Real Coffee with Scott Adams - July 06, 2023


Episode 2161 Scott Adams: News, Propaganda, Narrative, And Delicious Coffee. I Have Everything Today


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 9 minutes

Words per Minute

142.81755

Word Count

9,963

Sentence Count

804

Misogynist Sentences

12

Hate Speech Sentences

22


Summary

Scott Adams talks about a new breakthrough in battery technology, and a story about a woman who had sex with a gay man in a gay club bathroom, and the Biden and the White House sex scandal, and much, much more.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-ra-ba-ba.
00:00:05.060 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.
00:00:10.240 Probably the best thing that's ever happened to you in your life.
00:00:13.200 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and it's here.
00:00:17.500 It's here. Yeah, good news.
00:00:19.780 And all you need to make this a special day is a cupper mug or a glass,
00:00:23.180 a tecner chalice, a stein' the canteen jug or a flask of SLAV kind.
00:00:27.080 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.
00:00:31.200 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine of the day,
00:00:34.340 the thing that makes everything better.
00:00:37.040 It's called the Simultaneous Sip, and it happens now. Go.
00:00:45.200 Ah.
00:00:47.820 Very good.
00:00:49.460 What a good way to start the day with all of you.
00:00:52.480 I could not be happier.
00:00:53.680 I don't know, is it just me, or does it feel like there's something about the mental health of the country
00:01:04.220 that's rapidly improving for reasons that I'm not entirely clear about?
00:01:10.400 Does it feel like that to you?
00:01:11.820 I feel very much like we reached peak wokeness.
00:01:18.060 And everything now is, you know, it used to be just a one-way march toward greater wokeness,
00:01:24.800 and we all had to go to jail if we didn't like it or get canceled.
00:01:28.520 But now it seems as though between the Supreme Court and, you know,
00:01:33.540 just getting tired of things and maybe seeing things more clearly than we used to,
00:01:38.240 I feel like we've reached the peak and it has started to reverse.
00:01:43.640 And what it feels like is some kind of weird sanity breaking out.
00:01:48.280 It feels like sanity.
00:01:50.120 Does anybody have that feeling?
00:01:52.020 That something like common sense is starting to emerge from the miasma?
00:01:58.000 I don't know.
00:01:59.560 It might be entirely a sort of an individual experience of what news I'm reading or whatever.
00:02:05.340 Now, it could be because the news over the summer is never real news.
00:02:11.480 All the summer news is just recreational news.
00:02:15.220 So we're going to treat it as recreation with the assumption that almost none of it is true,
00:02:20.260 or at least true in total, you know, all context considered.
00:02:25.100 So let's look at the stories.
00:02:27.180 Let's have some fun with the news which is purely recreational
00:02:30.800 because everything is going in the right direction.
00:02:34.260 The economy, pretty much everything is going in the right direction.
00:02:37.820 Maybe slightly, maybe a lot,
00:02:40.400 but pretty much everything is going in the right direction.
00:02:43.780 It's kind of a weird time.
00:02:45.300 You don't expect it.
00:02:46.680 All right.
00:02:47.340 Here's what's happening.
00:02:50.000 How many times have I told you there's a new breakthrough in batteries?
00:02:54.180 Have I mentioned that ever before?
00:02:58.600 Like every two weeks there's a new breakthrough.
00:03:01.720 There's some company that's got a new battery breakthrough.
00:03:04.520 Well, here's one.
00:03:06.760 Apparently you can use rust for creating electricity and storing in a battery.
00:03:12.860 And then you can reverse the rust and turn it back into its original metal.
00:03:17.140 And then you can reverse it again.
00:03:19.600 And that gives you the ability to charge up the battery and then use the power.
00:03:24.740 Now, apparently long ago, years ago, somebody discovered that rust,
00:03:31.560 or something that's like rust, I think rust is not exactly what it is,
00:03:34.580 but it's rust adjacent.
00:03:38.240 And it was good at storing energy.
00:03:42.040 And it was good at storing it in a, let's say, gradual release way,
00:03:46.660 which is the best you want for the grid.
00:03:48.840 But they were too heavy.
00:03:50.720 Too heavy.
00:03:52.060 Was it iron?
00:03:52.980 Must have been iron, huh?
00:03:54.540 They were too heavy,
00:03:55.920 so they didn't make sense for automobiles or phones or anything like that.
00:04:01.420 But if what you're building is a permanent battery for your grid,
00:04:06.520 it doesn't really matter too much how heavy it is,
00:04:09.280 because it's just going to sit there forever.
00:04:10.760 So it turns out it might be, is it lead or is it,
00:04:14.480 I don't know what kind of metal it was,
00:04:15.920 but they rust it and reverse the rust.
00:04:20.320 Anyway, it's supposedly the ideal technology for the grid.
00:04:26.940 So that's good news.
00:04:29.020 All right.
00:04:31.140 You knew there was going to be a story about Don Jr., right?
00:04:34.960 Did everybody see that coming?
00:04:37.060 Let's see.
00:04:37.680 The news is filled with allegations about Hunter Biden
00:04:41.000 and the cocaine at the White House.
00:04:43.160 What do we think will happen this week?
00:04:46.020 Oh, yeah.
00:04:46.700 Oh, yeah.
00:04:47.080 There'll be a story about Don Jr.
00:04:49.660 It's horrible, folks.
00:04:52.980 I hate to break it to you.
00:04:54.840 This terrible, terrible story about Don Jr.
00:04:58.720 Oh, my God.
00:04:59.520 He really...
00:05:00.440 According to Aubrey O'Day,
00:05:03.020 a sexy blonde woman who must be famous for something that I'm not aware of,
00:05:09.480 she said that she once had sex with Don Jr.
00:05:13.300 in a gay club bathroom.
00:05:18.520 So, oh, that's...
00:05:21.540 I don't know.
00:05:23.520 You got one doing cocaine in the White House,
00:05:26.500 another one's boinking a hot woman in a gay nightclub.
00:05:30.900 So, of course, I had to check the comments on Twitter
00:05:34.140 to see what people would say about that.
00:05:37.440 Oh.
00:05:40.720 All right.
00:05:41.320 Somebody beat me to the joke.
00:05:43.780 Somebody asked if it meant that Don Jr. was gay.
00:05:48.380 That's what somebody meant.
00:05:50.140 You know, wait a minute.
00:05:51.560 He had sex with a hot woman in the bathroom of a gay nightclub?
00:05:54.700 I wonder if he's gay.
00:05:58.800 That was the best comment I saw.
00:06:03.220 Now, I'm thinking to myself,
00:06:05.340 this is just me,
00:06:07.040 because, you know, I have a boy brain,
00:06:09.400 so I can only really think like a guy.
00:06:11.880 I can't really turn that off.
00:06:13.800 And I read this story, and I'm thinking to myself,
00:06:16.780 seriously?
00:06:19.500 Don Jr. went to a gay nightclub and got laid?
00:06:22.400 Oh, come on.
00:06:30.500 First son.
00:06:31.740 First son.
00:06:33.000 Give it up for the first son.
00:06:34.900 Whoa.
00:06:35.980 All right.
00:06:37.560 Don Jr.
00:06:39.120 You go.
00:06:40.620 You go, Don Jr.
00:06:43.240 I suppose that's the terrible story about Don Jr.
00:06:47.400 that we're supposed to feel bad about or something,
00:06:49.720 distract us a little bit.
00:06:52.400 But I think Don Jr.
00:06:55.620 has won the first son competition
00:06:57.980 fairly cleanly.
00:07:00.660 Fairly cleanly, I think.
00:07:04.740 All right.
00:07:06.560 You might be aware that the Supreme Court ruled
00:07:09.300 that the government can't coerce social media platforms
00:07:13.900 to limit free speech,
00:07:15.780 because that would just be an extension
00:07:17.640 of a government limiting free speech,
00:07:20.120 even though it's the free market.
00:07:22.680 So now we're in good shape, right?
00:07:25.900 Thank goodness.
00:07:26.880 Thank goodness for the Supreme Court.
00:07:28.420 Yeah, we had that problem of maybe the,
00:07:32.880 you know, maybe the platforms were biased
00:07:36.120 by the government,
00:07:38.000 and so the Supreme Court's fixed that forever.
00:07:40.500 So we'll never have a problem again with bias.
00:07:43.480 Problem solved.
00:07:44.620 Well, my next story is that,
00:07:50.720 do you know what happens when Twitter tries to be unbiased
00:07:56.280 and stops censoring things?
00:08:01.220 Well, it turns out that Facebook starts up a competitor.
00:08:04.540 A competitor.
00:08:06.600 A competitor.
00:08:08.320 It's called Threads,
00:08:09.840 and it launched, I guess, yesterday, last night.
00:08:13.020 And it's a Twitter knockoff,
00:08:16.280 but it's by Facebook slash meta slash Instagram.
00:08:20.280 And people are saying, you know,
00:08:21.880 it has a good chance because the Instagram community
00:08:25.060 will just be moved over if you want to,
00:08:27.400 optionally, I guess.
00:08:28.720 So you can move your followers over to it.
00:08:31.780 A number of people tried it.
00:08:33.240 It had a huge uptick.
00:08:35.160 I think 10 million people signed up pretty quickly, etc.
00:08:40.440 Now, here's my question for you.
00:08:49.060 Do you think that Threads would have happened
00:08:51.480 if Zuckerberg, if Musk had not bought Twitter?
00:08:58.540 Does Threads look like a good business play,
00:09:02.260 or does it look like somebody
00:09:04.180 who is screwing his shareholders, probably,
00:09:07.420 the meta shareholders?
00:09:08.900 Do you think the meta shareholders
00:09:10.500 would like to clone the only social network?
00:09:14.880 Well, it's not the only one.
00:09:16.200 Snapchat doesn't make money.
00:09:17.940 But Twitter doesn't make money.
00:09:20.820 Does Facebook know that Twitter doesn't make money?
00:09:23.100 So their idea is to make half a Twitter,
00:09:27.740 like one that doesn't have, you know,
00:09:29.740 the right mix of people to fight.
00:09:32.680 So they've created basically a Democrat Twitter,
00:09:36.260 which guarantees that neither the Democrat Twitter
00:09:39.260 nor the Republican Twitter,
00:09:40.880 if, you know, if such a thing happens
00:09:43.060 and it just bifurcates,
00:09:45.200 neither of them will have any energy.
00:09:47.380 Neither could they be profitable.
00:09:48.880 To me, it looks like Zuckerberg is using the shareholders' money
00:09:54.040 for political purposes.
00:09:56.800 Am I wrong?
00:09:58.620 Does this look like a business decision?
00:10:04.080 Does it look like Zuckerberg just thought,
00:10:06.460 huh, what would be a good product in the free market?
00:10:10.200 Well, Twitter isn't making any money.
00:10:12.880 Yeah.
00:10:13.360 Why don't we make something that's just like that?
00:10:18.840 I cannot, there's no part of me
00:10:21.380 that thinks that's a business decision.
00:10:24.500 Do you think it is?
00:10:26.360 Do you think that Zuckerberg believes
00:10:27.980 that that's how he could make money?
00:10:31.280 I don't think so.
00:10:32.780 I think this is purely Zuckerberg being a good Democrat,
00:10:36.800 you know, probably doing things
00:10:38.440 that he thinks are good for the country.
00:10:40.240 I'm not saying he has bad intentions.
00:10:41.940 I'm saying that he probably thinks it's good for the country
00:10:44.660 and shareholders be damned.
00:10:47.980 This is why I don't own stock in Meta.
00:10:52.600 Because this is the sort of behavior
00:10:54.160 that I'm not looking for in a company I'm investing in.
00:10:57.400 Like, I definitely wouldn't want them to be doing this.
00:11:00.300 That doesn't look like the right business move.
00:11:02.980 But, there it is.
00:11:05.180 The first, I guess the first thread, if you call it that,
00:11:08.860 was from Zuckerberg himself.
00:11:10.620 And he said, and I quote,
00:11:13.040 Let's do this.
00:11:14.280 Welcome to Threads.
00:11:16.400 Let's do this.
00:11:18.680 Now, the story does not mention
00:11:21.020 whether or not he was playing
00:11:22.540 white boy air guitar when he said it.
00:11:25.260 But I believe that that goes better with air guitar.
00:11:28.520 Let me see.
00:11:29.120 Let me see.
00:11:29.620 I'll give you the two.
00:11:30.940 Let's do it.
00:11:31.920 Welcome to Threads.
00:11:33.740 Kind of just lays there, doesn't it?
00:11:35.220 But let's just take this up to full boring white guy level.
00:11:42.760 Air guitar.
00:11:45.940 Let's do this.
00:11:49.600 Right?
00:11:50.500 So much better.
00:11:53.560 Zuckerberg needs some help in the air guitar.
00:11:56.880 That just should have been part of it.
00:11:58.460 All right.
00:12:01.080 So that's happening.
00:12:03.100 I saw a tweet by Donald Luskin,
00:12:06.200 who's a good follow on Twitter.
00:12:07.740 You should follow him.
00:12:09.460 He points out that
00:12:10.820 if it's not bad enough to have a guy named Blinken
00:12:14.740 negotiating for us in China,
00:12:17.840 that's right.
00:12:18.420 Our negotiator is Blinken.
00:12:21.660 It's just, I don't know.
00:12:22.840 The simulation is just messing with us now.
00:12:24.760 But now it turns out that Hunter Biden's new lawyer,
00:12:29.020 who happens to be a GOP operative,
00:12:32.100 is named Riggleman.
00:12:34.400 Riggleman.
00:12:35.440 A lawyer named Riggleman.
00:12:37.860 Now, I think Riggleman should be working on election security,
00:12:41.620 don't you?
00:12:43.080 Yeah.
00:12:43.620 I want a lawyer named Riggleman
00:12:46.000 working on election integrity.
00:12:47.700 Just because.
00:12:49.720 Don't you?
00:12:50.860 Come on.
00:12:51.620 We all want that.
00:12:52.360 All right.
00:12:54.320 Rasmussen did a little poll
00:12:55.820 about what people think about
00:12:57.380 that cocaine in the White House.
00:13:02.100 And 58% of likely U.S. voters
00:13:04.420 think it is likely.
00:13:06.400 The president was involved
00:13:07.800 in Hunter's foreign business deals.
00:13:10.300 Oh, so it's more about the foreign business deals.
00:13:14.680 So a majority,
00:13:16.820 pretty solid majority,
00:13:18.500 think that the president was involved
00:13:20.120 in Hunter's business deals.
00:13:21.220 Now,
00:13:22.720 are you surprised that anybody still pretends
00:13:26.540 that they think he wasn't?
00:13:29.760 Do you think they're uninformed
00:13:31.320 or is this recreational belief?
00:13:34.660 Where, for fun,
00:13:36.500 you pretend that you're on the other side,
00:13:38.460 yeah, no,
00:13:39.360 he had nothing to do with it.
00:13:41.500 It doesn't feel like a real opinion.
00:13:44.000 Does it?
00:13:44.500 Like, I could understand
00:13:46.180 if people are just,
00:13:47.100 you know,
00:13:48.960 uninformed.
00:13:50.320 But the uninformed
00:13:51.260 usually are smart enough
00:13:52.480 to say they don't know
00:13:53.540 when they get polled.
00:13:57.340 But really,
00:13:58.560 could there really be
00:13:59.600 that many Democrats
00:14:00.600 who actually believe
00:14:02.640 that the dad was unaware?
00:14:06.560 It doesn't even seem possible.
00:14:08.640 I guess anything's possible.
00:14:09.860 But it feels recreational.
00:14:13.220 It doesn't feel like a real opinion.
00:14:16.580 Maybe none of our opinions are real.
00:14:18.500 Maybe mine are not real either.
00:14:20.520 But this one seems extra not real.
00:14:23.360 All right.
00:14:24.020 Well,
00:14:24.540 by now,
00:14:25.200 you've probably all seen
00:14:26.080 the press reports
00:14:27.400 in which Hunter Biden's
00:14:30.360 new attorney,
00:14:31.020 Riggleman,
00:14:32.220 denied that the cocaine found
00:14:34.440 in the White House
00:14:35.600 was Hunter's.
00:14:37.780 Did you all see that?
00:14:38.700 Did you see the press release
00:14:40.700 where Hunter denied
00:14:41.500 it was his?
00:14:42.680 Oh, it didn't happen.
00:14:44.920 Oh, no,
00:14:45.780 you didn't see it
00:14:46.340 because it didn't happen.
00:14:48.140 Now,
00:14:48.580 if you were Hunter Biden
00:14:50.760 and you'd been accused
00:14:52.960 of much bad behavior,
00:14:55.780 which apparently was true,
00:14:57.660 don't you think that
00:14:59.340 right near the top
00:15:00.980 of the things you would do
00:15:01.980 in this situation,
00:15:03.020 if that cocaine
00:15:04.240 were not yours,
00:15:06.180 wouldn't the first thing
00:15:07.940 you do
00:15:08.440 really near the top
00:15:10.140 of the first things
00:15:10.960 you do in the morning
00:15:11.700 when you woke up
00:15:12.580 is call your lawyer
00:15:13.940 and say,
00:15:15.060 can you just put out
00:15:15.760 a boring press release
00:15:17.100 that just says,
00:15:19.060 you know,
00:15:19.340 I had nothing to do with it?
00:15:20.960 Just put it out there.
00:15:23.600 Where's that?
00:15:25.420 Now,
00:15:25.880 I do understand
00:15:26.660 that if it had been
00:15:27.940 his cocaine,
00:15:29.060 it might be a bad play
00:15:30.900 to deny it.
00:15:32.260 You know,
00:15:32.520 just let it play out
00:15:33.780 for a while.
00:15:34.160 But what if it's,
00:15:35.740 what if he knows
00:15:36.440 for sure it's not his?
00:15:39.180 How do you play it
00:15:40.180 if you know it's not yours?
00:15:41.560 If you know it,
00:15:42.900 do you stay silent?
00:15:44.540 Is that how you play it
00:15:45.340 if you know it's yours?
00:15:46.800 Or if you know
00:15:47.540 it's not yours
00:15:48.320 and the news is saying
00:15:49.400 it might be
00:15:49.900 or social media
00:15:50.980 is saying it might be.
00:15:52.400 So you just stay silent
00:15:53.740 in that situation,
00:15:54.680 right?
00:15:56.260 Hunter Biden
00:15:56.960 went to law school too.
00:15:59.860 Isn't he actually a lawyer?
00:16:01.740 And he's got a lawyer
00:16:03.760 and he works in government
00:16:05.700 so he's surrounded
00:16:06.680 by experts
00:16:07.660 and advisors
00:16:08.940 and staffers
00:16:09.980 who can tell you
00:16:10.760 exactly the right thing
00:16:11.920 to do.
00:16:12.680 You know what the right
00:16:13.600 thing to do would be?
00:16:15.680 If it's not his,
00:16:18.440 the right thing to do
00:16:20.180 is to say
00:16:21.720 it's not yours.
00:16:23.660 It's not really hard,
00:16:25.180 is it?
00:16:26.540 Now,
00:16:26.960 of course,
00:16:27.400 people might say
00:16:28.160 he's lying
00:16:28.820 or whatever,
00:16:29.500 but it's the easiest
00:16:32.240 thing to say
00:16:33.080 that wasn't mine.
00:16:34.820 How hard is that?
00:16:36.940 But it's not there.
00:16:38.400 It's missing.
00:16:39.680 The dog is simply
00:16:40.600 not barking.
00:16:41.740 Not only is the dog
00:16:42.820 not barking,
00:16:43.860 but you had to wait
00:16:44.840 for me
00:16:45.620 to tell you that.
00:16:48.580 Did CNN say
00:16:49.540 where's the denial?
00:16:51.260 Did CNN say
00:16:52.180 we've contacted him
00:16:53.360 and he won't comment?
00:16:55.460 Do you remember
00:16:55.920 that story
00:16:56.440 where they tried
00:16:57.020 to get a comment
00:16:57.620 and he wouldn't comment?
00:16:58.320 Or they couldn't
00:16:59.440 find him?
00:17:00.600 Or they couldn't
00:17:01.340 find anybody
00:17:01.840 who could find him?
00:17:03.040 They couldn't
00:17:03.380 find his lawyer?
00:17:04.760 Couldn't get
00:17:05.160 any comment
00:17:05.660 whatsoever?
00:17:07.040 Do you remember
00:17:07.660 when they reported
00:17:08.440 that Hunter
00:17:09.200 said no comment?
00:17:10.580 No, you don't
00:17:11.400 because they
00:17:12.120 never reported that.
00:17:13.500 They didn't report
00:17:14.220 they tried to reach him.
00:17:15.260 They didn't report
00:17:15.840 what he said.
00:17:16.480 They didn't report
00:17:17.060 where he is.
00:17:17.660 They didn't report
00:17:18.220 they talked to his lawyer.
00:17:20.160 Nothing.
00:17:23.560 And we all just
00:17:24.440 sat here
00:17:24.880 with our thumbs up
00:17:25.700 our asses
00:17:26.280 acting like that
00:17:27.000 was normal.
00:17:27.520 Oh, that's normal.
00:17:31.200 All right.
00:17:32.660 What else?
00:17:37.340 Now, what about
00:17:38.260 the fingerprints?
00:17:41.300 At least law enforcement
00:17:42.820 has told us
00:17:43.800 that the baggie
00:17:46.060 didn't have
00:17:47.020 any fingerprints
00:17:47.540 on it.
00:17:48.100 So at least we know
00:17:48.760 that, right?
00:17:49.800 What?
00:17:50.580 What?
00:17:51.380 Oh, we haven't heard.
00:17:53.400 That's right.
00:17:53.920 We haven't heard
00:17:54.720 not only
00:17:55.900 if the fingerprints
00:17:57.220 identify anybody,
00:17:58.720 but we haven't even
00:17:59.920 heard if they tried
00:18:00.800 to get any.
00:18:02.760 Don't you think
00:18:03.540 that law enforcement
00:18:04.360 would say
00:18:04.880 we have some prints?
00:18:07.300 Or,
00:18:08.320 alternately,
00:18:09.440 they would say
00:18:09.920 we checked for prints
00:18:10.820 and didn't find any.
00:18:12.780 Wouldn't you expect
00:18:13.540 that to be in the news?
00:18:15.440 The single most
00:18:16.420 obvious thing.
00:18:18.380 The single most
00:18:19.340 obvious part.
00:18:20.200 Well, DNA.
00:18:21.940 Could you get DNA
00:18:22.960 off of just somebody
00:18:24.500 touching a baggie?
00:18:27.480 All right.
00:18:28.660 I don't know
00:18:29.320 if you can.
00:18:30.220 I did hear
00:18:30.940 from a fingerprint expert.
00:18:33.140 This is what I love
00:18:34.020 about social media.
00:18:35.040 Of all things,
00:18:37.700 there's somebody
00:18:38.120 who's a fingerprint expert
00:18:39.420 who's one of my followers.
00:18:41.840 And the fingerprint expert
00:18:43.140 said that getting
00:18:44.180 a print off
00:18:45.320 a plastic bag,
00:18:46.600 a baggie,
00:18:47.400 is actually
00:18:48.240 close to impossible.
00:18:49.980 Did you know that?
00:18:51.820 Did you know
00:18:52.500 it's really hard
00:18:53.060 to get a print
00:18:53.820 off a plastic bag?
00:18:55.360 Do you know
00:18:55.780 how I knew it?
00:18:57.340 Not from the news.
00:18:59.440 Did you see it
00:19:00.060 on CNN?
00:19:00.960 Nope.
00:19:01.900 Did CNN ever say,
00:19:03.040 you know,
00:19:03.180 it'd be hard
00:19:03.500 to get a print
00:19:04.000 off a plastic bag?
00:19:05.500 If it is,
00:19:06.160 I mean,
00:19:06.440 I heard it from
00:19:07.040 one person
00:19:07.620 who sounded
00:19:08.180 like an expert.
00:19:09.660 How about Fox News?
00:19:11.320 Even Fox News
00:19:12.140 didn't report it.
00:19:13.620 That it's hard
00:19:15.140 to get a print
00:19:15.680 off a baggie
00:19:16.360 or that it's easy.
00:19:18.000 Tell us it's easy,
00:19:19.100 it's hard,
00:19:19.940 we could definitely
00:19:20.620 get some DNA,
00:19:21.640 we can't get some DNA,
00:19:23.240 might get a fingerprint,
00:19:24.500 might not,
00:19:25.200 might be partial,
00:19:27.080 might belong
00:19:27.720 to other people,
00:19:28.520 you don't know,
00:19:29.220 right?
00:19:30.760 Everything about
00:19:31.580 this story
00:19:32.060 is just missing.
00:19:32.820 Everything that matters
00:19:35.220 about this story
00:19:35.940 is just missing.
00:19:36.980 The only thing
00:19:37.640 that I'm surprised
00:19:38.320 they told us
00:19:39.000 is that it tested out
00:19:40.700 as a drug.
00:19:43.180 That's the only thing
00:19:44.000 I'm surprised about.
00:19:45.860 All right.
00:19:46.200 I don't know
00:19:53.700 why this story
00:19:54.240 is out of order.
00:19:55.120 I've got an
00:19:55.520 out of order story
00:19:56.340 I'll have to get back to.
00:19:58.560 But I don't know
00:19:59.820 if you saw
00:20:00.140 that the Daily Wire
00:20:01.500 featured one of my tweets
00:20:03.320 on this issue.
00:20:06.220 So Politico
00:20:07.580 had a headline yesterday
00:20:08.800 that said,
00:20:09.920 White House cocaine
00:20:10.800 culprit unlikely
00:20:12.160 to be found.
00:20:14.560 Law enforcement says.
00:20:16.860 Now,
00:20:18.100 how in the world
00:20:19.000 is that unlikely?
00:20:21.440 How in the world
00:20:22.360 is that unlikely?
00:20:23.840 Unless,
00:20:25.620 unless,
00:20:27.280 Hunter's not saying
00:20:29.640 it isn't his,
00:20:31.040 nobody's talking
00:20:31.880 about DNA
00:20:32.520 or fingerprints,
00:20:33.820 and they're
00:20:34.280 completely silent
00:20:35.280 about surveillance
00:20:37.740 and video cams
00:20:38.960 in that area,
00:20:39.960 or even what area
00:20:40.920 it was.
00:20:41.300 But still,
00:20:43.860 Politico
00:20:44.400 is feeling
00:20:45.400 some confidence
00:20:46.160 in this headline.
00:20:47.840 White House cocaine
00:20:48.800 culprit unlikely
00:20:49.920 to be found.
00:20:51.300 Now,
00:20:51.800 what type of persuasion
00:20:53.300 is that?
00:20:54.140 Because this is
00:20:54.880 obviously propaganda
00:20:55.920 narrative.
00:20:57.760 What type of,
00:20:58.880 so I call it
00:21:00.100 softening up the room.
00:21:02.480 Softening up the room.
00:21:04.160 Basically,
00:21:05.000 people can get
00:21:05.740 used to anything
00:21:06.940 if they just
00:21:08.300 get exposed
00:21:08.880 to it a lot.
00:21:10.180 So what you
00:21:10.680 don't want
00:21:11.380 is,
00:21:12.460 you know,
00:21:13.040 to go down
00:21:13.980 the line
00:21:14.500 and then someday
00:21:16.000 find out
00:21:17.320 that you can't
00:21:18.260 figure out
00:21:18.660 who it is.
00:21:20.100 You want people
00:21:21.020 to say right ahead,
00:21:22.000 I don't know,
00:21:22.860 this is one of those
00:21:23.860 situations where
00:21:24.900 I think it would
00:21:25.960 be unlikely
00:21:26.680 we'd figure out
00:21:27.500 who the real
00:21:27.980 culprit was.
00:21:29.200 Very unlikely.
00:21:31.040 Yeah.
00:21:31.400 So then a year
00:21:32.760 from now
00:21:33.200 when in fact
00:21:33.800 we don't know
00:21:34.420 who it was
00:21:35.100 or at least
00:21:35.820 it's not reported,
00:21:37.240 we can say,
00:21:38.280 yeah,
00:21:38.600 that's sort of
00:21:39.200 what everybody
00:21:39.660 expected.
00:21:40.760 You know,
00:21:40.940 the experts
00:21:41.500 told us
00:21:42.440 we're not going
00:21:42.960 to find out
00:21:43.420 who it is.
00:21:44.840 Pure propaganda.
00:21:47.380 So a number
00:21:48.700 of people
00:21:49.080 called them out
00:21:50.320 for it.
00:21:50.760 I was one of them.
00:21:51.860 Daily Wire
00:21:52.540 printed my tweet
00:21:56.160 in which I said
00:21:57.000 we can now
00:21:58.060 accurately predict
00:21:59.100 all future headlines
00:22:00.160 and here's one
00:22:01.040 we all knew
00:22:01.560 was coming
00:22:02.080 and it was
00:22:02.580 the headline
00:22:03.080 about White House
00:22:04.220 cocaine culprit
00:22:05.000 unlikely to be found.
00:22:07.540 Didn't every one
00:22:08.660 of you know
00:22:09.200 that that headline
00:22:09.860 was coming?
00:22:11.480 Is there anybody
00:22:12.200 here who didn't
00:22:12.940 know for sure
00:22:13.980 that there would
00:22:15.080 be a headline
00:22:15.540 saying that?
00:22:16.840 I don't know.
00:22:18.040 We just can't
00:22:18.840 find the Epstein
00:22:20.620 client.
00:22:21.820 Oh,
00:22:22.180 did I say Epstein?
00:22:22.900 I'm sorry,
00:22:23.240 I meant a whole
00:22:24.380 different story.
00:22:25.740 Yeah,
00:22:26.000 no,
00:22:26.260 we will never
00:22:27.100 be able to find
00:22:27.940 the,
00:22:28.200 you just knew
00:22:30.380 it was going
00:22:30.780 to go this
00:22:31.280 way.
00:22:32.820 Now,
00:22:34.140 don't you think
00:22:35.360 that the entire
00:22:36.260 White House
00:22:37.340 security operation
00:22:38.940 should be fired?
00:22:41.080 If it's true
00:22:42.120 that there was
00:22:43.380 no video surveillance
00:22:44.580 in a part of the,
00:22:45.340 in part of the
00:22:46.300 White House,
00:22:48.180 they couldn't,
00:22:48.880 they couldn't even
00:22:49.440 tell from the,
00:22:50.820 are you telling me
00:22:51.460 they couldn't even
00:22:51.980 tell from the
00:22:52.580 hallway cameras
00:22:53.660 who entered the room?
00:22:55.440 couldn't even tell
00:22:56.580 who entered the
00:22:57.340 room,
00:22:57.540 right?
00:22:58.100 Because there's
00:22:58.700 no surveillance
00:22:59.320 in there?
00:23:01.560 Come on,
00:23:02.980 come on.
00:23:04.300 The entire,
00:23:05.240 they would all
00:23:05.840 be fired by now
00:23:06.940 if they didn't
00:23:07.900 already know
00:23:08.400 who this was.
00:23:10.160 All right.
00:23:12.800 I would like
00:23:13.620 to add my own
00:23:15.040 conspiracy theory
00:23:16.100 to the mix.
00:23:17.220 I don't believe
00:23:18.060 I've heard this
00:23:18.760 one yet.
00:23:19.980 So,
00:23:20.660 will you do me
00:23:21.180 some fact checking
00:23:21.980 and tell me
00:23:23.060 if you've seen
00:23:23.660 this on social
00:23:24.400 media or any
00:23:25.540 pundit?
00:23:27.540 The most likely
00:23:29.280 person or
00:23:30.760 entities that
00:23:32.240 would leave that
00:23:33.020 cocaine in the
00:23:33.700 White House
00:23:34.120 would be,
00:23:35.480 go,
00:23:36.720 the most likely
00:23:37.640 person to leave
00:23:38.420 that bag of
00:23:39.000 cocaine would
00:23:39.800 be,
00:23:40.120 most likely,
00:23:41.740 most likely
00:23:43.040 staffers,
00:23:45.920 Zelensky,
00:23:47.480 Don Jr.,
00:23:48.940 reporters,
00:23:50.160 yeah.
00:23:53.220 So,
00:23:53.940 if it had
00:23:54.340 been,
00:23:54.620 if it had
00:23:55.400 been left
00:23:56.000 accidentally,
00:23:58.080 if it had
00:24:00.300 been left
00:24:01.080 accidentally,
00:24:01.880 you'd probably
00:24:02.240 think staffers,
00:24:04.000 yeah.
00:24:04.280 I would think
00:24:05.020 that Hunter
00:24:05.520 is maybe
00:24:07.100 not in the,
00:24:09.320 not at the
00:24:10.160 very top of
00:24:10.880 my suspect
00:24:11.440 list.
00:24:12.400 He'd be
00:24:12.780 around number
00:24:13.360 three,
00:24:14.720 you know,
00:24:14.940 just my
00:24:15.320 personal
00:24:15.780 judgment of
00:24:16.480 things.
00:24:17.780 But there
00:24:18.440 could be
00:24:18.680 lots of
00:24:18.980 people,
00:24:19.340 right?
00:24:20.160 All right,
00:24:21.180 here's my,
00:24:24.800 this might
00:24:25.460 actually change
00:24:26.060 the headlines,
00:24:26.840 so I'm a
00:24:27.140 little hesitant
00:24:27.640 to say it.
00:24:28.780 You ready
00:24:29.160 for this?
00:24:31.340 It looks
00:24:32.140 like an
00:24:32.480 intelligence
00:24:32.860 operation to
00:24:33.680 me.
00:24:36.400 There's
00:24:36.980 nothing that
00:24:38.360 screams
00:24:38.920 law enforcement
00:24:41.260 or intelligence
00:24:42.120 operation like
00:24:43.220 planting drugs.
00:24:45.360 Planting drugs
00:24:46.440 is sort of
00:24:47.700 like, you
00:24:49.240 know,
00:24:49.620 operation,
00:24:51.080 it's like,
00:24:52.220 it's like the
00:24:52.740 first lesson,
00:24:53.440 isn't it?
00:24:54.680 What is more
00:24:55.620 basic than
00:24:56.220 planting drugs
00:24:57.040 somewhere?
00:24:58.200 I can't think
00:24:58.780 of anything.
00:24:59.720 You know,
00:24:59.920 maybe taking
00:25:00.500 some naughty
00:25:01.560 pictures of
00:25:02.120 somebody having
00:25:02.560 sex that they
00:25:03.400 don't know
00:25:03.720 about.
00:25:04.740 It's like the
00:25:05.300 most basic
00:25:05.760 thing.
00:25:07.060 So,
00:25:07.980 ask yourself
00:25:08.840 this.
00:25:10.000 How badly
00:25:10.760 does the
00:25:11.840 deep state
00:25:14.080 want Biden
00:25:15.200 to willingly
00:25:16.340 get out of
00:25:16.980 the race?
00:25:18.260 How much
00:25:18.800 do the real
00:25:19.940 people of
00:25:20.480 power,
00:25:20.960 whoever they
00:25:21.420 might be,
00:25:21.920 let's call
00:25:22.320 them the
00:25:22.660 deep state,
00:25:23.640 how much
00:25:24.140 do even
00:25:24.680 the Democrats
00:25:25.580 want Biden
00:25:26.980 to leave so
00:25:27.620 they have a
00:25:27.940 better chance
00:25:28.900 of winning?
00:25:30.760 A lot.
00:25:32.280 Do you
00:25:32.700 think it
00:25:33.060 could be a
00:25:33.600 GOP operative,
00:25:35.240 just somebody
00:25:35.800 who had access
00:25:36.380 to the White
00:25:36.880 House,
00:25:37.160 and just
00:25:38.240 took it out
00:25:38.660 of their
00:25:38.820 pocket,
00:25:39.460 shoved it
00:25:39.800 on the
00:25:40.040 shelf,
00:25:41.240 and said,
00:25:42.920 when they
00:25:43.380 find this,
00:25:44.220 that's the
00:25:44.560 end to the
00:25:44.920 Bidens.
00:25:47.140 Because,
00:25:47.740 ask yourself
00:25:48.500 this,
00:25:49.980 Hunter Biden,
00:25:51.440 you know,
00:25:51.800 the story is
00:25:52.380 that Hunter
00:25:52.740 Biden is back
00:25:53.480 in the White
00:25:53.900 House,
00:25:54.800 you know,
00:25:55.000 after being
00:25:55.500 sort of out
00:25:56.540 of the news,
00:25:57.200 his plea
00:25:57.700 deal is the
00:25:58.740 news,
00:25:59.500 and then he's
00:25:59.900 back in the
00:26:00.360 White House.
00:26:01.180 What are the
00:26:01.940 odds?
00:26:02.920 What are the
00:26:03.360 odds that Hunter
00:26:04.280 is the one
00:26:05.360 who put it
00:26:05.740 there?
00:26:07.160 Really?
00:26:08.180 Now,
00:26:08.940 isn't that a
00:26:09.680 little bit too
00:26:10.100 on the nose?
00:26:11.500 Don't we know
00:26:12.080 that Hunter is
00:26:12.620 somebody that
00:26:13.100 forgets things,
00:26:14.260 like laptops all
00:26:15.220 over the place?
00:26:16.480 A little on the
00:26:17.280 nose, huh?
00:26:18.700 Happens to be
00:26:19.340 cocaine,
00:26:20.080 just happens to
00:26:20.780 be Hunter's
00:26:21.520 preferred drug,
00:26:22.720 and he's a guy
00:26:23.380 who leaves things
00:26:24.080 and places,
00:26:24.920 and he's just
00:26:25.500 been in the
00:26:26.000 news,
00:26:26.580 and then suddenly
00:26:28.100 he brings
00:26:29.460 cocaine to the
00:26:30.140 White House?
00:26:31.240 Isn't that a
00:26:31.960 little bit
00:26:32.380 exactly on the
00:26:33.520 nose?
00:26:34.900 All right.
00:26:35.300 I'm going to
00:26:36.540 go for
00:26:37.180 fake story.
00:26:40.480 I say it's
00:26:41.580 not Hunters,
00:26:42.860 and it's not
00:26:43.720 a staffer,
00:26:44.820 and it was
00:26:45.240 not left
00:26:45.740 there accidentally.
00:26:48.420 Not Hunters,
00:26:49.960 not anybody
00:26:50.780 else leaving
00:26:51.900 it accidentally.
00:26:53.240 It is not
00:26:53.940 accidental.
00:26:56.760 Now,
00:26:57.320 has anybody
00:26:57.580 else said
00:26:57.900 that?
00:26:59.120 Have you
00:26:59.680 heard that
00:26:59.980 speculation
00:27:00.580 anywhere else?
00:27:01.360 Because I
00:27:01.600 haven't seen
00:27:01.960 it anywhere else.
00:27:03.440 Anybody else?
00:27:04.020 All right.
00:27:07.400 So you
00:27:07.640 haven't seen
00:27:08.040 that before.
00:27:09.740 Now,
00:27:10.380 you tell me
00:27:11.180 that that's
00:27:11.600 not the
00:27:11.960 most likely
00:27:12.520 scenario.
00:27:14.180 Compare
00:27:14.460 these two
00:27:15.020 scenarios.
00:27:16.740 If you
00:27:17.640 wanted Hunter
00:27:18.360 Biden and
00:27:18.980 the Bidens
00:27:19.380 to go down,
00:27:20.880 this would
00:27:21.420 be the
00:27:21.740 entire amount
00:27:22.460 of effort
00:27:22.900 it would
00:27:23.160 take to
00:27:23.500 take them
00:27:23.900 down.
00:27:25.200 Let's say
00:27:25.820 you're just
00:27:26.400 a bad
00:27:26.740 person.
00:27:27.900 You had
00:27:28.160 access to
00:27:28.660 the White
00:27:28.800 House.
00:27:29.260 This is
00:27:29.760 your entire
00:27:30.360 that's
00:27:33.760 it.
00:27:34.460 And the
00:27:34.780 entire
00:27:35.060 administration
00:27:35.660 is gone.
00:27:36.620 You reach
00:27:37.020 into your
00:27:37.260 pocket.
00:27:38.520 You stand
00:27:38.920 in front
00:27:39.300 of the
00:27:39.540 security
00:27:39.800 camera.
00:27:39.900 Maybe you
00:27:40.200 know where
00:27:40.460 the security
00:27:41.260 camera is.
00:27:42.100 Maybe you
00:27:42.540 even know
00:27:42.800 where it
00:27:43.000 is.
00:27:46.420 So you
00:27:46.940 just take
00:27:47.420 it out of
00:27:47.680 your pocket.
00:27:48.240 You slip
00:27:48.600 it in a
00:27:48.940 cubbyhole
00:27:49.400 or wherever
00:27:49.780 they found
00:27:50.220 it.
00:27:51.740 Literally
00:27:52.140 reach in
00:27:52.780 your pocket
00:27:53.220 and you
00:27:53.620 end the
00:27:53.960 Biden
00:27:54.180 administration.
00:27:55.740 That's
00:27:55.980 it.
00:27:57.740 Literally
00:27:58.140 reach in
00:27:59.040 your pocket
00:27:59.740 put something
00:28:01.700 on a shelf
00:28:02.340 or wherever
00:28:02.780 the hell
00:28:03.020 it was.
00:28:04.100 That's the
00:28:04.500 end of the
00:28:04.860 Biden
00:28:05.080 administration.
00:28:07.500 You don't
00:28:08.220 think that
00:28:08.760 there's anybody
00:28:09.380 who thought
00:28:09.920 of that?
00:28:12.300 It would
00:28:12.940 be the
00:28:13.260 perfect
00:28:13.540 op.
00:28:15.180 It would
00:28:15.740 be the
00:28:16.020 perfect
00:28:16.340 op.
00:28:17.300 Now the
00:28:17.640 one person
00:28:19.280 or entity
00:28:19.880 that I'm
00:28:20.280 going to
00:28:20.480 rule out
00:28:21.080 I'm going
00:28:22.340 to rule
00:28:22.780 out Ukraine.
00:28:26.140 Ukraine I
00:28:26.860 think likes
00:28:27.240 Biden.
00:28:27.580 I would
00:28:28.780 rule out
00:28:29.380 the
00:28:29.680 military
00:28:30.260 industrial
00:28:30.740 complex
00:28:31.460 because they
00:28:33.120 like Biden.
00:28:34.240 They like
00:28:34.680 him spending
00:28:35.120 money on
00:28:35.560 Ukraine.
00:28:37.000 So if
00:28:38.060 the
00:28:38.260 military
00:28:38.700 industrial
00:28:39.200 complex
00:28:40.060 overlaps
00:28:41.880 with the
00:28:42.280 deep
00:28:42.480 state
00:28:42.900 then it
00:28:44.340 wasn't
00:28:44.660 them.
00:28:46.060 Because the
00:28:47.000 deep state
00:28:47.740 and the
00:28:48.000 military
00:28:48.340 industrial
00:28:48.800 complex
00:28:49.300 probably
00:28:49.980 wants
00:28:50.480 Biden
00:28:50.880 in there.
00:28:51.840 Now
00:28:52.000 unless
00:28:52.560 they figured
00:28:53.200 out
00:28:53.460 here's the
00:28:54.200 other
00:28:54.340 possibility.
00:28:54.860 The other
00:28:55.800 possibility is
00:28:56.560 that the
00:28:57.000 deep state
00:28:57.700 and the
00:28:58.080 military
00:28:58.420 industrial
00:28:58.940 complex
00:28:59.620 are working
00:29:00.800 together and
00:29:01.940 they know
00:29:02.340 that Biden
00:29:03.120 even though
00:29:03.640 Biden was
00:29:04.140 perfectly
00:29:04.660 their guy
00:29:05.280 for spending
00:29:06.560 money he
00:29:08.500 might be
00:29:09.020 declining so
00:29:09.920 much and
00:29:10.900 they know
00:29:11.440 more than
00:29:11.900 you know.
00:29:13.060 So the
00:29:13.580 people closest
00:29:14.380 to him
00:29:14.780 you know
00:29:15.020 the spooks
00:29:15.840 the CIA
00:29:16.340 they have a
00:29:17.560 much better
00:29:18.060 idea whether
00:29:18.780 Biden can
00:29:19.780 make it
00:29:20.200 another year
00:29:20.780 to the
00:29:21.080 election.
00:29:21.420 they know
00:29:22.900 you and
00:29:24.120 I don't
00:29:24.460 know
00:29:24.640 necessarily
00:29:25.180 we're
00:29:25.480 guessing
00:29:25.800 but they
00:29:26.640 know
00:29:26.940 so they
00:29:28.120 would know
00:29:28.420 his exact
00:29:29.080 medical
00:29:29.560 condition
00:29:30.080 they would
00:29:31.020 know that
00:29:31.620 when we
00:29:32.420 don't see
00:29:32.920 Biden he's
00:29:33.660 in bad
00:29:34.080 shape
00:29:34.440 they would
00:29:35.240 know what
00:29:35.640 drug they
00:29:36.140 give him
00:29:36.520 before he
00:29:37.000 goes in
00:29:37.540 public
00:29:37.920 if there
00:29:38.520 is one
00:29:38.880 right.
00:29:40.280 So they
00:29:41.160 would have
00:29:41.500 a much
00:29:41.940 more dire
00:29:42.960 opinion of
00:29:44.180 Biden
00:29:44.480 than we
00:29:45.080 do
00:29:45.360 because they
00:29:46.680 could see
00:29:47.120 it first.
00:29:49.060 We the
00:29:49.540 public are
00:29:50.140 getting you
00:29:50.640 know just
00:29:50.920 these little
00:29:51.320 glimpses
00:29:51.860 that are
00:29:52.200 horrifying
00:29:53.000 but imagine
00:29:54.280 the stuff
00:29:54.740 we don't
00:29:55.300 see.
00:29:56.860 The stuff
00:29:57.600 we see
00:29:58.020 Biden
00:29:58.400 try to
00:29:58.900 do in
00:29:59.180 public
00:29:59.440 is
00:29:59.640 horrifying
00:30:00.140 like his
00:30:01.200 lack of
00:30:01.660 cognitive
00:30:02.100 ability.
00:30:03.340 Imagine
00:30:03.840 what that
00:30:04.340 looks like
00:30:04.860 privately.
00:30:06.720 Just imagine
00:30:07.640 what he looks
00:30:08.120 like when
00:30:08.440 he's not
00:30:08.920 at his
00:30:09.280 best
00:30:09.700 when they
00:30:10.860 haven't
00:30:11.240 you know
00:30:11.560 made sure
00:30:12.520 that he
00:30:13.080 can get
00:30:13.440 a good
00:30:14.080 ten minute
00:30:14.540 speech
00:30:14.900 and get
00:30:15.180 off the
00:30:15.420 stage.
00:30:16.040 It must
00:30:16.580 be scary
00:30:17.180 behind the
00:30:18.300 scenes.
00:30:19.520 So
00:30:19.700 one
00:30:23.240 possibility
00:30:24.020 is that
00:30:24.620 it was
00:30:24.960 a
00:30:25.240 diabolical
00:30:26.220 Republican
00:30:26.840 who just
00:30:28.780 had access
00:30:29.460 to the
00:30:29.740 White House
00:30:30.060 and stuffed
00:30:30.600 it there
00:30:30.900 or bribed
00:30:32.380 the cleaning
00:30:32.900 crew to put
00:30:33.440 it there.
00:30:33.760 There's a
00:30:34.020 million ways
00:30:34.480 he could
00:30:34.700 get there.
00:30:35.620 But the
00:30:36.640 other possibility
00:30:37.280 is that the
00:30:37.780 deep state
00:30:38.280 has decided
00:30:38.920 that Biden
00:30:39.600 cannot represent
00:30:41.180 them.
00:30:42.240 It's just
00:30:42.660 he's too
00:30:43.120 far gone
00:30:43.660 and they
00:30:44.380 need a
00:30:44.740 chance of
00:30:45.140 winning
00:30:45.380 and they
00:30:45.840 need to
00:30:46.180 take him
00:30:46.660 out soon
00:30:47.160 so that
00:30:48.400 Newsom
00:30:49.020 can slot
00:30:49.660 in there
00:30:50.040 and keep
00:30:50.800 the money
00:30:51.160 rolling for
00:30:51.760 Ukraine.
00:30:53.580 So
00:30:53.860 having now
00:30:55.920 heard this
00:30:56.580 hypothesis
00:30:57.920 it's just
00:30:58.840 a hypothesis
00:30:59.460 how likely
00:31:01.360 does it seem
00:31:01.980 to you
00:31:02.260 that it
00:31:02.500 was planted?
00:31:04.440 Go.
00:31:05.360 Have I
00:31:05.660 convinced anybody?
00:31:06.520 How likely
00:31:07.280 it was planted?
00:31:08.200 We don't know
00:31:08.720 we wouldn't
00:31:09.260 know who
00:31:09.740 but how likely
00:31:10.940 it was planted.
00:31:12.180 I'm seeing a lot
00:31:12.600 of zeros
00:31:12.980 and 25s.
00:31:14.480 Interesting.
00:31:15.960 The 25
00:31:16.700 you're probably
00:31:17.080 joking but
00:31:17.780 I don't know
00:31:22.080 would you
00:31:22.980 take cocaine
00:31:23.840 out of your
00:31:24.540 pocket if you
00:31:25.280 were in the
00:31:25.820 White House?
00:31:28.480 Would you?
00:31:29.160 Would you
00:31:29.480 take it out
00:31:29.900 of your
00:31:30.080 pocket?
00:31:32.000 And if you
00:31:32.680 took it out
00:31:33.100 of your
00:31:33.260 pocket and
00:31:33.700 you used
00:31:34.100 it wouldn't
00:31:35.380 it be the
00:31:35.860 highest priority
00:31:36.760 you were
00:31:37.160 thinking about
00:31:37.800 to not get
00:31:38.380 caught?
00:31:39.380 And you
00:31:39.820 know you
00:31:40.020 look around
00:31:40.480 your space
00:31:40.980 before you
00:31:41.420 left?
00:31:42.940 I don't know
00:31:43.240 it's possible
00:31:44.420 that a
00:31:45.880 druggie
00:31:46.360 could leave
00:31:46.880 some drugs.
00:31:47.740 It's very
00:31:48.140 possible.
00:31:49.140 Druggies forget
00:31:49.780 stuff they leave
00:31:50.500 drugs.
00:31:51.060 Hunter's a
00:31:51.460 perfect example.
00:31:52.640 But if you
00:31:53.040 compare the
00:31:53.720 odds of that
00:31:54.360 happening at
00:31:54.980 the exact
00:31:56.220 time.
00:31:57.780 Alright here's a
00:31:58.440 better way to
00:31:58.800 say it.
00:31:59.440 If you said to
00:32:00.080 me Scott
00:32:00.600 there was one
00:32:01.680 time over the
00:32:02.340 course of the
00:32:02.900 four year
00:32:03.340 administration
00:32:03.920 that Hunter
00:32:04.520 left some
00:32:05.000 cocaine in the
00:32:05.700 White House
00:32:06.300 I would say
00:32:07.260 the odds of
00:32:07.800 that pretty
00:32:08.640 good.
00:32:09.860 Pretty good.
00:32:11.580 But if you
00:32:12.880 say to me
00:32:13.380 that over
00:32:13.780 that four
00:32:14.420 year term
00:32:15.120 just this
00:32:16.220 one week
00:32:17.020 where Hunter
00:32:18.200 the story
00:32:18.800 was that
00:32:19.160 Hunter's
00:32:19.500 back in the
00:32:19.960 White House
00:32:20.300 just that
00:32:20.680 one week
00:32:21.280 that's the
00:32:22.520 week that
00:32:24.000 he left
00:32:24.480 right after
00:32:25.220 his plea
00:32:25.620 deal.
00:32:26.280 That's the
00:32:26.860 week he's
00:32:27.220 going to
00:32:27.380 leave a
00:32:27.660 bag of
00:32:28.020 cocaine in
00:32:28.520 the White
00:32:28.760 House.
00:32:30.220 You're
00:32:30.700 going to
00:32:30.820 accept that
00:32:31.300 coincidence?
00:32:32.540 Because that
00:32:33.220 coincidence is
00:32:34.300 galactic in
00:32:35.760 size.
00:32:36.800 You know
00:32:37.100 that right?
00:32:37.600 That's like
00:32:38.120 a one in
00:32:38.540 thousand.
00:32:39.620 So I think
00:32:40.040 there's a
00:32:40.360 one in
00:32:40.660 one thousand
00:32:41.180 chance it's
00:32:41.880 a coincidence.
00:32:43.440 So it
00:32:43.920 wouldn't be
00:32:44.380 unusual for
00:32:45.080 him to
00:32:45.320 leave a
00:32:45.680 bag of
00:32:46.040 drugs.
00:32:46.700 We all
00:32:47.120 agree with
00:32:47.540 that right?
00:32:48.520 If I
00:32:48.880 said four
00:32:49.440 years has
00:32:50.900 Hunter ever
00:32:52.000 left a
00:32:52.420 drug in
00:32:52.780 the White
00:32:53.020 House?
00:32:53.940 Most of
00:32:54.480 you would
00:32:54.720 probably say
00:32:55.340 maybe.
00:32:56.440 Like good
00:32:57.080 chance.
00:32:58.140 At least
00:32:58.540 once.
00:33:00.040 But then I
00:33:00.560 narrow that
00:33:01.020 four years
00:33:02.160 down to that
00:33:02.680 one week.
00:33:03.560 The one
00:33:04.160 worst time
00:33:05.240 it could have
00:33:05.680 happened.
00:33:06.300 No worse
00:33:07.360 time than
00:33:07.900 this one
00:33:08.360 week.
00:33:08.600 And that's
00:33:08.860 the week
00:33:09.060 you did
00:33:09.320 it, right?
00:33:10.600 Sorry.
00:33:12.020 Sorry.
00:33:13.400 Two on
00:33:13.840 the nose.
00:33:15.860 I think it
00:33:16.680 was planted.
00:33:19.720 Boom.
00:33:21.200 All right.
00:33:23.020 I would not,
00:33:23.720 let's say,
00:33:24.180 I'll put a,
00:33:24.780 let me put a
00:33:26.640 percentage
00:33:27.500 confidence on
00:33:28.800 that.
00:33:29.020 60%.
00:33:30.020 60%.
00:33:30.500 60%.
00:33:32.820 40%.
00:33:34.240 It's just
00:33:35.120 some person
00:33:36.340 who dropped
00:33:36.740 some drugs.
00:33:38.660 Yeah.
00:33:38.920 40% is
00:33:39.760 something
00:33:40.020 completely
00:33:40.500 ordinary.
00:33:42.100 60%.
00:33:42.740 That's too
00:33:43.240 much of a
00:33:43.660 coincidence.
00:33:45.180 Too much
00:33:45.480 of a
00:33:45.700 coincidence.
00:33:49.520 Coke addicts
00:33:50.400 do it for
00:33:50.740 white.
00:33:51.000 No, I'm not
00:33:51.520 saying the
00:33:53.560 Hunter only
00:33:54.240 did one
00:33:54.720 week of
00:33:55.180 Coke.
00:33:55.620 did you
00:33:57.000 hear that?
00:33:58.280 No, we
00:33:58.780 assume that
00:33:59.420 addicts are
00:34:00.080 addicts.
00:34:02.320 It's like
00:34:02.940 you've never
00:34:03.280 heard of an
00:34:03.720 addict.
00:34:04.460 An addict
00:34:04.840 is somebody
00:34:05.260 who always
00:34:05.960 could do
00:34:06.320 Coke, no
00:34:07.280 matter how
00:34:07.720 long they've
00:34:08.260 not been
00:34:08.780 doing it.
00:34:09.900 That's what
00:34:10.400 an addict
00:34:10.760 is.
00:34:11.140 Somebody
00:34:11.360 who's just
00:34:13.020 sort of
00:34:13.340 reflexively
00:34:14.060 can drop
00:34:14.600 into that
00:34:15.040 without much
00:34:15.520 effort.
00:34:17.900 All right.
00:34:18.360 So it
00:34:18.980 could be
00:34:19.300 exactly what
00:34:19.860 happened.
00:34:20.680 So let
00:34:21.360 me say
00:34:22.260 clearly, it
00:34:23.780 could be
00:34:24.240 Hunter's
00:34:24.720 Wheat.
00:34:25.100 It could
00:34:25.400 be Hunter's
00:34:26.060 Coke.
00:34:27.080 It could
00:34:27.460 be somebody
00:34:27.900 else's.
00:34:29.200 I just
00:34:29.660 think there's
00:34:30.080 a slightly
00:34:30.620 more chance
00:34:31.340 that that
00:34:31.720 coincidence is
00:34:32.520 not a
00:34:32.840 coincidence.
00:34:34.140 You have
00:34:34.500 to believe
00:34:34.840 in a lot
00:34:35.280 of coincidence
00:34:35.800 for that
00:34:36.560 to be the
00:34:37.620 case.
00:34:39.280 All right.
00:34:41.660 Where is
00:34:42.380 Pregosian?
00:34:43.700 So today,
00:34:44.560 finally, CNN
00:34:45.300 and Reuters
00:34:46.200 and others,
00:34:47.700 Wall Street
00:34:48.080 Journal, have
00:34:48.620 decided that
00:34:49.480 now they
00:34:50.600 can say,
00:34:51.820 hey, I
00:34:53.800 thought we
00:34:54.220 would have
00:34:54.520 seen a picture
00:34:55.040 of him in
00:34:55.620 Belarus by
00:34:56.480 now.
00:34:58.880 And then
00:34:59.540 the Belarusian
00:35:00.680 leader,
00:35:02.000 Louchenko,
00:35:03.300 finally said
00:35:04.120 directly, he's
00:35:04.960 not in
00:35:05.300 Belarus.
00:35:07.060 Said it
00:35:07.480 directly, he's
00:35:08.540 not in
00:35:08.820 Belarus.
00:35:09.600 He thought he
00:35:10.060 might be in
00:35:10.500 St.
00:35:10.760 Petersburg,
00:35:11.380 unless he's
00:35:11.900 already gone
00:35:12.300 to Moscow.
00:35:14.340 Yeah.
00:35:14.980 Because I'm
00:35:15.640 sure that
00:35:16.860 Pregosian would
00:35:17.580 feel pretty
00:35:18.480 safe in
00:35:19.000 Moscow,
00:35:19.340 wouldn't he?
00:35:20.460 Wouldn't he?
00:35:20.940 No, he's
00:35:23.520 not.
00:35:23.700 I don't
00:35:23.940 know if
00:35:24.220 he's dead
00:35:24.680 because Putin
00:35:25.980 needs him
00:35:26.360 alive to
00:35:26.900 find out
00:35:27.280 who the
00:35:27.580 other
00:35:27.800 plotters
00:35:28.300 were.
00:35:29.160 So part
00:35:29.640 of the
00:35:29.860 story is
00:35:30.460 there are
00:35:30.660 lots of
00:35:30.980 plotters.
00:35:32.140 Now,
00:35:33.080 the reason
00:35:35.580 I do this
00:35:36.260 live stream,
00:35:37.380 besides the
00:35:38.060 fun of it,
00:35:38.620 which is
00:35:38.940 maybe the
00:35:39.500 biggest reason,
00:35:40.580 is that I
00:35:42.160 like to make
00:35:42.700 predictions,
00:35:43.740 especially
00:35:44.220 predictions that
00:35:45.020 are not being
00:35:45.500 made by the
00:35:46.220 others.
00:35:46.520 And then
00:35:48.080 you judge
00:35:49.240 the quality
00:35:49.800 of my
00:35:50.160 live streams,
00:35:51.000 or you
00:35:51.340 should,
00:35:52.380 by how
00:35:52.840 often I
00:35:53.320 get a
00:35:53.600 prediction
00:35:53.880 right.
00:35:55.500 Tell me
00:35:55.980 who else
00:35:56.520 said the
00:35:57.440 Pregosian
00:35:57.960 did not
00:35:58.440 go to
00:35:58.740 Belarus.
00:35:59.520 Name
00:35:59.720 one other
00:36:00.060 person.
00:36:00.840 Name
00:36:01.160 one other
00:36:01.600 person in
00:36:02.260 the entire
00:36:02.840 world,
00:36:04.020 let's say
00:36:04.520 who does
00:36:04.880 this,
00:36:05.720 does a
00:36:06.200 public
00:36:06.600 kind of
00:36:06.980 thing.
00:36:07.580 Not
00:36:07.880 one.
00:36:09.780 Posobiec?
00:36:10.860 Yeah,
00:36:11.220 okay.
00:36:12.680 Jack probably
00:36:13.520 was on it
00:36:13.960 early,
00:36:14.360 I'll give
00:36:14.680 you that.
00:36:16.520 All right,
00:36:18.800 so finally,
00:36:22.680 finally the
00:36:23.580 mainstream
00:36:24.020 media caught
00:36:25.620 up to a
00:36:26.320 guy on
00:36:26.760 Twitter who
00:36:27.440 just looks
00:36:27.920 at it and
00:36:28.280 says,
00:36:28.560 well,
00:36:28.760 obviously,
00:36:29.980 obviously
00:36:30.540 Putin can't
00:36:31.480 let him
00:36:31.760 go.
00:36:32.920 He's got to
00:36:33.460 keep him
00:36:33.860 until he
00:36:34.220 finds out
00:36:34.660 who the
00:36:34.940 other
00:36:35.160 traders are.
00:36:35.940 Of course.
00:36:36.800 That's just
00:36:37.240 basic
00:36:37.680 dictatoring.
00:36:39.440 Like,
00:36:39.680 that's the
00:36:39.980 most,
00:36:40.780 that's got
00:36:41.480 to be like
00:36:41.940 dictator 101.
00:36:44.620 First you
00:36:45.260 get a hold
00:36:45.700 of your
00:36:45.940 critic,
00:36:46.520 and then
00:36:47.120 you find
00:36:47.520 out what
00:36:47.920 else the
00:36:48.340 critic knows
00:36:49.020 that you
00:36:49.340 need to
00:36:49.660 know,
00:36:50.020 and then
00:36:50.300 you kill
00:36:50.680 them.
00:36:51.440 It's like
00:36:51.820 just basic.
00:36:52.740 It's the
00:36:52.980 most basic
00:36:53.580 dictatoring you
00:36:54.380 could do.
00:36:54.980 I'll tell you
00:36:55.420 what you
00:36:55.680 don't do.
00:36:57.000 Lushenko
00:36:57.400 was funny.
00:36:58.700 Lushenko
00:36:59.080 said it's
00:36:59.660 ridiculous to
00:37:00.420 imagine that
00:37:01.560 Putin would
00:37:02.080 want to get
00:37:02.540 revenge on
00:37:03.380 Prigozhin for
00:37:04.360 just trying to
00:37:04.940 kill him and
00:37:05.380 take over the
00:37:05.820 country.
00:37:07.100 I mean,
00:37:08.100 Putin?
00:37:09.360 Putin's not
00:37:09.960 kind of a
00:37:10.640 revengeful guy.
00:37:12.320 I mean,
00:37:12.740 what history do
00:37:13.580 we have of
00:37:14.100 Putin ever
00:37:14.660 trying to
00:37:15.700 attack a
00:37:16.240 critic?
00:37:20.140 It's just
00:37:20.840 funny listening
00:37:21.420 to the,
00:37:22.500 what would
00:37:24.380 you call
00:37:24.700 Lushenko?
00:37:25.880 Listening to
00:37:26.580 the puppets
00:37:27.260 talk.
00:37:28.620 It's hilariously
00:37:30.060 implausible,
00:37:31.500 anything they
00:37:32.180 say.
00:37:33.340 Even more so
00:37:34.240 than American
00:37:34.720 politics,
00:37:35.260 just hilariously
00:37:36.260 implausible.
00:37:36.900 All right,
00:37:38.820 so just
00:37:42.880 remember this
00:37:44.000 story.
00:37:44.920 Remember the
00:37:45.680 part where
00:37:46.320 Scott, who
00:37:48.660 has zero
00:37:49.760 military or
00:37:52.180 geopolitical
00:37:53.160 experience,
00:37:54.120 you'd all
00:37:54.480 agree,
00:37:54.860 right?
00:37:55.460 No military
00:37:56.120 experience,
00:37:57.220 no geopolitical
00:37:58.380 experience,
00:37:59.140 but I'm the
00:37:59.660 only one who
00:38:00.040 got that
00:38:00.360 right.
00:38:01.460 And it's
00:38:01.860 not the
00:38:02.200 first time
00:38:02.780 I'm the
00:38:03.060 only one
00:38:03.360 who got
00:38:03.620 some things
00:38:04.100 right.
00:38:04.380 Now, I'm
00:38:05.380 saying this
00:38:05.900 partly to
00:38:06.640 brag, because
00:38:07.940 it's useful
00:38:08.480 for telling
00:38:09.500 people why
00:38:09.960 they should
00:38:10.260 watch the
00:38:10.660 show, but
00:38:11.980 it's going
00:38:12.800 to tie into
00:38:13.380 a point
00:38:14.080 that's
00:38:14.360 upcoming.
00:38:15.460 So just
00:38:15.740 put a
00:38:16.000 little tack
00:38:17.440 in that,
00:38:18.660 that I got
00:38:19.360 a few things
00:38:19.860 right, okay?
00:38:21.140 That'll come
00:38:21.560 back later.
00:38:23.060 All right,
00:38:23.340 let's talk
00:38:23.620 about Ukraine.
00:38:26.140 What did
00:38:26.900 I predict
00:38:27.560 is happening
00:38:29.280 with the
00:38:30.380 counter-offensive?
00:38:31.780 Do you
00:38:32.220 remember what
00:38:32.620 I said was
00:38:33.140 going to
00:38:33.340 happen with
00:38:34.300 the
00:38:34.440 counter-offensive?
00:38:37.140 I said
00:38:38.140 the war
00:38:38.860 is already
00:38:39.320 over, because
00:38:40.720 nobody's going
00:38:41.380 anywhere.
00:38:43.720 There's not
00:38:45.280 going to be
00:38:45.580 much land
00:38:46.200 that's traded
00:38:46.800 after this
00:38:47.480 point, unless
00:38:48.080 it's by
00:38:48.440 negotiation.
00:38:50.020 I said
00:38:50.880 the war
00:38:51.300 is over,
00:38:51.840 we're into
00:38:52.200 the hard
00:38:52.600 negotiation that
00:38:54.120 happens to
00:38:54.700 involve killing
00:38:55.460 each other.
00:38:56.740 But neither
00:38:57.800 side can win.
00:39:00.200 The winning
00:39:00.880 is just off
00:39:01.700 the table.
00:39:02.720 So the
00:39:03.100 news has
00:39:03.540 finally caught
00:39:04.100 up to
00:39:04.380 me.
00:39:05.440 Now, have
00:39:05.740 I mentioned
00:39:06.160 that I have
00:39:06.660 no military
00:39:07.360 experience?
00:39:08.240 I think I
00:39:08.900 did, just a
00:39:09.480 minute ago.
00:39:10.860 No military
00:39:11.840 experience, but
00:39:13.000 I told you
00:39:13.640 weeks ago,
00:39:14.660 there's no
00:39:15.160 war.
00:39:16.360 They're
00:39:16.720 basically in
00:39:17.700 place, and
00:39:19.060 they're just
00:39:19.380 waiting for a
00:39:20.020 Republican
00:39:20.360 president or
00:39:21.200 something.
00:39:22.520 But it's
00:39:23.660 not really
00:39:24.260 going to
00:39:24.680 change any,
00:39:25.960 you know,
00:39:26.280 no leadership
00:39:27.120 looks like it's
00:39:27.860 going to
00:39:28.100 change, no
00:39:29.180 property looks
00:39:29.900 like it's much
00:39:30.460 going to
00:39:30.720 change, and
00:39:31.320 that's what the
00:39:31.780 news is
00:39:32.120 reporting.
00:39:33.200 So the
00:39:33.800 news has
00:39:34.180 caught up
00:39:34.520 with me, and
00:39:35.680 they're saying,
00:39:36.340 ah, looks like
00:39:37.000 a stalemate.
00:39:38.540 The Russians
00:39:39.460 did too good a
00:39:40.240 job of digging
00:39:40.780 in.
00:39:41.600 The Ukrainians,
00:39:42.460 of course, say
00:39:43.100 they don't have
00:39:43.680 the weapons they
00:39:44.880 need.
00:39:46.240 Blah, blah,
00:39:46.980 blah.
00:39:47.560 All right.
00:39:47.900 So I saw a
00:39:48.900 tweet by David
00:39:50.120 Sachs, again, if
00:39:52.720 you don't follow
00:39:53.420 David Sachs on
00:39:54.940 Twitter, you're
00:39:55.500 missing a lot,
00:39:56.920 because he's got
00:39:57.500 some good
00:39:57.940 contrarian takes,
00:39:59.880 contrarian against
00:40:01.360 the, let's say,
00:40:02.700 the military
00:40:03.240 industrial complex,
00:40:05.400 contrarian against
00:40:06.540 them.
00:40:07.440 So he notes that
00:40:08.500 there's this
00:40:09.080 colonel in the
00:40:09.940 Australian Armed
00:40:10.580 Forces who's
00:40:11.500 involved in the
00:40:12.060 Ukrainian stuff,
00:40:13.920 and he makes
00:40:15.220 three points.
00:40:15.960 The offensive has
00:40:16.780 failed.
00:40:17.900 So that's from
00:40:19.420 somebody who's
00:40:19.940 there.
00:40:20.900 Somebody on our
00:40:21.820 side, you know,
00:40:22.680 NATO, says the
00:40:24.820 offensive has
00:40:25.400 failed.
00:40:26.340 Not that it's just
00:40:27.380 starting, not that
00:40:28.360 we're seeing the
00:40:28.980 beginning, not that
00:40:30.700 if they keep pushing
00:40:31.720 it'll be good.
00:40:32.800 It just failed.
00:40:34.860 So basically,
00:40:37.340 according to this
00:40:37.960 colonel, who is
00:40:39.340 involved, it
00:40:41.340 failed.
00:40:42.520 Now, of course,
00:40:43.440 Zelensky say,
00:40:44.600 we're just getting
00:40:45.200 started.
00:40:46.360 So Zelensky is
00:40:47.140 sort of like that
00:40:47.740 night in, you
00:40:49.200 know, Monty
00:40:49.640 Python, after his
00:40:51.040 arms and legs get
00:40:51.920 caught off.
00:40:53.500 Come on here, I'm
00:40:54.840 just getting started.
00:40:56.680 Number two, this is
00:40:58.640 from the, remember,
00:40:59.620 this is from somebody
00:41:00.460 in NATO.
00:41:01.820 NATO military
00:41:02.700 tactics do not
00:41:03.820 work against Russian
00:41:04.760 defenses.
00:41:08.200 What?
00:41:10.940 Wait, what?
00:41:11.760 That's exactly what
00:41:14.260 Sachs tweeted.
00:41:16.720 Wait, what?
00:41:19.120 Doesn't that get your
00:41:20.160 attention?
00:41:21.560 NATO tactics don't
00:41:22.960 work against Russian
00:41:24.020 defenses, at least on
00:41:25.920 the ground.
00:41:27.380 Wow.
00:41:29.820 And then, number
00:41:31.160 three, the colonel
00:41:32.280 expects limited
00:41:33.220 successes along the
00:41:34.480 front line, but no
00:41:36.100 major breakthroughs.
00:41:38.220 None.
00:41:38.640 No breakthroughs.
00:41:41.440 Just minor, a little,
00:41:42.440 you know, block
00:41:43.000 air block there.
00:41:44.460 So we're now at
00:41:45.660 exactly the place that
00:41:47.560 I told you we would
00:41:48.440 be.
00:41:50.880 How many of you would
00:41:52.060 be willing to say I
00:41:53.040 predicted that
00:41:53.700 correctly?
00:41:55.300 Right?
00:41:55.700 Again, the context is
00:41:57.640 not just my ego, which
00:41:59.880 I love, you know.
00:42:00.940 Anybody wants to say I
00:42:02.280 did well, I like that.
00:42:04.280 Everybody likes
00:42:05.020 compliments.
00:42:05.480 Everybody likes to be
00:42:06.540 right.
00:42:07.280 But a larger purpose
00:42:09.100 here is I want to show
00:42:10.780 you that non-experts can
00:42:12.440 be right.
00:42:14.080 Would you buy the, do
00:42:16.080 you buy at this point,
00:42:17.200 especially after the
00:42:18.000 pandemic, do you buy
00:42:19.840 the notion that non-
00:42:21.520 experts can completely
00:42:23.360 beat the experts and
00:42:25.120 routinely?
00:42:26.260 It's not even unusual.
00:42:27.760 And it's not something
00:42:28.740 limited to me.
00:42:30.180 I know you can agree with
00:42:31.460 that, right?
00:42:32.220 I'm not the one person
00:42:33.740 who did better than the
00:42:35.240 experts.
00:42:36.240 I'm one of many people
00:42:38.360 who did better than the
00:42:40.060 experts.
00:42:40.720 Many of us.
00:42:41.880 That's the bigger story.
00:42:42.940 It's not about me.
00:42:44.420 Right?
00:42:44.580 The bigger story is that
00:42:45.580 the experts are garbage.
00:42:47.520 So after David Sachs
00:42:49.460 tweets this, pointing
00:42:50.780 out that it was this
00:42:52.240 colonel in the
00:42:53.400 Australian, oh, I'm
00:42:54.880 sorry, I kept saying
00:42:55.680 Australian, Austrian.
00:42:57.980 So correct everything I
00:42:59.820 said.
00:43:00.080 It's Austrian, not
00:43:01.260 Australian.
00:43:01.680 Austrian armed
00:43:03.640 forces, which would
00:43:05.680 explain why he's in
00:43:06.400 NATO.
00:43:07.600 Makes a lot more sense
00:43:08.680 now.
00:43:09.880 If you get rid of the
00:43:10.900 Australian part, it
00:43:11.720 makes a little more
00:43:12.220 sense.
00:43:12.700 Wait, is Australia in
00:43:13.960 NATO?
00:43:17.500 Austria is not in
00:43:18.500 NATO?
00:43:19.320 What is Australia
00:43:19.860 is?
00:43:22.280 Do me some quick
00:43:23.780 fact-checking.
00:43:27.120 Neither is.
00:43:28.180 Somebody says
00:43:28.740 neither.
00:43:29.100 Well, somehow this
00:43:32.140 colonel is involved in
00:43:33.380 some way.
00:43:34.160 So I guess I don't know
00:43:34.880 the details, but he
00:43:35.660 sounds like he knows
00:43:36.280 what he's talking
00:43:36.720 about.
00:43:37.920 So after David Sachs
00:43:39.460 makes this tweet, in
00:43:40.520 which he's literally
00:43:41.340 quoting this colonel,
00:43:43.860 somebody named Aki
00:43:45.800 Kako tweets back and
00:43:47.940 replies to David Sachs.
00:43:49.180 He goes, and I'd like
00:43:50.540 to do this with as much
00:43:51.560 attitude as the tweet
00:43:53.400 seems to have.
00:43:54.140 So to get the right
00:43:55.520 attitude, I'd like to
00:43:58.180 invite Dale to join
00:44:00.640 us.
00:44:02.260 Dale, could you read
00:44:03.800 the tweet by Aki
00:44:05.320 Kako?
00:44:07.420 Glad to do it.
00:44:11.600 David, no, Dale,
00:44:13.920 could you, more
00:44:14.940 condescending.
00:44:16.460 We need lots of
00:44:17.660 condescending.
00:44:18.920 More condescending.
00:44:19.980 Got it.
00:44:20.520 Got it.
00:44:20.800 All right, how
00:44:24.580 about this?
00:44:26.320 David, I am curious
00:44:28.660 to learn about your
00:44:31.240 extensive military
00:44:33.080 background and the
00:44:34.340 comprehensive range of
00:44:36.020 your military experience.
00:44:40.880 Could you kindly share
00:44:42.580 with me the specific
00:44:44.700 details, the specific
00:44:46.260 details and noteworthy
00:44:48.000 aspects of your time
00:44:49.420 serving in the military?
00:44:50.800 Bingo.
00:44:54.400 Zing.
00:44:55.500 Zing.
00:44:56.640 Got him.
00:45:06.100 To which my
00:45:07.980 response was,
00:45:10.180 there's still people
00:45:11.760 who believe the
00:45:12.400 experts?
00:45:16.020 Let's form a
00:45:16.960 contest.
00:45:18.140 And the contest
00:45:18.820 will be this.
00:45:19.540 It will be a
00:45:20.800 betting forum
00:45:21.700 for things in
00:45:23.480 the future.
00:45:25.080 All right, it's a
00:45:25.460 betting forum.
00:45:26.380 And you only get
00:45:27.220 two bets,
00:45:28.900 two possibilities.
00:45:30.160 You either bet
00:45:31.160 that the military
00:45:32.480 industrial complex
00:45:33.560 is telling you the
00:45:34.300 truth on some
00:45:35.260 specific issue,
00:45:36.640 or you bet that
00:45:37.720 David Sachs has a
00:45:39.280 more accurate take.
00:45:40.200 and there's lots of
00:45:43.660 different iterations,
00:45:44.360 lots of different
00:45:45.120 bets.
00:45:46.880 Now, I'm not going to
00:45:47.900 say that David Sachs
00:45:48.760 will be right on every
00:45:49.980 take.
00:45:50.860 Nobody is.
00:45:52.580 But do you really
00:45:53.660 think he's not
00:45:54.360 killing the experts?
00:45:56.580 He's been destroying
00:45:57.980 the experts.
00:45:59.620 Just that one person.
00:46:01.580 He's been destroying
00:46:02.800 the experts on a whole
00:46:04.360 bunch of stuff.
00:46:05.540 It's not just the
00:46:06.440 Ukraine war.
00:46:07.100 He's been more
00:46:08.540 right than people
00:46:09.540 have a right to be
00:46:10.320 right about anything.
00:46:13.720 How do people not
00:46:15.060 notice?
00:46:16.520 How do you not
00:46:17.040 notice that there's
00:46:17.800 somebody who's just
00:46:18.380 right all the time?
00:46:19.580 Just like consistently
00:46:20.480 right.
00:46:21.300 And the experts are
00:46:22.600 like, whoa.
00:46:25.600 It's a weird world.
00:46:27.340 All right.
00:46:27.600 You were probably
00:46:30.860 aware that until
00:46:31.880 the Supreme Court's
00:46:33.080 more recent rulings
00:46:34.380 that the Supreme
00:46:36.560 Court would be an
00:46:37.140 issue in the 2024
00:46:37.980 election because of
00:46:39.900 abortion and Roe
00:46:42.120 versus Wade.
00:46:43.560 And you think that
00:46:44.600 will still be fresh
00:46:45.500 and the Democrats
00:46:46.260 will make a big deal
00:46:47.080 about it, because
00:46:48.140 they did in the
00:46:50.140 prior election.
00:46:51.420 So we kind of
00:46:52.180 expect that.
00:46:53.540 But I saw a good
00:46:55.280 warning.
00:46:56.160 I think it was in
00:46:57.020 the Wall Street
00:46:57.580 Journal, an opinion
00:46:58.420 piece, that the
00:47:02.100 Democrats better be
00:47:03.040 careful if they take
00:47:04.480 on the Supreme
00:47:05.140 Court, because the
00:47:06.680 Supreme Court's vote
00:47:07.800 on affirmative action
00:47:09.160 is actually popular,
00:47:11.940 like the majority of
00:47:12.920 the country agrees
00:47:13.700 with the Supreme
00:47:14.300 Court.
00:47:14.580 and the ruling
00:47:16.540 on student loan
00:47:18.220 relief is also
00:47:20.240 favored by a
00:47:21.600 majority, that,
00:47:23.300 you know, not
00:47:23.760 doing it.
00:47:24.820 And, more to the
00:47:26.200 point, the people
00:47:27.920 who are most
00:47:28.600 against student
00:47:30.060 loan forgiveness
00:47:30.720 were older
00:47:31.580 public, you know,
00:47:33.280 part of the public
00:47:33.820 that's older, and
00:47:35.380 they're more likely
00:47:35.940 to vote.
00:47:37.200 So it turns out
00:47:38.240 that the abortion
00:47:40.380 issue, I think,
00:47:41.340 is going to get a
00:47:42.120 little bit stale
00:47:43.180 by 2024.
00:47:45.920 Because the
00:47:47.880 Republicans have
00:47:48.640 the ultimate
00:47:49.100 answer to that.
00:47:50.940 We kicked it to
00:47:52.220 the states, so it's
00:47:53.460 closer to you, the
00:47:54.520 individual.
00:47:55.740 You want the
00:47:56.500 decision to be as
00:47:57.400 close to the
00:47:58.020 individual as
00:47:58.640 possible, and while
00:48:00.340 we certainly have
00:48:01.060 opinions about what
00:48:02.100 should and should
00:48:02.680 not be legal, we
00:48:03.980 think the federal
00:48:04.640 government should get
00:48:05.460 out of it.
00:48:06.540 So you're not
00:48:07.320 really arguing about
00:48:08.120 abortion.
00:48:08.480 you're arguing
00:48:10.120 about whether you
00:48:10.980 should make the
00:48:11.520 decision close to
00:48:12.940 the public or
00:48:13.700 farther from the
00:48:14.440 public.
00:48:15.880 That's our only
00:48:16.720 point.
00:48:17.380 So this would be
00:48:17.900 the Republican
00:48:18.440 take.
00:48:19.160 The only thing
00:48:19.900 we're asking is
00:48:21.400 that you get more
00:48:22.200 involved in your
00:48:22.900 own decisions.
00:48:25.060 Get more involved
00:48:26.340 in your own life.
00:48:28.280 That's what we're
00:48:28.920 asking.
00:48:29.880 We're asking that
00:48:30.640 you don't let the
00:48:31.260 federal government
00:48:31.960 make decisions that
00:48:32.940 you should be
00:48:33.400 making.
00:48:34.380 Make it as close
00:48:35.420 to your local
00:48:36.260 government as you
00:48:37.660 can, and then
00:48:38.740 you're going to
00:48:39.100 feel the most
00:48:39.580 comfortable with
00:48:40.300 it, and people
00:48:41.280 will get different
00:48:41.860 answers in different
00:48:42.540 states.
00:48:43.440 Now that's a pretty
00:48:44.380 good defense.
00:48:46.280 I haven't heard any
00:48:47.100 Republicans say it
00:48:47.940 the way I said it.
00:48:49.020 They do say it, but
00:48:50.400 they don't say it
00:48:51.000 cleanly, and they
00:48:52.200 don't package it
00:48:53.420 well.
00:48:54.600 But it's a perfect
00:48:55.780 defense because it
00:48:57.600 actually gives people
00:48:58.440 more of what they
00:48:59.180 want instead of less,
00:49:00.260 or at least you
00:49:00.740 can phrase it like
00:49:03.320 that.
00:49:04.500 You can still have
00:49:05.400 your abortion.
00:49:05.880 You might have to
00:49:07.500 move to a state
00:49:09.540 where people agree
00:49:10.280 with you, but if
00:49:11.760 you live in a state
00:49:12.500 where the people
00:49:13.020 around you don't
00:49:13.960 want it, is that
00:49:16.560 our problem?
00:49:17.780 Is that the federal
00:49:18.760 government's problem
00:49:19.600 that your neighbors
00:49:20.540 don't like abortion?
00:49:23.580 It's a pretty easy
00:49:24.720 sell that you need
00:49:26.080 to work it out at
00:49:26.760 the state level, and
00:49:27.860 that that's all the
00:49:28.900 Supreme Court did.
00:49:29.740 In my opinion, that
00:49:30.520 is all they did.
00:49:31.660 I don't think they
00:49:32.500 ruled on abortion
00:49:33.240 whatsoever.
00:49:33.920 They just said
00:49:36.860 whose authority it
00:49:37.900 was.
00:49:38.800 So, I do think
00:49:41.460 that the Supreme
00:49:42.180 Court, which I
00:49:42.980 thought was going
00:49:43.620 to be the biggest
00:49:44.300 problem for
00:49:45.240 Republicans, might
00:49:46.880 have actually
00:49:47.360 reversed in terms
00:49:48.560 of its impact if
00:49:51.560 the Republicans can,
00:49:54.040 let's say, elegantly
00:49:55.240 handle the abortion
00:49:56.200 question.
00:49:57.120 And they should,
00:49:58.520 because it's right
00:49:59.100 there.
00:49:59.540 I mean, it's right
00:50:00.100 there for them to
00:50:00.720 take.
00:50:01.080 It's free money.
00:50:01.820 It's just sitting on
00:50:02.440 the table.
00:50:02.800 You just have to
00:50:03.940 pick it up.
00:50:05.160 Don't tell us what
00:50:06.040 you think about a
00:50:07.220 fetus.
00:50:08.380 Do not care.
00:50:09.860 The best thing that
00:50:10.700 Trump could say about
00:50:11.520 this, or let's say
00:50:12.520 any Republican is,
00:50:14.200 why do you care about
00:50:15.320 my opinion about
00:50:16.200 abortion?
00:50:17.680 I care about your
00:50:18.740 opinion about abortion.
00:50:20.380 Oh, that's good.
00:50:22.140 Shit, that's good.
00:50:24.820 Imagine you being
00:50:25.660 president, and you
00:50:26.260 say, why do you care
00:50:27.100 about my opinion of
00:50:28.060 abortion?
00:50:28.580 You should care about
00:50:29.360 yours, because that's
00:50:30.140 what I care about.
00:50:30.800 I care about your
00:50:32.120 opinion about abortion.
00:50:33.600 I'm not going to have
00:50:34.320 a baby.
00:50:36.080 Now, look at me.
00:50:37.560 I'm not going to have
00:50:38.220 a baby, but you
00:50:39.140 might.
00:50:40.160 Your opinion on
00:50:40.940 abortion is critical
00:50:42.200 and vital to me.
00:50:44.760 My opinion on
00:50:45.640 abortion should be
00:50:46.440 zero interest to you
00:50:47.560 from the federal
00:50:48.620 government.
00:50:49.940 Work it out at the
00:50:50.600 state.
00:50:51.680 Isn't that strong?
00:50:53.660 Now, that's, you
00:50:54.640 know, sort of
00:50:55.180 political narrative-y,
00:50:57.300 persuasion-y.
00:50:58.060 I mean, it's not
00:50:58.720 based on truth, per
00:51:00.080 se.
00:51:00.620 It's just persuasion.
00:51:02.880 But you would love
00:51:04.080 any politician who
00:51:05.200 said, stop asking my
00:51:06.560 opinion about your
00:51:07.360 body.
00:51:08.860 Oh, that's even
00:51:09.840 better.
00:51:10.600 Oh, my God, that's
00:51:11.300 even better.
00:51:12.360 Stop asking my
00:51:13.460 opinion about your
00:51:14.440 body.
00:51:16.360 That's the end of
00:51:17.340 it.
00:51:18.200 That would end the
00:51:19.180 debate.
00:51:20.540 Stop asking my
00:51:21.560 opinion about your
00:51:22.420 body.
00:51:23.940 Wow.
00:51:24.340 Wow.
00:51:24.400 Yeah, that
00:51:28.860 dropped a few
00:51:29.460 mics, didn't it?
00:51:31.380 That is really
00:51:32.320 strong, isn't it?
00:51:33.460 Let me just pause
00:51:34.720 here and ask you.
00:51:36.200 In my mind, that
00:51:37.500 sounded like insanely
00:51:38.580 strong.
00:51:40.000 Did you feel it?
00:51:42.180 Did you feel that
00:51:43.200 as persuasive?
00:51:46.660 Not really.
00:51:47.940 Some yes, some no.
00:51:49.920 Now, persuasion, of
00:51:50.920 course, doesn't need
00:51:51.560 to get y'all.
00:51:53.140 Right?
00:51:53.420 It doesn't work
00:51:53.940 that way.
00:51:54.660 You're only trying
00:51:55.420 to pick off the
00:51:56.100 5% that might be
00:51:57.300 persuadable.
00:51:59.420 Women never forget
00:52:00.480 rights taken.
00:52:02.300 Yeah, well, that's
00:52:03.060 certainly the pro-abortion
00:52:06.300 people are going to
00:52:07.460 phrase it as a right
00:52:08.920 taken away.
00:52:10.320 But I think it's too
00:52:11.580 easy to answer that.
00:52:15.060 That it's a right
00:52:16.120 that's driven down
00:52:17.380 to you.
00:52:19.720 I'm giving you more
00:52:20.800 control over your
00:52:21.560 rights.
00:52:21.860 That is what Trump
00:52:26.200 has been saying?
00:52:27.340 Yeah, I don't think
00:52:27.960 he says it as well
00:52:28.620 as I said it.
00:52:31.080 All right.
00:52:33.620 Let me give you an
00:52:34.400 update on global
00:52:35.200 warming.
00:52:37.940 There are two things
00:52:38.920 happening with global
00:52:39.740 warming at the same
00:52:40.540 time.
00:52:40.900 And these are both
00:52:42.040 confirmed.
00:52:43.540 The planet's getting
00:52:44.680 warmer and the planet
00:52:45.860 is cooling off.
00:52:47.920 Confirmed.
00:52:48.440 So there are two
00:52:49.920 things I know for
00:52:50.700 sure is that the
00:52:52.720 planet is getting
00:52:53.480 warmer and also
00:52:54.360 colder at the same
00:52:55.240 time.
00:52:56.120 And I know that
00:52:57.040 because of data.
00:52:58.640 So I've looked into
00:52:59.700 it.
00:52:59.960 I've done a deep
00:53:00.480 dive.
00:53:01.360 I've checked the
00:53:01.980 data.
00:53:02.740 And as of today,
00:53:03.840 the Wall Street
00:53:04.320 Journal, which is not
00:53:06.080 noted for its left
00:53:07.260 leaning politics, the
00:53:09.400 Wall Street Journal is
00:53:10.320 reporting that we
00:53:11.980 reached a new global
00:53:14.300 high in temperature.
00:53:15.640 It's a new high.
00:53:18.780 And things are
00:53:20.500 getting warmer all
00:53:21.200 over the world.
00:53:22.660 If you go to
00:53:23.960 Twitter and just put
00:53:26.260 in climate change,
00:53:27.440 you'll find very
00:53:28.400 credible people telling
00:53:29.600 you exactly the
00:53:30.560 opposite, and they'll
00:53:31.420 show you data.
00:53:32.740 And they'll even show
00:53:33.700 you official data.
00:53:34.600 They'll show you data
00:53:35.260 from the people who
00:53:35.960 claim that climate
00:53:38.640 change is an
00:53:39.580 emergency.
00:53:40.280 They'll use their own
00:53:41.240 data.
00:53:42.020 And they'll say,
00:53:42.880 here it is.
00:53:43.480 It's not true.
00:53:44.280 And then other
00:53:46.100 people will look at,
00:53:47.260 I guess, the same
00:53:48.040 data and say, there
00:53:48.880 it is.
00:53:49.200 It's true.
00:53:50.540 Yeah.
00:53:51.380 So I have no idea.
00:53:54.180 I don't even know how
00:53:55.200 you figure it out.
00:53:57.260 How do you know it's
00:53:58.140 true?
00:54:01.120 I don't know.
00:54:03.260 So I'll just, this is
00:54:05.880 maybe the most dangerous
00:54:06.900 thing for the planet is
00:54:09.580 that we can't tell.
00:54:11.180 Now, I happen to think
00:54:12.400 that no matter how
00:54:13.900 true or not true it
00:54:14.860 is, we're going to do
00:54:15.560 all the same things,
00:54:17.440 meaning that we're
00:54:18.080 going to, you know,
00:54:19.140 the free market still
00:54:21.220 rewards people if they
00:54:22.300 come up with a better
00:54:23.080 form of energy, or
00:54:24.480 even just a good enough
00:54:25.520 form of energy that you
00:54:26.460 could sell a lot of it.
00:54:27.740 So the free market
00:54:28.700 should be doing
00:54:29.400 everything it needs to
00:54:30.360 do to come up with
00:54:31.820 alternative forms of
00:54:33.100 energy, and it seems
00:54:34.540 like it is.
00:54:35.780 So probably we'll be
00:54:37.340 fine, whether it's
00:54:39.760 actually getting warmer
00:54:41.620 like the Wall Street
00:54:43.260 Journal reports today,
00:54:44.480 or it's not, as people
00:54:46.860 all over social media
00:54:47.900 like to tell you.
00:54:49.660 We're going to do the
00:54:50.400 same stuff.
00:54:51.440 Probably doesn't make
00:54:52.300 any difference at all.
00:54:54.140 Because we're so good at
00:54:55.560 remediating against,
00:54:59.240 you know, extremes,
00:55:00.740 everything from extreme
00:55:01.940 heat to extreme
00:55:03.260 everything else, we're
00:55:04.540 really good at it.
00:55:05.220 I think we'll, I think
00:55:07.480 we'll survive.
00:55:09.460 All right, DeSantis
00:55:10.240 campaign made a, I
00:55:13.180 think, a big gaffe.
00:55:15.100 You tell me.
00:55:17.640 So DeSantis tweeted, I
00:55:20.660 guess his campaign tweeted
00:55:23.120 an anti-LGBT, well, what
00:55:28.740 they tried to do, DeSantis
00:55:29.840 tried to make Trump look
00:55:32.700 like he was too
00:55:36.000 pro-LGBTQ, right?
00:55:39.800 DeSantis retweeted a
00:55:42.980 mean political ad
00:55:45.960 that tried to paint
00:55:50.560 Trump as a bad person
00:55:52.300 for being too supportive
00:55:54.400 of LGBTQ.
00:55:56.680 That actually happened
00:55:58.300 in American politics.
00:56:00.880 That really happened.
00:56:02.700 Oh my God.
00:56:05.140 That's such a mistake.
00:56:08.080 You know, Trump has
00:56:11.520 lived in the sort of
00:56:12.880 a Hollywood celebrity
00:56:15.300 world for most of his
00:56:17.040 adult life.
00:56:19.200 If you know anything
00:56:20.600 about the Hollywood,
00:56:22.180 you know, famous rich
00:56:23.800 people life, you know
00:56:25.920 it is just full of
00:56:27.720 LGBTQ people.
00:56:29.180 I would guess that
00:56:32.320 Trump is very
00:56:33.420 comfortable, certainly
00:56:34.580 the way he talks
00:56:35.360 about it, is very
00:56:36.440 comfortable with the
00:56:37.400 LGBT community and
00:56:40.160 is fully supportive of
00:56:43.040 them having a full and
00:56:44.440 free quality life.
00:56:47.060 So going against Trump
00:56:49.520 on this issue is maybe
00:56:51.080 the dumbest thing I've
00:56:52.000 ever seen.
00:56:52.500 Like, I get that there
00:56:55.420 are, you know, some
00:56:56.020 anti-LGBTQ people and
00:56:57.940 maybe they'll say, yeah,
00:56:59.400 DeSantis really goes
00:57:00.980 after him.
00:57:01.820 But if you tell me that
00:57:03.780 you're going to pick the
00:57:04.760 campaign who's going
00:57:05.700 after, going after a
00:57:09.140 segment of Americans?
00:57:10.340 What?
00:57:13.140 That doesn't work for me.
00:57:15.460 No, no.
00:57:17.200 It's one thing to say,
00:57:18.480 you know, progressive
00:57:19.580 politics are crazy.
00:57:21.420 It's one thing to say
00:57:22.400 AOC is crazy or, you
00:57:25.140 know, the politicians.
00:57:26.340 You can call them crazy.
00:57:27.840 That's fine.
00:57:28.820 But you don't go after
00:57:29.860 a segment of the
00:57:34.060 American public.
00:57:36.560 How does that make
00:57:37.600 sense?
00:57:38.380 How do you win an
00:57:39.100 election doing that?
00:57:40.340 That's pure Hillary.
00:57:42.180 That's like Hillary
00:57:42.920 Department.
00:57:44.300 You know, well, we got
00:57:45.140 these deplorables.
00:57:46.860 Wait, what?
00:57:49.000 What?
00:57:50.100 You just called a bunch
00:57:51.420 of law-abiding Americans
00:57:53.420 deplorable?
00:57:54.880 Did they break any laws?
00:57:56.620 Did they violate your
00:57:57.440 constitution?
00:57:59.020 Did they poop on your
00:58:00.000 lawn?
00:58:01.180 No, you don't do that if
00:58:02.540 you're running for
00:58:03.000 president.
00:58:04.080 If you're president,
00:58:05.180 everybody's cool.
00:58:06.680 That's got to be.
00:58:07.840 That's just got to be
00:58:08.640 the base.
00:58:09.860 Everybody's cool.
00:58:11.080 If you're following the
00:58:12.700 law, you know, we have
00:58:13.760 different opinions of
00:58:14.600 what law should be.
00:58:15.840 But everybody who's
00:58:16.720 following the law, you're
00:58:17.480 all cool.
00:58:18.740 Anything beyond that is
00:58:19.900 just fucked up.
00:58:21.140 That's just fucked up.
00:58:22.140 So I think DeSantis probably
00:58:24.080 just destroyed his chances
00:58:25.620 with that.
00:58:27.020 I don't know what chances
00:58:27.820 he had.
00:58:28.700 Now, would it be surprising
00:58:30.560 for you to learn that
00:58:32.520 Ramaswamy is picking up
00:58:34.160 polling steam?
00:58:36.780 So remember, Ramaswamy was
00:58:38.460 polling at like about
00:58:39.600 nothing, close to 2%, I
00:58:41.900 think in the beginning, 2% or
00:58:43.060 3%.
00:58:43.740 And DeSantis was around
00:58:46.280 20%.
00:58:47.100 Well, it depends what
00:58:48.580 poll you're looking at, and
00:58:49.620 I don't see the name of
00:58:50.420 this poll.
00:58:51.180 But allegedly, according to
00:58:54.060 The Hill, DeSantis is down
00:58:57.300 from 20 to 16, and Ramaswamy
00:59:00.240 is up to 10.
00:59:04.440 That's right.
00:59:05.120 So Vivek is, first of all,
00:59:12.780 taking strong positions on
00:59:14.860 stuff like fentanyl, very
00:59:16.940 strong.
00:59:17.500 But the brilliant thing he's
00:59:19.140 doing is he's going into the
00:59:20.640 enemy's cave and walking out
00:59:22.740 with their scalps.
00:59:25.520 He's walking into CNN, and he
00:59:27.860 walks out and he holds up a
00:59:29.580 scalp.
00:59:31.040 And then somebody else invites
00:59:32.300 him in, and he walks out with
00:59:34.340 a scalp.
00:59:36.080 It's really effective.
00:59:39.420 So he's not afraid of the
00:59:41.360 hardest argument.
00:59:42.980 He's going into the darkest
00:59:44.560 caves, and he's walking out
00:59:46.100 with a scalp.
00:59:47.360 He's doing it one time after
00:59:48.660 another.
00:59:49.220 And after a while, you can't
00:59:50.360 ignore it, right?
00:59:51.980 If he does it once, he got
00:59:53.160 lucky.
00:59:54.320 If he keeps doing it, if he
00:59:57.300 keeps doing it, you can't
00:59:58.900 ignore that.
01:00:01.320 And I don't really see him
01:00:04.300 generating what I would call
01:00:05.740 gaffes or, let's say, reasons
01:00:09.100 to not like him.
01:00:10.540 I mean, if you don't like his
01:00:11.580 policies, that's fair game.
01:00:13.580 But he's not giving you a
01:00:14.840 reason to dislike him.
01:00:17.320 And other politicians do.
01:00:18.980 They give you a reason to
01:00:19.980 dislike them.
01:00:21.080 He doesn't do that.
01:00:22.480 He just tells you what he
01:00:23.480 thinks will work.
01:00:24.240 He takes the role of a
01:00:27.760 patriot, the very best kind.
01:00:31.220 So he's impressing the hell
01:00:33.380 out of me.
01:00:34.260 Will he win?
01:00:35.120 We'll see.
01:00:36.160 Anything could happen.
01:00:37.460 He does have a path.
01:00:39.620 His path is to slightly pull
01:00:41.600 ahead of DeSantis, which looks
01:00:43.860 doable, believe it or not.
01:00:45.540 Actually, it looks doable.
01:00:47.100 He's within stretching distance.
01:00:49.340 If he can get into something
01:00:52.600 like a legitimate second place
01:00:54.780 race with DeSantis, and then
01:00:57.160 let's say something happens
01:00:58.520 with Trump.
01:00:59.900 Because when you talk about
01:01:01.200 Trump, something happens is
01:01:03.360 guaranteed.
01:01:04.920 Do you think Trump is going to
01:01:05.900 have no shocks or scandals or
01:01:09.980 be taken out of context again?
01:01:12.480 Of course he will.
01:01:13.980 The press will make up a new
01:01:16.160 story about Trump, and it will
01:01:17.780 be devastating, like all the
01:01:19.680 old stories they made up
01:01:20.800 about him.
01:01:21.720 And Vivek will just be sort
01:01:23.220 of unscathed, because they're
01:01:25.960 not going to put enough
01:01:26.680 attention on him.
01:01:28.360 So he might be just the only
01:01:30.400 unscathed Republican at some
01:01:33.900 point.
01:01:34.800 If that point is the right
01:01:36.300 point, he goes all the way.
01:01:39.720 So he does have a path.
01:01:41.460 I mean, it's narrow.
01:01:42.580 It's very narrow.
01:01:44.020 So it depends entirely upon
01:01:45.900 Trump.
01:01:46.300 So his fate is his own
01:01:49.400 against DeSantis.
01:01:50.980 Yeah, that's the best way to
01:01:52.020 say it.
01:01:52.580 So Vivek can completely
01:01:53.980 control his fate against the
01:01:55.660 other candidates.
01:01:57.360 He has complete control of
01:01:58.840 that.
01:01:59.600 He does not have control over
01:02:01.440 whether he could beat Trump.
01:02:03.440 Trump would have to take
01:02:04.640 himself out, or the Democrats
01:02:06.240 would have to finally succeed.
01:02:08.700 But he's going to be the
01:02:10.640 strongest one who's just
01:02:12.080 sitting there waiting,
01:02:13.780 potentially.
01:02:14.180 Now, DeSantis is going to get
01:02:16.160 a lot of heat from the
01:02:17.060 LGBTQ and other places.
01:02:20.160 And so he might be, he might
01:02:21.740 look a little damaged.
01:02:23.540 And I don't think he could beat
01:02:25.240 Vivek in a debate.
01:02:28.360 Because DeSantis is a pleading
01:02:30.760 voice.
01:02:31.560 I've talked about this.
01:02:33.100 And Vivek is a commanding voice.
01:02:35.160 And I don't mean the quality,
01:02:37.080 the sound of the voice.
01:02:38.740 I mean, the way they present,
01:02:41.240 DeSantis is complaining and
01:02:43.280 then telling you he'll fix it.
01:02:45.400 And Vivek also, you know,
01:02:47.520 calls out the issues.
01:02:49.000 But it's more of a commanding,
01:02:51.060 you know, I'm going to do this,
01:02:52.240 we'll do this kind of thing.
01:02:54.120 So I think Vivek would beat
01:02:57.720 DeSantis in a straight-up
01:02:59.160 debate.
01:03:02.920 But, you know, I've been
01:03:04.540 saying this a lot, but I like to
01:03:06.140 just remind you every now and
01:03:08.360 then, because it's really easy to
01:03:09.520 get down on your country.
01:03:11.220 Real easy.
01:03:13.340 But just think about the fact
01:03:14.800 that we have a Vivek,
01:03:17.620 a DeSantis,
01:03:19.800 you know, RFK Jr.,
01:03:21.100 Trump, you know, Biden, I think,
01:03:24.340 you know, he's passed his
01:03:25.220 expiration date.
01:03:26.600 So it's not about him being a
01:03:28.080 Democrat or not, because, you
01:03:29.220 know, RFK Jr. is a Democrat.
01:03:31.000 But when I see those three
01:03:33.920 characters being, you know,
01:03:35.560 serious contenders for the race,
01:03:37.520 I say, I think we'll be okay.
01:03:40.520 Like, America can still feel
01:03:43.220 that level of talent for the top
01:03:45.940 office.
01:03:46.340 And to me, that's a really high
01:03:48.480 level of talent.
01:03:49.300 You know, whoever wins, you
01:03:51.640 know, if one of those, if one
01:03:52.920 of that group wins,
01:03:55.080 I don't know, I just feel like
01:03:56.460 the country's in good shape,
01:03:57.640 even if you don't like some of
01:03:58.820 the policies.
01:04:01.460 So, DeSantis also decided
01:04:04.220 that Florida will not, or I guess
01:04:09.320 the state decided, but DeSantis is
01:04:11.000 probably behind it, that there are
01:04:13.140 five states that Florida will not
01:04:15.480 accept their driver's license of
01:04:17.320 their state.
01:04:19.300 So, if you came to Florida from
01:04:21.200 Delaware, Connecticut, Hawaii,
01:04:22.640 Rhode Island, or Vermont, you
01:04:24.560 wouldn't be able to rent a car.
01:04:27.300 Do you know why?
01:04:29.320 I believe the reason is that these
01:04:31.420 five states give driver's license to
01:04:33.780 illegal immigrants.
01:04:36.300 And DeSantis is saying, if you're
01:04:38.540 going to give licenses to
01:04:39.780 illegals, and that license allows
01:04:42.120 them to get services, my state
01:04:44.940 doesn't give services to illegals.
01:04:46.720 So, if you're going to certify that
01:04:48.600 these illegals have driver's
01:04:50.920 licenses, we're going to ban your
01:04:53.140 state.
01:04:54.460 You can't have a driver's license in
01:04:56.620 their state.
01:04:57.820 Now, all right, so somebody's saying
01:04:59.920 free money.
01:05:01.180 I get that it's popular.
01:05:03.680 However, that would be a good move as
01:05:07.440 a what?
01:05:10.460 That would be a good move as a
01:05:12.960 governor.
01:05:15.340 Yeah, that's the problem.
01:05:18.000 He just screwed five states and he's
01:05:19.940 running for governor.
01:05:20.640 Let me say it again.
01:05:23.160 In one week, DeSantis insulted the
01:05:25.780 LGBT community and five states.
01:05:29.740 Five states.
01:05:30.720 There's five states that can't have
01:05:36.240 a driver's license or can't legally
01:05:38.520 drive in Florida.
01:05:40.640 Not good.
01:05:41.980 Not good.
01:05:42.720 So, no matter what you think about
01:05:43.960 how smart that is, as a governor, as
01:05:47.300 a presidential candidate, it's just a
01:05:49.060 that's just self-immolating.
01:05:51.640 To me, it's the most ridiculously bad
01:05:53.620 idea I've ever seen.
01:05:54.980 Ever seen in my whole life.
01:05:56.480 No, that's not true.
01:05:57.460 It's not the worst idea I've ever
01:05:58.580 seen.
01:05:58.760 But this is very governor-like.
01:06:02.100 That's the wrong vibe.
01:06:03.680 I don't want a governor vibe from my
01:06:05.760 president.
01:06:09.340 All right.
01:06:10.080 And the thing I said I was going to
01:06:11.500 get back to was my favorite story of
01:06:15.060 the day.
01:06:15.920 A lot of good ones today, but my
01:06:17.420 favorite is there's a Twitter user.
01:06:20.700 I'll call him a user, but he's a
01:06:22.120 political troll called David Leavitt.
01:06:25.520 I think that's pronounced.
01:06:26.660 And he was complaining to Musk and
01:06:29.740 Twitter that somebody had called him
01:06:32.480 the C word.
01:06:34.560 It rhymes with runt, but starts with a C.
01:06:38.680 And he was saying that he couldn't
01:06:41.240 believe that Twitter would allow
01:06:42.760 somebody to stay on the platform after
01:06:45.580 using such an insult.
01:06:46.800 And it took about, oh, about a minute for
01:06:51.820 somebody to produce a November tweet from
01:06:54.460 David Leavitt in which he called somebody
01:06:56.360 a runt.
01:06:58.620 But with a C.
01:07:00.040 But with a C.
01:07:01.320 That's right.
01:07:01.820 So my advice to you is you should always
01:07:09.240 check your past tweets before you take a
01:07:11.960 stand.
01:07:13.700 Don't take a stand if you don't know what
01:07:16.040 you've tweeted in the past.
01:07:18.540 It sounds like a drunk tweet.
01:07:20.160 You're right.
01:07:22.020 But I think my theme for today is everything's
01:07:26.420 moving in the right direction.
01:07:27.500 Further proof that everything's moving in the
01:07:30.760 right direction?
01:07:31.860 On Twitter, you can use the C word.
01:07:35.480 Now, I'm not going to use it here because I
01:07:37.360 only use it in anger.
01:07:40.720 I like to save it.
01:07:42.360 You don't want to use its energy in just
01:07:44.540 talking about it.
01:07:45.560 That would be a waste of it.
01:07:46.760 You want to keep it fresh.
01:07:47.880 Okay, that was a terrible...
01:07:51.540 No, don't...
01:07:53.340 Retreat, retreat, go back.
01:07:55.500 Reverse, reverse, reverse.
01:07:57.280 No, I didn't say that.
01:07:58.320 I didn't say keep it fresh.
01:07:59.920 I'm going to say, you want to keep it
01:08:01.080 powerful.
01:08:01.980 You don't want to drain the energy out of
01:08:03.660 it.
01:08:03.840 You want to keep it powerful.
01:08:05.160 Not fresh.
01:08:06.800 Powerful.
01:08:08.020 Fresh would be good, too.
01:08:09.380 I'm not saying it shouldn't be fresh.
01:08:11.640 Keep it fresh if you can.
01:08:13.320 I'm just saying that my point was about
01:08:15.760 the energy.
01:08:16.220 You want to keep that energy in there
01:08:18.320 in case you need it.
01:08:19.960 So, once again, I'm right about
01:08:22.620 precaution.
01:08:24.620 I'm right about everything.
01:08:27.840 I'm having a good week of being right
01:08:29.580 about everything.
01:08:31.260 Wokeness is disappearing.
01:08:34.580 You may have noticed that I'm slowly
01:08:36.680 being rehabilitated from one of my
01:08:40.840 disgraced cartoonists.
01:08:42.820 You see it in small ways.
01:08:44.260 So, for the Daily Wire to feature my
01:08:47.740 tweet, it would suggest that the Daily
01:08:51.220 Wire is not afraid of me because, you
01:08:54.040 know, they were mentioning it in the
01:08:55.880 same sense as other standard, what they
01:08:59.560 would call right-leaning pundits.
01:09:01.040 How many shows in a row?
01:09:05.420 What?
01:09:09.120 So, everything's going well.
01:09:12.760 And I believe the experts, they got
01:09:17.500 nothing on us.
01:09:19.360 No, they got nothing on us.
01:09:21.640 All right, YouTube.
01:09:22.520 Thanks for joining.
01:09:26.380 Fun day today.
01:09:27.440 I'm sure it'll be fun tomorrow.
01:09:28.740 I love this summer news.
01:09:30.520 Summer news is the best.
01:09:32.380 And I will talk to you tomorrow.
01:09:33.880 Bye-bye.
01:09:44.320 Bye-bye.