Real Coffee with Scott Adams - August 05, 2023


Episode 2191 Scott Adams: It's Better If I Don't Put A Title On Today's Show. Anything Could Happen


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 4 minutes

Words per Minute

146.57048

Word Count

9,475

Sentence Count

787

Misogynist Sentences

27

Hate Speech Sentences

31


Summary

The mayor of New York City is considering putting migrant camps in Central Park, and other places in the city. And a new kind of AI influencer is on the rise, and she's a little bit creepy. Guest: Scott Adams, host of the podcast Coffee with Scott Adams.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Doo-doo-doo-doo-doo-doo.
00:00:02.220 Doo-doo-doo-doo.
00:00:04.440 Good morning, everybody, and welcome
00:00:06.040 to the highlight of human civilization.
00:00:09.680 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams.
00:00:12.080 Wow, did you pick the right day to come.
00:00:15.080 We got a show for you, like this show of shows,
00:00:17.540 like no show has ever been.
00:00:19.220 Better than any show, everybody's saying so.
00:00:21.380 And if you'd like to take it up to levels
00:00:23.040 that are unheard of,
00:00:25.240 all you need is a mug or a glass,
00:00:27.180 a tank or chalice or a stein,
00:00:28.420 a canteen jug or a flask,
00:00:30.280 a vessel of any kind,
00:00:32.260 fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:00:33.760 I like coffee.
00:00:35.660 Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure
00:00:37.580 that don't be the day,
00:00:39.500 the thing that makes everything better.
00:00:40.760 It's called the simultaneous sip.
00:00:44.620 What happens now? Go.
00:00:49.400 Yeah, extra good this morning.
00:00:51.540 It was a little extra good.
00:00:54.540 There are no bonus points for gargling.
00:00:58.320 No, no, no, no, no.
00:01:00.760 Hold on.
00:01:01.600 We've got a couple of high achievers here.
00:01:03.900 They're trying to take it beyond the simultaneous sip
00:01:06.460 to gargling.
00:01:08.560 No, no.
00:01:10.340 The sip is good enough.
00:01:12.460 Stay.
00:01:13.460 Don't go to gargle.
00:01:14.440 Well, we've got all kinds of news.
00:01:17.360 Obviously, we'd be talking about the Trump stuff.
00:01:21.200 We'll get to that.
00:01:22.220 But while people are streaming in to watch,
00:01:25.220 apparently Mayor Adams,
00:01:27.080 no relationship to me in New York City,
00:01:29.840 is considering putting migrant camps in Central Park
00:01:33.560 and a bunch of other places in New York City.
00:01:36.160 What do you think of that?
00:01:37.100 A migrant camp in Central Park.
00:01:42.220 How about, let me see if I can figure out
00:01:46.400 how best to manage this situation.
00:01:49.840 How about we do, I don't know,
00:01:52.740 the only thing that was possible to do that could work.
00:01:56.480 How about that?
00:01:57.140 Yes, literally the only thing that would be a good idea
00:02:00.900 is to find some public space,
00:02:04.080 put up some tents,
00:02:06.120 and get them off the sidewalks
00:02:08.080 where the other people don't want to walk past them.
00:02:10.980 Of course this is a good idea.
00:02:13.900 It's because compared to the other ideas,
00:02:16.200 the other ideas are horrible.
00:02:19.460 Do you think you'd be happy
00:02:20.900 to know there's a migrant camp
00:02:22.900 in the middle of Central Park
00:02:24.760 if you lived in New York City?
00:02:26.280 No, you wouldn't be happy about it,
00:02:28.460 but it's way better than the alternative.
00:02:31.000 And now what's the third alternative?
00:02:33.400 Name one other thing you can do.
00:02:35.680 Let's say, kill them all, put them in jail,
00:02:38.700 ship them back, can't do that,
00:02:40.620 it's a sanctuary city.
00:02:42.620 What are you going to do?
00:02:44.200 They're basically down to one option.
00:02:46.740 So even talking about that as an option is weird
00:02:50.360 because it's really a tent on the sidewalk
00:02:52.720 or a tent in the park.
00:02:55.000 It's kind of a no-brainer.
00:02:56.840 So yes, tent in the park.
00:02:59.420 And as I told you before,
00:03:00.900 I've invested in camping
00:03:03.040 as a personal investment.
00:03:06.660 I bought a company that does camping stuff.
00:03:11.020 Because I just feel like,
00:03:13.040 I hate to say it,
00:03:14.420 but a lot of humankind is going to move outdoors.
00:03:17.740 Does it seem like that to you?
00:03:19.120 That we're kind of at a point
00:03:21.220 where just a whole bunch of humans
00:03:22.660 are going to be living outdoors?
00:03:25.500 And I'm not even sure they'll be less happy.
00:03:28.360 You know, if it's someplace
00:03:29.640 where the climate is survivable,
00:03:32.740 I don't know, they might be happier.
00:03:34.120 Who knows?
00:03:34.500 Well, I say that human women
00:03:39.180 are 20% obsolete, roughly speaking.
00:03:42.540 And by that I mean 20% of human males
00:03:45.720 probably would already choose an AI companion.
00:03:50.680 Because the big story is
00:03:52.920 there's an AI influencer,
00:03:55.120 there are probably more of them,
00:03:56.540 that are completely artificial.
00:03:58.060 They're just digital creations
00:03:59.320 that look like human women,
00:04:01.360 except very attractive,
00:04:03.540 and men are sending them money
00:04:04.840 and forming connections and stuff.
00:04:07.060 I would say that at the moment,
00:04:09.640 right now, current technology,
00:04:12.400 20% of women are obsolete.
00:04:14.720 And by that I mean
00:04:17.180 that if you had a choice
00:04:19.620 of matching up with one of the least,
00:04:22.580 you know, the bottom 20% of women,
00:04:25.240 you'd probably choose an AI woman instead.
00:04:28.900 If you could get, you know,
00:04:30.380 somebody in the top 5%,
00:04:32.120 you'd probably still prefer a human woman.
00:04:35.380 Very much so.
00:04:36.800 But the bottom 20%,
00:04:38.720 you don't think I would prefer right now
00:04:41.780 if the only option I had
00:04:43.220 was a woman who was in,
00:04:45.760 let's say, the bottom 20% of desirability.
00:04:48.840 It was my only option.
00:04:50.780 But I have an option for an AI creature
00:04:54.080 that could be my companion.
00:04:55.540 There's no contest.
00:04:56.960 I would take the AI all day long.
00:04:59.940 Right?
00:05:01.080 Am I talking crazy?
00:05:03.560 Is that crazy?
00:05:05.600 Now, here's what I say to you.
00:05:09.080 For every single person
00:05:11.420 who tells me that that's weird
00:05:12.800 and creepy and wrong
00:05:13.860 and will never happen,
00:05:15.380 I say to you,
00:05:16.660 you do not understand
00:05:17.960 the depth of the loneliness problem
00:05:22.460 in the United States.
00:05:24.720 Loneliness is one of those things
00:05:26.380 that if it's not bothering you personally,
00:05:28.820 it's kind of invisible, isn't it?
00:05:32.220 Other people's loneliness
00:05:33.560 doesn't bother you.
00:05:34.820 Do you know why?
00:05:35.420 Because you're not with them
00:05:37.340 by definition.
00:05:39.780 Yeah.
00:05:40.280 Other people's loneliness
00:05:41.960 doesn't bother you
00:05:42.980 because you're not with them.
00:05:44.920 It's just something happening
00:05:45.900 in a stranger's head
00:05:46.860 that you don't see.
00:05:48.640 So you've got this
00:05:49.800 enormous loneliness problem
00:05:52.680 in the United States,
00:05:53.660 one of our biggest problems,
00:05:55.080 I would say.
00:05:55.900 Very near the top
00:05:56.900 of our biggest problems.
00:05:58.760 And the AI
00:05:59.640 is clearly the solution.
00:06:01.280 And there's no way
00:06:03.540 that you're not going to see
00:06:05.360 at least 20% to 30%
00:06:07.800 of the public,
00:06:08.540 the male public especially,
00:06:10.660 going to AI companions.
00:06:12.560 I think in five years,
00:06:14.220 30% of men
00:06:15.120 will have AI-generated companions.
00:06:18.200 30% of men in five years.
00:06:20.500 That's my prediction.
00:06:22.900 Somebody says you're projecting.
00:06:25.520 That is my point.
00:06:28.260 Now, you're not disagreeing with me.
00:06:30.360 All right, let me say that again.
00:06:31.560 Somebody says I'm projecting.
00:06:33.620 When I say that 30% of men
00:06:35.540 will have AI companions,
00:06:37.480 that's my point.
00:06:39.380 My point is I'm projecting.
00:06:41.540 I'm saying that if you were,
00:06:43.300 if you had experienced
00:06:44.320 any loneliness in the past year,
00:06:47.000 you know, if you've gone
00:06:47.580 through a divorce, et cetera,
00:06:49.000 if you've experienced it,
00:06:51.440 you agree with me.
00:06:54.000 All right, that's,
00:06:54.640 absolutes are weird.
00:06:56.060 But mostly,
00:06:57.460 if you've experienced it,
00:06:59.540 you agree with me.
00:07:01.280 If you haven't experienced it,
00:07:02.780 you say,
00:07:03.060 whoa, you're projecting.
00:07:04.640 There can't be that many people
00:07:05.960 like you, Scott.
00:07:07.340 No, my point is
00:07:08.420 you don't know how many people
00:07:09.780 there are like me.
00:07:11.360 Now, at the moment,
00:07:12.060 I'm not that lonely, right?
00:07:13.460 So, if you're looking at me,
00:07:15.500 you know, this week,
00:07:16.780 you know, I'm getting my life
00:07:19.480 slowly, you know,
00:07:20.900 rebuilding from, you know,
00:07:22.320 divorce, you know,
00:07:24.320 discombobulation.
00:07:25.700 So, I'm in good shape
00:07:26.740 at the moment.
00:07:27.920 I have zero interest
00:07:29.440 in the AI companion
00:07:31.120 at the moment.
00:07:33.660 But if you take me back
00:07:35.360 to any of the days,
00:07:37.100 let's say,
00:07:37.880 immediately following divorce,
00:07:39.540 divorce and how that feels,
00:07:41.820 if that had been
00:07:42.600 a permanent situation,
00:07:44.500 and I'm lucky
00:07:45.060 because I'm healthy
00:07:46.220 and I'm rich
00:07:46.920 and I'm a public figure.
00:07:49.620 So, as you might imagine,
00:07:51.580 it's kind of easy
00:07:52.260 for me to make friends.
00:07:54.480 You know,
00:07:55.020 there's like no,
00:07:56.140 there's just no barrier.
00:07:57.720 I can make as many friends
00:07:58.700 as I want.
00:07:59.780 So, you know,
00:08:00.420 I can fix my problem.
00:08:01.660 I don't have any problem
00:08:02.620 that needs to be fixed.
00:08:04.520 You know,
00:08:04.680 it just takes a little while
00:08:05.560 to manage things.
00:08:08.000 But,
00:08:08.460 if I were in that situation
00:08:09.960 and didn't see a way out,
00:08:12.040 if I didn't see a way
00:08:13.160 to make friends
00:08:13.900 or to have any kind of
00:08:15.260 human interaction,
00:08:17.320 yeah,
00:08:17.740 absolutely,
00:08:18.360 I'd go AI.
00:08:19.420 And if you don't see that,
00:08:22.040 you're really going to be
00:08:23.000 blindsided by one
00:08:24.040 of the biggest trends.
00:08:26.520 All right.
00:08:30.100 And ladies,
00:08:31.120 if you thought
00:08:31.700 that you could abuse nerds
00:08:33.060 for over a hundred years
00:08:35.160 and the nerds
00:08:36.800 would not find a way
00:08:37.760 to invent something
00:08:39.200 to replace you,
00:08:40.640 well,
00:08:41.060 you were,
00:08:42.260 you had a little blind spot
00:08:43.580 there,
00:08:43.880 I think.
00:08:44.700 A little bit of a blind spot.
00:08:46.820 All right.
00:08:47.380 Yes,
00:08:47.680 of course,
00:08:48.140 the nerds are going
00:08:48.740 to replace women
00:08:49.480 who don't have interest
00:08:51.520 in nerds.
00:08:52.740 Now,
00:08:53.000 when I say nerds,
00:08:53.760 I mean that
00:08:54.180 in the most
00:08:54.760 complimentary way.
00:08:58.300 I love engineers
00:08:59.520 and technical people.
00:09:01.660 so I think
00:09:03.820 they're going to do
00:09:04.280 what they have to do.
00:09:05.400 They're going to build
00:09:06.060 themselves some friends.
00:09:08.340 All right,
00:09:08.680 I saw a tweet
00:09:09.700 by Men's Sexual Health
00:09:11.700 and it was a list
00:09:13.680 of the,
00:09:15.260 what do they call it,
00:09:16.100 the eight signs
00:09:17.900 of a good woman.
00:09:19.540 Would you like to know
00:09:20.640 the eight signs
00:09:22.140 of a good woman?
00:09:23.980 All right.
00:09:25.040 Now,
00:09:25.340 you want to get all eight.
00:09:27.440 You want to get
00:09:28.140 all eight of these,
00:09:28.820 so look at
00:09:30.460 the women around you
00:09:32.140 and see which ones
00:09:34.000 could hit all eight.
00:09:35.780 Number one,
00:09:36.520 loyal,
00:09:37.980 modest,
00:09:39.920 tattoo-less.
00:09:41.440 Now,
00:09:41.720 this is somebody
00:09:42.280 else's opinion.
00:09:43.200 I'm not reading
00:09:43.720 my opinion.
00:09:44.780 This is from
00:09:45.320 a Men's Sexual Health,
00:09:46.700 that's just the name
00:09:47.600 of the Twitter account.
00:09:49.820 No male friends.
00:09:53.060 No male friends.
00:09:54.840 Not glued to her phone.
00:09:56.260 doesn't have Instagram
00:09:58.500 or TikTok,
00:10:00.120 is mentally
00:10:00.740 and emotionally stable,
00:10:02.400 and has a good
00:10:03.500 relationship
00:10:04.060 with her father.
00:10:06.340 Now,
00:10:06.980 I've never seen
00:10:07.720 such a strong endorsement
00:10:08.960 of the Amish,
00:10:10.380 but it's a good thing
00:10:12.660 the Amish are finally
00:10:13.860 getting their due.
00:10:15.340 And Amish women,
00:10:17.240 boom,
00:10:18.840 Amish women
00:10:19.600 killing it.
00:10:21.140 So if you'd like
00:10:22.060 a woman who is,
00:10:23.980 as Men's Sexual Health
00:10:24.860 says a good woman,
00:10:26.920 if you want
00:10:27.340 a good woman,
00:10:28.940 oh,
00:10:29.340 don't get any
00:10:29.900 of those harlots
00:10:30.600 with tattoos.
00:10:32.480 Don't come home
00:10:33.300 with some tattooed harlot
00:10:34.720 when you could have
00:10:36.080 an Amish woman
00:10:36.700 and really,
00:10:38.980 really get
00:10:39.400 the good stuff.
00:10:40.960 All right.
00:10:44.600 I saw one prediction
00:10:46.940 from Jean-Francois
00:10:48.980 de Calipier.
00:10:50.160 And if you don't mind,
00:10:53.240 I'm going to pronounce
00:10:54.020 his name again
00:10:54.800 just for my own fun.
00:10:57.520 So you could talk
00:10:58.320 among yourselves,
00:10:59.420 but I'd like to
00:11:00.120 wrestle with his name
00:11:01.860 a little bit more.
00:11:03.640 Jean-Francois
00:11:04.700 Galipier.
00:11:06.200 Galipier.
00:11:07.960 I hope that's close.
00:11:09.800 Anyway.
00:11:10.640 All right.
00:11:10.900 He has a white-pilling
00:11:12.920 kind of opinion
00:11:13.980 that if you have
00:11:15.340 a bunch of AI
00:11:16.500 digital fake women,
00:11:18.280 it will make
00:11:19.860 the real human women
00:11:22.160 who are trying
00:11:23.340 to look pretty
00:11:24.120 on social media
00:11:25.240 a dime a dozen.
00:11:27.480 Because if,
00:11:28.220 right now,
00:11:28.720 if you see a beautiful woman
00:11:29.840 on social media,
00:11:31.820 you say to yourself,
00:11:32.840 whoa,
00:11:33.380 a real live
00:11:34.060 beautiful woman.
00:11:35.320 But suppose
00:11:36.200 nine out of ten of them
00:11:37.240 were not real.
00:11:39.880 What if nine out of ten
00:11:40.900 are just not real?
00:11:43.560 Well,
00:11:44.000 you would
00:11:44.680 maybe slowly
00:11:45.900 or even quickly
00:11:46.800 decide that
00:11:48.240 looking at these pictures
00:11:49.320 on social media
00:11:50.260 was just
00:11:51.480 not doing it
00:11:52.600 for you anymore.
00:11:54.080 Because it was just,
00:11:55.460 you would just be
00:11:56.320 overwhelmed
00:11:56.800 with the same look,
00:11:58.200 right?
00:11:58.500 You would just,
00:11:58.960 oh, yeah,
00:11:59.440 it's perfect.
00:12:00.300 Then when you saw
00:12:00.840 a real human,
00:12:01.640 you'd be like,
00:12:02.080 oh, a little flawed.
00:12:04.720 So one thing
00:12:05.800 might be that
00:12:06.560 the AI,
00:12:08.300 you know,
00:12:08.580 women posing
00:12:09.680 on AI
00:12:10.320 may become
00:12:11.020 a thing of the past
00:12:11.940 because they would
00:12:13.080 be competing
00:12:13.580 with AI
00:12:14.180 and losing.
00:12:15.760 The AI
00:12:16.080 would just look better.
00:12:19.200 So,
00:12:20.200 maybe,
00:12:21.740 maybe,
00:12:22.500 but I think that
00:12:23.400 I think the real big change
00:12:25.740 is going to be people
00:12:26.440 having real AI
00:12:27.560 companions.
00:12:29.520 All right,
00:12:29.740 let's talk about politics.
00:12:30.840 I know that's why
00:12:31.440 you're here.
00:12:33.140 So,
00:12:34.260 Vivek
00:12:34.740 is,
00:12:36.720 I feel like
00:12:38.020 a broken record.
00:12:39.800 Every day I wake up
00:12:41.220 and every day
00:12:42.580 there's a new story
00:12:43.500 about Vivek Ramaswamy
00:12:45.100 getting the so-called
00:12:47.500 earned media.
00:12:49.000 In other words,
00:12:49.480 he's doing something
00:12:50.260 in the real world
00:12:51.320 that makes the media
00:12:52.960 it's impossible
00:12:53.820 to ignore him.
00:12:55.340 Do you remember
00:12:55.800 what Chris Christie
00:12:56.720 did this week?
00:12:58.960 I don't.
00:13:00.440 Do you remember
00:13:00.860 what Tim Scott
00:13:01.920 did this week?
00:13:04.440 Probably talked
00:13:05.300 to people.
00:13:07.060 Do you remember
00:13:07.840 what Pence
00:13:08.420 did this week?
00:13:09.180 got blamed
00:13:11.780 for some shit,
00:13:12.620 said some dumb shit.
00:13:13.800 That's it.
00:13:14.940 That's all you know
00:13:15.680 about all those
00:13:16.320 other candidates,
00:13:17.220 right?
00:13:17.900 But what do you know
00:13:18.660 about Vivek?
00:13:19.520 Well,
00:13:20.060 this is just one
00:13:20.960 of the three things
00:13:21.720 he's going to do today
00:13:22.540 that are newsworthy.
00:13:23.920 He's proposing
00:13:24.640 a constitutional amendment
00:13:27.560 that requires citizens
00:13:28.660 from 18 to 24
00:13:29.860 to pass a civics test
00:13:31.280 in order to vote.
00:13:33.460 The same test
00:13:34.820 immigrants
00:13:35.480 have to take
00:13:37.140 to become
00:13:37.820 naturalized citizens.
00:13:39.180 Do you like it
00:13:41.800 or hate it?
00:13:42.940 Love it or hate it?
00:13:45.020 You can't vote
00:13:46.020 even if you're
00:13:46.760 a natural citizen.
00:13:47.940 You'd have to have
00:13:48.460 a constitutional amendment.
00:13:51.700 But you've got to be
00:13:53.060 at least as aware
00:13:54.320 of the country
00:13:54.840 as the immigrants
00:13:56.120 who have to
00:13:57.740 pass the test
00:13:58.420 to become citizens.
00:14:01.240 Yeah.
00:14:02.940 So here's,
00:14:04.080 let me talk about this
00:14:05.160 in two different ways.
00:14:06.100 From a political perspective
00:14:08.380 was this a good play?
00:14:11.000 From a political perspective.
00:14:16.000 No, hold on.
00:14:17.360 We're talking about it.
00:14:19.380 No, we're talking about it
00:14:20.500 so it's a good play.
00:14:22.700 Remember when Trump
00:14:24.120 would say crazy things
00:14:25.440 that you wouldn't
00:14:26.240 even agree with
00:14:27.040 and went too far?
00:14:28.720 But then you learned
00:14:29.780 that the more attention
00:14:30.620 you get,
00:14:31.120 the better you do?
00:14:31.740 So he's getting attention.
00:14:34.420 If you don't like the idea,
00:14:36.680 that's irrelevant
00:14:37.520 to the politics.
00:14:39.000 Because the politics
00:14:39.740 is about earning attention
00:14:41.240 and you just got some,
00:14:42.400 got some free attention.
00:14:44.500 He's just killing it.
00:14:46.740 Nobody's coming close
00:14:48.140 to the level of,
00:14:50.620 let's say,
00:14:51.680 strategic intelligence
00:14:53.160 and execution
00:14:54.040 that Ramaswamy
00:14:57.000 is bringing to the thing.
00:14:58.360 Nobody's close.
00:14:59.660 He's just killing it.
00:15:00.620 The second best
00:15:02.160 is RFK Jr.,
00:15:03.200 who's actually
00:15:03.800 doing a good job as well.
00:15:05.820 Actually a great job.
00:15:07.480 I'm going to elevate
00:15:09.200 RFK Jr.
00:15:10.480 He and Vivek
00:15:12.300 are really standing out
00:15:14.500 in terms of how
00:15:15.560 to run a campaign
00:15:16.320 in an innovative way
00:15:18.400 that I think
00:15:18.920 will change campaigns forever.
00:15:21.700 Here's the other thing.
00:15:23.660 Vivek is running a campaign
00:15:25.420 that's changing
00:15:27.140 the real world.
00:15:29.100 Who did that before?
00:15:30.620 Anybody?
00:15:35.140 Vivek is actually
00:15:36.140 changing opinions
00:15:37.420 in the real world
00:15:39.300 about actual real topics
00:15:41.200 while he's running
00:15:42.820 for office.
00:15:43.800 He's changing opinions.
00:15:46.660 That is so next level.
00:15:48.900 You don't even expect
00:15:49.900 your candidate
00:15:50.480 to change the real world,
00:15:52.280 do you?
00:15:52.960 You don't expect,
00:15:53.940 you do not expect
00:15:54.680 the real world to change
00:15:56.200 because somebody's
00:15:57.200 running for office.
00:15:57.940 But he's actually
00:15:59.020 changing the real world.
00:16:00.540 One of the ways
00:16:01.140 he's changing it
00:16:01.900 is he's proven
00:16:02.620 there's a better way
00:16:03.280 to campaign.
00:16:04.480 He's already
00:16:05.220 completely changed
00:16:06.440 what people understand
00:16:08.220 about how a good
00:16:09.080 campaign would run.
00:16:10.940 If you keep ignoring
00:16:12.540 Vivek,
00:16:14.040 you're missing
00:16:14.760 one of the greatest
00:16:15.420 shows of all time.
00:16:17.440 he's found a way
00:16:20.280 to push into
00:16:21.280 the conversation
00:16:22.140 with no prior experience.
00:16:25.540 Only one person
00:16:26.440 has done that.
00:16:27.960 Trump.
00:16:29.020 And Trump,
00:16:29.640 you know,
00:16:29.880 Trump at least
00:16:30.380 was famous forever.
00:16:32.120 Right?
00:16:32.300 Vivek had a good book
00:16:34.380 and that was enough.
00:16:37.240 Like,
00:16:37.400 that's how much
00:16:37.840 game he has.
00:16:39.140 He managed to
00:16:40.120 push his way
00:16:40.880 into the top
00:16:41.500 of the conversation
00:16:42.320 from nowhere.
00:16:45.040 Just with skill.
00:16:47.280 Skill.
00:16:48.260 Just skill.
00:16:49.420 That's what it took.
00:16:51.760 Now,
00:16:52.420 part of it
00:16:52.900 is that
00:16:53.400 he's demonstrating
00:16:54.340 exactly what
00:16:55.400 he promotes.
00:16:56.620 So he's promoting
00:16:57.580 competence
00:17:00.440 above,
00:17:02.100 you know,
00:17:02.380 racial identity
00:17:03.140 and other identities.
00:17:04.740 That's his whole theme.
00:17:06.760 Don't you love
00:17:07.360 the fact that
00:17:07.860 he's demonstrating
00:17:08.660 it while he does it?
00:17:11.320 Right?
00:17:12.320 Like,
00:17:12.720 you've,
00:17:13.240 I don't know,
00:17:13.920 I don't know
00:17:14.300 if you've yet forgotten
00:17:15.420 the fact that
00:17:16.560 some would say
00:17:17.660 he's a person of color.
00:17:19.940 He's made it irrelevant.
00:17:21.840 Hasn't he?
00:17:22.780 The only thing
00:17:23.860 that his,
00:17:24.940 you know,
00:17:25.380 his ethnicity,
00:17:27.140 the only thing it is
00:17:28.040 is maybe a negative
00:17:28.920 if somebody
00:17:29.600 thinks they don't know
00:17:30.880 what a Hindu is.
00:17:32.340 And by the way,
00:17:32.960 let me remind you again,
00:17:34.380 if you're worried
00:17:35.640 about a Hindu,
00:17:36.760 you need to look into it.
00:17:38.480 That's not who you need
00:17:39.480 to be worried about.
00:17:40.860 Right?
00:17:41.360 You don't need
00:17:42.140 to be worried
00:17:42.600 about a Hindu.
00:17:44.420 I don't know
00:17:45.080 what you think
00:17:45.600 a Hindu is,
00:17:46.760 but just Google it.
00:17:48.400 You know,
00:17:48.560 do something.
00:17:50.160 There's not a lot
00:17:50.940 of big Hindu problems,
00:17:52.900 at least in the United States.
00:17:54.900 Right?
00:17:55.300 Yeah,
00:17:55.320 yeah,
00:17:56.620 it's a very,
00:17:57.120 it's a very respected
00:17:58.560 community.
00:18:01.360 So,
00:18:02.420 so that's interesting.
00:18:04.940 RFK Jr.
00:18:05.640 is suing Google
00:18:06.480 for censoring him.
00:18:08.500 I don't know
00:18:08.960 how you could win that.
00:18:10.500 That feels like
00:18:11.140 something you couldn't win.
00:18:12.620 But,
00:18:13.260 is it a good idea?
00:18:15.080 It's a great idea.
00:18:16.560 He's running for president.
00:18:17.700 It's a great idea.
00:18:18.860 Because win or lose,
00:18:20.160 he's now made me
00:18:20.960 pay attention
00:18:21.500 to the fact
00:18:22.120 that YouTube censored him.
00:18:23.500 Now,
00:18:24.720 I was kind of
00:18:25.100 vaguely aware of it,
00:18:26.700 but doesn't it help him
00:18:27.980 a lot to like
00:18:28.820 bring it to the front
00:18:29.580 of my mind?
00:18:30.360 Yeah.
00:18:31.200 This is good.
00:18:32.720 So,
00:18:33.400 RFK Jr.,
00:18:34.460 free,
00:18:34.940 free media,
00:18:36.220 doesn't matter
00:18:36.800 if he wins or lose,
00:18:37.860 it's the right,
00:18:38.380 it's the right play.
00:18:39.600 It just is the right play.
00:18:43.120 DeSantis and Newsom,
00:18:44.280 apparently it's going
00:18:45.040 to be real.
00:18:45.600 They're really going
00:18:46.020 to have a debate.
00:18:46.840 Hannity is going
00:18:47.540 to host it,
00:18:48.500 which is pretty baller
00:18:50.220 for Newsom,
00:18:50.840 I got to admit.
00:18:52.920 I got,
00:18:53.500 let me give Newsom
00:18:54.300 some credit.
00:18:55.920 He agreed
00:18:56.540 to a debate
00:18:57.660 hosted by Hannity.
00:19:01.820 You want to know
00:19:02.760 a little secret?
00:19:06.640 This is something
00:19:07.340 I learned a while ago,
00:19:08.360 I can't tell you
00:19:09.340 how I know,
00:19:10.300 but there are people
00:19:11.200 on the left
00:19:12.300 who really like Hannity
00:19:14.020 in person.
00:19:15.920 Did you know that?
00:19:17.840 That when,
00:19:18.720 you know,
00:19:18.940 if you're not talking
00:19:19.560 about the on-air
00:19:20.560 performances,
00:19:22.200 the Hannity's actually,
00:19:23.140 somebody that liberals
00:19:25.120 actually like in person.
00:19:26.900 He's kind of popular.
00:19:29.760 So,
00:19:30.520 it's not,
00:19:31.080 this isn't as weird
00:19:32.060 as you think.
00:19:33.200 It's not as weird
00:19:34.000 to have Hannity,
00:19:35.040 who you would imagine
00:19:35.860 would be,
00:19:36.940 you know,
00:19:37.180 a deep,
00:19:37.760 deep partisan in this,
00:19:39.880 but he's actually
00:19:41.100 more respected
00:19:41.900 by the left
00:19:42.580 than you think.
00:19:44.260 And I would be,
00:19:45.880 I'm very interested
00:19:46.740 to see if he can
00:19:47.480 pull this off.
00:19:48.220 if Hannity can pull
00:19:50.400 off a debate
00:19:51.640 where Hannity himself
00:19:53.820 does not become
00:19:54.660 the subject
00:19:55.180 of the conversation,
00:19:56.900 that would be
00:19:57.660 a tremendous
00:19:58.780 accomplishment.
00:20:01.920 If Hannity can pull
00:20:03.200 this off
00:20:03.780 and even the left
00:20:05.300 says,
00:20:06.140 okay,
00:20:07.060 you know,
00:20:07.560 that was just
00:20:08.020 a good debate.
00:20:09.000 I'm glad we saw it.
00:20:10.340 If he can pull that off,
00:20:11.440 it'll be one of the
00:20:12.000 greatest things
00:20:12.600 you've ever seen.
00:20:13.180 I don't think
00:20:15.500 he can,
00:20:16.540 honestly.
00:20:17.180 I'm going to bet
00:20:17.640 against it.
00:20:18.780 Because,
00:20:19.360 you know,
00:20:20.040 the left is too primed
00:20:21.300 to assume that
00:20:22.400 whatever he says
00:20:23.200 and anything he does
00:20:24.100 is going to look
00:20:24.980 partisan.
00:20:25.800 But if he could
00:20:26.700 pull it off
00:20:27.380 so that even the left
00:20:28.860 looked for something
00:20:30.480 to complain about
00:20:31.420 but they just
00:20:31.920 couldn't find it,
00:20:33.660 that would be
00:20:34.120 amazing.
00:20:35.240 That would be
00:20:35.600 amazing.
00:20:36.220 So I have a
00:20:37.680 very high opinion
00:20:38.680 of Hannity's
00:20:39.700 capabilities.
00:20:42.200 Really high.
00:20:43.180 He's one of those
00:20:43.920 talent stack guys
00:20:44.960 where,
00:20:46.060 you know,
00:20:46.240 if you look at
00:20:46.660 any one thing
00:20:47.540 that Hannity does,
00:20:49.180 you could think,
00:20:49.780 well,
00:20:49.960 I can think of
00:20:50.520 somebody who
00:20:50.900 could do that
00:20:51.380 better.
00:20:52.440 But try to find
00:20:53.120 somebody who can
00:20:53.720 do all of the
00:20:54.660 things that Hannity
00:20:55.380 can do at the
00:20:57.080 same time.
00:20:58.740 Good luck.
00:21:00.340 He's a pretty
00:21:01.400 unique individual.
00:21:02.580 And he did it
00:21:03.120 the old-fashioned way.
00:21:04.760 Took chances,
00:21:05.840 built up his
00:21:06.380 skill set,
00:21:07.780 collected a set
00:21:08.880 of skills that
00:21:09.480 work well together,
00:21:11.020 implemented them
00:21:11.780 in the right place,
00:21:12.560 worked hard,
00:21:13.180 perfect role
00:21:14.620 model in the
00:21:16.500 work sense.
00:21:18.080 You don't have to
00:21:18.780 agree with his
00:21:19.240 opinions.
00:21:19.840 That would be a
00:21:20.340 separate topic.
00:21:23.580 All right.
00:21:24.320 And I also like
00:21:25.320 the fact that
00:21:26.100 both Newsom and
00:21:27.400 DeSantis agreed to
00:21:28.480 this because what
00:21:29.800 it does is,
00:21:31.520 well,
00:21:32.280 I'm talking myself
00:21:33.120 out of it as I'm
00:21:33.880 talking.
00:21:34.660 But my first
00:21:35.600 thought was it
00:21:36.360 makes you think
00:21:36.980 past the sale.
00:21:37.740 The sale is,
00:21:41.120 can you see these
00:21:42.100 second-tier
00:21:42.920 candidates as
00:21:43.860 serious opponents,
00:21:45.720 like actually
00:21:46.360 running for the
00:21:46.980 top job?
00:21:48.180 And if you have
00:21:49.140 them debate,
00:21:50.060 your mind
00:21:50.700 automatically goes
00:21:51.800 to, oh,
00:21:52.280 that's a legitimate
00:21:53.520 competition.
00:21:55.760 If they had never
00:21:56.800 debated, it would be
00:21:57.780 easier to dismiss
00:21:58.760 them, assuming
00:22:00.140 Biden stays in
00:22:00.920 the race.
00:22:02.260 That is not
00:22:03.120 important.
00:22:03.500 But the mere
00:22:05.400 fact that they
00:22:06.000 would have their
00:22:06.460 own debate does
00:22:08.600 tell you a picture
00:22:09.360 of them being in
00:22:10.120 second place.
00:22:11.780 And that's
00:22:12.600 probably a story
00:22:13.320 that they're happy
00:22:14.040 with at the
00:22:14.500 moment.
00:22:15.500 I think DeSantis
00:22:16.240 would be completely
00:22:17.940 happy being the
00:22:19.580 solid second-place
00:22:20.920 choice because the
00:22:22.460 risk is that
00:22:23.060 something happens
00:22:23.700 with Trump legally
00:22:24.840 and he can't run
00:22:25.560 or something else.
00:22:27.800 You know,
00:22:28.040 there's also an
00:22:28.560 age risk.
00:22:31.300 So I'd say
00:22:32.180 that's all good.
00:22:32.840 I like everything
00:22:34.100 about, everything
00:22:35.400 from top to
00:22:36.320 bottom, I like
00:22:37.500 everything about
00:22:39.320 the DeSantis-
00:22:40.460 Newsom debate,
00:22:41.360 including Hannity
00:22:42.980 as the moderator.
00:22:44.900 Because you know
00:22:45.380 what, I'd rather
00:22:46.260 have somebody who
00:22:47.260 is well-known as
00:22:48.380 a, let's say,
00:22:49.780 a partisan, and
00:22:51.820 then they have to
00:22:52.460 work as hard as
00:22:53.140 they can to not
00:22:53.820 look like it in
00:22:54.580 public.
00:22:55.660 I like that.
00:22:56.840 Because if you
00:22:57.360 put in somebody
00:22:57.920 who's like
00:22:58.280 allegedly independent,
00:23:01.380 you know, let's
00:23:02.540 say you put in
00:23:03.260 Brett Baier.
00:23:05.760 Brett Baier, in
00:23:06.620 my opinion, is
00:23:07.800 actually wonderfully
00:23:09.580 nonpartisan.
00:23:11.660 I mean, he works
00:23:12.600 at an entity that
00:23:13.860 covers a certain
00:23:14.500 set of news, but
00:23:16.220 when he presents
00:23:16.980 it, he does a
00:23:17.900 really good job of
00:23:18.860 not being a
00:23:19.640 partisan.
00:23:20.320 But I think he
00:23:21.140 would be more of a
00:23:21.980 problem in this
00:23:22.720 case.
00:23:23.640 Because if you
00:23:24.320 have somebody whose
00:23:25.100 brand is nonpartisan,
00:23:27.860 everybody's going to
00:23:28.580 be debating his brand
00:23:29.940 and whether he
00:23:30.520 was really
00:23:30.900 nonpartisan.
00:23:32.320 But if you put
00:23:32.960 Hannity in there,
00:23:35.160 he's got the
00:23:35.740 highest bar of
00:23:36.660 all to look like
00:23:37.740 he's not favoring
00:23:38.920 one candidate.
00:23:40.600 And so you're
00:23:41.440 really going to
00:23:41.780 make him work for
00:23:42.540 it.
00:23:44.240 So it's
00:23:45.080 interesting.
00:23:45.720 We'll see.
00:23:46.820 Now, I think
00:23:47.320 it's unpredictable
00:23:50.260 how people will
00:23:51.500 regard it and how
00:23:52.860 it will turn out.
00:23:53.780 And it's very
00:23:54.280 unpredictable how
00:23:55.220 Hannity would do.
00:23:56.580 But there is a
00:23:57.360 possibility he could
00:23:58.180 nail it, because
00:23:59.280 he has the skill.
00:24:00.440 He does have the
00:24:01.140 skill to nail it.
00:24:03.320 All right.
00:24:06.800 Trump has famously
00:24:08.160 truthed, if you go
00:24:10.920 after me, I'm
00:24:11.880 coming after you.
00:24:13.760 I would think that
00:24:14.900 almost everybody
00:24:15.820 would interpret that
00:24:16.780 as talking about his
00:24:18.600 legal jeopardy at
00:24:19.780 the moment.
00:24:21.140 And that who he's
00:24:22.280 coming after would
00:24:23.180 be anybody who is
00:24:24.640 on the other side of
00:24:25.500 him in that.
00:24:26.480 So how do you
00:24:28.000 feel about that?
00:24:29.800 Do you think that,
00:24:30.680 well, of course, the
00:24:31.460 legal system already
00:24:32.620 warned him off and
00:24:33.760 said, hey, don't do
00:24:34.620 that.
00:24:34.880 You're trying to, you
00:24:36.100 know, this would bias
00:24:37.000 people and blah, blah,
00:24:38.420 blah.
00:24:39.140 So, of course, the
00:24:40.320 legal system is pushing
00:24:41.620 back on him.
00:24:43.520 But here's my take.
00:24:45.620 If this were a normal
00:24:47.080 criminal trial, then
00:24:49.340 having the person who's
00:24:50.540 the defendant threaten
00:24:52.460 the people who might be
00:24:53.580 trying to put him in
00:24:54.340 jail directly and
00:24:55.300 publicly, very, very
00:24:57.400 bad.
00:24:58.680 Very bad.
00:24:59.520 And I would certainly
00:25:00.200 want the judge to try
00:25:02.300 to, you know, tamp
00:25:04.120 that down as hard as
00:25:05.200 possible.
00:25:05.920 Very, very bad.
00:25:07.520 However, I don't think
00:25:09.260 there are any honest
00:25:11.280 observers who think
00:25:12.540 this is a criminal
00:25:13.400 trial.
00:25:14.740 Not honest ones.
00:25:16.200 I'll give you that
00:25:17.220 lots of you, there
00:25:18.160 might be people even
00:25:19.120 watching here who think
00:25:20.700 this is really about
00:25:21.620 crimes.
00:25:22.300 And if you do, I just
00:25:24.720 feel sorry for you.
00:25:26.300 You know, I just have
00:25:26.900 some empathy for what
00:25:28.700 has been done to you.
00:25:30.380 But if you're like
00:25:31.860 everybody else, you see
00:25:33.020 this as the people who
00:25:34.600 actually pay attention.
00:25:35.840 You see this as a purely
00:25:37.400 political act.
00:25:39.260 In the context of a
00:25:40.680 purely political act, I
00:25:42.080 do want as much
00:25:43.400 threatening as possible.
00:25:45.800 So I'm totally in favor of
00:25:48.000 Trump saying, if you come
00:25:49.940 for the king, and you
00:25:51.860 miss, I'm going to burn
00:25:53.140 you down.
00:25:54.420 That's exactly what I
00:25:55.640 want to hear.
00:25:56.260 That's the safest
00:25:56.980 situation.
00:25:58.300 I want the republic to
00:25:59.620 avoid all danger.
00:26:01.240 I want the republic to
00:26:02.280 have no violence.
00:26:03.160 I want the republic to
00:26:03.940 have no revolution.
00:26:05.740 I want the republic to
00:26:07.160 run the way the
00:26:08.560 citizens want it.
00:26:10.100 You know, educate
00:26:11.120 things, adjudicate
00:26:12.320 things, and give us
00:26:14.500 some results and let us
00:26:15.440 go on with our lives.
00:26:16.820 No violence.
00:26:17.540 How do you get no
00:26:19.840 violence?
00:26:21.760 Do you know why there's
00:26:22.560 no violence in my house?
00:26:24.640 Does anybody know why?
00:26:26.340 Because I'm capable of
00:26:27.640 violence.
00:26:29.000 That's right.
00:26:30.060 The reason that somebody
00:26:31.240 doesn't just kick down my
00:26:32.420 door and take my shit is
00:26:34.460 because I'd kill them.
00:26:36.460 That's why.
00:26:38.040 That's the only reason.
00:26:39.440 Is there another reason?
00:26:41.020 No, there is not.
00:26:41.920 There's not another reason.
00:26:43.820 Right.
00:26:45.000 The risk of male
00:26:46.960 violence is the only
00:26:47.960 thing that keeps
00:26:48.500 civilization together.
00:26:51.000 You know, Jordan
00:26:52.120 Peterson says it best.
00:26:53.500 So if you want to see
00:26:54.160 the smart version of
00:26:55.340 that argument, see his.
00:26:56.940 But civilization is
00:26:58.680 held together by males
00:27:00.920 entirely.
00:27:02.300 Women are not part of
00:27:03.120 the conversation.
00:27:04.600 By males putting up
00:27:06.360 incredible threats of
00:27:07.440 violence to each other.
00:27:09.520 And by the way, we all
00:27:10.600 see it.
00:27:11.920 So let me say it
00:27:12.920 directly.
00:27:14.060 Trump says if you go
00:27:15.140 after me, I'm coming
00:27:16.080 after you.
00:27:17.960 Ladies, sit it out.
00:27:20.880 You can sit this one
00:27:21.760 out.
00:27:23.020 This is not about the
00:27:24.200 women of America
00:27:24.940 anymore.
00:27:26.380 This is about the men
00:27:27.600 of America.
00:27:28.840 And Trump just put down
00:27:29.980 the, he put down the
00:27:31.660 fact.
00:27:32.860 I don't even call this
00:27:33.940 a threat.
00:27:35.140 This is a statement
00:27:36.180 of fact.
00:27:36.900 If this line is crossed
00:27:40.420 and Trump spends one
00:27:43.180 day in jail, let me
00:27:45.880 tell you, as a male
00:27:47.080 who lives in America,
00:27:49.240 all the rules are
00:27:50.180 gone.
00:27:52.200 That, that, all the
00:27:53.180 rules are gone.
00:27:54.520 One day in jail.
00:27:57.160 And every, every man
00:27:58.940 listening to it knows
00:27:59.840 what I'm saying.
00:28:01.100 Every woman listening to
00:28:02.440 it might know.
00:28:03.080 But you're not part
00:28:04.960 of the conversation.
00:28:07.080 You are not part
00:28:08.200 of the conversation.
00:28:09.660 This is pure
00:28:10.920 male
00:28:12.600 business.
00:28:14.900 Because it's the men
00:28:15.880 who are keeping things
00:28:17.040 from becoming violent
00:28:18.380 by being violent.
00:28:20.280 By being naturally
00:28:21.280 violent.
00:28:21.680 And this is where
00:28:24.060 the men
00:28:24.560 will take complete
00:28:26.300 control
00:28:26.860 of this situation.
00:28:28.980 You'll never know it.
00:28:30.080 You'll never know it.
00:28:32.840 But let me say as
00:28:33.840 clearly as possible.
00:28:35.820 If Trump is jailed
00:28:37.420 for what is obviously
00:28:38.440 just a political
00:28:39.780 act,
00:28:41.820 the rules
00:28:43.060 are gone.
00:28:45.200 So deal with that.
00:28:47.380 Again,
00:28:48.200 I do not promote
00:28:49.120 any kind of violence
00:28:50.020 against anybody
00:28:50.880 for any reason.
00:28:52.760 But if somebody else
00:28:53.920 takes all the rules
00:28:54.860 away,
00:28:55.960 I will play in the
00:28:56.960 new game as
00:28:57.840 vigorously as I can.
00:29:00.960 Right?
00:29:01.960 But no violence.
00:29:05.160 So I'm 100%
00:29:06.620 behind Trump
00:29:07.380 saying that
00:29:08.100 if they come for him
00:29:09.160 in a political trial
00:29:10.720 that there should be
00:29:12.460 no controls
00:29:13.200 on what he does
00:29:14.100 back to them.
00:29:15.400 If Trump were to win,
00:29:17.460 let's say he's in prison,
00:29:19.100 he wins anyway,
00:29:20.560 he pardons himself,
00:29:22.420 I would be completely
00:29:23.560 in favor of him
00:29:24.580 immediately jailing
00:29:25.860 every person
00:29:27.440 who was involved
00:29:28.100 in this.
00:29:28.500 And then let them
00:29:31.320 work it out
00:29:31.820 on their own.
00:29:32.360 Get some lawyers.
00:29:34.400 I mean,
00:29:34.740 whatever it takes.
00:29:36.340 I'd put every
00:29:37.180 fucking one of them
00:29:37.940 in jail.
00:29:38.800 Because you need
00:29:40.100 a credible,
00:29:42.380 mutually assured
00:29:43.320 destruction
00:29:44.020 to keep the
00:29:45.480 republic safe.
00:29:47.720 Right?
00:29:48.320 Everything I'm
00:29:49.040 talking about
00:29:49.540 is to avoid
00:29:50.880 war.
00:29:52.240 Is to avoid
00:29:53.080 civil war.
00:29:53.920 That's all I want.
00:29:54.880 I want to avoid
00:29:55.800 violence.
00:29:56.920 You can't do it
00:29:58.000 by being weak.
00:30:00.460 Everybody knows that.
00:30:02.180 Well,
00:30:02.560 maybe women
00:30:03.040 don't know it.
00:30:04.040 Men know it.
00:30:05.540 Right?
00:30:06.200 Can I get a vote?
00:30:07.300 Every man knows
00:30:08.140 you don't be safe
00:30:09.780 by being nonviolent.
00:30:13.020 That is not
00:30:13.920 the path to safety.
00:30:15.580 100% of men
00:30:16.860 understand that
00:30:17.780 in their DNA.
00:30:20.120 Right?
00:30:20.360 It's not an
00:30:21.340 intellectual argument.
00:30:23.520 There's no
00:30:24.100 thinking involved.
00:30:26.340 Trust us.
00:30:27.660 Trust the men.
00:30:29.780 You need
00:30:30.660 violence
00:30:31.260 to be safe.
00:30:33.760 That's it.
00:30:34.880 There's no
00:30:35.340 argument to that.
00:30:37.120 So,
00:30:38.400 Trump has
00:30:39.200 gone
00:30:40.440 as he does.
00:30:42.520 He's gone
00:30:43.200 through the
00:30:43.780 bullshit.
00:30:44.560 And the
00:30:44.940 bullshit is
00:30:45.700 did he do
00:30:46.160 a crime?
00:30:47.800 That really
00:30:48.600 is just
00:30:48.960 bullshit.
00:30:51.000 Right?
00:30:52.040 What matters
00:30:52.800 is how you're
00:30:53.320 going to feel
00:30:53.720 about it.
00:30:55.420 How you're
00:30:55.780 going to feel
00:30:56.240 about it.
00:30:56.980 And he just
00:30:57.460 told you how
00:30:57.960 he feels
00:30:58.400 about it.
00:30:59.760 So,
00:31:00.340 there you go.
00:31:02.520 So,
00:31:03.040 this is the
00:31:03.460 very definition
00:31:04.020 of too far.
00:31:05.400 And as a
00:31:06.420 public service,
00:31:07.700 give me a
00:31:08.720 little sanity
00:31:10.200 check here.
00:31:12.200 Do you agree
00:31:13.080 with the
00:31:13.440 statement
00:31:13.820 that it
00:31:16.080 keeps the
00:31:17.380 country safe
00:31:18.160 to be as
00:31:19.280 clear as
00:31:19.880 possible
00:31:20.340 about where
00:31:20.940 the boundaries
00:31:21.840 are?
00:31:23.460 Do you
00:31:24.020 agree?
00:31:24.960 This is a
00:31:25.780 boundary
00:31:26.120 question.
00:31:27.780 Right?
00:31:28.060 Putting
00:31:28.280 Trump in
00:31:29.380 jail on a
00:31:30.080 political
00:31:30.480 charge,
00:31:31.560 even if you
00:31:32.400 can make
00:31:32.820 your little
00:31:33.200 argument,
00:31:34.740 your little
00:31:35.260 argument won't
00:31:35.820 have any
00:31:36.340 impact on
00:31:37.020 anything.
00:31:38.120 We don't
00:31:38.600 even want
00:31:38.940 to hear
00:31:39.140 your legal
00:31:39.900 argument.
00:31:41.600 Do you
00:31:42.120 think I
00:31:42.440 would care
00:31:42.880 if the
00:31:44.580 court had a
00:31:45.300 good argument?
00:31:46.340 No.
00:31:46.940 No,
00:31:47.200 that's not
00:31:47.700 in any
00:31:48.740 part of
00:31:49.020 my
00:31:49.160 thinking.
00:31:50.620 This is
00:31:51.820 about a
00:31:52.400 boundary,
00:31:53.440 and this
00:31:54.100 is a
00:31:54.420 solid
00:31:54.660 boundary.
00:31:57.160 If you
00:31:58.380 pass this
00:31:58.960 boundary,
00:31:59.860 there are
00:32:00.540 no rules.
00:32:02.420 You don't
00:32:02.840 want to live
00:32:03.200 in that
00:32:03.460 world,
00:32:04.160 because you
00:32:05.100 know how
00:32:05.380 that goes.
00:32:07.840 All right.
00:32:09.800 You got a
00:32:10.320 little quiet
00:32:10.780 there,
00:32:11.040 didn't you?
00:32:11.340 Meanwhile,
00:32:13.460 in the
00:32:13.800 absurdity
00:32:14.660 Olympics,
00:32:16.040 we've got
00:32:16.400 Secretary
00:32:16.960 Antony
00:32:17.460 Blinken,
00:32:18.100 who said
00:32:18.740 this fucking
00:32:19.360 thing.
00:32:20.440 Just imagine
00:32:21.280 this.
00:32:22.240 This is our
00:32:22.840 government.
00:32:23.360 This is a
00:32:23.780 Democrat.
00:32:25.580 What's he,
00:32:26.160 Secretary of
00:32:26.980 State,
00:32:27.480 right?
00:32:28.140 The United
00:32:28.720 States strongly
00:32:29.480 condemns Russia's
00:32:30.640 conviction of
00:32:31.440 opposition leader
00:32:32.720 Alexei Navalny
00:32:34.440 on politically
00:32:35.580 motivated
00:32:36.580 charges.
00:32:37.400 The Kremlin
00:32:39.780 cannot silence
00:32:41.640 the truth.
00:32:43.360 Navalny
00:32:43.880 should be
00:32:44.400 released.
00:32:47.160 He's actually
00:32:48.080 saying this at
00:32:48.900 the same time
00:32:49.560 that his party
00:32:50.220 is trying to
00:32:50.780 jail Trump on
00:32:51.580 political charges.
00:32:53.480 This is actually
00:32:54.620 happening.
00:32:56.820 This is a
00:32:57.920 real thing
00:32:58.580 that's happening
00:32:59.320 at the same
00:33:00.040 time.
00:33:01.360 This fucking
00:33:02.220 idiot is
00:33:03.480 tweeting this
00:33:04.100 at the same
00:33:04.600 time he's
00:33:05.060 insulting the
00:33:06.660 citizens of
00:33:07.260 the United
00:33:07.560 States by
00:33:08.120 doing the
00:33:08.660 same thing.
00:33:10.200 He's just
00:33:10.980 fucking doing
00:33:11.640 the same
00:33:12.080 thing.
00:33:14.120 Amazing.
00:33:15.900 All right,
00:33:16.440 we'll talk
00:33:16.740 about this a
00:33:17.180 little bit
00:33:17.440 more,
00:33:17.820 but in
00:33:18.440 other news,
00:33:19.440 there's a
00:33:20.080 new pill
00:33:20.520 for postpartum
00:33:21.560 depression.
00:33:24.560 Do you
00:33:25.160 think it
00:33:25.500 works?
00:33:27.860 That's the
00:33:28.460 whole story.
00:33:29.060 There's a
00:33:29.360 new pill
00:33:29.760 for postpartum
00:33:30.680 depression.
00:33:32.200 I say no.
00:33:34.300 Do you
00:33:34.660 know why?
00:33:35.480 Because I
00:33:36.000 don't believe
00:33:36.380 anything.
00:33:37.260 If it's
00:33:39.100 in the
00:33:39.400 news,
00:33:39.740 I just
00:33:40.020 assume it's
00:33:40.560 bullshit.
00:33:42.620 Because the
00:33:43.800 place you go
00:33:44.440 to find lies
00:33:45.200 is the
00:33:45.620 news.
00:33:47.160 I don't
00:33:47.660 believe any
00:33:48.860 medical claim
00:33:50.000 anymore.
00:33:51.500 Literally.
00:33:52.660 Well, I
00:33:53.280 believe that
00:33:53.820 smoking cigarettes
00:33:54.800 causes cancer.
00:33:56.260 But I guess
00:33:57.200 I'm going too
00:33:57.680 far.
00:33:58.340 I don't
00:33:58.940 believe any
00:33:59.320 new medical
00:33:59.960 claim.
00:34:00.340 I don't
00:34:02.940 care who
00:34:03.460 says it.
00:34:04.640 I don't
00:34:04.980 care what
00:34:05.460 the source
00:34:05.840 is.
00:34:06.120 I don't
00:34:06.320 care how
00:34:06.660 they studied
00:34:07.080 it.
00:34:07.340 I don't
00:34:07.560 care if
00:34:07.860 it's a
00:34:08.060 randomized
00:34:08.300 controlled
00:34:08.780 trial.
00:34:10.120 I don't
00:34:10.460 care.
00:34:10.980 I just
00:34:11.500 literally do
00:34:12.220 not believe
00:34:12.680 any medical
00:34:13.280 news.
00:34:15.560 Would I
00:34:16.220 ever be
00:34:16.600 wrong about
00:34:17.140 that?
00:34:17.540 Yes.
00:34:17.920 Yes.
00:34:19.080 Yes.
00:34:20.640 But I
00:34:21.680 didn't get
00:34:22.080 myself to
00:34:22.620 this point.
00:34:23.760 Like, I
00:34:24.120 didn't talk
00:34:24.560 myself into
00:34:25.240 this.
00:34:25.620 this was
00:34:27.680 the outside
00:34:28.200 world beating
00:34:29.900 the shit
00:34:30.520 out of me
00:34:30.980 until I
00:34:31.460 stopped believing
00:34:32.100 things that
00:34:33.640 I shouldn't
00:34:34.040 have believed
00:34:34.340 in the first
00:34:34.780 place.
00:34:36.120 So I
00:34:36.840 hate to
00:34:37.180 say it,
00:34:38.320 but I
00:34:39.700 would never
00:34:40.080 give anybody
00:34:40.680 a new pill
00:34:41.280 for anything.
00:34:43.600 Just for
00:34:44.180 anything.
00:34:46.440 Now, by
00:34:47.100 the way,
00:34:47.640 I'd like you
00:34:48.420 all to
00:34:48.980 follow along
00:34:51.320 as I
00:34:51.780 probably kill
00:34:52.640 myself by
00:34:54.240 ignoring
00:34:56.180 medical
00:34:56.620 advice.
00:34:57.760 I am
00:34:58.440 currently
00:34:58.880 ignoring
00:34:59.440 medical
00:34:59.880 advice in
00:35:00.920 a very
00:35:01.580 aggressive
00:35:02.840 way.
00:35:04.220 So I
00:35:04.900 stopped
00:35:05.160 taking
00:35:05.640 blood
00:35:06.260 pressure
00:35:06.600 medications
00:35:07.280 because I
00:35:09.400 don't believe
00:35:09.840 them.
00:35:10.940 I don't
00:35:11.680 believe it's
00:35:12.100 real.
00:35:13.380 Now, do
00:35:13.840 not take
00:35:15.260 medical
00:35:15.660 advice from
00:35:16.260 me.
00:35:17.420 You should
00:35:17.940 make up your
00:35:18.980 own mind,
00:35:19.600 talk to your
00:35:20.020 doctor.
00:35:21.340 Maybe you
00:35:21.980 belong on
00:35:22.520 blood pressure
00:35:23.020 medications.
00:35:24.240 I'm just
00:35:24.660 telling you
00:35:25.160 that I
00:35:25.980 can find
00:35:26.500 no source
00:35:27.180 of information
00:35:27.840 I would
00:35:28.280 trust,
00:35:29.220 and I'm
00:35:29.500 not even
00:35:29.840 going to
00:35:30.100 look.
00:35:30.920 I'm not
00:35:31.240 even going
00:35:31.540 to look
00:35:31.860 because I
00:35:32.300 know there's
00:35:32.700 no source
00:35:33.160 I would
00:35:33.420 trust.
00:35:34.080 Of course
00:35:34.620 there's
00:35:34.940 going to
00:35:35.120 be tests
00:35:35.600 that say
00:35:35.980 it works.
00:35:37.060 Of course
00:35:37.460 there are.
00:35:39.220 What's that
00:35:39.720 tell me?
00:35:40.620 Nothing.
00:35:42.140 In 2023,
00:35:43.660 there's a
00:35:44.400 whole bunch
00:35:44.800 of science
00:35:45.320 that says
00:35:45.760 these pills
00:35:46.320 will keep
00:35:46.780 you alive.
00:35:47.620 That doesn't
00:35:48.020 mean anything.
00:35:49.300 I wish
00:35:49.840 it did.
00:35:51.040 I would
00:35:51.560 love to
00:35:51.900 tell you,
00:35:52.820 oh, I
00:35:53.260 know I'm
00:35:53.640 being a
00:35:54.000 science
00:35:54.340 denier
00:35:54.800 now, but
00:35:56.160 I'm probably
00:35:56.720 killing some
00:35:57.660 of you.
00:35:58.800 I mean,
00:35:59.140 literally, I'm
00:35:59.640 probably killing
00:36:00.260 several of
00:36:00.820 you right
00:36:01.120 now, because
00:36:02.180 there's somebody
00:36:02.600 out there who's
00:36:03.100 going to say,
00:36:03.440 you know, he's
00:36:03.940 making a good
00:36:04.440 point.
00:36:05.180 I'll throw
00:36:05.640 away my
00:36:06.040 blood pressure
00:36:06.520 medicine, then
00:36:07.100 I'll die.
00:36:07.900 Don't do
00:36:08.420 what I'm
00:36:08.740 doing.
00:36:09.800 This is not
00:36:10.540 a conversation
00:36:11.160 about medicine.
00:36:13.000 I'm telling
00:36:13.420 you my state
00:36:14.060 of mind,
00:36:15.080 right?
00:36:15.340 So you
00:36:16.300 should not
00:36:16.720 adopt my
00:36:17.440 state of
00:36:17.900 mind, and
00:36:18.920 you should
00:36:19.140 make your
00:36:19.480 own medical
00:36:19.920 decisions.
00:36:20.820 Do not
00:36:21.420 discontinue any
00:36:22.480 medications because
00:36:23.280 you heard the
00:36:23.860 cartoonist say
00:36:24.480 so, okay?
00:36:27.220 Although I
00:36:27.900 think I already
00:36:28.360 went too far
00:36:28.960 on that.
00:36:30.400 Sometimes I
00:36:31.160 forget how
00:36:31.700 persuasive I
00:36:32.500 can be.
00:36:33.500 Don't stop
00:36:34.200 taking your
00:36:34.740 medications because
00:36:35.600 you heard me
00:36:36.180 say it, okay?
00:36:37.540 Please, please
00:36:38.920 don't stop your
00:36:39.760 medications.
00:36:41.620 Please don't do
00:36:42.720 that.
00:36:43.060 I don't
00:36:44.260 want to kill
00:36:44.660 anybody today.
00:36:46.000 It's only a
00:36:47.000 conversation about
00:36:47.760 my state of
00:36:48.440 mind, okay?
00:36:52.200 All right.
00:36:55.820 Greg
00:36:56.360 Gottfeld had
00:36:57.000 a great take
00:36:58.820 on how all
00:36:59.580 of our
00:36:59.920 institutions are
00:37:01.100 corrupt, except
00:37:03.580 the elections.
00:37:05.340 Everything in
00:37:06.020 the world from
00:37:06.580 the Department
00:37:07.140 of Justice to
00:37:08.080 the financial
00:37:09.240 world to the
00:37:10.140 political world,
00:37:11.480 it's all proven
00:37:12.760 to be corrupt,
00:37:13.620 but those
00:37:14.220 elections are
00:37:14.860 good.
00:37:17.120 He, of
00:37:17.720 course, got
00:37:18.120 some pushback
00:37:18.800 on that, and
00:37:20.800 so I thought
00:37:21.520 I'd back him a
00:37:22.160 little bit on
00:37:22.640 that, so I
00:37:23.160 tweeted that
00:37:24.540 uncertainty is
00:37:25.380 the only smart
00:37:26.200 take when
00:37:27.820 every other
00:37:28.420 American system
00:37:29.460 has been
00:37:29.980 demonstrated to
00:37:30.800 be corrupt.
00:37:33.040 In my opinion,
00:37:34.180 the people who
00:37:34.640 say the election
00:37:35.220 was rigged and
00:37:36.120 the people who
00:37:36.620 say the election
00:37:37.220 was not rigged
00:37:37.960 are the same
00:37:38.400 people.
00:37:39.980 To me, they
00:37:40.580 look the same.
00:37:41.160 It's two
00:37:42.240 people who
00:37:42.700 have certainty
00:37:43.320 in a domain
00:37:44.440 in which
00:37:44.820 certainty is
00:37:45.480 absurd.
00:37:46.700 It's absurd
00:37:47.460 to be certain
00:37:48.060 it was true.
00:37:49.140 It's absurd
00:37:49.760 to say that
00:37:50.320 you know it
00:37:50.740 was fixed,
00:37:51.880 unless you
00:37:52.880 have some
00:37:53.200 evidence I
00:37:53.720 haven't seen.
00:37:54.720 And it's
00:37:55.100 absurd to
00:37:56.180 say that it
00:37:56.620 wasn't.
00:37:57.480 How would
00:37:57.820 we know?
00:37:59.220 So the two
00:38:00.060 ridiculous opinions
00:38:01.280 are that it
00:38:02.180 was rigged or
00:38:02.920 that it
00:38:03.200 wasn't.
00:38:03.800 Those are
00:38:04.140 ridiculous
00:38:04.620 opinions.
00:38:06.280 And by the
00:38:07.780 way, the 81
00:38:08.380 million votes
00:38:09.040 part is the
00:38:09.660 worst part of
00:38:10.180 the argument.
00:38:11.300 Let me stop.
00:38:12.800 It embarrasses
00:38:13.580 me when I
00:38:14.040 hear that,
00:38:14.780 honestly.
00:38:16.060 Kind of
00:38:16.380 embarrasses me
00:38:17.140 to be kind
00:38:17.900 of associated
00:38:18.500 with that
00:38:18.900 argument.
00:38:20.260 The 81
00:38:20.900 million can
00:38:21.580 be explained
00:38:22.200 entirely by
00:38:23.960 the fact that
00:38:25.040 eight years
00:38:26.140 had passed,
00:38:26.900 or a number
00:38:27.840 of years had
00:38:28.300 passed, the
00:38:29.160 population is
00:38:29.960 larger, and
00:38:31.520 the candidate
00:38:32.580 running was
00:38:33.180 Trump, and
00:38:34.440 the news had
00:38:35.100 an unprecedented
00:38:36.000 opinion on
00:38:37.880 Trump.
00:38:38.200 Trump, every
00:38:39.400 indicator suggests
00:38:40.460 that it should
00:38:41.060 have been record
00:38:41.600 voting.
00:38:42.920 Every indicator
00:38:43.760 suggests it
00:38:44.380 should have
00:38:44.780 been record
00:38:45.200 voting, and
00:38:46.380 we got record
00:38:46.940 voting.
00:38:47.820 That is the
00:38:48.640 weakest argument
00:38:49.400 for a fraud.
00:38:51.360 By far, that's
00:38:52.260 the weakest.
00:38:53.220 That one is just
00:38:54.120 embarrassing,
00:38:54.900 honestly.
00:38:56.020 Now, I get
00:38:56.560 that it's sort of
00:38:57.280 the bumper sticker
00:38:58.100 view, and keep
00:38:59.960 in mind, I'm not
00:39:00.680 saying the
00:39:01.060 election was
00:39:01.700 fair.
00:39:03.320 I'm also not
00:39:04.040 saying it was
00:39:04.520 unfair.
00:39:05.680 I'm saying the
00:39:06.260 81 million is
00:39:07.180 the weakest
00:39:07.880 argument for
00:39:09.560 evidence it
00:39:10.200 was unfair.
00:39:11.880 The second
00:39:12.440 weakest argument
00:39:13.260 is that the
00:39:14.600 votes switched
00:39:15.520 from Trump
00:39:16.900 being ahead to
00:39:18.180 Democrats being
00:39:19.160 ahead, completely
00:39:20.560 explained by the
00:39:21.780 fact that
00:39:22.340 Republicans vote
00:39:23.440 in person, and
00:39:24.720 then ballots from
00:39:26.260 Democrats come in
00:39:27.160 later.
00:39:28.340 Now, I don't
00:39:29.180 know if that's
00:39:29.700 true, but it
00:39:31.720 is an
00:39:32.320 explanation which
00:39:33.260 fits the facts.
00:39:35.320 So, your
00:39:36.080 weakest argument
00:39:36.940 is that there
00:39:39.100 was a sudden
00:39:39.620 change in the
00:39:40.260 voting.
00:39:40.880 That's really
00:39:41.560 weak.
00:39:42.740 And the other
00:39:43.220 one is that a
00:39:44.020 lot of people
00:39:44.480 voted in the
00:39:45.520 most controversial
00:39:46.360 election of all
00:39:47.760 time.
00:39:48.440 Of course a lot
00:39:49.460 of people voted.
00:39:51.060 If it wasn't a
00:39:52.080 record, that would
00:39:52.820 have been the
00:39:53.180 strange thing.
00:39:54.320 Wouldn't it be
00:39:54.760 more strange if
00:39:55.720 it wasn't a
00:39:56.300 record?
00:39:58.160 Right?
00:39:58.720 So, and let
00:40:01.140 me say again,
00:40:01.720 as clearly as
00:40:02.420 possible.
00:40:04.820 Is it possible
00:40:05.820 that the 81
00:40:06.580 million is a
00:40:07.420 fraudulent
00:40:07.880 number?
00:40:09.600 Yeah, absolutely.
00:40:10.820 How would I
00:40:11.280 know?
00:40:12.020 Absolutely.
00:40:13.040 It's possible.
00:40:14.700 Is it a strong
00:40:16.060 indication that it
00:40:17.020 was rigged because
00:40:17.840 of the 81
00:40:18.420 million?
00:40:18.880 No, that's a
00:40:19.520 terrible, terrible
00:40:20.220 argument.
00:40:21.580 I think you
00:40:22.480 could only have
00:40:22.940 that argument if
00:40:23.620 you're really
00:40:24.080 locked in the
00:40:24.700 bubble.
00:40:25.700 If you spend a
00:40:26.740 minute outside the
00:40:27.520 bubble, that falls
00:40:28.400 apart right away.
00:40:29.180 Now, again, I
00:40:31.400 do think there
00:40:33.100 are arguments
00:40:33.860 about the
00:40:34.540 election that
00:40:35.420 might be strong.
00:40:36.980 Might be.
00:40:38.680 You know, I'd
00:40:39.860 have to look into
00:40:40.520 them.
00:40:41.440 There might be.
00:40:42.540 But it's not
00:40:43.040 those two.
00:40:44.100 You actually hurt
00:40:44.980 yourself when you
00:40:45.780 make either of
00:40:46.340 those claims.
00:40:47.600 Because if you
00:40:48.500 make those claims
00:40:49.220 outside the
00:40:49.880 bubble, the
00:40:51.340 people outside the
00:40:52.520 bubble know that
00:40:53.100 those are the
00:40:53.520 weakest claims.
00:40:54.280 So if you
00:40:56.340 want to make
00:40:57.200 the people
00:40:57.660 outside the
00:40:58.480 bubble agree
00:40:59.220 with you, don't
00:41:00.160 use those.
00:41:01.880 Those are only
00:41:02.700 inside the
00:41:03.300 bubble, hey, I
00:41:04.820 agree with your
00:41:05.420 bumper sticker kind
00:41:06.320 of thing.
00:41:07.500 I actually laugh
00:41:08.660 when I see the
00:41:09.240 81 million stuff.
00:41:10.600 When the 81
00:41:11.220 million is in a
00:41:11.940 meme, I think
00:41:12.800 it's great.
00:41:13.700 I laugh.
00:41:15.000 But don't take
00:41:15.760 that seriously.
00:41:17.200 It was the most
00:41:18.380 controversial election.
00:41:19.460 Of course, the
00:41:20.540 numbers were
00:41:21.020 through the roof.
00:41:21.600 Some of them
00:41:24.060 might have been
00:41:24.420 fake.
00:41:25.100 I don't know.
00:41:26.360 Who knows?
00:41:27.480 So anyway, here's
00:41:28.960 what I said.
00:41:31.100 I said that
00:41:31.900 Gottfeld found
00:41:32.540 the high ground
00:41:33.760 here.
00:41:34.980 And now, in
00:41:35.660 theory, what
00:41:36.160 happens if you
00:41:36.920 have two arguments
00:41:37.880 that are
00:41:39.180 irrational, and
00:41:41.100 then somebody
00:41:41.660 gives you the
00:41:42.300 rational argument?
00:41:44.260 What happens to
00:41:45.040 the people who
00:41:45.520 have the
00:41:45.860 irrational takes?
00:41:47.440 So the
00:41:47.860 irrational ones
00:41:48.660 are that you
00:41:49.060 know there was
00:41:50.900 no fraud.
00:41:51.600 or also that
00:41:52.820 you know there
00:41:53.500 was.
00:41:56.280 Cognitive
00:41:56.920 dissonance,
00:41:57.400 right?
00:41:57.760 So the
00:41:58.140 predictable outcome
00:41:58.960 should be
00:41:59.340 cognitive dissonance.
00:42:00.600 So this is one
00:42:01.400 of those places
00:42:02.160 in nature where
00:42:03.560 you get to
00:42:04.360 learn what
00:42:04.840 cognitive dissonance
00:42:05.880 looks like.
00:42:08.440 So here's an
00:42:10.020 example.
00:42:12.260 Somebody tweeted
00:42:13.540 immediately after
00:42:14.560 Greg's tweet,
00:42:16.200 it's unprovable,
00:42:17.860 all in caps,
00:42:18.640 unprovable.
00:42:19.540 So the
00:42:20.540 burden of
00:42:21.000 proof is on
00:42:21.620 you, Greg.
00:42:23.500 In other words,
00:42:24.860 somebody saying,
00:42:25.900 oh, nice try,
00:42:27.280 you election
00:42:27.800 denier, but
00:42:29.180 it's unprovable
00:42:30.240 that the
00:42:31.880 burden of
00:42:35.400 proof has to
00:42:35.920 be on you.
00:42:36.860 Now, is that
00:42:37.440 cognitive dissonance?
00:42:40.220 Yes, it is.
00:42:42.280 Because it's not
00:42:43.320 even on the
00:42:43.840 same topic.
00:42:44.380 This is
00:42:45.860 somebody who
00:42:46.340 had to
00:42:46.680 imagine that
00:42:48.080 Greg said the
00:42:48.980 election was
00:42:49.800 rigged.
00:42:50.340 He didn't say
00:42:50.840 that.
00:42:51.620 He's never
00:42:51.980 said that.
00:42:53.160 Have you ever
00:42:53.820 heard him say
00:42:54.320 that?
00:42:55.260 Nope.
00:42:56.280 Not once.
00:42:57.900 Not once.
00:42:59.340 Never said it.
00:43:01.060 In fact, he said
00:43:02.180 literally the
00:43:02.760 opposite.
00:43:03.700 He said there's
00:43:04.260 no way to know
00:43:04.940 either way.
00:43:06.760 Right?
00:43:07.160 And the very
00:43:07.860 first comment,
00:43:09.160 it's unprovable,
00:43:10.460 so the burden of
00:43:11.160 proof is on you.
00:43:12.660 In other words,
00:43:13.380 somebody imagined
00:43:14.280 they saw an
00:43:14.860 election denier,
00:43:16.460 and that was
00:43:16.840 the opposite of
00:43:17.460 what they saw.
00:43:19.520 Right?
00:43:20.200 So if you look
00:43:20.840 at the other
00:43:21.160 comments, if you
00:43:21.940 want to learn
00:43:22.300 what cognitive
00:43:23.000 dissonance looks
00:43:23.840 like, this is a
00:43:25.020 perfect one.
00:43:26.060 Because there is
00:43:26.660 no argument with,
00:43:28.240 I mean, there's
00:43:28.640 no rational
00:43:29.200 argument with,
00:43:30.800 we can't know.
00:43:32.660 There's no rational
00:43:33.620 person who argues
00:43:34.640 that point.
00:43:35.880 It's only irrational
00:43:37.060 people who are
00:43:37.600 going to debate
00:43:38.040 that.
00:43:39.880 All right.
00:43:42.000 Elon Musk, not
00:43:44.580 too happy with
00:43:45.220 the New York
00:43:45.600 Times today.
00:43:47.060 You know the
00:43:47.600 story about the
00:43:48.880 political party in
00:43:50.440 South Africa that
00:43:52.100 was chanting or
00:43:53.580 singing the song
00:43:54.460 Kill the Boar,
00:43:56.060 which apparently
00:43:56.800 is, you know,
00:43:57.840 the boars are the
00:43:58.500 white people.
00:43:59.680 And so the news
00:44:00.780 about that was,
00:44:03.040 oh no, these
00:44:03.820 racists are saying
00:44:04.940 kill the white
00:44:05.500 people.
00:44:06.480 This should be
00:44:07.020 stopped.
00:44:07.820 Well, as Elon
00:44:08.840 Musk points out,
00:44:09.620 the New York
00:44:10.820 Times decided to
00:44:12.340 back the people
00:44:13.260 who were chanting
00:44:14.220 Kill the White
00:44:15.040 People.
00:44:16.980 Seriously.
00:44:20.140 Seriously.
00:44:22.740 And their
00:44:23.460 explanation is
00:44:24.360 that it's really
00:44:25.060 just a, it's an
00:44:26.360 old anti-apartheid
00:44:29.400 chant, and of
00:44:30.020 course you don't
00:44:30.840 like apartheid,
00:44:32.040 right?
00:44:32.620 Nobody likes
00:44:33.380 apartheid, so you
00:44:35.000 would consider
00:44:35.620 yourself anti-apartheid
00:44:37.280 just like them.
00:44:38.180 So they are just
00:44:39.760 you, basically.
00:44:40.600 They're anti-apartheid,
00:44:41.940 you're anti-apartheid,
00:44:43.260 they have a song,
00:44:45.600 it's just an
00:44:46.300 anti-apartheid song,
00:44:47.440 Kill the White
00:44:47.880 People.
00:44:49.020 So I think you
00:44:50.660 should be way
00:44:51.140 less excited or
00:44:52.360 concerned that in
00:44:54.500 the context of
00:44:55.540 them actually,
00:44:57.080 them, at least in
00:44:58.060 the country, a lot
00:44:59.520 of white people
00:45:00.040 being killed for
00:45:01.160 being white, that
00:45:02.900 there would be
00:45:03.660 somebody who's a
00:45:04.880 major political
00:45:05.600 party, all black,
00:45:07.620 it looks like,
00:45:08.380 from the pictures,
00:45:09.680 chanting, kill the
00:45:10.920 white people, the
00:45:11.860 boars.
00:45:13.420 And so the
00:45:14.340 New York Times
00:45:15.580 decided to side
00:45:16.720 with the people
00:45:18.060 chanting, kill the
00:45:19.020 white people.
00:45:20.600 And when I say
00:45:21.620 side with them, I
00:45:22.380 mean, just
00:45:23.040 described it as
00:45:23.860 not a big deal,
00:45:24.920 it's just an old
00:45:25.620 song.
00:45:26.640 Don't worry about
00:45:27.460 the old song.
00:45:29.000 Yeah.
00:45:30.140 Yeah.
00:45:30.580 I wonder if they
00:45:31.220 say the same about
00:45:32.060 the, I'm not going
00:45:33.540 to go there,
00:45:33.960 third rail, foot,
00:45:39.140 third rail.
00:45:40.600 Let's keep it off
00:45:41.560 at the moment.
00:45:43.720 So Musk says,
00:45:45.880 Musk tweets, the
00:45:46.880 New York Times
00:45:47.460 actually has the
00:45:48.240 nerve to support
00:45:49.580 calls for genocide.
00:45:52.180 If ever there was a
00:45:53.320 time to cancel that
00:45:54.200 publication, it is
00:45:55.260 now.
00:45:56.100 And then he says,
00:45:56.840 you can read their
00:45:57.720 articles for free
00:45:58.600 anyway.
00:45:59.020 and he gives
00:45:59.960 the, he gives
00:46:01.840 the remove
00:46:02.540 paywall.com
00:46:03.780 URL.
00:46:08.320 By the way, I
00:46:09.020 didn't know about
00:46:09.500 that.
00:46:10.120 So you can read
00:46:10.820 the New York
00:46:11.300 Times for free,
00:46:12.360 I guess.
00:46:14.800 And I plan to do
00:46:15.980 just that if I ever
00:46:17.060 have to look at
00:46:17.740 that rag.
00:46:19.220 So I thought I'd
00:46:20.640 run a poll since
00:46:22.360 it would seem that
00:46:23.020 the New York
00:46:23.380 Times is siding
00:46:25.400 aggressively with
00:46:26.380 racists, murderous
00:46:28.100 racists.
00:46:29.020 That's what it
00:46:29.700 seems like.
00:46:31.000 I thought, I
00:46:32.240 wonder how other
00:46:32.940 people think.
00:46:33.500 So I ran a little
00:46:34.040 poll on Twitter and
00:46:35.440 I asked this
00:46:35.980 question, who is
00:46:36.900 more racist, the
00:46:38.340 New York Times or
00:46:39.200 me?
00:46:41.580 And as you know,
00:46:43.400 I'm one of the
00:46:43.940 most famous racists
00:46:44.880 there is.
00:46:46.060 It's true.
00:46:46.720 Do you know why
00:46:47.040 it's true?
00:46:48.360 The New York
00:46:48.820 Times said so.
00:46:50.220 Yeah.
00:46:50.640 Yeah, the New York
00:46:51.240 Times said so.
00:46:52.360 So it's got to be
00:46:52.920 true, right?
00:46:53.600 The Washington
00:46:54.040 Post said so too.
00:46:57.140 Well, it's got to
00:46:58.400 be true.
00:46:59.580 It's the
00:46:59.880 Washington Post and
00:47:00.720 the New York
00:47:01.000 Times said it.
00:47:02.760 Must be true.
00:47:03.800 So I thought I
00:47:04.420 would test how much
00:47:05.800 of a racist I am,
00:47:07.600 according to the
00:47:08.460 public.
00:47:09.420 And so when I
00:47:10.920 compared myself
00:47:11.580 against the New
00:47:12.140 York Times for
00:47:12.860 who's the biggest
00:47:13.360 racist, 95% said
00:47:15.560 the New York Times
00:47:16.300 was a bigger racist
00:47:17.200 than me.
00:47:18.180 So I'm going to
00:47:18.920 have to up my
00:47:19.440 game a little bit.
00:47:20.980 I was only able to
00:47:22.140 capture 95% of the
00:47:23.640 public.
00:47:24.560 But I think I can do
00:47:25.440 better.
00:47:25.700 The New York
00:47:27.080 Times, though, is
00:47:27.720 killing me in this.
00:47:28.980 All right.
00:47:29.380 So I've said before
00:47:30.540 that I disagree with
00:47:32.780 boycotts.
00:47:34.640 I generally don't
00:47:35.660 like them.
00:47:36.560 I don't think I
00:47:37.380 would have done the
00:47:37.940 Bud Light boycott,
00:47:39.160 frankly.
00:47:40.100 Although I have to
00:47:40.840 admit it worked.
00:47:41.540 From a political
00:47:43.840 standpoint, totally
00:47:45.160 worked.
00:47:46.420 Can I say that
00:47:47.280 without any
00:47:47.900 ambiguity?
00:47:50.040 The Bud Light
00:47:51.020 boycott completely
00:47:53.420 worked.
00:47:54.480 You don't think that
00:47:55.500 that caused other
00:47:57.000 companies to say,
00:47:58.040 whoop, whoop,
00:47:58.540 whoop, back off.
00:48:00.900 Of course it did.
00:48:02.260 Of course it did.
00:48:04.040 Completely worked.
00:48:05.460 Now, the problem
00:48:06.120 with boycotts is not
00:48:07.200 that they don't work.
00:48:09.340 Boycotts can work.
00:48:10.360 I just don't like
00:48:11.820 them, because
00:48:12.320 everybody will start
00:48:13.080 boycotting everybody.
00:48:14.860 Do you see the
00:48:15.340 point?
00:48:16.100 You know, as soon
00:48:18.100 as it becomes the
00:48:18.860 go-to tool, then all
00:48:21.440 the left will be
00:48:22.340 boycotted by the
00:48:23.220 right, and the
00:48:24.000 right will be
00:48:24.520 boycotted by the
00:48:25.280 left.
00:48:25.820 And it's a very big
00:48:26.680 drag on the free
00:48:28.780 market.
00:48:30.300 Right?
00:48:30.640 Now, presumably,
00:48:31.760 there would be a
00:48:32.360 7-11 for
00:48:34.000 conservatives, and
00:48:35.000 someday a 7-11 for
00:48:36.800 just progressives.
00:48:38.460 Maybe.
00:48:39.140 Maybe the free
00:48:39.920 market could work
00:48:40.640 it out.
00:48:41.120 But I don't need
00:48:41.720 two 7-11s.
00:48:43.440 I'm quite happy
00:48:44.560 shopping in the
00:48:45.320 7-11 with people
00:48:47.120 who disagree with
00:48:47.980 me politically.
00:48:49.960 So I don't want
00:48:50.900 the economy destroyed
00:48:51.960 by a bunch of
00:48:52.520 boycotts.
00:48:53.720 However, I'm going
00:48:55.320 to make an
00:48:55.680 exception on this
00:48:56.440 one, because if
00:48:58.280 they're backing
00:48:58.780 people calling for
00:48:59.900 my murder, I
00:49:01.420 think that might be
00:49:03.540 a line that's too
00:49:04.300 far.
00:49:05.300 Too far.
00:49:06.040 Yeah, a little
00:49:07.500 bit too far.
00:49:08.580 Now, I understand
00:49:09.520 the argument that
00:49:10.420 it's an old song,
00:49:11.540 and it should not
00:49:12.480 be taken literally.
00:49:14.340 That's a stupid
00:49:15.180 fucking argument.
00:49:17.740 Right?
00:49:18.580 That's like saying
00:49:19.300 you could use the
00:49:20.000 N-word because,
00:49:20.860 well, it's just
00:49:21.340 a historical word.
00:49:22.300 Nobody means it
00:49:22.920 seriously.
00:49:23.800 You couldn't
00:49:24.320 possibly think we're
00:49:25.200 using this in any
00:49:25.980 kind of a racist
00:49:27.140 way.
00:49:27.920 It's just the old
00:49:28.780 way we used to
00:49:29.540 talk.
00:49:30.140 I just thought it'd
00:49:30.900 be ironic if I
00:49:31.780 talked in the old
00:49:32.500 way for a while.
00:49:33.800 Oh, no, it's just,
00:49:34.800 oh, no, no, it's
00:49:36.820 an anti-slavery
00:49:38.180 word.
00:49:39.280 No, when I use the
00:49:40.560 N-word, what I mean
00:49:41.600 is I'm opposed to
00:49:43.580 slavery.
00:49:45.660 All right, this is
00:49:46.440 a stupid argument,
00:49:47.240 a stupid analogy.
00:49:48.960 So, yes, the New
00:49:49.800 York Times, I think,
00:49:51.120 deserves to be
00:49:51.840 completely out of
00:49:52.480 business.
00:49:53.940 This is way over
00:49:54.980 the line.
00:49:56.560 You can't call for
00:49:57.620 genocide against
00:49:58.420 white people, even
00:49:59.840 in your weird little
00:50:00.780 indirect way where
00:50:01.820 you're saying you're
00:50:02.440 not, because they
00:50:03.820 are, in effect.
00:50:05.800 They're basically
00:50:06.600 putting a little,
00:50:08.420 let's say, a little
00:50:11.000 coat of respectability
00:50:12.900 to the call for
00:50:14.460 white genocide.
00:50:18.380 Nope, you do not
00:50:19.760 get it.
00:50:20.460 So now they have to
00:50:21.900 go out of business.
00:50:22.820 New York Times has
00:50:23.440 to be put out of
00:50:24.080 business.
00:50:25.320 One way or the
00:50:26.060 other.
00:50:26.740 That's got to
00:50:27.320 happen now.
00:50:27.760 All right, Ellen
00:50:30.900 Dershowitz said the
00:50:31.780 scariest thing you've
00:50:33.140 ever heard in your
00:50:33.920 life, an opinion
00:50:35.800 about the Trump
00:50:36.680 legal problems.
00:50:37.900 He said that Trump
00:50:39.260 will probably be
00:50:40.440 convicted, and
00:50:42.280 probably the first
00:50:44.020 appeals court would
00:50:44.920 uphold it, and
00:50:46.760 then almost certainly
00:50:48.020 the Supreme Court
00:50:49.440 would throw it out.
00:50:51.300 What do you hear
00:50:52.440 when you hear that?
00:50:53.500 Now you might hear,
00:50:57.560 oh, it'll all be
00:50:58.420 okay, you know, if
00:51:00.640 you're an optimist.
00:51:01.500 Oh, it'll all be
00:51:02.060 okay.
00:51:02.440 In the end, Supreme
00:51:04.020 Court will throw it
00:51:04.820 out.
00:51:05.760 Trump will spend zero
00:51:06.860 time in jail.
00:51:07.840 There will be no
00:51:08.500 convictions.
00:51:09.580 We go on with their
00:51:10.620 lives.
00:51:11.000 It could happen.
00:51:12.160 It could happen just
00:51:13.120 the way he laid it
00:51:14.180 out.
00:51:14.360 I think it will,
00:51:14.960 actually.
00:51:15.560 That's the most
00:51:16.160 likely outcome.
00:51:17.800 Most likely outcome.
00:51:19.700 But isn't there
00:51:20.820 something we're
00:51:21.420 accepting as okay?
00:51:23.500 At what point did
00:51:25.540 we start talking
00:51:26.500 casually about the
00:51:28.400 fact there's no
00:51:29.180 reasonable chance
00:51:31.380 that the D.C.
00:51:33.480 courts would rule
00:51:35.680 fairly?
00:51:37.120 We're actually
00:51:37.920 talking about the
00:51:39.220 courts prosecuting
00:51:41.840 him for political
00:51:42.880 reasons, and we're
00:51:44.540 talking about that
00:51:45.360 like that's just a
00:51:46.440 normal thing.
00:51:47.880 Oh, yeah, but that
00:51:48.640 will get reversed in
00:51:49.500 the Supreme Court.
00:51:50.260 How in the world did
00:51:53.460 we start talking
00:51:54.400 about the courts not
00:51:56.120 functioning in America
00:51:57.300 because that's what it
00:51:58.260 would be.
00:51:58.820 It would be not
00:51:59.460 functioning.
00:52:00.680 How did we talk about
00:52:02.140 that matter-of-factly?
00:52:04.760 Where did that come
00:52:06.040 from?
00:52:06.940 How about that's the
00:52:07.660 biggest fucking problem
00:52:08.680 in the world?
00:52:09.580 Because the only thing
00:52:10.740 that keeps the entire
00:52:11.700 planet from burning is
00:52:14.480 that some countries like
00:52:15.780 the United States have a
00:52:17.820 justice system that is
00:52:20.720 credible most of the
00:52:22.660 time.
00:52:24.760 As soon as we take it
00:52:26.340 for granted that the
00:52:28.180 D.C., you know, the
00:52:29.420 heart of power, the
00:52:31.320 most important courts
00:52:32.400 would be where your
00:52:33.420 heart of power is,
00:52:34.260 right?
00:52:35.440 As soon as we take it
00:52:36.540 for granted that they're
00:52:37.440 not a functioning real
00:52:38.560 court, that's a
00:52:41.420 problem.
00:52:43.300 Don't you think that
00:52:44.480 we need some kind of a
00:52:46.920 martial law to replace
00:52:48.640 the courts in D.C.?
00:52:50.820 Don't you think we need
00:52:53.240 perhaps a constitutional
00:52:57.820 amendment that says that
00:53:00.320 you can't be tried in
00:53:01.380 Washington, D.C.?
00:53:02.820 I'd be in favor of that.
00:53:04.880 I would be in favor of
00:53:05.800 saying that it is illegal
00:53:07.000 to be tried for any crime
00:53:08.580 in Washington, D.C.
00:53:09.860 because it becomes
00:53:10.800 political.
00:53:12.360 Now, maybe you could
00:53:13.620 separate the politically
00:53:15.240 oriented crimes from the
00:53:17.280 regular crimes.
00:53:19.040 Yeah, that makes sense.
00:53:20.200 But there should be a law
00:53:21.160 that says all, no
00:53:23.260 politician can be tried in
00:53:24.880 Washington, D.C.
00:53:26.740 It shouldn't even be an
00:53:27.860 option.
00:53:29.360 And I think Vivek, you
00:53:30.880 know, this sounds like a
00:53:31.680 Vivek kind of a thing,
00:53:33.100 because he's the only one
00:53:34.220 bold enough to recommend
00:53:35.980 changes that we all know
00:53:37.520 we need.
00:53:38.500 And by the way, this should
00:53:39.460 be, you know, if there's
00:53:41.480 somewhere else like
00:53:42.480 Washington, D.C., I'd say
00:53:44.540 the same thing, right?
00:53:46.260 It's not about Washington,
00:53:47.280 D.C.
00:53:47.740 If you've got a place, let
00:53:50.640 me just summarize.
00:53:52.360 If one of the most
00:53:53.700 eminent lawyers in the
00:53:56.660 United States, Alan
00:53:57.680 Dershowitz, can say
00:53:59.460 matter-of-factly that the
00:54:01.820 first and maybe even the
00:54:03.160 second ruling will be
00:54:05.360 unfair by design, unfair
00:54:09.120 and we all know it, unfair
00:54:11.660 and everybody can see it?
00:54:13.880 So much so that the
00:54:15.200 Supreme Court will
00:54:15.920 certainly overturn it?
00:54:19.720 You know, maybe you
00:54:20.720 should be worried that you
00:54:21.620 know what the Supreme
00:54:22.480 Court will do.
00:54:24.260 Let's turn this around for
00:54:25.540 a minute.
00:54:26.660 How did we design a
00:54:27.820 system where you know in
00:54:29.220 advance what the Supreme
00:54:30.280 Court will do?
00:54:30.980 Because you kind of do.
00:54:32.900 Now, in this case, I'm just
00:54:34.680 happy about it, that that
00:54:36.300 would be a backstop for the
00:54:37.640 worst-case scenario.
00:54:38.500 But you could easily see,
00:54:42.880 you could easily imagine
00:54:45.680 that the Supreme Court
00:54:47.160 looks illegitimate from the
00:54:49.860 perspective of the left
00:54:51.480 because the left also can
00:54:53.640 predict what the Supreme
00:54:55.320 Court will do.
00:54:56.480 If you can predict what
00:54:57.860 they'll do, I'm not entirely
00:55:00.220 sure that's a real court.
00:55:03.680 I mean, again, I'm happy that
00:55:05.600 it's conservative-dominated
00:55:07.080 because even though I
00:55:08.440 personally am left of
00:55:10.440 Bernie, I don't want my
00:55:12.840 court to be making shit
00:55:14.020 up.
00:55:15.660 I don't want them to make
00:55:16.780 stuff up.
00:55:17.960 I want them to, you know,
00:55:19.100 try to, like, follow the
00:55:20.780 rules and stuff.
00:55:22.020 So that, you know, that
00:55:23.580 suggests a conservative
00:55:24.680 court.
00:55:25.720 But that has nothing to do
00:55:26.960 with left or right.
00:55:28.600 You know, the left should
00:55:29.840 want a conservative court, in
00:55:31.980 my opinion.
00:55:32.480 But, obviously, that's a rare
00:55:34.920 opinion on the left.
00:55:37.240 All right.
00:55:38.020 So, that's the most
00:55:39.420 alarming thing, that we
00:55:40.480 just talk about that like
00:55:41.620 it's nothing.
00:55:43.260 All right.
00:55:45.220 I saw a Michael Shermer
00:55:47.400 tweet.
00:55:49.320 I guess Joe Rogan was
00:55:50.860 interviewing one of the
00:55:51.920 pilots that saw the
00:55:53.140 Tic Tac UFO.
00:55:55.300 And that same pilot who
00:55:56.780 reported the Tic Tac UFO,
00:56:00.160 there's probably more than
00:56:01.220 one, I guess, admits to
00:56:04.040 hoaxing UFOs and gave
00:56:09.080 details about how he did
00:56:10.320 it.
00:56:11.700 So, the way he'd do it
00:56:13.020 was, I guess, they would
00:56:17.340 try to convince campers
00:56:18.820 that they saw a UFO because
00:56:20.600 there's a way he could do
00:56:21.800 something with his jet that
00:56:24.140 from the ground would look
00:56:25.520 like something impossible
00:56:27.440 had happened.
00:56:28.360 In other words, he could
00:56:29.200 create the illusion that
00:56:31.680 the physics had been
00:56:33.200 violated because of an
00:56:35.180 optical illusion at night
00:56:36.620 in how he flies his
00:56:38.260 plane.
00:56:40.120 Yeah, I guess turning off
00:56:41.040 the lights or something.
00:56:41.940 I don't know.
00:56:42.840 So, the details don't
00:56:43.900 matter.
00:56:44.740 But, how do you feel about
00:56:46.500 the existence of UFOs when
00:56:48.380 one of the main witnesses
00:56:51.500 admits in the past faking
00:56:53.800 UFOs?
00:56:57.820 And I think Michael
00:56:59.320 Sherver said this as well.
00:57:03.500 The reason that people
00:57:04.760 think UFOs are real is that
00:57:07.000 it's hard to believe that
00:57:08.920 anybody who's a human
00:57:10.760 being would make up such a
00:57:13.520 detailed story and put
00:57:14.980 themselves in the middle of
00:57:16.680 it.
00:57:17.340 It just doesn't seem like
00:57:18.420 something a normal person
00:57:19.500 would do.
00:57:20.900 So, you say to yourself,
00:57:21.920 nobody would do that.
00:57:23.140 It must be real.
00:57:24.060 Or at least they must
00:57:24.820 think it's real.
00:57:25.980 Nobody would intentionally
00:57:27.320 do a hoax like that.
00:57:30.260 Do you know who does
00:57:31.380 hoaxes like that?
00:57:33.420 People.
00:57:34.860 People.
00:57:36.160 Since the beginning of
00:57:37.220 time, there's never been
00:57:38.880 a time in human history
00:57:39.900 where there weren't lots
00:57:41.480 and lots of people,
00:57:42.360 usually men, usually men,
00:57:45.380 maybe always men, maybe
00:57:47.940 99,999999% men, who will
00:57:51.820 tell you absolutely
00:57:53.100 anything for various
00:57:55.480 reasons.
00:57:56.040 Make money because it's
00:57:57.220 funny, usually because
00:57:59.120 it's funny.
00:58:00.820 Yeah, usually because it's
00:58:02.060 funny.
00:58:03.960 So if you deny the, you
00:58:06.040 know, if you deny the
00:58:07.560 existence of hoaxers, you're
00:58:09.460 a hoaxer denier.
00:58:11.060 No, hoaxers exist.
00:58:13.200 Definitely exist.
00:58:15.200 Have I ever personally
00:58:16.580 tried to fake a UFO
00:58:17.820 sighting?
00:58:18.360 No comment.
00:58:23.580 Of course I have.
00:58:25.620 You don't think at least
00:58:26.840 once I've taken a picture
00:58:27.940 of something I threw in
00:58:30.140 the air when I was a kid?
00:58:33.220 When I was 14, you don't
00:58:34.900 think I ever once threw
00:58:36.100 something in the air and
00:58:37.980 tried to take a picture of
00:58:38.980 it and call it a UFO?
00:58:40.780 They didn't come out very
00:58:41.920 well, but of course I tried.
00:58:43.920 Of course I tried.
00:58:51.480 Who calls me before 8 a.m.?
00:58:56.620 All right.
00:58:59.660 I think I know what it is.
00:59:02.420 And my last story, how many
00:59:04.280 of you saw the Tucker
00:59:05.540 interview with Devin
00:59:06.720 Archer?
00:59:07.040 So, it was like hours
00:59:09.920 long, so I told myself I
00:59:11.520 wasn't going to listen, but
00:59:13.160 then I made the mistake of
00:59:14.420 listening to a couple of
00:59:15.940 minutes of it.
00:59:17.700 And if you listen to a
00:59:18.880 couple of minutes of it, it
00:59:19.960 does draw you in.
00:59:21.460 And the stuff that I got
00:59:22.700 drawn in on wasn't even
00:59:24.340 important.
00:59:25.540 Like, it was just Devin
00:59:26.440 Archer describing the path
00:59:29.440 of his life.
00:59:31.420 I would have listened to
00:59:32.480 that all day.
00:59:33.740 It was like this
00:59:34.380 fascinating story of how
00:59:36.660 an unusually smart kid
00:59:39.100 who got to Yale, and he
00:59:40.500 played some lacrosse, I
00:59:42.200 guess.
00:59:42.920 But how does a smart kid
00:59:44.540 who's, you know, very
00:59:45.920 internationally oriented
00:59:49.060 and willing to do big
00:59:51.040 things, and, you know, how
00:59:52.540 did he go from just being
00:59:53.680 smart and playing lacrosse
00:59:55.300 to Yale to being in the
00:59:58.180 middle of history?
00:59:59.780 And there are a few
01:00:01.140 things he knows.
01:00:01.940 First of all, he's
01:00:03.220 insanely likable.
01:00:05.460 You know, I heard a
01:00:06.220 number of people say
01:00:06.980 that, and I thought,
01:00:08.780 yeah, yeah, yeah,
01:00:09.660 everybody can be
01:00:10.500 likable.
01:00:11.480 That's not really a high
01:00:12.380 bar, right?
01:00:13.600 Everybody's likable,
01:00:14.900 right?
01:00:15.380 But he's super likable.
01:00:17.580 He's, like, extra
01:00:18.540 likable.
01:00:19.720 So the longer he talks,
01:00:21.380 like, he laughs at
01:00:22.400 himself, and he's
01:00:23.580 self-deprecating, but he
01:00:25.340 does self-deprecating
01:00:26.380 right.
01:00:27.440 Like, he doesn't do it
01:00:28.340 the cringy way.
01:00:29.620 He does it the way where
01:00:30.620 you're laughing with
01:00:31.420 him.
01:00:31.540 Like, it's all just
01:00:33.100 kind of weird and
01:00:33.740 funny.
01:00:35.000 But let me tell you,
01:00:37.100 when he was done
01:00:38.100 explaining the entire
01:00:39.360 sequence of events that
01:00:41.300 got all the way to
01:00:42.260 Hunter on the board of
01:00:43.400 Burisma, it all
01:00:45.700 sounded normal and
01:00:46.860 legal to me.
01:00:49.420 Isn't that weird?
01:00:50.860 It all sounded legal to
01:00:52.300 me.
01:00:53.980 Now, you can say it's
01:00:55.500 inappropriate.
01:00:59.540 You could say that you
01:01:01.520 wish it didn't happen.
01:01:02.700 You could say it's
01:01:03.760 distorting politics.
01:01:05.400 You could say it should
01:01:06.180 be illegal.
01:01:07.520 You know, I'm with you
01:01:08.160 on all that.
01:01:09.660 But when he laid it all
01:01:11.020 out, I found him 100%
01:01:13.340 credible.
01:01:14.960 I mean, unless he's the
01:01:15.940 world's best liar.
01:01:17.200 But he does not look like
01:01:18.380 a liar.
01:01:19.320 He does not look like a
01:01:20.440 liar.
01:01:20.760 Not that I could tell.
01:01:22.640 But I'm just telling you
01:01:23.360 the way he presents
01:01:24.960 himself is very honest.
01:01:27.120 Good presentation of
01:01:28.360 honesty, anyway.
01:01:29.920 And when he was done, I
01:01:32.040 saw a series of events
01:01:33.940 where it was sort of one
01:01:35.140 thing led to another
01:01:35.940 thing.
01:01:36.820 Somebody saw an
01:01:37.580 opportunity.
01:01:38.800 You know, somebody made
01:01:39.540 a phone call.
01:01:40.820 And the next thing you
01:01:41.540 know, you have this
01:01:42.040 situation.
01:01:42.640 But honestly, it all
01:01:43.420 looked legal.
01:01:44.860 I didn't see anything
01:01:45.740 illegal.
01:01:47.320 If everything that
01:01:48.320 Devin Archer says is
01:01:49.320 true, which, by the way,
01:01:50.800 matches almost entirely
01:01:53.000 the charges against
01:01:54.020 him.
01:01:55.620 Right?
01:01:55.900 He wasn't defending
01:01:56.680 him.
01:01:57.320 He was actually telling
01:01:58.220 you the details.
01:01:59.520 When you hear the
01:02:00.220 details, you go, that's
01:02:01.580 probably totally legal.
01:02:04.840 So apparently, here's
01:02:07.480 what you need to know.
01:02:08.580 If you're a big company
01:02:09.960 outside the United
01:02:10.840 States, and you want to
01:02:12.860 get something done that
01:02:14.640 involves the United
01:02:15.420 States, you're probably
01:02:16.800 going to have to deal
01:02:17.420 with, in some ways,
01:02:18.520 regulatory things or,
01:02:19.940 you know, bureaucratic
01:02:21.200 things or, you're going
01:02:22.700 to have to get
01:02:23.100 something done.
01:02:24.440 Right?
01:02:24.760 You can't just set up
01:02:25.760 shop.
01:02:27.380 So, because our
01:02:28.740 government is somewhat
01:02:29.900 opaque, like you
01:02:31.840 wouldn't know who to
01:02:32.480 talk to, you wouldn't
01:02:33.520 know what to do,
01:02:34.220 there's this huge
01:02:35.100 industry of, usually
01:02:36.440 lawyers, I guess, like
01:02:37.840 Hunter, whose job it
01:02:39.680 is to make sure you can
01:02:40.600 talk to the right
01:02:41.220 person.
01:02:42.420 And that's it.
01:02:43.160 You meet the right
01:02:43.940 person to get something
01:02:44.800 done.
01:02:45.820 Now, here's the weird
01:02:46.840 thing.
01:02:47.120 I don't think the
01:02:49.380 economy can survive
01:02:50.500 without it.
01:02:52.580 Because it's all these
01:02:53.540 people who would not be
01:02:55.000 able to do business
01:02:55.940 unless they could find
01:02:57.320 the right person to
01:02:58.020 talk to.
01:02:58.560 Because the bureaucracy
01:02:59.520 would just be a total
01:03:01.240 stopper.
01:03:02.300 You would never get a
01:03:03.220 license, you'd never get
01:03:04.200 anything approved, you'd
01:03:05.860 never get past some
01:03:06.760 regulatory hurdle.
01:03:08.520 So, I do believe that
01:03:10.300 this, you know,
01:03:11.820 unseemly corrupt-looking
01:03:14.980 business of people
01:03:16.000 connecting important
01:03:17.540 people, it might be the
01:03:19.500 only thing that's keeping
01:03:20.360 anything running, as bad
01:03:22.300 as it is, right?
01:03:23.460 I'm not defending it, I'm
01:03:25.180 just saying, what's your
01:03:25.820 alternative?
01:03:32.080 All right, I have to go
01:03:33.040 yell at somebody outside
01:03:34.140 my doorway.
01:03:35.600 We'll be right back.
01:03:36.200 Hello.
01:03:46.060 Hello.
01:03:47.560 Can you sit outside for a
01:03:48.740 second?
01:03:50.740 Hi.
01:03:53.000 I don't have access to that.
01:03:55.760 I'm on a live stream.
01:03:58.280 Go to the house.
01:04:00.080 Sorry, real world, I'm
01:04:13.640 having some work done.
01:04:15.420 Who shows up before 8 a.m.?
01:04:17.660 Seriously.
01:04:19.700 Who shows up before 8 a.m.?
01:04:21.760 Without telling you first.
01:04:26.340 Well, I'm glad they're on
01:04:27.520 the job, getting the job
01:04:29.060 done.
01:04:29.340 All right, that's all I
01:04:30.500 had today.
01:04:31.620 I'm going to say goodbye
01:04:32.400 to YouTube, and I will
01:04:37.940 talk to you tomorrow.