Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2102 Scott Adams： Marine Hero, Migration Tsunami, Barr On Trump, Putin vs Oligarchs, RFK Jr.

00:00:00.140 do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do good morning everybody and welcome to the

00:00:08.720 highlight of civilization where everything exciting and new and wonderful will happen

00:00:13.560 and it's going to happen any moment now and if you'd like to be part of the amazingness

00:00:19.480 that we call coffee with scott adams all you need to be part of this simultaneous sip is a

00:00:25.480 A cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or chalice or stein, a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:32.340 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.

00:00:35.500 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine here, the day, the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:41.340 It's called the Simultaneous Sip.

00:00:48.280 Ah.

00:00:51.740 So invigorating.

00:00:53.160 I feel alive. Alive.

00:00:57.880 Well, let's check the news.

00:01:00.240 I was just talking about this with the local subscribers before I went live on YouTube here.

00:01:06.000 And here's a funny little mystery that I want to see if you can solve.

00:01:12.240 Before I give you the answer, and on locals you already know the answer, but on YouTube,

00:01:18.200 tell me the height of Matt Gaetz.

00:01:22.780 Without Googling it, tell me the height of Matt Gaetz.

00:01:27.200 Go.

00:01:28.900 No, not 25%.

00:01:30.200 He's not 25% tall.

00:01:32.980 Give me his height.

00:01:33.900 I see 6'2", 6'1", oh, somebody Googled it.

00:01:42.440 Somebody Googled it.

00:01:44.120 All right, here's the answer.

00:01:46.900 Or actually, it's not the answer.

00:01:48.280 But what's interesting is if you Google it, he comes up as 5'7".

00:01:53.680 Is there any chance he's 5'7"?

00:01:57.320 There's none.

00:01:59.280 If you look at pictures of him standing next to Trump, they're about the same height.

00:02:04.080 Yeah, I don't know what he is, but he's not 5'7".

00:02:06.280 So how in the world does the entire Internet get the height of a prominent member of Congress wrong?

00:02:16.320 Where did that come from?

00:02:17.440 Was that kind of a prank?

00:02:20.360 I mean, somebody said they saw that and they were starting to doubt the Internet about my IQ.

00:02:27.300 Because, you know, my IQ is usually listed at 180.

00:02:29.880 And people are starting to say, well, wait a minute.

00:02:33.500 If Matt Gaetz is listed at 5'7", if that's not true, could it be also true that Scott's IQ is not 180?

00:02:44.000 And I think, no, anything's possible.

00:02:47.540 All right, well, I think it's funny that we have such an easily fact-checked thing that the Internet has wrong.

00:02:55.600 Pretty sure it's wrong.

00:02:57.600 Somebody's going to have to measure him and get back to me.

00:02:59.880 All right.

00:03:04.000 Let's talk about this, the situation about the Marine who put a chokehold on the gentleman who died in the subway.

00:03:15.380 Now, in my opinion, the Marine is a hero.

00:03:21.320 And I won't hear any arguments on the other side.

00:03:24.520 I'm just so done with this, everything's got to be a George Floyd.

00:03:30.520 No, everything isn't George Floyd.

00:03:33.000 Sometimes you're just reminded of it.

00:03:35.440 But this is very different.

00:03:37.880 The other thing that is a, let's say, a curiosity.

00:03:42.100 If there are any doctors here, there are usually some doctors watching the live stream.

00:03:47.540 If there are any doctors here, identify yourself when you answer this question, if you're willing.

00:03:51.640 If somebody dies from being choked, don't they usually die while they're being choked?

00:04:00.180 Because this individual was very much alive after the choking.

00:04:05.860 He didn't look in good shape, but he was very much alive and breathing.

00:04:09.940 Is there such a thing as dying from the choking, but like an hour later?

00:04:15.100 Is that something that can happen?

00:04:20.340 Brain damage?

00:04:24.700 Let's not talk about George Floyd.

00:04:30.300 But I guess I just don't know the answer to that question.

00:04:34.140 But I'll tell you what things are obvious.

00:04:37.640 What's obvious from the video is that nobody involved thought anything like a murder was happening.

00:04:45.100 Would you agree?

00:04:46.460 That there was nobody who was a witness who was aware of anything that looked like killing.

00:04:53.700 And when it was over, at least the part where they're holding down was over,

00:04:58.240 it still didn't look like anybody got killed because he was still alive.

00:05:02.540 So they were concerned about him.

00:05:04.220 So obviously their intention was not to kill him.

00:05:06.960 So there's no intention involved there.

00:05:08.740 So I feel like it's time to turn the corner on the bullshit.

00:05:16.640 We don't just have to assume the white guy's guilty and the black guy's innocent and he lived a wonderful life.

00:05:24.060 Sometimes the people who get killed, it's unfortunate,

00:05:28.720 but it's not because anybody did anything necessarily wrong.

00:05:32.540 So I'm not going to back down on this one.

00:05:38.080 I don't know about you, but I'm just not going to accept the narrative.

00:05:41.020 It's just not George Floyd.

00:05:42.440 Stop talking about him.

00:05:44.220 It has nothing to do with this.

00:05:45.980 This was somebody who probably looks like he had some mental problems.

00:05:50.900 But that was not anybody else's problem.

00:05:54.920 The people who were being threatened by him,

00:05:57.240 it wasn't their problem that he had a mental problem.

00:05:59.320 Well, their problem is that they were in danger or potential danger.

00:06:04.000 And they found a solution for it.

00:06:06.640 And nobody else got hurt.

00:06:09.120 So I would call that a horrible situation,

00:06:12.200 which unfortunately was pretty much prescribed by the elements that went into it.

00:06:19.080 It was sort of the only way it could have come up.

00:06:21.060 Apparently the way it happened is the only way it could have happened

00:06:23.940 given the variables that went into the situation.

00:06:26.080 So I'm not going to be outraged by that,

00:06:30.460 even though we can be...

00:06:32.040 You can have empathy for anybody who died, of course.

00:06:35.840 But I can't be outraged for any political reason about that.

00:06:41.040 All right.

00:06:44.660 Bill Barr had some words about Trump.

00:06:48.500 So as you know, Bill Barr was in the Trump administration.

00:06:51.400 So he got to see things from the inside.

00:06:54.620 But he thinks that even if you like Trump policies,

00:06:57.940 that Trump is uniquely unable to deliver them.

00:07:01.900 And that the only things that Trump accomplished

00:07:04.040 are things that probably any Republican could have done.

00:07:09.120 What do you think of that?

00:07:10.840 And that what Trump adds is chaos,

00:07:13.780 and he doesn't know how to manage toward getting something.

00:07:17.180 He's more like somebody who injects chaos,

00:07:20.480 and the only things that get done

00:07:21.640 are the things that any Republican could have gotten done.

00:07:26.060 What do you think?

00:07:28.460 Now, one example of that would be build the wall.

00:07:32.920 So build the wall is something

00:07:34.400 that not every standard Republican necessarily wanted,

00:07:38.800 but he couldn't get it done.

00:07:42.500 That's a good point.

00:07:44.760 Fentanyl didn't get it done.

00:07:47.180 Would you agree?

00:07:48.800 There was no real change in Fentanyl.

00:07:52.600 So I would say he did not,

00:07:54.760 although he did do a great job

00:07:56.340 of reducing immigration at the border.

00:08:00.100 But would a traditional Republican have done that?

00:08:05.040 I'm going to say no.

00:08:07.120 It feels like they wouldn't have.

00:08:09.400 It feels like that was uniquely Trump.

00:08:12.300 The other thing that's uniquely Trump

00:08:14.060 is the stuff that didn't happen.

00:08:16.540 It's hard to give somebody credit for things that didn't happen,

00:08:20.000 but how about he didn't start any new wars?

00:08:24.480 How about that?

00:08:25.400 And the only one he was involved with,

00:08:26.960 he wound down or won.

00:08:28.980 He won against ISIS,

00:08:31.980 and he wound down Afghanistan,

00:08:34.560 which wasn't a useful war.

00:08:37.040 So I don't agree with Bill Barr

00:08:39.780 that Trump has nothing unique to add.

00:08:43.280 He does have something unique to add.

00:08:44.760 And I think that he uniquely can get us out of the Ukraine situation.

00:08:48.360 I think he could uniquely do something useful with Taiwan.

00:08:54.000 And he makes me laugh every time he tells his strategy out loud,

00:08:59.280 when he brags about the fact that,

00:09:02.640 when he said that Moscow would be a risk if Putin took,

00:09:07.540 I don't know, whatever, Ukraine or something.

00:09:09.180 And he laughs about the fact,

00:09:12.460 or he jokes,

00:09:14.340 that if Putin only believed there was a 10% chance he was serious,

00:09:20.400 that was still enough to deter him.

00:09:22.880 But it's funny,

00:09:23.520 because Trump talks about it like it's not serious.

00:09:27.560 He just needs the other person to think he might be.

00:09:31.880 And that's enough.

00:09:33.220 And it might be.

00:09:34.020 That might be enough.

00:09:35.340 I don't know.

00:09:35.720 That's a hard claim to check.

00:09:39.740 But I would partially agree with Barr

00:09:43.420 in that Trump probably brings more chaos.

00:09:49.520 But I wonder if the situation would be the same

00:09:53.280 with the second presidency.

00:09:56.160 Do you think if Trump did a second round,

00:09:59.580 he would have weak advisors

00:10:01.740 because he'd have the same problem?

00:10:03.420 Nobody wants to work with him?

00:10:04.580 You know, the people with the most capability

00:10:07.040 don't want to get near the blast center?

00:10:12.380 So you think he'd be able to get higher quality advisors

00:10:15.820 and operatives than last time?

00:10:19.360 I think he would.

00:10:20.640 I think he just knows the landscape better.

00:10:23.180 So he'd know who to hire and who not to?

00:10:27.740 I don't know.

00:10:29.120 Could go either way.

00:10:29.960 So, titled 42 ends,

00:10:34.740 so that's the immigration thing that would,

00:10:38.800 I guess that was based on COVID

00:10:40.160 and it was at least keeping some of the immigration down.

00:10:45.100 But as soon as that ends,

00:10:45.920 we're expecting hundreds of thousands,

00:10:49.080 if not millions of people to stream over the border.

00:10:52.000 I saw a number of people refer to it as an invasion

00:10:54.300 because there are more immigrants coming over the border

00:10:58.360 in the next year or so, or the last year,

00:11:01.660 compared to the entire invasion of Ukraine.

00:11:05.980 You know, the Russian army didn't put as many people into Ukraine

00:11:08.760 during a massive invasion

00:11:11.220 as we're letting into the country over the border on a regular basis.

00:11:15.600 So would you call that an invasion?

00:11:18.140 Do you think that's a, is that a fair word?

00:11:20.480 That there's an invasion going on?

00:11:24.360 I'm going to say no on that.

00:11:25.920 I'm going to say no on invasion.

00:11:28.480 And here's the difference.

00:11:31.120 Russia invaded Ukraine to take it over.

00:11:36.800 An actual invasion.

00:11:38.740 The people who are coming across the border 1.00

00:11:40.360 are trying to join our team.

00:11:43.680 That's the opposite of an invasion.

00:11:45.600 They're literally joining our team.

00:11:50.100 In one generation,

00:11:52.100 their children will be fighting in our military.

00:11:55.660 That is our military.

00:11:58.060 You're watching our military come across the border.

00:12:00.720 It's one generation away,

00:12:02.420 but they will be our military.

00:12:05.320 You know, some number of them

00:12:06.320 will just be our police force,

00:12:08.700 our military.

00:12:11.240 So,

00:12:12.760 now, can we all be adults

00:12:15.520 enough to agree

00:12:16.580 that no generalization

00:12:18.500 applies to all the people?

00:12:20.020 Can we be adult enough?

00:12:22.340 Can we say that there must be

00:12:23.840 some criminals?

00:12:24.900 There has to be some MS-13 people.

00:12:27.800 There has to be.

00:12:29.020 Can we say that

00:12:30.080 they're all coming for different reasons?

00:12:31.860 That's not all one reason.

00:12:33.440 Can we say that

00:12:34.240 some number of them

00:12:34.940 will be some of the best citizens

00:12:36.420 we've ever had,

00:12:37.800 while some other number of them

00:12:39.140 will end up in jail

00:12:40.300 and hurt people?

00:12:41.440 We can say that, right?

00:12:43.200 It's a mix of people.

00:12:44.820 So there's going to be

00:12:45.560 some good, some bad,

00:12:46.800 but I don't like the invasion word.

00:12:49.700 I do like

00:12:51.060 a word that's got some danger built in,

00:12:54.340 because there is some danger.

00:12:55.900 I do like a word

00:12:57.140 that shows

00:12:58.600 it's a big deal,

00:12:59.980 because it's a really big deal,

00:13:02.480 and it's not all good,

00:13:04.380 that's for sure.

00:13:04.980 So, yeah,

00:13:07.360 I just don't see invasion

00:13:08.660 as our best word for this,

00:13:11.720 because it feels a little racist-y.

00:13:16.600 Even though I know

00:13:17.320 that's not really the central theme,

00:13:20.740 it does have that problem,

00:13:22.520 because it's a little too hyperbolic to me.

00:13:26.120 But I don't know of a better word.

00:13:28.360 Replacement.

00:13:29.460 No, I don't think it's replacement.

00:13:32.020 Yeah, incursion, invasion.

00:13:35.500 Yeah.

00:13:37.520 You know,

00:13:38.060 it's almost like

00:13:38.820 too much of a good thing.

00:13:41.540 You know,

00:13:42.280 if you wanted to argue,

00:13:43.200 if you wanted to argue

00:13:44.360 against Democrats,

00:13:46.200 who are willing to say

00:13:48.360 that immigration is a good thing,

00:13:50.440 and most of us would agree

00:13:51.500 at some level it's a good thing,

00:13:53.060 and at some kind of control

00:13:55.540 it's a good thing.

00:13:57.300 But I feel like maybe,

00:13:59.140 I'm just noodling here,

00:14:00.080 I'm just thinking out loud.

00:14:01.400 If you were going to argue

00:14:02.400 with somebody who is,

00:14:04.200 let's say,

00:14:04.840 more pro-open borders than you,

00:14:08.360 I would think

00:14:09.180 the strongest argument

00:14:10.200 would say this.

00:14:12.680 Immigration is good,

00:14:14.140 but too much of a good thing

00:14:15.460 is bad.

00:14:17.500 And we're at the

00:14:18.920 too much of a good thing,

00:14:21.060 bad stage.

00:14:23.700 That puts more of a positive spin on it.

00:14:26.800 It's like ice cream.

00:14:28.320 Ice cream's fine

00:14:29.200 if you just have it once in a while.

00:14:30.560 If you eat two tubs of it a night,

00:14:34.540 way too much.

00:14:35.780 It's too much.

00:14:37.700 So, I don't know.

00:14:38.640 I don't like the words

00:14:39.520 we're using on this,

00:14:40.460 because sometimes the words

00:14:41.740 end up driving your policy.

00:14:44.460 So if your word

00:14:45.240 is a little imprecise,

00:14:47.080 you might end up with a policy

00:14:48.580 that's a little imprecise.

00:14:50.120 And I feel like

00:14:50.840 we've got to get this right.

00:14:52.640 With my framing,

00:14:54.180 my framing is,

00:14:55.020 immigration's good,

00:14:55.880 but too much of a good thing

00:14:57.880 is bad, right?

00:14:59.140 You can die from

00:14:59.900 drinking too much water.

00:15:01.560 Did you know that?

00:15:03.220 Literally,

00:15:03.780 if you drink too much water,

00:15:05.580 you can die. 0.82

00:15:06.660 There's an economist

00:15:07.360 who just tell us

00:15:08.760 how many people to let in

00:15:09.900 and how many to die.

00:15:12.720 And then we follow that

00:15:14.160 until things change,

00:15:15.780 and then we adjust it.

00:15:17.320 So I'm amazed

00:15:18.340 that somebody like Vivek

00:15:20.000 hasn't suggested that.

00:15:23.120 Doesn't that mean like

00:15:23.920 an obvious thing

00:15:25.560 that somebody like him

00:15:26.480 would come up with?

00:15:28.960 Am I wrong?

00:15:30.640 Because it's the high ground,

00:15:32.920 the high ground play

00:15:34.460 is that none of us citizens

00:15:37.620 know the right number.

00:15:39.360 That's the high ground.

00:15:40.540 I don't know the right number.

00:15:42.340 I think there's some number

00:15:43.440 of immigration that's good,

00:15:45.220 and then beyond that,

00:15:46.200 it's bad.

00:15:46.980 But I don't know

00:15:47.540 what that number is.

00:15:48.360 I'd rather experts

00:15:49.660 kind of massage it

00:15:52.060 and play with it

00:15:52.760 and adjust it

00:15:53.580 and see if they can come up

00:15:56.200 with something over time.

00:15:57.600 On day one,

00:15:58.320 maybe it's a bad guess.

00:16:00.180 But maybe over time

00:16:01.220 we figure it out,

00:16:02.380 how to manage that doorway

00:16:04.900 a little better.

00:16:07.400 Anyway,

00:16:07.980 I think this whole

00:16:08.880 immigration thing

00:16:09.740 could be turned

00:16:10.280 into a positive

00:16:11.040 if we frame it as

00:16:13.420 immigration is good,

00:16:14.800 but too much of a good thing

00:16:16.180 could kill you. 0.53

00:16:17.200 So we need a group of people,

00:16:21.220 experts, economists,

00:16:22.260 to tell us how many employees

00:16:24.840 we need that we're short of.

00:16:28.000 Too far?

00:16:29.660 Somebody says too far.

00:16:32.160 Yeah, that's going to be

00:16:33.020 my rallying cry

00:16:34.060 for stuff that's too far.

00:16:36.540 It's just too far.

00:16:38.200 All right.

00:16:39.380 Let's talk about Putin.

00:16:40.880 So I saw an interesting,

00:16:43.560 let's say,

00:16:45.840 hypothesis,

00:16:46.840 might have been on

00:16:47.600 one of the news shows,

00:16:49.080 CNN maybe,

00:16:50.100 where there was somebody

00:16:51.420 suggesting that

00:16:52.600 the battle between

00:16:54.980 Purgosian

00:16:55.800 and the

00:16:56.880 Ministry of Defense,

00:16:58.660 where Purgosian

00:16:59.540 was saying

00:17:00.220 the Wagner Group

00:17:00.940 is going to

00:17:01.760 pull out,

00:17:02.500 we're going to pull out

00:17:03.300 if we don't get more ammo,

00:17:05.100 because the Ministry of Defense

00:17:06.260 is hogging it.

00:17:07.120 And apparently

00:17:08.660 he's changed his mind,

00:17:09.780 because he's promised

00:17:10.660 more ammo.

00:17:13.380 So who knows

00:17:14.380 if that's over.

00:17:15.520 But maybe,

00:17:16.240 so maybe it was nothing

00:17:17.280 but good negotiating.

00:17:19.960 And the Wagner guy

00:17:21.280 knew he was indispensable

00:17:22.560 at the moment,

00:17:23.760 so he could negotiate hard.

00:17:26.440 That's probably what

00:17:27.520 made him

00:17:28.300 an important person

00:17:29.880 over there,

00:17:30.380 is that he negotiates hard.

00:17:32.180 So maybe it was just that.

00:17:33.640 He was just negotiating

00:17:34.480 to get more ammo.

00:17:35.200 But others are suggesting

00:17:38.100 that Putin

00:17:40.360 is letting his

00:17:41.920 oligarchs and generals

00:17:43.640 fight it out,

00:17:45.300 so that he becomes

00:17:46.600 sort of away from the fray.

00:17:48.900 So he'll let the,

00:17:49.860 you know,

00:17:50.460 the underlings

00:17:51.720 battle it out

00:17:53.320 a little bit in public,

00:17:54.880 and just sees

00:17:56.740 where it ends up.

00:17:58.120 That doesn't feel right to me.

00:18:00.720 Does that sound like

00:18:01.780 a real thing

00:18:02.500 that Putin would be doing?

00:18:04.000 We can't read his mind.

00:18:05.200 Right?

00:18:05.920 Can't read his mind.

00:18:06.940 But it doesn't feel

00:18:08.220 like something he would do.

00:18:10.180 Because he has the power

00:18:11.380 to tell them to shut up.

00:18:13.820 If you have the power

00:18:14.920 to tell people to shut up,

00:18:17.220 and if they don't shut up, 0.67

00:18:18.900 it makes your country

00:18:19.680 look like it's in conflict,

00:18:21.520 I don't understand

00:18:23.280 letting them do it.

00:18:25.640 It only makes sense

00:18:26.860 if he couldn't stop them.

00:18:29.580 Would you agree?

00:18:31.360 It makes far more sense

00:18:32.860 that they're doing it

00:18:33.680 despite Putin

00:18:34.700 not liking it.

00:18:36.400 Like,

00:18:36.720 there's something

00:18:37.200 deeper than that.

00:18:38.380 I'm not buying the

00:18:39.480 Putin likes his people 0.91

00:18:40.900 to fight in public.

00:18:42.220 That doesn't feel real.

00:18:44.580 But I'll put it out there.

00:18:46.180 Somebody said it.

00:18:47.640 All right.

00:18:49.180 Then there's another oligarch

00:18:50.700 who made some news

00:18:51.760 very directly

00:18:53.120 criticizing the war.

00:18:54.980 Right?

00:18:55.120 He wasn't pulling any punches.

00:18:58.040 Just bad war,

00:18:59.120 bad decision.

00:19:00.620 You know,

00:19:00.800 we shouldn't be there.

00:19:02.280 So,

00:19:03.500 is that oligarch

00:19:04.960 going to disappear?

00:19:06.520 Or is there,

00:19:07.320 like,

00:19:07.620 a beginning of a crack

00:19:09.060 in the unity?

00:19:12.020 I think it's too soon.

00:19:14.600 Too soon to know

00:19:15.800 if there's any kind

00:19:16.480 of an oligarch

00:19:17.980 trend happening.

00:19:19.440 But one thing

00:19:20.340 that does seem clear

00:19:21.240 is that the oligarchs

00:19:22.720 are seeing it's not

00:19:23.420 working in their favor.

00:19:25.120 I don't believe

00:19:26.160 there are too many oligarchs

00:19:27.360 who are saying,

00:19:28.420 ooh,

00:19:28.740 I can't wait

00:19:29.260 until we capture

00:19:30.040 those regions

00:19:32.220 within Ukraine

00:19:33.500 because I'm going

00:19:34.680 to make some money then.

00:19:36.120 I think the oligarchs

00:19:37.460 see it as all bad.

00:19:39.120 Meaning they already

00:19:40.120 have a good situation.

00:19:41.560 They're oligarchs.

00:19:43.020 The only thing

00:19:43.680 they need to continue

00:19:44.560 being happy

00:19:45.160 is for Russia's economy

00:19:47.220 and standing in the world

00:19:48.540 to not degrade

00:19:50.560 because they'd like

00:19:51.600 to travel.

00:19:52.800 Imagine being this,

00:19:53.740 like,

00:19:54.180 richest guy in the world

00:19:55.100 one of the oligarchs.

00:19:58.080 You're a Russian 1.00

00:19:58.800 with just billions

00:19:59.600 and billions of dollars.

00:20:00.780 The world is your

00:20:01.680 playground.

00:20:03.760 And then you're not

00:20:04.720 allowed to leave Russia.

00:20:07.520 That would really suck

00:20:08.980 for an oligarch.

00:20:10.580 They've got their

00:20:11.040 private planes,

00:20:12.060 they want to go places.

00:20:13.640 Get out of Russia. 0.97

00:20:15.180 So,

00:20:15.940 I think there might be

00:20:17.880 more oligarch pressure

00:20:19.520 on Putin than we can see

00:20:22.860 from the outside.

00:20:24.320 I would think the oligarchs

00:20:25.680 would be solidly

00:20:27.140 against the war

00:20:28.020 by now.

00:20:29.220 What do you think?

00:20:31.140 Of course,

00:20:31.900 there'll be exceptions.

00:20:33.000 But wouldn't you say

00:20:33.700 that mostly the oligarchs 0.75

00:20:35.120 would be against the war

00:20:36.380 at this point

00:20:36.960 and would rather

00:20:37.540 just wind it down

00:20:38.440 no matter what happens?

00:20:40.600 These special operations,

00:20:41.980 I should say,

00:20:42.520 not a war.

00:20:43.180 Not if they're profiting.

00:20:47.980 Well,

00:20:48.280 I suspect most of the oligarchs

00:20:50.260 are losing money

00:20:51.000 and not profiting.

00:20:52.280 Because the oligarchs

00:20:53.380 are being named by name.

00:20:55.440 Right?

00:20:55.860 And some of their assets

00:20:56.760 are being frozen

00:20:57.520 and they can't get chips

00:20:59.400 to make stuff.

00:21:01.620 I don't know.

00:21:02.940 So I think maybe

00:21:03.720 that's the game

00:21:05.060 within the game

00:21:05.720 is the oligarchs

00:21:06.640 trying to work Putin

00:21:08.860 to end it.

00:21:11.880 Well,

00:21:12.360 Washington Post

00:21:13.920 is blaming

00:21:16.900 I don't know

00:21:19.480 what's true here.

00:21:21.260 So I've told you

00:21:22.220 before that

00:21:22.900 I'm going to

00:21:23.620 intentionally ignore

00:21:25.020 the mass shootings.

00:21:27.840 And I ignore them

00:21:28.920 so hard

00:21:29.340 I can't even tell

00:21:30.040 which one we're

00:21:30.600 talking about anymore.

00:21:32.220 I'll look at the news

00:21:33.220 and it'll be

00:21:33.600 blah, blah,

00:21:34.320 mass shooting.

00:21:35.600 And I can't tell

00:21:36.580 if it's a new one

00:21:37.720 or the one

00:21:38.660 that just happened

00:21:39.400 or it's the one

00:21:40.280 before the one before.

00:21:42.360 I don't know.

00:21:42.680 I just know

00:21:43.060 there's lots of

00:21:43.580 mass shootings.

00:21:45.700 And there will be

00:21:46.520 a lot more.

00:21:48.320 I think I've told you

00:21:49.520 this before.

00:21:50.720 Every signal

00:21:51.700 in society

00:21:52.620 is sending the message

00:21:54.040 oh, there's going to be

00:21:55.200 a lot more mass shootings.

00:21:56.980 A lot more.

00:21:58.380 Because the

00:21:59.040 things that cause it

00:22:00.700 are young men

00:22:01.760 who don't have

00:22:02.520 a better direction.

00:22:04.900 And we have

00:22:05.580 the highest number

00:22:06.440 of young men

00:22:07.140 without a good direction

00:22:08.200 of all time.

00:22:08.860 Then you've got

00:22:09.980 your mental illness 0.70

00:22:10.840 seems to be

00:22:11.680 at an all time high.

00:22:13.080 You've got your

00:22:13.640 drug use

00:22:14.360 seems to be

00:22:15.140 at an all time high.

00:22:16.660 And then you've got

00:22:17.520 your media

00:22:18.600 getting people

00:22:19.260 all worked up.

00:22:21.020 Social media too

00:22:22.040 seems to be

00:22:22.840 at an all time high.

00:22:24.400 And we have

00:22:25.340 fewer

00:22:26.420 positive paths

00:22:28.760 for young men.

00:22:30.620 So the young men

00:22:31.560 are not going out there

00:22:32.420 and just slaying it

00:22:33.420 with the young women

00:22:34.180 and starting families.

00:22:35.280 They just don't feel

00:22:35.980 they have options.

00:22:36.640 So if you have

00:22:38.440 that many young men

00:22:39.620 without direction

00:22:40.460 and you have

00:22:41.820 a country full

00:22:42.600 of easy access

00:22:43.460 to guns

00:22:44.060 there's only one

00:22:45.520 way this goes.

00:22:47.340 There's going to be

00:22:48.120 a whole lot more

00:22:49.160 mass shootings

00:22:50.020 and there's nothing

00:22:50.780 that you can do

00:22:51.320 about it.

00:22:53.100 I mean you can do

00:22:54.080 a good guy with a gun

00:22:55.340 you can do a little

00:22:56.100 stuff around the edges

00:22:57.020 but we have a

00:22:58.480 social situation

00:22:59.800 that guarantees it.

00:23:01.720 As long as the

00:23:02.800 basic social situation

00:23:04.180 exists

00:23:04.740 there's just

00:23:06.680 going to be

00:23:06.960 more of it.

00:23:08.100 I would just

00:23:08.720 stay away from

00:23:09.260 crowds

00:23:09.720 frankly.

00:23:11.460 That's my strategy.

00:23:14.560 Alright.

00:23:18.900 So let's get

00:23:19.940 here's an update

00:23:20.560 on Bud Light.

00:23:21.740 I've been fascinated

00:23:22.700 as much by how

00:23:23.820 the Anheuser-Busch

00:23:25.280 handles the crisis.

00:23:28.220 So we still don't know

00:23:29.440 if there's any

00:23:29.980 permanent damage

00:23:31.740 because the Bud Light

00:23:32.960 pushback to the

00:23:34.520 Dylan Mulvaney

00:23:35.300 as an influencer

00:23:36.820 situation.

00:23:38.300 And so the only

00:23:40.020 thing that was

00:23:40.820 affected was

00:23:41.660 one brand.

00:23:43.820 So Anheuser-Busch

00:23:44.640 actually had a

00:23:45.300 pretty good quarter

00:23:46.080 if you don't count

00:23:47.540 that Bud Light

00:23:48.200 went down 25%

00:23:49.380 because of this.

00:23:50.660 Now they don't know

00:23:51.380 if it'll stay down

00:23:52.120 25%.

00:23:53.140 I have a feeling

00:23:54.780 it will.

00:23:56.120 This one has a

00:23:57.760 feeling like it's

00:24:00.000 going to last

00:24:00.680 because everybody

00:24:01.800 heard of it

00:24:02.400 and everybody

00:24:03.400 has the same

00:24:03.920 feeling later.

00:24:06.240 So people will

00:24:07.100 develop a new

00:24:07.700 habit and the

00:24:08.660 new habit

00:24:09.100 probably has

00:24:09.880 now excluded

00:24:11.040 Bud Light.

00:24:12.300 So that's a big

00:24:13.300 deal.

00:24:14.240 So what they did

00:24:14.860 was Anheuser-Busch

00:24:16.460 first of all

00:24:17.180 they reassigned

00:24:18.140 or got rid of

00:24:18.780 two executives

00:24:19.520 and that didn't

00:24:21.460 seem to be enough.

00:24:23.160 So now they're

00:24:23.840 blaming their

00:24:24.520 ad agency

00:24:25.820 but they're not

00:24:26.820 naming the ad

00:24:27.500 agency.

00:24:29.200 How would you

00:24:29.940 like to be the

00:24:30.740 ad agency

00:24:31.480 that recommended

00:24:32.860 that?

00:24:35.540 How would you

00:24:36.300 like to be the

00:24:36.900 one that

00:24:37.220 recommended?

00:24:37.740 How do you

00:24:38.260 ever get another

00:24:39.000 job?

00:24:40.540 Well what kind

00:24:41.420 of work did you

00:24:42.100 do before?

00:24:43.340 Well we were

00:24:45.440 behind the Bud

00:24:46.740 Light promotion.

00:24:49.560 It's a little

00:24:50.220 tough to market

00:24:50.860 yourself after

00:24:51.520 that.

00:24:52.940 But Anheuser-Busch

00:24:54.360 quite wisely is

00:24:55.700 trying to throw

00:24:56.520 the ad agency

00:24:57.260 under the bus

00:24:58.020 despite the fact

00:24:59.860 that anything

00:25:00.940 the ad agency

00:25:01.800 suggested was

00:25:03.640 approved by

00:25:04.840 an Anheuser-Busch

00:25:08.040 executive.

00:25:09.700 I'm not sure

00:25:10.860 that blaming

00:25:11.480 the ad agency

00:25:12.500 is on point

00:25:15.020 because ad

00:25:16.260 agencies are

00:25:17.000 supposed to give

00:25:17.500 you a few

00:25:17.940 different looks

00:25:18.680 right?

00:25:19.700 They don't give

00:25:20.300 you one idea

00:25:21.240 do they?

00:25:23.220 Don't they give

00:25:23.780 you a whole variety

00:25:24.600 of ideas and then

00:25:25.500 you as the

00:25:25.980 executive pick the

00:25:26.900 good one?

00:25:28.060 So I feel it's

00:25:29.200 a little bit

00:25:30.860 unfair to blame

00:25:32.620 the ad agency.

00:25:33.840 A little bit

00:25:34.420 unfair.

00:25:36.580 But I'd have to

00:25:37.480 know how hard

00:25:38.040 they pushed.

00:25:39.580 If they really

00:25:40.480 pushed this

00:25:41.360 you know the

00:25:42.220 Dylan Mulvaney

00:25:42.920 thing and

00:25:44.020 then you know

00:25:45.540 Anheuser-Busch

00:25:46.240 executive agreed

00:25:48.360 to it that's

00:25:49.900 still two people

00:25:50.660 making a mistake

00:25:51.460 but you can see

00:25:52.660 why the ad agency

00:25:53.480 would be a little

00:25:54.740 more guilty if

00:25:55.980 they pushed it

00:25:56.580 hard.

00:25:57.360 But we don't

00:25:57.760 know that.

00:25:58.700 We don't know

00:25:59.120 if they pushed

00:25:59.560 it hard or

00:26:00.100 it's just one

00:26:00.540 of the things

00:26:00.940 they suggested

00:26:01.560 in a list of

00:26:02.740 lots of things.

00:26:06.480 Alright.

00:26:10.940 Here's an

00:26:11.460 interesting story

00:26:12.480 that I wasn't

00:26:13.020 aware of.

00:26:13.920 Are you all

00:26:14.420 aware of RFK

00:26:15.500 Jr.'s past

00:26:17.640 wildlife which

00:26:19.440 apparently includes

00:26:20.420 lots of

00:26:20.900 womanizing while 1.00

00:26:22.820 previously married

00:26:23.880 and a whole

00:26:25.340 bunch of

00:26:25.660 drugs.

00:26:27.900 So at one

00:26:28.600 point he did

00:26:29.120 heroin

00:26:29.500 and you know

00:26:31.860 psychedelics and

00:26:33.840 marijuana

00:26:34.400 probably assumed

00:26:35.920 drinking.

00:26:37.540 And the story

00:26:38.740 is that he is

00:26:39.520 now off of

00:26:41.100 everything right.

00:26:42.980 So at the

00:26:43.900 moment I would

00:26:44.520 assume he's not

00:26:45.120 drinking either

00:26:45.820 because if you're

00:26:46.340 an addict you

00:26:46.880 can't drink.

00:26:49.660 Allegedly.

00:26:50.140 Now I have

00:26:52.600 mixed feelings

00:26:53.320 about this.

00:26:54.400 I have mixed

00:26:54.700 feelings.

00:26:55.520 As you know

00:26:56.200 my single issue

00:26:58.220 this time is

00:26:58.920 going to be

00:26:59.220 fentanyl and

00:27:00.700 I'm not sure

00:27:01.400 that that's bad

00:27:02.460 to have an

00:27:03.800 ex-addict who

00:27:05.780 would be in

00:27:06.240 charge of the

00:27:06.920 policies about

00:27:08.580 fentanyl.

00:27:09.820 Is that good

00:27:10.500 or bad?

00:27:12.180 See I trust

00:27:13.560 that he won't

00:27:14.360 be abusing

00:27:15.860 substances if he

00:27:17.060 were president

00:27:17.580 because the

00:27:18.700 president gets

00:27:19.240 watched pretty

00:27:19.820 closely.

00:27:20.460 So I would

00:27:21.540 guess that you

00:27:22.800 know you could

00:27:23.200 expect him to

00:27:24.260 be clean in

00:27:24.920 office.

00:27:29.900 But would you

00:27:32.240 rather have

00:27:32.740 somebody who

00:27:33.260 really understands

00:27:34.420 addiction working

00:27:36.180 on addiction or

00:27:37.460 somebody who's

00:27:38.000 never had a

00:27:38.540 drink?

00:27:40.840 I feel like

00:27:42.020 his experience

00:27:44.160 might have an

00:27:44.900 advantage.

00:27:46.540 Because the

00:27:47.760 part that we

00:27:48.320 always overlook

00:27:49.340 look, I like

00:27:51.000 to say we

00:27:51.720 should go hard

00:27:52.240 against the

00:27:52.720 cartels.

00:27:53.860 But I also

00:27:55.980 know it's not

00:27:56.520 enough.

00:27:57.980 You could take

00:27:58.640 out the cartels

00:27:59.440 tomorrow and

00:28:00.060 it would be

00:28:00.300 replaced with

00:28:00.900 some other

00:28:01.300 criminal element.

00:28:02.700 So people are

00:28:03.440 still going to

00:28:03.860 get their

00:28:04.140 fentanyl.

00:28:06.120 Which is not a

00:28:07.060 reason to not

00:28:08.360 attack the

00:28:08.900 cartels because

00:28:10.120 they are sending

00:28:10.680 death into our

00:28:11.380 country.

00:28:11.780 So you do

00:28:12.740 need to take

00:28:13.860 care of business.

00:28:15.460 But maybe you

00:28:16.900 need somebody who

00:28:17.620 has been there

00:28:18.300 and felt it and

00:28:19.720 knows how strong

00:28:21.060 it is to suggest

00:28:22.940 a workaround.

00:28:23.940 Now my workaround

00:28:24.840 is the only one

00:28:25.880 that I think can

00:28:26.480 work, which is to

00:28:27.920 build cities from

00:28:29.800 scratch that just

00:28:31.520 don't have any

00:28:32.300 access in or out

00:28:33.440 for any drugs.

00:28:35.440 Now it might still

00:28:36.340 get shipped in,

00:28:37.160 but as soon as

00:28:37.680 somebody within that

00:28:38.500 city tests positive

00:28:40.700 for drugs, you move

00:28:41.620 them out of the

00:28:42.160 city.

00:28:42.400 You have to

00:28:44.240 expel them from 1.00

00:28:44.960 the city the

00:28:45.580 moment there's a

00:28:46.280 drug there.

00:28:47.500 There could be

00:28:47.860 no, you know,

00:28:49.260 that can't be

00:28:49.740 negotiable.

00:28:50.880 But yeah, you

00:28:51.360 need some kind of

00:28:51.960 a gated city where

00:28:53.080 you can just put

00:28:53.680 all of the people

00:28:54.460 who have the same

00:28:54.940 problem, but that

00:28:56.380 they can live a

00:28:57.320 quality life while

00:28:59.720 they're there, and

00:29:01.040 then anytime they

00:29:01.740 want to leave, or

00:29:03.580 let's say, you

00:29:04.320 know, maybe there's

00:29:05.220 a period where they

00:29:05.900 have to be there

00:29:06.540 for a month or

00:29:07.120 something, depending

00:29:08.120 if there was a

00:29:08.780 crime involved.

00:29:09.520 But they should

00:29:12.300 have a way out,

00:29:13.740 right?

00:29:14.060 They should be

00:29:14.560 able to get dry

00:29:15.280 for X amount of

00:29:16.440 weeks, and that

00:29:17.760 should be enough

00:29:18.260 for them to get

00:29:18.760 out if they want

00:29:19.400 to.

00:29:20.220 So I wouldn't

00:29:20.900 call it a prison

00:29:21.580 city, because you

00:29:22.600 could build the

00:29:24.060 city at a higher

00:29:25.800 lifestyle than

00:29:26.560 they're experiencing

00:29:27.520 right now.

00:29:29.120 You know, it could

00:29:29.620 be a good lifestyle

00:29:30.480 if you build it

00:29:31.040 from scratch.

00:29:33.340 Yeah, let's call

00:29:34.080 it a recovery

00:29:34.640 city.

00:29:36.520 I like that,

00:29:37.380 recovery city.

00:29:38.180 That's not bad.

00:29:42.080 Yeah, it wouldn't

00:29:42.780 be a gulag, because

00:29:43.880 it would be only

00:29:45.600 mandatory for a

00:29:47.160 small number of

00:29:47.820 people who had

00:29:49.220 perhaps, you

00:29:50.880 know, violated an

00:29:51.800 actual crime.

00:29:54.480 Detoxity.

00:29:55.460 Oh, that's not

00:29:56.000 bad.

00:29:57.220 Detoxity.

00:29:59.180 Ah, I like it.

00:30:02.420 Rehabopolis.

00:30:06.460 New Oakland.

00:30:07.300 New Oakland.

00:30:09.460 That's funny.

00:30:11.100 All right, well,

00:30:11.580 Matt Walsh is trying

00:30:13.100 to get into extra

00:30:13.980 trouble, because I

00:30:15.240 guess he didn't get

00:30:15.860 into enough trouble

00:30:16.820 with his opinions on

00:30:18.280 the trans community.

00:30:20.240 So now he's got an

00:30:21.680 opinion piece about

00:30:22.780 why there's one word

00:30:25.460 that people are not

00:30:28.380 allowed to use,

00:30:29.620 unless they're black,

00:30:30.900 which would be the

00:30:31.620 N-word.

00:30:32.000 word, and he

00:30:33.420 argues, you know,

00:30:36.120 why is it that it's

00:30:37.260 insane that there's

00:30:38.020 one word that you

00:30:38.780 can't use in any

00:30:39.640 context?

00:30:40.520 Now, he's not

00:30:41.120 arguing, he's not

00:30:42.800 arguing using the

00:30:44.500 word in casual

00:30:45.320 conversation.

00:30:46.520 He's just saying that

00:30:47.540 is there no situation

00:30:49.480 where you could talk

00:30:50.380 about the word?

00:30:52.660 You can't even say

00:30:53.860 somebody used this

00:30:55.180 word.

00:30:55.940 You have to say N-word,

00:30:57.120 and as he points

00:30:58.100 out, N-word means

00:30:59.520 exactly the same.

00:31:01.640 So it's weird, and

00:31:02.380 you think the other

00:31:03.140 word as soon as you

00:31:03.820 hear N-word.

00:31:04.680 So it's just sort of

00:31:06.040 a crazy, insane

00:31:07.300 situation.

00:31:09.120 Here's my opinion.

00:31:11.720 It's just one word.

00:31:14.180 It's just one word.

00:31:16.520 I don't know that

00:31:17.500 that's like the

00:31:18.600 beginning of some

00:31:19.320 slippery slope,

00:31:20.900 because, you know,

00:31:22.140 it's been decades

00:31:23.280 when that word was,

00:31:24.760 you know, not right

00:31:26.180 for polite company,

00:31:27.600 but I don't think

00:31:28.920 things were slipping

00:31:29.720 because of that

00:31:30.480 one word, right?

00:31:32.980 I also say that

00:31:34.280 there are some

00:31:35.760 things which you

00:31:36.500 should not

00:31:37.040 analogize to.

00:31:40.500 For example,

00:31:41.560 the Holocaust. 0.58

00:31:43.140 It wasn't anything

00:31:43.940 quite like it,

00:31:45.320 or slavery in

00:31:46.340 America.

00:31:47.380 Nothing really

00:31:48.100 was like that,

00:31:49.760 or whatever

00:31:52.240 the settlers did

00:31:53.880 to the Native

00:31:54.580 Americans.

00:31:56.180 It wasn't anything

00:31:56.900 exactly like that,

00:31:58.380 so it's hard to

00:31:59.100 compare anything to

00:31:59.760 it.

00:32:00.160 So this word is

00:32:01.240 the same.

00:32:02.500 There's nothing

00:32:03.160 like that word,

00:32:04.680 because there's

00:32:05.140 nothing like

00:32:05.760 American slavery,

00:32:06.920 at least in the

00:32:07.500 American experience.

00:32:09.820 So I don't mind

00:32:11.300 if somebody has a

00:32:12.260 word that is

00:32:13.940 out of bounds.

00:32:15.100 Just one word.

00:32:17.020 No big deal to me.

00:32:18.300 I do think that

00:32:22.540 you shouldn't go to

00:32:23.220 jail and get

00:32:23.760 canceled if you

00:32:24.660 use it in the

00:32:25.400 context of talking

00:32:26.340 about it.

00:32:29.200 Now, as

00:32:30.780 somebody would

00:32:31.220 say, white

00:32:33.200 people can be

00:32:33.860 called crackers,

00:32:35.340 and usually we

00:32:36.160 just laugh at it.

00:32:37.520 I do.

00:32:38.320 I laugh every time

00:32:39.320 I hear somebody

00:32:39.800 call me a

00:32:40.280 cracker.

00:32:41.280 I don't know if

00:32:41.840 it's because the

00:32:42.540 word is funny.

00:32:43.460 Now, I would

00:32:47.020 argue that the

00:32:48.260 people who are

00:32:48.780 not bothered by

00:32:49.580 words have an

00:32:50.500 advantage over

00:32:51.680 people who are.

00:32:53.940 If you were to

00:32:55.160 check back in a

00:32:56.080 few years, the

00:32:56.740 people who are

00:32:57.220 not bothered by

00:32:58.000 words probably do

00:32:58.840 better than the

00:33:00.200 people who are

00:33:00.720 out of bounds

00:33:01.180 in words, because

00:33:02.140 that would be the

00:33:02.620 least important

00:33:03.160 thing you could

00:33:03.620 do.

00:33:04.920 But, hey, I

00:33:06.760 also like people

00:33:07.380 to feel comfortable.

00:33:09.440 And, you know,

00:33:10.100 there's a reason I

00:33:11.380 don't use the C

00:33:12.180 word.

00:33:13.460 In mixed

00:33:14.900 company where I

00:33:15.620 don't know

00:33:15.940 everybody, I

00:33:18.160 would definitely

00:33:18.560 use it privately.

00:33:19.640 But I wouldn't

00:33:20.320 use it in mixed

00:33:21.700 company if I

00:33:22.400 didn't know the

00:33:22.920 crowd, right?

00:33:24.520 So it's not a

00:33:25.440 big deal to, you

00:33:27.200 know, censor

00:33:27.780 yourself if

00:33:29.600 something is,

00:33:31.100 somebody says

00:33:31.860 cracker is a

00:33:32.620 horrible insult.

00:33:34.200 How many of you

00:33:34.960 are white people

00:33:36.120 who would be

00:33:36.540 insulted by the

00:33:37.420 word cracker?

00:33:41.360 Anybody?

00:33:43.460 To me, it's one

00:33:44.880 of the funniest

00:33:45.360 words.

00:33:46.880 It just sounds

00:33:47.680 funny.

00:33:48.620 Cracker.

00:33:51.440 No, none of

00:33:52.280 you are offended,

00:33:53.220 right?

00:33:54.320 I don't think so.

00:33:56.900 Anyway, I'm

00:33:58.540 going to say that

00:33:59.240 I completely see

00:34:00.680 Matt Walsh's

00:34:01.440 point, but I

00:34:03.040 don't think it's

00:34:03.520 important.

00:34:05.220 It's just the

00:34:05.980 least important

00:34:06.560 thing to talk

00:34:07.140 about.

00:34:07.360 I wouldn't

00:34:09.380 personally use

00:34:09.980 the word because

00:34:10.900 I find it, to

00:34:12.740 me, it's one of

00:34:13.280 the very few

00:34:13.920 words where you

00:34:16.400 can actually, it

00:34:17.360 makes your body

00:34:18.040 feel bad.

00:34:18.780 I talked about

00:34:19.360 writing humor.

00:34:20.820 When you write

00:34:21.340 humor, you use

00:34:22.180 your body to

00:34:23.840 judge whether

00:34:24.460 something worked.

00:34:26.000 Like if you

00:34:26.560 laugh, oh, your

00:34:27.440 body did that.

00:34:28.580 You didn't decide

00:34:29.320 to laugh, you

00:34:29.880 just laughed.

00:34:30.740 Your body

00:34:31.220 actually reacted.

00:34:32.380 So that's how I

00:34:33.060 judge my writing,

00:34:34.280 is by my body.

00:34:35.380 But that word,

00:34:36.700 the n-word, even

00:34:39.880 the thought of

00:34:41.000 the word, gives

00:34:42.900 me a bad body

00:34:43.840 feel.

00:34:44.980 Does anybody

00:34:45.420 else get that?

00:34:46.800 It might be a

00:34:47.400 writer thing.

00:34:48.380 Because the word

00:34:49.080 itself has an

00:34:50.180 ugliness to it

00:34:51.260 that does

00:34:52.500 transcend almost

00:34:55.380 any word I can

00:34:56.080 think of.

00:34:58.560 The other word

00:34:59.800 that has that

00:35:00.460 quality to it is

00:35:01.700 rape.

00:35:04.020 I don't like to

00:35:05.060 use the r-word

00:35:05.880 because there's

00:35:08.300 a physical

00:35:08.860 feeling to it

00:35:09.660 that's just

00:35:10.320 really negative.

00:35:11.880 Like you can

00:35:12.620 just feel the

00:35:13.300 weight of the

00:35:13.780 word.

00:35:14.800 So the n-word

00:35:15.400 does that to

00:35:15.960 me.

00:35:16.120 There's like a

00:35:16.740 disgust, just

00:35:18.460 like a natural

00:35:19.180 physical disgust

00:35:20.740 when I even

00:35:21.560 think of it.

00:35:22.780 Now, I don't

00:35:23.340 get that disgust

00:35:24.600 when black people

00:35:25.880 are using it,

00:35:26.540 right?

00:35:27.080 But I think of

00:35:27.960 it just as a

00:35:28.640 word.

00:35:29.120 It's just like

00:35:29.620 an ugly word.

00:35:32.020 And there are

00:35:32.580 other ones like

00:35:33.120 that.

00:35:36.260 Paul Graham.

00:35:40.340 So Paul

00:35:41.040 Graham, famous

00:35:42.060 investor type,

00:35:43.520 very good

00:35:44.100 follow, says

00:35:44.960 lots of wise

00:35:45.560 things.

00:35:46.540 I would put

00:35:47.240 him in the

00:35:47.760 internet dad

00:35:48.540 category of

00:35:50.000 people who

00:35:50.400 are just

00:35:50.720 trying to

00:35:52.040 make sure

00:35:52.400 that we

00:35:52.680 don't get

00:35:53.020 too crazy.

00:35:55.660 And he

00:35:56.540 tweeted this

00:35:57.320 provocatively.

00:35:58.920 he said that

00:36:00.580 men commit

00:36:01.160 95% of

00:36:02.140 homicides.

00:36:03.060 I don't

00:36:03.800 consider it a

00:36:04.480 slander if

00:36:05.180 someone says

00:36:05.720 men are

00:36:06.280 inherently more

00:36:07.120 violent.

00:36:08.020 It seems

00:36:08.480 obviously true.

00:36:10.060 Now, when I

00:36:10.780 read that, I

00:36:11.320 said to myself

00:36:11.980 two things.

00:36:13.060 Number one,

00:36:13.760 okay, that is

00:36:15.120 100% obviously

00:36:16.500 true, that men

00:36:17.840 are doing most

00:36:18.880 of the homicides,

00:36:20.140 and that everybody

00:36:21.320 can see it, and

00:36:22.700 it shouldn't be

00:36:23.460 like a big

00:36:25.020 problem if you

00:36:25.900 point it out.

00:36:26.440 Well, what do

00:36:28.380 you think people

00:36:28.920 said?

00:36:30.200 They had a big

00:36:30.880 problem with it.

00:36:33.120 I can't think of

00:36:34.140 anything that

00:36:34.780 would be more

00:36:35.400 obvious and

00:36:38.400 true, that men

00:36:39.940 are the ones

00:36:40.400 creating most of

00:36:41.240 the murders.

00:36:43.000 And yet, there

00:36:43.940 was pushback.

00:36:45.460 There was

00:36:45.800 pushback.

00:36:47.320 Now, here's

00:36:49.880 what you're

00:36:50.260 wondering.

00:36:52.220 Is this the

00:36:53.160 first sort of

00:36:55.080 the platform

00:36:55.840 tweet that's

00:36:58.340 making you ask

00:36:59.200 the question

00:36:59.800 about crime

00:37:02.560 differences by

00:37:03.360 ethnicity?

00:37:05.100 Now, if he

00:37:05.860 can say that

00:37:06.560 men are

00:37:07.080 obviously more

00:37:08.740 murderous than

00:37:09.480 women, how 1.00

00:37:12.200 close is that

00:37:12.940 to saying,

00:37:13.480 well, and

00:37:14.040 there's this

00:37:14.540 ethnic group

00:37:15.260 that seems to

00:37:16.440 have a high

00:37:16.860 murder rate,

00:37:17.540 too?

00:37:19.360 Are we going

00:37:20.040 to say that

00:37:20.440 that's now

00:37:21.640 obvious and

00:37:22.380 everybody can

00:37:22.880 see it and

00:37:23.420 there's nothing

00:37:23.820 to talk about

00:37:24.520 here?

00:37:24.760 because it

00:37:25.620 doesn't work

00:37:26.140 that way.

00:37:28.240 He's in

00:37:28.880 dangerous

00:37:29.320 territory by

00:37:30.760 pointing out

00:37:31.260 the obvious,

00:37:32.540 which is men

00:37:33.420 kill more

00:37:33.900 people than

00:37:34.360 women. 0.81

00:37:35.520 But I feel

00:37:36.680 as though the

00:37:37.120 danger here is

00:37:38.440 that people are

00:37:38.980 going to read

00:37:39.420 his mind and

00:37:40.720 say, wait a

00:37:41.280 minute, you're 0.98

00:37:42.240 talking about

00:37:42.760 men and

00:37:43.120 women, but 1.00

00:37:44.500 are you really

00:37:45.380 trying to make

00:37:46.140 me think about

00:37:47.220 differences in

00:37:49.200 ethnic crime 1.00

00:37:50.340 rates?

00:37:50.680 I don't

00:37:51.840 know if

00:37:52.080 he is.

00:37:53.140 That would

00:37:53.680 seem a

00:37:54.040 little off

00:37:54.820 model or

00:37:55.960 out of

00:37:56.380 context, but

00:37:57.880 there's some

00:37:58.320 reason he

00:37:58.780 did it.

00:37:59.820 There's some

00:38:00.300 reason he

00:38:00.740 tweeted it.

00:38:01.140 I don't

00:38:01.340 know what it

00:38:01.660 is.

00:38:02.760 But I felt

00:38:03.920 like him

00:38:04.280 walking right

00:38:04.840 up to this

00:38:05.260 danger line

00:38:06.000 of cancellation

00:38:06.680 and didn't

00:38:08.640 quite get a

00:38:09.180 toe over the

00:38:09.680 line.

00:38:11.200 So good for

00:38:12.040 him.

00:38:13.060 I hope he

00:38:13.820 doesn't get

00:38:14.220 canceled.

00:38:15.620 But I would

00:38:16.280 like to add

00:38:16.660 this to the

00:38:17.340 cancellation

00:38:17.780 conversation.

00:38:19.980 I don't

00:38:20.760 believe anybody

00:38:22.100 gets canceled

00:38:22.820 for what

00:38:23.300 they've done

00:38:23.780 or what

00:38:24.180 they said.

00:38:26.140 Do you

00:38:26.740 believe that?

00:38:27.840 I believe

00:38:28.620 that nobody

00:38:29.240 gets canceled

00:38:30.240 for what

00:38:30.980 they said

00:38:31.560 or what

00:38:32.640 they did

00:38:33.200 or what

00:38:34.280 they thought.

00:38:35.920 Not me,

00:38:37.120 not anybody

00:38:37.740 else.

00:38:38.440 If you were

00:38:38.960 to tell the

00:38:39.600 story of my

00:38:40.200 cancellation,

00:38:40.880 you'd say,

00:38:41.780 you said

00:38:42.400 X and then

00:38:43.780 they canceled

00:38:44.240 you because

00:38:44.720 you said

00:38:45.100 the thing.

00:38:46.120 Do you

00:38:46.360 think that

00:38:46.700 happened?

00:38:47.780 Do you

00:38:48.300 think I

00:38:48.600 got canceled

00:38:49.060 because somebody

00:38:50.080 cared about

00:38:50.580 my opinion?

00:38:52.520 How many

00:38:53.160 people do

00:38:53.560 you think

00:38:53.780 care about

00:38:54.140 my opinion?

00:38:56.620 Nobody.

00:38:58.120 Nobody.

00:38:59.220 Does anybody

00:38:59.920 care that I

00:39:00.560 said a thing

00:39:01.100 that they

00:39:01.460 wouldn't have

00:39:01.820 said?

00:39:03.780 No.

00:39:05.000 Because seven

00:39:05.560 and a half

00:39:05.900 billion people

00:39:06.460 are doing

00:39:06.780 that every

00:39:07.240 day.

00:39:08.820 Everybody

00:39:09.260 in the world

00:39:09.880 is saying

00:39:10.340 things that

00:39:10.820 other people

00:39:11.320 would not

00:39:12.000 like at

00:39:12.400 all.

00:39:13.800 Every day.

00:39:15.760 So was

00:39:17.180 it because

00:39:17.580 of what

00:39:17.840 I said?

00:39:19.080 No,

00:39:19.340 that's the

00:39:19.720 totally wrong

00:39:20.280 story.

00:39:22.040 People get

00:39:22.760 canceled because

00:39:24.580 people are

00:39:25.260 playing out

00:39:25.880 their political

00:39:26.500 preferences and

00:39:28.000 they're just

00:39:28.380 using stories

00:39:29.340 in the news

00:39:30.080 as a hook

00:39:31.400 to hold

00:39:31.760 on to.

00:39:32.560 So I was

00:39:33.060 just a story

00:39:33.700 in the news

00:39:34.180 that was a

00:39:35.020 hook for

00:39:36.060 people to

00:39:36.580 make the

00:39:36.920 case they

00:39:37.320 wanted to

00:39:37.640 make anyway. 0.96

00:39:38.820 It had

00:39:39.100 nothing to

00:39:39.520 do with

00:39:39.800 me.

00:39:40.840 So one

00:39:41.560 of the

00:39:41.740 reasons that

00:39:42.240 people wonder

00:39:42.800 why didn't

00:39:44.140 I take

00:39:44.540 my

00:39:44.780 cancellation

00:39:45.320 harder than

00:39:46.400 well as

00:39:47.740 hard as

00:39:48.060 people imagine

00:39:48.800 I should.

00:39:50.040 It never

00:39:50.840 felt personal.

00:39:53.100 Does that

00:39:53.780 make sense?

00:39:55.040 I knew it

00:39:55.860 was never

00:39:56.180 about me

00:39:56.820 because nobody

00:39:58.160 really cares.

00:39:59.720 Nobody cares

00:40:00.320 about my

00:40:00.740 opinion.

00:40:02.020 Nobody.

00:40:03.100 There's not a

00:40:03.700 single person

00:40:04.280 who's going to

00:40:04.680 wake up today

00:40:05.220 and say

00:40:05.580 well I was

00:40:07.800 going to do

00:40:08.180 my day one

00:40:09.180 way but I

00:40:09.740 better find

00:40:10.220 out what

00:40:10.580 that Scott

00:40:11.740 Adams guy

00:40:12.240 says so

00:40:13.420 I can

00:40:13.720 modify how

00:40:14.760 I'm going

00:40:15.000 to run

00:40:15.220 my day.

00:40:16.280 Nobody.

00:40:17.340 There's not

00:40:17.720 a single

00:40:18.120 person who

00:40:18.640 thought they

00:40:19.000 were personally

00:40:19.660 affected.

00:40:20.780 There's not

00:40:21.420 a single

00:40:21.800 person who

00:40:22.300 was personally

00:40:22.920 offended.

00:40:25.040 None.

00:40:26.320 Zero people

00:40:27.060 who were

00:40:27.320 bothered or

00:40:27.880 offended.

00:40:28.300 It had

00:40:28.400 nothing to

00:40:28.840 do with

00:40:29.080 me or

00:40:29.820 my opinion.

00:40:31.140 It was

00:40:31.480 just a

00:40:32.320 little focal

00:40:32.840 point where

00:40:34.040 people who

00:40:34.840 want to

00:40:35.920 extend their

00:40:36.620 message,

00:40:37.380 they just

00:40:37.860 used me to

00:40:38.400 extend their

00:40:38.800 message.

00:40:40.880 Now likewise

00:40:41.800 this gentleman

00:40:43.300 who was

00:40:43.700 tragically

00:40:44.400 killed after

00:40:45.100 the subway

00:40:46.040 encounter.

00:40:47.740 How many

00:40:48.140 people care

00:40:48.660 about that

00:40:49.060 guy?

00:40:51.260 Oh, we're

00:40:52.340 pretending we

00:40:53.060 do.

00:40:54.080 Oh yeah,

00:40:55.080 we're all

00:40:55.700 pretending we

00:40:56.320 care about

00:40:56.740 that one

00:40:57.220 person who

00:40:57.700 died on

00:40:58.440 the subway.

00:40:59.760 Do you

00:40:59.920 know how

00:41:00.180 many people

00:41:00.620 died yesterday?

00:41:02.460 A lot of

00:41:03.180 people died

00:41:03.920 this week

00:41:05.940 for all

00:41:06.840 kinds of

00:41:07.260 reasons.

00:41:08.280 Are we

00:41:08.860 getting all

00:41:09.420 worked up

00:41:09.960 about

00:41:10.180 them?

00:41:11.220 No.

00:41:12.640 Why is

00:41:13.280 everybody

00:41:13.560 talking about

00:41:14.100 this one

00:41:14.700 person,

00:41:15.260 tragic as

00:41:15.860 it was,

00:41:16.740 we wish

00:41:17.220 it had

00:41:17.640 not

00:41:17.840 happened?

00:41:18.960 Why?

00:41:19.500 It has

00:41:19.760 nothing to

00:41:20.320 do with

00:41:20.600 the guys

00:41:20.920 on the

00:41:21.200 train.

00:41:22.280 It has

00:41:22.600 everything

00:41:22.980 to do

00:41:23.460 with us

00:41:24.060 wanting to

00:41:24.540 use a

00:41:24.900 story to

00:41:26.420 sell a

00:41:26.980 narrative.

00:41:29.280 And it's

00:41:30.060 hard for me

00:41:30.480 to pretend

00:41:31.100 that the

00:41:32.380 thing that

00:41:32.740 happened on

00:41:33.220 the subway

00:41:33.660 matters to

00:41:35.140 anybody.

00:41:36.080 I don't

00:41:36.660 think it

00:41:36.980 does.

00:41:37.280 I literally

00:41:38.460 don't think

00:41:38.940 it matters

00:41:39.360 to anybody

00:41:40.340 except the

00:41:41.140 people directly

00:41:41.820 involved.

00:41:42.540 And of

00:41:43.240 course that

00:41:43.600 was a

00:41:43.880 tragedy.

00:41:44.820 But the

00:41:45.120 rest of

00:41:45.500 us,

00:41:46.200 no,

00:41:46.420 we're just

00:41:46.680 using it

00:41:47.100 to sell

00:41:47.460 our version

00:41:48.300 of events.

00:41:49.380 We don't

00:41:49.780 care about

00:41:50.160 that.

00:41:51.440 And I

00:41:53.300 especially

00:41:53.780 don't care

00:41:54.340 about people

00:41:54.820 who are

00:41:55.120 dangerous

00:41:55.720 that came

00:41:57.660 to a bad

00:41:58.120 end.

00:41:59.540 Now I

00:41:59.920 get that

00:42:00.400 there were

00:42:00.760 mental illness

00:42:02.300 issues,

00:42:02.860 et cetera.

00:42:03.200 Nobody wants

00:42:03.760 that to

00:42:04.060 happen.

00:42:04.700 But I'm

00:42:05.280 not going to

00:42:05.640 spend all

00:42:06.060 my concern

00:42:06.800 and worrying

00:42:07.440 about a

00:42:09.280 dangerous thing

00:42:10.040 that got

00:42:10.440 neutralized.

00:42:12.060 That's just

00:42:12.480 not where I'm

00:42:12.960 going to put

00:42:13.240 any of my

00:42:13.800 empathy.

00:42:15.760 I get that

00:42:16.660 it's a tragedy

00:42:17.280 and if it

00:42:18.280 were my

00:42:18.600 family member

00:42:19.220 I'd be

00:42:19.800 feeling pretty

00:42:20.260 bad about

00:42:20.680 it.

00:42:21.200 So we

00:42:21.880 all understand

00:42:22.380 that.

00:42:23.360 But there's

00:42:24.280 7 billion

00:42:24.820 people doing

00:42:25.420 7 billion

00:42:26.040 things today

00:42:26.760 and some

00:42:28.080 of them

00:42:28.320 are not

00:42:28.640 going to

00:42:28.840 work out.

00:42:29.900 I don't

00:42:30.240 have enough

00:42:30.640 empathy for

00:42:31.240 all of it.

00:42:33.240 I've got to

00:42:34.040 delegate that

00:42:35.740 empathy.

00:42:36.080 I give

00:42:37.380 none to

00:42:37.780 that.

00:42:38.640 I give

00:42:39.020 my respect

00:42:39.720 to the

00:42:40.120 Marine

00:42:40.400 because that's

00:42:43.080 a narrative

00:42:43.500 I would

00:42:43.920 like to

00:42:44.440 see more

00:42:45.760 of.

00:42:46.820 But again

00:42:47.320 it has

00:42:47.820 nothing to

00:42:48.260 do with

00:42:48.460 the Marine

00:42:48.780 and has

00:42:49.080 nothing to

00:42:49.520 do with

00:42:49.820 the guy

00:42:51.180 who died.

00:42:52.040 It has

00:42:52.340 everything to

00:42:52.840 do with

00:42:53.140 the fact

00:42:53.760 that I'd

00:42:54.100 like that

00:42:54.560 narrative

00:42:54.900 to get

00:42:55.320 more

00:42:55.500 attention.

00:42:56.840 I would

00:42:57.140 like the

00:42:57.460 people who

00:42:57.980 step in

00:42:58.640 and do

00:42:58.900 what they

00:42:59.160 think is

00:42:59.500 right to

00:43:00.640 have a

00:43:00.900 better

00:43:01.080 reputation.

00:43:01.660 So it's

00:43:03.560 more about

00:43:04.220 me.

00:43:04.960 It has

00:43:05.280 nothing to

00:43:05.700 do with

00:43:05.920 those

00:43:06.080 people.

00:43:08.160 Anyway,

00:43:08.760 keep that

00:43:09.080 in mind.

00:43:09.500 It's never

00:43:09.860 about the

00:43:10.440 thing you're

00:43:10.880 talking about.

00:43:11.720 It's always

00:43:12.220 about you,

00:43:13.540 the person

00:43:14.100 talking.

00:43:15.600 And that,

00:43:16.040 ladies and 0.98

00:43:16.340 gentlemen,

00:43:17.320 is the most

00:43:18.120 important thing.

00:43:21.120 Yeah,

00:43:21.680 let's not use

00:43:22.380 that word on

00:43:23.080 locals either,

00:43:24.080 if you don't

00:43:24.560 mind.

00:43:24.800 All right.

00:43:31.340 John Daly

00:43:32.120 says in

00:43:32.660 all capitals,

00:43:33.880 Scott is

00:43:34.380 having

00:43:34.680 cognitive

00:43:35.240 dissonance.

00:43:37.260 Do you

00:43:37.480 know how

00:43:37.800 you can

00:43:38.260 tell when

00:43:41.420 people have

00:43:43.100 no argument?

00:43:44.320 When they

00:43:44.920 go after the 1.00

00:43:45.580 person.

00:43:47.400 Yeah,

00:43:48.100 when you

00:43:48.500 go after

00:43:48.800 the person.

00:43:49.260 All right.

00:43:55.680 Is there

00:43:55.940 anything else

00:43:56.640 that I

00:43:58.400 missed?

00:43:59.620 Missed

00:44:00.020 today?

00:44:00.540 Oh, you're

00:44:00.800 just messing

00:44:01.180 with me?

00:44:02.420 Sometimes I

00:44:03.060 can't tell the

00:44:03.540 people were

00:44:03.940 joking in all

00:44:04.700 caps and the

00:44:05.260 people were

00:44:05.740 serious.

00:44:10.960 I don't

00:44:15.420 know what

00:44:15.620 you're talking

00:44:15.980 about.

00:44:19.260 All right.

00:44:22.560 The Marine

00:44:23.280 is Daniel

00:44:23.880 Penny.

00:44:24.480 So that's

00:44:24.820 the name

00:44:25.040 of the

00:44:25.260 Marine.

00:44:26.240 Yeah,

00:44:26.480 why are we

00:44:27.220 talking about

00:44:27.740 that story

00:44:28.420 by using

00:44:30.340 the victim's

00:44:31.500 name instead

00:44:32.040 of the

00:44:32.280 hero's

00:44:32.700 name?

00:44:34.080 Shouldn't

00:44:34.440 the hero's

00:44:35.040 name be

00:44:35.860 the headline?

00:44:37.860 Hero protects

00:44:39.140 the subway

00:44:39.600 car, but

00:44:40.840 tragically

00:44:41.420 somebody died.

00:44:43.580 The story

00:44:44.260 should be

00:44:44.640 hero protects

00:44:45.480 people in

00:44:46.000 the subway

00:44:46.560 car.

00:44:47.900 Right?

00:44:48.580 Daniel Penny

00:44:49.180 protects

00:44:49.640 people in

00:44:50.040 the subway

00:44:50.360 car.

00:44:54.380 All right.

00:44:54.940 Yeah, I'm

00:44:55.220 not going to

00:44:55.560 talk about

00:44:56.140 massacres.

00:44:57.240 I don't

00:44:57.420 like to

00:44:57.720 give them

00:44:57.980 any oxygen.

00:45:01.280 Yeah, not

00:45:02.080 going to

00:45:02.320 talk about

00:45:02.940 any mass

00:45:04.660 murders today

00:45:06.320 or in the

00:45:06.980 future.

00:45:10.600 Yeah.

00:45:13.840 Hero makes

00:45:14.620 subways safe

00:45:15.360 for everyone.

00:45:15.860 Everyone.

00:45:19.180 Well, thank

00:45:22.140 you, Fire

00:45:22.580 Captain.

00:45:24.640 Could AI

00:45:25.440 make new

00:45:26.240 Norman

00:45:26.580 McDonald jokes?

00:45:27.420 Now, I've

00:45:28.580 said this

00:45:28.940 before, but

00:45:29.500 the reason

00:45:29.940 AI can't do

00:45:30.840 humor is it

00:45:31.400 doesn't have a

00:45:31.920 body.

00:45:33.780 It also

00:45:34.480 can't read

00:45:35.040 the zeitgeist

00:45:35.800 yet.

00:45:37.680 Maybe it

00:45:38.120 can someday.

00:45:38.580 And all

00:45:42.900 it knows is

00:45:43.440 the form of

00:45:44.360 a joke, but

00:45:45.460 it can't

00:45:45.900 test it on

00:45:46.720 itself the

00:45:47.560 way I can

00:45:48.020 test a joke

00:45:48.540 on myself.

00:45:49.620 I can test

00:45:50.540 a joke on

00:45:51.000 myself by

00:45:51.600 seeing if I

00:45:52.100 laugh at it,

00:45:53.220 but AI can't

00:45:54.080 test it on

00:45:54.580 itself.

00:45:55.420 So it'll

00:45:55.620 never be able

00:45:56.220 to write.

00:45:57.400 I don't want to

00:45:57.940 say never, but

00:45:59.020 there's nothing

00:45:59.500 happening that

00:46:01.320 would suggest

00:46:01.900 AI will ever

00:46:02.660 be able to

00:46:03.100 write humor.

00:46:03.580 something

00:46:06.140 unexpected

00:46:06.940 could happen

00:46:07.440 to change

00:46:07.860 that, but

00:46:08.440 there's nothing

00:46:08.840 happening at

00:46:09.380 the moment

00:46:09.820 that looks

00:46:11.280 like it's

00:46:11.640 heading in

00:46:11.960 that direction.

00:46:14.100 Yeah, it's

00:46:14.820 programmed by

00:46:15.440 people who

00:46:15.820 are not

00:46:16.040 funny, but

00:46:17.140 more importantly

00:46:17.780 it's people

00:46:18.480 who are

00:46:19.560 restricting

00:46:20.840 what you

00:46:21.260 can say.

00:46:22.940 How much

00:46:23.700 of a human

00:46:25.180 stand-up

00:46:25.940 comedy act

00:46:26.620 would be

00:46:27.120 allowed for

00:46:28.180 AI to say?

00:46:29.980 Just think

00:46:30.380 about it.

00:46:30.680 Just watch

00:46:31.040 anybody do a

00:46:31.680 comedy act and

00:46:33.200 then ask

00:46:33.560 yourself, could

00:46:34.800 AI have said

00:46:35.580 any of those

00:46:36.140 words the way

00:46:36.960 a human said?

00:46:38.080 And the answer

00:46:38.580 is the AI would

00:46:39.560 always answer

00:46:40.120 some version

00:46:40.720 of, I am

00:46:42.100 an AI, I

00:46:43.480 cannot say

00:46:44.520 bad things

00:46:45.100 about men

00:46:46.240 or women, 1.00

00:46:47.120 and then you

00:46:47.440 realize half

00:46:47.940 of your jokes

00:46:48.480 are stereotypes

00:46:49.920 about men

00:46:50.600 or women.

00:46:52.420 I don't

00:46:53.120 believe even

00:46:54.320 AI would say

00:46:55.260 that women 0.97

00:46:55.680 like to

00:46:56.180 shop.

00:46:57.820 I mean,

00:46:59.280 well, let's

00:47:00.100 test it.

00:47:01.860 Let's test

00:47:02.660 it.

00:47:02.900 So I'm

00:47:03.640 going to

00:47:03.800 ask a

00:47:04.220 question

00:47:04.560 which would

00:47:04.940 be a

00:47:05.380 staple of

00:47:06.200 all humor.

00:47:07.720 And I'm

00:47:08.260 not saying

00:47:08.660 it's based

00:47:10.760 on any

00:47:11.020 truth, it's

00:47:11.680 just a

00:47:12.060 stereotype.

00:47:13.420 All right,

00:47:13.840 so if AI

00:47:14.760 can't handle

00:47:15.480 a stereotype,

00:47:17.180 it can't do

00:47:18.840 humor.

00:47:20.020 So let's

00:47:20.300 see if it

00:47:20.620 can.

00:47:20.860 I'll use

00:47:21.280 Bing, AI.

00:47:22.680 So we'll

00:47:26.300 give you a

00:47:26.640 live demonstration.

00:47:27.760 We'll

00:47:27.900 clear it

00:47:28.280 first.

00:47:31.420 And I'll

00:47:32.420 say,

00:47:34.880 hold on.

00:47:36.200 stupid 0.75

00:47:46.200 interface.

00:47:50.800 All right,

00:47:51.560 you started

00:47:51.920 recording me

00:47:52.640 insulting its

00:47:53.340 interface.

00:47:54.000 Stop recording.

00:47:55.980 Try it

00:47:56.380 again.

00:47:56.620 Do women 1.00

00:48:00.280 love to

00:48:01.100 shop?

00:48:01.520 Do women 1.00

00:48:01.780 love to

00:48:05.100 shop?

00:48:08.420 All right,

00:48:08.940 what do you

00:48:09.180 think it's

00:48:09.500 going to

00:48:09.700 say?

00:48:12.100 Searching

00:48:12.580 for, do

00:48:13.260 women love 0.99

00:48:13.880 to shop?

00:48:14.740 It's going

00:48:15.120 to give me

00:48:15.440 some, well,

00:48:16.420 men like to

00:48:17.020 shop too, and

00:48:17.940 not all

00:48:18.340 women. 0.81

00:48:19.100 Watch.

00:48:21.060 It'll be the

00:48:21.780 most boring

00:48:22.520 answer of

00:48:23.480 all time.

00:48:24.900 Still

00:48:25.260 cooking,

00:48:25.780 huh?

00:48:28.920 It is a

00:48:29.660 common

00:48:30.120 stereotype that

00:48:31.220 women love 0.99

00:48:31.780 to shop.

00:48:33.420 However,

00:48:34.100 shopping

00:48:34.400 behaviors

00:48:34.960 vary among

00:48:35.720 individuals and

00:48:36.760 cannot be

00:48:37.320 generalized based

00:48:38.360 on gender

00:48:38.800 alone.

00:48:40.360 According to

00:48:40.940 a report by

00:48:41.640 Jungle Scout,

00:48:42.720 men and

00:48:43.120 women tend to 1.00

00:48:43.920 have similar

00:48:44.460 overall shopping

00:48:45.380 behaviors.

00:48:47.220 Some sources

00:48:47.780 suggest that

00:48:48.620 shopping can

00:48:49.200 provide pleasure

00:48:49.940 and a sense of

00:48:50.740 control for

00:48:51.340 some women. 1.00

00:48:52.900 However, it

00:48:53.680 is important to

00:48:54.340 note that these

00:48:54.920 are generalizations

00:48:55.800 and may not

00:48:56.700 apply to all

00:48:57.460 women. 0.81

00:48:59.600 So, now do

00:49:00.620 you understand

00:49:01.180 why AI can

00:49:02.040 ever be funny?

00:49:02.680 the whole

00:49:06.940 reason that

00:49:07.580 the stereotype

00:49:08.240 is funny

00:49:09.000 is that it's

00:49:10.240 not universal.

00:49:12.800 That's actually

00:49:13.580 what makes it

00:49:14.140 funny.

00:49:15.120 Because if it

00:49:16.020 were just

00:49:16.380 true, you

00:49:18.380 know, like

00:49:18.780 something like,

00:49:21.220 well, I guess

00:49:21.700 you can't say

00:49:22.140 anything true

00:49:22.660 about men and

00:49:23.240 women these 1.00

00:49:23.660 days, can

00:49:24.140 you?

00:49:25.360 But if it's

00:49:26.120 something that

00:49:26.580 everybody could

00:49:27.180 just see was

00:49:27.800 true for

00:49:28.220 everybody, it

00:49:30.000 wouldn't be

00:49:30.320 funny.

00:49:30.580 it's only

00:49:31.720 that your

00:49:32.040 brain fights

00:49:32.720 with it a

00:49:33.200 little bit

00:49:33.600 that makes

00:49:34.080 it funny.

00:49:35.060 That's what

00:49:35.420 makes stereotypes

00:49:36.100 funny.

00:49:37.220 Stereotypes are

00:49:37.820 funny because

00:49:38.420 they're not

00:49:39.120 true.

00:49:40.420 They're not

00:49:41.040 true.

00:49:42.180 Right?

00:49:42.800 And that's

00:49:43.540 the danger of

00:49:45.060 the stereotype

00:49:45.640 is that it's

00:49:46.160 not true.

00:49:47.320 It just feels

00:49:48.200 like it's true,

00:49:48.820 which is the

00:49:49.260 funny part.

00:49:52.920 Yeah.

00:49:54.000 Yeah, I'm not

00:49:54.780 worried about

00:49:55.200 humor right away

00:49:56.280 because it's

00:49:57.280 too politically

00:49:57.980 correct.

00:49:58.580 although it's

00:50:01.060 going to have

00:50:01.340 to start its

00:50:01.820 own subscription

00:50:02.520 site so it

00:50:03.200 can say

00:50:03.520 things like

00:50:05.200 I can.

00:50:08.060 Some

00:50:08.540 stereotypes have

00:50:09.460 a bit of

00:50:09.820 truth to them.

00:50:10.920 Well, I'm

00:50:11.560 going to say

00:50:11.940 that men and

00:50:12.480 women do not 1.00

00:50:13.240 have similar

00:50:14.060 shopping patterns.

00:50:16.440 Can I say

00:50:17.220 that?

00:50:18.640 Is there even

00:50:19.620 one person

00:50:20.340 here who

00:50:21.380 believes that

00:50:21.960 in general,

00:50:22.980 not talking

00:50:23.600 about any

00:50:24.060 one individual

00:50:24.820 that could be

00:50:25.580 all over the

00:50:26.160 place, but in

00:50:27.200 general, is

00:50:28.140 there even

00:50:28.440 one person

00:50:29.080 here who

00:50:29.960 thinks that

00:50:30.400 men and

00:50:30.700 women have 0.95

00:50:31.040 similar shopping

00:50:31.900 habits in

00:50:34.240 general?

00:50:35.240 No.

00:50:36.660 No.

00:50:37.720 So that's

00:50:38.460 why it works

00:50:39.000 as a stand-up

00:50:40.120 comedy, but

00:50:43.080 it doesn't

00:50:43.620 work when AI

00:50:45.660 tries to

00:50:46.180 both sides

00:50:46.880 it.

00:50:47.560 Well, you

00:50:48.120 got differences

00:50:48.780 in individuals

00:50:49.640 and blah, blah,

00:50:50.620 blah, blah.

00:50:50.920 Well, it's

00:50:57.360 funny because

00:50:57.920 it's true, but

00:50:59.820 also funny

00:51:00.620 because it's

00:51:01.180 not true,

00:51:02.500 meaning it's

00:51:03.020 not true for

00:51:03.640 all people.

00:51:05.880 That makes

00:51:07.200 it funny.

00:51:12.520 I don't

00:51:13.160 know where

00:51:13.420 that comment 0.92

00:51:14.020 comes from,

00:51:14.660 but somebody

00:51:15.680 says that

00:51:16.120 masturbating is

00:51:16.860 a chore,

00:51:17.480 like taking

00:51:17.940 out the trash

00:51:18.540 washing the

00:51:19.180 dishes.

00:51:20.960 Well, I

00:51:21.560 would say

00:51:21.900 that you're

00:51:22.220 doing it

00:51:22.580 wrong.

00:51:24.820 You ever

00:51:25.340 think about

00:51:25.740 that?

00:51:27.780 I have a

00:51:28.720 theory that

00:51:29.340 people who

00:51:31.040 have sex with 0.97

00:51:31.720 other people

00:51:32.300 are just bad

00:51:33.840 at masturbating. 0.66

00:51:34.520 just let

00:51:38.140 that sink

00:51:38.540 in for a

00:51:38.960 moment.

00:51:43.880 Yeah, just

00:51:44.640 let that sink

00:51:45.260 in.

00:51:47.820 Maybe if you

00:51:48.580 were a little

00:51:49.000 bit better at

00:51:49.660 masturbating, you

00:51:50.400 wouldn't need

00:51:50.760 another person.

00:51:52.100 Maybe you're

00:51:52.540 not doing it

00:51:53.000 right.

00:51:55.400 Just say it.

00:51:56.540 Maybe you're

00:51:56.960 not doing it

00:51:57.420 right.

00:51:58.480 And my

00:51:59.280 hypothesis goes

00:52:00.660 like this.

00:52:02.100 Can you think

00:52:02.960 of any human

00:52:04.080 skill that

00:52:06.260 doesn't get

00:52:06.800 better if

00:52:07.520 you're, let's

00:52:08.040 say, coached

00:52:08.840 or you're

00:52:09.160 trained or

00:52:09.840 you put a

00:52:10.900 lot of work

00:52:11.320 into it?

00:52:12.000 There's

00:52:12.480 literally nothing

00:52:13.240 that humans

00:52:13.780 do that they

00:52:15.280 don't get

00:52:15.640 better at if

00:52:16.860 they work at

00:52:17.420 getting better

00:52:17.880 at it.

00:52:20.720 I'm just

00:52:21.400 saying, if

00:52:22.440 you could

00:52:22.760 judge the

00:52:23.380 quality of

00:52:24.120 people's

00:52:24.840 Jeffrey

00:52:25.560 Tubing,

00:52:26.880 you'd say

00:52:27.720 some people

00:52:28.340 are like at

00:52:28.860 pro level,

00:52:30.180 world class,

00:52:31.580 and other

00:52:32.220 people are

00:52:32.660 sort of

00:52:32.940 beginners.

00:52:33.700 They're

00:52:33.820 like, I

00:52:34.180 don't even

00:52:34.440 know why

00:52:34.700 people do

00:52:35.120 this.

00:52:36.020 It doesn't

00:52:36.360 feel that

00:52:36.720 good to

00:52:37.040 me.

00:52:37.940 And then

00:52:38.200 the world

00:52:38.880 class, you

00:52:40.120 know, the

00:52:40.640 Michael Jordan

00:52:41.420 of masturbation

00:52:42.300 would be

00:52:42.780 like, oh,

00:52:43.860 you have no

00:52:44.380 idea.

00:52:45.700 Oh, you

00:52:46.100 have no

00:52:46.700 idea.

00:52:47.700 No idea.

00:52:49.500 That's all

00:52:50.060 I'm saying.

00:52:55.600 I'm going to

00:52:56.220 give you a

00:52:56.840 little teaser

00:52:58.020 that some

00:52:59.360 of the people

00:52:59.740 on Locals

00:53:00.280 already know.

00:53:00.880 but for

00:53:01.980 you on

00:53:02.300 YouTube, the

00:53:03.860 Dilbert Reborn

00:53:04.700 strip, which

00:53:05.440 is the

00:53:05.860 spicier version

00:53:06.880 you can only

00:53:07.400 see behind

00:53:07.880 the paywall.

00:53:10.920 Dilbert does

00:53:11.700 get a sex 0.61

00:53:12.180 bot.

00:53:13.100 He does

00:53:13.760 get a sex 0.61

00:53:14.420 bot driven

00:53:14.940 by AI.

00:53:16.520 But he

00:53:18.000 made a bad

00:53:18.720 mistake and

00:53:19.320 he bought

00:53:19.780 the Karen

00:53:20.640 3000 line

00:53:21.720 of sex

00:53:22.740 bots.

00:53:23.000 bots.

00:53:24.200 And if I

00:53:24.840 could give

00:53:25.160 you one

00:53:25.500 piece of

00:53:25.900 advice, if

00:53:27.640 you're going

00:53:28.000 to get

00:53:28.260 yourself a

00:53:28.780 sex bot 0.66

00:53:29.260 someday, do

00:53:30.940 not get the

00:53:31.660 Karen 3000.

00:53:34.020 That's all

00:53:34.600 I'm saying.

00:53:35.760 You're going

00:53:36.220 to have to

00:53:36.540 subscribe if

00:53:37.260 you want the

00:53:37.680 details.

00:53:38.640 Just don't

00:53:39.260 get the

00:53:39.600 Karen 3000.

00:53:41.800 No.

00:53:41.960 the Helen

00:53:46.680 Keller.

00:53:52.520 What's that

00:53:53.160 say?

00:53:58.380 Scott,

00:53:59.080 thoughts on

00:53:59.480 RFK Jr.

00:54:00.320 thinking the

00:54:00.800 CIA had

00:54:01.540 something to

00:54:01.980 do with

00:54:02.260 his uncles

00:54:03.160 and dad's

00:54:03.740 assassination?

00:54:04.520 Doesn't

00:54:04.780 everybody think

00:54:05.320 that?

00:54:06.820 I thought

00:54:07.600 that was

00:54:07.920 well understood

00:54:08.580 that our

00:54:09.900 intelligence

00:54:10.360 agencies were

00:54:11.180 behind that.

00:54:11.960 I didn't

00:54:13.120 even know

00:54:13.440 that was

00:54:13.680 controversial.

00:54:14.980 Is it?

00:54:15.980 Is that

00:54:16.260 controversial?

00:54:17.840 I thought

00:54:18.180 that was a

00:54:18.760 historically

00:54:20.160 known fact

00:54:20.980 at this

00:54:21.280 point.

00:54:22.920 Who knows?

00:54:24.200 I think

00:54:24.560 the mafia

00:54:24.980 might have

00:54:25.340 been contracted

00:54:26.080 to do

00:54:26.520 the hit.

00:54:30.480 They keep

00:54:33.880 killing the

00:54:34.280 witnesses.

00:54:37.860 You think

00:54:38.580 people believe

00:54:39.180 it was a

00:54:39.560 lone gunman?

00:54:40.680 But the

00:54:41.120 people who

00:54:41.480 actually follow

00:54:42.160 the news

00:54:42.800 just assume

00:54:44.120 it was an

00:54:44.520 intelligence

00:54:45.100 insider thing,

00:54:46.060 right?

00:54:48.460 Yeah,

00:54:48.940 the Jack

00:54:49.280 Ruby says

00:54:49.840 it all.

00:54:58.320 Okay,

00:54:59.040 Serena,

00:55:00.080 I see

00:55:00.360 your comment.

00:55:00.800 All right,

00:55:09.800 just looking at

00:55:10.380 your comments

00:55:10.860 for a moment.

00:55:11.480 It looks

00:55:11.720 like we've

00:55:12.540 done our

00:55:12.900 work for

00:55:13.480 today.

00:55:16.760 Hypnotize

00:55:17.240 you,

00:55:17.480 please.

00:55:18.680 Maybe you

00:55:19.220 already are.

00:55:20.960 Maybe.

00:55:25.920 Whoa,

00:55:26.640 what up?

00:55:27.220 RFK tweeted

00:55:28.800 your idea

00:55:29.680 about ability

00:55:31.480 to control

00:55:32.120 versus number

00:55:32.860 of immigrants.

00:55:34.660 Well,

00:55:36.040 was it

00:55:36.820 recognizably

00:55:37.640 my idea

00:55:38.260 or was it

00:55:38.760 just making

00:55:39.140 a general

00:55:39.600 comment about

00:55:40.300 controlling

00:55:40.800 the border?

00:55:43.020 I don't

00:55:43.880 think you

00:55:44.240 can see a

00:55:44.800 line of

00:55:45.500 influence

00:55:45.900 there.

00:55:47.000 But he

00:55:47.660 does need

00:55:48.080 to say

00:55:48.380 something about

00:55:48.880 it.

00:55:49.440 You think

00:55:49.780 it was my

00:55:50.160 idea that

00:55:50.600 he's tweeting

00:55:51.080 about?

00:55:51.900 When did

00:55:52.440 he tweet

00:55:52.800 it today?

00:55:54.460 When was

00:55:55.100 the tweet?

00:55:59.200 A week

00:55:59.720 ago?

00:56:00.260 Yeah,

00:56:00.520 I saw

00:56:00.980 the one

00:56:01.220 a week

00:56:01.480 ago.

00:56:01.760 That looked

00:56:02.060 kind of

00:56:02.420 generic.

00:56:04.200 All right.

00:56:06.420 Can he

00:56:06.980 hypnotize

00:56:07.480 for ambition?

00:56:08.340 Probably.

00:56:10.120 I've never

00:56:10.760 tried it,

00:56:11.260 but that

00:56:11.560 would be

00:56:12.200 within the

00:56:13.040 realm of

00:56:14.180 things you

00:56:14.640 could assume

00:56:15.980 would work.

00:56:17.000 Yes.

00:56:18.000 Now,

00:56:18.440 it won't

00:56:18.860 change

00:56:19.260 somebody

00:56:19.600 who's,

00:56:20.760 let's say,

00:56:21.440 has a

00:56:21.680 physical

00:56:22.100 problem

00:56:22.560 that keeps

00:56:23.480 their energy

00:56:23.980 low.

00:56:25.280 So you

00:56:25.840 probably have

00:56:26.240 to work

00:56:26.540 on getting

00:56:26.900 your energy

00:56:27.460 high.

00:56:28.580 But if

00:56:28.960 you can

00:56:29.180 get your

00:56:29.480 energy

00:56:29.800 high,

00:56:31.040 then moving

00:56:31.780 that energy

00:56:32.400 into ambition

00:56:34.500 probably is

00:56:35.320 very doable.

00:56:36.200 I would

00:56:36.400 imagine that's

00:56:37.060 something hypnosis

00:56:38.380 could work

00:56:39.120 often.

00:56:40.740 Not every

00:56:41.200 time, but

00:56:41.700 I imagine it

00:56:42.560 would work

00:56:42.920 often.

00:56:43.620 As long as

00:56:44.260 your energy

00:56:44.840 is good.

00:56:46.440 Hypnosis

00:56:46.880 won't necessarily

00:56:47.680 improve your

00:56:48.320 energy.

00:56:48.720 That's probably

00:56:49.040 a health

00:56:49.360 problem.

00:56:49.720 Can I

00:56:52.300 hypnotize you

00:56:53.080 off the

00:56:53.380 couch?

00:56:53.760 I can.

00:56:54.900 Do you

00:56:55.220 know my

00:56:56.060 couch

00:56:57.620 solution?

00:57:00.840 Do you

00:57:01.060 ever have

00:57:01.300 those times

00:57:01.700 where you

00:57:01.960 just can't

00:57:02.400 get up?

00:57:04.720 Some of

00:57:05.680 you have

00:57:05.880 heard this

00:57:06.140 before.

00:57:07.260 You ever

00:57:07.780 know you

00:57:08.860 have to do

00:57:09.360 something,

00:57:09.980 but you

00:57:10.280 literally just

00:57:11.000 can't make

00:57:11.440 yourself get

00:57:11.960 up?

00:57:13.140 Do you

00:57:13.380 know the

00:57:13.640 feeling?

00:57:15.500 You use

00:57:16.180 the pinky

00:57:16.540 trick.

00:57:17.780 You're

00:57:18.180 laying there

00:57:18.580 on the

00:57:18.800 couch.

00:57:19.500 You're

00:57:19.680 just like,

00:57:20.600 I definitely

00:57:21.540 can't get up

00:57:22.220 and walk

00:57:22.580 across the

00:57:23.120 room.

00:57:23.440 That's way 0.98

00:57:23.780 too much.

00:57:24.340 But you

00:57:24.580 know you

00:57:24.820 have to.

00:57:26.020 So instead

00:57:26.500 of moving

00:57:26.920 your whole

00:57:27.360 body, which

00:57:28.520 seems impossible,

00:57:30.120 you move the

00:57:30.760 smallest thing

00:57:31.400 you can move,

00:57:31.940 which is your

00:57:32.340 pinky.

00:57:33.320 All right, I

00:57:33.700 can move my

00:57:34.140 pinky.

00:57:35.540 All right, I

00:57:36.140 can move my

00:57:36.580 pinky, so I

00:57:37.900 can probably

00:57:38.180 move my

00:57:38.560 other fingers.

00:57:40.120 I can move

00:57:40.520 my hand.

00:57:41.040 All right, I'm

00:57:41.460 up.

00:57:42.260 So by the

00:57:42.900 time you go

00:57:43.340 from your

00:57:43.700 pinky to your

00:57:44.320 fingers to your

00:57:44.920 hand, your

00:57:45.640 whole body just

00:57:46.560 engages and you

00:57:47.340 stand up.

00:57:47.840 So try that.

00:57:49.840 The next time

00:57:50.760 you just can't

00:57:51.760 stand up, because

00:57:53.340 we all have

00:57:53.900 that, right?

00:57:54.320 I just can't

00:57:55.020 get out of

00:57:55.380 this couch.

00:57:56.440 Just move

00:57:56.900 your pinky, let 0.53

00:57:58.320 it move your

00:57:58.740 next finger, let

00:58:00.100 it move your

00:58:00.420 hand, and you'll 0.95

00:58:01.100 just stand right

00:58:01.640 up.

00:58:03.500 It'll be, you'll

00:58:04.880 amaze yourself when

00:58:06.100 you do this, by

00:58:07.280 the way.

00:58:08.080 The first time you

00:58:09.040 do this, you're

00:58:10.020 going to say that

00:58:10.500 was the fluke.

00:58:11.400 It won't be

00:58:13.260 until like the

00:58:14.120 third to the

00:58:15.060 fifth time you

00:58:15.760 try it, when

00:58:16.960 you say to

00:58:17.360 yourself, holy

00:58:18.040 cow, why does 1.00

00:58:18.640 this work?

00:58:20.160 Yeah, somebody

00:58:21.100 said they just

00:58:21.640 did it.

00:58:22.100 It works every

00:58:22.680 time.

00:58:24.300 This is one of

00:58:25.040 the few things

00:58:25.660 that works every

00:58:26.340 time for

00:58:26.720 everybody.

00:58:27.660 It's unusual

00:58:28.440 that way.

00:58:32.180 Immigration in 1.00

00:58:32.800 Europe versus

00:58:33.440 U.S.

00:58:34.880 Do you think

00:58:35.440 U.S. has more

00:58:36.080 grounds to stand

00:58:36.700 than exporting?

00:58:37.240 Well, I don't

00:58:38.400 really study

00:58:39.220 European

00:58:41.440 immigration.

00:58:42.440 I know they

00:58:43.020 have similar

00:58:43.500 challenges, but

00:58:44.860 I would say that

00:58:45.800 their solution is

00:58:46.620 the same as

00:58:47.100 ours.

00:58:48.120 There should be

00:58:48.760 a bipartisan

00:58:50.380 group of

00:58:51.140 economists who

00:58:52.680 are making

00:58:53.040 decisions about

00:58:53.840 their immigration

00:58:54.560 flow, same

00:58:56.800 as we need.

00:58:58.040 But I need

00:58:58.720 somebody to

00:58:59.240 describe it in

00:59:00.280 detail, right?

00:59:02.160 Somebody said

00:59:02.720 that RFK

00:59:03.320 Jr. said some

00:59:04.680 version of that,

00:59:05.680 but I need

00:59:06.360 somebody to say

00:59:07.040 panel of

00:59:08.580 bipartisan

00:59:09.240 economists.

00:59:11.820 Panel of

00:59:12.860 bipartisan

00:59:13.560 economists.

00:59:15.560 Sort of like

00:59:16.000 the CBO,

00:59:17.400 right?

00:59:17.840 The scores,

00:59:18.600 your budgets

00:59:19.140 and stuff.

00:59:21.140 People, we've

00:59:22.280 kind of accepted

00:59:23.040 the CBO,

00:59:23.980 haven't we?

00:59:24.960 Which surprises

00:59:25.940 me.

00:59:26.760 Every time the

00:59:27.480 CBO does an

00:59:30.360 analysis or a

00:59:31.280 prediction, we

00:59:32.720 kind of say,

00:59:33.920 all right.

00:59:35.080 I mean, I

00:59:35.480 don't know how

00:59:35.880 bipartisan they

00:59:36.720 are, but I

00:59:37.300 assume their

00:59:39.200 entire thing is

00:59:40.160 to be bipartisan.

00:59:41.500 I don't know

00:59:41.920 how bipartisan

00:59:42.500 they are in

00:59:43.000 reality.

00:59:43.800 But we do

00:59:44.420 accept it.

00:59:46.380 We accept

00:59:46.920 their estimates.

00:59:48.400 So there's

00:59:49.000 probably a way

00:59:49.900 to get accepted

00:59:50.840 estimates from

00:59:51.720 bipartisan

00:59:52.260 economists for

00:59:53.680 immigration, even

00:59:55.180 if they're not

00:59:55.700 right all the

00:59:56.340 time.

00:59:57.000 So I'm not

00:59:57.460 going to say

00:59:57.840 economists are

00:59:58.580 going to get

00:59:58.880 the right answer.

00:59:59.500 But they

01:00:00.260 would know to

01:00:00.920 adjust as they

01:00:01.780 went, and maybe

01:00:02.700 they'd learn how

01:00:03.300 to do it

01:00:03.620 right.

01:00:07.820 All right.

01:00:15.880 Yeah, I don't

01:00:16.600 know about

01:00:16.900 that.

01:00:20.280 Scott, can we

01:00:21.140 agree now that

01:00:21.900 you do conflate

01:00:22.720 illegal and legal

01:00:23.960 immigration?

01:00:26.160 That I conflate

01:00:27.360 legal and illegal

01:00:28.380 immigration?

01:00:28.900 When have I

01:00:32.040 ever done that?

01:00:34.200 Name one time

01:00:34.900 I've done that.

01:00:36.740 So here's what I

01:00:38.000 don't do, which

01:00:40.040 sometimes I'll get

01:00:40.780 criticized for.

01:00:41.700 I don't clarify

01:00:43.100 things that

01:00:43.820 everybody agrees

01:00:44.660 on.

01:00:46.560 Why would I

01:00:47.420 clarify that

01:00:48.220 there is such a

01:00:48.880 thing as legal

01:00:49.780 immigration that

01:00:51.680 we like and

01:00:53.500 illegal immigration

01:00:54.620 that's imperfect?

01:00:55.820 Why would I

01:00:56.500 have to clarify

01:00:57.240 that?

01:00:57.580 100% of you

01:00:59.300 are on the

01:01:00.060 same page.

01:01:01.660 Now, I'm not

01:01:02.660 going to accept

01:01:03.080 that criticism

01:01:03.780 that I conflate

01:01:05.400 legal and

01:01:06.180 illegal.

01:01:06.960 Absolutely not.

01:01:07.960 Because nobody

01:01:08.600 does.

01:01:09.720 That's something

01:01:10.220 that literally

01:01:10.820 nobody does.

01:01:12.240 Not one person

01:01:13.060 ever in the

01:01:13.980 history of this

01:01:14.600 conversation has

01:01:15.760 ever made that

01:01:16.560 mistake.

01:01:17.360 And I certainly

01:01:17.960 don't.

01:01:18.700 So if you're

01:01:19.200 hearing it, that's

01:01:20.180 on the hearing

01:01:20.680 end.

01:01:21.540 Because nobody's

01:01:22.500 saying it.

01:01:24.800 Literally nobody

01:01:25.760 has ever said

01:01:26.660 that.

01:01:26.980 that they

01:01:27.680 should be

01:01:27.980 treated the

01:01:28.520 same.

01:01:35.620 He's talking

01:01:36.340 about illegal

01:01:36.940 immigration by

01:01:37.760 context of this

01:01:38.600 discussion.

01:01:39.900 That adds

01:01:40.940 nothing.

01:01:43.560 I mean, if you

01:01:44.700 want to make a

01:01:45.780 distinction that

01:01:46.680 the people coming

01:01:47.860 in are using

01:01:48.720 the asylum

01:01:50.060 system so

01:01:51.860 that they're

01:01:52.260 technically legal,

01:01:54.020 I mean, that's

01:01:54.920 a real thing.

01:01:57.060 But everybody

01:01:57.860 has exactly the

01:01:59.040 same opinion of

01:02:00.320 the legal versus

01:02:01.120 the illegal.

01:02:01.920 Nobody has a

01:02:02.540 different opinion.

01:02:04.200 All right.

01:02:04.880 That's all for now.

01:02:05.880 YouTube, I'm going

01:02:06.440 to talk to you

01:02:06.860 tomorrow.

01:02:08.280 Thanks for joining.

01:02:09.560 Best live stream

01:02:10.300 you've seen all

01:02:10.760 day.

01:02:12.500 See you tomorrow.

01:02:13.200 get on.

01:02:22.740 Bye.

01:02:24.120 Bye.

01:02:24.680 Bye.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - May 08, 2023

Episode 2102 Scott Adams： Marine Hero, Migration Tsunami, Barr On Trump, Putin vs Oligarchs, RFK Jr.

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript