Real Coffee with Scott Adams - June 01, 2023


Episode 2126 Scott Adams: Walls Closing In On Trump, Biden & Wray, And Possibly Me, AI Girlfriend


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 5 minutes

Words per Minute

139.17064

Word Count

9,161

Sentence Count

655

Misogynist Sentences

24

Hate Speech Sentences

37


Summary

Coffee with Scott Adams and a special guest, Joe Biden. Plus, a new release of Hunter Biden's laptop pictures, and a new Canada law that makes warnings on cigarettes more prominent on packages. And more.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Do-do-do-do-do-do.
00:00:03.020 Good morning, everybody.
00:00:04.820 Welcome to the highlight of civilization.
00:00:07.460 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams.
00:00:08.920 There's never been a finer time in your life.
00:00:12.140 It's only going to get better from here.
00:00:14.160 But if you'd like to get a little bump of dopamine,
00:00:17.440 possibly a little oxytocin,
00:00:20.480 then all you need is a cup or mug or glass,
00:00:23.600 a tank or chalice or stein,
00:00:24.840 a canteen choker, flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:27.760 Fill it with your favorite liquid I like.
00:00:30.360 Coffee.
00:00:31.280 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure,
00:00:34.620 the dopamine of the day.
00:00:37.200 I was just saying I knew I was forgetting something,
00:00:39.920 and it was my microphone.
00:00:42.380 Sure enough, here we go.
00:00:46.240 I knew something was wrong,
00:00:48.060 and now we're all good, aren't we?
00:00:50.440 Aren't we?
00:00:52.100 Everybody's happy now?
00:00:53.740 All right.
00:00:54.640 How would you like to do the simultaneous sip?
00:00:56.640 It happens now.
00:00:58.880 Go.
00:01:00.000 Ah, delightful.
00:01:08.200 I saw a conversation on Instagram yesterday,
00:01:12.840 and a little real, which means,
00:01:14.740 I don't know if there's any real science behind it,
00:01:16.540 but the claim was this.
00:01:18.600 Have you ever heard this?
00:01:20.260 That the free market and the business world
00:01:23.760 is designed for dopamine feedback,
00:01:27.780 meaning that if you do something well in the free market,
00:01:32.040 you get a raise or some kind of victory,
00:01:34.340 you get a little dopamine hit.
00:01:36.120 That's good.
00:01:36.660 People like dopamine.
00:01:37.980 However, the claim was that men operate on dopamine rewards,
00:01:44.940 and women work on oxytocin rewards,
00:01:49.220 and they're different,
00:01:50.400 which means that if you insert a woman who uses oxytocin as her operating system
00:01:57.140 into a financial system that's dopamine-based,
00:02:01.620 it might not be a perfect fit.
00:02:02.880 Is that interesting?
00:02:05.200 Now, of course, everybody uses both.
00:02:07.400 I mean, we all like dopamine,
00:02:08.840 and we all like oxytocin.
00:02:10.740 But oxytocin is the drug that makes you feel bonded
00:02:14.000 and secure and in love, basically.
00:02:18.260 And dopamine is just the one that you just had a good time.
00:02:21.060 So men are operating on having a good time,
00:02:25.000 and women are operating on trying to get that bonding feeling going,
00:02:28.380 and you can see why we would be confused about each other.
00:02:32.700 We are literally not the same operating system.
00:02:36.500 Some say,
00:02:37.720 well, I saw that there's going to be a new release
00:02:40.320 of Hunter's laptop pictures,
00:02:42.840 and you know what we can't get enough of?
00:02:46.160 I don't know about you,
00:02:47.420 but just today I was thinking,
00:02:48.660 there's only one thing that could really make my life better.
00:02:52.880 I would like to see Hunter Biden's penis from every angle.
00:02:58.600 Am I alone?
00:02:59.600 I don't think I'm alone in that.
00:03:02.360 Yeah, we need to see it from every angle.
00:03:04.360 We need to see close-ups.
00:03:06.380 Yeah, we need to see the whole thing.
00:03:08.580 If you leave out one angle,
00:03:10.060 I'm not even going to know what I'm looking at.
00:03:12.620 So good news for everybody.
00:03:14.080 We'll see lots more dirty Hunter pictures.
00:03:16.240 Meanwhile, in Canada,
00:03:20.460 Canada has decided that it's not good enough
00:03:22.780 to put the warnings on cigarette packages.
00:03:26.060 They're going to start putting the warnings
00:03:27.840 on the cigarettes themselves.
00:03:30.680 So there'll be a little message along the length of the cigarette.
00:03:34.520 So some of the things they're going to say are,
00:03:36.260 like, cigarettes cause cancer, of course.
00:03:38.280 But here's my favorite one.
00:03:40.100 Cigarettes cause impotence.
00:03:41.520 Do you remember when people used to smoke cigarettes
00:03:46.460 because it made them look cool?
00:03:49.840 Well, I can't think of anything less cool
00:03:51.860 than smoking something that says
00:03:53.940 it might cause impotence right on the cigarette.
00:04:01.220 That takes persuasion to the point of cruelty.
00:04:04.800 It's like, wow, that's persuasive.
00:04:08.000 But I think they can take it to another level.
00:04:10.260 What do you think?
00:04:11.580 I think that it's not enough just to print
00:04:14.320 right on the cigarette in Canada,
00:04:16.440 cigarettes cause impotence.
00:04:18.740 I think there should be a law
00:04:21.200 that the cigarette can't be just a tube.
00:04:24.080 You know, right now it's just like a long tube.
00:04:26.740 It needs a couple of balls on the end.
00:04:29.480 So there should be, like, some requirement
00:04:31.280 that your cigarette has balls.
00:04:32.800 So when you put it in your mouth,
00:04:36.840 it might look cool for some segment of society.
00:04:40.180 But for others, maybe it would be one more reason to quit.
00:04:43.360 Who knows?
00:04:44.200 Who knows?
00:04:45.700 Just a thought.
00:04:47.720 So Tara Reid, the woman who famously accused Joe Biden
00:04:51.960 of some sexual stuff that was never proven,
00:04:55.660 she moved to become a citizen of Russia.
00:05:02.640 Now, let me give you a little whistleblower tip.
00:05:07.820 All right?
00:05:08.140 If you make a claim about somebody in our government
00:05:12.840 and then you end up moving to Russia,
00:05:16.280 that does not help your claim.
00:05:19.120 It kind of makes you look like
00:05:20.680 maybe it was Russian all along.
00:05:24.100 Now, I'm not saying it was.
00:05:26.000 I'm just saying it's a bad look
00:05:28.100 when your mysterious accuser
00:05:32.420 suddenly moves to Russia
00:05:34.140 and is fully embraced.
00:05:35.480 Yeah.
00:05:37.760 Yeah, she's afraid for her life in the United States.
00:05:41.580 Okay.
00:05:42.600 I mean, she might be.
00:05:44.120 That could be true.
00:05:45.180 But it's a bad look.
00:05:46.800 Don't move to Russia is what I'm saying.
00:05:49.100 If you're claiming anything
00:05:50.820 that's controversial at all.
00:05:55.760 All right.
00:05:56.540 I told you yesterday, I guess,
00:05:59.080 that there was this new battery technology
00:06:01.680 using a material called vanadium.
00:06:05.480 And apparently, it would be a really big deal
00:06:08.060 if it could be developed further.
00:06:10.700 Now, I didn't know at the time
00:06:12.320 that it's already being refined.
00:06:14.760 So this vanadium stuff is not so much hypothetical.
00:06:18.760 But there are three places where it's being refined,
00:06:21.860 I learned today.
00:06:23.660 Russia, Brazil, and Arkansas.
00:06:27.640 Those are the three places that are big with vanadium.
00:06:30.120 Vanadium is a new material for making batteries
00:06:33.680 that could be way better than the current technology,
00:06:37.300 or at least as good.
00:06:39.100 And that would be a big breakthrough in cost
00:06:41.780 and reliability and all that.
00:06:44.280 Yeah.
00:06:44.520 So apparently, the best refiners of vanadium
00:06:49.100 is in Arkansas.
00:06:51.800 So it could be that Arkansas will become
00:06:56.600 a big battery-making center of the world.
00:07:02.900 Maybe.
00:07:03.700 Because we don't want to depend on Russia or Brazil
00:07:06.440 for our supply.
00:07:07.600 We've certainly learned that.
00:07:10.440 Well, let's put this next story
00:07:13.320 in the category of the most predictable story
00:07:17.740 of all stories.
00:07:20.700 Is anything more predictable
00:07:26.880 than the fact that in the news today,
00:07:29.520 there's a tech developer
00:07:30.720 who's going to clone his girlfriend with chat GPT,
00:07:34.360 and he's making an AI version of her.
00:07:37.540 And apparently, she can even take AI versions
00:07:40.320 of selfies and send to him.
00:07:43.320 So, was that the most predictable story
00:07:48.300 in all of technology?
00:07:50.600 There was no way that wasn't going to happen.
00:07:53.300 So now we have AI that can make an avatar of a person.
00:07:57.560 So obviously, you can make an avatar
00:07:58.900 of your chosen mate.
00:08:02.200 Then you could give that person a voice
00:08:04.360 that mimics the voice of the real person.
00:08:07.760 So obviously, you're going to make an avatar
00:08:09.780 of anybody you want,
00:08:11.160 and they will talk just like that person.
00:08:13.320 And they'll be able to have a conversation.
00:08:15.440 But you can also give it a personality.
00:08:18.040 Because you could give it a body of writing,
00:08:20.520 for example,
00:08:21.620 and say, this is your personality.
00:08:23.420 You know, conform to this.
00:08:25.440 And it'll just be that.
00:08:28.060 So, here's my question.
00:08:30.440 Do you think he programmed it
00:08:32.740 to have all of the, let's say,
00:08:35.340 the less positive characteristics of his girlfriend?
00:08:38.780 Or did he just put in the good ones?
00:08:42.100 For example,
00:08:43.700 will his AI complain about him
00:08:45.940 not doing enough?
00:08:48.960 Do you think the AI will complain?
00:08:50.720 Will the AI start a fight with him
00:08:53.380 just to get attention?
00:08:56.260 Just to test him?
00:08:58.040 Will the AI do that?
00:08:59.940 Will the AI be really angry at him
00:09:02.920 for no reason whatsoever?
00:09:04.100 Well, I don't know.
00:09:08.360 And so, here's the funny part.
00:09:11.400 This guy is creating a competitor
00:09:13.420 for his girlfriend
00:09:14.540 that is a copy of his girlfriend
00:09:18.620 minus all the fucked up parts.
00:09:21.160 How is she going to compete with that?
00:09:27.660 You know,
00:09:28.500 anybody who's ever been in a relationship
00:09:30.600 knows that it's no more than half good.
00:09:34.580 Right?
00:09:35.040 Like, after a while.
00:09:36.420 After a while,
00:09:37.020 it's no more than 50% good.
00:09:39.080 And then it's 50%, you know,
00:09:40.640 terror and awfulness.
00:09:42.660 What if he takes the 50% awful part
00:09:45.400 out of the clone?
00:09:47.520 How is the real one
00:09:48.320 going to compete with that?
00:09:49.300 I mean that literally.
00:09:52.460 How could a real woman
00:09:53.520 compete with that?
00:09:57.000 Now, when I say it,
00:09:58.060 I'm sure that everybody laughs, right?
00:10:00.940 When I say,
00:10:01.920 how can a real woman compete
00:10:03.340 with her own clone
00:10:04.320 that removes her bad parts?
00:10:07.340 You kind of think
00:10:08.240 that's just funny, right?
00:10:10.040 Oh, that's just like
00:10:10.880 an amusing, comedic,
00:10:13.300 you know, observation.
00:10:16.580 It's not.
00:10:17.260 It is not a comedic observation.
00:10:20.900 It might be the biggest problem
00:10:22.500 in the world.
00:10:24.640 Because it's going to make
00:10:25.780 reproduction look like a bad deal.
00:10:29.620 It really is.
00:10:31.080 It really, genuinely,
00:10:32.860 is going to make reproduction
00:10:34.100 kind of a challenge.
00:10:35.800 And relationships
00:10:37.020 and everything else.
00:10:37.900 I once had an idea
00:10:42.020 of producing
00:10:43.160 what I would call
00:10:44.760 G-rated pornography
00:10:48.160 for men.
00:10:50.900 G-rated pornography
00:10:52.720 for men.
00:10:54.480 And it would feature
00:10:55.340 a man coming home
00:10:56.640 from a hard day of work
00:10:57.760 and his wife
00:10:59.680 being really nice to him.
00:11:01.920 That would be the whole show.
00:11:03.220 That's it.
00:11:08.220 She just really cares
00:11:09.440 about him
00:11:09.940 and asks him
00:11:11.400 how she can make him happy
00:11:12.520 and maybe brings him
00:11:14.720 his favorite beverage.
00:11:16.320 Gives a little back rub.
00:11:18.380 Says she really appreciates
00:11:20.000 all he does for her.
00:11:21.420 And that's it.
00:11:22.160 That's the little show.
00:11:24.280 No plot.
00:11:25.740 So the reason I call it porn
00:11:27.800 is that you wouldn't be
00:11:29.520 watching it for the story.
00:11:30.880 You know, you don't really care
00:11:33.020 about their whole life.
00:11:33.860 You're just like,
00:11:34.480 ooh, I'd like to see
00:11:35.480 what would that look like
00:11:37.000 to have a man
00:11:38.600 who's just like treated
00:11:39.540 as a, you know,
00:11:41.280 as a valued part
00:11:42.320 of the household and stuff.
00:11:43.980 That'd be cool.
00:11:45.460 Yeah, sort of 50s style.
00:11:46.680 Exactly.
00:11:47.820 Now, I believe in modern lingo
00:11:50.480 that would be called
00:11:51.620 a trad wife.
00:11:53.300 Have you heard that term?
00:11:54.900 T-R-A-D.
00:11:56.340 Short for traditional
00:11:57.760 as in 50s kind of,
00:12:00.500 you know,
00:12:00.980 man is the head
00:12:01.560 of the household,
00:12:02.940 woman does the cooking
00:12:04.200 sort of thing.
00:12:07.860 Trad is everything
00:12:08.780 is what I'm going for.
00:12:10.840 Well, there you go.
00:12:13.840 Well, so maybe
00:12:14.900 that'll happen someday.
00:12:17.780 I saw a story
00:12:19.100 that at the close
00:12:20.260 of the market yesterday,
00:12:22.300 someone unknown
00:12:23.260 sold 33 million shares
00:12:25.160 of Apple at the close.
00:12:27.240 and that's
00:12:28.580 $5.8 billion worth.
00:12:32.400 $5.8 billion.
00:12:35.020 Now, here's what
00:12:36.660 here's what I wondered.
00:12:39.000 I wondered if
00:12:40.120 whoever did that selling
00:12:41.220 had the same experience
00:12:42.220 I did.
00:12:43.740 Because the reason
00:12:44.840 I sold my Apple stock,
00:12:46.480 so I don't own any,
00:12:47.540 and by the way,
00:12:48.060 I'm not recommending this.
00:12:49.620 I'm not recommending it.
00:12:51.580 I'm just describing, right?
00:12:53.340 Do not do what I do
00:12:54.580 financially.
00:12:55.180 It is not a good idea.
00:12:57.440 Trust me,
00:12:57.840 it's not a good idea.
00:12:59.640 But the reason
00:13:00.840 that I got rid
00:13:01.540 of my Apple stock
00:13:02.440 is that I'd spend
00:13:03.960 a week or two
00:13:04.920 playing with AI,
00:13:06.720 and then I tried
00:13:08.040 to use my
00:13:08.860 Apple S-I-R-I,
00:13:11.860 I don't want to trigger them,
00:13:13.580 to do anything.
00:13:15.480 And as soon as you use
00:13:16.640 the Apple version
00:13:17.520 of that little thing
00:13:19.080 you talk to,
00:13:20.200 and you compare that
00:13:21.480 to any AI,
00:13:22.500 it looks like
00:13:24.700 they just gave up.
00:13:26.400 I can't imagine
00:13:27.460 a world in which
00:13:28.380 Steve Jobs
00:13:29.620 is behind
00:13:30.480 on this technology.
00:13:33.600 Can you imagine
00:13:34.140 Apple being behind
00:13:35.520 on this?
00:13:37.580 Like, way behind.
00:13:38.860 Way, way behind.
00:13:39.720 I mean, because
00:13:40.160 Siri doesn't even look
00:13:41.940 like a real product
00:13:43.360 in 2023.
00:13:45.300 It looks like a joke.
00:13:48.280 Well, we'll see.
00:13:49.820 We'll see if Apple
00:13:51.220 can pull it out.
00:13:52.300 If you had to bet,
00:13:53.580 don't bet my way,
00:13:55.400 I think the safer bet
00:13:57.100 is that Apple
00:13:58.340 will do something
00:13:59.200 really big with AI.
00:14:01.440 They'll just wait
00:14:02.200 and try to get it right.
00:14:04.060 But at the moment,
00:14:05.940 they really look like
00:14:07.100 they're not
00:14:07.560 a current technology.
00:14:09.920 And my biggest fear
00:14:11.320 is that the entire
00:14:12.960 app store concept
00:14:15.400 of the iPhone,
00:14:16.820 the entire ecosystem,
00:14:18.300 doesn't make sense
00:14:19.240 if you could just
00:14:20.460 have an operating
00:14:21.080 system that's AI
00:14:22.080 and it does
00:14:23.700 all of those things.
00:14:25.540 So if you need
00:14:26.400 a date,
00:14:27.380 your AI figures
00:14:28.380 out how to do it.
00:14:30.080 You don't need
00:14:30.800 a dating app.
00:14:31.880 If you need
00:14:32.420 to do some math,
00:14:33.320 you don't need
00:14:33.680 a spreadsheet.
00:14:35.120 Just tell the AI
00:14:36.860 what you want
00:14:37.420 and it'll produce
00:14:37.980 it for you.
00:14:39.680 So I think
00:14:40.600 we're approaching
00:14:41.860 the point where
00:14:42.780 the only interface
00:14:44.520 is you talking
00:14:45.460 to an intelligent
00:14:46.620 entity.
00:14:50.320 Your AI wife
00:14:52.020 will sing
00:14:52.480 the theme song
00:14:53.440 for Miami Vice.
00:14:55.800 That's very specific.
00:14:58.020 Good comment there.
00:15:02.120 All right.
00:15:03.620 Mike M. says,
00:15:04.920 trad wives
00:15:05.640 all day long.
00:15:07.120 Men,
00:15:07.620 how many of you
00:15:08.400 wish you had
00:15:09.120 a trad wife?
00:15:10.620 Or maybe you do.
00:15:11.680 If you have one,
00:15:12.420 you can just say
00:15:12.920 you want one.
00:15:13.440 with all the yeses.
00:15:18.940 It's like a wall
00:15:20.040 of yes.
00:15:23.100 You had one,
00:15:24.220 got one,
00:15:24.900 yes.
00:15:26.240 And you're happier
00:15:27.200 because of it,
00:15:27.880 right?
00:15:28.660 Are you happier
00:15:29.340 because you have
00:15:29.880 a trad wife?
00:15:33.760 Is there anybody
00:15:34.640 who wishes
00:15:35.280 that they had
00:15:36.460 more of a
00:15:37.200 feminist,
00:15:38.700 independent
00:15:39.180 partner?
00:15:40.460 No.
00:15:43.440 PJ says,
00:15:47.420 why are men
00:15:48.000 scared of real
00:15:48.820 women?
00:15:49.780 Is that what's
00:15:50.480 going on?
00:15:52.020 Is that what
00:15:52.580 you saw?
00:15:53.160 Did you see
00:15:53.840 men were afraid
00:15:55.180 of real women?
00:15:56.580 That's what
00:15:57.140 you're picking up
00:15:57.740 from this
00:15:58.080 conversation?
00:16:01.040 I don't think
00:16:01.780 that's exactly
00:16:02.420 what's going on.
00:16:03.740 Not exactly.
00:16:07.600 Well,
00:16:08.080 maybe it's just
00:16:08.680 going to be
00:16:09.040 some reversion
00:16:10.740 to the meme
00:16:11.340 going on.
00:16:11.940 You know,
00:16:14.140 what's interesting
00:16:14.720 is,
00:16:16.180 here's a
00:16:17.260 hypothesis
00:16:18.100 that's brand
00:16:19.100 new,
00:16:19.360 I'm just
00:16:19.640 making it up
00:16:20.260 on the fly.
00:16:21.840 Would you
00:16:22.260 say that
00:16:22.800 men,
00:16:23.860 as a strategy,
00:16:25.500 try to figure
00:16:26.200 out what it
00:16:26.740 is that women
00:16:27.280 want,
00:16:28.560 and then they
00:16:29.060 try pretty hard
00:16:29.760 to give it to
00:16:30.280 them?
00:16:31.060 Would you
00:16:31.540 say that's
00:16:31.900 true?
00:16:33.280 Men try to
00:16:34.000 figure out what
00:16:34.540 women want,
00:16:35.180 and they try
00:16:35.500 to give it to
00:16:35.900 them.
00:16:36.040 Now,
00:16:36.320 where it all
00:16:37.100 goes off the
00:16:37.680 rails is that
00:16:39.360 women lie about
00:16:40.240 what they want.
00:16:41.940 So you can
00:16:43.000 never get it
00:16:43.480 right.
00:16:44.100 Or they
00:16:44.620 can't be
00:16:45.040 pleased.
00:16:45.720 Some would
00:16:46.100 say there's
00:16:46.520 nothing that
00:16:46.940 makes them
00:16:47.240 happy.
00:16:48.280 So it's
00:16:48.940 basically,
00:16:49.620 you end up
00:16:50.860 being like a
00:16:51.460 gerbil on a
00:16:52.400 treadmill.
00:16:53.880 I can make
00:16:54.540 you happy
00:16:54.900 today.
00:16:55.780 If only I'll
00:16:56.420 do a little
00:16:56.780 bit more.
00:16:57.580 All right,
00:16:57.840 that wasn't
00:16:58.280 enough.
00:16:59.120 But I think
00:16:59.640 I can make
00:17:00.080 you happy
00:17:00.420 today.
00:17:01.700 Yesterday was
00:17:02.400 a loser.
00:17:03.300 I did
00:17:03.560 everything I
00:17:04.060 could,
00:17:04.320 but it
00:17:04.520 didn't work
00:17:04.860 out.
00:17:05.460 But today,
00:17:06.360 I'm just
00:17:06.900 going to work
00:17:07.320 through your
00:17:07.680 list of things
00:17:08.220 you want me
00:17:08.620 to do.
00:17:09.260 I'm going to
00:17:09.640 put that shirt
00:17:10.280 on you want
00:17:11.940 what you
00:17:12.180 want me
00:17:12.500 to do.
00:17:13.860 It won't
00:17:14.400 work out.
00:17:15.360 It won't
00:17:15.680 work out.
00:17:18.280 But do
00:17:18.960 women do
00:17:19.380 the same
00:17:19.700 thing?
00:17:21.300 Aside from
00:17:22.180 looking good,
00:17:24.140 which of
00:17:24.660 course women
00:17:25.060 do put
00:17:25.720 effort into
00:17:26.220 looking good
00:17:26.900 for men,
00:17:27.660 do they
00:17:28.140 also put
00:17:28.900 effort into
00:17:29.500 doing whatever
00:17:30.600 would make
00:17:31.100 men happy
00:17:31.760 as best they
00:17:32.960 understand it?
00:17:34.680 Is that a
00:17:35.440 thing?
00:17:37.060 We see some
00:17:37.900 yeses.
00:17:38.760 We see some
00:17:39.320 yeses.
00:17:40.080 But I think
00:17:40.500 that's the
00:17:40.920 trad wife
00:17:41.480 talking.
00:17:41.940 Maybe the
00:17:43.920 trad wives
00:17:44.480 do.
00:17:45.540 Maybe that's
00:17:46.080 the difference.
00:17:50.160 All right.
00:17:52.140 Narcissistic
00:17:52.660 abuse to
00:17:53.360 put a man
00:17:53.860 on a
00:17:54.140 treadmill and
00:17:55.380 never give
00:17:56.220 him any
00:17:56.640 positive
00:17:57.180 reinforcement?
00:17:58.220 It does
00:17:58.780 seem like
00:17:59.160 narcissistic
00:17:59.880 abuse.
00:18:01.320 You try
00:18:01.800 very hard
00:18:02.240 to please
00:18:02.760 your husband.
00:18:05.760 Well,
00:18:07.720 let me
00:18:08.540 speak for a
00:18:09.460 moment to
00:18:11.000 the viewer
00:18:11.500 who said,
00:18:12.040 I try
00:18:12.260 very hard
00:18:12.680 to please
00:18:13.140 my husband.
00:18:15.040 I would
00:18:15.920 like to
00:18:16.460 put a
00:18:17.840 little color
00:18:18.580 on that
00:18:19.040 comment.
00:18:20.520 You try
00:18:21.200 very hard
00:18:21.620 to please
00:18:22.060 your husband.
00:18:24.420 So let's
00:18:25.440 see, what
00:18:25.860 would be
00:18:26.400 included in
00:18:27.080 that?
00:18:27.480 Would,
00:18:28.380 let's say,
00:18:29.840 doing shopping
00:18:30.620 for his
00:18:31.140 clothes,
00:18:32.080 maybe buying
00:18:32.620 him a new
00:18:32.980 shirt that
00:18:34.380 he didn't
00:18:34.660 ask for,
00:18:35.600 would that be
00:18:36.360 part of
00:18:36.660 it?
00:18:37.800 Buying
00:18:38.240 things for
00:18:38.760 him?
00:18:40.420 With his
00:18:41.060 money?
00:18:41.920 Or with
00:18:42.580 your shared
00:18:42.980 money, I
00:18:43.380 guess.
00:18:45.540 Yeah.
00:18:48.940 Yeah, but
00:18:49.560 the problem
00:18:50.000 is, I don't
00:18:50.660 know if
00:18:50.980 women understand
00:18:52.480 what men
00:18:53.420 need.
00:18:54.560 We just
00:18:55.220 need a
00:18:55.560 sandwich and
00:18:56.020 a blowjob.
00:18:57.700 Am I
00:18:58.280 right, men?
00:19:00.720 Because a
00:19:01.400 sandwich and a
00:19:02.000 blowjob are
00:19:02.700 both appreciation.
00:19:03.640 They're
00:19:05.220 basically
00:19:05.740 physical
00:19:06.420 manifestations
00:19:07.140 of appreciation.
00:19:08.480 And we
00:19:08.900 work for
00:19:09.340 appreciation.
00:19:10.720 We're just
00:19:11.140 appreciation
00:19:11.740 animals.
00:19:12.960 Oh, okay,
00:19:14.000 as long as
00:19:14.420 you appreciate
00:19:14.860 it, I'll
00:19:15.240 do that.
00:19:16.260 Would you
00:19:16.700 bang your
00:19:17.200 head against
00:19:17.600 this wall?
00:19:18.860 Would you
00:19:19.280 appreciate it?
00:19:20.300 Yes, I
00:19:20.740 would.
00:19:21.480 Okay, I'll
00:19:22.480 bang my
00:19:22.820 head against
00:19:23.160 the wall.
00:19:24.000 I just need
00:19:24.580 that appreciation.
00:19:25.480 That's all
00:19:25.780 I'm working
00:19:26.080 for.
00:19:27.820 So sandwich
00:19:28.800 and a
00:19:29.100 blowjob is
00:19:29.720 really just
00:19:30.200 the physical
00:19:30.740 version of
00:19:31.380 the appreciation.
00:19:33.640 All right,
00:19:34.180 well, if
00:19:34.420 you understand
00:19:34.880 what men
00:19:35.260 want, then
00:19:35.840 trying to
00:19:36.300 please them
00:19:36.900 seems like
00:19:37.540 it'd be
00:19:37.780 crazy.
00:19:40.200 More examples
00:19:41.100 of poorly
00:19:41.760 run California,
00:19:43.060 my state that
00:19:43.760 is total
00:19:44.800 garbage.
00:19:46.260 So some
00:19:47.060 insurers are
00:19:47.780 pulling out of
00:19:48.300 the state,
00:19:49.280 and I didn't
00:19:50.380 know the
00:19:50.700 details of
00:19:51.340 why.
00:19:52.420 This is
00:19:53.060 going to
00:19:53.280 make your
00:19:53.620 head explode.
00:19:55.560 This is
00:19:56.200 why State
00:19:56.800 Farm and
00:19:57.620 some others
00:19:58.180 don't want
00:19:59.160 to offer
00:19:59.840 insurance,
00:20:00.800 home insurance,
00:20:01.740 in California.
00:20:03.640 California is
00:20:04.700 the only
00:20:05.060 state, I
00:20:05.740 saw this in
00:20:06.200 the Wall
00:20:06.440 Street Journal,
00:20:07.400 California is
00:20:08.060 the only
00:20:08.380 state that
00:20:09.720 forces insurers
00:20:10.840 to base
00:20:12.100 their rates
00:20:12.800 on the
00:20:14.060 past.
00:20:16.800 It's the
00:20:17.480 only state.
00:20:19.000 And do you
00:20:19.420 know what's
00:20:19.660 wrong with
00:20:20.040 the past?
00:20:21.360 It does
00:20:22.120 not describe
00:20:22.820 the future.
00:20:25.120 Right.
00:20:25.660 So in
00:20:26.140 California,
00:20:27.060 our forests
00:20:27.860 are getting
00:20:28.260 drier and
00:20:29.180 less managed,
00:20:30.620 so things
00:20:31.600 are much
00:20:32.060 more dangerous
00:20:32.720 in terms of
00:20:33.320 fire than
00:20:34.360 they ever
00:20:34.720 have been
00:20:35.080 before.
00:20:36.220 Now,
00:20:36.660 insurance
00:20:37.040 companies are
00:20:37.660 fine with
00:20:38.040 that,
00:20:38.760 normally.
00:20:39.860 They just
00:20:40.280 say,
00:20:40.580 well,
00:20:40.760 you live
00:20:41.160 in a
00:20:41.680 combustible
00:20:42.580 state,
00:20:43.520 we'll charge
00:20:44.160 you a lot
00:20:44.620 for that,
00:20:45.680 and you'll
00:20:46.520 have insurance
00:20:47.080 and we'll
00:20:47.400 make money
00:20:47.900 and you'll
00:20:48.620 pay too
00:20:48.940 much for
00:20:49.340 it,
00:20:49.460 but that's
00:20:49.740 not our
00:20:50.100 fault.
00:20:51.320 And then
00:20:51.600 everybody
00:20:51.900 have insurance.
00:20:53.220 But in
00:20:53.580 California,
00:20:54.220 you have to
00:20:54.580 set the
00:20:54.960 rate based
00:20:55.540 on what
00:20:55.900 the forest
00:20:56.400 fire
00:20:56.680 situation
00:20:57.400 used to
00:20:59.040 be.
00:21:00.300 Just think
00:21:00.900 about that.
00:21:01.380 We've
00:21:02.720 clearly
00:21:03.060 entered a
00:21:03.860 period where
00:21:04.600 because of
00:21:06.500 climate or
00:21:07.140 forest management
00:21:08.080 or whatever
00:21:08.600 it is,
00:21:09.480 the risk of
00:21:10.340 a fire in
00:21:11.140 California is
00:21:11.800 way higher
00:21:12.600 next year
00:21:13.900 than the
00:21:15.760 average of
00:21:16.260 any year in
00:21:16.700 the past.
00:21:17.220 And the
00:21:17.420 insurance company
00:21:18.100 can't set the
00:21:18.700 rates based on
00:21:19.320 that.
00:21:22.800 How much
00:21:24.420 worse could
00:21:25.220 you run
00:21:25.680 a state?
00:21:26.920 It's the
00:21:27.420 only one.
00:21:27.960 all of the
00:21:28.960 other states
00:21:29.460 don't have
00:21:29.860 this problem
00:21:30.420 just because
00:21:31.440 they're not
00:21:31.840 incompetent.
00:21:32.820 They let the
00:21:33.520 free market
00:21:34.000 do what the
00:21:34.480 free market
00:21:34.900 wants to
00:21:35.380 do.
00:21:36.560 How hard
00:21:37.240 is that?
00:21:39.100 I mean,
00:21:39.760 all the
00:21:40.180 other states
00:21:40.700 got it
00:21:41.120 right.
00:21:42.100 All the
00:21:42.720 other states
00:21:43.380 in California
00:21:44.660 can't figure
00:21:45.200 it out.
00:21:45.960 So we don't
00:21:46.680 get insurance.
00:21:47.840 Our houses
00:21:48.220 just burn
00:21:48.680 up.
00:21:50.860 Insane.
00:21:51.820 Speaking of
00:21:52.380 California and
00:21:53.240 Oakland,
00:21:54.800 which you
00:21:55.320 might know
00:21:55.880 is one of
00:21:57.620 the more
00:21:57.880 dangerous
00:21:58.280 places to
00:21:58.960 go.
00:21:59.480 I certainly
00:21:59.940 would never
00:22:00.380 step foot in
00:22:01.280 Oakland.
00:22:02.480 I've been
00:22:03.040 invited to
00:22:03.620 Oakland a few
00:22:04.160 times in the
00:22:04.740 past few
00:22:06.120 years.
00:22:07.100 And I always
00:22:07.560 just laugh.
00:22:09.080 I go,
00:22:09.480 seriously?
00:22:11.060 You think
00:22:11.680 there's any
00:22:12.160 reason that
00:22:12.680 would get me
00:22:13.020 to Oakland?
00:22:14.780 There's nothing.
00:22:16.200 There isn't
00:22:16.700 anything.
00:22:17.020 You could give
00:22:17.360 me the Nobel
00:22:17.960 fucking prize in
00:22:19.000 Oakland, and
00:22:19.900 I'd say mail
00:22:20.520 it to me.
00:22:21.640 I'm not going
00:22:22.080 to step foot
00:22:22.800 in Oakland.
00:22:24.080 That's just
00:22:24.480 not going to
00:22:24.880 happen.
00:22:25.960 So there was
00:22:26.760 a video of
00:22:27.420 a meeting
00:22:27.780 in which
00:22:28.160 the citizens
00:22:28.860 were outraged
00:22:30.540 about all
00:22:31.040 the crime,
00:22:31.680 especially the
00:22:32.280 violent stuff
00:22:32.980 and the
00:22:33.320 physical stuff.
00:22:34.820 And there
00:22:35.260 was a big
00:22:35.620 crowd of
00:22:36.420 people who
00:22:36.980 had joined
00:22:37.880 to say
00:22:39.040 that the
00:22:39.760 lack of
00:22:40.200 policing had
00:22:40.760 gone too
00:22:41.140 far.
00:22:42.140 And the
00:22:42.900 woman who
00:22:43.320 was talking
00:22:43.800 asked a
00:22:44.580 show of
00:22:44.960 hands how
00:22:46.200 many of
00:22:46.560 them had
00:22:46.860 been assaulted,
00:22:48.760 just physically
00:22:49.440 assaulted.
00:22:51.580 And an
00:22:52.940 alarming number
00:22:53.640 of people
00:22:53.980 raised their
00:22:54.480 hands,
00:22:55.300 physically
00:22:55.820 assaulted.
00:22:56.760 I'm not
00:22:57.420 talking about
00:22:57.820 a property
00:22:58.340 crime.
00:22:59.460 Just their
00:22:59.900 body was
00:23:00.880 physically
00:23:01.420 assaulted
00:23:01.900 somewhere in
00:23:02.560 the street.
00:23:03.660 And it's
00:23:03.900 like everybody
00:23:04.420 was raising
00:23:04.800 their hand.
00:23:06.880 How often
00:23:07.700 do you get
00:23:08.080 assaulted just
00:23:08.760 walking down
00:23:09.320 the street in
00:23:09.960 Oakland?
00:23:10.800 Looks like
00:23:11.440 it's a daily
00:23:12.000 occurrence.
00:23:14.200 Anyway, so
00:23:15.120 that's another
00:23:16.100 poor California
00:23:17.200 management.
00:23:19.220 Another topic,
00:23:20.420 I'm going to
00:23:21.600 talk about this
00:23:22.180 because it rhymes.
00:23:23.780 Did you know
00:23:24.240 that America
00:23:24.720 has a
00:23:25.100 birth
00:23:25.340 dearth?
00:23:26.640 Yeah,
00:23:27.300 there's a
00:23:27.680 dearth of
00:23:28.000 births.
00:23:29.320 So the
00:23:29.780 birth
00:23:29.980 dearth,
00:23:30.660 which is
00:23:31.040 really the
00:23:31.380 only reason
00:23:31.720 I'm talking
00:23:32.100 about this
00:23:32.480 story, is
00:23:32.880 so I can
00:23:33.200 say birth
00:23:33.600 dearth.
00:23:34.920 Now you're
00:23:35.500 going to
00:23:35.680 say it at
00:23:36.040 home.
00:23:37.080 You have
00:23:37.440 to.
00:23:37.880 Say it.
00:23:39.260 Say it.
00:23:40.520 On your
00:23:41.040 own, everybody,
00:23:42.180 you have to
00:23:42.580 say it.
00:23:42.960 Birth
00:23:43.140 dearth.
00:23:43.940 It's just
00:23:44.320 too fun not
00:23:44.840 to say.
00:23:46.300 You can feel
00:23:47.060 it, right?
00:23:48.100 As soon as I
00:23:48.660 said it, you
00:23:49.140 said to
00:23:49.400 yourself, I
00:23:49.780 have to say
00:23:50.220 that.
00:23:51.440 Birth
00:23:51.640 dearth, and
00:23:52.920 then you
00:23:53.160 felt okay.
00:23:54.720 Well, so
00:23:57.280 here's what
00:23:59.380 makes me
00:23:59.820 think we
00:24:00.240 live in a
00:24:00.720 simulation.
00:24:02.820 How do
00:24:03.440 you explain
00:24:03.920 the fact
00:24:04.460 that the
00:24:05.720 human population
00:24:07.140 is stalling
00:24:08.240 and starting
00:24:08.720 to decrease
00:24:09.580 at exactly
00:24:11.340 the time
00:24:12.040 the AI
00:24:12.960 is going
00:24:13.400 to take
00:24:13.780 jobs?
00:24:16.240 Does that
00:24:16.880 feel like a
00:24:17.780 little bit
00:24:18.140 too on the
00:24:18.620 nose?
00:24:18.940 Like, how
00:24:21.400 could those
00:24:21.840 two things
00:24:22.340 happen at
00:24:22.760 the same
00:24:23.080 time?
00:24:24.800 That the
00:24:25.280 exact answer
00:24:26.600 to AI
00:24:28.520 taking all
00:24:29.160 our jobs
00:24:29.740 is fewer
00:24:30.280 people, right?
00:24:32.860 Now, what's
00:24:33.620 our other
00:24:33.980 biggest problem
00:24:34.760 when you say
00:24:36.540 inflation?
00:24:38.320 Inflation is
00:24:39.060 a terrible
00:24:39.400 problem.
00:24:40.260 Do you
00:24:40.460 know what
00:24:40.760 is the
00:24:41.040 best solution
00:24:41.600 to inflation?
00:24:43.420 An
00:24:43.980 improvement
00:24:44.380 in productivity
00:24:45.360 so that one
00:24:46.840 person can
00:24:47.420 make more
00:24:48.040 stuff,
00:24:48.940 then that
00:24:49.740 stuff will
00:24:50.360 be less
00:24:51.180 cost per
00:24:51.780 unit because
00:24:52.640 it's made
00:24:53.080 more cheaply,
00:24:54.300 and then people
00:24:55.040 pay less for
00:24:55.660 stuff, and
00:24:56.040 that's the
00:24:56.800 answer to
00:24:57.460 inflation.
00:24:59.300 So it's
00:25:00.020 kind of weird
00:25:00.640 that all
00:25:02.640 of our
00:25:03.000 problems,
00:25:03.960 the big
00:25:04.380 ones, I
00:25:05.060 would argue
00:25:05.720 that climate
00:25:06.360 is also
00:25:07.720 something that
00:25:08.300 will be
00:25:09.220 solved by
00:25:09.700 AI.
00:25:10.840 For example,
00:25:12.300 if you
00:25:12.660 wanted to
00:25:13.140 have a
00:25:13.700 proper fusion
00:25:14.740 reactor,
00:25:15.740 which would
00:25:16.220 certainly get
00:25:17.260 you closer to
00:25:17.960 solving all
00:25:18.560 the climate
00:25:18.940 issues, if
00:25:19.880 there are
00:25:20.140 any, you
00:25:22.740 need AI to
00:25:24.380 keep your
00:25:24.820 fusion reactor
00:25:25.900 optimized.
00:25:27.420 So there's
00:25:27.980 a whole bunch
00:25:28.340 of places
00:25:28.700 where AI will
00:25:29.620 probably figure
00:25:30.220 out better
00:25:30.920 battery technology
00:25:32.000 and a bunch
00:25:33.080 of stuff like
00:25:33.600 that.
00:25:34.800 So it's
00:25:35.980 kind of weird
00:25:36.460 that AI is
00:25:37.300 coming along
00:25:37.860 at exactly
00:25:38.540 the time when
00:25:40.180 it's sort of
00:25:40.660 the only thing
00:25:41.360 that would solve
00:25:41.900 our other
00:25:42.420 biggest problems.
00:25:43.280 isn't that
00:25:45.660 weird?
00:25:46.380 Everything
00:25:46.700 from climate
00:25:48.280 and energy
00:25:48.940 to too
00:25:51.060 many people
00:25:51.920 old, not
00:25:52.660 enough young
00:25:53.140 workers,
00:25:53.860 inflation,
00:25:55.980 even loneliness.
00:25:57.920 What about
00:25:58.220 loneliness?
00:25:59.740 What about
00:26:00.100 health care?
00:26:01.780 These are all
00:26:02.340 things that AI
00:26:03.000 is going to
00:26:03.440 be insanely
00:26:04.580 useful for
00:26:07.640 mitigating those
00:26:08.660 problems.
00:26:10.500 I don't know,
00:26:10.880 it's such a
00:26:11.660 weird coincidence
00:26:12.300 that you could
00:26:12.980 have 14
00:26:13.920 billion years
00:26:14.700 of this
00:26:16.180 universe,
00:26:17.760 and then
00:26:18.020 in this little
00:26:19.000 slice of time
00:26:19.940 that those
00:26:21.280 things all
00:26:21.760 happen at the
00:26:22.340 same time.
00:26:23.740 Now, it
00:26:24.220 could be it's
00:26:25.020 just a symptom
00:26:26.340 of an advanced
00:26:27.420 civilization.
00:26:28.900 So maybe it's
00:26:29.460 not a coincidence,
00:26:30.700 but I'm glad
00:26:31.580 it's happening.
00:26:34.460 All right.
00:26:37.560 Breitbart
00:26:38.160 was reporting
00:26:38.920 that,
00:26:40.100 according to
00:26:40.720 polls,
00:26:41.300 Trump beats
00:26:42.000 DeSantis on
00:26:43.080 essentially every
00:26:44.480 important policy
00:26:45.820 issue.
00:26:47.400 It's not even
00:26:48.380 close.
00:26:50.720 Now, this
00:26:51.840 unfortunately
00:26:52.520 plays very much
00:26:54.300 into the
00:26:55.180 DeSantis is the
00:26:56.740 tribute band.
00:26:57.740 Yeah, it's the
00:26:58.340 tribute band.
00:26:59.560 That's the
00:27:00.140 problem.
00:27:01.700 Most situations,
00:27:03.420 let's take a
00:27:04.300 more classic
00:27:05.500 example.
00:27:06.680 Let's take
00:27:07.400 Joe Biden
00:27:08.480 Biden versus
00:27:09.400 RFK Jr.
00:27:12.760 RFK Jr.
00:27:13.560 is not the
00:27:14.360 weak version
00:27:15.140 of Joe Biden
00:27:15.900 or vice
00:27:17.160 versa.
00:27:18.260 It's not like
00:27:19.060 one is just
00:27:19.720 a little better
00:27:20.520 than the other.
00:27:21.080 They have
00:27:22.640 different ideas.
00:27:24.600 The things that
00:27:25.260 RFK Jr.
00:27:26.080 would do are
00:27:26.700 very much not
00:27:27.500 the things that
00:27:28.280 Joe Biden
00:27:29.000 would do.
00:27:29.980 So if you're
00:27:30.680 looking at those
00:27:31.240 two, that's a
00:27:32.320 real choice,
00:27:33.700 wouldn't you say?
00:27:34.360 If you say,
00:27:35.640 oh, I like a
00:27:36.220 little bit more
00:27:36.720 of these Biden
00:27:37.340 opinions than
00:27:39.220 these RFK Jr.
00:27:40.400 opinions, that's
00:27:41.920 a real choice.
00:27:43.980 But if you look
00:27:44.900 at Trump and
00:27:46.440 DeSantis, the
00:27:47.940 only thing that's
00:27:49.000 different, because
00:27:50.980 their policies are
00:27:51.840 largely the same,
00:27:53.600 at least the
00:27:54.160 ones they're
00:27:54.720 serious about,
00:27:55.520 right?
00:27:55.820 They're largely
00:27:56.340 the same.
00:27:59.040 I don't know
00:27:59.900 how DeSantis
00:28:01.620 can make an
00:28:02.240 argument except
00:28:02.980 that he would
00:28:04.160 attract less
00:28:05.160 negative attention.
00:28:07.620 But what's
00:28:08.400 happening?
00:28:09.720 As soon as
00:28:10.440 DeSantis gets
00:28:11.220 some purchase,
00:28:13.640 MSNBC starts
00:28:14.900 calling him the
00:28:15.900 tiny Mussolini,
00:28:18.480 which is super
00:28:19.880 racist, by the
00:28:20.660 way.
00:28:23.440 Work with me
00:28:24.360 here for a
00:28:24.820 moment.
00:28:25.720 True or
00:28:26.120 false?
00:28:27.260 If the
00:28:28.500 Democrats are
00:28:29.180 calling Trump
00:28:30.040 Hitler, because
00:28:32.780 Trump is
00:28:33.340 German by
00:28:34.420 ancestry, and
00:28:36.300 they're calling
00:28:36.900 DeSantis
00:28:37.720 Mussolini, that's
00:28:40.940 not racist?
00:28:44.080 I mean,
00:28:44.880 seriously.
00:28:45.220 How is that
00:28:47.360 not super
00:28:48.360 obviously racist?
00:28:50.100 Like, that's
00:28:50.720 right out there.
00:28:52.240 Is there any
00:28:52.800 interpretation
00:28:53.300 needed?
00:28:53.780 I don't think
00:28:56.160 so.
00:28:57.220 That to me
00:28:57.900 looks 100%
00:28:59.340 cleanly racist.
00:29:02.520 Yeah.
00:29:03.840 So if we
00:29:05.080 get a
00:29:05.620 Cambodian-American
00:29:06.740 guy running for
00:29:07.560 president, are
00:29:08.180 they going to
00:29:08.480 call him
00:29:08.860 Pol Pot?
00:29:10.320 You betcha.
00:29:11.700 You betcha.
00:29:13.100 Do you know
00:29:13.500 why?
00:29:14.420 Because apparently
00:29:15.060 they can be
00:29:15.660 racist right in
00:29:16.460 front of you
00:29:16.840 without any
00:29:17.500 kind of
00:29:17.860 blowback.
00:29:19.240 There's no
00:29:19.820 blowback.
00:29:20.280 They can
00:29:21.020 just be
00:29:21.360 overtly
00:29:22.020 racist.
00:29:23.740 It's not
00:29:24.400 even a story,
00:29:25.280 because they
00:29:26.260 decided it
00:29:26.840 wasn't a
00:29:27.260 story.
00:29:28.560 And I
00:29:28.940 can't make
00:29:29.300 it a
00:29:29.520 story, so
00:29:30.520 it's just
00:29:30.800 not.
00:29:33.400 Yeah.
00:29:34.160 All right.
00:29:37.220 And this
00:29:37.960 is the
00:29:38.300 weirdest
00:29:38.560 story.
00:29:39.400 I do not
00:29:40.020 know what to
00:29:40.480 make of
00:29:40.780 this story.
00:29:41.220 So allegedly
00:29:43.040 there is
00:29:44.740 some document
00:29:45.540 called an
00:29:46.340 FD-1023,
00:29:48.940 which I'm
00:29:49.580 told they
00:29:50.360 don't, this
00:29:51.220 is an FBI
00:29:51.980 document that
00:29:53.260 writes up some
00:29:54.380 story from an
00:29:55.800 informant.
00:29:57.220 Now, my
00:29:58.940 understanding is
00:29:59.820 that they
00:30:00.260 don't use that
00:30:01.000 form unless
00:30:02.360 the informant
00:30:03.200 is credible,
00:30:04.780 in their
00:30:05.260 opinion.
00:30:07.080 So in
00:30:07.420 other words,
00:30:08.200 the form
00:30:08.740 itself is
00:30:09.400 telling you
00:30:09.820 that the
00:30:10.120 FBI believes
00:30:11.000 that it's
00:30:11.840 not necessarily
00:30:12.420 true, but
00:30:13.980 that the
00:30:14.580 source has
00:30:15.100 weight.
00:30:15.860 It's a
00:30:16.260 trusted
00:30:16.560 source.
00:30:18.020 And the
00:30:18.320 trusted
00:30:18.640 source,
00:30:20.420 allegedly,
00:30:22.540 but the
00:30:23.800 Republicans
00:30:24.560 haven't seen
00:30:25.200 it, they're
00:30:25.640 asking to
00:30:26.160 see it, but
00:30:27.120 there's some
00:30:27.480 whistleblower
00:30:28.020 that says it
00:30:28.440 exists, and
00:30:29.020 apparently
00:30:29.420 Director
00:30:30.440 Wray
00:30:30.840 confirms it
00:30:32.020 exists.
00:30:33.400 And it
00:30:33.700 seems to
00:30:34.200 show documented
00:30:35.960 evidence, this
00:30:36.820 is the claim,
00:30:37.760 this is not
00:30:38.360 confirmed,
00:30:39.560 documented
00:30:40.280 evidence of
00:30:41.060 the Biden
00:30:41.400 family taking
00:30:42.980 money for
00:30:43.800 political
00:30:45.100 favors, which
00:30:45.960 would be
00:30:46.260 illegal.
00:30:47.900 Now, question
00:30:49.540 number one,
00:30:50.880 do you believe
00:30:51.760 that if we
00:30:52.660 were to ever
00:30:53.140 see this
00:30:53.640 document,
00:30:54.480 because Comer
00:30:55.340 and whoever
00:30:57.520 else is trying
00:30:58.180 to get a hold
00:30:58.700 of it, but
00:30:59.440 the FBI
00:31:00.360 doesn't want
00:31:00.980 to give it
00:31:01.480 to them,
00:31:02.720 apparently
00:31:03.200 Director Wray
00:31:04.200 has offered
00:31:04.780 that they can
00:31:05.400 see it.
00:31:06.040 release, so
00:31:07.240 they can see
00:31:07.780 it in a
00:31:08.260 skiff, but
00:31:09.700 then the
00:31:10.120 Republicans are
00:31:10.940 saying that's
00:31:11.560 not good
00:31:11.960 enough, it
00:31:12.960 has to be
00:31:13.340 released.
00:31:14.620 Now, that's
00:31:16.700 kind of
00:31:16.960 interesting,
00:31:17.520 isn't it?
00:31:18.420 Because the
00:31:19.980 skiff would
00:31:21.400 tell me that
00:31:22.180 it's a pretty
00:31:23.180 big, if you
00:31:25.560 put it in the
00:31:26.040 skiff, that
00:31:26.560 means that
00:31:26.900 nobody can
00:31:27.340 take a copy,
00:31:28.220 they can only
00:31:28.900 go read it
00:31:29.520 in a protected
00:31:30.400 place.
00:31:31.320 That would
00:31:31.920 be for the
00:31:32.420 most sensitive
00:31:33.340 secrets, the
00:31:34.920 most sensitive
00:31:35.940 secrets.
00:31:37.240 What is it
00:31:38.000 about this
00:31:38.500 document that
00:31:39.220 makes it
00:31:39.600 that?
00:31:40.680 Why is this
00:31:41.380 a skiff-only
00:31:42.580 document?
00:31:43.720 Is it because
00:31:44.280 it's so
00:31:44.640 dangerous to
00:31:45.260 Biden?
00:31:47.200 Is it because
00:31:47.960 they don't
00:31:48.360 know if it's
00:31:48.800 true?
00:31:49.920 It could be
00:31:50.480 that they
00:31:50.780 don't know
00:31:51.080 if it's
00:31:51.360 true, which
00:31:52.860 would make
00:31:53.240 it dangerous,
00:31:54.580 right?
00:31:54.900 And that
00:31:55.220 would be a
00:31:55.540 good reason
00:31:55.920 to restrict
00:31:56.420 it, if
00:31:57.260 they didn't
00:31:57.620 think it
00:31:57.900 was true,
00:31:58.500 necessarily
00:31:59.100 true.
00:32:02.780 But
00:32:03.220 here's the
00:32:05.840 thing that's
00:32:06.220 missing in
00:32:06.660 the story.
00:32:08.920 Correct me
00:32:09.460 if I'm
00:32:09.740 wrong, but
00:32:10.940 at no time
00:32:11.640 has Director
00:32:12.780 Wray, who
00:32:14.100 seems to
00:32:14.660 confirm that
00:32:15.380 this document
00:32:15.980 exists, he
00:32:17.320 has never
00:32:17.740 characterized
00:32:18.320 it.
00:32:19.800 Is that
00:32:20.420 true?
00:32:23.000 He's only
00:32:23.660 said it
00:32:24.020 exists, but
00:32:25.440 he's not
00:32:25.800 characterized
00:32:26.420 it.
00:32:27.480 Isn't that
00:32:27.960 like really,
00:32:29.220 really missing?
00:32:30.840 Let me give
00:32:31.520 you an
00:32:31.720 example.
00:32:33.220 If he
00:32:34.100 knew that
00:32:34.580 it was
00:32:34.940 a big
00:32:35.400 nothing,
00:32:36.960 don't you
00:32:37.700 think he
00:32:38.020 would have
00:32:38.320 characterized
00:32:38.740 it as
00:32:39.500 a big
00:32:39.920 nothing, but
00:32:40.980 yes, you
00:32:41.400 can see
00:32:41.740 it.
00:32:42.500 I'll let
00:32:42.880 you see
00:32:43.140 it in
00:32:43.380 the skiff,
00:32:44.440 but I'm
00:32:44.820 telling you,
00:32:45.300 you're wasting
00:32:45.660 your time
00:32:46.120 because it's
00:32:46.520 a big
00:32:46.760 nothing.
00:32:48.280 Right?
00:32:49.020 So that
00:32:49.640 suggests to
00:32:50.780 me that
00:32:52.480 Director
00:32:52.960 Wray
00:32:53.320 thinks there's
00:32:54.140 some chance
00:32:54.740 it's a big
00:32:55.180 something.
00:32:58.560 Am I
00:32:59.140 wrong?
00:33:00.320 Because
00:33:00.720 otherwise,
00:33:01.340 he would
00:33:02.160 either give
00:33:02.760 it to
00:33:03.000 him.
00:33:03.700 Now, I
00:33:04.000 do understand
00:33:04.660 why you
00:33:05.020 might not
00:33:05.580 want to
00:33:05.820 give sensitive
00:33:06.800 things to
00:33:07.480 people, even
00:33:08.220 if they ask,
00:33:09.080 even if they
00:33:09.560 have a right.
00:33:10.440 There could
00:33:10.760 be real
00:33:11.600 security reasons
00:33:12.600 why you
00:33:12.940 don't do
00:33:13.220 that.
00:33:14.240 But not
00:33:15.000 characterizing it
00:33:16.000 is really
00:33:16.600 missing.
00:33:18.140 Or how
00:33:18.520 about this?
00:33:19.800 Yes, the
00:33:20.440 document exists,
00:33:21.680 and yes, I'll
00:33:22.520 let you see
00:33:22.980 it.
00:33:23.900 But my
00:33:24.380 issue is
00:33:25.040 that it's
00:33:25.520 not 100%
00:33:27.100 verified.
00:33:28.440 So it
00:33:29.800 might cause
00:33:30.400 more rumors
00:33:31.220 than it
00:33:32.700 should.
00:33:33.660 That would
00:33:34.260 be useful.
00:33:35.580 Right?
00:33:36.540 Wouldn't you
00:33:37.180 consider that
00:33:37.860 good and
00:33:38.500 useful
00:33:38.920 characterization
00:33:40.080 of it?
00:33:40.880 We don't
00:33:41.560 know if
00:33:41.860 it's true.
00:33:42.840 Therefore, if
00:33:43.380 you look at
00:33:43.860 it and get
00:33:44.200 all worked
00:33:44.740 up, that
00:33:45.660 might be
00:33:46.040 causing
00:33:46.300 problems.
00:33:46.880 But we'll
00:33:47.240 put it in
00:33:47.680 the skiff
00:33:48.100 so you can
00:33:49.000 see for
00:33:49.320 yourself.
00:33:49.660 I would
00:33:51.740 consider that
00:33:52.300 fairly credible
00:33:53.100 if he said
00:33:54.420 that.
00:33:55.500 But just
00:33:55.920 saying we
00:33:56.420 do have
00:33:57.000 it and
00:33:57.440 you can't
00:33:58.400 get a
00:33:58.680 copy suggests
00:34:00.600 that they
00:34:01.160 want to
00:34:01.520 keep the
00:34:02.140 ability to
00:34:02.960 mischaracterize
00:34:04.000 it.
00:34:05.100 In other
00:34:05.480 words, if
00:34:06.480 they let
00:34:06.800 the Republicans
00:34:07.340 in to look
00:34:08.040 at it, but
00:34:08.500 they couldn't
00:34:08.980 take a copy
00:34:09.660 and show
00:34:10.040 it to us,
00:34:11.380 then we
00:34:12.080 would have
00:34:12.380 to believe
00:34:12.840 the Republicans
00:34:13.480 point of
00:34:14.060 view.
00:34:15.200 And then
00:34:15.420 the Democrats
00:34:16.100 could simply
00:34:16.700 say, we
00:34:17.760 looked at
00:34:18.220 it too,
00:34:19.200 and it
00:34:19.560 doesn't
00:34:19.960 say that.
00:34:22.060 Right?
00:34:22.560 And then
00:34:22.860 that's the
00:34:23.180 end of the
00:34:23.480 story.
00:34:24.320 The Democrats
00:34:24.980 would say, we
00:34:25.460 looked at it
00:34:25.960 too, it
00:34:26.280 doesn't say
00:34:26.680 that.
00:34:28.500 That's all.
00:34:29.420 That's the
00:34:29.900 end of it.
00:34:30.660 And we
00:34:31.040 would never
00:34:31.420 know because
00:34:31.880 we can't
00:34:32.320 see it.
00:34:33.040 Then the
00:34:33.400 Republicans
00:34:33.780 would say,
00:34:34.440 you're lying,
00:34:35.340 it does
00:34:35.740 say that.
00:34:37.140 And the
00:34:37.540 Democrats
00:34:38.140 would say,
00:34:38.520 well, too
00:34:39.500 bad, nobody
00:34:40.500 else gets to
00:34:41.060 see it, and
00:34:41.460 we say it's
00:34:41.960 not there.
00:34:43.100 So it's a
00:34:43.540 tie.
00:34:46.880 Wow.
00:34:47.960 Now, I've
00:34:48.680 also heard,
00:34:49.560 that the
00:34:51.120 reason the
00:34:51.520 FBI or the
00:34:52.320 Department of
00:34:52.780 Justice is
00:34:53.860 allegedly slow
00:34:56.080 walking Hunter
00:34:57.140 Biden's
00:34:57.880 investigation, is
00:34:59.660 they're actually
00:35:00.240 trying to slow
00:35:01.140 walk it past the
00:35:02.420 statute of
00:35:03.140 limitations, and
00:35:04.960 they have a good
00:35:05.560 shot at doing
00:35:06.120 it.
00:35:07.460 Is that like
00:35:08.180 seven years or
00:35:08.980 something?
00:35:09.460 I don't know
00:35:10.060 what the actual
00:35:10.560 limit is for any
00:35:12.180 various allegations,
00:35:13.660 but it looks like
00:35:15.320 they've gone four
00:35:16.580 or five years?
00:35:19.240 How many years
00:35:20.140 have they dragged
00:35:20.760 it down so far?
00:35:22.840 And does that
00:35:23.540 mean that Joe
00:35:24.400 Biden, does that
00:35:26.800 mean that Joe
00:35:27.380 Biden needs to
00:35:28.840 have another four
00:35:29.720 years to get
00:35:31.820 Hunter over the
00:35:32.860 statute of
00:35:33.540 limitations?
00:35:34.540 Because I think
00:35:35.360 that nobody in the
00:35:36.080 government is going
00:35:36.800 to challenge the
00:35:37.500 president.
00:35:38.540 I think it's too
00:35:39.340 dangerous.
00:35:39.720 So I think that
00:35:41.780 if Joe Biden can
00:35:43.820 stay in office
00:35:44.480 four more years,
00:35:46.260 I think he can
00:35:47.140 pull Hunter over
00:35:48.220 the finish line
00:35:49.380 and get him past
00:35:49.920 the statute of
00:35:50.520 limitations.
00:35:51.520 Is that the
00:35:51.900 whole reason the
00:35:53.640 country is
00:35:54.300 being, you
00:35:56.720 know, suffering
00:35:57.580 under a Biden?
00:35:59.100 So he can keep
00:36:00.040 his son out of
00:36:00.580 jail?
00:36:01.260 Because if you
00:36:02.320 ask me why
00:36:03.000 somebody who's
00:36:03.700 400 years old
00:36:05.060 wants a second
00:36:05.740 term, I can only
00:36:07.780 think it's
00:36:08.240 personal.
00:36:09.720 That does not
00:36:10.880 seem political to
00:36:11.800 me.
00:36:13.920 Right?
00:36:14.820 It feels like Joe
00:36:16.220 is only running to
00:36:17.360 protect Hunter,
00:36:18.780 because he's the
00:36:19.280 only one who can
00:36:19.820 do it.
00:36:20.560 He is the only
00:36:21.020 one who can do
00:36:21.600 it.
00:36:22.400 You know, if you
00:36:22.800 put a Republican
00:36:24.020 and their Hunter's
00:36:24.840 in a lot of
00:36:25.260 trouble, I would
00:36:27.480 think.
00:36:28.160 Or Biden
00:36:28.880 probably thinks.
00:36:30.360 So let me ask
00:36:31.780 you, given that
00:36:33.500 there is one
00:36:35.320 source saying
00:36:37.680 this document
00:36:38.280 exists and that
00:36:39.160 it has damage
00:36:39.700 information on
00:36:40.500 it, do you
00:36:41.180 think that
00:36:41.560 that one
00:36:42.060 source, the
00:36:42.960 whistleblower,
00:36:44.740 maybe there's
00:36:45.500 more than one
00:36:46.000 whistleblower?
00:36:46.880 Give me a fact
00:36:47.480 check.
00:36:48.280 Is there more
00:36:48.940 than one
00:36:49.380 whistleblower who
00:36:51.300 has seen the
00:36:52.060 FD-1023 form
00:36:53.860 and says it's
00:36:54.860 damning?
00:36:56.020 Well, I'm
00:36:56.320 saying yes is
00:36:56.960 there's more
00:36:57.340 than one.
00:36:59.020 Okay.
00:36:59.540 More than one
00:37:00.260 changes the
00:37:00.920 story completely,
00:37:02.200 in my opinion.
00:37:03.500 If it were
00:37:04.660 only one, then
00:37:06.660 I would say,
00:37:07.700 well, that's a
00:37:09.220 wait and see.
00:37:11.040 If it's two or
00:37:12.040 three and they
00:37:13.260 separately have the
00:37:14.000 same story, then
00:37:16.220 I'd start to think
00:37:16.980 there's something
00:37:17.420 there.
00:37:18.820 But I guess I'm
00:37:21.760 expecting to be
00:37:24.880 underwhelmed if we
00:37:26.520 should ever see it.
00:37:28.180 I don't believe the
00:37:29.360 wall is closing it,
00:37:30.520 or the walls are
00:37:31.140 closing.
00:37:31.380 Do you?
00:37:33.200 Do you think
00:37:33.980 Comer has the
00:37:34.640 goods this time?
00:37:35.620 Because it feels
00:37:36.400 exactly like Schiff
00:37:38.020 chasing Trump.
00:37:40.300 The walls are
00:37:41.020 closing in.
00:37:42.000 It just doesn't
00:37:42.660 feel like it's
00:37:43.360 going to close
00:37:43.820 in.
00:37:47.680 The FBI will
00:37:48.880 release it after
00:37:49.920 Trump's arrest.
00:37:51.760 Maybe.
00:37:54.740 All right.
00:37:58.020 Here's the
00:37:58.840 latest hoax.
00:38:01.380 Trump hoax.
00:38:02.380 You know there's
00:38:02.860 going to be more.
00:38:04.300 But this is what I
00:38:05.280 call a double tap
00:38:06.400 hoax.
00:38:07.980 So a double tap
00:38:09.100 Trump hoax is
00:38:10.280 where they do the
00:38:12.100 hoax itself, and
00:38:13.980 then Trump reacts
00:38:15.380 to the hoax, and
00:38:17.480 the way he reacts
00:38:18.360 to the hoax creates
00:38:19.940 the second tap.
00:38:21.640 So for example,
00:38:23.760 they might say he's
00:38:25.200 trying to overthrow
00:38:25.880 the government, and
00:38:27.820 then he says, no,
00:38:28.980 I'm not, and
00:38:30.380 maybe I would fire
00:38:32.640 the people who
00:38:33.320 are investigating
00:38:34.640 me for this
00:38:35.240 because it's all
00:38:35.880 BS.
00:38:37.200 And then they
00:38:37.700 take the fact
00:38:38.280 that he would
00:38:38.760 fire the people
00:38:39.640 behind the
00:38:40.980 hoax as proof
00:38:43.400 that he's an
00:38:43.980 authoritarian.
00:38:46.200 So they get
00:38:46.920 two taps out of
00:38:47.760 one hoax.
00:38:48.760 The hoax
00:38:49.340 itself, and
00:38:50.800 then when he
00:38:51.220 says he'll react
00:38:52.080 to the hoax,
00:38:52.820 you know, by
00:38:53.160 getting rid of
00:38:53.640 the people who
00:38:54.860 persecuted him,
00:38:56.700 that he's an
00:38:57.380 authoritarian, a
00:38:58.860 second hoax.
00:39:01.120 They can hoax
00:39:02.040 themselves all the
00:39:02.800 way to the
00:39:03.120 bottom of the
00:39:03.540 well.
00:39:04.740 So the current
00:39:05.360 one is that
00:39:06.140 there's some
00:39:06.880 existence of
00:39:08.900 an audio in
00:39:10.660 which Trump
00:39:11.220 says he kept
00:39:12.160 some classified
00:39:12.880 documents related
00:39:14.740 to a plan to
00:39:15.680 attack Iran.
00:39:17.980 And apparently
00:39:18.860 it was General
00:39:20.720 Mark Milley's
00:39:21.840 write-up of his
00:39:23.700 plan for
00:39:24.340 attacking Iran,
00:39:25.360 which it
00:39:27.140 looks like
00:39:27.720 Trump may
00:39:28.740 have turned
00:39:29.160 down several
00:39:29.780 times.
00:39:31.400 Now, why do
00:39:32.200 you think
00:39:32.580 Trump would
00:39:33.320 want to keep
00:39:33.880 that document
00:39:34.720 of Mark
00:39:36.160 Milley with
00:39:37.680 an Iran
00:39:38.260 attack plan?
00:39:39.880 Why would
00:39:40.320 he want that?
00:39:41.600 Of all the
00:39:42.340 things he could
00:39:42.920 keep, why
00:39:43.420 would he want
00:39:43.900 that?
00:39:45.160 I have a
00:39:45.920 theory, because
00:39:47.840 it makes Mark
00:39:48.740 Milley look like
00:39:49.460 the dumbest
00:39:50.000 guy in the
00:39:50.460 world, and
00:39:51.920 a warmonger,
00:39:53.100 and somebody
00:39:53.720 who's going to
00:39:54.100 get you all
00:39:54.560 killed.
00:39:55.740 I think he
00:39:57.000 wanted that
00:39:57.500 document to
00:39:58.360 prove that his
00:39:59.560 generals were
00:40:00.260 idiots, because
00:40:01.800 he said that
00:40:02.320 directly, which
00:40:03.680 by the way, just
00:40:04.560 makes me love
00:40:05.220 him.
00:40:07.180 You know, I've
00:40:08.140 got lots of
00:40:08.580 things I can
00:40:09.100 complain about
00:40:09.900 Trump, just
00:40:11.220 like all of us
00:40:12.020 do.
00:40:12.500 I can come up
00:40:13.420 with a list.
00:40:14.460 It would look
00:40:14.920 a lot like
00:40:15.360 yours.
00:40:17.320 But when he
00:40:18.880 says that his
00:40:19.500 generals are
00:40:20.120 idiots, I 100%
00:40:22.400 believe him.
00:40:22.900 I actually
00:40:24.560 believe that
00:40:25.300 the man with
00:40:25.820 no military
00:40:26.560 experience,
00:40:27.480 Trump, would
00:40:28.920 be far more
00:40:30.120 trustworthy than
00:40:31.380 any of his
00:40:31.940 generals, because
00:40:33.620 the generals are
00:40:34.640 locked into the
00:40:35.400 military-industrial
00:40:36.340 complex, and that
00:40:37.980 makes them
00:40:38.400 completely non-credible.
00:40:40.540 I wouldn't
00:40:41.280 believe any of
00:40:41.880 them.
00:40:42.780 I don't think
00:40:43.260 they have any
00:40:43.840 credibility in
00:40:44.560 our current
00:40:44.940 system.
00:40:46.080 And Mark
00:40:46.460 Milley, in my
00:40:48.140 opinion, whenever
00:40:49.980 I see him
00:40:50.620 talk, I
00:40:51.720 think to
00:40:52.060 myself, why
00:40:53.540 does he seem
00:40:54.320 dumb?
00:40:56.460 Because there
00:40:57.280 are plenty of
00:40:58.000 politicians that
00:40:58.900 maybe are kind
00:40:59.940 of dumb, but
00:41:00.520 at least when
00:41:00.940 they talk in
00:41:01.500 public, they
00:41:02.500 can put on a
00:41:03.140 good show.
00:41:04.540 Don't you
00:41:04.960 think there
00:41:05.300 are some
00:41:05.720 politicians that
00:41:07.000 you think are
00:41:07.540 maybe not up to
00:41:08.440 the job?
00:41:09.260 But they can
00:41:09.820 still do a
00:41:10.320 speech, and it
00:41:11.660 still sounds good
00:41:12.880 for their side.
00:41:14.660 But Mark
00:41:15.180 Milley, no
00:41:16.620 matter what he
00:41:17.300 talked about,
00:41:17.920 looked dumb to
00:41:18.560 me, like he
00:41:19.600 just screams
00:41:20.140 dumb, and
00:41:21.500 that scares the
00:41:22.180 shit out of
00:41:22.700 me, because
00:41:23.580 he's the guy
00:41:24.080 with the
00:41:24.480 military might.
00:41:28.360 My guess, this
00:41:29.740 is just a
00:41:30.180 guess, just
00:41:30.740 speculation, I
00:41:31.900 think Trump
00:41:32.380 had the same
00:41:32.900 opinion of
00:41:33.440 him, that
00:41:34.300 he's actually
00:41:34.820 just dumb, and
00:41:36.760 he wanted a
00:41:37.360 document that
00:41:37.940 proved it.
00:41:39.820 That might be
00:41:40.600 why he had the
00:41:41.120 document.
00:41:41.560 I'm just
00:41:41.840 speculating, I
00:41:42.500 don't know.
00:41:42.900 I can't read
00:41:43.340 any minds.
00:41:46.040 All right.
00:41:48.560 So, there's
00:41:51.100 a study, CNN
00:41:52.240 had a little
00:41:53.340 article, that
00:41:54.920 says that people
00:41:55.580 who swear have
00:41:58.260 certain
00:41:58.580 characteristics.
00:42:00.280 Huh.
00:42:00.880 And there are
00:42:01.360 certain benefits
00:42:01.980 of swearing.
00:42:03.940 Do you know
00:42:04.800 anybody who
00:42:05.580 would fall into
00:42:06.140 this category?
00:42:07.980 Apparently, swearing
00:42:09.040 is correlated with
00:42:10.020 high intelligence.
00:42:12.600 But only if you
00:42:13.560 do it well.
00:42:14.560 You know, if
00:42:14.820 you're just doing
00:42:15.920 F-bombs and
00:42:16.940 N-words and
00:42:18.320 stuff, you
00:42:18.940 know, that's
00:42:19.440 not the clever
00:42:20.020 kind of swearing.
00:42:21.680 But apparently,
00:42:22.460 it's correlated
00:42:22.960 with high
00:42:23.400 intelligence.
00:42:24.480 Swearing is a
00:42:25.100 sign of honesty.
00:42:26.780 It can lower, it
00:42:28.100 can improve your
00:42:28.940 pain tolerance, and
00:42:30.060 it's correlated
00:42:31.420 with creativity.
00:42:35.780 So, do you
00:42:36.700 know what I say
00:42:37.440 when a study says
00:42:38.740 that swearing is
00:42:41.380 correlated with
00:42:41.900 high intelligence,
00:42:42.720 honesty, lower
00:42:43.880 pain tolerance, and
00:42:44.720 creativity?
00:42:45.220 Fuck yeah.
00:42:48.760 Yeah.
00:42:51.280 All right.
00:42:52.300 University of
00:42:53.040 North Carolina
00:42:53.720 Medical School.
00:42:56.520 This is my
00:42:57.760 favorite story of
00:42:58.560 the day.
00:42:59.620 They, too, had a
00:43:00.960 DEI task force
00:43:02.680 that came up with
00:43:04.660 some suggestions.
00:43:09.040 And when they
00:43:09.960 came up with
00:43:10.480 their suggestions,
00:43:11.900 and the
00:43:12.440 University of
00:43:13.360 North Carolina
00:43:14.640 Medical School
00:43:15.420 looked at the
00:43:16.060 suggestions, they
00:43:17.540 thought the best
00:43:18.140 thing they could
00:43:18.640 do was disband
00:43:19.900 the DEI task
00:43:21.000 force.
00:43:24.420 I got a
00:43:25.240 suggestion for
00:43:25.960 you.
00:43:26.700 How about
00:43:27.060 everything you did
00:43:27.940 is a complete
00:43:28.460 waste of time and
00:43:29.340 ridiculous, and
00:43:30.560 you're all fired.
00:43:33.620 So that's what
00:43:34.500 happened there.
00:43:35.060 some of their
00:43:37.560 recommendations were
00:43:38.560 that the
00:43:39.520 medical students
00:43:40.560 there would be
00:43:42.060 required to
00:43:42.580 study topics
00:43:43.340 such as,
00:43:44.220 quote,
00:43:44.960 unconscious bias
00:43:46.180 awareness,
00:43:47.620 understanding and
00:43:48.480 responding to
00:43:49.180 microaggressions,
00:43:50.820 and, quote,
00:43:51.640 understanding that
00:43:52.560 America's medical
00:43:53.540 system is
00:43:54.260 structurally racist.
00:43:57.200 And the
00:43:57.960 administrators at
00:43:58.780 the school said,
00:43:59.680 well, how about we
00:44:00.360 just get rid of all
00:44:01.100 of you guys, and
00:44:02.640 then everything's
00:44:03.300 fine.
00:44:06.380 All right, well,
00:44:07.140 you're going to
00:44:07.360 see more of
00:44:07.800 that.
00:44:10.180 So there's
00:44:11.000 evidence now from
00:44:12.340 the Democrats that
00:44:14.240 the GOP apparently
00:44:15.900 was willing to
00:44:17.400 default, to let
00:44:19.400 America default on
00:44:20.800 its obligations if
00:44:22.960 they didn't get
00:44:23.680 some changes to
00:44:24.860 the debt relief
00:44:26.660 and budget.
00:44:28.220 Now, I heard
00:44:30.180 that described as
00:44:31.360 Republicans'
00:44:33.300 being either
00:44:35.040 reckless or bad
00:44:36.020 or dangerous or
00:44:37.120 something, because
00:44:39.240 it was Representative
00:44:41.420 Lew who was
00:44:42.180 saying it.
00:44:42.900 So that was a
00:44:43.640 Democrat's perspective,
00:44:45.240 is that the
00:44:45.600 Republicans were
00:44:46.420 really, really on
00:44:47.980 dangerous territory,
00:44:49.640 and were literally
00:44:50.560 willing to let the
00:44:51.480 country default,
00:44:53.540 default, if they
00:44:55.300 didn't get their
00:44:56.180 Republican stuff into
00:44:57.320 the legislation.
00:44:59.460 Now, what do you
00:45:00.520 think about that?
00:45:03.060 To which I say,
00:45:04.820 finally, finally,
00:45:07.460 they weren't
00:45:08.520 bluffing.
00:45:09.740 Do you know the
00:45:10.580 best bluff if
00:45:11.820 you're negotiating?
00:45:12.880 The best bluff is
00:45:13.980 not bluffing.
00:45:16.060 You're actually
00:45:16.760 willing to do the
00:45:17.580 thing you're willing
00:45:18.160 to do, and there's
00:45:18.920 no doubt about it.
00:45:20.340 Apparently the
00:45:21.020 Republicans, and
00:45:22.920 I'm going to give
00:45:23.580 them a sitting
00:45:24.160 ovation for this,
00:45:25.620 apparently McCarthy
00:45:26.640 convinced the
00:45:28.020 Democrats that in
00:45:29.140 the real world,
00:45:30.320 they would prefer
00:45:30.940 default over the
00:45:32.180 Democrats' plans.
00:45:34.560 And do you know
00:45:34.940 what?
00:45:35.100 I agree.
00:45:36.000 I would have
00:45:36.580 preferred that the
00:45:38.740 government default
00:45:39.580 with all of the
00:45:40.980 disruption that
00:45:41.660 causes.
00:45:42.820 I prefer that.
00:45:44.380 And apparently the
00:45:45.140 Republicans were
00:45:46.140 ballsy enough to
00:45:47.200 prefer it and also
00:45:48.180 communicate it.
00:45:49.620 And they sold it
00:45:50.880 because they got
00:45:52.440 some stuff.
00:45:53.080 Now, nobody gets
00:45:53.780 everything, right?
00:45:54.620 We get to complain
00:45:55.760 about your own
00:45:56.620 side.
00:45:57.380 This is when you do
00:45:58.420 that.
00:45:59.620 But if I had a
00:46:02.940 complaint about
00:46:03.600 that, it would be
00:46:04.380 that they should
00:46:04.960 have gotten
00:46:05.260 more.
00:46:08.440 Here's what I'd
00:46:09.160 like.
00:46:10.220 I'd like to see
00:46:11.040 some legislation
00:46:11.860 that says if we
00:46:13.760 don't reduce our
00:46:15.740 debt by X amount
00:46:17.140 in the coming
00:46:18.320 budget requirements,
00:46:19.920 or budget
00:46:20.400 negotiations, that
00:46:22.040 there's no
00:46:22.460 negotiations.
00:46:24.560 That if we miss
00:46:25.400 our target this
00:46:26.160 year, and let's
00:46:27.060 say the national
00:46:28.020 debt increases,
00:46:29.660 if the national
00:46:30.280 debt increases,
00:46:31.700 I would like
00:46:32.220 legislation that
00:46:33.780 says next
00:46:34.980 year, every
00:46:36.160 budget item will
00:46:37.020 be cut by the
00:46:38.020 same percentage.
00:46:39.720 1%, 5%,
00:46:41.320 whatever it is.
00:46:43.200 You don't think
00:46:43.860 that every budget
00:46:44.740 could be cut by
00:46:45.500 5%?
00:46:47.120 Yeah, it
00:46:47.480 could.
00:46:48.360 It could.
00:46:50.040 That's how every
00:46:51.020 big business does
00:46:51.980 this.
00:46:52.440 Because I used
00:46:53.140 to work in the
00:46:54.920 budgeting and
00:46:55.700 forecasting parts of
00:46:57.220 big businesses.
00:46:58.340 That was primarily
00:46:59.260 my job, budget
00:47:00.520 forecasting.
00:47:02.020 And I can't tell
00:47:04.620 you how many times
00:47:05.460 I went through the
00:47:06.140 following process.
00:47:08.080 I would talk to
00:47:09.300 each manager and
00:47:10.460 find out what
00:47:11.020 budget they needed
00:47:11.800 for the year.
00:47:12.820 I would sum them
00:47:13.640 all up, and I'd
00:47:14.640 take them to the
00:47:15.240 big boss, and it
00:47:16.420 would be more than
00:47:17.240 the big boss thought
00:47:18.220 he could get for
00:47:19.840 his budget.
00:47:20.880 And he'd say,
00:47:21.800 all right, this is
00:47:22.320 great, just tell
00:47:23.040 everybody to cut
00:47:24.040 by 10%.
00:47:26.000 And I would say,
00:47:27.480 oh, wait, wait,
00:47:29.060 that's crazy.
00:47:30.220 That's crazy.
00:47:31.260 These people did a
00:47:32.240 lot of work to
00:47:33.540 figure out how
00:47:34.080 much they really
00:47:35.420 need to do the
00:47:37.080 job.
00:47:38.060 If you just cut
00:47:38.960 them 10%, there'll
00:47:39.760 be all these people
00:47:40.400 who just can't do
00:47:41.080 the thing.
00:47:42.360 Your whole
00:47:42.940 operation will
00:47:43.660 evaporate.
00:47:45.600 And then the top
00:47:46.760 manager looked at
00:47:47.600 me, and he smiled,
00:47:48.520 and he said, tell
00:47:51.400 them to cut
00:47:51.800 everything 10%.
00:47:52.760 And I fussed
00:47:55.980 a little bit
00:47:56.380 more, and then
00:47:58.220 he said, 10%.
00:48:00.260 And I walked
00:48:02.520 out, and I told
00:48:03.160 everybody to cut
00:48:03.840 their budget by
00:48:04.460 10%.
00:48:05.040 Do you know
00:48:05.360 what happened?
00:48:06.580 They all cut
00:48:07.320 their budget by
00:48:07.820 10%, and
00:48:08.360 everything was
00:48:08.780 fine.
00:48:10.100 They all cut
00:48:10.880 their budget by
00:48:11.420 10%, everything
00:48:12.780 was fine.
00:48:13.960 Everything.
00:48:15.360 Everything was
00:48:16.060 fine.
00:48:18.220 You don't think
00:48:18.960 the government
00:48:19.400 can do that?
00:48:21.020 Of course they
00:48:21.780 can.
00:48:22.500 Of course they
00:48:23.080 can.
00:48:23.660 And the worst
00:48:24.600 thing we could
00:48:25.100 do is let
00:48:26.500 Congress negotiate
00:48:27.520 the details.
00:48:28.980 That's the worst
00:48:29.720 thing you could
00:48:30.160 do, which is
00:48:31.260 what they do.
00:48:32.420 Don't let them
00:48:33.160 negotiate details.
00:48:34.860 Just tell them
00:48:35.380 they have 10%
00:48:36.140 less for everything
00:48:37.900 next year, and
00:48:39.800 you're done.
00:48:41.040 Now, suppose
00:48:41.660 there's a new
00:48:42.260 thing you need,
00:48:42.960 some, let's
00:48:44.060 say, AI
00:48:44.960 legislation
00:48:47.160 group, you
00:48:48.380 know, some
00:48:48.640 group that
00:48:49.220 manages AI
00:48:50.660 federally, so
00:48:51.540 you need to
00:48:51.900 fund them.
00:48:52.780 Okay, 100%
00:48:54.920 of all that
00:48:55.440 money for the
00:48:56.000 new thing
00:48:56.440 comes out of
00:48:57.820 the existing
00:48:58.340 things in an
00:48:59.880 equal way.
00:49:01.180 So for the
00:49:01.860 new thing,
00:49:02.440 everybody is,
00:49:03.080 you know, 0.01%
00:49:04.260 less in their
00:49:05.700 budget.
00:49:06.280 So it's not
00:49:06.860 just 10%,
00:49:07.520 it's 10.02.
00:49:11.000 Everybody
00:49:11.440 could live
00:49:11.940 with that.
00:49:13.340 Now you say
00:49:13.940 to yourself,
00:49:14.480 well, but what
00:49:15.080 about the things
00:49:15.600 that are based
00:49:15.960 on population,
00:49:16.780 you know, such
00:49:18.220 as there are
00:49:18.720 just more
00:49:19.200 people who
00:49:19.820 need more
00:49:20.240 services, to
00:49:21.440 which I say,
00:49:22.240 figure it
00:49:22.620 out.
00:49:23.660 Figure it
00:49:24.200 out.
00:49:24.520 It's how
00:49:24.800 businesses do
00:49:25.420 it.
00:49:26.380 They have to
00:49:27.360 do more
00:49:27.780 with less
00:49:28.380 all the
00:49:29.740 time.
00:49:30.960 They don't
00:49:31.540 have a
00:49:31.760 choice.
00:49:32.320 You're always
00:49:32.900 doing more
00:49:33.400 with less.
00:49:33.940 It's just
00:49:34.200 the basic
00:49:34.740 management
00:49:35.660 reality.
00:49:39.220 So I
00:49:41.060 would like
00:49:41.480 our government
00:49:43.060 to do less,
00:49:44.420 and if they
00:49:44.920 can't hit the,
00:49:45.700 well, here's
00:49:46.580 the way I
00:49:46.920 would put it.
00:49:48.900 Every one of
00:49:49.620 the individual
00:49:50.340 budget things
00:49:51.120 that the
00:49:51.440 government needs
00:49:52.160 are important
00:49:52.940 in their own
00:49:54.060 way, but
00:49:55.540 they're all
00:49:56.020 subsidiary to
00:49:56.860 the fact that
00:49:57.380 you can't
00:49:57.780 spend more
00:49:58.220 than you
00:49:58.480 have forever.
00:50:00.240 So that
00:50:00.800 just has to
00:50:01.300 be a bigger
00:50:01.760 objective.
00:50:03.640 And if we
00:50:04.000 can't agree
00:50:04.640 on a budget
00:50:05.460 that would
00:50:05.920 reduce it,
00:50:07.420 it just has
00:50:08.040 to be 10%
00:50:08.680 across the
00:50:09.240 board, or
00:50:09.700 whatever the
00:50:10.200 percent is,
00:50:11.600 and just
00:50:12.300 move on.
00:50:14.600 All right.
00:50:15.700 But I
00:50:16.160 like the
00:50:16.540 fact that
00:50:17.320 the original
00:50:19.160 death-sealing
00:50:19.880 idea from
00:50:20.600 the Democrats
00:50:21.320 was so
00:50:22.320 bad that
00:50:24.600 Republicans
00:50:25.160 were literally
00:50:26.140 willing to
00:50:26.760 default the
00:50:27.380 whole country
00:50:28.020 to not do
00:50:29.220 it.
00:50:30.700 And like I
00:50:31.280 say, that's
00:50:32.040 a sitting
00:50:32.380 ovation.
00:50:33.440 I'd give you
00:50:34.060 a standing
00:50:34.460 ovation if
00:50:35.200 maybe they
00:50:35.720 got a little
00:50:36.120 bit more,
00:50:36.820 reduced the
00:50:37.380 debt more,
00:50:37.960 or something
00:50:38.160 like that.
00:50:38.960 But that's
00:50:39.580 a sitting
00:50:39.920 ovation.
00:50:41.240 That's
00:50:41.640 adequate.
00:50:42.480 That's an
00:50:43.000 adequate job.
00:50:43.580 So good
00:50:44.800 on adequate
00:50:45.760 for McCarthy.
00:50:48.600 All right.
00:50:49.340 Not ideal,
00:50:50.260 but adequate.
00:50:52.740 Well, I'm
00:50:53.380 pretty sure
00:50:53.800 this is the
00:50:54.280 best live
00:50:54.780 stream you're
00:50:55.260 going to
00:50:55.420 see today.
00:50:56.040 Is there
00:50:56.220 any story
00:50:56.560 I forgot?
00:50:58.560 Anything
00:50:59.000 that you
00:50:59.480 were hoping
00:51:00.000 I would
00:51:00.400 talk about
00:51:01.020 that I
00:51:01.720 didn't?
00:51:05.520 What
00:51:05.920 convinced the
00:51:06.540 Democrats
00:51:06.900 they were
00:51:07.280 serious?
00:51:08.120 Probably just
00:51:08.780 the way they
00:51:09.320 acted and
00:51:10.100 the fact that
00:51:10.740 there weren't
00:51:13.620 enough people
00:51:14.140 breaking with
00:51:14.900 the majority,
00:51:15.640 I guess.
00:51:22.980 What
00:51:23.500 companies have
00:51:24.220 you successfully
00:51:24.940 run with
00:51:25.580 verifiable
00:51:26.160 proof?
00:51:27.180 Whenever you
00:51:27.760 talk about
00:51:28.220 your past,
00:51:28.840 you always
00:51:29.140 claim whatever
00:51:29.760 the topic
00:51:30.260 is you
00:51:30.740 used to
00:51:31.180 do.
00:51:33.740 What
00:51:34.220 made you
00:51:34.620 such a
00:51:35.020 douchebag?
00:51:36.340 Was there
00:51:36.720 something that
00:51:37.340 hurt you?
00:51:39.200 Did somebody
00:51:40.300 touch you
00:51:40.780 in the
00:51:41.000 wrong way?
00:51:42.360 Why would
00:51:42.960 you even
00:51:43.220 ask that
00:51:43.600 question in
00:51:44.100 such an
00:51:44.440 asshole way?
00:51:47.220 I might
00:51:47.960 be the
00:51:48.320 most easily
00:51:49.060 verifiable
00:51:49.780 person in
00:51:50.440 the world.
00:51:52.380 Do you
00:51:52.640 know how
00:51:52.920 many thousands
00:51:53.640 of people
00:51:54.220 are completely
00:51:55.920 aware that
00:51:56.600 I had the
00:51:57.160 jobs that
00:51:57.660 I say I
00:51:58.120 had and
00:51:59.120 how easy
00:51:59.560 it would
00:51:59.840 be to
00:52:00.240 check it?
00:52:01.900 Has
00:52:02.140 anybody ever
00:52:02.720 doubted it?
00:52:03.620 Like you
00:52:03.980 don't think
00:52:04.340 I worked
00:52:04.680 for a
00:52:04.960 bank and
00:52:06.160 did budgets?
00:52:08.920 Really?
00:52:09.360 Would I
00:52:10.140 make that
00:52:10.540 up?
00:52:11.380 I just
00:52:11.700 made up
00:52:12.080 a whole
00:52:12.280 job and
00:52:13.380 I thought
00:52:13.680 I'd get
00:52:13.940 away with
00:52:14.320 it.
00:52:15.000 Is that
00:52:15.300 what you
00:52:15.520 think?
00:52:18.840 Yeah,
00:52:19.420 Trump
00:52:19.740 increased
00:52:20.420 the debt
00:52:21.140 as well.
00:52:22.400 Absolutely.
00:52:23.620 Yeah,
00:52:23.960 I think we
00:52:25.120 can be
00:52:25.540 adult enough
00:52:26.260 to say
00:52:26.640 Trump did
00:52:27.200 some things
00:52:27.740 great,
00:52:28.880 some things
00:52:29.480 average,
00:52:30.040 and some
00:52:30.520 things you
00:52:30.920 absolutely
00:52:31.300 wish he
00:52:31.700 didn't do.
00:52:33.220 Anybody
00:52:33.620 have a
00:52:33.920 problem with
00:52:34.260 that?
00:52:36.040 Why can't
00:52:36.880 we just
00:52:37.180 talk about
00:52:37.580 it honestly?
00:52:38.020 Some
00:52:39.500 stuff
00:52:39.780 great,
00:52:40.300 some
00:52:40.480 stuff
00:52:40.740 average,
00:52:41.400 some
00:52:41.700 stuff
00:52:42.000 totally
00:52:42.480 wish
00:52:42.680 he
00:52:42.800 hadn't
00:52:42.960 done.
00:52:44.600 And that
00:52:45.060 would be
00:52:45.340 true for
00:52:45.720 all the
00:52:46.260 presidents,
00:52:47.340 but I
00:52:47.780 mean,
00:52:48.660 we're just
00:52:49.280 going to be
00:52:49.560 like idiots
00:52:50.060 if we just
00:52:50.880 say he's
00:52:51.500 the golden
00:52:52.280 boy and
00:52:53.100 does no
00:52:53.840 wrong.
00:52:54.760 Yeah,
00:52:55.160 I'm not on
00:52:55.760 that train.
00:52:56.860 Now I
00:52:57.120 know it
00:52:57.400 seemed like
00:52:58.000 that in
00:52:58.720 2016,
00:53:00.080 because I
00:53:01.000 kept telling
00:53:01.460 you that the
00:53:01.980 things other
00:53:02.420 people said
00:53:02.940 were mistakes
00:53:03.740 were not
00:53:04.160 mistakes,
00:53:04.940 but that's
00:53:05.680 because I
00:53:06.140 was right.
00:53:06.720 it's just
00:53:09.200 because I
00:53:09.600 was right.
00:53:10.200 That's why
00:53:10.540 I said
00:53:10.840 it.
00:53:14.100 All right.
00:53:20.020 Oh,
00:53:20.620 Twitter banned
00:53:21.200 the What is a
00:53:21.960 Woman documentary
00:53:22.820 today for
00:53:23.520 hate speech
00:53:24.120 and misgendering.
00:53:26.200 And Matt
00:53:26.880 Walsh is
00:53:27.380 threatened to
00:53:27.800 walk away
00:53:28.120 from Twitter.
00:53:30.180 Huh.
00:53:31.880 Twitter banned
00:53:32.740 What is a
00:53:33.380 Woman.
00:53:33.600 So that's
00:53:34.420 the little
00:53:36.080 Matt
00:53:36.420 Walsh
00:53:36.920 video.
00:53:40.180 That's
00:53:40.580 interesting.
00:53:41.220 I need to
00:53:41.880 know more
00:53:42.180 about that.
00:53:42.700 I don't
00:53:42.860 know if
00:53:43.080 that's a
00:53:43.420 Musk decision
00:53:44.240 or not.
00:53:45.460 Might be.
00:53:46.160 By the way,
00:53:46.660 Elon Musk
00:53:47.240 is back to
00:53:48.180 richest man
00:53:49.640 in the world.
00:53:50.900 Although I
00:53:51.460 don't think
00:53:51.740 that's real.
00:53:53.240 Do you
00:53:53.540 think that
00:53:53.860 we know
00:53:54.200 who the
00:53:54.480 richest
00:53:54.760 person in
00:53:56.080 the world
00:53:56.360 is?
00:53:59.260 Because I
00:53:59.880 think you
00:54:00.180 have to
00:54:00.540 include the
00:54:02.120 dictators as
00:54:03.080 owning all
00:54:03.660 of the
00:54:04.060 wealth of
00:54:04.540 the nation,
00:54:05.080 right?
00:54:05.780 Because they
00:54:06.280 have control
00:54:07.100 over it.
00:54:08.800 So I
00:54:09.220 would imagine
00:54:09.700 you've got
00:54:10.120 some Arab
00:54:11.440 nation oil
00:54:12.940 countries that
00:54:13.780 are bigger.
00:54:15.860 Tate.
00:54:16.420 Is there
00:54:16.760 some Andrew
00:54:17.500 Tate news
00:54:18.320 coming out?
00:54:24.700 Yeah,
00:54:25.380 the Vatican
00:54:25.920 may be.
00:54:28.140 Ye and
00:54:28.560 Adidas.
00:54:29.420 What's up
00:54:29.880 with Ye and
00:54:30.400 Adidas?
00:54:30.860 I don't know
00:54:31.200 anything about
00:54:31.620 that.
00:54:33.040 Can you
00:54:33.300 believe that
00:54:33.740 Ye got
00:54:34.200 married?
00:54:36.640 Isn't that
00:54:37.220 weird?
00:54:38.680 I was not
00:54:39.420 expecting him
00:54:40.000 to get
00:54:40.220 married again.
00:54:41.220 Yeah,
00:54:41.400 he got
00:54:41.560 married again.
00:54:43.280 To a
00:54:43.640 woman,
00:54:44.620 they say.
00:54:48.660 Why is
00:54:49.320 RFK wrong
00:54:50.040 that nuke
00:54:50.460 plants should
00:54:50.980 be able to
00:54:51.400 get private
00:54:51.860 insurance if
00:54:52.580 they're truly
00:54:53.040 safe?
00:54:54.400 Well,
00:54:55.180 he's wrong
00:54:55.800 because the
00:54:56.460 insurance
00:54:57.280 business,
00:55:01.780 business is
00:55:03.220 probably
00:55:03.560 looking at
00:55:04.160 older models
00:55:05.040 and looking
00:55:05.980 at the
00:55:06.260 past.
00:55:07.640 So just
00:55:09.080 as we're
00:55:09.460 talking,
00:55:09.880 insurance
00:55:10.200 should be
00:55:10.600 able to
00:55:10.840 look at
00:55:11.060 the future.
00:55:11.580 They should
00:55:12.360 also be
00:55:13.000 able to
00:55:13.240 look at
00:55:13.480 the past.
00:55:14.420 But the
00:55:14.780 past is
00:55:15.240 misleading.
00:55:15.660 So this
00:55:17.100 is another
00:55:17.500 case where
00:55:18.240 if the
00:55:18.700 insurance
00:55:19.060 companies
00:55:19.540 could base
00:55:20.820 on what
00:55:21.320 the future
00:55:21.840 looks like
00:55:22.400 versus how
00:55:23.120 things have
00:55:23.600 gone in
00:55:23.940 the past,
00:55:24.760 they would
00:55:25.200 make different
00:55:25.700 decisions.
00:55:26.700 In my
00:55:27.120 opinion,
00:55:28.280 nuclear
00:55:29.140 plants should
00:55:30.280 be insured
00:55:30.840 by the
00:55:31.360 government
00:55:31.740 and the
00:55:33.420 company
00:55:33.740 itself,
00:55:34.360 because the
00:55:34.840 company
00:55:35.040 itself might
00:55:35.540 go out of
00:55:35.860 business if
00:55:36.400 something goes
00:55:36.800 bad.
00:55:37.620 But I
00:55:38.200 don't think
00:55:38.580 that private
00:55:39.060 insurance
00:55:39.500 companies should
00:55:40.120 be in the
00:55:40.440 business of
00:55:41.120 insuring
00:55:41.640 nukes.
00:55:42.840 And the
00:55:43.720 reason is
00:55:44.340 that if
00:55:45.860 anything goes
00:55:46.440 wrong with
00:55:46.800 a nuclear
00:55:47.220 plant,
00:55:48.040 potentially,
00:55:49.820 it could be
00:55:51.060 really expensive.
00:55:52.880 So that
00:55:53.920 might be more
00:55:54.500 than a
00:55:55.240 company wants
00:55:55.800 to take a
00:55:56.240 risk of.
00:55:57.020 So they
00:55:57.340 might make
00:55:57.840 all kinds
00:55:58.740 of money
00:55:59.060 for 20
00:55:59.640 years.
00:56:00.600 One
00:56:01.160 meltdown
00:56:01.880 could wipe
00:56:03.200 out their
00:56:03.580 profitability
00:56:04.120 for the
00:56:04.580 whole 20
00:56:05.000 years.
00:56:06.140 So from
00:56:07.920 an economic
00:56:08.520 model perspective,
00:56:09.980 it's not that
00:56:10.720 insurance companies
00:56:11.640 are smarter
00:56:12.260 than we
00:56:12.700 are, it's
00:56:13.680 just that
00:56:14.060 the size
00:56:14.580 of the
00:56:14.820 risk is
00:56:15.280 a government
00:56:15.760 size, not
00:56:16.480 a company
00:56:16.900 size.
00:56:17.680 Does that
00:56:18.120 make sense?
00:56:19.260 Did I sell
00:56:19.800 that?
00:56:21.500 It's just
00:56:22.140 that the
00:56:22.520 nature of
00:56:23.060 the risk
00:56:23.640 is, I
00:56:26.360 think, it's
00:56:26.680 very small
00:56:27.220 risk, but
00:56:28.400 that's why
00:56:28.720 you have
00:56:28.960 insurance.
00:56:29.900 You know,
00:56:30.160 there's a
00:56:30.500 small risk
00:56:31.200 that I will
00:56:31.740 die today,
00:56:33.160 but I have
00:56:34.280 insurance
00:56:34.760 today.
00:56:36.700 You know,
00:56:36.940 even those
00:56:37.400 are very
00:56:38.260 small risks
00:56:39.020 that I'll
00:56:39.860 die today.
00:56:40.920 So it's
00:56:41.400 very common
00:56:41.960 to have
00:56:42.340 insurance for
00:56:43.560 something of
00:56:44.200 which the
00:56:44.640 actual risk
00:56:45.420 is very
00:56:45.920 small, but
00:56:47.640 if it
00:56:47.960 happened, it
00:56:48.420 would be
00:56:48.640 very bad,
00:56:49.740 right?
00:56:50.120 If I
00:56:50.580 died today,
00:56:51.720 that'd be
00:56:52.060 very bad.
00:56:55.060 But very,
00:56:55.920 very small
00:56:56.260 risk.
00:56:56.880 So I think
00:56:57.280 it's just a
00:56:58.120 country-sized
00:56:59.020 risk and
00:56:59.740 not an
00:57:00.520 insurance
00:57:01.560 company risk.
00:57:02.540 And the
00:57:02.880 reason a
00:57:03.580 country could
00:57:04.220 take it
00:57:04.620 on is
00:57:05.880 because the
00:57:06.400 country gets
00:57:06.960 a benefit
00:57:07.420 that the
00:57:07.980 insurance
00:57:08.400 company does
00:57:09.260 not get.
00:57:09.800 if you're
00:57:10.720 managing a
00:57:11.300 country, you
00:57:12.980 want energy
00:57:13.640 to be as
00:57:14.360 available as
00:57:15.000 possible.
00:57:15.720 If you're
00:57:16.280 managing an
00:57:17.060 insurance
00:57:17.500 company, then
00:57:18.920 you're just
00:57:19.200 looking at
00:57:19.560 actuarial
00:57:20.240 tables.
00:57:20.760 You're not
00:57:21.340 looking at
00:57:21.740 the benefit
00:57:22.720 of the
00:57:23.000 country so
00:57:23.500 much.
00:57:27.580 Are the
00:57:28.380 Rolls-Royce
00:57:29.180 new plants
00:57:30.060 insurable?
00:57:31.620 Good question.
00:57:32.820 So Rolls-Royce
00:57:33.560 is making
00:57:34.020 these small
00:57:35.080 modular reactors,
00:57:36.460 and they
00:57:37.480 are in the
00:57:38.000 business of
00:57:38.500 making them.
00:57:39.600 They're not
00:57:40.040 thinking about
00:57:40.720 it, they're
00:57:41.100 in the
00:57:41.440 business of
00:57:41.900 making them.
00:57:42.960 Did they
00:57:43.340 get insurance?
00:57:46.700 That would
00:57:47.220 be the
00:57:47.460 question, right?
00:57:48.140 Don't you
00:57:48.600 assume they
00:57:48.980 did?
00:57:49.900 Because I
00:57:50.280 doubt they'd
00:57:50.680 be operating
00:57:51.200 if they
00:57:51.520 didn't have
00:57:51.920 it.
00:57:53.640 Maybe.
00:57:54.340 I mean, if
00:57:54.700 they're still
00:57:55.920 using some
00:57:56.480 kind of venture
00:57:57.120 capital or
00:57:57.720 something, maybe
00:57:58.700 they don't
00:57:59.020 have insurance.
00:57:59.640 I think
00:58:06.460 State Farm
00:58:07.160 is only
00:58:07.740 not going
00:58:08.300 to insure
00:58:09.040 for new
00:58:11.040 accounts, so
00:58:12.240 they're going
00:58:12.520 to service,
00:58:14.080 you know, if
00:58:14.440 you already
00:58:14.740 have the
00:58:15.060 insurance, you're
00:58:15.600 good.
00:58:16.820 I don't know
00:58:17.460 if you can
00:58:17.780 renew it, though.
00:58:18.560 You might not
00:58:19.100 be able to
00:58:19.460 renew it.
00:58:21.760 No, they
00:58:22.340 don't.
00:58:22.980 They're
00:58:23.180 self-insured.
00:58:24.140 You actually
00:58:24.580 know that?
00:58:26.080 There's somebody
00:58:26.760 here who knows
00:58:27.500 if the Rolls-Royce
00:58:29.180 plant is
00:58:29.880 insured.
00:58:31.200 How in the
00:58:31.860 world would
00:58:32.220 you know
00:58:32.500 that?
00:58:38.540 Would Scott
00:58:39.260 like a
00:58:39.720 thorium reactor
00:58:40.600 in his
00:58:40.920 backyard, or
00:58:41.920 is he
00:58:42.220 nymphy?
00:58:45.660 I think I
00:58:46.480 would have
00:58:46.700 the same
00:58:47.060 opinion as
00:58:47.840 everybody
00:58:48.120 else.
00:58:49.980 Wouldn't
00:58:50.420 you all
00:58:50.720 have the
00:58:51.020 same
00:58:51.220 opinion?
00:58:53.100 That you'd
00:58:53.840 like it in
00:58:54.280 somebody else's
00:58:54.960 backyard if
00:58:55.740 you have a
00:58:56.080 choice?
00:58:57.460 Is that
00:58:58.060 dumb?
00:58:59.180 But it's
00:59:00.720 also true
00:59:01.340 that I
00:59:02.440 live near a
00:59:03.220 nuclear facility.
00:59:04.800 I do
00:59:05.620 willingly live
00:59:06.380 near a
00:59:06.760 nuclear facility.
00:59:09.020 So what's
00:59:11.120 that do to
00:59:11.480 your argument?
00:59:12.800 I literally
00:59:13.680 live within the
00:59:14.600 blast zone of
00:59:15.240 a nuclear
00:59:15.700 facility.
00:59:18.480 And I
00:59:19.220 chose to.
00:59:20.140 I knew it
00:59:20.620 when I built
00:59:22.520 my house.
00:59:23.400 So I guess I
00:59:24.660 passed that
00:59:25.120 test.
00:59:25.880 I passed the
00:59:26.540 test of being
00:59:27.320 near a nuclear
00:59:28.000 site.
00:59:28.500 and it
00:59:29.880 didn't
00:59:30.460 change any
00:59:31.360 of my
00:59:31.780 actions.
00:59:36.520 Scott, you
00:59:37.240 can still
00:59:37.680 save your
00:59:38.200 soul if I
00:59:39.080 become a
00:59:39.500 Christian.
00:59:42.040 All right.
00:59:49.920 Was the
00:59:50.540 land cheap?
00:59:51.420 thorium reactors.
00:59:59.580 Some people
01:00:00.460 like them.
01:00:03.500 Yeah, it's
01:00:04.220 time to wrap
01:00:04.700 up YouTube.
01:00:07.040 All right,
01:00:07.580 YouTubers.
01:00:09.020 Thanks for
01:00:09.640 joining, and
01:00:10.740 I will
01:00:11.220 go save my
01:00:15.260 soul.
01:00:15.500 You know,
01:00:16.540 the good
01:00:16.820 news is I
01:00:17.340 don't have
01:00:17.700 one.
01:00:19.540 So there's
01:00:21.660 that.
01:00:23.020 How many of
01:00:23.580 you believe you
01:00:24.200 have a soul?
01:00:31.560 Mostly
01:00:32.000 yeses?
01:00:35.200 A smattering
01:00:36.160 of no.
01:00:38.960 Mostly yes.
01:00:40.180 And do you
01:00:40.920 think you would
01:00:41.420 define a soul the
01:00:42.300 same way?
01:00:42.660 Well, let me
01:00:44.940 ask you this.
01:00:45.660 Does your soul
01:00:46.280 have a memory
01:00:47.020 like a brain
01:00:47.920 does?
01:00:49.280 Does your soul
01:00:49.940 have a memory?
01:00:53.220 No?
01:00:54.880 Yes.
01:00:55.320 So some of
01:00:56.140 you say that
01:00:56.740 your soul
01:00:57.240 has a memory
01:00:58.340 just like a
01:00:59.260 physical brain
01:01:00.020 or a computer
01:01:00.600 does.
01:01:03.380 What is a
01:01:04.120 soul made
01:01:04.580 of enough
01:01:04.920 that it
01:01:05.180 can have a
01:01:05.580 memory?
01:01:07.220 Because I
01:01:07.620 understand how
01:01:08.320 a brain or
01:01:09.160 a computer
01:01:09.660 can have a
01:01:10.240 memory because
01:01:11.380 it's a
01:01:11.740 physical change
01:01:12.600 on a
01:01:12.900 physical object.
01:01:14.580 But a soul
01:01:15.380 has no
01:01:16.000 physicality,
01:01:17.640 so what
01:01:18.040 would be the
01:01:18.700 mechanism for
01:01:19.420 memory
01:01:19.860 production?
01:01:23.440 Yeah, you
01:01:24.080 could be a
01:01:24.500 spiritual being
01:01:25.480 but would
01:01:26.500 your spiritual
01:01:27.060 being have
01:01:27.660 a memory?
01:01:29.140 Because memory
01:01:29.700 is part of
01:01:30.240 the physical
01:01:30.720 world.
01:01:31.320 We don't
01:01:31.780 have a
01:01:33.180 sense of
01:01:33.580 how that
01:01:33.840 could exist
01:01:34.360 in a
01:01:34.800 non-physical
01:01:35.400 world.
01:01:39.760 So is
01:01:42.660 it consistent
01:01:43.880 to believe
01:01:44.500 that your
01:01:45.220 soul is
01:01:47.000 non-physical
01:01:47.940 but that it
01:01:49.120 has memory?
01:01:50.360 Could a
01:01:50.740 non-physical
01:01:51.400 thing have
01:01:51.900 memory?
01:01:55.440 Yes?
01:01:57.920 So a
01:01:58.660 non-physical
01:01:59.320 thing could
01:01:59.740 have a
01:02:00.020 memory.
01:02:01.080 Even though
01:02:01.820 the way we
01:02:02.380 store memories
01:02:03.100 is on a
01:02:03.880 physical object.
01:02:05.800 How would
01:02:06.360 you store it?
01:02:07.160 What would
01:02:07.480 it be stored
01:02:07.980 in?
01:02:08.340 What would
01:02:08.900 be the
01:02:09.540 soup in
01:02:11.140 which those
01:02:11.660 memories are
01:02:12.320 stored?
01:02:16.100 Spirit
01:02:16.580 bites.
01:02:17.960 It's in
01:02:18.480 the cloud.
01:02:18.920 your soul
01:02:22.560 has a
01:02:22.920 history
01:02:23.280 but does
01:02:25.420 it remember
01:02:25.860 its history?
01:02:27.180 And where
01:02:27.580 would it
01:02:27.900 store that
01:02:28.380 memory?
01:02:31.100 So I
01:02:32.320 guess the
01:02:32.920 part
01:02:33.180 where I
01:02:35.260 say that
01:02:35.740 souls are
01:02:36.600 imaginary
01:02:37.600 well let
01:02:40.840 me put it
01:02:41.200 in a
01:02:41.340 different way.
01:02:42.340 I believe
01:02:42.980 that I
01:02:43.420 have a
01:02:43.960 soul in
01:02:45.060 a physical
01:02:46.040 sense.
01:02:46.560 but it's
01:02:48.720 like a
01:02:49.280 boundary
01:02:49.700 thing where
01:02:50.420 you can see
01:02:50.960 a boundary
01:02:51.440 but a
01:02:51.880 boundary
01:02:52.140 doesn't
01:02:52.560 exist.
01:02:53.640 If you
01:02:54.640 look at
01:02:54.940 the horizon
01:02:55.620 you can
01:02:57.000 point to
01:02:57.440 the horizon
01:02:57.940 and say
01:02:58.340 alright there's
01:02:58.760 the horizon
01:02:59.220 but there's
01:03:00.260 no horizon.
01:03:02.500 You can't
01:03:03.060 grab a
01:03:03.480 handful of
01:03:04.000 horizon.
01:03:05.440 It's a
01:03:06.040 concept.
01:03:06.940 So it
01:03:07.180 could be
01:03:07.600 that your
01:03:08.040 soul is
01:03:08.460 more of
01:03:08.740 a concept
01:03:09.320 and here's
01:03:11.240 a concept
01:03:11.700 that I
01:03:12.280 buy into.
01:03:13.440 that the
01:03:16.500 things you
01:03:16.940 do in
01:03:17.280 your life
01:03:17.840 create a
01:03:19.140 permanent
01:03:19.520 ripple into
01:03:20.300 the future
01:03:20.820 because energy
01:03:22.180 never changes.
01:03:23.420 It's always
01:03:23.940 doing something.
01:03:25.820 So whatever
01:03:26.900 permanent
01:03:27.440 ripples I
01:03:28.160 put on
01:03:28.640 history
01:03:29.560 is my
01:03:30.820 soul.
01:03:31.900 For example
01:03:32.720 I introduced
01:03:34.420 the concept
01:03:34.980 of a
01:03:35.360 talent stack
01:03:36.120 which you
01:03:37.160 see in a
01:03:37.500 lot of
01:03:37.680 other books
01:03:38.160 now and
01:03:38.680 people use
01:03:39.300 it and
01:03:39.520 talk about
01:03:39.940 it.
01:03:41.020 That's my
01:03:41.820 soul.
01:03:42.120 not by
01:03:43.800 itself but
01:03:44.600 the things
01:03:45.500 which I
01:03:45.900 changed
01:03:46.480 during my
01:03:47.440 life will
01:03:48.920 ripple
01:03:49.360 forever.
01:03:50.660 Dilbert will
01:03:52.180 probably be
01:03:52.560 there for a
01:03:53.000 while.
01:03:53.540 Now it
01:03:53.740 might decrease
01:03:54.440 in the sense
01:03:55.300 that you
01:03:55.560 can't recognize
01:03:56.360 the impact.
01:03:57.820 So after
01:03:58.260 a generation
01:03:59.260 or so you
01:04:00.600 might not
01:04:01.000 see any
01:04:01.420 direct thing
01:04:02.060 that I
01:04:02.480 ever left
01:04:02.920 on this
01:04:03.320 earth.
01:04:04.240 But maybe
01:04:04.720 indirectly
01:04:05.360 combined with
01:04:07.380 all the
01:04:07.700 other souls
01:04:08.360 and their
01:04:08.820 impact on
01:04:09.360 everything
01:04:09.680 indirectly I
01:04:11.560 might be
01:04:12.020 some small
01:04:13.100 percentage of
01:04:13.900 what happened
01:04:14.800 in the future
01:04:15.320 and I call
01:04:16.400 that my
01:04:17.760 soul.
01:04:21.260 All right.
01:04:22.780 So that
01:04:23.560 would be an
01:04:24.120 example of
01:04:24.640 how you
01:04:24.900 could have
01:04:25.120 a soul
01:04:25.540 that doesn't
01:04:26.380 need a
01:04:27.320 memory.
01:04:28.500 So the
01:04:29.180 soul that
01:04:29.660 is just
01:04:30.040 the ripple
01:04:30.780 of your
01:04:31.260 life,
01:04:32.180 the things
01:04:33.040 that you
01:04:33.320 did in
01:04:33.680 your life,
01:04:34.420 that doesn't
01:04:34.960 have a
01:04:35.220 memory.
01:04:36.740 It is
01:04:37.300 simply cause
01:04:37.920 and effect.
01:04:38.920 But I
01:04:39.240 would buy
01:04:39.960 into that
01:04:40.400 as being a
01:04:40.900 soul.
01:04:47.200 If I'm
01:04:47.820 an avatar,
01:04:48.600 my soul
01:04:49.100 is actually
01:04:49.720 in my
01:04:50.380 creator's
01:04:51.060 experience,
01:04:52.260 not mine.
01:04:58.800 Yeah.
01:05:00.320 Boy, you
01:05:00.860 know, and
01:05:01.300 I'm seeing a
01:05:01.980 reference here
01:05:02.660 on YouTube,
01:05:03.440 but I
01:05:04.880 didn't realize
01:05:05.360 at the time
01:05:05.820 how much,
01:05:07.200 how important
01:05:07.860 it was when
01:05:08.660 I was doing
01:05:09.280 two live
01:05:10.200 streams a
01:05:10.680 day during
01:05:11.040 the pandemic,
01:05:12.300 during the
01:05:12.660 lockdowns.
01:05:14.400 People
01:05:14.800 continue to
01:05:15.520 tell me how
01:05:16.020 that was
01:05:17.860 a good
01:05:19.500 mental health
01:05:20.220 process,
01:05:20.840 I guess.
01:05:22.140 Yeah, I'm
01:05:22.440 seeing lots
01:05:22.840 of people
01:05:23.060 say yes
01:05:23.500 to that.
01:05:24.160 Now,
01:05:27.220 well, I'd
01:05:28.700 love to
01:05:29.020 think it
01:05:29.380 saved lives.
01:05:29.980 I don't
01:05:30.240 know.
01:05:32.440 Yeah, I
01:05:32.980 thought it
01:05:33.260 was important.
01:05:34.420 I just
01:05:34.820 didn't realize
01:05:35.340 how important.
01:05:37.000 Just didn't
01:05:37.480 realize it.
01:05:37.960 So I'm
01:05:38.480 glad I
01:05:38.800 did that.
01:05:39.840 And I'm
01:05:40.100 glad that
01:05:40.480 that brought
01:05:40.920 us together.
01:05:42.200 And YouTube,
01:05:43.120 I'm going to
01:05:43.420 say bye for
01:05:44.120 now.
01:05:44.800 Just talk to
01:05:45.740 the locals
01:05:46.240 people a
01:05:46.640 little bit
01:05:46.880 more.
01:05:47.700 And I'll
01:05:48.020 see you
01:05:48.260 tomorrow.
01:05:48.920 Thanks for
01:05:49.320 joining.