Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2103 Scott Adams： Title 42 Ends, eVerify Debate, RFK Jr., HCQ And CIA Killing Kennedy, More

00:00:00.000 Do-do-do-do-do-do.

00:00:03.180 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of civilization.

00:00:07.320 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and aren't you glad you made it?

00:00:10.980 Those of you watching this live are having the experience of your life.

00:00:15.220 Those of you watching it recorded, well, you wish you were here when it was live.

00:00:20.160 I'm sorry, but it'll still be great.

00:00:22.360 If you'd like to take it up to a level that nobody could ever even imagine was possible,

00:00:26.940 all you need is a cup or mug or a glass, a tanker, a chalice, a stein, a canteen jug or flask,

00:00:33.100 a vessel of any kind.

00:00:34.940 Fill it with your favorite liquid I like, coffee.

00:00:38.080 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the doping at the end of the day,

00:00:41.520 the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:43.520 It's called a simultaneous sip, and it ends with a big, ah, don't forget that part.

00:00:49.060 Go.

00:00:53.860 Ah.

00:00:56.940 Satisfying.

00:00:58.160 So satisfying.

00:01:00.300 All right, well, I continue to be amused by the best entertainment on the Internet,

00:01:06.660 which is when Twitter's community notes slap somebody down.

00:01:12.020 I'm still waiting for it to happen to me.

00:01:14.720 I don't think it's happened to me yet that I'm aware of.

00:01:18.060 But apparently, Randy Weingarten, who's the head of the biggest teachers union,

00:01:26.540 she's now on her sixth community notes correction.

00:01:31.340 Six times in a row.

00:01:33.240 I think it's all the same topic.

00:01:35.560 I believe she's claiming, let's say, that she put more energy into opening schools than the critics say is correct.

00:01:45.060 So it's a question of whether she was working hard to open schools or was she working hard to keep them closed for the benefit of the teachers.

00:01:53.920 So she's got a story that she's trying to sell that she was really trying to do the right thing for everybody.

00:02:02.320 And maybe that's true.

00:02:04.020 But community notes is having none of it.

00:02:06.620 So they're fact-checking the hell out of her.

00:02:08.400 If you got fact-checked by community notes six times, would you keep tweeting?

00:02:17.960 I think it would be time to stop tweeting after that six time.

00:02:22.940 But boy, they're vicious on her.

00:02:25.060 All right.

00:02:25.860 Title 42 ends Thursday.

00:02:27.740 That's that COVID-related rule that allowed some degree of border controls.

00:02:34.300 Now there are many, many, many, many potential immigrants waiting to come over.

00:02:42.580 And I guess Texas is sending reinforcements to the border and federal government, Biden, sending reinforcements to the border to handle all these people.

00:02:53.840 And here's the question I have.

00:02:56.460 Are those reinforcements there to turn people back?

00:02:59.520 Or are they just processing them?

00:03:02.820 Because they're all going to have legal claims, right?

00:03:05.120 Aren't they all going to come in and say, I'm not an illegal immigrant.

00:03:10.940 I'm escaping bad things.

00:03:13.300 So I need, what's that called?

00:03:18.200 What's it called when you come in?

00:03:19.760 Oh, asylum.

00:03:20.340 Yeah, I need asylum.

00:03:22.060 So in theory, all those reinforcements are not there to stop people from coming, are they?

00:03:27.780 Or are they there just to more efficiently process them as they come in?

00:03:33.160 I don't think they're there to stop anything.

00:03:35.520 They might be guiding them from illegal crossings to the legal crossings or something.

00:03:41.240 But here's a question I have.

00:03:42.840 This gives you an idea of what weird things enter my head.

00:03:48.420 So we know that it's mostly the coyotes, meaning the cartels, are behind all this human trafficking.

00:03:54.260 So for every huge group of immigrants trying to come across, there's some cartel person who's in charge.

00:04:03.220 Now here's a business question.

00:04:05.960 If you get stopped at the border, does the cartel offer a rebate?

00:04:12.200 Or do they say, all right, we promised we'd get you across the border and you've already paid us.

00:04:18.360 And they stopped you at this one border crossing, but we'll just take you at another one because you've paid.

00:04:27.220 See, most of you are reflexively saying that there's no refunds.

00:04:33.680 Are you sure?

00:04:36.160 Are you sure?

00:04:36.840 I'm not sure, because the cartels are such a business at this point that you actually wonder if they've started adopting any normal business principles.

00:04:51.000 Would you not be more likely to pay the cartels if you knew that they would try a second time if you got caught or they'd refund your money?

00:05:02.380 Right?

00:05:02.940 So it might be from a purely business perspective, they might get more business if they look like they're a good firm to work with.

00:05:13.560 Oh, yeah, we'll give you a rebate if it doesn't work, and we'll try it two or three times.

00:05:19.800 It probably doesn't cost them that much to try a second time.

00:05:23.800 I'm just wondering, if you assume that they're not acting like a regular business, you're probably right.

00:05:32.980 Probably right.

00:05:34.000 You know, they'll take what they can get.

00:05:35.860 But they might actually be running it like a regular business.

00:05:40.500 They might actually have rebates and, like, discounts.

00:05:44.320 And if you leave today, 20% off.

00:05:47.560 I mean, why wouldn't they?

00:05:48.480 If it works in every other business context, why wouldn't it work in this one?

00:05:54.380 I don't know.

00:05:55.160 I guess the only reason it wouldn't work is if you knew these people were all going to pay a large amount of money and try no matter what.

00:06:04.800 If people were going to come no matter what, and they were going to pay massive amounts, well, then they don't have to offer any deals.

00:06:10.320 But maybe they get more if they offer a good deal.

00:06:15.660 All right.

00:06:17.660 That's just my weird thought.

00:06:20.200 So DeSantis picked up some more free money.

00:06:22.920 And by that, I mean he did something that seems obvious, but only after he does it.

00:06:29.020 And then you say to yourself, well, why didn't everybody do that?

00:06:31.640 So DeSantis, of course, is trying to do things in Florida that would have some national-looking impact so that it helps him in Florida, but also helps him if he runs for office, which people think he will.

00:06:47.120 I'm still not convinced he's going to announce.

00:06:51.580 I still think it's a jump ball on that.

00:06:53.700 Could go either way.

00:06:55.460 I think he's waiting until the last minute to make sure.

00:06:57.460 And it probably just depends on Trump's legal problems and poll numbers, I'm guessing.

00:07:05.240 It just depends on that.

00:07:07.040 All right.

00:07:07.520 So what DeSantis did in Florida is there's some new legislation here preventing Chinese citizens from owning stuff in Florida except small properties.

00:07:20.960 And they can't have it near military facilities and, let's see.

00:07:28.420 So there's a few other things he's going to prevent China from doing in Florida.

00:07:32.480 But I guess this would apply to some other countries such as Cuba and North Korea.

00:07:36.860 Basically, Florida doesn't want foreign influence in their education system or ownership of too much of their property.

00:07:47.880 You could have a little bit.

00:07:48.820 But they don't want, basically, they just don't want this foreign influence in their state.

00:07:55.760 Now, who would be against that?

00:07:58.500 Yeah, this seems like free money.

00:08:00.380 Because when you describe it, it just sounds like an obvious thing to do.

00:08:04.940 It just seems obvious.

00:08:07.780 So, good for him.

00:08:08.880 That looks smart.

00:08:10.060 All right.

00:08:10.260 Here's an issue which I cannot come up with an opinion on yet.

00:08:14.120 And I'll tell you why.

00:08:14.800 It's really complicated.

00:08:15.480 So, Thomas Massey is tweeting against the E-Verify idea, which the E-Verify would be a digital way for all immigrants to be in a system.

00:08:30.060 And if they're not in the system, they can't get jobs.

00:08:32.500 And the idea is that if people can't get jobs, they'll self-deport because they're coming here for jobs.

00:08:41.760 Now, let's go through just and also part of E-Verify sort of unrelated but related is that the U.S. is looking toward maybe a fully digital currency.

00:08:56.480 So, if you had a digital currency, so every transaction could be tracked, and you had E-Verify, which eventually will apply to Americans as well as immigrants, one assumes,

00:09:08.580 then the government would have complete control that by pushing a button or two, they could just turn off your access to civilization,

00:09:17.560 which is a lot of power for your government.

00:09:21.620 That's a lot of power.

00:09:22.740 Now, Thomas Massey quite reasonably warns us that giving the government any new powers is dangerous,

00:09:31.900 and these specific new powers are probably extra dangerous because they're going to be watching everything you do,

00:09:38.220 and they can punish you with one button.

00:09:42.360 So, that's the reason not to do it.

00:09:44.300 But, if you don't do it, it'll be far, far harder to know if anybody's working in the U.S. illegally because it's easier to get, you know, fake paper documents.

00:09:55.000 I guess it would be harder for the, to get the fake digital documents.

00:09:59.160 So, and I saw one story that says that Florida already has problems at construction sites because they already have E-Verify.

00:10:11.080 E-Verify? Can somebody fact-check me on that?

00:10:14.840 Did Florida already implement E-Verify?

00:10:18.160 I see a confirmation. Yes.

00:10:21.240 And it's already having an effect that employers can't get employees?

00:10:26.100 And construction companies are sort of shutting down because they can't even operate?

00:10:30.920 Now, that's what would happen in California.

00:10:35.520 In California, if everyone who was here illegally suddenly needed E-Verify to even work,

00:10:44.680 that would be the end of, I don't know, 30% of all businesses in California.

00:10:51.680 It's a big number.

00:10:53.500 Small businesses.

00:10:54.280 Some, I would guess that 30% of all small businesses in California would instantly shut if we had E-Verify.

00:11:03.460 Because that's how illegal the system is.

00:11:06.040 We have a very mature illegal system where it's somewhat easy for people to get fake documents.

00:11:13.660 And under the current system, if you present fake documents to your employer, the employer is off the hook.

00:11:20.820 Did you know that?

00:11:21.540 The employer doesn't have any obligation if they've seen documents.

00:11:26.940 Because they're not supposed to be experts on fake documents.

00:11:29.840 They're just supposed to ask for them, confirm that they got them, you know, document that they got the documents.

00:11:35.940 And then the employer's out in trouble.

00:11:38.980 There's no legal risk after that.

00:11:41.080 You just have to check the documents.

00:11:43.160 But with E-Verify, I guess that changes.

00:11:45.460 And my assumption is that you would have to have somebody in E-Verify in order to have them as an employee.

00:11:54.900 I'm guessing.

00:11:56.080 That's where it's going.

00:11:57.520 Because otherwise there would be no point to it.

00:11:59.240 So what do you think of this?

00:12:04.940 Do you think this is a slippery slope that will be bad for all of us?

00:12:10.040 Or is it inevitable?

00:12:11.760 So you could argue about it all day long, but it won't make any difference.

00:12:14.660 It's just going to happen anyway.

00:12:15.760 Or is it a bad argument?

00:12:20.140 So I tweeted back to Thomas Massey.

00:12:24.520 I'll give you his tweet first.

00:12:26.140 He said, Thomas Massey said, Representative Massey said,

00:12:29.540 I hear people say E-Verify will be so effective at denying employment to illegals that millions of them will self-deport.

00:12:36.240 For E-Verify to work that well would require biometric proof of identity for every American and a cashless society.

00:12:48.180 Which is scary.

00:12:50.380 He says, is this what you want for your children?

00:12:54.420 What do you think of that argument?

00:12:56.180 So the argument would be, you know, it's not just about the undocumented immigrants.

00:13:02.640 It's also about, it's going to be all of us putting our biometric information in there.

00:13:08.860 So our fingerprints and our face prints and all that stuff.

00:13:11.980 What about that?

00:13:14.520 Well, let me give you the best counter argument I can.

00:13:22.240 I don't have an opinion on this yet.

00:13:25.620 I might form one, but it's very unpredictable.

00:13:29.240 So my first part of the opinion is it's unstoppable.

00:13:34.780 So therefore the argument is almost irrelevant.

00:13:39.440 It's unstoppable.

00:13:42.000 There's no way we're going to be using pieces of paper to pay people in 100 years.

00:13:47.460 Does anybody think we're going to be paying people with pieces of paper in 100 years?

00:13:52.960 There's no way to stop it.

00:13:54.740 Does anybody think that biometric identification won't be the standard in 100 years?

00:14:02.000 I mean, we might be cyborgs by then.

00:14:04.820 But none of this is stoppable.

00:14:07.360 Does anybody think it's stoppable?

00:14:10.840 It might be you slow downable.

00:14:14.160 You might be able to delay it.

00:14:15.860 And maybe you want to.

00:14:16.940 But none of this is stoppable.

00:14:18.280 So that's the first part of my argument is you can't stop something with this much utility.

00:14:25.460 That's the problem.

00:14:27.040 The problem is that it's just too useful for the government, but people will find benefit too.

00:14:34.040 Have you already reached the point where writing a check feels like you traveled back in time and you're churning your own butter?

00:14:40.180 The last time somebody asked you for a cash payment with like dollar bills that was some, you know, large-ish amount beyond, you know, beyond $40, didn't it feel just like ridiculous?

00:14:58.160 Because you've got Venmo, right?

00:15:00.700 You've got PayPal, you've got, you know, Google Pay.

00:15:06.740 Paying anybody a small amount of money with money feels like I just went back in time or something.

00:15:13.000 So let me explain my own situation, and this will give you some insight.

00:15:20.060 Take me personally as a public figure.

00:15:24.220 Would you agree that I don't have the option of hiding my identity in any practical way?

00:15:30.080 Would you agree?

00:15:32.100 Because I'm a public figure, right?

00:15:35.560 If I walked in someplace without my wallet, I could just say, Google me, right?

00:15:43.500 There's no doubt who I am.

00:15:46.340 I'm 100% easily identifiable with anybody who has a phone.

00:15:53.300 So you say you're Scott Adams, huh?

00:15:55.660 So you say.

00:15:56.680 So you say you're Scott Adams.

00:15:57.780 Well, yeah, you are Scott Adams, obviously.

00:16:01.840 Here's 900 pictures of you right here.

00:16:05.280 Yep.

00:16:05.780 Here's you talking.

00:16:06.940 Let's hear you talk.

00:16:07.620 Yep, that's you.

00:16:09.300 All right.

00:16:09.600 So in an inefficient way, I've already been living an e-verify life, which is my biometrics,

00:16:19.340 literally the way I look, has already been identifying me for decades.

00:16:24.900 And I can't go anywhere without anybody who has a phone being able to look at me and just check.

00:16:32.400 Now, if you had a facial identification app, even easier.

00:16:38.280 Click.

00:16:38.660 Now, that's individuals, right?

00:16:41.920 So you're saying, but Scott, that's individuals.

00:16:44.580 It's different than the government.

00:16:46.360 Well, I'm also using a system for travel called the CLEAR system.

00:16:51.580 Have you heard of that?

00:16:52.880 You go to the airport and you just show it your face and your eyeballs, and that's your identification.

00:16:57.520 And then you go to the front of the line.

00:17:01.920 So my biometrics already exist in that system.

00:17:05.820 Do you think the government could get access to it if it wanted?

00:17:10.220 Yeah, it just needs a reason.

00:17:12.300 It just needs a reason, that's all.

00:17:14.280 And they could ask for it.

00:17:17.460 With my phone, when I turn on my apps, usually I'm using facial recognition.

00:17:24.120 So Apple knows my face.

00:17:25.700 It's already got my biometrics in there.

00:17:28.520 It used to have my fingerprint.

00:17:31.400 Probably that's still stored somewhere, because the old phones use my fingerprint.

00:17:36.340 So I'm a person whose identity has been public for years, and I can't really hide.

00:17:44.680 I don't have that option.

00:17:46.600 And the money that I spend has already moved from a fair amount of it was cash,

00:17:52.920 actual dollar bills at one point in my life, paying people who were doing work, whatever.

00:17:59.180 But at this point, it's all digital.

00:18:01.860 I can't remember the last time I reached into my wallet and took out a piece of paper.

00:18:06.820 Do you have the same experience?

00:18:08.840 It just sort of doesn't happen.

00:18:11.000 I don't pay with anything with a piece of paper.

00:18:12.680 So the only reason I have any pieces of paper is for very just random stuff.

00:18:21.140 It's not even like a normal use.

00:18:24.380 Now, some of you are not where I am, so I'm not saying that my situation applies to you.

00:18:30.120 Here's the point I'm going to make.

00:18:31.600 I already live in a world where I have no privacy, and my biometrics are already recorded in a variety of ways,

00:18:40.840 and I already only use digital money.

00:18:43.540 So all of my transactions can be tracked.

00:18:47.520 Has there been a problem?

00:18:50.000 What problems have I encountered because of that?

00:18:53.260 I can't think of one.

00:18:55.180 Now, it doesn't mean that you wouldn't have a problem,

00:18:57.520 and it doesn't mean that I won't have one someday,

00:18:59.420 and it doesn't mean it wouldn't be worse if everybody were in my situation, right?

00:19:03.960 So you can do a whole population, not just one person.

00:19:06.900 But how about the idea that if everybody's in this digital currency and e-verify,

00:19:13.120 that the government could just push a button and turn off your money?

00:19:19.940 You realize that I got canceled globally, right?

00:19:23.580 I got canceled globally, you know, the Dilbert comic,

00:19:26.940 and it didn't take any work at all.

00:19:30.740 There was no effort whatsoever.

00:19:33.080 We already have a way to cancel people completely, right?

00:19:38.280 Now, I only got canceled from things I wanted to cancel me from.

00:19:41.800 They didn't need to take me out of all civilization

00:19:44.240 because they don't need me to starve, right?

00:19:46.880 If the government had turned off all of my ability to make money

00:19:51.340 or interact with the world, what would I have done in response?

00:19:55.840 I would have become a criminal immediately.

00:19:59.520 What else would you do?

00:20:01.460 There's no other option, right?

00:20:03.200 So the government, I don't think the government is going to want to create criminals.

00:20:08.280 So even though the government could, you know, tweak your money,

00:20:11.720 turn it off, turn it on, control your employment,

00:20:14.040 I don't think they want to because it doesn't help them to create new criminals

00:20:19.020 if your only option is to rob somebody for money.

00:20:22.860 Let me put it this way.

00:20:24.300 If the government ever made it so the only way I could make money

00:20:28.320 is by robbing people, I would rob people in a heartbeat.

00:20:35.420 Wouldn't you?

00:20:37.740 I'd be robbing people every day.

00:20:40.220 I mean, until I got caught, I suppose.

00:20:41.760 But I might also try to foment a revolution against the government.

00:20:48.240 At the same time I was robbing people,

00:20:49.880 I'd probably be forming a militia to attack the government.

00:20:55.360 If they took me out completely,

00:20:57.400 they would have created a super enemy that they wouldn't want.

00:21:01.780 So here's what I predict.

00:21:05.140 I don't think the government's going to want to turn people's money off completely,

00:21:09.080 with the rare exceptions of perhaps like a, let's say, a criminal who's on the run.

00:21:16.380 It might be a good way to catch a criminal on the run.

00:21:18.720 But they're not going to want to do it to people who just have an option of working.

00:21:22.680 If you have an option of having a job,

00:21:25.580 the government wants you to make money and pay taxes.

00:21:29.900 So I don't know that they're ever going to want to turn it off.

00:21:32.820 It doesn't make sense for anybody.

00:21:36.680 All right.

00:21:37.400 So I'm going to agree with Thomas Massey that the risk is real and unknown.

00:21:45.180 And you should be very cautious about going into any situation where the risk is real,

00:21:51.520 potentially very large, and unknown.

00:21:53.700 However, the counter-argument is there's nothing to stop it.

00:22:00.560 There's no way in 100 years you're going to be paying for things

00:22:03.160 with pieces of paper you carried in your pocket.

00:22:06.000 All right.

00:22:06.380 I'm not even going to listen to that argument.

00:22:09.800 And likewise, your biometrics are all getting into the system in a variety of ways.

00:22:14.740 You know, we're probably one week away from AI being able to identify you every time.

00:22:22.080 You know that, right?

00:22:24.500 Biometrics might not even make any difference.

00:22:27.880 Do you know that if AI wanted to identify me,

00:22:32.640 because I'm a public figure with a large body of writing,

00:22:36.780 I could talk to AI for 10 minutes.

00:22:39.800 It could check my answers against all the ways I've ever answered questions

00:22:43.980 or written things in the past,

00:22:45.880 because it has a large body of my work to pull from.

00:22:48.960 And it would know.

00:22:49.560 There's no way I could artificially choose words

00:22:54.180 over an extended, let's say, a 10-minute conversation

00:22:57.300 in which I could avoid being me.

00:23:00.160 I only know how to speak one way.

00:23:04.480 Like, even if I tried to pretend, it would be obvious I was pretending.

00:23:08.440 So we may be at a point, because of AI,

00:23:11.700 where the whole identification thing doesn't even matter.

00:23:14.580 You know, because AI will just know who you are and where you are,

00:23:19.120 and it'll just know you, basically.

00:23:21.080 So I'm going to say that I'm less afraid of this than Thomas Massey,

00:23:28.540 but his concerns are valid,

00:23:32.380 which is not quite an opinion yet,

00:23:36.460 because to be an opinion, I think I'd need to get closer to

00:23:39.340 we should do it or we should not do it or we should delay it.

00:23:42.460 I'm not there yet.

00:23:43.380 I'm recognizing the weight of his opinion,

00:23:47.780 but I'm not persuaded yet.

00:23:50.500 Could be.

00:23:51.660 I'm open to be persuaded on this.

00:23:54.320 Now, here's what I tweeted back to Representative Massey,

00:23:58.020 one of my all-time favorite politicians,

00:24:00.580 because he actually tells the truth and he's smart.

00:24:03.300 I advised him in a tweet,

00:24:07.960 I said that his argument needs a story to be persuasive,

00:24:11.880 and ideally a story that conjures up a visual.

00:24:16.100 Because if you try to persuade somebody,

00:24:17.880 you don't want to use just a conceptual argument,

00:24:20.420 such as, do you want your children to grow up in this world?

00:24:27.520 What?

00:24:28.840 Like, so I'm imagining a child,

00:24:30.420 and then I'm imagining that my child is always easily identified.

00:24:36.500 Does that scare me?

00:24:38.400 Does it scare me that my child, if they're stolen from me,

00:24:41.480 can be easily identified as my stolen child?

00:24:45.240 No, that sounds kind of good,

00:24:47.560 that my child will always be easily identified,

00:24:50.540 no matter what context.

00:24:52.640 And you can't change their identity.

00:24:54.800 You couldn't change it if you wanted to.

00:24:58.360 I don't know.

00:24:59.180 Does that sound bad?

00:25:00.420 And then, how about that world

00:25:01.840 where I'm paying everything with digital currency?

00:25:05.000 Do you think you can convince me

00:25:07.180 that paying for things

00:25:08.240 with just a few punches of a button

00:25:11.000 is worse for me

00:25:12.880 than having to go to the ATM

00:25:14.900 and get pieces of paper to carry around in my pocket?

00:25:20.320 It's not an argument

00:25:21.560 that has a feeling to it.

00:25:25.060 Do you understand that?

00:25:26.320 The concept you can understand intellectually,

00:25:29.000 and I can agree that there are risks there,

00:25:31.800 and they're pretty big.

00:25:33.280 I see that.

00:25:35.080 But it doesn't,

00:25:36.060 that concept doesn't come into my body,

00:25:38.660 and if it doesn't come into my body physically,

00:25:41.620 and give me like a fear,

00:25:43.740 or an elation, or something,

00:25:46.000 I'm not going to be persuaded.

00:25:49.420 So here's what I would need

00:25:50.840 for the Massey argument to be persuasive.

00:25:55.540 He needs to say,

00:25:56.820 all right, here's your scenario.

00:25:59.940 You did X,

00:26:01.220 and then the government did X to you.

00:26:03.640 Are you okay with that?

00:26:05.460 Now, maybe yes, maybe no,

00:26:06.760 maybe I disagree with this example,

00:26:08.240 but that would be visual.

00:26:10.920 So for example, it's like,

00:26:12.100 okay, you go to the ATM,

00:26:14.020 and it doesn't work,

00:26:15.620 because you said something on social media

00:26:17.980 that the government thought was inappropriate.

00:26:20.420 So now your money is blocked

00:26:22.120 because of speech.

00:26:24.920 Now, I don't know if that's a good example,

00:26:27.500 which is why I'm asking you for an example,

00:26:29.740 because I don't know if there is an example.

00:26:32.000 What exactly is the story

00:26:33.800 where I run into trouble

00:26:36.980 because there's digital payments

00:26:39.200 and the government e-verifies?

00:26:42.760 But what about the trucker rally?

00:26:47.940 They turned off their digital money?

00:26:50.640 But you're making my point,

00:26:52.440 not their point.

00:26:53.860 See, your point is that in the current system,

00:26:56.120 the truckers had their money turned off.

00:26:59.000 I'm saying that the current system

00:27:00.540 already allows you to turn off anybody's money.

00:27:02.660 The government can turn off any bank.

00:27:06.400 They just have to have a reason.

00:27:09.120 Right?

00:27:09.620 So your argument is actually supporting my case

00:27:12.620 that we already live in a place

00:27:14.680 where anybody's money can be turned off

00:27:16.640 by the government.

00:27:19.840 Yeah.

00:27:20.900 Anyway,

00:27:22.260 that's as deep as we can get on that.

00:27:27.180 Continuing to like Vivek Ramaswamy,

00:27:30.800 he appeared on,

00:27:32.060 I think it was Fox,

00:27:33.440 and he had this to say.

00:27:35.280 I'm going to quote it.

00:27:36.720 He said,

00:27:37.140 we're literally addicted to China.

00:27:39.220 They push fentanyl via cartels

00:27:41.220 across our southern border.

00:27:42.740 They push digital fentanyl via TikTok.

00:27:47.160 Digital fentanyl.

00:27:48.580 Very good.

00:27:50.120 Blackmailing young Americans.

00:27:51.940 Our national debt is basically financial fentanyl.

00:27:54.600 And Vivek says the real declaration of independence

00:27:59.360 for the 21st century is from the CCP.

00:28:04.240 It's pretty good framing.

00:28:06.280 The declaration of independence is from China.

00:28:09.560 That we need a new American revolution.

00:28:13.000 Now that's good persuasion.

00:28:16.480 Because the declaration of independence,

00:28:20.500 don't you think of that as physical?

00:28:23.920 I don't know.

00:28:24.520 Maybe it's just me.

00:28:25.540 But I actually see the piece of paper.

00:28:27.760 And I see the people with the old wigs

00:28:29.960 signing it and stuff.

00:28:31.860 And then I see the entire revolutionary war.

00:28:36.400 I see the actual red outfits

00:28:39.560 and the marching with the guns and stuff.

00:28:43.320 So that's a very visual declaration of independence.

00:28:46.720 If you're an American, it's very visual.

00:28:48.340 Because you've been trained with all those images.

00:28:51.020 So that's good persuasion.

00:28:52.220 And then he's packaging the addiction

00:28:55.820 and fentanyl argument into finance and TikTok.

00:28:59.800 And I like all of that.

00:29:02.040 That's all good persuasion.

00:29:04.400 And it was so good.

00:29:05.300 And because I'm a single-issue voter,

00:29:07.140 I retweeted his request for campaign donations.

00:29:10.620 So we'll see how he does.

00:29:14.420 Now here's something interesting.

00:29:16.460 RFK Jr. is making great, interesting stories.

00:29:20.080 So one story is that he's still saying in public

00:29:24.360 that he believes the CIA was involved

00:29:27.540 in killing President Kennedy, his uncle.

00:29:31.980 Now, apparently he refers to tons of evidence

00:29:37.200 that was collected that all points in the same direction.

00:29:39.520 But the story that really got my attention

00:29:42.580 was that according to RFK Jr.,

00:29:46.720 RFK, when the president was assassinated,

00:29:51.880 the president's brother,

00:29:53.300 who was already attorney general, right?

00:29:56.420 He was attorney general at the time?

00:29:59.060 The attorney general of the United States,

00:30:01.260 according to RFK Jr.,

00:30:02.980 called his contacts at the CIA

00:30:05.660 to ask if they did it

00:30:07.860 because he believed that was the most obvious

00:30:11.460 people who did it.

00:30:14.560 Just hold that in your mind.

00:30:17.000 I'm not saying that the CIA did it.

00:30:19.500 I'm not saying they did.

00:30:21.720 I'm saying that the attorney general believed they did.

00:30:24.680 You could even take out the part

00:30:29.640 where they did or they did not.

00:30:32.320 The person who knew the most

00:30:34.100 about how the country really works

00:30:36.500 is the attorney general.

00:30:39.460 I would argue that no one knows

00:30:41.280 more than the attorney general

00:30:42.640 how shit really works in the real world.

00:30:46.480 Am I wrong?

00:30:47.060 There's nobody who understands

00:30:49.360 the real workings of the government

00:30:51.480 better than the attorney general.

00:30:54.380 And the attorney general

00:30:55.860 thought the CAA probably killed his brother,

00:31:00.640 the president of the United States.

00:31:02.940 Just hold that in your head for a minute.

00:31:06.500 And that, as of today,

00:31:08.980 RFK Jr. still believes it

00:31:10.680 and also believes that the evidence

00:31:13.140 is very clear and convincing,

00:31:15.160 enough so that he's got some confidence

00:31:18.420 in saying it.

00:31:19.700 And he's not crazy, right?

00:31:22.220 He has proven himself to be a good,

00:31:24.160 you know, analyst of complicated stuff.

00:31:28.040 So that's just amazing.

00:31:30.860 It just blows my mind.

00:31:33.000 And then when we saw

00:31:34.160 that the intelligence agents,

00:31:35.940 you know, did their fake letter

00:31:37.740 about the Hunter laptop,

00:31:40.560 you say to yourself,

00:31:41.720 has anything changed?

00:31:45.160 Has anything changed?

00:31:48.100 And then you ask yourself,

00:31:49.380 who told Sidney Powell

00:31:51.140 that there was a Kraken coming

00:31:53.120 and it had something to do

00:31:54.300 with Venezuela election machines

00:31:58.320 and some general in Venezuela?

00:32:00.380 Where do you think that came from?

00:32:04.700 Who knows?

00:32:06.260 But if that did not come

00:32:07.420 from some intelligence agency

00:32:08.880 in the United States,

00:32:09.900 I'd be really surprised.

00:32:11.740 Don't know.

00:32:12.820 Don't know for sure.

00:32:13.700 But I'd be really surprised

00:32:15.880 if that's not them.

00:32:18.120 All right.

00:32:20.980 So we do have a problem

00:32:22.520 in this country

00:32:23.160 is that we don't know

00:32:24.180 who's running the country.

00:32:26.340 It's kind of a big problem, isn't it?

00:32:28.860 I honestly don't know.

00:32:31.780 Because we say,

00:32:33.000 we tell ourselves

00:32:33.760 it's the Democrats, right?

00:32:35.460 It's Obama and whatever.

00:32:37.660 But I actually don't know.

00:32:39.180 Like legitimately.

00:32:41.600 Honestly, legitimately,

00:32:42.640 I don't know.

00:32:44.040 I don't know if the Democrats

00:32:45.220 or Republicans

00:32:46.380 or anybody is in charge.

00:32:47.580 It could be entirely the CIA.

00:32:52.040 It could be.

00:32:53.540 Just don't know.

00:32:55.340 All right.

00:32:55.660 Or they just,

00:32:56.380 or they just anticipate,

00:32:57.820 it could be that the CIA

00:32:59.060 just participates

00:33:00.240 in lots of things

00:33:00.980 you don't know about,

00:33:01.960 but that would be short

00:33:03.080 of controlling everything.

00:33:04.020 All right.

00:33:06.440 We'll talk more about

00:33:07.460 RFK Jr. in a minute.

00:33:09.900 Well, right now, how about?

00:33:11.000 He also was called out

00:33:14.520 in some interview

00:33:15.700 about his opinions

00:33:17.060 on hydroxychloroquine.

00:33:19.700 And the nature of the questions was,

00:33:23.240 hey, you conspiracy theory nut job,

00:33:26.640 you've been saying

00:33:27.320 that hydroxychloroquine,

00:33:28.820 you know,

00:33:29.560 might actually work,

00:33:30.840 but all the science

00:33:31.840 says it doesn't.

00:33:33.880 And I had never heard anybody

00:33:35.680 give a really good answer to that.

00:33:37.580 I'd never heard anybody

00:33:39.080 who was pro-hydroxychloroquine

00:33:41.680 who explained their position

00:33:44.300 as well as he did.

00:33:46.320 So I'm still in the camp of

00:33:48.880 the evidence does not show it works.

00:33:51.960 But maybe it doesn't show

00:33:53.400 it doesn't work either.

00:33:55.040 So his claim goes this.

00:33:58.300 And I'm not going to back his claim.

00:34:00.280 I'm just going to say

00:34:00.960 it's the best explanation

00:34:02.580 that I've heard.

00:34:03.960 That if you looked at

00:34:05.740 all the hydroxychloroquine states,

00:34:08.020 there are three big,

00:34:10.260 randomized, controlled trials

00:34:11.680 that look like the good ones.

00:34:14.040 The good ones show

00:34:15.480 it definitely doesn't work,

00:34:17.580 meaning that the deaths

00:34:19.220 were greater in the treated group

00:34:20.900 than the untreated group.

00:34:23.260 Did you know that?

00:34:24.560 That the three real, solid,

00:34:26.860 randomized, controlled trials

00:34:28.260 just show higher death

00:34:30.640 if you use it.

00:34:31.380 But here's what RFK Jr.

00:34:34.500 points out about

00:34:35.120 those three studies.

00:34:36.980 They all used the same dosage rate

00:34:39.000 and it was all wildly beyond

00:34:42.360 what any reasonable doctor

00:34:43.620 would give somebody

00:34:44.320 because you know it would kill them

00:34:45.700 or you know it would put them

00:34:48.340 at risk for death.

00:34:50.120 So the only thing that was tested

00:34:52.360 in those high-quality studies

00:34:55.100 was a toxic level of it.

00:34:56.940 Now, I've heard other people say,

00:35:02.260 of course,

00:35:03.440 that the studies were designed to fail.

00:35:06.160 They've been hearing that forever, right?

00:35:07.920 So that, so that, so far,

00:35:09.360 this is just the common argument.

00:35:11.420 The studies are bad.

00:35:12.660 The studies were designed to fail.

00:35:14.460 But here, here's why

00:35:15.760 his argument is stronger.

00:35:17.920 He said, he points out in detail

00:35:20.200 the three studies,

00:35:21.320 tells you that all three of them

00:35:23.080 used the same dose level,

00:35:24.320 which automatically is very suspicious

00:35:26.940 because the dose level

00:35:29.060 that all three of them used

00:35:30.400 was something that an ordinary doctor

00:35:34.300 would look at and say,

00:35:35.300 oh, no, that's way too much.

00:35:40.760 Where did that come from?

00:35:42.860 It seems like a little bit

00:35:43.980 too much of a coincidence

00:35:45.000 that the three trials

00:35:47.000 that were the good ones,

00:35:48.500 the ones with a lot of money behind them,

00:35:51.260 that those are the ones

00:35:52.120 where they did a toxic level test.

00:35:54.980 Now, as RFK Jr. says,

00:35:56.680 if you take those three

00:35:57.780 out of the meta-studies

00:35:59.880 and the meta-analysis

00:36:01.880 would look at all the studies

00:36:03.120 that are flawed,

00:36:05.120 but if you look at all the flawed studies,

00:36:07.340 if they're flawed in different ways,

00:36:09.440 you hope that those different ways

00:36:10.760 cancel out each other

00:36:11.940 and maybe you can tell something.

00:36:14.040 His argument is,

00:36:14.860 if you take out the three studies

00:36:16.620 that are clearly wrong,

00:36:19.440 you end up with something

00:36:22.200 that looks like a positive result.

00:36:24.420 What do you think of that argument?

00:36:26.960 Do you see any weakness in the argument?

00:36:31.820 Well, I do.

00:36:34.480 Let me explain the weakness in the argument.

00:36:37.400 A meta-study is a study of all studies.

00:36:41.040 But do you know what people usually do

00:36:43.020 when they do a meta-study?

00:36:44.060 They say, well, all of the studies

00:36:46.880 are maybe a little bit weak

00:36:48.380 or flawed or underpowered.

00:36:50.540 But when we add them together,

00:36:52.920 you know, that'll tell us something.

00:36:54.820 But there's something they do

00:36:56.020 before they add them together.

00:36:57.420 Do you know what that is?

00:37:00.120 They use their judgment

00:37:01.980 to decide which ones

00:37:03.420 to remove from the study

00:37:04.840 because those ones are just so bad.

00:37:06.900 They have to be removed.

00:37:09.360 In other words,

00:37:10.860 it's not science.

00:37:11.780 If it were science,

00:37:15.260 I might back it.

00:37:16.140 It's not science.

00:37:17.340 There's somebody who says,

00:37:19.080 I will use my human judgment,

00:37:20.640 not science,

00:37:21.680 not science.

00:37:22.760 I'll use my human judgment

00:37:24.100 because I know a little something

00:37:25.840 about this study,

00:37:27.020 but I know less about the other studies.

00:37:30.180 So just because I randomly

00:37:32.060 know more about this study

00:37:33.500 and I know it's bad,

00:37:34.780 I'll take it out.

00:37:36.680 That's not science.

00:37:37.880 That's not even close.

00:37:41.860 So if you want to tell yourself

00:37:43.800 that the science shows

00:37:45.740 that hydroxychloroquine works,

00:37:47.740 that is false

00:37:48.860 because a meta-analysis

00:37:51.540 is not science.

00:37:52.980 If you want to use a,

00:37:54.460 if you want to say

00:37:55.160 that the science shows

00:37:56.600 hydroxychloroquine does work,

00:37:59.860 that's not science either.

00:38:00.940 So basically the mistake

00:38:03.780 that RFK Jr. points out correctly,

00:38:07.800 which is some of these big studies

00:38:09.340 have an obvious problem.

00:38:11.680 What about the ones that are left?

00:38:14.260 They all have obvious problems.

00:38:16.660 So it's basically nothing

00:38:17.840 but studies that are bad.

00:38:19.980 How many bad studies

00:38:21.160 can you add up

00:38:21.780 to get a good study?

00:38:23.340 I think the answer is

00:38:24.300 that's not a thing.

00:38:25.180 So while I would agree

00:38:29.160 that his defense

00:38:31.540 of hydroxychloroquine

00:38:32.940 is the best I've seen.

00:38:35.620 For a short, tight,

00:38:38.540 public defense,

00:38:40.580 pretty solid.

00:38:41.640 Pretty good job.

00:38:42.320 He's persuasive.

00:38:43.700 But I'm not persuaded.

00:38:46.300 So to his credit,

00:38:48.700 to his credit,

00:38:50.200 he only points at the evidence.

00:38:53.020 He describes the evidence.

00:38:56.180 You're still left

00:38:57.440 with the question

00:38:58.180 of does it work

00:38:58.880 or does it not.

00:39:00.160 But his criticism

00:39:01.920 of how we decided

00:39:03.280 it doesn't work

00:39:04.180 is valid.

00:39:11.640 So I'm going to give him

00:39:13.100 three quarters credit

00:39:14.240 for a valid analysis.

00:39:16.540 But I think there's

00:39:17.700 another level

00:39:18.640 of uncertainty.

00:39:21.900 So that was interesting.

00:39:26.080 All right.

00:39:27.340 I think it's still hilarious

00:39:28.780 that reparations

00:39:29.780 are being taken serious,

00:39:31.420 seriously by anybody,

00:39:33.180 the California stuff.

00:39:34.660 And I've seen, you know,

00:39:35.920 tweets, people saying,

00:39:37.900 actually, Robert Malone.

00:39:40.520 You know Dr. Malone,

00:39:42.220 famous from COVID days?

00:39:45.220 Dr. Malone basically said,

00:39:47.360 unless you're a person of color,

00:39:48.540 you should get out

00:39:49.160 of California

00:39:49.800 because of the reparations thing.

00:39:53.300 Can you believe that?

00:39:54.740 That, like, Dr. Malone,

00:39:57.080 one of the most famous people

00:39:58.360 on social media lately,

00:40:00.180 he just said,

00:40:00.840 if you're not a person of color,

00:40:02.940 you should get out

00:40:03.460 of California.

00:40:04.560 Does that sound like

00:40:05.600 anything that somebody else said?

00:40:09.040 Does that sound like,

00:40:10.340 that reminds me of something?

00:40:12.880 Something, something.

00:40:13.780 It's not coming to me.

00:40:19.280 But I can't believe

00:40:21.880 that we're letting this prank

00:40:24.360 go on so long.

00:40:26.360 Doesn't it feel like a prank

00:40:27.640 on black people?

00:40:30.020 They really think

00:40:30.940 they're going to get reparations.

00:40:33.120 You know that's not going

00:40:34.200 to happen, right?

00:40:35.560 Is there even one person

00:40:36.780 on this live stream

00:40:37.620 who thinks they're going

00:40:38.320 to get reparations?

00:40:39.840 At least the way

00:40:40.760 it was described

00:40:41.500 where taxpayers

00:40:42.860 just give them

00:40:43.780 a bunch of money

00:40:44.400 and a check.

00:40:46.700 Now, even if it's spread

00:40:47.960 out over time

00:40:48.940 or anything,

00:40:49.780 no, it's not going

00:40:50.680 to happen.

00:40:51.640 And the reason that,

00:40:52.540 you know why it's not

00:40:53.100 going to happen?

00:40:56.040 It's too far.

00:40:58.900 It's way too far.

00:40:59.980 And it's just not

00:41:02.480 going to happen.

00:41:04.540 Now, if it did happen,

00:41:05.960 I would move

00:41:06.680 out of California.

00:41:07.680 And so would a lot

00:41:08.780 of people.

00:41:10.020 It would just end

00:41:11.260 the state.

00:41:12.320 It would be,

00:41:13.340 there's no way

00:41:14.200 that Newsom

00:41:14.820 could be considered

00:41:15.660 a serious national

00:41:18.020 candidate

00:41:18.500 if California

00:41:20.100 pays reparations.

00:41:21.380 That's the end.

00:41:23.560 Would you agree

00:41:24.300 that there's no way

00:41:25.160 that Newsom

00:41:26.840 could become

00:41:27.380 a national politician,

00:41:28.820 run for president,

00:41:29.980 if reparations

00:41:31.720 go through

00:41:32.660 under his watch?

00:41:33.820 Would you agree?

00:41:35.100 That takes him out

00:41:36.140 from being

00:41:36.540 a national politician.

00:41:39.100 Yeah.

00:41:40.480 And I don't think

00:41:41.500 he can stand for that

00:41:42.640 because he does,

00:41:43.540 it looks like

00:41:44.000 he has some ambitions there.

00:41:45.760 So,

00:41:46.540 I feel it's cruel

00:41:48.800 and probably dangerous

00:41:50.020 to let black people

00:41:51.360 imagine that this

00:41:52.440 is going to happen.

00:41:53.660 And their imaginations

00:41:54.820 have been taken,

00:41:56.280 I would say,

00:41:57.640 unethically too far.

00:42:00.980 To let them imagine

00:42:03.140 that this is serious

00:42:04.420 or that anybody's

00:42:05.820 not laughing about them

00:42:06.880 behind their backs,

00:42:08.100 you know,

00:42:08.240 I'm talking about

00:42:08.720 the reparation committee,

00:42:10.660 to imagine,

00:42:12.280 yeah,

00:42:12.500 now remember,

00:42:13.840 I told you that

00:42:14.540 the biggest problem

00:42:15.720 that black Americans

00:42:16.880 have,

00:42:18.320 in my opinion,

00:42:19.720 is that they've

00:42:21.360 trained people

00:42:22.040 not to tell them

00:42:22.900 the truth.

00:42:24.620 Right?

00:42:25.140 Look how many

00:42:26.420 black Americans

00:42:27.100 are completely

00:42:27.720 wasting their time

00:42:28.640 on this

00:42:29.120 because there's

00:42:30.520 no white American

00:42:31.400 who will tell them,

00:42:32.200 look them in the eye

00:42:32.760 and say,

00:42:33.420 you know,

00:42:33.800 you can study it

00:42:34.500 all you want.

00:42:35.560 It's not going to

00:42:36.140 fucking happen.

00:42:37.720 Not as long

00:42:38.460 as I'm alive.

00:42:41.640 Do you know

00:42:42.760 how much energy

00:42:43.760 I would put

00:42:44.300 into stopping this?

00:42:46.460 Yeah,

00:42:46.760 this is like

00:42:47.540 clear your calendar

00:42:48.620 kind of stuff.

00:42:50.420 Yeah.

00:42:51.140 No,

00:42:51.460 this is not going to happen.

00:42:53.220 This is not going to happen.

00:42:55.620 And nobody will

00:42:56.340 tell black Americans

00:42:57.760 anything honest.

00:43:00.040 Do you think

00:43:00.520 it's in their best interest

00:43:01.780 to spend a bunch of time

00:43:03.320 convincing themselves

00:43:04.680 that this is going to happen?

00:43:06.580 It's terrible for them.

00:43:08.700 It's not good for me,

00:43:10.520 but it's even worse for them.

00:43:12.740 For me,

00:43:13.400 it probably has no impact at all

00:43:14.780 because it's not going to happen.

00:43:16.680 For them,

00:43:17.440 they're going to get all

00:43:18.420 worked up,

00:43:19.920 they're spending all this time.

00:43:21.220 It's for nothing.

00:43:22.540 It's all for nothing.

00:43:24.280 And do you know why

00:43:24.980 the white politicians

00:43:26.660 let you do it?

00:43:28.580 Because they couldn't

00:43:29.320 tell you the truth.

00:43:31.340 That's why.

00:43:32.040 Because you've trained us,

00:43:33.560 you've trained white people

00:43:34.520 to lie to you.

00:43:35.880 So they did.

00:43:37.300 You got exactly

00:43:38.160 what you asked for.

00:43:39.900 Now,

00:43:40.260 so far,

00:43:40.840 you might think it's working.

00:43:41.860 It's like,

00:43:42.060 we're getting exactly

00:43:42.900 what we asked for.

00:43:43.900 We've got this

00:43:44.660 reparations committee.

00:43:45.620 This is going well.

00:43:47.700 No, it's not.

00:43:48.720 It's a white trick.

00:43:50.960 Trust me,

00:43:51.540 I know white tricks.

00:43:55.220 It's just to study it

00:43:56.800 to make it look ridiculous

00:43:57.880 so it's easier

00:43:59.100 to turn it down.

00:44:00.580 Now,

00:44:01.080 the best thing

00:44:01.620 that happened

00:44:02.580 from Nusen's perspective

00:44:03.920 is that the recommendations

00:44:05.140 are absurd.

00:44:06.920 And I think he knew that.

00:44:08.700 I think he knew

00:44:09.280 the recommendations

00:44:09.980 would be absurd.

00:44:11.260 So it's easier

00:44:12.080 to turn down

00:44:12.660 something that's absurd,

00:44:14.140 but even better,

00:44:15.140 he doesn't have to

00:44:15.740 turn it down,

00:44:16.340 does he?

00:44:17.660 No.

00:44:18.400 He can send them back

00:44:19.580 to study it better.

00:44:22.500 And he can just

00:44:23.320 keep doing it.

00:44:25.580 Do you think

00:44:26.220 there's any end

00:44:27.080 to how long

00:44:28.500 he can put them off?

00:44:30.200 Just say,

00:44:30.560 you know,

00:44:31.540 your committee

00:44:33.200 recommendation

00:44:33.720 is interesting.

00:44:34.920 We're going to have

00:44:35.380 to commission

00:44:35.900 a committee

00:44:36.300 to look at it.

00:44:38.760 All right.

00:44:39.400 So that's what's

00:44:40.000 happening there.

00:44:40.520 So I told you

00:44:42.540 about Kanakoa

00:44:43.980 the Great's thread,

00:44:45.480 where at 2013

00:44:47.380 something suddenly

00:44:48.500 happened in the media

00:44:49.400 and words such as

00:44:51.340 white privilege

00:44:52.680 and systemic racism

00:44:53.960 went from

00:44:55.400 hardly ever being used

00:44:56.800 in history

00:44:57.300 to all the media

00:44:59.480 was using it

00:45:00.120 all the time.

00:45:00.900 Just massive spike

00:45:02.240 in 2013

00:45:03.580 and then

00:45:04.340 continuing on.

00:45:07.300 So why?

00:45:10.520 So I asked,

00:45:12.200 so the easy answer

00:45:14.280 is that the media

00:45:15.100 did it.

00:45:16.720 And the easier answer

00:45:18.140 is that the media

00:45:18.940 model changed

00:45:19.880 so that,

00:45:20.440 you know,

00:45:21.180 provocation

00:45:21.780 got you more clicks.

00:45:23.240 And it's just because

00:45:24.680 the internet exists.

00:45:26.240 But I think

00:45:26.600 the internet existed

00:45:27.900 before 2013.

00:45:30.820 And I think that

00:45:32.080 here's what I think.

00:45:36.560 I saw a bunch

00:45:37.680 of anti-Semitic people

00:45:38.880 saying,

00:45:39.260 Scott,

00:45:40.640 when you say

00:45:41.600 the media,

00:45:43.480 are you catching on?

00:45:46.160 Are you catching on?

00:45:48.060 Wink, wink.

00:45:49.200 The media.

00:45:50.960 George Soros.

00:45:52.520 The media.

00:45:53.460 Are you catching it now?

00:45:54.680 Are you getting it?

00:45:55.340 Wink, wink.

00:45:56.220 No, that's not

00:45:57.140 where I'm going.

00:45:58.460 I do not believe.

00:46:00.020 And I,

00:46:00.340 you know,

00:46:00.740 I've been behind

00:46:01.440 the curtain enough

00:46:03.380 to know when

00:46:04.860 something's complete bullshit.

00:46:06.800 Here's what's not happening.

00:46:08.020 Here's what,

00:46:09.800 what's not happening

00:46:10.780 is the,

00:46:11.320 the Jewish leaders

00:46:13.640 of media companies

00:46:14.660 all getting together

00:46:16.180 and saying,

00:46:16.780 let's do some

00:46:17.280 Jewish conspiracy stuff.

00:46:19.520 That's not happening.

00:46:21.740 That's not happening.

00:46:24.280 You don't think

00:46:25.180 I would know about that?

00:46:27.820 Seriously.

00:46:29.160 I mean,

00:46:29.820 I lived and breathed

00:46:31.600 completely in that world.

00:46:33.580 Publishing,

00:46:34.940 right?

00:46:35.140 Media and publishing,

00:46:36.660 that's where I live.

00:46:37.900 It's the most

00:46:38.460 Jewish environment

00:46:39.560 you could ever be in.

00:46:40.960 You don't think

00:46:41.540 I would have any hint

00:46:42.680 that it was a massive

00:46:44.320 Jewish conspiracy

00:46:45.400 if there really was one.

00:46:47.820 You don't think

00:46:48.460 I would have picked up

00:46:49.120 on that

00:46:49.520 in, like,

00:46:51.300 decades

00:46:51.820 of being completely

00:46:53.400 immersed

00:46:53.800 in that environment?

00:46:56.020 It's not a thing.

00:46:58.040 It's not a thing.

00:46:59.420 There's a correlation,

00:47:01.200 right?

00:47:01.500 There's a high

00:47:02.520 percentage

00:47:03.440 of Jewish

00:47:04.440 owners and managers

00:47:06.160 and stuff

00:47:06.660 in the media.

00:47:07.960 But

00:47:08.080 to imagine

00:47:09.860 that therefore

00:47:10.780 they're all coordinating,

00:47:13.300 that's not how

00:47:14.000 anything works.

00:47:15.540 You could also say

00:47:16.820 that

00:47:17.220 most of the media

00:47:19.080 managers are male,

00:47:20.840 which I think

00:47:22.040 is still true.

00:47:23.360 But is it

00:47:24.220 a male conspiracy?

00:47:27.200 So,

00:47:27.640 a whole bunch

00:47:28.080 of men in the media,

00:47:28.980 right?

00:47:29.140 But are the men

00:47:30.180 coordinating

00:47:31.920 to get one over

00:47:33.440 on the women

00:47:34.000 and the LGBTQs

00:47:36.220 because they're

00:47:36.940 outnumbered?

00:47:38.820 That's not happening.

00:47:40.340 There are

00:47:40.940 other reasons,

00:47:43.400 external reasons

00:47:44.240 why there were

00:47:44.760 a lot of men

00:47:45.280 in media.

00:47:47.180 And that's it.

00:47:49.000 It's not part

00:47:49.920 of a conspiracy

00:47:50.540 of men

00:47:51.400 against women.

00:47:52.260 It's not a conspiracy

00:47:53.200 of Jewish media

00:47:54.940 owners

00:47:55.300 against anybody

00:47:56.000 else.

00:47:56.360 Now,

00:47:57.500 are there

00:47:57.920 individual members

00:47:59.480 that own the media

00:48:00.460 who have

00:48:01.080 a love of Israel?

00:48:04.040 Sure.

00:48:05.700 Sure.

00:48:06.780 Pretty normal.

00:48:08.640 But it's not

00:48:09.480 some giant conspiracy.

00:48:12.640 So,

00:48:13.260 who do you think

00:48:14.920 is behind

00:48:15.500 the sudden

00:48:16.200 media spike?

00:48:19.020 What's your guess?

00:48:20.520 Sudden media

00:48:21.340 spike in

00:48:22.460 interest.

00:48:26.360 Do you think,

00:48:27.220 well,

00:48:27.480 let me ask you

00:48:27.960 the first one.

00:48:28.400 Do you think

00:48:28.780 it was organic?

00:48:30.840 And organic

00:48:31.540 would include

00:48:32.380 the algorithms

00:48:34.120 changed

00:48:34.820 so people

00:48:35.440 just naturally

00:48:36.240 wanted more

00:48:37.480 of it

00:48:37.800 and then the media

00:48:38.580 just gave them

00:48:39.180 more of what

00:48:39.540 they clicked on.

00:48:40.920 Is it organic?

00:48:43.480 It doesn't feel

00:48:44.420 organic,

00:48:44.960 does it?

00:48:45.620 Some say

00:48:46.220 the colleges,

00:48:47.940 but the colleges

00:48:49.040 doesn't explain

00:48:50.180 the 2013 spike

00:48:51.720 because it's

00:48:52.340 too sudden.

00:48:52.860 college would

00:48:54.620 be more

00:48:54.980 of a long

00:48:56.320 burn.

00:49:00.940 To me,

00:49:01.640 there's only

00:49:01.980 one thing

00:49:02.420 that could

00:49:02.720 do this.

00:49:06.500 Only one

00:49:07.220 thing.

00:49:08.880 The CIA.

00:49:11.420 I don't think

00:49:12.180 anything else

00:49:12.720 could do it.

00:49:14.820 And is there

00:49:15.520 any history

00:49:16.020 in this country

00:49:16.660 of the CIA

00:49:17.800 manipulating

00:49:18.800 the media?

00:49:23.080 Yeah.

00:49:24.740 It's like

00:49:25.380 one of their

00:49:25.760 primary functions.

00:49:27.820 And correct me

00:49:28.520 if I'm wrong,

00:49:29.260 it's completely

00:49:29.900 legal, right?

00:49:32.620 At the moment,

00:49:33.620 it's completely

00:49:34.240 legal for the CIA

00:49:35.340 to manipulate

00:49:36.980 our media

00:49:37.940 and our minds.

00:49:39.760 Am I wrong?

00:49:41.120 It's not illegal.

00:49:43.100 And here's how

00:49:44.260 it would happen.

00:49:44.820 It would happen

00:49:46.600 like this.

00:49:48.060 Somebody in

00:49:48.940 the agency

00:49:49.520 would talk

00:49:51.640 to a publisher

00:49:52.960 and say,

00:49:54.660 hey,

00:49:55.720 I'd really

00:49:56.200 like to see

00:49:56.840 more stories

00:49:57.500 of this type.

00:50:00.140 And then

00:50:00.660 the publisher

00:50:03.140 of the newspaper

00:50:03.680 says,

00:50:04.740 oh,

00:50:04.980 I don't think

00:50:05.480 so.

00:50:06.780 Right?

00:50:07.080 I don't see

00:50:07.700 a market

00:50:08.080 for that.

00:50:08.800 That feels

00:50:10.060 like more

00:50:12.560 of a narrative

00:50:13.180 than news.

00:50:13.920 And then

00:50:15.020 what does

00:50:15.360 the CIA

00:50:15.840 say?

00:50:17.480 Well,

00:50:18.300 you know,

00:50:19.480 we have

00:50:19.840 helped you

00:50:20.240 in the past

00:50:20.860 quite a few

00:50:21.540 times.

00:50:22.600 Well,

00:50:23.120 yes,

00:50:23.420 but what

00:50:23.700 you're asking

00:50:24.160 is sort

00:50:24.940 of unreasonable.

00:50:26.400 Yeah,

00:50:26.740 yeah,

00:50:27.060 you know,

00:50:27.300 and in the

00:50:27.660 future,

00:50:28.520 we would be

00:50:28.980 very friendly

00:50:29.540 with you

00:50:29.960 as well.

00:50:31.020 There could

00:50:31.400 be opportunities

00:50:32.100 that open

00:50:32.640 for you.

00:50:34.360 Yeah.

00:50:35.000 And if

00:50:35.720 those opportunities

00:50:37.160 didn't open,

00:50:37.940 well,

00:50:38.220 it's hard to

00:50:38.700 know what

00:50:38.960 would happen

00:50:39.280 to your

00:50:39.520 business.

00:50:39.880 you know,

00:50:42.140 so you

00:50:42.440 can imagine

00:50:43.000 that it's

00:50:44.700 not even

00:50:45.100 a threat.

00:50:46.660 It could

00:50:47.180 even be

00:50:47.580 less than

00:50:48.000 that.

00:50:48.300 It could

00:50:48.540 be just,

00:50:49.200 we'll give

00:50:49.520 you tips.

00:50:51.860 Here's the

00:50:52.400 deal.

00:50:53.380 You get

00:50:53.760 all of

00:50:54.120 your news

00:50:55.600 tips and

00:50:56.180 insider stuff

00:50:56.920 from us.

00:50:58.520 We've been

00:50:59.080 keeping you

00:50:59.560 in business.

00:51:01.220 We're just

00:51:01.840 asking for

00:51:02.340 this one

00:51:02.700 small thing.

00:51:04.340 Just give

00:51:04.940 us some

00:51:05.220 stories on

00:51:05.720 this topic.

00:51:06.180 Yeah.

00:51:13.200 All right.

00:51:14.160 So,

00:51:14.900 I don't

00:51:15.980 know what

00:51:16.500 caused that

00:51:17.000 massive spike.

00:51:18.140 I do think

00:51:19.060 that it could

00:51:19.520 be a change

00:51:20.060 in the

00:51:20.320 algorithms.

00:51:22.220 Somebody said

00:51:22.900 that Facebook

00:51:23.500 made some

00:51:24.020 kind of a

00:51:24.400 change around

00:51:24.940 that.

00:51:25.680 Maybe.

00:51:26.460 I think

00:51:27.040 that's a

00:51:27.640 possibility.

00:51:29.640 And then

00:51:29.840 the fact that

00:51:30.320 people click

00:51:30.940 makes more

00:51:31.680 of it,

00:51:32.180 et cetera.

00:51:32.760 So it

00:51:33.140 could be

00:51:33.380 just a bunch

00:51:33.880 of things

00:51:34.180 happen at

00:51:34.600 the same

00:51:34.920 time.

00:51:35.280 But I

00:51:36.180 would say

00:51:36.500 the rapidity

00:51:37.680 of it

00:51:38.160 suggests

00:51:39.400 an

00:51:39.980 intelligence

00:51:41.380 operation.

00:51:43.980 It's just

00:51:44.740 what it

00:51:45.000 looks like.

00:51:45.580 I have no

00:51:46.000 evidence beyond

00:51:46.660 that.

00:51:47.900 All right.

00:51:51.100 What else

00:51:51.860 we got here?

00:51:53.860 There's a

00:51:54.720 Rasmussen

00:51:56.140 poll on

00:51:58.260 RFK Jr.

00:51:58.980 And 53%

00:52:01.900 of Democrats

00:52:02.720 and 61%

00:52:04.900 of Republicans

00:52:05.720 have at

00:52:07.960 least a

00:52:08.380 somewhat

00:52:08.680 favorable

00:52:09.220 opinion

00:52:09.840 of RFK

00:52:10.600 Jr.

00:52:12.920 Did that

00:52:13.540 sound like

00:52:13.920 a typo?

00:52:15.380 Let me

00:52:15.900 say it

00:52:16.220 again and

00:52:16.660 watch your

00:52:17.020 head explode.

00:52:17.640 All right.

00:52:19.180 RFK Jr.

00:52:19.880 is a

00:52:20.280 Democrat.

00:52:21.780 That's

00:52:22.260 important to

00:52:22.720 the story.

00:52:23.200 He's a

00:52:23.460 Democrat.

00:52:24.620 53% of

00:52:25.800 Democrats

00:52:26.160 have a

00:52:26.620 favorable

00:52:26.960 opinion of

00:52:27.720 him.

00:52:28.240 But 61%

00:52:29.640 of Republicans

00:52:30.320 and 48%

00:52:33.300 have not

00:52:34.500 affiliated,

00:52:35.260 but those

00:52:36.300 are kind

00:52:36.560 of fake.

00:52:40.940 What's

00:52:41.540 going on

00:52:42.020 here?

00:52:43.040 Let me

00:52:43.500 ask you

00:52:43.800 this question.

00:52:46.080 If this

00:52:46.920 is true,

00:52:48.580 that more

00:52:49.120 Republicans

00:52:49.680 than Democrats

00:52:50.580 like RFK,

00:52:52.480 but more

00:52:53.480 than half

00:52:53.960 of the

00:52:54.400 Democrats

00:52:55.920 also like

00:52:56.660 him,

00:52:57.560 if he

00:52:58.520 got

00:52:58.760 nominated,

00:53:00.680 if,

00:53:02.280 how can

00:53:02.920 he lose?

00:53:05.920 I don't

00:53:06.520 think you

00:53:06.880 could lose

00:53:07.320 if 61%

00:53:08.320 of the

00:53:08.660 other team

00:53:09.160 thinks you're

00:53:09.680 pretty good.

00:53:11.440 Because your

00:53:12.100 own team is

00:53:12.660 going to

00:53:12.900 vote for

00:53:13.280 you for

00:53:13.600 sure,

00:53:14.000 right?

00:53:14.700 Because

00:53:14.940 they're just

00:53:15.280 not going

00:53:15.700 to want

00:53:15.920 the other

00:53:16.220 team.

00:53:17.500 So even

00:53:17.980 if RFK

00:53:19.020 Jr.

00:53:19.380 is not

00:53:19.660 their first

00:53:20.180 choice as

00:53:20.720 a Democrat,

00:53:21.300 they're all

00:53:21.720 going to

00:53:21.960 vote for

00:53:22.320 him.

00:53:23.300 It's

00:53:23.560 just

00:53:23.700 whoever

00:53:23.940 the

00:53:24.120 candidate

00:53:24.400 is.

00:53:25.480 Now,

00:53:26.060 that's

00:53:26.300 mostly

00:53:26.820 true of

00:53:27.260 Republicans,

00:53:27.880 but you

00:53:28.140 only need

00:53:28.580 a few

00:53:29.040 people to

00:53:29.640 cross over,

00:53:31.020 and it

00:53:31.520 looks like

00:53:31.880 he has

00:53:32.200 them.

00:53:33.200 It looks

00:53:33.600 like he

00:53:33.940 would actually

00:53:34.360 get a few

00:53:34.820 people to

00:53:35.220 cross over.

00:53:36.360 I can

00:53:37.000 tell you

00:53:37.340 that I've

00:53:37.760 heard

00:53:38.000 Republicans

00:53:38.760 who have

00:53:39.160 been

00:53:39.320 lifelong

00:53:39.740 Republicans

00:53:40.320 say,

00:53:41.500 this RFK

00:53:42.100 Jr.

00:53:42.460 is

00:53:42.540 interesting.

00:53:43.920 Have

00:53:44.120 you?

00:53:45.180 How many

00:53:45.820 of you

00:53:46.120 have heard

00:53:46.520 diehard

00:53:47.680 Republicans

00:53:48.240 and

00:53:48.600 conservatives

00:53:49.060 say that

00:53:50.140 they would

00:53:50.440 give him

00:53:50.800 a look?

00:53:51.940 They would

00:53:52.180 just give

00:53:52.520 him a look?

00:53:53.560 This is

00:53:54.620 completely

00:53:55.200 different than

00:53:56.660 anything you've

00:53:57.580 seen in

00:53:57.920 politics in

00:53:58.620 a long

00:53:59.240 time.

00:54:00.120 I would

00:54:00.640 say since

00:54:01.080 Obama,

00:54:01.600 at least.

00:54:02.840 Obama was

00:54:03.500 like that

00:54:03.960 in a

00:54:04.260 sense,

00:54:05.020 because I

00:54:06.100 think there

00:54:06.600 were people

00:54:07.040 who were

00:54:07.360 more

00:54:07.600 conservative

00:54:08.040 who said,

00:54:08.560 you know

00:54:08.700 what?

00:54:09.380 I'm going

00:54:09.700 to give

00:54:09.940 him a

00:54:10.200 look.

00:54:11.460 I'm just

00:54:11.800 going to

00:54:12.000 give him

00:54:12.220 a look.

00:54:12.580 And

00:54:14.720 RFK Jr.

00:54:15.480 is in

00:54:15.720 that

00:54:15.920 category.

00:54:17.220 People

00:54:17.520 are

00:54:17.680 willing

00:54:17.880 to give

00:54:18.260 him a

00:54:18.500 look.

00:54:18.680 Now,

00:54:19.260 it does

00:54:19.520 make sense

00:54:20.140 because he

00:54:21.120 was

00:54:21.640 compatible

00:54:22.880 on the

00:54:23.620 COVID

00:54:24.020 vaccination

00:54:24.580 stuff.

00:54:25.920 He

00:54:26.400 believes

00:54:26.820 the CIA

00:54:27.400 killed

00:54:28.080 Kennedy.

00:54:29.640 That's

00:54:30.060 pretty

00:54:30.320 compatible

00:54:30.740 with

00:54:31.000 Republican

00:54:31.520 thinking,

00:54:32.300 at least

00:54:32.620 some

00:54:32.840 portion

00:54:33.260 of

00:54:33.400 Republicans.

00:54:33.820 he

00:54:36.260 believes

00:54:36.980 the

00:54:37.160 borders

00:54:37.520 should

00:54:37.840 be

00:54:38.260 tightened,

00:54:39.480 but he

00:54:40.380 seems like

00:54:40.840 he's

00:54:41.040 actually

00:54:41.300 serious

00:54:41.760 about

00:54:42.060 it,

00:54:43.320 because he

00:54:43.840 comes at

00:54:44.240 it from

00:54:44.520 a logical

00:54:45.300 place.

00:54:47.960 I don't

00:54:48.620 know.

00:54:50.060 This

00:54:50.300 guy's got

00:54:50.720 a lot

00:54:51.000 going for

00:54:51.580 him that

00:54:52.340 Republicans

00:54:52.980 are going

00:54:53.320 to appreciate.

00:54:54.240 Now,

00:54:54.560 there are

00:54:54.820 some big

00:54:55.280 wild cards.

00:54:57.360 I know

00:54:57.740 he's been

00:54:58.100 anti-nuclear

00:54:58.920 in the

00:54:59.340 past,

00:55:00.800 but I

00:55:01.160 have not

00:55:01.520 heard his

00:55:02.000 updated

00:55:02.540 nuclear

00:55:03.300 opinion.

00:55:03.820 And I

00:55:04.580 would

00:55:04.740 allow

00:55:05.040 for

00:55:05.240 people

00:55:05.480 to

00:55:05.640 change

00:55:05.900 their

00:55:06.040 opinion.

00:55:06.960 I

00:55:07.120 wouldn't

00:55:07.320 hold it

00:55:07.640 against

00:55:07.920 anybody.

00:55:08.860 If

00:55:09.060 anybody

00:55:09.380 went

00:55:09.620 from

00:55:10.060 anti-nuclear

00:55:12.380 to pro,

00:55:13.560 I would

00:55:14.160 only care

00:55:14.860 that they're

00:55:15.260 pro now,

00:55:16.580 and I

00:55:16.920 might even

00:55:17.340 give them

00:55:17.740 a benefit

00:55:18.200 for being

00:55:18.680 willing to

00:55:19.140 change

00:55:19.400 their

00:55:19.580 mind.

00:55:20.320 It

00:55:20.620 might

00:55:20.820 even

00:55:21.020 be

00:55:21.160 a

00:55:21.280 little

00:55:21.400 bit

00:55:21.560 of

00:55:21.660 a

00:55:21.800 plus.

00:55:23.620 So it

00:55:24.260 would

00:55:24.460 be

00:55:24.580 better

00:55:24.820 if

00:55:24.960 they'd

00:55:25.140 been

00:55:25.240 here

00:55:25.420 for

00:55:25.560 a

00:55:25.660 long

00:55:25.840 time,

00:55:26.540 but I

00:55:26.760 wouldn't

00:55:27.420 hold

00:55:27.600 it

00:55:27.720 against

00:55:28.000 anybody

00:55:28.360 that

00:55:28.580 they

00:55:28.720 got

00:55:28.940 here

00:55:29.140 eventually

00:55:29.540 on

00:55:30.160 nuclear.

00:55:30.980 So I'd

00:55:31.300 like to

00:55:31.500 hear his

00:55:31.680 update

00:55:31.980 on that.

00:55:32.540 I also

00:55:33.040 haven't

00:55:33.280 heard his

00:55:33.640 fentanyl

00:55:34.320 ideas,

00:55:36.440 and I'm

00:55:36.920 a single

00:55:37.260 issue

00:55:37.520 voter on

00:55:37.960 that,

00:55:38.280 so we'll

00:55:39.920 wait for

00:55:40.240 that.

00:55:42.040 At the

00:55:42.520 moment,

00:55:42.940 Vivek is

00:55:43.520 the strongest

00:55:44.020 on

00:55:44.780 fentanyl,

00:55:46.980 and so

00:55:47.360 he's got

00:55:47.780 my support.

00:55:53.540 I saw

00:55:54.220 a tweet

00:55:54.640 from

00:55:55.260 Ashley

00:55:56.820 St.

00:55:57.200 Clair,

00:55:57.460 and she

00:55:59.000 said

00:55:59.200 this,

00:56:00.300 doctors

00:56:00.680 hardly

00:56:01.040 have

00:56:01.260 ever

00:56:01.500 advised

00:56:01.940 women

00:56:02.280 that it

00:56:03.080 may be

00:56:03.440 their

00:56:03.680 birth

00:56:03.980 control

00:56:04.400 making

00:56:04.780 them

00:56:05.100 depressed

00:56:05.560 or even

00:56:06.080 suicidal,

00:56:07.040 despite

00:56:07.500 documented

00:56:08.140 risk of

00:56:08.820 both

00:56:09.160 on the

00:56:09.800 pill.

00:56:10.540 Instead,

00:56:11.120 they'll

00:56:11.300 describe

00:56:12.000 an

00:56:12.180 antidepressant

00:56:13.280 and that

00:56:16.260 will be

00:56:16.460 your

00:56:16.620 solution.

00:56:18.080 Imagine

00:56:18.580 being a

00:56:20.140 woman,

00:56:21.640 I guess

00:56:22.020 for some

00:56:22.440 of you

00:56:22.660 that's

00:56:22.900 easy,

00:56:23.880 and you're

00:56:24.780 on birth

00:56:25.200 control.

00:56:26.100 The birth

00:56:26.440 control makes

00:56:27.000 you sad

00:56:27.640 and they

00:56:28.080 give you

00:56:28.540 an

00:56:28.980 antidepressant,

00:56:31.000 you would

00:56:32.600 have no

00:56:33.080 libido

00:56:33.520 left.

00:56:34.860 She would

00:56:35.120 be capable

00:56:35.860 of not

00:56:36.300 getting

00:56:36.540 pregnant

00:56:37.020 two different

00:56:38.060 ways.

00:56:38.560 One is you

00:56:39.020 don't want

00:56:39.320 to have

00:56:39.500 any sex,

00:56:40.600 and the

00:56:40.800 other is if

00:56:41.180 you did,

00:56:41.500 you wouldn't

00:56:41.720 get pregnant.

00:56:43.280 Now,

00:56:43.940 this may be

00:56:44.640 curious enough

00:56:45.300 to do a

00:56:45.700 little searching

00:56:46.180 because I

00:56:46.680 said to

00:56:46.960 myself,

00:56:47.680 is it

00:56:48.180 true that

00:56:48.660 this link

00:56:49.160 is well

00:56:49.540 established?

00:56:50.620 What do

00:56:51.100 you think?

00:56:52.040 Do you

00:56:52.340 think it's

00:56:52.680 a well

00:56:53.060 established,

00:56:54.000 just a

00:56:54.580 medical

00:56:54.860 fact,

00:56:55.380 that birth

00:56:58.140 control is

00:56:58.980 associated with

00:56:59.720 depression?

00:57:02.880 And it

00:57:03.480 was something

00:57:03.720 like a 30%

00:57:04.860 greater rate or

00:57:05.640 something,

00:57:06.100 some big

00:57:06.580 number of

00:57:07.020 percentage

00:57:07.360 difference.

00:57:08.940 Well,

00:57:09.980 so then I

00:57:10.700 looked at one

00:57:11.700 article,

00:57:12.340 there was a

00:57:12.680 Denmark study,

00:57:14.060 and a big

00:57:14.760 study because

00:57:15.300 Denmark apparently

00:57:16.100 has good records

00:57:17.000 of stuff so you

00:57:17.660 can study things

00:57:18.420 there that you

00:57:19.280 can't study here,

00:57:19.900 and accordingly

00:57:21.440 they did find

00:57:22.180 a big

00:57:23.060 percentage

00:57:23.540 difference

00:57:24.120 of depression

00:57:25.900 of people

00:57:26.440 who had

00:57:26.980 any kind

00:57:27.920 of hormonal

00:57:29.580 birth control.

00:57:30.280 But here's

00:57:30.580 the weird

00:57:30.880 part,

00:57:32.000 it included

00:57:32.720 IUDs.

00:57:34.700 Apparently

00:57:35.160 people with

00:57:35.820 IUDs would

00:57:36.760 get depressed

00:57:38.320 as well as

00:57:39.000 people who

00:57:39.400 took a

00:57:39.880 chemical,

00:57:41.240 a pill.

00:57:42.920 Now,

00:57:43.360 that surprised

00:57:43.860 people.

00:57:45.120 But,

00:57:46.080 then I kept

00:57:46.680 reading,

00:57:47.260 and it

00:57:48.360 said that

00:57:48.960 normally

00:57:51.080 1.7

00:57:53.020 women

00:57:54.000 out of

00:57:54.400 100

00:57:54.740 would be

00:57:55.640 depressed.

00:57:57.560 So that

00:57:58.160 was their

00:57:58.460 baseline.

00:57:59.260 But it

00:57:59.640 went from

00:58:00.040 1.7

00:58:00.800 out of

00:58:01.040 100 to

00:58:01.500 2.2,

00:58:02.500 which as a

00:58:03.280 percentage is

00:58:03.920 a pretty big

00:58:04.340 difference,

00:58:05.820 but it's

00:58:06.200 still 2.2

00:58:06.940 out of

00:58:07.160 100.

00:58:09.260 There's

00:58:09.740 something wrong

00:58:10.300 with this

00:58:10.640 study,

00:58:10.960 isn't there?

00:58:12.600 Have you

00:58:12.940 ever met

00:58:13.940 100 women?

00:58:14.620 You think

00:58:17.400 if you

00:58:18.300 randomly pick

00:58:19.040 100 women

00:58:19.760 that only

00:58:20.980 2 of them

00:58:22.220 have

00:58:22.580 depression?

00:58:23.780 Just 2

00:58:24.660 out of

00:58:26.180 100.

00:58:27.740 Well,

00:58:28.380 maybe in

00:58:28.800 Denmark,

00:58:29.700 maybe they

00:58:31.660 shouldn't be

00:58:32.180 studying Denmark

00:58:33.080 so much.

00:58:34.360 I don't know.

00:58:35.060 Is that true

00:58:35.660 in Denmark

00:58:36.160 that only

00:58:36.860 2 out of

00:58:37.340 100 people

00:58:37.880 are depressed?

00:58:39.120 In the

00:58:39.800 United States,

00:58:40.440 it's at

00:58:40.740 least 30%.

00:58:41.740 Am I

00:58:42.280 wrong?

00:58:42.500 At least

00:58:44.740 a third

00:58:45.180 of women

00:58:45.640 would say

00:58:46.060 they're

00:58:46.280 depressed

00:58:46.780 or have

00:58:47.980 some

00:58:48.260 emotional

00:58:48.840 mental

00:58:49.580 problem.

00:58:51.000 And I

00:58:51.640 think that's

00:58:52.000 low.

00:58:52.560 It could

00:58:52.860 be way

00:58:53.180 more than

00:58:53.520 that.

00:58:55.580 So,

00:58:56.480 once again,

00:58:58.240 studies and

00:58:59.540 science look

00:59:00.200 worthless.

00:59:01.560 So,

00:59:02.180 I don't

00:59:02.380 think you

00:59:02.720 can say

00:59:03.040 anything

00:59:03.460 except that

00:59:05.700 to me it

00:59:06.240 seems obvious.

00:59:07.280 Here's my

00:59:07.820 argument for

00:59:08.400 why it's

00:59:09.040 obvious that

00:59:09.840 it would

00:59:10.020 make you

00:59:10.360 depressed.

00:59:10.800 this is

00:59:11.940 the least

00:59:12.560 medical

00:59:13.100 argument

00:59:13.540 you've

00:59:13.860 ever heard

00:59:14.220 in your

00:59:14.460 life.

00:59:15.680 There will

00:59:16.020 be no

00:59:16.420 science

00:59:16.940 in what

00:59:18.520 I say

00:59:18.880 next,

00:59:19.540 and I'm

00:59:20.080 still confident

00:59:20.700 of it.

00:59:21.880 No science,

00:59:23.120 no studies,

00:59:23.940 no data to

00:59:24.540 back it.

00:59:25.000 I'm still

00:59:25.380 confident.

00:59:26.000 It goes

00:59:26.300 like this.

00:59:27.760 The single

00:59:28.540 thing that

00:59:29.760 humans are

00:59:30.680 optimized for

00:59:31.780 by evolution

00:59:32.580 is what?

00:59:34.980 What's the

00:59:35.700 one thing

00:59:36.320 a human

00:59:37.040 reproduction?

00:59:38.600 We're only

00:59:39.520 optimized for

00:59:40.220 reproduction.

00:59:41.480 We're

00:59:41.740 basically

00:59:42.200 reproducers.

00:59:43.940 And it's

00:59:44.580 the only

00:59:44.860 thing evolution

00:59:46.340 cares about.

00:59:47.420 It only cares

00:59:48.140 about making

00:59:48.620 more of you.

00:59:49.800 Nothing else.

00:59:51.540 Just survival

00:59:52.280 and making

00:59:52.740 more.

00:59:54.200 Now,

00:59:54.940 if you take

00:59:56.360 your most

00:59:56.780 basic instinct,

00:59:58.680 which is your

00:59:59.440 reproductive instinct,

01:00:00.780 and you click

01:00:01.420 it off,

01:00:02.840 because your

01:00:03.900 body knows

01:00:04.440 it can't

01:00:04.800 make a baby,

01:00:06.320 how does

01:00:07.100 that not

01:00:07.880 affect your

01:00:08.600 mentality?

01:00:10.220 How could

01:00:10.860 that not

01:00:11.680 make you

01:00:12.480 feel like

01:00:12.920 you're not

01:00:13.280 an actual

01:00:13.800 human being

01:00:14.440 in the

01:00:14.720 world?

01:00:17.300 Your most

01:00:18.040 basic

01:00:18.680 biological

01:00:19.280 drive,

01:00:19.920 and they

01:00:20.120 turn it

01:00:20.420 off.

01:00:21.360 There's no

01:00:22.000 way that's

01:00:22.420 good for

01:00:22.780 you.

01:00:24.960 Is it?

01:00:26.560 Now,

01:00:27.180 again,

01:00:27.660 I have no

01:00:28.400 medical data

01:00:29.420 to back it.

01:00:30.420 It's not

01:00:30.860 based on my

01:00:31.580 advanced medical

01:00:32.620 degrees I don't

01:00:33.440 have.

01:00:34.360 There's no

01:00:35.000 science to it.

01:00:35.860 I'm just

01:00:37.120 saying,

01:00:38.040 isn't it

01:00:38.620 obvious?

01:00:40.340 Am I

01:00:40.920 wrong about

01:00:41.320 that?

01:00:41.720 To me,

01:00:42.120 that's so

01:00:42.580 obvious that

01:00:44.440 I wouldn't

01:00:44.780 even need to

01:00:45.320 study it.

01:00:46.060 If you turn

01:00:46.800 off your

01:00:47.160 most basic

01:00:47.920 instinct,

01:00:48.920 what's left?

01:00:50.420 Because you

01:00:50.820 never evolved,

01:00:53.200 humans did

01:00:53.900 not evolve to

01:00:54.740 be happy

01:00:55.320 outside of

01:00:56.480 their primary

01:00:57.160 drive.

01:00:59.140 That's why I

01:00:59.920 tell people if

01:01:00.560 they're trying

01:01:00.920 to be happy,

01:01:02.140 make sure you're

01:01:02.800 connected to the

01:01:03.620 reproductive process,

01:01:04.880 even if only

01:01:06.300 symbolically,

01:01:07.760 because at

01:01:08.100 least your

01:01:08.460 body and

01:01:08.980 brain will

01:01:09.480 be connected

01:01:11.240 symbolically,

01:01:12.080 and that might

01:01:12.460 be enough to

01:01:13.080 trigger some

01:01:13.700 happiness.

01:01:14.680 By symbolically,

01:01:15.540 I mean,

01:01:16.140 take my

01:01:16.980 example.

01:01:18.400 So being a

01:01:19.100 stepfather

01:01:19.960 connects me to

01:01:21.760 the whole

01:01:22.140 bringing up

01:01:22.900 children and

01:01:23.680 stuff without

01:01:24.860 actually being

01:01:26.300 a biological

01:01:26.860 parent.

01:01:28.200 So there are

01:01:28.720 other things

01:01:29.100 you can do.

01:01:29.700 Dating,

01:01:30.780 just being

01:01:31.940 dating,

01:01:32.740 trying to get

01:01:33.200 married,

01:01:34.140 trying to

01:01:34.500 have a

01:01:34.720 kid,

01:01:35.480 any of

01:01:35.900 those things

01:01:36.340 that are

01:01:36.800 contributing to

01:01:38.360 the reproductive

01:01:39.600 process probably

01:01:41.440 makes you

01:01:41.880 happy.

01:01:43.900 All other

01:01:44.700 things being

01:01:45.220 okay,

01:01:45.680 that's probably

01:01:46.100 what makes

01:01:46.480 you happy.

01:01:48.620 All right.

01:01:51.800 So the

01:01:52.460 walls are

01:01:52.940 closing in.

01:01:54.360 So Comer,

01:01:55.240 Representative

01:01:55.580 Comer,

01:01:56.040 says he's

01:01:56.420 got evidence

01:01:57.000 of the

01:01:57.780 Biden family

01:01:58.400 receiving money

01:01:59.240 in exchange

01:01:59.820 for policy

01:02:00.680 decisions.

01:02:02.500 And on

01:02:02.720 Wednesday,

01:02:03.140 we're going

01:02:03.400 to hear that

01:02:03.880 evidence.

01:02:05.600 Is anybody

01:02:06.660 prepared to

01:02:08.440 be disappointed

01:02:09.120 by the quality

01:02:09.900 of that

01:02:10.220 evidence?

01:02:12.020 Does anybody

01:02:12.980 think the

01:02:13.460 walls are

01:02:13.840 closing in

01:02:14.360 on Biden?

01:02:16.660 We have

01:02:17.460 one optimist

01:02:18.180 in the group.

01:02:20.240 I don't think

01:02:21.580 that optimism

01:02:22.220 is called

01:02:23.220 for.

01:02:24.400 I will

01:02:25.100 certainly pay

01:02:25.760 attention.

01:02:26.400 I will

01:02:26.800 listen to

01:02:27.240 that story.

01:02:27.740 Let me guess

01:02:29.340 what it's

01:02:29.700 going to

01:02:29.900 look like.

01:02:31.460 We found

01:02:32.460 a thing

01:02:33.020 which we

01:02:34.660 don't fully

01:02:35.260 understand,

01:02:36.400 could be

01:02:36.840 explained by

01:02:37.540 more than

01:02:37.940 one thing,

01:02:39.240 but one of

01:02:39.880 those things

01:02:40.420 that would

01:02:40.720 explain it

01:02:41.280 was that

01:02:42.240 he sold

01:02:42.820 something for

01:02:43.580 a policy

01:02:44.080 decision.

01:02:45.560 I feel like

01:02:46.600 there will be

01:02:46.960 more than

01:02:47.420 one explanation

01:02:48.600 for what we

01:02:49.340 see.

01:02:51.540 Yeah,

01:02:52.140 there will be

01:02:52.440 some plausible

01:02:53.060 deniability,

01:02:53.940 right?

01:02:54.100 So it

01:02:56.060 might convince

01:02:56.840 us as

01:02:57.940 voters,

01:02:58.480 it might

01:02:58.700 convince us

01:02:59.300 that there's

01:02:59.700 something there,

01:03:00.820 but I don't

01:03:01.300 think the

01:03:02.200 legal system

01:03:03.120 is going to

01:03:03.480 move on it.

01:03:06.120 Yeah,

01:03:06.620 we'll see.

01:03:08.440 I guess

01:03:09.100 Biden has

01:03:09.720 banned the

01:03:10.380 New York

01:03:11.040 Post from

01:03:11.920 some press

01:03:12.540 events upcoming

01:03:13.600 because they

01:03:15.040 were the

01:03:15.440 big Hunter

01:03:16.280 laptop story

01:03:17.320 people.

01:03:18.780 I don't know

01:03:19.200 if that's

01:03:19.520 true.

01:03:19.900 Maybe they

01:03:20.220 had some

01:03:20.500 other reason,

01:03:21.140 but it's

01:03:21.880 disturbing.

01:03:24.100 Are you

01:03:26.880 wondering how

01:03:27.420 hard it is to

01:03:28.180 move our

01:03:28.660 manufacturing from

01:03:29.580 China?

01:03:30.460 Well,

01:03:30.800 here's an

01:03:31.100 update.

01:03:32.260 India is

01:03:33.020 going hard

01:03:33.860 at trying

01:03:35.500 to become

01:03:35.980 the extra

01:03:37.820 place to

01:03:38.920 manufacture,

01:03:39.940 but in

01:03:41.160 case you

01:03:41.480 didn't know,

01:03:42.120 here are the

01:03:42.480 other countries

01:03:43.220 that are trying

01:03:43.980 to be that

01:03:44.740 China replacement

01:03:46.740 for manufacturing.

01:03:48.320 So India is

01:03:48.980 number one.

01:03:49.580 They're going

01:03:49.880 the hardest,

01:03:50.460 it looks like,

01:03:51.140 and having

01:03:52.040 the best

01:03:52.380 success,

01:03:52.840 but also

01:03:53.140 Mexico,

01:03:54.100 Vietnam,

01:03:56.560 and Malaysia.

01:03:59.020 So keep an

01:03:59.880 eye on those

01:04:00.400 three countries.

01:04:01.400 And the

01:04:01.800 fact that

01:04:02.220 Mexico is

01:04:02.960 one of

01:04:03.280 them,

01:04:05.160 I don't

01:04:05.880 know how

01:04:06.240 much effort

01:04:06.920 the United

01:04:07.560 States is

01:04:08.280 putting into

01:04:08.960 helping Mexico

01:04:10.560 become a

01:04:11.560 non-corrupt

01:04:12.380 place to do

01:04:13.180 business,

01:04:14.120 but I feel

01:04:16.220 like it's

01:04:16.580 the corruption

01:04:17.060 that's the

01:04:17.540 only thing

01:04:18.080 keeping Mexico

01:04:18.840 from being

01:04:19.300 the dominant

01:04:20.600 manufacturing hub.

01:04:22.160 Am I wrong

01:04:22.600 about that?

01:04:24.020 Well,

01:04:24.560 doesn't

01:04:25.040 Mexico have

01:04:25.680 everything?

01:04:28.060 I mean,

01:04:28.480 its proximity

01:04:29.300 to the United

01:04:29.800 States alone

01:04:30.860 is gigantic.

01:04:32.960 It seems like

01:04:33.460 Mexico has

01:04:34.120 everything,

01:04:34.740 or could

01:04:35.380 easily have

01:04:35.980 everything.

01:04:36.800 So it's got

01:04:37.480 to be the

01:04:37.800 corruption

01:04:38.180 that keeps

01:04:39.980 it from being

01:04:40.680 the place

01:04:41.860 for North

01:04:42.380 America to

01:04:42.960 move its

01:04:43.300 businesses.

01:04:45.240 Yeah,

01:04:45.520 it's got to

01:04:45.860 be the

01:04:46.340 narco state,

01:04:46.980 you're right.

01:04:48.380 Remember the

01:04:49.000 other day,

01:04:49.360 the Wagner

01:04:50.640 group head

01:04:51.500 Prigozhin

01:04:52.120 was complaining

01:04:54.000 in public,

01:04:54.800 which was

01:04:55.220 weird,

01:04:56.180 that Moscow

01:04:57.180 was letting

01:04:57.740 him down

01:04:58.260 and the

01:04:58.880 regular military

01:05:00.400 wasn't giving

01:05:01.680 him weapons.

01:05:02.600 And he was

01:05:03.100 going to

01:05:03.340 withdraw and

01:05:04.200 stop fighting

01:05:05.480 because they

01:05:05.880 weren't giving

01:05:06.300 him, not

01:05:06.780 weapons, but

01:05:07.280 enough ammunition.

01:05:08.940 And then

01:05:09.500 the Russian

01:05:10.780 military said,

01:05:12.040 yes, we will

01:05:12.600 give you enough

01:05:13.120 ammunition.

01:05:14.380 And then

01:05:14.760 Prigozhin

01:05:15.360 backed down.

01:05:16.500 And he

01:05:16.840 decided that

01:05:17.420 he would

01:05:17.600 not pull

01:05:18.680 out because

01:05:19.780 they promised

01:05:20.280 to give

01:05:20.580 him ammunition.

01:05:21.980 Now, what

01:05:22.580 do you think

01:05:22.840 happened next?

01:05:25.940 Do you think

01:05:27.100 Prigozhin got

01:05:28.020 a whole bunch

01:05:28.540 of ammunition?

01:05:30.360 Do you think

01:05:31.140 that the

01:05:31.700 Russians who

01:05:32.440 promised him

01:05:33.100 more ammunition

01:05:33.760 loaded it up

01:05:35.140 on trucks and

01:05:35.840 sent it off to

01:05:36.520 them?

01:05:38.260 No, they

01:05:39.280 just lied.

01:05:41.540 That was it.

01:05:43.060 They just

01:05:43.400 said, oh,

01:05:43.820 absolutely.

01:05:45.160 We'll give

01:05:45.660 you ammunition.

01:05:46.700 We'll give

01:05:47.060 you all the

01:05:47.400 ammunition you

01:05:47.980 like.

01:05:48.380 We'll send

01:05:49.120 you more

01:05:49.440 ammunition than

01:05:50.160 you can even

01:05:50.740 shoot.

01:05:52.200 And then

01:05:52.540 they just

01:05:52.940 didn't.

01:05:55.580 So everything

01:05:56.640 that you worry

01:05:57.260 about Russia

01:05:58.020 lying to the

01:05:59.820 United States

01:06:00.460 or to NATO

01:06:01.040 or anybody

01:06:01.520 else, they're

01:06:03.080 lying to each

01:06:03.680 other just as

01:06:04.320 much.

01:06:05.540 So Russia

01:06:06.620 has an

01:06:07.180 enormous lying

01:06:08.600 problem,

01:06:09.420 maybe even

01:06:10.080 worse than

01:06:10.460 ours, in

01:06:11.880 which they

01:06:12.200 can't get

01:06:12.520 anything done

01:06:13.120 internally because

01:06:13.800 they're all

01:06:14.040 just lying to

01:06:14.640 each other.

01:06:15.100 Oh, absolutely.

01:06:15.840 I'll have

01:06:17.120 that done

01:06:17.440 tomorrow.

01:06:18.400 Don't mean

01:06:18.840 any of it.

01:06:20.640 So

01:06:20.860 Pergozian's

01:06:21.600 mad again

01:06:22.440 about not

01:06:23.040 getting his

01:06:23.660 ammo, but

01:06:24.960 he's not at

01:06:25.720 the moment

01:06:26.100 saying he's

01:06:26.620 going to

01:06:26.860 leave, so

01:06:27.380 maybe he's

01:06:27.980 still hoping.

01:06:29.780 I thought

01:06:30.420 this was

01:06:30.760 funny.

01:06:31.700 Russia had

01:06:32.440 its annual

01:06:33.760 victory day,

01:06:34.900 which is a

01:06:35.600 military kind

01:06:37.140 of parade,

01:06:37.960 and they

01:06:38.760 scaled it

01:06:39.240 back.

01:06:39.580 I saw one

01:06:40.020 headline that

01:06:40.480 said they

01:06:40.740 had one

01:06:41.060 tank.

01:06:41.380 I didn't

01:06:43.560 even read

01:06:43.900 the story

01:06:44.340 because when

01:06:44.980 I saw the

01:06:45.380 headline that

01:06:45.840 said they

01:06:46.900 scaled it

01:06:47.340 back to

01:06:47.640 one tank,

01:06:48.640 I didn't

01:06:49.360 want to

01:06:49.640 read it and

01:06:50.040 find out that

01:06:50.540 wasn't true.

01:06:52.000 I'm pretty

01:06:52.580 sure that if

01:06:53.100 I read down

01:06:53.760 there would

01:06:54.520 be lots of

01:06:55.200 other assets

01:06:55.780 there, so

01:06:56.880 maybe the

01:06:57.600 one tank

01:06:58.300 thing, the

01:06:58.760 headline was

01:06:59.340 misleading, but

01:07:00.880 I like the

01:07:02.000 misleading headline

01:07:02.820 so much I

01:07:03.420 didn't want to

01:07:03.940 know that it

01:07:04.780 wasn't true.

01:07:05.680 It's like,

01:07:06.220 yeah, just

01:07:07.060 one tank.

01:07:08.340 Victory

01:07:08.820 day, one

01:07:10.000 tank.

01:07:10.340 Even if

01:07:11.760 it's not

01:07:12.080 true.

01:07:13.020 But to

01:07:13.860 me, the

01:07:14.460 victory day

01:07:15.100 thing, as

01:07:16.040 Pergosian was

01:07:16.880 criticizing it

01:07:17.620 as well, it

01:07:19.700 was a really

01:07:20.340 bad look.

01:07:22.440 If you're

01:07:23.300 Putin and

01:07:25.840 your military

01:07:26.580 says they

01:07:27.100 don't have

01:07:27.400 enough ammo

01:07:28.000 and they're

01:07:28.660 going to

01:07:28.860 lose the

01:07:29.240 war, and

01:07:30.460 you're having

01:07:30.800 a victory

01:07:31.240 day celebration,

01:07:33.020 it's just a

01:07:34.140 bad look.

01:07:35.980 And then

01:07:36.380 making your

01:07:37.380 victory day

01:07:37.880 celebration more

01:07:38.760 pathetic by

01:07:40.200 having fewer

01:07:40.900 military assets

01:07:41.880 in it, makes

01:07:43.320 you look like

01:07:43.820 you're running

01:07:44.160 out of shit.

01:07:45.820 Like, there

01:07:46.180 wasn't anything

01:07:46.920 Putin could

01:07:47.420 do that

01:07:47.780 wasn't going

01:07:48.180 to be a

01:07:48.480 big mistake

01:07:49.200 on victory

01:07:50.140 day, except

01:07:51.400 cancelling it,

01:07:52.540 and he didn't

01:07:53.020 do that.

01:07:54.480 I guess

01:07:54.780 cancelling it

01:07:55.320 would look

01:07:55.640 bad, too.

01:07:57.160 All right.

01:08:00.340 Here's a

01:08:00.880 story I'm

01:08:01.360 trying to keep

01:08:01.860 you up to

01:08:02.560 date on.

01:08:03.060 I was

01:08:04.980 pretty sure

01:08:05.480 this was

01:08:05.920 going to

01:08:06.200 happen, but

01:08:07.000 now it's

01:08:07.380 happening.

01:08:08.320 You've heard

01:08:08.720 of this job

01:08:09.220 called prompt

01:08:09.980 engineer for

01:08:10.980 AI.

01:08:11.900 So you have

01:08:12.680 to ask the

01:08:13.160 question in

01:08:13.680 just the right

01:08:14.160 way, and

01:08:14.740 sometimes you

01:08:15.280 have to put

01:08:16.260 a whole page

01:08:17.700 of prompts to

01:08:19.780 get a good

01:08:20.160 answer.

01:08:20.920 What that

01:08:21.520 means is

01:08:22.020 regular people

01:08:22.920 will only be

01:08:24.100 able to use

01:08:24.700 AI for

01:08:26.360 basically ordinary

01:08:28.220 search stuff,

01:08:29.380 pretty basic

01:08:30.120 stuff.

01:08:30.440 But for

01:08:31.340 anything really

01:08:32.200 useful, such

01:08:34.640 as having it

01:08:35.320 write code for

01:08:36.100 you, that sort

01:08:36.720 of thing, you're

01:08:37.760 going to need

01:08:38.020 somebody who's

01:08:38.580 not only trained

01:08:39.460 to know that

01:08:40.140 the code is

01:08:40.780 right, so you

01:08:42.860 need a programmer,

01:08:44.180 but you also

01:08:45.180 need somebody who

01:08:45.920 knows psychology

01:08:46.780 and AI and is

01:08:48.680 also good with

01:08:49.360 words.

01:08:51.040 So it's this

01:08:51.600 whole new skill

01:08:52.420 to be a prompt

01:08:53.160 engineer.

01:08:54.420 So a prompt

01:08:54.940 engineer is

01:08:55.840 basically a

01:08:56.780 programmer.

01:08:58.420 They are

01:08:58.800 programmers.

01:08:59.680 It's just that

01:09:00.360 instead of

01:09:00.820 calling it a

01:09:01.280 program, they

01:09:02.040 call it a

01:09:02.460 prompt.

01:09:03.420 The prompt

01:09:04.140 being a bunch

01:09:04.980 of English

01:09:05.680 words and

01:09:06.440 English sentences,

01:09:08.280 but it's

01:09:08.980 code.

01:09:10.180 It's the

01:09:10.600 code that you

01:09:11.280 have to know

01:09:11.800 to write on

01:09:13.140 the fly, so

01:09:14.460 the AI will

01:09:15.140 give you a

01:09:15.600 useful answer

01:09:16.300 instead of a

01:09:17.120 surfacy, not

01:09:18.420 useful answer.

01:09:20.820 So if you

01:09:22.480 thought that AI

01:09:23.320 would make

01:09:23.920 programmers

01:09:24.760 obsolete, it

01:09:26.620 looks like it's

01:09:27.340 going to be the

01:09:27.900 opposite.

01:09:28.300 It looks

01:09:30.080 like programmers

01:09:31.320 will just use

01:09:32.160 AI as one

01:09:32.940 of their

01:09:33.160 tools, but

01:09:34.260 the AI isn't

01:09:35.100 going to make

01:09:35.420 programs on

01:09:36.080 its own, and

01:09:37.380 you and I

01:09:37.860 won't know how

01:09:38.320 to tell it to

01:09:38.860 do it.

01:09:39.960 Let me give

01:09:40.540 you the

01:09:40.800 current example.

01:09:41.760 So years

01:09:42.840 ago, I was a

01:09:44.160 programmer, so

01:09:45.380 I've written a

01:09:46.300 lot of

01:09:46.540 programs, and

01:09:48.560 so I

01:09:48.900 understand the

01:09:50.620 basics even

01:09:51.280 though I

01:09:51.580 haven't been

01:09:51.940 involved in a

01:09:53.100 long time.

01:09:54.880 I wouldn't

01:09:55.580 know how to

01:09:55.940 write code

01:09:56.440 with AI, and

01:09:59.700 as a casual

01:10:01.360 user who

01:10:02.320 doesn't work

01:10:02.860 as a

01:10:03.160 programmer at

01:10:03.720 the moment,

01:10:04.600 I would

01:10:05.280 know more

01:10:05.780 than 85%

01:10:07.800 of the

01:10:08.120 normal public

01:10:08.840 about how

01:10:09.920 things work,

01:10:10.880 you know, just

01:10:11.260 because I was

01:10:11.740 once in that

01:10:12.300 world, and I

01:10:14.500 don't know how

01:10:14.780 to do it.

01:10:16.240 Which AI

01:10:16.960 would I use

01:10:17.500 for that?

01:10:18.380 And then if

01:10:18.940 AI wrote me a

01:10:19.780 code, what

01:10:20.220 would I do

01:10:20.620 with it?

01:10:21.900 Where do I

01:10:22.560 put it?

01:10:23.660 How do I

01:10:24.400 compile it?

01:10:25.900 How do I

01:10:26.580 get it into

01:10:27.360 the Apple

01:10:28.080 store?

01:10:29.320 I feel like

01:10:30.320 all these

01:10:30.780 stories we're

01:10:31.400 seeing in

01:10:32.260 the press are

01:10:33.940 all like a

01:10:34.780 demonstration of

01:10:35.780 a new product.

01:10:37.620 Do you ever

01:10:37.940 go to a

01:10:38.360 technology demo

01:10:39.360 in your

01:10:40.840 corporate lives,

01:10:42.420 and somebody

01:10:42.740 will demonstrate

01:10:43.380 the technology,

01:10:44.560 and you'll

01:10:45.340 say, wow,

01:10:46.100 when can I

01:10:46.720 buy that?

01:10:47.160 Well, you

01:10:49.040 know, we

01:10:49.440 don't have

01:10:49.780 one with

01:10:50.180 these features,

01:10:51.480 but you

01:10:51.760 just showed

01:10:52.120 me these

01:10:52.480 features.

01:10:53.200 Well, this

01:10:54.360 is more of

01:10:54.800 a prototype,

01:10:56.340 but it

01:10:56.660 works, right?

01:10:57.540 Well, working

01:10:59.320 is sort of

01:11:01.320 hard to

01:11:01.660 define.

01:11:02.320 It's using

01:11:02.980 a temporary

01:11:03.540 database that

01:11:04.420 in the real

01:11:04.800 world doesn't

01:11:05.380 exist, but

01:11:06.460 it's more to

01:11:06.860 show you what

01:11:07.440 it could do.

01:11:08.780 But it

01:11:09.200 doesn't actually

01:11:09.640 do that.

01:11:10.740 Like, I

01:11:11.240 couldn't do

01:11:11.700 that, right,

01:11:12.400 if I owned

01:11:12.900 that?

01:11:13.160 No, you

01:11:13.560 couldn't do

01:11:13.980 that.

01:11:14.680 It's just a

01:11:15.240 demonstration of

01:11:16.060 what maybe it

01:11:16.620 could do in

01:11:17.060 the future.

01:11:17.600 So I'm

01:11:18.000 feeling like

01:11:18.440 all these

01:11:18.820 AI demonstrations,

01:11:20.460 people will

01:11:21.400 say, look

01:11:21.800 what I

01:11:22.100 did.

01:11:22.900 I had it

01:11:23.420 write this

01:11:23.840 code to

01:11:24.360 do this,

01:11:24.820 and I'll

01:11:24.940 be like, wow,

01:11:26.360 AI wrote

01:11:26.980 you a whole

01:11:27.300 bunch of

01:11:27.640 computer code

01:11:28.380 that works,

01:11:29.220 and did it

01:11:29.640 like in a

01:11:30.080 second.

01:11:30.940 Impressive.

01:11:32.460 But what

01:11:32.860 would I do

01:11:33.320 with that?

01:11:34.840 So now I've

01:11:35.500 got a page

01:11:36.000 of code.

01:11:38.480 What now?

01:11:39.180 Okay, here's

01:11:41.380 the code for

01:11:41.920 my app, and

01:11:43.540 now I cut

01:11:46.340 and paste

01:11:46.660 it, right?

01:11:48.620 So there's

01:11:50.120 this 100

01:11:51.240 miles of

01:11:52.100 technical

01:11:52.640 knowledge that

01:11:54.200 you would have

01:11:54.620 to have to

01:11:55.800 make use of

01:11:56.500 AI's ability

01:11:57.260 to write

01:11:57.640 code.

01:11:58.560 You're not

01:11:59.200 going to get

01:11:59.520 rid of

01:11:59.800 programmers.

01:12:00.740 You're going

01:12:01.060 to need them

01:12:01.600 to use AI

01:12:02.500 to do

01:12:02.960 anything,

01:12:03.720 because regular

01:12:04.680 people won't

01:12:05.240 be able to

01:12:05.560 do anything,

01:12:06.560 at least in

01:12:07.680 terms of writing

01:12:08.240 apps and

01:12:08.740 stuff.

01:12:10.780 AI can

01:12:11.520 teach you

01:12:11.920 all of

01:12:12.220 this?

01:12:12.560 Not yet.

01:12:14.640 Not right.

01:12:16.940 Now, I

01:12:18.380 don't disagree

01:12:19.760 that it

01:12:20.200 might happen,

01:12:21.160 but I

01:12:21.660 can't see

01:12:22.360 AI creating

01:12:23.580 flawless apps

01:12:24.500 that don't

01:12:25.060 require a

01:12:25.580 programmer to

01:12:26.200 debug them,

01:12:27.460 or optimize

01:12:28.600 them.

01:12:29.320 I just don't

01:12:29.820 see it

01:12:30.100 happening.

01:12:33.220 All right.

01:12:33.480 To Serve

01:12:38.300 Man is a

01:12:38.940 cookbook.

01:12:40.160 There's

01:12:40.440 always got

01:12:40.840 to be an

01:12:41.180 NPC in

01:12:41.780 here somewhere.

01:12:45.640 All right.

01:12:46.340 That,

01:12:46.880 ladies and

01:12:47.200 gentlemen,

01:12:48.820 concludes one

01:12:50.240 of the most

01:12:50.580 powerful and

01:12:51.520 informational,

01:12:53.200 perhaps entertaining

01:12:54.060 live streams of

01:12:54.940 your entire

01:12:55.540 lives.

01:12:56.940 Maybe the

01:12:57.400 best thing

01:12:57.780 you've ever

01:12:58.120 seen in your

01:12:58.600 life.

01:12:59.200 Possibly.

01:13:00.360 So, I'm

01:13:01.320 going to say

01:13:01.660 goodbye to the

01:13:02.340 YouTube folks,

01:13:03.440 thanks for

01:13:03.800 joining.

01:13:05.280 Powerful and

01:13:06.140 useful.

01:13:08.600 And I

01:13:10.100 might be doing

01:13:10.560 a man cave

01:13:11.140 tonight for

01:13:12.200 subscribers, if

01:13:13.920 you'd like to

01:13:14.340 get a little

01:13:14.700 extra.

01:13:15.940 By the way,

01:13:16.560 let me just

01:13:18.400 tell the YouTube

01:13:18.900 people a little

01:13:19.560 bit about this.

01:13:20.420 So, I

01:13:22.740 started doing a

01:13:24.240 separate live

01:13:24.840 stream some

01:13:25.560 evenings from

01:13:26.620 my garage

01:13:27.980 slash man

01:13:28.920 cave, in

01:13:30.480 which we

01:13:31.060 enjoy some

01:13:32.240 legal adult

01:13:33.820 entertainment,

01:13:35.540 and chat

01:13:37.340 about anything

01:13:38.040 we feel like

01:13:38.660 it.

01:13:40.140 But here's

01:13:40.580 what's interesting

01:13:41.160 about it.

01:13:42.440 It sort of

01:13:43.040 evolved from

01:13:44.400 a presentation

01:13:45.500 where I

01:13:46.500 try to have

01:13:47.220 something that

01:13:47.740 I plan to

01:13:48.360 say, to

01:13:49.940 just hanging

01:13:50.620 out.

01:13:53.400 Right?

01:13:54.380 I'm looking at

01:13:55.140 the locals

01:13:55.520 people.

01:13:56.200 Wouldn't you

01:13:56.720 say?

01:13:57.260 Because I

01:13:57.780 actually, I

01:13:58.460 turn on the

01:13:59.020 live stream,

01:13:59.860 and I don't

01:14:00.440 go on right

01:14:01.080 away, because

01:14:01.520 I'm preparing,

01:14:02.980 and a few

01:14:04.660 hundred people

01:14:05.240 will stream

01:14:05.760 in, and

01:14:06.420 they start

01:14:06.840 their own

01:14:07.200 party.

01:14:08.700 So, by the

01:14:09.240 time I go

01:14:09.800 live, the

01:14:10.720 party's in

01:14:11.280 full flow, and

01:14:12.600 it has nothing

01:14:13.040 to do with me,

01:14:13.640 and I start

01:14:14.120 talking, and

01:14:15.120 they're just

01:14:15.600 talking among

01:14:16.540 themselves.

01:14:17.880 I can barely

01:14:18.780 get a word

01:14:19.800 edgewise.

01:14:20.820 But it

01:14:21.340 doesn't matter,

01:14:21.940 because people

01:14:24.940 are craving

01:14:27.440 human connection.

01:14:29.940 There's a

01:14:30.540 lack of human

01:14:31.280 connection in

01:14:32.160 society.

01:14:32.840 You're all

01:14:33.380 aware of it,

01:14:33.880 I'm sure, and

01:14:34.900 it's severe.

01:14:36.540 It is severe.

01:14:38.020 And this

01:14:38.880 little bit of

01:14:39.540 digital connection

01:14:41.060 that I enjoy

01:14:42.880 with the other

01:14:43.740 few hundred

01:14:44.180 people, most

01:14:45.780 evenings, I'm

01:14:46.380 doing it more

01:14:46.880 often than not

01:14:47.460 now, is

01:14:48.760 really satisfying.

01:14:50.160 And I have

01:14:51.480 to say, that

01:14:53.020 when I started

01:14:53.640 doing it, you

01:14:55.100 know, it

01:14:56.200 would look like

01:14:56.880 it would be a

01:14:57.240 lot of work if

01:14:57.820 I did it all

01:14:58.320 the time, but

01:14:59.180 now I just

01:14:59.840 look forward to

01:15:00.560 it, much the

01:15:01.420 way I look

01:15:01.820 forward to

01:15:02.240 doing this

01:15:02.680 live stream.

01:15:03.720 So, it

01:15:04.660 turned into

01:15:05.060 this completely

01:15:05.680 symbiotic, it

01:15:08.120 evolved into a

01:15:10.520 few hundred

01:15:10.920 people who

01:15:11.960 essentially have

01:15:13.520 a similar sense

01:15:14.220 of humor.

01:15:15.920 Let me ask

01:15:16.680 this question to

01:15:17.340 the locals

01:15:17.740 people.

01:15:18.460 Wouldn't you

01:15:18.900 say that the

01:15:19.520 single thing

01:15:20.140 that binds

01:15:20.960 the live

01:15:21.620 streamers

01:15:22.560 together for

01:15:23.200 the man

01:15:23.740 cave is the

01:15:24.700 same sense

01:15:25.160 of humor?

01:15:26.620 It's kind of

01:15:27.080 that, right?

01:15:28.060 Yeah, and

01:15:28.860 that's kind of

01:15:29.280 a thin

01:15:29.640 connection, right?

01:15:31.500 But it's

01:15:32.160 important, because

01:15:33.540 if you can

01:15:33.940 laugh with

01:15:34.560 another human

01:15:35.180 being, you

01:15:35.660 feel connected.

01:15:37.120 You know, a

01:15:37.380 good laugh with

01:15:38.100 another person is

01:15:38.840 a very connecting

01:15:39.480 thing.

01:15:40.520 So we get

01:15:41.100 together at

01:15:41.560 night, and

01:15:42.580 you'd have to

01:15:43.100 be a subscriber

01:15:43.720 to see it, and

01:15:45.780 we just hang

01:15:47.460 out.

01:15:47.720 And I

01:15:50.660 think it's

01:15:51.340 really useful.

01:15:53.000 You know, on

01:15:53.420 an actual

01:15:54.400 mental health

01:15:55.320 level, I

01:15:57.600 feel like it's

01:15:58.320 good for all

01:15:58.940 of our mental

01:15:59.460 health.

01:16:00.080 What would

01:16:00.640 you say?

01:16:02.080 Locals?

01:16:03.080 Would you say

01:16:03.560 it's good for

01:16:04.040 your mental

01:16:04.660 health?

01:16:05.400 Because I

01:16:05.920 think it's

01:16:06.580 gone beyond

01:16:07.240 entertainment at

01:16:08.220 this point.

01:16:09.460 You know, I

01:16:09.760 try to be

01:16:10.180 entertaining, but

01:16:11.340 I don't think

01:16:11.700 that's the

01:16:12.080 benefit.

01:16:12.840 I think the

01:16:13.220 benefit is just

01:16:14.000 the connection

01:16:14.800 that people

01:16:15.200 are feeling.

01:16:16.800 So maybe

01:16:17.400 we'll see more

01:16:17.860 of that.

01:16:19.480 All right,

01:16:19.900 good.

01:16:20.240 It's all yeses.

01:16:21.000 It's a big

01:16:21.340 stream of yeses

01:16:22.120 on the locals.

01:16:22.980 All right, I

01:16:23.300 just wanted to

01:16:23.740 share that with

01:16:24.200 you on YouTube,

01:16:25.240 and I will

01:16:25.720 talk to you in

01:16:26.480 the morning.

01:16:28.020 Bye for now.

01:16:28.840 This will also

01:16:29.460 be on Rumble

01:16:30.180 later.

01:16:31.420 Rumble's not

01:16:32.080 live, though.

01:16:32.540 Thank you.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - May 09, 2023

Episode 2103 Scott Adams： Title 42 Ends, eVerify Debate, RFK Jr., HCQ And CIA Killing Kennedy, More

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript