Real Coffee with Scott Adams - June 23, 2023


Episode 2148 Scott Adams： Hunter's WhatsApp Message, Impeaching Biden, Imploding Subs, More


Episode Stats

Length

54 minutes

Words per Minute

141.00233

Word Count

7,754

Sentence Count

593

Misogynist Sentences

22

Hate Speech Sentences

31


Summary

In this episode of the highlight of human civilization and maybe some robots too, I talk about my recent trip to San Francisco and how I didn't see a single person. Also, I give my opinion on AI and why it's mostly bullshit.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Ba-ba.
00:00:01.420 Do-do-do-do-do-do.
00:00:04.460 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization and maybe some robots, too.
00:00:11.680 If you would like your experience today to be one that you'll talk about to your grandchildren,
00:00:17.460 well, all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or gels, a stein, a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind,
00:00:23.880 except for a small submersible submarine.
00:00:26.900 Apparently, they don't hold water too well.
00:00:30.000 But if you'd like to raise up your experience to dopamine faucet,
00:00:35.920 all you need is to take this simultaneous sip, and it happens now, go.
00:00:43.140 Ah.
00:00:45.100 Ah.
00:00:47.020 I would like to make an announcement.
00:00:51.000 I'd like to make an announcement.
00:00:54.120 Should I ever perish in a humorous way?
00:01:00.600 At least in your opinion.
00:01:02.420 I give you full authority to laugh about it.
00:01:05.660 You may make insensitive jokes.
00:01:09.560 And I would be, I don't know, I feel I would be honored by that.
00:01:13.120 So if you don't mind, should I die in any way that looks amusing, like a bear attack?
00:01:20.940 Like if a bear kills me?
00:01:23.220 That's kind of funny.
00:01:25.640 I mean, really?
00:01:26.940 It's kind of funny.
00:01:27.640 What was I doing fighting a bear?
00:01:29.160 Really?
00:01:29.440 Or if some, you know, horrible, strange accident, you know, somebody drives a car into my house,
00:01:36.360 something like that, you have my permission to enjoy the hell out of it.
00:01:40.860 I'll be dead anyway.
00:01:42.380 I mean, if I'm dead, why should I ruin your fun?
00:01:45.360 So go ahead and have a good time with it.
00:01:48.020 All right.
00:01:48.720 Here's my San Francisco report.
00:01:51.340 I was not looking forward to going into San Francisco for the first time in three years.
00:01:59.560 I live just outside of San Francisco, and I think I've avoided it for three years, which
00:02:06.280 is hard.
00:02:06.840 If you live near it, you always have some reason to go there.
00:02:10.020 But I did want to catch up with a friend, so I went in for lunch.
00:02:14.840 And as you've heard, the streets are covered with poop and criminality and drug abuse in
00:02:21.620 tents.
00:02:22.460 I didn't see any of it.
00:02:24.420 I didn't see a single thing.
00:02:25.920 I did not see, didn't see a homeless person, didn't see a criminal, didn't see a tent,
00:02:33.180 didn't see a poop on the sidewalk.
00:02:35.100 Nothing.
00:02:37.560 So does that surprise you?
00:02:42.500 Are you surprised?
00:02:44.100 And then we took a long walk, pretty long walk from, you know, one place to a place to
00:02:49.960 eat.
00:02:51.180 And no problem.
00:02:53.620 Nothing looked dangerous.
00:02:54.600 Didn't see any sketchy people.
00:02:59.400 All right.
00:03:00.820 Full disclosure.
00:03:02.560 I was in the best part of town.
00:03:05.200 Right.
00:03:05.920 Pretty sure there's, I'm pretty sure there's like a 10 block area that there's nothing going
00:03:10.480 wrong.
00:03:11.800 I don't know about the rest of the city.
00:03:13.680 The rest of the city is probably a sewer, according to other people.
00:03:17.500 But if you go to the rich part, it's all the same.
00:03:22.400 It's all the same.
00:03:24.220 I don't think too much goes wrong in the rich part of San Francisco.
00:03:29.480 All right.
00:03:30.120 Here's my opinion on AI, having experienced it for a while, having signed up for many AI
00:03:38.120 apps and having used many of them.
00:03:41.040 It looks like mostly bullshit to me.
00:03:43.420 Mostly bullshit.
00:03:44.700 Now, when I say that, don't take that out of context.
00:03:47.980 Of course, AI and its contribution to how we work will be gigantic.
00:03:55.700 All right.
00:03:56.140 So what I say next is not, is not conflicting with the fact that AI will be gigantic, gigantic
00:04:03.780 in its effect.
00:04:05.040 However, I can make the following assessments right now.
00:04:11.680 Not once this week did I want to use an AI tool for anything.
00:04:16.240 Not once.
00:04:17.840 And I've used them, you know, I've signed up for a bunch.
00:04:21.060 I've used them, just to see what they can do.
00:04:23.100 But not once have I said to myself, I've got to go back there and use that.
00:04:26.880 The exception would be, you know, Googling for just a text answer for something.
00:04:31.780 I do use that.
00:04:32.660 So I have used the ChatGPT to answer some complex questions.
00:04:37.600 It's really good for that.
00:04:38.660 I love it for that.
00:04:40.380 But, you know, I just saw that MidJourney came out with a new update that you can not
00:04:46.140 only do amazing pictures, but now you can zoom into them, like, and get detail in the
00:04:51.400 zoom in, like, like new detail that wasn't there before.
00:04:55.220 That's crazy.
00:04:56.660 And I said to myself, my God, what an update that is.
00:04:59.500 That is so impressive.
00:05:00.400 And then I said to myself, when would I ever use that?
00:05:06.100 For what?
00:05:08.640 I don't know.
00:05:10.060 Can't think of anything.
00:05:13.640 So 90% of everything that AI does is done by people who do things you can't do.
00:05:21.700 You got that?
00:05:22.300 90% of everything you see on social media is like, hey, look, it can do this.
00:05:26.980 It can do this.
00:05:27.820 It can do this.
00:05:29.140 But you can't do that.
00:05:31.020 You can't do that.
00:05:32.260 In order to do that, you would have to learn a new language.
00:05:36.680 You would have to learn this language called Super Prompt.
00:05:39.360 Because if you didn't know that language, do you think you could make that cool, cool photo?
00:05:45.220 Nope.
00:05:46.760 Nope.
00:05:47.380 You'd have to learn a whole new language in order to ask the right questions to create good pictures,
00:05:52.620 which nobody really needs.
00:05:53.940 I mean, impressive pictures, the value of an impressive picture just went to zero.
00:06:01.660 You know that, right?
00:06:03.240 The market value of a really impressive image is now zero, because anybody can make one.
00:06:11.240 So I'm not even sure people will care if you made a good image, because they're all going to be worth a zero in our minds.
00:06:17.080 So mostly it's about people who can do things that you can't do, doing demos on social media to make you think that you could do those things,
00:06:29.600 but you really can't, because it would be too much to learn, and you've got a real life to live,
00:06:33.940 and you're not going to dedicate your entire day to learning an AI prompt.
00:06:38.200 But the people who do the demos, they did.
00:06:40.980 They put their whole week into putting together a little package that they could make a thread on Twitter.
00:06:47.440 They're not you.
00:06:48.780 You can't do that.
00:06:50.720 You're not even close.
00:06:53.240 All right.
00:06:54.480 If you've tried to use AI for anything but just asking questions, would you agree that my assessment is on point?
00:07:03.840 I don't see any disagreement, but we'll see.
00:07:07.100 All right.
00:07:08.940 Apparently, I saw a headline, and I wasn't sure which way this would go.
00:07:13.100 Starbucks employees are, let's see, 150 unionized Starbucks, so they're not all unionized.
