Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2104 Scott Adams： Biden Criminal Enterprise Outed, Trump Proves Justice System Isn't, More

00:00:00.000 Good morning everybody and welcome to the newsiest day of news days ever.

00:00:11.280 Today will be a burner. Oh, it's going to be good.

00:00:15.900 Shudder.

00:00:17.180 And if you'd like your experience at Coffee with Scott Adams to be the best thing you've ever felt in your entire life,

00:00:25.060 physically, mentally, and spiritually,

00:00:27.100 all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or chalice or stein, a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:35.300 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.

00:00:39.140 Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine.

00:00:41.820 The other day, the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:44.240 It's called the simultaneous sip and it happens now.

00:00:47.260 Don't forget the ah at the end. 0.76

00:00:55.420 That's the kind of day it's going to be.

00:00:57.100 Well, how much do I love being right?

00:01:03.760 Anybody? Anybody?

00:01:05.960 Has anybody noticed I have a special delight whenever I'm right about something?

00:01:13.520 Well, today's one of those days.

00:01:15.600 We're going to be talking about all the big stories, yes, Biden, etc.

00:01:19.520 But my favorite story is that the up-till-now quiet Governor Newsom has weighed in on reparations.

00:01:30.040 And, uh, ouch, ouch, patting myself on the back too hard.

00:01:34.600 Ouch, ouch, stop it.

00:01:36.440 Stop, stop it.

00:01:37.960 I can't stop patting myself on the back.

00:01:39.540 And what did Governor Newsom say about the reparations?

00:01:46.920 Well, that's not going to happen.

00:01:48.400 Talk about calling it.

00:01:57.260 Talk about calling your shot before you hit it.

00:01:59.600 I think I called this one pretty far in advance.

00:02:04.000 Yeah.

00:02:04.760 And he's such a weasel, but he's good at it.

00:02:08.500 I guess, you know, I'm kind of complimenting him and insulting him at the same time.

00:02:12.960 So he comes up with this bullshit, uh, explanation that this is my favorite line.

00:02:20.140 Well, you know, reparations is about more than cash payments.

00:02:25.700 Oh, oh, is that what's going on?

00:02:29.460 So the entire conversation that's almost exclusively about cash payments,

00:02:35.680 it's not so much about the cash payments.

00:02:39.320 It's about the ongoing struggle against systemic racism.

00:02:42.260 Which they're doing great.

00:02:44.360 It's about their continuous striving for equity,

00:02:49.240 which is ongoing and doing great.

00:02:52.760 They're going to do more on that.

00:02:54.360 They're going to do more.

00:02:55.840 And so, oh, do we need to talk about the cash payments?

00:03:02.660 When reparations is about so much more, so much more.

00:03:07.480 We don't want to get all caught up in the cash payments part.

00:03:12.260 When it's such a big topic, and we're doing so well on it.

00:03:19.720 So how do you think that's going to go over?

00:03:22.920 Do you think Newsom won over the black community?

00:03:25.700 I think the best way for Trump to play this topic is to say that Newsom was always pranking them.

00:03:39.060 That he was never serious.

00:03:40.880 And he was just yanking them along.

00:03:43.220 And he was lying to black Americans like all Democrats. 0.89

00:03:46.080 Let me say it again.

00:03:48.460 Has anybody mentioned that it's the Democrats that are fucking lying to the black people all the time?

00:03:53.360 And it's only the Republicans, or in my case, I'm a recent Democrat.

00:04:00.280 I joined them when they accused me of being a racist.

00:04:03.740 I said to myself, ah, it's only the Democrats who accused me of being a racist.

00:04:09.380 Republicans don't even see it at all.

00:04:12.120 I think I'll join the Democrats.

00:04:13.400 Because I think they need more racists in their ranks.

00:04:17.960 Kind of tells the story cleanly.

00:04:20.120 So I joined them.

00:04:23.100 But am I wrong that Republicans, and in my own little way, are just a few people telling the truth to black Americans?

00:04:34.200 The truth was, there was never going to be any reparations.

00:04:38.860 I was trying to tell the truth from the start.

00:04:41.460 That there couldn't be any way to do it.

00:04:42.960 It wasn't any practical way to do it.

00:04:45.420 And it didn't make any difference.

00:04:48.640 All right, well, I heard some of the most interesting arguments, which is...

00:04:54.360 Honestly, it angers me to see how abused black Americans have been in this process.

00:05:02.220 It's really ugly.

00:05:04.860 Right?

00:05:05.740 So, separate from, you know, whatever abuses historically have been heaped on black Americans,

00:05:12.160 on top of that, we're just lying to them and treating them like idiots at this point. 0.62

00:05:17.640 The Democrats are.

00:05:18.560 The Democrats are treating them like idiots.

00:05:20.800 And the Republicans are trying to help.

00:05:24.160 But there's just so much you can do.

00:05:26.980 Right?

00:05:27.260 There's a limit to how much you can do.

00:05:30.000 But here's an argument for reparations.

00:05:34.200 Black Americans were denied, you know, various rights.

00:05:39.580 There was redlining.

00:05:40.640 There was slavery.

00:05:42.000 Systemic racism.

00:05:43.160 And so there were many bad things that happened to black people in the past.

00:05:48.480 Therefore, there should be reparations.

00:05:50.260 Did you catch the argument?

00:05:52.920 Let me say the argument again.

00:05:55.880 Because this is the argument that was presented to me.

00:05:58.400 There are a various number of bad things that the country did to black Americans throughout history.

00:06:05.340 And we all agree on those.

00:06:08.680 Factually, I think we're all on the same page.

00:06:10.480 From redlining to slavery to systemic racism.

00:06:13.920 All true.

00:06:14.960 All true.

00:06:16.760 And then here's the argument.

00:06:19.080 So there should be reparations.

00:06:22.340 Where's the argument?

00:06:24.100 All these bad things happened.

00:06:26.420 And they were somewhat sanctioned by government or at least not stopped.

00:06:29.500 So therefore, there should be reparations.

00:06:34.680 Do you catch the argument?

00:06:36.280 There is none.

00:06:38.060 I substituted the word should where you expected an argument.

00:06:44.480 Should is not an argument.

00:06:46.480 That's not an argument.

00:06:48.320 It's not a legal standard.

00:06:51.080 It's not logic.

00:06:52.220 It doesn't follow from the facts.

00:06:55.940 It's just a word that you inserted so that people don't understand that there wasn't any reason there.

00:07:03.140 Do you understand that bad things have happened to people all through history, right?

00:07:08.220 Like lots and lots of bad things.

00:07:11.000 We're not talking about giving them reparations.

00:07:14.140 Do you know why?

00:07:16.100 Because there's no argument for it.

00:07:18.240 There's no argument for it.

00:07:19.700 The fact that the country did bad things to people in the past is more like a set of facts.

00:07:27.600 A set of facts is not an argument.

00:07:29.880 You have to connect the dots.

00:07:31.780 So here's what an argument would look like.

00:07:34.160 So this is not the argument, but it's what it would look like.

00:07:37.860 Bad things happened.

00:07:41.120 Let's say we have a standard in this country that we like, because it defines who we are,

00:07:48.160 in which we try to compensate for bad things that happened.

00:07:53.620 And this is so much like other bad things that have happened.

00:07:57.260 The precedent is set.

00:07:58.840 And we think that if we correct it, society will function better.

00:08:04.760 In other words, we'll all get along better.

00:08:06.240 And our national disgrace, you know, the, what do they call it, the original sin of slavery,

00:08:14.300 will be not taken away, but at least you can do a little bit about it.

00:08:18.560 Now, that would be close to an argument, right?

00:08:22.900 I'm not saying you would agree with it or disagree with it, but that's what an argument would look like.

00:08:27.360 You'd say what you want, and then you would connect what you want with how that makes the system stronger,

00:08:34.120 or it writes an injustice or something.

00:08:36.900 But the word should doesn't do any of those things.

00:08:41.640 Bad things happen, therefore you should give me money.

00:08:45.280 That's not an argument.

00:08:46.820 But that is the argument that we're given.

00:08:49.620 And so here's my counter-argument to that.

00:08:53.060 You don't think women were abused also for 100,000 years?

00:08:59.780 I mean, women only got the right to vote. 1.00

00:09:01.580 But to vote, and how long ago was it that women got the right to vote? 1.00

00:09:07.700 It wasn't that long ago.

00:09:11.220 Could women even own anything? 1.00

00:09:14.280 Didn't we have a lot of history where women couldn't even, literally couldn't even own anything? 1.00

00:09:20.340 So let me give you an example from my own lifetime, right?

00:09:25.460 So my grandfather owned a farm, and when he died, he left the farm to his oldest son, and that was it.

00:09:41.340 He had two daughters, nothing, you know, except odds and ends.

00:09:46.760 But one of them got his entire farm, which was worth a fortune, because he was the oldest son.

00:09:52.220 He didn't leave it to his wife.

00:09:56.940 Did you hear that?

00:09:58.480 He didn't leave his fortune, his farm, to his wife.

00:10:03.900 He left it to his oldest son, because that's just the way it was done.

00:10:07.720 Now, you don't think women have an argument for reparations? 1.00

00:10:12.440 It would be an easy argument.

00:10:13.820 If the argument is, bad things happen, therefore you should, with the word should, you know, standing in for an actual argument, give me money.

00:10:25.300 Is there anybody else who could make that argument?

00:10:28.100 How about the white Northerners who fought in the Civil War to end slavery, among other things?

00:10:33.940 Do you think the white Northerners who never had any slaves didn't get any money from it, and then lost their lives, are they better off or worse off than the descendants of slaves?

00:10:45.960 Let's see, one is dead, fighting for the freedom of other people.

00:10:51.680 And one lived, but had a, you know, real bad situation, but now their children are in a better situation.

00:10:58.280 Not ideal, but better.

00:10:59.540 And, so here's the problem with should.

00:11:05.760 You can put the word should between any two set of facts and act like you made an argument.

00:11:11.700 But the world is full of people who have been abused by the government.

00:11:15.800 The government has been abusing people forever.

00:11:19.060 What about the draft?

00:11:21.100 If you got drafted for the Vietnam War, which was bullshit, do you have reason for reparations?

00:11:28.700 I would say so.

00:11:30.540 I would say so.

00:11:31.800 If you want to use should.

00:11:33.760 Yeah.

00:11:34.200 People were drafted into the military and then were killed or wounded, so therefore they should get reparations.

00:11:42.700 Right?

00:11:43.320 You can't make a should argument.

00:11:45.520 If should is requirement, you don't have any argument.

00:11:49.240 All right.

00:11:49.720 Well, I know you want to talk about the Biden crime family.

00:11:53.360 So, I guess that the press conference is probably still going live.

00:11:58.240 Some of you are watching that.

00:12:00.080 And here's what I was expecting.

00:12:04.320 I was expecting that Comer and the Republicans did not have the goods.

00:12:09.680 What were you expecting?

00:12:10.620 I was expecting it would be a weak case that maybe sounded good at first, but as soon as you got under the hood, you'd find out it was vaporware and there was nothing there.

00:12:22.340 It was kind of like the, you know, the walls are closing in on Trump kind of thing.

00:12:26.480 Oh, the walls are closing in on Hunter, finally.

00:12:29.220 So, I thought there would be nothing there.

00:12:31.260 Now, I'll give you my first impression, which is subject to change, because what's definitely going to happen is that the Democrats are going to mount a defense.

00:12:43.280 Right?

00:12:43.740 So, there'll be a, like the news will, the news will form ranks around Biden and they'll create this cushion of information and misinformation, of course, which will try to protect him.

00:12:56.960 So, we haven't seen the protective field form yet.

00:13:00.200 But, we've seen one indication of it, which reminds me of Tucker Carlson.

00:13:07.180 I just saw, what case was it for?

00:13:11.000 I think it might have been related to this, that one of the Biden people said that Republicans must be working for China.

00:13:20.480 Yeah, they're working for the benefit of China.

00:13:23.100 And I thought to myself, there it is.

00:13:25.020 There's your confession.

00:13:25.840 As Tucker has pointed out, the Democrats always accuse you of specifically what they're guilty of.

00:13:33.420 Not even generally, but specifically what they're guilty of, which is taking money from China.

00:13:39.460 And apparently, that's one of the accusations that got surfaced today by Comer and his Republican buddies.

00:13:46.200 So, now we've got that Tucker confirmation, which is not a legal standard, but it's so predictable that you can't not see it anymore.

00:14:00.000 As soon as they come up with a wild accusation like, you're colluding with Russia, they were colluding with Russia.

00:14:08.480 The people, yeah, they accused Trump of colluding with Russia while they colluded with Russia to come up with the fake charges that he was colluding with Russia.

00:14:18.640 So, it's very consistent, yeah.

00:14:25.480 All right.

00:14:28.860 I just saw a real dumbass NPC comment that was sort of a classic.

00:14:35.740 So, here's what we know, according to Comer and his buddies.

00:14:39.440 There were, let's see, the accusations were just coming out when I signed on.

00:14:45.420 There were 16 to 20 companies, entities that the Bidens were shuffling money through.

00:14:53.620 And the experts are saying that given the velocity of money that went through these companies and the complexity of the setup of who's paying who and where's it going.

00:15:04.060 And money went to nine different Biden members.

00:15:07.540 And here's the kill shot.

00:15:09.440 I didn't think the Republicans would have a kill shot.

00:15:12.540 I thought they would have a bunch of accusations that would be sort of cloudy and, you know, there'd be a defense.

00:15:19.140 But here's the kill shot.

00:15:21.560 The way the business was set up, the complexity of it, there is no legitimate business that would ever be set up that way.

00:15:29.980 It is set up exactly for corruption.

00:15:35.000 But here's the real kill shot at the bottom of that.

00:15:37.980 There's no business model.

00:15:40.240 There's no business model.

00:15:43.800 In other words, there's no invoice.

00:15:47.120 There's no services presented.

00:15:50.500 There's no product sold.

00:15:53.000 It's just a bunch of old companies where money is going around.

00:15:56.340 It's very obviously a corrupt scheme.

00:15:59.140 Now, whether or not that could ever be proven is independent from the fact that we're going to think it's corruption.

00:16:11.900 I mean, it's so obvious at this point that it was set up for only that purpose, for corruption, to hide the payments.

00:16:22.740 And, you know, I guess Trump is also being blamed for whatever overseas.

00:16:28.160 But as Comer pointed out, Trump had real businesses, right?

00:16:33.640 Jared Kushner has real businesses.

00:16:35.380 So the Saudis, I think, were investors in one of his funds that he started after he left.

00:16:42.160 That's a real business.

00:16:43.780 You put money into a fund.

00:16:46.200 You hope the fund invests and makes you some more money than you put in.

00:16:49.700 And then it gives you some of the money.

00:16:52.240 Now, you definitely have to wonder about any political business involvement.

00:16:57.780 But at least that's a real business and it's fairly transparent.

00:17:01.800 The fact that we know that Saudi put money in there is all I wanted to know.

00:17:06.920 Yeah.

00:17:07.200 Tell me that you know it.

00:17:09.240 Be transparent.

00:17:10.620 I could live with that.

00:17:13.280 And, you know, Jared has an actual track record that suggests he can turn your money into more money.

00:17:19.680 So if I had a chance to invest in his companies, I probably would.

00:17:24.140 Probably would.

00:17:24.940 All right.

00:17:27.220 So here's what else we know about the...

00:17:30.400 Apparently, our government already was flagging 170 suspicious financial activities related to Hunter Biden and these Biden shell companies.

00:17:43.320 FBI has been knowing that it looks sketchy for a while.

00:17:49.040 And Comer says there are two whistleblowers that will come forward.

00:17:52.620 So now they've got whistleblowers, they've got bank records, and they've got experts who know how corruption works who say, oh, yeah, this is classic.

00:18:05.800 And here's the key point.

00:18:09.560 A substantial amount of it happened while Biden was vice president.

00:18:14.240 And they seem to be able to connect some activities around the money flowing and some policies that directly or indirectly were good for the company that paid the money.

00:18:27.060 And it looks like the Biden business model is that they get 30 percent, or the Hunter does, that he gives to his family members, 30 percent of whatever deals they were working out there.

00:18:40.900 So, and a significant part of the money was coming from Chinese controlled companies.

00:18:51.000 So one of the things that Biden had specifically denied is that money was coming from Chinese companies.

00:18:57.120 But now they have the documentation that it was.

00:19:03.140 So, let's see.

00:19:05.440 So he lied about money from Chinese companies.

00:19:08.420 This is Joe Biden.

00:19:09.840 He lied about, well, he lied about knowing, we assume.

00:19:17.420 Because the scope of the operation was so substantial, there isn't really any realistic way that Joe Biden didn't know.

00:19:27.120 Because he was the one providing the service.

00:19:29.860 He was the one meeting the Romanians or having dinner with a business partner or whatever.

00:19:35.020 There isn't any legitimate way he didn't know.

00:19:37.760 Would you agree?

00:19:39.540 Would anybody disagree with that statement?

00:19:42.020 We can say with clarity at this point he knew.

00:19:46.500 Yeah, we can say that for sure.

00:19:49.660 I think you could also say for sure it was an influence selling operation.

00:19:57.120 Do you think there's any doubt about that at this point?

00:20:01.060 Do you have any doubt that it was an influence selling operation?

00:20:06.020 And that it apparently involved China, Romania, Serbia, lots of different companies, nine different family members?

00:20:16.120 This is clearly a crime organization.

00:20:20.000 The Biden crime family is actually a literal thing.

00:20:24.120 It's a real thing.

00:20:25.980 There is a Biden crime family.

00:20:27.800 And it's been operating for many years.

00:20:31.340 And now we know.

00:20:32.160 Now, I'm going to say the Republicans are doing a good job on this.

00:20:37.060 Am I wrong?

00:20:38.580 I don't say that a lot.

00:20:40.580 I mean, even when I'm, you know, leaning pro-Republican on some specific policy or something,

00:20:46.580 I don't usually say the Republicans are doing a great job.

00:20:50.360 That's not something that comes out of my lips too often.

00:20:52.620 But on this, I'm actually surprised.

00:20:57.080 I'm kind of surprised.

00:20:58.200 It looks like they actually deliver the goods.

00:21:00.600 Now, that doesn't mean something will happen.

00:21:02.980 I still think we live in a country that is sufficiently corrupt that everybody can know the Biden family is a criminal enterprise.

00:21:12.420 And nothing will happen.

00:21:13.580 So I do not predict that there will be consequences.

00:21:19.060 I don't.

00:21:20.240 I do predict that it's now obvious that it was a crime family situation.

00:21:26.460 I would say that's obvious now.

00:21:28.800 I don't think there will be consequences.

00:21:31.480 I just don't think we live in a world where things operate that way.

00:21:36.180 You know, all indications are that something sketchy will happen and they'll all escape for one reason or another.

00:21:44.620 It could be Biden pardons everybody and then resigns.

00:21:49.580 Right?

00:21:50.740 Could he do that?

00:21:52.340 Could Biden just pardon his whole family and then resign?

00:21:56.620 Worst case scenario.

00:21:58.160 I mean, he wouldn't want to do that.

00:21:59.720 But he has the option.

00:22:01.580 So you can forget about any of them going to jail.

00:22:06.180 The only way Hunter could go to jail that I can imagine is if Joe Biden died suddenly.

00:22:14.600 And he couldn't.

00:22:15.400 Well, even Kamala would probably give the pardon then. 1.00

00:22:18.380 Yeah, there's probably no way.

00:22:19.800 There's probably no way that any of them will ever be in trouble.

00:22:24.360 So we'll watch out for that.

00:22:26.620 But I cannot wait until Trump gets his teeth into this.

00:22:32.180 However Trump decides to spin this thing is going to be art.

00:22:41.040 Because usually Trump doesn't have that much to work with, right?

00:22:44.120 He's working with rumors and innuendos and hyperbole.

00:22:49.700 Maybe he's exaggerating DeSantis' record a little bit, that sort of thing.

00:22:53.700 So he usually has pretty thin things to work with.

00:22:58.200 You know, even Crooked Hillary was more like rumors than facts. 0.98

00:23:04.180 But now the Biden stuff is going to be pretty well documented.

00:23:08.800 What does Trump do with that?

00:23:11.080 That's like you put the biggest steak in the world on his plate and said,

00:23:15.620 are you hungry?

00:23:16.760 Wow.

00:23:17.720 Yeah, I think he's going to devour this.

00:23:19.360 I also think that the odds of RFK Jr. being the next president just went way up.

00:23:29.040 It went way up.

00:23:31.380 You don't think there's some Democrats who are pretty sick of this shit?

00:23:36.380 Oh, yeah.

00:23:37.800 Yeah.

00:23:38.300 Just as there are many Republicans who are sick of defending Trump,

00:23:43.780 like even if you liked his policies, aren't you sick of defending him?

00:23:48.180 I am.

00:23:48.640 I'm tired of it.

00:23:50.760 It didn't help me.

00:23:51.840 It didn't help my life.

00:23:53.040 Probably is the reason I got canceled more than anything else.

00:23:56.340 Right?

00:23:56.800 So there's nothing good in it, defending any of the people,

00:24:00.500 even if you like their policies.

00:24:02.120 I've got a feeling that the Democrats are going to feel a little bit of

00:24:05.040 that defending your guy fatigue that Trump supporters feel.

00:24:10.220 It's like, I've been doing this too long.

00:24:12.060 I've got to stop defending the same person all the time.

00:24:17.480 Although, you could call it not defending, but you know what I mean.

00:24:22.800 All right.

00:24:24.260 Then I did see that it looks like a number of people are going to enter the race, 0.98

00:24:29.040 possibly to primary.

00:24:31.000 It's going to get interesting.

00:24:36.460 It's going to get interesting.

00:24:37.960 So I've got a feeling that RFK Jr. is the thing that got out of the,

00:24:44.180 the toothpaste that got out of the tube.

00:24:45.860 I don't think they can put him back in now.

00:24:48.960 He might have positioned himself at exactly the right place at exactly the

00:24:53.140 right time that the Democrats are going to say, oh,

00:24:56.080 we better act fast to get somebody who has some chance of winning,

00:25:01.320 some chance of winning.

00:25:02.660 Tell me who they could replace RFK Jr. with.

00:25:06.020 Name me, name me any Democrat who could be RFK Jr.

00:25:10.860 If Biden, if Biden isn't in it, name anybody who could beat him.

00:25:15.860 You think Newsom could beat RFK Jr.

00:25:20.000 After the reparations thing?

00:25:23.560 Maybe until the reparations thing happened.

00:25:26.260 And now I think he's dead meat.

00:25:29.760 Yeah, I will, I will give you, I will grant you this, this truth.

00:25:36.240 Newsom is skilled.

00:25:37.640 Would everybody agree with that?

00:25:39.900 Newsom isn't a regular politician.

00:25:42.340 He's a little extra.

00:25:43.240 Yeah, he's got the politician gene where he can just do the politician stuff

00:25:49.480 really well.

00:25:51.720 Now, I don't think he's been a good operator for the state.

00:25:55.680 I don't think he's made good decisions for the state.

00:25:58.040 But boy, you put a camera on him,

00:26:00.040 and he goes into his, you know, Newsom mode.

00:26:05.260 That's pretty good.

00:26:06.820 He just looks like a leader.

00:26:08.360 He's got that leader vibe,

00:26:10.400 even if he's not effective.

00:26:11.580 So, yeah, Newsom could put a dent in the RFK Jr. machine.

00:26:18.960 But I think RFK Jr. has more gears and less baggage, weirdly.

00:26:26.500 I mean, he has baggage, but it's baggage that he can turn into a positive.

00:26:30.940 He hasn't quite done it, but he's very close to it.

00:26:33.540 Yeah, the biggest hit on RFK Jr.

00:26:37.980 Think about the biggest hits on him.

00:26:39.660 Number one big hit, he used to be a wild, drug-taking philanderer.

00:26:45.860 Is that going to hurt him?

00:26:47.820 He had a wild, drug-taking, philandering life,

00:26:50.700 which he fully admits to,

00:26:52.400 and he's off drugs now.

00:26:53.920 I don't think that hurts him.

00:26:56.660 Sorry.

00:26:57.580 It just makes him relatable.

00:26:59.480 It makes him more of a Kennedy. 0.70

00:27:02.660 You would think that maybe he wasn't genetically related

00:27:06.140 unless he was also a philanderer.

00:27:08.900 Right?

00:27:09.140 That's so baked into your Kennedy understanding

00:27:12.300 that if he didn't do a little philandering,

00:27:14.720 you'd wonder if, you know,

00:27:15.940 maybe he was not genetically related or something.

00:27:19.800 So I don't think that hurts him at all,

00:27:22.080 and especially if he runs against Trump,

00:27:24.680 nobody's going to think,

00:27:25.700 oh, we don't want the philanderer. 1.00

00:27:28.560 I mean, that's not going to be an issue.

00:27:31.080 And the other thing RFK Jr. has against him

00:27:36.740 is that the pro-vaccination people think he's a nut.

00:27:42.420 And you think to yourself,

00:27:43.800 well, there's no way you can right that ship.

00:27:46.360 Right?

00:27:46.460 There's no way you can go from being the,

00:27:50.100 what seems like anti-science against kids vaccinations,

00:27:53.340 anyway, to pro-science.

00:27:56.240 That's just too big of a thing.

00:27:57.980 But you're wrong,

00:27:59.900 because I've watched him do it.

00:28:02.000 I watched him actually move that battleship.

00:28:06.540 He actually turned a battleship in real time

00:28:09.120 while I watched.

00:28:10.520 Here's how he did it.

00:28:11.660 I never said there's a definite link

00:28:13.700 between these vaccinations and autism.

00:28:16.460 I said the correlation is super high

00:28:18.540 and that the way they're tested is insufficient

00:28:21.480 because they didn't do randomized controlled trials.

00:28:25.360 They did abbreviated trials

00:28:27.400 because they had legal cover to do it.

00:28:30.440 They just didn't have to do the work,

00:28:32.080 so they didn't.

00:28:32.700 So I think that they should have to do the work.

00:28:36.840 Now, what part of that do you disagree with?

00:28:41.200 Think about it.

00:28:42.700 You know, I'd never really paid much attention to him before

00:28:45.620 when he was talking about childhood vaccinations

00:28:48.500 because I thought he was a nut, honestly.

00:28:51.760 I just dismissed it

00:28:52.740 because the news told me he was a nut

00:28:54.240 and that he was being anti-science.

00:28:57.140 So at the time,

00:28:58.060 this is my simple, stupid, earlier me. 0.63

00:29:01.960 Right now I'm a little wiser.

00:29:03.860 Now I know that it's all made up.

00:29:06.660 Now I know that pretty much all of our medical data

00:29:09.820 is just made up.

00:29:10.640 It's just bullshit.

00:29:11.840 But I didn't know it at the time

00:29:13.220 or I didn't know the extent of it at the time.

00:29:15.720 I knew some was.

00:29:16.400 But now that you know it's all corrupt,

00:29:19.620 when you hear the guy who knew it from the start,

00:29:23.080 he knew it was all corrupt from the start.

00:29:28.260 So he, for me,

00:29:30.180 he turned the battleship around

00:29:32.040 like it was a figure skater.

00:29:35.280 I mean, I saw this immovable,

00:29:37.580 impossible-to-change thing.

00:29:39.600 I'm anti-science because I was anti-vax.

00:29:42.740 How in the world do you change that battleship

00:29:45.180 when it's already moving in one direction?

00:29:48.380 And then he said,

00:29:49.600 they're not tested sufficiently.

00:29:54.700 And I'm not saying that I proved a connection.

00:29:58.100 I'm saying it's really, really high.

00:29:59.960 And if you're not looking at the correlation,

00:30:02.220 you're not doing your work.

00:30:03.540 You're not protecting children.

00:30:05.580 And suddenly,

00:30:07.120 I'm completely on board.

00:30:09.500 How do you do that?

00:30:11.680 I mean, think about that.

00:30:12.500 Think about the persuasion difficulty

00:30:16.300 of flipping the anti-science guy

00:30:20.460 to the only logical person in the conversation.

00:30:24.700 He sounds like the only person

00:30:26.300 who knows what he's talking about.

00:30:28.100 It's fucking awesome.

00:30:30.000 Now, I don't think he's smarter than Vivek.

00:30:33.600 Vivek is super smart

00:30:35.160 and super good at all this.

00:30:37.060 But I am so happy

00:30:38.760 that we've got both of them in the race.

00:30:43.780 Win or lose,

00:30:45.180 Vivek Ramaswamy

00:30:46.800 and RFK Jr.

00:30:49.020 are two of the best things

00:30:50.280 that have ever happened in politics,

00:30:51.940 in my opinion,

00:30:53.300 because they're actually telling the truth

00:30:55.360 and they seem to have a track record

00:30:58.420 of telling the truth at any cost.

00:31:01.740 Am I right?

00:31:03.380 They both have a track record

00:31:05.200 of telling you the truth

00:31:06.500 as they see it.

00:31:07.700 I'm not saying they could be right

00:31:09.000 about everything.

00:31:09.960 But they have a track record

00:31:11.040 of telling the truth

00:31:11.820 as they see it

00:31:12.800 at any cost.

00:31:15.620 When have you seen that before?

00:31:17.500 Have you ever seen two candidates

00:31:19.060 at the same time,

00:31:21.340 different sides,

00:31:22.500 where both of them

00:31:23.700 have a focus on the truth

00:31:25.660 and you could actually believe that

00:31:27.700 because they have enough

00:31:29.260 of a track record

00:31:30.180 and they're modeling

00:31:32.920 their own behavior

00:31:33.820 as they go successfully.

00:31:36.280 It's a hell of a thing.

00:31:37.940 And it makes both Biden and Trump

00:31:39.860 look like dinosaurs,

00:31:40.960 doesn't it?

00:31:41.980 If I'm being honest.

00:31:43.400 It makes them both look like dinosaurs.

00:31:45.280 Because Biden and Trump

00:31:46.300 are both from the era of

00:31:47.660 you just say anything.

00:31:50.880 Just say anything.

00:31:52.940 It doesn't have to be true.

00:31:54.180 If they believe it,

00:31:56.900 you say it.

00:31:57.580 And it appears that

00:31:59.220 Ramaswamy and RFK Jr.

00:32:01.740 are not of that school.

00:32:04.640 And what is it that we need more of

00:32:07.680 in America than anything else?

00:32:11.760 The truth.

00:32:13.900 The truth.

00:32:15.520 America only has one problem.

00:32:18.720 You can quote me on that.

00:32:21.300 America only has one problem.

00:32:24.740 The truth.

00:32:25.780 Because everything else,

00:32:29.080 we have all of the muscle to handle.

00:32:31.700 Don't we?

00:32:32.920 Give us a war, 0.98

00:32:34.500 we can handle that.

00:32:35.860 Give us a disaster,

00:32:37.820 we'll handle that.

00:32:39.040 Give us some internal conflict,

00:32:40.980 we got this.

00:32:43.000 Aliens land,

00:32:43.900 we could probably figure it out.

00:32:45.760 Climate change,

00:32:46.640 yeah, we'll get there.

00:32:47.420 We'll figure it out.

00:32:49.180 But we can't handle

00:32:50.520 not having the truth.

00:32:52.180 Because then your solutions

00:32:53.560 are just randomized.

00:32:54.800 There's no way that works.

00:32:57.280 So we have two candidates,

00:32:58.880 one on each side,

00:32:59.740 who are promising us the truth.

00:33:01.960 Different policies, probably.

00:33:03.840 But promising us the truth

00:33:05.220 in a way that's actually credible.

00:33:07.640 It's actually credible

00:33:09.300 that they could offer us the truth.

00:33:11.880 I've never thought that was a possibility before.

00:33:14.340 Have you?

00:33:14.720 Have you ever imagined that the truth

00:33:17.160 was actually on the table?

00:33:18.960 I've never even considered it.

00:33:22.140 Like, it never seemed like a possibility.

00:33:24.900 But it's on the table now.

00:33:27.120 And if you don't think

00:33:27.780 that's one of the best things

00:33:28.920 that's ever happened

00:33:29.760 in the history of American politics,

00:33:32.140 I say it is.

00:33:35.420 I say it's one of the most important things

00:33:37.400 in the history of American politics.

00:33:40.420 We have people on both sides

00:33:41.720 arguing for the truth

00:33:42.840 and meaning it

00:33:43.900 for the first time.

00:33:46.500 Now, I love me some Trump.

00:33:48.700 Don't get me wrong.

00:33:50.680 I love Trump personally,

00:33:52.640 like as a person.

00:33:53.800 He's really fun.

00:33:54.580 Yeah, if you ever get a chance

00:33:57.460 to just like talk to him

00:33:58.520 for 10 minutes,

00:33:59.520 you're going to walk away

00:34:00.540 with a positive feeling.

00:34:02.240 He just has a really good...

00:34:05.260 In fact, all the Trumps that I met

00:34:07.600 have that same thing going on.

00:34:10.300 Their personal charisma

00:34:11.740 is just off the chart.

00:34:13.440 It's crazy.

00:34:15.780 And I like a lot of Trump's policies,

00:34:17.540 but like most of you,

00:34:18.600 I don't like being swept up

00:34:20.900 into the bullshit

00:34:21.640 and the, you know,

00:34:23.900 all the damage

00:34:25.860 that anybody gets into

00:34:26.920 if they're anywhere

00:34:27.420 near the blast zone.

00:34:29.360 So I'd rather not be

00:34:30.460 in the blast zone.

00:34:31.760 And I think that it's time

00:34:33.420 that we look at our older politicians

00:34:35.460 in a different light

00:34:36.480 as long as we have alternatives,

00:34:38.540 which it seems we do.

00:34:41.620 So I'm still going to be

00:34:43.120 a single issue voter on fentanyl.

00:34:45.820 And we'll see how that

00:34:46.820 shapes up as we go

00:34:48.320 because the candidates

00:34:49.420 are going to be modifying

00:34:50.260 their opinions

00:34:51.480 a little bit clarifying.

00:34:53.180 So we'll see how that goes.

00:34:54.820 But I'm going to say good things

00:34:56.260 about all three

00:34:57.340 of those candidates at least

00:34:59.080 and maybe others.

00:35:00.520 Maybe others.

00:35:01.520 I think there's a lot positive

00:35:03.340 to say about Ramaswamy,

00:35:07.160 RFK Jr.,

00:35:08.860 and maybe some others.

00:35:10.220 There might be some others

00:35:10.980 who get in,

00:35:11.500 then I've got some good things

00:35:12.680 to talk about.

00:35:14.620 All right.

00:35:14.900 So I think the Bidens are done.

00:35:23.780 Is it too soon?

00:35:26.440 I think they're done politically.

00:35:28.140 I don't think they're done legally.

00:35:30.880 Like I said,

00:35:31.400 I don't think the legal system

00:35:32.620 has even the ability

00:35:35.180 to take them down.

00:35:35.960 The Blast Zone, yeah.

00:35:44.060 Yeah.

00:35:44.780 I believe that the Bidens 0.58

00:35:46.780 are politically finished.

00:35:49.740 I don't think Joe Biden

00:35:51.100 can win re-election

00:35:52.240 based on the Biden crime family narrative.

00:35:57.080 Because I don't see

00:35:57.940 what they can do about that.

00:36:00.260 To me, that's...

00:36:01.980 They're done.

00:36:04.240 I'm not seeing a lot of agreement

00:36:05.700 or disagreement.

00:36:06.520 I think you're all undecided

00:36:07.780 at this point.

00:36:09.020 Can you give me a sense

00:36:10.700 of whether you're

00:36:11.460 on the same page?

00:36:13.460 So here's my statement.

00:36:14.940 Say agree or don't agree.

00:36:17.340 My statement is

00:36:18.280 that Biden is done politically.

00:36:20.380 He can't win.

00:36:22.340 Agree or disagree.

00:36:26.520 All right.

00:36:27.380 I've seen a lot of agreement,

00:36:28.940 some disagreements.

00:36:30.620 Looks like the agreements

00:36:31.740 and the number of the disagreements

00:36:33.860 by two to one, maybe.

00:36:38.720 But that's also because

00:36:40.280 this audience is somewhat biased.

00:36:44.260 Two to one's not telling me much

00:36:46.060 because that's probably

00:36:47.240 what it was before this.

00:36:51.440 Thought the same

00:36:52.340 when he was campaigning

00:36:53.160 from the basement.

00:36:54.420 Now, I don't think you can compare

00:36:56.680 the campaigning from the basement,

00:36:59.080 which just looked like

00:37:00.060 a real weak idea,

00:37:01.740 but it kept him out of trouble.

00:37:05.480 Now he's in trouble, right?

00:37:08.200 So comparing the thing

00:37:10.300 that literally kept him

00:37:11.560 out of trouble,

00:37:12.620 because he didn't say much,

00:37:14.540 with the thing where he's already

00:37:16.200 in the deepest trouble

00:37:17.160 I can even imagine,

00:37:18.740 that's as different

00:37:19.900 as you could be.

00:37:20.960 One's out of trouble

00:37:21.840 and one's in trouble.

00:37:22.720 They're opposites.

00:37:24.100 You said this exact thing

00:37:27.420 in October 2020.

00:37:29.860 Remind me.

00:37:31.880 Exact thing about

00:37:33.140 the Biden crime family?

00:37:37.260 Because I don't recall

00:37:38.700 that we had...

00:37:41.980 I don't recall saying that.

00:37:45.440 But I might have.

00:37:47.120 Anyway,

00:37:47.560 if somebody knows

00:37:48.860 I said something

00:37:49.640 that's incompatible

00:37:50.980 with what I just said,

00:37:53.200 if you could produce that,

00:37:54.720 I'll take a look at it.

00:37:56.960 Well,

00:37:57.500 so here's the thing.

00:37:58.780 We did know,

00:37:59.960 we did know in 2020

00:38:01.520 that Hunter was doing

00:38:04.720 sketchy things.

00:38:06.180 But would you agree

00:38:07.180 that in 2020

00:38:07.940 we didn't have documentation?

00:38:09.720 So it was still

00:38:12.160 a jump ball

00:38:13.000 in terms of politics.

00:38:15.320 You and I

00:38:16.000 may have decided

00:38:16.720 that we knew

00:38:17.380 for two years.

00:38:18.820 I'll give you that.

00:38:20.340 Yeah,

00:38:20.580 we knew.

00:38:22.120 But I don't think

00:38:22.860 the voting public,

00:38:24.240 the people who are not

00:38:25.080 following all these

00:38:26.120 arcane details

00:38:27.780 of politics,

00:38:28.600 I don't think

00:38:29.100 the voting public knew.

00:38:30.900 But I think

00:38:31.440 now they will.

00:38:33.060 I think there's no way

00:38:34.080 the Democrats

00:38:34.740 don't fully understand

00:38:36.260 what's at risk here.

00:38:37.780 And I'm pretty sure

00:38:40.160 before they were just saying,

00:38:41.260 ah,

00:38:41.500 that's just Trump people

00:38:43.240 making up stories.

00:38:45.840 So this does feel

00:38:47.080 like a whole level

00:38:48.160 different to me.

00:38:48.960 All right,

00:38:49.340 let's move on.

00:38:51.300 So Trump was found liable.

00:38:53.460 It is E. Jean Carroll

00:38:54.580 lawsuit situation

00:38:56.160 to the two to five

00:38:58.020 or six million dollars.

00:38:59.640 My understanding is

00:39:00.900 that a judge

00:39:01.600 could and somewhat

00:39:03.420 typically does

00:39:04.520 lower that amount

00:39:05.680 still if it held

00:39:07.400 it would be expensive

00:39:08.600 and it would show

00:39:09.340 you did bad things.

00:39:11.180 However,

00:39:11.960 as smart people

00:39:13.060 have been pointing out,

00:39:15.720 there's a weirdness

00:39:16.600 about this result.

00:39:19.340 And Joel Pollack

00:39:20.640 pointed it out

00:39:21.420 and Ellen Dershowitz 0.50

00:39:23.460 pointed it out.

00:39:25.200 And, you know,

00:39:26.520 they both have

00:39:27.160 legal backgrounds.

00:39:30.340 So, you know,

00:39:31.520 I take their opinion

00:39:32.320 on this

00:39:32.700 because I saw it too

00:39:34.120 but I didn't know

00:39:35.920 that it made sense.

00:39:37.400 And here's what

00:39:38.480 I'm talking about.

00:39:39.820 So apparently

00:39:40.320 the primary claim

00:39:41.900 was that E. Jean Carroll

00:39:43.520 said that Trump

00:39:44.240 raped her 1.00

00:39:44.860 at the dressing room

00:39:46.940 where Bergdorf Goodman.

00:39:49.000 The jury found

00:39:50.240 that they did not

00:39:51.440 believe her story

00:39:52.440 that she was raped.

00:39:56.860 Wait,

00:39:57.180 let me see

00:39:57.500 if I can say this.

00:39:58.360 Well, let me say

00:39:58.940 how Joel said it

00:39:59.740 in a tweet.

00:40:00.600 It is hard to reconcile

00:40:03.140 the jury's finding

00:40:04.180 that Trump

00:40:06.080 did not rape her

00:40:07.260 with his findings

00:40:08.640 that he maliciously

00:40:09.980 defamed her

00:40:10.780 by essentially saying

00:40:12.600 that he did not rape her.

00:40:14.600 All right,

00:40:14.860 so I'm trying to hold

00:40:15.480 this in my head.

00:40:17.080 So the jury

00:40:17.780 agreed with Trump

00:40:18.960 that no rape happened

00:40:21.080 as far as they could tell.

00:40:22.300 But they convicted him,

00:40:26.760 Trump,

00:40:27.780 of agreeing with them.

00:40:31.240 Did I get that right?

00:40:32.380 The jury convicted Trump

00:40:35.040 of agreeing with the jury.

00:40:37.160 Because the jury says

00:40:39.040 the rape didn't happen.

00:40:40.700 Trump says

00:40:41.220 the rape didn't happen.

00:40:43.080 So the jury

00:40:43.700 and Trump agreed.

00:40:45.300 So they convicted him

00:40:46.560 for the thing

00:40:48.620 that they believe

00:40:49.360 he was honest about.

00:40:51.980 They convicted him,

00:40:53.200 not convicted,

00:40:53.900 but he found him

00:40:54.400 liable for lying.

00:40:58.120 Did I get that?

00:41:01.560 Now,

00:41:02.520 what they did find

00:41:03.620 he was liable for,

00:41:05.040 I'll stop using

00:41:05.980 the word guilty

00:41:06.600 because it's a civil case.

00:41:08.640 They did find him

00:41:09.240 liable for

00:41:10.180 sexual battery.

00:41:14.640 Sexual battery,

00:41:15.600 right?

00:41:18.220 Do you know

00:41:19.440 what a sexual battery is?

00:41:22.520 Do you all know

00:41:23.240 what a sexual battery is?

00:41:24.760 Yeah.

00:41:25.380 If you've got a vibrator

00:41:26.840 and it's not the kind

00:41:27.800 that you charge,

00:41:30.460 recharge,

00:41:31.400 you're going to have

00:41:31.980 to put a battery in it.

00:41:33.320 And that's called

00:41:33.780 a sexual battery.

00:41:35.820 You put that

00:41:36.320 on your vibrator.

00:41:38.120 So he was,

00:41:38.960 I guess he's liable

00:41:40.420 for being a battery

00:41:42.220 and a dildo. 0.50

00:41:43.980 Wait, no,

00:41:44.580 that's,

00:41:44.920 I'm sorry,

00:41:45.660 I might have that wrong.

00:41:47.900 No,

00:41:48.400 sexual battery is

00:41:49.700 basically grabbing

00:41:51.220 and touching.

00:41:53.180 Grabbing and touching.

00:41:54.620 And there's nothing

00:41:55.280 funny about that.

00:41:56.840 Nothing funny about that.

00:41:57.900 I'm admonishing myself.

00:42:02.580 There's nothing funny

00:42:03.300 about that.

00:42:07.220 However,

00:42:10.420 do you think

00:42:13.520 anybody else

00:42:14.260 would have been

00:42:14.960 found liable

00:42:17.000 with the same set of facts?

00:42:18.280 It doesn't feel like it,

00:42:22.000 does it?

00:42:23.540 It doesn't feel like

00:42:24.760 anybody in the world

00:42:25.880 except Trump

00:42:27.500 could have gotten

00:42:29.000 12 jurors

00:42:30.180 to agree with a woman

00:42:31.580 who they thought

00:42:32.940 was lying.

00:42:34.020 Remember,

00:42:34.460 the jury concluded

00:42:35.860 that she was lying

00:42:37.580 or that they didn't

00:42:39.180 believe her,

00:42:39.720 which is slightly different.

00:42:41.820 That they didn't

00:42:42.680 believe her

00:42:43.140 and they still

00:42:44.160 found for her.

00:42:45.160 just to hold

00:42:47.260 that in your head.

00:42:48.960 Now,

00:42:49.940 I saw somebody,

00:42:51.340 I won't mention who,

00:42:53.480 say that Trump

00:42:54.380 might have

00:42:54.880 the worst lawyer

00:42:55.700 ever.

00:42:57.940 Because I looked

00:42:58.740 at the facts

00:42:59.360 of this case

00:43:00.020 and I said to myself,

00:43:01.320 I'm not a lawyer,

00:43:05.080 but I have

00:43:06.260 a high confidence

00:43:08.180 I could have won

00:43:09.000 that case.

00:43:10.180 Like on the first try.

00:43:12.620 Did anybody else

00:43:13.280 have that same feeling?

00:43:15.160 Like,

00:43:15.460 I'm not a lawyer,

00:43:16.240 but I feel like

00:43:17.060 I could have won

00:43:17.620 that case.

00:43:19.200 It looked like

00:43:19.900 the world's easiest

00:43:20.680 case to win,

00:43:21.760 honestly.

00:43:23.420 Because it was just

00:43:24.180 a he said,

00:43:24.740 she said.

00:43:26.780 Now,

00:43:27.780 it must be that

00:43:28.760 what,

00:43:30.440 of course,

00:43:30.840 we weren't there

00:43:31.740 for the trial,

00:43:32.420 so,

00:43:33.020 you know,

00:43:33.520 our external view

00:43:34.920 is simplified.

00:43:36.020 There may have been

00:43:36.500 a lot more evidence.

00:43:37.960 But apparently,

00:43:38.820 the important evidence

00:43:40.180 is that she

00:43:40.820 talked to a friend

00:43:42.080 at the time.

00:43:43.420 Or more than one friend.

00:43:45.160 Am I right on that?

00:43:46.560 Is anybody

00:43:47.000 who followed it closely?

00:43:48.480 So the contemporaneous

00:43:49.860 statements tended

00:43:50.840 to be the persuasive ones,

00:43:52.320 right?

00:43:53.900 But how do you know,

00:43:56.300 and let me ask

00:43:57.100 if anybody

00:43:57.820 followed the evidence

00:43:59.140 in that,

00:44:00.160 was there documentation

00:44:01.300 or just memories?

00:44:04.400 Can anybody tell me,

00:44:05.320 is there documentation,

00:44:06.560 like an email

00:44:08.580 or something?

00:44:10.100 Or is it only

00:44:11.460 memories?

00:44:14.480 So all it would take

00:44:15.820 is three of her friends

00:44:17.460 to hate Trump.

00:44:20.940 And you have everything

00:44:21.960 you need,

00:44:22.340 right?

00:44:23.020 So if she had three friends

00:44:24.440 that disliked Trump,

00:44:26.160 but liked her,

00:44:27.720 that's what the jury

00:44:29.340 depended on.

00:44:30.780 Her three friends

00:44:31.820 who don't like Trump.

00:44:32.660 Do you think

00:44:33.920 that in the trial,

00:44:35.500 the other girls,

00:44:36.760 not girls,

00:44:37.560 the other women, 0.99

00:44:38.780 do you think

00:44:39.740 the other women 0.98

00:44:40.420 were asked

00:44:41.000 if they're Trump supporters

00:44:42.080 or Democrats?

00:44:44.780 Do you think

00:44:45.480 any of them

00:44:45.860 are Republicans?

00:44:47.500 Do you think

00:44:48.080 anybody in the trial

00:44:49.040 was a male,

00:44:51.220 MAGA-wearing Republican? 0.63

00:44:53.680 Even one?

00:44:54.680 Do you think

00:44:55.000 there was even one?

00:44:56.120 No, of course not.

00:44:57.460 I don't know,

00:44:59.060 but I don't think

00:44:59.780 you can get

00:45:00.260 12 convictions

00:45:01.680 if one of them

00:45:02.440 had a MAGA hat.

00:45:04.540 Do you?

00:45:05.540 Do you think

00:45:06.160 anybody with a MAGA hat

00:45:07.320 would have voted guilty

00:45:08.180 in this case?

00:45:09.520 And by the way,

00:45:10.300 I'm not saying

00:45:10.980 that he's innocent,

00:45:12.340 just to be clear.

00:45:13.560 I'm saying

00:45:14.140 we don't know.

00:45:15.500 We have no idea.

00:45:17.020 Now, the other thing

00:45:17.700 that seemed like

00:45:18.400 a violation of justice,

00:45:22.100 and I guess

00:45:23.420 this is legal

00:45:24.220 because of the state

00:45:25.640 it's in

00:45:26.160 and the fact

00:45:26.740 that it's a civil case,

00:45:28.300 I don't know

00:45:28.640 the details,

00:45:29.200 but

00:45:30.360 they brought in

00:45:32.500 other accusers

00:45:33.700 from other situations.

00:45:36.440 So they brought in

00:45:37.160 women who said, 1.00

00:45:38.060 oh, he did

00:45:38.540 something to me,

00:45:40.700 you know,

00:45:41.100 sexually inappropriate.

00:45:43.620 Completely unrelated

00:45:44.660 to Eugene Carroll's case,

00:45:47.080 except they were,

00:45:48.240 you know,

00:45:48.920 evocative

00:45:49.500 of a type of behavior.

00:45:51.880 Now,

00:45:52.320 if that were

00:45:52.920 a criminal case,

00:45:53.820 that wouldn't be allowed,

00:45:54.780 right?

00:45:54.980 wouldn't that

00:45:58.340 obviously

00:45:59.560 not be allowed?

00:46:01.040 I thought

00:46:01.420 that was one

00:46:01.860 of the most

00:46:02.120 basic

00:46:02.760 legal standards

00:46:04.560 that you don't

00:46:05.460 say somebody's

00:46:06.160 probably guilty

00:46:06.900 because they do

00:46:07.480 this sort of thing.

00:46:10.120 Depends on the judge

00:46:11.060 or is it

00:46:11.840 threatened by judges?

00:46:13.500 Yeah,

00:46:13.700 I think it has more

00:46:14.200 to do with the fact

00:46:14.840 that it was

00:46:15.140 a civil case.

00:46:17.660 A criminal case

00:46:18.580 would be a different

00:46:19.100 standard.

00:46:20.560 So I don't know

00:46:21.280 enough about the law

00:46:21.940 to be smart about that.

00:46:23.140 That's what I think

00:46:24.580 is true.

00:46:26.400 So,

00:46:27.640 then they played

00:46:28.420 the tape

00:46:29.540 of Trump

00:46:30.140 talking about,

00:46:31.420 you know,

00:46:31.640 the grab-em-by-the-rrr,

00:46:33.480 you know,

00:46:33.780 that famous tape.

00:46:35.800 And of course,

00:46:36.560 the context of that

00:46:37.760 was about

00:46:39.020 the women themselves.

00:46:40.960 It's been interpreted

00:46:41.980 to be Trump

00:46:43.040 saying something

00:46:43.800 about his own behavior.

00:46:45.700 It wasn't.

00:46:47.540 I mean,

00:46:48.200 it also was about

00:46:49.040 his behavior.

00:46:49.500 But he was talking

00:46:50.480 about the women

00:46:51.200 volunteering

00:46:52.660 to be touched

00:46:53.620 or basically

00:46:55.500 instantly surrendering

00:46:57.280 to his celebrity power,

00:47:00.060 which everybody

00:47:01.440 believes is true.

00:47:03.300 Like,

00:47:03.620 anybody who's lived

00:47:04.400 in the real world

00:47:05.380 knows that women 1.00

00:47:06.720 do surrender

00:47:07.520 to power

00:47:08.160 fairly quickly.

00:47:11.980 Happens kind of quickly.

00:47:14.560 And they use that

00:47:17.420 as part of their case.

00:47:18.860 To me,

00:47:20.200 this is the most

00:47:20.800 bullshit case

00:47:21.720 I've ever seen

00:47:22.280 in my life.

00:47:23.260 Which, again,

00:47:23.960 doesn't say he's innocent.

00:47:25.920 I'm just saying

00:47:26.560 that if you're

00:47:27.080 convicting people

00:47:27.880 on this quality

00:47:29.940 of evidence,

00:47:30.540 not convicted,

00:47:31.460 you're finding them

00:47:32.120 liable on this

00:47:32.940 quality of evidence,

00:47:34.460 that's really sketchy.

00:47:37.640 So,

00:47:38.320 my prediction is

00:47:39.220 that Trump

00:47:40.280 will be more popular

00:47:41.760 because of this.

00:47:45.320 Agree or disagree?

00:47:46.200 To me,

00:47:47.760 this paints a picture

00:47:48.640 of Trump

00:47:49.460 being singled out

00:47:50.680 and targeted

00:47:51.220 by a corrupt

00:47:52.300 family enterprise,

00:47:55.460 the Biden enterprise.

00:47:57.400 Because it helps,

00:47:58.540 the two stories

00:47:59.200 are really compatible.

00:48:00.620 Because once you've decided

00:48:02.140 that the Bidens

00:48:03.160 are a criminal family,

00:48:05.460 which I have,

00:48:06.620 I think that's just

00:48:07.480 a fair statement

00:48:08.220 based on what we know

00:48:10.380 from the news.

00:48:11.360 They look like

00:48:11.980 a criminal enterprise.

00:48:12.940 and it looks like

00:48:14.560 it's coordinated

00:48:15.360 and it looks like

00:48:16.640 they're all in on it.

00:48:19.120 So,

00:48:19.920 at the same time

00:48:21.400 the Bidens are outed,

00:48:22.920 you know,

00:48:23.160 the main part

00:48:24.140 of our government

00:48:24.680 is outed as

00:48:25.440 a criminal organization,

00:48:27.120 you see this

00:48:28.000 very peculiar

00:48:29.600 trial

00:48:30.880 where the outcome

00:48:32.980 doesn't look honest.

00:48:34.860 It looks completely

00:48:35.700 political.

00:48:37.140 You juxtapose

00:48:38.480 those two things,

00:48:39.420 I feel like

00:48:41.040 Trump just walks

00:48:42.960 into the job.

00:48:44.820 It feels like

00:48:45.600 he just took away

00:48:46.200 all the competition.

00:48:48.260 So,

00:48:48.800 I don't think

00:48:49.160 Trump's ever had

00:48:49.840 a better news cycle

00:48:50.760 than this week.

00:48:52.880 Agree or disagree.

00:48:54.380 This is Trump's

00:48:55.200 best news cycle

00:48:56.520 of all time.

00:48:58.620 And keep in mind

00:48:59.420 that Trump

00:49:00.600 has survived

00:49:01.380 so many fake claims

00:49:02.980 that

00:49:04.980 it's starting

00:49:06.740 to build a,

00:49:07.600 I don't know,

00:49:09.620 a feeling

00:49:10.300 of invulnerability

00:49:11.400 or inevitability

00:49:13.080 or something.

00:49:14.580 But,

00:49:15.240 I'm not alone.

00:49:18.420 Trump is powering up.

00:49:20.640 Am I wrong?

00:49:22.320 I see Trump

00:49:23.340 powering up.

00:49:24.420 It's only going

00:49:25.060 in one direction.

00:49:26.500 I do not see

00:49:27.480 him limping

00:49:28.860 into the race.

00:49:30.580 He's going to come

00:49:31.440 into this race

00:49:32.020 at full power.

00:49:33.440 And he didn't even

00:49:34.400 do that in 2016.

00:49:35.460 So,

00:49:38.020 we'll see.

00:49:39.040 I think the big

00:49:39.960 variable will be

00:49:41.200 who he actually

00:49:41.880 runs against.

00:49:43.700 That's the only thing

00:49:44.740 that will determine

00:49:45.380 the future,

00:49:46.020 probably.

00:49:46.560 It's probably

00:49:46.880 the number one thing

00:49:48.100 is who's he really

00:49:49.460 going to run against.

00:49:51.260 Otherwise,

00:49:52.680 it's done.

00:49:54.340 If it's Biden,

00:49:55.140 I think it's done.

00:49:56.380 I don't see

00:49:57.100 how Biden can win

00:49:57.940 because of the

00:49:59.860 recent stuff.

00:50:00.820 Dershowitz

00:50:04.060 referred to

00:50:05.760 the jury result

00:50:08.340 as a Rorschach test,

00:50:10.560 meaning that

00:50:11.300 if you think

00:50:12.580 Trump's a guilty

00:50:13.660 kind of guy,

00:50:14.440 you'll see it

00:50:14.960 as confirmation

00:50:15.620 of that.

00:50:16.620 And if you think

00:50:17.220 the Democrats

00:50:18.560 in the system

00:50:19.380 are hunting

00:50:20.400 Republicans,

00:50:21.260 you're going

00:50:21.540 to see that.

00:50:23.280 Which is what I see.

00:50:25.240 That's what I see.

00:50:26.540 I don't know

00:50:27.380 if there were

00:50:27.780 any crime

00:50:28.560 was committed.

00:50:29.340 I have no way

00:50:29.820 to know that.

00:50:30.880 But I do know

00:50:32.280 that the trial

00:50:35.380 looks political

00:50:36.380 to me.

00:50:39.140 All right.

00:50:41.300 What else

00:50:42.000 is happening?

00:50:42.620 All kinds

00:50:43.100 of stuff

00:50:43.420 happening today.

00:50:45.440 Big wave

00:50:46.240 of immigration

00:50:46.940 coming.

00:50:48.920 I always think

00:50:50.560 of money-making

00:50:51.320 schemes.

00:50:53.220 I had to make

00:50:53.720 money on the

00:50:54.240 headlines.

00:50:55.700 And I keep

00:50:56.460 looking at this

00:50:57.100 gigantic wave

00:50:58.840 of immigrants

00:50:59.540 coming in

00:51:00.100 with no end

00:51:00.720 in sight.

00:51:02.480 And then

00:51:03.520 I see all

00:51:03.960 the street

00:51:04.340 people,

00:51:05.300 the drug

00:51:05.860 addicts,

00:51:06.400 who prefer

00:51:07.360 to live

00:51:07.720 outdoors

00:51:08.120 so they

00:51:08.520 can do

00:51:08.780 their drugs.

00:51:09.940 And then

00:51:10.380 I see that

00:51:10.840 they're all

00:51:11.120 getting upgraded

00:51:11.720 with nice

00:51:12.360 tents.

00:51:13.860 And so I

00:51:14.520 asked yesterday

00:51:15.020 on Twitter,

00:51:16.060 is there a

00:51:16.560 company I can

00:51:17.420 invest in

00:51:17.980 now that

00:51:19.460 just is mostly

00:51:20.300 in the

00:51:20.720 tent business?

00:51:22.100 Do they build

00:51:22.560 a lot of

00:51:23.000 tents?

00:51:23.320 because I

00:51:24.880 have a

00:51:25.200 very bad

00:51:25.760 feeling that

00:51:27.700 we're going

00:51:28.040 to need

00:51:28.360 way more

00:51:29.100 tents than

00:51:30.360 we've ever

00:51:30.800 needed before.

00:51:32.360 And it's

00:51:32.740 going to be

00:51:33.100 for a

00:51:34.240 number of

00:51:34.740 reasons that

00:51:35.320 are unrelated.

00:51:37.880 One reason

00:51:38.760 might be it's

00:51:39.380 a cheap

00:51:39.740 vacation and

00:51:41.200 people are

00:51:41.620 feeling the

00:51:42.100 inflation.

00:51:43.980 You need

00:51:44.680 tents,

00:51:45.180 cheap vacation.

00:51:45.880 another might

00:51:47.560 be, and

00:51:51.080 there may

00:51:51.380 be more

00:51:51.860 pent-up

00:51:52.500 demand for

00:51:52.980 vacations

00:51:53.520 because people

00:51:54.260 are still

00:51:54.720 reeling from

00:51:55.440 the pandemic,

00:51:56.200 et cetera.

00:51:57.100 So you've

00:51:57.480 got your

00:51:57.780 homeless,

00:51:58.740 your immigrants,

00:52:00.300 you've got

00:52:00.680 your vacationers,

00:52:03.260 and I think

00:52:03.860 there's going to

00:52:04.320 be another

00:52:04.720 category, which

00:52:05.560 I hate to

00:52:06.080 say it.

00:52:07.080 I believe the

00:52:08.060 outdoor living

00:52:09.020 community is

00:52:10.040 going to keep

00:52:10.480 growing,

00:52:12.060 especially if

00:52:13.060 you get UBI.

00:52:14.960 Imagine you

00:52:15.680 start getting

00:52:16.340 some government

00:52:17.660 payment, but

00:52:18.920 it's not

00:52:19.240 enough to

00:52:19.560 have your

00:52:19.840 own apartment.

00:52:21.540 But it is

00:52:22.360 enough to

00:52:23.420 live where

00:52:23.960 it's usually

00:52:24.820 warm enough.

00:52:26.960 You can live

00:52:27.700 in your own

00:52:28.100 tent, you've

00:52:29.560 got access to

00:52:30.320 some kind of

00:52:30.780 a bathroom

00:52:31.220 somewhere, and

00:52:33.300 you can do

00:52:34.280 fentanyl all

00:52:34.980 day long because

00:52:35.780 you can afford

00:52:36.520 it.

00:52:38.600 I feel like

00:52:39.540 that as a

00:52:40.180 lifestyle choice

00:52:41.040 is going to

00:52:41.500 explode.

00:52:43.200 Because it

00:52:43.980 really is a

00:52:44.620 lifestyle choice

00:52:45.440 at this

00:52:45.800 point, and

00:52:47.640 it's going

00:52:48.240 to grow.

00:52:48.920 So I'm not

00:52:50.020 joking.

00:52:50.720 I'm looking

00:52:51.200 for some

00:52:53.280 tent investments.

00:52:55.900 It's bad

00:52:56.380 news, but

00:52:57.000 maybe you

00:52:58.960 can make

00:52:59.200 something of

00:52:59.700 it.

00:53:00.520 Senator

00:53:01.040 Kennedy

00:53:01.560 is trying

00:53:04.520 to increase

00:53:05.320 the sentences

00:53:06.000 on fentanyl

00:53:06.900 dealers, and

00:53:07.460 I think

00:53:07.700 Cory Booker

00:53:08.420 is trying to

00:53:09.520 stop it.

00:53:09.960 I can't

00:53:12.300 believe that

00:53:12.720 fentanyl

00:53:13.200 dealers had

00:53:15.540 light sentences.

00:53:17.940 It makes

00:53:18.700 complete sense

00:53:19.640 that if

00:53:21.440 you kill

00:53:24.220 somebody and

00:53:25.700 you knew you

00:53:26.220 were selling

00:53:26.660 fentanyl,

00:53:28.240 there's got to

00:53:28.880 be some

00:53:29.440 liability for

00:53:31.880 that.

00:53:32.180 I'm on the

00:53:36.140 side of

00:53:36.580 stiffening the

00:53:37.420 penalties for

00:53:38.020 dealers.

00:53:39.940 I probably

00:53:40.780 would leave

00:53:41.280 alone anybody

00:53:42.060 who had some

00:53:42.860 small amount

00:53:43.600 on them, even

00:53:44.860 if they sold

00:53:45.400 it, if it's a

00:53:46.200 small amount,

00:53:47.560 because that's

00:53:47.980 just too many

00:53:48.520 small lives

00:53:50.120 being destroyed.

00:53:51.160 But if

00:53:51.500 somebody's a

00:53:52.000 major dealer

00:53:52.740 above some

00:53:53.840 quantity, it

00:53:56.000 should be the

00:53:56.440 death penalty.

00:53:57.020 Wow, so

00:54:07.120 many stories

00:54:07.660 today.

00:54:08.500 Oh, Tucker

00:54:09.880 Carlson announced

00:54:10.960 he's going to

00:54:11.480 move his show

00:54:12.080 to Twitter.

00:54:13.120 So he's going

00:54:13.780 to do his

00:54:14.240 same Tucker

00:54:14.940 Carlson show.

00:54:16.420 It'll just

00:54:17.060 stream on

00:54:18.300 Twitter, I

00:54:19.240 assume, to

00:54:20.100 subscribers, but

00:54:22.140 I don't know

00:54:22.540 that.

00:54:23.040 I mean, he

00:54:23.380 might be

00:54:23.740 streaming and

00:54:26.040 then have

00:54:26.340 commercials.

00:54:27.500 Maybe.

00:54:28.180 Whichever

00:54:28.540 would pay

00:54:28.880 more.

00:54:29.820 But, naturally,

00:54:33.680 Tucker feels

00:54:34.500 the safest

00:54:35.060 place for him

00:54:35.760 to be would

00:54:36.260 be on

00:54:36.540 Twitter.

00:54:37.840 Is he

00:54:38.480 right?

00:54:39.900 Is that the

00:54:40.460 safest place

00:54:41.180 for Tucker

00:54:41.640 to be on

00:54:42.200 Twitter?

00:54:43.780 I think so.

00:54:46.100 It feels

00:54:46.800 perfect.

00:54:49.100 Now,

00:54:49.700 unfortunately,

00:54:50.580 it gives the

00:54:51.180 people on the

00:54:51.680 left an

00:54:52.440 argument that

00:54:54.460 Twitter has

00:54:55.160 turned into a

00:54:55.820 right-wing

00:54:56.380 hellhole

00:54:57.100 under Musk.

00:55:00.860 And Tucker

00:55:01.620 will, you

00:55:02.500 know, help

00:55:02.840 them make

00:55:03.220 that argument

00:55:03.760 even though,

00:55:05.420 does Tucker

00:55:06.220 seem extreme

00:55:06.900 right to you?

00:55:09.480 Those of you

00:55:10.280 who have been

00:55:10.440 watching him,

00:55:12.440 I don't even

00:55:13.100 get that.

00:55:14.400 He seems the

00:55:15.200 opposite of

00:55:15.760 extreme right,

00:55:16.520 doesn't he?

00:55:16.920 I would say

00:55:19.280 Tucker is

00:55:20.000 just his own

00:55:20.580 thing.

00:55:21.660 He's not

00:55:22.340 extreme right.

00:55:25.520 He's just

00:55:26.200 whatever makes

00:55:26.820 sense, I

00:55:27.260 think.

00:55:30.760 But he does

00:55:31.620 have some

00:55:32.080 views that

00:55:32.540 would map to

00:55:33.060 the right on

00:55:33.840 abortion, for 0.52

00:55:34.420 example.

00:55:34.760 people.

00:55:37.200 Yeah.

00:55:39.760 Yeah, he's

00:55:40.520 definitely not

00:55:40.980 extreme right,

00:55:42.420 or even

00:55:42.880 close.

00:55:44.860 But that's

00:55:45.680 what Stelter

00:55:46.340 and CNN

00:55:47.200 are saying.

00:55:48.240 They call

00:55:48.820 him a

00:55:49.080 right-wing

00:55:49.520 extremist.

00:55:51.080 So CNN

00:55:51.660 just tweets

00:55:52.280 this as if,

00:55:53.460 I mean,

00:55:53.760 they're a

00:55:54.060 news organization,

00:55:55.720 and they tweet

00:55:56.780 this as if

00:55:57.380 it's a fact,

00:55:58.460 that he's a

00:55:59.020 right-wing

00:55:59.420 extremist.

00:56:00.160 Does that

00:56:02.080 feel like a

00:56:02.580 fact?

00:56:05.000 Not really.

00:56:06.560 All right.

00:56:09.680 Here's a

00:56:10.260 question I'm

00:56:10.660 going to ask

00:56:11.080 you.

00:56:11.580 I asked

00:56:11.960 people on

00:56:12.640 Locals

00:56:12.960 yesterday.

00:56:13.900 So at

00:56:14.120 the moment,

00:56:14.640 the only

00:56:14.900 place you

00:56:15.300 can see

00:56:15.640 the continued

00:56:17.400 Dilbert

00:56:17.920 cartoon,

00:56:19.180 which I

00:56:19.600 call Dilbert

00:56:20.240 Reborn,

00:56:21.060 it's a

00:56:21.460 spicier,

00:56:22.460 naughtier

00:56:22.840 version that

00:56:24.080 would never

00:56:24.480 be allowed

00:56:25.000 in newspapers.

00:56:26.380 It's not

00:56:27.000 gross.

00:56:27.640 It's just

00:56:28.000 stuff that

00:56:28.480 newspapers

00:56:28.920 wouldn't be

00:56:29.400 comfortable

00:56:29.680 with.

00:56:30.160 So it's

00:56:30.640 modern trends

00:56:32.200 and stuff.

00:56:33.020 Nothing

00:56:33.340 disgusting.

00:56:35.680 But right

00:56:36.380 now, the

00:56:36.660 only place

00:56:37.040 you can

00:56:37.240 see it is

00:56:37.720 on the

00:56:38.700 Locals

00:56:39.200 platform by

00:56:40.440 subscription.

00:56:42.480 Now,

00:56:43.420 the question

00:56:45.000 is, if I

00:56:47.180 were to put

00:56:48.220 it on a

00:56:49.360 subscription

00:56:49.840 service on

00:56:50.680 Twitter as

00:56:51.180 well, but

00:56:52.680 Locals

00:56:53.580 remained the

00:56:54.720 bigger entity

00:56:55.800 where I do

00:56:56.260 my live

00:56:56.920 streaming and

00:56:57.480 ban KUs,

00:56:58.320 and I do

00:56:59.440 robots read

00:57:00.040 news and

00:57:00.400 everything

00:57:00.600 else, but

00:57:01.500 would it

00:57:01.740 make sense

00:57:02.140 to have a

00:57:02.520 lower-priced

00:57:03.320 subscription just

00:57:04.820 for Dilbert on

00:57:06.120 Twitter?

00:57:06.900 And if I

00:57:07.340 did, if I

00:57:09.300 charged two

00:57:09.880 to three

00:57:10.200 dollars a

00:57:10.740 month, would

00:57:12.300 anybody want

00:57:13.000 to see it on

00:57:13.440 Twitter?

00:57:16.120 Because then

00:57:16.760 there might be

00:57:17.560 some people on

00:57:18.340 Locals who

00:57:19.520 are only there

00:57:20.100 for the Dilbert

00:57:20.720 comic, and

00:57:22.100 then they could

00:57:22.560 just get it

00:57:22.980 cheaper.

00:57:23.840 So for them,

00:57:24.360 it would be

00:57:24.540 good.

00:57:25.220 The people

00:57:25.620 who are there

00:57:26.020 for the

00:57:26.500 more comprehensive

00:57:27.540 community

00:57:28.500 situation would

00:57:30.100 still get that

00:57:30.780 exactly the

00:57:31.540 same.

00:57:33.020 And then if

00:57:34.060 somebody wanted

00:57:34.500 to see the

00:57:35.020 Dilbert comic,

00:57:36.480 they could see

00:57:36.960 it on Twitter.

00:57:39.800 As long as

00:57:40.520 it's funny,

00:57:41.180 well, you get

00:57:41.780 to decide, and

00:57:42.820 you get to

00:57:43.280 quit after a

00:57:43.900 month if you

00:57:44.280 didn't like it.

00:57:47.280 Now, I know

00:57:47.980 that you would

00:57:48.400 prefer that it

00:57:49.200 be free or

00:57:50.300 99 cents.

00:57:51.600 So when you

00:57:53.180 ask what

00:57:53.660 people are

00:57:54.060 willing to

00:57:54.440 pay, most

00:57:56.500 of the people

00:57:56.880 are going to

00:57:57.260 lowball you

00:57:57.940 because they

00:57:59.020 don't want you

00:57:59.460 to charge a

00:57:59.960 lot.

00:58:02.420 Oh, I

00:58:02.900 should charge

00:58:03.360 420, somebody

00:58:04.300 says.

00:58:05.300 I should

00:58:05.560 charge 420.

00:58:07.900 That'd be

00:58:08.420 funny.

00:58:11.760 Probably not

00:58:12.680 any more

00:58:13.140 Dilbert books

00:58:13.920 for the

00:58:14.740 short term.

00:58:16.020 That might

00:58:16.420 change.

00:58:21.600 I blocked

00:58:22.700 you on

00:58:23.060 Twitter.

00:58:23.460 I'm sure I

00:58:23.940 had a reason

00:58:24.340 for that.

00:58:27.980 All right.

00:58:28.780 Charge 69

00:58:29.700 cents.

00:58:35.860 All right.

00:58:40.140 Yeah, maybe

00:58:40.860 I could just

00:58:41.320 test it.

00:58:42.060 There's the

00:58:42.440 best comment.

00:58:43.620 So, you

00:58:44.080 know, one of

00:58:44.480 the things I

00:58:45.040 continuously harp

00:58:46.680 on is that

00:58:47.480 you don't need

00:58:47.960 to make a

00:58:48.420 decision on

00:58:50.040 anything that

00:58:50.620 you can test

00:58:51.360 small.

00:58:52.540 And I

00:58:52.840 could easily

00:58:53.380 test the

00:58:54.080 subscription

00:58:54.560 feature on

00:58:56.240 Twitter.

00:58:57.380 I'll just

00:58:57.660 see what

00:58:57.900 happens.

00:58:59.720 Just see

00:59:00.120 what happens.

00:59:02.420 All right.

00:59:02.780 My instinct

00:59:03.360 is $2 a

00:59:04.980 month on

00:59:05.840 Twitter for

00:59:06.680 the comic

00:59:07.180 only.

00:59:09.640 The one

00:59:10.560 thing I

00:59:11.040 kind of need

00:59:11.880 to get

00:59:12.200 right before

00:59:14.340 testing it is

00:59:15.120 the price.

00:59:16.000 Because you

00:59:16.500 can't really

00:59:16.840 change the

00:59:17.320 price.

00:59:18.360 Like, if you

00:59:18.780 come in too

00:59:19.240 low, you 0.99

00:59:20.520 can't really

00:59:20.840 raise it.

00:59:21.360 I suppose

00:59:23.380 you could

00:59:23.680 lower it, 0.56

00:59:24.260 but, yeah.

00:59:27.820 I think

00:59:28.660 $2 is an

00:59:30.080 amount that

00:59:30.640 would feel

00:59:31.020 like nothing.

00:59:32.320 Am I

00:59:32.640 right?

00:59:33.480 Would $2 a

00:59:34.920 month feel

00:59:36.520 in your brain

00:59:37.140 like nothing?

00:59:39.900 Because that's

00:59:40.540 what I'm

00:59:40.800 shooting for.

00:59:41.420 I want it to

00:59:41.920 feel like

00:59:42.300 nothing.

00:59:43.780 Yeah, okay,

00:59:44.400 good.

00:59:44.740 People are

00:59:45.100 saying it

00:59:45.380 does feel

00:59:45.680 like nothing.

00:59:46.080 All right.

00:59:47.740 I like that.

00:59:48.460 people wouldn't

00:59:51.340 respect $2.

00:59:54.280 Here's a

00:59:54.900 question for

00:59:55.540 me.

00:59:56.880 Are you

00:59:57.120 familiar with

00:59:57.920 aphantasia and

00:59:59.200 have you written

00:59:59.660 on it?

01:00:01.060 Aphantasia?

01:00:01.740 No.

01:00:04.140 Aphantasia.

01:00:05.480 What's

01:00:05.960 aphantasia?

01:00:08.980 Don't know

01:00:09.560 what that is.

01:00:10.060 How much

01:00:13.980 was I getting

01:00:14.440 from the

01:00:14.840 newspapers?

01:00:16.280 Do you

01:00:16.760 think I'm

01:00:17.100 going to

01:00:17.260 tell you

01:00:17.600 the financial

01:00:18.720 payment of

01:00:19.440 the newspapers?

01:00:21.440 Oh, I

01:00:21.980 can tell you

01:00:22.500 the individual

01:00:23.360 newspapers paid

01:00:25.540 a lot more

01:00:25.960 than $2,

01:00:27.140 but not

01:00:27.920 that much

01:00:28.300 more.

01:00:31.740 Oh,

01:00:32.200 inability to

01:00:32.860 imagine

01:00:33.180 pictures and

01:00:33.920 sounds.

01:00:34.760 I've heard

01:00:35.320 of that.

01:00:36.580 It's hard

01:00:36.940 to imagine

01:00:37.420 it,

01:00:38.080 obviously.

01:00:40.060 having no

01:00:40.900 imagination.

01:00:42.280 Well, it

01:00:42.740 sounds like

01:00:43.220 being an

01:00:43.580 NPC,

01:00:44.120 doesn't it?

01:00:45.320 I would

01:00:45.860 think that

01:00:46.240 an NPC

01:00:46.700 would have

01:00:47.100 no

01:00:47.280 imagination.

01:00:52.360 So you're

01:00:53.100 getting

01:00:53.280 newspaper

01:00:53.820 prices?

01:00:54.540 No.

01:00:55.420 Newspapers

01:00:56.020 pay by the

01:00:56.620 week.

01:00:58.160 So a

01:00:58.660 typical

01:00:58.940 newspaper

01:00:59.420 might pay

01:01:00.200 $10 to

01:01:01.560 $25 a

01:01:02.520 week for

01:01:03.220 a comic.

01:01:05.700 So that

01:01:06.540 would be

01:01:06.860 many times

01:01:07.720 more than

01:01:08.140 what we're

01:01:08.420 talking about

01:01:08.960 because we're

01:01:09.600 talking about

01:01:10.060 $2 for a

01:01:10.920 month.

01:01:11.920 Very

01:01:12.180 different.

01:01:14.080 All right.

01:01:15.780 How much

01:01:16.440 am I

01:01:16.660 offering to

01:01:17.280 pay you

01:01:17.540 to read

01:01:17.820 Dilbert?

01:01:18.320 Good

01:01:18.620 question.

01:01:21.240 All right.

01:01:22.380 Talked

01:01:22.900 about that.

01:01:26.080 Oh,

01:01:26.700 here's

01:01:26.940 something that

01:01:27.420 I've heard

01:01:27.800 now from

01:01:28.880 three different

01:01:29.720 sources.

01:01:30.940 Now,

01:01:31.260 all of them

01:01:31.700 are Fox

01:01:32.260 News sources,

01:01:33.580 but I like

01:01:34.560 hearing it.

01:01:35.360 So it's

01:01:35.800 harking back

01:01:36.600 to reparations.

01:01:37.360 Jack Brewer,

01:01:40.320 I saw him

01:01:41.460 today.

01:01:43.480 He's black 0.91

01:01:44.500 because it's

01:01:45.140 important to

01:01:45.640 the story.

01:01:47.000 And he's

01:01:48.660 suggesting that

01:01:49.340 reparations should

01:01:50.300 be in the

01:01:50.660 form of

01:01:51.180 education.

01:01:53.640 In other

01:01:54.000 words,

01:01:54.700 making more

01:01:55.380 effort to

01:01:55.820 make sure

01:01:56.140 that black 1.00

01:01:56.980 kids can

01:01:57.540 get a good

01:01:58.040 education.

01:01:58.520 I would

01:01:59.220 extend that

01:01:59.760 to adult

01:02:00.880 job training

01:02:02.120 skills.

01:02:03.360 But you

01:02:03.980 might remember

01:02:04.500 that that

01:02:04.900 was an

01:02:05.460 idea I

01:02:05.960 floated a

01:02:07.140 few years

01:02:07.520 ago, that

01:02:09.200 we're never

01:02:09.720 going to

01:02:10.020 agree to

01:02:10.500 cash payments

01:02:11.200 for reparations.

01:02:12.700 But if

01:02:14.140 you say to

01:02:14.820 the non-black 1.00

01:02:16.020 members of

01:02:16.880 the United

01:02:17.200 States, how

01:02:18.720 about we

01:02:19.140 make sure

01:02:19.560 that black 1.00

01:02:20.340 kids get a

01:02:20.920 good education

01:02:21.620 from this

01:02:22.200 point on,

01:02:23.540 suddenly that's

01:02:24.540 a whole

01:02:24.780 different

01:02:25.060 conversation.

01:02:26.220 Because if

01:02:26.900 you tell me

01:02:27.500 you want

01:02:28.020 some of my

01:02:28.680 money through

01:02:29.620 taxes to,

01:02:31.660 you know,

01:02:31.800 extra money

01:02:32.460 to make

01:02:33.160 sure that

01:02:33.600 there are

01:02:34.340 more good

01:02:35.740 black citizens

01:02:36.780 in America

01:02:37.380 and fewer

01:02:38.100 people who

01:02:38.620 are struggling,

01:02:39.540 I would say

01:02:40.260 that's good

01:02:40.680 for me.

01:02:42.000 Wouldn't

01:02:42.280 you?

01:02:44.080 That's good

01:02:44.820 for me.

01:02:45.780 I would like

01:02:46.300 the inner

01:02:46.740 cities to

01:02:47.300 be, you

01:02:48.220 know,

01:02:48.360 wondrous

01:02:49.040 miracles of

01:02:50.700 success and

01:02:52.180 prosperity.

01:02:53.360 Then I can

01:02:54.220 go there.

01:02:55.840 The more

01:02:56.480 places I can

01:02:57.180 go that are

01:02:58.440 nice places

01:02:59.160 with no crime

01:03:00.160 and things

01:03:00.780 are working,

01:03:01.220 well that's

01:03:02.160 all good

01:03:02.460 for me.

01:03:03.020 I'd pay

01:03:03.400 extra for

01:03:03.900 that.

01:03:04.900 And I've

01:03:06.040 said before

01:03:06.620 that helping

01:03:08.160 the people

01:03:08.620 who are in

01:03:09.000 the deepest

01:03:09.440 hole is

01:03:10.860 where you

01:03:11.140 get the

01:03:11.400 most bang

01:03:11.840 for your

01:03:12.140 buck.

01:03:13.060 Because taking

01:03:13.840 somebody from

01:03:14.440 not having a

01:03:15.160 job to

01:03:15.920 having a good

01:03:16.520 job, that's

01:03:18.080 the biggest

01:03:18.420 increase you

01:03:19.000 can get.

01:03:20.540 They go from

01:03:21.360 being a drag 1.00

01:03:22.320 on society to

01:03:23.200 a benefit.

01:03:23.940 You can't

01:03:24.320 beat that.

01:03:24.800 So that's

01:03:26.500 why education

01:03:27.140 is such a

01:03:27.680 good lever

01:03:28.180 and why

01:03:30.600 you could

01:03:31.000 talk me

01:03:31.460 into it

01:03:31.980 because that's

01:03:33.000 me giving

01:03:33.480 money to

01:03:34.000 other people

01:03:34.640 that I would

01:03:35.740 have a high

01:03:36.200 degree of

01:03:36.660 confidence would

01:03:37.420 come back to

01:03:37.980 me indirectly.

01:03:39.760 Does that make

01:03:40.500 sense?

01:03:41.220 I wouldn't

01:03:41.820 mind paying

01:03:42.240 extra for

01:03:42.980 educating the

01:03:43.900 people in the

01:03:44.420 deepest hole

01:03:45.100 if it works

01:03:46.220 because that's

01:03:47.540 going to come

01:03:47.900 back to me in a

01:03:48.480 better society

01:03:49.180 and I want

01:03:50.000 that.

01:03:50.200 So just my

01:03:51.080 self-interest

01:03:52.380 would be to

01:03:54.300 favor reparations

01:03:55.620 in the form of

01:03:56.360 education.

01:03:57.480 So anyway, I

01:03:58.000 saw Jack Brewer

01:03:59.060 say something

01:03:59.940 along those

01:04:00.420 lines.

01:04:00.840 I saw Greg

01:04:01.360 Gottfeld say

01:04:02.000 something along

01:04:02.540 those lines

01:04:02.960 on the five

01:04:03.540 and Harold

01:04:04.900 Ford Jr.

01:04:06.700 seemed to be

01:04:07.220 on the same

01:04:07.620 page.

01:04:09.120 So this is

01:04:10.340 all Fox

01:04:11.260 News-ish so

01:04:12.540 far, but I

01:04:14.120 do really like

01:04:14.920 the fact that

01:04:15.460 there's a

01:04:15.820 middle, there's

01:04:16.500 a place to

01:04:17.100 meet.

01:04:18.600 For all the

01:04:19.860 bad feelings

01:04:20.620 and racial

01:04:21.880 divisiveness,

01:04:24.060 there's absolutely

01:04:25.060 a place in

01:04:25.660 the middle

01:04:26.000 where if

01:04:28.240 black Americans

01:04:28.980 are willing

01:04:29.580 to take

01:04:31.180 the help,

01:04:33.620 Republicans

01:04:34.180 would probably

01:04:34.700 step up and

01:04:35.560 say, yeah,

01:04:36.220 if education

01:04:37.240 is what you're

01:04:37.760 talking about.

01:04:38.780 But with

01:04:39.880 one caveat,

01:04:41.240 the best way

01:04:42.600 to make it

01:04:43.000 happen is to

01:04:44.260 fix education

01:04:45.020 for everybody

01:04:45.660 who's in a

01:04:46.540 bad place.

01:04:47.840 If you make

01:04:48.680 it only black

01:04:49.480 people education,

01:04:50.620 you're going

01:04:51.160 to have

01:04:51.320 trouble.

01:04:52.340 But if you

01:04:52.980 say, all

01:04:53.560 right, this

01:04:54.040 is mostly

01:04:54.560 for reparations,

01:04:56.500 but it's

01:04:57.600 also available

01:04:58.220 to everybody.

01:04:59.540 So we're

01:05:00.100 not going to

01:05:00.500 exclude you

01:05:01.180 for not

01:05:01.540 being black,

01:05:02.340 but we're

01:05:02.960 doing it for

01:05:03.660 the reason

01:05:04.220 that systemic

01:05:05.980 racism has

01:05:06.800 created this

01:05:07.400 problem.

01:05:08.120 We're trying

01:05:08.740 to make it

01:05:09.120 better, as

01:05:10.760 long as it

01:05:11.400 doesn't exclude 0.81

01:05:12.300 anybody who's

01:05:13.020 at the low

01:05:13.520 end of the

01:05:14.120 economic

01:05:15.220 situation.

01:05:18.820 Yeah, reparations

01:05:19.500 for all.

01:05:21.420 All right.

01:05:24.280 That's a very

01:05:25.000 positive trend.

01:05:29.000 I saw this,

01:05:30.180 that it was a

01:05:30.860 story that

01:05:33.020 now that the

01:05:34.260 50, you

01:05:35.320 know, ex-Intel

01:05:36.040 people who

01:05:36.760 signed that

01:05:37.260 letter about

01:05:38.060 Hunter's laptop,

01:05:39.580 now the story

01:05:40.380 is that maybe

01:05:41.140 people associated

01:05:42.420 with the CIA

01:05:43.200 were behind

01:05:44.880 getting the

01:05:45.660 signatures on

01:05:47.060 that.

01:05:48.560 That's in the

01:05:49.340 news today.

01:05:51.000 And I said

01:05:51.820 to myself,

01:05:53.060 is this

01:05:54.300 Groundhog Day?

01:05:55.720 That's the one

01:05:56.500 thing we knew

01:05:56.960 for sure.

01:05:58.180 The one thing

01:05:59.000 we knew for

01:05:59.480 sure is that

01:06:00.740 the CIA was

01:06:01.540 involved.

01:06:03.900 And again,

01:06:05.380 I don't know

01:06:06.100 who needs to

01:06:06.660 hear this,

01:06:07.920 but there's no

01:06:08.520 such thing as 0.74

01:06:09.200 an ex-CIA

01:06:10.040 agent.

01:06:11.880 It's like being

01:06:12.660 an ex-Marine.

01:06:15.240 You know,

01:06:15.660 technically it's

01:06:16.700 true.

01:06:17.560 I mean, in a

01:06:18.280 technical sense,

01:06:19.180 you could be an

01:06:19.740 ex-Marine.

01:06:21.320 And you could be

01:06:21.980 an ex-CIA

01:06:26.600 person.

01:06:27.340 But not

01:06:27.760 really.

01:06:29.300 Not really.

01:06:31.240 Not in any

01:06:32.220 practical way.

01:06:33.500 You're still

01:06:33.940 going to be

01:06:34.340 friendly to

01:06:35.020 them, do a

01:06:36.460 favor, act in

01:06:37.540 their interest,

01:06:39.160 you know, act in

01:06:40.220 character, based

01:06:42.680 on the character

01:06:43.260 that you

01:06:43.600 developed being

01:06:44.980 there.

01:06:45.440 Same as a 0.94

01:06:46.140 Marine.

01:06:47.460 So, yeah, if

01:06:48.740 you see a

01:06:49.180 Marine acting

01:06:49.880 like a Marine

01:06:50.660 after they've

01:06:51.520 gotten out of

01:06:52.000 the service,

01:06:53.220 it's because

01:06:53.820 they're a

01:06:54.080 Marine.

01:06:56.100 That's who

01:06:56.600 they are.

01:06:57.360 They got

01:06:57.700 trained that

01:06:58.160 way.

01:06:58.340 That's who

01:06:58.620 they are now.

01:07:00.240 So, was

01:07:04.180 Ray Epps

01:07:04.580 an ex-Marine?

01:07:06.620 Is that true?

01:07:07.340 Anyway, I

01:07:13.660 thought this

01:07:14.480 was a story

01:07:15.080 that was

01:07:15.800 already known.

01:07:17.580 So, I don't

01:07:17.920 know if there's

01:07:18.340 a real story

01:07:18.920 here.

01:07:20.340 Now, China is 0.95

01:07:21.400 being extra

01:07:21.960 dangerous to

01:07:22.600 businesses.

01:07:23.300 Apparently,

01:07:23.760 there's big

01:07:25.020 consulting

01:07:25.500 companies that

01:07:27.260 help American

01:07:28.020 companies and

01:07:28.800 probably others

01:07:29.360 do business

01:07:30.760 in China.

01:07:32.300 And China's 0.92

01:07:32.960 mad at these

01:07:33.480 consulting

01:07:33.920 companies because

01:07:35.040 it thinks that

01:07:35.960 they're giving

01:07:36.940 Chinese secrets

01:07:38.000 away to

01:07:38.400 American

01:07:38.780 companies.

01:07:39.700 So, they've

01:07:40.240 raided them

01:07:40.820 and they're

01:07:41.120 putting the

01:07:41.480 pressure on them.

01:07:42.540 Now, here's

01:07:42.980 the thing.

01:07:44.140 If you're an 0.51

01:07:44.940 American company,

01:07:46.580 there's a reason

01:07:47.380 that you hire

01:07:48.140 these kinds of

01:07:49.180 consultants.

01:07:50.740 And the reason

01:07:51.300 is it's too

01:07:51.960 dangerous to

01:07:52.980 do business

01:07:53.460 in China unless

01:07:54.920 you've got

01:07:55.340 somebody there

01:07:56.160 who's really

01:07:57.300 plugged in.

01:07:58.560 So, they get

01:07:59.360 these plugged

01:07:59.920 in consultants

01:08:00.620 who apparently

01:08:02.400 are plugged

01:08:02.840 into the

01:08:03.240 Chinese system

01:08:04.040 but also

01:08:05.140 advising.

01:08:05.580 And that's

01:08:06.880 how they

01:08:07.120 can get

01:08:07.480 them safely

01:08:08.040 because they've

01:08:08.920 got these

01:08:09.260 good consultants

01:08:11.180 who can get

01:08:11.780 them a

01:08:12.000 foothold there.

01:08:13.440 But now

01:08:14.100 China's cracking 0.94

01:08:15.100 down on those

01:08:15.780 consultants.

01:08:18.100 Basically, it's

01:08:19.120 impossible now

01:08:20.020 to start a

01:08:20.580 business in

01:08:21.100 China at a 0.92

01:08:22.580 risk which

01:08:23.440 an American

01:08:23.940 company would

01:08:24.680 consider okay.

01:08:27.980 China's 0.76

01:08:28.620 basically closed

01:08:29.620 the door on

01:08:30.160 American business.

01:08:31.540 They don't know

01:08:32.180 it because that

01:08:33.360 wasn't their

01:08:33.920 intention.

01:08:34.480 they don't

01:08:35.620 know it.

01:08:37.220 But the

01:08:38.540 zeitgeist

01:08:39.240 against China

01:08:40.560 is so strong

01:08:41.500 that if you

01:08:42.540 take away that

01:08:43.240 last little

01:08:44.100 psychological

01:08:45.200 protection and

01:08:46.440 actual protection

01:08:47.300 of these

01:08:48.460 consultants being

01:08:49.400 able to

01:08:50.360 grease your

01:08:51.220 way in,

01:08:52.300 that's probably

01:08:53.220 the last

01:08:53.900 straw.

01:08:55.540 Like, no

01:08:55.960 new company

01:08:56.740 of any size

01:08:58.060 would go in

01:08:59.260 there under

01:08:59.860 this level of

01:09:00.880 risk.

01:09:01.740 There's way

01:09:02.380 too much

01:09:02.780 political risk.

01:09:03.640 risk.

01:09:04.360 And as I've

01:09:05.140 been saying

01:09:05.500 for some

01:09:05.900 time, do

01:09:07.380 you remember

01:09:07.680 when people

01:09:08.240 were laughing

01:09:08.840 at me when

01:09:09.840 I said we

01:09:10.300 were going to

01:09:10.660 divest from 0.71

01:09:11.380 China? 0.73

01:09:13.000 Does anybody

01:09:13.680 remember how

01:09:14.460 you laughed

01:09:15.300 back in

01:09:16.380 2018?

01:09:17.900 It was

01:09:18.480 ridiculous,

01:09:19.140 wasn't it?

01:09:20.200 Like the

01:09:20.800 idea that

01:09:21.460 was just way

01:09:22.520 beyond the

01:09:23.000 pale.

01:09:23.920 And now the

01:09:24.680 only thing we're

01:09:25.200 talking about is

01:09:25.800 how fast it

01:09:26.400 will happen.

01:09:27.940 Am I right?

01:09:29.080 We're now only

01:09:30.140 talking about how

01:09:30.880 quickly it will

01:09:31.600 happen.

01:09:32.020 It's just a

01:09:32.520 given now.

01:09:33.660 It's going to

01:09:34.080 have to

01:09:34.320 happen.

01:09:39.360 Yeah, the

01:09:40.240 get out of

01:09:40.660 China program.

01:09:42.620 All right,

01:09:43.400 so China's

01:09:44.060 unsafe for

01:09:44.540 business.

01:09:45.820 And that,

01:09:46.240 ladies and 0.98

01:09:46.580 gentlemen, is

01:09:47.340 all I needed

01:09:47.840 to say today.

01:09:48.720 Probably the

01:09:49.440 best live

01:09:49.960 stream you've

01:09:50.560 ever seen.

01:09:51.500 How effective

01:09:57.300 will be a

01:09:58.080 Tucker Trump

01:09:59.080 Twitter interview?

01:10:00.420 Well, he's

01:10:01.660 already interviewed

01:10:02.260 him recently.

01:10:03.380 I'm sure he'll

01:10:03.780 do it again.

01:10:07.460 Yeah.

01:10:09.580 Well, China 0.94

01:10:10.400 should not have

01:10:11.060 provided fentanyl

01:10:13.060 that killed my

01:10:13.880 stepson.

01:10:14.280 They had it

01:10:16.060 coming.

01:10:16.260 All right.

01:10:21.280 Just looking at

01:10:22.280 your comments,

01:10:23.440 see if I

01:10:23.780 missed anything.

01:10:27.420 How do I

01:10:28.140 rate Comer's

01:10:29.020 persuasion

01:10:29.600 technique?

01:10:30.740 Well, Comer

01:10:31.720 doesn't need

01:10:32.220 much persuasion

01:10:33.100 because Comer,

01:10:34.640 it looks like

01:10:35.260 he found the

01:10:36.600 goods.

01:10:37.900 So if you

01:10:38.940 have the

01:10:39.320 goods,

01:10:40.720 you probably

01:10:42.140 have the

01:10:42.460 goods.

01:10:42.680 So I

01:10:43.780 don't think

01:10:44.280 he needs

01:10:44.580 much

01:10:44.820 technique,

01:10:45.700 but he's

01:10:46.520 not doing

01:10:46.900 anything wrong.

01:10:48.240 So I

01:10:48.800 saw no

01:10:49.180 mistakes.

01:10:52.080 I have

01:10:52.860 wondered why

01:10:53.480 he's the

01:10:53.920 one leading

01:10:54.380 this up.

01:10:55.200 Have you?

01:10:56.580 Have you

01:10:57.200 wondered what

01:10:57.700 made him

01:10:58.180 the choice?

01:11:02.640 Yeah.

01:11:03.240 Because he's

01:11:03.560 not a lawyer.

01:11:05.140 There's so

01:11:05.740 many lawyers

01:11:06.320 in government.

01:11:08.920 Wouldn't

01:11:09.160 you naturally,

01:11:10.300 you know,

01:11:10.740 you think it's

01:11:11.220 going to be a

01:11:11.620 Jim Jordan

01:11:12.100 type?

01:11:12.680 Just another

01:11:13.180 lawyer.

01:11:15.320 But he's a

01:11:16.020 business person,

01:11:16.800 like a farmer

01:11:17.380 or something.

01:11:18.720 Former,

01:11:19.240 what was he?

01:11:19.640 Former banker?

01:11:21.120 I thought he

01:11:21.740 was a former

01:11:22.220 farmer.

01:11:23.640 He was a

01:11:23.960 banker?

01:11:25.060 Comer?

01:11:27.200 Comer was a

01:11:27.880 banker.

01:11:31.000 Okay.

01:11:34.960 Look at his

01:11:35.620 posse.

01:11:36.620 Who's his

01:11:37.100 posse?

01:11:39.380 Who is

01:11:40.140 Comer's

01:11:40.820 posse?

01:11:42.680 He said a

01:11:44.520 banker this

01:11:45.020 month?

01:11:45.800 Former banker

01:11:46.580 farmer.

01:11:49.640 Well, he

01:11:50.220 must be pretty

01:11:50.800 clever if he

01:11:51.480 went from

01:11:51.880 farming to

01:11:52.860 banking.

01:11:57.840 Interesting.

01:11:58.360 All right.

01:12:02.000 All right,

01:12:02.800 ladies and 0.98

01:12:03.220 gentlemen,

01:12:03.560 that's all.

01:12:04.220 I don't care

01:12:04.620 about George

01:12:05.120 Santos.

01:12:06.440 Israel is

01:12:07.100 being attacked

01:12:07.600 by rockets.

01:12:09.000 That feels

01:12:09.580 like an

01:12:09.940 evergreen

01:12:10.380 story,

01:12:11.020 except that

01:12:11.580 there's a

01:12:12.060 lot of

01:12:12.300 them today.

01:12:15.820 He's a

01:12:16.400 fine-toothed

01:12:17.120 Comer.

01:12:17.480 All right.

01:12:24.480 Comer,

01:12:25.120 former banker,

01:12:26.480 farmer.

01:12:30.240 Instead of

01:12:30.760 paying coyotes.

01:12:35.140 Yeah, the

01:12:35.680 religion war is 0.91

01:12:36.380 pretty spooky,

01:12:37.040 isn't it?

01:12:39.540 All right,

01:12:40.220 that's all I

01:12:40.600 got for now.

01:12:41.660 YouTube,

01:12:42.280 thanks for

01:12:42.640 joining.

01:12:43.060 I'll see you

01:12:43.580 tomorrow.

01:12:44.480 Best lives

01:12:44.980 you've ever

01:12:45.160 been.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - May 10, 2023

Episode 2104 Scott Adams： Biden Criminal Enterprise Outed, Trump Proves Justice System Isn't, More

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript