Real Coffee with Scott Adams - August 03, 2023


Episode 2189 Scott Adams: Which Powerful Leader Goes Too Jail First? This Will Be A Good One


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 9 minutes

Words per minute

142.31775

Word count

9,913

Sentence count

777

Harmful content

Misogyny

21

sentences flagged

Toxicity

45

sentences flagged

Hate speech

26

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

I accidentally live streamed a live show for the first time on YouTube, and it's the best show you'll ever see! I accidentally hit the live button, so we're actually live, and we're in the show.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Toxicity classifications generated with s-nlp/roberta_toxicity_classifier .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.960 Oh, did I accidentally turn on this live stream
00:00:04.260 when I was trying to actually take a profile picture?
00:00:09.860 Yeah, it looks like that actually happened.
00:00:14.040 So I guess it's just us.
00:00:16.720 Greg and Big Ron.
00:00:21.680 So the interface on this, on YouTube,
00:00:26.680 when you first turn it on
00:00:28.720 and it gets ready for the live stream,
00:00:30.860 the first thing it does
00:00:31.960 is it asks you for your profile picture
00:00:35.840 and you can change it.
00:00:37.660 And I was just changing it
00:00:39.140 except I pushed the live stream button
00:00:41.480 instead of the profile picture.
00:00:44.700 So you've got two choices.
00:00:48.700 You can hang with me for seven minutes
00:00:52.120 or you can come back in seven minutes.
00:00:56.520 You have two choices.
00:00:57.640 And the worst thing is
00:00:59.460 that this is what gets turned into the podcast.
00:01:04.460 But as luck would have it,
00:01:06.800 Spotify seems to have erased my account.
00:01:10.160 Don't know why yet.
00:01:11.860 But I disappeared yesterday from all podcasting
00:01:14.580 and the account that I used uploaded on Spotify.
00:01:18.620 It's a special, special account for podcasters.
00:01:21.200 It wiped my account.
00:01:26.020 Turned it into some other account with nothing in it.
00:01:31.020 So what we're going to do
00:01:33.060 is going to keep you going
00:01:35.000 and I'm going to have to do a few things here
00:01:38.040 to get ready for the locals crowd
00:01:41.040 and to print out my notes.
00:01:43.340 So you're going to see what the locals people see every day,
00:01:45.660 which is me getting ready for the show.
00:01:53.200 And I just realized I didn't have my microphone on.
00:01:58.400 Could you even hear me talking?
00:02:04.480 Premature
00:02:04.880 live streaming.
00:02:08.160 All right.
00:02:09.380 Well,
00:02:10.580 all right.
00:02:10.880 So here's my process,
00:02:12.120 in case you're wondering.
00:02:13.340 Right before showtime,
00:02:15.380 first thing I do is open up the locals people
00:02:20.140 because they usually get a preview,
00:02:23.140 but you're getting the preview now.
00:02:27.100 Now you can see what it's all about.
00:02:28.900 So they get to chat with me before I go live.
00:02:33.120 Tell me what I should be doing
00:02:34.340 and what I shouldn't be doing.
00:02:37.220 All right.
00:02:38.260 Let's call her up. 0.97
00:02:41.740 And I got to print out some notes
00:02:43.460 and send out a tweet.
00:02:49.360 But,
00:02:50.140 why is that light doing that?
00:02:52.540 Okay.
00:02:52.700 Okay.
00:02:52.800 This is also when I adjust the lighting.
00:03:03.000 So you get to see the whole process.
00:03:07.280 Let's bring in the locals people.
00:03:14.800 Hello, locals people. 0.96
00:03:16.720 So I did a dumb thing.
00:03:18.100 I accidentally hit the live button on YouTube
00:03:22.300 so we're actually live.
00:03:23.940 This is the show.
00:03:25.420 So we're right in the show.
00:03:28.020 No warm-up period today.
00:03:30.100 However,
00:03:30.840 at the top of the hour,
00:03:32.340 I'm going to pretend I'm starting the show.
00:03:34.860 But this,
00:03:36.760 today only,
00:03:38.540 the YouTube people
00:03:39.720 and the locals people
00:03:40.880 are on at the same time.
00:03:42.960 Same time.
00:03:43.980 So we're just going to go with it.
00:03:45.660 I got to print out my notes.
00:03:47.520 It's going to be the best show
00:03:48.420 you've ever seen since yesterday.
00:03:50.980 Well, yesterday is pretty good.
00:03:53.300 Today is going to be even better.
00:03:56.560 I woke up at 2.30 this morning.
00:04:00.880 No reason.
00:04:01.840 I just wasn't tired.
00:04:03.840 Do you ever wake up at 2.30
00:04:05.500 and you just say,
00:04:06.580 oh, hell,
00:04:07.900 I'll just get up.
00:04:09.960 Two and a half hours of sleep.
00:04:11.420 That was plenty.
00:04:14.720 No, it was actually three and a half.
00:04:16.160 Three and a half is plenty.
00:04:16.940 All right.
00:04:19.380 I got my notes.
00:04:20.520 All I need to do is tweet
00:04:21.960 and we're going to be good to go.
00:04:26.280 Or as I call it,
00:04:27.780 post.
00:04:28.800 Not tweeting.
00:04:30.140 Posting.
00:04:30.540 I don't know if it's worth
00:04:37.120 even posting over in truth.
00:04:40.860 I don't have any sense
00:04:42.040 that anybody comes from that source,
00:04:44.040 but we'll do it anyway.
00:04:47.340 All right.
00:04:48.160 I've tweeted.
00:04:48.860 I've done lights.
00:04:49.580 I'm going to take off
00:04:51.500 my microphone for a moment.
00:04:52.840 I'm going to take off
00:04:53.560 my microphone for a moment.
00:05:19.580 Tell me the truth.
00:05:28.220 Do I have the best
00:05:29.200 situation for a rolling chair?
00:05:32.160 Let me just look at this.
00:05:32.960 The best.
00:05:53.600 All right.
00:05:56.380 And that's why I don't have carpet.
00:05:58.740 No carpet.
00:05:59.840 It's got to be all pushing chairs.
00:06:01.320 All right.
00:06:02.360 Here's a true story
00:06:03.180 before we go live.
00:06:05.140 I want you to picture this.
00:06:06.840 I'm going to draw you
00:06:07.440 a little image with words.
00:06:11.340 When I was a kid,
00:06:12.880 I used to get,
00:06:13.760 I used to get babysitted
00:06:16.100 by my grandmother.
00:06:17.360 And she lived on a farm,
00:06:18.920 my uncle's farm,
00:06:20.480 that was walking distance
00:06:21.760 from where I lived.
00:06:23.660 And she would have,
00:06:26.500 she mostly lived
00:06:27.840 in one little part
00:06:29.260 of the farmhouse,
00:06:30.340 one room.
00:06:31.980 And the one room
00:06:33.740 that she lived in,
00:06:35.500 she liked to quilt.
00:06:38.480 So a quilt is pretty big.
00:06:40.120 If you've ever seen
00:06:40.720 somebody quilting,
00:06:42.100 they have to stretch out
00:06:43.320 the entire quilt,
00:06:45.060 you know,
00:06:45.840 the size of a,
00:06:46.700 I guess,
00:06:47.540 a quilt,
00:06:48.460 which took up,
00:06:50.720 I'd say,
00:06:51.740 80% of the center
00:06:53.140 of the room.
00:06:53.640 So the only,
00:06:56.060 the only space
00:06:57.860 you could walk
00:06:58.640 in this room,
00:06:59.400 remember,
00:07:00.760 I had to stay there
00:07:01.700 all day.
00:07:03.540 I'm a little kid,
00:07:05.020 and I have to stay here
00:07:06.200 all day in this room
00:07:07.400 with a quilt
00:07:08.700 taking up 80%
00:07:09.960 of the center.
00:07:10.740 So the only place
00:07:11.660 that you could walk
00:07:12.540 or be
00:07:13.540 was around the outside
00:07:14.580 of the quilt.
00:07:15.200 because, you know,
00:07:16.820 the weather was bad.
00:07:18.860 So my grandmother,
00:07:20.080 who was a very
00:07:20.760 obese woman, 0.99
00:07:23.860 she had a, 0.70
00:07:24.500 she had an office chair
00:07:26.320 that she would push
00:07:27.080 around to work
00:07:27.920 on the quilt.
00:07:28.420 So all day long
00:07:29.800 I had to get up
00:07:30.420 and move
00:07:30.860 because grandma
00:07:31.720 was moving the quilt
00:07:32.680 or moving her chair. 0.99
00:07:35.000 All right.
00:07:36.040 We are live
00:07:38.000 because I accidentally
00:07:39.620 started early.
00:07:41.000 So I'm going to pretend
00:07:42.400 as if we didn't start early
00:07:44.800 because this is
00:07:45.780 the starting time.
00:07:48.100 And just go with it.
00:07:50.500 As far as you know,
00:07:52.100 I just turned it on
00:07:53.560 and you haven't seen
00:07:54.400 anything until now.
00:07:56.580 Do, do, do, do, do, do.
00:07:58.420 Do, do, do, do, do, do.
00:08:00.500 Do, do, do, do, do, do, do, do.
00:08:03.900 Do, do, do, do, do.
00:08:06.960 Good morning, everybody.
00:08:08.500 And welcome to the highlight
00:08:10.280 of human civilization
00:08:11.400 where all questions
00:08:12.760 are answered,
00:08:14.080 all mysteries are solved.
00:08:16.580 And I'll tell you
00:08:17.540 exactly what to do
00:08:18.500 in the future
00:08:18.980 if you'd like this experience
00:08:20.420 to go up to levels
00:08:21.320 where nobody's ever
00:08:22.940 seen them before.
00:08:24.380 All you need is
00:08:25.180 a cup or a mug
00:08:25.780 or a glass,
00:08:26.540 a tank or a chalice,
00:08:27.240 a canteen,
00:08:27.920 jug or a flask,
00:08:29.000 a vessel of any kind,
00:08:30.860 fill it with your
00:08:31.520 favorite liquid.
00:08:33.220 I like coffee.
00:08:34.560 And join me now
00:08:35.360 for the unparalleled
00:08:36.520 pleasure of the dopamine
00:08:37.660 of the day,
00:08:38.320 the thing that makes
00:08:38.840 everything better.
00:08:39.760 It's called
00:08:40.140 the simultaneous sip.
00:08:42.240 It happens now.
00:08:43.120 Go.
00:08:43.280 Go.
00:08:47.720 Ah.
00:08:49.840 Better than usual.
00:08:52.640 That's just the way
00:08:53.540 I like it.
00:08:54.860 Above average.
00:08:55.820 All right.
00:08:59.560 Let's see what's going on.
00:09:00.820 Are you following
00:09:01.480 the drama
00:09:02.560 with the room temperature
00:09:04.680 superconductive material?
00:09:07.380 I told you about it
00:09:08.400 the other day
00:09:09.000 that there was
00:09:09.600 one researcher
00:09:10.840 who said,
00:09:12.120 oh,
00:09:12.380 we can make
00:09:12.920 superconductivity
00:09:14.080 at room temperature.
00:09:15.460 Now,
00:09:15.860 if that were true,
00:09:17.600 it would change
00:09:18.660 civilization.
00:09:20.100 Now,
00:09:20.680 it's hard to explain why,
00:09:21.960 but you could
00:09:23.060 fundamentally do
00:09:23.940 things with
00:09:24.780 electronics
00:09:25.620 that would be
00:09:26.720 impossible otherwise.
00:09:28.460 So,
00:09:28.980 you could have
00:09:29.360 your quantum computing
00:09:30.480 and you could have
00:09:31.520 your lossless
00:09:32.460 energy transmission
00:09:33.680 and God knows what.
00:09:35.740 Right?
00:09:35.960 So,
00:09:36.180 it just really
00:09:37.060 would change everything.
00:09:38.220 But,
00:09:39.760 it would have to be true.
00:09:41.700 If it's not true,
00:09:43.180 it doesn't change anything.
00:09:44.940 So,
00:09:45.600 there was so much
00:09:46.420 interest that a
00:09:47.380 group got together
00:09:48.500 just to see if
00:09:49.220 they could replicate it.
00:09:50.220 So,
00:09:51.080 scientists are
00:09:52.220 trying to replicate it
00:09:54.760 right now.
00:09:55.560 And here's the
00:09:56.200 interesting thing.
00:09:59.460 Apparently,
00:10:00.320 they can.
00:10:02.040 Apparently,
00:10:02.900 they can.
00:10:04.020 Now,
00:10:04.500 I'm not,
00:10:05.060 I don't think we can
00:10:06.580 quite conclude it yet,
00:10:09.040 but the reports
00:10:10.240 are coming in
00:10:11.120 that they are
00:10:13.040 successfully
00:10:13.900 replicating it
00:10:15.020 in different places.
00:10:18.400 That is amazing.
00:10:20.220 It's amazing.
00:10:22.640 Now,
00:10:23.420 I'm still not
00:10:24.740 quite ready
00:10:25.760 to say it's all true.
00:10:27.920 Right?
00:10:28.400 Because,
00:10:28.920 you know,
00:10:29.520 it could be like
00:10:30.400 fusion.
00:10:31.000 You always think
00:10:31.480 you're there
00:10:31.840 and then you're not.
00:10:32.940 Flying cars,
00:10:34.180 we're almost there,
00:10:36.020 but not.
00:10:37.080 So,
00:10:37.420 maybe,
00:10:38.660 maybe.
00:10:39.580 Now,
00:10:39.780 remember,
00:10:40.280 the big deal
00:10:40.880 about this
00:10:41.380 is not just
00:10:42.060 that it would be
00:10:42.620 a miracle
00:10:44.080 of technology.
00:10:45.000 the big deal
00:10:46.440 about it
00:10:46.840 is that the
00:10:47.360 materials to do
00:10:48.480 it are common.
00:10:51.600 It's common 0.96
00:10:52.280 materials.
00:10:53.580 Apparently,
00:10:54.160 they could ramp
00:10:54.700 it up.
00:10:56.140 If this thing
00:10:57.080 works,
00:10:58.180 the ramp up
00:10:58.960 will be
00:10:59.740 maybe astonishing.
00:11:01.220 You know,
00:11:01.340 the startups
00:11:01.820 will just
00:11:02.340 appear out of
00:11:02.960 nowhere.
00:11:03.920 So,
00:11:04.240 we'll see.
00:11:04.740 There could be
00:11:05.140 some amazing
00:11:05.780 stuff coming.
00:11:06.860 Speaking of
00:11:07.540 amazing stuff,
00:11:08.460 RFK Jr.,
00:11:09.500 in a tweet,
00:11:13.660 he's saying
00:11:14.100 that if he's
00:11:14.640 elected,
00:11:15.180 he will end
00:11:15.760 chronic disease
00:11:16.820 in this country.
00:11:19.120 That's pretty good.
00:11:21.420 Do you think
00:11:22.220 he could do it?
00:11:23.560 I think what
00:11:24.460 he would be
00:11:24.920 aiming at
00:11:25.520 would be
00:11:26.280 the food supply
00:11:27.340 and our
00:11:28.900 pharmaceutical
00:11:29.540 products.
00:11:31.860 His belief
00:11:32.900 is that the
00:11:33.580 combination of
00:11:34.260 those two,
00:11:34.900 I think I'm
00:11:36.400 characterizing
00:11:37.020 this right.
00:11:37.960 I think his
00:11:38.500 belief that
00:11:39.120 in all
00:11:40.160 likelihood,
00:11:41.700 some combination
00:11:42.880 of pharmaceuticals
00:11:44.760 plus our
00:11:45.200 food supply
00:11:45.860 are causing
00:11:46.660 all kinds
00:11:47.100 of inflammation
00:11:47.760 and chronic
00:11:48.480 diseases.
00:11:49.740 I think he's
00:11:50.720 right.
00:11:52.120 I don't know
00:11:52.860 how solvable
00:11:53.520 that is,
00:11:55.040 but I think
00:11:55.580 he's right.
00:11:56.620 And I have
00:11:57.540 a prediction.
00:11:59.420 It goes
00:11:59.920 like this.
00:12:01.360 Someday,
00:12:02.120 somebody's
00:12:02.540 going to make
00:12:02.980 a personal
00:12:04.080 indoor farming
00:12:05.340 product that's
00:12:07.480 scalable and
00:12:08.720 modular and
00:12:09.800 it works.
00:12:12.240 So that your
00:12:13.040 house can
00:12:13.780 grow most
00:12:15.160 of, you know,
00:12:15.800 maybe 80%
00:12:16.560 of the food
00:12:17.000 you need.
00:12:18.480 But at the
00:12:20.080 moment, you
00:12:20.560 would need too
00:12:20.960 much space and
00:12:21.940 energy and all
00:12:22.640 that.
00:12:23.300 But I don't
00:12:23.780 think that's
00:12:24.220 going to last.
00:12:24.840 I feel like
00:12:27.160 if we build
00:12:29.500 up instead of
00:12:30.580 on the ground,
00:12:31.360 you know,
00:12:31.600 you do
00:12:31.860 vertical stuff,
00:12:33.580 you don't need
00:12:34.180 dirt if you
00:12:34.860 use hydroponics,
00:12:36.120 you don't need
00:12:36.720 electricity if you've
00:12:37.660 got solar.
00:12:39.300 I feel like
00:12:40.480 you don't need,
00:12:41.460 you wouldn't need
00:12:42.200 pesticides if it's
00:12:43.240 indoors.
00:12:43.620 I feel like
00:12:45.560 all the
00:12:46.200 components are
00:12:47.820 in place.
00:12:49.280 The indoor
00:12:49.820 gardening should
00:12:50.920 start working.
00:12:53.180 But I've been
00:12:54.680 saying that for
00:12:55.160 a while and it
00:12:55.680 hasn't happened
00:12:56.100 yet.
00:12:56.620 So I'll continue
00:12:58.060 to be optimistic
00:12:58.920 that we can end
00:13:00.400 chronic disease by
00:13:01.520 growing our own
00:13:02.160 food.
00:13:03.340 Correct me if I'm
00:13:04.040 wrong, but the
00:13:05.800 reason that our
00:13:06.460 food supply is
00:13:08.120 allegedly so
00:13:09.520 unhealthy would be
00:13:10.800 because of all the
00:13:11.500 additives.
00:13:12.620 Am I right?
00:13:13.740 It's the pesticides
00:13:14.520 and the additives.
00:13:16.260 If you're just
00:13:17.000 eating the food
00:13:17.940 and it's fresh
00:13:19.100 off the vine,
00:13:20.660 isn't it going to
00:13:21.320 taste delicious?
00:13:22.600 You wouldn't have
00:13:23.360 to add a lot of
00:13:23.940 sugars, you wouldn't 1.00
00:13:25.520 have to add a lot
00:13:26.200 of salt unless you
00:13:27.560 liked it.
00:13:28.860 I feel if you're
00:13:29.780 eating it off the
00:13:30.380 vine, I don't know
00:13:31.420 how many of you
00:13:31.960 have ever had this
00:13:32.920 experience.
00:13:34.060 You buy a tomato
00:13:35.300 in the grocery
00:13:35.960 store and you eat
00:13:38.020 it and you say to
00:13:39.000 yourself, I don't
00:13:40.620 know why anybody
00:13:41.320 buys tomatoes.
00:13:43.380 They just taste
00:13:44.220 like cardboard
00:13:44.840 and that's because
00:13:46.240 they come off the
00:13:47.040 vine green and
00:13:48.020 they gas it to
00:13:48.940 make it red. 0.98
00:13:49.920 So it's not even
00:13:50.840 vine ripened most
00:13:51.780 of the time.
00:13:53.420 But if you grow
00:13:54.320 your own tomatoes,
00:13:55.240 how many of you
00:13:55.840 have had this
00:13:56.320 experience?
00:13:57.620 You take one
00:13:58.480 off the vine,
00:13:59.300 you cut it in half,
00:14:00.160 you put a little
00:14:00.640 salt on it and
00:14:02.120 you think you've
00:14:02.780 eaten the best
00:14:03.780 thing you've ever
00:14:04.600 had in your mouth. 0.61
00:14:06.160 The difference
00:14:06.960 between a grocery
00:14:08.120 store tomato that
00:14:09.220 really you shouldn't
00:14:09.960 eat at all.
00:14:11.220 There's no right
00:14:12.140 time to eat a
00:14:12.780 grocery store tomato.
00:14:14.880 Maybe if it's a
00:14:16.260 greenhouse tomato or
00:14:17.240 something, but the
00:14:18.380 gas ripened ones,
00:14:20.020 never.
00:14:21.160 There's no time to
00:14:22.040 eat that.
00:14:22.680 There's not enough
00:14:23.320 nutrition in it that
00:14:24.280 you should bother and
00:14:26.120 won't taste good.
00:14:28.300 So home farming
00:14:29.780 solves a lot of
00:14:30.820 problems if we can
00:14:31.560 get there.
00:14:31.900 Well, you probably
00:14:34.260 heard that the
00:14:34.860 rating agency Fitch
00:14:36.360 has downgraded the
00:14:38.100 U.S. credit rating
00:14:38.980 from 2AA plus from
00:14:42.040 AAA.
00:14:43.100 So that would put us
00:14:44.060 around fifth or so
00:14:46.060 of developed nations
00:14:48.020 in credit ranking.
00:14:49.580 So we'd have places
00:14:50.860 like Sweden would be 0.97
00:14:51.860 above us, I think.
00:14:54.000 And I don't know
00:14:56.280 what to think about
00:14:56.960 this.
00:14:58.040 Now, obviously,
00:14:58.820 the Biden
00:14:59.320 administration blamed
00:15:00.740 to the Trump
00:15:01.320 administration, and
00:15:02.800 everybody kind of
00:15:03.580 laughed, but maybe
00:15:04.640 it's a little bit
00:15:05.260 true as well.
00:15:06.640 Because I don't
00:15:07.200 think any of our
00:15:08.920 presidents did a
00:15:09.780 good job on debt,
00:15:12.460 did they?
00:15:14.200 Who was the
00:15:15.020 president who did a
00:15:15.820 good job on debt?
00:15:17.260 I don't remember
00:15:17.900 one.
00:15:19.140 Clinton?
00:15:19.800 Bill Clinton?
00:15:21.420 Bill Clinton, right?
00:15:22.580 Wasn't he the last
00:15:23.240 one?
00:15:25.160 Weirdly.
00:15:26.100 Yeah.
00:15:27.020 So I would say
00:15:29.000 there's some blame
00:15:29.700 to share on that
00:15:30.600 one, but if you're
00:15:31.700 the party that's
00:15:32.420 been in power for
00:15:33.440 two and a half
00:15:34.520 years, you've got
00:15:35.760 a little bit more
00:15:36.640 explaining than the
00:15:37.500 one who's out of
00:15:38.660 power.
00:15:41.940 Now, although I
00:15:43.500 have a, as I tell
00:15:45.160 you too often, a
00:15:46.340 degree in economics,
00:15:48.340 and I've got an
00:15:48.860 MBA from a top
00:15:49.880 school, but I have
00:15:52.700 no idea what this
00:15:53.980 debt downgrade means
00:15:57.300 in terms of the
00:15:58.280 real world.
00:15:58.800 now, obviously, you
00:16:01.140 should make interest
00:16:01.860 rates go up, because
00:16:03.860 the higher interest
00:16:05.080 rates compensate for
00:16:06.480 the risk of, you
00:16:07.860 know, the entire
00:16:08.620 thing.
00:16:09.620 So we should see
00:16:10.980 higher interest
00:16:11.620 rates.
00:16:13.260 But we have this
00:16:14.240 weird situation where
00:16:15.200 the economy is kind
00:16:16.220 of strong.
00:16:17.740 So you've got a
00:16:18.760 generally strong
00:16:19.620 economy with good
00:16:20.640 employment, but you've
00:16:22.620 got a really serious
00:16:24.480 problem with the debt
00:16:25.560 and with the debt and
00:16:26.820 the interest rates and
00:16:27.680 stuff.
00:16:28.780 I don't know.
00:16:30.040 I don't know what the
00:16:31.640 net of this is.
00:16:33.280 So I've decided not to
00:16:34.660 worry about it.
00:16:37.580 I'm not sure that's
00:16:38.560 rational, but I don't
00:16:39.980 know what else I'm going
00:16:40.740 to do.
00:16:41.560 Am I going to go out and
00:16:42.460 do something different?
00:16:45.300 Am I going to act
00:16:46.260 different today?
00:16:46.960 So one of the things I
00:16:49.600 do to maintain my
00:16:50.960 sanity is if there's
00:16:54.180 something I can't do
00:16:55.040 anything about, and
00:16:56.520 this seems to be in
00:16:57.280 that category, I don't
00:16:59.200 worry about it.
00:17:00.840 There's nothing I can
00:17:01.840 do.
00:17:03.580 How many of you are
00:17:06.000 able to do that?
00:17:08.260 I just do not worry
00:17:09.920 about things I can't
00:17:10.960 have any control over.
00:17:12.880 So there's, you know,
00:17:13.740 what is it, Desiderado,
00:17:14.880 the famous saying, you
00:17:16.240 know, don't worry about
00:17:16.900 the things you can't
00:17:17.720 control, but the things
00:17:19.400 you can control, like
00:17:22.320 your fitness, your
00:17:23.340 exercise, your diet, you
00:17:25.320 should control the hell
00:17:26.920 out of those.
00:17:29.020 That's the best advice
00:17:30.160 I'll ever give you.
00:17:31.280 If you can't control it,
00:17:33.040 stop worrying about it.
00:17:34.600 You'll have to deal with
00:17:35.520 it if something goes
00:17:36.200 wrong.
00:17:36.680 If there's something you
00:17:37.720 can do to prepare, go
00:17:39.580 ahead and do it.
00:17:40.520 But if there's nothing
00:17:41.500 you can do, let it go.
00:17:44.640 Because the world is full
00:17:46.000 of things that there's
00:17:47.240 nothing you can do.
00:17:48.680 If a meteor is going to
00:17:50.360 come out of the sky 0.99
00:17:51.000 tomorrow and kill you, 1.00
00:17:53.260 well, there's nothing 1.00
00:17:53.900 you can do.
00:17:54.540 I mean, if you didn't
00:17:55.360 know about it.
00:17:56.740 So don't worry about
00:17:57.740 things there's nothing
00:17:58.440 you can do about.
00:17:59.220 This death thing is one
00:18:00.140 of them.
00:18:01.260 But do worry about
00:18:02.360 those things you can
00:18:03.160 control and control
00:18:04.420 them like crazy.
00:18:05.480 You'll be much happier.
00:18:07.140 Fitness and exercise
00:18:08.160 at the top of the list.
00:18:10.140 All right.
00:18:10.360 So the current makeup
00:18:11.760 of the Republican
00:18:12.660 and Democrat Party
00:18:13.880 is starting to become
00:18:15.760 clear.
00:18:17.100 How many of you
00:18:17.980 remember that maybe
00:18:19.720 it was 2016 the first
00:18:21.500 time I said that the
00:18:23.180 Democrat Party is the 0.94
00:18:24.900 woman party and the 1.00
00:18:27.620 Republicans are becoming
00:18:28.620 a male party?
00:18:30.120 And it turns out the
00:18:31.220 numbers are backing that,
00:18:32.660 but it's not exactly that.
00:18:34.080 It has more to do with
00:18:34.900 married versus unmarried.
00:18:36.180 And, well, here are the
00:18:39.180 stats.
00:18:41.300 Republicans have more
00:18:43.500 married men by 20
00:18:44.880 points and more married
00:18:47.100 women by 14 points. 0.96
00:18:49.300 So if you're married,
00:18:50.520 you're far more likely to
00:18:51.920 be a Republican at the
00:18:53.360 moment.
00:18:53.920 Now, that could have to
00:18:54.640 do with age.
00:18:56.700 Age could be a big part
00:18:57.700 of that because Republicans
00:18:58.920 are older.
00:19:01.560 But single women are the 1.00
00:19:03.580 biggest category, I guess,
00:19:06.180 and the Democrats, we're
00:19:07.100 the big standout category.
00:19:09.200 So what happens if you
00:19:11.400 have one political party
00:19:12.600 that is dominated by the
00:19:16.000 opinions of married
00:19:17.120 people, both male and
00:19:18.800 female, both male and
00:19:21.040 female, but married? 0.83
00:19:23.540 And you compare that to a
00:19:25.120 political party that would
00:19:26.160 be dominated by, not
00:19:27.920 entirely, but dominated by
00:19:29.460 single women.
00:19:30.640 And I would like you to put
00:19:33.600 on your most bigoted, 0.98
00:19:35.160 awful hat. 1.00
00:19:37.620 Oh, just be a jerk for a 1.00
00:19:39.920 minute. 1.00
00:19:40.280 Can you? 1.00
00:19:41.840 Just be a jerk for a 1.00
00:19:44.300 minute. 1.00
00:19:45.640 Which of those two groups is
00:19:47.240 going to make better
00:19:47.840 decisions?
00:19:49.160 Single women or married 0.95
00:19:51.120 people, both male and
00:19:52.320 female? 0.98
00:19:52.580 What do you think?
00:19:59.880 Would you trust decisions
00:20:01.400 that were made primarily by
00:20:02.800 single women? 1.00
00:20:06.040 And I'm asking you to put
00:20:07.580 on your most bigoted,
00:20:09.600 biased hat.
00:20:12.620 Because you know what?
00:20:14.140 It's not really about male
00:20:15.560 versus female. 0.99
00:20:17.120 Because like I said, the
00:20:19.280 married people seem to be on 0.99
00:20:20.620 one side, you know, a
00:20:21.820 little bit more than the
00:20:23.360 other side.
00:20:24.540 And the single people seem
00:20:25.900 to be on the other side,
00:20:26.720 except not the men.
00:20:29.100 But I could have asked the
00:20:30.300 same question.
00:20:31.140 Let me reverse the
00:20:32.160 question.
00:20:33.220 Suppose the situation was
00:20:35.300 that one of the parties,
00:20:36.460 it doesn't matter which one,
00:20:37.640 it's just hypothetical, was
00:20:39.600 dominated by single men.
00:20:42.720 Single men. 0.56
00:20:44.000 And let's say the other
00:20:44.900 party had all the single
00:20:46.180 women and had all the 1.00
00:20:47.840 married people, male and
00:20:49.060 female.
00:20:49.300 But one of the parties was
00:20:50.900 mostly single men.
00:20:52.920 Would you trust their
00:20:54.060 political decisions?
00:20:56.280 Single men. 0.56
00:20:58.520 I wouldn't.
00:21:00.080 Are you kidding? 1.00
00:21:01.480 Are you freaking crazy? 1.00
00:21:03.300 Have you ever met a single 1.00
00:21:04.620 man?
00:21:06.020 Single men are the most 1.00
00:21:07.320 reckless, untrustworthy 0.97
00:21:09.040 group of people I can even 0.85
00:21:10.340 imagine.
00:21:11.160 There's only one group I can
00:21:12.460 imagine that would be as
00:21:13.940 untrustworthy as a bunch of
00:21:15.820 single men.
00:21:16.440 men.
00:21:18.140 It would be single women. 1.00
00:21:21.060 Yeah.
00:21:21.860 Single women. 0.65
00:21:24.700 Now, I'm not going to claim
00:21:26.100 that single women would make 1.00
00:21:27.660 worse decisions than single
00:21:29.220 men, but I wouldn't want 0.83
00:21:30.980 either one of them in charge.
00:21:33.280 Right.
00:21:34.000 Now, again, could I do an 0.99
00:21:36.660 aside for the dumb people? 1.00
00:21:38.080 Are there any dumb people 1.00
00:21:39.040 here watching? 1.00
00:21:40.760 Does anybody need these 1.00
00:21:42.540 special dumb people 1.00
00:21:43.680 explanation? 1.00
00:21:45.140 I'll give it to you.
00:21:46.240 All right.
00:21:46.760 I'll need Dale.
00:21:47.360 Dale, this is true for all
00:21:50.820 conversations in which we
00:21:52.280 refer to groups or group
00:21:54.160 averages.
00:21:55.840 Why are you saying that every
00:21:57.140 single, single person has the
00:21:58.380 same?
00:21:59.820 Well, I'm not, Dale.
00:22:00.840 I'm not saying that at all.
00:22:02.720 It's more like an average
00:22:03.840 thing, you know.
00:22:06.000 But why are you saying that
00:22:07.820 every single, single person
00:22:09.900 can't make a good political
00:22:11.200 decision?
00:22:13.560 I'm literally not saying that.
00:22:15.240 I'm saying nothing like that.
00:22:17.360 Nothing like that.
00:22:19.560 Individuals, of course, are
00:22:20.540 all over the map.
00:22:21.620 It's just sort of a
00:22:22.240 generality.
00:22:24.260 And yet, you seem to think
00:22:25.640 that every single person
00:22:27.160 can't make a good decision.
00:22:30.900 And see.
00:22:33.620 So for the benefit of the 1.00
00:22:34.960 stupid people, it never 1.00
00:22:36.900 means all the people. 1.00
00:22:39.460 It never, never, it never
00:22:41.660 means all the people.
00:22:44.640 All right.
00:22:45.600 But let, all right, how
00:22:47.000 many of you have had the
00:22:47.920 experience of going from
00:22:49.280 single to married, and
00:22:50.740 especially having children,
00:22:52.240 and found that you make
00:22:53.480 different decisions and you
00:22:54.640 have different priorities
00:22:55.540 about politics?
00:22:56.780 Go.
00:22:57.560 How many of you found, as
00:23:00.020 soon as you got married,
00:23:02.080 well, you were a little more
00:23:03.660 conservative, perhaps?
00:23:06.600 Right?
00:23:07.800 So I think getting married
00:23:09.120 makes you conservative, as
00:23:11.100 well as being conservative, makes
00:23:12.700 you're perhaps more likely to
00:23:14.220 get married.
00:23:17.420 So, I would say that's a big
00:23:19.840 problem for the Democrats.
00:23:21.340 And again, if you think that's
00:23:23.180 about women versus men, it's 1.00
00:23:24.800 not.
00:23:25.860 It's about single people.
00:23:28.580 Single people, they need a 1.00
00:23:31.440 little help.
00:23:32.040 I mean, they certainly should be
00:23:33.420 part of the process, of course.
00:23:35.700 But I wouldn't trust any single
00:23:37.420 people to make decisions for the
00:23:39.520 country.
00:23:41.180 All right.
00:23:42.360 Let's talk about Devin Archer.
00:23:45.020 You're all following the story.
00:23:46.740 Hunter Biden's partner.
00:23:48.840 He's given up the goods.
00:23:51.380 But Jonathan Turley talks about
00:23:53.080 this, and on Twitter, he says
00:23:55.800 there was a discussion of a
00:23:59.460 $142,000 purchase of a luxury
00:24:02.140 car for Hunter as part of his
00:24:04.560 payments for the Burisma work, I
00:24:08.580 guess, and that the Ukrainians
00:24:12.160 wanted Hunter Biden to help
00:24:13.500 relieve pressure from the
00:24:15.540 prosecutors looking into
00:24:17.200 corruption.
00:24:18.320 They wanted the Bidens to take
00:24:19.980 the heat off.
00:24:21.660 Biden later insisted on the
00:24:23.100 firing of the prosecutor.
00:24:25.760 Now, that's interesting.
00:24:28.040 That testimony would seem to be
00:24:30.000 at odds with everything that the
00:24:33.180 mainstream media told us.
00:24:35.360 I believe the mainstream media
00:24:36.660 told us that everybody wanted
00:24:38.880 that prosecutor fired.
00:24:40.840 Oh, other countries, other
00:24:42.480 entities, organizations.
00:24:45.620 Yeah.
00:24:47.160 Everybody.
00:24:48.760 You just ask anybody.
00:24:50.480 Everybody wanted him.
00:24:51.620 But it turns out that the people
00:24:53.300 who wanted him fired the most, and
00:24:55.600 we now have documentation of that,
00:24:58.220 good, credible evidence.
00:24:59.260 The people who most wanted that
00:25:01.700 prosecutor fired were Burisma
00:25:05.400 themselves.
00:25:07.520 Burisma wanted the prosecutor
00:25:09.080 fired, asked for it specifically.
00:25:11.700 It was a priority, and they asked
00:25:13.680 the Bidens to get it done, and then
00:25:15.380 the Bidens did it.
00:25:17.200 So, point number one, it doesn't
00:25:20.760 matter how many other people thought
00:25:22.560 it was a good idea.
00:25:23.840 There's a very clear record that the
00:25:26.260 reason it was done is because
00:25:28.440 Burisma wanted it done, and they 1.00
00:25:29.960 were paying the Bidens to get it
00:25:31.080 done, and then it got done.
00:25:33.620 And it's really clear.
00:25:35.640 Like, there's no real doubt about it,
00:25:37.580 right?
00:25:38.480 Now, here's my question for you.
00:25:41.380 It's been how many days, and you
00:25:44.380 could argue years, that we've been
00:25:47.920 arguing about this prosecutor, and
00:25:50.400 the Democrats keep saying, but
00:25:52.420 everybody wanted him fired.
00:25:53.800 It wasn't an American thing.
00:25:56.500 Who are those other people?
00:25:59.020 Well, give me a name.
00:26:00.900 Give me an interview.
00:26:02.340 Show me one person in one big entity
00:26:05.780 anywhere who is asking for him to be
00:26:08.180 fired.
00:26:09.960 And then, once you have those names,
00:26:12.480 because there probably are some names,
00:26:14.080 once you have those names, tell me
00:26:16.460 where they got their information.
00:26:19.580 Independently?
00:26:21.020 Do you think there were a lot of
00:26:22.400 people who were asking about the
00:26:25.020 prosecutor in Ukraine?
00:26:27.460 Hey, we'd like to talk to you in
00:26:30.260 Israel, Prime Minister Netanyahu.
00:26:33.400 How do you feel about that
00:26:34.900 prosecutor in Ukraine who's going
00:26:37.300 after that company you never heard of
00:26:38.860 until recently?
00:26:41.980 It was never real.
00:26:44.380 Once you see the mechanism, you can
00:26:47.860 see it everywhere.
00:26:48.520 Do you remember the 50 Intel people who
00:26:51.400 said the laptop wasn't real?
00:26:54.580 How was that play organized?
00:26:56.740 It was organized by some prominent
00:26:58.980 Democrat, getting other Democrats who
00:27:01.900 were willing to say literally anything,
00:27:04.880 to simply say that something was true,
00:27:07.140 so that the other people could look at
00:27:08.960 the people they told to say it was
00:27:10.300 true, and say, well, it's not us, look
00:27:12.420 at all these people.
00:27:13.800 But these people they told to say it
00:27:15.360 was true.
00:27:16.380 They're not independent voices at all.
00:27:18.040 So when you do that trick, you can
00:27:21.080 launder your opinion through the
00:27:22.560 media as though it's coming from
00:27:24.400 experts, when in fact the experts were
00:27:26.640 just doing what they were told.
00:27:28.860 Now take that situation, which you know
00:27:31.080 to exist, so you know that's a play.
00:27:34.200 That's a known play.
00:27:36.660 Get a bunch of people to pretend it's
00:27:38.240 true, and then just point to them.
00:27:40.500 Now what did they do with the
00:27:42.800 prosecutor?
00:27:43.340 They got a bunch of people that they said
00:27:47.900 were other credible people to tell you
00:27:50.680 that this guy needed to be fired, so they
00:27:53.240 didn't have to make the argument
00:27:54.320 themselves.
00:27:55.340 They said, look at all these people.
00:27:57.120 Hey, come on, look at all these people.
00:27:59.280 It's the same play.
00:28:01.480 You see it, right?
00:28:03.080 Once you see their plays, you see it
00:28:05.780 everywhere.
00:28:06.220 All right, here's another one.
00:28:07.420 Remember the Democrats always do the play
00:28:09.520 where if they do something, they say the
00:28:12.420 other side is doing it, right?
00:28:14.340 Whatever they're doing, they say the
00:28:15.520 other side is doing it.
00:28:16.840 So what did they say when Biden fired
00:28:22.520 the prosecutor?
00:28:24.100 They said, oh, the other side is trying
00:28:27.700 to protect him because the prosecutor is
00:28:30.660 the problem, right?
00:28:32.340 That's the opposite of what was the
00:28:34.340 reality.
00:28:34.660 So you see them selling the opposite of
00:28:38.720 truth fairly often.
00:28:40.960 It's just what they do.
00:28:43.220 They blame the other side of doing what
00:28:45.000 they're doing.
00:28:46.100 So what they were doing is some bad
00:28:50.120 behavior with the prosecutor.
00:28:52.080 What they accuse the other side of, bad
00:28:55.200 behavior about a prosecutor.
00:28:57.300 They just blame you for whatever they're
00:28:58.980 doing.
00:29:00.220 So that's happening.
00:29:02.140 Now, what's interesting about that is
00:29:04.160 there's not really much doubt about
00:29:08.160 this, you know, this connection of
00:29:10.320 evidence.
00:29:10.900 It's really, I mean, I suppose you could
00:29:13.500 be surprised at anything, but does
00:29:16.480 anybody think this isn't very clear at
00:29:18.740 this point, just the prosecutor part?
00:29:21.820 Is there anybody who thinks that isn't
00:29:23.160 perfectly clear that that was a dirty
00:29:26.000 situation?
00:29:27.300 There's nobody, right?
00:29:28.900 Nobody can look at this evidence and
00:29:30.460 say, well, that looked okay to me.
00:29:32.140 I don't think.
00:29:35.320 All right.
00:29:37.040 So Vivek is, Ramaswamy, is today at the
00:29:41.680 courthouse where Trump's going to be
00:29:43.100 arraigned.
00:29:44.620 And I have one question about Vivek
00:29:48.340 Ramaswamy.
00:29:49.420 How many of them are there?
00:29:53.880 Does it seem to me that he's actually
00:29:55.780 physically everywhere the news is?
00:29:58.940 Like, every time there's a story, he's
00:30:00.960 standing on the steps of the building
00:30:02.640 where the news is.
00:30:04.300 How much does he travel?
00:30:07.480 What the hell is going on?
00:30:10.300 How is Vivek everywhere?
00:30:12.660 He's actually creating a, the illusion
00:30:15.620 that he's just part of every story.
00:30:18.100 He's killing it.
00:30:19.240 I'll say it again because I'm so impressed.
00:30:23.260 It's the best political campaign in my
00:30:26.220 lifetime, which is not to say he'll win because
00:30:29.440 there are lots of other factors, but it is the
00:30:31.600 best political campaign.
00:30:33.080 I mean, he's nailing it every day.
00:30:36.760 He's hitting like three top stories a day and
00:30:40.240 standing where the story is.
00:30:42.120 All three of them.
00:30:43.560 I might be making up three.
00:30:46.100 But you just, you just have to watch the show.
00:30:50.000 Compare him to anything that anybody else is doing.
00:30:53.580 You know, Trump stands out as a singular character.
00:30:57.040 But compared to Vivek, any normal person,
00:31:00.200 DeSantis or anything, he's just clearing the field.
00:31:05.060 It really is no competition in terms of
00:31:07.240 competence of campaigning.
00:31:09.700 He owns it now.
00:31:11.180 He just owns it.
00:31:14.240 All right.
00:31:17.240 Here's a, here's the funniest image.
00:31:22.020 I wanted to put an image into your mind, okay?
00:31:24.800 So you're all going to imagine this as I describe it.
00:31:27.180 And this comes from Joel Pollack.
00:31:30.200 So this is not my work.
00:31:31.920 This is Joel's.
00:31:33.300 And I'll read a quote.
00:31:35.400 There's a distinct possibility that you could see a scene
00:31:38.540 where Trump is in jail or in prison,
00:31:42.140 wins the election,
00:31:44.120 the chief justice goes to the prison,
00:31:46.780 administers the oath of office through the bars.
00:31:49.820 I added the through the bars part.
00:31:51.620 And Trump pardons himself
00:31:53.380 and walks out of prison.
00:31:55.620 Come on.
00:32:01.720 Come on.
00:32:03.640 Don't you want to see that?
00:32:06.080 I don't want, I don't want Trump to spend a day in jail,
00:32:09.220 obviously.
00:32:10.680 Yeah, I don't really want Biden to spend a day in jail either.
00:32:13.680 But would that be the best,
00:32:19.200 the best third act of any movie?
00:32:23.560 Can you imagine him winning from jail
00:32:26.140 and pardoning himself and just walking out?
00:32:29.720 Just walking out.
00:32:31.740 And can you imagine him walking out in his prison outfit?
00:32:36.080 It would be just so much funnier.
00:32:38.240 So you imagine the chief justice on the other side of the bars,
00:32:40.840 you know, and Trump's in jail.
00:32:43.860 He just takes the oath.
00:32:45.580 And then the chief justice just looks at the guard
00:32:48.260 and the guard is like,
00:32:50.540 and he just puts the key in and lets him out.
00:32:53.220 And then everybody's like,
00:32:55.120 okay, well, I guess you're free.
00:32:57.140 You know, we have to process you.
00:32:58.560 And Trump goes, ah, don't bother.
00:33:00.900 Well, we have to, you know,
00:33:01.780 give you back your clothes or whatever.
00:33:04.000 Ah, I got other clothes.
00:33:05.520 And he just walks like down the hallway
00:33:07.580 and they just open the front door
00:33:10.020 and probably lots of security doors.
00:33:12.400 They just open all the security doors
00:33:14.040 until he gets to the front
00:33:15.080 and he just walks out.
00:33:16.980 He just walks out in his orange,
00:33:18.620 you know, unfair prosecution jumpsuit.
00:33:24.180 It would be the greatest moment
00:33:25.880 in politics and entertainment
00:33:28.880 at the same time.
00:33:30.860 And it would be the best movie
00:33:32.560 anybody ever wrote.
00:33:33.860 And there wouldn't be a movie.
00:33:35.460 Oh, there would be a movie.
00:33:36.580 Now, this, of course,
00:33:39.160 I don't want to wish him into jail
00:33:40.460 because that would require him being in jail
00:33:42.560 and I don't think that's really a risk. 0.84
00:33:45.200 All right, let's talk about all the crazy people.
00:33:47.660 Bill Barr did a double mind reading today in the news.
00:33:51.400 So here are the two things
00:33:52.720 that Bill Barr says he knows.
00:33:54.820 He's quite certain that Trump
00:33:56.540 knew he lost the election.
00:33:59.840 That's based on what?
00:34:01.980 He's quite sure that Trump knew
00:34:05.180 in his inner mind, unspoken mind,
00:34:08.920 that he knew.
00:34:11.500 That's based on pillow talk, possibly magic.
00:34:18.600 Magic? Ouija boards?
00:34:21.200 Mind reading. Mind reading, yes.
00:34:23.400 So that's mind reading.
00:34:24.980 But does he have any other mind reading?
00:34:26.880 Well, it turns out he has an opinion
00:34:28.380 about the prosecutor, Jack Smith,
00:34:30.740 who Bill Barr believes that Jack Smith
00:34:32.700 is really an unbiased prosecutor.
00:34:37.360 How does he know that?
00:34:38.820 How does he know that in this case,
00:34:40.740 specifically, Jack Smith is unbiased?
00:34:43.200 How does he know that?
00:34:44.980 Is it the Ouija board again?
00:34:47.880 Is he reading entrails,
00:34:51.360 telepathy, mind reading?
00:34:54.720 It's mind reading, right?
00:34:55.720 So he managed to put two mind reading statements
00:34:59.460 into one story that CNN ran
00:35:02.860 without fact-checking that people can't read minds.
00:35:07.040 Now, of course, it was an opinion.
00:35:09.360 But it's an opinion about what somebody else
00:35:11.820 is thinking in their private mind.
00:35:14.840 How many of you believe that Trump
00:35:16.780 privately believes he lost the election?
00:35:19.780 Privately.
00:35:20.660 His own mind.
00:35:22.040 How many believe that's true?
00:35:23.160 Now, also, it seemed to me
00:35:27.840 that Bill Barr was playing with language.
00:35:31.960 Because when he says he believes
00:35:33.480 Trump knew he lost,
00:35:35.940 lost,
00:35:37.620 lost.
00:35:39.100 Can you define lost?
00:35:41.660 Because he did lose.
00:35:43.520 I endorse Bill Barr's statement
00:35:45.440 that Trump knows he lost
00:35:48.440 because the election was certified
00:35:51.720 and he was not the president.
00:35:54.240 Therefore, Trump knows
00:35:55.380 he lost.
00:35:58.080 Does Trump know that he can't reverse it?
00:36:01.300 How would you know?
00:36:02.520 Does Trump know that
00:36:03.640 the result was legitimate?
00:36:06.900 Well, that wasn't what
00:36:08.260 Bill Barr said.
00:36:10.080 He said that he do,
00:36:11.800 that Trump knows he lost.
00:36:13.460 But don't we all know that?
00:36:14.840 Doesn't everybody know
00:36:16.540 that the result was certified?
00:36:18.760 That's called losing.
00:36:20.600 Right?
00:36:21.280 The secondary question
00:36:22.800 is whether it was
00:36:23.900 a legitimate result.
00:36:26.500 What does Bill Barr
00:36:27.600 think about that?
00:36:28.480 Well, he didn't say that
00:36:29.320 specifically.
00:36:30.800 But that's a double mind reading
00:36:32.500 for Bill Barr.
00:36:33.440 His credibility
00:36:34.160 is pretty low at the moment.
00:36:36.660 In my mind,
00:36:37.760 his credibility
00:36:38.340 went down with that.
00:36:39.420 To me,
00:36:40.100 that just looks like
00:36:40.920 Bill Barr having
00:36:41.860 some bias.
00:36:43.780 But I'm no mind reader.
00:36:45.320 So, I don't know.
00:36:48.000 Here's the most fun part
00:36:49.500 about the potential
00:36:50.540 for the Trump trial
00:36:52.560 over his 2020
00:36:53.700 election claims.
00:36:56.560 I need a fact check
00:36:57.860 on this,
00:36:58.360 but it's my understanding
00:36:59.360 that Trump's attorneys
00:37:01.440 will put the election
00:37:02.680 itself on trial
00:37:03.760 as part of the defense.
00:37:06.420 Am I right about that?
00:37:07.660 I saw some claims
00:37:10.260 of that,
00:37:11.300 but I wasn't positive
00:37:13.000 that would all be allowed
00:37:14.060 or whatever.
00:37:15.600 So, suppose that happens.
00:37:19.120 What do you think
00:37:19.980 is going to happen
00:37:20.600 if he puts the election
00:37:23.300 on trial?
00:37:24.600 Keep in mind
00:37:25.460 that the courts
00:37:27.000 have made a bunch
00:37:28.200 of rulings
00:37:28.640 on various things,
00:37:29.960 but often their rulings
00:37:31.360 were of the nature
00:37:32.340 that we don't have
00:37:34.400 standing to decide
00:37:35.740 or that it was too late
00:37:37.860 or that they didn't
00:37:39.400 have enough proven votes
00:37:41.180 that it would have
00:37:41.620 changed the election.
00:37:43.000 So, it's never really
00:37:44.240 been, you know,
00:37:45.960 adjudicated as a whole.
00:37:48.140 They've just been able
00:37:49.380 to poke a little
00:37:50.360 pinpricks here and there
00:37:51.480 that have been adjudicated.
00:37:52.580 So, I love saying
00:37:55.040 adjudicated.
00:37:56.440 Did everybody think
00:37:57.380 I was a little bit smarter
00:37:58.380 when I used that word?
00:37:59.860 You're like, whoa.
00:38:01.280 You said adjudicated.
00:38:03.040 Whoa.
00:38:04.480 Big word.
00:38:05.500 It's part of the zeitgeist.
00:38:08.680 I just like to say that too.
00:38:11.080 All right.
00:38:11.340 What about that
00:38:16.860 Trump judge?
00:38:19.120 What about that
00:38:20.000 Trump judge?
00:38:21.020 Well, what do we know
00:38:21.720 about the Trump judge?
00:38:22.900 Obama appointee
00:38:24.100 doesn't necessarily
00:38:26.020 make the judge biased
00:38:28.180 because, you know,
00:38:29.980 they're Trump appointees
00:38:31.060 and you don't assume
00:38:31.800 that they're all criminals
00:38:32.680 or anything.
00:38:34.140 Let's see.
00:38:34.740 What else do we know
00:38:35.340 about that?
00:38:35.840 The judge
00:38:37.000 that's going to work
00:38:39.100 on the Trump case
00:38:40.100 worked where?
00:38:41.960 Oh, at the same law firm
00:38:43.580 as Hunter Biden.
00:38:46.900 Doesn't it feel like
00:38:47.940 that couldn't possibly be true?
00:38:50.100 But I think it is.
00:38:52.080 That the judge
00:38:53.080 actually worked
00:38:53.900 at the same place
00:38:55.440 as Hunter Biden.
00:38:57.160 Now, I don't know
00:38:58.060 if they knew each other.
00:39:00.580 That would be a problem.
00:39:03.240 All right.
00:39:04.980 So, here's my take
00:39:06.840 on how
00:39:07.960 a trial with Trump
00:39:11.200 in which the 2020 election
00:39:13.060 is put on trial
00:39:13.880 could go.
00:39:16.100 How many of you think
00:39:17.340 that you could get
00:39:18.600 12 jurors
00:39:19.760 to agree
00:39:21.740 with the prosecution
00:39:22.840 that they know
00:39:24.560 for sure
00:39:25.100 that the election
00:39:25.960 was fair?
00:39:28.740 Do you think
00:39:29.080 you could get
00:39:29.480 12 jurors in D.C.?
00:39:30.820 Oh, we'll talk about D.C.
00:39:31.900 Hold on.
00:39:32.980 Yeah, we'll talk about
00:39:33.600 the jury pool in D.C.
00:39:36.000 You don't need
00:39:37.100 to prompt me.
00:39:38.220 We're getting there.
00:39:39.080 It's a big topic
00:39:39.940 coming up.
00:39:42.980 But
00:39:43.420 I believe
00:39:45.580 that I could convince
00:39:46.580 all 12 jurors
00:39:47.880 that the election
00:39:49.680 was suspect
00:39:50.420 and I could do it
00:39:51.860 in five minutes.
00:39:53.580 Would you like me
00:39:54.500 to do it to you
00:39:55.300 to show you
00:39:57.120 that if I were
00:39:57.660 talking to the jury
00:39:58.500 I could convince
00:39:59.980 all 12 of them
00:40:00.920 all 12 of them
00:40:02.400 that they don't know
00:40:03.620 if the election
00:40:04.160 was fair?
00:40:04.640 Now, I'm not
00:40:06.060 trying to convince
00:40:06.760 them it was unfair.
00:40:08.180 Right?
00:40:08.400 I don't need to do that.
00:40:10.000 I only need to convince
00:40:11.060 them that any certainty
00:40:13.020 they have about it
00:40:13.940 being fair
00:40:14.460 is unwarranted.
00:40:16.020 Okay?
00:40:16.980 And that should be enough.
00:40:19.220 So,
00:40:20.040 given that the most
00:40:21.220 entertaining
00:40:21.700 and therefore
00:40:22.380 some would say
00:40:23.100 the most likely
00:40:23.760 outcome
00:40:24.240 is that that trial
00:40:26.060 will be put on
00:40:26.820 or that the elections
00:40:27.960 themselves
00:40:28.640 will be put on trial,
00:40:30.660 here's what
00:40:31.300 I would argue
00:40:32.840 if I were
00:40:33.660 Trump's attorney.
00:40:35.260 Some have said
00:40:36.200 that Trump owes me
00:40:37.240 half a million dollars
00:40:38.260 in attorney fees
00:40:39.200 for this excellent summary.
00:40:41.700 But imagine me now
00:40:42.640 talking to the jury
00:40:43.560 and let's say
00:40:44.420 it's my closing statements.
00:40:46.580 And I'm talking
00:40:47.080 to the jury
00:40:47.600 and I'm trying
00:40:48.160 to support Trump
00:40:49.000 and I'm his lawyer
00:40:50.000 and I make
00:40:52.720 the following argument.
00:40:54.980 Fact.
00:40:56.940 Fact.
00:40:58.420 Any system
00:40:59.080 with lots of participants,
00:41:00.980 complexity,
00:41:01.420 and high stakes
00:41:02.880 will become corrupt
00:41:04.700 over time.
00:41:06.780 Any system
00:41:07.600 with those qualities
00:41:08.980 will become corrupt
00:41:09.840 over time.
00:41:10.780 That is true
00:41:11.560 of every observed
00:41:12.600 human-made system
00:41:13.720 since the beginning
00:41:14.620 of recorded history.
00:41:15.860 The only mystery
00:41:17.140 is when
00:41:18.500 the corruption happens.
00:41:21.260 For example,
00:41:22.320 we know that Congress
00:41:23.100 is influenced
00:41:24.080 by the military-industrial complex.
00:41:27.120 Nobody really questions
00:41:28.200 that anymore.
00:41:29.160 We know that
00:41:29.880 financial markets
00:41:30.660 are increasingly rigged
00:41:32.000 for the benefit
00:41:33.120 of the big players.
00:41:35.080 I don't think
00:41:35.640 anybody questions that.
00:41:38.700 And
00:41:39.060 every complex system
00:41:43.260 that's human-made
00:41:45.060 of high value
00:41:46.300 becomes corrupt
00:41:46.940 over time
00:41:47.480 no matter what
00:41:48.620 kind of controls
00:41:49.400 are in place.
00:41:51.200 So if you think,
00:41:52.040 well,
00:41:52.340 we've got all the controls
00:41:53.440 to stop it,
00:41:54.740 nobody's ever done that.
00:41:56.680 Nobody's ever been able
00:41:57.640 to put enough controls
00:41:58.580 in place
00:41:59.100 in a complex situation
00:42:00.900 where there's high value
00:42:01.940 and lots of participants,
00:42:03.400 et cetera.
00:42:05.120 There's never been
00:42:06.080 an exception.
00:42:07.480 That's because,
00:42:08.560 here's why there's never
00:42:09.420 been an exception to it,
00:42:10.720 because bad actors
00:42:11.980 have an incentive
00:42:12.800 to peck away
00:42:14.200 until they find a hole
00:42:15.460 to crawl through.
00:42:17.320 So if you have a system
00:42:18.300 that has survived
00:42:19.900 all attempts
00:42:20.560 to corrupt it,
00:42:22.000 the attempts
00:42:22.500 aren't going to stop
00:42:23.400 because it's a high-value system,
00:42:25.420 it's complex,
00:42:26.600 people have an incentive,
00:42:27.640 to try to corrupt it.
00:42:29.380 So people are going
00:42:30.260 to pick at it forever
00:42:31.400 until somebody gets lucky
00:42:32.980 and finds a way
00:42:34.440 in through some crack.
00:42:36.360 So you know for sure
00:42:37.700 that it will be corrupted,
00:42:39.440 you just don't know when.
00:42:41.080 You can guarantee it
00:42:42.100 by design.
00:42:43.060 Remember,
00:42:44.000 design is destiny.
00:42:45.720 It's designed
00:42:46.500 to be corrupted.
00:42:48.140 If we designed it
00:42:49.660 to not be corrupted,
00:42:50.700 it would look different.
00:42:52.180 You know,
00:42:52.360 it would be
00:42:52.780 paint on your finger,
00:42:54.580 one written ballot,
00:42:55.940 you know,
00:42:56.340 it would be easy
00:42:56.800 to design a system.
00:42:58.280 They had no questions.
00:43:00.160 But we didn't.
00:43:01.220 We designed a system
00:43:02.200 that's guaranteed
00:43:02.900 to have corruption.
00:43:05.060 We just don't know when.
00:43:07.160 All right.
00:43:10.000 Our elections
00:43:10.760 are not fully auditable.
00:43:12.500 We don't see
00:43:13.060 the computer code
00:43:14.060 for the machines.
00:43:15.140 We don't know
00:43:15.820 if mail-in ballots
00:43:16.760 were discarded
00:43:17.640 before reaching
00:43:18.420 the drop box.
00:43:19.760 We don't know
00:43:20.340 if any bad actors
00:43:21.340 hacked any part of it.
00:43:22.360 And we certainly
00:43:23.300 don't know
00:43:23.940 if there are
00:43:25.100 innovative ways
00:43:25.920 to rig an election
00:43:26.780 that have not yet
00:43:28.420 been discovered.
00:43:31.220 Do you think
00:43:32.300 we've thought
00:43:33.120 of all the ways
00:43:33.720 it could be done?
00:43:35.520 Probably not.
00:43:37.320 Criminals are pretty clever
00:43:38.420 because remember,
00:43:39.460 they can just
00:43:40.140 keep pecking at it
00:43:41.220 until somebody
00:43:42.040 gets lucky
00:43:42.580 and finds a way in.
00:43:44.980 All right.
00:43:46.560 So we can't know
00:43:47.520 for sure
00:43:47.860 if any particular election,
00:43:49.360 such as 2020,
00:43:50.420 was rigged,
00:43:51.020 but we can know
00:43:51.920 for sure
00:43:52.220 the current design
00:43:52.980 of our election system
00:43:53.860 guarantees rigging
00:43:55.000 at some point.
00:43:56.400 And we can know
00:43:57.020 for sure
00:43:57.360 that the voting results
00:43:58.440 for 2020
00:43:59.580 violated historical patterns
00:44:02.800 so drastically
00:44:04.560 that any reasonable person
00:44:06.860 would have some questions.
00:44:09.160 Now,
00:44:09.720 there are explanations
00:44:10.840 for why the patterns
00:44:11.840 were what they were,
00:44:13.100 something about the changes
00:44:14.700 in the laws of voting
00:44:16.400 and the pandemic,
00:44:17.480 et cetera,
00:44:17.980 but certainly the jury
00:44:19.720 would have some questions
00:44:20.560 because by then
00:44:22.560 they would have shown
00:44:23.500 that there were patterns
00:44:24.600 being violated.
00:44:25.680 The jury would know that
00:44:26.820 by the time they got
00:44:27.480 to the closing arguments.
00:44:28.820 All right.
00:44:29.420 Now,
00:44:29.760 a reasonable person
00:44:30.580 can believe the 2020 election
00:44:31.960 was fair.
00:44:33.280 Now,
00:44:33.680 this is called pacing.
00:44:35.340 So you allow
00:44:36.460 that their point of view
00:44:37.480 if it's different for yours
00:44:38.780 could still be reasonable.
00:44:40.820 Say,
00:44:41.180 a reasonable person
00:44:41.980 can believe the 2020 election
00:44:43.340 was fair,
00:44:44.280 but ask yourself,
00:44:45.860 how much of your opinion
00:44:47.080 is influenced
00:44:47.820 by your patriotism
00:44:49.120 and wishful thinking
00:44:50.840 about how things should be.
00:44:53.420 Trusting an American election
00:44:54.820 requires trust
00:44:56.760 in the party
00:44:57.380 that brought you
00:44:58.020 the Russia collusion hoax,
00:44:59.880 the Hunter laptop hoax,
00:45:01.580 and about 20 others.
00:45:04.100 They could be listening
00:45:05.080 if you wanted to.
00:45:06.360 With that cast of characters
00:45:08.340 who did all those hoaxes,
00:45:10.740 do you think they would hesitate
00:45:11.760 to rig an election
00:45:12.660 if they could get away with it?
00:45:13.960 If they could get away with it.
00:45:16.580 That cast of characters.
00:45:18.780 And,
00:45:19.420 remember,
00:45:20.780 no one was arrested
00:45:22.080 for any of the hoaxes
00:45:25.060 I just mentioned.
00:45:26.080 There are no,
00:45:27.300 well,
00:45:27.600 actually,
00:45:27.900 I guess one guy
00:45:28.480 got arrested
00:45:30.120 and,
00:45:31.720 you know,
00:45:32.100 he's still practicing law.
00:45:33.640 So basically,
00:45:34.560 you get away with it
00:45:35.400 if you do hoaxes
00:45:37.120 of these nature,
00:45:39.060 of that nature.
00:45:40.600 All right.
00:45:41.120 So here's my closer.
00:45:42.380 President Trump
00:45:42.960 has lived in the real world
00:45:44.400 of business and politics
00:45:45.580 for longer than most of you
00:45:47.560 have been alive.
00:45:49.320 He knows how the real world works.
00:45:51.880 He has seen it from the inside.
00:45:53.680 His instincts told him
00:45:55.000 the election was gamed
00:45:56.280 in some way.
00:45:58.140 How much of your own money
00:45:59.560 would you bet
00:46:00.620 that Mr. Trump's instincts
00:46:02.320 about the election
00:46:03.240 are wrong?
00:46:05.540 Your own money.
00:46:06.560 How much would you bet
00:46:07.440 that he's wrong?
00:46:09.180 He's got decades of experience
00:46:11.080 of looking at sketchy situations.
00:46:14.540 Would you bet against him?
00:46:16.660 Again,
00:46:17.060 knowing that the system
00:46:17.960 he's blaming
00:46:18.760 is designed
00:46:20.320 to be corrupt
00:46:21.440 eventually.
00:46:22.500 We just don't know
00:46:23.180 if he's right about it now.
00:46:24.840 But would you bet against him?
00:46:27.880 And
00:46:28.320 in order to find
00:46:31.220 Mr. Trump guilty,
00:46:32.560 you have to
00:46:33.040 you have to bet
00:46:33.960 against his experience
00:46:35.360 in spotting
00:46:36.020 sketchy behavior.
00:46:36.860 And you have to believe
00:46:38.380 all 50 states
00:46:39.520 ran clean elections
00:46:40.760 in the context
00:46:42.640 of no other complex
00:46:45.140 human-made system
00:46:46.800 of high value
00:46:47.700 ever being entirely clean.
00:46:51.840 That's what you have to believe.
00:46:55.440 Now,
00:46:57.320 you know,
00:46:58.360 if I did the short version,
00:46:59.700 I'd deliver it in five minutes.
00:47:01.640 How many believe
00:47:02.500 that in five minutes
00:47:03.460 I could guarantee
00:47:04.300 you don't get 12 jurors
00:47:05.760 to believe
00:47:06.740 that the election
00:47:07.320 was fair?
00:47:08.560 For sure.
00:47:16.600 Here's the mind reader.
00:47:18.400 Kiss the sky says,
00:47:19.920 Scott isn't as smart
00:47:21.020 as he thinks.
00:47:22.920 What exactly do I think?
00:47:24.800 In my inner thoughts,
00:47:26.800 please tell me
00:47:27.480 what I'm thinking
00:47:28.140 about my own intelligence.
00:47:30.440 Because that was a real
00:47:31.280 insightful comment there.
00:47:33.700 Goodbye.
00:47:35.760 All right.
00:47:38.420 So now you're saying to me,
00:47:40.240 but Scott,
00:47:41.780 you're forgetting
00:47:42.540 it's a D.C.
00:47:43.820 it's a D.C. jury, right?
00:47:46.220 Let's talk about that.
00:47:48.400 Well,
00:47:49.240 is the D.C. jury pool biased?
00:47:53.200 Well,
00:47:53.640 you don't have to worry about it
00:47:54.860 because a senior legal affairs
00:47:56.340 reporter for Politico
00:47:57.500 who has a focus
00:47:59.620 on the January 6th aftermath.
00:48:01.880 So it's somebody
00:48:03.360 who writes for Politico
00:48:04.460 and is really focused
00:48:06.920 on the January 6th,
00:48:08.580 I believe he'd call it
00:48:09.720 an insurrection.
00:48:11.060 So you've got a real
00:48:11.740 unbiased source here.
00:48:13.360 And it's Kyle Cheney.
00:48:15.000 And here's Kyle explaining
00:48:16.940 that you shouldn't worry
00:48:17.760 about the D.C. juries.
00:48:19.860 Now,
00:48:20.260 before your heads explode,
00:48:22.740 I'm going to debunk him
00:48:24.540 when we're done.
00:48:25.080 So don't worry
00:48:27.320 that I believe
00:48:28.060 what his argument is,
00:48:29.700 all right? 0.95
00:48:30.200 Because you're going to go nuts
00:48:31.260 if you think I believe him.
00:48:32.840 Okay?
00:48:33.540 I'll just tell you
00:48:34.580 what he said.
00:48:36.320 He said,
00:48:37.120 the trope about D.C. juries,
00:48:38.960 in quotes,
00:48:39.500 the D.C. juries,
00:48:40.660 has not really played out
00:48:42.120 in practice.
00:48:43.380 In the two most high-profile
00:48:45.220 January 6th cases so far,
00:48:47.360 juries have acquitted
00:48:48.300 on some of the most serious charges
00:48:50.140 and delivered nuanced verdicts.
00:48:53.000 Jurors are selected
00:48:55.120 after extensive questioning
00:48:56.720 by lawyers and judges
00:48:58.060 that include extensive review
00:49:00.220 of political leanings
00:49:01.380 and direct impacts
00:49:02.840 of January 6th.
00:49:04.540 Only after that process,
00:49:07.540 if judges and lawyers
00:49:08.880 think they are unable
00:49:10.520 to seat an impartial jury,
00:49:12.660 is motion to change venue
00:49:14.340 in order.
00:49:16.160 Jury systems in the U.S. 0.85
00:49:17.440 are premised on juries
00:49:19.000 being willing to set aside
00:49:20.500 personal views
00:49:21.580 and judge based on evidence.
00:49:24.540 If you don't believe
00:49:25.760 that is possible
00:49:26.800 and that most people
00:49:28.520 won't jail an innocent person
00:49:30.280 just because they have
00:49:31.220 different views,
00:49:32.340 that's a critique
00:49:33.460 of the entire system, people.
00:49:35.900 That would be a critique
00:49:36.940 of the entire system.
00:49:38.660 Because you know
00:49:39.520 people take it seriously.
00:49:41.600 All right?
00:49:42.520 So that's his point.
00:49:44.160 Pretty good argument, right?
00:49:45.200 It's a strong argument.
00:49:48.500 He's saying that history shows
00:49:50.020 that they're not just all voting
00:49:52.700 in one direction.
00:49:54.140 He says the process guarantees
00:49:55.860 you can talk to them individually
00:49:57.440 and find out what their bias is.
00:49:59.760 So that should be fine.
00:50:01.260 Everybody good with that?
00:50:02.940 D.C. juries?
00:50:04.140 No problem.
00:50:05.800 Right?
00:50:07.120 Well, I tweeted back
00:50:08.340 at Kyle Cheney
00:50:11.500 after reading his tweet
00:50:12.740 and I said this.
00:50:14.960 Now imagine
00:50:15.540 every potential juror
00:50:17.020 has been brainwashed
00:50:18.120 to believe the defendant
00:50:19.260 is literally Hitler-like.
00:50:23.620 Now put me
00:50:24.600 in the jury pool.
00:50:26.260 I will lie 1.00
00:50:27.020 to your dumb ass 1.00
00:50:28.160 all day long 1.00
00:50:28.920 to get on that jury
00:50:29.800 and take Hitler 0.95
00:50:30.460 off the field.
00:50:31.760 I hope you would too, Kyle.
00:50:34.060 None of the normal rules
00:50:35.400 apply to Trump.
00:50:38.160 Hello.
00:50:39.380 Wouldn't you like me
00:50:40.040 to be your lawyer?
00:50:43.060 Nothing that Kyle said
00:50:45.560 about D.C. jury pools,
00:50:47.820 which, by the way,
00:50:49.160 I do believe
00:50:49.960 Kyle's argument.
00:50:52.080 I do believe
00:50:52.980 that for the ordinary crime,
00:50:55.600 you know,
00:50:55.800 somebody stole something,
00:50:57.140 or even January 6th,
00:50:58.540 if you're talking
00:50:59.040 about the protesters.
00:51:00.320 I believe that even
00:51:01.720 a Democrat
00:51:03.660 on the jury
00:51:05.720 would look at
00:51:06.820 a Republican protester
00:51:08.160 and say some version of,
00:51:10.260 well, that's just
00:51:10.740 a citizen, right?
00:51:13.520 That could have been me
00:51:14.680 and might have been me
00:51:16.580 if the results
00:51:17.220 had been the other way.
00:51:18.480 So it's easy
00:51:19.520 for me to believe
00:51:20.220 that a Democrat citizen
00:51:22.040 would find
00:51:23.300 a Republican citizen
00:51:24.660 not guilty,
00:51:26.360 even when there's
00:51:27.400 a political ramification.
00:51:29.020 I can see that.
00:51:29.800 I do think that the jury,
00:51:31.120 I do think our legal system
00:51:32.600 is at least that good.
00:51:33.980 But that doesn't
00:51:36.580 apply to Trump.
00:51:38.620 After, what,
00:51:39.900 six years of the media
00:51:41.440 telling you that
00:51:42.540 he's literally the devil
00:51:44.460 and he's, you know, 0.97
00:51:45.680 Hitler incarnate, 0.95
00:51:47.860 what juror
00:51:48.980 is going to ignore that?
00:51:51.660 Right?
00:51:52.020 So there's nothing normal
00:51:53.520 about Trump in a jury.
00:51:56.220 So I would argue
00:51:58.000 that Kyle is right
00:51:59.380 for just about
00:52:00.720 every defendant
00:52:01.540 except Trump,
00:52:02.500 and in this case
00:52:03.680 he would be as wrong
00:52:04.460 as you could possibly be
00:52:05.660 because Hitler 0.90
00:52:06.800 does not get a fair trial
00:52:08.380 anywhere.
00:52:11.260 And you would argue
00:52:12.480 that that's right.
00:52:14.360 I mean, I just said
00:52:15.180 I would lie
00:52:16.240 to get on the jury pool
00:52:17.300 or I would lie
00:52:18.340 to get on the jury.
00:52:19.760 And I would.
00:52:20.840 I promise you,
00:52:21.940 I take an oath
00:52:22.700 that if Hitler 0.91
00:52:24.240 or a Hitler-like character
00:52:26.200 is ever,
00:52:26.700 is ever,
00:52:28.000 you know,
00:52:28.800 on the stand,
00:52:30.240 I will lie
00:52:31.600 to get on the jury
00:52:32.400 if I have to
00:52:33.060 just to get rid of them.
00:52:35.280 I wouldn't care
00:52:35.980 what the legal system
00:52:36.840 told me I had to do
00:52:37.800 at all.
00:52:39.360 It wouldn't even be a factor.
00:52:41.260 I would just say
00:52:42.040 what is right,
00:52:42.780 what is wrong,
00:52:43.860 what could kill me,
00:52:44.820 what could keep me alive,
00:52:46.460 what could kill my family,
00:52:47.680 what could keep them alive,
00:52:48.760 and then I would act on that.
00:52:50.440 But I definitely
00:52:51.200 wouldn't be acting on the law.
00:52:53.420 I promise you,
00:52:54.520 I would ignore the law completely.
00:52:56.820 And if somebody asked me
00:52:57.840 how I did it,
00:52:58.420 I'd say,
00:52:58.720 oh, I looked at the facts.
00:53:00.480 Oh yeah,
00:53:01.040 after the fact,
00:53:01.740 I'd say,
00:53:01.940 oh, I looked at all those facts.
00:53:03.780 I'm sure all those facts
00:53:04.940 were totally convincing me.
00:53:07.520 That's what I'd say. 1.00
00:53:08.620 I would lie through my ass. 1.00
00:53:11.460 Every one of you would. 1.00
00:53:13.040 I hope.
00:53:14.180 If you're good people,
00:53:15.120 you would lie too
00:53:15.820 in that situation.
00:53:18.280 That's my feeling.
00:53:20.760 All right,
00:53:21.280 well,
00:53:21.780 here's the funniest thing
00:53:22.800 I read about it,
00:53:23.480 and this is from
00:53:24.280 Twitter user
00:53:25.880 Deplorable Greenie,
00:53:28.260 Rob Macho.
00:53:29.700 And he suggested
00:53:31.100 a strategy
00:53:31.800 for Trump's attorneys.
00:53:34.200 He says the defense
00:53:35.340 could call
00:53:36.020 81 million witnesses
00:53:37.620 to the stand
00:53:38.420 and watch about
00:53:39.880 65 million show up.
00:53:43.100 Okay,
00:53:43.860 that's pretty funny.
00:53:46.880 That is really funny.
00:53:49.060 Invite 81 million
00:53:50.220 and watch
00:53:51.100 when only 65 million
00:53:52.420 show up.
00:53:54.920 That's a good joke.
00:53:57.220 Good joke.
00:53:58.140 All right.
00:54:01.360 Matt Gaetz
00:54:02.100 has a plan
00:54:02.760 that looks pretty
00:54:03.480 interesting
00:54:03.900 to make sure
00:54:06.480 that we're
00:54:06.940 doing the right thing
00:54:08.020 with this
00:54:08.380 Jack Smith
00:54:08.980 prosecutor
00:54:09.620 and Trump.
00:54:10.520 He's got a four-point plan.
00:54:11.920 He says demand
00:54:12.540 that Jack Smith,
00:54:13.640 the prosecutor,
00:54:14.580 present himself
00:54:15.280 before the House
00:54:16.040 Judiciary Committee
00:54:17.000 for a transcribed
00:54:18.540 interview in the next
00:54:19.420 15 days.
00:54:20.200 In other words,
00:54:20.800 get him under
00:54:21.420 the oath
00:54:21.780 and make him
00:54:22.980 talk about this
00:54:23.780 thing,
00:54:24.540 transparency.
00:54:25.180 If he does not,
00:54:26.680 point two,
00:54:27.600 we should send 0.99
00:54:28.180 a subpoena.
00:54:28.860 If he ignores
00:54:29.440 a subpoena,
00:54:30.720 you know,
00:54:31.040 blah, blah,
00:54:31.640 do what you do
00:54:32.400 when people
00:54:33.180 ignore subpoenas.
00:54:34.320 And then number
00:54:34.800 four,
00:54:36.260 Merrick Garland,
00:54:37.320 Attorney General,
00:54:38.600 if he doesn't
00:54:39.620 enforce the
00:54:40.580 criminal contempt
00:54:41.480 charges,
00:54:42.460 in other words,
00:54:42.980 if Jack Smith
00:54:43.620 doesn't show up
00:54:44.720 and answer the
00:54:45.300 questions,
00:54:46.300 then we ought
00:54:47.140 to impeach him.
00:54:48.820 Well,
00:54:49.700 I don't know.
00:54:50.480 This feels a little
00:54:51.300 bit toothless.
00:54:53.640 Do you think,
00:54:55.260 because I don't
00:54:55.740 know what would
00:54:56.200 be the point
00:54:56.980 of asking him
00:54:58.100 to talk in public.
00:54:59.400 It would just
00:55:00.020 be political,
00:55:00.700 right?
00:55:01.700 The point of it
00:55:02.540 would be to
00:55:03.100 embarrass him
00:55:03.940 by making it
00:55:04.580 look like it's
00:55:05.100 a political
00:55:05.600 prosecution,
00:55:07.540 something like
00:55:08.020 that.
00:55:09.300 I don't know.
00:55:09.860 I feel like he
00:55:10.540 could just show up
00:55:11.240 and do a
00:55:11.600 Christopher Wray.
00:55:13.060 Couldn't he?
00:55:16.660 You know,
00:55:17.380 Jack Smith,
00:55:18.260 can you tell us
00:55:19.180 why you did
00:55:20.240 X?
00:55:22.020 Yeah,
00:55:22.500 I can't talk
00:55:23.240 about that
00:55:23.700 because the
00:55:24.200 investigation is
00:55:24.980 ongoing.
00:55:26.300 All right,
00:55:26.800 well,
00:55:27.220 well,
00:55:28.060 can you tell us
00:55:28.860 about why?
00:55:31.540 I can look into
00:55:32.480 that.
00:55:32.980 I don't have the
00:55:33.640 notes with me,
00:55:34.280 but I'd be happy
00:55:35.040 to look into that
00:55:35.720 and get back to
00:55:36.200 you.
00:55:37.540 All right,
00:55:38.100 well,
00:55:38.480 how about Z?
00:55:40.060 Can you tell us
00:55:40.560 about Z?
00:55:43.340 I don't have that
00:55:44.380 information.
00:55:45.040 It's an ongoing
00:55:45.620 process.
00:55:46.480 I can get that
00:55:47.320 information,
00:55:47.980 but not now
00:55:48.640 because there's a
00:55:49.580 current investigation
00:55:50.960 underway.
00:55:53.200 I don't know.
00:55:53.780 I feel like that
00:55:55.700 would be a dead
00:55:56.240 end,
00:55:58.360 but I'm also
00:55:59.240 going to give
00:56:01.340 Matt Gates
00:56:02.320 credit
00:56:02.760 because he did
00:56:04.060 something.
00:56:05.600 Right?
00:56:05.820 He did
00:56:06.180 something.
00:56:07.380 So that's,
00:56:08.660 you know,
00:56:08.900 I'm going to give
00:56:09.400 him the A for
00:56:10.400 doing something.
00:56:11.960 Maybe you get
00:56:12.420 lucky.
00:56:13.420 You know,
00:56:13.620 maybe Jack Smith
00:56:14.480 says something we
00:56:15.300 didn't know.
00:56:16.360 Maybe.
00:56:16.700 I mean,
00:56:18.140 it's pretty much
00:56:18.760 a long shot.
00:56:19.720 Probably a waste
00:56:20.220 of time.
00:56:21.240 But at least
00:56:21.620 it's something.
00:56:23.020 That's not
00:56:23.580 nothing.
00:56:24.740 All right,
00:56:25.260 here's an
00:56:25.560 interesting thing.
00:56:26.300 DeSantis is
00:56:26.980 doing so poorly
00:56:27.760 campaigning that
00:56:28.560 he agreed to
00:56:29.200 debate Newsom.
00:56:30.820 What do you
00:56:31.340 think of that?
00:56:32.320 He agreed to
00:56:33.260 debate Newsom.
00:56:34.840 Now,
00:56:35.120 that's a Hail Mary.
00:56:37.200 That is a Hail Mary.
00:56:40.560 But he might be
00:56:41.620 smart.
00:56:42.940 This could turn
00:56:43.960 out to be a
00:56:45.120 good play.
00:56:45.700 Here's my
00:56:46.060 thinking.
00:56:47.360 As things
00:56:48.100 stand,
00:56:49.980 it doesn't
00:56:51.080 look like
00:56:51.480 DeSantis will
00:56:52.200 be the
00:56:52.800 candidate.
00:56:53.940 As things
00:56:54.520 stand.
00:56:55.220 Even if
00:56:55.720 Trump is
00:56:56.260 in jail.
00:56:57.580 I've got a
00:56:58.260 feeling he's
00:56:58.700 still going to
00:56:59.040 be the
00:56:59.260 candidate.
00:57:00.380 So,
00:57:01.380 DeSantis has
00:57:02.060 to do
00:57:02.480 something.
00:57:03.780 Right?
00:57:03.900 He's going to
00:57:04.240 have to get
00:57:05.660 out of his
00:57:06.040 little box of
00:57:06.840 talking like a
00:57:07.760 corporate guy
00:57:08.420 and just do
00:57:09.140 something.
00:57:10.380 Yeah,
00:57:10.660 and Vivek is
00:57:11.320 making him
00:57:12.060 look like a
00:57:12.660 non-corpore.
00:57:13.960 competitor at
00:57:14.600 this point.
00:57:15.880 So,
00:57:16.620 I guess Newsom
00:57:17.620 had said he
00:57:18.440 would do it
00:57:18.980 and DeSantis
00:57:19.520 now says he
00:57:20.380 agrees.
00:57:21.000 Who knows if
00:57:21.500 it will really
00:57:21.860 happen.
00:57:22.400 I suspect it
00:57:23.060 will because
00:57:23.500 it would be
00:57:23.820 so entertaining.
00:57:25.040 Somebody would
00:57:25.580 want to host
00:57:26.220 it.
00:57:27.160 And,
00:57:28.400 how do you
00:57:31.340 think he
00:57:31.640 would do?
00:57:33.220 So,
00:57:33.740 here's my
00:57:34.100 take.
00:57:34.500 If this were
00:57:35.040 a general
00:57:35.520 election,
00:57:37.000 I would be
00:57:37.640 worried for
00:57:38.380 DeSantis
00:57:38.900 against Newsom
00:57:40.000 because Newsom's
00:57:41.120 not bad
00:57:41.860 on stage.
00:57:43.960 Would you
00:57:44.760 agree?
00:57:46.020 You know,
00:57:47.040 he's a
00:57:47.360 governor for
00:57:47.840 a reason.
00:57:49.400 He's a
00:57:50.060 governor because
00:57:50.640 he's good at
00:57:51.300 this,
00:57:52.280 this exact
00:57:53.320 thing he's
00:57:53.900 good at.
00:57:55.160 So,
00:57:56.740 DeSantis is
00:57:57.440 probably good
00:57:58.140 too,
00:57:59.200 and I think
00:57:59.940 that DeSantis
00:58:00.600 is correctly
00:58:01.680 playing this
00:58:03.180 because if
00:58:04.700 any Democrat
00:58:06.360 has a debate
00:58:07.880 with any
00:58:08.580 Republican,
00:58:09.080 what do the
00:58:09.820 Republicans say
00:58:10.560 when it's
00:58:10.900 over?
00:58:11.140 you know.
00:58:14.700 Any
00:58:14.980 Republican
00:58:15.540 debates any
00:58:17.000 Democrat and
00:58:17.920 then when it's
00:58:18.360 over,
00:58:18.740 what do the
00:58:19.180 Republicans say?
00:58:20.640 The Republicans
00:58:21.220 say that
00:58:21.720 Republican,
00:58:22.440 whoever he
00:58:22.820 was,
00:58:23.640 won that so
00:58:24.840 easily.
00:58:26.640 That's my
00:58:27.220 guy,
00:58:28.060 right?
00:58:29.160 So,
00:58:30.720 if DeSantis,
00:58:33.020 this is actually
00:58:33.660 a clever play
00:58:34.480 because you can
00:58:35.840 count on your
00:58:36.760 base saying
00:58:37.620 you won even
00:58:38.400 if you lost,
00:58:40.280 right?
00:58:40.940 And you can
00:58:41.620 count on them
00:58:42.220 ignoring CNN
00:58:43.100 if CNN says
00:58:44.300 that Newsom
00:58:44.980 won.
00:58:46.180 And MSNBC,
00:58:47.280 of course they
00:58:47.800 would,
00:58:48.420 they would say
00:58:48.860 Newsom won.
00:58:50.040 But his base
00:58:50.980 wouldn't care
00:58:52.160 about any of
00:58:52.620 that.
00:58:53.080 They would
00:58:53.440 just say,
00:58:54.060 oh,
00:58:54.420 he said
00:58:54.840 things I
00:58:55.300 agree with,
00:58:56.220 therefore he
00:58:56.720 won.
00:58:57.680 So,
00:58:58.240 in the context
00:58:58.780 of the
00:58:59.080 primaries,
00:59:00.220 it's probably
00:59:00.840 really smart.
00:59:02.780 I'm going to
00:59:03.280 have to give
00:59:03.700 him,
00:59:04.200 I'm going to
00:59:05.960 have to give
00:59:06.280 him an A for
00:59:06.840 this.
00:59:08.020 I'm going to
00:59:08.300 have to give
00:59:08.700 DeSantis his
00:59:09.440 first A for
00:59:10.780 campaigning.
00:59:11.900 I think he's
00:59:12.300 very solid as
00:59:13.060 a governor.
00:59:14.040 But for
00:59:14.420 campaigning,
00:59:15.100 he's faltered
00:59:15.780 a little bit,
00:59:16.320 he just hasn't
00:59:16.800 been interesting.
00:59:17.700 But this is
00:59:18.280 both interesting,
00:59:19.780 it's very
00:59:20.200 interesting,
00:59:21.100 and it's the
00:59:21.960 right play
00:59:22.400 because he
00:59:22.780 can't lose.
00:59:24.380 He's got a
00:59:25.140 no-lose
00:59:25.640 proposition.
00:59:27.320 It's kind of
00:59:27.860 Trump-like.
00:59:28.940 You know,
00:59:29.120 you can win
00:59:29.560 two A's.
00:59:30.720 So he wins
00:59:31.420 if Newsom
00:59:31.980 doesn't show
00:59:32.620 up.
00:59:33.760 He wins
00:59:34.620 if Newsom
00:59:35.140 wins.
00:59:36.080 If Newsom
00:59:36.600 shows up
00:59:37.080 and wins
00:59:37.480 the debate,
00:59:39.120 DeSantis'
00:59:39.780 base will
00:59:40.160 never even
00:59:40.560 know that.
00:59:41.500 They'll just
00:59:41.940 say,
00:59:42.240 I watched
00:59:42.720 it too,
00:59:43.100 and I
00:59:43.300 saw him
00:59:43.580 win.
00:59:44.400 Or they'll
00:59:44.960 see the
00:59:45.280 news reports
00:59:45.860 and say,
00:59:46.220 well,
00:59:46.400 the news
00:59:46.700 says DeSantis
00:59:48.700 won.
00:59:48.960 So it's
00:59:51.160 all upside.
00:59:54.320 DeSantis
00:59:54.760 could get up
00:59:55.380 there and
00:59:55.740 drool on
00:59:56.400 stage.
00:59:58.420 Newsom
00:59:58.860 could cream
00:59:59.500 him,
01:00:00.420 and the
01:00:01.080 base would
01:00:01.500 still say
01:00:01.940 DeSantis won
01:00:02.680 easily.
01:00:03.660 So there
01:00:04.240 really isn't a
01:00:05.040 debate risk.
01:00:06.040 I think there
01:00:06.600 would be a
01:00:07.080 debate risk if
01:00:07.740 this were the
01:00:08.220 general election.
01:00:09.640 But since he's
01:00:10.220 just talking to
01:00:10.760 the base,
01:00:12.040 there's no way
01:00:12.680 to lose.
01:00:14.260 And I say
01:00:14.980 no way.
01:00:15.500 I mean,
01:00:16.520 he could say 1.00
01:00:17.020 the dumbest 1.00
01:00:17.500 thing in the 1.00
01:00:17.860 world and
01:00:18.340 lose,
01:00:19.040 but he's a
01:00:20.560 capable,
01:00:21.980 strong player.
01:00:22.740 You'd expect
01:00:23.220 him to do
01:00:23.660 fine.
01:00:26.020 So that's
01:00:27.940 fun.
01:00:29.500 In other
01:00:30.260 news,
01:00:31.200 the so-called
01:00:32.240 George Floyd
01:00:33.060 narrative is
01:00:33.740 taking a hit,
01:00:34.640 the narrative
01:00:35.200 being that the 0.75
01:00:36.120 black citizens 0.87
01:00:37.120 in Minnesota 0.97
01:00:37.860 were being
01:00:38.420 treated differently
01:00:39.980 or worse than
01:00:40.760 the white 0.66
01:00:41.280 citizens by
01:00:42.120 the police.
01:00:43.440 But an
01:00:44.000 analysis found
01:00:44.960 the opposite,
01:00:46.080 that police
01:00:47.540 were harder
01:00:48.180 on, and
01:00:48.920 the justice
01:00:49.460 system in
01:00:50.000 general, all
01:00:50.600 the way through
01:00:51.120 from sentencing
01:00:51.920 to incarceration,
01:00:53.460 was harder
01:00:54.060 on white
01:00:54.520 offenders.
01:00:58.220 So everything
01:00:59.260 was opposite.
01:01:01.060 All those
01:01:01.820 riots, all
01:01:03.980 the George
01:01:04.700 Floyd problems,
01:01:05.760 all based on
01:01:06.520 the fact that 0.99
01:01:07.080 black people 0.97
01:01:07.620 were getting 0.99
01:01:08.140 worse treatment
01:01:09.680 by the justice
01:01:10.360 system.
01:01:11.520 It was the
01:01:12.280 opposite.
01:01:12.560 Now, I'm
01:01:15.080 not sure I
01:01:15.540 believe the
01:01:15.940 analysis, so
01:01:17.320 let me say, I
01:01:19.340 don't believe
01:01:19.720 any data about
01:01:20.500 anything, because
01:01:21.920 we live in a
01:01:22.460 world where all
01:01:23.080 data is
01:01:23.500 motivated.
01:01:24.680 There's always
01:01:25.080 somebody who
01:01:25.540 wants it to
01:01:25.960 come out a
01:01:26.480 certain way, and
01:01:27.220 I was surprised
01:01:27.940 it did.
01:01:28.920 So I'm not
01:01:29.700 sure I believe
01:01:30.220 this analysis.
01:01:31.340 What do you
01:01:31.660 think?
01:01:32.840 But what I do
01:01:33.700 believe is we
01:01:34.720 also don't know
01:01:35.520 if it works the
01:01:36.160 other way.
01:01:37.520 I do believe
01:01:38.280 that if you
01:01:38.740 showed me data
01:01:39.360 that was
01:01:39.680 literally the
01:01:40.320 opposite, I
01:01:40.980 would say the
01:01:41.420 same thing.
01:01:41.940 I go, well, I
01:01:43.400 don't believe any
01:01:43.960 data.
01:01:46.800 But maybe, I
01:01:49.100 don't know what
01:01:49.700 would be the
01:01:50.260 operating mechanism
01:01:51.360 that would make
01:01:52.620 things worse for
01:01:53.520 white citizens in
01:01:54.620 Minnesota.
01:01:56.340 What exactly
01:01:57.060 would cause that?
01:01:58.660 I mean, it's not
01:01:59.560 discrimination in
01:02:00.960 the classic sense.
01:02:03.100 Would it be
01:02:03.500 active?
01:02:04.700 It wouldn't
01:02:05.200 even be reverse
01:02:06.560 discrimination.
01:02:08.300 I don't know.
01:02:08.760 I guess I
01:02:10.480 would doubt
01:02:11.540 the data more
01:02:13.100 than I would
01:02:13.640 doubt my
01:02:14.240 understanding of
01:02:14.980 why it would
01:02:15.500 happen, because
01:02:16.480 I think maybe it
01:02:17.320 didn't happen.
01:02:18.300 I suspect it's
01:02:19.040 closer to even
01:02:19.820 treatment.
01:02:23.480 All right.
01:02:24.820 So, who's
01:02:25.920 going to go to
01:02:26.400 jail first,
01:02:27.320 Trump or
01:02:28.880 Biden?
01:02:30.000 Here's my take.
01:02:31.400 I say neither
01:02:32.140 of them, because
01:02:33.620 I don't think we
01:02:34.240 live in a world
01:02:34.920 where the main
01:02:36.700 candidates for
01:02:37.460 president in all
01:02:38.360 likelihood are
01:02:39.200 going to be
01:02:39.580 jailed.
01:02:40.460 This is the
01:02:41.220 very definition
01:02:41.940 of too far.
01:02:44.720 If, can you
01:02:45.840 imagine Biden
01:02:46.580 winning an
01:02:47.180 election because
01:02:47.900 he jailed his
01:02:48.720 opponent?
01:02:50.100 Just imagine
01:02:50.700 that.
01:02:51.420 Or even winning
01:02:52.520 an election because
01:02:53.320 he made the
01:02:53.920 opponent unable
01:02:54.780 to run because
01:02:55.980 they got locked
01:02:56.640 up in the legal
01:02:57.740 system.
01:02:58.660 Would you be
01:02:59.080 okay with that?
01:03:00.540 You know, I
01:03:01.280 trust Americans
01:03:03.440 enough that there
01:03:05.280 would be enough
01:03:05.800 Democrats who
01:03:06.780 would say no
01:03:07.360 to that, that
01:03:09.780 a Republican
01:03:10.520 would somehow
01:03:11.400 be in charge
01:03:11.960 in the end.
01:03:13.220 I think
01:03:13.960 Democrats, not
01:03:15.860 all of them,
01:03:17.220 but I'd say a
01:03:18.220 solid 10% of
01:03:19.300 Democrats, if
01:03:20.400 you said, all
01:03:21.460 right, Trump
01:03:21.960 did bad things
01:03:22.800 and Biden took
01:03:23.740 him off the
01:03:24.160 field and made
01:03:25.500 it a non-competitive
01:03:26.540 election, how
01:03:27.660 many Democrats
01:03:28.340 would be okay
01:03:28.860 with that?
01:03:30.380 I don't think
01:03:31.260 all of them.
01:03:32.480 You'd only need
01:03:33.140 10% to side
01:03:34.720 with the
01:03:35.220 Republicans before
01:03:36.660 Republicans get
01:03:37.480 everything they
01:03:38.000 want.
01:03:40.260 You think it's
01:03:41.060 all?
01:03:42.280 I don't know.
01:03:42.800 I think if it
01:03:44.520 were the, well,
01:03:45.220 let me ask you
01:03:46.220 this.
01:03:46.800 Let's reverse it.
01:03:47.980 I know it
01:03:48.420 doesn't reverse,
01:03:49.220 but let's try.
01:03:51.380 Suppose Trump
01:03:53.020 were in office
01:03:53.700 and he put Joe
01:03:56.700 Biden in prison
01:03:57.600 over the, let's
01:03:59.840 say, the
01:04:00.120 Burisma stuff. 0.52
01:04:01.300 And when I
01:04:02.140 say Trump
01:04:02.820 did it, you
01:04:03.460 know, it
01:04:03.700 would be his
01:04:04.120 Department of
01:04:04.700 Justice that
01:04:05.240 would do it.
01:04:07.620 Would you be
01:04:08.300 okay with that?
01:04:09.980 Those of you
01:04:10.640 who lean right,
01:04:12.280 would you, you
01:04:12.780 would, literally,
01:04:14.060 you'd be okay
01:04:14.560 with that, jailing
01:04:15.880 his opponent
01:04:16.440 instead of
01:04:17.760 letting the
01:04:18.140 public decide.
01:04:20.860 Once he's in
01:04:21.600 the election, you
01:04:22.220 would be okay
01:04:22.680 with that.
01:04:24.000 Oh, I would
01:04:24.720 so not be okay
01:04:25.520 with that.
01:04:26.680 I would be very
01:04:27.840 not okay with
01:04:28.640 that.
01:04:29.860 And indeed, I
01:04:30.840 would say what
01:04:31.480 Comey said
01:04:32.180 about Hillary's
01:04:35.540 emails or
01:04:36.040 whatever it
01:04:36.380 was.
01:04:36.940 I think Comey
01:04:37.700 basically said
01:04:38.440 this should be
01:04:38.900 decided by the
01:04:39.620 public.
01:04:41.020 So I'll tell
01:04:41.520 the public, and
01:04:42.800 I don't think
01:04:43.260 the FBI should
01:04:44.180 be deciding who
01:04:45.160 wins the
01:04:45.500 election.
01:04:46.620 Now, you can
01:04:47.300 say you hate
01:04:47.900 Comey, you 1.00
01:04:48.480 can say he was
01:04:48.980 lying, blah,
01:04:49.820 blah, blah,
01:04:50.280 but I liked
01:04:51.160 what he said.
01:04:52.520 I liked that he
01:04:53.540 said we could
01:04:54.740 use the bureaucracy
01:04:55.620 to decide who
01:04:56.600 your president is,
01:04:58.440 or we could just
01:04:59.680 tell you what the
01:05:00.300 situation is, and
01:05:02.020 then you can
01:05:02.520 decide who the
01:05:03.120 president is.
01:05:04.460 Now, I'm not
01:05:06.820 going to defend
01:05:07.340 Comey, but I'm
01:05:08.680 going to defend
01:05:09.080 the concept.
01:05:10.740 I love the
01:05:11.660 concept that the
01:05:12.780 bureaucracy should
01:05:13.680 stay under the
01:05:14.360 decision once you
01:05:15.980 get into the
01:05:16.700 final push.
01:05:19.900 If you could
01:05:20.980 take a candidate
01:05:21.720 out before the
01:05:23.340 primaries, okay,
01:05:26.340 that's a very
01:05:27.080 different situation.
01:05:27.900 But once you're
01:05:30.520 polling at over
01:05:31.260 50%, like 0.90
01:05:32.600 Trump, at
01:05:33.880 least for the
01:05:34.860 primary, I
01:05:37.620 just don't think
01:05:38.320 you take them
01:05:38.760 out.
01:05:39.840 I think you
01:05:40.320 just live with
01:05:41.720 what you got.
01:05:42.780 And the reason
01:05:43.460 is you don't
01:05:43.980 want to start a
01:05:44.620 precedent where
01:05:46.240 one team in power
01:05:47.920 is trying to
01:05:48.440 arrest their
01:05:49.060 competition.
01:05:50.480 That just has
01:05:51.380 to be off the
01:05:52.120 table completely.
01:05:52.980 And now, the
01:05:55.600 downside is that
01:05:57.200 people will get
01:05:57.700 away with crime,
01:05:58.840 and I'm okay
01:05:59.400 with that, compared
01:06:01.420 to the
01:06:01.740 alternative.
01:06:03.300 I would totally
01:06:04.400 be in favor of
01:06:05.440 unequal justice
01:06:06.660 and some people
01:06:08.080 being treated
01:06:09.040 above the law,
01:06:10.060 because it would
01:06:11.480 be good for me.
01:06:13.260 If I have a
01:06:14.400 president who's
01:06:15.120 functioning, and
01:06:16.740 their only problem
01:06:17.440 was something they
01:06:18.580 may have done in
01:06:19.240 the past that's
01:06:20.600 not likely to be
01:06:21.700 repeated, at
01:06:22.340 least in the
01:06:22.740 same way, I
01:06:24.720 think it's like
01:06:25.980 hiring a plumber
01:06:26.820 who used to
01:06:29.220 drink, right?
01:06:31.240 If he used to
01:06:32.140 drink, but he
01:06:33.740 doesn't now, and
01:06:35.360 he can fix my
01:06:36.000 pipes, it's good
01:06:37.980 enough.
01:06:39.160 So you can be
01:06:40.940 selfish and just
01:06:42.800 vote for the
01:06:43.680 candidate who
01:06:44.500 will do the
01:06:44.880 best job for
01:06:45.660 whatever you
01:06:46.180 want done.
01:06:46.980 You don't have
01:06:47.960 to care about
01:06:49.360 things they did
01:06:50.060 in the past.
01:06:51.700 You can, but
01:06:53.040 you don't have
01:06:53.500 to.
01:06:54.280 You can just
01:06:54.760 vote for your
01:06:55.300 best interest.
01:07:00.660 All right.
01:07:06.280 Painters can
01:07:06.940 handle booze the 0.99
01:07:07.860 best.
01:07:08.780 Well, all right.
01:07:12.300 I think I've
01:07:13.060 talked about
01:07:13.500 everything that
01:07:14.000 needs to be
01:07:14.440 talked about,
01:07:15.300 except for
01:07:16.300 Justin Trudeau's
01:07:17.540 divorce.
01:07:18.020 did you see the
01:07:20.960 Babylon Bee's
01:07:21.800 take on that?
01:07:23.860 The Babylon Bee
01:07:25.000 said, the
01:07:26.460 country was
01:07:27.480 shocked to
01:07:29.460 learn that
01:07:29.940 Justin Trudeau
01:07:31.180 was married to
01:07:31.780 a woman.
01:07:34.940 They're pretty
01:07:35.660 edgy.
01:07:37.960 How many of you
01:07:39.020 expect that his
01:07:40.100 next partner will
01:07:40.980 be male?
01:07:41.460 not that there's
01:07:44.620 anything wrong
01:07:45.080 with that, but
01:07:46.940 isn't it a sort
01:07:47.780 of begging?
01:07:49.300 It feels like
01:07:50.360 reality is
01:07:53.200 forming up,
01:07:55.400 and honestly,
01:07:56.720 if he
01:07:57.360 transitioned, I
01:07:58.180 wouldn't be
01:07:58.500 surprised.
01:07:59.800 Would you?
01:08:01.800 Would anybody
01:08:02.660 be surprised if
01:08:04.300 he transitioned
01:08:04.900 to a woman?
01:08:06.440 I don't think
01:08:07.020 I wouldn't be
01:08:07.440 surprised at all.
01:08:08.100 I wouldn't
01:08:09.400 bet on it.
01:08:10.540 I would bet
01:08:10.980 against it,
01:08:12.000 but it
01:08:12.740 wouldn't surprise
01:08:13.220 me.
01:08:13.840 I would say,
01:08:14.360 well, who
01:08:16.220 would say we
01:08:16.960 didn't see it
01:08:17.440 coming, or it
01:08:18.940 was totally
01:08:19.360 impossible?
01:08:21.880 Nobody would
01:08:22.560 say it's
01:08:22.840 impossible.
01:08:23.800 I think you'd
01:08:24.260 say, well,
01:08:24.980 okay, good
01:08:26.560 luck to you.
01:08:33.440 Post some
01:08:34.060 shorts, I
01:08:34.600 probably should.
01:08:38.100 All right.
01:08:41.500 He has a
01:08:42.160 twin sister?
01:08:43.560 Is that
01:08:44.080 true?
01:08:44.860 Justin Trudeau
01:08:45.640 has a twin
01:08:46.120 sister?
01:08:49.100 Somebody's,
01:08:49.700 no?
01:08:51.100 Or he would
01:08:51.900 transition into
01:08:52.760 his twin sister?
01:08:54.760 All right, well,
01:08:55.320 we don't know what
01:08:56.060 family members he
01:08:56.920 has, so I'm
01:08:57.340 making that up,
01:08:57.960 I guess.
01:08:58.960 All right,
01:08:59.400 YouTube, thanks
01:09:00.320 for joining, and
01:09:00.980 thanks for joining
01:09:01.600 early.
01:09:02.060 Sorry I
01:09:02.600 inadvertently got
01:09:04.780 you in here too
01:09:05.320 early.
01:09:05.580 and I'll
01:09:07.160 see you
01:09:07.820 tomorrow.
01:09:09.260 Thank you.