Real Coffee with Scott Adams - June 01, 2023


Episode 2126 Scott Adams: Walls Closing In On Trump, Biden & Wray, And Possibly Me, AI Girlfriend


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 5 minutes

Words per minute

139.17064

Word count

9,161

Sentence count

655

Harmful content

Misogyny

24

sentences flagged

Toxicity

92

sentences flagged

Hate speech

37

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Coffee with Scott Adams and a special guest, Joe Biden. Plus, a new release of Hunter Biden's laptop pictures, and a new Canada law that makes warnings on cigarettes more prominent on packages. And more.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Do-do-do-do-do-do.
00:00:03.020 Good morning, everybody.
00:00:04.820 Welcome to the highlight of civilization.
00:00:07.460 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams.
00:00:08.920 There's never been a finer time in your life.
00:00:12.140 It's only going to get better from here.
00:00:14.160 But if you'd like to get a little bump of dopamine,
00:00:17.440 possibly a little oxytocin,
00:00:20.480 then all you need is a cup or mug or glass,
00:00:23.600 a tank or chalice or stein,
00:00:24.840 a canteen choker, flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:27.760 Fill it with your favorite liquid I like.
00:00:30.360 Coffee.
00:00:31.280 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure,
00:00:34.620 the dopamine of the day.
00:00:37.200 I was just saying I knew I was forgetting something,
00:00:39.920 and it was my microphone.
00:00:42.380 Sure enough, here we go.
00:00:46.240 I knew something was wrong,
00:00:48.060 and now we're all good, aren't we?
00:00:50.440 Aren't we?
00:00:52.100 Everybody's happy now?
00:00:53.740 All right.
00:00:54.640 How would you like to do the simultaneous sip?
00:00:56.640 It happens now.
00:00:58.880 Go.
00:01:00.000 Ah, delightful.
00:01:08.200 I saw a conversation on Instagram yesterday,
00:01:12.840 and a little real, which means,
00:01:14.740 I don't know if there's any real science behind it,
00:01:16.540 but the claim was this.
00:01:18.600 Have you ever heard this?
00:01:20.260 That the free market and the business world
00:01:23.760 is designed for dopamine feedback,
00:01:27.780 meaning that if you do something well in the free market,
00:01:32.040 you get a raise or some kind of victory,
00:01:34.340 you get a little dopamine hit.
00:01:36.120 That's good.
00:01:36.660 People like dopamine.
00:01:37.980 However, the claim was that men operate on dopamine rewards,
00:01:44.940 and women work on oxytocin rewards, 1.00
00:01:49.220 and they're different,
00:01:50.400 which means that if you insert a woman who uses oxytocin as her operating system 1.00
00:01:57.140 into a financial system that's dopamine-based,
00:02:01.620 it might not be a perfect fit.
00:02:02.880 Is that interesting?
00:02:05.200 Now, of course, everybody uses both.
00:02:07.400 I mean, we all like dopamine,
00:02:08.840 and we all like oxytocin.
00:02:10.740 But oxytocin is the drug that makes you feel bonded
00:02:14.000 and secure and in love, basically.
00:02:18.260 And dopamine is just the one that you just had a good time.
00:02:21.060 So men are operating on having a good time,
00:02:25.000 and women are operating on trying to get that bonding feeling going, 1.00
00:02:28.380 and you can see why we would be confused about each other.
00:02:32.700 We are literally not the same operating system.
00:02:36.500 Some say,
00:02:37.720 well, I saw that there's going to be a new release
00:02:40.320 of Hunter's laptop pictures,
00:02:42.840 and you know what we can't get enough of?
00:02:46.160 I don't know about you,
00:02:47.420 but just today I was thinking,
00:02:48.660 there's only one thing that could really make my life better. 0.99
00:02:52.880 I would like to see Hunter Biden's penis from every angle. 1.00
00:02:58.600 Am I alone? 1.00
00:02:59.600 I don't think I'm alone in that.
00:03:02.360 Yeah, we need to see it from every angle.
00:03:04.360 We need to see close-ups.
00:03:06.380 Yeah, we need to see the whole thing.
00:03:08.580 If you leave out one angle,
00:03:10.060 I'm not even going to know what I'm looking at.
00:03:12.620 So good news for everybody.
00:03:14.080 We'll see lots more dirty Hunter pictures.
00:03:16.240 Meanwhile, in Canada,
00:03:20.460 Canada has decided that it's not good enough
00:03:22.780 to put the warnings on cigarette packages.
00:03:26.060 They're going to start putting the warnings
00:03:27.840 on the cigarettes themselves.
00:03:30.680 So there'll be a little message along the length of the cigarette.
00:03:34.520 So some of the things they're going to say are,
00:03:36.260 like, cigarettes cause cancer, of course.
00:03:38.280 But here's my favorite one.
00:03:40.100 Cigarettes cause impotence.
00:03:41.520 Do you remember when people used to smoke cigarettes
00:03:46.460 because it made them look cool?
00:03:49.840 Well, I can't think of anything less cool
00:03:51.860 than smoking something that says
00:03:53.940 it might cause impotence right on the cigarette.
00:04:01.220 That takes persuasion to the point of cruelty.
00:04:04.800 It's like, wow, that's persuasive.
00:04:08.000 But I think they can take it to another level.
00:04:10.260 What do you think?
00:04:11.580 I think that it's not enough just to print
00:04:14.320 right on the cigarette in Canada,
00:04:16.440 cigarettes cause impotence.
00:04:18.740 I think there should be a law
00:04:21.200 that the cigarette can't be just a tube.
00:04:24.080 You know, right now it's just like a long tube. 0.94
00:04:26.740 It needs a couple of balls on the end. 1.00
00:04:29.480 So there should be, like, some requirement 0.99
00:04:31.280 that your cigarette has balls. 0.99
00:04:32.800 So when you put it in your mouth, 1.00
00:04:36.840 it might look cool for some segment of society.
00:04:40.180 But for others, maybe it would be one more reason to quit.
00:04:43.360 Who knows?
00:04:44.200 Who knows?
00:04:45.700 Just a thought.
00:04:47.720 So Tara Reid, the woman who famously accused Joe Biden
00:04:51.960 of some sexual stuff that was never proven,
00:04:55.660 she moved to become a citizen of Russia.
00:05:02.640 Now, let me give you a little whistleblower tip.
00:05:07.820 All right?
00:05:08.140 If you make a claim about somebody in our government
00:05:12.840 and then you end up moving to Russia,
00:05:16.280 that does not help your claim.
00:05:19.120 It kind of makes you look like
00:05:20.680 maybe it was Russian all along. 0.61
00:05:24.100 Now, I'm not saying it was.
00:05:26.000 I'm just saying it's a bad look
00:05:28.100 when your mysterious accuser
00:05:32.420 suddenly moves to Russia
00:05:34.140 and is fully embraced.
00:05:35.480 Yeah.
00:05:37.760 Yeah, she's afraid for her life in the United States.
00:05:41.580 Okay.
00:05:42.600 I mean, she might be.
00:05:44.120 That could be true.
00:05:45.180 But it's a bad look.
00:05:46.800 Don't move to Russia is what I'm saying.
00:05:49.100 If you're claiming anything
00:05:50.820 that's controversial at all.
00:05:55.760 All right.
00:05:56.540 I told you yesterday, I guess,
00:05:59.080 that there was this new battery technology
00:06:01.680 using a material called vanadium.
00:06:05.480 And apparently, it would be a really big deal
00:06:08.060 if it could be developed further.
00:06:10.700 Now, I didn't know at the time
00:06:12.320 that it's already being refined.
00:06:14.760 So this vanadium stuff is not so much hypothetical.
00:06:18.760 But there are three places where it's being refined,
00:06:21.860 I learned today.
00:06:23.660 Russia, Brazil, and Arkansas.
00:06:27.640 Those are the three places that are big with vanadium.
00:06:30.120 Vanadium is a new material for making batteries
00:06:33.680 that could be way better than the current technology,
00:06:37.300 or at least as good.
00:06:39.100 And that would be a big breakthrough in cost
00:06:41.780 and reliability and all that.
00:06:44.280 Yeah.
00:06:44.520 So apparently, the best refiners of vanadium
00:06:49.100 is in Arkansas.
00:06:51.800 So it could be that Arkansas will become
00:06:56.600 a big battery-making center of the world.
00:07:02.900 Maybe.
00:07:03.700 Because we don't want to depend on Russia or Brazil 0.95
00:07:06.440 for our supply.
00:07:07.600 We've certainly learned that.
00:07:10.440 Well, let's put this next story
00:07:13.320 in the category of the most predictable story
00:07:17.740 of all stories.
00:07:20.700 Is anything more predictable
00:07:26.880 than the fact that in the news today,
00:07:29.520 there's a tech developer
00:07:30.720 who's going to clone his girlfriend with chat GPT,
00:07:34.360 and he's making an AI version of her.
00:07:37.540 And apparently, she can even take AI versions 0.86
00:07:40.320 of selfies and send to him.
00:07:43.320 So, was that the most predictable story
00:07:48.300 in all of technology?
00:07:50.600 There was no way that wasn't going to happen.
00:07:53.300 So now we have AI that can make an avatar of a person.
00:07:57.560 So obviously, you can make an avatar
00:07:58.900 of your chosen mate.
00:08:02.200 Then you could give that person a voice
00:08:04.360 that mimics the voice of the real person.
00:08:07.760 So obviously, you're going to make an avatar
00:08:09.780 of anybody you want,
00:08:11.160 and they will talk just like that person.
00:08:13.320 And they'll be able to have a conversation.
00:08:15.440 But you can also give it a personality.
00:08:18.040 Because you could give it a body of writing,
00:08:20.520 for example,
00:08:21.620 and say, this is your personality.
00:08:23.420 You know, conform to this.
00:08:25.440 And it'll just be that.
00:08:28.060 So, here's my question.
00:08:30.440 Do you think he programmed it
00:08:32.740 to have all of the, let's say,
00:08:35.340 the less positive characteristics of his girlfriend?
00:08:38.780 Or did he just put in the good ones?
00:08:42.100 For example,
00:08:43.700 will his AI complain about him
00:08:45.940 not doing enough?
00:08:48.960 Do you think the AI will complain?
00:08:50.720 Will the AI start a fight with him
00:08:53.380 just to get attention?
00:08:56.260 Just to test him?
00:08:58.040 Will the AI do that?
00:08:59.940 Will the AI be really angry at him
00:09:02.920 for no reason whatsoever?
00:09:04.100 Well, I don't know.
00:09:08.360 And so, here's the funny part.
00:09:11.400 This guy is creating a competitor
00:09:13.420 for his girlfriend
00:09:14.540 that is a copy of his girlfriend 0.99
00:09:18.620 minus all the fucked up parts. 0.99
00:09:21.160 How is she going to compete with that? 0.99
00:09:27.660 You know,
00:09:28.500 anybody who's ever been in a relationship
00:09:30.600 knows that it's no more than half good.
00:09:34.580 Right?
00:09:35.040 Like, after a while.
00:09:36.420 After a while,
00:09:37.020 it's no more than 50% good.
00:09:39.080 And then it's 50%, you know,
00:09:40.640 terror and awfulness.
00:09:42.660 What if he takes the 50% awful part 0.63
00:09:45.400 out of the clone?
00:09:47.520 How is the real one
00:09:48.320 going to compete with that?
00:09:49.300 I mean that literally.
00:09:52.460 How could a real woman 1.00
00:09:53.520 compete with that?
00:09:57.000 Now, when I say it,
00:09:58.060 I'm sure that everybody laughs, right?
00:10:00.940 When I say,
00:10:01.920 how can a real woman compete 1.00
00:10:03.340 with her own clone
00:10:04.320 that removes her bad parts? 1.00
00:10:07.340 You kind of think
00:10:08.240 that's just funny, right?
00:10:10.040 Oh, that's just like
00:10:10.880 an amusing, comedic,
00:10:13.300 you know, observation.
00:10:16.580 It's not.
00:10:17.260 It is not a comedic observation.
00:10:20.900 It might be the biggest problem
00:10:22.500 in the world.
00:10:24.640 Because it's going to make
00:10:25.780 reproduction look like a bad deal.
00:10:29.620 It really is.
00:10:31.080 It really, genuinely,
00:10:32.860 is going to make reproduction
00:10:34.100 kind of a challenge.
00:10:35.800 And relationships
00:10:37.020 and everything else.
00:10:37.900 I once had an idea
00:10:42.020 of producing
00:10:43.160 what I would call
00:10:44.760 G-rated pornography 0.52
00:10:48.160 for men.
00:10:50.900 G-rated pornography
00:10:52.720 for men.
00:10:54.480 And it would feature
00:10:55.340 a man coming home
00:10:56.640 from a hard day of work
00:10:57.760 and his wife
00:10:59.680 being really nice to him.
00:11:01.920 That would be the whole show.
00:11:03.220 That's it.
00:11:08.220 She just really cares
00:11:09.440 about him
00:11:09.940 and asks him
00:11:11.400 how she can make him happy
00:11:12.520 and maybe brings him
00:11:14.720 his favorite beverage.
00:11:16.320 Gives a little back rub.
00:11:18.380 Says she really appreciates
00:11:20.000 all he does for her.
00:11:21.420 And that's it.
00:11:22.160 That's the little show.
00:11:24.280 No plot.
00:11:25.740 So the reason I call it porn
00:11:27.800 is that you wouldn't be
00:11:29.520 watching it for the story.
00:11:30.880 You know, you don't really care
00:11:33.020 about their whole life.
00:11:33.860 You're just like,
00:11:34.480 ooh, I'd like to see
00:11:35.480 what would that look like
00:11:37.000 to have a man
00:11:38.600 who's just like treated
00:11:39.540 as a, you know,
00:11:41.280 as a valued part
00:11:42.320 of the household and stuff.
00:11:43.980 That'd be cool.
00:11:45.460 Yeah, sort of 50s style.
00:11:46.680 Exactly.
00:11:47.820 Now, I believe in modern lingo
00:11:50.480 that would be called
00:11:51.620 a trad wife.
00:11:53.300 Have you heard that term?
00:11:54.900 T-R-A-D. 1.00
00:11:56.340 Short for traditional
00:11:57.760 as in 50s kind of,
00:12:00.500 you know,
00:12:00.980 man is the head
00:12:01.560 of the household,
00:12:02.940 woman does the cooking 0.99
00:12:04.200 sort of thing.
00:12:07.860 Trad is everything
00:12:08.780 is what I'm going for.
00:12:10.840 Well, there you go.
00:12:13.840 Well, so maybe
00:12:14.900 that'll happen someday.
00:12:17.780 I saw a story
00:12:19.100 that at the close
00:12:20.260 of the market yesterday,
00:12:22.300 someone unknown
00:12:23.260 sold 33 million shares
00:12:25.160 of Apple at the close.
00:12:27.240 and that's
00:12:28.580 $5.8 billion worth.
00:12:32.400 $5.8 billion.
00:12:35.020 Now, here's what
00:12:36.660 here's what I wondered.
00:12:39.000 I wondered if
00:12:40.120 whoever did that selling
00:12:41.220 had the same experience
00:12:42.220 I did.
00:12:43.740 Because the reason
00:12:44.840 I sold my Apple stock,
00:12:46.480 so I don't own any,
00:12:47.540 and by the way,
00:12:48.060 I'm not recommending this.
00:12:49.620 I'm not recommending it.
00:12:51.580 I'm just describing, right?
00:12:53.340 Do not do what I do
00:12:54.580 financially.
00:12:55.180 It is not a good idea.
00:12:57.440 Trust me,
00:12:57.840 it's not a good idea.
00:12:59.640 But the reason
00:13:00.840 that I got rid
00:13:01.540 of my Apple stock
00:13:02.440 is that I'd spend
00:13:03.960 a week or two
00:13:04.920 playing with AI,
00:13:06.720 and then I tried
00:13:08.040 to use my
00:13:08.860 Apple S-I-R-I,
00:13:11.860 I don't want to trigger them,
00:13:13.580 to do anything.
00:13:15.480 And as soon as you use
00:13:16.640 the Apple version
00:13:17.520 of that little thing
00:13:19.080 you talk to,
00:13:20.200 and you compare that
00:13:21.480 to any AI,
00:13:22.500 it looks like
00:13:24.700 they just gave up.
00:13:26.400 I can't imagine
00:13:27.460 a world in which
00:13:28.380 Steve Jobs
00:13:29.620 is behind
00:13:30.480 on this technology.
00:13:33.600 Can you imagine
00:13:34.140 Apple being behind
00:13:35.520 on this?
00:13:37.580 Like, way behind.
00:13:38.860 Way, way behind.
00:13:39.720 I mean, because
00:13:40.160 Siri doesn't even look 0.92
00:13:41.940 like a real product
00:13:43.360 in 2023.
00:13:45.300 It looks like a joke.
00:13:48.280 Well, we'll see.
00:13:49.820 We'll see if Apple
00:13:51.220 can pull it out.
00:13:52.300 If you had to bet,
00:13:53.580 don't bet my way,
00:13:55.400 I think the safer bet
00:13:57.100 is that Apple
00:13:58.340 will do something
00:13:59.200 really big with AI.
00:14:01.440 They'll just wait
00:14:02.200 and try to get it right.
00:14:04.060 But at the moment,
00:14:05.940 they really look like
00:14:07.100 they're not
00:14:07.560 a current technology.
00:14:09.920 And my biggest fear
00:14:11.320 is that the entire
00:14:12.960 app store concept
00:14:15.400 of the iPhone,
00:14:16.820 the entire ecosystem,
00:14:18.300 doesn't make sense
00:14:19.240 if you could just
00:14:20.460 have an operating
00:14:21.080 system that's AI
00:14:22.080 and it does
00:14:23.700 all of those things.
00:14:25.540 So if you need
00:14:26.400 a date,
00:14:27.380 your AI figures
00:14:28.380 out how to do it.
00:14:30.080 You don't need
00:14:30.800 a dating app.
00:14:31.880 If you need
00:14:32.420 to do some math,
00:14:33.320 you don't need
00:14:33.680 a spreadsheet.
00:14:35.120 Just tell the AI
00:14:36.860 what you want
00:14:37.420 and it'll produce
00:14:37.980 it for you.
00:14:39.680 So I think
00:14:40.600 we're approaching
00:14:41.860 the point where
00:14:42.780 the only interface
00:14:44.520 is you talking
00:14:45.460 to an intelligent
00:14:46.620 entity.
00:14:50.320 Your AI wife
00:14:52.020 will sing
00:14:52.480 the theme song
00:14:53.440 for Miami Vice.
00:14:55.800 That's very specific.
00:14:58.020 Good comment there.
00:15:02.120 All right.
00:15:03.620 Mike M. says,
00:15:04.920 trad wives 0.92
00:15:05.640 all day long.
00:15:07.120 Men,
00:15:07.620 how many of you
00:15:08.400 wish you had
00:15:09.120 a trad wife?
00:15:10.620 Or maybe you do.
00:15:11.680 If you have one,
00:15:12.420 you can just say
00:15:12.920 you want one.
00:15:13.440 with all the yeses.
00:15:18.940 It's like a wall
00:15:20.040 of yes.
00:15:23.100 You had one,
00:15:24.220 got one,
00:15:24.900 yes.
00:15:26.240 And you're happier
00:15:27.200 because of it,
00:15:27.880 right?
00:15:28.660 Are you happier
00:15:29.340 because you have
00:15:29.880 a trad wife?
00:15:33.760 Is there anybody
00:15:34.640 who wishes
00:15:35.280 that they had
00:15:36.460 more of a
00:15:37.200 feminist,
00:15:38.700 independent
00:15:39.180 partner?
00:15:40.460 No.
00:15:43.440 PJ says,
00:15:47.420 why are men
00:15:48.000 scared of real
00:15:48.820 women? 1.00
00:15:49.780 Is that what's
00:15:50.480 going on?
00:15:52.020 Is that what
00:15:52.580 you saw?
00:15:53.160 Did you see
00:15:53.840 men were afraid
00:15:55.180 of real women? 0.80
00:15:56.580 That's what
00:15:57.140 you're picking up
00:15:57.740 from this
00:15:58.080 conversation?
00:16:01.040 I don't think
00:16:01.780 that's exactly
00:16:02.420 what's going on.
00:16:03.740 Not exactly.
00:16:07.600 Well,
00:16:08.080 maybe it's just
00:16:08.680 going to be
00:16:09.040 some reversion
00:16:10.740 to the meme
00:16:11.340 going on.
00:16:11.940 You know,
00:16:14.140 what's interesting
00:16:14.720 is,
00:16:16.180 here's a
00:16:17.260 hypothesis
00:16:18.100 that's brand
00:16:19.100 new,
00:16:19.360 I'm just
00:16:19.640 making it up
00:16:20.260 on the fly.
00:16:21.840 Would you
00:16:22.260 say that
00:16:22.800 men,
00:16:23.860 as a strategy,
00:16:25.500 try to figure
00:16:26.200 out what it
00:16:26.740 is that women 1.00
00:16:27.280 want,
00:16:28.560 and then they
00:16:29.060 try pretty hard
00:16:29.760 to give it to
00:16:30.280 them?
00:16:31.060 Would you
00:16:31.540 say that's
00:16:31.900 true?
00:16:33.280 Men try to 1.00
00:16:34.000 figure out what
00:16:34.540 women want, 1.00
00:16:35.180 and they try
00:16:35.500 to give it to
00:16:35.900 them.
00:16:36.040 Now,
00:16:36.320 where it all
00:16:37.100 goes off the
00:16:37.680 rails is that
00:16:39.360 women lie about 1.00
00:16:40.240 what they want. 0.93
00:16:41.940 So you can
00:16:43.000 never get it
00:16:43.480 right.
00:16:44.100 Or they
00:16:44.620 can't be
00:16:45.040 pleased.
00:16:45.720 Some would
00:16:46.100 say there's
00:16:46.520 nothing that
00:16:46.940 makes them
00:16:47.240 happy.
00:16:48.280 So it's
00:16:48.940 basically,
00:16:49.620 you end up
00:16:50.860 being like a 0.68
00:16:51.460 gerbil on a
00:16:52.400 treadmill.
00:16:53.880 I can make
00:16:54.540 you happy
00:16:54.900 today.
00:16:55.780 If only I'll
00:16:56.420 do a little
00:16:56.780 bit more.
00:16:57.580 All right,
00:16:57.840 that wasn't
00:16:58.280 enough.
00:16:59.120 But I think
00:16:59.640 I can make
00:17:00.080 you happy
00:17:00.420 today.
00:17:01.700 Yesterday was 0.99
00:17:02.400 a loser. 0.99
00:17:03.300 I did 0.99
00:17:03.560 everything I
00:17:04.060 could,
00:17:04.320 but it
00:17:04.520 didn't work
00:17:04.860 out.
00:17:05.460 But today,
00:17:06.360 I'm just
00:17:06.900 going to work
00:17:07.320 through your
00:17:07.680 list of things
00:17:08.220 you want me
00:17:08.620 to do.
00:17:09.260 I'm going to
00:17:09.640 put that shirt
00:17:10.280 on you want
00:17:11.940 what you
00:17:12.180 want me
00:17:12.500 to do.
00:17:13.860 It won't
00:17:14.400 work out.
00:17:15.360 It won't
00:17:15.680 work out.
00:17:18.280 But do
00:17:18.960 women do 1.00
00:17:19.380 the same
00:17:19.700 thing?
00:17:21.300 Aside from
00:17:22.180 looking good,
00:17:24.140 which of
00:17:24.660 course women
00:17:25.060 do put
00:17:25.720 effort into
00:17:26.220 looking good
00:17:26.900 for men,
00:17:27.660 do they
00:17:28.140 also put
00:17:28.900 effort into
00:17:29.500 doing whatever
00:17:30.600 would make
00:17:31.100 men happy
00:17:31.760 as best they
00:17:32.960 understand it?
00:17:34.680 Is that a
00:17:35.440 thing?
00:17:37.060 We see some
00:17:37.900 yeses.
00:17:38.760 We see some
00:17:39.320 yeses.
00:17:40.080 But I think
00:17:40.500 that's the
00:17:40.920 trad wife
00:17:41.480 talking.
00:17:41.940 Maybe the
00:17:43.920 trad wives 0.92
00:17:44.480 do.
00:17:45.540 Maybe that's
00:17:46.080 the difference.
00:17:50.160 All right. 0.91
00:17:52.140 Narcissistic
00:17:52.660 abuse to
00:17:53.360 put a man 0.93
00:17:53.860 on a
00:17:54.140 treadmill and
00:17:55.380 never give
00:17:56.220 him any
00:17:56.640 positive
00:17:57.180 reinforcement?
00:17:58.220 It does
00:17:58.780 seem like
00:17:59.160 narcissistic
00:17:59.880 abuse.
00:18:01.320 You try
00:18:01.800 very hard
00:18:02.240 to please
00:18:02.760 your husband.
00:18:05.760 Well,
00:18:07.720 let me
00:18:08.540 speak for a
00:18:09.460 moment to
00:18:11.000 the viewer
00:18:11.500 who said,
00:18:12.040 I try
00:18:12.260 very hard
00:18:12.680 to please
00:18:13.140 my husband.
00:18:15.040 I would
00:18:15.920 like to
00:18:16.460 put a
00:18:17.840 little color
00:18:18.580 on that
00:18:19.040 comment.
00:18:20.520 You try
00:18:21.200 very hard
00:18:21.620 to please
00:18:22.060 your husband.
00:18:24.420 So let's
00:18:25.440 see, what
00:18:25.860 would be
00:18:26.400 included in
00:18:27.080 that?
00:18:27.480 Would,
00:18:28.380 let's say,
00:18:29.840 doing shopping
00:18:30.620 for his
00:18:31.140 clothes,
00:18:32.080 maybe buying
00:18:32.620 him a new
00:18:32.980 shirt that
00:18:34.380 he didn't
00:18:34.660 ask for,
00:18:35.600 would that be
00:18:36.360 part of
00:18:36.660 it?
00:18:37.800 Buying
00:18:38.240 things for
00:18:38.760 him?
00:18:40.420 With his
00:18:41.060 money?
00:18:41.920 Or with
00:18:42.580 your shared
00:18:42.980 money, I
00:18:43.380 guess.
00:18:45.540 Yeah.
00:18:48.940 Yeah, but
00:18:49.560 the problem
00:18:50.000 is, I don't
00:18:50.660 know if
00:18:50.980 women understand 0.66
00:18:52.480 what men
00:18:53.420 need.
00:18:54.560 We just
00:18:55.220 need a
00:18:55.560 sandwich and 1.00
00:18:56.020 a blowjob. 1.00
00:18:57.700 Am I 1.00
00:18:58.280 right, men?
00:19:00.720 Because a
00:19:01.400 sandwich and a 1.00
00:19:02.000 blowjob are 0.99
00:19:02.700 both appreciation. 0.99
00:19:03.640 They're
00:19:05.220 basically
00:19:05.740 physical
00:19:06.420 manifestations
00:19:07.140 of appreciation.
00:19:08.480 And we
00:19:08.900 work for
00:19:09.340 appreciation.
00:19:10.720 We're just
00:19:11.140 appreciation
00:19:11.740 animals.
00:19:12.960 Oh, okay,
00:19:14.000 as long as
00:19:14.420 you appreciate
00:19:14.860 it, I'll
00:19:15.240 do that.
00:19:16.260 Would you 0.99
00:19:16.700 bang your 0.97
00:19:17.200 head against 1.00
00:19:17.600 this wall?
00:19:18.860 Would you
00:19:19.280 appreciate it?
00:19:20.300 Yes, I
00:19:20.740 would.
00:19:21.480 Okay, I'll 0.97
00:19:22.480 bang my 0.98
00:19:22.820 head against 0.99
00:19:23.160 the wall.
00:19:24.000 I just need
00:19:24.580 that appreciation.
00:19:25.480 That's all
00:19:25.780 I'm working
00:19:26.080 for.
00:19:27.820 So sandwich
00:19:28.800 and a 1.00
00:19:29.100 blowjob is 0.99
00:19:29.720 really just 0.99
00:19:30.200 the physical
00:19:30.740 version of
00:19:31.380 the appreciation.
00:19:33.640 All right,
00:19:34.180 well, if
00:19:34.420 you understand
00:19:34.880 what men
00:19:35.260 want, then 0.76
00:19:35.840 trying to
00:19:36.300 please them
00:19:36.900 seems like
00:19:37.540 it'd be
00:19:37.780 crazy.
00:19:40.200 More examples 0.70
00:19:41.100 of poorly
00:19:41.760 run California,
00:19:43.060 my state that
00:19:43.760 is total 1.00
00:19:44.800 garbage. 1.00
00:19:46.260 So some 0.99
00:19:47.060 insurers are
00:19:47.780 pulling out of
00:19:48.300 the state,
00:19:49.280 and I didn't
00:19:50.380 know the
00:19:50.700 details of
00:19:51.340 why.
00:19:52.420 This is
00:19:53.060 going to
00:19:53.280 make your 0.97
00:19:53.620 head explode. 0.69
00:19:55.560 This is
00:19:56.200 why State
00:19:56.800 Farm and
00:19:57.620 some others
00:19:58.180 don't want
00:19:59.160 to offer
00:19:59.840 insurance,
00:20:00.800 home insurance,
00:20:01.740 in California.
00:20:03.640 California is
00:20:04.700 the only
00:20:05.060 state, I
00:20:05.740 saw this in
00:20:06.200 the Wall
00:20:06.440 Street Journal,
00:20:07.400 California is
00:20:08.060 the only
00:20:08.380 state that
00:20:09.720 forces insurers
00:20:10.840 to base
00:20:12.100 their rates
00:20:12.800 on the
00:20:14.060 past.
00:20:16.800 It's the
00:20:17.480 only state.
00:20:19.000 And do you
00:20:19.420 know what's
00:20:19.660 wrong with
00:20:20.040 the past?
00:20:21.360 It does
00:20:22.120 not describe
00:20:22.820 the future.
00:20:25.120 Right.
00:20:25.660 So in
00:20:26.140 California,
00:20:27.060 our forests
00:20:27.860 are getting
00:20:28.260 drier and
00:20:29.180 less managed,
00:20:30.620 so things
00:20:31.600 are much
00:20:32.060 more dangerous
00:20:32.720 in terms of
00:20:33.320 fire than
00:20:34.360 they ever
00:20:34.720 have been
00:20:35.080 before.
00:20:36.220 Now,
00:20:36.660 insurance
00:20:37.040 companies are
00:20:37.660 fine with
00:20:38.040 that,
00:20:38.760 normally.
00:20:39.860 They just
00:20:40.280 say,
00:20:40.580 well,
00:20:40.760 you live
00:20:41.160 in a
00:20:41.680 combustible
00:20:42.580 state,
00:20:43.520 we'll charge
00:20:44.160 you a lot
00:20:44.620 for that,
00:20:45.680 and you'll
00:20:46.520 have insurance
00:20:47.080 and we'll
00:20:47.400 make money
00:20:47.900 and you'll
00:20:48.620 pay too
00:20:48.940 much for
00:20:49.340 it,
00:20:49.460 but that's
00:20:49.740 not our
00:20:50.100 fault.
00:20:51.320 And then
00:20:51.600 everybody
00:20:51.900 have insurance.
00:20:53.220 But in
00:20:53.580 California,
00:20:54.220 you have to
00:20:54.580 set the
00:20:54.960 rate based
00:20:55.540 on what
00:20:55.900 the forest
00:20:56.400 fire
00:20:56.680 situation
00:20:57.400 used to
00:20:59.040 be.
00:21:00.300 Just think
00:21:00.900 about that.
00:21:01.380 We've
00:21:02.720 clearly
00:21:03.060 entered a
00:21:03.860 period where
00:21:04.600 because of
00:21:06.500 climate or
00:21:07.140 forest management
00:21:08.080 or whatever
00:21:08.600 it is,
00:21:09.480 the risk of
00:21:10.340 a fire in
00:21:11.140 California is
00:21:11.800 way higher
00:21:12.600 next year
00:21:13.900 than the
00:21:15.760 average of
00:21:16.260 any year in
00:21:16.700 the past.
00:21:17.220 And the
00:21:17.420 insurance company
00:21:18.100 can't set the
00:21:18.700 rates based on
00:21:19.320 that.
00:21:22.800 How much
00:21:24.420 worse could
00:21:25.220 you run
00:21:25.680 a state?
00:21:26.920 It's the
00:21:27.420 only one.
00:21:27.960 all of the
00:21:28.960 other states
00:21:29.460 don't have
00:21:29.860 this problem
00:21:30.420 just because
00:21:31.440 they're not
00:21:31.840 incompetent.
00:21:32.820 They let the 0.67
00:21:33.520 free market
00:21:34.000 do what the
00:21:34.480 free market
00:21:34.900 wants to
00:21:35.380 do.
00:21:36.560 How hard
00:21:37.240 is that?
00:21:39.100 I mean,
00:21:39.760 all the
00:21:40.180 other states
00:21:40.700 got it
00:21:41.120 right.
00:21:42.100 All the
00:21:42.720 other states
00:21:43.380 in California
00:21:44.660 can't figure
00:21:45.200 it out.
00:21:45.960 So we don't
00:21:46.680 get insurance.
00:21:47.840 Our houses
00:21:48.220 just burn
00:21:48.680 up.
00:21:50.860 Insane.
00:21:51.820 Speaking of
00:21:52.380 California and
00:21:53.240 Oakland,
00:21:54.800 which you
00:21:55.320 might know
00:21:55.880 is one of
00:21:57.620 the more
00:21:57.880 dangerous
00:21:58.280 places to
00:21:58.960 go.
00:21:59.480 I certainly
00:21:59.940 would never
00:22:00.380 step foot in
00:22:01.280 Oakland.
00:22:02.480 I've been
00:22:03.040 invited to
00:22:03.620 Oakland a few
00:22:04.160 times in the
00:22:04.740 past few
00:22:06.120 years.
00:22:07.100 And I always
00:22:07.560 just laugh.
00:22:09.080 I go,
00:22:09.480 seriously?
00:22:11.060 You think
00:22:11.680 there's any
00:22:12.160 reason that
00:22:12.680 would get me
00:22:13.020 to Oakland?
00:22:14.780 There's nothing.
00:22:16.200 There isn't
00:22:16.700 anything.
00:22:17.020 You could give
00:22:17.360 me the Nobel 1.00
00:22:17.960 fucking prize in 0.99
00:22:19.000 Oakland, and 1.00
00:22:19.900 I'd say mail
00:22:20.520 it to me.
00:22:21.640 I'm not going
00:22:22.080 to step foot
00:22:22.800 in Oakland.
00:22:24.080 That's just
00:22:24.480 not going to
00:22:24.880 happen.
00:22:25.960 So there was
00:22:26.760 a video of
00:22:27.420 a meeting
00:22:27.780 in which
00:22:28.160 the citizens
00:22:28.860 were outraged
00:22:30.540 about all
00:22:31.040 the crime,
00:22:31.680 especially the
00:22:32.280 violent stuff
00:22:32.980 and the
00:22:33.320 physical stuff.
00:22:34.820 And there
00:22:35.260 was a big
00:22:35.620 crowd of
00:22:36.420 people who
00:22:36.980 had joined
00:22:37.880 to say
00:22:39.040 that the
00:22:39.760 lack of
00:22:40.200 policing had
00:22:40.760 gone too
00:22:41.140 far.
00:22:42.140 And the
00:22:42.900 woman who 0.99
00:22:43.320 was talking
00:22:43.800 asked a
00:22:44.580 show of
00:22:44.960 hands how
00:22:46.200 many of
00:22:46.560 them had
00:22:46.860 been assaulted,
00:22:48.760 just physically
00:22:49.440 assaulted.
00:22:51.580 And an
00:22:52.940 alarming number
00:22:53.640 of people
00:22:53.980 raised their
00:22:54.480 hands,
00:22:55.300 physically
00:22:55.820 assaulted.
00:22:56.760 I'm not
00:22:57.420 talking about
00:22:57.820 a property
00:22:58.340 crime.
00:22:59.460 Just their
00:22:59.900 body was
00:23:00.880 physically
00:23:01.420 assaulted
00:23:01.900 somewhere in
00:23:02.560 the street.
00:23:03.660 And it's
00:23:03.900 like everybody
00:23:04.420 was raising
00:23:04.800 their hand.
00:23:06.880 How often
00:23:07.700 do you get
00:23:08.080 assaulted just
00:23:08.760 walking down
00:23:09.320 the street in
00:23:09.960 Oakland?
00:23:10.800 Looks like
00:23:11.440 it's a daily
00:23:12.000 occurrence.
00:23:14.200 Anyway, so
00:23:15.120 that's another
00:23:16.100 poor California
00:23:17.200 management.
00:23:19.220 Another topic,
00:23:20.420 I'm going to
00:23:21.600 talk about this
00:23:22.180 because it rhymes.
00:23:23.780 Did you know
00:23:24.240 that America
00:23:24.720 has a
00:23:25.100 birth
00:23:25.340 dearth?
00:23:26.640 Yeah,
00:23:27.300 there's a
00:23:27.680 dearth of
00:23:28.000 births.
00:23:29.320 So the
00:23:29.780 birth
00:23:29.980 dearth,
00:23:30.660 which is
00:23:31.040 really the
00:23:31.380 only reason
00:23:31.720 I'm talking
00:23:32.100 about this
00:23:32.480 story, is
00:23:32.880 so I can
00:23:33.200 say birth
00:23:33.600 dearth.
00:23:34.920 Now you're
00:23:35.500 going to
00:23:35.680 say it at
00:23:36.040 home.
00:23:37.080 You have
00:23:37.440 to.
00:23:37.880 Say it.
00:23:39.260 Say it.
00:23:40.520 On your
00:23:41.040 own, everybody,
00:23:42.180 you have to
00:23:42.580 say it.
00:23:42.960 Birth
00:23:43.140 dearth.
00:23:43.940 It's just
00:23:44.320 too fun not
00:23:44.840 to say.
00:23:46.300 You can feel
00:23:47.060 it, right?
00:23:48.100 As soon as I
00:23:48.660 said it, you
00:23:49.140 said to
00:23:49.400 yourself, I
00:23:49.780 have to say
00:23:50.220 that.
00:23:51.440 Birth
00:23:51.640 dearth, and
00:23:52.920 then you
00:23:53.160 felt okay.
00:23:54.720 Well, so
00:23:57.280 here's what
00:23:59.380 makes me
00:23:59.820 think we
00:24:00.240 live in a
00:24:00.720 simulation.
00:24:02.820 How do
00:24:03.440 you explain
00:24:03.920 the fact
00:24:04.460 that the
00:24:05.720 human population
00:24:07.140 is stalling
00:24:08.240 and starting
00:24:08.720 to decrease
00:24:09.580 at exactly
00:24:11.340 the time
00:24:12.040 the AI
00:24:12.960 is going
00:24:13.400 to take
00:24:13.780 jobs?
00:24:16.240 Does that
00:24:16.880 feel like a
00:24:17.780 little bit
00:24:18.140 too on the
00:24:18.620 nose?
00:24:18.940 Like, how
00:24:21.400 could those
00:24:21.840 two things
00:24:22.340 happen at
00:24:22.760 the same
00:24:23.080 time?
00:24:24.800 That the
00:24:25.280 exact answer
00:24:26.600 to AI
00:24:28.520 taking all
00:24:29.160 our jobs
00:24:29.740 is fewer
00:24:30.280 people, right?
00:24:32.860 Now, what's
00:24:33.620 our other
00:24:33.980 biggest problem
00:24:34.760 when you say
00:24:36.540 inflation?
00:24:38.320 Inflation is
00:24:39.060 a terrible
00:24:39.400 problem.
00:24:40.260 Do you
00:24:40.460 know what
00:24:40.760 is the
00:24:41.040 best solution
00:24:41.600 to inflation?
00:24:43.420 An
00:24:43.980 improvement
00:24:44.380 in productivity
00:24:45.360 so that one
00:24:46.840 person can
00:24:47.420 make more
00:24:48.040 stuff,
00:24:48.940 then that
00:24:49.740 stuff will
00:24:50.360 be less
00:24:51.180 cost per
00:24:51.780 unit because
00:24:52.640 it's made
00:24:53.080 more cheaply,
00:24:54.300 and then people
00:24:55.040 pay less for
00:24:55.660 stuff, and
00:24:56.040 that's the
00:24:56.800 answer to
00:24:57.460 inflation.
00:24:59.300 So it's
00:25:00.020 kind of weird
00:25:00.640 that all
00:25:02.640 of our
00:25:03.000 problems,
00:25:03.960 the big
00:25:04.380 ones, I
00:25:05.060 would argue
00:25:05.720 that climate
00:25:06.360 is also
00:25:07.720 something that
00:25:08.300 will be
00:25:09.220 solved by
00:25:09.700 AI.
00:25:10.840 For example,
00:25:12.300 if you
00:25:12.660 wanted to
00:25:13.140 have a
00:25:13.700 proper fusion
00:25:14.740 reactor,
00:25:15.740 which would
00:25:16.220 certainly get
00:25:17.260 you closer to
00:25:17.960 solving all
00:25:18.560 the climate
00:25:18.940 issues, if
00:25:19.880 there are
00:25:20.140 any, you
00:25:22.740 need AI to
00:25:24.380 keep your
00:25:24.820 fusion reactor
00:25:25.900 optimized.
00:25:27.420 So there's
00:25:27.980 a whole bunch
00:25:28.340 of places
00:25:28.700 where AI will
00:25:29.620 probably figure
00:25:30.220 out better
00:25:30.920 battery technology
00:25:32.000 and a bunch
00:25:33.080 of stuff like
00:25:33.600 that.
00:25:34.800 So it's
00:25:35.980 kind of weird
00:25:36.460 that AI is
00:25:37.300 coming along
00:25:37.860 at exactly
00:25:38.540 the time when
00:25:40.180 it's sort of
00:25:40.660 the only thing
00:25:41.360 that would solve
00:25:41.900 our other
00:25:42.420 biggest problems.
00:25:43.280 isn't that
00:25:45.660 weird?
00:25:46.380 Everything
00:25:46.700 from climate
00:25:48.280 and energy
00:25:48.940 to too
00:25:51.060 many people
00:25:51.920 old, not
00:25:52.660 enough young
00:25:53.140 workers,
00:25:53.860 inflation,
00:25:55.980 even loneliness.
00:25:57.920 What about
00:25:58.220 loneliness?
00:25:59.740 What about
00:26:00.100 health care?
00:26:01.780 These are all
00:26:02.340 things that AI
00:26:03.000 is going to
00:26:03.440 be insanely
00:26:04.580 useful for
00:26:07.640 mitigating those
00:26:08.660 problems.
00:26:10.500 I don't know,
00:26:10.880 it's such a
00:26:11.660 weird coincidence
00:26:12.300 that you could
00:26:12.980 have 14
00:26:13.920 billion years
00:26:14.700 of this
00:26:16.180 universe,
00:26:17.760 and then
00:26:18.020 in this little
00:26:19.000 slice of time
00:26:19.940 that those
00:26:21.280 things all
00:26:21.760 happen at the
00:26:22.340 same time.
00:26:23.740 Now, it
00:26:24.220 could be it's
00:26:25.020 just a symptom
00:26:26.340 of an advanced
00:26:27.420 civilization.
00:26:28.900 So maybe it's
00:26:29.460 not a coincidence,
00:26:30.700 but I'm glad
00:26:31.580 it's happening.
00:26:34.460 All right.
00:26:37.560 Breitbart
00:26:38.160 was reporting
00:26:38.920 that,
00:26:40.100 according to
00:26:40.720 polls,
00:26:41.300 Trump beats
00:26:42.000 DeSantis on
00:26:43.080 essentially every
00:26:44.480 important policy
00:26:45.820 issue.
00:26:47.400 It's not even
00:26:48.380 close.
00:26:50.720 Now, this
00:26:51.840 unfortunately
00:26:52.520 plays very much
00:26:54.300 into the
00:26:55.180 DeSantis is the
00:26:56.740 tribute band.
00:26:57.740 Yeah, it's the
00:26:58.340 tribute band.
00:26:59.560 That's the
00:27:00.140 problem.
00:27:01.700 Most situations,
00:27:03.420 let's take a
00:27:04.300 more classic
00:27:05.500 example.
00:27:06.680 Let's take
00:27:07.400 Joe Biden
00:27:08.480 Biden versus
00:27:09.400 RFK Jr.
00:27:12.760 RFK Jr.
00:27:13.560 is not the
00:27:14.360 weak version
00:27:15.140 of Joe Biden
00:27:15.900 or vice
00:27:17.160 versa.
00:27:18.260 It's not like
00:27:19.060 one is just
00:27:19.720 a little better
00:27:20.520 than the other.
00:27:21.080 They have
00:27:22.640 different ideas.
00:27:24.600 The things that
00:27:25.260 RFK Jr.
00:27:26.080 would do are
00:27:26.700 very much not
00:27:27.500 the things that
00:27:28.280 Joe Biden
00:27:29.000 would do.
00:27:29.980 So if you're
00:27:30.680 looking at those
00:27:31.240 two, that's a
00:27:32.320 real choice,
00:27:33.700 wouldn't you say?
00:27:34.360 If you say,
00:27:35.640 oh, I like a
00:27:36.220 little bit more
00:27:36.720 of these Biden
00:27:37.340 opinions than
00:27:39.220 these RFK Jr.
00:27:40.400 opinions, that's
00:27:41.920 a real choice.
00:27:43.980 But if you look
00:27:44.900 at Trump and
00:27:46.440 DeSantis, the
00:27:47.940 only thing that's
00:27:49.000 different, because
00:27:50.980 their policies are
00:27:51.840 largely the same,
00:27:53.600 at least the
00:27:54.160 ones they're
00:27:54.720 serious about,
00:27:55.520 right?
00:27:55.820 They're largely
00:27:56.340 the same.
00:27:59.040 I don't know
00:27:59.900 how DeSantis
00:28:01.620 can make an
00:28:02.240 argument except
00:28:02.980 that he would
00:28:04.160 attract less
00:28:05.160 negative attention.
00:28:07.620 But what's
00:28:08.400 happening?
00:28:09.720 As soon as
00:28:10.440 DeSantis gets
00:28:11.220 some purchase,
00:28:13.640 MSNBC starts
00:28:14.900 calling him the
00:28:15.900 tiny Mussolini,
00:28:18.480 which is super
00:28:19.880 racist, by the
00:28:20.660 way.
00:28:23.440 Work with me
00:28:24.360 here for a
00:28:24.820 moment.
00:28:25.720 True or
00:28:26.120 false?
00:28:27.260 If the
00:28:28.500 Democrats are
00:28:29.180 calling Trump
00:28:30.040 Hitler, because 0.97
00:28:32.780 Trump is
00:28:33.340 German by
00:28:34.420 ancestry, and
00:28:36.300 they're calling
00:28:36.900 DeSantis
00:28:37.720 Mussolini, that's
00:28:40.940 not racist?
00:28:44.080 I mean,
00:28:44.880 seriously.
00:28:45.220 How is that
00:28:47.360 not super
00:28:48.360 obviously racist?
00:28:50.100 Like, that's
00:28:50.720 right out there.
00:28:52.240 Is there any
00:28:52.800 interpretation
00:28:53.300 needed?
00:28:53.780 I don't think
00:28:56.160 so.
00:28:57.220 That to me
00:28:57.900 looks 100%
00:28:59.340 cleanly racist.
00:29:02.520 Yeah.
00:29:03.840 So if we
00:29:05.080 get a
00:29:05.620 Cambodian-American
00:29:06.740 guy running for
00:29:07.560 president, are
00:29:08.180 they going to
00:29:08.480 call him
00:29:08.860 Pol Pot?
00:29:10.320 You betcha.
00:29:11.700 You betcha.
00:29:13.100 Do you know
00:29:13.500 why?
00:29:14.420 Because apparently
00:29:15.060 they can be
00:29:15.660 racist right in
00:29:16.460 front of you
00:29:16.840 without any
00:29:17.500 kind of
00:29:17.860 blowback.
00:29:19.240 There's no
00:29:19.820 blowback.
00:29:20.280 They can
00:29:21.020 just be
00:29:21.360 overtly 0.64
00:29:22.020 racist.
00:29:23.740 It's not
00:29:24.400 even a story,
00:29:25.280 because they
00:29:26.260 decided it
00:29:26.840 wasn't a
00:29:27.260 story.
00:29:28.560 And I
00:29:28.940 can't make
00:29:29.300 it a
00:29:29.520 story, so
00:29:30.520 it's just
00:29:30.800 not.
00:29:33.400 Yeah.
00:29:34.160 All right.
00:29:37.220 And this
00:29:37.960 is the
00:29:38.300 weirdest
00:29:38.560 story.
00:29:39.400 I do not
00:29:40.020 know what to
00:29:40.480 make of
00:29:40.780 this story.
00:29:41.220 So allegedly
00:29:43.040 there is
00:29:44.740 some document
00:29:45.540 called an
00:29:46.340 FD-1023,
00:29:48.940 which I'm
00:29:49.580 told they
00:29:50.360 don't, this
00:29:51.220 is an FBI
00:29:51.980 document that
00:29:53.260 writes up some
00:29:54.380 story from an
00:29:55.800 informant.
00:29:57.220 Now, my
00:29:58.940 understanding is
00:29:59.820 that they
00:30:00.260 don't use that
00:30:01.000 form unless
00:30:02.360 the informant
00:30:03.200 is credible,
00:30:04.780 in their
00:30:05.260 opinion.
00:30:07.080 So in
00:30:07.420 other words,
00:30:08.200 the form
00:30:08.740 itself is
00:30:09.400 telling you
00:30:09.820 that the
00:30:10.120 FBI believes
00:30:11.000 that it's
00:30:11.840 not necessarily
00:30:12.420 true, but
00:30:13.980 that the
00:30:14.580 source has
00:30:15.100 weight.
00:30:15.860 It's a
00:30:16.260 trusted
00:30:16.560 source.
00:30:18.020 And the
00:30:18.320 trusted
00:30:18.640 source,
00:30:20.420 allegedly,
00:30:22.540 but the
00:30:23.800 Republicans
00:30:24.560 haven't seen
00:30:25.200 it, they're
00:30:25.640 asking to
00:30:26.160 see it, but
00:30:27.120 there's some
00:30:27.480 whistleblower
00:30:28.020 that says it
00:30:28.440 exists, and
00:30:29.020 apparently
00:30:29.420 Director
00:30:30.440 Wray
00:30:30.840 confirms it
00:30:32.020 exists.
00:30:33.400 And it
00:30:33.700 seems to
00:30:34.200 show documented
00:30:35.960 evidence, this
00:30:36.820 is the claim,
00:30:37.760 this is not
00:30:38.360 confirmed,
00:30:39.560 documented
00:30:40.280 evidence of
00:30:41.060 the Biden
00:30:41.400 family taking
00:30:42.980 money for
00:30:43.800 political
00:30:45.100 favors, which
00:30:45.960 would be
00:30:46.260 illegal.
00:30:47.900 Now, question
00:30:49.540 number one,
00:30:50.880 do you believe
00:30:51.760 that if we
00:30:52.660 were to ever
00:30:53.140 see this
00:30:53.640 document,
00:30:54.480 because Comer
00:30:55.340 and whoever
00:30:57.520 else is trying
00:30:58.180 to get a hold
00:30:58.700 of it, but
00:30:59.440 the FBI
00:31:00.360 doesn't want
00:31:00.980 to give it
00:31:01.480 to them,
00:31:02.720 apparently
00:31:03.200 Director Wray
00:31:04.200 has offered
00:31:04.780 that they can
00:31:05.400 see it.
00:31:06.040 release, so
00:31:07.240 they can see
00:31:07.780 it in a
00:31:08.260 skiff, but 0.97
00:31:09.700 then the
00:31:10.120 Republicans are
00:31:10.940 saying that's
00:31:11.560 not good
00:31:11.960 enough, it
00:31:12.960 has to be
00:31:13.340 released.
00:31:14.620 Now, that's
00:31:16.700 kind of
00:31:16.960 interesting,
00:31:17.520 isn't it?
00:31:18.420 Because the
00:31:19.980 skiff would
00:31:21.400 tell me that
00:31:22.180 it's a pretty
00:31:23.180 big, if you
00:31:25.560 put it in the
00:31:26.040 skiff, that 0.95
00:31:26.560 means that
00:31:26.900 nobody can
00:31:27.340 take a copy,
00:31:28.220 they can only
00:31:28.900 go read it
00:31:29.520 in a protected
00:31:30.400 place.
00:31:31.320 That would
00:31:31.920 be for the
00:31:32.420 most sensitive
00:31:33.340 secrets, the
00:31:34.920 most sensitive
00:31:35.940 secrets.
00:31:37.240 What is it
00:31:38.000 about this
00:31:38.500 document that
00:31:39.220 makes it
00:31:39.600 that?
00:31:40.680 Why is this
00:31:41.380 a skiff-only
00:31:42.580 document?
00:31:43.720 Is it because
00:31:44.280 it's so
00:31:44.640 dangerous to
00:31:45.260 Biden?
00:31:47.200 Is it because
00:31:47.960 they don't
00:31:48.360 know if it's
00:31:48.800 true?
00:31:49.920 It could be
00:31:50.480 that they
00:31:50.780 don't know
00:31:51.080 if it's
00:31:51.360 true, which
00:31:52.860 would make
00:31:53.240 it dangerous,
00:31:54.580 right?
00:31:54.900 And that
00:31:55.220 would be a
00:31:55.540 good reason
00:31:55.920 to restrict
00:31:56.420 it, if
00:31:57.260 they didn't
00:31:57.620 think it
00:31:57.900 was true,
00:31:58.500 necessarily
00:31:59.100 true.
00:32:02.780 But
00:32:03.220 here's the
00:32:05.840 thing that's
00:32:06.220 missing in
00:32:06.660 the story.
00:32:08.920 Correct me
00:32:09.460 if I'm
00:32:09.740 wrong, but
00:32:10.940 at no time
00:32:11.640 has Director
00:32:12.780 Wray, who
00:32:14.100 seems to
00:32:14.660 confirm that
00:32:15.380 this document
00:32:15.980 exists, he
00:32:17.320 has never
00:32:17.740 characterized
00:32:18.320 it.
00:32:19.800 Is that
00:32:20.420 true?
00:32:23.000 He's only
00:32:23.660 said it
00:32:24.020 exists, but
00:32:25.440 he's not
00:32:25.800 characterized
00:32:26.420 it.
00:32:27.480 Isn't that
00:32:27.960 like really,
00:32:29.220 really missing?
00:32:30.840 Let me give
00:32:31.520 you an 0.64
00:32:31.720 example.
00:32:33.220 If he
00:32:34.100 knew that
00:32:34.580 it was
00:32:34.940 a big
00:32:35.400 nothing,
00:32:36.960 don't you
00:32:37.700 think he
00:32:38.020 would have
00:32:38.320 characterized
00:32:38.740 it as
00:32:39.500 a big
00:32:39.920 nothing, but
00:32:40.980 yes, you
00:32:41.400 can see
00:32:41.740 it.
00:32:42.500 I'll let
00:32:42.880 you see
00:32:43.140 it in
00:32:43.380 the skiff,
00:32:44.440 but I'm
00:32:44.820 telling you,
00:32:45.300 you're wasting
00:32:45.660 your time
00:32:46.120 because it's
00:32:46.520 a big
00:32:46.760 nothing.
00:32:48.280 Right?
00:32:49.020 So that
00:32:49.640 suggests to
00:32:50.780 me that
00:32:52.480 Director
00:32:52.960 Wray
00:32:53.320 thinks there's
00:32:54.140 some chance
00:32:54.740 it's a big
00:32:55.180 something.
00:32:58.560 Am I
00:32:59.140 wrong?
00:33:00.320 Because
00:33:00.720 otherwise,
00:33:01.340 he would
00:33:02.160 either give
00:33:02.760 it to
00:33:03.000 him.
00:33:03.700 Now, I
00:33:04.000 do understand
00:33:04.660 why you
00:33:05.020 might not
00:33:05.580 want to
00:33:05.820 give sensitive
00:33:06.800 things to
00:33:07.480 people, even
00:33:08.220 if they ask,
00:33:09.080 even if they
00:33:09.560 have a right.
00:33:10.440 There could
00:33:10.760 be real
00:33:11.600 security reasons
00:33:12.600 why you
00:33:12.940 don't do
00:33:13.220 that.
00:33:14.240 But not
00:33:15.000 characterizing it
00:33:16.000 is really
00:33:16.600 missing.
00:33:18.140 Or how
00:33:18.520 about this?
00:33:19.800 Yes, the
00:33:20.440 document exists,
00:33:21.680 and yes, I'll
00:33:22.520 let you see
00:33:22.980 it.
00:33:23.900 But my
00:33:24.380 issue is
00:33:25.040 that it's
00:33:25.520 not 100%
00:33:27.100 verified.
00:33:28.440 So it
00:33:29.800 might cause
00:33:30.400 more rumors
00:33:31.220 than it
00:33:32.700 should.
00:33:33.660 That would
00:33:34.260 be useful.
00:33:35.580 Right?
00:33:36.540 Wouldn't you
00:33:37.180 consider that
00:33:37.860 good and
00:33:38.500 useful
00:33:38.920 characterization
00:33:40.080 of it?
00:33:40.880 We don't
00:33:41.560 know if
00:33:41.860 it's true.
00:33:42.840 Therefore, if
00:33:43.380 you look at
00:33:43.860 it and get
00:33:44.200 all worked
00:33:44.740 up, that
00:33:45.660 might be
00:33:46.040 causing
00:33:46.300 problems.
00:33:46.880 But we'll
00:33:47.240 put it in
00:33:47.680 the skiff
00:33:48.100 so you can
00:33:49.000 see for
00:33:49.320 yourself.
00:33:49.660 I would
00:33:51.740 consider that
00:33:52.300 fairly credible
00:33:53.100 if he said
00:33:54.420 that.
00:33:55.500 But just
00:33:55.920 saying we
00:33:56.420 do have
00:33:57.000 it and
00:33:57.440 you can't
00:33:58.400 get a
00:33:58.680 copy suggests
00:34:00.600 that they
00:34:01.160 want to
00:34:01.520 keep the
00:34:02.140 ability to
00:34:02.960 mischaracterize
00:34:04.000 it.
00:34:05.100 In other
00:34:05.480 words, if
00:34:06.480 they let
00:34:06.800 the Republicans
00:34:07.340 in to look
00:34:08.040 at it, but
00:34:08.500 they couldn't
00:34:08.980 take a copy
00:34:09.660 and show
00:34:10.040 it to us,
00:34:11.380 then we
00:34:12.080 would have
00:34:12.380 to believe
00:34:12.840 the Republicans
00:34:13.480 point of
00:34:14.060 view.
00:34:15.200 And then
00:34:15.420 the Democrats
00:34:16.100 could simply
00:34:16.700 say, we
00:34:17.760 looked at
00:34:18.220 it too,
00:34:19.200 and it
00:34:19.560 doesn't
00:34:19.960 say that.
00:34:22.060 Right?
00:34:22.560 And then
00:34:22.860 that's the
00:34:23.180 end of the
00:34:23.480 story.
00:34:24.320 The Democrats
00:34:24.980 would say, we
00:34:25.460 looked at it
00:34:25.960 too, it
00:34:26.280 doesn't say
00:34:26.680 that.
00:34:28.500 That's all.
00:34:29.420 That's the
00:34:29.900 end of it.
00:34:30.660 And we
00:34:31.040 would never
00:34:31.420 know because
00:34:31.880 we can't
00:34:32.320 see it.
00:34:33.040 Then the
00:34:33.400 Republicans
00:34:33.780 would say,
00:34:34.440 you're lying, 0.52
00:34:35.340 it does
00:34:35.740 say that.
00:34:37.140 And the
00:34:37.540 Democrats
00:34:38.140 would say,
00:34:38.520 well, too
00:34:39.500 bad, nobody
00:34:40.500 else gets to
00:34:41.060 see it, and
00:34:41.460 we say it's
00:34:41.960 not there.
00:34:43.100 So it's a
00:34:43.540 tie.
00:34:46.880 Wow.
00:34:47.960 Now, I've
00:34:48.680 also heard,
00:34:49.560 that the
00:34:51.120 reason the
00:34:51.520 FBI or the
00:34:52.320 Department of
00:34:52.780 Justice is
00:34:53.860 allegedly slow
00:34:56.080 walking Hunter
00:34:57.140 Biden's
00:34:57.880 investigation, is
00:34:59.660 they're actually
00:35:00.240 trying to slow
00:35:01.140 walk it past the
00:35:02.420 statute of
00:35:03.140 limitations, and
00:35:04.960 they have a good
00:35:05.560 shot at doing
00:35:06.120 it.
00:35:07.460 Is that like
00:35:08.180 seven years or
00:35:08.980 something?
00:35:09.460 I don't know
00:35:10.060 what the actual
00:35:10.560 limit is for any
00:35:12.180 various allegations,
00:35:13.660 but it looks like
00:35:15.320 they've gone four
00:35:16.580 or five years?
00:35:19.240 How many years
00:35:20.140 have they dragged
00:35:20.760 it down so far?
00:35:22.840 And does that
00:35:23.540 mean that Joe
00:35:24.400 Biden, does that
00:35:26.800 mean that Joe
00:35:27.380 Biden needs to
00:35:28.840 have another four
00:35:29.720 years to get
00:35:31.820 Hunter over the
00:35:32.860 statute of
00:35:33.540 limitations?
00:35:34.540 Because I think
00:35:35.360 that nobody in the
00:35:36.080 government is going
00:35:36.800 to challenge the
00:35:37.500 president.
00:35:38.540 I think it's too
00:35:39.340 dangerous.
00:35:39.720 So I think that
00:35:41.780 if Joe Biden can
00:35:43.820 stay in office
00:35:44.480 four more years,
00:35:46.260 I think he can
00:35:47.140 pull Hunter over
00:35:48.220 the finish line
00:35:49.380 and get him past
00:35:49.920 the statute of
00:35:50.520 limitations.
00:35:51.520 Is that the
00:35:51.900 whole reason the
00:35:53.640 country is
00:35:54.300 being, you
00:35:56.720 know, suffering
00:35:57.580 under a Biden?
00:35:59.100 So he can keep
00:36:00.040 his son out of
00:36:00.580 jail?
00:36:01.260 Because if you
00:36:02.320 ask me why
00:36:03.000 somebody who's
00:36:03.700 400 years old
00:36:05.060 wants a second
00:36:05.740 term, I can only
00:36:07.780 think it's
00:36:08.240 personal.
00:36:09.720 That does not
00:36:10.880 seem political to
00:36:11.800 me.
00:36:13.920 Right?
00:36:14.820 It feels like Joe
00:36:16.220 is only running to
00:36:17.360 protect Hunter,
00:36:18.780 because he's the
00:36:19.280 only one who can
00:36:19.820 do it.
00:36:20.560 He is the only
00:36:21.020 one who can do
00:36:21.600 it.
00:36:22.400 You know, if you
00:36:22.800 put a Republican
00:36:24.020 and their Hunter's
00:36:24.840 in a lot of
00:36:25.260 trouble, I would
00:36:27.480 think.
00:36:28.160 Or Biden
00:36:28.880 probably thinks.
00:36:30.360 So let me ask
00:36:31.780 you, given that
00:36:33.500 there is one
00:36:35.320 source saying
00:36:37.680 this document
00:36:38.280 exists and that
00:36:39.160 it has damage
00:36:39.700 information on
00:36:40.500 it, do you
00:36:41.180 think that
00:36:41.560 that one
00:36:42.060 source, the
00:36:42.960 whistleblower,
00:36:44.740 maybe there's
00:36:45.500 more than one
00:36:46.000 whistleblower?
00:36:46.880 Give me a fact
00:36:47.480 check.
00:36:48.280 Is there more
00:36:48.940 than one
00:36:49.380 whistleblower who
00:36:51.300 has seen the
00:36:52.060 FD-1023 form
00:36:53.860 and says it's
00:36:54.860 damning?
00:36:56.020 Well, I'm 0.97
00:36:56.320 saying yes is
00:36:56.960 there's more
00:36:57.340 than one.
00:36:59.020 Okay.
00:36:59.540 More than one
00:37:00.260 changes the
00:37:00.920 story completely,
00:37:02.200 in my opinion.
00:37:03.500 If it were
00:37:04.660 only one, then
00:37:06.660 I would say,
00:37:07.700 well, that's a
00:37:09.220 wait and see.
00:37:11.040 If it's two or
00:37:12.040 three and they
00:37:13.260 separately have the
00:37:14.000 same story, then
00:37:16.220 I'd start to think
00:37:16.980 there's something
00:37:17.420 there.
00:37:18.820 But I guess I'm
00:37:21.760 expecting to be
00:37:24.880 underwhelmed if we
00:37:26.520 should ever see it.
00:37:28.180 I don't believe the
00:37:29.360 wall is closing it,
00:37:30.520 or the walls are
00:37:31.140 closing.
00:37:31.380 Do you?
00:37:33.200 Do you think
00:37:33.980 Comer has the
00:37:34.640 goods this time?
00:37:35.620 Because it feels
00:37:36.400 exactly like Schiff
00:37:38.020 chasing Trump.
00:37:40.300 The walls are
00:37:41.020 closing in.
00:37:42.000 It just doesn't
00:37:42.660 feel like it's
00:37:43.360 going to close
00:37:43.820 in.
00:37:47.680 The FBI will
00:37:48.880 release it after
00:37:49.920 Trump's arrest.
00:37:51.760 Maybe.
00:37:54.740 All right.
00:37:58.020 Here's the
00:37:58.840 latest hoax.
00:38:01.380 Trump hoax.
00:38:02.380 You know there's
00:38:02.860 going to be more.
00:38:04.300 But this is what I
00:38:05.280 call a double tap
00:38:06.400 hoax.
00:38:07.980 So a double tap
00:38:09.100 Trump hoax is
00:38:10.280 where they do the
00:38:12.100 hoax itself, and
00:38:13.980 then Trump reacts
00:38:15.380 to the hoax, and
00:38:17.480 the way he reacts
00:38:18.360 to the hoax creates
00:38:19.940 the second tap.
00:38:21.640 So for example,
00:38:23.760 they might say he's
00:38:25.200 trying to overthrow
00:38:25.880 the government, and
00:38:27.820 then he says, no,
00:38:28.980 I'm not, and
00:38:30.380 maybe I would fire
00:38:32.640 the people who
00:38:33.320 are investigating
00:38:34.640 me for this
00:38:35.240 because it's all
00:38:35.880 BS.
00:38:37.200 And then they
00:38:37.700 take the fact
00:38:38.280 that he would
00:38:38.760 fire the people 0.99
00:38:39.640 behind the 0.95
00:38:40.980 hoax as proof
00:38:43.400 that he's an
00:38:43.980 authoritarian.
00:38:46.200 So they get
00:38:46.920 two taps out of
00:38:47.760 one hoax.
00:38:48.760 The hoax
00:38:49.340 itself, and
00:38:50.800 then when he
00:38:51.220 says he'll react
00:38:52.080 to the hoax,
00:38:52.820 you know, by
00:38:53.160 getting rid of
00:38:53.640 the people who
00:38:54.860 persecuted him,
00:38:56.700 that he's an
00:38:57.380 authoritarian, a
00:38:58.860 second hoax.
00:39:01.120 They can hoax
00:39:02.040 themselves all the
00:39:02.800 way to the
00:39:03.120 bottom of the
00:39:03.540 well.
00:39:04.740 So the current
00:39:05.360 one is that
00:39:06.140 there's some
00:39:06.880 existence of
00:39:08.900 an audio in
00:39:10.660 which Trump
00:39:11.220 says he kept
00:39:12.160 some classified
00:39:12.880 documents related
00:39:14.740 to a plan to
00:39:15.680 attack Iran. 0.94
00:39:17.980 And apparently
00:39:18.860 it was General
00:39:20.720 Mark Milley's
00:39:21.840 write-up of his
00:39:23.700 plan for
00:39:24.340 attacking Iran, 0.93
00:39:25.360 which it
00:39:27.140 looks like
00:39:27.720 Trump may
00:39:28.740 have turned
00:39:29.160 down several
00:39:29.780 times.
00:39:31.400 Now, why do
00:39:32.200 you think
00:39:32.580 Trump would
00:39:33.320 want to keep
00:39:33.880 that document
00:39:34.720 of Mark
00:39:36.160 Milley with
00:39:37.680 an Iran 0.74
00:39:38.260 attack plan?
00:39:39.880 Why would
00:39:40.320 he want that?
00:39:41.600 Of all the
00:39:42.340 things he could
00:39:42.920 keep, why
00:39:43.420 would he want
00:39:43.900 that?
00:39:45.160 I have a
00:39:45.920 theory, because
00:39:47.840 it makes Mark
00:39:48.740 Milley look like 1.00
00:39:49.460 the dumbest 1.00
00:39:50.000 guy in the 1.00
00:39:50.460 world, and
00:39:51.920 a warmonger,
00:39:53.100 and somebody
00:39:53.720 who's going to
00:39:54.100 get you all 1.00
00:39:54.560 killed. 1.00
00:39:55.740 I think he 0.96
00:39:57.000 wanted that
00:39:57.500 document to
00:39:58.360 prove that his
00:39:59.560 generals were 1.00
00:40:00.260 idiots, because 1.00
00:40:01.800 he said that 1.00
00:40:02.320 directly, which
00:40:03.680 by the way, just
00:40:04.560 makes me love
00:40:05.220 him.
00:40:07.180 You know, I've
00:40:08.140 got lots of
00:40:08.580 things I can
00:40:09.100 complain about
00:40:09.900 Trump, just
00:40:11.220 like all of us
00:40:12.020 do.
00:40:12.500 I can come up
00:40:13.420 with a list.
00:40:14.460 It would look
00:40:14.920 a lot like
00:40:15.360 yours.
00:40:17.320 But when he
00:40:18.880 says that his
00:40:19.500 generals are 1.00
00:40:20.120 idiots, I 100% 1.00
00:40:22.400 believe him. 1.00
00:40:22.900 I actually
00:40:24.560 believe that
00:40:25.300 the man with
00:40:25.820 no military
00:40:26.560 experience,
00:40:27.480 Trump, would
00:40:28.920 be far more
00:40:30.120 trustworthy than
00:40:31.380 any of his
00:40:31.940 generals, because
00:40:33.620 the generals are
00:40:34.640 locked into the
00:40:35.400 military-industrial
00:40:36.340 complex, and that
00:40:37.980 makes them
00:40:38.400 completely non-credible.
00:40:40.540 I wouldn't
00:40:41.280 believe any of
00:40:41.880 them.
00:40:42.780 I don't think
00:40:43.260 they have any
00:40:43.840 credibility in
00:40:44.560 our current
00:40:44.940 system.
00:40:46.080 And Mark
00:40:46.460 Milley, in my
00:40:48.140 opinion, whenever
00:40:49.980 I see him
00:40:50.620 talk, I
00:40:51.720 think to
00:40:52.060 myself, why
00:40:53.540 does he seem 0.99
00:40:54.320 dumb? 0.99
00:40:56.460 Because there 1.00
00:40:57.280 are plenty of
00:40:58.000 politicians that
00:40:58.900 maybe are kind 1.00
00:40:59.940 of dumb, but 1.00
00:41:00.520 at least when 1.00
00:41:00.940 they talk in
00:41:01.500 public, they
00:41:02.500 can put on a
00:41:03.140 good show.
00:41:04.540 Don't you
00:41:04.960 think there
00:41:05.300 are some
00:41:05.720 politicians that
00:41:07.000 you think are
00:41:07.540 maybe not up to
00:41:08.440 the job?
00:41:09.260 But they can
00:41:09.820 still do a
00:41:10.320 speech, and it
00:41:11.660 still sounds good
00:41:12.880 for their side.
00:41:14.660 But Mark
00:41:15.180 Milley, no
00:41:16.620 matter what he
00:41:17.300 talked about, 0.99
00:41:17.920 looked dumb to 0.99
00:41:18.560 me, like he 0.99
00:41:19.600 just screams 1.00
00:41:20.140 dumb, and 0.99
00:41:21.500 that scares the 1.00
00:41:22.180 shit out of
00:41:22.700 me, because 0.99
00:41:23.580 he's the guy
00:41:24.080 with the
00:41:24.480 military might.
00:41:28.360 My guess, this
00:41:29.740 is just a
00:41:30.180 guess, just
00:41:30.740 speculation, I
00:41:31.900 think Trump
00:41:32.380 had the same
00:41:32.900 opinion of
00:41:33.440 him, that
00:41:34.300 he's actually 1.00
00:41:34.820 just dumb, and 1.00
00:41:36.760 he wanted a 1.00
00:41:37.360 document that
00:41:37.940 proved it.
00:41:39.820 That might be
00:41:40.600 why he had the
00:41:41.120 document.
00:41:41.560 I'm just
00:41:41.840 speculating, I
00:41:42.500 don't know.
00:41:42.900 I can't read
00:41:43.340 any minds.
00:41:46.040 All right.
00:41:48.560 So, there's
00:41:51.100 a study, CNN
00:41:52.240 had a little
00:41:53.340 article, that
00:41:54.920 says that people
00:41:55.580 who swear have
00:41:58.260 certain
00:41:58.580 characteristics.
00:42:00.280 Huh.
00:42:00.880 And there are
00:42:01.360 certain benefits
00:42:01.980 of swearing.
00:42:03.940 Do you know
00:42:04.800 anybody who
00:42:05.580 would fall into
00:42:06.140 this category?
00:42:07.980 Apparently, swearing
00:42:09.040 is correlated with
00:42:10.020 high intelligence.
00:42:12.600 But only if you
00:42:13.560 do it well.
00:42:14.560 You know, if
00:42:14.820 you're just doing
00:42:15.920 F-bombs and
00:42:16.940 N-words and
00:42:18.320 stuff, you
00:42:18.940 know, that's
00:42:19.440 not the clever
00:42:20.020 kind of swearing.
00:42:21.680 But apparently,
00:42:22.460 it's correlated
00:42:22.960 with high
00:42:23.400 intelligence.
00:42:24.480 Swearing is a 0.70
00:42:25.100 sign of honesty.
00:42:26.780 It can lower, it
00:42:28.100 can improve your
00:42:28.940 pain tolerance, and
00:42:30.060 it's correlated
00:42:31.420 with creativity.
00:42:35.780 So, do you
00:42:36.700 know what I say
00:42:37.440 when a study says
00:42:38.740 that swearing is
00:42:41.380 correlated with
00:42:41.900 high intelligence,
00:42:42.720 honesty, lower
00:42:43.880 pain tolerance, and
00:42:44.720 creativity? 1.00
00:42:45.220 Fuck yeah. 1.00
00:42:48.760 Yeah. 1.00
00:42:51.280 All right.
00:42:52.300 University of
00:42:53.040 North Carolina
00:42:53.720 Medical School.
00:42:56.520 This is my
00:42:57.760 favorite story of
00:42:58.560 the day.
00:42:59.620 They, too, had a
00:43:00.960 DEI task force
00:43:02.680 that came up with
00:43:04.660 some suggestions.
00:43:09.040 And when they
00:43:09.960 came up with
00:43:10.480 their suggestions,
00:43:11.900 and the
00:43:12.440 University of
00:43:13.360 North Carolina
00:43:14.640 Medical School
00:43:15.420 looked at the
00:43:16.060 suggestions, they
00:43:17.540 thought the best
00:43:18.140 thing they could
00:43:18.640 do was disband
00:43:19.900 the DEI task
00:43:21.000 force.
00:43:24.420 I got a
00:43:25.240 suggestion for
00:43:25.960 you.
00:43:26.700 How about
00:43:27.060 everything you did
00:43:27.940 is a complete
00:43:28.460 waste of time and 0.99
00:43:29.340 ridiculous, and 0.99
00:43:30.560 you're all fired. 1.00
00:43:33.620 So that's what
00:43:34.500 happened there.
00:43:35.060 some of their
00:43:37.560 recommendations were
00:43:38.560 that the
00:43:39.520 medical students
00:43:40.560 there would be
00:43:42.060 required to
00:43:42.580 study topics
00:43:43.340 such as,
00:43:44.220 quote,
00:43:44.960 unconscious bias
00:43:46.180 awareness,
00:43:47.620 understanding and
00:43:48.480 responding to
00:43:49.180 microaggressions,
00:43:50.820 and, quote,
00:43:51.640 understanding that
00:43:52.560 America's medical
00:43:53.540 system is
00:43:54.260 structurally racist.
00:43:57.200 And the
00:43:57.960 administrators at
00:43:58.780 the school said,
00:43:59.680 well, how about we
00:44:00.360 just get rid of all 0.99
00:44:01.100 of you guys, and 0.89
00:44:02.640 then everything's
00:44:03.300 fine.
00:44:06.380 All right, well,
00:44:07.140 you're going to
00:44:07.360 see more of
00:44:07.800 that.
00:44:10.180 So there's
00:44:11.000 evidence now from
00:44:12.340 the Democrats that
00:44:14.240 the GOP apparently
00:44:15.900 was willing to
00:44:17.400 default, to let
00:44:19.400 America default on
00:44:20.800 its obligations if
00:44:22.960 they didn't get
00:44:23.680 some changes to
00:44:24.860 the debt relief
00:44:26.660 and budget.
00:44:28.220 Now, I heard
00:44:30.180 that described as
00:44:31.360 Republicans'
00:44:33.300 being either
00:44:35.040 reckless or bad
00:44:36.020 or dangerous or
00:44:37.120 something, because
00:44:39.240 it was Representative
00:44:41.420 Lew who was
00:44:42.180 saying it.
00:44:42.900 So that was a
00:44:43.640 Democrat's perspective,
00:44:45.240 is that the
00:44:45.600 Republicans were
00:44:46.420 really, really on
00:44:47.980 dangerous territory,
00:44:49.640 and were literally
00:44:50.560 willing to let the
00:44:51.480 country default,
00:44:53.540 default, if they
00:44:55.300 didn't get their
00:44:56.180 Republican stuff into
00:44:57.320 the legislation.
00:44:59.460 Now, what do you
00:45:00.520 think about that?
00:45:03.060 To which I say,
00:45:04.820 finally, finally,
00:45:07.460 they weren't
00:45:08.520 bluffing.
00:45:09.740 Do you know the
00:45:10.580 best bluff if
00:45:11.820 you're negotiating?
00:45:12.880 The best bluff is
00:45:13.980 not bluffing.
00:45:16.060 You're actually
00:45:16.760 willing to do the
00:45:17.580 thing you're willing
00:45:18.160 to do, and there's
00:45:18.920 no doubt about it.
00:45:20.340 Apparently the
00:45:21.020 Republicans, and
00:45:22.920 I'm going to give
00:45:23.580 them a sitting
00:45:24.160 ovation for this,
00:45:25.620 apparently McCarthy
00:45:26.640 convinced the
00:45:28.020 Democrats that in
00:45:29.140 the real world,
00:45:30.320 they would prefer
00:45:30.940 default over the
00:45:32.180 Democrats' plans.
00:45:34.560 And do you know
00:45:34.940 what?
00:45:35.100 I agree.
00:45:36.000 I would have
00:45:36.580 preferred that the
00:45:38.740 government default
00:45:39.580 with all of the
00:45:40.980 disruption that
00:45:41.660 causes.
00:45:42.820 I prefer that.
00:45:44.380 And apparently the
00:45:45.140 Republicans were
00:45:46.140 ballsy enough to
00:45:47.200 prefer it and also
00:45:48.180 communicate it.
00:45:49.620 And they sold it
00:45:50.880 because they got
00:45:52.440 some stuff.
00:45:53.080 Now, nobody gets
00:45:53.780 everything, right?
00:45:54.620 We get to complain
00:45:55.760 about your own
00:45:56.620 side.
00:45:57.380 This is when you do
00:45:58.420 that.
00:45:59.620 But if I had a
00:46:02.940 complaint about
00:46:03.600 that, it would be
00:46:04.380 that they should
00:46:04.960 have gotten
00:46:05.260 more.
00:46:08.440 Here's what I'd
00:46:09.160 like.
00:46:10.220 I'd like to see
00:46:11.040 some legislation
00:46:11.860 that says if we
00:46:13.760 don't reduce our
00:46:15.740 debt by X amount
00:46:17.140 in the coming
00:46:18.320 budget requirements,
00:46:19.920 or budget
00:46:20.400 negotiations, that
00:46:22.040 there's no
00:46:22.460 negotiations.
00:46:24.560 That if we miss
00:46:25.400 our target this
00:46:26.160 year, and let's
00:46:27.060 say the national
00:46:28.020 debt increases,
00:46:29.660 if the national
00:46:30.280 debt increases,
00:46:31.700 I would like
00:46:32.220 legislation that
00:46:33.780 says next
00:46:34.980 year, every
00:46:36.160 budget item will
00:46:37.020 be cut by the
00:46:38.020 same percentage.
00:46:39.720 1%, 5%,
00:46:41.320 whatever it is.
00:46:43.200 You don't think
00:46:43.860 that every budget
00:46:44.740 could be cut by
00:46:45.500 5%?
00:46:47.120 Yeah, it
00:46:47.480 could.
00:46:48.360 It could.
00:46:50.040 That's how every
00:46:51.020 big business does
00:46:51.980 this.
00:46:52.440 Because I used
00:46:53.140 to work in the
00:46:54.920 budgeting and
00:46:55.700 forecasting parts of
00:46:57.220 big businesses.
00:46:58.340 That was primarily
00:46:59.260 my job, budget
00:47:00.520 forecasting.
00:47:02.020 And I can't tell
00:47:04.620 you how many times
00:47:05.460 I went through the
00:47:06.140 following process.
00:47:08.080 I would talk to
00:47:09.300 each manager and
00:47:10.460 find out what
00:47:11.020 budget they needed
00:47:11.800 for the year.
00:47:12.820 I would sum them
00:47:13.640 all up, and I'd
00:47:14.640 take them to the
00:47:15.240 big boss, and it 0.51
00:47:16.420 would be more than
00:47:17.240 the big boss thought
00:47:18.220 he could get for
00:47:19.840 his budget.
00:47:20.880 And he'd say,
00:47:21.800 all right, this is
00:47:22.320 great, just tell
00:47:23.040 everybody to cut
00:47:24.040 by 10%.
00:47:26.000 And I would say,
00:47:27.480 oh, wait, wait,
00:47:29.060 that's crazy.
00:47:30.220 That's crazy.
00:47:31.260 These people did a
00:47:32.240 lot of work to
00:47:33.540 figure out how
00:47:34.080 much they really
00:47:35.420 need to do the
00:47:37.080 job.
00:47:38.060 If you just cut
00:47:38.960 them 10%, there'll
00:47:39.760 be all these people
00:47:40.400 who just can't do
00:47:41.080 the thing.
00:47:42.360 Your whole
00:47:42.940 operation will
00:47:43.660 evaporate.
00:47:45.600 And then the top
00:47:46.760 manager looked at
00:47:47.600 me, and he smiled,
00:47:48.520 and he said, tell
00:47:51.400 them to cut
00:47:51.800 everything 10%.
00:47:52.760 And I fussed
00:47:55.980 a little bit
00:47:56.380 more, and then
00:47:58.220 he said, 10%.
00:48:00.260 And I walked
00:48:02.520 out, and I told
00:48:03.160 everybody to cut
00:48:03.840 their budget by
00:48:04.460 10%.
00:48:05.040 Do you know
00:48:05.360 what happened?
00:48:06.580 They all cut
00:48:07.320 their budget by
00:48:07.820 10%, and
00:48:08.360 everything was
00:48:08.780 fine.
00:48:10.100 They all cut
00:48:10.880 their budget by
00:48:11.420 10%, everything
00:48:12.780 was fine.
00:48:13.960 Everything.
00:48:15.360 Everything was
00:48:16.060 fine.
00:48:18.220 You don't think
00:48:18.960 the government
00:48:19.400 can do that?
00:48:21.020 Of course they
00:48:21.780 can.
00:48:22.500 Of course they
00:48:23.080 can.
00:48:23.660 And the worst
00:48:24.600 thing we could
00:48:25.100 do is let
00:48:26.500 Congress negotiate
00:48:27.520 the details.
00:48:28.980 That's the worst
00:48:29.720 thing you could
00:48:30.160 do, which is
00:48:31.260 what they do.
00:48:32.420 Don't let them
00:48:33.160 negotiate details.
00:48:34.860 Just tell them
00:48:35.380 they have 10%
00:48:36.140 less for everything
00:48:37.900 next year, and
00:48:39.800 you're done.
00:48:41.040 Now, suppose
00:48:41.660 there's a new
00:48:42.260 thing you need,
00:48:42.960 some, let's
00:48:44.060 say, AI
00:48:44.960 legislation
00:48:47.160 group, you
00:48:48.380 know, some
00:48:48.640 group that
00:48:49.220 manages AI
00:48:50.660 federally, so
00:48:51.540 you need to
00:48:51.900 fund them.
00:48:52.780 Okay, 100%
00:48:54.920 of all that
00:48:55.440 money for the
00:48:56.000 new thing
00:48:56.440 comes out of
00:48:57.820 the existing
00:48:58.340 things in an
00:48:59.880 equal way.
00:49:01.180 So for the
00:49:01.860 new thing,
00:49:02.440 everybody is,
00:49:03.080 you know, 0.01%
00:49:04.260 less in their
00:49:05.700 budget.
00:49:06.280 So it's not
00:49:06.860 just 10%,
00:49:07.520 it's 10.02.
00:49:11.000 Everybody
00:49:11.440 could live
00:49:11.940 with that.
00:49:13.340 Now you say
00:49:13.940 to yourself,
00:49:14.480 well, but what
00:49:15.080 about the things
00:49:15.600 that are based
00:49:15.960 on population,
00:49:16.780 you know, such
00:49:18.220 as there are
00:49:18.720 just more
00:49:19.200 people who
00:49:19.820 need more
00:49:20.240 services, to
00:49:21.440 which I say,
00:49:22.240 figure it
00:49:22.620 out.
00:49:23.660 Figure it
00:49:24.200 out.
00:49:24.520 It's how
00:49:24.800 businesses do
00:49:25.420 it.
00:49:26.380 They have to
00:49:27.360 do more
00:49:27.780 with less
00:49:28.380 all the
00:49:29.740 time.
00:49:30.960 They don't
00:49:31.540 have a
00:49:31.760 choice.
00:49:32.320 You're always
00:49:32.900 doing more
00:49:33.400 with less.
00:49:33.940 It's just
00:49:34.200 the basic
00:49:34.740 management
00:49:35.660 reality.
00:49:39.220 So I
00:49:41.060 would like
00:49:41.480 our government
00:49:43.060 to do less,
00:49:44.420 and if they
00:49:44.920 can't hit the,
00:49:45.700 well, here's
00:49:46.580 the way I
00:49:46.920 would put it.
00:49:48.900 Every one of
00:49:49.620 the individual
00:49:50.340 budget things
00:49:51.120 that the
00:49:51.440 government needs
00:49:52.160 are important
00:49:52.940 in their own
00:49:54.060 way, but
00:49:55.540 they're all
00:49:56.020 subsidiary to
00:49:56.860 the fact that
00:49:57.380 you can't
00:49:57.780 spend more
00:49:58.220 than you
00:49:58.480 have forever.
00:50:00.240 So that
00:50:00.800 just has to
00:50:01.300 be a bigger
00:50:01.760 objective.
00:50:03.640 And if we
00:50:04.000 can't agree
00:50:04.640 on a budget
00:50:05.460 that would
00:50:05.920 reduce it,
00:50:07.420 it just has
00:50:08.040 to be 10%
00:50:08.680 across the
00:50:09.240 board, or
00:50:09.700 whatever the
00:50:10.200 percent is,
00:50:11.600 and just
00:50:12.300 move on.
00:50:14.600 All right.
00:50:15.700 But I
00:50:16.160 like the
00:50:16.540 fact that
00:50:17.320 the original
00:50:19.160 death-sealing
00:50:19.880 idea from
00:50:20.600 the Democrats
00:50:21.320 was so
00:50:22.320 bad that
00:50:24.600 Republicans
00:50:25.160 were literally
00:50:26.140 willing to
00:50:26.760 default the
00:50:27.380 whole country
00:50:28.020 to not do
00:50:29.220 it.
00:50:30.700 And like I
00:50:31.280 say, that's
00:50:32.040 a sitting
00:50:32.380 ovation.
00:50:33.440 I'd give you
00:50:34.060 a standing
00:50:34.460 ovation if
00:50:35.200 maybe they
00:50:35.720 got a little
00:50:36.120 bit more,
00:50:36.820 reduced the
00:50:37.380 debt more,
00:50:37.960 or something
00:50:38.160 like that.
00:50:38.960 But that's
00:50:39.580 a sitting
00:50:39.920 ovation.
00:50:41.240 That's
00:50:41.640 adequate.
00:50:42.480 That's an
00:50:43.000 adequate job.
00:50:43.580 So good
00:50:44.800 on adequate
00:50:45.760 for McCarthy.
00:50:48.600 All right.
00:50:49.340 Not ideal,
00:50:50.260 but adequate.
00:50:52.740 Well, I'm
00:50:53.380 pretty sure
00:50:53.800 this is the
00:50:54.280 best live
00:50:54.780 stream you're
00:50:55.260 going to
00:50:55.420 see today.
00:50:56.040 Is there
00:50:56.220 any story
00:50:56.560 I forgot?
00:50:58.560 Anything
00:50:59.000 that you
00:50:59.480 were hoping
00:51:00.000 I would
00:51:00.400 talk about
00:51:01.020 that I
00:51:01.720 didn't?
00:51:05.520 What
00:51:05.920 convinced the
00:51:06.540 Democrats
00:51:06.900 they were
00:51:07.280 serious?
00:51:08.120 Probably just
00:51:08.780 the way they
00:51:09.320 acted and
00:51:10.100 the fact that
00:51:10.740 there weren't
00:51:13.620 enough people
00:51:14.140 breaking with
00:51:14.900 the majority,
00:51:15.640 I guess.
00:51:22.980 What
00:51:23.500 companies have
00:51:24.220 you successfully
00:51:24.940 run with
00:51:25.580 verifiable
00:51:26.160 proof?
00:51:27.180 Whenever you
00:51:27.760 talk about
00:51:28.220 your past,
00:51:28.840 you always
00:51:29.140 claim whatever
00:51:29.760 the topic
00:51:30.260 is you
00:51:30.740 used to
00:51:31.180 do.
00:51:33.740 What
00:51:34.220 made you
00:51:34.620 such a 1.00
00:51:35.020 douchebag? 0.99
00:51:36.340 Was there
00:51:36.720 something that
00:51:37.340 hurt you?
00:51:39.200 Did somebody
00:51:40.300 touch you
00:51:40.780 in the
00:51:41.000 wrong way?
00:51:42.360 Why would
00:51:42.960 you even
00:51:43.220 ask that
00:51:43.600 question in
00:51:44.100 such an 1.00
00:51:44.440 asshole way? 1.00
00:51:47.220 I might 0.97
00:51:47.960 be the
00:51:48.320 most easily
00:51:49.060 verifiable
00:51:49.780 person in
00:51:50.440 the world.
00:51:52.380 Do you
00:51:52.640 know how
00:51:52.920 many thousands
00:51:53.640 of people
00:51:54.220 are completely
00:51:55.920 aware that
00:51:56.600 I had the
00:51:57.160 jobs that
00:51:57.660 I say I
00:51:58.120 had and
00:51:59.120 how easy
00:51:59.560 it would
00:51:59.840 be to
00:52:00.240 check it?
00:52:01.900 Has
00:52:02.140 anybody ever
00:52:02.720 doubted it?
00:52:03.620 Like you
00:52:03.980 don't think
00:52:04.340 I worked
00:52:04.680 for a
00:52:04.960 bank and
00:52:06.160 did budgets?
00:52:08.920 Really?
00:52:09.360 Would I
00:52:10.140 make that
00:52:10.540 up?
00:52:11.380 I just
00:52:11.700 made up
00:52:12.080 a whole
00:52:12.280 job and
00:52:13.380 I thought
00:52:13.680 I'd get
00:52:13.940 away with
00:52:14.320 it.
00:52:15.000 Is that
00:52:15.300 what you
00:52:15.520 think?
00:52:18.840 Yeah,
00:52:19.420 Trump
00:52:19.740 increased
00:52:20.420 the debt
00:52:21.140 as well.
00:52:22.400 Absolutely.
00:52:23.620 Yeah,
00:52:23.960 I think we
00:52:25.120 can be
00:52:25.540 adult enough
00:52:26.260 to say
00:52:26.640 Trump did
00:52:27.200 some things
00:52:27.740 great,
00:52:28.880 some things
00:52:29.480 average,
00:52:30.040 and some
00:52:30.520 things you
00:52:30.920 absolutely
00:52:31.300 wish he
00:52:31.700 didn't do.
00:52:33.220 Anybody
00:52:33.620 have a
00:52:33.920 problem with
00:52:34.260 that?
00:52:36.040 Why can't
00:52:36.880 we just
00:52:37.180 talk about
00:52:37.580 it honestly?
00:52:38.020 Some
00:52:39.500 stuff
00:52:39.780 great,
00:52:40.300 some
00:52:40.480 stuff
00:52:40.740 average,
00:52:41.400 some
00:52:41.700 stuff
00:52:42.000 totally
00:52:42.480 wish
00:52:42.680 he
00:52:42.800 hadn't
00:52:42.960 done.
00:52:44.600 And that
00:52:45.060 would be
00:52:45.340 true for
00:52:45.720 all the
00:52:46.260 presidents,
00:52:47.340 but I
00:52:47.780 mean,
00:52:48.660 we're just
00:52:49.280 going to be 1.00
00:52:49.560 like idiots 1.00
00:52:50.060 if we just 1.00
00:52:50.880 say he's
00:52:51.500 the golden
00:52:52.280 boy and
00:52:53.100 does no
00:52:53.840 wrong.
00:52:54.760 Yeah,
00:52:55.160 I'm not on
00:52:55.760 that train.
00:52:56.860 Now I
00:52:57.120 know it
00:52:57.400 seemed like
00:52:58.000 that in
00:52:58.720 2016,
00:53:00.080 because I
00:53:01.000 kept telling
00:53:01.460 you that the
00:53:01.980 things other
00:53:02.420 people said
00:53:02.940 were mistakes
00:53:03.740 were not
00:53:04.160 mistakes,
00:53:04.940 but that's
00:53:05.680 because I
00:53:06.140 was right.
00:53:06.720 it's just
00:53:09.200 because I
00:53:09.600 was right.
00:53:10.200 That's why
00:53:10.540 I said
00:53:10.840 it.
00:53:14.100 All right.
00:53:20.020 Oh,
00:53:20.620 Twitter banned
00:53:21.200 the What is a
00:53:21.960 Woman documentary
00:53:22.820 today for
00:53:23.520 hate speech
00:53:24.120 and misgendering.
00:53:26.200 And Matt
00:53:26.880 Walsh is
00:53:27.380 threatened to
00:53:27.800 walk away
00:53:28.120 from Twitter.
00:53:30.180 Huh.
00:53:31.880 Twitter banned
00:53:32.740 What is a
00:53:33.380 Woman.
00:53:33.600 So that's
00:53:34.420 the little
00:53:36.080 Matt
00:53:36.420 Walsh
00:53:36.920 video.
00:53:40.180 That's
00:53:40.580 interesting.
00:53:41.220 I need to
00:53:41.880 know more
00:53:42.180 about that.
00:53:42.700 I don't
00:53:42.860 know if
00:53:43.080 that's a
00:53:43.420 Musk decision
00:53:44.240 or not.
00:53:45.460 Might be.
00:53:46.160 By the way,
00:53:46.660 Elon Musk
00:53:47.240 is back to
00:53:48.180 richest man
00:53:49.640 in the world.
00:53:50.900 Although I
00:53:51.460 don't think
00:53:51.740 that's real.
00:53:53.240 Do you
00:53:53.540 think that
00:53:53.860 we know
00:53:54.200 who the
00:53:54.480 richest
00:53:54.760 person in
00:53:56.080 the world
00:53:56.360 is?
00:53:59.260 Because I
00:53:59.880 think you
00:54:00.180 have to
00:54:00.540 include the
00:54:02.120 dictators as
00:54:03.080 owning all
00:54:03.660 of the
00:54:04.060 wealth of
00:54:04.540 the nation,
00:54:05.080 right?
00:54:05.780 Because they
00:54:06.280 have control
00:54:07.100 over it.
00:54:08.800 So I
00:54:09.220 would imagine
00:54:09.700 you've got
00:54:10.120 some Arab
00:54:11.440 nation oil
00:54:12.940 countries that
00:54:13.780 are bigger.
00:54:15.860 Tate.
00:54:16.420 Is there
00:54:16.760 some Andrew
00:54:17.500 Tate news
00:54:18.320 coming out?
00:54:24.700 Yeah,
00:54:25.380 the Vatican
00:54:25.920 may be.
00:54:28.140 Ye and
00:54:28.560 Adidas.
00:54:29.420 What's up
00:54:29.880 with Ye and
00:54:30.400 Adidas?
00:54:30.860 I don't know
00:54:31.200 anything about
00:54:31.620 that.
00:54:33.040 Can you
00:54:33.300 believe that
00:54:33.740 Ye got
00:54:34.200 married?
00:54:36.640 Isn't that
00:54:37.220 weird?
00:54:38.680 I was not
00:54:39.420 expecting him
00:54:40.000 to get
00:54:40.220 married again.
00:54:41.220 Yeah,
00:54:41.400 he got
00:54:41.560 married again.
00:54:43.280 To a
00:54:43.640 woman, 1.00
00:54:44.620 they say.
00:54:48.660 Why is
00:54:49.320 RFK wrong
00:54:50.040 that nuke
00:54:50.460 plants should
00:54:50.980 be able to
00:54:51.400 get private
00:54:51.860 insurance if
00:54:52.580 they're truly
00:54:53.040 safe?
00:54:54.400 Well,
00:54:55.180 he's wrong
00:54:55.800 because the
00:54:56.460 insurance
00:54:57.280 business,
00:55:01.780 business is
00:55:03.220 probably
00:55:03.560 looking at
00:55:04.160 older models
00:55:05.040 and looking
00:55:05.980 at the
00:55:06.260 past.
00:55:07.640 So just
00:55:09.080 as we're
00:55:09.460 talking,
00:55:09.880 insurance
00:55:10.200 should be
00:55:10.600 able to
00:55:10.840 look at
00:55:11.060 the future.
00:55:11.580 They should
00:55:12.360 also be
00:55:13.000 able to
00:55:13.240 look at
00:55:13.480 the past.
00:55:14.420 But the
00:55:14.780 past is
00:55:15.240 misleading.
00:55:15.660 So this
00:55:17.100 is another
00:55:17.500 case where
00:55:18.240 if the
00:55:18.700 insurance
00:55:19.060 companies
00:55:19.540 could base
00:55:20.820 on what
00:55:21.320 the future
00:55:21.840 looks like
00:55:22.400 versus how
00:55:23.120 things have
00:55:23.600 gone in
00:55:23.940 the past,
00:55:24.760 they would
00:55:25.200 make different
00:55:25.700 decisions.
00:55:26.700 In my
00:55:27.120 opinion,
00:55:28.280 nuclear
00:55:29.140 plants should
00:55:30.280 be insured
00:55:30.840 by the
00:55:31.360 government
00:55:31.740 and the
00:55:33.420 company
00:55:33.740 itself,
00:55:34.360 because the
00:55:34.840 company
00:55:35.040 itself might
00:55:35.540 go out of
00:55:35.860 business if
00:55:36.400 something goes
00:55:36.800 bad.
00:55:37.620 But I
00:55:38.200 don't think
00:55:38.580 that private
00:55:39.060 insurance
00:55:39.500 companies should
00:55:40.120 be in the
00:55:40.440 business of
00:55:41.120 insuring
00:55:41.640 nukes.
00:55:42.840 And the
00:55:43.720 reason is
00:55:44.340 that if
00:55:45.860 anything goes
00:55:46.440 wrong with
00:55:46.800 a nuclear
00:55:47.220 plant,
00:55:48.040 potentially,
00:55:49.820 it could be
00:55:51.060 really expensive.
00:55:52.880 So that
00:55:53.920 might be more
00:55:54.500 than a
00:55:55.240 company wants
00:55:55.800 to take a
00:55:56.240 risk of.
00:55:57.020 So they
00:55:57.340 might make
00:55:57.840 all kinds
00:55:58.740 of money
00:55:59.060 for 20
00:55:59.640 years.
00:56:00.600 One
00:56:01.160 meltdown
00:56:01.880 could wipe
00:56:03.200 out their
00:56:03.580 profitability
00:56:04.120 for the
00:56:04.580 whole 20
00:56:05.000 years.
00:56:06.140 So from
00:56:07.920 an economic
00:56:08.520 model perspective,
00:56:09.980 it's not that
00:56:10.720 insurance companies
00:56:11.640 are smarter
00:56:12.260 than we
00:56:12.700 are, it's
00:56:13.680 just that
00:56:14.060 the size
00:56:14.580 of the
00:56:14.820 risk is
00:56:15.280 a government
00:56:15.760 size, not
00:56:16.480 a company
00:56:16.900 size.
00:56:17.680 Does that
00:56:18.120 make sense?
00:56:19.260 Did I sell
00:56:19.800 that?
00:56:21.500 It's just
00:56:22.140 that the
00:56:22.520 nature of
00:56:23.060 the risk
00:56:23.640 is, I
00:56:26.360 think, it's
00:56:26.680 very small
00:56:27.220 risk, but
00:56:28.400 that's why
00:56:28.720 you have
00:56:28.960 insurance.
00:56:29.900 You know,
00:56:30.160 there's a
00:56:30.500 small risk
00:56:31.200 that I will
00:56:31.740 die today,
00:56:33.160 but I have 0.88
00:56:34.280 insurance
00:56:34.760 today.
00:56:36.700 You know,
00:56:36.940 even those
00:56:37.400 are very
00:56:38.260 small risks
00:56:39.020 that I'll
00:56:39.860 die today.
00:56:40.920 So it's
00:56:41.400 very common
00:56:41.960 to have
00:56:42.340 insurance for
00:56:43.560 something of
00:56:44.200 which the
00:56:44.640 actual risk
00:56:45.420 is very
00:56:45.920 small, but
00:56:47.640 if it
00:56:47.960 happened, it
00:56:48.420 would be
00:56:48.640 very bad,
00:56:49.740 right?
00:56:50.120 If I
00:56:50.580 died today, 0.56
00:56:51.720 that'd be
00:56:52.060 very bad.
00:56:55.060 But very,
00:56:55.920 very small
00:56:56.260 risk.
00:56:56.880 So I think
00:56:57.280 it's just a
00:56:58.120 country-sized
00:56:59.020 risk and
00:56:59.740 not an
00:57:00.520 insurance
00:57:01.560 company risk.
00:57:02.540 And the
00:57:02.880 reason a
00:57:03.580 country could
00:57:04.220 take it
00:57:04.620 on is
00:57:05.880 because the
00:57:06.400 country gets
00:57:06.960 a benefit
00:57:07.420 that the
00:57:07.980 insurance
00:57:08.400 company does
00:57:09.260 not get.
00:57:09.800 if you're
00:57:10.720 managing a
00:57:11.300 country, you
00:57:12.980 want energy
00:57:13.640 to be as
00:57:14.360 available as
00:57:15.000 possible.
00:57:15.720 If you're
00:57:16.280 managing an
00:57:17.060 insurance
00:57:17.500 company, then
00:57:18.920 you're just
00:57:19.200 looking at
00:57:19.560 actuarial
00:57:20.240 tables.
00:57:20.760 You're not
00:57:21.340 looking at
00:57:21.740 the benefit
00:57:22.720 of the
00:57:23.000 country so
00:57:23.500 much.
00:57:27.580 Are the
00:57:28.380 Rolls-Royce
00:57:29.180 new plants
00:57:30.060 insurable?
00:57:31.620 Good question.
00:57:32.820 So Rolls-Royce
00:57:33.560 is making
00:57:34.020 these small
00:57:35.080 modular reactors,
00:57:36.460 and they
00:57:37.480 are in the
00:57:38.000 business of
00:57:38.500 making them.
00:57:39.600 They're not
00:57:40.040 thinking about
00:57:40.720 it, they're
00:57:41.100 in the
00:57:41.440 business of
00:57:41.900 making them.
00:57:42.960 Did they
00:57:43.340 get insurance?
00:57:46.700 That would
00:57:47.220 be the
00:57:47.460 question, right?
00:57:48.140 Don't you
00:57:48.600 assume they
00:57:48.980 did?
00:57:49.900 Because I
00:57:50.280 doubt they'd
00:57:50.680 be operating
00:57:51.200 if they
00:57:51.520 didn't have
00:57:51.920 it.
00:57:53.640 Maybe.
00:57:54.340 I mean, if
00:57:54.700 they're still
00:57:55.920 using some
00:57:56.480 kind of venture
00:57:57.120 capital or
00:57:57.720 something, maybe
00:57:58.700 they don't
00:57:59.020 have insurance.
00:57:59.640 I think
00:58:06.460 State Farm
00:58:07.160 is only
00:58:07.740 not going
00:58:08.300 to insure
00:58:09.040 for new
00:58:11.040 accounts, so
00:58:12.240 they're going
00:58:12.520 to service,
00:58:14.080 you know, if
00:58:14.440 you already
00:58:14.740 have the
00:58:15.060 insurance, you're
00:58:15.600 good.
00:58:16.820 I don't know
00:58:17.460 if you can
00:58:17.780 renew it, though.
00:58:18.560 You might not
00:58:19.100 be able to
00:58:19.460 renew it.
00:58:21.760 No, they 1.00
00:58:22.340 don't.
00:58:22.980 They're
00:58:23.180 self-insured.
00:58:24.140 You actually
00:58:24.580 know that?
00:58:26.080 There's somebody
00:58:26.760 here who knows
00:58:27.500 if the Rolls-Royce
00:58:29.180 plant is
00:58:29.880 insured.
00:58:31.200 How in the
00:58:31.860 world would
00:58:32.220 you know
00:58:32.500 that?
00:58:38.540 Would Scott
00:58:39.260 like a
00:58:39.720 thorium reactor
00:58:40.600 in his
00:58:40.920 backyard, or
00:58:41.920 is he
00:58:42.220 nymphy?
00:58:45.660 I think I
00:58:46.480 would have
00:58:46.700 the same
00:58:47.060 opinion as
00:58:47.840 everybody
00:58:48.120 else.
00:58:49.980 Wouldn't
00:58:50.420 you all
00:58:50.720 have the
00:58:51.020 same
00:58:51.220 opinion?
00:58:53.100 That you'd
00:58:53.840 like it in
00:58:54.280 somebody else's
00:58:54.960 backyard if
00:58:55.740 you have a
00:58:56.080 choice?
00:58:57.460 Is that 1.00
00:58:58.060 dumb? 0.99
00:58:59.180 But it's 1.00
00:59:00.720 also true
00:59:01.340 that I
00:59:02.440 live near a
00:59:03.220 nuclear facility.
00:59:04.800 I do
00:59:05.620 willingly live
00:59:06.380 near a
00:59:06.760 nuclear facility.
00:59:09.020 So what's
00:59:11.120 that do to
00:59:11.480 your argument?
00:59:12.800 I literally
00:59:13.680 live within the
00:59:14.600 blast zone of
00:59:15.240 a nuclear
00:59:15.700 facility.
00:59:18.480 And I
00:59:19.220 chose to.
00:59:20.140 I knew it
00:59:20.620 when I built
00:59:22.520 my house.
00:59:23.400 So I guess I
00:59:24.660 passed that
00:59:25.120 test.
00:59:25.880 I passed the
00:59:26.540 test of being
00:59:27.320 near a nuclear
00:59:28.000 site.
00:59:28.500 and it
00:59:29.880 didn't
00:59:30.460 change any
00:59:31.360 of my
00:59:31.780 actions.
00:59:36.520 Scott, you
00:59:37.240 can still
00:59:37.680 save your
00:59:38.200 soul if I
00:59:39.080 become a
00:59:39.500 Christian.
00:59:42.040 All right.
00:59:49.920 Was the
00:59:50.540 land cheap?
00:59:51.420 thorium reactors.
00:59:59.580 Some people
01:00:00.460 like them.
01:00:03.500 Yeah, it's
01:00:04.220 time to wrap
01:00:04.700 up YouTube.
01:00:07.040 All right,
01:00:07.580 YouTubers. 0.92
01:00:09.020 Thanks for
01:00:09.640 joining, and
01:00:10.740 I will
01:00:11.220 go save my
01:00:15.260 soul.
01:00:15.500 You know,
01:00:16.540 the good
01:00:16.820 news is I
01:00:17.340 don't have
01:00:17.700 one.
01:00:19.540 So there's
01:00:21.660 that.
01:00:23.020 How many of
01:00:23.580 you believe you
01:00:24.200 have a soul?
01:00:31.560 Mostly
01:00:32.000 yeses?
01:00:35.200 A smattering
01:00:36.160 of no.
01:00:38.960 Mostly yes.
01:00:40.180 And do you
01:00:40.920 think you would
01:00:41.420 define a soul the
01:00:42.300 same way?
01:00:42.660 Well, let me
01:00:44.940 ask you this.
01:00:45.660 Does your soul
01:00:46.280 have a memory
01:00:47.020 like a brain
01:00:47.920 does?
01:00:49.280 Does your soul
01:00:49.940 have a memory?
01:00:53.220 No?
01:00:54.880 Yes.
01:00:55.320 So some of
01:00:56.140 you say that
01:00:56.740 your soul
01:00:57.240 has a memory
01:00:58.340 just like a
01:00:59.260 physical brain
01:01:00.020 or a computer
01:01:00.600 does.
01:01:03.380 What is a
01:01:04.120 soul made
01:01:04.580 of enough
01:01:04.920 that it
01:01:05.180 can have a
01:01:05.580 memory?
01:01:07.220 Because I
01:01:07.620 understand how
01:01:08.320 a brain or
01:01:09.160 a computer
01:01:09.660 can have a
01:01:10.240 memory because
01:01:11.380 it's a
01:01:11.740 physical change
01:01:12.600 on a
01:01:12.900 physical object.
01:01:14.580 But a soul
01:01:15.380 has no
01:01:16.000 physicality,
01:01:17.640 so what
01:01:18.040 would be the
01:01:18.700 mechanism for
01:01:19.420 memory
01:01:19.860 production?
01:01:23.440 Yeah, you
01:01:24.080 could be a
01:01:24.500 spiritual being
01:01:25.480 but would
01:01:26.500 your spiritual
01:01:27.060 being have
01:01:27.660 a memory?
01:01:29.140 Because memory
01:01:29.700 is part of
01:01:30.240 the physical
01:01:30.720 world.
01:01:31.320 We don't
01:01:31.780 have a
01:01:33.180 sense of
01:01:33.580 how that
01:01:33.840 could exist
01:01:34.360 in a
01:01:34.800 non-physical
01:01:35.400 world.
01:01:39.760 So is
01:01:42.660 it consistent
01:01:43.880 to believe
01:01:44.500 that your
01:01:45.220 soul is
01:01:47.000 non-physical
01:01:47.940 but that it
01:01:49.120 has memory?
01:01:50.360 Could a
01:01:50.740 non-physical
01:01:51.400 thing have
01:01:51.900 memory?
01:01:55.440 Yes?
01:01:57.920 So a
01:01:58.660 non-physical
01:01:59.320 thing could 0.56
01:01:59.740 have a
01:02:00.020 memory.
01:02:01.080 Even though
01:02:01.820 the way we
01:02:02.380 store memories
01:02:03.100 is on a
01:02:03.880 physical object.
01:02:05.800 How would
01:02:06.360 you store it?
01:02:07.160 What would
01:02:07.480 it be stored
01:02:07.980 in?
01:02:08.340 What would
01:02:08.900 be the
01:02:09.540 soup in
01:02:11.140 which those
01:02:11.660 memories are
01:02:12.320 stored?
01:02:16.100 Spirit
01:02:16.580 bites.
01:02:17.960 It's in
01:02:18.480 the cloud.
01:02:18.920 your soul
01:02:22.560 has a
01:02:22.920 history
01:02:23.280 but does
01:02:25.420 it remember
01:02:25.860 its history?
01:02:27.180 And where
01:02:27.580 would it
01:02:27.900 store that
01:02:28.380 memory?
01:02:31.100 So I
01:02:32.320 guess the
01:02:32.920 part
01:02:33.180 where I
01:02:35.260 say that
01:02:35.740 souls are
01:02:36.600 imaginary
01:02:37.600 well let
01:02:40.840 me put it
01:02:41.200 in a
01:02:41.340 different way.
01:02:42.340 I believe
01:02:42.980 that I
01:02:43.420 have a
01:02:43.960 soul in
01:02:45.060 a physical
01:02:46.040 sense.
01:02:46.560 but it's
01:02:48.720 like a
01:02:49.280 boundary
01:02:49.700 thing where
01:02:50.420 you can see
01:02:50.960 a boundary
01:02:51.440 but a
01:02:51.880 boundary
01:02:52.140 doesn't
01:02:52.560 exist.
01:02:53.640 If you
01:02:54.640 look at
01:02:54.940 the horizon
01:02:55.620 you can
01:02:57.000 point to
01:02:57.440 the horizon
01:02:57.940 and say
01:02:58.340 alright there's
01:02:58.760 the horizon
01:02:59.220 but there's
01:03:00.260 no horizon.
01:03:02.500 You can't
01:03:03.060 grab a
01:03:03.480 handful of
01:03:04.000 horizon.
01:03:05.440 It's a
01:03:06.040 concept.
01:03:06.940 So it
01:03:07.180 could be
01:03:07.600 that your
01:03:08.040 soul is
01:03:08.460 more of
01:03:08.740 a concept
01:03:09.320 and here's
01:03:11.240 a concept
01:03:11.700 that I
01:03:12.280 buy into.
01:03:13.440 that the
01:03:16.500 things you
01:03:16.940 do in
01:03:17.280 your life
01:03:17.840 create a
01:03:19.140 permanent
01:03:19.520 ripple into
01:03:20.300 the future
01:03:20.820 because energy
01:03:22.180 never changes.
01:03:23.420 It's always
01:03:23.940 doing something.
01:03:25.820 So whatever
01:03:26.900 permanent
01:03:27.440 ripples I
01:03:28.160 put on
01:03:28.640 history
01:03:29.560 is my
01:03:30.820 soul.
01:03:31.900 For example
01:03:32.720 I introduced
01:03:34.420 the concept
01:03:34.980 of a
01:03:35.360 talent stack
01:03:36.120 which you
01:03:37.160 see in a
01:03:37.500 lot of
01:03:37.680 other books
01:03:38.160 now and
01:03:38.680 people use
01:03:39.300 it and
01:03:39.520 talk about
01:03:39.940 it.
01:03:41.020 That's my
01:03:41.820 soul.
01:03:42.120 not by
01:03:43.800 itself but
01:03:44.600 the things
01:03:45.500 which I
01:03:45.900 changed
01:03:46.480 during my
01:03:47.440 life will
01:03:48.920 ripple
01:03:49.360 forever.
01:03:50.660 Dilbert will
01:03:52.180 probably be
01:03:52.560 there for a
01:03:53.000 while.
01:03:53.540 Now it
01:03:53.740 might decrease
01:03:54.440 in the sense
01:03:55.300 that you
01:03:55.560 can't recognize
01:03:56.360 the impact.
01:03:57.820 So after
01:03:58.260 a generation
01:03:59.260 or so you
01:04:00.600 might not
01:04:01.000 see any
01:04:01.420 direct thing
01:04:02.060 that I
01:04:02.480 ever left
01:04:02.920 on this
01:04:03.320 earth.
01:04:04.240 But maybe
01:04:04.720 indirectly
01:04:05.360 combined with
01:04:07.380 all the
01:04:07.700 other souls
01:04:08.360 and their
01:04:08.820 impact on
01:04:09.360 everything
01:04:09.680 indirectly I
01:04:11.560 might be
01:04:12.020 some small
01:04:13.100 percentage of
01:04:13.900 what happened
01:04:14.800 in the future
01:04:15.320 and I call
01:04:16.400 that my
01:04:17.760 soul.
01:04:21.260 All right.
01:04:22.780 So that
01:04:23.560 would be an
01:04:24.120 example of
01:04:24.640 how you
01:04:24.900 could have
01:04:25.120 a soul
01:04:25.540 that doesn't
01:04:26.380 need a
01:04:27.320 memory.
01:04:28.500 So the
01:04:29.180 soul that
01:04:29.660 is just
01:04:30.040 the ripple
01:04:30.780 of your
01:04:31.260 life,
01:04:32.180 the things
01:04:33.040 that you
01:04:33.320 did in
01:04:33.680 your life,
01:04:34.420 that doesn't
01:04:34.960 have a
01:04:35.220 memory.
01:04:36.740 It is
01:04:37.300 simply cause
01:04:37.920 and effect.
01:04:38.920 But I
01:04:39.240 would buy
01:04:39.960 into that
01:04:40.400 as being a
01:04:40.900 soul.
01:04:47.200 If I'm
01:04:47.820 an avatar,
01:04:48.600 my soul
01:04:49.100 is actually
01:04:49.720 in my
01:04:50.380 creator's
01:04:51.060 experience,
01:04:52.260 not mine.
01:04:58.800 Yeah.
01:05:00.320 Boy, you
01:05:00.860 know, and
01:05:01.300 I'm seeing a 0.98
01:05:01.980 reference here
01:05:02.660 on YouTube,
01:05:03.440 but I
01:05:04.880 didn't realize
01:05:05.360 at the time
01:05:05.820 how much,
01:05:07.200 how important
01:05:07.860 it was when
01:05:08.660 I was doing
01:05:09.280 two live
01:05:10.200 streams a
01:05:10.680 day during
01:05:11.040 the pandemic,
01:05:12.300 during the
01:05:12.660 lockdowns.
01:05:14.400 People
01:05:14.800 continue to
01:05:15.520 tell me how
01:05:16.020 that was
01:05:17.860 a good
01:05:19.500 mental health
01:05:20.220 process,
01:05:20.840 I guess.
01:05:22.140 Yeah, I'm
01:05:22.440 seeing lots
01:05:22.840 of people
01:05:23.060 say yes
01:05:23.500 to that.
01:05:24.160 Now,
01:05:27.220 well, I'd
01:05:28.700 love to
01:05:29.020 think it
01:05:29.380 saved lives.
01:05:29.980 I don't
01:05:30.240 know.
01:05:32.440 Yeah, I
01:05:32.980 thought it
01:05:33.260 was important.
01:05:34.420 I just
01:05:34.820 didn't realize
01:05:35.340 how important.
01:05:37.000 Just didn't
01:05:37.480 realize it.
01:05:37.960 So I'm
01:05:38.480 glad I
01:05:38.800 did that.
01:05:39.840 And I'm
01:05:40.100 glad that
01:05:40.480 that brought
01:05:40.920 us together.
01:05:42.200 And YouTube,
01:05:43.120 I'm going to
01:05:43.420 say bye for
01:05:44.120 now.
01:05:44.800 Just talk to
01:05:45.740 the locals
01:05:46.240 people a
01:05:46.640 little bit
01:05:46.880 more.
01:05:47.700 And I'll
01:05:48.020 see you
01:05:48.260 tomorrow.
01:05:48.920 Thanks for
01:05:49.320 joining.