Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2202 Scott Adams： Wild Day In News & Opinion And I'm Here To Show You The Machinery. Coffee!

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of civilization, sometimes with proper lighting.

00:00:12.220 There we go. Just right.

00:00:15.460 If you'd like to take this experience, which is going to be amazing just by itself,

00:00:19.880 but if you want to take this to levels that nobody's ever understood or heard or could even speak of,

00:00:24.600 there's no words to explain it.

00:00:25.880 All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or chalice, a steiner, a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:32.220 Fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.

00:00:35.500 And join me now for the unclearable pleasure of the dopamine at the end of the day that makes everything better.

00:00:40.220 It's called the Simultaneous Sip.

00:00:42.480 It happens now.

00:00:44.560 Go.

00:00:48.560 Ah, you did that well.

00:00:50.660 I think that was your best sip.

00:00:53.180 Good job.

00:00:53.840 Well, I don't know where to begin.

00:00:57.100 There's so many weird and interesting stories today that I didn't even get to check the news.

00:01:04.360 And I'll talk about that.

00:01:06.420 The news without the news.

00:01:09.460 All right, well, I like to start with interesting stories before we get to the big meat.

00:01:13.960 But so there's a tour group that gives tours of San Francisco.

00:01:18.960 How would you like to be a tour group or how would you like to be a business whose job it was to give tours of San Francisco?

00:01:27.800 Well, apparently they're capitalizing on the situation and they're now giving a tour that they call the Doom Loop Walking Tour.

00:01:35.020 And it's a tongue-in-cheek ad, but it says, you've read the headlines.

00:01:40.760 You've seen the tweets.

00:01:42.300 Now get close and personal to the doom and squalor of downtown San Francisco.

00:01:49.280 Discover the policy choices that made America's wealthiest city, the nation's innovative leader of housing crisis addiction.

00:01:58.020 So apparently, here's the funny part, the tours are booked.

00:02:04.700 They're fully booked.

00:02:06.920 There's all these people who want to see the Doom Loop of a city in complete disarray and decline.

00:02:14.520 Now, if there's one thing I love about America, there's more than one thing.

00:02:19.860 But one thing I love about America is that we've never heard of a problem we can't make money on.

00:02:25.240 You name it, if something's going wrong, there's one of us bastards who's figuring out how to make a buck on it.

00:02:35.200 And I'm sure that that's what keeps the entire system working, is that the dumbest, most unproductive things in the world can be going on,

00:02:43.380 and somebody's going to be sitting just off the sidelines saying, I think I can make this work.

00:02:49.920 I think I can build a business model around this.

00:02:53.020 Free market for the win.

00:02:55.240 Speaking of the free market, Elon Musk tweeted, he actually put newspapers in a quote.

00:03:02.920 He goes, newspapers, just search the internet, particularly this platform, and print it out.

00:03:12.260 Wow.

00:03:12.780 Now, you know, there used to be a good reason to read newspapers.

00:03:19.620 Does anybody remember when newspapers had a comic called, what was it called?

00:03:24.880 It was called Dilbert.

00:03:26.160 Dilbert used to be in these paper things called newspapers, and they would be sent to people, like physically, to their homes and stuff.

00:03:33.620 And then they would try to read them, and they would get, like their hands would be filled with kind of weird ink and crap.

00:03:40.580 And after you read it, you couldn't talk, you couldn't touch your food.

00:03:44.960 Did you ever try to read a newspaper and eat toast at the same time?

00:03:49.680 No, you can't do it.

00:03:51.000 Because your toast is going to taste like newspaper ink.

00:03:54.980 Right?

00:03:55.760 Yeah.

00:03:56.820 Now, I might have a bad attitude about newspapers at the moment.

00:04:00.540 I might have a little bias, a little bit.

00:04:06.700 The funniest question I get from trolls online is that the trolls like to come into my tweets and say something about how sad I must be that I got canceled by newspapers.

00:04:21.560 Who would want to be associated with newspapers?

00:04:26.280 Can you raise your hand?

00:04:27.700 Is there anybody here who, have you ever gone on a date and lied that you worked for the newspaper business?

00:04:34.000 Try to impress your date?

00:04:35.760 It's like, I don't want her to hear that I'm a quality assurance person at a big corporation.

00:04:41.260 I'm going to make up some kind of sexy job.

00:04:44.940 Astronaut?

00:04:45.880 No.

00:04:46.540 No, she'd catch me.

00:04:48.200 Ah.

00:04:49.580 Newspaper reporter.

00:04:51.680 Newspaper writer.

00:04:53.240 Yeah.

00:04:54.520 Because you'd like to feel good about yourself.

00:04:57.700 Because you work for a newspaper.

00:05:00.080 Mmm.

00:05:02.480 Well, I was also watching some YouTube clips from Peter Zayen.

00:05:08.380 My God, that guy's interesting.

00:05:10.780 Now, I do not know if Peter Zayen has, you know, amazingly good insights about everything geopolitical.

00:05:18.700 Or not.

00:05:20.500 I mean, I really can't tell what's true and what's not.

00:05:22.680 But I'll tell you, his content is interesting from beginning to end.

00:05:27.000 So, you know, use your adult filters to, you know, put yourself in the head of nobody knows the future.

00:05:36.300 Can we agree that nobody knows the future?

00:05:39.060 But he says interesting things.

00:05:40.560 So, I'm going to share a few with you.

00:05:43.020 And first of all, I need a fact check on this.

00:05:45.160 Because as Elon Musk says, the newspapers, but also the regular news, they don't have regular news gathering assets.

00:05:56.620 So, they're trying to sell opinion as news.

00:06:00.580 So, when actual news drops, sometimes you can't find it anywhere.

00:06:05.300 Because it's not opinion.

00:06:06.740 It's actual news.

00:06:08.300 But can you give me a confirmation?

00:06:11.120 So, I haven't seen this in any news, so-called news, that we're working on a deal with Iran.

00:06:18.780 And that it's looking good.

00:06:21.620 Have you heard that?

00:06:22.940 I can't even tell if it was a new video.

00:06:26.220 But why have I completely missed that in reading the news every single day, several times a day?

00:06:31.780 And I never saw it?

00:06:33.780 Well, I don't know why.

00:06:36.240 I guess it's because, as Elon Musk says, the newspapers are not real news.

00:06:41.500 And the regular news isn't real news.

00:06:43.420 And by the way, that was another thing that Peter Zayon described.

00:06:47.580 He described the evolution from having robust news bureaus in other countries to what we have now,

00:06:54.860 which is people writing opinions and then other people writing opinions about the other people's opinions.

00:07:00.360 And we're selling it as news because it comes out on the legacy platforms that you used to think were news.

00:07:08.080 So, it makes you think that news is happening.

00:07:10.780 But there hasn't been news in a long time.

00:07:14.080 And news went away a long time ago.

00:07:16.480 It's just opinions about opinions.

00:07:18.520 So, anyway, but if Peter Zayon is correct, it would look like the broad strokes of the deal would have something about the U.S. having, or the international community,

00:07:33.600 the U.N. having more access to checking out Iran's nuclear situation.

00:07:39.660 And apparently they're going to agree to that.

00:07:41.220 And one of the surprises is, now this is from Peter Zayon, one of the surprises is, when Iran recently was re-inspected,

00:07:50.500 is that that uranium that they were processing up to nuclear grade, they actually started going in the other direction.

00:07:58.940 They took half of what they had up to, like, 90%, and half of it they've already downgraded it to, is it enrichment is the right word?

00:08:07.660 So, they've unenriched it, if that's a thing.

00:08:12.240 So, it's less likely to become a weapon.

00:08:15.500 So, it's beginning to look like Iran either didn't need that much, or maybe they weren't so dead set on building a nuclear weapon.

00:08:25.020 But, I guess part of the deal is they would allow more inspections.

00:08:29.120 They would give $6 billion of their own money back, or somebody else's money.

00:08:35.980 It wasn't our money.

00:08:37.360 But, the background on this is that the Russian sanctions, in an indirect way that he can explain, but I can't at the moment,

00:08:49.720 in an indirect way, are hurt Iran.

00:08:51.760 So, Iran apparently is just dying for cash.

00:08:55.580 They're just broke.

00:08:56.480 And so, Biden may have accidentally done more harm to Iran's economy than Trump did, but not because he was trying,

00:09:06.560 but because he, you know, the Ukraine war had a side impact on Iran, which is pretty devastating.

00:09:13.200 So, that made an opportunity for a deal, because Iran was more desperate than they have been.

00:09:19.940 Now, this is Peter Zayn's take.

00:09:21.480 I don't know, you know, I'm not there, so I don't have any counterclaims to bounce against it.

00:09:29.860 But, the idea is that Iran might be flexible about nuclear stuff.

00:09:35.260 And, here's, and if Zayn is right, Benjamin Netanyahu, head of Israel, says that they're looking at a deal that he can live with.

00:09:47.140 So, there might actually be something going on that's entirely positive for everybody, meaning that the Middle East would get back into some kind of balance.

00:09:57.880 I believe part of the deal is that Iran would stop funding attacks against Saudi Arabia and some of their neighbors.

00:10:05.240 So, you would get fewer funding, less funding of proxy attacks.

00:10:10.160 We'd get, we'd get some prisoners back, I guess some drug dealers were in prison. 0.55

00:10:15.800 They would get six billion dollars of their own or somebody else's money that had been held up, but it wasn't our money.

00:10:23.700 And, then we would get access to their, you know, nuclear inspections.

00:10:28.420 Now, the fact that maybe Netanyahu could live with it.

00:10:32.280 Now, put two things together.

00:10:34.840 Two things.

00:10:35.420 Start with the Abraham Accords. 0.78

00:10:39.840 So, the Abraham Accords got a lot of the players on the same team, at least economically and on paper.

00:10:46.720 But, Iran was specifically carved out as somebody you couldn't deal with at the moment.

00:10:54.320 But, that caused a problem because Iran is a funder of proxy wars and, you know, they're the big problem over there.

00:10:59.880 So, it looks like we're heading toward, don't get too excited, but, you know, the chatter is that Saudi Arabia might be willing to recognize Israel, which I think might be a separate conversation, but I can easily see them folded together.

00:11:16.140 So, Saudi Arabia might get relief from the proxy wars, is it the Hutus and the whoever's, so that we're attacking Saudi and Saudi interests, Yemen. 0.79

00:11:29.400 So, the Yemen thing might get some relief, at least in the funding sense.

00:11:33.500 Relief meaning they're not funded to attack anybody anymore.

00:11:39.160 And, that would create the hope would be some balance in the Middle East sufficient that we don't need to be involved with the United States.

00:11:49.780 And, that might be amazing.

00:11:55.140 We might be right on the cusp of two administrations doing the right thing, in one case maybe a little bit accidentally, but, you know, taking advantage of it.

00:12:06.240 We might be seeing something like a gigantic two administration, because I think you'd have to include both, two administration achievement that would be kind of amazing.

00:12:19.780 Kind of amazing.

00:12:20.980 The Hutus are Rwandans.

00:12:22.700 Okay, I don't know my, assume everything I said about that area is wrong.

00:12:28.760 So, it's Yemen.

00:12:30.600 What are the two groups in Yemen?

00:12:33.560 The two warring groups in Yemen are the, the, the, the Who's and the Who's.

00:12:41.020 I'm in the wrong continent, yeah.

00:12:42.820 I only got the wrong continent, but.

00:12:46.500 The Houthis, all right, well, somebody's fighting over there.

00:12:49.780 Anyway, so that might be good.

00:12:51.240 We'll see.

00:12:51.740 But the other thing that Peter Zahn said is that, I hadn't heard this before, that the primary reason for Russia's, let's say, aggressiveness against his neighbors, and I'd never heard this before.

00:13:04.460 Now, you'd always heard that it was, you know, maybe defensive, and maybe, maybe it was building up his empire to get it back to where it was.

00:13:12.240 But, you know, everything that you hear in the United States through the regular news about Russia and Russia's intentions and Putin's intentions, that's all fake propaganda bullshit, right?

00:13:32.000 So, you, but Peter Zahn has a take, and it goes like this, and I don't know if I believe it.

00:13:40.020 So, I feel like there's probably a lot more to it.

00:13:44.300 Yeah, you've heard it's about warm water ports.

00:13:46.180 Here's his take, that the topography of Russia and the surrounding countries that are, you know, between it and Europe proper, the topography is really disadvantageous for defense.

00:14:02.020 Meaning that if somebody were to attack Russia, prior to Russia being aggressive and, you know, taking Crimea and Georgia and all those things, there were some easy attack points that the homeland of Russia would be vulnerable to.

00:14:17.900 But, in the old days, under the Soviet Union, they had controlled enough territory that they could control choke points. 0.50

00:14:24.680 So, there are some choke points that if you controlled them militarily, it would be very difficult for an army to attack Russia.

00:14:33.420 If you don't attack them, apparently it's kind of easy on the ground.

00:14:37.700 Now, so the thinking is that even if Putin left tomorrow, the other senior people who were, you know, his people would have exactly the same policy,

00:14:48.900 because they all see it as an existential risk to Russia, whether soon or in the next thousand years.

00:14:56.780 In other words, they're looking for a permanent security situation for Russia.

00:15:03.140 Now, have you ever seen that reported in regular news?

00:15:06.820 I read a lot of news about Ukraine.

00:15:09.820 I've never seen that before, have you?

00:15:12.240 How many of you have never heard that before, other from Peter Zand?

00:15:16.940 So, some of you have.

00:15:18.060 You know, a lot of you have.

00:15:20.880 Interesting.

00:15:22.380 All right, well, good for you.

00:15:23.600 You know, I've said this a lot.

00:15:24.940 This is the, I think, the most informed and smartest audience in politics,

00:15:29.800 because you actually are engaged in trying to figure out how to figure out,

00:15:35.460 which is way more important than figuring out what the news said.

00:15:39.140 You know, this is a group of people who are very actively trying to figure out,

00:15:42.840 how are they lying to us?

00:15:44.380 And if they are lying, how can we figure it out?

00:15:46.940 And what are the tells for lying and stuff?

00:15:49.760 So, well, so I'm impressed.

00:15:51.660 I'm impressed.

00:15:52.620 That's such a basic thing that you should need to know about the Ukraine war.

00:15:57.640 Now, here's the part that I'm going to disagree with Peter Zand.

00:16:00.360 He says that the war can't end unless one of them just has a convincing victory,

00:16:07.220 and that, you know, that's unlikely.

00:16:09.260 So that if Ukraine doesn't outright win and pretty much demolish Russia as a major power, 0.76

00:16:17.140 or Putin somehow magically win, if that doesn't happen, the war will just go on forever.

00:16:26.300 But what I hear is the opposite.

00:16:29.340 What I hear, if it's true, that their primary interest is the choke points,

00:16:34.460 how could you not have a way to negotiate that?

00:16:38.920 That feels like the easiest thing to negotiate.

00:16:40.960 Now, that doesn't mean you necessarily say, oh, these choke points can belong to you.

00:16:46.300 But it definitely tells you that if you've got something called NATO,

00:16:50.140 don't expect them to give up on the choke points.

00:16:53.940 I mean, you'd have to look at the whole situation, right?

00:16:57.280 Like, how about the whole trade economic situation?

00:17:01.140 How about the entire Russia-China connection?

00:17:05.360 You'd want to loosen that and maybe get Russia into the European or American domain a little bit more.

00:17:13.060 So, to me, the fact that we understand what the Russians want,

00:17:17.480 or at least I do, maybe for the first time I understand that element,

00:17:21.320 that usually gives you something to negotiate.

00:17:24.620 The times when you can't negotiate is when two sides want the same thing,

00:17:29.840 and there's only one of the same thing.

00:17:31.760 This is a situation where Russia wants something unique to Russia,

00:17:36.140 and other people want their own things, like their own security, etc.

00:17:41.460 But they're different things.

00:17:43.840 And I would say, as a general negotiation fact,

00:17:48.380 that when people want the same one thing, you've got a problem.

00:17:52.220 Okay, you know that statue?

00:17:53.980 I own that.

00:17:55.160 No, I own it.

00:17:56.660 Where are you going to go with that?

00:17:58.300 You can't have half a statue.

00:17:59.580 But if you've got a situation where what the Russians need 0.85

00:18:02.520 is a specific geographic or defensive power,

00:18:07.340 there's probably a number of ways to get to that.

00:18:10.140 And it's unique to them.

00:18:11.880 So, in other words, you don't have to give up something of your own too much, necessarily,

00:18:16.880 to give them what they want.

00:18:18.080 And that usually suggests a deal could be made.

00:18:21.380 So I still think it could.

00:18:23.560 All right.

00:18:25.440 RFK Jr. said,

00:18:26.500 two of the most surprising things you'll ever hear from a Democrat.

00:18:30.060 Number one, Trump was right.

00:18:32.220 He was wrong.

00:18:33.300 The wall is needed.

00:18:35.180 Boom.

00:18:35.740 Now, when he says carefully,

00:18:37.060 I don't mean physically a wall the whole way,

00:18:39.460 but also Trump didn't really mean that either.

00:18:41.660 He means whatever it takes to close the border.

00:18:45.040 He calls the border completely open,

00:18:47.300 and he tells a story that's associated with his documentary he did.

00:18:52.020 He spent a lot of time interviewing people there.

00:18:54.620 And I heard a story from him.

00:18:56.160 This was on Tucker's interview.

00:18:58.280 I heard a story from RFK Jr. that I'd never heard.

00:19:02.600 Apparently, we always knew the cartels are managing the illegal flow of immigration.

00:19:08.240 We didn't know.

00:19:09.300 Well, I didn't know.

00:19:10.300 So, again, this might be something you already knew.

00:19:12.180 I didn't know that their operation, the cartel operation,

00:19:15.820 had spread globally to the point where almost all of the immigrants

00:19:21.760 are not from Central America or Mexico.

00:19:25.780 Almost all of them are from Africa, everywhere else, China. 0.53

00:19:30.800 And he pointed out that the vast majority of them are military-age men,

00:19:37.980 but he's not saying it's a military operation.

00:19:43.080 He's just saying that if you were to look at them,

00:19:45.040 that would be the description.

00:19:46.320 They're young men.

00:19:47.480 But they're coming from Africa. 0.72

00:19:50.040 They're coming from China. 0.97

00:19:51.280 They're coming from any place they can get out of. 0.95

00:19:54.740 Now, and apparently, this system is built to look like we have a system,

00:20:00.280 but it's a fake system.

00:20:01.940 It's really designed to let everybody in.

00:20:04.400 And here's what that means.

00:20:05.780 If you come in, let's say, the legal way where the government is checking your fingerprints

00:20:11.760 and giving you a court date, your court date is in seven years.

00:20:17.300 You have seven years to live in this country completely legally.

00:20:22.320 Now, you're not a citizen, but you're completely legal because you've checked in.

00:20:28.660 Do you think that in seven years they're going to be sent back?

00:20:31.800 Do you think there's a court in America at seven years from now

00:20:34.600 who's going to say, well, you've been living and working here for seven years

00:20:37.920 and you've committed no crimes, let's say?

00:20:41.300 Do you think that we're going to send them back?

00:20:43.520 Of course not.

00:20:44.560 No, we do have an open border.

00:20:47.180 And even RFK Jr., a Democrat, says it clearly.

00:20:51.380 This is an open border.

00:20:52.300 And he's basically saying that the news has been kept from you.

00:20:57.940 Not only has the news been kept from us, but even from the right.

00:21:01.760 I would say that I have not seen any right-leaning publication,

00:21:06.060 and that might be on me.

00:21:07.480 I mean, it probably is in Breitbart, actually.

00:21:09.600 Breitbart's good on the border.

00:21:11.520 So Breitbart probably has covered this.

00:21:14.300 But I haven't seen it on Fox News that 98% of the people coming in

00:21:18.540 are not from Central and South America.

00:21:22.080 And Kamala Harris has that all worked out, right?

00:21:25.100 So Kamala Harris is working on Central America,

00:21:27.600 and that's not even the problem?

00:21:31.160 It doesn't look like incompetence, does it?

00:21:34.600 Would you agree?

00:21:35.860 That whatever is going on, it doesn't look like incompetence.

00:21:38.860 It looks like some kind of a very determined effort

00:21:44.040 to just let everybody in.

00:21:47.660 And it's hard for me to imagine

00:21:49.540 what the positive outcome of that is.

00:21:51.740 Because the cities are gone.

00:21:53.900 The cities are destroyed.

00:21:55.860 Are you telling me the Democrats were trying

00:21:57.580 to destroy the Democrat cities by letting in?

00:22:00.860 Or is it only because the Republican governors

00:22:03.280 cleverly shipped their people to the blue cities 1.00

00:22:07.420 and thwarted their plan?

00:22:08.780 I don't know what's going on.

00:22:10.020 To me, it doesn't look like a clever plan.

00:22:14.880 I don't see the clever way that the Democrats

00:22:18.080 are using immigration as a secret tool 1.00

00:22:21.700 to accomplish their what?

00:22:24.360 Do they really think they're going to get extra votes?

00:22:27.840 I don't think so.

00:22:29.920 I think that these immigrants are being shipped into cities 1.00

00:22:33.060 where they're being shipped into the filth and crime

00:22:36.760 that they were trying to escape.

00:22:38.020 And they're probably saying to themselves

00:22:40.400 the same thing everybody else is.

00:22:41.980 What can we do about this?

00:22:43.960 Because I would like less crime and filth

00:22:45.800 in my own city where I'm living for seven years at least.

00:22:49.480 And they're probably going to say,

00:22:50.960 is there anybody who's offering to take care of it?

00:22:54.220 You know, like a Republican, for example.

00:22:57.320 I don't know.

00:22:57.920 I would definitely vote.

00:22:58.980 I would bet against immigration 1.00

00:23:01.900 turning the country more liberal.

00:23:05.540 Do you think, let me do a mental,

00:23:11.740 just a mental test for you.

00:23:14.200 Imagine a busload, the cartel's got a busload of immigrants, 1.00

00:23:17.960 and they've been taken from everywhere from China

00:23:20.620 to Africa to, I guess, you know,

00:23:25.080 Eastern Europe or something.

00:23:26.140 So they're all over the place.

00:23:29.380 If you were to do a survey of the,

00:23:32.260 let's say, attitudes or philosophies

00:23:34.760 of the people on that bus,

00:23:37.140 how many are conservative and how many are liberal

00:23:40.300 on the generic immigrant bus?

00:23:48.120 Remember, people, they're not French. 0.84

00:23:51.440 They're not French. 0.82

00:23:53.120 They're not British. 1.00

00:23:54.600 They're not Australian. 1.00

00:23:57.080 They're not woke.

00:23:59.620 My guess is they're bringing busloads

00:24:03.580 of unwoke people into the country.

00:24:06.240 Now, that doesn't mean that they, you know,

00:24:08.220 register as Republican.

00:24:09.960 But I think from a social perspective,

00:24:12.400 they're bringing in way more conservative people

00:24:14.700 than their own base.

00:24:16.340 Am I wrong?

00:24:18.080 Given that it's, you know,

00:24:19.600 the specific collection of people

00:24:21.460 from all over the world,

00:24:22.580 do you think the Africans are liberal? 1.00

00:24:29.400 You think Africans are liberal? 1.00

00:24:31.540 I mean, in some senses, of course.

00:24:33.640 You know, certainly racially, they would be.

00:24:37.060 I mean, at least they wouldn't want

00:24:39.900 any discrimination against themselves.

00:24:42.940 Well, I don't know.

00:24:44.180 So I don't understand why the border is open

00:24:46.440 because I don't see the play.

00:24:47.640 It doesn't look like simple incompetence.

00:24:51.160 It looks like a plan.

00:24:53.820 But the only way it makes sense to me is,

00:24:56.640 what's the only way it makes it?

00:24:58.440 There you go.

00:24:59.700 The only way it makes sense is if China 0.97

00:25:02.360 or one of our adversaries

00:25:04.160 has bribed the president

00:25:06.200 to go easy on the border.

00:25:09.080 I mean, to me,

00:25:09.740 it looks like there's some outside force

00:25:11.920 because there's nothing in the news

00:25:14.720 that would explain what we're seeing.

00:25:17.240 It would have to be an external force 0.99

00:25:19.360 or it could be an internal force,

00:25:21.420 but one that's not reported

00:25:22.900 or we don't see.

00:25:23.860 It's invisible somehow.

00:25:25.260 There is some outside force

00:25:26.880 that causes the Biden administration,

00:25:29.880 which means Biden himself.

00:25:31.820 Would you agree that Biden himself

00:25:33.320 is the person in charge

00:25:34.840 of whether it's open or closed?

00:25:36.440 That doesn't stop anywhere else, right?

00:25:39.980 Now, of course, he delegates stuff.

00:25:42.300 Well, no.

00:25:43.160 But in terms of on paper,

00:25:45.020 he's the one in charge of the border.

00:25:48.000 Not common.

00:25:49.560 All right, so that was kind of a shocker

00:25:51.840 to find that RFK Jr.

00:25:53.160 is not only a close-the-border Democrat,

00:25:56.060 he's more close-the-border

00:25:57.340 than any Republican I've ever seen.

00:26:00.880 He has more close-the-border

00:26:02.900 than any Republican I've ever seen

00:26:04.600 because he's got better reasons.

00:26:06.940 He's coming at it with facts.

00:26:08.980 He did his own research.

00:26:10.160 He went there himself.

00:26:11.000 He interviewed busloads of people individually.

00:26:13.480 He actually understands the whole situation.

00:26:16.760 And if you want me to finish this conversation,

00:26:20.520 it goes like this.

00:26:23.080 The cartels, when families come through,

00:26:26.220 they remove the young and attractive

00:26:29.980 trafficable women, 1.00

00:26:32.980 and then they send the rest of the family

00:26:35.560 on their way.

00:26:36.440 That's right.

00:26:37.320 They'll take your sister and your wife, 1.00

00:26:39.980 turn them into prostitutes, 0.99

00:26:41.600 and send you on your way to America. 0.64

00:26:46.260 Now, RFK Jr. explains that.

00:26:49.620 I mean, this is a well-known, understood phenomenon,

00:26:53.040 and he talked to families that had a member taken away

00:26:56.280 to be trafficked.

00:26:58.680 And traffic, by the way, would be the good news.

00:27:01.680 That would be the best outcome.

00:27:03.420 The bad news is rape to death right there 0.99

00:27:07.420 while you're, you know, 100 yards away.

00:27:09.760 So that's what's happening on our border,

00:27:12.000 and that's what the Biden administration,

00:27:14.200 and Biden himself, is specifically allowing.

00:27:17.320 Because they're, you know, quite aware of it,

00:27:20.280 but they're allowing it.

00:27:21.220 Here's the second big change.

00:27:25.040 RFK Jr. says that when he talks about the environment,

00:27:29.400 he rarely talks about climate and climate change risk.

00:27:33.240 Do you know what reason he gave

00:27:34.840 for why he doesn't talk about climate change risk,

00:27:38.040 but rather he tries to talk about the things

00:27:40.340 where everybody would agree,

00:27:42.100 which is better water, better air,

00:27:44.740 and moving toward energy that's less polluting in general?

00:27:50.760 Do you know why he says he's not talking climate change risk?

00:27:55.100 Doesn't believe scientists and doesn't believe the model.

00:27:59.280 Thank you.

00:28:01.380 You know, how long have people been telling me,

00:28:05.000 Scott, why do you keep saying that RFK Jr.

00:28:07.460 says some good things that you like

00:28:09.900 when you know he's like a climate change crazy guy,

00:28:13.360 and he's always been a climate change crazy guy?

00:28:16.880 Well, I could not believe that everything else

00:28:20.120 RFK Jr. said about the experts

00:28:22.140 didn't apply to climate scientists, right?

00:28:26.600 Because he's not coming across as a partisan.

00:28:29.840 He is coming across, right or wrong,

00:28:33.100 like maybe some of his ideas are terrific,

00:28:35.540 maybe some of them are terrible, I don't know.

00:28:37.520 I'm not the one really to judge them all.

00:28:39.360 But I know he's not being partisan.

00:28:41.740 I know he's not just playing for a team.

00:28:43.360 And his skepticism about scientists who are, you know,

00:28:48.000 paid for their opinions, basically.

00:28:50.140 His skepticism does apply to climate change models.

00:28:54.220 Exactly as you think it should have.

00:28:58.840 Am I wrong?

00:29:00.260 Isn't everything that RFK Jr. has said about pharma,

00:29:04.100 big food, you know, big companies polluting,

00:29:07.280 isn't, and, you know, the CIA,

00:29:09.680 I mean, isn't everything he says consistent with not believing the scientific climate change models?

00:29:17.440 It is.

00:29:18.140 That is 100% consistent.

00:29:20.320 He's telling you the entire system is corrupt,

00:29:22.920 and so he doesn't believe any of the corrupt parts.

00:29:26.200 That's pretty good.

00:29:29.440 Now, somebody said to me,

00:29:31.360 but Scott, he said he wants to get rid of coal and oil.

00:29:35.520 Do you think that's true?

00:29:38.420 Do you think it's true that RFK wants to get rid of coal and oil?

00:29:46.100 The answer is incomplete.

00:29:49.740 Incomplete.

00:29:50.400 Yes, he does.

00:29:51.780 Yes, he does want to get rid of them.

00:29:53.260 Do you know what he wants to do to get rid of them?

00:29:55.620 Let the free market get rid of them.

00:29:58.460 That's right.

00:29:59.820 He wants the free market to properly price all of our energy components

00:30:06.380 so that one of them is not accidentally subsidized

00:30:09.420 for no good purpose other than the profits that they subsidized.

00:30:13.800 Now, I don't know if that's a good idea.

00:30:16.840 Sounds like it might be.

00:30:18.780 I mean, it very much could be.

00:30:21.660 I just don't know if the free market is as efficient as he'd like it to be

00:30:25.340 or if we could get it there.

00:30:27.500 But do you hate the fact that he's anti-coal and anti-oil

00:30:32.640 in only the sense that it needs to compete fairly against the green energy,

00:30:37.960 and if it wins, it wins, and if it doesn't, it doesn't.

00:30:42.060 And if it wins for a while and then doesn't, that's the free market.

00:30:46.100 But he's not worried about the climate models

00:30:48.340 and the risk of us being killed.

00:30:50.660 He wants to breathe and eat and go to the doctor

00:30:55.520 without getting fucked up by assholes. 0.99

00:30:59.940 That's it.

00:31:01.480 That's pretty reasonable.

00:31:03.260 Now, I'm not endorsing him.

00:31:05.020 I'm just saying that when you see somebody enter the race 1.00

00:31:07.940 in a nonpartisan fashion

00:31:09.520 and look at, like, really, really show complete,

00:31:12.660 complete, I would say, complete credibility

00:31:15.620 in the way he talks about the issues.

00:31:18.920 You don't have to agree with him,

00:31:20.800 but he's definitely trying.

00:31:22.800 He's trying to include the evidence

00:31:25.740 that one side always likes to ignore,

00:31:28.800 you know, in both cases.

00:31:30.800 Now, that doesn't make him your candidate, right?

00:31:32.800 You may disagree with him on an abortion or something else.

00:31:35.380 But, my God, he's doing a good job.

00:31:39.260 And he's doing a great job for the country,

00:31:42.060 you know, just helping us shape our arguments

00:31:43.820 and how we think about this stuff.

00:31:45.400 I mean, a great job.

00:31:46.600 If the only thing RFK Jr. did

00:31:48.760 was create this border documentary

00:31:52.400 and inform us what's really going on

00:31:54.580 for the first time, in my case,

00:31:56.800 I think others might have known it,

00:31:58.940 but that's a tremendous, tremendous benefit

00:32:02.760 to the country.

00:32:04.320 That's pure good citizenship.

00:32:09.380 Now, you know, I tell you,

00:32:11.280 if Ivek is amazing every day,

00:32:13.180 and again, he's created some more videos

00:32:15.780 where his take is the best one.

00:32:17.580 He was talking about Taiwan.

00:32:20.220 See if you don't think this is the cleanest take on Taiwan.

00:32:25.140 I'm not saying it's the best,

00:32:26.360 because I'm not sure any solution is perfect.

00:32:30.880 But he says that as long as Taiwan

00:32:32.820 is our vital source of microchips,

00:32:37.340 and we're not really that close to replacing them,

00:32:41.380 he says as long as that's true,

00:32:43.080 China's not going to take Taiwan if he's president.

00:32:46.040 Just period.

00:32:47.020 It's just not going to happen.

00:32:48.560 Whatever it takes,

00:32:49.700 they're not going to take Taiwan 0.88

00:32:50.880 under these circumstances.

00:32:53.280 But here's the nuance.

00:32:54.760 He says once America, you know,

00:32:58.040 recaptures its ability to do advanced microchips,

00:33:01.200 he says that it's a civil war.

00:33:03.320 And then you have to recalibrate,

00:33:06.080 because at that point,

00:33:07.000 we would not have a vital security interest.

00:33:10.220 But until then,

00:33:11.300 he would float, you know,

00:33:13.640 maybe destroyers or crews or whatever

00:33:16.260 through the straits

00:33:17.560 to make sure that China knows

00:33:19.700 that we're not going to give up our microchips.

00:33:22.160 That's just not going to happen.

00:33:25.040 Pretty good.

00:33:26.560 Pretty good.

00:33:27.480 I don't know if it's complete.

00:33:29.660 It's pretty good.

00:33:31.180 You know, for somebody whose message is,

00:33:33.580 let's take care of ourselves.

00:33:38.940 All right.

00:33:40.440 I've got a troll on here that's,

00:33:42.380 I feel like the good trolls take the summer off.

00:33:44.640 Like, it'll be until September

00:33:47.000 until somebody really trolls me good.

00:33:49.820 But I'm getting the all caps trolls.

00:33:54.340 I think the all caps trolls

00:33:55.980 are the ones who are even

00:33:59.000 disregarded by other trolls.

00:34:02.360 I think even other trolls

00:34:03.860 like have a hierarchy of trolling.

00:34:06.380 It's like, oh,

00:34:07.800 you're an all caps troll, aren't you?

00:34:09.860 I go for more of the emotional stuff.

00:34:14.940 I'll try to find what people,

00:34:16.420 what somebody is saying politically.

00:34:19.560 I'll try to say what they're saying politically.

00:34:21.380 But then I'll go after them

00:34:22.640 for whatever personal tragedy they had.

00:34:25.780 Like, that's a higher end troll.

00:34:27.500 But even they don't like the all caps trolls.

00:34:29.920 It's like, you're making us look bad.

00:34:31.960 You know, I just said something

00:34:33.000 about his dead stepson.

00:34:34.620 And I think I nailed it.

00:34:35.580 And then you made me look bad

00:34:36.640 with your all caps comment.

00:34:37.900 Could you please take your all caps

00:34:39.960 to the lower league of trolling

00:34:43.140 and not make us all look bad?

00:34:46.660 All right, here's a question for you.

00:34:48.780 Rasmussen did a poll.

00:34:51.080 How many people do you believe,

00:34:52.720 who are likely voters,

00:34:54.760 believe that as a vice presidential running mate,

00:34:57.800 Kamala Harris helps Biden's chances in 2024?

00:35:01.600 How many think that she helps his chances?

00:35:05.260 Oh, yeah, that's a pretty good guess.

00:35:06.540 It's 22%.

00:35:08.600 But your guess of 25% was really close.

00:35:13.400 Again, the smartest audience ever.

00:35:17.220 And I did note that many of you had the answer

00:35:19.520 before I asked the question.

00:35:21.120 And you won't see that on the live streams.

00:35:24.800 Right?

00:35:25.460 You watch another live stream,

00:35:26.800 usually it's like somebody will ask a question,

00:35:28.900 and then there'll be the answer.

00:35:30.360 Because that's the slower viewers,

00:35:32.700 that's the way they do it.

00:35:33.540 It's like, I've got to wait for the question.

00:35:36.100 Oh, here's the answer.

00:35:37.560 So slow.

00:35:38.700 So old.

00:35:40.000 No, my viewers give the answer before the question,

00:35:43.400 and that's the way to do it.

00:35:46.040 Here's an update on my book.

00:35:47.520 You know I've got a new book, Reframe Your Brain,

00:35:50.340 because my publisher canceled me.

00:35:52.400 The update is I am banned for life on Amazon KDP.

00:35:57.180 Now, that's the service that independent publishers use

00:35:59.780 to put books on Amazon, so to make it available.

00:36:04.700 Now, the reason for banning me for life

00:36:07.100 is that I don't own my own book, they say.

00:36:13.380 Now, I do own my book.

00:36:14.500 I own all the rights.

00:36:15.680 I have all the documentation.

00:36:17.200 I have the assignment documents,

00:36:18.980 which have been provided to them from the start.

00:36:22.720 So from the start, they had the documents showing my ownership.

00:36:26.220 But when we say,

00:36:28.320 what's wrong with my documents showing my ownership,

00:36:31.300 they say, well, we'll have to study this in Quebec,

00:36:34.660 and then they study it, and they say,

00:36:36.760 you're still banned for life.

00:36:38.720 And then I say, yeah, but, like, why?

00:36:40.960 Is there somebody you think owns it?

00:36:43.960 Or do you think that I'm not me?

00:36:46.920 And they say, banned for life, confirmed.

00:36:49.640 We'll get, well, five days, we're going to look at it again.

00:36:52.380 Now, it took me a while,

00:36:53.660 because these were email exchanges with the support.

00:36:57.780 It took me a while to realize I'm talking to an AI.

00:37:02.220 I'm pretty sure the responses didn't have any tells for a human.

00:37:05.860 Now, they were signed by a human name,

00:37:09.680 so several of the messages had different names.

00:37:11.620 There was Christopher, and there was somebody else.

00:37:14.340 But the message, and two of them came back identical, right?

00:37:17.940 So I know they weren't reading the message.

00:37:20.000 Now, I made sure that I wrote my message in a way, the last one,

00:37:25.520 that it would be impossible to ignore what I said

00:37:29.640 and simply say some canned response, but I got a canned response.

00:37:32.980 And it would have been impossible for a human to ignore what I said.

00:37:37.340 So I don't have any way to even figure it out.

00:37:41.640 So we're going to look for alternatives, and we'll see if we can solve it.

00:37:45.900 Now, before you go all conspiracy theory,

00:37:49.240 there's no indication it's anything but maybe a system problem.

00:37:54.080 Probably, if I had to guess, it's because my old publisher

00:37:58.200 had some placeholders online for the future book,

00:38:04.220 and maybe those are confusing the system.

00:38:06.900 It's probably some AI system that checks content

00:38:09.140 to make sure you check something, to make sure you own it.

00:38:13.120 Now, it is not a conspiracy theory.

00:38:17.120 I don't think this is part of cancellation.

00:38:18.880 Now, it is true that I was cancelled in newspapers

00:38:23.060 primarily because the Washington Post, I think,

00:38:25.840 was the leading entity that cancelled me.

00:38:29.660 And then the other newspapers said,

00:38:31.180 oh, if the Washington Post does it, we all have to do it.

00:38:34.160 So the Washington Post is owned by Jeff Bezos,

00:38:36.960 who's a notable Democrat,

00:38:39.960 and he also owns Amazon, which just banned me for life.

00:38:43.700 So the two Jeff Bezos properties have banned me for life

00:38:48.120 to make it impossible to be a public figure and earn a living.

00:38:52.700 But we're going to still call that a coincidence.

00:38:58.400 All right?

00:38:59.920 Now, because the problem is he owns so many things

00:39:04.360 that the odds of running into him are pretty high.

00:39:08.760 The odds of running into a Bezos something is pretty high.

00:39:11.780 So it doesn't mean that he's behind anything.

00:39:16.180 However, if I were him, I'd be deeply embarrassed.

00:39:19.680 Imagine being the guy who owns Amazon,

00:39:22.540 which is basically a bastion of free speech.

00:39:27.840 You know, maybe, in my opinion,

00:39:30.380 Amazon's one of the greatest companies ever created.

00:39:33.380 You know, Amazon is more than just a company.

00:39:35.360 It's like, it's amazing.

00:39:37.420 You know, they do such a good job at Amazon,

00:39:41.340 the software and the technology,

00:39:43.440 that you forget how many mistakes somebody could make

00:39:47.780 with this business.

00:39:49.840 The fact that they operate so well,

00:39:52.160 I mean, it's not perfect,

00:39:53.200 but they operate so well in an amazing, complex environment,

00:39:57.120 it's just jaw-dropping every time I see it.

00:39:59.240 So I think Amazon's one of the greatest companies of all time.

00:40:02.060 I mean, that's not saying anything shocking.

00:40:04.420 So, great company.

00:40:07.500 And I don't think Jeff Bezos is sitting around

00:40:09.840 worrying about what Scott does.

00:40:12.040 So I think it would be highly unlikely

00:40:13.640 that he had made some personal decisions in any way.

00:40:17.180 But, if I were him, I'd be pretty embarrassed

00:40:19.300 if two of my major properties

00:40:22.080 had banned me for life over bullshit. 0.89

00:40:24.960 So, that's where we are.

00:40:29.320 I'm working with Joshua Lysak.

00:40:31.220 We'll work out the business options.

00:40:32.860 Apparently, we have some options.

00:40:35.720 So it's not like I'll be banned

00:40:37.060 and never be able to put the book out.

00:40:39.640 It'll be available somewhere.

00:40:42.900 Probably in the next week or two.

00:40:45.480 Probably.

00:40:46.480 The hardcover so far has not been stopped

00:40:49.480 because it's going to come through a different path.

00:40:52.440 But they might stop it.

00:40:54.140 That would be consistent.

00:40:55.840 So that's the update on that.

00:40:57.620 All right.

00:40:59.600 Mike Sertovich's warning of genocide,

00:41:01.660 he says that the situation in the United States

00:41:06.280 is fitting a pattern of polarization and demonization.

00:41:11.100 And there's a pretty well-known pattern

00:41:14.160 that gets you to genocide.

00:41:19.040 Dehumanization, let's say, by the media.

00:41:22.380 Debanking.

00:41:23.260 We're seeing that.

00:41:24.340 And then prosecutions that you think are bullshit.

00:41:27.300 So every one of those things

00:41:29.600 is happening right now in the United States.

00:41:31.700 Does that mean we're going to have

00:41:33.260 a full breakdown of civilization?

00:41:37.740 And people will be killing people in the streets?

00:41:41.880 I don't think so.

00:41:43.480 You know, I actually don't...

00:41:45.000 I just don't feel it.

00:41:46.320 I don't feel it in the zeitgeist at all.

00:41:48.800 I don't feel it outside of social media.

00:41:51.600 And social media doesn't have arms and legs.

00:41:54.080 I don't know.

00:42:00.120 I don't feel it at all.

00:42:01.920 But, you know, I don't spend a lot of time around people.

00:42:04.580 So do you?

00:42:06.520 Do you feel it in your real life?

00:42:09.180 In your real life,

00:42:10.220 is anybody, like, cleaning their guns

00:42:11.880 and getting ready to go to war?

00:42:15.200 When you say you feel it,

00:42:16.720 but do you feel it in your daily life?

00:42:18.880 Forget about social media.

00:42:21.060 Forget about social media.

00:42:22.100 In your daily life,

00:42:23.600 you feel like there's a civil war coming?

00:42:27.240 I don't see anything like that.

00:42:30.220 A lot of people are saying yes, by the way.

00:42:32.340 But my opinion is

00:42:34.580 that you may be biased by social media

00:42:37.800 to see it.

00:42:40.080 But although some of you probably have family members

00:42:42.500 who are so spoiled,

00:42:45.140 even your own family looks like a civil war at this point.

00:42:47.700 All right.

00:42:55.160 So I'm going to be counter to that,

00:42:57.460 but I think he makes a warning

00:42:59.080 that you should pay attention to,

00:43:00.820 which is this stuff can get in the hand really quickly.

00:43:04.480 So where he and I will agree completely,

00:43:07.140 two places.

00:43:08.440 All the signs are there.

00:43:10.440 I agree with that.

00:43:11.940 You know, if you go down the list,

00:43:13.260 all the signs are there.

00:43:14.160 And number two,

00:43:17.240 it can happen quickly.

00:43:21.740 So you can say to yourself,

00:43:23.080 yeah, yeah, Scott, the signs are there.

00:43:25.180 But, you know,

00:43:25.880 we'd have lots of a warning before it got that bad.

00:43:28.500 No.

00:43:29.140 No, you wouldn't.

00:43:30.520 That's really important to know.

00:43:31.960 You wouldn't have a lot of warning

00:43:33.120 because you have a lot of warning right now.

00:43:35.980 So if you're telling yourself

00:43:37.140 we'd have lots of warning to correct,

00:43:38.980 this is the warning.

00:43:40.880 Where's the correction?

00:43:42.960 You're warned.

00:43:44.520 You couldn't be warned any clearer than this.

00:43:48.120 But as somebody else pointed out,

00:43:50.520 what's it mean when the country is heavily armed?

00:43:53.800 And the answer is,

00:43:55.380 we're going to stay solid

00:43:56.800 because we're too heavily armed.

00:44:01.600 Yeah.

00:44:02.220 And the arming gives you a little confidence

00:44:05.260 and you can make the political system

00:44:07.580 do what you want eventually.

00:44:08.580 So I think we'll be fine.

00:44:11.060 It could get worse before it gets better,

00:44:12.800 but I don't think we're going to full genocide.

00:44:18.200 Trump, apparently they want to get a Trump mugshot,

00:44:21.320 but there's some,

00:44:22.360 I think there's some possibility

00:44:24.180 they could make that go away

00:44:25.540 because it's not necessary

00:44:26.800 for the most famous face in the world.

00:44:28.640 The reason you do mugshots, I'm told,

00:44:31.340 is in case somebody tries to escape the law.

00:44:34.120 You've got a picture of them for later.

00:44:35.520 But if you're the most famous face in the world,

00:44:39.380 do you really need a mugshot?

00:44:41.400 Where is he going to hide?

00:44:44.280 But this gives me the question,

00:44:45.720 I think maybe he won't do it,

00:44:48.100 but if he does do it,

00:44:49.520 the biggest question I have is,

00:44:51.400 does he go for the smile or the power stare?

00:44:56.340 Right?

00:44:56.760 Because you see this smile when he poses for pictures.

00:45:00.080 His smile isn't his best look.

00:45:02.900 I mean, it's good that he can smile,

00:45:04.600 but he has sort of a smile for the camera's look

00:45:07.440 that's not ideal.

00:45:09.860 You know what I mean?

00:45:11.280 The I'm smiling because I'm on camera look,

00:45:13.780 that's not your best smile.

00:45:15.740 But you do what you can if you're a politician.

00:45:17.860 You've got to show the teeth, right?

00:45:21.180 But he has a power stare that's killer,

00:45:25.080 wouldn't you say?

00:45:25.880 The power stare.

00:45:26.660 I don't know if I can do it,

00:45:27.840 but it'd be something like this.

00:45:30.920 You know, the dad's coming home stare.

00:45:33.420 The one I want to see is the dad coming home stare.

00:45:37.200 The one that says,

00:45:38.880 just wait.

00:45:41.020 Just wait.

00:45:42.260 That's the one I want to see.

00:45:44.040 And as Sticks and Hammer said,

00:45:46.660 it's going to be the most memed image of all time.

00:45:50.580 Nothing will be more memed than his mugshot.

00:45:53.540 So I say, do the mugshot.

00:45:57.760 Do the mugshot.

00:45:59.820 His base is waiting,

00:46:01.880 like they're waiting at their computers.

00:46:04.740 Do it.

00:46:05.760 Do it.

00:46:06.900 Do it.

00:46:07.920 Do it.

00:46:10.280 All right.

00:46:13.120 Trump.

00:46:13.720 All right.

00:46:17.800 Trump does a video in which he's claiming the election was rigged.

00:46:21.780 And he's calling the people who did it.

00:46:25.340 Rigors. 0.97

00:46:29.640 How long did it take for somebody in social media to say,

00:46:35.060 rigors?

00:46:36.540 Wait a minute.

00:46:37.240 Is this another one of those racist things he's saying without saying it?

00:46:43.660 Is this,

00:46:43.980 is this racist mafia talk?

00:46:46.240 Does he really mean the N word,

00:46:48.080 but he's using the R word to try to beat it in some kind of a clever workaround?

00:46:53.440 No.

00:46:54.660 Do you think he's calling people who do elections the N word?

00:46:58.920 No.

00:46:59.340 But do you think that,

00:47:03.640 do you think it ever crossed his mind that it would make a lot of trouble if he used the word?

00:47:10.260 Maybe.

00:47:12.300 Maybe.

00:47:13.260 Which would be freaking hilarious.

00:47:15.620 It would be hilarious.

00:47:18.080 So,

00:47:19.140 rig up,

00:47:19.900 please.

00:47:20.780 Anyway.

00:47:24.000 In my opinion,

00:47:25.440 reality is already starting to bend.

00:47:30.200 All right.

00:47:30.540 The reality that we're told is reality that is that the election was clean.

00:47:35.120 And the way that you know the election was clean is that they didn't find any problems.

00:47:41.240 And half of the country thinks that makes sense.

00:47:44.640 All right.

00:47:45.080 Let me say it again so we can laugh at half of the country.

00:47:47.820 Half of the country will say this on social media in public like they think it makes sense

00:47:55.500 and that you're dumb for not understanding. 0.61

00:47:58.120 Here's what they say.

00:48:00.260 The elections were definitely clean because there's no publicly known information that would refute that.

00:48:08.380 It's 2023 and people will say that in public.

00:48:12.300 And they'll think,

00:48:13.220 well,

00:48:13.340 this is the smart take.

00:48:14.880 The smart take is that they didn't find any problems.

00:48:17.580 So,

00:48:17.880 therefore,

00:48:18.200 it's clean.

00:48:20.040 Now,

00:48:20.540 I don't need to even say anything about that,

00:48:22.220 do I?

00:48:23.340 Imagine that,

00:48:24.120 imagine that,

00:48:25.080 stop it.

00:48:28.360 Stop it.

00:48:33.580 I'm not even going to read that comment.

00:48:35.860 Stop it.

00:48:37.240 Just stop it.

00:48:38.380 All right.

00:48:40.980 I'll tell you about it later.

00:48:43.460 I'll tell you,

00:48:44.240 I'll tell you about it during the man cave.

00:48:45.960 It was,

00:48:46.340 it was too inappropriate for public,

00:48:48.440 but it was funny.

00:48:50.720 All right.

00:48:51.200 Let's not insult anybody if we don't need to,

00:48:53.740 unless they have it coming.

00:48:58.560 So,

00:48:59.280 I lost my train of thought.

00:49:01.200 That was just too funny.

00:49:02.480 All right.

00:49:03.320 Train of thought.

00:49:03.980 back online.

00:49:05.320 Stop it.

00:49:06.180 Stop it.

00:49:10.300 You're terrible.

00:49:11.880 Stop it.

00:49:15.740 So,

00:49:16.200 here's what I think.

00:49:18.240 I can almost feel

00:49:20.140 the simulation

00:49:22.120 changing.

00:49:24.480 Now,

00:49:24.960 of course,

00:49:25.280 this is just,

00:49:25.860 you know,

00:49:26.060 a mental phenomenon.

00:49:27.200 I'm not,

00:49:27.420 I'm not saying we're necessarily in a simulation,

00:49:29.720 but it seems like it.

00:49:31.900 And,

00:49:32.360 and here's,

00:49:33.020 here's what the simulation

00:49:33.960 requires.

00:49:35.300 It requires Trump to be in the greatest

00:49:37.560 legal jeopardy,

00:49:39.380 whatever that looks like.

00:49:40.660 It looks like we're approaching it.

00:49:42.680 The greatest legal jeopardy.

00:49:44.600 And it should be about the,

00:49:46.500 his claims that the election was fake.

00:49:49.520 And then,

00:49:51.240 in the nick of time,

00:49:55.180 there's going to be a discovery

00:49:56.640 that the election was actually fraudulent.

00:49:59.780 Now,

00:50:00.700 I do not have any evidence

00:50:03.060 that I think is credible

00:50:05.300 that I think is credible

00:50:05.320 a fraud.

00:50:06.760 I do have

00:50:07.860 credible people

00:50:09.440 saying,

00:50:10.680 you know,

00:50:10.980 if you look online,

00:50:12.320 there are people

00:50:13.160 who are credible to me

00:50:14.440 who are saying

00:50:15.760 that they found things

00:50:16.920 and this is the,

00:50:17.660 this is the new kraken.

00:50:19.280 But I'm too primed

00:50:21.700 not to accept a new kraken.

00:50:24.120 Is anybody with me on that?

00:50:26.320 Yeah,

00:50:26.620 I've been,

00:50:27.000 I've been slapped so hard

00:50:28.320 that,

00:50:29.380 you know,

00:50:29.700 I'm not,

00:50:30.060 I'm not going to endorse any krakens, 1.00

00:50:31.960 even if they look good on paper.

00:50:33.360 Because remember,

00:50:34.640 a lot of the claims

00:50:35.640 looked really good on paper,

00:50:37.420 didn't they?

00:50:38.260 And I warned you from the beginning

00:50:39.600 that even if something is fraudulent,

00:50:42.480 which I didn't know,

00:50:44.480 that there would be 95%

00:50:46.140 of the claims

00:50:47.200 would be debunked

00:50:48.320 and properly debunked.

00:50:50.640 And that's what we saw.

00:50:52.200 You know,

00:50:52.640 we saw so far 100% debunked.

00:50:55.660 That's the official story.

00:50:57.500 But do you think that means

00:50:59.000 they don't exist?

00:50:59.800 I guess I went through that before.

00:51:03.080 But it feels to me

00:51:04.280 like the reality,

00:51:08.640 the simulation,

00:51:10.520 the zeitgeist,

00:51:11.920 every part of my body

00:51:13.720 thinks he's going to pull

00:51:14.880 a rabbit out of a hat.

00:51:16.480 Why do I feel that?

00:51:18.060 I feel it like it's already happened.

00:51:20.840 I feel it like a fact in the future.

00:51:23.620 But I have no evidence for it.

00:51:25.580 No evidence whatsoever.

00:51:27.340 There's nothing I see,

00:51:28.660 nothing,

00:51:30.580 that tells me

00:51:31.200 that's going to happen,

00:51:32.140 except it just feels like it.

00:51:34.400 It just frickin' feels like it.

00:51:37.040 And I feel like

00:51:38.300 this feels like a thing

00:51:40.180 is more meaningful

00:51:41.900 than it sounds.

00:51:44.000 You know,

00:51:44.280 if it were nothing

00:51:45.080 but a feeling.

00:51:46.560 But man,

00:51:47.180 it feels like

00:51:47.800 just there's too much going on.

00:51:51.140 The frothiness of the topic,

00:51:54.440 you can just feel it.

00:51:55.860 And I would actually

00:51:57.120 be surprised at this point

00:51:58.700 if he doesn't have

00:52:00.180 a third act

00:52:00.960 that shows there was

00:52:02.060 at least some meaningful fraud

00:52:04.560 in at least one important place.

00:52:07.500 And if it turns out

00:52:08.640 to be Georgia,

00:52:09.980 oh my God.

00:52:11.780 Oh my God.

00:52:14.180 Now I have no reason

00:52:14.960 to believe it would be.

00:52:16.160 No reason at all.

00:52:17.740 But I feel it.

00:52:20.020 I feel it.

00:52:22.360 Well, of course,

00:52:23.220 Alan Dershowitz

00:52:24.000 has weighed in

00:52:24.720 on the Trump charges.

00:52:25.880 he largely thinks

00:52:27.940 that they're a political joke.

00:52:29.400 And I love reading

00:52:30.580 the Democrats

00:52:31.580 who are giving me

00:52:33.120 a hard time online

00:52:34.080 because they're quite sure

00:52:37.160 that with this many indictments,

00:52:40.140 oh my God,

00:52:41.020 so many indictments,

00:52:42.500 I think there's 10,000 now, right?

00:52:44.480 10,000 indictments

00:52:45.640 or something.

00:52:47.360 10 or 13 or 72

00:52:48.860 or some number.

00:52:50.260 So therefore,

00:52:51.200 he's clearly a criminal.

00:52:52.520 It's been proven 0.60

00:52:53.320 by the indictments.

00:52:55.880 But of course,

00:52:56.800 indictments are easy to get.

00:52:58.220 It doesn't mean

00:52:58.660 anybody's guilty.

00:53:00.440 And Dershowitz basically

00:53:01.620 thinks the charges

00:53:02.540 are political

00:53:04.200 and ridiculous

00:53:05.460 and will,

00:53:06.800 no matter what happens

00:53:07.740 in the lower courts,

00:53:09.240 the Supreme Court

00:53:10.120 will laugh at them

00:53:10.940 and toss them out.

00:53:11.980 And that's his prediction.

00:53:13.920 Now, if you're a Democrat

00:53:15.280 and you're not

00:53:16.180 one of the top lawyers

00:53:18.800 of all time,

00:53:20.200 don't you feel

00:53:22.420 a little silly

00:53:23.120 saying that the walls

00:53:25.060 are closing in,

00:53:25.780 they got him this time?

00:53:26.980 As long as Dershowitz

00:53:29.020 is over here saying,

00:53:30.200 no, I'm predicting

00:53:30.940 this will all go away.

00:53:32.840 You know,

00:53:33.260 it'll affect the elections,

00:53:34.380 of course,

00:53:34.760 but in the end,

00:53:36.020 it's all transparently,

00:53:38.220 obviously,

00:53:39.700 weak and political

00:53:40.860 and the Supreme Court

00:53:42.700 will just wipe it away

00:53:43.780 like schmutz from their eye.

00:53:47.880 Terrible analogy.

00:53:48.760 So, he also points out

00:53:52.540 that RICO,

00:53:53.560 which, you know,

00:53:54.720 and of course,

00:53:55.980 Dershowitz has been

00:53:56.760 everywhere that's important

00:53:57.900 in the law,

00:53:59.140 so he's like,

00:53:59.940 his personal friend

00:54:01.240 is the one who invented

00:54:02.140 the RICO,

00:54:03.280 the RICO statutes.

00:54:04.620 He knows everything

00:54:05.360 about RICO, right?

00:54:07.020 And he says,

00:54:08.200 it wasn't meant

00:54:09.020 for political people

00:54:11.200 doing political stuff.

00:54:12.500 I mean,

00:54:12.640 it was meant

00:54:13.020 for other purposes.

00:54:14.440 It's been repurposed

00:54:15.420 from mafia

00:54:16.740 to some other things.

00:54:19.020 But it made sense

00:54:20.100 when they repurposed it.

00:54:21.200 He doesn't think

00:54:21.760 this application

00:54:23.400 of RICO

00:54:23.980 is going to stand

00:54:26.020 the full test

00:54:27.940 to the Supreme Court,

00:54:29.040 I guess.

00:54:32.520 Dershowitz points out,

00:54:33.600 and I haven't heard

00:54:34.160 this anywhere else,

00:54:35.240 that the judge

00:54:36.100 in this case

00:54:36.760 lied in public,

00:54:38.320 knows she lied,

00:54:39.280 and everybody else

00:54:39.980 knows she lied.

00:54:40.680 and it's basically

00:54:44.100 going to be a trial

00:54:45.360 about somebody lying.

00:54:48.520 But anyway,

00:54:49.060 the judge said

00:54:49.820 they're trying to wrap

00:54:51.120 it up in six months,

00:54:52.600 and Dershowitz just

00:54:53.440 laughs at that

00:54:54.300 because the other thing

00:54:55.740 she said is that

00:54:56.540 she's going to trial

00:54:57.360 the many defendants

00:54:58.880 sort of simultaneously,

00:55:01.020 and Dershowitz points out

00:55:02.380 with that many defendants,

00:55:04.060 you could have 50 lawyers

00:55:05.940 in the room

00:55:06.760 just for the defendants.

00:55:08.480 Let's say they have

00:55:09.200 two apiece.

00:55:10.320 And 50 lawyers

00:55:12.260 dealing with every motion.

00:55:14.680 So somebody could say

00:55:15.680 something like,

00:55:16.320 I'd like to move

00:55:17.500 the venue,

00:55:18.180 and then somebody else

00:55:18.860 could say,

00:55:19.260 I like this venue.

00:55:20.960 And all 50 of them

00:55:22.160 would have to hammer it out.

00:55:24.260 So that you have

00:55:25.120 a process that not only

00:55:26.600 can't be done

00:55:27.400 in six months,

00:55:29.020 but it's really,

00:55:30.240 really, really,

00:55:31.180 really obvious

00:55:32.540 that the judge was lying

00:55:34.380 because nothing

00:55:35.240 could be done,

00:55:36.080 nothing of that complexity

00:55:37.200 could be done

00:55:38.460 in six months

00:55:39.240 under those conditions.

00:55:40.980 It just can't happen.

00:55:42.340 It's undoable.

00:55:44.660 And our,

00:55:46.260 is it the prosecutor?

00:55:48.240 No, it was the judge.

00:55:49.000 I think it was the judge,

00:55:49.740 wasn't it?

00:55:50.880 Oh, the DA.

00:55:52.280 Oh, I'm being fact-checked.

00:55:53.900 It was the DA,

00:55:54.660 not the judge.

00:55:56.080 Thank you.

00:55:57.020 Thank you.

00:55:57.500 DA, not the judge.

00:55:59.580 That's an important correction.

00:56:01.520 It's the DA

00:56:02.220 who said it would be

00:56:02.980 six months,

00:56:03.580 not the judge.

00:56:04.100 All right.

00:56:05.120 Thank you for that.

00:56:06.760 So that's the beauty

00:56:07.560 of the live format.

00:56:08.960 I love being fact-checked

00:56:10.280 in real time.

00:56:12.440 I think that really helps.

00:56:14.800 All right.

00:56:16.180 So the biggest,

00:56:17.540 I think one of the biggest keys

00:56:18.860 to this,

00:56:20.300 the Trump charges,

00:56:22.240 are that perfect phone call,

00:56:24.520 as he says.

00:56:25.540 Do you remember

00:56:26.260 how many times you've seen

00:56:27.580 that we need to find

00:56:32.520 11,780 votes?

00:56:35.660 You've seen that

00:56:36.400 in the headlines.

00:56:37.700 You've seen it from pundits.

00:56:39.380 You've seen it on the news,

00:56:40.680 right?

00:56:41.380 So that's all true

00:56:42.420 because it's on the news.

00:56:44.360 It's quoted.

00:56:45.860 And you've probably even seen

00:56:46.940 or you've probably even heard audio

00:56:48.760 of him saying it.

00:56:50.640 Have you not?

00:56:52.260 Well, I found out today

00:56:53.800 that this was always a Rupar

00:56:56.080 and I didn't know it.

00:56:57.940 Now, if you're new to me,

00:56:59.860 a Rupar,

00:57:00.980 R-U-P-A-R, 1.00

00:57:02.900 refers to a video,

00:57:04.460 but it could apply

00:57:05.100 to audio as well,

00:57:06.240 in which you delete part of it

00:57:08.560 and here's the weird characteristic

00:57:10.620 of a Rupar.

00:57:12.140 Deleting part of it

00:57:13.560 reverses its meaning,

00:57:16.180 reverses it.

00:57:17.040 It doesn't just take

00:57:17.800 a nuance away,

00:57:18.940 it actually reverses it.

00:57:20.320 So, for example,

00:57:22.920 some Rupars were

00:57:24.120 the fine people hoax.

00:57:25.860 If you take away the part

00:57:27.040 where he says,

00:57:28.120 immediately after he said

00:57:29.200 fine people,

00:57:30.320 he said,

00:57:30.880 I'm not talking about

00:57:31.700 the neo-Nazis,

00:57:32.680 they should be condemned

00:57:33.560 completely.

00:57:34.680 If you remove that,

00:57:36.140 which they did,

00:57:37.560 it reverses the meaning

00:57:38.720 from disavowing Nazis,

00:57:40.780 which he said explicitly,

00:57:42.780 to complimenting them

00:57:44.560 and supporting Nazis.

00:57:45.720 It's a complete reversal

00:57:46.940 by removing one part.

00:57:48.660 Likewise,

00:57:50.280 with the drinking bleach hoax,

00:57:52.680 when they remove

00:57:53.640 the part before

00:57:54.920 he talks about it

00:57:55.900 and immediately after,

00:57:57.840 those are the two

00:57:58.700 clarifications.

00:58:00.520 The clarifications were

00:58:01.700 that he was talking

00:58:02.240 about light

00:58:02.940 being brought

00:58:04.020 into the lungs,

00:58:04.840 you know,

00:58:05.020 literally putting a stent

00:58:06.640 down there or something

00:58:07.340 and shining light

00:58:08.040 on the lungs

00:58:08.560 as a possible disinfectant.

00:58:10.960 The news removed

00:58:12.680 the reference of light

00:58:13.920 on both ends

00:58:15.000 and he made sure

00:58:16.260 he put it on both ends

00:58:17.160 so you wouldn't be confused.

00:58:18.660 So they removed it

00:58:20.020 and reported it

00:58:21.240 and that changed it to

00:58:22.340 he wants you to drink bleach.

00:58:24.740 Now drinking bleach

00:58:25.560 is not even similar

00:58:26.580 in any way

00:58:27.360 to shining light

00:58:28.680 down your lungs. 0.58

00:58:32.860 Now I'm watching

00:58:33.840 some people

00:58:34.900 who are finding this out

00:58:36.040 for the first time.

00:58:37.800 Imagine you're watching

00:58:38.940 this live stream

00:58:39.740 right now

00:58:40.240 and you're hearing this

00:58:41.680 for the first time

00:58:42.880 and I just saw

00:58:44.400 somebody go LOL. 0.76

00:58:46.960 Sorry.

00:58:48.380 This is really

00:58:49.460 mind-bending

00:58:50.420 if you haven't

00:58:51.500 heard it before.

00:58:52.760 Here's another one.

00:58:53.840 The overfeeding

00:58:55.280 the koi,

00:58:56.880 the fish,

00:58:58.260 in Japan.

00:58:59.900 So the real video

00:59:01.100 showed he was with,

00:59:03.560 I guess it was

00:59:04.720 President Abe

00:59:05.600 and,

00:59:07.380 or one of the presidents,

00:59:08.360 I forget who it was.

00:59:09.820 I think it was Abe, right?

00:59:10.740 And the two of them

00:59:12.140 were feeding koi fish

00:59:13.260 by throwing some,

00:59:14.420 you know,

00:59:14.720 bread or whatever in

00:59:15.580 and then when

00:59:16.920 they were done,

00:59:18.600 Abe led by dumping 0.97

00:59:20.440 the rest of his fish food

00:59:21.780 in because he was dumb 0.65

00:59:23.120 and then Trump

00:59:24.640 also dumped his in

00:59:25.740 because he was

00:59:26.940 following the leader,

00:59:28.200 literally.

00:59:29.680 When you cut out

00:59:30.660 the part where

00:59:31.380 Abe went first, 0.79

00:59:33.280 the news showed

00:59:34.140 that Trump

00:59:34.880 was a big old dope

00:59:35.960 and instead of

00:59:36.700 feeding the fish

00:59:37.440 like a little at a time,

00:59:38.380 he just dumped

00:59:38.880 his fish food in.

00:59:40.740 That's a Rupar.

00:59:44.720 You remember

00:59:45.460 the Covington kids video?

00:59:48.840 It looked like

00:59:49.740 the teenager

00:59:50.640 was getting in the face

00:59:51.840 of some Native American.

00:59:53.220 Oh my God,

00:59:53.880 that kid fooled me.

00:59:55.540 Fooled me for 24 hours.

00:59:57.900 But it's because

00:59:59.300 they clipped out

01:00:00.300 the part

01:00:00.700 where it was

01:00:01.380 the Native American guy

01:00:02.520 who was actually

01:00:03.420 getting in the face

01:00:04.220 of the kid.

01:00:05.080 It looked opposite

01:00:05.840 if you take that out.

01:00:07.160 So the Rupar,

01:00:08.120 remember that,

01:00:08.640 the Rupar

01:00:09.100 doesn't just change

01:00:10.580 like a detail.

01:00:12.160 It completely changes

01:00:13.860 the story

01:00:14.340 to an opposite

01:00:15.140 or something

01:00:16.180 that's horrible.

01:00:17.160 Horrible in the

01:00:18.020 opposite direction.

01:00:19.780 Right.

01:00:20.120 So in the

01:00:21.040 drinking bleach hoax,

01:00:23.180 Trump was actually

01:00:24.200 ahead of the scientists

01:00:25.580 because he was aware

01:00:27.100 of a trial

01:00:27.760 that was actually

01:00:28.420 being trialed

01:00:29.120 at that time

01:00:29.960 to see if light

01:00:31.200 would work

01:00:31.580 as a disinfectant

01:00:32.560 in the trachea

01:00:33.480 and the lungs.

01:00:34.000 So he knew

01:00:35.340 something

01:00:35.740 above the scientists

01:00:37.540 and the news

01:00:39.220 reversed it

01:00:40.100 to not only

01:00:41.340 did he know

01:00:41.880 more about

01:00:42.540 that one little thing

01:00:43.740 but that he was

01:00:45.280 so dumb

01:00:45.680 he thinks

01:00:46.040 you should

01:00:46.380 drink bleach.

01:00:48.360 Now half

01:00:49.120 of the country

01:00:49.620 actually believed

01:00:50.480 all of those things

01:00:51.560 and still does.

01:00:52.880 Half of the country

01:00:53.440 believes all of those things

01:00:54.620 because a Rupar video

01:00:56.400 is really persuasive.

01:00:59.040 It's really persuasive.

01:01:00.060 So it turns out

01:01:02.940 that this

01:01:03.380 find 11,780 votes

01:01:06.520 wasn't just

01:01:07.080 another Rupar

01:01:07.820 and I didn't find

01:01:09.140 that out

01:01:09.500 until fucking today. 0.92

01:01:12.560 Today is the day

01:01:13.540 I found that out.

01:01:15.320 Can you believe it?

01:01:16.560 Now I'll explain it

01:01:17.440 to you

01:01:17.720 because you might

01:01:18.780 not be aware of it.

01:01:20.100 I know for example

01:01:21.220 Breitbart did report

01:01:22.520 this when it happened

01:01:23.480 but I think we lost

01:01:25.480 you know

01:01:26.120 if you ever knew it

01:01:27.180 you probably forgot it

01:01:28.060 by now.

01:01:28.480 I did.

01:01:30.060 Here's his actual

01:01:32.640 full statement.

01:01:34.200 So this is on audio.

01:01:36.160 We know this is

01:01:37.160 his full statement.

01:01:38.940 So look

01:01:39.600 all I want to do

01:01:40.780 is this.

01:01:41.380 I just want to find

01:01:42.340 11,780 votes

01:01:44.220 which is more

01:01:45.240 than we have

01:01:45.800 because we won

01:01:46.780 the state.

01:01:48.600 Which part

01:01:49.380 do they take out?

01:01:52.280 Because we won

01:01:53.440 the state.

01:01:54.780 If you take out

01:01:55.880 because we won

01:01:56.780 the state

01:01:57.400 which is a very

01:01:58.880 clear statement

01:01:59.880 that he believes

01:02:01.240 that they're

01:02:01.600 trying to take

01:02:02.400 an illegitimate

01:02:03.460 result

01:02:04.020 look at it

01:02:05.600 more closely

01:02:06.280 and come up

01:02:08.060 with a legitimate

01:02:09.000 vote

01:02:09.980 because he thinks

01:02:11.600 he won.

01:02:12.840 What part

01:02:13.620 do they leave out

01:02:14.420 every fucking

01:02:15.480 time?

01:02:17.600 Because we

01:02:18.460 won the state.

01:02:19.740 What is the

01:02:20.540 entire

01:02:21.020 trial is about?

01:02:23.260 His state

01:02:23.920 of mind.

01:02:24.900 Did he really

01:02:25.560 believe he won

01:02:26.260 the state

01:02:26.800 or not?

01:02:28.280 Now this

01:02:29.500 alone would

01:02:30.160 not be

01:02:30.560 evidence of

01:02:31.220 his state

01:02:31.560 of mind

01:02:31.860 because they

01:02:32.200 could just

01:02:32.500 say he was

01:02:32.860 lying.

01:02:33.940 But it is

01:02:34.420 evidence

01:02:34.960 not conclusive

01:02:37.320 but it's more

01:02:38.060 evidence of

01:02:38.920 I would say

01:02:42.940 this is

01:02:43.380 exculpatory.

01:02:46.100 Exculpatory?

01:02:47.080 Am I using

01:02:47.660 that word right?

01:02:48.840 It's evidence

01:02:49.560 that we should

01:02:50.500 be given

01:02:51.280 the public

01:02:52.280 and certainly

01:02:52.960 the court

01:02:53.440 but we should

01:02:54.340 be given this

01:02:54.900 evidence from

01:02:55.520 the beginning

01:02:56.000 because this

01:02:57.040 is the part

01:02:57.560 that gives

01:02:57.940 you context

01:02:58.580 to explain

01:02:59.140 what he was

01:02:59.480 saying.

01:03:00.440 Imagine you

01:03:01.160 heard only

01:03:01.740 this.

01:03:05.920 I just want

01:03:06.820 you to find

01:03:07.440 11,780 votes.

01:03:10.180 Does that

01:03:10.540 sound like

01:03:10.960 mafia talk?

01:03:13.320 Yeah, a little

01:03:14.160 bit.

01:03:14.880 A little bit,

01:03:15.480 doesn't it?

01:03:16.340 Sounds a little

01:03:16.920 bit like mafia

01:03:17.540 talk.

01:03:18.000 It's not

01:03:18.420 guaranteed it's

01:03:19.100 mafia talk

01:03:19.840 but you could

01:03:20.760 easily imagine

01:03:21.520 it, right?

01:03:22.600 You could

01:03:22.900 imagine it.

01:03:23.500 Now you

01:03:24.680 add because

01:03:26.180 we won

01:03:26.820 the state.

01:03:28.060 Is that

01:03:28.400 what the

01:03:28.720 mafia guy

01:03:29.240 says?

01:03:30.040 Does the

01:03:30.420 mafia guy,

01:03:31.360 does the

01:03:31.660 mafia boss

01:03:32.420 say I'd

01:03:33.620 like you

01:03:33.980 to go get

01:03:35.320 that thing

01:03:35.820 that we

01:03:36.160 legally own?

01:03:38.000 Hey,

01:03:39.160 I'd like you

01:03:40.840 to go to

01:03:41.180 the store

01:03:41.580 and get

01:03:43.060 me some

01:03:43.560 products.

01:03:45.180 All right,

01:03:45.640 I'm going

01:03:45.840 to steal

01:03:46.100 some products

01:03:46.620 for you.

01:03:47.220 No, no,

01:03:47.680 no, here's

01:03:48.300 the money.

01:03:49.460 Take the

01:03:49.880 money, go

01:03:51.080 to the store,

01:03:52.540 pay for the

01:03:52.980 products,

01:03:53.500 bring them

01:03:54.380 to me.

01:03:55.740 And the

01:03:56.400 change to?

01:03:57.420 Yes, the

01:03:57.860 change to?

01:03:59.140 Go to the

01:03:59.580 store, pay

01:04:00.700 for the

01:04:00.980 products, put

01:04:02.540 them in a

01:04:02.800 bag, get

01:04:03.800 a receipt,

01:04:04.860 bring it

01:04:05.160 to me.

01:04:06.200 That's what

01:04:06.860 they're accusing

01:04:07.320 him of.

01:04:08.580 They're accusing

01:04:09.520 him of asking

01:04:10.540 for something he

01:04:11.940 is specifically

01:04:12.920 calling out as

01:04:14.300 legal.

01:04:15.960 That's the

01:04:16.660 mafia talk.

01:04:18.200 He might go

01:04:19.000 to jail because

01:04:20.480 of a Rupar

01:04:21.240 audio, which

01:04:23.200 basically has

01:04:23.920 biased the

01:04:24.480 entire world

01:04:25.280 so that by

01:04:26.560 the time you

01:04:27.020 reach the

01:04:27.460 jury pool,

01:04:28.360 you're so

01:04:28.780 polluted that

01:04:29.540 it wouldn't

01:04:30.220 matter what

01:04:30.620 you heard at

01:04:31.060 that point.

01:04:33.260 Yeah, it

01:04:33.980 goes to his

01:04:34.440 intention, and

01:04:35.400 his intention is

01:04:36.620 completely different

01:04:37.680 if he says,

01:04:39.440 I think I

01:04:39.920 won, can you

01:04:41.640 find the

01:04:42.060 evidence of

01:04:42.620 that by

01:04:43.000 looking more

01:04:43.540 carefully?

01:04:45.340 Completely

01:04:45.860 different.

01:04:46.220 Are you

01:04:48.620 using an

01:04:49.120 analogy?

01:04:49.800 No, I'm

01:04:50.320 using several

01:04:51.160 different stories.

01:04:53.440 Oh, the

01:04:53.980 mafia analogy?

01:04:55.220 Is that an

01:04:56.000 analogy?

01:05:00.400 Let me

01:05:00.960 think.

01:05:02.060 It's, let

01:05:03.960 me tell you

01:05:05.120 the right way

01:05:05.660 to use an

01:05:06.140 analogy and

01:05:06.640 the wrong

01:05:06.880 way.

01:05:07.360 The wrong

01:05:07.900 way to use

01:05:08.480 an analogy

01:05:09.000 is that that's

01:05:10.140 your argument.

01:05:11.960 Right?

01:05:12.380 Now, hold on.

01:05:13.320 People think

01:05:13.880 I'm busted.

01:05:14.480 I'm not.

01:05:14.840 I've always

01:05:16.200 said the

01:05:16.540 same.

01:05:17.900 Analogy is a

01:05:18.720 good way to

01:05:19.200 introduce a

01:05:20.880 concept.

01:05:22.740 It's not how

01:05:23.580 you win an

01:05:24.180 argument.

01:05:25.700 So, I

01:05:26.560 think I said

01:05:27.080 very clearly

01:05:27.720 that the

01:05:28.780 argument is

01:05:29.900 that he

01:05:30.260 said he

01:05:31.700 believes he

01:05:32.160 won the

01:05:32.520 state.

01:05:33.140 So, that's

01:05:33.560 the argument.

01:05:34.940 So, the

01:05:35.460 argument doesn't

01:05:36.760 need the

01:05:37.120 analogy.

01:05:38.100 The analogy

01:05:38.940 is in case

01:05:39.680 you didn't

01:05:40.100 catch the

01:05:40.640 argument.

01:05:41.560 It's like

01:05:42.000 another way to

01:05:43.020 bring you into

01:05:43.540 the argument.

01:05:44.140 It's not the

01:05:44.660 argument.

01:05:46.360 So, I'm

01:05:47.200 not winning

01:05:47.660 any arguments

01:05:48.260 by an

01:05:48.720 analogy.

01:05:49.380 I'm using

01:05:49.880 them to

01:05:50.220 further clarify

01:05:51.620 a situation.

01:05:52.760 That is a

01:05:53.460 proper use.

01:05:55.440 The improper

01:05:56.420 use is to

01:05:57.180 say it

01:05:57.600 reminds me of

01:05:58.280 something and

01:05:58.780 therefore.

01:05:59.960 That's not a

01:06:00.680 proper use.

01:06:03.380 All right.

01:06:04.480 But, look at

01:06:05.300 how much you

01:06:05.960 learned today.

01:06:06.480 So, let

01:06:14.640 me run

01:06:16.140 something by

01:06:16.760 you.

01:06:17.880 Can you

01:06:18.620 imagine

01:06:19.080 Trump giving

01:06:20.440 some kind

01:06:21.100 of a speech

01:06:22.380 or national

01:06:23.020 address or

01:06:23.720 something as

01:06:24.660 he's running

01:06:25.000 for office in

01:06:26.420 which he

01:06:26.960 simply lays

01:06:27.920 out how

01:06:28.860 the gears

01:06:29.520 of the

01:06:29.900 machine work?

01:06:32.120 He simply

01:06:32.820 lays out how

01:06:33.660 the Biden

01:06:34.440 crime family

01:06:36.140 does their

01:06:36.980 work, even

01:06:38.200 if the end

01:06:38.960 result is

01:06:39.500 there's no

01:06:40.040 criminal

01:06:40.900 liability.

01:06:43.060 Just lay

01:06:43.760 it out.

01:06:44.580 In case you

01:06:45.040 didn't know,

01:06:45.640 this is how

01:06:46.080 that's done.

01:06:47.060 Then move

01:06:47.580 on to the

01:06:48.760 media and

01:06:50.020 say, all

01:06:50.860 right, here's

01:06:51.200 some things.

01:06:51.700 And you

01:06:51.920 could even

01:06:52.280 use the

01:06:52.720 Peter Zayn

01:06:53.560 explanation that

01:06:55.700 they don't

01:06:56.100 collect real

01:06:56.620 news.

01:06:57.000 They're really

01:06:57.640 opinion

01:06:58.440 manufacturing

01:06:59.260 entities.

01:06:59.800 just sort

01:07:01.060 of describe

01:07:01.580 that world.

01:07:03.020 People will

01:07:03.380 say, yeah,

01:07:03.780 that's probably

01:07:04.200 true.

01:07:04.840 And just

01:07:05.300 describe some

01:07:06.000 of the other

01:07:06.380 worlds such

01:07:07.040 as how did

01:07:07.820 the Russia

01:07:08.200 collusion

01:07:08.700 hoax?

01:07:09.860 So could

01:07:10.340 you imagine

01:07:10.900 Trump running

01:07:12.620 through each

01:07:13.200 of the hoaxes

01:07:14.020 including, and

01:07:15.540 this would make

01:07:16.020 you happy,

01:07:17.880 pandemic-related

01:07:18.920 hoaxes or

01:07:20.580 bad behavior,

01:07:21.540 let's say.

01:07:22.940 Imagine him

01:07:23.660 laying out all

01:07:24.420 of the parts

01:07:24.980 and saying,

01:07:25.540 and why did

01:07:26.000 this happen?

01:07:27.160 Well, follow

01:07:27.980 the money.

01:07:28.400 Here's how

01:07:29.860 this happened.

01:07:30.620 Why did

01:07:31.080 this happen?

01:07:32.460 Follow the

01:07:33.000 money.

01:07:33.980 You can see

01:07:34.480 the gears of

01:07:35.060 the machine.

01:07:36.080 So imagine

01:07:36.580 him, it

01:07:37.260 doesn't have

01:07:37.700 to be Trump,

01:07:38.600 but imagine

01:07:39.120 somebody just

01:07:39.740 laying out

01:07:40.700 how everything

01:07:42.160 works.

01:07:43.300 Because remember

01:07:44.060 Dave Chappelle

01:07:44.740 actually gave

01:07:45.540 him credit

01:07:46.000 once for

01:07:46.700 doing exactly

01:07:47.440 that.

01:07:48.540 When Trump

01:07:49.260 said the

01:07:49.840 system is

01:07:50.360 rigged, and

01:07:50.900 the reason he

01:07:51.420 knows, you

01:07:51.960 know, the

01:07:52.200 whole political

01:07:52.720 system is

01:07:53.280 rigged, and

01:07:54.040 the reason he

01:07:54.460 knows is that

01:07:55.040 he's part of

01:07:55.480 the rigging.

01:07:56.700 As a citizen,

01:07:58.400 he was

01:07:58.940 donating to

01:07:59.580 things and

01:08:00.180 using the

01:08:00.780 system.

01:08:01.740 So even

01:08:02.220 Chappelle

01:08:03.100 said, you

01:08:04.900 know, at

01:08:05.820 least he

01:08:06.140 told you

01:08:06.480 honestly.

01:08:08.540 That's worth

01:08:09.180 something.

01:08:09.920 He actually

01:08:10.440 told you to

01:08:11.140 your face

01:08:11.740 how the

01:08:12.780 system works.

01:08:14.380 I wouldn't

01:08:14.780 mind seeing a

01:08:15.380 little more

01:08:15.700 of that,

01:08:16.160 would you?

01:08:17.320 A little

01:08:17.660 more of that,

01:08:18.240 please?

01:08:19.480 Yeah, but

01:08:20.040 he's got to

01:08:20.420 find, I

01:08:20.880 think he

01:08:21.140 probably has

01:08:22.460 to find

01:08:23.000 election

01:08:23.620 rigging.

01:08:25.260 He has to

01:08:25.760 kind of prove

01:08:26.280 it.

01:08:26.460 Now, correct

01:08:27.920 me if I'm

01:08:28.340 wrong.

01:08:31.560 Isn't

01:08:31.940 Trump, didn't

01:08:32.740 he say

01:08:33.140 someday soon

01:08:35.400 he's going

01:08:35.840 to do a

01:08:36.320 big election

01:08:38.600 speech?

01:08:41.580 On Monday,

01:08:42.200 right?

01:08:42.820 So on

01:08:43.420 Monday, he's

01:08:44.360 going to

01:08:44.720 present, I

01:08:45.840 guess, the

01:08:46.160 information.

01:08:47.000 Now, do

01:08:47.440 you expect

01:08:48.000 that the

01:08:48.400 information he

01:08:49.080 presents is

01:08:50.800 going to hold

01:08:51.400 up to

01:08:52.880 scrutiny?

01:08:53.260 Because I

01:08:56.080 imagine it's

01:08:56.680 more than

01:08:57.060 one claim,

01:08:57.860 right?

01:08:58.380 I assume

01:08:58.900 he's going

01:08:59.220 to give

01:08:59.440 you several

01:08:59.940 claims.

01:09:01.280 If he

01:09:01.820 gave you

01:09:02.200 one claim,

01:09:04.060 like one

01:09:04.700 really good

01:09:05.440 claim, I

01:09:07.160 would say

01:09:07.500 his odds

01:09:08.120 of being

01:09:08.460 right are

01:09:08.920 much higher

01:09:09.540 than if he

01:09:10.600 gives you

01:09:10.920 five.

01:09:12.100 If he

01:09:12.640 gives you

01:09:12.960 five, it's

01:09:13.720 going to

01:09:13.920 look like

01:09:14.320 laundry list

01:09:14.980 persuasion,

01:09:16.280 as in,

01:09:16.740 well, none

01:09:17.300 of these

01:09:17.640 are proven,

01:09:18.560 but look

01:09:18.860 how many

01:09:19.220 there are.

01:09:19.920 Where

01:09:20.260 there's

01:09:20.520 smoke,

01:09:20.900 there must

01:09:21.200 be fire,

01:09:21.800 sort of

01:09:22.020 thing.

01:09:22.320 That would

01:09:22.700 be persuasion.

01:09:24.500 If he

01:09:25.000 gives you

01:09:25.360 one, you 0.71

01:09:26.920 might have

01:09:27.300 the goods.

01:09:28.780 So that's

01:09:29.400 the first

01:09:29.740 thing you

01:09:30.020 look for.

01:09:30.860 Look for

01:09:31.320 the one

01:09:31.880 that just

01:09:33.000 wins the

01:09:34.380 day, because

01:09:35.380 maybe there

01:09:35.860 is one, who

01:09:36.420 knows, I

01:09:36.840 don't know.

01:09:39.320 If he

01:09:39.860 gives you

01:09:40.260 the one

01:09:40.780 that's really

01:09:41.340 strong, and

01:09:42.920 then can't

01:09:43.660 help himself,

01:09:44.380 and he's

01:09:44.600 got to

01:09:44.840 mention all

01:09:45.260 the other

01:09:45.560 ones that

01:09:45.940 are not as

01:09:46.380 strong,

01:09:47.660 that's a

01:09:48.360 waste of

01:09:48.720 time.

01:09:49.880 That's just

01:09:50.320 going to,

01:09:50.720 all that will

01:09:51.400 happen is,

01:09:52.020 the news

01:09:52.520 will debunk

01:09:53.200 the weak

01:09:53.740 ones, they

01:09:54.960 will ignore

01:09:55.560 the strong

01:09:56.120 one, am

01:09:56.740 I right?

01:09:57.820 You all

01:09:58.180 know it.

01:09:58.960 They will

01:09:59.420 ignore the

01:10:00.280 strong one,

01:10:01.320 they'll debunk

01:10:02.140 the weak

01:10:02.580 ones, and

01:10:03.140 they'll tell

01:10:03.500 you that

01:10:03.840 they're done,

01:10:04.880 and they're

01:10:05.180 all debunked.

01:10:06.240 Right?

01:10:07.160 Now, Trump

01:10:08.080 could also

01:10:08.520 explain that,

01:10:09.260 because that's

01:10:09.600 how the

01:10:09.900 gears of the

01:10:10.460 machine work.

01:10:12.000 Imagine you

01:10:12.640 giving the

01:10:13.100 speech and

01:10:13.760 saying,

01:10:14.400 all right,

01:10:14.620 now here's

01:10:15.080 how the

01:10:15.820 gears of the

01:10:16.360 machine work.

01:10:17.460 I've given

01:10:18.100 you five

01:10:18.680 examples.

01:10:19.180 one of

01:10:20.100 them, I

01:10:20.400 believe, is

01:10:20.900 really solid.

01:10:22.180 Watch the

01:10:22.640 news coverage

01:10:23.280 tomorrow.

01:10:23.960 They're only

01:10:24.360 going to talk

01:10:24.820 about the

01:10:25.180 other ones,

01:10:25.780 which even

01:10:26.380 I tell you

01:10:26.960 need more

01:10:27.540 investigation.

01:10:28.820 These are not

01:10:29.480 guaranteed, these

01:10:30.220 are just red

01:10:30.720 flags.

01:10:31.700 But watch how

01:10:32.300 they treat the

01:10:32.820 red flags as

01:10:34.120 the one they

01:10:34.520 debunk, if

01:10:35.660 they can, and

01:10:36.800 they ignore my

01:10:37.460 strong one.

01:10:38.880 Now, he won't

01:10:39.480 do that, but

01:10:40.160 you can imagine

01:10:41.380 he could.

01:10:41.720 All right,

01:10:44.020 well, that's

01:10:44.620 going to be

01:10:45.620 must-watch TV.

01:10:47.440 Do you think

01:10:48.120 there's anything

01:10:48.620 that would stop

01:10:49.280 you from watching

01:10:50.080 Trump try to

01:10:51.400 pull off the

01:10:51.880 third act?

01:10:52.780 Because that's

01:10:53.420 the third act.

01:10:54.900 If he pulls

01:10:55.760 it off, that's

01:10:57.300 the third act.

01:10:59.720 I wouldn't put

01:11:00.540 a big bet on

01:11:01.180 it, because I

01:11:03.220 don't know if

01:11:03.660 it'll be as

01:11:04.080 clean as he

01:11:04.820 gives a speech

01:11:05.440 and that's his

01:11:06.120 third act and

01:11:06.820 everything changes.

01:11:07.640 I doubt that,

01:11:08.640 because the

01:11:09.020 media will just

01:11:09.860 try to eviscerate

01:11:11.120 him no matter

01:11:11.540 what he says.

01:11:12.680 But it could

01:11:13.300 be that maybe

01:11:15.000 he starts a

01:11:16.000 spark of

01:11:16.480 something that

01:11:17.820 maybe somebody

01:11:19.020 later can prove

01:11:20.280 is real.

01:11:21.840 We'll see.

01:11:22.820 I wouldn't

01:11:23.200 expect any

01:11:23.820 major change

01:11:24.660 on Monday,

01:11:25.300 but I'm so

01:11:27.580 interested.

01:11:28.840 What is it

01:11:29.540 that after all

01:11:30.320 of these fake

01:11:31.240 claims, fake

01:11:32.900 meaning unproven,

01:11:34.960 after all the

01:11:36.000 times that he

01:11:37.080 got his hopes

01:11:37.700 up, do you

01:11:38.960 think that this

01:11:39.740 is the time of

01:11:40.760 all times,

01:11:41.540 is this the

01:11:42.620 time he

01:11:43.780 would come

01:11:44.200 forth with,

01:11:44.980 okay, we've

01:11:45.700 finally got the

01:11:46.300 goods, this

01:11:47.180 would be the

01:11:47.580 time, unless

01:11:48.940 he really had

01:11:49.640 it?

01:11:51.000 I mean, it

01:11:51.360 would be a

01:11:51.960 hell of a

01:11:53.420 gutsy play if

01:11:55.340 he didn't have

01:11:55.960 the goods.

01:11:57.720 But, you know,

01:11:58.500 it's possible he

01:11:59.120 could think he

01:11:59.680 has them and

01:12:00.420 doesn't, you

01:12:01.140 know, you

01:12:02.040 never know.

01:12:02.440 yeah, all

01:12:07.440 right, so

01:12:08.540 YouTube, their

01:12:10.000 new rules are

01:12:11.920 that they can

01:12:12.600 ban you for

01:12:13.960 content that

01:12:14.740 disagrees with

01:12:15.640 the World

01:12:16.000 Health Organization

01:12:16.920 or local

01:12:18.060 health officials

01:12:18.840 like the CDC.

01:12:21.180 Michael

01:12:21.560 Schellenberger is

01:12:22.700 pointing out

01:12:23.560 that it will

01:12:25.020 censor you if

01:12:25.840 you disagree with

01:12:26.800 the World

01:12:27.140 Health Organization.

01:12:28.040 think about

01:12:30.880 that.

01:12:31.920 Do you realize

01:12:32.760 that I would

01:12:33.380 have been

01:12:33.640 censored?

01:12:34.760 So when the

01:12:35.540 World Health

01:12:35.980 Organization first

01:12:37.000 said some

01:12:38.880 stuff about

01:12:39.460 masks and I

01:12:40.400 tried to

01:12:41.120 debunk them,

01:12:42.420 I would have

01:12:43.280 been banned

01:12:43.680 on YouTube.

01:12:46.880 Amazing.

01:12:48.380 All right.

01:12:50.300 But then

01:12:51.080 Michael

01:12:52.380 Schellenberger

01:12:52.820 says YouTube

01:12:53.360 isn't a social

01:12:54.340 media platform,

01:12:55.160 it's a propaganda

01:12:55.760 platform, and I

01:12:56.660 said to myself,

01:12:57.320 huh, I kind

01:12:58.840 of like that

01:12:59.220 framing.

01:13:00.820 Because by my

01:13:01.960 count, your

01:13:03.640 count might be

01:13:04.860 different, but by

01:13:06.400 my count, there's

01:13:07.180 only one social

01:13:09.160 media platform, and

01:13:11.000 the rest are

01:13:11.540 propaganda platforms.

01:13:13.020 They're advertising

01:13:13.720 and propaganda.

01:13:15.520 But there's one

01:13:16.180 that's actually

01:13:16.660 social media,

01:13:17.520 that's X.

01:13:19.160 Yeah.

01:13:19.640 X is at least

01:13:21.080 trying to be a

01:13:23.140 social media

01:13:23.660 platform.

01:13:24.580 The other ones

01:13:25.140 are just,

01:13:25.620 essentially

01:13:27.760 propaganda

01:13:28.460 platforms that

01:13:29.640 suck money 0.68

01:13:30.140 out of your

01:13:30.480 pockets

01:13:30.900 and sell

01:13:34.400 to advertisers.

01:13:38.080 All right.

01:13:41.520 Yeah, you don't

01:13:42.300 tweet anymore, you

01:13:43.100 X claim,

01:13:44.560 or you post.

01:13:45.680 Post is the most

01:13:46.560 boring word for it,

01:13:47.520 but I guess that's

01:13:48.160 what we're going

01:13:48.640 with.

01:13:49.580 All right, ladies 1.00

01:13:50.160 and gentlemen,

01:13:51.820 more to Elon

01:13:55.240 Musk's point, if

01:13:57.780 you looked at me a

01:13:58.860 year ago and you

01:13:59.760 said, how do you

01:14:00.260 prepare for this

01:14:01.020 live stream, I

01:14:01.780 would say, I read

01:14:03.140 the news.

01:14:04.800 And I collect the

01:14:06.080 news, and then I

01:14:07.540 talk about it with

01:14:08.600 my own opinions.

01:14:09.980 But lately, I've

01:14:11.180 realized that I've

01:14:11.860 done the show

01:14:12.360 without ever

01:14:13.000 checking the news.

01:14:15.040 Because I check

01:14:15.960 social media, which

01:14:17.340 picks out pieces

01:14:18.440 from the news, and

01:14:19.300 often refers to

01:14:20.200 the actual news

01:14:21.500 source.

01:14:22.440 But that's the

01:14:23.960 only way this

01:14:24.580 seems to make

01:14:25.120 sense.

01:14:25.800 Do you know

01:14:26.080 why?

01:14:26.860 If you go to

01:14:27.720 CNN and you

01:14:28.500 see a story, you're

01:14:30.260 going to see the

01:14:30.780 CNN spin of the

01:14:31.780 story.

01:14:32.700 Is that useful?

01:14:34.120 It's worse than

01:14:35.540 negative.

01:14:36.980 It's worse than

01:14:37.880 nothing.

01:14:39.260 It would be

01:14:39.880 better if you'd

01:14:40.400 never seen it.

01:14:41.620 Because it's a

01:14:42.740 spin.

01:14:43.660 It's opposite of

01:14:44.780 news.

01:14:45.560 It's, you know,

01:14:46.740 it's a sort of

01:14:48.260 managed news.

01:14:49.960 If you go to

01:14:50.880 Fox News, are

01:14:52.660 you ever going to

01:14:53.160 see them agreeing

01:14:53.880 with CNN?

01:14:54.700 No.

01:14:55.320 You know, they

01:14:55.700 have their own

01:14:56.360 spin on things.

01:14:58.900 So if you see

01:14:59.980 either news, you've

01:15:02.280 got to go to both

01:15:03.000 sources and make

01:15:04.320 sure you've cross

01:15:05.040 checked your work,

01:15:05.880 which I do all the

01:15:06.920 time.

01:15:07.160 I show you that.

01:15:08.300 I like to see

01:15:09.420 something's true on

01:15:10.260 both platforms before

01:15:11.500 I'm sure it's true.

01:15:12.920 If only one

01:15:13.720 platform says it's

01:15:14.600 true, well, I

01:15:15.560 don't know, probably

01:15:16.480 not, maybe.

01:15:18.260 However, I've

01:15:22.680 noticed lately I

01:15:23.620 can spend all of

01:15:24.500 my time on

01:15:25.140 Twitter, because if

01:15:26.580 there's a story that

01:15:27.480 makes my hair on

01:15:28.320 fire, like, ah, did

01:15:29.680 somebody really do

01:15:30.400 or say that, there'll

01:15:31.780 be a community

01:15:32.480 note, or there'll

01:15:34.100 be another human

01:15:35.460 saying, no, this is

01:15:36.740 out of context, you

01:15:38.320 know, this is what

01:15:39.120 they left out, here's

01:15:40.060 a link to the

01:15:40.640 opposite story.

01:15:41.800 So when I read

01:15:42.720 Twitter, I get the

01:15:45.120 news from both

01:15:45.840 directions.

01:15:46.320 When I read any

01:15:47.680 platform, other

01:15:49.040 so-called news

01:15:50.560 platforms, I have to

01:15:51.820 go to at least two

01:15:52.780 sources, so I've seen

01:15:53.840 both sides.

01:15:55.260 But Twitter has it

01:15:56.180 there automatically.

01:15:58.000 You know, you can

01:15:58.780 always count on the

01:15:59.480 trolls to come in and

01:16:01.540 give you as much

01:16:02.160 trouble as possible.

01:16:03.220 The trolls actually are

01:16:04.240 kind of useful, because

01:16:05.580 even when they don't

01:16:06.260 say, you know, factual

01:16:07.860 arguments, they give you

01:16:09.740 a sense of how people

01:16:10.740 are feeling.

01:16:12.200 They give you a sense

01:16:13.160 of basically how

01:16:15.060 brainwashed they are.

01:16:16.240 When you see the

01:16:17.020 trolls, let's say the

01:16:18.840 trolls who are not

01:16:19.560 just saying a bad

01:16:20.480 thing, they're trying

01:16:21.600 to argue the

01:16:22.420 politics, you should

01:16:24.780 feel sorry for them

01:16:25.680 because the trolls

01:16:26.360 are the most

01:16:26.940 hypnotized, brainwashed

01:16:28.720 people.

01:16:30.120 They're not coming

01:16:30.960 at you with their

01:16:31.580 better arguments.

01:16:32.900 They're coming up

01:16:33.580 with, you know, TDS.

01:16:36.680 So you can see the

01:16:37.500 effects of brainwashing

01:16:38.740 best on the trolls.

01:16:40.680 So you don't want to

01:16:41.640 get rid of the trolls.

01:16:42.400 They're like this

01:16:43.180 little indicator of

01:16:44.700 how bad the

01:16:45.220 brainwashing is,

01:16:46.180 because the more

01:16:46.820 brainwashing, more 0.92

01:16:48.360 trolls.

01:16:50.480 All right.

01:16:53.460 The trolls are the

01:16:54.520 ones who say, it

01:16:55.560 was an insurrection.

01:16:58.180 Yeah.

01:16:58.840 So if you didn't

01:16:59.740 know from the

01:17:00.680 trolls that they

01:17:01.480 actually believed

01:17:02.200 there was an

01:17:02.660 insurrection on

01:17:03.400 January 6th, or an

01:17:04.760 attempted one, you

01:17:07.300 would not necessarily

01:17:08.240 think that's even a

01:17:09.180 thing.

01:17:10.220 Like, your brain

01:17:11.200 would say, well,

01:17:11.700 nobody's going to

01:17:12.260 believe that

01:17:13.760 Republicans do an

01:17:15.380 insurrection without

01:17:16.140 weapons.

01:17:17.700 And then what, have

01:17:18.640 you gone down the

01:17:19.460 January 6th well?

01:17:23.560 So each of the

01:17:24.480 arguments that are

01:17:25.340 fake, fake narrative

01:17:26.920 arguments, they all

01:17:28.360 have what I call the

01:17:29.120 well.

01:17:30.320 So it goes like this.

01:17:31.480 Let's see if I can

01:17:32.060 roughly do it without

01:17:32.940 preparing.

01:17:34.840 January 6th was an

01:17:36.660 armed insurrection.

01:17:37.720 And then I come in and

01:17:39.800 say, there's no such

01:17:41.380 thing as Republicans

01:17:42.780 doing an armed

01:17:43.720 insurrection without

01:17:44.780 firearms.

01:17:47.200 But it was violent.

01:17:49.220 All right, so you're

01:17:49.640 going down the well.

01:17:50.380 All right, all right,

01:17:51.300 so yeah, they didn't

01:17:52.140 all have weapons.

01:17:53.380 But a lot of people

01:17:54.260 had weapons.

01:17:56.100 Okay, but nobody

01:17:57.000 actually brandished a

01:17:58.300 gun, right?

01:18:00.020 But they had guns.

01:18:01.160 All those guns were

01:18:01.940 taken away from them.

01:18:02.620 They had guns.

01:18:03.220 They had bear spray.

01:18:04.360 They beat people with

01:18:05.120 objects.

01:18:06.460 Right, right, right.

01:18:07.660 But what percentage of

01:18:08.780 those people were

01:18:09.480 involved in that?

01:18:11.080 Well, there's a lot of

01:18:12.080 violence.

01:18:12.440 There's a lot of

01:18:13.000 violence.

01:18:13.640 Here's all the

01:18:14.360 examples.

01:18:15.140 I know, I know.

01:18:16.240 But with all the

01:18:18.220 people there, what

01:18:19.940 percentage of them

01:18:20.860 were actually doing

01:18:22.000 something violent?

01:18:23.220 Oh, people got

01:18:24.380 killed.

01:18:25.200 Right, right, right.

01:18:26.740 Ashley Babbitt got

01:18:27.700 killed.

01:18:29.260 And some of the

01:18:29.940 police officers died

01:18:31.180 soon after, and

01:18:32.200 that's very tragic.

01:18:33.380 And may have been

01:18:34.040 in large part

01:18:35.320 because of it.

01:18:37.400 Tragic.

01:18:40.140 So you can just

01:18:41.120 keep going down

01:18:41.680 the well, but

01:18:44.680 ultimately they have

01:18:45.840 to believe that

01:18:47.320 Republicans tried to

01:18:48.820 conquer the country

01:18:49.940 by trespassing in

01:18:52.360 a building.

01:18:54.740 You take the trolls

01:18:56.380 all the way down to,

01:18:57.380 but ultimately what

01:18:58.740 you believe is that

01:19:00.800 weapons or not,

01:19:02.620 violence or not,

01:19:04.040 that the plan for

01:19:05.660 conquering the

01:19:06.360 country was to

01:19:07.820 wander around in

01:19:08.740 the building.

01:19:10.640 What do they say

01:19:11.800 after you get to

01:19:12.660 the bottom of the

01:19:13.200 well and say,

01:19:14.260 but explain, explain

01:19:15.900 how the rest of

01:19:16.640 their plan went.

01:19:17.780 So you trespass,

01:19:19.760 and then you get

01:19:20.880 the nuclear codes,

01:19:23.240 and who delivers

01:19:24.540 them?

01:19:25.140 Does the guy who

01:19:26.020 carries the football

01:19:26.860 actually knock on

01:19:28.660 the door and say,

01:19:29.600 it looks like we

01:19:30.300 have new leadership,

01:19:31.180 you trespassers,

01:19:32.800 which one of you?

01:19:34.000 A guy with the

01:19:34.680 bison hat, I got

01:19:35.940 the nuclear, can

01:19:37.300 you connect the

01:19:37.920 dots?

01:19:39.240 Just tell me how

01:19:40.540 the plan was going

01:19:41.620 to work its way

01:19:42.660 out.

01:19:43.420 When you get to the

01:19:44.320 bottom of the well

01:19:45.000 and you get to that

01:19:46.060 point, what does the

01:19:48.000 troll say?

01:19:48.960 Remember, they're

01:19:49.540 deeply hypnotized.

01:19:51.180 These are not people

01:19:52.020 operating under

01:19:52.840 reason.

01:19:53.420 They are literally,

01:19:54.860 and I'm not saying

01:19:55.960 this for political

01:19:57.180 points or anything,

01:19:58.920 they are actually

01:19:59.580 brainwashed,

01:20:00.800 actually literally

01:20:01.580 brainwashed.

01:20:02.740 What do they do?

01:20:06.440 Well, in my

01:20:07.560 experience, they say

01:20:08.500 something like,

01:20:10.200 well, why'd your

01:20:11.060 wife leave you? 1.00

01:20:13.340 That's what I get.

01:20:16.780 Or I get, why is

01:20:18.060 your stepson dead?

01:20:20.600 That's what I get.

01:20:23.500 Yeah, when you get

01:20:24.540 to the bottom of the

01:20:25.200 well, it's pretty

01:20:25.780 dark down there.

01:20:26.480 So if you don't

01:20:28.940 have the stones to

01:20:30.540 go to the bottom

01:20:31.080 of the well five

01:20:32.260 times a day, you

01:20:32.940 need to stay off

01:20:33.660 Twitter.

01:20:34.760 Spend a lot of time

01:20:35.540 in the bottom of

01:20:36.060 the well.

01:20:37.380 All right.

01:20:38.720 That's all I got

01:20:39.320 for today.

01:20:39.880 Thanks for watching

01:20:40.600 YouTube.

01:20:41.180 It's the best show

01:20:41.740 you've ever seen or

01:20:42.500 ever will see you

01:20:43.160 until tomorrow.

01:20:44.700 Bye.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - August 16, 2023

Episode 2202 Scott Adams： Wild Day In News & Opinion And I'm Here To Show You The Machinery. Coffee!

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript