Real Coffee with Scott Adams - May 24, 2023


Episode 2118 Scott Adams: DeSantis Announces & Trump Pounces, Mental Illness, Trans Bans, Fear Map


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 20 minutes

Words per Minute

143.04407

Word Count

11,552

Sentence Count

806

Misogynist Sentences

7

Hate Speech Sentences

57


Summary

This week on the highlight of civilization: the internet stops working in the afternoon, and a visual illusion that can change the way you see the world. Plus, a new invention that keeps the lights on for a little longer.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Do-do-do-do-do-do, do-do-do-do.
00:00:04.500 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the Highlight of Civilization.
00:00:09.460 Today, featuring, I know, hold on, electricity.
00:00:15.240 Yeah, yeah, today we're going to do the show with electricity.
00:00:18.640 See if that keeps the lights on for a little bit longer.
00:00:21.500 And if you'd like to take your experience up to levels that have never been experienced before,
00:00:26.980 well, all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tankard, chalice or stein, a canteen, chug or flax, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:34.660 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.
00:00:37.660 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine of the day that makes everything better.
00:00:42.040 It's called the simultaneous sip and it happens now.
00:00:48.960 Ah, surprisingly delicious.
00:00:54.800 Oh, that's good stuff.
00:00:56.980 All right, I'd like to begin by putting you all into tech support for a moment.
00:01:04.360 Does anybody else have the experience lately, and I can't tell if it's an internet problem or a Scott problem,
00:01:11.600 that your internet is working fine, that you can test and there's plenty of signal,
00:01:16.600 but some of the main websites you go to just stop working in the afternoon?
00:01:21.120 Does anybody have that problem?
00:01:22.320 Is there something like, oh, okay, yes, I'm getting a lot of yeses.
00:01:28.440 I thought I was crazy.
00:01:29.800 For example, my internet can be blazing at, you know, several hundred megabits per second and I can check it.
00:01:39.420 At the same time that Instagram isn't working and then I'll go to Twitter, I'll be like, ah, Instagram isn't working, I'll go over to Twitter and Twitter won't work.
00:01:48.320 So then I'll say, well, I'll check my Gmail and it won't work.
00:01:54.620 And it can last for hours.
00:01:57.180 Are you all having, so you're all having the same problem, right?
00:02:00.040 A number of you are having this problem.
00:02:01.520 Is there some kind of common, how could there be a common element of any of that?
00:02:10.280 There must be something common.
00:02:12.860 Well, I don't know what it is.
00:02:14.760 All right, well, I'm glad it's not just me, but there are times in the afternoon where I can't use my internet at all.
00:02:21.280 And here's the weird thing.
00:02:23.300 My 5G stops at the same time.
00:02:26.700 I don't know what's going on.
00:02:28.240 So I always think, oh, if my internet's not working, I'll switch over to my 5G.
00:02:32.820 It goes down the same time, all the time.
00:02:34.880 I don't know why.
00:02:36.880 All right.
00:02:38.840 If you're not watching the new Dilbert Reborn comic, available only to subscribers here on Locals,
00:02:45.920 or if you subscribe on Twitter, you only get the comic.
00:02:50.580 And Dilbert is still trying to deal with his new Karen 3000 AI sex bot.
00:02:58.240 And I will just summarize by saying, it's still not going well.
00:03:02.760 It's not going well.
00:03:04.880 Well, I saw today a visual illusion that mirrors the Yanni and Laurel.
00:03:10.600 You know the audio illusion where some people hear Yanni and some people hear Laurel?
00:03:16.280 And you've probably seen on the internet that that illusion has been expanded.
00:03:21.760 You can have a list of something like 10 different sentences that if you're reading the sentence,
00:03:28.620 the audio that's always the same sounds like the sentence you're reading.
00:03:32.180 And then you go down to the next sentence, and the audio instantly changes in your mind, but not in reality.
00:03:39.300 In reality, it's always the same.
00:03:40.940 But in your mind, it changes to exactly the next sentence, which has nothing to do with the sentence above it.
00:03:47.000 And then you can repeat that nine times.
00:03:50.260 Every sentence you read, completely different sentences,
00:03:52.880 the audio instantly changes to the sentence you're reading.
00:03:57.800 Now, if that didn't freak you out enough,
00:04:01.420 you can do that with visual stuff as well.
00:04:05.280 So I tweeted, if you want to see it,
00:04:07.620 there's a visual illusion where if you concentrate at a dot in the center,
00:04:12.820 sometimes you see green, sometimes you see purple,
00:04:15.400 and sometimes all the dots disappear and turn into one green dot.
00:04:20.200 And all of it is based on kind of wanting to see it.
00:04:24.980 You just concentrate in one place,
00:04:27.140 and the entire visual field changes while you watch it.
00:04:31.120 Now, if that doesn't tell you
00:04:32.840 that you've always been living in a complete subjective bubble of reality,
00:04:38.360 that your bubble and my bubble do not match,
00:04:43.460 it should.
00:04:43.960 Yeah, I mean, that's about the best evidence you could ever have
00:04:49.080 that we don't live in the same worlds with each other.
00:04:52.080 We're imagining that the other has experienced something like we're imagining,
00:04:56.520 but it's pure imagination.
00:04:58.480 Your little world and mine, so different.
00:05:01.640 And we'll never know.
00:05:03.200 We will never know.
00:05:05.360 All right.
00:05:10.040 Yesterday, if you were watching from,
00:05:12.420 if you're watching my show from YouTube,
00:05:14.540 you knew that the video crapped out
00:05:17.960 just because I didn't have my iPad charged up enough,
00:05:21.480 and you missed the big reveal.
00:05:24.540 I promised you that I was going to show
00:05:26.840 that Carrie Lake's challenge in Arizona,
00:05:30.540 which said that the signature matching
00:05:33.660 had obviously not been done,
00:05:35.920 or at least not done well,
00:05:37.260 because the claim was that 274,000 signatures
00:05:42.380 were matched,
00:05:45.240 or at least looked at for a match,
00:05:48.140 in two seconds.
00:05:50.960 And I claimed that I could do that right in front of you.
00:05:56.480 274,000 signature matches,
00:05:59.000 and I'm going to do it in less than two seconds.
00:06:02.740 Do you believe I could do it?
00:06:04.980 Well, if I remember,
00:06:08.640 on this board are two signatures.
00:06:12.540 And I'd like to demonstrate
00:06:13.880 that I can do a signature match
00:06:17.580 in under two seconds.
00:06:18.720 It takes a little stretching.
00:06:24.480 It's not something you can do right away.
00:06:26.940 Let's see if I can get this.
00:06:28.940 All right.
00:06:30.160 You can set the timer.
00:06:32.240 Set the timer for two seconds.
00:06:34.200 I'm going to turn around quickly
00:06:35.300 and see if I can do a signature match.
00:06:40.060 How was it?
00:06:41.000 Was that under two seconds?
00:06:44.380 They do not match.
00:06:47.000 They do not match.
00:06:49.040 How did I do?
00:06:51.580 Pretty good, wasn't it?
00:06:53.320 I'm pretty sure I got that
00:06:54.700 in a little under one second.
00:06:57.400 Maybe a little over one second.
00:06:59.300 But two seconds was plenty.
00:07:01.680 I had plenty of time.
00:07:03.340 Now, you might be confused
00:07:05.100 because I said I was going to do
00:07:06.580 274,000 of them in two seconds.
00:07:11.080 Did I say that?
00:07:12.720 That's what the news said, didn't it?
00:07:14.480 Didn't the news say that
00:07:15.700 there were 274,000 in two seconds?
00:07:19.160 Well, not really.
00:07:20.740 No, not really.
00:07:21.940 What the news said was
00:07:23.300 per signature match.
00:07:26.760 Two seconds per signature match.
00:07:29.620 Which I just proved.
00:07:31.120 I just did it in less than two seconds.
00:07:33.660 Now, of course,
00:07:34.580 that doesn't answer all the questions.
00:07:35.960 I'm really just mocking
00:07:38.180 the quality of the news.
00:07:40.420 So I'm not making any real point
00:07:42.100 about the election itself.
00:07:43.720 I'm just mad at the news
00:07:45.300 for telling you that
00:07:46.800 what that really meant
00:07:48.300 was all 274,000
00:07:50.180 happened in two seconds.
00:07:51.880 It was two seconds each,
00:07:54.520 which is plenty of time.
00:07:56.840 Now, here's the part
00:07:58.380 I don't know.
00:07:59.000 How do you do a signature match?
00:08:03.440 Do you have to fumble around
00:08:04.920 and find two things
00:08:06.080 before you do the match?
00:08:08.320 Or are they presented to you
00:08:10.500 on a screen
00:08:11.240 and you just look at them?
00:08:13.520 Because if they're presented
00:08:14.640 to you on a screen,
00:08:15.600 let's say in a column,
00:08:16.880 where all you're doing
00:08:17.840 is seeing if this one
00:08:18.640 matches this one,
00:08:19.720 you can just take your finger
00:08:21.040 and run right down the page.
00:08:23.060 Couldn't you?
00:08:24.700 Is it on a screen
00:08:25.800 or are you looking at it
00:08:26.700 on two pieces of paper
00:08:27.740 that you have to like fuss with
00:08:29.860 and find the two pieces of paper?
00:08:32.740 Does anybody know
00:08:33.540 how that works?
00:08:35.640 It's on a screen,
00:08:36.660 somebody says.
00:08:38.160 If the two signatures
00:08:39.340 are on a screen
00:08:40.060 next to each other,
00:08:41.620 you can do that
00:08:42.840 in two seconds
00:08:43.540 pretty easily.
00:08:45.560 That's not even a challenge.
00:08:47.620 Because they're not
00:08:48.360 looking for exact,
00:08:49.940 they're not looking for,
00:08:50.840 oh, you dotted your I differently.
00:08:53.120 They're looking for
00:08:53.980 like massively different signatures
00:08:55.780 or like one's missing
00:08:57.280 or something.
00:08:58.420 They're not looking
00:08:59.320 for small differences.
00:09:01.360 Am I wrong about that?
00:09:03.260 I don't think I'm wrong.
00:09:04.740 Anyway,
00:09:05.160 so this is more a comment
00:09:06.120 about the quality
00:09:07.460 of the news coverage.
00:09:09.260 It's not a statement
00:09:10.440 in any way
00:09:11.220 about whether the election
00:09:12.240 was fair or not fair.
00:09:13.780 I have no idea.
00:09:15.500 All right.
00:09:17.360 So that's what you missed.
00:09:20.920 Let's see.
00:09:21.560 So as you know,
00:09:23.940 tonight DeSantis announces
00:09:26.640 and Trump pounces.
00:09:31.120 Yeah.
00:09:32.080 All right.
00:09:32.480 You can savor that
00:09:33.380 for a minute.
00:09:34.800 DeSantis announces
00:09:35.820 and Trump pounces.
00:09:36.940 We have both stories.
00:09:38.020 So DeSantis is going to go
00:09:39.220 on the audio service
00:09:41.220 on Twitter
00:09:41.860 called Spaces
00:09:43.160 and is going to do
00:09:44.980 an unscripted interview,
00:09:47.140 which I suppose
00:09:48.000 is the only kind
00:09:48.940 you should do,
00:09:49.800 an unscripted interview,
00:09:51.820 with Elon Musk.
00:09:53.900 Do you think
00:09:54.620 Elon Musk
00:09:55.220 is going to get
00:09:55.760 any pushback
00:09:57.260 for having DeSantis on?
00:10:00.560 Oh, of course,
00:10:01.840 because it's Elon Musk
00:10:03.000 and it's politics
00:10:03.900 and it's DeSantis
00:10:04.760 and all that.
00:10:05.940 So we must find
00:10:07.000 reasons to hate it.
00:10:08.700 Reason number one
00:10:09.580 to hate it,
00:10:10.260 Twitter has become
00:10:11.780 a right-wing echo chamber.
00:10:15.080 Right?
00:10:16.500 Except that Musk has
00:10:18.300 on Twitter
00:10:19.420 said that he'd love
00:10:20.900 to interview Biden
00:10:21.920 as well.
00:10:23.720 So there's your
00:10:25.100 right-wing echo chamber.
00:10:27.340 The guy who's being blamed
00:10:29.060 for being biased.
00:10:31.000 Literally open to
00:10:32.300 any of the major candidates
00:10:33.520 talking to him,
00:10:34.300 I'm sure.
00:10:34.920 Now, he didn't say
00:10:35.500 anything about Trump.
00:10:36.980 But would he say no?
00:10:38.740 I don't know.
00:10:39.280 It's a good question.
00:10:41.080 You might.
00:10:41.640 You might, actually.
00:10:42.820 Because there are
00:10:43.260 competitors on truth
00:10:45.300 versus Twitter.
00:10:47.580 But we'll see.
00:10:49.100 However, I think
00:10:50.040 I love everything about it.
00:10:53.020 I think DeSantis is smart
00:10:54.580 to do it this way
00:10:56.380 because it makes news.
00:11:00.420 So DeSantis gets
00:11:02.080 to make news twice.
00:11:03.960 Once because he's announcing
00:11:05.440 and twice because he's doing it
00:11:07.940 in a way that is newsworthy.
00:11:11.420 That's good technique.
00:11:14.020 I'm going to give DeSantis
00:11:15.360 some compliments.
00:11:17.840 He does consistently find
00:11:20.440 the free money.
00:11:22.240 Right?
00:11:22.680 The little things
00:11:23.960 that his base likes.
00:11:26.280 And this is just
00:11:27.600 one of those little extra...
00:11:30.280 There's just a little extra
00:11:31.440 for this.
00:11:32.560 Right?
00:11:32.800 Anybody can announce
00:11:33.820 for presidency.
00:11:35.160 Several people
00:11:35.760 have done it already.
00:11:37.000 And it's usually boring.
00:11:39.320 I don't think
00:11:40.120 there's anything
00:11:40.560 less boring
00:11:41.400 than having
00:11:42.760 an unscripted conversation
00:11:44.480 with Elon Musk
00:11:45.520 where he gets
00:11:46.580 to ask the questions.
00:11:48.380 What could be
00:11:49.620 less boring than that?
00:11:52.200 That's pretty good.
00:11:53.160 So DeSantis,
00:11:54.640 A plus for
00:11:56.000 announcement technique.
00:11:59.140 However,
00:12:00.580 when DeSantis announces,
00:12:02.660 Trump pounces.
00:12:03.460 And so he had
00:12:04.860 a little screed
00:12:06.620 today about it
00:12:07.520 in which he called
00:12:08.520 Ron DeSanctimonious.
00:12:10.880 Now he's shortened it
00:12:11.800 to Ron DeSantis.
00:12:14.280 Ron DeSantis.
00:12:17.480 Now,
00:12:18.400 I cannot hide
00:12:20.420 the fact
00:12:21.140 that Trump's technique
00:12:23.400 makes me giggle.
00:12:25.580 And he's done
00:12:26.640 this before, right?
00:12:27.700 He's announced
00:12:28.520 a nickname,
00:12:29.820 but then he's
00:12:30.720 later shortened
00:12:31.440 the nickname.
00:12:32.820 He's abbreviated it.
00:12:33.900 Then he gets another
00:12:34.580 hit for the abbreviation.
00:12:38.200 So now I guess
00:12:39.020 he's abbreviating it
00:12:39.980 to DeSantis.
00:12:41.380 And these are the claims
00:12:42.900 that Trump makes.
00:12:44.560 Now,
00:12:44.780 these are political claims.
00:12:47.620 So,
00:12:48.160 you know,
00:12:48.400 use your judgment
00:12:49.140 about the truth
00:12:50.900 of any of this.
00:12:51.880 Right?
00:12:52.020 It's all out of context stuff.
00:12:54.000 So,
00:12:54.600 you know,
00:12:55.180 I'm not claiming
00:12:56.000 any of this is true
00:12:57.220 if it were to be
00:12:59.020 considered in context.
00:13:00.100 So,
00:13:01.440 he says that
00:13:02.060 DeSantis voted
00:13:02.900 to cut Social Security
00:13:04.100 and degrade Medicare
00:13:06.060 and he wanted
00:13:07.160 to introduce
00:13:07.720 this 23%
00:13:09.120 sales tax increase
00:13:10.520 and these are,
00:13:11.480 he's a rhino
00:13:12.280 who Paul Ryan likes
00:13:14.080 and he's a disloyal person.
00:13:17.480 And so,
00:13:18.480 so Trump is basically
00:13:20.120 just emptying the,
00:13:21.520 you know,
00:13:21.840 emptying the clip.
00:13:23.180 He said,
00:13:23.780 what do we got?
00:13:25.040 Bring me the entire list.
00:13:27.340 I'm going to do,
00:13:28.040 I'm going to do
00:13:28.440 one announcement.
00:13:29.340 I'll just throw
00:13:29.860 everything in there
00:13:30.580 and see what sticks.
00:13:32.440 But my favorite was,
00:13:34.620 Trump said
00:13:35.280 about DeSantis,
00:13:36.900 he desperately needs
00:13:38.060 a personality transplant
00:13:39.400 and,
00:13:40.540 to the best of my knowledge,
00:13:41.920 they are not medically
00:13:42.820 available yet.
00:13:46.920 Now,
00:13:47.400 am I wrong
00:13:50.240 that Trump
00:13:52.120 is one of the best
00:13:52.840 humor writers
00:13:53.860 in our age?
00:13:56.660 It's just the way
00:13:57.600 he chooses his words
00:13:58.920 because
00:13:59.960 it would be one thing
00:14:01.260 to say he needs
00:14:01.940 a personality transplant,
00:14:04.620 right?
00:14:04.960 If you say somebody
00:14:05.940 needs a personality transplant,
00:14:08.180 that would be
00:14:08.880 sort of innovative
00:14:09.960 and might get
00:14:11.360 a little news,
00:14:12.300 right?
00:14:13.260 But most people
00:14:14.280 would stop there.
00:14:16.060 Oh,
00:14:16.320 he needs a,
00:14:17.000 he needs a personality
00:14:18.100 transplant.
00:14:19.620 But what does Trump
00:14:20.940 consistently do?
00:14:23.140 What technique
00:14:24.020 does Trump use?
00:14:26.040 Say it.
00:14:28.220 Say it.
00:14:29.600 He gets attention,
00:14:30.480 of course.
00:14:31.740 No,
00:14:32.160 there's more.
00:14:33.300 It's the most obvious
00:14:34.140 thing he does.
00:14:35.720 Say it.
00:14:37.500 He makes you think
00:14:38.280 past the sale.
00:14:40.840 Right?
00:14:41.220 Here he did it again.
00:14:42.020 The sale
00:14:43.080 is that,
00:14:43.820 that DeSantis
00:14:45.820 needs a personality
00:14:47.780 transplant.
00:14:49.060 So that's what
00:14:49.740 he's trying to sell you,
00:14:50.860 that he has a
00:14:51.660 boring personality.
00:14:53.620 Now,
00:14:54.300 can you imagine
00:14:55.520 any other candidate
00:14:57.700 focusing on
00:15:00.240 somebody's boringness
00:15:01.680 as a political attack?
00:15:04.940 Because
00:15:05.560 if you saw this
00:15:06.720 out of context,
00:15:07.520 you'd say to yourself,
00:15:08.680 perhaps,
00:15:09.180 and I think
00:15:10.420 even Musk
00:15:11.980 said something
00:15:12.640 like this,
00:15:13.920 that you'd like
00:15:15.180 a boring president
00:15:15.960 for a while.
00:15:17.440 You know,
00:15:17.820 a boring president
00:15:18.640 might be
00:15:19.360 exactly what we need.
00:15:21.520 How about a president
00:15:22.200 with no personality
00:15:23.220 whatsoever?
00:15:24.780 I could go for that
00:15:26.020 right now.
00:15:26.860 Right?
00:15:27.640 So there are a lot
00:15:28.440 of people who would say,
00:15:29.340 well,
00:15:29.460 that's not even
00:15:30.000 an insult.
00:15:32.620 Like,
00:15:32.860 why would you focus
00:15:33.700 on his personality
00:15:34.760 when it's the least
00:15:36.460 important part
00:15:37.180 of the process?
00:15:38.320 And the answer is
00:15:39.340 because it works.
00:15:40.920 That's it.
00:15:42.160 Trump knows,
00:15:43.320 what other politicians
00:15:44.200 don't know,
00:15:45.520 that people do vote
00:15:46.760 based on what they think
00:15:47.980 will be more fun.
00:15:49.720 I know I do.
00:15:51.940 I am absolutely
00:15:53.400 conscious of the fact,
00:15:55.320 completely conscious,
00:15:56.740 of the fact that
00:15:57.760 I'm biased by
00:15:58.540 what would be more fun.
00:16:00.120 Or funnier.
00:16:01.360 Or just more interesting.
00:16:02.920 And he knows it.
00:16:04.220 He knows that
00:16:04.880 if he's more fun,
00:16:05.940 people are going
00:16:07.080 to vote for him.
00:16:09.420 I'm sure that
00:16:10.180 helped Zelensky.
00:16:11.560 Do you think
00:16:11.980 Zelensky won
00:16:12.840 because he was
00:16:13.520 more fun?
00:16:14.460 Probably.
00:16:15.800 Probably that
00:16:16.580 and nothing else.
00:16:17.820 Probably Zelensky
00:16:18.660 only won
00:16:19.380 because he was
00:16:19.940 more fun.
00:16:21.160 It doesn't seem
00:16:21.720 like it at the moment,
00:16:22.740 but I imagine
00:16:23.820 they thought so.
00:16:25.520 So,
00:16:26.240 anyway,
00:16:28.360 and then the claims
00:16:30.880 he makes
00:16:31.400 are all
00:16:32.080 in the context.
00:16:33.480 For example,
00:16:34.300 the sales tax
00:16:35.300 increased
00:16:35.820 to 23%.
00:16:36.980 If you hear that
00:16:38.360 in a context,
00:16:40.220 doesn't it sound
00:16:40.820 like Ron DeSantis
00:16:41.680 wants to raise
00:16:42.380 your taxes?
00:16:43.780 Because at one time
00:16:44.620 he said 23%
00:16:45.820 sales tax.
00:16:47.220 No.
00:16:48.360 Now,
00:16:48.720 I don't have to do
00:16:49.500 any research,
00:16:50.860 I've done no research
00:16:52.020 on this,
00:16:52.920 to know
00:16:53.500 that that was
00:16:54.760 in the context
00:16:55.500 of lowering
00:16:56.060 your other taxes.
00:16:57.880 Did I guess right?
00:16:59.620 I'm just guessing.
00:17:01.120 But I'm guessing
00:17:02.020 that Ron DeSantis
00:17:02.880 never suggested
00:17:04.060 keeping all
00:17:05.280 your other taxes
00:17:06.060 the same
00:17:06.700 and raising
00:17:07.700 your sales tax
00:17:08.600 to 23%.
00:17:09.780 You know
00:17:10.840 that never happened,
00:17:11.720 right?
00:17:12.580 You don't have
00:17:13.060 to research that?
00:17:15.000 Of course
00:17:15.720 it never happened.
00:17:16.840 Yeah.
00:17:17.220 He was probably
00:17:17.980 in the context
00:17:18.740 of a total
00:17:22.100 tax overhaul
00:17:23.500 that would result
00:17:24.820 in lower taxes
00:17:25.700 or something
00:17:26.260 more efficient.
00:17:27.440 And I'm not saying
00:17:28.120 it was a good idea
00:17:28.960 or a bad idea.
00:17:29.760 I'm just saying
00:17:31.320 it wasn't this.
00:17:32.520 It wasn't just
00:17:33.200 keeping everything
00:17:33.820 the same
00:17:34.320 and raising
00:17:34.920 your sales tax.
00:17:36.900 So,
00:17:37.400 you know,
00:17:37.600 it's a very
00:17:38.040 political,
00:17:39.100 Trump-like
00:17:39.700 set of
00:17:41.680 complaints.
00:17:47.460 Right.
00:17:48.300 So,
00:17:48.800 but I will give
00:17:49.840 Trump credit
00:17:50.660 for one thing
00:17:51.900 in particular.
00:17:53.260 Can you do
00:17:54.480 a fact check
00:17:55.140 on me here?
00:17:56.240 I'm not sure
00:17:56.800 I'm going to pass
00:17:57.380 the fact check
00:17:57.960 on this.
00:17:58.320 But my understanding
00:17:59.760 is,
00:18:00.300 just based on memory,
00:18:02.360 that Trump
00:18:02.900 has been pretty
00:18:03.820 consistent about
00:18:04.740 not cutting
00:18:05.600 benefits for
00:18:06.840 seniors,
00:18:08.720 especially,
00:18:09.480 you know,
00:18:09.740 Medicare and
00:18:10.240 Social Security.
00:18:11.500 Am I right
00:18:11.980 about that?
00:18:13.020 I believe he's
00:18:13.960 been completely
00:18:14.760 consistent about
00:18:16.160 backing seniors.
00:18:19.080 Yeah.
00:18:19.780 And so that's
00:18:20.500 a strong attack.
00:18:21.760 Because if
00:18:22.620 DeSantis has ever
00:18:23.660 wavered on that
00:18:24.580 and thought,
00:18:25.340 oh,
00:18:25.460 we need a
00:18:26.020 grand deal
00:18:27.380 to balance
00:18:27.960 the budget,
00:18:28.580 which is not
00:18:29.080 a bad idea.
00:18:30.760 You know,
00:18:30.920 I'm not,
00:18:31.340 I wouldn't
00:18:31.820 criticize it.
00:18:32.880 If somebody
00:18:33.440 came up with
00:18:33.940 an idea that
00:18:34.620 did maybe
00:18:35.720 shave off a
00:18:36.560 little bit
00:18:36.900 from Social
00:18:37.420 Security and
00:18:38.360 Medicare,
00:18:39.380 but had the
00:18:40.860 benefit of
00:18:41.360 saving the
00:18:41.860 country because,
00:18:42.960 you know,
00:18:43.260 we get out of
00:18:43.760 our debt spiral,
00:18:45.180 that's something
00:18:46.340 you'd want to
00:18:46.840 talk about.
00:18:48.000 But if you
00:18:48.440 see that in
00:18:48.880 the context,
00:18:49.500 it just sounds
00:18:49.960 like a big
00:18:51.100 old,
00:18:51.620 you know,
00:18:52.680 tax-raising,
00:18:53.820 benefit-cutting
00:18:55.200 guy.
00:18:56.460 All right,
00:18:56.820 so I don't
00:18:57.160 know if this
00:18:57.540 attack made
00:18:58.060 any difference,
00:18:58.940 but I love
00:18:59.580 the fact that
00:19:00.180 he mentioned
00:19:01.400 the personality
00:19:02.080 transplant.
00:19:03.160 And here's the
00:19:03.640 part where he
00:19:03.960 makes you think
00:19:04.420 past the sale.
00:19:06.020 To the best of
00:19:06.740 my knowledge,
00:19:07.280 they are not
00:19:07.680 medically available
00:19:08.500 yet.
00:19:09.280 It actually
00:19:09.880 makes you think
00:19:10.560 about whether
00:19:11.000 it's possible,
00:19:11.960 which is the
00:19:14.040 hilarious part.
00:19:15.300 It's like,
00:19:15.960 wait a minute,
00:19:16.460 he's actually
00:19:16.860 talking about
00:19:17.380 this like maybe
00:19:18.040 it's possible.
00:19:20.080 All right.
00:19:21.400 So Vanity Fair,
00:19:22.640 which used to be
00:19:23.400 a respectable
00:19:24.200 publication,
00:19:25.180 some people
00:19:25.680 say,
00:19:26.640 has devolved
00:19:28.340 into just a
00:19:29.160 ridiculous parody
00:19:31.080 of itself.
00:19:32.900 And they
00:19:34.660 had,
00:19:35.260 so there was
00:19:36.340 an article
00:19:36.760 today that
00:19:38.020 had two
00:19:38.460 headlines in
00:19:40.480 it.
00:19:40.760 One of the
00:19:41.100 headlines was
00:19:41.840 that DeSantis
00:19:43.340 is going to
00:19:44.000 announce on
00:19:44.920 Twitter because
00:19:47.100 quote,
00:19:48.260 David Duke
00:19:48.900 wasn't available.
00:19:51.080 That's right.
00:19:52.360 Vanity Fair
00:19:53.140 actually says
00:19:54.220 in the headline
00:19:55.260 that DeSantis
00:19:56.660 will be
00:19:57.140 announcing his
00:19:57.760 presidency with
00:19:58.680 Elon Musk
00:19:59.500 because David
00:20:01.060 Duke wasn't
00:20:02.060 available.
00:20:03.740 And then they
00:20:04.560 doubled down
00:20:05.240 in the same
00:20:05.720 article later
00:20:06.340 saying,
00:20:08.940 oh no,
00:20:11.500 it was
00:20:11.620 somewhere else.
00:20:12.920 But there was
00:20:13.640 another similar
00:20:14.980 accusation.
00:20:17.560 And,
00:20:17.820 oh,
00:20:19.060 it also said
00:20:19.760 other neo-Nazi
00:20:21.080 sympathizers
00:20:22.000 weren't
00:20:22.480 available.
00:20:24.800 Now,
00:20:25.560 I'm starting
00:20:26.360 to have a
00:20:26.960 whole different
00:20:27.460 feeling about
00:20:28.320 Democrats now,
00:20:30.220 like the
00:20:30.760 writer of
00:20:31.360 this article.
00:20:32.700 I think
00:20:33.500 we'd all
00:20:33.880 agree that
00:20:35.100 at some
00:20:35.700 level in
00:20:36.400 the Democrat
00:20:36.940 power hierarchy,
00:20:39.220 they know
00:20:40.080 they're doing
00:20:40.540 things just
00:20:41.140 for politics.
00:20:42.580 In other
00:20:42.940 words,
00:20:43.180 they don't
00:20:43.560 believe their
00:20:44.040 own messaging,
00:20:44.940 they just
00:20:45.520 know that it
00:20:45.960 works,
00:20:46.460 similar to
00:20:47.060 Trump,
00:20:47.520 right?
00:20:47.740 He doesn't
00:20:48.140 believe his
00:20:48.560 own messaging,
00:20:49.080 but he
00:20:49.500 knows it
00:20:50.160 works.
00:20:54.080 So,
00:20:55.080 here's what
00:20:57.120 I'm starting
00:20:57.520 to feel.
00:20:58.580 When I see
00:20:59.320 people like
00:20:59.860 the writer
00:21:00.280 of this
00:21:00.680 Vanity Fair,
00:21:01.600 I don't
00:21:01.900 know that
00:21:02.240 this writer
00:21:02.780 is part of
00:21:03.360 the Democrat
00:21:04.560 power structure,
00:21:06.000 or is it
00:21:07.100 somebody who
00:21:07.600 has induced
00:21:08.880 mental illness?
00:21:10.800 Because the
00:21:11.620 Hitlerization of
00:21:12.980 the Democrats,
00:21:14.040 where they see
00:21:14.640 Hitler everywhere,
00:21:15.920 because the
00:21:16.300 media has
00:21:16.780 hypnotized them
00:21:17.780 basically,
00:21:18.580 to see
00:21:19.020 Hitler in
00:21:20.020 their closet
00:21:20.540 and under
00:21:20.940 the bed,
00:21:22.060 that to
00:21:23.040 me reads
00:21:23.740 as mental
00:21:24.500 illness.
00:21:25.640 Now,
00:21:25.920 it could be
00:21:26.520 a temporary
00:21:27.100 form of
00:21:27.700 it,
00:21:28.160 something that
00:21:28.840 passes when
00:21:29.540 the news
00:21:29.960 passes to
00:21:30.600 another form,
00:21:31.620 but at the
00:21:32.380 moment,
00:21:33.400 I don't see
00:21:34.300 it as a
00:21:34.700 political opinion.
00:21:35.780 Do you?
00:21:37.200 Do you see
00:21:37.940 that as
00:21:38.320 politics?
00:21:39.280 It doesn't
00:21:39.700 look like that
00:21:40.200 at all.
00:21:40.560 It looks like
00:21:40.960 mental illness
00:21:41.560 to me.
00:21:42.200 And I'm not
00:21:42.560 saying that
00:21:43.100 for a
00:21:44.300 hyperbolic,
00:21:45.040 I'm intentionally
00:21:46.760 trying to
00:21:47.240 not exaggerate
00:21:48.160 here.
00:21:49.060 My actual
00:21:49.920 impression of
00:21:51.360 it is I
00:21:52.260 only see it
00:21:53.020 as mental
00:21:53.480 illness now.
00:21:54.760 Does anybody
00:21:55.140 else have
00:21:55.580 that yet?
00:21:56.740 Are you
00:21:57.200 seeing it
00:21:57.540 that way,
00:21:57.840 or are you
00:21:58.020 still seeing
00:21:58.440 it as
00:21:58.660 politics?
00:22:00.980 Now,
00:22:01.460 I don't
00:22:01.680 know if
00:22:01.960 there's a
00:22:02.300 version of
00:22:02.760 that that
00:22:03.120 works the
00:22:03.520 other way.
00:22:04.820 Do you
00:22:05.120 think that
00:22:05.620 Democrats
00:22:06.180 have a
00:22:07.400 view that
00:22:08.020 there's some
00:22:08.600 stuff that
00:22:09.340 Republicans are
00:22:10.680 doing that's
00:22:11.240 not based on
00:22:11.960 their actual
00:22:12.420 opinions or
00:22:13.100 politics,
00:22:14.040 but rather
00:22:14.760 on some
00:22:15.180 kind of
00:22:15.520 mental
00:22:15.900 illness?
00:22:17.340 They would
00:22:17.760 say that
00:22:18.100 about religion,
00:22:18.860 right?
00:22:19.720 So some
00:22:20.680 Democrats,
00:22:21.740 non-religious
00:22:22.460 Democrats,
00:22:23.120 some of them
00:22:23.540 might say
00:22:24.700 the right
00:22:27.260 is crazy
00:22:27.980 because of
00:22:28.420 their belief
00:22:28.840 in God.
00:22:30.380 But I
00:22:31.980 think we're
00:22:32.420 well beyond
00:22:33.040 the point
00:22:33.560 where somebody's
00:22:35.720 religious belief
00:22:36.660 is considered
00:22:37.480 a mental
00:22:37.960 illness.
00:22:40.000 There's nobody
00:22:40.520 in the medical
00:22:41.080 community who
00:22:41.860 would say
00:22:42.160 that,
00:22:42.840 at least for
00:22:43.460 the standard
00:22:44.280 religions.
00:22:45.460 I think the
00:22:46.220 medical view
00:22:47.000 is that people
00:22:48.220 have different
00:22:48.740 filters on
00:22:49.520 life.
00:22:50.580 And if you
00:22:50.980 pick this
00:22:51.760 particular
00:22:52.220 religious
00:22:52.760 filter,
00:22:53.780 it's more
00:22:54.160 of a
00:22:54.420 lifestyle
00:22:54.920 preference
00:22:56.600 and can be
00:22:57.700 very good
00:22:58.180 for you.
00:22:59.660 Would you
00:23:00.220 compare somebody
00:23:01.200 who believed
00:23:02.320 in, let's
00:23:03.480 say, a
00:23:03.740 specific
00:23:04.200 religion,
00:23:05.840 and let's
00:23:06.440 say you
00:23:06.700 don't believe
00:23:07.100 that's a
00:23:07.480 true religion,
00:23:08.380 that's your
00:23:08.960 opinion,
00:23:09.260 is that mental
00:23:11.560 illness?
00:23:12.020 If somebody
00:23:12.620 picks a
00:23:13.040 religion that
00:23:13.560 gives them
00:23:13.960 a good
00:23:14.600 guideline for
00:23:15.920 living their
00:23:16.600 life in a
00:23:17.480 healthy way,
00:23:20.140 to me,
00:23:20.840 if religion is
00:23:23.140 a mental
00:23:23.800 illness,
00:23:24.800 you're going
00:23:25.540 to have to
00:23:25.900 show me where
00:23:26.420 it's hurting
00:23:26.800 people.
00:23:28.200 You're going
00:23:28.500 to have to
00:23:28.780 show me that
00:23:29.280 the negative
00:23:30.000 is greater
00:23:30.660 than the
00:23:31.440 positive.
00:23:32.460 Because my
00:23:32.980 observation,
00:23:33.620 this is just
00:23:34.120 anecdotal,
00:23:35.580 but my
00:23:35.940 observation is
00:23:36.700 that religious
00:23:37.240 people do
00:23:37.800 better.
00:23:38.980 They have
00:23:39.380 happier lives,
00:23:40.340 less mental
00:23:41.580 illness,
00:23:42.720 more success,
00:23:43.820 more satisfaction,
00:23:45.440 live longer.
00:23:47.160 To me, the
00:23:48.000 benefits of
00:23:48.740 having a
00:23:49.400 religious faith
00:23:50.220 are somewhat
00:23:51.840 unambiguous.
00:23:53.320 It just seems
00:23:53.920 obvious to me.
00:23:55.760 I'm saying that
00:23:56.640 as someone who
00:23:57.160 is not a
00:23:57.900 believer.
00:23:59.140 I think that
00:23:59.640 gives me some
00:24:00.220 credibility,
00:24:00.940 wouldn't you
00:24:01.220 say?
00:24:02.560 Because if I
00:24:03.340 were a
00:24:03.780 believer,
00:24:04.460 and I said,
00:24:04.840 oh yeah,
00:24:05.280 believing is
00:24:05.900 the healthy
00:24:06.260 thing to do,
00:24:07.380 well then you'd
00:24:08.020 have to say,
00:24:08.800 that's confirmation
00:24:10.040 bias.
00:24:10.960 But I'm
00:24:11.360 giving you
00:24:11.700 something that's
00:24:12.220 the opposite
00:24:12.700 of my
00:24:13.080 confirmation.
00:24:14.360 My
00:24:14.640 confirmation is
00:24:15.480 I'm not a
00:24:16.260 believer.
00:24:17.380 I'm not by
00:24:18.160 choice.
00:24:19.800 I'm not a
00:24:20.620 non-believer by
00:24:21.480 choice.
00:24:22.600 It's just
00:24:23.020 where I ended
00:24:23.560 up.
00:24:24.600 It's just
00:24:24.960 where I am.
00:24:25.760 I don't
00:24:26.120 choose it.
00:24:27.500 So if I
00:24:28.220 could choose,
00:24:29.340 I would
00:24:30.040 choose to
00:24:30.480 have a
00:24:30.720 religious
00:24:31.040 faith.
00:24:32.420 That would
00:24:32.780 be my
00:24:33.960 rational choice,
00:24:35.360 if I could
00:24:35.900 choose.
00:24:37.100 But I
00:24:37.420 can't.
00:24:37.960 My brain
00:24:38.740 doesn't have
00:24:39.500 that capacity,
00:24:40.260 I guess.
00:24:41.360 So I'm
00:24:42.400 not sure I'd
00:24:42.860 call that a
00:24:43.280 mental illness,
00:24:44.000 if it's making
00:24:44.640 you healthier and
00:24:45.420 more successful,
00:24:46.420 gives you meaning,
00:24:47.480 and all that
00:24:48.060 stuff.
00:24:49.180 But if you see
00:24:50.220 Hitler under the
00:24:50.960 bed, how is that
00:24:51.580 helping you?
00:24:53.280 It's not.
00:24:54.660 That's just
00:24:55.280 mental illness.
00:24:57.000 So that's going
00:24:57.860 to be my take,
00:24:58.640 I think, for the
00:24:59.920 rest of the
00:25:00.760 cycle, is I'm
00:25:02.200 going to try to
00:25:02.660 make a distinction
00:25:03.340 between what is
00:25:04.180 political attack,
00:25:05.920 such as Trump
00:25:06.940 making, you
00:25:07.700 know, tax and
00:25:08.920 benefit-related
00:25:09.740 claims about
00:25:10.420 DeSantis.
00:25:11.260 That's clearly
00:25:12.180 not mental
00:25:13.040 illness.
00:25:13.720 Would you
00:25:14.100 agree?
00:25:15.360 A politician
00:25:16.360 just claiming
00:25:17.220 the other one
00:25:17.900 has bad
00:25:18.840 policies, even
00:25:19.680 if it's a
00:25:20.140 lie, it's not
00:25:21.380 mental illness.
00:25:22.640 It's just how
00:25:23.560 they play that
00:25:24.080 game.
00:25:26.420 All right.
00:25:28.100 But I think
00:25:29.700 we need a name
00:25:30.420 for this,
00:25:31.080 seeing Hitler
00:25:31.420 everywhere.
00:25:31.900 It's like
00:25:32.920 Hitlerization,
00:25:35.060 or that's
00:25:36.360 not quite it.
00:25:38.300 But something
00:25:38.900 that, yeah,
00:25:39.640 TDS didn't get
00:25:40.540 it done.
00:25:41.660 Trump derangement
00:25:42.460 syndrome is
00:25:43.640 too nonspecific.
00:25:46.940 I'm looking for
00:25:47.720 something that's
00:25:48.280 more specific to
00:25:49.340 the racist
00:25:50.280 narrative.
00:25:54.900 Godwinization,
00:25:55.760 too clever.
00:25:57.780 Hitler haunting,
00:25:58.820 Hitler under the
00:25:59.460 bed.
00:26:00.920 How about
00:26:01.240 Hitler under
00:26:01.800 the bed?
00:26:04.760 Does that
00:26:05.340 work?
00:26:06.960 You got the
00:26:08.000 Hitler under
00:26:08.560 the bed
00:26:09.000 disease?
00:26:10.500 That kind of
00:26:11.200 works.
00:26:11.640 It's very
00:26:11.980 visual, isn't
00:26:12.680 it?
00:26:13.560 It's visual and
00:26:14.500 it's absurd, so
00:26:16.000 it kind of
00:26:16.340 works.
00:26:17.680 Bedtime for
00:26:18.300 Hitler.
00:26:18.880 Too long?
00:26:19.700 Yeah, it is
00:26:20.020 too long.
00:26:21.660 All right.
00:26:23.700 As you know,
00:26:24.740 if you're
00:26:25.080 following the
00:26:25.580 news, there
00:26:26.340 is something
00:26:27.240 like, I'm
00:26:28.280 going to call
00:26:28.620 it a trans
00:26:29.440 backlash.
00:26:30.040 So entities
00:26:32.380 that are
00:26:32.900 pushing back
00:26:33.740 against
00:26:34.180 trans
00:26:35.440 activism,
00:26:37.200 et cetera.
00:26:38.140 So adding to
00:26:39.240 that list is
00:26:39.840 Montana.
00:26:41.100 It's the first
00:26:41.840 state to
00:26:42.480 ban people
00:26:44.280 dressed in
00:26:44.960 drag from
00:26:45.640 reading books
00:26:46.300 to children
00:26:46.880 at public
00:26:47.420 schools and
00:26:48.100 libraries.
00:26:48.500 I don't
00:26:52.640 know.
00:26:53.880 Is that
00:26:54.420 too far?
00:26:59.580 That feels
00:27:00.360 too far.
00:27:04.840 Now, I'm
00:27:05.680 not in
00:27:06.120 favor, just
00:27:07.320 to be clear,
00:27:08.280 I'm not in
00:27:08.960 favor of
00:27:09.880 people reading
00:27:14.040 to children
00:27:14.640 if the
00:27:15.960 reading to
00:27:16.420 children is
00:27:17.160 also coming
00:27:18.600 with a
00:27:19.000 political
00:27:19.360 message.
00:27:21.520 So just
00:27:22.540 to be
00:27:22.820 clear, I'm
00:27:24.220 not really,
00:27:24.960 I'm not
00:27:25.540 crazy about
00:27:26.440 the men
00:27:28.780 dressed, well,
00:27:29.720 how do they
00:27:30.280 say it?
00:27:32.220 They say
00:27:32.920 people dressed
00:27:33.660 in drag.
00:27:34.460 Right, so
00:27:35.000 they don't say
00:27:35.520 it in the
00:27:36.120 impolite way.
00:27:37.360 So they don't
00:27:37.820 say men, they
00:27:38.440 say people
00:27:38.880 dressed in
00:27:39.340 drag.
00:27:39.620 I'm not
00:27:44.300 in favor of
00:27:45.120 people dressed
00:27:45.680 in drag
00:27:46.180 reading to
00:27:46.800 school children.
00:27:48.980 But I
00:27:50.280 don't know if
00:27:50.800 banning it
00:27:51.500 is quite the
00:27:53.440 right approach.
00:27:55.480 I don't have a
00:27:56.060 better idea,
00:27:57.420 just to be
00:27:57.940 clear, I don't
00:27:58.580 have a good
00:27:58.960 idea for this.
00:28:00.200 But I'm not
00:28:01.080 sure that it
00:28:02.780 feels like a
00:28:03.800 little too
00:28:04.240 much.
00:28:05.340 Does anybody
00:28:05.740 have that
00:28:06.120 reaction?
00:28:06.900 Or is it
00:28:07.180 just me?
00:28:08.460 Somebody says
00:28:09.060 jail.
00:28:09.620 No, it's
00:28:12.340 just me, right?
00:28:13.020 I'm the only
00:28:13.380 one having
00:28:13.760 this reaction.
00:28:15.460 Yeah, because
00:28:15.820 there's, we
00:28:18.040 always have to
00:28:18.840 walk this
00:28:19.340 balance between
00:28:21.060 over-regulating
00:28:22.360 everything and
00:28:24.080 protecting
00:28:24.560 children.
00:28:26.560 So if on
00:28:28.020 this one you
00:28:28.560 fell on the
00:28:29.100 side of
00:28:29.460 protecting
00:28:29.840 children, I'd
00:28:30.740 be okay with
00:28:31.200 that.
00:28:31.600 I mean, I
00:28:31.960 wouldn't
00:28:32.240 complain about
00:28:33.060 that instinct.
00:28:34.500 I just feel
00:28:35.340 like it's
00:28:36.520 sort of an
00:28:36.880 expensive way
00:28:37.680 to do it.
00:28:38.160 you know,
00:28:39.860 just over,
00:28:40.960 it's a little
00:28:41.820 over-regulating,
00:28:43.280 but I get it.
00:28:44.880 I get it.
00:28:45.480 I guess I
00:28:45.880 don't, I'm
00:28:46.380 not opposed to
00:28:47.040 it.
00:28:48.020 It just, I
00:28:48.560 wish there
00:28:48.840 was some
00:28:49.120 other way to
00:28:49.820 get the job
00:28:50.860 done.
00:28:51.120 All right, but
00:28:53.700 here I'm useless
00:28:54.460 because I have no
00:28:55.220 good ideas for
00:28:56.180 this.
00:28:56.680 So I'll just
00:28:57.040 point out that
00:28:57.580 there seems to
00:28:58.120 be some kind of
00:28:58.820 a backlash
00:28:59.600 coming.
00:29:01.060 Likewise,
00:29:02.040 Target, I
00:29:03.100 saw a story
00:29:04.300 about Target
00:29:05.320 and the
00:29:05.900 boycott there
00:29:06.680 because apparently
00:29:07.860 Target was
00:29:08.760 selling some
00:29:09.580 trans-related
00:29:11.120 clothing for
00:29:12.460 children, right?
00:29:14.580 Was that the
00:29:15.360 story?
00:29:16.800 It was trans-specific
00:29:18.520 clothing for
00:29:20.000 children.
00:29:20.920 So there was a
00:29:21.760 complaint about
00:29:22.480 that.
00:29:22.980 I saw a tweet
00:29:23.600 about it that
00:29:24.120 pointed to an
00:29:24.660 article in
00:29:25.180 The Hill, but
00:29:26.680 by the time I
00:29:27.300 clicked on it,
00:29:27.840 the article was
00:29:28.460 gone.
00:29:28.780 Is that because
00:29:31.040 something about
00:29:31.560 the story changed?
00:29:32.520 Did The Hill
00:29:34.580 maybe get a
00:29:35.340 fact check
00:29:35.960 wrong?
00:29:38.200 So there's
00:29:38.880 something about
00:29:39.280 the story I
00:29:39.800 don't understand
00:29:40.480 because it kind
00:29:41.620 of came and
00:29:42.120 went and maybe
00:29:44.040 it's because some
00:29:44.580 of the facts
00:29:45.240 were wrong.
00:29:46.840 Anyway, the
00:29:47.620 only part that I
00:29:48.420 think we know
00:29:49.060 is that Target's
00:29:49.840 getting pressure
00:29:50.480 to change
00:29:53.480 their approach.
00:29:55.400 So that is
00:29:56.240 yet another
00:29:56.900 example of,
00:29:59.400 I'll call it a
00:30:00.120 trans-backlash.
00:30:02.520 Now, as you
00:30:03.900 know, I'm
00:30:05.420 pro-LGBTQ,
00:30:07.860 pro-trans for
00:30:09.660 adults.
00:30:10.980 For adults.
00:30:12.460 And the kid
00:30:13.940 issue is, that's
00:30:15.860 a whole other
00:30:16.340 topic.
00:30:17.480 But for adults,
00:30:18.360 I'm, you know,
00:30:18.880 live your life,
00:30:19.840 do what you
00:30:20.200 need to do,
00:30:21.420 et cetera.
00:30:22.980 But I would
00:30:24.060 also say that
00:30:24.740 the trans,
00:30:27.100 let's say,
00:30:27.580 messaging or
00:30:28.620 persuasion was
00:30:30.740 overdone.
00:30:31.300 Is that fair?
00:30:36.040 You know, can I
00:30:37.380 be unambiguously
00:30:38.420 pro-trans because
00:30:39.940 I'm pro-human
00:30:40.720 beings?
00:30:42.020 Pro-human beings,
00:30:43.100 that gets you
00:30:43.760 everything, right?
00:30:45.020 Adults.
00:30:45.780 They're following
00:30:46.380 the law.
00:30:47.220 You follow the
00:30:47.960 law, you're good
00:30:48.520 with me.
00:30:49.580 You know, you
00:30:49.920 stay off my
00:30:50.580 lawn, you're good
00:30:52.240 with me.
00:30:52.720 I don't ask of
00:30:53.680 anything else of
00:30:54.620 you.
00:30:55.320 So, you know, if
00:30:56.180 you could put up
00:30:56.760 with me, I can
00:30:57.400 certainly put up
00:30:58.060 with your
00:30:58.460 differences of
00:30:59.400 whatever.
00:31:02.780 But I think the
00:31:03.680 messaging was
00:31:04.300 overdone.
00:31:05.460 It was just
00:31:05.880 overdone.
00:31:07.220 You know, I
00:31:07.940 think, surprisingly,
00:31:09.580 I think more
00:31:10.040 people were
00:31:10.680 already there.
00:31:12.820 The trans
00:31:13.480 community was
00:31:14.280 weirdly accepted
00:31:15.280 from the start,
00:31:16.300 in my opinion.
00:31:18.700 I mean, haven't
00:31:19.300 you all, and
00:31:20.000 you've encountered
00:31:21.080 trans people
00:31:22.760 probably your
00:31:23.640 whole adult
00:31:24.140 life.
00:31:24.540 did it ever
00:31:25.980 matter to you
00:31:26.760 at all?
00:31:28.240 Like, did they
00:31:29.000 ever hurt you?
00:31:30.520 Have you ever
00:31:30.980 been beaten up
00:31:31.800 by a trans
00:31:32.640 person?
00:31:33.760 Did the trans
00:31:34.580 people raise
00:31:35.620 your taxes?
00:31:36.820 Did they try to
00:31:37.460 take away your
00:31:37.980 rights?
00:31:38.960 I mean, it was
00:31:40.180 sort of a
00:31:40.540 non-problem, but
00:31:42.320 then I think
00:31:43.300 things went
00:31:44.980 maybe a little
00:31:45.620 bit too far.
00:31:47.000 So there's a
00:31:47.620 little bit of
00:31:48.160 adjustment going
00:31:49.120 on.
00:31:50.460 I saw one
00:31:51.580 interesting
00:31:52.860 theory, and
00:31:54.760 it was somebody
00:31:55.600 talking about
00:31:56.480 what they
00:31:56.880 thought James
00:31:57.680 Lindsay's belief
00:31:58.760 was.
00:31:59.300 So there was
00:31:59.660 mind-reading
00:32:00.220 involved.
00:32:01.400 So I don't
00:32:02.100 want to blame
00:32:02.620 James Lindsay
00:32:03.440 for what I'm
00:32:04.340 going to talk
00:32:04.740 about, because
00:32:05.600 it was some
00:32:06.480 other person
00:32:07.220 talking about
00:32:07.960 his opinion.
00:32:09.640 It's just
00:32:10.160 such an
00:32:11.040 interesting idea,
00:32:12.240 I wanted to
00:32:12.900 raise it.
00:32:14.400 So you
00:32:15.220 remember that
00:32:15.780 the summer
00:32:16.460 of George
00:32:16.980 Floyd was
00:32:19.720 a big
00:32:20.140 narrative builder.
00:32:22.100 You know,
00:32:22.260 the country
00:32:23.140 is racist,
00:32:23.900 and all
00:32:24.240 the white
00:32:24.520 people are
00:32:24.900 white supremacists.
00:32:26.880 But that
00:32:27.600 messaging is
00:32:28.560 starting to
00:32:29.160 wear thin.
00:32:31.700 It's starting
00:32:32.380 to not work
00:32:33.020 as well.
00:32:34.440 And so
00:32:34.740 there's some
00:32:35.200 thought that
00:32:36.640 we're heading
00:32:37.640 toward the
00:32:38.140 summer of the
00:32:38.920 trans activism,
00:32:40.660 and we'll
00:32:41.080 make it,
00:32:42.160 that the idea
00:32:42.880 would be to
00:32:44.700 gin up a
00:32:45.440 bunch of
00:32:45.820 trans protests
00:32:46.900 so that it
00:32:48.160 can paint the,
00:32:49.160 especially the
00:32:50.120 conservative,
00:32:51.160 religious part of
00:32:52.160 the Republicans
00:32:53.440 as a bunch
00:32:54.660 of bigots.
00:32:56.160 And that
00:32:56.680 really any
00:32:57.560 kind of public
00:32:58.420 demonstration is
00:32:59.880 not so much
00:33:00.500 about George
00:33:01.120 Floyd, and it's
00:33:02.380 not so much
00:33:02.960 about protecting
00:33:03.680 black citizens.
00:33:05.260 It's really just
00:33:05.940 political.
00:33:07.180 You know,
00:33:07.340 it's a vehicle
00:33:08.540 with which people
00:33:10.040 can wrap their
00:33:10.780 politics around it.
00:33:12.100 So it's never
00:33:12.580 about the thing.
00:33:14.000 Now, I said the
00:33:14.880 same thing about
00:33:15.480 me getting
00:33:16.000 canceled, and I'll
00:33:17.080 say it again.
00:33:17.580 nobody cared
00:33:19.480 what I said.
00:33:21.680 Nobody cared.
00:33:23.160 It's just that
00:33:24.020 there are some
00:33:24.700 stories in the
00:33:25.520 news that you
00:33:26.540 can wrap your
00:33:27.200 existing political
00:33:28.180 beliefs around
00:33:28.940 like a truck.
00:33:30.280 So it's like,
00:33:30.980 oh, there's a
00:33:31.480 truck that's
00:33:32.000 driving through
00:33:32.480 my neighborhood.
00:33:33.580 Oh, let me
00:33:34.140 throw my
00:33:34.520 politics on
00:33:35.140 there.
00:33:36.160 So everybody
00:33:36.980 who saw my
00:33:38.220 story of
00:33:39.340 getting canceled,
00:33:40.520 if they thought
00:33:41.400 that was about
00:33:42.020 me, or it
00:33:43.800 was about
00:33:44.200 anything I said
00:33:45.180 or my
00:33:45.540 opinion, or
00:33:46.640 about how
00:33:47.100 my opinion
00:33:47.660 might change
00:33:48.280 anybody else's
00:33:49.000 mind, it was
00:33:50.300 never about
00:33:50.820 that.
00:33:52.000 And none of
00:33:52.520 these stories
00:33:52.980 are.
00:33:54.080 That's the
00:33:54.700 lowest level of
00:33:55.560 understanding of
00:33:56.460 the news.
00:33:57.700 If that's how
00:33:58.360 you saw the
00:33:58.900 news, that
00:34:00.340 that story was
00:34:01.100 actually about
00:34:01.860 me, then you
00:34:03.380 missed the
00:34:03.700 whole story.
00:34:05.200 There were no
00:34:05.840 Republicans who
00:34:06.620 canceled me.
00:34:07.980 None.
00:34:08.960 It was just
00:34:09.720 Democrats.
00:34:10.640 So the Democrats
00:34:11.300 found a truck.
00:34:12.560 Oh, here's one
00:34:13.220 of those trucks
00:34:13.780 going by.
00:34:14.360 I'll throw my
00:34:15.400 politics in it
00:34:16.200 and I'll get a
00:34:17.140 little ride, a
00:34:17.940 little free ride.
00:34:19.440 So that's all
00:34:20.140 that's happening.
00:34:21.060 So the trans
00:34:22.100 activism, I
00:34:23.160 think, is
00:34:23.940 starting to fit
00:34:25.140 into that
00:34:25.580 model that
00:34:27.480 the Democrats
00:34:29.200 don't really care
00:34:30.200 about any
00:34:30.660 specific trans
00:34:32.000 issue.
00:34:32.760 They just know
00:34:33.460 they can throw
00:34:33.940 their politics
00:34:34.520 into it and
00:34:35.200 it hurts
00:34:35.720 Republicans, so
00:34:37.000 that works.
00:34:41.340 All right.
00:34:41.680 And if you
00:34:44.800 stay till the
00:34:45.340 end, I
00:34:45.840 promise you
00:34:46.400 I'll do
00:34:46.720 something that
00:34:47.340 will make
00:34:48.600 my risk of
00:34:49.320 getting extra
00:34:50.940 super canceled
00:34:52.040 much higher.
00:34:54.520 So if you're
00:34:55.540 thinking of
00:34:56.140 bailing in early
00:34:56.940 before I risk
00:34:59.380 my entire
00:35:00.000 career or
00:35:00.980 what's left
00:35:01.700 of it, the
00:35:02.780 shards of
00:35:04.020 what's left
00:35:04.420 of my career,
00:35:05.460 you're going
00:35:06.200 to want to
00:35:06.540 see that.
00:35:07.060 Hillary says
00:35:13.220 if Trump
00:35:14.140 gets re-elected
00:35:15.020 it's the
00:35:15.340 end of
00:35:15.640 democracy.
00:35:19.060 Is she
00:35:19.780 calling for
00:35:20.320 his assassination?
00:35:22.020 I say yes.
00:35:24.080 I say yes.
00:35:25.880 I say if you
00:35:26.820 are as
00:35:27.760 prominent as
00:35:28.500 Hillary Clinton.
00:35:29.400 Now this would
00:35:29.820 be different if
00:35:30.440 you were just
00:35:30.820 a citizen.
00:35:31.960 If you're a
00:35:32.460 citizen and you
00:35:33.100 say something
00:35:33.540 crazy, people
00:35:34.280 just say,
00:35:34.780 eh, your
00:35:35.800 opinion.
00:35:36.080 But when
00:35:36.960 Hillary Clinton
00:35:37.640 says that
00:35:39.440 electing Trump
00:35:40.580 would be the
00:35:41.200 end of
00:35:41.600 democracy, and
00:35:42.960 then of course
00:35:43.620 they'll use the
00:35:44.440 January 6th
00:35:45.720 insurrection hoax
00:35:46.660 to be the
00:35:47.140 evidence of
00:35:47.740 that, this
00:35:49.460 is definitely
00:35:50.100 a call to
00:35:52.440 assassinate him.
00:35:54.720 Or at the
00:35:55.580 very least, to
00:35:56.720 do whatever it
00:35:57.620 takes to keep
00:35:58.560 him out of
00:35:58.960 office.
00:36:01.500 I don't even
00:36:02.320 know how that's
00:36:02.820 legal.
00:36:03.360 I guess it
00:36:06.180 is, because
00:36:07.220 it's free
00:36:07.680 speech, blah
00:36:08.400 blah, but
00:36:09.400 it feels like
00:36:10.580 that should be
00:36:11.300 the most
00:36:11.880 illegal thing
00:36:12.800 that could
00:36:13.400 happen in
00:36:13.880 the country.
00:36:14.640 It should be
00:36:15.180 more illegal
00:36:15.800 than murder.
00:36:18.340 Because when
00:36:19.020 you murder, you
00:36:19.760 kill one
00:36:20.180 person, which
00:36:21.760 is plenty bad,
00:36:22.800 and you should
00:36:23.160 be punished for
00:36:23.760 that.
00:36:24.800 But if you
00:36:26.300 call for the
00:36:26.860 assassination of a
00:36:27.880 president indirectly,
00:36:29.000 you're calling
00:36:32.120 for something
00:36:32.580 that would
00:36:32.960 destroy the
00:36:33.600 country, at
00:36:34.540 least for a
00:36:34.960 while.
00:36:36.260 The level of
00:36:37.680 evil in this
00:36:39.820 just casual
00:36:40.580 statement, oh,
00:36:41.500 it's the end of
00:36:42.040 democracy if
00:36:42.800 Trump is
00:36:43.200 elected.
00:36:44.320 Now, here's
00:36:46.300 what a
00:36:46.860 reasonable person
00:36:47.600 who cared about
00:36:48.260 the country
00:36:48.720 would say.
00:36:50.020 He'll not be
00:36:51.680 good for the
00:36:52.140 economy.
00:36:53.500 You know,
00:36:53.960 debatable.
00:36:55.300 He won't be
00:36:57.120 good for
00:36:57.460 international
00:36:57.960 relations.
00:36:59.500 Debatable.
00:37:00.680 Debatable.
00:37:01.760 He only cares
00:37:03.340 about himself.
00:37:05.180 Debatable.
00:37:06.780 You know, I
00:37:07.260 would argue
00:37:07.780 that his
00:37:08.160 self-interest
00:37:08.780 in the
00:37:09.100 countries are
00:37:10.220 too closely
00:37:11.320 aligned that
00:37:13.260 it would be
00:37:13.600 hard for him
00:37:14.060 to get out
00:37:14.880 of that box.
00:37:17.140 But when
00:37:17.840 you say that
00:37:18.660 it's the end
00:37:19.460 of democracy,
00:37:20.980 you're really
00:37:22.600 calling for
00:37:23.140 somebody to
00:37:23.640 kill him.
00:37:24.840 Because the
00:37:25.560 end of
00:37:25.820 democracy is
00:37:26.960 a line where
00:37:28.140 nobody can
00:37:28.840 survive.
00:37:30.580 Nobody's
00:37:31.060 going to be
00:37:31.340 okay with
00:37:31.820 that.
00:37:32.720 We would
00:37:33.220 die to
00:37:33.920 stop that
00:37:34.360 from happening.
00:37:37.120 This is the
00:37:37.960 most irresponsible
00:37:38.960 thing I've
00:37:39.780 ever seen a
00:37:40.380 leader do.
00:37:41.580 No exceptions.
00:37:45.320 That's a big
00:37:46.060 statement.
00:37:47.100 Think of all
00:37:47.600 the bad things
00:37:48.240 leaders have
00:37:48.820 done.
00:37:49.080 But I'll just
00:37:49.480 say the
00:37:49.740 United States
00:37:50.400 because we
00:37:50.800 don't have a
00:37:51.640 Hitler in the
00:37:52.180 United States
00:37:52.620 yet.
00:37:52.860 can you
00:37:58.340 think of
00:37:58.660 anything that
00:37:59.140 would be
00:37:59.380 less or
00:38:01.560 anything that
00:38:01.960 would be
00:38:02.200 more
00:38:02.520 irresponsible
00:38:03.380 than saying
00:38:04.980 that somebody
00:38:05.580 who might be
00:38:06.200 the next
00:38:06.580 president will
00:38:07.880 destroy democracy?
00:38:09.860 Knowing that
00:38:10.600 people will
00:38:11.080 believe that.
00:38:12.740 That's just
00:38:13.320 about the
00:38:13.880 most unethical,
00:38:16.200 dangerous,
00:38:17.240 irresponsible thing
00:38:18.400 that any
00:38:18.960 American leader
00:38:19.700 has ever
00:38:20.260 said at
00:38:21.460 any time
00:38:22.080 and in
00:38:22.480 any context.
00:38:24.480 Am I wrong
00:38:25.000 about that?
00:38:26.580 I'm making a
00:38:27.480 very extreme
00:38:28.060 statement but I
00:38:28.780 don't think it's
00:38:29.220 hyperbole.
00:38:30.320 I don't think
00:38:30.860 there's any
00:38:31.520 public statement
00:38:32.420 by any
00:38:33.100 leader that's
00:38:34.240 ever been
00:38:34.620 more dangerous,
00:38:36.380 more irresponsible
00:38:37.280 than calling
00:38:38.340 the next
00:38:39.060 probable, I
00:38:40.180 think he's a
00:38:40.640 probable next
00:38:41.400 president, the
00:38:42.980 end of
00:38:43.320 democracy.
00:38:46.160 That's just,
00:38:48.320 I don't even
00:38:48.780 know what to
00:38:49.080 say about
00:38:49.520 that, it's
00:38:49.860 so bad.
00:38:50.860 Like you
00:38:51.280 actually lose
00:38:52.140 the ability
00:38:52.600 to speak
00:38:53.180 about it,
00:38:53.940 that's what
00:38:54.340 was happening
00:38:54.840 just now.
00:38:55.920 I was trying
00:38:56.540 to find the
00:38:57.020 right words but
00:38:58.720 it's so
00:38:59.080 enormously bad,
00:39:00.640 it's just
00:39:01.000 enormously bad
00:39:02.120 that I
00:39:03.140 couldn't even
00:39:03.740 characterize it.
00:39:05.400 It's outside
00:39:06.080 my imagination,
00:39:07.500 that's the
00:39:08.360 problem.
00:39:09.120 If something
00:39:09.580 happens within
00:39:10.300 your imagination
00:39:11.180 then you
00:39:12.580 probably already
00:39:13.140 have words for
00:39:13.900 it because it's
00:39:14.460 something that
00:39:15.020 you've considered
00:39:15.660 but this is
00:39:16.720 outside my
00:39:17.420 imagination.
00:39:18.020 that somebody
00:39:21.100 at that level
00:39:21.960 would call,
00:39:22.960 essentially call
00:39:23.740 for assassination
00:39:24.500 indirectly.
00:39:27.620 All right,
00:39:28.280 and I'm the
00:39:28.880 only one
00:39:29.160 talking about
00:39:29.660 it.
00:39:32.740 What's up
00:39:33.400 with that?
00:39:34.300 Nobody else
00:39:34.920 thought that was
00:39:36.140 worth mentioning.
00:39:37.960 What was
00:39:38.700 bigger than
00:39:39.140 that?
00:39:40.860 How did that
00:39:41.660 not become the
00:39:42.520 biggest news in
00:39:43.360 the country?
00:39:43.760 But it
00:39:45.460 won't be.
00:39:46.380 It won't
00:39:46.700 be.
00:39:48.580 All right,
00:39:49.000 it looks like
00:39:49.400 the Democrats
00:39:50.100 are trying to
00:39:50.700 save TikTok.
00:39:52.400 I saw a
00:39:53.480 tweet that
00:39:54.060 says that
00:39:55.240 TikTok's on
00:39:55.980 track to
00:39:56.980 have all of
00:39:57.420 its US
00:39:58.520 user data
00:39:59.380 hosted by
00:40:00.740 Oracle.
00:40:02.580 That's
00:40:03.100 apparently
00:40:04.340 according to
00:40:04.920 the TikTok
00:40:05.380 CEO.
00:40:06.700 Now,
00:40:07.440 do you
00:40:08.520 understand the
00:40:09.160 play that
00:40:09.940 China's doing
00:40:10.500 here?
00:40:10.720 There are
00:40:12.400 two risks
00:40:13.120 with TikTok.
00:40:14.020 One is they
00:40:14.480 get all your
00:40:14.920 confidential
00:40:15.380 information.
00:40:16.960 But the
00:40:17.340 other is they
00:40:17.980 can make
00:40:18.340 anything go
00:40:18.980 viral.
00:40:19.580 They have
00:40:19.800 a heat
00:40:20.140 button that
00:40:20.780 literally makes
00:40:21.440 something go
00:40:21.980 viral.
00:40:22.600 So they
00:40:23.140 can determine
00:40:23.760 what things
00:40:24.500 you see or
00:40:25.140 don't see,
00:40:26.280 and therefore
00:40:26.720 they can
00:40:27.380 manipulate and
00:40:28.640 hypnotize the
00:40:29.480 American public.
00:40:30.740 For example,
00:40:32.380 China has the
00:40:33.040 ability to push
00:40:33.760 one button and
00:40:35.120 turn more
00:40:36.220 American use
00:40:37.340 trans.
00:40:40.720 True or
00:40:41.180 false?
00:40:42.220 There's
00:40:42.780 literally a
00:40:43.360 button, it's
00:40:44.360 called the
00:40:44.700 heat button,
00:40:45.380 that can make
00:40:45.920 anything trend.
00:40:47.820 If China
00:40:48.840 decides to
00:40:49.500 push the
00:40:49.860 heat button
00:40:50.380 on pro-children
00:40:52.960 transitioning
00:40:53.780 content, it
00:40:55.480 will make
00:40:55.960 more children
00:40:56.580 in the United
00:40:57.040 States become
00:40:58.040 trans.
00:40:59.660 Do you
00:41:00.320 doubt that?
00:41:02.060 Now, I'm
00:41:02.720 not saying all
00:41:03.560 of them, you
00:41:04.120 know, doesn't
00:41:04.520 instantly turn
00:41:05.300 everybody trans,
00:41:06.340 but we do
00:41:07.140 know that
00:41:07.540 persuasion works,
00:41:08.900 we do know
00:41:09.440 peer pressure
00:41:10.080 works,
00:41:10.580 we do know
00:41:12.000 that social
00:41:12.480 media influences
00:41:13.320 people.
00:41:13.920 None of this
00:41:14.420 is controversial.
00:41:16.740 China can
00:41:17.400 actually turn
00:41:18.960 your children
00:41:19.660 trans.
00:41:22.500 I would
00:41:23.260 argue that
00:41:24.080 it's already
00:41:24.580 happening,
00:41:26.620 and that if
00:41:27.260 you could,
00:41:28.160 here's the
00:41:28.640 study I'd
00:41:29.140 like to
00:41:29.460 see.
00:41:30.860 Show me a
00:41:31.500 study of
00:41:32.320 trans kids
00:41:33.720 and then
00:41:34.940 social media
00:41:35.920 usage.
00:41:36.480 If you can
00:41:38.220 show me that
00:41:39.400 there are just
00:41:40.320 as many
00:41:40.740 trans kids
00:41:41.620 who don't
00:41:42.760 watch
00:41:43.120 TikTok
00:41:43.480 as there
00:41:44.940 are who
00:41:45.300 do watch
00:41:45.860 TikTok,
00:41:46.480 I will
00:41:46.820 change my
00:41:47.340 opinion.
00:41:49.060 But I'm
00:41:50.320 100%
00:41:50.980 positive.
00:41:52.560 It could be
00:41:53.020 wrong, I
00:41:53.460 suppose, but
00:41:54.180 I'll give it
00:41:55.240 1% chance I'm
00:41:56.320 wrong.
00:41:56.940 If you looked
00:41:57.580 at the
00:41:57.940 TikTok
00:41:58.300 viewers,
00:41:59.940 you would
00:42:01.060 find that
00:42:01.520 they're more
00:42:02.000 likely to
00:42:02.700 become trans
00:42:03.640 during the
00:42:04.240 time they're
00:42:04.640 watching TikTok.
00:42:06.600 Would anybody
00:42:07.220 take the other
00:42:07.800 side of that
00:42:08.240 map?
00:42:09.760 And do you
00:42:10.360 think that
00:42:10.720 that's completely
00:42:11.500 naturally
00:42:12.140 occurring?
00:42:13.760 Do you
00:42:14.060 think that
00:42:14.420 China's not
00:42:15.080 aware of
00:42:16.240 that impact?
00:42:18.200 Of course
00:42:18.960 they're aware.
00:42:20.780 Do you
00:42:21.140 think they
00:42:21.460 could stop
00:42:21.980 it if they
00:42:22.340 wanted to?
00:42:23.600 Of course
00:42:24.400 they could.
00:42:25.420 Of course
00:42:25.980 they could.
00:42:26.940 Now, here's
00:42:28.320 the problem.
00:42:29.540 We don't
00:42:30.020 know if
00:42:30.420 China has
00:42:30.940 pushed a
00:42:31.400 button to
00:42:32.280 put heat
00:42:33.220 on something,
00:42:34.100 or if they
00:42:34.780 simply created
00:42:35.520 a situation
00:42:36.200 where heat
00:42:37.380 would automatically
00:42:39.160 arise in
00:42:41.220 unproductive
00:42:41.880 places, and
00:42:43.160 then they
00:42:43.420 just let it
00:42:43.940 happen.
00:42:45.100 Because that
00:42:45.740 would be just
00:42:46.280 as destructive,
00:42:47.460 and it would
00:42:47.740 also explain
00:42:48.400 why our
00:42:49.920 version of
00:42:50.480 TikTok is
00:42:51.180 literally illegal
00:42:52.340 in China.
00:42:54.100 Because they
00:42:54.760 know that even
00:42:55.420 if they don't
00:42:55.880 push any
00:42:56.340 buttons, its
00:42:57.600 nature is to
00:42:58.900 surface bad
00:42:59.560 ideas and make
00:43:00.360 them prominent.
00:43:01.540 It could be
00:43:01.860 its nature.
00:43:02.900 That's all they
00:43:03.520 would need, and
00:43:04.120 that would make
00:43:04.520 sense why they
00:43:05.080 just don't
00:43:05.440 even allow
00:43:05.960 it in
00:43:06.340 China.
00:43:07.100 Because if
00:43:07.820 it wasn't
00:43:08.780 bad by its
00:43:09.880 nature, they
00:43:11.600 could always
00:43:12.000 control what
00:43:12.880 trended in
00:43:13.760 China, right?
00:43:16.300 If the only
00:43:17.200 concern that
00:43:17.840 China had was
00:43:18.980 any specific
00:43:19.920 persuasion, they
00:43:21.360 would just turn
00:43:21.860 that off in
00:43:22.740 China.
00:43:24.100 Oh, okay, you're
00:43:25.080 worried that we'll
00:43:25.860 turn Chinese kids
00:43:27.640 trans.
00:43:28.520 All right, we'll
00:43:28.880 just turn that
00:43:29.460 off in China.
00:43:30.660 It would be that
00:43:31.300 easy.
00:43:32.220 They can control
00:43:33.300 what content you
00:43:34.160 see.
00:43:34.380 So, anyway, so
00:43:39.720 the Democrats
00:43:40.240 appear to be
00:43:41.360 buying this
00:43:42.260 diversionary
00:43:43.100 technique where
00:43:44.280 instead of
00:43:44.780 looking at the
00:43:45.360 big risk, which
00:43:46.280 is persuasion,
00:43:47.720 they're trying to
00:43:48.380 divert us to the
00:43:49.240 small risk, which
00:43:50.280 is data security.
00:43:51.820 And if they can
00:43:52.620 get Oracle to
00:43:55.560 allegedly hold the
00:43:57.600 American data,
00:43:58.820 they can make you
00:43:59.940 forget the biggest
00:44:00.980 risk.
00:44:01.440 risk, because
00:44:02.320 they can say,
00:44:02.940 the TikTok
00:44:03.440 thing, we took
00:44:04.100 care of it.
00:44:05.040 Oh, yeah, there
00:44:05.600 was a TikTok
00:44:06.240 risk, but we
00:44:07.000 took care of
00:44:07.540 it.
00:44:07.900 No, you
00:44:08.380 didn't.
00:44:09.120 No, you
00:44:09.600 diverted us from
00:44:10.560 the real risk to
00:44:11.940 the fake risk, the
00:44:13.080 small risk, the
00:44:13.860 data.
00:44:14.680 The Democrats are
00:44:15.540 doing that,
00:44:16.720 presumably because
00:44:17.380 they like TikTok to
00:44:18.780 win elections, and
00:44:20.660 they're willing to
00:44:21.260 turn your kid trans in
00:44:22.500 the process, because
00:44:23.520 that doesn't matter
00:44:24.200 so much.
00:44:28.820 Again, this is one
00:44:29.860 of the most evil
00:44:31.420 and unethical
00:44:33.760 things you'll ever
00:44:34.580 see in your life,
00:44:35.900 the Democrats
00:44:36.600 hiding the fact
00:44:39.200 that the big risk
00:44:39.980 is persuasion.
00:44:41.820 And by the way,
00:44:42.740 the Republicans are
00:44:43.940 just a little bit
00:44:44.760 better.
00:44:46.200 You know, I've
00:44:46.860 prodded some of
00:44:47.720 the Republican
00:44:48.520 people in Congress
00:44:50.320 to mention
00:44:51.560 persuasion when
00:44:52.420 they mention it,
00:44:53.100 and a few of
00:44:53.680 them have.
00:44:55.200 So I know that
00:44:56.200 the Republicans
00:44:56.780 are at least,
00:44:57.460 you know,
00:44:57.740 mentally, they're
00:44:58.840 on board with
00:44:59.420 the fact that
00:44:59.920 there are two
00:45:00.400 risks, but you
00:45:01.640 can't find a
00:45:02.240 Democrat to say
00:45:03.000 it.
00:45:04.280 Find me any
00:45:05.300 example of a
00:45:06.220 Democrat in
00:45:06.960 Congress who
00:45:08.180 mentioned the
00:45:09.040 risk of
00:45:09.700 persuasion as
00:45:11.600 opposed to the
00:45:12.200 risk of data
00:45:12.840 security.
00:45:14.360 You'll find
00:45:15.040 Republicans who
00:45:15.900 have said both.
00:45:17.560 I don't believe
00:45:18.620 you'll find even
00:45:19.220 one Democrat who
00:45:20.780 has done
00:45:21.060 anything but
00:45:21.540 to say it's a
00:45:22.060 data security
00:45:22.660 problem and
00:45:23.320 hey, we'll
00:45:24.040 take care of
00:45:24.500 that, no
00:45:24.820 problem.
00:45:26.160 Yeah.
00:45:27.680 All right.
00:45:28.660 So I think
00:45:29.400 Trump should just
00:45:30.720 ban TikTok if
00:45:32.000 he becomes
00:45:32.440 president.
00:45:33.500 Or DeSantis.
00:45:35.300 Or as we
00:45:35.920 like to call
00:45:36.380 him, DeSantis.
00:45:38.840 All right,
00:45:39.460 even Chuck
00:45:40.060 Todd, this
00:45:40.780 made news,
00:45:41.420 it's funny.
00:45:42.340 Chuck Todd
00:45:42.940 did something
00:45:44.160 that wasn't
00:45:44.660 stupid and
00:45:45.760 it made
00:45:46.060 national news.
00:45:48.400 How would
00:45:49.000 you like to
00:45:49.440 be so
00:45:49.840 incompetent that
00:45:51.400 when you
00:45:51.720 said something
00:45:52.280 that made
00:45:52.680 sense and
00:45:53.180 made national
00:45:53.780 news?
00:45:54.960 That actually
00:45:55.560 happened.
00:45:56.800 Here's what he
00:45:57.340 said.
00:45:58.960 So the
00:45:59.460 NBC host
00:46:00.580 said that
00:46:01.880 basically that
00:46:02.740 the FBI is
00:46:03.700 looking bad
00:46:04.320 because of the
00:46:04.860 Durham report
00:46:05.500 and that
00:46:06.740 trust in the
00:46:07.560 FBI is eroding
00:46:08.480 left and
00:46:09.120 right.
00:46:09.960 And he's
00:46:10.340 saying that
00:46:10.700 even the
00:46:11.060 left doesn't
00:46:11.800 trust the
00:46:12.220 FBI and the
00:46:13.260 Durham report.
00:46:14.920 Blah, blah.
00:46:15.280 And even
00:46:15.640 suggests that
00:46:16.360 maybe you need
00:46:16.800 something like
00:46:17.280 the church
00:46:17.760 committee to
00:46:19.100 revamp the
00:46:19.940 FBI and
00:46:20.640 make it
00:46:20.940 credible again.
00:46:22.940 Now, again,
00:46:24.780 the story is
00:46:25.320 not about the
00:46:25.840 FBI because
00:46:26.860 we've already
00:46:27.300 talked about
00:46:27.820 the FBI to
00:46:28.500 death.
00:46:29.180 The story is
00:46:30.060 that Chuck
00:46:30.680 Todd made
00:46:32.080 national news
00:46:33.140 by saying
00:46:34.100 something reasonable.
00:46:36.400 I mean,
00:46:37.080 that's the
00:46:37.540 story.
00:46:39.060 He just
00:46:39.840 said something
00:46:40.360 reasonable based
00:46:41.300 on the news
00:46:42.000 and things we
00:46:43.140 all agreed to
00:46:43.780 be true.
00:46:44.200 and that
00:46:45.580 was national
00:46:46.560 news.
00:46:47.560 That is so
00:46:48.380 embarrassing that
00:46:50.120 being reasonable
00:46:50.920 makes you a
00:46:52.240 headlife.
00:46:54.960 All right.
00:46:55.680 Speaking of
00:46:56.220 unreasonable.
00:46:58.240 So you know
00:46:59.240 that the left,
00:46:59.940 of course,
00:47:00.280 has tried to
00:47:00.740 demonize Twitter
00:47:01.640 and turn Twitter
00:47:03.120 into a right-wing
00:47:04.200 garbage dump so
00:47:06.100 that nobody
00:47:06.520 believes anything
00:47:07.160 on Twitter.
00:47:08.040 And they'll all
00:47:08.920 go to TikTok
00:47:09.420 for their
00:47:10.120 political opinions,
00:47:11.480 I guess.
00:47:12.580 So here's what
00:47:13.660 the Trump
00:47:15.340 attack dog
00:47:16.140 Stephen Collinson
00:47:17.160 says in an
00:47:17.860 opinion piece
00:47:18.400 on CNN.
00:47:19.640 And by the
00:47:20.060 way, I do
00:47:20.680 read the CNN
00:47:21.620 opinion pieces
00:47:22.460 for the humor,
00:47:24.780 meaning that I
00:47:25.480 laugh because
00:47:26.460 it's so propaganda.
00:47:29.040 I mean, it's not
00:47:29.520 even pretending to
00:47:30.340 be anything like
00:47:31.040 fair.
00:47:33.020 And that always
00:47:33.660 makes me laugh.
00:47:34.820 So Collinson
00:47:36.200 says that DeSantis
00:47:37.280 is trying to
00:47:38.000 out Trump
00:47:38.580 at Trump.
00:47:41.060 What do you
00:47:41.660 think of that
00:47:42.060 approach?
00:47:42.440 I think you're
00:47:43.780 going to see
00:47:44.040 more of it.
00:47:45.640 They're going
00:47:46.120 to say,
00:47:46.840 all right,
00:47:47.200 Trump is the
00:47:48.800 worst thing
00:47:49.580 that we've
00:47:50.520 ever seen
00:47:51.100 in the history
00:47:51.740 of the
00:47:52.000 republic.
00:47:53.560 And here's
00:47:54.560 the surprise.
00:47:55.940 The guy in
00:47:56.480 second place,
00:47:57.460 even worse,
00:47:59.020 even worse,
00:48:00.580 he's out
00:48:00.920 trumping Trump.
00:48:04.300 Yeah, I don't
00:48:06.680 know.
00:48:07.120 It might work
00:48:07.660 with their base
00:48:08.300 because I think
00:48:09.540 they're worried
00:48:10.040 that if DeSantis
00:48:10.880 does get some
00:48:11.840 traction,
00:48:13.100 they're going
00:48:13.500 to end up
00:48:13.920 with a
00:48:14.280 reasonable
00:48:14.720 looking
00:48:15.200 Republican
00:48:15.700 and they
00:48:16.240 don't know
00:48:16.540 what to
00:48:16.780 do with
00:48:17.060 that.
00:48:17.740 So they're
00:48:18.180 going to
00:48:18.320 have to
00:48:18.600 turn DeSantis
00:48:19.340 into a
00:48:21.500 worse version
00:48:22.200 of Trump
00:48:22.660 than Trump
00:48:23.260 because they've
00:48:24.260 learned that
00:48:24.660 the only thing
00:48:25.400 they win on
00:48:26.160 is what?
00:48:27.860 What's the
00:48:28.440 only way that
00:48:29.020 the Democrats
00:48:29.640 win?
00:48:31.540 Fear.
00:48:32.800 Right.
00:48:33.060 They don't
00:48:33.820 win on
00:48:34.140 policies because
00:48:35.680 the majority
00:48:36.880 of the public
00:48:37.420 is not on
00:48:38.720 board with
00:48:39.160 their policies.
00:48:40.800 Policy-wise,
00:48:41.800 I think
00:48:42.100 something like
00:48:42.800 a middle-of-the-road
00:48:44.940 Republican would
00:48:46.220 have the most
00:48:47.220 beneficial policies
00:48:48.860 according to the
00:48:49.880 majority of
00:48:50.380 Americans.
00:48:51.760 So they've
00:48:54.240 got this weird
00:48:55.360 little balance,
00:48:56.180 don't they?
00:48:56.820 They're trying
00:48:57.280 to make Trump
00:48:57.920 look like the
00:48:58.500 craziest person
00:48:59.280 in the world,
00:49:00.260 but then DeSantis
00:49:01.580 comes along and
00:49:02.440 if they take
00:49:02.960 Trump out by
00:49:03.680 saying he's
00:49:04.100 crazy and
00:49:05.380 a threat to
00:49:06.120 the Republic,
00:49:06.880 you get one
00:49:07.860 of the strongest
00:49:08.740 Republican
00:49:11.260 operators of
00:49:12.380 all time.
00:49:14.520 Because although
00:49:15.220 I don't think
00:49:15.940 DeSantis can
00:49:16.720 beat Trump,
00:49:17.400 unless there's
00:49:17.940 some new
00:49:18.480 news that
00:49:19.100 comes out
00:49:19.520 that we
00:49:19.740 don't know
00:49:20.080 about,
00:49:21.000 but head-to-head
00:49:21.640 I don't think
00:49:22.140 he can beat
00:49:22.520 Trump.
00:49:23.520 However,
00:49:24.860 that said,
00:49:26.400 he's
00:49:26.740 unambiguously
00:49:27.660 one of the
00:49:28.500 sharpest,
00:49:29.440 best,
00:49:30.360 most effective
00:49:31.220 Republican
00:49:32.140 leaders in
00:49:34.260 a long time.
00:49:35.820 Would you
00:49:36.200 agree?
00:49:37.740 So what are
00:49:38.400 the Democrats
00:49:38.940 going to do?
00:49:40.100 Do they want
00:49:40.700 them some
00:49:41.160 DeSantis to
00:49:41.960 run against?
00:49:42.900 Because that's
00:49:43.440 not going to
00:49:43.800 work.
00:49:44.760 Do they want
00:49:45.480 Trump to run
00:49:46.080 against?
00:49:46.800 I don't think
00:49:47.520 that's going to
00:49:47.980 work either.
00:49:49.220 I mean,
00:49:49.420 they've got a
00:49:49.760 real balancing
00:49:50.380 act, and I
00:49:51.220 don't even know
00:49:51.680 if the Democrats
00:49:52.540 have decided how
00:49:53.420 to handle it
00:49:53.960 yet.
00:49:54.740 It's like they
00:49:55.220 have two ways
00:49:55.840 to be wrong
00:49:56.520 and no way
00:49:57.500 to be right.
00:49:59.600 Do you see
00:50:00.040 that?
00:50:00.280 They can be
00:50:01.080 wrong in two
00:50:01.780 different ways,
00:50:02.540 but they don't
00:50:02.860 have a way
00:50:03.260 to be right.
00:50:04.900 Because either
00:50:05.520 one of those
00:50:06.060 candidates should
00:50:07.140 be able to
00:50:07.620 take whoever
00:50:08.840 they run
00:50:09.280 against, in
00:50:10.040 my opinion.
00:50:10.620 I think both
00:50:11.220 of them can
00:50:11.640 take anybody.
00:50:14.160 Now,
00:50:14.420 Vivek also
00:50:16.020 makes things
00:50:16.640 interesting.
00:50:17.080 I love the
00:50:18.240 fact that the
00:50:19.260 Republican Party
00:50:20.480 has the most
00:50:21.100 diversity for
00:50:23.400 who's running
00:50:24.300 for president.
00:50:26.840 Who's going to
00:50:27.620 challenge,
00:50:28.100 so far Biden's
00:50:29.380 challengers are
00:50:30.780 a generic
00:50:32.260 white guy
00:50:33.040 and another
00:50:35.440 generic white
00:50:36.120 guy?
00:50:39.580 Who is
00:50:40.860 running against
00:50:42.200 Biden?
00:50:42.920 So,
00:50:43.380 RFK Jr.,
00:50:44.320 generic white
00:50:44.900 guy.
00:50:46.180 Oh,
00:50:46.340 Marianne Williams,
00:50:47.440 a generic
00:50:47.940 white woman.
00:50:49.500 And then
00:50:50.040 Asa,
00:50:50.740 Asa Hutchinson?
00:50:52.340 No,
00:50:53.040 he's running
00:50:53.480 as a Republican.
00:50:55.820 Wasn't there
00:50:56.480 somebody else?
00:50:58.100 Newsom's not
00:50:58.880 really running.
00:51:00.320 Bernie's not
00:51:01.100 running.
00:51:02.280 But,
00:51:02.960 so now you've
00:51:04.680 got, you know,
00:51:05.140 Nikki Haley
00:51:05.700 and you've got
00:51:06.400 Vivek,
00:51:07.020 you've got
00:51:07.400 Tim Scott.
00:51:09.500 So even though
00:51:10.120 Trump, you know,
00:51:11.180 would be the
00:51:11.840 standard bearer
00:51:12.840 probably if he
00:51:13.660 wins the primary,
00:51:15.300 that's a lot of
00:51:16.820 diversity.
00:51:18.320 That's a lot of
00:51:18.960 diversity.
00:51:20.980 Yeah,
00:51:21.240 RFK Jr.
00:51:22.280 is a generic
00:51:23.000 white guy.
00:51:23.460 I mean,
00:51:24.520 he's more
00:51:24.980 interesting than
00:51:25.720 the average
00:51:26.620 generic white guy,
00:51:27.620 but so is
00:51:28.120 Trump.
00:51:36.260 The devs are
00:51:37.100 going to say
00:51:37.380 Tim Scott is
00:51:38.060 a racist.
00:51:38.900 Yeah.
00:51:39.480 Good luck
00:51:40.060 with that.
00:51:40.660 That's probably
00:51:41.020 why they have
00:51:41.440 to turn to
00:51:42.060 the trans
00:51:43.480 issues.
00:51:44.700 The racism
00:51:45.400 thing was
00:51:45.920 sort of
00:51:46.200 wearing out.
00:51:48.660 All right,
00:51:49.240 let's see what
00:51:49.620 else Stephen
00:51:50.320 Collins has
00:51:50.840 said.
00:51:51.920 It says of
00:51:52.740 Twitter,
00:51:53.040 that's because
00:51:54.800 Twitter,
00:51:55.380 which once
00:51:56.000 offered a
00:51:56.540 platform for
00:51:57.700 democratic
00:51:58.300 movements in
00:51:59.080 the Arab
00:51:59.480 Spring,
00:51:59.900 has been
00:52:00.960 transformed by
00:52:01.900 its new
00:52:02.240 owner into
00:52:03.180 a,
00:52:03.560 wait for
00:52:04.720 it,
00:52:05.560 a febrile
00:52:07.140 circus of
00:52:08.640 untamed free
00:52:09.640 speech,
00:52:10.820 conspiracy
00:52:11.280 theories,
00:52:12.640 and unverifiable
00:52:13.640 information.
00:52:14.340 Does that
00:52:16.560 sound like
00:52:17.140 word salad
00:52:18.060 to you?
00:52:19.700 Yeah,
00:52:20.220 word salad.
00:52:21.420 I had to
00:52:21.920 look up
00:52:22.360 febrile.
00:52:24.120 Have you
00:52:24.400 ever heard
00:52:24.700 that word?
00:52:25.400 F-E-B-R-I-L-E.
00:52:28.460 Yeah,
00:52:28.720 it means like
00:52:29.200 a feverish
00:52:30.300 approach to
00:52:32.200 something,
00:52:32.700 like a feverish
00:52:33.640 excitement.
00:52:34.320 So it's a
00:52:36.740 feverish,
00:52:38.140 what is it?
00:52:41.380 It's a
00:52:42.380 feverish
00:52:45.580 circus of
00:52:46.280 untamed free
00:52:47.040 speech.
00:52:47.900 Now let's
00:52:48.540 break down
00:52:49.020 these complaints.
00:52:50.800 Untamed free
00:52:51.820 speech.
00:52:54.180 Untamed free
00:52:55.180 speech?
00:52:56.740 That's a bad
00:52:57.740 thing?
00:52:58.700 I thought
00:52:59.140 untamed free
00:53:00.080 speech is what
00:53:00.760 we like.
00:53:03.140 It's
00:53:03.780 untamed
00:53:04.380 because the
00:53:05.000 Democrats don't
00:53:05.760 control it
00:53:06.300 anymore.
00:53:07.380 The Democrats
00:53:08.220 are actually
00:53:09.060 against untamed
00:53:10.380 free speech.
00:53:12.040 Here it is.
00:53:13.340 It's right here,
00:53:14.040 it's in writing.
00:53:15.200 Opposed to
00:53:15.960 untamed free
00:53:17.140 speech.
00:53:19.720 Wouldn't most
00:53:20.520 of you run
00:53:21.240 toward untamed
00:53:22.360 free speech?
00:53:23.400 I wouldn't run
00:53:24.260 away from it,
00:53:25.040 I'd run toward
00:53:25.640 it.
00:53:26.600 That's why I'm
00:53:27.500 on Twitter.
00:53:28.700 I like the
00:53:29.540 untamed free
00:53:30.200 speech.
00:53:31.940 So what else
00:53:33.080 is bad about
00:53:33.700 besides the
00:53:34.540 untamed free
00:53:35.180 speech?
00:53:36.300 Conspiracy
00:53:36.940 theories and
00:53:37.680 unverifiable
00:53:39.180 information.
00:53:40.760 Well, thank
00:53:41.600 goodness,
00:53:42.940 Stephen
00:53:43.220 Collinson has
00:53:44.140 alerted us
00:53:44.860 that only
00:53:46.060 since Musk
00:53:46.740 took over
00:53:47.920 Twitter,
00:53:48.840 that's when
00:53:49.480 things got
00:53:50.940 bad with
00:53:51.420 conspiracy
00:53:51.980 theories and
00:53:53.180 unverifiable
00:53:54.240 information.
00:53:55.800 You all
00:53:56.520 noticed that,
00:53:57.120 right?
00:53:57.820 It used to be
00:53:58.640 there were no
00:53:59.200 conspiracy theories
00:54:00.260 theories and
00:54:01.460 there was no
00:54:01.940 unverified
00:54:02.540 information.
00:54:03.740 But as soon
00:54:04.340 as Musk took
00:54:06.120 over, I don't
00:54:07.620 know what
00:54:07.920 happened.
00:54:08.960 Suddenly,
00:54:09.980 suddenly there
00:54:10.720 are all these
00:54:11.140 conspiracy theories
00:54:12.340 that were never
00:54:13.500 there before.
00:54:15.060 And unverified
00:54:16.120 information, my
00:54:17.440 God, I didn't
00:54:18.260 even think it
00:54:18.900 existed until
00:54:20.260 Musk took over.
00:54:21.420 Now suddenly,
00:54:22.620 some information
00:54:23.460 is unverified?
00:54:24.600 Are you kidding
00:54:25.280 me?
00:54:25.520 how could we
00:54:26.280 live in this
00:54:26.760 world with
00:54:27.700 unverified
00:54:28.280 information and
00:54:29.040 conspiracy theories
00:54:29.940 and untamed
00:54:30.700 free speech?
00:54:35.680 Wait a minute,
00:54:36.380 I just turned
00:54:36.860 into that meme.
00:54:38.800 Oh my God,
00:54:39.640 I just turned
00:54:40.100 into the meme.
00:54:42.800 It's like that,
00:54:43.640 right?
00:54:44.420 I'm not wrong.
00:54:47.280 Look at that
00:54:47.940 face.
00:54:50.260 That's my
00:54:50.840 impression of the
00:54:51.500 internet meme
00:54:52.040 face.
00:54:54.560 Anyway, it's
00:54:55.300 hilarious.
00:54:57.440 So you better
00:54:58.340 stay away from
00:54:58.980 that febrile
00:54:59.860 circus called
00:55:00.700 Twitter.
00:55:02.080 You don't want
00:55:02.920 to be part of
00:55:03.500 a febrile
00:55:04.920 circus.
00:55:07.060 You know,
00:55:07.640 that's one of
00:55:08.000 the things that
00:55:08.540 my mother taught
00:55:09.740 me when I was
00:55:10.200 young.
00:55:11.680 I was probably
00:55:12.520 only, I don't
00:55:13.260 know, maybe
00:55:13.560 eight, nine
00:55:14.180 years old, and
00:55:14.760 she called me
00:55:15.220 in one day and
00:55:15.740 she said,
00:55:16.500 you should always
00:55:17.980 look both ways
00:55:19.720 before crossing
00:55:21.060 the street.
00:55:22.380 I understood
00:55:22.960 that.
00:55:24.020 She said,
00:55:24.500 be home by
00:55:25.580 five o'clock
00:55:26.220 for dinner
00:55:26.700 because you
00:55:27.660 don't have a
00:55:28.080 smartphone, they
00:55:28.740 haven't been
00:55:29.160 invented yet, and
00:55:30.060 I thought, wow,
00:55:31.000 how does she
00:55:31.340 even know that?
00:55:32.580 But yes, so I'd
00:55:33.700 be home at five.
00:55:34.640 But then she
00:55:35.200 would always throw
00:55:35.820 in, no matter
00:55:36.740 what other
00:55:37.300 advice, she
00:55:38.380 would say,
00:55:39.560 but most
00:55:40.040 importantly, stay
00:55:41.840 away from any
00:55:42.820 febrile circuses.
00:55:45.800 And I would
00:55:46.500 say, you mean
00:55:47.820 the feverish kind
00:55:49.760 of circuses,
00:55:50.380 because I had
00:55:50.760 really good
00:55:51.220 vocabulary then.
00:55:52.080 And my
00:55:53.320 mother would
00:55:53.640 say, exactly.
00:55:55.480 Stay away from
00:55:56.340 the febrile
00:55:57.280 circuses.
00:55:58.640 And I have
00:55:59.320 done that for
00:55:59.860 most of my
00:56:00.380 life, and I
00:56:00.860 think that's
00:56:01.240 paid off.
00:56:04.100 So that's my
00:56:05.040 advice to you
00:56:05.620 too.
00:56:06.440 No febrile
00:56:07.240 circuses.
00:56:09.800 Well, here's a
00:56:10.600 little surprise.
00:56:11.420 The American
00:56:12.120 economy, it
00:56:15.080 keeps surprising
00:56:16.220 on the upside.
00:56:18.120 I think we
00:56:19.160 try to do
00:56:19.640 everything we
00:56:20.320 can to kill
00:56:20.920 the American
00:56:21.440 economy, you
00:56:22.380 know, through
00:56:22.840 our politics
00:56:23.560 and bad
00:56:25.040 opinions and
00:56:25.720 stuff.
00:56:26.380 And it just
00:56:26.820 keeps going.
00:56:28.980 So apparently
00:56:29.600 the services
00:56:30.500 sector is
00:56:31.800 better than
00:56:32.260 it's ever
00:56:32.640 been.
00:56:33.980 So May was
00:56:35.040 like the
00:56:35.520 best it's
00:56:36.020 ever been.
00:56:36.780 Now
00:56:36.980 manufacturing is
00:56:38.040 not great,
00:56:39.500 but the
00:56:39.920 services sector,
00:56:41.120 you know,
00:56:41.320 stuff like
00:56:41.800 vacations and
00:56:42.680 things, there's
00:56:44.180 a lot of
00:56:44.460 pent-up demand,
00:56:45.220 it looks like.
00:56:46.280 So that's
00:56:47.000 good.
00:56:47.460 Now, inflation
00:56:48.120 did come
00:56:48.860 down, and
00:56:51.900 Donald Luskin
00:56:53.500 had a piece
00:56:55.700 on the
00:56:56.000 Wall Street
00:56:56.320 Journal.
00:56:57.620 You should
00:56:58.020 follow Donald
00:56:58.700 Luskin on
00:56:59.560 Twitter as
00:57:00.920 well.
00:57:01.260 Good follow
00:57:01.760 for economics.
00:57:05.180 And he
00:57:05.900 talks about
00:57:06.340 how the Fed
00:57:07.120 is always
00:57:07.500 fighting the
00:57:08.040 last war.
00:57:09.800 So, you
00:57:11.440 know, I
00:57:11.620 won't give
00:57:11.960 you the
00:57:12.300 economic
00:57:12.780 argument here
00:57:13.540 because you're
00:57:14.700 not all
00:57:15.000 going to
00:57:15.200 love it.
00:57:16.040 But the
00:57:16.540 point is
00:57:18.400 that people
00:57:19.240 who work
00:57:19.680 for the
00:57:20.060 Fed and
00:57:21.540 people who
00:57:22.060 are also
00:57:22.560 experts on
00:57:23.420 economics don't
00:57:25.000 have the same
00:57:25.560 opinion of
00:57:26.100 what works and
00:57:26.780 what they
00:57:27.080 should be
00:57:27.360 doing and
00:57:27.780 when.
00:57:29.380 Wouldn't
00:57:29.660 you think
00:57:30.060 that economics
00:57:30.760 would have
00:57:31.120 figured that
00:57:31.600 out?
00:57:32.640 That if you
00:57:33.340 do this,
00:57:34.120 you'll get
00:57:34.540 more inflation,
00:57:36.320 and if you
00:57:36.820 do this,
00:57:37.580 you'll get
00:57:37.980 less inflation?
00:57:39.100 Don't you
00:57:39.460 think that
00:57:39.800 that, the
00:57:41.380 most basic,
00:57:42.440 basic economic
00:57:43.800 thing?
00:57:45.120 You don't
00:57:45.440 think the
00:57:45.840 experts should
00:57:46.400 be agreeing
00:57:46.840 on that
00:57:47.180 stuff?
00:57:48.180 But they
00:57:48.820 don't.
00:57:50.320 They don't.
00:57:52.060 Like, even
00:57:52.760 the Fed seems
00:57:53.560 to be confused
00:57:54.320 about what
00:57:54.860 caused inflation,
00:57:56.320 according to
00:57:56.980 other economists,
00:57:58.660 right?
00:57:59.180 Not according
00:57:59.700 to me, but
00:58:00.240 according to
00:58:00.700 other economists.
00:58:01.680 So, what is
00:58:02.340 up with that?
00:58:04.280 Like, you
00:58:05.900 think that you
00:58:06.700 can distrust
00:58:09.260 experts, and
00:58:10.820 you think you've
00:58:11.440 reached the
00:58:12.140 level of
00:58:13.060 skepticism,
00:58:13.800 skepticism
00:58:14.040 that's
00:58:14.360 appropriate?
00:58:15.300 It's like,
00:58:15.660 oh yeah, I
00:58:16.280 don't trust
00:58:16.800 all the
00:58:17.120 experts.
00:58:17.640 No, I
00:58:18.420 live in the
00:58:18.880 real world.
00:58:19.820 I know
00:58:20.120 experts could
00:58:20.780 be lying for
00:58:21.560 a variety of
00:58:22.140 reasons, or
00:58:22.600 just wrong.
00:58:24.460 But did
00:58:25.040 you think it
00:58:25.600 would go all
00:58:27.140 the way to
00:58:28.840 all the
00:58:29.360 experts in
00:58:29.960 economics in
00:58:31.300 the world?
00:58:32.140 Can't agree
00:58:32.880 on the most
00:58:33.600 basic thing.
00:58:35.420 Will this
00:58:35.940 cause more
00:58:36.480 or less
00:58:36.840 inflation?
00:58:38.740 And so
00:58:40.420 Donald Luskin
00:58:41.120 raises the
00:58:41.860 alarm that
00:58:43.120 because the
00:58:43.940 Fed is
00:58:44.600 fighting the
00:58:45.160 last war.
00:58:46.420 In other
00:58:46.700 words, I
00:58:47.900 think his
00:58:48.260 view, if I'm
00:58:48.940 characterizing
00:58:49.480 right, is
00:58:50.160 that inflation
00:58:50.680 is going to
00:58:51.140 come down on
00:58:51.900 its own.
00:58:53.220 So if the
00:58:53.700 Fed is
00:58:54.220 goosing the
00:58:55.240 reduction of
00:58:55.900 inflation, you
00:58:56.600 can get to
00:58:57.340 disinflation.
00:58:59.520 And you're in
00:59:00.320 real trouble with
00:59:01.520 disinflation.
00:59:02.420 It doesn't
00:59:02.780 sound like
00:59:03.240 trouble, does
00:59:03.880 it?
00:59:04.360 Your prices
00:59:04.920 are coming
00:59:05.380 down.
00:59:06.580 Sounds good,
00:59:07.400 right?
00:59:07.580 What do you do
00:59:09.100 when your prices
00:59:09.660 are dropping?
00:59:10.200 How do you
00:59:12.620 act when
00:59:13.300 prices are
00:59:13.880 dropping?
00:59:15.460 How do you
00:59:15.960 act if you
00:59:16.520 think a car
00:59:17.220 will be less
00:59:18.200 expensive in
00:59:19.160 six months
00:59:19.780 than it is
00:59:20.300 now?
00:59:21.520 Yeah, you
00:59:21.920 stop buying.
00:59:23.020 You just
00:59:23.840 completely stop
00:59:24.760 buying things
00:59:25.500 because it'll
00:59:26.320 be cheaper in
00:59:26.940 six months.
00:59:28.280 If you stop
00:59:29.240 buying things,
00:59:29.860 the economy
00:59:30.320 dies.
00:59:32.140 So this
00:59:33.680 was a real
00:59:34.440 useful context
00:59:35.440 thing, is
00:59:36.740 that the
00:59:37.440 Fed might be
00:59:38.560 doing the
00:59:39.560 exact opposite
00:59:40.580 of what
00:59:41.100 would be
00:59:41.420 good for
00:59:41.780 the economy.
00:59:42.940 And the
00:59:43.240 argument is
00:59:43.960 that the
00:59:44.300 Fed didn't
00:59:44.980 cause inflation
00:59:46.220 and the
00:59:46.740 things they're
00:59:47.160 doing is
00:59:47.640 not going
00:59:47.960 to reduce
00:59:48.380 it much.
00:59:49.660 It's external
00:59:50.540 factors that
00:59:51.340 caused
00:59:51.620 inflation,
00:59:52.840 external factors
00:59:53.780 that will
00:59:54.340 reduce
00:59:54.840 inflation,
00:59:55.700 especially
00:59:56.060 the bonus
00:59:57.360 payments during
00:59:58.720 the pandemic.
00:59:59.800 Once those
01:00:00.300 stopped, it
01:00:00.860 was a big
01:00:01.160 source of
01:00:01.600 inflation that
01:00:02.160 went away.
01:00:03.320 And it
01:00:04.520 could be
01:00:05.060 that the
01:00:06.460 Fed is
01:00:07.180 pushing us
01:00:08.080 in the
01:00:08.340 direction we're
01:00:08.920 already going
01:00:09.400 to go, and
01:00:10.720 then we'll go
01:00:11.540 there too far
01:00:12.180 too fast, and
01:00:13.200 prices will
01:00:13.980 decrease, and
01:00:15.320 then the
01:00:15.540 whole thing
01:00:15.880 fucking falls
01:00:16.440 apart.
01:00:17.980 So, good
01:00:18.580 to know.
01:00:19.640 But it's
01:00:20.040 interesting that
01:00:20.740 experts are
01:00:22.100 completely on
01:00:23.040 opposite ends of
01:00:24.180 what makes
01:00:24.600 sense for
01:00:25.500 the economics.
01:00:28.100 All right.
01:00:30.440 You know
01:00:31.040 those neo-Nazis
01:00:33.280 in Charlottesville
01:00:35.100 who are
01:00:35.620 saying they
01:00:37.060 will not
01:00:37.480 replace us.
01:00:39.180 Now, I
01:00:39.440 think they
01:00:39.680 were talking
01:00:40.020 about not
01:00:41.780 just, it
01:00:42.600 wasn't just
01:00:43.120 anti-Semitic,
01:00:43.980 I think it
01:00:44.260 was about
01:00:44.520 immigration as
01:00:45.300 well, right?
01:00:46.900 And they
01:00:47.260 were concerned
01:00:47.820 that brown
01:00:49.300 people from
01:00:50.080 other countries
01:00:50.760 would be
01:00:51.360 replacing white
01:00:52.800 people in the
01:00:53.340 United States,
01:00:54.000 and apparently
01:00:54.380 it's happened.
01:00:55.500 So we've had
01:00:56.000 some prominent
01:00:56.560 examples where
01:00:57.420 white supremacists,
01:00:59.380 which used to
01:01:00.160 be a job that
01:01:00.800 only white people
01:01:01.640 held,
01:01:03.280 has now
01:01:03.820 largely gone
01:01:04.500 to brown
01:01:05.020 people.
01:01:06.980 So, I
01:01:07.740 mean, you
01:01:07.980 got the
01:01:08.800 head of the
01:01:09.860 Proud Boys,
01:01:12.540 head of the
01:01:13.200 Proud Boys,
01:01:14.180 part Cuban,
01:01:16.140 I guess.
01:01:18.440 And then
01:01:19.200 there was
01:01:19.620 the Indian
01:01:21.500 American who
01:01:22.540 had the
01:01:23.080 Nazi flag and
01:01:24.060 tried to attack
01:01:24.740 the White
01:01:25.440 House recently.
01:01:27.140 That was a
01:01:27.720 job that was
01:01:28.360 totally white
01:01:29.480 people.
01:01:30.060 They used to
01:01:30.460 do that.
01:01:31.480 But now,
01:01:32.180 now Indian
01:01:32.840 Americans
01:01:33.320 getting in
01:01:33.820 on the
01:01:34.080 white supremacist
01:01:34.880 stuff,
01:01:35.940 the replacement
01:01:36.740 is happening.
01:01:38.220 And I think
01:01:39.100 we had some
01:01:39.600 other examples
01:01:41.120 recently,
01:01:41.640 didn't we,
01:01:42.580 of brown
01:01:43.620 white supremacists?
01:01:45.880 Yeah.
01:01:47.020 So I
01:01:48.380 didn't believe
01:01:48.880 them when
01:01:49.160 they said
01:01:49.520 that immigrants
01:01:50.420 were going to
01:01:50.860 be replacing
01:01:51.460 white people,
01:01:52.120 but they are
01:01:52.560 taking the
01:01:53.020 white supremacist
01:01:53.800 jobs.
01:01:54.920 I don't know
01:01:55.380 about the
01:01:55.720 other jobs,
01:01:56.300 but the
01:01:56.520 white supremacists
01:01:57.280 are losing
01:01:57.680 a lot of
01:01:58.140 jobs.
01:01:59.220 And I think
01:02:00.300 somebody should
01:02:00.740 look into that.
01:02:01.300 Well, it
01:02:05.280 turns out that
01:02:05.840 being a
01:02:06.400 critic of
01:02:07.060 Putin is
01:02:07.940 not good
01:02:08.520 for your
01:02:08.900 health.
01:02:10.500 Russia's
01:02:11.000 deputy
01:02:11.340 minister of
01:02:12.120 science and
01:02:12.660 higher education,
01:02:13.780 who apparently
01:02:15.280 was a critic
01:02:16.300 of Putin,
01:02:17.520 died mysteriously
01:02:18.360 on a flight.
01:02:19.720 Nobody knows
01:02:20.520 why.
01:02:21.300 He just got
01:02:21.880 on the flight
01:02:22.300 and he fell
01:02:22.960 ill and he
01:02:23.600 died.
01:02:24.500 I wonder if
01:02:25.040 he ate
01:02:25.400 anything on
01:02:25.940 the flight.
01:02:28.240 A big
01:02:28.740 old coincidence,
01:02:30.020 all these
01:02:30.700 Kremlin
01:02:31.020 critics,
01:02:31.580 they just
01:02:31.860 keep dying.
01:02:34.220 You know,
01:02:35.060 it's kind
01:02:36.020 of amazing
01:02:36.520 that Putin
01:02:38.080 just murders
01:02:38.740 his critics
01:02:39.540 and apparently
01:02:41.260 he's done
01:02:41.800 enough of it
01:02:42.420 so we're
01:02:42.780 just used
01:02:43.220 to it.
01:02:44.280 Do you
01:02:44.500 remember
01:02:44.720 when it
01:02:45.000 was a
01:02:45.260 big story
01:02:45.780 that Putin
01:02:46.280 murdered a
01:02:46.940 critic?
01:02:48.240 And now
01:02:48.840 it's just
01:02:49.280 one of the
01:02:50.420 stories.
01:02:52.400 Putin
01:02:52.840 actually made
01:02:53.500 us get
01:02:53.860 used to the
01:02:54.420 fact that he
01:02:54.960 murders his
01:02:55.660 critics outside
01:02:56.800 the country.
01:02:57.280 We just
01:02:59.860 got used
01:03:00.280 to it.
01:03:01.860 Have I
01:03:02.360 told you
01:03:02.640 that before
01:03:03.060 that you
01:03:03.360 can get
01:03:03.680 used to
01:03:04.060 anything?
01:03:05.880 This is a
01:03:06.400 perfect example.
01:03:07.980 It was the
01:03:08.620 biggest outrage
01:03:09.240 and now it's
01:03:09.860 just a little
01:03:10.520 news story.
01:03:11.260 Putin's
01:03:11.580 killing another
01:03:13.040 person.
01:03:15.180 All right.
01:03:17.400 For those
01:03:18.040 of you who
01:03:18.460 are nice
01:03:18.780 enough to
01:03:19.140 wait to
01:03:19.420 the end,
01:03:20.900 I give
01:03:21.660 you the
01:03:22.140 most provocative,
01:03:24.160 dangerous
01:03:24.660 thought you've
01:03:26.660 ever seen.
01:03:27.840 I call it
01:03:28.560 my fear
01:03:29.380 map.
01:03:30.780 It's on the
01:03:31.320 back of this
01:03:31.760 whiteboard.
01:03:33.820 And I'm
01:03:35.260 going to
01:03:35.400 cause some
01:03:35.800 trouble here.
01:03:42.780 Now,
01:03:43.660 people sometimes
01:03:44.520 ask me,
01:03:45.180 Scott,
01:03:46.020 why are you
01:03:47.540 saying this?
01:03:48.820 So they
01:03:49.380 don't question
01:03:49.900 what I say,
01:03:51.280 but often
01:03:51.720 they'll say,
01:03:52.300 what's your
01:03:52.800 purpose?
01:03:53.500 What are you
01:03:53.760 trying to
01:03:54.140 accomplish here?
01:03:55.120 So I'll tell
01:03:55.820 you what I'm
01:03:56.540 trying to
01:03:56.980 accomplish,
01:03:57.900 and then I'll
01:03:58.360 explain it.
01:03:59.420 What I'm
01:04:00.040 trying to
01:04:00.440 accomplish is,
01:04:01.600 since I
01:04:02.080 find myself
01:04:02.760 in a unique
01:04:03.500 situation that
01:04:05.400 I'm already
01:04:05.980 cancelled,
01:04:07.220 I can't get
01:04:07.860 too much extra
01:04:08.900 cancelled,
01:04:09.700 it wouldn't
01:04:10.020 make that much
01:04:10.560 difference,
01:04:11.320 so I have
01:04:12.320 free speech
01:04:13.140 in a way that
01:04:14.820 you don't.
01:04:15.320 So I can
01:04:17.280 simply say
01:04:17.920 things that I
01:04:18.540 think would be
01:04:19.100 useful,
01:04:20.000 and I am
01:04:20.360 trying to
01:04:20.820 focus on
01:04:22.320 things that are
01:04:22.840 useful.
01:04:23.780 I'm not
01:04:24.380 just trying
01:04:24.760 to mix
01:04:25.340 stuff up,
01:04:26.220 not trying
01:04:26.740 to get
01:04:27.000 some extra
01:04:27.520 clicks.
01:04:28.640 Everybody
01:04:28.980 likes extra
01:04:29.660 clicks,
01:04:30.360 but that's
01:04:30.740 not why I'm
01:04:31.180 doing it.
01:04:32.040 I'm doing it
01:04:32.620 because there
01:04:32.900 are just
01:04:33.120 some things
01:04:33.820 that I
01:04:34.980 uniquely can
01:04:35.760 say out
01:04:36.200 loud that
01:04:37.540 are useful,
01:04:38.520 I only do
01:04:39.200 useful things,
01:04:40.300 that you need
01:04:41.060 to hear.
01:04:42.880 Specifically,
01:04:43.900 what I'm
01:04:44.600 going to talk
01:04:45.000 about would
01:04:45.400 be useful
01:04:45.920 for black
01:04:47.300 Americans.
01:04:47.760 It won't
01:04:49.360 feel like
01:04:49.900 it.
01:04:51.440 It might
01:04:51.960 feel the
01:04:52.380 opposite.
01:04:53.820 But here's
01:04:54.760 my general
01:04:56.600 statement.
01:04:58.580 You need
01:04:59.140 to have
01:04:59.420 good
01:04:59.720 information
01:05:00.240 to make
01:05:01.200 good
01:05:01.500 decisions.
01:05:02.740 You all
01:05:03.240 agree with
01:05:03.640 that,
01:05:03.960 right?
01:05:04.620 The better
01:05:05.060 your information
01:05:06.060 about your
01:05:06.980 situation,
01:05:07.520 the better
01:05:07.820 decisions you
01:05:08.500 can make.
01:05:09.200 I believe
01:05:09.740 that black
01:05:10.180 Americans are
01:05:11.120 crippled by
01:05:12.640 the fact that
01:05:13.220 white people
01:05:13.720 lie to them
01:05:14.360 about everything.
01:05:15.040 white people,
01:05:18.080 can you give
01:05:18.480 me some
01:05:18.800 confirmation?
01:05:19.980 White people
01:05:20.440 lie to black
01:05:21.120 Americans about
01:05:21.820 everything because
01:05:22.540 we've been
01:05:22.940 trained to lie.
01:05:24.120 We've been
01:05:24.480 trained to
01:05:24.940 hide our
01:05:25.280 true opinions
01:05:25.880 because we
01:05:26.920 would be
01:05:27.240 demonized if
01:05:28.120 we were even
01:05:28.800 just objectively
01:05:29.660 talking about
01:05:30.420 data,
01:05:31.360 right?
01:05:31.960 Even if
01:05:32.660 white people
01:05:33.840 are just
01:05:34.500 trying to
01:05:35.780 help,
01:05:37.060 trying to
01:05:37.760 help will
01:05:38.160 get you
01:05:38.500 canceled,
01:05:39.380 for sure.
01:05:40.880 All right?
01:05:41.360 So here I am,
01:05:42.400 I'm going to
01:05:42.780 try to help,
01:05:43.800 and it's
01:05:44.140 something I
01:05:44.620 couldn't
01:05:44.960 have done
01:05:45.440 except I'm
01:05:46.740 already
01:05:46.960 canceled.
01:05:48.300 So you're
01:05:49.060 going to
01:05:49.180 see one
01:05:49.500 of the
01:05:49.740 rare things
01:05:50.440 that you've
01:05:50.800 ever seen
01:05:51.320 in public,
01:05:52.640 a canceled
01:05:53.620 person telling
01:05:55.040 you the
01:05:55.380 truth.
01:05:57.340 Now, I'm
01:05:58.300 going to
01:05:58.500 prime you
01:05:58.880 a little
01:05:59.140 bit more.
01:06:00.880 This type
01:06:01.680 of topic
01:06:02.240 necessarily
01:06:03.460 is easier
01:06:04.180 to talk
01:06:04.620 about when
01:06:05.680 you talk
01:06:06.040 about groups
01:06:06.760 of people
01:06:07.320 acting on
01:06:08.120 average.
01:06:09.220 If I
01:06:09.660 say white
01:06:10.420 people,
01:06:11.700 like cheese,
01:06:13.420 you're
01:06:13.960 smart enough
01:06:14.480 to know
01:06:14.880 that I
01:06:15.360 don't
01:06:15.520 mean every
01:06:16.040 white person
01:06:16.600 likes cheese,
01:06:17.620 right?
01:06:18.480 It's just
01:06:18.760 sort of a
01:06:19.100 general statement.
01:06:20.480 If I say
01:06:21.200 black people
01:06:21.860 like hip-hop,
01:06:23.220 you're smart
01:06:24.120 enough to
01:06:24.520 know not
01:06:25.360 everyone,
01:06:26.660 not every
01:06:27.260 black person
01:06:27.820 likes hip-hop.
01:06:28.680 That'd be
01:06:29.020 crazy.
01:06:30.360 So everything
01:06:31.240 I say about
01:06:31.960 any group
01:06:32.500 is just a
01:06:33.160 generalization.
01:06:34.040 It does not
01:06:34.520 include you
01:06:35.240 or any
01:06:36.400 specific person.
01:06:37.820 The next
01:06:38.560 thing I'm
01:06:38.920 going to say,
01:06:39.440 which is very
01:06:39.960 important,
01:06:40.820 under no
01:06:41.760 circumstances
01:06:42.540 does it
01:06:43.840 ever make
01:06:44.280 sense to
01:06:44.880 discriminate
01:06:45.440 against an
01:06:46.860 individual?
01:06:48.660 In romance,
01:06:50.780 in hiring,
01:06:51.900 in your
01:06:52.140 social life,
01:06:52.880 your family
01:06:53.280 life,
01:06:54.340 any kind
01:06:55.040 of employment,
01:06:56.100 anything like
01:06:56.520 that,
01:06:57.060 giving somebody
01:06:57.860 a loan,
01:06:58.940 it makes
01:06:59.860 no sense to
01:07:00.780 discriminate
01:07:01.280 individually,
01:07:02.300 because it
01:07:02.800 doesn't help
01:07:03.260 the person
01:07:03.680 you're
01:07:03.900 discriminating
01:07:04.540 against,
01:07:05.640 it doesn't
01:07:06.240 help the
01:07:06.700 system,
01:07:07.440 you know,
01:07:07.620 the United
01:07:08.020 States,
01:07:08.780 it doesn't
01:07:09.340 help you
01:07:09.840 as a
01:07:10.520 discriminator,
01:07:11.360 you're just
01:07:11.680 cutting yourself
01:07:12.300 off from,
01:07:13.320 you know,
01:07:13.600 the beauty
01:07:14.280 and talent
01:07:15.040 of most
01:07:15.880 of the
01:07:16.080 world.
01:07:16.740 So if you
01:07:17.260 have a
01:07:17.520 situation
01:07:17.900 where nobody
01:07:18.500 wins,
01:07:19.940 how can you
01:07:20.440 possibly be
01:07:21.000 in favor of
01:07:21.560 any part
01:07:22.040 of that?
01:07:22.860 So discrimination
01:07:23.640 against individuals,
01:07:25.880 you can't favor
01:07:26.700 it on any
01:07:27.420 level,
01:07:28.560 because there
01:07:28.960 are no
01:07:29.200 winners,
01:07:29.580 it's just a
01:07:30.140 lose all the
01:07:30.760 way across.
01:07:31.720 And it's the
01:07:32.380 opposite of what
01:07:33.160 made America
01:07:33.800 great,
01:07:34.700 which is we
01:07:35.240 tried really
01:07:35.880 hard not to
01:07:36.560 be those
01:07:36.900 people.
01:07:37.480 We didn't
01:07:37.820 succeed,
01:07:38.880 but we tried
01:07:39.440 really hard
01:07:40.080 to be those
01:07:40.940 people.
01:07:42.640 So with
01:07:43.740 that in
01:07:44.100 mind,
01:07:44.980 I give
01:07:45.420 you the
01:07:46.540 fear map.
01:07:50.500 Now,
01:07:51.220 I'm roughly
01:07:52.100 dividing people
01:07:53.160 in the United
01:07:53.620 States by
01:07:54.400 income and
01:07:55.720 education.
01:07:56.760 Would you
01:07:57.440 agree that
01:07:58.000 education is
01:07:58.840 highly correlated
01:08:00.160 with income?
01:08:01.900 Again,
01:08:02.820 we're not
01:08:03.280 talking about
01:08:03.820 every person.
01:08:05.140 Of course,
01:08:05.780 there are
01:08:06.000 people who
01:08:06.380 didn't go to
01:08:06.880 college and
01:08:07.360 made a lot
01:08:07.780 of money.
01:08:08.220 Of course.
01:08:08.680 But in
01:08:09.560 general,
01:08:10.700 the higher
01:08:11.020 your education,
01:08:11.900 the greater
01:08:12.180 your income.
01:08:13.540 Now,
01:08:14.220 I'm going to
01:08:14.460 start with
01:08:15.800 a white
01:08:17.080 person in
01:08:17.820 America's
01:08:18.560 experience.
01:08:20.200 Now,
01:08:20.440 when I talk
01:08:20.880 about fear,
01:08:22.320 I'm talking
01:08:22.820 about a
01:08:24.100 visceral,
01:08:25.000 irrational
01:08:25.540 reaction.
01:08:27.160 I'm not
01:08:27.860 talking about
01:08:28.280 logic.
01:08:29.580 This is
01:08:29.920 just fear,
01:08:30.740 irrational
01:08:31.140 fear.
01:08:32.560 As a
01:08:33.340 white
01:08:33.580 American,
01:08:34.260 if I go
01:08:34.760 into a
01:08:35.180 low-income
01:08:35.800 area that's
01:08:36.520 all white
01:08:37.360 Americans,
01:08:38.520 am I
01:08:38.860 afraid?
01:08:40.620 If I go
01:08:41.480 to a
01:08:41.900 low-income
01:08:42.420 area that's
01:08:43.140 just all
01:08:43.540 white people,
01:08:44.640 am I
01:08:44.980 afraid for
01:08:45.700 my life?
01:08:46.960 Nope.
01:08:47.740 Not even
01:08:48.160 a little.
01:08:48.960 I grew up
01:08:49.720 in a low-income,
01:08:51.080 mostly white
01:08:51.680 area.
01:08:53.180 I never even
01:08:53.720 thought about
01:08:54.120 it.
01:08:55.020 I never even
01:08:55.860 thought about
01:08:56.280 violence.
01:08:57.160 I mean,
01:08:57.320 there was
01:08:57.500 plenty of
01:08:57.920 violence,
01:08:58.440 because it's
01:08:59.220 everywhere.
01:08:59.900 But I
01:09:00.340 didn't have
01:09:00.600 any special
01:09:01.200 fear about
01:09:02.360 white people
01:09:02.880 being a
01:09:03.800 white person.
01:09:05.660 Suppose I
01:09:06.260 go into a
01:09:06.820 middle-income
01:09:07.360 environment.
01:09:08.100 I get a
01:09:08.460 blue-collar
01:09:08.900 job.
01:09:09.380 I just
01:09:09.640 go to
01:09:09.920 work.
01:09:10.760 And let's
01:09:11.120 say that
01:09:12.080 my coworkers
01:09:12.680 are all
01:09:13.220 white.
01:09:14.300 Am I
01:09:14.720 afraid of
01:09:15.200 anything
01:09:15.560 special?
01:09:17.040 Well,
01:09:17.400 just the
01:09:17.780 normal
01:09:18.080 dangers of
01:09:18.740 life.
01:09:19.720 But I'm
01:09:20.120 not extra
01:09:20.760 afraid because
01:09:21.460 my coworkers
01:09:22.120 are white.
01:09:23.200 Why would
01:09:23.620 I be?
01:09:25.040 It wouldn't
01:09:25.600 even come
01:09:25.960 up.
01:09:27.520 How about
01:09:28.100 high-income
01:09:28.540 and high
01:09:29.140 education?
01:09:29.920 If I
01:09:30.280 spend some
01:09:31.220 time around
01:09:31.740 some highly
01:09:32.600 educated
01:09:33.040 white people,
01:09:34.120 would I
01:09:35.100 be in
01:09:35.560 trouble?
01:09:36.780 Well,
01:09:37.580 yes,
01:09:37.940 a little
01:09:38.200 bit.
01:09:39.680 The higher
01:09:40.520 educated
01:09:40.980 white people
01:09:41.580 are more
01:09:42.000 likely to
01:09:42.600 accuse you
01:09:43.100 of being
01:09:43.360 a racist.
01:09:44.400 Am I
01:09:44.640 right?
01:09:46.220 High-income
01:09:47.160 white people
01:09:47.820 will accuse
01:09:49.200 other white
01:09:49.780 people of
01:09:50.200 being racists.
01:09:51.180 That's where
01:09:51.480 it comes
01:09:51.800 from.
01:09:52.440 Universities
01:09:53.000 and people
01:09:54.060 who write
01:09:54.340 books and
01:09:54.800 stuff.
01:09:55.740 So as a
01:09:56.780 white person
01:09:57.260 in America,
01:09:58.440 I would
01:09:58.700 feel,
01:10:00.060 again,
01:10:00.460 it's just
01:10:00.760 a feeling,
01:10:01.760 I would
01:10:02.080 feel no
01:10:02.620 risk around
01:10:03.920 poor white
01:10:04.940 people.
01:10:06.220 There would
01:10:06.620 be a risk
01:10:07.100 because income
01:10:08.120 and crime
01:10:09.860 come together.
01:10:11.240 So there
01:10:11.580 would be a
01:10:11.940 little extra
01:10:12.300 risk, but I
01:10:12.840 wouldn't feel
01:10:13.260 it.
01:10:13.900 I've never
01:10:14.300 felt it.
01:10:15.180 In fact,
01:10:15.900 I can think
01:10:16.640 of zero
01:10:17.140 places in the
01:10:17.920 United States
01:10:18.680 that are
01:10:19.760 mostly white
01:10:20.620 that I would
01:10:21.860 have any
01:10:22.220 danger feeling
01:10:23.500 going to,
01:10:24.460 although there
01:10:24.860 would be
01:10:25.220 elevated risk
01:10:26.180 with lower
01:10:26.720 income.
01:10:28.220 In the middle
01:10:28.940 income, I don't
01:10:29.740 worry about white
01:10:30.420 people at all
01:10:31.120 at the high
01:10:31.600 income, I do
01:10:32.280 worry about
01:10:32.740 them.
01:10:33.520 At high
01:10:34.200 income, white
01:10:35.520 people I do
01:10:36.220 see as
01:10:36.620 potentially my
01:10:37.600 enemy.
01:10:38.880 Does that
01:10:39.360 make sense?
01:10:40.900 Not
01:10:41.420 necessarily my
01:10:42.280 enemy, but
01:10:43.160 potentially.
01:10:44.940 Yeah.
01:10:45.920 Now let's
01:10:46.640 say you're a
01:10:48.960 black American,
01:10:50.780 and we'll just
01:10:51.260 reverse it.
01:10:52.880 You're a black
01:10:53.740 American and
01:10:54.440 you're in a
01:10:54.900 low-income
01:10:55.420 area.
01:10:56.460 Is your
01:10:57.280 danger higher?
01:10:58.320 Probably.
01:11:00.960 Probably.
01:11:01.600 If you're a
01:11:02.560 black American
01:11:03.120 and you're in a
01:11:03.760 middle-income
01:11:04.240 environment, is
01:11:05.620 your danger
01:11:06.160 higher?
01:11:06.960 Probably not.
01:11:08.740 I mean,
01:11:09.680 probably not,
01:11:11.020 right?
01:11:11.940 How about if
01:11:12.620 you're black and
01:11:13.440 you're in a
01:11:13.740 high-income,
01:11:14.400 high-education
01:11:15.040 area?
01:11:16.220 Probably not
01:11:16.920 much danger
01:11:17.460 at all.
01:11:18.880 You'd probably
01:11:19.680 be pretty happy.
01:11:21.460 Suppose you're
01:11:22.560 a white person
01:11:23.440 and you're
01:11:24.680 contemplating going
01:11:25.580 into an all-black
01:11:26.660 area that's also
01:11:27.540 low-income.
01:11:29.040 Would that be
01:11:29.820 risky?
01:11:30.720 To be a
01:11:31.440 white person
01:11:32.020 going into a
01:11:32.840 low-income,
01:11:34.080 mostly black
01:11:34.780 area?
01:11:35.760 Well, you can
01:11:36.560 talk about the
01:11:37.180 data or the
01:11:37.800 statistics, but I
01:11:38.980 can tell you with
01:11:39.620 certainty that would
01:11:40.820 scare the shit out
01:11:41.840 of all white
01:11:42.480 people.
01:11:44.020 All of them.
01:11:46.760 Now, of course,
01:11:47.760 when I say all,
01:11:48.820 I don't really mean
01:11:49.600 all, right?
01:11:50.800 Because every time I
01:11:51.780 talk about a group,
01:11:52.620 it's never all.
01:11:53.900 It's just sort of
01:11:54.540 an average.
01:11:55.500 Yeah, white people
01:11:56.240 are scared to death
01:11:57.160 of going into
01:11:57.960 low-income,
01:11:59.320 black areas.
01:12:01.720 What about white
01:12:02.760 people going into
01:12:03.940 an environment that
01:12:05.000 had a big mix
01:12:06.840 of lots of black
01:12:08.420 people in the
01:12:09.180 workplace along
01:12:10.140 with everybody
01:12:10.840 else?
01:12:11.720 So it's not
01:12:12.300 mostly black, but
01:12:13.240 it's a good mix
01:12:14.180 of diversity.
01:12:15.600 Would a white
01:12:16.260 person have any
01:12:17.040 fear being in
01:12:18.740 an environment that
01:12:19.720 was a mixed group
01:12:21.120 versus, let's say,
01:12:22.280 all white?
01:12:23.500 Yes.
01:12:24.620 Because the fear
01:12:25.480 is that you will
01:12:26.160 be accused of
01:12:26.980 racism.
01:12:28.780 Right?
01:12:29.940 If you work in a
01:12:31.280 mixed group, the
01:12:32.120 odds of you being
01:12:32.860 a white person
01:12:33.580 being accused of
01:12:35.000 being of racism
01:12:35.620 are close to
01:12:36.660 100%.
01:12:37.400 Do you want
01:12:38.960 that?
01:12:40.040 That's an extra
01:12:40.820 risk that you
01:12:41.760 don't have to put
01:12:42.340 up with.
01:12:43.400 How about if
01:12:43.940 you're a white
01:12:44.300 person and you're
01:12:45.180 in an environment
01:12:45.760 where there's a
01:12:46.920 lot of diversity
01:12:47.660 at the higher
01:12:49.340 income level?
01:12:50.000 Well, they're
01:12:52.100 going to tell
01:12:52.500 you that you're
01:12:53.240 the problem,
01:12:54.240 that you're
01:12:54.680 supporting white
01:12:55.880 supremacy, and
01:12:57.380 you owe me
01:12:58.040 some money.
01:13:00.000 Right?
01:13:00.540 So if you're a
01:13:02.780 white person in
01:13:03.600 a diverse
01:13:04.180 environment, you've
01:13:05.140 got the extra
01:13:05.780 risk that they're
01:13:06.560 going to ask for
01:13:07.160 reparations.
01:13:08.200 No white person
01:13:09.260 has ever asked
01:13:09.960 me for reparations.
01:13:11.860 Again, this has
01:13:12.780 nothing to do with
01:13:13.620 whether the
01:13:14.280 reparations are a
01:13:15.100 good or bad
01:13:15.640 idea.
01:13:16.580 I'm just saying
01:13:17.420 from a risk
01:13:18.160 management
01:13:19.580 perspective, being
01:13:21.760 in California is
01:13:22.960 riskier than
01:13:24.340 being in Idaho.
01:13:25.920 Am I wrong?
01:13:27.100 In California, there's
01:13:28.240 a risk I will pay
01:13:29.080 reparations for
01:13:30.360 having nothing to
01:13:31.220 do with slavery.
01:13:32.260 That's a risk.
01:13:34.000 If I go to
01:13:34.920 Idaho, probably
01:13:36.080 no risk.
01:13:37.560 Probably no risk
01:13:38.720 of any reparations.
01:13:41.460 So, I will say
01:13:44.120 again, if you're
01:13:46.420 dealing with an
01:13:47.060 individual of any
01:13:49.440 color, ethnicity,
01:13:50.740 religion, gender,
01:13:52.100 you have to treat
01:13:52.980 them as an
01:13:53.480 individual.
01:13:54.320 You just have to.
01:13:55.360 It's good for you.
01:13:56.660 It's good for them.
01:13:57.860 And it's the only
01:13:58.440 thing that makes our
01:13:59.120 system work.
01:14:00.540 However, if you're
01:14:02.140 judging your personal
01:14:03.340 risk, you can use
01:14:06.200 averages.
01:14:07.820 It's not against the
01:14:08.980 Constitution.
01:14:10.180 It's not against the
01:14:11.440 law.
01:14:12.380 It's not unethical.
01:14:14.180 It's not immoral.
01:14:15.260 It's just risk
01:14:17.100 management.
01:14:18.640 It's just risk
01:14:19.660 management.
01:14:20.720 And everybody gets
01:14:21.700 to do that.
01:14:23.100 There's nothing that
01:14:24.180 took away your ability
01:14:25.420 to manage your own
01:14:26.520 personal risk.
01:14:29.260 So, I would say if
01:14:31.840 you're a white person,
01:14:33.000 there are three areas
01:14:33.900 you should have extra
01:14:35.940 concern about because
01:14:38.140 your risk would be
01:14:38.800 higher.
01:14:39.520 Anywhere there's a
01:14:40.300 high ratio of black
01:14:42.120 people in a low-income
01:14:43.180 area, anytime you're
01:14:44.760 working with a number
01:14:45.980 of black people who
01:14:46.860 have been trained by
01:14:48.080 society to see you as
01:14:49.980 the enemy and then
01:14:50.980 accuse you of
01:14:51.680 discrimination, whether
01:14:52.620 you do it or not.
01:14:53.760 And then the high-income
01:14:54.720 group, you get the
01:14:56.060 professors who will say
01:14:57.200 not only are you
01:14:58.120 discriminating at the
01:14:59.160 moment, but just by
01:15:01.100 existing.
01:15:02.400 Your mere existence
01:15:03.620 makes you an asshole.
01:15:08.080 So, should you use
01:15:10.620 your risk management
01:15:11.880 common sense to stay
01:15:14.420 away from dangerous
01:15:15.560 situations?
01:15:16.720 Or, should you allow
01:15:19.580 yourself to be in what
01:15:20.660 are obviously more
01:15:21.720 dangerous situations?
01:15:23.540 Because that would be
01:15:24.800 the moral thing to do.
01:15:27.300 Is it more moral to put
01:15:30.000 yourself in obviously
01:15:31.640 more dangerous
01:15:32.300 situations?
01:15:33.420 Not physically, but
01:15:34.380 also reputationally and
01:15:35.780 money-wise, etc.
01:15:37.080 Now, it is moral and
01:15:40.540 ethical to manage your
01:15:42.260 risk any way you want.
01:15:44.640 Any way you want.
01:15:47.760 Am I cancelled?
01:15:50.240 Did I say anything you
01:15:51.440 don't agree with?
01:15:53.980 Was there one thing
01:15:55.120 here, anything, that you
01:15:56.740 didn't agree with?
01:15:58.080 No, you agreed with all
01:15:59.040 of it, right?
01:16:02.000 You know this is what got
01:16:03.260 me cancelled, right?
01:16:04.020 So, earlier in the
01:16:07.220 live stream I said, I
01:16:08.440 didn't get cancelled for
01:16:09.440 what I said.
01:16:10.900 I got cancelled because
01:16:12.140 I was a truck going
01:16:14.020 through the neighbourhood
01:16:14.720 that wanted to put their
01:16:16.280 message on a truck.
01:16:17.660 So, I just happened to
01:16:18.420 be the truck.
01:16:19.380 And they just loaded me
01:16:20.600 up with their message and
01:16:21.440 I carried it with them.
01:16:23.100 I couldn't get it off my
01:16:24.480 truck bed.
01:16:25.920 It was too late.
01:16:27.520 That's all my fault, by
01:16:28.640 the way.
01:16:28.960 I take full responsibility.
01:16:31.100 Just to be clear, I always
01:16:33.160 take full responsibility
01:16:34.400 for my own actions and
01:16:37.260 the outcomes.
01:16:38.100 So, of course, I take
01:16:38.880 full responsibility for
01:16:40.060 getting cancelled.
01:16:41.220 But you should understand
01:16:42.400 the mechanism, which is
01:16:44.420 slightly different from
01:16:45.300 who takes responsibility.
01:16:47.920 Now, when I explained it
01:16:50.220 this way, you all said,
01:16:53.160 oh, right?
01:16:54.660 But when I explained it in
01:16:57.900 the, let's say, the
01:16:59.340 angrier, more provocative
01:17:01.160 way, where I said, you
01:17:02.820 just stay the F away from
01:17:04.460 blah, blah, blah, it was
01:17:06.800 just this story.
01:17:08.260 It was just this.
01:17:10.080 And when I explained it
01:17:11.520 without the hyperbole and
01:17:12.680 without the swearing, you
01:17:14.740 just looked at it and said,
01:17:16.020 oh, yeah, that makes sense.
01:17:17.580 Yeah, that is high risk.
01:17:18.940 Now, what's different is
01:17:20.240 it's hard to manage, you
01:17:23.560 know, in the short term,
01:17:25.180 the extra risk that comes
01:17:26.580 with low income, right?
01:17:28.120 Because low income and crime
01:17:29.880 are pretty entangled.
01:17:32.060 But I would say that at the
01:17:33.300 middle income and high
01:17:34.260 income, there's a media
01:17:36.720 poisoning.
01:17:38.320 And the media has poisoned
01:17:39.920 black Americans.
01:17:41.760 And black Americans have not
01:17:43.080 yet figured out that white
01:17:45.400 Americans really need to kind
01:17:46.640 of stay away from them for
01:17:48.200 their own safety.
01:17:49.860 Again, not individuals.
01:17:52.600 If there's an individual,
01:17:54.060 you should treat them
01:17:57.180 individually.
01:17:58.080 But if you're deciding,
01:17:59.360 should I go to an
01:18:00.180 environment where my
01:18:01.540 co-workers would be mixed
01:18:03.080 or less mixed, you are
01:18:06.900 managing your risk in a
01:18:08.360 realistic way that the
01:18:10.200 media has created.
01:18:11.440 You didn't create that.
01:18:12.840 You did not create any of
01:18:14.420 that risk.
01:18:15.820 And you do get to avoid it
01:18:17.920 if that's your preference.
01:18:21.040 Now, if somebody, a number
01:18:23.660 of people said that you
01:18:26.040 should increase your
01:18:27.580 personal risk to make sure
01:18:30.320 that there's plenty of
01:18:31.640 interaction among groups,
01:18:33.940 because in the long run,
01:18:36.140 the mixture of the people
01:18:39.040 will give you a better
01:18:39.820 outcome.
01:18:40.820 You know, you'll get used
01:18:41.480 to people and, you know,
01:18:42.860 discrimination will go away
01:18:44.040 on its own.
01:18:45.360 To which I say, I don't
01:18:46.760 think you've lived in the
01:18:47.560 real world at all.
01:18:48.420 And it's not my job to
01:18:50.680 make the world better in
01:18:51.760 50 years because I did
01:18:54.380 what you described.
01:18:56.180 My job is to not get my
01:18:58.140 ass kicked.
01:18:59.580 That's my job.
01:19:00.920 I just don't want my ass
01:19:02.020 to get kicked.
01:19:03.300 I don't want my reputation
01:19:05.620 or my money to be taken.
01:19:08.060 That's all.
01:19:09.200 So I'm just going to look
01:19:10.000 out for that stuff.
01:19:12.880 So, I'm loving the nature
01:19:16.680 of the comments, because
01:19:18.580 usually when I'm doing
01:19:19.460 my silly stuff, you know,
01:19:21.220 there'll be silly comments.
01:19:22.880 And if I do things you
01:19:23.940 disagree with, you know,
01:19:25.380 there's a big pushback
01:19:26.820 that's coming in immediately.
01:19:28.560 But this kind of scrambled
01:19:30.720 your brain a little bit,
01:19:31.680 didn't it?
01:19:32.780 Maybe in a way you liked.
01:19:35.400 But I can tell when you
01:19:36.920 get a little quiet that
01:19:38.580 there's some processing going.
01:19:40.280 So I think there's a lot
01:19:42.580 of processing happening
01:19:43.620 on this right now.
01:19:44.360 All right, that, ladies
01:19:47.040 and gentlemen, is the
01:19:48.220 conclusion of my live stream
01:19:50.360 for today.
01:19:51.820 YouTube, thanks for coming
01:19:53.100 back after I so rudely
01:19:54.560 disconnected you yesterday
01:19:56.060 because my battery died.
01:19:58.380 But I think it was worth it.
01:20:01.860 And, yeah, most of you,
01:20:05.100 I think, were on this page.
01:20:06.800 So here's a writer's trick
01:20:08.300 for you.
01:20:09.380 Here's how I describe
01:20:10.360 a good writer.
01:20:11.160 A good writer,
01:20:13.160 at least in the
01:20:13.980 nonfiction world,
01:20:15.420 a good writer is somebody
01:20:16.560 who says what you
01:20:17.440 already think,
01:20:18.840 but they say it better
01:20:20.540 than you were thinking it.
01:20:22.080 Have you ever heard me
01:20:22.740 say that before?
01:20:24.140 So that's what this was.
01:20:26.320 This was me telling you
01:20:27.560 what you already thought,
01:20:29.220 most of you, I think.
01:20:30.940 But I said it better
01:20:32.560 than you were thinking it.
01:20:33.920 So now you can think it better
01:20:35.520 because you've just seen
01:20:37.680 another way to model it.
01:20:39.080 So that's it for today.
01:20:42.020 YouTube, I'll see you
01:20:42.680 in the morning tomorrow.
01:20:43.780 Come on back.
01:20:44.940 Bye for now.