A man finds blood on the front of his garage, and he can't figure out what could have caused it. Scott tries to figure out if it's a prank or if it was the work of a hawk.
00:04:59.260At least four women were involved in a wild, caught-on-camera brawl near a set of poker tables at luxury Las Vegas hotel over the weekend.
00:05:09.420One woman was even pulled from a motorized scooter inside Encore at Wynn, Las Vegas,
00:05:15.180as a security guard and a bystander tried to break up the massive fights in the evening.
00:05:20.320The video starts rolling mid-fight with two women, one in jean shorts and the other in a two-piece dress with their thong exposed,
00:05:30.480struggling on the floor as they duke it out.
00:05:32.540A man with a Nike t-shirt rushes in to prevent a woman dressed in cream sweatpants from joining the fracas as he attempts to break up the scrum on the floor of the fancy hotel.
00:05:43.560But as he turns his attention to the two brawling women, the woman in sweats lunges for another woman standing nearby and appears to throw a haymaker.
00:07:24.600But the thing you need to know is that Sam Altman is one of the big, or maybe the biggest investor in this.
00:07:31.760So Sam Altman of AI, of Fusion Investments, he does some big stuff.
00:07:38.440If Sam Altman is not already a household name, it's going to be.
00:07:47.000I mean, if you don't know who he is, you better start paying attention.
00:07:50.120Because he started, maybe, I'm just guessing, he probably started 10 years ago to invest in companies that you wouldn't hear of for 10 years.
00:08:23.040He says the nuclear energy industry can make electricity that is, quote, a way better deal than anything else out there.
00:08:30.120Now, if somebody else said that, nuclear power is more economical than everything out there, you might say to yourself, oh, there's just a, you know, an advocate or, you know, somebody who's in the tank for it or something like that.
00:08:46.300But when Sam Altman says it's a way better deal than anything else out there, here's the thing you can trust.
00:09:49.640I would like to see them have a conversation.
00:09:52.560Because I would like Sam Altman to explain why he thinks his startup will be the most economical energy that could be produced, short of fusion.
00:10:02.860You know, fusion is also one of his investments.
00:13:52.100However, the idea is that the chip-making people are getting together to make their chips just interconnect.
00:13:59.700So somebody makes a video chip, but you make another kind of chip,
00:14:03.180and you just take your chips and you go click, and you just click them together.
00:14:06.760Now, apparently, this is going to be an enormous breakthrough as much because it makes it easy to design things as it does to put them together.
00:19:47.680This is something you didn't see coming.
00:19:49.320But if you port over all the people you follow because of the way they look, your experience on threads is very different from the people on Twitter that I follow because they say brilliant things.
00:20:06.540So on Instagram, I don't know if I follow Mike Cernovich or Jack Posobiec.
00:22:47.980Midnight on Friday, which is where you go to release the news you don't want the public to know.
00:22:53.980Because that doesn't get picked up by the news people because it's late night Friday.
00:22:59.200So on late night Friday, the Biden administration, the White House, announced that it would be not releasing some of the documents about the JFK assassination.
00:23:42.720I believe that the documents would show the government, or maybe just the CIA, but the government in some way was involved in it.
00:23:52.300And the security problem is that we would lose faith in our government or the CIA.
00:23:58.360And that that's considered a security problem because if the public doesn't have a little bit of trust in the government, things fall apart.
00:24:06.840Well, I think it's because they're guilty and they can't tell you.
00:24:12.400Now, I'm not, I would not, I don't think I would necessarily place a life and death bet on being right.
00:25:39.760Because it would damage us when we're trying to stay allied to fight Ukraine or not fight Russia or whoever we're fighting.
00:25:46.820So I would say that, and I say this, I'll say this again, even today, that when the government doesn't tell you all the details, you should assume the worst case about the government.
00:26:02.720But just as you should assume innocence for a citizen until proven guilty, when the government says I'm not going to tell you, you should assume guilt.
00:26:13.060Does everybody believe that that's a reasonable assumption?
00:26:17.080Assume the government is guilty of something horrible if they won't tell you what's going on 60 years after the fact.
00:26:24.520If it was something that happened yesterday, then I would say, oh, this could be legitimate national security.
00:26:35.260I feel like I've waited long enough of the Kennedy assassination.
00:26:39.860At this point, if there's something they're not telling us, I have no assumption other than massive illegal or bad behavior from the government.
00:26:50.140I can't imagine any other possibility.
00:27:14.620It could reveal who really runs the government.
00:27:17.660But would it reveal that 60 years after the fact?
00:27:20.840Because whoever runs the government is probably not the same today, unless you're saying it's an organization that still exists, which, I don't know, maybe.
00:27:41.720Here's the news that's no surprise to anybody.
00:27:44.800The Biden Department of Justice is announcing multiple indictments against the whistleblower who claims he has direct evidence that the Bidens were paid by Chinese entities and other entities for stuff that's sketchy.
00:28:06.960So, let me try to put this in context for you.
00:28:09.460As you know, from the day of Joseph Goebbels, it has been a classic dictator move to accuse your critics of the thing they're accusing you of.
00:28:25.840You should accuse your critics of doing the crime that you actually did.
00:28:30.440Apparently, that's a Goebbels Nazi idea.
00:28:34.000Now, Tucker Carlson, I famously always talk about, because he always used to say this, and I thought it was crazy talk, that the Democrats are accusing the Republicans of whatever crime they're doing.
00:28:45.180To me, that sounded just, I don't know, just too clever, too political, not really something based on actual things happening.
00:28:56.580I have now completely revised my opinion of that.
00:28:59.700It looks like it's, I mean, it looks intentional.
00:29:05.360It's so consistent, it's hard to imagine it's accidental.
00:29:11.680So, the indictments, now remember that the claim from the whistleblower is that the Bidens were working with China in an illegal fashion that involved a transfer of money.
00:37:34.560Let's, you know, hypothetically, let's say that, that they're right, that RFK Jr. is a big old conspiracy theorist, and he's wrong about all these important things, and he just keeps going out there and saying wrong stuff.
00:37:48.600Whose problem, whose job was it to fix that?
00:37:55.000Who has the job to fix wrong information?
00:38:08.280In 2023, if there's a hit piece about you, it's just as much a badge of honor as it is a criticism.
00:38:15.260There is no such thing as a hit piece against a conservative that makes any difference to conservatives, because they don't see it as a hit piece.
00:38:26.160They see it as a sign that somebody is making a dent, somebody is breaking through.
00:44:20.120Because white Americans can't push back as much as they might like to, because they just look like racists.
00:44:26.700But the reason that the Harvard affirmative action thing went the way it did is because the major proponents of ending affirmative action were Asian-Americans.
00:44:37.460And because they were not white Americans, who were widely considered the masters of the universe and therefore deserving of nothing, they could get away.
00:44:49.560I'll say get away with, or let's say succeed.
00:45:11.680But I'm guessing that's the reason that the white residents are somewhat helpless and will just be paying money to black residents of Evanston, in effect, through taxes.
00:45:51.260I guess Jake Tapper was talking to somebody and said that he's not going to shy away from the Hunter laptop or the Biden money scandals.
00:46:03.320But in the same story, I saw how little he talked about it, basically ignored the entire story.
00:46:09.820For most of the time, it was a hot story and it mattered.
00:46:12.160But now that it, you know, now that that time has gone by and Biden got elected and it doesn't matter politically so much, oh, now he's going to talk about it.
00:46:22.600Because I don't think the Democrats are really looking for a Biden second run.
00:46:28.320I doubt that Jake Tapper is thinking to himself, oh, God, things would be so good if Biden got reelected.
00:46:35.420I doubt it, because I just don't think anybody's thinking that.
00:46:42.440But nobody's thinking Biden's the good deal.
00:46:44.520So I think the word is out that even the Democrats can give Biden the shiv at this point, because they're going to try to hasten his removal so they can get somebody in there who might win.
00:46:56.500But I was wondering what it's like to be Jake Tapper.
00:46:58.680So here's this clear, well-documented situation where he, for money, as his profession, he gave you fake news.
00:47:13.280And by fake news, I mean he ignored the real news that would have changed how you thought about a lot of things.
00:47:20.540Ignoring real news if your job is to report the news.
00:47:23.920So how can you be, how embarrassing is it to present yourself as a news professional when the news itself, the news itself, has clearly defined you as a purveyor of fake news, a misinformation purveyor, by omission as much as inclusion.
00:48:29.540If Jake Tapper had aggressively reported on the laptop from the first moment, as well as, you know, allegations from whistleblowers and everything,
00:48:38.000do you think, do you think, do you think Biden would have been elected?
00:48:42.860Just ask yourself, would Biden have been elected if just one thing had changed?
00:48:47.220Just one person, Jake Tapper doing his actual job instead of doing something that looks political from the outside, ignoring the laptop story.
00:48:56.760If the only thing he'd done is his job, is it possible that the war in Ukraine would not have happened?
00:49:06.460The war in Ukraine is because Biden's president, right?
00:49:11.740Would Biden be president if Jake Tapper, just that one person, had aggressively reported on the laptop and all it implied about the Biden crime family?
00:49:21.900Jake Tapper may have killed hundreds of thousands of people by not doing his job right.
00:49:42.460Jake Tapper doesn't do his job and he ignores the laptop story, which would have said a lot about the possibility of the Biden crime family corruption thing.
00:49:52.420If that had been enough, let's say if he had been aggressive about it, if that had been enough to change the narrative, and I think it would have, because CNN reports that everybody on the left gets to see it.
00:50:06.480So if he had done that, you'd probably have a President Trump, or at least there's a better chance.
00:59:46.280You know, I have this theory that when you reach a certain level of intelligence, everybody at that level of intelligence has the same opinion.
00:59:55.240Now, I'm sure it's not literally true.
01:00:03.820Like, at some level of intelligence, people have the same information and the same ability to process that information.
01:00:11.300Usually, most disagreements are disagreements in information.
01:00:15.700Or, disagreements, or let's say, different abilities to reason.
01:00:20.200Now, some people are just taking a team perspective.
01:00:25.400But, if you look at Dr. Jordan Peterson or Elon Musk, those are two people that I respect immensely for their intelligence, specifically.
01:00:35.500But, I would also say that these are two people who would easily, easily be able to go against their team.
01:00:43.220Would you agree with both those statements?
01:00:44.740They're both immensely intelligent, and both of them have shown that they could, it would just depend on the topic, they could go against the people that, you know, you imagine are on their side, easily.
01:00:57.960And, they could do it without any hiccup.
01:01:00.220Like, no, there would be no friction there at all.
01:01:03.560I believe that they could go against their biggest supporters in a heartbeat without even hesitation.
01:01:09.740So, that makes them two of the most valuable people in the country, even though Jordan Peterson's Canadian.
01:01:16.740But, in terms of the value of the United States, you give somebody who's that smart, who can also change their mind, that's just gold.
01:01:27.600Like, that's what makes your country work.
01:01:34.160He recently tweeted that he made a mistake, in his words, a mistake, thinking that DeSantis was going to, you know, rise and win the primary.
01:01:45.540Now, when you see somebody like Mike Cervich easily and effortlessly say, oh, this thing I said was very, very, I was very sure about was 100% wrong, and now let's go on.
01:02:00.100Like, that's such a credibility builder, because nobody's right about predictions, right?
01:02:07.680Like, you know, you could be the best predictor in the world, which happens to be me, and I still get plenty wrong, right?
01:02:15.040So, being wrong is nothing, you know, no kind of shock.
01:02:20.860So, here's where Jordan Peterson and Elon Musk disagree, which I find fascinating, and it's, Elon Musk said something about he would protect anonymous users on Twitter, and that if you wanted to be anonymous on Twitter, as long as you're following the guidelines, Elon Musk says, absolutely, you can be anonymous on Twitter.
01:02:43.240Dr. Jordan Peterson says, in a tweet to Elon Musk, he says, anonymity enables the dark tetrad types, I'll explain that, Elon Musk, and unopposed, they will take us all down.
01:03:02.600It's a big mistake, sir, with all due respect.
01:03:05.300Now, I do love to see the respect that, you know, he pays to Musk, because he knows Musk isn't doing stupid shit, right?
01:03:14.140So, that is worthy of respect, even if you disagree a lot.
01:03:18.420You know he thought it through, right?