00:07:20.080 But where they are, 150 of them are going on strike over the coffee chain's policy for pride decorations.
00:07:27.320 Now, how do you think that story is going to go?
00:07:32.000 Which way?
00:07:33.680 They're on strike over pride decorations.
00:07:38.120 Are they on strike because they have them, or are they on strike because they don't have enough of them?
00:07:45.040 Which is it?
00:07:46.820 On strike because they have them, or on strike because they don't have enough of it?
00:07:52.900 Not enough.
00:07:53.780 Yeah, the answer is not enough.
00:07:55.940 So there's some, let's say, ambiguity in the story because it sounds like the people going on strike don't know that the thing they're asking for they already have.
00:08:08.400 Which is, they have the authority to put up pride decorations in their store.
00:08:15.380 So I think corporate office says, yeah, go ahead.
00:08:18.440 Put up pride decorations if you want to.
00:08:21.400 And then the unionized people are going on strike for not being allowed to put on pride decorations, which the corporate office says, yeah, go ahead.
00:08:30.240 I don't know.
00:08:31.100 I don't really understand the story, but that's the way it's presented.
00:08:34.120 That the strike has nothing to do with reality.
00:08:38.200 Maybe.
00:08:39.240 I don't know.
00:08:40.020 Something wrong with the story.
00:08:42.920 Here's my take on Pride Month.
00:08:48.400 As my regular audience knows, I'm very pro-LGBTQ.
00:08:54.560 I love my LGBTQ people.
00:08:57.400 They're interesting.
00:08:58.140 They generally are low-crime people who follow the Constitution.
00:09:03.760 Patriots all love them.
00:09:06.520 But like anything, like anything, things can go too far.
00:09:11.200 Wouldn't you agree?
00:09:12.400 I have now some advice for my much-beloved LGBTQ community.
00:09:19.460 This is constructive advice.
00:09:22.000 It's not meant to be any kind of a criticism.
00:09:25.940 Just constructive advice.
00:09:28.320 Correct me if I'm wrong, but a big part of Pride Month is not just how the people in the community feel about each other or themselves.
00:09:37.180 It's also a branding exercise to make sure that the rest of the public has a positive point of view.
00:09:46.500 And I like that part.
00:09:48.660 But here's my observation about Pride Month, which seems off-brand for the LGBTQ community.
00:09:55.640 Because generally you expect the LGBT community to be sort of a leading edge in fashion and, you know, just sort of what's new.
00:10:05.640 You know, sort of the leading edge of what's next.
00:10:08.140 But I feel like Pride Month is dated.
00:10:11.980 Does anybody have that feeling?
00:10:13.620 That Pride Month made perfect sense for a long time.
00:10:17.420 But now it just feels, it feels like unnecessary.
00:10:20.580 Because I feel like we're well past the point of, you know, are you a member of America?
00:10:29.640 Are you a, you know, a full, fully respected member of the community?
00:10:35.320 Of course.
00:10:36.140 Yeah.
00:10:36.580 At least for most of us.
00:10:38.160 And it feels like you don't want to do Pride Month until the very last person agrees with you.
00:10:45.020 That would be too far.
00:10:47.240 You want to stop when you get the benefits before it starts being a cost.
00:10:53.360 And it feels to me like Pride Month did its work.
00:10:57.600 I feel like it did its job and did it well.
00:11:00.360 You know, raised consciousness and all that.
00:11:04.280 But does anybody else feel like it just, the Pride concept feels dated?
00:11:11.640 Doesn't it feel dated?
00:11:13.980 It's almost like calling black people Negroes.
00:11:18.040 It's like, I like, I feel like we've gone past that.
00:11:21.940 There are, you know, new set of challenges.
00:11:24.340 But it feels like Pride?
00:11:27.060 I mean, Pride doesn't even seem like the right word, does it?
00:11:29.820 Because why should anybody be proud about their sexuality, no matter what it is?
00:11:36.980 Are you proud to be heterosexual?
00:11:39.360 I don't know.
00:11:39.960 I just am.
00:11:41.480 It's not something I'm proud of.
00:11:43.700 I just am.
00:11:45.460 I'm not proud of anything about anything that I was born.
00:11:49.560 Am I proud to be white?
00:11:51.620 No.
00:11:52.620 I didn't have a choice.
00:11:54.200 Am I proud to be my age?
00:11:57.460 No.
00:11:58.780 I mean, I didn't have a choice about any of it.
00:12:01.500 So I'm not really proud about anything I don't have a choice about.
00:12:04.700 It's just what it is.
00:12:06.440 And I think society is pretty close to my opinion on that.
00:12:09.880 It's just what it is.
00:12:11.780 You know, if you're not breaking the law, we're all good.
00:12:16.540 All right.
00:12:17.780 We'll get into the politics in a moment.
00:12:19.880 So Bo Burt, Representative Bo Burt, who is just one of the Burt's, not a Dilbert, not
00:12:26.480 a Ratbert, not a Catbert, not a Dogbert, she is a Bo Burt, and she's pushing this impeachment
00:12:33.200 over Joe Biden over the border.
00:12:36.120 It's political theater that even Newt Gingrich says is a bad idea.
00:12:41.660 If Newt Gingrich says an impeachment is a bad idea, I'd listen to him.
00:12:47.200 Yeah, I would listen to Newt Gingrich when he says it's a bad idea.
00:12:51.920 He's still one of the smartest people in the game.
00:12:55.240 And he knows a little bit about impeachment because he was behind the Clinton impeachment.
00:13:00.840 And he basically says they're not ready.
00:13:03.380 You know, they don't really have a case.
00:13:04.940 And the worst thing you could do is bring an impeachment if you don't have the goods.
00:13:08.320 And they don't really have the goods.
00:13:09.640 They certainly have a complaint that Biden is opening the border too much, but you probably
00:13:16.720 need more than that.
00:13:18.520 I mean, just not doing a good enough job isn't what they do impeachment for.
00:13:23.680 That feels like it's more in the political domain than the impeachment domain.
00:13:27.680 But we'll see what happens.
00:13:29.300 It's just political theater, I guess.
00:13:31.000 I doubt it will go anywhere.
00:13:32.040 As you know, the male sperm count, well, I shouldn't say male, should I?
00:13:40.740 I'll just say the sperm count.
00:13:43.320 Look how modern I am.
00:13:45.600 Look how woke I am.
00:13:47.580 The male or female sperm count is going down every, seems like, for years it's been going
00:13:57.640 down and it's still a bit of a, bit of a mystery, but I'd like to add my own hypothesis here.
00:14:04.280 Now the, the primary hypothesis is there's something in the air or the food.
00:14:11.060 So we're either drinking something or breathing something or we're exposed to something.
00:14:15.860 I don't know, it could be microplastics in the water or something.
00:14:19.620 But whatever it is, it seems that the sperm count has been going down for a long time.
00:14:26.880 I would like to offer you the following highly speculative hypotheses.
00:14:31.200 You ready?
00:14:32.660 Number one, I hypothesize that women, well, I hypothesize that if we were in a more dangerous
00:14:42.820 climate, the sperm would go up.
00:14:47.500 In other words, if people were being slain in the streets, you know, more than they are,
00:14:53.280 that the natural instinct of human beings would be to increase reproduction.
00:15:00.320 Now there's weak evidence, it's very weak evidence, that during wartime women will give
00:15:06.300 birth to slightly more boys than girls.
00:15:09.840 But I just checked that, and apparently the science for that is not firm.
00:15:14.040 There's some indication of a small effect, but it's not always, and so I wouldn't call that science.
00:15:19.320 But it does make sense from a biological perspective that if you knew you needed more people, because
00:15:28.540 it looked like people were dying too much, and life was hard, you'd probably have more sperm
00:15:34.280 count.
00:15:35.700 So just a hypothesis, something you could test.
00:15:39.220 But here's my other hypothesis.
00:15:42.900 Women are less sexy.
00:15:44.280 So men are not triggered to produce sperm.
00:15:50.820 Here's why.
00:15:55.840 And by the way, I'm not saying that's bad.
00:15:59.220 Just to be clear, I'm not saying that's bad.
00:16:02.540 Because in the 70s, when I was working in the cubicle environment, if a woman got dressed
00:16:09.580 for work, it looked a lot like getting dressed to go on a date, didn't it?
00:16:16.120 Getting dressed for work in the 70s looked a lot like getting dressed for a date.
00:16:21.760 You got the high heels and the tight dress, and you might even have a little cleavage at work.
00:16:28.600 In my day job, when I worked at the bank, in my 20s, I'd have a heart on half of the day.
00:16:39.380 Let me be frank.
00:16:40.960 I would just walk down the hall, and there was just so many hot women who were of reproductive
00:16:45.940 age.
00:16:47.180 You were just basically boning out all day long in your 20s.
00:16:51.100 Like, all day long, I'd be sitting in my cubicle saying, all right, I can't get up for
00:16:54.880 10 minutes, because I just walked past what's-her-name, right?
00:17:00.700 Any guys want to back me up on that?
00:17:03.700 And now if you go into a modern workplace, what do the women look like?
00:17:08.760 And again, this is not any kind of criticism, because I don't think women should dress like
00:17:13.180 hookers to go to work.
00:17:16.440 I'm not saying that.
00:17:17.940 I'm not saying it was better in the 70s.
00:17:20.620 You know, maybe the men liked it better.
00:17:22.460 I'm not saying it was better overall.
00:17:24.140 You know, you don't want to send your daughter into that situation, right?
00:17:28.040 So I'm not saying it was good.
00:17:29.880 I'm saying it was different.
00:17:31.940 And if you turned on a beer commercial, what did it look like?
00:17:35.800 Women in bikinis.
00:17:37.760 Beer commercial.
00:17:39.000 If you turned on a sitcom, was there always a hot woman with cleavage?
00:17:44.780 Pretty much.
00:17:45.740 Pretty much every time, right?
00:17:48.300 How about today?
00:17:49.940 Not so much.
00:17:51.440 Not so much.
00:17:52.140 Different priorities.
00:17:54.140 So, if you went to a modern workplace, and you looked at the women who worked here, and
00:18:00.940 again, this is no criticism.
00:18:03.360 Legitimately, this is not a criticism.
00:18:05.380 They would be dressed probably comfortably, wouldn't you say?
00:18:09.080 In a modern, let's say, high-tech environment, they would just be dressed comfortably.
00:18:12.920 What are the odds that they would be wearing high heels?
00:18:15.160 If you go to Google and walk down the hallway, how many of the female employees are wearing heels?
00:18:23.620 Probably not too many.
00:18:25.460 Some.
00:18:26.960 Right?
00:18:27.100 And you would have a lot more people going full non-binary and everything else.
00:18:33.760 So, I feel like, as a male, I'm far less exposed to casual environmental triggers.
00:18:44.180 Men?
00:18:47.080 Men, true or false?
00:18:48.480 You are less exposed to environmental triggers all day long.
00:18:52.840 True?
00:18:54.020 Now, some of you are going to say, I'm getting just all yeses on that.
00:18:58.760 Oh, one false.
00:18:59.680 One false.
00:19:00.600 Now, some of you are going to push back and say, but what about porn?
00:19:04.500 In today's world, we have unlimited access to porn.
00:19:08.880 Wouldn't that be triggering us all day long?
00:19:11.820 Yes.
00:19:12.860 Yes, it would.
00:19:14.080 It triggers you, and then you take care of it, and then you go on with your day.
00:19:19.460 But apparently, the science shows that masturbation does not lower your sperm count.
00:19:24.600 It doesn't change it at all.
00:19:26.100 So, it lowers it for an hour, and you're good to go.
00:19:30.080 So, the fact that masturbation exists and porn exists at higher levels than ever before
00:19:37.640 doesn't seem to have an impact on sperm levels, scientifically.
00:19:42.440 But if you tell me that walking around an environment with no sexual cues
00:19:47.540 is going to give me the same sperm count as walking through an environment
00:19:52.240 that's only sexual cues, just everywhere, I can't believe that.
00:19:57.160 It seems to me my sperm count would go up if I were in a target-rich environment.
00:20:06.000 So, I'm going to say probably the biggest reason that sperm count is down
00:20:11.940 is probably environmental.
00:20:14.360 It's probably what we're eating.
00:20:16.260 It's probably what we're breathing, I think, to the water.
00:20:20.500 But I think it might be a little bit these other things.
00:20:24.080 Maybe a little bit these other things.
00:20:26.160 Diet, yeah.
00:20:27.160 All right, I have an opinion that will be provocative.
00:20:33.380 You know, on social media, it seems like twice a week,
00:20:38.480 there'll be some viral video of a group of people,
00:20:41.940 usually youngish males, beating up one person.
00:20:47.540 Now, you're going to want to make this racial,
00:20:50.020 but that's not where I'm going on this.
00:20:52.580 Well, not exactly.
00:20:53.400 Because a group of people beating up one person is equally bad,
00:20:59.460 no matter who's doing the beating, right?
00:21:02.980 But when it turns out that the people doing the beating are all the same racial group,
00:21:08.180 and it's different from the person who's being beaten,
00:21:10.960 I would not call that normal crime.
00:21:16.100 I would call that recreational racial torture.
00:21:21.400 Recreational racial torture.
00:21:25.940 Because when you watch the videos, it's clear they're doing it for fun.
00:21:29.480 They don't have any purpose.
00:21:30.700 There's nothing gained.
00:21:31.520 They're not robbing anybody.
00:21:33.180 They're not in trouble.
00:21:35.100 They're laughing, and they're enjoying it recreationally.
00:21:38.120 Now, the videos I've seen, they're quite clearly also racial,
00:21:44.940 meaning that it looks like the person getting beaten up is because they're white,
00:21:49.100 or because they're Asian American.
00:21:51.920 But I don't want to make this a racial case per se, not in one direction anyway.
00:21:57.980 Because let me be as clear as possible.
00:22:01.000 If I saw a video of 10 white people torturing, basically torturing,
00:22:08.260 by taking turns beating a black guy,
00:22:10.680 I would want all of those white people involved in that murdered.
00:22:16.820 Murdered.
00:22:17.600 I'd want them all dead, right?
00:22:19.980 No qualifications whatsoever.
00:22:25.040 If I had heard that somebody came up with a high-powered rifle
00:22:28.500 and killed every one of those white people,
00:22:31.160 torturing somebody recreationally, recreationally, for fun.
00:22:37.640 Imagine a bunch of white people torturing a black guy for fun.
00:22:42.140 I would want every one of those black people murdered immediately.
00:22:46.220 Just blow their fucking heads off.
00:22:48.060 Kill them.
00:22:49.360 Absolutely just kill them.
00:22:51.040 I don't even want a trial for those bastards.
00:22:54.140 But it works both ways, right?
00:22:56.820 It's not even a racial statement.
00:22:59.900 If you see any group of one group enjoying themselves beating up somebody of another group,
00:23:05.420 that's not like regular crime.
00:23:08.940 You know, you could have a racial event if it's just one person on one.
00:23:13.620 But if you're torturing somebody,
00:23:16.180 because these beatings are just torture.
00:23:18.640 They're torture.
00:23:19.380 It's an extended period in which they're just trying to hurt somebody as much as possible
00:23:25.200 and permanently.
00:23:27.900 They're clearly not trying to avoid permanent damage.
00:23:31.540 You know, a lifetime of crippling, you know, problems.
00:23:36.300 You know, brain injuries, everything else.
00:23:38.360 So if you tell me that this is a normal crime,
00:23:42.360 when a group of people recreationally tortures somebody of another race,
00:23:47.640 because they're another race, primarily,
00:23:51.940 that should be the death penalty.
00:23:55.040 That should absolutely be the death penalty.
00:23:58.180 But, like I said, if some vigilante wanted to take care of it,
00:24:03.360 I would consider that justice as well.
00:24:05.380 And it wouldn't matter, again, you can reverse the races.
00:24:10.260 Same opinion.
00:24:12.300 Same opinion.
00:24:13.580 If it were white people, they should all be killed.
00:24:17.400 All right.
00:24:18.320 Bud Light commercial.
00:24:20.500 I had to ask on social media if this was a prank,
00:24:24.240 because I couldn't believe it.
00:24:27.060 Now, you're going to have to see this fucking thing yourself.
00:24:29.980 You have to see what Bud Light did
00:24:32.020 to try to get back its audience.
00:24:33.860 It did a commercial with a bunch of redneck white people
00:24:37.840 doing dumb-ass things.
00:24:40.620 Just like one dumb-ass thing after another,
00:24:43.180 humorously.
00:24:44.380 Humorously being stupid.
00:24:46.580 Now, it did show one person of color.
00:24:49.900 It literally had one black friend.
00:24:52.840 They actually made a video of a bunch of dumb,
00:24:55.540 redneck white people doing dumb shit,
00:24:58.040 and they actually had the gall
00:24:59.720 to give them one black friend.
00:25:01.860 Are you fucking kidding me?
00:25:04.440 I looked at that thing, and I thought,
00:25:06.120 this isn't real.
00:25:07.560 This is obviously somebody's joking around.
00:25:09.720 But it's very well-qualified.
00:25:10.620 The quality was good.
00:25:11.960 So I thought, wow.
00:25:13.200 Somebody put a lot of work into this fake.
00:25:16.520 And then I found out it's real.
00:25:18.840 It's real.
00:25:19.540 It cannot be described how offensive it is
00:25:25.600 to their own buyers.
00:25:28.100 Just completely offensive.
00:25:29.980 And did they not know it?
00:25:34.480 Do they need some kind of advisor?
00:25:37.600 I feel like Bud Light needs a redneck advisor.
00:25:41.220 Like, they should bring somebody in with a,
00:25:44.060 like a John Deere hat and a plaid shirt,
00:25:47.680 packing a few extra pounds,
00:25:49.200 just came from the barbecue,
00:25:50.560 and just use them as the expert advisor.
00:25:53.140 Because I imagine you put them in the room,
00:25:54.960 and then you show them that video,
00:25:56.720 and his face would be like this.
00:26:01.920 Seriously?
00:26:03.980 You're fucking with me, right?
00:26:05.220 You don't really think that's the commercial
00:26:07.700 you're going to put on, do you?
00:26:09.580 Seriously?
00:26:11.540 Like, all they needed was one objective opinion
00:26:14.600 from a customer.
00:26:16.420 And it feels like they wouldn't have done it.
00:26:19.540 All right, here's a little statistic I saw online.
00:26:21.520 I think it's real.
00:26:23.240 But, in fact, check me if it's not.
00:26:25.420 It was a list of countries,
00:26:27.760 and what percentage of them are unmarried,
00:26:33.140 but have kids.
00:26:34.720 So they have kids, but they're not married.
00:26:36.960 In Iceland, almost 70%
00:26:40.640 of the people who have children
00:26:43.940 are not married to each other
00:26:45.380 or anybody else.
00:26:48.020 France, 62%.
00:26:50.140 62% of French who have children
00:26:54.080 are not married.
00:26:56.060 62%.
00:26:56.860 Let me go down the list.
00:26:58.880 Bulgaria, 60%.
00:27:00.400 Norway, 59%.
00:27:02.100 Portugal, 58%.
00:27:03.860 Slovenia, 57%.
00:27:04.900 Sweden, 55%.
00:27:06.320 Denmark, 54%.
00:27:07.540 Now, where's all their problems?
00:27:16.320 Do they have any problems because of that?
00:27:18.320 Apparently not.
00:27:19.640 Now, I saw it in the comments,
00:27:21.000 some people saying that the reason
00:27:22.280 people don't get married
00:27:23.300 is that culturally it's just not required.
00:27:26.940 So there's no legal reason.
00:27:30.820 There's no financial benefit.
00:27:32.880 Apparently there's no financial benefit
00:27:34.560 in the other countries.
00:27:36.360 So if you don't have finances,
00:27:37.980 you don't have a cultural pressure,
00:27:40.320 so they just don't do it.
00:27:43.380 There's nobody saying,
00:27:44.880 why don't you get married every day?
00:27:46.200 Like the in-laws are not coming over
00:27:47.840 and saying,
00:27:48.640 so, when's the big date?
00:27:51.740 When are you getting married?
00:27:52.800 I guess it just doesn't happen.
00:27:54.000 Because people think,
00:27:56.280 yeah, and probably the paucity of religion.
00:28:01.080 Now, here's my question.
00:28:03.340 If we were to watch this experiment,
00:28:06.360 would we eventually say to ourselves,
00:28:08.880 well, no wonder France is
00:28:10.560 turned into a third world country.
00:28:15.100 I don't know that there are any problems in France.
00:28:17.700 Do you?
00:28:18.600 Does France have any kind of a problem
00:28:20.360 because of the unmarried people with children?
00:28:22.340 Do they?
00:28:24.720 What's the problem?
00:28:26.520 I mean, I know they have immigration issues,
00:28:28.660 but what's the problem?
00:28:34.520 Yeah, taxes, maybe taxes.
00:28:36.960 All right.
00:28:37.900 So anyway, that's happening.
00:28:40.480 I just thought that was,
00:28:41.540 that was just like a shocking number.
00:28:43.820 All right, we're of course going to talk about
00:28:45.220 the submarine story,
00:28:46.780 and of course everything has to do with Hunter Biden.
00:28:48.660 There's no story that doesn't go back to Hunter Biden.
00:28:53.780 This should be like a,
00:28:54.640 some kind of a Kevin Bacon situation.
00:28:58.820 The Hunter Biden is always one degree of separation
00:29:01.320 from every news story.
00:29:02.520 But as you've already heard,
00:29:05.980 no doubt the story,
00:29:07.740 the submarine met a bad end,
00:29:09.700 must have been some structural problem,
00:29:12.260 and at least the people died quickly, they think.
00:29:15.540 I guess that's the best you can say about it.
00:29:17.580 But I'm not too interested in that story.
00:29:21.940 I just don't find that story that interesting.
00:29:24.880 But apparently this story was coincidentally
00:29:27.480 at the same time some bad news came out about Hunter,
00:29:29.960 which we don't know if it's true yet,
00:29:33.180 but it's coming from a whistleblower.
00:29:35.020 And there is allegedly a WhatsApp message from Hunter
00:29:40.020 to his Chinese connection,
00:29:44.240 and it's pretty darn damning.
00:29:47.520 Let me read it to you.
00:29:49.980 So this is allegedly from a WhatsApp messaging from 2017
00:29:56.600 between Hunter Biden and this Henry Zhao,
00:30:00.900 his Chinese connection.
00:30:03.060 All right.
00:30:03.600 And so Biden apparently wrote,
00:30:06.220 quote,
00:30:06.660 I am sitting here with my father,
00:30:09.040 and remember, it's 2017.
00:30:11.580 All right.
00:30:12.180 So I'm sitting here with my father,
00:30:13.600 and we would like to understand
00:30:14.980 why the commitment made has not been fulfilled.
00:30:18.300 Tell the director that I would like to resolve this now
00:30:21.140 before it gets out of hand,
00:30:22.720 and now means tonight.
00:30:24.640 And Z,
00:30:25.020 if I get a call or text from anyone involved in this
00:30:28.180 other than you,
00:30:29.340 Zhang or the chairman,
00:30:31.080 I will make certain that between the man sitting next to me,
00:30:34.060 his father,
00:30:34.740 and every person he knows,
00:30:36.600 and my ability to forever hold a grudge,
00:30:39.340 that you will regret not following my direction.
00:30:42.220 I am sitting here waiting for the call with my father.
00:30:48.980 Is that too on the nose?
00:30:50.400 It doesn't sound like a fake phone call.
00:30:58.220 If it were fake,
00:31:00.120 it would mention the payments.
00:31:03.800 Right?
00:31:04.680 It's not quite on the nose.
00:31:06.460 The reason I think it's real
00:31:07.680 is that it's not on the nose.
00:31:10.140 On the nose would have said,
00:31:12.240 you promised us some payments for connections.
00:31:15.160 Where's the money?
00:31:15.920 That would be on the nose.
00:31:20.380 But here he's just making this threat
00:31:22.080 about his commitments.
00:31:24.440 So you can tell that,
00:31:25.480 you can tell the hunter knows
00:31:27.100 he doesn't want to say exactly what the commitments are,
00:31:29.800 so he knows it's discoverable.
00:31:31.640 You know,
00:31:31.840 ultimately it could be discovered.
00:31:33.660 So he's still,
00:31:34.360 he's still talking indirectly.
00:31:36.140 That's not on the nose.
00:31:38.420 This is the way real people talk in the real world.
00:31:41.340 That's why it's not on the nose.
00:31:42.740 It's messy.
00:31:45.160 It's a little unclear.
00:31:46.860 That's just like reality.
00:31:50.200 So anyway,
00:31:51.480 the whistleblowers are saying
00:31:52.780 that that's a real message.
00:31:55.400 They're saying that
00:31:56.240 they were,
00:31:57.400 they were limited from
00:32:01.120 asking any questions
00:32:02.520 about the big guy
00:32:03.660 or the dad.
00:32:04.900 They were prevented from
00:32:06.380 looking into Joe Biden connections.
00:32:09.080 So the story that came out,
00:32:10.860 at the same time,
00:32:12.020 the submarine story,
00:32:13.800 which by the way,
00:32:15.700 there's a sub story
00:32:17.160 about the sub story
00:32:18.160 on Substack.
00:32:21.360 Probably not,
00:32:22.220 but it should be on Substack.
00:32:25.340 That,
00:32:25.960 that the government knew on Sunday
00:32:28.720 that the,
00:32:29.640 the sub had been destroyed.
00:32:31.700 But they waited until the,
00:32:33.600 Hunter Biden story came out
00:32:35.820 so they could bury it in the news.
00:32:37.700 Did it work?
00:32:38.360 I don't know.
00:32:39.920 Let's,
00:32:40.120 let's see if it worked.
00:32:41.820 Let's see if I,
00:32:42.580 if I went to CNN,
00:32:44.260 would it be a big old news story
00:32:46.260 about Hunter Biden
00:32:47.520 and the whistleblower?
00:32:48.700 Let's see.
00:32:49.580 We'll go right to the web page.
00:32:53.840 Oh,
00:32:54.220 let's see.
00:32:54.520 Top story is about a submarine.
00:32:56.520 It's about a submarine.
00:32:58.100 Yeah,
00:32:58.320 that's the top story.
00:32:59.520 But I'm sure it's the second story.
00:33:01.560 I mean,
00:33:01.900 given,
00:33:02.200 given the nature of the claim,
00:33:04.040 it would obviously be
00:33:04.960 the second story.
00:33:06.300 No,
00:33:06.480 the second story is about the sub.
00:33:07.660 But we'll go down to the third.
00:33:10.540 The third story is about the sub.
00:33:12.400 But on the fourth story,
00:33:13.980 we get to,
00:33:14.400 okay,
00:33:14.660 that's about the sub.
00:33:15.740 But the fifth story,
00:33:17.180 fifth story down is about the sub.
00:33:20.880 Okay,
00:33:21.280 that's about the sub two.
00:33:22.940 That's about the sub.
00:33:25.040 Okay,
00:33:25.480 here's some news about government.
00:33:26.960 So this bit,
00:33:27.940 that's about Texas.
00:33:29.560 All right,
00:33:29.760 here's the news.
00:33:30.540 No,
00:33:30.960 that's not it.
00:33:33.240 But if I just keep going down,
00:33:34.720 I'll see it,
00:33:35.140 of course.
00:33:35.400 Okay.
00:33:37.660 Still looking.
00:33:41.820 I mean,
00:33:42.320 it's the biggest story of the day,
00:33:43.400 so obviously it's not there.
00:33:49.520 It's not there.
00:33:52.220 It's not just,
00:33:53.400 it's not just undercovered.
00:33:57.340 It's actually not there.
00:33:58.600 It's actually not there.
00:34:02.260 I mean,
00:34:02.500 just hold that in your mind for a moment.
00:34:05.660 We have written proof and testimony
00:34:08.220 that the president of the United States
00:34:10.040 was taking bribes from China.
00:34:14.520 It's not even anywhere on the CNN page.
00:34:18.460 Nowhere.
00:34:18.900 Now,
00:34:22.620 how about Fox News?
00:34:25.940 Now,
00:34:26.440 of course,
00:34:27.100 we'll cover the submarine as well.
00:34:29.980 Yeah,
00:34:30.160 so first story,
00:34:31.060 first story is about the submarine.
00:34:33.820 Second story,
00:34:35.860 whistleblower revealed.
00:34:40.240 Do you see the problem?
00:34:41.360 I mean,
00:34:46.060 how is this possible?
00:34:48.820 Like,
00:34:49.060 how are we okay with this?
00:34:51.560 Like,
00:34:51.880 you know,
00:34:52.480 we have outrage exhaustion.
00:34:57.520 You know,
00:34:58.140 so I'm outraged about this,
00:35:00.520 but I'm outraged about so many things,
00:35:03.320 I don't know where to begin.
00:35:04.520 So I don't do anything about this.
00:35:05.980 Like,
00:35:06.440 I'm not going to be active
00:35:07.600 about the fact that CNN
00:35:09.140 didn't cover the biggest story in the news.
00:35:11.740 And it's obvious they didn't.
00:35:15.020 What are you going to do about it?
00:35:16.660 I don't know,
00:35:17.000 just talk about the next thing?
00:35:19.420 Act like it didn't happen?
00:35:23.520 No,
00:35:23.940 I'm not just catching on to this trick.
00:35:26.440 Dumb shit.
00:35:31.640 Anyway,
00:35:32.000 if you saw Jordan Peterson tweeting
00:35:34.640 that he got a message,
00:35:36.540 he had zero new Twitter followers in June,
00:35:40.420 and you probably said to yourself,
00:35:42.260 that's not even possible
00:35:44.440 because he's got millions of followers
00:35:46.480 to have no new ones in June.
00:35:49.400 So obviously he was questioning
00:35:50.980 the algorithm there.
00:35:53.620 But somebody else said
00:35:54.760 that was just a bug.
00:35:56.240 And then I saw a screenshot
00:35:57.360 where there are people
00:35:58.900 who had actually grown a lot of users,
00:36:01.700 but they also got that message
00:36:03.360 that they got no users.
00:36:04.900 So I think it's the message itself
00:36:06.400 that's the bug.
00:36:07.760 It doesn't seem that he got no users.
00:36:10.360 He probably got users.
00:36:11.600 He just got a message
00:36:12.680 that said the opposite.
00:36:14.220 So I'm not going to worry about that one.
00:36:15.920 It looks like just a bug.
00:36:19.180 A couple days ago,
00:36:20.640 there was a story
00:36:22.160 that I didn't report,
00:36:24.340 but I saw it again,
00:36:25.220 and I thought,
00:36:25.640 you know, damn it.
00:36:27.480 I guess I'm going to have to.
00:36:30.100 I'm trying to do this
00:36:31.140 without getting sued.
00:36:32.020 So there's a report
00:36:34.960 in the National Pulse
00:36:36.120 and written by Rahim Kassam,
00:36:39.900 who's a credible person.
00:36:41.700 If you don't know who Rahim is,
00:36:43.500 he's a credible person
00:36:45.780 in this domain.
00:36:47.500 But he says there's a 2021
00:36:50.420 Haldeman report
00:36:51.680 that just came out.
00:36:52.620 So even though it was 2021,
00:36:54.360 the report just was issued
00:36:55.520 that identified allegedly
00:36:58.960 many, many technical holes
00:37:03.220 in the Dominion voting machines
00:37:04.980 that are commonly used
00:37:06.720 in our elections.
00:37:08.560 It's a 96-page report,
00:37:12.200 and it says,
00:37:13.840 among other things,
00:37:15.740 that you can put malware in it
00:37:18.980 in moments,
00:37:19.680 so you only need
00:37:20.720 momentary access
00:37:21.840 to the machine
00:37:22.740 to, you know,
00:37:24.020 stick in a drive
00:37:24.920 or something
00:37:25.360 and reprogram it.
00:37:27.080 So the first thing is
00:37:28.120 just a casual contact
00:37:30.460 with the machines
00:37:31.360 would be enough
00:37:31.940 to reprogram them.
00:37:33.980 Casual contact.
00:37:35.460 You just need access.
00:37:36.980 That's it.
00:37:38.520 And then allegedly,
00:37:40.620 now these are not my claims.
00:37:42.000 These are just the claims here.
00:37:44.440 And that allegedly
00:37:45.480 it would be easy
00:37:46.460 to change them
00:37:47.300 in a way
00:37:48.360 that would change the votes
00:37:49.600 and would be undetectable
00:37:51.980 in an audit.
00:37:54.300 That's the claim.
00:37:56.120 So there's a 96-page
00:37:57.840 detailed report
00:37:59.180 that says the machines
00:38:01.260 are full of security problems
00:38:03.820 and that brief access to them
00:38:06.860 would allow a hacker
00:38:09.200 to change the vote
00:38:10.620 and never be detected.
00:38:14.460 Is that too on the nose?
00:38:18.360 It feels a little too
00:38:19.260 on the nose for me.
00:38:21.600 Now, part of me says
00:38:23.440 anything can be hacked.
00:38:26.100 Right?
00:38:27.000 But would they really
00:38:27.980 make it so easy
00:38:28.800 to hack that casual contact
00:38:30.560 with it would be
00:38:31.340 all you needed?
00:38:32.880 I mean, just a few minutes
00:38:34.200 with it is all you need
00:38:35.000 to get in there?
00:38:36.740 That doesn't feel right.
00:38:38.700 I don't know.
00:38:39.900 And I'm guessing
00:38:40.700 the reason it's not
00:38:41.660 national news
00:38:42.540 is that it's not credible.
00:38:43.720 Or nobody wants
00:38:46.620 to cover it
00:38:47.260 because Dominion
00:38:47.920 likes to sue people.
00:38:50.420 So it could be
00:38:51.120 that nobody just
00:38:52.820 wants to touch the story.
00:38:54.040 It's just too toxic.
00:38:55.740 It might be that.
00:38:57.140 But it also feels
00:38:58.000 a little too on the nose.
00:39:00.440 Yeah, which is
00:39:01.300 our signal for bullshit.
00:39:04.000 It's like, really?
00:39:04.820 96 pages of problems
00:39:06.540 and nobody else
00:39:07.800 was aware of it?
00:39:09.360 Really?
00:39:10.400 96 pages full of problems.
00:39:12.160 But Dominion
00:39:13.720 wasn't aware of it, right?
00:39:15.720 But they could easily
00:39:16.600 just go in there
00:39:17.260 and look from the outside
00:39:18.420 and find 96 pages
00:39:20.300 worth of problems.
00:39:22.780 Maybe.
00:39:24.100 I'm not going to say
00:39:25.400 it's impossible.
00:39:26.960 I'm just going to say
00:39:28.080 that what you judge
00:39:29.920 as credible
00:39:30.720 these days,
00:39:32.960 you really, really
00:39:34.240 have to be careful.
00:39:35.880 I have no idea.
00:39:36.960 I don't even have
00:39:37.560 the best guess
00:39:38.480 about whether
00:39:39.540 this is credible.
00:39:40.800 Not even a guess.
00:39:42.160 No idea.
00:39:43.720 I'm pretty sure
00:39:44.580 that you haven't seen
00:39:45.340 the other side of it.
00:39:47.140 Well, that I know.
00:39:48.600 So if I gave you
00:39:50.240 a report that says
00:39:51.180 these machines
00:39:52.380 are full of flaws
00:39:53.340 but have not given you
00:39:55.380 Dominion's response
00:39:56.600 to the specific claims,
00:39:58.600 do you know anything?
00:40:00.000 In 2023,
00:40:01.220 if you see
00:40:01.640 one person's claims
00:40:02.800 without the defense,
00:40:04.560 do you know anything?
00:40:06.140 No.
00:40:07.080 No, that would be
00:40:07.700 exactly like knowing nothing.
00:40:09.480 Because there's always
00:40:11.020 a counter-argument.
00:40:13.180 Always.
00:40:14.220 And you might be
00:40:14.920 quite convinced by it.
00:40:18.200 You know,
00:40:19.880 it could be as easy
00:40:21.260 as the machines
00:40:22.180 they tested
00:40:22.840 were not
00:40:23.880 production machines.
00:40:26.460 You know,
00:40:26.720 like the defense
00:40:27.560 could be that easy.
00:40:29.840 They didn't test
00:40:30.960 the real machines.
00:40:32.380 The real ones
00:40:33.020 have better security.
00:40:34.460 And then you're done.
00:40:35.040 I mean,
00:40:36.000 that could be
00:40:36.300 the whole story.
00:40:38.200 I don't think it is.
00:40:39.660 I mean,
00:40:39.880 I'm just giving you
00:40:40.960 an example.
00:40:41.800 I'm just saying that
00:40:42.660 if you can't imagine
00:40:44.140 that there would be
00:40:45.660 a totally good defense
00:40:46.940 for all of it,
00:40:48.280 then your imagination
00:40:49.140 is broken.
00:40:51.300 That would be a problem
00:40:52.100 with your imagination.
00:40:53.700 Because I can definitely
00:40:54.640 imagine
00:40:55.180 that none of it's true.
00:40:57.800 But I could also
00:40:58.620 imagine it is.
00:40:59.580 I just don't know.
00:41:00.760 No information
00:41:01.440 one way or the other
00:41:02.240 on that one.
00:41:02.700 So I've been
00:41:06.200 watching
00:41:07.260 with some amusement.
00:41:09.780 There are a number
00:41:10.460 of videos
00:41:11.540 on social media
00:41:12.380 that are all
00:41:12.900 sort of in the same vein.
00:41:15.140 And what it is
00:41:15.720 is there will be
00:41:16.200 some guy,
00:41:17.220 usually on a podcast,
00:41:18.960 who will ask
00:41:19.580 a woman
00:41:20.280 or a group of women
00:41:21.500 to describe
00:41:22.920 the minimal
00:41:24.560 acceptable man
00:41:25.960 for a boyfriend
00:41:27.420 or a husband.
00:41:28.580 And when they
00:41:29.180 describe the
00:41:30.480 sort of minimal
00:41:31.500 acceptable man,
00:41:33.940 they have
00:41:34.840 some requirements.
00:41:36.000 They usually say
00:41:36.620 he should be
00:41:36.940 at least six feet tall.
00:41:38.380 They'd like him
00:41:39.140 to make at least
00:41:39.800 six-figure income.
00:41:41.780 They want somebody
00:41:42.720 who's fun,
00:41:43.480 got a sense of humor,
00:41:45.160 somebody who's not obese,
00:41:47.000 and somebody
00:41:48.540 who likes to travel.
00:41:50.540 It's a pretty good package,
00:41:51.780 right?
00:41:52.920 Imagine that.
00:41:53.620 Six feet tall,
00:41:55.100 six-figure income,
00:41:56.300 fun to be around,
00:41:58.080 good body weight,
00:41:59.420 and likes to travel.
00:42:02.220 So that's exactly
00:42:02.940 what the women
00:42:03.460 are looking for.
00:42:04.440 I just described
00:42:05.540 Hunter Biden.
00:42:07.660 That's Hunter Biden.
00:42:09.380 He's six feet tall,
00:42:10.340 has a seven-figure income.
00:42:11.960 He's very fun.
00:42:13.220 He's not obese,
00:42:14.020 and he likes to travel.
00:42:16.560 So there's your
00:42:17.480 perfect guy.
00:42:19.460 Another one would be,
00:42:20.740 let's see,
00:42:21.400 six feet tall,
00:42:22.860 six-figure income.
00:42:24.680 Andrew Tate.
00:42:26.040 Andrew Tate.
00:42:27.580 He'd be another one.
00:42:28.280 So ladies,
00:42:29.780 you do have options.
00:42:30.920 I mean,
00:42:31.160 it can seem discouraging
00:42:32.880 because you're looking around,
00:42:34.540 you're like,
00:42:34.820 why?
00:42:35.720 Why is there nobody
00:42:36.500 who meets my requirements?
00:42:37.620 But there are.
00:42:38.760 There are.
00:42:40.220 Hunter's available,
00:42:41.280 and I believe that
00:42:42.460 both of the Tate brothers
00:42:43.640 are single.
00:42:45.020 Both available.
00:42:46.980 You said nothing
00:42:48.020 about living in Romania,
00:42:49.700 so that's on you.
00:42:53.340 All right.
00:42:55.380 That, ladies and gentlemen,
00:42:56.700 is about all I had.
00:43:00.360 I think even
00:43:01.680 this shorter version today,
00:43:04.160 we could conclude
00:43:05.340 it's the best thing
00:43:06.140 you've ever seen.
00:43:07.700 And probably all
00:43:09.160 of my points
00:43:09.800 will be turned
00:43:11.480 into talking points
00:43:12.900 by all the important
00:43:14.820 people in the world.
00:43:16.560 I think that's going
00:43:17.600 to happen.
00:43:18.800 Or we could just talk
00:43:19.980 about that stupid
00:43:20.700 submarine
00:43:21.220 all summer long.
00:43:23.260 By the way,
00:43:25.100 is anybody talking
00:43:25.700 about Trump anymore?
00:43:27.080 Does Trump have
00:43:27.700 any legal problems?
00:43:31.440 Who's getting
00:43:32.200 all the attention
00:43:32.960 in the election?
00:43:36.560 What candidate
00:43:37.480 is sucking up
00:43:38.560 all the attention?
00:43:41.040 Trump?
00:43:42.080 Not anymore.
00:43:43.540 It's RFK.
00:43:44.300 Yeah.
00:43:45.340 So there's a funny thing
00:43:46.700 happening with RFK Jr.
00:43:48.860 that I'm very curious about.
00:43:51.000 And it goes like this.
00:43:53.420 There's one version
00:43:54.600 of him
00:43:55.000 where he has always
00:43:56.880 said crazy stuff
00:43:58.060 and he's saying
00:43:59.320 more crazy stuff.
00:44:01.020 And that everything
00:44:01.620 he says has been
00:44:02.620 debunked and disproved
00:44:05.000 and everybody
00:44:06.000 who agreed with him
00:44:06.860 has changed their mind.
00:44:08.800 So that version
00:44:10.080 is out there.
00:44:10.980 Now, you might
00:44:11.560 not be surprised
00:44:12.720 that it's Democrat
00:44:14.240 leading people
00:44:14.960 who have the version
00:44:15.740 that he's crazy.
00:44:16.660 Because they don't
00:44:17.340 want him to beat Biden.
00:44:18.280 However,
00:44:20.760 there's a version
00:44:21.540 that I've seen
00:44:22.540 just watching
00:44:23.620 a number of his interviews
00:44:24.700 which doesn't look
00:44:25.780 anything like that.
00:44:27.720 The one I've seen
00:44:28.500 he's asking for
00:44:29.420 insanely
00:44:30.200 reasonable things.
00:44:33.640 Like maybe
00:44:34.220 these vaccinations
00:44:35.840 should be tested more.
00:44:37.660 Or maybe the company
00:44:38.760 should be
00:44:39.440 not free
00:44:41.200 from any lawsuits.
00:44:43.120 Those are
00:44:43.760 reasonably good points.
00:44:44.860 You could agree
00:44:45.420 or you could argue
00:44:46.200 them
00:44:46.480 but they're
00:44:46.900 solid points
00:44:48.900 of debate.
00:44:53.860 So I would say
00:44:54.960 that the
00:44:55.380 Democrat
00:44:56.340 smear machine
00:44:57.640 is in
00:44:58.100 full action.
00:45:00.820 But at the same time
00:45:01.900 I don't know
00:45:03.800 if any of it's true.
00:45:06.980 Does anybody
00:45:07.740 have an opinion
00:45:08.700 that RFK Jr.
00:45:10.260 has been
00:45:11.040 spewing
00:45:11.840 BS for years
00:45:13.240 and none of it's true?
00:45:14.100 Does anybody
00:45:15.240 have that feeling?
00:45:17.140 Because that's
00:45:17.960 what I thought
00:45:18.340 a year ago.
00:45:19.340 A year ago
00:45:19.960 I just dismissed
00:45:20.920 him as a
00:45:21.620 crazy guy.
00:45:26.840 Well I don't know.
00:45:28.360 So
00:45:28.560 I'm
00:45:30.160 completely
00:45:31.460 engaged
00:45:32.760 in trying
00:45:33.900 to figure out
00:45:34.460 what's true
00:45:34.960 and what's not true
00:45:35.780 with RFK Jr.
00:45:38.080 Because I'd love
00:45:38.960 to know
00:45:39.740 if the
00:45:40.220 criticisms
00:45:40.720 are true.
00:45:42.080 Because if the
00:45:42.640 criticisms
00:45:43.140 are valid
00:45:44.000 well that would
00:45:45.420 definitely
00:45:45.760 change my
00:45:46.360 mind.
00:45:47.400 But the
00:45:47.620 people making
00:45:48.740 the criticisms
00:45:49.440 are the
00:45:49.940 least credible
00:45:50.900 people in the
00:45:51.580 planet.
00:45:52.640 The least
00:45:53.320 credible.
00:45:53.900 If you're
00:45:54.240 going to make
00:45:54.460 a list
00:45:54.860 of all the
00:45:55.880 people you
00:45:56.260 could believe
00:45:56.920 and all the
00:45:57.740 people you
00:45:58.120 couldn't believe
00:45:58.920 the people
00:46:00.060 who are accusing
00:46:00.780 him are all
00:46:01.660 the people you
00:46:02.240 can't believe.
00:46:03.860 It's the
00:46:04.200 least credible
00:46:05.140 people are
00:46:05.800 his enemies.
00:46:08.540 So what do
00:46:09.260 you make of that?
00:46:10.240 Because it
00:46:10.860 doesn't mean
00:46:11.320 they're wrong.
00:46:11.880 there's a
00:46:15.100 Cernovich link.
00:46:16.240 Is Cernovich
00:46:16.880 linking to
00:46:17.840 something saying
00:46:18.600 he's crazy
00:46:19.500 or something
00:46:20.040 saying he's
00:46:20.740 not crazy?
00:46:24.460 Give me the
00:46:25.620 highlight of
00:46:26.320 the Cernovich
00:46:27.120 opinion.
00:46:29.640 Because Cernovich
00:46:30.240 has probably
00:46:30.640 looked into it
00:46:31.280 so I would
00:46:32.420 trust his
00:46:33.640 opinion on
00:46:34.200 this.
00:46:34.420 all right.
00:46:37.720 Well give
00:46:37.980 me the
00:46:38.380 give me the
00:46:41.360 deets on
00:46:41.820 that.
00:46:44.580 Cernovich says
00:46:45.200 he's solid
00:46:46.700 100%.
00:46:47.580 All right.
00:46:50.020 That means
00:46:50.480 something to
00:46:50.900 me.
00:46:51.500 Now when you
00:46:51.960 talk about the
00:46:52.620 least credible
00:46:53.360 people and the
00:46:54.220 most credible
00:46:54.780 people, I
00:46:56.200 would consider
00:46:56.740 Cernovich in a
00:46:58.140 high credibility
00:46:59.060 category.
00:47:01.180 With the
00:47:01.840 exception of
00:47:03.060 Pizzagate.
00:47:03.600 I think
00:47:06.420 Pizzagate just
00:47:07.180 has to be its
00:47:07.740 own special
00:47:09.220 case.
00:47:11.920 I won't make
00:47:13.040 any more
00:47:13.360 comments on
00:47:14.020 that.
00:47:14.760 I'll just say
00:47:15.420 that if you
00:47:15.860 don't count
00:47:16.300 that, he's
00:47:19.520 a high
00:47:20.680 credibility
00:47:21.140 person.
00:47:26.880 Vivek.
00:47:27.620 I see lots
00:47:28.140 of comments
00:47:28.580 about Vivek.
00:47:29.400 So I
00:47:30.640 don't think
00:47:30.980 there's going
00:47:31.340 to be a
00:47:31.940 third party
00:47:32.720 run in
00:47:33.480 either case.
00:47:34.800 I saw
00:47:35.200 Joe Manchin
00:47:35.800 teasing about
00:47:36.580 it.
00:47:40.720 But I
00:47:41.440 don't think
00:47:41.700 Joe Manchin
00:47:42.160 is going to
00:47:42.480 do it.
00:47:43.360 He'd get
00:47:43.660 too much
00:47:44.120 heat.
00:47:45.720 Now I
00:47:46.300 saw on
00:47:47.100 YouTube that
00:47:47.680 RFK Jr.'s
00:47:48.560 voice is
00:47:49.320 going to be
00:47:49.680 a huge
00:47:50.440 impediment.
00:47:52.840 Let me
00:47:53.480 ask you
00:47:53.800 this.
00:47:54.160 you know
00:47:55.860 that AI
00:47:56.500 can fix
00:47:57.320 his voice.
00:47:59.040 AI can
00:47:59.900 listen to
00:48:00.300 his voice
00:48:00.740 and immediately
00:48:01.940 I'll say
00:48:02.740 translate into
00:48:04.160 smooth voice.
00:48:06.400 Because if
00:48:07.180 you were
00:48:07.440 speaking American
00:48:08.220 and you
00:48:08.660 used AI
00:48:09.220 to translate
00:48:09.900 him into
00:48:10.360 another
00:48:10.800 language,
00:48:12.040 it would
00:48:12.340 also do
00:48:12.800 that instantly.
00:48:13.860 If you
00:48:14.020 haven't seen
00:48:14.440 that, AI
00:48:15.640 is pretty
00:48:16.340 much instant
00:48:16.920 on translation
00:48:17.980 now.
00:48:18.900 So you
00:48:19.300 could,
00:48:21.180 and I
00:48:21.940 wouldn't be
00:48:22.280 surprised if
00:48:22.780 he did
00:48:23.020 this.
00:48:23.300 Oh,
00:48:24.060 actually,
00:48:24.720 if RFK
00:48:25.540 had a
00:48:26.140 special
00:48:26.540 microphone
00:48:27.160 with AI
00:48:27.960 built in,
00:48:29.200 it could
00:48:29.680 fix his
00:48:30.320 voice for
00:48:30.820 the audience.
00:48:32.780 How hard
00:48:33.560 would it be
00:48:34.000 to build
00:48:34.540 AI into
00:48:35.140 the microphone
00:48:35.780 that just
00:48:36.920 smooths out
00:48:37.520 your voice?
00:48:39.040 Your
00:48:39.280 microphone
00:48:39.740 should get
00:48:40.220 rid of
00:48:40.560 your,
00:48:40.980 you know
00:48:41.160 how I
00:48:41.420 always clear
00:48:42.000 my throat
00:48:42.580 and like
00:48:43.840 I'm terrible
00:48:45.000 at this
00:48:45.440 job because
00:48:46.120 I'm always
00:48:46.600 making like
00:48:47.300 auditory
00:48:47.880 noises that
00:48:48.560 shouldn't be
00:48:48.900 there,
00:48:49.860 coughing and
00:48:50.440 stuff.
00:48:51.100 Your
00:48:51.380 microphone
00:48:51.860 could get
00:48:52.280 rid of that
00:48:52.700 automatically.
00:48:53.300 Like you
00:48:54.740 could actually
00:48:55.180 be on
00:48:55.520 the microphone
00:48:55.920 and go
00:48:56.320 and the
00:48:57.680 microphone
00:48:58.040 would just
00:48:58.580 swallow it
00:48:59.900 and just
00:49:00.700 wouldn't
00:49:01.020 produce it
00:49:01.640 because it's
00:49:02.420 not a
00:49:02.740 word.
00:49:04.160 Good.
00:49:05.220 And you
00:49:06.080 could teach
00:49:06.560 it what
00:49:06.880 noise is
00:49:07.440 like it
00:49:08.540 could even
00:49:09.140 get rid of
00:49:09.560 your ums
00:49:10.220 if you're
00:49:11.280 one of these
00:49:11.620 people who
00:49:12.020 is like um
00:49:12.900 and then I
00:49:13.940 think we'll
00:49:14.200 do that um
00:49:15.120 I think we'll
00:49:16.140 do that and
00:49:16.600 um it could
00:49:18.180 just get rid
00:49:18.640 of the ums.
00:49:19.220 yeah so I
00:49:23.940 would not be
00:49:24.540 surprised if
00:49:25.600 in two
00:49:27.340 months or
00:49:27.840 so somebody
00:49:29.720 has introduced
00:49:30.700 a uh a
00:49:32.120 microphone for
00:49:33.760 a podcast that
00:49:34.820 RFK Jr.
00:49:35.720 could buy
00:49:36.180 you could just
00:49:37.320 take it with
00:49:37.820 them to any
00:49:38.340 any interview
00:49:39.040 and you know
00:49:40.080 just plug it
00:49:40.620 into the
00:49:41.000 podcaster's
00:49:41.720 system and
00:49:42.880 then he
00:49:43.560 speaks smoothly
00:49:44.180 for anybody
00:49:44.660 who wants
00:49:45.000 it so it's
00:49:48.940 possible on
00:49:51.860 the other
00:49:52.120 hand it
00:49:52.880 would seem
00:49:53.300 less authentic
00:49:54.060 so my
00:49:56.200 guess is he
00:49:56.780 wouldn't do
00:49:57.260 it because it
00:49:57.840 might sound a
00:49:58.460 little robotic
00:49:59.120 it might take
00:50:00.480 away some of
00:50:01.080 his appeal but
00:50:02.560 at least you'd
00:50:03.240 have an option
00:50:03.740 now the other
00:50:04.580 thing is that
00:50:05.220 you he could
00:50:06.300 do his regular
00:50:07.140 voice but
00:50:08.640 YouTube could
00:50:09.420 give you an
00:50:09.900 option to
00:50:10.720 smooth it
00:50:11.680 because you
00:50:14.600 know what I
00:50:14.900 like I would
00:50:15.500 like that
00:50:15.880 option on
00:50:16.580 movies can
00:50:22.540 I can I
00:50:25.680 give you my
00:50:26.180 impression of
00:50:26.900 every modern
00:50:27.560 movie I think
00:50:29.820 you need to see
00:50:30.360 this before I
00:50:31.000 go Alexa turn
00:50:34.240 off studio all
00:50:37.840 right we're
00:50:38.160 going to give
00:50:38.440 you a scene
00:50:39.560 from every
00:50:40.460 modern movie
00:50:41.420 you ready
00:50:52.660 every modern
00:50:54.800 movie
00:50:55.420 scene I give
00:51:17.920 you every
00:51:18.800 modern movie
00:51:19.600 too dark so
00:51:22.580 you can't see
00:51:23.080 what the fuck
00:51:23.820 is going on
00:51:24.660 the entire
00:51:25.680 time even
00:51:26.220 when they're
00:51:26.600 indoors when
00:51:28.020 they're indoors
00:51:28.680 in the middle
00:51:29.220 of the day
00:51:29.640 all the lights
00:51:30.320 are off and
00:51:30.740 it's dark
00:51:31.220 why why and
00:51:34.380 why do they
00:51:34.780 have to whisper
00:51:35.380 all the time
00:51:36.300 why can't they
00:51:37.340 let me hear the
00:51:37.980 dialogue why
00:51:39.220 can't they give
00:51:39.700 me some
00:51:40.120 Hitchcock
00:51:40.700 Hitchcock
00:51:41.760 dialogue I
00:51:43.300 believe I
00:51:44.140 saw the person
00:51:44.920 going into
00:51:45.920 the store
00:51:46.440 Hitchcock
00:51:47.940 modern dialogue
00:51:49.860 there's your
00:51:55.340 modern audio
00:51:55.980 right there
00:51:56.600 am I wrong
00:51:58.060 yeah it's like
00:51:59.360 24
00:51:59.820 everything's
00:52:01.220 whispering in
00:52:01.840 the dark
00:52:02.260 the whole time
00:52:03.340 is Tara
00:52:05.500 like that
00:52:06.020 no it's not
00:52:08.640 my hearing
00:52:09.280 going because
00:52:10.240 I can I
00:52:10.800 know how to
00:52:11.240 turn up the
00:52:11.760 television it's
00:52:12.780 not my hearing
00:52:13.620 then have you
00:52:15.560 ever tried to
00:52:16.080 watch anything
00:52:16.740 with a British
00:52:17.440 accent
00:52:17.980 it's not hard
00:52:21.580 to understand
00:52:22.080 a British
00:52:22.480 accent
00:52:23.000 when I watch
00:52:24.100 the news
00:52:24.820 and I see
00:52:25.860 somebody with
00:52:26.380 a British
00:52:26.720 accent talking
00:52:27.640 on the news
00:52:28.280 I understand
00:52:29.320 every word
00:52:30.000 every word
00:52:31.400 no problem
00:52:31.960 at all
00:52:32.380 but if you
00:52:33.600 put a British
00:52:34.100 person on
00:52:34.840 any kind of
00:52:35.380 television show
00:52:36.480 a scripted
00:52:37.240 show
00:52:37.560 oh blimey
00:52:39.300 it's just like
00:52:41.300 they're talking
00:52:41.700 with a mouthful
00:52:42.360 of nickels
00:52:42.860 or something
00:52:43.280 I mean I
00:52:43.980 don't even
00:52:44.260 understand how
00:52:45.160 it's a show
00:52:45.640 yeah
00:52:46.640 you have to
00:52:47.280 put on
00:52:47.540 subtitles
00:52:48.140 do you know
00:52:49.600 people who
00:52:50.040 put on the
00:52:50.480 subtitles just
00:52:51.340 to watch a
00:52:51.940 show that's
00:52:52.360 in English
00:52:52.860 yep
00:52:54.620 and it's not
00:52:55.620 because your
00:52:56.060 hearing's bad
00:52:56.740 it's because
00:52:57.780 they make it
00:52:58.500 so you can't
00:52:59.220 hear it
00:52:59.720 it's made
00:53:00.860 that way
00:53:01.280 yeah
00:53:02.200 I'm seeing an
00:53:04.100 entire list of
00:53:04.940 people saying
00:53:05.440 they have to
00:53:06.280 put the
00:53:06.560 subtitles on
00:53:07.280 just to watch
00:53:07.760 TV
00:53:08.100 yep
00:53:09.140 yep
00:53:10.920 yep
00:53:11.240 all right
00:53:13.040 ladies and
00:53:13.480 gentlemen
00:53:13.760 what this
00:53:16.120 needs is a
00:53:16.740 little bit
00:53:17.080 more light
00:53:17.660 on me
00:53:18.080 that's all
00:53:19.100 I have for
00:53:19.460 today
00:53:19.740 I'm going to
00:53:20.100 say bye to
00:53:20.680 the YouTube
00:53:21.380 people
00:53:22.140 best live
00:53:23.620 stream you've
00:53:24.120 ever seen
00:53:24.660 in your whole
00:53:25.180 life
00:53:25.600 remember you
00:53:26.540 can subscribe
00:53:27.160 to Dilbert
00:53:28.780 Reborn on
00:53:29.660 Twitter
00:53:30.060 just go to
00:53:31.540 my account
00:53:32.680 and see the
00:53:33.340 subscribe button
00:53:34.060 and you can
00:53:35.420 get access to
00:53:36.620 Dilbert
00:53:37.620 or you can
00:53:39.660 join the
00:53:40.080 locals platform
00:53:41.100 scottitems.locals.com
00:53:42.520 and you get a
00:53:43.960 lot more than
00:53:44.460 Dilbert Reborn
00:53:45.160 you get all the
00:53:45.840 good stuff
00:53:46.880 that I can't
00:53:47.860 show you in
00:53:48.280 public
00:53:48.560 and
00:53:50.200 I'm not
00:53:52.440 positive
00:53:52.860 but it looks
00:53:54.240 like Elon
00:53:54.700 Musk
00:53:55.080 subscribed
00:53:55.920 to my
00:53:56.760 Twitter
00:53:57.180 Dilbert Reborn
00:53:58.980 I'm not
00:54:00.460 positive
00:54:00.740 because I saw
00:54:01.480 a little
00:54:01.720 subscribe button
00:54:02.660 on his
00:54:03.440 account
00:54:04.520 the kind
00:54:05.000 that shows up
00:54:05.640 for all of
00:54:06.340 my subscribers
00:54:07.020 he has his
00:54:08.420 own subscription
00:54:09.140 but there's a
00:54:09.920 different label
00:54:10.480 that shows up
00:54:11.100 if they've
00:54:11.580 subscribed to
00:54:12.180 you
00:54:12.380 and I saw
00:54:13.320 it on his
00:54:13.680 account
00:54:14.040 so I think
00:54:16.080 he subscribed
00:54:16.960 I don't know
00:54:18.080 it would be
00:54:19.140 smart for him
00:54:19.740 to subscribe
00:54:20.440 to as much
00:54:22.420 as he could
00:54:22.920 because he's
00:54:23.600 trying to
00:54:23.920 sell that
00:54:24.280 service
00:54:24.720 admitted Scott
00:54:29.460 you're jealous
00:54:30.320 of Andrew
00:54:30.980 Top G
00:54:31.600 Tate
00:54:32.080 yeah I wish
00:54:33.680 I were in
00:54:34.060 jail
00:54:34.300 man that
00:54:35.260 looks good
00:54:35.780 that looks
00:54:37.180 really good
00:54:37.840 sure wish
00:54:38.860 I were in
00:54:39.180 jail
00:54:39.340 so good
00:54:41.980 point
00:54:42.360 you
00:54:51.860 you
00:54:55.520 you
00:54:55.920 you