Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2234 Scott Adams： All Of The News Turned Funny Lately. Come Enjoy It

00:00:00.000 Ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-da-da. 0.95

00:00:05.560 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.

00:00:11.120 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and I don't think there's better, nicer, better, sexier time than this.

00:00:19.840 But amazingly, you could take it to another level.

00:00:22.940 Yeah, yeah, there's another level after this.

00:00:24.900 And all you need to reach that extra level is a cupper, a mug, or a glass, a tank of Chelsea's dine, a canteen, jug, or flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:32.860 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:34.060 I like coffee.

00:00:35.980 Join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day, the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:41.740 It's called the simultaneous sip.

00:00:44.480 Go.

00:00:44.700 Well, there was a gentleman with a Ukrainian flag in his bio who wanted to mock me by saying,

00:00:59.820 Scott, so Scott, what happened to Dilbert?

00:01:04.860 So what happened to Dilbert?

00:01:06.440 Huh?

00:01:10.000 Totally got me.

00:01:10.980 Well, for those of you who don't know, Dilbert does run by subscription, both on the X platform, hit the subscribe button,

00:01:19.900 or on the locals platform if you want your politics and your comics as well.

00:01:25.320 But I want to read you today's comic, because apparently this was missed by the Ukrainian flag gentleman.

00:01:31.920 And you can see that it starts with Dilbert just talking to, Dilbert's just talking to his boss there.

00:01:40.460 And he just says, the boss says, Dilbert, I'm transferring you to our chemtrails secret project.

00:01:48.080 And Dilbert says, chemtrails are real?

00:01:51.480 And the boss says, all conspiracy theories are real.

00:01:54.380 And Dilbert says, what?

00:01:55.380 And then Dilbert follows the boss down the hallway, because he's wondering what's going on.

00:02:01.420 And he says, was the moon landing faked?

00:02:04.900 And the boss says, let me answer that, answer your question with a question.

00:02:09.020 He opens the door.

00:02:10.780 He shows a scene of a lunar landing.

00:02:13.120 He says, ever wonder why we have a conference room that looks like a lunar landscape?

00:02:17.040 And Dilbert says, stop it.

00:02:21.860 My head is going to explode.

00:02:25.120 And the final panel, the boss is looking at his phone. 1.00

00:02:29.560 He says, Michelle Obama keeps sending me dick pics. 1.00

00:02:34.060 And his head explodes. 1.00

00:02:36.860 So that's what you're missing.

00:02:39.180 Now, the question you might ask yourself is, would that have run in newspapers?

00:02:44.420 Scott, if you were still in newspapers, would they have said, that looks good?

00:02:49.860 We'll run that comic?

00:02:52.300 Probably not.

00:02:53.600 Probably not.

00:02:54.580 So that's what you're missing, Mr. Ukrainian flag.

00:02:57.940 If you'd like to know where it went, it improved.

00:03:02.880 That's why I charge for it.

00:03:05.720 If I still wrote the crappy comic you saw in the newspaper, it would be free.

00:03:10.400 But if you want the good stuff, anyway.

00:03:14.420 Here's the news.

00:03:16.000 China has developed a tractor beam where they can move things at a distance, especially in space.

00:03:25.040 They actually built a tractor beam.

00:03:27.540 They don't call it that.

00:03:28.620 They call it something else.

00:03:30.100 But some kind of plasma magnetic thing where they could potentially move a satellite around in space.

00:03:37.280 Now, apparently it only works from like a mile away, but it could work from further, especially if it's in space.

00:03:48.080 So are you worried about the Chinese tractor beam?

00:03:51.500 I would say it's a little bit too early to worry about the tractor beam.

00:03:56.900 But wouldn't it be great if both sides had a tractor beam and you went to war?

00:04:02.140 And you'd be like...

00:04:03.400 And you'd take your gun and all of a sudden...

00:04:06.300 It'd fly out of your hands up to space. 1.00

00:04:08.860 You're like, damn it, damn it. 1.00

00:04:10.320 You'd grab your hand grenade. 1.00

00:04:12.380 You'd throw your hand grenade.

00:04:13.840 It gets about halfway there and then it goes...

00:04:15.720 Up into space.

00:04:17.760 Yeah, the tractor beam would make all wars more fun.

00:04:22.560 You'd just be like shooting at people and your bullets would go...

00:04:26.020 Right up to space. 0.92

00:04:28.260 Everybody would live.

00:04:29.720 You could have an entire war where there are no injuries.

00:04:32.780 All your weapons would just go up into space.

00:04:35.040 The tractor beam would get them.

00:04:36.720 Because I don't think it works on people.

00:04:38.100 It only works on magnetic things.

00:04:41.300 So you'd probably have to fight with clubs and fire and stuff.

00:04:47.880 But that'd be fun.

00:04:49.620 All right, my theme for today is...

00:04:53.840 Let me explain how humor works.

00:04:56.240 And how it applies to the news.

00:04:58.640 If I'm going to write a joke about a real thing in life that you've all experienced...

00:05:04.120 If the only thing I do is describe it exactly as it really is...

00:05:09.140 It's not very funny.

00:05:10.280 It's just a description.

00:05:12.860 But if you exaggerate a little bit...

00:05:16.240 Well, it's still not really funny.

00:05:17.800 It's just an exaggeration.

00:05:19.280 But if you exaggerate more until it's like really crazy...

00:05:24.560 Almost.

00:05:25.700 You're almost there.

00:05:26.620 It's not quite humor.

00:05:28.020 But you're almost there.

00:05:29.600 If you really, really exaggerate it... 1.00

00:05:32.280 So it's so ridiculous your brain just has a... 1.00

00:05:35.160 Has like a hiccup when it looks at it because it's so stupid. 1.00

00:05:38.540 That's a joke. 0.99

00:05:40.280 The news, by its natural just existence and the way it's designed, has now progressed from...

00:05:48.720 Oh, that's an unusual news story.

00:05:51.200 That seems slightly heightened.

00:05:53.720 A little bit exaggerated from what I was expecting.

00:05:56.520 A little bit more than I expected.

00:05:59.220 And then it went to...

00:06:00.700 Whoa.

00:06:01.840 That's certainly surprising.

00:06:03.340 But wow.

00:06:04.440 Wow.

00:06:04.740 I guess that really happened.

00:06:05.740 I guess that really happened.

00:06:05.820 That's surprising.

00:06:07.380 And then it went to...

00:06:09.220 Did that really happen?

00:06:11.360 I feel like maybe that didn't really happen.

00:06:15.120 But you're not quite laughing yet.

00:06:17.760 You're just confused.

00:06:19.220 It's like, really?

00:06:21.100 Really?

00:06:21.560 Did the president actually said drink bleach?

00:06:24.900 Really?

00:06:25.240 And you're wondering, like, what's going on here?

00:06:28.480 You're just sort of confused.

00:06:30.400 But if you just wait, if you would just be patient for a while, people, people, if you

00:06:36.180 would just be patient, the news would accommodate you by going so far into absurdity that you

00:06:43.360 could no longer miss that it was all a joke.

00:06:46.480 We're there.

00:06:48.200 We're there.

00:06:49.480 All the news is just absurd now.

00:06:52.000 It's all funny.

00:06:54.080 Like, it could be tragic at the same time.

00:06:56.360 Don't get me wrong.

00:06:57.620 Real people are dying.

00:06:59.300 Real people are suffering. 0.94

00:07:01.140 But that was happening anyway.

00:07:03.640 The way the news covers it doesn't make it better or worse.

00:07:07.380 But I'll tell you one thing.

00:07:09.740 If things are going to be bad, we might as well have a good laugh about it.

00:07:12.760 And today, we can say, I'm calling it.

00:07:16.100 But there's no difference between the news and humor.

00:07:20.080 No difference.

00:07:21.540 You don't believe me?

00:07:23.620 Well, let's look at some stories.

00:07:26.660 Let's see.

00:07:27.700 Who did the Democrats put up for their best, the best Democrats that we have?

00:07:34.840 Well, there's one that's decomposing before he's dead.

00:07:39.800 Yeah, he's actually decomposing now.

00:07:42.660 A lot of people will wait.

00:07:43.840 He's also got the rigor mortis.

00:07:46.240 It started already.

00:07:47.940 Have you ever seen Biden walk?

00:07:50.420 Yeah, he's got the rigor mortis walk.

00:07:52.880 If you haven't seen it, it looks like this.

00:07:56.060 Let me show you a normal walk.

00:08:00.040 You want to see that again?

00:08:01.260 Normal walk.

00:08:02.000 And now the rigor mortis walk.

00:08:09.780 See?

00:08:10.460 See, those are different.

00:08:11.960 Normal walk.

00:08:14.220 Rigor mortis already set again.

00:08:18.000 Like that.

00:08:18.900 Yeah.

00:08:19.040 So the Democrats, knowing that the future of the planet depends on the leader of the United States to a large degree because of nuclear weapons and size of the economy, etc.

00:08:33.940 So they decided that the way to protect humanity was to put forward as their champion somebody who started decomposing before he actually is technically dead.

00:08:46.180 Now, does that sound like actual news?

00:08:51.880 Or does that sound like a joke?

00:08:55.000 It sounds like a joke, doesn't it?

00:08:56.700 If you were to turn on idiocracy or some movie that is clearly meant to be a joke, would this be beyond that level of absurdity?

00:09:06.960 No, it would not.

00:09:08.520 It would not be below the level of absurdity that we routinely consider humorous exaggeration.

00:09:16.860 But at least we have a capable vice president to back up Biden.

00:09:21.560 Oh.

00:09:22.700 No.

00:09:23.240 We actually have the only vice president that nobody would want to even entertain at a child's birthday party because they feel it would embarrass them.

00:09:35.520 Is that too far?

00:09:37.900 No.

00:09:38.680 Kamala Harris looks like she would be embarrassing in every situation. 1.00

00:09:43.580 She's had no successes and she's probably drunk.

00:09:48.240 I don't know that, so I can't say that for sure.

00:09:51.100 I can say for sure that she acts like somebody who's drunk in public or inebriated in some fashion.

00:10:00.360 Yeah.

00:10:00.720 So we have somebody who, whether or not she is or not, seems indistinguishable from a sloppy drunk

00:10:07.820 and somebody who's indistinguishable from somebody who's been dead for six days.

00:10:13.720 Basically the same.

00:10:14.820 And that's who the Democrats are running to protect the world.

00:10:20.540 But at least the Republicans are doing a serious job, right?

00:10:24.700 So we've got the only, the oldest Republican we could find.

00:10:29.500 And the only one who's been impeached three times and half of the country thinks he's Hiller.

00:10:35.260 So that's what the Republicans have decided.

00:10:38.640 That's our champion.

00:10:39.500 But at least the Republicans are playing it for the right purpose.

00:10:45.500 A lot of people were like, hey, let's get a president who's got good policies and stuff.

00:10:51.420 I think Trump actually has good policies.

00:10:53.880 But that's not really why he has so much support at the moment.

00:10:58.500 Let me just say it.

00:11:00.240 It's about revenge.

00:11:02.780 It's about revenge.

00:11:04.100 Trump says it directly, and it's exactly what you're thinking.

00:11:09.300 If you're a Trump supporter, you are thinking revenge because you feel you've been abused badly for years.

00:11:15.560 It's payback.

00:11:16.680 Yeah.

00:11:17.420 And the fact that you don't have to hide it is hilarious.

00:11:24.220 Just think of the absurdity that we can say out loud that you support a candidate for revenge

00:11:31.860 and that you can say that non-ironically, non-exaggeratingly.

00:11:38.240 It's just a fact.

00:11:39.880 It's a revenge vote.

00:11:42.680 Boy, do I want revenge.

00:11:44.980 Oh, my God, do I want revenge.

00:11:48.720 I'd love to tell you I don't.

00:11:50.800 You know, I'd love to tell you I'm so far above that.

00:11:54.620 Oh, my God.

00:11:56.000 No, no.

00:11:57.600 We don't want any revenge.

00:11:58.660 But you're dealing with seriously broken and bad people who are in charge of things.

00:12:05.380 And I'm not sure I would call it revenge as much as I'd call it some form of justice.

00:12:10.960 But if you want to call it revenge, I'm happy with that as well.

00:12:15.520 So that's just the baseline.

00:12:18.040 The baseline is who we've decided to run for president.

00:12:20.600 A pre-dead guy, a drunken woman, or at least one that looks drunk, and the revenge guy.

00:12:31.700 The revenge guy.

00:12:33.520 So that'll be our contest.

00:12:35.700 Does any of this sound like we're a serious country?

00:12:39.340 Does it sound like we're even trying anymore?

00:12:42.180 No, we're not trying.

00:12:44.360 Nobody's trying.

00:12:45.720 It's just all funny now.

00:12:46.940 We can't tell the difference between what makes sense and what is just a joke.

00:12:51.800 Parity and reality have completely merged.

00:12:54.520 There's no difference.

00:12:57.640 All right.

00:13:00.240 I've said this before, but if you're not already acting this way, I really recommend it.

00:13:06.840 When you see the...

00:13:07.980 This is sort of a reframe.

00:13:10.460 It wasn't too long ago.

00:13:11.900 Some troll would come into my mentions on the X platform and say something evil and bad about me,

00:13:19.280 and I'd feel, oh, like I have to reply to this.

00:13:22.280 Like this is a person with an opinion that does not match my own.

00:13:25.840 I must reply.

00:13:27.900 But now, I have good pattern recognition.

00:13:32.460 Or at least I think I do.

00:13:33.540 Everybody thinks they do.

00:13:34.800 Dunning-Kruger.

00:13:35.320 But my pattern recognition has finally created a shortcut.

00:13:41.940 If I see a Ukrainian flag in the bio, you can really ignore everything they say.

00:13:49.520 And I'm not trying to be personal about it.

00:13:52.660 This is a statement about brainwashing.

00:13:54.740 It's not a statement about the individuals.

00:13:57.120 The individuals I see as purely victims,

00:13:59.340 they have no idea that putting the Ukraine flag in their bio is basically telling us they're fascists.

00:14:09.540 Am I wrong?

00:14:10.700 The Ukraine war is largely for corporate interests.

00:14:13.440 We all know that, right?

00:14:14.920 And what do you call it when the government and the corporations collude

00:14:18.740 so that you can't tell the difference between the government and the big corporations?

00:14:22.960 That's fascism by definition.

00:14:26.180 That's specifically what it means.

00:14:27.920 It's not like a general statement about, you know, you guys are bad,

00:14:32.840 so we're using the word that sounds bad.

00:14:34.380 No.

00:14:35.140 It's by definition, specifically, the big corporations and the government operating as one.

00:14:42.640 So that's what Ukraine is.

00:14:44.420 So the people putting their little Ukraine flag on there

00:14:46.820 are coming on to X to call the Republicans who are not so keen on having a war there

00:14:51.620 that they're the fascists.

00:14:54.360 Now, is that funny or what? 0.95

00:14:55.680 It's funny that they're so brainwashed, they don't know that they're the baddies.

00:15:00.760 They actually don't know that they've been brainwashed by the worst people on Earth

00:15:05.580 to imagine that they're the anti-fascists.

00:15:10.460 I mean, that's beyond just politics.

00:15:14.320 That's sort of funny.

00:15:15.580 And what I mean is, when I see their little flag, how do you take anything they say seriously?

00:15:23.000 Because they're operating under a complete brainwashing model.

00:15:27.400 It's just total brainwashing.

00:15:29.360 Now, I would argue also that the ones who put their pronouns there

00:15:32.680 should be discounted for similar reasons, maybe a little different.

00:15:37.160 But anybody with the pronouns there is going to go along with the crowd.

00:15:42.160 Would you agree?

00:15:43.600 Putting your pronouns in your profile says,

00:15:46.380 I support whatever you tell me to support, and I'm going to really support it.

00:15:51.160 Because I don't want anybody to think I don't support what you told me to support.

00:15:54.560 All right, so that's a sign of a weak mind, in my opinion.

00:15:59.480 I don't mind that people have pronoun preferences.

00:16:02.020 That's a different subject.

00:16:04.100 But if you feel you need to put it into your profile,

00:16:07.120 well, you're signaling a whole different thing.

00:16:10.160 I'm happy to use whatever pronoun anybody asks me to.

00:16:13.700 That's my standard for life just in general.

00:16:16.540 What would you like to be called?

00:16:18.140 Okay.

00:16:18.460 But putting it into your profile, that's a sign of something wrong.

00:16:25.160 There's something wrong going on there.

00:16:27.680 All right, so I just use it as a signal that it's somebody who believes the news is still real.

00:16:34.940 Imagine having a Ukraine flag in your profile

00:16:37.980 and also believing that the news, just in general, is actually real.

00:16:47.180 That's not funny to you?

00:16:49.180 It's not funny that people actually believe the news is real.

00:16:53.000 It's kind of funny.

00:16:54.080 It used to be frustrating.

00:16:55.880 Because I'd say, ah, don't you know?

00:16:58.720 How do you not know the news isn't real?

00:17:01.320 But now it's just funny.

00:17:03.660 Like, I see them as victims.

00:17:05.160 We're just, like, spinning their wheels and calling me bad names and stuff.

00:17:12.240 Well, we're going to have to talk about Russell Brand.

00:17:14.200 Would you allow that I can make this story all about me?

00:17:20.960 Because that's what we do.

00:17:26.380 Right?

00:17:26.580 The important thing is that when there's a tragedy or bad news happens to anybody,

00:17:33.140 we need to find a way to make it about ourselves.

00:17:37.140 Because, in fact, that's how we judge everything.

00:17:39.960 You know, as funny as it sounds, it's also the only way people think.

00:17:43.800 The only way we evaluate anything is compared to ourselves.

00:17:48.400 So we're always doing it.

00:17:50.400 Just some people say it out loud.

00:17:52.320 All right, let me make it about myself.

00:17:55.120 I am scheduled to be on Russell Brand's podcast

00:17:58.840 to talk about my new book,

00:18:02.520 Reframe Your Brain,

00:18:03.500 the most powerful book in the country right now.

00:18:05.400 And let's take a vote.

00:18:10.600 So most of you have been watching the news.

00:18:12.260 You've seen the accusations.

00:18:13.520 We'll talk about those.

00:18:15.000 Do you think that that podcast is going to happen?

00:18:18.580 Do you think it's just going to be business as usual

00:18:20.840 and you'll just do the podcast?

00:18:24.520 I don't know.

00:18:27.980 We hope so,

00:18:29.160 but we don't know.

00:18:32.200 Yeah, I don't know.

00:18:33.240 I think it depends what his staff does.

00:18:37.040 I think if the staff that supports him

00:18:39.360 still supports him,

00:18:40.740 then it will happen.

00:18:42.180 And if his staff does not support him,

00:18:44.040 then it won't.

00:18:45.760 But we don't know if they're learning anything

00:18:47.660 they didn't know

00:18:48.360 and if it makes any difference to them.

00:18:51.660 Have I ever told you

00:18:53.000 that the news about public figures

00:18:56.300 completes a sentence?

00:18:58.980 The news about public figures

00:19:01.120 is always

00:19:03.340 it's always false.

00:19:05.560 Yeah.

00:19:05.900 So if you're looking at the

00:19:07.400 Russell Brand story

00:19:08.540 and you're asking yourself

00:19:10.500 how much of this is true?

00:19:13.880 I could give you the answer

00:19:15.180 without knowing anything about it.

00:19:17.860 It's always

00:19:18.640 it's always in the context.

00:19:20.500 Now that doesn't mean

00:19:21.480 that any of the individual anecdotes

00:19:23.440 didn't happen.

00:19:25.100 So I'm

00:19:25.580 if you will allow

00:19:27.460 I'm not going to defend

00:19:29.280 Russell Brand's sex life.

00:19:31.760 Is everybody okay with that?

00:19:33.520 I'm not going to defend

00:19:34.420 Russell Brand's sex life.

00:19:36.240 Like I can't think of anything

00:19:37.340 I would less want to support.

00:19:40.340 That is none of my business.

00:19:42.300 Right?

00:19:43.140 We definitely care about the law

00:19:44.640 and we would definitely care

00:19:46.580 that there are no victims.

00:19:48.120 That would be your ideal situation.

00:19:49.680 But I'm not going to defend

00:19:51.620 his sex life

00:19:52.360 because he doesn't defend it himself.

00:19:55.260 I mean beyond

00:19:55.880 it was completely legal

00:19:57.800 that's what he's saying.

00:19:59.200 But he's not saying

00:20:00.400 he was a good person.

00:20:02.560 I mean he sought treatment

00:20:03.580 for sex addiction

00:20:05.580 and that's

00:20:06.620 who does that?

00:20:08.440 Like who seeks

00:20:09.200 who seeks

00:20:10.960 treatment for sex addiction?

00:20:13.340 Unless you've really

00:20:14.260 got a problem.

00:20:15.600 Would you agree?

00:20:16.220 Because I would say

00:20:18.240 that being a celebrity 1.00

00:20:19.200 who could have sex 1.00

00:20:20.100 with 80 women a month 0.99

00:20:21.360 which is apparently

00:20:22.380 something he might have

00:20:23.260 claimed once

00:20:23.900 that doesn't feel

00:20:25.760 like a problem

00:20:26.800 so much as a

00:20:28.920 perfect life

00:20:30.400 for some people.

00:20:32.360 So

00:20:32.560 the fact that he

00:20:34.020 even recognized

00:20:34.820 it as enough of a problem

00:20:35.860 to seek professional help

00:20:37.800 suggests that

00:20:39.460 he's not defending

00:20:41.300 his sex life

00:20:42.380 beyond the fact

00:20:43.180 that it was legal

00:20:44.240 in his opinion.

00:20:44.940 Now

00:20:46.320 have I told you

00:20:48.340 about the

00:20:49.120 accusations

00:20:50.340 that I've received

00:20:51.520 from people

00:20:53.280 I've literally

00:20:54.060 never met

00:20:54.760 literally never met

00:20:56.520 live in other countries?

00:20:58.640 Yeah.

00:20:59.040 There are people

00:20:59.460 who make

00:20:59.900 very detailed

00:21:01.320 sexual allegations

00:21:02.620 about me

00:21:03.480 on a fairly

00:21:05.080 regular basis

00:21:05.980 who I've never met.

00:21:08.300 Some I have met

00:21:09.220 and then they have

00:21:10.340 stories that

00:21:11.020 are amazing.

00:21:12.240 from my perspective

00:21:20.800 when I read

00:21:22.240 a story

00:21:22.600 that's very detailed

00:21:23.600 and there's a

00:21:24.340 specific person

00:21:25.260 and maybe they put

00:21:26.120 a name on it

00:21:27.060 and there might

00:21:28.760 even be another

00:21:29.540 person who backs

00:21:30.900 up some part

00:21:31.480 of the story

00:21:32.060 that sort of thing

00:21:33.440 none of it

00:21:34.680 is credible

00:21:35.220 to me

00:21:35.780 because I've

00:21:37.260 lived through

00:21:37.700 the other side

00:21:38.320 of it.

00:21:38.580 I know

00:21:39.500 that you

00:21:39.980 can have

00:21:40.320 all kinds

00:21:40.820 of detail

00:21:41.360 from a real

00:21:42.520 person

00:21:42.980 that doesn't

00:21:44.160 mean anything.

00:21:45.520 Now I'm not

00:21:45.920 saying that

00:21:46.320 these people

00:21:46.820 are lying

00:21:47.280 I'm saying

00:21:48.360 I don't know

00:21:48.980 and I'm saying

00:21:50.600 that the context

00:21:51.360 is that news

00:21:52.140 about public

00:21:52.760 figures

00:21:53.180 really never

00:21:54.980 is true 0.89

00:21:55.480 in completeness.

00:21:58.320 Elements

00:21:58.740 can be true

00:21:59.300 but certainly

00:21:59.780 the context

00:22:00.460 would be removed.

00:22:01.260 For example

00:22:02.720 you're hearing

00:22:04.320 that he

00:22:04.980 had a long

00:22:06.560 term sexual

00:22:07.440 affair

00:22:07.780 with a

00:22:08.280 16 year

00:22:08.980 old.

00:22:10.680 Do you know

00:22:11.080 how long

00:22:11.520 it takes you

00:22:12.040 to read

00:22:12.360 the article

00:22:12.820 before it

00:22:13.600 gets to the

00:22:14.040 point where

00:22:14.500 16 is the

00:22:15.560 legal age

00:22:16.200 for sex

00:22:16.720 in the 0.68

00:22:17.500 country

00:22:17.780 that he

00:22:18.180 was in

00:22:18.640 Great Britain?

00:22:20.120 That was

00:22:20.740 legal.

00:22:22.140 Don't you

00:22:22.520 think that

00:22:23.000 saying it's

00:22:23.560 legal should

00:22:25.020 have been

00:22:25.260 somewhere near

00:22:25.840 the top?

00:22:27.420 As in

00:22:27.920 he's alleged

00:22:28.580 to have done

00:22:29.060 this with a

00:22:29.540 16 year

00:22:30.020 old.

00:22:30.180 And again

00:22:30.540 just to

00:22:31.460 make sure

00:22:31.940 everybody's

00:22:33.300 on the

00:22:33.480 same page

00:22:33.980 I'm not

00:22:34.660 defending him.

00:22:36.080 I'm just

00:22:36.820 describing the

00:22:37.540 situation.

00:22:38.560 He has to

00:22:39.340 defend himself.

00:22:40.620 Nobody else

00:22:41.060 can do that.

00:22:42.600 But I feel

00:22:44.260 like that

00:22:44.580 would be a

00:22:45.120 proper context.

00:22:47.460 Yes you

00:22:48.060 can have bad

00:22:48.660 feelings about

00:22:49.620 what he did.

00:22:50.920 Perfectly

00:22:51.520 that's your

00:22:52.420 opinion.

00:22:53.740 But you

00:22:55.720 need to say

00:22:56.300 it's legal

00:22:56.920 first.

00:22:58.720 That needs

00:22:59.400 to be right

00:22:59.840 at the top.

00:23:01.280 Right?

00:23:01.980 And apparently

00:23:02.800 the indication

00:23:04.480 is that he

00:23:05.100 was checking

00:23:05.620 to make sure

00:23:06.300 that she

00:23:06.640 was really

00:23:07.060 16.

00:23:07.880 Again,

00:23:08.420 I'm not

00:23:08.740 defending it.

00:23:09.980 I'm just

00:23:10.340 saying that

00:23:10.900 the evidence

00:23:11.740 suggests he

00:23:12.880 was trying

00:23:13.540 hard not

00:23:14.080 to break

00:23:14.520 the law.

00:23:15.940 And he

00:23:16.520 knew what

00:23:16.800 the law

00:23:17.080 was.

00:23:18.820 For

00:23:19.120 whatever

00:23:19.840 that's

00:23:20.200 worse.

00:23:20.620 I think

00:23:20.920 that just

00:23:21.260 needs to

00:23:21.620 be somewhere

00:23:22.020 in the

00:23:22.380 top of

00:23:23.200 the story.

00:23:24.340 Now there

00:23:24.700 were other

00:23:25.000 women who 0.99

00:23:25.500 made

00:23:25.660 accusations

00:23:26.260 that he

00:23:27.700 didn't take

00:23:29.140 no as

00:23:29.820 no.

00:23:31.480 So it's

00:23:32.260 not like

00:23:32.660 he raped 0.99

00:23:33.100 them with 1.00

00:23:33.480 a gun

00:23:33.820 or a

00:23:34.120 knife,

00:23:34.860 but he's

00:23:35.460 a very

00:23:35.760 big guy.

00:23:37.480 And the

00:23:38.720 claims are

00:23:39.280 that he

00:23:39.620 didn't take

00:23:40.040 no and

00:23:41.360 forced himself

00:23:42.700 on some

00:23:45.160 women who 0.99

00:23:45.740 felt bad

00:23:46.620 afterwards.

00:23:48.460 Now,

00:23:49.340 do you

00:23:50.300 think that

00:23:50.660 a story

00:23:51.160 like that

00:23:52.140 you can

00:23:53.420 trust by

00:23:55.180 hearing one

00:23:55.860 person's

00:23:56.480 side of

00:23:56.860 it?

00:23:58.680 Not by

00:23:59.440 its nature.

00:24:00.320 Again,

00:24:01.680 you should

00:24:02.120 definitely take

00:24:02.740 serious any

00:24:03.640 accusations,

00:24:05.160 because they're

00:24:05.540 serious

00:24:05.900 accusations.

00:24:06.720 So you

00:24:06.900 have to

00:24:07.120 take them

00:24:07.420 seriously.

00:24:08.260 I think

00:24:08.660 we'd all

00:24:08.980 agree with

00:24:09.380 that.

00:24:10.320 But when

00:24:11.160 you're trying

00:24:11.560 to decide

00:24:12.060 what's

00:24:12.400 true,

00:24:13.960 just hold

00:24:14.480 into your

00:24:14.800 mind that

00:24:15.240 you've so

00:24:15.680 far heard

00:24:16.180 one person's

00:24:17.000 narrative,

00:24:18.180 and we

00:24:18.560 know that

00:24:19.020 from watching

00:24:19.680 documentaries,

00:24:20.820 for example,

00:24:21.580 if you see

00:24:22.400 one person's

00:24:23.120 narrative about

00:24:23.920 anything,

00:24:24.900 it's very

00:24:25.320 convincing.

00:24:27.180 Any one

00:24:28.400 person narrative

00:24:29.160 without the

00:24:29.720 other side,

00:24:30.720 very, very

00:24:31.500 persuasive.

00:24:32.700 So you wake

00:24:33.260 up this morning

00:24:33.900 and you see

00:24:34.340 the narrative

00:24:34.800 from one

00:24:35.480 side,

00:24:36.400 and you say,

00:24:36.940 well, now I

00:24:37.480 know what

00:24:37.760 happened.

00:24:39.100 Do you?

00:24:40.900 Do you

00:24:41.540 really?

00:24:42.460 I doubt

00:24:43.160 it.

00:24:44.120 And here's

00:24:44.680 another thing

00:24:45.200 that probably

00:24:45.940 nobody would 0.99

00:24:46.440 be dumb 1.00

00:24:46.800 enough to 1.00

00:24:47.140 say except

00:24:47.620 me.

00:24:49.600 Have you

00:24:50.140 ever known

00:24:50.640 anybody who

00:24:51.340 was 6'4 and

00:24:53.220 good-looking,

00:24:54.400 like a guy,

00:24:55.540 and was also

00:24:56.020 really horny?

00:24:57.620 Do you know 0.99

00:24:58.280 how much sex a 0.99

00:24:59.340 6'4 horny single 1.00

00:25:00.960 guy has?

00:25:03.560 The stories that

00:25:04.680 I've heard is

00:25:05.880 that basically

00:25:06.440 every woman

00:25:07.260 says yes.

00:25:07.940 and you

00:25:09.720 don't even

00:25:10.060 have to

00:25:10.340 necessarily

00:25:10.780 get him

00:25:11.160 home.

00:25:12.280 Like, it's

00:25:12.940 in the

00:25:13.160 parking lot,

00:25:13.880 it's in

00:25:14.100 the car.

00:25:15.520 If you're

00:25:15.980 6'4 and

00:25:17.140 good-looking,

00:25:18.320 and you're

00:25:20.200 really horny

00:25:20.760 and aggressive, 0.83

00:25:21.320 you basically 1.00

00:25:22.760 fuck everything 1.00

00:25:23.500 that moves. 1.00

00:25:24.620 That's what I

00:25:25.820 hear from

00:25:26.960 people who

00:25:27.540 are in that

00:25:27.940 situation.

00:25:28.720 They can just 1.00

00:25:29.300 fuck anything 1.00

00:25:29.840 that moves. 1.00

00:25:30.340 Now, if you

00:25:33.720 were that

00:25:34.120 person, do

00:25:35.560 you think

00:25:35.900 you'd have

00:25:36.300 trouble knowing

00:25:37.000 where the

00:25:37.420 line was?

00:25:39.820 How would

00:25:40.500 you know

00:25:40.760 where the

00:25:41.060 line was?

00:25:43.040 Because let

00:25:43.700 me tell you

00:25:44.340 this as a

00:25:45.080 near certainty.

00:25:47.440 My guess is

00:25:48.340 that some

00:25:49.040 large percentage

00:25:50.020 of those

00:25:50.420 women said 1.00

00:25:51.020 no while

00:25:52.400 it was

00:25:52.660 happening.

00:25:54.980 I'll bet

00:25:55.660 you.

00:25:56.440 And they

00:25:56.800 were probably

00:25:57.140 thinking something

00:25:57.980 along the lines

00:25:58.700 of not yet,

00:25:59.640 or I don't

00:26:00.000 know you,

00:26:00.660 or this

00:26:01.000 isn't the

00:26:01.420 way I

00:26:01.740 wanted to

00:26:02.140 do it.

00:26:03.100 But then

00:26:03.540 when it

00:26:03.780 was over,

00:26:05.480 brag to

00:26:05.880 their friends

00:26:06.300 that they 0.97

00:26:06.580 had sex 0.93

00:26:07.080 with Russell 0.97

00:26:07.520 Brand.

00:26:08.520 Do you

00:26:08.760 think that's

00:26:09.140 ever happened?

00:26:10.300 Do you

00:26:10.540 think ever

00:26:11.000 there was

00:26:11.400 a woman 0.57

00:26:11.680 who was

00:26:12.080 definitely

00:26:12.480 saying no,

00:26:14.020 but when

00:26:14.840 it was over

00:26:15.360 she was

00:26:15.700 like,

00:26:15.880 ah,

00:26:16.040 that was

00:26:16.220 pretty good.

00:26:17.600 I'll brag

00:26:17.960 to my

00:26:18.220 friends about

00:26:18.660 this.

00:26:19.720 Do you

00:26:20.080 think that

00:26:20.380 ever

00:26:20.680 happened?

00:26:21.980 Probably.

00:26:23.180 Almost

00:26:23.620 certainly.

00:26:25.080 Because women 0.99

00:26:25.780 are complicated 0.85

00:26:26.380 and they

00:26:26.920 change their

00:26:27.380 minds.

00:26:27.900 At any

00:26:28.280 given moment

00:26:28.880 it's hard

00:26:29.300 to read

00:26:29.620 what they

00:26:29.920 want,

00:26:30.280 etc.

00:26:30.900 So,

00:26:31.760 under this

00:26:32.320 condition,

00:26:33.760 what are the

00:26:34.260 odds that

00:26:34.880 he went

00:26:35.460 too far

00:26:36.140 at least

00:26:37.760 once?

00:26:39.400 And

00:26:39.640 definitely

00:26:40.260 there was

00:26:40.620 a line

00:26:40.960 there,

00:26:41.740 but he

00:26:42.100 wasn't

00:26:42.360 hearing it

00:26:43.000 as different

00:26:43.980 from the

00:26:44.500 last hundred

00:26:45.020 times.

00:26:45.960 If a hundred

00:26:46.600 times in a row

00:26:47.360 a woman said

00:26:48.140 no,

00:26:48.520 but then later

00:26:49.060 she said,

00:26:49.500 that was pretty

00:26:49.980 good actually,

00:26:51.200 I'm glad I

00:26:51.620 didn't wait.

00:26:53.140 They wouldn't

00:26:53.940 say that.

00:26:54.460 But let's

00:26:55.760 say it

00:26:56.060 didn't go

00:26:56.540 poorly

00:26:57.000 a hundred

00:26:58.700 times in

00:26:59.180 a row.

00:27:00.280 If you

00:27:00.860 get to

00:27:01.140 101 and

00:27:02.680 you really

00:27:04.480 did cross

00:27:05.100 the line,

00:27:06.260 would you

00:27:06.640 know it?

00:27:08.400 Would you

00:27:09.000 necessarily know

00:27:09.820 it while it

00:27:10.220 was happening?

00:27:11.440 Especially if

00:27:12.380 you're on

00:27:13.080 drugs, for

00:27:13.820 example.

00:27:14.360 I don't

00:27:14.580 know if that

00:27:14.960 was the

00:27:15.220 case.

00:27:16.520 But, all

00:27:17.960 right, so I'm

00:27:18.620 not going to

00:27:18.980 defend them

00:27:19.520 because the

00:27:21.160 law is the

00:27:21.540 law and the

00:27:22.060 victims have

00:27:23.500 to be taken

00:27:25.340 seriously.

00:27:26.460 But I would

00:27:27.320 like to say

00:27:28.020 that if you

00:27:29.040 think you

00:27:29.420 know anything

00:27:30.060 about what

00:27:30.560 happened,

00:27:31.820 you would

00:27:32.500 be doing a

00:27:33.320 lot of

00:27:33.540 mind reading

00:27:34.080 and making

00:27:34.780 a lot of

00:27:35.160 assumptions

00:27:35.540 that are

00:27:36.500 100% false

00:27:37.760 all the

00:27:38.140 time, which

00:27:39.240 is that you

00:27:39.680 know what's

00:27:40.100 happening in

00:27:41.380 a celebrity's

00:27:42.040 life.

00:27:42.780 You really

00:27:43.100 don't.

00:27:44.540 So, have

00:27:45.900 I threaded

00:27:46.860 the needle

00:27:47.360 that

00:27:49.220 the

00:27:49.820 credibility

00:27:50.440 of the

00:27:50.940 story has

00:27:51.580 to be

00:27:51.860 considered

00:27:52.260 low, but

00:27:53.360 at the

00:27:53.680 same time

00:27:54.180 you have

00:27:54.440 to take

00:27:54.760 it seriously.

00:27:55.780 And those

00:27:56.060 are not

00:27:56.440 inconsistent.

00:27:58.140 You can

00:27:58.640 take it

00:27:59.040 deadly serious

00:27:59.900 100%,

00:28:00.820 while at

00:28:01.660 the same

00:28:01.960 time

00:28:02.220 understanding

00:28:02.960 it's in

00:28:03.880 a class

00:28:04.520 of stories

00:28:05.200 that generally

00:28:07.400 are low

00:28:07.800 credibility.

00:28:09.200 But that

00:28:09.780 doesn't mean

00:28:10.180 you don't

00:28:10.440 take it

00:28:10.740 seriously.

00:28:11.700 I want

00:28:11.960 to say

00:28:12.160 that as

00:28:12.480 many times

00:28:12.940 as I

00:28:13.240 need to.

00:28:14.600 All

00:28:14.720 right.

00:28:16.300 So,

00:28:16.740 that's

00:28:19.620 happening.

00:28:22.600 And

00:28:22.960 RFK Jr.

00:28:25.280 has got

00:28:25.520 a war

00:28:26.180 on plastic.

00:28:27.980 He's going

00:28:28.360 after plastic.

00:28:29.840 Now, I

00:28:30.080 think I've

00:28:31.320 got mixed 0.98

00:28:31.680 feelings about

00:28:32.220 this, because

00:28:33.480 I do have

00:28:34.380 discomfort with

00:28:35.420 all the

00:28:35.760 plastic in

00:28:36.700 our food

00:28:38.720 supply and

00:28:39.280 water and

00:28:39.740 all that.

00:28:41.140 On the

00:28:41.780 other hand,

00:28:42.520 the way he

00:28:43.080 wants to go

00:28:43.520 after it,

00:28:44.000 it includes

00:28:44.820 banning

00:28:45.280 fracking and

00:28:48.020 not subsidizing

00:28:49.180 plastic and

00:28:50.120 getting some

00:28:51.440 experts to

00:28:52.140 study it and

00:28:53.160 basically really

00:28:54.760 tightening down

00:28:56.220 on it and

00:28:56.920 looking for

00:28:57.360 alternatives and

00:28:58.720 removing plastic

00:28:59.920 from our

00:29:01.660 experience.

00:29:03.460 Or at least

00:29:04.340 as much as

00:29:04.840 possible.

00:29:05.400 Do you think

00:29:05.720 you can even

00:29:06.160 do that?

00:29:07.420 How in the

00:29:07.880 world would

00:29:08.200 you get rid

00:29:08.580 of plastic?

00:29:10.880 Yeah.

00:29:11.360 This doesn't

00:29:12.240 feel practical,

00:29:15.280 here's what I

00:29:19.260 would have

00:29:19.560 accepted.

00:29:21.020 Keep doing

00:29:21.740 what you're

00:29:22.120 doing, because

00:29:22.720 we need to

00:29:23.160 keep the

00:29:23.480 economy running.

00:29:25.200 But at

00:29:25.780 the same

00:29:26.140 time, maybe

00:29:27.340 you could

00:29:27.980 fund plastic

00:29:29.940 cleanup, maybe 0.71

00:29:31.440 you could fund

00:29:32.060 a plastic study

00:29:33.220 to find out

00:29:33.820 how dangerous

00:29:34.280 it is.

00:29:35.060 Maybe you

00:29:35.520 could fund

00:29:36.620 treatments, if

00:29:38.300 there's any

00:29:38.600 kind of

00:29:38.840 treatment to

00:29:39.380 remove it

00:29:39.800 from your

00:29:40.100 body.

00:29:40.640 Maybe you

00:29:41.080 could fund

00:29:41.740 alternatives,

00:29:43.440 somebody to

00:29:44.480 invent a

00:29:45.380 safer

00:29:47.420 alternative.

00:29:48.360 Those all

00:29:48.800 make sense.

00:29:50.940 Those all

00:29:51.360 make sense.

00:29:52.960 But going

00:29:54.460 for the

00:29:54.860 fracking

00:29:55.260 before you've

00:29:56.140 got replacements,

00:29:57.860 that feels

00:29:58.500 backwards.

00:30:00.360 I feel you

00:30:00.740 get the

00:30:01.360 replacements

00:30:01.920 first and

00:30:02.660 then maybe

00:30:03.820 get rid of

00:30:04.280 your fracking

00:30:05.080 if you still

00:30:05.620 want to.

00:30:05.960 All right.

00:30:10.020 You should

00:30:10.720 be following

00:30:11.260 Mike Benz,

00:30:12.460 B-E-N-Z, 1.00

00:30:14.100 on the

00:30:15.860 X platform.

00:30:17.320 He's got

00:30:17.780 some real

00:30:18.120 gems,

00:30:18.680 especially

00:30:19.100 about

00:30:19.400 intelligence

00:30:20.140 community.

00:30:22.360 And here's

00:30:22.840 one that I

00:30:23.540 like.

00:30:25.540 In

00:30:25.980 1954,

00:30:28.940 apparently we

00:30:29.840 know now,

00:30:30.740 because we

00:30:31.300 know what

00:30:32.000 the CIA did

00:30:33.560 in the past.

00:30:34.560 If you

00:30:34.900 wait long

00:30:35.360 enough, it

00:30:36.160 all comes

00:30:36.500 out.

00:30:37.220 So we

00:30:37.620 know that

00:30:37.900 in 1954,

00:30:38.860 the CIA

00:30:39.360 engineered a

00:30:40.600 coup in

00:30:41.380 Guatemala.

00:30:42.940 And the

00:30:43.580 Guatemalan

00:30:44.080 government

00:30:44.540 found out

00:30:45.280 that the

00:30:46.440 CIA had

00:30:47.200 organized a

00:30:47.860 coup, or

00:30:48.560 maybe they

00:30:48.900 just found

00:30:49.280 out it

00:30:49.520 was a

00:30:49.800 coup.

00:30:50.760 And so

00:30:51.720 the people

00:30:52.140 involved in

00:30:52.820 the coup

00:30:53.240 sent a

00:30:54.620 recommendation

00:30:56.460 to their

00:30:58.800 handlers.

00:31:00.000 And the

00:31:00.360 recommendation

00:31:00.680 was in

00:31:01.520 writing.

00:31:01.960 So they

00:31:02.200 actually have

00:31:02.600 this in

00:31:02.880 writing.

00:31:03.900 It was

00:31:04.400 an item

00:31:05.560 on a

00:31:05.880 checklist,

00:31:06.460 said,

00:31:06.820 quote,

00:31:07.420 if possible,

00:31:08.860 fabricate a

00:31:09.580 big human

00:31:10.100 interest story

00:31:10.760 like flying

00:31:11.600 saucers,

00:31:12.880 birth

00:31:13.140 sectuplets,

00:31:14.460 and remote

00:31:14.960 areas to

00:31:15.780 take play

00:31:16.420 away.

00:31:18.140 In

00:31:18.780 1954,

00:31:21.040 an element

00:31:21.640 of our

00:31:22.040 government

00:31:22.500 at least

00:31:23.660 considered

00:31:24.260 doing UFO

00:31:27.260 stories to

00:31:28.060 divert from

00:31:28.800 CIA

00:31:29.280 activities.

00:31:29.980 on

00:31:34.220 September

00:31:34.820 13th of

00:31:35.560 this year,

00:31:36.540 El Chapo's

00:31:37.260 wife was 0.99

00:31:37.860 released from

00:31:38.560 custody,

00:31:39.740 which probably

00:31:40.300 a lot of

00:31:40.740 you thought,

00:31:41.640 huh,

00:31:42.840 I have many

00:31:43.860 questions about

00:31:44.560 this.

00:31:45.520 Why would

00:31:45.960 El Chapo's

00:31:46.620 wife be 0.83

00:31:47.180 released?

00:31:48.600 On the

00:31:49.000 same day,

00:31:50.660 the headline

00:31:51.960 said,

00:31:52.360 UFO expert

00:31:53.080 displays

00:31:53.660 supposed

00:31:54.140 non-human

00:31:54.960 alien

00:31:55.400 corpses

00:31:55.880 in Mexico's

00:31:57.340 Congress.

00:31:57.760 so

00:32:01.660 apparently

00:32:05.480 using UFO

00:32:08.220 stories to

00:32:09.000 divert you

00:32:09.720 from

00:32:10.160 intelligence

00:32:11.440 agency

00:32:12.140 activities

00:32:12.840 feels like

00:32:15.780 that's just

00:32:16.260 a standard

00:32:16.740 op.

00:32:18.760 Let me

00:32:19.600 ask you

00:32:19.940 this.

00:32:21.580 Why is

00:32:22.320 so much

00:32:22.680 fentanyl

00:32:23.200 coming into

00:32:23.760 the United

00:32:24.140 States,

00:32:24.640 and why

00:32:25.400 are we

00:32:25.680 doing so

00:32:26.780 little to

00:32:27.320 stop it,

00:32:28.200 except we

00:32:28.780 do seem

00:32:29.180 to be

00:32:29.440 doing

00:32:29.740 something

00:32:30.440 with

00:32:30.820 China's 0.76

00:32:31.580 supplier?

00:32:33.220 It feels

00:32:33.960 like we're

00:32:34.300 doing more

00:32:34.880 in China

00:32:35.900 than we're

00:32:36.400 doing with

00:32:38.340 the cartels.

00:32:39.380 Well,

00:32:39.960 I would say

00:32:40.400 that there's

00:32:40.960 an obvious

00:32:41.360 answer.

00:32:42.320 There must

00:32:42.920 be some

00:32:43.380 powerful force

00:32:44.400 in the

00:32:45.480 United States,

00:32:46.460 maybe Congress,

00:32:48.140 maybe the

00:32:48.620 intelligence

00:32:49.000 community,

00:32:50.100 and therefore

00:32:50.700 Congress has

00:32:51.380 to go along,

00:32:52.180 who wants

00:32:53.100 the fentanyl

00:32:53.720 to be coming

00:32:54.260 in exactly

00:32:54.960 the way it

00:32:55.440 is.

00:32:56.900 This can't

00:32:58.180 be seen

00:32:58.540 as an

00:32:58.900 accident or

00:32:59.660 incompetence.

00:33:01.160 Would you

00:33:01.480 agree that

00:33:02.240 we've been

00:33:02.980 watching the

00:33:03.560 fentanyl flow

00:33:04.300 in at

00:33:05.660 such a rate

00:33:06.340 that it

00:33:06.880 cannot be

00:33:07.520 explained by

00:33:08.880 we want to

00:33:09.560 stop it,

00:33:10.100 but we

00:33:10.340 don't know

00:33:10.740 how?

00:33:12.560 Would you

00:33:13.240 agree?

00:33:13.820 At this

00:33:14.300 point,

00:33:14.640 it's super

00:33:15.220 obvious that

00:33:15.920 whoever controls

00:33:16.840 our government

00:33:17.560 wants the

00:33:18.820 fentanyl to

00:33:19.360 come in.

00:33:19.620 now,

00:33:21.580 people say,

00:33:22.940 oh,

00:33:23.220 that's how

00:33:24.480 the CIA

00:33:25.140 secretly funds

00:33:26.520 itself,

00:33:27.060 by supporting

00:33:27.900 the cartels

00:33:28.660 and making

00:33:29.120 some money

00:33:29.560 that way.

00:33:30.800 Maybe,

00:33:31.440 I don't know.

00:33:32.220 That doesn't

00:33:32.740 sound out of,

00:33:33.760 that would not

00:33:34.340 be out of

00:33:35.060 the ordinary,

00:33:36.140 but I don't

00:33:37.220 know,

00:33:37.500 I don't have

00:33:37.840 any evidence

00:33:38.300 of that.

00:33:39.160 So I don't

00:33:39.600 know if it's

00:33:40.020 the intelligence

00:33:40.480 community,

00:33:42.560 but what else

00:33:43.660 could it be?

00:33:45.900 Unless the

00:33:46.580 cartels have

00:33:47.220 direct control

00:33:48.260 of enough

00:33:48.960 members of

00:33:49.540 Congress that

00:33:50.840 they can just

00:33:51.380 force a vote

00:33:52.020 any way they

00:33:52.580 want,

00:33:53.260 which is

00:33:53.780 possible.

00:33:55.240 What else

00:33:55.900 could it be

00:33:56.380 besides the

00:33:57.020 intelligence

00:33:57.400 community wants

00:33:58.560 it to come

00:33:58.920 in?

00:33:59.960 I can't think

00:34:00.780 of any other

00:34:01.300 alternatives.

00:34:02.440 Because if you're

00:34:03.260 telling me that

00:34:03.940 even Biden

00:34:04.840 couldn't figure

00:34:05.660 out how to

00:34:06.100 stop the

00:34:06.520 flow of

00:34:06.940 fentanyl,

00:34:07.760 I'm pretty

00:34:08.500 sure he

00:34:08.840 could,

00:34:09.840 because he

00:34:10.300 has people

00:34:10.740 who work

00:34:11.120 for him.

00:34:12.260 You don't

00:34:12.780 think that

00:34:13.160 there's anybody

00:34:13.720 on border

00:34:14.260 patrol who

00:34:15.800 would know

00:34:16.160 how to stop

00:34:16.640 the fentanyl,

00:34:17.320 or at least

00:34:17.700 slow it down.

00:34:18.920 Of course

00:34:19.560 they do.

00:34:20.720 Of course

00:34:20.980 they do.

00:34:21.400 You don't

00:34:21.680 think our

00:34:22.020 military doesn't

00:34:22.740 have snipers?

00:34:24.580 You just put a

00:34:25.240 sniper on the

00:34:25.840 border and 0.99

00:34:26.260 take out all 0.97

00:34:26.900 of the human 0.91

00:34:27.980 traffickers who

00:34:28.860 are letting the

00:34:29.900 people flow

00:34:30.440 across?

00:34:31.380 You just

00:34:31.800 drop them

00:34:32.580 where they

00:34:32.880 stand.

00:34:33.400 There are a

00:34:33.760 million ways

00:34:34.280 to stop the

00:34:36.140 illegal flow of

00:34:37.200 people and the

00:34:38.420 illegal flow of

00:34:40.080 fentanyl.

00:34:42.180 Now, so at

00:34:43.920 this point,

00:34:44.500 don't you say

00:34:45.320 that it's

00:34:45.640 obviously a

00:34:46.260 policy?

00:34:46.620 And it

00:34:48.140 must be

00:34:48.500 Democrat-led,

00:34:49.760 but you have

00:34:50.920 to wonder why

00:34:51.480 Trump couldn't

00:34:52.000 do anything

00:34:52.440 about it.

00:34:53.580 If Trump

00:34:54.340 couldn't do

00:34:54.780 anything about

00:34:55.380 it, that

00:34:56.440 suggests it's

00:34:57.280 somewhere else

00:34:57.820 in the

00:34:58.460 government,

00:34:59.260 because I'm

00:34:59.600 pretty sure

00:35:00.040 Trump does

00:35:00.580 not want

00:35:01.020 fentanyl coming

00:35:01.720 into the

00:35:02.080 country.

00:35:02.840 Can we all

00:35:03.440 agree that

00:35:05.020 there's no

00:35:05.600 chance,

00:35:06.760 no chance,

00:35:08.520 that Trump

00:35:09.300 wants any

00:35:10.480 fentanyl to

00:35:11.080 come into this

00:35:11.640 country?

00:35:11.900 There's no

00:35:12.400 chance.

00:35:13.480 But he

00:35:13.920 couldn't stop

00:35:14.460 it.

00:35:15.340 He didn't

00:35:15.640 even slow

00:35:15.980 it down.

00:35:17.240 That suggests

00:35:17.900 there's somebody

00:35:18.460 more important

00:35:19.100 than the

00:35:19.440 president at

00:35:20.760 any given

00:35:21.240 time who

00:35:22.400 is in

00:35:22.740 control of

00:35:23.360 that issue.

00:35:24.720 Who would

00:35:25.340 be more

00:35:25.760 important,

00:35:26.420 who would

00:35:26.720 have more

00:35:27.120 control than

00:35:27.660 the president

00:35:28.100 of the United

00:35:28.540 States in

00:35:29.680 the United

00:35:30.100 States?

00:35:32.160 The deep

00:35:32.880 state and

00:35:33.580 the intelligence

00:35:34.760 groups.

00:35:36.340 I mean,

00:35:36.540 who else

00:35:36.780 could it be?

00:35:37.220 So,

00:35:38.960 process of

00:35:39.500 elimination.

00:35:42.820 The simulation

00:35:43.780 is making us

00:35:44.640 laugh with

00:35:45.220 this interview.

00:35:45.980 ABC News

00:35:46.700 was interviewing

00:35:47.280 Anthony Blinken.

00:35:49.780 And Blinken

00:35:51.520 was asked about

00:35:52.420 these new

00:35:53.040 long-range

00:35:53.740 missiles the

00:35:54.340 U.S. is 0.80

00:35:54.820 giving to

00:35:56.360 Ukraine.

00:35:57.540 And it

00:35:57.880 says,

00:35:58.160 the question

00:35:58.900 was,

00:36:00.360 are you

00:36:01.320 okay if

00:36:02.020 Ukraine uses

00:36:02.900 those missiles

00:36:03.600 to strike

00:36:04.860 deep into

00:36:05.500 Russia? 0.61

00:36:07.220 And Blinken

00:36:08.180 said,

00:36:09.240 and here's

00:36:09.680 the funny

00:36:10.000 part,

00:36:11.040 he said it

00:36:11.720 without

00:36:12.140 Blinken. 0.94

00:36:14.720 Blinken 0.98

00:36:15.240 didn't blink,

00:36:17.040 and he

00:36:17.560 looked like

00:36:18.040 he was in

00:36:18.420 a hostage

00:36:18.880 video.

00:36:20.800 You have

00:36:21.360 to see it.

00:36:22.960 He looks

00:36:23.440 like he's

00:36:23.860 in a hostage

00:36:24.360 video.

00:36:25.500 He does

00:36:25.960 not look

00:36:26.640 like that's

00:36:27.220 his opinion.

00:36:29.260 Because his

00:36:29.940 eyes don't

00:36:30.480 blink,

00:36:31.000 and he

00:36:31.220 looks at

00:36:31.520 the camera

00:36:31.900 and he

00:36:32.220 goes,

00:36:33.820 well,

00:36:34.240 that's

00:36:34.520 the targeting,

00:36:36.080 that's

00:36:36.260 that would

00:36:37.580 be their

00:36:38.420 decision,

00:36:39.720 not ours.

00:36:43.540 Okay,

00:36:43.940 I may have

00:36:44.280 exaggerated that

00:36:45.000 a little bit,

00:36:45.620 but he

00:36:45.900 looked

00:36:46.080 uncomfortable.

00:36:48.500 And I

00:36:49.940 think he

00:36:50.360 knows that

00:36:50.880 this could

00:36:51.260 start World

00:36:51.980 War III,

00:36:53.500 or a

00:36:53.900 nuclear war,

00:36:55.380 and I

00:36:57.320 don't think

00:36:57.680 he's happy

00:36:58.120 about it.

00:37:00.920 So what's

00:37:01.620 going on?

00:37:03.220 It doesn't

00:37:04.000 sound like

00:37:04.560 Blinken,

00:37:04.960 is on

00:37:07.520 the inside

00:37:08.060 track of

00:37:08.620 people who

00:37:08.980 have any

00:37:09.300 power.

00:37:10.600 I feel

00:37:11.080 like he

00:37:11.420 was just

00:37:11.740 sent out

00:37:12.080 to explain

00:37:12.660 something that

00:37:13.220 can't be

00:37:13.560 explained.

00:37:15.240 We also

00:37:16.000 saw there's

00:37:16.520 some question

00:37:17.040 about Tom

00:37:17.620 Cotton,

00:37:18.160 who came

00:37:18.680 out publicly

00:37:19.400 and said,

00:37:20.580 yes,

00:37:21.140 we have to

00:37:21.600 support Ukraine

00:37:23.320 so that they

00:37:24.960 can win.

00:37:26.780 Win?

00:37:28.060 Tom

00:37:28.540 Cotton?

00:37:29.640 Tom Cotton

00:37:30.420 has been

00:37:30.780 watching the

00:37:31.440 Ukraine-Russia

00:37:32.280 situation,

00:37:32.980 and

00:37:34.160 believes,

00:37:34.700 does he

00:37:34.960 actually

00:37:35.240 believe that

00:37:37.340 they could

00:37:37.700 win?

00:37:38.860 And what

00:37:39.480 would winning

00:37:39.940 look like?

00:37:41.980 But he

00:37:42.500 used that

00:37:42.900 word,

00:37:43.480 win,

00:37:44.360 as if that

00:37:45.220 were one

00:37:46.280 of our

00:37:46.500 options.

00:37:47.220 I didn't

00:37:47.820 know winning

00:37:48.200 was an

00:37:48.540 option.

00:37:49.480 When did

00:37:49.900 winning become

00:37:50.560 even one of

00:37:51.460 the possibilities?

00:37:53.300 I mean,

00:37:53.620 early on,

00:37:54.320 you could have

00:37:54.660 said,

00:37:54.860 well,

00:37:55.080 anything could

00:37:55.540 happen,

00:37:55.880 but at

00:37:56.100 this point,

00:37:57.540 there isn't

00:37:58.020 any winning.

00:37:58.540 what kind

00:38:00.380 of winning

00:38:00.800 could you

00:38:01.240 have,

00:38:01.620 possibly?

00:38:02.980 So I've

00:38:04.040 seen people

00:38:04.460 question his

00:38:05.460 independence,

00:38:06.440 if you know

00:38:06.920 what I mean,

00:38:08.020 and I

00:38:10.240 would question

00:38:10.760 it as well.

00:38:12.240 I would

00:38:12.820 think that

00:38:13.260 there are

00:38:13.620 some big

00:38:14.240 questions that

00:38:14.860 have to be

00:38:15.180 asked here

00:38:15.600 about why

00:38:18.040 that is his

00:38:19.040 opinion.

00:38:19.320 And the

00:38:20.460 thing is that

00:38:21.120 Tom is

00:38:23.920 well understood

00:38:24.720 as a

00:38:25.220 reasonable

00:38:25.640 person.

00:38:26.100 so that

00:38:28.480 it's not

00:38:29.000 tracking.

00:38:29.660 Wait,

00:38:29.900 why would

00:38:30.700 a reasonable

00:38:31.220 person say

00:38:31.860 Ukraine could

00:38:32.500 win if we

00:38:33.100 give them

00:38:33.420 more money?

00:38:34.380 That doesn't

00:38:35.100 sound reasonable.

00:38:36.760 A reasonable

00:38:37.540 person would

00:38:38.160 be saying

00:38:38.620 something like,

00:38:40.040 well,

00:38:40.300 it looks like

00:38:40.660 there's a

00:38:41.040 stalemate,

00:38:41.660 so everybody

00:38:42.100 who dies

00:38:42.580 from this

00:38:42.940 point on

00:38:43.360 is a

00:38:43.600 waste of

00:38:43.980 death,

00:38:44.920 so let's

00:38:45.500 just wrap

00:38:46.280 this up.

00:38:47.820 That's what

00:38:48.420 a rational

00:38:48.880 person would

00:38:49.400 say.

00:38:50.280 So why

00:38:50.620 would Tom

00:38:51.060 Cotton appear

00:38:53.420 to be on

00:38:53.860 the side of

00:38:54.320 something that's

00:38:54.840 irrational?

00:38:56.100 You know

00:38:56.440 what it

00:38:56.660 feels like?

00:38:58.680 It feels

00:38:59.520 like a

00:38:59.880 hostage

00:39:00.220 tape again.

00:39:02.100 I feel

00:39:02.920 like,

00:39:03.940 let me

00:39:04.380 just put

00:39:04.740 that out

00:39:05.080 there.

00:39:05.960 That opinion

00:39:06.880 seemed so

00:39:07.660 opposite of

00:39:08.560 what I'd

00:39:08.980 expect from

00:39:09.720 Tom Cotton

00:39:10.420 that I feel

00:39:11.760 like he was

00:39:12.280 signaling it

00:39:12.880 was under

00:39:13.260 duress.

00:39:17.980 What do

00:39:18.580 you think?

00:39:20.000 It was

00:39:20.760 almost like

00:39:21.260 he's trying

00:39:21.620 to tell

00:39:22.040 us that

00:39:22.960 that's not

00:39:23.400 his real

00:39:23.820 opinion,

00:39:24.460 because going

00:39:25.260 all the

00:39:25.580 way to

00:39:25.920 wind just

00:39:27.360 doesn't

00:39:27.780 sound like

00:39:28.260 something that

00:39:28.720 would really

00:39:29.080 come out of

00:39:29.500 his mouth

00:39:30.020 in the real

00:39:31.100 world.

00:39:32.060 It sounds

00:39:32.500 like he's

00:39:32.920 sending us

00:39:33.440 a signal

00:39:33.880 that it's

00:39:34.260 under duress.

00:39:39.240 Right?

00:39:40.900 So both

00:39:41.700 Blinken and

00:39:42.860 Tom Cotton

00:39:44.240 both are

00:39:44.960 acting like

00:39:45.500 people who

00:39:46.320 are not on

00:39:48.260 the page but

00:39:48.980 want you to

00:39:49.540 know it.

00:39:49.920 I swear to

00:39:51.240 God even

00:39:51.600 Blinken 0.98

00:39:51.920 looked like

00:39:52.380 he was

00:39:52.660 signaling.

00:39:54.080 I don't

00:39:54.420 really believe

00:39:54.920 this.

00:39:56.280 Well it's

00:39:56.940 totally up to

00:39:57.500 the Ukrainians

00:39:58.280 to do the

00:39:59.000 targeting.

00:40:00.640 It's up to

00:40:01.400 them.

00:40:03.540 I mean

00:40:03.840 seriously.

00:40:07.480 All right

00:40:08.120 so that was

00:40:08.600 funny watching

00:40:09.540 them do

00:40:10.700 hostage videos.

00:40:12.680 And so

00:40:13.460 Joy Behar

00:40:14.700 on The View

00:40:15.380 says that

00:40:17.340 the young

00:40:17.840 Republicans 1.00

00:40:18.400 are stupid 1.00

00:40:19.560 to use 1.00

00:40:19.960 her word.

00:40:21.380 And she

00:40:22.020 even said

00:40:22.500 that Vivek 1.00

00:40:23.480 was stupid 1.00

00:40:24.020 while mispronouncing 1.00

00:40:25.160 his name.

00:40:26.680 And I'd

00:40:27.820 like to see

00:40:28.480 Vivek Ramaswamy

00:40:29.940 take an IQ

00:40:31.820 test at the

00:40:32.660 same time as

00:40:33.400 Joy Behar

00:40:34.180 while we

00:40:35.700 watch.

00:40:36.560 I'll just

00:40:36.940 sit there for

00:40:37.480 half an hour

00:40:38.040 or whatever

00:40:38.380 it takes

00:40:38.740 them to do

00:40:39.140 the test.

00:40:39.960 And then

00:40:40.380 we'll just

00:40:41.140 grade them

00:40:41.600 and then

00:40:43.060 compare.

00:40:43.380 Can you

00:40:45.700 even imagine

00:40:46.580 Joy Behar

00:40:48.820 calling

00:40:51.740 Vivek 1.00

00:40:52.740 stupid? 1.00

00:40:58.300 Like 1.00

00:40:58.580 isn't that

00:40:59.940 beyond

00:41:00.540 now remember

00:41:02.600 my definition

00:41:03.340 of humor?

00:41:05.060 Is that

00:41:05.420 a small

00:41:06.140 definition?

00:41:06.600 Is that

00:41:06.880 like a

00:41:07.360 small

00:41:07.880 exaggeration?

00:41:11.220 No.

00:41:11.940 is it

00:41:13.280 like a

00:41:13.960 really big

00:41:14.480 exaggeration?

00:41:16.760 It's not

00:41:17.560 even that.

00:41:18.860 It's all

00:41:19.520 the way

00:41:19.880 to

00:41:20.260 batshit 0.97

00:41:21.080 crazy. 0.66

00:41:22.520 So it's

00:41:22.880 just funny.

00:41:24.540 How can

00:41:25.080 you take

00:41:25.420 seriously

00:41:25.940 Joy Behar

00:41:26.700 calling

00:41:27.640 probably the

00:41:28.560 smartest

00:41:28.860 person who's

00:41:29.400 ever run

00:41:29.780 for president

00:41:30.340 who wasn't

00:41:30.880 named

00:41:31.220 Thomas Jefferson

00:41:32.140 that he's 1.00

00:41:34.580 stupid? 1.00

00:41:34.940 what part 1.00

00:41:38.880 of her

00:41:39.180 brain

00:41:39.680 that little 0.56

00:41:40.400 p in

00:41:40.920 there

00:41:41.180 gets her

00:41:43.180 to that

00:41:43.520 point of

00:41:43.900 view?

00:41:45.600 You know

00:41:46.100 I would

00:41:46.500 have respected

00:41:47.160 her opinion

00:41:47.720 if she'd

00:41:48.280 said something

00:41:48.820 like this.

00:41:50.580 Well

00:41:50.900 some of

00:41:51.640 them are

00:41:51.900 very smart

00:41:52.600 but I

00:41:53.780 worry that

00:41:54.420 they have

00:41:54.740 the wrong

00:41:55.080 motives or

00:41:55.900 they've been

00:41:56.320 brainwashed or

00:41:57.320 they're just

00:41:57.980 part of the

00:41:58.560 team play or

00:42:00.220 something like

00:42:00.580 that.

00:42:00.780 Those things

00:42:01.180 would make

00:42:01.560 some sense

00:42:02.140 but to

00:42:04.140 call the

00:42:04.580 smartest

00:42:04.900 person we've

00:42:05.940 seen in

00:42:06.440 modern times

00:42:07.440 running for

00:42:08.060 president and

00:42:09.140 to say that

00:42:09.680 he's literally 1.00

00:42:10.200 stupid compared 1.00

00:42:11.600 to the people 1.00

00:42:12.320 on the view

00:42:13.020 and their

00:42:13.680 audience is

00:42:14.940 pretty funny.

00:42:16.680 Pretty funny.

00:42:18.340 Could you

00:42:18.760 imagine the

00:42:19.280 view if that

00:42:19.980 ran during

00:42:20.600 the time of

00:42:21.800 the founding

00:42:22.220 of the

00:42:22.540 country?

00:42:24.880 Yeah.

00:42:25.800 Well

00:42:26.220 George

00:42:26.800 Washington is

00:42:27.400 obviously a

00:42:27.980 warmonger and

00:42:29.500 Madison and

00:42:31.160 Jefferson,

00:42:32.600 two little 1.00

00:42:33.000 idiots, 1.00

00:42:34.220 two fucking 1.00

00:42:34.700 stupid people. 1.00

00:42:36.740 That would be 1.00

00:42:37.460 the view back

00:42:38.240 in 1770

00:42:39.640 whatever.

00:42:40.760 All right.

00:42:45.440 I've heard

00:42:46.180 some people

00:42:46.600 say that the

00:42:47.220 video of

00:42:48.940 Representative

00:42:50.380 Boebert

00:42:51.540 having some

00:42:53.040 handsy fun

00:42:53.800 with her

00:42:54.320 date in

00:42:55.640 that

00:42:56.180 theater.

00:42:59.080 Some are

00:42:59.680 saying that

00:43:00.200 the Democrat

00:43:00.980 that she

00:43:01.420 is seeing

00:43:02.000 he's a

00:43:02.580 Democrat

00:43:02.920 they say

00:43:03.440 a bar

00:43:04.320 owner

00:43:04.560 and they're

00:43:05.420 saying it

00:43:05.780 must be a

00:43:06.240 set up

00:43:06.680 because he's

00:43:07.960 a Democrat

00:43:08.380 and he did

00:43:09.200 it in public

00:43:09.720 to sort of

00:43:11.640 embarrass her.

00:43:13.600 Now

00:43:13.980 I've got some

00:43:15.920 questions.

00:43:18.420 Is it true

00:43:19.480 that men

00:43:22.160 who are

00:43:22.460 Democrat

00:43:22.840 won't do

00:43:23.640 heterosexual 0.84

00:43:24.360 stuff unless 0.94

00:43:25.040 you pay

00:43:25.460 them?

00:43:25.680 is that

00:43:28.720 sort of

00:43:29.480 what you're

00:43:29.780 thinking?

00:43:31.020 It's like

00:43:31.480 all right

00:43:32.080 we're going

00:43:32.320 to have to

00:43:32.580 set up

00:43:33.760 this

00:43:34.040 representative

00:43:34.620 Boebert

00:43:35.060 but we're

00:43:36.000 going to

00:43:36.180 need a

00:43:36.460 heterosexual 0.84

00:43:37.040 and they

00:43:38.640 looked around

00:43:39.220 and like

00:43:39.620 all right

00:43:39.980 no no

00:43:41.320 not a

00:43:41.660 Republican

00:43:42.040 and somebody

00:43:42.680 says all

00:43:43.100 right

00:43:43.280 could we

00:43:44.300 get

00:43:44.640 you know

00:43:46.320 maybe we

00:43:46.920 could get

00:43:47.420 Stephen

00:43:50.600 Miller

00:43:50.980 no no

00:43:52.260 you can't

00:43:53.060 have a

00:43:53.320 Republican

00:43:53.820 no Republicans

00:43:54.740 we're going

00:43:55.540 to have to

00:43:55.760 get a

00:43:56.000 Democrat

00:43:56.320 but we

00:43:57.760 need this

00:43:58.200 Democrat

00:43:58.560 to do

00:43:59.000 heterosexual 0.84

00:43:59.660 stuff

00:44:00.200 like how

00:44:01.600 are we

00:44:01.800 going to

00:44:01.980 get them

00:44:02.200 to do

00:44:02.460 that

00:44:02.800 like

00:44:03.640 money

00:44:04.620 maybe

00:44:06.000 for money

00:44:06.580 you know

00:44:08.000 some

00:44:08.240 people

00:44:08.900 some

00:44:09.380 Democrats

00:44:09.860 will go

00:44:10.340 non-gay 1.00

00:44:10.920 for money 0.91

00:44:11.360 so they

00:44:12.800 got a

00:44:13.040 Democrat

00:44:13.340 to do

00:44:13.760 some

00:44:13.920 heterosexual 0.84

00:44:14.460 stuff

00:44:14.860 on camera

00:44:15.360 to

00:44:16.380 Framer

00:44:17.780 come on

00:44:21.260 this is

00:44:21.600 funny

00:44:21.900 it's

00:44:23.220 funny

00:44:23.480 that they

00:44:23.800 had to

00:44:24.040 pay a

00:44:24.340 Democrat

00:44:24.680 to act

00:44:25.080 heterosexual 0.84

00:44:25.860 that's 0.82

00:44:26.660 just

00:44:26.840 funny

00:44:27.200 it's

00:44:28.780 not

00:44:28.920 really

00:44:29.160 what

00:44:29.360 happened

00:44:29.620 but it's

00:44:29.980 funny

00:44:30.180 to think

00:44:30.520 about

00:44:30.720 it

00:44:31.360 and

00:44:32.900 then

00:44:33.060 here's

00:44:33.280 the other

00:44:33.540 question

00:44:33.880 I asked

00:44:34.340 is that

00:44:35.440 what

00:44:36.620 heterosexual 0.84

00:44:37.400 man

00:44:37.980 would have

00:44:39.520 to be

00:44:39.960 paid

00:44:40.340 money

00:44:40.740 to want

00:44:42.580 to feel

00:44:43.080 up

00:44:43.400 Bober

00:44:44.540 in a

00:44:45.040 theater

00:44:45.520 I don't

00:44:48.620 know

00:44:48.800 nobody's

00:44:49.420 offered

00:44:49.660 me

00:44:49.880 any

00:44:50.100 money

00:44:50.320 and

00:44:50.580 if

00:44:51.320 there

00:44:51.440 was

00:44:51.560 any

00:44:51.760 kind

00:44:51.980 of

00:44:52.100 a

00:44:52.280 line

00:44:52.760 I

00:44:53.780 would

00:44:53.940 get

00:44:54.100 in

00:44:54.300 it

00:44:54.720 so

00:44:55.660 you know

00:44:57.360 I usually

00:44:57.740 don't like

00:44:58.140 to travel

00:44:58.660 but if

00:44:59.800 it were

00:45:00.000 an

00:45:00.140 option

00:45:00.440 I would

00:45:02.080 even

00:45:02.260 pay

00:45:02.460 for the

00:45:02.720 ticket

00:45:02.980 but

00:45:04.960 yeah

00:45:05.540 I think

00:45:06.100 most

00:45:06.340 heterosexual 0.84

00:45:06.820 men

00:45:07.120 would like

00:45:07.460 to take

00:45:07.800 her

00:45:07.900 to the

00:45:08.220 theater

00:45:08.500 so

00:45:10.220 I

00:45:10.400 don't

00:45:10.560 think

00:45:10.820 it's

00:45:11.000 a

00:45:11.120 set

00:45:11.260 up

00:45:11.500 all

00:45:13.840 right

00:45:14.040 what do

00:45:17.720 you call

00:45:18.160 it

00:45:18.380 there's

00:45:18.840 a

00:45:18.980 political

00:45:19.360 term

00:45:19.760 I'm

00:45:19.980 looking

00:45:20.220 for

00:45:20.580 and I

00:45:21.280 couldn't

00:45:21.700 think

00:45:21.940 of it

00:45:22.160 when I

00:45:22.400 was

00:45:22.540 getting

00:45:22.920 ready

00:45:23.160 for

00:45:23.320 this

00:45:23.460 there's

00:45:24.040 a

00:45:24.140 political

00:45:24.460 term

00:45:24.760 for

00:45:24.900 this

00:45:25.120 what do

00:45:25.700 they

00:45:25.780 call

00:45:26.000 it

00:45:26.120 when

00:45:26.380 let's

00:45:27.040 say

00:45:27.200 if

00:45:27.400 Feinstein

00:45:28.200 either

00:45:29.260 retires

00:45:29.820 or is

00:45:30.260 moved

00:45:30.460 from

00:45:30.660 office

00:45:31.100 and

00:45:31.780 then

00:45:32.140 Alan

00:45:33.020 Schiff

00:45:33.420 or

00:45:34.500 Adam

00:45:34.760 Schiff

00:45:35.040 becomes

00:45:36.040 appointed

00:45:36.540 what

00:45:37.900 is that

00:45:38.340 called

00:45:38.640 there's

00:45:40.220 a word

00:45:40.480 for it

00:45:41.440 if

00:45:42.440 Feinstein

00:45:43.320 retired

00:45:44.140 like

00:45:44.460 before

00:45:44.720 the

00:45:44.880 end

00:45:44.980 of

00:45:45.060 her

00:45:45.160 term

00:45:45.460 and

00:45:46.080 then

00:45:46.260 Gavin

00:45:46.620 Newsom

00:45:47.160 no

00:45:48.420 there's

00:45:48.600 a

00:45:48.700 word

00:45:48.840 for it

00:45:49.280 the

00:45:49.520 word

00:45:49.680 the

00:45:51.380 word

00:45:51.540 is

00:45:51.720 it's

00:45:51.940 a

00:45:52.060 lateral

00:45:52.360 move

00:45:52.840 it's

00:45:53.520 a

00:45:53.640 lateral

00:45:53.940 move

00:45:54.380 if

00:45:55.600 the

00:45:55.760 one

00:45:55.940 who

00:45:56.080 is

00:45:56.200 brain 1.00

00:45:56.500 dead 0.94

00:45:56.720 leaves

00:45:57.060 and

00:45:57.180 they

00:45:57.300 put

00:45:57.460 in

00:45:57.620 Adam

00:45:57.940 Schiff

00:45:58.140 that's

00:45:58.380 called

00:45:58.640 the

00:45:59.240 political

00:45:59.580 term

00:45:59.880 is

00:46:00.020 a

00:46:00.180 lateral

00:46:00.560 move

00:46:01.060 see

00:46:05.380 everything's

00:46:06.040 funny

00:46:06.320 they're

00:46:08.220 actually

00:46:08.660 looking

00:46:09.020 to

00:46:09.260 replace

00:46:09.860 Feinstein

00:46:11.600 with

00:46:12.360 Adam

00:46:12.700 Schiff

00:46:13.080 and

00:46:14.420 honest

00:46:14.880 to

00:46:15.060 God

00:46:15.280 that

00:46:15.460 looks

00:46:15.660 like

00:46:15.840 a

00:46:15.980 lateral

00:46:16.240 move

00:46:16.600 to

00:46:16.740 me

00:46:16.960 how

00:46:18.320 can

00:46:18.480 it

00:46:18.580 be

00:46:18.720 worse

00:46:19.080 the

00:46:20.840 only

00:46:21.360 way

00:46:21.560 it's

00:46:21.680 worse

00:46:21.920 is

00:46:22.100 they

00:46:22.240 found

00:46:22.460 somebody

00:46:22.800 who's

00:46:22.960 brain 0.95

00:46:23.260 dead 0.52

00:46:23.460 who

00:46:23.600 still

00:46:23.820 talks

00:46:24.340 they

00:46:25.760 got

00:46:25.900 somebody

00:46:26.200 who's

00:46:26.380 brain 0.95

00:46:26.620 dead 0.52

00:46:26.820 who

00:46:26.980 doesn't

00:46:27.220 talk

00:46:27.460 so

00:46:27.640 much

00:46:27.940 so

00:46:28.740 I

00:46:28.840 need

00:46:29.000 a 0.99

00:46:29.120 brain 1.00

00:46:29.340 dead 0.97

00:46:29.520 person

00:46:29.840 who

00:46:30.000 talks

00:46:30.400 like

00:46:30.940 well

00:46:31.400 it

00:46:31.940 feels

00:46:32.200 like

00:46:32.400 an

00:46:32.500 upgrade

00:46:32.800 all

00:46:34.520 right

00:46:34.760 did

00:46:39.720 you

00:46:39.900 see

00:46:40.180 that

00:46:40.500 you

00:46:41.200 all

00:46:41.460 saw

00:46:41.760 probably

00:46:42.420 the

00:46:42.660 viral

00:46:42.980 video

00:46:43.380 that's

00:46:43.700 not

00:46:43.920 on

00:46:44.080 the

00:46:44.200 news

00:46:44.580 but

00:46:45.660 all

00:46:45.900 over

00:46:46.180 Twitter

00:46:46.600 of

00:46:47.080 two

00:46:48.000 young

00:46:48.840 men

00:46:49.540 who

00:46:49.900 murdered

00:46:50.380 a

00:46:50.680 guy

00:46:50.880 on

00:46:51.040 a

00:46:51.180 bicycle

00:46:51.600 intentionally

00:46:53.600 you can

00:46:54.160 see the

00:46:54.540 whole

00:46:54.840 thing

00:46:55.020 developing

00:46:55.480 as

00:46:55.760 they're

00:46:55.880 talking

00:46:56.160 about

00:46:56.400 it

00:46:56.500 in

00:46:56.580 the

00:46:56.680 car

00:46:56.940 and

00:46:57.220 as

00:46:57.380 they

00:46:57.500 target

00:46:57.800 him 0.69

00:46:58.020 and 1.00

00:46:58.280 kill 1.00

00:46:58.520 him 1.00

00:46:58.740 and

00:46:59.520 he

00:46:59.660 turned

00:47:00.100 out

00:47:00.280 to

00:47:00.380 be

00:47:00.540 a

00:47:00.720 retired

00:47:01.140 ex

00:47:01.620 police

00:47:02.020 chief

00:47:02.380 the

00:47:04.880 Las

00:47:05.140 Vegas

00:47:05.460 Review

00:47:05.900 Journal

00:47:06.340 their

00:47:07.440 headline

00:47:07.860 the way

00:47:08.820 they

00:47:08.960 described

00:47:09.380 it

00:47:09.520 was

00:47:09.740 that

00:47:09.900 he

00:47:10.040 was

00:47:10.240 killed

00:47:10.560 in

00:47:10.720 a

00:47:10.840 bike

00:47:11.040 crash

00:47:11.500 he 0.66

00:47:12.980 was

00:47:13.120 killed

00:47:13.400 in

00:47:13.560 a

00:47:13.660 bike

00:47:13.840 crash

00:47:14.220 they

00:47:16.700 didn't

00:47:17.000 say

00:47:17.300 two

00:47:18.200 young

00:47:18.480 black

00:47:18.820 men 0.98

00:47:19.240 targeted

00:47:19.960 him

00:47:20.380 and 0.86

00:47:21.140 murdered 0.99

00:47:21.420 him

00:47:21.740 which

00:47:22.740 is

00:47:22.880 actually

00:47:23.140 what

00:47:23.340 happened

00:47:23.720 but

00:47:25.240 is

00:47:26.240 the

00:47:26.540 fact

00:47:26.980 that

00:47:27.180 they

00:47:27.320 were 0.77

00:47:27.480 black

00:47:27.860 important

00:47:28.340 to

00:47:28.580 the

00:47:28.700 story

00:47:29.000 no

00:47:31.520 because

00:47:32.980 individuals

00:47:33.760 are

00:47:34.260 infinitely

00:47:34.880 different

00:47:35.380 as

00:47:37.200 soon

00:47:37.380 as

00:47:37.520 you

00:47:37.620 buy

00:47:37.880 into

00:47:38.140 the

00:47:38.480 narrative

00:47:39.360 that

00:47:39.740 there's

00:47:40.020 like

00:47:40.240 an

00:47:40.380 average

00:47:40.680 black

00:47:40.980 person

00:47:41.360 and

00:47:42.380 you

00:47:42.520 should

00:47:42.700 compare

00:47:43.000 that

00:47:43.220 to

00:47:43.360 the

00:47:43.480 average

00:47:43.760 white

00:47:44.000 person 0.52

00:47:44.360 you

00:47:45.620 you're

00:47:45.880 already

00:47:46.140 gone

00:47:46.540 they

00:47:47.080 already

00:47:47.300 got

00:47:47.580 you

00:47:47.740 don't

00:47:48.940 ever

00:47:49.180 buy

00:47:49.400 into

00:47:49.600 the

00:47:49.760 narrative

00:47:50.080 that

00:47:50.660 comparing

00:47:51.040 the

00:47:51.260 average

00:47:51.600 of

00:47:51.780 any

00:47:51.940 two

00:47:52.160 groups

00:47:52.620 gets

00:47:53.380 you

00:47:53.580 anything

00:47:54.140 except

00:47:54.560 cancelled

00:47:55.020 that's

00:47:56.540 all

00:47:56.680 you're

00:47:56.880 going

00:47:56.980 to

00:47:57.060 get

00:47:57.320 rather

00:47:58.860 you

00:47:59.240 should

00:47:59.400 say

00:47:59.700 there

00:48:00.420 are

00:48:00.520 two

00:48:00.700 individuals

00:48:01.260 that are

00:48:01.720 such

00:48:01.920 horrible 0.79

00:48:02.280 people

00:48:02.700 we

00:48:03.440 would

00:48:03.620 all

00:48:03.800 like

00:48:03.980 to

00:48:04.120 see

00:48:04.280 them 0.99

00:48:04.500 murdered

00:48:04.760 in

00:48:05.000 a

00:48:05.140 terrible

00:48:05.380 way

00:48:05.680 okay

00:48:06.800 not

00:48:07.080 all

00:48:07.300 of

00:48:07.420 us

00:48:07.620 but

00:48:07.840 I

00:48:07.980 would

00:48:08.240 I'd

00:48:08.620 like

00:48:08.760 to

00:48:08.880 see

00:48:09.000 them

00:48:09.140 get 1.00

00:48:09.300 murdered 1.00

00:48:09.640 because 0.62

00:48:11.060 they're

00:48:11.200 terrible 0.96

00:48:11.560 terrible

00:48:11.860 people

00:48:12.280 which

00:48:13.200 has

00:48:13.380 nothing

00:48:13.640 to do

00:48:13.960 with

00:48:14.080 their

00:48:14.220 DNA

00:48:14.560 but

00:48:16.800 it

00:48:16.940 might

00:48:17.080 have

00:48:17.260 something

00:48:17.540 to

00:48:17.780 do

00:48:17.920 with

00:48:18.100 the

00:48:18.320 way

00:48:19.180 the

00:48:19.380 news

00:48:19.780 is

00:48:19.960 being

00:48:20.140 presented

00:48:20.500 to

00:48:20.700 all

00:48:20.840 of

00:48:20.960 us

00:48:21.140 that

00:48:21.440 may

00:48:21.780 devalue

00:48:23.460 some

00:48:23.780 people's

00:48:24.240 lives

00:48:24.600 more

00:48:24.900 than

00:48:25.080 others

00:48:25.440 some

00:48:26.180 people's

00:48:26.600 lives

00:48:26.860 may

00:48:27.120 be

00:48:27.280 devalued

00:48:27.920 by

00:48:28.740 the

00:48:28.940 news

00:48:29.280 so

00:48:30.280 that's

00:48:30.520 important

00:48:30.860 to

00:48:31.040 know

00:48:31.240 but

00:48:31.900 what's

00:48:32.120 not

00:48:32.300 important

00:48:32.600 to

00:48:32.780 know

00:48:32.980 is

00:48:34.240 that

00:48:34.480 there

00:48:34.660 were

00:48:34.780 two

00:48:34.960 terrible

00:48:35.300 people

00:48:35.740 but

00:48:36.980 the

00:48:37.140 Las

00:48:37.340 Vegas

00:48:37.620 Review

00:48:38.000 Journal

00:48:38.320 is

00:48:38.820 a

00:48:39.040 newspaper

00:48:39.520 and

00:48:40.900 when

00:48:41.120 they

00:48:41.340 completely

00:48:41.820 hide

00:48:42.180 the

00:48:42.360 news

00:48:42.740 by

00:48:43.100 calling

00:48:43.380 it 1.00

00:48:43.560 killed

00:48:43.820 in

00:48:43.980 a

00:48:44.060 bike

00:48:44.220 crash

00:48:44.620 but

00:48:44.900 yet

00:48:45.120 I'm

00:48:45.400 sure

00:48:45.540 they

00:48:45.700 made

00:48:45.860 a

00:48:45.960 big

00:48:46.100 deal

00:48:46.280 about

00:48:46.520 George

00:48:46.840 Floyd

00:48:47.160 I don't

00:48:47.560 have

00:48:48.100 to

00:48:48.240 check

00:48:48.560 of

00:48:48.800 course

00:48:49.000 they

00:48:49.140 did

00:48:49.340 people

00:48:51.880 ask

00:48:52.200 me

00:48:52.440 Scott

00:48:52.920 how

00:48:54.240 do

00:48:54.360 you

00:48:54.460 feel

00:48:54.700 now

00:48:54.960 that

00:48:55.120 you're

00:48:55.280 no

00:48:55.440 longer

00:48:55.720 associated

00:48:56.280 with

00:48:56.540 the

00:48:56.680 newspaper

00:48:57.100 industry

00:48:57.620 well

00:48:59.940 let me

00:49:00.300 tell

00:49:00.460 you

00:49:00.560 how

00:49:00.720 would

00:49:00.860 you

00:49:01.000 feel

00:49:01.280 the

00:49:02.300 newspaper

00:49:02.960 industry

00:49:03.480 just

00:49:03.980 referred

00:49:04.520 to

00:49:04.720 this

00:49:04.920 as

00:49:05.180 somebody

00:49:06.020 killed

00:49:06.440 in

00:49:06.600 a

00:49:06.720 bike

00:49:06.900 crash

00:49:07.260 how

00:49:08.460 would

00:49:08.660 you

00:49:08.840 feel

00:49:09.180 if

00:49:09.600 you

00:49:09.720 were

00:49:09.840 no

00:49:10.020 longer

00:49:10.380 associated

00:49:11.000 with

00:49:11.300 them 1.00

00:49:11.500 fucking 1.00

00:49:14.240 good 0.99

00:49:14.660 like

00:49:15.760 really

00:49:16.080 good

00:49:16.420 like

00:49:17.320 really

00:49:17.800 really

00:49:18.280 really

00:49:18.660 good

00:49:19.100 I gotta

00:49:19.860 tell

00:49:20.120 you

00:49:20.300 it

00:49:20.480 was

00:49:20.640 a

00:49:20.820 struggle

00:49:21.160 to

00:49:22.300 have

00:49:22.520 the

00:49:22.740 Washington

00:49:23.160 Post

00:49:23.500 carry

00:49:23.960 my

00:49:24.460 comic

00:49:24.960 because

00:49:26.360 I didn't

00:49:26.860 want to

00:49:27.080 make

00:49:27.260 waves

00:49:27.640 I mean

00:49:28.840 I was

00:49:29.120 criticizing

00:49:29.700 the

00:49:29.940 Washington

00:49:30.180 Post

00:49:30.500 pretty

00:49:32.780 vigorously

00:49:33.460 the entire

00:49:34.340 time

00:49:34.780 so I

00:49:35.400 knew

00:49:35.560 my time

00:49:36.360 in the

00:49:36.620 Washington

00:49:36.900 Post

00:49:37.160 was

00:49:37.400 limited

00:49:37.740 I

00:49:38.480 didn't

00:49:38.680 know

00:49:38.820 that

00:49:38.980 they

00:49:39.120 would

00:49:39.220 all

00:49:39.420 cancel

00:49:39.880 me

00:49:40.020 at

00:49:40.100 the

00:49:40.220 same

00:49:40.400 time

00:49:40.720 but

00:49:41.280 I

00:49:41.380 knew

00:49:41.500 the

00:49:41.640 Washington

00:49:41.900 Post

00:49:42.200 would

00:49:42.560 have

00:49:42.760 to

00:49:42.900 get rid

00:49:43.200 of 0.59

00:49:43.280 me

00:49:43.400 they

00:49:44.140 just

00:49:44.340 needed

00:49:44.580 to

00:49:44.780 do

00:49:44.900 it

00:49:45.040 undercover

00:49:45.560 of

00:49:45.920 everybody

00:49:46.240 else

00:49:46.500 doing

00:49:46.720 it

00:49:46.840 at

00:49:46.940 the

00:49:47.060 same

00:49:47.240 time

00:49:47.560 but

00:49:48.020 obviously

00:49:48.380 they

00:49:48.600 had

00:49:48.720 to

00:49:48.820 get rid

00:49:49.080 of 0.59

00:49:49.160 me

00:49:49.360 so

00:49:51.780 yeah

00:49:51.960 I

00:49:52.080 feel

00:49:52.200 pretty

00:49:52.420 good

00:49:52.640 about

00:49:52.840 not

00:49:53.060 being

00:49:53.260 part

00:49:53.680 of

00:49:53.780 that

00:49:54.180 I

00:49:57.740 guess

00:49:58.040 meet

00:49:58.660 the

00:49:58.820 press

00:49:59.220 did

00:50:00.640 a

00:50:00.980 interview

00:50:01.540 with

00:50:01.940 Trump

00:50:02.740 that's

00:50:03.700 pre-taped

00:50:04.280 does that

00:50:05.200 mean

00:50:05.340 we'll

00:50:05.540 see

00:50:05.740 that

00:50:05.940 today

00:50:06.260 are

00:50:07.220 we

00:50:07.340 going

00:50:07.440 to

00:50:07.520 see

00:50:07.660 Trump

00:50:07.960 on

00:50:08.180 meet

00:50:08.380 the

00:50:08.520 press

00:50:08.800 well

00:50:11.180 here's

00:50:11.500 what

00:50:11.760 Jane 0.58

00:50:12.280 Powers

00:50:12.680 writes

00:50:13.080 on

00:50:13.340 X

00:50:13.660 Jane 0.58

00:50:14.080 must

00:50:15.140 be

00:50:15.300 a

00:50:15.420 Democrat

00:50:15.840 just

00:50:16.220 guessing

00:50:16.540 she

00:50:17.620 tweets

00:50:17.920 this

00:50:18.240 hey

00:50:18.600 NBC

00:50:19.040 news

00:50:19.600 and

00:50:20.700 meet

00:50:20.920 the

00:50:21.060 press

00:50:21.340 pull

00:50:22.080 the

00:50:22.280 plug

00:50:22.620 on

00:50:22.840 the

00:50:23.000 disastrous

00:50:23.580 Trump

00:50:24.060 interview

00:50:24.460 if

00:50:25.120 it's

00:50:25.360 pre-taped

00:50:25.960 just

00:50:26.540 don't

00:50:26.860 air

00:50:27.080 it

00:50:27.260 so

00:50:27.460 in

00:50:27.560 other

00:50:27.720 words

00:50:28.020 Jane 0.58

00:50:29.000 has

00:50:29.180 not

00:50:29.360 seen

00:50:30.640 the

00:50:31.500 interview

00:50:31.800 but

00:50:33.220 if

00:50:34.060 it's

00:50:34.220 pre-taped

00:50:34.760 it's

00:50:35.480 disastrous

00:50:36.080 and

00:50:36.480 it

00:50:36.580 should

00:50:36.680 be

00:50:36.860 pulled

00:50:37.180 it

00:50:38.640 is

00:50:38.800 awful

00:50:39.220 and

00:50:39.880 I

00:50:40.000 guess

00:50:40.140 the

00:50:40.280 new

00:50:40.440 host

00:50:40.700 is

00:50:40.840 named

00:50:41.020 Welker

00:50:41.400 it

00:50:41.980 is

00:50:42.100 awful

00:50:42.400 and

00:50:42.640 Welker

00:50:43.020 ought

00:50:43.320 to

00:50:43.440 be

00:50:43.580 ashamed

00:50:44.000 of

00:50:44.180 herself

00:50:44.680 boycott

00:50:45.840 meet

00:50:46.080 the

00:50:46.240 press

00:50:46.620 so

00:50:48.820 the

00:50:49.900 Democrats

00:50:50.540 literally

00:50:51.840 don't

00:50:52.320 even

00:50:52.560 want

00:50:52.880 news

00:50:53.380 they

00:50:55.200 don't

00:50:55.500 want

00:50:55.700 the

00:50:55.860 news

00:50:56.120 to

00:50:56.320 do

00:50:56.480 the

00:50:56.660 news

00:50:57.040 and

00:50:57.880 they

00:50:58.040 say

00:50:58.480 it

00:50:58.620 kind

00:50:58.840 of

00:50:58.960 directly

00:50:59.340 now

00:50:59.680 that

00:51:00.500 you

00:51:00.660 can't

00:51:00.980 even

00:51:01.260 listen

00:51:01.700 to

00:51:02.160 Trump

00:51:02.480 that

00:51:03.580 the

00:51:03.760 problem

00:51:04.060 is

00:51:04.260 freedom

00:51:04.580 of

00:51:05.260 speech

00:51:05.580 itself

00:51:06.080 if

00:51:07.320 you

00:51:07.420 have

00:51:07.560 freedom

00:51:07.860 of

00:51:08.020 speech

00:51:08.460 and

00:51:09.180 a

00:51:09.300 free

00:51:09.480 press

00:51:09.940 those

00:51:11.040 things

00:51:11.520 are

00:51:11.840 considered

00:51:12.520 threatening

00:51:13.080 to the

00:51:13.500 left

00:51:13.780 freedom

00:51:14.880 of speech

00:51:15.460 and free

00:51:16.180 press

00:51:16.580 are

00:51:17.520 threats

00:51:18.180 to the

00:51:18.800 left

00:51:19.080 but

00:51:20.100 they

00:51:20.280 know

00:51:20.520 it

00:51:20.760 I'll

00:51:21.480 give

00:51:21.620 them

00:51:21.780 credit

00:51:22.080 they

00:51:22.360 know

00:51:22.580 that

00:51:22.760 if

00:51:22.900 they

00:51:23.020 don't

00:51:23.220 control

00:51:23.600 the

00:51:23.780 media

00:51:24.080 they

00:51:25.540 lose

00:51:26.200 because

00:51:27.820 the

00:51:28.040 narrative

00:51:28.460 is

00:51:28.680 not

00:51:28.880 going

00:51:29.000 to

00:51:29.100 support

00:51:29.500 the 1.00

00:51:30.440 ridiculous 0.94

00:51:30.840 things 0.99

00:51:31.280 that

00:51:31.480 they're

00:51:31.660 claiming

00:51:32.120 and

00:51:32.400 acting

00:51:32.780 on

00:51:33.020 so

00:51:34.660 let's

00:51:36.840 see

00:51:37.060 if there

00:51:37.700 are

00:51:37.760 any

00:51:37.900 other

00:51:38.220 situations

00:51:39.220 like

00:51:39.560 that

00:51:39.900 let's

00:51:43.920 see

00:51:44.140 is there

00:51:44.480 any

00:51:44.700 other

00:51:44.940 situation

00:51:45.500 in which

00:51:45.920 Democrats

00:51:46.520 are trying

00:51:46.940 to

00:51:47.180 squelch

00:51:47.880 free

00:51:49.180 speech

00:51:49.740 and

00:51:50.420 the

00:51:50.700 news

00:51:51.540 well

00:51:52.380 there's

00:51:52.680 the

00:51:52.860 Russell

00:51:53.140 Brand

00:51:53.420 situation

00:51:53.980 which

00:51:54.860 you

00:51:55.000 could

00:51:55.160 say

00:51:55.520 oh

00:51:55.860 that's

00:51:56.200 not

00:51:56.360 about

00:51:56.560 that

00:51:56.800 that's

00:51:57.080 about

00:51:57.280 his

00:51:57.420 behavior

00:51:57.900 but

00:51:58.700 interestingly

00:51:59.260 his

00:51:59.620 behavior

00:52:00.040 didn't

00:52:00.420 matter

00:52:00.660 to

00:52:00.860 anybody

00:52:01.320 until

00:52:02.220 he

00:52:02.440 became

00:52:02.900 well

00:52:03.340 known

00:52:03.660 for

00:52:04.120 debunking

00:52:04.920 the

00:52:05.060 mainstream

00:52:05.380 media

00:52:05.780 narrative

00:52:06.240 but

00:52:07.640 now

00:52:07.820 suddenly

00:52:08.180 his

00:52:08.500 past

00:52:09.140 behavior

00:52:09.560 is

00:52:09.820 very

00:52:10.280 sketchy

00:52:10.920 and

00:52:11.640 now

00:52:11.960 we've

00:52:12.220 got

00:52:12.280 to

00:52:12.380 do

00:52:12.500 something

00:52:12.800 so

00:52:13.600 does

00:52:13.940 this

00:52:14.160 look

00:52:14.400 like

00:52:14.720 a

00:52:15.480 normal

00:52:16.200 progression

00:52:16.880 of

00:52:17.380 the

00:52:17.640 legal

00:52:17.940 system

00:52:18.380 or

00:52:19.620 does

00:52:19.880 it

00:52:20.020 look

00:52:20.200 like

00:52:20.500 an

00:52:20.680 attempt

00:52:21.000 to

00:52:21.360 reduce

00:52:21.800 free

00:52:22.180 speech

00:52:22.640 could

00:52:24.380 be

00:52:24.560 both

00:52:24.960 but

00:52:25.740 at

00:52:25.880 the

00:52:26.000 very

00:52:26.160 least

00:52:26.620 it

00:52:27.920 would

00:52:28.120 decrease

00:52:28.560 free

00:52:28.840 speech

00:52:29.240 what

00:52:31.620 about

00:52:31.920 Tucker

00:52:32.480 Carlson

00:52:32.940 getting

00:52:33.200 fired

00:52:33.560 from

00:52:33.920 Fox

00:52:34.440 do

00:52:35.400 you

00:52:35.560 think

00:52:35.780 that

00:52:36.040 was

00:52:36.740 a

00:52:39.700 way

00:52:39.860 to

00:52:40.060 reduce

00:52:40.400 free

00:52:40.680 speech

00:52:41.120 of

00:52:42.160 course

00:52:42.380 it

00:52:42.540 was

00:52:42.840 it

00:52:43.600 may

00:52:43.720 not

00:52:43.920 work

00:52:44.160 out

00:52:44.540 but

00:52:45.260 that's

00:52:45.460 what

00:52:45.600 it

00:52:45.700 was

00:52:46.100 what

00:52:46.860 about

00:52:47.060 Assange

00:52:47.620 Assange

00:52:49.200 in

00:52:49.380 jail

00:52:49.640 that's

00:52:50.620 about

00:52:50.820 free

00:52:51.100 speech

00:52:51.420 but

00:52:51.620 Republicans

00:52:52.120 like

00:52:52.480 that

00:52:52.680 too

00:52:52.980 Assange

00:52:54.020 is

00:52:54.180 in

00:52:54.340 jail

00:52:54.520 because

00:52:54.940 even

00:52:55.540 Trump

00:52:56.240 thought

00:52:56.520 he

00:52:56.640 should

00:52:56.760 be

00:52:56.880 in

00:52:57.020 jail

00:52:57.200 so

00:52:57.960 I'm

00:52:58.080 not

00:52:58.200 going

00:52:58.300 to

00:52:58.380 use

00:52:58.580 him

00:52:58.820 how

00:52:59.760 about

00:53:00.100 the

00:53:01.400 ADL

00:53:02.020 trying

00:53:02.300 to

00:53:02.500 destroy

00:53:02.880 the

00:53:03.080 business

00:53:03.440 model

00:53:03.840 of

00:53:04.300 Twitter

00:53:04.740 now

00:53:05.180 X

00:53:05.600 because

00:53:06.640 Twitter

00:53:07.200 was

00:53:07.440 going

00:53:07.580 to

00:53:07.620 be

00:53:07.720 a

00:53:07.840 free

00:53:08.020 speech

00:53:08.400 platform

00:53:08.960 does

00:53:09.860 that

00:53:10.000 look

00:53:10.200 like

00:53:10.400 somebody

00:53:10.720 is

00:53:10.860 afraid

00:53:11.120 of

00:53:11.260 free

00:53:11.440 speech

00:53:11.800 well

00:53:13.120 the

00:53:13.360 story

00:53:13.640 would

00:53:13.840 be

00:53:14.020 that

00:53:14.280 there's

00:53:14.560 too

00:53:14.720 much

00:53:14.920 hate

00:53:15.240 and

00:53:15.440 anti

00:53:15.800 semitism

00:53:16.400 but

00:53:16.580 the

00:53:16.740 data

00:53:16.960 doesn't

00:53:17.340 show

00:53:17.540 that

00:53:17.840 so

00:53:18.940 it's

00:53:19.200 interesting

00:53:19.580 there's

00:53:19.920 always

00:53:20.100 a

00:53:20.260 cover

00:53:20.460 story

00:53:20.780 isn't

00:53:21.020 there

00:53:21.240 no

00:53:21.820 we're

00:53:21.960 not

00:53:22.140 trying

00:53:22.400 to

00:53:22.660 stop

00:53:24.980 Russell

00:53:25.360 Brand

00:53:25.640 from

00:53:25.840 speaking

00:53:26.280 he

00:53:27.420 just

00:53:27.660 did

00:53:27.880 some

00:53:28.080 bad 0.94

00:53:28.340 sex

00:53:28.660 things

00:53:28.920 we

00:53:29.120 think

00:53:29.400 years

00:53:29.680 ago

00:53:29.920 that's

00:53:31.040 what

00:53:31.160 we

00:53:31.320 care

00:53:31.480 about

00:53:31.760 no

00:53:32.760 no

00:53:32.940 Tucker

00:53:33.440 Tucker

00:53:33.920 Carlson

00:53:34.320 is

00:53:34.440 not

00:53:34.640 being

00:53:34.820 removed

00:53:35.160 from

00:53:35.340 the

00:53:35.460 air

00:53:35.600 because

00:53:35.880 he's

00:53:36.120 effective

00:53:36.460 no

00:53:36.860 it's

00:53:37.480 not

00:53:37.640 about

00:53:38.360 free

00:53:38.600 speech

00:53:39.300 no

00:53:40.160 it's

00:53:40.840 because

00:53:41.160 he

00:53:41.700 said

00:53:41.960 some

00:53:42.200 things

00:53:42.540 that

00:53:43.380 were

00:53:43.640 not

00:53:43.940 true

00:53:44.360 about

00:53:45.180 an

00:53:45.360 election

00:53:45.700 we

00:53:46.280 think

00:53:46.640 and

00:53:46.880 we

00:53:46.980 got

00:53:47.100 sued

00:53:47.400 and

00:53:47.520 it

00:53:47.600 cost

00:53:47.820 us

00:53:47.980 a lot

00:53:48.160 of

00:53:48.240 money

00:53:48.420 and

00:53:48.540 that's

00:53:48.720 the

00:53:48.840 reason

00:53:49.080 and

00:53:50.560 what

00:53:52.840 about

00:53:53.160 the

00:53:54.320 gag

00:53:54.880 order

00:53:55.200 on

00:53:55.680 Trump

00:53:56.080 from

00:53:56.940 Smith

00:53:58.440 the

00:53:58.700 prosecutor

00:53:59.200 do you

00:54:00.020 think

00:54:00.180 the gag

00:54:00.720 order

00:54:01.040 on

00:54:01.300 Trump

00:54:01.660 who

00:54:01.880 is

00:54:02.000 running

00:54:02.300 for

00:54:02.520 president

00:54:03.000 whose

00:54:03.960 primary

00:54:04.620 strongest

00:54:07.020 focus

00:54:07.780 is

00:54:08.700 the

00:54:09.000 weaponization

00:54:09.660 of the

00:54:10.040 government

00:54:10.500 so

00:54:11.440 the

00:54:11.620 weaponized

00:54:12.100 government

00:54:12.520 told them

00:54:13.060 to shut 0.99

00:54:13.480 up 0.97

00:54:13.680 about

00:54:13.940 talking

00:54:14.260 about

00:54:14.480 the

00:54:14.640 weaponized

00:54:15.120 government

00:54:15.620 does

00:54:16.360 it

00:54:16.500 sound

00:54:16.700 like

00:54:16.940 they

00:54:17.100 did

00:54:17.280 that

00:54:17.540 strictly

00:54:18.000 for

00:54:18.480 good

00:54:19.400 legal

00:54:19.900 hygiene

00:54:20.420 because

00:54:21.240 sometimes

00:54:21.600 you need

00:54:22.040 to ask

00:54:22.520 people

00:54:22.780 not

00:54:23.020 to

00:54:23.200 talk

00:54:23.540 it's

00:54:24.240 part

00:54:24.440 of

00:54:24.540 making

00:54:25.500 sure

00:54:25.720 the

00:54:25.860 process

00:54:26.220 is

00:54:26.620 credible

00:54:27.180 but

00:54:28.200 do you

00:54:28.360 think

00:54:28.480 that's

00:54:28.720 why

00:54:28.840 they

00:54:29.020 did

00:54:29.220 it

00:54:29.440 or

00:54:30.280 do

00:54:30.400 you

00:54:30.460 think

00:54:30.680 they

00:54:31.000 just

00:54:31.200 wanted

00:54:31.440 to

00:54:31.560 limit

00:54:31.740 his

00:54:31.940 free

00:54:32.160 speech

00:54:32.580 because

00:54:32.880 what he

00:54:33.160 would

00:54:33.280 say

00:54:33.520 would

00:54:33.860 be

00:54:34.120 inconvenient

00:54:34.680 for

00:54:34.980 them

00:54:35.240 what

00:54:36.360 about

00:54:36.740 representative

00:54:38.740 Boebert

00:54:39.300 do you

00:54:40.700 think

00:54:40.900 the

00:54:41.080 problem

00:54:41.380 is

00:54:41.680 that

00:54:42.060 she

00:54:42.580 was

00:54:43.000 vaping

00:54:43.640 and

00:54:43.780 making

00:54:44.000 some

00:54:44.260 noise

00:54:44.540 in the

00:54:44.780 theater

00:54:45.040 or

00:54:46.560 do you

00:54:46.800 think

00:54:46.980 maybe

00:54:47.240 she

00:54:47.480 says

00:54:47.820 things

00:54:48.180 that

00:54:48.400 some

00:54:49.400 people

00:54:49.660 don't

00:54:49.900 want

00:54:50.060 to

00:54:50.120 hear

00:54:50.320 what

00:54:51.900 about

00:54:52.280 Kristi

00:54:53.300 Noem

00:54:53.680 and

00:54:54.020 Corey

00:54:54.500 Lewandowski

00:54:55.240 do you

00:54:57.060 think

00:54:57.280 nobody

00:54:57.700 knew

00:54:58.080 that

00:54:58.380 they

00:54:58.540 were

00:54:58.740 up

00:54:58.980 to

00:54:59.120 something

00:54:59.440 for

00:54:59.740 a

00:54:59.900 long

00:55:00.080 time

00:55:00.380 do you

00:55:01.660 think

00:55:01.860 that

00:55:02.060 the

00:55:02.240 reason

00:55:02.600 that

00:55:02.820 now

00:55:03.060 we're

00:55:03.240 looking

00:55:03.500 at

00:55:03.700 it

00:55:03.800 is

00:55:03.960 because

00:55:04.340 oh

00:55:04.740 hypocrisy

00:55:05.420 is

00:55:05.620 bad

00:55:06.020 and

00:55:06.260 is

00:55:06.860 that

00:55:06.980 why

00:55:07.140 we're

00:55:07.300 looking

00:55:07.480 at

00:55:07.700 it

00:55:07.800 now

00:55:08.020 nope

00:55:09.220 it's

00:55:10.080 to

00:55:10.260 shut

00:55:10.620 them

00:55:10.740 the 1.00

00:55:10.900 fuck 1.00

00:55:11.120 up 0.99

00:55:11.600 how

00:55:14.580 about

00:55:14.760 me

00:55:15.020 I

00:55:16.220 got

00:55:16.420 canceled

00:55:16.800 by

00:55:17.140 all

00:55:17.480 the

00:55:17.640 Democrats

00:55:18.100 and

00:55:18.340 none

00:55:18.540 of

00:55:18.660 the

00:55:18.780 Republicans

00:55:19.220 is

00:55:20.460 it

00:55:20.580 because

00:55:20.840 the

00:55:21.040 thing

00:55:21.260 I

00:55:21.440 said

00:55:21.720 was

00:55:22.060 so

00:55:22.540 awful

00:55:23.440 well

00:55:24.520 the

00:55:24.680 thing

00:55:24.860 I

00:55:25.000 said

00:55:25.140 was

00:55:25.400 awful

00:55:25.720 it

00:55:26.060 was

00:55:26.180 designed

00:55:26.540 to

00:55:26.700 be

00:55:26.820 awful

00:55:27.080 but 0.99

00:55:28.340 you

00:55:28.780 know

00:55:28.920 of

00:55:29.100 the

00:55:29.400 point

00:55:29.660 of

00:55:29.780 it

00:55:29.880 was

00:55:30.020 to

00:55:30.160 be

00:55:30.280 awful

00:55:30.580 so

00:55:31.200 of

00:55:31.360 course

00:55:31.500 it

00:55:31.620 was

00:55:31.720 awful

00:55:32.040 but

00:55:33.760 do

00:55:33.840 you

00:55:33.920 think

00:55:34.040 that's

00:55:34.280 why

00:55:34.420 I

00:55:34.540 got

00:55:34.660 canceled

00:55:35.000 do

00:55:38.480 you

00:55:38.540 think

00:55:38.700 that's

00:55:38.960 why

00:55:39.220 probably

00:55:40.600 not

00:55:40.980 probably

00:55:42.960 if I

00:55:43.300 had

00:55:43.400 been

00:55:43.540 black

00:55:43.960 I

00:55:44.660 could

00:55:44.780 have

00:55:44.880 said

00:55:45.040 anything

00:55:45.340 I

00:55:45.560 wanted

00:55:45.820 so

00:55:46.820 we

00:55:48.660 seem

00:55:48.920 to

00:55:49.060 be

00:55:49.260 in

00:55:49.500 a

00:55:49.780 situation

00:55:50.900 in

00:55:51.860 which

00:55:52.120 100%

00:55:53.080 of the

00:55:53.420 effort

00:55:53.760 on

00:55:54.100 the

00:55:54.240 left

00:55:54.520 is

00:55:54.940 to

00:55:55.320 prevent

00:55:56.000 you

00:55:56.300 from

00:55:56.500 knowing

00:55:56.740 the

00:55:56.920 news

00:55:57.280 the

00:55:57.960 entire

00:55:58.300 pandemic

00:55:58.860 was

00:55:59.240 an

00:55:59.380 exercise

00:55:59.780 in

00:56:00.120 preventing

00:56:00.580 you

00:56:00.940 from

00:56:01.160 knowing

00:56:01.440 what

00:56:01.660 was

00:56:01.880 true

00:56:02.160 the

00:56:03.140 Ukraine

00:56:03.560 war

00:56:03.900 is

00:56:04.140 a

00:56:04.280 huge

00:56:04.560 exercise

00:56:05.060 in

00:56:05.440 preventing

00:56:05.900 you

00:56:06.220 from

00:56:06.440 knowing

00:56:06.740 what's

00:56:07.100 true

00:56:07.420 the

00:56:08.240 fentanyl

00:56:09.220 whatever

00:56:10.920 fentanyl

00:56:11.620 stuff

00:56:11.900 we're

00:56:12.080 doing

00:56:12.380 is

00:56:12.940 clearly

00:56:13.260 not

00:56:13.580 real

00:56:13.900 in

00:56:14.740 the

00:56:14.900 sense

00:56:15.160 that

00:56:15.460 whatever

00:56:15.880 is

00:56:16.140 the

00:56:16.340 truth

00:56:16.760 we

00:56:17.340 are

00:56:17.500 prevented

00:56:17.920 from

00:56:18.300 knowing

00:56:18.660 whatever

00:56:20.140 is

00:56:20.500 the

00:56:20.700 situation

00:56:21.200 with

00:56:21.520 these 1.00

00:56:21.720 fucking 1.00

00:56:22.060 UFOs 1.00

00:56:22.940 were

00:56:24.500 prevented

00:56:25.120 from

00:56:25.420 knowing

00:56:25.720 the

00:56:26.260 UFO

00:56:26.700 story

00:56:27.180 is

00:56:27.500 not

00:56:27.740 about

00:56:28.140 getting

00:56:29.180 to

00:56:29.400 the

00:56:29.560 bottom

00:56:29.800 of

00:56:30.020 it

00:56:30.180 it's

00:56:30.760 literally

00:56:31.140 about

00:56:31.500 fooling

00:56:32.060 you

00:56:32.240 so

00:56:32.420 you

00:56:32.580 don't

00:56:32.760 see

00:56:32.960 the

00:56:33.140 real

00:56:33.360 news

00:56:33.780 right

00:56:34.960 everything

00:56:36.260 that's

00:56:36.640 happening

00:56:37.020 is an

00:56:37.820 effort

00:56:38.080 to take

00:56:38.520 away

00:56:38.780 your

00:56:39.060 information

00:56:39.640 and your

00:56:40.160 freedom

00:56:40.440 of

00:56:40.640 speech

00:56:40.980 everything

00:56:41.980 it's

00:56:42.800 just

00:56:42.960 that

00:56:43.200 everything

00:56:43.540 can

00:56:43.860 be

00:56:44.060 couched

00:56:44.480 as

00:56:44.640 a

00:56:44.760 different

00:56:44.980 thing

00:56:45.340 and

00:56:46.080 you

00:56:46.220 wouldn't

00:56:46.480 notice

00:56:46.840 until

00:56:47.140 you

00:56:47.320 saw

00:56:47.480 the

00:56:47.640 pattern

00:56:47.980 if

00:56:48.760 you

00:56:48.880 looked

00:56:49.080 at

00:56:49.200 any

00:56:49.420 one

00:56:49.640 of

00:56:49.760 these

00:56:49.920 stories

00:56:50.240 individually

00:56:50.840 you'd

00:56:51.140 say

00:56:51.320 well

00:56:52.100 leave

00:56:53.260 me

00:56:53.700 alone

00:56:53.960 Russell

00:56:54.280 Brand

00:56:54.560 did

00:56:54.740 some

00:56:54.880 bad

00:56:55.080 things

00:56:55.440 like

00:56:55.980 that's

00:56:56.420 the

00:56:56.500 whole

00:56:56.620 story

00:56:56.960 right

00:56:58.400 or

00:56:59.180 if

00:56:59.420 you

00:56:59.540 only

00:56:59.780 saw

00:57:00.000 Tucker

00:57:00.400 you

00:57:01.260 say

00:57:01.440 well

00:57:01.620 it was

00:57:01.800 just

00:57:01.960 a

00:57:02.080 business

00:57:02.380 decision

00:57:02.920 it was

00:57:03.840 a

00:57:03.940 business

00:57:04.240 decision

00:57:04.600 or

00:57:05.700 if

00:57:05.800 you

00:57:05.880 only

00:57:06.160 saw

00:57:06.420 me

00:57:06.720 you'd

00:57:07.900 say

00:57:08.160 well

00:57:08.780 look

00:57:09.060 what

00:57:09.180 he

00:57:09.280 said

00:57:09.620 and

00:57:10.300 look

00:57:10.520 what

00:57:10.660 he

00:57:10.760 said

00:57:11.060 obviously

00:57:11.960 right

00:57:12.920 and

00:57:13.320 if

00:57:13.460 you

00:57:13.560 didn't

00:57:13.740 know

00:57:13.960 that

00:57:14.200 it

00:57:14.560 was

00:57:14.660 only

00:57:14.860 Democrats

00:57:15.400 so

00:57:16.680 I

00:57:18.300 think

00:57:18.500 the

00:57:18.660 pattern

00:57:18.940 is

00:57:19.160 pretty

00:57:19.340 clear

00:57:19.620 the

00:57:20.740 left

00:57:21.220 seems

00:57:21.840 to

00:57:22.040 be

00:57:22.200 completely

00:57:22.800 aware

00:57:23.320 that

00:57:24.480 if

00:57:24.640 they

00:57:24.780 let

00:57:25.020 the

00:57:25.240 truth

00:57:25.620 get

00:57:25.880 out

00:57:26.140 they

00:57:26.380 couldn't

00:57:26.760 be

00:57:27.480 in

00:57:27.660 charge

00:57:27.960 why

00:57:28.900 does

00:57:29.500 the

00:57:29.680 left

00:57:29.940 create

00:57:30.360 fake

00:57:31.340 fact

00:57:31.900 checkers

00:57:32.420 and

00:57:33.360 pretend

00:57:33.680 that

00:57:33.940 they're

00:57:34.120 real

00:57:34.380 because

00:57:35.560 if

00:57:35.900 real

00:57:36.200 ones

00:57:36.460 were

00:57:36.620 there

00:57:36.820 their

00:57:37.020 whole

00:57:37.220 game

00:57:37.500 would

00:57:37.700 be

00:57:38.100 uncovered

00:57:38.760 so

00:57:39.780 they

00:57:39.960 have

00:57:40.220 to

00:57:40.340 have

00:57:40.500 fake

00:57:40.740 fact

00:57:41.040 checkers

00:57:41.520 because

00:57:42.660 they're

00:57:42.800 protecting

00:57:43.180 the

00:57:43.400 fake

00:57:43.620 news

00:57:43.980 so

00:57:46.620 100%

00:57:47.480 of

00:57:47.820 everything

00:57:48.260 that

00:57:48.560 the

00:57:48.700 Democrats

00:57:49.040 are

00:57:49.280 doing

00:57:49.600 is

00:57:50.120 to

00:57:50.240 make

00:57:50.380 sure

00:57:50.560 you

00:57:50.720 don't

00:57:50.940 know

00:57:51.060 what

00:57:51.180 the

00:57:51.300 Democrats

00:57:51.640 are

00:57:51.880 doing

00:57:52.140 that's

00:57:52.780 the

00:57:52.920 whole

00:57:53.180 game

00:57:53.520 now

00:57:54.420 I

00:57:54.580 don't

00:57:54.740 know

00:57:54.880 that

00:57:55.040 that's

00:57:55.260 exactly

00:57:55.660 the

00:57:55.880 same

00:57:56.100 for

00:57:56.420 the

00:57:56.620 Republicans

00:57:57.100 I

00:57:58.880 mean

00:57:59.080 I'm

00:57:59.360 sure

00:57:59.540 that

00:57:59.740 there's

00:57:59.960 a lot

00:58:00.220 of 0.99

00:58:00.360 fuckery 1.00

00:58:00.720 in 0.99

00:58:00.940 the

00:58:01.060 Republican

00:58:01.460 Party

00:58:01.840 I'm

00:58:02.420 sure

00:58:02.540 there's

00:58:02.740 a lot

00:58:02.900 of 1.00

00:58:03.040 bullshit 1.00

00:58:03.360 and 1.00

00:58:03.660 lying

00:58:04.020 of

00:58:04.660 course

00:58:05.000 because

00:58:05.380 it's

00:58:05.560 politics

00:58:06.000 but

00:58:06.740 I

00:58:06.920 don't

00:58:07.340 really

00:58:07.600 see

00:58:07.820 the

00:58:07.980 Republicans

00:58:08.520 trying

00:58:09.620 to

00:58:09.840 remove

00:58:10.400 free

00:58:11.480 speech

00:58:11.900 and

00:58:12.200 information

00:58:12.760 from

00:58:13.160 you

00:58:13.400 have

00:58:14.340 you

00:58:14.440 ever

00:58:14.600 seen

00:58:14.900 a

00:58:15.140 Republican

00:58:15.640 say

00:58:16.180 I

00:58:18.680 think

00:58:19.300 well

00:58:19.780 you know

00:58:20.100 actually

00:58:20.360 the public

00:58:20.940 says

00:58:21.200 CNN

00:58:21.480 should go

00:58:21.880 out in

00:58:22.040 business

00:58:22.340 but

00:58:22.680 you

00:58:22.880 don't

00:58:23.020 really

00:58:23.260 think

00:58:23.460 that

00:58:23.740 you'd

00:58:24.400 rather

00:58:24.600 they

00:58:24.820 cover

00:58:25.080 the

00:58:25.280 news

00:58:25.620 if

00:58:27.600 they're

00:58:27.740 not

00:58:27.920 going to

00:58:28.120 really

00:58:28.360 cover

00:58:28.620 the

00:58:28.800 news

00:58:29.040 then

00:58:29.220 going

00:58:29.420 out of

00:58:29.640 business

00:58:29.900 is

00:58:30.180 actually

00:58:30.480 the

00:58:30.660 first

00:58:30.860 choice

00:58:31.200 but

00:58:31.980 it's

00:58:32.700 only

00:58:32.840 because

00:58:33.100 they're

00:58:33.280 not

00:58:33.540 covering

00:58:33.880 the

00:58:34.080 news

00:58:34.380 nobody

00:58:35.400 wants

00:58:35.800 CNN

00:58:36.120 to

00:58:36.420 go

00:58:36.600 out

00:58:36.700 of

00:58:36.780 business

00:58:37.080 if

00:58:37.380 they

00:58:37.520 cover

00:58:37.800 the

00:58:38.020 news

00:58:38.500 that's

00:58:39.700 not

00:58:39.880 even

00:58:40.040 a

00:58:40.200 thing

00:58:40.440 it's

00:58:41.300 only

00:58:41.460 because

00:58:41.660 they

00:58:41.800 don't

00:58:42.020 cover

00:58:42.240 the

00:58:42.400 news

00:58:42.640 and

00:58:42.820 they

00:58:42.960 aggressively

00:58:43.500 don't

00:58:43.860 cover

00:58:44.120 it

00:58:44.360 like

00:58:44.940 they

00:58:45.100 really

00:58:45.460 make

00:58:45.780 sure

00:58:45.980 they

00:58:46.160 don't

00:58:46.360 cover

00:58:46.600 it

00:58:46.760 if

00:58:46.900 you

00:58:47.000 know

00:58:47.120 what

00:58:47.220 I

00:58:47.300 mean

00:58:47.520 at

00:58:48.560 least

00:58:48.720 the

00:58:49.120 context

00:58:49.560 that

00:58:49.760 would

00:58:49.880 matter

00:58:50.180 so

00:58:55.440 one

00:58:56.000 comment

00:58:56.400 is

00:58:56.700 that

00:58:56.920 GOP 1.00

00:58:57.480 fuckery 1.00

00:58:57.940 is 0.99

00:58:58.100 more

00:58:58.300 about

00:58:58.540 dodging

00:58:59.000 taxes

00:58:59.480 and

00:59:00.160 being

00:59:00.360 able

00:59:00.600 to 0.99

00:59:00.760 kill 1.00

00:59:00.940 spotted

00:59:01.360 owls

00:59:01.720 for

00:59:01.900 sport

00:59:02.300 see

00:59:03.980 now

00:59:04.160 that's

00:59:04.420 just

00:59:04.580 a

00:59:04.720 good

00:59:04.860 exaggeration

00:59:05.620 so

00:59:06.820 you know

00:59:07.520 you can

00:59:07.820 recognize

00:59:08.220 that

00:59:08.440 for

00:59:08.540 what

00:59:08.700 it

00:59:08.800 is

00:59:09.100 yeah

00:59:12.580 so

00:59:12.920 we've

00:59:13.220 learned

00:59:13.460 that

00:59:13.740 science

00:59:14.400 was a

00:59:15.100 way

00:59:15.360 to

00:59:15.580 launder

00:59:15.960 opinion

00:59:16.580 right

00:59:19.000 science

00:59:20.300 in

00:59:20.560 2023

00:59:21.200 science

00:59:23.080 at least

00:59:23.860 the science

00:59:24.360 that has

00:59:24.940 an impact

00:59:25.360 on our

00:59:25.680 policy

00:59:26.100 not

00:59:26.680 not the

00:59:27.040 basic

00:59:27.320 science

00:59:27.760 that's

00:59:28.000 just

00:59:28.160 happening

00:59:28.520 in the

00:59:28.840 lab

00:59:29.140 that's

00:59:29.480 probably

00:59:29.680 fine

00:59:30.040 you know

00:59:30.920 the basic

00:59:31.320 science

00:59:31.740 that's

00:59:32.000 non-political

00:59:32.760 it's

00:59:34.440 probably

00:59:34.680 half

00:59:35.080 right

00:59:35.440 and that's

00:59:36.180 as good

00:59:36.460 as it's

00:59:36.780 ever

00:59:36.960 been

00:59:37.240 but

00:59:37.480 it's

00:59:37.780 all

00:59:37.900 we

00:59:38.020 got

00:59:38.280 but

00:59:39.480 any

00:59:40.220 science

00:59:41.080 that has

00:59:41.380 a direct

00:59:41.760 impact

00:59:42.120 on

00:59:42.380 policy

00:59:43.000 is

00:59:43.800 just

00:59:44.000 a way

00:59:44.220 to

00:59:44.360 launder

00:59:44.600 opinion

00:59:45.020 or to

00:59:45.760 launder

00:59:46.100 your

00:59:46.520 money

00:59:46.720 making

00:59:46.980 schemes

00:59:47.500 yeah

00:59:49.020 and war

00:59:51.100 of course

00:59:51.660 is a way

00:59:52.200 to use

00:59:52.540 up your

00:59:52.940 old

00:59:53.280 AMO

00:59:53.720 so you

00:59:54.200 have to

00:59:54.440 buy

00:59:54.600 new

00:59:54.860 and

00:59:55.980 test

00:59:56.680 out

00:59:56.840 your

00:59:57.000 weapons

00:59:57.400 because

00:59:58.340 nobody

00:59:58.640 cares

00:59:58.920 about

00:59:59.220 young

00:59:59.580 men

00:59:59.800 especially

01:00:00.200 can you

01:00:01.720 imagine

01:00:02.060 what

01:00:02.640 Ukraine

01:00:03.480 would look

01:00:04.060 like

01:00:04.380 if people

01:00:05.220 cared about

01:00:05.780 the lives

01:00:06.340 of young

01:00:06.740 men

01:00:07.000 or men

01:00:08.740 in general

01:00:09.200 if anybody

01:00:10.760 cared about

01:00:11.260 men

01:00:11.580 there would

01:00:12.060 be no

01:00:12.360 war in

01:00:12.940 Ukraine

01:00:13.400 it's

01:00:14.480 basically

01:00:14.880 that it's

01:00:15.640 free

01:00:15.960 for

01:00:17.740 for the

01:00:17.920 Ukrainians

01:00:18.620 the only

01:00:19.080 thing

01:00:19.300 they're

01:00:19.500 spending

01:00:19.880 is

01:00:20.380 mostly

01:00:21.680 young

01:00:23.200 men

01:00:23.540 and they

01:00:24.820 were

01:00:24.920 free

01:00:25.160 and the

01:00:26.280 money

01:00:26.500 that they're

01:00:26.860 spending

01:00:27.160 is somebody

01:00:27.580 else's

01:00:28.100 they're

01:00:28.640 spending

01:00:28.940 our

01:00:29.180 money

01:00:29.500 and they're

01:00:31.400 spending

01:00:31.720 the lives

01:00:33.080 of males

01:00:34.040 which are

01:00:34.580 free

01:00:34.860 so it's

01:00:36.300 a free

01:00:36.640 just follow

01:00:37.380 the money

01:00:37.780 if you're

01:00:38.540 in Ukraine

01:00:39.040 why would

01:00:39.500 you stop

01:00:39.840 fighting

01:00:40.200 you don't

01:00:41.460 care about

01:00:41.840 the people

01:00:42.200 who are

01:00:42.360 dying

01:00:42.640 there aren't

01:00:44.280 that many

01:00:44.720 civilians

01:00:45.260 dying at

01:00:45.740 the moment

01:00:46.220 that could 0.68

01:00:47.040 get worse

01:00:47.560 but the

01:00:48.400 moment is

01:00:48.820 mostly

01:00:49.120 military

01:00:49.520 people

01:00:49.900 dying

01:00:50.260 mostly

01:00:50.980 men

01:00:51.280 nobody

01:00:52.000 cares

01:00:52.360 that's

01:00:54.380 pretty much

01:00:54.760 the whole

01:00:55.060 story

01:00:55.400 you can

01:00:56.780 describe

01:00:57.300 Ukraine

01:00:57.760 in one

01:00:58.700 sentence

01:00:59.220 nobody

01:01:00.760 cares if

01:01:01.340 men

01:01:01.580 die 1.00

01:01:01.880 if they 1.00

01:01:04.180 did

01:01:04.420 there would

01:01:04.680 be no

01:01:05.020 conflict

01:01:05.980 at all

01:01:06.600 alright

01:01:10.460 so I

01:01:11.820 think we

01:01:12.100 got to

01:01:12.340 the point

01:01:12.600 where we

01:01:13.180 understand

01:01:13.640 that almost

01:01:14.460 everything

01:01:14.960 Democrats

01:01:15.500 do

01:01:15.800 is a

01:01:16.720 diversion

01:01:17.180 from

01:01:17.660 letting

01:01:18.100 you know

01:01:18.520 what's

01:01:18.740 happening

01:01:19.060 now

01:01:20.660 the only

01:01:21.680 way that

01:01:22.100 I would

01:01:22.320 say that

01:01:22.720 the

01:01:22.960 Republicans

01:01:24.460 are similar

01:01:25.100 there might

01:01:25.580 be some

01:01:25.900 other

01:01:26.080 examples

01:01:26.480 here

01:01:26.700 I don't

01:01:27.140 want to

01:01:27.340 make it

01:01:27.560 all one

01:01:27.880 sided

01:01:28.140 but there

01:01:29.000 might be

01:01:29.260 some

01:01:29.440 other

01:01:29.740 some

01:01:31.500 examples

01:01:32.020 such as

01:01:32.860 the

01:01:34.040 Republicans

01:01:34.500 talk about

01:01:35.360 debt

01:01:35.760 but they

01:01:37.420 don't seem

01:01:37.860 too serious

01:01:38.480 about it

01:01:38.940 if you

01:01:39.220 know what

01:01:39.480 I mean

01:01:39.800 like we've

01:01:41.680 never seen

01:01:42.100 a Republican

01:01:42.600 come up

01:01:43.220 with a

01:01:43.720 budget that

01:01:45.000 would reduce

01:01:45.800 the debt

01:01:46.340 have they

01:01:48.340 even tried

01:01:48.860 no

01:01:50.060 because the

01:01:52.460 thing with

01:01:52.820 the debt

01:01:53.180 is there

01:01:54.360 will always

01:01:54.840 be the

01:01:55.180 person who

01:01:55.640 comes after

01:01:56.120 you that

01:01:56.520 will do

01:01:56.800 worse

01:01:57.180 as long

01:01:58.520 as the

01:01:58.840 administration

01:01:59.460 that follows

01:02:00.020 you

01:02:00.320 you know

01:02:01.060 is going

01:02:01.400 to do

01:02:01.640 worse

01:02:01.940 and they

01:02:02.300 will

01:02:02.560 because the

01:02:03.180 debt's

01:02:03.440 out of

01:02:03.660 control

01:02:04.020 then you

01:02:05.880 could say

01:02:06.260 well

01:02:06.600 look

01:02:07.780 do you

01:02:08.920 think

01:02:09.120 Obama's

01:02:09.720 bragging

01:02:10.160 because

01:02:10.720 Trump

01:02:11.120 added

01:02:11.400 more

01:02:11.620 to

01:02:11.780 the

01:02:11.920 debt

01:02:12.180 of

01:02:12.640 course

01:02:12.960 do you

01:02:13.860 think

01:02:14.020 Trump's

01:02:14.440 bragging

01:02:14.840 because

01:02:15.480 Biden

01:02:17.180 added

01:02:17.580 more

01:02:17.820 to the

01:02:18.120 debt

01:02:18.300 of

01:02:18.520 course

01:02:18.860 as long

01:02:21.240 as you

01:02:21.560 can be

01:02:21.920 sure

01:02:22.420 that the

01:02:23.540 next

01:02:23.840 administration

01:02:24.520 will be

01:02:24.980 worse

01:02:25.380 spend

01:02:27.240 whatever

01:02:27.500 you want

01:02:27.860 it's

01:02:27.960 free

01:02:28.160 you'll

01:02:29.680 always be

01:02:30.040 able to

01:02:30.300 say

01:02:30.500 well

01:02:30.740 it was

01:02:30.880 only half

01:02:31.280 as bad

01:02:31.600 as the

01:02:31.860 current

01:02:32.120 guy

01:02:32.340 so

01:02:33.100 leave

01:02:33.700 me

01:02:33.820 alone

01:02:34.080 yeah

01:02:36.180 so our

01:02:36.540 government

01:02:36.840 has created

01:02:37.300 a situation

01:02:37.940 where they

01:02:38.900 can drive

01:02:39.440 the country

01:02:39.920 into ruin

01:02:40.580 while never

01:02:42.500 making it

01:02:43.040 look like

01:02:43.400 it was

01:02:43.640 their fault

01:02:44.100 because

01:02:46.000 there will

01:02:46.160 always be

01:02:46.460 somebody

01:02:46.740 else to

01:02:47.080 blame

01:02:47.300 so

01:02:48.640 by design

01:02:49.680 we should

01:02:50.160 be going

01:02:50.660 out of

01:02:51.260 business

01:02:51.580 as a

01:02:51.980 country

01:02:52.300 by design

01:02:53.680 not by

01:02:55.100 accident

01:02:55.620 it's

01:02:56.780 designed

01:02:57.300 to go

01:02:57.740 out of

01:02:57.940 business

01:02:58.220 at the

01:02:58.580 moment

01:02:58.900 because

01:02:59.640 there's

01:02:59.920 nothing

01:03:00.160 to stop

01:03:00.620 the

01:03:00.800 debt

01:03:01.080 if we

01:03:02.780 had

01:03:02.960 something

01:03:03.280 in our

01:03:03.640 system

01:03:03.940 that could 0.68

01:03:04.320 potentially

01:03:04.780 stop

01:03:05.220 the debt

01:03:05.580 from

01:03:05.820 increasing

01:03:06.260 then I

01:03:06.740 would say

01:03:07.100 okay

01:03:08.420 we've

01:03:08.800 got a

01:03:09.000 plan

01:03:09.300 but we

01:03:10.000 actually

01:03:10.240 have a

01:03:10.540 design

01:03:11.060 to put

01:03:12.160 us

01:03:12.300 out of

01:03:12.480 business

01:03:12.840 completely

01:03:14.320 we could

01:03:17.320 change

01:03:17.620 the design

01:03:18.280 but I

01:03:19.140 see no

01:03:19.600 action

01:03:20.020 does anybody

01:03:21.140 see anything

01:03:21.960 that would

01:03:22.300 even

01:03:22.460 remotely

01:03:23.200 change the

01:03:24.960 fact that

01:03:25.460 we're

01:03:25.940 flying out

01:03:26.860 of control

01:03:27.300 in debt

01:03:27.740 I've never

01:03:28.760 seen anything

01:03:29.240 that would

01:03:29.520 even remotely

01:03:30.420 get to it

01:03:31.220 because my

01:03:32.300 understanding

01:03:32.760 is our

01:03:33.240 economy could

01:03:34.040 never be

01:03:34.560 big enough

01:03:34.980 to pay

01:03:35.300 it back

01:03:35.720 I don't

01:03:37.820 think there's

01:03:38.180 any scenario

01:03:38.760 where our

01:03:39.300 economy would

01:03:39.840 ever be

01:03:40.300 big enough

01:03:40.760 to pay

01:03:41.640 back the

01:03:42.000 debt

01:03:42.240 or even

01:03:43.180 to reduce

01:03:44.060 the increase

01:03:44.780 in the debt

01:03:45.220 which would

01:03:45.600 get you

01:03:45.900 to the same

01:03:46.200 place

01:03:46.500 yeah

01:03:50.660 so I

01:03:52.100 don't know

01:03:52.340 unless we

01:03:52.820 do some

01:03:53.680 radical shift

01:03:54.720 to bitcoin

01:03:56.160 or something

01:03:56.740 but I

01:03:58.720 don't know

01:03:58.960 I don't know

01:03:59.300 what the plan

01:03:59.700 is and I

01:04:00.500 don't know

01:04:00.720 how we even

01:04:01.120 got this

01:04:01.480 far without

01:04:01.880 going out of

01:04:02.420 business but

01:04:02.980 maybe other

01:04:03.460 countries are

01:04:04.000 worse

01:04:04.220 all right

01:04:05.740 ladies and 0.98

01:04:07.540 gentlemen

01:04:07.840 did I miss

01:04:09.680 any stories

01:04:10.340 or did I

01:04:12.420 make you so

01:04:12.880 depressed you

01:04:13.600 can't stand

01:04:14.860 sometimes I

01:04:16.980 wonder if

01:04:18.200 I'm too

01:04:18.540 happy about

01:04:19.100 things people

01:04:19.800 don't like

01:04:20.300 it because

01:04:20.920 sometimes you

01:04:21.400 want to be

01:04:21.760 angry or

01:04:22.800 you want

01:04:23.080 somebody to

01:04:23.580 share your

01:04:24.640 anger about

01:04:25.640 what's happening

01:04:26.180 there's plenty

01:04:26.720 to be angry

01:04:27.220 about yeah

01:04:28.500 we didn't

01:04:28.800 talk about

01:04:29.180 a soup

01:04:29.580 beard

01:04:30.000 well what

01:04:32.980 is Jack

01:04:33.720 Smith is that

01:04:34.460 the name of

01:04:34.900 the prosecutor

01:04:35.440 Jack Smith

01:04:36.280 he's got a

01:04:39.160 beard that

01:04:39.540 looks like

01:04:39.880 it has

01:04:40.120 soup in

01:04:40.480 it but

01:04:40.900 I don't

01:04:42.140 just me

01:04:42.660 oh so

01:04:44.020 yes so

01:04:44.820 in Florida

01:04:45.400 there was

01:04:45.980 an impeachment

01:04:46.540 against the

01:04:47.940 attorney

01:04:48.320 impeachment

01:04:49.700 attempt

01:04:50.280 against the

01:04:50.980 attorney general

01:04:51.660 Paxton

01:04:53.040 and he

01:04:54.220 was acquitted

01:04:55.520 on all

01:04:56.660 charges

01:04:57.180 right

01:04:59.120 acquitted

01:04:59.820 on all

01:05:00.280 charges

01:05:00.700 yeah so

01:05:08.320 do you

01:05:08.780 do you

01:05:09.220 therefore

01:05:09.540 say that

01:05:10.120 the charges

01:05:10.620 were invalid

01:05:11.380 because he

01:05:12.680 was acquitted

01:05:13.160 by Republicans

01:05:14.840 I don't

01:05:17.240 know I'm

01:05:18.760 not ready to

01:05:19.420 say that he

01:05:19.940 did nothing I

01:05:20.720 just haven't

01:05:21.180 followed the

01:05:21.720 story I

01:05:22.880 just know

01:05:23.320 that if you

01:05:23.980 get acquitted

01:05:24.580 by your own

01:05:25.200 party it

01:05:26.260 doesn't really

01:05:26.680 mean what you

01:05:27.220 think it

01:05:27.520 means yeah

01:05:29.340 I have no

01:05:30.120 idea if any

01:05:30.680 of the

01:05:30.980 charges were

01:05:31.640 real but I

01:05:32.580 do assume

01:05:33.100 that they

01:05:33.560 were trying

01:05:33.880 to remove

01:05:34.440 him for

01:05:34.940 because he

01:05:36.360 probably had

01:05:36.740 real data

01:05:37.560 and real

01:05:37.900 information or

01:05:38.540 something

01:05:38.860 I guess

01:05:40.140 batcho

01:05:40.600 goatee

01:05:41.100 that's funny

01:05:42.240 all right

01:05:45.940 Susanna

01:05:57.000 Gibson

01:05:57.520 chatterbait 0.98

01:05:58.240 scandal

01:05:58.760 I don't

01:06:00.020 really care

01:06:00.460 that there

01:06:00.820 was a

01:06:01.160 we have a

01:06:01.800 politician

01:06:02.240 who was

01:06:02.700 once in

01:06:03.120 sex work

01:06:03.780 does anybody

01:06:05.400 care about

01:06:05.860 that

01:06:06.120 so there's

01:06:07.800 there's some

01:06:08.280 story that I

01:06:08.980 you know

01:06:09.480 barely followed

01:06:10.180 because I

01:06:10.500 don't care

01:06:10.860 there's some

01:06:11.860 woman who 0.99

01:06:12.280 used to do

01:06:12.820 some online

01:06:13.820 you know

01:06:15.500 sex work

01:06:16.400 but now she's 0.96

01:06:18.020 yeah it's the

01:06:18.460 same job

01:06:19.020 I would say

01:06:20.540 that she's

01:06:20.940 very qualified

01:06:21.700 it doesn't

01:06:24.700 mean anything

01:06:25.200 somebody says

01:06:29.300 she's hot 1.00

01:06:30.260 but her

01:06:30.540 performance was

01:06:31.280 lackluster

01:06:31.820 well that

01:06:32.580 would count

01:06:32.920 against her

01:06:33.400 running for

01:06:33.960 public office

01:06:34.680 I wouldn't

01:06:35.900 want to know

01:06:37.020 she was bad 0.97

01:06:37.620 at it

01:06:38.080 if you told me

01:06:40.140 she was good 0.66

01:06:40.680 at it

01:06:41.040 I'd say

01:06:41.340 well that could

01:06:41.860 be a plus

01:06:42.320 for public

01:06:42.800 office

01:06:43.180 but if she

01:06:44.020 was bad

01:06:44.400 at being a 0.98

01:06:44.820 sex worker

01:06:45.320 online 0.98

01:06:45.820 I'd have to

01:06:47.700 hold that

01:06:48.000 against her

01:06:48.460 the 19th

01:06:54.660 amendment

01:06:54.960 has entered

01:06:55.560 the chat

01:06:56.160 what's the

01:06:56.840 19th

01:06:57.680 remind me

01:07:00.780 what's the

01:07:01.120 19th

01:07:02.240 women voting

01:07:04.040 that's funny

01:07:07.580 all right

01:07:11.080 I think

01:07:16.820 we've done

01:07:17.180 everything we

01:07:17.660 need to do

01:07:18.120 for today

01:07:18.620 have we

01:07:19.700 not

01:07:20.000 have we

01:07:21.400 not

01:07:21.780 done

01:07:22.340 everything

01:07:22.660 we need

01:07:23.060 to do

01:07:23.440 I've got

01:07:24.320 some stuff

01:07:25.100 to tell

01:07:25.420 the locals

01:07:26.020 people

01:07:26.400 privately

01:07:27.840 after I

01:07:28.540 go private

01:07:29.040 so thanks

01:07:32.480 for joining

01:07:32.900 YouTube

01:07:33.400 always a

01:07:34.700 pleasure

01:07:34.920 I'll talk

01:07:36.440 to you

01:07:36.880 soon

01:07:37.280 bye for

01:07:38.000 now

01:07:38.220 see you

01:07:39.140 in the

01:07:39.240 morning

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - September 17, 2023

Episode 2234 Scott Adams： All Of The News Turned Funny Lately. Come Enjoy It

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript