Real Coffee with Scott Adams - May 29, 2023


Episode 2123 Scott Adams: Kari Lake Update, Depression, Replacing Teachers, AI To Spot Fake News?


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 4 minutes

Words per minute

142.11101

Word count

9,115

Sentence count

665

Harmful content

Misogyny

11

sentences flagged

Toxicity

40

sentences flagged

Hate speech

20

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

A family adopted a girl from Ukraine, but they think she's an adult pretending to be a six-year-old girl. Is it possible she's actually an adult masquerading as a kid? And if so, what does that mean for the rest of the family?

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Do-do-do-do-do-do-do.
00:00:03.000 Good morning, everybody.
00:00:05.100 And it's Memorial Day.
00:00:07.860 And if you'd like to take a moment of silence on your end,
00:00:11.600 okay, that's good.
00:00:12.920 That's all you need for now.
00:00:14.400 We don't want to spend it all on the first thing in the morning.
00:00:17.540 You want to take lots of moments of silence during the day.
00:00:21.080 Now, if you'd like your Memorial Day to be the most special and,
00:00:26.220 oh, let's say, respectful one ever,
00:00:28.660 there's something you need that you haven't done yet.
00:00:32.060 And all you need is a cuppa, a mug, or a glass,
00:00:33.940 a tankard chalice, or a stein, a canteen joke, or a flask,
00:00:37.180 a vessel of any kind.
00:00:40.060 Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine of the day,
00:00:43.200 the thing that makes everything better.
00:00:44.680 This one's for our fallen soldiers for Memorial Day.
00:00:50.500 It happens now.
00:00:51.800 Go.
00:00:55.980 Ah.
00:00:58.660 Delightful.
00:01:01.660 All right.
00:01:04.720 In no particular order,
00:01:07.000 my favorite story of the day was the family
00:01:09.880 that claims they adopted a six-year-old daughter,
00:01:14.260 or thought they did.
00:01:15.000 They thought they were adopting a six-year-old girl from Ukraine,
00:01:18.560 but they believe they got an adult
00:01:21.220 who's pretending to be a six-year-old girl.
00:01:23.700 That's not the interesting part.
00:01:27.440 The interesting part is that this person
00:01:30.720 that they believe is an adult pretending to be a six-year-old,
00:01:34.920 but other people aren't so sure,
00:01:36.980 she might actually be a kid, 0.99
00:01:38.980 but she's also trying to kill them. 1.00
00:01:41.920 Yeah. 0.98
00:01:42.120 On several occasions, 0.97
00:01:43.040 she tried to poison them and stab them 1.00
00:01:44.920 and trick the kids into running into traffic. 0.99
00:01:47.400 So she's a murderous,
00:01:51.020 potentially adult, 0.79
00:01:53.040 pretending to be a six-year-old
00:01:54.700 that got adopted from Ukraine.
00:01:59.200 Now,
00:01:59.880 if you were going to try to make an analogy
00:02:03.120 of the Ukraine war
00:02:05.600 and our involvement in it,
00:02:08.980 could you come up with anything
00:02:10.240 that would be better
00:02:11.100 than the six-year-old girl
00:02:13.120 who might be an adult
00:02:14.980 who might be trying to kill
00:02:16.580 every member of the family?
00:02:20.560 I'm just saying
00:02:21.540 that sometimes the reality
00:02:24.380 hands you a gift of an analogy
00:02:27.140 that's so perfect
00:02:28.120 you don't have to add anything to it.
00:02:31.020 Now, part of the story is that
00:02:32.420 if the person is an adult
00:02:35.340 masquerading as a child,
00:02:37.800 then it's because
00:02:40.300 there's some kind of dwarfism,
00:02:42.640 disease involved,
00:02:43.960 or condition,
00:02:44.680 I don't know what you call it.
00:02:46.360 But if it's an adult,
00:02:48.340 it's not a very high-functioning one.
00:02:51.240 And if it's a child,
00:02:52.420 it's weirdly advanced in some ways,
00:02:56.100 such as sexually.
00:02:59.380 So that's a lot of trouble there.
00:03:02.420 I don't know what's involved
00:03:04.040 in unadopting somebody,
00:03:05.940 but I would be unadopting
00:03:07.800 as quickly as I could.
00:03:10.800 All right, I have an idea
00:03:12.020 for fixing the cities.
00:03:13.640 You ready?
00:03:15.120 Idea for fixing the cities.
00:03:18.200 The federal government
00:03:19.180 should make it illegal
00:03:20.260 for elected city officials
00:03:27.040 to spend money.
00:03:30.200 Just couldn't do it.
00:03:31.000 You have to take the money spending
00:03:33.780 out of the elected officials' hands
00:03:35.600 for the cities.
00:03:36.320 The reason is
00:03:37.600 that it's all corrupt.
00:03:40.600 You don't fix anything
00:03:42.260 unless you have control
00:03:43.520 over where you move your money.
00:03:45.820 And if it's just going to
00:03:46.940 corrupt family members
00:03:48.320 and hiring of cousins
00:03:51.260 and stuff like that.
00:03:52.300 So, I'm not positive,
00:03:55.940 but my brief experience
00:03:57.440 of trying to deal
00:03:58.220 with a Democrat inner city,
00:04:01.560 because I had some experience
00:04:02.680 trying to do that,
00:04:04.020 is you actually can't do anything
00:04:06.760 unless you bribe them.
00:04:08.980 Did you know that?
00:04:11.440 If you're trying to work with a city
00:04:13.180 and trying to get them
00:04:14.500 to do anything,
00:04:15.400 they will ask for a bribe.
00:04:17.240 They'll do it directly.
00:04:18.900 Now, it'll usually be,
00:04:19.860 you know what would be great
00:04:21.180 is I've got this project
00:04:22.440 to try to build a park.
00:04:24.620 You know,
00:04:25.080 if you could help fund that park,
00:04:26.980 probably those things 0.91
00:04:28.320 you're asking for,
00:04:29.300 they might happen as well.
00:04:31.120 If you could just fund that park.
00:04:33.520 So, I think you have to take funding,
00:04:36.680 all kinds of funding and spending,
00:04:38.960 away from the local officials,
00:04:40.320 because the odds of them being corrupt
00:04:42.740 are near 100%.
00:04:44.800 It's near 100%.
00:04:47.480 So, you just have to take that power
00:04:49.360 away from them somehow.
00:04:50.620 Or have some kind of an oversight thing
00:04:52.480 that you trust.
00:04:53.180 I don't know how you'd design that.
00:04:55.380 All right.
00:04:56.760 So, are you all surprised
00:04:58.620 that at the last minute
00:04:59.940 they came up with a debt ceiling
00:05:02.240 increase that saved the country?
00:05:04.540 Big surprise?
00:05:07.900 Everybody?
00:05:08.900 Totally surprised
00:05:09.860 because it's what I told you
00:05:11.000 the first minute the story happened
00:05:12.700 that they don't get serious
00:05:14.420 until the last minute
00:05:15.560 because they don't have to.
00:05:17.620 And then the last minute
00:05:18.500 they look at their poll numbers
00:05:19.680 and they decide how bad it would be.
00:05:22.680 And then they make a deal
00:05:23.680 because they have to.
00:05:25.820 That was never real.
00:05:28.040 Yeah, that whole story
00:05:28.900 was never real.
00:05:30.560 They were always going to do
00:05:31.720 exactly what they did.
00:05:32.660 And then we'll argue over
00:05:35.460 who made the worser deal.
00:05:38.380 But, of course,
00:05:39.100 that will be aided by the fact
00:05:40.320 that we will not be informed
00:05:41.660 what the deal is.
00:05:43.560 And then it will be put
00:05:44.680 into some form
00:05:45.560 that you can't discern it
00:05:46.800 because it'll be too long.
00:05:48.980 So, Thomas Massey
00:05:50.040 was talking about the,
00:05:51.400 I don't know,
00:05:52.160 5,000 pages
00:05:53.260 it might end up to be.
00:05:55.420 And he suspected
00:05:56.340 they would have 72 hours,
00:05:58.680 Congress,
00:05:59.660 to look over
00:06:00.600 the 5,000 pages
00:06:02.020 of detailed complexity
00:06:04.320 to decide
00:06:05.440 whether to vote for it.
00:06:07.860 We have come up
00:06:09.020 with a system
00:06:09.740 that's a confusopoly,
00:06:11.980 meaning that the only way
00:06:13.540 anything happens
00:06:14.440 is if people aren't sure
00:06:16.100 what it is they're doing.
00:06:18.040 Because if you were sure
00:06:19.120 you knew what you were doing,
00:06:20.180 you would object to it.
00:06:21.860 So you have to get,
00:06:23.060 reach a situation
00:06:24.440 with a system
00:06:25.400 where neither side
00:06:26.860 is quite sure
00:06:27.700 what happened.
00:06:28.260 I don't know,
00:06:29.620 I feel like we got
00:06:30.560 some stuff
00:06:31.180 and I feel like
00:06:32.500 the other side
00:06:33.160 got some stuff.
00:06:34.600 I have a vague understanding
00:06:36.100 of what our stuff was
00:06:37.300 and what their stuff is,
00:06:38.380 but I don't really know
00:06:39.580 how to compare them
00:06:40.540 because I only have
00:06:41.740 these two vague ideas
00:06:43.020 of who got what.
00:06:44.280 So I can't even argue
00:06:45.800 because I don't know
00:06:46.620 if the other side
00:06:47.360 did better than us.
00:06:48.600 It's confusing.
00:06:50.600 So we have a system
00:06:51.740 that requires
00:06:52.600 nobody to understand
00:06:53.600 what's happening
00:06:54.260 or it wouldn't happen.
00:06:55.940 Think about that.
00:06:58.720 The system requires
00:07:00.020 that not only the public
00:07:02.040 but the people
00:07:02.700 voting for the bills
00:07:03.640 not quite understand them.
00:07:05.940 Because if they did,
00:07:07.120 they would have
00:07:07.580 specific things
00:07:08.440 to complain about.
00:07:09.840 But if they don't
00:07:10.560 quite understand
00:07:11.500 the bigger picture,
00:07:13.360 they don't really,
00:07:14.600 they can't get any
00:07:15.280 traction to complain.
00:07:17.080 So the only way
00:07:17.820 you can get rid
00:07:18.340 of the complaints
00:07:18.860 is to make it
00:07:19.540 too confusing
00:07:20.160 for anybody
00:07:20.720 to participate
00:07:21.600 in a meaningful way.
00:07:24.040 That's our system.
00:07:25.940 Our system
00:07:27.220 is to remove
00:07:28.700 humans from the process
00:07:30.380 by making it
00:07:31.640 too complicated
00:07:32.280 for them to participate.
00:07:36.300 Is that correct
00:07:37.620 or no?
00:07:38.500 Does that characterization
00:07:40.020 capture what we're watching
00:07:42.440 every time they go
00:07:43.280 through this process?
00:07:44.860 It's exactly that.
00:07:46.880 They make it
00:07:47.680 too complicated
00:07:48.440 so humans
00:07:49.300 can't productively
00:07:50.380 get involved.
00:07:52.120 Because you'd never
00:07:53.160 get anything done
00:07:53.800 if humans
00:07:54.280 were productively involved.
00:07:55.940 They have to
00:07:57.840 create a system
00:07:59.200 which is absurd
00:08:00.240 by its design.
00:08:02.360 It's intentionally
00:08:03.200 absurd.
00:08:04.280 Because that's actually
00:08:05.060 the only way
00:08:05.560 anything gets done.
00:08:08.220 So Thomas Massey
00:08:09.580 on his tweet
00:08:10.460 about, you know,
00:08:11.620 they'd have 72 hours
00:08:12.800 to look at 5,000 pages
00:08:14.120 of complexity.
00:08:15.780 And so I suggested
00:08:17.040 they ask AI
00:08:19.340 to summarize it for them.
00:08:22.500 Let that sink in.
00:08:23.620 What if it could?
00:08:26.520 What if you could
00:08:27.300 just turn AI loose
00:08:28.300 on it and say,
00:08:28.880 all right,
00:08:29.040 here's the summary.
00:08:30.400 I'm going to summarize
00:08:31.080 this in plain English
00:08:32.320 so you can see
00:08:33.380 what's happening.
00:08:35.180 Well, the first problem
00:08:36.240 is AI might not
00:08:37.220 do it right.
00:08:38.520 Right?
00:08:38.820 Because AI
00:08:39.440 is a little biased
00:08:41.020 and sometimes
00:08:41.660 it makes up stuff.
00:08:44.040 So it could actually 0.99
00:08:44.780 just make up some shit 1.00
00:08:45.860 and say, 1.00
00:08:46.660 oh, this isn't the bill.
00:08:48.140 It's a save the
00:08:48.960 quality of the bill.
00:08:49.520 Another part of the bill.
00:08:51.440 At which point
00:08:52.120 you'd say,
00:08:52.800 oh, that's not even
00:08:54.140 in that bill.
00:08:55.480 So that's a risk.
00:08:56.740 But I suppose
00:08:57.160 we could probably
00:08:57.780 fact check that
00:08:58.540 pretty quickly
00:08:59.100 and know what's in it now.
00:09:01.340 But what if it worked?
00:09:04.820 Well, what if AI
00:09:06.040 could actually tell you
00:09:07.380 in a real summary way
00:09:08.880 even who did a better job
00:09:11.760 of negotiating?
00:09:12.740 That'd be really dangerous.
00:09:14.300 But suppose it could
00:09:15.020 just tell you
00:09:15.540 what the bill is
00:09:16.280 so you wouldn't
00:09:17.440 have to read it.
00:09:20.380 They would have to ban it.
00:09:22.840 AI would be banned
00:09:24.000 from that use
00:09:25.040 because it would
00:09:26.460 allow you to understand
00:09:27.460 what's in the bill
00:09:28.220 and that would break
00:09:29.060 the whole system.
00:09:30.160 That's not a joke.
00:09:31.560 If you understood
00:09:32.560 what was in it,
00:09:33.960 it couldn't get passed.
00:09:36.000 That's just true.
00:09:39.340 So we keep finding
00:09:42.280 these examples
00:09:43.180 where even if AI
00:09:45.120 could solve
00:09:45.860 what you think
00:09:46.480 is the problem,
00:09:47.440 it's not the real problem.
00:09:49.720 The real problem
00:09:50.720 is that we can't
00:09:51.760 deal with decision making.
00:09:53.240 We don't have
00:09:54.020 any capacity
00:09:54.680 to do that.
00:09:55.920 You know,
00:09:56.360 beyond a certain level
00:09:57.180 of complexity
00:09:57.760 and self-interest,
00:09:59.320 we don't have
00:09:59.740 any capacity.
00:10:01.220 So we would have
00:10:03.340 to ban AI
00:10:04.260 from summarizing
00:10:05.340 legislation
00:10:06.060 because the net effect
00:10:07.820 is we would
00:10:08.380 understand it.
00:10:10.800 Just think about that.
00:10:12.300 That's a real thing.
00:10:13.640 I mean that
00:10:14.340 entirely seriously.
00:10:15.560 You could not
00:10:16.740 have a good
00:10:17.240 understanding
00:10:17.780 by the public
00:10:18.540 of the government's
00:10:20.020 operation
00:10:20.480 without breaking it.
00:10:22.600 And then what do you do?
00:10:25.220 All right.
00:10:26.620 Jane Fonda
00:10:27.740 has helpfully
00:10:30.940 suggested
00:10:31.520 that the real problem
00:10:34.760 of the world 0.99
00:10:35.460 is white men
00:10:37.700 and that the white
00:10:39.560 men, 0.91
00:10:39.960 the patriarchy,
00:10:41.340 they're responsible
00:10:42.160 for racism
00:10:42.900 and, of course,
00:10:44.060 climate change
00:10:44.840 indirectly.
00:10:46.160 Well,
00:10:46.440 directly,
00:10:46.940 I guess.
00:10:47.860 And her suggestion
00:10:49.040 is that maybe
00:10:49.520 all the white men 1.00
00:10:50.440 should be rounded up 1.00
00:10:51.460 and put in jail,
00:10:52.600 arrested and jailed.
00:10:53.600 So,
00:10:56.620 got that going on.
00:10:58.860 You know,
00:10:59.420 I thought about,
00:11:00.360 oh,
00:11:00.680 I'm going to add
00:11:01.480 my layers
00:11:02.340 of interesting
00:11:02.980 commentary
00:11:03.580 on top of that. 0.93
00:11:05.460 What the hell
00:11:06.200 can I layer
00:11:06.780 on top of that?
00:11:08.640 Is there anything
00:11:09.460 that can be funnier 0.99
00:11:10.400 or more ridiculous 0.98
00:11:11.280 or more absurd 0.99
00:11:12.160 or more of a
00:11:13.620 sign of the times?
00:11:15.920 Oh,
00:11:16.220 let's do our
00:11:16.720 little thing
00:11:17.260 where we reverse
00:11:18.280 the ethnicities
00:11:21.400 of the people
00:11:21.900 involved.
00:11:22.460 So,
00:11:23.600 let's see.
00:11:24.020 Jane Fonda
00:11:24.520 said that
00:11:25.160 all the problems 1.00
00:11:26.300 are black men 1.00
00:11:28.120 and they should 1.00
00:11:28.600 all be arrested
00:11:29.120 and jailed.
00:11:31.220 Now,
00:11:31.480 she didn't say that,
00:11:33.080 but I wonder
00:11:34.180 if she could have.
00:11:37.000 No,
00:11:37.540 of course she could.
00:11:38.660 Of course she could.
00:11:40.700 All right.
00:11:41.540 I saw the
00:11:42.440 Khan Academy
00:11:44.680 founder.
00:11:46.140 I guess his name
00:11:47.200 is Khan.
00:11:48.380 And he was talking
00:11:49.320 about how AI
00:11:50.120 is going to change.
00:11:51.280 it's going to be
00:11:52.500 such a radical
00:11:53.600 change for education
00:11:54.800 that it's basically
00:11:56.820 just everything
00:11:57.680 will be different
00:11:58.420 in about a year
00:11:59.440 probably.
00:12:00.600 This is probably
00:12:01.320 the best thing
00:12:01.880 that AI will do
00:12:02.820 unless it gets
00:12:03.760 outlawed,
00:12:04.300 which is possible.
00:12:07.160 Because there's
00:12:08.140 no possibility
00:12:10.060 that AI won't do
00:12:12.340 a better job
00:12:12.960 than real teachers.
00:12:15.500 Am I right?
00:12:16.900 Now,
00:12:17.120 maybe not on
00:12:17.700 day one.
00:12:18.720 On day one,
00:12:19.320 maybe the best
00:12:19.960 human teacher
00:12:20.560 is still better
00:12:21.200 than the best
00:12:21.900 AI.
00:12:22.840 But there aren't
00:12:23.600 that many of those.
00:12:25.100 Whoever is the
00:12:25.940 best human teacher
00:12:27.100 is top 5%.
00:12:28.280 Not many people.
00:12:30.840 So,
00:12:31.240 for most people,
00:12:33.540 the AI
00:12:34.660 would be much better.
00:12:36.260 Now,
00:12:36.540 I saw some pushback
00:12:37.560 and people said,
00:12:38.980 Scott,
00:12:39.540 you saw what
00:12:40.340 remote learning
00:12:41.180 did during the
00:12:42.240 pandemic.
00:12:43.460 Obviously,
00:12:44.300 remote learning
00:12:45.100 doesn't work.
00:12:47.040 We never tested
00:12:48.000 AI remote learning.
00:12:49.820 We tested humans.
00:12:51.800 And the human
00:12:52.900 was one person
00:12:53.880 with a crowd
00:12:54.560 of a bunch
00:12:55.800 of people
00:12:56.260 who weren't
00:12:57.360 being supervised
00:12:58.040 watching.
00:12:59.360 If you had a
00:13:00.120 one-on-one class
00:13:01.160 where your AI
00:13:01.920 is designed
00:13:02.820 to be exactly
00:13:04.120 the character
00:13:04.840 that your child
00:13:05.660 wants to listen to,
00:13:07.460 you know,
00:13:07.700 if the kid
00:13:08.460 is 5 years old,
00:13:10.300 they give it,
00:13:11.380 you know,
00:13:11.720 Barney or Pikachu
00:13:13.160 or some character
00:13:14.340 to teach them
00:13:15.380 English,
00:13:17.060 teach them,
00:13:17.860 you know,
00:13:18.900 ABCs.
00:13:20.080 But if they're
00:13:20.860 a little older,
00:13:21.780 they're teenagers,
00:13:22.960 maybe the boys
00:13:23.660 want a female 0.98
00:13:24.920 in some cases.
00:13:26.560 Maybe the women 1.00
00:13:27.600 want a female too. 0.98
00:13:29.020 There might be
00:13:29.640 some types of teachers
00:13:30.640 that just work better
00:13:32.200 for some personality
00:13:33.140 types at certain ages.
00:13:35.160 So,
00:13:35.800 if you had
00:13:36.240 exactly the right AI
00:13:38.120 that looked
00:13:39.460 and acted human,
00:13:40.380 but it was exactly
00:13:41.560 the one you were
00:13:42.300 willing to listen to,
00:13:44.780 do you think
00:13:45.240 you'd learn more?
00:13:46.420 If you could
00:13:46.760 actually interact
00:13:47.660 and they could
00:13:48.580 learn about you
00:13:49.460 and they could
00:13:49.980 ask how your day went
00:13:51.420 and they would
00:13:52.380 know what you did
00:13:53.080 when you weren't
00:13:53.560 with them
00:13:53.920 and they could
00:13:55.000 follow up on it
00:13:55.980 and all that stuff?
00:13:57.900 I don't know.
00:13:59.440 So,
00:13:59.860 but there is
00:14:00.600 one wild card
00:14:01.560 here that
00:14:02.960 I don't know
00:14:04.420 how to value
00:14:05.000 and it goes
00:14:06.760 like this.
00:14:08.140 If you
00:14:08.740 tell me,
00:14:10.420 Scott,
00:14:10.780 you have to go
00:14:11.360 exercise
00:14:11.880 and you say
00:14:13.780 you have two choices.
00:14:14.840 You can do it
00:14:15.320 in your home gym
00:14:16.660 all by yourself
00:14:17.440 or you could
00:14:18.880 do it at a gym
00:14:19.600 where everybody
00:14:20.420 is exercising
00:14:21.180 at the same time.
00:14:23.220 Only one of those
00:14:24.240 is going to get me
00:14:24.980 to exercise enough
00:14:26.180 and believe me,
00:14:27.200 I'm struggling
00:14:27.940 with this
00:14:28.380 because I quit
00:14:28.900 my gym.
00:14:29.800 I absolutely
00:14:30.680 can't work out
00:14:31.520 at home as much.
00:14:32.900 I just cannot
00:14:33.780 put in the time
00:14:34.760 because I'm bored.
00:14:37.580 I'm bored.
00:14:38.080 And I need
00:14:39.040 the energy
00:14:39.560 of the other
00:14:40.100 people.
00:14:40.960 I need
00:14:41.280 the peer
00:14:41.980 pressure
00:14:42.360 of the other
00:14:42.860 people to lift
00:14:43.940 me up.
00:14:44.460 That's why
00:14:44.820 I belong to
00:14:45.580 a gym.
00:14:46.260 That was the
00:14:46.760 main reason
00:14:47.160 I belonged.
00:14:48.460 And it's
00:14:49.700 the same
00:14:50.020 with school.
00:14:51.440 You put me
00:14:52.300 in a human
00:14:53.240 school situation
00:14:54.400 where I'm
00:14:55.280 looking around
00:14:55.840 at my competitors
00:14:56.720 and I saw
00:14:57.740 them that way
00:14:58.240 by the way.
00:14:58.980 I saw the
00:14:59.560 other students
00:15:00.080 as my
00:15:00.480 competitors
00:15:00.940 and I would
00:15:01.980 be like,
00:15:02.840 game on.
00:15:04.120 Give me that
00:15:04.580 test.
00:15:05.300 I'm going to
00:15:05.580 see if I can
00:15:06.020 beat all these 0.86
00:15:06.640 people.
00:15:08.240 And so the
00:15:09.300 peer pressure,
00:15:10.500 the feeling of
00:15:11.100 other people
00:15:11.520 doing it at
00:15:12.020 the same time,
00:15:13.420 it would put
00:15:14.160 me in the
00:15:14.580 right energy
00:15:15.220 for doing the
00:15:16.560 things the
00:15:16.960 school wanted
00:15:17.460 me to do.
00:15:18.500 Now you put
00:15:19.100 me at home
00:15:19.700 on my own
00:15:20.440 schedule and
00:15:21.800 I turn on
00:15:22.340 this thing and
00:15:22.900 the AI is
00:15:23.440 perfect.
00:15:24.440 It knows
00:15:24.720 everything.
00:15:25.220 It's a great
00:15:25.660 teacher.
00:15:26.760 But do I
00:15:27.380 have the right
00:15:27.840 energy?
00:15:29.280 Do I have
00:15:29.920 the right
00:15:30.260 energy to
00:15:30.840 want to sit
00:15:31.260 there and
00:15:31.680 listen to a
00:15:32.180 machine for
00:15:32.860 six hours
00:15:34.280 per day?
00:15:35.440 I feel
00:15:36.800 like the
00:15:37.280 human part
00:15:38.200 can't be
00:15:39.700 removed without
00:15:40.440 removing the
00:15:41.580 incentive, the
00:15:43.260 shared incentive,
00:15:45.280 the slop over
00:15:46.440 feeling from
00:15:47.140 your fellow
00:15:47.620 human beings.
00:15:49.020 I think you
00:15:49.500 need the slop
00:15:51.380 over feeling
00:15:52.060 from other
00:15:52.540 people to get
00:15:53.140 some stuff
00:15:53.640 done.
00:15:54.460 So that's
00:15:54.820 what I worry
00:15:55.240 about.
00:15:56.220 Now there
00:15:56.560 might be a
00:15:57.500 way to fix
00:15:57.940 that by
00:15:59.100 making sure
00:15:59.680 that when
00:16:00.040 you use your
00:16:00.620 AI there
00:16:01.440 were other
00:16:01.740 people in
00:16:02.120 the room
00:16:02.540 and other
00:16:03.220 students and
00:16:04.180 you met
00:16:06.040 with your
00:16:06.320 other students
00:16:06.900 every half
00:16:07.960 hour to
00:16:09.320 do a
00:16:09.580 project or
00:16:10.240 something.
00:16:10.700 I don't
00:16:10.900 know.
00:16:11.320 There's
00:16:11.500 probably some
00:16:12.160 way to get
00:16:12.500 the humans
00:16:13.000 back in
00:16:13.500 there.
00:16:14.280 But if
00:16:14.740 you take
00:16:15.040 the humans
00:16:15.580 out, I
00:16:18.380 just worry
00:16:18.860 that your
00:16:19.180 normal
00:16:19.640 biology won't
00:16:21.840 rise to
00:16:22.420 the challenge.
00:16:25.920 All right.
00:16:27.520 I can tell
00:16:28.360 you that I
00:16:28.800 had the
00:16:29.220 hottest French
00:16:30.100 teacher in
00:16:30.600 the history
00:16:31.040 of French
00:16:31.840 teachers.
00:16:32.240 And if
00:16:33.360 you don't
00:16:33.660 think I
00:16:34.060 enjoyed going
00:16:34.620 to that
00:16:34.980 class every
00:16:35.540 day, and
00:16:36.680 did it make
00:16:37.160 me study
00:16:37.860 harder because
00:16:39.200 the French
00:16:40.740 teacher, Ms.
00:16:42.480 Rawson, I
00:16:43.160 remember her
00:16:43.680 quite clearly,
00:16:45.880 was so
00:16:47.400 insanely
00:16:47.860 attractive that
00:16:48.960 you basically
00:16:50.580 could barely
00:16:51.280 concentrate.
00:16:54.420 I got an
00:16:55.080 A in
00:16:55.360 French.
00:16:56.740 I got an
00:16:57.240 A in
00:16:57.540 French.
00:16:57.980 And when
00:16:58.700 my sister
00:16:59.260 took the
00:16:59.720 same course
00:17:00.340 a few years
00:17:00.860 later, I
00:17:02.540 was used
00:17:03.020 as an
00:17:03.380 example of
00:17:03.960 somebody who
00:17:04.420 could get
00:17:04.820 an A in 0.90
00:17:05.640 a language
00:17:06.140 course without
00:17:07.240 being able to
00:17:07.980 speak any
00:17:08.440 of it.
00:17:11.220 I'm the 0.88
00:17:11.820 worst French 0.98
00:17:12.680 speaker, but
00:17:14.120 if you give
00:17:14.500 me a test
00:17:15.820 with multiple
00:17:16.380 choice or
00:17:16.920 something, I
00:17:17.520 can pretty
00:17:17.860 much ace
00:17:18.320 it.
00:17:19.300 So I had
00:17:20.560 an A in 0.90
00:17:21.040 French and
00:17:21.540 couldn't speak
00:17:21.940 a sentence,
00:17:24.180 except, you
00:17:24.640 know,
00:17:25.260 ou a la
00:17:25.900 bibliothèque.
00:17:26.740 That was
00:17:26.960 about it.
00:17:27.380 All right,
00:17:29.780 but I
00:17:29.960 liked the
00:17:30.260 class.
00:17:33.520 So here's
00:17:34.360 the good
00:17:34.600 news.
00:17:35.060 If AI
00:17:35.680 replaces human
00:17:36.780 teachers, we
00:17:37.520 will have a
00:17:38.360 way to get
00:17:38.780 rid of the
00:17:39.200 biggest source
00:17:41.280 of systemic
00:17:42.640 racism in
00:17:43.420 the country.
00:17:45.440 Imagine, if
00:17:46.140 you will,
00:17:47.640 that a 0.99
00:17:48.460 poor black 1.00
00:17:49.580 kid in an 0.99
00:17:50.340 urban area
00:17:51.060 could get an
00:17:52.220 A in
00:17:52.480 A teacher
00:17:52.960 that's as
00:17:53.440 good as
00:17:53.760 everybody
00:17:54.080 else's A
00:17:54.780 in
00:17:54.940 A teacher.
00:17:55.640 No
00:17:55.860 difference.
00:17:56.260 is just
00:17:57.040 as good
00:17:57.480 for the
00:17:58.860 first time
00:17:59.320 ever.
00:18:02.040 In a
00:18:02.720 related
00:18:03.140 point, can
00:18:04.660 you think
00:18:05.060 of any
00:18:05.520 profession in
00:18:07.220 which the
00:18:09.880 profession as
00:18:10.700 a whole has
00:18:11.780 failed so
00:18:12.700 spectacularly over
00:18:13.880 the last, let's
00:18:14.720 say, 10
00:18:15.120 years?
00:18:16.620 I keep
00:18:17.440 reading about
00:18:18.160 the number
00:18:18.780 of specifically
00:18:20.600 black students
00:18:21.780 who can read 0.74
00:18:22.760 at class
00:18:23.500 level.
00:18:24.100 It's something
00:18:24.780 like 12%.
00:18:25.940 Or in
00:18:26.900 some
00:18:27.120 teachers,
00:18:27.720 zero.
00:18:28.480 Or in
00:18:28.660 some places,
00:18:29.240 zero.
00:18:29.940 Zero.
00:18:31.720 Zero?
00:18:32.820 There's not a
00:18:33.620 single person
00:18:34.260 who could read
00:18:34.800 at grade
00:18:35.180 level?
00:18:36.880 Can you
00:18:37.540 think of
00:18:37.880 any situation
00:18:38.660 where you
00:18:39.020 could keep
00:18:39.480 your job
00:18:40.100 with those
00:18:40.660 statistics?
00:18:44.160 The future
00:18:45.020 AI teachers
00:18:45.840 unions?
00:18:46.500 Yeah, that
00:18:46.780 could happen.
00:18:47.240 Well, so
00:18:54.240 maybe if we
00:18:54.920 get rid of
00:18:55.400 teachers, we
00:18:56.300 could get
00:18:56.580 rid of
00:18:56.820 teachers' 0.80
00:18:57.260 unions, and
00:18:57.900 then maybe
00:18:58.460 black Americans
00:18:59.620 have a chance
00:19:00.280 in the United
00:19:00.960 States.
00:19:01.780 Because otherwise
00:19:02.380 you're just
00:19:02.800 going to get
00:19:03.140 teachers that
00:19:03.780 either won't
00:19:05.020 or can't
00:19:05.640 control the
00:19:06.600 class and
00:19:07.120 can't teach.
00:19:07.860 For whatever
00:19:08.340 reason, they
00:19:08.820 can't teach.
00:19:09.740 It might not
00:19:10.280 be the
00:19:10.580 teacher's fault,
00:19:11.800 but I've
00:19:12.320 never seen a
00:19:12.820 profession that
00:19:13.460 failed thoroughly,
00:19:15.000 like just
00:19:16.120 completely, and
00:19:17.920 they still have
00:19:18.440 their jobs.
00:19:20.280 What's up with
00:19:20.900 that?
00:19:22.540 Yeah, I think
00:19:23.400 that the
00:19:23.840 wokeness problem,
00:19:25.040 the falling
00:19:26.240 behind other
00:19:26.820 countries problem,
00:19:28.380 pretty much all
00:19:29.360 of it is related
00:19:30.320 to our bad
00:19:31.520 teachers, which
00:19:33.340 is related to
00:19:34.000 the bad
00:19:34.400 teachers' 0.80
00:19:35.040 unions.
00:19:36.980 All right.
00:19:39.180 There's a
00:19:39.980 study using
00:19:41.020 magnetism to
00:19:42.940 try to cure
00:19:43.580 depression in
00:19:44.520 some types
00:19:44.940 of people.
00:19:45.560 So they
00:19:45.960 say it
00:19:46.240 won't work
00:19:46.660 for all
00:19:47.000 types of
00:19:47.400 depression,
00:19:48.460 but it's
00:19:49.080 so weird
00:19:49.520 what they
00:19:49.940 did.
00:19:50.340 They used
00:19:50.760 magnetic
00:19:51.620 technology to
00:19:54.720 quote,
00:19:55.440 reverse the
00:19:56.280 flow of
00:19:56.880 the neural
00:19:57.420 stream from
00:19:58.920 one part of
00:19:59.680 the brain to
00:20:00.220 the other
00:20:00.540 part of the
00:20:00.940 brain.
00:20:02.420 How wild
00:20:02.940 is that?
00:20:04.380 So they
00:20:04.760 know that the
00:20:06.400 normal brain of
00:20:07.900 a depressed
00:20:08.380 person, again,
00:20:09.440 not every
00:20:10.020 depressed person,
00:20:11.140 they're different,
00:20:12.180 but some
00:20:12.720 category of
00:20:13.360 depressed
00:20:13.660 people,
00:20:14.520 they can
00:20:14.900 identify with
00:20:15.720 imaging that
00:20:16.860 there's too
00:20:17.320 much neural
00:20:18.760 activity going
00:20:19.580 from one part
00:20:20.240 of the brain
00:20:20.600 to the other.
00:20:21.860 So they can
00:20:22.420 actually hook
00:20:23.000 a magnetic
00:20:24.060 device to you
00:20:25.040 and reverse the
00:20:26.600 flow of the
00:20:27.400 neural traffic.
00:20:29.320 And it makes
00:20:30.100 you feel good
00:20:30.780 because it makes
00:20:31.920 you feel the way
00:20:32.500 regular people do
00:20:33.360 because that's the
00:20:34.300 direction their
00:20:34.880 neural pathways go.
00:20:36.260 And I guess you
00:20:36.960 can train it
00:20:37.680 after a while to
00:20:38.880 not need the
00:20:39.460 magnets, so you
00:20:40.820 can actually just
00:20:41.420 reverse it and
00:20:42.640 cure people in
00:20:43.840 a fairly short
00:20:44.520 amount of
00:20:44.900 time.
00:20:45.800 Now here's
00:20:46.300 what I love
00:20:48.060 about that.
00:20:49.460 Suppose it's
00:20:50.400 true that we
00:20:52.260 can identify the
00:20:53.340 flow of
00:20:54.200 neural,
00:20:56.300 whatever it is,
00:20:58.640 neural streams,
00:21:00.580 I don't know,
00:21:01.320 neurons.
00:21:02.180 I don't know
00:21:02.780 exactly what's
00:21:03.400 flowing.
00:21:03.900 I guess just the
00:21:04.500 electrical signal
00:21:05.380 is the thing
00:21:06.440 that's flowing.
00:21:07.680 But just a
00:21:08.820 signal is flowing,
00:21:09.580 right?
00:21:09.720 It's not
00:21:10.060 physically anything,
00:21:11.120 it's a signal
00:21:11.820 that's flowing.
00:21:13.140 So what if we
00:21:14.620 can identify all
00:21:15.920 of the major
00:21:16.880 neural pathways
00:21:17.840 that are normal
00:21:19.020 and we can watch
00:21:20.700 them flow?
00:21:21.840 And what if this
00:21:22.740 technology improves
00:21:24.460 so that we can
00:21:25.640 target any one of
00:21:26.600 those neural
00:21:27.140 pathways and
00:21:28.480 reverse or slow
00:21:29.700 down its flow?
00:21:31.420 You could actually
00:21:32.760 physically reprogram
00:21:35.060 a brain, and they
00:21:36.420 already are.
00:21:37.360 You can physically
00:21:38.360 reprogram a brain.
00:21:39.980 Physically.
00:21:42.580 And do you know
00:21:44.140 how you reprogram
00:21:45.440 a computer?
00:21:48.120 Same way.
00:21:49.840 That's how you
00:21:50.460 reprogram a
00:21:51.500 computer.
00:21:53.060 With magnetic
00:21:54.220 technology.
00:21:55.700 If you want to
00:21:56.460 put something on
00:21:57.220 a hard disk, you
00:21:59.180 change it
00:21:59.660 magnetically.
00:22:01.120 It's the same 0.99
00:22:01.700 damn technology 0.99
00:22:02.480 we're using for 0.99
00:22:03.140 computers, just
00:22:04.420 optimized for a
00:22:05.280 brain that's moist
00:22:06.120 instead of silicon
00:22:07.100 that's dry.
00:22:08.400 And that's the
00:22:08.920 main difference.
00:22:09.980 But the future
00:22:13.040 that you can
00:22:13.540 imagine where
00:22:14.620 they can change
00:22:15.460 the direction of
00:22:16.600 your neural
00:22:17.220 signals, that's
00:22:20.160 like insanely
00:22:21.120 exciting if we
00:22:22.980 do it right.
00:22:24.840 Yes, I am
00:22:25.600 reprogramming your 0.68
00:22:26.600 brain right now,
00:22:27.280 Ian.
00:22:27.860 Can you feel it
00:22:28.780 in real time?
00:22:31.140 So that's kind
00:22:31.900 of exciting.
00:22:33.000 I'm giving you
00:22:33.680 all the good news
00:22:34.580 ahead kind of
00:22:35.320 stories.
00:22:35.640 question, what
00:22:39.880 would happen if
00:22:40.580 AI learned how
00:22:43.020 to identify fake
00:22:44.220 news?
00:22:46.860 What would
00:22:47.620 happen?
00:22:48.700 Because again, we
00:22:50.040 are a nation that's
00:22:51.220 held together by
00:22:52.160 fake news.
00:22:53.700 Everything that we
00:22:54.720 do is pretty much
00:22:55.920 based on something
00:22:56.680 that wasn't true.
00:22:58.780 Now, sometimes it's
00:22:59.800 good for us, and
00:23:01.160 sometimes it's not,
00:23:02.140 but it's all
00:23:03.080 based on lies.
00:23:04.980 What if AI told
00:23:06.240 you what the lies
00:23:07.100 were as they were
00:23:07.680 happening, and you
00:23:09.200 came to trust its
00:23:10.980 judgment?
00:23:12.240 Well, the first
00:23:13.160 question is, how
00:23:13.960 well can it do?
00:23:15.600 And I would argue
00:23:16.420 that I could already
00:23:17.500 train it with a
00:23:18.380 super prompt.
00:23:19.100 Now, a super prompt
00:23:21.640 is basically asking
00:23:24.160 it a question, but
00:23:25.740 adding a lot of
00:23:26.820 caveats to the
00:23:28.000 question, so you
00:23:29.440 prevent the AI from
00:23:30.900 going into the
00:23:32.060 wrong direction.
00:23:33.440 It's a way to
00:23:34.080 constrain the AI's
00:23:35.440 answer to the most
00:23:36.460 useful answer.
00:23:37.800 So a super prompt
00:23:38.820 could be, for
00:23:39.960 example, hey, AI,
00:23:43.060 the following rules
00:23:44.560 have been known to
00:23:45.600 identify fake news.
00:23:47.500 Not with 100%
00:23:49.260 accuracy.
00:23:50.440 Now, everything I'm
00:23:51.320 saying right now,
00:23:53.000 this entire long
00:23:54.200 form of everything I'm
00:23:55.280 about to say, would
00:23:56.740 be part of the
00:23:57.340 prompt.
00:23:58.560 Because AI doesn't
00:23:59.680 care if the prompt is
00:24:00.740 a page long, because
00:24:02.680 it can handle the
00:24:03.640 complexity.
00:24:04.880 So you can put stuff
00:24:05.920 in there.
00:24:06.280 Hey, AI, I want you
00:24:08.140 to see if you can
00:24:08.720 identify some fake
00:24:09.780 news.
00:24:10.760 And here are the
00:24:11.580 tips for how to do
00:24:13.160 it.
00:24:13.340 Number one, if both
00:24:17.040 sides of the political
00:24:18.360 spectrum report it the
00:24:19.880 same, it's probably
00:24:21.400 true.
00:24:22.460 If one side reports
00:24:23.660 it, but the other
00:24:24.340 side says it's not
00:24:25.320 true, its credibility
00:24:27.160 goes down 75%.
00:24:29.340 So that's just a rule.
00:24:32.000 Now, everything would
00:24:32.740 be based on the odds,
00:24:35.120 not yes, no.
00:24:36.600 So if you see the
00:24:37.660 situation where one
00:24:38.680 side says it's true,
00:24:39.760 the other side says
00:24:40.480 it's not, reduce the
00:24:42.700 credibility by 75%.
00:24:44.480 Okay?
00:24:46.900 Or whatever.
00:24:47.900 Right?
00:24:48.120 I'm making up the
00:24:48.680 75%.
00:24:49.460 Next rule would be if
00:24:52.920 it's too on the nose.
00:24:54.920 In other words, if it's
00:24:56.140 a, if it fits too
00:24:57.460 cleanly, an existing
00:24:59.260 narrative, assume that
00:25:01.400 it's probably artificial.
00:25:03.860 Now, I don't know how
00:25:04.600 you'd get it to
00:25:05.720 understand what a
00:25:06.480 narrative is or whether
00:25:07.780 something fit it.
00:25:09.280 But that's what the AI
00:25:10.300 is supposed to do, I
00:25:11.060 guess.
00:25:11.320 How about this?
00:25:13.660 As part of your
00:25:14.220 question, if you see
00:25:16.260 that they're trying to
00:25:17.040 prove a negative, that's
00:25:19.660 a sign.
00:25:20.960 There was no, there was
00:25:23.120 no election irregularities
00:25:25.180 because we didn't find
00:25:26.380 any.
00:25:28.100 If they, if the story is
00:25:29.740 presented to you as
00:25:30.980 proving a negative, we
00:25:32.660 proved it doesn't exist by
00:25:34.260 not looking in the right
00:25:35.380 places, then your
00:25:37.020 credibility should be
00:25:38.020 lowered.
00:25:38.240 How about if you
00:25:41.700 recognize the players
00:25:43.000 from past lies?
00:25:45.700 For example, if
00:25:47.140 there's a new topic
00:25:48.080 tomorrow and the name
00:25:49.820 that you see the most is
00:25:50.920 Adam Schiff, John
00:25:52.940 Brennan, and Clapper,
00:25:56.180 James Clapper, if you
00:25:58.120 saw those three people on
00:25:59.540 the same side of a story,
00:26:01.740 you should discount his
00:26:03.740 credibility based on
00:26:05.160 experience.
00:26:05.620 If the story comes from
00:26:08.420 Maggie Haberman, you
00:26:11.120 should put a different
00:26:12.100 odds on the credibility
00:26:13.200 of that story than maybe
00:26:15.320 a story that comes from
00:26:16.360 Glenn Greenwald, if you
00:26:18.120 know what I mean.
00:26:19.520 If you catch my drift,
00:26:22.560 you know, you're going to
00:26:23.060 give the Matt Taibbi a
00:26:25.020 little bit of higher
00:26:25.880 credibility than, you
00:26:28.040 know, Stephen
00:26:29.960 Collinson and CNN.
00:26:31.200 They're not equals.
00:26:33.560 Some are known
00:26:34.360 propagandists, and some
00:26:36.080 are known independent
00:26:37.120 journalists who are
00:26:37.800 actually just trying to
00:26:38.540 get the story.
00:26:39.960 So you could tell AI
00:26:41.240 which people to trust
00:26:42.380 based on experience.
00:26:44.700 You could say if
00:26:45.800 there are politicians,
00:26:47.840 don't believe anything.
00:26:52.240 So he says I'm being
00:26:53.440 anti-Semitic.
00:26:54.280 Okay.
00:26:58.040 Here's another one.
00:26:59.500 If the claim is
00:27:01.160 outrageous to the
00:27:02.220 point of absurdity,
00:27:03.660 it's probably not
00:27:04.820 true.
00:27:06.040 Because in the real
00:27:06.720 world, that's always
00:27:07.520 the case.
00:27:10.460 Now, sometimes things
00:27:11.880 are absurd, but it's
00:27:13.880 so rare that the
00:27:15.220 credibility of a story
00:27:16.360 should be lowered if
00:27:17.920 the claim is
00:27:19.020 amazingly absurd.
00:27:21.160 Oh, I think an alien
00:27:23.340 came and ate
00:27:25.720 Russia.
00:27:26.920 Right?
00:27:27.120 If you heard that,
00:27:28.960 and you'd say, I
00:27:29.880 feel like I would have
00:27:30.740 heard if Russia
00:27:31.820 disappeared.
00:27:33.800 So that's like a
00:27:34.600 kind of a crazy
00:27:35.580 claim.
00:27:36.640 So could AI
00:27:37.840 understand what is
00:27:38.780 absurd?
00:27:39.880 Do you think AI
00:27:40.680 could understand an
00:27:42.020 unlikely story from a
00:27:43.580 likely story based on
00:27:45.500 just knowing what is
00:27:46.320 average and normal?
00:27:47.860 Maybe.
00:27:49.140 I think it could.
00:27:49.800 How about if it's
00:27:53.720 still the fog of war?
00:27:56.720 Suppose it's early in
00:27:58.140 a complicated story.
00:28:00.200 Should the AI then
00:28:01.600 discount the story as
00:28:03.180 too early to know?
00:28:04.500 Of course it should.
00:28:05.840 I do.
00:28:06.660 That's what I tell you
00:28:07.900 every time we have a
00:28:08.600 new complicated story.
00:28:10.060 I always say the same
00:28:10.960 thing.
00:28:11.980 Everything that's being
00:28:12.880 reported is in doubt.
00:28:16.480 Just wait for it to
00:28:17.320 settle.
00:28:18.260 So AI could learn that.
00:28:19.800 Do you think that the
00:28:22.900 AI could identify
00:28:24.040 something that fits a
00:28:26.060 narrative?
00:28:27.720 Could it identify a
00:28:29.020 narrative and then
00:28:29.780 get a fact that fits it
00:28:32.120 too closely?
00:28:33.180 Do you think it would
00:28:34.000 be able to do that?
00:28:35.700 I think it could.
00:28:37.500 Maybe.
00:28:38.620 All right.
00:28:39.040 So what would happen
00:28:40.160 if you got to the
00:28:40.880 point where somebody
00:28:42.540 built an AI fact
00:28:43.920 checker or they built a
00:28:46.060 super prompt that's
00:28:47.380 basically embedded with
00:28:49.240 all the little tips I
00:28:50.200 just gave you and
00:28:51.240 more?
00:28:51.500 So you'd add some more
00:28:52.940 tips for spotting fake
00:28:54.160 news.
00:28:55.500 So and then the AI
00:28:57.340 says I will rate this
00:28:59.120 news story as 30%
00:29:02.060 credible.
00:29:04.500 What would happen to
00:29:05.720 AI if AI was known to
00:29:08.480 actually be really,
00:29:09.800 really good as spotting
00:29:11.160 fake news?
00:29:11.860 it would be illegal.
00:29:16.940 It would have to be
00:29:18.160 illegal.
00:29:19.280 Because again, we do
00:29:21.120 not have a system that
00:29:22.160 can survive real news.
00:29:25.100 We can't survive the
00:29:26.400 truth.
00:29:27.860 You know, maybe if we
00:29:28.840 could invent some new
00:29:29.940 system, there might be a
00:29:31.800 different kind of system
00:29:32.700 that can survive accurate
00:29:34.660 news.
00:29:35.300 But we don't have one.
00:29:36.320 It would be hard for the
00:29:41.840 AI to spot missing
00:29:42.980 context.
00:29:44.700 Would it?
00:29:46.900 Would it be hard for the
00:29:48.020 AI to spot missing
00:29:49.220 context?
00:29:52.780 I don't know.
00:29:54.960 Maybe hard, but not
00:29:56.240 impossible.
00:29:59.060 You know, because it's
00:29:59.980 hard for people to do it.
00:30:01.860 Right?
00:30:03.140 How often have I told
00:30:04.440 you, I've got one of
00:30:06.680 these dogs not barking
00:30:07.860 stories, and when you
00:30:09.020 hear it, you say, oh,
00:30:10.420 shoot, that's true.
00:30:12.240 If this story were true,
00:30:14.420 why would we not be
00:30:15.740 hearing about this other
00:30:16.660 thing?
00:30:17.140 Why would there be total
00:30:18.140 silence on this other
00:30:19.280 area?
00:30:20.180 I feel like AI could
00:30:21.240 sometimes get it.
00:30:22.760 But given that one of
00:30:24.460 the things that makes
00:30:25.320 people come to watch
00:30:27.060 this show is that I can
00:30:29.100 do it more often than
00:30:30.080 other people.
00:30:30.640 Meaning I can spot the
00:30:33.020 missing part more
00:30:34.520 reliably than some other
00:30:35.980 people paying attention
00:30:36.880 just because I'm looking
00:30:38.120 for it.
00:30:38.780 I'm actively looking for
00:30:40.020 the missing parts.
00:30:41.720 But maybe AI can learn
00:30:42.900 that.
00:30:45.240 All right.
00:30:47.380 In case you think that
00:30:48.880 the news is a brand
00:30:50.920 new, wonderful spectacle
00:30:52.520 every day, as opposed
00:30:54.580 to the groundhog situation
00:30:56.480 that it really is, where
00:30:58.220 the news just repeats
00:30:59.360 over and over again.
00:31:01.040 Sometimes the dates and
00:31:02.040 the names change, but
00:31:03.020 it's the same news.
00:31:05.320 Would you like to hear
00:31:06.240 some news that you're
00:31:07.140 pretty sure you already
00:31:07.900 heard before and you
00:31:10.180 will hear it again?
00:31:11.360 Just the names and the
00:31:12.340 details will change.
00:31:14.280 All right.
00:31:14.600 Here it comes.
00:31:15.920 According to Carrie
00:31:16.680 Lake, they found a
00:31:17.880 definite strong evidence
00:31:19.740 of irregularity in the
00:31:21.740 Maricopa voting.
00:31:23.200 Does that sound like any
00:31:26.100 story you've ever heard
00:31:27.500 before?
00:31:31.560 It's Kraken version 56.
00:31:35.180 There's the Kraken again.
00:31:37.100 Okay.
00:31:37.440 No, that's not the Kraken.
00:31:38.940 But wait till you see
00:31:39.820 what we got next.
00:31:41.400 I'll agree those other
00:31:42.580 Krakens were not really
00:31:43.840 the Kraken that we hoped.
00:31:45.440 But man, we're Kraken now
00:31:46.780 with our Krakens.
00:31:47.800 Our Krakens are so
00:31:48.760 Kraken.
00:31:49.100 They're just crispy
00:31:51.520 Kraken.
00:31:54.280 Well, I'll say the same
00:31:57.220 thing that I say every
00:31:58.280 time this story comes up
00:31:59.680 because you know it won't
00:32:00.840 be the last time either.
00:32:03.280 The claim is, let's say,
00:32:05.720 captured in documents and
00:32:07.440 captured on video and is
00:32:09.980 unambiguously supportive of
00:32:12.680 the claim.
00:32:13.940 It's kind of complicated,
00:32:15.220 but it has to do with when
00:32:16.240 some of the county machines
00:32:17.880 were tested.
00:32:19.100 And there's some
00:32:20.480 irregularity in the
00:32:21.620 timeline and some things
00:32:23.460 clearly were not
00:32:24.620 according to process.
00:32:26.540 That's the claim.
00:32:28.280 Now, what do you think
00:32:29.740 will happen when all the
00:32:31.540 debunkers and the people
00:32:33.160 who know how stuff work
00:32:34.320 weigh in?
00:32:36.040 Do you think the officials
00:32:37.600 who manage the elections
00:32:39.340 are going to look at this
00:32:40.360 evidence and say,
00:32:41.640 whoa, good point.
00:32:44.320 We never would have
00:32:45.200 caught this.
00:32:46.120 Thank you, Carrie Lake,
00:32:47.260 for bringing this to our
00:32:48.100 attention, but it does
00:32:49.560 appear that some bad
00:32:50.640 actors had reprogrammed
00:32:52.740 some of the counting
00:32:53.660 machines in an
00:32:54.620 inappropriate way that
00:32:55.620 could have changed the
00:32:57.460 results.
00:32:58.740 Do you think that's going
00:32:59.420 to happen?
00:33:00.420 I don't think so.
00:33:02.880 I don't think so.
00:33:04.480 I think it's going to be
00:33:05.380 like every other time.
00:33:06.800 you will see a fact check or
00:33:10.200 set of fact checks that you
00:33:12.060 don't believe, but they
00:33:14.540 will be the official fact
00:33:15.660 checks.
00:33:16.760 And the official fact
00:33:17.800 checks will say, well, it
00:33:20.540 looks like it's sketchy, but
00:33:21.900 that's because you don't
00:33:22.900 understand that the process
00:33:24.960 normally does this.
00:33:26.980 And yes, you might think that
00:33:28.700 this part of the process is
00:33:30.600 suboptimal, but if you check
00:33:32.380 the statutes, you'll see that's
00:33:34.140 allowed.
00:33:35.480 Oh, yes, this does cause
00:33:36.860 some confusion, and
00:33:38.220 possibly this would be an
00:33:39.260 area that somebody could have
00:33:40.820 cheated, but we see no
00:33:42.400 evidence that they did
00:33:43.620 cheat, only evidence that it
00:33:45.900 was possible.
00:33:48.280 Right?
00:33:48.860 You know the whole story.
00:33:50.300 And then if something ever
00:33:51.680 gets to court, you know how
00:33:53.660 that ends.
00:33:54.960 Oh, yes, you made your point,
00:33:57.000 but this court does not judge
00:33:58.780 that point, or we don't have
00:34:01.500 jurisdiction, or you don't
00:34:03.700 have standing.
00:34:05.540 Yeah, the claim might be true, 1.00
00:34:07.380 we're not going to even judge
00:34:08.300 it, because you don't have
00:34:09.540 standing.
00:34:11.120 Right?
00:34:12.040 You know exactly where this is
00:34:13.420 going.
00:34:14.080 It's a big, complicated claim
00:34:16.100 with lots of documentation and
00:34:19.400 video that seem to support the
00:34:23.140 claim.
00:34:24.400 We won't understand the details
00:34:26.020 of it, so people who want to
00:34:28.040 believe it will believe it,
00:34:29.000 people who don't want to
00:34:29.700 believe it will say it's 1.00
00:34:30.420 bullshit. 1.00
00:34:31.560 Then it will go through this 1.00
00:34:32.740 whole checking out phase by
00:34:34.300 the other side, and it will be
00:34:36.040 all confusing.
00:34:37.860 Because I read the story, and
00:34:39.280 it's almost incomprehensible.
00:34:41.880 It's almost incomprehensible.
00:34:43.880 And if Carrie Lake would like
00:34:45.460 some advice on communication,
00:34:48.400 you need to get this on one
00:34:49.860 page.
00:34:52.080 She's got like an extended 0.55
00:34:53.700 video showing all these
00:34:55.380 documents, and parts of the
00:34:57.240 documents are highlighted, and
00:34:59.120 then there's a timeline with all 0.94
00:35:00.520 kinds of shit on it. 0.99
00:35:02.440 I have no idea. 0.99
00:35:05.780 It's something like this.
00:35:08.260 Something like this.
00:35:09.440 This is not it.
00:35:11.160 But it's something like the
00:35:13.440 machines were tested before the
00:35:15.060 election, but then they were
00:35:17.360 altered after the test.
00:35:19.560 Is that close?
00:35:22.080 Has anybody figured out what the
00:35:23.740 claim is yet?
00:35:24.440 That some machines were tested, but
00:35:27.900 then there is documented and
00:35:29.980 videotaped and, you know,
00:35:31.920 incontrovertible evidence that
00:35:34.140 they were reprogrammed again after
00:35:35.780 the test.
00:35:37.700 Right?
00:35:39.340 They were altered after they were
00:35:41.040 certified.
00:35:42.240 Right.
00:35:43.420 So they were certified and then
00:35:46.440 altered.
00:35:46.820 But the way they were altered is
00:35:50.280 going to turn into this.
00:35:51.380 Well, where's your proof that the
00:35:54.220 altering changed the result?
00:35:56.180 Well, we can't prove that.
00:35:57.460 We can only prove that it could
00:35:58.720 have happened and there was no
00:35:59.940 reason to do what they did.
00:36:01.820 Yeah.
00:36:02.600 Yeah, well, they say there's a
00:36:03.840 reason.
00:36:04.680 Yeah, but there isn't a good
00:36:05.520 reason.
00:36:06.220 Yeah, but, you know, they say
00:36:07.620 there is a reason.
00:36:09.440 But it's not a good reason.
00:36:11.400 But they have a reason.
00:36:13.960 And then they'll say, where's your
00:36:16.060 evidence that they did, in fact,
00:36:17.660 use this opening to change the
00:36:19.780 result?
00:36:20.760 Well, we don't have that, but it
00:36:22.180 was illegal.
00:36:23.540 So you should overturn it because
00:36:25.480 it was illegal.
00:36:27.080 Do you think the court is going to
00:36:28.340 overturn an election that's been
00:36:30.620 certified for two years?
00:36:33.420 Or whatever it is by the time they
00:36:34.840 get around to it?
00:36:36.220 No.
00:36:36.920 No, the courts will.
00:36:38.520 And I'm not sure this is wrong, by
00:36:40.000 the way.
00:36:40.560 I don't know that this would be a
00:36:42.220 bad move by the courts.
00:36:43.820 Courts like stability.
00:36:45.860 They like the system to be stable.
00:36:47.600 All other things being equal.
00:36:51.280 So the most stability they could
00:36:53.700 add to the system would be to not
00:36:55.540 overturn the election.
00:36:57.420 So I think the courts would find a
00:36:59.340 reason to not overturn the
00:37:00.820 election.
00:37:02.360 Worst case scenario, or the most
00:37:04.160 aggressive thing they might do, 0.93
00:37:06.080 is say, you know, you ought to look
00:37:07.540 into changing that.
00:37:09.560 You've got a process there that
00:37:11.080 maybe you ought to keep out of the
00:37:12.540 courts.
00:37:13.600 Maybe modify that a little bit for
00:37:15.320 next time.
00:37:15.780 That's it.
00:37:17.420 And then do you think they'll
00:37:18.420 modify it for next time?
00:37:20.460 Of course not.
00:37:22.040 Of course not.
00:37:23.360 Why would they?
00:37:26.600 So this is one of those stories
00:37:27.920 where you can pretty much judge from
00:37:29.480 the very first word where it will
00:37:32.000 go.
00:37:33.000 And it has nothing to do with
00:37:34.360 whether the claim is valid or
00:37:36.040 invalid.
00:37:36.660 That I don't know.
00:37:38.040 But regardless of whether the claim
00:37:39.600 is valid or invalid, it will go down
00:37:43.580 the invalid pathway, because that's
00:37:45.660 the only one there is.
00:37:47.060 There's not a pathway for a valid
00:37:48.840 claim to go anywhere.
00:37:50.780 Is there?
00:37:52.220 Except to conspiracy theory books
00:37:54.420 that some people believe and other
00:37:55.840 people don't.
00:37:57.860 So nothing, I think nothing will be
00:37:59.780 done.
00:38:01.340 But they might have found, they
00:38:02.920 might have found the footprints of
00:38:04.200 the Kraken.
00:38:05.900 But the footprints don't prove the
00:38:07.520 Kraken.
00:38:07.840 They just might have some footprints.
00:38:11.880 All right.
00:38:14.760 NVIDIA has a new technology that
00:38:17.840 lets gamers talk to the NPCs in
00:38:20.880 your game.
00:38:22.540 Now, you could probably do that for a
00:38:24.480 while now.
00:38:25.460 But now the NPCs will have full AI
00:38:28.720 kind of conversational talents.
00:38:32.160 So they can now make you an NPC, a
00:38:35.520 non-player character, in a game that
00:38:38.380 will look and act like a person.
00:38:41.960 But you don't live in a simulation, do
00:38:44.260 you?
00:38:45.200 No, this isn't a simulation.
00:38:47.180 Of course not.
00:38:50.460 How much longer can we watch our
00:38:52.900 technology build simulations before
00:38:56.480 you realize that you're in one?
00:38:58.660 How much further can we push this?
00:39:00.540 Has anybody flipped over to believing
00:39:06.700 that we're a simulation because of AI's
00:39:10.260 success lately, especially the deep
00:39:13.240 fakes?
00:39:14.160 Is there anybody who changed their mind
00:39:15.520 recently?
00:39:17.100 I see one yes.
00:39:20.460 Mostly no's.
00:39:23.180 All right.
00:39:24.460 So here's my speculation.
00:39:27.320 My speculation is that we will someday
00:39:30.740 come to the belief that we are a
00:39:32.640 simulation.
00:39:33.680 In other words, I believe that will be a
00:39:35.480 common understanding at some point.
00:39:40.140 But to get there, we will have to get
00:39:43.520 closer and closer to creating our own
00:39:45.760 simulation with characters who believe
00:39:48.760 they're real, that we can observe and
00:39:51.300 then watch them acting just the way we do.
00:39:53.980 You'd be looking at them and you'd say,
00:39:55.220 wait a minute, they just formed a
00:39:57.720 religion.
00:39:59.400 You're going to watch them do everything
00:40:00.720 we would do.
00:40:01.880 And then you will know you are a
00:40:04.240 simulation.
00:40:06.260 Admit you believe in God.
00:40:07.760 Well, I believe that we are created by a 0.75
00:40:10.100 higher power, but probably somebody who's
00:40:13.720 not that different from us.
00:40:15.360 And I also believe that humans have now
00:40:19.220 achieved God-like powers.
00:40:20.740 That's right.
00:40:25.420 Humans now have God powers.
00:40:27.960 Because what is a God power?
00:40:29.600 God power would be to create a universe,
00:40:31.760 right?
00:40:32.380 Well, we can do that now.
00:40:34.000 We can do that.
00:40:34.860 You can create a simulated universe.
00:40:37.360 God power is only God can make a tree.
00:40:40.980 Right?
00:40:41.940 Well, we can do that.
00:40:43.380 I can make a tree that the characters in
00:40:45.340 my simulation believe is a tree.
00:40:46.880 And they would have no evidence otherwise.
00:40:50.640 So we have now achieved God-like power.
00:40:53.960 However, here's the irony.
00:40:55.820 It doesn't apply to our own existence.
00:40:58.780 It's a God-like power that we can only
00:41:00.900 apply to the world that we create for
00:41:03.380 that purpose.
00:41:04.300 But we can't use those powers in our own
00:41:07.340 world.
00:41:09.820 Unless the affirmations are that power.
00:41:13.320 Sometimes I think we can.
00:41:14.580 All right.
00:41:16.880 We have an insider report on Trump's opinion
00:41:24.660 of Tim Scott.
00:41:26.240 And there's a quote that could be fake news
00:41:29.400 because it comes from an anonymous source.
00:41:31.620 But it sounds true. 0.94
00:41:34.160 And the quote was from allegedly from Trump
00:41:38.180 about Tim Scott.
00:41:40.060 Quote, I like him.
00:41:41.380 We're just going to say nice things about
00:41:43.300 Tim.
00:41:43.560 Now, let's see if there's a parallel here.
00:41:50.140 So Ron DeSantis was pro-Trump,
00:41:53.120 but then decided to run against him.
00:41:56.080 And then Trump called him disloyal.
00:41:59.840 Is that correct so far, right?
00:42:02.440 Then Tim Scott, who has worked productively
00:42:05.340 with Trump, enough so that Trump still likes him,
00:42:07.840 decides to run against Trump.
00:42:11.680 And Trump does not call him disloyal.
00:42:14.380 Huh.
00:42:15.480 Huh.
00:42:17.700 Foreshadowing.
00:42:18.900 Follow the foreshadowing.
00:42:21.540 Let's see.
00:42:22.300 One person is disloyal.
00:42:24.800 And the person who did the same kind of similar things,
00:42:28.060 not disloyal at all.
00:42:29.240 Nice guy.
00:42:29.760 They like him.
00:42:30.180 I feel like your next vice president is lining up.
00:42:37.260 At the very least,
00:42:39.520 Trump has him on his shortest of the short list.
00:42:42.560 Would you agree?
00:42:44.720 At the very least,
00:42:46.180 Tim Scott is on the shortest of the short list.
00:42:48.800 He's top three, no question about it.
00:42:52.520 And then,
00:42:53.600 who's the other gentleman?
00:42:58.180 Donaldson.
00:42:58.620 Is it Donaldson?
00:43:00.640 No, Donaldson, right?
00:43:03.820 The other Trump supporter from,
00:43:06.260 Byron Donaldson, right?
00:43:07.880 And Byron Donaldson's been getting,
00:43:09.840 Byron Donalds, I'm sorry.
00:43:11.560 Byron Donalds.
00:43:13.540 That is the correct name.
00:43:16.700 And he's been getting a lot of attention
00:43:18.180 just by being good at his job.
00:43:20.880 Meaning he's communicating really well.
00:43:23.640 And he's presenting his side
00:43:26.160 and his team's side of the argument
00:43:27.680 in arguments that people are,
00:43:30.360 you know,
00:43:31.080 we're finding compatible with our own thinking,
00:43:34.040 let's say.
00:43:35.040 So,
00:43:35.880 he's a really strong
00:43:37.400 personality.
00:43:40.960 But I don't know that he's as seasoned
00:43:42.860 or as credible as Tim Scott.
00:43:45.420 Because, you know,
00:43:46.400 you like a senator better than a congressperson, right?
00:43:50.900 Yeah,
00:43:51.360 and you don't want to have too many Donalds in your ticket.
00:43:56.360 I mean,
00:43:57.140 it bothers me enough that there might be a Scott on the ticket.
00:44:00.300 That's going to bug me enough.
00:44:03.040 Yep,
00:44:03.480 Tim's a bachelor,
00:44:04.420 but we don't care.
00:44:05.180 Which is actually another advantage.
00:44:10.580 I would love,
00:44:12.340 well,
00:44:12.620 I hate to say this,
00:44:14.040 but,
00:44:14.980 yeah,
00:44:15.280 let's leave Tim Scott's personal life alone.
00:44:18.380 What do you think?
00:44:20.140 Do you think that's a,
00:44:21.320 do you think that's something we should do?
00:44:24.160 Just leave Tim Scott,
00:44:25.540 his personal life alone.
00:44:27.680 Let it just be whatever it is.
00:44:29.700 Whatever it is,
00:44:30.300 because conservatives can't be consistent
00:44:34.560 with their own,
00:44:35.700 their own philosophies
00:44:37.060 if they get too interested in that,
00:44:39.580 right?
00:44:40.180 If you get too interested,
00:44:42.020 you're not being consistent
00:44:43.220 with your own principles.
00:44:45.300 You should be aggressively uninterested
00:44:47.660 in that question.
00:44:48.900 Aggressively uninterested.
00:44:51.220 And let's see if we can maintain that.
00:44:53.740 I feel like that would be the
00:44:54.920 consistent way to be a conservative,
00:44:57.960 to be aggressively uninterested
00:44:59.700 in somebody who's minding
00:45:00.880 their own business,
00:45:02.380 minding their own business,
00:45:04.200 and being a good patriot.
00:45:06.620 What else do you want?
00:45:08.640 Doesn't bother you.
00:45:10.180 Good patriot.
00:45:11.760 We're done here.
00:45:14.980 All right.
00:45:16.360 And by the way,
00:45:17.240 we don't,
00:45:17.740 I'm not making any assumptions
00:45:19.600 about Tim Scott's private life.
00:45:22.600 That's part of the deal too,
00:45:23.920 is that I don't even have to make an assumption.
00:45:26.400 I can just say none of my business
00:45:27.640 and get on with it.
00:45:29.700 All right.
00:45:32.660 Did you see a,
00:45:34.200 there was a video from Dylan Mulvaney
00:45:36.440 talking about,
00:45:40.140 informed his parents
00:45:41.300 that he might be interested in women.
00:45:44.380 And then talked about,
00:45:46.380 Dylan talked about the transition from,
00:45:50.220 I believe,
00:45:52.760 Dylan claimed to be gay,
00:45:55.000 and then claimed to be queer,
00:45:56.840 then claimed to be non-binary,
00:45:58.680 and then claimed to be trans,
00:46:00.720 and now is questioning whether
00:46:02.860 she likes women. 1.00
00:46:09.660 So,
00:46:10.600 does it,
00:46:12.320 does it feel to you
00:46:13.980 that this is more about a theater
00:46:16.500 and less about
00:46:17.700 somebody's personal decisions?
00:46:20.820 It's just theater.
00:46:22.740 Yeah.
00:46:24.940 I don't know how we ever came
00:46:26.540 to care so much.
00:46:28.040 Well,
00:46:28.280 I guess I do know.
00:46:29.720 It's not,
00:46:30.360 none of this was about
00:46:31.440 Dylan Mulvaney,
00:46:32.360 right?
00:46:33.640 Let's be honest.
00:46:34.920 When I got canceled,
00:46:36.720 it wasn't really about me at all.
00:46:38.560 I was just a vehicle
00:46:39.800 that people could put their feelings in,
00:46:42.100 and,
00:46:42.600 you know,
00:46:43.000 it'd be like a little truck
00:46:43.940 that could take us somewhere.
00:46:44.800 I think Dylan Mulvaney
00:46:46.520 is the same thing.
00:46:47.640 Literally,
00:46:48.220 nobody cares about
00:46:49.180 Dylan's private life.
00:46:51.700 Nobody.
00:46:52.960 But Dylan is,
00:46:53.880 like me,
00:46:54.500 a little truck
00:46:55.180 that you can put your
00:46:56.140 political opinions in
00:46:57.820 and take it somewhere.
00:47:00.160 So,
00:47:01.980 you said you thought
00:47:04.580 you was gay. 0.99
00:47:05.460 Well, 0.98
00:47:05.620 that's what Dylan says.
00:47:07.480 Dylan thought Dylan was gay,
00:47:09.440 and then thought Dylan was queer,
00:47:11.880 and then non-binary,
00:47:12.680 and now Dylan thinks
00:47:14.280 Dylan is trans, 0.79
00:47:16.100 but maybe a trans lesbian. 1.00
00:47:18.740 I don't know.
00:47:19.180 I'm not sure how that works.
00:47:23.000 But,
00:47:23.840 so,
00:47:24.680 in case you're wondering,
00:47:25.660 in the,
00:47:25.920 in the Dilbert
00:47:27.400 reborn comic
00:47:29.040 that you can only see
00:47:30.080 if you're subscribing
00:47:31.120 on either
00:47:32.500 the Locals platform
00:47:33.520 where you get
00:47:34.060 lots more than Dilbert,
00:47:35.580 or on the
00:47:36.480 Twitter platform,
00:47:38.760 you can subscribe.
00:47:40.340 I've got a subscribe button
00:47:41.500 in my profile.
00:47:43.120 And you can see
00:47:43.720 just the Dilbert Reborn comic,
00:47:45.100 but I'll tell you
00:47:46.100 about an upcoming
00:47:46.700 week.
00:47:49.740 Dilbert's company
00:47:50.400 is going to hire
00:47:51.480 a new head of marketing,
00:47:53.760 a new head of marketing
00:47:56.200 who is a woman,
00:47:59.000 and she's in charge
00:48:00.120 of their marketing
00:48:01.360 for the Power Tools Division.
00:48:03.680 So,
00:48:04.180 they're going to get
00:48:04.600 a woman vice president
00:48:05.700 in charge of the
00:48:06.240 Power Tools Division,
00:48:07.100 and her first
00:48:09.460 suggestion
00:48:10.520 will be to hire
00:48:11.320 Dylan Mulvaney
00:48:12.260 as an influencer
00:48:13.960 for their Power Tools.
00:48:17.880 So,
00:48:18.400 that's what you're missing
00:48:19.100 if you don't subscribe.
00:48:23.200 It goes great,
00:48:24.340 by the way.
00:48:25.200 It just goes great.
00:48:26.120 All right.
00:48:33.100 Yes,
00:48:33.620 we don't need to make
00:48:34.440 sex tool
00:48:39.220 accusations
00:48:40.760 just because
00:48:41.400 it's Power Tools.
00:48:44.660 All right.
00:48:45.300 now that,
00:48:47.300 ladies and gentlemen,
00:48:49.020 brings me to the end
00:48:49.980 of my prepared remarks
00:48:51.120 on this Memorial Day.
00:48:54.260 Is there any
00:48:55.040 story that I missed
00:48:56.180 that you need to
00:48:56.960 get my valuable
00:48:58.700 opinion on?
00:49:01.420 All right.
00:49:01.680 It took about
00:49:02.180 two minutes
00:49:02.780 for somebody
00:49:03.240 to mention
00:49:03.660 Snap-On Tools.
00:49:05.760 That took longer
00:49:06.980 than I thought.
00:49:12.020 All right.
00:49:12.720 UAP,
00:49:17.640 the UAPs.
00:49:18.840 You know,
00:49:19.260 I saw Elon Musk
00:49:20.760 on some interview
00:49:22.040 he did recently
00:49:22.700 where it appears
00:49:24.360 he's become
00:49:25.140 a believer
00:49:27.000 in the
00:49:27.740 pre-Ice Age
00:49:28.940 advanced
00:49:29.760 civilization
00:49:30.540 concept.
00:49:32.160 Have you all
00:49:32.680 been watching that?
00:49:33.820 It's mostly
00:49:34.360 a YouTube thing.
00:49:35.900 There are a whole
00:49:36.260 bunch of videos,
00:49:37.300 people taking
00:49:37.840 different positions
00:49:38.660 on how,
00:49:41.840 and I guess
00:49:42.560 Elon Musk
00:49:43.100 gave the one
00:49:43.780 example that's
00:49:44.680 in some of
00:49:45.140 these videos
00:49:45.680 that I think
00:49:47.560 it was the
00:49:48.120 skill of writing
00:49:49.540 popped up
00:49:51.200 in different
00:49:51.760 civilizations
00:49:52.860 all over the
00:49:53.760 world at the
00:49:54.300 same time.
00:49:55.580 And it couldn't
00:49:56.420 have been a
00:49:56.760 coincidence
00:49:57.060 because they
00:49:57.680 didn't have
00:49:58.000 any connection.
00:50:00.360 And how could
00:50:01.040 humans be evolving
00:50:02.080 for, you know,
00:50:03.080 hundreds of
00:50:03.680 thousands of years
00:50:04.400 then just about
00:50:05.180 the same time
00:50:06.000 they develop
00:50:07.540 writing skills
00:50:08.440 in different
00:50:09.600 places?
00:50:10.060 Now the
00:50:11.240 suspicion is
00:50:12.220 that there
00:50:13.400 was some
00:50:13.740 advanced
00:50:14.300 race that
00:50:15.960 was on
00:50:16.320 Earth and
00:50:16.860 got wiped
00:50:17.260 out by the
00:50:18.080 Ice Age 0.94
00:50:18.660 changes,
00:50:19.780 and maybe
00:50:21.360 there were
00:50:21.680 some survivors
00:50:22.460 or some
00:50:23.500 missionaries
00:50:24.100 who, you
00:50:25.000 know, took
00:50:25.420 their knowledge
00:50:26.080 to other
00:50:26.440 places or
00:50:27.040 whatever.
00:50:28.040 Maybe.
00:50:29.960 Yeah, Graham
00:50:30.540 Hancock is on
00:50:31.340 that.
00:50:31.960 So part of
00:50:32.440 that belief is
00:50:33.060 that the
00:50:33.440 Sphinx was 1.00
00:50:34.960 not built by
00:50:35.600 the Egyptians
00:50:36.280 or anybody
00:50:37.060 that they
00:50:37.540 could remember.
00:50:39.040 But they
00:50:39.380 sort of claimed
00:50:40.040 it because
00:50:40.820 it was on
00:50:41.200 their territory
00:50:41.840 and that it
00:50:43.400 might have
00:50:43.620 been some
00:50:43.900 advanced
00:50:44.400 civilization.
00:50:46.500 Now the
00:50:46.780 pyramids
00:50:47.140 themselves, I
00:50:47.780 think, are
00:50:48.320 a little sketchy,
00:50:49.120 aren't they?
00:50:50.840 Because it
00:50:52.460 almost looks
00:50:53.140 like the
00:50:53.520 pyramids were
00:50:54.120 built for
00:50:54.600 one purpose
00:50:55.300 and then the
00:50:57.100 kings used
00:50:58.300 them for
00:50:58.620 another purpose
00:50:59.260 which is they
00:51:00.160 buried themselves
00:51:00.860 inside them.
00:51:01.960 It doesn't
00:51:02.380 even look like
00:51:02.900 they were built
00:51:03.480 for the purpose
00:51:04.520 of burial
00:51:05.100 tubes.
00:51:05.460 It was like
00:51:06.360 they had
00:51:06.580 some bigger
00:51:07.040 purpose.
00:51:08.560 So we're
00:51:09.320 seeing all
00:51:09.720 these hints
00:51:10.220 that maybe
00:51:11.000 Atlantis was
00:51:11.800 real, maybe
00:51:13.000 there was more
00:51:13.480 than one
00:51:13.820 Atlantis, maybe
00:51:15.260 they had some
00:51:15.700 advanced
00:51:16.040 civilization.
00:51:17.520 Now connect
00:51:18.140 that to the
00:51:19.080 UFO spottings
00:51:20.600 we've had.
00:51:22.040 And the one
00:51:22.540 thing that we
00:51:22.960 hear more than
00:51:23.480 other things is
00:51:24.220 that they must
00:51:25.460 be drones
00:51:26.200 because the
00:51:27.660 way they move
00:51:28.360 no human
00:51:29.140 could survive
00:51:29.820 the G-forces
00:51:30.640 or no organic
00:51:31.780 entity.
00:51:32.780 So they think
00:51:33.700 it must be
00:51:34.160 all mechanical
00:51:34.880 because it
00:51:36.040 moves too
00:51:36.440 fast.
00:51:37.420 And some
00:51:38.040 of them
00:51:38.340 will swim
00:51:39.400 underwater,
00:51:40.860 they say.
00:51:43.080 So what
00:51:44.780 do you think
00:51:45.100 is more
00:51:45.420 likely?
00:51:46.720 There's some
00:51:47.500 leftover drones
00:51:48.540 from an advanced
00:51:49.420 civilization that
00:51:50.500 might be just
00:51:51.020 on autopilot.
00:51:53.320 They might be
00:51:53.920 either servicing
00:51:54.820 themselves and
00:51:55.720 maintaining
00:51:56.280 themselves in
00:51:57.100 some underground
00:51:58.340 factory that's
00:51:59.940 just operating
00:52:01.780 since the
00:52:02.500 people who
00:52:03.220 built it
00:52:03.640 all died.
00:52:04.820 It just
00:52:05.180 keeps going.
00:52:06.360 And it's
00:52:06.960 just doing
00:52:07.380 its routine.
00:52:09.060 All it's
00:52:09.500 doing is
00:52:09.940 sending out
00:52:10.640 some drones
00:52:11.620 to look at
00:52:12.140 stuff and
00:52:12.560 coming back.
00:52:13.680 It doesn't
00:52:14.120 have any
00:52:14.400 purpose,
00:52:15.300 but it
00:52:15.620 doesn't know
00:52:16.040 it has no
00:52:16.480 purpose.
00:52:19.200 That would
00:52:19.760 explain everything,
00:52:20.620 wouldn't it?
00:52:21.700 It would explain
00:52:22.400 all of the
00:52:23.260 Atlantis
00:52:24.320 missing civilization,
00:52:25.460 and it would
00:52:26.740 explain why
00:52:27.320 we have
00:52:27.720 UFOs and
00:52:29.300 yet no
00:52:29.960 visits from
00:52:30.680 any creatures.
00:52:33.220 How could
00:52:33.580 we have so
00:52:34.020 many UFOs
00:52:35.000 but nobody
00:52:35.680 has tried to
00:52:36.060 make contact?
00:52:37.460 And the
00:52:37.780 most logical
00:52:38.620 explanation is
00:52:39.780 there's nobody
00:52:41.560 to contact.
00:52:44.600 Isn't it?
00:52:46.040 If you have
00:52:46.780 to look at
00:52:47.100 all the
00:52:47.360 possibilities,
00:52:48.960 let's say you
00:52:49.700 accepted, I
00:52:50.420 don't accept
00:52:50.960 this as true,
00:52:51.860 but if you
00:52:52.400 did accept
00:52:52.940 it's true that
00:52:54.120 there are a
00:52:54.440 bunch of
00:52:54.760 UFOs that
00:52:55.440 are legitimately
00:52:56.240 high-tech
00:52:57.640 objects that
00:52:59.620 are moving
00:53:00.020 in a way
00:53:00.420 that an
00:53:01.160 organic
00:53:01.780 creature could
00:53:02.820 not survive.
00:53:06.920 I think
00:53:07.720 that's the
00:53:08.100 most likely
00:53:08.740 possibility is
00:53:09.760 that there
00:53:10.200 is some
00:53:11.120 kind of
00:53:11.500 leftover
00:53:11.900 technology
00:53:12.660 from an
00:53:13.740 Earth
00:53:14.020 civilization
00:53:14.640 that found
00:53:16.680 a way to
00:53:17.120 keep its
00:53:17.540 drones running
00:53:18.400 and maybe
00:53:19.600 self-maintain
00:53:20.460 them.
00:53:21.280 We might
00:53:21.680 find someday
00:53:22.360 there's an
00:53:22.940 undersea
00:53:23.460 factory where
00:53:24.980 their robots
00:53:25.740 were repairing
00:53:26.380 themselves and
00:53:27.400 they got
00:53:28.740 spare parts
00:53:29.580 and for
00:53:30.600 100,000
00:53:31.280 years they've
00:53:32.880 just been
00:53:33.380 doing their
00:53:33.780 robot thing
00:53:34.360 under there.
00:53:36.580 They don't
00:53:37.200 have any
00:53:37.500 reason to
00:53:38.000 contact us
00:53:38.780 because that
00:53:39.580 was never
00:53:39.960 their programming.
00:53:41.360 They're not
00:53:41.840 designed to
00:53:42.360 contact anybody.
00:53:43.560 They're just
00:53:43.940 designed to
00:53:44.420 go look
00:53:44.740 around and
00:53:45.200 make some
00:53:45.520 videos and
00:53:46.140 record them
00:53:46.760 and then
00:53:47.160 they do
00:53:47.400 it again.
00:53:47.720 That's
00:53:51.640 Horizon Zero
00:53:52.840 Dawn.
00:53:54.040 What is
00:53:54.240 that?
00:53:57.560 Modern
00:53:58.040 Romans have 0.99
00:53:58.720 no knowledge
00:53:59.320 of Romans
00:53:59.840 who built
00:54:00.260 the stadium.
00:54:01.520 But the
00:54:02.140 stadium isn't
00:54:02.900 really amazing.
00:54:04.860 I think that
00:54:05.360 was more in
00:54:06.040 line with what
00:54:06.680 they knew how
00:54:07.120 to do in
00:54:07.480 the day.
00:54:09.380 What's a
00:54:09.960 video game?
00:54:11.640 How does
00:54:12.180 that jive
00:54:12.660 with simulation
00:54:13.400 theory?
00:54:14.740 Well,
00:54:15.260 whatever it
00:54:15.800 is, this
00:54:16.140 could be the
00:54:16.580 simulation.
00:54:17.000 Now, in
00:54:18.000 simulation
00:54:18.520 theory, I
00:54:19.400 say the
00:54:19.840 most provocative
00:54:20.620 thing that
00:54:21.680 nobody else
00:54:22.280 says about
00:54:22.720 the simulation.
00:54:24.480 At least I've
00:54:25.040 never heard it.
00:54:26.360 And to me, it's
00:54:27.480 a way to prove
00:54:28.020 the simulation.
00:54:29.840 It goes like
00:54:30.660 this.
00:54:31.160 If we are a
00:54:31.900 simulation, we
00:54:33.460 don't have a
00:54:34.180 past because we
00:54:37.840 would have been
00:54:38.320 created out of
00:54:39.940 nothing.
00:54:40.600 So the past
00:54:41.520 just didn't
00:54:42.140 exist at the
00:54:43.560 moment of
00:54:43.980 creation.
00:54:45.260 But since in
00:54:46.780 order to feel
00:54:47.400 like we're
00:54:47.800 real characters,
00:54:48.460 we would have
00:54:49.060 to believe we
00:54:49.680 had a past,
00:54:50.700 the simulation
00:54:51.640 would create
00:54:52.560 the past on
00:54:54.180 demand.
00:54:55.680 So my
00:54:56.500 example of
00:54:57.000 that is if
00:54:57.580 you've never
00:54:58.140 dug a hole
00:54:58.740 in your
00:54:59.060 backyard, there's
00:55:00.700 nothing under
00:55:01.260 there.
00:55:02.860 You start
00:55:03.640 digging, and
00:55:04.560 as you dig,
00:55:05.400 the simulation
00:55:05.980 fills in the
00:55:06.700 hole.
00:55:07.480 I mean, it
00:55:08.000 creates the
00:55:08.580 detail that
00:55:09.880 looks like,
00:55:10.380 hey, I
00:55:11.400 found a
00:55:12.020 fossil in
00:55:12.580 here.
00:55:13.360 Yeah, right.
00:55:13.780 So you
00:55:14.040 find a
00:55:14.380 dinosaur
00:55:14.740 bone, and
00:55:16.460 then the
00:55:17.900 simulation has
00:55:18.980 to recreate
00:55:19.540 the dinosaur.
00:55:21.520 But it
00:55:22.060 won't recreate
00:55:22.660 anything until
00:55:23.340 you need it.
00:55:24.580 So the past
00:55:25.480 is an
00:55:26.440 invention of
00:55:27.260 the current
00:55:28.460 times.
00:55:29.740 So the
00:55:30.420 question was,
00:55:31.160 how did the
00:55:31.760 theory that
00:55:32.460 there were
00:55:33.040 ancient,
00:55:33.920 advanced
00:55:34.300 civilizations,
00:55:35.500 how does
00:55:35.880 that fit into
00:55:36.460 simulation
00:55:36.980 theory?
00:55:37.960 It fits this
00:55:38.840 way.
00:55:39.960 There were
00:55:40.640 no advanced
00:55:41.400 civilizations.
00:55:42.080 civilizations.
00:55:43.040 We're
00:55:43.400 creating them
00:55:44.320 now.
00:55:45.540 We are
00:55:46.240 creating them
00:55:47.120 out of our
00:55:47.660 minds, and
00:55:48.540 now they're
00:55:48.900 becoming real.
00:55:50.420 So there
00:55:50.860 will be an
00:55:51.800 Atlantis
00:55:52.320 eventually,
00:55:53.800 but not
00:55:55.160 yet.
00:55:57.220 In other
00:55:57.700 words, there
00:55:58.160 will be an
00:55:59.320 Atlantis in
00:56:00.220 our past,
00:56:01.200 because we're
00:56:01.760 in the process
00:56:02.640 of creating
00:56:03.840 it, but it
00:56:06.060 does not
00:56:06.560 exist in our
00:56:07.280 past yet.
00:56:09.940 In other
00:56:10.320 words, the
00:56:11.020 past will be
00:56:11.840 created in
00:56:12.440 our future,
00:56:14.160 and it's
00:56:14.600 the only
00:56:15.080 way it
00:56:15.480 can work.
00:56:16.660 It can't
00:56:17.180 work any
00:56:17.540 other way.
00:56:18.400 And the
00:56:18.800 reason it
00:56:19.100 can't work
00:56:19.440 any other
00:56:19.800 way is that
00:56:20.380 no simulation
00:56:21.160 could put
00:56:22.740 everything in
00:56:23.660 the universe
00:56:24.160 and hold it
00:56:25.620 in its mind
00:56:26.320 and rotate
00:56:27.300 it and keep
00:56:28.180 it consistent
00:56:28.740 with everything
00:56:29.280 else in the
00:56:29.740 universe,
00:56:30.480 because the
00:56:31.200 computing
00:56:31.680 requirement would
00:56:32.580 be too
00:56:32.880 massive.
00:56:34.140 So instead,
00:56:35.080 what the
00:56:35.740 software does
00:56:36.680 is exactly
00:56:37.360 what a video
00:56:37.960 game does.
00:56:39.120 It creates
00:56:39.640 a little
00:56:40.000 universe,
00:56:40.560 and it
00:56:41.100 doesn't let
00:56:41.560 you get
00:56:41.840 outside of
00:56:42.400 its barriers.
00:56:44.480 So we
00:56:45.880 believe that
00:56:47.780 when we
00:56:48.200 see light
00:56:48.720 from a
00:56:49.100 star,
00:56:50.880 we believe
00:56:52.860 that there's
00:56:53.380 an actual
00:56:53.840 planet or
00:56:55.180 sun up
00:56:55.560 there,
00:56:56.540 but maybe
00:56:57.460 not.
00:56:58.640 Maybe it's
00:56:59.220 just light.
00:57:01.160 And there
00:57:01.860 wouldn't be a
00:57:02.320 planet there
00:57:02.840 unless we
00:57:03.360 built a
00:57:04.020 technology
00:57:04.580 where we
00:57:05.580 could follow
00:57:06.860 that light
00:57:07.340 back to its
00:57:07.940 source,
00:57:09.120 and as
00:57:09.660 we
00:57:09.820 approach
00:57:10.200 the
00:57:10.420 source,
00:57:11.360 the planet
00:57:11.920 or the
00:57:12.440 star would
00:57:13.080 appear in
00:57:14.200 the real
00:57:14.560 world for
00:57:15.700 the first
00:57:16.080 time.
00:57:17.080 It wasn't
00:57:17.800 there until
00:57:18.180 you looked
00:57:18.500 at it.
00:57:21.840 All right.
00:57:23.180 God is
00:57:23.640 outside of
00:57:24.140 time.
00:57:24.840 Yes,
00:57:25.200 that would
00:57:25.540 be similar
00:57:26.160 to a
00:57:26.920 simulation.
00:57:28.480 So if we
00:57:29.180 were to
00:57:29.480 build a
00:57:29.840 simulation,
00:57:31.120 the simulation
00:57:31.740 sense of
00:57:32.400 time would
00:57:32.840 not be the
00:57:33.280 same as
00:57:33.720 our time,
00:57:34.440 the creator's.
00:57:35.040 we would
00:57:35.720 be outside
00:57:36.340 of their
00:57:37.840 time.
00:57:38.580 In fact,
00:57:39.020 you could
00:57:39.380 fast-forward
00:57:40.060 their time
00:57:40.720 so that
00:57:41.680 they're at
00:57:41.980 ten times
00:57:42.480 the time
00:57:42.900 of the
00:57:43.120 creator's
00:57:43.560 time,
00:57:44.280 and they
00:57:44.600 wouldn't
00:57:44.780 know the
00:57:45.060 difference.
00:57:46.140 As long
00:57:46.740 as everything
00:57:47.280 got moved
00:57:49.960 forward at
00:57:50.740 the same
00:57:51.120 rate,
00:57:53.140 their car
00:57:53.660 would still
00:57:54.060 look like
00:57:54.440 it's going
00:57:54.860 65 miles
00:57:55.780 an hour.
00:57:56.440 They wouldn't
00:57:57.020 know that
00:57:57.360 it's going
00:57:57.720 1,000 miles
00:57:58.440 an hour.
00:57:59.140 They would
00:57:59.400 have no way
00:57:59.820 to know.
00:58:00.540 Because it's
00:58:00.960 only going
00:58:01.360 1,000 miles
00:58:02.060 an hour
00:58:02.360 outside the
00:58:03.300 simulation.
00:58:05.040 There's
00:58:05.620 no preferred
00:58:07.020 speed.
00:58:08.560 There's
00:58:08.940 only the
00:58:09.360 speed from
00:58:10.060 the perspective
00:58:10.700 of the
00:58:11.320 observer.
00:58:12.980 Take that,
00:58:13.640 Einstein.
00:58:17.480 All right.
00:58:19.360 What about
00:58:19.960 the mycelium
00:58:20.720 theory?
00:58:23.380 Well,
00:58:24.260 that is how
00:58:24.960 I will power
00:58:25.760 my mycelium
00:58:26.960 drive in my
00:58:27.680 spaceship.
00:58:28.940 But beyond
00:58:29.360 that, that's
00:58:29.840 all I know.
00:58:32.820 Do we get
00:58:33.640 to know when
00:58:34.240 we're buffering?
00:58:35.920 I don't
00:58:36.560 think we
00:58:36.900 would, because
00:58:37.720 if you
00:58:39.100 imagine that
00:58:39.760 we're
00:58:40.200 artificial, if
00:58:41.880 we all
00:58:42.260 stopped at
00:58:42.800 the same
00:58:43.160 time, because
00:58:44.120 the processor
00:58:44.760 stopped, and
00:58:46.880 then we
00:58:47.240 immediately
00:58:47.620 started at
00:58:48.340 the same
00:58:48.660 time, we
00:58:50.260 wouldn't know
00:58:50.700 that we
00:58:50.960 never stopped.
00:59:01.600 Was
00:59:02.080 yesterday a
00:59:02.740 simulation?
00:59:05.040 Well, yesterday
00:59:08.320 doesn't have
00:59:09.040 to have
00:59:10.480 been fake,
00:59:12.020 because once
00:59:12.620 you do it,
00:59:13.080 it's real.
00:59:14.720 Ish.
00:59:17.120 Why did the
00:59:17.980 simulation
00:59:18.400 rig the
00:59:18.880 election?
00:59:20.200 Well, all
00:59:21.220 right, here's
00:59:21.660 a real
00:59:22.580 mind-blower.
00:59:23.840 If we're a
00:59:24.560 simulation, which
00:59:25.480 is what I
00:59:25.900 believe, it
00:59:27.200 can be true
00:59:28.040 that the
00:59:28.600 election was
00:59:29.240 not rigged,
00:59:30.080 and also
00:59:31.220 that it
00:59:31.640 was rigged.
00:59:33.920 And it's
00:59:34.800 like a
00:59:35.080 Schrodinger's
00:59:35.620 cat situation.
00:59:36.800 So until you
00:59:37.620 can find
00:59:38.220 evidence that
00:59:39.160 would convince
00:59:39.720 everybody that
00:59:40.460 they're looking
00:59:41.040 at the same
00:59:41.580 thing, here
00:59:43.020 it is.
00:59:44.360 If you can't
00:59:45.260 produce that,
00:59:46.040 then both
00:59:46.600 possibilities exist
00:59:47.800 forever.
00:59:48.160 But if you
00:59:49.420 got a
00:59:49.660 whistleblower who
00:59:50.660 had, you
00:59:51.160 know, photos
00:59:51.960 and videos
00:59:52.680 and documents
00:59:53.720 and recorded
00:59:55.020 phone calls,
00:59:56.100 then suddenly
00:59:57.040 the reality
00:59:57.740 would collapse,
00:59:59.100 and then it
00:59:59.520 would become a
01:00:00.100 rigged election.
01:00:01.280 But until
01:00:01.940 that, it is
01:00:03.500 neither rigged
01:00:04.280 nor non-rigged,
01:00:05.700 because you
01:00:06.140 don't know.
01:00:07.220 It is a
01:00:07.780 Schrodinger's
01:00:08.440 cat situation.
01:00:09.620 And I
01:00:09.960 genuinely see
01:00:10.780 it that way,
01:00:11.280 by the way.
01:00:12.020 That's my
01:00:12.500 actual impression
01:00:13.460 of reality,
01:00:14.520 is that that
01:00:15.100 reality has not
01:00:15.900 collapsed.
01:00:16.360 So it's not
01:00:17.620 a case of
01:00:18.160 whether we
01:00:18.540 can find it
01:00:19.360 or not,
01:00:20.640 because it's
01:00:21.620 not there.
01:00:23.200 It's a question
01:00:24.000 of whether we
01:00:24.460 can create it.
01:00:26.140 Can we
01:00:26.620 create a past?
01:00:28.460 Well, actually,
01:00:29.100 this will be a
01:00:29.520 good test to
01:00:30.080 find out if
01:00:30.580 Carrie Lake
01:00:31.060 is a player
01:00:31.720 or an NPC.
01:00:33.400 If Carrie
01:00:34.120 Lake is an
01:00:34.700 NPC, then she
01:00:37.720 will not be
01:00:38.160 able to create
01:00:38.720 the past,
01:00:39.480 and the
01:00:40.000 election will
01:00:40.540 stand.
01:00:41.560 If she's a 0.99
01:00:42.460 player, and
01:00:43.700 she might be,
01:00:45.020 I would
01:00:45.360 definitely not
01:00:45.860 rule that
01:00:46.280 out, if
01:00:47.220 she's a
01:00:47.600 player, she
01:00:49.180 will create,
01:00:51.380 through her
01:00:51.740 own imagination,
01:00:53.440 a reality,
01:00:54.500 which will
01:00:54.940 become all
01:00:55.460 of our
01:00:55.700 actual reality,
01:00:57.340 that it
01:00:57.680 was rigged,
01:00:58.540 and it
01:00:58.860 will be
01:00:59.160 found in
01:01:00.180 ways that
01:01:00.620 you didn't
01:01:00.920 expect.
01:01:02.580 So that's
01:01:03.220 my theory.
01:01:04.100 It is neither
01:01:04.680 rigged nor
01:01:05.340 not rigged.
01:01:06.900 It's a
01:01:08.000 black box.
01:01:08.900 It's, yeah,
01:01:09.480 it's a
01:01:09.860 Schrodinger's
01:01:10.420 cat.
01:01:11.540 And if we
01:01:13.500 never open the
01:01:14.340 box, it
01:01:15.800 will never,
01:01:16.860 the reality
01:01:17.540 will never
01:01:18.160 form into
01:01:19.560 one actual
01:01:20.500 reality.
01:01:21.580 It will
01:01:21.840 always have
01:01:22.200 the potential,
01:01:23.600 but there
01:01:24.180 will never be
01:01:24.700 an actual
01:01:25.280 reality of
01:01:26.360 whether it
01:01:26.700 was rigged
01:01:27.080 or not.
01:01:30.640 Is 0.88
01:01:31.080 CWCville
01:01:32.300 real?
01:01:32.800 I don't
01:01:33.020 know what
01:01:33.260 that is.
01:01:33.640 all right.
01:01:39.180 Is Trump
01:01:39.620 a player?
01:01:40.260 Clearly.
01:01:41.400 Yeah.
01:01:42.080 There's one
01:01:42.640 thing you
01:01:42.940 can say for
01:01:43.360 sure, is
01:01:44.600 that if we're
01:01:45.120 simulation, Trump
01:01:46.080 is a player,
01:01:46.800 because he can
01:01:48.040 change the
01:01:48.560 simulation.
01:01:49.960 He changes
01:01:50.700 what you
01:01:51.360 believe is
01:01:51.920 true.
01:01:53.160 That's as
01:01:54.280 player as
01:01:54.860 you get.
01:01:56.120 I mean, I
01:01:56.700 do the same
01:01:57.180 thing.
01:01:57.860 When I change
01:01:58.660 minds, it's a
01:02:00.640 rare thing.
01:02:01.740 So if somebody
01:02:02.140 can change your
01:02:02.800 mind, they're
01:02:03.220 probably a
01:02:03.620 player.
01:02:09.760 All right.
01:02:13.320 If we
01:02:13.920 create our
01:02:14.380 personal God
01:02:15.000 before we
01:02:15.540 die, do we
01:02:16.060 get one? 0.95
01:02:17.280 Well, it
01:02:17.940 depends what
01:02:19.300 dying means in
01:02:20.240 the simulation.
01:02:21.840 So you
01:02:22.600 don't get a
01:02:23.040 personal God
01:02:23.720 if your
01:02:24.700 program just
01:02:25.540 gets turned
01:02:26.000 off.
01:02:28.740 But maybe
01:02:29.440 the program
01:02:29.980 gives you an
01:02:30.820 afterlife.
01:02:32.080 What if the
01:02:32.680 program provides
01:02:33.520 an afterlife?
01:02:35.240 It might.
01:02:36.220 There might be
01:02:36.800 an afterlife.
01:02:40.560 All right.
01:02:43.460 Everyone is
01:02:44.240 influential in
01:02:44.920 some form or
01:02:45.640 another.
01:02:46.340 Yes, but not
01:02:47.040 at the same
01:02:47.680 degree.
01:02:49.140 All right.
01:02:49.200 I can change
01:03:02.260 your mind, you
01:03:02.880 say?
01:03:03.820 Maybe you
01:03:04.380 can.
01:03:07.140 Yeah, Russia 0.84
01:03:07.900 issued a
01:03:09.140 arrest warrant
01:03:09.760 for Senator
01:03:10.820 Lindsey Graham.
01:03:12.760 They just made
01:03:13.600 a big old list
01:03:14.280 of people who
01:03:14.780 were their
01:03:15.020 enemies.
01:03:15.680 It looked
01:03:15.940 like it was
01:03:16.340 randomly
01:03:16.760 created.
01:03:22.080 All right.
01:03:27.580 Why does
01:03:28.120 a disease
01:03:28.700 kill in the
01:03:29.260 simulation?
01:03:29.980 So it
01:03:30.280 looks real.
01:03:31.960 All right.
01:03:32.420 That's all for
01:03:32.860 now on YouTube.
01:03:33.520 I'm going to
01:03:33.780 talk to the
01:03:34.140 locals people a
01:03:34.800 little bit
01:03:35.080 more.
01:03:36.220 I will see
01:03:37.380 you later.
01:03:39.220 Bye.
01:03:42.560 Bye.
01:03:45.220 Bye.
01:03:45.920 Bye.
01:03:46.080 Bye.
01:03:46.280 Bye.
01:03:46.620 Bye.
01:03:47.940 Bye.
01:03:48.680 Bye.
01:03:50.860 Bye.
01:03:51.200 Bye.
01:03:54.600 Bye.
01:03:55.440 Bye.
01:04:04.700 Bye.
01:04:04.880 Bye.
01:04:07.380 Bye.