Real Coffee with Scott Adams - June 16, 2023


Episode 2141 Scott Adams： Trump Sock Drawer Argument, Fox News Chyron Hero, Canadian Arsonists, More


Episode Stats

Length

52 minutes

Words per Minute

147.89174

Word Count

7,783

Sentence Count

594

Misogynist Sentences

10

Hate Speech Sentences

24


Summary

A new kind of hydrogel could solve the world's water problem, and a bunch of other problems, including climate change, AI, and the burning of forests. Plus, a conspiracy theory about what would you do if you woke up one day and realized that your life had a limit.


Transcript

00:00:00.700 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.
00:00:06.520 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and I don't know why the ancients didn't think of it, but here it is now.
00:00:12.580 Lucky, think of it.
00:00:15.080 Millions of years of human evolution, and you happen to be alive at the same time as a simultaneous sip.
00:00:22.440 If you'd like to participate, all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass of tank or chalice or stine, a canteen, jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:30.580 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.
00:00:33.520 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day.
00:00:36.740 The thing that makes everything better is called the simultaneous sip.
00:00:41.060 It happens now. Go.
00:00:47.020 Ah.
00:00:47.460 For those of you in a different time zone, just wait.
00:00:54.260 59 minutes, and you'll be ready.
00:00:57.400 All right.
00:00:59.020 Here's some stories.
00:01:00.240 This one's sort of a repeat, but I like it so much I'm going to tell you.
00:01:04.160 Researchers at MIT have developed this absorbent hydrogel.
00:01:10.760 Have you heard this story?
00:01:13.000 An absorbent hydrogel.
00:01:15.340 And what it does is it sucks moisture out of the air.
00:01:21.220 So you could put this hydrogel in the desert, and it would create drinking water.
00:01:26.740 It just sits there.
00:01:28.260 Now, here's the great part.
00:01:29.980 I believe it's infinitely reusable.
00:01:32.860 It doesn't wear out.
00:01:34.080 It doesn't get waterlogged.
00:01:36.160 It just continues sucking water out of the air, and then you have clean water.
00:01:40.980 Now, what would happen to the world?
00:01:45.780 Oh, and also, apparently it's easy to mass produce it.
00:01:50.860 Did we just solve the entire water problem of the world?
00:01:54.520 Except maybe for agriculture.
00:01:57.480 But would this allow people to live on the ocean?
00:02:02.260 Because this isn't the biggest problem of living in the ocean, getting water, right?
00:02:09.020 You'd use a lot of energy to desalinate.
00:02:12.220 So if you didn't need to use any of your energy to desalinate, could you not live on the ocean?
00:02:18.340 On a big old barge?
00:02:20.840 It really could change everything.
00:02:22.700 The entire nature of how human beings live in the world could be changed by this little hydrogel.
00:02:28.680 Because now you're not bound by water supplies.
00:02:31.860 Humans have been bound by water, access to water forever.
00:02:36.720 What if we're free to that?
00:02:39.900 Interesting, interesting thought.
00:02:41.960 Imagine that at the same time as fusion.
00:02:45.640 Because it always takes 10 years for anything to get big.
00:02:49.900 But suppose we had fusion energy, effectively almost free and infinite.
00:02:55.300 At the same time, we had free and infinite water.
00:02:59.220 The two things that a civilization needs the most to thrive.
00:03:03.540 There are some really good things coming.
00:03:05.560 Until AI kills us all, of course.
00:03:07.720 I mean, that's coming.
00:03:09.040 By the way, in the Dilbert Reborn comic that you can only see if you're a subscriber on Twitter,
00:03:14.060 to my Twitter feed, or if you're on the Locals platform, scottadams.locals.com,
00:03:19.440 you would see that Dilbert's CEO is now testifying to Congress
00:03:24.120 about the dangers of their AI product.
00:03:26.960 So if you want to see Dilbert's CEO testifying to Congress about the dangers of AI,
00:03:33.000 that's how you do it.
00:03:35.400 All right.
00:03:35.700 Apparently, these Canadian wildfires seem to have been set by arsonists.
00:03:44.140 And it appears they have an ongoing Canadian arson problem.
00:03:49.380 And, of course, the question is, is somebody paying these people?
00:03:55.720 Are they environmentalists who are kind of warped,
00:03:59.640 and they think this will make people do something about climate change?
00:04:03.440 Because the news is covering it as a climate change story.
00:04:07.320 It doesn't even seem a little bit like a climate change story.
00:04:10.820 It seems like a giant arson story.
00:04:12.740 But do you think that individuals just sort of wake up one day
00:04:17.780 and a bunch of completely different people say,
00:04:20.800 you know what would be fun?
00:04:22.640 Has anybody ever thought of burning down a forest?
00:04:25.140 And then they go and do it?
00:04:27.360 Well, there's something going on,
00:04:30.160 and it might be just a psychological effect.
00:04:32.220 I don't necessarily see a grand Chinese plot behind any of it,
00:04:38.260 but maybe.
00:04:40.240 I mean, if I were China and I were trying to destroy North America,
00:04:44.960 I would do it with matches.
00:04:47.820 So I don't know if they've figured that out yet,
00:04:50.820 but they will.
00:04:54.180 Well, Joe Rogan's sort of a, you know,
00:04:56.820 his importance in our society continues.
00:05:00.600 And I feel like he's calling a top.
00:05:05.500 You know, I've done this before,
00:05:07.060 but nobody's believing me yet,
00:05:08.700 so I'll just keep saying it until it's true.
00:05:11.000 That wokeness, like everything else, has a limit.
00:05:14.560 And I think we reached our wokeness limit.
00:05:17.600 And the way that you can tell
00:05:19.040 is that people can say aloud
00:05:21.540 things you couldn't say even a year ago.
00:05:25.120 You can just say it.
00:05:27.340 Here's what Joe Rogan said.
00:05:29.900 He said he would vote for Trump over Biden
00:05:32.820 because Biden's, you know, mentally gone, basically.
00:05:37.420 And Biden's cabinet is a, quote,
00:05:41.880 fucking sideshow of diversity.
00:05:44.760 It's people you wouldn't hire to run a Ben and Jerry's.
00:05:47.840 Now, how long ago was it?
00:05:54.520 Was it one year ago
00:05:56.120 that you wouldn't see somebody like Joe Rogan
00:05:59.540 say they would vote for Trump, first of all?
00:06:03.400 Is that news?
00:06:05.240 That feels like news.
00:06:07.480 That he would say right out loud,
00:06:09.780 no ambiguity,
00:06:11.280 if it's those two, I'm going to vote for Trump
00:06:13.180 because one of them doesn't have a brain.
00:06:14.980 I don't think you could say that a year ago.
00:06:18.660 But he says it, you know,
00:06:19.900 without anything held back.
00:06:22.640 But then he goes after the diversity hires in the cabinet.
00:06:27.780 Is it only because he's Joe Rogan
00:06:29.940 that he can say that?
00:06:31.940 Could the rest of us say
00:06:33.020 the diversity hires are destroying the country?
00:06:35.080 By the way, I have no reason to believe they are.
00:06:41.100 I don't have any special knowledge
00:06:43.520 that these cabinet members
00:06:45.480 are worse than other cabinet members.
00:06:47.860 I mean, I always think cabinet members
00:06:49.180 are just clowns anyway.
00:06:51.180 Does anybody take cabinet members seriously?
00:06:55.440 You know, maybe Secretary of State,
00:06:57.160 then you're done, right?
00:06:58.840 But don't we have a long history
00:07:03.040 of putting political cronies in cabinet positions?
00:07:08.400 I mean, is Pete Buttigieg
00:07:10.080 the cabinet head of transportation
00:07:13.340 because of all of his transportation experience?
00:07:16.980 Or is it just like it always is?
00:07:19.900 You know, everybody's just getting
00:07:21.120 their little rewards and stuff.
00:07:23.700 Yeah, so I would challenge Joe Rogan
00:07:27.400 on the basic question
00:07:28.520 of whether we've ever had
00:07:30.500 competent cabinet members
00:07:32.560 beyond Secretary of State.
00:07:34.900 We probably do pretty good
00:07:36.140 with state and maybe energy.
00:07:39.140 But after that,
00:07:40.060 I think it's just political stuff.
00:07:42.800 So, but anyway,
00:07:43.820 the point is not so much about the cabinet.
00:07:45.540 The point is more that
00:07:46.980 Joe Rogan can say that out loud.
00:07:49.280 And I believe there will be no penalty.
00:07:52.080 I believe there will be no penalty
00:07:53.580 for anything he said about that.
00:07:55.920 What do you think?
00:07:57.400 Do you think a corner has been turned?
00:08:00.160 And I think the
00:08:01.160 the individual stealing the dresses
00:08:05.920 from the airport
00:08:07.020 probably had a lot to do with
00:08:08.580 how people feel about the cabinet.
00:08:11.320 And then Buttigieg is,
00:08:13.100 you know,
00:08:13.500 had some issues.
00:08:16.000 I don't know that Buttigieg
00:08:17.160 is doing a bad job, by the way.
00:08:19.140 I wouldn't know.
00:08:20.040 How would anybody know?
00:08:20.860 You know, there were a few
00:08:22.200 high-profile things
00:08:23.600 where people said
00:08:24.500 he went to Palestine
00:08:26.760 and he wore his good shoes.
00:08:29.520 Everybody should know
00:08:30.480 not to wear your good shoes
00:08:31.760 to the disaster zone.
00:08:34.120 All right.
00:08:35.500 Okay.
00:08:36.800 He's a gay guy with good footwear.
00:08:39.700 Are we really holding that against him?
00:08:42.380 A gay guy with good footwear.
00:08:45.100 Okay.
00:08:46.020 I mean, if that's the worst you have,
00:08:47.760 I'm not going to worry too much
00:08:49.120 about his performance.
00:08:51.980 Anyway, I'm not saying
00:08:52.940 he's doing a good job.
00:08:53.960 I'm saying we can't tell.
00:08:55.900 Is that clear?
00:08:56.980 I'm not supporting him.
00:08:58.600 I'm just saying,
00:08:59.180 how would you know
00:08:59.720 if he's doing a good or bad job?
00:09:01.460 The stuff that's in the news
00:09:02.880 is also propagandized.
00:09:04.540 You can't really tell
00:09:05.260 if he's doing a good or bad job.
00:09:07.780 You really can't.
00:09:08.500 All right.
00:09:11.680 Joe Rogan also had...
00:09:13.480 Well, I have one more question.
00:09:15.160 When Joe Rogan said
00:09:16.580 that Ben & Jerry's...
00:09:18.580 that the cabinet members
00:09:20.520 couldn't run a Ben & Jerry's,
00:09:22.740 somebody tweeted
00:09:24.520 that Ben & Jerry's is so woke
00:09:26.200 their Burlington, Vermont flagship
00:09:28.920 scoop shop
00:09:29.820 has a
00:09:30.980 we must dismantle
00:09:32.420 white supremacy sign
00:09:33.880 in the window.
00:09:34.400 So, you get your ice cream
00:09:38.200 and your politics
00:09:38.900 in the same place.
00:09:40.200 We must dismantle
00:09:41.180 white supremacy.
00:09:42.860 Now, I have a question
00:09:43.940 for Ben & Jerry's.
00:09:46.780 Do they still sell vanilla?
00:09:53.040 Anybody?
00:09:57.000 That's actually a real question.
00:09:59.180 Do they sell vanilla?
00:10:03.060 They do?
00:10:04.400 I'm going to have to see it
00:10:05.380 because I don't believe you.
00:10:08.080 I don't believe
00:10:08.780 they sell vanilla ice cream.
00:10:11.580 All right.
00:10:12.080 Well, I'm going to have to see proof.
00:10:13.340 I don't believe it.
00:10:14.780 I think they've got to
00:10:15.680 dismantle that stuff.
00:10:17.620 Well, Joe Rogan
00:10:19.360 also had RFK Jr. on
00:10:20.620 and he asked him directly...
00:10:22.860 This is why we love Joe Rogan, right?
00:10:25.500 Has anybody asked this question
00:10:27.080 directly of RFK Jr.,
00:10:28.920 which is,
00:10:29.780 are you afraid
00:10:30.260 you'll get assassinated?
00:10:31.300 Somebody must have
00:10:35.000 asked the question,
00:10:36.200 but I feel like most people
00:10:37.620 would be too afraid
00:10:38.360 to ask it,
00:10:39.240 even though it's the main
00:10:41.000 question on our minds.
00:10:42.280 It's the one
00:10:42.760 everybody's thinking about.
00:10:44.900 And so Joe Rogan
00:10:45.680 just asked the question,
00:10:47.060 are you afraid, basically?
00:10:49.080 You know,
00:10:49.360 you've said the intel people
00:10:50.980 killed JFK.
00:10:53.980 Are you afraid
00:10:54.500 they'll do it to you?
00:10:55.160 And he said
00:10:57.020 he's not afraid,
00:10:58.440 but he does take
00:10:59.300 precaution.
00:11:01.300 What kind of precaution
00:11:02.220 could you take?
00:11:03.880 Does he have a food taster
00:11:05.080 already?
00:11:06.260 I mean,
00:11:06.620 how much could you
00:11:07.300 actually do
00:11:08.160 if the CIA
00:11:09.060 wanted to kill you?
00:11:10.800 Do you think
00:11:11.240 you could block them?
00:11:14.220 You know,
00:11:14.660 the CIA's trying
00:11:15.580 to kill me,
00:11:16.280 but I got me
00:11:17.800 a ring doorbell.
00:11:20.020 So,
00:11:20.780 I feel like
00:11:21.720 I'm in pretty good shape
00:11:22.900 here.
00:11:23.100 What exactly
00:11:25.360 could you do?
00:11:26.700 Yeah,
00:11:26.960 I guess Castro did it.
00:11:28.280 You'd have to have
00:11:28.780 body doubles.
00:11:30.380 I think you'd need
00:11:30.960 about 35 body doubles
00:11:32.440 just to
00:11:33.060 get your odds
00:11:34.380 down to normal.
00:11:36.720 All right,
00:11:37.460 we know more
00:11:38.220 about my new hero.
00:11:40.060 I call him
00:11:40.720 the Fox News
00:11:42.200 Chiron guy
00:11:43.100 because we don't
00:11:44.280 know his name.
00:11:45.780 And you know
00:11:46.220 the story
00:11:46.640 that the Fox News
00:11:47.700 Chiron guy
00:11:48.480 put up a
00:11:49.960 little
00:11:50.880 label at the
00:11:52.560 bottom of the
00:11:53.080 Fox News
00:11:53.620 report
00:11:54.260 when Trump
00:11:55.560 was being
00:11:55.900 reigned
00:11:56.300 that said
00:11:56.860 wannabe
00:11:57.700 dictator
00:11:58.300 arrests
00:11:58.960 political
00:11:59.460 rival.
00:12:02.580 Now,
00:12:03.160 I speculated
00:12:04.000 and hoped,
00:12:04.800 it was more
00:12:05.200 hoping than
00:12:05.760 speculating,
00:12:06.700 that it was
00:12:08.180 done as a
00:12:08.860 parody of
00:12:10.460 CNN and
00:12:11.180 MSNBC
00:12:11.860 because that's
00:12:12.700 sort of like
00:12:13.060 a parody
00:12:13.460 of their
00:12:13.800 coverage.
00:12:15.260 And it turns
00:12:15.760 out,
00:12:16.180 I don't think
00:12:16.920 it was a
00:12:17.280 parody,
00:12:18.400 although it
00:12:18.900 could have
00:12:19.200 also been a
00:12:20.060 parody,
00:12:20.760 right?
00:12:20.940 But that
00:12:21.300 wasn't the
00:12:21.720 main
00:12:22.040 purpose.
00:12:23.760 Apparently,
00:12:24.960 so this is
00:12:26.340 what I heard
00:12:26.780 from,
00:12:28.080 you know,
00:12:28.660 somebody who
00:12:29.760 has access
00:12:30.280 to knowledge,
00:12:31.100 right?
00:12:32.460 And I don't
00:12:33.140 know if it's
00:12:33.480 true,
00:12:33.980 I'm just
00:12:35.540 telling you
00:12:35.880 what I was
00:12:36.240 told.
00:12:37.320 So you
00:12:37.700 could put
00:12:38.020 whatever level
00:12:38.720 of credibility
00:12:39.320 on that you
00:12:40.000 want.
00:12:41.640 And by the
00:12:42.320 way,
00:12:42.480 this was not
00:12:43.080 from any
00:12:43.740 employee of
00:12:44.620 Fox News.
00:12:45.360 So what I'm
00:12:46.560 going to tell
00:12:46.900 you comes
00:12:47.940 from a
00:12:48.420 non-Fox
00:12:49.280 News person.
00:12:50.900 But the
00:12:51.420 story is
00:12:51.940 that when
00:12:53.260 Tucker quit,
00:12:56.160 allegedly,
00:12:57.260 management asked
00:12:58.300 people to
00:12:58.780 take sides,
00:13:00.060 and they
00:13:00.280 said,
00:13:00.560 if you're
00:13:00.740 on Tucker's
00:13:01.320 side,
00:13:02.400 tell us and
00:13:02.940 we'll walk
00:13:03.440 you out now.
00:13:04.980 And I think
00:13:05.580 some people
00:13:05.980 did,
00:13:06.340 and they
00:13:06.600 got walked
00:13:06.980 out,
00:13:07.500 or potentially
00:13:08.460 they did.
00:13:08.940 I don't
00:13:09.120 know the
00:13:09.400 details.
00:13:10.700 But this
00:13:11.640 one Fox
00:13:14.340 News Chiron
00:13:15.940 hero is
00:13:17.820 allegedly one
00:13:18.620 of Tucker's
00:13:19.320 ex-producers.
00:13:22.140 Does that
00:13:22.660 get more
00:13:22.960 interesting now?
00:13:25.200 Yeah,
00:13:25.540 no,
00:13:26.280 I'm telling
00:13:26.800 you,
00:13:26.960 my source
00:13:27.400 is not
00:13:27.920 a Fox
00:13:28.740 News employee.
00:13:29.740 I know
00:13:29.960 you're going
00:13:30.400 to guess,
00:13:30.820 it's not
00:13:31.160 him.
00:13:33.540 And so
00:13:35.660 apparently
00:13:36.000 this senior
00:13:37.240 Fox News
00:13:38.040 producer
00:13:38.640 stayed long
00:13:40.360 enough to
00:13:41.020 figure out
00:13:43.740 what was
00:13:44.040 going on,
00:13:44.720 and maybe
00:13:46.440 collect some
00:13:47.020 information.
00:13:49.340 Apparently,
00:13:50.100 this was his
00:13:50.860 final act
00:13:52.320 before he
00:13:52.820 left.
00:13:54.120 So while
00:13:54.600 technically he
00:13:55.480 was fired,
00:13:56.800 apparently that
00:13:57.440 was the plan.
00:13:58.880 So it looks
00:13:59.540 like he was
00:13:59.920 trying to get
00:14:00.400 fired and he
00:14:00.960 was done
00:14:02.440 with the
00:14:03.980 network and
00:14:04.880 he went out
00:14:05.300 in style.
00:14:06.240 Now,
00:14:06.560 I happen to
00:14:07.240 be a really
00:14:08.540 big fan
00:14:09.380 of resigning
00:14:11.680 in a
00:14:13.160 spectacular
00:14:13.680 fashion.
00:14:15.360 Very big
00:14:15.940 fan of that.
00:14:17.560 And so
00:14:18.240 the fact
00:14:18.600 that he
00:14:18.860 did this
00:14:19.280 play on
00:14:19.880 his way
00:14:20.260 out,
00:14:21.060 he will
00:14:21.360 always be
00:14:21.880 my hero.
00:14:23.160 I so
00:14:24.020 want to
00:14:24.380 know his
00:14:24.760 name,
00:14:25.400 or her
00:14:25.780 name,
00:14:26.300 I'm assuming
00:14:27.120 a gender,
00:14:27.940 I shouldn't
00:14:28.200 be doing
00:14:28.500 that.
00:14:29.260 So he
00:14:29.840 or her,
00:14:31.580 I would
00:14:32.380 like to
00:14:32.680 know who
00:14:32.960 this is
00:14:33.360 because that's
00:14:33.740 my new
00:14:34.080 hero.
00:14:35.620 I absolutely
00:14:36.460 want to be
00:14:37.040 this person's
00:14:37.640 friend.
00:14:38.520 I want to
00:14:38.900 be their
00:14:39.160 friend.
00:14:39.460 That's
00:14:40.780 it.
00:14:41.400 Anybody
00:14:41.700 who could
00:14:42.080 do this
00:14:42.480 is my
00:14:42.820 friend.
00:14:44.020 I don't
00:14:44.340 care what
00:14:44.640 else is
00:14:44.940 going on.
00:14:48.120 So that's
00:14:48.980 fun.
00:14:51.280 Did you
00:14:51.860 see Matt
00:14:52.400 Walsh's
00:14:53.100 Twitter thread
00:14:54.180 about what
00:14:55.820 Fox News
00:14:56.580 is teaching
00:14:58.600 its employees
00:14:59.420 about Pride
00:15:00.860 Month?
00:15:01.140 I don't
00:15:03.140 even know
00:15:04.060 how to
00:15:04.300 describe it.
00:15:06.400 But apparently
00:15:07.040 the required
00:15:08.300 Fox News
00:15:09.440 propaganda
00:15:11.160 for their
00:15:11.820 own employees
00:15:12.540 about Pride
00:15:13.220 Month is
00:15:14.180 just jaw
00:15:14.780 dropping.
00:15:16.780 I don't
00:15:17.600 even know
00:15:17.900 how to
00:15:18.200 describe it.
00:15:19.460 It's
00:15:19.860 hard not
00:15:21.940 to call
00:15:22.360 it insane.
00:15:24.740 Right?
00:15:25.120 It looks
00:15:25.760 so far
00:15:26.560 beyond what
00:15:28.320 any reasonable
00:15:29.220 person would
00:15:29.860 think is
00:15:30.400 appropriate in
00:15:31.280 any situation.
00:15:32.780 And I'm
00:15:33.220 not being
00:15:33.620 a prude.
00:15:35.300 Right?
00:15:35.760 I'm not
00:15:36.320 saying,
00:15:37.220 you know,
00:15:38.000 straight sex
00:15:38.700 is good
00:15:39.120 and gay
00:15:39.580 sex is
00:15:39.980 bad.
00:15:40.300 Nothing
00:15:40.500 like that.
00:15:41.460 Nothing
00:15:41.720 like that.
00:15:42.640 You know,
00:15:42.960 among adults,
00:15:43.720 whatever,
00:15:44.100 whatever.
00:15:45.120 But how
00:15:48.480 did such
00:15:48.960 a small
00:15:49.540 group of
00:15:50.080 people end
00:15:51.680 up with so
00:15:52.320 much control
00:15:53.100 over our
00:15:53.620 lives?
00:15:54.580 It's such a
00:15:55.560 small group
00:15:56.100 of people.
00:15:57.780 Why are
00:15:58.420 their problems
00:15:59.080 greater than
00:15:59.860 every other
00:16:01.200 category on
00:16:01.920 earth?
00:16:02.200 things like
00:16:03.640 you don't
00:16:03.900 think fat
00:16:05.020 people and
00:16:05.620 sick people
00:16:06.400 and, you
00:16:07.560 know, people
00:16:08.140 with different
00:16:08.620 abilities and
00:16:09.660 you don't
00:16:11.360 think there's
00:16:11.820 like a
00:16:12.160 million categories
00:16:13.080 of people
00:16:13.540 with fucking
00:16:14.040 issues or
00:16:15.520 special, let's
00:16:16.420 say not
00:16:16.880 issues, but
00:16:17.460 let's say
00:16:17.760 special
00:16:18.640 situations.
00:16:20.180 It's like you
00:16:21.060 could slice
00:16:21.940 the population
00:16:23.640 up into a
00:16:25.580 million different
00:16:26.540 aggrieved groups
00:16:27.880 and they would
00:16:28.420 all have a
00:16:28.840 point.
00:16:29.780 Every one of
00:16:30.360 them would
00:16:30.580 have a
00:16:30.880 point.
00:16:32.140 And if you
00:16:32.580 listen to it,
00:16:33.140 you say, well,
00:16:33.620 that's a pretty
00:16:33.960 good point.
00:16:35.680 But why is
00:16:36.760 one group the
00:16:38.380 only one that
00:16:39.000 we have to
00:16:39.700 look at and
00:16:40.920 care about and
00:16:41.660 have a month?
00:16:43.500 How many
00:16:44.100 months are
00:16:44.700 there?
00:16:45.620 So we know
00:16:46.060 we got Black
00:16:46.720 History Month,
00:16:47.980 but I think we
00:16:49.040 got that one
00:16:49.620 honestly, wouldn't
00:16:51.200 you say?
00:16:52.080 Black History
00:16:52.780 Month, I mean,
00:16:54.100 there was
00:16:54.440 slavery.
00:16:56.380 I feel like the
00:16:57.360 country came on
00:16:58.200 that one honestly,
00:16:59.140 meaning, yeah,
00:17:00.620 we should note
00:17:01.920 that.
00:17:02.680 You don't want
00:17:03.140 to forget that.
00:17:04.380 But Pride
00:17:05.300 Month, and
00:17:07.840 again, this is
00:17:08.620 nothing against
00:17:09.380 the LGBTQ
00:17:10.320 community, which
00:17:11.940 I am a big
00:17:12.820 supporter of.
00:17:14.080 I love my
00:17:14.960 LGBTQs.
00:17:16.800 But why does
00:17:18.420 anybody need a
00:17:19.120 month?
00:17:20.440 Again, like I
00:17:21.160 said, slavery is
00:17:22.240 the special case.
00:17:25.020 Ah.
00:17:25.180 Well, it's
00:17:27.960 an interesting
00:17:28.940 situation, and
00:17:30.000 no doubt we're
00:17:31.200 reaching the
00:17:31.720 peak of it.
00:17:33.360 All right, here's
00:17:34.260 a story that I
00:17:35.480 swear to God is
00:17:36.380 like Groundhog
00:17:37.160 Day.
00:17:37.860 Every time I
00:17:38.760 think this story
00:17:39.540 has already been
00:17:40.220 reported, I
00:17:42.320 learned that it
00:17:43.080 wasn't exactly.
00:17:45.520 Can anybody
00:17:46.240 give me a
00:17:47.500 Groundhog Day
00:17:48.540 kind of a
00:17:50.640 clarification here?
00:17:51.660 How many times
00:17:53.380 have we been
00:17:54.100 told that we
00:17:54.680 found out that
00:17:55.560 the virus really
00:17:58.760 did come from
00:17:59.560 the Wuhan lab?
00:18:01.480 Am I wrong
00:18:02.420 that every few
00:18:03.960 months I wake
00:18:04.640 up to the same
00:18:05.280 story, as if we
00:18:06.800 didn't know, but
00:18:08.240 now we just
00:18:08.840 learned it?
00:18:10.800 I thought we
00:18:11.760 didn't know and
00:18:12.380 then just learned
00:18:13.040 it at least six
00:18:13.740 different times.
00:18:15.160 How many times
00:18:16.020 do we have to
00:18:16.700 pretend we didn't
00:18:18.300 know and then
00:18:18.960 just found out,
00:18:19.960 and now there's
00:18:21.400 another one?
00:18:22.920 Now, this is the
00:18:23.880 worst of all,
00:18:24.820 right?
00:18:25.380 And I think Matt
00:18:26.700 Taibbi and Michael
00:18:27.760 Schellenberger are
00:18:28.720 on this case,
00:18:29.900 doing the research,
00:18:30.940 and another person
00:18:31.820 whose name I
00:18:32.340 tragically forget.
00:18:34.080 So there's somebody
00:18:34.720 else who needs
00:18:35.520 credit that I just
00:18:36.280 forgot their name.
00:18:39.360 But apparently the
00:18:40.560 first three people
00:18:41.540 infected with the
00:18:42.460 virus were
00:18:43.100 employees of the
00:18:44.080 lab.
00:18:46.300 Wait.
00:18:47.740 What?
00:18:48.220 The first three
00:18:53.620 people infected
00:18:54.540 were employees
00:18:55.580 of the
00:18:56.080 we're going to
00:18:57.520 infect you with
00:18:58.200 a virus lab?
00:19:01.900 How long have
00:19:02.860 we known this?
00:19:05.540 How long have
00:19:06.460 we known that?
00:19:08.080 And then part of
00:19:08.740 the reporting is
00:19:09.440 that, you know,
00:19:10.740 FBI Director
00:19:12.180 Christopher Wray
00:19:13.040 said that they've
00:19:16.820 known for a long
00:19:17.540 time it was the
00:19:18.200 lab, that the
00:19:19.600 FBI has known
00:19:20.260 for a long
00:19:20.740 time.
00:19:23.140 Did we know
00:19:23.920 that?
00:19:24.720 I mean, but
00:19:26.000 just give me a
00:19:27.980 fact check.
00:19:30.900 Have we not
00:19:31.500 gone through the
00:19:32.140 cycle of not
00:19:33.280 knowing and then
00:19:33.940 knowing like six
00:19:34.760 times?
00:19:35.940 How many times
00:19:36.860 do we have to
00:19:37.400 find out once
00:19:38.100 again it really
00:19:39.020 was the Wuhan
00:19:40.580 lab?
00:19:41.100 I don't know
00:19:41.420 what's going on
00:19:41.920 here.
00:19:42.080 I'm actually
00:19:42.440 confused about
00:19:43.940 why we ever
00:19:44.840 thought it wasn't
00:19:45.660 them.
00:19:46.720 Whoever thought
00:19:47.380 it wasn't?
00:19:49.080 You know, I've
00:19:49.620 told you the
00:19:50.120 story that before
00:19:53.640 you'd ever, before
00:19:54.900 you ever heard
00:19:55.660 there was a lab, I
00:19:57.900 already knew it
00:19:58.420 was the lab.
00:19:59.540 Have I told you
00:20:00.100 that story?
00:20:01.040 Before you ever
00:20:01.740 knew there was a
00:20:02.560 lab there, I had
00:20:05.100 privately in a
00:20:06.100 private conversation
00:20:06.960 seen the, seen
00:20:09.720 where the lab was
00:20:10.740 and where the wet
00:20:11.560 market was.
00:20:13.380 It's like right
00:20:14.280 across the street
00:20:15.240 and the name of
00:20:17.900 it, like I think
00:20:19.360 Guff Hill has said
00:20:20.540 this and I think
00:20:21.480 John Stewart has
00:20:23.020 said this, the
00:20:24.760 name is like right
00:20:26.300 on the door, you
00:20:27.040 know, the
00:20:28.040 infectious disease
00:20:29.420 lab or whatever.
00:20:31.880 And the day that
00:20:33.300 somebody showed that
00:20:34.080 to me, I look at
00:20:35.400 the lab and I
00:20:36.200 thought, well,
00:20:37.500 that's not a
00:20:38.180 fucking coincidence.
00:20:40.060 Of course it came
00:20:40.880 from there.
00:20:41.300 So I knew that
00:20:42.940 before, and trust
00:20:44.840 me, everybody in
00:20:47.000 the government
00:20:47.440 probably knew from
00:20:49.700 day one.
00:20:51.160 Because all they
00:20:51.700 had to do is know
00:20:52.360 where the lab was
00:20:53.300 and that was the
00:20:53.860 end of the story.
00:20:54.860 All you needed to
00:20:55.880 know is where the
00:20:57.340 lab was.
00:20:58.120 That's it.
00:20:58.960 And then you would
00:20:59.540 know the whole
00:20:59.960 story.
00:21:01.160 And it turns out it
00:21:01.880 was exactly what it
00:21:02.640 looked like.
00:21:04.080 All right, let me
00:21:04.960 talk about the
00:21:05.840 Mar-a-Lago
00:21:08.020 documents and the
00:21:09.380 sock drawer defense.
00:21:11.300 And I've been
00:21:13.640 trying to figure
00:21:14.260 out the two
00:21:15.580 movies on one
00:21:16.460 screen.
00:21:17.580 You're aware of
00:21:18.460 one movie that
00:21:19.460 says Trump will
00:21:20.340 definitely be cleared
00:21:21.480 of all charges
00:21:22.200 because the
00:21:23.400 Clinton sock drawer
00:21:24.540 case basically
00:21:26.600 sets a precedent
00:21:27.560 that he can take
00:21:28.960 what he wants.
00:21:30.420 You've heard that,
00:21:31.200 right?
00:21:32.080 And then I see
00:21:34.140 tweets from the
00:21:34.900 left that say
00:21:36.040 those people who
00:21:37.240 believe that are
00:21:39.140 hallucinating and
00:21:40.300 stupid and they're
00:21:42.260 silly.
00:21:43.560 But I never saw a
00:21:44.720 reason.
00:21:46.040 Like, everybody
00:21:46.600 would just say
00:21:47.140 you're stupid and
00:21:48.100 you're silly.
00:21:49.340 And I'm like,
00:21:49.940 and?
00:21:50.720 And?
00:21:51.540 Why does the
00:21:52.400 sock drawer defense
00:21:53.300 not work?
00:21:54.620 Because?
00:21:55.300 Can you give me
00:21:55.900 any reasons?
00:21:56.360 So I had to do a
00:21:57.760 deep dive today in
00:21:58.820 the fake fact
00:21:59.820 checking world of
00:22:00.820 PolitiFact and all
00:22:02.240 those places.
00:22:03.260 And of course,
00:22:04.600 all of the top
00:22:05.460 search results,
00:22:06.400 if you Google it,
00:22:07.800 all of the top
00:22:08.980 search results say
00:22:10.440 the sock drawer
00:22:11.220 defense is bullshit.
00:22:12.780 Did you know that?
00:22:14.480 Do you know if you
00:22:15.120 Google it, all the
00:22:16.540 top results say it's
00:22:17.620 bullshit.
00:22:19.040 But do you know
00:22:19.820 why?
00:22:20.180 This will be a
00:22:23.340 test to your
00:22:23.800 bubble.
00:22:24.680 And by the way,
00:22:25.380 I'm very guilty of
00:22:26.320 this, so I'm doing
00:22:28.080 my mea culpa here.
00:22:30.080 So I actually
00:22:30.840 believed some of the
00:22:31.720 things I heard about
00:22:32.480 that is sock drawer
00:22:33.280 defense.
00:22:35.400 None of it's true.
00:22:37.680 Did you know that?
00:22:38.820 The whole sock drawer
00:22:39.780 thing is complete
00:22:40.560 bullshit.
00:22:42.080 How many of you do
00:22:42.980 that?
00:22:44.940 I'm going to tell
00:22:45.660 you why in a
00:22:46.180 moment.
00:22:48.380 First of all,
00:22:49.100 that the sock drawer
00:22:50.460 was not about the
00:22:51.480 government versus
00:22:52.420 Bill Clinton.
00:22:53.560 Did you know that?
00:22:55.140 I thought the
00:22:56.000 government had an
00:22:57.920 issue with Bill
00:22:58.580 Clinton, and then
00:22:59.540 the courts worked
00:23:00.580 it out, and then
00:23:01.880 Bill Clinton was
00:23:02.660 shown to be right
00:23:03.440 because simply by
00:23:04.600 taking the stuff
00:23:05.880 that was good
00:23:06.960 enough to say it
00:23:07.620 was personal.
00:23:08.520 So there you go.
00:23:10.160 So he can just
00:23:10.780 take anything he
00:23:11.420 wants, and it
00:23:11.920 applies to Trump
00:23:12.960 too.
00:23:13.780 All right, so the
00:23:14.320 first thing you need
00:23:15.160 to know is that it
00:23:15.740 was never the
00:23:16.300 government against
00:23:17.500 Clinton.
00:23:19.100 It was Judicial
00:23:20.260 Watch, a private
00:23:22.420 organization.
00:23:23.400 They were suing to
00:23:24.580 try to get access to
00:23:25.740 the private tapes
00:23:27.340 under the theory
00:23:28.760 that they weren't
00:23:29.400 private.
00:23:30.960 But then the
00:23:31.780 court said there's
00:23:33.320 nobody whose job it
00:23:34.360 is to decide what's
00:23:35.520 private or not, and
00:23:37.100 therefore the court
00:23:37.880 cannot decide that
00:23:39.020 they are or are not
00:23:39.960 private.
00:23:41.260 I just ruined that
00:23:42.560 explanation totally.
00:23:43.500 But let's see, the
00:23:44.920 summary of that is a
00:23:47.180 private organization
00:23:48.160 wanted access to the
00:23:49.140 tapes, and the court
00:23:50.460 says we don't really
00:23:51.600 have any control over
00:23:52.540 that.
00:23:53.500 So no.
00:23:55.980 But that has nothing
00:23:56.940 to do with the Trump
00:23:57.740 situation.
00:23:59.120 So here's where I was
00:24:00.440 getting confused by all
00:24:02.180 the defenses and the
00:24:03.520 claims, all right?
00:24:04.540 And I think I'll bet
00:24:05.740 most of you are
00:24:06.440 confused about the
00:24:07.320 same thing.
00:24:08.280 And this clarification
00:24:09.480 might be the first time
00:24:10.740 you understand what's
00:24:11.700 going on.
00:24:12.520 Maybe.
00:24:12.940 That's my...
00:24:13.600 So my goal is that
00:24:14.560 this will be the first
00:24:15.360 time you understand
00:24:16.180 what's going on.
00:24:17.060 Because the two bubbles
00:24:18.160 are not talking, right?
00:24:19.900 There is no...
00:24:21.540 There's almost no
00:24:22.340 contact whatsoever.
00:24:24.380 And I also saw the
00:24:25.660 Wall Street Journal
00:24:26.320 article where the
00:24:27.800 lawyer who lost the
00:24:29.420 Clinton sock drawer
00:24:30.600 case said, oh, yeah,
00:24:32.760 I'm the expert on this
00:24:34.200 situation.
00:24:35.660 I lost the case trying
00:24:37.480 to get access to him.
00:24:39.040 And so I can tell you
00:24:40.020 for sure that
00:24:41.500 Trump is not in
00:24:43.200 trouble because I'm
00:24:44.640 an expert in this
00:24:45.380 very thing.
00:24:47.380 However, that expert
00:24:50.580 is a partisan.
00:24:52.280 And so when the
00:24:52.820 expert says, I know
00:24:53.840 everything about this
00:24:54.700 and here's my opinion,
00:24:56.020 you're getting a very
00:24:57.300 partisan opinion.
00:24:58.900 All right, this is not
00:24:59.600 somebody who's trying
00:25:00.320 to tell you, you know,
00:25:02.040 the full situation.
00:25:04.560 Now, that's not fair
00:25:05.580 of me.
00:25:06.440 I'm just making that
00:25:07.720 assumption based on
00:25:08.580 association with an
00:25:10.460 entity that has a, you
00:25:11.980 know, a definite
00:25:12.560 political place in the
00:25:14.680 world, right?
00:25:15.460 They're not trying to be
00:25:16.540 objective, in my opinion.
00:25:19.280 You know, they have more
00:25:20.460 of a political agenda.
00:25:22.400 So here's the big
00:25:25.280 clarification.
00:25:25.840 There are two issues,
00:25:28.240 not one.
00:25:29.560 One issue is how does a
00:25:31.140 president declare that
00:25:32.520 something is personal?
00:25:33.580 Personal is different
00:25:36.280 than confidential.
00:25:38.180 So there are two paths,
00:25:39.760 and this is why we're
00:25:40.640 confused.
00:25:41.960 One path is about what
00:25:43.280 is classified, and how
00:25:45.180 do you make it
00:25:45.680 unclassified?
00:25:46.860 That is a separate
00:25:47.800 question from what is
00:25:49.380 personal.
00:25:51.800 Does that make sense?
00:25:53.440 So the standard for the
00:25:55.340 sock drawer case was about
00:25:56.880 what was personal.
00:25:59.900 It was about what was
00:26:01.020 personal.
00:26:01.400 The Clinton situation is
00:26:03.860 about what was classified.
00:26:06.900 Those are not the same.
00:26:08.600 So a sock drawer case
00:26:10.020 gives you, not only does it
00:26:11.480 give you no precedent, but
00:26:13.660 apparently from a legal
00:26:14.980 standpoint, it's not a, it's
00:26:16.440 not a binding precedent, if
00:26:18.460 binding is the right word.
00:26:19.700 It's not a precedent that any
00:26:21.240 court needs to look at.
00:26:23.000 Nobody needs to look at that
00:26:24.420 as a precedent.
00:26:25.720 So there is no precedent that
00:26:27.860 has any legal weight.
00:26:28.980 There is just something that
00:26:30.740 happened, which is
00:26:31.500 different.
00:26:32.880 And so here's what I think is
00:26:37.280 the fact of it.
00:26:43.940 A president can, all right, so
00:26:47.240 here's my best understanding.
00:26:49.260 A president can make any
00:26:50.560 document unclassified, but not
00:26:54.220 personal.
00:26:56.140 So, so Trump does have the
00:26:58.300 right, I believe, to
00:27:00.460 declassify anything, because
00:27:02.020 he's the president, and that
00:27:04.320 his argument might be, and I
00:27:05.920 think this would be the better
00:27:07.260 part of the argument, that the
00:27:09.000 act of removing it is a clear
00:27:11.740 indication of declassification.
00:27:14.840 Now, he might win that and he
00:27:16.360 might not, but I think that's a
00:27:17.540 strong argument, that the mere
00:27:19.600 removing of them is a clear
00:27:22.160 intention to declassify.
00:27:24.720 I don't know, maybe a jury
00:27:25.740 buys that, maybe not, but I
00:27:26.960 can't see 12 people not
00:27:29.140 agreeing.
00:27:30.520 I mean, it might be a mixed
00:27:31.820 jury, but I can't see 12
00:27:33.680 people saying, no, he doesn't
00:27:34.960 have that capability or right.
00:27:37.720 However, here's my
00:27:39.000 understanding that I need a
00:27:40.100 fact check on.
00:27:43.600 Even if something's personal,
00:27:46.080 it's not necessarily owned by
00:27:47.760 the president.
00:27:48.240 This is where it gets weird.
00:27:53.060 So apparently, on day one, when
00:27:56.400 a material is presented or
00:27:58.500 created, you're supposed to
00:27:59.940 designate it personal or
00:28:01.260 government on day one.
00:28:04.400 Right?
00:28:05.020 So if you do that, everything
00:28:07.100 goes well, and there's no
00:28:09.040 problem later.
00:28:10.880 On day one, we said this was
00:28:12.260 personal, we filled out the
00:28:13.700 form, it's been personal from
00:28:15.720 day one.
00:28:16.560 So then that's fine.
00:28:18.100 You can keep that.
00:28:19.480 But what if there's something
00:28:20.480 that didn't get classified that
00:28:22.000 way as personal, and then
00:28:23.880 later on, the president wants
00:28:26.220 to claim it as personal, because
00:28:27.880 hey, just look at it.
00:28:29.720 Just look at it.
00:28:30.640 These are obviously personal.
00:28:32.700 Right?
00:28:33.300 So then who gets to decide?
00:28:35.500 Well, the question, I think
00:28:38.680 Judicial Watch wanted the
00:28:40.220 courts to decide, and the
00:28:41.420 courts basically said that's
00:28:43.160 not their job.
00:28:43.900 And there's no standard for
00:28:46.360 that.
00:28:47.220 So I think I'm butchering the
00:28:50.100 legal descriptions here, so
00:28:51.480 you should all know that
00:28:52.360 that's the case.
00:28:53.440 But the basic idea here is
00:28:55.020 don't confuse a president's
00:28:57.400 ability to make something a
00:28:58.740 personal document, which I
00:29:00.140 don't think they have the
00:29:00.840 right.
00:29:02.100 I don't think the president
00:29:03.020 can just say after the fact
00:29:04.520 it's personal.
00:29:05.780 But there is also nobody else
00:29:07.460 who can do it.
00:29:09.120 Isn't that weird?
00:29:10.440 It's just a black hole.
00:29:11.700 If you don't do it on day
00:29:13.540 one, there's nobody's job it
00:29:16.020 is later to say, oh, this
00:29:18.120 was wrong, this was actually
00:29:19.160 personal.
00:29:21.600 So I think what we have here,
00:29:24.120 which makes me think that
00:29:25.500 Trump will not have the
00:29:28.160 prison time for this, I think
00:29:30.160 what we have here is a
00:29:31.100 situation sufficiently
00:29:32.380 complicated that a jury is
00:29:34.380 going to have a tough time
00:29:35.200 with it.
00:29:36.280 And if the jury has a tough
00:29:37.580 time with it, I don't know
00:29:38.680 how they find guilty.
00:29:39.560 Because it would just be too
00:29:41.600 hard to hold it in their
00:29:42.480 heads.
00:29:43.240 There's just too many
00:29:43.840 variables here.
00:29:46.100 So I don't know what's
00:29:47.900 going to happen, but to me
00:29:50.560 it looks like it's a big old
00:29:51.560 confusing case as opposed to
00:29:54.180 something where Trump was
00:29:55.460 doing something illegal.
00:29:59.360 It looks like just confusion
00:30:00.880 over who had rights, and if
00:30:02.700 that's all it is, I don't think
00:30:04.340 people go to prison for that.
00:30:05.560 So my overall feeling is that
00:30:08.580 the legal system will not put
00:30:10.700 him in jail, but I could be
00:30:13.720 surprised.
00:30:16.020 All right, Peggy Noonan is
00:30:18.020 writing about Trump, making
00:30:19.320 sure that we buy into the
00:30:22.060 summer hoax.
00:30:22.980 Now the summer hoax is that
00:30:24.560 somehow we magically know that
00:30:27.340 the documents in those boxes are
00:30:29.500 not just classified, which is the
00:30:31.580 one part we do know, but
00:30:33.300 dangerous, dangerous to the
00:30:35.920 country.
00:30:38.280 Now, nobody's claiming that any
00:30:40.460 of that information got out in
00:30:43.260 any way that was dangerous.
00:30:45.020 So there's no victim.
00:30:47.140 They still have to make it look
00:30:48.600 like it's terrible after the
00:30:50.640 fact when there's no victim.
00:30:53.980 Now, if you're talking about it
00:30:55.600 before these documents had been
00:30:57.580 secured, you said, oh, we've got
00:30:59.800 all these maybe sensitive documents
00:31:01.860 that are unsecured.
00:31:03.380 I would say, act right away.
00:31:06.000 Let's do something to secure those
00:31:07.640 documents.
00:31:08.220 Who did that?
00:31:09.180 Who is to blame?
00:31:10.980 But it's already over.
00:31:12.660 The documents are secured.
00:31:15.720 There's no risk now.
00:31:17.680 And apparently there was
00:31:19.240 no exposure then.
00:31:21.700 So there's no alleged victim
00:31:23.280 whatsoever.
00:31:23.800 But they've got to make this the
00:31:26.480 biggest story of the summer
00:31:27.420 because it's all they got.
00:31:28.360 So Peggy Noonan writes this piece
00:31:32.540 in the Wall Street Journal to try
00:31:33.800 to make that case.
00:31:35.780 And in her own writing, she
00:31:37.260 referenced something she said in
00:31:38.620 the past about Trump and entering
00:31:41.200 the Weimar Republic phase.
00:31:44.540 That's right.
00:31:45.420 A Hitler reference.
00:31:47.500 So here's a person who is writing
00:31:49.160 an article which you are supposed
00:31:51.100 to gain some wisdom and insight by
00:31:53.360 reading her opinion.
00:31:54.200 And you know that before you even
00:31:56.460 hear the opinion about the
00:31:57.540 documents, that she is at one
00:31:59.720 time gone full Hitler in her
00:32:03.000 understanding of Trump.
00:32:05.660 Now, is there anything else you need
00:32:07.240 to listen to from this individual?
00:32:09.140 I think that's completely
00:32:10.260 disqualifying.
00:32:11.640 If you've ever referred to Trump
00:32:14.820 in a serious way as, oh, Weimar
00:32:17.120 Republic, next Hitler, dictator,
00:32:20.380 authoritarian.
00:32:20.880 It's just disqualifying.
00:32:23.600 Because you know at that point
00:32:24.760 that they're not even trying.
00:32:26.900 They're not even trying to be
00:32:28.460 useful or helpful.
00:32:30.800 So she goes on with a bunch of
00:32:33.480 twaddle about how dangerous these
00:32:35.060 documents might be that we've never
00:32:36.580 seen.
00:32:39.560 Here's a sentence from her.
00:32:41.240 You can't get more serious, more
00:32:43.520 breathtaking on a charge against a
00:32:46.400 former president.
00:32:47.180 The documents have to do with the
00:32:50.020 most essential of our security
00:32:51.980 interests.
00:32:52.980 They're about how we keep our
00:32:54.740 country safe from military attack.
00:32:58.940 Are they?
00:33:00.260 Are they, Peggy?
00:33:02.200 Which ones did you get to read?
00:33:05.260 Yeah?
00:33:05.820 Which ones did you get to read?
00:33:07.780 Because I didn't get to read any of
00:33:09.180 them.
00:33:10.100 And I don't believe that they're
00:33:12.280 important or sensitive or that they
00:33:14.320 matter at all.
00:33:14.940 Do I believe that one of them might
00:33:17.280 reference an attack plan on another
00:33:19.940 country?
00:33:20.880 Sure.
00:33:22.060 Maybe.
00:33:23.280 Maybe.
00:33:24.340 Do I think that that attack plan would
00:33:26.040 actually make a difference to anybody
00:33:29.000 if they saw it?
00:33:30.760 What do you think an executive level
00:33:32.700 attack plan looks like?
00:33:35.800 Let's say it's Iran.
00:33:37.220 We don't know that, but let's say it is.
00:33:39.000 Let's say it was an attack plan for
00:33:40.740 Iran.
00:33:41.580 Do you think Iran would learn anything
00:33:43.240 from that, the executive summary of the
00:33:45.900 attack plan?
00:33:47.160 Well, the first wave would be an air
00:33:49.360 attack and we'd use all our good
00:33:51.060 weapons and missiles.
00:33:52.640 Because they didn't know that.
00:33:54.820 They didn't know that we first would
00:33:56.660 do an air attack with missiles and try
00:33:59.620 to do it from a distance.
00:34:01.180 They didn't see that coming.
00:34:04.620 They didn't see that our intelligence
00:34:06.520 in the country to, you know, arm them.
00:34:10.580 I never saw that coming.
00:34:14.460 What could possibly be in an Iran
00:34:17.000 attack document that Iran would not
00:34:19.360 consider completely obvious?
00:34:21.920 The whole point of having a gigando
00:34:24.140 army, military, is that you can attack
00:34:28.700 anybody of that size and you pretty much
00:34:31.040 know you're going to win because you've
00:34:32.680 got the big military that can do all the
00:34:34.360 things that you put on that memo.
00:34:35.540 But everybody else knows it, too.
00:34:38.460 Everybody knows how the attacks look.
00:34:42.320 You know, suppose they say stuff like,
00:34:44.540 oh, we're going to do a lightning attack
00:34:46.720 to try to take Tehran.
00:34:49.360 What happens when the actual war starts?
00:34:52.920 Because the other thing that we know is
00:34:54.380 that war plans only last until the first
00:34:57.220 shot.
00:34:57.980 And then you have to alter.
00:35:00.280 So basically, what we imagine we're doing
00:35:03.900 on day one is going to be whatever they
00:35:05.900 teach in the war colleges.
00:35:07.840 It's going to be like all the obvious
00:35:09.480 attack stuff.
00:35:10.860 And then that would be infinitely tweaked
00:35:13.080 if any real war happened.
00:35:15.260 So what is it that Iran would learn from
00:35:17.340 that?
00:35:18.280 Probably nothing.
00:35:19.720 Probably nothing.
00:35:21.180 Because like I said, it would be an
00:35:22.480 executive summary.
00:35:24.020 What would the president be seeing?
00:35:25.860 Is he going to see a list of our assets?
00:35:27.640 Is he going to see we will put, you know,
00:35:30.780 X number of tanks into the theater or
00:35:32.840 whatever?
00:35:33.220 We wouldn't.
00:35:33.700 I don't think we'd use tanks.
00:35:35.420 But I don't know.
00:35:37.120 I just can't imagine what it would be
00:35:38.820 that it wouldn't make any difference.
00:35:41.340 So is it serious and breathtaking?
00:35:47.300 Does it talk about U.S. nuclear programs?
00:35:49.940 Oh, no.
00:35:51.540 Oh, no.
00:35:52.380 All right, here's one.
00:35:54.680 When it talks about the U.S.
00:35:56.360 nuclear program.
00:35:58.560 Did they say weapons?
00:36:01.920 Have you ever once asked yourself this
00:36:03.800 question?
00:36:04.580 All the reporting I see is about our
00:36:06.660 quote, nuclear program.
00:36:10.120 How do you know that means weapons?
00:36:13.420 Couldn't it be that we plan to build a
00:36:15.020 bunch of nuclear reactors if we can?
00:36:21.060 Yeah.
00:36:21.780 Why doesn't it mean energy?
00:36:24.320 I don't know.
00:36:24.800 Well, I mean, it could.
00:36:26.820 Are you telling me that, you know, there's
00:36:29.040 no chance that it could just be about
00:36:30.800 nuclear energy?
00:36:32.900 It might be.
00:36:35.420 Now, I think it's more likely that it's about
00:36:37.260 nuclear weapons, of course.
00:36:38.960 But we don't know anything.
00:36:40.680 About potential vulnerabilities of the U.S.
00:36:43.800 Really?
00:36:44.200 Do you think somebody gave the president a
00:36:47.180 document about our potential vulnerabilities
00:36:49.280 and he took it with him?
00:36:53.060 I don't believe that.
00:36:55.560 Not intentionally.
00:36:57.800 Like, a document that if our enemies saw it,
00:37:01.200 they could destroy our country?
00:37:02.740 Do you think he just threw that in the box
00:37:06.220 with the other stuff?
00:37:07.480 I don't think so.
00:37:09.300 I mean, I get that it's potentially true.
00:37:11.700 It doesn't seem likely.
00:37:14.700 And plans for possible retaliation,
00:37:17.920 again, which would be totally generic,
00:37:19.820 in my opinion.
00:37:22.040 All right.
00:37:23.100 So we've seen this movie before.
00:37:25.280 So here's how the movie plays.
00:37:27.340 We're going to spend all summer long,
00:37:29.240 because it's a slow-news summer.
00:37:30.960 It's always slow news.
00:37:32.320 And all summer long,
00:37:33.900 the news will try to make us guess
00:37:35.720 what's in those boxes.
00:37:37.280 And they'll use so many words like
00:37:39.720 serious and breathtaking
00:37:41.540 that you'll start to think
00:37:43.260 there's something bad in those boxes.
00:37:45.260 Which, by the way, there might be.
00:37:48.520 But we've seen the movie too many times.
00:37:51.620 And the movie goes like this.
00:37:53.380 Oh, those boxes have so many secrets in them.
00:37:56.600 Secrets of the worst possible kind.
00:37:59.260 All right.
00:37:59.740 Maybe there are not a lot of secrets,
00:38:01.880 but there's at least two or three really bad.
00:38:05.240 Okay.
00:38:05.540 Not two or three secrets,
00:38:07.180 but one of those things in there was really...
00:38:09.360 Okay.
00:38:09.600 It wasn't what you thought it was.
00:38:11.940 And that happens approximately
00:38:13.480 two years after the event.
00:38:16.340 Right?
00:38:17.460 It's a two-year lag.
00:38:19.400 Two years from hoax to unveiling hoax.
00:38:21.880 It's the same pattern every time.
00:38:24.160 So all that matters is
00:38:25.480 they can spend the entire summer
00:38:26.820 talking about the things you can't see.
00:38:29.580 And, you know,
00:38:30.060 if you could see the things you can't see,
00:38:32.180 boy, would you feel bad.
00:38:34.620 Whoa.
00:38:35.580 Whoa.
00:38:36.180 Would you hate Trump
00:38:37.060 if you could see the things
00:38:38.220 that nobody can see.
00:38:39.820 Right?
00:38:40.720 Now, if you could see the things
00:38:42.100 that you can see,
00:38:43.720 Trump looks pretty good.
00:38:46.360 You know, compared to Biden.
00:38:47.540 But, if you could see the things
00:38:50.740 you can't see,
00:38:53.200 well, can we agree
00:38:53.940 that if you could see
00:38:54.820 the things we can't see,
00:38:56.480 you'd be seeing some stuff.
00:38:58.660 Oh, what you would be seeing
00:39:00.040 if you couldn't see
00:39:00.760 the things you can see.
00:39:02.960 But the things you can see
00:39:04.440 look fine.
00:39:07.980 But, oh, those things you can't see.
00:39:10.960 All right.
00:39:11.740 Ukraine is turning into a joke.
00:39:13.780 You know, all the news is bullshit.
00:39:17.460 I think one of the generals said
00:39:19.620 that all those pictures
00:39:21.260 of destroyed Ukrainian tanks
00:39:23.620 are this...
00:39:25.560 He thinks it might be
00:39:26.780 the same group of five tanks
00:39:28.220 that they photograph
00:39:28.920 from different angles.
00:39:31.400 Now, I don't think
00:39:32.260 that's quite true.
00:39:33.520 But, obviously,
00:39:34.420 some of that is going on.
00:39:36.100 Right?
00:39:36.740 Some exaggeration of losses
00:39:39.200 on both sides.
00:39:40.680 But, have you seen the map?
00:39:43.780 Of how much land
00:39:45.580 has changed hands
00:39:47.160 since the offensive started,
00:39:49.180 the counteroffensive?
00:39:52.940 None.
00:39:54.340 Basically none.
00:39:56.140 So, the entire counteroffensive,
00:39:57.840 which is definitely,
00:39:59.660 oh, yeah,
00:40:00.180 it's losing a lot of men,
00:40:01.340 but they're making
00:40:01.960 sure but slow progress.
00:40:05.160 And then today,
00:40:05.840 I learned,
00:40:06.800 it might take several months
00:40:08.160 of probing the defenses
00:40:10.100 before they find the place
00:40:11.380 they break through.
00:40:12.080 Sure, that's convenient.
00:40:16.240 It's going to take you
00:40:17.040 several months
00:40:17.920 probing those,
00:40:19.800 probing those defenses
00:40:21.240 until you find the place
00:40:23.160 you can break through.
00:40:26.540 Oh, Nancy Dill.
00:40:28.920 Let me take care of Nancy.
00:40:31.180 Nancy, you fell for
00:40:32.100 the 4chan hoax.
00:40:33.860 You poor, poor, stupid cunt.
00:40:36.460 You fell for the 4chan hoax
00:40:38.180 about me and my pandemic opinions.
00:40:40.340 You poor girl.
00:40:42.940 Poor girl.
00:40:44.720 Can we all say,
00:40:45.560 poor Nancy Dill.
00:40:47.120 She believes anything.
00:40:48.900 So gullible.
00:40:50.080 You're so gullible.
00:40:51.700 You're adorable.
00:40:53.640 So Nancy's my new mascot.
00:40:55.700 We're going to call her
00:40:56.680 Clot Dill.
00:40:59.060 Mrs. Clot.
00:41:02.000 And continue on.
00:41:04.680 All right.
00:41:05.040 That probably got me
00:41:07.480 demonetized.
00:41:09.260 Totally worth it.
00:41:12.460 You know my opinion
00:41:13.720 about the Ukraine war.
00:41:17.020 That it's really just
00:41:18.080 a big negotiation
00:41:19.000 at this point.
00:41:19.980 Because there's not much land
00:41:21.380 that's going to change hands.
00:41:22.740 And they just need to
00:41:23.600 beat each other up
00:41:24.360 until somebody's willing
00:41:25.220 to talk peace.
00:41:26.020 So I looked on CNN today
00:41:29.440 looking for news.
00:41:31.200 And I read all over
00:41:32.200 the top and everything
00:41:33.240 and there wasn't any news.
00:41:35.460 I mean there were
00:41:36.160 headlines.
00:41:37.740 But none of it
00:41:38.400 looked like news
00:41:40.420 of any importance
00:41:41.180 to anybody.
00:41:42.520 Because it's summer.
00:41:43.620 Right?
00:41:43.800 It's not really their fault.
00:41:44.740 It's just summer.
00:41:45.760 And there's not much news.
00:41:47.660 But there was one
00:41:48.520 headline
00:41:51.040 that looked like
00:41:52.760 it was news.
00:41:53.820 And the headline
00:41:54.400 was something about
00:41:55.240 along the lines of
00:41:56.420 Putin was looking
00:41:58.720 for any way out
00:42:00.020 of the Ukraine situation.
00:42:02.840 Now that would be
00:42:04.260 interesting story
00:42:05.760 wouldn't it?
00:42:06.520 Because that would
00:42:07.100 sort of suggest
00:42:08.140 he's ready to negotiate
00:42:09.400 which would be
00:42:10.780 the biggest story
00:42:12.080 there is.
00:42:13.200 So I clicked
00:42:14.060 on that link
00:42:14.780 that said that
00:42:15.640 Putin
00:42:16.200 might be open
00:42:18.200 to anything
00:42:18.680 to end the war.
00:42:20.400 And after I clicked
00:42:21.320 on the link
00:42:21.800 it went to a different story.
00:42:23.040 The only thing
00:42:25.240 on the CNN page
00:42:26.340 that I thought
00:42:26.820 was interesting
00:42:27.500 that was worth
00:42:28.780 clicking on
00:42:29.400 it was a bad link.
00:42:31.880 True story.
00:42:33.120 It was the only thing
00:42:34.360 that looked interesting
00:42:35.160 and it was a bad link.
00:42:36.660 It went to the wrong story.
00:42:39.660 So that's all
00:42:40.420 you need to know
00:42:41.000 about CNN's
00:42:43.000 news gathering ability.
00:42:45.140 Well we almost
00:42:45.840 had a story
00:42:46.400 but we couldn't
00:42:47.140 get the link.
00:42:47.880 All right
00:42:51.860 I had a little
00:42:52.380 incident in
00:42:53.080 Starbucks yesterday.
00:42:54.360 Some of you
00:42:54.800 watched my live stream
00:42:55.740 yesterday.
00:42:56.600 You know that
00:42:57.140 I had been up
00:42:58.040 the night before
00:42:58.700 with food poisoning
00:43:00.980 and hadn't slept
00:43:01.900 all night.
00:43:03.440 And
00:43:03.780 sometimes my
00:43:05.700 temper
00:43:06.420 is not as easily
00:43:09.080 controllable
00:43:09.840 if I haven't slept.
00:43:11.960 It's a thing.
00:43:13.340 So I was in food
00:43:14.100 I was in
00:43:14.680 Starbucks
00:43:15.180 and I thought
00:43:17.100 I might have
00:43:17.800 just enough energy
00:43:18.760 to do
00:43:20.140 a good solid
00:43:21.080 hour of work
00:43:21.980 today.
00:43:22.440 You know
00:43:22.560 creative work.
00:43:24.080 And
00:43:24.560 I have like
00:43:25.840 five deadlines
00:43:26.620 at the moment
00:43:27.200 because I'm trying
00:43:27.840 to put together
00:43:28.480 two books
00:43:29.520 you know
00:43:29.940 a new one
00:43:30.640 and a reissue
00:43:31.800 looking
00:43:32.620 trying to get
00:43:33.240 audio books done
00:43:34.640 I've got
00:43:35.160 you know
00:43:36.020 the local stuff
00:43:37.360 I've got this
00:43:38.200 I get twice a day.
00:43:39.720 So I have something
00:43:40.080 like five deadlines
00:43:41.120 a day
00:43:41.520 roughly speaking.
00:43:44.080 And
00:43:44.440 I go
00:43:45.700 into Starbucks
00:43:46.740 tired and cranky
00:43:48.760 I sit down
00:43:50.040 and there's only
00:43:50.840 three people
00:43:51.480 in the Starbucks
00:43:52.420 customers.
00:43:55.660 All three of us
00:43:56.680 have laptops
00:43:57.360 clearly we all
00:43:58.900 came there to work.
00:44:00.520 Guy behind me
00:44:01.480 pulls out his cell phone
00:44:02.480 and starts making a call.
00:44:04.560 No problem.
00:44:05.720 People make phone calls
00:44:06.940 from Starbucks
00:44:07.400 all the time.
00:44:08.560 And it's usually
00:44:09.060 something like
00:44:09.860 you know
00:44:10.920 oh I'll be home
00:44:11.660 in 15 minutes
00:44:12.480 or did you
00:44:13.880 get my email.
00:44:15.860 Right.
00:44:16.500 This guy decides
00:44:17.480 to make it very long
00:44:18.500 and what was
00:44:19.100 obviously going to be
00:44:20.400 a lengthy
00:44:21.900 loud phone call
00:44:22.940 right behind me
00:44:24.120 in a place
00:44:25.640 with only three people.
00:44:27.200 And it's me
00:44:27.600 on my laptop
00:44:28.420 obviously trying to work
00:44:30.340 and he's doing
00:44:31.380 the phone call.
00:44:32.960 So the first thing
00:44:33.920 I say to myself
00:44:34.680 is well
00:44:35.380 there's no law
00:44:37.140 that says
00:44:37.620 he can't do that.
00:44:38.540 Right.
00:44:38.660 There's no sign
00:44:39.460 there's no
00:44:40.080 there's no guideline.
00:44:42.440 So
00:44:42.760 it's just my problem.
00:44:45.980 Right.
00:44:46.100 It's just something
00:44:46.660 bothering me.
00:44:47.940 This is not about
00:44:48.640 it's not about him
00:44:49.580 I'm telling myself.
00:44:52.040 And I try to work
00:44:53.380 and I couldn't
00:44:54.260 I couldn't even
00:44:56.040 see the laptop
00:44:57.060 because
00:44:58.700 my vision
00:44:59.900 started turning red
00:45:00.960 because I was
00:45:02.920 getting
00:45:03.220 more and more angry.
00:45:06.120 And I was saying
00:45:06.720 this on the
00:45:07.360 I did a live stream
00:45:08.480 from the man cave
00:45:09.480 last night
00:45:10.040 so I said
00:45:10.560 some of this.
00:45:11.820 I first did
00:45:12.820 the three look around
00:45:14.620 technique
00:45:16.160 which I'm going
00:45:17.780 to model for you
00:45:18.520 some of you
00:45:19.120 have seen it.
00:45:20.460 So he was behind me
00:45:21.700 but facing my direction.
00:45:23.660 So the first look around
00:45:24.740 you just keep
00:45:25.740 a neutral expression.
00:45:27.580 You know
00:45:27.700 like maybe you were
00:45:28.320 just looking
00:45:28.680 for something else.
00:45:31.500 And then
00:45:32.200 the point of that
00:45:33.560 is that he would think
00:45:34.500 oh
00:45:34.980 is this guy
00:45:35.580 looking at me
00:45:36.100 because I'm on my phone?
00:45:37.120 but there would be
00:45:38.580 some ambiguity there
00:45:39.780 because maybe
00:45:40.540 I was just looking
00:45:41.180 at something else.
00:45:42.600 But maybe on his own
00:45:43.900 he would think
00:45:44.920 oh shoot
00:45:45.580 he might have been
00:45:46.440 looking at me
00:45:46.960 because I'm on my phone
00:45:47.760 I better make this short.
00:45:49.440 But that didn't
00:45:50.120 make any difference.
00:45:51.300 He was clearly
00:45:51.960 engaged in a long
00:45:53.360 phone call.
00:45:54.380 So then I had to do
00:45:55.060 the second look around
00:45:56.060 and you know
00:45:57.020 the second look around
00:45:57.940 you add a little attitude.
00:46:00.540 So that one
00:46:00.980 looks like this.
00:46:01.680 Got that one?
00:46:08.020 Yeah it's the stink eye.
00:46:09.080 It's the stink eye.
00:46:10.220 But the stink eye
00:46:11.180 didn't make any
00:46:11.740 difference either.
00:46:14.180 I went for the
00:46:15.200 full turnaround.
00:46:18.360 So next I had to go.
00:46:26.200 Full turnaround
00:46:27.020 no difference.
00:46:29.420 Just continued
00:46:30.240 with this phone call.
00:46:32.120 So now I said to myself
00:46:33.380 well
00:46:33.680 I'm not going to
00:46:36.420 make a thing about this.
00:46:38.220 I'm just going to
00:46:38.920 pack up my laptop
00:46:39.760 and call it a day
00:46:40.780 and I'm just going to
00:46:41.860 write the day off
00:46:42.680 and literally
00:46:43.180 I'm going to go back to bed.
00:46:45.700 Because
00:46:46.060 this is not a fight
00:46:48.160 I need.
00:46:49.340 It's not like
00:46:50.060 I'm some kind of Karen.
00:46:51.800 You know
00:46:52.000 it's not like
00:46:53.180 I'm going to cause
00:46:53.720 a scene in a public place.
00:46:57.020 So as I was
00:46:57.880 packing up my laptop
00:46:58.740 I was feeling my
00:46:59.820 willpower
00:47:01.320 and self-control
00:47:02.280 if you imagine
00:47:03.400 it's starting at 100%.
00:47:04.740 It already was down
00:47:05.980 to about 75%.
00:47:07.460 But that's plenty.
00:47:09.860 And that's a lot
00:47:10.380 of willpower
00:47:10.860 75%.
00:47:11.780 No problem.
00:47:12.820 But as I was
00:47:13.540 getting ready
00:47:14.700 to gather up
00:47:15.860 my garbage
00:47:16.360 to throw it away
00:47:17.120 I feel it
00:47:18.300 crossed the 50%
00:47:19.700 threshold
00:47:20.160 and I still
00:47:21.280 wasn't gone.
00:47:21.940 and I thought
00:47:23.780 uh-oh.
00:47:27.400 And then it
00:47:27.900 kept dropping.
00:47:29.260 It hit about
00:47:29.620 25%,
00:47:30.440 10%
00:47:31.000 and I thought
00:47:31.540 oh shit.
00:47:37.080 I'm about
00:47:37.780 five seconds away
00:47:38.840 from Hulk
00:47:39.460 smash
00:47:40.120 and I don't
00:47:41.700 have
00:47:41.960 anywhere to
00:47:42.540 stop it.
00:47:43.080 so a conversation
00:47:47.740 ensued.
00:47:50.660 You didn't
00:47:51.460 enjoy it.
00:47:54.960 I went
00:47:55.740 full Karen.
00:47:56.340 I think
00:48:00.140 I don't remember
00:48:01.200 everything I said
00:48:02.120 because sometimes
00:48:02.900 when you get angry
00:48:03.720 you don't remember
00:48:04.280 what you said
00:48:04.820 but I do remember
00:48:06.620 this part
00:48:07.200 and it went
00:48:08.560 like this.
00:48:10.260 Of this entire
00:48:11.440 neighborhood
00:48:11.940 there is only
00:48:13.040 one place
00:48:13.760 you shouldn't
00:48:14.200 be making
00:48:14.580 that phone call.
00:48:15.720 Right there.
00:48:16.880 Right where you are.
00:48:17.940 This is the only
00:48:18.700 place
00:48:19.100 you should not
00:48:19.840 be doing that.
00:48:21.880 But he told me
00:48:22.700 that was my opinion.
00:48:23.540 Now I tweeted
00:48:27.840 about it
00:48:28.320 because I wanted
00:48:28.780 to see other
00:48:29.240 people's opinions.
00:48:30.420 I was wondering
00:48:31.260 if other people
00:48:32.000 would say
00:48:32.380 hey live
00:48:33.040 and let live
00:48:33.740 there's no rule
00:48:35.040 against making
00:48:35.560 a phone call.
00:48:37.900 But here's my
00:48:38.780 take on this
00:48:39.380 and of course
00:48:40.140 I've owned
00:48:40.840 a couple of
00:48:41.220 restaurants
00:48:41.640 so I'm
00:48:42.520 triggered by
00:48:43.240 cell phones
00:48:44.160 in restaurants.
00:48:45.360 There is no
00:48:46.580 situation
00:48:47.260 where using
00:48:48.640 your phone
00:48:49.220 where other
00:48:49.740 people are
00:48:50.500 in a social
00:48:51.240 situation
00:48:51.920 is okay.
00:48:54.120 It's not
00:48:54.940 okay in the
00:48:55.420 movie theater.
00:48:56.300 It's not
00:48:57.040 okay in the
00:48:57.520 restaurant.
00:48:58.540 I understand
00:48:59.580 that people
00:49:00.220 do make
00:49:00.720 phone calls
00:49:01.340 more often
00:49:02.280 as Starbucks.
00:49:03.900 I get that.
00:49:04.980 But like I said
00:49:05.800 short ones
00:49:07.140 short ones
00:49:08.620 no problem
00:49:09.980 at all.
00:49:11.100 Right.
00:49:11.720 But if you
00:49:12.820 get on there
00:49:13.320 and you stay
00:49:13.920 on there
00:49:14.300 I think you
00:49:14.940 don't understand
00:49:16.020 how much
00:49:17.300 annoying that is.
00:49:18.780 Somebody tried
00:49:19.300 to tell me
00:49:19.720 that the problem
00:49:20.320 was on my end
00:49:21.420 because it really
00:49:22.080 was just an opinion
00:49:22.920 of who was
00:49:23.440 right and
00:49:23.760 wrong,
00:49:23.940 who was
00:49:24.140 wrong.
00:49:24.960 To which I
00:49:25.440 say really
00:49:25.960 would fingernails
00:49:28.640 on a chalkboard
00:49:29.840 be my opinion
00:49:31.580 that it bothers
00:49:32.240 me?
00:49:33.500 Is that an opinion?
00:49:34.420 If I were to
00:49:35.140 piss on your
00:49:35.700 fucking salad
00:49:36.600 is it your
00:49:38.200 opinion that it
00:49:39.160 doesn't taste
00:49:39.620 good?
00:49:40.680 Is that an
00:49:41.100 opinion?
00:49:42.120 No.
00:49:42.560 Some things
00:49:42.940 are not a
00:49:43.360 fucking opinion.
00:49:44.840 Some things
00:49:45.380 are just cause
00:49:46.040 and effect.
00:49:47.120 And we know
00:49:47.840 from science
00:49:48.900 that listening
00:49:49.920 to one
00:49:50.420 side of
00:49:50.800 a phone
00:49:51.120 call
00:49:51.320 will make
00:49:51.780 you insane
00:49:52.820 if it's
00:49:54.740 blocking you
00:49:55.340 from doing
00:49:55.700 what you
00:49:55.980 want to do
00:49:56.340 especially.
00:49:57.300 So there's
00:49:57.860 no doubt
00:49:58.320 about the
00:49:58.860 cause and
00:49:59.340 effect.
00:50:00.500 And if you
00:50:00.920 pretend you
00:50:01.640 don't know
00:50:02.140 that,
00:50:02.720 you're an
00:50:03.160 asshole.
00:50:04.360 I'm sorry.
00:50:05.380 If you
00:50:05.780 pretend you're
00:50:06.460 not aware
00:50:07.180 of how much
00:50:08.220 of a
00:50:08.860 fingers on
00:50:09.880 the chalkboard
00:50:10.480 it is to
00:50:10.900 have a phone
00:50:11.360 call in front
00:50:11.940 of somebody,
00:50:13.400 you are a
00:50:14.780 fucking
00:50:15.080 asshole.
00:50:16.100 And if
00:50:16.500 this is the
00:50:17.260 first time
00:50:17.640 you're
00:50:17.800 hearing
00:50:18.000 about it,
00:50:20.680 you know,
00:50:21.100 fine.
00:50:22.160 Now I'm
00:50:22.440 going to
00:50:22.700 save one
00:50:25.860 story.
00:50:26.580 Remind me
00:50:27.360 on locals.
00:50:28.880 I'm going
00:50:29.140 to save you
00:50:29.560 one phone
00:50:30.040 call story
00:50:30.520 just for
00:50:30.880 locals.
00:50:32.060 There's
00:50:32.280 one I
00:50:32.580 can't tell
00:50:33.000 in public.
00:50:34.440 All right.
00:50:35.320 But let's
00:50:36.020 just say
00:50:36.460 this phone
00:50:37.860 call in
00:50:38.320 public
00:50:38.620 situation.
00:50:40.800 I've been
00:50:41.400 dealing with
00:50:41.840 this a little
00:50:42.280 bit, so I've
00:50:43.540 got some
00:50:43.820 experience here.
00:50:45.900 Anyway.
00:50:47.260 That, ladies
00:50:47.820 and gentlemen,
00:50:48.280 is all I
00:50:48.820 wanted to
00:50:49.140 say.
00:50:50.180 Is there
00:50:50.500 anything you'd
00:50:51.060 like to hear
00:50:52.260 about?
00:50:52.660 Was he
00:50:53.180 brown?
00:50:54.080 No, he
00:50:54.520 was a
00:50:55.360 white frat
00:50:56.160 boy looking
00:50:56.600 guy.
00:50:58.120 Slick back
00:50:58.820 hair.
00:50:59.580 Maybe a
00:50:59.980 real estate
00:51:00.360 guy.
00:51:01.200 I don't
00:51:01.420 know.
00:51:02.920 Not sure.
00:51:04.680 I hope I'm
00:51:05.240 still welcome
00:51:05.700 back in
00:51:06.100 Starbucks.
00:51:08.280 All right.
00:51:08.960 Anything else
00:51:09.540 I forgot?
00:51:12.620 Did I
00:51:13.440 miss any
00:51:14.120 topics?
00:51:17.260 I'll give
00:51:18.700 you the
00:51:18.900 rest of
00:51:19.180 the story
00:51:19.500 on locals.
00:51:23.200 Do you
00:51:23.520 see a
00:51:23.720 take on
00:51:24.420 the
00:51:24.680 Schiff
00:51:25.040 censure
00:51:25.740 might
00:51:26.480 change
00:51:26.820 your
00:51:26.960 mind?
00:51:27.860 I don't
00:51:28.460 think so.
00:51:29.320 There's
00:51:29.760 no way I'd
00:51:30.340 be in
00:51:31.380 favor of
00:51:31.980 a large
00:51:32.780 fine.
00:51:33.860 I just
00:51:34.200 don't want
00:51:35.040 the members
00:51:35.420 of Congress
00:51:35.920 voting fines
00:51:37.360 for each
00:51:37.740 other.
00:51:38.820 I'm just
00:51:39.160 not cool
00:51:39.640 with that.
00:51:40.380 So there's
00:51:40.740 nothing you
00:51:41.140 could tell
00:51:41.440 me that
00:51:41.660 would change
00:51:41.940 my mind
00:51:42.340 on that.
00:51:42.660 I don't
00:51:44.380 think so
00:51:44.760 anyway.
00:51:46.420 All right.
00:51:47.100 We talked
00:51:47.640 about Tucker.
00:51:50.500 MTG was
00:51:51.200 snubbed by
00:51:51.960 Trump on
00:51:52.600 the runway.
00:51:53.180 I don't
00:51:53.360 know anything
00:51:53.680 about that.
00:52:00.340 You know,
00:52:00.860 I don't
00:52:01.060 mind people
00:52:01.520 who talk
00:52:01.880 too loud
00:52:02.280 in a
00:52:02.560 restaurant.
00:52:03.540 That doesn't
00:52:04.060 bother me
00:52:04.400 too much.
00:52:05.800 I understand
00:52:06.640 why it
00:52:06.960 bothers other
00:52:07.400 people,
00:52:07.920 but personally
00:52:08.560 it doesn't
00:52:08.900 bother me
00:52:09.220 too much.
00:52:11.920 All right.
00:52:13.040 Did he
00:52:13.360 know it
00:52:13.620 was me?
00:52:15.340 Oh,
00:52:15.840 that's a
00:52:16.220 good question.
00:52:17.920 I'm going
00:52:18.520 to say
00:52:19.260 not,
00:52:20.800 because when
00:52:21.400 people know
00:52:21.940 my job,
00:52:22.540 they treat
00:52:22.920 me differently.
00:52:24.360 So he
00:52:25.000 definitely
00:52:25.360 treated me
00:52:25.840 like a
00:52:26.880 Starbucks
00:52:27.420 patron.
00:52:30.140 All right.
00:52:31.180 That's all
00:52:31.760 I've got
00:52:31.920 now,
00:52:32.260 and I
00:52:32.500 will talk
00:52:32.980 to you,
00:52:33.460 YouTube,
00:52:34.700 tomorrow.
00:52:35.540 Thanks for
00:52:35.900 joining.
00:52:36.500 The best
00:52:36.900 live stream
00:52:37.340 ever.