Real Coffee with Scott Adams - August 03, 2023


Episode 2189 Scott Adams: Which Powerful Leader Goes Too Jail First? This Will Be A Good One


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 9 minutes

Words per Minute

142.31775

Word Count

9,913

Sentence Count

777

Misogynist Sentences

21

Hate Speech Sentences

26


Summary

I accidentally live streamed a live show for the first time on YouTube, and it's the best show you'll ever see! I accidentally hit the live button, so we're actually live, and we're in the show.


Transcript

00:00:00.960 Oh, did I accidentally turn on this live stream
00:00:04.260 when I was trying to actually take a profile picture?
00:00:09.860 Yeah, it looks like that actually happened.
00:00:14.040 So I guess it's just us.
00:00:16.720 Greg and Big Ron.
00:00:21.680 So the interface on this, on YouTube,
00:00:26.680 when you first turn it on
00:00:28.720 and it gets ready for the live stream,
00:00:30.860 the first thing it does
00:00:31.960 is it asks you for your profile picture
00:00:35.840 and you can change it.
00:00:37.660 And I was just changing it
00:00:39.140 except I pushed the live stream button
00:00:41.480 instead of the profile picture.
00:00:44.700 So you've got two choices.
00:00:48.700 You can hang with me for seven minutes
00:00:52.120 or you can come back in seven minutes.
00:00:56.520 You have two choices.
00:00:57.640 And the worst thing is
00:00:59.460 that this is what gets turned into the podcast.
00:01:04.460 But as luck would have it,
00:01:06.800 Spotify seems to have erased my account.
00:01:10.160 Don't know why yet.
00:01:11.860 But I disappeared yesterday from all podcasting
00:01:14.580 and the account that I used uploaded on Spotify.
00:01:18.620 It's a special, special account for podcasters.
00:01:21.200 It wiped my account.
00:01:26.020 Turned it into some other account with nothing in it.
00:01:31.020 So what we're going to do
00:01:33.060 is going to keep you going
00:01:35.000 and I'm going to have to do a few things here
00:01:38.040 to get ready for the locals crowd
00:01:41.040 and to print out my notes.
00:01:43.340 So you're going to see what the locals people see every day,
00:01:45.660 which is me getting ready for the show.
00:01:53.200 And I just realized I didn't have my microphone on.
00:01:58.400 Could you even hear me talking?
00:02:04.480 Premature
00:02:04.880 live streaming.
00:02:08.160 All right.
00:02:09.380 Well,
00:02:10.580 all right.
00:02:10.880 So here's my process,
00:02:12.120 in case you're wondering.
00:02:13.340 Right before showtime,
00:02:15.380 first thing I do is open up the locals people
00:02:20.140 because they usually get a preview,
00:02:23.140 but you're getting the preview now.
00:02:27.100 Now you can see what it's all about.
00:02:28.900 So they get to chat with me before I go live.
00:02:33.120 Tell me what I should be doing
00:02:34.340 and what I shouldn't be doing.
00:02:37.220 All right.
00:02:38.260 Let's call her up.
00:02:41.740 And I got to print out some notes
00:02:43.460 and send out a tweet.
00:02:49.360 But,
00:02:50.140 why is that light doing that?
00:02:52.540 Okay.
00:02:52.700 Okay.
00:02:52.800 This is also when I adjust the lighting.
00:03:03.000 So you get to see the whole process.
00:03:07.280 Let's bring in the locals people.
00:03:14.800 Hello, locals people.
00:03:16.720 So I did a dumb thing.
00:03:18.100 I accidentally hit the live button on YouTube
00:03:22.300 so we're actually live.
00:03:23.940 This is the show.
00:03:25.420 So we're right in the show.
00:03:28.020 No warm-up period today.
00:03:30.100 However,
00:03:30.840 at the top of the hour,
00:03:32.340 I'm going to pretend I'm starting the show.
00:03:34.860 But this,
00:03:36.760 today only,
00:03:38.540 the YouTube people
00:03:39.720 and the locals people
00:03:40.880 are on at the same time.
00:03:42.960 Same time.
00:03:43.980 So we're just going to go with it.
00:03:45.660 I got to print out my notes.
00:03:47.520 It's going to be the best show
00:03:48.420 you've ever seen since yesterday.
00:03:50.980 Well, yesterday is pretty good.
00:03:53.300 Today is going to be even better.
00:03:56.560 I woke up at 2.30 this morning.
00:04:00.880 No reason.
00:04:01.840 I just wasn't tired.
00:04:03.840 Do you ever wake up at 2.30
00:04:05.500 and you just say,
00:04:06.580 oh, hell,
00:04:07.900 I'll just get up.
00:04:09.960 Two and a half hours of sleep.
00:04:11.420 That was plenty.
00:04:14.720 No, it was actually three and a half.
00:04:16.160 Three and a half is plenty.
00:04:16.940 All right.
00:04:19.380 I got my notes.
00:04:20.520 All I need to do is tweet
00:04:21.960 and we're going to be good to go.
00:04:26.280 Or as I call it,
00:04:27.780 post.
00:04:28.800 Not tweeting.
00:04:30.140 Posting.
00:04:30.540 I don't know if it's worth
00:04:37.120 even posting over in truth.
00:04:40.860 I don't have any sense
00:04:42.040 that anybody comes from that source,
00:04:44.040 but we'll do it anyway.
00:04:47.340 All right.
00:04:48.160 I've tweeted.
00:04:48.860 I've done lights.
00:04:49.580 I'm going to take off
00:04:51.500 my microphone for a moment.
00:04:52.840 I'm going to take off
00:04:53.560 my microphone for a moment.
00:05:19.580 Tell me the truth.
00:05:28.220 Do I have the best
00:05:29.200 situation for a rolling chair?
00:05:32.160 Let me just look at this.
00:05:32.960 The best.
00:05:53.600 All right.
00:05:56.380 And that's why I don't have carpet.
00:05:58.740 No carpet.
00:05:59.840 It's got to be all pushing chairs.
00:06:01.320 All right.
00:06:02.360 Here's a true story
00:06:03.180 before we go live.
00:06:05.140 I want you to picture this.
00:06:06.840 I'm going to draw you
00:06:07.440 a little image with words.
00:06:11.340 When I was a kid,
00:06:12.880 I used to get,
00:06:13.760 I used to get babysitted
00:06:16.100 by my grandmother.
00:06:17.360 And she lived on a farm,
00:06:18.920 my uncle's farm,
00:06:20.480 that was walking distance
00:06:21.760 from where I lived.
00:06:23.660 And she would have,
00:06:26.500 she mostly lived
00:06:27.840 in one little part
00:06:29.260 of the farmhouse,
00:06:30.340 one room.
00:06:31.980 And the one room
00:06:33.740 that she lived in,
00:06:35.500 she liked to quilt.
00:06:38.480 So a quilt is pretty big.
00:06:40.120 If you've ever seen
00:06:40.720 somebody quilting,
00:06:42.100 they have to stretch out
00:06:43.320 the entire quilt,
00:06:45.060 you know,
00:06:45.840 the size of a,
00:06:46.700 I guess,
00:06:47.540 a quilt,
00:06:48.460 which took up,
00:06:50.720 I'd say,
00:06:51.740 80% of the center
00:06:53.140 of the room.
00:06:53.640 So the only,
00:06:56.060 the only space
00:06:57.860 you could walk
00:06:58.640 in this room,
00:06:59.400 remember,
00:07:00.760 I had to stay there
00:07:01.700 all day.
00:07:03.540 I'm a little kid,
00:07:05.020 and I have to stay here
00:07:06.200 all day in this room
00:07:07.400 with a quilt
00:07:08.700 taking up 80%
00:07:09.960 of the center.
00:07:10.740 So the only place
00:07:11.660 that you could walk
00:07:12.540 or be
00:07:13.540 was around the outside
00:07:14.580 of the quilt.
00:07:15.200 because, you know,
00:07:16.820 the weather was bad.
00:07:18.860 So my grandmother,
00:07:20.080 who was a very
00:07:20.760 obese woman,
00:07:23.860 she had a,
00:07:24.500 she had an office chair
00:07:26.320 that she would push
00:07:27.080 around to work
00:07:27.920 on the quilt.
00:07:28.420 So all day long
00:07:29.800 I had to get up
00:07:30.420 and move
00:07:30.860 because grandma
00:07:31.720 was moving the quilt
00:07:32.680 or moving her chair.
00:07:35.000 All right.
00:07:36.040 We are live
00:07:38.000 because I accidentally
00:07:39.620 started early.
00:07:41.000 So I'm going to pretend
00:07:42.400 as if we didn't start early
00:07:44.800 because this is
00:07:45.780 the starting time.
00:07:48.100 And just go with it.
00:07:50.500 As far as you know,
00:07:52.100 I just turned it on
00:07:53.560 and you haven't seen
00:07:54.400 anything until now.
00:07:56.580 Do, do, do, do, do, do.
00:07:58.420 Do, do, do, do, do, do.
00:08:00.500 Do, do, do, do, do, do, do, do.
00:08:03.900 Do, do, do, do, do.
00:08:06.960 Good morning, everybody.
00:08:08.500 And welcome to the highlight
00:08:10.280 of human civilization
00:08:11.400 where all questions
00:08:12.760 are answered,
00:08:14.080 all mysteries are solved.
00:08:16.580 And I'll tell you
00:08:17.540 exactly what to do
00:08:18.500 in the future
00:08:18.980 if you'd like this experience
00:08:20.420 to go up to levels
00:08:21.320 where nobody's ever
00:08:22.940 seen them before.
00:08:24.380 All you need is
00:08:25.180 a cup or a mug
00:08:25.780 or a glass,
00:08:26.540 a tank or a chalice,
00:08:27.240 a canteen,
00:08:27.920 jug or a flask,
00:08:29.000 a vessel of any kind,
00:08:30.860 fill it with your
00:08:31.520 favorite liquid.
00:08:33.220 I like coffee.
00:08:34.560 And join me now
00:08:35.360 for the unparalleled
00:08:36.520 pleasure of the dopamine
00:08:37.660 of the day,
00:08:38.320 the thing that makes
00:08:38.840 everything better.
00:08:39.760 It's called
00:08:40.140 the simultaneous sip.
00:08:42.240 It happens now.
00:08:43.120 Go.
00:08:43.280 Go.
00:08:47.720 Ah.
00:08:49.840 Better than usual.
00:08:52.640 That's just the way
00:08:53.540 I like it.
00:08:54.860 Above average.
00:08:55.820 All right.
00:08:59.560 Let's see what's going on.
00:09:00.820 Are you following
00:09:01.480 the drama
00:09:02.560 with the room temperature
00:09:04.680 superconductive material?
00:09:07.380 I told you about it
00:09:08.400 the other day
00:09:09.000 that there was
00:09:09.600 one researcher
00:09:10.840 who said,
00:09:12.120 oh,
00:09:12.380 we can make
00:09:12.920 superconductivity
00:09:14.080 at room temperature.
00:09:15.460 Now,
00:09:15.860 if that were true,
00:09:17.600 it would change
00:09:18.660 civilization.
00:09:20.100 Now,
00:09:20.680 it's hard to explain why,
00:09:21.960 but you could
00:09:23.060 fundamentally do
00:09:23.940 things with
00:09:24.780 electronics
00:09:25.620 that would be
00:09:26.720 impossible otherwise.
00:09:28.460 So,
00:09:28.980 you could have
00:09:29.360 your quantum computing
00:09:30.480 and you could have
00:09:31.520 your lossless
00:09:32.460 energy transmission
00:09:33.680 and God knows what.
00:09:35.740 Right?
00:09:35.960 So,
00:09:36.180 it just really
00:09:37.060 would change everything.
00:09:38.220 But,
00:09:39.760 it would have to be true.
00:09:41.700 If it's not true,
00:09:43.180 it doesn't change anything.
00:09:44.940 So,
00:09:45.600 there was so much
00:09:46.420 interest that a
00:09:47.380 group got together
00:09:48.500 just to see if
00:09:49.220 they could replicate it.
00:09:50.220 So,
00:09:51.080 scientists are
00:09:52.220 trying to replicate it
00:09:54.760 right now.
00:09:55.560 And here's the
00:09:56.200 interesting thing.
00:09:59.460 Apparently,
00:10:00.320 they can.
00:10:02.040 Apparently,
00:10:02.900 they can.
00:10:04.020 Now,
00:10:04.500 I'm not,
00:10:05.060 I don't think we can
00:10:06.580 quite conclude it yet,
00:10:09.040 but the reports
00:10:10.240 are coming in
00:10:11.120 that they are
00:10:13.040 successfully
00:10:13.900 replicating it
00:10:15.020 in different places.
00:10:18.400 That is amazing.
00:10:20.220 It's amazing.
00:10:22.640 Now,
00:10:23.420 I'm still not
00:10:24.740 quite ready
00:10:25.760 to say it's all true.
00:10:27.920 Right?
00:10:28.400 Because,
00:10:28.920 you know,
00:10:29.520 it could be like
00:10:30.400 fusion.
00:10:31.000 You always think
00:10:31.480 you're there
00:10:31.840 and then you're not.
00:10:32.940 Flying cars,
00:10:34.180 we're almost there,
00:10:36.020 but not.
00:10:37.080 So,
00:10:37.420 maybe,
00:10:38.660 maybe.
00:10:39.580 Now,
00:10:39.780 remember,
00:10:40.280 the big deal
00:10:40.880 about this
00:10:41.380 is not just
00:10:42.060 that it would be
00:10:42.620 a miracle
00:10:44.080 of technology.
00:10:45.000 the big deal
00:10:46.440 about it
00:10:46.840 is that the
00:10:47.360 materials to do
00:10:48.480 it are common.
00:10:51.600 It's common
00:10:52.280 materials.
00:10:53.580 Apparently,
00:10:54.160 they could ramp
00:10:54.700 it up.
00:10:56.140 If this thing
00:10:57.080 works,
00:10:58.180 the ramp up
00:10:58.960 will be
00:10:59.740 maybe astonishing.
00:11:01.220 You know,
00:11:01.340 the startups
00:11:01.820 will just
00:11:02.340 appear out of
00:11:02.960 nowhere.
00:11:03.920 So,
00:11:04.240 we'll see.
00:11:04.740 There could be
00:11:05.140 some amazing
00:11:05.780 stuff coming.
00:11:06.860 Speaking of
00:11:07.540 amazing stuff,
00:11:08.460 RFK Jr.,
00:11:09.500 in a tweet,
00:11:13.660 he's saying
00:11:14.100 that if he's
00:11:14.640 elected,
00:11:15.180 he will end
00:11:15.760 chronic disease
00:11:16.820 in this country.
00:11:19.120 That's pretty good.
00:11:21.420 Do you think
00:11:22.220 he could do it?
00:11:23.560 I think what
00:11:24.460 he would be
00:11:24.920 aiming at
00:11:25.520 would be
00:11:26.280 the food supply
00:11:27.340 and our
00:11:28.900 pharmaceutical
00:11:29.540 products.
00:11:31.860 His belief
00:11:32.900 is that the
00:11:33.580 combination of
00:11:34.260 those two,
00:11:34.900 I think I'm
00:11:36.400 characterizing
00:11:37.020 this right.
00:11:37.960 I think his
00:11:38.500 belief that
00:11:39.120 in all
00:11:40.160 likelihood,
00:11:41.700 some combination
00:11:42.880 of pharmaceuticals
00:11:44.760 plus our
00:11:45.200 food supply
00:11:45.860 are causing
00:11:46.660 all kinds
00:11:47.100 of inflammation
00:11:47.760 and chronic
00:11:48.480 diseases.
00:11:49.740 I think he's
00:11:50.720 right.
00:11:52.120 I don't know
00:11:52.860 how solvable
00:11:53.520 that is,
00:11:55.040 but I think
00:11:55.580 he's right.
00:11:56.620 And I have
00:11:57.540 a prediction.
00:11:59.420 It goes
00:11:59.920 like this.
00:12:01.360 Someday,
00:12:02.120 somebody's
00:12:02.540 going to make
00:12:02.980 a personal
00:12:04.080 indoor farming
00:12:05.340 product that's
00:12:07.480 scalable and
00:12:08.720 modular and
00:12:09.800 it works.
00:12:12.240 So that your
00:12:13.040 house can
00:12:13.780 grow most
00:12:15.160 of, you know,
00:12:15.800 maybe 80%
00:12:16.560 of the food
00:12:17.000 you need.
00:12:18.480 But at the
00:12:20.080 moment, you
00:12:20.560 would need too
00:12:20.960 much space and
00:12:21.940 energy and all
00:12:22.640 that.
00:12:23.300 But I don't
00:12:23.780 think that's
00:12:24.220 going to last.
00:12:24.840 I feel like
00:12:27.160 if we build
00:12:29.500 up instead of
00:12:30.580 on the ground,
00:12:31.360 you know,
00:12:31.600 you do
00:12:31.860 vertical stuff,
00:12:33.580 you don't need
00:12:34.180 dirt if you
00:12:34.860 use hydroponics,
00:12:36.120 you don't need
00:12:36.720 electricity if you've
00:12:37.660 got solar.
00:12:39.300 I feel like
00:12:40.480 you don't need,
00:12:41.460 you wouldn't need
00:12:42.200 pesticides if it's
00:12:43.240 indoors.
00:12:43.620 I feel like
00:12:45.560 all the
00:12:46.200 components are
00:12:47.820 in place.
00:12:49.280 The indoor
00:12:49.820 gardening should
00:12:50.920 start working.
00:12:53.180 But I've been
00:12:54.680 saying that for
00:12:55.160 a while and it
00:12:55.680 hasn't happened
00:12:56.100 yet.
00:12:56.620 So I'll continue
00:12:58.060 to be optimistic
00:12:58.920 that we can end
00:13:00.400 chronic disease by
00:13:01.520 growing our own
00:13:02.160 food.
00:13:03.340 Correct me if I'm
00:13:04.040 wrong, but the
00:13:05.800 reason that our
00:13:06.460 food supply is
00:13:08.120 allegedly so
00:13:09.520 unhealthy would be
00:13:10.800 because of all the
00:13:11.500 additives.
00:13:12.620 Am I right?
00:13:13.740 It's the pesticides
00:13:14.520 and the additives.
00:13:16.260 If you're just
00:13:17.000 eating the food
00:13:17.940 and it's fresh
00:13:19.100 off the vine,
00:13:20.660 isn't it going to
00:13:21.320 taste delicious?
00:13:22.600 You wouldn't have
00:13:23.360 to add a lot of
00:13:23.940 sugars, you wouldn't
00:13:25.520 have to add a lot
00:13:26.200 of salt unless you
00:13:27.560 liked it.
00:13:28.860 I feel if you're
00:13:29.780 eating it off the
00:13:30.380 vine, I don't know
00:13:31.420 how many of you
00:13:31.960 have ever had this
00:13:32.920 experience.
00:13:34.060 You buy a tomato
00:13:35.300 in the grocery
00:13:35.960 store and you eat
00:13:38.020 it and you say to
00:13:39.000 yourself, I don't
00:13:40.620 know why anybody
00:13:41.320 buys tomatoes.
00:13:43.380 They just taste
00:13:44.220 like cardboard
00:13:44.840 and that's because
00:13:46.240 they come off the
00:13:47.040 vine green and
00:13:48.020 they gas it to
00:13:48.940 make it red.
00:13:49.920 So it's not even
00:13:50.840 vine ripened most
00:13:51.780 of the time.
00:13:53.420 But if you grow
00:13:54.320 your own tomatoes,
00:13:55.240 how many of you
00:13:55.840 have had this
00:13:56.320 experience?
00:13:57.620 You take one
00:13:58.480 off the vine,
00:13:59.300 you cut it in half,
00:14:00.160 you put a little
00:14:00.640 salt on it and
00:14:02.120 you think you've
00:14:02.780 eaten the best
00:14:03.780 thing you've ever
00:14:04.600 had in your mouth.
00:14:06.160 The difference
00:14:06.960 between a grocery
00:14:08.120 store tomato that
00:14:09.220 really you shouldn't
00:14:09.960 eat at all.
00:14:11.220 There's no right
00:14:12.140 time to eat a
00:14:12.780 grocery store tomato.
00:14:14.880 Maybe if it's a
00:14:16.260 greenhouse tomato or
00:14:17.240 something, but the
00:14:18.380 gas ripened ones,
00:14:20.020 never.
00:14:21.160 There's no time to
00:14:22.040 eat that.
00:14:22.680 There's not enough
00:14:23.320 nutrition in it that
00:14:24.280 you should bother and
00:14:26.120 won't taste good.
00:14:28.300 So home farming
00:14:29.780 solves a lot of
00:14:30.820 problems if we can
00:14:31.560 get there.
00:14:31.900 Well, you probably
00:14:34.260 heard that the
00:14:34.860 rating agency Fitch
00:14:36.360 has downgraded the
00:14:38.100 U.S. credit rating
00:14:38.980 from 2AA plus from
00:14:42.040 AAA.
00:14:43.100 So that would put us
00:14:44.060 around fifth or so
00:14:46.060 of developed nations
00:14:48.020 in credit ranking.
00:14:49.580 So we'd have places
00:14:50.860 like Sweden would be
00:14:51.860 above us, I think.
00:14:54.000 And I don't know
00:14:56.280 what to think about
00:14:56.960 this.
00:14:58.040 Now, obviously,
00:14:58.820 the Biden
00:14:59.320 administration blamed
00:15:00.740 to the Trump
00:15:01.320 administration, and
00:15:02.800 everybody kind of
00:15:03.580 laughed, but maybe
00:15:04.640 it's a little bit
00:15:05.260 true as well.
00:15:06.640 Because I don't
00:15:07.200 think any of our
00:15:08.920 presidents did a
00:15:09.780 good job on debt,
00:15:12.460 did they?
00:15:14.200 Who was the
00:15:15.020 president who did a
00:15:15.820 good job on debt?
00:15:17.260 I don't remember
00:15:17.900 one.
00:15:19.140 Clinton?
00:15:19.800 Bill Clinton?
00:15:21.420 Bill Clinton, right?
00:15:22.580 Wasn't he the last
00:15:23.240 one?
00:15:25.160 Weirdly.
00:15:26.100 Yeah.
00:15:27.020 So I would say
00:15:29.000 there's some blame
00:15:29.700 to share on that
00:15:30.600 one, but if you're
00:15:31.700 the party that's
00:15:32.420 been in power for
00:15:33.440 two and a half
00:15:34.520 years, you've got
00:15:35.760 a little bit more
00:15:36.640 explaining than the
00:15:37.500 one who's out of
00:15:38.660 power.
00:15:41.940 Now, although I
00:15:43.500 have a, as I tell
00:15:45.160 you too often, a
00:15:46.340 degree in economics,
00:15:48.340 and I've got an
00:15:48.860 MBA from a top
00:15:49.880 school, but I have
00:15:52.700 no idea what this
00:15:53.980 debt downgrade means
00:15:57.300 in terms of the
00:15:58.280 real world.
00:15:58.800 now, obviously, you
00:16:01.140 should make interest
00:16:01.860 rates go up, because
00:16:03.860 the higher interest
00:16:05.080 rates compensate for
00:16:06.480 the risk of, you
00:16:07.860 know, the entire
00:16:08.620 thing.
00:16:09.620 So we should see
00:16:10.980 higher interest
00:16:11.620 rates.
00:16:13.260 But we have this
00:16:14.240 weird situation where
00:16:15.200 the economy is kind
00:16:16.220 of strong.
00:16:17.740 So you've got a
00:16:18.760 generally strong
00:16:19.620 economy with good
00:16:20.640 employment, but you've
00:16:22.620 got a really serious
00:16:24.480 problem with the debt
00:16:25.560 and with the debt and
00:16:26.820 the interest rates and
00:16:27.680 stuff.
00:16:28.780 I don't know.
00:16:30.040 I don't know what the
00:16:31.640 net of this is.
00:16:33.280 So I've decided not to
00:16:34.660 worry about it.
00:16:37.580 I'm not sure that's
00:16:38.560 rational, but I don't
00:16:39.980 know what else I'm going
00:16:40.740 to do.
00:16:41.560 Am I going to go out and
00:16:42.460 do something different?
00:16:45.300 Am I going to act
00:16:46.260 different today?
00:16:46.960 So one of the things I
00:16:49.600 do to maintain my
00:16:50.960 sanity is if there's
00:16:54.180 something I can't do
00:16:55.040 anything about, and
00:16:56.520 this seems to be in
00:16:57.280 that category, I don't
00:16:59.200 worry about it.
00:17:00.840 There's nothing I can
00:17:01.840 do.
00:17:03.580 How many of you are
00:17:06.000 able to do that?
00:17:08.260 I just do not worry
00:17:09.920 about things I can't
00:17:10.960 have any control over.
00:17:12.880 So there's, you know,
00:17:13.740 what is it, Desiderado,
00:17:14.880 the famous saying, you
00:17:16.240 know, don't worry about
00:17:16.900 the things you can't
00:17:17.720 control, but the things
00:17:19.400 you can control, like
00:17:22.320 your fitness, your
00:17:23.340 exercise, your diet, you
00:17:25.320 should control the hell
00:17:26.920 out of those.
00:17:29.020 That's the best advice
00:17:30.160 I'll ever give you.
00:17:31.280 If you can't control it,
00:17:33.040 stop worrying about it.
00:17:34.600 You'll have to deal with
00:17:35.520 it if something goes
00:17:36.200 wrong.
00:17:36.680 If there's something you
00:17:37.720 can do to prepare, go
00:17:39.580 ahead and do it.
00:17:40.520 But if there's nothing
00:17:41.500 you can do, let it go.
00:17:44.640 Because the world is full
00:17:46.000 of things that there's
00:17:47.240 nothing you can do.
00:17:48.680 If a meteor is going to
00:17:50.360 come out of the sky
00:17:51.000 tomorrow and kill you,
00:17:53.260 well, there's nothing
00:17:53.900 you can do.
00:17:54.540 I mean, if you didn't
00:17:55.360 know about it.
00:17:56.740 So don't worry about
00:17:57.740 things there's nothing
00:17:58.440 you can do about.
00:17:59.220 This death thing is one
00:18:00.140 of them.
00:18:01.260 But do worry about
00:18:02.360 those things you can
00:18:03.160 control and control
00:18:04.420 them like crazy.
00:18:05.480 You'll be much happier.
00:18:07.140 Fitness and exercise
00:18:08.160 at the top of the list.
00:18:10.140 All right.
00:18:10.360 So the current makeup
00:18:11.760 of the Republican
00:18:12.660 and Democrat Party
00:18:13.880 is starting to become
00:18:15.760 clear.
00:18:17.100 How many of you
00:18:17.980 remember that maybe
00:18:19.720 it was 2016 the first
00:18:21.500 time I said that the
00:18:23.180 Democrat Party is the
00:18:24.900 woman party and the
00:18:27.620 Republicans are becoming
00:18:28.620 a male party?
00:18:30.120 And it turns out the
00:18:31.220 numbers are backing that,
00:18:32.660 but it's not exactly that.
00:18:34.080 It has more to do with
00:18:34.900 married versus unmarried.
00:18:36.180 And, well, here are the
00:18:39.180 stats.
00:18:41.300 Republicans have more
00:18:43.500 married men by 20
00:18:44.880 points and more married
00:18:47.100 women by 14 points.
00:18:49.300 So if you're married,
00:18:50.520 you're far more likely to
00:18:51.920 be a Republican at the
00:18:53.360 moment.
00:18:53.920 Now, that could have to
00:18:54.640 do with age.
00:18:56.700 Age could be a big part
00:18:57.700 of that because Republicans
00:18:58.920 are older.
00:19:01.560 But single women are the
00:19:03.580 biggest category, I guess,
00:19:06.180 and the Democrats, we're
00:19:07.100 the big standout category.
00:19:09.200 So what happens if you
00:19:11.400 have one political party
00:19:12.600 that is dominated by the
00:19:16.000 opinions of married
00:19:17.120 people, both male and
00:19:18.800 female, both male and
00:19:21.040 female, but married?
00:19:23.540 And you compare that to a
00:19:25.120 political party that would
00:19:26.160 be dominated by, not
00:19:27.920 entirely, but dominated by
00:19:29.460 single women.
00:19:30.640 And I would like you to put
00:19:33.600 on your most bigoted,
00:19:35.160 awful hat.
00:19:37.620 Oh, just be a jerk for a
00:19:39.920 minute.
00:19:40.280 Can you?
00:19:41.840 Just be a jerk for a
00:19:44.300 minute.
00:19:45.640 Which of those two groups is
00:19:47.240 going to make better
00:19:47.840 decisions?
00:19:49.160 Single women or married
00:19:51.120 people, both male and
00:19:52.320 female?
00:19:52.580 What do you think?
00:19:59.880 Would you trust decisions
00:20:01.400 that were made primarily by
00:20:02.800 single women?
00:20:06.040 And I'm asking you to put
00:20:07.580 on your most bigoted,
00:20:09.600 biased hat.
00:20:12.620 Because you know what?
00:20:14.140 It's not really about male
00:20:15.560 versus female.
00:20:17.120 Because like I said, the
00:20:19.280 married people seem to be on
00:20:20.620 one side, you know, a
00:20:21.820 little bit more than the
00:20:23.360 other side.
00:20:24.540 And the single people seem
00:20:25.900 to be on the other side,
00:20:26.720 except not the men.
00:20:29.100 But I could have asked the
00:20:30.300 same question.
00:20:31.140 Let me reverse the
00:20:32.160 question.
00:20:33.220 Suppose the situation was
00:20:35.300 that one of the parties,
00:20:36.460 it doesn't matter which one,
00:20:37.640 it's just hypothetical, was
00:20:39.600 dominated by single men.
00:20:42.720 Single men.
00:20:44.000 And let's say the other
00:20:44.900 party had all the single
00:20:46.180 women and had all the
00:20:47.840 married people, male and
00:20:49.060 female.
00:20:49.300 But one of the parties was
00:20:50.900 mostly single men.
00:20:52.920 Would you trust their
00:20:54.060 political decisions?
00:20:56.280 Single men.
00:20:58.520 I wouldn't.
00:21:00.080 Are you kidding?
00:21:01.480 Are you freaking crazy?
00:21:03.300 Have you ever met a single
00:21:04.620 man?
00:21:06.020 Single men are the most
00:21:07.320 reckless, untrustworthy
00:21:09.040 group of people I can even
00:21:10.340 imagine.
00:21:11.160 There's only one group I can
00:21:12.460 imagine that would be as
00:21:13.940 untrustworthy as a bunch of
00:21:15.820 single men.
00:21:16.440 men.
00:21:18.140 It would be single women.
00:21:21.060 Yeah.
00:21:21.860 Single women.
00:21:24.700 Now, I'm not going to claim
00:21:26.100 that single women would make
00:21:27.660 worse decisions than single
00:21:29.220 men, but I wouldn't want
00:21:30.980 either one of them in charge.
00:21:33.280 Right.
00:21:34.000 Now, again, could I do an
00:21:36.660 aside for the dumb people?
00:21:38.080 Are there any dumb people
00:21:39.040 here watching?
00:21:40.760 Does anybody need these
00:21:42.540 special dumb people
00:21:43.680 explanation?
00:21:45.140 I'll give it to you.
00:21:46.240 All right.
00:21:46.760 I'll need Dale.
00:21:47.360 Dale, this is true for all
00:21:50.820 conversations in which we
00:21:52.280 refer to groups or group
00:21:54.160 averages.
00:21:55.840 Why are you saying that every
00:21:57.140 single, single person has the
00:21:58.380 same?
00:21:59.820 Well, I'm not, Dale.
00:22:00.840 I'm not saying that at all.
00:22:02.720 It's more like an average
00:22:03.840 thing, you know.
00:22:06.000 But why are you saying that
00:22:07.820 every single, single person
00:22:09.900 can't make a good political
00:22:11.200 decision?
00:22:13.560 I'm literally not saying that.
00:22:15.240 I'm saying nothing like that.
00:22:17.360 Nothing like that.
00:22:19.560 Individuals, of course, are
00:22:20.540 all over the map.
00:22:21.620 It's just sort of a
00:22:22.240 generality.
00:22:24.260 And yet, you seem to think
00:22:25.640 that every single person
00:22:27.160 can't make a good decision.
00:22:30.900 And see.
00:22:33.620 So for the benefit of the
00:22:34.960 stupid people, it never
00:22:36.900 means all the people.
00:22:39.460 It never, never, it never
00:22:41.660 means all the people.
00:22:44.640 All right.
00:22:45.600 But let, all right, how
00:22:47.000 many of you have had the
00:22:47.920 experience of going from
00:22:49.280 single to married, and
00:22:50.740 especially having children,
00:22:52.240 and found that you make
00:22:53.480 different decisions and you
00:22:54.640 have different priorities
00:22:55.540 about politics?
00:22:56.780 Go.
00:22:57.560 How many of you found, as
00:23:00.020 soon as you got married,
00:23:02.080 well, you were a little more
00:23:03.660 conservative, perhaps?
00:23:06.600 Right?
00:23:07.800 So I think getting married
00:23:09.120 makes you conservative, as
00:23:11.100 well as being conservative, makes
00:23:12.700 you're perhaps more likely to
00:23:14.220 get married.
00:23:17.420 So, I would say that's a big
00:23:19.840 problem for the Democrats.
00:23:21.340 And again, if you think that's
00:23:23.180 about women versus men, it's
00:23:24.800 not.
00:23:25.860 It's about single people.
00:23:28.580 Single people, they need a
00:23:31.440 little help.
00:23:32.040 I mean, they certainly should be
00:23:33.420 part of the process, of course.
00:23:35.700 But I wouldn't trust any single
00:23:37.420 people to make decisions for the
00:23:39.520 country.
00:23:41.180 All right.
00:23:42.360 Let's talk about Devin Archer.
00:23:45.020 You're all following the story.
00:23:46.740 Hunter Biden's partner.
00:23:48.840 He's given up the goods.
00:23:51.380 But Jonathan Turley talks about
00:23:53.080 this, and on Twitter, he says
00:23:55.800 there was a discussion of a
00:23:59.460 $142,000 purchase of a luxury
00:24:02.140 car for Hunter as part of his
00:24:04.560 payments for the Burisma work, I
00:24:08.580 guess, and that the Ukrainians
00:24:12.160 wanted Hunter Biden to help
00:24:13.500 relieve pressure from the
00:24:15.540 prosecutors looking into
00:24:17.200 corruption.
00:24:18.320 They wanted the Bidens to take
00:24:19.980 the heat off.
00:24:21.660 Biden later insisted on the
00:24:23.100 firing of the prosecutor.
00:24:25.760 Now, that's interesting.
00:24:28.040 That testimony would seem to be
00:24:30.000 at odds with everything that the
00:24:33.180 mainstream media told us.
00:24:35.360 I believe the mainstream media
00:24:36.660 told us that everybody wanted
00:24:38.880 that prosecutor fired.
00:24:40.840 Oh, other countries, other
00:24:42.480 entities, organizations.
00:24:45.620 Yeah.
00:24:47.160 Everybody.
00:24:48.760 You just ask anybody.
00:24:50.480 Everybody wanted him.
00:24:51.620 But it turns out that the people
00:24:53.300 who wanted him fired the most, and
00:24:55.600 we now have documentation of that,
00:24:58.220 good, credible evidence.
00:24:59.260 The people who most wanted that
00:25:01.700 prosecutor fired were Burisma
00:25:05.400 themselves.
00:25:07.520 Burisma wanted the prosecutor
00:25:09.080 fired, asked for it specifically.
00:25:11.700 It was a priority, and they asked
00:25:13.680 the Bidens to get it done, and then
00:25:15.380 the Bidens did it.
00:25:17.200 So, point number one, it doesn't
00:25:20.760 matter how many other people thought
00:25:22.560 it was a good idea.
00:25:23.840 There's a very clear record that the
00:25:26.260 reason it was done is because
00:25:28.440 Burisma wanted it done, and they
00:25:29.960 were paying the Bidens to get it
00:25:31.080 done, and then it got done.
00:25:33.620 And it's really clear.
00:25:35.640 Like, there's no real doubt about it,
00:25:37.580 right?
00:25:38.480 Now, here's my question for you.
00:25:41.380 It's been how many days, and you
00:25:44.380 could argue years, that we've been
00:25:47.920 arguing about this prosecutor, and
00:25:50.400 the Democrats keep saying, but
00:25:52.420 everybody wanted him fired.
00:25:53.800 It wasn't an American thing.
00:25:56.500 Who are those other people?
00:25:59.020 Well, give me a name.
00:26:00.900 Give me an interview.
00:26:02.340 Show me one person in one big entity
00:26:05.780 anywhere who is asking for him to be
00:26:08.180 fired.
00:26:09.960 And then, once you have those names,
00:26:12.480 because there probably are some names,
00:26:14.080 once you have those names, tell me
00:26:16.460 where they got their information.
00:26:19.580 Independently?
00:26:21.020 Do you think there were a lot of
00:26:22.400 people who were asking about the
00:26:25.020 prosecutor in Ukraine?
00:26:27.460 Hey, we'd like to talk to you in
00:26:30.260 Israel, Prime Minister Netanyahu.
00:26:33.400 How do you feel about that
00:26:34.900 prosecutor in Ukraine who's going
00:26:37.300 after that company you never heard of
00:26:38.860 until recently?
00:26:41.980 It was never real.
00:26:44.380 Once you see the mechanism, you can
00:26:47.860 see it everywhere.
00:26:48.520 Do you remember the 50 Intel people who
00:26:51.400 said the laptop wasn't real?
00:26:54.580 How was that play organized?
00:26:56.740 It was organized by some prominent
00:26:58.980 Democrat, getting other Democrats who
00:27:01.900 were willing to say literally anything,
00:27:04.880 to simply say that something was true,
00:27:07.140 so that the other people could look at
00:27:08.960 the people they told to say it was
00:27:10.300 true, and say, well, it's not us, look
00:27:12.420 at all these people.
00:27:13.800 But these people they told to say it
00:27:15.360 was true.
00:27:16.380 They're not independent voices at all.
00:27:18.040 So when you do that trick, you can
00:27:21.080 launder your opinion through the
00:27:22.560 media as though it's coming from
00:27:24.400 experts, when in fact the experts were
00:27:26.640 just doing what they were told.
00:27:28.860 Now take that situation, which you know
00:27:31.080 to exist, so you know that's a play.
00:27:34.200 That's a known play.
00:27:36.660 Get a bunch of people to pretend it's
00:27:38.240 true, and then just point to them.
00:27:40.500 Now what did they do with the
00:27:42.800 prosecutor?
00:27:43.340 They got a bunch of people that they said
00:27:47.900 were other credible people to tell you
00:27:50.680 that this guy needed to be fired, so they
00:27:53.240 didn't have to make the argument
00:27:54.320 themselves.
00:27:55.340 They said, look at all these people.
00:27:57.120 Hey, come on, look at all these people.
00:27:59.280 It's the same play.
00:28:01.480 You see it, right?
00:28:03.080 Once you see their plays, you see it
00:28:05.780 everywhere.
00:28:06.220 All right, here's another one.
00:28:07.420 Remember the Democrats always do the play
00:28:09.520 where if they do something, they say the
00:28:12.420 other side is doing it, right?
00:28:14.340 Whatever they're doing, they say the
00:28:15.520 other side is doing it.
00:28:16.840 So what did they say when Biden fired
00:28:22.520 the prosecutor?
00:28:24.100 They said, oh, the other side is trying
00:28:27.700 to protect him because the prosecutor is
00:28:30.660 the problem, right?
00:28:32.340 That's the opposite of what was the
00:28:34.340 reality.
00:28:34.660 So you see them selling the opposite of
00:28:38.720 truth fairly often.
00:28:40.960 It's just what they do.
00:28:43.220 They blame the other side of doing what
00:28:45.000 they're doing.
00:28:46.100 So what they were doing is some bad
00:28:50.120 behavior with the prosecutor.
00:28:52.080 What they accuse the other side of, bad
00:28:55.200 behavior about a prosecutor.
00:28:57.300 They just blame you for whatever they're
00:28:58.980 doing.
00:29:00.220 So that's happening.
00:29:02.140 Now, what's interesting about that is
00:29:04.160 there's not really much doubt about
00:29:08.160 this, you know, this connection of
00:29:10.320 evidence.
00:29:10.900 It's really, I mean, I suppose you could
00:29:13.500 be surprised at anything, but does
00:29:16.480 anybody think this isn't very clear at
00:29:18.740 this point, just the prosecutor part?
00:29:21.820 Is there anybody who thinks that isn't
00:29:23.160 perfectly clear that that was a dirty
00:29:26.000 situation?
00:29:27.300 There's nobody, right?
00:29:28.900 Nobody can look at this evidence and
00:29:30.460 say, well, that looked okay to me.
00:29:32.140 I don't think.
00:29:35.320 All right.
00:29:37.040 So Vivek is, Ramaswamy, is today at the
00:29:41.680 courthouse where Trump's going to be
00:29:43.100 arraigned.
00:29:44.620 And I have one question about Vivek
00:29:48.340 Ramaswamy.
00:29:49.420 How many of them are there?
00:29:53.880 Does it seem to me that he's actually
00:29:55.780 physically everywhere the news is?
00:29:58.940 Like, every time there's a story, he's
00:30:00.960 standing on the steps of the building
00:30:02.640 where the news is.
00:30:04.300 How much does he travel?
00:30:07.480 What the hell is going on?
00:30:10.300 How is Vivek everywhere?
00:30:12.660 He's actually creating a, the illusion
00:30:15.620 that he's just part of every story.
00:30:18.100 He's killing it.
00:30:19.240 I'll say it again because I'm so impressed.
00:30:23.260 It's the best political campaign in my
00:30:26.220 lifetime, which is not to say he'll win because
00:30:29.440 there are lots of other factors, but it is the
00:30:31.600 best political campaign.
00:30:33.080 I mean, he's nailing it every day.
00:30:36.760 He's hitting like three top stories a day and
00:30:40.240 standing where the story is.
00:30:42.120 All three of them.
00:30:43.560 I might be making up three.
00:30:46.100 But you just, you just have to watch the show.
00:30:50.000 Compare him to anything that anybody else is doing.
00:30:53.580 You know, Trump stands out as a singular character.
00:30:57.040 But compared to Vivek, any normal person,
00:31:00.200 DeSantis or anything, he's just clearing the field.
00:31:05.060 It really is no competition in terms of
00:31:07.240 competence of campaigning.
00:31:09.700 He owns it now.
00:31:11.180 He just owns it.
00:31:14.240 All right.
00:31:17.240 Here's a, here's the funniest image.
00:31:22.020 I wanted to put an image into your mind, okay?
00:31:24.800 So you're all going to imagine this as I describe it.
00:31:27.180 And this comes from Joel Pollack.
00:31:30.200 So this is not my work.
00:31:31.920 This is Joel's.
00:31:33.300 And I'll read a quote.
00:31:35.400 There's a distinct possibility that you could see a scene
00:31:38.540 where Trump is in jail or in prison,
00:31:42.140 wins the election,
00:31:44.120 the chief justice goes to the prison,
00:31:46.780 administers the oath of office through the bars.
00:31:49.820 I added the through the bars part.
00:31:51.620 And Trump pardons himself
00:31:53.380 and walks out of prison.
00:31:55.620 Come on.
00:32:01.720 Come on.
00:32:03.640 Don't you want to see that?
00:32:06.080 I don't want, I don't want Trump to spend a day in jail,
00:32:09.220 obviously.
00:32:10.680 Yeah, I don't really want Biden to spend a day in jail either.
00:32:13.680 But would that be the best,
00:32:19.200 the best third act of any movie?
00:32:23.560 Can you imagine him winning from jail
00:32:26.140 and pardoning himself and just walking out?
00:32:29.720 Just walking out.
00:32:31.740 And can you imagine him walking out in his prison outfit?
00:32:36.080 It would be just so much funnier.
00:32:38.240 So you imagine the chief justice on the other side of the bars,
00:32:40.840 you know, and Trump's in jail.
00:32:43.860 He just takes the oath.
00:32:45.580 And then the chief justice just looks at the guard
00:32:48.260 and the guard is like,
00:32:50.540 and he just puts the key in and lets him out.
00:32:53.220 And then everybody's like,
00:32:55.120 okay, well, I guess you're free.
00:32:57.140 You know, we have to process you.
00:32:58.560 And Trump goes, ah, don't bother.
00:33:00.900 Well, we have to, you know,
00:33:01.780 give you back your clothes or whatever.
00:33:04.000 Ah, I got other clothes.
00:33:05.520 And he just walks like down the hallway
00:33:07.580 and they just open the front door
00:33:10.020 and probably lots of security doors.
00:33:12.400 They just open all the security doors
00:33:14.040 until he gets to the front
00:33:15.080 and he just walks out.
00:33:16.980 He just walks out in his orange,
00:33:18.620 you know, unfair prosecution jumpsuit.
00:33:24.180 It would be the greatest moment
00:33:25.880 in politics and entertainment
00:33:28.880 at the same time.
00:33:30.860 And it would be the best movie
00:33:32.560 anybody ever wrote.
00:33:33.860 And there wouldn't be a movie.
00:33:35.460 Oh, there would be a movie.
00:33:36.580 Now, this, of course,
00:33:39.160 I don't want to wish him into jail
00:33:40.460 because that would require him being in jail
00:33:42.560 and I don't think that's really a risk.
00:33:45.200 All right, let's talk about all the crazy people.
00:33:47.660 Bill Barr did a double mind reading today in the news.
00:33:51.400 So here are the two things
00:33:52.720 that Bill Barr says he knows.
00:33:54.820 He's quite certain that Trump
00:33:56.540 knew he lost the election.
00:33:59.840 That's based on what?
00:34:01.980 He's quite sure that Trump knew
00:34:05.180 in his inner mind, unspoken mind,
00:34:08.920 that he knew.
00:34:11.500 That's based on pillow talk, possibly magic.
00:34:18.600 Magic? Ouija boards?
00:34:21.200 Mind reading. Mind reading, yes.
00:34:23.400 So that's mind reading.
00:34:24.980 But does he have any other mind reading?
00:34:26.880 Well, it turns out he has an opinion
00:34:28.380 about the prosecutor, Jack Smith,
00:34:30.740 who Bill Barr believes that Jack Smith
00:34:32.700 is really an unbiased prosecutor.
00:34:37.360 How does he know that?
00:34:38.820 How does he know that in this case,
00:34:40.740 specifically, Jack Smith is unbiased?
00:34:43.200 How does he know that?
00:34:44.980 Is it the Ouija board again?
00:34:47.880 Is he reading entrails,
00:34:51.360 telepathy, mind reading?
00:34:54.720 It's mind reading, right?
00:34:55.720 So he managed to put two mind reading statements
00:34:59.460 into one story that CNN ran
00:35:02.860 without fact-checking that people can't read minds.
00:35:07.040 Now, of course, it was an opinion.
00:35:09.360 But it's an opinion about what somebody else
00:35:11.820 is thinking in their private mind.
00:35:14.840 How many of you believe that Trump
00:35:16.780 privately believes he lost the election?
00:35:19.780 Privately.
00:35:20.660 His own mind.
00:35:22.040 How many believe that's true?
00:35:23.160 Now, also, it seemed to me
00:35:27.840 that Bill Barr was playing with language.
00:35:31.960 Because when he says he believes
00:35:33.480 Trump knew he lost,
00:35:35.940 lost,
00:35:37.620 lost.
00:35:39.100 Can you define lost?
00:35:41.660 Because he did lose.
00:35:43.520 I endorse Bill Barr's statement
00:35:45.440 that Trump knows he lost
00:35:48.440 because the election was certified
00:35:51.720 and he was not the president.
00:35:54.240 Therefore, Trump knows
00:35:55.380 he lost.
00:35:58.080 Does Trump know that he can't reverse it?
00:36:01.300 How would you know?
00:36:02.520 Does Trump know that
00:36:03.640 the result was legitimate?
00:36:06.900 Well, that wasn't what
00:36:08.260 Bill Barr said.
00:36:10.080 He said that he do,
00:36:11.800 that Trump knows he lost.
00:36:13.460 But don't we all know that?
00:36:14.840 Doesn't everybody know
00:36:16.540 that the result was certified?
00:36:18.760 That's called losing.
00:36:20.600 Right?
00:36:21.280 The secondary question
00:36:22.800 is whether it was
00:36:23.900 a legitimate result.
00:36:26.500 What does Bill Barr
00:36:27.600 think about that?
00:36:28.480 Well, he didn't say that
00:36:29.320 specifically.
00:36:30.800 But that's a double mind reading
00:36:32.500 for Bill Barr.
00:36:33.440 His credibility
00:36:34.160 is pretty low at the moment.
00:36:36.660 In my mind,
00:36:37.760 his credibility
00:36:38.340 went down with that.
00:36:39.420 To me,
00:36:40.100 that just looks like
00:36:40.920 Bill Barr having
00:36:41.860 some bias.
00:36:43.780 But I'm no mind reader.
00:36:45.320 So, I don't know.
00:36:48.000 Here's the most fun part
00:36:49.500 about the potential
00:36:50.540 for the Trump trial
00:36:52.560 over his 2020
00:36:53.700 election claims.
00:36:56.560 I need a fact check
00:36:57.860 on this,
00:36:58.360 but it's my understanding
00:36:59.360 that Trump's attorneys
00:37:01.440 will put the election
00:37:02.680 itself on trial
00:37:03.760 as part of the defense.
00:37:06.420 Am I right about that?
00:37:07.660 I saw some claims
00:37:10.260 of that,
00:37:11.300 but I wasn't positive
00:37:13.000 that would all be allowed
00:37:14.060 or whatever.
00:37:15.600 So, suppose that happens.
00:37:19.120 What do you think
00:37:19.980 is going to happen
00:37:20.600 if he puts the election
00:37:23.300 on trial?
00:37:24.600 Keep in mind
00:37:25.460 that the courts
00:37:27.000 have made a bunch
00:37:28.200 of rulings
00:37:28.640 on various things,
00:37:29.960 but often their rulings
00:37:31.360 were of the nature
00:37:32.340 that we don't have
00:37:34.400 standing to decide
00:37:35.740 or that it was too late
00:37:37.860 or that they didn't
00:37:39.400 have enough proven votes
00:37:41.180 that it would have
00:37:41.620 changed the election.
00:37:43.000 So, it's never really
00:37:44.240 been, you know,
00:37:45.960 adjudicated as a whole.
00:37:48.140 They've just been able
00:37:49.380 to poke a little
00:37:50.360 pinpricks here and there
00:37:51.480 that have been adjudicated.
00:37:52.580 So, I love saying
00:37:55.040 adjudicated.
00:37:56.440 Did everybody think
00:37:57.380 I was a little bit smarter
00:37:58.380 when I used that word?
00:37:59.860 You're like, whoa.
00:38:01.280 You said adjudicated.
00:38:03.040 Whoa.
00:38:04.480 Big word.
00:38:05.500 It's part of the zeitgeist.
00:38:08.680 I just like to say that too.
00:38:11.080 All right.
00:38:11.340 What about that
00:38:16.860 Trump judge?
00:38:19.120 What about that
00:38:20.000 Trump judge?
00:38:21.020 Well, what do we know
00:38:21.720 about the Trump judge?
00:38:22.900 Obama appointee
00:38:24.100 doesn't necessarily
00:38:26.020 make the judge biased
00:38:28.180 because, you know,
00:38:29.980 they're Trump appointees
00:38:31.060 and you don't assume
00:38:31.800 that they're all criminals
00:38:32.680 or anything.
00:38:34.140 Let's see.
00:38:34.740 What else do we know
00:38:35.340 about that?
00:38:35.840 The judge
00:38:37.000 that's going to work
00:38:39.100 on the Trump case
00:38:40.100 worked where?
00:38:41.960 Oh, at the same law firm
00:38:43.580 as Hunter Biden.
00:38:46.900 Doesn't it feel like
00:38:47.940 that couldn't possibly be true?
00:38:50.100 But I think it is.
00:38:52.080 That the judge
00:38:53.080 actually worked
00:38:53.900 at the same place
00:38:55.440 as Hunter Biden.
00:38:57.160 Now, I don't know
00:38:58.060 if they knew each other.
00:39:00.580 That would be a problem.
00:39:03.240 All right.
00:39:04.980 So, here's my take
00:39:06.840 on how
00:39:07.960 a trial with Trump
00:39:11.200 in which the 2020 election
00:39:13.060 is put on trial
00:39:13.880 could go.
00:39:16.100 How many of you think
00:39:17.340 that you could get
00:39:18.600 12 jurors
00:39:19.760 to agree
00:39:21.740 with the prosecution
00:39:22.840 that they know
00:39:24.560 for sure
00:39:25.100 that the election
00:39:25.960 was fair?
00:39:28.740 Do you think
00:39:29.080 you could get
00:39:29.480 12 jurors in D.C.?
00:39:30.820 Oh, we'll talk about D.C.
00:39:31.900 Hold on.
00:39:32.980 Yeah, we'll talk about
00:39:33.600 the jury pool in D.C.
00:39:36.000 You don't need
00:39:37.100 to prompt me.
00:39:38.220 We're getting there.
00:39:39.080 It's a big topic
00:39:39.940 coming up.
00:39:42.980 But
00:39:43.420 I believe
00:39:45.580 that I could convince
00:39:46.580 all 12 jurors
00:39:47.880 that the election
00:39:49.680 was suspect
00:39:50.420 and I could do it
00:39:51.860 in five minutes.
00:39:53.580 Would you like me
00:39:54.500 to do it to you
00:39:55.300 to show you
00:39:57.120 that if I were
00:39:57.660 talking to the jury
00:39:58.500 I could convince
00:39:59.980 all 12 of them
00:40:00.920 all 12 of them
00:40:02.400 that they don't know
00:40:03.620 if the election
00:40:04.160 was fair?
00:40:04.640 Now, I'm not
00:40:06.060 trying to convince
00:40:06.760 them it was unfair.
00:40:08.180 Right?
00:40:08.400 I don't need to do that.
00:40:10.000 I only need to convince
00:40:11.060 them that any certainty
00:40:13.020 they have about it
00:40:13.940 being fair
00:40:14.460 is unwarranted.
00:40:16.020 Okay?
00:40:16.980 And that should be enough.
00:40:19.220 So,
00:40:20.040 given that the most
00:40:21.220 entertaining
00:40:21.700 and therefore
00:40:22.380 some would say
00:40:23.100 the most likely
00:40:23.760 outcome
00:40:24.240 is that that trial
00:40:26.060 will be put on
00:40:26.820 or that the elections
00:40:27.960 themselves
00:40:28.640 will be put on trial,
00:40:30.660 here's what
00:40:31.300 I would argue
00:40:32.840 if I were
00:40:33.660 Trump's attorney.
00:40:35.260 Some have said
00:40:36.200 that Trump owes me
00:40:37.240 half a million dollars
00:40:38.260 in attorney fees
00:40:39.200 for this excellent summary.
00:40:41.700 But imagine me now
00:40:42.640 talking to the jury
00:40:43.560 and let's say
00:40:44.420 it's my closing statements.
00:40:46.580 And I'm talking
00:40:47.080 to the jury
00:40:47.600 and I'm trying
00:40:48.160 to support Trump
00:40:49.000 and I'm his lawyer
00:40:50.000 and I make
00:40:52.720 the following argument.
00:40:54.980 Fact.
00:40:56.940 Fact.
00:40:58.420 Any system
00:40:59.080 with lots of participants,
00:41:00.980 complexity,
00:41:01.420 and high stakes
00:41:02.880 will become corrupt
00:41:04.700 over time.
00:41:06.780 Any system
00:41:07.600 with those qualities
00:41:08.980 will become corrupt
00:41:09.840 over time.
00:41:10.780 That is true
00:41:11.560 of every observed
00:41:12.600 human-made system
00:41:13.720 since the beginning
00:41:14.620 of recorded history.
00:41:15.860 The only mystery
00:41:17.140 is when
00:41:18.500 the corruption happens.
00:41:21.260 For example,
00:41:22.320 we know that Congress
00:41:23.100 is influenced
00:41:24.080 by the military-industrial complex.
00:41:27.120 Nobody really questions
00:41:28.200 that anymore.
00:41:29.160 We know that
00:41:29.880 financial markets
00:41:30.660 are increasingly rigged
00:41:32.000 for the benefit
00:41:33.120 of the big players.
00:41:35.080 I don't think
00:41:35.640 anybody questions that.
00:41:38.700 And
00:41:39.060 every complex system
00:41:43.260 that's human-made
00:41:45.060 of high value
00:41:46.300 becomes corrupt
00:41:46.940 over time
00:41:47.480 no matter what
00:41:48.620 kind of controls
00:41:49.400 are in place.
00:41:51.200 So if you think,
00:41:52.040 well,
00:41:52.340 we've got all the controls
00:41:53.440 to stop it,
00:41:54.740 nobody's ever done that.
00:41:56.680 Nobody's ever been able
00:41:57.640 to put enough controls
00:41:58.580 in place
00:41:59.100 in a complex situation
00:42:00.900 where there's high value
00:42:01.940 and lots of participants,
00:42:03.400 et cetera.
00:42:05.120 There's never been
00:42:06.080 an exception.
00:42:07.480 That's because,
00:42:08.560 here's why there's never
00:42:09.420 been an exception to it,
00:42:10.720 because bad actors
00:42:11.980 have an incentive
00:42:12.800 to peck away
00:42:14.200 until they find a hole
00:42:15.460 to crawl through.
00:42:17.320 So if you have a system
00:42:18.300 that has survived
00:42:19.900 all attempts
00:42:20.560 to corrupt it,
00:42:22.000 the attempts
00:42:22.500 aren't going to stop
00:42:23.400 because it's a high-value system,
00:42:25.420 it's complex,
00:42:26.600 people have an incentive,
00:42:27.640 to try to corrupt it.
00:42:29.380 So people are going
00:42:30.260 to pick at it forever
00:42:31.400 until somebody gets lucky
00:42:32.980 and finds a way
00:42:34.440 in through some crack.
00:42:36.360 So you know for sure
00:42:37.700 that it will be corrupted,
00:42:39.440 you just don't know when.
00:42:41.080 You can guarantee it
00:42:42.100 by design.
00:42:43.060 Remember,
00:42:44.000 design is destiny.
00:42:45.720 It's designed
00:42:46.500 to be corrupted.
00:42:48.140 If we designed it
00:42:49.660 to not be corrupted,
00:42:50.700 it would look different.
00:42:52.180 You know,
00:42:52.360 it would be
00:42:52.780 paint on your finger,
00:42:54.580 one written ballot,
00:42:55.940 you know,
00:42:56.340 it would be easy
00:42:56.800 to design a system.
00:42:58.280 They had no questions.
00:43:00.160 But we didn't.
00:43:01.220 We designed a system
00:43:02.200 that's guaranteed
00:43:02.900 to have corruption.
00:43:05.060 We just don't know when.
00:43:07.160 All right.
00:43:10.000 Our elections
00:43:10.760 are not fully auditable.
00:43:12.500 We don't see
00:43:13.060 the computer code
00:43:14.060 for the machines.
00:43:15.140 We don't know
00:43:15.820 if mail-in ballots
00:43:16.760 were discarded
00:43:17.640 before reaching
00:43:18.420 the drop box.
00:43:19.760 We don't know
00:43:20.340 if any bad actors
00:43:21.340 hacked any part of it.
00:43:22.360 And we certainly
00:43:23.300 don't know
00:43:23.940 if there are
00:43:25.100 innovative ways
00:43:25.920 to rig an election
00:43:26.780 that have not yet
00:43:28.420 been discovered.
00:43:31.220 Do you think
00:43:32.300 we've thought
00:43:33.120 of all the ways
00:43:33.720 it could be done?
00:43:35.520 Probably not.
00:43:37.320 Criminals are pretty clever
00:43:38.420 because remember,
00:43:39.460 they can just
00:43:40.140 keep pecking at it
00:43:41.220 until somebody
00:43:42.040 gets lucky
00:43:42.580 and finds a way in.
00:43:44.980 All right.
00:43:46.560 So we can't know
00:43:47.520 for sure
00:43:47.860 if any particular election,
00:43:49.360 such as 2020,
00:43:50.420 was rigged,
00:43:51.020 but we can know
00:43:51.920 for sure
00:43:52.220 the current design
00:43:52.980 of our election system
00:43:53.860 guarantees rigging
00:43:55.000 at some point.
00:43:56.400 And we can know
00:43:57.020 for sure
00:43:57.360 that the voting results
00:43:58.440 for 2020
00:43:59.580 violated historical patterns
00:44:02.800 so drastically
00:44:04.560 that any reasonable person
00:44:06.860 would have some questions.
00:44:09.160 Now,
00:44:09.720 there are explanations
00:44:10.840 for why the patterns
00:44:11.840 were what they were,
00:44:13.100 something about the changes
00:44:14.700 in the laws of voting
00:44:16.400 and the pandemic,
00:44:17.480 et cetera,
00:44:17.980 but certainly the jury
00:44:19.720 would have some questions
00:44:20.560 because by then
00:44:22.560 they would have shown
00:44:23.500 that there were patterns
00:44:24.600 being violated.
00:44:25.680 The jury would know that
00:44:26.820 by the time they got
00:44:27.480 to the closing arguments.
00:44:28.820 All right.
00:44:29.420 Now,
00:44:29.760 a reasonable person
00:44:30.580 can believe the 2020 election
00:44:31.960 was fair.
00:44:33.280 Now,
00:44:33.680 this is called pacing.
00:44:35.340 So you allow
00:44:36.460 that their point of view
00:44:37.480 if it's different for yours
00:44:38.780 could still be reasonable.
00:44:40.820 Say,
00:44:41.180 a reasonable person
00:44:41.980 can believe the 2020 election
00:44:43.340 was fair,
00:44:44.280 but ask yourself,
00:44:45.860 how much of your opinion
00:44:47.080 is influenced
00:44:47.820 by your patriotism
00:44:49.120 and wishful thinking
00:44:50.840 about how things should be.
00:44:53.420 Trusting an American election
00:44:54.820 requires trust
00:44:56.760 in the party
00:44:57.380 that brought you
00:44:58.020 the Russia collusion hoax,
00:44:59.880 the Hunter laptop hoax,
00:45:01.580 and about 20 others.
00:45:04.100 They could be listening
00:45:05.080 if you wanted to.
00:45:06.360 With that cast of characters
00:45:08.340 who did all those hoaxes,
00:45:10.740 do you think they would hesitate
00:45:11.760 to rig an election
00:45:12.660 if they could get away with it?
00:45:13.960 If they could get away with it.
00:45:16.580 That cast of characters.
00:45:18.780 And,
00:45:19.420 remember,
00:45:20.780 no one was arrested
00:45:22.080 for any of the hoaxes
00:45:25.060 I just mentioned.
00:45:26.080 There are no,
00:45:27.300 well,
00:45:27.600 actually,
00:45:27.900 I guess one guy
00:45:28.480 got arrested
00:45:30.120 and,
00:45:31.720 you know,
00:45:32.100 he's still practicing law.
00:45:33.640 So basically,
00:45:34.560 you get away with it
00:45:35.400 if you do hoaxes
00:45:37.120 of these nature,
00:45:39.060 of that nature.
00:45:40.600 All right.
00:45:41.120 So here's my closer.
00:45:42.380 President Trump
00:45:42.960 has lived in the real world
00:45:44.400 of business and politics
00:45:45.580 for longer than most of you
00:45:47.560 have been alive.
00:45:49.320 He knows how the real world works.
00:45:51.880 He has seen it from the inside.
00:45:53.680 His instincts told him
00:45:55.000 the election was gamed
00:45:56.280 in some way.
00:45:58.140 How much of your own money
00:45:59.560 would you bet
00:46:00.620 that Mr. Trump's instincts
00:46:02.320 about the election
00:46:03.240 are wrong?
00:46:05.540 Your own money.
00:46:06.560 How much would you bet
00:46:07.440 that he's wrong?
00:46:09.180 He's got decades of experience
00:46:11.080 of looking at sketchy situations.
00:46:14.540 Would you bet against him?
00:46:16.660 Again,
00:46:17.060 knowing that the system
00:46:17.960 he's blaming
00:46:18.760 is designed
00:46:20.320 to be corrupt
00:46:21.440 eventually.
00:46:22.500 We just don't know
00:46:23.180 if he's right about it now.
00:46:24.840 But would you bet against him?
00:46:27.880 And
00:46:28.320 in order to find
00:46:31.220 Mr. Trump guilty,
00:46:32.560 you have to
00:46:33.040 you have to bet
00:46:33.960 against his experience
00:46:35.360 in spotting
00:46:36.020 sketchy behavior.
00:46:36.860 And you have to believe
00:46:38.380 all 50 states
00:46:39.520 ran clean elections
00:46:40.760 in the context
00:46:42.640 of no other complex
00:46:45.140 human-made system
00:46:46.800 of high value
00:46:47.700 ever being entirely clean.
00:46:51.840 That's what you have to believe.
00:46:55.440 Now,
00:46:57.320 you know,
00:46:58.360 if I did the short version,
00:46:59.700 I'd deliver it in five minutes.
00:47:01.640 How many believe
00:47:02.500 that in five minutes
00:47:03.460 I could guarantee
00:47:04.300 you don't get 12 jurors
00:47:05.760 to believe
00:47:06.740 that the election
00:47:07.320 was fair?
00:47:08.560 For sure.
00:47:16.600 Here's the mind reader.
00:47:18.400 Kiss the sky says,
00:47:19.920 Scott isn't as smart
00:47:21.020 as he thinks.
00:47:22.920 What exactly do I think?
00:47:24.800 In my inner thoughts,
00:47:26.800 please tell me
00:47:27.480 what I'm thinking
00:47:28.140 about my own intelligence.
00:47:30.440 Because that was a real
00:47:31.280 insightful comment there.
00:47:33.700 Goodbye.
00:47:35.760 All right.
00:47:38.420 So now you're saying to me,
00:47:40.240 but Scott,
00:47:41.780 you're forgetting
00:47:42.540 it's a D.C.
00:47:43.820 it's a D.C. jury, right?
00:47:46.220 Let's talk about that.
00:47:48.400 Well,
00:47:49.240 is the D.C. jury pool biased?
00:47:53.200 Well,
00:47:53.640 you don't have to worry about it
00:47:54.860 because a senior legal affairs
00:47:56.340 reporter for Politico
00:47:57.500 who has a focus
00:47:59.620 on the January 6th aftermath.
00:48:01.880 So it's somebody
00:48:03.360 who writes for Politico
00:48:04.460 and is really focused
00:48:06.920 on the January 6th,
00:48:08.580 I believe he'd call it
00:48:09.720 an insurrection.
00:48:11.060 So you've got a real
00:48:11.740 unbiased source here.
00:48:13.360 And it's Kyle Cheney.
00:48:15.000 And here's Kyle explaining
00:48:16.940 that you shouldn't worry
00:48:17.760 about the D.C. juries.
00:48:19.860 Now,
00:48:20.260 before your heads explode,
00:48:22.740 I'm going to debunk him
00:48:24.540 when we're done.
00:48:25.080 So don't worry
00:48:27.320 that I believe
00:48:28.060 what his argument is,
00:48:29.700 all right?
00:48:30.200 Because you're going to go nuts
00:48:31.260 if you think I believe him.
00:48:32.840 Okay?
00:48:33.540 I'll just tell you
00:48:34.580 what he said.
00:48:36.320 He said,
00:48:37.120 the trope about D.C. juries,
00:48:38.960 in quotes,
00:48:39.500 the D.C. juries,
00:48:40.660 has not really played out
00:48:42.120 in practice.
00:48:43.380 In the two most high-profile
00:48:45.220 January 6th cases so far,
00:48:47.360 juries have acquitted
00:48:48.300 on some of the most serious charges
00:48:50.140 and delivered nuanced verdicts.
00:48:53.000 Jurors are selected
00:48:55.120 after extensive questioning
00:48:56.720 by lawyers and judges
00:48:58.060 that include extensive review
00:49:00.220 of political leanings
00:49:01.380 and direct impacts
00:49:02.840 of January 6th.
00:49:04.540 Only after that process,
00:49:07.540 if judges and lawyers
00:49:08.880 think they are unable
00:49:10.520 to seat an impartial jury,
00:49:12.660 is motion to change venue
00:49:14.340 in order.
00:49:16.160 Jury systems in the U.S.
00:49:17.440 are premised on juries
00:49:19.000 being willing to set aside
00:49:20.500 personal views
00:49:21.580 and judge based on evidence.
00:49:24.540 If you don't believe
00:49:25.760 that is possible
00:49:26.800 and that most people
00:49:28.520 won't jail an innocent person
00:49:30.280 just because they have
00:49:31.220 different views,
00:49:32.340 that's a critique
00:49:33.460 of the entire system, people.
00:49:35.900 That would be a critique
00:49:36.940 of the entire system.
00:49:38.660 Because you know
00:49:39.520 people take it seriously.
00:49:41.600 All right?
00:49:42.520 So that's his point.
00:49:44.160 Pretty good argument, right?
00:49:45.200 It's a strong argument.
00:49:48.500 He's saying that history shows
00:49:50.020 that they're not just all voting
00:49:52.700 in one direction.
00:49:54.140 He says the process guarantees
00:49:55.860 you can talk to them individually
00:49:57.440 and find out what their bias is.
00:49:59.760 So that should be fine.
00:50:01.260 Everybody good with that?
00:50:02.940 D.C. juries?
00:50:04.140 No problem.
00:50:05.800 Right?
00:50:07.120 Well, I tweeted back
00:50:08.340 at Kyle Cheney
00:50:11.500 after reading his tweet
00:50:12.740 and I said this.
00:50:14.960 Now imagine
00:50:15.540 every potential juror
00:50:17.020 has been brainwashed
00:50:18.120 to believe the defendant
00:50:19.260 is literally Hitler-like.
00:50:23.620 Now put me
00:50:24.600 in the jury pool.
00:50:26.260 I will lie
00:50:27.020 to your dumb ass
00:50:28.160 all day long
00:50:28.920 to get on that jury
00:50:29.800 and take Hitler
00:50:30.460 off the field.
00:50:31.760 I hope you would too, Kyle.
00:50:34.060 None of the normal rules
00:50:35.400 apply to Trump.
00:50:38.160 Hello.
00:50:39.380 Wouldn't you like me
00:50:40.040 to be your lawyer?
00:50:43.060 Nothing that Kyle said
00:50:45.560 about D.C. jury pools,
00:50:47.820 which, by the way,
00:50:49.160 I do believe
00:50:49.960 Kyle's argument.
00:50:52.080 I do believe
00:50:52.980 that for the ordinary crime,
00:50:55.600 you know,
00:50:55.800 somebody stole something,
00:50:57.140 or even January 6th,
00:50:58.540 if you're talking
00:50:59.040 about the protesters.
00:51:00.320 I believe that even
00:51:01.720 a Democrat
00:51:03.660 on the jury
00:51:05.720 would look at
00:51:06.820 a Republican protester
00:51:08.160 and say some version of,
00:51:10.260 well, that's just
00:51:10.740 a citizen, right?
00:51:13.520 That could have been me
00:51:14.680 and might have been me
00:51:16.580 if the results
00:51:17.220 had been the other way.
00:51:18.480 So it's easy
00:51:19.520 for me to believe
00:51:20.220 that a Democrat citizen
00:51:22.040 would find
00:51:23.300 a Republican citizen
00:51:24.660 not guilty,
00:51:26.360 even when there's
00:51:27.400 a political ramification.
00:51:29.020 I can see that.
00:51:29.800 I do think that the jury,
00:51:31.120 I do think our legal system
00:51:32.600 is at least that good.
00:51:33.980 But that doesn't
00:51:36.580 apply to Trump.
00:51:38.620 After, what,
00:51:39.900 six years of the media
00:51:41.440 telling you that
00:51:42.540 he's literally the devil
00:51:44.460 and he's, you know,
00:51:45.680 Hitler incarnate,
00:51:47.860 what juror
00:51:48.980 is going to ignore that?
00:51:51.660 Right?
00:51:52.020 So there's nothing normal
00:51:53.520 about Trump in a jury.
00:51:56.220 So I would argue
00:51:58.000 that Kyle is right
00:51:59.380 for just about
00:52:00.720 every defendant
00:52:01.540 except Trump,
00:52:02.500 and in this case
00:52:03.680 he would be as wrong
00:52:04.460 as you could possibly be
00:52:05.660 because Hitler
00:52:06.800 does not get a fair trial
00:52:08.380 anywhere.
00:52:11.260 And you would argue
00:52:12.480 that that's right.
00:52:14.360 I mean, I just said
00:52:15.180 I would lie
00:52:16.240 to get on the jury pool
00:52:17.300 or I would lie
00:52:18.340 to get on the jury.
00:52:19.760 And I would.
00:52:20.840 I promise you,
00:52:21.940 I take an oath
00:52:22.700 that if Hitler
00:52:24.240 or a Hitler-like character
00:52:26.200 is ever,
00:52:26.700 is ever,
00:52:28.000 you know,
00:52:28.800 on the stand,
00:52:30.240 I will lie
00:52:31.600 to get on the jury
00:52:32.400 if I have to
00:52:33.060 just to get rid of them.
00:52:35.280 I wouldn't care
00:52:35.980 what the legal system
00:52:36.840 told me I had to do
00:52:37.800 at all.
00:52:39.360 It wouldn't even be a factor.
00:52:41.260 I would just say
00:52:42.040 what is right,
00:52:42.780 what is wrong,
00:52:43.860 what could kill me,
00:52:44.820 what could keep me alive,
00:52:46.460 what could kill my family,
00:52:47.680 what could keep them alive,
00:52:48.760 and then I would act on that.
00:52:50.440 But I definitely
00:52:51.200 wouldn't be acting on the law.
00:52:53.420 I promise you,
00:52:54.520 I would ignore the law completely.
00:52:56.820 And if somebody asked me
00:52:57.840 how I did it,
00:52:58.420 I'd say,
00:52:58.720 oh, I looked at the facts.
00:53:00.480 Oh yeah,
00:53:01.040 after the fact,
00:53:01.740 I'd say,
00:53:01.940 oh, I looked at all those facts.
00:53:03.780 I'm sure all those facts
00:53:04.940 were totally convincing me.
00:53:07.520 That's what I'd say.
00:53:08.620 I would lie through my ass.
00:53:11.460 Every one of you would.
00:53:13.040 I hope.
00:53:14.180 If you're good people,
00:53:15.120 you would lie too
00:53:15.820 in that situation.
00:53:18.280 That's my feeling.
00:53:20.760 All right,
00:53:21.280 well,
00:53:21.780 here's the funniest thing
00:53:22.800 I read about it,
00:53:23.480 and this is from
00:53:24.280 Twitter user
00:53:25.880 Deplorable Greenie,
00:53:28.260 Rob Macho.
00:53:29.700 And he suggested
00:53:31.100 a strategy
00:53:31.800 for Trump's attorneys.
00:53:34.200 He says the defense
00:53:35.340 could call
00:53:36.020 81 million witnesses
00:53:37.620 to the stand
00:53:38.420 and watch about
00:53:39.880 65 million show up.
00:53:43.100 Okay,
00:53:43.860 that's pretty funny.
00:53:46.880 That is really funny.
00:53:49.060 Invite 81 million
00:53:50.220 and watch
00:53:51.100 when only 65 million
00:53:52.420 show up.
00:53:54.920 That's a good joke.
00:53:57.220 Good joke.
00:53:58.140 All right.
00:54:01.360 Matt Gaetz
00:54:02.100 has a plan
00:54:02.760 that looks pretty
00:54:03.480 interesting
00:54:03.900 to make sure
00:54:06.480 that we're
00:54:06.940 doing the right thing
00:54:08.020 with this
00:54:08.380 Jack Smith
00:54:08.980 prosecutor
00:54:09.620 and Trump.
00:54:10.520 He's got a four-point plan.
00:54:11.920 He says demand
00:54:12.540 that Jack Smith,
00:54:13.640 the prosecutor,
00:54:14.580 present himself
00:54:15.280 before the House
00:54:16.040 Judiciary Committee
00:54:17.000 for a transcribed
00:54:18.540 interview in the next
00:54:19.420 15 days.
00:54:20.200 In other words,
00:54:20.800 get him under
00:54:21.420 the oath
00:54:21.780 and make him
00:54:22.980 talk about this
00:54:23.780 thing,
00:54:24.540 transparency.
00:54:25.180 If he does not,
00:54:26.680 point two,
00:54:27.600 we should send
00:54:28.180 a subpoena.
00:54:28.860 If he ignores
00:54:29.440 a subpoena,
00:54:30.720 you know,
00:54:31.040 blah, blah,
00:54:31.640 do what you do
00:54:32.400 when people
00:54:33.180 ignore subpoenas.
00:54:34.320 And then number
00:54:34.800 four,
00:54:36.260 Merrick Garland,
00:54:37.320 Attorney General,
00:54:38.600 if he doesn't
00:54:39.620 enforce the
00:54:40.580 criminal contempt
00:54:41.480 charges,
00:54:42.460 in other words,
00:54:42.980 if Jack Smith
00:54:43.620 doesn't show up
00:54:44.720 and answer the
00:54:45.300 questions,
00:54:46.300 then we ought
00:54:47.140 to impeach him.
00:54:48.820 Well,
00:54:49.700 I don't know.
00:54:50.480 This feels a little
00:54:51.300 bit toothless.
00:54:53.640 Do you think,
00:54:55.260 because I don't
00:54:55.740 know what would
00:54:56.200 be the point
00:54:56.980 of asking him
00:54:58.100 to talk in public.
00:54:59.400 It would just
00:55:00.020 be political,
00:55:00.700 right?
00:55:01.700 The point of it
00:55:02.540 would be to
00:55:03.100 embarrass him
00:55:03.940 by making it
00:55:04.580 look like it's
00:55:05.100 a political
00:55:05.600 prosecution,
00:55:07.540 something like
00:55:08.020 that.
00:55:09.300 I don't know.
00:55:09.860 I feel like he
00:55:10.540 could just show up
00:55:11.240 and do a
00:55:11.600 Christopher Wray.
00:55:13.060 Couldn't he?
00:55:16.660 You know,
00:55:17.380 Jack Smith,
00:55:18.260 can you tell us
00:55:19.180 why you did
00:55:20.240 X?
00:55:22.020 Yeah,
00:55:22.500 I can't talk
00:55:23.240 about that
00:55:23.700 because the
00:55:24.200 investigation is
00:55:24.980 ongoing.
00:55:26.300 All right,
00:55:26.800 well,
00:55:27.220 well,
00:55:28.060 can you tell us
00:55:28.860 about why?
00:55:31.540 I can look into
00:55:32.480 that.
00:55:32.980 I don't have the
00:55:33.640 notes with me,
00:55:34.280 but I'd be happy
00:55:35.040 to look into that
00:55:35.720 and get back to
00:55:36.200 you.
00:55:37.540 All right,
00:55:38.100 well,
00:55:38.480 how about Z?
00:55:40.060 Can you tell us
00:55:40.560 about Z?
00:55:43.340 I don't have that
00:55:44.380 information.
00:55:45.040 It's an ongoing
00:55:45.620 process.
00:55:46.480 I can get that
00:55:47.320 information,
00:55:47.980 but not now
00:55:48.640 because there's a
00:55:49.580 current investigation
00:55:50.960 underway.
00:55:53.200 I don't know.
00:55:53.780 I feel like that
00:55:55.700 would be a dead
00:55:56.240 end,
00:55:58.360 but I'm also
00:55:59.240 going to give
00:56:01.340 Matt Gates
00:56:02.320 credit
00:56:02.760 because he did
00:56:04.060 something.
00:56:05.600 Right?
00:56:05.820 He did
00:56:06.180 something.
00:56:07.380 So that's,
00:56:08.660 you know,
00:56:08.900 I'm going to give
00:56:09.400 him the A for
00:56:10.400 doing something.
00:56:11.960 Maybe you get
00:56:12.420 lucky.
00:56:13.420 You know,
00:56:13.620 maybe Jack Smith
00:56:14.480 says something we
00:56:15.300 didn't know.
00:56:16.360 Maybe.
00:56:16.700 I mean,
00:56:18.140 it's pretty much
00:56:18.760 a long shot.
00:56:19.720 Probably a waste
00:56:20.220 of time.
00:56:21.240 But at least
00:56:21.620 it's something.
00:56:23.020 That's not
00:56:23.580 nothing.
00:56:24.740 All right,
00:56:25.260 here's an
00:56:25.560 interesting thing.
00:56:26.300 DeSantis is
00:56:26.980 doing so poorly
00:56:27.760 campaigning that
00:56:28.560 he agreed to
00:56:29.200 debate Newsom.
00:56:30.820 What do you
00:56:31.340 think of that?
00:56:32.320 He agreed to
00:56:33.260 debate Newsom.
00:56:34.840 Now,
00:56:35.120 that's a Hail Mary.
00:56:37.200 That is a Hail Mary.
00:56:40.560 But he might be
00:56:41.620 smart.
00:56:42.940 This could turn
00:56:43.960 out to be a
00:56:45.120 good play.
00:56:45.700 Here's my
00:56:46.060 thinking.
00:56:47.360 As things
00:56:48.100 stand,
00:56:49.980 it doesn't
00:56:51.080 look like
00:56:51.480 DeSantis will
00:56:52.200 be the
00:56:52.800 candidate.
00:56:53.940 As things
00:56:54.520 stand.
00:56:55.220 Even if
00:56:55.720 Trump is
00:56:56.260 in jail.
00:56:57.580 I've got a
00:56:58.260 feeling he's
00:56:58.700 still going to
00:56:59.040 be the
00:56:59.260 candidate.
00:57:00.380 So,
00:57:01.380 DeSantis has
00:57:02.060 to do
00:57:02.480 something.
00:57:03.780 Right?
00:57:03.900 He's going to
00:57:04.240 have to get
00:57:05.660 out of his
00:57:06.040 little box of
00:57:06.840 talking like a
00:57:07.760 corporate guy
00:57:08.420 and just do
00:57:09.140 something.
00:57:10.380 Yeah,
00:57:10.660 and Vivek is
00:57:11.320 making him
00:57:12.060 look like a
00:57:12.660 non-corpore.
00:57:13.960 competitor at
00:57:14.600 this point.
00:57:15.880 So,
00:57:16.620 I guess Newsom
00:57:17.620 had said he
00:57:18.440 would do it
00:57:18.980 and DeSantis
00:57:19.520 now says he
00:57:20.380 agrees.
00:57:21.000 Who knows if
00:57:21.500 it will really
00:57:21.860 happen.
00:57:22.400 I suspect it
00:57:23.060 will because
00:57:23.500 it would be
00:57:23.820 so entertaining.
00:57:25.040 Somebody would
00:57:25.580 want to host
00:57:26.220 it.
00:57:27.160 And,
00:57:28.400 how do you
00:57:31.340 think he
00:57:31.640 would do?
00:57:33.220 So,
00:57:33.740 here's my
00:57:34.100 take.
00:57:34.500 If this were
00:57:35.040 a general
00:57:35.520 election,
00:57:37.000 I would be
00:57:37.640 worried for
00:57:38.380 DeSantis
00:57:38.900 against Newsom
00:57:40.000 because Newsom's
00:57:41.120 not bad
00:57:41.860 on stage.
00:57:43.960 Would you
00:57:44.760 agree?
00:57:46.020 You know,
00:57:47.040 he's a
00:57:47.360 governor for
00:57:47.840 a reason.
00:57:49.400 He's a
00:57:50.060 governor because
00:57:50.640 he's good at
00:57:51.300 this,
00:57:52.280 this exact
00:57:53.320 thing he's
00:57:53.900 good at.
00:57:55.160 So,
00:57:56.740 DeSantis is
00:57:57.440 probably good
00:57:58.140 too,
00:57:59.200 and I think
00:57:59.940 that DeSantis
00:58:00.600 is correctly
00:58:01.680 playing this
00:58:03.180 because if
00:58:04.700 any Democrat
00:58:06.360 has a debate
00:58:07.880 with any
00:58:08.580 Republican,
00:58:09.080 what do the
00:58:09.820 Republicans say
00:58:10.560 when it's
00:58:10.900 over?
00:58:11.140 you know.
00:58:14.700 Any
00:58:14.980 Republican
00:58:15.540 debates any
00:58:17.000 Democrat and
00:58:17.920 then when it's
00:58:18.360 over,
00:58:18.740 what do the
00:58:19.180 Republicans say?
00:58:20.640 The Republicans
00:58:21.220 say that
00:58:21.720 Republican,
00:58:22.440 whoever he
00:58:22.820 was,
00:58:23.640 won that so
00:58:24.840 easily.
00:58:26.640 That's my
00:58:27.220 guy,
00:58:28.060 right?
00:58:29.160 So,
00:58:30.720 if DeSantis,
00:58:33.020 this is actually
00:58:33.660 a clever play
00:58:34.480 because you can
00:58:35.840 count on your
00:58:36.760 base saying
00:58:37.620 you won even
00:58:38.400 if you lost,
00:58:40.280 right?
00:58:40.940 And you can
00:58:41.620 count on them
00:58:42.220 ignoring CNN
00:58:43.100 if CNN says
00:58:44.300 that Newsom
00:58:44.980 won.
00:58:46.180 And MSNBC,
00:58:47.280 of course they
00:58:47.800 would,
00:58:48.420 they would say
00:58:48.860 Newsom won.
00:58:50.040 But his base
00:58:50.980 wouldn't care
00:58:52.160 about any of
00:58:52.620 that.
00:58:53.080 They would
00:58:53.440 just say,
00:58:54.060 oh,
00:58:54.420 he said
00:58:54.840 things I
00:58:55.300 agree with,
00:58:56.220 therefore he
00:58:56.720 won.
00:58:57.680 So,
00:58:58.240 in the context
00:58:58.780 of the
00:58:59.080 primaries,
00:59:00.220 it's probably
00:59:00.840 really smart.
00:59:02.780 I'm going to
00:59:03.280 have to give
00:59:03.700 him,
00:59:04.200 I'm going to
00:59:05.960 have to give
00:59:06.280 him an A for
00:59:06.840 this.
00:59:08.020 I'm going to
00:59:08.300 have to give
00:59:08.700 DeSantis his
00:59:09.440 first A for
00:59:10.780 campaigning.
00:59:11.900 I think he's
00:59:12.300 very solid as
00:59:13.060 a governor.
00:59:14.040 But for
00:59:14.420 campaigning,
00:59:15.100 he's faltered
00:59:15.780 a little bit,
00:59:16.320 he just hasn't
00:59:16.800 been interesting.
00:59:17.700 But this is
00:59:18.280 both interesting,
00:59:19.780 it's very
00:59:20.200 interesting,
00:59:21.100 and it's the
00:59:21.960 right play
00:59:22.400 because he
00:59:22.780 can't lose.
00:59:24.380 He's got a
00:59:25.140 no-lose
00:59:25.640 proposition.
00:59:27.320 It's kind of
00:59:27.860 Trump-like.
00:59:28.940 You know,
00:59:29.120 you can win
00:59:29.560 two A's.
00:59:30.720 So he wins
00:59:31.420 if Newsom
00:59:31.980 doesn't show
00:59:32.620 up.
00:59:33.760 He wins
00:59:34.620 if Newsom
00:59:35.140 wins.
00:59:36.080 If Newsom
00:59:36.600 shows up
00:59:37.080 and wins
00:59:37.480 the debate,
00:59:39.120 DeSantis'
00:59:39.780 base will
00:59:40.160 never even
00:59:40.560 know that.
00:59:41.500 They'll just
00:59:41.940 say,
00:59:42.240 I watched
00:59:42.720 it too,
00:59:43.100 and I
00:59:43.300 saw him
00:59:43.580 win.
00:59:44.400 Or they'll
00:59:44.960 see the
00:59:45.280 news reports
00:59:45.860 and say,
00:59:46.220 well,
00:59:46.400 the news
00:59:46.700 says DeSantis
00:59:48.700 won.
00:59:48.960 So it's
00:59:51.160 all upside.
00:59:54.320 DeSantis
00:59:54.760 could get up
00:59:55.380 there and
00:59:55.740 drool on
00:59:56.400 stage.
00:59:58.420 Newsom
00:59:58.860 could cream
00:59:59.500 him,
01:00:00.420 and the
01:00:01.080 base would
01:00:01.500 still say
01:00:01.940 DeSantis won
01:00:02.680 easily.
01:00:03.660 So there
01:00:04.240 really isn't a
01:00:05.040 debate risk.
01:00:06.040 I think there
01:00:06.600 would be a
01:00:07.080 debate risk if
01:00:07.740 this were the
01:00:08.220 general election.
01:00:09.640 But since he's
01:00:10.220 just talking to
01:00:10.760 the base,
01:00:12.040 there's no way
01:00:12.680 to lose.
01:00:14.260 And I say
01:00:14.980 no way.
01:00:15.500 I mean,
01:00:16.520 he could say
01:00:17.020 the dumbest
01:00:17.500 thing in the
01:00:17.860 world and
01:00:18.340 lose,
01:00:19.040 but he's a
01:00:20.560 capable,
01:00:21.980 strong player.
01:00:22.740 You'd expect
01:00:23.220 him to do
01:00:23.660 fine.
01:00:26.020 So that's
01:00:27.940 fun.
01:00:29.500 In other
01:00:30.260 news,
01:00:31.200 the so-called
01:00:32.240 George Floyd
01:00:33.060 narrative is
01:00:33.740 taking a hit,
01:00:34.640 the narrative
01:00:35.200 being that the
01:00:36.120 black citizens
01:00:37.120 in Minnesota
01:00:37.860 were being
01:00:38.420 treated differently
01:00:39.980 or worse than
01:00:40.760 the white
01:00:41.280 citizens by
01:00:42.120 the police.
01:00:43.440 But an
01:00:44.000 analysis found
01:00:44.960 the opposite,
01:00:46.080 that police
01:00:47.540 were harder
01:00:48.180 on, and
01:00:48.920 the justice
01:00:49.460 system in
01:00:50.000 general, all
01:00:50.600 the way through
01:00:51.120 from sentencing
01:00:51.920 to incarceration,
01:00:53.460 was harder
01:00:54.060 on white
01:00:54.520 offenders.
01:00:58.220 So everything
01:00:59.260 was opposite.
01:01:01.060 All those
01:01:01.820 riots, all
01:01:03.980 the George
01:01:04.700 Floyd problems,
01:01:05.760 all based on
01:01:06.520 the fact that
01:01:07.080 black people
01:01:07.620 were getting
01:01:08.140 worse treatment
01:01:09.680 by the justice
01:01:10.360 system.
01:01:11.520 It was the
01:01:12.280 opposite.
01:01:12.560 Now, I'm
01:01:15.080 not sure I
01:01:15.540 believe the
01:01:15.940 analysis, so
01:01:17.320 let me say, I
01:01:19.340 don't believe
01:01:19.720 any data about
01:01:20.500 anything, because
01:01:21.920 we live in a
01:01:22.460 world where all
01:01:23.080 data is
01:01:23.500 motivated.
01:01:24.680 There's always
01:01:25.080 somebody who
01:01:25.540 wants it to
01:01:25.960 come out a
01:01:26.480 certain way, and
01:01:27.220 I was surprised
01:01:27.940 it did.
01:01:28.920 So I'm not
01:01:29.700 sure I believe
01:01:30.220 this analysis.
01:01:31.340 What do you
01:01:31.660 think?
01:01:32.840 But what I do
01:01:33.700 believe is we
01:01:34.720 also don't know
01:01:35.520 if it works the
01:01:36.160 other way.
01:01:37.520 I do believe
01:01:38.280 that if you
01:01:38.740 showed me data
01:01:39.360 that was
01:01:39.680 literally the
01:01:40.320 opposite, I
01:01:40.980 would say the
01:01:41.420 same thing.
01:01:41.940 I go, well, I
01:01:43.400 don't believe any
01:01:43.960 data.
01:01:46.800 But maybe, I
01:01:49.100 don't know what
01:01:49.700 would be the
01:01:50.260 operating mechanism
01:01:51.360 that would make
01:01:52.620 things worse for
01:01:53.520 white citizens in
01:01:54.620 Minnesota.
01:01:56.340 What exactly
01:01:57.060 would cause that?
01:01:58.660 I mean, it's not
01:01:59.560 discrimination in
01:02:00.960 the classic sense.
01:02:03.100 Would it be
01:02:03.500 active?
01:02:04.700 It wouldn't
01:02:05.200 even be reverse
01:02:06.560 discrimination.
01:02:08.300 I don't know.
01:02:08.760 I guess I
01:02:10.480 would doubt
01:02:11.540 the data more
01:02:13.100 than I would
01:02:13.640 doubt my
01:02:14.240 understanding of
01:02:14.980 why it would
01:02:15.500 happen, because
01:02:16.480 I think maybe it
01:02:17.320 didn't happen.
01:02:18.300 I suspect it's
01:02:19.040 closer to even
01:02:19.820 treatment.
01:02:23.480 All right.
01:02:24.820 So, who's
01:02:25.920 going to go to
01:02:26.400 jail first,
01:02:27.320 Trump or
01:02:28.880 Biden?
01:02:30.000 Here's my take.
01:02:31.400 I say neither
01:02:32.140 of them, because
01:02:33.620 I don't think we
01:02:34.240 live in a world
01:02:34.920 where the main
01:02:36.700 candidates for
01:02:37.460 president in all
01:02:38.360 likelihood are
01:02:39.200 going to be
01:02:39.580 jailed.
01:02:40.460 This is the
01:02:41.220 very definition
01:02:41.940 of too far.
01:02:44.720 If, can you
01:02:45.840 imagine Biden
01:02:46.580 winning an
01:02:47.180 election because
01:02:47.900 he jailed his
01:02:48.720 opponent?
01:02:50.100 Just imagine
01:02:50.700 that.
01:02:51.420 Or even winning
01:02:52.520 an election because
01:02:53.320 he made the
01:02:53.920 opponent unable
01:02:54.780 to run because
01:02:55.980 they got locked
01:02:56.640 up in the legal
01:02:57.740 system.
01:02:58.660 Would you be
01:02:59.080 okay with that?
01:03:00.540 You know, I
01:03:01.280 trust Americans
01:03:03.440 enough that there
01:03:05.280 would be enough
01:03:05.800 Democrats who
01:03:06.780 would say no
01:03:07.360 to that, that
01:03:09.780 a Republican
01:03:10.520 would somehow
01:03:11.400 be in charge
01:03:11.960 in the end.
01:03:13.220 I think
01:03:13.960 Democrats, not
01:03:15.860 all of them,
01:03:17.220 but I'd say a
01:03:18.220 solid 10% of
01:03:19.300 Democrats, if
01:03:20.400 you said, all
01:03:21.460 right, Trump
01:03:21.960 did bad things
01:03:22.800 and Biden took
01:03:23.740 him off the
01:03:24.160 field and made
01:03:25.500 it a non-competitive
01:03:26.540 election, how
01:03:27.660 many Democrats
01:03:28.340 would be okay
01:03:28.860 with that?
01:03:30.380 I don't think
01:03:31.260 all of them.
01:03:32.480 You'd only need
01:03:33.140 10% to side
01:03:34.720 with the
01:03:35.220 Republicans before
01:03:36.660 Republicans get
01:03:37.480 everything they
01:03:38.000 want.
01:03:40.260 You think it's
01:03:41.060 all?
01:03:42.280 I don't know.
01:03:42.800 I think if it
01:03:44.520 were the, well,
01:03:45.220 let me ask you
01:03:46.220 this.
01:03:46.800 Let's reverse it.
01:03:47.980 I know it
01:03:48.420 doesn't reverse,
01:03:49.220 but let's try.
01:03:51.380 Suppose Trump
01:03:53.020 were in office
01:03:53.700 and he put Joe
01:03:56.700 Biden in prison
01:03:57.600 over the, let's
01:03:59.840 say, the
01:04:00.120 Burisma stuff.
01:04:01.300 And when I
01:04:02.140 say Trump
01:04:02.820 did it, you
01:04:03.460 know, it
01:04:03.700 would be his
01:04:04.120 Department of
01:04:04.700 Justice that
01:04:05.240 would do it.
01:04:07.620 Would you be
01:04:08.300 okay with that?
01:04:09.980 Those of you
01:04:10.640 who lean right,
01:04:12.280 would you, you
01:04:12.780 would, literally,
01:04:14.060 you'd be okay
01:04:14.560 with that, jailing
01:04:15.880 his opponent
01:04:16.440 instead of
01:04:17.760 letting the
01:04:18.140 public decide.
01:04:20.860 Once he's in
01:04:21.600 the election, you
01:04:22.220 would be okay
01:04:22.680 with that.
01:04:24.000 Oh, I would
01:04:24.720 so not be okay
01:04:25.520 with that.
01:04:26.680 I would be very
01:04:27.840 not okay with
01:04:28.640 that.
01:04:29.860 And indeed, I
01:04:30.840 would say what
01:04:31.480 Comey said
01:04:32.180 about Hillary's
01:04:35.540 emails or
01:04:36.040 whatever it
01:04:36.380 was.
01:04:36.940 I think Comey
01:04:37.700 basically said
01:04:38.440 this should be
01:04:38.900 decided by the
01:04:39.620 public.
01:04:41.020 So I'll tell
01:04:41.520 the public, and
01:04:42.800 I don't think
01:04:43.260 the FBI should
01:04:44.180 be deciding who
01:04:45.160 wins the
01:04:45.500 election.
01:04:46.620 Now, you can
01:04:47.300 say you hate
01:04:47.900 Comey, you
01:04:48.480 can say he was
01:04:48.980 lying, blah,
01:04:49.820 blah, blah,
01:04:50.280 but I liked
01:04:51.160 what he said.
01:04:52.520 I liked that he
01:04:53.540 said we could
01:04:54.740 use the bureaucracy
01:04:55.620 to decide who
01:04:56.600 your president is,
01:04:58.440 or we could just
01:04:59.680 tell you what the
01:05:00.300 situation is, and
01:05:02.020 then you can
01:05:02.520 decide who the
01:05:03.120 president is.
01:05:04.460 Now, I'm not
01:05:06.820 going to defend
01:05:07.340 Comey, but I'm
01:05:08.680 going to defend
01:05:09.080 the concept.
01:05:10.740 I love the
01:05:11.660 concept that the
01:05:12.780 bureaucracy should
01:05:13.680 stay under the
01:05:14.360 decision once you
01:05:15.980 get into the
01:05:16.700 final push.
01:05:19.900 If you could
01:05:20.980 take a candidate
01:05:21.720 out before the
01:05:23.340 primaries, okay,
01:05:26.340 that's a very
01:05:27.080 different situation.
01:05:27.900 But once you're
01:05:30.520 polling at over
01:05:31.260 50%, like
01:05:32.600 Trump, at
01:05:33.880 least for the
01:05:34.860 primary, I
01:05:37.620 just don't think
01:05:38.320 you take them
01:05:38.760 out.
01:05:39.840 I think you
01:05:40.320 just live with
01:05:41.720 what you got.
01:05:42.780 And the reason
01:05:43.460 is you don't
01:05:43.980 want to start a
01:05:44.620 precedent where
01:05:46.240 one team in power
01:05:47.920 is trying to
01:05:48.440 arrest their
01:05:49.060 competition.
01:05:50.480 That just has
01:05:51.380 to be off the
01:05:52.120 table completely.
01:05:52.980 And now, the
01:05:55.600 downside is that
01:05:57.200 people will get
01:05:57.700 away with crime,
01:05:58.840 and I'm okay
01:05:59.400 with that, compared
01:06:01.420 to the
01:06:01.740 alternative.
01:06:03.300 I would totally
01:06:04.400 be in favor of
01:06:05.440 unequal justice
01:06:06.660 and some people
01:06:08.080 being treated
01:06:09.040 above the law,
01:06:10.060 because it would
01:06:11.480 be good for me.
01:06:13.260 If I have a
01:06:14.400 president who's
01:06:15.120 functioning, and
01:06:16.740 their only problem
01:06:17.440 was something they
01:06:18.580 may have done in
01:06:19.240 the past that's
01:06:20.600 not likely to be
01:06:21.700 repeated, at
01:06:22.340 least in the
01:06:22.740 same way, I
01:06:24.720 think it's like
01:06:25.980 hiring a plumber
01:06:26.820 who used to
01:06:29.220 drink, right?
01:06:31.240 If he used to
01:06:32.140 drink, but he
01:06:33.740 doesn't now, and
01:06:35.360 he can fix my
01:06:36.000 pipes, it's good
01:06:37.980 enough.
01:06:39.160 So you can be
01:06:40.940 selfish and just
01:06:42.800 vote for the
01:06:43.680 candidate who
01:06:44.500 will do the
01:06:44.880 best job for
01:06:45.660 whatever you
01:06:46.180 want done.
01:06:46.980 You don't have
01:06:47.960 to care about
01:06:49.360 things they did
01:06:50.060 in the past.
01:06:51.700 You can, but
01:06:53.040 you don't have
01:06:53.500 to.
01:06:54.280 You can just
01:06:54.760 vote for your
01:06:55.300 best interest.
01:07:00.660 All right.
01:07:06.280 Painters can
01:07:06.940 handle booze the
01:07:07.860 best.
01:07:08.780 Well, all right.
01:07:12.300 I think I've
01:07:13.060 talked about
01:07:13.500 everything that
01:07:14.000 needs to be
01:07:14.440 talked about,
01:07:15.300 except for
01:07:16.300 Justin Trudeau's
01:07:17.540 divorce.
01:07:18.020 did you see the
01:07:20.960 Babylon Bee's
01:07:21.800 take on that?
01:07:23.860 The Babylon Bee
01:07:25.000 said, the
01:07:26.460 country was
01:07:27.480 shocked to
01:07:29.460 learn that
01:07:29.940 Justin Trudeau
01:07:31.180 was married to
01:07:31.780 a woman.
01:07:34.940 They're pretty
01:07:35.660 edgy.
01:07:37.960 How many of you
01:07:39.020 expect that his
01:07:40.100 next partner will
01:07:40.980 be male?
01:07:41.460 not that there's
01:07:44.620 anything wrong
01:07:45.080 with that, but
01:07:46.940 isn't it a sort
01:07:47.780 of begging?
01:07:49.300 It feels like
01:07:50.360 reality is
01:07:53.200 forming up,
01:07:55.400 and honestly,
01:07:56.720 if he
01:07:57.360 transitioned, I
01:07:58.180 wouldn't be
01:07:58.500 surprised.
01:07:59.800 Would you?
01:08:01.800 Would anybody
01:08:02.660 be surprised if
01:08:04.300 he transitioned
01:08:04.900 to a woman?
01:08:06.440 I don't think
01:08:07.020 I wouldn't be
01:08:07.440 surprised at all.
01:08:08.100 I wouldn't
01:08:09.400 bet on it.
01:08:10.540 I would bet
01:08:10.980 against it,
01:08:12.000 but it
01:08:12.740 wouldn't surprise
01:08:13.220 me.
01:08:13.840 I would say,
01:08:14.360 well, who
01:08:16.220 would say we
01:08:16.960 didn't see it
01:08:17.440 coming, or it
01:08:18.940 was totally
01:08:19.360 impossible?
01:08:21.880 Nobody would
01:08:22.560 say it's
01:08:22.840 impossible.
01:08:23.800 I think you'd
01:08:24.260 say, well,
01:08:24.980 okay, good
01:08:26.560 luck to you.
01:08:33.440 Post some
01:08:34.060 shorts, I
01:08:34.600 probably should.
01:08:38.100 All right.
01:08:41.500 He has a
01:08:42.160 twin sister?
01:08:43.560 Is that
01:08:44.080 true?
01:08:44.860 Justin Trudeau
01:08:45.640 has a twin
01:08:46.120 sister?
01:08:49.100 Somebody's,
01:08:49.700 no?
01:08:51.100 Or he would
01:08:51.900 transition into
01:08:52.760 his twin sister?
01:08:54.760 All right, well,
01:08:55.320 we don't know what
01:08:56.060 family members he
01:08:56.920 has, so I'm
01:08:57.340 making that up,
01:08:57.960 I guess.
01:08:58.960 All right,
01:08:59.400 YouTube, thanks
01:09:00.320 for joining, and
01:09:00.980 thanks for joining
01:09:01.600 early.
01:09:02.060 Sorry I
01:09:02.600 inadvertently got
01:09:04.780 you in here too
01:09:05.320 early.
01:09:05.580 and I'll
01:09:07.160 see you
01:09:07.820 tomorrow.
01:09:09.260 Thank you.