Real Coffee with Scott Adams - July 21, 2023


Episode 2176 Scott Adams: End Of Wokeness, Media Badness, Whistleblower Goodness, Lots Of Politics


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 2 minutes

Words per Minute

137.52722

Word Count

8,569

Sentence Count

693

Misogynist Sentences

8

Hate Speech Sentences

21


Summary

A mayor in Minnesota is telling cops not to arrest people who are high on mushrooms. China is looking like it s a bad idea to invest in the stock market, and a new product that s taking off the market is in trouble.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization and possibly
00:00:11.240 aliens. It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and there's never been a better time. And we got news
00:00:17.460 for you, like news all over the place. You can be saturated with funny, absurd news. It's the best
00:00:23.280 kind. And if you'd like that experience, to go to levels that, well, people say can never be
00:00:29.680 matched. All you need is a cup or mug or a glass, a tank or gel, a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel
00:00:35.460 of any kind. Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled
00:00:41.520 pleasure of the dopamine at the end of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called
00:00:44.520 the simultaneous sip-and-apps. Now, go.
00:00:48.200 Oh. Oh. Well, if you're on Twitter, you should know that I just, just, just now tweeted a clip
00:01:03.240 of me from my man cave explaining how to predict the future of the news using nothing but a Tim
00:01:10.960 Poole hat. Right. And your finger. You'll need a finger and a Tim Poole hat, and you too
00:01:18.320 can predict the future of the news. I just tweeted that if you want to see it. But don't
00:01:24.340 leave. Don't leave. Stay here now. Later, you can go look for that. All right. Apparently,
00:01:32.740 Mayor Jacob Frey or Frey in Minneapolis, he was telling the police to not arrest people
00:01:40.760 who have mushrooms. And I guess everybody is realizing that mushrooms are going to save
00:01:48.080 the world. You're going to fix all your mental illnesses and make you happy. So that's a little
00:01:54.700 sign of goodness. We're going to, we're going to ease into the hard news because we got some
00:02:00.300 hard news. And by hard, I mean funny, but it's still hard, hard and funny. Yeah. I've been
00:02:07.780 described that way, but that's another story. Don't, let's not talk about that. So what else
00:02:14.580 we got going on in Wall Street Journal, James McIntosh, an opinion piece says, well, is it
00:02:22.760 an opinion? I guess it's opinion, that China's lost decade for investors has already happened
00:02:28.080 and hopes for a post-pandemic reopening and a rapid economic recovery are looking bad. So
00:02:36.840 it turns out that investing in China is looking like a bad idea. You're welcome.
00:02:44.580 Well, you know that product that's competing with Twitter? It's called Threads. I don't know
00:02:52.660 if anybody has said this yet, but I'd like to be the first. You know that product Threads?
00:03:00.860 I think it's coming unraveled. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Yeah, it's coming
00:03:09.040 unraveled. I'm pretty sure somebody already said that, but I didn't say it yet.
00:03:14.580 So there's that. So I guess engagement is just tanking and it's looking terrible and
00:03:20.660 all the time spent, basically every metric is in the toilet, big time. Now, as I said
00:03:27.620 before, that doesn't really mean it's dead. That just means that the big launch was sort
00:03:34.000 of not typical of a launch. So they got a bunch of people, but they weren't really people
00:03:38.580 who are necessarily going to stick around. So you shouldn't be surprised if it got a big
00:03:44.420 bump and then went down 70% and then maybe it grows from there. Maybe. I mean, Zuckerberg
00:03:52.020 has the resources to keep it, you know, chunking away until it gets better. So we'll see.
00:03:57.320 Also in the Wall Street Journal, there's an article that says, some activities people
00:04:04.400 associate with happiness, you'll be surprised, but things people associate with happiness like
00:04:10.580 meditating, working out, and spending time in nature lack scientific evidence to prove they
00:04:17.860 lift your spirit. So all of the hundreds of millions of people who have found immediate improvement
00:04:27.060 in their moods from meditating, working out, and spending time in nature, I think you should
00:04:32.740 be a little less happy about it from now on. Because according to the Wall Street Journal,
00:04:37.700 you don't have the scientific backing for your happiness. So if you go for a run and then you
00:04:43.960 find that your mood is instantly improved, probably just an illusion. Get back to your scientific
00:04:50.180 roots and be skeptical. You probably are still angry. And if you meditate and you feel great
00:04:57.020 when you're done, it could be an illusion. It might be an illusion. Science needs to weigh
00:05:02.620 in. Are you really happier? Are you pretending that you're happier and you're just fooling
00:05:07.820 yourself? And then of course, walking in nature, you've all had the experience of walking in nature
00:05:15.460 and it just pisses you off. Am I right? You'll be in an average mood. You take a walk in nature,
00:05:21.240 you're like, ah, screw this nature, it's pissing me off, ah, and you'll be in a bad mood. So what I
00:05:26.920 think is we should take our limited money for science and we should put a lot of it into testing
00:05:34.120 the most obvious fucking things in the world, or you could just go for a run.
00:05:39.780 And you'll feel good. Promise. All right. Just to cause trouble, there's a new service. I don't
00:05:49.180 know where it is because I didn't care. But there's a new service that's advertising that
00:05:54.360 they'll provide you with handy workers, not handy men. No, no, no. No handy men. These are handy
00:06:02.580 workers and they advertise that they will all be female. Well, I think 90% of them will be female,
00:06:09.280 lesbian, and trans. So if you want handy workers or a female, lesbian, and trans only, you can call
00:06:19.560 this company whose name I don't know and I don't know where they're from. But good luck if you can
00:06:25.040 find them. I just have a few things to say about that. None of them are productive, if you know what
00:06:33.140 I mean. Now, I say this before I give you my joke portion of the story. I love the LGBTQ community.
00:06:43.420 There's no such thing as like, I was walking through an LGBT community of high crime.
00:06:50.280 All right? Is there even one high crime neighborhood of LGBTQ people? None. Basically none. One of my
00:07:01.220 favorite groups in America, because they do a good job, basically. But anyway, I cannot help weighing in
00:07:11.260 on the humor of this topic. If you'll forgive me. I wondered what would happen if you called them and
00:07:19.400 asked for a handy worker, but specified that you would only accept a trans. And they'd say,
00:07:26.420 we've got a woman, we can, ooh, but a woman is good. And maybe, maybe this would be a woman, but I'd really
00:07:34.220 need trans. I really need trans. And they'd say, we also have a lesbian. We can send a lesbian right
00:07:41.660 over. And I'd say, lesbian is great. That's great. But lesbian feels a little 1990s? Can I say that?
00:07:51.480 It feels a little dated? I mean, I need something with a little more, a little more edge. Can you give
00:07:59.260 me a trans? And then they're going to say, which direction? And then everything goes off the rails
00:08:09.880 at that point. Which kind of trans? Yeah, it all gets bad after that. But the funniest sexist comment
00:08:18.540 that I saw was from, on Twitter, somebody named Mike. And Mike said, this is so sexist. It's hilarious.
00:08:28.140 All right. If we could just, if we could just be, you know, like human for a moment and just,
00:08:35.500 and just enjoy what a, what a dick comment this is. It's funny because he's being a dick. All right.
00:08:43.460 So, so if you know that, then, then I think you can do it. So Mike says, don't know. I feel like I
00:08:50.020 would want to pay to see that circus. After making sure, after making sure they are insured, ha ha,
00:08:57.320 I would even bring out the popcorn maker. Ha ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha.
00:09:08.460 Oh, Mike, you're such a dick. Oh, I disavow you so, so hard. All right. Well, while we're on the topic,
00:09:21.220 as long as we're being offensive.
00:09:26.180 Let's do a little bit more, shall we?
00:09:30.740 All right, today I learned on Twitter
00:09:32.540 from Twitter user FisherKing.
00:09:37.040 He tweeted,
00:09:37.840 Did you know they just had the women's...
00:09:41.320 Did you know they just had the women's world chess championship?
00:09:51.220 And FisherKing says,
00:09:52.600 Neither did anyone else.
00:09:54.280 And he says,
00:09:54.900 Ask yourself why there's even such a thing.
00:09:57.560 It's not tennis or MMA.
00:10:02.580 Is it just me?
00:10:03.920 Or is it hilarious that there's a women's only chess?
00:10:09.740 Is that in case somebody can't move the pieces?
00:10:13.080 It's like,
00:10:14.060 All right, I'm going to move...
00:10:16.920 I think I'll move a pawn to...
00:10:21.920 Can you help me move this chess piece over here?
00:10:30.640 I need a little more muscle on this.
00:10:35.460 Anyway, meanwhile,
00:10:37.700 while we watch the hilarious death of wokeness all over,
00:10:43.660 DeSantis said he's kneecapping ESG in Florida.
00:10:48.000 And he's going after,
00:10:49.160 I guess there's some...
00:10:49.980 So the parent company for Bud Light,
00:10:57.340 you all know the Bud Light story.
00:10:59.980 I guess there's some government,
00:11:01.520 there's some Florida entity
00:11:02.620 that still has an investment in him.
00:11:04.120 So he's trying to cut that out.
00:11:06.640 But he's kneecapping ESG.
00:11:09.820 So there's that.
00:11:11.840 So at the same time,
00:11:12.760 he's kneecapping ESG.
00:11:15.000 And you've got the head of BlackRock,
00:11:17.880 Larry Fink,
00:11:19.020 saying that ESG has become a sort of a dirty word.
00:11:22.840 And then we're seeing,
00:11:24.860 skipping ahead a little bit,
00:11:27.120 there's a bunch of DEI professionals
00:11:30.560 getting fired lately.
00:11:31.680 So the Wall Street Journal is saying
00:11:35.160 that these are companies
00:11:37.640 that have gotten rid of DEI employees lately.
00:11:41.240 Netflix, Disney, Warner Brothers, Discovery.
00:11:46.920 I have high-profile people leaving.
00:11:50.000 And now here's sort of a summary of that.
00:11:54.660 They're in the crosshairs, so to speak,
00:11:57.280 because of all the reasons.
00:11:59.560 Basically, none of it's working.
00:12:03.160 And the reporting is
00:12:04.840 that the executives
00:12:06.420 who brought in all these DEI people
00:12:08.620 were just trying to look good,
00:12:11.140 and nothing good came from it.
00:12:13.020 It just caused them more work, apparently.
00:12:15.680 So yeah, there's a woke purge.
00:12:17.960 So ESG is failing.
00:12:20.200 DEI is scaling down.
00:12:22.840 And we have at least three,
00:12:26.440 you can give me the real number,
00:12:27.960 but there's at least three
00:12:29.160 major Republican candidates
00:12:31.920 who want to get rid of all ESG and DEI.
00:12:36.260 Am I right?
00:12:38.020 Three major candidates.
00:12:39.620 But I think it might be all of them.
00:12:41.480 So I might be undercounting.
00:12:42.760 I think it might be,
00:12:44.340 do all of the Republican candidates
00:12:46.040 say they want to get rid of all that stuff?
00:12:48.300 All the racism?
00:12:49.180 So that's pretty good.
00:12:53.060 It sounds terrible
00:12:54.580 that I have to be happy
00:12:55.940 that there are major candidates
00:12:57.880 for president
00:12:58.520 who are opposed to racism.
00:13:01.780 I guess that's good.
00:13:04.360 It's like you have to say it now.
00:13:06.260 They're actually opposed to racism.
00:13:08.240 Okay, good.
00:13:10.860 That's a step forward.
00:13:13.460 All right.
00:13:13.900 I guess we're going to have to talk about
00:13:16.800 all of the scandals.
00:13:19.420 So we've got some Biden scandals.
00:13:21.960 We've got some Trump scandals.
00:13:23.880 And I don't know about you,
00:13:25.300 but I'm starting to mix up
00:13:27.260 all of the Biden scandal stories.
00:13:30.940 Is anybody having that,
00:13:32.020 like, they're all starting to sound
00:13:33.380 too much alike.
00:13:34.620 And then all of the Trump legal problems
00:13:37.680 as well.
00:13:38.920 They're all starting to emerge in my mind.
00:13:40.980 I can't tell which is which.
00:13:42.160 But can you help me out
00:13:44.060 and see if I've forgotten anything?
00:13:46.280 All right.
00:13:46.920 So my understanding is
00:13:48.260 that the Hunter Biden
00:13:50.240 and his father,
00:13:52.440 the big guy,
00:13:53.700 have the following three legal problems.
00:13:57.580 Can you give me a fact check on this?
00:13:59.880 So one of them is
00:14:00.980 the whistleblowers say that
00:14:03.140 the FBI, I think,
00:14:06.340 was slow walking the investigation
00:14:07.940 into Hunter's tax returns.
00:14:10.600 Is that correct?
00:14:11.280 So number one
00:14:13.180 is whistleblowers,
00:14:15.120 very credible ones,
00:14:16.380 say the entire government
00:14:17.780 was basically
00:14:20.440 just not doing their job
00:14:21.880 intentionally
00:14:22.480 to protect Hunter.
00:14:24.900 Second one was the FBI.
00:14:27.940 Now we knew that,
00:14:29.380 we now know that the FBI knew
00:14:31.240 the laptops were real,
00:14:34.680 or the one laptop.
00:14:36.160 So apparently the FBI
00:14:37.380 knew it was real
00:14:38.520 and told the public
00:14:39.960 it wasn't.
00:14:41.580 So that's new, right?
00:14:43.080 Now we know that,
00:14:44.000 that's documented now,
00:14:45.180 so we're not guessing anymore.
00:14:47.160 It's now documented
00:14:48.080 that they knew
00:14:48.820 and they decided to lie.
00:14:52.000 So that's new.
00:14:53.160 And now the third one
00:14:54.660 is this so-called 1023 form,
00:14:57.360 which is what is used
00:14:58.940 to interview people.
00:14:59.800 And there is a witness,
00:15:02.200 or maybe more than one,
00:15:03.980 give me a fact check,
00:15:05.440 is it just one witness,
00:15:06.700 who makes some claims
00:15:08.480 about money from Burisma
00:15:11.000 going to the Bidens
00:15:13.840 and going through a series
00:15:15.560 of concealing accounts
00:15:18.060 and corporate shelves
00:15:19.060 and banks and stuff like that.
00:15:20.760 And even an alleged,
00:15:24.960 alleged statement
00:15:28.520 that the reason
00:15:29.280 they set up this whole labyrinth
00:15:32.340 was to conceal the payments
00:15:33.980 and that they were expecting
00:15:36.180 that the Bidens
00:15:37.040 would help them out
00:15:37.900 getting rid of the prosecutor,
00:15:40.620 which happened.
00:15:41.900 But we don't know
00:15:42.520 if it's because of that,
00:15:44.200 but that's what allegedly
00:15:46.360 they were hoping for,
00:15:48.020 but actually did happen.
00:15:49.760 Now, all of this stuff
00:15:53.360 on that so-called
00:15:54.200 again, fact check me
00:15:57.380 if I'm wrong,
00:15:58.740 is dependent on audio recordings
00:16:02.260 and maybe other documentation
00:16:04.840 that we have not seen.
00:16:07.680 So that basically
00:16:08.620 the only backing
00:16:11.780 for that 1023
00:16:13.580 is just the people
00:16:15.780 who were interviewed, right?
00:16:18.260 Is that true?
00:16:18.880 So could it be said
00:16:20.640 that the 1023
00:16:21.560 could be
00:16:22.480 just another Steele dossier?
00:16:25.440 Is there anything
00:16:26.300 that would rule out
00:16:27.380 the 1023 being fake?
00:16:32.020 Has anything ruled that out?
00:16:34.300 Now, the part we know
00:16:35.420 is there appear
00:16:36.700 to be bank records.
00:16:37.800 Yes, there appear
00:16:38.380 to be bank records.
00:16:39.760 But there could be
00:16:41.180 bank records
00:16:41.940 and shell companies
00:16:43.140 for more than one reason.
00:16:45.320 None of them are good.
00:16:46.340 I don't think there's
00:16:48.520 any legal,
00:16:49.320 legitimate reason
00:16:50.000 to have all those
00:16:50.820 shell companies.
00:16:51.820 We all agree on that, right?
00:16:53.600 Whatever all that
00:16:54.800 labyrinth of financial confusion
00:16:57.700 was about,
00:16:58.960 it definitely wasn't
00:17:00.120 about anything legal.
00:17:02.280 We all know that, right?
00:17:04.660 So that's not even
00:17:06.020 a dispute,
00:17:07.200 I think.
00:17:08.100 I doubt anybody
00:17:08.960 would argue it.
00:17:09.620 But you still need
00:17:11.680 the actual crime
00:17:12.580 just because somebody
00:17:14.600 set up a structure
00:17:15.580 that you would only
00:17:17.560 set up for crime
00:17:18.680 and money actually
00:17:20.180 flew through it
00:17:20.960 exactly like you would
00:17:23.000 for crime,
00:17:23.700 money laundering
00:17:24.360 or at least hiding it
00:17:25.320 from the IRS.
00:17:27.080 And however,
00:17:29.720 if we don't actually have
00:17:31.660 backup for that 1023
00:17:33.840 beyond the financial records,
00:17:36.520 is it going to hold?
00:17:37.540 Do you think that's a,
00:17:40.500 do you think that that could,
00:17:41.980 I don't think it will.
00:17:44.020 I think it's just short
00:17:45.680 of being enough.
00:17:47.740 But I'm not positive.
00:17:49.560 Because, you know,
00:17:50.160 it's not my domain
00:17:50.940 and there'll be lots more
00:17:51.880 we'll find out.
00:17:52.980 But,
00:17:53.920 to me it looks just short.
00:17:57.480 Just short of being,
00:17:59.600 now I'm not saying
00:18:00.460 it's not true.
00:18:02.160 I want to make sure
00:18:03.080 that I'm saying it correctly.
00:18:04.740 I'm not saying
00:18:05.420 that the allegations
00:18:06.160 are untrue.
00:18:07.540 I'm saying that
00:18:08.500 in terms of a court case
00:18:10.460 or, you know,
00:18:11.200 really proving it,
00:18:13.160 it feels like
00:18:13.940 it's just,
00:18:14.580 just lacking.
00:18:16.520 So,
00:18:17.220 we have not ruled out
00:18:19.000 that it's just
00:18:19.540 another Steele dossier.
00:18:21.600 It could actually be
00:18:22.620 Russian disinformation.
00:18:25.100 Like, actually,
00:18:26.080 literally it could be.
00:18:27.500 In the real world,
00:18:28.680 actually,
00:18:29.140 literally this time,
00:18:29.960 it could be
00:18:30.500 Russian disinformation.
00:18:31.560 But what's funny
00:18:33.180 about it
00:18:33.680 is that the Democrats
00:18:36.620 can't use that excuse again,
00:18:38.720 even if it's real.
00:18:40.600 You'd just be laughed at.
00:18:42.340 Oh,
00:18:42.660 it's Russian disinformation again.
00:18:45.300 Isn't that convenient?
00:18:47.300 Which does open up
00:18:48.380 an opportunity
00:18:48.940 for some Russian disinformation
00:18:50.400 if Putin's paying attention.
00:18:53.040 All right,
00:18:54.780 so then Trump
00:18:55.360 is in trouble for,
00:18:56.960 we'll get back
00:18:57.700 to the 1023 thing,
00:18:59.340 he's in trouble
00:19:00.000 for his boxes,
00:19:01.940 right?
00:19:02.920 He's in trouble
00:19:03.880 for inciting
00:19:07.100 J6 stuff,
00:19:08.280 there's some charges
00:19:09.360 that are going to come
00:19:09.960 from that.
00:19:11.720 And is he still
00:19:12.780 in trouble
00:19:13.220 in Georgia
00:19:13.940 for the find the votes
00:19:15.260 phone call?
00:19:15.860 Is that still alive?
00:19:18.100 That's yes.
00:19:19.020 And then there's
00:19:19.860 that F. Gene Carroll thing,
00:19:22.020 but that's civil.
00:19:26.520 So does it look
00:19:27.460 like a tie?
00:19:29.520 Does it look like
00:19:30.480 the two main candidates
00:19:31.760 for president
00:19:32.420 have three scandals apiece?
00:19:35.560 Maybe more?
00:19:37.440 Well,
00:19:37.700 they all have three and a half
00:19:38.840 because they both
00:19:39.420 have a sex accusation.
00:19:42.140 So three and a half
00:19:42.940 scandals apiece?
00:19:44.220 I put the sex scandals
00:19:45.720 as just one scandal.
00:19:49.260 All right,
00:19:49.820 well,
00:19:50.640 so that's out of a tie.
00:19:51.820 Now,
00:19:52.020 what do you think
00:19:52.460 the public is going
00:19:53.460 to make of all this?
00:19:56.020 So,
00:19:56.520 you know,
00:19:56.880 I watch the news
00:19:58.100 and you probably
00:19:59.340 have this experience too.
00:20:00.760 I'll watch the news
00:20:01.660 and it'll be the major
00:20:02.500 headline story
00:20:03.300 for like days
00:20:04.060 and it won't be
00:20:05.380 that difficult
00:20:05.980 to understand.
00:20:07.580 And I'll think,
00:20:08.140 well,
00:20:08.300 surely everybody's
00:20:09.140 heard this story.
00:20:10.420 And the very first person
00:20:12.080 I meet outside
00:20:12.980 of my own house,
00:20:14.660 you know,
00:20:14.860 just run into
00:20:15.460 somebody,
00:20:16.320 haven't seen them
00:20:16.900 in a while,
00:20:17.820 and politics comes up.
00:20:20.160 They haven't heard
00:20:20.920 any of these stories.
00:20:22.500 The average person
00:20:23.460 isn't watching
00:20:24.040 any news
00:20:24.760 at all.
00:20:26.060 No news at all.
00:20:28.160 They're just not
00:20:28.880 watching anything.
00:20:30.120 So what happens
00:20:30.900 when you take
00:20:31.540 not just regular news
00:20:33.340 that they're not watching,
00:20:35.000 most of the country,
00:20:36.760 but what happens
00:20:37.600 if it's a really
00:20:38.700 complicated legal thing
00:20:40.060 where even the lawyers
00:20:40.900 can't figure out
00:20:41.600 what's true?
00:20:42.060 I'm not sure
00:20:44.140 it affects the election.
00:20:46.600 I think the level
00:20:47.620 of confusion
00:20:48.320 about all this stuff
00:20:49.200 is so great
00:20:49.920 that the voters
00:20:51.520 are just going to go,
00:20:52.440 I don't know,
00:20:52.940 it looks like two people
00:20:53.860 with legal problems.
00:20:55.480 I call it a tie.
00:20:57.240 It's going to look
00:20:57.960 like a tie.
00:21:00.420 Unless one of them
00:21:01.200 is in jail,
00:21:02.020 it's going to look
00:21:02.760 like a tie.
00:21:04.020 Now,
00:21:04.440 that doesn't mean
00:21:04.940 it is.
00:21:06.020 It's just that the public
00:21:07.040 won't be able
00:21:07.580 to sort it out.
00:21:08.320 It'll be too complicated.
00:21:10.820 All right.
00:21:13.640 So the 1023 story
00:21:16.920 is that there were
00:21:17.600 payments made
00:21:18.220 to the Bidens
00:21:18.880 for getting
00:21:21.980 a prosecutor fired.
00:21:23.860 Biden has bragged
00:21:25.760 in public
00:21:26.200 that he got
00:21:26.760 that guy fired,
00:21:28.640 but said the reason
00:21:29.540 was because he was
00:21:31.500 crooked
00:21:31.860 and everybody
00:21:32.740 wanted him fired,
00:21:34.120 which might be true.
00:21:35.000 I don't know
00:21:36.700 what's true
00:21:37.140 over there.
00:21:38.320 I just figure
00:21:39.020 everybody's lying
00:21:39.680 about everything.
00:21:40.660 If it's Ukraine,
00:21:42.340 everybody's lying
00:21:43.000 about everything.
00:21:44.840 So,
00:21:45.400 we'll see
00:21:46.540 if any of that
00:21:47.180 turns out
00:21:49.180 to be true.
00:21:52.520 Jonathan Turley
00:21:53.360 is pointing out
00:21:54.020 that NBC
00:21:54.560 is trying to cover
00:21:55.440 for the Bidens
00:21:56.240 by calling
00:21:56.940 the whistleblower
00:21:57.820 the IRS whistleblower.
00:22:01.420 Actually,
00:22:02.020 two of them,
00:22:03.280 two whistleblowers
00:22:04.240 who confirm
00:22:05.900 each other's story,
00:22:06.780 it's the most
00:22:07.700 credible thing
00:22:08.440 you could ever
00:22:08.920 see.
00:22:09.760 They're the most
00:22:10.380 classic
00:22:11.180 exact examples
00:22:14.140 of government
00:22:14.920 whistleblowers.
00:22:17.060 And what does
00:22:17.560 NBC call them?
00:22:19.300 So-called whistleblowers.
00:22:21.440 So-called whistleblowers.
00:22:22.840 I guess the so-called
00:22:25.520 whistleblowers
00:22:26.220 were at the
00:22:28.380 so-called hearing
00:22:29.660 at the so-called
00:22:30.420 Congress
00:22:30.960 in the so-called
00:22:33.380 United States
00:22:34.260 in the so-called
00:22:36.440 earlier part
00:22:37.780 of the week.
00:22:40.580 Yep,
00:22:41.440 that really
00:22:42.000 happened.
00:22:43.520 Scarborough,
00:22:44.040 what's his first
00:22:46.360 name?
00:22:47.580 Scarborough
00:22:48.020 Joe.
00:22:51.620 Yeah.
00:22:52.200 Morning Joe.
00:22:53.420 Yeah,
00:22:53.700 I should remember
00:22:54.380 that.
00:22:55.360 Scarborough says
00:22:56.080 we have these
00:22:57.580 so-called
00:22:58.040 whistleblowers.
00:23:00.720 And he says
00:23:01.140 it's a
00:23:01.580 I'm out of my
00:23:05.860 asthma meds.
00:23:09.500 So it's going to
00:23:10.180 be tough to get
00:23:10.720 through the show
00:23:11.160 actually.
00:23:12.740 He says
00:23:13.020 this is a clown show
00:23:13.840 with the House
00:23:14.760 Republicans.
00:23:16.100 It's just a clown show.
00:23:18.080 All right.
00:23:20.020 There was
00:23:20.720 this censorship
00:23:21.580 hearing
00:23:22.880 yesterday.
00:23:25.440 And
00:23:25.520 RFK Jr.
00:23:28.900 was one of
00:23:29.880 the main
00:23:30.780 people testifying.
00:23:33.260 And believe it
00:23:33.940 or not,
00:23:34.500 this sounds like
00:23:35.060 a joke,
00:23:36.420 the Democrats
00:23:37.180 tried to censor
00:23:38.440 him so that we
00:23:39.260 couldn't see the
00:23:39.900 hearing.
00:23:40.720 So it'd be a
00:23:41.540 secret hearing.
00:23:43.020 That actually
00:23:44.160 happened.
00:23:46.080 Can you believe
00:23:46.960 that?
00:23:47.720 It was actually
00:23:48.760 a censorship
00:23:49.400 hearing,
00:23:50.560 government
00:23:51.060 censorship,
00:23:52.180 and the
00:23:52.760 government,
00:23:53.580 the Democrats,
00:23:55.180 tried to have
00:23:55.760 it censored.
00:23:56.760 I'm not making
00:23:57.680 that up.
00:23:58.980 I'm not making
00:23:59.860 that up.
00:24:00.660 That's a real
00:24:01.500 thing that happened.
00:24:02.900 And they didn't
00:24:03.680 even hide it.
00:24:05.020 They didn't even
00:24:05.660 hide it.
00:24:06.500 It was just
00:24:06.920 completely open.
00:24:07.640 Let's censor
00:24:09.560 this guy who
00:24:10.160 wants to talk
00:24:10.700 about censorship.
00:24:13.940 Again,
00:24:14.800 if the public
00:24:16.240 were paying
00:24:16.880 attention,
00:24:18.100 that would
00:24:18.820 probably be
00:24:19.380 pretty bad
00:24:19.940 for Democrats.
00:24:21.440 But I don't
00:24:21.980 think they are,
00:24:22.740 plus it's
00:24:23.200 summer.
00:24:24.020 Nobody believes
00:24:24.960 any summer
00:24:25.400 stories anyway,
00:24:26.700 or they
00:24:27.440 shouldn't.
00:24:30.000 But,
00:24:30.440 so RFK Jr.
00:24:32.700 did something
00:24:33.140 awesome.
00:24:33.600 Everybody's
00:24:33.960 heard about it
00:24:34.400 by now.
00:24:34.720 he had some
00:24:36.580 opening statements
00:24:37.500 prepared.
00:24:39.000 But he did
00:24:40.000 that dramatic
00:24:40.620 thing where
00:24:41.200 he sets them
00:24:41.980 aside.
00:24:43.480 And then he
00:24:44.000 goes off on
00:24:44.780 probably the
00:24:48.500 most impressive
00:24:49.540 extemporaneous
00:24:51.000 speech you
00:24:53.080 might ever see
00:24:53.680 in your life.
00:24:55.080 It was
00:24:55.360 actually,
00:24:55.980 it was just,
00:24:57.260 it was mind
00:24:57.820 blowingly
00:24:58.360 amazing.
00:25:00.680 And he did
00:25:01.540 it with his,
00:25:02.320 you know,
00:25:03.380 his speech
00:25:04.020 issues.
00:25:05.680 And I gotta
00:25:06.200 say,
00:25:07.700 every time
00:25:08.680 he does
00:25:09.180 this thing,
00:25:11.680 it's
00:25:13.740 impressive.
00:25:14.900 He makes
00:25:15.520 you listen
00:25:16.060 to something
00:25:16.640 you don't
00:25:17.020 want to
00:25:17.280 listen to,
00:25:17.880 if I can
00:25:18.300 be frank
00:25:19.080 about it.
00:25:19.660 You don't
00:25:20.100 want to
00:25:20.340 hear his
00:25:20.660 voice,
00:25:21.940 but if
00:25:22.900 you take
00:25:23.820 a minute
00:25:24.320 of it,
00:25:25.060 if you
00:25:25.340 listen to
00:25:25.740 the first
00:25:26.120 minute,
00:25:26.880 you'll be
00:25:27.260 hooked.
00:25:28.480 And you'll
00:25:29.080 stay for
00:25:29.480 ten minutes,
00:25:30.420 and you'll
00:25:30.780 be glad you
00:25:31.340 did.
00:25:32.080 And when
00:25:32.400 you're done,
00:25:32.880 you're gonna
00:25:33.140 say,
00:25:34.260 damn,
00:25:34.720 we got
00:25:36.620 some good
00:25:37.100 people running
00:25:37.680 for president.
00:25:40.200 He might
00:25:40.860 not be your
00:25:41.340 choice,
00:25:41.940 I get it,
00:25:42.680 policy-wise,
00:25:43.700 but he is
00:25:45.040 really impressive,
00:25:46.460 right?
00:25:47.140 We've got,
00:25:47.800 you know,
00:25:48.020 now we've got
00:25:48.560 Vivek,
00:25:49.400 impressive as
00:25:50.160 hell.
00:25:51.280 You know,
00:25:51.560 people like
00:25:52.020 Trump,
00:25:52.360 I think
00:25:52.620 DeSantis is
00:25:53.340 solid in
00:25:53.840 his own
00:25:54.120 way.
00:25:56.180 We have
00:25:56.800 really good
00:25:57.400 candidates,
00:25:58.800 really good
00:25:59.440 candidates.
00:26:00.180 Joe Biden
00:26:00.620 is not one
00:26:01.200 of them,
00:26:01.900 but we
00:26:02.180 really do,
00:26:02.940 you should
00:26:03.380 be really
00:26:03.760 happy about
00:26:04.300 that.
00:26:05.340 In my
00:26:05.940 opinion,
00:26:06.480 this is the
00:26:06.960 best field
00:26:07.440 of candidates
00:26:08.040 we've ever
00:26:08.580 seen.
00:26:10.360 And I
00:26:10.640 don't think
00:26:10.980 there was,
00:26:11.580 you know,
00:26:11.760 name another
00:26:12.260 candidate who
00:26:13.520 could have
00:26:13.840 done what
00:26:14.220 RFK Jr.
00:26:15.040 did.
00:26:16.100 And by
00:26:16.540 the way,
00:26:16.760 you should
00:26:17.000 listen to
00:26:17.480 it.
00:26:17.600 If I
00:26:18.560 tried to
00:26:18.960 characterize
00:26:19.400 it,
00:26:20.440 it would
00:26:21.460 lose all
00:26:22.220 of its
00:26:22.500 steam.
00:26:23.140 But the
00:26:23.420 basic idea
00:26:24.100 is he
00:26:24.380 talks about
00:26:25.020 the degree
00:26:26.640 to which he
00:26:27.180 was personally
00:26:28.040 censored.
00:26:29.120 And I
00:26:30.240 was not
00:26:30.660 aware.
00:26:31.560 I was not
00:26:32.160 aware of
00:26:32.540 how overtly
00:26:33.480 political it
00:26:34.180 was.
00:26:35.880 I thought it
00:26:36.580 was just a
00:26:37.020 lot of
00:26:37.220 people thought
00:26:37.700 he was
00:26:37.940 nuts,
00:26:38.880 so they
00:26:39.140 were just
00:26:39.460 sort of
00:26:40.180 acting
00:26:40.500 accordingly.
00:26:41.540 But no,
00:26:41.960 it looked
00:26:42.220 pretty organized.
00:26:43.660 And it
00:26:43.980 looked like
00:26:44.300 the timing
00:26:44.800 was not
00:26:45.820 coincidental,
00:26:46.600 and it
00:26:46.760 looked like
00:26:47.080 it was
00:26:47.300 entirely
00:26:47.820 political.
00:26:49.060 It was
00:26:49.480 actually
00:26:49.820 political
00:26:50.320 censorship.
00:26:52.260 And it
00:26:52.720 was jaw-dropping
00:26:54.160 to hear the
00:26:54.620 evidence,
00:26:55.920 but it
00:26:56.680 was also
00:26:57.240 inspirational
00:26:58.040 to hear
00:26:59.900 a Kennedy
00:27:00.560 speaking in
00:27:01.780 a Kennedy-esque
00:27:02.860 style.
00:27:04.160 And the
00:27:04.640 beauty is you
00:27:05.220 can say that
00:27:06.160 he was speaking
00:27:06.660 in a Kennedy-esque
00:27:07.720 style, and
00:27:09.140 it's not like
00:27:09.900 an analogy or
00:27:10.640 anything.
00:27:11.500 He's a
00:27:11.960 Kennedy.
00:27:13.500 Apparently they
00:27:14.260 learned that at
00:27:14.860 birth or
00:27:15.260 something.
00:27:15.860 They learned
00:27:16.260 how to talk
00:27:16.700 that way.
00:27:17.480 That was
00:27:17.840 just impressive.
00:27:18.860 So I
00:27:19.140 recommend it.
00:27:20.120 I recommend
00:27:20.880 it if you
00:27:21.260 just want to
00:27:21.680 feel good
00:27:22.040 about the
00:27:22.380 country.
00:27:23.540 If you
00:27:24.080 just want
00:27:24.420 to feel
00:27:24.800 good about
00:27:26.240 being an
00:27:26.640 American for
00:27:27.360 like 10
00:27:27.860 minutes,
00:27:29.040 just listen
00:27:29.560 to RFK
00:27:30.100 Jr.
00:27:30.520 talk about
00:27:31.120 America,
00:27:32.640 what it
00:27:32.980 should be
00:27:33.320 and what
00:27:33.600 it isn't.
00:27:36.280 So good
00:27:37.020 on him.
00:27:38.520 By the
00:27:39.000 way, I
00:27:39.420 absolutely
00:27:39.940 love that
00:27:41.300 I can say
00:27:41.860 unambiguously
00:27:42.680 positive things
00:27:43.660 about somebody
00:27:44.400 whose policies
00:27:47.040 don't line up
00:27:47.860 with mine
00:27:48.200 exactly.
00:27:49.940 I love
00:27:50.560 that.
00:27:51.720 I like
00:27:52.340 that I
00:27:52.600 can just
00:27:52.900 treat him
00:27:53.200 with respect
00:27:53.880 and that
00:27:54.400 that could
00:27:54.700 be the
00:27:54.960 end of
00:27:55.220 the
00:27:55.320 conversation.
00:27:55.940 We
00:27:56.380 just
00:27:56.600 disagree
00:27:56.960 on a
00:27:57.200 few
00:27:57.280 things.
00:27:58.980 All
00:27:59.060 right.
00:28:01.400 There's a
00:28:02.000 story that
00:28:02.440 Vivek
00:28:03.140 Ramaswamy
00:28:03.880 has beaten
00:28:04.760 DeSantis
00:28:05.320 in some
00:28:06.520 Kaplan
00:28:07.440 strategies
00:28:08.120 poll that
00:28:09.000 most people
00:28:09.760 who don't
00:28:11.360 like the
00:28:11.700 result are
00:28:12.260 saying there's
00:28:12.860 a BS
00:28:13.480 poll and
00:28:14.160 you should
00:28:14.420 not believe
00:28:14.900 it.
00:28:15.460 So I
00:28:15.860 don't believe
00:28:16.220 polls in
00:28:16.660 general at
00:28:17.100 this point,
00:28:17.820 but it's
00:28:19.520 the story.
00:28:21.380 So although
00:28:22.200 the polling
00:28:22.920 entity may
00:28:25.320 be questioned
00:28:26.200 and certainly
00:28:28.100 the recent
00:28:28.840 straw polls
00:28:29.700 like the
00:28:31.240 TPUSA
00:28:32.080 straw poll
00:28:32.900 where Vivek
00:28:34.140 came in
00:28:34.440 second,
00:28:35.480 you can
00:28:35.900 say that's
00:28:36.300 not a
00:28:36.560 real poll,
00:28:37.320 that's a
00:28:37.720 straw poll.
00:28:39.260 And then I
00:28:39.560 saw Kanekoa
00:28:40.780 the Great
00:28:41.280 on Twitter,
00:28:42.500 he ran
00:28:42.900 his own
00:28:43.240 poll.
00:28:43.720 Again,
00:28:44.160 a Twitter
00:28:44.520 poll is
00:28:45.140 completely
00:28:46.000 unscientific,
00:28:47.140 but Ramaswamy
00:28:48.060 came in
00:28:48.460 second to
00:28:50.120 Trump.
00:28:51.240 So there
00:28:52.420 are three
00:28:53.040 instances
00:28:53.780 recently,
00:28:54.440 in the
00:28:55.000 last week,
00:28:55.960 in which
00:28:56.580 Vivek
00:28:57.100 placed
00:28:57.820 second or
00:28:58.760 competitively
00:28:59.580 with
00:29:00.100 DeSantis.
00:29:02.020 Now,
00:29:02.700 I'll say
00:29:03.040 again,
00:29:03.840 none of
00:29:04.400 that data
00:29:04.800 is reliable,
00:29:06.500 and some
00:29:07.120 of it
00:29:07.400 could be
00:29:07.760 wildly
00:29:08.380 unreliable,
00:29:09.500 probably
00:29:09.820 is.
00:29:10.760 But that
00:29:11.960 doesn't
00:29:12.240 matter to
00:29:12.680 the narrative.
00:29:13.960 It doesn't
00:29:14.560 matter to
00:29:15.060 the momentum,
00:29:17.120 right?
00:29:17.700 So there's
00:29:18.840 a momentum
00:29:19.320 issue.
00:29:20.600 So we're
00:29:21.200 already looking
00:29:21.920 at, you
00:29:22.740 know,
00:29:23.380 what might
00:29:24.360 happen in
00:29:25.020 the upcoming
00:29:25.860 primaries.
00:29:27.340 Vivek might
00:29:27.840 make a dent
00:29:29.240 there.
00:29:31.020 We're already
00:29:31.760 talking about
00:29:32.360 DeSantis
00:29:32.840 having to
00:29:33.580 retool his
00:29:34.240 campaign,
00:29:35.000 and why
00:29:35.820 isn't he
00:29:36.160 doing better
00:29:36.680 with all
00:29:37.000 the money
00:29:37.320 he has.
00:29:38.580 We're already
00:29:39.000 telling,
00:29:39.500 the news
00:29:40.100 is already
00:29:40.460 talking about
00:29:41.060 DeSantis
00:29:41.520 has all
00:29:41.960 this funding,
00:29:43.380 yet Vivek is
00:29:44.280 operating on
00:29:44.900 the shoestring
00:29:45.600 and killing
00:29:47.660 it using
00:29:48.360 new techniques,
00:29:49.560 basically,
00:29:50.080 and smarter
00:29:50.680 techniques.
00:29:51.180 who does
00:29:52.540 Vivek remind
00:29:53.320 you of
00:29:53.800 in his
00:29:54.280 campaigning?
00:29:55.880 Tell me
00:29:56.200 who he
00:29:56.440 reminds you
00:29:56.960 of.
00:29:59.440 Vivek
00:30:00.040 campaigning.
00:30:01.620 Trump
00:30:01.860 2015.
00:30:03.120 Yes,
00:30:03.580 Trump
00:30:03.800 2015.
00:30:04.960 Yeah,
00:30:05.220 he's using,
00:30:05.940 he's using,
00:30:06.880 what would
00:30:07.440 you call
00:30:07.820 it,
00:30:09.300 asymmetrical
00:30:10.160 techniques.
00:30:13.280 Basically,
00:30:13.780 he's going
00:30:14.620 on to
00:30:15.060 enemy podcasts
00:30:16.240 and owning
00:30:16.880 them.
00:30:17.080 who did
00:30:19.060 that?
00:30:20.840 Who said
00:30:21.480 I'm going
00:30:21.760 to go on
00:30:22.400 all the
00:30:22.820 most critical
00:30:23.660 podcasts
00:30:24.440 and TV
00:30:25.600 shows like
00:30:26.180 CNN and
00:30:27.280 I'm going
00:30:27.560 to own
00:30:27.900 them and
00:30:28.580 that's
00:30:28.800 how it
00:30:29.020 went?
00:30:30.660 Yeah,
00:30:31.060 it's sort
00:30:31.400 of a
00:30:31.560 Trump method
00:30:32.580 in a way.
00:30:34.460 So,
00:30:35.060 I think
00:30:35.760 Vivek is
00:30:36.340 doing a
00:30:36.920 modified,
00:30:38.820 improved,
00:30:39.760 it's an
00:30:40.180 improved version
00:30:40.820 of Trump
00:30:42.020 and it
00:30:42.880 works.
00:30:44.060 So,
00:30:44.380 every time
00:30:44.780 you see
00:30:45.260 Vivek do
00:30:46.020 something smart,
00:30:47.080 tell yourself
00:30:48.820 this,
00:30:50.340 when was
00:30:50.880 the last
00:30:51.180 time you
00:30:51.480 saw him
00:30:51.740 do something
00:30:52.160 that wasn't
00:30:52.740 smart?
00:30:54.860 You haven't.
00:30:56.820 He's
00:30:57.220 running,
00:30:57.640 he's running
00:30:58.440 the best
00:30:58.880 campaign
00:30:59.420 by far.
00:31:01.160 How many
00:31:01.660 would agree
00:31:02.180 with the
00:31:02.480 following
00:31:02.760 statement,
00:31:03.480 regardless
00:31:03.880 of whether
00:31:04.320 you want
00:31:04.600 him to
00:31:04.820 be your
00:31:05.060 president?
00:31:06.020 How many
00:31:06.360 would agree
00:31:06.900 so far
00:31:08.000 Vivek has
00:31:09.820 the best
00:31:10.200 campaign
00:31:10.720 on either
00:31:11.280 side and
00:31:12.440 somewhat
00:31:12.800 obviously
00:31:13.380 so?
00:31:14.560 I would
00:31:15.300 say he's
00:31:15.700 floating well
00:31:16.740 above the
00:31:17.280 other
00:31:17.480 candidates
00:31:18.040 in skill.
00:31:20.060 Yeah,
00:31:20.540 and basically
00:31:21.860 I'm seeing
00:31:22.320 every one
00:31:22.820 of you
00:31:23.060 agree,
00:31:24.020 almost 100%.
00:31:26.140 Are you
00:31:27.060 going to
00:31:27.180 tell me
00:31:27.420 that's not
00:31:27.840 predictive?
00:31:29.920 That's very
00:31:30.720 predictive.
00:31:32.280 Because remember,
00:31:33.120 Vivek doesn't
00:31:33.840 have a
00:31:34.620 government
00:31:35.360 experience,
00:31:36.760 so you
00:31:37.180 can't say
00:31:37.620 you liked
00:31:38.060 him as
00:31:38.400 a governor
00:31:39.240 or something.
00:31:40.320 The only
00:31:40.880 thing you're
00:31:41.380 going to
00:31:41.620 see,
00:31:42.060 since you
00:31:42.380 didn't see
00:31:42.760 him running
00:31:43.100 his businesses,
00:31:43.720 you're
00:31:44.720 going to
00:31:44.820 see him
00:31:45.100 running a
00:31:45.520 campaign.
00:31:48.040 So the
00:31:48.640 more he
00:31:49.020 does a
00:31:49.420 good job
00:31:49.800 of running
00:31:50.180 a campaign
00:31:50.860 the way
00:31:51.400 he has,
00:31:52.400 the more
00:31:52.740 you're
00:31:52.980 going to
00:31:53.040 say,
00:31:53.300 well,
00:31:53.420 that guy
00:31:53.720 can do
00:31:54.060 stuff.
00:31:54.940 He can
00:31:55.520 do stuff
00:31:56.020 and he's
00:31:57.000 in a field
00:31:57.460 where he's
00:31:58.280 competing
00:31:58.620 against all
00:31:59.200 the other
00:31:59.500 people who
00:31:59.980 are the
00:32:00.280 highest
00:32:00.580 quality
00:32:01.140 candidates
00:32:02.180 doing
00:32:02.580 stuff.
00:32:03.780 And the
00:32:04.320 stuff that
00:32:04.740 all of
00:32:05.100 them are
00:32:05.340 doing,
00:32:06.700 he's doing
00:32:07.120 better.
00:32:08.460 You can't
00:32:09.680 ignore that
00:32:10.260 after a
00:32:10.700 while.
00:32:12.180 Right?
00:32:12.820 And I
00:32:13.400 also think
00:32:13.920 he's the
00:32:14.420 sexy story.
00:32:16.700 Here's a
00:32:17.420 tip about
00:32:19.440 getting free
00:32:20.480 press.
00:32:21.780 The press
00:32:22.600 does not
00:32:23.180 care that
00:32:24.020 somebody's
00:32:24.480 doing a
00:32:24.820 good job.
00:32:26.280 That's not
00:32:26.900 a story.
00:32:27.560 Because people
00:32:28.240 do good
00:32:28.720 jobs.
00:32:30.760 It's a
00:32:31.360 story if
00:32:31.780 you do a
00:32:32.200 good job
00:32:32.580 in a
00:32:32.840 different
00:32:33.080 way.
00:32:35.160 And that's
00:32:35.780 what he's
00:32:36.100 doing.
00:32:36.700 He's doing
00:32:37.060 a good
00:32:37.380 job in a
00:32:37.880 different
00:32:38.140 way.
00:32:38.980 You know,
00:32:39.200 the podcast,
00:32:39.920 the shoestring,
00:32:41.140 even his
00:32:42.360 policies being
00:32:43.320 as clear as
00:32:44.140 they are and
00:32:44.800 provocative,
00:32:45.660 et cetera.
00:32:47.160 And eventually
00:32:48.480 you just
00:32:48.860 notice that.
00:32:49.820 So every
00:32:50.860 sign is
00:32:52.580 starting to
00:32:53.420 start to
00:32:56.080 indicate that
00:32:56.620 he will
00:32:56.880 rise.
00:32:58.080 Now, don't
00:32:58.880 believe the
00:32:59.300 polling yet.
00:33:00.400 I think if
00:33:00.860 you see a
00:33:01.240 national poll,
00:33:01.960 he's going
00:33:02.200 to be lower
00:33:02.580 than these
00:33:03.120 sketchy
00:33:04.040 polls.
00:33:04.740 But the
00:33:05.180 sketchy
00:33:05.600 polls do
00:33:06.160 pick up,
00:33:07.200 in my
00:33:07.500 opinion,
00:33:08.060 if there's
00:33:08.480 enough of
00:33:08.820 the sketchy
00:33:09.320 ones,
00:33:09.920 and they
00:33:10.420 all look
00:33:10.740 the same,
00:33:11.540 it's
00:33:12.040 picking up
00:33:12.520 an early
00:33:13.220 indication.
00:33:15.340 Think about
00:33:15.920 the fact,
00:33:16.940 just hold
00:33:17.580 this in
00:33:17.840 your mind,
00:33:18.820 that I
00:33:19.180 asked,
00:33:19.900 I don't
00:33:20.200 know,
00:33:20.300 there's
00:33:20.400 probably
00:33:20.640 several
00:33:21.540 thousand
00:33:21.900 people
00:33:22.240 watching
00:33:22.580 right
00:33:22.800 now.
00:33:23.580 I
00:33:23.980 asked
00:33:24.200 several
00:33:24.660 thousand
00:33:25.200 people
00:33:25.640 to agree
00:33:26.800 with the
00:33:27.140 statement
00:33:27.400 that Vivek
00:33:28.080 has the
00:33:28.480 best
00:33:28.840 campaign
00:33:30.560 by far.
00:33:32.520 And the
00:33:32.840 by far
00:33:33.300 thing should
00:33:34.420 have definitely
00:33:34.880 got me some
00:33:35.500 no's.
00:33:35.920 some
00:33:36.880 of you
00:33:37.240 should
00:33:37.540 have
00:33:37.660 said,
00:33:38.360 no,
00:33:38.800 you know,
00:33:39.080 somebody
00:33:39.300 else is
00:33:39.640 doing
00:33:39.820 just as
00:33:40.260 well.
00:33:41.080 But nobody
00:33:41.860 did.
00:33:42.720 None of
00:33:43.180 you.
00:33:44.040 Every single
00:33:44.780 person that
00:33:45.500 I saw,
00:33:45.940 I may have
00:33:46.300 missed one,
00:33:47.000 but every
00:33:47.540 answer I
00:33:48.020 saw streaming
00:33:48.640 by was
00:33:49.780 going,
00:33:50.100 oh yeah,
00:33:50.380 it's the
00:33:50.600 best campaign
00:33:51.140 by far.
00:33:53.340 You tell
00:33:53.980 me that's
00:33:54.300 not predictive.
00:33:57.020 That's
00:33:57.500 completely
00:33:57.940 predictive.
00:33:59.020 Completely.
00:34:00.160 Polls are
00:34:00.560 not.
00:34:01.040 Polls are
00:34:01.560 not predictive.
00:34:02.120 But a
00:34:03.400 stream of
00:34:03.900 yeses with
00:34:04.460 no no's?
00:34:06.040 Completely
00:34:06.560 predictive.
00:34:09.040 A lot
00:34:10.480 will happen,
00:34:11.240 so you
00:34:11.500 can't say
00:34:11.940 that's the
00:34:15.240 end point,
00:34:15.800 but it's
00:34:16.100 very
00:34:16.280 predictive.
00:34:19.040 All right.
00:34:21.260 Even
00:34:21.700 Trump
00:34:22.420 praised
00:34:23.100 Vivek,
00:34:24.040 and I
00:34:24.360 guess it
00:34:24.620 was in
00:34:24.860 the truth,
00:34:25.860 saying that
00:34:26.500 he had
00:34:26.840 pulled into
00:34:27.560 second place
00:34:28.280 and he
00:34:28.500 was doing
00:34:28.800 great.
00:34:29.140 Do you
00:34:31.980 think that
00:34:32.360 that's
00:34:32.640 an accident
00:34:34.000 that Trump
00:34:35.440 is boosting
00:34:36.680 Vivek?
00:34:38.200 And that
00:34:38.820 when Vivek
00:34:39.380 is asked
00:34:39.840 to criticize
00:34:40.440 Trump,
00:34:41.480 he won't
00:34:41.980 do it,
00:34:42.440 and he
00:34:42.600 says Trump
00:34:43.000 was a
00:34:43.320 great
00:34:43.520 president.
00:34:45.440 He says,
00:34:46.140 Vivek says
00:34:46.820 I'm not
00:34:47.160 running against
00:34:47.780 anybody.
00:34:51.200 That's
00:34:51.640 pretty much
00:34:52.120 exactly what
00:34:52.840 I want to
00:34:53.180 hear.
00:34:54.260 Don't you
00:34:54.560 love that?
00:34:55.700 I'm not
00:34:56.100 running against
00:34:56.720 anybody,
00:34:57.240 I'm running
00:34:57.600 for the
00:34:57.960 United States.
00:34:59.140 So I'm
00:35:00.120 running for
00:35:00.560 the United
00:35:00.940 States,
00:35:01.360 I'm offering
00:35:01.800 you a set
00:35:02.400 of skills
00:35:03.140 and a set
00:35:03.820 of policies.
00:35:05.700 If the
00:35:06.280 other people
00:35:06.740 are better,
00:35:07.200 vote for
00:35:07.480 them.
00:35:08.040 I mean,
00:35:08.260 he doesn't
00:35:08.500 say that
00:35:08.840 part.
00:35:09.380 But he's
00:35:09.580 saying this
00:35:09.900 is my
00:35:10.200 offer,
00:35:11.120 it's not
00:35:11.860 my job
00:35:12.280 to make
00:35:12.580 them look
00:35:12.940 bad.
00:35:13.940 Just look
00:35:14.360 at my
00:35:14.580 offer.
00:35:15.940 It's
00:35:16.160 really
00:35:16.380 strong,
00:35:17.220 very
00:35:17.580 strong.
00:35:18.360 Because
00:35:18.620 the weak
00:35:21.580 play,
00:35:22.060 the weak
00:35:22.840 play is to
00:35:23.400 say that
00:35:23.740 the other
00:35:24.080 one is
00:35:24.420 worse.
00:35:25.740 You know,
00:35:26.160 oh man,
00:35:27.000 Biden's
00:35:27.600 falling apart,
00:35:28.360 he's 100
00:35:28.760 years old.
00:35:29.900 That's the
00:35:30.420 weak play.
00:35:31.280 At least
00:35:31.720 I'm alive.
00:35:33.700 His play
00:35:34.420 is the
00:35:34.760 strongest play
00:35:35.400 you can
00:35:35.720 make.
00:35:36.400 I'm not
00:35:36.800 even running
00:35:37.280 against
00:35:37.620 competition.
00:35:39.480 I'm not
00:35:39.820 even running
00:35:40.220 against anybody.
00:35:41.380 You can't
00:35:41.820 get stronger
00:35:42.280 than that,
00:35:42.920 messaging-wise.
00:35:43.760 All right,
00:35:46.660 so let's
00:35:47.120 do a little
00:35:47.620 take a
00:35:49.500 look at
00:35:49.980 Go
00:35:50.460 Woke,
00:35:50.900 Go
00:35:51.080 Broke,
00:35:51.540 how that's
00:35:51.860 going.
00:35:52.280 So Bud
00:35:52.740 Light did
00:35:53.240 poorly,
00:35:54.580 getting woke.
00:35:55.680 Target
00:35:56.080 stores,
00:35:56.920 I believe
00:35:57.400 they're still
00:35:57.780 down,
00:35:58.260 stock price,
00:35:58.960 Disney,
00:36:00.080 taking a
00:36:00.540 hit,
00:36:01.140 Ben and
00:36:01.560 Jerry's
00:36:01.960 taking a
00:36:02.380 hit,
00:36:03.600 Stanford
00:36:04.180 Law School
00:36:04.940 is getting
00:36:06.440 rid of their
00:36:06.860 DEI
00:36:07.500 administrator,
00:36:08.220 who accosted
00:36:10.100 a sitting
00:36:10.480 federal judge
00:36:11.440 during one
00:36:13.740 of their
00:36:13.980 speaking
00:36:14.440 events.
00:36:15.820 She was
00:36:16.300 in the
00:36:16.520 crowd and
00:36:17.100 accosted
00:36:17.800 the speaker
00:36:18.460 for his
00:36:19.380 political
00:36:19.740 views,
00:36:20.180 I think.
00:36:21.180 Or not
00:36:21.820 even political,
00:36:22.940 just for
00:36:23.540 his views.
00:36:24.660 They invited
00:36:25.260 a speaker
00:36:25.780 and then
00:36:26.260 she
00:36:26.460 heckled
00:36:26.920 him.
00:36:28.900 And she
00:36:29.380 worked for
00:36:30.560 the school.
00:36:32.200 So she's
00:36:32.920 going.
00:36:34.100 And then
00:36:34.660 Derek Chauvin
00:36:36.320 is appealing
00:36:37.380 his
00:36:38.020 conviction
00:36:38.440 to the
00:36:38.880 Supreme
00:36:39.240 Court.
00:36:41.020 Now,
00:36:42.720 what do
00:36:44.440 you think
00:36:44.780 about that?
00:36:46.440 In my
00:36:47.200 opinion,
00:36:48.020 so this
00:36:48.680 is my
00:36:48.980 opinion of
00:36:49.420 the whole
00:36:49.700 George Floyd
00:36:50.380 situation.
00:36:53.020 While I'm
00:36:53.780 no expert
00:36:54.440 on police
00:36:55.880 procedure,
00:36:57.320 so I
00:36:57.820 don't have
00:36:58.280 an opinion
00:36:58.620 on whether
00:36:58.980 he violated
00:36:59.540 police
00:36:59.920 procedure,
00:37:02.000 but I
00:37:04.900 did not
00:37:05.280 see him
00:37:05.660 murdering
00:37:06.100 anybody.
00:37:06.460 I watched
00:37:08.000 the video
00:37:08.440 too,
00:37:08.820 and I
00:37:09.060 didn't
00:37:09.200 see it.
00:37:10.160 I saw
00:37:10.520 a tragic
00:37:11.060 situation,
00:37:12.520 and I
00:37:12.840 saw a
00:37:13.620 prisoner who
00:37:14.380 made every
00:37:14.960 mistake that
00:37:16.400 led to his
00:37:17.020 own death.
00:37:18.660 Probably he
00:37:19.380 took a bunch
00:37:19.980 of pills
00:37:20.880 when he got
00:37:21.380 stopped just
00:37:22.020 so he
00:37:22.260 wouldn't get
00:37:22.580 caught with
00:37:23.000 them.
00:37:23.880 Probably
00:37:24.320 that's what
00:37:24.820 killed him.
00:37:26.560 Probably if
00:37:27.400 he had said
00:37:27.800 he had
00:37:28.100 fentanyl in
00:37:28.780 him,
00:37:29.540 that he
00:37:29.880 would have
00:37:30.080 been treated
00:37:30.520 differently.
00:37:31.900 Probably if
00:37:32.640 he said,
00:37:33.080 I think I'm
00:37:33.500 overdosing on
00:37:34.240 fentanyl,
00:37:34.820 he would
00:37:35.080 still be
00:37:35.520 here.
00:37:36.320 So if
00:37:36.680 he hadn't
00:37:37.060 been a
00:37:37.580 criminal,
00:37:38.640 a drug
00:37:39.020 addict,
00:37:39.480 and a
00:37:39.860 liar right
00:37:40.900 until his
00:37:41.260 final breath,
00:37:42.740 he'd probably
00:37:43.160 be alive.
00:37:44.340 That said,
00:37:44.920 it was still
00:37:45.280 a tragedy.
00:37:46.740 Nobody wants
00:37:47.280 to see anybody
00:37:47.960 get killed
00:37:48.600 accidentally or
00:37:50.380 intentionally.
00:37:51.520 It was just
00:37:51.980 a tragedy.
00:37:52.980 And I do
00:37:53.440 think there's
00:37:54.400 a reasonable
00:37:54.860 argument that
00:37:56.240 maybe a
00:37:57.360 police officer
00:37:58.880 in that
00:37:59.220 situation should
00:38:01.400 have known
00:38:01.840 that there
00:38:02.180 was more
00:38:02.520 of a problem
00:38:03.080 than it
00:38:04.180 seemed.
00:38:05.420 And maybe
00:38:05.960 he was
00:38:06.280 playing to
00:38:06.680 the crowd
00:38:07.040 a little
00:38:07.340 too much.
00:38:07.940 Maybe.
00:38:09.220 I think
00:38:10.820 you'd have
00:38:11.140 to be in
00:38:11.480 his head
00:38:11.960 to know
00:38:12.340 what was
00:38:12.660 really
00:38:12.880 happening,
00:38:13.420 and you
00:38:13.640 can't be.
00:38:15.040 So what
00:38:15.540 would be
00:38:15.860 your guess
00:38:16.680 of what
00:38:18.160 would be
00:38:18.580 the outcome
00:38:19.220 of a
00:38:19.700 Supreme
00:38:20.080 Court ruling
00:38:21.000 on this
00:38:21.460 case?
00:38:22.460 Now that
00:38:23.040 the temperature
00:38:23.640 has gone
00:38:24.120 down,
00:38:25.340 and we
00:38:25.660 see how
00:38:26.040 much was
00:38:26.680 propaganda
00:38:28.680 and how
00:38:29.400 much was
00:38:29.840 real.
00:38:32.700 Do you
00:38:33.340 think that
00:38:33.720 the Supreme
00:38:34.200 Court will
00:38:34.920 change it,
00:38:35.960 overturn it?
00:38:36.960 I don't
00:38:37.460 know exactly
00:38:38.060 what basis
00:38:39.180 he's appealing
00:38:39.800 on.
00:38:40.380 Does anybody
00:38:40.960 know upon
00:38:41.600 what basis
00:38:42.300 it's being
00:38:42.780 appealed?
00:38:44.720 What was it
00:38:45.880 that didn't
00:38:46.260 look fair?
00:38:50.860 Some of
00:38:51.580 you...
00:38:52.380 All right.
00:38:55.240 Yeah, we
00:38:55.560 don't know
00:38:55.860 what it was.
00:38:57.680 Oh, was
00:38:58.320 it that the
00:38:58.660 jury was
00:38:59.140 scared?
00:38:59.900 Jury
00:39:00.340 tampering?
00:39:01.620 That's pretty
00:39:02.060 good.
00:39:02.380 That would
00:39:02.700 be a good
00:39:03.060 argument.
00:39:03.700 A good
00:39:04.100 argument would
00:39:04.740 be there
00:39:05.520 wasn't a
00:39:05.980 possibility of
00:39:06.660 a fair
00:39:06.940 trial,
00:39:07.800 because the
00:39:08.460 jurors would
00:39:09.080 be afraid
00:39:09.540 for their
00:39:09.900 own deaths.
00:39:11.420 If you
00:39:12.000 took that
00:39:12.400 to me and
00:39:12.840 I was
00:39:13.080 under the
00:39:13.440 Supreme
00:39:13.700 Court,
00:39:14.500 I'd set
00:39:14.980 them free
00:39:15.380 with that
00:39:17.160 argument.
00:39:18.260 If you
00:39:18.800 made the
00:39:19.120 argument that
00:39:19.760 the jurors
00:39:20.500 could not
00:39:20.940 have possibly
00:39:21.720 been independent
00:39:22.580 as a Supreme
00:39:24.620 Court justice,
00:39:25.140 I wouldn't
00:39:25.660 even have to
00:39:26.120 listen to the
00:39:26.560 argument.
00:39:27.860 Anybody who
00:39:28.440 watched the
00:39:28.840 news knows
00:39:29.520 that the jury
00:39:30.080 couldn't
00:39:30.440 possibly feel
00:39:31.220 safe.
00:39:32.680 They had to
00:39:33.120 live in that
00:39:33.580 town.
00:39:35.420 To me, that
00:39:36.120 would be a
00:39:36.500 slam dunk.
00:39:37.660 It would be
00:39:38.300 obvious evidence
00:39:39.760 that he did not
00:39:40.600 get a fair trial,
00:39:41.240 which doesn't
00:39:42.020 mean he's
00:39:42.340 innocent.
00:39:43.720 You could have
00:39:44.640 an unfair trial
00:39:45.600 independent of
00:39:46.800 whether you're
00:39:47.140 guilty or innocent.
00:39:47.880 But to me,
00:39:49.180 the unfairness
00:39:50.120 of the trial
00:39:50.580 is completely
00:39:52.600 obvious.
00:39:54.220 Completely
00:39:54.700 obvious.
00:39:55.800 There isn't
00:39:56.280 any chance he
00:39:57.160 could have
00:39:57.420 gotten a fair
00:39:57.900 trial in that
00:39:58.860 situation.
00:40:00.000 But again,
00:40:01.020 I'm not saying
00:40:01.680 he was fault
00:40:02.180 free.
00:40:02.900 Not at all.
00:40:04.680 But this
00:40:05.040 could be,
00:40:07.640 this is the
00:40:08.460 sort of case
00:40:08.980 that could
00:40:09.380 determine the
00:40:09.940 presidency.
00:40:12.660 Right?
00:40:13.140 If the
00:40:14.500 conservative
00:40:15.000 court overturns
00:40:17.040 the George
00:40:17.500 Floyd thing,
00:40:18.800 you're not
00:40:20.660 going to get
00:40:20.960 a Republican
00:40:21.440 president.
00:40:23.480 Is that too
00:40:24.280 far?
00:40:25.920 If the
00:40:26.640 George Floyd
00:40:27.200 thing gets
00:40:27.680 overturned
00:40:28.400 before the
00:40:28.960 vote, there
00:40:30.260 will not be
00:40:30.760 a Republican
00:40:31.280 president.
00:40:32.540 Because the
00:40:33.180 country will
00:40:33.640 flip out.
00:40:35.000 It has nothing
00:40:35.580 to do with
00:40:36.060 facts or what's
00:40:37.080 right or wrong.
00:40:38.240 The country
00:40:38.740 would just
00:40:39.120 flip out.
00:40:40.100 You've got
00:40:40.500 one side of
00:40:40.960 the country
00:40:41.300 that's
00:40:42.140 unbalanced.
00:40:44.660 Not all of
00:40:45.520 them, of
00:40:45.860 course.
00:40:47.040 But there
00:40:47.360 are many
00:40:47.640 unbalanced
00:40:48.320 people who
00:40:48.940 would literally
00:40:49.440 cause riots
00:40:50.240 and flip out.
00:40:51.660 And of
00:40:52.020 course, the
00:40:52.760 Democrats would
00:40:54.020 fuel it because
00:40:55.480 it would be
00:40:56.100 good for their
00:40:57.140 voting chances.
00:40:58.680 So yeah, this
00:40:59.820 could be the
00:41:00.280 only thing that
00:41:00.920 matters to the
00:41:01.760 who gets
00:41:02.700 picked president.
00:41:04.560 Could be the
00:41:05.340 only thing that
00:41:05.760 matters.
00:41:07.000 It also might
00:41:07.620 be an
00:41:08.100 advantage for
00:41:11.580 Ramaswamy.
00:41:13.200 Because you
00:41:13.540 want the
00:41:14.900 brownest
00:41:15.520 or Tim
00:41:17.440 Scott.
00:41:17.920 You want
00:41:18.240 the brownest
00:41:18.940 or blackest
00:41:19.800 candidate if
00:41:21.800 you're going to
00:41:22.100 be arguing
00:41:22.560 against George
00:41:23.240 Floyd.
00:41:24.720 If George
00:41:25.640 Floyd, the
00:41:26.760 ghost of
00:41:27.240 George Floyd
00:41:27.900 enters the
00:41:28.800 conversation,
00:41:30.660 you're going to
00:41:31.240 want to have a
00:41:31.760 Tim Scott or
00:41:32.560 a Vague,
00:41:34.780 just to give
00:41:35.320 you a little
00:41:35.860 bit more
00:41:36.280 feeling of
00:41:37.040 cover, even
00:41:38.880 though it's
00:41:39.440 irrelevant.
00:41:39.800 all of this
00:41:41.340 is how you
00:41:41.680 feel about
00:41:42.180 stuff.
00:41:42.580 None of
00:41:42.800 it is
00:41:42.980 logical.
00:41:45.320 All right.
00:41:48.820 Let's see
00:41:49.300 what else
00:41:49.580 has gone on.
00:41:52.020 How many of
00:41:52.660 you saw the
00:41:53.240 former New
00:41:53.800 York Post
00:41:54.200 editor, I
00:41:54.980 think he's
00:41:55.320 that bright
00:41:55.680 bird now,
00:41:57.580 talking about
00:41:58.360 the, I
00:41:59.600 think it was
00:41:59.880 the laptop
00:42:00.320 story that got
00:42:01.100 suppressed, if I
00:42:02.960 have that right.
00:42:03.740 Do my fact
00:42:04.340 checking.
00:42:05.360 And here was
00:42:06.540 the best part
00:42:07.140 about it.
00:42:07.520 So first
00:42:08.220 of all, she
00:42:08.580 did a
00:42:08.960 tremendous job
00:42:10.100 of her
00:42:11.660 public
00:42:12.020 presentation.
00:42:13.160 It was just
00:42:13.740 really strong.
00:42:15.580 My takeaway
00:42:16.700 was, wow,
00:42:17.980 that's a
00:42:18.540 strong person.
00:42:20.460 I was just
00:42:20.920 impressed with
00:42:21.640 her as a
00:42:22.120 person.
00:42:23.420 She had that
00:42:24.740 sort of
00:42:25.780 natural
00:42:26.460 inward
00:42:27.840 strength
00:42:28.560 thing.
00:42:29.780 You know
00:42:30.000 what I mean?
00:42:31.100 Very impressive.
00:42:32.000 Anyway, the
00:42:33.400 best part was
00:42:34.300 that she
00:42:34.640 laughed
00:42:35.340 at the
00:42:38.880 attempts to
00:42:39.720 cover up
00:42:40.160 the story
00:42:40.700 because they
00:42:41.760 were so
00:42:42.280 ridiculous.
00:42:43.920 And you
00:42:44.500 have to hear
00:42:45.020 her laugh
00:42:45.660 because the
00:42:47.320 laugh, I've
00:42:50.000 been telling
00:42:50.380 you, you
00:42:51.740 have to get
00:42:52.220 to the
00:42:52.580 laugh.
00:42:53.880 You have to
00:42:54.440 get to the
00:42:54.780 point where
00:42:55.120 you can
00:42:55.480 mock the
00:42:56.960 ridiculousness
00:42:58.020 of, you
00:43:00.020 know, at
00:43:00.500 least half
00:43:00.880 of the
00:43:01.140 country's
00:43:01.740 actions.
00:43:02.780 And she
00:43:03.420 laughed
00:43:03.840 genuinely.
00:43:05.340 And spontaneously.
00:43:06.780 And she
00:43:07.280 wasn't
00:43:07.700 planning to
00:43:08.280 do it, I
00:43:08.700 don't think.
00:43:09.120 It didn't
00:43:09.400 look planned.
00:43:10.380 It looked
00:43:10.880 like when
00:43:11.300 she thought
00:43:11.820 about it, it
00:43:13.060 was hilarious
00:43:13.760 in retrospect
00:43:14.660 that such a
00:43:16.200 clown show
00:43:16.800 had ever
00:43:17.140 happened.
00:43:18.000 And when
00:43:18.280 you watch
00:43:18.780 a serious
00:43:19.700 person laugh
00:43:21.220 out loud at
00:43:22.080 Congress, and
00:43:23.340 laugh out loud,
00:43:24.560 genuinely laugh,
00:43:26.340 genuinely, and
00:43:27.720 mock the
00:43:28.940 fucked upness
00:43:29.680 of the other
00:43:30.760 side that was
00:43:31.420 suppressing the
00:43:32.320 story, it
00:43:33.600 was a great
00:43:34.300 moment in
00:43:35.640 congressional
00:43:36.160 hearings.
00:43:37.760 It really
00:43:38.520 was great.
00:43:39.980 So RFK
00:43:40.760 Jr.
00:43:41.240 hit it out
00:43:41.940 in the
00:43:42.120 park.
00:43:43.500 But can
00:43:43.920 you give
00:43:44.180 me the
00:43:44.640 name?
00:43:45.480 For some
00:43:46.200 reason, I
00:43:46.740 was looking
00:43:47.140 for her
00:43:47.480 name, and
00:43:47.820 everybody was
00:43:48.420 talking about
00:43:48.940 her as a
00:43:49.380 former New
00:43:49.880 York Post
00:43:50.300 editor.
00:43:51.760 Emma
00:43:52.000 Joe Morris,
00:43:53.460 thank you.
00:43:54.620 Yeah, the
00:43:55.040 news was weird
00:43:55.740 about it.
00:43:56.800 The news
00:43:57.200 was, like,
00:43:57.880 weirdly, at
00:43:59.960 least in the
00:44:00.340 headlines,
00:44:00.740 they were
00:44:00.900 suppressing
00:44:01.260 her name.
00:44:01.640 All right.
00:44:05.560 So more
00:44:06.540 of that, more
00:44:07.620 of that laughing
00:44:08.440 and mocking
00:44:08.960 of things
00:44:09.660 which should
00:44:10.100 be laughed
00:44:10.540 at and
00:44:10.960 mocked,
00:44:11.680 because they
00:44:12.760 are genuinely
00:44:13.280 funny.
00:44:15.120 All right.
00:44:16.360 I would like
00:44:17.280 to give you
00:44:18.760 now the
00:44:20.200 most provocative
00:44:21.040 speculation you'll
00:44:22.280 hear all day.
00:44:24.180 You ready?
00:44:24.800 All right.
00:44:24.880 Attorney General
00:44:30.680 Merrick Garland
00:44:31.780 is the
00:44:33.780 Rosetta Stone
00:44:34.740 that will
00:44:36.940 allow you to
00:44:37.660 figure out
00:44:38.500 who's running
00:44:39.940 the actual
00:44:40.460 country.
00:44:43.360 Now, if you
00:44:44.240 don't know what
00:44:44.560 the Rosetta Stone
00:44:45.320 was, it was
00:44:46.120 an ancient
00:44:46.720 stone that
00:44:47.460 had three
00:44:48.520 different ancient
00:44:49.160 languages of
00:44:51.020 the same
00:44:51.520 message, and
00:44:52.840 because it was
00:44:53.380 the same
00:44:53.720 message, it
00:44:54.300 was three
00:44:54.720 ancient
00:44:55.100 languages, this
00:44:56.580 one stone
00:44:57.360 allowed you
00:44:58.900 to figure out
00:44:59.980 Egyptian
00:45:00.500 hieroglyphics
00:45:01.720 and other
00:45:02.420 stuff.
00:45:03.520 So the
00:45:04.200 Rosetta Stone
00:45:04.820 was the
00:45:05.140 thing that
00:45:05.440 unlocked the
00:45:06.460 language and
00:45:07.460 the understanding
00:45:08.100 of a whole
00:45:08.820 bigger world.
00:45:09.640 world is
00:45:11.900 starting to look
00:45:12.560 like Merrick
00:45:13.140 Garland.
00:45:15.160 And let me
00:45:15.920 tell you why
00:45:16.580 I come to
00:45:17.720 this conclusion.
00:45:20.260 It looks like
00:45:21.420 the DOJ and
00:45:22.920 the FBI are
00:45:23.700 totally dirty.
00:45:25.160 It looks like
00:45:26.140 he was put
00:45:26.640 there because
00:45:27.420 he's part of
00:45:28.340 that.
00:45:29.440 He gives me
00:45:30.380 the impression
00:45:30.900 of someone who
00:45:31.560 is not in
00:45:32.100 charge of
00:45:32.540 himself.
00:45:34.160 Can everybody
00:45:35.020 agree on
00:45:35.500 that?
00:45:35.700 He gives
00:45:37.500 the impression
00:45:38.080 of someone who
00:45:38.940 is not in
00:45:39.480 charge of
00:45:40.200 himself.
00:45:41.640 He does
00:45:42.220 not look like
00:45:42.800 somebody who
00:45:43.320 is strong.
00:45:44.680 He does not
00:45:45.260 look like he
00:45:45.920 comes up with
00:45:46.460 opinions and
00:45:47.140 then he makes
00:45:47.580 everybody agree
00:45:48.360 or tough luck.
00:45:49.960 He looks like
00:45:50.860 a puppet.
00:45:52.260 He has the
00:45:52.720 personality and
00:45:53.720 the presentation
00:45:54.440 of a puppet.
00:45:55.260 Now, was it
00:45:58.960 the Clintons
00:45:59.680 who originally
00:46:00.520 tried, who
00:46:01.420 was it, was
00:46:02.020 it Obama, who
00:46:03.400 tried to get
00:46:03.920 him on the
00:46:04.260 Supreme Court?
00:46:05.800 It was Obama,
00:46:06.700 right?
00:46:07.820 So, who do
00:46:08.780 you try to put
00:46:09.340 on the Supreme
00:46:09.980 Court if you're
00:46:10.640 a Democrat?
00:46:11.680 A puppet.
00:46:12.700 You want
00:46:13.060 somebody who
00:46:13.480 is absolutely
00:46:14.220 definitely going
00:46:14.880 to vote the
00:46:15.280 way you want.
00:46:16.700 Now, I don't
00:46:17.260 know if that's
00:46:17.680 true on the
00:46:18.120 right.
00:46:19.920 Like, Kavanaugh
00:46:20.980 did not come
00:46:21.720 off as a puppet.
00:46:23.380 Did he?
00:46:23.780 He came off
00:46:25.400 as, you
00:46:26.100 know, maybe
00:46:26.460 Republican-y, but
00:46:28.020 he didn't look
00:46:28.400 like a puppet.
00:46:29.880 Gorsuch, you
00:46:30.680 know, no.
00:46:31.660 So, the other
00:46:32.220 ones don't, the
00:46:33.480 other ones never
00:46:34.040 struck me that
00:46:34.820 way.
00:46:35.120 They just don't
00:46:35.580 have that
00:46:35.920 demeanor.
00:46:37.340 But Garlic,
00:46:38.440 uh, Garlic,
00:46:39.540 Merrick Garland,
00:46:41.060 he looks like a
00:46:42.560 puppet.
00:46:44.360 Now, could you
00:46:45.520 understand everything
00:46:46.820 about the
00:46:47.480 allegations about
00:46:48.480 the Bidens that
00:46:49.240 were not being
00:46:49.820 pursued by him
00:46:51.720 being the agent
00:46:52.660 of the deep
00:46:53.140 state?
00:46:53.780 To me, it
00:46:55.180 looks like they
00:46:55.720 put their most
00:46:56.940 trusted puppet in
00:46:58.280 the attorney general
00:46:59.020 job because they
00:47:00.200 know they're all
00:47:00.780 criminals.
00:47:04.040 Right?
00:47:05.100 So, here's what
00:47:06.000 you do.
00:47:06.720 You find out who
00:47:07.560 Garland is closest
00:47:08.680 to in the real
00:47:10.100 world, who's he
00:47:11.340 have dinner with,
00:47:12.680 who's he worked
00:47:13.300 with in the past,
00:47:14.700 you know, what law
00:47:15.280 firm was he in,
00:47:16.660 and you can piece
00:47:17.440 together the entire
00:47:18.500 network of who's
00:47:19.720 actually in charge
00:47:20.520 because they're all
00:47:21.520 going to have some
00:47:22.060 connection that emanates
00:47:23.080 from him.
00:47:24.160 He is the
00:47:24.820 Rosetta Stone of
00:47:25.820 who's actually in
00:47:26.840 charge, and it's
00:47:27.860 not the Bidens.
00:47:30.100 It's clearly not.
00:47:31.620 Do you know why I
00:47:32.160 say it's not the
00:47:32.780 Bidens?
00:47:33.620 I'm not doing that
00:47:34.620 old thing like, oh,
00:47:35.700 Joe Biden is old and
00:47:36.980 he doesn't know where
00:47:37.600 he is.
00:47:38.120 That's not what I'm
00:47:38.900 doing.
00:47:39.100 It has nothing to do
00:47:41.220 with his age,
00:47:42.280 infirmary, or his
00:47:43.160 mental condition.
00:47:46.660 You see what's
00:47:47.560 happening, right?
00:47:49.220 Merrick Garland can
00:47:50.420 put him in fucking
00:47:51.360 jail any time he
00:47:53.380 wants.
00:47:55.200 Merrick Garland is
00:47:56.380 in charge because he
00:47:58.120 can put Biden in
00:47:58.960 jail any time he
00:47:59.980 wants.
00:48:00.860 You know that, right?
00:48:03.080 You know that.
00:48:04.880 You know he can
00:48:05.800 because he's got the
00:48:06.960 goods.
00:48:08.380 But Merrick Garland
00:48:09.780 will not do that.
00:48:10.900 Do you know why?
00:48:12.580 Because Merrick Garland
00:48:13.420 is not in charge of
00:48:14.340 Merrick Garland.
00:48:16.580 It's very unlikely he's
00:48:18.820 in charge of himself.
00:48:20.860 And if he's not in
00:48:21.900 charge of himself, it
00:48:23.320 means somebody controls
00:48:24.440 Garland and Garland
00:48:25.620 controls the Bidens.
00:48:28.100 Because they've known
00:48:29.140 for a long time that
00:48:30.300 Hunter was crooked.
00:48:32.200 In fact, I would go
00:48:33.200 further and say the
00:48:34.200 reason that Biden was
00:48:35.320 chosen is because he
00:48:37.460 was controlled.
00:48:40.000 I believe the only
00:48:41.320 reason Biden was ever
00:48:42.580 a candidate and won is
00:48:44.940 that he's a controlled
00:48:45.960 candidate.
00:48:46.460 So look for Merrick
00:48:48.360 Garland and who he's
00:48:49.400 connected to and that
00:48:50.220 will tell you who's
00:48:50.920 running the country.
00:48:53.320 And no, I'm not joking
00:48:54.500 about any of it.
00:48:56.660 Not joking about any of
00:48:58.220 it.
00:48:59.420 That's the most logical
00:49:00.920 explanation of what we
00:49:02.260 observe.
00:49:03.660 The least logical
00:49:05.000 explanation is that the
00:49:06.700 Democrats thought Biden
00:49:07.880 would be a good
00:49:08.500 president.
00:49:09.960 Am I right?
00:49:12.240 Nobody's buying that.
00:49:13.960 Like they might think
00:49:14.840 that he was good enough
00:49:16.240 to get the job done.
00:49:17.460 But do they really think
00:49:18.460 there was nobody?
00:49:20.480 Do Democrats really
00:49:21.560 believe nobody was
00:49:23.440 qualified by him?
00:49:24.940 He was the one.
00:49:27.280 I doubt it.
00:49:29.260 All right.
00:49:29.480 So you've got a
00:49:30.520 president who's got a
00:49:32.640 criminal rap sheet or,
00:49:35.840 you know, at least
00:49:36.600 allegations a mile long.
00:49:39.300 And it all looks
00:49:40.400 obviously true.
00:49:41.480 To me, it looks all
00:49:43.500 obviously true.
00:49:44.620 The only thing keeping
00:49:45.680 the Bidens out of jail
00:49:47.020 has got to be the
00:49:49.220 attorney general.
00:49:51.840 And I would also argue
00:49:53.200 that the, some member of
00:49:56.240 the, you know, Democrats,
00:49:57.820 they pretty much had to
00:49:59.020 rig the election to make
00:50:00.780 sure they didn't lose.
00:50:02.120 Because if you were a
00:50:03.100 Democrat and you lost,
00:50:03.960 you went to jail.
00:50:05.840 Potentially.
00:50:06.840 Because there were a lot
00:50:07.520 of crimes there, it looks
00:50:08.420 like.
00:50:08.640 So to me, it looks
00:50:10.580 like the most, the most
00:50:13.200 reasonable explanation of
00:50:14.740 what we've seen, and I'll
00:50:17.180 say this as clearly as
00:50:18.220 possible, there is no
00:50:19.880 evidence that I'm aware
00:50:20.980 of that the 2020 election
00:50:22.940 was rigged.
00:50:24.240 I'm not aware of any
00:50:25.400 evidence of that.
00:50:27.100 However, it is the most
00:50:28.780 reasonable, the most
00:50:30.340 reasonable interpretation of
00:50:31.900 everything we've seen is
00:50:32.900 that it was.
00:50:35.080 But no evidence.
00:50:36.220 But, could it be rigged
00:50:39.040 and leave no evidence?
00:50:42.080 Of course.
00:50:44.980 Of course.
00:50:46.320 It's only the idiot media
00:50:47.860 that tells you it's
00:50:48.680 impossible.
00:50:50.000 Oh, there's no way to
00:50:51.360 rig an election.
00:50:52.680 That can't happen.
00:50:55.580 So, you know, I'm not
00:50:57.520 claiming there's any
00:50:58.340 evidence.
00:50:59.380 There's no evidence that
00:51:00.500 I'm aware of.
00:51:01.500 None at all.
00:51:02.720 Zero evidence that I'm
00:51:03.780 aware of.
00:51:04.180 That's, you know, that I
00:51:05.380 would call credible.
00:51:07.740 However, when you look
00:51:09.760 at the totality of the
00:51:11.260 situation, it was a
00:51:13.080 can't-lose situation.
00:51:15.420 In a can't-lose situation,
00:51:17.280 you don't leave it to the
00:51:18.140 voters.
00:51:19.180 Do you?
00:51:20.580 If you thought you
00:51:21.420 could go to jail, if you
00:51:23.740 lost the election, would
00:51:24.780 you leave it to the
00:51:25.500 voters?
00:51:26.220 If you've already, if
00:51:27.220 you're already a criminal.
00:51:28.720 If you're already a
00:51:29.540 criminal, you're going to
00:51:30.240 do the second crime to
00:51:31.320 stay out of jail, for sure.
00:51:32.940 You're not going to say,
00:51:33.680 well, I did that crime,
00:51:35.120 I'm going to go to jail,
00:51:36.360 but I'd hate to do
00:51:37.260 anything illegal to stay
00:51:38.920 out of jail.
00:51:40.300 No.
00:51:42.100 So the most reasonable
00:51:43.600 explanation is that
00:51:45.640 Garland is owned, he's
00:51:49.020 the one who owns Biden,
00:51:50.520 and that somebody else is
00:51:52.600 in charge.
00:51:53.740 Or more, it might be more
00:51:54.940 than one.
00:51:55.560 I mean, it's not
00:51:56.520 necessarily one person.
00:51:57.560 It might be a group of
00:51:59.260 people who have something
00:52:00.840 in common.
00:52:03.520 How do you like my
00:52:04.420 speculation?
00:52:06.800 You loved it because it
00:52:08.020 agrees with what you
00:52:08.820 want to think anyway.
00:52:13.020 If I had to bet on it,
00:52:15.000 gun to head, gun to head,
00:52:17.460 I'd bet it was true.
00:52:21.520 Gun to head, I would bet
00:52:23.100 it's true.
00:52:25.080 But I don't know.
00:52:26.000 And I can't give you
00:52:27.860 any evidence.
00:52:30.160 So, anyway.
00:52:33.620 Let's see what that
00:52:34.460 does.
00:52:36.600 If you're subscribed to
00:52:38.740 the Dilbert Reborn comic,
00:52:40.260 either on Twitter, you can
00:52:41.420 subscribe, see my profile,
00:52:43.280 or you're subscribed on the
00:52:44.900 Locals platform at
00:52:46.180 scottadams.locals.com,
00:52:49.000 you would know that
00:52:49.940 Dilbert is still in an
00:52:51.740 Elbonian jail with the
00:52:53.000 Taint brothers.
00:52:53.860 And today, they're
00:52:56.580 teaching him how to be a
00:52:57.520 man.
00:52:59.900 That's all I'm going to
00:53:00.760 tell you.
00:53:02.260 The Taint brothers are
00:53:03.360 teaching Dilbert how to be
00:53:04.480 a man in jail.
00:53:07.980 So, can't tell you the
00:53:10.120 rest.
00:53:10.920 But you won't see that in
00:53:12.120 newspapers.
00:53:14.780 All right.
00:53:16.220 Ladies and gentlemen,
00:53:18.480 I still have four minutes
00:53:20.520 to go for my hour.
00:53:21.600 Is there any story I
00:53:24.220 missed?
00:53:25.580 You know, I could have
00:53:26.240 spent all day long talking
00:53:27.620 about the hearings, but
00:53:30.300 honestly, it's too
00:53:31.120 complicated.
00:53:32.580 Like, you get into the
00:53:33.860 minutiae so much that it
00:53:36.500 sort of loses its sparkle.
00:53:38.740 Tesla is a humanoid robot.
00:53:47.120 Optimus, Tesla is what?
00:53:50.400 Optimus, Tesla is
00:53:51.920 humanoid robot.
00:53:52.840 Does Tesla have a
00:53:53.840 humanoid robot that we've
00:53:55.920 seen?
00:53:56.880 Is it ready to go?
00:53:59.380 I cannot.
00:54:00.300 Oh, yeah.
00:54:01.320 I guess I missed that
00:54:02.240 story.
00:54:03.180 But how much do you want
00:54:05.880 to have a Tesla robot?
00:54:07.000 Well, I think the first
00:54:08.820 ones are just going to be
00:54:09.600 industrial, right?
00:54:11.160 You know, they're not
00:54:11.680 going to be for the home.
00:54:13.240 I think they just carry
00:54:14.300 heavy boxes in factories
00:54:16.160 and stuff.
00:54:21.760 Now, the reason I
00:54:22.720 discourage Super Chat is
00:54:24.540 not that I don't want
00:54:25.580 your money.
00:54:27.060 It's that it's disruptive
00:54:29.040 to the flow.
00:54:32.060 Dr. Shiva interview,
00:54:33.280 haven't seen it.
00:54:34.000 Why is the media covering
00:54:42.620 them all?
00:54:43.160 Covering what?
00:54:46.020 How long until we have
00:54:47.120 robots building a pyramid?
00:54:48.820 Super pyramid.
00:54:53.380 Oh, Anthony Weiner on the
00:54:56.660 Patrick, Pat, David
00:54:59.880 podcast.
00:55:00.680 How many saw
00:55:01.900 Patrick, Pat, David
00:55:04.140 PDB
00:55:05.420 and Anthony Weiner
00:55:08.580 go off on each other?
00:55:13.540 It was useless.
00:55:15.680 Yeah, nobody
00:55:16.400 I don't think either of them
00:55:18.020 looked good.
00:55:20.420 It was two completely
00:55:21.840 unreasonable people
00:55:22.880 yelling at each other.
00:55:24.360 And neither of them
00:55:25.580 there were no winners.
00:55:27.180 let's just say
00:55:29.160 it didn't look good
00:55:29.920 for either one of them.
00:55:32.240 It would have been
00:55:32.980 really easy
00:55:33.540 to make that
00:55:34.160 a
00:55:35.340 real conversation.
00:55:38.660 Let's call it
00:55:39.180 an RFK Jr.
00:55:40.360 kind of conversation
00:55:41.180 where people are not
00:55:42.520 just yelling at each other.
00:55:45.140 So, yeah,
00:55:45.620 to me
00:55:47.480 that was just
00:55:47.940 worthless.
00:55:51.960 All right.
00:55:53.240 He's usually
00:55:53.840 very composed.
00:55:54.640 He's very composed.
00:55:57.180 This has been
00:56:02.880 AW
00:56:05.200 what?
00:56:10.100 All right.
00:56:10.740 Well,
00:56:11.900 yeah, there were no
00:56:12.660 winners in that.
00:56:14.180 All right.
00:56:17.880 Yeah.
00:56:20.500 Who's the best
00:56:21.380 podcasters now?
00:56:22.420 Who are your favorite
00:56:25.540 let's say political
00:56:26.880 podcasters?
00:56:28.120 Well, me, of course,
00:56:29.580 but not counting me.
00:56:32.580 Show me your favorites,
00:56:34.280 Roseanne.
00:56:37.140 Dave Rubin,
00:56:39.140 Bongino,
00:56:40.780 Pac-Man,
00:56:42.300 Tim Pool,
00:56:44.000 Grinwald,
00:56:45.000 Barnes,
00:56:45.880 Carolla,
00:56:46.300 J-R-E,
00:56:49.560 Shapiro,
00:56:50.580 Levin,
00:56:51.440 Sticks,
00:56:53.100 Kelly.
00:56:54.260 Well, there's quite a
00:56:54.860 few of them.
00:56:55.740 Matt Walsh,
00:56:56.900 Theo,
00:56:58.500 Viva,
00:57:00.660 Jimmy Dore,
00:57:01.440 Dr. Drew,
00:57:03.520 Tim Dillon.
00:57:04.800 Wow.
00:57:04.980 So I asked the other
00:57:07.320 day if somebody
00:57:08.140 would make a sort
00:57:09.540 of a TV
00:57:10.320 viewing schedule
00:57:12.340 that would include
00:57:14.040 those podcasters
00:57:15.120 because a number
00:57:16.120 of us do a show
00:57:17.200 at the same time
00:57:17.940 or the same time
00:57:19.540 every day.
00:57:20.520 Wouldn't you like
00:57:21.060 to see the master
00:57:21.740 list of who
00:57:23.220 is when?
00:57:24.660 Because I don't
00:57:25.100 know where I would
00:57:25.620 go in to get that.
00:57:26.900 But somebody should
00:57:27.520 make that.
00:57:29.220 And it would help
00:57:30.260 because then somebody
00:57:31.280 who comes in with a
00:57:32.060 new show
00:57:32.560 doesn't have to
00:57:34.900 compete if they
00:57:35.740 put it in the
00:57:36.180 right place.
00:57:38.220 There should be
00:57:39.040 an actual TV
00:57:40.880 guide for
00:57:42.080 podcasters
00:57:42.940 and then it just
00:57:44.300 replaces television
00:57:45.300 entirely.
00:57:49.260 All right.
00:57:51.000 Crowder,
00:57:52.360 Joe Rogan,
00:57:53.180 Trigonometry.
00:57:54.460 You know,
00:57:54.760 as the names
00:57:55.320 are going by,
00:57:57.080 it's sorting,
00:57:58.980 it's really
00:57:59.560 sinking in
00:58:00.300 that a number
00:58:02.800 of these
00:58:03.080 podcasts are
00:58:03.780 like broadcast
00:58:04.780 TV, right?
00:58:06.720 Bongino,
00:58:09.060 Greenwald,
00:58:10.200 et cetera.
00:58:10.800 They have
00:58:11.360 old shows.
00:58:12.500 I mean,
00:58:12.660 it's just a
00:58:13.060 whole TV show.
00:58:14.880 And I'm
00:58:17.100 pretty sure
00:58:17.460 they've,
00:58:18.180 yeah,
00:58:18.380 Russell Brand,
00:58:19.120 very high
00:58:19.580 production values.
00:58:22.640 Federalist
00:58:23.040 podcast,
00:58:24.280 all right.
00:58:24.980 Well,
00:58:25.260 somebody needs
00:58:25.700 to put that
00:58:26.080 together and
00:58:26.600 tweet it at
00:58:27.120 me so I
00:58:27.520 can retweet
00:58:28.180 it for you.
00:58:28.620 If you
00:58:30.360 tweet it at
00:58:30.960 me,
00:58:31.180 I'll retweet
00:58:31.720 it.
00:58:31.960 So if
00:58:32.160 somebody wants
00:58:32.620 to take
00:58:33.220 that on,
00:58:34.060 if more
00:58:34.500 than one
00:58:34.800 of you do
00:58:35.200 it,
00:58:35.400 I'll tweet
00:58:36.080 all of them
00:58:36.640 because one
00:58:38.440 of them
00:58:38.660 would be
00:58:38.960 better than
00:58:39.340 the others
00:58:39.640 probably.
00:58:43.180 And then
00:58:43.760 keep it on
00:58:44.380 Eastern Standard
00:58:45.220 Time,
00:58:45.620 I guess.
00:58:46.560 Standardize
00:58:47.000 the time.
00:58:51.040 All right.
00:58:51.640 And Hotel
00:58:51.920 Jesus,
00:58:52.500 yes.
00:58:54.540 Andrew
00:58:54.960 Clavin.
00:58:55.780 Yeah,
00:58:56.040 there's so
00:58:56.360 many of them.
00:58:57.020 There are
00:58:57.260 probably 30
00:59:00.080 podcasts that
00:59:03.120 are quite
00:59:03.860 high quality
00:59:04.560 that you
00:59:05.140 would enjoy
00:59:05.640 in politics
00:59:06.600 and stuff.
00:59:08.200 All right.
00:59:08.480 Oh,
00:59:08.660 Dark House.
00:59:09.360 Yeah,
00:59:09.580 Zuby.
00:59:10.340 There's so
00:59:10.720 many.
00:59:11.400 I got Mark
00:59:13.020 Dice,
00:59:14.640 Tim Dillon.
00:59:15.900 So I did
00:59:16.820 agree to do
00:59:17.540 Roseanne's
00:59:18.420 podcast.
00:59:20.100 Did I tell
00:59:20.640 you all
00:59:20.920 that?
00:59:21.220 I can't
00:59:21.500 remember if
00:59:21.920 I told
00:59:22.200 you.
00:59:22.720 So I'll
00:59:23.460 do Roseanne.
00:59:24.900 We're
00:59:27.160 recording on
00:59:28.060 August 8th
00:59:30.640 or 9th
00:59:31.060 or something.
00:59:31.640 I'll let
00:59:31.940 you know
00:59:32.160 when it
00:59:32.380 gets close.
00:59:35.380 But I
00:59:36.020 don't know
00:59:36.640 yet if it
00:59:37.060 runs live
00:59:38.000 or if it's
00:59:38.520 recorded.
00:59:42.080 Yeah,
00:59:42.620 I never
00:59:43.000 close the
00:59:45.580 circuit with
00:59:46.080 Russell Brand.
00:59:47.220 But when my
00:59:48.300 next book
00:59:49.060 comes out,
00:59:49.840 Reframe Your
00:59:50.320 Brain,
00:59:50.680 which should
00:59:51.020 be out in
00:59:51.300 a few weeks,
00:59:52.420 we're getting
00:59:52.840 very close.
00:59:53.480 all the
00:59:54.100 hard stuff
00:59:54.560 is done.
00:59:55.040 We're just
00:59:55.320 working through
00:59:55.940 some details
00:59:56.580 of getting
00:59:57.600 it listed,
00:59:58.240 et cetera.
00:59:59.140 But once
01:00:00.240 the book
01:00:00.560 is available,
01:00:01.140 I'll do
01:00:01.440 some podcasts.
01:00:02.960 So that's
01:00:03.440 when I'll
01:00:03.740 reach out
01:00:04.140 to people
01:00:04.540 who have
01:00:04.780 asked me
01:00:05.280 in the
01:00:05.520 past,
01:00:06.760 but I
01:00:07.500 was not
01:00:07.900 doing them.
01:00:10.880 So Jordan
01:00:13.720 Peterson had
01:00:15.240 invited me
01:00:15.940 before I
01:00:17.620 got cancelled.
01:00:18.320 I think it
01:00:18.680 was before.
01:00:20.000 I'm not
01:00:20.600 sure he
01:00:20.880 still wants
01:00:21.360 to talk
01:00:21.640 to me,
01:00:21.920 but if
01:00:23.880 anybody
01:00:24.180 wanted to
01:00:24.680 do something
01:00:25.100 dangerous,
01:00:25.700 it would
01:00:25.860 be him.
01:00:28.540 So I'll
01:00:29.180 follow up
01:00:29.680 with Russell
01:00:30.920 Brand,
01:00:31.540 and I'll
01:00:31.780 follow up
01:00:32.220 with Jordan
01:00:34.540 Peterson and
01:00:35.420 some of the
01:00:35.960 other people
01:00:37.060 who would
01:00:37.340 ask me.
01:00:38.220 I think
01:00:38.540 Megyn Kelly
01:00:39.100 asked me
01:00:39.840 at one
01:00:40.060 point,
01:00:40.760 I believe.
01:00:43.000 So yeah,
01:00:43.820 Megyn Kelly,
01:00:44.560 I'll follow up
01:00:45.460 with her as
01:00:45.900 well.
01:00:46.800 Trigonometry,
01:00:47.460 I've never
01:00:47.840 been invited
01:00:48.460 on that.
01:00:49.020 who would
01:00:59.220 be my
01:01:00.500 best podcast
01:01:01.960 combination?
01:01:03.400 I'm thinking
01:01:04.060 it might be
01:01:04.600 Roseanne.
01:01:05.900 That's why I
01:01:06.460 was so quick
01:01:07.040 to say yes.
01:01:08.560 Michael
01:01:08.860 Malice.
01:01:10.700 Okay,
01:01:11.060 there's no way
01:01:12.220 that would be
01:01:12.760 anything but
01:01:13.400 fun.
01:01:14.640 Me and
01:01:15.200 Michael
01:01:15.560 Malice.
01:01:17.360 That would
01:01:17.880 be fun.
01:01:18.160 Greg
01:01:19.000 Gottfeld,
01:01:19.600 always fun,
01:01:20.340 of course.
01:01:22.400 Lex,
01:01:23.320 would I
01:01:23.740 fit with
01:01:24.520 Lex?
01:01:26.420 Do we
01:01:27.040 have the
01:01:27.300 right energy?
01:01:28.980 Tim Ferriss,
01:01:29.600 you're saying?
01:01:30.040 Tim Ferriss
01:01:30.480 would be
01:01:30.720 great.
01:01:32.220 Love Tim
01:01:32.740 Ferriss.
01:01:36.160 Bill
01:01:36.660 Maher.
01:01:39.800 Still,
01:01:40.780 isn't it
01:01:41.260 weird that
01:01:41.860 I haven't
01:01:44.120 been invited
01:01:44.680 to Bill
01:01:45.220 Maher's
01:01:45.700 club,
01:01:47.200 Brandon?
01:01:48.680 I don't
01:01:49.180 know who
01:01:49.800 would be
01:01:50.060 more an
01:01:50.600 ideal person
01:01:51.500 to be on
01:01:51.940 that than
01:01:52.380 me,
01:01:52.740 but oh
01:01:53.620 well.
01:01:56.220 Tim Poole.
01:01:58.420 Yeah,
01:01:58.880 I should
01:01:59.140 talk to
01:02:00.160 Tim.
01:02:02.220 I think
01:02:02.780 his guests
01:02:03.220 have to be
01:02:03.620 in person,
01:02:04.140 right?
01:02:04.920 Does he
01:02:05.300 like most
01:02:05.720 of his
01:02:05.960 guests to
01:02:06.320 be there
01:02:06.600 in person?
01:02:06.940 I might
01:02:08.560 do some
01:02:08.880 traveling,
01:02:09.340 we'll see.
01:02:10.520 Haven't
01:02:10.820 decided.
01:02:11.900 All right,
01:02:12.220 that's all
01:02:12.520 for now.
01:02:13.060 Thanks for
01:02:13.640 joining.
01:02:14.720 And YouTube,
01:02:15.400 I will see
01:02:15.860 you tomorrow.
01:02:16.460 Stay awesome.