Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2141 Scott Adams： Trump Sock Drawer Argument, Fox News Chyron Hero, Canadian Arsonists, More

00:00:00.700 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.

00:00:06.520 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and I don't know why the ancients didn't think of it, but here it is now.

00:00:12.580 Lucky, think of it.

00:00:15.080 Millions of years of human evolution, and you happen to be alive at the same time as a simultaneous sip.

00:00:22.440 If you'd like to participate, all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass of tank or chalice or stine, a canteen, jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:30.580 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.

00:00:33.520 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day.

00:00:36.740 The thing that makes everything better is called the simultaneous sip.

00:00:41.060 It happens now. Go.

00:00:47.020 Ah.

00:00:47.460 For those of you in a different time zone, just wait.

00:00:54.260 59 minutes, and you'll be ready.

00:00:57.400 All right.

00:00:59.020 Here's some stories.

00:01:00.240 This one's sort of a repeat, but I like it so much I'm going to tell you.

00:01:04.160 Researchers at MIT have developed this absorbent hydrogel.

00:01:10.760 Have you heard this story?

00:01:13.000 An absorbent hydrogel.

00:01:15.340 And what it does is it sucks moisture out of the air.

00:01:21.220 So you could put this hydrogel in the desert, and it would create drinking water.

00:01:26.740 It just sits there.

00:01:28.260 Now, here's the great part.

00:01:29.980 I believe it's infinitely reusable.

00:01:32.860 It doesn't wear out.

00:01:34.080 It doesn't get waterlogged.

00:01:36.160 It just continues sucking water out of the air, and then you have clean water.

00:01:40.980 Now, what would happen to the world?

00:01:45.780 Oh, and also, apparently it's easy to mass produce it.

00:01:50.860 Did we just solve the entire water problem of the world?

00:01:54.520 Except maybe for agriculture.

00:01:57.480 But would this allow people to live on the ocean?

00:02:02.260 Because this isn't the biggest problem of living in the ocean, getting water, right?

00:02:09.020 You'd use a lot of energy to desalinate.

00:02:12.220 So if you didn't need to use any of your energy to desalinate, could you not live on the ocean?

00:02:18.340 On a big old barge?

00:02:20.840 It really could change everything.

00:02:22.700 The entire nature of how human beings live in the world could be changed by this little hydrogel.

00:02:28.680 Because now you're not bound by water supplies.

00:02:31.860 Humans have been bound by water, access to water forever.

00:02:36.720 What if we're free to that?

00:02:39.900 Interesting, interesting thought.

00:02:41.960 Imagine that at the same time as fusion.

00:02:45.640 Because it always takes 10 years for anything to get big.

00:02:49.900 But suppose we had fusion energy, effectively almost free and infinite.

00:02:55.300 At the same time, we had free and infinite water.

00:02:59.220 The two things that a civilization needs the most to thrive.

00:03:03.540 There are some really good things coming.

00:03:05.560 Until AI kills us all, of course.

00:03:07.720 I mean, that's coming.

00:03:09.040 By the way, in the Dilbert Reborn comic that you can only see if you're a subscriber on Twitter,

00:03:14.060 to my Twitter feed, or if you're on the Locals platform, scottadams.locals.com,

00:03:19.440 you would see that Dilbert's CEO is now testifying to Congress

00:03:24.120 about the dangers of their AI product.

00:03:26.960 So if you want to see Dilbert's CEO testifying to Congress about the dangers of AI,

00:03:33.000 that's how you do it.

00:03:35.400 All right.

00:03:35.700 Apparently, these Canadian wildfires seem to have been set by arsonists.

00:03:44.140 And it appears they have an ongoing Canadian arson problem.

00:03:49.380 And, of course, the question is, is somebody paying these people?

00:03:55.720 Are they environmentalists who are kind of warped,

00:03:59.640 and they think this will make people do something about climate change?

00:04:03.440 Because the news is covering it as a climate change story.

00:04:07.320 It doesn't even seem a little bit like a climate change story.

00:04:10.820 It seems like a giant arson story.

00:04:12.740 But do you think that individuals just sort of wake up one day

00:04:17.780 and a bunch of completely different people say,

00:04:20.800 you know what would be fun?

00:04:22.640 Has anybody ever thought of burning down a forest?

00:04:25.140 And then they go and do it?

00:04:27.360 Well, there's something going on,

00:04:30.160 and it might be just a psychological effect.

00:04:32.220 I don't necessarily see a grand Chinese plot behind any of it,

00:04:38.260 but maybe.

00:04:40.240 I mean, if I were China and I were trying to destroy North America,

00:04:44.960 I would do it with matches.

00:04:47.820 So I don't know if they've figured that out yet,

00:04:50.820 but they will.

00:04:54.180 Well, Joe Rogan's sort of a, you know,

00:04:56.820 his importance in our society continues.

00:05:00.600 And I feel like he's calling a top.

00:05:05.500 You know, I've done this before,

00:05:07.060 but nobody's believing me yet,

00:05:08.700 so I'll just keep saying it until it's true.

00:05:11.000 That wokeness, like everything else, has a limit.

00:05:14.560 And I think we reached our wokeness limit.

00:05:17.600 And the way that you can tell

00:05:19.040 is that people can say aloud

00:05:21.540 things you couldn't say even a year ago.

00:05:25.120 You can just say it.

00:05:27.340 Here's what Joe Rogan said.

00:05:29.900 He said he would vote for Trump over Biden

00:05:32.820 because Biden's, you know, mentally gone, basically.

00:05:37.420 And Biden's cabinet is a, quote, 1.00

00:05:41.880 fucking sideshow of diversity. 1.00

00:05:44.760 It's people you wouldn't hire to run a Ben and Jerry's. 0.99

00:05:47.840 Now, how long ago was it?

00:05:54.520 Was it one year ago

00:05:56.120 that you wouldn't see somebody like Joe Rogan

00:05:59.540 say they would vote for Trump, first of all?

00:06:03.400 Is that news?

00:06:05.240 That feels like news.

00:06:07.480 That he would say right out loud,

00:06:09.780 no ambiguity,

00:06:11.280 if it's those two, I'm going to vote for Trump 1.00

00:06:13.180 because one of them doesn't have a brain. 0.98

00:06:14.980 I don't think you could say that a year ago. 0.64

00:06:18.660 But he says it, you know,

00:06:19.900 without anything held back.

00:06:22.640 But then he goes after the diversity hires in the cabinet.

00:06:27.780 Is it only because he's Joe Rogan

00:06:29.940 that he can say that?

00:06:31.940 Could the rest of us say

00:06:33.020 the diversity hires are destroying the country? 1.00

00:06:35.080 By the way, I have no reason to believe they are.

00:06:41.100 I don't have any special knowledge

00:06:43.520 that these cabinet members

00:06:45.480 are worse than other cabinet members.

00:06:47.860 I mean, I always think cabinet members 1.00

00:06:49.180 are just clowns anyway. 0.97

00:06:51.180 Does anybody take cabinet members seriously? 0.98

00:06:55.440 You know, maybe Secretary of State,

00:06:57.160 then you're done, right?

00:06:58.840 But don't we have a long history

00:07:03.040 of putting political cronies in cabinet positions?

00:07:08.400 I mean, is Pete Buttigieg

00:07:10.080 the cabinet head of transportation

00:07:13.340 because of all of his transportation experience?

00:07:16.980 Or is it just like it always is?

00:07:19.900 You know, everybody's just getting

00:07:21.120 their little rewards and stuff.

00:07:23.700 Yeah, so I would challenge Joe Rogan

00:07:27.400 on the basic question

00:07:28.520 of whether we've ever had

00:07:30.500 competent cabinet members

00:07:32.560 beyond Secretary of State.

00:07:34.900 We probably do pretty good

00:07:36.140 with state and maybe energy.

00:07:39.140 But after that,

00:07:40.060 I think it's just political stuff.

00:07:42.800 So, but anyway,

00:07:43.820 the point is not so much about the cabinet.

00:07:45.540 The point is more that

00:07:46.980 Joe Rogan can say that out loud.

00:07:49.280 And I believe there will be no penalty.

00:07:52.080 I believe there will be no penalty

00:07:53.580 for anything he said about that.

00:07:55.920 What do you think?

00:07:57.400 Do you think a corner has been turned?

00:08:00.160 And I think the

00:08:01.160 the individual stealing the dresses

00:08:05.920 from the airport

00:08:07.020 probably had a lot to do with

00:08:08.580 how people feel about the cabinet.

00:08:11.320 And then Buttigieg is,

00:08:13.100 you know,

00:08:13.500 had some issues.

00:08:16.000 I don't know that Buttigieg

00:08:17.160 is doing a bad job, by the way.

00:08:19.140 I wouldn't know.

00:08:20.040 How would anybody know?

00:08:20.860 You know, there were a few

00:08:22.200 high-profile things

00:08:23.600 where people said

00:08:24.500 he went to Palestine

00:08:26.760 and he wore his good shoes.

00:08:29.520 Everybody should know

00:08:30.480 not to wear your good shoes

00:08:31.760 to the disaster zone.

00:08:34.120 All right.

00:08:35.500 Okay. 0.97

00:08:36.800 He's a gay guy with good footwear.

00:08:39.700 Are we really holding that against him? 0.93

00:08:42.380 A gay guy with good footwear. 0.64

00:08:45.100 Okay. 0.67

00:08:46.020 I mean, if that's the worst you have,

00:08:47.760 I'm not going to worry too much

00:08:49.120 about his performance.

00:08:51.980 Anyway, I'm not saying

00:08:52.940 he's doing a good job.

00:08:53.960 I'm saying we can't tell.

00:08:55.900 Is that clear?

00:08:56.980 I'm not supporting him.

00:08:58.600 I'm just saying,

00:08:59.180 how would you know

00:08:59.720 if he's doing a good or bad job?

00:09:01.460 The stuff that's in the news

00:09:02.880 is also propagandized.

00:09:04.540 You can't really tell

00:09:05.260 if he's doing a good or bad job.

00:09:07.780 You really can't.

00:09:08.500 All right.

00:09:11.680 Joe Rogan also had...

00:09:13.480 Well, I have one more question.

00:09:15.160 When Joe Rogan said

00:09:16.580 that Ben & Jerry's...

00:09:18.580 that the cabinet members

00:09:20.520 couldn't run a Ben & Jerry's,

00:09:22.740 somebody tweeted

00:09:24.520 that Ben & Jerry's is so woke

00:09:26.200 their Burlington, Vermont flagship

00:09:28.920 scoop shop

00:09:29.820 has a

00:09:30.980 we must dismantle

00:09:32.420 white supremacy sign

00:09:33.880 in the window.

00:09:34.400 So, you get your ice cream

00:09:38.200 and your politics

00:09:38.900 in the same place.

00:09:40.200 We must dismantle

00:09:41.180 white supremacy.

00:09:42.860 Now, I have a question

00:09:43.940 for Ben & Jerry's.

00:09:46.780 Do they still sell vanilla?

00:09:53.040 Anybody?

00:09:57.000 That's actually a real question.

00:09:59.180 Do they sell vanilla?

00:10:03.060 They do?

00:10:04.400 I'm going to have to see it

00:10:05.380 because I don't believe you.

00:10:08.080 I don't believe

00:10:08.780 they sell vanilla ice cream.

00:10:11.580 All right.

00:10:12.080 Well, I'm going to have to see proof.

00:10:13.340 I don't believe it.

00:10:14.780 I think they've got to

00:10:15.680 dismantle that stuff.

00:10:17.620 Well, Joe Rogan

00:10:19.360 also had RFK Jr. on

00:10:20.620 and he asked him directly...

00:10:22.860 This is why we love Joe Rogan, right?

00:10:25.500 Has anybody asked this question

00:10:27.080 directly of RFK Jr.,

00:10:28.920 which is,

00:10:29.780 are you afraid

00:10:30.260 you'll get assassinated?

00:10:31.300 Somebody must have

00:10:35.000 asked the question,

00:10:36.200 but I feel like most people

00:10:37.620 would be too afraid

00:10:38.360 to ask it,

00:10:39.240 even though it's the main

00:10:41.000 question on our minds.

00:10:42.280 It's the one

00:10:42.760 everybody's thinking about.

00:10:44.900 And so Joe Rogan

00:10:45.680 just asked the question,

00:10:47.060 are you afraid, basically?

00:10:49.080 You know,

00:10:49.360 you've said the intel people

00:10:50.980 killed JFK.

00:10:53.980 Are you afraid 0.66

00:10:54.500 they'll do it to you?

00:10:55.160 And he said

00:10:57.020 he's not afraid,

00:10:58.440 but he does take

00:10:59.300 precaution.

00:11:01.300 What kind of precaution

00:11:02.220 could you take?

00:11:03.880 Does he have a food taster

00:11:05.080 already?

00:11:06.260 I mean,

00:11:06.620 how much could you

00:11:07.300 actually do

00:11:08.160 if the CIA 0.62

00:11:09.060 wanted to kill you?

00:11:10.800 Do you think 1.00

00:11:11.240 you could block them?

00:11:14.220 You know,

00:11:14.660 the CIA's trying 0.89

00:11:15.580 to kill me, 0.78

00:11:16.280 but I got me 0.99

00:11:17.800 a ring doorbell.

00:11:20.020 So,

00:11:20.780 I feel like

00:11:21.720 I'm in pretty good shape

00:11:22.900 here.

00:11:23.100 What exactly

00:11:25.360 could you do?

00:11:26.700 Yeah,

00:11:26.960 I guess Castro did it.

00:11:28.280 You'd have to have

00:11:28.780 body doubles.

00:11:30.380 I think you'd need

00:11:30.960 about 35 body doubles

00:11:32.440 just to

00:11:33.060 get your odds

00:11:34.380 down to normal.

00:11:36.720 All right,

00:11:37.460 we know more

00:11:38.220 about my new hero.

00:11:40.060 I call him

00:11:40.720 the Fox News

00:11:42.200 Chiron guy 0.99

00:11:43.100 because we don't

00:11:44.280 know his name.

00:11:45.780 And you know

00:11:46.220 the story

00:11:46.640 that the Fox News

00:11:47.700 Chiron guy 0.99

00:11:48.480 put up a

00:11:49.960 little

00:11:50.880 label at the

00:11:52.560 bottom of the

00:11:53.080 Fox News

00:11:53.620 report

00:11:54.260 when Trump

00:11:55.560 was being

00:11:55.900 reigned

00:11:56.300 that said

00:11:56.860 wannabe

00:11:57.700 dictator

00:11:58.300 arrests

00:11:58.960 political

00:11:59.460 rival.

00:12:02.580 Now,

00:12:03.160 I speculated

00:12:04.000 and hoped,

00:12:04.800 it was more

00:12:05.200 hoping than

00:12:05.760 speculating,

00:12:06.700 that it was

00:12:08.180 done as a

00:12:08.860 parody of

00:12:10.460 CNN and

00:12:11.180 MSNBC

00:12:11.860 because that's

00:12:12.700 sort of like

00:12:13.060 a parody

00:12:13.460 of their

00:12:13.800 coverage.

00:12:15.260 And it turns

00:12:15.760 out,

00:12:16.180 I don't think

00:12:16.920 it was a

00:12:17.280 parody,

00:12:18.400 although it

00:12:18.900 could have

00:12:19.200 also been a

00:12:20.060 parody,

00:12:20.760 right?

00:12:20.940 But that

00:12:21.300 wasn't the

00:12:21.720 main

00:12:22.040 purpose.

00:12:23.760 Apparently,

00:12:24.960 so this is

00:12:26.340 what I heard

00:12:26.780 from,

00:12:28.080 you know,

00:12:28.660 somebody who

00:12:29.760 has access

00:12:30.280 to knowledge,

00:12:31.100 right?

00:12:32.460 And I don't

00:12:33.140 know if it's

00:12:33.480 true,

00:12:33.980 I'm just

00:12:35.540 telling you

00:12:35.880 what I was

00:12:36.240 told.

00:12:37.320 So you

00:12:37.700 could put

00:12:38.020 whatever level

00:12:38.720 of credibility

00:12:39.320 on that you

00:12:40.000 want.

00:12:41.640 And by the

00:12:42.320 way,

00:12:42.480 this was not

00:12:43.080 from any

00:12:43.740 employee of

00:12:44.620 Fox News.

00:12:45.360 So what I'm

00:12:46.560 going to tell

00:12:46.900 you comes

00:12:47.940 from a

00:12:48.420 non-Fox

00:12:49.280 News person.

00:12:50.900 But the

00:12:51.420 story is

00:12:51.940 that when

00:12:53.260 Tucker quit,

00:12:56.160 allegedly,

00:12:57.260 management asked

00:12:58.300 people to

00:12:58.780 take sides,

00:13:00.060 and they

00:13:00.280 said,

00:13:00.560 if you're

00:13:00.740 on Tucker's

00:13:01.320 side,

00:13:02.400 tell us and

00:13:02.940 we'll walk

00:13:03.440 you out now.

00:13:04.980 And I think

00:13:05.580 some people

00:13:05.980 did,

00:13:06.340 and they

00:13:06.600 got walked

00:13:06.980 out,

00:13:07.500 or potentially

00:13:08.460 they did.

00:13:08.940 I don't

00:13:09.120 know the

00:13:09.400 details.

00:13:10.700 But this

00:13:11.640 one Fox

00:13:14.340 News Chiron

00:13:15.940 hero is

00:13:17.820 allegedly one

00:13:18.620 of Tucker's

00:13:19.320 ex-producers.

00:13:22.140 Does that

00:13:22.660 get more

00:13:22.960 interesting now?

00:13:25.200 Yeah,

00:13:25.540 no,

00:13:26.280 I'm telling

00:13:26.800 you,

00:13:26.960 my source

00:13:27.400 is not

00:13:27.920 a Fox

00:13:28.740 News employee.

00:13:29.740 I know

00:13:29.960 you're going

00:13:30.400 to guess,

00:13:30.820 it's not

00:13:31.160 him.

00:13:33.540 And so

00:13:35.660 apparently

00:13:36.000 this senior

00:13:37.240 Fox News

00:13:38.040 producer

00:13:38.640 stayed long

00:13:40.360 enough to

00:13:41.020 figure out

00:13:43.740 what was

00:13:44.040 going on,

00:13:44.720 and maybe

00:13:46.440 collect some

00:13:47.020 information.

00:13:49.340 Apparently,

00:13:50.100 this was his

00:13:50.860 final act

00:13:52.320 before he

00:13:52.820 left.

00:13:54.120 So while

00:13:54.600 technically he

00:13:55.480 was fired,

00:13:56.800 apparently that

00:13:57.440 was the plan.

00:13:58.880 So it looks

00:13:59.540 like he was

00:13:59.920 trying to get

00:14:00.400 fired and he

00:14:00.960 was done

00:14:02.440 with the

00:14:03.980 network and

00:14:04.880 he went out

00:14:05.300 in style.

00:14:06.240 Now,

00:14:06.560 I happen to

00:14:07.240 be a really

00:14:08.540 big fan

00:14:09.380 of resigning

00:14:11.680 in a

00:14:13.160 spectacular

00:14:13.680 fashion.

00:14:15.360 Very big

00:14:15.940 fan of that.

00:14:17.560 And so

00:14:18.240 the fact

00:14:18.600 that he

00:14:18.860 did this

00:14:19.280 play on

00:14:19.880 his way

00:14:20.260 out,

00:14:21.060 he will

00:14:21.360 always be

00:14:21.880 my hero.

00:14:23.160 I so

00:14:24.020 want to

00:14:24.380 know his

00:14:24.760 name,

00:14:25.400 or her

00:14:25.780 name,

00:14:26.300 I'm assuming

00:14:27.120 a gender,

00:14:27.940 I shouldn't

00:14:28.200 be doing

00:14:28.500 that.

00:14:29.260 So he

00:14:29.840 or her,

00:14:31.580 I would

00:14:32.380 like to

00:14:32.680 know who

00:14:32.960 this is

00:14:33.360 because that's

00:14:33.740 my new

00:14:34.080 hero.

00:14:35.620 I absolutely

00:14:36.460 want to be

00:14:37.040 this person's

00:14:37.640 friend.

00:14:38.520 I want to

00:14:38.900 be their

00:14:39.160 friend.

00:14:39.460 That's

00:14:40.780 it.

00:14:41.400 Anybody

00:14:41.700 who could

00:14:42.080 do this

00:14:42.480 is my

00:14:42.820 friend.

00:14:44.020 I don't

00:14:44.340 care what

00:14:44.640 else is

00:14:44.940 going on.

00:14:48.120 So that's

00:14:48.980 fun.

00:14:51.280 Did you

00:14:51.860 see Matt

00:14:52.400 Walsh's

00:14:53.100 Twitter thread

00:14:54.180 about what

00:14:55.820 Fox News

00:14:56.580 is teaching

00:14:58.600 its employees

00:14:59.420 about Pride

00:15:00.860 Month?

00:15:01.140 I don't

00:15:03.140 even know

00:15:04.060 how to

00:15:04.300 describe it.

00:15:06.400 But apparently

00:15:07.040 the required

00:15:08.300 Fox News

00:15:09.440 propaganda

00:15:11.160 for their

00:15:11.820 own employees

00:15:12.540 about Pride

00:15:13.220 Month is

00:15:14.180 just jaw

00:15:14.780 dropping.

00:15:16.780 I don't

00:15:17.600 even know

00:15:17.900 how to

00:15:18.200 describe it.

00:15:19.460 It's

00:15:19.860 hard not

00:15:21.940 to call

00:15:22.360 it insane.

00:15:24.740 Right?

00:15:25.120 It looks

00:15:25.760 so far

00:15:26.560 beyond what

00:15:28.320 any reasonable

00:15:29.220 person would

00:15:29.860 think is

00:15:30.400 appropriate in

00:15:31.280 any situation.

00:15:32.780 And I'm

00:15:33.220 not being

00:15:33.620 a prude.

00:15:35.300 Right?

00:15:35.760 I'm not

00:15:36.320 saying,

00:15:37.220 you know, 0.86

00:15:38.000 straight sex 0.97

00:15:38.700 is good 0.97

00:15:39.120 and gay 0.99

00:15:39.580 sex is 1.00

00:15:39.980 bad.

00:15:40.300 Nothing

00:15:40.500 like that.

00:15:41.460 Nothing

00:15:41.720 like that.

00:15:42.640 You know,

00:15:42.960 among adults,

00:15:43.720 whatever,

00:15:44.100 whatever.

00:15:45.120 But how

00:15:48.480 did such

00:15:48.960 a small

00:15:49.540 group of

00:15:50.080 people end

00:15:51.680 up with so

00:15:52.320 much control

00:15:53.100 over our

00:15:53.620 lives?

00:15:54.580 It's such a

00:15:55.560 small group

00:15:56.100 of people.

00:15:57.780 Why are

00:15:58.420 their problems

00:15:59.080 greater than

00:15:59.860 every other

00:16:01.200 category on

00:16:01.920 earth?

00:16:02.200 things like

00:16:03.640 you don't

00:16:03.900 think fat

00:16:05.020 people and 1.00

00:16:05.620 sick people

00:16:06.400 and, you

00:16:07.560 know, people

00:16:08.140 with different

00:16:08.620 abilities and

00:16:09.660 you don't

00:16:11.360 think there's

00:16:11.820 like a

00:16:12.160 million categories

00:16:13.080 of people 1.00

00:16:13.540 with fucking 1.00

00:16:14.040 issues or 0.99

00:16:15.520 special, let's

00:16:16.420 say not

00:16:16.880 issues, but

00:16:17.460 let's say

00:16:17.760 special

00:16:18.640 situations.

00:16:20.180 It's like you

00:16:21.060 could slice

00:16:21.940 the population

00:16:23.640 up into a

00:16:25.580 million different

00:16:26.540 aggrieved groups

00:16:27.880 and they would

00:16:28.420 all have a

00:16:28.840 point.

00:16:29.780 Every one of

00:16:30.360 them would

00:16:30.580 have a

00:16:30.880 point.

00:16:32.140 And if you

00:16:32.580 listen to it,

00:16:33.140 you say, well,

00:16:33.620 that's a pretty

00:16:33.960 good point.

00:16:35.680 But why is

00:16:36.760 one group the

00:16:38.380 only one that

00:16:39.000 we have to

00:16:39.700 look at and

00:16:40.920 care about and

00:16:41.660 have a month?

00:16:43.500 How many

00:16:44.100 months are

00:16:44.700 there?

00:16:45.620 So we know

00:16:46.060 we got Black

00:16:46.720 History Month,

00:16:47.980 but I think we

00:16:49.040 got that one

00:16:49.620 honestly, wouldn't

00:16:51.200 you say?

00:16:52.080 Black History

00:16:52.780 Month, I mean,

00:16:54.100 there was

00:16:54.440 slavery.

00:16:56.380 I feel like the

00:16:57.360 country came on

00:16:58.200 that one honestly,

00:16:59.140 meaning, yeah,

00:17:00.620 we should note

00:17:01.920 that.

00:17:02.680 You don't want

00:17:03.140 to forget that.

00:17:04.380 But Pride

00:17:05.300 Month, and

00:17:07.840 again, this is

00:17:08.620 nothing against

00:17:09.380 the LGBTQ

00:17:10.320 community, which

00:17:11.940 I am a big

00:17:12.820 supporter of.

00:17:14.080 I love my

00:17:14.960 LGBTQs.

00:17:16.800 But why does

00:17:18.420 anybody need a

00:17:19.120 month?

00:17:20.440 Again, like I

00:17:21.160 said, slavery is

00:17:22.240 the special case.

00:17:25.020 Ah.

00:17:25.180 Well, it's

00:17:27.960 an interesting

00:17:28.940 situation, and

00:17:30.000 no doubt we're

00:17:31.200 reaching the

00:17:31.720 peak of it.

00:17:33.360 All right, here's

00:17:34.260 a story that I

00:17:35.480 swear to God is

00:17:36.380 like Groundhog

00:17:37.160 Day.

00:17:37.860 Every time I

00:17:38.760 think this story

00:17:39.540 has already been

00:17:40.220 reported, I

00:17:42.320 learned that it

00:17:43.080 wasn't exactly.

00:17:45.520 Can anybody

00:17:46.240 give me a

00:17:47.500 Groundhog Day

00:17:48.540 kind of a

00:17:50.640 clarification here?

00:17:51.660 How many times

00:17:53.380 have we been

00:17:54.100 told that we

00:17:54.680 found out that

00:17:55.560 the virus really

00:17:58.760 did come from

00:17:59.560 the Wuhan lab?

00:18:01.480 Am I wrong

00:18:02.420 that every few

00:18:03.960 months I wake

00:18:04.640 up to the same

00:18:05.280 story, as if we

00:18:06.800 didn't know, but

00:18:08.240 now we just

00:18:08.840 learned it?

00:18:10.800 I thought we

00:18:11.760 didn't know and

00:18:12.380 then just learned

00:18:13.040 it at least six

00:18:13.740 different times.

00:18:15.160 How many times

00:18:16.020 do we have to

00:18:16.700 pretend we didn't

00:18:18.300 know and then

00:18:18.960 just found out,

00:18:19.960 and now there's

00:18:21.400 another one?

00:18:22.920 Now, this is the

00:18:23.880 worst of all,

00:18:24.820 right?

00:18:25.380 And I think Matt

00:18:26.700 Taibbi and Michael

00:18:27.760 Schellenberger are 1.00

00:18:28.720 on this case,

00:18:29.900 doing the research,

00:18:30.940 and another person

00:18:31.820 whose name I

00:18:32.340 tragically forget.

00:18:34.080 So there's somebody

00:18:34.720 else who needs

00:18:35.520 credit that I just

00:18:36.280 forgot their name.

00:18:39.360 But apparently the

00:18:40.560 first three people

00:18:41.540 infected with the

00:18:42.460 virus were

00:18:43.100 employees of the

00:18:44.080 lab.

00:18:46.300 Wait.

00:18:47.740 What?

00:18:48.220 The first three

00:18:53.620 people infected

00:18:54.540 were employees

00:18:55.580 of the

00:18:56.080 we're going to

00:18:57.520 infect you with

00:18:58.200 a virus lab?

00:19:01.900 How long have

00:19:02.860 we known this?

00:19:05.540 How long have

00:19:06.460 we known that?

00:19:08.080 And then part of

00:19:08.740 the reporting is

00:19:09.440 that, you know,

00:19:10.740 FBI Director

00:19:12.180 Christopher Wray

00:19:13.040 said that they've

00:19:16.820 known for a long

00:19:17.540 time it was the

00:19:18.200 lab, that the

00:19:19.600 FBI has known

00:19:20.260 for a long

00:19:20.740 time.

00:19:23.140 Did we know

00:19:23.920 that?

00:19:24.720 I mean, but

00:19:26.000 just give me a

00:19:27.980 fact check.

00:19:30.900 Have we not

00:19:31.500 gone through the

00:19:32.140 cycle of not

00:19:33.280 knowing and then

00:19:33.940 knowing like six

00:19:34.760 times?

00:19:35.940 How many times

00:19:36.860 do we have to

00:19:37.400 find out once

00:19:38.100 again it really

00:19:39.020 was the Wuhan

00:19:40.580 lab?

00:19:41.100 I don't know

00:19:41.420 what's going on

00:19:41.920 here.

00:19:42.080 I'm actually

00:19:42.440 confused about

00:19:43.940 why we ever

00:19:44.840 thought it wasn't

00:19:45.660 them.

00:19:46.720 Whoever thought

00:19:47.380 it wasn't?

00:19:49.080 You know, I've

00:19:49.620 told you the

00:19:50.120 story that before

00:19:53.640 you'd ever, before

00:19:54.900 you ever heard

00:19:55.660 there was a lab, I

00:19:57.900 already knew it

00:19:58.420 was the lab.

00:19:59.540 Have I told you

00:20:00.100 that story?

00:20:01.040 Before you ever

00:20:01.740 knew there was a

00:20:02.560 lab there, I had

00:20:05.100 privately in a

00:20:06.100 private conversation

00:20:06.960 seen the, seen

00:20:09.720 where the lab was

00:20:10.740 and where the wet

00:20:11.560 market was.

00:20:13.380 It's like right

00:20:14.280 across the street

00:20:15.240 and the name of

00:20:17.900 it, like I think

00:20:19.360 Guff Hill has said

00:20:20.540 this and I think

00:20:21.480 John Stewart has

00:20:23.020 said this, the

00:20:24.760 name is like right

00:20:26.300 on the door, you

00:20:27.040 know, the

00:20:28.040 infectious disease

00:20:29.420 lab or whatever.

00:20:31.880 And the day that

00:20:33.300 somebody showed that

00:20:34.080 to me, I look at

00:20:35.400 the lab and I

00:20:36.200 thought, well,

00:20:37.500 that's not a 0.98

00:20:38.180 fucking coincidence. 0.98

00:20:40.060 Of course it came 1.00

00:20:40.880 from there.

00:20:41.300 So I knew that

00:20:42.940 before, and trust

00:20:44.840 me, everybody in

00:20:47.000 the government

00:20:47.440 probably knew from

00:20:49.700 day one.

00:20:51.160 Because all they

00:20:51.700 had to do is know

00:20:52.360 where the lab was

00:20:53.300 and that was the

00:20:53.860 end of the story.

00:20:54.860 All you needed to

00:20:55.880 know is where the

00:20:57.340 lab was.

00:20:58.120 That's it.

00:20:58.960 And then you would

00:20:59.540 know the whole

00:20:59.960 story.

00:21:01.160 And it turns out it

00:21:01.880 was exactly what it

00:21:02.640 looked like.

00:21:04.080 All right, let me

00:21:04.960 talk about the

00:21:05.840 Mar-a-Lago

00:21:08.020 documents and the

00:21:09.380 sock drawer defense.

00:21:11.300 And I've been

00:21:13.640 trying to figure

00:21:14.260 out the two

00:21:15.580 movies on one

00:21:16.460 screen.

00:21:17.580 You're aware of

00:21:18.460 one movie that

00:21:19.460 says Trump will

00:21:20.340 definitely be cleared

00:21:21.480 of all charges

00:21:22.200 because the

00:21:23.400 Clinton sock drawer

00:21:24.540 case basically

00:21:26.600 sets a precedent

00:21:27.560 that he can take

00:21:28.960 what he wants.

00:21:30.420 You've heard that,

00:21:31.200 right?

00:21:32.080 And then I see

00:21:34.140 tweets from the

00:21:34.900 left that say

00:21:36.040 those people who

00:21:37.240 believe that are

00:21:39.140 hallucinating and 1.00

00:21:40.300 stupid and they're 1.00

00:21:42.260 silly. 1.00

00:21:43.560 But I never saw a 0.99

00:21:44.720 reason.

00:21:46.040 Like, everybody

00:21:46.600 would just say 1.00

00:21:47.140 you're stupid and 1.00

00:21:48.100 you're silly. 1.00

00:21:49.340 And I'm like, 1.00

00:21:49.940 and?

00:21:50.720 And?

00:21:51.540 Why does the

00:21:52.400 sock drawer defense

00:21:53.300 not work?

00:21:54.620 Because?

00:21:55.300 Can you give me

00:21:55.900 any reasons?

00:21:56.360 So I had to do a

00:21:57.760 deep dive today in

00:21:58.820 the fake fact

00:21:59.820 checking world of

00:22:00.820 PolitiFact and all

00:22:02.240 those places.

00:22:03.260 And of course,

00:22:04.600 all of the top

00:22:05.460 search results,

00:22:06.400 if you Google it,

00:22:07.800 all of the top

00:22:08.980 search results say

00:22:10.440 the sock drawer 1.00

00:22:11.220 defense is bullshit. 1.00

00:22:12.780 Did you know that? 1.00

00:22:14.480 Do you know if you

00:22:15.120 Google it, all the

00:22:16.540 top results say it's 1.00

00:22:17.620 bullshit. 1.00

00:22:19.040 But do you know 1.00

00:22:19.820 why?

00:22:20.180 This will be a

00:22:23.340 test to your

00:22:23.800 bubble.

00:22:24.680 And by the way,

00:22:25.380 I'm very guilty of

00:22:26.320 this, so I'm doing

00:22:28.080 my mea culpa here.

00:22:30.080 So I actually

00:22:30.840 believed some of the

00:22:31.720 things I heard about

00:22:32.480 that is sock drawer

00:22:33.280 defense.

00:22:35.400 None of it's true.

00:22:37.680 Did you know that?

00:22:38.820 The whole sock drawer

00:22:39.780 thing is complete 1.00

00:22:40.560 bullshit. 1.00

00:22:42.080 How many of you do 1.00

00:22:42.980 that?

00:22:44.940 I'm going to tell

00:22:45.660 you why in a

00:22:46.180 moment.

00:22:48.380 First of all,

00:22:49.100 that the sock drawer

00:22:50.460 was not about the

00:22:51.480 government versus

00:22:52.420 Bill Clinton.

00:22:53.560 Did you know that?

00:22:55.140 I thought the

00:22:56.000 government had an

00:22:57.920 issue with Bill

00:22:58.580 Clinton, and then

00:22:59.540 the courts worked

00:23:00.580 it out, and then

00:23:01.880 Bill Clinton was

00:23:02.660 shown to be right

00:23:03.440 because simply by

00:23:04.600 taking the stuff

00:23:05.880 that was good

00:23:06.960 enough to say it

00:23:07.620 was personal.

00:23:08.520 So there you go.

00:23:10.160 So he can just

00:23:10.780 take anything he

00:23:11.420 wants, and it

00:23:11.920 applies to Trump

00:23:12.960 too.

00:23:13.780 All right, so the

00:23:14.320 first thing you need

00:23:15.160 to know is that it

00:23:15.740 was never the

00:23:16.300 government against

00:23:17.500 Clinton.

00:23:19.100 It was Judicial

00:23:20.260 Watch, a private

00:23:22.420 organization.

00:23:23.400 They were suing to

00:23:24.580 try to get access to

00:23:25.740 the private tapes

00:23:27.340 under the theory

00:23:28.760 that they weren't

00:23:29.400 private.

00:23:30.960 But then the

00:23:31.780 court said there's

00:23:33.320 nobody whose job it

00:23:34.360 is to decide what's

00:23:35.520 private or not, and

00:23:37.100 therefore the court

00:23:37.880 cannot decide that

00:23:39.020 they are or are not

00:23:39.960 private.

00:23:41.260 I just ruined that

00:23:42.560 explanation totally.

00:23:43.500 But let's see, the

00:23:44.920 summary of that is a

00:23:47.180 private organization

00:23:48.160 wanted access to the

00:23:49.140 tapes, and the court

00:23:50.460 says we don't really

00:23:51.600 have any control over

00:23:52.540 that.

00:23:53.500 So no.

00:23:55.980 But that has nothing

00:23:56.940 to do with the Trump

00:23:57.740 situation.

00:23:59.120 So here's where I was

00:24:00.440 getting confused by all

00:24:02.180 the defenses and the

00:24:03.520 claims, all right?

00:24:04.540 And I think I'll bet

00:24:05.740 most of you are

00:24:06.440 confused about the

00:24:07.320 same thing.

00:24:08.280 And this clarification

00:24:09.480 might be the first time

00:24:10.740 you understand what's

00:24:11.700 going on.

00:24:12.520 Maybe.

00:24:12.940 That's my...

00:24:13.600 So my goal is that

00:24:14.560 this will be the first

00:24:15.360 time you understand

00:24:16.180 what's going on.

00:24:17.060 Because the two bubbles

00:24:18.160 are not talking, right?

00:24:19.900 There is no...

00:24:21.540 There's almost no

00:24:22.340 contact whatsoever.

00:24:24.380 And I also saw the

00:24:25.660 Wall Street Journal

00:24:26.320 article where the

00:24:27.800 lawyer who lost the

00:24:29.420 Clinton sock drawer

00:24:30.600 case said, oh, yeah,

00:24:32.760 I'm the expert on this

00:24:34.200 situation.

00:24:35.660 I lost the case trying

00:24:37.480 to get access to him.

00:24:39.040 And so I can tell you

00:24:40.020 for sure that

00:24:41.500 Trump is not in

00:24:43.200 trouble because I'm

00:24:44.640 an expert in this

00:24:45.380 very thing.

00:24:47.380 However, that expert

00:24:50.580 is a partisan.

00:24:52.280 And so when the

00:24:52.820 expert says, I know

00:24:53.840 everything about this

00:24:54.700 and here's my opinion,

00:24:56.020 you're getting a very

00:24:57.300 partisan opinion.

00:24:58.900 All right, this is not

00:24:59.600 somebody who's trying

00:25:00.320 to tell you, you know,

00:25:02.040 the full situation.

00:25:04.560 Now, that's not fair

00:25:05.580 of me.

00:25:06.440 I'm just making that

00:25:07.720 assumption based on

00:25:08.580 association with an

00:25:10.460 entity that has a, you

00:25:11.980 know, a definite

00:25:12.560 political place in the

00:25:14.680 world, right?

00:25:15.460 They're not trying to be

00:25:16.540 objective, in my opinion.

00:25:19.280 You know, they have more

00:25:20.460 of a political agenda.

00:25:22.400 So here's the big

00:25:25.280 clarification.

00:25:25.840 There are two issues,

00:25:28.240 not one.

00:25:29.560 One issue is how does a

00:25:31.140 president declare that

00:25:32.520 something is personal?

00:25:33.580 Personal is different

00:25:36.280 than confidential.

00:25:38.180 So there are two paths,

00:25:39.760 and this is why we're

00:25:40.640 confused.

00:25:41.960 One path is about what

00:25:43.280 is classified, and how

00:25:45.180 do you make it

00:25:45.680 unclassified?

00:25:46.860 That is a separate

00:25:47.800 question from what is

00:25:49.380 personal.

00:25:51.800 Does that make sense?

00:25:53.440 So the standard for the

00:25:55.340 sock drawer case was about

00:25:56.880 what was personal.

00:25:59.900 It was about what was

00:26:01.020 personal.

00:26:01.400 The Clinton situation is

00:26:03.860 about what was classified.

00:26:06.900 Those are not the same.

00:26:08.600 So a sock drawer case

00:26:10.020 gives you, not only does it

00:26:11.480 give you no precedent, but

00:26:13.660 apparently from a legal

00:26:14.980 standpoint, it's not a, it's

00:26:16.440 not a binding precedent, if

00:26:18.460 binding is the right word.

00:26:19.700 It's not a precedent that any

00:26:21.240 court needs to look at.

00:26:23.000 Nobody needs to look at that

00:26:24.420 as a precedent.

00:26:25.720 So there is no precedent that

00:26:27.860 has any legal weight.

00:26:28.980 There is just something that

00:26:30.740 happened, which is

00:26:31.500 different.

00:26:32.880 And so here's what I think is

00:26:37.280 the fact of it.

00:26:43.940 A president can, all right, so

00:26:47.240 here's my best understanding.

00:26:49.260 A president can make any

00:26:50.560 document unclassified, but not

00:26:54.220 personal.

00:26:56.140 So, so Trump does have the

00:26:58.300 right, I believe, to

00:27:00.460 declassify anything, because

00:27:02.020 he's the president, and that

00:27:04.320 his argument might be, and I

00:27:05.920 think this would be the better

00:27:07.260 part of the argument, that the

00:27:09.000 act of removing it is a clear

00:27:11.740 indication of declassification.

00:27:14.840 Now, he might win that and he

00:27:16.360 might not, but I think that's a

00:27:17.540 strong argument, that the mere

00:27:19.600 removing of them is a clear

00:27:22.160 intention to declassify.

00:27:24.720 I don't know, maybe a jury

00:27:25.740 buys that, maybe not, but I

00:27:26.960 can't see 12 people not

00:27:29.140 agreeing.

00:27:30.520 I mean, it might be a mixed 1.00

00:27:31.820 jury, but I can't see 12

00:27:33.680 people saying, no, he doesn't

00:27:34.960 have that capability or right.

00:27:37.720 However, here's my

00:27:39.000 understanding that I need a

00:27:40.100 fact check on.

00:27:43.600 Even if something's personal,

00:27:46.080 it's not necessarily owned by

00:27:47.760 the president.

00:27:48.240 This is where it gets weird.

00:27:53.060 So apparently, on day one, when

00:27:56.400 a material is presented or

00:27:58.500 created, you're supposed to

00:27:59.940 designate it personal or

00:28:01.260 government on day one.

00:28:04.400 Right?

00:28:05.020 So if you do that, everything

00:28:07.100 goes well, and there's no

00:28:09.040 problem later.

00:28:10.880 On day one, we said this was

00:28:12.260 personal, we filled out the

00:28:13.700 form, it's been personal from

00:28:15.720 day one.

00:28:16.560 So then that's fine.

00:28:18.100 You can keep that.

00:28:19.480 But what if there's something

00:28:20.480 that didn't get classified that

00:28:22.000 way as personal, and then

00:28:23.880 later on, the president wants

00:28:26.220 to claim it as personal, because

00:28:27.880 hey, just look at it.

00:28:29.720 Just look at it.

00:28:30.640 These are obviously personal.

00:28:32.700 Right?

00:28:33.300 So then who gets to decide?

00:28:35.500 Well, the question, I think

00:28:38.680 Judicial Watch wanted the

00:28:40.220 courts to decide, and the

00:28:41.420 courts basically said that's

00:28:43.160 not their job.

00:28:43.900 And there's no standard for

00:28:46.360 that.

00:28:47.220 So I think I'm butchering the

00:28:50.100 legal descriptions here, so

00:28:51.480 you should all know that

00:28:52.360 that's the case.

00:28:53.440 But the basic idea here is

00:28:55.020 don't confuse a president's

00:28:57.400 ability to make something a

00:28:58.740 personal document, which I

00:29:00.140 don't think they have the

00:29:00.840 right.

00:29:02.100 I don't think the president

00:29:03.020 can just say after the fact

00:29:04.520 it's personal.

00:29:05.780 But there is also nobody else

00:29:07.460 who can do it.

00:29:09.120 Isn't that weird?

00:29:10.440 It's just a black hole.

00:29:11.700 If you don't do it on day

00:29:13.540 one, there's nobody's job it

00:29:16.020 is later to say, oh, this

00:29:18.120 was wrong, this was actually

00:29:19.160 personal.

00:29:21.600 So I think what we have here,

00:29:24.120 which makes me think that

00:29:25.500 Trump will not have the

00:29:28.160 prison time for this, I think

00:29:30.160 what we have here is a

00:29:31.100 situation sufficiently

00:29:32.380 complicated that a jury is

00:29:34.380 going to have a tough time

00:29:35.200 with it.

00:29:36.280 And if the jury has a tough

00:29:37.580 time with it, I don't know

00:29:38.680 how they find guilty.

00:29:39.560 Because it would just be too

00:29:41.600 hard to hold it in their

00:29:42.480 heads.

00:29:43.240 There's just too many

00:29:43.840 variables here.

00:29:46.100 So I don't know what's

00:29:47.900 going to happen, but to me

00:29:50.560 it looks like it's a big old

00:29:51.560 confusing case as opposed to

00:29:54.180 something where Trump was

00:29:55.460 doing something illegal.

00:29:59.360 It looks like just confusion

00:30:00.880 over who had rights, and if

00:30:02.700 that's all it is, I don't think

00:30:04.340 people go to prison for that.

00:30:05.560 So my overall feeling is that

00:30:08.580 the legal system will not put

00:30:10.700 him in jail, but I could be

00:30:13.720 surprised.

00:30:16.020 All right, Peggy Noonan is

00:30:18.020 writing about Trump, making

00:30:19.320 sure that we buy into the

00:30:22.060 summer hoax.

00:30:22.980 Now the summer hoax is that

00:30:24.560 somehow we magically know that

00:30:27.340 the documents in those boxes are

00:30:29.500 not just classified, which is the

00:30:31.580 one part we do know, but

00:30:33.300 dangerous, dangerous to the

00:30:35.920 country.

00:30:38.280 Now, nobody's claiming that any

00:30:40.460 of that information got out in

00:30:43.260 any way that was dangerous.

00:30:45.020 So there's no victim.

00:30:47.140 They still have to make it look

00:30:48.600 like it's terrible after the

00:30:50.640 fact when there's no victim.

00:30:53.980 Now, if you're talking about it

00:30:55.600 before these documents had been

00:30:57.580 secured, you said, oh, we've got

00:30:59.800 all these maybe sensitive documents

00:31:01.860 that are unsecured.

00:31:03.380 I would say, act right away.

00:31:06.000 Let's do something to secure those

00:31:07.640 documents.

00:31:08.220 Who did that? 0.91

00:31:09.180 Who is to blame?

00:31:10.980 But it's already over.

00:31:12.660 The documents are secured.

00:31:15.720 There's no risk now.

00:31:17.680 And apparently there was

00:31:19.240 no exposure then.

00:31:21.700 So there's no alleged victim

00:31:23.280 whatsoever.

00:31:23.800 But they've got to make this the

00:31:26.480 biggest story of the summer

00:31:27.420 because it's all they got.

00:31:28.360 So Peggy Noonan writes this piece

00:31:32.540 in the Wall Street Journal to try

00:31:33.800 to make that case.

00:31:35.780 And in her own writing, she

00:31:37.260 referenced something she said in

00:31:38.620 the past about Trump and entering

00:31:41.200 the Weimar Republic phase.

00:31:44.540 That's right.

00:31:45.420 A Hitler reference.

00:31:47.500 So here's a person who is writing

00:31:49.160 an article which you are supposed

00:31:51.100 to gain some wisdom and insight by

00:31:53.360 reading her opinion.

00:31:54.200 And you know that before you even

00:31:56.460 hear the opinion about the

00:31:57.540 documents, that she is at one

00:31:59.720 time gone full Hitler in her 0.87

00:32:03.000 understanding of Trump.

00:32:05.660 Now, is there anything else you need

00:32:07.240 to listen to from this individual?

00:32:09.140 I think that's completely

00:32:10.260 disqualifying.

00:32:11.640 If you've ever referred to Trump

00:32:14.820 in a serious way as, oh, Weimar

00:32:17.120 Republic, next Hitler, dictator, 0.96

00:32:20.380 authoritarian.

00:32:20.880 It's just disqualifying.

00:32:23.600 Because you know at that point

00:32:24.760 that they're not even trying.

00:32:26.900 They're not even trying to be

00:32:28.460 useful or helpful.

00:32:30.800 So she goes on with a bunch of

00:32:33.480 twaddle about how dangerous these

00:32:35.060 documents might be that we've never

00:32:36.580 seen.

00:32:39.560 Here's a sentence from her.

00:32:41.240 You can't get more serious, more

00:32:43.520 breathtaking on a charge against a

00:32:46.400 former president.

00:32:47.180 The documents have to do with the

00:32:50.020 most essential of our security

00:32:51.980 interests.

00:32:52.980 They're about how we keep our

00:32:54.740 country safe from military attack.

00:32:58.940 Are they?

00:33:00.260 Are they, Peggy?

00:33:02.200 Which ones did you get to read?

00:33:05.260 Yeah?

00:33:05.820 Which ones did you get to read?

00:33:07.780 Because I didn't get to read any of

00:33:09.180 them.

00:33:10.100 And I don't believe that they're

00:33:12.280 important or sensitive or that they

00:33:14.320 matter at all.

00:33:14.940 Do I believe that one of them might

00:33:17.280 reference an attack plan on another

00:33:19.940 country?

00:33:20.880 Sure.

00:33:22.060 Maybe.

00:33:23.280 Maybe.

00:33:24.340 Do I think that that attack plan would

00:33:26.040 actually make a difference to anybody

00:33:29.000 if they saw it?

00:33:30.760 What do you think an executive level

00:33:32.700 attack plan looks like?

00:33:35.800 Let's say it's Iran. 0.96

00:33:37.220 We don't know that, but let's say it is.

00:33:39.000 Let's say it was an attack plan for

00:33:40.740 Iran.

00:33:41.580 Do you think Iran would learn anything 1.00

00:33:43.240 from that, the executive summary of the

00:33:45.900 attack plan?

00:33:47.160 Well, the first wave would be an air

00:33:49.360 attack and we'd use all our good

00:33:51.060 weapons and missiles.

00:33:52.640 Because they didn't know that.

00:33:54.820 They didn't know that we first would

00:33:56.660 do an air attack with missiles and try

00:33:59.620 to do it from a distance.

00:34:01.180 They didn't see that coming.

00:34:04.620 They didn't see that our intelligence

00:34:06.520 in the country to, you know, arm them.

00:34:10.580 I never saw that coming.

00:34:14.460 What could possibly be in an Iran 0.99

00:34:17.000 attack document that Iran would not 0.54

00:34:19.360 consider completely obvious?

00:34:21.920 The whole point of having a gigando

00:34:24.140 army, military, is that you can attack

00:34:28.700 anybody of that size and you pretty much

00:34:31.040 know you're going to win because you've

00:34:32.680 got the big military that can do all the

00:34:34.360 things that you put on that memo.

00:34:35.540 But everybody else knows it, too.

00:34:38.460 Everybody knows how the attacks look.

00:34:42.320 You know, suppose they say stuff like,

00:34:44.540 oh, we're going to do a lightning attack

00:34:46.720 to try to take Tehran.

00:34:49.360 What happens when the actual war starts?

00:34:52.920 Because the other thing that we know is

00:34:54.380 that war plans only last until the first

00:34:57.220 shot.

00:34:57.980 And then you have to alter.

00:35:00.280 So basically, what we imagine we're doing

00:35:03.900 on day one is going to be whatever they

00:35:05.900 teach in the war colleges.

00:35:07.840 It's going to be like all the obvious

00:35:09.480 attack stuff.

00:35:10.860 And then that would be infinitely tweaked

00:35:13.080 if any real war happened.

00:35:15.260 So what is it that Iran would learn from 0.88

00:35:17.340 that?

00:35:18.280 Probably nothing.

00:35:19.720 Probably nothing.

00:35:21.180 Because like I said, it would be an

00:35:22.480 executive summary.

00:35:24.020 What would the president be seeing?

00:35:25.860 Is he going to see a list of our assets?

00:35:27.640 Is he going to see we will put, you know,

00:35:30.780 X number of tanks into the theater or

00:35:32.840 whatever?

00:35:33.220 We wouldn't.

00:35:33.700 I don't think we'd use tanks.

00:35:35.420 But I don't know.

00:35:37.120 I just can't imagine what it would be

00:35:38.820 that it wouldn't make any difference.

00:35:41.340 So is it serious and breathtaking?

00:35:47.300 Does it talk about U.S. nuclear programs?

00:35:49.940 Oh, no.

00:35:51.540 Oh, no.

00:35:52.380 All right, here's one.

00:35:54.680 When it talks about the U.S.

00:35:56.360 nuclear program.

00:35:58.560 Did they say weapons?

00:36:01.920 Have you ever once asked yourself this

00:36:03.800 question?

00:36:04.580 All the reporting I see is about our

00:36:06.660 quote, nuclear program.

00:36:10.120 How do you know that means weapons?

00:36:13.420 Couldn't it be that we plan to build a

00:36:15.020 bunch of nuclear reactors if we can?

00:36:21.060 Yeah.

00:36:21.780 Why doesn't it mean energy?

00:36:24.320 I don't know.

00:36:24.800 Well, I mean, it could.

00:36:26.820 Are you telling me that, you know, there's

00:36:29.040 no chance that it could just be about

00:36:30.800 nuclear energy?

00:36:32.900 It might be.

00:36:35.420 Now, I think it's more likely that it's about

00:36:37.260 nuclear weapons, of course.

00:36:38.960 But we don't know anything.

00:36:40.680 About potential vulnerabilities of the U.S.

00:36:43.800 Really?

00:36:44.200 Do you think somebody gave the president a

00:36:47.180 document about our potential vulnerabilities

00:36:49.280 and he took it with him?

00:36:53.060 I don't believe that.

00:36:55.560 Not intentionally.

00:36:57.800 Like, a document that if our enemies saw it,

00:37:01.200 they could destroy our country?

00:37:02.740 Do you think he just threw that in the box

00:37:06.220 with the other stuff?

00:37:07.480 I don't think so.

00:37:09.300 I mean, I get that it's potentially true.

00:37:11.700 It doesn't seem likely.

00:37:14.700 And plans for possible retaliation,

00:37:17.920 again, which would be totally generic,

00:37:19.820 in my opinion.

00:37:22.040 All right.

00:37:23.100 So we've seen this movie before.

00:37:25.280 So here's how the movie plays.

00:37:27.340 We're going to spend all summer long,

00:37:29.240 because it's a slow-news summer.

00:37:30.960 It's always slow news.

00:37:32.320 And all summer long,

00:37:33.900 the news will try to make us guess

00:37:35.720 what's in those boxes.

00:37:37.280 And they'll use so many words like

00:37:39.720 serious and breathtaking

00:37:41.540 that you'll start to think

00:37:43.260 there's something bad in those boxes.

00:37:45.260 Which, by the way, there might be.

00:37:48.520 But we've seen the movie too many times.

00:37:51.620 And the movie goes like this.

00:37:53.380 Oh, those boxes have so many secrets in them.

00:37:56.600 Secrets of the worst possible kind.

00:37:59.260 All right.

00:37:59.740 Maybe there are not a lot of secrets,

00:38:01.880 but there's at least two or three really bad.

00:38:05.240 Okay.

00:38:05.540 Not two or three secrets,

00:38:07.180 but one of those things in there was really...

00:38:09.360 Okay.

00:38:09.600 It wasn't what you thought it was.

00:38:11.940 And that happens approximately

00:38:13.480 two years after the event.

00:38:16.340 Right?

00:38:17.460 It's a two-year lag.

00:38:19.400 Two years from hoax to unveiling hoax.

00:38:21.880 It's the same pattern every time.

00:38:24.160 So all that matters is

00:38:25.480 they can spend the entire summer

00:38:26.820 talking about the things you can't see.

00:38:29.580 And, you know,

00:38:30.060 if you could see the things you can't see,

00:38:32.180 boy, would you feel bad.

00:38:34.620 Whoa.

00:38:35.580 Whoa.

00:38:36.180 Would you hate Trump

00:38:37.060 if you could see the things

00:38:38.220 that nobody can see.

00:38:39.820 Right?

00:38:40.720 Now, if you could see the things

00:38:42.100 that you can see,

00:38:43.720 Trump looks pretty good.

00:38:46.360 You know, compared to Biden.

00:38:47.540 But, if you could see the things

00:38:50.740 you can't see,

00:38:53.200 well, can we agree

00:38:53.940 that if you could see

00:38:54.820 the things we can't see,

00:38:56.480 you'd be seeing some stuff.

00:38:58.660 Oh, what you would be seeing

00:39:00.040 if you couldn't see

00:39:00.760 the things you can see.

00:39:02.960 But the things you can see

00:39:04.440 look fine.

00:39:07.980 But, oh, those things you can't see.

00:39:10.960 All right.

00:39:11.740 Ukraine is turning into a joke. 1.00

00:39:13.780 You know, all the news is bullshit. 1.00

00:39:17.460 I think one of the generals said 0.99

00:39:19.620 that all those pictures

00:39:21.260 of destroyed Ukrainian tanks

00:39:23.620 are this...

00:39:25.560 He thinks it might be

00:39:26.780 the same group of five tanks

00:39:28.220 that they photograph

00:39:28.920 from different angles.

00:39:31.400 Now, I don't think

00:39:32.260 that's quite true.

00:39:33.520 But, obviously,

00:39:34.420 some of that is going on.

00:39:36.100 Right?

00:39:36.740 Some exaggeration of losses

00:39:39.200 on both sides.

00:39:40.680 But, have you seen the map?

00:39:43.780 Of how much land

00:39:45.580 has changed hands

00:39:47.160 since the offensive started,

00:39:49.180 the counteroffensive?

00:39:52.940 None.

00:39:54.340 Basically none.

00:39:56.140 So, the entire counteroffensive,

00:39:57.840 which is definitely,

00:39:59.660 oh, yeah,

00:40:00.180 it's losing a lot of men,

00:40:01.340 but they're making

00:40:01.960 sure but slow progress.

00:40:05.160 And then today,

00:40:05.840 I learned,

00:40:06.800 it might take several months

00:40:08.160 of probing the defenses

00:40:10.100 before they find the place

00:40:11.380 they break through.

00:40:12.080 Sure, that's convenient.

00:40:16.240 It's going to take you

00:40:17.040 several months

00:40:17.920 probing those,

00:40:19.800 probing those defenses

00:40:21.240 until you find the place

00:40:23.160 you can break through.

00:40:26.540 Oh, Nancy Dill.

00:40:28.920 Let me take care of Nancy. 1.00

00:40:31.180 Nancy, you fell for 1.00

00:40:32.100 the 4chan hoax. 1.00

00:40:33.860 You poor, poor, stupid cunt. 1.00

00:40:36.460 You fell for the 4chan hoax 1.00

00:40:38.180 about me and my pandemic opinions.

00:40:40.340 You poor girl. 0.97

00:40:42.940 Poor girl. 1.00

00:40:44.720 Can we all say,

00:40:45.560 poor Nancy Dill. 1.00

00:40:47.120 She believes anything.

00:40:48.900 So gullible.

00:40:50.080 You're so gullible.

00:40:51.700 You're adorable.

00:40:53.640 So Nancy's my new mascot.

00:40:55.700 We're going to call her

00:40:56.680 Clot Dill.

00:40:59.060 Mrs. Clot.

00:41:02.000 And continue on.

00:41:04.680 All right.

00:41:05.040 That probably got me

00:41:07.480 demonetized.

00:41:09.260 Totally worth it.

00:41:12.460 You know my opinion

00:41:13.720 about the Ukraine war.

00:41:17.020 That it's really just

00:41:18.080 a big negotiation

00:41:19.000 at this point.

00:41:19.980 Because there's not much land

00:41:21.380 that's going to change hands.

00:41:22.740 And they just need to

00:41:23.600 beat each other up

00:41:24.360 until somebody's willing

00:41:25.220 to talk peace.

00:41:26.020 So I looked on CNN today

00:41:29.440 looking for news.

00:41:31.200 And I read all over

00:41:32.200 the top and everything

00:41:33.240 and there wasn't any news.

00:41:35.460 I mean there were

00:41:36.160 headlines.

00:41:37.740 But none of it

00:41:38.400 looked like news

00:41:40.420 of any importance

00:41:41.180 to anybody.

00:41:42.520 Because it's summer.

00:41:43.620 Right?

00:41:43.800 It's not really their fault.

00:41:44.740 It's just summer.

00:41:45.760 And there's not much news.

00:41:47.660 But there was one

00:41:48.520 headline

00:41:51.040 that looked like

00:41:52.760 it was news.

00:41:53.820 And the headline

00:41:54.400 was something about

00:41:55.240 along the lines of

00:41:56.420 Putin was looking

00:41:58.720 for any way out

00:42:00.020 of the Ukraine situation.

00:42:02.840 Now that would be

00:42:04.260 interesting story

00:42:05.760 wouldn't it?

00:42:06.520 Because that would

00:42:07.100 sort of suggest

00:42:08.140 he's ready to negotiate

00:42:09.400 which would be

00:42:10.780 the biggest story

00:42:12.080 there is.

00:42:13.200 So I clicked

00:42:14.060 on that link

00:42:14.780 that said that

00:42:15.640 Putin

00:42:16.200 might be open

00:42:18.200 to anything

00:42:18.680 to end the war.

00:42:20.400 And after I clicked

00:42:21.320 on the link

00:42:21.800 it went to a different story.

00:42:23.040 The only thing

00:42:25.240 on the CNN page

00:42:26.340 that I thought

00:42:26.820 was interesting

00:42:27.500 that was worth

00:42:28.780 clicking on

00:42:29.400 it was a bad link.

00:42:31.880 True story.

00:42:33.120 It was the only thing

00:42:34.360 that looked interesting

00:42:35.160 and it was a bad link.

00:42:36.660 It went to the wrong story.

00:42:39.660 So that's all

00:42:40.420 you need to know

00:42:41.000 about CNN's

00:42:43.000 news gathering ability.

00:42:45.140 Well we almost

00:42:45.840 had a story

00:42:46.400 but we couldn't

00:42:47.140 get the link.

00:42:47.880 All right

00:42:51.860 I had a little

00:42:52.380 incident in

00:42:53.080 Starbucks yesterday.

00:42:54.360 Some of you

00:42:54.800 watched my live stream

00:42:55.740 yesterday.

00:42:56.600 You know that

00:42:57.140 I had been up

00:42:58.040 the night before

00:42:58.700 with food poisoning

00:43:00.980 and hadn't slept

00:43:01.900 all night.

00:43:03.440 And

00:43:03.780 sometimes my

00:43:05.700 temper

00:43:06.420 is not as easily

00:43:09.080 controllable

00:43:09.840 if I haven't slept.

00:43:11.960 It's a thing.

00:43:13.340 So I was in food

00:43:14.100 I was in

00:43:14.680 Starbucks

00:43:15.180 and I thought

00:43:17.100 I might have

00:43:17.800 just enough energy

00:43:18.760 to do

00:43:20.140 a good solid

00:43:21.080 hour of work

00:43:21.980 today.

00:43:22.440 You know

00:43:22.560 creative work.

00:43:24.080 And

00:43:24.560 I have like

00:43:25.840 five deadlines

00:43:26.620 at the moment

00:43:27.200 because I'm trying

00:43:27.840 to put together

00:43:28.480 two books

00:43:29.520 you know

00:43:29.940 a new one

00:43:30.640 and a reissue

00:43:31.800 looking

00:43:32.620 trying to get

00:43:33.240 audio books done

00:43:34.640 I've got

00:43:35.160 you know

00:43:36.020 the local stuff

00:43:37.360 I've got this

00:43:38.200 I get twice a day.

00:43:39.720 So I have something

00:43:40.080 like five deadlines

00:43:41.120 a day

00:43:41.520 roughly speaking.

00:43:44.080 And

00:43:44.440 I go

00:43:45.700 into Starbucks

00:43:46.740 tired and cranky

00:43:48.760 I sit down

00:43:50.040 and there's only

00:43:50.840 three people

00:43:51.480 in the Starbucks

00:43:52.420 customers.

00:43:55.660 All three of us

00:43:56.680 have laptops

00:43:57.360 clearly we all

00:43:58.900 came there to work.

00:44:00.520 Guy behind me

00:44:01.480 pulls out his cell phone

00:44:02.480 and starts making a call.

00:44:04.560 No problem.

00:44:05.720 People make phone calls

00:44:06.940 from Starbucks

00:44:07.400 all the time.

00:44:08.560 And it's usually

00:44:09.060 something like

00:44:09.860 you know

00:44:10.920 oh I'll be home

00:44:11.660 in 15 minutes

00:44:12.480 or did you

00:44:13.880 get my email.

00:44:15.860 Right.

00:44:16.500 This guy decides

00:44:17.480 to make it very long

00:44:18.500 and what was

00:44:19.100 obviously going to be

00:44:20.400 a lengthy

00:44:21.900 loud phone call

00:44:22.940 right behind me

00:44:24.120 in a place

00:44:25.640 with only three people.

00:44:27.200 And it's me

00:44:27.600 on my laptop

00:44:28.420 obviously trying to work

00:44:30.340 and he's doing

00:44:31.380 the phone call.

00:44:32.960 So the first thing

00:44:33.920 I say to myself

00:44:34.680 is well

00:44:35.380 there's no law

00:44:37.140 that says

00:44:37.620 he can't do that.

00:44:38.540 Right.

00:44:38.660 There's no sign

00:44:39.460 there's no

00:44:40.080 there's no guideline.

00:44:42.440 So

00:44:42.760 it's just my problem.

00:44:45.980 Right.

00:44:46.100 It's just something

00:44:46.660 bothering me.

00:44:47.940 This is not about

00:44:48.640 it's not about him

00:44:49.580 I'm telling myself.

00:44:52.040 And I try to work

00:44:53.380 and I couldn't

00:44:54.260 I couldn't even

00:44:56.040 see the laptop

00:44:57.060 because

00:44:58.700 my vision

00:44:59.900 started turning red

00:45:00.960 because I was

00:45:02.920 getting

00:45:03.220 more and more angry.

00:45:06.120 And I was saying

00:45:06.720 this on the

00:45:07.360 I did a live stream

00:45:08.480 from the man cave

00:45:09.480 last night

00:45:10.040 so I said

00:45:10.560 some of this.

00:45:11.820 I first did

00:45:12.820 the three look around

00:45:14.620 technique

00:45:16.160 which I'm going

00:45:17.780 to model for you

00:45:18.520 some of you

00:45:19.120 have seen it.

00:45:20.460 So he was behind me

00:45:21.700 but facing my direction.

00:45:23.660 So the first look around

00:45:24.740 you just keep

00:45:25.740 a neutral expression.

00:45:27.580 You know

00:45:27.700 like maybe you were

00:45:28.320 just looking

00:45:28.680 for something else.

00:45:31.500 And then

00:45:32.200 the point of that

00:45:33.560 is that he would think

00:45:34.500 oh

00:45:34.980 is this guy

00:45:35.580 looking at me

00:45:36.100 because I'm on my phone?

00:45:37.120 but there would be

00:45:38.580 some ambiguity there

00:45:39.780 because maybe

00:45:40.540 I was just looking

00:45:41.180 at something else.

00:45:42.600 But maybe on his own

00:45:43.900 he would think

00:45:44.920 oh shoot

00:45:45.580 he might have been

00:45:46.440 looking at me

00:45:46.960 because I'm on my phone

00:45:47.760 I better make this short.

00:45:49.440 But that didn't

00:45:50.120 make any difference.

00:45:51.300 He was clearly

00:45:51.960 engaged in a long

00:45:53.360 phone call.

00:45:54.380 So then I had to do

00:45:55.060 the second look around

00:45:56.060 and you know

00:45:57.020 the second look around

00:45:57.940 you add a little attitude.

00:46:00.540 So that one

00:46:00.980 looks like this.

00:46:01.680 Got that one?

00:46:08.020 Yeah it's the stink eye.

00:46:09.080 It's the stink eye.

00:46:10.220 But the stink eye

00:46:11.180 didn't make any

00:46:11.740 difference either.

00:46:14.180 I went for the

00:46:15.200 full turnaround.

00:46:18.360 So next I had to go.

00:46:26.200 Full turnaround

00:46:27.020 no difference.

00:46:29.420 Just continued

00:46:30.240 with this phone call.

00:46:32.120 So now I said to myself

00:46:33.380 well

00:46:33.680 I'm not going to

00:46:36.420 make a thing about this.

00:46:38.220 I'm just going to

00:46:38.920 pack up my laptop

00:46:39.760 and call it a day

00:46:40.780 and I'm just going to

00:46:41.860 write the day off

00:46:42.680 and literally

00:46:43.180 I'm going to go back to bed.

00:46:45.700 Because

00:46:46.060 this is not a fight

00:46:48.160 I need.

00:46:49.340 It's not like

00:46:50.060 I'm some kind of Karen.

00:46:51.800 You know

00:46:52.000 it's not like

00:46:53.180 I'm going to cause

00:46:53.720 a scene in a public place.

00:46:57.020 So as I was

00:46:57.880 packing up my laptop

00:46:58.740 I was feeling my

00:46:59.820 willpower

00:47:01.320 and self-control

00:47:02.280 if you imagine

00:47:03.400 it's starting at 100%.

00:47:04.740 It already was down

00:47:05.980 to about 75%.

00:47:07.460 But that's plenty.

00:47:09.860 And that's a lot

00:47:10.380 of willpower

00:47:10.860 75%.

00:47:11.780 No problem.

00:47:12.820 But as I was

00:47:13.540 getting ready

00:47:14.700 to gather up

00:47:15.860 my garbage

00:47:16.360 to throw it away

00:47:17.120 I feel it

00:47:18.300 crossed the 50% 0.91

00:47:19.700 threshold

00:47:20.160 and I still

00:47:21.280 wasn't gone.

00:47:21.940 and I thought

00:47:23.780 uh-oh.

00:47:27.400 And then it

00:47:27.900 kept dropping.

00:47:29.260 It hit about

00:47:29.620 25%,

00:47:30.440 10%

00:47:31.000 and I thought 1.00

00:47:31.540 oh shit. 1.00

00:47:37.080 I'm about 1.00

00:47:37.780 five seconds away

00:47:38.840 from Hulk

00:47:39.460 smash

00:47:40.120 and I don't

00:47:41.700 have

00:47:41.960 anywhere to

00:47:42.540 stop it.

00:47:43.080 so a conversation

00:47:47.740 ensued.

00:47:50.660 You didn't

00:47:51.460 enjoy it.

00:47:54.960 I went

00:47:55.740 full Karen.

00:47:56.340 I think

00:48:00.140 I don't remember

00:48:01.200 everything I said

00:48:02.120 because sometimes

00:48:02.900 when you get angry

00:48:03.720 you don't remember

00:48:04.280 what you said

00:48:04.820 but I do remember

00:48:06.620 this part

00:48:07.200 and it went

00:48:08.560 like this.

00:48:10.260 Of this entire

00:48:11.440 neighborhood

00:48:11.940 there is only

00:48:13.040 one place

00:48:13.760 you shouldn't

00:48:14.200 be making

00:48:14.580 that phone call.

00:48:15.720 Right there.

00:48:16.880 Right where you are.

00:48:17.940 This is the only

00:48:18.700 place

00:48:19.100 you should not

00:48:19.840 be doing that.

00:48:21.880 But he told me

00:48:22.700 that was my opinion.

00:48:23.540 Now I tweeted

00:48:27.840 about it

00:48:28.320 because I wanted

00:48:28.780 to see other

00:48:29.240 people's opinions.

00:48:30.420 I was wondering

00:48:31.260 if other people

00:48:32.000 would say

00:48:32.380 hey live

00:48:33.040 and let live

00:48:33.740 there's no rule

00:48:35.040 against making

00:48:35.560 a phone call.

00:48:37.900 But here's my

00:48:38.780 take on this

00:48:39.380 and of course

00:48:40.140 I've owned

00:48:40.840 a couple of

00:48:41.220 restaurants

00:48:41.640 so I'm

00:48:42.520 triggered by

00:48:43.240 cell phones

00:48:44.160 in restaurants.

00:48:45.360 There is no

00:48:46.580 situation

00:48:47.260 where using

00:48:48.640 your phone

00:48:49.220 where other

00:48:49.740 people are

00:48:50.500 in a social

00:48:51.240 situation

00:48:51.920 is okay.

00:48:54.120 It's not

00:48:54.940 okay in the

00:48:55.420 movie theater.

00:48:56.300 It's not

00:48:57.040 okay in the

00:48:57.520 restaurant.

00:48:58.540 I understand

00:48:59.580 that people

00:49:00.220 do make

00:49:00.720 phone calls

00:49:01.340 more often

00:49:02.280 as Starbucks.

00:49:03.900 I get that.

00:49:04.980 But like I said

00:49:05.800 short ones

00:49:07.140 short ones

00:49:08.620 no problem

00:49:09.980 at all.

00:49:11.100 Right.

00:49:11.720 But if you

00:49:12.820 get on there

00:49:13.320 and you stay

00:49:13.920 on there

00:49:14.300 I think you

00:49:14.940 don't understand

00:49:16.020 how much

00:49:17.300 annoying that is.

00:49:18.780 Somebody tried

00:49:19.300 to tell me

00:49:19.720 that the problem

00:49:20.320 was on my end

00:49:21.420 because it really

00:49:22.080 was just an opinion

00:49:22.920 of who was

00:49:23.440 right and

00:49:23.760 wrong,

00:49:23.940 who was

00:49:24.140 wrong.

00:49:24.960 To which I

00:49:25.440 say really

00:49:25.960 would fingernails

00:49:28.640 on a chalkboard

00:49:29.840 be my opinion

00:49:31.580 that it bothers

00:49:32.240 me?

00:49:33.500 Is that an opinion?

00:49:34.420 If I were to 0.99

00:49:35.140 piss on your 1.00

00:49:35.700 fucking salad 1.00

00:49:36.600 is it your 1.00

00:49:38.200 opinion that it

00:49:39.160 doesn't taste

00:49:39.620 good?

00:49:40.680 Is that an

00:49:41.100 opinion?

00:49:42.120 No.

00:49:42.560 Some things

00:49:42.940 are not a 0.99

00:49:43.360 fucking opinion. 0.98

00:49:44.840 Some things 1.00

00:49:45.380 are just cause

00:49:46.040 and effect.

00:49:47.120 And we know

00:49:47.840 from science

00:49:48.900 that listening

00:49:49.920 to one

00:49:50.420 side of

00:49:50.800 a phone

00:49:51.120 call

00:49:51.320 will make 0.99

00:49:51.780 you insane

00:49:52.820 if it's 0.97

00:49:54.740 blocking you

00:49:55.340 from doing

00:49:55.700 what you

00:49:55.980 want to do

00:49:56.340 especially.

00:49:57.300 So there's

00:49:57.860 no doubt

00:49:58.320 about the

00:49:58.860 cause and

00:49:59.340 effect.

00:50:00.500 And if you

00:50:00.920 pretend you

00:50:01.640 don't know

00:50:02.140 that,

00:50:02.720 you're an 1.00

00:50:03.160 asshole. 1.00

00:50:04.360 I'm sorry. 0.99

00:50:05.380 If you

00:50:05.780 pretend you're

00:50:06.460 not aware

00:50:07.180 of how much

00:50:08.220 of a

00:50:08.860 fingers on

00:50:09.880 the chalkboard

00:50:10.480 it is to

00:50:10.900 have a phone

00:50:11.360 call in front

00:50:11.940 of somebody,

00:50:13.400 you are a 1.00

00:50:14.780 fucking 1.00

00:50:15.080 asshole. 1.00

00:50:16.100 And if 1.00

00:50:16.500 this is the

00:50:17.260 first time

00:50:17.640 you're

00:50:17.800 hearing

00:50:18.000 about it,

00:50:20.680 you know,

00:50:21.100 fine.

00:50:22.160 Now I'm

00:50:22.440 going to

00:50:22.700 save one

00:50:25.860 story.

00:50:26.580 Remind me

00:50:27.360 on locals.

00:50:28.880 I'm going

00:50:29.140 to save you

00:50:29.560 one phone

00:50:30.040 call story

00:50:30.520 just for

00:50:30.880 locals.

00:50:32.060 There's

00:50:32.280 one I

00:50:32.580 can't tell

00:50:33.000 in public.

00:50:34.440 All right.

00:50:35.320 But let's

00:50:36.020 just say

00:50:36.460 this phone

00:50:37.860 call in

00:50:38.320 public

00:50:38.620 situation.

00:50:40.800 I've been

00:50:41.400 dealing with

00:50:41.840 this a little

00:50:42.280 bit, so I've

00:50:43.540 got some

00:50:43.820 experience here.

00:50:45.900 Anyway.

00:50:47.260 That, ladies 0.97

00:50:47.820 and gentlemen,

00:50:48.280 is all I

00:50:48.820 wanted to

00:50:49.140 say.

00:50:50.180 Is there

00:50:50.500 anything you'd

00:50:51.060 like to hear

00:50:52.260 about?

00:50:52.660 Was he

00:50:53.180 brown?

00:50:54.080 No, he

00:50:54.520 was a 0.94

00:50:55.360 white frat

00:50:56.160 boy looking

00:50:56.600 guy.

00:50:58.120 Slick back

00:50:58.820 hair.

00:50:59.580 Maybe a

00:50:59.980 real estate

00:51:00.360 guy.

00:51:01.200 I don't

00:51:01.420 know.

00:51:02.920 Not sure.

00:51:04.680 I hope I'm

00:51:05.240 still welcome

00:51:05.700 back in

00:51:06.100 Starbucks.

00:51:08.280 All right.

00:51:08.960 Anything else

00:51:09.540 I forgot?

00:51:12.620 Did I

00:51:13.440 miss any

00:51:14.120 topics?

00:51:17.260 I'll give

00:51:18.700 you the

00:51:18.900 rest of

00:51:19.180 the story

00:51:19.500 on locals.

00:51:23.200 Do you

00:51:23.520 see a

00:51:23.720 take on

00:51:24.420 the

00:51:24.680 Schiff

00:51:25.040 censure

00:51:25.740 might

00:51:26.480 change

00:51:26.820 your

00:51:26.960 mind?

00:51:27.860 I don't

00:51:28.460 think so.

00:51:29.320 There's

00:51:29.760 no way I'd

00:51:30.340 be in

00:51:31.380 favor of

00:51:31.980 a large

00:51:32.780 fine.

00:51:33.860 I just

00:51:34.200 don't want

00:51:35.040 the members

00:51:35.420 of Congress

00:51:35.920 voting fines

00:51:37.360 for each

00:51:37.740 other.

00:51:38.820 I'm just

00:51:39.160 not cool

00:51:39.640 with that.

00:51:40.380 So there's

00:51:40.740 nothing you

00:51:41.140 could tell

00:51:41.440 me that

00:51:41.660 would change

00:51:41.940 my mind

00:51:42.340 on that.

00:51:42.660 I don't

00:51:44.380 think so

00:51:44.760 anyway.

00:51:46.420 All right.

00:51:47.100 We talked

00:51:47.640 about Tucker.

00:51:50.500 MTG was

00:51:51.200 snubbed by

00:51:51.960 Trump on

00:51:52.600 the runway.

00:51:53.180 I don't

00:51:53.360 know anything

00:51:53.680 about that.

00:52:00.340 You know,

00:52:00.860 I don't

00:52:01.060 mind people

00:52:01.520 who talk 0.69

00:52:01.880 too loud

00:52:02.280 in a

00:52:02.560 restaurant.

00:52:03.540 That doesn't

00:52:04.060 bother me

00:52:04.400 too much.

00:52:05.800 I understand

00:52:06.640 why it

00:52:06.960 bothers other

00:52:07.400 people,

00:52:07.920 but personally

00:52:08.560 it doesn't

00:52:08.900 bother me

00:52:09.220 too much.

00:52:11.920 All right.

00:52:13.040 Did he

00:52:13.360 know it

00:52:13.620 was me?

00:52:15.340 Oh,

00:52:15.840 that's a

00:52:16.220 good question.

00:52:17.920 I'm going

00:52:18.520 to say

00:52:19.260 not,

00:52:20.800 because when

00:52:21.400 people know

00:52:21.940 my job,

00:52:22.540 they treat

00:52:22.920 me differently.

00:52:24.360 So he

00:52:25.000 definitely

00:52:25.360 treated me

00:52:25.840 like a

00:52:26.880 Starbucks

00:52:27.420 patron.

00:52:30.140 All right.

00:52:31.180 That's all

00:52:31.760 I've got

00:52:31.920 now,

00:52:32.260 and I

00:52:32.500 will talk

00:52:32.980 to you,

00:52:33.460 YouTube,

00:52:34.700 tomorrow.

00:52:35.540 Thanks for

00:52:35.900 joining.

00:52:36.500 The best

00:52:36.900 live stream

00:52:37.340 ever.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - June 16, 2023

Episode 2141 Scott Adams： Trump Sock Drawer Argument, Fox News Chyron Hero, Canadian Arsonists, More

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript