Real Coffee with Scott Adams - July 17, 2023


Episode 2172 Scott Adams: The News Is Fake But You Can Listen To It While Sipping Real Coffee


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 9 minutes

Words per minute

143.70425

Word count

9,928

Sentence count

718

Harmful content

Misogyny

12

sentences flagged

Toxicity

80

sentences flagged

Hate speech

22

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode of Coffee with Scott Adams, I talk about a new AI app I'm working on, and why I don't think it's going to be a hit. I also talk about why I think the first week of the Threads launch was a disaster for them, and how they managed to bounce back.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Da-da-da! 0.99
00:00:02.400 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.
00:00:08.020 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and there's never been a finer time in your life.
00:00:13.180 Would you like to take that experience up to levels that nobody's ever seen before?
00:00:18.420 Sure you do.
00:00:19.120 All you do is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tankard, shells, or a stein, a canteen, jug,
00:00:22.820 or flask, or a vessel of any kind.
00:00:25.540 Fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:00:27.280 I like coffee.
00:00:28.060 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine of the day,
00:00:32.600 the thing that makes everything better.
00:00:34.340 It's called the Simultaneous Sip.
00:00:37.580 And it happens now.
00:00:39.120 Go.
00:00:44.100 Now your life is complete.
00:00:49.100 Yeah.
00:00:50.140 You know, if you'd like to be called one in a million,
00:00:54.260 has anybody ever said that about you?
00:00:55.740 You know, you're one in a million.
00:00:59.420 Well, you could be one in a million if you follow me on Twitter,
00:01:02.680 because now I have a million followers.
00:01:05.100 You could be one.
00:01:06.940 One in a million.
00:01:09.120 Sounds better than it is.
00:01:11.540 All right.
00:01:12.140 I've got an idea for an app.
00:01:16.600 But first, I'll tell you that there's a Twitter user called Moritz Krem,
00:01:21.520 who follows AI,
00:01:23.180 and he gave a handy list of which AI models to use for what things.
00:01:28.280 So for Internet tasks, he thinks BARD would be good.
00:01:32.980 BARD.
00:01:34.020 For writing tasks, GPT-4.
00:01:36.600 For coding, code interpreter.
00:01:38.260 For analyzing long PDFs,
00:01:40.700 CLAWD-2, harder reasoning tasks, GPT-4, data analysis, code interpreter, etc.
00:01:46.560 And I said to myself, you know what we really need?
00:01:52.440 We need some kind of app that will tell you what the other apps do,
00:01:57.720 because they're all changing all the time.
00:02:00.820 And let's call it a concierge app.
00:02:05.900 Concierge app.
00:02:06.660 You should have one app that you can say,
00:02:11.020 hey, do something for me.
00:02:13.320 And then that app, like a concierge,
00:02:15.940 would, behind the scenes,
00:02:17.900 go use whichever AI app is the right one.
00:02:21.460 In other words,
00:02:22.980 the app I would like to control all the AIs,
00:02:26.360 it's AI.
00:02:27.800 It's AI.
00:02:28.800 I mean, it would have to have AI as well, probably.
00:02:31.660 So give me a concierge app
00:02:33.620 that has an API connection to all the other apps
00:02:37.360 and set me free.
00:02:40.100 I feel as if Google will have to be that.
00:02:43.960 I feel as if somebody's going to have to consolidate the other apps,
00:02:47.480 because I don't think they're just going to open their APIs.
00:02:50.040 Do you?
00:02:51.020 Do you think everybody's just going to be able to use it?
00:02:54.720 Yeah.
00:02:55.560 Concierge app.
00:02:56.260 That's what I need.
00:02:57.760 Well, there's an update on Threads,
00:02:59.840 that's the meta Facebook competitor to Twitter.
00:03:05.640 Now, of course,
00:03:06.460 they got lots of flashy attention during the launch,
00:03:10.180 because you could bring over your Instagram follows,
00:03:13.460 and that would give you a big head start.
00:03:15.360 But it turns out that it's not doing so well
00:03:19.240 after the first week.
00:03:21.920 Now, daily,
00:03:22.720 I saw this in a tweet by Mario Naufal,
00:03:27.980 that daily active users dropped off pretty hard,
00:03:32.200 38% lower than the first week.
00:03:36.240 Time spent per user went from 20 minutes to five.
00:03:41.020 This was a 75% reduction in four days.
00:03:44.340 During the same period,
00:03:45.300 Twitter remained virtually unchanged.
00:03:47.620 And Instagram took a little bit of a hit,
00:03:52.620 just a little bit.
00:03:54.780 So,
00:03:56.220 this is not looking so good.
00:03:59.360 However,
00:04:00.180 if I could make just one contextual point,
00:04:05.680 we expected,
00:04:07.940 or a lot of people expected,
00:04:09.460 the threads would at least start off with a big solid base
00:04:12.500 and maybe grow from there.
00:04:14.120 But if you think about it,
00:04:15.560 the design of their system guaranteed
00:04:18.960 that it would fall off right away.
00:04:21.520 Am I wrong?
00:04:23.020 By design,
00:04:24.720 it should have fallen off the next week,
00:04:27.300 just like it did.
00:04:28.460 And the reason is,
00:04:29.380 it never started small and grew.
00:04:32.700 It started big,
00:04:34.460 and then people looked at it,
00:04:35.700 and some of them said,
00:04:36.540 eh, not for me.
00:04:38.340 So if you start huge,
00:04:40.140 because you could easily port over your Instagram people,
00:04:43.560 then you're just asking for a drop the next week.
00:04:49.220 Because the people they brought off
00:04:50.700 were not really solid users
00:04:52.280 who were going to stick around.
00:04:54.000 They were just casual tourists.
00:04:56.560 So if you bring over 100 million casual tourists
00:04:59.480 to your product,
00:05:01.920 well,
00:05:02.100 what should you logically expect the next week
00:05:04.320 is going to look like?
00:05:05.700 It's going to look like
00:05:06.800 they were casual tourists
00:05:08.600 and they didn't need to stick around.
00:05:09.900 So I think the Threads trajectory so far
00:05:14.920 is exactly what you should expect.
00:05:18.980 Now,
00:05:19.600 if it's going to succeed,
00:05:21.340 which seems like a pretty big if at this point,
00:05:24.300 what you would expect
00:05:25.500 is that they would have this big launch,
00:05:27.180 it would get a lot of attention,
00:05:28.840 people would say,
00:05:29.940 there's not,
00:05:30.400 my friends aren't here,
00:05:31.620 and then they would go away.
00:05:32.860 But if Threads is going to work,
00:05:36.800 it will have,
00:05:37.640 you know,
00:05:37.920 by now created some base of people
00:05:39.960 who want to be there.
00:05:42.300 And if they want to stay there,
00:05:43.880 then,
00:05:44.280 you know,
00:05:44.480 it could grow from there.
00:05:45.600 But it pretty much had to,
00:05:47.060 the way they launched,
00:05:49.020 largely guaranteed
00:05:50.200 that it would tank the next week.
00:05:52.700 Would you agree with that analysis?
00:05:54.720 That the tanking
00:05:55.860 was baked into the way they designed it.
00:05:59.880 There was no way around it.
00:06:01.060 I mean,
00:06:02.600 I guess they could be optimistic
00:06:03.840 and say,
00:06:04.920 maybe all these people
00:06:06.060 who used Instagram
00:06:06.880 will love our new thing
00:06:08.820 that always existed
00:06:09.840 and they weren't using it.
00:06:11.940 Right?
00:06:12.760 If you were on Instagram
00:06:13.860 and not using Twitter,
00:06:16.180 how much interest
00:06:17.360 did you have in a Twitter clone?
00:06:20.500 If you weren't already satisfied
00:06:22.520 with all your,
00:06:23.420 you know,
00:06:23.940 your small message tweeting needs,
00:06:26.480 you probably never needed them
00:06:28.880 in the first place.
00:06:29.620 And I said this before
00:06:32.080 I brought over
00:06:33.380 all of my Instagram followers,
00:06:35.900 only to learn
00:06:37.020 that 90% of the people
00:06:38.740 I follow on Instagram
00:06:39.720 can't talk.
00:06:41.600 They can't talk.
00:06:43.700 Man,
00:06:43.920 they can take a great picture.
00:06:45.900 They can take a picture
00:06:47.000 like nobody's business.
00:06:48.860 But then they try to do
00:06:50.140 a thread
00:06:50.980 or, you know,
00:06:51.600 like a little message
00:06:52.460 and they use
00:06:53.700 their language skills.
00:06:55.840 It's not so good.
00:06:57.220 It's not so good.
00:06:58.220 Now,
00:06:59.500 mostly the Instagram people
00:07:00.740 are trying to not offend you.
00:07:03.040 Do you know what happens
00:07:03.860 when they write text
00:07:05.000 that doesn't offend you?
00:07:07.380 You don't want to read it.
00:07:10.740 Right?
00:07:11.420 The world is full of text
00:07:12.840 that doesn't offend me.
00:07:13.960 Why would I be attracted to it?
00:07:15.960 I need a little edge.
00:07:17.800 I need to be offended
00:07:18.840 a little bit.
00:07:19.760 Somebody pointed out
00:07:20.700 that Zuckerberg
00:07:22.540 is only posted once
00:07:23.840 on threads
00:07:24.680 in a week
00:07:25.360 and it was a picture
00:07:26.540 of a lake.
00:07:29.780 Now,
00:07:30.000 compare
00:07:30.360 Elon Musk
00:07:32.100 toilet tweeting
00:07:33.920 on Twitter
00:07:34.840 some of the funniest
00:07:36.740 tweets you've ever seen
00:07:37.740 in your life
00:07:38.240 or at the very least
00:07:39.260 they're provocative.
00:07:40.920 Right?
00:07:41.580 And the best Zuckerberg
00:07:43.680 could do
00:07:44.100 is one picture
00:07:44.740 of a lake
00:07:45.340 in a week.
00:07:47.860 So,
00:07:48.820 that tells you
00:07:49.420 how excited he is.
00:07:50.160 But,
00:07:51.160 in his defense,
00:07:53.280 Zuckerberg
00:07:54.200 is probably
00:07:54.840 spending all of his time
00:07:55.980 in the
00:07:56.620 virtual reality world.
00:08:01.040 No,
00:08:01.600 he's not doing that either.
00:08:03.200 Do you know
00:08:03.500 why he's not spending
00:08:04.240 all of his time
00:08:04.820 in the virtual reality world
00:08:06.360 of Meta?
00:08:08.740 Same reason
00:08:09.700 you're not.
00:08:12.520 Nobody wants
00:08:13.300 to be there.
00:08:15.860 Just nobody
00:08:16.700 wants to be there.
00:08:17.640 I have
00:08:20.000 zero interest.
00:08:22.020 Does anybody
00:08:22.480 have interest
00:08:23.080 in the virtual world?
00:08:27.800 Here's how
00:08:28.440 uninterested
00:08:29.120 I am
00:08:29.640 in the virtual world.
00:08:31.300 I hate
00:08:32.080 to sleep.
00:08:34.240 I don't even
00:08:35.100 like to be asleep
00:08:36.160 because when I'm
00:08:38.020 asleep
00:08:38.360 I go to the
00:08:38.920 virtual world.
00:08:40.360 You know,
00:08:40.540 the dream world
00:08:41.320 that doesn't
00:08:42.280 really count.
00:08:43.360 And when I wake
00:08:44.040 up,
00:08:45.160 when I wake
00:08:45.840 up,
00:08:46.180 100%
00:08:46.900 of all the
00:08:47.360 stuff I did
00:08:47.940 in my
00:08:48.280 virtual world
00:08:49.140 isn't worth
00:08:51.180 piss
00:08:51.680 because it
00:08:53.100 wasn't real.
00:08:54.520 It was just
00:08:55.000 a bunch of 1.00
00:08:55.700 shit that 0.99
00:08:56.320 happened in my 1.00
00:08:56.900 brain while I
00:08:57.520 was trying to
00:08:57.940 rest.
00:08:59.200 So that's what
00:08:59.960 the virtual reality
00:09:01.360 feels like.
00:09:02.260 It feels like
00:09:02.920 leaving the real
00:09:03.760 world for
00:09:05.520 something that
00:09:06.100 can never be
00:09:06.700 important and
00:09:07.320 never can be
00:09:07.860 real.
00:09:09.100 I'm just not
00:09:09.900 drawn to it at
00:09:10.620 all.
00:09:11.520 I have to admit
00:09:12.620 there was a point
00:09:13.300 where I was
00:09:13.920 drawn to it,
00:09:15.220 at least mentally.
00:09:16.100 Well,
00:09:17.040 actually enough
00:09:17.580 to actually
00:09:17.980 buy a system.
00:09:19.780 I actually had
00:09:20.360 a virtual reality
00:09:21.160 system until
00:09:22.880 recently.
00:09:23.960 And I
00:09:26.640 thought it
00:09:26.980 was a lot
00:09:27.480 of fun.
00:09:28.740 And then after
00:09:29.640 I'd played a few
00:09:30.460 things that were
00:09:31.000 fun and they
00:09:31.600 gave me a
00:09:32.040 headache and I
00:09:33.560 realized that the
00:09:34.220 entire time that I
00:09:35.040 was doing this
00:09:35.640 thing, I wasn't
00:09:37.120 part of the real
00:09:37.800 world.
00:09:38.820 And then I
00:09:39.220 said, I don't
00:09:40.520 really like that.
00:09:41.440 I'd rather be in
00:09:42.100 the real world.
00:09:43.440 I've got stuff to
00:09:44.180 do.
00:09:45.260 So I don't
00:09:46.020 think the
00:09:46.660 virtual reality
00:09:47.480 thing is going
00:09:48.520 to work.
00:09:49.880 Honestly, that's
00:09:50.800 my current
00:09:51.260 opinion.
00:09:51.740 I would have
00:09:52.060 said it would
00:09:52.440 work a while
00:09:53.660 ago, but it
00:09:54.300 looks like it
00:09:54.920 won't.
00:09:56.020 Now, I could be
00:09:56.820 wrong because there
00:09:57.740 could be some
00:09:58.320 point where if you
00:09:59.740 add AI into the
00:10:00.860 virtual world, you
00:10:02.520 can just go into
00:10:03.220 this world full of
00:10:04.380 magical characters
00:10:05.740 who talk to you.
00:10:06.800 You might even
00:10:07.280 have friends.
00:10:08.600 You might have
00:10:09.060 like a friend in
00:10:09.920 the virtual world
00:10:10.700 who's an AI
00:10:11.260 character who just
00:10:12.040 remembers you.
00:10:12.680 So I could see
00:10:14.520 a certain number
00:10:15.420 of shut-ins and
00:10:16.420 people in
00:10:17.400 wheelchairs and
00:10:18.220 stuff like that
00:10:18.800 might use it and
00:10:19.740 love it.
00:10:20.540 I just don't
00:10:21.200 think that healthy
00:10:22.160 people who have
00:10:23.960 full lives in the
00:10:25.060 real world are
00:10:26.540 going to want to
00:10:26.860 spend too much
00:10:27.700 time in it.
00:10:28.860 Now, I would
00:10:30.340 have said that
00:10:30.800 about gaming as
00:10:31.820 well, and I
00:10:32.840 would have been
00:10:33.200 totally wrong
00:10:33.800 about that.
00:10:34.840 However, what
00:10:37.900 percentage of
00:10:38.460 people are
00:10:39.260 regular gamers,
00:10:40.500 do you think,
00:10:40.900 of the general
00:10:43.320 public?
00:10:44.440 What percent
00:10:45.200 actually sit
00:10:45.960 down and, you
00:10:47.240 know, on a
00:10:47.660 regular basis
00:10:48.420 they gain?
00:10:50.380 You say 25%.
00:10:52.060 25%.
00:10:53.300 If I had to
00:10:54.680 guess, I think
00:10:55.200 it's in the
00:10:55.940 10 to 15%.
00:10:58.820 Somewhere 10%,
00:11:01.360 15, something
00:11:03.140 like that.
00:11:03.760 Yeah, I think
00:11:04.180 that's the upside
00:11:05.000 for virtual reality
00:11:06.360 as well.
00:11:07.360 Somewhere in that
00:11:08.120 category.
00:11:08.680 All right.
00:11:11.060 However, Threads,
00:11:12.860 despite its
00:11:13.720 traffic, has
00:11:15.720 pulled off one
00:11:16.500 of the greatest
00:11:17.020 successes, I
00:11:19.500 don't know, in
00:11:19.900 modern technical
00:11:21.240 world.
00:11:22.520 And I'm impressed.
00:11:24.080 So what Threads
00:11:24.880 did was it got
00:11:25.820 Ron Perlman to
00:11:26.980 leave Twitter.
00:11:29.820 So that's one of
00:11:31.400 the biggest
00:11:31.800 accomplishments of
00:11:32.620 the year, and
00:11:33.320 I'm very grateful
00:11:34.760 to Zuckerberg for
00:11:36.120 creating a product
00:11:37.160 whose only purpose
00:11:38.640 was to remove Ron
00:11:39.860 Perlman from
00:11:40.560 Twitter, and it
00:11:41.680 did it very well.
00:11:42.900 It did it very
00:11:43.480 well.
00:11:44.800 He'll probably be
00:11:45.420 back.
00:11:49.720 I saw a tweet
00:11:50.800 from a user
00:11:51.720 named Drain
00:11:52.780 Bamage, who
00:11:55.680 described Threads
00:11:57.620 after I noted
00:11:58.460 that Ron Perlman
00:11:59.300 left to be on
00:11:59.920 Threads.
00:12:00.860 He described
00:12:01.780 Threads as the
00:12:02.580 island of misfit
00:12:03.580 tweeters.
00:12:04.140 Threads as the
00:12:07.340 island of misfit
00:12:08.540 tweeters.
00:12:14.620 When you think of
00:12:15.560 Ron Perlman, don't
00:12:17.040 you just think of 0.94
00:12:17.880 mental problems? 0.70
00:12:22.720 Somebody told him
00:12:23.740 that holding the
00:12:24.800 camera right up to
00:12:25.680 his face when he
00:12:26.760 does his videos was
00:12:29.620 a good idea.
00:12:30.520 I think I'm going
00:12:30.980 to hold it right
00:12:31.500 up here.
00:12:31.860 And then I'm
00:12:32.740 going to growl 0.99
00:12:34.140 with my ugly 1.00
00:12:34.760 face. 1.00
00:12:39.060 Take that shit 1.00
00:12:41.720 to Threads, 1.00
00:12:42.420 will you?
00:12:43.560 Get out of my
00:12:44.700 face with that. 0.98
00:12:45.940 Go to the 0.62
00:12:46.320 island of misfit
00:12:47.180 tweeters.
00:12:48.620 All right,
00:12:48.840 Wall Street Journal
00:12:49.440 says, good news,
00:12:50.760 paychecks and pay
00:12:52.820 is going up higher
00:12:54.260 than inflation.
00:12:58.160 Paychecks are
00:12:58.780 being raised higher
00:12:59.660 than inflation.
00:13:00.360 Paychecks are
00:13:05.080 going up higher
00:13:05.760 than inflation.
00:13:08.280 What is it that
00:13:09.160 causes inflation?
00:13:11.120 Well, a number of
00:13:11.780 things, the amount
00:13:12.800 of money you print,
00:13:13.680 of course.
00:13:14.840 But isn't one of
00:13:15.740 the things that
00:13:16.260 causes inflation
00:13:17.280 rising wages?
00:13:20.700 Am I wrong
00:13:21.460 about that?
00:13:23.060 Aren't rising
00:13:23.960 wages
00:13:25.600 inflation?
00:13:27.060 inflation?
00:13:27.940 So the good
00:13:29.180 news is that
00:13:30.020 the inflation
00:13:31.280 isn't going up,
00:13:32.960 just all the
00:13:33.700 salaries of the
00:13:34.340 people.
00:13:35.520 And I don't see
00:13:36.200 how that could be
00:13:37.040 any problem down
00:13:37.840 the road.
00:13:40.500 It's like none
00:13:41.320 of the news is
00:13:42.220 clean.
00:13:43.160 It's all, hey,
00:13:44.040 good news!
00:13:45.000 Yeah, it's all
00:13:47.440 like that.
00:13:47.920 It's really good
00:13:48.600 news!
00:13:52.540 Nothing's a
00:13:53.100 clean win
00:13:53.580 anymore.
00:13:56.020 Well, there
00:13:56.660 was on the
00:13:57.620 internet, I saw
00:13:58.160 there was a
00:13:59.080 whiteness
00:13:59.760 studies professor
00:14:00.920 who said that
00:14:03.260 white people
00:14:04.700 who treat all
00:14:05.420 races equally
00:14:06.200 are dangerous.
00:14:08.080 I saw this
00:14:08.580 on a tweet
00:14:09.060 by Amuse
00:14:10.200 on Twitter.
00:14:12.740 That's right,
00:14:13.200 whiteness
00:14:13.620 studies professor
00:14:14.620 says white
00:14:15.300 people who
00:14:15.760 treat all
00:14:16.160 races equally
00:14:16.860 are dangerous.
00:14:18.860 And here
00:14:19.540 she is.
00:14:21.220 Here she is.
00:14:21.860 Now, I had
00:14:23.420 to weigh in
00:14:23.940 and say that
00:14:24.580 I don't judge
00:14:25.380 people by race.
00:14:27.160 I don't think
00:14:27.800 that's right.
00:14:28.900 I judge them
00:14:29.520 by their
00:14:29.820 haircuts.
00:14:30.780 Their haircuts.
00:14:32.480 I'm going to
00:14:33.140 be a little bit
00:14:33.660 harsh on this 0.94
00:14:34.520 white studies
00:14:35.860 professor.
00:14:39.200 Haircut.
00:14:40.200 It's not on
00:14:41.200 point.
00:14:42.300 It's just not
00:14:42.940 on point.
00:14:44.200 In fact, if you
00:14:44.920 see a professor
00:14:47.160 with his haircut,
00:14:48.620 I wouldn't take
00:14:49.760 the class.
00:14:51.100 I really
00:14:51.460 wouldn't.
00:14:52.000 I'd like to
00:14:52.640 sign up for
00:14:53.120 almost anything
00:14:53.960 else.
00:14:55.300 I'd take
00:14:55.700 statistics before
00:14:57.360 I'd take a
00:14:58.680 class with a
00:14:59.220 haircut.
00:15:00.240 I'm just
00:15:00.980 saying, think
00:15:02.980 about the
00:15:03.980 whole picture,
00:15:04.960 the big
00:15:05.340 picture.
00:15:07.000 Well, as
00:15:08.200 you know, I
00:15:08.960 have announced
00:15:09.620 that I'm no
00:15:11.420 longer going to
00:15:12.120 care about
00:15:12.860 racial groups
00:15:14.720 or any
00:15:15.780 kind of
00:15:16.040 group.
00:15:17.800 Don't care.
00:15:20.360 So I'm going
00:15:21.400 to see if I'm
00:15:21.900 going to make
00:15:22.140 this stick.
00:15:23.140 It would be
00:15:23.580 my greatest
00:15:24.700 achievement.
00:15:27.440 So you know
00:15:28.120 what I realized
00:15:28.660 today?
00:15:29.300 You know,
00:15:29.540 Dr.
00:15:30.300 King's,
00:15:32.440 let's say,
00:15:33.280 his advice to
00:15:34.500 society was
00:15:36.280 to judge people
00:15:37.160 by the content
00:15:37.900 of their
00:15:38.360 character and
00:15:39.860 not by their
00:15:40.460 race.
00:15:42.080 Now, that
00:15:42.440 sounded pretty
00:15:43.100 good, didn't
00:15:43.620 it?
00:15:44.160 Judge people
00:15:44.820 by the content
00:15:45.640 of their
00:15:46.120 character.
00:15:47.640 Well, it
00:15:48.140 turns out if
00:15:48.760 you do that,
00:15:49.780 you don't get
00:15:50.400 a good outcome.
00:15:53.660 So,
00:15:55.340 turns out that
00:15:57.680 didn't work at
00:15:58.320 all.
00:15:59.160 It didn't work
00:15:59.800 at all.
00:16:00.700 Now, the
00:16:01.240 reason we're
00:16:01.860 moving away
00:16:02.820 from it, and
00:16:03.600 when I say we,
00:16:04.260 I mean, the
00:16:05.040 political left,
00:16:06.260 the reason they're
00:16:07.000 moving away
00:16:07.860 from looking at
00:16:10.240 the content of
00:16:11.000 people's character,
00:16:12.040 which would
00:16:12.740 include their
00:16:13.500 achievement and
00:16:14.680 what they've done
00:16:15.500 to prepare
00:16:16.060 themselves for a
00:16:17.080 good life,
00:16:18.520 it just didn't
00:16:19.140 work.
00:16:19.900 It didn't work
00:16:20.360 at all.
00:16:21.200 So instead,
00:16:21.740 they have to
00:16:22.120 use other
00:16:23.820 things like race
00:16:24.700 and gender and
00:16:25.740 sexual preference
00:16:26.620 and stuff like
00:16:27.380 that.
00:16:31.060 So, we've
00:16:32.720 got this
00:16:33.100 situation where
00:16:34.160 we've
00:16:35.500 completely
00:16:35.940 abandoned the
00:16:36.680 content of
00:16:37.340 the character
00:16:37.860 as a,
00:16:39.500 really as a
00:16:41.220 variable, which
00:16:41.920 is not even a
00:16:42.580 variable anymore.
00:16:43.560 It's more about
00:16:44.260 what you look
00:16:44.860 like.
00:16:46.240 Now, how many
00:16:47.160 of you are
00:16:47.740 buying into
00:16:48.260 that system,
00:16:49.900 the system
00:16:50.360 where we talk
00:16:51.080 about people
00:16:51.660 by their
00:16:52.300 category?
00:16:54.700 See, part of
00:16:55.400 the problem is
00:16:55.900 that we allow
00:16:56.460 ourselves to
00:16:57.380 enter the
00:16:58.440 frame.
00:17:00.380 Because if
00:17:01.020 one side says,
00:17:01.840 hey, we're
00:17:02.260 going to do
00:17:02.500 this thing with
00:17:03.060 racial,
00:17:03.580 preferences or
00:17:05.420 racial
00:17:05.920 consideration,
00:17:07.340 how do you
00:17:08.340 talk about it
00:17:09.100 without entering
00:17:10.000 the frame?
00:17:11.760 See the
00:17:12.120 problem?
00:17:13.400 If somebody
00:17:13.940 says, I'm
00:17:14.740 going to do
00:17:15.200 this thing,
00:17:15.700 it has a
00:17:16.060 racial quality
00:17:18.100 to it, you
00:17:19.300 can't even have
00:17:19.940 the conversation
00:17:20.720 without first
00:17:22.260 entering their
00:17:22.860 frame that
00:17:23.760 you're on one
00:17:24.380 side and
00:17:24.960 there's somebody
00:17:25.360 on the other
00:17:25.760 side.
00:17:27.360 Why must I
00:17:28.340 do that?
00:17:28.860 I reject that
00:17:29.540 now.
00:17:29.780 I reject
00:17:30.860 that I'm
00:17:31.240 even going
00:17:31.600 to be in
00:17:31.840 that
00:17:32.020 conversation.
00:17:33.660 So here's
00:17:34.100 my new,
00:17:35.620 and I
00:17:36.080 haven't really
00:17:36.540 modeled this
00:17:37.420 yet, so I
00:17:38.000 don't know if
00:17:38.320 this is going
00:17:38.640 to work yet.
00:17:39.080 I'm going to
00:17:39.300 try it.
00:17:40.260 From now on,
00:17:41.160 if the
00:17:41.420 conversation is
00:17:42.240 blah, blah,
00:17:42.780 blah, something
00:17:43.300 about race,
00:17:44.340 I just take a
00:17:44.980 pass.
00:17:46.500 Okay.
00:17:47.340 I'm not really
00:17:48.140 in the world
00:17:48.800 where I judge
00:17:49.600 people by their
00:17:50.300 race.
00:17:51.340 So this is a
00:17:52.200 conversation for
00:17:52.900 you to have
00:17:53.320 with yourself.
00:17:54.000 If you'd
00:17:55.700 like me to
00:17:56.140 be involved
00:17:56.640 in your
00:17:56.980 conversation,
00:17:58.280 I'd be happy
00:17:59.020 to talk about
00:17:59.580 individuals.
00:18:00.980 If there are
00:18:01.360 any individuals
00:18:02.340 who feel like
00:18:03.060 they're being
00:18:03.380 held back,
00:18:04.660 I could give
00:18:05.200 them some
00:18:05.620 advice.
00:18:07.560 How to
00:18:08.180 not be
00:18:08.580 held back.
00:18:09.460 You know,
00:18:09.640 develop your
00:18:10.160 talent stack
00:18:11.000 and stay
00:18:11.980 out of
00:18:12.220 trouble.
00:18:12.880 You know,
00:18:13.140 easy stuff.
00:18:14.740 So from
00:18:15.620 now on,
00:18:16.080 it's just
00:18:16.440 individuals.
00:18:18.340 So 100%
00:18:19.520 of all the
00:18:20.220 stories and
00:18:20.900 things about
00:18:21.580 a group is
00:18:22.280 a group and
00:18:22.860 this group is
00:18:23.560 bad and
00:18:23.980 this group
00:18:24.480 to this
00:18:24.920 group.
00:18:25.560 I don't
00:18:25.780 care.
00:18:27.020 I just
00:18:27.860 don't even
00:18:28.220 care what
00:18:28.560 group you're
00:18:29.000 in.
00:18:29.720 I'm just
00:18:30.240 not going
00:18:30.540 to be
00:18:30.700 part of
00:18:30.940 that
00:18:31.160 conversation.
00:18:32.540 But I'm
00:18:33.240 going to
00:18:33.440 cover it
00:18:33.860 in the
00:18:34.120 news just
00:18:35.080 to show
00:18:35.480 you all 1.00
00:18:35.820 the idiots 1.00
00:18:36.360 who are. 1.00
00:18:38.000 Fair enough?
00:18:38.840 We're just
00:18:39.340 going to mock
00:18:39.840 them for
00:18:41.060 being race 0.79
00:18:42.100 obsessed.
00:18:43.360 I'm not
00:18:43.780 going to say
00:18:44.300 they're right
00:18:44.760 or wrong.
00:18:45.200 They're just 1.00
00:18:45.480 silly. 0.99
00:18:46.060 No, 1.00
00:18:46.360 they're just
00:18:47.020 mockery.
00:18:48.340 They're fodder
00:18:48.920 for mockery
00:18:49.720 and our
00:18:50.500 enjoyment.
00:18:51.320 So let's
00:18:51.640 use them
00:18:51.920 that way.
00:18:52.260 Well, how
00:18:55.020 much assault
00:18:55.840 are we
00:18:56.460 getting on
00:18:56.880 ESG and
00:18:57.680 DEI?
00:18:58.760 There's an
00:18:59.240 opinion piece
00:18:59.860 today in the
00:19:00.280 Wall Street
00:19:00.600 Journal about
00:19:02.200 those two
00:19:02.760 things from
00:19:04.340 Alicia Finley.
00:19:06.600 And let me
00:19:07.200 read two
00:19:08.800 criticisms that
00:19:10.480 I'm not sure
00:19:11.140 you would have
00:19:11.560 seen a year
00:19:12.140 ago.
00:19:13.620 Ask me if
00:19:14.460 somebody would
00:19:14.960 have said
00:19:15.200 this out
00:19:16.220 loud in a
00:19:17.000 major opinion
00:19:17.580 piece one
00:19:18.560 year ago.
00:19:19.000 So Alicia
00:19:21.220 Finley writes,
00:19:22.080 For years
00:19:22.500 America's
00:19:23.200 political class
00:19:24.240 has lamented
00:19:25.500 that too
00:19:26.280 many college
00:19:26.820 grads are
00:19:27.420 working in
00:19:28.040 low-paying
00:19:28.620 jobs that
00:19:29.760 don't require
00:19:30.380 post-secondary
00:19:31.240 degrees.
00:19:32.340 The diversity,
00:19:32.980 equity,
00:19:33.300 and inclusion
00:19:33.640 in environmental,
00:19:34.480 social, and
00:19:34.920 governance
00:19:35.260 industries,
00:19:36.300 DEI and
00:19:37.120 ESG
00:19:37.840 respectively,
00:19:38.900 are solving
00:19:39.740 for this
00:19:40.120 problem while
00:19:42.180 creating many
00:19:42.900 others.
00:19:44.560 So it's not
00:19:45.340 that DEI and
00:19:46.460 ESG solve
00:19:47.260 problems.
00:19:48.480 They solve
00:19:49.040 problems by
00:19:50.020 creating other
00:19:51.280 ones.
00:19:51.940 Now in this
00:19:52.420 context, the
00:19:53.240 problem solved
00:19:54.140 is that somebody
00:19:55.560 is getting a
00:19:56.120 job not
00:19:57.140 serving food,
00:19:58.520 which is a
00:19:59.820 perfectly respectable
00:20:00.780 job, but
00:20:01.940 rather they also
00:20:02.700 can get jobs
00:20:03.600 now in the
00:20:05.080 DEI and
00:20:05.960 ESG field.
00:20:07.340 So people who
00:20:08.320 might have been
00:20:08.760 your waiter are
00:20:10.620 now running
00:20:11.120 your company.
00:20:16.360 Right?
00:20:17.260 Because if
00:20:18.300 you're the
00:20:18.640 CEO and
00:20:19.200 you don't
00:20:19.560 do what
00:20:19.940 the DEI
00:20:20.940 and ESG
00:20:21.600 people tell
00:20:22.180 you you
00:20:22.460 got to
00:20:22.760 do, you
00:20:24.060 know, you
00:20:24.320 could have
00:20:24.620 some trouble.
00:20:26.200 So we
00:20:27.480 took baristas
00:20:28.600 and servers
00:20:30.020 from restaurants
00:20:31.060 and turned
00:20:32.960 them into
00:20:33.400 DEI and ESG
00:20:34.580 professionals.
00:20:35.740 So now
00:20:36.480 that your
00:20:36.800 waiter is
00:20:37.280 running your
00:20:37.700 company.
00:20:41.140 Now, I'm
00:20:42.520 of course using
00:20:43.500 hyperbole, but
00:20:44.660 that is actually
00:20:45.420 what this
00:20:45.840 opinion piece
00:20:47.400 is suggesting,
00:20:49.660 that, you
00:20:50.700 know, there's
00:20:51.080 some connection
00:20:51.620 between the
00:20:52.220 service industry
00:20:53.100 and ESG and
00:20:54.640 DEI.
00:20:55.100 I don't buy
00:20:55.660 that connection.
00:20:56.880 There's not so
00:20:57.680 many people in
00:20:58.380 DEI and ESG
00:20:59.340 that it's taking a
00:21:00.640 bite out of the
00:21:01.140 service industry.
00:21:02.140 But it's a funny
00:21:02.860 comparison, right?
00:21:04.480 So what is ESG
00:21:05.680 and DEI good for?
00:21:07.400 For mocking.
00:21:09.060 For mocking.
00:21:09.680 So this is perfect.
00:21:10.380 So it doesn't
00:21:11.560 matter that it's
00:21:12.040 real, you know,
00:21:13.120 that that comparison
00:21:14.420 of servers to
00:21:15.600 ESG, that's not
00:21:17.040 like a real
00:21:17.640 comparison, but
00:21:18.680 it's fun mockery.
00:21:20.060 And that's all
00:21:20.860 it's good for.
00:21:21.900 That's the only
00:21:22.780 thing ESG and
00:21:23.620 DEI are good 1.00
00:21:24.200 for, just our
00:21:25.020 jokes.
00:21:26.020 Because anybody
00:21:26.800 who's doing it at
00:21:27.480 this point is
00:21:28.180 simply just a
00:21:28.900 racist.
00:21:31.280 We don't have
00:21:32.340 to, we don't
00:21:32.720 have to, you
00:21:34.180 know, soften
00:21:36.300 our words.
00:21:36.940 If you're
00:21:38.120 involved in
00:21:38.860 any way in
00:21:39.780 promoting ESG
00:21:40.560 and DEI, you're
00:21:41.500 just a flat-out 1.00
00:21:42.300 racist.
00:21:44.860 And it doesn't
00:21:45.540 matter what
00:21:45.900 group you're in.
00:21:46.720 Again, it has
00:21:47.420 nothing to do
00:21:48.000 with what group
00:21:48.620 you're in.
00:21:49.080 As an individual,
00:21:50.620 I would judge
00:21:51.780 you to be a 0.98
00:21:52.240 racist. 0.99
00:21:53.480 And I would 0.62
00:21:53.860 try to stay
00:21:54.340 away from you
00:21:54.840 if I could,
00:21:55.820 no matter what
00:21:57.220 race you were,
00:21:57.840 because that's
00:21:58.200 not the important
00:21:58.800 part.
00:21:59.540 The important
00:21:59.920 part is, if
00:22:01.180 the content of
00:22:01.900 your character
00:22:02.520 drove you to be
00:22:03.880 an ESG or
00:22:04.720 DEI professional,
00:22:05.720 sorry about
00:22:07.520 your character,
00:22:09.240 sorry, your
00:22:10.280 character needs
00:22:10.960 a little work.
00:22:13.660 All right,
00:22:14.620 and as I
00:22:15.800 said, the
00:22:16.180 reasoning is 0.99
00:22:17.260 because black 0.99
00:22:19.400 people are
00:22:20.360 successful all
00:22:21.820 over the place.
00:22:24.280 I mean, the
00:22:24.700 question of can
00:22:25.500 you be black 0.99
00:22:26.240 and successful, 0.91
00:22:27.800 asked and
00:22:28.360 answered, yes.
00:22:30.740 Yes.
00:22:31.580 That's the end
00:22:32.260 of the conversation.
00:22:34.140 Right?
00:22:34.540 Everything else
00:22:36.200 is just an
00:22:36.900 annoyance or
00:22:38.020 something to
00:22:38.620 mock.
00:22:39.460 As long as
00:22:40.040 everybody has
00:22:40.720 some path that
00:22:42.300 works for
00:22:42.840 everybody, I
00:22:44.140 mean, basically
00:22:44.620 everybody who
00:22:45.280 does the same
00:22:45.820 stuff gets a
00:22:46.520 good result.
00:22:47.680 Almost everybody.
00:22:49.580 Stay out of
00:22:50.140 jail, stay off
00:22:50.880 drugs, don't get
00:22:52.360 married until
00:22:53.020 you're a little
00:22:53.960 bit more
00:22:54.340 established, get
00:22:56.120 a job, build
00:22:56.860 some skills.
00:22:58.060 It's worked for
00:22:58.700 100% of people.
00:23:00.920 So pretending
00:23:01.600 that doesn't
00:23:03.460 work anymore
00:23:04.200 is just, I'm
00:23:05.580 just not going
00:23:06.200 to pretend
00:23:06.560 anymore.
00:23:07.480 I can't
00:23:08.100 pretend that
00:23:09.500 doing all the
00:23:10.220 right things
00:23:10.780 doesn't work.
00:23:12.160 And that's
00:23:12.780 what a lot of
00:23:13.440 the DEI and
00:23:14.200 ESG stuff, it
00:23:15.800 asks you to
00:23:16.560 pretend that
00:23:18.080 doing the
00:23:18.660 obvious, easy,
00:23:20.040 simple, direct,
00:23:21.420 clear things that
00:23:22.700 have worked for
00:23:23.280 every person since
00:23:24.360 the beginning of
00:23:25.000 time just don't
00:23:26.360 work for one
00:23:26.880 group.
00:23:28.140 What could be
00:23:28.740 more racist than
00:23:29.540 that?
00:23:31.060 That is the
00:23:32.400 most racist
00:23:33.040 thing you could
00:23:33.640 ever come up
00:23:34.280 with.
00:23:34.960 You could think
00:23:35.680 all day long to
00:23:36.640 try to come up
00:23:37.200 with something
00:23:37.560 more racist, but
00:23:39.160 you couldn't.
00:23:40.640 That's like
00:23:41.200 peak.
00:23:42.460 Anyway, here's
00:23:46.360 a good example
00:23:47.180 of, change the
00:23:48.540 subject a little
00:23:49.120 bit here, of
00:23:50.680 word salad.
00:23:51.540 I like to give
00:23:52.200 you examples of
00:23:53.220 where I trigger
00:23:54.020 people into word
00:23:54.840 salad, because
00:23:56.240 every time you
00:23:56.780 see one, it
00:23:57.900 makes it a little
00:23:58.480 easier to
00:23:59.240 identify the
00:23:59.860 next one.
00:24:00.800 Now, the word
00:24:01.380 salad can pop
00:24:02.660 up in a variety
00:24:03.440 of places, but
00:24:05.080 my context is
00:24:07.000 that if somebody
00:24:08.560 makes a point
00:24:09.840 in public that
00:24:12.700 you rip apart
00:24:13.960 and show them
00:24:15.040 to be wrong,
00:24:16.980 they don't
00:24:17.780 usually change
00:24:18.500 their mind and
00:24:18.940 say, well,
00:24:19.280 that's a good
00:24:19.680 point.
00:24:20.140 Sometimes they
00:24:20.700 do, if it's a
00:24:21.820 weakly held
00:24:22.400 opinion.
00:24:23.180 But if it's a
00:24:23.840 strongly held
00:24:24.420 opinion, they
00:24:25.780 tend to double
00:24:27.420 down and say
00:24:28.660 words that
00:24:30.820 no longer
00:24:31.600 make sense,
00:24:32.640 but they're
00:24:33.240 sure they
00:24:33.640 do.
00:24:34.740 You want to
00:24:35.100 see an
00:24:35.320 example?
00:24:36.460 All right.
00:24:37.700 So there was
00:24:38.860 a title and
00:24:39.720 an article that
00:24:41.120 said that
00:24:41.840 RFK Jr., this
00:24:45.560 is the exact
00:24:46.060 title, RFK Jr.
00:24:47.160 suggested COVID
00:24:48.100 is a Chinese
00:24:48.840 bioweapon
00:24:49.620 ethnically targeted
00:24:51.060 to attack 0.96
00:24:51.760 Caucasians and 1.00
00:24:52.680 black people and
00:24:53.900 to spare 0.98
00:24:54.380 Ashkenazi Jews 0.90
00:24:56.140 and Chinese
00:24:56.740 people.
00:24:57.540 All right.
00:24:57.680 So that was a
00:24:58.300 headline attacking
00:24:59.620 RFK Jr.
00:25:00.920 and saying that
00:25:01.440 he suggested
00:25:02.600 COVID is a
00:25:04.080 Chinese bioweapon. 1.00
00:25:05.780 I tweeted in
00:25:07.020 response to that
00:25:07.980 because that was
00:25:09.080 misleading.
00:25:09.980 I said, instead
00:25:10.740 of saying that
00:25:11.360 he suggested
00:25:12.600 COVID is a
00:25:13.920 Chinese bioweapon, 1.00
00:25:15.780 how about
00:25:16.360 suggested it
00:25:17.280 might be?
00:25:18.720 Or suggested
00:25:19.720 it looks like
00:25:20.340 it could be?
00:25:21.900 Would you have
00:25:22.680 any problem if
00:25:23.460 he said, you
00:25:24.420 know, it looks
00:25:25.260 like it could
00:25:25.800 be?
00:25:27.860 Who would have
00:25:28.840 a problem with
00:25:29.380 that?
00:25:30.760 Because we know
00:25:31.520 it came from
00:25:31.960 the lab, and
00:25:32.660 they weren't
00:25:33.320 putting it in
00:25:33.800 the lab just
00:25:34.380 for fun.
00:25:36.120 They weren't
00:25:36.760 putting it in
00:25:37.220 the lab to
00:25:37.660 make it safer.
00:25:39.080 No, they were
00:25:39.520 putting it in
00:25:40.040 the lab to
00:25:41.280 make it a
00:25:41.740 weapon.
00:25:42.520 And if you
00:25:43.000 had a choice
00:25:43.660 of making a
00:25:45.060 weapon that
00:25:45.520 would kill 0.98
00:25:45.960 one ethnicity 0.97
00:25:47.020 more than
00:25:47.620 another, well,
00:25:48.880 that would be
00:25:49.260 the height of
00:25:49.820 evil.
00:25:50.900 It's hard to
00:25:51.500 imagine a more
00:25:52.100 evil thing that
00:25:52.880 you could do.
00:25:53.360 But in the
00:25:54.860 context of
00:25:56.220 war, yeah, I
00:25:57.880 can imagine
00:25:58.420 it.
00:25:59.600 I can imagine
00:26:00.680 China coming up 0.97
00:26:02.320 with a virus if
00:26:03.580 they could.
00:26:04.340 I'm not saying
00:26:05.000 this is it.
00:26:05.920 But if they
00:26:06.440 could, you
00:26:08.140 would imagine
00:26:08.660 that would be a
00:26:09.300 variable they
00:26:09.820 would care about.
00:26:11.200 Right?
00:26:11.600 Because if it
00:26:12.160 gets out there,
00:26:13.580 well, they're
00:26:14.140 relatively protected.
00:26:15.780 Now, I don't
00:26:16.220 think that the
00:26:16.960 COVID was
00:26:19.460 necessarily
00:26:20.060 demonstrated to
00:26:21.080 target ethnicities.
00:26:22.260 I believe that
00:26:24.280 black Americans
00:26:25.100 had a tough 0.78
00:26:25.640 time with
00:26:26.080 COVID, but
00:26:27.380 they also have
00:26:27.980 low vitamin
00:26:28.540 D.
00:26:30.160 To me, the
00:26:31.000 correlation that
00:26:31.740 looks pretty
00:26:32.340 obvious is that
00:26:33.280 wherever there
00:26:33.760 was low vitamin
00:26:34.420 D, there were
00:26:35.040 problems with
00:26:35.940 COVID.
00:26:37.540 It's just that
00:26:38.380 correlation is
00:26:39.040 pretty clear.
00:26:40.100 But of course,
00:26:40.880 bad health
00:26:41.560 probably gives
00:26:42.700 you bad vitamin
00:26:43.800 D, so there's a
00:26:44.800 causation problem
00:26:45.620 there.
00:26:46.100 But the
00:26:46.420 correlation is
00:26:47.080 strong.
00:26:48.440 And here's,
00:26:50.480 all right, so
00:26:51.020 getting back to
00:26:51.560 my word salad.
00:26:52.260 So the
00:26:53.240 headline says
00:26:54.160 that RFK
00:26:54.680 suggested COVID
00:26:56.020 is, I said
00:26:57.180 it would be
00:26:57.780 better to say
00:26:58.480 suggested it
00:26:59.560 might be.
00:27:00.800 Because everybody
00:27:01.400 would agree with
00:27:02.700 suggested it
00:27:03.440 might be,
00:27:04.780 because all you
00:27:05.480 have to do is
00:27:05.920 prove that it
00:27:06.540 looks like it
00:27:07.360 had disparate
00:27:08.420 outcomes.
00:27:09.980 But if you
00:27:10.640 say suggested
00:27:11.680 it is, then
00:27:13.420 the way you
00:27:13.820 hear it, even
00:27:14.720 though the
00:27:14.980 words are
00:27:15.300 kind of similar
00:27:15.940 in meaning,
00:27:16.940 the way you
00:27:17.420 hear it is he
00:27:18.100 thinks it's
00:27:18.660 true.
00:27:20.080 That's really
00:27:20.780 different.
00:27:21.220 than
00:27:22.420 suggests it
00:27:23.180 might be.
00:27:24.820 Right.
00:27:25.600 So a
00:27:26.400 critic came
00:27:27.680 into my
00:27:28.340 comment and
00:27:28.980 said, so
00:27:29.940 this is before
00:27:30.740 the word
00:27:31.100 is held,
00:27:31.980 disingenuously
00:27:32.780 suggesting a
00:27:33.740 falsehood,
00:27:34.780 talk about
00:27:35.260 RFK,
00:27:36.300 disingenuously
00:27:37.120 suggesting a
00:27:38.200 falsehood for
00:27:39.320 the malicious
00:27:39.880 intent of
00:27:40.620 misleading a
00:27:41.340 particular weak
00:27:42.000 minded segment of
00:27:42.740 the populace is
00:27:44.000 indeed dangerous.
00:27:44.900 So then I
00:27:47.300 ask this, are
00:27:47.920 you opposed to
00:27:48.600 all forms of
00:27:49.320 inquiry or
00:27:50.180 only this one?
00:27:51.420 Now this is the
00:27:52.340 trigger for the
00:27:52.920 cognitive dissonance.
00:27:55.060 Because my
00:27:55.940 point is, asking
00:27:57.500 questions isn't a
00:27:58.480 problem, noticing
00:28:00.200 correlations is not
00:28:01.540 a problem.
00:28:02.840 Pointing out that
00:28:03.680 there's a
00:28:04.060 correlation and
00:28:04.820 you noticed it
00:28:05.560 is not a
00:28:06.500 problem.
00:28:07.560 Asking if maybe
00:28:08.540 we should dig
00:28:09.120 into this
00:28:09.700 correlation that
00:28:11.620 you noticed
00:28:12.220 is not a
00:28:13.380 problem.
00:28:14.240 In fact, it
00:28:15.360 would be basic
00:28:16.060 to the
00:28:16.440 scientific process,
00:28:18.940 right?
00:28:19.480 Somebody has a
00:28:20.320 question, seems
00:28:21.600 like a good
00:28:22.100 question, there's
00:28:22.860 a correlation,
00:28:23.740 look into it.
00:28:24.760 Scientific process.
00:28:27.160 So once I
00:28:27.920 pointed out that
00:28:28.840 asking questions
00:28:30.080 and looking at
00:28:31.080 correlations, I
00:28:33.160 said it cleverly,
00:28:34.000 are you opposed
00:28:34.500 to all forms of
00:28:35.220 inquiry or only
00:28:36.560 this one?
00:28:37.500 Listen to the
00:28:38.360 next response,
00:28:39.680 which I expected
00:28:41.120 to be word
00:28:41.720 salad.
00:28:42.900 Now you tell
00:28:43.420 me if this
00:28:43.880 sounds like
00:28:44.320 word salad to
00:28:45.020 you.
00:28:46.440 No.
00:28:47.540 Inquiry is the
00:28:48.320 first step in
00:28:48.940 the scientific
00:28:49.460 method.
00:28:50.080 Okay, so far
00:28:51.220 so good.
00:28:51.760 We're on the
00:28:52.100 same page.
00:28:53.500 I'm opposed to
00:28:54.300 suggesting malicious
00:28:55.080 intent over
00:28:55.860 inflammatory rhetoric
00:28:57.080 designed to
00:28:58.040 galvanize smooth
00:28:58.940 brain distrust
00:28:59.700 as a tool.
00:29:00.800 That's far more
00:29:01.660 effective than
00:29:02.280 unproven genetic
00:29:03.200 targeting espoused
00:29:04.120 by this
00:29:04.500 pseudo-intellectual.
00:29:06.520 What?
00:29:08.920 What?
00:29:09.480 What?
00:29:12.220 I don't
00:29:12.980 understand any
00:29:13.640 of those words.
00:29:14.820 I mean, I know
00:29:15.260 what the words
00:29:15.760 mean, but when
00:29:17.160 they're put
00:29:17.460 together, do
00:29:18.020 they make any
00:29:18.540 sense?
00:29:19.580 Now, of course,
00:29:20.340 he defended it
00:29:21.440 and said, I'm 0.97
00:29:22.000 dumb, because 0.99
00:29:22.640 anybody would 1.00
00:29:23.240 understand what
00:29:23.900 he said.
00:29:24.220 But do you
00:29:27.960 see this as
00:29:28.520 word salad?
00:29:29.320 How many
00:29:29.760 would agree
00:29:30.360 that that
00:29:33.080 was a
00:29:33.660 cognitive
00:29:34.800 dissonance
00:29:35.640 trigger
00:29:36.760 that clearly
00:29:38.260 created word
00:29:39.060 salad?
00:29:40.260 You can see
00:29:40.980 it, right?
00:29:41.980 Once you see a
00:29:42.920 number of
00:29:43.320 examples, it's
00:29:44.080 just really
00:29:44.460 obvious you
00:29:44.920 can pick
00:29:45.240 them out.
00:29:46.920 So, I
00:29:48.220 saw Brian
00:29:48.760 Romelli, who
00:29:49.760 I always talk
00:29:51.140 about and tweet
00:29:51.840 about, who's
00:29:53.160 an expert on
00:29:53.960 AI and other
00:29:55.600 technology stuff.
00:29:57.040 He's just a
00:29:57.560 real smart
00:29:58.000 guy.
00:29:59.260 And he was
00:30:00.000 saying the
00:30:00.360 other day
00:30:00.740 that something
00:30:01.600 I've been
00:30:01.980 saying, which
00:30:02.980 is that the
00:30:04.800 big aha from
00:30:06.280 AI will not
00:30:08.120 be how cool
00:30:08.840 the AI is and
00:30:09.780 what it does
00:30:10.240 for us.
00:30:10.800 That's just
00:30:11.220 cool.
00:30:12.160 But the
00:30:12.500 big aha will
00:30:15.440 be learning what
00:30:16.700 human beings
00:30:17.540 always were.
00:30:18.400 And this
00:30:20.400 word salad
00:30:21.020 suggestion, this
00:30:22.280 word salad
00:30:22.760 example, this
00:30:24.460 is it.
00:30:25.620 This is what
00:30:26.260 AI is telling
00:30:27.140 you, too.
00:30:28.560 AI is telling
00:30:29.380 you that your
00:30:30.080 intelligence, your
00:30:31.220 so-called
00:30:31.680 intelligence, is
00:30:32.860 just pattern
00:30:33.380 recognition.
00:30:34.840 That's all it
00:30:35.400 is.
00:30:36.180 It's just doing
00:30:36.840 the thing that
00:30:37.520 seems like the
00:30:38.140 next thing that
00:30:38.720 should happen.
00:30:40.100 And we think
00:30:41.120 we're smart.
00:30:42.860 We're not.
00:30:44.420 We're just the
00:30:45.240 AI.
00:30:46.100 We're just a
00:30:46.660 pattern recognition.
00:30:47.420 And so this
00:30:49.140 cognitive dissonance
00:30:50.360 thing, what it
00:30:51.560 does is it
00:30:52.180 breaks up your
00:30:53.160 pattern recognition
00:30:54.660 processor in your
00:30:56.880 brain.
00:30:57.700 So once your
00:30:58.360 pattern recognition
00:30:59.200 processor gets
00:31:00.100 turned off or
00:31:01.060 broken, which is
00:31:02.380 what I do with
00:31:03.140 the triggers, once
00:31:05.380 it's broken,
00:31:06.460 something is still
00:31:07.340 going to come
00:31:07.760 out, but it
00:31:08.720 won't conform to
00:31:09.540 pattern anymore
00:31:10.260 because you broke
00:31:10.800 the pattern.
00:31:12.140 So what comes
00:31:12.980 out doesn't sound
00:31:13.840 like it makes
00:31:14.840 sense because your
00:31:16.300 brain is looking
00:31:16.920 for a pattern
00:31:17.600 but I broke
00:31:18.780 the pattern
00:31:19.240 generator in
00:31:19.980 another brain,
00:31:21.160 so temporarily
00:31:21.840 it's spouting
00:31:22.440 things that
00:31:22.960 don't conform to
00:31:24.100 a pattern.
00:31:24.840 You don't even
00:31:25.560 recognize it.
00:31:26.660 You can't even
00:31:27.240 tell what they're
00:31:27.740 saying because
00:31:28.860 the pattern is
00:31:29.360 broken.
00:31:30.840 That's all.
00:31:31.260 Word salad is
00:31:32.020 just pattern
00:31:32.460 break, breaking
00:31:33.780 the pattern,
00:31:34.440 because the words
00:31:35.180 individually make
00:31:36.040 sense.
00:31:36.880 You can even
00:31:37.420 argue that the
00:31:38.080 sentence makes
00:31:38.660 sense, but
00:31:39.840 somehow together
00:31:40.700 none of it
00:31:41.240 makes sense.
00:31:42.500 No pattern.
00:31:43.080 All right.
00:31:47.740 Canadian wildfires
00:31:49.100 are now affecting
00:31:50.960 Montana to
00:31:52.040 Ohio.
00:31:53.680 So we're being
00:31:54.760 attacked by poison
00:31:55.940 from the south in
00:31:56.880 the form of
00:31:57.320 fentanyl, and
00:31:58.800 now poison from
00:31:59.820 the north in the
00:32:00.620 form of smoke.
00:32:04.380 You know who
00:32:05.260 feels a little bit
00:32:06.120 safer?
00:32:08.180 Crimea.
00:32:08.580 Yeah.
00:32:13.300 Crimea.
00:32:15.600 Crimea River.
00:32:17.280 All right.
00:32:17.900 We'll talk about
00:32:18.520 Crimea.
00:32:20.160 I don't have much
00:32:21.180 to say about this,
00:32:22.080 but why is Canada
00:32:23.840 becoming our big
00:32:24.700 problem lately?
00:32:26.140 We've had more
00:32:27.480 problems with
00:32:29.000 Canada than we
00:32:31.480 have with Taiwan.
00:32:34.020 All right.
00:32:35.600 There's a new
00:32:36.360 movie coming out,
00:32:37.260 which, believe
00:32:38.580 it or not, is
00:32:39.200 going to change
00:32:39.780 reality.
00:32:42.700 Do you think
00:32:43.060 that's a big
00:32:44.740 claim?
00:32:45.500 There's a new
00:32:46.060 movie.
00:32:46.500 I'll tell you
00:32:46.900 which one it
00:32:47.340 is in a moment.
00:32:49.240 It's going to
00:32:49.660 change reality.
00:32:52.280 All right.
00:32:52.940 It's a movie
00:32:53.580 called The
00:32:54.680 Creator, and I
00:32:56.580 don't know much
00:32:57.140 about it except
00:32:57.740 just I watched
00:32:58.640 the trailer.
00:33:00.540 Apparently it's
00:33:01.020 a new movie.
00:33:02.020 And it's a
00:33:03.200 high-tech,
00:33:04.940 futuristic thing
00:33:05.880 in which AI
00:33:06.920 AI has taken
00:33:08.740 over the world
00:33:09.420 like the
00:33:10.120 Terminator, and
00:33:11.880 the spunky
00:33:12.940 humans are
00:33:13.600 trying to
00:33:14.040 fight it
00:33:14.460 against the
00:33:15.320 machines.
00:33:17.220 Now, I've
00:33:18.620 told you before
00:33:19.360 that when a
00:33:20.620 big movie comes
00:33:21.360 out and it
00:33:21.980 gets into your
00:33:22.440 consciousness, it
00:33:24.040 makes everybody
00:33:24.720 just see that
00:33:26.180 pattern, the
00:33:27.040 pattern that was
00:33:27.680 in the movie,
00:33:28.680 whether it was
00:33:29.340 The Matrix or
00:33:30.340 Soylent Green or
00:33:31.820 The Terminator.
00:33:32.900 The public in
00:33:35.460 general, being
00:33:36.120 mostly NPCs, they
00:33:38.180 use movies to
00:33:40.800 understand reality.
00:33:43.400 So how many
00:33:44.260 times have you
00:33:44.860 been in this
00:33:45.380 conversation?
00:33:46.540 Blah, blah,
00:33:47.200 blah.
00:33:47.720 Oh, you mean
00:33:48.740 like The
00:33:49.160 Matrix?
00:33:51.480 You turn on
00:33:52.460 Andrew Tate
00:33:53.420 interview, blah,
00:33:54.720 blah, blah, the
00:33:55.360 Matrix is trying
00:33:56.140 to get me.
00:33:57.120 You talk about
00:33:57.960 the AI danger,
00:33:59.980 blah, blah,
00:34:00.320 blah.
00:34:00.680 You mean like
00:34:01.280 Terminator?
00:34:02.340 Oh, it's like
00:34:02.920 Skynet, right?
00:34:04.200 So we understand
00:34:05.120 the world through
00:34:05.860 our movies.
00:34:07.540 If you make a
00:34:08.520 new movie that's
00:34:09.280 a blockbuster, it
00:34:10.340 looks like it's a
00:34:10.860 big budget.
00:34:12.220 I mean, let me
00:34:13.520 say for sure, I
00:34:15.300 hate movies.
00:34:16.880 I'll watch this
00:34:17.560 one.
00:34:18.840 Because I tend to
00:34:20.000 watch all the
00:34:20.640 sci-fi stuff.
00:34:22.080 Because when I
00:34:22.540 watch sci-fi,
00:34:24.340 there's one thing
00:34:25.220 that they do
00:34:25.700 well, sci-fi.
00:34:27.260 Their violence is
00:34:28.560 usually not that
00:34:29.480 graphic.
00:34:32.040 I don't mind
00:34:33.340 seeing a
00:34:34.560 spaceship blow
00:34:35.400 up.
00:34:38.000 Like, I don't
00:34:38.860 want to see
00:34:39.200 somebody tied to
00:34:39.960 a chair and
00:34:40.560 tortured.
00:34:41.080 That's like
00:34:41.460 regular movies.
00:34:42.800 But like
00:34:43.300 somebody hits
00:34:43.740 somebody with
00:34:44.140 a phaser,
00:34:44.880 they just go,
00:34:45.600 oh, and
00:34:46.760 there's like a
00:34:47.180 little burn
00:34:47.600 mark here and
00:34:48.220 they seem to
00:34:48.660 be dead. 0.94
00:34:49.620 Nice, clean 1.00
00:34:50.700 violence.
00:34:51.840 The worst
00:34:52.320 thing they do
00:34:52.920 is put people
00:34:53.640 out the airlock
00:34:54.480 and then all
00:34:56.120 of the silence
00:34:56.640 just looks like
00:34:57.340 this, the
00:34:57.720 floating guy,
00:34:59.420 as they slowly
00:35:00.340 turn into ice.
00:35:02.120 It's not that
00:35:03.020 bad.
00:35:04.180 But also,
00:35:05.820 sci-fi has such
00:35:06.900 complicated plots
00:35:09.040 that I never
00:35:10.200 understand the
00:35:10.900 plot.
00:35:12.620 Do you have
00:35:13.320 that problem?
00:35:14.240 It doesn't
00:35:14.720 matter if it's
00:35:15.260 Star Trek.
00:35:16.000 I don't even
00:35:17.280 listen to the
00:35:17.760 plot.
00:35:18.280 I just like the
00:35:18.920 atmospherics.
00:35:20.520 I like putting
00:35:21.280 on headphones and
00:35:22.660 just feeling I'm
00:35:23.420 in the ship.
00:35:24.980 That's why I like
00:35:25.900 them.
00:35:26.440 So I'll watch
00:35:27.020 it.
00:35:27.200 But I worry
00:35:29.280 that this movie,
00:35:30.080 and I don't
00:35:30.420 yet know if
00:35:31.360 it's got like
00:35:31.920 an overall
00:35:32.600 theme other
00:35:33.420 than battling
00:35:34.380 the machines,
00:35:35.800 but if enough
00:35:37.420 people see it,
00:35:38.920 this movie will
00:35:40.660 become the new
00:35:41.400 operating system
00:35:42.420 for how the
00:35:43.160 ordinary public
00:35:44.160 understands AI
00:35:45.820 and AI risks.
00:35:47.360 So the risk of
00:35:49.420 AI, one of the
00:35:50.320 biggest questions
00:35:51.360 in human
00:35:51.960 civilization,
00:35:53.620 will largely be
00:35:54.820 determined by a
00:35:58.220 movie.
00:35:59.580 Probably.
00:36:01.040 Probably the way
00:36:01.980 we treat maybe
00:36:03.220 the biggest risk
00:36:04.440 ever to human
00:36:06.460 civilization,
00:36:07.880 mostly determined
00:36:08.860 by how the movie
00:36:09.720 was written.
00:36:11.120 That's the way
00:36:11.940 this is going to
00:36:12.540 go.
00:36:13.340 Unfortunately,
00:36:14.320 it's a really
00:36:14.940 big risk.
00:36:16.640 Right?
00:36:16.780 I mean, I
00:36:17.360 wouldn't ban
00:36:18.140 the movie or
00:36:18.700 anything, but
00:36:19.680 the risk to
00:36:20.580 civilization is
00:36:21.680 extreme.
00:36:23.000 I haven't seen
00:36:23.560 the movie, so
00:36:24.600 it could be
00:36:25.020 there's nothing
00:36:25.480 in there that's
00:36:26.020 a risk.
00:36:26.800 But if it
00:36:27.480 gives us a
00:36:27.980 bad idea about
00:36:29.640 what we should
00:36:30.300 or should not
00:36:30.900 do with AI,
00:36:31.900 it would change
00:36:32.520 civilization itself.
00:36:35.180 That's a hell
00:36:35.860 of a thing.
00:36:38.840 All right.
00:36:41.480 I saw
00:36:42.120 Jonathan
00:36:42.480 Torley writing
00:36:43.100 in the Hill
00:36:43.500 that the
00:36:43.980 colleges and
00:36:44.600 universities
00:36:45.180 have vowed
00:36:47.220 to make sure
00:36:48.060 that they
00:36:48.480 stay racist.
00:36:50.100 Isn't that
00:36:50.420 a weird thing
00:36:50.960 to vow?
00:36:52.580 Because the
00:36:53.200 affirmative action
00:36:54.860 ruling by
00:36:55.560 the Supreme
00:36:56.360 Court told
00:36:57.720 them they
00:36:58.100 can't use
00:36:58.880 race directly
00:37:00.080 as a main
00:37:01.620 variable in
00:37:02.480 admissions,
00:37:04.340 but apparently
00:37:05.460 there are lots
00:37:06.000 of workarounds
00:37:06.800 that they can
00:37:07.260 do to massage
00:37:08.380 the system,
00:37:09.140 so they end
00:37:09.880 up with the
00:37:10.320 same outcome,
00:37:11.120 but without
00:37:13.160 running afoul
00:37:14.260 of the law.
00:37:15.920 And to me
00:37:16.580 it's just
00:37:16.920 amazing that
00:37:19.540 there are
00:37:20.620 people who
00:37:21.060 are fighting
00:37:21.460 hard to
00:37:22.040 maintain
00:37:22.620 discrimination
00:37:23.500 in 2020.
00:37:26.740 How proud
00:37:28.220 would you be
00:37:28.740 if you fought
00:37:29.340 hard to
00:37:29.860 maintain
00:37:30.500 discrimination
00:37:31.320 against race?
00:37:33.260 That's what
00:37:33.780 they're doing.
00:37:34.780 They're like
00:37:35.140 working hard.
00:37:36.700 They're having
00:37:37.080 meetings and
00:37:38.040 discussions.
00:37:38.940 How can we
00:37:39.540 stay as racist
00:37:40.340 as possible?
00:37:42.240 Yeah, no.
00:37:44.600 Alright, so
00:37:45.320 that's terrible 0.99
00:37:45.880 for black 0.99
00:37:46.600 Americans, of 0.61
00:37:47.320 course, because
00:37:48.820 I was saying 0.82
00:37:50.560 that black 1.00
00:37:51.100 Americans got 0.98
00:37:51.840 promoted, and
00:37:53.900 it's like the
00:37:54.440 best freedom
00:37:55.660 you could ever
00:37:56.160 have, which
00:37:57.200 is to be free
00:37:58.280 to live your
00:37:59.680 life without
00:38:00.700 people imagining
00:38:01.760 that somebody
00:38:02.660 gave you what
00:38:03.480 you earned.
00:38:05.000 That's a pretty
00:38:05.780 big deal.
00:38:07.300 You don't want
00:38:07.760 people to think
00:38:08.320 that you didn't
00:38:08.840 work for, or
00:38:09.940 you didn't
00:38:10.420 deserve or
00:38:11.460 earn what
00:38:12.140 you achieved.
00:38:14.060 But it looks
00:38:14.960 like colleges
00:38:15.420 and universities
00:38:16.120 want to keep
00:38:16.880 us guessing
00:38:17.420 as to whether
00:38:18.760 black Americans
00:38:20.760 achieved what
00:38:22.080 they achieved
00:38:22.560 on merit or
00:38:23.520 some other
00:38:24.560 weird system
00:38:25.320 that the
00:38:25.660 colleges wanted
00:38:26.440 to implement.
00:38:27.860 Let me say
00:38:28.600 again that I
00:38:29.160 don't care about 0.99
00:38:30.220 black people. 1.00
00:38:32.200 I care about
00:38:33.040 black individuals.
00:38:35.160 That'll get 0.99
00:38:35.800 taken out of
00:38:36.360 context.
00:38:37.360 Watch this.
00:38:37.780 Now, I
00:38:38.800 love black
00:38:39.300 individuals like
00:38:41.140 I like every
00:38:42.640 individual,
00:38:44.300 irrespective of
00:38:45.980 race.
00:38:46.620 But stop
00:38:47.640 making me care 0.99
00:38:48.680 about black
00:38:49.460 people as a
00:38:50.280 group, because
00:38:51.360 I also don't
00:38:51.980 care about white 0.97
00:38:52.820 people as a
00:38:53.840 group.
00:38:55.160 I don't care
00:38:55.920 about women as
00:38:56.800 a group, men
00:38:57.420 as a group,
00:38:57.900 gays as a
00:38:58.440 group. 0.96
00:38:59.040 I don't care
00:38:59.620 about them as
00:39:00.140 groups anymore.
00:39:01.220 Because the
00:39:02.160 scientists maybe
00:39:02.940 should study that,
00:39:03.920 and if they learn
00:39:04.500 anything, they can
00:39:05.120 tell us.
00:39:05.560 But if you
00:39:06.680 and I are
00:39:07.200 worried about
00:39:07.760 group equality,
00:39:09.580 we're just
00:39:10.240 working on the
00:39:10.780 wrong stuff.
00:39:11.940 You and I
00:39:12.460 should be
00:39:12.780 working on
00:39:13.240 individual,
00:39:15.160 individual,
00:39:16.800 one-to-one,
00:39:18.020 hey, you're
00:39:18.860 okay, am I
00:39:20.280 okay with you?
00:39:21.080 Okay, we're
00:39:21.560 good.
00:39:22.460 You get that
00:39:23.100 right and
00:39:23.440 everything works.
00:39:24.740 As soon as
00:39:25.380 you let the
00:39:25.900 grifters and
00:39:26.760 the people
00:39:28.340 make money on
00:39:29.080 this stuff,
00:39:29.680 as soon as
00:39:30.100 they let you
00:39:30.680 imagine that
00:39:31.520 you have a
00:39:31.960 conversation about
00:39:32.940 a group,
00:39:34.200 just excuse
00:39:35.760 yourself.
00:39:37.300 Excuse yourself.
00:39:38.800 You say, you
00:39:39.160 know, I'll talk
00:39:39.860 all day about
00:39:40.560 how to handle
00:39:41.240 individuals and
00:39:42.780 how to make
00:39:43.200 an individual
00:39:43.700 succeed despite
00:39:45.380 whatever obstacles
00:39:47.720 there are.
00:39:49.760 But don't tell
00:39:50.560 me that I have
00:39:51.300 to treat a
00:39:51.780 group like it's
00:39:52.700 an entity.
00:39:54.640 There's no such
00:39:55.400 thing as a
00:39:55.860 group.
00:39:56.320 The whole idea
00:39:57.160 of a group is
00:39:57.940 like this mental
00:39:58.640 construct.
00:40:00.380 The group never
00:40:01.160 comes into your
00:40:01.840 room.
00:40:02.080 What happens
00:40:04.500 to the group
00:40:05.000 just isn't
00:40:05.940 irrelevant anymore.
00:40:07.860 Now, this is
00:40:09.120 a newer opinion
00:40:11.780 of mine.
00:40:13.160 And I would
00:40:13.680 agree that
00:40:14.900 there were times
00:40:15.980 in history,
00:40:16.680 and not very
00:40:17.260 long ago,
00:40:18.500 where looking
00:40:19.160 at the group
00:40:20.260 discrimination
00:40:21.040 made perfect
00:40:21.780 sense.
00:40:22.740 It made perfect
00:40:23.300 sense because
00:40:24.040 things were so
00:40:24.600 bad.
00:40:26.000 But at some
00:40:26.520 point, and that
00:40:27.940 point has to be
00:40:28.620 long before
00:40:29.480 everything's equal
00:40:30.340 everywhere, way
00:40:31.560 before that, if
00:40:32.940 you could ever
00:40:33.340 get to that
00:40:33.760 point, you
00:40:34.820 need to stop
00:40:35.600 direct
00:40:36.680 discrimination.
00:40:39.140 And just work
00:40:40.280 on individual
00:40:40.900 success, and
00:40:42.360 that's where we
00:40:42.740 are.
00:40:43.240 So the big
00:40:43.740 shift should be
00:40:45.360 that everybody's
00:40:46.160 talking about
00:40:46.620 groups, they're
00:40:48.040 in the wrong
00:40:48.460 conversation.
00:40:50.060 They're not
00:40:50.680 right, they're
00:40:51.200 not wrong,
00:40:51.760 they're just not
00:40:52.260 in a useful
00:40:52.780 conversation, it's
00:40:53.760 not anything you
00:40:54.460 should be
00:40:55.240 concerned about,
00:40:56.720 or put any
00:40:57.680 time or effort
00:40:58.360 into.
00:40:58.620 You should
00:40:59.560 put no time
00:41:00.300 or effort
00:41:00.640 into making
00:41:01.580 a group, no
00:41:03.820 matter who
00:41:04.200 they are,
00:41:05.620 better off.
00:41:07.160 But you
00:41:07.580 should certainly
00:41:08.220 put attention
00:41:08.960 into making
00:41:09.480 yourself better
00:41:10.200 off, and
00:41:11.200 anybody who
00:41:11.800 asks for help,
00:41:12.680 any individual.
00:41:13.820 So you should
00:41:14.220 treat people
00:41:15.060 like kings and
00:41:15.860 queens, and 0.98
00:41:17.700 you should treat
00:41:18.240 groups like
00:41:19.080 that's just 1.00
00:41:19.560 bullshit. 1.00
00:41:21.160 Groups are 1.00
00:41:21.840 bullshit. 1.00
00:41:23.140 People are 1.00
00:41:24.740 awesome.
00:41:26.280 That's the
00:41:26.920 bottom line.
00:41:27.440 Groups are 1.00
00:41:27.840 bullshit, people 1.00
00:41:28.600 are awesome. 1.00
00:41:30.240 So live your
00:41:30.860 life that way, I
00:41:31.540 recommend.
00:41:33.280 Rasmussen had a
00:41:34.140 poll talking
00:41:35.360 about this
00:41:35.780 affirmative action,
00:41:36.720 and the Supreme
00:41:38.080 Court's striking
00:41:38.760 down of
00:41:39.240 affirmative action
00:41:40.060 was popular
00:41:41.040 with two-thirds
00:41:41.980 of the public.
00:41:43.380 Two-thirds of
00:41:44.040 the public was
00:41:44.840 against discriminating
00:41:46.280 by race.
00:41:48.380 What?
00:41:49.880 Only two-thirds?
00:41:52.320 Only two-thirds
00:41:53.520 were against
00:41:54.100 racial discrimination?
00:41:56.240 I would hope
00:41:58.460 that would be
00:41:58.840 higher.
00:41:59.800 But let me
00:42:00.440 ask the question
00:42:01.260 in a different
00:42:01.700 way.
00:42:04.280 And we'll
00:42:05.000 just see how
00:42:06.240 smart you are,
00:42:07.160 and I think
00:42:08.220 you'll probably
00:42:09.180 get it within
00:42:09.820 three points.
00:42:12.680 You're so
00:42:13.020 smart.
00:42:14.200 But what
00:42:14.900 percent,
00:42:15.420 according to
00:42:15.780 Rasmussen,
00:42:16.880 disapprove of
00:42:17.860 the Supreme
00:42:18.300 Court's decision
00:42:19.000 and therefore
00:42:19.580 are in favor
00:42:20.420 of continued
00:42:21.100 discrimination
00:42:21.860 by race?
00:42:24.280 28%.
00:42:24.840 28%.
00:42:25.960 Excellent
00:42:27.920 guessing.
00:42:29.180 You are all
00:42:29.700 very close.
00:42:30.480 The smartest
00:42:31.040 audience in
00:42:31.980 all of politics.
00:42:34.060 Impressive.
00:42:37.680 Kamala Harris,
00:42:38.680 as you know,
00:42:39.340 is sort of
00:42:40.140 taking the lead
00:42:40.740 on AI for
00:42:41.620 the government.
00:42:43.020 And last
00:42:43.880 week she
00:42:44.240 convened a
00:42:44.740 group of
00:42:45.260 civil rights
00:42:45.900 and labor
00:42:47.680 leaders to
00:42:50.880 discuss the
00:42:51.580 field of
00:42:52.060 artificial
00:42:52.500 intelligence.
00:42:53.680 Bloomberg is
00:42:54.520 reporting that.
00:42:55.960 Yeah.
00:42:56.340 So the
00:42:56.760 person that
00:42:57.240 we put in
00:42:57.740 charge of
00:42:58.460 AI decided
00:43:00.380 that a good
00:43:00.980 strong place
00:43:01.800 to start
00:43:02.620 the protection
00:43:04.440 of humanity
00:43:05.760 was by
00:43:06.980 convening a
00:43:07.620 group of
00:43:08.020 civil rights
00:43:08.540 and labor
00:43:08.960 leaders.
00:43:10.740 Do you
00:43:11.200 know who I
00:43:11.640 don't care
00:43:12.100 about?
00:43:13.040 Civil rights
00:43:13.700 and labor
00:43:14.140 leaders.
00:43:16.680 Here's AI.
00:43:18.400 Here's AI.
00:43:19.560 Here's a
00:43:20.360 civil rights
00:43:21.220 and labor
00:43:21.740 leaders.
00:43:22.960 Over here.
00:43:24.260 Like way
00:43:24.800 over here.
00:43:27.820 Is she
00:43:28.540 the most 0.99
00:43:28.940 incompetent 0.99
00:43:29.600 vice president
00:43:30.260 we've ever
00:43:30.740 had?
00:43:32.000 I mean,
00:43:32.360 Dan Quayle
00:43:32.940 was kind
00:43:33.780 of impressive.
00:43:36.000 I think
00:43:36.560 she's out
00:43:37.000 Quayle
00:43:37.500 Quayle.
00:43:38.360 And that
00:43:38.600 was pretty
00:43:39.240 hard.
00:43:40.620 Just to
00:43:41.580 keep it
00:43:41.980 not
00:43:42.700 Democrat
00:43:44.120 or Republican.
00:43:45.700 Dan Quayle
00:43:46.540 was not.
00:43:47.180 Do you
00:43:48.180 remember what
00:43:48.580 the problem
00:43:48.960 was with
00:43:49.380 Dan Quayle
00:43:49.940 or why
00:43:50.480 there was
00:43:50.800 a Dan
00:43:51.180 Quayle?
00:43:54.080 Here's
00:43:54.560 the problem.
00:43:55.680 And I
00:43:55.900 always say
00:43:56.260 this, but
00:43:56.620 it's funny
00:43:57.040 every time
00:43:57.460 I say it,
00:43:58.000 so I'm
00:43:58.220 going to
00:43:58.340 say it
00:43:58.620 again.
00:43:59.820 The main
00:44:00.600 requirement
00:44:01.100 of a
00:44:01.560 vice
00:44:01.760 president
00:44:02.180 is to
00:44:02.640 look less
00:44:03.120 capable
00:44:03.540 than the
00:44:04.000 president.
00:44:04.740 That's
00:44:05.000 like the
00:44:05.300 main
00:44:05.540 thing.
00:44:06.300 Just stay
00:44:06.780 out of
00:44:07.000 trouble
00:44:07.260 and look
00:44:08.420 clearly
00:44:09.040 less
00:44:10.020 capable
00:44:10.840 than the
00:44:11.320 president.
00:44:12.940 So you
00:44:13.180 had Ronald
00:44:13.620 Reagan,
00:44:14.760 excellent
00:44:15.240 president,
00:44:16.200 and he
00:44:16.540 had George
00:44:17.440 Bush,
00:44:17.840 who was
00:44:18.120 clearly not
00:44:18.980 as,
00:44:19.860 didn't have
00:44:21.160 the same
00:44:21.460 wattage as
00:44:22.300 Reagan.
00:44:23.640 But then
00:44:24.700 the second
00:44:25.520 in command,
00:44:27.400 Bush becomes
00:44:29.380 president,
00:44:30.140 largely because
00:44:30.860 Reagan was so
00:44:31.600 popular, really.
00:44:32.600 It was just an
00:44:33.140 extension of
00:44:33.700 Reagan.
00:44:34.920 Now Bush has
00:44:36.080 to find somebody
00:44:36.760 who's clearly
00:44:37.460 less capable
00:44:38.220 than he is.
00:44:39.760 So now we're
00:44:40.260 down two levels
00:44:41.060 from Reagan.
00:44:43.000 Right?
00:44:43.280 George Bush
00:44:45.540 Sr.
00:44:45.860 was a
00:44:46.220 solid
00:44:46.440 president.
00:44:47.280 In my
00:44:47.800 opinion, he
00:44:48.160 was pretty
00:44:48.480 solid.
00:44:50.160 But he had
00:44:50.940 to find
00:44:51.300 somebody who
00:44:51.760 was clearly
00:44:52.460 not as
00:44:53.100 solid as
00:44:53.580 him and
00:44:54.020 went all
00:44:54.440 the way
00:44:54.620 to Dan
00:44:54.960 Quayle.
00:44:55.560 Now if
00:44:56.060 somehow Dan
00:44:56.760 Quayle had
00:44:57.220 become
00:44:57.520 president,
00:44:58.960 who would
00:45:00.580 Dan Quayle
00:45:01.220 have picked
00:45:01.540 for his
00:45:01.860 vice
00:45:02.100 president?
00:45:04.400 I can
00:45:05.040 only think
00:45:05.480 of one
00:45:05.780 thing.
00:45:07.600 Young
00:45:07.960 Kamala
00:45:08.360 Harris.
00:45:09.440 Thank you.
00:45:10.960 Young
00:45:11.340 Kamala
00:45:11.700 Harris.
00:45:12.000 He was
00:45:12.320 probably
00:45:12.580 10 years
00:45:13.100 old or
00:45:13.460 something.
00:45:14.600 Yeah,
00:45:14.960 that was
00:45:15.280 the only
00:45:15.560 person who
00:45:16.000 would be
00:45:16.200 less capable
00:45:16.840 than Dan
00:45:17.680 Quayle.
00:45:18.980 All right,
00:45:19.720 I make fun
00:45:20.520 of Dan
00:45:20.860 Quayle,
00:45:21.180 but I
00:45:21.380 don't really
00:45:21.660 know anything
00:45:22.020 about him,
00:45:22.520 so he's
00:45:23.000 probably awesome
00:45:23.600 in his own
00:45:24.340 way.
00:45:25.680 All right,
00:45:27.060 and then
00:45:28.900 I saw a
00:45:30.120 compilation clip
00:45:31.000 of how many
00:45:31.480 times Kamala
00:45:32.140 Harris uses,
00:45:33.300 I guess it's
00:45:33.800 a Jesse
00:45:34.200 Jackson quote,
00:45:36.020 where she
00:45:36.660 goes,
00:45:37.540 and we
00:45:37.940 will get
00:45:38.360 this done
00:45:39.100 by looking
00:45:41.080 at what
00:45:41.500 can be
00:45:42.220 unburdened
00:45:43.820 by what
00:45:44.340 has been.
00:45:45.760 And apparently
00:45:46.280 she's said
00:45:46.840 this just
00:45:47.280 dozens and
00:45:48.000 dozens of
00:45:48.600 times.
00:45:49.280 She'll put it
00:45:49.820 in every
00:45:50.200 speech,
00:45:50.900 because it's
00:45:51.580 the only
00:45:51.840 thing she
00:45:52.240 says that
00:45:52.700 sounds smart.
00:45:54.820 Everything
00:45:55.220 else doesn't
00:45:55.860 sound smart,
00:45:57.080 but when she
00:45:57.580 says,
00:45:58.780 what can be
00:46:00.660 unburdened
00:46:01.960 by what
00:46:02.600 has been,
00:46:04.140 unburdened
00:46:05.000 by what
00:46:05.360 has been.
00:46:05.780 Well,
00:46:09.780 there's yet
00:46:10.420 another video
00:46:11.440 of her
00:46:11.820 looking
00:46:12.240 inebriated
00:46:13.120 in public.
00:46:15.280 We're still
00:46:15.940 not talking
00:46:16.540 about it,
00:46:16.980 right?
00:46:17.920 Like,
00:46:18.420 we can
00:46:18.680 only say
00:46:19.080 this on
00:46:19.560 weird little
00:46:20.480 podcasts,
00:46:22.180 but you
00:46:22.440 can't go on
00:46:23.340 the regular
00:46:23.760 news and
00:46:24.320 say,
00:46:24.620 well,
00:46:24.860 our drunken
00:46:25.340 vice
00:46:25.660 president
00:46:26.160 embarrassed
00:46:27.660 us again.
00:46:29.560 You can't
00:46:30.220 just say
00:46:30.560 the obvious,
00:46:31.240 that she's
00:46:31.720 clearly on
00:46:32.600 something.
00:46:33.700 You have
00:46:34.200 to ignore
00:46:34.560 that for
00:46:34.980 now.
00:46:35.640 So we're
00:46:36.080 all going
00:46:36.580 to pretend
00:46:36.980 that's not
00:46:37.480 happening,
00:46:37.900 right?
00:46:39.200 We're going
00:46:39.580 to pretend
00:46:40.020 that Biden's 0.95
00:46:40.920 brain is
00:46:41.560 just working
00:46:42.060 perfectly,
00:46:42.940 and his
00:46:43.920 VP is
00:46:44.780 totally
00:46:45.840 sober.
00:46:48.060 Yeah,
00:46:48.440 let's pretend
00:46:49.120 that's all
00:46:49.640 true.
00:46:51.360 She's
00:46:51.800 entertaining
00:46:52.200 anyway.
00:46:53.460 All right,
00:46:54.640 Joe Manchin
00:46:55.440 is making
00:46:56.620 some trouble
00:46:57.180 by, I
00:46:58.300 guess he's
00:46:58.640 having an
00:46:59.040 event of
00:46:59.520 these,
00:47:00.100 quote,
00:47:00.220 no labels
00:47:00.880 group.
00:47:01.500 It's a
00:47:01.820 potential
00:47:02.620 third-party
00:47:03.500 group.
00:47:04.880 So he
00:47:05.500 must be
00:47:05.900 flirting
00:47:06.220 with a
00:47:06.840 third-party
00:47:07.480 run,
00:47:08.440 which
00:47:09.160 everybody
00:47:09.920 believes
00:47:10.460 would do
00:47:10.880 nothing
00:47:11.220 but make
00:47:14.400 Trump the
00:47:14.860 president.
00:47:15.620 Am I
00:47:16.000 right?
00:47:17.860 Is that
00:47:18.420 the way
00:47:18.640 it would
00:47:18.820 go?
00:47:19.060 If Joe
00:47:19.460 Manchin
00:47:19.800 ran as
00:47:20.240 a third
00:47:20.580 party,
00:47:21.040 he would
00:47:21.220 make
00:47:21.440 Trump
00:47:21.720 president
00:47:22.160 pretty much
00:47:22.780 for sure,
00:47:23.660 assuming he
00:47:24.140 gets the
00:47:24.440 nomination.
00:47:27.560 So why
00:47:28.500 would he
00:47:28.820 do that?
00:47:30.540 I'm trying
00:47:31.160 to figure
00:47:32.020 out his
00:47:32.380 play.
00:47:32.660 Now it
00:47:33.820 totally makes
00:47:35.000 sense that
00:47:36.160 because he's
00:47:36.760 a swing
00:47:37.340 vote sometimes
00:47:38.220 that he
00:47:39.400 uses his
00:47:40.080 power to
00:47:40.680 get legislation
00:47:41.620 massaged
00:47:43.680 for his
00:47:44.080 benefit.
00:47:44.880 So that
00:47:45.180 makes sense
00:47:45.800 because he
00:47:46.680 uses his
00:47:47.360 swing vote
00:47:48.240 power.
00:47:49.140 But what
00:47:49.700 new power
00:47:50.980 would he
00:47:51.440 gain by
00:47:52.860 being a
00:47:53.320 third-party
00:47:53.840 candidate?
00:47:55.240 I feel like
00:47:56.060 unless he
00:47:57.180 believes he
00:47:57.680 can't win
00:47:58.120 his seat
00:47:58.520 back,
00:47:58.880 does he
00:47:59.860 think he's
00:48:00.220 not going
00:48:00.500 to win
00:48:00.720 his seat
00:48:01.040 back?
00:48:01.520 Because
00:48:01.800 there's
00:48:02.260 some talk
00:48:02.860 about that,
00:48:03.360 right?
00:48:05.140 So the
00:48:05.740 real problem
00:48:06.240 is he
00:48:06.560 doesn't think
00:48:07.060 he'll get
00:48:07.380 re-elected to
00:48:08.080 his current
00:48:08.520 position,
00:48:09.040 right?
00:48:09.640 So he
00:48:10.020 might need
00:48:10.400 an escape
00:48:10.880 path?
00:48:12.020 Because that
00:48:12.380 would make
00:48:12.640 sense.
00:48:13.180 Because that
00:48:13.540 would give
00:48:13.840 him something
00:48:15.220 that's not
00:48:15.740 just losing.
00:48:16.840 You know,
00:48:17.000 he'd be able
00:48:17.560 to go to
00:48:18.060 something.
00:48:19.300 But I
00:48:21.360 can't see
00:48:22.460 him thinking
00:48:23.640 that the
00:48:24.120 country would
00:48:24.780 be better
00:48:25.200 off as he
00:48:27.000 sees it.
00:48:27.580 because
00:48:28.360 basically he
00:48:29.260 would just
00:48:29.580 determine who
00:48:30.140 wins the
00:48:30.500 election,
00:48:31.480 which is
00:48:31.960 kind of
00:48:32.260 cool.
00:48:32.920 I love
00:48:33.340 the fact
00:48:33.680 that Joe
00:48:34.040 Manchin is
00:48:34.580 smart enough
00:48:35.220 that he
00:48:36.140 puts himself
00:48:36.740 in these
00:48:37.100 situations
00:48:37.600 where he's
00:48:38.120 the most
00:48:38.380 powerful
00:48:38.780 person.
00:48:39.720 It's totally
00:48:40.380 free money.
00:48:41.120 He just
00:48:41.380 keeps picking
00:48:41.920 it up.
00:48:43.060 So maybe
00:48:43.600 I'll just
00:48:46.580 put this
00:48:46.980 out there.
00:48:48.300 Imagine
00:48:48.780 Joe Manchin
00:48:49.460 got really,
00:48:50.340 really close
00:48:50.980 to launching
00:48:51.580 a third
00:48:52.020 party.
00:48:54.140 And then
00:48:54.800 there were a
00:48:55.180 bunch of
00:48:55.520 billionaires who
00:48:56.820 were Democrats
00:48:57.500 who know
00:48:58.660 that if
00:48:59.160 that happens
00:48:59.760 all the
00:49:00.240 money that
00:49:00.640 they've
00:49:00.900 donated to
00:49:01.760 Biden will
00:49:02.640 be wasted.
00:49:04.140 Total waste
00:49:04.720 of money.
00:49:05.940 Because Manchin
00:49:06.800 would determine
00:49:07.400 the outcome
00:49:07.860 just by running.
00:49:09.520 So the
00:49:09.940 billionaires on
00:49:10.640 the left
00:49:11.260 would find out
00:49:11.960 they were
00:49:12.240 wasting all
00:49:12.820 their money.
00:49:13.780 How much
00:49:14.280 money would
00:49:14.860 they be
00:49:15.200 willing to
00:49:15.720 give Joe
00:49:16.480 Manchin or
00:49:17.500 promise to
00:49:18.220 give him at
00:49:18.720 some time in
00:49:19.240 the future to
00:49:20.720 talk about it
00:49:21.380 being a third
00:49:21.920 party candidate?
00:49:24.160 A billion
00:49:24.940 dollars?
00:49:26.520 A hundred
00:49:26.980 million?
00:49:27.500 You don't
00:49:29.400 think it
00:49:29.960 would make
00:49:30.320 sense for
00:49:31.320 the big
00:49:32.080 billionaires on
00:49:32.980 the left to
00:49:34.100 bribe him out
00:49:34.960 of that job?
00:49:36.920 Maybe not in a
00:49:37.820 way that you and
00:49:38.360 I can tell as a
00:49:39.120 bribe, but maybe
00:49:40.740 down the road he's
00:49:42.100 running a company
00:49:42.980 that got funded by
00:49:44.760 some big Democrat
00:49:46.280 donor.
00:49:47.660 And, you know,
00:49:48.320 there's no,
00:49:49.520 nobody ever finds
00:49:50.520 there was any
00:49:51.060 documentation
00:49:51.760 connecting him.
00:49:52.880 It's just the
00:49:54.040 donor thought,
00:49:54.800 you know,
00:49:55.000 this Joe Manchin
00:49:55.800 guy, he could
00:49:56.360 run a business.
00:49:57.120 I think I'll
00:49:57.960 put some money
00:49:58.440 behind it.
00:50:00.700 He's 75 years
00:50:01.800 old, so I guess
00:50:02.320 he's not going to
00:50:02.960 run a business.
00:50:05.300 But anyway, I'm
00:50:06.080 just trying to
00:50:06.500 figure out how
00:50:07.060 does Joe Manchin
00:50:07.780 win by even
00:50:09.900 flirting with a
00:50:10.700 third party?
00:50:11.300 It's got to be
00:50:11.820 that he's playing
00:50:12.500 for the being
00:50:14.460 paid not to do
00:50:15.360 it.
00:50:16.060 What do you
00:50:16.420 think?
00:50:17.380 Follow the money
00:50:18.200 suggests that he
00:50:19.800 cannot make money
00:50:20.800 by running as a
00:50:22.400 third party.
00:50:22.880 So if you
00:50:24.240 follow the money
00:50:24.840 you'd have to
00:50:25.340 say he's
00:50:25.780 playing to
00:50:27.360 get bought
00:50:27.820 out.
00:50:30.180 That's what it
00:50:30.800 looks like.
00:50:31.660 It looks like
00:50:32.200 he's playing to
00:50:33.280 be bought
00:50:33.660 out.
00:50:34.740 We'll see.
00:50:37.600 The Babylon 0.80
00:50:38.400 Bee, of course,
00:50:39.320 the most important
00:50:40.300 media organization
00:50:41.460 in the world,
00:50:43.160 has a headline
00:50:44.000 says,
00:50:44.320 scientists warn
00:50:45.100 that within six
00:50:45.900 months humanity
00:50:47.180 will run out of
00:50:48.100 things to call
00:50:48.680 racist.
00:50:50.220 Well, what are
00:50:50.880 we going to do
00:50:51.320 then?
00:50:51.540 What will we
00:50:53.220 do then?
00:50:57.100 Justin Trudeau
00:50:58.240 is blaming
00:50:58.980 America's right
00:51:00.860 wing for the
00:51:02.360 fact that
00:51:02.920 Muslims in
00:51:03.820 Canada are
00:51:04.500 opposed to
00:51:05.060 LGBTQ
00:51:05.720 curriculums in
00:51:07.100 schools.
00:51:10.900 He's blaming
00:51:12.560 right wing
00:51:13.160 Americans for
00:51:14.960 Canadian
00:51:15.500 Muslims.
00:51:18.700 Because
00:51:18.980 Trudeau,
00:51:21.540 Trudeau managed
00:51:22.720 to find a
00:51:23.340 topic that's
00:51:24.620 so outrageously 1.00
00:51:25.680 stupid that 1.00
00:51:27.380 he made the 1.00
00:51:28.880 Muslims in
00:51:30.180 Canada and
00:51:30.800 the right wing
00:51:31.380 in America
00:51:31.960 join hands and
00:51:33.560 sing Kumbaya
00:51:34.280 and say,
00:51:35.380 all right,
00:51:35.620 we're on the
00:51:36.300 same team here.
00:51:37.680 We are on the
00:51:38.600 same team.
00:51:40.100 Come on over
00:51:40.580 here.
00:51:40.820 Ahmad,
00:51:41.400 Ahmad,
00:51:42.600 Ahmad, come over
00:51:43.500 here.
00:51:43.720 We're on the
00:51:44.080 same team.
00:51:44.480 just for
00:51:46.060 now.
00:51:47.200 Maybe later
00:51:48.060 we'll disagree.
00:51:49.480 But for
00:51:49.920 now, you
00:51:51.480 and I,
00:51:52.120 same team.
00:51:54.000 And Trudeau
00:51:55.000 is on the
00:51:55.340 other team.
00:51:56.340 But I love
00:51:57.040 the fact that
00:51:57.700 Elon Musk
00:51:58.380 weighed in on
00:51:59.220 a tweet about
00:52:00.240 Trudeau,
00:52:00.920 this story,
00:52:02.020 with just a
00:52:02.700 clown emoji.
00:52:03.420 the richest 0.97
00:52:05.760 man in the
00:52:06.320 world,
00:52:06.680 owner of
00:52:07.140 Twitter and
00:52:08.440 Tesla and
00:52:09.000 SpaceX.
00:52:09.960 He responds
00:52:10.620 to the
00:52:11.200 leader of
00:52:11.640 Canada with 0.97
00:52:12.100 a clown emoji. 0.67
00:52:13.660 And by the
00:52:14.000 way, there's
00:52:14.360 nothing else
00:52:14.820 you could say.
00:52:16.660 To imagine
00:52:17.480 that you could
00:52:18.000 have some
00:52:18.320 logical conversation
00:52:19.580 on this point,
00:52:21.200 there's no
00:52:21.620 logical conversation
00:52:22.800 on that point.
00:52:24.060 This is just
00:52:24.940 Trudeau being a 0.90
00:52:25.680 racist. 0.94
00:52:27.600 It's just
00:52:28.160 Trudeau being a 0.96
00:52:28.820 racist.
00:52:29.900 So you don't
00:52:31.000 enter their
00:52:31.600 frame.
00:52:32.660 Do not
00:52:33.200 enter the
00:52:33.660 frame.
00:52:34.040 Do what
00:52:34.320 Musk did.
00:52:35.600 Call it
00:52:36.020 out as 0.96
00:52:36.520 clown world. 0.99
00:52:38.300 Walk away. 0.99
00:52:39.780 Just don't
00:52:40.320 enter the
00:52:40.740 frame.
00:52:42.600 All right.
00:52:43.780 How many
00:52:44.420 of you would
00:52:45.040 agree with
00:52:45.960 the statement
00:52:46.420 that Vivek
00:52:47.460 Ramaswamy seems 0.86
00:52:48.560 to be rising
00:52:49.460 and like
00:52:52.240 something's
00:52:52.640 happening?
00:52:53.700 You see it,
00:52:54.280 right?
00:52:55.460 So the
00:52:56.400 TPUSCA
00:52:57.840 event,
00:52:59.200 big conservative
00:53:00.300 event of
00:53:00.920 young people,
00:53:01.540 Vivek came
00:53:04.240 in second
00:53:04.680 in the
00:53:05.020 straw poll,
00:53:06.660 beating out
00:53:07.820 DeSantis.
00:53:08.900 Now, I
00:53:09.540 guess this
00:53:09.920 event is
00:53:10.480 hugely pro-Trump,
00:53:11.900 so Trump
00:53:12.280 got almost
00:53:12.980 all the
00:53:13.280 votes, but
00:53:13.800 what was
00:53:14.180 left,
00:53:15.260 notably,
00:53:16.800 DeSantis
00:53:17.140 wasn't
00:53:17.540 second.
00:53:19.140 So, and
00:53:21.180 I think I
00:53:21.960 saw
00:53:22.500 Kanakoa,
00:53:23.860 the great,
00:53:24.320 he ran a
00:53:24.800 poll on
00:53:25.340 Twitter, and
00:53:26.200 also Vivek
00:53:27.360 did well in
00:53:27.940 that.
00:53:29.060 So, and
00:53:30.420 also Vivek is
00:53:31.300 trending on
00:53:31.980 Twitter.
00:53:34.240 Did you see
00:53:34.800 which candidates
00:53:35.460 are trending
00:53:36.080 today?
00:53:36.720 Nobody else.
00:53:38.440 Our RFK
00:53:39.540 Jr. often
00:53:40.240 trends, but
00:53:40.880 lately it's
00:53:41.420 because people
00:53:43.560 are going
00:53:43.860 after him for
00:53:44.500 imagining he's
00:53:45.280 anti-Semitic. 1.00
00:53:46.820 The dumbest 1.00
00:53:47.800 thing. 1.00
00:53:49.340 Imagining the
00:53:50.000 RFK Jr.
00:53:50.840 is anti-Semitic.
00:53:52.240 That might be 1.00
00:53:52.720 the dumbest 1.00
00:53:53.500 assumption. 1.00
00:53:54.940 Like, you
00:53:55.160 don't even have
00:53:55.600 to look into
00:53:56.100 it.
00:53:56.300 You don't
00:53:57.400 have to do
00:53:57.780 any research
00:53:58.600 to find out
00:54:00.160 that's obviously
00:54:00.980 not true.
00:54:01.580 You don't
00:54:01.760 have to read
00:54:02.120 the story.
00:54:03.700 That was
00:54:04.420 just so
00:54:04.900 obviously
00:54:05.540 not true.
00:54:07.200 Don't even
00:54:07.720 bother looking
00:54:08.240 into it.
00:54:08.780 There's
00:54:08.940 nothing to
00:54:09.360 see.
00:54:12.540 But I
00:54:13.360 think a lot
00:54:13.960 of people are
00:54:14.560 coming around
00:54:15.320 to the
00:54:15.740 thought that
00:54:18.600 Trump plus
00:54:19.640 Vivek, if
00:54:21.600 Vivek doesn't
00:54:22.320 win it outright,
00:54:23.180 which is still
00:54:23.680 possible, because
00:54:24.800 anything can
00:54:25.340 happen with
00:54:25.800 Trump, right?
00:54:26.760 The most
00:54:27.440 predictable thing
00:54:28.280 about Trump is
00:54:28.980 that he's
00:54:29.340 unpredictable.
00:54:30.860 So who
00:54:31.260 knows?
00:54:32.280 Who knows?
00:54:33.000 Maybe the
00:54:33.380 legal system
00:54:34.040 takes him
00:54:34.460 out.
00:54:35.360 Maybe he
00:54:35.780 says something
00:54:36.300 that's just
00:54:36.900 too far this
00:54:37.700 time.
00:54:38.480 So it
00:54:38.860 makes sense
00:54:39.280 for Vivek to
00:54:40.060 be rising and
00:54:41.720 also popular
00:54:42.540 with Trump.
00:54:43.360 Trump actually
00:54:44.000 says he's
00:54:44.360 doing a great
00:54:44.800 job and he's
00:54:45.580 competing with
00:54:46.140 him.
00:54:46.440 That's pretty
00:54:46.840 amazing.
00:54:47.820 So it does
00:54:48.600 seem that
00:54:49.000 they're at
00:54:49.360 least considering
00:54:51.080 what might
00:54:52.640 happen if
00:54:53.160 Trump got the
00:54:53.800 nomination.
00:54:54.240 I think
00:54:55.320 they're thinking
00:54:55.860 about it.
00:54:57.400 And in my
00:54:57.960 opinion, and
00:54:58.520 I heard this
00:54:58.960 from somebody
00:54:59.860 else, so I'm
00:55:00.500 stealing this
00:55:01.020 idea, Vivek
00:55:02.500 would be the
00:55:03.360 perfect COO to 0.78
00:55:05.100 Trump's CEO.
00:55:07.880 Wouldn't it be
00:55:08.680 great to have
00:55:09.500 somebody who is
00:55:10.160 just a great
00:55:10.720 operator, who
00:55:12.600 would just be
00:55:13.100 the sane,
00:55:13.880 logical, knows
00:55:15.340 how to look at
00:55:16.580 risk and reward,
00:55:18.160 knows how to
00:55:18.660 implement, knows
00:55:19.460 how to execute,
00:55:20.160 and then you
00:55:21.920 season Vivek
00:55:25.400 for the
00:55:27.200 presidency later.
00:55:29.280 So I've
00:55:30.160 only had a
00:55:31.140 million users
00:55:31.800 on Twitter
00:55:32.780 now for one
00:55:33.920 day, but as
00:55:35.500 I told you, I'd
00:55:36.120 be running
00:55:36.500 things once I
00:55:37.460 got to a
00:55:37.820 million, because
00:55:39.020 power is
00:55:39.660 really an
00:55:40.340 influence times
00:55:41.480 platform.
00:55:44.360 Let me say
00:55:45.140 that again.
00:55:46.240 The amount
00:55:46.500 of power or
00:55:47.520 influence anybody
00:55:48.240 has is how
00:55:49.820 much skill
00:55:50.340 they have
00:55:50.900 in influence
00:55:52.060 multiplied times
00:55:53.860 how many
00:55:54.280 people see
00:55:54.880 it, the
00:55:55.900 size of your
00:55:56.340 platform or
00:55:57.200 your audience.
00:55:58.940 So with a
00:55:59.680 million people
00:56:00.320 who are
00:56:01.800 connected to
00:56:02.600 millions of
00:56:03.420 other people,
00:56:05.060 in theory,
00:56:06.800 my training
00:56:08.240 in persuasion
00:56:09.120 times a
00:56:10.560 million people
00:56:11.240 should allow
00:56:12.180 me to run
00:56:12.600 the world
00:56:12.920 now, from
00:56:14.740 behind the
00:56:15.280 scenes.
00:56:15.940 Nobody will
00:56:16.340 even know.
00:56:17.160 But I've
00:56:17.580 only been in
00:56:18.020 charge in one
00:56:18.640 day, and
00:56:19.040 already it
00:56:19.500 looks like
00:56:19.860 you can
00:56:20.140 see the
00:56:20.460 next 12
00:56:21.920 years pretty
00:56:22.520 clearly.
00:56:23.860 It looks like
00:56:24.580 Trump's going
00:56:25.060 to get the
00:56:25.400 nomination,
00:56:26.100 Vivek will
00:56:26.600 be vice
00:56:27.020 president, and
00:56:28.140 then Vivek
00:56:28.700 will take
00:56:29.080 over after
00:56:29.700 having a
00:56:30.260 tremendous
00:56:30.680 run for
00:56:32.060 president for
00:56:33.000 eight years
00:56:33.640 after that.
00:56:35.060 And so I
00:56:35.780 don't know if
00:56:36.100 you saw this,
00:56:36.740 but it was
00:56:37.500 like looking
00:56:37.980 into this
00:56:38.560 cloudy, foggy
00:56:40.480 forest, and
00:56:42.360 as soon as
00:56:42.920 Trump said
00:56:43.620 that maybe
00:56:45.120 DeSantis
00:56:45.600 wouldn't be
00:56:46.220 the second
00:56:46.700 place, maybe
00:56:47.960 Vivek, he's
00:56:49.320 doing a
00:56:49.640 great job, as
00:56:51.340 soon as
00:56:51.860 Trump said
00:56:52.380 that, you
00:56:53.200 could feel
00:56:53.520 the fog
00:56:53.960 just went
00:56:54.360 away.
00:56:55.380 And the
00:56:55.700 trees just
00:56:56.200 like opened
00:56:58.000 up, and
00:56:58.780 you could see
00:56:59.200 12 years
00:56:59.840 ahead.
00:57:01.600 Did anybody
00:57:02.080 else have
00:57:02.420 that experience?
00:57:03.700 Where the
00:57:04.400 moment you
00:57:04.860 heard Trump
00:57:05.520 say something
00:57:06.100 positive about
00:57:06.960 Vivek, you
00:57:08.500 could see 12
00:57:09.300 years ahead.
00:57:11.920 That's what it
00:57:12.660 felt like.
00:57:13.160 I've only
00:57:14.240 had this
00:57:14.680 feeling once,
00:57:17.160 2015.
00:57:19.540 That was the
00:57:20.240 only time I
00:57:20.840 thought, oh
00:57:21.560 my God, I'm
00:57:22.080 not predicting
00:57:22.680 the future, I'm
00:57:23.300 actually looking
00:57:23.820 at it.
00:57:24.980 So when I
00:57:26.100 made my
00:57:26.600 famous call
00:57:27.440 that Trump
00:57:27.820 would win
00:57:28.160 in 2016,
00:57:30.100 internally it
00:57:31.260 did not feel
00:57:31.880 like a
00:57:32.200 prediction, and
00:57:33.400 I've never
00:57:33.740 had that
00:57:34.080 experience before.
00:57:35.840 It felt like
00:57:36.580 I was looking
00:57:37.200 at it, and
00:57:39.020 that just
00:57:39.520 happened again.
00:57:40.460 I did not
00:57:41.120 have that
00:57:41.520 experience in
00:57:42.420 the last
00:57:42.820 election.
00:57:43.920 In the last
00:57:44.540 election I
00:57:45.040 was making
00:57:45.420 sort of a
00:57:46.380 pundit
00:57:46.900 prediction based
00:57:48.200 on the facts,
00:57:49.380 you know, as
00:57:50.840 best I could.
00:57:52.040 And it was
00:57:52.440 wrong.
00:57:53.340 It was
00:57:53.580 wrong.
00:57:54.500 But I
00:57:55.820 swear as
00:57:56.500 soon as
00:57:57.260 Trump gave
00:57:59.040 Vivek that
00:57:59.880 little bit of
00:58:00.460 positive words,
00:58:03.620 12 years,
00:58:05.580 you could see
00:58:05.980 it.
00:58:06.740 You could see
00:58:07.220 all 12
00:58:07.900 years.
00:58:09.780 Now you
00:58:10.520 say, but 1.00
00:58:10.980 unless the
00:58:11.380 elections are
00:58:11.920 rigged.
00:58:12.420 Maybe.
00:58:14.540 And of
00:58:14.900 course, this
00:58:16.320 all depends
00:58:16.920 on Trump
00:58:17.820 not getting
00:58:19.260 himself in
00:58:19.820 any new
00:58:20.160 trouble, and
00:58:21.200 that the
00:58:21.500 trouble that's
00:58:22.360 already coming
00:58:22.880 at him doesn't
00:58:23.700 take him out.
00:58:24.500 So those are
00:58:24.980 big ifs.
00:58:25.940 Those are
00:58:26.220 really big ifs.
00:58:27.300 But I'll tell
00:58:27.820 you, it doesn't
00:58:28.920 feel like a
00:58:29.440 prediction anymore.
00:58:30.960 It feels like I
00:58:31.920 can see it.
00:58:33.440 That's only
00:58:33.960 happened once
00:58:34.540 before.
00:58:35.440 So we'll see
00:58:35.980 if it means
00:58:36.340 anything.
00:58:38.460 All right, I
00:58:39.180 thought this was
00:58:39.700 funny.
00:58:40.020 There was a
00:58:41.320 woman who 0.99
00:58:41.720 tweeted, name
00:58:42.900 is Chandler
00:58:43.900 Remington.
00:58:45.000 Chandler.
00:58:45.600 Chandler
00:58:46.140 Remington, which
00:58:47.440 is one of the
00:58:48.020 all-time best
00:58:48.840 names.
00:58:50.360 Chandler
00:58:50.940 Remington.
00:58:52.600 Oh my, come 0.83
00:58:53.240 on.
00:58:54.280 You know, you're
00:58:54.700 going to be
00:58:55.480 something with
00:58:56.140 that name,
00:58:56.600 right?
00:58:57.620 Like, you
00:58:58.160 never hear the
00:58:58.920 homeless shelter.
00:59:00.400 Who's in the
00:59:00.980 homeless shelter?
00:59:02.000 Well, Chandler
00:59:03.360 Remington just
00:59:04.140 came in.
00:59:05.020 No.
00:59:05.860 No, Chandler was
00:59:06.740 going to do
00:59:07.940 something.
00:59:08.280 Anyway, she
00:59:09.620 went to a, what
00:59:10.440 she calls a
00:59:10.940 feminist therapist
00:59:11.860 and says the
00:59:13.320 feminist therapist
00:59:14.340 did the
00:59:15.020 following.
00:59:16.180 Described a
00:59:16.920 man I had
00:59:17.440 been in a
00:59:17.920 relationship with
00:59:19.000 as predatory
00:59:19.920 when all of
00:59:21.180 our interactions
00:59:21.900 had been
00:59:22.360 consensual.
00:59:24.000 Two, blamed
00:59:25.020 the patriarchy
00:59:26.040 for problems
00:59:27.120 in my life
00:59:27.820 which stemmed
00:59:28.480 completely from
00:59:29.260 women. 0.81
00:59:32.480 And three,
00:59:33.840 made general
00:59:34.480 negative statements
00:59:35.300 about men,
00:59:36.400 portraying them
00:59:37.060 as liars or
00:59:37.940 deceptive for
00:59:38.660 no good reason.
00:59:40.160 So based on all
00:59:40.880 of the above,
00:59:41.500 I'm starting
00:59:41.840 therapy with a
00:59:42.620 new male
00:59:43.300 therapist on
00:59:44.300 Monday.
00:59:44.740 Wish me luck.
00:59:48.060 Yeah.
00:59:48.940 I would never
00:59:49.900 go to a
00:59:51.500 marriage therapist
00:59:52.680 if I were you.
00:59:53.720 Certainly wouldn't
00:59:54.380 go to a female 1.00
00:59:55.140 marriage therapist
00:59:56.000 for the same
00:59:56.620 reason.
00:59:57.680 Basically, this was
00:59:58.880 my same experience.
01:00:00.540 I had the same
01:00:01.120 experience.
01:00:02.300 Now, the
01:00:02.960 examples I didn't
01:00:03.800 have, so these
01:00:04.600 are different
01:00:04.980 examples.
01:00:05.380 But my
01:00:06.320 experience was,
01:00:07.960 oh my God,
01:00:08.780 this is somebody
01:00:09.400 who likes women 0.99
01:00:10.080 and hates men. 0.82
01:00:11.680 Like, right off
01:00:12.420 the bat, I
01:00:14.320 thought I got a
01:00:14.960 man-hater, and
01:00:16.340 it went that
01:00:16.880 way.
01:00:18.000 It really went
01:00:18.820 that way.
01:00:19.700 Now, that's my
01:00:20.500 subjective opinion,
01:00:21.680 right?
01:00:22.900 Subjectively.
01:00:23.980 But I was told
01:00:24.820 that I couldn't
01:00:25.440 have an objection
01:00:29.780 to how my mate
01:00:31.840 acted, but she
01:00:32.720 could have
01:00:33.080 objections to
01:00:33.780 how I acted.
01:00:36.160 And that was
01:00:36.880 the rule, and
01:00:37.920 if you tried to
01:00:38.640 break that rule, 0.84
01:00:39.580 then everything
01:00:40.160 stopped.
01:00:41.820 Only one person
01:00:42.840 could have
01:00:43.180 objections with
01:00:43.920 the other.
01:00:44.360 That was
01:00:44.800 actually the
01:00:45.280 rule.
01:00:47.440 Because if I
01:00:48.200 had objections,
01:00:48.880 I was trying
01:00:49.240 to change
01:00:49.720 her.
01:00:50.980 But if she
01:00:51.480 had objections,
01:00:52.300 it was because
01:00:52.700 I was being 1.00
01:00:53.140 an asshole. 1.00
01:00:55.260 That was 1.00
01:00:56.000 like, actually
01:00:56.660 my experience.
01:00:59.040 And how
01:01:00.180 would that
01:01:00.440 possibly work?
01:01:01.880 How, in what
01:01:02.620 world could that
01:01:03.300 work?
01:01:04.040 To like, make
01:01:04.980 you, anyway, so
01:01:07.080 I agreed with
01:01:07.500 her.
01:01:09.240 Elon Musk also
01:01:10.540 weighed in on
01:01:11.160 that, and he
01:01:12.000 said, friends are
01:01:12.900 far better than
01:01:13.500 therapy.
01:01:14.380 The incentive
01:01:14.960 structure is to
01:01:15.780 keep you hooked
01:01:16.400 and never cured.
01:01:17.760 That's basically
01:01:18.660 the whole problem
01:01:19.540 right there.
01:01:21.420 Therapists don't 0.95
01:01:22.380 want to fix you.
01:01:23.820 Because I often
01:01:24.580 thought, even
01:01:25.640 when I went to
01:01:26.500 therapy, I
01:01:27.060 thought, this
01:01:28.660 could get fixed
01:01:29.320 in like two
01:01:30.160 sentences.
01:01:30.740 Right?
01:01:32.380 This could get
01:01:32.940 fixed in two
01:01:33.640 sentences.
01:01:34.720 You just find
01:01:35.580 the problem and
01:01:36.480 tell us what to
01:01:37.080 do differently, and
01:01:37.920 we'll go do
01:01:38.360 that, about
01:01:38.920 what we'll be
01:01:39.280 fine.
01:01:40.280 Could not
01:01:40.740 find the
01:01:42.100 problem.
01:01:42.960 Just kept
01:01:43.400 looking.
01:01:45.000 Except the
01:01:45.480 problem is
01:01:45.880 something about
01:01:46.360 me, I
01:01:46.740 guess.
01:01:48.840 Yeah, it's
01:01:49.660 follow the
01:01:50.380 money here.
01:01:50.980 You're not
01:01:51.260 going to get
01:01:51.800 any cures from
01:01:52.940 people who
01:01:53.320 are charged
01:01:53.620 by the
01:01:53.880 hour.
01:01:57.240 And then
01:01:57.580 Musk went
01:01:58.080 on, he
01:01:58.340 said, be
01:01:58.640 especially wary
01:01:59.420 of therapists
01:02:00.100 in expensive
01:02:01.200 neighborhoods.
01:02:02.400 Their true
01:02:02.820 loyalty is to
01:02:03.740 their landlord,
01:02:04.620 not you.
01:02:05.960 That's so
01:02:06.600 brutal.
01:02:07.480 Their loyalty
01:02:08.040 is to their
01:02:08.580 landlord.
01:02:10.680 Completely
01:02:11.240 true.
01:02:12.780 All right.
01:02:15.060 There's a
01:02:15.700 report that
01:02:16.360 Tucker Carlson's
01:02:17.640 going to, you've
01:02:18.720 already heard,
01:02:19.320 might do his
01:02:20.080 show on
01:02:21.460 Twitter exclusively,
01:02:22.880 I guess.
01:02:23.900 But he's
01:02:24.740 reportedly also
01:02:25.840 got a big
01:02:26.620 sponsor for that
01:02:27.680 called Public
01:02:28.820 Square.
01:02:29.240 and they're
01:02:30.560 a conservative
01:02:31.220 friendly shopping
01:02:32.140 app.
01:02:32.960 So they're a
01:02:33.420 shopping app that
01:02:34.480 shows you
01:02:35.140 products from
01:02:35.900 non-ESG
01:02:37.560 companies.
01:02:40.220 I think I'm
01:02:41.180 going to use
01:02:41.540 this.
01:02:43.260 Good enough.
01:02:45.340 You had me
01:02:46.120 at non-ESG
01:02:49.780 shopping apps.
01:02:51.060 Now, I
01:02:54.100 don't think
01:02:54.640 necessarily this
01:02:56.540 one app is
01:02:57.140 going to make a
01:02:57.640 difference, but
01:02:58.500 it's more to
01:02:59.120 the point that
01:02:59.820 ESG is now a
01:03:00.980 dead man
01:03:01.560 walking.
01:03:02.440 I mean, it's
01:03:02.680 just embarrassing
01:03:03.280 if you're still
01:03:03.960 in favor of it
01:03:04.560 at this point.
01:03:07.120 China's economy
01:03:07.880 is not bouncing
01:03:08.700 back after the
01:03:09.800 lockdown, and
01:03:13.000 people are
01:03:13.440 wondering, why?
01:03:14.240 Why?
01:03:14.760 Why are they not
01:03:15.540 bouncing back?
01:03:16.280 Why is the
01:03:16.680 economy lagging?
01:03:18.700 Well, it's
01:03:19.020 because they
01:03:19.340 pissed me off, 0.62
01:03:20.240 obviously.
01:03:21.160 There might be
01:03:21.740 other reasons,
01:03:22.320 but that's the
01:03:22.700 main one.
01:03:23.020 In Ukraine,
01:03:25.400 there was a
01:03:25.980 main bridge,
01:03:27.820 I guess,
01:03:28.140 to Crimea,
01:03:29.440 the main
01:03:30.520 bridge that
01:03:31.260 Russia used
01:03:33.500 to supply
01:03:34.520 Crimea,
01:03:36.420 and apparently
01:03:38.020 there was a
01:03:38.760 submarine drone
01:03:40.380 attack, so a
01:03:41.720 submarine that
01:03:42.340 was operated
01:03:42.900 remotely.
01:03:44.400 There were two
01:03:45.000 of them, and
01:03:45.440 they went in
01:03:45.860 there and did
01:03:47.500 some stuff and
01:03:48.160 blew up part of
01:03:48.860 the bridge,
01:03:49.180 bridge, but 0.62
01:03:49.740 it didn't blow
01:03:51.120 up the railroad
01:03:52.780 part of the
01:03:53.440 bridge.
01:03:54.420 So the bridge
01:03:54.980 had a car
01:03:56.320 part and a
01:03:57.260 railroad part,
01:03:58.380 and it blew
01:03:58.880 up the car
01:03:59.360 part that
01:03:59.820 didn't make
01:04:00.160 much difference,
01:04:01.100 and it left
01:04:01.620 the rail part
01:04:02.540 intact.
01:04:04.200 And here's my
01:04:05.140 question.
01:04:06.460 How in the
01:04:07.120 world are
01:04:08.000 railroads still
01:04:09.720 operating anywhere
01:04:10.900 near a war
01:04:12.440 zone?
01:04:14.860 A railroad?
01:04:17.640 How in the
01:04:18.440 world?
01:04:19.180 Can you not
01:04:20.240 take out
01:04:20.700 railroads?
01:04:22.520 I would think
01:04:23.340 that would be
01:04:23.740 the single
01:04:24.400 easiest thing
01:04:25.220 you could do.
01:04:26.400 I can't even
01:04:26.940 imagine anything
01:04:27.580 easier than
01:04:28.100 taking out a
01:04:28.660 railroad, because
01:04:29.600 railroads would
01:04:30.260 have massive
01:04:31.560 lengths of
01:04:32.660 track that
01:04:34.500 nobody's watching.
01:04:37.320 Can't one
01:04:37.940 person take
01:04:38.600 out a railroad?
01:04:41.540 Just, you
01:04:42.220 know, just
01:04:42.520 ruin the tracks
01:04:43.320 a little bit
01:04:43.840 in one area?
01:04:45.280 I don't, every
01:04:46.660 once in a while
01:04:47.200 I just don't
01:04:47.740 understand.
01:04:48.160 I also don't
01:04:49.680 understand why
01:04:50.600 Islamic terror 0.96
01:04:52.480 attacks have
01:04:53.760 largely stopped
01:04:54.700 in the United
01:04:55.280 States.
01:04:57.040 How is that
01:04:57.800 even possible?
01:04:59.500 Unless they
01:05:00.600 have so much,
01:05:01.860 unless our
01:05:02.260 government has
01:05:02.740 so much control
01:05:03.480 of our
01:05:03.840 communications that
01:05:05.320 just nobody can
01:05:06.040 put together a
01:05:06.720 scheme.
01:05:08.600 But how in the
01:05:09.840 world are there
01:05:10.980 still railroads in
01:05:12.380 Ukraine or any
01:05:13.900 part of Russia
01:05:14.500 that's close to
01:05:15.340 Ukraine?
01:05:15.740 I don't
01:05:16.480 understand it.
01:05:18.700 Anyway, all
01:05:19.540 those bombs that
01:05:20.280 nobody could take
01:05:20.860 out of railroad,
01:05:21.720 the main thing
01:05:22.900 that delivers
01:05:23.500 ammunition.
01:05:25.260 So the primary
01:05:25.980 thing that delivers
01:05:26.820 ammunition, and
01:05:27.700 they're still
01:05:28.180 operating.
01:05:30.180 What's going on?
01:05:33.160 All right.
01:05:35.180 I think that's
01:05:38.880 all I got.
01:05:39.400 that's all I
01:05:41.280 needed, because
01:05:42.200 it was the best
01:05:42.840 live stream you've
01:05:43.900 ever seen today.
01:05:46.080 And maybe tomorrow
01:05:46.960 will be even
01:05:47.440 better.
01:05:48.920 So let's go
01:05:51.020 continue being
01:05:51.880 awesome.
01:05:52.360 And I think
01:05:53.620 everything's starting
01:05:54.360 to look good.
01:05:58.340 Maybe the golden
01:05:59.300 age?
01:06:00.480 Too soon?
01:06:02.180 Yeah, Andrew
01:06:02.780 Tate's getting
01:06:03.400 some heavy
01:06:04.700 pushback on
01:06:05.520 social media,
01:06:06.320 if you haven't
01:06:06.860 seen it.
01:06:08.240 So if you're
01:06:10.340 watching that
01:06:10.780 story, I'd
01:06:11.340 recommend
01:06:11.780 watching both
01:06:13.740 sides.
01:06:15.340 You should hear
01:06:15.800 what Andrew
01:06:16.620 Tate says,
01:06:18.080 but you should
01:06:18.520 hear what
01:06:18.860 detractors say.
01:06:21.320 Because what
01:06:21.920 detractors say is
01:06:23.420 primarily video
01:06:25.880 and audio of
01:06:26.940 Andrew Tate in
01:06:27.880 his own voice.
01:06:29.460 So you want to
01:06:30.480 hear him saying
01:06:31.100 he's going to do
01:06:31.860 exactly the
01:06:32.640 lover boy thing,
01:06:33.500 and he's been
01:06:33.980 doing a lot of
01:06:34.640 it, and then
01:06:36.940 defending that
01:06:38.180 he's doing it,
01:06:39.020 saying that he
01:06:39.520 didn't do it.
01:06:40.720 So he's on
01:06:41.400 video saying that
01:06:42.920 he was doing it
01:06:43.540 massively, and
01:06:44.400 also that all
01:06:46.080 it is is that
01:06:46.800 he was being
01:06:47.200 nice to women,
01:06:47.920 and they like
01:06:48.920 to work webcams.
01:06:51.440 So you decide.
01:06:53.420 You be the
01:06:54.040 decision maker.
01:06:55.640 I don't know if
01:06:56.340 what he did was
01:06:58.000 illegal anywhere
01:06:59.460 except Romania.
01:07:01.260 So Romania has 0.65
01:07:02.140 a specific law
01:07:03.200 where the
01:07:04.320 Romanians can
01:07:05.160 tell you that
01:07:05.740 the women were 1.00
01:07:06.340 victims even if
01:07:07.180 the women say
01:07:07.780 they were not.
01:07:08.980 So that's a
01:07:09.380 weird law.
01:07:10.640 So if I had to
01:07:11.980 bet, I'm going
01:07:13.060 to bet he gets
01:07:15.460 out of his legal
01:07:16.240 troubles.
01:07:17.880 Unless it's
01:07:18.580 rigged.
01:07:19.480 And it might
01:07:19.980 be.
01:07:20.620 There's a good
01:07:21.180 50% chance of
01:07:22.320 that, I would
01:07:22.740 think.
01:07:23.780 But I think
01:07:24.660 he would be
01:07:25.380 able to
01:07:25.680 persuade his
01:07:26.320 way out just
01:07:26.880 because he's
01:07:27.240 a good
01:07:27.480 persuader.
01:07:29.520 Regardless of
01:07:30.160 whether the
01:07:30.840 law was
01:07:31.240 technically broken
01:07:32.060 or not.
01:07:32.880 I think he's
01:07:33.880 going to get
01:07:34.200 out of it.
01:07:34.940 Now, does
01:07:35.300 Romania have 0.92
01:07:36.000 the equivalent
01:07:37.480 of a Supreme
01:07:38.220 Court?
01:07:40.540 Who can tell
01:07:41.320 me?
01:07:42.080 Do they have
01:07:42.500 the equivalent
01:07:43.080 of an appeals
01:07:44.100 court?
01:07:44.460 Because if they
01:07:47.640 do, that's
01:07:48.040 probably where
01:07:48.480 it ends up.
01:07:49.000 I don't
01:07:51.600 imagine the
01:07:52.400 regular court
01:07:53.340 would necessarily
01:07:54.400 make the right
01:07:54.980 decision, but
01:07:55.700 if there's
01:07:56.140 some kind of
01:07:56.560 appeals, I
01:07:57.900 would like his
01:07:58.700 chances in
01:07:59.280 appeals.
01:08:00.820 Scott, do
01:08:01.680 you have
01:08:01.960 rental property?
01:08:03.000 I do not.
01:08:04.260 I don't own
01:08:04.820 any rental
01:08:05.280 property.
01:08:08.020 I own my
01:08:09.180 house.
01:08:09.740 I have one
01:08:10.120 house, one
01:08:12.100 automobile, and
01:08:16.540 a lot of
01:08:17.080 index funds.
01:08:19.000 That's about
01:08:19.760 it.
01:08:22.240 That's pretty
01:08:22.960 much my entire
01:08:23.760 situation.
01:08:26.080 All right,
01:08:26.700 that's all we
01:08:27.920 need, and
01:08:28.940 two electric
01:08:30.240 bikes.
01:08:31.020 I do have
01:08:31.840 two electric
01:08:32.360 bikes, so I
01:08:33.500 splurged.
01:08:34.620 The first one
01:08:35.200 wasn't good.
01:08:36.220 I bought my
01:08:36.640 first one during
01:08:37.280 the height of
01:08:37.780 the pandemic,
01:08:38.900 and the
01:08:40.120 pandemic, all
01:08:41.560 the bikes were
01:08:42.220 purchased, so I
01:08:43.600 couldn't get what
01:08:44.280 I wanted.
01:08:45.320 I couldn't get
01:08:46.100 one that looked
01:08:46.800 cool, which is
01:08:48.100 half of owning
01:08:48.740 an e-bike, is
01:08:49.400 they look
01:08:49.720 cool.
01:08:50.580 I had to
01:08:51.220 get one that
01:08:51.640 looked really
01:08:52.460 kind of
01:08:53.560 conservative and
01:08:54.520 boring, so
01:08:55.740 immediately, as
01:08:56.660 soon as the
01:08:57.160 supply went up,
01:08:58.180 I got one that
01:08:59.620 looks cool.
01:09:01.320 So that's it
01:09:02.740 for me.
01:09:03.300 Bye, YouTube.
01:09:04.180 Thanks for
01:09:04.940 watching.