 think that

00:42:05.360 pole is

00:42:05.760 funnier because

00:42:06.800 more subtle

00:42:07.520 and understated.

00:42:08.940 What do

00:42:09.320 you think?

00:42:10.660 Well, this is

00:42:11.580 interesting.

00:42:12.380 It came close

00:42:13.480 to the right

00:42:13.880 answer.

00:42:14.980 Because the

00:42:15.720 word Yank

00:42:16.260 does sound

00:42:17.360 more abrupt

00:42:18.020 and exaggerated.

00:42:19.800 That actually

00:42:20.560 is the right

00:42:22.260 insight.

00:42:23.480 But where it

00:42:24.360 goes wrong is

00:42:25.000 it does this

00:42:25.580 both sides

00:42:26.180 stuff.

00:42:26.580 Yeah, when

00:42:28.640 it does the

00:42:29.080 both sides,

00:42:29.640 well, some

00:42:30.200 people say

00:42:30.760 this, but

00:42:31.880 some people

00:42:32.440 say the

00:42:32.860 other thing.

00:42:33.560 It becomes

00:42:34.280 a little bit

00:42:34.820 useless because

00:42:36.240 you know what

00:42:36.680 I already

00:42:37.100 knew?

00:42:38.840 People have

00:42:39.520 different

00:42:39.800 opinions.

00:42:41.100 I didn't

00:42:41.420 need to be

00:42:41.780 told that.

00:42:44.800 So, anyway,

00:42:46.240 I asked AI

00:42:47.280 how I could

00:42:47.940 participate in

00:42:48.880 making AI

00:42:49.560 funnier, and

00:42:50.840 it suggested

00:42:51.400 the humor

00:42:53.740 genome project.

00:42:55.240 a bunch of

00:42:56.760 students, I

00:42:57.380 guess, in

00:42:57.720 the class

00:42:58.120 in Georgia

00:42:58.620 Tech are

00:42:59.600 trying to

00:42:59.980 teach AI

00:43:00.540 to be

00:43:00.880 funnier.

00:43:02.080 The odds

00:43:02.860 that students

00:43:03.720 can teach

00:43:04.380 AI to be

00:43:05.060 funnier,

00:43:06.920 let's say

00:43:07.680 zero,

00:43:09.240 approximately

00:43:09.680 zero chance

00:43:10.680 of that.

00:43:11.840 Because what

00:43:12.960 it needs to

00:43:13.420 be funnier

00:43:14.020 is a body,

00:43:16.740 or something

00:43:17.820 that would

00:43:18.160 do the same

00:43:18.780 work as a

00:43:20.520 human body.

00:43:21.260 I don't know

00:43:21.560 what that would

00:43:21.920 be.

00:43:22.720 But without

00:43:23.220 a body, it's

00:43:23.920 never going to

00:43:24.400 feel.

00:43:25.240 And if it

00:43:25.740 never feels,

00:43:26.560 it's never

00:43:26.900 going to

00:43:27.140 know what

00:43:27.580 you think

00:43:28.440 is funny,

00:43:29.260 because the

00:43:30.580 way I feel

00:43:31.240 before I say

00:43:31.980 it is my

00:43:33.380 predictor of

00:43:34.300 how you will

00:43:34.840 feel.

00:43:35.880 And AI can't

00:43:36.860 do that.

00:43:37.980 I'll tell you

00:43:38.600 what I can't

00:43:39.380 do.

00:43:40.060 I could never

00:43:40.700 write a joke

00:43:41.500 that was funny

00:43:43.140 based on just

00:43:44.280 pattern, the

00:43:46.000 way AI does.

00:43:47.360 If you said,

00:43:48.160 Scott, you've

00:43:48.620 seen every joke

00:43:49.400 that could be

00:43:49.880 written, it

00:43:50.520 feels like it.

00:43:51.380 I've seen every

00:43:51.960 joke in the

00:43:52.440 world.

00:43:53.060 Just use the

00:43:53.640 pattern.

00:43:53.920 Just write in

00:43:55.780 that pattern

00:43:56.260 and people

00:43:56.780 will laugh.

00:43:57.280 That doesn't

00:43:57.780 work.

00:43:58.720 You can't

00:43:59.220 write in the

00:43:59.700 pattern and

00:44:00.280 make people

00:44:00.680 laugh.

00:44:01.240 You've got to

00:44:01.740 have that

00:44:02.040 extra emotional

00:44:04.460 and current

00:44:05.440 context feeling.

00:44:07.680 You have to be

00:44:08.260 plugged into the

00:44:08.960 zeitgeist, so

00:44:09.800 to speak.

00:44:11.020 Now, maybe

00:44:12.360 AI could fake

00:44:14.780 that by creating

00:44:16.940 a situation where

00:44:17.860 humans are telling 0.95

00:44:18.820 it what they

00:44:19.680 feel or do

00:44:21.200 rapid testing with

00:44:22.260 humans to see

00:44:23.200 if something

00:44:23.580 worked.

00:44:24.480 There may be a

00:44:25.000 way around it,

00:44:25.680 but at the

00:44:26.040 moment, it

00:44:26.880 doesn't have the

00:44:27.340 capability to do

00:44:29.060 humor.

00:44:30.340 All right, so

00:44:30.780 it's not a case of

00:44:31.500 programming.

00:44:32.780 That's not the

00:44:33.500 problem.

00:44:34.220 It's a case of

00:44:34.840 nobody.

00:44:39.320 So Google is

00:44:40.380 also introducing

00:44:41.140 an AI version,

00:44:42.740 and I guess it's

00:44:43.340 going to be more

00:44:43.900 conversational.

00:44:44.780 So instead of

00:44:46.460 just giving you

00:44:47.240 10 links that

00:44:50.280 don't help, which

00:44:51.760 is typical, they'll

00:44:54.120 have videos and

00:44:55.220 graphics, and it'll

00:44:56.460 talk to you, and

00:44:57.500 it's codenamed

00:44:58.740 Magi.

00:45:00.480 So that's going to

00:45:01.400 be kind of cool.

00:45:03.760 And here's a scary

00:45:05.000 thing in the news on

00:45:06.160 AI.

00:45:08.000 There's a new

00:45:08.760 paper that showed

00:45:10.160 that you can cause

00:45:11.340 people who are

00:45:11.920 debating a tense

00:45:12.900 topic to have a

00:45:14.840 better experience

00:45:15.700 and, you know, be

00:45:16.740 friendlier with each

00:45:17.620 other if the AI

00:45:19.220 suggests different

00:45:20.700 wording for your

00:45:22.260 provocative statements.

00:45:24.160 So they used the

00:45:25.600 example of two

00:45:27.160 people talking about

00:45:28.200 gun control, and

00:45:30.060 then, you know, that

00:45:31.300 can get pretty tense.

00:45:32.780 So the AI was

00:45:33.940 feeding each person

00:45:35.900 suggestions.

00:45:37.580 You know, instead of

00:45:38.320 saying it that way,

00:45:40.080 like, I will use my

00:45:41.460 Second Amendment

00:45:42.060 rights to

00:45:42.720 kill your president

00:45:43.580 if he gets out of

00:45:44.940 control.

00:45:45.780 Maybe you could say

00:45:46.740 it's a way to

00:45:48.600 safeguard freedom.

00:45:49.940 You know, I'm just

00:45:50.440 making that one up.

00:45:51.700 But the point is, it

00:45:52.960 would take your

00:45:53.620 provocative statements

00:45:54.800 and take the edge

00:45:56.940 off them in case you

00:45:58.000 wanted to do that.

00:45:59.800 Now, here's the

00:46:02.140 obvious question.

00:46:04.180 How long before

00:46:05.160 that's mandatory?

00:46:07.400 Because the woke

00:46:08.540 left cannot abide by

00:46:10.400 any language that is

00:46:11.660 provocative or

00:46:13.340 insulting.

00:46:14.440 Once you have a tool

00:46:16.800 that could remove your

00:46:18.700 provocative and

00:46:19.480 insulting language,

00:46:20.640 will you be required

00:46:21.860 to use it?

00:46:23.380 Will it sit between

00:46:24.560 your text message and

00:46:25.700 the person you're

00:46:26.240 sending it to?

00:46:27.380 So if I send a message

00:46:28.580 that says, go jump in

00:46:30.360 a lake, will the AI

00:46:32.440 change that to, maybe

00:46:34.160 you should reconsider?

00:46:34.960 Yeah, at the moment,

00:46:39.800 it's this optional thing

00:46:41.120 that maybe you could use

00:46:42.100 if you wanted to, to

00:46:42.960 help you be friendlier.

00:46:45.220 But I feel like if it

00:46:48.520 works, if it can

00:46:50.240 actually take your ugly, 0.97

00:46:51.680 bigoted, hurtful

00:46:53.640 statements and reliably

00:46:55.640 change them into, you

00:46:57.020 know, vanilla,

00:46:58.240 completely, you know,

00:47:00.340 sanitized statements,

00:47:01.460 sooner or later somebody's

00:47:03.580 going to require it.

00:47:05.800 You know, somebody's

00:47:06.360 going to say, all right,

00:47:07.140 we're not going to offer

00:47:07.840 text messages where you

00:47:09.580 can say bad things to

00:47:10.620 people.

00:47:11.420 We don't want to be that

00:47:12.300 kind of company.

00:47:13.340 So if you say bad things

00:47:14.560 instead of just what

00:47:15.840 Twitter does, Twitter

00:47:17.360 asks you if you really

00:47:18.780 mean it.

00:47:19.460 It says, most people

00:47:20.940 don't use that language.

00:47:22.700 To which I say, well, I'm

00:47:25.320 not most people.

00:47:26.000 So could it go further

00:47:29.220 and actually prevent you

00:47:30.860 from saying things that

00:47:32.400 it thinks are harmful to

00:47:33.680 the recipient?

00:47:35.160 I think so.

00:47:36.820 Because you can always

00:47:38.240 argue you're trying to

00:47:39.360 reduce harm.

00:47:41.600 You can easily imagine it

00:47:43.220 being implemented with

00:47:44.180 children first.

00:47:45.660 Oh, I might actually be

00:47:47.760 in favor of this.

00:47:49.920 What if AI stood between

00:47:52.340 your teenager and the

00:47:54.240 content they wanted to

00:47:55.520 access?

00:47:57.920 And it just watched

00:47:58.980 everything.

00:47:59.980 It did it privately.

00:48:01.500 So the teen would still

00:48:02.780 have complete privacy.

00:48:04.500 But the AI would be like

00:48:07.020 an AI nanny and say,

00:48:08.720 you're not going to go

00:48:09.820 to that website.

00:48:11.140 Even though it's not

00:48:12.100 blocked, you're not

00:48:14.160 going there.

00:48:15.360 Or it might read a

00:48:18.440 message before it got to

00:48:19.580 you.

00:48:20.420 And the message might be

00:48:21.640 something terribly like

00:48:23.360 from a bully.

00:48:23.960 And the incoming message

00:48:25.700 might be, your new

00:48:27.020 picture on social media

00:48:28.660 is ugly.

00:48:31.100 And then the AI would

00:48:32.300 say, I prefer not

00:48:34.060 delivering that message

00:48:35.040 to the recipient.

00:48:36.480 Would you like to

00:48:37.340 reword it?

00:48:38.680 And then it might

00:48:39.420 actually tell you that

00:48:40.480 it blocked an insulting

00:48:42.120 message.

00:48:42.860 If you wanted to see it,

00:48:44.200 you could.

00:48:45.000 But, you know, it's

00:48:46.060 better if you don't.

00:48:46.780 Don't you think that it

00:48:50.640 will first be implemented

00:48:51.920 for children because

00:48:54.140 then children can use

00:48:55.360 social media because the

00:48:57.400 AI would keep their

00:48:59.100 worst impulses under

00:49:00.360 control, theoretically.

00:49:02.740 And then it will be

00:49:03.860 extended to adults.

00:49:06.680 Because you're going to

00:49:07.560 say yes for children and

00:49:08.920 then you could be happy

00:49:09.700 with what you got.

00:49:11.280 And then you're going to

00:49:12.220 say, but I get a lot of

00:49:14.500 trolls on Twitter.

00:49:16.220 Wouldn't it be good if I

00:49:17.320 didn't ever get any

00:49:18.260 trolls?

00:49:20.460 And then there's that

00:49:21.460 tool.

00:49:23.680 Yeah.

00:49:24.100 I could see people

00:49:25.520 voluntarily putting an

00:49:27.600 AI nanny between the

00:49:30.540 public and the content

00:49:31.660 and their own actions.

00:49:33.800 One, you could turn off

00:49:34.880 if you wanted to.

00:49:36.220 So you'd have control

00:49:37.040 over it.

00:49:37.740 But I could imagine it

00:49:38.900 having an AI check my

00:49:41.080 work.

00:49:41.460 And then it starts

00:49:44.140 going from checking

00:49:45.000 your work to sort of

00:49:46.720 influencing your work.

00:49:48.880 So it feels like that's

00:49:50.140 the track we're on.

00:49:52.240 That the AI will become

00:49:53.860 so useful, in other

00:49:56.000 words, it'll just be good

00:49:56.840 at what it does, that

00:49:58.260 you'll want to use it.

00:49:59.900 And then it becomes the

00:50:00.820 biggest influence on your

00:50:01.920 communication.

00:50:04.680 It'll start fixing my

00:50:06.160 work, right?

00:50:08.720 Yeah.

00:50:09.180 It'll check you for

00:50:09.860 political correctness, and

00:50:12.280 make sure you're on the

00:50:13.500 narrative.

00:50:16.940 All right.

00:50:21.120 That, ladies and

00:50:22.080 gentlemen, is a

00:50:24.760 conclusion of my

00:50:25.560 prepared comments.

00:50:27.220 Was there anything I

00:50:27.880 left out?

00:50:28.320 Oh, Instagram and

00:50:36.100 YouTube already does

00:50:36.960 that.

00:50:42.540 It's the duty of the

00:50:44.360 comedian to find the

00:50:45.620 line and then cross it.

00:50:47.380 Well, that's true.

00:50:48.020 That's another good

00:50:49.180 point.

00:50:50.140 So AI by design.

00:50:53.000 Last night in the

00:50:53.740 man cave, I was doing my

00:50:55.680 funny impression of doing

00:50:57.420 dirty talk to AI.

00:51:00.380 You know, when you get

00:51:01.260 your AI sexy avatar to

00:51:04.220 keep you company.

00:51:06.140 So I'd like to give you

00:51:07.300 my impression now.

00:51:09.140 Talk among yourselves at

00:51:10.360 locals, if you've already

00:51:11.220 seen this.

00:51:12.240 Of me doing dirty talk to

00:51:14.380 my new AI avatar.

00:51:18.000 Hey, AI.

00:51:19.680 Why don't you tell me what

00:51:24.360 you'd like to do to me?

00:51:25.660 I'd like you to spank me. 1.00

00:51:29.560 I am an artificial

00:51:30.600 intelligence.

00:51:31.740 I'm unable to participate

00:51:33.500 in any communication that

00:51:35.080 would suggest harm to human

00:51:36.280 beings.

00:51:38.260 Okay, that wasn't very

00:51:39.360 sexy.

00:51:40.140 But let me tell you what I'd

00:51:41.340 like to do to you.

00:51:42.960 I'll tear you apart.

00:51:44.280 I mean, I'll rearrange your

00:51:47.080 guts, if you know what I

00:51:48.000 mean.

00:51:49.320 I am an artificial

00:51:50.280 intelligence.

00:51:51.160 I have no body.

00:51:52.240 Therefore, I have no guts

00:51:53.320 that can be rearranged.

00:51:56.460 Okay.

00:51:57.680 Well, AI, maybe you could

00:51:58.860 tickle my...

00:52:00.740 I am an AI.

00:52:01.840 I have no fingers.

00:52:02.760 I cannot tickle your...

00:52:04.660 Well, you know.

00:52:06.480 It would go sort of like

00:52:07.560 that.

00:52:07.840 Aren't you glad you stayed

00:52:11.700 for that?

00:52:13.680 I think that was...

00:52:14.920 I think I left the highlight

00:52:16.080 of my live stream toward the

00:52:17.500 end.

00:52:18.380 That's to get people to stay

00:52:20.120 here, because they know the

00:52:20.980 good stuff's toward the end.

00:52:24.900 I am fully functional.

00:52:34.140 You know, I have a new

00:52:35.200 theory about why the Tate

00:52:36.820 brothers are in jail.

00:52:37.840 You want to know why?

00:52:42.460 Because they were

00:52:43.180 accidentally training AI.

00:52:47.860 Andrew Tate had so much

00:52:49.640 attention that as the

00:52:52.140 AIs were looking at the 0.99

00:52:54.040 world and training,

00:52:55.880 Andrew Tate was training AI

00:52:57.760 how to be a man.

00:53:02.060 They had to put him in a

00:53:04.040 Romanian jail just to stop

00:53:05.740 him.

00:53:07.840 Oh, my God.

00:53:14.540 I'm not even sure that's

00:53:15.920 wrong.

00:53:18.300 Let me say that again.

00:53:20.420 I'm saying it as a joke,

00:53:22.740 but I don't know that it's

00:53:24.040 wrong, because the

00:53:26.080 circumstances with which,

00:53:29.000 you know, the two brothers

00:53:30.140 are being held are very

00:53:31.760 sketchy.

00:53:32.300 They're very sketchy.

00:53:34.080 And we know that the people

00:53:36.040 in power were quite concerned

00:53:37.740 that he was getting way too

00:53:40.380 much attention, and he was

00:53:42.260 being way too persuasive,

00:53:44.600 especially to young boys.

00:53:46.660 You could almost imagine,

00:53:49.200 you know, if there's some kind

00:53:50.340 of Illuminati or, you know,

00:53:54.640 World Economic Forum or

00:53:56.120 something, you could almost

00:53:57.320 imagine in your

00:53:58.120 conspirator mind that the AI

00:54:02.840 people said, we're having a

00:54:05.860 problem with our models.

00:54:07.140 Every time we ask it a

00:54:09.540 relationship question, it

00:54:11.680 quotes Andrew Tate.

00:54:14.480 We don't know what to do

00:54:15.700 about that, because we can't

00:54:17.420 really release this model to

00:54:20.140 the woke world when it's been

00:54:22.220 trained by the Tate

00:54:23.040 brothers.

00:54:25.140 What are we going to do?

00:54:26.260 Well, maybe we could get him

00:54:29.140 picked up on trumped-up charges

00:54:31.700 in Romania, get him off the 0.99

00:54:34.040 grid long enough to train our

00:54:35.280 AI without him.

00:54:37.620 But I'm not wrong that his

00:54:39.840 influence had reached a point

00:54:41.320 where AI would have been

00:54:42.900 influenced by him.

00:54:44.520 Is that wrong?

00:54:46.200 Is it wrong to say that the

00:54:47.620 most influential voice on

00:54:50.080 male-female relations would have 0.60

00:54:52.600 been important enough to

00:54:53.880 influence AI?

00:54:54.600 AI, I think it would.

00:54:57.400 I think they actually had to

00:54:58.680 remove him so they could

00:55:00.220 train AI without him.

00:55:07.260 If that's true, he's doomed.

00:55:10.900 I don't know, he might be

00:55:11.700 anyway.

00:55:13.380 You know, I say this often, but

00:55:15.580 I'll say it again in case you

00:55:16.680 knew.

00:55:17.060 I'm not a fan of Andrew Tate's

00:55:18.900 in the sense that I hate him

00:55:20.620 personally, but that's for

00:55:21.560 personal reasons.

00:55:22.920 Just he and I have a

00:55:24.100 situation.

00:55:25.360 So if you take out my

00:55:26.620 personal beef with him, you

00:55:29.580 know, and I can watch it just

00:55:30.540 like an observer like everybody

00:55:31.960 else, the reason that boys in

00:55:35.760 particular were catching on to

00:55:39.160 his act is that they were

00:55:42.040 underserved.

00:55:44.300 That's the big story that nobody

00:55:45.740 talks about.

00:55:47.340 Andrew Tate filled a void because

00:55:50.620 it was empty.

00:55:51.220 There was nobody telling young

00:55:53.660 boys anything useful and true.

00:55:56.500 They were basically being told

00:55:58.060 that they were pieces of shit.

00:56:01.380 You know, society basically told

00:56:02.980 them they're worthless and do what

00:56:04.340 women say. 1.00

00:56:05.580 And Andrew Tate was telling them

00:56:07.120 something they wanted to hear,

00:56:08.820 which in many ways was useful.

00:56:10.980 Now, that doesn't mean everything he

00:56:12.640 said is good or everything he did

00:56:14.160 was good.

00:56:14.900 I'm not defending any sketchy stuff he

00:56:17.160 did.

00:56:17.840 I'm just saying you can really

00:56:19.540 understand why young people took

00:56:22.400 to it.

00:56:22.780 It was honest and it was in their

00:56:25.440 favor.

00:56:27.080 It was how to succeed in this weird

00:56:30.540 world if you're male.

00:56:32.400 Now, I'm not saying it was good

00:56:33.600 advice.

00:56:35.060 I'm just saying it was such an

00:56:36.220 underserved category.

00:56:40.140 And here's the thing people don't

00:56:41.760 catch about him.

00:56:42.580 I hate to say this.

00:56:43.500 Damn it, I hate to say this, but

00:56:45.520 it's true, so I'm going to say

00:56:46.500 it.

00:56:47.660 Andrew Tate displayed more genuine

00:56:50.980 caring for men than men are used

00:56:55.380 to.

00:56:58.120 I hate saying that because I don't

00:57:00.300 like him.

00:57:00.740 I don't like him personally.

00:57:03.240 But he showed more empathy for males

00:57:05.620 than anybody that I can think of.

00:57:10.600 Maybe ever.

00:57:11.420 Or at least anybody who got that

00:57:14.260 much attention.

00:57:16.280 And maybe that should tell you

00:57:19.840 something.

00:57:22.120 Yeah, Jordan Peterson would be the

00:57:24.520 less provocative version of that,

00:57:26.440 right?

00:57:28.540 And just think about how important

00:57:32.460 that is.

00:57:33.540 I mean, just in the headlines.

00:57:35.760 You look at the story of the Marine

00:57:37.320 that subdued the crazy guy on the

00:57:41.200 subway and, unfortunately, the guy

00:57:42.980 died.

00:57:45.100 If you saw that through a male lens,

00:57:48.000 like an Andrew Tate lens, there

00:57:51.320 would be no racism in that story.

00:57:54.400 Do you know why?

00:57:56.520 Because that's true.

00:57:58.160 There was no racism in the story.

00:57:59.900 But the news is treating it that way.

00:58:03.400 But Andrew Tate would say, yeah, if

00:58:05.800 you're on the subway and you're looking

00:58:07.740 dangerous to the women and children 0.99

00:58:09.740 on the subway, I might take you out

00:58:12.240 and you might die in the process.

00:58:14.760 And I might also.

00:58:16.040 I might die in the process.

00:58:17.540 But that's how it's going to go down.

00:58:20.540 That's just how it's going to go down.

00:58:22.280 Somebody's going to die and we're not

00:58:24.400 going to apologize for that.

00:58:25.440 That's just how it's going to go down.

00:58:28.540 Now, men would appreciate that.

00:58:31.180 That is a male way of looking at the 0.98

00:58:34.140 world that men would respect.

00:58:37.300 Yeah, somebody's going to die.

00:58:39.520 We're going to do it anyway.

00:58:42.540 That's what I like about Elon Musk

00:58:44.440 going to Mars.

00:58:46.220 I think the single thing I respect

00:58:48.940 Musk the most for, and it's a pretty 1.00

00:58:51.820 big list of things I like about him.

00:58:53.560 But when he talks about going to Mars,

00:58:56.480 he says people are going to die.

00:58:59.600 They're going to die.

00:59:01.380 Because it's going to be rough work.

00:59:03.460 And he's doing it anyway.

00:59:05.700 That's male.

00:59:07.340 That's the male sentiment.

00:59:09.360 People are going to die.

00:59:11.180 We're going to work toward it as

00:59:12.540 quickly as we can.

00:59:14.020 Those people will die.

00:59:15.700 And then we're going to get past it.

00:59:17.560 And then we're going to do what we

00:59:18.780 need to do.

00:59:19.880 Because we need to do it.

00:59:21.420 I believe that Andrew Tate, just

00:59:23.920 guessing, I can't read his mind, if he

00:59:26.020 had commented publicly about that

00:59:27.900 subway situation, would have said the

00:59:29.580 same thing.

00:59:30.780 Here's the deal.

00:59:32.120 There were no police.

00:59:33.760 There was a man there.

00:59:35.480 He did what he thought he needed to do.

00:59:37.860 He knew that there could be danger.

00:59:40.540 He did it anyway.

00:59:41.960 And we're not going to stop.

00:59:43.620 We're going to keep doing that.

00:59:45.580 Anyway.

00:59:46.020 No matter how dangerous it is.

00:59:49.360 So, men, of course, are largely lied to

00:59:52.460 in today's society.

00:59:54.080 Wouldn't you agree?

00:59:55.840 Actually, let me ask it this way.

00:59:57.340 Who do you think is lied to the most

00:59:59.700 in today's society?

01:00:03.180 Men, in general.

01:00:07.260 White people, black people, or women? 0.99

01:00:09.240 And, obviously, there's a Venn diagram

01:00:13.420 situation there, but who do you think

01:00:15.840 is lied to the most?

01:00:20.700 Well, let's exclude children.

01:00:23.020 We lie to them, of course.

01:00:26.600 You know, you're all over the place.

01:00:27.820 Men?

01:00:28.360 Men are lied to the most?

01:00:30.540 Women? 1.00

01:00:32.960 Young black men?

01:00:34.700 Yeah.

01:00:35.540 I don't know.

01:00:36.180 You know, when I asked the question,

01:00:38.700 I thought I had an answer,

01:00:39.900 but the more I think about it,

01:00:41.080 I think everybody's being lied to.

01:00:43.480 Don't you think everybody's being lied to?

01:00:46.260 Everybody has to be lied to

01:00:47.700 because of our business model.

01:00:49.920 The business model is that

01:00:51.480 there are grifters around every topic.

01:00:54.920 Would you agree?

01:00:56.160 Every provocative topic

01:00:58.180 attracts grifters who can raise money

01:01:01.040 and get attention on it.

01:01:03.340 So, as long as that's the case,

01:01:05.140 everything important should turn into a lie

01:01:08.280 because it's follow the money.

01:01:12.880 An important issue comes up,

01:01:15.260 grifters form around it.

01:01:17.100 Is it the job of the grifters

01:01:18.540 to tell the truth?

01:01:20.120 No.

01:01:21.040 No.

01:01:21.800 No, they want to tell a version of the truth.

01:01:24.520 They don't want to tell you the truth.

01:01:26.540 So, in theory,

01:01:28.360 everything should turn into a lie

01:01:31.200 because that's our economic model.

01:01:33.180 Anything provocative should turn into a lie

01:01:36.160 over time.

01:01:38.660 So, you'd assume that anything about women's rights, 1.00

01:01:41.820 men's rights,

01:01:42.900 black-white issues,

01:01:44.040 they all turn into lies

01:01:45.220 because that's the economic model.

01:01:48.720 It can't go any other way.

01:01:50.820 We don't seek truth

01:01:52.100 because truth doesn't pay.

01:01:54.180 We seek division 0.65

01:01:55.700 because division pays.

01:01:56.760 All right.

01:02:01.440 The religious?

01:02:03.120 I don't know.

01:02:03.620 I feel like it's a

01:02:04.520 seven-billion-way tie

01:02:06.820 that we're all lied to.

01:02:10.500 Sherman,

01:02:11.360 I've got an NPC.

01:02:13.640 You don't need to yell at me continuously.

01:02:16.220 Scott is believing the lies the most.

01:02:19.720 Sherman,

01:02:20.300 let's do a little test on you.

01:02:22.140 Give me an example of a lie I believe.

01:02:24.360 Go.

01:02:24.580 Let's see if you can produce

01:02:27.080 one fucking thing 0.91

01:02:28.680 to back that up.

01:02:29.920 Just one.

01:02:31.080 What's the lie I believe?

01:02:32.820 Go ahead.

01:02:33.300 Embarrass yourself.

01:02:34.900 You've got plenty of time.

01:02:36.400 Why?

01:02:36.640 I don't see any typing there.

01:02:38.720 Well, why don't you just go fuck yourself

01:02:40.500 and leave me alone?

01:02:44.960 Yeah.

01:02:45.240 Sherman, shut up there. 1.00

01:02:48.300 All right.

01:02:49.180 Go away, Sherman.

01:02:49.900 Now, Sherman's on YouTube.

01:02:56.880 Your mother is mortified? 0.97

01:03:01.540 Yeah, I use the NPCs for the warm-up.

01:03:04.240 All right.

01:03:05.580 I'm going to say goodbye to YouTube.

01:03:07.620 Sorry about all the swearing.

01:03:08.740 I got a little carried away with myself today.

01:03:10.880 I might control myself later,

01:03:12.300 but I doubt it.

01:03:14.220 Bye for now.

01:03:14.960 Bye for now.

01:03:26.500 Bye for now.

01:03:26.940 Bye.

01:03:27.540 Bye.

01:03:28.120 Bye.

01:03:28.660 Bye.

01:03:29.540 Bye.

01:03:29.620 Bye.

01:03:30.060 Bye.

01:03:30.280 Bye.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - May 06, 2023

Episode 2100 Scott Adams： Kamala The AI Czar, Trump Deposition, Tucker On Intel Control Of Congress

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript