Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2176 Scott Adams： End Of Wokeness, Media Badness, Whistleblower Goodness, Lots Of Politics

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization and possibly

00:00:11.240 aliens. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and there's never been a better time. And we got news

00:00:17.460 for you, like news all over the place. You can be saturated with funny, absurd news. It's the best

00:00:23.280 kind. And if you'd like that experience, to go to levels that, well, people say can never be

00:00:29.680 matched. All you need is a cup or mug or a glass, a tank or gel, a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel

00:00:35.460 of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled

00:00:41.520 pleasure of the dopamine at the end of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called

00:00:44.520 the simultaneous sip-and-apps. Now, go.

00:00:48.200 Oh. Oh. Well, if you're on Twitter, you should know that I just, just, just now tweeted a clip

00:01:03.240 of me from my man cave explaining how to predict the future of the news using nothing but a Tim

00:01:10.960 Poole hat. Right. And your finger. You'll need a finger and a Tim Poole hat, and you too

00:01:18.320 can predict the future of the news. I just tweeted that if you want to see it. But don't

00:01:24.340 leave. Don't leave. Stay here now. Later, you can go look for that. All right. Apparently,

00:01:32.740 Mayor Jacob Frey or Frey in Minneapolis, he was telling the police to not arrest people

00:01:40.760 who have mushrooms. And I guess everybody is realizing that mushrooms are going to save

00:01:48.080 the world. You're going to fix all your mental illnesses and make you happy. So that's a little

00:01:54.700 sign of goodness. We're going to, we're going to ease into the hard news because we got some

00:02:00.300 hard news. And by hard, I mean funny, but it's still hard, hard and funny. Yeah. I've been

00:02:07.780 described that way, but that's another story. Don't, let's not talk about that. So what else

00:02:14.580 we got going on in Wall Street Journal, James McIntosh, an opinion piece says, well, is it

00:02:22.760 an opinion? I guess it's opinion, that China's lost decade for investors has already happened

00:02:28.080 and hopes for a post-pandemic reopening and a rapid economic recovery are looking bad. So

00:02:36.840 it turns out that investing in China is looking like a bad idea. You're welcome.

00:02:44.580 Well, you know that product that's competing with Twitter? It's called Threads. I don't know

00:02:52.660 if anybody has said this yet, but I'd like to be the first. You know that product Threads?

00:03:00.860 I think it's coming unraveled. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Yeah, it's coming

00:03:09.040 unraveled. I'm pretty sure somebody already said that, but I didn't say it yet.

00:03:14.580 So there's that. So I guess engagement is just tanking and it's looking terrible and

00:03:20.660 all the time spent, basically every metric is in the toilet, big time. Now, as I said

00:03:27.620 before, that doesn't really mean it's dead. That just means that the big launch was sort

00:03:34.000 of not typical of a launch. So they got a bunch of people, but they weren't really people

00:03:38.580 who are necessarily going to stick around. So you shouldn't be surprised if it got a big

00:03:44.420 bump and then went down 70% and then maybe it grows from there. Maybe. I mean, Zuckerberg

00:03:52.020 has the resources to keep it, you know, chunking away until it gets better. So we'll see.

00:03:57.320 Also in the Wall Street Journal, there's an article that says, some activities people

00:04:04.400 associate with happiness, you'll be surprised, but things people associate with happiness like

00:04:10.580 meditating, working out, and spending time in nature lack scientific evidence to prove they

00:04:17.860 lift your spirit. So all of the hundreds of millions of people who have found immediate improvement

00:04:27.060 in their moods from meditating, working out, and spending time in nature, I think you should

00:04:32.740 be a little less happy about it from now on. Because according to the Wall Street Journal,

00:04:37.700 you don't have the scientific backing for your happiness. So if you go for a run and then you

00:04:43.960 find that your mood is instantly improved, probably just an illusion. Get back to your scientific

00:04:50.180 roots and be skeptical. You probably are still angry. And if you meditate and you feel great

00:04:57.020 when you're done, it could be an illusion. It might be an illusion. Science needs to weigh

00:05:02.620 in. Are you really happier? Are you pretending that you're happier and you're just fooling

00:05:07.820 yourself? And then of course, walking in nature, you've all had the experience of walking in nature

00:05:15.460 and it just pisses you off. Am I right? You'll be in an average mood. You take a walk in nature,

00:05:21.240 you're like, ah, screw this nature, it's pissing me off, ah, and you'll be in a bad mood. So what I

00:05:26.920 think is we should take our limited money for science and we should put a lot of it into testing

00:05:34.120 the most obvious fucking things in the world, or you could just go for a run.

00:05:39.780 And you'll feel good. Promise. All right. Just to cause trouble, there's a new service. I don't

00:05:49.180 know where it is because I didn't care. But there's a new service that's advertising that

00:05:54.360 they'll provide you with handy workers, not handy men. No, no, no. No handy men. These are handy

00:06:02.580 workers and they advertise that they will all be female. Well, I think 90% of them will be female,

00:06:09.280 lesbian, and trans. So if you want handy workers or a female, lesbian, and trans only, you can call

00:06:19.560 this company whose name I don't know and I don't know where they're from. But good luck if you can

00:06:25.040 find them. I just have a few things to say about that. None of them are productive, if you know what

00:06:33.140 I mean. Now, I say this before I give you my joke portion of the story. I love the LGBTQ community.

00:06:43.420 There's no such thing as like, I was walking through an LGBT community of high crime.

00:06:50.280 All right? Is there even one high crime neighborhood of LGBTQ people? None. Basically none. One of my

00:07:01.220 favorite groups in America, because they do a good job, basically. But anyway, I cannot help weighing in

00:07:11.260 on the humor of this topic. If you'll forgive me. I wondered what would happen if you called them and

00:07:19.400 asked for a handy worker, but specified that you would only accept a trans. And they'd say,

00:07:26.420 we've got a woman, we can, ooh, but a woman is good. And maybe, maybe this would be a woman, but I'd really

00:07:34.220 need trans. I really need trans. And they'd say, we also have a lesbian. We can send a lesbian right

00:07:41.660 over. And I'd say, lesbian is great. That's great. But lesbian feels a little 1990s? Can I say that?

00:07:51.480 It feels a little dated? I mean, I need something with a little more, a little more edge. Can you give

00:07:59.260 me a trans? And then they're going to say, which direction? And then everything goes off the rails

00:08:09.880 at that point. Which kind of trans? Yeah, it all gets bad after that. But the funniest sexist comment

00:08:18.540 that I saw was from, on Twitter, somebody named Mike. And Mike said, this is so sexist. It's hilarious.

00:08:28.140 All right. If we could just, if we could just be, you know, like human for a moment and just,

00:08:35.500 and just enjoy what a, what a dick comment this is. It's funny because he's being a dick. All right.

00:08:43.460 So, so if you know that, then, then I think you can do it. So Mike says, don't know. I feel like I

00:08:50.020 would want to pay to see that circus. After making sure, after making sure they are insured, ha ha,

00:08:57.320 I would even bring out the popcorn maker. Ha ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha.

00:09:08.460 Oh, Mike, you're such a dick. Oh, I disavow you so, so hard. All right. Well, while we're on the topic,

00:09:21.220 as long as we're being offensive.

00:09:26.180 Let's do a little bit more, shall we?

00:09:30.740 All right, today I learned on Twitter

00:09:32.540 from Twitter user FisherKing.

00:09:37.040 He tweeted,

00:09:37.840 Did you know they just had the women's...

00:09:41.320 Did you know they just had the women's world chess championship?

00:09:51.220 And FisherKing says,

00:09:52.600 Neither did anyone else.

00:09:54.280 And he says,

00:09:54.900 Ask yourself why there's even such a thing.

00:09:57.560 It's not tennis or MMA.

00:10:02.580 Is it just me?

00:10:03.920 Or is it hilarious that there's a women's only chess?

00:10:09.740 Is that in case somebody can't move the pieces?

00:10:13.080 It's like,

00:10:14.060 All right, I'm going to move...

00:10:16.920 I think I'll move a pawn to...

00:10:21.920 Can you help me move this chess piece over here?

00:10:30.640 I need a little more muscle on this.

00:10:35.460 Anyway, meanwhile,

00:10:37.700 while we watch the hilarious death of wokeness all over,

00:10:43.660 DeSantis said he's kneecapping ESG in Florida.

00:10:48.000 And he's going after,

00:10:49.160 I guess there's some...

00:10:49.980 So the parent company for Bud Light,

00:10:57.340 you all know the Bud Light story.

00:10:59.980 I guess there's some government,

00:11:01.520 there's some Florida entity

00:11:02.620 that still has an investment in him.

00:11:04.120 So he's trying to cut that out.

00:11:06.640 But he's kneecapping ESG.

00:11:09.820 So there's that.

00:11:11.840 So at the same time,

00:11:12.760 he's kneecapping ESG.

00:11:15.000 And you've got the head of BlackRock,

00:11:17.880 Larry Fink,

00:11:19.020 saying that ESG has become a sort of a dirty word.

00:11:22.840 And then we're seeing,

00:11:24.860 skipping ahead a little bit,

00:11:27.120 there's a bunch of DEI professionals

00:11:30.560 getting fired lately.

00:11:31.680 So the Wall Street Journal is saying

00:11:35.160 that these are companies

00:11:37.640 that have gotten rid of DEI employees lately.

00:11:41.240 Netflix, Disney, Warner Brothers, Discovery.

00:11:46.920 I have high-profile people leaving.

00:11:50.000 And now here's sort of a summary of that.

00:11:54.660 They're in the crosshairs, so to speak,

00:11:57.280 because of all the reasons.

00:11:59.560 Basically, none of it's working.

00:12:03.160 And the reporting is

00:12:04.840 that the executives

00:12:06.420 who brought in all these DEI people

00:12:08.620 were just trying to look good,

00:12:11.140 and nothing good came from it.

00:12:13.020 It just caused them more work, apparently.

00:12:15.680 So yeah, there's a woke purge.

00:12:17.960 So ESG is failing.

00:12:20.200 DEI is scaling down.

00:12:22.840 And we have at least three,

00:12:26.440 you can give me the real number,

00:12:27.960 but there's at least three

00:12:29.160 major Republican candidates

00:12:31.920 who want to get rid of all ESG and DEI.

00:12:36.260 Am I right?

00:12:38.020 Three major candidates.

00:12:39.620 But I think it might be all of them.

00:12:41.480 So I might be undercounting.

00:12:42.760 I think it might be,

00:12:44.340 do all of the Republican candidates

00:12:46.040 say they want to get rid of all that stuff?

00:12:48.300 All the racism?

00:12:49.180 So that's pretty good.

00:12:53.060 It sounds terrible

00:12:54.580 that I have to be happy

00:12:55.940 that there are major candidates

00:12:57.880 for president

00:12:58.520 who are opposed to racism.

00:13:01.780 I guess that's good.

00:13:04.360 It's like you have to say it now.

00:13:06.260 They're actually opposed to racism.

00:13:08.240 Okay, good.

00:13:10.860 That's a step forward.

00:13:13.460 All right.

00:13:13.900 I guess we're going to have to talk about

00:13:16.800 all of the scandals.

00:13:19.420 So we've got some Biden scandals.

00:13:21.960 We've got some Trump scandals.

00:13:23.880 And I don't know about you,

00:13:25.300 but I'm starting to mix up

00:13:27.260 all of the Biden scandal stories.

00:13:30.940 Is anybody having that,

00:13:32.020 like, they're all starting to sound

00:13:33.380 too much alike.

00:13:34.620 And then all of the Trump legal problems

00:13:37.680 as well.

00:13:38.920 They're all starting to emerge in my mind.

00:13:40.980 I can't tell which is which.

00:13:42.160 But can you help me out

00:13:44.060 and see if I've forgotten anything?

00:13:46.280 All right.

00:13:46.920 So my understanding is

00:13:48.260 that the Hunter Biden

00:13:50.240 and his father,

00:13:52.440 the big guy,

00:13:53.700 have the following three legal problems.

00:13:57.580 Can you give me a fact check on this?

00:13:59.880 So one of them is

00:14:00.980 the whistleblowers say that

00:14:03.140 the FBI, I think,

00:14:06.340 was slow walking the investigation

00:14:07.940 into Hunter's tax returns.

00:14:10.600 Is that correct?

00:14:11.280 So number one

00:14:13.180 is whistleblowers,

00:14:15.120 very credible ones,

00:14:16.380 say the entire government

00:14:17.780 was basically

00:14:20.440 just not doing their job

00:14:21.880 intentionally

00:14:22.480 to protect Hunter.

00:14:24.900 Second one was the FBI.

00:14:27.940 Now we knew that,

00:14:29.380 we now know that the FBI knew

00:14:31.240 the laptops were real,

00:14:34.680 or the one laptop.

00:14:36.160 So apparently the FBI

00:14:37.380 knew it was real

00:14:38.520 and told the public

00:14:39.960 it wasn't.

00:14:41.580 So that's new, right?

00:14:43.080 Now we know that,

00:14:44.000 that's documented now,

00:14:45.180 so we're not guessing anymore.

00:14:47.160 It's now documented

00:14:48.080 that they knew

00:14:48.820 and they decided to lie.

00:14:52.000 So that's new.

00:14:53.160 And now the third one

00:14:54.660 is this so-called 1023 form,

00:14:57.360 which is what is used

00:14:58.940 to interview people.

00:14:59.800 And there is a witness,

00:15:02.200 or maybe more than one,

00:15:03.980 give me a fact check,

00:15:05.440 is it just one witness,

00:15:06.700 who makes some claims

00:15:08.480 about money from Burisma

00:15:11.000 going to the Bidens

00:15:13.840 and going through a series

00:15:15.560 of concealing accounts

00:15:18.060 and corporate shelves

00:15:19.060 and banks and stuff like that.

00:15:20.760 And even an alleged,

00:15:24.960 alleged statement

00:15:28.520 that the reason

00:15:29.280 they set up this whole labyrinth

00:15:32.340 was to conceal the payments

00:15:33.980 and that they were expecting

00:15:36.180 that the Bidens

00:15:37.040 would help them out

00:15:37.900 getting rid of the prosecutor,

00:15:40.620 which happened.

00:15:41.900 But we don't know

00:15:42.520 if it's because of that,

00:15:44.200 but that's what allegedly

00:15:46.360 they were hoping for,

00:15:48.020 but actually did happen.

00:15:49.760 Now, all of this stuff

00:15:53.360 on that so-called

00:15:54.200 again, fact check me

00:15:57.380 if I'm wrong,

00:15:58.740 is dependent on audio recordings

00:16:02.260 and maybe other documentation

00:16:04.840 that we have not seen.

00:16:07.680 So that basically

00:16:08.620 the only backing

00:16:11.780 for that 1023

00:16:13.580 is just the people

00:16:15.780 who were interviewed, right?

00:16:18.260 Is that true?

00:16:18.880 So could it be said

00:16:20.640 that the 1023

00:16:21.560 could be

00:16:22.480 just another Steele dossier?

00:16:25.440 Is there anything

00:16:26.300 that would rule out

00:16:27.380 the 1023 being fake?

00:16:32.020 Has anything ruled that out?

00:16:34.300 Now, the part we know

00:16:35.420 is there appear

00:16:36.700 to be bank records.

00:16:37.800 Yes, there appear

00:16:38.380 to be bank records.

00:16:39.760 But there could be

00:16:41.180 bank records

00:16:41.940 and shell companies

00:16:43.140 for more than one reason.

00:16:45.320 None of them are good.

00:16:46.340 I don't think there's

00:16:48.520 any legal,

00:16:49.320 legitimate reason

00:16:50.000 to have all those

00:16:50.820 shell companies.

00:16:51.820 We all agree on that, right?

00:16:53.600 Whatever all that

00:16:54.800 labyrinth of financial confusion

00:16:57.700 was about,

00:16:58.960 it definitely wasn't

00:17:00.120 about anything legal.

00:17:02.280 We all know that, right?

00:17:04.660 So that's not even

00:17:06.020 a dispute,

00:17:07.200 I think.

00:17:08.100 I doubt anybody

00:17:08.960 would argue it.

00:17:09.620 But you still need

00:17:11.680 the actual crime

00:17:12.580 just because somebody

00:17:14.600 set up a structure

00:17:15.580 that you would only

00:17:17.560 set up for crime

00:17:18.680 and money actually

00:17:20.180 flew through it

00:17:20.960 exactly like you would

00:17:23.000 for crime,

00:17:23.700 money laundering

00:17:24.360 or at least hiding it

00:17:25.320 from the IRS.

00:17:27.080 And however,

00:17:29.720 if we don't actually have

00:17:31.660 backup for that 1023

00:17:33.840 beyond the financial records,

00:17:36.520 is it going to hold?

00:17:37.540 Do you think that's a,

00:17:40.500 do you think that that could,

00:17:41.980 I don't think it will.

00:17:44.020 I think it's just short

00:17:45.680 of being enough.

00:17:47.740 But I'm not positive.

00:17:49.560 Because, you know,

00:17:50.160 it's not my domain

00:17:50.940 and there'll be lots more

00:17:51.880 we'll find out.

00:17:52.980 But,

00:17:53.920 to me it looks just short.

00:17:57.480 Just short of being,

00:17:59.600 now I'm not saying

00:18:00.460 it's not true.

00:18:02.160 I want to make sure

00:18:03.080 that I'm saying it correctly.

00:18:04.740 I'm not saying

00:18:05.420 that the allegations

00:18:06.160 are untrue.

00:18:07.540 I'm saying that

00:18:08.500 in terms of a court case

00:18:10.460 or, you know,

00:18:11.200 really proving it,

00:18:13.160 it feels like

00:18:13.940 it's just,

00:18:14.580 just lacking.

00:18:16.520 So,

00:18:17.220 we have not ruled out

00:18:19.000 that it's just

00:18:19.540 another Steele dossier.

00:18:21.600 It could actually be

00:18:22.620 Russian disinformation.

00:18:25.100 Like, actually,

00:18:26.080 literally it could be.

00:18:27.500 In the real world,

00:18:28.680 actually,

00:18:29.140 literally this time,

00:18:29.960 it could be

00:18:30.500 Russian disinformation.

00:18:31.560 But what's funny

00:18:33.180 about it

00:18:33.680 is that the Democrats

00:18:36.620 can't use that excuse again,

00:18:38.720 even if it's real.

00:18:40.600 You'd just be laughed at.

00:18:42.340 Oh,

00:18:42.660 it's Russian disinformation again.

00:18:45.300 Isn't that convenient?

00:18:47.300 Which does open up

00:18:48.380 an opportunity

00:18:48.940 for some Russian disinformation

00:18:50.400 if Putin's paying attention.

00:18:53.040 All right,

00:18:54.780 so then Trump

00:18:55.360 is in trouble for,

00:18:56.960 we'll get back

00:18:57.700 to the 1023 thing,

00:18:59.340 he's in trouble

00:19:00.000 for his boxes,

00:19:01.940 right?

00:19:02.920 He's in trouble

00:19:03.880 for inciting

00:19:07.100 J6 stuff,

00:19:08.280 there's some charges

00:19:09.360 that are going to come

00:19:09.960 from that.

00:19:11.720 And is he still

00:19:12.780 in trouble

00:19:13.220 in Georgia

00:19:13.940 for the find the votes

00:19:15.260 phone call?

00:19:15.860 Is that still alive?

00:19:18.100 That's yes.

00:19:19.020 And then there's

00:19:19.860 that F. Gene Carroll thing,

00:19:22.020 but that's civil.

00:19:26.520 So does it look

00:19:27.460 like a tie?

00:19:29.520 Does it look like

00:19:30.480 the two main candidates

00:19:31.760 for president

00:19:32.420 have three scandals apiece?

00:19:35.560 Maybe more?

00:19:37.440 Well,

00:19:37.700 they all have three and a half

00:19:38.840 because they both

00:19:39.420 have a sex accusation.

00:19:42.140 So three and a half

00:19:42.940 scandals apiece?

00:19:44.220 I put the sex scandals

00:19:45.720 as just one scandal.

00:19:49.260 All right,

00:19:49.820 well,

00:19:50.640 so that's out of a tie.

00:19:51.820 Now,

00:19:52.020 what do you think

00:19:52.460 the public is going

00:19:53.460 to make of all this?

00:19:56.020 So,

00:19:56.520 you know,

00:19:56.880 I watch the news

00:19:58.100 and you probably

00:19:59.340 have this experience too.

00:20:00.760 I'll watch the news

00:20:01.660 and it'll be the major

00:20:02.500 headline story

00:20:03.300 for like days

00:20:04.060 and it won't be

00:20:05.380 that difficult

00:20:05.980 to understand.

00:20:07.580 And I'll think,

00:20:08.140 well,

00:20:08.300 surely everybody's

00:20:09.140 heard this story.

00:20:10.420 And the very first person

00:20:12.080 I meet outside

00:20:12.980 of my own house,

00:20:14.660 you know,

00:20:14.860 just run into

00:20:15.460 somebody,

00:20:16.320 haven't seen them

00:20:16.900 in a while,

00:20:17.820 and politics comes up.

00:20:20.160 They haven't heard

00:20:20.920 any of these stories.

00:20:22.500 The average person

00:20:23.460 isn't watching

00:20:24.040 any news

00:20:24.760 at all.

00:20:26.060 No news at all.

00:20:28.160 They're just not

00:20:28.880 watching anything.

00:20:30.120 So what happens

00:20:30.900 when you take

00:20:31.540 not just regular news

00:20:33.340 that they're not watching,

00:20:35.000 most of the country,

00:20:36.760 but what happens

00:20:37.600 if it's a really

00:20:38.700 complicated legal thing

00:20:40.060 where even the lawyers

00:20:40.900 can't figure out

00:20:41.600 what's true?

00:20:42.060 I'm not sure

00:20:44.140 it affects the election.

00:20:46.600 I think the level

00:20:47.620 of confusion

00:20:48.320 about all this stuff

00:20:49.200 is so great

00:20:49.920 that the voters

00:20:51.520 are just going to go,

00:20:52.440 I don't know,

00:20:52.940 it looks like two people

00:20:53.860 with legal problems.

00:20:55.480 I call it a tie.

00:20:57.240 It's going to look

00:20:57.960 like a tie.

00:21:00.420 Unless one of them

00:21:01.200 is in jail,

00:21:02.020 it's going to look

00:21:02.760 like a tie.

00:21:04.020 Now,

00:21:04.440 that doesn't mean

00:21:04.940 it is.

00:21:06.020 It's just that the public

00:21:07.040 won't be able

00:21:07.580 to sort it out.

00:21:08.320 It'll be too complicated.

00:21:10.820 All right.

00:21:13.640 So the 1023 story

00:21:16.920 is that there were

00:21:17.600 payments made

00:21:18.220 to the Bidens

00:21:18.880 for getting

00:21:21.980 a prosecutor fired.

00:21:23.860 Biden has bragged

00:21:25.760 in public

00:21:26.200 that he got

00:21:26.760 that guy fired,

00:21:28.640 but said the reason

00:21:29.540 was because he was

00:21:31.500 crooked

00:21:31.860 and everybody

00:21:32.740 wanted him fired,

00:21:34.120 which might be true.

00:21:35.000 I don't know

00:21:36.700 what's true

00:21:37.140 over there.

00:21:38.320 I just figure

00:21:39.020 everybody's lying

00:21:39.680 about everything.

00:21:40.660 If it's Ukraine,

00:21:42.340 everybody's lying

00:21:43.000 about everything.

00:21:44.840 So,

00:21:45.400 we'll see

00:21:46.540 if any of that

00:21:47.180 turns out

00:21:49.180 to be true.

00:21:52.520 Jonathan Turley

00:21:53.360 is pointing out

00:21:54.020 that NBC

00:21:54.560 is trying to cover

00:21:55.440 for the Bidens

00:21:56.240 by calling

00:21:56.940 the whistleblower

00:21:57.820 the IRS whistleblower.

00:22:01.420 Actually,

00:22:02.020 two of them,

00:22:03.280 two whistleblowers

00:22:04.240 who confirm

00:22:05.900 each other's story,

00:22:06.780 it's the most

00:22:07.700 credible thing

00:22:08.440 you could ever

00:22:08.920 see.

00:22:09.760 They're the most

00:22:10.380 classic

00:22:11.180 exact examples

00:22:14.140 of government

00:22:14.920 whistleblowers.

00:22:17.060 And what does

00:22:17.560 NBC call them?

00:22:19.300 So-called whistleblowers.

00:22:21.440 So-called whistleblowers.

00:22:22.840 I guess the so-called

00:22:25.520 whistleblowers

00:22:26.220 were at the

00:22:28.380 so-called hearing

00:22:29.660 at the so-called

00:22:30.420 Congress

00:22:30.960 in the so-called

00:22:33.380 United States

00:22:34.260 in the so-called

00:22:36.440 earlier part

00:22:37.780 of the week.

00:22:40.580 Yep,

00:22:41.440 that really

00:22:42.000 happened.

00:22:43.520 Scarborough,

00:22:44.040 what's his first

00:22:46.360 name?

00:22:47.580 Scarborough

00:22:48.020 Joe.

00:22:51.620 Yeah.

00:22:52.200 Morning Joe.

00:22:53.420 Yeah,

00:22:53.700 I should remember

00:22:54.380 that.

00:22:55.360 Scarborough says

00:22:56.080 we have these

00:22:57.580 so-called

00:22:58.040 whistleblowers.

00:23:00.720 And he says

00:23:01.140 it's a

00:23:01.580 I'm out of my

00:23:05.860 asthma meds.

00:23:09.500 So it's going to

00:23:10.180 be tough to get

00:23:10.720 through the show

00:23:11.160 actually.

00:23:12.740 He says

00:23:13.020 this is a clown show

00:23:13.840 with the House

00:23:14.760 Republicans.

00:23:16.100 It's just a clown show.

00:23:18.080 All right.

00:23:20.020 There was

00:23:20.720 this censorship

00:23:21.580 hearing

00:23:22.880 yesterday.

00:23:25.440 And

00:23:25.520 RFK Jr.

00:23:28.900 was one of

00:23:29.880 the main

00:23:30.780 people testifying.

00:23:33.260 And believe it

00:23:33.940 or not,

00:23:34.500 this sounds like

00:23:35.060 a joke,

00:23:36.420 the Democrats

00:23:37.180 tried to censor

00:23:38.440 him so that we

00:23:39.260 couldn't see the

00:23:39.900 hearing.

00:23:40.720 So it'd be a

00:23:41.540 secret hearing.

00:23:43.020 That actually

00:23:44.160 happened.

00:23:46.080 Can you believe

00:23:46.960 that?

00:23:47.720 It was actually

00:23:48.760 a censorship

00:23:49.400 hearing,

00:23:50.560 government

00:23:51.060 censorship,

00:23:52.180 and the

00:23:52.760 government,

00:23:53.580 the Democrats,

00:23:55.180 tried to have

00:23:55.760 it censored.

00:23:56.760 I'm not making

00:23:57.680 that up.

00:23:58.980 I'm not making

00:23:59.860 that up.

00:24:00.660 That's a real

00:24:01.500 thing that happened.

00:24:02.900 And they didn't

00:24:03.680 even hide it.

00:24:05.020 They didn't even

00:24:05.660 hide it.

00:24:06.500 It was just

00:24:06.920 completely open.

00:24:07.640 Let's censor

00:24:09.560 this guy who

00:24:10.160 wants to talk

00:24:10.700 about censorship.

00:24:13.940 Again,

00:24:14.800 if the public

00:24:16.240 were paying

00:24:16.880 attention,

00:24:18.100 that would

00:24:18.820 probably be

00:24:19.380 pretty bad

00:24:19.940 for Democrats.

00:24:21.440 But I don't

00:24:21.980 think they are,

00:24:22.740 plus it's

00:24:23.200 summer.

00:24:24.020 Nobody believes

00:24:24.960 any summer

00:24:25.400 stories anyway,

00:24:26.700 or they

00:24:27.440 shouldn't.

00:24:30.000 But,

00:24:30.440 so RFK Jr.

00:24:32.700 did something

00:24:33.140 awesome.

00:24:33.600 Everybody's

00:24:33.960 heard about it

00:24:34.400 by now.

00:24:34.720 he had some

00:24:36.580 opening statements

00:24:37.500 prepared.

00:24:39.000 But he did

00:24:40.000 that dramatic

00:24:40.620 thing where

00:24:41.200 he sets them

00:24:41.980 aside.

00:24:43.480 And then he

00:24:44.000 goes off on

00:24:44.780 probably the

00:24:48.500 most impressive

00:24:49.540 extemporaneous

00:24:51.000 speech you

00:24:53.080 might ever see

00:24:53.680 in your life.

00:24:55.080 It was

00:24:55.360 actually,

00:24:55.980 it was just,

00:24:57.260 it was mind

00:24:57.820 blowingly

00:24:58.360 amazing.

00:25:00.680 And he did

00:25:01.540 it with his,

00:25:02.320 you know,

00:25:03.380 his speech

00:25:04.020 issues.

00:25:05.680 And I gotta

00:25:06.200 say,

00:25:07.700 every time

00:25:08.680 he does

00:25:09.180 this thing,

00:25:11.680 it's

00:25:13.740 impressive.

00:25:14.900 He makes

00:25:15.520 you listen

00:25:16.060 to something

00:25:16.640 you don't

00:25:17.020 want to

00:25:17.280 listen to,

00:25:17.880 if I can

00:25:18.300 be frank

00:25:19.080 about it.

00:25:19.660 You don't

00:25:20.100 want to

00:25:20.340 hear his

00:25:20.660 voice,

00:25:21.940 but if

00:25:22.900 you take

00:25:23.820 a minute

00:25:24.320 of it,

00:25:25.060 if you

00:25:25.340 listen to

00:25:25.740 the first

00:25:26.120 minute,

00:25:26.880 you'll be

00:25:27.260 hooked.

00:25:28.480 And you'll

00:25:29.080 stay for

00:25:29.480 ten minutes,

00:25:30.420 and you'll

00:25:30.780 be glad you

00:25:31.340 did.

00:25:32.080 And when

00:25:32.400 you're done,

00:25:32.880 you're gonna

00:25:33.140 say,

00:25:34.260 damn,

00:25:34.720 we got

00:25:36.620 some good

00:25:37.100 people running

00:25:37.680 for president.

00:25:40.200 He might

00:25:40.860 not be your

00:25:41.340 choice,

00:25:41.940 I get it,

00:25:42.680 policy-wise,

00:25:43.700 but he is

00:25:45.040 really impressive,

00:25:46.460 right?

00:25:47.140 We've got,

00:25:47.800 you know,

00:25:48.020 now we've got

00:25:48.560 Vivek,

00:25:49.400 impressive as

00:25:50.160 hell.

00:25:51.280 You know,

00:25:51.560 people like

00:25:52.020 Trump,

00:25:52.360 I think

00:25:52.620 DeSantis is

00:25:53.340 solid in

00:25:53.840 his own

00:25:54.120 way.

00:25:56.180 We have

00:25:56.800 really good

00:25:57.400 candidates,

00:25:58.800 really good

00:25:59.440 candidates.

00:26:00.180 Joe Biden

00:26:00.620 is not one

00:26:01.200 of them,

00:26:01.900 but we

00:26:02.180 really do,

00:26:02.940 you should

00:26:03.380 be really

00:26:03.760 happy about

00:26:04.300 that.

00:26:05.340 In my

00:26:05.940 opinion,

00:26:06.480 this is the

00:26:06.960 best field

00:26:07.440 of candidates

00:26:08.040 we've ever

00:26:08.580 seen.

00:26:10.360 And I

00:26:10.640 don't think

00:26:10.980 there was,

00:26:11.580 you know,

00:26:11.760 name another

00:26:12.260 candidate who

00:26:13.520 could have

00:26:13.840 done what

00:26:14.220 RFK Jr.

00:26:15.040 did.

00:26:16.100 And by

00:26:16.540 the way,

00:26:16.760 you should

00:26:17.000 listen to

00:26:17.480 it.

00:26:17.600 If I

00:26:18.560 tried to

00:26:18.960 characterize

00:26:19.400 it,

00:26:20.440 it would

00:26:21.460 lose all

00:26:22.220 of its

00:26:22.500 steam.

00:26:23.140 But the

00:26:23.420 basic idea

00:26:24.100 is he

00:26:24.380 talks about

00:26:25.020 the degree

00:26:26.640 to which he

00:26:27.180 was personally

00:26:28.040 censored.

00:26:29.120 And I

00:26:30.240 was not

00:26:30.660 aware.

00:26:31.560 I was not

00:26:32.160 aware of

00:26:32.540 how overtly

00:26:33.480 political it

00:26:34.180 was.

00:26:35.880 I thought it

00:26:36.580 was just a

00:26:37.020 lot of

00:26:37.220 people thought

00:26:37.700 he was

00:26:37.940 nuts,

00:26:38.880 so they

00:26:39.140 were just

00:26:39.460 sort of

00:26:40.180 acting

00:26:40.500 accordingly.

00:26:41.540 But no,

00:26:41.960 it looked

00:26:42.220 pretty organized.

00:26:43.660 And it

00:26:43.980 looked like

00:26:44.300 the timing

00:26:44.800 was not

00:26:45.820 coincidental,

00:26:46.600 and it

00:26:46.760 looked like

00:26:47.080 it was

00:26:47.300 entirely

00:26:47.820 political.

00:26:49.060 It was

00:26:49.480 actually

00:26:49.820 political

00:26:50.320 censorship.

00:26:52.260 And it

00:26:52.720 was jaw-dropping

00:26:54.160 to hear the

00:26:54.620 evidence,

00:26:55.920 but it

00:26:56.680 was also

00:26:57.240 inspirational

00:26:58.040 to hear

00:26:59.900 a Kennedy

00:27:00.560 speaking in

00:27:01.780 a Kennedy-esque

00:27:02.860 style.

00:27:04.160 And the

00:27:04.640 beauty is you

00:27:05.220 can say that

00:27:06.160 he was speaking

00:27:06.660 in a Kennedy-esque

00:27:07.720 style, and

00:27:09.140 it's not like

00:27:09.900 an analogy or

00:27:10.640 anything.

00:27:11.500 He's a

00:27:11.960 Kennedy.

00:27:13.500 Apparently they

00:27:14.260 learned that at

00:27:14.860 birth or

00:27:15.260 something.

00:27:15.860 They learned

00:27:16.260 how to talk

00:27:16.700 that way.

00:27:17.480 That was

00:27:17.840 just impressive.

00:27:18.860 So I

00:27:19.140 recommend it.

00:27:20.120 I recommend

00:27:20.880 it if you

00:27:21.260 just want to

00:27:21.680 feel good

00:27:22.040 about the

00:27:22.380 country.

00:27:23.540 If you

00:27:24.080 just want

00:27:24.420 to feel

00:27:24.800 good about

00:27:26.240 being an

00:27:26.640 American for

00:27:27.360 like 10

00:27:27.860 minutes,

00:27:29.040 just listen

00:27:29.560 to RFK

00:27:30.100 Jr.

00:27:30.520 talk about

00:27:31.120 America,

00:27:32.640 what it

00:27:32.980 should be

00:27:33.320 and what

00:27:33.600 it isn't.

00:27:36.280 So good

00:27:37.020 on him.

00:27:38.520 By the

00:27:39.000 way, I

00:27:39.420 absolutely

00:27:39.940 love that

00:27:41.300 I can say

00:27:41.860 unambiguously

00:27:42.680 positive things

00:27:43.660 about somebody

00:27:44.400 whose policies

00:27:47.040 don't line up

00:27:47.860 with mine

00:27:48.200 exactly.

00:27:49.940 I love

00:27:50.560 that.

00:27:51.720 I like

00:27:52.340 that I

00:27:52.600 can just

00:27:52.900 treat him

00:27:53.200 with respect

00:27:53.880 and that

00:27:54.400 that could

00:27:54.700 be the

00:27:54.960 end of

00:27:55.220 the

00:27:55.320 conversation.

00:27:55.940 We

00:27:56.380 just

00:27:56.600 disagree

00:27:56.960 on a

00:27:57.200 few

00:27:57.280 things.

00:27:58.980 All

00:27:59.060 right.

00:28:01.400 There's a

00:28:02.000 story that

00:28:02.440 Vivek

00:28:03.140 Ramaswamy

00:28:03.880 has beaten

00:28:04.760 DeSantis

00:28:05.320 in some

00:28:06.520 Kaplan

00:28:07.440 strategies

00:28:08.120 poll that

00:28:09.000 most people

00:28:09.760 who don't

00:28:11.360 like the

00:28:11.700 result are

00:28:12.260 saying there's

00:28:12.860 a BS

00:28:13.480 poll and

00:28:14.160 you should

00:28:14.420 not believe

00:28:14.900 it.

00:28:15.460 So I

00:28:15.860 don't believe

00:28:16.220 polls in

00:28:16.660 general at

00:28:17.100 this point,

00:28:17.820 but it's

00:28:19.520 the story.

00:28:21.380 So although

00:28:22.200 the polling

00:28:22.920 entity may

00:28:25.320 be questioned

00:28:26.200 and certainly

00:28:28.100 the recent

00:28:28.840 straw polls

00:28:29.700 like the

00:28:31.240 TPUSA

00:28:32.080 straw poll

00:28:32.900 where Vivek

00:28:34.140 came in

00:28:34.440 second,

00:28:35.480 you can

00:28:35.900 say that's

00:28:36.300 not a

00:28:36.560 real poll,

00:28:37.320 that's a

00:28:37.720 straw poll.

00:28:39.260 And then I

00:28:39.560 saw Kanekoa

00:28:40.780 the Great

00:28:41.280 on Twitter,

00:28:42.500 he ran

00:28:42.900 his own

00:28:43.240 poll.

00:28:43.720 Again,

00:28:44.160 a Twitter

00:28:44.520 poll is

00:28:45.140 completely

00:28:46.000 unscientific,

00:28:47.140 but Ramaswamy

00:28:48.060 came in

00:28:48.460 second to

00:28:50.120 Trump.

00:28:51.240 So there

00:28:52.420 are three

00:28:53.040 instances

00:28:53.780 recently,

00:28:54.440 in the

00:28:55.000 last week,

00:28:55.960 in which

00:28:56.580 Vivek

00:28:57.100 placed

00:28:57.820 second or

00:28:58.760 competitively

00:28:59.580 with

00:29:00.100 DeSantis.

00:29:02.020 Now,

00:29:02.700 I'll say

00:29:03.040 again,

00:29:03.840 none of

00:29:04.400 that data

00:29:04.800 is reliable,

00:29:06.500 and some

00:29:07.120 of it

00:29:07.400 could be

00:29:07.760 wildly

00:29:08.380 unreliable,

00:29:09.500 probably

00:29:09.820 is.

00:29:10.760 But that

00:29:11.960 doesn't

00:29:12.240 matter to

00:29:12.680 the narrative.

00:29:13.960 It doesn't

00:29:14.560 matter to

00:29:15.060 the momentum,

00:29:17.120 right?

00:29:17.700 So there's

00:29:18.840 a momentum

00:29:19.320 issue.

00:29:20.600 So we're

00:29:21.200 already looking

00:29:21.920 at, you

00:29:22.740 know,

00:29:23.380 what might

00:29:24.360 happen in

00:29:25.020 the upcoming

00:29:25.860 primaries.

00:29:27.340 Vivek might

00:29:27.840 make a dent

00:29:29.240 there.

00:29:31.020 We're already

00:29:31.760 talking about

00:29:32.360 DeSantis

00:29:32.840 having to

00:29:33.580 retool his

00:29:34.240 campaign,

00:29:35.000 and why

00:29:35.820 isn't he

00:29:36.160 doing better

00:29:36.680 with all

00:29:37.000 the money

00:29:37.320 he has.

00:29:38.580 We're already

00:29:39.000 telling,

00:29:39.500 the news

00:29:40.100 is already

00:29:40.460 talking about

00:29:41.060 DeSantis

00:29:41.520 has all

00:29:41.960 this funding,

00:29:43.380 yet Vivek is

00:29:44.280 operating on

00:29:44.900 the shoestring

00:29:45.600 and killing

00:29:47.660 it using

00:29:48.360 new techniques,

00:29:49.560 basically,

00:29:50.080 and smarter

00:29:50.680 techniques.

00:29:51.180 who does

00:29:52.540 Vivek remind

00:29:53.320 you of

00:29:53.800 in his

00:29:54.280 campaigning?

00:29:55.880 Tell me

00:29:56.200 who he

00:29:56.440 reminds you

00:29:56.960 of.

00:29:59.440 Vivek

00:30:00.040 campaigning.

00:30:01.620 Trump

00:30:01.860 2015.

00:30:03.120 Yes,

00:30:03.580 Trump

00:30:03.800 2015.

00:30:04.960 Yeah,

00:30:05.220 he's using,

00:30:05.940 he's using,

00:30:06.880 what would

00:30:07.440 you call

00:30:07.820 it,

00:30:09.300 asymmetrical

00:30:10.160 techniques.

00:30:13.280 Basically,

00:30:13.780 he's going

00:30:14.620 on to

00:30:15.060 enemy podcasts

00:30:16.240 and owning

00:30:16.880 them.

00:30:17.080 who did

00:30:19.060 that?

00:30:20.840 Who said

00:30:21.480 I'm going

00:30:21.760 to go on

00:30:22.400 all the

00:30:22.820 most critical

00:30:23.660 podcasts

00:30:24.440 and TV

00:30:25.600 shows like

00:30:26.180 CNN and

00:30:27.280 I'm going

00:30:27.560 to own

00:30:27.900 them and

00:30:28.580 that's

00:30:28.800 how it

00:30:29.020 went?

00:30:30.660 Yeah,

00:30:31.060 it's sort

00:30:31.400 of a

00:30:31.560 Trump method

00:30:32.580 in a way.

00:30:34.460 So,

00:30:35.060 I think

00:30:35.760 Vivek is

00:30:36.340 doing a

00:30:36.920 modified,

00:30:38.820 improved,

00:30:39.760 it's an

00:30:40.180 improved version

00:30:40.820 of Trump

00:30:42.020 and it

00:30:42.880 works.

00:30:44.060 So,

00:30:44.380 every time

00:30:44.780 you see

00:30:45.260 Vivek do

00:30:46.020 something smart,

00:30:47.080 tell yourself

00:30:48.820 this,

00:30:50.340 when was

00:30:50.880 the last

00:30:51.180 time you

00:30:51.480 saw him

00:30:51.740 do something

00:30:52.160 that wasn't

00:30:52.740 smart?

00:30:54.860 You haven't.

00:30:56.820 He's

00:30:57.220 running,

00:30:57.640 he's running

00:30:58.440 the best

00:30:58.880 campaign

00:30:59.420 by far.

00:31:01.160 How many

00:31:01.660 would agree

00:31:02.180 with the

00:31:02.480 following

00:31:02.760 statement,

00:31:03.480 regardless

00:31:03.880 of whether

00:31:04.320 you want

00:31:04.600 him to

00:31:04.820 be your

00:31:05.060 president?

00:31:06.020 How many

00:31:06.360 would agree

00:31:06.900 so far

00:31:08.000 Vivek has

00:31:09.820 the best

00:31:10.200 campaign

00:31:10.720 on either

00:31:11.280 side and

00:31:12.440 somewhat

00:31:12.800 obviously

00:31:13.380 so?

00:31:14.560 I would

00:31:15.300 say he's

00:31:15.700 floating well

00:31:16.740 above the

00:31:17.280 other

00:31:17.480 candidates

00:31:18.040 in skill.

00:31:20.060 Yeah,

00:31:20.540 and basically

00:31:21.860 I'm seeing

00:31:22.320 every one

00:31:22.820 of you

00:31:23.060 agree,

00:31:24.020 almost 100%.

00:31:26.140 Are you

00:31:27.060 going to

00:31:27.180 tell me

00:31:27.420 that's not

00:31:27.840 predictive?

00:31:29.920 That's very

00:31:30.720 predictive.

00:31:32.280 Because remember,

00:31:33.120 Vivek doesn't

00:31:33.840 have a

00:31:34.620 government

00:31:35.360 experience,

00:31:36.760 so you

00:31:37.180 can't say

00:31:37.620 you liked

00:31:38.060 him as

00:31:38.400 a governor

00:31:39.240 or something.

00:31:40.320 The only

00:31:40.880 thing you're

00:31:41.380 going to

00:31:41.620 see,

00:31:42.060 since you

00:31:42.380 didn't see

00:31:42.760 him running

00:31:43.100 his businesses,

00:31:43.720 you're

00:31:44.720 going to

00:31:44.820 see him

00:31:45.100 running a

00:31:45.520 campaign.

00:31:48.040 So the

00:31:48.640 more he

00:31:49.020 does a

00:31:49.420 good job

00:31:49.800 of running

00:31:50.180 a campaign

00:31:50.860 the way

00:31:51.400 he has,

00:31:52.400 the more

00:31:52.740 you're

00:31:52.980 going to

00:31:53.040 say,

00:31:53.300 well,

00:31:53.420 that guy

00:31:53.720 can do

00:31:54.060 stuff.

00:31:54.940 He can

00:31:55.520 do stuff

00:31:56.020 and he's

00:31:57.000 in a field

00:31:57.460 where he's

00:31:58.280 competing

00:31:58.620 against all

00:31:59.200 the other

00:31:59.500 people who

00:31:59.980 are the

00:32:00.280 highest

00:32:00.580 quality

00:32:01.140 candidates

00:32:02.180 doing

00:32:02.580 stuff.

00:32:03.780 And the

00:32:04.320 stuff that

00:32:04.740 all of

00:32:05.100 them are

00:32:05.340 doing,

00:32:06.700 he's doing

00:32:07.120 better.

00:32:08.460 You can't

00:32:09.680 ignore that

00:32:10.260 after a

00:32:10.700 while.

00:32:12.180 Right?

00:32:12.820 And I

00:32:13.400 also think

00:32:13.920 he's the

00:32:14.420 sexy story.

00:32:16.700 Here's a

00:32:17.420 tip about

00:32:19.440 getting free

00:32:20.480 press.

00:32:21.780 The press

00:32:22.600 does not

00:32:23.180 care that

00:32:24.020 somebody's

00:32:24.480 doing a

00:32:24.820 good job.

00:32:26.280 That's not

00:32:26.900 a story.

00:32:27.560 Because people

00:32:28.240 do good

00:32:28.720 jobs.

00:32:30.760 It's a

00:32:31.360 story if

00:32:31.780 you do a

00:32:32.200 good job

00:32:32.580 in a

00:32:32.840 different

00:32:33.080 way.

00:32:35.160 And that's

00:32:35.780 what he's

00:32:36.100 doing.

00:32:36.700 He's doing

00:32:37.060 a good

00:32:37.380 job in a

00:32:37.880 different

00:32:38.140 way.

00:32:38.980 You know,

00:32:39.200 the podcast,

00:32:39.920 the shoestring,

00:32:41.140 even his

00:32:42.360 policies being

00:32:43.320 as clear as

00:32:44.140 they are and

00:32:44.800 provocative,

00:32:45.660 et cetera.

00:32:47.160 And eventually

00:32:48.480 you just

00:32:48.860 notice that.

00:32:49.820 So every

00:32:50.860 sign is

00:32:52.580 starting to

00:32:53.420 start to

00:32:56.080 indicate that

00:32:56.620 he will

00:32:56.880 rise.

00:32:58.080 Now, don't

00:32:58.880 believe the

00:32:59.300 polling yet.

00:33:00.400 I think if

00:33:00.860 you see a

00:33:01.240 national poll,

00:33:01.960 he's going

00:33:02.200 to be lower

00:33:02.580 than these

00:33:03.120 sketchy

00:33:04.040 polls.

00:33:04.740 But the

00:33:05.180 sketchy

00:33:05.600 polls do

00:33:06.160 pick up,

00:33:07.200 in my

00:33:07.500 opinion,

00:33:08.060 if there's

00:33:08.480 enough of

00:33:08.820 the sketchy

00:33:09.320 ones,

00:33:09.920 and they

00:33:10.420 all look

00:33:10.740 the same,

00:33:11.540 it's

00:33:12.040 picking up

00:33:12.520 an early

00:33:13.220 indication.

00:33:15.340 Think about

00:33:15.920 the fact,

00:33:16.940 just hold

00:33:17.580 this in

00:33:17.840 your mind,

00:33:18.820 that I

00:33:19.180 asked,

00:33:19.900 I don't

00:33:20.200 know,

00:33:20.300 there's

00:33:20.400 probably

00:33:20.640 several

00:33:21.540 thousand

00:33:21.900 people

00:33:22.240 watching

00:33:22.580 right

00:33:22.800 now.

00:33:23.580 I

00:33:23.980 asked

00:33:24.200 several

00:33:24.660 thousand

00:33:25.200 people

00:33:25.640 to agree

00:33:26.800 with the

00:33:27.140 statement

00:33:27.400 that Vivek

00:33:28.080 has the

00:33:28.480 best

00:33:28.840 campaign

00:33:30.560 by far.

00:33:32.520 And the

00:33:32.840 by far

00:33:33.300 thing should

00:33:34.420 have definitely

00:33:34.880 got me some

00:33:35.500 no's.

00:33:35.920 some

00:33:36.880 of you

00:33:37.240 should

00:33:37.540 have

00:33:37.660 said,

00:33:38.360 no,

00:33:38.800 you know,

00:33:39.080 somebody

00:33:39.300 else is

00:33:39.640 doing

00:33:39.820 just as

00:33:40.260 well.

00:33:41.080 But nobody

00:33:41.860 did.

00:33:42.720 None of

00:33:43.180 you.

00:33:44.040 Every single

00:33:44.780 person that

00:33:45.500 I saw,

00:33:45.940 I may have

00:33:46.300 missed one,

00:33:47.000 but every

00:33:47.540 answer I

00:33:48.020 saw streaming

00:33:48.640 by was

00:33:49.780 going,

00:33:50.100 oh yeah,

00:33:50.380 it's the

00:33:50.600 best campaign

00:33:51.140 by far.

00:33:53.340 You tell

00:33:53.980 me that's

00:33:54.300 not predictive.

00:33:57.020 That's

00:33:57.500 completely

00:33:57.940 predictive.

00:33:59.020 Completely.

00:34:00.160 Polls are

00:34:00.560 not.

00:34:01.040 Polls are

00:34:01.560 not predictive.

00:34:02.120 But a

00:34:03.400 stream of

00:34:03.900 yeses with

00:34:04.460 no no's?

00:34:06.040 Completely

00:34:06.560 predictive.

00:34:09.040 A lot

00:34:10.480 will happen,

00:34:11.240 so you

00:34:11.500 can't say

00:34:11.940 that's the

00:34:15.240 end point,

00:34:15.800 but it's

00:34:16.100 very

00:34:16.280 predictive.

00:34:19.040 All right.

00:34:21.260 Even

00:34:21.700 Trump

00:34:22.420 praised

00:34:23.100 Vivek,

00:34:24.040 and I

00:34:24.360 guess it

00:34:24.620 was in

00:34:24.860 the truth,

00:34:25.860 saying that

00:34:26.500 he had

00:34:26.840 pulled into

00:34:27.560 second place

00:34:28.280 and he

00:34:28.500 was doing

00:34:28.800 great.

00:34:29.140 Do you

00:34:31.980 think that

00:34:32.360 that's

00:34:32.640 an accident

00:34:34.000 that Trump

00:34:35.440 is boosting

00:34:36.680 Vivek?

00:34:38.200 And that

00:34:38.820 when Vivek

00:34:39.380 is asked

00:34:39.840 to criticize

00:34:40.440 Trump,

00:34:41.480 he won't

00:34:41.980 do it,

00:34:42.440 and he

00:34:42.600 says Trump

00:34:43.000 was a

00:34:43.320 great

00:34:43.520 president.

00:34:45.440 He says,

00:34:46.140 Vivek says

00:34:46.820 I'm not

00:34:47.160 running against

00:34:47.780 anybody.

00:34:51.200 That's

00:34:51.640 pretty much

00:34:52.120 exactly what

00:34:52.840 I want to

00:34:53.180 hear.

00:34:54.260 Don't you

00:34:54.560 love that?

00:34:55.700 I'm not

00:34:56.100 running against

00:34:56.720 anybody,

00:34:57.240 I'm running

00:34:57.600 for the

00:34:57.960 United States.

00:34:59.140 So I'm

00:35:00.120 running for

00:35:00.560 the United

00:35:00.940 States,

00:35:01.360 I'm offering

00:35:01.800 you a set

00:35:02.400 of skills

00:35:03.140 and a set

00:35:03.820 of policies.

00:35:05.700 If the

00:35:06.280 other people

00:35:06.740 are better,

00:35:07.200 vote for

00:35:07.480 them.

00:35:08.040 I mean,

00:35:08.260 he doesn't

00:35:08.500 say that

00:35:08.840 part.

00:35:09.380 But he's

00:35:09.580 saying this

00:35:09.900 is my

00:35:10.200 offer,

00:35:11.120 it's not

00:35:11.860 my job

00:35:12.280 to make

00:35:12.580 them look

00:35:12.940 bad.

00:35:13.940 Just look

00:35:14.360 at my

00:35:14.580 offer.

00:35:15.940 It's

00:35:16.160 really

00:35:16.380 strong,

00:35:17.220 very

00:35:17.580 strong.

00:35:18.360 Because

00:35:18.620 the weak

00:35:21.580 play,

00:35:22.060 the weak

00:35:22.840 play is to

00:35:23.400 say that

00:35:23.740 the other

00:35:24.080 one is

00:35:24.420 worse.

00:35:25.740 You know,

00:35:26.160 oh man,

00:35:27.000 Biden's

00:35:27.600 falling apart,

00:35:28.360 he's 100

00:35:28.760 years old.

00:35:29.900 That's the

00:35:30.420 weak play.

00:35:31.280 At least

00:35:31.720 I'm alive.

00:35:33.700 His play

00:35:34.420 is the

00:35:34.760 strongest play

00:35:35.400 you can

00:35:35.720 make.

00:35:36.400 I'm not

00:35:36.800 even running

00:35:37.280 against

00:35:37.620 competition.

00:35:39.480 I'm not

00:35:39.820 even running

00:35:40.220 against anybody.

00:35:41.380 You can't

00:35:41.820 get stronger

00:35:42.280 than that,

00:35:42.920 messaging-wise.

00:35:43.760 All right,

00:35:46.660 so let's

00:35:47.120 do a little

00:35:47.620 take a

00:35:49.500 look at

00:35:49.980 Go

00:35:50.460 Woke,

00:35:50.900 Go

00:35:51.080 Broke,

00:35:51.540 how that's

00:35:51.860 going.

00:35:52.280 So Bud

00:35:52.740 Light did

00:35:53.240 poorly,

00:35:54.580 getting woke.

00:35:55.680 Target

00:35:56.080 stores,

00:35:56.920 I believe

00:35:57.400 they're still

00:35:57.780 down,

00:35:58.260 stock price,

00:35:58.960 Disney,

00:36:00.080 taking a

00:36:00.540 hit,

00:36:01.140 Ben and

00:36:01.560 Jerry's

00:36:01.960 taking a

00:36:02.380 hit,

00:36:03.600 Stanford

00:36:04.180 Law School

00:36:04.940 is getting

00:36:06.440 rid of their

00:36:06.860 DEI

00:36:07.500 administrator,

00:36:08.220 who accosted

00:36:10.100 a sitting

00:36:10.480 federal judge

00:36:11.440 during one

00:36:13.740 of their

00:36:13.980 speaking

00:36:14.440 events.

00:36:15.820 She was

00:36:16.300 in the

00:36:16.520 crowd and

00:36:17.100 accosted

00:36:17.800 the speaker

00:36:18.460 for his

00:36:19.380 political

00:36:19.740 views,

00:36:20.180 I think.

00:36:21.180 Or not

00:36:21.820 even political,

00:36:22.940 just for

00:36:23.540 his views.

00:36:24.660 They invited

00:36:25.260 a speaker

00:36:25.780 and then

00:36:26.260 she

00:36:26.460 heckled

00:36:26.920 him.

00:36:28.900 And she

00:36:29.380 worked for

00:36:30.560 the school.

00:36:32.200 So she's

00:36:32.920 going.

00:36:34.100 And then

00:36:34.660 Derek Chauvin

00:36:36.320 is appealing

00:36:37.380 his

00:36:38.020 conviction

00:36:38.440 to the

00:36:38.880 Supreme

00:36:39.240 Court.

00:36:41.020 Now,

00:36:42.720 what do

00:36:44.440 you think

00:36:44.780 about that?

00:36:46.440 In my

00:36:47.200 opinion,

00:36:48.020 so this

00:36:48.680 is my

00:36:48.980 opinion of

00:36:49.420 the whole

00:36:49.700 George Floyd

00:36:50.380 situation.

00:36:53.020 While I'm

00:36:53.780 no expert

00:36:54.440 on police

00:36:55.880 procedure,

00:36:57.320 so I

00:36:57.820 don't have

00:36:58.280 an opinion

00:36:58.620 on whether

00:36:58.980 he violated

00:36:59.540 police

00:36:59.920 procedure,

00:37:02.000 but I

00:37:04.900 did not

00:37:05.280 see him

00:37:05.660 murdering

00:37:06.100 anybody.

00:37:06.460 I watched

00:37:08.000 the video

00:37:08.440 too,

00:37:08.820 and I

00:37:09.060 didn't

00:37:09.200 see it.

00:37:10.160 I saw

00:37:10.520 a tragic

00:37:11.060 situation,

00:37:12.520 and I

00:37:12.840 saw a

00:37:13.620 prisoner who

00:37:14.380 made every

00:37:14.960 mistake that

00:37:16.400 led to his

00:37:17.020 own death.

00:37:18.660 Probably he

00:37:19.380 took a bunch

00:37:19.980 of pills

00:37:20.880 when he got

00:37:21.380 stopped just

00:37:22.020 so he

00:37:22.260 wouldn't get

00:37:22.580 caught with

00:37:23.000 them.

00:37:23.880 Probably

00:37:24.320 that's what

00:37:24.820 killed him.

00:37:26.560 Probably if

00:37:27.400 he had said

00:37:27.800 he had

00:37:28.100 fentanyl in

00:37:28.780 him,

00:37:29.540 that he

00:37:29.880 would have

00:37:30.080 been treated

00:37:30.520 differently.

00:37:31.900 Probably if

00:37:32.640 he said,

00:37:33.080 I think I'm

00:37:33.500 overdosing on

00:37:34.240 fentanyl,

00:37:34.820 he would

00:37:35.080 still be

00:37:35.520 here.

00:37:36.320 So if

00:37:36.680 he hadn't

00:37:37.060 been a

00:37:37.580 criminal,

00:37:38.640 a drug

00:37:39.020 addict,

00:37:39.480 and a

00:37:39.860 liar right

00:37:40.900 until his

00:37:41.260 final breath,

00:37:42.740 he'd probably

00:37:43.160 be alive.

00:37:44.340 That said,

00:37:44.920 it was still

00:37:45.280 a tragedy.

00:37:46.740 Nobody wants

00:37:47.280 to see anybody

00:37:47.960 get killed

00:37:48.600 accidentally or

00:37:50.380 intentionally.

00:37:51.520 It was just

00:37:51.980 a tragedy.

00:37:52.980 And I do

00:37:53.440 think there's

00:37:54.400 a reasonable

00:37:54.860 argument that

00:37:56.240 maybe a

00:37:57.360 police officer

00:37:58.880 in that

00:37:59.220 situation should

00:38:01.400 have known

00:38:01.840 that there

00:38:02.180 was more

00:38:02.520 of a problem

00:38:03.080 than it

00:38:04.180 seemed.

00:38:05.420 And maybe

00:38:05.960 he was

00:38:06.280 playing to

00:38:06.680 the crowd

00:38:07.040 a little

00:38:07.340 too much.

00:38:07.940 Maybe.

00:38:09.220 I think

00:38:10.820 you'd have

00:38:11.140 to be in

00:38:11.480 his head

00:38:11.960 to know

00:38:12.340 what was

00:38:12.660 really

00:38:12.880 happening,

00:38:13.420 and you

00:38:13.640 can't be.

00:38:15.040 So what

00:38:15.540 would be

00:38:15.860 your guess

00:38:16.680 of what

00:38:18.160 would be

00:38:18.580 the outcome

00:38:19.220 of a

00:38:19.700 Supreme

00:38:20.080 Court ruling

00:38:21.000 on this

00:38:21.460 case?

00:38:22.460 Now that

00:38:23.040 the temperature

00:38:23.640 has gone

00:38:24.120 down,

00:38:25.340 and we

00:38:25.660 see how

00:38:26.040 much was

00:38:26.680 propaganda

00:38:28.680 and how

00:38:29.400 much was

00:38:29.840 real.

00:38:32.700 Do you

00:38:33.340 think that

00:38:33.720 the Supreme

00:38:34.200 Court will

00:38:34.920 change it,

00:38:35.960 overturn it?

00:38:36.960 I don't

00:38:37.460 know exactly

00:38:38.060 what basis

00:38:39.180 he's appealing

00:38:39.800 on.

00:38:40.380 Does anybody

00:38:40.960 know upon

00:38:41.600 what basis

00:38:42.300 it's being

00:38:42.780 appealed?

00:38:44.720 What was it

00:38:45.880 that didn't

00:38:46.260 look fair?

00:38:50.860 Some of

00:38:51.580 you...

00:38:52.380 All right.

00:38:55.240 Yeah, we

00:38:55.560 don't know

00:38:55.860 what it was.

00:38:57.680 Oh, was

00:38:58.320 it that the

00:38:58.660 jury was

00:38:59.140 scared?

00:38:59.900 Jury

00:39:00.340 tampering?

00:39:01.620 That's pretty

00:39:02.060 good.

00:39:02.380 That would

00:39:02.700 be a good

00:39:03.060 argument.

00:39:03.700 A good

00:39:04.100 argument would

00:39:04.740 be there

00:39:05.520 wasn't a

00:39:05.980 possibility of

00:39:06.660 a fair

00:39:06.940 trial,

00:39:07.800 because the

00:39:08.460 jurors would

00:39:09.080 be afraid

00:39:09.540 for their

00:39:09.900 own deaths.

00:39:11.420 If you

00:39:12.000 took that

00:39:12.400 to me and

00:39:12.840 I was

00:39:13.080 under the

00:39:13.440 Supreme

00:39:13.700 Court,

00:39:14.500 I'd set

00:39:14.980 them free

00:39:15.380 with that

00:39:17.160 argument.

00:39:18.260 If you

00:39:18.800 made the

00:39:19.120 argument that

00:39:19.760 the jurors

00:39:20.500 could not

00:39:20.940 have possibly

00:39:21.720 been independent

00:39:22.580 as a Supreme

00:39:24.620 Court justice,

00:39:25.140 I wouldn't

00:39:25.660 even have to

00:39:26.120 listen to the

00:39:26.560 argument.

00:39:27.860 Anybody who

00:39:28.440 watched the

00:39:28.840 news knows

00:39:29.520 that the jury

00:39:30.080 couldn't

00:39:30.440 possibly feel

00:39:31.220 safe.

00:39:32.680 They had to

00:39:33.120 live in that

00:39:33.580 town.

00:39:35.420 To me, that

00:39:36.120 would be a

00:39:36.500 slam dunk.

00:39:37.660 It would be

00:39:38.300 obvious evidence

00:39:39.760 that he did not

00:39:40.600 get a fair trial,

00:39:41.240 which doesn't

00:39:42.020 mean he's

00:39:42.340 innocent.

00:39:43.720 You could have

00:39:44.640 an unfair trial

00:39:45.600 independent of

00:39:46.800 whether you're

00:39:47.140 guilty or innocent.

00:39:47.880 But to me,

00:39:49.180 the unfairness

00:39:50.120 of the trial

00:39:50.580 is completely

00:39:52.600 obvious.

00:39:54.220 Completely

00:39:54.700 obvious.

00:39:55.800 There isn't

00:39:56.280 any chance he

00:39:57.160 could have

00:39:57.420 gotten a fair

00:39:57.900 trial in that

00:39:58.860 situation.

00:40:00.000 But again,

00:40:01.020 I'm not saying

00:40:01.680 he was fault

00:40:02.180 free.

00:40:02.900 Not at all.

00:40:04.680 But this

00:40:05.040 could be,

00:40:07.640 this is the

00:40:08.460 sort of case

00:40:08.980 that could

00:40:09.380 determine the

00:40:09.940 presidency.

00:40:12.660 Right?

00:40:13.140 If the

00:40:14.500 conservative

00:40:15.000 court overturns

00:40:17.040 the George

00:40:17.500 Floyd thing,

00:40:18.800 you're not

00:40:20.660 going to get

00:40:20.960 a Republican

00:40:21.440 president.

00:40:23.480 Is that too

00:40:24.280 far?

00:40:25.920 If the

00:40:26.640 George Floyd

00:40:27.200 thing gets

00:40:27.680 overturned

00:40:28.400 before the

00:40:28.960 vote, there

00:40:30.260 will not be

00:40:30.760 a Republican

00:40:31.280 president.

00:40:32.540 Because the

00:40:33.180 country will

00:40:33.640 flip out.

00:40:35.000 It has nothing

00:40:35.580 to do with

00:40:36.060 facts or what's

00:40:37.080 right or wrong.

00:40:38.240 The country

00:40:38.740 would just

00:40:39.120 flip out.

00:40:40.100 You've got

00:40:40.500 one side of

00:40:40.960 the country

00:40:41.300 that's

00:40:42.140 unbalanced.

00:40:44.660 Not all of

00:40:45.520 them, of

00:40:45.860 course.

00:40:47.040 But there

00:40:47.360 are many

00:40:47.640 unbalanced

00:40:48.320 people who

00:40:48.940 would literally

00:40:49.440 cause riots

00:40:50.240 and flip out.

00:40:51.660 And of

00:40:52.020 course, the

00:40:52.760 Democrats would

00:40:54.020 fuel it because

00:40:55.480 it would be

00:40:56.100 good for their

00:40:57.140 voting chances.

00:40:58.680 So yeah, this

00:40:59.820 could be the

00:41:00.280 only thing that

00:41:00.920 matters to the

00:41:01.760 who gets

00:41:02.700 picked president.

00:41:04.560 Could be the

00:41:05.340 only thing that

00:41:05.760 matters.

00:41:07.000 It also might

00:41:07.620 be an

00:41:08.100 advantage for

00:41:11.580 Ramaswamy.

00:41:13.200 Because you

00:41:13.540 want the

00:41:14.900 brownest

00:41:15.520 or Tim

00:41:17.440 Scott.

00:41:17.920 You want

00:41:18.240 the brownest

00:41:18.940 or blackest

00:41:19.800 candidate if

00:41:21.800 you're going to

00:41:22.100 be arguing

00:41:22.560 against George

00:41:23.240 Floyd.

00:41:24.720 If George

00:41:25.640 Floyd, the

00:41:26.760 ghost of

00:41:27.240 George Floyd

00:41:27.900 enters the

00:41:28.800 conversation,

00:41:30.660 you're going to

00:41:31.240 want to have a

00:41:31.760 Tim Scott or

00:41:32.560 a Vague,

00:41:34.780 just to give

00:41:35.320 you a little

00:41:35.860 bit more

00:41:36.280 feeling of

00:41:37.040 cover, even

00:41:38.880 though it's

00:41:39.440 irrelevant.

00:41:39.800 all of this

00:41:41.340 is how you

00:41:41.680 feel about

00:41:42.180 stuff.

00:41:42.580 None of

00:41:42.800 it is

00:41:42.980 logical.

00:41:45.320 All right.

00:41:48.820 Let's see

00:41:49.300 what else

00:41:49.580 has gone on.

00:41:52.020 How many of

00:41:52.660 you saw the

00:41:53.240 former New

00:41:53.800 York Post

00:41:54.200 editor, I

00:41:54.980 think he's

00:41:55.320 that bright

00:41:55.680 bird now,

00:41:57.580 talking about

00:41:58.360 the, I

00:41:59.600 think it was

00:41:59.880 the laptop

00:42:00.320 story that got

00:42:01.100 suppressed, if I

00:42:02.960 have that right.

00:42:03.740 Do my fact

00:42:04.340 checking.

00:42:05.360 And here was

00:42:06.540 the best part

00:42:07.140 about it.

00:42:07.520 So first

00:42:08.220 of all, she

00:42:08.580 did a

00:42:08.960 tremendous job

00:42:10.100 of her

00:42:11.660 public

00:42:12.020 presentation.

00:42:13.160 It was just

00:42:13.740 really strong.

00:42:15.580 My takeaway

00:42:16.700 was, wow,

00:42:17.980 that's a

00:42:18.540 strong person.

00:42:20.460 I was just

00:42:20.920 impressed with

00:42:21.640 her as a

00:42:22.120 person.

00:42:23.420 She had that

00:42:24.740 sort of

00:42:25.780 natural

00:42:26.460 inward

00:42:27.840 strength

00:42:28.560 thing.

00:42:29.780 You know

00:42:30.000 what I mean?

00:42:31.100 Very impressive.

00:42:32.000 Anyway, the

00:42:33.400 best part was

00:42:34.300 that she

00:42:34.640 laughed

00:42:35.340 at the

00:42:38.880 attempts to

00:42:39.720 cover up

00:42:40.160 the story

00:42:40.700 because they

00:42:41.760 were so

00:42:42.280 ridiculous.

00:42:43.920 And you

00:42:44.500 have to hear

00:42:45.020 her laugh

00:42:45.660 because the

00:42:47.320 laugh, I've

00:42:50.000 been telling

00:42:50.380 you, you

00:42:51.740 have to get

00:42:52.220 to the

00:42:52.580 laugh.

00:42:53.880 You have to

00:42:54.440 get to the

00:42:54.780 point where

00:42:55.120 you can

00:42:55.480 mock the

00:42:56.960 ridiculousness

00:42:58.020 of, you

00:43:00.020 know, at

00:43:00.500 least half

00:43:00.880 of the

00:43:01.140 country's

00:43:01.740 actions.

00:43:02.780 And she

00:43:03.420 laughed

00:43:03.840 genuinely.

00:43:05.340 And spontaneously.

00:43:06.780 And she

00:43:07.280 wasn't

00:43:07.700 planning to

00:43:08.280 do it, I

00:43:08.700 don't think.

00:43:09.120 It didn't

00:43:09.400 look planned.

00:43:10.380 It looked

00:43:10.880 like when

00:43:11.300 she thought

00:43:11.820 about it, it

00:43:13.060 was hilarious

00:43:13.760 in retrospect

00:43:14.660 that such a

00:43:16.200 clown show

00:43:16.800 had ever

00:43:17.140 happened.

00:43:18.000 And when

00:43:18.280 you watch

00:43:18.780 a serious

00:43:19.700 person laugh

00:43:21.220 out loud at

00:43:22.080 Congress, and

00:43:23.340 laugh out loud,

00:43:24.560 genuinely laugh,

00:43:26.340 genuinely, and

00:43:27.720 mock the

00:43:28.940 fucked upness

00:43:29.680 of the other

00:43:30.760 side that was

00:43:31.420 suppressing the

00:43:32.320 story, it

00:43:33.600 was a great

00:43:34.300 moment in

00:43:35.640 congressional

00:43:36.160 hearings.

00:43:37.760 It really

00:43:38.520 was great.

00:43:39.980 So RFK

00:43:40.760 Jr.

00:43:41.240 hit it out

00:43:41.940 in the

00:43:42.120 park.

00:43:43.500 But can

00:43:43.920 you give

00:43:44.180 me the

00:43:44.640 name?

00:43:45.480 For some

00:43:46.200 reason, I

00:43:46.740 was looking

00:43:47.140 for her

00:43:47.480 name, and

00:43:47.820 everybody was

00:43:48.420 talking about

00:43:48.940 her as a

00:43:49.380 former New

00:43:49.880 York Post

00:43:50.300 editor.

00:43:51.760 Emma

00:43:52.000 Joe Morris,

00:43:53.460 thank you.

00:43:54.620 Yeah, the

00:43:55.040 news was weird

00:43:55.740 about it.

00:43:56.800 The news

00:43:57.200 was, like,

00:43:57.880 weirdly, at

00:43:59.960 least in the

00:44:00.340 headlines,

00:44:00.740 they were

00:44:00.900 suppressing

00:44:01.260 her name.

00:44:01.640 All right.

00:44:05.560 So more

00:44:06.540 of that, more

00:44:07.620 of that laughing

00:44:08.440 and mocking

00:44:08.960 of things

00:44:09.660 which should

00:44:10.100 be laughed

00:44:10.540 at and

00:44:10.960 mocked,

00:44:11.680 because they

00:44:12.760 are genuinely

00:44:13.280 funny.

00:44:15.120 All right.

00:44:16.360 I would like

00:44:17.280 to give you

00:44:18.760 now the

00:44:20.200 most provocative

00:44:21.040 speculation you'll

00:44:22.280 hear all day.

00:44:24.180 You ready?

00:44:24.800 All right.

00:44:24.880 Attorney General

00:44:30.680 Merrick Garland

00:44:31.780 is the

00:44:33.780 Rosetta Stone

00:44:34.740 that will

00:44:36.940 allow you to

00:44:37.660 figure out

00:44:38.500 who's running

00:44:39.940 the actual

00:44:40.460 country.

00:44:43.360 Now, if you

00:44:44.240 don't know what

00:44:44.560 the Rosetta Stone

00:44:45.320 was, it was

00:44:46.120 an ancient

00:44:46.720 stone that

00:44:47.460 had three

00:44:48.520 different ancient

00:44:49.160 languages of

00:44:51.020 the same

00:44:51.520 message, and

00:44:52.840 because it was

00:44:53.380 the same

00:44:53.720 message, it

00:44:54.300 was three

00:44:54.720 ancient

00:44:55.100 languages, this

00:44:56.580 one stone

00:44:57.360 allowed you

00:44:58.900 to figure out

00:44:59.980 Egyptian

00:45:00.500 hieroglyphics

00:45:01.720 and other

00:45:02.420 stuff.

00:45:03.520 So the

00:45:04.200 Rosetta Stone

00:45:04.820 was the

00:45:05.140 thing that

00:45:05.440 unlocked the

00:45:06.460 language and

00:45:07.460 the understanding

00:45:08.100 of a whole

00:45:08.820 bigger world.

00:45:09.640 world is

00:45:11.900 starting to look

00:45:12.560 like Merrick

00:45:13.140 Garland.

00:45:15.160 And let me

00:45:15.920 tell you why

00:45:16.580 I come to

00:45:17.720 this conclusion.

00:45:20.260 It looks like

00:45:21.420 the DOJ and

00:45:22.920 the FBI are

00:45:23.700 totally dirty.

00:45:25.160 It looks like

00:45:26.140 he was put

00:45:26.640 there because

00:45:27.420 he's part of

00:45:28.340 that.

00:45:29.440 He gives me

00:45:30.380 the impression

00:45:30.900 of someone who

00:45:31.560 is not in

00:45:32.100 charge of

00:45:32.540 himself.

00:45:34.160 Can everybody

00:45:35.020 agree on

00:45:35.500 that?

00:45:35.700 He gives

00:45:37.500 the impression

00:45:38.080 of someone who

00:45:38.940 is not in

00:45:39.480 charge of

00:45:40.200 himself.

00:45:41.640 He does

00:45:42.220 not look like

00:45:42.800 somebody who

00:45:43.320 is strong.

00:45:44.680 He does not

00:45:45.260 look like he

00:45:45.920 comes up with

00:45:46.460 opinions and

00:45:47.140 then he makes

00:45:47.580 everybody agree

00:45:48.360 or tough luck.

00:45:49.960 He looks like

00:45:50.860 a puppet.

00:45:52.260 He has the

00:45:52.720 personality and

00:45:53.720 the presentation

00:45:54.440 of a puppet.

00:45:55.260 Now, was it

00:45:58.960 the Clintons

00:45:59.680 who originally

00:46:00.520 tried, who

00:46:01.420 was it, was

00:46:02.020 it Obama, who

00:46:03.400 tried to get

00:46:03.920 him on the

00:46:04.260 Supreme Court?

00:46:05.800 It was Obama,

00:46:06.700 right?

00:46:07.820 So, who do

00:46:08.780 you try to put

00:46:09.340 on the Supreme

00:46:09.980 Court if you're

00:46:10.640 a Democrat?

00:46:11.680 A puppet.

00:46:12.700 You want

00:46:13.060 somebody who

00:46:13.480 is absolutely

00:46:14.220 definitely going

00:46:14.880 to vote the

00:46:15.280 way you want.

00:46:16.700 Now, I don't

00:46:17.260 know if that's

00:46:17.680 true on the

00:46:18.120 right.

00:46:19.920 Like, Kavanaugh

00:46:20.980 did not come

00:46:21.720 off as a puppet.

00:46:23.380 Did he?

00:46:23.780 He came off

00:46:25.400 as, you

00:46:26.100 know, maybe

00:46:26.460 Republican-y, but

00:46:28.020 he didn't look

00:46:28.400 like a puppet.

00:46:29.880 Gorsuch, you

00:46:30.680 know, no.

00:46:31.660 So, the other

00:46:32.220 ones don't, the

00:46:33.480 other ones never

00:46:34.040 struck me that

00:46:34.820 way.

00:46:35.120 They just don't

00:46:35.580 have that

00:46:35.920 demeanor.

00:46:37.340 But Garlic,

00:46:38.440 uh, Garlic,

00:46:39.540 Merrick Garland,

00:46:41.060 he looks like a

00:46:42.560 puppet.

00:46:44.360 Now, could you

00:46:45.520 understand everything

00:46:46.820 about the

00:46:47.480 allegations about

00:46:48.480 the Bidens that

00:46:49.240 were not being

00:46:49.820 pursued by him

00:46:51.720 being the agent

00:46:52.660 of the deep

00:46:53.140 state?

00:46:53.780 To me, it

00:46:55.180 looks like they

00:46:55.720 put their most

00:46:56.940 trusted puppet in

00:46:58.280 the attorney general

00:46:59.020 job because they

00:47:00.200 know they're all

00:47:00.780 criminals.

00:47:04.040 Right?

00:47:05.100 So, here's what

00:47:06.000 you do.

00:47:06.720 You find out who

00:47:07.560 Garland is closest

00:47:08.680 to in the real

00:47:10.100 world, who's he

00:47:11.340 have dinner with,

00:47:12.680 who's he worked

00:47:13.300 with in the past,

00:47:14.700 you know, what law

00:47:15.280 firm was he in,

00:47:16.660 and you can piece

00:47:17.440 together the entire

00:47:18.500 network of who's

00:47:19.720 actually in charge

00:47:20.520 because they're all

00:47:21.520 going to have some

00:47:22.060 connection that emanates

00:47:23.080 from him.

00:47:24.160 He is the

00:47:24.820 Rosetta Stone of

00:47:25.820 who's actually in

00:47:26.840 charge, and it's

00:47:27.860 not the Bidens.

00:47:30.100 It's clearly not.

00:47:31.620 Do you know why I

00:47:32.160 say it's not the

00:47:32.780 Bidens?

00:47:33.620 I'm not doing that

00:47:34.620 old thing like, oh,

00:47:35.700 Joe Biden is old and

00:47:36.980 he doesn't know where

00:47:37.600 he is.

00:47:38.120 That's not what I'm

00:47:38.900 doing.

00:47:39.100 It has nothing to do

00:47:41.220 with his age,

00:47:42.280 infirmary, or his

00:47:43.160 mental condition.

00:47:46.660 You see what's

00:47:47.560 happening, right?

00:47:49.220 Merrick Garland can

00:47:50.420 put him in fucking

00:47:51.360 jail any time he

00:47:53.380 wants.

00:47:55.200 Merrick Garland is

00:47:56.380 in charge because he

00:47:58.120 can put Biden in

00:47:58.960 jail any time he

00:47:59.980 wants.

00:48:00.860 You know that, right?

00:48:03.080 You know that.

00:48:04.880 You know he can

00:48:05.800 because he's got the

00:48:06.960 goods.

00:48:08.380 But Merrick Garland

00:48:09.780 will not do that.

00:48:10.900 Do you know why?

00:48:12.580 Because Merrick Garland

00:48:13.420 is not in charge of

00:48:14.340 Merrick Garland.

00:48:16.580 It's very unlikely he's

00:48:18.820 in charge of himself.

00:48:20.860 And if he's not in

00:48:21.900 charge of himself, it

00:48:23.320 means somebody controls

00:48:24.440 Garland and Garland

00:48:25.620 controls the Bidens.

00:48:28.100 Because they've known

00:48:29.140 for a long time that

00:48:30.300 Hunter was crooked.

00:48:32.200 In fact, I would go

00:48:33.200 further and say the

00:48:34.200 reason that Biden was

00:48:35.320 chosen is because he

00:48:37.460 was controlled.

00:48:40.000 I believe the only

00:48:41.320 reason Biden was ever

00:48:42.580 a candidate and won is

00:48:44.940 that he's a controlled

00:48:45.960 candidate.

00:48:46.460 So look for Merrick

00:48:48.360 Garland and who he's

00:48:49.400 connected to and that

00:48:50.220 will tell you who's

00:48:50.920 running the country.

00:48:53.320 And no, I'm not joking

00:48:54.500 about any of it.

00:48:56.660 Not joking about any of

00:48:58.220 it.

00:48:59.420 That's the most logical

00:49:00.920 explanation of what we

00:49:02.260 observe.

00:49:03.660 The least logical

00:49:05.000 explanation is that the

00:49:06.700 Democrats thought Biden

00:49:07.880 would be a good

00:49:08.500 president.

00:49:09.960 Am I right?

00:49:12.240 Nobody's buying that.

00:49:13.960 Like they might think

00:49:14.840 that he was good enough

00:49:16.240 to get the job done.

00:49:17.460 But do they really think

00:49:18.460 there was nobody?

00:49:20.480 Do Democrats really

00:49:21.560 believe nobody was

00:49:23.440 qualified by him?

00:49:24.940 He was the one.

00:49:27.280 I doubt it.

00:49:29.260 All right.

00:49:29.480 So you've got a

00:49:30.520 president who's got a

00:49:32.640 criminal rap sheet or,

00:49:35.840 you know, at least

00:49:36.600 allegations a mile long.

00:49:39.300 And it all looks

00:49:40.400 obviously true.

00:49:41.480 To me, it looks all

00:49:43.500 obviously true.

00:49:44.620 The only thing keeping

00:49:45.680 the Bidens out of jail

00:49:47.020 has got to be the

00:49:49.220 attorney general.

00:49:51.840 And I would also argue

00:49:53.200 that the, some member of

00:49:56.240 the, you know, Democrats,

00:49:57.820 they pretty much had to

00:49:59.020 rig the election to make

00:50:00.780 sure they didn't lose.

00:50:02.120 Because if you were a

00:50:03.100 Democrat and you lost,

00:50:03.960 you went to jail.

00:50:05.840 Potentially.

00:50:06.840 Because there were a lot

00:50:07.520 of crimes there, it looks

00:50:08.420 like.

00:50:08.640 So to me, it looks

00:50:10.580 like the most, the most

00:50:13.200 reasonable explanation of

00:50:14.740 what we've seen, and I'll

00:50:17.180 say this as clearly as

00:50:18.220 possible, there is no

00:50:19.880 evidence that I'm aware

00:50:20.980 of that the 2020 election

00:50:22.940 was rigged.

00:50:24.240 I'm not aware of any

00:50:25.400 evidence of that.

00:50:27.100 However, it is the most

00:50:28.780 reasonable, the most

00:50:30.340 reasonable interpretation of

00:50:31.900 everything we've seen is

00:50:32.900 that it was.

00:50:35.080 But no evidence.

00:50:36.220 But, could it be rigged

00:50:39.040 and leave no evidence?

00:50:42.080 Of course.

00:50:44.980 Of course.

00:50:46.320 It's only the idiot media

00:50:47.860 that tells you it's

00:50:48.680 impossible.

00:50:50.000 Oh, there's no way to

00:50:51.360 rig an election.

00:50:52.680 That can't happen.

00:50:55.580 So, you know, I'm not

00:50:57.520 claiming there's any

00:50:58.340 evidence.

00:50:59.380 There's no evidence that

00:51:00.500 I'm aware of.

00:51:01.500 None at all.

00:51:02.720 Zero evidence that I'm

00:51:03.780 aware of.

00:51:04.180 That's, you know, that I

00:51:05.380 would call credible.

00:51:07.740 However, when you look

00:51:09.760 at the totality of the

00:51:11.260 situation, it was a

00:51:13.080 can't-lose situation.

00:51:15.420 In a can't-lose situation,

00:51:17.280 you don't leave it to the

00:51:18.140 voters.

00:51:19.180 Do you?

00:51:20.580 If you thought you

00:51:21.420 could go to jail, if you

00:51:23.740 lost the election, would

00:51:24.780 you leave it to the

00:51:25.500 voters?

00:51:26.220 If you've already, if

00:51:27.220 you're already a criminal.

00:51:28.720 If you're already a

00:51:29.540 criminal, you're going to

00:51:30.240 do the second crime to

00:51:31.320 stay out of jail, for sure.

00:51:32.940 You're not going to say,

00:51:33.680 well, I did that crime,

00:51:35.120 I'm going to go to jail,

00:51:36.360 but I'd hate to do

00:51:37.260 anything illegal to stay

00:51:38.920 out of jail.

00:51:40.300 No.

00:51:42.100 So the most reasonable

00:51:43.600 explanation is that

00:51:45.640 Garland is owned, he's

00:51:49.020 the one who owns Biden,

00:51:50.520 and that somebody else is

00:51:52.600 in charge.

00:51:53.740 Or more, it might be more

00:51:54.940 than one.

00:51:55.560 I mean, it's not

00:51:56.520 necessarily one person.

00:51:57.560 It might be a group of

00:51:59.260 people who have something

00:52:00.840 in common.

00:52:03.520 How do you like my

00:52:04.420 speculation?

00:52:06.800 You loved it because it

00:52:08.020 agrees with what you

00:52:08.820 want to think anyway.

00:52:13.020 If I had to bet on it,

00:52:15.000 gun to head, gun to head,

00:52:17.460 I'd bet it was true.

00:52:21.520 Gun to head, I would bet

00:52:23.100 it's true.

00:52:25.080 But I don't know.

00:52:26.000 And I can't give you

00:52:27.860 any evidence.

00:52:30.160 So, anyway.

00:52:33.620 Let's see what that

00:52:34.460 does.

00:52:36.600 If you're subscribed to

00:52:38.740 the Dilbert Reborn comic,

00:52:40.260 either on Twitter, you can

00:52:41.420 subscribe, see my profile,

00:52:43.280 or you're subscribed on the

00:52:44.900 Locals platform at

00:52:46.180 scottadams.locals.com,

00:52:49.000 you would know that

00:52:49.940 Dilbert is still in an

00:52:51.740 Elbonian jail with the

00:52:53.000 Taint brothers.

00:52:53.860 And today, they're

00:52:56.580 teaching him how to be a

00:52:57.520 man.

00:52:59.900 That's all I'm going to

00:53:00.760 tell you.

00:53:02.260 The Taint brothers are

00:53:03.360 teaching Dilbert how to be

00:53:04.480 a man in jail.

00:53:07.980 So, can't tell you the

00:53:10.120 rest.

00:53:10.920 But you won't see that in

00:53:12.120 newspapers.

00:53:14.780 All right.

00:53:16.220 Ladies and gentlemen,

00:53:18.480 I still have four minutes

00:53:20.520 to go for my hour.

00:53:21.600 Is there any story I

00:53:24.220 missed?

00:53:25.580 You know, I could have

00:53:26.240 spent all day long talking

00:53:27.620 about the hearings, but

00:53:30.300 honestly, it's too

00:53:31.120 complicated.

00:53:32.580 Like, you get into the

00:53:33.860 minutiae so much that it

00:53:36.500 sort of loses its sparkle.

00:53:38.740 Tesla is a humanoid robot.

00:53:47.120 Optimus, Tesla is what?

00:53:50.400 Optimus, Tesla is

00:53:51.920 humanoid robot.

00:53:52.840 Does Tesla have a

00:53:53.840 humanoid robot that we've

00:53:55.920 seen?

00:53:56.880 Is it ready to go?

00:53:59.380 I cannot.

00:54:00.300 Oh, yeah.

00:54:01.320 I guess I missed that

00:54:02.240 story.

00:54:03.180 But how much do you want

00:54:05.880 to have a Tesla robot?

00:54:07.000 Well, I think the first

00:54:08.820 ones are just going to be

00:54:09.600 industrial, right?

00:54:11.160 You know, they're not

00:54:11.680 going to be for the home.

00:54:13.240 I think they just carry

00:54:14.300 heavy boxes in factories

00:54:16.160 and stuff.

00:54:21.760 Now, the reason I

00:54:22.720 discourage Super Chat is

00:54:24.540 not that I don't want

00:54:25.580 your money.

00:54:27.060 It's that it's disruptive

00:54:29.040 to the flow.

00:54:32.060 Dr. Shiva interview,

00:54:33.280 haven't seen it.

00:54:34.000 Why is the media covering

00:54:42.620 them all?

00:54:43.160 Covering what?

00:54:46.020 How long until we have

00:54:47.120 robots building a pyramid?

00:54:48.820 Super pyramid.

00:54:53.380 Oh, Anthony Weiner on the

00:54:56.660 Patrick, Pat, David

00:54:59.880 podcast.

00:55:00.680 How many saw

00:55:01.900 Patrick, Pat, David

00:55:04.140 PDB

00:55:05.420 and Anthony Weiner

00:55:08.580 go off on each other?

00:55:13.540 It was useless.

00:55:15.680 Yeah, nobody

00:55:16.400 I don't think either of them

00:55:18.020 looked good.

00:55:20.420 It was two completely

00:55:21.840 unreasonable people

00:55:22.880 yelling at each other.

00:55:24.360 And neither of them

00:55:25.580 there were no winners.

00:55:27.180 let's just say

00:55:29.160 it didn't look good

00:55:29.920 for either one of them.

00:55:32.240 It would have been

00:55:32.980 really easy

00:55:33.540 to make that

00:55:34.160 a

00:55:35.340 real conversation.

00:55:38.660 Let's call it

00:55:39.180 an RFK Jr.

00:55:40.360 kind of conversation

00:55:41.180 where people are not

00:55:42.520 just yelling at each other.

00:55:45.140 So, yeah,

00:55:45.620 to me

00:55:47.480 that was just

00:55:47.940 worthless.

00:55:51.960 All right.

00:55:53.240 He's usually

00:55:53.840 very composed.

00:55:54.640 He's very composed.

00:55:57.180 This has been

00:56:02.880 AW

00:56:05.200 what?

00:56:10.100 All right.

00:56:10.740 Well,

00:56:11.900 yeah, there were no

00:56:12.660 winners in that.

00:56:14.180 All right.

00:56:17.880 Yeah.

00:56:20.500 Who's the best

00:56:21.380 podcasters now?

00:56:22.420 Who are your favorite

00:56:25.540 let's say political

00:56:26.880 podcasters?

00:56:28.120 Well, me, of course,

00:56:29.580 but not counting me.

00:56:32.580 Show me your favorites,

00:56:34.280 Roseanne.

00:56:37.140 Dave Rubin,

00:56:39.140 Bongino,

00:56:40.780 Pac-Man,

00:56:42.300 Tim Pool,

00:56:44.000 Grinwald,

00:56:45.000 Barnes,

00:56:45.880 Carolla,

00:56:46.300 J-R-E,

00:56:49.560 Shapiro,

00:56:50.580 Levin,

00:56:51.440 Sticks,

00:56:53.100 Kelly.

00:56:54.260 Well, there's quite a

00:56:54.860 few of them.

00:56:55.740 Matt Walsh,

00:56:56.900 Theo,

00:56:58.500 Viva,

00:57:00.660 Jimmy Dore,

00:57:01.440 Dr. Drew,

00:57:03.520 Tim Dillon.

00:57:04.800 Wow.

00:57:04.980 So I asked the other

00:57:07.320 day if somebody

00:57:08.140 would make a sort

00:57:09.540 of a TV

00:57:10.320 viewing schedule

00:57:12.340 that would include

00:57:14.040 those podcasters

00:57:15.120 because a number

00:57:16.120 of us do a show

00:57:17.200 at the same time

00:57:17.940 or the same time

00:57:19.540 every day.

00:57:20.520 Wouldn't you like

00:57:21.060 to see the master

00:57:21.740 list of who

00:57:23.220 is when?

00:57:24.660 Because I don't

00:57:25.100 know where I would

00:57:25.620 go in to get that.

00:57:26.900 But somebody should

00:57:27.520 make that.

00:57:29.220 And it would help

00:57:30.260 because then somebody

00:57:31.280 who comes in with a

00:57:32.060 new show

00:57:32.560 doesn't have to

00:57:34.900 compete if they

00:57:35.740 put it in the

00:57:36.180 right place.

00:57:38.220 There should be

00:57:39.040 an actual TV

00:57:40.880 guide for

00:57:42.080 podcasters

00:57:42.940 and then it just

00:57:44.300 replaces television

00:57:45.300 entirely.

00:57:49.260 All right.

00:57:51.000 Crowder,

00:57:52.360 Joe Rogan,

00:57:53.180 Trigonometry.

00:57:54.460 You know,

00:57:54.760 as the names

00:57:55.320 are going by,

00:57:57.080 it's sorting,

00:57:58.980 it's really

00:57:59.560 sinking in

00:58:00.300 that a number

00:58:02.800 of these

00:58:03.080 podcasts are

00:58:03.780 like broadcast

00:58:04.780 TV, right?

00:58:06.720 Bongino,

00:58:09.060 Greenwald,

00:58:10.200 et cetera.

00:58:10.800 They have

00:58:11.360 old shows.

00:58:12.500 I mean,

00:58:12.660 it's just a

00:58:13.060 whole TV show.

00:58:14.880 And I'm

00:58:17.100 pretty sure

00:58:17.460 they've,

00:58:18.180 yeah,

00:58:18.380 Russell Brand,

00:58:19.120 very high

00:58:19.580 production values.

00:58:22.640 Federalist

00:58:23.040 podcast,

00:58:24.280 all right.

00:58:24.980 Well,

00:58:25.260 somebody needs

00:58:25.700 to put that

00:58:26.080 together and

00:58:26.600 tweet it at

00:58:27.120 me so I

00:58:27.520 can retweet

00:58:28.180 it for you.

00:58:28.620 If you

00:58:30.360 tweet it at

00:58:30.960 me,

00:58:31.180 I'll retweet

00:58:31.720 it.

00:58:31.960 So if

00:58:32.160 somebody wants

00:58:32.620 to take

00:58:33.220 that on,

00:58:34.060 if more

00:58:34.500 than one

00:58:34.800 of you do

00:58:35.200 it,

00:58:35.400 I'll tweet

00:58:36.080 all of them

00:58:36.640 because one

00:58:38.440 of them

00:58:38.660 would be

00:58:38.960 better than

00:58:39.340 the others

00:58:39.640 probably.

00:58:43.180 And then

00:58:43.760 keep it on

00:58:44.380 Eastern Standard

00:58:45.220 Time,

00:58:45.620 I guess.

00:58:46.560 Standardize

00:58:47.000 the time.

00:58:51.040 All right.

00:58:51.640 And Hotel

00:58:51.920 Jesus,

00:58:52.500 yes.

00:58:54.540 Andrew

00:58:54.960 Clavin.

00:58:55.780 Yeah,

00:58:56.040 there's so

00:58:56.360 many of them.

00:58:57.020 There are

00:58:57.260 probably 30

00:59:00.080 podcasts that

00:59:03.120 are quite

00:59:03.860 high quality

00:59:04.560 that you

00:59:05.140 would enjoy

00:59:05.640 in politics

00:59:06.600 and stuff.

00:59:08.200 All right.

00:59:08.480 Oh,

00:59:08.660 Dark House.

00:59:09.360 Yeah,

00:59:09.580 Zuby.

00:59:10.340 There's so

00:59:10.720 many.

00:59:11.400 I got Mark

00:59:13.020 Dice,

00:59:14.640 Tim Dillon.

00:59:15.900 So I did

00:59:16.820 agree to do

00:59:17.540 Roseanne's

00:59:18.420 podcast.

00:59:20.100 Did I tell

00:59:20.640 you all

00:59:20.920 that?

00:59:21.220 I can't

00:59:21.500 remember if

00:59:21.920 I told

00:59:22.200 you.

00:59:22.720 So I'll

00:59:23.460 do Roseanne.

00:59:24.900 We're

00:59:27.160 recording on

00:59:28.060 August 8th

00:59:30.640 or 9th

00:59:31.060 or something.

00:59:31.640 I'll let

00:59:31.940 you know

00:59:32.160 when it

00:59:32.380 gets close.

00:59:35.380 But I

00:59:36.020 don't know

00:59:36.640 yet if it

00:59:37.060 runs live

00:59:38.000 or if it's

00:59:38.520 recorded.

00:59:42.080 Yeah,

00:59:42.620 I never

00:59:43.000 close the

00:59:45.580 circuit with

00:59:46.080 Russell Brand.

00:59:47.220 But when my

00:59:48.300 next book

00:59:49.060 comes out,

00:59:49.840 Reframe Your

00:59:50.320 Brain,

00:59:50.680 which should

00:59:51.020 be out in

00:59:51.300 a few weeks,

00:59:52.420 we're getting

00:59:52.840 very close.

00:59:53.480 all the

00:59:54.100 hard stuff

00:59:54.560 is done.

00:59:55.040 We're just

00:59:55.320 working through

00:59:55.940 some details

00:59:56.580 of getting

00:59:57.600 it listed,

00:59:58.240 et cetera.

00:59:59.140 But once

01:00:00.240 the book

01:00:00.560 is available,

01:00:01.140 I'll do

01:00:01.440 some podcasts.

01:00:02.960 So that's

01:00:03.440 when I'll

01:00:03.740 reach out

01:00:04.140 to people

01:00:04.540 who have

01:00:04.780 asked me

01:00:05.280 in the

01:00:05.520 past,

01:00:06.760 but I

01:00:07.500 was not

01:00:07.900 doing them.

01:00:10.880 So Jordan

01:00:13.720 Peterson had

01:00:15.240 invited me

01:00:15.940 before I

01:00:17.620 got cancelled.

01:00:18.320 I think it

01:00:18.680 was before.

01:00:20.000 I'm not

01:00:20.600 sure he

01:00:20.880 still wants

01:00:21.360 to talk

01:00:21.640 to me,

01:00:21.920 but if

01:00:23.880 anybody

01:00:24.180 wanted to

01:00:24.680 do something

01:00:25.100 dangerous,

01:00:25.700 it would

01:00:25.860 be him.

01:00:28.540 So I'll

01:00:29.180 follow up

01:00:29.680 with Russell

01:00:30.920 Brand,

01:00:31.540 and I'll

01:00:31.780 follow up

01:00:32.220 with Jordan

01:00:34.540 Peterson and

01:00:35.420 some of the

01:00:35.960 other people

01:00:37.060 who would

01:00:37.340 ask me.

01:00:38.220 I think

01:00:38.540 Megyn Kelly

01:00:39.100 asked me

01:00:39.840 at one

01:00:40.060 point,

01:00:40.760 I believe.

01:00:43.000 So yeah,

01:00:43.820 Megyn Kelly,

01:00:44.560 I'll follow up

01:00:45.460 with her as

01:00:45.900 well.

01:00:46.800 Trigonometry,

01:00:47.460 I've never

01:00:47.840 been invited

01:00:48.460 on that.

01:00:49.020 who would

01:00:59.220 be my

01:01:00.500 best podcast

01:01:01.960 combination?

01:01:03.400 I'm thinking

01:01:04.060 it might be

01:01:04.600 Roseanne.

01:01:05.900 That's why I

01:01:06.460 was so quick

01:01:07.040 to say yes.

01:01:08.560 Michael

01:01:08.860 Malice.

01:01:10.700 Okay,

01:01:11.060 there's no way

01:01:12.220 that would be

01:01:12.760 anything but

01:01:13.400 fun.

01:01:14.640 Me and

01:01:15.200 Michael

01:01:15.560 Malice.

01:01:17.360 That would

01:01:17.880 be fun.

01:01:18.160 Greg

01:01:19.000 Gottfeld,

01:01:19.600 always fun,

01:01:20.340 of course.

01:01:22.400 Lex,

01:01:23.320 would I

01:01:23.740 fit with

01:01:24.520 Lex?

01:01:26.420 Do we

01:01:27.040 have the

01:01:27.300 right energy?

01:01:28.980 Tim Ferriss,

01:01:29.600 you're saying?

01:01:30.040 Tim Ferriss

01:01:30.480 would be

01:01:30.720 great.

01:01:32.220 Love Tim

01:01:32.740 Ferriss.

01:01:36.160 Bill

01:01:36.660 Maher.

01:01:39.800 Still,

01:01:40.780 isn't it

01:01:41.260 weird that

01:01:41.860 I haven't

01:01:44.120 been invited

01:01:44.680 to Bill

01:01:45.220 Maher's

01:01:45.700 club,

01:01:47.200 Brandon?

01:01:48.680 I don't

01:01:49.180 know who

01:01:49.800 would be

01:01:50.060 more an

01:01:50.600 ideal person

01:01:51.500 to be on

01:01:51.940 that than

01:01:52.380 me,

01:01:52.740 but oh

01:01:53.620 well.

01:01:56.220 Tim Poole.

01:01:58.420 Yeah,

01:01:58.880 I should

01:01:59.140 talk to

01:02:00.160 Tim.

01:02:02.220 I think

01:02:02.780 his guests

01:02:03.220 have to be

01:02:03.620 in person,

01:02:04.140 right?

01:02:04.920 Does he

01:02:05.300 like most

01:02:05.720 of his

01:02:05.960 guests to

01:02:06.320 be there

01:02:06.600 in person?

01:02:06.940 I might

01:02:08.560 do some

01:02:08.880 traveling,

01:02:09.340 we'll see.

01:02:10.520 Haven't

01:02:10.820 decided.

01:02:11.900 All right,

01:02:12.220 that's all

01:02:12.520 for now.

01:02:13.060 Thanks for

01:02:13.640 joining.

01:02:14.720 And YouTube,

01:02:15.400 I will see

01:02:15.860 you tomorrow.

01:02:16.460 Stay awesome.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - July 21, 2023

Episode 2176 Scott Adams： End Of Wokeness, Media Badness, Whistleblower Goodness, Lots Of Politics

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript