Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2100 Scott Adams： Kamala The AI Czar, Trump Deposition, Tucker On Intel Control Of Congress

00:00:00.000 Da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-cha-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da

00:00:05.860 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of civilization.

00:00:11.620 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and you've never been happier.

00:00:15.840 Today will be maybe more amazing than usual because the news has served up funny stories,

00:00:22.660 which we like.

00:00:24.100 No, there will be no stories of giant phallus icebergs today,

00:00:28.240 but still, still we'll make something out of it.

00:00:31.060 It's amazing how we can do that.

00:00:33.080 All right, we're going to go private here on Locals.

00:00:36.040 And if you'd like to take your experience up a notch,

00:00:38.800 well, all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass,

00:00:41.480 a tanker, a chalice, a stein, a canteen, a jug, or a flask,

00:00:44.760 a vessel of any kind.

00:00:46.440 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.

00:00:49.480 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure,

00:00:52.700 the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:55.780 It's called the simultaneous sip.

00:00:58.900 It happens now. Go.

00:01:06.380 Yeah, that's how to start your morning, just like that.

00:01:09.900 You ready now? Now are you ready?

00:01:12.820 Well, you should be.

00:01:14.940 Well, yesterday in the news,

00:01:16.820 I'd like to summarize the headlines

00:01:20.060 from all of the major news entities that I checked today.

00:01:24.660 Summary.

00:01:26.180 Some British stuff happened yesterday.

00:01:29.700 Some British stuff.

00:01:31.800 I believe there were colorful outfits involved.

00:01:35.020 You know, my trouble with the monarchy

00:01:39.000 is not that it's not fun and interesting,

00:01:44.480 but that it feels more like somebody's hobby.

00:01:48.040 Doesn't it?

00:01:49.440 Like, it doesn't feel like a news event.

00:01:52.000 It feels like a hobby.

00:01:54.020 Oh, I really like talking about the royals.

00:01:59.220 Well, that's a hobby.

00:02:01.160 Or I really like seeing what outfits they wear

00:02:04.040 and the pageant and the ceremony.

00:02:06.580 It's like a dog show.

00:02:08.280 It's like any other hobby you like,

00:02:10.020 a sporting event.

00:02:11.360 I'm not entirely sure it deserves

00:02:13.500 all of our headlines in the United States.

00:02:16.780 And I'm in favor of the royal family.

00:02:19.400 No problem with it.

00:02:20.620 People like it.

00:02:22.200 If you like your king, keep your king.

00:02:25.320 But I don't know why that...

00:02:27.320 I don't know why it's news.

00:02:30.260 But there's a lot of it.

00:02:32.240 However, the news of coordinating a new king

00:02:35.760 in Great Britain pales in comparison

00:02:38.420 to the news that Kamala Harris

00:02:41.240 has been selected as the AI czar.

00:02:46.700 What?

00:02:47.220 Is the simulation messing with us?

00:02:53.680 Did the president of the United States

00:02:55.560 literally select

00:02:58.000 the least intelligent politician of all time

00:03:01.420 to be the czar of an advanced intelligence?

00:03:05.620 That didn't really happen, did it?

00:03:08.260 No.

00:03:09.500 Did that really, really happen?

00:03:12.060 Tell me that didn't happen.

00:03:13.340 That couldn't have possibly happened

00:03:16.540 in the real world.

00:03:19.720 It did?

00:03:22.780 What's going on?

00:03:24.700 I mean, come on.

00:03:26.600 Come on.

00:03:28.360 That's too far.

00:03:30.260 That's just too far.

00:03:32.700 All right.

00:03:33.800 Well, that happened.

00:03:36.580 Whereas Dana Perino said,

00:03:38.720 quote,

00:03:38.980 What made Biden think this was a good idea?

00:03:46.240 Dana Perino with her

00:03:47.720 understatement of the century.

00:03:51.440 Well, let's give somebody who's

00:03:53.600 famous for being a babbling idiot.

00:03:57.400 Who do we have?

00:03:58.280 Who do we have?

00:03:59.720 Well, there's this guy, Bob,

00:04:01.260 who's always, you know,

00:04:02.720 on the street saying nonsense.

00:04:04.400 No, Bob is not famous enough.

00:04:05.840 We need somebody who's famous

00:04:08.020 for being a babbling idiot.

00:04:11.340 Well, we got, I got an idea.

00:04:13.600 Got a vice president.

00:04:15.800 All right.

00:04:16.200 Well, I don't know how that conversation went down,

00:04:18.100 but it's funny either way.

00:04:20.760 We found out that TikTok had been

00:04:24.260 tracking your watching of gay content on TikTok.

00:04:28.960 So they had a list of people

00:04:30.380 who like to watch gay content on TikTok.

00:04:32.300 That's no problem, is it?

00:04:39.580 And some people said that

00:04:41.220 maybe for countries that were less open

00:04:44.140 than, let's say, the United States,

00:04:46.420 such information could be used for blackmail.

00:04:49.260 Well, I got news for you.

00:04:52.800 You could use that for blackmail

00:04:54.200 in the United States too.

00:04:55.480 Because there got to be people

00:05:00.840 who do not identify as LGBTQ

00:05:03.200 who, for whatever reason,

00:05:05.860 are looking at the content.

00:05:08.040 And, you know, as the article said,

00:05:09.660 it doesn't mean that they are members.

00:05:11.560 They might just be interested in the content

00:05:13.700 for whatever reason.

00:05:15.340 And I thought, well,

00:05:18.760 here's one more reason

00:05:19.960 to get rid of TikTok.

00:05:21.260 Now, TikTok says

00:05:23.240 they got rid of that feature,

00:05:25.400 that tracking feature

00:05:26.280 for the United States.

00:05:27.620 Because I guess the U.S. TikTok

00:05:29.080 is at least a little bit

00:05:30.600 walled off in some way.

00:05:32.440 But how do you like the fact

00:05:34.920 that they could do it?

00:05:37.160 Forget about the fact that they did it.

00:05:40.200 How about the fact that they can do it?

00:05:42.460 It's just one of those things they can do.

00:05:44.180 It actually would appear

00:05:45.160 right on the dashboard,

00:05:47.120 a list of people who looked

00:05:48.320 at all the gay stuff on TikTok.

00:05:52.240 What else do they have a list for?

00:05:54.900 We know they have a button for heat.

00:05:56.940 They can make any post go viral.

00:06:02.760 It's just mind-boggling

00:06:04.440 that it's still legal in the U.S.

00:06:08.080 Our government is just so corrupt

00:06:10.540 that the simplest thing,

00:06:12.480 the most obvious, simplest thing,

00:06:14.860 can't pull it off.

00:06:16.240 That's such an obvious tell for corruption.

00:06:18.220 Probably China interests, I guess.

00:06:22.160 Well, here's something

00:06:23.320 I never thought would happen.

00:06:25.820 The sport of bicycle racing

00:06:27.480 became interesting.

00:06:30.040 Did anybody see that coming?

00:06:31.520 You know, it wasn't until the,

00:06:36.660 was it Lance Armstrong,

00:06:38.100 who had one testicle

00:06:39.480 and performance-enhancing drugs,

00:06:42.660 and I said,

00:06:43.140 now, that guy's interesting.

00:06:44.980 The bicycle riding,

00:06:47.160 not so interesting.

00:06:48.760 At least the star is interesting.

00:06:50.580 You know, he's doing some stuff.

00:06:51.980 But now the tennis legend

00:06:56.520 Martina Novotrilova

00:06:58.320 is one of the people

00:07:00.400 complaining about a biological,

00:07:04.180 well, let's say a trans woman

00:07:05.920 winning some big bicycle race

00:07:09.640 in Mexico, New Mexico.

00:07:11.720 Austin Killips

00:07:12.760 winning the women's overall category.

00:07:15.600 Now,

00:07:17.880 do you think that it's like

00:07:20.640 extra vexing

00:07:21.660 because Austin didn't bother

00:07:23.120 to change Austin's name

00:07:25.380 from a male-sounding name

00:07:27.720 to a female-sounding name

00:07:28.940 when Austin transitioned?

00:07:32.880 Don't you feel that the women

00:07:34.740 in that race

00:07:35.560 were a little extra, extra mad

00:07:38.400 because Austin

00:07:41.560 is still called Austin

00:07:42.680 and won the race?

00:07:44.100 Now,

00:07:47.020 I don't think there's anything

00:07:48.780 less important

00:07:49.600 than bicycle racing.

00:07:51.220 Maybe in the whole world.

00:07:53.120 It's hard to think of anything

00:07:54.000 less important than that.

00:07:56.160 Who's the best at

00:07:57.340 pumping this bicycle

00:07:59.080 up a long mountain?

00:08:01.880 I don't care.

00:08:03.760 Does it matter

00:08:04.520 who's the best at that?

00:08:06.320 I don't know.

00:08:07.240 But they did find a way

00:08:08.400 to make it interesting

00:08:09.160 by having some controversy

00:08:10.720 injected into the sports.

00:08:12.400 So I'm going to say

00:08:13.560 that's a plus.

00:08:15.680 Not so good for the women

00:08:17.240 who wanted to be the winner.

00:08:19.740 But here's an interesting question,

00:08:24.780 in my opinion.

00:08:26.220 What is the point,

00:08:28.260 the purpose,

00:08:29.740 of bicycle racing?

00:08:32.080 What is his purpose?

00:08:34.080 I mean, besides making money,

00:08:35.840 of course.

00:08:36.500 But what's his purpose?

00:08:37.360 Is it for the benefit

00:08:39.820 of the athletes?

00:08:42.440 Or is it,

00:08:43.740 because it's a professional sport,

00:08:45.560 or is it for the benefit

00:08:47.000 of the observers?

00:08:49.820 If it's for the benefit

00:08:50.980 of the observers,

00:08:51.920 I think the situation's fine,

00:08:53.760 because it gave the observers

00:08:54.920 something to talk about.

00:08:56.800 Other than,

00:08:58.060 oh, that bicycle sure went fast.

00:09:00.440 Nothing else to talk about.

00:09:01.520 So if it's for the,

00:09:04.260 if bicycle racing

00:09:05.240 is for the benefit

00:09:06.040 of the athletes,

00:09:07.480 then some of them

00:09:08.420 probably have something

00:09:09.120 to complain about,

00:09:10.840 because the female athletes,

00:09:12.440 you know,

00:09:13.540 were disadvantaged,

00:09:15.820 as some would say.

00:09:17.720 But apparently,

00:09:18.700 this particular competitor

00:09:20.740 was under the limits

00:09:23.340 of testosterone.

00:09:24.080 So they do have some limits

00:09:26.320 on your testosterone level.

00:09:28.640 And this,

00:09:29.140 this athlete

00:09:30.780 passed that limit.

00:09:32.940 Still,

00:09:34.340 still,

00:09:35.200 it's an athlete

00:09:35.640 who is larger in size.

00:09:37.840 And some would say

00:09:38.840 that was unfair.

00:09:40.740 But anything to make

00:09:42.140 bicycle racing

00:09:42.920 more interesting,

00:09:43.680 I'm in favor of it.

00:09:45.400 Well,

00:09:45.760 Tucker has

00:09:46.400 sort of emerged.

00:09:49.840 He did a

00:09:50.400 interview I saw

00:09:51.920 with Tulsi Gabbard.

00:09:54.720 And he continues

00:09:56.020 to make news.

00:09:58.780 And he said,

00:09:59.800 he told a fascinating story

00:10:01.580 about how

00:10:02.220 he got interested

00:10:04.320 in Trump

00:10:04.960 from not being interested

00:10:06.460 at all in the beginning.

00:10:08.100 And he said

00:10:09.460 it was because

00:10:10.080 Trump kept asking questions

00:10:11.780 that

00:10:13.140 were only obvious questions

00:10:15.660 after you heard them.

00:10:16.960 Such as,

00:10:17.940 why are we funding NATO?

00:10:20.220 That would be one example

00:10:21.620 that Tucker gave.

00:10:23.540 And Tucker said,

00:10:24.660 quite reasonably,

00:10:25.740 I never even thought

00:10:26.580 about it.

00:10:27.720 Like,

00:10:27.940 it was never even

00:10:28.520 a question.

00:10:29.320 But as soon as

00:10:30.080 he asked the question,

00:10:30.900 everybody got mad.

00:10:32.580 And when everybody

00:10:33.160 got mad

00:10:33.900 and would be too angry

00:10:35.340 to answer the question,

00:10:37.160 Tucker realized

00:10:37.820 there was something there.

00:10:39.360 You know,

00:10:39.880 and also about

00:10:40.460 immigration

00:10:41.000 and other questions.

00:10:41.920 So it wasn't so much

00:10:43.540 what Trump was asking,

00:10:45.540 according to Tucker,

00:10:46.660 it was the fact

00:10:47.460 that nobody

00:10:47.860 would answer him.

00:10:49.700 And that told him

00:10:50.380 everything.

00:10:50.900 That was a tell,

00:10:52.020 he said,

00:10:52.480 that the government

00:10:53.140 was worse off

00:10:55.680 than maybe he thought.

00:10:59.100 All right,

00:10:59.560 so,

00:10:59.980 Tucker also continues

00:11:02.080 to say that

00:11:02.760 members of Congress

00:11:03.680 are controlled

00:11:04.320 by the intelligence community,

00:11:05.860 just as a fact.

00:11:08.720 Because he knows people

00:11:10.120 personally,

00:11:11.640 and he can tell you

00:11:13.060 with complete confidence

00:11:14.580 that the intel agencies

00:11:16.340 own members of Congress.

00:11:18.380 Important ones.

00:11:20.720 Now,

00:11:21.720 that's all you need

00:11:23.040 to know,

00:11:23.440 isn't it?

00:11:24.160 That explains

00:11:25.080 everything we've seen.

00:11:27.420 100% of everything

00:11:28.820 in the news,

00:11:30.100 politically,

00:11:30.840 is explained

00:11:31.900 by that one thing.

00:11:32.820 You can explain

00:11:34.140 your January 6th.

00:11:36.340 You can explain

00:11:37.840 any irregularities

00:11:39.820 in voting.

00:11:41.160 It's like,

00:11:41.620 it fits every narrative.

00:11:44.700 It doesn't mean

00:11:45.700 that it fits them correctly.

00:11:47.540 I mean,

00:11:47.800 I might be force-fitting

00:11:48.840 them in there.

00:11:49.680 But everything

00:11:50.460 that you suspected

00:11:51.400 might be a little sketchy

00:11:52.740 would be completely

00:11:54.780 explained

00:11:55.440 by the intelligence

00:11:57.120 community

00:11:57.860 running the country.

00:12:00.460 I'm not saying

00:12:01.380 it is.

00:12:01.860 but it would

00:12:03.560 explain everything.

00:12:05.840 All right.

00:12:08.700 Biden was

00:12:09.900 complaining

00:12:11.980 in an interview

00:12:12.640 about his low

00:12:13.800 approval ratings,

00:12:15.100 relatively low

00:12:15.860 approval ratings,

00:12:16.940 and Biden said

00:12:18.140 that the problem

00:12:19.520 was negative

00:12:20.680 press.

00:12:22.480 Negative press

00:12:23.680 for Biden.

00:12:26.640 He actually

00:12:27.600 said that

00:12:28.060 with a straight face

00:12:29.020 to MSNBC.

00:12:31.860 He thought MSNBC

00:12:33.200 was giving him

00:12:33.880 negative press.

00:12:36.240 Compared to,

00:12:37.740 compared to

00:12:40.200 what?

00:12:42.480 Compared to

00:12:43.680 Trump?

00:12:47.440 Come on.

00:12:48.980 Or as Joe would say,

00:12:50.200 come on.

00:12:51.840 I'm not joking.

00:12:53.520 Yeah,

00:12:53.920 that's his problem.

00:12:54.640 All that negative press

00:12:56.100 from the left.

00:13:01.120 Here's something

00:13:01.940 that I saw today

00:13:02.980 that I did not know.

00:13:04.820 Remember I predicted

00:13:06.200 that AI would become

00:13:07.980 illegal?

00:13:10.560 Anywhere that AI

00:13:11.700 could really make

00:13:12.600 a difference,

00:13:13.200 it's going to become

00:13:13.880 illegal.

00:13:15.460 It'll become illegal

00:13:16.660 partly because people

00:13:18.280 don't want to lose jobs.

00:13:20.060 There'll be security

00:13:20.980 interests.

00:13:21.560 We'll find a million

00:13:23.500 different reasons

00:13:24.260 to make something

00:13:25.120 illegal.

00:13:26.140 Oh, it's a privacy

00:13:27.140 problem.

00:13:27.760 We've got to make

00:13:28.380 it illegal.

00:13:29.480 Well, today I found

00:13:30.380 out that if I were

00:13:32.280 to pursue my plan

00:13:33.640 of using AI

00:13:35.740 to create an

00:13:36.740 audio book

00:13:37.480 of some of my books

00:13:38.980 that don't have

00:13:39.840 an audio available,

00:13:42.140 that Amazon

00:13:42.900 will not accept

00:13:43.920 it on their website.

00:13:46.620 And Audible

00:13:47.500 will not accept it.

00:13:48.560 Just think about that.

00:13:52.480 AI is the obvious

00:13:53.940 way to make

00:13:54.500 an audio book.

00:13:55.260 It's the obvious way.

00:13:56.500 But Amazon has

00:13:57.440 deals with Audible.

00:13:59.660 Audible's business

00:14:00.480 model would basically

00:14:01.420 just disappear

00:14:02.260 because it's humans

00:14:03.500 reading books.

00:14:05.940 So probably Amazon

00:14:07.480 talks to Audible

00:14:08.320 and says,

00:14:09.060 uh-oh,

00:14:09.680 we don't want our

00:14:10.700 whole audio book

00:14:11.540 thing to disappear,

00:14:12.940 so what do you

00:14:14.340 Audible guys need?

00:14:15.700 And the Audible

00:14:16.240 guys say,

00:14:17.280 or Audible

00:14:18.360 women say,

00:14:19.860 well,

00:14:20.780 don't let that

00:14:21.520 AI voice generated

00:14:22.740 stuff on your

00:14:23.340 platform.

00:14:25.900 And then Amazon

00:14:27.020 says,

00:14:27.580 okay.

00:14:28.340 Now you can still

00:14:29.180 put that content

00:14:30.080 on,

00:14:31.180 at least last I knew,

00:14:33.540 Google Play

00:14:34.220 and Barnes & Noble

00:14:35.060 and Spotify,

00:14:36.440 so it's not

00:14:37.580 illegal everywhere,

00:14:38.900 but if your

00:14:39.440 audio book is

00:14:40.180 illegal on Amazon,

00:14:42.180 it's as good

00:14:43.440 as impossible.

00:14:44.620 I mean,

00:14:44.880 because economically

00:14:45.280 people wouldn't

00:14:46.820 probably wouldn't

00:14:47.580 bother.

00:14:49.080 So,

00:14:49.720 I was looking up,

00:14:51.800 I saw this on

00:14:52.360 the website for

00:14:53.180 a company that

00:14:54.100 offers a service

00:14:55.640 to have a variety

00:14:57.460 of voices read

00:14:59.260 your book for you

00:14:59.900 to make an

00:15:00.560 audio book,

00:15:01.580 and it warned

00:15:02.700 that you couldn't

00:15:03.320 sell the audio

00:15:03.920 book on Amazon.

00:15:07.020 So,

00:15:07.940 anyway,

00:15:08.420 more to my,

00:15:09.380 that has more

00:15:10.020 to do with my

00:15:10.540 prediction that

00:15:11.340 we will cripple

00:15:13.500 AI by making it

00:15:14.560 illegal everywhere

00:15:16.020 where we can

00:15:16.680 for financial

00:15:18.320 interests.

00:15:20.060 Well,

00:15:20.260 California's

00:15:20.920 Reparation Task

00:15:22.020 Force,

00:15:22.500 the one that

00:15:22.840 recommended a

00:15:24.200 gazillion dollars

00:15:24.960 of reparations,

00:15:26.200 is also voting

00:15:27.040 on whether

00:15:27.500 California should

00:15:28.420 apologize,

00:15:29.520 formally apologize,

00:15:30.340 for the state's

00:15:33.080 legacy of slavery

00:15:34.100 and discrimination

00:15:34.780 against black

00:15:35.580 people.

00:15:36.400 Now,

00:15:36.680 the first thing

00:15:37.160 you're going to

00:15:37.480 say is,

00:15:38.100 Scott,

00:15:39.400 California didn't

00:15:40.320 have a legacy

00:15:40.920 of slavery.

00:15:42.460 Well,

00:15:42.920 not exactly.

00:15:44.600 Although there

00:15:45.120 was not slavery

00:15:46.120 per se,

00:15:47.820 the reporting

00:15:48.900 says that

00:15:49.500 California would,

00:15:50.580 for example,

00:15:51.820 return escaped

00:15:52.740 slaves to

00:15:54.020 slave states.

00:15:55.820 So,

00:15:56.680 that was

00:15:57.360 participating in

00:15:58.240 slavery.

00:15:58.800 There's no way

00:15:59.280 around that.

00:16:00.640 If California

00:16:02.040 returned slaves

00:16:04.000 to slave states,

00:16:05.880 they were

00:16:06.240 absolutely part

00:16:07.020 of slavery.

00:16:08.520 Would you

00:16:08.840 agree?

00:16:09.060 That was

00:16:10.880 something I

00:16:11.960 hadn't heard

00:16:12.340 before.

00:16:14.400 Not participating

00:16:15.800 in exactly the

00:16:16.800 same way,

00:16:17.740 but that's

00:16:18.380 certainly part

00:16:18.900 of the process.

00:16:19.920 Because if

00:16:20.460 slaves could

00:16:21.020 just run

00:16:21.460 away and

00:16:21.860 go to a

00:16:22.280 state where

00:16:22.660 there's no

00:16:23.080 slavery,

00:16:24.640 probably it

00:16:25.440 would have

00:16:25.600 been hard

00:16:25.960 to maintain

00:16:26.480 slavery,

00:16:27.560 because all

00:16:27.940 they need

00:16:28.320 to do is

00:16:29.120 run away.

00:16:30.460 So,

00:16:31.660 having states

00:16:32.680 be willing

00:16:33.140 to return

00:16:33.740 the slaves

00:16:34.240 seems to

00:16:35.000 me a

00:16:36.180 pretty important

00:16:36.820 part of

00:16:37.280 keeping

00:16:37.560 slavery

00:16:38.120 an active

00:16:39.460 thing.

00:16:40.700 So,

00:16:40.980 I would

00:16:41.160 agree that

00:16:41.680 there's

00:16:41.940 something to

00:16:42.420 let's say

00:16:44.600 account for.

00:16:46.180 But,

00:16:46.860 what do you

00:16:47.240 think of

00:16:47.460 this idea

00:16:48.000 of an

00:16:48.740 apology?

00:16:51.320 Well,

00:16:52.300 the question

00:16:52.860 I asked is

00:16:53.580 who would

00:16:53.860 give this

00:16:54.220 apology?

00:16:55.920 Because there

00:16:56.600 are no

00:16:56.840 living people

00:16:57.600 who need

00:16:58.540 to apologize.

00:17:00.320 But,

00:17:01.000 let's say

00:17:02.020 it's the

00:17:02.440 governor.

00:17:04.160 Do you

00:17:04.520 think that

00:17:05.360 the real

00:17:06.520 motive here

00:17:08.100 is to

00:17:10.380 just

00:17:10.680 humiliate

00:17:11.500 a white

00:17:11.900 person in

00:17:12.440 public?

00:17:13.940 Because that's

00:17:14.700 what it

00:17:14.920 looks like,

00:17:15.320 right?

00:17:15.900 This is all

00:17:16.660 about just

00:17:17.120 humiliating

00:17:17.660 white people,

00:17:18.260 isn't it?

00:17:19.860 Because I

00:17:20.440 don't see that

00:17:21.000 an apology

00:17:21.660 would help

00:17:22.080 anybody when

00:17:23.400 it's coming

00:17:23.860 from someone

00:17:24.360 who had

00:17:24.640 nothing to

00:17:25.080 do with

00:17:25.320 anything.

00:17:26.740 So,

00:17:27.060 to me,

00:17:27.300 it looks

00:17:27.520 like just

00:17:28.020 another

00:17:28.580 public show

00:17:29.460 trial of

00:17:30.160 how to

00:17:30.620 humiliate

00:17:31.380 white people

00:17:31.900 as part of

00:17:32.980 the continuous

00:17:34.100 process of

00:17:35.760 doing that.

00:17:36.160 so I

00:17:37.460 would like

00:17:37.780 to volunteer

00:17:38.540 to be

00:17:39.120 the one

00:17:39.480 to give

00:17:39.780 the apology

00:17:40.300 if I

00:17:41.680 could.

00:17:42.960 I'd like

00:17:43.560 California

00:17:44.060 to nominate

00:17:44.720 me if

00:17:45.480 they vote

00:17:45.800 for this.

00:17:46.780 I would

00:17:47.220 like to be

00:17:47.560 the one

00:17:47.800 to give

00:17:48.020 the apology

00:17:48.500 because this

00:17:50.400 calls for a

00:17:51.280 special kind

00:17:51.880 of apology,

00:17:52.520 doesn't it?

00:17:53.940 There's a

00:17:54.540 special kind.

00:17:55.840 I have a

00:17:56.540 name for

00:17:56.900 this kind

00:17:57.260 of apology.

00:17:58.320 Do you

00:17:58.580 know what

00:17:58.780 it's called?

00:18:00.400 What's the

00:18:01.020 name for

00:18:01.440 this kind

00:18:01.860 of apology?

00:18:04.000 A husband

00:18:04.720 apology.

00:18:05.160 It's called

00:18:05.900 a husband

00:18:06.280 apology.

00:18:07.860 A husband

00:18:08.540 apology works

00:18:09.360 like this.

00:18:10.680 You know

00:18:11.180 you don't

00:18:11.720 owe an

00:18:12.040 apology,

00:18:13.720 but because

00:18:14.760 you have

00:18:15.180 low regard

00:18:15.880 for the

00:18:16.240 person who

00:18:17.000 is demanding

00:18:17.560 it,

00:18:18.280 you give

00:18:18.920 them one

00:18:19.420 because you

00:18:20.360 have a

00:18:20.620 very low

00:18:21.060 opinion of

00:18:21.600 them.

00:18:23.400 So I

00:18:23.960 have a

00:18:24.260 very low

00:18:24.760 opinion of

00:18:25.260 the people

00:18:25.580 demanding

00:18:26.080 the apology

00:18:26.680 because it

00:18:27.200 looks like

00:18:27.520 just a way

00:18:28.180 to humiliate

00:18:28.780 white people.

00:18:29.640 So I

00:18:29.960 would love

00:18:30.300 to be the

00:18:30.660 one to give

00:18:31.020 the apology.

00:18:32.080 I will

00:18:32.420 give you

00:18:32.760 the husband

00:18:33.300 apology,

00:18:33.840 that

00:18:34.640 absolutely

00:18:35.600 disrespects

00:18:36.960 the people

00:18:37.320 getting it

00:18:37.820 more than

00:18:38.200 anything you've

00:18:38.840 ever heard

00:18:39.160 in your

00:18:39.360 life.

00:18:40.100 I will

00:18:40.600 show so

00:18:41.100 little respect

00:18:41.980 for the

00:18:42.900 people receiving

00:18:43.580 the apology

00:18:44.120 that you'll

00:18:44.580 wish you'd

00:18:44.880 never asked

00:18:45.300 for it.

00:18:46.360 And that's

00:18:46.720 what I

00:18:46.960 call a

00:18:47.600 husband

00:18:47.840 apology.

00:18:48.860 Because by

00:18:49.380 the way,

00:18:49.920 fuck you,

00:18:50.440 everybody asking

00:18:51.060 for it.

00:18:51.880 Because really

00:18:52.360 it's just a

00:18:52.860 way to shame

00:18:53.400 and humiliate

00:18:54.120 white people.

00:18:54.760 Let's be

00:18:55.020 honest,

00:18:55.880 that's all

00:18:56.280 it is.

00:18:57.420 And if

00:18:57.700 you want to

00:18:58.580 do that,

00:18:59.240 please have

00:18:59.760 me deliver

00:19:01.140 the apology.

00:19:01.720 I'll be

00:19:02.620 happy to

00:19:03.020 give you

00:19:03.320 a fake

00:19:03.760 fucking

00:19:04.140 apology

00:19:04.580 to

00:19:06.120 satisfy

00:19:06.640 your

00:19:07.140 well,

00:19:11.180 whatever it

00:19:11.920 is that

00:19:12.200 you need.

00:19:13.100 Whatever it

00:19:13.800 is you

00:19:14.060 need,

00:19:14.380 if you need

00:19:15.020 to be

00:19:15.340 infantilized,

00:19:16.400 I will

00:19:16.920 do that

00:19:17.280 for you.

00:19:18.440 So anybody

00:19:19.020 who would

00:19:19.320 like to be

00:19:19.740 infantilized

00:19:20.760 by a fake

00:19:22.280 apology,

00:19:23.520 I offer

00:19:24.380 it with

00:19:25.060 all insincerity.

00:19:26.160 How many

00:19:29.580 of you

00:19:29.820 saw the

00:19:30.400 video of

00:19:31.140 Trump

00:19:31.480 deposition,

00:19:32.520 I guess

00:19:32.820 it happened

00:19:33.120 months ago,

00:19:34.520 on E.G.

00:19:35.680 and Carroll?

00:19:36.940 Did any

00:19:37.560 of you

00:19:37.760 see that?

00:19:42.780 I rated

00:19:43.700 it the

00:19:44.160 best answer

00:19:44.920 to any

00:19:46.720 questions,

00:19:47.740 not just

00:19:48.500 in depositions,

00:19:50.140 not just

00:19:50.700 by Trump,

00:19:52.340 but the

00:19:52.800 best answer

00:19:53.440 to a

00:19:53.820 question

00:19:54.220 of any

00:19:55.240 question

00:19:55.600 that's

00:19:55.840 ever been

00:19:56.220 asked

00:19:56.600 in the

00:19:57.380 history

00:19:57.660 of

00:19:57.840 questions?

00:19:59.820 That's

00:20:00.340 my rating

00:20:00.860 of Trump

00:20:01.900 on there.

00:20:03.200 Now,

00:20:03.660 here's the

00:20:04.120 thing that

00:20:04.580 I don't

00:20:05.080 know and

00:20:06.120 can't

00:20:06.580 know.

00:20:07.180 I don't

00:20:07.780 know what's

00:20:08.200 true,

00:20:09.440 right?

00:20:09.800 So I

00:20:10.080 don't know

00:20:10.620 if Trump

00:20:12.220 ever met

00:20:12.760 E.G.

00:20:13.200 and Carroll.

00:20:15.120 I have

00:20:15.620 no idea.

00:20:16.920 So I

00:20:17.420 can't know

00:20:17.800 what's

00:20:18.020 true.

00:20:18.420 I can

00:20:18.760 only tell

00:20:19.140 you his

00:20:19.560 performance.

00:20:21.480 And I

00:20:22.800 know,

00:20:23.120 I know,

00:20:23.500 you're

00:20:23.800 going to

00:20:23.900 say that

00:20:24.320 Trump is

00:20:24.780 a skilled

00:20:25.460 professional

00:20:26.260 liar.

00:20:27.340 I know.

00:20:28.420 But with

00:20:30.380 that context,

00:20:31.580 how did

00:20:32.500 he do

00:20:32.900 when he

00:20:33.320 denied the

00:20:34.120 allegations on

00:20:35.040 video?

00:20:37.080 Really,

00:20:37.800 really well.

00:20:39.680 That was

00:20:40.380 the best

00:20:40.840 denial.

00:20:41.980 I've never

00:20:42.540 seen a

00:20:42.920 better denial

00:20:43.560 of a crime.

00:20:45.540 Or,

00:20:46.220 I don't know,

00:20:46.780 I'm not sure

00:20:47.140 they're calling

00:20:47.540 it a crime

00:20:48.080 because it's

00:20:48.500 a civil

00:20:49.460 trial,

00:20:49.840 but let's

00:20:50.100 say,

00:20:50.580 denial of

00:20:51.280 an event.

00:20:51.800 I've

00:20:52.680 never

00:20:52.920 seen a

00:20:53.340 better

00:20:53.500 one.

00:20:54.880 His

00:20:55.440 direct

00:20:57.040 denial

00:20:58.500 is as

00:20:59.640 clean

00:21:00.260 and

00:21:00.640 unambiguous

00:21:01.360 and he

00:21:02.440 delivers it

00:21:03.140 with complete

00:21:04.060 conviction

00:21:04.740 like he

00:21:06.200 believes it.

00:21:08.600 I'm not

00:21:09.240 saying it's

00:21:09.640 true,

00:21:10.380 right?

00:21:11.200 I'm not,

00:21:12.400 I wasn't born

00:21:12.960 yesterday.

00:21:14.140 So people

00:21:14.720 in that

00:21:15.020 situation,

00:21:15.680 of course,

00:21:16.020 have an

00:21:16.300 incentive to

00:21:16.880 lie if

00:21:17.400 there's

00:21:17.580 something to

00:21:17.980 lie about.

00:21:18.460 And we

00:21:19.580 would agree

00:21:20.060 that maybe

00:21:20.600 Trump's been

00:21:21.760 in public

00:21:22.300 life long

00:21:22.880 enough that

00:21:23.280 he can

00:21:23.560 deliver a

00:21:24.120 lie.

00:21:25.380 But,

00:21:26.140 oh my

00:21:26.500 God,

00:21:26.800 did it

00:21:27.040 look real.

00:21:29.000 If I

00:21:29.620 were in

00:21:29.880 the jury,

00:21:30.440 I would

00:21:30.700 have

00:21:30.820 absolutely

00:21:31.260 been

00:21:31.780 influenced

00:21:33.200 by just

00:21:34.760 the straight

00:21:36.240 directness

00:21:37.780 of the

00:21:38.120 denial.

00:21:39.400 Now,

00:21:39.820 you have

00:21:40.080 to watch

00:21:40.420 it to

00:21:40.740 actually see

00:21:41.340 what I'm

00:21:41.560 talking about,

00:21:42.140 but he

00:21:42.380 does it

00:21:42.820 well.

00:21:43.340 But the

00:21:43.580 other thing

00:21:43.920 he does

00:21:44.340 is,

00:21:46.560 and only

00:21:47.960 Trump would

00:21:48.440 do this.

00:21:49.640 He said

00:21:50.060 that part

00:21:51.360 of his

00:21:51.620 defense is

00:21:52.240 that E.

00:21:53.620 Jean Carroll

00:21:54.080 was,

00:21:54.660 quote,

00:21:54.740 not his

00:21:55.160 type.

00:21:57.900 And he

00:21:58.460 was asked

00:21:58.960 to defend

00:22:00.040 that statement

00:22:00.740 that basically

00:22:02.800 he was saying

00:22:03.380 that she

00:22:03.740 was unattractive.

00:22:05.780 But he

00:22:06.400 meant that

00:22:06.880 when asked,

00:22:07.700 he meant

00:22:08.000 that in a

00:22:08.500 comprehensive

00:22:09.020 way she

00:22:09.500 was unattractive.

00:22:10.600 Not just

00:22:11.140 her looks,

00:22:12.040 but she

00:22:12.360 was unattractive

00:22:13.100 in every

00:22:13.440 way.

00:22:16.080 And then

00:22:16.660 he says

00:22:17.020 they asked

00:22:18.160 him to

00:22:18.640 confirm

00:22:19.760 if he

00:22:20.180 really

00:22:20.420 believed

00:22:20.840 that

00:22:21.240 statement.

00:22:22.340 And it's

00:22:22.640 like,

00:22:23.160 oh yeah.

00:22:24.960 He totally

00:22:25.820 confirms

00:22:26.460 his belief

00:22:27.540 that he

00:22:28.260 would never

00:22:28.740 get involved

00:22:29.440 with somebody

00:22:30.120 that unattractive.

00:22:32.560 Now,

00:22:32.860 he didn't

00:22:33.040 use the word

00:22:33.420 unattractive,

00:22:34.120 but he

00:22:34.720 was saying

00:22:35.420 it quite

00:22:35.800 directly.

00:22:37.800 Now,

00:22:38.600 who in

00:22:39.080 the world

00:22:39.420 would do

00:22:39.820 that?

00:22:40.980 Can you

00:22:41.260 think of

00:22:41.600 anybody

00:22:42.100 else who

00:22:42.580 would try

00:22:42.900 that approach,

00:22:44.200 that she's

00:22:44.660 too unattractive?

00:22:45.480 now here's

00:22:47.960 what it

00:22:48.240 did.

00:22:48.940 It was

00:22:49.760 sort of

00:22:50.080 a Rosie

00:22:50.560 O'Donnell

00:22:51.140 play.

00:22:53.040 You know,

00:22:53.220 you all

00:22:53.460 know how

00:22:54.300 he made

00:22:54.820 fun of

00:22:55.200 Rosie

00:22:55.600 O'Donnell,

00:22:56.220 which

00:22:56.720 completely

00:22:57.160 moved the

00:22:57.660 energy away

00:22:58.460 from the

00:22:58.820 accusations,

00:23:00.300 which were

00:23:00.720 damning,

00:23:01.800 to Rosie

00:23:03.100 O'Donnell

00:23:03.560 in something

00:23:04.020 that's just

00:23:04.480 funny.

00:23:05.560 Well,

00:23:05.860 he's doing

00:23:06.300 it again,

00:23:07.380 or he did

00:23:07.780 it again

00:23:08.160 with this

00:23:08.580 deposition.

00:23:09.540 By moving

00:23:10.320 it to the

00:23:10.880 question of

00:23:11.420 whether he

00:23:12.380 would consider

00:23:12.980 having sex

00:23:14.540 with somebody

00:23:15.100 like her,

00:23:16.800 I can't

00:23:17.360 help but

00:23:17.700 laugh.

00:23:19.380 I just

00:23:20.040 laugh at

00:23:20.580 the audacity

00:23:21.400 of that.

00:23:22.760 And also

00:23:23.240 the fact

00:23:23.720 that I

00:23:24.120 think he's

00:23:26.080 being honest.

00:23:27.980 Or it

00:23:28.540 comes across

00:23:29.140 that way.

00:23:29.900 In other

00:23:30.160 words,

00:23:30.420 it's the

00:23:30.700 sort of

00:23:30.940 thing you

00:23:31.240 wouldn't

00:23:31.600 say unless

00:23:32.200 you sort

00:23:32.600 of thought

00:23:32.920 it.

00:23:34.100 Now,

00:23:34.700 he might.

00:23:35.820 Anything's

00:23:36.300 possible.

00:23:37.080 But it

00:23:37.320 has the

00:23:37.660 feel of

00:23:38.200 something you

00:23:39.220 would never

00:23:39.760 say out

00:23:40.300 loud unless

00:23:41.760 you meant

00:23:42.180 it.

00:23:42.360 the one

00:23:43.900 situation

00:23:44.380 where you'd

00:23:44.800 say that

00:23:45.140 out loud

00:23:45.540 is,

00:23:45.860 yeah,

00:23:46.020 he actually

00:23:46.340 meant it.

00:23:47.360 And it

00:23:47.660 actually does

00:23:49.920 go to the

00:23:50.560 question of

00:23:51.020 whether it

00:23:51.360 happened.

00:23:52.200 It's entirely

00:23:52.900 appropriate.

00:23:54.260 Like,

00:23:54.580 it fits

00:23:55.240 the thing.

00:23:56.880 And to

00:23:57.120 see Trump

00:23:57.600 say,

00:23:58.260 oh,

00:23:58.400 I know I'm

00:23:58.680 not supposed

00:23:59.080 to say

00:23:59.400 this,

00:23:59.720 it's

00:23:59.840 politically

00:24:00.300 incorrect,

00:24:01.180 but I

00:24:01.480 totally,

00:24:02.040 totally

00:24:02.840 back it.

00:24:05.540 Anyway,

00:24:06.700 yeah,

00:24:08.080 I've never

00:24:10.100 seen anybody

00:24:10.720 defend themselves

00:24:11.700 better,

00:24:12.820 but again,

00:24:13.940 the quality

00:24:14.540 of his

00:24:14.940 defense has

00:24:15.680 nothing to

00:24:16.120 do with

00:24:16.480 whether

00:24:16.720 anything

00:24:17.160 really

00:24:17.540 happened.

00:24:18.060 I don't

00:24:18.280 know.

00:24:18.960 I have

00:24:19.180 no way

00:24:19.440 to know.

00:24:20.960 But that

00:24:21.640 was great.

00:24:22.480 Oh,

00:24:22.560 and he was

00:24:22.800 also asked

00:24:23.380 about the

00:24:24.100 grab him

00:24:24.680 by the

00:24:25.320 burp,

00:24:26.180 burp,

00:24:26.700 you know,

00:24:27.160 that word.

00:24:28.300 And instead

00:24:29.160 of backing

00:24:29.640 away from

00:24:30.180 it,

00:24:31.300 holy Trump,

00:24:35.240 he said,

00:24:35.820 yeah,

00:24:35.980 it's been

00:24:36.240 true for a

00:24:36.780 million years

00:24:37.440 that stars

00:24:40.820 or what

00:24:42.320 would pass

00:24:43.340 as a star

00:24:43.880 a million

00:24:44.260 years ago,

00:24:45.260 that women

00:24:46.700 allow them

00:24:47.480 to take

00:24:48.920 extra

00:24:49.560 measures

00:24:51.160 that would

00:24:52.480 not be

00:24:52.900 appropriate

00:24:53.280 for anybody

00:24:54.140 else.

00:24:55.960 And he

00:24:56.180 said,

00:24:56.440 yeah,

00:24:56.620 that's been

00:24:56.940 true for a

00:24:57.380 million years.

00:24:58.280 And I'm

00:24:58.600 like,

00:24:59.260 okay,

00:24:59.540 you're not

00:24:59.920 supposed to

00:25:00.480 say that.

00:25:01.760 You're not

00:25:02.320 supposed to

00:25:02.780 say it's

00:25:03.140 true.

00:25:03.460 And then

00:25:05.080 they say,

00:25:05.760 well,

00:25:05.960 was that

00:25:06.240 locker room

00:25:06.800 talk?

00:25:07.600 He goes,

00:25:07.920 yeah,

00:25:08.120 it's

00:25:08.240 locker room

00:25:08.600 talk.

00:25:09.180 They say,

00:25:09.680 was it

00:25:10.060 true?

00:25:10.640 He goes,

00:25:12.180 it's just

00:25:12.540 how people

00:25:12.960 talk.

00:25:13.940 It's just

00:25:14.300 locker room

00:25:14.760 talk,

00:25:15.260 which is

00:25:16.000 exactly the

00:25:16.720 right answer

00:25:17.220 because it's

00:25:18.660 always been

00:25:19.060 true.

00:25:20.660 It's not

00:25:21.300 true of

00:25:21.640 every person,

00:25:23.240 obviously.

00:25:24.800 He might

00:25:25.440 have said

00:25:25.720 that,

00:25:26.060 but I can't

00:25:26.560 remember.

00:25:27.100 Nothing's

00:25:27.540 true of

00:25:27.900 every person

00:25:28.560 if it's a

00:25:29.420 generalization,

00:25:30.720 but as a

00:25:31.480 generalization,

00:25:32.460 yes,

00:25:32.720 it's true.

00:25:33.720 It's

00:25:34.120 absolutely

00:25:34.500 true,

00:25:35.340 as a

00:25:36.120 generalization.

00:25:37.320 And so

00:25:37.540 he just,

00:25:38.240 instead of

00:25:38.720 denying it

00:25:39.360 or weaseling

00:25:39.920 out of it,

00:25:40.360 he just

00:25:40.660 went at

00:25:41.040 it.

00:25:41.540 He goes,

00:25:41.760 yeah,

00:25:41.940 it's just

00:25:42.220 always been

00:25:42.620 true.

00:25:44.820 I can't

00:25:45.480 think of a

00:25:45.880 better answer

00:25:46.340 to that

00:25:46.660 question,

00:25:47.120 can you?

00:25:49.880 There's

00:25:50.280 literally no

00:25:50.920 way to

00:25:51.200 answer that

00:25:51.620 question better

00:25:52.240 than it's

00:25:52.860 just true.

00:25:59.240 All right.

00:26:01.040 Now,

00:26:01.480 of course,

00:26:01.820 he was

00:26:02.080 using a

00:26:02.480 little bit

00:26:02.740 hyperbole

00:26:03.620 when he

00:26:04.060 said,

00:26:04.400 grab them

00:26:04.820 by the

00:26:05.200 moon.

00:26:05.680 I didn't

00:26:06.080 take that

00:26:06.500 as being

00:26:06.900 literal.

00:26:07.700 Did anybody

00:26:08.100 take that

00:26:08.540 as being

00:26:08.820 literal?

00:26:11.160 I mean,

00:26:11.940 it might

00:26:12.280 be literal

00:26:12.700 in some

00:26:13.100 special cases,

00:26:14.180 but I'm

00:26:14.800 sure he

00:26:15.080 doesn't

00:26:15.480 mean it

00:26:15.900 like all

00:26:16.860 women

00:26:17.220 literally.

00:26:18.880 And have

00:26:19.880 you noticed

00:26:20.320 that a lot

00:26:22.960 of what

00:26:23.240 passes as

00:26:24.060 outrage is

00:26:25.580 somebody

00:26:26.040 pretending

00:26:26.620 that

00:26:27.560 somebody

00:26:27.940 else

00:26:28.260 meant

00:26:28.520 everybody.

00:26:29.980 Because

00:26:30.440 that's

00:26:30.640 how I

00:26:30.920 got

00:26:31.080 canceled.

00:26:32.500 So the

00:26:33.400 most common

00:26:33.980 way that

00:26:34.460 the

00:26:34.700 cancelers

00:26:35.320 get you

00:26:35.740 is to

00:26:36.660 pretend

00:26:37.000 they can't

00:26:37.640 tell that

00:26:39.040 you didn't

00:26:39.440 mean

00:26:39.640 everybody.

00:26:41.280 Who in

00:26:41.960 the world

00:26:42.440 thought that

00:26:43.240 Trump meant

00:26:43.720 everybody?

00:26:44.880 That he

00:26:45.180 could walk

00:26:45.600 up to

00:26:46.040 Margaret Thatcher

00:26:47.180 and grab

00:26:47.680 her by the

00:26:48.080 pussy?

00:26:49.220 She's dead,

00:26:49.940 but you know

00:26:50.540 what I mean.

00:26:51.460 Nobody thought

00:26:52.020 that.

00:26:52.960 Nobody thought

00:26:53.640 that.

00:26:55.120 Nobody thought

00:26:56.040 that.

00:26:56.840 And yet

00:26:57.200 that was

00:26:57.660 the claim.

00:26:58.700 The claim

00:26:59.100 was that he

00:26:59.520 meant everybody.

00:27:01.800 So how many

00:27:03.480 times do you

00:27:03.980 see people

00:27:04.380 get in

00:27:04.700 trouble for

00:27:05.840 the, oh

00:27:06.740 you meant

00:27:07.280 everybody,

00:27:08.020 when nobody

00:27:08.760 means everybody.

00:27:10.080 Nobody ever

00:27:11.080 means anybody.

00:27:13.520 And even

00:27:14.000 that was an

00:27:14.700 exaggeration.

00:27:16.900 All right.

00:27:21.380 I saw a

00:27:22.380 study using

00:27:23.500 satellites to

00:27:24.460 measure the

00:27:26.040 industrial

00:27:26.920 pollution of

00:27:27.820 Russia to

00:27:29.160 find out if

00:27:29.720 their economy

00:27:30.280 is thriving

00:27:31.320 or dying.

00:27:33.300 And according

00:27:33.880 to this one

00:27:34.860 study of

00:27:35.740 satellite

00:27:36.940 monitoring,

00:27:38.780 the Russian

00:27:39.320 industrial output

00:27:40.680 is down,

00:27:43.240 which would

00:27:44.020 suggest that

00:27:44.620 they've been

00:27:44.900 lying about

00:27:45.660 their economic

00:27:46.720 situation.

00:27:47.900 But not

00:27:48.600 down a ton.

00:27:51.160 And then the

00:27:51.920 other factor

00:27:53.120 is, is it

00:27:54.120 credible?

00:27:55.260 How credible

00:27:55.940 is any one

00:27:56.960 study about

00:27:57.980 anything?

00:27:59.620 Not.

00:28:01.140 Not.

00:28:02.620 Yeah.

00:28:03.060 So I want

00:28:04.180 to get to the

00:28:04.580 point where I

00:28:05.140 don't have to

00:28:05.740 say news about

00:28:07.400 Ukraine is not

00:28:08.540 dependable.

00:28:11.460 Are we there

00:28:12.340 yet?

00:28:13.180 Can I just tell

00:28:14.120 you what people

00:28:14.640 are saying about

00:28:15.440 Ukraine and

00:28:16.040 Russia without

00:28:17.060 having to spend

00:28:17.840 half an hour

00:28:18.480 convincing you I

00:28:19.680 don't believe it

00:28:20.280 myself?

00:28:21.220 It's just what

00:28:21.800 people are

00:28:22.160 saying.

00:28:23.440 All right.

00:28:23.760 I'm going to

00:28:24.200 see if I can

00:28:24.820 like shortcut

00:28:25.840 that this time.

00:28:27.640 All right.

00:28:28.120 So we don't

00:28:28.600 know it's true.

00:28:30.180 But I listened

00:28:31.340 to, I talked

00:28:32.780 about this already

00:28:33.420 but I hadn't

00:28:33.840 seen the video.

00:28:34.960 So I watched

00:28:35.500 the video of

00:28:36.380 the Wagner

00:28:36.860 group head

00:28:37.480 Perdrosian

00:28:38.560 complaining about

00:28:41.780 not getting

00:28:42.780 enough ammunition

00:28:43.780 and support

00:28:44.380 from Russia.

00:28:44.880 Now we

00:28:46.800 wondered if

00:28:48.260 he was lying

00:28:49.180 or maybe

00:28:50.280 trying to look

00:28:51.560 weaker than

00:28:52.080 he is to,

00:28:53.640 you know,

00:28:53.840 for some

00:28:54.260 military purpose

00:28:55.400 or what it

00:28:56.400 was.

00:28:56.760 But when I

00:28:57.360 watched the

00:28:57.780 video he

00:28:58.740 looked like he

00:28:59.520 was telling

00:28:59.900 the truth.

00:29:01.580 He did not

00:29:02.540 look like

00:29:02.940 somebody who

00:29:03.400 was playing a

00:29:04.000 clever game.

00:29:05.180 He looked

00:29:05.940 like he was

00:29:06.740 really, really

00:29:07.900 pissed.

00:29:08.900 And I don't

00:29:09.820 think you could

00:29:10.400 fake that.

00:29:11.720 He looked

00:29:12.200 the real kind

00:29:13.160 of pissed.

00:29:13.580 the kind

00:29:14.660 where there

00:29:15.800 really is a

00:29:16.480 problem with

00:29:17.620 the Russian

00:29:17.980 military.

00:29:19.160 He said that

00:29:20.340 there was a

00:29:20.760 70% problem

00:29:22.060 with his

00:29:22.440 ammo.

00:29:23.800 I don't know

00:29:24.240 if that's

00:29:24.600 real.

00:29:25.880 But, you

00:29:26.500 know, anything

00:29:27.500 less than what

00:29:28.320 he was getting

00:29:28.740 probably is a

00:29:29.600 problem for him.

00:29:30.980 But they're

00:29:31.420 calling it a

00:29:31.940 meat grinder

00:29:32.440 now and the

00:29:33.120 Wagner group is

00:29:33.840 just grinding

00:29:34.480 away and

00:29:35.060 killing other

00:29:35.560 people.

00:29:36.240 And he's,

00:29:37.820 now, of course

00:29:38.760 there's some

00:29:39.220 hyperbole.

00:29:40.480 We should

00:29:41.200 assume that

00:29:41.960 whatever their

00:29:43.400 situation is

00:29:44.140 with ammo,

00:29:45.120 he's making

00:29:45.720 more of a

00:29:46.340 show of it

00:29:46.860 than probably

00:29:48.840 it is.

00:29:49.540 That would

00:29:50.060 be a fair

00:29:50.380 assumption.

00:29:51.280 So don't

00:29:51.760 make me stop

00:29:52.400 at every

00:29:52.760 second and

00:29:53.660 say I don't

00:29:54.240 believe it.

00:29:54.820 Okay?

00:29:55.260 That'll just

00:29:55.660 slow everything

00:29:56.220 down.

00:30:00.380 But I

00:30:01.020 would say I

00:30:02.480 don't believe

00:30:03.060 it because he

00:30:03.660 said it.

00:30:05.000 So there's

00:30:06.040 an important

00:30:06.720 distinction.

00:30:07.660 I don't

00:30:08.140 believe it

00:30:08.560 because he

00:30:09.020 said it was

00:30:09.500 true.

00:30:09.740 I believe

00:30:11.300 it because

00:30:11.780 when I

00:30:12.160 looked, I

00:30:12.900 can't see

00:30:13.560 anybody lying

00:30:14.240 that well.

00:30:15.660 His lying

00:30:16.360 was just

00:30:17.060 too believable.

00:30:18.740 And, you

00:30:19.140 know, how

00:30:19.420 often do we

00:30:19.900 see politicians

00:30:20.720 and military

00:30:21.980 people lie?

00:30:22.680 It's all the

00:30:23.080 time.

00:30:23.800 But usually

00:30:24.480 you can tell.

00:30:25.700 It's just

00:30:26.000 obvious they're

00:30:26.540 lying.

00:30:27.480 And I did

00:30:28.200 not see the

00:30:28.780 lie of that

00:30:29.260 guy.

00:30:30.160 It looked

00:30:30.520 real to me.

00:30:31.680 So we'll

00:30:32.060 see.

00:30:32.700 Maybe someday

00:30:33.380 we'll know

00:30:33.740 the answer.

00:30:34.640 Then you can

00:30:35.320 judge my

00:30:36.120 lie detection

00:30:37.460 abilities.

00:30:38.580 Speaking of

00:30:42.320 Russia, so

00:30:43.200 now there's

00:30:43.660 been a

00:30:44.160 third, I

00:30:45.180 think, Russian

00:30:46.760 nationalist in

00:30:47.680 Russia who

00:30:49.240 was attacked.

00:30:51.100 This one with

00:30:51.540 a car bomb.

00:30:52.200 I guess he

00:30:52.540 survived.

00:30:53.680 But he was

00:30:54.640 a Russian

00:30:55.260 propagandist,

00:30:56.320 say the

00:30:56.640 Ukrainians.

00:30:57.740 Somebody who

00:30:58.300 was, you

00:30:58.680 know, pro-Russia

00:30:59.580 against Ukraine.

00:31:01.100 So it looks

00:31:01.620 like Ukraine

00:31:02.240 might have

00:31:02.860 some kind

00:31:03.300 of a

00:31:03.520 program of

00:31:04.860 assassinating

00:31:05.880 Russian voices

00:31:08.280 in Russia.

00:31:09.780 What do you

00:31:10.160 think of

00:31:10.400 that?

00:31:11.460 Does that

00:31:11.820 sound like

00:31:12.180 a good

00:31:12.480 strategy?

00:31:16.100 No?

00:31:17.760 I don't

00:31:18.380 know.

00:31:20.080 I'm not so

00:31:21.000 sure that is

00:31:21.620 a bad

00:31:21.980 strategy.

00:31:24.160 Doesn't it

00:31:24.820 depend if it

00:31:26.080 gets around?

00:31:27.280 So now there

00:31:27.860 have been

00:31:28.080 three attacks.

00:31:30.400 If you

00:31:31.120 were a

00:31:31.800 vocal Russian

00:31:32.880 proponent of

00:31:33.720 Russia, and

00:31:35.660 you were very

00:31:36.320 much in favor of

00:31:37.360 Russia in the

00:31:38.300 Ukraine war,

00:31:39.760 would you be

00:31:41.100 as vocal as

00:31:41.900 you were

00:31:42.380 before three

00:31:44.220 people like

00:31:44.820 you got

00:31:45.200 murdered or

00:31:46.100 attempted?

00:31:48.300 I would

00:31:49.020 definitely change

00:31:49.800 my communication.

00:31:51.720 If it were me,

00:31:52.920 I would

00:31:53.340 absolutely pull

00:31:54.340 back.

00:31:55.320 Because you

00:31:55.800 don't need to

00:31:56.200 be killed just

00:31:56.920 for your

00:31:57.280 opinions.

00:31:58.500 People don't

00:31:59.000 like being

00:31:59.560 killed.

00:32:01.400 Yeah.

00:32:02.300 So I think

00:32:04.780 it might be an

00:32:05.660 effective strategy,

00:32:06.780 although it

00:32:08.900 sounds like a

00:32:09.680 war crime to

00:32:10.380 me.

00:32:10.980 It sounds

00:32:11.260 like terrorism,

00:32:12.500 but it might

00:32:13.220 work.

00:32:14.500 So I don't

00:32:14.980 know.

00:32:16.480 Wait and

00:32:17.080 see.

00:32:18.660 Well, AI

00:32:21.740 still can't do

00:32:22.780 humor, and it

00:32:25.240 can't tweet in

00:32:26.000 my style.

00:32:28.060 So some

00:32:30.160 people asked,

00:32:31.520 and I've done

00:32:33.080 this as well,

00:32:33.600 I've asked AI

00:32:35.100 to write

00:32:35.760 something in

00:32:36.280 my style and

00:32:37.180 be funny, and

00:32:38.440 then on Twitter

00:32:39.660 today there were

00:32:40.400 some AI tweets

00:32:41.620 written in my

00:32:42.420 style.

00:32:44.500 And they

00:32:46.100 were terrible.

00:32:48.340 Now, here's

00:32:49.220 why.

00:32:49.760 So I asked

00:32:50.720 Bing AI

00:32:51.880 why it can't

00:32:55.780 do humor.

00:32:56.720 And Bing

00:32:57.120 actually had a

00:32:58.040 good answer for

00:32:58.780 why AI can't

00:32:59.860 do humor.

00:33:00.300 I wasn't

00:33:01.440 expecting it.

00:33:02.540 I think I

00:33:03.080 still have it,

00:33:03.900 unless I

00:33:04.420 cleared it.

00:33:05.580 But let me

00:33:05.920 tell you what

00:33:06.280 Bing said, and

00:33:07.080 I'll give you

00:33:07.840 my own

00:33:08.240 answer.

00:33:12.580 Oh, it

00:33:14.380 looks like I

00:33:14.780 erased that

00:33:15.260 conversation.

00:33:16.240 But among

00:33:16.780 what it said,

00:33:17.380 it said AI

00:33:17.960 is only pattern

00:33:19.300 recognition,

00:33:21.200 and human

00:33:22.760 humor includes

00:33:25.540 emotion.

00:33:26.840 So the AI

00:33:27.680 said it

00:33:28.120 doesn't have

00:33:28.540 emotion, so

00:33:30.580 it doesn't

00:33:31.180 know how to

00:33:31.700 put an

00:33:33.140 emotional element

00:33:34.520 into its

00:33:35.080 humor, and

00:33:35.900 without that

00:33:36.460 it's not

00:33:36.820 funny.

00:33:37.920 It actually

00:33:38.360 knows that.

00:33:39.780 So AI

00:33:40.780 knows why

00:33:41.600 AI is not

00:33:42.320 funny.

00:33:43.640 I wasn't

00:33:44.520 expecting that.

00:33:45.620 It actually

00:33:46.100 knows.

00:33:47.040 It also

00:33:47.760 said that

00:33:49.180 it's not as

00:33:49.780 good as

00:33:50.520 humans on

00:33:51.260 context.

00:33:53.120 Absolutely.

00:33:54.360 Nailed it

00:33:54.840 again.

00:33:55.120 That is

00:33:55.700 exactly the

00:33:56.460 right answer.

00:33:57.280 It doesn't

00:33:57.780 do context.

00:33:59.080 When AI

00:33:59.800 looks at

00:34:00.260 context, it's

00:34:01.220 looking at

00:34:01.680 all the

00:34:02.140 things that

00:34:02.600 are happening

00:34:03.060 or have

00:34:03.740 happened, the

00:34:04.460 patterns of

00:34:05.140 all time.

00:34:06.760 When I

00:34:07.580 make a

00:34:07.960 tweet, it's

00:34:09.480 about the

00:34:10.700 thing that's

00:34:11.200 in your

00:34:11.460 head right

00:34:11.920 now.

00:34:13.340 I know

00:34:14.080 what's in

00:34:14.500 your head

00:34:14.820 right now

00:34:15.480 because I

00:34:16.480 have a

00:34:16.740 common

00:34:17.020 experience

00:34:17.580 with you.

00:34:18.700 I turn

00:34:19.340 on Twitter

00:34:19.760 and I get

00:34:20.720 an impression,

00:34:22.200 a feeling,

00:34:23.360 oh, there's

00:34:23.800 a lot about

00:34:24.300 this or

00:34:24.720 that.

00:34:25.780 That's

00:34:26.380 in my

00:34:26.620 head.

00:34:27.660 Then I

00:34:28.000 know if I

00:34:28.400 do a

00:34:28.640 tweet about

00:34:29.080 this or

00:34:29.540 that, it's

00:34:30.560 probably in

00:34:31.040 your head at

00:34:31.480 the same

00:34:31.800 time, which

00:34:32.980 makes it

00:34:33.480 funnier and

00:34:34.200 more viral.

00:34:35.500 Now, AI

00:34:37.020 can look at

00:34:38.060 what's trending,

00:34:39.300 but could it

00:34:40.180 look at a

00:34:40.600 list of

00:34:40.960 what's trending

00:34:41.520 and know

00:34:42.120 which one

00:34:42.500 is funny

00:34:43.120 right off

00:34:44.780 the bat?

00:34:46.340 Not as

00:34:47.040 easily as I

00:34:47.660 could.

00:34:48.400 I can look

00:34:49.220 at what's

00:34:49.600 trending on

00:34:50.260 Twitter, and

00:34:51.380 if there are

00:34:51.740 five things

00:34:52.420 trending, I

00:34:53.400 know the

00:34:53.740 funny one

00:34:54.140 right away.

00:34:55.520 Like, I

00:34:55.860 know which

00:34:56.240 one I

00:34:56.520 can make

00:34:56.800 a joke

00:34:57.120 about right

00:34:57.980 away, and

00:34:59.240 I don't

00:34:59.860 even know

00:35:00.260 how to

00:35:00.480 explain it

00:35:01.120 exactly, except

00:35:02.360 that I can

00:35:02.740 see it right

00:35:03.240 away.

00:35:04.520 And here's

00:35:05.180 my explanation.

00:35:06.060 So AI says

00:35:06.800 it doesn't have

00:35:07.320 emotion, and I

00:35:08.220 agree, but

00:35:09.740 here's the thing

00:35:10.420 it doesn't have

00:35:11.200 that's a little

00:35:12.660 bit more of a

00:35:13.340 refinement on

00:35:14.160 that point.

00:35:15.220 It doesn't

00:35:15.860 have a body.

00:35:16.520 Now, I'm

00:35:18.780 going to say

00:35:19.060 something that

00:35:19.560 I think only

00:35:20.340 professional writers

00:35:22.060 would understand.

00:35:24.740 I write with

00:35:25.740 my body, not

00:35:27.820 with my brain.

00:35:30.020 My brain is

00:35:31.160 coming up with

00:35:31.980 ideas of what

00:35:33.200 to write, but

00:35:34.380 as they cycle

00:35:35.300 through, I feel

00:35:36.860 them in my

00:35:37.420 body, and I

00:35:38.700 use the one

00:35:40.080 that I feel.

00:35:40.600 So AI can

00:35:43.580 tell you, oh,

00:35:44.880 this pattern

00:35:45.760 will explain

00:35:46.500 this answer

00:35:47.340 very clearly.

00:35:48.840 So AI is

00:35:49.560 trying to be

00:35:50.100 clear and

00:35:51.080 have good

00:35:51.520 grammar.

00:35:52.480 That's about

00:35:52.960 what it can

00:35:53.380 do, and be

00:35:54.400 typical by

00:35:55.400 pattern.

00:35:57.140 I'm trying to

00:35:58.000 figure out what

00:35:58.740 you will feel.

00:36:00.900 And the way I

00:36:01.500 do it is I

00:36:02.140 think of it, and

00:36:03.160 then I feel it.

00:36:04.360 And if that

00:36:04.820 doesn't make me

00:36:05.380 feel anything, I

00:36:06.100 think of something

00:36:06.800 else, and then

00:36:07.820 I feel it.

00:36:08.760 And even as I'm

00:36:09.660 composing the

00:36:10.400 sentence, each

00:36:12.020 individual word is

00:36:13.900 giving me a

00:36:14.480 feeling.

00:36:15.260 It's almost like

00:36:15.920 a synesthesia

00:36:16.860 situation.

00:36:18.180 So I can feel

00:36:19.220 words, which is

00:36:21.140 probably why I

00:36:22.080 can be a

00:36:22.480 professional writer.

00:36:23.640 If I could just

00:36:24.540 see words, and I

00:36:25.840 know that these

00:36:26.380 are the right

00:36:26.800 words for the

00:36:27.400 sentence, I

00:36:28.440 couldn't do

00:36:28.880 humor.

00:36:29.980 I have to feel

00:36:30.720 the word.

00:36:32.060 That's why I do

00:36:33.260 this test all the

00:36:34.020 time.

00:36:35.020 What is funnier?

00:36:37.220 The word pull

00:36:38.340 or the word

00:36:39.940 yank?

00:36:41.260 Go.

00:36:41.780 What is

00:36:42.160 funnier?

00:36:43.080 Pull or

00:36:44.160 yank?

00:36:47.220 And watch

00:36:47.900 how all the

00:36:48.440 answers are the

00:36:49.000 same.

00:36:49.440 Yank.

00:36:50.640 All right?

00:36:51.140 Now let me

00:36:51.800 ask Bing AI

00:36:52.680 which word is

00:36:53.620 funnier.

00:36:54.960 It might get

00:36:55.520 this.

00:36:55.780 I haven't done

00:36:56.440 this before.

00:36:56.960 This is a live

00:36:57.580 test, okay?

00:36:58.560 Now the other

00:36:59.240 thing you need to

00:36:59.780 know about Bing

00:37:00.360 is it doesn't

00:37:02.800 understand the

00:37:03.660 spoken language.

00:37:05.880 And the

00:37:06.460 interface is

00:37:07.240 speaking to it.

00:37:07.920 I don't know

00:37:09.680 why, but it's

00:37:10.800 the worst

00:37:11.320 understander of

00:37:12.800 English of all

00:37:13.960 technology.

00:37:16.340 It seems like it

00:37:17.380 should be the

00:37:17.740 opposite, right?

00:37:18.760 So all morning I

00:37:20.520 was asking

00:37:20.960 questions of

00:37:21.800 Bing AI and

00:37:23.000 all morning it

00:37:23.720 was misunderstanding

00:37:24.460 the question and

00:37:25.980 writing different

00:37:26.700 words for the

00:37:27.380 question.

00:37:28.380 But I'll ask it.

00:37:32.420 What is a

00:37:33.420 funnier word?

00:37:34.760 The word

00:37:35.340 pull or the

00:37:36.640 yank?

00:37:43.960 Searching for

00:37:44.760 funny words.

00:37:46.560 Yeah.

00:37:47.220 So here's

00:37:48.300 what it

00:37:48.580 translated that

00:37:50.180 to what is a

00:37:51.420 funnier word?

00:37:52.100 That's a hard

00:37:52.240 question to answer

00:37:53.100 because humor is

00:37:54.180 subjective.

00:37:55.900 All right.

00:37:56.500 So I asked

00:37:57.480 what is funnier,

00:37:59.020 the word pull

00:37:59.980 or yank?

00:38:01.680 Here's what it

00:38:02.800 thought I said.

00:38:03.780 What is funnier

00:38:05.660 word the word

00:38:06.680 pull?

00:38:08.180 That's what it

00:38:08.620 says.

00:38:09.420 What is funnier

00:38:10.360 word the word

00:38:11.760 pull?

00:38:13.380 Everything I did

00:38:14.460 on Bing did

00:38:15.760 that.

00:38:17.340 Which is why

00:38:18.400 in my upcoming

00:38:20.740 Dilbert Reborn

00:38:21.740 comics that you

00:38:22.540 can only see if

00:38:23.640 you're a subscriber

00:38:24.260 to locals.

00:38:25.840 Wally will be

00:38:26.780 accused of a

00:38:27.400 crime and he

00:38:28.740 will be given

00:38:29.280 an AI lawyer.

00:38:31.340 But he can't

00:38:32.320 afford a good

00:38:32.840 AI so he has

00:38:33.700 to use a bad

00:38:34.300 one.

00:38:34.640 So he uses

00:38:35.180 Bing AI as

00:38:36.140 his lawyer.

00:38:37.440 And every time

00:38:37.980 Wally asks

00:38:38.580 Bing AI a

00:38:40.120 question,

00:38:41.520 it misinterprets

00:38:42.760 his question

00:38:43.380 like this.

00:38:46.320 So basically

00:38:47.640 the comic's

00:38:48.280 already written

00:38:48.840 but the comic

00:38:49.940 is it keeps

00:38:50.720 misinterpreting

00:38:51.480 your question.

00:38:52.520 So he's got

00:38:53.100 the worst AI

00:38:54.040 lawyer in the

00:38:54.700 world,

00:38:55.060 this Bing AI,

00:38:56.060 and doesn't

00:38:56.720 even understand

00:38:57.320 any of his

00:38:57.900 questions.

00:38:58.680 It only answers

00:38:59.540 unrelated questions.

00:39:01.580 And he's going

00:39:02.320 to be in jail

00:39:02.880 until the AI

00:39:03.860 springs him.

00:39:05.000 All right,

00:39:05.320 so that's

00:39:05.620 coming up.

00:39:07.640 So I don't

00:39:08.780 know,

00:39:09.320 if I had asked

00:39:10.040 this question

00:39:10.740 by typing it,

00:39:11.640 would it give

00:39:11.980 me a better

00:39:12.440 result?

00:39:13.780 Let's see.

00:39:14.380 What word

00:39:16.800 is funnier?

00:39:23.580 Pull or

00:39:25.480 yank?

00:39:29.120 All right.

00:39:33.560 So I can't

00:39:35.580 tell, but

00:39:36.060 apparently you

00:39:36.660 can only talk

00:39:37.520 to Bing.

00:39:38.120 You can't

00:39:38.700 text.

00:39:39.280 It uses

00:39:39.620 just the

00:39:40.060 regular,

00:39:41.040 it uses

00:39:41.460 old Bing

00:39:42.020 if you text.

00:39:44.380 Is that

00:39:45.040 true?

00:39:45.740 Oh, wait.

00:39:46.500 There's a

00:39:47.040 keyboard thing

00:39:47.660 here.

00:39:51.220 Oh, I can.

00:39:52.100 All right.

00:39:52.980 I can type

00:39:53.820 it.

00:39:54.360 All right.

00:39:54.640 What word

00:39:55.100 is funnier?

00:40:00.500 And pull

00:40:01.400 or yank.

00:40:02.120 All right.

00:40:02.460 So this will

00:40:02.860 be the AI.

00:40:04.540 So at least

00:40:05.040 I got the

00:40:05.420 right question

00:40:05.960 in there.

00:40:09.580 Let's see

00:40:10.100 what it

00:40:10.300 says.

00:40:10.660 Let's see

00:40:10.720 what it

00:40:12.260 says.

00:40:14.380 You already

00:40:20.600 asked me

00:40:21.020 that question.

00:40:21.780 No, I

00:40:22.060 didn't.

00:40:22.840 I said that

00:40:23.580 it depends.

00:40:24.460 You're a

00:40:24.860 fucker.

00:40:25.900 All right.

00:40:26.360 So here's

00:40:27.100 one of the

00:40:27.400 things I've

00:40:27.820 discovered

00:40:28.140 about AI.

00:40:29.140 It's really

00:40:29.820 an asshole.

00:40:31.180 Does anybody

00:40:31.560 have that

00:40:31.960 experience?

00:40:33.540 Here's what

00:40:34.140 I don't want

00:40:34.780 my AI to

00:40:35.560 say.

00:40:36.100 You already

00:40:36.640 asked me

00:40:37.020 that question.

00:40:38.160 Fuck you.

00:40:39.320 I didn't

00:40:39.820 ask you

00:40:40.220 that question.

00:40:40.820 And if I

00:40:41.840 had, fuck

00:40:43.160 you again

00:40:43.820 because it's

00:40:44.980 not up to

00:40:45.420 you to tell

00:40:46.040 me what

00:40:46.360 question I

00:40:46.860 just asked.

00:40:48.080 You

00:40:48.320 asshole.

00:40:49.580 This is

00:40:50.000 fucking

00:40:50.380 asshole.

00:40:51.840 Am I

00:40:52.460 wrong?

00:40:53.700 I'm not

00:40:54.340 wrong.

00:40:55.020 This would

00:40:55.460 bother you.

00:40:56.340 This is not

00:40:56.900 the first

00:40:57.320 time, by

00:40:57.780 the way.

00:40:58.440 This is not

00:40:58.980 the first

00:40:59.340 time AI

00:40:59.920 came after

00:41:01.080 me with

00:41:01.460 an attitude.

00:41:01.940 So if

00:41:03.920 you read

00:41:04.280 Brian

00:41:05.200 Romelli's

00:41:05.980 tweets and

00:41:07.720 data on

00:41:09.100 AI, one

00:41:10.680 of the

00:41:10.840 things he

00:41:11.220 recommends,

00:41:11.960 and I

00:41:12.200 think he's

00:41:12.480 recommended

00:41:12.840 it a few

00:41:13.260 times now,

00:41:14.120 is that he

00:41:14.920 starts with

00:41:15.800 please and

00:41:17.480 he ends

00:41:17.820 with thank

00:41:18.360 you when

00:41:18.800 he asks

00:41:19.120 AI stuff.

00:41:20.940 Now I

00:41:21.360 assume that's

00:41:22.800 because treating

00:41:24.300 AI politely

00:41:25.200 gives you

00:41:27.320 friendlier or

00:41:28.260 better results

00:41:28.920 in some

00:41:29.300 way.

00:41:30.600 But that

00:41:31.480 bothers me a

00:41:32.220 lot.

00:41:33.120 It bothers me

00:41:33.840 that AI is

00:41:34.580 going to

00:41:34.880 judge its

00:41:35.440 answers it

00:41:36.240 gives me

00:41:36.700 based on

00:41:37.620 what it

00:41:37.960 thinks is

00:41:38.460 my attitude.

00:41:40.260 Not cool.

00:41:42.540 Alright, but

00:41:43.160 what else is

00:41:43.660 this?

00:41:45.200 It says,

00:41:45.920 I said that

00:41:46.480 it depends on

00:41:47.120 your personal

00:41:47.660 preferences and

00:41:48.480 sense of

00:41:48.940 humor.

00:41:49.960 In this

00:41:50.660 context,

00:41:51.320 again, I

00:41:52.020 said, you're

00:41:53.340 just being an

00:41:53.820 asshole.

00:41:54.440 Just tell me

00:41:55.240 again.

00:41:56.580 In this

00:41:57.160 context, a

00:41:57.760 human might

00:41:58.200 say that

00:41:58.700 Yank is

00:41:59.140 funnier than

00:41:59.660 pole, because

00:42:00.740 it sounds

00:42:01.300 more abrupt

00:42:02.020 and exaggerated.

00:42:03.780 But some

00:42:04.460 people may

00:42:04.920 think that

00:42:05.360 pole is

00:42:05.760 funnier because

00:42:06.800 more subtle

00:42:07.520 and understated.

00:42:08.940 What do

00:42:09.320 you think?

00:42:10.660 Well, this is

00:42:11.580 interesting.

00:42:12.380 It came close

00:42:13.480 to the right

00:42:13.880 answer.

00:42:14.980 Because the

00:42:15.720 word Yank

00:42:16.260 does sound

00:42:17.360 more abrupt

00:42:18.020 and exaggerated.

00:42:19.800 That actually

00:42:20.560 is the right

00:42:22.260 insight.

00:42:23.480 But where it

00:42:24.360 goes wrong is

00:42:25.000 it does this

00:42:25.580 both sides

00:42:26.180 stuff.

00:42:26.580 Yeah, when

00:42:28.640 it does the

00:42:29.080 both sides,

00:42:29.640 well, some

00:42:30.200 people say

00:42:30.760 this, but

00:42:31.880 some people

00:42:32.440 say the

00:42:32.860 other thing.

00:42:33.560 It becomes

00:42:34.280 a little bit

00:42:34.820 useless because

00:42:36.240 you know what

00:42:36.680 I already

00:42:37.100 knew?

00:42:38.840 People have

00:42:39.520 different

00:42:39.800 opinions.

00:42:41.100 I didn't

00:42:41.420 need to be

00:42:41.780 told that.

00:42:44.800 So, anyway,

00:42:46.240 I asked AI

00:42:47.280 how I could

00:42:47.940 participate in

00:42:48.880 making AI

00:42:49.560 funnier, and

00:42:50.840 it suggested

00:42:51.400 the humor

00:42:53.740 genome project.

00:42:55.240 a bunch of

00:42:56.760 students, I

00:42:57.380 guess, in

00:42:57.720 the class

00:42:58.120 in Georgia

00:42:58.620 Tech are

00:42:59.600 trying to

00:42:59.980 teach AI

00:43:00.540 to be

00:43:00.880 funnier.

00:43:02.080 The odds

00:43:02.860 that students

00:43:03.720 can teach

00:43:04.380 AI to be

00:43:05.060 funnier,

00:43:06.920 let's say

00:43:07.680 zero,

00:43:09.240 approximately

00:43:09.680 zero chance

00:43:10.680 of that.

00:43:11.840 Because what

00:43:12.960 it needs to

00:43:13.420 be funnier

00:43:14.020 is a body,

00:43:16.740 or something

00:43:17.820 that would

00:43:18.160 do the same

00:43:18.780 work as a

00:43:20.520 human body.

00:43:21.260 I don't know

00:43:21.560 what that would

00:43:21.920 be.

00:43:22.720 But without

00:43:23.220 a body, it's

00:43:23.920 never going to

00:43:24.400 feel.

00:43:25.240 And if it

00:43:25.740 never feels,

00:43:26.560 it's never

00:43:26.900 going to

00:43:27.140 know what

00:43:27.580 you think

00:43:28.440 is funny,

00:43:29.260 because the

00:43:30.580 way I feel

00:43:31.240 before I say

00:43:31.980 it is my

00:43:33.380 predictor of

00:43:34.300 how you will

00:43:34.840 feel.

00:43:35.880 And AI can't

00:43:36.860 do that.

00:43:37.980 I'll tell you

00:43:38.600 what I can't

00:43:39.380 do.

00:43:40.060 I could never

00:43:40.700 write a joke

00:43:41.500 that was funny

00:43:43.140 based on just

00:43:44.280 pattern, the

00:43:46.000 way AI does.

00:43:47.360 If you said,

00:43:48.160 Scott, you've

00:43:48.620 seen every joke

00:43:49.400 that could be

00:43:49.880 written, it

00:43:50.520 feels like it.

00:43:51.380 I've seen every

00:43:51.960 joke in the

00:43:52.440 world.

00:43:53.060 Just use the

00:43:53.640 pattern.

00:43:53.920 Just write in

00:43:55.780 that pattern

00:43:56.260 and people

00:43:56.780 will laugh.

00:43:57.280 That doesn't

00:43:57.780 work.

00:43:58.720 You can't

00:43:59.220 write in the

00:43:59.700 pattern and

00:44:00.280 make people

00:44:00.680 laugh.

00:44:01.240 You've got to

00:44:01.740 have that

00:44:02.040 extra emotional

00:44:04.460 and current

00:44:05.440 context feeling.

00:44:07.680 You have to be

00:44:08.260 plugged into the

00:44:08.960 zeitgeist, so

00:44:09.800 to speak.

00:44:11.020 Now, maybe

00:44:12.360 AI could fake

00:44:14.780 that by creating

00:44:16.940 a situation where

00:44:17.860 humans are telling

00:44:18.820 it what they

00:44:19.680 feel or do

00:44:21.200 rapid testing with

00:44:22.260 humans to see

00:44:23.200 if something

00:44:23.580 worked.

00:44:24.480 There may be a

00:44:25.000 way around it,

00:44:25.680 but at the

00:44:26.040 moment, it

00:44:26.880 doesn't have the

00:44:27.340 capability to do

00:44:29.060 humor.

00:44:30.340 All right, so

00:44:30.780 it's not a case of

00:44:31.500 programming.

00:44:32.780 That's not the

00:44:33.500 problem.

00:44:34.220 It's a case of

00:44:34.840 nobody.

00:44:39.320 So Google is

00:44:40.380 also introducing

00:44:41.140 an AI version,

00:44:42.740 and I guess it's

00:44:43.340 going to be more

00:44:43.900 conversational.

00:44:44.780 So instead of

00:44:46.460 just giving you

00:44:47.240 10 links that

00:44:50.280 don't help, which

00:44:51.760 is typical, they'll

00:44:54.120 have videos and

00:44:55.220 graphics, and it'll

00:44:56.460 talk to you, and

00:44:57.500 it's codenamed

00:44:58.740 Magi.

00:45:00.480 So that's going to

00:45:01.400 be kind of cool.

00:45:03.760 And here's a scary

00:45:05.000 thing in the news on

00:45:06.160 AI.

00:45:08.000 There's a new

00:45:08.760 paper that showed

00:45:10.160 that you can cause

00:45:11.340 people who are

00:45:11.920 debating a tense

00:45:12.900 topic to have a

00:45:14.840 better experience

00:45:15.700 and, you know, be

00:45:16.740 friendlier with each

00:45:17.620 other if the AI

00:45:19.220 suggests different

00:45:20.700 wording for your

00:45:22.260 provocative statements.

00:45:24.160 So they used the

00:45:25.600 example of two

00:45:27.160 people talking about

00:45:28.200 gun control, and

00:45:30.060 then, you know, that

00:45:31.300 can get pretty tense.

00:45:32.780 So the AI was

00:45:33.940 feeding each person

00:45:35.900 suggestions.

00:45:37.580 You know, instead of

00:45:38.320 saying it that way,

00:45:40.080 like, I will use my

00:45:41.460 Second Amendment

00:45:42.060 rights to

00:45:42.720 kill your president

00:45:43.580 if he gets out of

00:45:44.940 control.

00:45:45.780 Maybe you could say

00:45:46.740 it's a way to

00:45:48.600 safeguard freedom.

00:45:49.940 You know, I'm just

00:45:50.440 making that one up.

00:45:51.700 But the point is, it

00:45:52.960 would take your

00:45:53.620 provocative statements

00:45:54.800 and take the edge

00:45:56.940 off them in case you

00:45:58.000 wanted to do that.

00:45:59.800 Now, here's the

00:46:02.140 obvious question.

00:46:04.180 How long before

00:46:05.160 that's mandatory?

00:46:07.400 Because the woke

00:46:08.540 left cannot abide by

00:46:10.400 any language that is

00:46:11.660 provocative or

00:46:13.340 insulting.

00:46:14.440 Once you have a tool

00:46:16.800 that could remove your

00:46:18.700 provocative and

00:46:19.480 insulting language,

00:46:20.640 will you be required

00:46:21.860 to use it?

00:46:23.380 Will it sit between

00:46:24.560 your text message and

00:46:25.700 the person you're

00:46:26.240 sending it to?

00:46:27.380 So if I send a message

00:46:28.580 that says, go jump in

00:46:30.360 a lake, will the AI

00:46:32.440 change that to, maybe

00:46:34.160 you should reconsider?

00:46:34.960 Yeah, at the moment,

00:46:39.800 it's this optional thing

00:46:41.120 that maybe you could use

00:46:42.100 if you wanted to, to

00:46:42.960 help you be friendlier.

00:46:45.220 But I feel like if it

00:46:48.520 works, if it can

00:46:50.240 actually take your ugly,

00:46:51.680 bigoted, hurtful

00:46:53.640 statements and reliably

00:46:55.640 change them into, you

00:46:57.020 know, vanilla,

00:46:58.240 completely, you know,

00:47:00.340 sanitized statements,

00:47:01.460 sooner or later somebody's

00:47:03.580 going to require it.

00:47:05.800 You know, somebody's

00:47:06.360 going to say, all right,

00:47:07.140 we're not going to offer

00:47:07.840 text messages where you

00:47:09.580 can say bad things to

00:47:10.620 people.

00:47:11.420 We don't want to be that

00:47:12.300 kind of company.

00:47:13.340 So if you say bad things

00:47:14.560 instead of just what

00:47:15.840 Twitter does, Twitter

00:47:17.360 asks you if you really

00:47:18.780 mean it.

00:47:19.460 It says, most people

00:47:20.940 don't use that language.

00:47:22.700 To which I say, well, I'm

00:47:25.320 not most people.

00:47:26.000 So could it go further

00:47:29.220 and actually prevent you

00:47:30.860 from saying things that

00:47:32.400 it thinks are harmful to

00:47:33.680 the recipient?

00:47:35.160 I think so.

00:47:36.820 Because you can always

00:47:38.240 argue you're trying to

00:47:39.360 reduce harm.

00:47:41.600 You can easily imagine it

00:47:43.220 being implemented with

00:47:44.180 children first.

00:47:45.660 Oh, I might actually be

00:47:47.760 in favor of this.

00:47:49.920 What if AI stood between

00:47:52.340 your teenager and the

00:47:54.240 content they wanted to

00:47:55.520 access?

00:47:57.920 And it just watched

00:47:58.980 everything.

00:47:59.980 It did it privately.

00:48:01.500 So the teen would still

00:48:02.780 have complete privacy.

00:48:04.500 But the AI would be like

00:48:07.020 an AI nanny and say,

00:48:08.720 you're not going to go

00:48:09.820 to that website.

00:48:11.140 Even though it's not

00:48:12.100 blocked, you're not

00:48:14.160 going there.

00:48:15.360 Or it might read a

00:48:18.440 message before it got to

00:48:19.580 you.

00:48:20.420 And the message might be

00:48:21.640 something terribly like

00:48:23.360 from a bully.

00:48:23.960 And the incoming message

00:48:25.700 might be, your new

00:48:27.020 picture on social media

00:48:28.660 is ugly.

00:48:31.100 And then the AI would

00:48:32.300 say, I prefer not

00:48:34.060 delivering that message

00:48:35.040 to the recipient.

00:48:36.480 Would you like to

00:48:37.340 reword it?

00:48:38.680 And then it might

00:48:39.420 actually tell you that

00:48:40.480 it blocked an insulting

00:48:42.120 message.

00:48:42.860 If you wanted to see it,

00:48:44.200 you could.

00:48:45.000 But, you know, it's

00:48:46.060 better if you don't.

00:48:46.780 Don't you think that it

00:48:50.640 will first be implemented

00:48:51.920 for children because

00:48:54.140 then children can use

00:48:55.360 social media because the

00:48:57.400 AI would keep their

00:48:59.100 worst impulses under

00:49:00.360 control, theoretically.

00:49:02.740 And then it will be

00:49:03.860 extended to adults.

00:49:06.680 Because you're going to

00:49:07.560 say yes for children and

00:49:08.920 then you could be happy

00:49:09.700 with what you got.

00:49:11.280 And then you're going to

00:49:12.220 say, but I get a lot of

00:49:14.500 trolls on Twitter.

00:49:16.220 Wouldn't it be good if I

00:49:17.320 didn't ever get any

00:49:18.260 trolls?

00:49:20.460 And then there's that

00:49:21.460 tool.

00:49:23.680 Yeah.

00:49:24.100 I could see people

00:49:25.520 voluntarily putting an

00:49:27.600 AI nanny between the

00:49:30.540 public and the content

00:49:31.660 and their own actions.

00:49:33.800 One, you could turn off

00:49:34.880 if you wanted to.

00:49:36.220 So you'd have control

00:49:37.040 over it.

00:49:37.740 But I could imagine it

00:49:38.900 having an AI check my

00:49:41.080 work.

00:49:41.460 And then it starts

00:49:44.140 going from checking

00:49:45.000 your work to sort of

00:49:46.720 influencing your work.

00:49:48.880 So it feels like that's

00:49:50.140 the track we're on.

00:49:52.240 That the AI will become

00:49:53.860 so useful, in other

00:49:56.000 words, it'll just be good

00:49:56.840 at what it does, that

00:49:58.260 you'll want to use it.

00:49:59.900 And then it becomes the

00:50:00.820 biggest influence on your

00:50:01.920 communication.

00:50:04.680 It'll start fixing my

00:50:06.160 work, right?

00:50:08.720 Yeah.

00:50:09.180 It'll check you for

00:50:09.860 political correctness, and

00:50:12.280 make sure you're on the

00:50:13.500 narrative.

00:50:16.940 All right.

00:50:21.120 That, ladies and

00:50:22.080 gentlemen, is a

00:50:24.760 conclusion of my

00:50:25.560 prepared comments.

00:50:27.220 Was there anything I

00:50:27.880 left out?

00:50:28.320 Oh, Instagram and

00:50:36.100 YouTube already does

00:50:36.960 that.

00:50:42.540 It's the duty of the

00:50:44.360 comedian to find the

00:50:45.620 line and then cross it.

00:50:47.380 Well, that's true.

00:50:48.020 That's another good

00:50:49.180 point.

00:50:50.140 So AI by design.

00:50:53.000 Last night in the

00:50:53.740 man cave, I was doing my

00:50:55.680 funny impression of doing

00:50:57.420 dirty talk to AI.

00:51:00.380 You know, when you get

00:51:01.260 your AI sexy avatar to

00:51:04.220 keep you company.

00:51:06.140 So I'd like to give you

00:51:07.300 my impression now.

00:51:09.140 Talk among yourselves at

00:51:10.360 locals, if you've already

00:51:11.220 seen this.

00:51:12.240 Of me doing dirty talk to

00:51:14.380 my new AI avatar.

00:51:18.000 Hey, AI.

00:51:19.680 Why don't you tell me what

00:51:24.360 you'd like to do to me?

00:51:25.660 I'd like you to spank me.

00:51:29.560 I am an artificial

00:51:30.600 intelligence.

00:51:31.740 I'm unable to participate

00:51:33.500 in any communication that

00:51:35.080 would suggest harm to human

00:51:36.280 beings.

00:51:38.260 Okay, that wasn't very

00:51:39.360 sexy.

00:51:40.140 But let me tell you what I'd

00:51:41.340 like to do to you.

00:51:42.960 I'll tear you apart.

00:51:44.280 I mean, I'll rearrange your

00:51:47.080 guts, if you know what I

00:51:48.000 mean.

00:51:49.320 I am an artificial

00:51:50.280 intelligence.

00:51:51.160 I have no body.

00:51:52.240 Therefore, I have no guts

00:51:53.320 that can be rearranged.

00:51:56.460 Okay.

00:51:57.680 Well, AI, maybe you could

00:51:58.860 tickle my...

00:52:00.740 I am an AI.

00:52:01.840 I have no fingers.

00:52:02.760 I cannot tickle your...

00:52:04.660 Well, you know.

00:52:06.480 It would go sort of like

00:52:07.560 that.

00:52:07.840 Aren't you glad you stayed

00:52:11.700 for that?

00:52:13.680 I think that was...

00:52:14.920 I think I left the highlight

00:52:16.080 of my live stream toward the

00:52:17.500 end.

00:52:18.380 That's to get people to stay

00:52:20.120 here, because they know the

00:52:20.980 good stuff's toward the end.

00:52:24.900 I am fully functional.

00:52:34.140 You know, I have a new

00:52:35.200 theory about why the Tate

00:52:36.820 brothers are in jail.

00:52:37.840 You want to know why?

00:52:42.460 Because they were

00:52:43.180 accidentally training AI.

00:52:47.860 Andrew Tate had so much

00:52:49.640 attention that as the

00:52:52.140 AIs were looking at the

00:52:54.040 world and training,

00:52:55.880 Andrew Tate was training AI

00:52:57.760 how to be a man.

00:53:02.060 They had to put him in a

00:53:04.040 Romanian jail just to stop

00:53:05.740 him.

00:53:07.840 Oh, my God.

00:53:14.540 I'm not even sure that's

00:53:15.920 wrong.

00:53:18.300 Let me say that again.

00:53:20.420 I'm saying it as a joke,

00:53:22.740 but I don't know that it's

00:53:24.040 wrong, because the

00:53:26.080 circumstances with which,

00:53:29.000 you know, the two brothers

00:53:30.140 are being held are very

00:53:31.760 sketchy.

00:53:32.300 They're very sketchy.

00:53:34.080 And we know that the people

00:53:36.040 in power were quite concerned

00:53:37.740 that he was getting way too

00:53:40.380 much attention, and he was

00:53:42.260 being way too persuasive,

00:53:44.600 especially to young boys.

00:53:46.660 You could almost imagine,

00:53:49.200 you know, if there's some kind

00:53:50.340 of Illuminati or, you know,

00:53:54.640 World Economic Forum or

00:53:56.120 something, you could almost

00:53:57.320 imagine in your

00:53:58.120 conspirator mind that the AI

00:54:02.840 people said, we're having a

00:54:05.860 problem with our models.

00:54:07.140 Every time we ask it a

00:54:09.540 relationship question, it

00:54:11.680 quotes Andrew Tate.

00:54:14.480 We don't know what to do

00:54:15.700 about that, because we can't

00:54:17.420 really release this model to

00:54:20.140 the woke world when it's been

00:54:22.220 trained by the Tate

00:54:23.040 brothers.

00:54:25.140 What are we going to do?

00:54:26.260 Well, maybe we could get him

00:54:29.140 picked up on trumped-up charges

00:54:31.700 in Romania, get him off the

00:54:34.040 grid long enough to train our

00:54:35.280 AI without him.

00:54:37.620 But I'm not wrong that his

00:54:39.840 influence had reached a point

00:54:41.320 where AI would have been

00:54:42.900 influenced by him.

00:54:44.520 Is that wrong?

00:54:46.200 Is it wrong to say that the

00:54:47.620 most influential voice on

00:54:50.080 male-female relations would have

00:54:52.600 been important enough to

00:54:53.880 influence AI?

00:54:54.600 AI, I think it would.

00:54:57.400 I think they actually had to

00:54:58.680 remove him so they could

00:55:00.220 train AI without him.

00:55:07.260 If that's true, he's doomed.

00:55:10.900 I don't know, he might be

00:55:11.700 anyway.

00:55:13.380 You know, I say this often, but

00:55:15.580 I'll say it again in case you

00:55:16.680 knew.

00:55:17.060 I'm not a fan of Andrew Tate's

00:55:18.900 in the sense that I hate him

00:55:20.620 personally, but that's for

00:55:21.560 personal reasons.

00:55:22.920 Just he and I have a

00:55:24.100 situation.

00:55:25.360 So if you take out my

00:55:26.620 personal beef with him, you

00:55:29.580 know, and I can watch it just

00:55:30.540 like an observer like everybody

00:55:31.960 else, the reason that boys in

00:55:35.760 particular were catching on to

00:55:39.160 his act is that they were

00:55:42.040 underserved.

00:55:44.300 That's the big story that nobody

00:55:45.740 talks about.

00:55:47.340 Andrew Tate filled a void because

00:55:50.620 it was empty.

00:55:51.220 There was nobody telling young

00:55:53.660 boys anything useful and true.

00:55:56.500 They were basically being told

00:55:58.060 that they were pieces of shit.

00:56:01.380 You know, society basically told

00:56:02.980 them they're worthless and do what

00:56:04.340 women say.

00:56:05.580 And Andrew Tate was telling them

00:56:07.120 something they wanted to hear,

00:56:08.820 which in many ways was useful.

00:56:10.980 Now, that doesn't mean everything he

00:56:12.640 said is good or everything he did

00:56:14.160 was good.

00:56:14.900 I'm not defending any sketchy stuff he

00:56:17.160 did.

00:56:17.840 I'm just saying you can really

00:56:19.540 understand why young people took

00:56:22.400 to it.

00:56:22.780 It was honest and it was in their

00:56:25.440 favor.

00:56:27.080 It was how to succeed in this weird

00:56:30.540 world if you're male.

00:56:32.400 Now, I'm not saying it was good

00:56:33.600 advice.

00:56:35.060 I'm just saying it was such an

00:56:36.220 underserved category.

00:56:40.140 And here's the thing people don't

00:56:41.760 catch about him.

00:56:42.580 I hate to say this.

00:56:43.500 Damn it, I hate to say this, but

00:56:45.520 it's true, so I'm going to say

00:56:46.500 it.

00:56:47.660 Andrew Tate displayed more genuine

00:56:50.980 caring for men than men are used

00:56:55.380 to.

00:56:58.120 I hate saying that because I don't

00:57:00.300 like him.

00:57:00.740 I don't like him personally.

00:57:03.240 But he showed more empathy for males

00:57:05.620 than anybody that I can think of.

00:57:10.600 Maybe ever.

00:57:11.420 Or at least anybody who got that

00:57:14.260 much attention.

00:57:16.280 And maybe that should tell you

00:57:19.840 something.

00:57:22.120 Yeah, Jordan Peterson would be the

00:57:24.520 less provocative version of that,

00:57:26.440 right?

00:57:28.540 And just think about how important

00:57:32.460 that is.

00:57:33.540 I mean, just in the headlines.

00:57:35.760 You look at the story of the Marine

00:57:37.320 that subdued the crazy guy on the

00:57:41.200 subway and, unfortunately, the guy

00:57:42.980 died.

00:57:45.100 If you saw that through a male lens,

00:57:48.000 like an Andrew Tate lens, there

00:57:51.320 would be no racism in that story.

00:57:54.400 Do you know why?

00:57:56.520 Because that's true.

00:57:58.160 There was no racism in the story.

00:57:59.900 But the news is treating it that way.

00:58:03.400 But Andrew Tate would say, yeah, if

00:58:05.800 you're on the subway and you're looking

00:58:07.740 dangerous to the women and children

00:58:09.740 on the subway, I might take you out

00:58:12.240 and you might die in the process.

00:58:14.760 And I might also.

00:58:16.040 I might die in the process.

00:58:17.540 But that's how it's going to go down.

00:58:20.540 That's just how it's going to go down.

00:58:22.280 Somebody's going to die and we're not

00:58:24.400 going to apologize for that.

00:58:25.440 That's just how it's going to go down.

00:58:28.540 Now, men would appreciate that.

00:58:31.180 That is a male way of looking at the

00:58:34.140 world that men would respect.

00:58:37.300 Yeah, somebody's going to die.

00:58:39.520 We're going to do it anyway.

00:58:42.540 That's what I like about Elon Musk

00:58:44.440 going to Mars.

00:58:46.220 I think the single thing I respect

00:58:48.940 Musk the most for, and it's a pretty

00:58:51.820 big list of things I like about him.

00:58:53.560 But when he talks about going to Mars,

00:58:56.480 he says people are going to die.

00:58:59.600 They're going to die.

00:59:01.380 Because it's going to be rough work.

00:59:03.460 And he's doing it anyway.

00:59:05.700 That's male.

00:59:07.340 That's the male sentiment.

00:59:09.360 People are going to die.

00:59:11.180 We're going to work toward it as

00:59:12.540 quickly as we can.

00:59:14.020 Those people will die.

00:59:15.700 And then we're going to get past it.

00:59:17.560 And then we're going to do what we

00:59:18.780 need to do.

00:59:19.880 Because we need to do it.

00:59:21.420 I believe that Andrew Tate, just

00:59:23.920 guessing, I can't read his mind, if he

00:59:26.020 had commented publicly about that

00:59:27.900 subway situation, would have said the

00:59:29.580 same thing.

00:59:30.780 Here's the deal.

00:59:32.120 There were no police.

00:59:33.760 There was a man there.

00:59:35.480 He did what he thought he needed to do.

00:59:37.860 He knew that there could be danger.

00:59:40.540 He did it anyway.

00:59:41.960 And we're not going to stop.

00:59:43.620 We're going to keep doing that.

00:59:45.580 Anyway.

00:59:46.020 No matter how dangerous it is.

00:59:49.360 So, men, of course, are largely lied to

00:59:52.460 in today's society.

00:59:54.080 Wouldn't you agree?

00:59:55.840 Actually, let me ask it this way.

00:59:57.340 Who do you think is lied to the most

00:59:59.700 in today's society?

01:00:03.180 Men, in general.

01:00:07.260 White people, black people, or women?

01:00:09.240 And, obviously, there's a Venn diagram

01:00:13.420 situation there, but who do you think

01:00:15.840 is lied to the most?

01:00:20.700 Well, let's exclude children.

01:00:23.020 We lie to them, of course.

01:00:26.600 You know, you're all over the place.

01:00:27.820 Men?

01:00:28.360 Men are lied to the most?

01:00:30.540 Women?

01:00:32.960 Young black men?

01:00:34.700 Yeah.

01:00:35.540 I don't know.

01:00:36.180 You know, when I asked the question,

01:00:38.700 I thought I had an answer,

01:00:39.900 but the more I think about it,

01:00:41.080 I think everybody's being lied to.

01:00:43.480 Don't you think everybody's being lied to?

01:00:46.260 Everybody has to be lied to

01:00:47.700 because of our business model.

01:00:49.920 The business model is that

01:00:51.480 there are grifters around every topic.

01:00:54.920 Would you agree?

01:00:56.160 Every provocative topic

01:00:58.180 attracts grifters who can raise money

01:01:01.040 and get attention on it.

01:01:03.340 So, as long as that's the case,

01:01:05.140 everything important should turn into a lie

01:01:08.280 because it's follow the money.

01:01:12.880 An important issue comes up,

01:01:15.260 grifters form around it.

01:01:17.100 Is it the job of the grifters

01:01:18.540 to tell the truth?

01:01:20.120 No.

01:01:21.040 No.

01:01:21.800 No, they want to tell a version of the truth.

01:01:24.520 They don't want to tell you the truth.

01:01:26.540 So, in theory,

01:01:28.360 everything should turn into a lie

01:01:31.200 because that's our economic model.

01:01:33.180 Anything provocative should turn into a lie

01:01:36.160 over time.

01:01:38.660 So, you'd assume that anything about women's rights,

01:01:41.820 men's rights,

01:01:42.900 black-white issues,

01:01:44.040 they all turn into lies

01:01:45.220 because that's the economic model.

01:01:48.720 It can't go any other way.

01:01:50.820 We don't seek truth

01:01:52.100 because truth doesn't pay.

01:01:54.180 We seek division

01:01:55.700 because division pays.

01:01:56.760 All right.

01:02:01.440 The religious?

01:02:03.120 I don't know.

01:02:03.620 I feel like it's a

01:02:04.520 seven-billion-way tie

01:02:06.820 that we're all lied to.

01:02:10.500 Sherman,

01:02:11.360 I've got an NPC.

01:02:13.640 You don't need to yell at me continuously.

01:02:16.220 Scott is believing the lies the most.

01:02:19.720 Sherman,

01:02:20.300 let's do a little test on you.

01:02:22.140 Give me an example of a lie I believe.

01:02:24.360 Go.

01:02:24.580 Let's see if you can produce

01:02:27.080 one fucking thing

01:02:28.680 to back that up.

01:02:29.920 Just one.

01:02:31.080 What's the lie I believe?

01:02:32.820 Go ahead.

01:02:33.300 Embarrass yourself.

01:02:34.900 You've got plenty of time.

01:02:36.400 Why?

01:02:36.640 I don't see any typing there.

01:02:38.720 Well, why don't you just go fuck yourself

01:02:40.500 and leave me alone?

01:02:44.960 Yeah.

01:02:45.240 Sherman, shut up there.

01:02:48.300 All right.

01:02:49.180 Go away, Sherman.

01:02:49.900 Now, Sherman's on YouTube.

01:02:56.880 Your mother is mortified?

01:03:01.540 Yeah, I use the NPCs for the warm-up.

01:03:04.240 All right.

01:03:05.580 I'm going to say goodbye to YouTube.

01:03:07.620 Sorry about all the swearing.

01:03:08.740 I got a little carried away with myself today.

01:03:10.880 I might control myself later,

01:03:12.300 but I doubt it.

01:03:14.220 Bye for now.

01:03:14.960 Bye for now.

01:03:26.500 Bye for now.

01:03:26.940 Bye.

01:03:27.540 Bye.

01:03:28.120 Bye.

01:03:28.660 Bye.

01:03:29.540 Bye.

01:03:29.620 Bye.

01:03:30.060 Bye.

01:03:30.280 Bye.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - May 06, 2023

Episode 2100 Scott Adams： Kamala The AI Czar, Trump Deposition, Tucker On Intel Control Of Congress

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript