Real Coffee with Scott Adams - July 06, 2023


Episode 2161 Scott Adams: News, Propaganda, Narrative, And Delicious Coffee. I Have Everything Today


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 9 minutes

Words per minute

142.81755

Word count

9,963

Sentence count

804

Harmful content

Misogyny

12

sentences flagged

Toxicity

61

sentences flagged

Hate speech

22

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

Scott Adams talks about a new breakthrough in battery technology, and a story about a woman who had sex with a gay man in a gay club bathroom, and the Biden and the White House sex scandal, and much, much more.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-ra-ba-ba. 0.98
00:00:05.060 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.
00:00:10.240 Probably the best thing that's ever happened to you in your life.
00:00:13.200 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and it's here.
00:00:17.500 It's here. Yeah, good news.
00:00:19.780 And all you need to make this a special day is a cupper mug or a glass,
00:00:23.180 a tecner chalice, a stein' the canteen jug or a flask of SLAV kind.
00:00:27.080 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.
00:00:31.200 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine of the day,
00:00:34.340 the thing that makes everything better.
00:00:37.040 It's called the Simultaneous Sip, and it happens now. Go.
00:00:45.200 Ah.
00:00:47.820 Very good.
00:00:49.460 What a good way to start the day with all of you.
00:00:52.480 I could not be happier.
00:00:53.680 I don't know, is it just me, or does it feel like there's something about the mental health of the country
00:01:04.220 that's rapidly improving for reasons that I'm not entirely clear about?
00:01:10.400 Does it feel like that to you?
00:01:11.820 I feel very much like we reached peak wokeness.
00:01:18.060 And everything now is, you know, it used to be just a one-way march toward greater wokeness,
00:01:24.800 and we all had to go to jail if we didn't like it or get canceled.
00:01:28.520 But now it seems as though between the Supreme Court and, you know,
00:01:33.540 just getting tired of things and maybe seeing things more clearly than we used to,
00:01:38.240 I feel like we've reached the peak and it has started to reverse.
00:01:43.640 And what it feels like is some kind of weird sanity breaking out.
00:01:48.280 It feels like sanity.
00:01:50.120 Does anybody have that feeling?
00:01:52.020 That something like common sense is starting to emerge from the miasma?
00:01:58.000 I don't know.
00:01:59.560 It might be entirely a sort of an individual experience of what news I'm reading or whatever.
00:02:05.340 Now, it could be because the news over the summer is never real news.
00:02:11.480 All the summer news is just recreational news.
00:02:15.220 So we're going to treat it as recreation with the assumption that almost none of it is true,
00:02:20.260 or at least true in total, you know, all context considered.
00:02:25.100 So let's look at the stories.
00:02:27.180 Let's have some fun with the news which is purely recreational
00:02:30.800 because everything is going in the right direction.
00:02:34.260 The economy, pretty much everything is going in the right direction.
00:02:37.820 Maybe slightly, maybe a lot,
00:02:40.400 but pretty much everything is going in the right direction.
00:02:43.780 It's kind of a weird time.
00:02:45.300 You don't expect it.
00:02:46.680 All right.
00:02:47.340 Here's what's happening.
00:02:50.000 How many times have I told you there's a new breakthrough in batteries?
00:02:54.180 Have I mentioned that ever before?
00:02:58.600 Like every two weeks there's a new breakthrough.
00:03:01.720 There's some company that's got a new battery breakthrough.
00:03:04.520 Well, here's one.
00:03:06.760 Apparently you can use rust for creating electricity and storing in a battery.
00:03:12.860 And then you can reverse the rust and turn it back into its original metal.
00:03:17.140 And then you can reverse it again.
00:03:19.600 And that gives you the ability to charge up the battery and then use the power.
00:03:24.740 Now, apparently long ago, years ago, somebody discovered that rust,
00:03:31.560 or something that's like rust, I think rust is not exactly what it is,
00:03:34.580 but it's rust adjacent.
00:03:38.240 And it was good at storing energy.
00:03:42.040 And it was good at storing it in a, let's say, gradual release way,
00:03:46.660 which is the best you want for the grid.
00:03:48.840 But they were too heavy.
00:03:50.720 Too heavy.
00:03:52.060 Was it iron?
00:03:52.980 Must have been iron, huh?
00:03:54.540 They were too heavy,
00:03:55.920 so they didn't make sense for automobiles or phones or anything like that.
00:04:01.420 But if what you're building is a permanent battery for your grid,
00:04:06.520 it doesn't really matter too much how heavy it is,
00:04:09.280 because it's just going to sit there forever.
00:04:10.760 So it turns out it might be, is it lead or is it,
00:04:14.480 I don't know what kind of metal it was,
00:04:15.920 but they rust it and reverse the rust.
00:04:20.320 Anyway, it's supposedly the ideal technology for the grid.
00:04:26.940 So that's good news.
00:04:29.020 All right.
00:04:31.140 You knew there was going to be a story about Don Jr., right?
00:04:34.960 Did everybody see that coming?
00:04:37.060 Let's see.
00:04:37.680 The news is filled with allegations about Hunter Biden
00:04:41.000 and the cocaine at the White House.
00:04:43.160 What do we think will happen this week?
00:04:46.020 Oh, yeah.
00:04:46.700 Oh, yeah.
00:04:47.080 There'll be a story about Don Jr.
00:04:49.660 It's horrible, folks.
00:04:52.980 I hate to break it to you.
00:04:54.840 This terrible, terrible story about Don Jr.
00:04:58.720 Oh, my God.
00:04:59.520 He really...
00:05:00.440 According to Aubrey O'Day,
00:05:03.020 a sexy blonde woman who must be famous for something that I'm not aware of, 1.00
00:05:09.480 she said that she once had sex with Don Jr. 0.99
00:05:13.300 in a gay club bathroom. 1.00
00:05:18.520 So, oh, that's... 0.98
00:05:21.540 I don't know.
00:05:23.520 You got one doing cocaine in the White House, 1.00
00:05:26.500 another one's boinking a hot woman in a gay nightclub. 0.99
00:05:30.900 So, of course, I had to check the comments on Twitter 0.95
00:05:34.140 to see what people would say about that.
00:05:37.440 Oh.
00:05:40.720 All right.
00:05:41.320 Somebody beat me to the joke. 0.69
00:05:43.780 Somebody asked if it meant that Don Jr. was gay.
00:05:48.380 That's what somebody meant.
00:05:50.140 You know, wait a minute. 1.00
00:05:51.560 He had sex with a hot woman in the bathroom of a gay nightclub? 1.00
00:05:54.700 I wonder if he's gay. 1.00
00:05:58.800 That was the best comment I saw. 0.90
00:06:03.220 Now, I'm thinking to myself,
00:06:05.340 this is just me,
00:06:07.040 because, you know, I have a boy brain,
00:06:09.400 so I can only really think like a guy.
00:06:11.880 I can't really turn that off.
00:06:13.800 And I read this story, and I'm thinking to myself,
00:06:16.780 seriously? 0.67
00:06:19.500 Don Jr. went to a gay nightclub and got laid? 0.99
00:06:22.400 Oh, come on. 0.99
00:06:30.500 First son.
00:06:31.740 First son.
00:06:33.000 Give it up for the first son.
00:06:34.900 Whoa.
00:06:35.980 All right.
00:06:37.560 Don Jr.
00:06:39.120 You go.
00:06:40.620 You go, Don Jr.
00:06:43.240 I suppose that's the terrible story about Don Jr.
00:06:47.400 that we're supposed to feel bad about or something,
00:06:49.720 distract us a little bit.
00:06:52.400 But I think Don Jr.
00:06:55.620 has won the first son competition
00:06:57.980 fairly cleanly.
00:07:00.660 Fairly cleanly, I think.
00:07:04.740 All right.
00:07:06.560 You might be aware that the Supreme Court ruled
00:07:09.300 that the government can't coerce social media platforms
00:07:13.900 to limit free speech,
00:07:15.780 because that would just be an extension
00:07:17.640 of a government limiting free speech,
00:07:20.120 even though it's the free market.
00:07:22.680 So now we're in good shape, right?
00:07:25.900 Thank goodness.
00:07:26.880 Thank goodness for the Supreme Court.
00:07:28.420 Yeah, we had that problem of maybe the,
00:07:32.880 you know, maybe the platforms were biased
00:07:36.120 by the government,
00:07:38.000 and so the Supreme Court's fixed that forever.
00:07:40.500 So we'll never have a problem again with bias.
00:07:43.480 Problem solved.
00:07:44.620 Well, my next story is that,
00:07:50.720 do you know what happens when Twitter tries to be unbiased
00:07:56.280 and stops censoring things?
00:08:01.220 Well, it turns out that Facebook starts up a competitor.
00:08:04.540 A competitor.
00:08:06.600 A competitor.
00:08:08.320 It's called Threads,
00:08:09.840 and it launched, I guess, yesterday, last night.
00:08:13.020 And it's a Twitter knockoff,
00:08:16.280 but it's by Facebook slash meta slash Instagram.
00:08:20.280 And people are saying, you know,
00:08:21.880 it has a good chance because the Instagram community
00:08:25.060 will just be moved over if you want to,
00:08:27.400 optionally, I guess.
00:08:28.720 So you can move your followers over to it.
00:08:31.780 A number of people tried it.
00:08:33.240 It had a huge uptick.
00:08:35.160 I think 10 million people signed up pretty quickly, etc.
00:08:40.440 Now, here's my question for you.
00:08:49.060 Do you think that Threads would have happened
00:08:51.480 if Zuckerberg, if Musk had not bought Twitter?
00:08:58.540 Does Threads look like a good business play,
00:09:02.260 or does it look like somebody
00:09:04.180 who is screwing his shareholders, probably,
00:09:07.420 the meta shareholders?
00:09:08.900 Do you think the meta shareholders
00:09:10.500 would like to clone the only social network?
00:09:14.880 Well, it's not the only one.
00:09:16.200 Snapchat doesn't make money.
00:09:17.940 But Twitter doesn't make money.
00:09:20.820 Does Facebook know that Twitter doesn't make money?
00:09:23.100 So their idea is to make half a Twitter,
00:09:27.740 like one that doesn't have, you know,
00:09:29.740 the right mix of people to fight.
00:09:32.680 So they've created basically a Democrat Twitter,
00:09:36.260 which guarantees that neither the Democrat Twitter
00:09:39.260 nor the Republican Twitter,
00:09:40.880 if, you know, if such a thing happens
00:09:43.060 and it just bifurcates,
00:09:45.200 neither of them will have any energy.
00:09:47.380 Neither could they be profitable.
00:09:48.880 To me, it looks like Zuckerberg is using the shareholders' money
00:09:54.040 for political purposes.
00:09:56.800 Am I wrong?
00:09:58.620 Does this look like a business decision?
00:10:04.080 Does it look like Zuckerberg just thought,
00:10:06.460 huh, what would be a good product in the free market?
00:10:10.200 Well, Twitter isn't making any money.
00:10:12.880 Yeah.
00:10:13.360 Why don't we make something that's just like that?
00:10:18.840 I cannot, there's no part of me
00:10:21.380 that thinks that's a business decision.
00:10:24.500 Do you think it is?
00:10:26.360 Do you think that Zuckerberg believes
00:10:27.980 that that's how he could make money?
00:10:31.280 I don't think so.
00:10:32.780 I think this is purely Zuckerberg being a good Democrat,
00:10:36.800 you know, probably doing things
00:10:38.440 that he thinks are good for the country.
00:10:40.240 I'm not saying he has bad intentions.
00:10:41.940 I'm saying that he probably thinks it's good for the country 0.68
00:10:44.660 and shareholders be damned.
00:10:47.980 This is why I don't own stock in Meta. 0.59
00:10:52.600 Because this is the sort of behavior
00:10:54.160 that I'm not looking for in a company I'm investing in.
00:10:57.400 Like, I definitely wouldn't want them to be doing this.
00:11:00.300 That doesn't look like the right business move.
00:11:02.980 But, there it is.
00:11:05.180 The first, I guess the first thread, if you call it that,
00:11:08.860 was from Zuckerberg himself.
00:11:10.620 And he said, and I quote,
00:11:13.040 Let's do this.
00:11:14.280 Welcome to Threads.
00:11:16.400 Let's do this.
00:11:18.680 Now, the story does not mention
00:11:21.020 whether or not he was playing
00:11:22.540 white boy air guitar when he said it.
00:11:25.260 But I believe that that goes better with air guitar.
00:11:28.520 Let me see.
00:11:29.120 Let me see.
00:11:29.620 I'll give you the two.
00:11:30.940 Let's do it.
00:11:31.920 Welcome to Threads.
00:11:33.740 Kind of just lays there, doesn't it?
00:11:35.220 But let's just take this up to full boring white guy level.
00:11:42.760 Air guitar.
00:11:45.940 Let's do this.
00:11:49.600 Right?
00:11:50.500 So much better.
00:11:53.560 Zuckerberg needs some help in the air guitar.
00:11:56.880 That just should have been part of it.
00:11:58.460 All right.
00:12:01.080 So that's happening.
00:12:03.100 I saw a tweet by Donald Luskin,
00:12:06.200 who's a good follow on Twitter.
00:12:07.740 You should follow him.
00:12:09.460 He points out that
00:12:10.820 if it's not bad enough to have a guy named Blinken
00:12:14.740 negotiating for us in China,
00:12:17.840 that's right.
00:12:18.420 Our negotiator is Blinken.
00:12:21.660 It's just, I don't know.
00:12:22.840 The simulation is just messing with us now.
00:12:24.760 But now it turns out that Hunter Biden's new lawyer,
00:12:29.020 who happens to be a GOP operative,
00:12:32.100 is named Riggleman.
00:12:34.400 Riggleman.
00:12:35.440 A lawyer named Riggleman.
00:12:37.860 Now, I think Riggleman should be working on election security,
00:12:41.620 don't you?
00:12:43.080 Yeah.
00:12:43.620 I want a lawyer named Riggleman
00:12:46.000 working on election integrity.
00:12:47.700 Just because.
00:12:49.720 Don't you?
00:12:50.860 Come on.
00:12:51.620 We all want that.
00:12:52.360 All right.
00:12:54.320 Rasmussen did a little poll
00:12:55.820 about what people think about
00:12:57.380 that cocaine in the White House.
00:13:02.100 And 58% of likely U.S. voters
00:13:04.420 think it is likely.
00:13:06.400 The president was involved
00:13:07.800 in Hunter's foreign business deals.
00:13:10.300 Oh, so it's more about the foreign business deals.
00:13:14.680 So a majority,
00:13:16.820 pretty solid majority,
00:13:18.500 think that the president was involved
00:13:20.120 in Hunter's business deals.
00:13:21.220 Now,
00:13:22.720 are you surprised that anybody still pretends
00:13:26.540 that they think he wasn't?
00:13:29.760 Do you think they're uninformed
00:13:31.320 or is this recreational belief?
00:13:34.660 Where, for fun,
00:13:36.500 you pretend that you're on the other side,
00:13:38.460 yeah, no,
00:13:39.360 he had nothing to do with it.
00:13:41.500 It doesn't feel like a real opinion.
00:13:44.000 Does it?
00:13:44.500 Like, I could understand
00:13:46.180 if people are just,
00:13:47.100 you know,
00:13:48.960 uninformed.
00:13:50.320 But the uninformed
00:13:51.260 usually are smart enough
00:13:52.480 to say they don't know
00:13:53.540 when they get polled.
00:13:57.340 But really,
00:13:58.560 could there really be
00:13:59.600 that many Democrats
00:14:00.600 who actually believe
00:14:02.640 that the dad was unaware?
00:14:06.560 It doesn't even seem possible.
00:14:08.640 I guess anything's possible.
00:14:09.860 But it feels recreational.
00:14:13.220 It doesn't feel like a real opinion.
00:14:16.580 Maybe none of our opinions are real.
00:14:18.500 Maybe mine are not real either.
00:14:20.520 But this one seems extra not real.
00:14:23.360 All right.
00:14:24.020 Well,
00:14:24.540 by now,
00:14:25.200 you've probably all seen
00:14:26.080 the press reports
00:14:27.400 in which Hunter Biden's
00:14:30.360 new attorney,
00:14:31.020 Riggleman,
00:14:32.220 denied that the cocaine found
00:14:34.440 in the White House
00:14:35.600 was Hunter's.
00:14:37.780 Did you all see that?
00:14:38.700 Did you see the press release
00:14:40.700 where Hunter denied
00:14:41.500 it was his?
00:14:42.680 Oh, it didn't happen.
00:14:44.920 Oh, no,
00:14:45.780 you didn't see it
00:14:46.340 because it didn't happen.
00:14:48.140 Now,
00:14:48.580 if you were Hunter Biden
00:14:50.760 and you'd been accused
00:14:52.960 of much bad behavior,
00:14:55.780 which apparently was true,
00:14:57.660 don't you think that
00:14:59.340 right near the top
00:15:00.980 of the things you would do
00:15:01.980 in this situation,
00:15:03.020 if that cocaine
00:15:04.240 were not yours,
00:15:06.180 wouldn't the first thing
00:15:07.940 you do
00:15:08.440 really near the top
00:15:10.140 of the first things
00:15:10.960 you do in the morning
00:15:11.700 when you woke up
00:15:12.580 is call your lawyer
00:15:13.940 and say,
00:15:15.060 can you just put out
00:15:15.760 a boring press release
00:15:17.100 that just says,
00:15:19.060 you know,
00:15:19.340 I had nothing to do with it?
00:15:20.960 Just put it out there.
00:15:23.600 Where's that?
00:15:25.420 Now,
00:15:25.880 I do understand
00:15:26.660 that if it had been
00:15:27.940 his cocaine,
00:15:29.060 it might be a bad play
00:15:30.900 to deny it.
00:15:32.260 You know,
00:15:32.520 just let it play out
00:15:33.780 for a while.
00:15:34.160 But what if it's,
00:15:35.740 what if he knows
00:15:36.440 for sure it's not his?
00:15:39.180 How do you play it
00:15:40.180 if you know it's not yours?
00:15:41.560 If you know it,
00:15:42.900 do you stay silent?
00:15:44.540 Is that how you play it
00:15:45.340 if you know it's yours?
00:15:46.800 Or if you know
00:15:47.540 it's not yours
00:15:48.320 and the news is saying
00:15:49.400 it might be
00:15:49.900 or social media
00:15:50.980 is saying it might be.
00:15:52.400 So you just stay silent
00:15:53.740 in that situation,
00:15:54.680 right?
00:15:56.260 Hunter Biden
00:15:56.960 went to law school too.
00:15:59.860 Isn't he actually a lawyer?
00:16:01.740 And he's got a lawyer
00:16:03.760 and he works in government
00:16:05.700 so he's surrounded
00:16:06.680 by experts
00:16:07.660 and advisors
00:16:08.940 and staffers
00:16:09.980 who can tell you
00:16:10.760 exactly the right thing
00:16:11.920 to do.
00:16:12.680 You know what the right
00:16:13.600 thing to do would be?
00:16:15.680 If it's not his,
00:16:18.440 the right thing to do
00:16:20.180 is to say
00:16:21.720 it's not yours.
00:16:23.660 It's not really hard,
00:16:25.180 is it?
00:16:26.540 Now,
00:16:26.960 of course,
00:16:27.400 people might say
00:16:28.160 he's lying
00:16:28.820 or whatever,
00:16:29.500 but it's the easiest
00:16:32.240 thing to say
00:16:33.080 that wasn't mine.
00:16:34.820 How hard is that?
00:16:36.940 But it's not there.
00:16:38.400 It's missing.
00:16:39.680 The dog is simply
00:16:40.600 not barking.
00:16:41.740 Not only is the dog
00:16:42.820 not barking,
00:16:43.860 but you had to wait
00:16:44.840 for me
00:16:45.620 to tell you that.
00:16:48.580 Did CNN say
00:16:49.540 where's the denial?
00:16:51.260 Did CNN say
00:16:52.180 we've contacted him
00:16:53.360 and he won't comment?
00:16:55.460 Do you remember
00:16:55.920 that story
00:16:56.440 where they tried
00:16:57.020 to get a comment
00:16:57.620 and he wouldn't comment?
00:16:58.320 Or they couldn't
00:16:59.440 find him?
00:17:00.600 Or they couldn't
00:17:01.340 find anybody
00:17:01.840 who could find him?
00:17:03.040 They couldn't
00:17:03.380 find his lawyer?
00:17:04.760 Couldn't get
00:17:05.160 any comment
00:17:05.660 whatsoever?
00:17:07.040 Do you remember
00:17:07.660 when they reported
00:17:08.440 that Hunter
00:17:09.200 said no comment?
00:17:10.580 No, you don't
00:17:11.400 because they
00:17:12.120 never reported that.
00:17:13.500 They didn't report
00:17:14.220 they tried to reach him.
00:17:15.260 They didn't report
00:17:15.840 what he said.
00:17:16.480 They didn't report
00:17:17.060 where he is.
00:17:17.660 They didn't report
00:17:18.220 they talked to his lawyer.
00:17:20.160 Nothing.
00:17:23.560 And we all just
00:17:24.440 sat here
00:17:24.880 with our thumbs up 0.99
00:17:25.700 our asses 0.99
00:17:26.280 acting like that 1.00
00:17:27.000 was normal.
00:17:27.520 Oh, that's normal.
00:17:31.200 All right.
00:17:32.660 What else?
00:17:37.340 Now, what about
00:17:38.260 the fingerprints?
00:17:41.300 At least law enforcement
00:17:42.820 has told us
00:17:43.800 that the baggie
00:17:46.060 didn't have
00:17:47.020 any fingerprints
00:17:47.540 on it.
00:17:48.100 So at least we know
00:17:48.760 that, right?
00:17:49.800 What?
00:17:50.580 What?
00:17:51.380 Oh, we haven't heard.
00:17:53.400 That's right.
00:17:53.920 We haven't heard
00:17:54.720 not only
00:17:55.900 if the fingerprints
00:17:57.220 identify anybody,
00:17:58.720 but we haven't even
00:17:59.920 heard if they tried
00:18:00.800 to get any.
00:18:02.760 Don't you think
00:18:03.540 that law enforcement
00:18:04.360 would say
00:18:04.880 we have some prints?
00:18:07.300 Or,
00:18:08.320 alternately,
00:18:09.440 they would say
00:18:09.920 we checked for prints
00:18:10.820 and didn't find any.
00:18:12.780 Wouldn't you expect
00:18:13.540 that to be in the news?
00:18:15.440 The single most
00:18:16.420 obvious thing.
00:18:18.380 The single most
00:18:19.340 obvious part.
00:18:20.200 Well, DNA.
00:18:21.940 Could you get DNA
00:18:22.960 off of just somebody
00:18:24.500 touching a baggie?
00:18:27.480 All right.
00:18:28.660 I don't know
00:18:29.320 if you can.
00:18:30.220 I did hear
00:18:30.940 from a fingerprint expert.
00:18:33.140 This is what I love
00:18:34.020 about social media.
00:18:35.040 Of all things,
00:18:37.700 there's somebody
00:18:38.120 who's a fingerprint expert
00:18:39.420 who's one of my followers.
00:18:41.840 And the fingerprint expert
00:18:43.140 said that getting
00:18:44.180 a print off
00:18:45.320 a plastic bag,
00:18:46.600 a baggie,
00:18:47.400 is actually
00:18:48.240 close to impossible.
00:18:49.980 Did you know that?
00:18:51.820 Did you know
00:18:52.500 it's really hard
00:18:53.060 to get a print
00:18:53.820 off a plastic bag?
00:18:55.360 Do you know
00:18:55.780 how I knew it?
00:18:57.340 Not from the news.
00:18:59.440 Did you see it
00:19:00.060 on CNN?
00:19:00.960 Nope.
00:19:01.900 Did CNN ever say,
00:19:03.040 you know,
00:19:03.180 it'd be hard
00:19:03.500 to get a print
00:19:04.000 off a plastic bag?
00:19:05.500 If it is,
00:19:06.160 I mean,
00:19:06.440 I heard it from
00:19:07.040 one person
00:19:07.620 who sounded
00:19:08.180 like an expert.
00:19:09.660 How about Fox News?
00:19:11.320 Even Fox News
00:19:12.140 didn't report it.
00:19:13.620 That it's hard
00:19:15.140 to get a print
00:19:15.680 off a baggie
00:19:16.360 or that it's easy.
00:19:18.000 Tell us it's easy,
00:19:19.100 it's hard,
00:19:19.940 we could definitely
00:19:20.620 get some DNA,
00:19:21.640 we can't get some DNA,
00:19:23.240 might get a fingerprint,
00:19:24.500 might not,
00:19:25.200 might be partial,
00:19:27.080 might belong
00:19:27.720 to other people,
00:19:28.520 you don't know,
00:19:29.220 right?
00:19:30.760 Everything about
00:19:31.580 this story
00:19:32.060 is just missing.
00:19:32.820 Everything that matters
00:19:35.220 about this story
00:19:35.940 is just missing.
00:19:36.980 The only thing
00:19:37.640 that I'm surprised
00:19:38.320 they told us
00:19:39.000 is that it tested out
00:19:40.700 as a drug.
00:19:43.180 That's the only thing
00:19:44.000 I'm surprised about.
00:19:45.860 All right.
00:19:46.200 I don't know
00:19:53.700 why this story
00:19:54.240 is out of order.
00:19:55.120 I've got an
00:19:55.520 out of order story
00:19:56.340 I'll have to get back to.
00:19:58.560 But I don't know
00:19:59.820 if you saw
00:20:00.140 that the Daily Wire
00:20:01.500 featured one of my tweets
00:20:03.320 on this issue.
00:20:06.220 So Politico
00:20:07.580 had a headline yesterday
00:20:08.800 that said,
00:20:09.920 White House cocaine
00:20:10.800 culprit unlikely
00:20:12.160 to be found.
00:20:14.560 Law enforcement says.
00:20:16.860 Now,
00:20:18.100 how in the world
00:20:19.000 is that unlikely?
00:20:21.440 How in the world
00:20:22.360 is that unlikely?
00:20:23.840 Unless,
00:20:25.620 unless,
00:20:27.280 Hunter's not saying
00:20:29.640 it isn't his,
00:20:31.040 nobody's talking
00:20:31.880 about DNA
00:20:32.520 or fingerprints,
00:20:33.820 and they're
00:20:34.280 completely silent
00:20:35.280 about surveillance
00:20:37.740 and video cams
00:20:38.960 in that area,
00:20:39.960 or even what area
00:20:40.920 it was.
00:20:41.300 But still,
00:20:43.860 Politico
00:20:44.400 is feeling
00:20:45.400 some confidence
00:20:46.160 in this headline.
00:20:47.840 White House cocaine
00:20:48.800 culprit unlikely
00:20:49.920 to be found.
00:20:51.300 Now,
00:20:51.800 what type of persuasion
00:20:53.300 is that?
00:20:54.140 Because this is
00:20:54.880 obviously propaganda
00:20:55.920 narrative.
00:20:57.760 What type of,
00:20:58.880 so I call it
00:21:00.100 softening up the room.
00:21:02.480 Softening up the room.
00:21:04.160 Basically,
00:21:05.000 people can get
00:21:05.740 used to anything
00:21:06.940 if they just
00:21:08.300 get exposed
00:21:08.880 to it a lot.
00:21:10.180 So what you
00:21:10.680 don't want
00:21:11.380 is,
00:21:12.460 you know,
00:21:13.040 to go down
00:21:13.980 the line
00:21:14.500 and then someday
00:21:16.000 find out
00:21:17.320 that you can't
00:21:18.260 figure out
00:21:18.660 who it is.
00:21:20.100 You want people
00:21:21.020 to say right ahead,
00:21:22.000 I don't know,
00:21:22.860 this is one of those
00:21:23.860 situations where
00:21:24.900 I think it would
00:21:25.960 be unlikely
00:21:26.680 we'd figure out
00:21:27.500 who the real
00:21:27.980 culprit was.
00:21:29.200 Very unlikely.
00:21:31.040 Yeah.
00:21:31.400 So then a year
00:21:32.760 from now
00:21:33.200 when in fact
00:21:33.800 we don't know
00:21:34.420 who it was
00:21:35.100 or at least
00:21:35.820 it's not reported,
00:21:37.240 we can say,
00:21:38.280 yeah,
00:21:38.600 that's sort of
00:21:39.200 what everybody
00:21:39.660 expected.
00:21:40.760 You know,
00:21:40.940 the experts
00:21:41.500 told us
00:21:42.440 we're not going
00:21:42.960 to find out
00:21:43.420 who it is.
00:21:44.840 Pure propaganda.
00:21:47.380 So a number
00:21:48.700 of people
00:21:49.080 called them out
00:21:50.320 for it.
00:21:50.760 I was one of them.
00:21:51.860 Daily Wire
00:21:52.540 printed my tweet
00:21:56.160 in which I said
00:21:57.000 we can now
00:21:58.060 accurately predict
00:21:59.100 all future headlines
00:22:00.160 and here's one
00:22:01.040 we all knew
00:22:01.560 was coming
00:22:02.080 and it was
00:22:02.580 the headline
00:22:03.080 about White House
00:22:04.220 cocaine culprit
00:22:05.000 unlikely to be found.
00:22:07.540 Didn't every one
00:22:08.660 of you know
00:22:09.200 that that headline
00:22:09.860 was coming?
00:22:11.480 Is there anybody
00:22:12.200 here who didn't
00:22:12.940 know for sure
00:22:13.980 that there would
00:22:15.080 be a headline
00:22:15.540 saying that?
00:22:16.840 I don't know.
00:22:18.040 We just can't
00:22:18.840 find the Epstein
00:22:20.620 client.
00:22:21.820 Oh,
00:22:22.180 did I say Epstein?
00:22:22.900 I'm sorry,
00:22:23.240 I meant a whole
00:22:24.380 different story.
00:22:25.740 Yeah,
00:22:26.000 no,
00:22:26.260 we will never
00:22:27.100 be able to find
00:22:27.940 the,
00:22:28.200 you just knew
00:22:30.380 it was going
00:22:30.780 to go this
00:22:31.280 way.
00:22:32.820 Now,
00:22:34.140 don't you think
00:22:35.360 that the entire
00:22:36.260 White House
00:22:37.340 security operation
00:22:38.940 should be fired?
00:22:41.080 If it's true
00:22:42.120 that there was
00:22:43.380 no video surveillance
00:22:44.580 in a part of the,
00:22:45.340 in part of the
00:22:46.300 White House,
00:22:48.180 they couldn't,
00:22:48.880 they couldn't even
00:22:49.440 tell from the,
00:22:50.820 are you telling me
00:22:51.460 they couldn't even
00:22:51.980 tell from the
00:22:52.580 hallway cameras
00:22:53.660 who entered the room?
00:22:55.440 couldn't even tell
00:22:56.580 who entered the
00:22:57.340 room,
00:22:57.540 right?
00:22:58.100 Because there's
00:22:58.700 no surveillance
00:22:59.320 in there?
00:23:01.560 Come on,
00:23:02.980 come on.
00:23:04.300 The entire,
00:23:05.240 they would all
00:23:05.840 be fired by now
00:23:06.940 if they didn't
00:23:07.900 already know
00:23:08.400 who this was.
00:23:10.160 All right.
00:23:12.800 I would like
00:23:13.620 to add my own
00:23:15.040 conspiracy theory
00:23:16.100 to the mix.
00:23:17.220 I don't believe
00:23:18.060 I've heard this
00:23:18.760 one yet.
00:23:19.980 So,
00:23:20.660 will you do me
00:23:21.180 some fact checking
00:23:21.980 and tell me
00:23:23.060 if you've seen
00:23:23.660 this on social
00:23:24.400 media or any
00:23:25.540 pundit?
00:23:27.540 The most likely
00:23:29.280 person or
00:23:30.760 entities that
00:23:32.240 would leave that
00:23:33.020 cocaine in the
00:23:33.700 White House
00:23:34.120 would be,
00:23:35.480 go,
00:23:36.720 the most likely
00:23:37.640 person to leave
00:23:38.420 that bag of
00:23:39.000 cocaine would
00:23:39.800 be,
00:23:40.120 most likely,
00:23:41.740 most likely
00:23:43.040 staffers,
00:23:45.920 Zelensky,
00:23:47.480 Don Jr.,
00:23:48.940 reporters,
00:23:50.160 yeah.
00:23:53.220 So,
00:23:53.940 if it had
00:23:54.340 been,
00:23:54.620 if it had
00:23:55.400 been left
00:23:56.000 accidentally,
00:23:58.080 if it had
00:24:00.300 been left
00:24:01.080 accidentally,
00:24:01.880 you'd probably
00:24:02.240 think staffers,
00:24:04.000 yeah.
00:24:04.280 I would think
00:24:05.020 that Hunter
00:24:05.520 is maybe
00:24:07.100 not in the,
00:24:09.320 not at the
00:24:10.160 very top of
00:24:10.880 my suspect
00:24:11.440 list.
00:24:12.400 He'd be
00:24:12.780 around number
00:24:13.360 three,
00:24:14.720 you know,
00:24:14.940 just my
00:24:15.320 personal
00:24:15.780 judgment of
00:24:16.480 things.
00:24:17.780 But there
00:24:18.440 could be
00:24:18.680 lots of
00:24:18.980 people,
00:24:19.340 right?
00:24:20.160 All right,
00:24:21.180 here's my,
00:24:24.800 this might
00:24:25.460 actually change
00:24:26.060 the headlines,
00:24:26.840 so I'm a
00:24:27.140 little hesitant
00:24:27.640 to say it.
00:24:28.780 You ready
00:24:29.160 for this?
00:24:31.340 It looks
00:24:32.140 like an
00:24:32.480 intelligence
00:24:32.860 operation to
00:24:33.680 me.
00:24:36.400 There's
00:24:36.980 nothing that
00:24:38.360 screams
00:24:38.920 law enforcement
00:24:41.260 or intelligence
00:24:42.120 operation like
00:24:43.220 planting drugs.
00:24:45.360 Planting drugs
00:24:46.440 is sort of
00:24:47.700 like, you
00:24:49.240 know,
00:24:49.620 operation,
00:24:51.080 it's like,
00:24:52.220 it's like the
00:24:52.740 first lesson,
00:24:53.440 isn't it?
00:24:54.680 What is more
00:24:55.620 basic than
00:24:56.220 planting drugs
00:24:57.040 somewhere?
00:24:58.200 I can't think
00:24:58.780 of anything.
00:24:59.720 You know,
00:24:59.920 maybe taking
00:25:00.500 some naughty
00:25:01.560 pictures of
00:25:02.120 somebody having 0.76
00:25:02.560 sex that they 0.92
00:25:03.400 don't know
00:25:03.720 about.
00:25:04.740 It's like the
00:25:05.300 most basic
00:25:05.760 thing.
00:25:07.060 So,
00:25:07.980 ask yourself
00:25:08.840 this.
00:25:10.000 How badly
00:25:10.760 does the
00:25:11.840 deep state
00:25:14.080 want Biden 1.00
00:25:15.200 to willingly
00:25:16.340 get out of
00:25:16.980 the race?
00:25:18.260 How much
00:25:18.800 do the real
00:25:19.940 people of
00:25:20.480 power,
00:25:20.960 whoever they
00:25:21.420 might be,
00:25:21.920 let's call
00:25:22.320 them the
00:25:22.660 deep state,
00:25:23.640 how much
00:25:24.140 do even
00:25:24.680 the Democrats
00:25:25.580 want Biden 1.00
00:25:26.980 to leave so
00:25:27.620 they have a
00:25:27.940 better chance
00:25:28.900 of winning?
00:25:30.760 A lot.
00:25:32.280 Do you
00:25:32.700 think it
00:25:33.060 could be a
00:25:33.600 GOP operative,
00:25:35.240 just somebody
00:25:35.800 who had access
00:25:36.380 to the White 0.57
00:25:36.880 House,
00:25:37.160 and just
00:25:38.240 took it out
00:25:38.660 of their
00:25:38.820 pocket,
00:25:39.460 shoved it
00:25:39.800 on the
00:25:40.040 shelf,
00:25:41.240 and said,
00:25:42.920 when they
00:25:43.380 find this,
00:25:44.220 that's the
00:25:44.560 end to the
00:25:44.920 Bidens.
00:25:47.140 Because,
00:25:47.740 ask yourself
00:25:48.500 this,
00:25:49.980 Hunter Biden,
00:25:51.440 you know,
00:25:51.800 the story is
00:25:52.380 that Hunter
00:25:52.740 Biden is back
00:25:53.480 in the White
00:25:53.900 House,
00:25:54.800 you know,
00:25:55.000 after being
00:25:55.500 sort of out
00:25:56.540 of the news,
00:25:57.200 his plea
00:25:57.700 deal is the
00:25:58.740 news,
00:25:59.500 and then he's
00:25:59.900 back in the
00:26:00.360 White House.
00:26:01.180 What are the
00:26:01.940 odds?
00:26:02.920 What are the
00:26:03.360 odds that Hunter
00:26:04.280 is the one
00:26:05.360 who put it
00:26:05.740 there?
00:26:07.160 Really?
00:26:08.180 Now,
00:26:08.940 isn't that a
00:26:09.680 little bit too
00:26:10.100 on the nose?
00:26:11.500 Don't we know
00:26:12.080 that Hunter is
00:26:12.620 somebody that
00:26:13.100 forgets things,
00:26:14.260 like laptops all
00:26:15.220 over the place?
00:26:16.480 A little on the
00:26:17.280 nose, huh?
00:26:18.700 Happens to be
00:26:19.340 cocaine,
00:26:20.080 just happens to
00:26:20.780 be Hunter's
00:26:21.520 preferred drug,
00:26:22.720 and he's a guy
00:26:23.380 who leaves things
00:26:24.080 and places,
00:26:24.920 and he's just
00:26:25.500 been in the
00:26:26.000 news,
00:26:26.580 and then suddenly
00:26:28.100 he brings
00:26:29.460 cocaine to the
00:26:30.140 White House?
00:26:31.240 Isn't that a
00:26:31.960 little bit
00:26:32.380 exactly on the
00:26:33.520 nose?
00:26:34.900 All right.
00:26:35.300 I'm going to
00:26:36.540 go for
00:26:37.180 fake story.
00:26:40.480 I say it's
00:26:41.580 not Hunters,
00:26:42.860 and it's not
00:26:43.720 a staffer,
00:26:44.820 and it was
00:26:45.240 not left
00:26:45.740 there accidentally.
00:26:48.420 Not Hunters,
00:26:49.960 not anybody
00:26:50.780 else leaving
00:26:51.900 it accidentally.
00:26:53.240 It is not
00:26:53.940 accidental.
00:26:56.760 Now,
00:26:57.320 has anybody
00:26:57.580 else said
00:26:57.900 that?
00:26:59.120 Have you
00:26:59.680 heard that
00:26:59.980 speculation
00:27:00.580 anywhere else?
00:27:01.360 Because I
00:27:01.600 haven't seen
00:27:01.960 it anywhere else.
00:27:03.440 Anybody else?
00:27:04.020 All right.
00:27:07.400 So you
00:27:07.640 haven't seen
00:27:08.040 that before.
00:27:09.740 Now,
00:27:10.380 you tell me
00:27:11.180 that that's
00:27:11.600 not the
00:27:11.960 most likely
00:27:12.520 scenario.
00:27:14.180 Compare
00:27:14.460 these two
00:27:15.020 scenarios.
00:27:16.740 If you
00:27:17.640 wanted Hunter
00:27:18.360 Biden and
00:27:18.980 the Bidens
00:27:19.380 to go down,
00:27:20.880 this would
00:27:21.420 be the
00:27:21.740 entire amount
00:27:22.460 of effort
00:27:22.900 it would
00:27:23.160 take to
00:27:23.500 take them
00:27:23.900 down.
00:27:25.200 Let's say
00:27:25.820 you're just
00:27:26.400 a bad 1.00
00:27:26.740 person.
00:27:27.900 You had
00:27:28.160 access to
00:27:28.660 the White
00:27:28.800 House.
00:27:29.260 This is
00:27:29.760 your entire
00:27:30.360 that's
00:27:33.760 it.
00:27:34.460 And the
00:27:34.780 entire
00:27:35.060 administration
00:27:35.660 is gone.
00:27:36.620 You reach
00:27:37.020 into your
00:27:37.260 pocket.
00:27:38.520 You stand
00:27:38.920 in front
00:27:39.300 of the
00:27:39.540 security
00:27:39.800 camera.
00:27:39.900 Maybe you
00:27:40.200 know where
00:27:40.460 the security
00:27:41.260 camera is.
00:27:42.100 Maybe you
00:27:42.540 even know
00:27:42.800 where it
00:27:43.000 is.
00:27:46.420 So you
00:27:46.940 just take
00:27:47.420 it out of
00:27:47.680 your pocket.
00:27:48.240 You slip
00:27:48.600 it in a
00:27:48.940 cubbyhole
00:27:49.400 or wherever
00:27:49.780 they found
00:27:50.220 it.
00:27:51.740 Literally
00:27:52.140 reach in
00:27:52.780 your pocket
00:27:53.220 and you
00:27:53.620 end the
00:27:53.960 Biden
00:27:54.180 administration.
00:27:55.740 That's
00:27:55.980 it.
00:27:57.740 Literally
00:27:58.140 reach in
00:27:59.040 your pocket
00:27:59.740 put something
00:28:01.700 on a shelf
00:28:02.340 or wherever
00:28:02.780 the hell
00:28:03.020 it was.
00:28:04.100 That's the
00:28:04.500 end of the
00:28:04.860 Biden
00:28:05.080 administration.
00:28:07.500 You don't
00:28:08.220 think that
00:28:08.760 there's anybody
00:28:09.380 who thought
00:28:09.920 of that?
00:28:12.300 It would
00:28:12.940 be the
00:28:13.260 perfect
00:28:13.540 op.
00:28:15.180 It would
00:28:15.740 be the
00:28:16.020 perfect
00:28:16.340 op.
00:28:17.300 Now the
00:28:17.640 one person
00:28:19.280 or entity
00:28:19.880 that I'm
00:28:20.280 going to
00:28:20.480 rule out
00:28:21.080 I'm going
00:28:22.340 to rule
00:28:22.780 out Ukraine.
00:28:26.140 Ukraine I
00:28:26.860 think likes
00:28:27.240 Biden.
00:28:27.580 I would
00:28:28.780 rule out
00:28:29.380 the
00:28:29.680 military
00:28:30.260 industrial
00:28:30.740 complex
00:28:31.460 because they
00:28:33.120 like Biden.
00:28:34.240 They like
00:28:34.680 him spending
00:28:35.120 money on
00:28:35.560 Ukraine.
00:28:37.000 So if
00:28:38.060 the
00:28:38.260 military
00:28:38.700 industrial
00:28:39.200 complex
00:28:40.060 overlaps
00:28:41.880 with the
00:28:42.280 deep
00:28:42.480 state
00:28:42.900 then it
00:28:44.340 wasn't
00:28:44.660 them.
00:28:46.060 Because the
00:28:47.000 deep state
00:28:47.740 and the
00:28:48.000 military
00:28:48.340 industrial
00:28:48.800 complex
00:28:49.300 probably
00:28:49.980 wants
00:28:50.480 Biden
00:28:50.880 in there.
00:28:51.840 Now
00:28:52.000 unless
00:28:52.560 they figured
00:28:53.200 out
00:28:53.460 here's the
00:28:54.200 other
00:28:54.340 possibility.
00:28:54.860 The other
00:28:55.800 possibility is
00:28:56.560 that the
00:28:57.000 deep state
00:28:57.700 and the
00:28:58.080 military
00:28:58.420 industrial
00:28:58.940 complex
00:28:59.620 are working
00:29:00.800 together and
00:29:01.940 they know
00:29:02.340 that Biden
00:29:03.120 even though
00:29:03.640 Biden was
00:29:04.140 perfectly
00:29:04.660 their guy
00:29:05.280 for spending
00:29:06.560 money he
00:29:08.500 might be
00:29:09.020 declining so
00:29:09.920 much and
00:29:10.900 they know
00:29:11.440 more than
00:29:11.900 you know.
00:29:13.060 So the
00:29:13.580 people closest
00:29:14.380 to him
00:29:14.780 you know
00:29:15.020 the spooks
00:29:15.840 the CIA
00:29:16.340 they have a
00:29:17.560 much better
00:29:18.060 idea whether
00:29:18.780 Biden can
00:29:19.780 make it
00:29:20.200 another year
00:29:20.780 to the
00:29:21.080 election.
00:29:21.420 they know
00:29:22.900 you and
00:29:24.120 I don't
00:29:24.460 know
00:29:24.640 necessarily
00:29:25.180 we're
00:29:25.480 guessing
00:29:25.800 but they
00:29:26.640 know
00:29:26.940 so they
00:29:28.120 would know
00:29:28.420 his exact
00:29:29.080 medical
00:29:29.560 condition
00:29:30.080 they would
00:29:31.020 know that
00:29:31.620 when we
00:29:32.420 don't see
00:29:32.920 Biden he's
00:29:33.660 in bad
00:29:34.080 shape
00:29:34.440 they would
00:29:35.240 know what
00:29:35.640 drug they
00:29:36.140 give him
00:29:36.520 before he
00:29:37.000 goes in
00:29:37.540 public
00:29:37.920 if there
00:29:38.520 is one
00:29:38.880 right.
00:29:40.280 So they
00:29:41.160 would have
00:29:41.500 a much
00:29:41.940 more dire
00:29:42.960 opinion of
00:29:44.180 Biden
00:29:44.480 than we
00:29:45.080 do
00:29:45.360 because they
00:29:46.680 could see
00:29:47.120 it first.
00:29:49.060 We the
00:29:49.540 public are
00:29:50.140 getting you
00:29:50.640 know just
00:29:50.920 these little
00:29:51.320 glimpses
00:29:51.860 that are
00:29:52.200 horrifying
00:29:53.000 but imagine
00:29:54.280 the stuff
00:29:54.740 we don't
00:29:55.300 see.
00:29:56.860 The stuff
00:29:57.600 we see
00:29:58.020 Biden
00:29:58.400 try to
00:29:58.900 do in
00:29:59.180 public
00:29:59.440 is
00:29:59.640 horrifying
00:30:00.140 like his 0.88
00:30:01.200 lack of
00:30:01.660 cognitive
00:30:02.100 ability.
00:30:03.340 Imagine
00:30:03.840 what that
00:30:04.340 looks like
00:30:04.860 privately.
00:30:06.720 Just imagine
00:30:07.640 what he looks
00:30:08.120 like when
00:30:08.440 he's not
00:30:08.920 at his
00:30:09.280 best
00:30:09.700 when they
00:30:10.860 haven't
00:30:11.240 you know
00:30:11.560 made sure
00:30:12.520 that he
00:30:13.080 can get
00:30:13.440 a good
00:30:14.080 ten minute
00:30:14.540 speech
00:30:14.900 and get
00:30:15.180 off the
00:30:15.420 stage.
00:30:16.040 It must
00:30:16.580 be scary
00:30:17.180 behind the
00:30:18.300 scenes.
00:30:19.520 So
00:30:19.700 one
00:30:23.240 possibility
00:30:24.020 is that
00:30:24.620 it was
00:30:24.960 a
00:30:25.240 diabolical 0.99
00:30:26.220 Republican 1.00
00:30:26.840 who just
00:30:28.780 had access
00:30:29.460 to the
00:30:29.740 White House
00:30:30.060 and stuffed
00:30:30.600 it there
00:30:30.900 or bribed
00:30:32.380 the cleaning
00:30:32.900 crew to put
00:30:33.440 it there.
00:30:33.760 There's a
00:30:34.020 million ways
00:30:34.480 he could
00:30:34.700 get there.
00:30:35.620 But the
00:30:36.640 other possibility
00:30:37.280 is that the
00:30:37.780 deep state
00:30:38.280 has decided
00:30:38.920 that Biden
00:30:39.600 cannot represent
00:30:41.180 them.
00:30:42.240 It's just
00:30:42.660 he's too
00:30:43.120 far gone
00:30:43.660 and they
00:30:44.380 need a
00:30:44.740 chance of
00:30:45.140 winning
00:30:45.380 and they
00:30:45.840 need to
00:30:46.180 take him
00:30:46.660 out soon
00:30:47.160 so that
00:30:48.400 Newsom
00:30:49.020 can slot
00:30:49.660 in there
00:30:50.040 and keep
00:30:50.800 the money
00:30:51.160 rolling for
00:30:51.760 Ukraine.
00:30:53.580 So
00:30:53.860 having now
00:30:55.920 heard this
00:30:56.580 hypothesis
00:30:57.920 it's just
00:30:58.840 a hypothesis
00:30:59.460 how likely
00:31:01.360 does it seem
00:31:01.980 to you
00:31:02.260 that it
00:31:02.500 was planted?
00:31:04.440 Go.
00:31:05.360 Have I
00:31:05.660 convinced anybody?
00:31:06.520 How likely
00:31:07.280 it was planted?
00:31:08.200 We don't know
00:31:08.720 we wouldn't
00:31:09.260 know who
00:31:09.740 but how likely
00:31:10.940 it was planted.
00:31:12.180 I'm seeing a lot
00:31:12.600 of zeros
00:31:12.980 and 25s.
00:31:14.480 Interesting.
00:31:15.960 The 25
00:31:16.700 you're probably
00:31:17.080 joking but
00:31:17.780 I don't know
00:31:22.080 would you
00:31:22.980 take cocaine
00:31:23.840 out of your
00:31:24.540 pocket if you
00:31:25.280 were in the
00:31:25.820 White House?
00:31:28.480 Would you?
00:31:29.160 Would you
00:31:29.480 take it out
00:31:29.900 of your
00:31:30.080 pocket?
00:31:32.000 And if you
00:31:32.680 took it out
00:31:33.100 of your
00:31:33.260 pocket and
00:31:33.700 you used
00:31:34.100 it wouldn't
00:31:35.380 it be the
00:31:35.860 highest priority
00:31:36.760 you were
00:31:37.160 thinking about
00:31:37.800 to not get
00:31:38.380 caught?
00:31:39.380 And you
00:31:39.820 know you
00:31:40.020 look around
00:31:40.480 your space
00:31:40.980 before you
00:31:41.420 left?
00:31:42.940 I don't know
00:31:43.240 it's possible
00:31:44.420 that a
00:31:45.880 druggie
00:31:46.360 could leave
00:31:46.880 some drugs.
00:31:47.740 It's very
00:31:48.140 possible.
00:31:49.140 Druggies forget
00:31:49.780 stuff they leave
00:31:50.500 drugs.
00:31:51.060 Hunter's a
00:31:51.460 perfect example.
00:31:52.640 But if you
00:31:53.040 compare the
00:31:53.720 odds of that
00:31:54.360 happening at
00:31:54.980 the exact
00:31:56.220 time.
00:31:57.780 Alright here's a
00:31:58.440 better way to
00:31:58.800 say it.
00:31:59.440 If you said to
00:32:00.080 me Scott
00:32:00.600 there was one
00:32:01.680 time over the
00:32:02.340 course of the
00:32:02.900 four year
00:32:03.340 administration
00:32:03.920 that Hunter
00:32:04.520 left some
00:32:05.000 cocaine in the
00:32:05.700 White House
00:32:06.300 I would say
00:32:07.260 the odds of
00:32:07.800 that pretty
00:32:08.640 good.
00:32:09.860 Pretty good.
00:32:11.580 But if you
00:32:12.880 say to me
00:32:13.380 that over
00:32:13.780 that four
00:32:14.420 year term
00:32:15.120 just this
00:32:16.220 one week
00:32:17.020 where Hunter
00:32:18.200 the story
00:32:18.800 was that
00:32:19.160 Hunter's
00:32:19.500 back in the
00:32:19.960 White House
00:32:20.300 just that
00:32:20.680 one week
00:32:21.280 that's the
00:32:22.520 week that
00:32:24.000 he left
00:32:24.480 right after
00:32:25.220 his plea
00:32:25.620 deal.
00:32:26.280 That's the
00:32:26.860 week he's
00:32:27.220 going to
00:32:27.380 leave a
00:32:27.660 bag of
00:32:28.020 cocaine in
00:32:28.520 the White
00:32:28.760 House.
00:32:30.220 You're
00:32:30.700 going to
00:32:30.820 accept that
00:32:31.300 coincidence?
00:32:32.540 Because that
00:32:33.220 coincidence is
00:32:34.300 galactic in
00:32:35.760 size.
00:32:36.800 You know
00:32:37.100 that right?
00:32:37.600 That's like
00:32:38.120 a one in
00:32:38.540 thousand.
00:32:39.620 So I think
00:32:40.040 there's a
00:32:40.360 one in
00:32:40.660 one thousand
00:32:41.180 chance it's
00:32:41.880 a coincidence.
00:32:43.440 So it
00:32:43.920 wouldn't be
00:32:44.380 unusual for
00:32:45.080 him to
00:32:45.320 leave a
00:32:45.680 bag of
00:32:46.040 drugs.
00:32:46.700 We all
00:32:47.120 agree with
00:32:47.540 that right?
00:32:48.520 If I
00:32:48.880 said four
00:32:49.440 years has
00:32:50.900 Hunter ever
00:32:52.000 left a
00:32:52.420 drug in
00:32:52.780 the White
00:32:53.020 House?
00:32:53.940 Most of
00:32:54.480 you would
00:32:54.720 probably say
00:32:55.340 maybe.
00:32:56.440 Like good
00:32:57.080 chance.
00:32:58.140 At least
00:32:58.540 once.
00:33:00.040 But then I
00:33:00.560 narrow that
00:33:01.020 four years
00:33:02.160 down to that
00:33:02.680 one week.
00:33:03.560 The one
00:33:04.160 worst time
00:33:05.240 it could have
00:33:05.680 happened.
00:33:06.300 No worse
00:33:07.360 time than
00:33:07.900 this one
00:33:08.360 week.
00:33:08.600 And that's
00:33:08.860 the week
00:33:09.060 you did
00:33:09.320 it, right?
00:33:10.600 Sorry.
00:33:12.020 Sorry.
00:33:13.400 Two on
00:33:13.840 the nose.
00:33:15.860 I think it
00:33:16.680 was planted.
00:33:19.720 Boom.
00:33:21.200 All right.
00:33:23.020 I would not,
00:33:23.720 let's say,
00:33:24.180 I'll put a,
00:33:24.780 let me put a
00:33:26.640 percentage
00:33:27.500 confidence on
00:33:28.800 that.
00:33:29.020 60%.
00:33:30.020 60%.
00:33:30.500 60%.
00:33:32.820 40%.
00:33:34.240 It's just
00:33:35.120 some person
00:33:36.340 who dropped
00:33:36.740 some drugs.
00:33:38.660 Yeah.
00:33:38.920 40% is
00:33:39.760 something
00:33:40.020 completely
00:33:40.500 ordinary.
00:33:42.100 60%.
00:33:42.740 That's too
00:33:43.240 much of a
00:33:43.660 coincidence.
00:33:45.180 Too much
00:33:45.480 of a
00:33:45.700 coincidence.
00:33:49.520 Coke addicts
00:33:50.400 do it for 0.91
00:33:50.740 white.
00:33:51.000 No, I'm not
00:33:51.520 saying the
00:33:53.560 Hunter only
00:33:54.240 did one
00:33:54.720 week of
00:33:55.180 Coke.
00:33:55.620 did you
00:33:57.000 hear that?
00:33:58.280 No, we
00:33:58.780 assume that
00:33:59.420 addicts are
00:34:00.080 addicts.
00:34:02.320 It's like
00:34:02.940 you've never
00:34:03.280 heard of an
00:34:03.720 addict.
00:34:04.460 An addict
00:34:04.840 is somebody
00:34:05.260 who always
00:34:05.960 could do
00:34:06.320 Coke, no
00:34:07.280 matter how
00:34:07.720 long they've
00:34:08.260 not been
00:34:08.780 doing it.
00:34:09.900 That's what
00:34:10.400 an addict
00:34:10.760 is.
00:34:11.140 Somebody
00:34:11.360 who's just
00:34:13.020 sort of
00:34:13.340 reflexively
00:34:14.060 can drop
00:34:14.600 into that
00:34:15.040 without much
00:34:15.520 effort.
00:34:17.900 All right.
00:34:18.360 So it
00:34:18.980 could be
00:34:19.300 exactly what
00:34:19.860 happened.
00:34:20.680 So let
00:34:21.360 me say
00:34:22.260 clearly, it
00:34:23.780 could be
00:34:24.240 Hunter's
00:34:24.720 Wheat.
00:34:25.100 It could
00:34:25.400 be Hunter's
00:34:26.060 Coke.
00:34:27.080 It could
00:34:27.460 be somebody
00:34:27.900 else's.
00:34:29.200 I just
00:34:29.660 think there's
00:34:30.080 a slightly
00:34:30.620 more chance
00:34:31.340 that that
00:34:31.720 coincidence is
00:34:32.520 not a
00:34:32.840 coincidence.
00:34:34.140 You have
00:34:34.500 to believe
00:34:34.840 in a lot
00:34:35.280 of coincidence
00:34:35.800 for that
00:34:36.560 to be the
00:34:37.620 case.
00:34:39.280 All right.
00:34:41.660 Where is
00:34:42.380 Pregosian?
00:34:43.700 So today,
00:34:44.560 finally, CNN
00:34:45.300 and Reuters
00:34:46.200 and others,
00:34:47.700 Wall Street
00:34:48.080 Journal, have
00:34:48.620 decided that
00:34:49.480 now they
00:34:50.600 can say,
00:34:51.820 hey, I
00:34:53.800 thought we
00:34:54.220 would have
00:34:54.520 seen a picture
00:34:55.040 of him in
00:34:55.620 Belarus by
00:34:56.480 now.
00:34:58.880 And then
00:34:59.540 the Belarusian
00:35:00.680 leader,
00:35:02.000 Louchenko,
00:35:03.300 finally said
00:35:04.120 directly, he's
00:35:04.960 not in
00:35:05.300 Belarus.
00:35:07.060 Said it
00:35:07.480 directly, he's
00:35:08.540 not in
00:35:08.820 Belarus.
00:35:09.600 He thought he
00:35:10.060 might be in
00:35:10.500 St.
00:35:10.760 Petersburg,
00:35:11.380 unless he's
00:35:11.900 already gone
00:35:12.300 to Moscow.
00:35:14.340 Yeah.
00:35:14.980 Because I'm
00:35:15.640 sure that
00:35:16.860 Pregosian would 1.00
00:35:17.580 feel pretty
00:35:18.480 safe in
00:35:19.000 Moscow,
00:35:19.340 wouldn't he?
00:35:20.460 Wouldn't he?
00:35:20.940 No, he's
00:35:23.520 not.
00:35:23.700 I don't
00:35:23.940 know if
00:35:24.220 he's dead
00:35:24.680 because Putin 0.95
00:35:25.980 needs him
00:35:26.360 alive to
00:35:26.900 find out
00:35:27.280 who the
00:35:27.580 other
00:35:27.800 plotters
00:35:28.300 were.
00:35:29.160 So part
00:35:29.640 of the
00:35:29.860 story is
00:35:30.460 there are
00:35:30.660 lots of
00:35:30.980 plotters.
00:35:32.140 Now,
00:35:33.080 the reason
00:35:35.580 I do this
00:35:36.260 live stream,
00:35:37.380 besides the
00:35:38.060 fun of it,
00:35:38.620 which is
00:35:38.940 maybe the
00:35:39.500 biggest reason,
00:35:40.580 is that I
00:35:42.160 like to make
00:35:42.700 predictions,
00:35:43.740 especially
00:35:44.220 predictions that
00:35:45.020 are not being
00:35:45.500 made by the
00:35:46.220 others.
00:35:46.520 And then
00:35:48.080 you judge
00:35:49.240 the quality
00:35:49.800 of my
00:35:50.160 live streams,
00:35:51.000 or you
00:35:51.340 should,
00:35:52.380 by how
00:35:52.840 often I
00:35:53.320 get a
00:35:53.600 prediction
00:35:53.880 right.
00:35:55.500 Tell me
00:35:55.980 who else
00:35:56.520 said the
00:35:57.440 Pregosian
00:35:57.960 did not
00:35:58.440 go to
00:35:58.740 Belarus.
00:35:59.520 Name
00:35:59.720 one other
00:36:00.060 person.
00:36:00.840 Name
00:36:01.160 one other
00:36:01.600 person in
00:36:02.260 the entire
00:36:02.840 world,
00:36:04.020 let's say
00:36:04.520 who does
00:36:04.880 this,
00:36:05.720 does a
00:36:06.200 public
00:36:06.600 kind of
00:36:06.980 thing.
00:36:07.580 Not
00:36:07.880 one.
00:36:09.780 Posobiec?
00:36:10.860 Yeah,
00:36:11.220 okay.
00:36:12.680 Jack probably
00:36:13.520 was on it
00:36:13.960 early,
00:36:14.360 I'll give
00:36:14.680 you that.
00:36:16.520 All right,
00:36:18.800 so finally,
00:36:22.680 finally the
00:36:23.580 mainstream
00:36:24.020 media caught
00:36:25.620 up to a
00:36:26.320 guy on
00:36:26.760 Twitter who
00:36:27.440 just looks
00:36:27.920 at it and
00:36:28.280 says,
00:36:28.560 well,
00:36:28.760 obviously,
00:36:29.980 obviously
00:36:30.540 Putin can't
00:36:31.480 let him
00:36:31.760 go.
00:36:32.920 He's got to
00:36:33.460 keep him
00:36:33.860 until he
00:36:34.220 finds out
00:36:34.660 who the
00:36:34.940 other
00:36:35.160 traders are.
00:36:35.940 Of course.
00:36:36.800 That's just
00:36:37.240 basic
00:36:37.680 dictatoring.
00:36:39.440 Like,
00:36:39.680 that's the
00:36:39.980 most,
00:36:40.780 that's got
00:36:41.480 to be like
00:36:41.940 dictator 101.
00:36:44.620 First you
00:36:45.260 get a hold
00:36:45.700 of your
00:36:45.940 critic,
00:36:46.520 and then
00:36:47.120 you find
00:36:47.520 out what
00:36:47.920 else the
00:36:48.340 critic knows
00:36:49.020 that you
00:36:49.340 need to
00:36:49.660 know,
00:36:50.020 and then 1.00
00:36:50.300 you kill 1.00
00:36:50.680 them. 1.00
00:36:51.440 It's like
00:36:51.820 just basic.
00:36:52.740 It's the
00:36:52.980 most basic
00:36:53.580 dictatoring you
00:36:54.380 could do.
00:36:54.980 I'll tell you
00:36:55.420 what you
00:36:55.680 don't do.
00:36:57.000 Lushenko
00:36:57.400 was funny.
00:36:58.700 Lushenko
00:36:59.080 said it's 0.81
00:36:59.660 ridiculous to
00:37:00.420 imagine that 0.99
00:37:01.560 Putin would
00:37:02.080 want to get
00:37:02.540 revenge on
00:37:03.380 Prigozhin for
00:37:04.360 just trying to 0.92
00:37:04.940 kill him and 1.00
00:37:05.380 take over the 1.00
00:37:05.820 country.
00:37:07.100 I mean,
00:37:08.100 Putin?
00:37:09.360 Putin's not
00:37:09.960 kind of a
00:37:10.640 revengeful guy.
00:37:12.320 I mean,
00:37:12.740 what history do
00:37:13.580 we have of
00:37:14.100 Putin ever
00:37:14.660 trying to
00:37:15.700 attack a
00:37:16.240 critic?
00:37:20.140 It's just
00:37:20.840 funny listening
00:37:21.420 to the,
00:37:22.500 what would
00:37:24.380 you call
00:37:24.700 Lushenko?
00:37:25.880 Listening to
00:37:26.580 the puppets
00:37:27.260 talk.
00:37:28.620 It's hilariously
00:37:30.060 implausible,
00:37:31.500 anything they
00:37:32.180 say.
00:37:33.340 Even more so
00:37:34.240 than American 0.62
00:37:34.720 politics,
00:37:35.260 just hilariously
00:37:36.260 implausible.
00:37:36.900 All right,
00:37:38.820 so just
00:37:42.880 remember this
00:37:44.000 story.
00:37:44.920 Remember the
00:37:45.680 part where
00:37:46.320 Scott, who
00:37:48.660 has zero
00:37:49.760 military or
00:37:52.180 geopolitical
00:37:53.160 experience,
00:37:54.120 you'd all
00:37:54.480 agree,
00:37:54.860 right?
00:37:55.460 No military
00:37:56.120 experience,
00:37:57.220 no geopolitical
00:37:58.380 experience,
00:37:59.140 but I'm the
00:37:59.660 only one who
00:38:00.040 got that
00:38:00.360 right.
00:38:01.460 And it's
00:38:01.860 not the
00:38:02.200 first time
00:38:02.780 I'm the
00:38:03.060 only one
00:38:03.360 who got
00:38:03.620 some things
00:38:04.100 right.
00:38:04.380 Now, I'm
00:38:05.380 saying this
00:38:05.900 partly to
00:38:06.640 brag, because
00:38:07.940 it's useful
00:38:08.480 for telling
00:38:09.500 people why
00:38:09.960 they should
00:38:10.260 watch the
00:38:10.660 show, but
00:38:11.980 it's going
00:38:12.800 to tie into
00:38:13.380 a point
00:38:14.080 that's
00:38:14.360 upcoming.
00:38:15.460 So just
00:38:15.740 put a
00:38:16.000 little tack
00:38:17.440 in that,
00:38:18.660 that I got
00:38:19.360 a few things
00:38:19.860 right, okay?
00:38:21.140 That'll come
00:38:21.560 back later.
00:38:23.060 All right,
00:38:23.340 let's talk
00:38:23.620 about Ukraine.
00:38:26.140 What did
00:38:26.900 I predict
00:38:27.560 is happening
00:38:29.280 with the
00:38:30.380 counter-offensive?
00:38:31.780 Do you
00:38:32.220 remember what
00:38:32.620 I said was
00:38:33.140 going to
00:38:33.340 happen with
00:38:34.300 the
00:38:34.440 counter-offensive?
00:38:37.140 I said
00:38:38.140 the war
00:38:38.860 is already
00:38:39.320 over, because
00:38:40.720 nobody's going
00:38:41.380 anywhere.
00:38:43.720 There's not
00:38:45.280 going to be
00:38:45.580 much land
00:38:46.200 that's traded
00:38:46.800 after this
00:38:47.480 point, unless
00:38:48.080 it's by
00:38:48.440 negotiation.
00:38:50.020 I said
00:38:50.880 the war
00:38:51.300 is over,
00:38:51.840 we're into
00:38:52.200 the hard
00:38:52.600 negotiation that
00:38:54.120 happens to
00:38:54.700 involve killing
00:38:55.460 each other.
00:38:56.740 But neither
00:38:57.800 side can win.
00:39:00.200 The winning
00:39:00.880 is just off
00:39:01.700 the table.
00:39:02.720 So the
00:39:03.100 news has
00:39:03.540 finally caught
00:39:04.100 up to
00:39:04.380 me.
00:39:05.440 Now, have
00:39:05.740 I mentioned
00:39:06.160 that I have
00:39:06.660 no military
00:39:07.360 experience?
00:39:08.240 I think I
00:39:08.900 did, just a
00:39:09.480 minute ago.
00:39:10.860 No military
00:39:11.840 experience, but
00:39:13.000 I told you
00:39:13.640 weeks ago,
00:39:14.660 there's no
00:39:15.160 war.
00:39:16.360 They're
00:39:16.720 basically in
00:39:17.700 place, and
00:39:19.060 they're just
00:39:19.380 waiting for a
00:39:20.020 Republican
00:39:20.360 president or
00:39:21.200 something.
00:39:22.520 But it's
00:39:23.660 not really
00:39:24.260 going to
00:39:24.680 change any,
00:39:25.960 you know,
00:39:26.280 no leadership
00:39:27.120 looks like it's
00:39:27.860 going to
00:39:28.100 change, no
00:39:29.180 property looks
00:39:29.900 like it's much
00:39:30.460 going to
00:39:30.720 change, and
00:39:31.320 that's what the
00:39:31.780 news is
00:39:32.120 reporting.
00:39:33.200 So the
00:39:33.800 news has
00:39:34.180 caught up
00:39:34.520 with me, and
00:39:35.680 they're saying,
00:39:36.340 ah, looks like
00:39:37.000 a stalemate.
00:39:38.540 The Russians 0.95
00:39:39.460 did too good a
00:39:40.240 job of digging
00:39:40.780 in.
00:39:41.600 The Ukrainians,
00:39:42.460 of course, say
00:39:43.100 they don't have
00:39:43.680 the weapons they
00:39:44.880 need.
00:39:46.240 Blah, blah,
00:39:46.980 blah.
00:39:47.560 All right.
00:39:47.900 So I saw a
00:39:48.900 tweet by David
00:39:50.120 Sachs, again, if
00:39:52.720 you don't follow
00:39:53.420 David Sachs on
00:39:54.940 Twitter, you're
00:39:55.500 missing a lot,
00:39:56.920 because he's got
00:39:57.500 some good
00:39:57.940 contrarian takes,
00:39:59.880 contrarian against
00:40:01.360 the, let's say,
00:40:02.700 the military
00:40:03.240 industrial complex,
00:40:05.400 contrarian against
00:40:06.540 them.
00:40:07.440 So he notes that
00:40:08.500 there's this
00:40:09.080 colonel in the
00:40:09.940 Australian Armed
00:40:10.580 Forces who's
00:40:11.500 involved in the
00:40:12.060 Ukrainian stuff,
00:40:13.920 and he makes
00:40:15.220 three points.
00:40:15.960 The offensive has
00:40:16.780 failed.
00:40:17.900 So that's from
00:40:19.420 somebody who's
00:40:19.940 there.
00:40:20.900 Somebody on our
00:40:21.820 side, you know,
00:40:22.680 NATO, says the
00:40:24.820 offensive has
00:40:25.400 failed.
00:40:26.340 Not that it's just
00:40:27.380 starting, not that
00:40:28.360 we're seeing the
00:40:28.980 beginning, not that
00:40:30.700 if they keep pushing
00:40:31.720 it'll be good.
00:40:32.800 It just failed.
00:40:34.860 So basically,
00:40:37.340 according to this
00:40:37.960 colonel, who is
00:40:39.340 involved, it
00:40:41.340 failed.
00:40:42.520 Now, of course,
00:40:43.440 Zelensky say,
00:40:44.600 we're just getting
00:40:45.200 started.
00:40:46.360 So Zelensky is
00:40:47.140 sort of like that
00:40:47.740 night in, you
00:40:49.200 know, Monty
00:40:49.640 Python, after his
00:40:51.040 arms and legs get
00:40:51.920 caught off.
00:40:53.500 Come on here, I'm
00:40:54.840 just getting started.
00:40:56.680 Number two, this is
00:40:58.640 from the, remember,
00:40:59.620 this is from somebody
00:41:00.460 in NATO.
00:41:01.820 NATO military
00:41:02.700 tactics do not
00:41:03.820 work against Russian 0.78
00:41:04.760 defenses.
00:41:08.200 What?
00:41:10.940 Wait, what?
00:41:11.760 That's exactly what
00:41:14.260 Sachs tweeted.
00:41:16.720 Wait, what?
00:41:19.120 Doesn't that get your
00:41:20.160 attention?
00:41:21.560 NATO tactics don't
00:41:22.960 work against Russian 0.78
00:41:24.020 defenses, at least on
00:41:25.920 the ground.
00:41:27.380 Wow.
00:41:29.820 And then, number
00:41:31.160 three, the colonel
00:41:32.280 expects limited
00:41:33.220 successes along the
00:41:34.480 front line, but no
00:41:36.100 major breakthroughs.
00:41:38.220 None.
00:41:38.640 No breakthroughs.
00:41:41.440 Just minor, a little,
00:41:42.440 you know, block
00:41:43.000 air block there.
00:41:44.460 So we're now at
00:41:45.660 exactly the place that
00:41:47.560 I told you we would
00:41:48.440 be.
00:41:50.880 How many of you would
00:41:52.060 be willing to say I
00:41:53.040 predicted that
00:41:53.700 correctly?
00:41:55.300 Right?
00:41:55.700 Again, the context is
00:41:57.640 not just my ego, which
00:41:59.880 I love, you know.
00:42:00.940 Anybody wants to say I
00:42:02.280 did well, I like that.
00:42:04.280 Everybody likes
00:42:05.020 compliments.
00:42:05.480 Everybody likes to be
00:42:06.540 right.
00:42:07.280 But a larger purpose
00:42:09.100 here is I want to show
00:42:10.780 you that non-experts can
00:42:12.440 be right.
00:42:14.080 Would you buy the, do
00:42:16.080 you buy at this point,
00:42:17.200 especially after the
00:42:18.000 pandemic, do you buy
00:42:19.840 the notion that non-
00:42:21.520 experts can completely
00:42:23.360 beat the experts and
00:42:25.120 routinely?
00:42:26.260 It's not even unusual.
00:42:27.760 And it's not something
00:42:28.740 limited to me.
00:42:30.180 I know you can agree with
00:42:31.460 that, right?
00:42:32.220 I'm not the one person
00:42:33.740 who did better than the
00:42:35.240 experts.
00:42:36.240 I'm one of many people
00:42:38.360 who did better than the
00:42:40.060 experts.
00:42:40.720 Many of us.
00:42:41.880 That's the bigger story.
00:42:42.940 It's not about me.
00:42:44.420 Right?
00:42:44.580 The bigger story is that 1.00
00:42:45.580 the experts are garbage. 1.00
00:42:47.520 So after David Sachs 1.00
00:42:49.460 tweets this, pointing
00:42:50.780 out that it was this
00:42:52.240 colonel in the
00:42:53.400 Australian, oh, I'm
00:42:54.880 sorry, I kept saying
00:42:55.680 Australian, Austrian.
00:42:57.980 So correct everything I
00:42:59.820 said.
00:43:00.080 It's Austrian, not 1.00
00:43:01.260 Australian.
00:43:01.680 Austrian armed
00:43:03.640 forces, which would
00:43:05.680 explain why he's in
00:43:06.400 NATO.
00:43:07.600 Makes a lot more sense
00:43:08.680 now.
00:43:09.880 If you get rid of the
00:43:10.900 Australian part, it 0.76
00:43:11.720 makes a little more
00:43:12.220 sense.
00:43:12.700 Wait, is Australia in
00:43:13.960 NATO?
00:43:17.500 Austria is not in
00:43:18.500 NATO?
00:43:19.320 What is Australia
00:43:19.860 is?
00:43:22.280 Do me some quick
00:43:23.780 fact-checking.
00:43:27.120 Neither is.
00:43:28.180 Somebody says
00:43:28.740 neither.
00:43:29.100 Well, somehow this
00:43:32.140 colonel is involved in
00:43:33.380 some way.
00:43:34.160 So I guess I don't know
00:43:34.880 the details, but he
00:43:35.660 sounds like he knows
00:43:36.280 what he's talking
00:43:36.720 about.
00:43:37.920 So after David Sachs
00:43:39.460 makes this tweet, in
00:43:40.520 which he's literally
00:43:41.340 quoting this colonel,
00:43:43.860 somebody named Aki
00:43:45.800 Kako tweets back and
00:43:47.940 replies to David Sachs.
00:43:49.180 He goes, and I'd like
00:43:50.540 to do this with as much
00:43:51.560 attitude as the tweet
00:43:53.400 seems to have.
00:43:54.140 So to get the right
00:43:55.520 attitude, I'd like to
00:43:58.180 invite Dale to join
00:44:00.640 us.
00:44:02.260 Dale, could you read
00:44:03.800 the tweet by Aki
00:44:05.320 Kako?
00:44:07.420 Glad to do it.
00:44:11.600 David, no, Dale,
00:44:13.920 could you, more
00:44:14.940 condescending.
00:44:16.460 We need lots of
00:44:17.660 condescending.
00:44:18.920 More condescending.
00:44:19.980 Got it.
00:44:20.520 Got it.
00:44:20.800 All right, how
00:44:24.580 about this?
00:44:26.320 David, I am curious
00:44:28.660 to learn about your
00:44:31.240 extensive military
00:44:33.080 background and the
00:44:34.340 comprehensive range of
00:44:36.020 your military experience.
00:44:40.880 Could you kindly share
00:44:42.580 with me the specific
00:44:44.700 details, the specific
00:44:46.260 details and noteworthy
00:44:48.000 aspects of your time
00:44:49.420 serving in the military?
00:44:50.800 Bingo.
00:44:54.400 Zing. 0.88
00:44:55.500 Zing. 0.88
00:44:56.640 Got him.
00:45:06.100 To which my
00:45:07.980 response was,
00:45:10.180 there's still people
00:45:11.760 who believe the
00:45:12.400 experts?
00:45:16.020 Let's form a
00:45:16.960 contest.
00:45:18.140 And the contest
00:45:18.820 will be this.
00:45:19.540 It will be a
00:45:20.800 betting forum
00:45:21.700 for things in
00:45:23.480 the future.
00:45:25.080 All right, it's a
00:45:25.460 betting forum.
00:45:26.380 And you only get
00:45:27.220 two bets,
00:45:28.900 two possibilities.
00:45:30.160 You either bet
00:45:31.160 that the military
00:45:32.480 industrial complex
00:45:33.560 is telling you the
00:45:34.300 truth on some
00:45:35.260 specific issue,
00:45:36.640 or you bet that
00:45:37.720 David Sachs has a
00:45:39.280 more accurate take.
00:45:40.200 and there's lots of
00:45:43.660 different iterations,
00:45:44.360 lots of different
00:45:45.120 bets.
00:45:46.880 Now, I'm not going to
00:45:47.900 say that David Sachs
00:45:48.760 will be right on every
00:45:49.980 take.
00:45:50.860 Nobody is.
00:45:52.580 But do you really
00:45:53.660 think he's not
00:45:54.360 killing the experts?
00:45:56.580 He's been destroying
00:45:57.980 the experts.
00:45:59.620 Just that one person.
00:46:01.580 He's been destroying
00:46:02.800 the experts on a whole
00:46:04.360 bunch of stuff.
00:46:05.540 It's not just the
00:46:06.440 Ukraine war.
00:46:07.100 He's been more
00:46:08.540 right than people
00:46:09.540 have a right to be
00:46:10.320 right about anything.
00:46:13.720 How do people not
00:46:15.060 notice?
00:46:16.520 How do you not
00:46:17.040 notice that there's
00:46:17.800 somebody who's just
00:46:18.380 right all the time?
00:46:19.580 Just like consistently
00:46:20.480 right.
00:46:21.300 And the experts are
00:46:22.600 like, whoa.
00:46:25.600 It's a weird world.
00:46:27.340 All right.
00:46:27.600 You were probably
00:46:30.860 aware that until
00:46:31.880 the Supreme Court's
00:46:33.080 more recent rulings
00:46:34.380 that the Supreme
00:46:36.560 Court would be an
00:46:37.140 issue in the 2024
00:46:37.980 election because of
00:46:39.900 abortion and Roe
00:46:42.120 versus Wade.
00:46:43.560 And you think that
00:46:44.600 will still be fresh
00:46:45.500 and the Democrats
00:46:46.260 will make a big deal
00:46:47.080 about it, because
00:46:48.140 they did in the
00:46:50.140 prior election.
00:46:51.420 So we kind of
00:46:52.180 expect that.
00:46:53.540 But I saw a good
00:46:55.280 warning.
00:46:56.160 I think it was in
00:46:57.020 the Wall Street
00:46:57.580 Journal, an opinion
00:46:58.420 piece, that the
00:47:02.100 Democrats better be 0.75
00:47:03.040 careful if they take
00:47:04.480 on the Supreme
00:47:05.140 Court, because the
00:47:06.680 Supreme Court's vote
00:47:07.800 on affirmative action
00:47:09.160 is actually popular,
00:47:11.940 like the majority of
00:47:12.920 the country agrees
00:47:13.700 with the Supreme
00:47:14.300 Court.
00:47:14.580 and the ruling
00:47:16.540 on student loan
00:47:18.220 relief is also
00:47:20.240 favored by a
00:47:21.600 majority, that,
00:47:23.300 you know, not
00:47:23.760 doing it.
00:47:24.820 And, more to the
00:47:26.200 point, the people
00:47:27.920 who are most
00:47:28.600 against student
00:47:30.060 loan forgiveness
00:47:30.720 were older
00:47:31.580 public, you know,
00:47:33.280 part of the public
00:47:33.820 that's older, and
00:47:35.380 they're more likely
00:47:35.940 to vote.
00:47:37.200 So it turns out
00:47:38.240 that the abortion
00:47:40.380 issue, I think,
00:47:41.340 is going to get a
00:47:42.120 little bit stale
00:47:43.180 by 2024.
00:47:45.920 Because the
00:47:47.880 Republicans have
00:47:48.640 the ultimate
00:47:49.100 answer to that.
00:47:50.940 We kicked it to
00:47:52.220 the states, so it's
00:47:53.460 closer to you, the
00:47:54.520 individual.
00:47:55.740 You want the
00:47:56.500 decision to be as
00:47:57.400 close to the
00:47:58.020 individual as
00:47:58.640 possible, and while
00:48:00.340 we certainly have
00:48:01.060 opinions about what
00:48:02.100 should and should
00:48:02.680 not be legal, we
00:48:03.980 think the federal
00:48:04.640 government should get
00:48:05.460 out of it.
00:48:06.540 So you're not
00:48:07.320 really arguing about
00:48:08.120 abortion.
00:48:08.480 you're arguing
00:48:10.120 about whether you
00:48:10.980 should make the
00:48:11.520 decision close to
00:48:12.940 the public or
00:48:13.700 farther from the
00:48:14.440 public.
00:48:15.880 That's our only
00:48:16.720 point.
00:48:17.380 So this would be
00:48:17.900 the Republican
00:48:18.440 take.
00:48:19.160 The only thing
00:48:19.900 we're asking is
00:48:21.400 that you get more
00:48:22.200 involved in your
00:48:22.900 own decisions.
00:48:25.060 Get more involved
00:48:26.340 in your own life.
00:48:28.280 That's what we're
00:48:28.920 asking.
00:48:29.880 We're asking that
00:48:30.640 you don't let the
00:48:31.260 federal government
00:48:31.960 make decisions that
00:48:32.940 you should be
00:48:33.400 making.
00:48:34.380 Make it as close
00:48:35.420 to your local
00:48:36.260 government as you
00:48:37.660 can, and then
00:48:38.740 you're going to
00:48:39.100 feel the most
00:48:39.580 comfortable with
00:48:40.300 it, and people
00:48:41.280 will get different
00:48:41.860 answers in different
00:48:42.540 states.
00:48:43.440 Now that's a pretty
00:48:44.380 good defense.
00:48:46.280 I haven't heard any
00:48:47.100 Republicans say it
00:48:47.940 the way I said it.
00:48:49.020 They do say it, but
00:48:50.400 they don't say it
00:48:51.000 cleanly, and they
00:48:52.200 don't package it
00:48:53.420 well.
00:48:54.600 But it's a perfect
00:48:55.780 defense because it
00:48:57.600 actually gives people
00:48:58.440 more of what they
00:48:59.180 want instead of less,
00:49:00.260 or at least you
00:49:00.740 can phrase it like
00:49:03.320 that.
00:49:04.500 You can still have
00:49:05.400 your abortion.
00:49:05.880 You might have to
00:49:07.500 move to a state
00:49:09.540 where people agree
00:49:10.280 with you, but if
00:49:11.760 you live in a state
00:49:12.500 where the people
00:49:13.020 around you don't
00:49:13.960 want it, is that
00:49:16.560 our problem?
00:49:17.780 Is that the federal
00:49:18.760 government's problem
00:49:19.600 that your neighbors
00:49:20.540 don't like abortion?
00:49:23.580 It's a pretty easy
00:49:24.720 sell that you need
00:49:26.080 to work it out at
00:49:26.760 the state level, and
00:49:27.860 that that's all the
00:49:28.900 Supreme Court did.
00:49:29.740 In my opinion, that
00:49:30.520 is all they did.
00:49:31.660 I don't think they
00:49:32.500 ruled on abortion
00:49:33.240 whatsoever.
00:49:33.920 They just said
00:49:36.860 whose authority it
00:49:37.900 was.
00:49:38.800 So, I do think
00:49:41.460 that the Supreme
00:49:42.180 Court, which I
00:49:42.980 thought was going
00:49:43.620 to be the biggest
00:49:44.300 problem for
00:49:45.240 Republicans, might
00:49:46.880 have actually
00:49:47.360 reversed in terms
00:49:48.560 of its impact if
00:49:51.560 the Republicans can,
00:49:54.040 let's say, elegantly
00:49:55.240 handle the abortion 0.98
00:49:56.200 question.
00:49:57.120 And they should,
00:49:58.520 because it's right
00:49:59.100 there.
00:49:59.540 I mean, it's right
00:50:00.100 there for them to
00:50:00.720 take.
00:50:01.080 It's free money.
00:50:01.820 It's just sitting on
00:50:02.440 the table.
00:50:02.800 You just have to
00:50:03.940 pick it up.
00:50:05.160 Don't tell us what
00:50:06.040 you think about a
00:50:07.220 fetus.
00:50:08.380 Do not care. 0.66
00:50:09.860 The best thing that
00:50:10.700 Trump could say about
00:50:11.520 this, or let's say
00:50:12.520 any Republican is,
00:50:14.200 why do you care about
00:50:15.320 my opinion about
00:50:16.200 abortion? 0.89
00:50:17.680 I care about your
00:50:18.740 opinion about abortion.
00:50:20.380 Oh, that's good. 1.00
00:50:22.140 Shit, that's good. 1.00
00:50:24.820 Imagine you being 1.00
00:50:25.660 president, and you
00:50:26.260 say, why do you care
00:50:27.100 about my opinion of
00:50:28.060 abortion? 0.89
00:50:28.580 You should care about
00:50:29.360 yours, because that's
00:50:30.140 what I care about.
00:50:30.800 I care about your
00:50:32.120 opinion about abortion.
00:50:33.600 I'm not going to have
00:50:34.320 a baby.
00:50:36.080 Now, look at me.
00:50:37.560 I'm not going to have
00:50:38.220 a baby, but you
00:50:39.140 might.
00:50:40.160 Your opinion on
00:50:40.940 abortion is critical
00:50:42.200 and vital to me.
00:50:44.760 My opinion on
00:50:45.640 abortion should be 0.90
00:50:46.440 zero interest to you
00:50:47.560 from the federal
00:50:48.620 government.
00:50:49.940 Work it out at the
00:50:50.600 state.
00:50:51.680 Isn't that strong?
00:50:53.660 Now, that's, you
00:50:54.640 know, sort of
00:50:55.180 political narrative-y,
00:50:57.300 persuasion-y.
00:50:58.060 I mean, it's not
00:50:58.720 based on truth, per
00:51:00.080 se.
00:51:00.620 It's just persuasion.
00:51:02.880 But you would love
00:51:04.080 any politician who
00:51:05.200 said, stop asking my
00:51:06.560 opinion about your
00:51:07.360 body.
00:51:08.860 Oh, that's even
00:51:09.840 better.
00:51:10.600 Oh, my God, that's
00:51:11.300 even better.
00:51:12.360 Stop asking my
00:51:13.460 opinion about your
00:51:14.440 body.
00:51:16.360 That's the end of
00:51:17.340 it.
00:51:18.200 That would end the
00:51:19.180 debate.
00:51:20.540 Stop asking my
00:51:21.560 opinion about your
00:51:22.420 body.
00:51:23.940 Wow.
00:51:24.340 Wow.
00:51:24.400 Yeah, that
00:51:28.860 dropped a few
00:51:29.460 mics, didn't it?
00:51:31.380 That is really
00:51:32.320 strong, isn't it?
00:51:33.460 Let me just pause
00:51:34.720 here and ask you.
00:51:36.200 In my mind, that
00:51:37.500 sounded like insanely
00:51:38.580 strong.
00:51:40.000 Did you feel it?
00:51:42.180 Did you feel that
00:51:43.200 as persuasive?
00:51:46.660 Not really.
00:51:47.940 Some yes, some no.
00:51:49.920 Now, persuasion, of
00:51:50.920 course, doesn't need
00:51:51.560 to get y'all.
00:51:53.140 Right?
00:51:53.420 It doesn't work
00:51:53.940 that way.
00:51:54.660 You're only trying
00:51:55.420 to pick off the
00:51:56.100 5% that might be
00:51:57.300 persuadable.
00:51:59.420 Women never forget 1.00
00:52:00.480 rights taken.
00:52:02.300 Yeah, well, that's
00:52:03.060 certainly the pro-abortion
00:52:06.300 people are going to
00:52:07.460 phrase it as a right
00:52:08.920 taken away.
00:52:10.320 But I think it's too
00:52:11.580 easy to answer that.
00:52:15.060 That it's a right
00:52:16.120 that's driven down
00:52:17.380 to you.
00:52:19.720 I'm giving you more
00:52:20.800 control over your
00:52:21.560 rights.
00:52:21.860 That is what Trump
00:52:26.200 has been saying?
00:52:27.340 Yeah, I don't think
00:52:27.960 he says it as well
00:52:28.620 as I said it.
00:52:31.080 All right.
00:52:33.620 Let me give you an
00:52:34.400 update on global
00:52:35.200 warming.
00:52:37.940 There are two things
00:52:38.920 happening with global
00:52:39.740 warming at the same
00:52:40.540 time.
00:52:40.900 And these are both
00:52:42.040 confirmed.
00:52:43.540 The planet's getting
00:52:44.680 warmer and the planet
00:52:45.860 is cooling off.
00:52:47.920 Confirmed.
00:52:48.440 So there are two
00:52:49.920 things I know for
00:52:50.700 sure is that the
00:52:52.720 planet is getting
00:52:53.480 warmer and also
00:52:54.360 colder at the same
00:52:55.240 time.
00:52:56.120 And I know that
00:52:57.040 because of data.
00:52:58.640 So I've looked into
00:52:59.700 it.
00:52:59.960 I've done a deep
00:53:00.480 dive.
00:53:01.360 I've checked the
00:53:01.980 data.
00:53:02.740 And as of today,
00:53:03.840 the Wall Street
00:53:04.320 Journal, which is not
00:53:06.080 noted for its left
00:53:07.260 leaning politics, the
00:53:09.400 Wall Street Journal is
00:53:10.320 reporting that we
00:53:11.980 reached a new global
00:53:14.300 high in temperature.
00:53:15.640 It's a new high.
00:53:18.780 And things are
00:53:20.500 getting warmer all
00:53:21.200 over the world.
00:53:22.660 If you go to
00:53:23.960 Twitter and just put
00:53:26.260 in climate change,
00:53:27.440 you'll find very
00:53:28.400 credible people telling
00:53:29.600 you exactly the
00:53:30.560 opposite, and they'll
00:53:31.420 show you data.
00:53:32.740 And they'll even show
00:53:33.700 you official data.
00:53:34.600 They'll show you data
00:53:35.260 from the people who
00:53:35.960 claim that climate
00:53:38.640 change is an
00:53:39.580 emergency.
00:53:40.280 They'll use their own 1.00
00:53:41.240 data.
00:53:42.020 And they'll say,
00:53:42.880 here it is.
00:53:43.480 It's not true.
00:53:44.280 And then other
00:53:46.100 people will look at,
00:53:47.260 I guess, the same
00:53:48.040 data and say, there
00:53:48.880 it is.
00:53:49.200 It's true.
00:53:50.540 Yeah.
00:53:51.380 So I have no idea.
00:53:54.180 I don't even know how
00:53:55.200 you figure it out.
00:53:57.260 How do you know it's
00:53:58.140 true?
00:54:01.120 I don't know.
00:54:03.260 So I'll just, this is
00:54:05.880 maybe the most dangerous
00:54:06.900 thing for the planet is 0.99
00:54:09.580 that we can't tell.
00:54:11.180 Now, I happen to think
00:54:12.400 that no matter how
00:54:13.900 true or not true it
00:54:14.860 is, we're going to do
00:54:15.560 all the same things,
00:54:17.440 meaning that we're
00:54:18.080 going to, you know,
00:54:19.140 the free market still
00:54:21.220 rewards people if they
00:54:22.300 come up with a better
00:54:23.080 form of energy, or
00:54:24.480 even just a good enough
00:54:25.520 form of energy that you
00:54:26.460 could sell a lot of it.
00:54:27.740 So the free market
00:54:28.700 should be doing
00:54:29.400 everything it needs to
00:54:30.360 do to come up with
00:54:31.820 alternative forms of
00:54:33.100 energy, and it seems
00:54:34.540 like it is.
00:54:35.780 So probably we'll be
00:54:37.340 fine, whether it's
00:54:39.760 actually getting warmer
00:54:41.620 like the Wall Street
00:54:43.260 Journal reports today,
00:54:44.480 or it's not, as people
00:54:46.860 all over social media
00:54:47.900 like to tell you.
00:54:49.660 We're going to do the
00:54:50.400 same stuff.
00:54:51.440 Probably doesn't make
00:54:52.300 any difference at all.
00:54:54.140 Because we're so good at
00:54:55.560 remediating against,
00:54:59.240 you know, extremes,
00:55:00.740 everything from extreme
00:55:01.940 heat to extreme
00:55:03.260 everything else, we're
00:55:04.540 really good at it.
00:55:05.220 I think we'll, I think
00:55:07.480 we'll survive.
00:55:09.460 All right, DeSantis
00:55:10.240 campaign made a, I
00:55:13.180 think, a big gaffe.
00:55:15.100 You tell me.
00:55:17.640 So DeSantis tweeted, I
00:55:20.660 guess his campaign tweeted
00:55:23.120 an anti-LGBT, well, what
00:55:28.740 they tried to do, DeSantis
00:55:29.840 tried to make Trump look
00:55:32.700 like he was too
00:55:36.000 pro-LGBTQ, right?
00:55:39.800 DeSantis retweeted a
00:55:42.980 mean political ad
00:55:45.960 that tried to paint
00:55:50.560 Trump as a bad person
00:55:52.300 for being too supportive
00:55:54.400 of LGBTQ.
00:55:56.680 That actually happened
00:55:58.300 in American politics.
00:56:00.880 That really happened.
00:56:02.700 Oh my God.
00:56:05.140 That's such a mistake.
00:56:08.080 You know, Trump has
00:56:11.520 lived in the sort of
00:56:12.880 a Hollywood celebrity
00:56:15.300 world for most of his
00:56:17.040 adult life.
00:56:19.200 If you know anything
00:56:20.600 about the Hollywood,
00:56:22.180 you know, famous rich
00:56:23.800 people life, you know
00:56:25.920 it is just full of
00:56:27.720 LGBTQ people.
00:56:29.180 I would guess that
00:56:32.320 Trump is very
00:56:33.420 comfortable, certainly
00:56:34.580 the way he talks
00:56:35.360 about it, is very
00:56:36.440 comfortable with the
00:56:37.400 LGBT community and
00:56:40.160 is fully supportive of
00:56:43.040 them having a full and
00:56:44.440 free quality life.
00:56:47.060 So going against Trump
00:56:49.520 on this issue is maybe 1.00
00:56:51.080 the dumbest thing I've 1.00
00:56:52.000 ever seen. 1.00
00:56:52.500 Like, I get that there
00:56:55.420 are, you know, some
00:56:56.020 anti-LGBTQ people and
00:56:57.940 maybe they'll say, yeah,
00:56:59.400 DeSantis really goes
00:57:00.980 after him.
00:57:01.820 But if you tell me that
00:57:03.780 you're going to pick the
00:57:04.760 campaign who's going
00:57:05.700 after, going after a
00:57:09.140 segment of Americans?
00:57:10.340 What?
00:57:13.140 That doesn't work for me.
00:57:15.460 No, no.
00:57:17.200 It's one thing to say,
00:57:18.480 you know, progressive 0.96
00:57:19.580 politics are crazy.
00:57:21.420 It's one thing to say 0.71
00:57:22.400 AOC is crazy or, you 0.74
00:57:25.140 know, the politicians. 1.00
00:57:26.340 You can call them crazy. 0.99
00:57:27.840 That's fine. 0.71
00:57:28.820 But you don't go after
00:57:29.860 a segment of the
00:57:34.060 American public.
00:57:36.560 How does that make
00:57:37.600 sense?
00:57:38.380 How do you win an
00:57:39.100 election doing that?
00:57:40.340 That's pure Hillary. 1.00
00:57:42.180 That's like Hillary 1.00
00:57:42.920 Department.
00:57:44.300 You know, well, we got
00:57:45.140 these deplorables.
00:57:46.860 Wait, what?
00:57:49.000 What?
00:57:50.100 You just called a bunch
00:57:51.420 of law-abiding Americans
00:57:53.420 deplorable?
00:57:54.880 Did they break any laws?
00:57:56.620 Did they violate your
00:57:57.440 constitution?
00:57:59.020 Did they poop on your
00:58:00.000 lawn?
00:58:01.180 No, you don't do that if
00:58:02.540 you're running for
00:58:03.000 president.
00:58:04.080 If you're president,
00:58:05.180 everybody's cool.
00:58:06.680 That's got to be.
00:58:07.840 That's just got to be
00:58:08.640 the base.
00:58:09.860 Everybody's cool.
00:58:11.080 If you're following the
00:58:12.700 law, you know, we have
00:58:13.760 different opinions of
00:58:14.600 what law should be.
00:58:15.840 But everybody who's
00:58:16.720 following the law, you're
00:58:17.480 all cool.
00:58:18.740 Anything beyond that is 0.99
00:58:19.900 just fucked up. 1.00
00:58:21.140 That's just fucked up. 1.00
00:58:22.140 So I think DeSantis probably 0.99
00:58:24.080 just destroyed his chances
00:58:25.620 with that.
00:58:27.020 I don't know what chances
00:58:27.820 he had.
00:58:28.700 Now, would it be surprising
00:58:30.560 for you to learn that
00:58:32.520 Ramaswamy is picking up 0.91
00:58:34.160 polling steam?
00:58:36.780 So remember, Ramaswamy was
00:58:38.460 polling at like about
00:58:39.600 nothing, close to 2%, I
00:58:41.900 think in the beginning, 2% or
00:58:43.060 3%.
00:58:43.740 And DeSantis was around
00:58:46.280 20%.
00:58:47.100 Well, it depends what
00:58:48.580 poll you're looking at, and
00:58:49.620 I don't see the name of
00:58:50.420 this poll.
00:58:51.180 But allegedly, according to
00:58:54.060 The Hill, DeSantis is down
00:58:57.300 from 20 to 16, and Ramaswamy
00:59:00.240 is up to 10.
00:59:04.440 That's right.
00:59:05.120 So Vivek is, first of all,
00:59:12.780 taking strong positions on
00:59:14.860 stuff like fentanyl, very
00:59:16.940 strong.
00:59:17.500 But the brilliant thing he's
00:59:19.140 doing is he's going into the
00:59:20.640 enemy's cave and walking out
00:59:22.740 with their scalps.
00:59:25.520 He's walking into CNN, and he
00:59:27.860 walks out and he holds up a
00:59:29.580 scalp.
00:59:31.040 And then somebody else invites
00:59:32.300 him in, and he walks out with
00:59:34.340 a scalp.
00:59:36.080 It's really effective.
00:59:39.420 So he's not afraid of the
00:59:41.360 hardest argument.
00:59:42.980 He's going into the darkest
00:59:44.560 caves, and he's walking out
00:59:46.100 with a scalp.
00:59:47.360 He's doing it one time after
00:59:48.660 another.
00:59:49.220 And after a while, you can't
00:59:50.360 ignore it, right?
00:59:51.980 If he does it once, he got
00:59:53.160 lucky.
00:59:54.320 If he keeps doing it, if he
00:59:57.300 keeps doing it, you can't
00:59:58.900 ignore that.
01:00:01.320 And I don't really see him
01:00:04.300 generating what I would call
01:00:05.740 gaffes or, let's say, reasons
01:00:09.100 to not like him.
01:00:10.540 I mean, if you don't like his
01:00:11.580 policies, that's fair game.
01:00:13.580 But he's not giving you a
01:00:14.840 reason to dislike him.
01:00:17.320 And other politicians do.
01:00:18.980 They give you a reason to
01:00:19.980 dislike them.
01:00:21.080 He doesn't do that.
01:00:22.480 He just tells you what he
01:00:23.480 thinks will work.
01:00:24.240 He takes the role of a
01:00:27.760 patriot, the very best kind.
01:00:31.220 So he's impressing the hell
01:00:33.380 out of me.
01:00:34.260 Will he win?
01:00:35.120 We'll see.
01:00:36.160 Anything could happen.
01:00:37.460 He does have a path.
01:00:39.620 His path is to slightly pull
01:00:41.600 ahead of DeSantis, which looks
01:00:43.860 doable, believe it or not.
01:00:45.540 Actually, it looks doable.
01:00:47.100 He's within stretching distance.
01:00:49.340 If he can get into something
01:00:52.600 like a legitimate second place
01:00:54.780 race with DeSantis, and then
01:00:57.160 let's say something happens
01:00:58.520 with Trump.
01:00:59.900 Because when you talk about
01:01:01.200 Trump, something happens is
01:01:03.360 guaranteed.
01:01:04.920 Do you think Trump is going to
01:01:05.900 have no shocks or scandals or
01:01:09.980 be taken out of context again?
01:01:12.480 Of course he will.
01:01:13.980 The press will make up a new
01:01:16.160 story about Trump, and it will
01:01:17.780 be devastating, like all the
01:01:19.680 old stories they made up
01:01:20.800 about him.
01:01:21.720 And Vivek will just be sort
01:01:23.220 of unscathed, because they're
01:01:25.960 not going to put enough
01:01:26.680 attention on him.
01:01:28.360 So he might be just the only
01:01:30.400 unscathed Republican at some
01:01:33.900 point.
01:01:34.800 If that point is the right
01:01:36.300 point, he goes all the way.
01:01:39.720 So he does have a path.
01:01:41.460 I mean, it's narrow.
01:01:42.580 It's very narrow.
01:01:44.020 So it depends entirely upon
01:01:45.900 Trump.
01:01:46.300 So his fate is his own
01:01:49.400 against DeSantis.
01:01:50.980 Yeah, that's the best way to
01:01:52.020 say it.
01:01:52.580 So Vivek can completely
01:01:53.980 control his fate against the
01:01:55.660 other candidates.
01:01:57.360 He has complete control of
01:01:58.840 that.
01:01:59.600 He does not have control over
01:02:01.440 whether he could beat Trump.
01:02:03.440 Trump would have to take
01:02:04.640 himself out, or the Democrats
01:02:06.240 would have to finally succeed.
01:02:08.700 But he's going to be the
01:02:10.640 strongest one who's just
01:02:12.080 sitting there waiting,
01:02:13.780 potentially.
01:02:14.180 Now, DeSantis is going to get
01:02:16.160 a lot of heat from the
01:02:17.060 LGBTQ and other places.
01:02:20.160 And so he might be, he might
01:02:21.740 look a little damaged.
01:02:23.540 And I don't think he could beat
01:02:25.240 Vivek in a debate.
01:02:28.360 Because DeSantis is a pleading
01:02:30.760 voice.
01:02:31.560 I've talked about this.
01:02:33.100 And Vivek is a commanding voice.
01:02:35.160 And I don't mean the quality,
01:02:37.080 the sound of the voice.
01:02:38.740 I mean, the way they present,
01:02:41.240 DeSantis is complaining and
01:02:43.280 then telling you he'll fix it.
01:02:45.400 And Vivek also, you know,
01:02:47.520 calls out the issues.
01:02:49.000 But it's more of a commanding,
01:02:51.060 you know, I'm going to do this,
01:02:52.240 we'll do this kind of thing.
01:02:54.120 So I think Vivek would beat
01:02:57.720 DeSantis in a straight-up
01:02:59.160 debate.
01:03:02.920 But, you know, I've been
01:03:04.540 saying this a lot, but I like to
01:03:06.140 just remind you every now and
01:03:08.360 then, because it's really easy to
01:03:09.520 get down on your country.
01:03:11.220 Real easy.
01:03:13.340 But just think about the fact
01:03:14.800 that we have a Vivek,
01:03:17.620 a DeSantis,
01:03:19.800 you know, RFK Jr.,
01:03:21.100 Trump, you know, Biden, I think,
01:03:24.340 you know, he's passed his
01:03:25.220 expiration date.
01:03:26.600 So it's not about him being a
01:03:28.080 Democrat or not, because, you
01:03:29.220 know, RFK Jr. is a Democrat.
01:03:31.000 But when I see those three
01:03:33.920 characters being, you know,
01:03:35.560 serious contenders for the race,
01:03:37.520 I say, I think we'll be okay.
01:03:40.520 Like, America can still feel
01:03:43.220 that level of talent for the top
01:03:45.940 office.
01:03:46.340 And to me, that's a really high
01:03:48.480 level of talent.
01:03:49.300 You know, whoever wins, you
01:03:51.640 know, if one of those, if one
01:03:52.920 of that group wins,
01:03:55.080 I don't know, I just feel like
01:03:56.460 the country's in good shape,
01:03:57.640 even if you don't like some of
01:03:58.820 the policies.
01:04:01.460 So, DeSantis also decided
01:04:04.220 that Florida will not, or I guess
01:04:09.320 the state decided, but DeSantis is
01:04:11.000 probably behind it, that there are
01:04:13.140 five states that Florida will not
01:04:15.480 accept their driver's license of
01:04:17.320 their state.
01:04:19.300 So, if you came to Florida from
01:04:21.200 Delaware, Connecticut, Hawaii,
01:04:22.640 Rhode Island, or Vermont, you
01:04:24.560 wouldn't be able to rent a car.
01:04:27.300 Do you know why?
01:04:29.320 I believe the reason is that these
01:04:31.420 five states give driver's license to
01:04:33.780 illegal immigrants.
01:04:36.300 And DeSantis is saying, if you're
01:04:38.540 going to give licenses to
01:04:39.780 illegals, and that license allows
01:04:42.120 them to get services, my state
01:04:44.940 doesn't give services to illegals.
01:04:46.720 So, if you're going to certify that
01:04:48.600 these illegals have driver's
01:04:50.920 licenses, we're going to ban your 1.00
01:04:53.140 state.
01:04:54.460 You can't have a driver's license in
01:04:56.620 their state.
01:04:57.820 Now, all right, so somebody's saying
01:04:59.920 free money.
01:05:01.180 I get that it's popular.
01:05:03.680 However, that would be a good move as
01:05:07.440 a what?
01:05:10.460 That would be a good move as a
01:05:12.960 governor.
01:05:15.340 Yeah, that's the problem.
01:05:18.000 He just screwed five states and he's
01:05:19.940 running for governor. 0.79
01:05:20.640 Let me say it again.
01:05:23.160 In one week, DeSantis insulted the
01:05:25.780 LGBT community and five states.
01:05:29.740 Five states.
01:05:30.720 There's five states that can't have
01:05:36.240 a driver's license or can't legally
01:05:38.520 drive in Florida.
01:05:40.640 Not good.
01:05:41.980 Not good.
01:05:42.720 So, no matter what you think about
01:05:43.960 how smart that is, as a governor, as
01:05:47.300 a presidential candidate, it's just a
01:05:49.060 that's just self-immolating. 0.96
01:05:51.640 To me, it's the most ridiculously bad 0.50
01:05:53.620 idea I've ever seen.
01:05:54.980 Ever seen in my whole life.
01:05:56.480 No, that's not true.
01:05:57.460 It's not the worst idea I've ever
01:05:58.580 seen.
01:05:58.760 But this is very governor-like.
01:06:02.100 That's the wrong vibe.
01:06:03.680 I don't want a governor vibe from my
01:06:05.760 president.
01:06:09.340 All right.
01:06:10.080 And the thing I said I was going to
01:06:11.500 get back to was my favorite story of
01:06:15.060 the day.
01:06:15.920 A lot of good ones today, but my
01:06:17.420 favorite is there's a Twitter user.
01:06:20.700 I'll call him a user, but he's a
01:06:22.120 political troll called David Leavitt. 0.83
01:06:25.520 I think that's pronounced. 0.58
01:06:26.660 And he was complaining to Musk and
01:06:29.740 Twitter that somebody had called him
01:06:32.480 the C word.
01:06:34.560 It rhymes with runt, but starts with a C.
01:06:38.680 And he was saying that he couldn't
01:06:41.240 believe that Twitter would allow
01:06:42.760 somebody to stay on the platform after
01:06:45.580 using such an insult.
01:06:46.800 And it took about, oh, about a minute for
01:06:51.820 somebody to produce a November tweet from
01:06:54.460 David Leavitt in which he called somebody
01:06:56.360 a runt.
01:06:58.620 But with a C.
01:07:00.040 But with a C.
01:07:01.320 That's right.
01:07:01.820 So my advice to you is you should always
01:07:09.240 check your past tweets before you take a
01:07:11.960 stand.
01:07:13.700 Don't take a stand if you don't know what
01:07:16.040 you've tweeted in the past.
01:07:18.540 It sounds like a drunk tweet.
01:07:20.160 You're right.
01:07:22.020 But I think my theme for today is everything's
01:07:26.420 moving in the right direction.
01:07:27.500 Further proof that everything's moving in the
01:07:30.760 right direction?
01:07:31.860 On Twitter, you can use the C word.
01:07:35.480 Now, I'm not going to use it here because I
01:07:37.360 only use it in anger.
01:07:40.720 I like to save it.
01:07:42.360 You don't want to use its energy in just
01:07:44.540 talking about it.
01:07:45.560 That would be a waste of it.
01:07:46.760 You want to keep it fresh.
01:07:47.880 Okay, that was a terrible...
01:07:51.540 No, don't...
01:07:53.340 Retreat, retreat, go back.
01:07:55.500 Reverse, reverse, reverse.
01:07:57.280 No, I didn't say that.
01:07:58.320 I didn't say keep it fresh.
01:07:59.920 I'm going to say, you want to keep it
01:08:01.080 powerful.
01:08:01.980 You don't want to drain the energy out of
01:08:03.660 it.
01:08:03.840 You want to keep it powerful.
01:08:05.160 Not fresh.
01:08:06.800 Powerful.
01:08:08.020 Fresh would be good, too.
01:08:09.380 I'm not saying it shouldn't be fresh.
01:08:11.640 Keep it fresh if you can.
01:08:13.320 I'm just saying that my point was about
01:08:15.760 the energy.
01:08:16.220 You want to keep that energy in there
01:08:18.320 in case you need it.
01:08:19.960 So, once again, I'm right about
01:08:22.620 precaution.
01:08:24.620 I'm right about everything.
01:08:27.840 I'm having a good week of being right
01:08:29.580 about everything.
01:08:31.260 Wokeness is disappearing.
01:08:34.580 You may have noticed that I'm slowly
01:08:36.680 being rehabilitated from one of my
01:08:40.840 disgraced cartoonists.
01:08:42.820 You see it in small ways.
01:08:44.260 So, for the Daily Wire to feature my
01:08:47.740 tweet, it would suggest that the Daily
01:08:51.220 Wire is not afraid of me because, you
01:08:54.040 know, they were mentioning it in the
01:08:55.880 same sense as other standard, what they
01:08:59.560 would call right-leaning pundits.
01:09:01.040 How many shows in a row?
01:09:05.420 What?
01:09:09.120 So, everything's going well.
01:09:12.760 And I believe the experts, they got
01:09:17.500 nothing on us.
01:09:19.360 No, they got nothing on us.
01:09:21.640 All right, YouTube.
01:09:22.520 Thanks for joining.
01:09:26.380 Fun day today.
01:09:27.440 I'm sure it'll be fun tomorrow.
01:09:28.740 I love this summer news.
01:09:30.520 Summer news is the best.
01:09:32.380 And I will talk to you tomorrow.
01:09:33.880 Bye-bye.
01:09:44.320 Bye-bye.