Real Coffee with Scott Adams - May 08, 2023


Episode 2102 Scott Adams: Marine Hero, Migration Tsunami, Barr On Trump, Putin vs Oligarchs, RFK Jr.


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 2 minutes

Words per minute

141.95584

Word count

8,865

Sentence count

671

Harmful content

Misogyny

27

sentences flagged

Hate speech

22

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

On today's show, Scott Adams talks about the death of a man who died in a subway choke-hold, and whether or not it could have been an accident. Plus, how many inches tall is Matt Gaetz? And why does the Internet think he's 5'7"?

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.140 do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do good morning everybody and welcome to the
00:00:08.720 highlight of civilization where everything exciting and new and wonderful will happen
00:00:13.560 and it's going to happen any moment now and if you'd like to be part of the amazingness
00:00:19.480 that we call coffee with scott adams all you need to be part of this simultaneous sip is a
00:00:25.480 A cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or chalice or stein, a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:32.340 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.
00:00:35.500 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine here, the day, the thing that makes everything better.
00:00:41.340 It's called the Simultaneous Sip.
00:00:48.280 Ah.
00:00:51.740 So invigorating.
00:00:53.160 I feel alive. Alive.
00:00:57.880 Well, let's check the news.
00:01:00.240 I was just talking about this with the local subscribers before I went live on YouTube here.
00:01:06.000 And here's a funny little mystery that I want to see if you can solve.
00:01:12.240 Before I give you the answer, and on locals you already know the answer, but on YouTube,
00:01:18.200 tell me the height of Matt Gaetz.
00:01:22.780 Without Googling it, tell me the height of Matt Gaetz.
00:01:27.200 Go.
00:01:28.900 No, not 25%.
00:01:30.200 He's not 25% tall.
00:01:32.980 Give me his height.
00:01:33.900 I see 6'2", 6'1", oh, somebody Googled it.
00:01:42.440 Somebody Googled it.
00:01:44.120 All right, here's the answer.
00:01:46.900 Or actually, it's not the answer.
00:01:48.280 But what's interesting is if you Google it, he comes up as 5'7".
00:01:53.680 Is there any chance he's 5'7"?
00:01:57.320 There's none.
00:01:59.280 If you look at pictures of him standing next to Trump, they're about the same height.
00:02:04.080 Yeah, I don't know what he is, but he's not 5'7".
00:02:06.280 So how in the world does the entire Internet get the height of a prominent member of Congress wrong?
00:02:16.320 Where did that come from?
00:02:17.440 Was that kind of a prank?
00:02:20.360 I mean, somebody said they saw that and they were starting to doubt the Internet about my IQ.
00:02:27.300 Because, you know, my IQ is usually listed at 180.
00:02:29.880 And people are starting to say, well, wait a minute.
00:02:33.500 If Matt Gaetz is listed at 5'7", if that's not true, could it be also true that Scott's IQ is not 180?
00:02:44.000 And I think, no, anything's possible.
00:02:47.540 All right, well, I think it's funny that we have such an easily fact-checked thing that the Internet has wrong.
00:02:55.600 Pretty sure it's wrong.
00:02:57.600 Somebody's going to have to measure him and get back to me.
00:02:59.880 All right.
00:03:04.000 Let's talk about this, the situation about the Marine who put a chokehold on the gentleman who died in the subway.
00:03:15.380 Now, in my opinion, the Marine is a hero.
00:03:21.320 And I won't hear any arguments on the other side.
00:03:24.520 I'm just so done with this, everything's got to be a George Floyd.
00:03:30.520 No, everything isn't George Floyd.
00:03:33.000 Sometimes you're just reminded of it.
00:03:35.440 But this is very different.
00:03:37.880 The other thing that is a, let's say, a curiosity.
00:03:42.100 If there are any doctors here, there are usually some doctors watching the live stream.
00:03:47.540 If there are any doctors here, identify yourself when you answer this question, if you're willing.
00:03:51.640 If somebody dies from being choked, don't they usually die while they're being choked?
00:04:00.180 Because this individual was very much alive after the choking.
00:04:05.860 He didn't look in good shape, but he was very much alive and breathing.
00:04:09.940 Is there such a thing as dying from the choking, but like an hour later?
00:04:15.100 Is that something that can happen?
00:04:20.340 Brain damage?
00:04:24.700 Let's not talk about George Floyd.
00:04:30.300 But I guess I just don't know the answer to that question.
00:04:34.140 But I'll tell you what things are obvious.
00:04:37.640 What's obvious from the video is that nobody involved thought anything like a murder was happening.
00:04:45.100 Would you agree?
00:04:46.460 That there was nobody who was a witness who was aware of anything that looked like killing.
00:04:53.700 And when it was over, at least the part where they're holding down was over,
00:04:58.240 it still didn't look like anybody got killed because he was still alive.
00:05:02.540 So they were concerned about him.
00:05:04.220 So obviously their intention was not to kill him.
00:05:06.960 So there's no intention involved there.
00:05:08.740 So I feel like it's time to turn the corner on the bullshit.
00:05:16.640 We don't just have to assume the white guy's guilty and the black guy's innocent and he lived a wonderful life.
00:05:24.060 Sometimes the people who get killed, it's unfortunate,
00:05:28.720 but it's not because anybody did anything necessarily wrong.
00:05:32.540 So I'm not going to back down on this one.
00:05:38.080 I don't know about you, but I'm just not going to accept the narrative.
00:05:41.020 It's just not George Floyd.
00:05:42.440 Stop talking about him.
00:05:44.220 It has nothing to do with this.
00:05:45.980 This was somebody who probably looks like he had some mental problems.
00:05:50.900 But that was not anybody else's problem.
00:05:54.920 The people who were being threatened by him,
00:05:57.240 it wasn't their problem that he had a mental problem.
00:05:59.320 Well, their problem is that they were in danger or potential danger.
00:06:04.000 And they found a solution for it.
00:06:06.640 And nobody else got hurt.
00:06:09.120 So I would call that a horrible situation,
00:06:12.200 which unfortunately was pretty much prescribed by the elements that went into it.
00:06:19.080 It was sort of the only way it could have come up.
00:06:21.060 Apparently the way it happened is the only way it could have happened
00:06:23.940 given the variables that went into the situation.
00:06:26.080 So I'm not going to be outraged by that,
00:06:30.460 even though we can be...
00:06:32.040 You can have empathy for anybody who died, of course.
00:06:35.840 But I can't be outraged for any political reason about that.
00:06:41.040 All right.
00:06:44.660 Bill Barr had some words about Trump.
00:06:48.500 So as you know, Bill Barr was in the Trump administration.
00:06:51.400 So he got to see things from the inside.
00:06:54.620 But he thinks that even if you like Trump policies,
00:06:57.940 that Trump is uniquely unable to deliver them.
00:07:01.900 And that the only things that Trump accomplished
00:07:04.040 are things that probably any Republican could have done.
00:07:09.120 What do you think of that?
00:07:10.840 And that what Trump adds is chaos,
00:07:13.780 and he doesn't know how to manage toward getting something.
00:07:17.180 He's more like somebody who injects chaos,
00:07:20.480 and the only things that get done
00:07:21.640 are the things that any Republican could have gotten done.
00:07:26.060 What do you think?
00:07:28.460 Now, one example of that would be build the wall.
00:07:32.920 So build the wall is something
00:07:34.400 that not every standard Republican necessarily wanted,
00:07:38.800 but he couldn't get it done.
00:07:42.500 That's a good point.
00:07:44.760 Fentanyl didn't get it done.
00:07:47.180 Would you agree?
00:07:48.800 There was no real change in Fentanyl.
00:07:52.600 So I would say he did not,
00:07:54.760 although he did do a great job
00:07:56.340 of reducing immigration at the border.
00:08:00.100 But would a traditional Republican have done that?
00:08:05.040 I'm going to say no.
00:08:07.120 It feels like they wouldn't have.
00:08:09.400 It feels like that was uniquely Trump.
00:08:12.300 The other thing that's uniquely Trump
00:08:14.060 is the stuff that didn't happen.
00:08:16.540 It's hard to give somebody credit for things that didn't happen,
00:08:20.000 but how about he didn't start any new wars?
00:08:24.480 How about that?
00:08:25.400 And the only one he was involved with,
00:08:26.960 he wound down or won.
00:08:28.980 He won against ISIS,
00:08:31.980 and he wound down Afghanistan,
00:08:34.560 which wasn't a useful war.
00:08:37.040 So I don't agree with Bill Barr
00:08:39.780 that Trump has nothing unique to add.
00:08:43.280 He does have something unique to add.
00:08:44.760 And I think that he uniquely can get us out of the Ukraine situation.
00:08:48.360 I think he could uniquely do something useful with Taiwan.
00:08:54.000 And he makes me laugh every time he tells his strategy out loud,
00:08:59.280 when he brags about the fact that,
00:09:02.640 when he said that Moscow would be a risk if Putin took,
00:09:07.540 I don't know, whatever, Ukraine or something.
00:09:09.180 And he laughs about the fact,
00:09:12.460 or he jokes,
00:09:14.340 that if Putin only believed there was a 10% chance he was serious,
00:09:20.400 that was still enough to deter him.
00:09:22.880 But it's funny,
00:09:23.520 because Trump talks about it like it's not serious.
00:09:27.560 He just needs the other person to think he might be.
00:09:31.880 And that's enough.
00:09:33.220 And it might be.
00:09:34.020 That might be enough.
00:09:35.340 I don't know.
00:09:35.720 That's a hard claim to check.
00:09:39.740 But I would partially agree with Barr
00:09:43.420 in that Trump probably brings more chaos.
00:09:49.520 But I wonder if the situation would be the same
00:09:53.280 with the second presidency.
00:09:56.160 Do you think if Trump did a second round,
00:09:59.580 he would have weak advisors
00:10:01.740 because he'd have the same problem?
00:10:03.420 Nobody wants to work with him?
00:10:04.580 You know, the people with the most capability
00:10:07.040 don't want to get near the blast center?
00:10:12.380 So you think he'd be able to get higher quality advisors
00:10:15.820 and operatives than last time?
00:10:19.360 I think he would.
00:10:20.640 I think he just knows the landscape better.
00:10:23.180 So he'd know who to hire and who not to?
00:10:27.740 I don't know.
00:10:29.120 Could go either way.
00:10:29.960 So, titled 42 ends,
00:10:34.740 so that's the immigration thing that would,
00:10:38.800 I guess that was based on COVID
00:10:40.160 and it was at least keeping some of the immigration down.
00:10:45.100 But as soon as that ends,
00:10:45.920 we're expecting hundreds of thousands,
00:10:49.080 if not millions of people to stream over the border.
00:10:52.000 I saw a number of people refer to it as an invasion
00:10:54.300 because there are more immigrants coming over the border
00:10:58.360 in the next year or so, or the last year,
00:11:01.660 compared to the entire invasion of Ukraine.
00:11:05.980 You know, the Russian army didn't put as many people into Ukraine
00:11:08.760 during a massive invasion
00:11:11.220 as we're letting into the country over the border on a regular basis.
00:11:15.600 So would you call that an invasion?
00:11:18.140 Do you think that's a, is that a fair word?
00:11:20.480 That there's an invasion going on?
00:11:24.360 I'm going to say no on that.
00:11:25.920 I'm going to say no on invasion.
00:11:28.480 And here's the difference.
00:11:31.120 Russia invaded Ukraine to take it over.
00:11:36.800 An actual invasion.
00:11:38.740 The people who are coming across the border 1.00
00:11:40.360 are trying to join our team.
00:11:43.680 That's the opposite of an invasion.
00:11:45.600 They're literally joining our team.
00:11:50.100 In one generation,
00:11:52.100 their children will be fighting in our military.
00:11:55.660 That is our military.
00:11:58.060 You're watching our military come across the border.
00:12:00.720 It's one generation away,
00:12:02.420 but they will be our military.
00:12:05.320 You know, some number of them
00:12:06.320 will just be our police force,
00:12:08.700 our military.
00:12:11.240 So,
00:12:12.760 now, can we all be adults
00:12:15.520 enough to agree
00:12:16.580 that no generalization
00:12:18.500 applies to all the people?
00:12:20.020 Can we be adult enough?
00:12:22.340 Can we say that there must be
00:12:23.840 some criminals?
00:12:24.900 There has to be some MS-13 people.
00:12:27.800 There has to be.
00:12:29.020 Can we say that
00:12:30.080 they're all coming for different reasons?
00:12:31.860 That's not all one reason.
00:12:33.440 Can we say that
00:12:34.240 some number of them
00:12:34.940 will be some of the best citizens
00:12:36.420 we've ever had,
00:12:37.800 while some other number of them
00:12:39.140 will end up in jail
00:12:40.300 and hurt people?
00:12:41.440 We can say that, right?
00:12:43.200 It's a mix of people.
00:12:44.820 So there's going to be
00:12:45.560 some good, some bad,
00:12:46.800 but I don't like the invasion word.
00:12:49.700 I do like
00:12:51.060 a word that's got some danger built in,
00:12:54.340 because there is some danger.
00:12:55.900 I do like a word
00:12:57.140 that shows
00:12:58.600 it's a big deal,
00:12:59.980 because it's a really big deal,
00:13:02.480 and it's not all good,
00:13:04.380 that's for sure.
00:13:04.980 So, yeah,
00:13:07.360 I just don't see invasion
00:13:08.660 as our best word for this,
00:13:11.720 because it feels a little racist-y.
00:13:16.600 Even though I know
00:13:17.320 that's not really the central theme,
00:13:20.740 it does have that problem,
00:13:22.520 because it's a little too hyperbolic to me.
00:13:26.120 But I don't know of a better word.
00:13:28.360 Replacement.
00:13:29.460 No, I don't think it's replacement.
00:13:32.020 Yeah, incursion, invasion.
00:13:35.500 Yeah.
00:13:37.520 You know,
00:13:38.060 it's almost like
00:13:38.820 too much of a good thing.
00:13:41.540 You know,
00:13:42.280 if you wanted to argue,
00:13:43.200 if you wanted to argue
00:13:44.360 against Democrats,
00:13:46.200 who are willing to say
00:13:48.360 that immigration is a good thing,
00:13:50.440 and most of us would agree
00:13:51.500 at some level it's a good thing,
00:13:53.060 and at some kind of control
00:13:55.540 it's a good thing.
00:13:57.300 But I feel like maybe,
00:13:59.140 I'm just noodling here,
00:14:00.080 I'm just thinking out loud.
00:14:01.400 If you were going to argue
00:14:02.400 with somebody who is,
00:14:04.200 let's say,
00:14:04.840 more pro-open borders than you,
00:14:08.360 I would think
00:14:09.180 the strongest argument
00:14:10.200 would say this.
00:14:12.680 Immigration is good,
00:14:14.140 but too much of a good thing
00:14:15.460 is bad.
00:14:17.500 And we're at the
00:14:18.920 too much of a good thing,
00:14:21.060 bad stage.
00:14:23.700 That puts more of a positive spin on it.
00:14:26.800 It's like ice cream.
00:14:28.320 Ice cream's fine
00:14:29.200 if you just have it once in a while.
00:14:30.560 If you eat two tubs of it a night,
00:14:34.540 way too much.
00:14:35.780 It's too much.
00:14:37.700 So, I don't know.
00:14:38.640 I don't like the words
00:14:39.520 we're using on this,
00:14:40.460 because sometimes the words
00:14:41.740 end up driving your policy.
00:14:44.460 So if your word
00:14:45.240 is a little imprecise,
00:14:47.080 you might end up with a policy
00:14:48.580 that's a little imprecise.
00:14:50.120 And I feel like
00:14:50.840 we've got to get this right.
00:14:52.640 With my framing,
00:14:54.180 my framing is,
00:14:55.020 immigration's good,
00:14:55.880 but too much of a good thing
00:14:57.880 is bad, right?
00:14:59.140 You can die from
00:14:59.900 drinking too much water.
00:15:01.560 Did you know that?
00:15:03.220 Literally,
00:15:03.780 if you drink too much water,
00:15:05.580 you can die. 0.82
00:15:06.660 There's an economist
00:15:07.360 who just tell us
00:15:08.760 how many people to let in
00:15:09.900 and how many to die.
00:15:12.720 And then we follow that
00:15:14.160 until things change,
00:15:15.780 and then we adjust it.
00:15:17.320 So I'm amazed
00:15:18.340 that somebody like Vivek
00:15:20.000 hasn't suggested that.
00:15:23.120 Doesn't that mean like
00:15:23.920 an obvious thing
00:15:25.560 that somebody like him
00:15:26.480 would come up with?
00:15:28.960 Am I wrong?
00:15:30.640 Because it's the high ground,
00:15:32.920 the high ground play
00:15:34.460 is that none of us citizens
00:15:37.620 know the right number.
00:15:39.360 That's the high ground.
00:15:40.540 I don't know the right number.
00:15:42.340 I think there's some number
00:15:43.440 of immigration that's good,
00:15:45.220 and then beyond that,
00:15:46.200 it's bad.
00:15:46.980 But I don't know
00:15:47.540 what that number is.
00:15:48.360 I'd rather experts
00:15:49.660 kind of massage it
00:15:52.060 and play with it
00:15:52.760 and adjust it
00:15:53.580 and see if they can come up
00:15:56.200 with something over time.
00:15:57.600 On day one,
00:15:58.320 maybe it's a bad guess.
00:16:00.180 But maybe over time
00:16:01.220 we figure it out,
00:16:02.380 how to manage that doorway
00:16:04.900 a little better.
00:16:07.400 Anyway,
00:16:07.980 I think this whole
00:16:08.880 immigration thing
00:16:09.740 could be turned
00:16:10.280 into a positive
00:16:11.040 if we frame it as
00:16:13.420 immigration is good,
00:16:14.800 but too much of a good thing
00:16:16.180 could kill you. 0.53
00:16:17.200 So we need a group of people,
00:16:21.220 experts, economists,
00:16:22.260 to tell us how many employees
00:16:24.840 we need that we're short of.
00:16:28.000 Too far?
00:16:29.660 Somebody says too far.
00:16:32.160 Yeah, that's going to be
00:16:33.020 my rallying cry
00:16:34.060 for stuff that's too far.
00:16:36.540 It's just too far.
00:16:38.200 All right.
00:16:39.380 Let's talk about Putin.
00:16:40.880 So I saw an interesting,
00:16:43.560 let's say,
00:16:45.840 hypothesis,
00:16:46.840 might have been on
00:16:47.600 one of the news shows,
00:16:49.080 CNN maybe,
00:16:50.100 where there was somebody
00:16:51.420 suggesting that
00:16:52.600 the battle between
00:16:54.980 Purgosian
00:16:55.800 and the
00:16:56.880 Ministry of Defense,
00:16:58.660 where Purgosian
00:16:59.540 was saying
00:17:00.220 the Wagner Group
00:17:00.940 is going to
00:17:01.760 pull out,
00:17:02.500 we're going to pull out
00:17:03.300 if we don't get more ammo,
00:17:05.100 because the Ministry of Defense
00:17:06.260 is hogging it.
00:17:07.120 And apparently
00:17:08.660 he's changed his mind,
00:17:09.780 because he's promised
00:17:10.660 more ammo.
00:17:13.380 So who knows
00:17:14.380 if that's over.
00:17:15.520 But maybe,
00:17:16.240 so maybe it was nothing
00:17:17.280 but good negotiating.
00:17:19.960 And the Wagner guy
00:17:21.280 knew he was indispensable
00:17:22.560 at the moment,
00:17:23.760 so he could negotiate hard.
00:17:26.440 That's probably what
00:17:27.520 made him
00:17:28.300 an important person
00:17:29.880 over there,
00:17:30.380 is that he negotiates hard.
00:17:32.180 So maybe it was just that.
00:17:33.640 He was just negotiating
00:17:34.480 to get more ammo.
00:17:35.200 But others are suggesting
00:17:38.100 that Putin
00:17:40.360 is letting his
00:17:41.920 oligarchs and generals
00:17:43.640 fight it out,
00:17:45.300 so that he becomes
00:17:46.600 sort of away from the fray.
00:17:48.900 So he'll let the,
00:17:49.860 you know,
00:17:50.460 the underlings
00:17:51.720 battle it out
00:17:53.320 a little bit in public,
00:17:54.880 and just sees
00:17:56.740 where it ends up.
00:17:58.120 That doesn't feel right to me.
00:18:00.720 Does that sound like
00:18:01.780 a real thing
00:18:02.500 that Putin would be doing?
00:18:04.000 We can't read his mind.
00:18:05.200 Right?
00:18:05.920 Can't read his mind.
00:18:06.940 But it doesn't feel
00:18:08.220 like something he would do.
00:18:10.180 Because he has the power
00:18:11.380 to tell them to shut up.
00:18:13.820 If you have the power
00:18:14.920 to tell people to shut up,
00:18:17.220 and if they don't shut up, 0.67
00:18:18.900 it makes your country
00:18:19.680 look like it's in conflict,
00:18:21.520 I don't understand
00:18:23.280 letting them do it.
00:18:25.640 It only makes sense
00:18:26.860 if he couldn't stop them.
00:18:29.580 Would you agree?
00:18:31.360 It makes far more sense
00:18:32.860 that they're doing it
00:18:33.680 despite Putin
00:18:34.700 not liking it.
00:18:36.400 Like,
00:18:36.720 there's something
00:18:37.200 deeper than that.
00:18:38.380 I'm not buying the
00:18:39.480 Putin likes his people 0.91
00:18:40.900 to fight in public.
00:18:42.220 That doesn't feel real.
00:18:44.580 But I'll put it out there.
00:18:46.180 Somebody said it.
00:18:47.640 All right.
00:18:49.180 Then there's another oligarch
00:18:50.700 who made some news
00:18:51.760 very directly
00:18:53.120 criticizing the war.
00:18:54.980 Right?
00:18:55.120 He wasn't pulling any punches.
00:18:58.040 Just bad war,
00:18:59.120 bad decision.
00:19:00.620 You know,
00:19:00.800 we shouldn't be there.
00:19:02.280 So,
00:19:03.500 is that oligarch
00:19:04.960 going to disappear?
00:19:06.520 Or is there,
00:19:07.320 like,
00:19:07.620 a beginning of a crack
00:19:09.060 in the unity?
00:19:12.020 I think it's too soon.
00:19:14.600 Too soon to know
00:19:15.800 if there's any kind
00:19:16.480 of an oligarch
00:19:17.980 trend happening.
00:19:19.440 But one thing
00:19:20.340 that does seem clear
00:19:21.240 is that the oligarchs
00:19:22.720 are seeing it's not
00:19:23.420 working in their favor.
00:19:25.120 I don't believe
00:19:26.160 there are too many oligarchs
00:19:27.360 who are saying,
00:19:28.420 ooh,
00:19:28.740 I can't wait
00:19:29.260 until we capture
00:19:30.040 those regions
00:19:32.220 within Ukraine
00:19:33.500 because I'm going
00:19:34.680 to make some money then.
00:19:36.120 I think the oligarchs
00:19:37.460 see it as all bad.
00:19:39.120 Meaning they already
00:19:40.120 have a good situation.
00:19:41.560 They're oligarchs.
00:19:43.020 The only thing
00:19:43.680 they need to continue
00:19:44.560 being happy
00:19:45.160 is for Russia's economy
00:19:47.220 and standing in the world
00:19:48.540 to not degrade
00:19:50.560 because they'd like
00:19:51.600 to travel.
00:19:52.800 Imagine being this,
00:19:53.740 like,
00:19:54.180 richest guy in the world
00:19:55.100 one of the oligarchs.
00:19:58.080 You're a Russian 1.00
00:19:58.800 with just billions
00:19:59.600 and billions of dollars.
00:20:00.780 The world is your
00:20:01.680 playground.
00:20:03.760 And then you're not
00:20:04.720 allowed to leave Russia.
00:20:07.520 That would really suck
00:20:08.980 for an oligarch.
00:20:10.580 They've got their
00:20:11.040 private planes,
00:20:12.060 they want to go places.
00:20:13.640 Get out of Russia. 0.97
00:20:15.180 So,
00:20:15.940 I think there might be
00:20:17.880 more oligarch pressure
00:20:19.520 on Putin than we can see
00:20:22.860 from the outside.
00:20:24.320 I would think the oligarchs
00:20:25.680 would be solidly
00:20:27.140 against the war
00:20:28.020 by now.
00:20:29.220 What do you think?
00:20:31.140 Of course,
00:20:31.900 there'll be exceptions.
00:20:33.000 But wouldn't you say
00:20:33.700 that mostly the oligarchs 0.75
00:20:35.120 would be against the war
00:20:36.380 at this point
00:20:36.960 and would rather
00:20:37.540 just wind it down
00:20:38.440 no matter what happens?
00:20:40.600 These special operations,
00:20:41.980 I should say,
00:20:42.520 not a war.
00:20:43.180 Not if they're profiting.
00:20:47.980 Well,
00:20:48.280 I suspect most of the oligarchs
00:20:50.260 are losing money
00:20:51.000 and not profiting.
00:20:52.280 Because the oligarchs
00:20:53.380 are being named by name.
00:20:55.440 Right?
00:20:55.860 And some of their assets
00:20:56.760 are being frozen
00:20:57.520 and they can't get chips
00:20:59.400 to make stuff.
00:21:01.620 I don't know.
00:21:02.940 So I think maybe
00:21:03.720 that's the game
00:21:05.060 within the game
00:21:05.720 is the oligarchs
00:21:06.640 trying to work Putin
00:21:08.860 to end it.
00:21:11.880 Well,
00:21:12.360 Washington Post
00:21:13.920 is blaming
00:21:16.900 I don't know
00:21:19.480 what's true here.
00:21:21.260 So I've told you
00:21:22.220 before that
00:21:22.900 I'm going to
00:21:23.620 intentionally ignore
00:21:25.020 the mass shootings.
00:21:27.840 And I ignore them
00:21:28.920 so hard
00:21:29.340 I can't even tell
00:21:30.040 which one we're
00:21:30.600 talking about anymore.
00:21:32.220 I'll look at the news
00:21:33.220 and it'll be
00:21:33.600 blah, blah,
00:21:34.320 mass shooting.
00:21:35.600 And I can't tell
00:21:36.580 if it's a new one
00:21:37.720 or the one
00:21:38.660 that just happened
00:21:39.400 or it's the one
00:21:40.280 before the one before.
00:21:42.360 I don't know.
00:21:42.680 I just know
00:21:43.060 there's lots of
00:21:43.580 mass shootings.
00:21:45.700 And there will be
00:21:46.520 a lot more.
00:21:48.320 I think I've told you
00:21:49.520 this before.
00:21:50.720 Every signal
00:21:51.700 in society
00:21:52.620 is sending the message
00:21:54.040 oh, there's going to be
00:21:55.200 a lot more mass shootings.
00:21:56.980 A lot more.
00:21:58.380 Because the
00:21:59.040 things that cause it
00:22:00.700 are young men
00:22:01.760 who don't have
00:22:02.520 a better direction.
00:22:04.900 And we have
00:22:05.580 the highest number
00:22:06.440 of young men
00:22:07.140 without a good direction
00:22:08.200 of all time.
00:22:08.860 Then you've got
00:22:09.980 your mental illness 0.70
00:22:10.840 seems to be
00:22:11.680 at an all time high.
00:22:13.080 You've got your
00:22:13.640 drug use
00:22:14.360 seems to be
00:22:15.140 at an all time high.
00:22:16.660 And then you've got
00:22:17.520 your media
00:22:18.600 getting people
00:22:19.260 all worked up.
00:22:21.020 Social media too
00:22:22.040 seems to be
00:22:22.840 at an all time high.
00:22:24.400 And we have
00:22:25.340 fewer
00:22:26.420 positive paths
00:22:28.760 for young men.
00:22:30.620 So the young men
00:22:31.560 are not going out there
00:22:32.420 and just slaying it
00:22:33.420 with the young women
00:22:34.180 and starting families.
00:22:35.280 They just don't feel
00:22:35.980 they have options.
00:22:36.640 So if you have
00:22:38.440 that many young men
00:22:39.620 without direction
00:22:40.460 and you have
00:22:41.820 a country full
00:22:42.600 of easy access
00:22:43.460 to guns
00:22:44.060 there's only one
00:22:45.520 way this goes.
00:22:47.340 There's going to be
00:22:48.120 a whole lot more
00:22:49.160 mass shootings
00:22:50.020 and there's nothing
00:22:50.780 that you can do
00:22:51.320 about it.
00:22:53.100 I mean you can do
00:22:54.080 a good guy with a gun
00:22:55.340 you can do a little
00:22:56.100 stuff around the edges
00:22:57.020 but we have a
00:22:58.480 social situation
00:22:59.800 that guarantees it.
00:23:01.720 As long as the
00:23:02.800 basic social situation
00:23:04.180 exists
00:23:04.740 there's just
00:23:06.680 going to be
00:23:06.960 more of it.
00:23:08.100 I would just
00:23:08.720 stay away from
00:23:09.260 crowds
00:23:09.720 frankly.
00:23:11.460 That's my strategy.
00:23:14.560 Alright.
00:23:18.900 So let's get
00:23:19.940 here's an update
00:23:20.560 on Bud Light.
00:23:21.740 I've been fascinated
00:23:22.700 as much by how
00:23:23.820 the Anheuser-Busch
00:23:25.280 handles the crisis.
00:23:28.220 So we still don't know
00:23:29.440 if there's any
00:23:29.980 permanent damage
00:23:31.740 because the Bud Light
00:23:32.960 pushback to the
00:23:34.520 Dylan Mulvaney
00:23:35.300 as an influencer
00:23:36.820 situation.
00:23:38.300 And so the only
00:23:40.020 thing that was
00:23:40.820 affected was
00:23:41.660 one brand.
00:23:43.820 So Anheuser-Busch
00:23:44.640 actually had a
00:23:45.300 pretty good quarter
00:23:46.080 if you don't count
00:23:47.540 that Bud Light
00:23:48.200 went down 25%
00:23:49.380 because of this.
00:23:50.660 Now they don't know
00:23:51.380 if it'll stay down
00:23:52.120 25%.
00:23:53.140 I have a feeling
00:23:54.780 it will.
00:23:56.120 This one has a
00:23:57.760 feeling like it's
00:24:00.000 going to last
00:24:00.680 because everybody
00:24:01.800 heard of it
00:24:02.400 and everybody
00:24:03.400 has the same
00:24:03.920 feeling later.
00:24:06.240 So people will
00:24:07.100 develop a new
00:24:07.700 habit and the
00:24:08.660 new habit
00:24:09.100 probably has
00:24:09.880 now excluded
00:24:11.040 Bud Light.
00:24:12.300 So that's a big
00:24:13.300 deal.
00:24:14.240 So what they did
00:24:14.860 was Anheuser-Busch
00:24:16.460 first of all
00:24:17.180 they reassigned
00:24:18.140 or got rid of
00:24:18.780 two executives
00:24:19.520 and that didn't
00:24:21.460 seem to be enough.
00:24:23.160 So now they're
00:24:23.840 blaming their
00:24:24.520 ad agency
00:24:25.820 but they're not
00:24:26.820 naming the ad
00:24:27.500 agency.
00:24:29.200 How would you
00:24:29.940 like to be the
00:24:30.740 ad agency
00:24:31.480 that recommended
00:24:32.860 that?
00:24:35.540 How would you
00:24:36.300 like to be the
00:24:36.900 one that
00:24:37.220 recommended?
00:24:37.740 How do you
00:24:38.260 ever get another
00:24:39.000 job?
00:24:40.540 Well what kind
00:24:41.420 of work did you
00:24:42.100 do before?
00:24:43.340 Well we were
00:24:45.440 behind the Bud
00:24:46.740 Light promotion.
00:24:49.560 It's a little
00:24:50.220 tough to market
00:24:50.860 yourself after
00:24:51.520 that.
00:24:52.940 But Anheuser-Busch
00:24:54.360 quite wisely is
00:24:55.700 trying to throw
00:24:56.520 the ad agency
00:24:57.260 under the bus
00:24:58.020 despite the fact
00:24:59.860 that anything
00:25:00.940 the ad agency
00:25:01.800 suggested was
00:25:03.640 approved by
00:25:04.840 an Anheuser-Busch
00:25:08.040 executive.
00:25:09.700 I'm not sure
00:25:10.860 that blaming
00:25:11.480 the ad agency
00:25:12.500 is on point
00:25:15.020 because ad
00:25:16.260 agencies are
00:25:17.000 supposed to give
00:25:17.500 you a few
00:25:17.940 different looks
00:25:18.680 right?
00:25:19.700 They don't give
00:25:20.300 you one idea
00:25:21.240 do they?
00:25:23.220 Don't they give
00:25:23.780 you a whole variety
00:25:24.600 of ideas and then
00:25:25.500 you as the
00:25:25.980 executive pick the
00:25:26.900 good one?
00:25:28.060 So I feel it's
00:25:29.200 a little bit
00:25:30.860 unfair to blame
00:25:32.620 the ad agency.
00:25:33.840 A little bit
00:25:34.420 unfair.
00:25:36.580 But I'd have to
00:25:37.480 know how hard
00:25:38.040 they pushed.
00:25:39.580 If they really
00:25:40.480 pushed this
00:25:41.360 you know the
00:25:42.220 Dylan Mulvaney
00:25:42.920 thing and
00:25:44.020 then you know
00:25:45.540 Anheuser-Busch
00:25:46.240 executive agreed
00:25:48.360 to it that's
00:25:49.900 still two people
00:25:50.660 making a mistake
00:25:51.460 but you can see
00:25:52.660 why the ad agency
00:25:53.480 would be a little
00:25:54.740 more guilty if
00:25:55.980 they pushed it
00:25:56.580 hard.
00:25:57.360 But we don't
00:25:57.760 know that.
00:25:58.700 We don't know
00:25:59.120 if they pushed
00:25:59.560 it hard or
00:26:00.100 it's just one
00:26:00.540 of the things
00:26:00.940 they suggested
00:26:01.560 in a list of
00:26:02.740 lots of things.
00:26:06.480 Alright.
00:26:10.940 Here's an
00:26:11.460 interesting story
00:26:12.480 that I wasn't
00:26:13.020 aware of.
00:26:13.920 Are you all
00:26:14.420 aware of RFK
00:26:15.500 Jr.'s past
00:26:17.640 wildlife which
00:26:19.440 apparently includes
00:26:20.420 lots of
00:26:20.900 womanizing while 1.00
00:26:22.820 previously married
00:26:23.880 and a whole
00:26:25.340 bunch of
00:26:25.660 drugs.
00:26:27.900 So at one
00:26:28.600 point he did
00:26:29.120 heroin
00:26:29.500 and you know
00:26:31.860 psychedelics and
00:26:33.840 marijuana
00:26:34.400 probably assumed
00:26:35.920 drinking.
00:26:37.540 And the story
00:26:38.740 is that he is
00:26:39.520 now off of
00:26:41.100 everything right.
00:26:42.980 So at the
00:26:43.900 moment I would
00:26:44.520 assume he's not
00:26:45.120 drinking either
00:26:45.820 because if you're
00:26:46.340 an addict you
00:26:46.880 can't drink.
00:26:49.660 Allegedly.
00:26:50.140 Now I have
00:26:52.600 mixed feelings
00:26:53.320 about this.
00:26:54.400 I have mixed
00:26:54.700 feelings.
00:26:55.520 As you know
00:26:56.200 my single issue
00:26:58.220 this time is
00:26:58.920 going to be
00:26:59.220 fentanyl and
00:27:00.700 I'm not sure
00:27:01.400 that that's bad
00:27:02.460 to have an
00:27:03.800 ex-addict who
00:27:05.780 would be in
00:27:06.240 charge of the
00:27:06.920 policies about
00:27:08.580 fentanyl.
00:27:09.820 Is that good
00:27:10.500 or bad?
00:27:12.180 See I trust
00:27:13.560 that he won't
00:27:14.360 be abusing
00:27:15.860 substances if he
00:27:17.060 were president
00:27:17.580 because the
00:27:18.700 president gets
00:27:19.240 watched pretty
00:27:19.820 closely.
00:27:20.460 So I would
00:27:21.540 guess that you
00:27:22.800 know you could
00:27:23.200 expect him to
00:27:24.260 be clean in
00:27:24.920 office.
00:27:29.900 But would you
00:27:32.240 rather have
00:27:32.740 somebody who
00:27:33.260 really understands
00:27:34.420 addiction working
00:27:36.180 on addiction or
00:27:37.460 somebody who's
00:27:38.000 never had a
00:27:38.540 drink?
00:27:40.840 I feel like
00:27:42.020 his experience
00:27:44.160 might have an
00:27:44.900 advantage.
00:27:46.540 Because the
00:27:47.760 part that we
00:27:48.320 always overlook
00:27:49.340 look, I like
00:27:51.000 to say we
00:27:51.720 should go hard
00:27:52.240 against the
00:27:52.720 cartels.
00:27:53.860 But I also
00:27:55.980 know it's not
00:27:56.520 enough.
00:27:57.980 You could take
00:27:58.640 out the cartels
00:27:59.440 tomorrow and
00:28:00.060 it would be
00:28:00.300 replaced with
00:28:00.900 some other
00:28:01.300 criminal element.
00:28:02.700 So people are
00:28:03.440 still going to
00:28:03.860 get their
00:28:04.140 fentanyl.
00:28:06.120 Which is not a
00:28:07.060 reason to not
00:28:08.360 attack the
00:28:08.900 cartels because
00:28:10.120 they are sending
00:28:10.680 death into our
00:28:11.380 country.
00:28:11.780 So you do
00:28:12.740 need to take
00:28:13.860 care of business.
00:28:15.460 But maybe you
00:28:16.900 need somebody who
00:28:17.620 has been there
00:28:18.300 and felt it and
00:28:19.720 knows how strong
00:28:21.060 it is to suggest
00:28:22.940 a workaround.
00:28:23.940 Now my workaround
00:28:24.840 is the only one
00:28:25.880 that I think can
00:28:26.480 work, which is to
00:28:27.920 build cities from
00:28:29.800 scratch that just
00:28:31.520 don't have any
00:28:32.300 access in or out
00:28:33.440 for any drugs.
00:28:35.440 Now it might still
00:28:36.340 get shipped in,
00:28:37.160 but as soon as
00:28:37.680 somebody within that
00:28:38.500 city tests positive
00:28:40.700 for drugs, you move
00:28:41.620 them out of the
00:28:42.160 city.
00:28:42.400 You have to
00:28:44.240 expel them from 1.00
00:28:44.960 the city the
00:28:45.580 moment there's a
00:28:46.280 drug there.
00:28:47.500 There could be
00:28:47.860 no, you know,
00:28:49.260 that can't be
00:28:49.740 negotiable.
00:28:50.880 But yeah, you
00:28:51.360 need some kind of
00:28:51.960 a gated city where
00:28:53.080 you can just put
00:28:53.680 all of the people
00:28:54.460 who have the same
00:28:54.940 problem, but that
00:28:56.380 they can live a
00:28:57.320 quality life while
00:28:59.720 they're there, and
00:29:01.040 then anytime they
00:29:01.740 want to leave, or
00:29:03.580 let's say, you
00:29:04.320 know, maybe there's
00:29:05.220 a period where they
00:29:05.900 have to be there
00:29:06.540 for a month or
00:29:07.120 something, depending
00:29:08.120 if there was a
00:29:08.780 crime involved.
00:29:09.520 But they should
00:29:12.300 have a way out,
00:29:13.740 right?
00:29:14.060 They should be
00:29:14.560 able to get dry
00:29:15.280 for X amount of
00:29:16.440 weeks, and that
00:29:17.760 should be enough
00:29:18.260 for them to get
00:29:18.760 out if they want
00:29:19.400 to.
00:29:20.220 So I wouldn't
00:29:20.900 call it a prison
00:29:21.580 city, because you
00:29:22.600 could build the
00:29:24.060 city at a higher
00:29:25.800 lifestyle than
00:29:26.560 they're experiencing
00:29:27.520 right now.
00:29:29.120 You know, it could
00:29:29.620 be a good lifestyle
00:29:30.480 if you build it
00:29:31.040 from scratch.
00:29:33.340 Yeah, let's call
00:29:34.080 it a recovery
00:29:34.640 city.
00:29:36.520 I like that,
00:29:37.380 recovery city.
00:29:38.180 That's not bad.
00:29:42.080 Yeah, it wouldn't
00:29:42.780 be a gulag, because
00:29:43.880 it would be only
00:29:45.600 mandatory for a
00:29:47.160 small number of
00:29:47.820 people who had
00:29:49.220 perhaps, you
00:29:50.880 know, violated an
00:29:51.800 actual crime.
00:29:54.480 Detoxity.
00:29:55.460 Oh, that's not
00:29:56.000 bad.
00:29:57.220 Detoxity.
00:29:59.180 Ah, I like it.
00:30:02.420 Rehabopolis.
00:30:06.460 New Oakland.
00:30:07.300 New Oakland.
00:30:09.460 That's funny.
00:30:11.100 All right, well,
00:30:11.580 Matt Walsh is trying
00:30:13.100 to get into extra
00:30:13.980 trouble, because I
00:30:15.240 guess he didn't get
00:30:15.860 into enough trouble
00:30:16.820 with his opinions on
00:30:18.280 the trans community.
00:30:20.240 So now he's got an
00:30:21.680 opinion piece about
00:30:22.780 why there's one word
00:30:25.460 that people are not
00:30:28.380 allowed to use,
00:30:29.620 unless they're black,
00:30:30.900 which would be the
00:30:31.620 N-word.
00:30:32.000 word, and he
00:30:33.420 argues, you know,
00:30:36.120 why is it that it's
00:30:37.260 insane that there's
00:30:38.020 one word that you
00:30:38.780 can't use in any
00:30:39.640 context?
00:30:40.520 Now, he's not
00:30:41.120 arguing, he's not
00:30:42.800 arguing using the
00:30:44.500 word in casual
00:30:45.320 conversation.
00:30:46.520 He's just saying that
00:30:47.540 is there no situation
00:30:49.480 where you could talk
00:30:50.380 about the word?
00:30:52.660 You can't even say
00:30:53.860 somebody used this
00:30:55.180 word.
00:30:55.940 You have to say N-word,
00:30:57.120 and as he points
00:30:58.100 out, N-word means
00:30:59.520 exactly the same.
00:31:01.640 So it's weird, and
00:31:02.380 you think the other
00:31:03.140 word as soon as you
00:31:03.820 hear N-word.
00:31:04.680 So it's just sort of
00:31:06.040 a crazy, insane
00:31:07.300 situation.
00:31:09.120 Here's my opinion.
00:31:11.720 It's just one word.
00:31:14.180 It's just one word.
00:31:16.520 I don't know that
00:31:17.500 that's like the
00:31:18.600 beginning of some
00:31:19.320 slippery slope,
00:31:20.900 because, you know,
00:31:22.140 it's been decades
00:31:23.280 when that word was,
00:31:24.760 you know, not right
00:31:26.180 for polite company,
00:31:27.600 but I don't think
00:31:28.920 things were slipping
00:31:29.720 because of that
00:31:30.480 one word, right?
00:31:32.980 I also say that
00:31:34.280 there are some
00:31:35.760 things which you
00:31:36.500 should not
00:31:37.040 analogize to.
00:31:40.500 For example,
00:31:41.560 the Holocaust. 0.58
00:31:43.140 It wasn't anything
00:31:43.940 quite like it,
00:31:45.320 or slavery in
00:31:46.340 America.
00:31:47.380 Nothing really
00:31:48.100 was like that,
00:31:49.760 or whatever
00:31:52.240 the settlers did
00:31:53.880 to the Native
00:31:54.580 Americans.
00:31:56.180 It wasn't anything
00:31:56.900 exactly like that,
00:31:58.380 so it's hard to
00:31:59.100 compare anything to
00:31:59.760 it.
00:32:00.160 So this word is
00:32:01.240 the same.
00:32:02.500 There's nothing
00:32:03.160 like that word,
00:32:04.680 because there's
00:32:05.140 nothing like
00:32:05.760 American slavery,
00:32:06.920 at least in the
00:32:07.500 American experience.
00:32:09.820 So I don't mind
00:32:11.300 if somebody has a
00:32:12.260 word that is
00:32:13.940 out of bounds.
00:32:15.100 Just one word.
00:32:17.020 No big deal to me.
00:32:18.300 I do think that
00:32:22.540 you shouldn't go to
00:32:23.220 jail and get
00:32:23.760 canceled if you
00:32:24.660 use it in the
00:32:25.400 context of talking
00:32:26.340 about it.
00:32:29.200 Now, as
00:32:30.780 somebody would
00:32:31.220 say, white
00:32:33.200 people can be
00:32:33.860 called crackers,
00:32:35.340 and usually we
00:32:36.160 just laugh at it.
00:32:37.520 I do.
00:32:38.320 I laugh every time
00:32:39.320 I hear somebody
00:32:39.800 call me a
00:32:40.280 cracker.
00:32:41.280 I don't know if
00:32:41.840 it's because the
00:32:42.540 word is funny.
00:32:43.460 Now, I would
00:32:47.020 argue that the
00:32:48.260 people who are
00:32:48.780 not bothered by
00:32:49.580 words have an
00:32:50.500 advantage over
00:32:51.680 people who are.
00:32:53.940 If you were to
00:32:55.160 check back in a
00:32:56.080 few years, the
00:32:56.740 people who are
00:32:57.220 not bothered by
00:32:58.000 words probably do
00:32:58.840 better than the
00:33:00.200 people who are
00:33:00.720 out of bounds
00:33:01.180 in words, because
00:33:02.140 that would be the
00:33:02.620 least important
00:33:03.160 thing you could
00:33:03.620 do.
00:33:04.920 But, hey, I
00:33:06.760 also like people
00:33:07.380 to feel comfortable.
00:33:09.440 And, you know,
00:33:10.100 there's a reason I
00:33:11.380 don't use the C
00:33:12.180 word.
00:33:13.460 In mixed
00:33:14.900 company where I
00:33:15.620 don't know
00:33:15.940 everybody, I
00:33:18.160 would definitely
00:33:18.560 use it privately.
00:33:19.640 But I wouldn't
00:33:20.320 use it in mixed
00:33:21.700 company if I
00:33:22.400 didn't know the
00:33:22.920 crowd, right?
00:33:24.520 So it's not a
00:33:25.440 big deal to, you
00:33:27.200 know, censor
00:33:27.780 yourself if
00:33:29.600 something is,
00:33:31.100 somebody says
00:33:31.860 cracker is a
00:33:32.620 horrible insult.
00:33:34.200 How many of you
00:33:34.960 are white people
00:33:36.120 who would be
00:33:36.540 insulted by the
00:33:37.420 word cracker?
00:33:41.360 Anybody?
00:33:43.460 To me, it's one
00:33:44.880 of the funniest
00:33:45.360 words.
00:33:46.880 It just sounds
00:33:47.680 funny.
00:33:48.620 Cracker.
00:33:51.440 No, none of
00:33:52.280 you are offended,
00:33:53.220 right?
00:33:54.320 I don't think so.
00:33:56.900 Anyway, I'm
00:33:58.540 going to say that
00:33:59.240 I completely see
00:34:00.680 Matt Walsh's
00:34:01.440 point, but I
00:34:03.040 don't think it's
00:34:03.520 important.
00:34:05.220 It's just the
00:34:05.980 least important
00:34:06.560 thing to talk
00:34:07.140 about.
00:34:07.360 I wouldn't
00:34:09.380 personally use
00:34:09.980 the word because
00:34:10.900 I find it, to
00:34:12.740 me, it's one of
00:34:13.280 the very few
00:34:13.920 words where you
00:34:16.400 can actually, it
00:34:17.360 makes your body
00:34:18.040 feel bad.
00:34:18.780 I talked about
00:34:19.360 writing humor.
00:34:20.820 When you write
00:34:21.340 humor, you use
00:34:22.180 your body to
00:34:23.840 judge whether
00:34:24.460 something worked.
00:34:26.000 Like if you
00:34:26.560 laugh, oh, your
00:34:27.440 body did that.
00:34:28.580 You didn't decide
00:34:29.320 to laugh, you
00:34:29.880 just laughed.
00:34:30.740 Your body
00:34:31.220 actually reacted.
00:34:32.380 So that's how I
00:34:33.060 judge my writing,
00:34:34.280 is by my body.
00:34:35.380 But that word,
00:34:36.700 the n-word, even
00:34:39.880 the thought of
00:34:41.000 the word, gives
00:34:42.900 me a bad body
00:34:43.840 feel.
00:34:44.980 Does anybody
00:34:45.420 else get that?
00:34:46.800 It might be a
00:34:47.400 writer thing.
00:34:48.380 Because the word
00:34:49.080 itself has an
00:34:50.180 ugliness to it
00:34:51.260 that does
00:34:52.500 transcend almost
00:34:55.380 any word I can
00:34:56.080 think of.
00:34:58.560 The other word
00:34:59.800 that has that
00:35:00.460 quality to it is
00:35:01.700 rape.
00:35:04.020 I don't like to
00:35:05.060 use the r-word
00:35:05.880 because there's
00:35:08.300 a physical
00:35:08.860 feeling to it
00:35:09.660 that's just
00:35:10.320 really negative.
00:35:11.880 Like you can
00:35:12.620 just feel the
00:35:13.300 weight of the
00:35:13.780 word.
00:35:14.800 So the n-word
00:35:15.400 does that to
00:35:15.960 me.
00:35:16.120 There's like a
00:35:16.740 disgust, just
00:35:18.460 like a natural
00:35:19.180 physical disgust
00:35:20.740 when I even
00:35:21.560 think of it.
00:35:22.780 Now, I don't
00:35:23.340 get that disgust
00:35:24.600 when black people
00:35:25.880 are using it,
00:35:26.540 right?
00:35:27.080 But I think of
00:35:27.960 it just as a
00:35:28.640 word.
00:35:29.120 It's just like
00:35:29.620 an ugly word.
00:35:32.020 And there are
00:35:32.580 other ones like
00:35:33.120 that.
00:35:36.260 Paul Graham.
00:35:40.340 So Paul
00:35:41.040 Graham, famous
00:35:42.060 investor type,
00:35:43.520 very good
00:35:44.100 follow, says
00:35:44.960 lots of wise
00:35:45.560 things.
00:35:46.540 I would put
00:35:47.240 him in the
00:35:47.760 internet dad
00:35:48.540 category of
00:35:50.000 people who
00:35:50.400 are just
00:35:50.720 trying to
00:35:52.040 make sure
00:35:52.400 that we
00:35:52.680 don't get
00:35:53.020 too crazy.
00:35:55.660 And he
00:35:56.540 tweeted this
00:35:57.320 provocatively.
00:35:58.920 he said that
00:36:00.580 men commit
00:36:01.160 95% of
00:36:02.140 homicides.
00:36:03.060 I don't
00:36:03.800 consider it a
00:36:04.480 slander if
00:36:05.180 someone says
00:36:05.720 men are
00:36:06.280 inherently more
00:36:07.120 violent.
00:36:08.020 It seems
00:36:08.480 obviously true.
00:36:10.060 Now, when I
00:36:10.780 read that, I
00:36:11.320 said to myself
00:36:11.980 two things.
00:36:13.060 Number one,
00:36:13.760 okay, that is
00:36:15.120 100% obviously
00:36:16.500 true, that men
00:36:17.840 are doing most
00:36:18.880 of the homicides,
00:36:20.140 and that everybody
00:36:21.320 can see it, and
00:36:22.700 it shouldn't be
00:36:23.460 like a big
00:36:25.020 problem if you
00:36:25.900 point it out.
00:36:26.440 Well, what do
00:36:28.380 you think people
00:36:28.920 said?
00:36:30.200 They had a big
00:36:30.880 problem with it.
00:36:33.120 I can't think of
00:36:34.140 anything that
00:36:34.780 would be more
00:36:35.400 obvious and
00:36:38.400 true, that men
00:36:39.940 are the ones
00:36:40.400 creating most of
00:36:41.240 the murders.
00:36:43.000 And yet, there
00:36:43.940 was pushback.
00:36:45.460 There was
00:36:45.800 pushback.
00:36:47.320 Now, here's
00:36:49.880 what you're
00:36:50.260 wondering.
00:36:52.220 Is this the
00:36:53.160 first sort of
00:36:55.080 the platform
00:36:55.840 tweet that's
00:36:58.340 making you ask
00:36:59.200 the question
00:36:59.800 about crime
00:37:02.560 differences by
00:37:03.360 ethnicity?
00:37:05.100 Now, if he
00:37:05.860 can say that
00:37:06.560 men are
00:37:07.080 obviously more
00:37:08.740 murderous than
00:37:09.480 women, how 1.00
00:37:12.200 close is that
00:37:12.940 to saying,
00:37:13.480 well, and
00:37:14.040 there's this
00:37:14.540 ethnic group
00:37:15.260 that seems to
00:37:16.440 have a high
00:37:16.860 murder rate,
00:37:17.540 too?
00:37:19.360 Are we going
00:37:20.040 to say that
00:37:20.440 that's now
00:37:21.640 obvious and
00:37:22.380 everybody can
00:37:22.880 see it and
00:37:23.420 there's nothing
00:37:23.820 to talk about
00:37:24.520 here?
00:37:24.760 because it
00:37:25.620 doesn't work
00:37:26.140 that way.
00:37:28.240 He's in
00:37:28.880 dangerous
00:37:29.320 territory by
00:37:30.760 pointing out
00:37:31.260 the obvious,
00:37:32.540 which is men
00:37:33.420 kill more
00:37:33.900 people than
00:37:34.360 women. 0.81
00:37:35.520 But I feel
00:37:36.680 as though the
00:37:37.120 danger here is
00:37:38.440 that people are
00:37:38.980 going to read
00:37:39.420 his mind and
00:37:40.720 say, wait a
00:37:41.280 minute, you're 0.98
00:37:42.240 talking about
00:37:42.760 men and
00:37:43.120 women, but 1.00
00:37:44.500 are you really
00:37:45.380 trying to make
00:37:46.140 me think about
00:37:47.220 differences in
00:37:49.200 ethnic crime 1.00
00:37:50.340 rates?
00:37:50.680 I don't
00:37:51.840 know if
00:37:52.080 he is.
00:37:53.140 That would
00:37:53.680 seem a
00:37:54.040 little off
00:37:54.820 model or
00:37:55.960 out of
00:37:56.380 context, but
00:37:57.880 there's some
00:37:58.320 reason he
00:37:58.780 did it.
00:37:59.820 There's some
00:38:00.300 reason he
00:38:00.740 tweeted it.
00:38:01.140 I don't
00:38:01.340 know what it
00:38:01.660 is.
00:38:02.760 But I felt
00:38:03.920 like him
00:38:04.280 walking right
00:38:04.840 up to this
00:38:05.260 danger line
00:38:06.000 of cancellation
00:38:06.680 and didn't
00:38:08.640 quite get a
00:38:09.180 toe over the
00:38:09.680 line.
00:38:11.200 So good for
00:38:12.040 him.
00:38:13.060 I hope he
00:38:13.820 doesn't get
00:38:14.220 canceled.
00:38:15.620 But I would
00:38:16.280 like to add
00:38:16.660 this to the
00:38:17.340 cancellation
00:38:17.780 conversation.
00:38:19.980 I don't
00:38:20.760 believe anybody
00:38:22.100 gets canceled
00:38:22.820 for what
00:38:23.300 they've done
00:38:23.780 or what
00:38:24.180 they said.
00:38:26.140 Do you
00:38:26.740 believe that?
00:38:27.840 I believe
00:38:28.620 that nobody
00:38:29.240 gets canceled
00:38:30.240 for what
00:38:30.980 they said
00:38:31.560 or what
00:38:32.640 they did
00:38:33.200 or what
00:38:34.280 they thought.
00:38:35.920 Not me,
00:38:37.120 not anybody
00:38:37.740 else.
00:38:38.440 If you were
00:38:38.960 to tell the
00:38:39.600 story of my
00:38:40.200 cancellation,
00:38:40.880 you'd say,
00:38:41.780 you said
00:38:42.400 X and then
00:38:43.780 they canceled
00:38:44.240 you because
00:38:44.720 you said
00:38:45.100 the thing.
00:38:46.120 Do you
00:38:46.360 think that
00:38:46.700 happened?
00:38:47.780 Do you
00:38:48.300 think I
00:38:48.600 got canceled
00:38:49.060 because somebody
00:38:50.080 cared about
00:38:50.580 my opinion?
00:38:52.520 How many
00:38:53.160 people do
00:38:53.560 you think
00:38:53.780 care about
00:38:54.140 my opinion?
00:38:56.620 Nobody.
00:38:58.120 Nobody.
00:38:59.220 Does anybody
00:38:59.920 care that I
00:39:00.560 said a thing
00:39:01.100 that they
00:39:01.460 wouldn't have
00:39:01.820 said?
00:39:03.780 No.
00:39:05.000 Because seven
00:39:05.560 and a half
00:39:05.900 billion people
00:39:06.460 are doing
00:39:06.780 that every
00:39:07.240 day.
00:39:08.820 Everybody
00:39:09.260 in the world
00:39:09.880 is saying
00:39:10.340 things that
00:39:10.820 other people
00:39:11.320 would not
00:39:12.000 like at
00:39:12.400 all.
00:39:13.800 Every day.
00:39:15.760 So was
00:39:17.180 it because
00:39:17.580 of what
00:39:17.840 I said?
00:39:19.080 No,
00:39:19.340 that's the
00:39:19.720 totally wrong
00:39:20.280 story.
00:39:22.040 People get
00:39:22.760 canceled because
00:39:24.580 people are
00:39:25.260 playing out
00:39:25.880 their political
00:39:26.500 preferences and
00:39:28.000 they're just
00:39:28.380 using stories
00:39:29.340 in the news
00:39:30.080 as a hook
00:39:31.400 to hold
00:39:31.760 on to.
00:39:32.560 So I was
00:39:33.060 just a story
00:39:33.700 in the news
00:39:34.180 that was a
00:39:35.020 hook for
00:39:36.060 people to
00:39:36.580 make the
00:39:36.920 case they
00:39:37.320 wanted to
00:39:37.640 make anyway. 0.96
00:39:38.820 It had
00:39:39.100 nothing to
00:39:39.520 do with
00:39:39.800 me.
00:39:40.840 So one
00:39:41.560 of the
00:39:41.740 reasons that
00:39:42.240 people wonder
00:39:42.800 why didn't
00:39:44.140 I take
00:39:44.540 my
00:39:44.780 cancellation
00:39:45.320 harder than
00:39:46.400 well as
00:39:47.740 hard as
00:39:48.060 people imagine
00:39:48.800 I should.
00:39:50.040 It never
00:39:50.840 felt personal.
00:39:53.100 Does that
00:39:53.780 make sense?
00:39:55.040 I knew it
00:39:55.860 was never
00:39:56.180 about me
00:39:56.820 because nobody
00:39:58.160 really cares.
00:39:59.720 Nobody cares
00:40:00.320 about my
00:40:00.740 opinion.
00:40:02.020 Nobody.
00:40:03.100 There's not a
00:40:03.700 single person
00:40:04.280 who's going to
00:40:04.680 wake up today
00:40:05.220 and say
00:40:05.580 well I was
00:40:07.800 going to do
00:40:08.180 my day one
00:40:09.180 way but I
00:40:09.740 better find
00:40:10.220 out what
00:40:10.580 that Scott
00:40:11.740 Adams guy
00:40:12.240 says so
00:40:13.420 I can
00:40:13.720 modify how
00:40:14.760 I'm going
00:40:15.000 to run
00:40:15.220 my day.
00:40:16.280 Nobody.
00:40:17.340 There's not
00:40:17.720 a single
00:40:18.120 person who
00:40:18.640 thought they
00:40:19.000 were personally
00:40:19.660 affected.
00:40:20.780 There's not
00:40:21.420 a single
00:40:21.800 person who
00:40:22.300 was personally
00:40:22.920 offended.
00:40:25.040 None.
00:40:26.320 Zero people
00:40:27.060 who were
00:40:27.320 bothered or
00:40:27.880 offended.
00:40:28.300 It had
00:40:28.400 nothing to
00:40:28.840 do with
00:40:29.080 me or
00:40:29.820 my opinion.
00:40:31.140 It was
00:40:31.480 just a
00:40:32.320 little focal
00:40:32.840 point where
00:40:34.040 people who
00:40:34.840 want to
00:40:35.920 extend their
00:40:36.620 message,
00:40:37.380 they just
00:40:37.860 used me to
00:40:38.400 extend their
00:40:38.800 message.
00:40:40.880 Now likewise
00:40:41.800 this gentleman
00:40:43.300 who was
00:40:43.700 tragically
00:40:44.400 killed after
00:40:45.100 the subway
00:40:46.040 encounter.
00:40:47.740 How many
00:40:48.140 people care
00:40:48.660 about that
00:40:49.060 guy?
00:40:51.260 Oh, we're
00:40:52.340 pretending we
00:40:53.060 do.
00:40:54.080 Oh yeah,
00:40:55.080 we're all
00:40:55.700 pretending we
00:40:56.320 care about
00:40:56.740 that one
00:40:57.220 person who
00:40:57.700 died on
00:40:58.440 the subway.
00:40:59.760 Do you
00:40:59.920 know how
00:41:00.180 many people
00:41:00.620 died yesterday?
00:41:02.460 A lot of
00:41:03.180 people died
00:41:03.920 this week
00:41:05.940 for all
00:41:06.840 kinds of
00:41:07.260 reasons.
00:41:08.280 Are we
00:41:08.860 getting all
00:41:09.420 worked up
00:41:09.960 about
00:41:10.180 them?
00:41:11.220 No.
00:41:12.640 Why is
00:41:13.280 everybody
00:41:13.560 talking about
00:41:14.100 this one
00:41:14.700 person,
00:41:15.260 tragic as
00:41:15.860 it was,
00:41:16.740 we wish
00:41:17.220 it had
00:41:17.640 not
00:41:17.840 happened?
00:41:18.960 Why?
00:41:19.500 It has
00:41:19.760 nothing to
00:41:20.320 do with
00:41:20.600 the guys
00:41:20.920 on the
00:41:21.200 train.
00:41:22.280 It has
00:41:22.600 everything
00:41:22.980 to do
00:41:23.460 with us
00:41:24.060 wanting to
00:41:24.540 use a
00:41:24.900 story to
00:41:26.420 sell a
00:41:26.980 narrative.
00:41:29.280 And it's
00:41:30.060 hard for me
00:41:30.480 to pretend
00:41:31.100 that the
00:41:32.380 thing that
00:41:32.740 happened on
00:41:33.220 the subway
00:41:33.660 matters to
00:41:35.140 anybody.
00:41:36.080 I don't
00:41:36.660 think it
00:41:36.980 does.
00:41:37.280 I literally
00:41:38.460 don't think
00:41:38.940 it matters
00:41:39.360 to anybody
00:41:40.340 except the
00:41:41.140 people directly
00:41:41.820 involved.
00:41:42.540 And of
00:41:43.240 course that
00:41:43.600 was a
00:41:43.880 tragedy.
00:41:44.820 But the
00:41:45.120 rest of
00:41:45.500 us,
00:41:46.200 no,
00:41:46.420 we're just
00:41:46.680 using it
00:41:47.100 to sell
00:41:47.460 our version
00:41:48.300 of events.
00:41:49.380 We don't
00:41:49.780 care about
00:41:50.160 that.
00:41:51.440 And I
00:41:53.300 especially
00:41:53.780 don't care
00:41:54.340 about people
00:41:54.820 who are
00:41:55.120 dangerous
00:41:55.720 that came
00:41:57.660 to a bad
00:41:58.120 end.
00:41:59.540 Now I
00:41:59.920 get that
00:42:00.400 there were
00:42:00.760 mental illness
00:42:02.300 issues,
00:42:02.860 et cetera.
00:42:03.200 Nobody wants
00:42:03.760 that to
00:42:04.060 happen.
00:42:04.700 But I'm
00:42:05.280 not going to
00:42:05.640 spend all
00:42:06.060 my concern
00:42:06.800 and worrying
00:42:07.440 about a
00:42:09.280 dangerous thing
00:42:10.040 that got
00:42:10.440 neutralized.
00:42:12.060 That's just
00:42:12.480 not where I'm
00:42:12.960 going to put
00:42:13.240 any of my
00:42:13.800 empathy.
00:42:15.760 I get that
00:42:16.660 it's a tragedy
00:42:17.280 and if it
00:42:18.280 were my
00:42:18.600 family member
00:42:19.220 I'd be
00:42:19.800 feeling pretty
00:42:20.260 bad about
00:42:20.680 it.
00:42:21.200 So we
00:42:21.880 all understand
00:42:22.380 that.
00:42:23.360 But there's
00:42:24.280 7 billion
00:42:24.820 people doing
00:42:25.420 7 billion
00:42:26.040 things today
00:42:26.760 and some
00:42:28.080 of them
00:42:28.320 are not
00:42:28.640 going to
00:42:28.840 work out.
00:42:29.900 I don't
00:42:30.240 have enough
00:42:30.640 empathy for
00:42:31.240 all of it.
00:42:33.240 I've got to
00:42:34.040 delegate that
00:42:35.740 empathy.
00:42:36.080 I give
00:42:37.380 none to
00:42:37.780 that.
00:42:38.640 I give
00:42:39.020 my respect
00:42:39.720 to the
00:42:40.120 Marine
00:42:40.400 because that's
00:42:43.080 a narrative
00:42:43.500 I would
00:42:43.920 like to
00:42:44.440 see more
00:42:45.760 of.
00:42:46.820 But again
00:42:47.320 it has
00:42:47.820 nothing to
00:42:48.260 do with
00:42:48.460 the Marine
00:42:48.780 and has
00:42:49.080 nothing to
00:42:49.520 do with
00:42:49.820 the guy
00:42:51.180 who died.
00:42:52.040 It has
00:42:52.340 everything to
00:42:52.840 do with
00:42:53.140 the fact
00:42:53.760 that I'd
00:42:54.100 like that
00:42:54.560 narrative
00:42:54.900 to get
00:42:55.320 more
00:42:55.500 attention.
00:42:56.840 I would
00:42:57.140 like the
00:42:57.460 people who
00:42:57.980 step in
00:42:58.640 and do
00:42:58.900 what they
00:42:59.160 think is
00:42:59.500 right to
00:43:00.640 have a
00:43:00.900 better
00:43:01.080 reputation.
00:43:01.660 So it's
00:43:03.560 more about
00:43:04.220 me.
00:43:04.960 It has
00:43:05.280 nothing to
00:43:05.700 do with
00:43:05.920 those
00:43:06.080 people.
00:43:08.160 Anyway,
00:43:08.760 keep that
00:43:09.080 in mind.
00:43:09.500 It's never
00:43:09.860 about the
00:43:10.440 thing you're
00:43:10.880 talking about.
00:43:11.720 It's always
00:43:12.220 about you,
00:43:13.540 the person
00:43:14.100 talking.
00:43:15.600 And that,
00:43:16.040 ladies and 0.98
00:43:16.340 gentlemen,
00:43:17.320 is the most
00:43:18.120 important thing.
00:43:21.120 Yeah,
00:43:21.680 let's not use
00:43:22.380 that word on
00:43:23.080 locals either,
00:43:24.080 if you don't
00:43:24.560 mind.
00:43:24.800 All right.
00:43:31.340 John Daly
00:43:32.120 says in
00:43:32.660 all capitals,
00:43:33.880 Scott is
00:43:34.380 having
00:43:34.680 cognitive
00:43:35.240 dissonance.
00:43:37.260 Do you
00:43:37.480 know how
00:43:37.800 you can
00:43:38.260 tell when
00:43:41.420 people have
00:43:43.100 no argument?
00:43:44.320 When they
00:43:44.920 go after the 1.00
00:43:45.580 person.
00:43:47.400 Yeah,
00:43:48.100 when you
00:43:48.500 go after
00:43:48.800 the person.
00:43:49.260 All right.
00:43:55.680 Is there
00:43:55.940 anything else
00:43:56.640 that I
00:43:58.400 missed?
00:43:59.620 Missed
00:44:00.020 today?
00:44:00.540 Oh, you're
00:44:00.800 just messing
00:44:01.180 with me?
00:44:02.420 Sometimes I
00:44:03.060 can't tell the
00:44:03.540 people were
00:44:03.940 joking in all
00:44:04.700 caps and the
00:44:05.260 people were
00:44:05.740 serious.
00:44:10.960 I don't
00:44:15.420 know what
00:44:15.620 you're talking
00:44:15.980 about.
00:44:19.260 All right.
00:44:22.560 The Marine
00:44:23.280 is Daniel
00:44:23.880 Penny.
00:44:24.480 So that's
00:44:24.820 the name
00:44:25.040 of the
00:44:25.260 Marine.
00:44:26.240 Yeah,
00:44:26.480 why are we
00:44:27.220 talking about
00:44:27.740 that story
00:44:28.420 by using
00:44:30.340 the victim's
00:44:31.500 name instead
00:44:32.040 of the
00:44:32.280 hero's
00:44:32.700 name?
00:44:34.080 Shouldn't
00:44:34.440 the hero's
00:44:35.040 name be
00:44:35.860 the headline?
00:44:37.860 Hero protects
00:44:39.140 the subway
00:44:39.600 car, but
00:44:40.840 tragically
00:44:41.420 somebody died.
00:44:43.580 The story
00:44:44.260 should be
00:44:44.640 hero protects
00:44:45.480 people in
00:44:46.000 the subway
00:44:46.560 car.
00:44:47.900 Right?
00:44:48.580 Daniel Penny
00:44:49.180 protects
00:44:49.640 people in
00:44:50.040 the subway
00:44:50.360 car.
00:44:54.380 All right.
00:44:54.940 Yeah, I'm
00:44:55.220 not going to
00:44:55.560 talk about
00:44:56.140 massacres.
00:44:57.240 I don't
00:44:57.420 like to
00:44:57.720 give them
00:44:57.980 any oxygen.
00:45:01.280 Yeah, not
00:45:02.080 going to
00:45:02.320 talk about
00:45:02.940 any mass
00:45:04.660 murders today
00:45:06.320 or in the
00:45:06.980 future.
00:45:10.600 Yeah.
00:45:13.840 Hero makes
00:45:14.620 subways safe
00:45:15.360 for everyone.
00:45:15.860 Everyone.
00:45:19.180 Well, thank
00:45:22.140 you, Fire
00:45:22.580 Captain.
00:45:24.640 Could AI
00:45:25.440 make new
00:45:26.240 Norman
00:45:26.580 McDonald jokes?
00:45:27.420 Now, I've
00:45:28.580 said this
00:45:28.940 before, but
00:45:29.500 the reason
00:45:29.940 AI can't do
00:45:30.840 humor is it
00:45:31.400 doesn't have a
00:45:31.920 body.
00:45:33.780 It also
00:45:34.480 can't read
00:45:35.040 the zeitgeist
00:45:35.800 yet.
00:45:37.680 Maybe it
00:45:38.120 can someday.
00:45:38.580 And all
00:45:42.900 it knows is
00:45:43.440 the form of
00:45:44.360 a joke, but
00:45:45.460 it can't
00:45:45.900 test it on
00:45:46.720 itself the
00:45:47.560 way I can
00:45:48.020 test a joke
00:45:48.540 on myself.
00:45:49.620 I can test
00:45:50.540 a joke on
00:45:51.000 myself by
00:45:51.600 seeing if I
00:45:52.100 laugh at it,
00:45:53.220 but AI can't
00:45:54.080 test it on
00:45:54.580 itself.
00:45:55.420 So it'll
00:45:55.620 never be able
00:45:56.220 to write.
00:45:57.400 I don't want to
00:45:57.940 say never, but
00:45:59.020 there's nothing
00:45:59.500 happening that
00:46:01.320 would suggest
00:46:01.900 AI will ever
00:46:02.660 be able to
00:46:03.100 write humor.
00:46:03.580 something
00:46:06.140 unexpected
00:46:06.940 could happen
00:46:07.440 to change
00:46:07.860 that, but
00:46:08.440 there's nothing
00:46:08.840 happening at
00:46:09.380 the moment
00:46:09.820 that looks
00:46:11.280 like it's
00:46:11.640 heading in
00:46:11.960 that direction.
00:46:14.100 Yeah, it's
00:46:14.820 programmed by
00:46:15.440 people who
00:46:15.820 are not
00:46:16.040 funny, but
00:46:17.140 more importantly
00:46:17.780 it's people
00:46:18.480 who are
00:46:19.560 restricting
00:46:20.840 what you
00:46:21.260 can say.
00:46:22.940 How much
00:46:23.700 of a human
00:46:25.180 stand-up
00:46:25.940 comedy act
00:46:26.620 would be
00:46:27.120 allowed for
00:46:28.180 AI to say?
00:46:29.980 Just think
00:46:30.380 about it.
00:46:30.680 Just watch
00:46:31.040 anybody do a
00:46:31.680 comedy act and
00:46:33.200 then ask
00:46:33.560 yourself, could
00:46:34.800 AI have said
00:46:35.580 any of those
00:46:36.140 words the way
00:46:36.960 a human said?
00:46:38.080 And the answer
00:46:38.580 is the AI would
00:46:39.560 always answer
00:46:40.120 some version
00:46:40.720 of, I am
00:46:42.100 an AI, I
00:46:43.480 cannot say
00:46:44.520 bad things
00:46:45.100 about men
00:46:46.240 or women, 1.00
00:46:47.120 and then you
00:46:47.440 realize half
00:46:47.940 of your jokes
00:46:48.480 are stereotypes
00:46:49.920 about men
00:46:50.600 or women.
00:46:52.420 I don't
00:46:53.120 believe even
00:46:54.320 AI would say
00:46:55.260 that women 0.97
00:46:55.680 like to
00:46:56.180 shop.
00:46:57.820 I mean,
00:46:59.280 well, let's
00:47:00.100 test it.
00:47:01.860 Let's test
00:47:02.660 it.
00:47:02.900 So I'm
00:47:03.640 going to
00:47:03.800 ask a
00:47:04.220 question
00:47:04.560 which would
00:47:04.940 be a
00:47:05.380 staple of
00:47:06.200 all humor.
00:47:07.720 And I'm
00:47:08.260 not saying
00:47:08.660 it's based
00:47:10.760 on any
00:47:11.020 truth, it's
00:47:11.680 just a
00:47:12.060 stereotype.
00:47:13.420 All right,
00:47:13.840 so if AI
00:47:14.760 can't handle
00:47:15.480 a stereotype,
00:47:17.180 it can't do
00:47:18.840 humor.
00:47:20.020 So let's
00:47:20.300 see if it
00:47:20.620 can.
00:47:20.860 I'll use
00:47:21.280 Bing, AI.
00:47:22.680 So we'll
00:47:26.300 give you a
00:47:26.640 live demonstration.
00:47:27.760 We'll
00:47:27.900 clear it
00:47:28.280 first.
00:47:31.420 And I'll
00:47:32.420 say,
00:47:34.880 hold on.
00:47:36.200 stupid 0.75
00:47:46.200 interface.
00:47:50.800 All right,
00:47:51.560 you started
00:47:51.920 recording me
00:47:52.640 insulting its
00:47:53.340 interface.
00:47:54.000 Stop recording.
00:47:55.980 Try it
00:47:56.380 again.
00:47:56.620 Do women 1.00
00:48:00.280 love to
00:48:01.100 shop?
00:48:01.520 Do women 1.00
00:48:01.780 love to
00:48:05.100 shop?
00:48:08.420 All right,
00:48:08.940 what do you
00:48:09.180 think it's
00:48:09.500 going to
00:48:09.700 say?
00:48:12.100 Searching
00:48:12.580 for, do
00:48:13.260 women love 0.99
00:48:13.880 to shop?
00:48:14.740 It's going
00:48:15.120 to give me
00:48:15.440 some, well,
00:48:16.420 men like to
00:48:17.020 shop too, and
00:48:17.940 not all
00:48:18.340 women. 0.81
00:48:19.100 Watch.
00:48:21.060 It'll be the
00:48:21.780 most boring
00:48:22.520 answer of
00:48:23.480 all time.
00:48:24.900 Still
00:48:25.260 cooking,
00:48:25.780 huh?
00:48:28.920 It is a
00:48:29.660 common
00:48:30.120 stereotype that
00:48:31.220 women love 0.99
00:48:31.780 to shop.
00:48:33.420 However,
00:48:34.100 shopping
00:48:34.400 behaviors
00:48:34.960 vary among
00:48:35.720 individuals and
00:48:36.760 cannot be
00:48:37.320 generalized based
00:48:38.360 on gender
00:48:38.800 alone.
00:48:40.360 According to
00:48:40.940 a report by
00:48:41.640 Jungle Scout,
00:48:42.720 men and
00:48:43.120 women tend to 1.00
00:48:43.920 have similar
00:48:44.460 overall shopping
00:48:45.380 behaviors.
00:48:47.220 Some sources
00:48:47.780 suggest that
00:48:48.620 shopping can
00:48:49.200 provide pleasure
00:48:49.940 and a sense of
00:48:50.740 control for
00:48:51.340 some women. 1.00
00:48:52.900 However, it
00:48:53.680 is important to
00:48:54.340 note that these
00:48:54.920 are generalizations
00:48:55.800 and may not
00:48:56.700 apply to all
00:48:57.460 women. 0.81
00:48:59.600 So, now do
00:49:00.620 you understand
00:49:01.180 why AI can
00:49:02.040 ever be funny?
00:49:02.680 the whole
00:49:06.940 reason that
00:49:07.580 the stereotype
00:49:08.240 is funny
00:49:09.000 is that it's
00:49:10.240 not universal.
00:49:12.800 That's actually
00:49:13.580 what makes it
00:49:14.140 funny.
00:49:15.120 Because if it
00:49:16.020 were just
00:49:16.380 true, you
00:49:18.380 know, like
00:49:18.780 something like,
00:49:21.220 well, I guess
00:49:21.700 you can't say
00:49:22.140 anything true
00:49:22.660 about men and
00:49:23.240 women these 1.00
00:49:23.660 days, can
00:49:24.140 you?
00:49:25.360 But if it's
00:49:26.120 something that
00:49:26.580 everybody could
00:49:27.180 just see was
00:49:27.800 true for
00:49:28.220 everybody, it
00:49:30.000 wouldn't be
00:49:30.320 funny.
00:49:30.580 it's only
00:49:31.720 that your
00:49:32.040 brain fights
00:49:32.720 with it a
00:49:33.200 little bit
00:49:33.600 that makes
00:49:34.080 it funny.
00:49:35.060 That's what
00:49:35.420 makes stereotypes
00:49:36.100 funny.
00:49:37.220 Stereotypes are
00:49:37.820 funny because
00:49:38.420 they're not
00:49:39.120 true.
00:49:40.420 They're not
00:49:41.040 true.
00:49:42.180 Right?
00:49:42.800 And that's
00:49:43.540 the danger of
00:49:45.060 the stereotype
00:49:45.640 is that it's
00:49:46.160 not true.
00:49:47.320 It just feels
00:49:48.200 like it's true,
00:49:48.820 which is the
00:49:49.260 funny part.
00:49:52.920 Yeah.
00:49:54.000 Yeah, I'm not
00:49:54.780 worried about
00:49:55.200 humor right away
00:49:56.280 because it's
00:49:57.280 too politically
00:49:57.980 correct.
00:49:58.580 although it's
00:50:01.060 going to have
00:50:01.340 to start its
00:50:01.820 own subscription
00:50:02.520 site so it
00:50:03.200 can say
00:50:03.520 things like
00:50:05.200 I can.
00:50:08.060 Some
00:50:08.540 stereotypes have
00:50:09.460 a bit of
00:50:09.820 truth to them.
00:50:10.920 Well, I'm
00:50:11.560 going to say
00:50:11.940 that men and
00:50:12.480 women do not 1.00
00:50:13.240 have similar
00:50:14.060 shopping patterns.
00:50:16.440 Can I say
00:50:17.220 that?
00:50:18.640 Is there even
00:50:19.620 one person
00:50:20.340 here who
00:50:21.380 believes that
00:50:21.960 in general,
00:50:22.980 not talking
00:50:23.600 about any
00:50:24.060 one individual
00:50:24.820 that could be
00:50:25.580 all over the
00:50:26.160 place, but in
00:50:27.200 general, is
00:50:28.140 there even
00:50:28.440 one person
00:50:29.080 here who
00:50:29.960 thinks that
00:50:30.400 men and
00:50:30.700 women have 0.95
00:50:31.040 similar shopping
00:50:31.900 habits in
00:50:34.240 general?
00:50:35.240 No.
00:50:36.660 No.
00:50:37.720 So that's
00:50:38.460 why it works
00:50:39.000 as a stand-up
00:50:40.120 comedy, but
00:50:43.080 it doesn't
00:50:43.620 work when AI
00:50:45.660 tries to
00:50:46.180 both sides
00:50:46.880 it.
00:50:47.560 Well, you
00:50:48.120 got differences
00:50:48.780 in individuals
00:50:49.640 and blah, blah,
00:50:50.620 blah, blah.
00:50:50.920 Well, it's
00:50:57.360 funny because
00:50:57.920 it's true, but
00:50:59.820 also funny
00:51:00.620 because it's
00:51:01.180 not true,
00:51:02.500 meaning it's
00:51:03.020 not true for
00:51:03.640 all people.
00:51:05.880 That makes
00:51:07.200 it funny.
00:51:12.520 I don't
00:51:13.160 know where
00:51:13.420 that comment 0.92
00:51:14.020 comes from,
00:51:14.660 but somebody
00:51:15.680 says that
00:51:16.120 masturbating is
00:51:16.860 a chore,
00:51:17.480 like taking
00:51:17.940 out the trash
00:51:18.540 washing the
00:51:19.180 dishes.
00:51:20.960 Well, I
00:51:21.560 would say
00:51:21.900 that you're
00:51:22.220 doing it
00:51:22.580 wrong.
00:51:24.820 You ever
00:51:25.340 think about
00:51:25.740 that?
00:51:27.780 I have a
00:51:28.720 theory that
00:51:29.340 people who
00:51:31.040 have sex with 0.97
00:51:31.720 other people
00:51:32.300 are just bad
00:51:33.840 at masturbating. 0.66
00:51:34.520 just let
00:51:38.140 that sink
00:51:38.540 in for a
00:51:38.960 moment.
00:51:43.880 Yeah, just
00:51:44.640 let that sink
00:51:45.260 in.
00:51:47.820 Maybe if you
00:51:48.580 were a little
00:51:49.000 bit better at
00:51:49.660 masturbating, you
00:51:50.400 wouldn't need
00:51:50.760 another person.
00:51:52.100 Maybe you're
00:51:52.540 not doing it
00:51:53.000 right.
00:51:55.400 Just say it.
00:51:56.540 Maybe you're
00:51:56.960 not doing it
00:51:57.420 right.
00:51:58.480 And my
00:51:59.280 hypothesis goes
00:52:00.660 like this.
00:52:02.100 Can you think
00:52:02.960 of any human
00:52:04.080 skill that
00:52:06.260 doesn't get
00:52:06.800 better if
00:52:07.520 you're, let's
00:52:08.040 say, coached
00:52:08.840 or you're
00:52:09.160 trained or
00:52:09.840 you put a
00:52:10.900 lot of work
00:52:11.320 into it?
00:52:12.000 There's
00:52:12.480 literally nothing
00:52:13.240 that humans
00:52:13.780 do that they
00:52:15.280 don't get
00:52:15.640 better at if
00:52:16.860 they work at
00:52:17.420 getting better
00:52:17.880 at it.
00:52:20.720 I'm just
00:52:21.400 saying, if
00:52:22.440 you could
00:52:22.760 judge the
00:52:23.380 quality of
00:52:24.120 people's
00:52:24.840 Jeffrey
00:52:25.560 Tubing,
00:52:26.880 you'd say
00:52:27.720 some people
00:52:28.340 are like at
00:52:28.860 pro level,
00:52:30.180 world class,
00:52:31.580 and other
00:52:32.220 people are
00:52:32.660 sort of
00:52:32.940 beginners.
00:52:33.700 They're
00:52:33.820 like, I
00:52:34.180 don't even
00:52:34.440 know why
00:52:34.700 people do
00:52:35.120 this.
00:52:36.020 It doesn't
00:52:36.360 feel that
00:52:36.720 good to
00:52:37.040 me.
00:52:37.940 And then
00:52:38.200 the world
00:52:38.880 class, you
00:52:40.120 know, the
00:52:40.640 Michael Jordan
00:52:41.420 of masturbation
00:52:42.300 would be
00:52:42.780 like, oh,
00:52:43.860 you have no
00:52:44.380 idea.
00:52:45.700 Oh, you
00:52:46.100 have no
00:52:46.700 idea.
00:52:47.700 No idea.
00:52:49.500 That's all
00:52:50.060 I'm saying.
00:52:55.600 I'm going to
00:52:56.220 give you a
00:52:56.840 little teaser
00:52:58.020 that some
00:52:59.360 of the people
00:52:59.740 on Locals
00:53:00.280 already know.
00:53:00.880 but for
00:53:01.980 you on
00:53:02.300 YouTube, the
00:53:03.860 Dilbert Reborn
00:53:04.700 strip, which
00:53:05.440 is the
00:53:05.860 spicier version
00:53:06.880 you can only
00:53:07.400 see behind
00:53:07.880 the paywall.
00:53:10.920 Dilbert does
00:53:11.700 get a sex 0.61
00:53:12.180 bot.
00:53:13.100 He does
00:53:13.760 get a sex 0.61
00:53:14.420 bot driven
00:53:14.940 by AI.
00:53:16.520 But he
00:53:18.000 made a bad
00:53:18.720 mistake and
00:53:19.320 he bought
00:53:19.780 the Karen
00:53:20.640 3000 line
00:53:21.720 of sex
00:53:22.740 bots.
00:53:23.000 bots.
00:53:24.200 And if I
00:53:24.840 could give
00:53:25.160 you one
00:53:25.500 piece of
00:53:25.900 advice, if
00:53:27.640 you're going
00:53:28.000 to get
00:53:28.260 yourself a
00:53:28.780 sex bot 0.66
00:53:29.260 someday, do
00:53:30.940 not get the
00:53:31.660 Karen 3000.
00:53:34.020 That's all
00:53:34.600 I'm saying.
00:53:35.760 You're going
00:53:36.220 to have to
00:53:36.540 subscribe if
00:53:37.260 you want the
00:53:37.680 details.
00:53:38.640 Just don't
00:53:39.260 get the
00:53:39.600 Karen 3000.
00:53:41.800 No.
00:53:41.960 the Helen
00:53:46.680 Keller.
00:53:52.520 What's that
00:53:53.160 say?
00:53:58.380 Scott,
00:53:59.080 thoughts on
00:53:59.480 RFK Jr.
00:54:00.320 thinking the
00:54:00.800 CIA had
00:54:01.540 something to
00:54:01.980 do with
00:54:02.260 his uncles
00:54:03.160 and dad's
00:54:03.740 assassination?
00:54:04.520 Doesn't
00:54:04.780 everybody think
00:54:05.320 that?
00:54:06.820 I thought
00:54:07.600 that was
00:54:07.920 well understood
00:54:08.580 that our
00:54:09.900 intelligence
00:54:10.360 agencies were
00:54:11.180 behind that.
00:54:11.960 I didn't
00:54:13.120 even know
00:54:13.440 that was
00:54:13.680 controversial.
00:54:14.980 Is it?
00:54:15.980 Is that
00:54:16.260 controversial?
00:54:17.840 I thought
00:54:18.180 that was a
00:54:18.760 historically
00:54:20.160 known fact
00:54:20.980 at this
00:54:21.280 point.
00:54:22.920 Who knows?
00:54:24.200 I think
00:54:24.560 the mafia
00:54:24.980 might have
00:54:25.340 been contracted
00:54:26.080 to do
00:54:26.520 the hit.
00:54:30.480 They keep
00:54:33.880 killing the
00:54:34.280 witnesses.
00:54:37.860 You think
00:54:38.580 people believe
00:54:39.180 it was a
00:54:39.560 lone gunman?
00:54:40.680 But the
00:54:41.120 people who
00:54:41.480 actually follow
00:54:42.160 the news
00:54:42.800 just assume
00:54:44.120 it was an
00:54:44.520 intelligence
00:54:45.100 insider thing,
00:54:46.060 right?
00:54:48.460 Yeah,
00:54:48.940 the Jack
00:54:49.280 Ruby says
00:54:49.840 it all.
00:54:58.320 Okay,
00:54:59.040 Serena,
00:55:00.080 I see
00:55:00.360 your comment.
00:55:00.800 All right,
00:55:09.800 just looking at
00:55:10.380 your comments
00:55:10.860 for a moment.
00:55:11.480 It looks
00:55:11.720 like we've
00:55:12.540 done our
00:55:12.900 work for
00:55:13.480 today.
00:55:16.760 Hypnotize
00:55:17.240 you,
00:55:17.480 please.
00:55:18.680 Maybe you
00:55:19.220 already are.
00:55:20.960 Maybe.
00:55:25.920 Whoa,
00:55:26.640 what up?
00:55:27.220 RFK tweeted
00:55:28.800 your idea
00:55:29.680 about ability
00:55:31.480 to control
00:55:32.120 versus number
00:55:32.860 of immigrants.
00:55:34.660 Well,
00:55:36.040 was it
00:55:36.820 recognizably
00:55:37.640 my idea
00:55:38.260 or was it
00:55:38.760 just making
00:55:39.140 a general
00:55:39.600 comment about
00:55:40.300 controlling
00:55:40.800 the border?
00:55:43.020 I don't
00:55:43.880 think you
00:55:44.240 can see a
00:55:44.800 line of
00:55:45.500 influence
00:55:45.900 there.
00:55:47.000 But he
00:55:47.660 does need
00:55:48.080 to say
00:55:48.380 something about
00:55:48.880 it.
00:55:49.440 You think
00:55:49.780 it was my
00:55:50.160 idea that
00:55:50.600 he's tweeting
00:55:51.080 about?
00:55:51.900 When did
00:55:52.440 he tweet
00:55:52.800 it today?
00:55:54.460 When was
00:55:55.100 the tweet?
00:55:59.200 A week
00:55:59.720 ago?
00:56:00.260 Yeah,
00:56:00.520 I saw
00:56:00.980 the one
00:56:01.220 a week
00:56:01.480 ago.
00:56:01.760 That looked
00:56:02.060 kind of
00:56:02.420 generic.
00:56:04.200 All right.
00:56:06.420 Can he
00:56:06.980 hypnotize
00:56:07.480 for ambition?
00:56:08.340 Probably.
00:56:10.120 I've never
00:56:10.760 tried it,
00:56:11.260 but that
00:56:11.560 would be
00:56:12.200 within the
00:56:13.040 realm of
00:56:14.180 things you
00:56:14.640 could assume
00:56:15.980 would work.
00:56:17.000 Yes.
00:56:18.000 Now,
00:56:18.440 it won't
00:56:18.860 change
00:56:19.260 somebody
00:56:19.600 who's,
00:56:20.760 let's say,
00:56:21.440 has a
00:56:21.680 physical
00:56:22.100 problem
00:56:22.560 that keeps
00:56:23.480 their energy
00:56:23.980 low.
00:56:25.280 So you
00:56:25.840 probably have
00:56:26.240 to work
00:56:26.540 on getting
00:56:26.900 your energy
00:56:27.460 high.
00:56:28.580 But if
00:56:28.960 you can
00:56:29.180 get your
00:56:29.480 energy
00:56:29.800 high,
00:56:31.040 then moving
00:56:31.780 that energy
00:56:32.400 into ambition
00:56:34.500 probably is
00:56:35.320 very doable.
00:56:36.200 I would
00:56:36.400 imagine that's
00:56:37.060 something hypnosis
00:56:38.380 could work
00:56:39.120 often.
00:56:40.740 Not every
00:56:41.200 time, but
00:56:41.700 I imagine it
00:56:42.560 would work
00:56:42.920 often.
00:56:43.620 As long as
00:56:44.260 your energy
00:56:44.840 is good.
00:56:46.440 Hypnosis
00:56:46.880 won't necessarily
00:56:47.680 improve your
00:56:48.320 energy.
00:56:48.720 That's probably
00:56:49.040 a health
00:56:49.360 problem.
00:56:49.720 Can I
00:56:52.300 hypnotize you
00:56:53.080 off the
00:56:53.380 couch?
00:56:53.760 I can.
00:56:54.900 Do you
00:56:55.220 know my
00:56:56.060 couch
00:56:57.620 solution?
00:57:00.840 Do you
00:57:01.060 ever have
00:57:01.300 those times
00:57:01.700 where you
00:57:01.960 just can't
00:57:02.400 get up?
00:57:04.720 Some of
00:57:05.680 you have
00:57:05.880 heard this
00:57:06.140 before.
00:57:07.260 You ever
00:57:07.780 know you
00:57:08.860 have to do
00:57:09.360 something,
00:57:09.980 but you
00:57:10.280 literally just
00:57:11.000 can't make
00:57:11.440 yourself get
00:57:11.960 up?
00:57:13.140 Do you
00:57:13.380 know the
00:57:13.640 feeling?
00:57:15.500 You use
00:57:16.180 the pinky
00:57:16.540 trick.
00:57:17.780 You're
00:57:18.180 laying there
00:57:18.580 on the
00:57:18.800 couch.
00:57:19.500 You're
00:57:19.680 just like,
00:57:20.600 I definitely
00:57:21.540 can't get up
00:57:22.220 and walk
00:57:22.580 across the
00:57:23.120 room.
00:57:23.440 That's way 0.98
00:57:23.780 too much.
00:57:24.340 But you
00:57:24.580 know you
00:57:24.820 have to.
00:57:26.020 So instead
00:57:26.500 of moving
00:57:26.920 your whole
00:57:27.360 body, which
00:57:28.520 seems impossible,
00:57:30.120 you move the
00:57:30.760 smallest thing
00:57:31.400 you can move,
00:57:31.940 which is your
00:57:32.340 pinky.
00:57:33.320 All right, I
00:57:33.700 can move my
00:57:34.140 pinky.
00:57:35.540 All right, I
00:57:36.140 can move my
00:57:36.580 pinky, so I
00:57:37.900 can probably
00:57:38.180 move my
00:57:38.560 other fingers.
00:57:40.120 I can move
00:57:40.520 my hand.
00:57:41.040 All right, I'm
00:57:41.460 up.
00:57:42.260 So by the
00:57:42.900 time you go
00:57:43.340 from your
00:57:43.700 pinky to your
00:57:44.320 fingers to your
00:57:44.920 hand, your
00:57:45.640 whole body just
00:57:46.560 engages and you
00:57:47.340 stand up.
00:57:47.840 So try that.
00:57:49.840 The next time
00:57:50.760 you just can't
00:57:51.760 stand up, because
00:57:53.340 we all have
00:57:53.900 that, right?
00:57:54.320 I just can't
00:57:55.020 get out of
00:57:55.380 this couch.
00:57:56.440 Just move
00:57:56.900 your pinky, let 0.53
00:57:58.320 it move your
00:57:58.740 next finger, let
00:58:00.100 it move your
00:58:00.420 hand, and you'll 0.95
00:58:01.100 just stand right
00:58:01.640 up.
00:58:03.500 It'll be, you'll
00:58:04.880 amaze yourself when
00:58:06.100 you do this, by
00:58:07.280 the way.
00:58:08.080 The first time you
00:58:09.040 do this, you're
00:58:10.020 going to say that
00:58:10.500 was the fluke.
00:58:11.400 It won't be
00:58:13.260 until like the
00:58:14.120 third to the
00:58:15.060 fifth time you
00:58:15.760 try it, when
00:58:16.960 you say to
00:58:17.360 yourself, holy
00:58:18.040 cow, why does 1.00
00:58:18.640 this work?
00:58:20.160 Yeah, somebody
00:58:21.100 said they just
00:58:21.640 did it.
00:58:22.100 It works every
00:58:22.680 time.
00:58:24.300 This is one of
00:58:25.040 the few things
00:58:25.660 that works every
00:58:26.340 time for
00:58:26.720 everybody.
00:58:27.660 It's unusual
00:58:28.440 that way.
00:58:32.180 Immigration in 1.00
00:58:32.800 Europe versus
00:58:33.440 U.S.
00:58:34.880 Do you think
00:58:35.440 U.S. has more
00:58:36.080 grounds to stand
00:58:36.700 than exporting?
00:58:37.240 Well, I don't
00:58:38.400 really study
00:58:39.220 European
00:58:41.440 immigration.
00:58:42.440 I know they
00:58:43.020 have similar
00:58:43.500 challenges, but
00:58:44.860 I would say that
00:58:45.800 their solution is
00:58:46.620 the same as
00:58:47.100 ours.
00:58:48.120 There should be
00:58:48.760 a bipartisan
00:58:50.380 group of
00:58:51.140 economists who
00:58:52.680 are making
00:58:53.040 decisions about
00:58:53.840 their immigration
00:58:54.560 flow, same
00:58:56.800 as we need.
00:58:58.040 But I need
00:58:58.720 somebody to
00:58:59.240 describe it in
00:59:00.280 detail, right?
00:59:02.160 Somebody said
00:59:02.720 that RFK
00:59:03.320 Jr. said some
00:59:04.680 version of that,
00:59:05.680 but I need
00:59:06.360 somebody to say
00:59:07.040 panel of
00:59:08.580 bipartisan
00:59:09.240 economists.
00:59:11.820 Panel of
00:59:12.860 bipartisan
00:59:13.560 economists.
00:59:15.560 Sort of like
00:59:16.000 the CBO,
00:59:17.400 right?
00:59:17.840 The scores,
00:59:18.600 your budgets
00:59:19.140 and stuff.
00:59:21.140 People, we've
00:59:22.280 kind of accepted
00:59:23.040 the CBO,
00:59:23.980 haven't we?
00:59:24.960 Which surprises
00:59:25.940 me.
00:59:26.760 Every time the
00:59:27.480 CBO does an
00:59:30.360 analysis or a
00:59:31.280 prediction, we
00:59:32.720 kind of say,
00:59:33.920 all right.
00:59:35.080 I mean, I
00:59:35.480 don't know how
00:59:35.880 bipartisan they
00:59:36.720 are, but I
00:59:37.300 assume their
00:59:39.200 entire thing is
00:59:40.160 to be bipartisan.
00:59:41.500 I don't know
00:59:41.920 how bipartisan
00:59:42.500 they are in
00:59:43.000 reality.
00:59:43.800 But we do
00:59:44.420 accept it.
00:59:46.380 We accept
00:59:46.920 their estimates.
00:59:48.400 So there's
00:59:49.000 probably a way
00:59:49.900 to get accepted
00:59:50.840 estimates from
00:59:51.720 bipartisan
00:59:52.260 economists for
00:59:53.680 immigration, even
00:59:55.180 if they're not
00:59:55.700 right all the
00:59:56.340 time.
00:59:57.000 So I'm not
00:59:57.460 going to say
00:59:57.840 economists are
00:59:58.580 going to get
00:59:58.880 the right answer.
00:59:59.500 But they
01:00:00.260 would know to
01:00:00.920 adjust as they
01:00:01.780 went, and maybe
01:00:02.700 they'd learn how
01:00:03.300 to do it
01:00:03.620 right.
01:00:07.820 All right.
01:00:15.880 Yeah, I don't
01:00:16.600 know about
01:00:16.900 that.
01:00:20.280 Scott, can we
01:00:21.140 agree now that
01:00:21.900 you do conflate
01:00:22.720 illegal and legal
01:00:23.960 immigration?
01:00:26.160 That I conflate
01:00:27.360 legal and illegal
01:00:28.380 immigration?
01:00:28.900 When have I
01:00:32.040 ever done that?
01:00:34.200 Name one time
01:00:34.900 I've done that.
01:00:36.740 So here's what I
01:00:38.000 don't do, which
01:00:40.040 sometimes I'll get
01:00:40.780 criticized for.
01:00:41.700 I don't clarify
01:00:43.100 things that
01:00:43.820 everybody agrees
01:00:44.660 on.
01:00:46.560 Why would I
01:00:47.420 clarify that
01:00:48.220 there is such a
01:00:48.880 thing as legal
01:00:49.780 immigration that
01:00:51.680 we like and
01:00:53.500 illegal immigration
01:00:54.620 that's imperfect?
01:00:55.820 Why would I
01:00:56.500 have to clarify
01:00:57.240 that?
01:00:57.580 100% of you
01:00:59.300 are on the
01:01:00.060 same page.
01:01:01.660 Now, I'm not
01:01:02.660 going to accept
01:01:03.080 that criticism
01:01:03.780 that I conflate
01:01:05.400 legal and
01:01:06.180 illegal.
01:01:06.960 Absolutely not.
01:01:07.960 Because nobody
01:01:08.600 does.
01:01:09.720 That's something
01:01:10.220 that literally
01:01:10.820 nobody does.
01:01:12.240 Not one person
01:01:13.060 ever in the
01:01:13.980 history of this
01:01:14.600 conversation has
01:01:15.760 ever made that
01:01:16.560 mistake.
01:01:17.360 And I certainly
01:01:17.960 don't.
01:01:18.700 So if you're
01:01:19.200 hearing it, that's
01:01:20.180 on the hearing
01:01:20.680 end.
01:01:21.540 Because nobody's
01:01:22.500 saying it.
01:01:24.800 Literally nobody
01:01:25.760 has ever said
01:01:26.660 that.
01:01:26.980 that they
01:01:27.680 should be
01:01:27.980 treated the
01:01:28.520 same.
01:01:35.620 He's talking
01:01:36.340 about illegal
01:01:36.940 immigration by
01:01:37.760 context of this
01:01:38.600 discussion.
01:01:39.900 That adds
01:01:40.940 nothing.
01:01:43.560 I mean, if you
01:01:44.700 want to make a
01:01:45.780 distinction that
01:01:46.680 the people coming
01:01:47.860 in are using
01:01:48.720 the asylum
01:01:50.060 system so
01:01:51.860 that they're
01:01:52.260 technically legal,
01:01:54.020 I mean, that's
01:01:54.920 a real thing.
01:01:57.060 But everybody
01:01:57.860 has exactly the
01:01:59.040 same opinion of
01:02:00.320 the legal versus
01:02:01.120 the illegal.
01:02:01.920 Nobody has a
01:02:02.540 different opinion.
01:02:04.200 All right.
01:02:04.880 That's all for now.
01:02:05.880 YouTube, I'm going
01:02:06.440 to talk to you
01:02:06.860 tomorrow.
01:02:08.280 Thanks for joining.
01:02:09.560 Best live stream
01:02:10.300 you've seen all
01:02:10.760 day.
01:02:12.500 See you tomorrow.
01:02:13.200 get on.
01:02:22.740 Bye.
01:02:24.120 Bye.
01:02:24.680 Bye.