Real Coffee with Scott Adams - June 30, 2023


Episode 2155 Scott Adams: The Most Fun You Can Have Catching Up With The News. Bring Coffee!


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 8 minutes

Words per Minute

141.7553

Word Count

9,698

Sentence Count

716

Misogynist Sentences

17

Hate Speech Sentences

42


Summary

In this episode, Scott Adams talks about the end of affirmative action at Harvard, Geraldo's exit from Fox News, and why he thinks Aspartame is bad for cancer. Plus, a new ruling from the Supreme Court regarding race discrimination in college admissions.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.
00:00:07.000 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, the best thing that's ever happened in your life.
00:00:12.580 And if you'd like to take it up to levels that are impossible to even describe,
00:00:17.220 all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or a chalice or a stein,
00:00:20.860 a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:24.160 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.
00:00:26.960 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.
00:00:31.020 It's the dopamine hit of the day. A little bit of oxytocin today.
00:00:35.160 And it happens now. Go.
00:00:41.320 Oh, yeah, that's good. Yeah, that's good.
00:00:45.320 Now your day is going to look excellent.
00:00:50.280 Well, Geraldo has quit-fired from Fox News,
00:00:55.860 meaning that he was fired from the Five,
00:00:59.860 but he was still employed at the network.
00:01:01.940 But that wasn't good enough, so Geraldo has quit.
00:01:05.140 He quit-fired.
00:01:07.980 I don't think it's related to affirmative action.
00:01:12.240 Probably just a coincidence.
00:01:15.260 We'll get to affirmative action.
00:01:17.560 Did you see a news story yesterday that said aspartame causes cancer?
00:01:21.380 How many of you saw that?
00:01:26.420 And you thought that was true, right?
00:01:29.120 You saw that story and you said, well, that's probably true.
00:01:32.140 Well, I got community noted today.
00:01:36.400 It's true-ish.
00:01:40.020 What I didn't know until I read the community notes
00:01:42.620 is that there are many layers of how bad it is for cancer.
00:01:50.060 So at the lowest level, which is what aspartame was assigned to,
00:01:55.080 there's all kinds of normal things in that.
00:01:58.420 Like going to Disneyland, that could cause you cancer.
00:02:02.600 There are lots of things that are in the bottom rung,
00:02:05.220 like getting in your car, could cause cancer.
00:02:10.760 Wearing clothes, maybe, could cause cancer.
00:02:15.100 So it's the lowest level, I don't know.
00:02:17.160 So it seems like that was a very important context.
00:02:21.000 Because it would be in a level of things that you commonly experience
00:02:24.380 and don't worry about, basically.
00:02:28.440 All right, I guess we should talk about this Supreme Court decision,
00:02:32.420 affirmative action for universities and colleges has been ended.
00:02:38.680 Or has it?
00:02:40.720 Or has it?
00:02:42.260 I don't think there's any real change.
00:02:45.540 I think we're just talking about words.
00:02:48.840 Yeah, nothing's going to...
00:02:50.120 There's no indication anything in the real world will change.
00:02:53.020 Maybe. We'll see.
00:02:54.740 But it looks like all they did was change the wording.
00:02:57.660 Because the new wording, which is funny.
00:03:05.120 Let's see.
00:03:05.840 The new wording is...
00:03:10.120 This is how Harvard will skirt the law.
00:03:15.120 So Harvard said they can still consider, quote...
00:03:17.800 This is based on the Supreme Court decision.
00:03:21.140 Harvard can still consider, quote,
00:03:22.960 an applicant's discussion of how race affected his or her life,
00:03:27.880 be it through discrimination, inspiration, or otherwise.
00:03:32.080 And then it says,
00:03:33.380 we will certainly comply with the court's order.
00:03:36.660 We will certainly comply with the court's order.
00:03:40.140 They just tell you they're not going to change anything.
00:03:43.320 They're saying it directly, but in a Harvard way.
00:03:46.700 You know, so it sounds like...
00:03:48.020 It sounds like they're going to comply,
00:03:50.380 which they totally are.
00:03:51.960 But apparently the order gives them such a gigantic workaround
00:03:57.500 that Harvard just said,
00:03:59.700 did you just give us a huge workaround
00:04:01.520 where we can do what we're doing
00:04:02.940 the same as we've always been doing it?
00:04:06.020 Apparently the answer is yes.
00:04:07.620 There's a huge workaround.
00:04:09.440 They can't discriminate against race.
00:04:11.920 Instead, instead of discriminating by race,
00:04:14.940 they can take race into consideration
00:04:17.180 when they make their decision.
00:04:19.660 Oh, that's completely different.
00:04:21.960 Now, correct me if I'm wrong,
00:04:25.040 but when they had affirmative action,
00:04:27.620 they didn't have a goal, did they?
00:04:30.660 There was no specific thing they were trying to hit.
00:04:35.380 You know, just more of it, I guess.
00:04:37.840 So how is this different?
00:04:40.640 How in any way is this different?
00:04:42.400 Black kid writes an essay and says,
00:04:47.060 I've been, you know,
00:04:47.880 a victim of systemic racism all my life.
00:04:51.500 You're in.
00:04:53.000 That's exactly what we're looking for.
00:04:55.540 How in the world does it change anything?
00:04:57.360 Nothing changed.
00:04:58.560 Nothing changed at all.
00:04:59.700 All right.
00:05:05.180 But, so, my favorite kind of story
00:05:08.520 is when somebody's opinion,
00:05:11.760 usually a famous person,
00:05:13.380 when their opinion becomes so absurd,
00:05:16.240 but they hold on to it anyway.
00:05:18.300 When people go from having an opinion
00:05:20.280 to pretending to have an opinion,
00:05:23.100 then everything gets funny.
00:05:24.280 And what could be funnier
00:05:26.940 than watching Justice Thomas
00:05:29.300 and Justice Jackson
00:05:31.840 debating that Supreme Court ruling?
00:05:36.420 Because am I wrong in assuming
00:05:39.120 that Justice Thomas
00:05:40.320 was the Republicans' affirmative action?
00:05:43.520 Is that too harsh?
00:05:46.080 Does anybody think that
00:05:47.900 they looked at the whole world
00:05:49.440 and they, just coincidentally,
00:05:51.000 he was black?
00:05:52.540 Does anybody think that?
00:05:54.280 Or do you think he got put
00:05:55.960 at the top of the consideration list?
00:05:58.260 I'm not saying he's not qualified.
00:06:00.460 I'm just saying,
00:06:01.300 you don't think he got bumped
00:06:02.460 to the top of the list?
00:06:04.260 And I'm not, and by the way,
00:06:05.480 I'm not saying that that was wrong.
00:06:09.140 I would have no disagreement
00:06:10.700 with it whatsoever.
00:06:11.960 I do think the Supreme Court
00:06:13.480 is one place where you put a little,
00:06:16.100 you ought to put a little,
00:06:17.320 little thumb on the scales,
00:06:19.820 make sure that there's somebody there
00:06:21.700 that looks a little bit
00:06:23.440 like the rest of America, you know?
00:06:25.500 I don't think it would be
00:06:26.920 a credible court
00:06:28.540 if it was all a bunch of white men.
00:06:31.220 So, you know, there are places
00:06:32.940 where it's just necessary
00:06:34.620 to have the group look
00:06:37.500 a little bit like
00:06:38.260 the nature of the country.
00:06:40.220 It just helps your credibility.
00:06:41.600 But, we don't have to pretend
00:06:45.320 we're not doing that.
00:06:47.900 Yeah, so you have to pretend
00:06:48.960 you're not doing that
00:06:50.100 to have this weird conversation
00:06:51.840 where the two black members
00:06:54.700 of the court,
00:06:55.860 one is arguing against
00:06:57.580 affirmative action
00:06:58.440 and one is arguing for it.
00:07:01.660 The absurdity of that
00:07:03.280 is just through the roof.
00:07:05.960 Because, does Jackson believe
00:07:08.340 that she would have been picked
00:07:09.560 to the Supreme Court
00:07:10.580 if not a woman
00:07:12.120 and also black?
00:07:14.360 Does she think
00:07:15.340 there's any chance
00:07:16.040 she would be
00:07:16.380 in the Supreme Court?
00:07:18.420 But I don't think
00:07:19.360 that the Supreme Court
00:07:20.220 had affirmative action, did it?
00:07:23.180 I don't think so.
00:07:24.800 The president was not bound
00:07:26.320 by affirmative action
00:07:27.520 to pick a member
00:07:29.840 of the court
00:07:30.340 that increased its diversity,
00:07:32.220 but wanted to do it anyway
00:07:34.040 for political reasons,
00:07:35.360 which are pretty solid,
00:07:36.600 pretty solid political reasons.
00:07:40.020 So, the absurdity
00:07:41.760 is just fun to watch.
00:07:43.240 However, just a clarification,
00:07:45.800 the dropping of affirmative action
00:07:47.760 in universities
00:07:49.180 won't have any effect
00:07:50.840 on television, advertising,
00:07:54.280 or the movies.
00:07:55.560 Those will still be
00:07:56.620 entirely based on race,
00:07:58.720 like now.
00:08:01.320 All right.
00:08:01.700 let's see,
00:08:05.020 what else?
00:08:05.620 Berkeley.
00:08:07.780 So, there's a video
00:08:08.860 of a Berkeley
00:08:09.560 law school dean
00:08:11.460 explaining somebody
00:08:13.840 had their phone out.
00:08:15.800 And even as he's explaining
00:08:17.340 this in front of the group,
00:08:19.740 he says,
00:08:20.480 if I'm ever deposed,
00:08:21.580 I'm going to deny this to you.
00:08:23.060 I said this to you.
00:08:24.440 So, he actually says,
00:08:26.200 you know,
00:08:27.300 I'm going to deny
00:08:28.220 I ever said this
00:08:29.160 in front of a group.
00:08:30.840 every one of them
00:08:31.620 who had a phone
00:08:32.260 with a camera.
00:08:35.780 He's a law professor.
00:08:38.000 The dean.
00:08:39.860 I don't know.
00:08:40.660 You know,
00:08:41.480 Berkeley is my alma mater
00:08:42.800 for my business degree,
00:08:45.840 but
00:08:45.980 I've got a feeling
00:08:48.740 this isn't their best work.
00:08:53.180 But anyway,
00:08:53.780 he describes
00:08:54.640 how they can
00:08:55.300 simply
00:08:56.080 discriminate
00:08:57.120 the way they always have.
00:08:58.360 They just won't call it
00:08:59.860 affirmative action.
00:09:02.700 They'll just do it anyway.
00:09:05.240 Now,
00:09:06.400 what do you think?
00:09:09.220 Do you think
00:09:09.960 anything changed?
00:09:11.860 Who thinks
00:09:12.700 something changed
00:09:13.560 yesterday?
00:09:15.380 I don't.
00:09:16.680 Right.
00:09:17.460 I saw
00:09:18.160 Gavin Newsom
00:09:19.040 tweeted
00:09:20.460 against
00:09:21.000 the
00:09:21.940 decision.
00:09:24.200 And then
00:09:24.580 this is the most
00:09:25.280 fun part.
00:09:25.960 Michael
00:09:27.680 Schirmer,
00:09:29.240 who is
00:09:29.780 very,
00:09:30.400 very well-known,
00:09:32.660 let's say,
00:09:33.820 I don't know
00:09:34.220 what I want to say.
00:09:35.300 He's a well-known
00:09:36.220 writer,
00:09:37.160 public figure,
00:09:38.740 and
00:09:39.300 very much
00:09:40.600 associated
00:09:41.220 with the left,
00:09:42.960 I think.
00:09:43.600 Although he's more
00:09:44.280 of a free thinker.
00:09:45.220 That's unfair.
00:09:46.500 I think it's unfair
00:09:47.260 to characterize him
00:09:48.060 that way.
00:09:48.360 But
00:09:49.020 he said
00:09:52.180 he mocked
00:09:53.280 Gavin Newsom
00:09:54.140 for thinking
00:09:55.260 anything would
00:09:55.960 change.
00:09:57.340 And he said,
00:09:58.060 who do you think
00:09:58.700 is running a
00:10:00.200 university
00:10:00.680 that's going to
00:10:02.340 start acting
00:10:03.720 differently?
00:10:05.060 Name names.
00:10:07.000 Name one person
00:10:08.360 in any university
00:10:09.340 in California
00:10:10.140 who will act
00:10:11.220 differently
00:10:11.700 because of this.
00:10:14.780 And it was
00:10:15.200 a really good,
00:10:15.940 Now,
00:10:16.480 the one thing
00:10:16.920 Michael Schirmer
00:10:17.520 is famous for
00:10:18.440 is being a
00:10:19.760 rational skeptic.
00:10:22.320 Right?
00:10:22.620 So he does
00:10:23.440 stick to the facts.
00:10:25.080 He's a very
00:10:25.520 fact-based
00:10:26.420 opinion person.
00:10:28.340 And he just
00:10:29.460 says,
00:10:30.560 he just looked
00:10:31.180 at it and said,
00:10:32.040 tell me what
00:10:32.700 fact
00:10:33.240 changes anything.
00:10:35.260 Give me a fact.
00:10:36.420 Give me the name
00:10:37.100 of the person
00:10:37.660 who's now going
00:10:38.620 to change
00:10:38.980 their policies
00:10:39.660 or at least
00:10:40.380 the way they act.
00:10:41.580 Nobody.
00:10:42.800 Nobody can come
00:10:43.600 up even with
00:10:44.200 an example
00:10:44.820 of one thing
00:10:46.160 that will be
00:10:46.540 different.
00:10:47.520 Nothing.
00:10:48.660 Not a person
00:10:49.400 who will act
00:10:50.160 differently.
00:10:51.240 Not an outcome
00:10:53.140 that will be
00:10:53.640 different.
00:10:54.360 Nothing.
00:10:57.420 But everybody's
00:10:58.440 all worked up
00:10:59.120 about it.
00:10:59.740 My favorite
00:11:00.320 story about
00:11:00.940 this was a
00:11:01.880 tweet yesterday
00:11:03.220 from somebody
00:11:04.380 named Erica
00:11:06.040 Marsh
00:11:06.580 that some
00:11:09.180 people thought
00:11:09.720 was a parody
00:11:10.360 and other
00:11:11.860 people thought
00:11:12.420 it was real.
00:11:12.940 Now I'm
00:11:14.220 going to read
00:11:14.600 it to you
00:11:15.080 and I want
00:11:16.140 you to use
00:11:16.620 all of your
00:11:17.380 powers to
00:11:19.860 discern if
00:11:20.520 it's a parody
00:11:21.140 or it's real.
00:11:22.860 Now if it's
00:11:23.500 real,
00:11:24.560 you have the
00:11:25.140 second possibility
00:11:26.120 that it doesn't
00:11:27.460 mean what it
00:11:28.040 looks like it
00:11:28.560 means because
00:11:30.160 there's already
00:11:30.720 been a
00:11:31.040 clarification.
00:11:32.740 Now I'll
00:11:33.160 tell you the
00:11:33.540 clarification
00:11:34.020 after I tell
00:11:36.560 you the tweet.
00:11:37.760 So just know
00:11:38.680 that the tweet
00:11:39.300 is going to
00:11:39.820 sound really,
00:11:40.820 really bad.
00:11:42.560 Really bad.
00:11:44.600 But let's
00:11:45.000 see if you
00:11:45.300 think it's
00:11:45.660 real or
00:11:46.480 maybe something
00:11:47.180 else was
00:11:47.660 intended by it.
00:11:49.080 So here's
00:11:49.420 the tweet
00:11:49.740 from somebody
00:11:50.760 named Erica
00:11:51.640 Marsh.
00:11:52.380 It says,
00:11:53.400 today's
00:11:54.980 Supreme Court
00:11:55.540 decision is a
00:11:56.400 direct attack
00:11:57.160 on black
00:11:57.700 people.
00:11:58.700 No black
00:11:59.280 person will
00:12:00.320 be able to
00:12:01.020 succeed in a
00:12:01.860 merit-based
00:12:02.420 system.
00:12:06.020 Wait,
00:12:06.680 what?
00:12:08.660 What?
00:12:09.260 Wait,
00:12:11.160 what?
00:12:12.760 And this
00:12:13.500 is from
00:12:13.840 somebody who
00:12:14.540 is identified
00:12:15.660 online as
00:12:17.140 an ex-Biden
00:12:18.020 staffer.
00:12:18.960 I don't know
00:12:19.480 if that's
00:12:19.820 true, but
00:12:21.340 somebody,
00:12:22.220 I'll just
00:12:22.760 say somebody
00:12:23.260 credible
00:12:23.880 identified the
00:12:25.840 account as
00:12:26.440 an ex-Biden
00:12:28.320 staffer.
00:12:29.200 Now there's
00:12:29.780 more to the
00:12:30.180 sentence, but
00:12:32.300 the first part
00:12:32.960 that got
00:12:33.260 everybody excited
00:12:34.360 was this
00:12:35.240 part.
00:12:36.320 She said,
00:12:37.000 no black
00:12:37.480 person will
00:12:38.200 be able to
00:12:39.180 succeed in
00:12:39.880 a merit-based
00:12:40.460 system.
00:12:41.460 Then she
00:12:41.980 goes on,
00:12:43.040 the next part
00:12:44.000 is important,
00:12:45.000 which is
00:12:45.440 exactly why
00:12:46.280 affirmative
00:12:47.120 action-based
00:12:47.740 programs were
00:12:48.400 needed.
00:12:50.020 Today's
00:12:50.660 decision is a
00:12:51.440 travesty,
00:12:52.120 in all caps.
00:12:53.980 All right.
00:12:56.920 Do you
00:12:57.720 believe that
00:12:59.020 a Democrat
00:13:00.340 who tweets
00:13:01.000 a lot
00:13:01.420 said in
00:13:03.760 public that
00:13:05.920 if black
00:13:06.760 people had
00:13:07.280 to compete
00:13:07.780 on an
00:13:08.160 equal basis,
00:13:09.260 they could
00:13:09.980 not do
00:13:10.500 it?
00:13:11.980 Do you
00:13:12.460 think that
00:13:12.740 happened?
00:13:13.260 In the
00:13:13.600 real world,
00:13:14.140 do you
00:13:14.280 think that
00:13:14.560 happened?
00:13:15.400 Because the
00:13:16.040 Internet is
00:13:16.560 acting like
00:13:17.000 it did.
00:13:18.280 Like that's
00:13:18.940 actually what
00:13:19.580 happened.
00:13:20.180 It's a real
00:13:20.700 person with
00:13:21.880 a real
00:13:22.220 opinion.
00:13:24.400 All right,
00:13:24.760 tell me here,
00:13:25.520 how many think
00:13:26.060 that that was a
00:13:26.640 real person
00:13:27.200 giving a real
00:13:27.900 opinion, and
00:13:29.000 the way it
00:13:29.420 was read is
00:13:30.000 exactly what
00:13:30.680 was meant?
00:13:31.700 Exactly what
00:13:32.360 was meant.
00:13:33.600 A lot of
00:13:33.980 yeses,
00:13:34.460 not no's.
00:13:36.140 Those who
00:13:36.620 say no,
00:13:38.180 what would
00:13:38.600 be the tell
00:13:40.440 for it being
00:13:41.420 fake?
00:13:42.660 What are you
00:13:43.260 looking at to
00:13:44.200 decide that
00:13:44.800 this is not
00:13:45.360 real?
00:13:46.340 What's the
00:13:47.040 giveaway?
00:13:50.640 Boom.
00:13:51.920 Two on the
00:13:52.380 no's.
00:13:53.620 If this were
00:13:54.720 real, it
00:13:56.120 would be
00:13:56.480 exactly,
00:13:58.300 exactly the
00:14:00.780 worst thing
00:14:01.960 that Republicans
00:14:03.300 think about
00:14:03.980 Democrats.
00:14:04.460 Democrats.
00:14:05.320 Because
00:14:05.760 privately,
00:14:07.240 well, even
00:14:07.640 publicly,
00:14:08.380 Republicans will
00:14:09.220 say all the
00:14:09.760 time, the
00:14:11.120 Democrats are
00:14:11.800 the real
00:14:12.200 racists, and
00:14:13.820 the reason they
00:14:14.340 want affirmative
00:14:14.920 action is
00:14:15.600 because they
00:14:16.240 believe that
00:14:17.620 black people
00:14:18.160 can't compete
00:14:18.920 on an even
00:14:19.700 playing field.
00:14:21.820 So the
00:14:22.420 Republican
00:14:22.800 belief is that
00:14:23.900 the Democrats
00:14:24.840 are the real
00:14:25.460 racists because
00:14:26.580 they won't
00:14:26.980 admit that
00:14:28.540 they think
00:14:28.960 they need an
00:14:29.460 extra help
00:14:30.100 because they
00:14:31.620 think there's
00:14:31.980 some wrong,
00:14:33.240 some problem
00:14:33.840 there.
00:14:34.840 Whereas
00:14:35.320 Republicans are
00:14:36.220 saying, why
00:14:36.760 can't you just
00:14:37.220 let people be
00:14:38.060 individuals?
00:14:39.620 There are
00:14:39.920 plenty of
00:14:40.460 individuals who
00:14:41.660 will do
00:14:41.900 fine, just
00:14:43.060 like in every
00:14:43.580 group.
00:14:44.980 Individuals find
00:14:45.720 a way.
00:14:46.840 Maybe the
00:14:47.380 group as a
00:14:47.960 whole doesn't
00:14:48.480 do so well,
00:14:49.380 some group as
00:14:50.020 a whole does
00:14:50.520 better.
00:14:51.560 Do I hate
00:14:52.200 Asian Americans
00:14:52.880 because they're
00:14:53.360 really good at
00:14:53.940 school?
00:14:55.880 No.
00:14:56.360 I'm just
00:14:58.080 really, really,
00:14:59.400 really happy
00:15:00.160 that I live
00:15:01.060 in a country
00:15:01.620 where there
00:15:02.460 are so many
00:15:02.940 people who
00:15:03.440 are good at
00:15:04.000 school.
00:15:05.240 I feel like
00:15:05.840 that's going
00:15:06.200 to come in
00:15:06.560 handy, build
00:15:08.000 us some
00:15:08.420 technology, solve
00:15:10.560 some problems
00:15:11.160 maybe, start
00:15:12.700 some internet
00:15:13.300 startups.
00:15:15.120 How could I
00:15:15.860 be mad at
00:15:16.360 that?
00:15:16.600 But, all
00:15:20.100 right, so
00:15:20.360 later, after
00:15:22.140 the internet
00:15:22.580 went crazy, I
00:15:24.060 saw people
00:15:24.440 like Matt
00:15:24.920 Walsh,
00:15:26.020 apparently
00:15:27.060 buying into
00:15:27.680 this being a
00:15:28.200 real opinion,
00:15:29.460 which surprised
00:15:30.360 me.
00:15:31.380 But here was
00:15:32.580 the so-called
00:15:33.420 clarification.
00:15:35.260 Now, the
00:15:35.680 clarification is
00:15:36.640 not so clear,
00:15:38.400 which is more
00:15:40.100 evidence that
00:15:40.900 this is not a
00:15:41.580 good tweeter,
00:15:43.280 and that maybe
00:15:43.940 that's all that's
00:15:44.540 going on.
00:15:45.300 It's just
00:15:45.680 somebody who's
00:15:46.060 not a good
00:15:46.460 writer.
00:15:47.320 So here's
00:15:47.680 the clarification.
00:15:49.860 Allow me to
00:15:50.540 clarify this
00:15:51.280 tweet, which
00:15:52.300 is being
00:15:52.680 manipulated for
00:15:53.580 propaganda and
00:15:54.900 misinformation by
00:15:55.860 all caps,
00:15:57.200 ULTRA MAGA.
00:15:59.060 The intention
00:16:00.060 of my tweet is
00:16:02.020 to highlight that
00:16:02.840 prior to
00:16:03.440 affirmative action,
00:16:04.840 there existed a
00:16:05.680 supposedly merit-based
00:16:07.120 system for black
00:16:08.200 individuals to
00:16:09.420 gain admission to
00:16:10.340 colleges.
00:16:11.560 However, these
00:16:12.420 institutions employed
00:16:13.580 racial profiling to
00:16:15.240 prevent black
00:16:16.280 individuals from
00:16:17.760 individuals, why
00:16:19.260 would you say
00:16:19.660 individuals twice in
00:16:20.880 one tweet?
00:16:21.360 Anyway, to
00:16:22.040 prevent black
00:16:22.700 individuals from
00:16:23.540 attending under the
00:16:24.340 guise of this
00:16:25.500 merit system.
00:16:26.920 I want to
00:16:27.420 emphasize that my
00:16:28.140 statement in no
00:16:28.780 way suggests that
00:16:29.440 black individuals,
00:16:30.400 that's three
00:16:30.880 individuals in one
00:16:31.780 tweet, are less
00:16:32.900 intelligent than
00:16:33.600 people of other
00:16:34.220 races.
00:16:35.000 Well, I think she
00:16:36.300 made her point.
00:16:37.040 I think she made
00:16:39.800 her point pretty
00:16:40.360 well because she
00:16:41.860 identifies as white
00:16:43.200 and she just said
00:16:44.120 something that's so
00:16:45.200 dumb I can't imagine
00:16:46.280 any black person
00:16:47.060 ever saying it.
00:16:49.020 So, her point that
00:16:51.320 black people are
00:16:52.180 smarter than her, I
00:16:53.420 think she made that
00:16:54.100 pretty well.
00:16:56.260 However, let's look at
00:16:58.860 her clarification.
00:17:00.520 So what she meant to
00:17:01.620 say is that before
00:17:03.700 affirmative action, it
00:17:05.000 was allegedly, and
00:17:06.840 here's the part that
00:17:07.920 got missing, we
00:17:09.120 allegedly had a
00:17:10.120 merit-based system
00:17:10.920 before and it just
00:17:12.660 didn't work.
00:17:13.920 So she's saying if
00:17:15.000 you go back to the
00:17:15.840 system that didn't
00:17:16.640 work, what are you
00:17:17.960 going to expect?
00:17:19.380 It's just not going
00:17:20.420 to work again.
00:17:21.940 Now, she's wrong, of
00:17:23.300 course, because all of
00:17:24.880 the institutions have
00:17:26.060 institutionalized a
00:17:28.740 point of view which
00:17:29.600 will perpetuate more
00:17:30.940 affirmative action.
00:17:32.200 So she's completely
00:17:33.280 stupid and
00:17:34.420 bad writer and
00:17:35.880 not a bright
00:17:37.020 individual.
00:17:38.340 But there isn't the
00:17:39.520 slightest chance that
00:17:41.420 she meant to tweet
00:17:42.540 that black people can't
00:17:44.420 compete because there's
00:17:45.160 something wrong with
00:17:45.700 them.
00:17:46.140 There's no way she
00:17:47.180 meant to say that.
00:17:48.820 Does anybody really,
00:17:49.940 now after you've heard
00:17:50.740 the explanation, do
00:17:52.500 you really still think
00:17:53.380 that?
00:17:54.360 Really?
00:17:55.720 Because I don't think
00:17:56.720 you do.
00:17:57.620 I think if you say you
00:17:59.080 believe it, that she
00:18:00.760 meant that, you are
00:18:02.420 LARPing.
00:18:02.920 you are pretending to
00:18:04.880 have opinions, right?
00:18:06.480 You're just pretending
00:18:07.240 that you're mad.
00:18:08.340 You're pretending that
00:18:09.280 this represents Democrats
00:18:10.680 and now you're going to
00:18:12.220 channel the feelings
00:18:13.100 you've always had.
00:18:14.480 You know, nothing
00:18:14.940 changed.
00:18:15.500 It's your existing
00:18:16.080 feelings.
00:18:16.920 You'll just channel it
00:18:17.780 through this poor
00:18:18.380 motherfucker who said
00:18:20.460 some dumb shit things
00:18:21.420 online.
00:18:21.860 I would like to defend
00:18:24.540 her because at the very
00:18:28.960 least I would like my
00:18:30.100 audience to understand
00:18:31.320 and here's the thing to
00:18:33.600 remember.
00:18:34.700 Whenever there's a public
00:18:36.000 figure, or in this case
00:18:37.300 somebody who's been
00:18:38.240 turned into a public
00:18:39.240 figure, whenever there's
00:18:40.720 an individual in the news
00:18:41.900 that's getting heat like
00:18:43.380 this, it's never about
00:18:44.880 them.
00:18:45.140 LARPing is simply a
00:18:46.900 vehicle that people are
00:18:47.800 using to shove their
00:18:50.100 existing views further
00:18:52.060 into the news cycle.
00:18:53.800 It has nothing to do
00:18:55.040 with her.
00:18:56.000 She did not say
00:18:56.820 anything wrong.
00:18:57.880 She said something
00:18:58.500 unclear that caused the
00:18:59.920 problem.
00:19:00.540 But nothing wrong.
00:19:02.340 She was dumb.
00:19:04.720 I mean, her point as I
00:19:06.240 understand it with the
00:19:07.240 clarification is still
00:19:09.120 lacks context.
00:19:11.460 context, the context
00:19:12.760 being that everything's
00:19:13.640 changed since then.
00:19:14.780 We don't need the
00:19:15.780 extra, you know, legal
00:19:17.960 push or whatever it
00:19:19.000 was to make us want to
00:19:21.400 have a diverse place.
00:19:24.060 You put me in a college,
00:19:25.400 make me the dean of the
00:19:26.340 college, I'm going to
00:19:27.600 push for diversity.
00:19:29.280 I hate to say it.
00:19:30.800 I mean, because you
00:19:31.380 might not like to hear
00:19:32.180 it.
00:19:32.920 But it's necessary.
00:19:35.100 You just don't want to
00:19:35.880 be crazy about it.
00:19:37.220 Right?
00:19:37.460 You just don't want to
00:19:38.460 give up merit to do
00:19:41.440 it.
00:19:42.020 So do everything you
00:19:42.980 can, but I wouldn't
00:19:44.640 make, but I wouldn't
00:19:45.620 prevent white people
00:19:47.220 from getting jobs.
00:19:49.140 That's too far.
00:19:50.800 But if you could do
00:19:51.820 maybe a stronger job
00:19:53.660 of outreach, maybe a
00:19:55.900 better job of being a
00:19:57.000 good place to work for
00:19:58.560 all kinds of people,
00:19:59.940 you know, you could
00:20:00.460 attack the situation a
00:20:02.400 number of ways without
00:20:04.380 discriminating against
00:20:05.440 white people.
00:20:07.000 You wouldn't have to.
00:20:08.540 It just could be one
00:20:09.560 thing that could happen.
00:20:10.240 Now, so I told you that
00:20:13.520 Michael Shermer,
00:20:14.420 surprisingly, didn't have
00:20:16.440 a problem with the
00:20:17.140 ruling, but here's one
00:20:18.600 that might surprise you,
00:20:20.740 and I'm just going to
00:20:21.560 give some props to this
00:20:23.180 individual.
00:20:24.420 You know, Cenk Uyger from
00:20:27.320 the Young Turks?
00:20:29.600 A political pundit type
00:20:31.200 person, quite prominent.
00:20:32.440 He's heavily left-oriented.
00:20:36.720 You would expect him to
00:20:38.080 hate this decision,
00:20:40.080 wouldn't you?
00:20:41.180 He did not.
00:20:42.860 He agrees with the
00:20:43.920 decision completely, and I
00:20:46.000 give him credit for that.
00:20:47.180 It is not easy to piss in
00:20:49.820 the face of your entire
00:20:50.940 audience, which he just
00:20:51.980 did.
00:20:53.060 He just took a big old piss
00:20:54.740 right in the face of his
00:20:55.760 entire audience, because you
00:20:56.860 know they don't agree with
00:20:57.780 that, but he gives his
00:20:59.620 reasons, and he sticks by
00:21:01.800 it, and he's clear, and I've
00:21:03.460 got immense respect for
00:21:04.660 that.
00:21:05.300 You know, he has other
00:21:05.920 opinions that I don't like
00:21:06.900 so much, but this, he is
00:21:11.020 deeply improving his
00:21:12.740 credibility, in my opinion.
00:21:13.960 I want to read what he
00:21:17.140 said, because the way he
00:21:19.560 said it was actually my
00:21:20.780 exact opinion.
00:21:22.480 So if you want to know my
00:21:23.560 exact opinion, it comes
00:21:26.020 from Cenk, of all things.
00:21:28.820 Like, who saw that coming
00:21:29.880 today, that he and I would
00:21:31.620 be agreeing completely on
00:21:33.840 this issue?
00:21:34.640 So here's what he says.
00:21:36.140 He says, I think Supreme
00:21:37.160 Court got the affirmative
00:21:37.980 action case right.
00:21:39.420 I'm sick of the stereotypes
00:21:41.240 that attach to all minorities
00:21:43.480 because of this policy.
00:21:45.140 That's what I think.
00:21:46.200 It was necessary in the
00:21:47.840 beginning, that's what I
00:21:48.860 think, but it has become
00:21:50.240 counterproductive, that's
00:21:51.480 what I think.
00:21:52.360 But legacy admissions, which
00:21:54.460 is more unfair, meaning you
00:21:56.260 get in because your parents
00:21:57.880 went to the college, must be
00:22:00.700 banned.
00:22:01.460 And I guess he's working on
00:22:02.500 getting that banned.
00:22:03.680 Now, I don't have a strong
00:22:04.960 opinion about legacy
00:22:06.240 admissions.
00:22:08.460 Not really.
00:22:10.200 I mean, they do it to do
00:22:11.660 fundraising, and it can't be
00:22:13.460 that many people, is it?
00:22:15.180 Like, what percentage of
00:22:16.240 Harvard are legacies?
00:22:18.340 Is it just a really high
00:22:20.080 number?
00:22:21.860 I mean, if it's over, do
00:22:23.120 you think 25%, 25%.
00:22:24.940 It's funny, I was just
00:22:26.400 going to say 25%.
00:22:27.540 If it's over 25%, it's way
00:22:30.580 too much.
00:22:32.160 Because I do think that
00:22:33.200 would be too much, right?
00:22:35.420 Does anybody know what the
00:22:36.240 actual number is?
00:22:37.300 If it's 5%, why does
00:22:39.140 anybody care?
00:22:39.700 Yeah, I don't know.
00:22:43.040 So I'll just go with, if it's
00:22:44.480 5%, I don't care.
00:22:45.760 If it's 25%, it's worth the
00:22:47.560 discussion.
00:22:49.240 You think it's over 25?
00:22:51.900 If it's over 25%, but they
00:22:54.400 were also massively favoring
00:22:57.860 minority applicants, that would
00:23:00.960 leave basically no unrelated
00:23:04.620 white people any spots
00:23:06.140 whatsoever, right?
00:23:06.920 You know, once you got rid of
00:23:09.380 all the legacies, and then
00:23:11.860 you packed it with all the
00:23:13.220 minorities that you're trying
00:23:14.260 to attract, what's left?
00:23:16.600 There's probably no space
00:23:17.700 left.
00:23:20.060 So I'm hearing people say it
00:23:21.740 is 36%, somebody's saying.
00:23:24.900 Close to 40%.
00:23:25.760 Okay, then I agree.
00:23:27.360 Then I guess Cenk and I have
00:23:29.180 100% agreement on this.
00:23:32.740 Who in the world saw that
00:23:33.800 coming?
00:23:34.820 This is the craziest day.
00:23:36.920 It's just a crazy day.
00:23:40.260 Who would have seen me
00:23:41.600 unabashedly defending Biden's
00:23:45.220 staffer?
00:23:47.020 That happened today.
00:23:48.660 This is weirdly bringing us
00:23:50.080 together.
00:23:50.560 Have you noticed that?
00:23:52.380 That this decision is weirdly
00:23:55.180 causing us to unite in all the
00:23:58.120 strangest ways.
00:23:58.960 I know that we're going to talk
00:24:00.160 about where we're disagreeing,
00:24:01.780 like all the discussion will be
00:24:03.220 where we disagree.
00:24:03.980 But I feel like just under the
00:24:06.020 hood, there's something else
00:24:07.820 happening.
00:24:10.220 There's sort of a, I'd say,
00:24:12.820 a more sophisticated view of it.
00:24:18.240 Because I think that no matter
00:24:19.580 what side you're on, you could see
00:24:21.620 the current situation as
00:24:22.900 unproductive.
00:24:23.740 That's what Cenk is saying.
00:24:25.040 That's what I think.
00:24:25.700 So I like diversity.
00:24:28.720 I like wokeness a little bit.
00:24:30.920 I just don't like too much of it.
00:24:32.920 You know, when it goes too far.
00:24:35.440 So this is a good adjustment.
00:24:38.060 And I think that the, you know,
00:24:40.920 I've been telling you for a while
00:24:42.080 that the wokeness peak has been
00:24:46.000 reached.
00:24:47.340 And you can tell by the absurdity.
00:24:49.880 You know, the level of absurdity.
00:24:52.000 You know, the whole Dylan Mulvaney thing.
00:24:53.860 And so this is not just people
00:24:55.960 disagreeing about stuff.
00:24:57.860 This is just flat-end absurdity.
00:25:00.540 And once you reach the point where
00:25:01.900 all of the stories in this domain
00:25:03.780 are just absurd,
00:25:05.820 they're not even really things you
00:25:07.560 should even bother talking about.
00:25:09.020 They're just crazy shit.
00:25:10.420 Once it reaches that, then people
00:25:11.980 start to see it as crazy shit.
00:25:14.440 And then they can start moderating.
00:25:16.460 You know, you want to keep the stuff
00:25:17.680 that was good.
00:25:18.280 I don't think the wokeness thing was bad.
00:25:22.040 I think it just went too far.
00:25:23.700 And now we're going to adjust back
00:25:25.020 and keep the stuff that was good.
00:25:27.140 I like the part where we treat each other
00:25:29.120 with respect.
00:25:30.540 Let's keep that part.
00:25:32.740 Because I don't think we had enough
00:25:34.060 respect for each other.
00:25:36.000 So if what we get out of this
00:25:37.700 is more respect for people
00:25:39.580 who are different from us,
00:25:41.380 good.
00:25:42.440 But you've got to bring it back a little bit.
00:25:44.420 All right.
00:25:47.840 I loved watching Cornel West
00:25:50.000 react to this with Dana Bash.
00:25:53.760 And I'm going to tell you some
00:25:55.080 behind-the-scenes stuff.
00:25:58.140 And you can't ask me how I know.
00:26:01.460 So Dana Bash, if you didn't know,
00:26:04.060 is white.
00:26:05.540 Cornel West, a very interesting character,
00:26:09.700 is black.
00:26:11.540 Or identifies as black.
00:26:14.420 I guess I'm going to say that
00:26:17.400 because I was watching him yesterday
00:26:18.420 and I thought,
00:26:18.960 it's weird that he doesn't look black.
00:26:21.060 But he identifies as black
00:26:23.080 and I'm not going to question that.
00:26:25.220 But,
00:26:26.240 so he was very upset
00:26:28.100 about the Supreme Court ruling
00:26:29.560 and quite visibly upset.
00:26:32.740 And,
00:26:33.280 who was it who said this?
00:26:35.040 Oh, Jesse Waters said this.
00:26:37.860 Jesse Waters said this yesterday.
00:26:40.120 And maybe it surprises you
00:26:41.680 coming from him,
00:26:42.420 but also maybe he's
00:26:44.740 trying to grow into his new job.
00:26:47.560 You know,
00:26:47.920 his prominence at Fox News
00:26:50.180 is higher
00:26:51.340 because he's taken the Tucker spot.
00:26:53.740 So maybe he's just trying to
00:26:55.480 modify his game.
00:26:57.700 So he started out
00:26:58.660 his commentary about this.
00:27:00.460 The very first comment was,
00:27:02.400 we should all,
00:27:03.000 we should all understand
00:27:04.000 that this is devastating
00:27:05.400 to black Americans.
00:27:06.820 Not all of them,
00:27:08.320 but a lot.
00:27:08.840 and I actually
00:27:11.320 appreciated that.
00:27:12.460 I respected that a lot.
00:27:13.900 Because he started with,
00:27:15.560 there's a victim here.
00:27:17.400 Now,
00:27:17.620 whether you think,
00:27:18.360 whether you think
00:27:19.740 affirmative action
00:27:21.320 was right or wrong,
00:27:23.420 unrelated to the thing,
00:27:25.160 there are people
00:27:25.760 who are having
00:27:26.400 an experience,
00:27:27.480 a lived experience,
00:27:28.380 which is very negative,
00:27:29.620 and I care about that.
00:27:31.720 Because,
00:27:32.660 they're Americans,
00:27:33.620 they're humans,
00:27:34.380 they're people,
00:27:35.580 they're just people
00:27:36.160 I disagree with
00:27:37.120 on some political details,
00:27:38.880 but I don't want
00:27:39.660 to see them suffering.
00:27:41.180 I don't want to see
00:27:41.940 anybody waking up
00:27:43.480 to a bad day.
00:27:44.960 That's not on my list.
00:27:47.380 So I will also
00:27:48.600 give some respect
00:27:49.660 to Jesse Waters,
00:27:51.380 who often is,
00:27:52.140 you know,
00:27:52.440 more the joker.
00:27:53.800 But in this case,
00:27:55.060 I think he hit the target
00:27:58.160 exactly.
00:27:59.580 Start with the fact,
00:28:00.780 and I should have
00:28:01.260 done it too.
00:28:02.520 You know,
00:28:02.800 I regret that
00:28:03.400 I didn't do that.
00:28:04.000 So I thought
00:28:04.980 that was a good model
00:28:05.900 for behavior,
00:28:07.260 which is to acknowledge
00:28:08.440 that somebody's suffering,
00:28:10.660 and it's going
00:28:12.200 to have an impact.
00:28:13.640 And that might blow
00:28:14.520 back on you too.
00:28:15.720 You know,
00:28:15.960 you're not independent
00:28:17.700 from the suffering
00:28:18.820 of other Americans.
00:28:21.240 So,
00:28:21.720 having said that,
00:28:24.660 Dana Bash
00:28:25.540 talking to
00:28:26.440 Cornel West.
00:28:27.980 So Cornel West
00:28:28.600 was a good example
00:28:29.460 of a black American
00:28:30.980 having a tough time
00:28:32.800 with it.
00:28:34.000 but
00:28:34.320 I think
00:28:36.720 this is just speculation
00:28:38.940 because I can't read minds.
00:28:40.960 I suspect that a lot
00:28:42.220 of what is bothering them,
00:28:44.740 the black Americans
00:28:45.680 in particular,
00:28:46.680 is the feeling
00:28:47.520 that what's behind it
00:28:48.540 is racism.
00:28:50.240 And I don't think it is.
00:28:51.940 I really don't think it is.
00:28:53.560 But you can imagine
00:28:54.780 why they would think that.
00:28:56.180 Like,
00:28:56.500 if you were a certain age
00:28:57.560 and born in a certain time,
00:28:59.040 and you'd gone through
00:29:00.180 a lot of the real,
00:29:01.460 real racism,
00:29:02.220 you would naturally
00:29:04.340 suspect
00:29:06.160 that maybe
00:29:07.640 that's behind this.
00:29:08.760 It's just people
00:29:09.300 don't say it that way.
00:29:10.680 Maybe that's what it is.
00:29:12.300 So he was quite upset.
00:29:14.120 But what was
00:29:15.240 fascinating about it
00:29:16.360 was Dana Bash
00:29:17.280 asked him
00:29:18.340 this question,
00:29:19.600 which caused him
00:29:20.940 to melt down
00:29:21.980 into total word salad.
00:29:23.700 and she said,
00:29:26.060 what would you say
00:29:27.640 to Asian Americans?
00:29:31.860 That's it.
00:29:33.220 What would you say
00:29:34.080 to Asian Americans?
00:29:37.420 How do you tell them
00:29:38.420 they can't go to college
00:29:39.340 because they're not black?
00:29:40.760 She didn't say that,
00:29:41.580 but that's built
00:29:42.380 into the question.
00:29:44.240 Now,
00:29:45.340 would you expect
00:29:46.080 CNN to ask that question?
00:29:47.420 because that
00:29:51.000 completely
00:29:51.920 turned him
00:29:53.200 into an idiot
00:29:53.920 right in front of you.
00:29:56.320 He couldn't answer it
00:29:57.720 because answering it
00:29:59.820 would reveal
00:30:00.520 that he was a racist,
00:30:02.100 which apparently he is.
00:30:03.920 I mean,
00:30:04.480 overtly.
00:30:06.120 I mean,
00:30:06.880 his reaction to this,
00:30:09.200 I don't know
00:30:09.820 how you can,
00:30:11.320 I don't know
00:30:12.040 any way to paint it
00:30:12.880 other than
00:30:13.380 overtly racist.
00:30:14.540 He overtly,
00:30:17.080 directly,
00:30:17.920 and unambiguously
00:30:18.720 prefers
00:30:19.480 fewer Asian Americans
00:30:21.980 getting into these colleges
00:30:23.200 so that a greater percentage
00:30:24.480 of black people can.
00:30:26.560 I don't know
00:30:27.340 what to call that.
00:30:28.720 That is racist
00:30:30.160 by definition.
00:30:33.140 Now,
00:30:33.540 you could argue
00:30:34.020 that affirmative action
00:30:34.960 is racist
00:30:35.620 because it is
00:30:37.140 by design.
00:30:39.160 So,
00:30:39.580 one of the things
00:30:40.160 I would love to add
00:30:41.020 to our conversation
00:30:42.180 to fix everything
00:30:43.420 and I've never
00:30:44.920 heard anybody
00:30:45.360 say this before
00:30:46.080 directly,
00:30:46.680 but again,
00:30:47.560 this is one of the things
00:30:48.260 I can say
00:30:48.920 because I'm cancelled.
00:30:50.380 So,
00:30:50.700 let me say
00:30:51.120 what only a cancelled
00:30:52.040 person can say.
00:30:53.880 Not all racism
00:30:54.600 is bad.
00:30:58.880 There you go.
00:31:01.140 Did you like
00:31:01.860 hearing that?
00:31:02.640 Not all racism
00:31:03.500 is bad.
00:31:04.920 The problem is
00:31:05.760 we act like
00:31:06.300 it all is.
00:31:07.940 But affirmative action,
00:31:09.160 as I just said,
00:31:10.120 I thought had
00:31:10.720 an important role
00:31:12.420 in American history.
00:31:13.980 It was very racist,
00:31:15.420 but it was good.
00:31:18.140 See the point?
00:31:19.500 It was racist,
00:31:21.060 but it's good.
00:31:22.560 I'm in favor
00:31:23.420 of funding
00:31:24.060 the historically
00:31:25.000 black colleges.
00:31:27.200 Completely racist,
00:31:29.080 but I think
00:31:29.860 more good than bad.
00:31:32.060 I'm in favor of it.
00:31:34.560 I'm in favor
00:31:35.580 of TV
00:31:37.300 and movies
00:31:39.440 and commercials
00:31:40.400 and even colleges
00:31:42.920 considering race
00:31:44.860 when they make
00:31:46.320 their decisions.
00:31:47.440 I'm in favor of that.
00:31:48.860 I do think
00:31:49.520 all of those things
00:31:50.360 should have
00:31:51.760 some effort
00:31:52.500 to be like
00:31:54.360 the American character.
00:31:55.560 But it's totally racist.
00:31:59.280 Isn't it?
00:32:00.540 How can it not be?
00:32:01.380 It is by design,
00:32:03.620 overtly,
00:32:04.300 we're trying to
00:32:05.040 change the mix
00:32:05.960 of race
00:32:06.520 in this situation.
00:32:08.980 That's overtly racist.
00:32:11.240 But it's the good kind.
00:32:13.900 Right?
00:32:14.740 So I think
00:32:15.720 part of the problem
00:32:16.360 is we keep
00:32:17.280 arguing with each other
00:32:19.120 as if all racism
00:32:20.180 is bad
00:32:20.900 when in fact
00:32:22.200 there's a whole
00:32:23.160 category of racism
00:32:24.880 that we intentionally
00:32:25.900 pursue
00:32:26.480 because we
00:32:27.920 generally think,
00:32:28.860 oh,
00:32:29.000 that's actually
00:32:29.500 pretty good.
00:32:30.040 not 100% good.
00:32:32.340 Right?
00:32:32.800 Because even trying
00:32:33.800 to add diversity
00:32:34.580 to your organization,
00:32:36.160 a perfectly good
00:32:37.180 objective,
00:32:38.860 will end up
00:32:40.300 accidentally
00:32:40.980 discriminating
00:32:42.280 against white people.
00:32:43.460 Of course.
00:32:45.160 You know,
00:32:45.580 that's not the intention.
00:32:47.900 But of course
00:32:48.480 it would happen.
00:32:49.200 Of course it would happen.
00:32:50.860 So,
00:32:51.720 these are
00:32:52.140 complicated things
00:32:53.220 where you have to look
00:32:53.780 at the societal benefit,
00:32:56.100 but you also have to
00:32:57.000 look at the fact
00:32:57.580 that there are going
00:32:58.100 to be some people
00:32:58.900 who,
00:32:59.180 you know,
00:32:59.660 getting the knife
00:33:00.580 in the back.
00:33:01.960 And maybe you balance
00:33:03.200 those and say,
00:33:03.900 well,
00:33:04.200 for a little while
00:33:05.040 we'll let a few people
00:33:06.100 get knifed
00:33:06.700 for the greater good.
00:33:08.380 You know,
00:33:08.940 these are complicated
00:33:09.620 things.
00:33:11.060 But anyway,
00:33:12.660 here's what I wanted
00:33:13.580 to say.
00:33:13.920 Do you believe
00:33:15.420 that the white
00:33:16.700 correspondents
00:33:17.720 of CNN
00:33:18.300 are opposed
00:33:19.800 or in favor
00:33:21.100 of college admissions
00:33:22.720 being determined
00:33:23.480 by racial identity?
00:33:26.400 What do you think?
00:33:27.180 The white
00:33:28.380 CNN hosts.
00:33:31.120 Do you believe
00:33:31.780 that they
00:33:32.340 are opposed
00:33:33.560 to this decision
00:33:34.600 today?
00:33:38.240 Well,
00:33:38.880 let me give you
00:33:39.600 some background.
00:33:40.920 The white
00:33:41.680 CNN hosts
00:33:43.060 have,
00:33:44.600 in some cases,
00:33:45.340 children who are
00:33:45.940 trying to get
00:33:46.480 into college
00:33:47.060 and having troubles.
00:33:48.720 But in all cases,
00:33:50.060 they have friends
00:33:50.800 who are white
00:33:51.760 whose kids
00:33:53.000 can't get into
00:33:53.600 the colleges
00:33:54.100 that they want
00:33:54.740 to get into.
00:33:55.840 So that's your
00:33:56.400 behind the scenes.
00:33:58.020 Now,
00:33:58.340 I'm not guessing
00:33:58.980 about that.
00:34:00.100 I can't say
00:34:00.700 any more about it.
00:34:01.800 I'm just telling you
00:34:02.460 I'm not guessing.
00:34:04.380 Right?
00:34:05.460 The white
00:34:06.720 correspondents
00:34:07.520 on CNN
00:34:08.020 were not in favor
00:34:09.820 of affirmative
00:34:11.420 action in college
00:34:12.440 because their own
00:34:13.840 children were
00:34:14.600 impacted.
00:34:15.760 Their own children
00:34:16.620 or the children
00:34:17.540 of their best friends
00:34:18.500 or their sister's
00:34:19.900 children,
00:34:20.560 you know,
00:34:20.780 that sort of thing.
00:34:21.940 But all of the
00:34:23.240 liberals,
00:34:23.720 the liberals
00:34:24.920 who grew up
00:34:25.540 thinking this
00:34:26.040 was a good idea
00:34:26.880 just found out
00:34:28.280 it's screwing
00:34:29.140 their children
00:34:29.880 and their friends'
00:34:31.700 children's.
00:34:33.480 When Dana Bash
00:34:34.980 asked that question,
00:34:36.120 what would you say
00:34:36.740 to the Asian Americans?
00:34:39.320 That was a kill shot.
00:34:41.680 That was a
00:34:42.440 no fucking around
00:34:43.220 question.
00:34:44.720 That's not what
00:34:45.500 they do.
00:34:47.280 That's not how
00:34:48.180 CNN normally acts.
00:34:50.800 You know,
00:34:50.980 normally they take
00:34:51.820 a side.
00:34:53.040 Right?
00:34:53.160 Normally they do.
00:34:54.500 Unless it's just
00:34:55.200 a news story.
00:34:56.260 Like, you know,
00:34:56.960 if a president
00:34:57.640 murdered somebody,
00:34:59.020 they'd tell you that
00:34:59.840 even if it was
00:35:00.720 their guy
00:35:01.220 because it's
00:35:01.920 just a fact.
00:35:03.360 But when they
00:35:04.080 ask a question
00:35:05.320 in a certain way,
00:35:06.820 when they elicit
00:35:07.860 answers in a certain
00:35:09.620 way,
00:35:09.980 that's all
00:35:10.420 narrative.
00:35:12.500 So this was
00:35:13.220 clearly in the
00:35:14.460 domain of narrative.
00:35:15.500 And Dana Bash
00:35:17.740 of CNN
00:35:19.720 determined that the
00:35:22.500 narrative was
00:35:23.340 that this
00:35:24.440 screws Asian
00:35:25.160 Americans.
00:35:29.240 And she
00:35:30.160 made a black
00:35:30.700 guy try to
00:35:31.280 answer that
00:35:31.720 question,
00:35:32.300 and he
00:35:32.860 couldn't.
00:35:33.600 He had to
00:35:34.000 change the
00:35:34.400 subject.
00:35:36.020 Now, that's
00:35:37.280 the question
00:35:37.720 everybody should
00:35:38.360 be asked.
00:35:39.780 Because if
00:35:40.480 you're still in
00:35:40.960 favor of
00:35:41.360 affirmative action
00:35:42.140 knowing it's
00:35:42.700 screwing Asian
00:35:43.340 Americans,
00:35:44.880 explain it.
00:35:45.540 You tell me
00:35:47.080 why they
00:35:47.480 should have
00:35:47.820 less access
00:35:48.600 after all
00:35:49.600 their good
00:35:50.000 works and
00:35:50.520 staying out
00:35:50.940 of jail and
00:35:51.420 staying off
00:35:51.880 drugs.
00:35:52.780 We're going
00:35:53.320 to penalize
00:35:53.900 them for
00:35:54.600 doing everything
00:35:55.300 right.
00:35:56.980 Explain it.
00:35:58.320 Give me your
00:35:59.320 rationalization
00:36:00.260 for penalizing
00:36:01.940 a racial group
00:36:02.960 in America
00:36:03.500 who did
00:36:04.320 everything
00:36:04.660 right.
00:36:07.960 Good luck.
00:36:09.000 Good luck
00:36:09.580 explaining that.
00:36:11.140 All right.
00:36:12.060 So that'll be
00:36:12.660 fun.
00:36:13.080 I expect a lot
00:36:14.360 more people to
00:36:14.900 get that
00:36:15.200 question.
00:36:18.800 I also
00:36:19.580 wonder if
00:36:20.040 there's any
00:36:20.540 infighting at
00:36:22.360 CNN and
00:36:23.420 MSNBC.
00:36:24.640 Because I
00:36:25.280 feel like this
00:36:26.000 divided them.
00:36:28.100 You know,
00:36:28.440 much like
00:36:28.940 Progrosian and
00:36:30.820 Putin.
00:36:32.280 So I think
00:36:32.960 everybody's Russia
00:36:33.800 today.
00:36:34.780 Like all the
00:36:35.680 left-leaning
00:36:36.220 organizations that
00:36:37.200 they just turned
00:36:37.740 into Russia
00:36:38.340 were, you know,
00:36:40.060 don't you think
00:36:40.500 Joy Reid is
00:36:41.220 trying to find
00:36:41.820 the traitors?
00:36:42.360 I'm laughing
00:36:46.980 at my own
00:36:47.480 joke.
00:36:49.200 It's just
00:36:49.940 like Putin.
00:36:51.180 Joy Reid is
00:36:52.020 probably looking
00:36:52.800 at MSNBC
00:36:53.820 saying,
00:36:54.860 wait a minute,
00:36:56.240 I said it
00:36:56.880 was a terrible
00:36:57.700 worst decision
00:36:58.840 ever,
00:37:00.200 but that
00:37:00.940 guy,
00:37:01.740 he's a little
00:37:03.120 quiet.
00:37:04.740 He said he's
00:37:06.200 just talking
00:37:06.700 about it
00:37:07.080 factually.
00:37:07.840 I don't
00:37:09.300 feel like
00:37:09.920 he's as
00:37:10.360 sad as
00:37:10.940 he should
00:37:11.300 be.
00:37:12.640 I'm not
00:37:13.140 sure he's
00:37:13.620 on my
00:37:14.040 side.
00:37:15.760 So CNN
00:37:16.400 and MSNBC
00:37:17.400 just turned
00:37:18.020 into Russia
00:37:18.640 with Putin
00:37:19.760 looking for
00:37:20.240 the traitors.
00:37:23.820 That's fun.
00:37:24.960 I mean,
00:37:25.220 I assume
00:37:25.620 that's what's
00:37:26.040 happening.
00:37:27.560 All right.
00:37:29.600 Let's see
00:37:30.420 if I covered
00:37:31.460 all those
00:37:32.100 points.
00:37:34.580 So here's
00:37:35.400 the next
00:37:35.680 question.
00:37:36.320 So people
00:37:36.680 are asking,
00:37:37.140 will Biden
00:37:37.980 react to
00:37:39.200 this by
00:37:39.600 packing the
00:37:40.300 court?
00:37:41.060 So for
00:37:41.640 those two
00:37:42.960 or three
00:37:43.220 people who
00:37:43.640 don't know,
00:37:44.780 apparently the
00:37:45.440 Constitution
00:37:45.880 does not
00:37:46.700 specify how
00:37:48.360 many members
00:37:49.400 of the
00:37:49.780 Supreme Court
00:37:50.360 there are.
00:37:51.500 So a
00:37:52.000 president could
00:37:52.580 just say,
00:37:53.120 oh, I
00:37:53.500 think there
00:37:53.820 should be
00:37:54.040 100,
00:37:55.420 and then
00:37:55.860 appoint 100
00:37:56.860 justices,
00:37:58.040 and then
00:37:58.380 just appoint
00:37:58.920 100 Democrats,
00:38:01.160 and then the
00:38:01.900 Democrats would
00:38:02.600 just win every
00:38:03.460 Supreme Court.
00:38:05.240 Completely
00:38:05.800 doable.
00:38:06.280 apparently there's
00:38:08.900 no constitutional
00:38:09.780 obstacle to
00:38:12.140 doing that.
00:38:13.600 However,
00:38:14.940 what would be
00:38:15.500 the obvious
00:38:16.200 thing that
00:38:16.700 would happen?
00:38:17.800 The obvious
00:38:18.740 thing that
00:38:19.100 would happen
00:38:19.480 is that it
00:38:20.160 would encourage
00:38:21.480 a Republican
00:38:22.240 to win.
00:38:24.540 It would
00:38:24.760 probably help
00:38:25.280 their chances,
00:38:26.260 because it
00:38:26.620 would seem
00:38:26.940 so ridiculously
00:38:27.820 unfair.
00:38:28.660 It would be
00:38:29.020 the end of
00:38:29.440 the Republic,
00:38:30.360 because Republicans
00:38:31.400 would then say,
00:38:32.240 well, now I think
00:38:33.620 the Supreme Court
00:38:34.280 is 200 people.
00:38:36.680 I'm going to add
00:38:37.780 another 100
00:38:38.320 Republicans,
00:38:39.060 and we'll win
00:38:39.580 every time.
00:38:40.860 Well, as soon
00:38:41.680 as you get that
00:38:42.220 cycle going of
00:38:44.240 we'll make sure
00:38:45.000 the Supreme Court
00:38:45.660 is packed as
00:38:46.340 soon as we get
00:38:46.800 in, the moment
00:38:47.880 you start that,
00:38:49.100 that's the end
00:38:49.640 of the Republic,
00:38:51.040 because it takes
00:38:52.380 away the
00:38:52.760 independence of
00:38:53.540 the judiciary.
00:38:54.440 And the only
00:38:55.480 thing that makes
00:38:55.980 our system work
00:38:56.860 is the famous
00:38:58.460 checks and
00:38:59.000 balances.
00:39:00.040 You know,
00:39:00.200 the executive
00:39:00.800 can't order
00:39:01.720 the courts,
00:39:03.060 can't order
00:39:03.480 the Congress,
00:39:04.400 Congress can't
00:39:05.020 order the executive.
00:39:06.180 The fact that
00:39:06.820 they don't have
00:39:07.480 power over each
00:39:08.280 other is the
00:39:08.940 only thing that
00:39:09.580 makes it work.
00:39:10.980 You take that
00:39:11.620 out and the
00:39:12.480 whole thing
00:39:12.800 falls apart
00:39:13.400 in a day.
00:39:15.100 I mean, I'm
00:39:15.400 not talking about
00:39:15.980 something that
00:39:16.460 would fall apart
00:39:17.060 eventually.
00:39:18.380 The whole thing's
00:39:18.940 gone.
00:39:20.080 The moment you
00:39:21.020 do that, the
00:39:21.640 whole Republic
00:39:22.380 is fucking
00:39:23.120 gone.
00:39:24.720 Now, do you
00:39:25.680 think Biden
00:39:26.160 knows that?
00:39:27.600 Well, he used
00:39:28.240 to.
00:39:28.900 I mean, we
00:39:29.240 don't know
00:39:29.720 what his
00:39:30.480 mental capacity
00:39:31.240 is, but he
00:39:32.160 used to say
00:39:32.620 directly that
00:39:33.620 it was the
00:39:33.980 dumbest idea
00:39:34.740 because everybody
00:39:36.560 who's smart
00:39:37.260 and experienced
00:39:38.120 knows it's
00:39:40.000 the dumbest
00:39:40.780 idea.
00:39:42.440 So, given
00:39:43.340 that everybody
00:39:44.160 smart knows
00:39:45.000 that packing
00:39:45.460 the court,
00:39:46.740 even though it
00:39:47.200 might feel good
00:39:48.000 temporarily,
00:39:48.840 would be the
00:39:49.680 worst idea
00:39:50.560 for everyone.
00:39:52.820 So, I'm
00:39:53.520 predicting it'll
00:39:54.100 happen.
00:39:57.700 I'm just
00:39:58.420 joking.
00:39:59.540 I'm just
00:39:59.980 joking.
00:40:01.120 No, I'm
00:40:01.760 predicting it
00:40:02.340 won't happen.
00:40:03.900 But, if we
00:40:06.020 really go ahead
00:40:07.020 and do the
00:40:07.700 worst dumb
00:40:09.380 fuck thing
00:40:10.020 that a country
00:40:10.580 could ever do
00:40:11.200 to itself,
00:40:12.480 we deserve to
00:40:13.640 not be a
00:40:14.080 country anymore.
00:40:16.760 If we get
00:40:18.060 across this
00:40:18.780 bar, like,
00:40:19.960 the bar to
00:40:20.660 remain a
00:40:21.160 country is
00:40:21.720 really low.
00:40:23.600 Seal the
00:40:24.060 borders,
00:40:25.260 collect some
00:40:25.800 taxes, and
00:40:27.540 don't pack the
00:40:28.580 court.
00:40:29.540 That's it.
00:40:31.280 That's it.
00:40:32.500 You just, you
00:40:33.100 know, a little
00:40:33.560 border security,
00:40:34.760 pay some taxes.
00:40:37.240 That's it.
00:40:38.220 It's kind of
00:40:38.780 easy.
00:40:39.500 But we might
00:40:40.280 not be able to
00:40:40.920 clear the bar.
00:40:42.760 That's where we
00:40:43.500 are, 2023.
00:40:45.820 All right, let's
00:40:46.480 talk about
00:40:47.020 RFK Jr.
00:40:48.080 Boy, it's
00:40:52.580 hard to have
00:40:53.020 an opinion in
00:40:53.760 2023, isn't
00:40:54.940 it?
00:40:55.640 Because you
00:40:56.280 put your
00:40:56.580 opinion out
00:40:57.120 there and
00:40:57.480 then it
00:40:57.740 just gets
00:40:58.160 smashed to
00:40:59.480 smithereens
00:41:00.060 before the
00:41:00.600 end of the
00:41:01.140 day's news
00:41:02.140 cycle.
00:41:03.240 So, for a
00:41:04.260 full day, I
00:41:05.280 was thinking
00:41:05.700 that RFK
00:41:06.400 Jr. had all
00:41:07.540 the right
00:41:07.900 arguments and
00:41:08.680 he was doing
00:41:09.220 exactly what
00:41:11.260 I'd want
00:41:12.560 someone to
00:41:13.300 do if
00:41:14.320 their intention
00:41:14.880 was to bring
00:41:15.560 the country
00:41:16.020 together.
00:41:17.780 And I
00:41:18.500 thought he
00:41:18.740 was doing
00:41:18.980 a great
00:41:19.300 job of
00:41:19.700 it.
00:41:21.960 However,
00:41:23.820 yesterday
00:41:24.580 afternoon
00:41:25.260 happened.
00:41:27.620 A lot
00:41:28.300 can change
00:41:28.740 in an
00:41:29.020 afternoon.
00:41:30.260 So, one
00:41:30.880 of the
00:41:31.040 things that
00:41:31.400 changed was
00:41:32.060 RFK Jr.
00:41:33.360 came out
00:41:33.860 solidly against
00:41:36.020 the ending
00:41:36.940 of affirmative
00:41:37.560 action.
00:41:38.740 So, he's
00:41:39.160 solidly for
00:41:39.900 it.
00:41:41.280 That lost
00:41:42.240 him 100%
00:41:43.440 of the
00:41:44.560 right.
00:41:45.560 100%.
00:41:46.620 There won't
00:41:47.760 be a single
00:41:48.580 person who
00:41:49.840 he's been
00:41:50.420 actively courting
00:41:51.740 for months
00:41:52.400 who is still
00:41:53.720 on his side.
00:41:54.260 He lost
00:41:54.600 them all.
00:41:55.640 And they're
00:41:55.900 not coming
00:41:56.360 back.
00:41:58.320 That is
00:41:59.420 game over.
00:42:02.140 That is
00:42:02.720 game fucking
00:42:03.900 over.
00:42:04.760 Because this
00:42:05.420 is an opinion
00:42:05.940 that even
00:42:06.620 Cenk, even
00:42:08.460 Cenk disagrees
00:42:09.320 with.
00:42:10.080 Even Michael
00:42:10.820 Shermer
00:42:11.420 disagrees with.
00:42:13.680 And they're
00:42:13.940 just two who
00:42:14.940 are brave enough
00:42:15.540 to say it
00:42:15.920 in public.
00:42:16.280 You don't
00:42:17.040 think there
00:42:17.420 are a whole
00:42:17.940 bunch of
00:42:18.440 other people
00:42:18.940 who are
00:42:19.520 Democrats
00:42:20.040 who also
00:42:21.220 disagreed with
00:42:22.000 affirmative
00:42:22.360 action?
00:42:23.780 Really?
00:42:25.080 Really?
00:42:25.720 You don't
00:42:26.300 think there's
00:42:26.700 a good
00:42:27.580 clump of
00:42:28.120 Democrats
00:42:28.660 who are
00:42:29.260 maybe
00:42:29.900 silently
00:42:30.560 but secretly
00:42:32.000 pretty happy
00:42:32.760 because now
00:42:33.200 their kids
00:42:33.560 can get
00:42:33.940 into college?
00:42:35.320 Well, I
00:42:36.020 think there
00:42:36.320 is a big
00:42:36.700 group of
00:42:37.220 that.
00:42:37.420 So RFK
00:42:40.160 just traded
00:42:40.800 away 100%
00:42:42.020 of the
00:42:42.780 right-leaning
00:42:44.080 independents
00:42:44.980 and Republicans.
00:42:46.820 And what
00:42:47.340 did he buy
00:42:48.200 back?
00:42:50.000 What did he
00:42:50.660 get in return?
00:42:52.740 Nothing?
00:42:54.420 Kind of
00:42:54.960 nothing?
00:42:56.340 Because being
00:42:58.040 against affirmative
00:42:58.820 action is sort
00:42:59.720 of the minimum
00:43:01.120 buy-in to be a
00:43:02.160 Democrat.
00:43:02.460 And I
00:43:04.180 believe,
00:43:04.780 can you give
00:43:05.160 me a fact
00:43:05.780 check on
00:43:06.120 this?
00:43:06.340 Did he
00:43:06.580 come out
00:43:07.440 against
00:43:07.940 ownership
00:43:08.920 of what
00:43:10.260 he would
00:43:10.520 call
00:43:10.760 assault
00:43:11.220 rifles,
00:43:11.860 or some
00:43:12.340 people would
00:43:12.740 call
00:43:12.900 assault
00:43:13.200 rifles,
00:43:13.680 the ARs?
00:43:14.860 Did he
00:43:15.480 come out
00:43:15.820 against
00:43:16.380 those?
00:43:17.180 So if
00:43:17.880 he came
00:43:18.200 out against
00:43:18.800 the ARs,
00:43:20.780 gun
00:43:21.300 ownership,
00:43:22.640 he's not
00:43:23.260 anti-Second
00:43:24.080 Amendment,
00:43:24.600 but that
00:43:25.660 would be a
00:43:26.080 red line.
00:43:29.120 He gave
00:43:29.880 away everything
00:43:30.680 he had.
00:43:31.860 He gave
00:43:32.220 away all
00:43:32.700 of it.
00:43:33.760 Now,
00:43:34.100 on one
00:43:34.420 hand,
00:43:36.220 I kind
00:43:36.720 of respect
00:43:37.240 that he's
00:43:38.400 willing to
00:43:38.820 do that.
00:43:40.020 I kind
00:43:40.380 of respect
00:43:40.800 it.
00:43:41.860 But I
00:43:42.760 feel like
00:43:43.400 any effort
00:43:45.640 to bring
00:43:46.060 us together
00:43:46.600 is now
00:43:47.020 gone.
00:43:48.440 So I
00:43:48.900 think he
00:43:49.180 traded that
00:43:49.680 away.
00:43:50.800 And I
00:43:51.100 don't know
00:43:51.340 what he
00:43:51.540 got for
00:43:51.940 it.
00:43:52.760 Now,
00:43:53.180 maybe he
00:43:54.040 thought he
00:43:54.320 would get
00:43:54.600 some
00:43:54.960 Democrat
00:43:55.880 credibility,
00:43:57.160 because he's
00:43:57.840 running as
00:43:58.260 a Democrat.
00:43:59.720 And let
00:44:00.380 me give
00:44:01.300 him this
00:44:01.680 much
00:44:01.920 defense.
00:44:03.360 If you're
00:44:04.000 running as a
00:44:05.180 Democrat,
00:44:05.600 you can't
00:44:05.900 be against
00:44:06.320 affirmative
00:44:06.720 action,
00:44:07.720 and you
00:44:08.060 can't be
00:44:08.380 in favor
00:44:08.840 of ARs.
00:44:12.660 So he's
00:44:13.800 probably just,
00:44:15.660 he may
00:44:16.220 actually believe
00:44:16.820 these things
00:44:17.380 as well.
00:44:18.220 I haven't seen
00:44:19.660 no indication
00:44:20.220 he's a liar.
00:44:20.820 there.
00:44:21.880 But it
00:44:25.080 just turned
00:44:26.000 him into,
00:44:26.620 as Mike
00:44:27.140 Cernovich
00:44:27.500 said,
00:44:27.960 a typical
00:44:28.620 shitlib.
00:44:32.300 Cernovich
00:44:32.660 was reminding
00:44:33.520 us that he's
00:44:34.040 been saying
00:44:34.420 this for a
00:44:34.880 while,
00:44:35.440 that he's
00:44:35.900 not special,
00:44:37.020 and that the
00:44:37.640 right was
00:44:38.340 getting enamored
00:44:39.040 by him,
00:44:39.880 but he's
00:44:40.560 not special.
00:44:41.520 In the end,
00:44:42.160 he's just
00:44:42.580 run-of-the-mill,
00:44:44.500 take-your-guns,
00:44:45.460 and discriminated
00:44:46.940 against white
00:44:47.460 people kind
00:44:48.000 of the guy.
00:44:50.180 I'm exaggerating
00:44:51.100 that.
00:44:51.360 That's not
00:44:51.680 what either
00:44:52.000 of them said.
00:44:54.060 So,
00:44:54.860 it'll be
00:44:56.460 fun to watch.
00:44:57.860 And I did
00:44:58.460 a little bit
00:44:59.020 of thinking,
00:45:01.640 how in the
00:45:02.240 world,
00:45:02.760 there's nothing
00:45:03.180 we can,
00:45:03.760 there's no way
00:45:04.400 to help RFK
00:45:05.120 Jr.
00:45:05.480 on guns.
00:45:06.240 Would you
00:45:06.580 agree?
00:45:07.640 There's no
00:45:08.220 argument he
00:45:08.820 can make.
00:45:10.420 It's just
00:45:10.980 sort of over.
00:45:12.640 Anybody who
00:45:13.320 wants Second
00:45:14.060 Amendment's not
00:45:14.780 going to vote
00:45:15.100 for him.
00:45:15.820 He's just
00:45:16.420 given that
00:45:16.840 away completely.
00:45:18.500 But,
00:45:19.400 yeah,
00:45:20.040 and what it
00:45:21.100 does is make
00:45:21.740 Vivek look
00:45:24.220 better every
00:45:24.740 day.
00:45:27.100 Because Vivek
00:45:28.100 is pretty
00:45:28.800 pure in
00:45:29.640 terms of
00:45:30.180 his opinions.
00:45:31.300 They match
00:45:31.940 the right
00:45:32.300 pretty well.
00:45:33.220 But then,
00:45:33.720 on top of
00:45:34.160 that,
00:45:34.900 he's the
00:45:35.320 smartest guy
00:45:35.880 in the game.
00:45:37.180 So,
00:45:37.520 the smartest
00:45:37.900 guy in the
00:45:38.360 game,
00:45:38.800 with the
00:45:39.020 best communication
00:45:40.440 skills,
00:45:41.180 which is
00:45:41.440 crazy,
00:45:42.940 he can
00:45:43.680 sell a
00:45:45.500 version that
00:45:46.140 conservatives like
00:45:47.100 and sell it
00:45:47.700 better than
00:45:48.140 they even
00:45:48.460 think it.
00:45:49.520 You know,
00:45:49.760 this is what I
00:45:50.280 say about a
00:45:50.820 good writer.
00:45:52.200 A good writer
00:45:53.180 tells you what
00:45:54.000 you were already
00:45:54.640 thinking,
00:45:55.780 but writes it
00:45:56.540 better than you
00:45:57.060 thought it.
00:45:58.820 You ever heard me
00:45:59.420 say that?
00:46:00.740 Because what you
00:46:01.480 want is not
00:46:02.040 somebody to change
00:46:02.800 your mind.
00:46:03.800 You want somebody
00:46:04.580 who says exactly
00:46:05.520 what you're
00:46:05.920 thinking,
00:46:06.380 but the way
00:46:06.720 they say it
00:46:07.260 is,
00:46:07.540 wow,
00:46:07.740 that's better
00:46:08.140 than I was
00:46:08.540 thinking it.
00:46:09.360 I could not
00:46:10.000 have explained it
00:46:10.620 as well as that
00:46:11.280 guy did.
00:46:11.720 And that's what
00:46:12.120 Vivek does,
00:46:13.140 consistently.
00:46:13.740 He can bring
00:46:15.380 the argument,
00:46:16.980 nail it down,
00:46:18.960 you know,
00:46:19.300 and just nail
00:46:20.360 every thing.
00:46:22.260 He leaves
00:46:22.860 nothing.
00:46:23.800 He doesn't
00:46:24.440 leave any
00:46:25.040 loose edges.
00:46:26.120 Like,
00:46:26.400 you can't
00:46:26.720 pull on the
00:46:27.140 thread and
00:46:28.220 get his
00:46:28.660 argument.
00:46:29.600 There's no
00:46:30.000 thread.
00:46:31.060 He locks it
00:46:31.840 up,
00:46:32.900 and it's
00:46:33.820 probably the
00:46:34.340 best you're
00:46:35.820 going to
00:46:36.000 see.
00:46:38.860 Joe Schmoe
00:46:39.900 says,
00:46:40.300 still brown
00:46:41.000 though.
00:46:41.300 I can't
00:46:43.560 tell if
00:46:43.880 you're
00:46:44.040 serious.
00:46:45.760 Are you
00:46:46.380 serious?
00:46:48.620 I just
00:46:49.180 don't,
00:46:49.480 I can't
00:46:49.860 tell.
00:46:50.500 In 2023,
00:46:51.460 you really
00:46:51.920 can't tell.
00:46:53.060 The trolls
00:46:53.800 and the
00:46:54.560 parody from
00:46:55.280 the reality,
00:46:56.420 I just
00:46:57.080 can't
00:46:57.400 tell.
00:47:01.700 I don't
00:47:02.420 know.
00:47:03.980 So,
00:47:05.580 what else
00:47:07.340 is going
00:47:07.640 on?
00:47:07.840 I almost
00:47:12.120 don't want
00:47:12.420 to bring
00:47:12.660 this up
00:47:13.140 because it's
00:47:13.680 too fun,
00:47:15.660 but I'm
00:47:15.880 going to
00:47:16.040 do it
00:47:16.280 anyway.
00:47:17.300 I've
00:47:17.740 mentioned
00:47:18.060 this
00:47:19.220 influencer
00:47:20.000 before,
00:47:21.660 H.
00:47:22.100 Pearl
00:47:22.380 Davis.
00:47:23.560 So,
00:47:23.880 I think
00:47:24.080 she goes
00:47:24.420 by Pearl.
00:47:25.880 And she
00:47:26.680 did another
00:47:27.560 whiteboard
00:47:28.220 video,
00:47:29.920 which he
00:47:32.080 suggested that
00:47:32.900 women should
00:47:33.440 not have the
00:47:33.920 right to
00:47:34.280 vote.
00:47:34.680 and they
00:47:36.880 should
00:47:37.060 repeal the
00:47:37.620 nice
00:47:37.880 to the
00:47:38.280 men that
00:47:38.680 now I
00:47:43.040 tweeted it
00:47:43.740 or you
00:47:44.380 could just
00:47:44.720 go look
00:47:45.080 for it on
00:47:45.520 Twitter.
00:47:45.940 Just look
00:47:46.440 for Pearl
00:47:47.060 Davis.
00:47:47.600 It'll
00:47:47.720 probably
00:47:47.980 pop right
00:47:48.460 up.
00:47:49.420 Now,
00:47:50.340 I've been
00:47:51.160 following her
00:47:51.740 content mostly
00:47:52.580 on Instagram
00:47:53.100 for a while
00:47:53.760 and it is
00:47:54.780 endlessly
00:47:55.340 entertaining.
00:47:56.940 I want to
00:47:57.560 say clearly
00:47:58.180 that I don't
00:47:59.600 agree with
00:48:00.320 her views.
00:48:02.260 I want you
00:48:03.040 to hear that
00:48:03.460 clearly.
00:48:03.820 so we're
00:48:04.760 not here
00:48:05.500 to argue
00:48:05.920 whether she's
00:48:06.520 right or
00:48:06.840 wrong.
00:48:07.400 I'm not
00:48:07.860 going to
00:48:07.980 have that
00:48:08.280 argument.
00:48:09.180 I'm saying
00:48:09.660 that watching
00:48:10.940 her navigate
00:48:13.100 that sharp
00:48:14.300 edge between
00:48:15.820 going too
00:48:16.580 far or
00:48:18.480 being a
00:48:18.860 parody or
00:48:20.720 being serious
00:48:21.500 is really
00:48:23.360 hard to
00:48:23.840 tell.
00:48:24.720 And because
00:48:25.880 it's hard to
00:48:26.480 tell, it's
00:48:26.780 brilliant because
00:48:27.960 you can't look
00:48:28.480 away.
00:48:29.200 You're not
00:48:29.640 sure what
00:48:30.040 you're seeing.
00:48:32.140 You're
00:48:32.620 wondering if
00:48:33.140 at the end
00:48:33.540 she's going
00:48:33.900 to say
00:48:34.080 just
00:48:34.360 kidding and
00:48:35.720 walk it
00:48:36.320 back.
00:48:37.140 But she
00:48:37.580 doesn't.
00:48:39.200 And then
00:48:39.940 you think,
00:48:40.340 well, she's
00:48:40.660 never going
00:48:41.020 to be able
00:48:41.300 to make
00:48:41.580 this argument.
00:48:42.960 Now, again,
00:48:43.840 I'll remind
00:48:44.360 you, I do
00:48:45.440 think women
00:48:46.000 should be
00:48:46.440 voting.
00:48:48.320 But when
00:48:48.920 you listen to
00:48:49.560 her argument
00:48:50.080 and the fact
00:48:50.720 that it comes
00:48:51.160 from a woman,
00:48:51.900 which makes
00:48:52.380 it funnier,
00:48:53.480 her argument
00:48:54.180 is suspiciously
00:48:56.000 good.
00:48:57.860 It doesn't
00:48:58.920 sell me.
00:48:59.420 it's like
00:49:00.980 right up to
00:49:01.600 the edge of
00:49:02.100 something that
00:49:02.520 would make
00:49:02.840 sense.
00:49:03.600 It's like
00:49:03.980 so close.
00:49:05.440 It's so
00:49:06.080 close to
00:49:07.460 something that
00:49:07.960 does make
00:49:08.400 sense that
00:49:09.460 your brain
00:49:10.100 gets a
00:49:11.280 little turgid
00:49:13.080 just trying to
00:49:13.660 figure it out.
00:49:15.220 Is that real?
00:49:16.360 Is that real or
00:49:17.060 is she just
00:49:17.380 kidding?
00:49:17.760 I can't tell.
00:49:18.960 And so I
00:49:19.820 highly recommend
00:49:20.660 her content,
00:49:21.820 but I'll say
00:49:23.020 a hundred times,
00:49:24.560 don't assume I'm
00:49:25.400 agreeing with her
00:49:26.040 content.
00:49:26.380 It's just
00:49:27.180 brilliant content
00:49:28.060 because it
00:49:29.180 makes you think.
00:49:31.560 And I'll give
00:49:32.080 you my own
00:49:34.300 summary of it,
00:49:35.080 which I think
00:49:35.500 is unfair,
00:49:36.600 because the
00:49:37.240 details that she
00:49:38.040 puts into it
00:49:38.820 of her argument
00:49:39.880 are all
00:49:40.360 hilarious.
00:49:41.920 They're just
00:49:42.300 because you
00:49:43.180 keep thinking
00:49:43.700 it makes sense,
00:49:44.500 but not exactly.
00:49:45.940 That's what
00:49:46.440 makes humor
00:49:46.920 work.
00:49:49.960 But I would
00:49:50.900 summarize her
00:49:52.060 entire thing,
00:49:54.680 and she would
00:49:55.320 not summarize it
00:49:56.080 this way,
00:49:56.520 this is just
00:49:56.920 my summarization,
00:49:58.640 as the
00:49:59.460 problem is
00:49:59.980 that men
00:50:01.100 can't say
00:50:01.540 no to women.
00:50:04.000 And there
00:50:04.560 are a lot
00:50:04.840 of women
00:50:05.180 voting for
00:50:05.800 stuff,
00:50:06.620 and a lot
00:50:06.940 of men
00:50:07.280 saying,
00:50:07.840 all right,
00:50:08.240 that's what
00:50:08.620 you want.
00:50:09.600 But if you
00:50:10.280 took women
00:50:10.800 out of the
00:50:11.180 mix from
00:50:12.360 voting,
00:50:13.320 and men
00:50:13.820 voted for
00:50:14.500 what they
00:50:15.100 thought was
00:50:15.540 a good idea,
00:50:16.640 you'd get a
00:50:17.280 different outcome.
00:50:20.220 Maybe.
00:50:21.500 You know,
00:50:21.960 my observation
00:50:22.900 is men and
00:50:23.500 women seem
00:50:23.940 to vote about
00:50:24.460 the same.
00:50:24.860 I mean,
00:50:25.880 the polls
00:50:26.520 say otherwise,
00:50:27.420 but yeah,
00:50:30.440 actually,
00:50:31.280 no,
00:50:31.600 I take that
00:50:32.040 back.
00:50:32.280 They don't
00:50:32.560 vote about
00:50:32.920 the same
00:50:33.280 anymore.
00:50:33.920 They used
00:50:34.280 to,
00:50:34.500 right?
00:50:35.880 I think
00:50:36.420 I'm out of
00:50:36.800 date.
00:50:37.420 They used
00:50:37.920 to vote
00:50:38.220 similar,
00:50:39.140 but now
00:50:39.660 women are
00:50:40.180 more likely
00:50:40.600 to be
00:50:40.880 Democrat.
00:50:41.980 Is that
00:50:42.400 true?
00:50:42.580 So it
00:50:44.740 would be
00:50:45.000 women who
00:50:46.200 would be
00:50:46.480 more likely
00:50:47.060 to be
00:50:47.440 pushing,
00:50:48.160 let's
00:50:48.720 say,
00:50:49.620 affirmative
00:50:50.040 action.
00:50:53.000 If you
00:50:53.540 did a
00:50:53.840 poll of
00:50:54.540 men versus
00:50:55.540 women on
00:50:56.220 affirmative
00:50:56.620 action,
00:50:57.140 would it
00:50:57.320 come out
00:50:57.580 the same?
00:51:01.800 I think
00:51:02.420 more women
00:51:02.920 would be in
00:51:03.360 favor of it,
00:51:03.920 but I'm
00:51:04.120 not positive.
00:51:06.260 Yeah.
00:51:06.600 So there
00:51:07.000 are some
00:51:07.360 things that
00:51:08.120 are different
00:51:08.800 because women
00:51:10.060 are voters.
00:51:12.420 And then
00:51:12.780 Pearl's
00:51:14.220 serious or
00:51:15.940 not serious,
00:51:16.640 I can't
00:51:16.980 tell,
00:51:17.580 opinion is
00:51:18.320 that that
00:51:18.640 changes
00:51:18.960 things and
00:51:19.440 it might
00:51:19.660 be a bad
00:51:20.060 way.
00:51:21.020 I don't
00:51:21.220 know.
00:51:22.600 The reason
00:51:23.480 I disagree
00:51:24.040 with her
00:51:24.480 is not
00:51:26.260 in her
00:51:26.760 argument that
00:51:27.840 things worked
00:51:28.500 out poorly,
00:51:30.420 because she
00:51:30.800 makes a pretty
00:51:31.280 good argument
00:51:31.780 that things
00:51:32.240 worked out
00:51:32.680 poorly.
00:51:33.800 It's just
00:51:34.400 that you
00:51:34.680 can't have
00:51:36.500 full citizens
00:51:37.580 of the United
00:51:38.140 States who
00:51:38.700 can't vote.
00:51:40.100 It's just
00:51:40.400 there's no
00:51:41.180 way to get
00:51:41.540 there.
00:51:42.000 So it's
00:51:42.240 sort of a
00:51:42.640 funny point,
00:51:44.280 not really
00:51:45.300 a serious
00:51:45.900 plan.
00:51:51.420 That was
00:51:52.020 the most
00:51:52.340 sexist
00:51:52.980 comment I've
00:51:53.680 ever seen
00:51:54.100 there on
00:51:54.560 YouTube.
00:51:56.460 I was
00:51:57.020 going to
00:51:57.220 read it
00:51:57.460 because it's
00:51:57.760 funny,
00:51:58.180 but it
00:51:59.020 might be
00:51:59.280 a little
00:52:00.300 over the
00:52:00.660 line.
00:52:04.360 Switzerland
00:52:04.840 regrets
00:52:05.480 allowing it.
00:52:07.540 All right.
00:52:08.700 Let's
00:52:11.100 talk about
00:52:11.600 Purgosian.
00:52:14.380 I might
00:52:15.940 end up
00:52:16.380 being wrong
00:52:16.980 about this.
00:52:18.540 I might.
00:52:19.640 So I've
00:52:20.180 said that
00:52:20.520 you'll never
00:52:20.880 see him
00:52:21.240 again,
00:52:21.940 and that
00:52:22.620 when his
00:52:23.000 airplane flew
00:52:23.760 to Belarus,
00:52:24.300 it was just
00:52:25.580 the airplane,
00:52:27.120 and that
00:52:27.420 you'll never
00:52:27.840 see him
00:52:28.200 again.
00:52:29.020 And the
00:52:29.380 reason you'll
00:52:29.820 never see
00:52:30.160 him again
00:52:30.480 is that
00:52:30.840 Putin needs
00:52:31.540 to know
00:52:32.060 he's found
00:52:33.180 all the
00:52:33.560 traitors.
00:52:33.980 and the
00:52:34.960 only way
00:52:35.500 to know
00:52:35.880 it is
00:52:36.800 to get
00:52:37.120 it from
00:52:37.600 Purgosian,
00:52:38.580 because he's
00:52:38.980 the only
00:52:39.320 one who
00:52:40.480 would know
00:52:40.820 everybody he's
00:52:41.540 talked to
00:52:42.040 and what
00:52:42.660 agreements they
00:52:43.300 made,
00:52:43.640 etc.
00:52:43.800 So there's
00:52:45.060 a 100%
00:52:45.660 chance,
00:52:46.540 in my
00:52:46.800 opinion,
00:52:47.900 that Putin
00:52:48.460 got a hold
00:52:49.100 of him
00:52:49.420 and he's
00:52:51.360 being
00:52:51.580 interrogated.
00:52:53.280 And when I
00:52:54.120 say interrogated,
00:52:55.540 I mean he's
00:52:56.300 having a bad
00:52:56.880 day.
00:52:58.620 So today
00:53:00.160 there were
00:53:00.560 pictures of him
00:53:01.340 in St.
00:53:01.760 Petersburg.
00:53:04.180 Oh,
00:53:04.820 okay,
00:53:05.320 well I guess
00:53:05.680 I was wrong.
00:53:07.080 There are
00:53:07.360 pictures of him
00:53:07.980 getting in a
00:53:08.400 helicopter and
00:53:09.080 there are new
00:53:09.420 pictures.
00:53:10.540 And he's there
00:53:11.340 with his
00:53:11.660 bodyguard and
00:53:12.620 there's no doubt
00:53:14.340 about it.
00:53:14.840 He was cleaning
00:53:15.680 out his stuff
00:53:16.260 in St.
00:53:16.680 Petersburg,
00:53:17.280 getting on a
00:53:17.680 helicopter.
00:53:19.520 And then
00:53:20.020 somebody did
00:53:21.000 a close-up
00:53:21.720 of his hand.
00:53:24.060 And he's
00:53:24.720 got five
00:53:25.180 fingers on
00:53:25.720 his hand.
00:53:27.300 The real
00:53:27.860 Purgosian
00:53:28.580 does not.
00:53:30.240 So the
00:53:30.820 guy that
00:53:31.260 everybody
00:53:31.560 thought it
00:53:31.980 was Purgosian
00:53:32.440 was wearing
00:53:32.960 a COVID
00:53:34.680 mask and
00:53:36.460 he was with
00:53:36.960 his real
00:53:37.380 bodyguard and
00:53:39.520 they were
00:53:39.900 allowed to be
00:53:40.980 photographed.
00:53:41.620 Oh,
00:53:41.880 what a
00:53:42.160 coincidence.
00:53:43.120 How
00:53:43.480 interesting.
00:53:45.280 There just
00:53:45.740 happened to
00:53:46.080 be a
00:53:46.280 photographer
00:53:46.660 there.
00:53:47.980 Just
00:53:48.240 happened to
00:53:48.560 get the
00:53:48.800 picture of
00:53:49.800 Purgosian
00:53:50.780 getting on
00:53:51.660 a helicopter
00:53:52.160 in St.
00:53:52.620 Petersburg.
00:53:53.620 So I
00:53:53.880 guess he's
00:53:55.140 not only
00:53:55.600 free,
00:53:56.800 but he's
00:53:57.440 helicoptering
00:53:58.120 around with
00:53:58.820 his bodyguard,
00:54:00.180 no Russians
00:54:00.960 watching him.
00:54:02.040 He's just
00:54:02.480 sort of
00:54:02.820 doing his
00:54:03.320 thing and
00:54:03.700 then totally
00:54:04.760 voluntarily he
00:54:06.480 will go back
00:54:07.880 to Belarus,
00:54:09.340 of course,
00:54:10.240 where he'll
00:54:10.720 live a happy
00:54:11.280 life on the
00:54:11.800 farm with
00:54:12.320 your dead
00:54:12.680 dog.
00:54:14.300 So then
00:54:17.260 they showed
00:54:17.580 the picture of
00:54:18.120 the real
00:54:18.400 Purgosian.
00:54:19.380 He's got
00:54:19.700 one,
00:54:20.920 part of one
00:54:21.520 finger is
00:54:21.980 missing,
00:54:22.700 but the guy
00:54:23.600 who got in
00:54:24.020 the helicopter,
00:54:25.060 who is with
00:54:26.040 his actual
00:54:26.480 bodyguard,
00:54:26.960 because the
00:54:27.320 bodyguard
00:54:27.720 didn't have
00:54:28.100 a mask
00:54:28.500 on.
00:54:29.440 So you
00:54:29.760 could tell
00:54:30.060 the bodyguard
00:54:30.600 was definitely
00:54:31.120 the bodyguard,
00:54:32.640 but it was
00:54:33.600 a body
00:54:33.920 double.
00:54:35.920 It was a
00:54:36.620 body double.
00:54:39.180 Do you
00:54:39.420 still believe
00:54:39.880 there was an
00:54:40.300 insurrection?
00:54:41.720 Yes.
00:54:43.120 I believe it
00:54:44.040 was a
00:54:44.740 conditional
00:54:47.500 insurrection.
00:54:48.360 It was a
00:54:50.740 conditional
00:54:51.340 insurrection,
00:54:52.940 meaning that
00:54:53.700 I don't
00:54:54.860 know that
00:54:55.400 Purgosian
00:54:55.920 knew what
00:54:56.720 was possible
00:54:57.540 to happen.
00:54:58.820 I think that
00:54:59.460 at a minimum
00:54:59.960 he wanted to
00:55:00.620 get rid of
00:55:01.180 those generals.
00:55:04.740 But I do
00:55:05.840 think there's
00:55:06.580 no chance he
00:55:07.260 wasn't thinking
00:55:07.900 in his mind
00:55:08.600 that if he
00:55:09.800 got rid of
00:55:10.280 the generals,
00:55:10.940 or actually
00:55:11.420 he said
00:55:11.740 capture them,
00:55:12.920 it looked like
00:55:14.020 he was trying
00:55:14.500 to take over
00:55:15.120 the military.
00:55:17.160 So I believe
00:55:17.780 that when
00:55:18.320 Purgosian
00:55:19.040 says,
00:55:19.460 no,
00:55:19.840 I love
00:55:20.280 Putin,
00:55:20.740 I'm never,
00:55:21.480 you think
00:55:22.440 this is a
00:55:23.300 coup against
00:55:24.000 Putin?
00:55:24.820 Are you
00:55:25.240 kidding me?
00:55:25.760 No,
00:55:26.680 no,
00:55:27.400 no.
00:55:27.960 No,
00:55:28.280 I'm only
00:55:28.720 mad at
00:55:29.060 the military.
00:55:30.320 So I'm
00:55:30.740 going to
00:55:30.900 try to
00:55:31.160 take over
00:55:31.600 the head
00:55:32.060 of the
00:55:32.340 military
00:55:32.780 and replace
00:55:34.140 the head
00:55:34.460 of the
00:55:34.680 military
00:55:34.980 with myself
00:55:35.960 or one
00:55:37.100 of my
00:55:37.360 puppets.
00:55:38.100 So I
00:55:38.760 don't want
00:55:39.140 to take
00:55:39.400 over the
00:55:39.660 country.
00:55:40.560 That's
00:55:40.960 crazy.
00:55:41.500 I'm only
00:55:42.000 trying to
00:55:42.340 take over
00:55:42.740 the entire
00:55:43.360 military
00:55:44.220 complex.
00:55:46.620 And then,
00:55:47.020 of course,
00:55:47.740 once I
00:55:48.280 owned all
00:55:48.960 of the
00:55:49.240 military,
00:55:50.520 I would,
00:55:51.120 because I
00:55:51.460 like Putin,
00:55:51.960 I would let
00:55:52.320 him run
00:55:52.600 the country.
00:55:53.900 Of course.
00:55:55.080 Of course
00:55:55.640 Putin can
00:55:56.100 run the
00:55:56.440 country.
00:55:57.040 I just
00:55:57.440 want to
00:55:57.700 own all
00:55:58.520 the guns.
00:56:01.260 Do you
00:56:01.780 think he
00:56:02.080 was going
00:56:02.320 to take
00:56:02.600 over the
00:56:02.940 military and
00:56:04.100 then let
00:56:04.480 Putin run
00:56:05.000 the country?
00:56:06.080 Do you
00:56:06.560 think that
00:56:06.980 was his
00:56:07.360 plan?
00:56:07.660 I don't
00:56:11.480 think so.
00:56:12.000 If it
00:56:12.860 was, it
00:56:13.200 was the
00:56:13.440 worst
00:56:13.620 plan I've
00:56:14.120 ever heard.
00:56:16.040 At the
00:56:16.600 very least,
00:56:17.720 he was
00:56:17.980 trying to
00:56:18.360 control the
00:56:18.900 military.
00:56:19.840 If you
00:56:20.200 control the
00:56:20.800 military,
00:56:22.140 well, you
00:56:23.500 kind of
00:56:24.020 control the
00:56:24.560 country.
00:56:26.480 And by the
00:56:27.120 way, has
00:56:27.780 anybody said
00:56:28.500 that?
00:56:29.640 I keep
00:56:30.020 watching the
00:56:30.560 news for
00:56:30.980 somebody, I
00:56:31.580 keep waiting
00:56:31.940 for somebody
00:56:32.300 to say,
00:56:32.900 well, you
00:56:33.500 know, whether
00:56:33.820 it was a
00:56:34.160 coup or not
00:56:34.620 a coup, he
00:56:35.020 was trying to
00:56:35.460 control the
00:56:35.940 military.
00:56:36.720 If you
00:56:37.100 control the
00:56:37.520 military, you
00:56:38.040 effectively
00:56:38.440 control the
00:56:39.040 country.
00:56:41.440 I'm the
00:56:42.000 first person
00:56:42.500 to say that
00:56:42.960 out loud,
00:56:43.500 aren't I?
00:56:44.240 Which is
00:56:44.820 weird, because
00:56:45.260 it's the
00:56:45.520 most obvious
00:56:46.100 explanation of
00:56:47.760 what was
00:56:48.040 happening.
00:56:49.700 All right.
00:56:52.520 Here's my
00:56:53.120 real question.
00:56:53.860 Much like
00:56:54.300 CNN and
00:56:54.940 MSNBC after
00:56:56.200 the affirmative
00:56:56.660 action decision,
00:56:58.540 Putin really,
00:56:59.980 really doesn't
00:57:00.600 know who to
00:57:01.000 trust.
00:57:02.380 And the
00:57:03.140 magnitude of
00:57:03.840 that problem
00:57:04.440 now,
00:57:05.460 is hard
00:57:06.240 to predict.
00:57:09.780 But there
00:57:10.480 are people
00:57:10.840 who, you
00:57:11.300 know, since
00:57:11.780 the beginning
00:57:12.260 of the
00:57:12.780 Prugosian
00:57:13.440 thing, have
00:57:13.840 said, oh,
00:57:14.280 it's the
00:57:14.500 end of
00:57:14.900 Russia.
00:57:16.620 Now, I
00:57:17.520 didn't think
00:57:17.880 so.
00:57:18.520 I didn't
00:57:18.740 think it
00:57:18.920 was the
00:57:19.160 end of
00:57:19.420 Russia.
00:57:20.240 But who
00:57:23.440 knows how
00:57:23.940 bad it
00:57:24.300 could be?
00:57:26.220 Because don't
00:57:26.840 you think
00:57:27.320 that by
00:57:28.500 now, Putin
00:57:29.800 is probably
00:57:30.740 jailing or
00:57:32.560 killing people
00:57:33.360 who are
00:57:33.920 largely innocent?
00:57:35.460 Don't
00:57:36.780 you think
00:57:37.060 that's
00:57:37.320 happened?
00:57:38.240 Because he's
00:57:38.800 probably dealing
00:57:39.460 with a bunch
00:57:40.060 of people.
00:57:41.180 And if
00:57:41.500 you're a
00:57:41.860 dictator, you
00:57:42.640 take, you
00:57:43.280 know, you
00:57:43.560 jail or you
00:57:44.280 kill all the
00:57:44.980 people you're
00:57:45.500 sure were part
00:57:46.320 of the coup.
00:57:48.300 But also, and
00:57:49.660 here's the
00:57:50.000 important part,
00:57:51.400 also anybody
00:57:52.160 who knew
00:57:52.600 those people,
00:57:53.680 anybody who
00:57:55.620 was a good
00:57:56.000 friend with a
00:57:56.880 coup plotter,
00:57:58.240 probably dead
00:57:59.400 or in
00:58:00.240 jail.
00:58:00.440 people.
00:58:01.120 So the
00:58:02.860 problem is
00:58:03.420 not the
00:58:03.760 ones you
00:58:04.100 know are
00:58:04.780 the coup
00:58:05.220 plotters,
00:58:06.260 the problem
00:58:06.880 is how
00:58:07.300 much of
00:58:08.460 the cancer
00:58:09.080 you have
00:58:09.420 to cut
00:58:09.780 out by
00:58:10.800 getting rid
00:58:11.300 of people
00:58:11.640 who really
00:58:12.200 had nothing
00:58:12.580 to do with
00:58:13.040 anything.
00:58:13.500 They just
00:58:13.840 happen to
00:58:14.420 know the
00:58:14.720 guy.
00:58:16.360 And those
00:58:17.060 people are
00:58:18.220 going to
00:58:18.460 become now
00:58:19.440 radicalized as
00:58:20.700 are all their
00:58:21.220 relatives and
00:58:21.920 friends because
00:58:23.080 they're going to
00:58:23.380 say, all right,
00:58:24.120 you just got rid
00:58:24.780 of a hundred
00:58:25.200 people that
00:58:25.760 had nothing to
00:58:26.360 do with
00:58:26.600 anything.
00:58:26.900 And we
00:58:28.480 have all the
00:58:28.960 guns.
00:58:30.340 How long do
00:58:31.160 you put up
00:58:31.540 with it?
00:58:32.840 How long does
00:58:33.480 the military put
00:58:34.240 up with the
00:58:35.420 military being
00:58:36.160 abused by a
00:58:36.880 civilian?
00:58:37.860 Putin.
00:58:38.900 I don't know.
00:58:39.980 Could get
00:58:40.320 dicey.
00:58:41.540 Could get
00:58:41.940 dicey.
00:58:42.680 It also means
00:58:43.460 that Putin
00:58:43.860 probably can't
00:58:44.520 go out in
00:58:44.880 public very
00:58:45.460 much unless
00:58:46.320 it's a really
00:58:47.100 controlled
00:58:47.620 situation for
00:58:49.020 now.
00:58:49.700 Because he
00:58:49.940 probably thinks
00:58:50.540 there, let
00:58:52.400 me say it
00:58:54.040 directly, there's
00:58:55.300 no way that
00:58:56.140 Purgosian
00:58:56.600 doesn't have
00:58:57.240 an assassination
00:58:58.560 squad looking
00:59:00.560 to kill
00:59:00.980 Putin.
00:59:01.920 Would you
00:59:02.260 agree?
00:59:03.540 No matter
00:59:04.320 whether Purgosian
00:59:05.200 is alive or
00:59:06.000 dead, there's
00:59:07.580 somebody he's
00:59:08.360 already operating,
00:59:09.360 you know, he's
00:59:09.860 probably paid or
00:59:11.600 something, who's
00:59:12.700 looking to put
00:59:13.420 the decapitation
00:59:14.440 strike on
00:59:15.040 Putin.
00:59:15.840 So I feel like
00:59:16.840 there could be
00:59:17.340 another play here.
00:59:18.760 I mean, don't be
00:59:19.720 surprised if
00:59:20.500 something blows
00:59:21.240 up near Putin,
00:59:23.020 like really
00:59:24.360 soon.
00:59:25.280 Now remember,
00:59:25.740 the Wagner
00:59:26.680 group has
00:59:27.160 military assets.
00:59:29.900 In theory, they
00:59:31.760 could drop a
00:59:32.580 loitering munition
00:59:33.620 right on top of
00:59:34.660 Putin if they
00:59:35.220 knew where he
00:59:35.600 was.
00:59:37.140 Now, presumably
00:59:38.160 Putin always
00:59:38.840 travels with,
00:59:39.660 you know, even, I
00:59:40.760 imagine, even
00:59:41.360 anti-aircraft.
00:59:43.860 If Putin is just
00:59:45.000 driving from one
00:59:45.840 part of the city to
00:59:46.600 another, he's
00:59:48.220 probably got all
00:59:48.760 kinds of military
00:59:49.500 assets, you know,
00:59:50.840 the whole way, at
00:59:51.920 least now.
00:59:52.300 But would they
00:59:53.240 be able to
00:59:53.700 shoot things out
00:59:54.460 of the air?
00:59:55.620 If he's driving
00:59:56.500 down a city
00:59:57.160 street in
00:59:57.640 Moscow and a
00:59:59.480 loitering munition
01:00:00.420 appears from
01:00:01.280 over top of a
01:00:02.460 building, like it
01:00:03.360 was invisible until
01:00:04.300 it came over the
01:00:04.920 street, looks down,
01:00:07.180 has, let's say,
01:00:08.180 15 seconds to
01:00:09.440 lock on and drop
01:00:10.520 the munitions.
01:00:11.880 In 15 seconds,
01:00:14.120 can his defensive
01:00:15.300 people knock that
01:00:16.380 down?
01:00:16.600 Would there be
01:00:19.920 helicopters above
01:00:21.240 any Putin movement
01:00:23.520 so they could get
01:00:24.920 anything in the air?
01:00:26.200 I don't know.
01:00:26.780 I just don't think
01:00:27.480 the anti-drone
01:00:30.880 technology is so
01:00:32.380 good that they
01:00:33.600 could get them
01:00:34.140 all.
01:00:35.900 Yeah.
01:00:36.500 I mean,
01:00:36.760 Soleimani got
01:00:37.520 whacked and he
01:00:38.400 was obviously
01:00:38.920 looking for
01:00:39.480 trouble.
01:00:40.320 I mean, he was
01:00:40.820 looking for
01:00:41.520 potential attacks.
01:00:45.780 All right.
01:00:46.600 So, Wall Street
01:00:52.360 Journal is
01:00:53.000 reporting that
01:00:53.640 China changed
01:00:54.540 their, one of
01:00:56.620 their laws about
01:00:57.700 what espionage
01:00:59.860 is.
01:01:00.780 So if you're a
01:01:01.740 foreign entity,
01:01:02.880 let's say a
01:01:03.300 company operating
01:01:04.020 in China, you
01:01:05.620 could get arrested
01:01:07.000 for espionage based
01:01:09.220 on the new vague
01:01:10.640 standards.
01:01:12.460 And so the U.S.
01:01:15.680 counterintelligence
01:01:16.500 officials are
01:01:17.840 warning that
01:01:18.720 American executives
01:01:20.660 could get arrested
01:01:21.420 over there on
01:01:23.360 charges that would
01:01:24.520 not necessarily be
01:01:27.080 related to anything
01:01:27.980 bad they did.
01:01:28.980 They would just use
01:01:30.100 the new ambiguous
01:01:31.000 law to say, well,
01:01:32.220 you're some kind of
01:01:33.760 a spy.
01:01:34.140 So, I don't know if
01:01:38.080 I've mentioned this
01:01:38.760 before, but has
01:01:40.020 anybody ever heard
01:01:40.720 me say that China
01:01:42.700 is unsafe for
01:01:43.540 business?
01:01:46.020 And it just keeps
01:01:47.000 getting more
01:01:47.580 unsafe?
01:01:48.720 I don't know how
01:01:49.860 anybody would start
01:01:50.960 business over there.
01:01:52.700 I do understand how
01:01:53.900 somebody like Elon
01:01:54.680 Musk might be a
01:01:55.680 little bit trapped.
01:01:56.780 You know, he's got to
01:01:57.300 do business there.
01:01:58.680 He doesn't have too
01:01:59.540 many options.
01:02:00.020 But why would you
01:02:01.660 open a business
01:02:02.480 there?
01:02:04.020 Like, what American
01:02:05.020 would say, I'd like
01:02:05.820 to open a business
01:02:07.260 in China and I'll be
01:02:08.420 visiting that a lot
01:02:09.340 with my laptop that
01:02:11.940 will be hacked in
01:02:12.980 10 seconds?
01:02:14.860 All right.
01:02:17.700 That, ladies and
01:02:18.660 gentlemen, is all I
01:02:21.460 had planned to talk
01:02:22.280 about because I was
01:02:24.040 having so much fun
01:02:24.880 reading about
01:02:25.400 everybody's reaction
01:02:26.260 to the news.
01:02:28.040 Was there a story
01:02:29.740 I missed?
01:02:30.840 I didn't really get
01:02:31.740 to check the news
01:02:33.300 news.
01:02:33.740 I just was looking
01:02:34.600 at the headlines.
01:02:36.780 Yeah, we talked
01:02:37.220 about Pergoshan's
01:02:38.080 body double, just
01:02:38.980 did that.
01:02:42.920 Supreme Court just
01:02:44.000 threw out Biden's
01:02:46.040 student loan debt
01:02:47.720 relief.
01:02:53.500 Good.
01:02:53.980 So, it's looking
01:02:59.220 bad for them.
01:03:01.180 Now, do you think
01:03:01.680 the Democrats will
01:03:03.180 use affirmative
01:03:04.300 action and the
01:03:06.380 turning down of the
01:03:07.640 student loan stuff as
01:03:09.360 campaign fodder?
01:03:12.420 What do you think?
01:03:13.760 You think they will
01:03:14.500 use these as campaign
01:03:16.180 fodder?
01:03:17.640 I'm going to go
01:03:18.480 contrarian.
01:03:20.200 I think they might,
01:03:21.640 so I agree with you
01:03:22.560 that they'll give it
01:03:23.640 a shot, but I don't
01:03:24.820 think that's going
01:03:25.320 to work the way
01:03:25.880 they want.
01:03:27.300 I think that if
01:03:28.480 the, let's say
01:03:30.180 if Biden, if Biden
01:03:31.720 really makes a thing
01:03:33.340 about affirmative
01:03:33.960 action, he's going
01:03:35.380 to lose a lot of
01:03:36.160 white Democrats who
01:03:37.960 have kids who are
01:03:38.760 trying to get into
01:03:39.320 college, and he's
01:03:40.220 going to lose all
01:03:40.920 of the Asian
01:03:41.380 Americans, or 80%
01:03:42.920 of them.
01:03:44.840 So, I think it's
01:03:48.120 really dangerous for
01:03:49.080 him to push that
01:03:49.720 button.
01:03:51.400 Timing isn't
01:03:51.940 right.
01:03:52.700 20 years ago, yes.
01:03:54.640 Now, not so much.
01:03:59.320 How will they do an
01:04:00.260 end run on the
01:04:00.960 court packing?
01:04:03.340 I'd think that
01:04:04.240 Biden is smart
01:04:05.060 enough not to do
01:04:05.900 it, believe it or
01:04:06.800 not.
01:04:07.680 I think he's smart
01:04:08.820 enough not to do
01:04:09.620 it.
01:04:10.820 But if they don't
01:04:11.680 do it, it's going
01:04:12.240 to be a lot of
01:04:14.240 years of Republican
01:04:15.280 victories in the
01:04:16.060 courts.
01:04:18.100 He already did.
01:04:19.700 Did what?
01:04:20.140 Oh, Biden already
01:04:21.900 used it.
01:04:22.280 Yeah, of course
01:04:22.780 Biden's already
01:04:23.580 going to use it.
01:04:24.720 But we'll see if he
01:04:26.020 stays with it.
01:04:27.280 You know, it's a
01:04:27.780 headline, so of
01:04:28.540 course he has to
01:04:29.040 address it.
01:04:29.820 But does he make it
01:04:30.800 like a key part of
01:04:32.220 his ongoing campaign?
01:04:34.200 And I think maybe
01:04:35.680 not.
01:04:36.140 I think they're going
01:04:36.700 to poll it.
01:04:37.920 Because I saw a poll
01:04:40.020 today that said that
01:04:41.020 getting rid of
01:04:42.200 affirmative action was
01:04:43.420 hugely popular in the
01:04:45.320 country.
01:04:46.340 Is that your
01:04:47.100 understanding?
01:04:47.660 Is your
01:04:49.140 understanding that
01:04:49.840 affirmative action was
01:04:51.100 not popular and that
01:04:52.560 most people, I think
01:04:53.920 two-thirds, are happy
01:04:55.300 that it went away?
01:04:57.600 Yeah.
01:04:58.280 So he'd be arguing on
01:04:59.920 the side of one-third
01:05:01.100 of the public against
01:05:02.200 two-thirds of the
01:05:03.120 public.
01:05:03.680 That's like a bad
01:05:04.880 campaign approach.
01:05:07.640 You know, he should be
01:05:08.740 picking things that at
01:05:09.660 least 100% of Democrats
01:05:11.040 like.
01:05:12.020 And there's plenty of
01:05:12.920 that.
01:05:14.760 All right.
01:05:15.420 Well, you know,
01:05:21.140 honestly, what I felt
01:05:22.000 like is that black
01:05:22.940 Americans got a
01:05:23.840 promotion yesterday.
01:05:27.040 Did anybody have that
01:05:28.060 feeling?
01:05:29.380 It felt like black
01:05:30.180 Americans got promoted
01:05:31.460 to full citizenship.
01:05:35.400 That's what it felt
01:05:36.200 like.
01:05:37.180 And what I mean by
01:05:37.960 that is, as long as
01:05:39.300 affirmative action
01:05:40.260 existed, then the
01:05:42.980 system was treating
01:05:43.860 black Americans like
01:05:46.120 second-class citizens.
01:05:48.520 That's how I saw it.
01:05:50.180 I saw them being
01:05:50.940 treated as second-class
01:05:52.220 citizens.
01:05:53.280 Like, oh, oh, you
01:05:55.320 need a little help.
01:05:56.580 Oh, poor little guy.
01:05:58.580 Yeah, you need a
01:05:59.140 little help.
01:05:59.760 I thought it was
01:06:00.280 condescending and
01:06:02.600 counterproductive the
01:06:03.680 way, the same way
01:06:04.580 Jen thinks so.
01:06:05.500 It was a good idea for
01:06:06.620 a long time, but it
01:06:07.840 became counterproductive
01:06:09.300 because it succeeded.
01:06:11.020 Its own success made it
01:06:12.820 unnecessary, and I
01:06:13.760 think it was time to
01:06:15.000 go.
01:06:17.960 But, yeah, to me,
01:06:19.900 wait five years.
01:06:21.740 In five years, if you
01:06:23.040 see a new, let's say,
01:06:27.140 young black college
01:06:29.700 graduate, maybe you
01:06:32.980 start saying to
01:06:33.680 yourself, wow, if you
01:06:35.660 could be a young black
01:06:37.420 person who came, let's
01:06:38.400 say, from a poorer
01:06:39.980 situation, and you still
01:06:41.740 made it through an Ivy
01:06:42.580 League school, I
01:06:43.960 definitely want that
01:06:45.020 person on my team.
01:06:46.960 Somebody who could
01:06:47.920 plow through every
01:06:50.120 obstacle and still make
01:06:51.940 it work without any
01:06:52.900 help, oh, yeah.
01:06:54.820 Oh, yeah.
01:06:55.400 I'm hiring that
01:06:56.140 person.
01:06:57.280 But right now, you're
01:06:58.260 thinking, all right, I
01:06:59.540 don't know, how did you
01:07:00.080 get into college?
01:07:01.380 Somebody help you?
01:07:03.080 So, to me, it looks
01:07:04.160 like a gigantic victory
01:07:06.660 for black Americans to
01:07:09.280 be, finally, no longer
01:07:12.760 considered second-class
01:07:13.880 citizens, at least in
01:07:15.560 this minor context.
01:07:19.520 So, I don't know, always
01:07:21.000 good with the bad.
01:07:23.460 Anything else?
01:07:24.640 Yeah, somebody said a
01:07:25.500 lot of the black students
01:07:28.240 in Harvard were actually
01:07:29.560 immigrants, and they had
01:07:31.040 no slavery legacy
01:07:32.660 whatsoever, although I
01:07:36.540 suppose they might have
01:07:37.180 from other countries.
01:07:40.380 All right.
01:07:42.200 And it also puts all the
01:07:43.640 pressure on the school
01:07:48.340 unions, teachers' unions.
01:07:51.040 So, the Randy Weingartens of
01:07:52.900 the world have some
01:07:53.840 explaining to do.
01:07:55.740 You know, why can't you
01:07:56.560 prepare everybody so that
01:07:59.040 by the time they're applying
01:07:59.980 for college, affirmative
01:08:01.800 action is, like, a
01:08:03.120 ridiculous idea, because
01:08:05.180 everybody's doing fine.
01:08:07.540 But at the moment, black
01:08:09.280 people are getting
01:08:10.160 terrible educations.
01:08:13.760 So, maybe that gets
01:08:15.740 fixed someday.
01:08:20.440 All right, YouTube,
01:08:21.760 thanks for joining, and I'm
01:08:23.140 going to talk to you
01:08:23.860 tomorrow.