Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2200 Scott Adams： If You Want Your Mind Blown, Today Is The Day For That. Bring Cleanup Rags

00:00:00.000 Do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do.

00:00:05.460 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization times two.

00:00:11.860 You might see behind me a whiteboard, but don't be confused.

00:00:16.060 It's two whiteboards, two whiteboards today.

00:00:18.660 Yeah, I know, settle down, settle down, two whiteboards.

00:00:22.500 But if you'd like to put your mind at a level that is equal to the content you're going to see today,

00:00:28.700 all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or chalice or stein,

00:00:32.260 a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:35.720 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.

00:00:38.380 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure, the dopamine at the end of the day,

00:00:42.020 the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:44.180 It's called the simultaneous sip. It happens now. Go.

00:00:51.960 There we go.

00:00:53.720 Yes, everybody, have an equitable morning.

00:00:56.400 We will settle for nothing less.

00:00:59.180 Lots of stories today.

00:01:01.320 I'm not sure the Zuckerberg versus Musk fight is going to happen.

00:01:05.580 I think Zuckerberg is saying that Musk is not serious enough and he doesn't want to do a practice fight at his house.

00:01:14.120 So it looks like maybe that's off. I don't know.

00:01:17.160 But we'll keep an eye on it.

00:01:19.840 RFK Jr. says that the media is hitting him harder than Trump.

00:01:23.920 He says, I like this quote.

00:01:26.160 If I believe the stuff that's written about me in the papers and reported about me on the mainstream news sites,

00:01:32.580 I would definitely not vote for me, Kennedy said, which is totally correct.

00:01:38.100 If you believed what the news said about Kennedy, you wouldn't vote for him.

00:01:44.240 But I remind you, how often is the news about public figures accurate?

00:01:52.600 The news about never, not even ever.

00:01:55.640 There's always context left out.

00:01:58.340 There's always a bias in the reporting.

00:02:00.500 There's always stuff that nobody could possibly know that matters.

00:02:04.740 Yeah.

00:02:05.120 So nothing you see about RFK Jr. is going to be true if it's in the news.

00:02:09.780 At least not true completely.

00:02:12.720 It'll be maybe true facts, but out of context, that sort of thing.

00:02:17.480 All right.

00:02:18.120 I have a conspiracy theory to add to the mix.

00:02:22.100 Do you feel like there are enough?

00:02:24.580 Do you need a new conspiracy theory?

00:02:26.780 Yeah.

00:02:27.720 But you're going to have to help me out on the fact checking on this.

00:02:31.340 Because there are so many legal cases going on that I'm starting to get confused.

00:02:37.300 What's a Biden case and what's a Trump case and which Trump case is it?

00:02:42.160 And is it the gun charges or is it something else?

00:02:47.460 So Weiss, I'm getting Jack Smith and Weiss confused.

00:02:54.000 Well, Weiss is the one who did the sweetheart deal for Hunter, right?

00:03:01.720 Is that right?

00:03:03.880 So Weiss is the one with the sweetheart deal for Hunter.

00:03:06.380 Now, Weiss is also the one who's been chosen as the, what do you call it, the special counsel?

00:03:15.500 All right.

00:03:16.540 So here's a sequence of events that didn't make sense.

00:03:21.920 So Weiss was a Trump-appointed prosecutor, correct?

00:03:26.240 Give me a fact check on that.

00:03:27.900 Trump-appointed.

00:03:30.600 Right?

00:03:31.080 Trump-appointed, but then brought a Biden-related sweetheart plea deal to the courts, and it was so bad that it was thrown away.

00:03:41.220 So how do you explain that?

00:03:45.880 Why would he be a professional and even a, you know, possibly, you know, not too lefty?

00:03:54.020 But why would he do something that so obviously was, you know, imperfect?

00:03:59.040 I don't know the answer to this, but I would tell you what I would do in his situation, just to give you some context.

00:04:09.360 All right.

00:04:09.720 Let's say you put me in Weiss's situation, and my boss, Garland, says you have full approval to prosecute in any state you want,

00:04:19.740 and you have all the resources you want, and nobody will bother you.

00:04:22.440 And then you find out none of that's true, hypothetically.

00:04:27.100 You find out that you can't actually do whatever you want.

00:04:31.200 You don't have the power, and they lied to you, and they did not help you the entire time.

00:04:35.640 How would you play it?

00:04:37.460 Would you resign?

00:04:39.420 Some people would.

00:04:41.360 It's not what I would have done.

00:04:43.540 Do you know what I would do?

00:04:44.940 It's a little thing called embrace and amplify.

00:04:49.360 Yeah.

00:04:50.540 Once you see it.

00:04:51.480 You put me in his job, and you know what I'd do?

00:04:55.260 I would put together the most absurd, ridiculous plea agreement.

00:05:00.920 I'd make sure that all the idiots who were trying to block me and stop me and influence me

00:05:05.220 thought it was the best plea deal they'd ever seen,

00:05:08.600 and then I would go public with it, and I would let it blow up in my face.

00:05:14.140 Just the way it happened.

00:05:15.520 I would put together a deal so absurd that the public would be signaled that there's no justice going on.

00:05:23.960 And that's what happened.

00:05:25.300 And so absurd, he couldn't guarantee that a judge would throw it out.

00:05:29.100 But he had to know it was an option.

00:05:30.640 And what would happen if the judge threw it out?

00:05:35.300 Well, there would be a lot of conversation then, wouldn't there, about what was going on.

00:05:40.100 And then the fuckery that I think he was probably subjected to would come to light.

00:05:47.920 And what was the net result?

00:05:51.340 He got more power.

00:05:53.340 He got more power.

00:05:54.800 Now, I understand the argument that, oh, isn't this convenient?

00:05:58.920 You know, just when Congress wanted to look into things, it becomes a special counsel so that they can't.

00:06:05.480 Yes, that is very convenient.

00:06:07.020 And it might be the whole reason.

00:06:08.820 Could be.

00:06:09.940 Wouldn't rule it out.

00:06:10.760 So maybe the whole thing is just to keep Congress from finding out what's going on.

00:06:16.180 But the other possibility is if you put me in Weiss's job and then I found out I couldn't do my job,

00:06:23.320 and yet it was my job to go embarrass myself in public like I really had, I wouldn't do it.

00:06:29.660 I would not play along.

00:06:31.720 But I wouldn't necessarily resign.

00:06:34.140 I would stay to destroy the system.

00:06:37.080 That's what I'd do.

00:06:37.780 I mean, I think that's just a personality thing.

00:06:41.940 But if you put me in that situation, what I would do would look exactly like what he did.

00:06:47.600 But my intentions would be to blow it up and just show how corrupt it is.

00:06:53.020 Now, if that's what happened, and then the result of that is he got the power he always needed in the first place,

00:06:59.120 you might see something like an interesting outcome.

00:07:01.560 However, today we find out that the so-called diversion agreement, where I think they take a classic case for a diversion agreement,

00:07:12.340 as I understand it, is that if somebody's an addict but nonviolent,

00:07:19.940 sometimes you'll divert them into some treatment and don't treat the crime like you might have,

00:07:26.140 because it's a nonviolent situation.

00:07:27.900 So, to me, this is a perfect situation for a diversion agreement.

00:07:33.160 Like, he is nonviolent.

00:07:35.920 There's not much chance, you know, he's going to do that exact same gun crime of lying on a federal form.

00:07:42.780 What, is he going to repeat that crime?

00:07:45.060 I don't think so.

00:07:46.820 So, you need some kind of, you know, the justice system needs to be involved.

00:07:51.440 He wouldn't like a diversion either.

00:07:52.820 But it seems like the right application.

00:07:56.260 And now there's some thought that the diversion part was separate from the plea deal,

00:08:01.120 so that at least the gun charges would be treated in a diversion-y way.

00:08:06.920 I think that means he gets treatment, counseling, something like that.

00:08:11.160 Doesn't get to keep his guns, I imagine.

00:08:13.720 So, I think that's what the legal system should be doing for somebody like him.

00:08:18.440 But, you know, the rest of the plea deal, I suppose that's a bigger question.

00:08:23.700 All right.

00:08:25.100 So, I'm just going to throw that out there as this might be an embrace.

00:08:31.360 Embrace and amplify.

00:08:32.480 It might be.

00:08:33.160 It looks like it.

00:08:34.580 Jordan Peterson says he's creating a new college online.

00:08:37.440 Isn't that, like, one of the best things you've heard lately?

00:08:41.540 That Jordan Peterson is trying to create an actual accredited online university

00:08:46.560 that wouldn't have all the flaws of current education systems.

00:08:51.080 You know, the wokeness and ridiculous courses and stuff like that.

00:08:56.720 But he thinks he could get the cost of a bachelor's degree down to $4,000 if it's online.

00:09:05.100 Now, I don't think online is as good as in person.

00:09:10.800 But maybe with AI it will be fairly quickly.

00:09:13.800 Maybe it will be.

00:09:15.060 Because if you had AI to ask questions, you know, in addition to whatever the lecture looked like

00:09:22.640 and the homework, it might really help.

00:09:25.760 I mean, we might be where online is actually competitive.

00:09:28.980 And, you know, Jordan Peterson would be exactly the person I would hope would be involved in this sort of thing

00:09:36.280 because he can see the whole field.

00:09:38.300 You know, he understands academia, of course.

00:09:42.700 But he also gets the whole psychological, political, you know, situation

00:09:47.800 so he could put together something that made sense.

00:09:50.180 So I like that.

00:09:54.000 But I would like to amplify and add to this conversation a little bit

00:09:58.720 with some whiteboards that are coming up.

00:10:01.480 Don't get too excited.

00:10:03.160 Oh, yeah, it's going to be good.

00:10:04.560 It's going to be good.

00:10:06.180 But I asked this question on my live stream in my man cave last night.

00:10:10.960 And I'm going to ask the same question to you in this group

00:10:14.040 because I think he's relevant to Jordan Peterson and his creating new colleges online.

00:10:20.060 Question number one.

00:10:21.800 You're an employer.

00:10:23.780 And you're looking for employees.

00:10:25.620 And you've got two candidates.

00:10:27.480 And they seem to be identical.

00:10:29.900 One is a white candidate.

00:10:31.800 One is a black candidate.

00:10:33.660 But on paper, they seem to have just the same background and experience.

00:10:38.140 So you can't tell.

00:10:38.780 But the black candidate mentions that he's building a talent stack

00:10:44.880 and he prefers systems over goals.

00:10:49.020 And you immediately recognize that he's read my book,

00:10:52.820 Had It Failed Almost Everything and Still Went Big.

00:10:56.620 Who do you hire?

00:10:58.560 Which one do you hire?

00:11:00.360 The one who read my book or the one who didn't?

00:11:04.100 Well, read it and is implementing it.

00:11:06.320 Racist says white person.

00:11:11.080 No, you would hire the black person

00:11:12.600 because the black person had acquired a set of skills

00:11:17.200 that very clearly signal a serious person

00:11:21.740 who is very likely to do well.

00:11:24.160 And you would want to work with them.

00:11:26.300 So I put that out there as evidence

00:11:29.740 that there already is a strategy for people to succeed.

00:11:34.300 But why don't they?

00:11:37.920 What's holding things up?

00:11:39.560 If we know exactly what it would take for any individual,

00:11:43.780 be they white or black or brown or anything else,

00:11:47.060 we'd know how to do it.

00:11:49.260 Why isn't it happening?

00:11:50.680 Well, that's what the white boards are going to teach you.

00:11:53.340 Are you ready for this?

00:11:54.640 Are you ready to have your mind blown?

00:11:56.940 Some people on the locals' platform,

00:11:59.580 my community there, have seen some of this.

00:12:02.720 But you're going to see it all put together

00:12:04.800 in a way they haven't seen either.

00:12:07.320 So the first part you may have seen.

00:12:10.960 It's an idea by philosopher Lao Tzu.

00:12:18.580 I'll try to get rid of that.

00:12:21.060 There we go.

00:12:22.300 And Lao Tzu said many years ago,

00:12:26.180 he said,

00:12:26.600 watch your thoughts because your thoughts become words.

00:12:30.100 Watch your words because your words become actions.

00:12:33.340 Watch your actions because they become habits.

00:12:36.380 Habits become your character.

00:12:38.460 And your character is destiny.

00:12:42.060 Now, I'm going to update this.

00:12:45.020 Lao Tzu was a very smart guy, apparently.

00:12:49.600 But he was smart before we discovered how to make AI work.

00:12:55.100 So there's something we have to update on this.

00:12:59.180 Words and thoughts, turns out, are the same thing.

00:13:05.300 Whoops.

00:13:06.520 So AI taught us, the large language models,

00:13:10.920 that all you have to do is look at the pattern of words

00:13:13.580 and if you applied the right technology to it,

00:13:17.860 just the word use alone would produce intelligence.

00:13:23.180 But before that, we imagined we had some kind of,

00:13:26.200 you know, reason and thoughts and stuff

00:13:28.340 that was independent from our words.

00:13:30.800 But AI kind of put the lie to that,

00:13:33.340 which is something, by the way,

00:13:35.140 hypnotists have known forever.

00:13:37.680 Hypnotists know that the words are what are activating you.

00:13:41.360 The thoughts are really word combinations

00:13:45.240 because we think in words, right?

00:13:49.060 Your thoughts right now, your private thoughts, are in words.

00:13:52.000 If you were to change those words, what would happen?

00:13:56.720 Well, if you change the words,

00:13:58.220 so I'm going to treat words and thoughts as one thing

00:14:01.400 because AI taught us that, right?

00:14:03.400 So if you change your words,

00:14:05.140 you're going to change your actions

00:14:06.520 because that's how you're built.

00:14:08.860 That's the only way it can work.

00:14:10.340 The things you do are literally based

00:14:13.480 on the frequency and combination of words

00:14:15.880 in your programmer, your head, your brain.

00:14:19.360 So to reprogram a person

00:14:21.440 from something suboptimal

00:14:23.280 to something that they would want,

00:14:25.080 all you do is change the frequency

00:14:27.440 and arrangement of words.

00:14:31.780 Do you know what this is called?

00:14:33.800 If you change the frequency

00:14:35.560 and arrangement of words,

00:14:37.500 and what you're doing

00:14:39.420 is trying to change somebody's actions,

00:14:40.940 what's that called?

00:14:43.800 Wordsmithing?

00:14:44.320 No.

00:14:46.060 Reframing?

00:14:46.800 Yes.

00:14:47.900 Could be.

00:14:49.160 Hypnosis.

00:14:50.140 That's exactly what hypnosis is.

00:14:52.840 Hypnosis is not...

00:14:54.320 A lot of people, if they watch movies,

00:14:56.120 they think it's about the watch this clock.

00:14:58.880 They think it's about the voice of the hypnotist.

00:15:01.880 It's not the voice.

00:15:03.700 It's not the mannerisms,

00:15:04.920 although those are helpful parts of the process.

00:15:08.280 It's actually the frequency

00:15:10.540 and the arrangement of words.

00:15:15.620 That's hypnosis.

00:15:17.440 That's it.

00:15:18.720 That's enough to change somebody's entire brain

00:15:21.700 and their actions,

00:15:23.300 their habits,

00:15:24.060 their character,

00:15:24.620 and then their destiny.

00:15:26.840 So if you could optimize the words in your head,

00:15:31.040 blah, blah, blah.

00:15:31.960 Let me give you a real concrete example.

00:15:34.640 The other day I was showing this to somebody

00:15:36.920 and the person said

00:15:39.800 that they were working on a problem.

00:15:43.060 They had a fear of rejection.

00:15:46.360 Right?

00:15:47.000 They were considering doing something.

00:15:48.840 It was somebody considering an action

00:15:51.060 which would have been almost certainly good for them.

00:15:53.400 A very obvious,

00:15:55.860 really obvious thing to do

00:15:58.760 that would be good for you,

00:16:00.140 but couldn't get the action right

00:16:01.740 because of a fear of rejection.

00:16:06.060 That, ladies and gentlemen,

00:16:08.220 is word poisoning.

00:16:10.620 You say to yourself,

00:16:12.280 well, there's some bad thoughts there.

00:16:14.600 No.

00:16:15.260 Words are thoughts.

00:16:17.320 Words and their combinations

00:16:19.480 and their frequency

00:16:21.220 is your thoughts.

00:16:23.400 There's no difference.

00:16:25.360 Once you get that,

00:16:27.240 you unlock this power.

00:16:29.300 Until you understand

00:16:30.500 that your words

00:16:31.460 are a programming language

00:16:33.200 that you can change on your own,

00:16:36.200 you don't have access to the stack.

00:16:39.160 Right?

00:16:39.700 And then when I heard

00:16:41.200 the person say to me,

00:16:43.580 fear of rejection,

00:16:45.440 I had this thought.

00:16:46.500 I don't use that word

00:16:49.520 for anything.

00:16:52.460 Anything.

00:16:54.000 I'm never going to let that word

00:16:55.340 in my head.

00:16:56.940 When I heard it,

00:16:57.980 I recoiled.

00:16:59.820 I recoiled.

00:17:00.700 The actual word hurt me.

00:17:02.740 I was like,

00:17:03.200 shit,

00:17:03.640 I don't want that in my head.

00:17:05.720 I will never use that word

00:17:07.520 because I don't want to

00:17:09.620 stop myself from acting.

00:17:11.900 Do you know what I say

00:17:14.040 in those situations?

00:17:15.800 This is going to be great.

00:17:19.020 This would be great.

00:17:20.420 Because keep in mind

00:17:21.360 that in all of the situations

00:17:22.840 I'm talking about,

00:17:23.700 mine or anybody else's,

00:17:25.160 people know what

00:17:25.980 they're supposed to do.

00:17:28.100 Am I right?

00:17:29.700 Don't people almost always

00:17:30.880 know what they're supposed to do?

00:17:32.840 It's just hard to do it.

00:17:34.840 And the reason it's hard

00:17:35.740 is because you don't have

00:17:36.460 your words right.

00:17:37.800 If the word in your head

00:17:38.920 is the word rejection,

00:17:39.860 you're not going to do this.

00:17:42.300 Whatever it is.

00:17:43.540 If the word in your head

00:17:44.560 is this is going to be great,

00:17:46.400 this will be exciting,

00:17:47.920 this will be interesting.

00:17:49.320 By the way,

00:17:50.440 curiosity is one of the best

00:17:52.140 replacement words.

00:17:54.160 If you have some negative words

00:17:55.720 and you want the easiest way

00:17:57.020 to replace them,

00:17:58.260 replace them with curiosity words.

00:18:00.660 I wonder what's going to happen.

00:18:02.140 Well, this will be interesting.

00:18:03.600 I'm fascinated about how

00:18:05.020 today is going to turn out.

00:18:07.500 You put those words in your head,

00:18:09.020 you're going to act.

00:18:10.480 You put the R word in your head,

00:18:12.420 I'm not even going to say it again

00:18:13.560 because it's such a damaging word.

00:18:16.400 Or the F word,

00:18:17.860 F-A-I-L.

00:18:19.600 Nope.

00:18:21.520 When I say it's not in my vocabulary,

00:18:23.740 I mean that I've consciously

00:18:25.000 made sure that if it comes up,

00:18:27.520 it's not about me.

00:18:29.580 I'm talking about a system failure

00:18:31.480 or something like that.

00:18:33.260 All right.

00:18:33.540 How many of you are sold

00:18:36.940 on this as a good way

00:18:38.700 of understanding the world?

00:18:40.980 Just give me a halfway point.

00:18:44.500 Is this a good way

00:18:45.500 to understand what you see?

00:18:48.760 All right.

00:18:49.320 I think most of you say yes.

00:18:50.980 Got one now.

00:18:52.600 All right.

00:18:53.220 So now I'm going to...

00:18:54.040 So hold on to this thought

00:18:55.300 that words,

00:18:57.140 not thoughts,

00:18:58.820 words

00:18:59.540 are what unlock habits.

00:19:01.680 Okay?

00:19:03.360 Words

00:19:03.840 and the combination of words

00:19:05.460 is the only thing

00:19:06.800 that unlocks habits.

00:19:08.400 Not thoughts,

00:19:10.000 just the words.

00:19:12.020 If you don't get that,

00:19:12.940 you don't get anything.

00:19:14.880 All right?

00:19:18.900 Now let's explain the world.

00:19:21.680 This, by the way,

00:19:23.360 would apply to

00:19:24.520 other people more generally.

00:19:27.380 But I'm going to give you

00:19:28.060 a specific problem.

00:19:30.220 So we have a problem.

00:19:31.280 Let's say you're a black kid

00:19:33.560 and you want to succeed

00:19:35.060 in this world

00:19:35.760 and you want to do it

00:19:36.940 the way everybody succeeds.

00:19:38.980 The way everybody succeeds

00:19:40.520 is they imitate people

00:19:43.360 who have successful patterns.

00:19:46.580 So you look for somebody

00:19:47.500 who's succeeding

00:19:48.080 and you say,

00:19:48.700 what are you doing to succeed?

00:19:50.420 And then you try to do that.

00:19:52.340 That's how everybody does it.

00:19:54.520 Everybody everywhere.

00:19:55.920 Now every once in a while

00:19:57.140 you might produce

00:19:57.960 a Steve Jobs, right?

00:19:59.600 Steve Jobs does seem magical.

00:20:02.220 It's like he was inventing things

00:20:04.140 that other people copied.

00:20:06.560 Now I don't think

00:20:07.440 he actually invented anything,

00:20:08.840 but he was better

00:20:09.300 at noticing patterns.

00:20:10.880 So he might be

00:20:12.260 like a real exception

00:20:13.860 where he's inventing patterns

00:20:16.220 as opposed to following them.

00:20:18.080 But the rest of us follow,

00:20:19.880 we would follow him, right?

00:20:22.040 So you'd say,

00:20:22.540 what did you do?

00:20:23.600 All right,

00:20:23.840 let's do more of that.

00:20:24.780 But because we have an industry

00:20:27.660 that tells you that,

00:20:30.860 well, these all have

00:20:31.840 something in common.

00:20:32.540 The DEI, the CRT, the ESG,

00:20:34.900 one thing they have in common

00:20:36.380 is the words.

00:20:38.880 That there were slaves,

00:20:42.140 there is systemic racism,

00:20:44.840 there is black and there's white,

00:20:47.580 and that there is a oppressor class

00:20:51.120 and an oppressed class.

00:20:54.140 Those would be,

00:20:55.140 you know,

00:20:55.360 that's an example of the words, right?

00:20:57.580 So don't think too hard

00:20:58.960 about those specific words,

00:21:00.180 but you would agree

00:21:00.940 that all of these ideas,

00:21:04.320 these concepts,

00:21:05.580 are built on words.

00:21:09.800 You agree so far?

00:21:11.640 It's a word-related set of thoughts,

00:21:15.620 as everything is.

00:21:16.460 So these are not uniquely about words.

00:21:20.420 Any three-letter concepts I put here

00:21:22.960 would also be supported

00:21:25.080 by their sets of words.

00:21:27.880 These sets of words create

00:21:29.340 what I call the glass imitation ceiling,

00:21:32.900 meaning that if you're a young black kid

00:21:35.500 and you're asked to imitate successful people,

00:21:39.740 you're going to be looking at the people

00:21:41.080 that you have been taught

00:21:42.240 are your oppressors.

00:21:44.160 Who can do that?

00:21:45.640 Who could imitate their oppressors?

00:21:48.460 I couldn't.

00:21:50.060 If you said the only way you can succeed

00:21:51.900 is by imitating your oppressors

00:21:54.020 or a life of crime,

00:21:56.740 I'd pick the crime.

00:21:59.700 I would.

00:22:01.640 I'm just being honest.

00:22:02.700 If you put me in that same situation,

00:22:05.260 the mental, emotional impact

00:22:09.160 of having to imitate my oppressor,

00:22:12.800 there's just no way I'd do it.

00:22:14.540 I would take up a life of crime

00:22:17.240 before I did that.

00:22:18.620 So that's the situation

00:22:19.560 you're putting black kids in.

00:22:21.960 And again, if anybody's new to me,

00:22:24.220 I'm never talking about all black kids.

00:22:27.040 I'm never talking about

00:22:28.240 all white people anything.

00:22:30.400 I'm never talking about

00:22:31.340 all black people anything.

00:22:32.860 Or all anybody anything.

00:22:35.060 People are amazingly different

00:22:37.360 from each other,

00:22:38.520 but this is just a good

00:22:39.840 conceptual framework.

00:22:40.980 So here's what I think

00:22:43.380 has to be fixed.

00:22:45.780 Black Americans have

00:22:47.100 an imitation ceiling.

00:22:48.480 They simply can't do

00:22:49.500 the things that other people

00:22:51.020 would do.

00:22:51.960 But the tools are all there.

00:22:55.180 The tools are there.

00:22:56.260 I mentioned my book,

00:22:57.720 Had It Failed Almost Everything,

00:22:58.900 It Still Went Big.

00:23:00.060 My new one that is also coming out,

00:23:02.080 I think this week,

00:23:03.100 if the last technical parts

00:23:04.840 work with the online publishing.

00:23:07.340 But those would be two examples

00:23:10.560 of books that would

00:23:12.220 tell anybody how to succeed.

00:23:15.480 Because I've organized

00:23:16.680 the words in the books

00:23:17.920 to make that happen.

00:23:20.600 The books are also hypnosis

00:23:21.880 in the sense that

00:23:23.220 they're built to be persuasive

00:23:25.240 as well as utilitarian.

00:23:28.960 So, how do you fix this?

00:23:34.440 I'm going to tell you

00:23:35.440 that I have no idea.

00:23:36.260 I have no idea

00:23:37.480 how to fix it.

00:23:38.180 The only thing I'm sure of

00:23:39.500 is that it has to be fixed

00:23:41.580 by the people

00:23:42.180 who are involved,

00:23:43.400 which is not me.

00:23:45.620 This is something

00:23:46.460 that can't be fixed

00:23:47.440 from the outside,

00:23:48.480 no matter how good

00:23:49.360 your intentions are,

00:23:50.900 no matter how good

00:23:51.700 your skill is,

00:23:53.440 and no matter anything.

00:23:55.380 It doesn't matter

00:23:55.860 how many resources you have.

00:23:57.640 There are some things

00:23:58.520 that have to be fixed

00:23:59.320 from the inside.

00:24:01.140 And I feel like

00:24:02.120 every time you put

00:24:03.020 outside pressure

00:24:04.040 on a group

00:24:05.560 that's already

00:24:06.240 in a, say,

00:24:07.780 victim and oppressor

00:24:08.860 model,

00:24:10.100 that outside pressure,

00:24:11.940 depending on who

00:24:12.660 it comes from,

00:24:13.920 let's say it comes

00:24:14.640 from somebody like me,

00:24:16.280 is it helping?

00:24:18.280 I don't know.

00:24:19.100 I don't have a good

00:24:21.020 argument that would say

00:24:21.860 it would help.

00:24:23.040 It might actually

00:24:23.540 make it worse.

00:24:25.140 So somehow

00:24:25.840 black America

00:24:27.060 needs to figure this out.

00:24:29.280 You know,

00:24:29.500 how do they either

00:24:30.420 create enough

00:24:31.280 black successful people

00:24:32.920 or stories about them

00:24:34.560 so that young black kids

00:24:36.580 have lots of role models

00:24:37.600 that they can imitate?

00:24:39.060 But this is the basic setup.

00:24:42.480 You don't know

00:24:43.740 how much of your problem

00:24:44.760 is systemic racism

00:24:46.120 until you deal

00:24:47.600 with the fact

00:24:48.260 that people

00:24:48.960 are not pursuing

00:24:49.760 individual success

00:24:51.140 because they feel

00:24:52.520 like it's denied

00:24:53.440 to them

00:24:53.880 or where it would

00:24:55.680 be unpleasant

00:24:56.320 to copy somebody.

00:24:58.540 So,

00:24:59.220 that's my

00:25:01.460 understanding

00:25:02.200 of the world.

00:25:03.020 Did it help?

00:25:04.800 All right,

00:25:05.320 give me some feedback.

00:25:06.880 Did this tell you,

00:25:08.040 did this give you

00:25:08.640 a framework

00:25:09.120 that you can

00:25:11.000 at least say,

00:25:11.560 well,

00:25:11.720 I could compare this

00:25:12.520 to some other

00:25:13.100 points of view?

00:25:13.620 There's a big difference

00:25:17.580 in the comments

00:25:18.640 on YouTube

00:25:19.180 versus here.

00:25:20.240 All right,

00:25:20.520 for those who said no,

00:25:24.200 I guess it would be hard

00:25:25.560 to ask the question.

00:25:26.960 So,

00:25:27.280 I see more yeses

00:25:28.100 than no's,

00:25:29.020 but I think the no's

00:25:30.220 may be,

00:25:34.000 yeah,

00:25:34.320 I mean,

00:25:34.560 I have a theory

00:25:35.220 about the no's.

00:25:37.580 I think the no's

00:25:38.680 are people

00:25:39.020 who don't want this

00:25:39.880 to be useful.

00:25:42.120 I think there are

00:25:42.640 a lot of people

00:25:43.240 who just want,

00:25:44.780 they want their drama,

00:25:46.960 they want their hate,

00:25:49.740 you know,

00:25:49.980 they want their helplessness.

00:25:51.740 You can get real addicted

00:25:52.860 to that stuff.

00:25:54.460 So,

00:25:56.200 you're welcome

00:25:57.360 to your feelings.

00:25:59.000 All right,

00:25:59.220 Norway is going

00:25:59.960 to be finding meta

00:26:00.840 for their targeted advertising.

00:26:03.580 As you know,

00:26:04.320 meta used to be

00:26:05.260 Facebook.

00:26:07.000 And,

00:26:07.520 their entire business model

00:26:10.740 and other online models

00:26:12.320 is that they can give you

00:26:13.820 an ad that's targeted

00:26:14.820 just for you.

00:26:16.100 But Norway says

00:26:17.360 no to targeted ads

00:26:19.120 sort of on a,

00:26:20.800 I think it's a privacy issue.

00:26:23.280 But they're going to

00:26:24.200 fine $100,000 a day

00:26:26.240 for Facebook

00:26:27.820 and Instagram's business

00:26:29.140 if they keep doing it.

00:26:31.540 Now,

00:26:32.640 whatever Norway does

00:26:34.300 is not going to

00:26:34.940 make or break

00:26:35.720 meta,

00:26:37.100 but it makes you wonder

00:26:40.080 if this is something

00:26:40.880 that could catch on.

00:26:42.600 Would you agree

00:26:43.340 that targeted advertisement

00:26:44.800 is by definition

00:26:46.300 a violation

00:26:46.980 of your privacy?

00:26:50.540 Feels like it.

00:26:52.200 I mean,

00:26:52.480 I understand the argument.

00:26:54.400 But,

00:26:54.740 you know,

00:26:54.920 there are lots of situations

00:26:55.960 where you're trading

00:26:56.620 a little bit of privacy

00:26:57.620 for a little bit

00:26:58.500 of utility.

00:26:59.680 So,

00:27:00.080 you always have to measure,

00:27:01.340 well,

00:27:01.520 I gave up a little privacy,

00:27:03.400 but I got a lot

00:27:04.200 of utility,

00:27:05.300 so,

00:27:06.860 I don't know.

00:27:08.060 Norway might have

00:27:09.200 the right idea on this.

00:27:10.860 This one,

00:27:11.740 I think this one's open

00:27:12.760 for opinion,

00:27:13.580 but I'm leaning

00:27:15.720 toward Norway.

00:27:16.720 But more generally,

00:27:17.680 I don't understand

00:27:18.460 how meta can stay

00:27:19.900 in business.

00:27:22.160 Like,

00:27:23.140 have you ever seen

00:27:23.900 a business in your town

00:27:25.120 that seemed to defy

00:27:27.820 economics

00:27:28.520 to such a degree

00:27:29.760 that you think

00:27:31.080 it must be

00:27:31.600 a money laundering situation?

00:27:34.200 Because they couldn't

00:27:34.780 possibly stay

00:27:35.500 in business

00:27:35.940 for 30 years

00:27:36.880 with the business

00:27:37.900 model that you observe.

00:27:39.580 It's like,

00:27:40.000 okay,

00:27:40.920 you're selling

00:27:41.680 decorative,

00:27:43.980 I don't know,

00:27:45.060 doilies,

00:27:46.340 and you've been

00:27:46.820 in business

00:27:47.280 for 30 years

00:27:48.120 and I never see

00:27:48.780 anybody in your store.

00:27:50.380 You're like,

00:27:50.940 hmm,

00:27:51.380 something else

00:27:51.880 going on there,

00:27:52.520 I think,

00:27:53.160 right?

00:27:55.460 But that's how

00:27:56.220 I feel about

00:27:56.900 meta.

00:28:00.140 I don't know

00:28:00.940 anybody who's

00:28:01.660 happy about using it.

00:28:04.200 Now,

00:28:04.980 Instagram,

00:28:05.580 of course,

00:28:05.960 is a monster

00:28:06.900 and WhatsApp

00:28:08.780 is a monster

00:28:09.540 so they have

00:28:10.440 sources of revenue

00:28:11.380 but the main business

00:28:13.400 which I would say

00:28:15.520 would be the

00:28:16.080 Facebook part

00:28:17.060 of old

00:28:17.560 and now

00:28:18.880 the virtual reality

00:28:20.640 stuff,

00:28:21.480 I think those

00:28:22.080 are dead.

00:28:24.300 Those both feel

00:28:25.100 like dead men

00:28:25.760 walking to me.

00:28:27.340 I don't know

00:28:27.820 how they could survive

00:28:28.500 but we'll see.

00:28:31.280 Zuckerberg,

00:28:31.920 Zuck has been

00:28:32.700 right before.

00:28:34.220 Zuck has been

00:28:34.820 more right than me.

00:28:36.560 So if I'm being

00:28:37.320 reasonably humble,

00:28:40.260 well,

00:28:40.660 he's probably

00:28:41.060 got a better

00:28:41.480 grasp on this

00:28:42.160 than I do.

00:28:44.660 Do you think

00:28:45.160 that history

00:28:46.120 repeats?

00:28:49.480 How many would

00:28:50.560 say this is

00:28:51.100 a fair statement?

00:28:52.360 History repeats.

00:28:56.660 No,

00:28:57.160 it can't repeat.

00:28:58.540 It can't repeat.

00:28:59.560 Here's the problem

00:29:00.160 with history repeats.

00:29:01.720 Which history

00:29:02.340 do you pick?

00:29:05.220 Suppose you were

00:29:05.900 looking at history

00:29:06.640 repeats and you

00:29:07.560 were looking at

00:29:08.120 the news from

00:29:09.320 2015 to today

00:29:11.440 and you wanted

00:29:12.480 to use that as

00:29:13.140 your model for

00:29:13.820 history repeats.

00:29:14.960 Which version

00:29:15.620 of history?

00:29:17.040 Would you use

00:29:17.600 the version that

00:29:18.280 says that

00:29:18.720 President Trump

00:29:19.380 was a coup

00:29:20.900 planner and

00:29:21.560 insurrectionist?

00:29:23.020 And then you

00:29:23.440 would say,

00:29:23.800 well,

00:29:24.000 that'll happen

00:29:24.660 again.

00:29:25.520 Or would you

00:29:25.960 use the version

00:29:26.840 of history that

00:29:27.440 says that was

00:29:27.960 always fake news

00:29:28.940 and that nothing

00:29:30.040 like that

00:29:30.480 happened?

00:29:31.660 They're both

00:29:32.100 history,

00:29:33.640 but they point

00:29:34.540 in opposite

00:29:34.960 directions.

00:29:35.920 So if history

00:29:36.540 repeats,

00:29:37.080 which one do

00:29:37.480 you pick?

00:29:38.660 See the problem?

00:29:40.260 The problem is

00:29:40.920 you get to pick

00:29:41.520 the history you

00:29:42.140 like.

00:29:43.760 It's the opposite

00:29:44.680 of science.

00:29:46.460 If you get to

00:29:47.360 pick the version

00:29:47.960 of history that

00:29:49.240 supports your

00:29:49.800 point, it's not

00:29:51.240 because history

00:29:52.060 repeats, it's

00:29:53.340 that you cherry

00:29:53.940 picked a little

00:29:54.580 story that

00:29:55.800 probably wasn't

00:29:56.440 real to begin

00:29:57.120 with because

00:29:57.620 history isn't

00:29:58.420 real, and

00:29:59.580 then you

00:29:59.880 try to

00:30:00.360 generalize it.

00:30:01.900 Now, history

00:30:02.380 repeats is

00:30:02.900 ridiculous, but

00:30:04.280 we were brainwashed

00:30:05.780 into thinking

00:30:06.320 it's a thing.

00:30:08.440 The only part

00:30:09.340 that I would

00:30:09.940 say history

00:30:10.740 repeats is

00:30:12.740 the human

00:30:13.880 motivations are

00:30:16.840 always the

00:30:17.180 same.

00:30:18.440 So for

00:30:18.840 example, if

00:30:20.320 you created a

00:30:21.320 large organization

00:30:22.520 with no

00:30:23.360 transparency and

00:30:25.160 a lot of

00:30:25.960 money is

00:30:26.360 involved,

00:30:26.840 what's the

00:30:28.840 likelihood that

00:30:29.640 it would

00:30:29.840 eventually become

00:30:30.660 corrupt?

00:30:31.800 100%.

00:30:32.520 100%.

00:30:33.760 So that's a

00:30:34.740 case of history

00:30:35.980 repeating, but

00:30:37.300 it's within the

00:30:38.000 special case of

00:30:39.880 yeah, people

00:30:40.720 always act the

00:30:41.380 same.

00:30:42.420 So instead of

00:30:43.140 saying history

00:30:44.360 repeats, change

00:30:46.420 that in your

00:30:46.860 mind to people

00:30:48.880 are people.

00:30:50.260 Follow the

00:30:50.720 money.

00:30:51.680 Follow the

00:30:52.240 money will take

00:30:52.800 it all.

00:30:53.100 Follow the

00:30:54.520 money gets

00:30:54.960 you the

00:30:55.220 whole answer.

00:30:58.400 It's just

00:30:58.740 always going to

00:30:59.180 be right.

00:31:00.960 So that's

00:31:01.420 better than

00:31:01.900 history repeats.

00:31:03.100 But I

00:31:03.320 mention this

00:31:03.780 because somebody

00:31:04.400 asked, is

00:31:04.800 San Francisco

00:31:05.400 in a doom

00:31:06.260 loop?

00:31:07.340 In other

00:31:07.700 words, is it

00:31:08.400 just going to

00:31:08.940 keep spiraling

00:31:09.980 down into

00:31:10.840 nothing?

00:31:11.800 And somebody

00:31:12.420 used the

00:31:13.040 example of

00:31:13.780 Detroit.

00:31:15.120 Is it going

00:31:15.600 to become

00:31:15.920 like Detroit

00:31:16.660 when manufacturing

00:31:17.700 left?

00:31:18.640 And my

00:31:19.080 answer is no.

00:31:19.820 San Francisco

00:31:21.900 is not going

00:31:22.560 to go to

00:31:23.660 nothing.

00:31:24.940 And neither

00:31:25.720 will Maui.

00:31:27.360 Because Maui

00:31:28.060 and San

00:31:28.440 Francisco have

00:31:29.260 a lot in

00:31:30.200 common.

00:31:31.400 That the

00:31:32.240 weather is

00:31:32.760 unusually

00:31:33.480 good.

00:31:35.700 And even

00:31:35.920 though San

00:31:36.880 Francisco is

00:31:37.540 cold for

00:31:38.260 California,

00:31:39.060 famously foggy

00:31:39.920 and stuff,

00:31:40.620 people like

00:31:41.200 it.

00:31:41.840 I mean, it's

00:31:42.140 something that

00:31:42.540 people like.

00:31:43.940 So, no.

00:31:45.560 If you have

00:31:46.060 the best

00:31:46.500 locations in

00:31:47.420 the world,

00:31:48.620 follow the

00:31:49.200 money.

00:31:50.700 Follow the

00:31:51.220 money.

00:31:52.320 The money

00:31:52.800 says that

00:31:53.700 you always

00:31:54.300 build along

00:31:55.140 the coast.

00:31:57.260 You know,

00:31:57.540 there's just

00:31:57.900 always going

00:31:58.280 to be money

00:31:58.620 for that.

00:31:59.840 Now, yeah,

00:32:00.700 there might

00:32:01.060 be, you

00:32:01.500 know, some

00:32:01.880 companies leave

00:32:02.660 and there's

00:32:03.160 lots of

00:32:03.540 disruption and

00:32:04.300 stuff.

00:32:05.020 But San

00:32:05.900 Francisco isn't

00:32:06.720 going to be

00:32:07.040 abandoned.

00:32:09.340 There's just

00:32:09.940 too much money

00:32:10.640 involved in

00:32:11.380 that location.

00:32:12.520 Of course it'll

00:32:13.240 be rebuilt.

00:32:14.140 Of course it'll

00:32:14.740 come back.

00:32:16.040 And Maui's

00:32:16.600 the same.

00:32:17.460 Nobody's going

00:32:18.020 to leave

00:32:18.320 Maui.

00:32:18.900 you know,

00:32:20.060 unrecovered.

00:32:21.420 Way too

00:32:22.120 much money

00:32:22.620 in that.

00:32:23.820 So, yeah.

00:32:24.600 But Detroit,

00:32:26.380 once manufacturing

00:32:27.520 left Detroit,

00:32:28.360 who had an

00:32:28.940 interest in

00:32:29.560 putting a

00:32:30.560 bunch of

00:32:30.860 money into

00:32:31.280 it to

00:32:31.640 build it

00:32:32.300 up?

00:32:33.240 You still

00:32:33.940 had Detroit

00:32:34.500 weather.

00:32:36.840 All right,

00:32:37.780 so,

00:32:38.920 follow the

00:32:39.260 money,

00:32:39.540 don't say

00:32:39.940 history repeats.

00:32:40.720 So, I've

00:32:42.380 got another

00:32:43.300 theory.

00:32:46.740 So, you

00:32:47.380 probably saw

00:32:47.940 the news

00:32:48.400 that Biden's

00:32:49.140 been at the

00:32:49.780 beach for a

00:32:50.340 few weeks and

00:32:51.100 then he was

00:32:51.520 asked about

00:32:52.020 Maui.

00:32:53.140 And although I

00:32:54.120 think he has

00:32:54.600 put out an

00:32:55.160 official statement,

00:32:56.500 he was asked

00:32:57.000 for a comment

00:32:57.580 alive and he

00:32:58.820 said no

00:32:59.160 comment about

00:33:01.300 Maui, about

00:33:02.720 the fire that

00:33:03.460 destroyed Lahaina and

00:33:05.180 might be the

00:33:05.680 worst disaster we've

00:33:07.020 ever seen, a

00:33:07.740 fire.

00:33:08.020 no comment.

00:33:10.880 Here's my

00:33:11.560 interpretation.

00:33:15.260 If you're

00:33:16.020 Jill Biden and

00:33:18.040 you had been

00:33:18.800 either asked by

00:33:20.000 others or you

00:33:20.760 decided it was

00:33:21.640 time and you

00:33:22.960 are going to

00:33:23.360 tell Joe that

00:33:24.200 he's not going

00:33:24.840 to be president

00:33:25.440 and by the

00:33:26.580 way, I do

00:33:27.540 believe that

00:33:28.080 Jill can just

00:33:28.680 tell him that.

00:33:29.940 Does anybody

00:33:30.340 disagree?

00:33:31.980 I believe that

00:33:33.060 Jill has the

00:33:33.780 decision, his

00:33:34.260 wife, has the

00:33:35.560 decision of

00:33:36.520 whether he runs

00:33:37.200 or not and

00:33:37.740 it's not

00:33:38.180 Joe's decision

00:33:38.840 and I'm not

00:33:40.100 doing the

00:33:40.500 old, oh

00:33:41.700 the wife, you

00:33:43.280 know, the

00:33:43.480 wife's in

00:33:43.940 charge, it's

00:33:44.460 not that.

00:33:45.600 I'm not doing

00:33:46.400 the old, she's

00:33:49.140 always been the

00:33:49.740 puppet master, I'm

00:33:51.080 not doing that.

00:33:52.740 I'm saying that

00:33:53.520 in any couple

00:33:54.920 the older one

00:33:55.540 is, you need to

00:33:58.360 make this decision

00:33:59.280 for me, conceive

00:34:01.940 it that way, but

00:34:03.060 in a realistic

00:34:03.840 sense, when it

00:34:06.100 comes to the

00:34:07.540 big decisions

00:34:08.160 of life, Jill's

00:34:09.960 the decision

00:34:10.500 maker.

00:34:11.580 In my opinion,

00:34:12.620 that would be

00:34:13.080 obvious by this

00:34:14.040 point.

00:34:14.560 I don't think it

00:34:15.100 was obvious four

00:34:17.020 years ago.

00:34:18.740 Four years ago, I

00:34:19.800 think Joe was in

00:34:20.780 enough control that

00:34:24.440 it was more like a

00:34:25.360 partnership.

00:34:26.700 In other words,

00:34:27.420 that both Jill and

00:34:28.840 Joe had to be on

00:34:29.620 board, which they

00:34:30.320 were, it looks

00:34:31.020 like, and then

00:34:32.160 they could go

00:34:32.640 forward.

00:34:33.560 But this time, if

00:34:35.500 Jill is not on

00:34:36.380 board, that's the

00:34:37.720 end of it.

00:34:39.220 Now, if you were

00:34:40.100 Jill, and it was

00:34:41.700 your job to tell

00:34:42.540 your husband that

00:34:43.280 he's not really

00:34:44.020 going to run for

00:34:44.780 president again,

00:34:46.580 how would you do

00:34:47.400 it, and where

00:34:49.040 would you do it,

00:34:50.320 and when would

00:34:51.160 you do it?

00:34:53.500 You would do it

00:34:54.360 right now.

00:34:56.000 You would do it

00:34:57.000 on his summer

00:34:57.960 vacation, and when

00:35:00.080 you were done, what

00:35:02.060 would Joe's frame

00:35:03.820 of mind be?

00:35:04.960 Because remember, it

00:35:06.740 wouldn't be his

00:35:07.380 decision.

00:35:08.440 It would be his

00:35:09.220 wife telling him

00:35:10.620 that was the

00:35:11.320 decision.

00:35:13.340 And when he's

00:35:14.580 asked about

00:35:15.460 Lahaina, after

00:35:18.440 he's been told

00:35:19.180 he's not going to

00:35:19.840 be the president,

00:35:21.680 how does he

00:35:23.320 respond?

00:35:24.900 Well, one way he

00:35:25.740 might respond is

00:35:26.540 no comment.

00:35:28.260 Not because he

00:35:29.240 doesn't care.

00:35:30.080 but because he

00:35:31.940 checked out.

00:35:33.520 And that his

00:35:34.100 mind is entirely

00:35:35.200 upon his own

00:35:36.120 situation right

00:35:36.940 now, which

00:35:38.060 would suggest a

00:35:38.900 decision has

00:35:39.500 already been

00:35:39.960 made.

00:35:41.080 So here's my

00:35:41.960 front running of

00:35:44.380 the news.

00:35:46.180 The decision is

00:35:47.400 made by Jill.

00:35:50.520 Joe has been

00:35:51.360 informed, and

00:35:54.400 you'll find out

00:35:55.200 probably much

00:35:56.040 later.

00:36:00.080 Now, I could be

00:36:00.960 wrong pretty

00:36:02.340 easily, but

00:36:03.700 that's what it

00:36:04.220 looks like.

00:36:05.520 And I base

00:36:06.000 this on pattern

00:36:06.800 recognition.

00:36:08.140 If you put me in

00:36:09.040 this situation, you

00:36:09.940 said, all right,

00:36:10.400 you're Jill, and

00:36:11.560 you're going to

00:36:11.840 have to break the

00:36:12.480 news to him, and

00:36:13.060 he's not going to

00:36:13.580 like it.

00:36:14.340 I do it on his

00:36:15.420 summer vacation,

00:36:16.520 when he has lots

00:36:18.240 of time away from

00:36:19.140 the regular work,

00:36:20.680 to process it.

00:36:21.940 I do it when he's

00:36:23.780 away from everybody

00:36:24.780 else, because if

00:36:26.120 he doesn't take it

00:36:26.880 well, you don't

00:36:27.380 want a lot of

00:36:27.840 witnesses.

00:36:29.900 And I would do

00:36:30.840 it exactly at

00:36:32.320 this time, so

00:36:33.620 there's enough

00:36:34.160 time for a

00:36:34.840 replacement to get

00:36:35.680 in, without it

00:36:37.580 being too

00:36:38.060 embarrassing.

00:36:41.080 What do you

00:36:41.640 think?

00:36:45.080 I think, to me,

00:36:46.780 it is

00:36:47.160 screamingly

00:36:47.880 obvious that

00:36:49.400 from the...

00:36:50.180 Here's the

00:36:50.700 model I'm

00:36:50.980 putting.

00:36:51.060 If you put a

00:36:52.040 political model

00:36:52.880 on this, you

00:36:54.500 can't see it.

00:36:56.500 If it's only a

00:36:57.460 political model, it's

00:36:58.420 a little bit

00:36:58.840 invisible.

00:36:59.520 If you put a

00:37:00.200 relationship model

00:37:01.400 on it, it's

00:37:01.940 obvious.

00:37:05.980 If you put a

00:37:07.700 relationship filter

00:37:09.740 on this, it's

00:37:10.380 obvious.

00:37:11.620 She must have

00:37:12.120 told him in the

00:37:14.480 last two weeks.

00:37:17.360 That's what I

00:37:17.980 think.

00:37:18.780 So we'll test.

00:37:19.460 So this will be a

00:37:20.120 good test of my

00:37:20.940 predicting.

00:37:22.720 Nothing's 100%,

00:37:23.960 but I feel pretty

00:37:25.320 confident about

00:37:25.940 this one.

00:37:27.480 That I think the

00:37:28.660 relationship filter

00:37:29.760 is screamingly

00:37:30.920 obvious on this

00:37:31.680 one.

00:37:32.760 But we'll see.

00:37:33.660 And also, anything

00:37:34.320 could change.

00:37:36.840 All right.

00:37:37.420 I saw Ben Shapiro

00:37:38.300 and some other

00:37:38.820 smart people say

00:37:39.760 that the special

00:37:41.420 counsel that's been

00:37:42.380 chosen can't be

00:37:44.660 chosen from a

00:37:46.420 government employee,

00:37:47.380 and that's what

00:37:47.820 they did.

00:37:49.540 So did they

00:37:50.960 just sort of

00:37:51.640 decide to

00:37:52.420 ignore the, I

00:37:53.760 don't know,

00:37:53.940 laws or

00:37:54.460 statutes?

00:37:56.600 Or is there

00:37:57.260 actually a

00:37:57.740 counterargument to

00:37:58.520 this?

00:37:59.200 Because to me, it

00:37:59.800 looks pretty cut and

00:38:00.500 dried.

00:38:01.540 You can't pick him

00:38:02.600 from a government

00:38:03.200 employee.

00:38:03.840 He is a government

00:38:04.480 employee.

00:38:05.080 They did pick him.

00:38:07.200 Can somebody explain

00:38:08.260 that to me?

00:38:08.700 It's not a law,

00:38:11.360 it's a statute.

00:38:12.960 So is it a

00:38:13.620 suggestion but not

00:38:14.480 a requirement?

00:38:16.100 Oh, they violated

00:38:16.900 it before.

00:38:18.240 It's a regulation,

00:38:19.200 not a requirement.

00:38:21.440 So who can

00:38:23.180 violate a

00:38:24.220 regulation?

00:38:27.200 Anybody who's

00:38:27.940 the boss?

00:38:29.340 I don't know.

00:38:30.100 So I don't know if

00:38:30.900 that's a big story

00:38:31.620 or not.

00:38:32.140 Probably not.

00:38:32.780 Do we need to

00:38:37.460 talk about the

00:38:38.580 Georgia situation

00:38:39.540 and Trump's

00:38:41.620 perfect phone

00:38:42.380 call?

00:38:43.480 Now, the

00:38:43.960 perfect phone

00:38:44.560 call to me looks

00:38:45.300 just like the

00:38:46.060 drinking bleach

00:38:46.880 hoax, the

00:38:47.560 fine people

00:38:48.140 hoax.

00:38:49.100 It's entirely

00:38:49.960 based on

00:38:50.640 intentional

00:38:51.380 misreporting,

00:38:52.800 isn't it?

00:38:54.300 They changed

00:38:55.060 the words of

00:38:55.680 what he said

00:38:56.180 and then they

00:38:57.120 changed the

00:38:57.560 context a little

00:38:58.280 bit.

00:38:58.900 If they didn't

00:38:59.460 change his

00:38:59.920 words, his

00:39:00.880 exact words,

00:39:01.700 and his

00:39:02.020 context,

00:39:02.520 it looks

00:39:03.080 completely

00:39:03.520 different.

00:39:04.980 So I guess

00:39:05.700 that's all I

00:39:06.180 would say

00:39:06.420 about it.

00:39:06.780 It's the

00:39:07.100 same trick

00:39:07.640 of taking

00:39:08.220 him out

00:39:08.480 of context.

00:39:09.960 All right,

00:39:10.400 remember every

00:39:11.180 single day I

00:39:11.940 tell you that

00:39:13.680 Ramaswamy Vivek

00:39:16.320 won the news

00:39:17.840 cycle again?

00:39:19.440 Well, here we

00:39:20.240 go again.

00:39:21.640 One of the

00:39:22.600 viral videos

00:39:23.840 is a

00:39:25.600 pansexual

00:39:27.360 LGBTQ

00:39:28.080 reporter for

00:39:29.300 some publication

00:39:30.000 got in a

00:39:32.840 conversation

00:39:33.360 and asked

00:39:33.820 Vivek some

00:39:34.840 questions quite

00:39:35.720 politely and

00:39:37.520 Vivek's answer

00:39:39.080 was so

00:39:40.840 perfect and

00:39:41.940 complete and

00:39:43.660 off the cuff,

00:39:44.900 like he wasn't

00:39:45.640 reading from

00:39:46.140 notes or

00:39:46.560 anything, and

00:39:47.860 he talked for

00:39:48.360 a while.

00:39:49.200 I mean, so it

00:39:49.780 was a really

00:39:50.480 complete, tight

00:39:52.300 little package.

00:39:53.220 Then it became

00:39:54.020 viral just because

00:39:55.020 it was the best

00:39:55.640 answer anybody's

00:39:56.440 ever seen to

00:39:56.980 that question.

00:39:58.800 Imagine being

00:39:59.540 so good at

00:40:00.260 answering a

00:40:00.840 question that

00:40:02.540 people make you

00:40:03.360 viral just

00:40:04.200 because your

00:40:04.620 answer was so

00:40:05.520 good.

00:40:06.440 You just look at

00:40:07.240 it and go,

00:40:07.560 how did you

00:40:07.960 even do that?

00:40:08.740 That was so

00:40:09.200 good, right?

00:40:10.900 And that was

00:40:11.460 just one thing

00:40:12.060 he did.

00:40:12.620 I mean, he was

00:40:13.040 rapping the

00:40:13.580 other day.

00:40:16.200 But then he

00:40:16.960 also makes

00:40:17.500 news by being

00:40:18.820 sort of the

00:40:19.320 only one who

00:40:19.800 was saying,

00:40:20.540 and I think

00:40:21.900 this is his

00:40:22.540 actual words,

00:40:24.260 Ukrainian state

00:40:25.260 affiliated companies

00:40:26.140 multi-million dollar

00:40:27.280 bribe to the

00:40:28.740 Biden family.

00:40:29.480 So he's calling

00:40:30.280 it a bribe,

00:40:31.600 and he's saying

00:40:32.280 it's somewhat

00:40:32.860 obvious that this

00:40:34.300 should have

00:40:34.640 affected his

00:40:35.400 decisions on

00:40:36.940 support for

00:40:38.280 Ukraine's war.

00:40:40.260 And he says

00:40:41.220 it directly,

00:40:42.400 which again,

00:40:43.440 makes news,

00:40:44.760 and I think

00:40:45.480 it's a perfectly

00:40:46.980 fair framing

00:40:49.460 of the situation.

00:40:50.820 He's not saying

00:40:51.780 that there's a

00:40:52.380 specific, you

00:40:53.780 know, any

00:40:54.360 specific decision,

00:40:55.400 but this

00:40:56.640 clearly would

00:40:58.040 put you in

00:40:58.720 a conflict,

00:41:00.180 bribery-looking

00:41:01.180 situation,

00:41:01.860 which he says

00:41:02.720 is impeachable.

00:41:04.900 It looks

00:41:05.500 impeachable to

00:41:06.140 me.

00:41:07.540 I mean, it

00:41:08.100 looks like the

00:41:08.600 most impeachable

00:41:09.320 thing of all

00:41:09.840 time.

00:41:10.580 It's like

00:41:10.880 perfectly

00:41:11.260 impeachable.

00:41:12.700 Well, we'll

00:41:13.040 see.

00:41:14.540 So there it

00:41:15.340 is again.

00:41:16.980 Vivek, day

00:41:17.920 after day

00:41:18.500 after day,

00:41:19.820 wins the

00:41:20.600 news cycle.

00:41:22.020 Now, how did

00:41:22.600 DeSantis do in

00:41:23.500 Iowa?

00:41:25.340 DeSantis looks

00:41:26.140 like somebody

00:41:26.680 who already

00:41:27.100 decided to

00:41:27.800 quit the

00:41:28.160 race.

00:41:30.300 Right?

00:41:31.400 Because the

00:41:32.100 other people

00:41:33.480 are, they

00:41:34.940 still have a

00:41:35.940 second bite of

00:41:36.640 the apple,

00:41:37.280 because they

00:41:37.560 still have the

00:41:38.020 vice presidency

00:41:38.660 that's sort of

00:41:39.880 up for grabs,

00:41:40.740 and then, you

00:41:41.680 know, another

00:41:42.080 chance at the

00:41:42.920 presidency.

00:41:44.020 DeSantis is not

00:41:44.920 really a

00:41:46.420 possibility as a

00:41:47.340 vice president.

00:41:48.040 Would you agree?

00:41:48.540 I don't see

00:41:49.840 any way that

00:41:50.520 DeSantis would

00:41:51.640 be a vice

00:41:52.060 presidential

00:41:52.560 shortlist.

00:41:54.500 So if DeSantis

00:41:55.720 thinks he can't

00:41:56.880 make it to the

00:41:57.780 top, it

00:42:00.540 looked like a

00:42:01.020 whole lot of

00:42:01.420 giving up this

00:42:02.060 week.

00:42:03.040 It looked like

00:42:03.920 maybe he's

00:42:04.360 already decided

00:42:05.100 that, you

00:42:06.760 know, he's

00:42:07.040 just going

00:42:07.440 through the

00:42:07.740 motions because

00:42:08.400 he has

00:42:08.700 backers and

00:42:09.700 they told him

00:42:10.980 not to quit

00:42:11.580 yet.

00:42:12.540 But of course,

00:42:13.460 I suppose

00:42:13.780 everybody's

00:42:14.320 waiting just

00:42:14.860 to see if

00:42:15.300 Trump escapes

00:42:16.640 all of his

00:42:17.200 legal problems.

00:42:20.720 But I think

00:42:21.520 Vivek will be

00:42:22.360 the, if

00:42:24.320 Trump went

00:42:25.300 away, I

00:42:25.640 think Vivek

00:42:26.180 would rise to

00:42:26.920 the top

00:42:27.880 immediately as

00:42:29.360 the person who

00:42:29.820 would get the

00:42:30.380 Trump votes.

00:42:32.240 All right.

00:42:34.800 So Trump went

00:42:35.800 after his judge

00:42:37.300 that he's going

00:42:38.260 to have for

00:42:39.360 her alleged

00:42:39.960 bias in her

00:42:41.060 past statements

00:42:41.660 about Trump.

00:42:42.640 And I would

00:42:43.280 agree that her

00:42:43.920 past statements

00:42:44.540 about Trump,

00:42:45.680 to me,

00:42:46.640 show a bias

00:42:48.480 against him.

00:42:49.620 Has anybody

00:42:50.000 read her

00:42:50.360 comments?

00:42:51.080 Because at

00:42:51.480 one part she

00:42:52.120 talked about

00:42:52.680 other people

00:42:53.780 in January

00:42:54.800 6th,

00:42:55.980 in some

00:42:56.540 public

00:42:56.860 statement,

00:42:57.600 and said

00:42:58.060 that yet

00:42:59.300 Trump remains

00:43:00.160 free.

00:43:01.500 Now that

00:43:02.160 statement is

00:43:02.960 chilling because

00:43:04.680 it's a very

00:43:05.200 clear statement

00:43:05.880 that she

00:43:06.300 believes that

00:43:07.060 he should not

00:43:07.520 be a free

00:43:08.000 man before

00:43:09.880 seeing the

00:43:10.440 evidence,

00:43:11.560 just based on

00:43:12.240 what she saw

00:43:12.700 in public.

00:43:13.160 now here's

00:43:16.440 the situation.

00:43:18.560 So the

00:43:19.140 media spent

00:43:19.900 how many

00:43:20.280 years,

00:43:20.680 like six

00:43:21.340 years,

00:43:21.780 seven years,

00:43:22.800 brainwashing the

00:43:23.620 public,

00:43:25.340 mostly Democrats,

00:43:26.280 brainwashing Democrats

00:43:27.240 into believing that

00:43:28.500 Trump is a

00:43:29.100 traitorous,

00:43:29.680 racist,

00:43:30.120 sexist.

00:43:31.260 Am I right?

00:43:32.700 He's a

00:43:33.140 traitorous,

00:43:34.380 racist,

00:43:35.040 sexist.

00:43:35.680 The news has

00:43:36.300 been telling

00:43:36.740 everybody,

00:43:37.540 mostly Democrats,

00:43:38.680 this for years.

00:43:40.040 And then the

00:43:41.520 person who is

00:43:42.280 randomly chosen

00:43:43.400 happens to be

00:43:45.280 a female

00:43:46.740 black

00:43:48.080 immigrant.

00:43:51.820 Right?

00:43:52.780 The very

00:43:53.440 groups that

00:43:54.340 the news has

00:43:55.100 been telling

00:43:55.580 everybody should

00:43:57.120 be the most

00:43:58.020 outraged that

00:44:00.640 he even

00:44:01.060 exists.

00:44:03.220 Now,

00:44:04.580 as I said

00:44:06.080 in my tweet,

00:44:07.200 if science

00:44:07.980 were real,

00:44:08.680 and I'm

00:44:09.820 pretty sure

00:44:10.260 it's not

00:44:10.740 at this

00:44:11.100 point,

00:44:12.660 and the

00:44:13.980 scientists

00:44:14.720 were not

00:44:15.860 useless

00:44:18.860 weasels,

00:44:20.760 don't you

00:44:21.420 think there

00:44:21.800 should be

00:44:22.100 some

00:44:22.380 scientist,

00:44:23.180 like a

00:44:23.600 cognitive

00:44:24.120 scientist,

00:44:25.480 who should

00:44:26.060 say,

00:44:27.100 under these

00:44:27.700 specific

00:44:28.420 situations,

00:44:29.960 you absolutely

00:44:30.940 cannot have

00:44:32.140 an immigrant

00:44:33.820 black

00:44:34.880 female

00:44:35.380 judging

00:44:35.980 Trump.

00:44:36.420 Now,

00:44:37.880 this is

00:44:38.640 not a

00:44:39.260 comment

00:44:39.540 about her

00:44:40.300 qualifications.

00:44:42.200 You've got to

00:44:42.540 hear this

00:44:42.920 clearly.

00:44:43.960 I have no

00:44:44.620 reason to

00:44:45.060 believe she's

00:44:45.500 not a

00:44:45.800 great judge.

00:44:47.120 No

00:44:47.600 indications.

00:44:48.880 I also

00:44:49.500 understand

00:44:50.260 that judges

00:44:51.680 can have

00:44:52.220 bias but

00:44:52.820 still do

00:44:53.220 their job.

00:44:54.820 Do we

00:44:55.240 agree?

00:44:56.000 This is

00:44:56.380 not a

00:44:56.720 comment about

00:44:57.320 her as

00:44:57.900 a judge,

00:44:58.480 not about

00:44:59.120 her.

00:45:00.140 It's a

00:45:00.760 general

00:45:01.120 statement

00:45:01.560 that if

00:45:02.540 you put

00:45:02.920 anybody in

00:45:03.680 this

00:45:03.880 situation,

00:45:04.500 cognitive

00:45:05.960 scientists,

00:45:07.120 if they

00:45:07.720 were not

00:45:08.080 all frauds

00:45:08.880 and weasels

00:45:09.380 and pieces

00:45:09.920 of shit,

00:45:11.460 would be

00:45:11.900 going public

00:45:12.520 and say,

00:45:12.920 look,

00:45:13.120 look,

00:45:13.320 look,

00:45:13.540 this is

00:45:14.100 really a

00:45:14.580 special

00:45:14.860 case.

00:45:15.840 You've

00:45:16.160 had the

00:45:16.520 most

00:45:16.840 powerful

00:45:17.580 brainwashing

00:45:18.420 forces,

00:45:19.660 brainwashing

00:45:20.340 half of

00:45:20.700 the country

00:45:21.160 into believing

00:45:22.280 that he's

00:45:22.880 this massive

00:45:23.660 monster,

00:45:24.980 a racist,

00:45:25.780 sexist,

00:45:26.480 immigrant,

00:45:27.300 and hating

00:45:27.620 person.

00:45:29.020 And then

00:45:29.420 you randomly

00:45:30.100 pick a

00:45:30.880 female black

00:45:32.040 immigrant to

00:45:33.560 be his

00:45:33.920 judge.

00:45:34.500 And the

00:45:35.160 rest of

00:45:35.480 the country

00:45:35.920 is supposed

00:45:36.300 to watch

00:45:36.760 this and

00:45:37.600 say,

00:45:37.860 oh,

00:45:37.940 that looked

00:45:38.280 fair to

00:45:38.640 me.

00:45:39.520 No problem

00:45:40.440 here.

00:45:41.820 I absolutely

00:45:42.980 think that

00:45:43.960 you can't

00:45:44.360 remove bias

00:45:45.300 from juries

00:45:46.440 and from

00:45:47.060 judges,

00:45:47.780 because we're

00:45:48.300 humans.

00:45:49.380 And I

00:45:49.900 absolutely

00:45:50.380 think that

00:45:50.980 even with

00:45:51.580 those biases,

00:45:52.820 you can

00:45:53.300 still get

00:45:53.700 the right

00:45:54.000 result.

00:45:55.380 But that's

00:45:55.900 when the

00:45:56.200 bias is at

00:45:57.020 normal levels.

00:45:59.560 We're not

00:45:59.960 looking at

00:46:00.400 anything normal.

00:46:02.040 The Trump

00:46:02.860 derangement

00:46:03.480 syndrome

00:46:03.920 is very

00:46:04.980 real.

00:46:06.180 It's been

00:46:06.800 studied.

00:46:08.060 There's no

00:46:08.540 question that

00:46:09.260 it's real.

00:46:10.500 And when you

00:46:10.840 see the

00:46:11.160 comments of

00:46:11.740 the judge

00:46:12.340 about he's

00:46:14.580 still free

00:46:15.140 after January

00:46:16.360 6th, you

00:46:17.980 cannot imagine

00:46:19.000 that this

00:46:20.320 would look

00:46:21.120 like a fair

00:46:21.780 trial to

00:46:22.840 anybody who's

00:46:23.440 paying attention.

00:46:25.180 And I think

00:46:25.820 that the

00:46:26.340 justicism has

00:46:27.600 an obligation

00:46:28.540 obligation to

00:46:29.500 not only

00:46:30.000 try to give

00:46:30.660 people a

00:46:31.160 fair trial,

00:46:32.100 duh, but

00:46:33.360 to make sure

00:46:33.920 it looks like

00:46:34.640 it.

00:46:35.880 Make sure it

00:46:36.740 looks like

00:46:37.220 it.

00:46:37.420 This doesn't

00:46:37.940 look like

00:46:38.400 it.

00:46:39.280 And Trump

00:46:39.840 is calling

00:46:40.340 it out

00:46:40.760 because he's

00:46:41.320 the only

00:46:41.560 one with

00:46:41.880 the balls

00:46:42.340 to say

00:46:42.900 the obvious.

00:46:44.100 It's really

00:46:44.560 obvious that

00:46:45.640 this is not

00:46:47.280 looking fair.

00:46:48.960 Now, again,

00:46:50.400 am I saying

00:46:51.240 that she is

00:46:52.500 not professional

00:46:53.880 enough to

00:46:55.780 be fair?

00:46:56.540 I'm not

00:46:56.940 saying that

00:46:57.300 at all.

00:46:58.160 I believe

00:46:58.980 that her

00:46:59.300 intentions in

00:47:00.220 all likelihood

00:47:00.760 would be to

00:47:01.460 be as fair

00:47:01.900 as possible.

00:47:03.380 I would

00:47:03.720 assume that.

00:47:05.560 But I don't

00:47:06.100 think that from

00:47:06.820 a scientific

00:47:07.520 basis, from

00:47:08.480 a scientific

00:47:09.120 perspective,

00:47:10.120 you could put

00:47:11.060 any female

00:47:12.760 black

00:47:13.400 immigrant into

00:47:15.420 this specific

00:47:16.160 job with

00:47:17.560 this specific

00:47:18.300 case of

00:47:19.980 Trump.

00:47:20.860 He's the

00:47:21.500 exception.

00:47:22.600 This can't

00:47:23.300 work.

00:47:24.880 This can't

00:47:26.080 work.

00:47:26.880 And the

00:47:27.120 only reason

00:47:27.700 we've gotten

00:47:28.160 this far

00:47:28.760 is because

00:47:30.520 scientists are

00:47:32.100 fucking

00:47:32.760 cowards.

00:47:34.700 Do you

00:47:35.380 think there's

00:47:35.840 even one

00:47:36.480 cognitive

00:47:37.000 scientist who

00:47:37.920 would back

00:47:38.420 this?

00:47:39.360 Just one.

00:47:40.940 Anywhere in

00:47:41.600 the world,

00:47:42.500 do you think

00:47:42.860 there's one

00:47:43.440 cognitive

00:47:44.020 scientist who

00:47:44.760 would say,

00:47:45.400 yeah, I

00:47:45.740 think this

00:47:46.160 is a

00:47:46.480 situation where

00:47:47.980 as long as

00:47:48.700 it's transparent

00:47:49.480 and judges

00:47:51.360 are taught to

00:47:52.060 be independent,

00:47:53.060 so this

00:47:54.480 should be

00:47:54.820 fine?

00:47:55.620 Do you

00:47:55.860 think so?

00:47:56.800 Do you

00:47:57.040 think you

00:47:57.340 could get

00:47:57.620 one actual

00:47:58.260 professional to

00:47:59.080 say that about

00:47:59.720 this?

00:48:00.700 Now, they'd

00:48:01.160 obviously say it

00:48:01.940 about trials in

00:48:03.900 general.

00:48:05.900 In general, we

00:48:07.980 do the best we

00:48:08.640 can.

00:48:09.020 But this is not

00:48:09.760 in general.

00:48:10.340 This is a very

00:48:10.820 specific situation

00:48:11.900 that violates

00:48:13.320 every historical

00:48:14.940 precedent.

00:48:16.060 There's never

00:48:16.800 been a president

00:48:17.500 like this who

00:48:19.340 has been the

00:48:20.500 subject of

00:48:21.160 massive media

00:48:22.580 brainwashing.

00:48:24.420 Massive.

00:48:25.460 And you

00:48:25.900 could prove

00:48:26.380 that the

00:48:27.000 brainwashing is

00:48:27.860 even intentional.

00:48:29.400 You could

00:48:29.740 probably find

00:48:30.320 quotes from

00:48:31.260 news executives,

00:48:32.700 et cetera, that

00:48:33.700 would prove that

00:48:35.120 it's not

00:48:35.440 accidental.

00:48:36.140 It's an actual

00:48:36.780 brainwashing

00:48:37.960 operation.

00:48:39.620 When you

00:48:40.140 saw the

00:48:40.720 fake laptop

00:48:42.000 story that it

00:48:42.760 was Russian

00:48:43.240 disinformation,

00:48:43.980 when you

00:48:45.480 see that 50

00:48:46.400 past and

00:48:48.500 current

00:48:49.100 intelligence

00:48:49.700 people signed

00:48:50.380 a letter,

00:48:51.900 is that

00:48:52.420 ordinary

00:48:53.060 brainwashing?

00:48:54.880 Is that

00:48:55.500 like a

00:48:57.100 rank and

00:48:57.860 file, you

00:48:58.500 know, all of

00:48:59.660 you could do

00:49:00.160 it?

00:49:01.060 No.

00:49:02.440 No, that is

00:49:03.420 military grade.

00:49:05.980 That is

00:49:06.900 military grade

00:49:08.180 brainwashing.

00:49:09.700 That's not

00:49:10.600 commercial grade.

00:49:12.680 Commercial grade

00:49:13.440 is advertising.

00:49:15.500 Right now, I'm

00:49:16.880 doing commercial

00:49:17.700 grade persuasion.

00:49:20.440 But the

00:49:21.360 government does

00:49:22.280 military grade.

00:49:24.200 That's what the

00:49:24.760 laptop persuasion

00:49:26.000 was.

00:49:26.600 How about the

00:49:27.260 Russia collusion

00:49:28.120 hoax?

00:49:29.320 Was that like

00:49:30.160 commercial grade?

00:49:31.400 No, that was

00:49:31.960 military grade.

00:49:33.300 That was

00:49:33.660 absolutely

00:49:34.180 military grade.

00:49:35.680 How about

00:49:36.140 the

00:49:36.460 fine people

00:49:39.060 hoax?

00:49:40.760 The fine

00:49:41.180 people hoax?

00:49:41.860 Do you think

00:49:42.160 that was just

00:49:42.620 commercial grade?

00:49:44.440 No.

00:49:45.440 No, that was

00:49:45.840 military grade.

00:49:47.620 So you're

00:49:48.480 looking at

00:49:48.840 military grade

00:49:50.380 brainwashing

00:49:51.740 that has

00:49:53.120 clearly affected

00:49:54.040 one segment of

00:49:55.620 the country

00:49:56.040 more than

00:49:56.500 others.

00:49:57.320 I would argue

00:49:58.060 both sides are

00:49:58.700 being brainwashed,

00:49:59.500 but in different

00:49:59.960 ways.

00:50:00.820 It's not always

00:50:01.540 the same level

00:50:03.120 of danger,

00:50:03.860 depending on the

00:50:04.420 brainwashing.

00:50:05.480 So for example,

00:50:06.280 Trump is

00:50:06.720 brainwashing his

00:50:07.680 team into

00:50:08.840 believing he did

00:50:09.820 better than he

00:50:10.380 did.

00:50:10.580 But we just

00:50:12.360 call that

00:50:12.700 politics.

00:50:14.300 We expect

00:50:14.920 that, right?

00:50:16.140 But Trump

00:50:16.640 does a good

00:50:17.080 job.

00:50:17.960 He actually

00:50:18.560 has people

00:50:19.300 very convinced

00:50:20.020 of his

00:50:20.740 successes.

00:50:22.840 Which, by the

00:50:23.440 way, he did

00:50:23.880 have a lot of

00:50:24.340 successes.

00:50:26.980 All right.

00:50:27.860 Well, this is

00:50:28.700 completely unfair.

00:50:29.960 Trump is 100%

00:50:31.100 right.

00:50:31.800 I agree that he

00:50:32.620 should go as

00:50:33.120 hard as possible

00:50:34.040 at her.

00:50:34.440 In most

00:50:37.220 situations, I

00:50:38.060 would say no.

00:50:39.160 But in this

00:50:39.840 specific situation

00:50:41.100 of Trump and

00:50:43.200 years of

00:50:43.820 massive military

00:50:45.120 grade brainwashing,

00:50:46.240 yes, he should

00:50:47.400 go right at this

00:50:48.200 as hard as he

00:50:48.740 is.

00:50:49.560 Totally agree.

00:50:51.180 Did I talk

00:50:51.760 yesterday about

00:50:52.360 Bill Maher?

00:50:53.640 Apparently, he

00:50:54.480 knows the fine

00:50:55.500 people hoax was

00:50:56.260 a hoax.

00:50:58.260 So he said it

00:50:59.240 on his club

00:51:01.140 random.

00:51:01.980 He actually

00:51:02.340 said that he

00:51:03.940 doesn't like

00:51:04.460 being gaslit

00:51:05.560 and that this

00:51:07.520 was obviously

00:51:08.100 a made-up

00:51:08.580 thing.

00:51:09.260 But even

00:51:09.680 though he

00:51:10.100 knows the

00:51:10.620 story is

00:51:11.060 fake, he

00:51:12.960 still seemed

00:51:13.860 to believe,

00:51:14.440 I don't want

00:51:14.780 to read his

00:51:15.200 mind, but

00:51:15.720 based on what

00:51:16.240 he said, he

00:51:17.240 seemed to

00:51:17.740 indicate that

00:51:18.980 he thought

00:51:19.440 Trump actually

00:51:20.220 said something

00:51:21.060 like that.

00:51:22.420 But his

00:51:22.860 defense is,

00:51:24.180 you know,

00:51:25.320 that it's

00:51:25.980 sort of taken

00:51:26.440 out of context

00:51:27.100 or something.

00:51:27.600 I don't know.

00:51:28.280 But he

00:51:28.900 actually didn't

00:51:29.600 say it.

00:51:31.300 Like, Bill

00:51:32.100 is almost

00:51:32.600 there.

00:51:33.940 He thinks

00:51:34.940 he did say

00:51:35.580 it, but it

00:51:35.940 was, like,

00:51:36.400 over-interpreted

00:51:37.320 or misinterpreted

00:51:38.220 or something

00:51:38.520 like that.

00:51:39.580 Or, no,

00:51:40.680 here's what he

00:51:41.060 said.

00:51:41.700 I'm sorry.

00:51:43.300 I'm botching

00:51:44.560 this story.

00:51:46.200 What Marr said

00:51:47.080 was that Trump

00:51:48.520 had so often

00:51:49.540 clarified that

00:51:50.600 he disavowed

00:51:51.480 Nazis that

00:51:54.380 that should be

00:51:55.100 taken as more

00:51:56.560 of the truth

00:51:57.980 than the one

00:51:59.100 thing he said

00:51:59.620 that didn't

00:51:59.940 sound good.

00:52:00.460 Now, that's

00:52:01.700 not really

00:52:02.240 the argument.

00:52:03.840 The real

00:52:04.280 argument is

00:52:04.960 he didn't

00:52:05.260 ever say

00:52:05.780 it.

00:52:06.840 And literally,

00:52:07.520 he said

00:52:07.920 aggressively,

00:52:09.940 clearly, and

00:52:10.780 immediately the

00:52:11.680 opposite of

00:52:12.340 what was

00:52:12.680 reported.

00:52:14.220 That's really

00:52:15.060 different than,

00:52:16.840 oh, he has

00:52:17.280 said before he

00:52:18.020 disavowed them,

00:52:18.880 so you should

00:52:19.220 take that as

00:52:20.600 true.

00:52:21.360 That's the

00:52:22.100 weakest, not

00:52:24.160 quite accurate

00:52:25.060 defense.

00:52:25.460 defense, but

00:52:26.920 at the very

00:52:27.400 least, at

00:52:29.460 the least,

00:52:31.000 Marr knows

00:52:31.500 he's being

00:52:31.880 gaslit on

00:52:32.580 this topic.

00:52:33.960 That's

00:52:34.260 progress.

00:52:35.540 That's a

00:52:35.940 little bit of

00:52:36.360 progress.

00:52:37.320 Not nearly

00:52:38.080 the entire

00:52:39.340 story was

00:52:39.920 reversed and

00:52:40.600 faked, but

00:52:41.580 it's progress.

00:52:44.540 All right,

00:52:45.540 you've heard

00:52:46.460 people say

00:52:47.540 that the

00:52:48.040 windmills,

00:52:49.020 the offshore

00:52:49.760 windmills,

00:52:50.640 are bad for

00:52:51.600 the whales and

00:52:52.760 maybe some of

00:52:53.520 the other sea

00:52:53.960 life.

00:52:54.220 And I

00:52:55.300 never knew

00:52:55.720 what to

00:52:56.020 think about

00:52:56.400 that, but

00:52:56.760 one of the

00:52:57.140 things that

00:52:57.540 I use as

00:52:58.140 my BS

00:53:00.220 filter is

00:53:02.060 when the

00:53:02.480 science matches

00:53:03.660 observation.

00:53:06.060 Right?

00:53:07.260 So we

00:53:07.880 have, in

00:53:08.780 our own

00:53:09.620 community here,

00:53:12.300 we see you,

00:53:14.360 Erica.

00:53:15.040 So we have

00:53:15.860 a real-life

00:53:16.660 human being

00:53:17.320 that I can

00:53:17.900 verify as a

00:53:18.880 real-life

00:53:19.280 human being

00:53:19.920 who says

00:53:21.340 they've seen

00:53:21.980 their 61st

00:53:23.460 dead whale

00:53:24.820 on their

00:53:25.360 beach.

00:53:29.620 61.

00:53:31.460 This is

00:53:32.200 one person

00:53:32.820 with one

00:53:33.340 beach.

00:53:35.100 And

00:53:35.340 offshore,

00:53:36.000 there are

00:53:36.380 apparently

00:53:36.760 some newish

00:53:37.860 windmills.

00:53:40.620 Can you

00:53:41.340 imagine any

00:53:42.140 beach that

00:53:42.720 ever had

00:53:43.200 61 dead

00:53:44.100 whales?

00:53:45.060 I don't

00:53:45.580 know what

00:53:45.760 the time

00:53:46.080 period is,

00:53:46.740 but I

00:53:47.060 imagine just

00:53:47.540 a few

00:53:47.800 years.

00:53:49.660 Yeah.

00:53:50.300 That doesn't

00:53:51.080 look like a

00:53:51.740 coincidence,

00:53:52.680 does it?

00:53:53.460 Because I

00:53:54.480 don't think

00:53:54.840 there were

00:53:55.160 61 dead

00:53:56.000 whales where

00:53:56.600 there are

00:53:56.940 no windmills.

00:53:59.960 So I'm

00:54:01.660 going to

00:54:01.840 say, you

00:54:02.360 know, I

00:54:03.120 didn't see

00:54:03.520 the whales,

00:54:04.860 and I

00:54:05.820 wouldn't

00:54:06.020 understand the

00:54:06.660 science if

00:54:07.120 I saw it.

00:54:08.320 But when

00:54:08.780 you've got

00:54:09.100 the science

00:54:09.700 and the

00:54:10.120 observation

00:54:10.700 matching like

00:54:12.520 that, and

00:54:13.820 then you've

00:54:14.140 got Michael

00:54:14.680 Schellenberger,

00:54:15.600 who's, you

00:54:16.100 know, he's

00:54:16.960 on this

00:54:17.320 case, and

00:54:18.100 he's basically

00:54:19.360 untangling it

00:54:20.440 for you.

00:54:20.800 If you've

00:54:21.640 got those

00:54:22.100 three things

00:54:22.680 happening,

00:54:24.240 Schellenberger

00:54:24.840 is weighed

00:54:25.340 in, he's

00:54:25.820 done the

00:54:26.120 work, he's

00:54:27.480 very highly

00:54:28.000 credible, very

00:54:29.000 highly credible.

00:54:30.520 You've got

00:54:30.940 observation that's

00:54:31.980 through the

00:54:32.500 roof.

00:54:33.520 You know, if

00:54:33.840 you saw

00:54:34.260 three whales,

00:54:35.960 would three

00:54:36.520 whales tell

00:54:38.300 the story?

00:54:39.040 I don't

00:54:39.300 know.

00:54:40.220 Three seems

00:54:40.880 like a lot,

00:54:41.500 actually.

00:54:42.180 If I heard

00:54:42.560 the three

00:54:43.080 whales, you

00:54:44.340 know, that

00:54:44.580 would get

00:54:45.000 my...

00:54:45.300 You tell

00:54:45.880 me there's

00:54:46.300 61 whales.

00:54:48.740 61?

00:54:50.300 I'm not

00:54:51.000 going to

00:54:51.180 ignore that.

00:54:52.440 And then

00:54:52.880 the science

00:54:53.560 seems to

00:54:53.980 back it.

00:54:54.600 So you've

00:54:55.060 got three

00:54:55.720 points of

00:54:56.480 credibility

00:54:56.980 here that's

00:54:59.080 unusual.

00:55:00.060 That's an

00:55:00.660 unusually high

00:55:01.680 level of

00:55:02.200 credibility.

00:55:03.220 Now, I

00:55:05.120 don't want

00:55:05.480 to say it's

00:55:05.800 100% proven

00:55:07.080 because nothing

00:55:07.920 in our world

00:55:08.440 ever is, but

00:55:09.760 wow, I

00:55:11.840 wouldn't worry

00:55:12.300 about this

00:55:12.760 one.

00:55:13.420 You know,

00:55:13.620 those signals

00:55:14.180 are pretty

00:55:14.540 glaring.

00:55:15.880 All right.

00:55:18.440 Do you

00:55:19.200 think that

00:55:19.580 the world

00:55:19.900 has more

00:55:21.580 fires or

00:55:22.160 fewer fires?

00:55:23.840 Bjorn

00:55:24.180 Lomburg

00:55:24.820 says that

00:55:27.060 you're talking

00:55:28.760 about the

00:55:29.180 reinsurers.

00:55:30.580 So some

00:55:31.320 people are

00:55:31.700 saying, hey,

00:55:32.880 there must

00:55:33.780 be more

00:55:34.200 natural disasters

00:55:35.200 caused by

00:55:35.760 climate change

00:55:36.520 because the

00:55:37.760 reinsurers

00:55:38.620 don't want

00:55:39.640 to be in

00:55:40.440 the insurance

00:55:40.840 business.

00:55:41.700 So they're

00:55:42.260 afraid that

00:55:42.740 the climate

00:55:43.120 change will

00:55:43.720 be too

00:55:44.540 bad.

00:55:44.820 Do you

00:55:45.700 see anything

00:55:46.080 wrong with

00:55:46.480 that argument?

00:55:48.320 So the

00:55:48.740 things we

00:55:49.200 know is

00:55:49.800 that the

00:55:50.040 insurance

00:55:50.460 business,

00:55:51.460 the reinsurers,

00:55:52.880 the insurance

00:55:53.580 business is

00:55:54.620 too afraid of

00:55:56.720 climate change

00:55:57.560 risks from

00:55:59.420 natural disasters.

00:56:00.980 So that

00:56:01.720 must be

00:56:02.100 pretty credible

00:56:02.720 that climate

00:56:03.460 change is

00:56:04.040 real, must

00:56:05.620 be real,

00:56:06.420 because the

00:56:07.800 insurance

00:56:08.200 companies are

00:56:08.860 the most

00:56:09.580 realistic players

00:56:11.300 anywhere.

00:56:12.020 because they

00:56:13.260 don't get

00:56:13.620 the insurance

00:56:14.640 companies go

00:56:15.340 out of

00:56:15.580 business if

00:56:16.900 they're trying

00:56:17.920 to gaslight

00:56:18.600 you.

00:56:19.360 They can

00:56:19.800 only use

00:56:20.440 real numbers

00:56:21.160 as best as

00:56:22.300 they can

00:56:22.680 understand them

00:56:23.760 because otherwise

00:56:24.660 they go out of

00:56:25.140 business.

00:56:26.120 They can't just

00:56:26.580 make shit up.

00:56:28.320 So did they

00:56:28.820 just make stuff

00:56:29.500 up here?

00:56:31.380 Let me tell you

00:56:32.180 what's missing

00:56:32.700 from the story.

00:56:34.020 How many of you

00:56:34.880 know what's

00:56:35.260 missing from the

00:56:35.920 story that

00:56:36.720 changes it

00:56:37.360 totally?

00:56:38.520 What's missing

00:56:39.180 from the

00:56:39.560 story?

00:56:43.180 The price of

00:56:44.060 real estate.

00:56:45.660 The price of

00:56:46.140 real estate.

00:56:47.020 Let's say you're

00:56:47.760 in the insurance

00:56:48.300 business and

00:56:48.940 somebody builds

00:56:49.580 a house on

00:56:50.240 the ocean and

00:56:51.400 that house is

00:56:52.060 worth half a

00:56:52.660 million dollars.

00:56:54.360 You say,

00:56:54.820 yeah, I mean

00:56:55.820 if something

00:56:56.180 happens to that

00:56:56.860 house we can

00:56:57.460 afford to pay

00:56:58.860 that half a

00:56:59.400 million dollars.

00:57:00.180 And then a

00:57:00.800 bunch of people

00:57:01.320 build on the

00:57:03.040 shore and each

00:57:04.260 of them is half

00:57:04.840 a million dollar

00:57:05.360 house, let's

00:57:06.020 say.

00:57:06.720 And the

00:57:07.020 insurance

00:57:07.340 company still

00:57:07.960 says, well,

00:57:08.900 that's more

00:57:09.520 than I can

00:57:10.000 handle.

00:57:11.020 Like, that's a

00:57:11.600 lot of houses.

00:57:12.600 But what I do

00:57:13.420 is I sell my

00:57:15.300 insurance into

00:57:16.020 what's called

00:57:16.540 the reinsurer

00:57:17.360 market.

00:57:18.300 So basically,

00:57:19.440 you can spread

00:57:20.460 your risk among

00:57:21.280 other entities.

00:57:23.060 So even if all

00:57:23.920 of the homes

00:57:24.420 there got taken

00:57:27.640 out by a

00:57:28.060 hurricane, if

00:57:29.020 every one of

00:57:29.560 them went,

00:57:30.820 you're still

00:57:31.240 okay because

00:57:32.380 you didn't take

00:57:33.160 on all the

00:57:33.840 risk yourself.

00:57:34.860 You sold some

00:57:35.800 of the risk to

00:57:36.420 other people who

00:57:37.140 shared it in

00:57:37.640 the risk.

00:57:38.120 So everybody's

00:57:38.720 okay.

00:57:40.180 So far,

00:57:40.960 everything's good

00:57:41.480 and everybody

00:57:41.820 has insurance.

00:57:43.200 Now, let's

00:57:44.700 say that the

00:57:45.300 risk of a

00:57:46.640 climate change

00:57:47.360 makes the

00:57:48.400 risk of your

00:57:48.940 house going

00:57:49.480 away, your

00:57:49.900 half million

00:57:50.400 dollar house,

00:57:51.160 goes up

00:57:52.000 30%.

00:57:53.420 Can you still

00:57:54.980 get insurance?

00:57:56.920 Oh, probably.

00:57:58.560 Probably.

00:58:00.400 Yeah, you

00:58:01.020 probably could.

00:58:02.040 Now let's say

00:58:02.840 that your half

00:58:03.420 million dollar

00:58:03.980 house turns

00:58:05.340 into a

00:58:05.860 20 million

00:58:06.440 dollar house

00:58:07.080 because maybe

00:58:10.040 a little bit

00:58:10.760 of it is

00:58:11.500 inflation, but

00:58:13.260 also houses

00:58:14.000 are rebuilt by

00:58:14.880 even richer

00:58:15.480 people who

00:58:16.180 want, you

00:58:17.000 know, ocean

00:58:17.480 beach.

00:58:18.940 So now the

00:58:19.500 insurer says,

00:58:21.420 uh, I can't

00:58:22.880 even insure

00:58:23.360 one house.

00:58:25.500 The real estate's

00:58:26.440 too expensive.

00:58:27.300 I can't even.

00:58:28.080 And even if I

00:58:29.100 tried to insure,

00:58:30.200 you know, a

00:58:30.840 bunch of

00:58:31.140 houses and

00:58:32.020 try to spread

00:58:32.660 that risk with

00:58:33.420 the reinsurers,

00:58:35.220 it's too big.

00:58:36.720 It's just the

00:58:37.240 numbers are too

00:58:37.860 big.

00:58:38.860 So that's

00:58:40.500 always left

00:58:40.920 out of the

00:58:41.240 story.

00:58:42.620 The price of

00:58:43.740 real estate

00:58:44.300 should make

00:58:45.600 insurance

00:58:46.380 impractical at

00:58:47.560 some point.

00:58:49.000 They can't

00:58:49.820 charge enough

00:58:50.500 to be sure

00:58:51.860 they'll get

00:58:52.220 their money

00:58:52.580 back.

00:58:53.520 Now when

00:58:53.960 insurance

00:58:54.680 companies say

00:58:55.440 they're pulling

00:58:56.020 out, you

00:58:58.160 haven't interpreted

00:58:59.180 that to mean

00:58:59.920 they don't

00:59:00.320 want to sell

00:59:00.900 insurance there,

00:59:01.620 right?

00:59:02.220 Nothing like

00:59:02.720 that's happening.

00:59:03.940 The insurance

00:59:04.480 companies that

00:59:05.080 are pulling

00:59:05.460 out, they

00:59:06.460 totally want

00:59:07.180 to sell you

00:59:07.620 insurance, even

00:59:09.200 no matter how

00:59:09.840 big your house

00:59:10.380 is.

00:59:11.500 But they want

00:59:12.420 you to pay a

00:59:13.500 market rate for

00:59:14.440 it, and there's

00:59:15.020 no way you

00:59:15.500 will.

00:59:17.140 It's just too

00:59:17.960 expensive.

00:59:19.680 So when you

00:59:22.200 see the stories

00:59:22.920 about insurers

00:59:23.740 pulling out,

00:59:24.900 make sure that

00:59:25.820 you're also

00:59:26.340 seeing the

00:59:26.800 context that the

00:59:27.700 cost of real

00:59:28.460 estate,

00:59:29.180 is so high

00:59:30.620 that it's

00:59:32.380 hard for an

00:59:32.820 insurer to

00:59:33.380 just even

00:59:33.760 afford losses

00:59:34.900 at that

00:59:35.300 scale.

00:59:38.100 And then

00:59:38.760 some of it

00:59:39.260 you have to

00:59:39.640 think might

00:59:40.200 be brainwashing

00:59:42.080 about climate

00:59:43.240 change.

00:59:43.700 They may have

00:59:44.140 convinced

00:59:44.540 themselves it's

00:59:45.280 really about

00:59:45.780 climate when

00:59:47.120 it might more

00:59:47.960 be about the

00:59:48.800 cost of real

00:59:49.360 estate going

00:59:49.800 up.

00:59:51.480 All right.

00:59:53.220 But there

00:59:53.980 are not more

00:59:54.540 fires or

00:59:55.320 catastrophes.

00:59:56.840 That's mostly

00:59:57.960 media bullshit.

01:00:00.500 All right.

01:00:01.740 DARPA is

01:00:03.260 developing a

01:00:04.260 screening tool

01:00:05.200 to detect

01:00:05.900 risk of

01:00:07.140 suicide,

01:00:08.180 primarily in

01:00:10.140 service people,

01:00:10.940 because did you

01:00:11.500 know that since

01:00:12.120 2001, more

01:00:13.660 than 30,000 U.S.

01:00:15.040 active duty

01:00:15.660 members and

01:00:16.260 veterans have

01:00:16.880 died from

01:00:17.340 suicide?

01:00:17.760 30,000.

01:00:23.100 That would be

01:00:24.300 three-fifths the

01:00:28.860 size of the

01:00:29.440 Vietnam War,

01:00:30.800 which was

01:00:33.540 50,000.

01:00:35.980 Wow.

01:00:37.220 So I'm not

01:00:38.080 sure I knew

01:00:38.620 how big a

01:00:39.260 problem this

01:00:39.760 was.

01:00:40.220 You know,

01:00:40.400 I hear in

01:00:41.140 the news all

01:00:41.600 the time that

01:00:42.400 military suicides

01:00:43.680 are higher than

01:00:44.560 ever.

01:00:45.500 You know,

01:00:45.780 that's alarming,

01:00:46.960 but I wasn't

01:00:48.140 really aware of

01:00:48.900 the scale.

01:00:51.040 The scale is

01:00:52.060 way different.

01:00:53.380 I mean,

01:00:54.060 now add the

01:00:54.900 PTSD people,

01:00:56.460 the people who

01:00:57.100 are living a

01:00:57.700 life, you

01:00:58.820 know, maybe

01:00:59.120 they wish they

01:00:59.600 were dead.

01:01:00.740 That's a lot of

01:01:01.800 people who are

01:01:02.580 dead-like that

01:01:05.740 we don't count as

01:01:07.020 victims of a

01:01:08.060 war.

01:01:09.620 You know,

01:01:10.020 and maybe that's

01:01:10.700 a problem.

01:01:11.240 Maybe we should

01:01:11.760 be able to

01:01:12.340 calculate how

01:01:13.140 many people are

01:01:13.700 going to commit

01:01:14.120 suicide after

01:01:15.020 any military

01:01:15.620 action, and

01:01:16.960 maybe we should

01:01:17.620 say, all right,

01:01:18.900 this military

01:01:19.440 action is likely

01:01:20.360 to, you know,

01:01:21.460 take 5,000

01:01:22.300 lives today and

01:01:24.100 30,000 over the

01:01:26.020 next 20 years,

01:01:26.900 or something like

01:01:27.940 that.

01:01:30.560 But there's an

01:01:31.640 interesting side

01:01:32.720 element here.

01:01:33.260 The tool that

01:01:33.800 they're going to

01:01:34.180 use to screen

01:01:34.960 for early signs

01:01:36.580 of suicide is

01:01:38.620 actually a scan

01:01:39.400 of your brain.

01:01:39.980 so they're

01:01:42.620 going to ask

01:01:43.080 you questions

01:01:43.780 that would be

01:01:44.360 relevant, you

01:01:45.380 know, to the

01:01:45.700 topic of taking

01:01:46.420 your life, and

01:01:47.540 then they would

01:01:48.320 look at your

01:01:49.020 brain and see

01:01:50.000 if you're lying.

01:01:51.300 So, for

01:01:51.760 example, if you

01:01:53.200 said, hey,

01:01:54.520 Bob, you've

01:01:56.320 been complaining

01:01:56.860 a lot, things

01:01:57.840 aren't going

01:01:58.240 well, have you

01:01:59.300 ever thought of

01:01:59.860 taking your life?

01:02:01.620 And then Bob

01:02:02.300 says, no, no,

01:02:03.440 no, no.

01:02:04.820 Now, if Bob

01:02:05.660 says yes, then

01:02:07.480 this screening

01:02:08.100 process has already

01:02:09.080 worked.

01:02:09.980 Oh, we found

01:02:10.640 one.

01:02:11.120 Bob just said

01:02:11.680 yes, he thought

01:02:12.220 about it.

01:02:13.140 But if Bob

01:02:13.780 says no, they

01:02:16.540 can look at his

01:02:17.260 brain and they

01:02:18.880 can tell if he's

01:02:19.600 lying.

01:02:22.200 So that would

01:02:22.900 be another yes.

01:02:24.200 So then Bob

01:02:25.060 can get some

01:02:25.620 help, maybe.

01:02:26.900 Now, on one

01:02:27.720 hand, I say to

01:02:28.420 myself, wow, this

01:02:29.360 would be amazing

01:02:29.900 if you could

01:02:30.460 shortcut this

01:02:31.500 problem and get

01:02:32.560 them the treatment

01:02:33.300 they need, which

01:02:34.620 as a patriot, I'm

01:02:37.460 especially interested

01:02:38.380 that anybody who

01:02:39.300 went to war,

01:02:39.980 war, or was

01:02:40.900 any part of the

01:02:41.640 war machine, they

01:02:43.120 should get

01:02:43.480 everything that

01:02:44.120 they can get.

01:02:48.020 But the scary

01:02:48.940 part is they're

01:02:49.640 building a lie

01:02:50.700 detector.

01:02:52.720 So instead of

01:02:53.700 the ones that are

01:02:55.240 not allowed in

01:02:56.000 court, you know,

01:02:56.680 the standard lie

01:02:57.420 detector, I think

01:02:58.600 you know they're

01:02:59.120 not allowed in

01:02:59.740 court, and the

01:03:00.940 reason they're not

01:03:01.480 allowed in court is

01:03:02.240 that they're not

01:03:02.940 reliable.

01:03:03.440 example, the way a

01:03:05.320 lie detector works, and

01:03:07.200 I probably shouldn't

01:03:08.060 give away the

01:03:08.620 secret, the way a

01:03:10.860 lie detector works is

01:03:12.120 fooling you into

01:03:13.160 thinking it works.

01:03:15.240 That's the active

01:03:16.160 process.

01:03:16.980 The active process is

01:03:18.300 not the machine

01:03:18.960 reading your vitals.

01:03:21.000 The active process is

01:03:22.400 the person who uses

01:03:23.920 the machine BSing

01:03:26.040 you into thinking it's

01:03:27.820 going to work.

01:03:28.340 Because if you think

01:03:30.340 it's going to work,

01:03:31.700 and then they ask

01:03:32.400 you, did you kill

01:03:33.860 the hobo?

01:03:35.680 And you're like,

01:03:36.240 shit, shit, shit, I'm

01:03:37.160 hooked up to this

01:03:37.780 thing, it's totally

01:03:38.320 going to, it's going

01:03:39.160 to get me, it's going

01:03:39.700 to get me, it's going

01:03:40.340 to get me, then your

01:03:40.800 vitals go crazy on the

01:03:42.080 machine.

01:03:43.500 And then the

01:03:44.040 operator, still not

01:03:45.520 science, still not

01:03:47.560 science, because you

01:03:48.600 could be going crazy

01:03:49.420 for an unrelated

01:03:50.040 reason.

01:03:51.060 You may be afraid

01:03:52.100 that you would get

01:03:52.720 caught, right?

01:03:54.020 The real problem

01:03:54.780 might be that you're

01:03:55.480 afraid of getting

01:03:57.020 caught, and that

01:03:58.100 elevates your

01:03:59.020 vitals.

01:04:00.940 So that's just one

01:04:02.440 reason they're not

01:04:03.180 allowed in court,

01:04:04.240 because they're not

01:04:04.880 science, right?

01:04:06.660 So along the not

01:04:07.920 science level, so

01:04:09.020 let's say that the

01:04:09.940 person knows they're

01:04:10.880 lying, and so their

01:04:12.560 vitals go crazy.

01:04:14.340 And then the

01:04:14.920 operator says, well,

01:04:17.880 yeah, the machine

01:04:19.560 has caught deception.

01:04:22.180 Would you like to

01:04:23.120 modify that statement?

01:04:25.180 And then the

01:04:25.680 person's like, shit,

01:04:26.560 shit, maybe I can

01:04:27.720 say something that's

01:04:28.500 not exactly

01:04:29.340 admitting it, but

01:04:31.480 maybe I can beat

01:04:32.860 the machine.

01:04:33.680 And then they try to

01:04:34.740 lie a little bit

01:04:35.560 more.

01:04:36.540 And then the

01:04:37.100 operator says, okay,

01:04:38.920 that was an obvious

01:04:39.680 lie.

01:04:41.340 Let's say it is.

01:04:43.880 It appears that

01:04:44.880 you're sending all

01:04:45.860 the signals of

01:04:46.760 lying.

01:04:48.540 And then you just

01:04:49.440 watch the person,

01:04:50.320 how they react,

01:04:51.200 right?

01:04:51.420 So the idea is to

01:04:53.340 convince somebody that

01:04:54.480 they've been caught

01:04:55.080 lying, and then

01:04:57.040 they'll maybe

01:04:57.840 confess, right?

01:04:59.600 But if you walked in

01:05:00.740 knowing that that's

01:05:01.800 how it works, if you

01:05:03.580 put me in the

01:05:04.840 machine, it

01:05:06.580 wouldn't matter what

01:05:07.620 the machine said.

01:05:09.560 You know, if the

01:05:10.260 operator said to me,

01:05:11.060 oh, it's going

01:05:11.480 crazy, I'd say, what

01:05:13.060 would you expect when

01:05:14.600 you use something that's

01:05:15.700 not based on science,

01:05:16.900 and you put my

01:05:18.600 life at risk with

01:05:20.300 a machine that you

01:05:21.160 know is not even

01:05:22.080 allowed in court

01:05:22.940 because it's not

01:05:23.740 reliable, if that

01:05:25.120 fucking thing gives

01:05:26.060 you the wrong

01:05:26.820 indication, you're

01:05:28.160 going to go tell

01:05:28.660 people I'm guilty.

01:05:30.000 You think I'm going

01:05:30.720 to sit here all

01:05:31.500 calm and put up

01:05:34.580 with this pseudoscience?

01:05:36.340 Why don't you read

01:05:37.000 my goddamn

01:05:37.760 horoscope and decide

01:05:39.380 if I should be in

01:05:40.120 jail?

01:05:42.200 All right.

01:05:42.660 So that's how my

01:05:43.940 lie detector would

01:05:44.840 go.

01:05:45.480 I would attack the

01:05:46.500 lie detector guy

01:05:47.300 and I would make

01:05:48.720 him defend his

01:05:49.580 non-science and I

01:05:51.280 would put him on

01:05:51.880 trial and I would

01:05:53.120 tell him he's a

01:05:53.660 liar.

01:05:54.880 I would say, are

01:05:55.400 you telling me this

01:05:55.920 works?

01:05:56.800 Well, you know,

01:05:57.660 there's an indication

01:05:58.520 that overtaught, no,

01:06:00.160 does this work?

01:06:01.540 Well, you know, many

01:06:02.680 people have used it in

01:06:03.820 many situations, no,

01:06:05.900 fucker, does this

01:06:08.000 work?

01:06:10.140 And he'd have to

01:06:11.020 lie to me.

01:06:13.800 So I would actually

01:06:14.860 make the lie

01:06:15.560 detective guy lie to

01:06:16.780 me and I would

01:06:18.660 just say, look,

01:06:20.660 it's all bullshit

01:06:21.700 and this guy's a

01:06:22.580 liar.

01:06:24.320 Here's what he

01:06:24.940 said.

01:06:25.340 It's on tape.

01:06:26.160 Because they would

01:06:26.720 usually videotape the

01:06:27.900 thing just in case.

01:06:29.540 So you'd say, look,

01:06:30.160 I've got him on tape

01:06:30.980 lying.

01:06:31.480 He says this shit

01:06:32.120 works.

01:06:33.640 We have a hundred

01:06:35.000 years of science that

01:06:35.900 says it doesn't work.

01:06:37.400 And this guy just

01:06:38.080 told me it does.

01:06:39.620 So, you know, you've

01:06:40.720 got a liar here.

01:06:41.960 You're worried about

01:06:42.700 my lie.

01:06:43.340 This guy's on video

01:06:44.700 lying.

01:06:47.940 All right.

01:06:48.640 So that can be a

01:06:49.880 problem if they come

01:06:50.680 up with an actual

01:06:51.620 lie detector that

01:06:52.400 works, unlike the

01:06:53.520 current models.

01:06:54.800 Hey, let's talk

01:06:55.460 about that Ukrainian

01:06:56.820 offensive.

01:06:58.640 So the name

01:06:59.760 Victoria Newland

01:07:01.780 comes up in the

01:07:03.600 news all the time,

01:07:04.620 mostly on social

01:07:05.320 media, it seems.

01:07:07.040 And I hear all

01:07:08.040 these accusations

01:07:09.080 of her, what are

01:07:11.660 the accusations?

01:07:12.640 That she's, I

01:07:13.540 don't know, neocon

01:07:14.380 and she likes wars

01:07:15.620 or something?

01:07:17.000 Is that what we

01:07:17.660 think?

01:07:20.740 All right.

01:07:21.720 So here's something

01:07:22.820 Glenn Greenwald

01:07:24.200 pointed out.

01:07:25.800 In a tweet, he

01:07:26.460 said, the U.S.

01:07:27.480 began openly

01:07:28.260 touting NATO's

01:07:29.460 expansion into

01:07:30.420 Ukraine in 2008

01:07:32.160 under Bush.

01:07:33.840 That was when

01:07:34.920 now CIA director

01:07:36.240 Bill Burns wrote

01:07:37.620 his memo warning

01:07:38.680 that was a red

01:07:39.600 line for all

01:07:40.520 Russia, not

01:07:41.600 just Putin, all

01:07:43.300 Russia, and

01:07:44.280 would trigger war

01:07:45.260 in Crimea and

01:07:46.160 Donbass.

01:07:47.900 And then

01:07:48.160 Greenwald says,

01:07:50.800 guess who was

01:07:51.460 the U.S.

01:07:51.940 ambassador to

01:07:52.720 NATO then?

01:07:54.700 Victoria Newland.

01:07:57.060 So Victoria Newland

01:07:58.540 was central to the

01:08:01.400 NATO expansion in

01:08:02.540 Ukraine and then

01:08:05.040 was ambassador to

01:08:06.540 Ukraine?

01:08:06.900 was she ambassador

01:08:09.360 to Ukraine?

01:08:15.720 UN or UN

01:08:18.820 ambassador?

01:08:20.860 I don't know.

01:08:21.540 So here's what I

01:08:23.300 know and what I

01:08:24.160 don't know.

01:08:25.020 What I know is her

01:08:26.080 name comes up a lot

01:08:27.140 when there's something

01:08:29.120 sketchy about Ukraine

01:08:30.540 or war or Russia.

01:08:31.480 I don't have any

01:08:33.940 personally, I don't

01:08:35.600 have any specific

01:08:36.680 accusations.

01:08:38.880 Is there a specific

01:08:40.180 accusation or people

01:08:41.780 just think she's too

01:08:42.860 hawkish?

01:08:45.580 Is it sort of a

01:08:46.580 generally too hawkish

01:08:47.600 situation?

01:08:50.020 I'm not exactly sure

01:08:51.400 what she's being

01:08:51.960 blamed of.

01:08:52.520 But apparently she is

01:08:57.400 a Russia expert.

01:09:00.600 She's a Russia expert.

01:09:03.220 Do you know what I

01:09:04.140 said was the cause of

01:09:05.140 the war?

01:09:05.940 Does anybody remember

01:09:06.660 what I said was the

01:09:07.440 cause of the war?

01:09:08.980 Or the cause of our

01:09:10.100 bad relations with

01:09:11.180 Russia in general?

01:09:12.480 In my opinion, it's

01:09:14.780 because we create too

01:09:15.980 many Russia experts.

01:09:17.180 And the Russia experts

01:09:19.500 have to do some

01:09:20.220 Russia stuff and

01:09:21.720 cause some Russia

01:09:22.580 stuff to happen.

01:09:24.020 So I think we're

01:09:25.340 creating the people

01:09:26.760 who create the

01:09:27.380 problem.

01:09:28.820 Because they need to

01:09:30.680 have a narrative,

01:09:31.840 they need to justify

01:09:33.080 their life's work.

01:09:34.480 Imagine if we created

01:09:35.540 these tens of

01:09:36.400 thousands of Russia

01:09:37.280 experts like

01:09:38.140 Victoria Nuland.

01:09:40.440 And then we made

01:09:41.340 peace with Russia.

01:09:42.660 And they became an

01:09:43.360 ally.

01:09:44.700 They all lose their

01:09:45.880 jobs.

01:09:47.180 Or they have to

01:09:47.920 at least retool.

01:09:49.460 You know, and maybe

01:09:50.140 find a way to use

01:09:50.960 those skills.

01:09:51.940 But I think we're

01:09:54.360 creating a system

01:09:56.100 which guarantees war

01:09:57.900 with Russia.

01:09:58.580 And the system is we

01:10:00.080 keep making Russia

01:10:01.020 experts.

01:10:02.440 Now, I'm not sure,

01:10:03.240 I'm not saying we

01:10:03.800 shouldn't have Russia

01:10:04.520 experts, but at some

01:10:06.100 point, if you've

01:10:07.580 produced an abundance

01:10:08.540 of Russia experts, you

01:10:09.880 could guarantee a war

01:10:10.980 with Russia.

01:10:12.480 Let me put it in a

01:10:14.120 different way.

01:10:15.380 If we had an

01:10:16.360 unusual number

01:10:17.660 of, I don't

01:10:19.960 know, North

01:10:21.240 Korea experts,

01:10:24.200 do you think that

01:10:25.120 more people go

01:10:26.000 into the foreign

01:10:26.980 services and

01:10:28.960 become Russia

01:10:29.680 experts?

01:10:30.640 Or do more of

01:10:31.560 them try to become

01:10:32.680 North Korea

01:10:33.600 experts?

01:10:35.300 Do you know why

01:10:36.120 we're not at war

01:10:36.820 with North Korea?

01:10:39.260 Probably because we

01:10:41.360 have not created

01:10:42.320 enough North Korea

01:10:43.280 experts to have

01:10:44.480 something that they

01:10:45.140 need to do with

01:10:45.740 their life.

01:10:47.020 Probably.

01:10:48.100 Because if you're a

01:10:49.220 Russia expert, at

01:10:50.140 least you get to

01:10:50.680 visit Russia, which

01:10:52.020 could be cool.

01:10:53.740 If you're a North

01:10:54.560 Korean expert, you're

01:10:56.180 not even going to get

01:10:57.340 to visit the place

01:10:58.240 you're an expert at.

01:11:00.740 So, you know, why

01:11:01.680 would you even go into

01:11:02.420 that line of work?

01:11:04.020 Honestly, I think

01:11:04.900 Victoria and Newland

01:11:05.940 might be part of my

01:11:07.500 larger framework,

01:11:08.940 larger framework that

01:11:11.860 we create too many

01:11:12.920 people who have to

01:11:13.840 make it their job to

01:11:14.920 create a war with

01:11:15.880 Russia.

01:11:16.820 So she just might be

01:11:17.880 one of those.

01:11:20.200 She has family from

01:11:21.360 Russia?

01:11:23.300 Yeah.

01:11:23.800 I don't know which

01:11:24.560 way that would affect

01:11:25.380 her.

01:11:25.640 Maybe that would make

01:11:26.240 her less liking

01:11:28.300 Putin.

01:11:29.780 Depends how the

01:11:30.480 family was doing, I

01:11:32.240 guess.

01:11:32.960 All right.

01:11:33.280 Ladies and gentlemen,

01:11:33.900 this completes my

01:11:36.900 prepared remarks.

01:11:38.340 Is there a topic I

01:11:39.160 missed today that is

01:11:41.040 vitally important to

01:11:42.180 you?

01:11:44.040 Yeah.

01:11:44.740 So Starseed is asking

01:11:46.460 the right questions.

01:11:47.640 So questions I would

01:11:48.500 ask, because Victoria

01:11:50.440 Newland seems important

01:11:52.700 to the understanding of

01:11:54.440 the larger story.

01:11:55.680 Wouldn't you want to

01:11:56.400 know what her

01:11:57.440 connections are?

01:11:59.000 I tried Googling her,

01:12:01.260 and it's just page

01:12:02.200 after page of official

01:12:03.420 government stuff that

01:12:05.420 doesn't look like it's

01:12:06.300 telling me anything.

01:12:07.160 Because the real

01:12:07.820 questions are, who's

01:12:08.840 she married to?

01:12:10.440 Right?

01:12:11.400 Who's she married to?

01:12:12.280 If she's married, I

01:12:13.060 don't know if she is.

01:12:13.880 Who's she married to?

01:12:15.940 What associations is

01:12:17.440 she a member of?

01:12:19.400 And what do those

01:12:20.060 associations do

01:12:21.060 typically?

01:12:24.380 And, you know, what

01:12:25.460 has she done in the

01:12:26.140 past that might be

01:12:27.680 relevant or

01:12:28.840 controversial?

01:12:29.940 So there's a whole

01:12:30.760 bunch I'd like to

01:12:31.540 know about her, just

01:12:33.080 to understand the

01:12:33.820 situation, but I

01:12:35.000 don't have an

01:12:35.920 accusation.

01:12:37.500 So I'm not accusing

01:12:38.660 her of anything.

01:12:39.440 I'm just saying,

01:12:40.680 maybe we've got too

01:12:41.640 many Russia experts.

01:12:43.900 All right.

01:12:46.520 Ladies and gentlemen,

01:12:47.480 I'm going to say

01:12:48.860 goodbye to you over

01:12:49.960 on...

01:12:53.080 All right, so I'm

01:12:55.220 getting the anti-Semitic

01:12:56.560 thing over on YouTube.

01:12:58.360 I've got to pause for a

01:12:59.360 second, okay?

01:13:01.640 For all of you

01:13:02.640 anti-Semitic people,

01:13:06.320 while I don't condemn

01:13:09.260 thought crimes, I don't

01:13:12.100 want to see it.

01:13:14.500 Like, you don't have to

01:13:15.680 put it here.

01:13:16.840 But let me give you this

01:13:18.220 little framework.

01:13:19.440 If you're anti-Semitic

01:13:20.940 and you think the Jews are

01:13:22.340 coordinating to take over

01:13:23.620 the world, I would like to

01:13:25.740 give you a reframe on that.

01:13:26.920 So I'm going to reframe

01:13:28.520 some of you anti-Semites

01:13:30.080 out of your anti-Semitism.

01:13:32.640 And it's going to happen

01:13:33.380 right now, right in front

01:13:34.900 of you.

01:13:35.240 It won't work for all of

01:13:36.260 you, but I'll pick up a

01:13:37.940 few of you.

01:13:38.640 So a few of you I'm going

01:13:39.720 to cure right now.

01:13:42.080 How would things look

01:13:43.040 different if the only

01:13:45.160 thing about the Jewish

01:13:46.560 community is they put a

01:13:48.260 big emphasis on education

01:13:50.000 and, you know, career

01:13:52.140 success?

01:13:53.200 How would that look

01:13:54.320 different from every

01:13:55.440 observation?

01:13:56.020 Would they, for example,

01:13:57.920 go into industries that

01:13:59.200 pay a lot and are great

01:14:01.120 jobs, such as the

01:14:02.000 entertainment industry?

01:14:03.920 Yes.

01:14:04.920 Would they have more

01:14:07.120 control over the industry

01:14:09.180 than maybe another group

01:14:10.540 that had less attention

01:14:13.460 to education and career

01:14:15.480 success?

01:14:16.520 Of course.

01:14:18.060 So all you need to know

01:14:19.880 is that the Jewish

01:14:20.640 community has been super

01:14:22.280 successful as school.

01:14:24.660 That's it.

01:14:26.020 Every other observation

01:14:27.120 would look like that.

01:14:29.020 So everything you think

01:14:29.980 about, oh, there must be

01:14:31.120 some coordination and

01:14:33.260 some Jewish thing.

01:14:35.040 No.

01:14:36.000 How about it's a group of

01:14:37.100 people who put an emphasis

01:14:39.360 on the stuff that puts you

01:14:41.300 in those jobs?

01:14:42.760 And then they've got good

01:14:43.700 jobs, and then you say,

01:14:45.220 hey, wait a minute.

01:14:46.720 There are too many Jewish

01:14:47.900 people in high levels of

01:14:49.500 government.

01:14:49.860 government.

01:14:51.180 How would there not be?

01:14:53.620 How could that not happen?

01:14:55.460 There are also lots of people

01:14:56.800 from Harvard and Yale

01:14:58.620 in government jobs.

01:15:00.880 Is it a Harvard conspiracy?

01:15:03.380 Because there's so many

01:15:04.280 Harvard people in government?

01:15:05.460 No.

01:15:06.140 It's just an indication that

01:15:07.460 there's a certain people who

01:15:08.620 are trying to get those jobs,

01:15:10.700 and they're doing the right

01:15:11.480 stuff.

01:15:11.740 So the only thing I would

01:15:16.080 ask you is if you've been

01:15:18.680 spending too much time

01:15:19.700 online, you're going to get

01:15:21.420 all the pattern people.

01:15:23.980 Oh, look at this pattern.

01:15:26.160 Oh, that's funny.

01:15:27.880 Every time there's something

01:15:29.500 bad happening, why do I see

01:15:31.380 so many Jewish names in the

01:15:32.820 leadership?

01:15:33.140 Because they have a

01:15:35.920 concentration of people who

01:15:37.640 like to go to school, get

01:15:39.760 good grades, and get good

01:15:41.700 jobs.

01:15:44.960 If you can't eliminate the

01:15:46.700 obvious fact that people who

01:15:49.300 try to succeed and do all the

01:15:50.940 right things do in fact

01:15:53.060 succeed, there's your whole

01:15:56.120 explanation.

01:15:58.960 I have worked, and I'll give

01:16:01.080 you my personal experience.

01:16:04.900 So I've worked in mostly

01:16:06.380 publication, publishing, the

01:16:09.560 book world, syndication.

01:16:12.280 Can you imagine how many

01:16:14.680 Jewish professionals I deal

01:16:17.620 with as my normal work?

01:16:20.060 All right.

01:16:20.640 It's saturated.

01:16:22.820 Most of my success, most of it,

01:16:27.340 is because I worked with really

01:16:28.900 good Jewish executives and

01:16:31.040 professionals who were trying

01:16:32.940 to make me successful, because

01:16:35.120 that's how they do their jobs

01:16:36.800 and how they're successful.

01:16:38.360 But I've spent a lot of time,

01:16:41.100 you know, saturated in that

01:16:44.060 community.

01:16:45.540 I've never seen anything that

01:16:46.820 looked like a conspiracy, and I'm

01:16:49.680 pretty sure I would have.

01:16:51.680 Like, I've never seen anybody

01:16:52.920 discriminating against me,

01:16:54.960 because I was, you know, not

01:16:56.240 Jewish.

01:16:57.080 I've never seen anybody

01:16:58.560 coordinate at all.

01:17:01.960 I've never even heard of it.

01:17:03.140 I've never even heard of

01:17:04.040 anybody like, oh, the Jewish

01:17:06.400 executives got together and did

01:17:07.860 some Jewish stuff.

01:17:09.160 Never once.

01:17:10.940 Do Jewish executives like

01:17:13.260 Israel?

01:17:14.700 Yeah.

01:17:16.160 Yeah.

01:17:16.980 What, is that a newsflash or

01:17:18.360 something?

01:17:19.340 Would they say things in public

01:17:21.580 that would be supportive of

01:17:22.780 Israel, and it would sound like

01:17:24.340 they were on the same team?

01:17:25.860 Yeah.

01:17:27.180 Yes, of course.

01:17:29.500 You're just looking for

01:17:30.860 conspiracies where it's hard to

01:17:34.460 find.

01:17:34.660 Now, let me, so that I don't

01:17:37.660 look like I'm, you know, just

01:17:39.180 completely crazy to you, does

01:17:42.060 it look like the Jewish, let's

01:17:44.760 say, lobbying in the United

01:17:46.220 States is effective?

01:17:49.080 Yes.

01:17:50.380 Yes.

01:17:51.080 Why would it be effective?

01:17:52.380 Same fucking reason.

01:17:55.980 You've got a whole community of

01:17:57.480 people who are focused on

01:17:59.400 education, have really good

01:18:01.820 communication skills, because

01:18:03.280 that's what education gives you.

01:18:05.360 Also very, you know, career

01:18:08.260 oriented, so they have good

01:18:09.440 jobs.

01:18:10.440 So when they talk, you listen to

01:18:12.020 them, because they're in the

01:18:13.140 kinds of jobs where people

01:18:14.320 listen to them.

01:18:15.980 And they like Israel.

01:18:18.140 And so there's a whole bunch of

01:18:19.200 people who do things that, you

01:18:21.080 know, are not bad for the United

01:18:22.320 States necessarily, but, you

01:18:23.740 know, they have a Israel benefit

01:18:26.240 to them.

01:18:27.280 It's all transparent.

01:18:29.440 I mean, it's as transparent as

01:18:30.700 you could possibly see.

01:18:32.300 Israel is one of our closest

01:18:33.800 allies, and we'd probably like to

01:18:36.400 keep it that way.

01:18:37.000 So, yeah, so watch the comments, and

01:18:44.700 you'll see the people who can't

01:18:46.040 handle the reframe.

01:18:47.860 They're just going to go with the

01:18:49.080 insults to me.

01:18:51.100 Would anybody like to live out their

01:18:53.980 troll-like anti-Semitic wet dreams by

01:18:58.260 saying something shitty about me?

01:19:00.420 This would be the time to do it.

01:19:07.540 And you're debunking what now?

01:19:09.860 I'm just telling you that you're

01:19:11.260 seeing conspiracies where you should

01:19:13.860 see a group of people who are just

01:19:16.260 doing the right things for success and

01:19:18.280 succeeding.

01:19:20.100 And, of course, they might like Israel

01:19:22.360 above average.

01:19:25.420 Big surprise.

01:19:26.340 All right, so enough on that.

01:19:30.600 YouTube, thanks for listening.

01:19:31.920 I'll see you.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - August 14, 2023

Episode 2200 Scott Adams： If You Want Your Mind Blown, Today Is The Day For That. Bring Cleanup Rags

Episode Stats

Length

Words per Minute

Word Count

Sentence Count

Misogynist Sentences

Hate Speech Sentences

Summary

Transcript