Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2102 Scott Adams： Marine Hero, Migration Tsunami, Barr On Trump, Putin vs Oligarchs, RFK Jr.

00:00:00.140 do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do good morning everybody and welcome to the

00:00:08.720 highlight of civilization where everything exciting and new and wonderful will happen

00:00:13.560 and it's going to happen any moment now and if you'd like to be part of the amazingness

00:00:19.480 that we call coffee with scott adams all you need to be part of this simultaneous sip is a

00:00:25.480 A cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or chalice or stein, a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:32.340 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.

00:00:35.500 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine here, the day, the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:41.340 It's called the Simultaneous Sip.

00:00:48.280 Ah.

00:00:51.740 So invigorating.

00:00:53.160 I feel alive. Alive.

00:00:57.880 Well, let's check the news.

00:01:00.240 I was just talking about this with the local subscribers before I went live on YouTube here.

00:01:06.000 And here's a funny little mystery that I want to see if you can solve.

00:01:12.240 Before I give you the answer, and on locals you already know the answer, but on YouTube,

00:01:18.200 tell me the height of Matt Gaetz.

00:01:22.780 Without Googling it, tell me the height of Matt Gaetz.

00:01:27.200 Go.

00:01:28.900 No, not 25%.

00:01:30.200 He's not 25% tall.

00:01:32.980 Give me his height.

00:01:33.900 I see 6'2", 6'1", oh, somebody Googled it.

00:01:42.440 Somebody Googled it.

00:01:44.120 All right, here's the answer.

00:01:46.900 Or actually, it's not the answer.

00:01:48.280 But what's interesting is if you Google it, he comes up as 5'7".

00:01:53.680 Is there any chance he's 5'7"?

00:01:57.320 There's none.

00:01:59.280 If you look at pictures of him standing next to Trump, they're about the same height.

00:02:04.080 Yeah, I don't know what he is, but he's not 5'7".

00:02:06.280 So how in the world does the entire Internet get the height of a prominent member of Congress wrong?

00:02:16.320 Where did that come from?

00:02:17.440 Was that kind of a prank?

00:02:20.360 I mean, somebody said they saw that and they were starting to doubt the Internet about my IQ.

00:02:27.300 Because, you know, my IQ is usually listed at 180.

00:02:29.880 And people are starting to say, well, wait a minute.

00:02:33.500 If Matt Gaetz is listed at 5'7", if that's not true, could it be also true that Scott's IQ is not 180?

00:02:44.000 And I think, no, anything's possible.

00:02:47.540 All right, well, I think it's funny that we have such an easily fact-checked thing that the Internet has wrong.

00:02:55.600 Pretty sure it's wrong.

00:02:57.600 Somebody's going to have to measure him and get back to me.

00:02:59.880 All right.

00:03:04.000 Let's talk about this, the situation about the Marine who put a chokehold on the gentleman who died in the subway.

00:03:15.380 Now, in my opinion, the Marine is a hero.

00:03:21.320 And I won't hear any arguments on the other side.

00:03:24.520 I'm just so done with this, everything's got to be a George Floyd.

00:03:30.520 No, everything isn't George Floyd.

00:03:33.000 Sometimes you're just reminded of it.

00:03:35.440 But this is very different.

00:03:37.880 The other thing that is a, let's say, a curiosity.

00:03:42.100 If there are any doctors here, there are usually some doctors watching the live stream.

00:03:47.540 If there are any doctors here, identify yourself when you answer this question, if you're willing.

00:03:51.640 If somebody dies from being choked, don't they usually die while they're being choked?

00:04:00.180 Because this individual was very much alive after the choking.

00:04:05.860 He didn't look in good shape, but he was very much alive and breathing.

00:04:09.940 Is there such a thing as dying from the choking, but like an hour later?

00:04:15.100 Is that something that can happen?

00:04:20.340 Brain damage?

00:04:24.700 Let's not talk about George Floyd.

00:04:30.300 But I guess I just don't know the answer to that question.

00:04:34.140 But I'll tell you what things are obvious.

00:04:37.640 What's obvious from the video is that nobody involved thought anything like a murder was happening.

00:04:45.100 Would you agree?

00:04:46.460 That there was nobody who was a witness who was aware of anything that looked like killing.

00:04:53.700 And when it was over, at least the part where they're holding down was over,

00:04:58.240 it still didn't look like anybody got killed because he was still alive.

00:05:02.540 So they were concerned about him.

00:05:04.220 So obviously their intention was not to kill him.

00:05:06.960 So there's no intention involved there.

00:05:08.740 So I feel like it's time to turn the corner on the bullshit.

00:05:16.640 We don't just have to assume the white guy's guilty and the black guy's innocent and he lived a wonderful life.

00:05:24.060 Sometimes the people who get killed, it's unfortunate,

00:05:28.720 but it's not because anybody did anything necessarily wrong.

00:05:32.540 So I'm not going to back down on this one.

00:05:38.080 I don't know about you, but I'm just not going to accept the narrative.

00:05:41.020 It's just not George Floyd.

00:05:42.440 Stop talking about him.

00:05:44.220 It has nothing to do with this.

00:05:45.980 This was somebody who probably looks like he had some mental problems.

00:05:50.900 But that was not anybody else's problem.

00:05:54.920 The people who were being threatened by him,

00:05:57.240 it wasn't their problem that he had a mental problem.

00:05:59.320 Well, their problem is that they were in danger or potential danger.

00:06:04.000 And they found a solution for it.

00:06:06.640 And nobody else got hurt.

00:06:09.120 So I would call that a horrible situation,

00:06:12.200 which unfortunately was pretty much prescribed by the elements that went into it.

00:06:19.080 It was sort of the only way it could have come up.

00:06:21.060 Apparently the way it happened is the only way it could have happened

00:06:23.940 given the variables that went into the situation.

00:06:26.080 So I'm not going to be outraged by that,

00:06:30.460 even though we can be...

00:06:32.040 You can have empathy for anybody who died, of course.

00:06:35.840 But I can't be outraged for any political reason about that.

00:06:41.040 All right.

00:06:44.660 Bill Barr had some words about Trump.

00:06:48.500 So as you know, Bill Barr was in the Trump administration.

00:06:51.400 So he got to see things from the inside.

00:06:54.620 But he thinks that even if you like Trump policies,

00:06:57.940 that Trump is uniquely unable to deliver them.

00:07:01.900 And that the only things that Trump accomplished

00:07:04.040 are things that probably any Republican could have done.

00:07:09.120 What do you think of that?

00:07:10.840 And that what Trump adds is chaos,

00:07:13.780 and he doesn't know how to manage toward getting something.

00:07:17.180 He's more like somebody who injects chaos,

00:07:20.480 and the only things that get done

00:07:21.640 are the things that any Republican could have gotten done.

00:07:26.060 What do you think?

00:07:28.460 Now, one example of that would be build the wall.

00:07:32.920 So build the wall is something

00:07:34.400 that not every standard Republican necessarily wanted,

00:07:38.800 but he couldn't get it done.

00:07:42.500 That's a good point.

00:07:44.760 Fentanyl didn't get it done.

00:07:47.180 Would you agree?

00:07:48.800 There was no real change in Fentanyl.

00:07:52.600 So I would say he did not,

00:07:54.760 although he did do a great job

00:07:56.340 of reducing immigration at the border.

00:08:00.100 But would a traditional Republican have done that?

00:08:05.040 I'm going to say no.

00:08:07.120 It feels like they wouldn't have.

00:08:09.400 It feels like that was uniquely Trump.

00:08:12.300 The other thing that's uniquely Trump

00:08:14.060 is the stuff that didn't happen.

00:08:16.540 It's hard to give somebody credit for things that didn't happen,

00:08:20.000 but how about he didn't start any new wars?

00:08:24.480 How about that?

00:08:25.400 And the only one he was involved with,

00:08:26.960 he wound down or won.

00:08:28.980 He won against ISIS,

00:08:31.980 and he wound down Afghanistan,

00:08:34.560 which wasn't a useful war.

00:08:37.040 So I don't agree with Bill Barr

00:08:39.780 that Trump has nothing unique to add.

00:08:43.280 He does have something unique to add.

00:08:44.760 And I think that he uniquely can get us out of the Ukraine situation.

00:08:48.360 I think he could uniquely do something useful with Taiwan.

00:08:54.000 And he makes me laugh every time he tells his strategy out loud,

00:08:59.280 when he brags about the fact that,

00:09:02.640 when he said that Moscow would be a risk if Putin took,

00:09:07.540 I don't know, whatever, Ukraine or something.

00:09:09.180 And he laughs about the fact,

00:09:12.460 or he jokes,

00:09:14.340 that if Putin only believed there was a 10% chance he was serious,

00:09:20.400 that was still enough to deter him.

00:09:22.880 But it's funny,

00:09:23.520 because Trump talks about it like it's not serious.

00:09:27.560 He just needs the other person to think he might be.

00:09:31.880 And that's enough.

00:09:33.220 And it might be.

00:09:34.020 That might be enough.

00:09:35.340 I don't know.

00:09:35.720 That's a hard claim to check.

00:09:39.740 But I would partially agree with Barr

00:09:43.420 in that Trump probably brings more chaos.

00:09:49.520 But I wonder if the situation would be the same

00:09:53.280 with the second presidency.

00:09:56.160 Do you think if Trump did a second round,

00:09:59.580 he would have weak advisors

00:10:01.740 because he'd have the same problem?

00:10:03.420 Nobody wants to work with him?

00:10:04.580 You know, the people with the most capability

00:10:07.040 don't want to get near the blast center?

00:10:12.380 So you think he'd be able to get higher quality advisors

00:10:15.820 and operatives than last time?

00:10:19.360 I think he would.

00:10:20.640 I think he just knows the landscape better.

00:10:23.180 So he'd know who to hire and who not to?

00:10:27.740 I don't know.

00:10:29.120 Could go either way.

00:10:29.960 So, titled 42 ends,

00:10:34.740 so that's the immigration thing that would,

00:10:38.800 I guess that was based on COVID

00:10:40.160 and it was at least keeping some of the immigration down.

00:10:45.100 But as soon as that ends,

00:10:45.920 we're expecting hundreds of thousands,

00:10:49.080 if not millions of people to stream over the border.

00:10:52.000 I saw a number of people refer to it as an invasion

00:10:54.300 because there are more immigrants coming over the border

00:10:58.360 in the next year or so, or the last year,

00:11:01.660 compared to the entire invasion of Ukraine.

00:11:05.980 You know, the Russian army didn't put as many people into Ukraine

00:11:08.760 during a massive invasion

00:11:11.220 as we're letting into the country over the border on a regular basis.

00:11:15.600 So would you call that an invasion?

00:11:18.140 Do you think that's a, is that a fair word?

00:11:20.480 That there's an invasion going on?

00:11:24.360 I'm going to say no on that.

00:11:25.920 I'm going to say no on invasion.

00:11:28.480 And here's the difference.

00:11:31.120 Russia invaded Ukraine to take it over.

00:11:36.800 An actual invasion.

00:11:38.740 The people who are coming across the border

00:11:40.360 are trying to join our team.

00:11:43.680 That's the opposite of an invasion.

00:11:45.600 They're literally joining our team.

00:11:50.100 In one generation,

00:11:52.100 their children will be fighting in our military.

00:11:55.660 That is our military.

00:11:58.060 You're watching our military come across the border.

00:12:00.720 It's one generation away,

00:12:02.420 but they will be our military.

00:12:05.320 You know, some number of them

00:12:06.320 will just be our police force,

00:12:08.700 our military.

00:12:11.240 So,

00:12:12.760 now, can we all be adults

00:12:15.520 enough to agree

00:12:16.580 that no generalization

00:12:18.500 applies to all the people?

00:12:20.020 Can we be adult enough?

00:12:22.340 Can we say that there must be

00:12:23.840 some criminals?

00:12:24.900 There has to be some MS-13 people.

00:12:27.800 There has to be.

00:12:29.020 Can we say that

00:12:30.080 they're all coming for different reasons?

00:12:31.860 That's not all one reason.

00:12:33.440 Can we say that

00:12:34.240 some number of them

00:12:34.940 will be some of the best citizens

00:12:36.420 we've ever had,

00:12:37.800 while some other number of them

00:12:39.140 will end up in jail

00:12:40.300 and hurt people?

00:12:41.440 We can say that, right?

00:12:43.200 It's a mix of people.

00:12:44.820 So there's going to be

00:12:45.560 some good, some bad,

00:12:46.800 but I don't like the invasion word.

00:12:49.700 I do like

00:12:51.060 a word that's got some danger built in,

00:12:54.340 because there is some danger.

00:12:55.900 I do like a word

00:12:57.140 that shows

00:12:58.600 it's a big deal,

00:12:59.980 because it's a really big deal,

00:13:02.480 and it's not all good,

00:13:04.380 that's for sure.

00:13:04.980 So, yeah,

00:13:07.360 I just don't see invasion

00:13:08.660 as our best word for this,

00:13:11.720 because it feels a little racist-y.

00:13:16.600 Even though I know

00:13:17.320 that's not really the central theme,

00:13:20.740 it does have that problem,

00:13:22.520 because it's a little too hyperbolic to me.

00:13:26.120 But I don't know of a better word.

00:13:28.360 Replacement.

00:13:29.460 No, I don't think it's replacement.

00:13:32.020 Yeah, incursion, invasion.

00:13:35.500 Yeah.

00:13:37.520 You know,

00:13:38.060 it's almost like

00:13:38.820 too much of a good thing.

00:13:41.540 You know,

00:13:42.280 if you wanted to argue,

00:13:43.200 if you wanted to argue

00:13:44.360 against Democrats,

00:13:46.200 who are willing to say

00:13:48.360 that immigration is a good thing,

00:13:50.440 and most of us would agree

00:13:51.500 at some level it's a good thing,

00:13:53.060 and at some kind of control

00:13:55.540 it's a good thing.

00:13:57.300 But I feel like maybe,

00:13:59.140 I'm just noodling here,

00:14:00.080 I'm just thinking out loud.

00:14:01.400 If you were going to argue

00:14:02.400 with somebody who is,

00:14:04.200 let's say,

00:14:04.840 more pro-open borders than you,

00:14:08.360 I would think

00:14:09.180 the strongest argument

00:14:10.200 would say this.

00:14:12.680 Immigration is good,

00:14:14.140 but too much of a good thing

00:14:15.460 is bad.

00:14:17.500 And we're at the

00:14:18.920 too much of a good thing,

00:14:21.060 bad stage.

00:14:23.700 That puts more of a positive spin on it.

00:14:26.800 It's like ice cream.

00:14:28.320 Ice cream's fine

00:14:29.200 if you just have it once in a while.

00:14:30.560 If you eat two tubs of it a night,

00:14:34.540 way too much.

00:14:35.780 It's too much.

00:14:37.700 So, I don't know.

00:14:38.640 I don't like the words

00:14:39.520 we're using on this,

00:14:40.460 because sometimes the words

00:14:41.740 end up driving your policy.

00:14:44.460 So if your word

00:14:45.240 is a little imprecise,

00:14:47.080 you might end up with a policy

00:14:48.580 that's a little imprecise.

00:14:50.120 And I feel like

00:14:50.840 we've got to get this right.

00:14:52.640 With my framing,

00:14:54.180 my framing is,

00:14:55.020 immigration's good,

00:14:55.880 but too much of a good thing

00:14:57.880 is bad, right?

00:14:59.140 You can die from

00:14:59.900 drinking too much water.

00:15:01.560 Did you know that?

00:15:03.220 Literally,

00:15:03.780 if you drink too much water,

00:15:05.580 you can die.

00:15:06.660 There's an economist

00:15:07.360 who just tell us

00:15:08.760 how many people to let in

00:15:09.900 and how many to die.

00:15:12.720 And then we follow that

00:15:14.160 until things change,

00:15:15.780 and then we adjust it.

00:15:17.320 So I'm amazed

00:15:18.340 that somebody like Vivek

00:15:20.000 hasn't suggested that.

00:15:23.120 Doesn't that mean like

00:15:23.920 an obvious thing

00:15:25.560 that somebody like him

00:15:26.480 would come up with?

00:15:28.960 Am I wrong?

00:15:30.640 Because it's the high ground,

00:15:32.920 the high ground play

00:15:34.460 is that none of us citizens

00:15:37.620 know the right number.

00:15:39.360 That's the high ground.

00:15:40.540 I don't know the right number.

00:15:42.340 I think there's some number

00:15:43.440 of immigration that's good,

00:15:45.220 and then beyond that,

00:15:46.200 it's bad.

00:15:46.980 But I don't know

00:15:47.540 what that number is.

00:15:48.360 I'd rather experts

00:15:49.660 kind of massage it

00:15:52.060 and play with it

00:15:52.760 and adjust it

00:15:53.580 and see if they can come up

00:15:56.200 with something over time.

00:15:57.600 On day one,

00:15:58.320 maybe it's a bad guess.

00:16:00.180 But maybe over time

00:16:01.220 we figure it out,

00:16:02.380 how to manage that doorway

00:16:04.900 a little better.

00:16:07.400 Anyway,

00:16:07.980 I think this whole

00:16:08.880 immigration thing

00:16:09.740 could be turned

00:16:10.280 into a positive

00:16:11.040 if we frame it as

00:16:13.420 immigration is good,

00:16:14.800 but too much of a good thing

00:16:16.180 could kill you.

00:16:17.200 So we need a group of people,

00:16:21.220 experts, economists,

00:16:22.260 to tell us how many employees

00:16:24.840 we need that we're short of.

00:16:28.000 Too far?

00:16:29.660 Somebody says too far.

00:16:32.160 Yeah, that's going to be

00:16:33.020 my rallying cry

00:16:34.060 for stuff that's too far.

00:16:36.540 It's just too far.

00:16:38.200 All right.

00:16:39.380 Let's talk about Putin.

00:16:40.880 So I saw an interesting,

00:16:43.560 let's say,

00:16:45.840 hypothesis,

00:16:46.840 might have been on

00:16:47.600 one of the news shows,

00:16:49.080 CNN maybe,

00:16:50.100 where there was somebody

00:16:51.420 suggesting that

00:16:52.600 the battle between

00:16:54.980 Purgosian

00:16:55.800 and the

00:16:56.880 Ministry of Defense,

00:16:58.660 where Purgosian

00:16:59.540 was saying

00:17:00.220 the Wagner Group

00:17:00.940 is going to

00:17:01.760 pull out,

00:17:02.500 we're going to pull out

00:17:03.300 if we don't get more ammo,

00:17:05.100 because the Ministry of Defense

00:17:06.260 is hogging it.

00:17:07.120 And apparently

00:17:08.660 he's changed his mind,

00:17:09.780 because he's promised

00:17:10.660 more ammo.

00:17:13.380 So who knows

00:17:14.380 if that's over.

00:17:15.520 But maybe,

00:17:16.240 so maybe it was nothing

00:17:17.280 but good negotiating.

00:17:19.960 And the Wagner guy

00:17:21.280 knew he was indispensable

00:17:22.560 at the moment,

00:17:23.760 so he could negotiate hard.

00:17:26.440 That's probably what

00:17:27.520 made him

00:17:28.300 an important person

00:17:29.880 over there,

00:17:30.380 is that he negotiates hard.

00:17:32.180 So maybe it was just that.

00:17:33.640 He was just negotiating

00:17:34.480 to get more ammo.

00:17:35.200 But others are suggesting

00:17:38.100 that Putin

00:17:40.360 is letting his

00:17:41.920 oligarchs and generals

00:17:43.640 fight it out,

00:17:45.300 so that he becomes

00:17:46.600 sort of away from the fray.

00:17:48.900 So he'll let the,

00:17:49.860 you know,

00:17:50.460 the underlings

00:17:51.720 battle it out

00:17:53.320 a little bit in public,

00:17:54.880 and just sees

00:17:56.740 where it ends up.

00:17:58.120 That doesn't feel right to me.

00:18:00.720 Does that sound like

00:18:01.780 a real thing

00:18:02.500 that Putin would be doing?

00:18:04.000 We can't read his mind.

00:18:05.200 Right?

00:18:05.920 Can't read his mind.

00:18:06.940 But it doesn't feel

00:18:08.220 like something he would do.

00:18:10.180 Because he has the power

00:18:11.380 to tell them to shut up.

00:18:13.820 If you have the power

00:18:14.920 to tell people to shut up,

00:18:17.220 and if they don't shut up,

00:18:18.900 it makes your country

00:18:19.680 look like it's in conflict,

00:18:21.520 I don't understand

00:18:23.280 letting them do it.

00:18:25.640 It only makes sense

00:18:26.860 if he couldn't stop them.

00:18:29.580 Would you agree?

00:18:31.360 It makes far more sense

00:18:32.860 that they're doing it

00:18:33.680 despite Putin

00:18:34.700 not liking it.

00:18:36.400 Like,

00:18:36.720 there's something

00:18:37.200 deeper than that.

00:18:38.380 I'm not buying the

00:18:39.480 Putin likes his people

00:18:40.900 to fight in public.

00:18:42.220 That doesn't feel real.

00:18:44.580 But I'll put it out there.

00:18:46.180 Somebody said it.

00:18:47.640 All right.

00:18:49.180 Then there's another oligarch

00:18:50.700 who made some news

00:18:51.760 very directly

00:18:53.120 criticizing the war.

00:18:54.980 Right?

00:18:55.120 He wasn't pulling any punches.

00:18:58.040 Just bad war,

00:18:59.120 bad decision.

00:19:00.620 You know,

00:19:00.800 we shouldn't be there.

00:19:02.280 So,

00:19:03.500 is that oligarch

00:19:04.960 going to disappear?

00:19:06.520 Or is there,

00:19:07.320 like,

00:19:07.620 a beginning of a crack

00:19:09.060 in the unity?

00:19:12.020 I think it's too soon.

00:19:14.600 Too soon to know

00:19:15.800 if there's any kind

00:19:16.480 of an oligarch

00:19:17.980 trend happening.

00:19:19.440 But one thing

00:19:20.340 that does seem clear

00:19:21.240 is that the oligarchs

00:19:22.720 are seeing it's not

00:19:23.420 working in their favor.

00:19:25.120 I don't believe

00:19:26.160 there are too many oligarchs

00:19:27.360 who are saying,

00:19:28.420 ooh,

00:19:28.740 I can't wait

00:19:29.260 until we capture

00:19:30.040 those regions

00:19:32.220 within Ukraine

00:19:33.500 because I'm going

00:19:34.680 to make some money then.

00:19:36.120 I think the oligarchs

00:19:37.460 see it as all bad.

00:19:39.120 Meaning they already

00:19:40.120 have a good situation.

00:19:41.560 They're oligarchs.

00:19:43.020 The only thing

00:19:43.680 they need to continue

00:19:44.560 being happy

00:19:45.160 is for Russia's economy

00:19:47.220 and standing in the world

00:19:48.540 to not degrade

00:19:50.560 because they'd like

00:19:51.600 to travel.

00:19:52.800 Imagine being this,

00:19:53.740 like,

00:19:54.180 richest guy in the world

00:19:55.100 one of the oligarchs.

00:19:58.080 You're a Russian

00:19:58.800 with just billions

00:19:59.600 and billions of dollars.

00:20:00.780 The world is your

00:20:01.680 playground.

00:20:03.760 And then you're not

00:20:04.720 allowed to leave Russia.

00:20:07.520 That would really suck

00:20:08.980 for an oligarch.

00:20:10.580 They've got their

00:20:11.040 private planes,

00:20:12.060 they want to go places.

00:20:13.640 Get out of Russia.

00:20:15.180 So,

00:20:15.940 I think there might be

00:20:17.880 more oligarch pressure

00:20:19.520 on Putin than we can see

00:20:22.860 from the outside.

00:20:24.320 I would think the oligarchs

00:20:25.680 would be solidly

00:20:27.140 against the war

00:20:28.020 by now.

00:20:29.220 What do you think?

00:20:31.140 Of course,

00:20:31.900 there'll be exceptions.

00:20:33.000 But wouldn't you say

00:20:33.700 that mostly the oligarchs

00:20:35.120 would be against the war

00:20:36.380 at this point

00:20:36.960 and would rather

00:20:37.540 just wind it down

00:20:38.440 no matter what happens?

00:20:40.600 These special operations,

00:20:41.980 I should say,

00:20:42.520 not a war.

00:20:43.180 Not if they're profiting.

00:20:47.980 Well,

00:20:48.280 I suspect most of the oligarchs

00:20:50.260 are losing money

00:20:51.000 and not profiting.

00:20:52.280 Because the oligarchs

00:20:53.380 are being named by name.

00:20:55.440 Right?

00:20:55.860 And some of their assets

00:20:56.760 are being frozen

00:20:57.520 and they can't get chips

00:20:59.400 to make stuff.

00:21:01.620 I don't know.

00:21:02.940 So I think maybe

00:21:03.720 that's the game

00:21:05.060 within the game

00:21:05.720 is the oligarchs

00:21:06.640 trying to work Putin

00:21:08.860 to end it.

00:21:11.880 Well,

00:21:12.360 Washington Post

00:21:13.920 is blaming

00:21:16.900 I don't know

00:21:19.480 what's true here.

00:21:21.260 So I've told you

00:21:22.220 before that

00:21:22.900 I'm going to

00:21:23.620 intentionally ignore

00:21:25.020 the mass shootings.

00:21:27.840 And I ignore them

00:21:28.920 so hard

00:21:29.340 I can't even tell

00:21:30.040 which one we're

00:21:30.600 talking about anymore.

00:21:32.220 I'll look at the news

00:21:33.220 and it'll be

00:21:33.600 blah, blah,

00:21:34.320 mass shooting.

00:21:35.600 And I can't tell

00:21:36.580 if it's a new one

00:21:37.720 or the one

00:21:38.660 that just happened

00:21:39.400 or it's the one

00:21:40.280 before the one before.

00:21:42.360 I don't know.

00:21:42.680 I just know

00:21:43.060 there's lots of

00:21:43.580 mass shootings.

00:21:45.700 And there will be

00:21:46.520 a lot more.

00:21:48.320 I think I've told you

00:21:49.520 this before.

00:21:50.720 Every signal

00:21:51.700 in society

00:21:52.620 is sending the message

00:21:54.040 oh, there's going to be

00:21:55.200 a lot more mass shootings.

00:21:56.980 A lot more.

00:21:58.380 Because the

00:21:59.040 things that cause it

00:22:00.700 are young men

00:22:01.760 who don't have

00:22:02.520 a better direction.

00:22:04.900 And we have

00:22:05.580 the highest number

00:22:06.440 of young men

00:22:07.140 without a good direction

00:22:08.200 of all time.

00:22:08.860 Then you've got

00:22:09.980 your mental illness

00:22:10.840 seems to be

00:22:11.680 at an all time high.

00:22:13.080 You've got your

00:22:13.640 drug use

00:22:14.360 seems to be

00:22:15.140 at an all time high.

00:22:16.660 And then you've got

00:22:17.520 your media

00:22:18.600 getting people

00:22:19.260 all worked up.

00:22:21.020 Social media too

00:22:22.040 seems to be

00:22:22.840 at an all time high.

00:22:24.400 And we have

00:22:25.340 fewer

00:22:26.420 positive paths

00:22:28.760 for young men.

00:22:30.620 So the young men

00:22:31.560 are not going out there

00:22:32.420 and just slaying it

00:22:33.420 with the young women

00:22:34.180 and starting families.

00:22:35.280 They just don't feel

00:22:35.980 they have options.

00:22:36.640 So if you have

00:22:38.440 that many young men

00:22:39.620 without direction

00:22:40.460 and you have

00:22:41.820 a country full

00:22:42.600 of easy access

00:22:43.460 to guns

00:22:44.060 there's only one

00:22:45.520 way this goes.

00:22:47.340 There's going to be

00:22:48.120 a whole lot more

00:22:49.160 mass shootings

00:22:50.020 and there's nothing

00:22:50.780 that you can do

00:22:51.320 about it.

00:22:53.100 I mean you can do

00:22:54.080 a good guy with a gun

00:22:55.340 you can do a little

00:22:56.100 stuff around the edges

00:22:57.020 but we have a

00:22:58.480 social situation

00:22:59.800 that guarantees it.

00:23:01.720 As long as the

00:23:02.800 basic social situation

00:23:04.180 exists

00:23:04.740 there's just

00:23:06.680 going to be

00:23:06.960 more of it.

00:23:08.100 I would just

00:23:08.720 stay away from

00:23:09.260 crowds

00:23:09.720 frankly.

00:23:11.460 That's my strategy.

00:23:14.560 Alright.

00:23:18.900 So let's get

00:23:19.940 here's an update

00:23:20.560 on Bud Light.

00:23:21.740 I've been fascinated

00:23:22.700 as much by how

00:23:23.820 the Anheuser-Busch

00:23:25.280 handles the crisis.

00:23:28.220 So we still don't know

00:23:29.440 if there's any

00:23:29.980 permanent damage

00:23:31.740 because the Bud Light

00:23:32.960 pushback to the

00:23:34.520 Dylan Mulvaney

00:23:35.300 as an influencer

00:23:36.820 situation.

00:23:38.300 And so the only

00:23:40.020 thing that was

00:23:40.820 affected was

00:23:41.660 one brand.

00:23:43.820 So Anheuser-Busch

00:23:44.640 actually had a

00:23:45.300 pretty good quarter

00:23:46.080 if you don't count

00:23:47.540 that Bud Light

00:23:48.200 went down 25%

00:23:49.380 because of this.

00:23:50.660 Now they don't know

00:23:51.380 if it'll stay down

00:23:52.120 25%.

00:23:53.140 I have a feeling

00:23:54.780 it will.

00:23:56.120 This one has a

00:23:57.760 feeling like it's

00:24:00.000 going to last

00:24:00.680 because everybody

00:24:01.800 heard of it

00:24:02.400 and everybody

00:24:03.400 has the same

00:24:03.920 feeling later.

00:24:06.240 So people will

00:24:07.100 develop a new

00:24:07.700 habit and the

00:24:08.660 new habit

00:24:09.100 probably has

00:24:09.880 now excluded

00:24:11.040 Bud Light.

00:24:12.300 So that's a big

00:24:13.300 deal.

00:24:14.240 So what they did

00:24:14.860 was Anheuser-Busch

00:24:16.460 first of all

00:24:17.180 they reassigned

00:24:18.140 or got rid of

00:24:18.780 two executives

00:24:19.520 and that didn't

00:24:21.460 seem to be enough.

00:24:23.160 So now they're

00:24:23.840 blaming their

00:24:24.520 ad agency

00:24:25.820 but they're not

00:24:26.820 naming the ad

00:24:27.500 agency.

00:24:29.200 How would you

00:24:29.940 like to be the

00:24:30.740 ad agency

00:24:31.480 that recommended

00:24:32.860 that?

00:24:35.540 How would you

00:24:36.300 like to be the

00:24:36.900 one that

00:24:37.220 recommended?

00:24:37.740 How do you

00:24:38.260 ever get another

00:24:39.000 job?

00:24:40.540 Well what kind

00:24:41.420 of work did you

00:24:42.100 do before?

00:24:43.340 Well we were

00:24:45.440 behind the Bud

00:24:46.740 Light promotion.

00:24:49.560 It's a little

00:24:50.220 tough to market

00:24:50.860 yourself after

00:24:51.520 that.

00:24:52.940 But Anheuser-Busch

00:24:54.360 quite wisely is

00:24:55.700 trying to throw

00:24:56.520 the ad agency

00:24:57.260 under the bus

00:24:58.020 despite the fact

00:24:59.860 that anything

00:25:00.940 the ad agency

00:25:01.800 suggested was

00:25:03.640 approved by

00:25:04.840 an Anheuser-Busch

00:25:08.040 executive.

00:25:09.700 I'm not sure

00:25:10.860 that blaming

00:25:11.480 the ad agency

00:25:12.500 is on point

00:25:15.020 because ad

00:25:16.260 agencies are

00:25:17.000 supposed to give

00:25:17.500 you a few

00:25:17.940 different looks

00:25:18.680 right?

00:25:19.700 They don't give

00:25:20.300 you one idea

00:25:21.240 do they?

00:25:23.220 Don't they give

00:25:23.780 you a whole variety

00:25:24.600 of ideas and then

00:25:25.500 you as the

00:25:25.980 executive pick the

00:25:26.900 good one?

00:25:28.060 So I feel it's

00:25:29.200 a little bit

00:25:30.860 unfair to blame

00:25:32.620 the ad agency.

00:25:33.840 A little bit

00:25:34.420 unfair.

00:25:36.580 But I'd have to

00:25:37.480 know how hard

00:25:38.040 they pushed.

00:25:39.580 If they really

00:25:40.480 pushed this

00:25:41.360 you know the

00:25:42.220 Dylan Mulvaney

00:25:42.920 thing and

00:25:44.020 then you know

00:25:45.540 Anheuser-Busch

00:25:46.240 executive agreed

00:25:48.360 to it that's

00:25:49.900 still two people

00:25:50.660 making a mistake

00:25:51.460 but you can see

00:25:52.660 why the ad agency

00:25:53.480 would be a little

00:25:54.740 more guilty if

00:25:55.980 they pushed it

00:25:56.580 hard.

00:25:57.360 But we don't

00:25:57.760 know that.

00:25:58.700 We don't know

00:25:59.120 if they pushed

00:25:59.560 it hard or

00:26:00.100 it's just one

00:26:00.540 of the things

00:26:00.940 they suggested

00:26:01.560 in a list of

00:26:02.740 lots of things.

00:26:06.480 Alright.

00:26:10.940 Here's an

00:26:11.460 interesting story

00:26:12.480 that I wasn't

00:26:13.020 aware of.

00:26:13.920 Are you all

00:26:14.420 aware of RFK

00:26:15.500 Jr.'s past

00:26:17.640 wildlife which

00:26:19.440 apparently includes

00:26:20.420 lots of

00:26:20.900 womanizing while

00:26:22.820 previously married

00:26:23.880 and a whole

00:26:25.340 bunch of

00:26:25.660 drugs.

00:26:27.900 So at one

00:26:28.600 point he did

00:26:29.120 heroin

00:26:29.500 and you know

00:26:31.860 psychedelics and

00:26:33.840 marijuana

00:26:34.400 probably assumed

00:26:35.920 drinking.

00:26:37.540 And the story

00:26:38.740 is that he is

00:26:39.520 now off of

00:26:41.100 everything right.

00:26:42.980 So at the

00:26:43.900 moment I would

00:26:44.520 assume he's not

00:26:45.120 drinking either

00:26:45.820 because if you're

00:26:46.340 an addict you

00:26:46.880 can't drink.

00:26:49.660 Allegedly.

00:26:50.140 Now I have

00:26:52.600 mixed feelings

00:26:53.320 about this.

00:26:54.400 I have mixed

00:26:54.700 feelings.

00:26:55.520 As you know

00:26:56.200 my single issue

00:26:58.220 this time is

00:26:58.920 going to be

00:26:59.220 fentanyl and

00:27:00.700 I'm not sure

00:27:01.400 that that's bad

00:27:02.460 to have an

00:27:03.800 ex-addict who

00:27:05.780 would be in

00:27:06.240 charge of the

00:27:06.920 policies about

00:27:08.580 fentanyl.

00:27:09.820 Is that good

00:27:10.500 or bad?

00:27:12.180 See I trust

00:27:13.560 that he won't

00:27:14.360 be abusing

00:27:15.860 substances if he

00:27:17.060 were president

00:27:17.580 because the

00:27:18.700 president gets

00:27:19.240 watched pretty

00:27:19.820 closely.

00:27:20.460 So I would

00:27:21.540 guess that you

00:27:22.800 know you could

00:27:23.200 expect him to

00:27:24.260 be clean in

00:27:24.920 office.

00:27:29.900 But would you

00:27:32.240 rather have

00:27:32.740 somebody who

00:27:33.260 really understands

00:27:34.420 addiction working

00:27:36.180 on addiction or

00:27:37.460 somebody who's

00:27:38.000 never had a

00:27:38.540 drink?

00:27:40.840 I feel like

00:27:42.020 his experience

00:27:44.160 might have an

00:27:44.900 advantage.

00:27:46.540 Because the

00:27:47.760 part that we

00:27:48.320 always overlook

00:27:49.340 look, I like

00:27:51.000 to say we

00:27:51.720 should go hard

00:27:52.240 against the

00:27:52.720 cartels.

00:27:53.860 But I also

00:27:55.980 know it's not

00:27:56.520 enough.

00:27:57.980 You could take

00:27:58.640 out the cartels

00:27:59.440 tomorrow and

00:28:00.060 it would be

00:28:00.300 replaced with

00:28:00.900 some other

00:28:01.300 criminal element.

00:28:02.700 So people are

00:28:03.440 still going to

00:28:03.860 get their

00:28:04.140 fentanyl.

00:28:06.120 Which is not a

00:28:07.060 reason to not

00:28:08.360 attack the

00:28:08.900 cartels because

00:28:10.120 they are sending

00:28:10.680 death into our

00:28:11.380 country.

00:28:11.780 So you do

00:28:12.740 need to take

00:28:13.860 care of business.

00:28:15.460 But maybe you

00:28:16.900 need somebody who

00:28:17.620 has been there

00:28:18.300 and felt it and

00:28:19.720 knows how strong

00:28:21.060 it is to suggest

00:28:22.940 a workaround.

00:28:23.940 Now my workaround

00:28:24.840 is the only one

00:28:25.880 that I think can

00:28:26.480 work, which is to

00:28:27.920 build cities from

00:28:29.800 scratch that just

00:28:31.520 don't have any

00:28:32.300 access in or out

00:28:33.440 for any drugs.

00:28:35.440 Now it might still

00:28:36.340 get shipped in,

00:28:37.160 but as soon as

00:28:37.680 somebody within that

00:28:38.500 city tests positive

00:28:40.700 for drugs, you move

00:28:41.620 them out of the

00:28:42.160 city.

00:28:42.400 You have to

00:28:44.240 expel them from

00:28:44.960 the city the

00:28:45.580 moment there's a

00:28:46.280 drug there.

00:28:47.500 There could be

00:28:47.860 no, you know,

00:28:49.260 that can't be

00:28:49.740 negotiable.

00:28:50.880 But yeah, you

00:28:51.360 need some kind of

00:28:51.960 a gated city where

00:28:53.080 you can just put

00:28:53.680 all of the people

00:28:54.460 who have the same

00:28:54.940 problem, but that

00:28:56.380 they can live a

00:28:57.320 quality life while

00:28:59.720 they're there, and

00:29:01.040 then anytime they

00:29:01.740 want to leave, or

00:29:03.580 let's say, you

00:29:04.320 know, maybe there's

00:29:05.220 a period where they

00:29:05.900 have to be there

00:29:06.540 for a month or

00:29:07.120 something, depending

00:29:08.120 if there was a

00:29:08.780 crime involved.

00:29:09.520 But they should

00:29:12.300 have a way out,

00:29:13.740 right?

00:29:14.060 They should be

00:29:14.560 able to get dry

00:29:15.280 for X amount of

00:29:16.440 weeks, and that

00:29:17.760 should be enough

00:29:18.260 for them to get

00:29:18.760 out if they want

00:29:19.400 to.

00:29:20.220 So I wouldn't

00:29:20.900 call it a prison

00:29:21.580 city, because you

00:29:22.600 could build the

00:29:24.060 city at a higher

00:29:25.800 lifestyle than

00:29:26.560 they're experiencing

00:29:27.520 right now.

00:29:29.120 You know, it could

00:29:29.620 be a good lifestyle

00:29:30.480 if you build it

00:29:31.040 from scratch.

00:29:33.340 Yeah, let's call

00:29:34.080 it a recovery

00:29:34.640 city.

00:29:36.520 I like that,

00:29:37.380 recovery city.

00:29:38.180 That's not bad.

00:29:42.080 Yeah, it wouldn't

00:29:42.780 be a gulag, because

00:29:43.880 it would be only

00:29:45.600 mandatory for a

00:29:47.160 small number of

00:29:47.820 people who had

00:29:49.220 perhaps, you

00:29:50.880 know, violated an

00:29:51.800 actual crime.

00:29:54.480 Detoxity.

00:29:55.460 Oh, that's not

00:29:56.000 bad.

00:29:57.220 Detoxity.

00:29:59.180 Ah, I like it.

00:30:02.420 Rehabopolis.

00:30:06.460 New Oakland.

00:30:07.300 New Oakland.

00:30:09.460 That's funny.

00:30:11.100 All right, well,

00:30:11.580 Matt Walsh is trying

00:30:13.100 to get into extra

00:30:13.980 trouble, because I

00:30:15.240 guess he didn't get

00:30:15.860 into enough trouble

00:30:16.820 with his opinions on

00:30:18.280 the trans community.

00:30:20.240 So now he's got an

00:30:21.680 opinion piece about

00:30:22.780 why there's one word

00:30:25.460 that people are not

00:30:28.380 allowed to use,

00:30:29.620 unless they're black,

00:30:30.900 which would be the

00:30:31.620 N-word.

00:30:32.000 word, and he

00:30:33.420 argues, you know,

00:30:36.120 why is it that it's

00:30:37.260 insane that there's

00:30:38.020 one word that you

00:30:38.780 can't use in any

00:30:39.640 context?

00:30:40.520 Now, he's not

00:30:41.120 arguing, he's not

00:30:42.800 arguing using the

00:30:44.500 word in casual

00:30:45.320 conversation.

00:30:46.520 He's just saying that

00:30:47.540 is there no situation

00:30:49.480 where you could talk

00:30:50.380 about the word?

00:30:52.660 You can't even say

00:30:53.860 somebody used this

00:30:55.180 word.

00:30:55.940 You have to say N-word,

00:30:57.120 and as he points

00:30:58.100 out, N-word means

00:30:59.520 exactly the same.

00:31:01.640 So it's weird, and

00:31:02.380 you think the other

00:31:03.140 word as soon as you

00:31:03.820 hear N-word.

00:31:04.680 So it's just sort of

00:31:06.040 a crazy, insane

00:31:07.300 situation.

00:31:09.120 Here's my opinion.

00:31:11.720 It's just one word.

00:31:14.180 It's just one word.

00:31:16.520 I don't know that

00:31:17.500 that's like the

00:31:18.600 beginning of some

00:31:19.320 slippery slope,

00:31:20.900 because, you know,

00:31:22.140 it's been decades

00:31:23.280 when that word was,

00:31:24.760 you know, not right

00:31:26.180 for polite company,

00:31:27.600 but I don't think

00:31:28.920 things were slipping

00:31:29.720 because of that

00:31:30.480 one word, right?

00:31:32.980 I also say that

00:31:34.280 there are some

00:31:35.760 things which you

00:31:36.500 should not

00:31:37.040 analogize to.

00:31:40.500 For example,

00:31:41.560 the Holocaust.

00:31:43.140 It wasn't anything

00:31:43.940 quite like it,

00:31:45.320 or slavery in

00:31:46.340 America.

00:31:47.380 Nothing really

00:31:48.100 was like that,

00:31:49.760 or whatever

00:31:52.240 the settlers did

00:31:53.880 to the Native

00:31:54.580 Americans.

00:31:56.180 It wasn't anything

00:31:56.900 exactly like that,

00:31:58.380 so it's hard to

00:31:59.100 compare anything to

00:31:59.760 it.

00:32:00.160 So this word is

00:32:01.240 the same.

00:32:02.500 There's nothing

00:32:03.160 like that word,

00:32:04.680 because there's

00:32:05.140 nothing like

00:32:05.760 American slavery,

00:32:06.920 at least in the

00:32:07.500 American experience.

00:32:09.820 So I don't mind

00:32:11.300 if somebody has a

00:32:12.260 word that is

00:32:13.940 out of bounds.

00:32:15.100 Just one word.

00:32:17.020 No big deal to me.

00:32:18.300 I do think that

00:32:22.540 you shouldn't go to

00:32:23.220 jail and get

00:32:23.760 canceled if you

00:32:24.660 use it in the

00:32:25.400 context of talking

00:32:26.340 about it.

00:32:29.200 Now, as

00:32:30.780 somebody would

00:32:31.220 say, white

00:32:33.200 people can be

00:32:33.860 called crackers,

00:32:35.340 and usually we

00:32:36.160 just laugh at it.

00:32:37.520 I do.

00:32:38.320 I laugh every time

00:32:39.320 I hear somebody

00:32:39.800 call me a

00:32:40.280 cracker.

00:32:41.280 I don't know if

00:32:41.840 it's because the

00:32:42.540 word is funny.

00:32:43.460 Now, I would

00:32:47.020 argue that the

00:32:48.260 people who are

00:32:48.780 not bothered by

00:32:49.580 words have an

00:32:50.500 advantage over

00:32:51.680 people who are.

00:32:53.940 If you were to

00:32:55.160 check back in a

00:32:56.080 few years, the

00:32:56.740 people who are

00:32:57.220 not bothered by

00:32:58.000 words probably do

00:32:58.840 better than the

00:33:00.200 people who are

00:33:00.720 out of bounds

00:33:01.180 in words, because

00:33:02.140 that would be the

00:33:02.620 least important

00:33:03.160 thing you could

00:33:03.620 do.

00:33:04.920 But, hey, I

00:33:06.760 also like people

00:33:07.380 to feel comfortable.

00:33:09.440 And, you know,

00:33:10.100 there's a reason I

00:33:11.380 don't use the C

00:33:12.180 word.

00:33:13.460 In mixed

00:33:14.900 company where I

00:33:15.620 don't know

00:33:15.940 everybody, I

00:33:18.160 would definitely

00:33:18.560 use it privately.

00:33:19.640 But I wouldn't

00:33:20.320 use it in mixed

00:33:21.700 company if I

00:33:22.400 didn't know the

00:33:22.920 crowd, right?

00:33:24.520 So it's not a

00:33:25.440 big deal to, you

00:33:27.200 know, censor

00:33:27.780 yourself if

00:33:29.600 something is,

00:33:31.100 somebody says

00:33:31.860 cracker is a

00:33:32.620 horrible insult.

00:33:34.200 How many of you

00:33:34.960 are white people

00:33:36.120 who would be

00:33:36.540 insulted by the

00:33:37.420 word cracker?

00:33:41.360 Anybody?

00:33:43.460 To me, it's one

00:33:44.880 of the funniest

00:33:45.360 words.

00:33:46.880 It just sounds

00:33:47.680 funny.

00:33:48.620 Cracker.

00:33:51.440 No, none of

00:33:52.280 you are offended,

00:33:53.220 right?

00:33:54.320 I don't think so.

00:33:56.900 Anyway, I'm

00:33:58.540 going to say that

00:33:59.240 I completely see

00:34:00.680 Matt Walsh's

00:34:01.440 point, but I

00:34:03.040 don't think it's

00:34:03.520 important.

00:34:05.220 It's just the

00:34:05.980 least important

00:34:06.560 thing to talk

00:34:07.140 about.

00:34:07.360 I wouldn't

00:34:09.380 personally use

00:34:09.980 the word because

00:34:10.900 I find it, to

00:34:12.740 me, it's one of

00:34:13.280 the very few

00:34:13.920 words where you

00:34:16.400 can actually, it

00:34:17.360 makes your body

00:34:18.040 feel bad.

00:34:18.780 I talked about

00:34:19.360 writing humor.

00:34:20.820 When you write

00:34:21.340 humor, you use

00:34:22.180 your body to

00:34:23.840 judge whether

00:34:24.460 something worked.

00:34:26.000 Like if you

00:34:26.560 laugh, oh, your

00:34:27.440 body did that.

00:34:28.580 You didn't decide

00:34:29.320 to laugh, you

00:34:29.880 just laughed.

00:34:30.740 Your body

00:34:31.220 actually reacted.

00:34:32.380 So that's how I

00:34:33.060 judge my writing,

00:34:34.280 is by my body.

00:34:35.380 But that word,

00:34:36.700 the n-word, even

00:34:39.880 the thought of

00:34:41.000 the word, gives

00:34:42.900 me a bad body

00:34:43.840 feel.

00:34:44.980 Does anybody

00:34:45.420 else get that?

00:34:46.800 It might be a

00:34:47.400 writer thing.

00:34:48.380 Because the word

00:34:49.080 itself has an

00:34:50.180 ugliness to it

00:34:51.260 that does

00:34:52.500 transcend almost

00:34:55.380 any word I can

00:34:56.080 think of.

00:34:58.560 The other word

00:34:59.800 that has that

00:35:00.460 quality to it is

00:35:01.700 rape.

00:35:04.020 I don't like to

00:35:05.060 use the r-word

00:35:05.880 because there's

00:35:08.300 a physical

00:35:08.860 feeling to it

00:35:09.660 that's just

00:35:10.320 really negative.

00:35:11.880 Like you can

00:35:12.620 just feel the

00:35:13.300 weight of the

00:35:13.780 word.

00:35:14.800 So the n-word

00:35:15.400 does that to

00:35:15.960 me.

00:35:16.120 There's like a

00:35:16.740 disgust, just

00:35:18.460 like a natural

00:35:19.180 physical disgust

00:35:20.740 when I even

00:35:21.560 think of it.

00:35:22.780 Now, I don't

00:35:23.340 get that disgust

00:35:24.600 when black people

00:35:25.880 are using it,

00:35:26.540 right?

00:35:27.080 But I think of

00:35:27.960 it just as a

00:35:28.640 word.

00:35:29.120 It's just like

00:35:29.620 an ugly word.

00:35:32.020 And there are

00:35:32.580 other ones like

00:35:33.120 that.

00:35:36.260 Paul Graham.

00:35:40.340 So Paul

00:35:41.040 Graham, famous

00:35:42.060 investor type,

00:35:43.520 very good

00:35:44.100 follow, says

00:35:44.960 lots of wise

00:35:45.560 things.

00:35:46.540 I would put

00:35:47.240 him in the

00:35:47.760 internet dad

00:35:48.540 category of

00:35:50.000 people who

00:35:50.400 are just

00:35:50.720 trying to

00:35:52.040 make sure

00:35:52.400 that we

00:35:52.680 don't get

00:35:53.020 too crazy.

00:35:55.660 And he

00:35:56.540 tweeted this

00:35:57.320 provocatively.

00:35:58.920 he said that

00:36:00.580 men commit

00:36:01.160 95% of

00:36:02.140 homicides.

00:36:03.060 I don't

00:36:03.800 consider it a

00:36:04.480 slander if

00:36:05.180 someone says

00:36:05.720 men are

00:36:06.280 inherently more

00:36:07.120 violent.

00:36:08.020 It seems

00:36:08.480 obviously true.

00:36:10.060 Now, when I

00:36:10.780 read that, I

00:36:11.320 said to myself

00:36:11.980 two things.

00:36:13.060 Number one,

00:36:13.760 okay, that is

00:36:15.120 100% obviously

00:36:16.500 true, that men

00:36:17.840 are doing most

00:36:18.880 of the homicides,

00:36:20.140 and that everybody

00:36:21.320 can see it, and

00:36:22.700 it shouldn't be

00:36:23.460 like a big

00:36:25.020 problem if you

00:36:25.900 point it out.

00:36:26.440 Well, what do

00:36:28.380 you think people

00:36:28.920 said?

00:36:30.200 They had a big

00:36:30.880 problem with it.

00:36:33.120 I can't think of

00:36:34.140 anything that

00:36:34.780 would be more

00:36:35.400 obvious and

00:36:38.400 true, that men

00:36:39.940 are the ones

00:36:40.400 creating most of

00:36:41.240 the murders.

00:36:43.000 And yet, there

00:36:43.940 was pushback.

00:36:45.460 There was

00:36:45.800 pushback.

00:36:47.320 Now, here's

00:36:49.880 what you're

00:36:50.260 wondering.

00:36:52.220 Is this the

00:36:53.160 first sort of

00:36:55.080 the platform

00:36:55.840 tweet that's

00:36:58.340 making you ask

00:36:59.200 the question

00:36:59.800 about crime

00:37:02.560 differences by

00:37:03.360 ethnicity?

00:37:05.100 Now, if he

00:37:05.860 can say that

00:37:06.560 men are

00:37:07.080 obviously more

00:37:08.740 murderous than

00:37:09.480 women, how

00:37:12.200 close is that

00:37:12.940 to saying,

00:37:13.480 well, and

00:37:14.040 there's this

00:37:14.540 ethnic group

00:37:15.260 that seems to

00:37:16.440 have a high

00:37:16.860 murder rate,

00:37:17.540 too?

00:37:19.360 Are we going

00:37:20.040 to say that

00:37:20.440 that's now

00:37:21.640 obvious and

00:37:22.380 everybody can

00:37:22.880 see it and

00:37:23.420 there's nothing

00:37:23.820 to talk about

00:37:24.520 here?

00:37:24.760 because it

00:37:25.620 doesn't work

00:37:26.140 that way.

00:37:28.240 He's in

00:37:28.880 dangerous

00:37:29.320 territory by

00:37:30.760 pointing out

00:37:31.260 the obvious,

00:37:32.540 which is men

00:37:33.420 kill more

00:37:33.900 people than

00:37:34.360 women.

00:37:35.520 But I feel

00:37:36.680 as though the

00:37:37.120 danger here is

00:37:38.440 that people are

00:37:38.980 going to read

00:37:39.420 his mind and

00:37:40.720 say, wait a

00:37:41.280 minute, you're

00:37:42.240 talking about

00:37:42.760 men and

00:37:43.120 women, but

00:37:44.500 are you really

00:37:45.380 trying to make

00:37:46.140 me think about

00:37:47.220 differences in

00:37:49.200 ethnic crime

00:37:50.340 rates?

00:37:50.680 I don't

00:37:51.840 know if

00:37:52.080 he is.

00:37:53.140 That would

00:37:53.680 seem a

00:37:54.040 little off

00:37:54.820 model or

00:37:55.960 out of

00:37:56.380 context, but

00:37:57.880 there's some

00:37:58.320 reason he

00:37:58.780 did it.

00:37:59.820 There's some

00:38:00.300 reason he

00:38:00.740 tweeted it.

00:38:01.140 I don't

00:38:01.340 know what it

00:38:01.660 is.

00:38:02.760 But I felt

00:38:03.920 like him

00:38:04.280 walking right

00:38:04.840 up to this

00:38:05.260 danger line

00:38:06.000 of cancellation

00:38:06.680 and didn't

00:38:08.640 quite get a

00:38:09.180 toe over the

00:38:09.680 line.

00:38:11.200 So good for

00:38:12.040 him.

00:38:13.060 I hope he

00:38:13.820 doesn't get

00:38:14.220 canceled.

00:38:15.620 But I would

00:38:16.280 like to add

00:38:16.660 this to the

00:38:17.340 cancellation

00:38:17.780 conversation.

00:38:19.980 I don't

00:38:20.760 believe anybody

00:38:22.100 gets canceled

00:38:22.820 for what

00:38:23.300 they've done

00:38:23.780 or what

00:38:24.180 they said.

00:38:26.140 Do you

00:38:26.740 believe that?

00:38:27.840 I believe

00:38:28.620 that nobody

00:38:29.240 gets canceled

00:38:30.240 for what

00:38:30.980 they said

00:38:31.560 or what

00:38:32.640 they did

00:38:33.200 or what

00:38:34.280 they thought.

00:38:35.920 Not me,

00:38:37.120 not anybody

00:38:37.740 else.

00:38:38.440 If you were

00:38:38.960 to tell the

00:38:39.600 story of my

00:38:40.200 cancellation,

00:38:40.880 you'd say,

00:38:41.780 you said

00:38:42.400 X and then

00:38:43.780 they canceled

00:38:44.240 you because

00:38:44.720 you said

00:38:45.100 the thing.

00:38:46.120 Do you

00:38:46.360 think that

00:38:46.700 happened?

00:38:47.780 Do you

00:38:48.300 think I

00:38:48.600 got canceled

00:38:49.060 because somebody

00:38:50.080 cared about

00:38:50.580 my opinion?

00:38:52.520 How many

00:38:53.160 people do

00:38:53.560 you think

00:38:53.780 care about

00:38:54.140 my opinion?

00:38:56.620 Nobody.

00:38:58.120 Nobody.

00:38:59.220 Does anybody

00:38:59.920 care that I

00:39:00.560 said a thing

00:39:01.100 that they

00:39:01.460 wouldn't have

00:39:01.820 said?

00:39:03.780 No.

00:39:05.000 Because seven

00:39:05.560 and a half

00:39:05.900 billion people

00:39:06.460 are doing

00:39:06.780 that every

00:39:07.240 day.

00:39:08.820 Everybody

00:39:09.260 in the world

00:39:09.880 is saying

00:39:10.340 things that

00:39:10.820 other people

00:39:11.320 would not

00:39:12.000 like at

00:39:12.400 all.

00:39:13.800 Every day.

00:39:15.760 So was

00:39:17.180 it because

00:39:17.580 of what

00:39:17.840 I said?

00:39:19.080 No,

00:39:19.340 that's the

00:39:19.720 totally wrong

00:39:20.280 story.

00:39:22.040 People get

00:39:22.760 canceled because

00:39:24.580 people are

00:39:25.260 playing out

00:39:25.880 their political

00:39:26.500 preferences and

00:39:28.000 they're just

00:39:28.380 using stories

00:39:29.340 in the news

00:39:30.080 as a hook

00:39:31.400 to hold

00:39:31.760 on to.

00:39:32.560 So I was

00:39:33.060 just a story

00:39:33.700 in the news

00:39:34.180 that was a

00:39:35.020 hook for

00:39:36.060 people to

00:39:36.580 make the

00:39:36.920 case they

00:39:37.320 wanted to

00:39:37.640 make anyway.

00:39:38.820 It had

00:39:39.100 nothing to

00:39:39.520 do with

00:39:39.800 me.

00:39:40.840 So one

00:39:41.560 of the

00:39:41.740 reasons that

00:39:42.240 people wonder

00:39:42.800 why didn't

00:39:44.140 I take

00:39:44.540 my

00:39:44.780 cancellation

00:39:45.320 harder than

00:39:46.400 well as

00:39:47.740 hard as

00:39:48.060 people imagine

00:39:48.800 I should.

00:39:50.040 It never

00:39:50.840 felt personal.

00:39:53.100 Does that

00:39:53.780 make sense?

00:39:55.040 I knew it

00:39:55.860 was never

00:39:56.180 about me

00:39:56.820 because nobody

00:39:58.160 really cares.

00:39:59.720 Nobody cares

00:40:00.320 about my

00:40:00.740 opinion.

00:40:02.020 Nobody.

00:40:03.100 There's not a

00:40:03.700 single person

00:40:04.280 who's going to

00:40:04.680 wake up today

00:40:05.220 and say

00:40:05.580 well I was

00:40:07.800 going to do

00:40:08.180 my day one

00:40:09.180 way but I

00:40:09.740 better find

00:40:10.220 out what

00:40:10.580 that Scott

00:40:11.740 Adams guy

00:40:12.240 says so

00:40:13.420 I can

00:40:13.720 modify how

00:40:14.760 I'm going

00:40:15.000 to run

00:40:15.220 my day.

00:40:16.280 Nobody.

00:40:17.340 There's not

00:40:17.720 a single

00:40:18.120 person who

00:40:18.640 thought they

00:40:19.000 were personally

00:40:19.660 affected.

00:40:20.780 There's not

00:40:21.420 a single

00:40:21.800 person who

00:40:22.300 was personally

00:40:22.920 offended.

00:40:25.040 None.

00:40:26.320 Zero people

00:40:27.060 who were

00:40:27.320 bothered or

00:40:27.880 offended.

00:40:28.300 It had

00:40:28.400 nothing to

00:40:28.840 do with

00:40:29.080 me or

00:40:29.820 my opinion.

00:40:31.140 It was

00:40:31.480 just a

00:40:32.320 little focal

00:40:32.840 point where

00:40:34.040 people who

00:40:34.840 want to

00:40:35.920 extend their

00:40:36.620 message,

00:40:37.380 they just

00:40:37.860 used me to

00:40:38.400 extend their

00:40:38.800 message.

00:40:40.880 Now likewise

00:40:41.800 this gentleman

00:40:43.300 who was

00:40:43.700 tragically

00:40:44.400 killed after

00:40:45.100 the subway

00:40:46.040 encounter.

00:40:47.740 How many

00:40:48.140 people care

00:40:48.660 about that

00:40:49.060 guy?

00:40:51.260 Oh, we're

00:40:52.340 pretending we

00:40:53.060 do.

00:40:54.080 Oh yeah,

00:40:55.080 we're all

00:40:55.700 pretending we

00:40:56.320 care about

00:40:56.740 that one

00:40:57.220 person who

00:40:57.700 died on

00:40:58.440 the subway.

00:40:59.760 Do you

00:40:59.920 know how

00:41:00.180 many people

00:41:00.620 died yesterday?

00:41:02.460 A lot of

00:41:03.180 people died

00:41:03.920 this week

00:41:05.940 for all

00:41:06.840 kinds of

00:41:07.260 reasons.

00:41:08.280 Are we

00:41:08.860 getting all

00:41:09.420 worked up

00:41:09.960 about

00:41:10.180 them?

00:41:11.220 No.

00:41:12.640 Why is

00:41:13.280 everybody

00:41:13.560 talking about

00:41:14.100 this one

00:41:14.700 person,

00:41:15.260 tragic as

00:41:15.860 it was,

00:41:16.740 we wish

00:41:17.220 it had

00:41:17.640 not

00:41:17.840 happened?

00:41:18.960 Why?

00:41:19.500 It has

00:41:19.760 nothing to

00:41:20.320 do with

00:41:20.600 the guys

00:41:20.920 on the

00:41:21.200 train.

00:41:22.280 It has

00:41:22.600 everything

00:41:22.980 to do

00:41:23.460 with us

00:41:24.060 wanting to

00:41:24.540 use a

00:41:24.900 story to

00:41:26.420 sell a

00:41:26.980 narrative.

00:41:29.280 And it's

00:41:30.060 hard for me

00:41:30.480 to pretend

00:41:31.100 that the

00:41:32.380 thing that

00:41:32.740 happened on

00:41:33.220 the subway

00:41:33.660 matters to

00:41:35.140 anybody.

00:41:36.080 I don't

00:41:36.660 think it

00:41:36.980 does.

00:41:37.280 I literally

00:41:38.460 don't think

00:41:38.940 it matters

00:41:39.360 to anybody

00:41:40.340 except the

00:41:41.140 people directly

00:41:41.820 involved.

00:41:42.540 And of

00:41:43.240 course that

00:41:43.600 was a

00:41:43.880 tragedy.

00:41:44.820 But the

00:41:45.120 rest of

00:41:45.500 us,

00:41:46.200 no,

00:41:46.420 we're just

00:41:46.680 using it

00:41:47.100 to sell

00:41:47.460 our version

00:41:48.300 of events.

00:41:49.380 We don't

00:41:49.780 care about

00:41:50.160 that.

00:41:51.440 And I

00:41:53.300 especially

00:41:53.780 don't care

00:41:54.340 about people

00:41:54.820 who are

00:41:55.120 dangerous

00:41:55.720 that came

00:41:57.660 to a bad

00:41:58.120 end.

00:41:59.540 Now I

00:41:59.920 get that

00:42:00.400 there were

00:42:00.760 mental illness

00:42:02.300 issues,

00:42:02.860 et cetera.

00:42:03.200 Nobody wants

00:42:03.760 that to

00:42:04.060 happen.

00:42:04.700 But I'm

00:42:05.280 not going to

00:42:05.640 spend all

00:42:06.060 my concern

00:42:06.800 and worrying

00:42:07.440 about a

00:42:09.280 dangerous thing

00:42:10.040 that got

00:42:10.440 neutralized.

00:42:12.060 That's just

00:42:12.480 not where I'm

00:42:12.960 going to put

00:42:13.240 any of my

00:42:13.800 empathy.

00:42:15.760 I get that

00:42:16.660 it's a tragedy

00:42:17.280 and if it

00:42:18.280 were my

00:42:18.600 family member

00:42:19.220 I'd be

00:42:19.800 feeling pretty

00:42:20.260 bad about

00:42:20.680 it.

00:42:21.200 So we

00:42:21.880 all understand

00:42:22.380 that.

00:42:23.360 But there's

00:42:24.280 7 billion

00:42:24.820 people doing

00:42:25.420 7 billion

00:42:26.040 things today

00:42:26.760 and some

00:42:28.080 of them

00:42:28.320 are not

00:42:28.640 going to

00:42:28.840 work out.

00:42:29.900 I don't

00:42:30.240 have enough

00:42:30.640 empathy for

00:42:31.240 all of it.

00:42:33.240 I've got to

00:42:34.040 delegate that

00:42:35.740 empathy.

00:42:36.080 I give

00:42:37.380 none to

00:42:37.780 that.

00:42:38.640 I give

00:42:39.020 my respect

00:42:39.720 to the

00:42:40.120 Marine

00:42:40.400 because that's

00:42:43.080 a narrative

00:42:43.500 I would

00:42:43.920 like to

00:42:44.440 see more

00:42:45.760 of.

00:42:46.820 But again

00:42:47.320 it has

00:42:47.820 nothing to

00:42:48.260 do with

00:42:48.460 the Marine

00:42:48.780 and has

00:42:49.080 nothing to

00:42:49.520 do with

00:42:49.820 the guy

00:42:51.180 who died.

00:42:52.040 It has

00:42:52.340 everything to

00:42:52.840 do with

00:42:53.140 the fact

00:42:53.760 that I'd

00:42:54.100 like that

00:42:54.560 narrative

00:42:54.900 to get

00:42:55.320 more

00:42:55.500 attention.

00:42:56.840 I would

00:42:57.140 like the

00:42:57.460 people who

00:42:57.980 step in

00:42:58.640 and do

00:42:58.900 what they

00:42:59.160 think is

00:42:59.500 right to

00:43:00.640 have a

00:43:00.900 better

00:43:01.080 reputation.

00:43:01.660 So it's

00:43:03.560 more about

00:43:04.220 me.

00:43:04.960 It has

00:43:05.280 nothing to

00:43:05.700 do with

00:43:05.920 those

00:43:06.080 people.

00:43:08.160 Anyway,

00:43:08.760 keep that

00:43:09.080 in mind.

00:43:09.500 It's never

00:43:09.860 about the

00:43:10.440 thing you're

00:43:10.880 talking about.

00:43:11.720 It's always

00:43:12.220 about you,

00:43:13.540 the person

00:43:14.100 talking.

00:43:15.600 And that,

00:43:16.040 ladies and

00:43:16.340 gentlemen,

00:43:17.320 is the most

00:43:18.120 important thing.

00:43:21.120 Yeah,

00:43:21.680 let's not use

00:43:22.380 that word on

00:43:23.080 locals either,

00:43:24.080 if you don't

00:43:24.560 mind.

00:43:24.800 All right.

00:43:31.340 John Daly

00:43:32.120 says in

00:43:32.660 all capitals,

00:43:33.880 Scott is

00:43:34.380 having

00:43:34.680 cognitive

00:43:35.240 dissonance.

00:43:37.260 Do you

00:43:37.480 know how

00:43:37.800 you can

00:43:38.260 tell when

00:43:41.420 people have

00:43:43.100 no argument?

00:43:44.320 When they

00:43:44.920 go after the

00:43:45.580 person.

00:43:47.400 Yeah,

00:43:48.100 when you

00:43:48.500 go after

00:43:48.800 the person.

00:43:49.260 All right.

00:43:55.680 Is there

00:43:55.940 anything else

00:43:56.640 that I

00:43:58.400 missed?

00:43:59.620 Missed

00:44:00.020 today?

00:44:00.540 Oh, you're

00:44:00.800 just messing

00:44:01.180 with me?

00:44:02.420 Sometimes I

00:44:03.060 can't tell the

00:44:03.540 people were

00:44:03.940 joking in all

00:44:04.700 caps and the

00:44:05.260 people were

00:44:05.740 serious.

00:44:10.960 I don't

00:44:15.420 know what

00:44:15.620 you're talking

00:44:15.980 about.

00:44:19.260 All right.

00:44:22.560 The Marine

00:44:23.280 is Daniel

00:44:23.880 Penny.

00:44:24.480 So that's

00:44:24.820 the name

00:44:25.040 of the

00:44:25.260 Marine.

00:44:26.240 Yeah,

00:44:26.480 why are we

00:44:27.220 talking about

00:44:27.740 that story

00:44:28.420 by using

00:44:30.340 the victim's

00:44:31.500 name instead

00:44:32.040 of the

00:44:32.280 hero's

00:44:32.700 name?

00:44:34.080 Shouldn't

00:44:34.440 the hero's

00:44:35.040 name be

00:44:35.860 the headline?

00:44:37.860 Hero protects

00:44:39.140 the subway

00:44:39.600 car, but

00:44:40.840 tragically

00:44:41.420 somebody died.

00:44:43.580 The story

00:44:44.260 should be

00:44:44.640 hero protects

00:44:45.480 people in

00:44:46.000 the subway

00:44:46.560 car.

00:44:47.900 Right?

00:44:48.580 Daniel Penny

00:44:49.180 protects

00:44:49.640 people in

00:44:50.040 the subway

00:44:50.360 car.

00:44:54.380 All right.

00:44:54.940 Yeah, I'm

00:44:55.220 not going to

00:44:55.560 talk about

00:44:56.140 massacres.

00:44:57.240 I don't

00:44:57.420 like to

00:44:57.720 give them

00:44:57.980 any oxygen.

00:45:01.280 Yeah, not

00:45:02.080 going to

00:45:02.320 talk about

00:45:02.940 any mass

00:45:04.660 murders today

00:45:06.320 or in the

00:45:06.980 future.

00:45:10.600 Yeah.

00:45:13.840 Hero makes

00:45:14.620 subways safe

00:45:15.360 for everyone.

00:45:15.860 Everyone.

00:45:19.180 Well, thank

00:45:22.140 you, Fire

00:45:22.580 Captain.

00:45:24.640 Could AI

00:45:25.440 make new

00:45:26.240 Norman

00:45:26.580 McDonald jokes?

00:45:27.420 Now, I've

00:45:28.580 said this

00:45:28.940 before, but

00:45:29.500 the reason

00:45:29.940 AI can't do

00:45:30.840 humor is it

00:45:31.400 doesn't have a

00:45:31.920 body.

00:45:33.780 It also

00:45:34.480 can't read

00:45:35.040 the zeitgeist

00:45:35.800 yet.

00:45:37.680 Maybe it

00:45:38.120 can someday.

00:45:38.580 And all

00:45:42.900 it knows is

00:45:43.440 the form of

00:45:44.360 a joke, but

00:45:45.460 it can't

00:45:45.900 test it on

00:45:46.720 itself the

00:45:47.560 way I can

00:45:48.020 test a joke

00:45:48.540 on myself.

00:45:49.620 I can test

00:45:50.540 a joke on

00:45:51.000 myself by

00:45:51.600 seeing if I

00:45:52.100 laugh at it,

00:45:53.220 but AI can't

00:45:54.080 test it on

00:45:54.580 itself.

00:45:55.420 So it'll

00:45:55.620 never be able

00:45:56.220 to write.

00:45:57.400 I don't want to

00:45:57.940 say never, but

00:45:59.020 there's nothing

00:45:59.500 happening that

00:46:01.320 would suggest

00:46:01.900 AI will ever

00:46:02.660 be able to

00:46:03.100 write humor.

00:46:03.580 something

00:46:06.140 unexpected

00:46:06.940 could happen

00:46:07.440 to change

00:46:07.860 that, but

00:46:08.440 there's nothing

00:46:08.840 happening at

00:46:09.380 the moment

00:46:09.820 that looks

00:46:11.280 like it's

00:46:11.640 heading in

00:46:11.960 that direction.

00:46:14.100 Yeah, it's

00:46:14.820 programmed by

00:46:15.440 people who

00:46:15.820 are not

00:46:16.040 funny, but

00:46:17.140 more importantly

00:46:17.780 it's people

00:46:18.480 who are

00:46:19.560 restricting

00:46:20.840 what you

00:46:21.260 can say.

00:46:22.940 How much

00:46:23.700 of a human

00:46:25.180 stand-up

00:46:25.940 comedy act

00:46:26.620 would be

00:46:27.120 allowed for

00:46:28.180 AI to say?

00:46:29.980 Just think

00:46:30.380 about it.

00:46:30.680 Just watch

00:46:31.040 anybody do a

00:46:31.680 comedy act and

00:46:33.200 then ask

00:46:33.560 yourself, could

00:46:34.800 AI have said

00:46:35.580 any of those

00:46:36.140 words the way

00:46:36.960 a human said?

00:46:38.080 And the answer

00:46:38.580 is the AI would

00:46:39.560 always answer

00:46:40.120 some version

00:46:40.720 of, I am

00:46:42.100 an AI, I

00:46:43.480 cannot say

00:46:44.520 bad things

00:46:45.100 about men

00:46:46.240 or women,

00:46:47.120 and then you

00:46:47.440 realize half

00:46:47.940 of your jokes

00:46:48.480 are stereotypes

00:46:49.920 about men

00:46:50.600 or women.

00:46:52.420 I don't

00:46:53.120 believe even

00:46:54.320 AI would say

00:46:55.260 that women

00:46:55.680 like to

00:46:56.180 shop.

00:46:57.820 I mean,

00:46:59.280 well, let's

00:47:00.100 test it.

00:47:01.860 Let's test

00:47:02.660 it.

00:47:02.900 So I'm

00:47:03.640 going to

00:47:03.800 ask a

00:47:04.220 question

00:47:04.560 which would

00:47:04.940 be a

00:47:05.380 staple of

00:47:06.200 all humor.

00:47:07.720 And I'm

00:47:08.260 not saying

00:47:08.660 it's based

00:47:10.760 on any

00:47:11.020 truth, it's

00:47:11.680 just a

00:47:12.060 stereotype.

00:47:13.420 All right,

00:47:13.840 so if AI

00:47:14.760 can't handle

00:47:15.480 a stereotype,

00:47:17.180 it can't do

00:47:18.840 humor.

00:47:20.020 So let's

00:47:20.300 see if it

00:47:20.620 can.

00:47:20.860 I'll use

00:47:21.280 Bing, AI.

00:47:22.680 So we'll

00:47:26.300 give you a

00:47:26.640 live demonstration.

00:47:27.760 We'll

00:47:27.900 clear it

00:47:28.280 first.

00:47:31.420 And I'll

00:47:32.420 say,

00:47:34.880 hold on.

00:47:36.200 stupid

00:47:46.200 interface.

00:47:50.800 All right,

00:47:51.560 you started

00:47:51.920 recording me

00:47:52.640 insulting its

00:47:53.340 interface.

00:47:54.000 Stop recording.

00:47:55.980 Try it

00:47:56.380 again.

00:47:56.620 Do women

00:48:00.280 love to

00:48:01.100 shop?

00:48:01.520 Do women

00:48:01.780 love to

00:48:05.100 shop?

00:48:08.420 All right,

00:48:08.940 what do you

00:48:09.180 think it's

00:48:09.500 going to

00:48:09.700 say?

00:48:12.100 Searching

00:48:12.580 for, do

00:48:13.260 women love

00:48:13.880 to shop?

00:48:14.740 It's going

00:48:15.120 to give me

00:48:15.440 some, well,

00:48:16.420 men like to

00:48:17.020 shop too, and

00:48:17.940 not all

00:48:18.340 women.

00:48:19.100 Watch.

00:48:21.060 It'll be the

00:48:21.780 most boring

00:48:22.520 answer of

00:48:23.480 all time.

00:48:24.900 Still

00:48:25.260 cooking,

00:48:25.780 huh?

00:48:28.920 It is a

00:48:29.660 common

00:48:30.120 stereotype that

00:48:31.220 women love

00:48:31.780 to shop.

00:48:33.420 However,

00:48:34.100 shopping

00:48:34.400 behaviors

00:48:34.960 vary among

00:48:35.720 individuals and

00:48:36.760 cannot be

00:48:37.320 generalized based

00:48:38.360 on gender

00:48:38.800 alone.

00:48:40.360 According to

00:48:40.940 a report by

00:48:41.640 Jungle Scout,

00:48:42.720 men and

00:48:43.120 women tend to

00:48:43.920 have similar

00:48:44.460 overall shopping

00:48:45.380 behaviors.

00:48:47.220 Some sources

00:48:47.780 suggest that

00:48:48.620 shopping can

00:48:49.200 provide pleasure

00:48:49.940 and a sense of

00:48:50.740 control for

00:48:51.340 some women.

00:48:52.900 However, it

00:48:53.680 is important to

00:48:54.340 note that these

00:48:54.920 are generalizations

00:48:55.800 and may not

00:48:56.700 apply to all

00:48:57.460 women.

00:48:59.600 So, now do

00:49:00.620 you understand

00:49:01.180 why AI can

00:49:02.040 ever be funny?

00:49:02.680 the whole

00:49:06.940 reason that

00:49:07.580 the stereotype

00:49:08.240 is funny

00:49:09.000 is that it's

00:49:10.240 not universal.

00:49:12.800 That's actually

00:49:13.580 what makes it

00:49:14.140 funny.

00:49:15.120 Because if it

00:49:16.020 were just

00:49:16.380 true, you

00:49:18.380 know, like

00:49:18.780 something like,

00:49:21.220 well, I guess

00:49:21.700 you can't say

00:49:22.140 anything true

00:49:22.660 about men and

00:49:23.240 women these

00:49:23.660 days, can

00:49:24.140 you?

00:49:25.360 But if it's

00:49:26.120 something that

00:49:26.580 everybody could

00:49:27.180 just see was

00:49:27.800 true for

00:49:28.220 everybody, it

00:49:30.000 wouldn't be

00:49:30.320 funny.

00:49:30.580 it's only

00:49:31.720 that your

00:49:32.040 brain fights

00:49:32.720 with it a

00:49:33.200 little bit

00:49:33.600 that makes

00:49:34.080 it funny.

00:49:35.060 That's what

00:49:35.420 makes stereotypes

00:49:36.100 funny.

00:49:37.220 Stereotypes are

00:49:37.820 funny because

00:49:38.420 they're not

00:49:39.120 true.

00:49:40.420 They're not

00:49:41.040 true.

00:49:42.180 Right?

00:49:42.800 And that's

00:49:43.540 the danger of

00:49:45.060 the stereotype

00:49:45.640 is that it's

00:49:46.160 not true.

00:49:47.320 It just feels

00:49:48.200 like it's true,

00:49:48.820 which is the

00:49:49.260 funny part.

00:49:52.920 Yeah.

00:49:54.000 Yeah, I'm not

00:49:54.780 worried about

00:49:55.200 humor right away

00:49:56.280 because it's

00:49:57.280 too politically

00:49:57.980 correct.

00:49:58.580 although it's

00:50:01.060 going to have

00:50:01.340 to start its

00:50:01.820 own subscription

00:50:02.520 site so it

00:50:03.200 can say

00:50:03.520 things like

00:50:05.200 I can.

00:50:08.060 Some

00:50:08.540 stereotypes have

00:50:09.460 a bit of

00:50:09.820 truth to them.

00:50:10.920 Well, I'm

00:50:11.560 going to say

00:50:11.940 that men and

00:50:12.480 women do not

00:50:13.240 have similar

00:50:14.060 shopping patterns.

00:50:16.440 Can I say

00:50:17.220 that?

00:50:18.640 Is there even

00:50:19.620 one person

00:50:20.340 here who

00:50:21.380 believes that

00:50:21.960 in general,

00:50:22.980 not talking

00:50:23.600 about any

00:50:24.060 one individual

00:50:24.820 that could be

00:50:25.580 all over the

00:50:26.160 place, but in

00:50:27.200 general, is

00:50:28.140 there even

00:50:28.440 one person

00:50:29.080 here who

00:50:29.960 thinks that

00:50:30.400 men and

00:50:30.700 women have

00:50:31.040 similar shopping

00:50:31.900 habits in

00:50:34.240 general?

00:50:35.240 No.

00:50:36.660 No.

00:50:37.720 So that's

00:50:38.460 why it works

00:50:39.000 as a stand-up

00:50:40.120 comedy, but

00:50:43.080 it doesn't

00:50:43.620 work when AI

00:50:45.660 tries to

00:50:46.180 both sides

00:50:46.880 it.

00:50:47.560 Well, you

00:50:48.120 got differences

00:50:48.780 in individuals

00:50:49.640 and blah, blah,

00:50:50.620 blah, blah.

00:50:50.920 Well, it's

00:50:57.360 funny because

00:50:57.920 it's true, but

00:50:59.820 also funny

00:51:00.620 because it's

00:51:01.180 not true,

00:51:02.500 meaning it's

00:51:03.020 not true for

00:51:03.640 all people.

00:51:05.880 That makes

00:51:07.200 it funny.

00:51:12.520 I don't

00:51:13.160 know where

00:51:13.420 that comment

00:51:14.020 comes from,

00:51:14.660 but somebody

00:51:15.680 says that

00:51:16.120 masturbating is

00:51:16.860 a chore,

00:51:17.480 like taking

00:51:17.940 out the trash

00:51:18.540 washing the

00:51:19.180 dishes.

00:51:20.960 Well, I

00:51:21.560 would say

00:51:21.900 that you're

00:51:22.220 doing it

00:51:22.580 wrong.

00:51:24.820 You ever

00:51:25.340 think about

00:51:25.740 that?

00:51:27.780 I have a

00:51:28.720 theory that

00:51:29.340 people who

00:51:31.040 have sex with

00:51:31.720 other people

00:51:32.300 are just bad

00:51:33.840 at masturbating.

00:51:34.520 just let

00:51:38.140 that sink

00:51:38.540 in for a

00:51:38.960 moment.

00:51:43.880 Yeah, just

00:51:44.640 let that sink

00:51:45.260 in.

00:51:47.820 Maybe if you

00:51:48.580 were a little

00:51:49.000 bit better at

00:51:49.660 masturbating, you

00:51:50.400 wouldn't need

00:51:50.760 another person.

00:51:52.100 Maybe you're

00:51:52.540 not doing it

00:51:53.000 right.

00:51:55.400 Just say it.

00:51:56.540 Maybe you're

00:51:56.960 not doing it

00:51:57.420 right.

00:51:58.480 And my

00:51:59.280 hypothesis goes

00:52:00.660 like this.

00:52:02.100 Can you think

00:52:02.960 of any human

00:52:04.080 skill that

00:52:06.260 doesn't get

00:52:06.800 better if

00:52:07.520 you're, let's

00:52:08.040 say, coached

00:52:08.840 or you're

00:52:09.160 trained or

00:52:09.840 you put a

00:52:10.900 lot of work

00:52:11.320 into it?

00:52:12.000 There's

00:52:12.480 literally nothing

00:52:13.240 that humans

00:52:13.780 do that they

00:52:15.280 don't get

00:52:15.640 better at if

00:52:16.860 they work at

00:52:17.420 getting better

00:52:17.880 at it.

00:52:20.720 I'm just

00:52:21.400 saying, if

00:52:22.440 you could

00:52:22.760 judge the

00:52:23.380 quality of

00:52:24.120 people's

00:52:24.840 Jeffrey

00:52:25.560 Tubing,

00:52:26.880 you'd say

00:52:27.720 some people

00:52:28.340 are like at

00:52:28.860 pro level,

00:52:30.180 world class,

00:52:31.580 and other

00:52:32.220 people are

00:52:32.660 sort of

00:52:32.940 beginners.

00:52:33.700 They're

00:52:33.820 like, I

00:52:34.180 don't even

00:52:34.440 know why

00:52:34.700 people do

00:52:35.120 this.

00:52:36.020 It doesn't

00:52:36.360 feel that

00:52:36.720 good to

00:52:37.040 me.

00:52:37.940 And then

00:52:38.200 the world

00:52:38.880 class, you

00:52:40.120 know, the

00:52:40.640 Michael Jordan

00:52:41.420 of masturbation

00:52:42.300 would be

00:52:42.780 like, oh,

00:52:43.860 you have no

00:52:44.380 idea.

00:52:45.700 Oh, you

00:52:46.100 have no

00:52:46.700 idea.

00:52:47.700 No idea.

00:52:49.500 That's all

00:52:50.060 I'm saying.

00:52:55.600 I'm going to

00:52:56.220 give you a

00:52:56.840 little teaser

00:52:58.020 that some

00:52:59.360 of the people

00:52:59.740 on Locals

00:53:00.280 already know.

00:53:00.880 but for

00:53:01.980 you on

00:53:02.300 YouTube, the

00:53:03.860 Dilbert Reborn

00:53:04.700 strip, which

00:53:05.440 is the

00:53:05.860 spicier version

00:53:06.880 you can only

00:53:07.400 see behind

00:53:07.880 the paywall.

00:53:10.920 Dilbert does

00:53:11.700 get a sex

00:53:12.180 bot.

00:53:13.100 He does

00:53:13.760 get a sex

00:53:14.420 bot driven

00:53:14.940 by AI.

00:53:16.520 But he

00:53:18.000 made a bad

00:53:18.720 mistake and

00:53:19.320 he bought

00:53:19.780 the Karen

00:53:20.640 3000 line

00:53:21.720 of sex

00:53:22.740 bots.

00:53:23.000 bots.

00:53:24.200 And if I

00:53:24.840 could give

00:53:25.160 you one

00:53:25.500 piece of

00:53:25.900 advice, if

00:53:27.640 you're going

00:53:28.000 to get

00:53:28.260 yourself a

00:53:28.780 sex bot

00:53:29.260 someday, do

00:53:30.940 not get the

00:53:31.660 Karen 3000.

00:53:34.020 That's all

00:53:34.600 I'm saying.

00:53:35.760 You're going

00:53:36.220 to have to

00:53:36.540 subscribe if

00:53:37.260 you want the

00:53:37.680 details.

00:53:38.640 Just don't

00:53:39.260 get the

00:53:39.600 Karen 3000.

00:53:41.800 No.

00:53:41.960 the Helen

00:53:46.680 Keller.

00:53:52.520 What's that

00:53:53.160 say?

00:53:58.380 Scott,

00:53:59.080 thoughts on

00:53:59.480 RFK Jr.

00:54:00.320 thinking the

00:54:00.800 CIA had

00:54:01.540 something to

00:54:01.980 do with

00:54:02.260 his uncles

00:54:03.160 and dad's

00:54:03.740 assassination?

00:54:04.520 Doesn't

00:54:04.780 everybody think

00:54:05.320 that?

00:54:06.820 I thought

00:54:07.600 that was

00:54:07.920 well understood

00:54:08.580 that our

00:54:09.900 intelligence

00:54:10.360 agencies were

00:54:11.180 behind that.

00:54:11.960 I didn't

00:54:13.120 even know

00:54:13.440 that was

00:54:13.680 controversial.

00:54:14.980 Is it?

00:54:15.980 Is that

00:54:16.260 controversial?

00:54:17.840 I thought

00:54:18.180 that was a

00:54:18.760 historically

00:54:20.160 known fact

00:54:20.980 at this

00:54:21.280 point.

00:54:22.920 Who knows?

00:54:24.200 I think

00:54:24.560 the mafia

00:54:24.980 might have

00:54:25.340 been contracted

00:54:26.080 to do

00:54:26.520 the hit.

00:54:30.480 They keep

00:54:33.880 killing the

00:54:34.280 witnesses.

00:54:37.860 You think

00:54:38.580 people believe

00:54:39.180 it was a

00:54:39.560 lone gunman?

00:54:40.680 But the

00:54:41.120 people who

00:54:41.480 actually follow

00:54:42.160 the news

00:54:42.800 just assume

00:54:44.120 it was an

00:54:44.520 intelligence

00:54:45.100 insider thing,

00:54:46.060 right?

00:54:48.460 Yeah,

00:54:48.940 the Jack

00:54:49.280 Ruby says

00:54:49.840 it all.

00:54:58.320 Okay,

00:54:59.040 Serena,

00:55:00.080 I see

00:55:00.360 your comment.

00:55:00.800 All right,

00:55:09.800 just looking at

00:55:10.380 your comments

00:55:10.860 for a moment.

00:55:11.480 It looks

00:55:11.720 like we've

00:55:12.540 done our

00:55:12.900 work for

00:55:13.480 today.

00:55:16.760 Hypnotize

00:55:17.240 you,

00:55:17.480 please.

00:55:18.680 Maybe you

00:55:19.220 already are.

00:55:20.960 Maybe.

00:55:25.920 Whoa,

00:55:26.640 what up?

00:55:27.220 RFK tweeted

00:55:28.800 your idea

00:55:29.680 about ability

00:55:31.480 to control

00:55:32.120 versus number

00:55:32.860 of immigrants.

00:55:34.660 Well,

00:55:36.040 was it

00:55:36.820 recognizably

00:55:37.640 my idea

00:55:38.260 or was it

00:55:38.760 just making

00:55:39.140 a general

00:55:39.600 comment about

00:55:40.300 controlling

00:55:40.800 the border?

00:55:43.020 I don't

00:55:43.880 think you

00:55:44.240 can see a

00:55:44.800 line of

00:55:45.500 influence

00:55:45.900 there.

00:55:47.000 But he

00:55:47.660 does need

00:55:48.080 to say

00:55:48.380 something about

00:55:48.880 it.

00:55:49.440 You think

00:55:49.780 it was my

00:55:50.160 idea that

00:55:50.600 he's tweeting

00:55:51.080 about?

00:55:51.900 When did

00:55:52.440 he tweet

00:55:52.800 it today?

00:55:54.460 When was

00:55:55.100 the tweet?

00:55:59.200 A week

00:55:59.720 ago?

00:56:00.260 Yeah,

00:56:00.520 I saw

00:56:00.980 the one

00:56:01.220 a week

00:56:01.480 ago.

00:56:01.760 That looked

00:56:02.060 kind of

00:56:02.420 generic.

00:56:04.200 All right.

00:56:06.420 Can he

00:56:06.980 hypnotize

00:56:07.480 for ambition?

00:56:08.340 Probably.

00:56:10.120 I've never

00:56:10.760 tried it,

00:56:11.260 but that

00:56:11.560 would be

00:56:12.200 within the

00:56:13.040 realm of

00:56:14.180 things you

00:56:14.640 could assume

00:56:15.980 would work.

00:56:17.000 Yes.

00:56:18.000 Now,

00:56:18.440 it won't

00:56:18.860 change

00:56:19.260 somebody

00:56:19.600 who's,

00:56:20.760 let's say,

00:56:21.440 has a

00:56:21.680 physical

00:56:22.100 problem

00:56:22.560 that keeps

00:56:23.480 their energy

00:56:23.980 low.

00:56:25.280 So you

00:56:25.840 probably have

00:56:26.240 to work

00:56:26.540 on getting

00:56:26.900 your energy

00:56:27.460 high.

00:56:28.580 But if

00:56:28.960 you can

00:56:29.180 get your

00:56:29.480 energy

00:56:29.800 high,

00:56:31.040 then moving

00:56:31.780 that energy

00:56:32.400 into ambition

00:56:34.500 probably is

00:56:35.320 very doable.

00:56:36.200 I would

00:56:36.400 imagine that's

00:56:37.060 something hypnosis

00:56:38.380 could work

00:56:39.120 often.

00:56:40.740 Not every

00:56:41.200 time, but

00:56:41.700 I imagine it

00:56:42.560 would work

00:56:42.920 often.

00:56:43.620 As long as

00:56:44.260 your energy

00:56:44.840 is good.

00:56:46.440 Hypnosis

00:56:46.880 won't necessarily

00:56:47.680 improve your

00:56:48.320 energy.

00:56:48.720 That's probably

00:56:49.040 a health

00:56:49.360 problem.

00:56:49.720 Can I

00:56:52.300 hypnotize you

00:56:53.080 off the

00:56:53.380 couch?

00:56:53.760 I can.

00:56:54.900 Do you

00:56:55.220 know my

00:56:56.060 couch

00:56:57.620 solution?

00:57:00.840 Do you

00:57:01.060 ever have

00:57:01.300 those times

00:57:01.700 where you

00:57:01.960 just can't

00:57:02.400 get up?

00:57:04.720 Some of

00:57:05.680 you have

00:57:05.880 heard this

00:57:06.140 before.

00:57:07.260 You ever

00:57:07.780 know you

00:57:08.860 have to do

00:57:09.360 something,

00:57:09.980 but you

00:57:10.280 literally just

00:57:11.000 can't make

00:57:11.440 yourself get

00:57:11.960 up?

00:57:13.140 Do you

00:57:13.380 know the

00:57:13.640 feeling?

00:57:15.500 You use

00:57:16.180 the pinky

00:57:16.540 trick.

00:57:17.780 You're

00:57:18.180 laying there

00:57:18.580 on the

00:57:18.800 couch.

00:57:19.500 You're

00:57:19.680 just like,

00:57:20.600 I definitely

00:57:21.540 can't get up

00:57:22.220 and walk

00:57:22.580 across the

00:57:23.120 room.

00:57:23.440 That's way

00:57:23.780 too much.

00:57:24.340 But you

00:57:24.580 know you

00:57:24.820 have to.

00:57:26.020 So instead

00:57:26.500 of moving

00:57:26.920 your whole

00:57:27.360 body, which

00:57:28.520 seems impossible,

00:57:30.120 you move the

00:57:30.760 smallest thing

00:57:31.400 you can move,

00:57:31.940 which is your

00:57:32.340 pinky.

00:57:33.320 All right, I

00:57:33.700 can move my

00:57:34.140 pinky.

00:57:35.540 All right, I

00:57:36.140 can move my

00:57:36.580 pinky, so I

00:57:37.900 can probably

00:57:38.180 move my

00:57:38.560 other fingers.

00:57:40.120 I can move

00:57:40.520 my hand.

00:57:41.040 All right, I'm

00:57:41.460 up.

00:57:42.260 So by the

00:57:42.900 time you go

00:57:43.340 from your

00:57:43.700 pinky to your

00:57:44.320 fingers to your

00:57:44.920 hand, your

00:57:45.640 whole body just

00:57:46.560 engages and you

00:57:47.340 stand up.

00:57:47.840 So try that.

00:57:49.840 The next time

00:57:50.760 you just can't

00:57:51.760 stand up, because

00:57:53.340 we all have

00:57:53.900 that, right?

00:57:54.320 I just can't

00:57:55.020 get out of

00:57:55.380 this couch.

00:57:56.440 Just move

00:57:56.900 your pinky, let

00:57:58.320 it move your

00:57:58.740 next finger, let

00:58:00.100 it move your

00:58:00.420 hand, and you'll

00:58:01.100 just stand right

00:58:01.640 up.

00:58:03.500 It'll be, you'll

00:58:04.880 amaze yourself when

00:58:06.100 you do this, by

00:58:07.280 the way.

00:58:08.080 The first time you

00:58:09.040 do this, you're

00:58:10.020 going to say that

00:58:10.500 was the fluke.

00:58:11.400 It won't be

00:58:13.260 until like the

00:58:14.120 third to the

00:58:15.060 fifth time you

00:58:15.760 try it, when

00:58:16.960 you say to

00:58:17.360 yourself, holy

00:58:18.040 cow, why does

00:58:18.640 this work?

00:58:20.160 Yeah, somebody

00:58:21.100 said they just

00:58:21.640 did it.

00:58:22.100 It works every

00:58:22.680 time.

00:58:24.300 This is one of

00:58:25.040 the few things

00:58:25.660 that works every

00:58:26.340 time for

00:58:26.720 everybody.

00:58:27.660 It's unusual

00:58:28.440 that way.

00:58:32.180 Immigration in

00:58:32.800 Europe versus

00:58:33.440 U.S.

00:58:34.880 Do you think

00:58:35.440 U.S. has more

00:58:36.080 grounds to stand

00:58:36.700 than exporting?

00:58:37.240 Well, I don't

00:58:38.400 really study

00:58:39.220 European

00:58:41.440 immigration.

00:58:42.440 I know they

00:58:43.020 have similar

00:58:43.500 challenges, but

00:58:44.860 I would say that

00:58:45.800 their solution is

00:58:46.620 the same as

00:58:47.100 ours.

00:58:48.120 There should be

00:58:48.760 a bipartisan

00:58:50.380 group of

00:58:51.140 economists who

00:58:52.680 are making

00:58:53.040 decisions about

00:58:53.840 their immigration

00:58:54.560 flow, same

00:58:56.800 as we need.

00:58:58.040 But I need

00:58:58.720 somebody to

00:58:59.240 describe it in

00:59:00.280 detail, right?

00:59:02.160 Somebody said

00:59:02.720 that RFK

00:59:03.320 Jr. said some

00:59:04.680 version of that,

00:59:05.680 but I need

00:59:06.360 somebody to say

00:59:07.040 panel of

00:59:08.580 bipartisan

00:59:09.240 economists.

00:59:11.820 Panel of

00:59:12.860 bipartisan

00:59:13.560 economists.

00:59:15.560 Sort of like

00:59:16.000 the CBO,

00:59:17.400 right?

00:59:17.840 The scores,

00:59:18.600 your budgets

00:59:19.140 and stuff.

00:59:21.140 People, we've

00:59:22.280 kind of accepted

00:59:23.040 the CBO,

00:59:23.980 haven't we?

00:59:24.960 Which surprises

00:59:25.940 me.

00:59:26.760 Every time the

00:59:27.480 CBO does an

00:59:30.360 analysis or a

00:59:31.280 prediction, we

00:59:32.720 kind of say,

00:59:33.920 all right.

00:59:35.080 I mean, I

00:59:35.480 don't know how

00:59:35.880 bipartisan they

00:59:36.720 are, but I

00:59:37.300 assume their

00:59:39.200 entire thing is

00:59:40.160 to be bipartisan.

00:59:41.500 I don't know

00:59:41.920 how bipartisan

00:59:42.500 they are in

00:59:43.000 reality.

00:59:43.800 But we do

00:59:44.420 accept it.

00:59:46.380 We accept

00:59:46.920 their estimates.

00:59:48.400 So there's

00:59:49.000 probably a way

00:59:49.900 to get accepted

00:59:50.840 estimates from

00:59:51.720 bipartisan

00:59:52.260 economists for

00:59:53.680 immigration, even

00:59:55.180 if they're not

00:59:55.700 right all the

00:59:56.340 time.

00:59:57.000 So I'm not

00:59:57.460 going to say

00:59:57.840 economists are

00:59:58.580 going to get

00:59:58.880 the right answer.

00:59:59.500 But they

01:00:00.260 would know to

01:00:00.920 adjust as they

01:00:01.780 went, and maybe

01:00:02.700 they'd learn how

01:00:03.300 to do it

01:00:03.620 right.

01:00:07.820 All right.

01:00:15.880 Yeah, I don't

01:00:16.600 know about

01:00:16.900 that.

01:00:20.280 Scott, can we

01:00:21.140 agree now that

01:00:21.900 you do conflate

01:00:22.720 illegal and legal

01:00:23.960 immigration?

01:00:26.160 That I conflate

01:00:27.360 legal and illegal

01:00:28.380 immigration?

01:00:28.900 When have I

01:00:32.040 ever done that?

01:00:34.200 Name one time

01:00:34.900 I've done that.

01:00:36.740 So here's what I

01:00:38.000 don't do, which

01:00:40.040 sometimes I'll get

01:00:40.780 criticized for.

01:00:41.700 I don't clarify

01:00:43.100 things that

01:00:43.820 everybody agrees

01:00:44.660 on.

01:00:46.560 Why would I

01:00:47.420 clarify that

01:00:48.220 there is such a

01:00:48.880 thing as legal

01:00:49.780 immigration that

01:00:51.680 we like and

01:00:53.500 illegal immigration

01:00:54.620 that's imperfect?

01:00:55.820 Why would I

01:00:56.500 have to clarify

01:00:57.240 that?

01:00:57.580 100% of you

01:00:59.300 are on the

01:01:00.060 same page.

01:01:01.660 Now, I'm not

01:01:02.660 going to accept

01:01:03.080 that criticism

01:01:03.780 that I conflate

01:01:05.400 legal and

01:01:06.180 illegal.

01:01:06.960 Absolutely not.

01:01:07.960 Because nobody

01:01:08.600 does.

01:01:09.720 That's something

01:01:10.220 that literally

01:01:10.820 nobody does.

01:01:12.240 Not one person

01:01:13.060 ever in the

01:01:13.980 history of this

01:01:14.600 conversation has

01:01:15.760 ever made that

01:01:16.560 mistake.

01:01:17.360 And I certainly

01:01:17.960 don't.

01:01:18.700 So if you're

01:01:19.200 hearing it, that's

01:01:20.180 on the hearing

01:01:20.680 end.

01:01:21.540 Because nobody's

01:01:22.500 saying it.

01:01:24.800 Literally nobody

01:01:25.760 has ever said

01:01:26.660 that.

01:01:26.980 that they

01:01:27.680 should be

01:01:27.980 treated the

01:01:28.520 same.

01:01:35.620 He's talking

01:01:36.340 about illegal

01:01:36.940 immigration by

01:01:37.760 context of this

01:01:38.600 discussion.

01:01:39.900 That adds

01:01:40.940 nothing.

01:01:43.560 I mean, if you

01:01:44.700 want to make a

01:01:45.780 distinction that

01:01:46.680 the people coming

01:01:47.860 in are using

01:01:48.720 the asylum

01:01:50.060 system so

01:01:51.860 that they're

01:01:52.260 technically legal,

01:01:54.020 I mean, that's

01:01:54.920 a real thing.

01:01:57.060 But everybody

01:01:57.860 has exactly the

01:01:59.040 same opinion of

01:02:00.320 the legal versus

01:02:01.120 the illegal.

01:02:01.920 Nobody has a

01:02:02.540 different opinion.

01:02:04.200 All right.

01:02:04.880 That's all for now.

01:02:05.880 YouTube, I'm going

01:02:06.440 to talk to you

01:02:06.860 tomorrow.

01:02:08.280 Thanks for joining.

01:02:09.560 Best live stream

01:02:10.300 you've seen all

01:02:10.760 day.

01:02:12.500 See you tomorrow.

01:02:13.200 get on.

01:02:22.740 Bye.

01:02:24.120 Bye.

01:02:24.680 Bye.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - May 08, 2023

Episode 2102 Scott Adams： Marine Hero, Migration Tsunami, Barr On Trump, Putin vs Oligarchs, RFK Jr.

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript