Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2122 Scott Adams： Too-On-The-Nose Rule For Spotting Fake News Would Have Changed Everything

00:00:00.000 Do-do-do-do-do. Do-do-do-do-do-do.

00:00:06.020 Wake up, sleepyheads. I know it's a Sunday and you like to sleep in, but how in the world are you going to watch this live if you're asleep?

00:00:14.860 Well, if you'd like to take this experience, which is the best thing that's ever happened to you, up to levels which nobody can even imagine.

00:00:21.360 All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a stein, a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:30.000 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine of the day, the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:35.920 It's called the simultaneous sip and it's going to happen now. Go.

00:00:44.460 Ah.

00:00:47.920 We all feel better now.

00:00:51.920 Well, I'd like to introduce the theme for today's show.

00:00:56.580 The theme is you have to learn the two-on-the-nose filter for identifying fake news.

00:01:05.260 Now, I talk about this all the time, but I'm going to put the current stories into that filter and see what it tells us.

00:01:13.320 Now, the two-on-the-nose filter works like this.

00:01:16.240 You hear a story in the news and you say to yourself,

00:01:18.960 My God, my hair is on fire because that thing in the news,

00:01:24.420 if your first reaction is,

00:01:27.160 that is exactly what I thought the other side was doing,

00:01:34.580 it's almost certainly not true.

00:01:38.420 Because in the real world, things are messy.

00:01:41.580 Things are, well, it's a little bit like this, but a little bit like that,

00:01:44.780 and a little bit like the third thing.

00:01:46.300 Rarely ever does the news serve up a perfect story that just fits the narrative.

00:01:54.080 If it fits the narrative and there's no rough edges,

00:01:57.760 that's called two-on-the-nose, two-suspiciously perfect.

00:02:04.000 Now, there's an actual theory for why that's true.

00:02:10.380 It's not just a random observation, anecdotal.

00:02:13.420 Well, there's a working theory behind why.

00:02:17.200 And the why is that the thing that makes something news,

00:02:22.120 in other words, the only reason you heard about it,

00:02:24.660 is that it caught your hair on fire.

00:02:27.260 And when people saw this story, real or not real,

00:02:31.620 they said, Ah, my hair's on fire, I can't believe it.

00:02:34.720 Those stories are almost never real.

00:02:37.460 Almost never.

00:02:40.500 Let me give you an example.

00:02:43.100 What was it, the Russians having a bounty on American soldiers in Afghanistan?

00:02:49.400 A little too perfect?

00:02:51.440 And that Trump didn't do anything to push back against that

00:02:54.940 because he was a Russian colluder?

00:02:58.680 A little too neat, right?

00:03:01.040 A nice, neat little package.

00:03:02.780 Don't know who the source is.

00:03:04.300 So you should have been able to identify that as fake from the first moment.

00:03:11.300 It had all of the tells for a fake story.

00:03:14.340 Now, now that we've got a little distance,

00:03:18.300 a little bit of distance from Russia collusion,

00:03:21.760 what do you think about people who believed, from the start,

00:03:25.780 they believed that Donald Trump was literally colluding with Putin?

00:03:31.120 Just think about that from, you know, the distance that we have from the story now.

00:03:38.680 Just imagine that 40% or half of the country or something like that

00:03:44.400 believed it from the start.

00:03:47.400 From the start.

00:03:49.240 And believed it all the way through until it was, you know, debunked.

00:03:52.520 There's no way that was true.

00:03:56.980 You didn't even have to do any research.

00:03:59.940 That one was too on the nose.

00:04:03.820 That had made up fake news all over it from the first minute.

00:04:10.860 All right?

00:04:11.060 Here's another one.

00:04:11.760 The president of the United States stood in front of the public

00:04:15.820 and with advanced planning and full knowledge of what he was doing

00:04:20.180 called neo-Nazis fine people.

00:04:24.880 If you ever believe that actually happened in the real world,

00:04:28.980 you don't know the two-on-the-nose rule 1.00

00:04:31.680 because they were trying to paint Trump as a racist.

00:04:35.460 And then, whoa, look, he did, according to them,

00:04:39.560 he did exactly, exactly the thing that a racist would do.

00:04:43.880 Except it didn't actually happen in the real world.

00:04:47.380 How about the part where Trump doesn't understand science or medicine?

00:04:53.500 Oh, and then he recommends injecting bleach

00:04:56.760 or some kind of disinfectant into your body.

00:04:59.780 From the first moment, you should have known that didn't happen.

00:05:06.980 And it didn't.

00:05:08.260 Now, you say to me, but Scott, I saw the video myself.

00:05:11.280 I saw him say it.

00:05:12.740 No, you didn't.

00:05:14.200 You really did not because it doesn't exist.

00:05:17.760 There's a fake edit that makes it look like it exists,

00:05:21.440 but it lops off the clarifiers in the front and the back.

00:05:25.000 So both of those stories are Rupars.

00:05:28.300 Things that look true if you see the Covington kids edit,

00:05:32.940 but are obviously not true if you see the full story.

00:05:36.980 All right, how about the Kraken?

00:05:40.440 How about that story about the Venezuelan general?

00:05:44.520 Do you remember I called that bullshit from the first moment?

00:05:48.880 But keep in mind, I wanted it to be true in a sense.

00:05:53.240 I kind of wanted it to be true.

00:05:55.020 Now, if you can call bullshit on something while wanting it to be true,

00:06:00.940 then you're using the two-on-the-nose rule correctly.

00:06:06.300 The two-on-the-nose rule is not just for things you don't want to be true.

00:06:12.140 It also applies to your side, right, the stuff that you think is true.

00:06:15.980 So here's one.

00:06:19.520 Target stores is targeting kids with satanic imagery.

00:06:25.800 True or false?

00:06:29.380 Well, apparently there's some element of truth to it.

00:06:32.640 There's a company that makes that kind of stuff,

00:06:35.080 and there's some clothing in the store.

00:06:37.080 But today I saw a compilation video

00:06:39.540 of allegedly the clothing that they're selling to children.

00:06:46.880 Now, I don't know the fact, Jack,

00:06:50.280 but when I saw the examples,

00:06:52.900 they seemed obviously not real to me.

00:06:56.640 To me, they looked obviously too on the nose.

00:06:59.740 It's an actual satanic image in the child's clothing in the store.

00:07:03.740 No, I do not doubt that satanic imagery

00:07:09.260 has worked its way into the mainstream,

00:07:11.700 because that wouldn't even be unusual, would it?

00:07:15.620 I mean, yeah, there was a long period

00:07:17.880 when Nazi imagery was on stuff.

00:07:20.880 I mean, you know, Che Guevara is on clothing.

00:07:25.160 So it's not unusual that clothing styles

00:07:28.960 would promote some horrible element of society.

00:07:33.740 So that's not the two on the nose.

00:07:35.460 You have to see the pictures themselves.

00:07:37.920 So just to be clear,

00:07:39.720 I'm not saying that there's no satanic imagery in Target.

00:07:44.320 I'm not saying that.

00:07:45.580 I'm saying that the compilation video

00:07:48.400 that went around couldn't possibly be true.

00:07:51.900 It's just way too on the nose.

00:07:56.200 All right?

00:07:57.720 But if I'm wrong about that, you will let me know.

00:08:00.920 All right, I see in the comments

00:08:02.420 you keep telling me there's a simulation coincidence

00:08:08.660 that is a funny one.

00:08:12.880 Now, remember, I'm pro-LGBTQ.

00:08:15.880 I know my audience may disagree with me

00:08:17.980 on some of those issues.

00:08:19.660 But this is just a weird coincidence

00:08:21.880 that it's Pride Month coming up in June,

00:08:25.180 Pride Month.

00:08:25.820 And somebody pointed out on a meme

00:08:28.660 that if you connect Pride and Month

00:08:33.160 together as one word,

00:08:36.180 the middle of it would spell demon

00:08:37.940 because Pride ends with D-E

00:08:41.040 and Month starts with M-O-N. 1.00

00:08:45.660 Now,

00:08:45.980 that's just a coincidence, right?

00:08:49.980 It's not telling you anything.

00:08:51.560 But

00:08:51.920 that's kind of weird.

00:08:55.340 That's a little too on the nose, too.

00:08:57.240 Yeah, that's a little Bible code-y.

00:08:59.480 If you think that means something,

00:09:01.940 like it's really a hidden message

00:09:03.640 that something

00:09:04.640 demonic is happening,

00:09:06.440 that would be a little too on the nose.

00:09:08.720 That would be too on the nose.

00:09:10.220 I think it's a coincidence.

00:09:12.940 Pretty sure it's a coincidence.

00:09:16.740 Well,

00:09:17.380 here's another indication

00:09:18.380 of how much the media

00:09:19.800 can control your minds.

00:09:22.340 There was a Russian survey

00:09:23.900 of Russian public.

00:09:27.420 And

00:09:27.600 Putin still has,

00:09:28.900 you know,

00:09:29.300 support there.

00:09:30.640 But he has a lot more male support

00:09:32.260 than female. 0.97

00:09:34.420 I don't know what that means.

00:09:36.560 Why do you think Putin would have

00:09:37.720 more male support than female? 0.68

00:09:40.220 Is that just because

00:09:41.740 he's doing manly things

00:09:42.880 and they like it?

00:09:43.660 Because he's strong?

00:09:44.960 And the women are fearing 0.92

00:09:46.240 for their sons,

00:09:47.300 but the men are like,

00:09:48.160 oh,

00:09:48.480 let's take off our shirts

00:09:49.700 and fight bears.

00:09:51.320 Something like that.

00:09:52.340 That probably explains it.

00:09:54.040 The machismo part.

00:09:56.180 All right,

00:09:56.480 but

00:09:56.720 here's the interesting part

00:09:58.120 about that.

00:09:58.840 Among those Russian

00:10:00.180 public people

00:10:01.360 who receive information

00:10:03.060 from television,

00:10:07.880 they were the most

00:10:09.220 supportive of Putin.

00:10:11.860 39%.

00:10:12.380 Or was it the war?

00:10:16.100 Putin.

00:10:17.280 And

00:10:17.720 the people

00:10:19.520 who supported them

00:10:20.200 the least

00:10:20.720 are the ones

00:10:21.180 who read the telegram channels.

00:10:23.380 So the telegram channels

00:10:24.860 would be

00:10:25.540 messages that

00:10:26.720 are not from

00:10:27.740 Putin's control.

00:10:29.340 And television in Russia

00:10:30.760 would be

00:10:31.340 under Putin's control.

00:10:33.360 So you can see

00:10:34.080 the difference.

00:10:35.000 39%

00:10:36.180 he can control

00:10:38.140 39%

00:10:38.940 of the people

00:10:39.420 if they're watching

00:10:40.260 television,

00:10:41.140 but he can only

00:10:42.100 control

00:10:42.560 23%

00:10:44.200 if they're not

00:10:45.360 watching television

00:10:46.160 and they're using

00:10:46.720 a different source.

00:10:48.620 Now,

00:10:49.820 have I told you

00:10:51.260 a million times

00:10:51.980 that people

00:10:52.420 don't

00:10:53.420 make up

00:10:54.900 their own decisions?

00:10:56.340 They don't decide

00:10:57.240 on politics.

00:10:57.960 Their opinions

00:10:58.400 are assigned to them.

00:10:59.860 Your opinion

00:11:00.440 is assigned to you

00:11:01.100 not from

00:11:01.620 necessarily a person

00:11:02.780 or some cabal

00:11:05.060 but by the channel

00:11:06.380 that you choose

00:11:07.060 to watch.

00:11:08.300 So if you chose

00:11:09.020 to only look

00:11:09.780 at the telegram channels

00:11:11.040 you would end up

00:11:12.760 assigning yourself

00:11:13.640 an opinion

00:11:14.320 that matched that.

00:11:15.720 And if you only

00:11:16.380 watched television

00:11:17.220 and you never

00:11:17.860 watched telegram

00:11:19.120 you would end up

00:11:20.620 being assigned

00:11:21.660 an opinion

00:11:22.060 that came from television.

00:11:23.500 It's very clear

00:11:24.360 that our opinions

00:11:25.920 are assigned.

00:11:28.140 And it's just based

00:11:28.880 on what channel

00:11:29.480 you decide to look at.

00:11:30.400 Although there's

00:11:32.700 a little causation

00:11:34.500 maybe backwards

00:11:35.240 it could be that

00:11:36.160 because you believe

00:11:37.200 a certain truth

00:11:38.040 you spend more time

00:11:39.800 looking at a channel

00:11:41.180 that agrees with you.

00:11:42.600 So it can work

00:11:43.220 both ways.

00:11:46.080 Alright.

00:11:48.660 Let's see what else

00:11:49.640 is going on here.

00:11:51.880 We now know

00:11:52.960 that the money

00:11:53.920 collected by

00:11:54.480 Black Lives Matter

00:11:55.560 only one third

00:11:58.440 of it went to

00:11:59.440 organizations

00:12:00.660 that make

00:12:01.740 the world worse

00:12:02.540 and two thirds

00:12:04.160 of it was

00:12:04.940 either spent

00:12:07.240 by the people

00:12:07.800 who collected it

00:12:08.840 or disappeared

00:12:10.840 or just didn't

00:12:13.080 get spent

00:12:13.700 or something.

00:12:15.940 Now

00:12:16.160 how many of you

00:12:18.020 from the beginning

00:12:18.940 thought that

00:12:20.320 Black Lives Matter

00:12:21.200 was a totally

00:12:22.380 legitimate organization

00:12:25.180 dedicated to

00:12:26.240 the betterment

00:12:26.940 of black Americans?

00:12:29.440 What?

00:12:31.820 You didn't believe

00:12:32.800 it from the start?

00:12:35.200 Did it seem

00:12:36.180 a little opportunistic?

00:12:39.440 Yeah.

00:12:40.840 Yeah.

00:12:41.360 I can tell you

00:12:43.620 that I heard

00:12:44.280 early on

00:12:45.020 from a good source

00:12:45.960 that it was

00:12:46.780 not legitimate.

00:12:48.060 I heard it

00:12:48.520 from an insider

00:12:49.220 early on.

00:12:51.960 So I guess

00:12:52.900 I was there

00:12:53.340 a long time

00:12:53.840 before everybody else.

00:12:54.620 I couldn't say it

00:12:55.240 in public.

00:12:56.460 You know,

00:12:56.620 before I was canceled

00:12:57.500 I couldn't actually

00:12:58.720 say it out loud

00:12:59.680 because it was

00:13:00.740 too dangerous.

00:13:02.100 But now I can say it.

00:13:03.320 Yeah.

00:13:03.540 From the beginning

00:13:04.320 I was informed

00:13:05.360 that it was a fake

00:13:06.280 money-making

00:13:07.080 organization

00:13:08.580 and was not

00:13:10.180 dedicated to

00:13:10.840 fixing anything.

00:13:13.000 So,

00:13:13.540 but I couldn't

00:13:14.100 say it

00:13:14.480 but I can say it

00:13:15.500 now.

00:13:18.460 I would like

00:13:19.280 to give my

00:13:20.180 I'd like to

00:13:23.340 suggest

00:13:24.500 that if I were

00:13:26.560 the lawyer

00:13:27.220 for Derek Chauvin

00:13:28.700 the Chauvin

00:13:29.860 the cop

00:13:30.540 who was

00:13:30.960 convicted

00:13:32.420 for

00:13:32.980 allegedly

00:13:34.120 killing

00:13:34.820 George Floyd

00:13:37.140 I was trying

00:13:38.460 to figure out

00:13:39.080 how I would

00:13:39.920 have done

00:13:40.260 a better job.

00:13:42.480 And here's

00:13:42.880 how I would

00:13:43.320 have done

00:13:43.700 a better job.

00:13:45.600 I think

00:13:46.320 this would work.

00:13:47.100 I'd have to

00:13:47.500 test it first.

00:13:49.620 All right.

00:13:52.120 So

00:13:52.560 Officer

00:13:53.800 Chauvin

00:13:54.860 was around

00:13:56.080 5'8

00:13:56.840 and 140

00:13:57.580 pounds

00:13:58.160 ish

00:13:58.820 and George

00:14:00.280 Floyd

00:14:00.580 was probably

00:14:01.380 over 200

00:14:01.900 pounds

00:14:02.460 and

00:14:03.100 well over

00:14:05.720 6 foot

00:14:06.280 however big

00:14:07.360 it was.

00:14:08.380 So let's

00:14:08.800 say that

00:14:09.300 roughly speaking

00:14:11.000 let's say

00:14:11.460 that

00:14:11.960 George Floyd

00:14:13.640 was 50%

00:14:14.960 bigger

00:14:15.620 they'll say

00:14:17.440 he was 50%

00:14:18.340 bigger

00:14:18.760 than Chauvin

00:14:20.020 just round it

00:14:20.920 off.

00:14:22.180 So I would

00:14:22.840 say if I

00:14:23.520 were the

00:14:23.800 attorney

00:14:24.140 in my

00:14:25.040 closing

00:14:25.480 statements

00:14:26.120 here's how

00:14:26.880 I would

00:14:27.140 deliver my

00:14:27.740 closing

00:14:28.100 statements.

00:14:29.220 Now

00:14:29.380 I'm not a

00:14:29.920 lawyer so

00:14:30.360 this might

00:14:30.760 not be

00:14:31.100 allowed.

00:14:31.440 If I

00:14:32.280 couldn't

00:14:32.880 do this

00:14:33.220 in my

00:14:33.480 closing

00:14:33.820 statements

00:14:34.460 I'd

00:14:35.440 work it

00:14:35.860 into the

00:14:36.240 trial

00:14:36.520 somehow.

00:14:37.860 But I

00:14:38.280 would say

00:14:39.160 all right

00:14:39.620 let's

00:14:40.340 do a

00:14:41.180 demonstration.

00:14:42.320 I don't

00:14:42.820 have anybody

00:14:43.300 here who's

00:14:43.980 over 6

00:14:44.540 foot tall

00:14:45.240 and weighs

00:14:46.220 over 200

00:14:47.440 pounds

00:14:47.880 so I'm

00:14:49.140 going to

00:14:49.280 use myself

00:14:50.060 just for

00:14:51.020 safety.

00:14:52.020 I'll use

00:14:52.440 myself as

00:14:53.420 George Floyd

00:14:54.120 but I'm

00:14:55.420 only 5 foot

00:14:56.120 8 and

00:14:57.320 I only

00:14:57.920 weigh 150

00:14:59.140 pounds.

00:14:59.660 so I'm

00:15:01.100 going to

00:15:01.240 give you

00:15:04.260 my closing

00:15:04.880 arguments

00:15:05.520 with somebody

00:15:07.200 kneeling on

00:15:07.840 my back

00:15:08.440 who is

00:15:09.720 roughly the

00:15:10.260 same ratio

00:15:10.960 of weight

00:15:11.400 as Chauvin

00:15:12.500 was to

00:15:13.020 Floyd.

00:15:14.060 So in

00:15:14.280 my case

00:15:14.780 that would

00:15:15.160 be let's

00:15:16.040 say a

00:15:16.400 10 year

00:15:16.780 old girl.

00:15:19.060 So I'd

00:15:19.440 have let's

00:15:20.060 say a

00:15:20.300 10 year

00:15:20.640 old boy

00:15:21.060 or girl

00:15:21.480 who weighed

00:15:22.300 70 pounds

00:15:23.180 ish

00:15:23.660 leaning with

00:15:25.340 one knee on

00:15:26.620 my back

00:15:27.220 and then

00:15:28.160 I would

00:15:28.400 have my

00:15:29.040 fellow

00:15:29.960 judges

00:15:30.480 I'd have

00:15:32.600 them hold

00:15:32.960 my arms

00:15:33.500 and legs

00:15:34.100 so that I

00:15:35.380 couldn't move

00:15:35.940 and then

00:15:37.000 laying on

00:15:37.780 my stomach

00:15:38.280 with the

00:15:38.740 10 year

00:15:39.100 old boy

00:15:39.560 or girl's

00:15:40.140 knee on

00:15:40.480 my back

00:15:41.040 just one

00:15:41.800 knee

00:15:42.020 not both

00:15:42.640 knees

00:15:42.900 just one

00:15:43.360 knee

00:15:43.540 I would

00:15:44.560 deliver my

00:15:45.180 closing

00:15:45.580 argument

00:15:46.000 and I

00:15:47.480 would make

00:15:47.840 it last

00:15:48.320 30 minutes

00:15:49.160 and I

00:15:51.300 would speak

00:15:51.840 clearly

00:15:52.780 and fluently

00:15:53.540 for 30

00:15:55.240 minutes

00:15:55.680 while under

00:15:56.420 the deadly

00:15:57.260 attack

00:15:57.780 that killed

00:15:59.220 George Floyd

00:15:59.900 and then I

00:16:02.240 would say

00:16:02.540 ladies and 0.98

00:16:03.080 gentlemen

00:16:03.380 I rest

00:16:04.820 my case

00:16:05.360 and then

00:16:08.720 the little

00:16:09.280 girl 0.91

00:16:09.640 or little

00:16:10.520 boy

00:16:10.840 would be

00:16:11.480 would be

00:16:12.640 trained

00:16:13.020 to ask me

00:16:14.100 immediately

00:16:14.540 after I

00:16:15.060 rested my

00:16:15.520 case

00:16:15.840 should I

00:16:16.740 get off

00:16:17.100 your back

00:16:17.480 now

00:16:17.780 and then

00:16:19.140 I would

00:16:19.440 say

00:16:19.720 after I've

00:16:20.340 rested my

00:16:20.840 case

00:16:21.120 but they're

00:16:21.480 still

00:16:21.700 listening

00:16:22.060 I'd say

00:16:22.860 yeah but

00:16:23.620 take your

00:16:23.980 time

00:16:24.300 take your

00:16:26.120 time

00:16:26.420 do you

00:16:30.280 think I

00:16:30.960 couldn't have

00:16:31.400 won that

00:16:31.900 do you

00:16:33.180 think that I

00:16:34.120 could not

00:16:34.520 have won

00:16:34.940 that case

00:16:36.420 of course

00:16:37.660 I could

00:16:38.100 that was

00:16:39.200 the most

00:16:39.480 winnable

00:16:39.880 case

00:16:40.400 I feel

00:16:41.360 like whoever

00:16:41.860 was his

00:16:42.540 lawyer

00:16:42.900 maybe wasn't

00:16:44.120 trying as

00:16:44.740 hard as

00:16:45.100 they could

00:16:45.440 have

00:16:45.680 no way

00:16:46.960 to know

00:16:47.340 but

00:16:47.640 based on

00:16:48.820 the result

00:16:49.320 I have

00:16:49.840 to think

00:16:50.220 maybe

00:16:50.580 somebody

00:16:50.940 didn't

00:16:51.180 try as

00:16:51.580 hard as

00:16:51.900 they could

00:16:52.220 have

00:16:52.460 because I'm

00:16:53.520 pretty sure

00:16:53.940 I could have

00:16:54.260 won that

00:16:54.600 one

00:16:54.800 and I'm

00:16:55.560 not even

00:16:55.920 a lawyer

00:16:56.280 all right

00:16:59.040 so I guess

00:17:02.360 the attorney

00:17:02.780 general in

00:17:03.500 Texas got

00:17:04.720 impeached

00:17:05.420 or he's being

00:17:06.100 impeached

00:17:06.620 Ken Paxton

00:17:08.520 and here's the

00:17:10.360 interesting thing

00:17:11.100 the Republicans

00:17:13.900 he's a

00:17:14.380 Republican

00:17:14.820 and he

00:17:16.320 was a

00:17:16.580 well-known

00:17:16.920 Republican

00:17:17.440 for an

00:17:18.360 attorney

00:17:18.620 general

00:17:18.980 he's

00:17:19.240 somebody's

00:17:19.580 name

00:17:20.100 I've

00:17:20.320 heard

00:17:20.480 for a

00:17:20.760 while

00:17:20.940 so he

00:17:22.160 was

00:17:22.380 prominent

00:17:23.060 and the

00:17:24.460 Republicans

00:17:24.820 just took

00:17:25.360 him out

00:17:25.700 good for

00:17:27.960 you

00:17:28.240 Republicans

00:17:29.880 just took

00:17:30.480 him out

00:17:30.800 they just

00:17:31.620 voted to

00:17:32.020 impeach

00:17:32.320 him

00:17:32.500 now

00:17:33.140 not all

00:17:34.200 the

00:17:34.340 Republicans

00:17:34.800 right

00:17:35.240 I think

00:17:35.580 Trump is

00:17:36.040 still backing

00:17:36.560 him for

00:17:36.900 example

00:17:37.240 but his

00:17:39.440 his offenses

00:17:40.960 were bad

00:17:41.880 enough

00:17:42.300 essentially

00:17:44.480 he's being

00:17:44.900 accused of

00:17:45.680 special favors

00:17:47.000 to a

00:17:47.520 donor

00:17:47.780 and the

00:17:49.480 special favors

00:17:50.160 look pretty

00:17:50.580 bad

00:17:50.920 if the

00:17:53.180 allegations

00:17:53.660 are true

00:17:54.400 he really

00:17:56.440 did need to

00:17:57.080 be impeached

00:17:57.720 no doubt

00:17:58.720 about it

00:17:59.300 so here's

00:18:00.180 what I like

00:18:00.620 about the

00:18:01.020 story

00:18:01.360 Republicans

00:18:03.800 have

00:18:04.300 sort of

00:18:05.860 made a

00:18:06.280 brand for

00:18:06.880 themselves

00:18:07.320 that if

00:18:08.960 needed

00:18:09.320 they will

00:18:09.860 impeach

00:18:10.260 their own

00:18:10.660 president

00:18:11.060 because they

00:18:12.720 correct me

00:18:14.000 if I'm

00:18:14.260 wrong

00:18:14.500 but Nixon

00:18:15.400 got impeached

00:18:16.200 with Republican

00:18:17.160 votes

00:18:17.700 not all of

00:18:19.020 them but

00:18:19.420 Republicans

00:18:20.680 will

00:18:21.160 clean out

00:18:23.400 their own

00:18:23.780 closet

00:18:24.140 and

00:18:26.280 there is

00:18:27.640 some

00:18:28.480 belief

00:18:29.160 that the

00:18:29.700 Democrats

00:18:30.060 won't

00:18:30.740 that there's

00:18:32.100 nothing a

00:18:32.620 Democrat

00:18:32.960 could do

00:18:33.600 that would

00:18:34.300 ever get

00:18:34.760 Democrats

00:18:35.400 to break

00:18:36.820 rank

00:18:37.200 and impeach

00:18:38.500 them

00:18:38.700 now I'd

00:18:40.560 like to

00:18:40.940 think that's

00:18:41.460 not true

00:18:41.960 I'd like to

00:18:43.340 think that if

00:18:44.140 the case

00:18:45.200 were as

00:18:45.860 clear as

00:18:46.580 this Ken

00:18:47.060 Paxton

00:18:47.440 situation

00:18:48.260 looks that

00:18:49.520 they would

00:18:49.820 also act

00:18:50.480 but it

00:18:51.620 does kind

00:18:52.160 of look

00:18:52.440 like the

00:18:53.020 Joe Biden

00:18:53.760 Hunter

00:18:54.120 Biden

00:18:54.420 situation

00:18:54.860 is just

00:18:56.080 as clear

00:18:56.600 as the

00:18:56.940 Ken

00:18:57.160 Paxton

00:18:57.540 situation

00:18:58.200 and if

00:19:01.320 you are

00:19:01.660 a Republican

00:19:02.180 this is a

00:19:02.880 good day

00:19:03.220 for you

00:19:03.600 it feels

00:19:04.580 like a

00:19:04.900 bad day

00:19:05.300 doesn't

00:19:05.580 it

00:19:06.040 because a

00:19:06.400 prominent

00:19:06.720 Republican

00:19:07.260 is being

00:19:08.040 impeached

00:19:08.500 that's bad

00:19:09.240 but honestly

00:19:11.040 I've never

00:19:12.320 respected

00:19:12.860 Republicans

00:19:13.460 more

00:19:13.960 than today

00:19:15.600 that's

00:19:16.660 actually

00:19:16.940 true

00:19:17.280 that's

00:19:18.060 like a

00:19:18.360 literal

00:19:18.580 statement

00:19:19.040 sounds like

00:19:20.040 hyperbole

00:19:20.620 but no

00:19:21.200 that's

00:19:21.460 actually

00:19:21.740 literally

00:19:22.180 true

00:19:22.540 the fact

00:19:23.640 that the

00:19:23.960 Republicans

00:19:24.480 took him

00:19:25.040 out

00:19:25.320 that gives

00:19:27.080 me respect

00:19:27.700 I respect

00:19:28.800 that

00:19:29.100 because that's

00:19:29.760 that's why

00:19:31.040 you hired him

00:19:31.640 right

00:19:32.440 so yes

00:19:34.060 you can be

00:19:34.640 unhappy

00:19:35.100 that the

00:19:35.500 Republicans

00:19:36.000 essentially

00:19:38.120 hired a guy

00:19:39.140 by voting

00:19:39.640 for him

00:19:40.080 that turns

00:19:41.060 out to be

00:19:41.760 a problem

00:19:42.760 that's not

00:19:44.180 good

00:19:44.440 but I've

00:19:45.240 told you

00:19:45.520 before that

00:19:45.980 you should

00:19:46.340 judge people

00:19:47.180 by how

00:19:47.560 they correct

00:19:48.160 their mistakes

00:19:48.900 not by

00:19:50.080 whether they

00:19:50.520 make them

00:19:50.960 if you

00:19:51.760 judge people

00:19:52.300 by making

00:19:52.940 mistakes

00:19:53.520 then we

00:19:54.380 all suck

00:19:54.940 because everybody

00:19:56.140 makes mistakes

00:19:56.920 but we don't

00:19:57.800 all handle

00:19:58.420 our mistakes

00:19:59.000 the same way

00:19:59.720 that's where

00:20:00.360 you really

00:20:00.740 find out

00:20:01.200 who you

00:20:01.520 are

00:20:01.720 and the

00:20:02.500 Republicans

00:20:02.840 have handled

00:20:03.400 their mistake

00:20:04.040 it looks

00:20:04.980 like

00:20:05.260 so good

00:20:06.240 for them

00:20:06.580 if things

00:20:08.800 go the way

00:20:09.240 it looks

00:20:09.500 like it'll

00:20:09.840 go

00:20:10.020 I'd also

00:20:11.900 hasten to

00:20:12.520 say that

00:20:12.900 Paxton

00:20:13.220 is innocent

00:20:14.100 until proven

00:20:15.400 guilty

00:20:15.820 he's innocent

00:20:17.820 until proven

00:20:18.380 guilty

00:20:18.720 but there are

00:20:20.660 some pretty

00:20:21.020 bad allegations

00:20:21.860 well here

00:20:25.460 is a big

00:20:26.060 surprise

00:20:26.580 I don't

00:20:27.540 know who

00:20:27.860 saw this

00:20:28.320 coming

00:20:28.640 but can

00:20:29.760 you believe

00:20:30.340 that at

00:20:30.840 the last

00:20:31.380 minute

00:20:31.780 the

00:20:32.840 Congress

00:20:33.420 made a

00:20:33.920 debt ceiling

00:20:34.480 deal

00:20:34.940 I mean

00:20:36.640 who saw

00:20:37.620 that coming

00:20:38.240 everybody

00:20:40.240 who's ever

00:20:40.860 paid attention

00:20:41.480 saw that

00:20:41.940 coming

00:20:42.200 right

00:20:42.560 yeah

00:20:43.500 so

00:20:44.400 you know

00:20:46.000 I've been

00:20:46.260 explaining to

00:20:46.980 you or

00:20:47.440 really

00:20:47.840 explaining

00:20:49.320 myself

00:20:49.820 for a few

00:20:51.020 weeks

00:20:51.400 you know

00:20:52.140 why am I

00:20:52.600 not talking

00:20:53.140 about the

00:20:53.500 debt ceiling

00:20:54.060 negotiation

00:20:54.740 it's the

00:20:55.740 end of the

00:20:56.080 world

00:20:56.360 and I kept

00:20:57.440 saying

00:20:57.800 there's nothing

00:20:59.500 to talk about

00:21:00.200 until the last

00:21:00.900 ten minutes

00:21:01.520 the entire

00:21:02.760 story is the

00:21:03.620 last ten minutes

00:21:04.560 there's no

00:21:05.580 story until the

00:21:06.380 last ten minutes

00:21:07.240 so everybody

00:21:09.120 was saying

00:21:09.480 talk about the

00:21:10.120 story and I

00:21:10.740 kept saying

00:21:11.120 there is no

00:21:11.560 story

00:21:11.860 there's nothing

00:21:12.960 to talk about

00:21:13.740 until the last

00:21:15.000 ten minutes

00:21:15.520 because the

00:21:16.320 last ten

00:21:16.840 minutes

00:21:17.260 not literally

00:21:19.700 ten minutes

00:21:20.240 but the

00:21:20.980 last ten

00:21:21.760 minutes or

00:21:22.180 so

00:21:22.540 is when

00:21:23.540 both sides

00:21:24.120 look at

00:21:24.480 their most

00:21:24.860 recent polling

00:21:25.660 and they

00:21:26.900 know who's

00:21:27.480 in the

00:21:27.760 weaker

00:21:27.980 position

00:21:28.460 and then

00:21:30.320 the weaker

00:21:30.800 position has

00:21:31.460 to give

00:21:31.760 something up

00:21:32.380 and then

00:21:33.340 you get a

00:21:33.700 deal

00:21:33.880 because the

00:21:34.880 last thing

00:21:35.540 anybody wants

00:21:36.160 is to not

00:21:36.660 have a deal

00:21:37.160 so just

00:21:39.380 as it

00:21:40.540 should have

00:21:40.920 gone

00:21:41.380 it's the

00:21:41.860 last minute

00:21:42.420 we don't

00:21:43.180 know all

00:21:43.480 the details

00:21:44.100 there's

00:21:46.720 something in

00:21:47.160 there about

00:21:47.780 student loans

00:21:50.500 but I don't

00:21:52.260 think we know

00:21:52.760 the details

00:21:53.300 of that

00:21:53.780 so we'll

00:21:55.860 wait to

00:21:56.420 judge whether

00:21:57.020 it's a good

00:21:57.480 or bad

00:21:57.780 deal

00:21:58.040 well no

00:21:59.080 I take it

00:21:59.580 back

00:21:59.820 we don't

00:22:00.580 have to

00:22:00.940 wait to

00:22:01.640 know if

00:22:02.000 it's a

00:22:02.280 good or

00:22:02.600 bad deal

00:22:03.140 am I

00:22:03.820 right

00:22:04.040 it's a

00:22:05.380 bad deal

00:22:06.080 the reason

00:22:08.780 that you

00:22:09.080 can reach a

00:22:09.540 deal at

00:22:09.900 all

00:22:10.200 is because

00:22:11.420 both sides

00:22:12.260 accepted less

00:22:13.180 than they

00:22:13.460 wanted

00:22:13.760 right

00:22:14.660 so

00:22:15.900 somebody says

00:22:17.460 no deal

00:22:18.040 they haven't

00:22:20.520 turned it

00:22:20.880 down since

00:22:21.600 I started

00:22:22.040 talking

00:22:22.440 I think

00:22:24.160 it's looking

00:22:24.660 like a

00:22:25.120 deal but

00:22:25.620 I wouldn't

00:22:26.780 be surprised

00:22:27.540 if there's

00:22:28.820 a last

00:22:29.260 one minute

00:22:30.100 twist

00:22:30.520 right

00:22:31.360 so the

00:22:31.680 last ten

00:22:32.180 minutes is

00:22:32.640 when you

00:22:32.880 get the

00:22:33.160 verbal

00:22:33.440 agreement

00:22:34.000 but then

00:22:35.380 the last

00:22:35.760 one minute

00:22:36.360 somebody like

00:22:37.000 Matt Gates

00:22:37.560 might emerge

00:22:38.760 and say

00:22:39.720 ah

00:22:40.160 now you

00:22:40.800 only got

00:22:41.120 one minute

00:22:41.800 and it

00:22:42.820 looks like

00:22:43.160 the polling

00:22:43.600 would be

00:22:44.000 bad for

00:22:44.560 Democrats

00:22:45.160 one minute

00:22:46.600 to go

00:22:47.100 well

00:22:47.720 you know

00:22:48.400 I'd sure

00:22:49.060 like to

00:22:49.480 give you

00:22:50.100 to give

00:22:50.380 me this

00:22:50.740 thing

00:22:51.040 no we

00:22:52.280 don't want

00:22:52.540 to give

00:22:52.760 you this

00:22:53.040 thing

00:22:53.200 we already

00:22:53.820 negotiated

00:22:54.480 the

00:22:55.180 negotiation's

00:22:55.960 over

00:22:56.200 oh is

00:22:56.940 it

00:22:57.160 is it

00:22:57.900 well let's

00:22:58.580 wait for a

00:22:59.080 minute

00:22:59.260 and see how

00:22:59.700 you feel

00:23:00.080 no damn

00:23:01.020 it

00:23:01.240 all right

00:23:02.200 you can

00:23:02.500 have it

00:23:02.940 so it

00:23:04.880 might be

00:23:05.400 that there's

00:23:06.120 still that

00:23:06.580 last minute

00:23:07.260 one minute

00:23:07.960 flurry

00:23:08.500 but it's

00:23:09.460 still going

00:23:09.780 to get

00:23:10.020 done

00:23:10.280 it still

00:23:11.820 will get

00:23:12.240 done

00:23:12.500 all right

00:23:14.440 are you

00:23:15.780 following this

00:23:16.280 drama with

00:23:16.840 the Babylon

00:23:17.340 Bee

00:23:17.800 of all

00:23:19.780 things to

00:23:20.260 have a

00:23:20.480 drama

00:23:20.780 so the

00:23:22.500 founder

00:23:23.000 I guess

00:23:24.360 would be

00:23:24.940 the CEO

00:23:25.460 Seth

00:23:25.880 Dillon

00:23:26.200 he fired

00:23:27.780 one of his

00:23:28.360 writers on

00:23:29.020 Twitter

00:23:29.280 so the

00:23:30.780 guy tweeted

00:23:31.640 a profanity

00:23:32.800 at

00:23:33.140 some

00:23:34.700 was it

00:23:35.760 Christina

00:23:36.440 Puschaw

00:23:38.160 or somebody

00:23:38.640 so some

00:23:39.740 Republican

00:23:40.920 person I

00:23:41.560 guess

00:23:41.720 so he

00:23:43.980 so one

00:23:45.500 of the

00:23:45.760 people who

00:23:46.140 writes for

00:23:46.480 the Bee

00:23:46.760 and had

00:23:48.460 that in

00:23:48.960 his bio

00:23:49.540 tweeted

00:23:50.660 a profanity

00:23:51.340 which Seth

00:23:52.140 Dillon saw

00:23:52.760 and basically

00:23:54.220 fired him

00:23:54.940 in public

00:23:55.340 on Twitter

00:23:56.640 now you

00:23:58.520 might say

00:23:58.900 to yourself

00:23:59.260 well good

00:24:00.560 for him

00:24:01.080 he's got

00:24:02.380 a standard

00:24:02.940 and he's

00:24:04.460 keeping up

00:24:05.280 his standard

00:24:05.820 but the

00:24:07.580 embarrassing

00:24:08.060 part is that

00:24:08.800 Seth

00:24:09.220 Dillon who

00:24:09.700 fired his

00:24:10.360 guy for

00:24:10.880 saying what

00:24:12.260 he said

00:24:12.720 in 2020

00:24:13.620 had tweeted

00:24:14.280 if you're

00:24:15.540 afraid you

00:24:16.020 might get

00:24:16.380 fired for

00:24:17.000 speaking your

00:24:17.620 mind

00:24:17.980 the solution

00:24:18.980 is to

00:24:19.460 speak your

00:24:19.940 mind

00:24:20.240 anyway

00:24:20.660 if no

00:24:21.560 one is

00:24:21.840 willing to

00:24:22.240 take that

00:24:22.660 risk

00:24:23.020 nothing is

00:24:23.920 going to

00:24:24.280 change

00:24:24.680 and so

00:24:26.200 that his

00:24:26.600 own writer

00:24:27.140 spoke his

00:24:28.320 mind

00:24:28.660 and they

00:24:29.360 got fired

00:24:29.920 now

00:24:31.240 to support

00:24:33.380 Seth

00:24:34.080 Dillon

00:24:34.440 I want to

00:24:35.520 make sure

00:24:35.820 his side

00:24:36.280 is represented

00:24:36.920 he didn't

00:24:38.020 say that

00:24:38.400 that person

00:24:38.860 shouldn't

00:24:39.280 be fired

00:24:39.800 he said

00:24:40.840 the opposite

00:24:41.300 he said

00:24:42.360 you're going

00:24:42.660 to get

00:24:42.860 fired

00:24:43.200 if you use

00:24:44.680 free speech

00:24:45.160 you're going

00:24:45.440 to get

00:24:45.620 fired

00:24:45.860 but do

00:24:46.180 it anyway

00:24:46.600 so his

00:24:48.720 writer

00:24:48.980 did it

00:24:49.380 anyway

00:24:49.740 he got

00:24:51.300 fired

00:24:51.600 now I'm

00:24:53.420 not even

00:24:53.740 sure if

00:24:54.060 there's any

00:24:54.500 you know

00:24:56.140 any big

00:24:56.520 crime here

00:24:57.160 because the

00:24:59.180 reason he got

00:24:59.760 fired is that

00:25:00.540 he wasn't

00:25:01.160 representing the

00:25:01.940 company the

00:25:02.500 way they

00:25:02.760 wanted to be

00:25:03.160 represented

00:25:03.680 everybody has

00:25:06.620 that right

00:25:07.080 right

00:25:07.560 that's the

00:25:08.020 employer's

00:25:08.520 choice

00:25:08.840 so

00:25:10.380 I don't

00:25:12.600 know

00:25:12.680 there's not

00:25:13.040 much of a

00:25:13.480 story there

00:25:14.000 I guess the

00:25:14.940 big story is

00:25:15.580 that it

00:25:15.820 happened on

00:25:16.260 Twitter

00:25:16.520 instead of

00:25:17.040 happening

00:25:17.320 privately

00:25:17.760 but either

00:25:20.240 way it got

00:25:20.640 a lot of

00:25:21.000 publicity for

00:25:21.620 the B

00:25:21.920 we'll see

00:25:23.340 what happens

00:25:23.800 there

00:25:24.040 all right

00:25:25.320 I saw

00:25:25.840 so now

00:25:26.540 that the

00:25:27.020 I think

00:25:28.020 all of the

00:25:28.640 Republican

00:25:29.140 candidates

00:25:29.720 for president

00:25:30.680 are in

00:25:33.560 favor of

00:25:33.960 using the

00:25:34.360 U.S.

00:25:34.700 military to

00:25:35.280 go after

00:25:35.540 the cartels

00:25:36.220 now

00:25:37.460 the pushback

00:25:39.160 I see in

00:25:39.700 this

00:25:39.980 isn't good

00:25:41.700 meaning that

00:25:43.440 it's not

00:25:43.940 well thought

00:25:44.460 out

00:25:44.760 so let's

00:25:45.560 give you a

00:25:45.960 little detail

00:25:46.460 when people

00:25:47.680 say they

00:25:48.340 will use

00:25:48.640 the military

00:25:49.200 to attack

00:25:49.800 the cartels

00:25:50.600 you have to

00:25:51.780 understand that

00:25:52.420 nobody's in

00:25:53.300 favor of

00:25:53.840 attacking the

00:25:55.400 military of

00:25:56.420 Mexico

00:25:57.000 you all know

00:25:58.980 that right

00:25:59.460 nobody's going

00:26:00.540 to try to

00:26:00.940 take over

00:26:01.320 their capital

00:26:01.880 building

00:26:02.320 the only way

00:26:03.900 we would use

00:26:04.440 the military

00:26:05.320 in Mexico

00:26:05.840 is if we

00:26:07.140 told them

00:26:07.760 to get out

00:26:08.400 of the way

00:26:08.780 we'd say

00:26:10.780 look we've

00:26:11.360 identified these

00:26:12.140 operations

00:26:12.740 just make

00:26:13.960 sure you

00:26:14.260 don't have

00:26:14.560 any civilians

00:26:15.660 or military

00:26:16.560 people there

00:26:17.240 and we'll

00:26:18.140 take care of

00:26:18.660 it

00:26:18.840 and then

00:26:19.160 Mexico

00:26:19.520 will say

00:26:20.160 hey we're

00:26:21.320 a sovereign

00:26:21.720 country

00:26:22.200 that would

00:26:22.620 be an

00:26:22.900 act of

00:26:23.280 war

00:26:23.540 you can't

00:26:24.700 you can't

00:26:25.260 use any

00:26:25.620 military in

00:26:26.200 our country

00:26:26.640 because we

00:26:27.780 would have

00:26:28.040 to treat

00:26:28.360 that as

00:26:28.800 an act

00:26:29.180 of war

00:26:29.600 then what

00:26:30.980 would we

00:26:31.380 do

00:26:31.640 well in

00:26:32.860 the past

00:26:33.280 we would

00:26:33.580 say oh

00:26:33.900 I guess

00:26:34.260 we can't

00:26:34.600 do that

00:26:35.060 but there

00:26:36.680 are six

00:26:37.080 Republicans

00:26:37.580 who said

00:26:38.180 we're going

00:26:38.540 to do it

00:26:38.780 anyway

00:26:39.080 we're not

00:26:40.620 asking for

00:26:41.240 permission

00:26:41.720 we're

00:26:42.840 warning you

00:26:43.360 to get

00:26:43.600 out of

00:26:43.840 the way

00:26:44.160 and to

00:26:46.080 me that's

00:26:46.480 the only

00:26:46.740 way to

00:26:47.020 play it

00:26:47.460 because you'd

00:26:48.780 want you'd

00:26:49.440 want the 0.55

00:26:49.760 Mexican

00:26:50.140 government to

00:26:50.860 have the

00:26:51.140 cover that

00:26:52.400 they didn't

00:26:52.780 have a

00:26:53.080 choice

00:26:53.440 right

00:26:54.600 because I

00:26:55.140 think the

00:26:55.460 Mexican

00:26:55.820 public would

00:26:56.640 understand

00:26:57.240 I think

00:26:58.540 they would

00:26:58.880 totally

00:26:59.180 understand

00:26:59.720 oh

00:27:00.360 our

00:27:01.120 government

00:27:01.460 was not

00:27:01.940 given the

00:27:02.360 option

00:27:02.660 and we

00:27:04.620 understand

00:27:05.140 why it

00:27:05.500 happened

00:27:05.780 I feel

00:27:07.100 like we

00:27:07.440 wouldn't

00:27:07.640 even have

00:27:07.980 much of a

00:27:08.400 public

00:27:08.780 problem in

00:27:10.100 Mexico

00:27:10.480 now would

00:27:12.180 innocent

00:27:12.640 people get

00:27:13.240 killed

00:27:13.580 probably

00:27:14.400 probably

00:27:15.840 but we

00:27:17.520 could give

00:27:17.940 warning on

00:27:18.720 any locations

00:27:19.920 and people

00:27:20.640 I mean we

00:27:21.200 could say

00:27:21.600 we could give

00:27:22.740 them plenty

00:27:23.100 warnings

00:27:23.560 here's our

00:27:24.180 target list

00:27:24.920 if you're

00:27:25.940 anywhere within

00:27:26.760 you know

00:27:27.320 100 yards

00:27:27.980 of these

00:27:28.320 people

00:27:28.660 there's going

00:27:29.220 to be some

00:27:29.620 blowing up

00:27:30.200 happening

00:27:30.560 right

00:27:31.760 I wouldn't

00:27:32.980 I wouldn't

00:27:33.400 be within

00:27:33.800 100 yards

00:27:34.640 of any of

00:27:35.260 the people

00:27:35.600 on this

00:27:35.980 list

00:27:36.380 and I

00:27:37.140 wouldn't

00:27:37.380 be within

00:27:37.900 one mile

00:27:38.780 of any

00:27:39.980 of these

00:27:40.320 facilities

00:27:40.940 and just

00:27:42.760 give them

00:27:43.380 give them

00:27:44.180 the hit list

00:27:44.740 then

00:27:46.980 you negotiate

00:27:48.360 with the

00:27:48.840 cartels

00:27:49.340 I wouldn't

00:27:50.940 fire a

00:27:51.420 single bullet

00:27:52.120 until I

00:27:53.640 gave them

00:27:54.220 their target

00:27:54.760 list

00:27:55.160 told them

00:27:56.240 exactly

00:27:56.700 what's

00:27:57.020 going to

00:27:57.220 happen

00:27:57.520 told Mexico 0.90

00:27:58.840 it doesn't

00:27:59.380 matter what

00:27:59.800 they think

00:28:00.200 about this

00:28:00.660 idea

00:28:01.020 and then I

00:28:02.620 would ask

00:28:03.220 for the

00:28:03.520 heads of

00:28:03.800 the cartels

00:28:04.380 to contact

00:28:05.020 me and I

00:28:05.560 would start

00:28:05.840 talking to

00:28:06.340 them

00:28:06.660 because there

00:28:07.440 might be a

00:28:08.580 way to

00:28:08.980 work something

00:28:09.880 out

00:28:10.100 I'll tell you

00:28:11.740 my rose

00:28:12.620 colored glasses

00:28:13.380 perfect world

00:28:14.380 I don't think

00:28:15.780 it's possible

00:28:16.420 but I like to

00:28:18.200 think about it

00:28:18.960 make a deal

00:28:20.500 to the heads

00:28:21.340 of the cartels

00:28:22.000 or even maybe

00:28:22.960 just one

00:28:23.480 the strongest

00:28:24.180 one

00:28:24.480 and you

00:28:26.380 say

00:28:26.680 we are

00:28:27.700 desirous

00:28:28.460 of moving

00:28:29.920 a lot of

00:28:30.480 manufacturing

00:28:31.180 out of

00:28:31.600 China

00:28:31.900 and into

00:28:33.360 something

00:28:33.720 closer

00:28:34.200 like Mexico

00:28:35.680 if you

00:28:37.920 give up

00:28:38.320 the drug

00:28:38.720 trade

00:28:39.140 and you

00:28:41.700 know

00:28:41.820 help us

00:28:42.200 close it

00:28:42.640 down

00:28:42.940 we'll give

00:28:43.960 you equity

00:28:44.660 in some

00:28:46.520 of the

00:28:46.780 build up

00:28:47.240 but you

00:28:47.940 have to

00:28:48.200 be a

00:28:48.440 contributing

00:28:48.880 partner

00:28:49.400 in other

00:28:50.260 words

00:28:50.420 you have

00:28:50.680 to

00:28:50.900 let's say

00:28:51.800 turn your

00:28:52.580 military

00:28:53.620 into a

00:28:54.240 security

00:28:54.820 force

00:28:55.240 or

00:28:56.420 somehow

00:28:57.140 you have

00:28:57.700 to

00:28:57.880 contribute

00:28:58.560 in some

00:28:59.880 legal way

00:29:00.520 and it

00:29:02.120 might be

00:29:02.440 just to

00:29:02.960 reduce the

00:29:03.860 amount of

00:29:04.200 crime

00:29:04.620 so that the

00:29:05.620 people who

00:29:06.000 want to

00:29:06.260 work at

00:29:06.600 these

00:29:06.780 companies

00:29:07.160 are safe

00:29:08.000 and I

00:29:09.040 would say

00:29:09.460 this will

00:29:10.200 be your

00:29:10.600 one and

00:29:11.160 only chance

00:29:11.880 to allow

00:29:13.680 your children

00:29:14.260 to have a

00:29:14.840 good life

00:29:15.400 with money

00:29:16.320 and with

00:29:17.100 reputation

00:29:17.680 going forward

00:29:18.980 if you

00:29:20.040 say no

00:29:20.580 to this

00:29:20.920 offer

00:29:21.240 where we'll

00:29:22.000 try to

00:29:22.820 turn you

00:29:23.240 into some

00:29:23.700 legal entity

00:29:24.960 we will

00:29:26.440 kill all

00:29:26.940 of you

00:29:27.240 and you'll

00:29:28.660 never get

00:29:29.100 this offer

00:29:29.540 again

00:29:29.860 I'd try

00:29:31.640 it

00:29:31.920 now like

00:29:33.580 you say

00:29:33.960 if you put

00:29:34.580 the cartel

00:29:35.180 in charge

00:29:35.640 of security

00:29:36.260 the security

00:29:38.940 people will

00:29:39.440 be the ones

00:29:39.860 robbing stuff

00:29:40.580 I get it

00:29:42.560 I get it

00:29:43.700 I just think

00:29:44.520 there might be

00:29:45.000 some way

00:29:45.860 there might

00:29:46.880 be some

00:29:47.400 way to

00:29:47.780 give them

00:29:48.140 some sense

00:29:48.800 of ownership

00:29:49.320 without giving

00:29:51.040 them control

00:29:52.080 of doing

00:29:52.660 anything illegal

00:29:53.380 maybe

00:29:54.720 remember

00:29:56.020 every action

00:29:57.800 you do down

00:29:58.440 there is

00:29:58.760 going to be

00:29:59.080 suboptimal

00:29:59.720 there's nothing

00:30:00.760 you can do

00:30:01.340 where it just

00:30:01.960 works and

00:30:02.500 there's no

00:30:02.840 downside

00:30:03.360 so everything

00:30:04.460 you do

00:30:04.840 has got a

00:30:05.180 big risk

00:30:05.760 no exceptions

00:30:07.260 yeah

00:30:08.640 well like

00:30:09.220 okay that's

00:30:10.100 a good example

00:30:10.600 the hell's

00:30:11.460 angels

00:30:11.860 were sometimes

00:30:14.020 hired to

00:30:14.620 do security

00:30:15.600 at rock

00:30:17.340 shows

00:30:17.700 but that

00:30:19.680 can go bad

00:30:20.380 really quickly

00:30:21.080 that can go

00:30:22.800 bad really

00:30:23.460 quickly

00:30:23.800 like Altamont

00:30:25.100 however

00:30:28.320 imagine this

00:30:30.020 imagine if

00:30:31.140 the cartels

00:30:31.980 were part of

00:30:33.420 the security

00:30:33.840 force

00:30:34.280 but there

00:30:35.740 was somebody

00:30:36.240 some non

00:30:37.180 cartel

00:30:37.700 well everybody

00:30:38.700 becomes the

00:30:39.260 cartel

00:30:39.620 eventually

00:30:40.080 I don't know

00:30:41.420 I'll have to

00:30:41.760 think about it

00:30:42.220 a little more

00:30:42.640 but I think

00:30:43.300 there's probably

00:30:44.080 some

00:30:44.660 long shot

00:30:45.940 way to

00:30:46.460 turn the

00:30:47.880 cartels

00:30:48.280 into a

00:30:48.680 positive

00:30:48.980 force

00:30:49.380 now the

00:30:50.320 reason I

00:30:50.620 say that

00:30:51.040 is

00:30:51.280 you

00:30:51.780 remember

00:30:52.560 that

00:30:52.960 early

00:30:53.740 America

00:30:54.260 was

00:30:55.840 dominated

00:30:56.660 by robber

00:30:57.460 barons

00:30:57.960 they were

00:31:00.040 the cartel

00:31:00.640 of their

00:31:00.900 time

00:31:01.240 America

00:31:02.380 had its

00:31:02.760 own

00:31:02.940 cartel

00:31:03.440 the

00:31:03.980 billionaire

00:31:04.440 well

00:31:05.040 millionaire

00:31:05.680 robber

00:31:06.580 barons

00:31:07.000 you know

00:31:07.300 the built

00:31:07.640 transcontinental

00:31:09.240 railroad

00:31:09.720 and all that

00:31:10.140 they were

00:31:10.800 bad dudes

00:31:11.740 they were

00:31:12.840 bad bad

00:31:13.860 people

00:31:14.280 really bad

00:31:15.580 people

00:31:15.920 do you think

00:31:16.680 they killed

00:31:17.100 people

00:31:17.480 probably

00:31:18.540 probably

00:31:20.080 yeah

00:31:20.800 or worked

00:31:21.480 them to

00:31:21.760 death

00:31:22.040 had slaves

00:31:23.400 working on

00:31:23.880 the railroad

00:31:24.560 yeah

00:31:25.460 yep

00:31:26.080 all that

00:31:26.600 but if you

00:31:27.880 looked at

00:31:28.200 those family

00:31:28.800 names

00:31:29.340 today

00:31:29.940 they all

00:31:31.620 made so

00:31:32.120 much money

00:31:32.580 that they

00:31:33.000 could

00:31:33.240 they had

00:31:33.860 the luxury

00:31:34.540 of doing

00:31:35.100 legal things

00:31:35.920 eventually

00:31:36.320 so

00:31:37.780 yeah

00:31:38.720 they became

00:31:39.500 legitimate

00:31:40.040 you know

00:31:41.460 philanthropists

00:31:43.640 and stuff

00:31:44.000 like that

00:31:44.400 all right

00:31:46.100 I know that

00:31:46.640 stuff because

00:31:47.040 I used to

00:31:47.400 work at

00:31:47.740 Crocker

00:31:48.160 National Bank

00:31:48.900 and Crocker

00:31:49.640 was one of

00:31:50.620 the robber

00:31:51.660 barons

00:31:52.140 and whenever

00:31:53.260 I worked

00:31:53.640 for the

00:31:53.900 bank

00:31:54.180 it was just

00:31:54.640 the weirdest

00:31:55.080 thing

00:31:55.440 because the

00:31:56.600 bank itself

00:31:57.280 was really

00:31:58.160 really honest

00:31:58.960 it was a

00:32:00.320 bank

00:32:00.640 Wells Fargo

00:32:01.820 bought them

00:32:02.420 eventually

00:32:02.780 now banks

00:32:03.780 do some

00:32:04.200 some sketchy

00:32:04.920 stuff but

00:32:05.340 we're not

00:32:05.640 talking

00:32:05.980 cartel

00:32:07.100 robber

00:32:07.740 baron

00:32:08.080 level

00:32:08.340 stuff

00:32:08.780 it's more

00:32:09.700 administrative

00:32:10.420 weaselly

00:32:11.300 stuff

00:32:11.660 but we

00:32:13.440 have an

00:32:13.700 example

00:32:14.080 of

00:32:14.600 effectively

00:32:15.920 the

00:32:16.260 American

00:32:16.580 cartel

00:32:17.140 was

00:32:17.500 legalized

00:32:18.500 and

00:32:18.740 brought

00:32:19.800 into

00:32:20.080 the

00:32:20.260 fold

00:32:20.560 all right

00:32:22.860 here's a

00:32:23.300 I don't

00:32:23.600 know if

00:32:23.820 this is

00:32:24.120 a trend

00:32:24.600 there's

00:32:25.720 something

00:32:25.920 called

00:32:26.400 sologamy

00:32:27.900 the first

00:32:29.940 part is

00:32:30.300 solo

00:32:30.700 meaning

00:32:31.600 women 1.00

00:32:32.000 marrying

00:32:32.520 themselves

00:32:33.200 literally

00:32:34.400 having a

00:32:34.980 wedding

00:32:35.220 and having

00:32:36.660 a wedding

00:32:37.000 ceremony

00:32:37.520 in which

00:32:37.980 they celebrate

00:32:38.740 their self

00:32:39.540 love

00:32:39.940 you can

00:32:42.200 use your

00:32:42.520 imagination

00:32:42.920 of what

00:32:43.460 that honeymoon

00:32:43.960 looks like

00:32:44.620 I think

00:32:46.260 I'll take a

00:32:46.740 moment to

00:32:47.120 imagine it

00:32:47.980 yeah

00:32:49.680 yeah

00:32:51.300 all right

00:32:52.540 I'm done

00:32:52.940 and I

00:32:56.760 this looks

00:32:57.820 like more

00:32:58.260 of a just

00:32:58.800 a funny

00:32:59.260 story as

00:33:00.500 opposed to

00:33:01.040 a big

00:33:01.320 old trend

00:33:01.860 but there

00:33:02.360 are CNN

00:33:03.480 men found

00:33:03.940 several

00:33:04.340 people to

00:33:04.840 talk to

00:33:05.240 who had

00:33:06.320 done just

00:33:06.800 this

00:33:07.100 now what

00:33:08.980 you would

00:33:09.320 think is

00:33:09.720 an unrelated

00:33:10.360 story but

00:33:11.300 maybe not

00:33:12.760 there's a

00:33:14.580 big question

00:33:15.120 of what has

00:33:15.680 caused a

00:33:16.300 continuous drop

00:33:17.380 in testosterone

00:33:19.460 and also

00:33:20.420 sperm levels

00:33:21.440 in men

00:33:21.960 over recent

00:33:24.300 years

00:33:24.700 well it's been

00:33:25.600 happening for a

00:33:26.120 long time

00:33:26.580 but it just

00:33:27.440 gets worse

00:33:27.860 every year

00:33:28.260 and here's

00:33:30.080 the thing

00:33:30.420 that nobody

00:33:30.980 mentions

00:33:31.560 right now

00:33:32.840 in my

00:33:33.200 opinion

00:33:33.540 the most

00:33:34.980 logical

00:33:35.580 culprit

00:33:38.000 is either

00:33:39.480 diet

00:33:40.020 diet

00:33:41.760 big pharma

00:33:42.900 lifestyle

00:33:44.700 you know

00:33:45.460 everything from

00:33:46.100 not getting

00:33:46.920 enough sleep

00:33:47.460 to looking

00:33:47.840 at screens

00:33:48.400 I see

00:33:49.500 somebody saying

00:33:50.040 plastic

00:33:50.580 I'll generalize

00:33:51.660 plastic

00:33:52.280 to environmental

00:33:54.020 pollution

00:33:55.160 right

00:33:56.160 so I don't

00:33:56.800 know about

00:33:57.160 plastic in

00:33:57.960 particular

00:33:58.360 but I will

00:33:59.380 say that

00:33:59.920 pollution

00:34:00.660 almost certainly

00:34:01.680 has some

00:34:02.160 effect

00:34:02.500 you know

00:34:03.320 because you

00:34:04.060 can imagine

00:34:04.520 it would

00:34:04.800 degrade your

00:34:05.500 overall health

00:34:06.820 yeah maybe

00:34:07.600 it's soy

00:34:08.280 I don't know

00:34:08.780 something about

00:34:09.340 the food

00:34:10.380 quality

00:34:10.780 but the one

00:34:11.900 thing that

00:34:12.380 nobody says

00:34:13.180 out loud

00:34:13.620 because they're

00:34:14.120 not as

00:34:14.520 cancelled as

00:34:15.140 I am

00:34:15.460 I'm cancelled

00:34:17.340 enough to

00:34:17.820 say this

00:34:18.380 we know

00:34:20.580 for sure

00:34:21.140 that men's

00:34:22.180 testosterone

00:34:22.720 drops when

00:34:23.840 they're around

00:34:24.320 children

00:34:24.820 you know that

00:34:25.680 right

00:34:25.980 unless they're

00:34:26.640 pedos

00:34:27.000 I guess

00:34:27.380 if you're

00:34:28.600 like a

00:34:29.020 you know

00:34:29.800 an average

00:34:30.640 person

00:34:31.100 average male

00:34:31.880 and you

00:34:32.900 spend time

00:34:33.420 around children

00:34:34.000 your testosterone

00:34:34.780 just drops

00:34:35.480 immediately

00:34:36.420 probably your

00:34:38.600 sperm production

00:34:39.340 probably

00:34:40.660 right

00:34:41.600 makes sense

00:34:42.180 so we know

00:34:43.000 that men

00:34:43.560 are very

00:34:44.580 influenced

00:34:45.260 by the

00:34:45.820 environment

00:34:46.340 now if a

00:34:47.720 man wins

00:34:48.260 a competition

00:34:49.100 science says

00:34:51.860 their testosterone

00:34:52.580 goes up

00:34:53.320 because they

00:34:54.580 won

00:34:54.800 if they lose

00:34:55.800 it goes down

00:34:56.420 now what

00:34:58.160 do you think

00:34:58.480 happens to

00:34:58.900 a man's

00:34:59.420 sperm

00:35:00.000 production

00:35:00.560 and testosterone

00:35:01.660 when he's

00:35:02.420 around a

00:35:03.140 woman who 0.99

00:35:04.040 he's attracted

00:35:04.820 to

00:35:05.080 do you

00:35:06.180 imagine it

00:35:06.640 goes up

00:35:07.120 I mean if

00:35:08.740 it goes down

00:35:09.420 when you're

00:35:09.840 around kids

00:35:10.540 because that's

00:35:11.040 sort of a

00:35:11.440 damper on

00:35:12.040 all that

00:35:12.620 I would

00:35:13.920 imagine that

00:35:14.460 if he's

00:35:14.720 around an

00:35:15.160 attractive woman 0.99

00:35:15.920 who shows

00:35:16.420 interest in

00:35:17.000 him

00:35:17.160 I would

00:35:18.540 imagine that

00:35:19.000 would go

00:35:19.260 up

00:35:19.540 now look

00:35:20.860 at

00:35:21.060 feminism

00:35:21.680 feminism

00:35:23.680 and I'm

00:35:24.420 not going

00:35:24.700 to say

00:35:24.920 that it's

00:35:25.240 bad or

00:35:25.640 good

00:35:25.920 I'm just

00:35:26.300 going to

00:35:26.520 describe it

00:35:27.240 so this

00:35:27.980 is not

00:35:28.300 a

00:35:28.500 criticism

00:35:29.120 just an

00:35:30.220 observation

00:35:30.660 the point

00:35:32.140 of feminism

00:35:32.780 see if this

00:35:34.560 framing is

00:35:35.240 wrong

00:35:35.840 the point

00:35:36.700 of feminism

00:35:37.280 is that

00:35:37.780 women in 0.62

00:35:38.280 general

00:35:38.640 wanted to

00:35:40.000 move from

00:35:40.500 a place

00:35:40.980 where they

00:35:41.420 were presenting

00:35:42.000 themselves

00:35:42.580 as men

00:35:43.920 wanted them

00:35:44.580 to present

00:35:45.140 themselves

00:35:45.780 to presenting

00:35:47.220 themselves

00:35:47.660 as women

00:35:48.280 wanted to

00:35:48.740 present

00:35:49.000 themselves

00:35:49.600 is that

00:35:50.580 wrong

00:35:50.880 would you

00:35:52.400 say that

00:35:52.720 frame is

00:35:53.180 accurate

00:35:53.560 that it

00:35:54.940 was more

00:35:55.240 about less

00:35:55.780 about giving

00:35:56.360 men what

00:35:56.840 they wanted

00:35:57.360 and I'm

00:35:58.820 not saying

00:35:59.180 that's good

00:35:59.620 or bad

00:36:00.040 it's a free

00:36:01.060 world

00:36:01.440 and more

00:36:02.940 about what

00:36:03.380 women wanted 0.99

00:36:04.060 which is a

00:36:05.780 little different

00:36:06.160 now what would

00:36:07.900 be the logical

00:36:08.600 outcome of

00:36:09.180 that

00:36:09.500 the logical

00:36:11.120 outcome of

00:36:11.960 women putting 0.92

00:36:13.300 less effort

00:36:14.000 into making

00:36:14.660 men want 0.97

00:36:16.480 them and

00:36:17.580 more effort

00:36:18.140 into making

00:36:19.000 men

00:36:19.520 irrelevant

00:36:20.360 how would

00:36:22.280 men respond

00:36:23.120 biologically

00:36:23.880 and physically

00:36:24.540 well it

00:36:25.640 should knock

00:36:26.120 the hell

00:36:26.440 out of

00:36:26.740 your

00:36:26.980 testosterone

00:36:27.740 and I

00:36:29.080 would imagine

00:36:29.520 your sperm 0.74

00:36:30.100 production

00:36:30.500 follows along

00:36:31.340 with that

00:36:31.760 because if

00:36:33.220 you see

00:36:33.500 somebody you

00:36:33.920 don't want

00:36:34.480 to mate

00:36:34.780 with

00:36:35.160 does your

00:36:36.700 sperm

00:36:37.000 production

00:36:37.380 go up

00:36:37.980 and

00:36:41.260 and

00:36:42.020 yeah

00:36:43.540 so

00:36:46.140 it's one

00:36:46.900 of the

00:36:47.080 things that

00:36:47.480 nobody can

00:36:48.000 mention

00:36:48.420 right

00:36:49.100 now what

00:36:50.300 about

00:36:50.640 birth

00:36:51.400 control

00:36:51.840 I think

00:36:54.280 women's

00:36:54.960 birth

00:36:55.200 control

00:36:55.700 is one

00:36:56.540 of the

00:36:56.740 reasons

00:36:57.040 that men's

00:36:57.780 sperm

00:36:58.140 production

00:36:58.620 went down

00:36:59.160 just a

00:37:00.260 hypothesis

00:37:00.780 but it's a

00:37:01.740 pretty good

00:37:02.100 one

00:37:02.360 because

00:37:03.480 I believe

00:37:05.020 that

00:37:05.420 birth

00:37:06.460 control

00:37:06.860 makes

00:37:07.220 women 1.00

00:37:07.600 less

00:37:08.100 attractive

00:37:08.580 to men

00:37:09.080 I think

00:37:10.240 the science

00:37:10.780 supports

00:37:11.800 that

00:37:12.060 and

00:37:12.980 then it

00:37:13.240 would have

00:37:13.440 the same

00:37:13.820 impact

00:37:14.380 now

00:37:17.080 everybody's

00:37:17.540 different

00:37:17.840 so that

00:37:18.380 doesn't

00:37:18.640 mean

00:37:18.880 any

00:37:19.240 individual

00:37:19.960 is having

00:37:20.600 any of

00:37:20.900 these

00:37:21.060 effects

00:37:21.460 but just

00:37:22.240 an average

00:37:22.680 now

00:37:23.520 like I

00:37:26.200 said

00:37:26.360 I still

00:37:26.780 think

00:37:27.040 the most

00:37:27.820 the biggest

00:37:28.760 impact

00:37:29.180 is probably

00:37:29.620 the food

00:37:30.040 supply

00:37:30.500 and we're

00:37:31.440 getting fat

00:37:31.960 and unhealthy

00:37:32.400 but I

00:37:34.720 don't know

00:37:35.480 why we

00:37:35.780 can't say

00:37:36.200 that out

00:37:36.620 loud

00:37:36.960 why can't

00:37:38.140 we say

00:37:38.500 out loud

00:37:39.060 I'm

00:37:40.620 perfectly

00:37:41.040 in favor

00:37:41.580 of women

00:37:42.140 pursuing

00:37:42.680 their own

00:37:43.500 happiness

00:37:43.940 they can

00:37:44.840 call it

00:37:45.180 feminism

00:37:45.640 or anything

00:37:46.080 else

00:37:46.360 it's a

00:37:46.660 free

00:37:46.820 country

00:37:47.200 and adults

00:37:48.460 can do

00:37:48.900 what they

00:37:49.240 want

00:37:49.660 be they

00:37:50.820 hetero

00:37:51.380 or be

00:37:52.300 they not

00:37:52.860 right

00:37:54.260 so

00:37:55.180 I don't

00:37:57.320 know

00:37:57.460 I think

00:37:57.760 we ought

00:37:57.980 to be

00:37:58.140 able to

00:37:58.340 talk

00:37:58.540 about it

00:37:59.400 all right

00:38:01.440 there's a

00:38:03.420 health club

00:38:04.020 chain called

00:38:04.600 Equinox

00:38:05.280 and there's

00:38:07.500 a story

00:38:07.920 about them

00:38:08.480 firing

00:38:08.980 they fired

00:38:10.000 a black

00:38:10.440 woman 0.99

00:38:10.760 who had

00:38:11.760 been late

00:38:12.420 47 times

00:38:14.380 in 10

00:38:14.800 months

00:38:15.160 she sued

00:38:17.000 them for

00:38:17.620 racial

00:38:19.120 discrimination

00:38:19.720 and she

00:38:20.440 won

00:38:20.740 11.25

00:38:21.660 million

00:38:22.100 in damages

00:38:22.880 and

00:38:24.860 but

00:38:26.660 twitter

00:38:28.180 context

00:38:29.020 notes

00:38:29.460 added some

00:38:30.580 context

00:38:31.080 and it

00:38:31.580 said

00:38:31.760 hold on

00:38:32.900 hold on

00:38:33.540 there's

00:38:34.180 context

00:38:34.660 to this

00:38:35.080 the reason

00:38:36.260 she won

00:38:36.840 is because

00:38:38.200 there were

00:38:38.740 lots of

00:38:39.180 examples

00:38:39.560 of white

00:38:40.360 employees

00:38:40.860 who were

00:38:41.680 also late

00:38:42.460 a lot

00:38:43.040 and did

00:38:43.800 not get

00:38:44.260 the same

00:38:44.740 treatment

00:38:45.100 so therefore

00:38:47.040 she won

00:38:47.520 now

00:38:48.780 since we

00:38:50.100 were not

00:38:50.480 on the

00:38:50.740 trial

00:38:51.060 and we

00:38:51.500 were not

00:38:51.840 privy to

00:38:52.420 all of

00:38:52.740 the evidence

00:38:53.220 of the

00:38:53.440 trial

00:38:53.660 I don't

00:38:53.980 think we

00:38:54.300 can

00:38:54.460 second

00:38:54.760 guess

00:38:55.100 it

00:38:55.360 because

00:38:56.400 if you

00:38:56.900 ask me

00:38:57.460 that's a

00:38:58.460 pretty good

00:38:58.880 defense

00:38:59.360 if it

00:39:01.360 turned out

00:39:01.760 that there

00:39:02.080 were comparable

00:39:02.840 late white

00:39:03.860 employees

00:39:04.340 and no

00:39:04.940 repercussions

00:39:05.900 it's a

00:39:07.620 pretty good

00:39:08.160 pretty good

00:39:08.940 case

00:39:09.360 however

00:39:11.240 I would

00:39:12.260 like to

00:39:12.600 point out

00:39:12.960 the following

00:39:13.460 let's say

00:39:14.820 Equinox

00:39:15.460 hired 10

00:39:16.360 employees

00:39:16.980 and all

00:39:18.740 10 of

00:39:19.120 them were

00:39:19.460 late all

00:39:19.960 the time

00:39:20.420 nine of

00:39:21.680 them were

00:39:22.000 white

00:39:22.380 just for a

00:39:23.400 mental

00:39:23.660 experiment

00:39:24.140 here

00:39:24.400 one of

00:39:25.080 them is

00:39:25.420 black

00:39:25.820 which

00:39:27.280 one

00:39:27.620 gives

00:39:28.240 them

00:39:28.440 the

00:39:28.640 most

00:39:28.920 risk

00:39:29.540 10

00:39:30.920 people

00:39:31.260 they're

00:39:31.500 all

00:39:31.680 late

00:39:31.960 the

00:39:32.220 same

00:39:32.420 amount

00:39:32.780 nine

00:39:33.700 of

00:39:33.820 them

00:39:33.920 are

00:39:34.040 white

00:39:34.260 one

00:39:34.500 of

00:39:34.600 them

00:39:34.740 is

00:39:34.840 black

00:39:35.200 well

00:39:36.520 if you

00:39:36.900 were

00:39:37.020 to

00:39:37.140 if you

00:39:37.500 chose 0.56

00:39:37.880 to

00:39:38.240 fire

00:39:38.720 first

00:39:39.380 any

00:39:39.900 one

00:39:40.140 of

00:39:40.260 the

00:39:40.380 white

00:39:40.580 people

00:39:40.940 do

00:39:41.800 you

00:39:41.920 think

00:39:42.100 you

00:39:42.260 would

00:39:42.400 be

00:39:42.520 fired

00:39:42.920 for

00:39:43.200 racial

00:39:43.800 discrimination

00:39:44.480 if

00:39:45.360 the

00:39:45.520 first

00:39:45.840 one

00:39:46.020 you

00:39:46.120 fired

00:39:46.340 was

00:39:46.540 white

00:39:46.880 no

00:39:47.940 no

00:39:48.920 nobody

00:39:49.360 would

00:39:49.520 even

00:39:49.680 think

00:39:49.900 of

00:39:50.000 it

00:39:50.180 but

00:39:51.080 if

00:39:51.220 the

00:39:51.360 first

00:39:51.620 one

00:39:51.800 you

00:39:51.920 decided

00:39:55.820 for

00:39:56.040 and

00:39:56.440 losing

00:39:56.840 11.25

00:39:57.880 million

00:39:58.320 dollars

00:39:58.800 very

00:39:59.900 high

00:40:00.320 very

00:40:01.840 high

00:40:02.200 so

00:40:03.440 the

00:40:03.680 company

00:40:04.080 loses

00:40:05.140 the

00:40:05.400 ability

00:40:05.780 if

00:40:06.940 they

00:40:07.380 thought

00:40:07.700 that

00:40:07.940 the

00:40:08.200 one

00:40:08.540 employee

00:40:08.980 was

00:40:09.420 really

00:40:09.840 worse

00:40:10.260 than

00:40:10.480 the

00:40:10.620 others

00:40:10.880 and

00:40:11.500 that's

00:40:11.740 where

00:40:11.880 they

00:40:12.020 wanted

00:40:12.200 to

00:40:12.420 start

00:40:12.740 you

00:40:13.360 know

00:40:13.460 perhaps

00:40:13.820 they

00:40:14.000 were

00:40:14.120 going

00:40:14.240 to

00:40:14.320 fire

00:40:14.880 some

00:40:15.120 of

00:40:15.220 those

00:40:15.360 other

00:40:15.560 people

00:40:15.800 too

00:40:16.040 maybe

00:40:16.780 they

00:40:16.940 were

00:40:17.020 going

00:40:17.120 to

00:40:17.200 make

00:40:17.380 an

00:40:18.040 example

00:40:18.480 on

00:40:18.700 one

00:40:18.920 of

00:40:19.040 them

00:40:19.200 and

00:40:20.140 hope

00:40:20.380 that

00:40:20.580 that

00:40:20.840 caused

00:40:21.500 the

00:40:21.660 rest

00:40:21.860 of

00:40:21.980 them

00:40:22.140 to

00:40:22.340 be

00:40:25.820 but

00:40:26.120 you

00:40:26.900 cannot

00:40:27.200 look

00:40:27.540 at

00:40:27.660 these

00:40:27.880 situations

00:40:28.380 as

00:40:28.720 equal

00:40:29.100 risk

00:40:29.640 this

00:40:31.220 is

00:40:31.400 not

00:40:31.620 equal

00:40:31.940 risk

00:40:32.400 that

00:40:33.100 company

00:40:33.520 had

00:40:33.800 a

00:40:34.040 much

00:40:34.520 bigger

00:40:34.960 risk

00:40:35.440 with

00:40:35.960 that

00:40:36.120 one

00:40:36.340 black

00:40:36.640 employee

00:40:37.100 than

00:40:38.020 they

00:40:38.180 did

00:40:38.380 with

00:40:38.600 all

00:40:38.880 of

00:40:39.020 the

00:40:39.140 white

00:40:39.340 employees

00:40:39.800 who

00:40:40.080 apparently

00:40:40.640 were

00:40:40.860 terrible

00:40:41.240 as

00:40:41.500 well

00:40:41.780 they

00:40:42.700 hired

00:40:43.220 a lot

00:40:43.460 of

00:40:43.580 terrible

00:40:43.880 employees

00:40:44.380 apparently

00:40:44.780 which

00:40:46.640 is

00:40:46.900 not

00:40:47.420 that

00:40:47.660 strange

00:40:48.040 for

00:40:48.200 that

00:40:48.340 kind

00:40:48.540 of

00:40:48.620 business

00:40:48.960 right

00:40:50.800 now

00:40:51.460 here's

00:40:51.800 my

00:40:52.140 provocative

00:40:53.020 question

00:40:53.600 do you

00:40:55.480 think

00:40:55.700 Equinox

00:40:56.340 will

00:40:57.120 get

00:40:57.380 more

00:40:57.880 signups

00:40:58.540 or

00:40:59.000 fewer

00:40:59.460 because

00:41:01.180 we saw

00:41:01.580 Bud Light

00:41:02.180 we saw

00:41:02.920 Target

00:41:03.300 they lost

00:41:04.140 30 billion

00:41:04.840 collectively

00:41:05.440 in equity

00:41:06.400 because

00:41:08.160 conservatives

00:41:08.800 said

00:41:09.320 we're going

00:41:10.000 to act

00:41:10.340 on that

00:41:10.780 do you

00:41:11.960 think

00:41:12.160 conservatives

00:41:12.740 are going

00:41:13.060 to read

00:41:13.280 this story

00:41:13.720 and say

00:41:14.120 I'm going

00:41:14.860 to join

00:41:15.160 Equinox

00:41:15.760 just

00:41:16.800 as an

00:41:17.500 FU

00:41:17.800 to the

00:41:18.120 system

00:41:18.480 not

00:41:19.560 necessarily

00:41:20.220 because

00:41:20.480 they think

00:41:20.880 it's going

00:41:21.440 to be

00:41:21.560 a bastion

00:41:22.060 of white

00:41:22.720 people

00:41:23.000 or something

00:41:23.320 like that

00:41:23.800 but rather

00:41:24.700 just to

00:41:25.380 support

00:41:25.720 them

00:41:26.020 because

00:41:26.980 it doesn't

00:41:28.220 look like

00:41:28.900 on the

00:41:29.900 surface

00:41:30.320 that this

00:41:32.560 was necessarily

00:41:33.500 a fair

00:41:34.440 result

00:41:34.900 because

00:41:36.520 somebody

00:41:37.600 had to

00:41:38.060 get fired

00:41:38.620 first

00:41:39.180 and I

00:41:40.840 do

00:41:41.060 understand

00:41:41.900 it's a

00:41:43.620 little bit

00:41:43.900 sketchy

00:41:44.500 it's a

00:41:44.880 little bit

00:41:45.140 suspicious

00:41:45.680 that the

00:41:46.980 black

00:41:47.220 employee

00:41:47.620 got fired

00:41:48.180 first

00:41:48.620 but that's

00:41:50.900 how coincidence

00:41:51.520 works

00:41:52.120 whichever

00:41:53.660 one of

00:41:54.080 them

00:41:54.200 got fired

00:41:54.720 first

00:41:55.140 if somebody

00:41:55.600 was going

00:41:55.900 to get

00:41:56.080 fired

00:41:56.360 it was

00:41:57.860 going to

00:41:58.040 be

00:41:58.160 somebody

00:41:58.600 so

00:42:01.060 we don't

00:42:02.840 know exactly

00:42:03.340 what happened

00:42:03.780 but the real

00:42:04.240 question is

00:42:04.760 will conservatives

00:42:05.720 interpret this

00:42:06.680 situation

00:42:07.220 as a reason

00:42:08.460 to sign up

00:42:09.140 for Equinox

00:42:09.860 what was your

00:42:11.520 feeling as I

00:42:12.500 told you about

00:42:13.040 the story

00:42:13.520 did you have

00:42:15.320 any feeling

00:42:16.000 like oh

00:42:16.540 shoot

00:42:16.960 I think I

00:42:18.380 want to

00:42:18.640 support that

00:42:19.140 company

00:42:19.520 or is it

00:42:22.200 just no it's

00:42:22.880 just a story

00:42:23.380 about a

00:42:23.680 company

00:42:23.980 all right so

00:42:26.240 it looks like

00:42:26.740 it produces

00:42:27.320 no the story

00:42:28.180 produces no

00:42:29.040 energy right

00:42:29.840 yeah none

00:42:31.280 of you are

00:42:31.700 interested in

00:42:32.260 supporting Equinox

00:42:33.160 I see

00:42:33.500 all right

00:42:34.600 good to

00:42:35.600 know

00:42:35.860 good to

00:42:36.800 know

00:42:37.080 all right

00:42:40.140 and that

00:42:45.740 ladies and 0.98

00:42:46.260 gentlemen

00:42:46.540 here's my

00:42:49.500 prepared

00:42:49.940 comments on

00:42:51.180 this

00:42:51.480 Sunday

00:42:52.820 that's going

00:42:53.300 to be a

00:42:53.660 kind of a

00:42:54.680 sleepy Sunday

00:42:55.440 if you're

00:42:57.320 wondering what

00:42:57.840 topics are in

00:42:59.380 the Dilbert

00:43:00.000 Reborn comic

00:43:00.880 that you can't

00:43:02.000 see unless

00:43:02.500 you're a

00:43:02.840 subscriber to

00:43:03.460 Locals or

00:43:04.680 you can subscribe

00:43:05.360 to it now

00:43:05.960 on Twitter

00:43:06.560 and for a

00:43:07.840 lower cost

00:43:08.440 you get just

00:43:09.060 the Dilbert

00:43:09.640 comic only

00:43:10.240 so Dilbert of

00:43:13.320 course is

00:43:13.840 dealing with

00:43:14.420 his you got

00:43:15.460 an AI sex 0.64

00:43:16.260 bot but

00:43:17.760 he ordered

00:43:18.100 the Karen

00:43:18.520 3000 that

00:43:19.420 didn't work

00:43:19.840 out

00:43:20.080 we also

00:43:23.500 have the

00:43:24.840 character Dave

00:43:25.980 Dave the

00:43:26.820 engineer

00:43:27.260 now Dave the

00:43:28.560 engineer is a

00:43:29.260 new character

00:43:29.860 he's black

00:43:30.800 and he's an

00:43:32.020 engineer who

00:43:32.960 works at

00:43:33.360 Dilbert's

00:43:33.720 company and

00:43:35.340 his character

00:43:36.800 is that he's

00:43:37.540 a prankster

00:43:38.120 so whenever

00:43:41.060 he's talking

00:43:41.500 about the

00:43:41.900 woke stuff

00:43:42.540 he's usually

00:43:43.220 joking to

00:43:43.940 make people

00:43:44.360 uncomfortable

00:43:44.860 but the

00:43:46.900 pointy air

00:43:47.420 boss will

00:43:47.980 put Dave

00:43:49.040 in charge

00:43:49.540 of their

00:43:49.940 DEI

00:43:50.600 program

00:43:51.600 so if

00:43:52.880 you want

00:43:53.100 to see

00:43:53.320 Dave the

00:43:53.720 engineer

00:43:54.140 in charge

00:43:54.900 of Dilbert's

00:43:56.400 DEI

00:43:57.240 and let's

00:43:59.540 just say

00:43:59.960 that Dave

00:44:00.940 being a

00:44:01.540 prankster

00:44:02.000 his idea

00:44:03.660 of how to

00:44:04.180 increase

00:44:04.700 diversity

00:44:05.520 is not

00:44:06.940 what that

00:44:07.280 boss had

00:44:07.780 in mind

00:44:08.180 so that's

00:44:08.900 your teaser

00:44:09.280 also in

00:44:12.460 Dilbert

00:44:12.740 upcoming

00:44:13.600 Dilbert's

00:44:15.160 CEO

00:44:15.740 will be

00:44:17.220 asked to

00:44:17.780 testify about

00:44:18.800 the dangers

00:44:19.380 of AI

00:44:20.000 so they're

00:44:22.620 going to be

00:44:22.900 testifying about

00:44:23.620 the dangers

00:44:24.180 of AI to

00:44:24.820 Congress

00:44:25.260 it doesn't

00:44:28.100 go well

00:44:28.540 it doesn't

00:44:29.500 go well

00:44:30.240 so

00:44:32.920 Euro

00:44:34.920 Digital

00:44:35.360 Services

00:44:35.920 Act

00:44:36.300 threatening

00:44:38.220 Twitter

00:44:38.660 I need to

00:44:39.180 know more

00:44:39.640 about that

00:44:40.280 yeah Europe

00:44:41.600 seems to be

00:44:42.440 a little

00:44:43.240 difficult to

00:44:44.280 navigate

00:44:44.660 boy I didn't

00:44:47.300 realize that

00:44:47.800 Twitter would

00:44:48.320 become such a

00:44:49.020 target

00:44:49.420 for trying

00:44:54.900 to be

00:44:55.340 balanced

00:44:56.040 but it

00:44:58.880 doesn't look

00:44:59.300 balanced if

00:45:00.020 you were

00:45:00.420 left wing

00:45:01.280 talk more

00:45:04.500 about AI

00:45:05.120 I think

00:45:07.740 you don't

00:45:08.100 really want

00:45:08.560 that do

00:45:08.880 what's up

00:45:11.600 with the

00:45:11.880 price of

00:45:12.520 gas

00:45:13.040 is the

00:45:14.260 price of

00:45:14.580 gas up

00:45:15.020 or down

00:45:15.420 it looks

00:45:15.920 like you've

00:45:16.280 been

00:45:16.480 slowly

00:45:17.620 slowly

00:45:18.800 reducing

00:45:19.400 oh it's

00:45:19.880 up

00:45:20.120 did it

00:45:21.700 go up

00:45:21.940 today

00:45:22.260 all right

00:45:29.040 Nvidia

00:45:31.320 stock

00:45:31.880 oh boy

00:45:33.180 do I

00:45:33.400 wish I

00:45:33.720 had some

00:45:34.040 Nvidia

00:45:34.460 stock

00:45:34.960 so Nvidia

00:45:35.940 stock

00:45:36.400 because I

00:45:36.960 guess they

00:45:37.280 have a

00:45:37.640 chip that

00:45:38.120 works well

00:45:38.580 with AI

00:45:39.040 that

00:45:40.340 that

00:45:41.940 does

00:45:42.140 stock

00:45:42.420 is to

00:45:42.700 the roof

00:45:43.000 it's like

00:45:43.340 one of the

00:45:43.700 most valuable

00:45:44.200 companies in

00:45:45.000 the country

00:45:45.940 now

00:45:46.200 it's

00:45:47.600 gigantic

00:45:48.060 now

00:45:48.360 did I

00:45:58.980 get my

00:45:59.360 shirt at

00:45:59.800 Walmart

00:46:00.120 I did

00:46:01.600 not

00:46:01.960 it's a

00:46:04.540 fresh

00:46:05.020 clean tea

00:46:05.840 that's the

00:46:07.260 name of the

00:46:07.560 company

00:46:07.840 yeah so

00:46:11.520 Katie Hobbs

00:46:12.240 vetoed

00:46:13.220 some

00:46:14.180 Republican

00:46:14.880 led

00:46:15.340 election

00:46:16.380 reform

00:46:16.960 stuff

00:46:17.400 but

00:46:18.640 I read

00:46:19.560 her

00:46:19.740 arguments

00:46:20.340 they

00:46:21.000 weren't

00:46:21.220 terrible

00:46:21.640 but it

00:46:23.320 did look

00:46:23.780 still like

00:46:24.420 it was a

00:46:25.340 Democrat

00:46:25.760 versus

00:46:26.180 Republican

00:46:26.780 thing

00:46:27.120 yeah

00:46:31.000 I mean

00:46:31.540 obviously

00:46:32.260 she was

00:46:34.120 voting for

00:46:34.540 her team

00:46:35.000 I don't

00:46:35.320 think she

00:46:35.620 was looking

00:46:35.920 out for

00:46:36.160 the state

00:46:36.640 do you

00:46:43.340 wash

00:46:43.660 your

00:46:43.840 t-shirts

00:46:44.380 before you

00:46:45.020 wear them

00:46:45.440 the first

00:46:45.860 time

00:46:46.200 let me

00:46:46.920 put that

00:46:47.260 question

00:46:47.620 to you

00:46:48.060 do you

00:46:50.600 wash

00:46:50.980 your

00:46:51.200 clothes

00:46:51.620 before you

00:46:52.200 wear them

00:46:52.640 the first

00:46:53.060 time

00:46:53.360 let's

00:46:56.260 say it

00:46:56.480 was in

00:46:56.700 a package

00:46:57.220 so nobody

00:46:57.820 nobody tried

00:46:58.540 it on

00:46:58.860 in the

00:46:59.100 store

00:46:59.360 it's

00:46:59.820 in the

00:47:00.020 package

00:47:00.380 well you're

00:47:04.340 quite mixed

00:47:04.860 on this

00:47:05.240 lots of

00:47:05.660 no's

00:47:05.900 and yes's

00:47:06.460 my guess

00:47:11.140 is that

00:47:11.800 it's probably

00:47:12.200 cleaner coming

00:47:13.100 out of the

00:47:13.500 package than

00:47:14.160 it is coming

00:47:14.640 out of your

00:47:14.980 washing machine

00:47:15.600 your wife

00:47:18.680 does overhear

00:47:19.340 objections

00:47:19.780 yeah

00:47:21.440 my answer

00:47:24.940 to the

00:47:25.220 question is

00:47:25.960 it depends

00:47:27.360 so I

00:47:29.040 would wash

00:47:29.740 it first

00:47:30.300 if it

00:47:31.300 were

00:47:31.480 wrinkly

00:47:31.940 and I

00:47:33.380 would wash

00:47:34.080 it first

00:47:34.540 if I

00:47:34.940 bought it

00:47:35.300 a little

00:47:35.580 large

00:47:36.100 because I

00:47:36.660 expected it

00:47:37.360 to shrink

00:47:37.880 but if

00:47:39.600 it were

00:47:39.840 exactly the

00:47:40.440 right size

00:47:41.060 and had

00:47:41.700 no wrinkles

00:47:42.300 let's say

00:47:43.300 a t-shirt

00:47:43.980 that you're

00:47:44.320 taking out

00:47:44.700 of a

00:47:44.980 package

00:47:45.300 for the

00:47:45.680 first time

00:47:46.160 I would

00:47:47.200 wear it

00:47:47.580 without

00:47:47.780 washing it

00:47:48.900 special

00:47:50.420 case

00:47:50.820 I wouldn't

00:47:52.160 wear a

00:47:53.220 pair of

00:47:53.560 pants

00:47:54.080 that I

00:47:57.220 bought

00:47:57.420 at a

00:47:57.660 store

00:47:57.840 because you

00:47:58.440 wonder how

00:47:58.840 many people

00:47:59.240 have had

00:47:59.480 those

00:47:59.660 pants

00:47:59.940 on

00:48:00.160 wash

00:48:02.400 it all

00:48:02.720 all right

00:48:04.220 here's

00:48:04.600 another one

00:48:05.060 how many

00:48:05.860 of you

00:48:06.220 would wash

00:48:07.020 let's say

00:48:08.360 spinach or

00:48:09.220 lettuce

00:48:09.660 that came

00:48:10.920 in a package

00:48:11.580 that said

00:48:12.120 it was

00:48:12.380 pre-washed

00:48:13.120 how many

00:48:14.280 of you

00:48:14.600 wash

00:48:15.160 pre-washed

00:48:16.720 salad

00:48:18.280 a lot

00:48:19.840 of people

00:48:20.140 wash

00:48:20.540 pre-washed

00:48:21.180 salad

00:48:21.560 but a lot

00:48:23.520 of people

00:48:23.780 don't

00:48:24.160 I used

00:48:26.440 to

00:48:26.700 or

00:48:27.940 or

00:48:27.960 what

00:48:28.600 what

00:48:28.620 about

00:48:28.840 what

00:48:29.120 if

00:48:29.240 it

00:48:29.420 doesn't

00:48:29.880 say

00:48:30.080 it's

00:48:30.240 pre-washed

00:48:30.880 but it's

00:48:31.340 obvious

00:48:31.640 that it

00:48:31.960 was

00:48:32.260 suppose

00:48:33.200 it's

00:48:33.440 not

00:48:33.700 labeled

00:48:34.060 pre-washed

00:48:34.840 but you

00:48:35.240 can just

00:48:35.540 look at

00:48:35.980 it

00:48:36.120 it's

00:48:36.620 obvious

00:48:36.940 that it

00:48:37.240 was

00:48:37.540 you

00:48:39.340 wash

00:48:39.600 it

00:48:39.720 then

00:48:39.980 well you

00:48:43.100 keep in

00:48:43.520 mind

00:48:43.680 when you

00:48:44.020 when you

00:48:44.560 wash

00:48:44.980 it

00:48:45.200 you're

00:48:45.920 probably

00:48:46.140 just

00:48:46.360 do it

00:48:46.660 with

00:48:46.860 cold

00:48:47.180 water

00:48:47.600 right

00:48:48.060 it's

00:48:48.640 not like

00:48:48.940 you're

00:48:49.100 washing

00:48:49.340 it

00:48:49.480 with

00:48:49.620 soap

00:48:49.960 I'm

00:48:50.840 not

00:48:50.980 sure

00:48:51.140 how much

00:48:51.440 that

00:48:51.620 cold

00:48:51.900 water

00:48:52.160 makes

00:48:52.440 a

00:48:52.560 difference

00:48:52.900 you put

00:48:56.260 vinegar

00:48:56.620 in it

00:48:56.980 to crisp

00:48:57.460 it

00:48:57.720 I've

00:48:58.540 never

00:48:58.700 heard

00:48:58.880 of

00:48:58.980 that

00:48:59.240 is

00:49:00.660 that

00:49:00.800 a

00:49:00.920 thing

00:49:01.160 you

00:49:01.720 put

00:49:02.020 vinegar

00:49:02.720 in

00:49:02.920 your

00:49:03.060 cold

00:49:03.340 water

00:49:03.640 to

00:49:03.940 crisp

00:49:05.060 up

00:49:05.280 your

00:49:05.440 salad

00:49:05.800 I'll

00:49:09.060 be

00:49:09.180 damned

00:49:09.460 white

00:49:10.940 vinegar

00:49:11.300 well I

00:49:12.660 learned

00:49:12.920 something

00:49:13.200 there

00:49:13.460 look at

00:49:14.360 me

00:49:14.560 learning

00:49:15.540 stuff

00:49:16.000 all right

00:49:17.140 I've

00:49:17.660 probably

00:49:17.840 told you

00:49:18.180 this

00:49:18.340 before

00:49:18.700 but I

00:49:19.520 once

00:49:19.880 I dated

00:49:20.940 a chef

00:49:21.560 so it

00:49:22.880 was a

00:49:23.080 woman who 0.99

00:49:23.540 knew what

00:49:24.520 she was

00:49:24.760 talking about

00:49:25.300 food wise

00:49:26.140 and actually

00:49:27.440 I've dated

00:49:27.780 two chefs

00:49:28.380 that's weird

00:49:28.940 I've dated

00:49:30.380 two professional

00:49:31.620 chefs

00:49:32.060 never realized

00:49:33.220 that before

00:49:33.620 until just

00:49:34.060 now

00:49:34.280 but

00:49:35.360 neither

00:49:36.540 of them

00:49:36.900 washed

00:49:37.380 anything

00:49:37.920 that came

00:49:38.320 in the

00:49:38.520 package

00:49:39.180 if it

00:49:39.700 came

00:49:39.840 in the

00:49:40.040 package

00:49:40.480 it was

00:49:41.180 clean

00:49:41.460 that was

00:49:42.700 their

00:49:42.860 standard

00:49:43.260 I have

00:49:46.880 a type

00:49:47.280 no it

00:49:52.900 wasn't

00:49:53.300 it wasn't

00:49:54.100 when I

00:49:54.400 owned the

00:49:54.740 restaurant

00:49:55.060 it was

00:49:55.300 actually

00:49:55.600 unrelated

00:49:56.080 to my

00:49:56.640 restaurant

00:49:57.060 we never

00:49:58.500 we never

00:49:59.180 had a

00:49:59.660 female 0.86

00:50:00.120 chef

00:50:00.580 at my

00:50:02.520 restaurants

00:50:02.980 not that

00:50:04.240 we didn't

00:50:04.560 want one

00:50:05.000 just

00:50:05.600 unapplied

00:50:06.460 washing

00:50:16.240 adds

00:50:16.700 to

00:50:16.920 labor

00:50:17.180 costs

00:50:17.640 that

00:50:17.940 is

00:50:18.080 correct

00:50:18.560 all right

00:50:24.160 with salad

00:50:27.980 after eating

00:50:28.420 with

00:50:28.640 hydroxychloroquine

00:50:29.720 I had

00:50:33.320 two

00:50:33.540 restaurants

00:50:34.000 for a

00:50:34.300 while

00:50:34.540 do you

00:50:37.360 wash

00:50:37.640 chicken

00:50:38.120 with

00:50:38.420 soap

00:50:38.740 I

00:50:40.040 stopped

00:50:40.440 eating

00:50:40.720 chicken

00:50:41.080 so I

00:50:41.440 solved

00:50:42.040 that

00:50:42.220 problem

00:50:42.560 so I'm

00:50:52.440 going to

00:50:52.600 tell you

00:50:52.920 something else

00:50:53.520 about

00:50:53.800 equinox

00:50:54.540 but I

00:50:55.400 can't tell

00:50:55.820 you on

00:50:56.100 YouTube

00:50:56.480 so after

00:50:58.540 I turn

00:50:59.160 off YouTube

00:50:59.600 I'll tell

00:51:00.040 the locals

00:51:00.540 people a

00:51:01.240 little

00:51:01.480 behind the

00:51:03.340 curtains

00:51:03.600 information

00:51:04.280 that will

00:51:06.760 change

00:51:07.120 how you

00:51:08.040 think about

00:51:08.440 that story

00:51:09.000 all right

00:51:11.120 YouTube

00:51:11.520 thanks for

00:51:12.120 joining

00:51:12.380 and we'll

00:51:13.560 see you

00:51:13.940 tomorrow

00:51:14.340 and I'm

00:51:16.480 going to

00:51:16.640 go talk

00:51:16.960 to the

00:51:17.160 locals

00:51:17.400 people

00:51:17.700 now

00:51:18.080 and thanks

00:51:19.320 for joining

00:51:19.680 to the

00:51:25.080 you

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - May 28, 2023

Episode 2122 Scott Adams： Too-On-The-Nose Rule For Spotting Fake News Would Have Changed Everything

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript