Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2241 Scott Adams： Lots Of Fake News And Fake Science Today (Probably All Of It) Bring Coffee

00:00:00.880 Do, do, do, do, do, do, do, do, do, do, do, do, do, do, do.

00:00:07.280 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.

00:00:13.260 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams.

00:00:14.980 I'm pretty sure you've never had a better time in your life, and it's going to get better.

00:00:19.600 Yeah, in a moment, we're going to levels that nobody's ever even heard of in their entire life.

00:00:25.180 All you need is a copper mug or a glass,

00:00:28.200 So take your gelster's dye in a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:33.020 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:34.620 I like coffee.

00:00:36.220 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.

00:00:38.500 It's the dopamine at the end of the day, the thing that makes everything better.

00:00:41.600 It's called the simultaneous sip.

00:00:43.840 Join me now.

00:00:45.260 Go.

00:00:49.480 Oh.

00:00:51.660 Everything in my life is a little bit better right now.

00:00:54.820 A little bit.

00:00:55.760 It's really all directional.

00:00:56.820 You take that sip of coffee, and you're at least heading in the right direction for a change.

00:01:03.320 Am I right?

00:01:06.120 Well, I've got an update.

00:01:08.540 I've decided that instead of having a mere live stream, or some would call it a podcast, that doesn't sound cool.

00:01:17.960 Doesn't sound cool at all.

00:01:19.640 So instead, I've decided that at least the people who are on the local subscription site, we're going to form a cult.

00:01:26.820 A cult.

00:01:29.480 Now, we're not going to require you to shave your head.

00:01:33.160 You know, unless you're going to follow the leader sort of thing.

00:01:37.620 But, you know, I'll just shave mine. 0.92

00:01:39.660 The rest of you, you can shave anything you want.

00:01:41.900 It's free form.

00:01:44.960 If you think it needs shaving, shave it.

00:01:49.060 You can wear anything you need.

00:01:50.660 You do not need to wear flowing robes.

00:01:53.580 Pajamas are recommended, but not required.

00:01:55.580 However, there is one requirement for being in the Scott Adams Coffee with Scott Adams cult.

00:02:03.440 You have to get our vaccination.

00:02:06.000 We've developed our own vaccination, and it's just for people in the group. 0.56

00:02:10.940 And if you're worried about the safety, don't be, because we tested it on six mice.

00:02:17.220 So our vaccination was tested on six mice.

00:02:21.020 Five of them survived, so I'm feeling pretty good about that.

00:02:24.640 So that's a requirement.

00:02:25.660 If you want to join the Coffee with Scott Adams cult, you've got to get our vaccination,

00:02:31.340 which was successful in five and six mice.

00:02:35.120 Well, one of the big questions we've had is, what is a woman?

00:02:38.940 I know Matt Walsh has asked that question.

00:02:40.960 What is a woman? 1.00

00:02:42.120 And a lot of you were saying, Scott, we can't figure out what is a woman.

00:02:46.200 Will you finally settle this for us?

00:02:48.860 So I have.

00:02:50.860 A lot of people, when asked that question, they just fall apart.

00:02:55.660 So, what is a woman? 1.00

00:02:59.180 Well, let's see.

00:03:00.740 You've got your chromosomes and your genes, but then your preferences,

00:03:05.440 but then you wake up in the morning and you feel more like a woman,

00:03:09.080 so you put on lipstick, but you could have felt more.

00:03:11.680 See, that's no good.

00:03:13.240 No good.

00:03:14.400 That's how people answer that question.

00:03:16.860 I'd like to now model for you the correct way to answer the question.

00:03:22.140 What is a woman? 1.00

00:03:23.060 Because you might get trapped.

00:03:24.400 In fact, somebody might put a microphone in your face when you're walking down the street.

00:03:30.060 Excuse me, ma'am or sir, can you tell me what is a woman? 1.00

00:03:35.800 And so I'd like to show you the correct way to do this.

00:03:40.120 We'll be using Dale.

00:03:41.900 Excuse me, sir.

00:03:46.020 Could you tell me what is a woman? 1.00

00:03:50.500 And then I say, yes.

00:03:51.900 And I always take the microphone out of their hand because you want to take the power away.

00:03:56.180 Yes.

00:03:58.120 Yes.

00:03:58.500 Definition of a woman is, I define a woman as anyone who doesn't think about ancient Rome once a day. 0.80

00:04:11.820 If you're not thinking about ancient Rome at least once a day, can we really call you a man?

00:04:28.960 You would only be sort of a man.

00:04:33.380 Yeah.

00:04:33.660 If you think of it five times a day like I do, all man.

00:04:38.900 Totally male. 0.91

00:04:41.220 All right.

00:04:41.760 How many of you have seen the video, new video of Tesla's new robot they're working on called Optimus?

00:04:47.680 And watch it as standing there like a person and sorting blue and green things into different bins?

00:04:55.800 Now, the amazing thing is not that it looks exactly like a person.

00:05:00.860 No, it looks like a robot.

00:05:02.660 But the way it moves is kind of exactly like a person now.

00:05:08.100 You really, I don't know if you could tell the difference.

00:05:11.320 It has hands and a body and everything.

00:05:13.460 But the thing that's new about it, because they've had robots that could sort of things before.

00:05:20.340 But what's new is they taught it to do this by video.

00:05:24.380 So they just showed it a whole bunch of video of stuff.

00:05:27.580 And then it knew how to do the stuff.

00:05:30.020 This is a whole new world.

00:05:32.800 A whole new world.

00:05:34.800 I want one of those robots so badly.

00:05:38.620 Now, I don't know what the first Tesla robot's going to cost.

00:05:42.620 What would be your guess?

00:05:44.440 Has that ever been published?

00:05:46.840 If you had to guess the first humanoid Tesla robot, you're saying $15,000?

00:05:56.580 I was thinking a quarter of a million.

00:06:01.280 I was thinking more like a quarter million dollars for a robot.

00:06:05.460 For the first ones.

00:06:07.000 You know, someday there'll be $50,000.

00:06:08.900 Someday there'll be $10,000.

00:06:10.100 But I think the first ones are going to be industrial only.

00:06:15.680 And they will replace an employee.

00:06:18.380 If you get a quarter million dollar robot, how many years do you have to use it in replacement of a person before you get your money back?

00:06:27.240 It's not that long.

00:06:29.920 Because a quarter million would be two years of a high income or a higher income person, you know, with benefits.

00:06:37.320 Because remember, there's no benefits either.

00:06:38.960 Well, there's maintenance, I guess.

00:06:40.240 So that's sort of an offset.

00:06:42.420 But I would think you could price these things, the first ones, at about a quarter million apiece.

00:06:48.020 Because they're going to do dangerous work that you don't want to hire regular humans to do anyway. 0.99

00:06:54.000 So if you're thinking it's going to be $10,000, maybe.

00:06:58.680 It might be.

00:07:00.400 I mean, you know, it's Tesla and it's Musk.

00:07:03.240 So if Elon Musk thinks that a low price is how you get more, you know, more immediate stuff, then maybe it will be.

00:07:14.440 But let me ask you this.

00:07:16.140 How many millionaires and billionaires would want to get a robot that could actually just walk around and hang around with them?

00:07:24.880 I think a lot.

00:07:25.920 I think there are actually way more people than you think who would pay a quarter million dollars for the first robot.

00:07:34.460 I think there would be quite a few.

00:07:36.700 I wouldn't, but there will be people.

00:07:41.680 All right.

00:07:43.000 MIT has some big breakthrough in the hardware part for AI, just to make sure that you can learn and process faster.

00:07:52.840 And it's something like several orders of magnitude better.

00:07:56.940 So who knows if that will turn into anything, but it does come from, it's an MIT team, so that's good.

00:08:02.580 And it's just sort of a sign of where this could go.

00:08:08.540 As interesting and good as AI is at the moment, here's one, just one technology that might make it 100 times more efficient to learn and become an AI.

00:08:20.280 A hundred times better.

00:08:22.780 And that's happening the same year that AI became a thing.

00:08:27.820 That somebody figured out how to make it 100 times better, or at least more efficient.

00:08:33.460 All right.

00:08:34.000 I have a question for you that I was mulling this morning, and I'll just put it out there.

00:08:38.680 All right.

00:08:38.860 The large language model AIs, as you all know by now, it creates something like intelligence just by looking at the combinations of words,

00:08:48.540 as those words have been used by humans.

00:08:52.480 So it can find intelligence just in the combination of words.

00:08:56.600 Now, here's the next question.

00:08:59.300 Words, as they're represented on a computer, could also be thought of as numbers.

00:09:05.960 You could think of it as, you know, you could change any word into a number and then do math on it and stuff.

00:09:14.100 But you could at least turn it into zeros and ones.

00:09:18.840 So it's amazing that you could make intelligence out of words,

00:09:23.780 but it's even freakier when you think those words could be represented in zeros and ones.

00:09:28.260 And then a combination of zeros and ones, which is also words, and then the combination of those words is intelligence.

00:09:37.640 But if you take it all the way back, all you needed for intelligence was zeros and ones in the right combination.

00:09:46.140 How freaky is that?

00:09:47.460 It was just zeros and ones in the right combination, made intelligence.

00:09:54.540 I don't know.

00:09:55.700 I mean, it only works because it's based on human intelligence.

00:09:59.160 If you didn't have that to seed it, it wouldn't work.

00:10:01.940 But it's just a combination of zeros and ones.

00:10:05.180 If that makes you think your intelligence is special, maybe not.

00:10:12.660 Maybe that's why I like drumming.

00:10:15.640 If you look at drum beats, they're just left and right.

00:10:19.100 Left, right, left, right.

00:10:20.760 And sometimes kick.

00:10:24.460 All right, well, that was sort of a dead end.

00:10:27.140 I didn't have anywhere to go with that.

00:10:29.020 But I just thought it was amazing that intelligence could be just zeros and ones.

00:10:33.740 All right, let's talk about all the fake news.

00:10:36.920 CNN has a big article about Biden doing a bunch of useful things

00:10:41.540 to secure the border.

00:10:44.460 Now, since you're all suspicious and skeptical news observers,

00:10:49.340 what do you make of the fact that the Biden administration

00:10:52.900 is doing several things, working with Mexico specifically,

00:10:56.640 to reduce immigration?

00:10:58.760 What's the first thing that you say by that?

00:11:02.540 The first thing you say is, well, that's interesting.

00:11:06.260 Number one, why does Mexico have to do everything instead of us? 0.99

00:11:13.760 Now, maybe you say, well, it's just easier.

00:11:15.660 You just get it sooner, or, you know, our laws don't apply if it happens down there,

00:11:20.300 so we don't have to worry about our own laws getting in the way,

00:11:22.780 like asylum and stuff.

00:11:24.080 That'll make sense.

00:11:24.900 But why is it that we have to depend on other countries to secure our border?

00:11:32.620 Isn't one eyebrow just going up?

00:11:35.300 It's like, let me understand this.

00:11:39.020 Can you think of any other country who's having a border problem,

00:11:43.800 and the way they solve it is they go to the other country,

00:11:46.780 and they say, could you act differently

00:11:48.500 so that we don't have to close our border?

00:11:51.000 Who does that?

00:11:54.620 Right.

00:11:55.060 There's something just naturally wrong with the story, isn't there?

00:11:59.440 There's something, like, missing in the story.

00:12:02.460 Like, we can't close our own borders.

00:12:04.320 You have to beg the other country to completely change their processes 1.00

00:12:09.340 so you don't have to control your border.

00:12:12.980 Okay.

00:12:13.520 So that's the first head-scratcher.

00:12:15.480 The second one is, why now?

00:12:18.540 Well, why would they be getting serious about now?

00:12:24.360 The only reason is because it's making Biden poll poorly for the presidents.

00:12:30.280 It obviously has to do with 2024,

00:12:32.980 and it obviously is being driven only by politics,

00:12:37.440 which suggests that the people behind, you know, border security

00:12:41.580 are not interested in actually securing the border.

00:12:44.820 Because if you require the politics to even be interested in it,

00:12:50.220 there's not much interest there in just doing your job.

00:12:54.440 You know, it's not until you're threatened that you do something.

00:12:57.400 But I'll tell you what the most amazing thing is about this story,

00:13:00.720 and I wonder how many of you would have mentioned, would have noticed.

00:13:04.800 Do you remember when RFK Jr. did his documentary,

00:13:08.160 a little film about the border?

00:13:10.000 And although he's Democrat, so you'd expect him to, you know,

00:13:14.460 buy into the Democrat narrative of everything,

00:13:17.620 when he reported, he told us something that I did not know,

00:13:22.060 that almost all of the immigration was from countries outside of Central and South America.

00:13:28.760 That was coming from Africa and some parts of, I don't know, Eastern Europe and Asia.

00:13:34.300 Now, according to RFK Jr., it was almost entirely that group.

00:13:41.220 Yeah, a lot of Africa, China, et cetera, Middle East, almost entirely.

00:13:48.060 And it was actually very little from the actual region.

00:13:51.780 So when CNN does their story, it's a big story,

00:13:55.980 about how a bunch of stuff is being done on the border

00:13:58.960 and that the U.S. is working with Mexico to keep people within Mexico

00:14:04.000 so they don't cross over.

00:14:07.040 What part of the story mentions that the people are not coming from Central and South America?

00:14:13.840 Well, I read it quickly, but I didn't see it.

00:14:16.640 It wasn't mentioned.

00:14:18.740 So somehow CNN wrote this major story about immigration and the border

00:14:22.960 without mentioning where the people are coming from.

00:14:25.780 Does that sound right?

00:14:30.400 Is there, like, obviously something that they've left out of this story?

00:14:33.740 Or did RFK Jr. just make it up?

00:14:36.740 Did RFK Jr. just, like, do a film and all of it was fake?

00:14:40.560 And they really are coming from Mexico and Central America,

00:14:43.580 but he reported the opposite?

00:14:46.320 Is that possible?

00:14:49.700 I don't know.

00:14:51.460 Seems unlikely.

00:14:52.380 If I had to bet who's lying to me,

00:14:56.000 RFK Jr., where he's showing his work,

00:14:58.540 or CNN, where they're just talking to you.

00:15:01.500 I'm going to go with RFK Jr. on this one.

00:15:04.620 So that's some serious propaganda-y fake news.

00:15:09.540 Because let me ask this.

00:15:10.800 How do you feel about immigration

00:15:12.620 if you know it's coming from people who live south of our border

00:15:16.920 versus how do you feel about it

00:15:19.460 if it's military-age men from all over the world?

00:15:24.740 Completely different, right?

00:15:26.900 How you feel about it is completely different.

00:15:29.740 Because we're a little bit used to immigration from our southern region,

00:15:33.540 and we know what problems and what benefits that brings.

00:15:37.020 It's well understood.

00:15:38.080 But as soon as you say military-age men from all over the world,

00:15:43.840 I assume some number of them are terrorists,

00:15:47.300 and some of them were.

00:15:48.440 A lot of them were caught as actually terrorists.

00:15:52.900 Now, how many of the terrorists got through?

00:15:54.540 I would think the terrorists would be trying pretty hard not to get caught,

00:15:58.540 even harder than the regular immigrants. 1.00

00:16:01.300 Because the regular immigrants don't mind that much getting caught, right? 1.00

00:16:05.280 Because they still get released into the United States.

00:16:07.340 But if you're an immigrant and you're a terrorist, 0.90

00:16:11.160 and you're on some list,

00:16:13.000 you're going to really, really, really try hard to not get caught, I would think.

00:16:18.040 So how many of those got away?

00:16:20.640 I have no idea.

00:16:22.120 Could be thousands of military terrorists in the country.

00:16:29.520 We have no idea.

00:16:30.440 There's no way to know.

00:16:32.480 So that's less than awesome.

00:16:34.060 But look for the dog not barking,

00:16:38.400 which is CNN not telling you the nature of the people coming into the country.

00:16:42.480 Let's talk about the Washington Post.

00:16:45.100 The Washington Post is flailing like crazy

00:16:47.600 because they've been totally outed for being a disinformation source.

00:16:52.720 But apparently they're writing again.

00:16:54.840 Mike Benz is all over this on Twitter.

00:16:57.380 You should follow Mike, B-E-N-Z. 1.00

00:16:59.840 He's the one who explains to you how the misinformation media works

00:17:04.860 and how it's part of the intelligence operation

00:17:07.260 so you can see all the gears of the machine.

00:17:09.580 But as he says in his tweets since the Washington Post is attempting a 2.0 attempt

00:17:16.500 after getting blown out last time, watch this masterclass.

00:17:21.780 And so the Washington Post is flailing around to try to create this narrative

00:17:27.400 that in the world there's all this misinformation

00:17:30.600 and there are these good guys forming entities that the government is funding, I guess.

00:17:37.400 And these good guys are the ones who will be like watchdogs against the misinformation.

00:17:42.740 Now what Mike Benz teaches us

00:17:45.260 is that's exactly what our intelligence people do in other countries to control them.

00:17:51.000 We create fake organizations in other countries

00:17:53.780 that seem to be the disinformation seekers,

00:17:57.340 you know, looking for all your disinformation.

00:17:58.780 But in reality, from the start, they're designed to create disinformation.

00:18:04.440 They're just propaganda entities.

00:18:06.900 And now we see that the same system has been fully implemented in the United States,

00:18:12.640 which is completely legal.

00:18:14.340 Apparently it's totally legal at the moment.

00:18:17.780 So the CIA or somebody of that type

00:18:21.540 is working apparently with the Washington Post.

00:18:25.300 That would be the accusation, the allegation.

00:18:27.560 And that they always have.

00:18:30.140 And that the news media and the intelligence people have closed ranks

00:18:37.040 and decided that misinformation only comes from one side of the political sphere.

00:18:43.640 It's just people on the right with all their misinformation.

00:18:45.960 And the people on the left will never know that this is all fake and it's all an op.

00:18:54.980 They'll never know because they don't watch this and they, you know, if they don't follow Mike Benz.

00:18:59.680 If you're not actually following somebody who knows how this stuff works,

00:19:06.480 how in the world would you know?

00:19:08.560 How would you ever know?

00:19:09.680 All right, so every time you see disinformation studies or disinformation researcher,

00:19:18.420 those are your keys that it's a propaganda move.

00:19:22.500 And not just, I want to be clear about this.

00:19:25.220 It's not just something that's happening and I've decided to label it as propaganda.

00:19:29.780 It's propaganda by design from the start with lots of moving parts, right?

00:19:37.720 So we're not interpreting it.

00:19:40.040 It's intended to be this and built to be propaganda.

00:19:44.220 And it's in our country.

00:19:45.920 So our news industry is essentially done.

00:19:48.040 I think I could call the death of the news industry today.

00:19:53.760 You know, I'm not sure what day it died.

00:19:55.440 But we don't have actually a news industry at this point.

00:19:59.780 Let me say that as clearly as possible.

00:20:01.860 We don't actually have a news industry.

00:20:06.860 There's no industry that's called the news anymore.

00:20:09.140 It's only propaganda.

00:20:10.500 Now, that's not to say every member of the news is a propagandist.

00:20:15.520 There are plenty of good people who are trying to break through.

00:20:18.580 But they can't really break the corporate cage.

00:20:23.860 So as long as you work for some big employer, you're pretty much constrained.

00:20:29.860 All right.

00:20:32.080 So we don't have news anymore.

00:20:34.300 That would suggest that people like me will systematically be squashed.

00:20:39.980 Do you see that happening?

00:20:41.200 Do you see people like me being systematically squashed?

00:20:46.500 Well, let's game it through.

00:20:49.520 So I've been cancelled in newspapers and publishing.

00:20:56.420 But I was able to recreate myself within the locals sphere.

00:21:01.560 And also a subscription within the X platform.

00:21:05.720 And I don't know if you know, but the locals platform is part of Rumble.

00:21:11.860 So Rumble is the parent of all that.

00:21:15.940 So as we speak, Rumble is losing its advertising because of Russell Brand.

00:21:24.020 Now, that's the given reason.

00:21:25.660 So Burger King and a few other companies are pulling out their advertising from Rumble

00:21:31.400 because Rumble has not cancelled Russell Brand.

00:21:36.660 Right?

00:21:37.740 But just think about that.

00:21:39.380 Now, if Rumble loses enough advertisers, Rumble goes out of business.

00:21:45.760 If Rumble goes out of business, remember they own the locals platform.

00:21:50.020 The primary way that I can make money because I'm cancelled.

00:21:52.820 So I'm right at the edge, depending how financially strong Rumble is.

00:22:00.040 I also own some stock in Rumble because I had invested in locals

00:22:04.180 and then that got taken over into Rumble.

00:22:06.800 That stock is worth a lot less than it was.

00:22:09.760 Less than half, I think, of where it was.

00:22:12.700 But, so right now Rumble is the last place, along with the X platform,

00:22:18.980 where you could say something that's not approved by the intelligence sensors, basically.

00:22:28.100 And it looks like that's seriously under attack.

00:22:32.420 So if the locals platform goes down with Rumble

00:22:36.460 because there's some organized thing against the advertisers,

00:22:40.640 that would be one of the biggest blows to free speech ever.

00:22:46.840 Ever.

00:22:47.120 But I remind you that the ADL, driven by the Democrats,

00:22:53.040 tried to put Twitter at a business by organizing a boycott.

00:22:58.720 So the other place that I could make money, on the X platform, and I do,

00:23:03.940 is under risk of never being profitable,

00:23:07.740 and therefore it's an existential risk.

00:23:10.340 If you're never profitable, even if you're owned by the richest man in the world,

00:23:14.400 you know, something's going to happen.

00:23:15.440 So the only places that you can be free at the moment,

00:23:20.800 Rumble and Locals, which are the same thing, 0.98

00:23:23.660 and the X platform,

00:23:25.460 are both under massive advertiser pressure

00:23:29.300 and going to have a little trouble being profitable,

00:23:34.880 which means their existence is questionable.

00:23:37.340 So I am actually impressed at the level of completeness

00:23:46.860 of the evil that's happening right now

00:23:48.940 because we've really lost the entire news business.

00:23:53.260 The fact that people on Rumble can still say some things that sound free,

00:23:58.600 how many people on the left will ever hear that?

00:24:03.220 How many people on the left follow me on Locals?

00:24:07.680 Very few.

00:24:09.420 Maybe almost none.

00:24:12.620 How many people on the left follow me on the X platform?

00:24:17.040 Very few.

00:24:20.440 Very, very few.

00:24:21.940 So the first thing you do is make sure that the dissenting voices are walled off

00:24:27.380 because then they're only just talking to themselves,

00:24:30.760 and then you can do whatever you want with the rest of it,

00:24:33.460 which they've done.

00:24:34.620 But then once you've got that,

00:24:36.060 you've taken care of the rest of the media,

00:24:38.300 it's all under your control,

00:24:39.660 which it appears to be.

00:24:40.620 Then you've got to go after the bubble

00:24:43.020 because you don't want the bubble to have a breakout moment.

00:24:46.200 So now you can see that the bubble is being squeezed

00:24:48.500 by the advertisers who are being squeezed

00:24:50.740 by the Democrats who are being squeezed by intelligence people.

00:24:56.200 So it looks like there's something like a complete loss

00:25:02.460 of First Amendment that's coming up. 0.89

00:25:05.400 It's almost complete

00:25:06.820 because I don't have any ability to talk in most of the media.

00:25:11.300 Would you agree?

00:25:12.480 I can get on podcasts,

00:25:14.280 but they have their own little audiences.

00:25:17.260 But do you think that CNN's going to invite me on

00:25:19.460 to give my side of things?

00:25:22.360 I don't think so.

00:25:24.520 The only reason anybody would invite me on,

00:25:27.140 the massive part of the media,

00:25:29.380 would be to try to further degrade me.

00:25:31.880 In other words, it would be hippies.

00:25:34.000 But they would never have me on just to talk.

00:25:36.820 Those days are over.

00:25:39.020 Think about it.

00:25:39.720 Free speech actually is gone

00:25:41.840 except for the few little bubbles

00:25:44.040 that they're exterminating at the moment.

00:25:47.880 That's actually happening in your life.

00:25:51.120 Do you remember some points in your life,

00:25:55.140 you heard stories about the so-called blacklists in Hollywood,

00:26:00.120 you know, back in the dark McCarthy era

00:26:02.460 and people who were being canceled

00:26:04.440 and their lives were ruined

00:26:05.660 for allegedly being communists?

00:26:09.140 Ruined all kinds of lives.

00:26:10.400 Do you remember your thoughts about that

00:26:12.680 when you were reading it about history?

00:26:15.580 I remember mine.

00:26:17.700 Thank God that'll never happen again.

00:26:21.280 That was what I thought.

00:26:22.780 I thought, well, that could never happen,

00:26:24.120 that McCarthyism.

00:26:24.880 And here I am.

00:26:28.220 I got McCarthy'd. 0.93

00:26:29.700 Like, personally.

00:26:30.900 Not only did I not think that it would happen again

00:26:33.320 in the world,

00:26:35.620 I'll tell you the last thing I thought

00:26:37.200 is that it would happen to me personally.

00:26:39.080 I really didn't see that coming.

00:26:41.560 I mean, I knew I was flying close to the sun,

00:26:44.780 but I really didn't think it was going to go

00:26:46.920 full McCarthy and take down free speech in general.

00:26:50.180 I mean, I really didn't see the end of free speech.

00:26:52.980 But here we are.

00:26:54.580 Here we are.

00:26:56.600 All right.

00:26:58.780 Here's some fake news about Newsom.

00:27:02.600 And I'm part of sending out some fake news.

00:27:06.720 So you might know that there was some legislation

00:27:08.880 that Newsom vetoed by not signing it.

00:27:14.200 And the thing he vetoed would have given

00:27:17.260 essentially preference to the parent

00:27:22.000 in a custody dispute,

00:27:23.940 preference to the parent

00:27:25.060 who accepted the gender assignment of their child.

00:27:29.080 In other words, what the child said they were,

00:27:31.420 if the parent accepted that,

00:27:32.680 they were more likely to have custody.

00:27:35.240 And the law would say

00:27:36.800 that should be taken into account.

00:27:39.060 Now, Newsom declined to sign that.

00:27:41.620 And people like me were fooled.

00:27:43.880 I was totally fooled.

00:27:45.340 And thought, oh, wow.

00:27:47.620 He's moderating because he's thinking about running

00:27:50.240 for a higher office.

00:27:52.120 So he can't be so left,

00:27:53.800 he would do something that was so,

00:27:55.800 just way over the line.

00:27:58.020 So he's got to moderate that

00:27:59.620 to run for national office.

00:28:01.480 That's what I thought.

00:28:03.580 I was very wrong.

00:28:05.920 That's not what happened at all.

00:28:08.000 That didn't happen.

00:28:09.180 It was a weasel trick.

00:28:10.260 Now, Joel Pollack points that out.

00:28:14.860 And the weasel trick

00:28:16.600 was that in his veto letter,

00:28:22.300 Newsom said that he vetoed it,

00:28:25.440 and in part,

00:28:27.040 because it's already the current process,

00:28:30.240 that the current rules and regulations

00:28:32.420 allows you to take into account

00:28:34.240 which parent was the one

00:28:37.280 who accepted the gender assignment

00:28:38.880 as one of many variables.

00:28:42.360 So Newsom did not veto something.

00:28:46.200 He simply said it's already the case.

00:28:49.060 That's really different than vetoing something.

00:28:52.100 You didn't need a new law

00:28:53.300 when it was basically the way

00:28:55.320 people are already acting.

00:28:56.500 Oh, that was a good weasel. 0.99

00:28:59.560 Now, I have to say,

00:29:01.220 what percentage of the voters

00:29:02.940 would be aware that this law happened

00:29:06.020 and then he vetoed it at all?

00:29:08.080 Not many.

00:29:09.380 10% maximum?

00:29:11.520 Do you think not even?

00:29:13.000 5%?

00:29:14.040 5% maybe?

00:29:15.540 Were even aware that he vetoed something?

00:29:18.120 And then of the 5% who were aware

00:29:20.100 he vetoed it,

00:29:21.660 what percentage of the 5%

00:29:23.820 found out later that it was a trick?

00:29:26.940 He wasn't really vetoing anything

00:29:28.580 because it was already the process.

00:29:31.300 Probably 1% of 5%.

00:29:33.860 I think it's hard for those of you

00:29:37.720 who watch this content every day,

00:29:40.500 it's hard for you to understand

00:29:42.280 how little the public knows about anything

00:29:45.180 in terms of politics.

00:29:47.640 I mean, I'm barely keeping my nose

00:29:51.260 just above the waterline

00:29:52.660 with all the legal stuff,

00:29:55.000 you know, trying to figure out

00:29:56.020 who's suing who for what

00:29:57.420 and who got indicted where for what.

00:29:59.600 It's, like, really hard for non-lawyers

00:30:01.820 to keep that straight.

00:30:02.980 If you're a lawyer,

00:30:03.800 you're probably in pretty good shape.

00:30:05.280 But for the non-lawyers

00:30:06.460 to keep all those different

00:30:07.700 legal shenanigans in your mind,

00:30:10.240 it's almost impossible.

00:30:12.180 So it almost has no effect

00:30:13.860 because it's beyond our ability

00:30:16.000 to process it.

00:30:16.860 We can't put it in a box.

00:30:19.120 So those are three really obvious

00:30:27.600 examples of fake news.

00:30:30.480 Is any of the news real?

00:30:32.460 I don't think so.

00:30:34.060 I don't think any of it is real.

00:30:35.800 Why would it be?

00:30:37.540 Once the intelligence agencies

00:30:39.220 can completely control the news,

00:30:41.620 which is largely the case,

00:30:44.020 why would they ever do real news?

00:30:47.620 What would be even the point of it?

00:30:49.520 There would be no real point of it.

00:30:51.420 It would be all narrative.

00:30:54.180 All right.

00:30:56.060 I saw some disagreement online

00:30:57.860 about the current divorce rate.

00:31:00.260 So I Googled it to find out what it is.

00:31:03.320 Let me ask you,

00:31:04.320 what do you think is the current divorce rate

00:31:06.740 of people married for the first time?

00:31:09.820 Give me your estimate before I tell you.

00:31:12.460 What percentage of people who marry

00:31:14.080 for the first time

00:31:15.080 eventually get divorced?

00:31:18.680 All right.

00:31:19.400 Answers are all over the board.

00:31:22.340 Somebody said 100%,

00:31:23.760 but I think that's, you know,

00:31:24.940 you always die. 0.92

00:31:27.780 The answer, according to Google,

00:31:30.820 the answer is between 30 and 50%

00:31:33.280 of first marriages end in divorce,

00:31:35.420 or 35 to 50.

00:31:37.100 Isn't that too big of a range?

00:31:38.740 How in the world would we not know

00:31:41.800 how many first marriages

00:31:43.940 have ended in divorce so far?

00:31:46.540 I guess you've got to estimate

00:31:47.760 the ones that are married

00:31:48.740 that have not yet.

00:31:50.580 So how exactly do you do that?

00:31:54.920 That's sort of a big range.

00:31:57.440 All right.

00:31:58.380 So up to half of first marriages

00:32:00.480 end in divorce. 0.74

00:32:01.340 That would be on the high side,

00:32:02.600 half.

00:32:03.600 Well, second marriages,

00:32:04.600 all right,

00:32:05.740 let's see if you know this fact.

00:32:07.900 Are second marriages

00:32:08.860 more likely

00:32:09.680 or less likely

00:32:10.520 to divorce?

00:32:12.260 More likely

00:32:12.920 or less likely?

00:32:17.380 It's way more likely,

00:32:19.740 like a lot more likely.

00:32:21.960 So second marriages 0.86

00:32:22.880 have a higher divorce rate

00:32:24.080 of 60 to 70%.

00:32:25.580 Almost 70%

00:32:28.660 of second marriages.

00:32:30.560 Do you know why

00:32:31.460 that makes sense?

00:32:34.600 Because my theory is

00:32:36.040 that people who are good

00:32:38.080 to be married to

00:32:39.260 are always good

00:32:41.380 to be married to.

00:32:42.960 And people who are not

00:32:44.140 good to be married to

00:32:45.260 for anybody

00:32:46.120 are never going to be

00:32:48.420 good to be married to.

00:32:49.920 So a lot of the people

00:32:51.080 who get divorced

00:32:51.700 is because nobody

00:32:52.700 could be married

00:32:53.360 to that person.

00:32:55.000 No, we can, nobody.

00:32:56.660 It's not,

00:32:57.360 it's not a compatibility thing.

00:32:59.440 No, no.

00:32:59.960 It's not about your chemistry.

00:33:01.620 It's not about

00:33:02.500 whether you went to,

00:33:03.420 you know,

00:33:04.440 divorce counseling.

00:33:06.960 Now, there are some people

00:33:08.540 that nobody should marry. 0.95

00:33:11.280 A lot of them.

00:33:12.740 And after they get divorced,

00:33:14.240 well, what's the second thing

00:33:15.440 going to be?

00:33:16.140 They get divorced again

00:33:17.240 and they just find out again.

00:33:19.900 Yeah.

00:33:20.980 So,

00:33:22.260 marriage is a system

00:33:23.560 that you would never design.

00:33:26.540 Well, let me put it this way.

00:33:27.760 If you were going to design

00:33:29.440 a system that was

00:33:30.440 the main operating system

00:33:32.080 for society

00:33:32.880 and marriage is that

00:33:35.060 still.

00:33:37.800 On paper,

00:33:39.440 wouldn't the current system,

00:33:40.900 the way it exists,

00:33:42.100 the financial part,

00:33:43.500 the way people are,

00:33:45.000 you know,

00:33:45.180 their opportunities,

00:33:46.360 on paper,

00:33:47.520 this wouldn't work,

00:33:48.360 would it?

00:33:49.140 If there were no such thing

00:33:50.300 as marriage

00:33:50.740 and nobody had heard of it

00:33:51.700 and you had a chance

00:33:53.100 to design it

00:33:53.920 and you designed it

00:33:55.740 and you showed it to people,

00:33:56.820 they'd look at it

00:33:57.460 and they'd say,

00:33:57.880 well,

00:33:59.040 this couldn't work.

00:34:00.480 How in the world

00:34:01.060 would this work?

00:34:02.480 This is the worst idea

00:34:03.500 I've ever seen.

00:34:04.720 On paper,

00:34:05.900 you would never approve

00:34:07.300 this plan.

00:34:08.800 You know,

00:34:09.020 but we got there

00:34:10.000 through history.

00:34:13.200 And I don't think

00:34:14.200 that people understand

00:34:15.200 that marriage was 0.99

00:34:16.540 historically,

00:34:18.320 you know,

00:34:18.880 for economic reasons

00:34:20.200 and to make sure

00:34:21.120 that you were really

00:34:21.820 the father

00:34:22.340 and some protection reasons

00:34:24.100 and there's just

00:34:25.020 completely different reasons.

00:34:27.000 You know,

00:34:27.200 today you're supposed

00:34:27.900 to get married

00:34:28.460 because it feels good.

00:34:31.020 Am I wrong?

00:34:33.380 Marriage was designed 0.58

00:34:34.600 as a utility.

00:34:36.420 It was about

00:34:37.080 keeping you alive

00:34:38.120 and making sure

00:34:38.960 your economics worked

00:34:40.080 and protecting your unit

00:34:41.880 and stuff like that.

00:34:43.060 Making sure you had

00:34:43.800 somebody to take care

00:34:44.880 of you when you're old.

00:34:46.780 So those are

00:34:47.580 pretty much economic.

00:34:48.860 But somewhere along the line

00:34:50.000 we got sold on the idea

00:34:51.420 that it's something

00:34:54.360 about God.

00:34:56.560 You know,

00:34:56.740 that was always part of it.

00:34:58.060 But it's more about

00:34:59.220 how you feel.

00:35:01.720 You know,

00:35:01.920 do you feel complete?

00:35:04.180 How in the world

00:35:04.920 is that going to work?

00:35:07.340 So we have a process

00:35:08.860 that was designed

00:35:09.600 for utility,

00:35:10.780 but we're told

00:35:11.980 that we should use it

00:35:12.940 because of the way

00:35:13.520 it makes us feel,

00:35:14.680 but it wasn't really

00:35:15.580 designed to make you

00:35:16.440 feel good.

00:35:18.300 I mean,

00:35:18.620 it does have that quality

00:35:19.680 for a lot of people,

00:35:20.680 but it wasn't really

00:35:22.180 designed to do that.

00:35:23.800 It's just not

00:35:24.400 the point of it.

00:35:25.640 So it would be weird

00:35:26.620 if it did

00:35:27.140 because that would be

00:35:28.180 a coincidence,

00:35:29.080 not a design.

00:35:31.220 All right,

00:35:31.520 well,

00:35:31.700 there's a poll,

00:35:32.680 ABC,

00:35:33.240 Washington Post poll

00:35:34.040 that shows Donald Trump

00:35:35.760 leading Biden

00:35:36.400 by 10 points.

00:35:37.920 What does it tell you

00:35:39.200 when there's one poll

00:35:40.620 that's way different

00:35:41.540 than the others

00:35:42.160 because the other polls

00:35:43.100 are closer to even?

00:35:45.220 But it could be

00:35:46.860 because it's newer.

00:35:49.500 Did something happen

00:35:50.540 in the last two weeks

00:35:51.960 that would have changed

00:35:54.100 things this much?

00:35:57.980 Did I tell you

00:35:58.960 it's a Washington Post

00:36:00.180 ABC poll?

00:36:02.080 Washington Post,

00:36:03.300 what do you know

00:36:04.120 from that?

00:36:06.040 All right.

00:36:06.920 So this is probably

00:36:08.220 what the intelligence

00:36:09.840 people in the country

00:36:10.860 want you to think

00:36:11.740 because it comes

00:36:12.940 to the Washington Post.

00:36:13.880 and they would like you

00:36:18.760 to think that Trump

00:36:19.560 will absolutely

00:36:20.640 clobber Biden

00:36:21.920 in the election.

00:36:23.720 Why would anybody

00:36:25.340 who is on Biden's side

00:36:27.900 want to release a poll

00:36:29.840 that says he's going

00:36:30.580 to get absolutely trounced?

00:36:33.620 Because they're trying

00:36:34.520 to remove him.

00:36:36.360 Obviously.

00:36:37.460 Obviously,

00:36:37.940 they're trying to remove him

00:36:39.260 early enough

00:36:40.420 that they can get

00:36:41.100 somebody else in.

00:36:42.700 What else could it be?

00:36:44.860 What else could it be?

00:36:46.400 Oh, oh, I know.

00:36:48.120 Stop it.

00:36:48.880 Stop it.

00:36:49.340 You're going to say

00:36:49.800 what else it could be

00:36:50.920 is that that's the data.

00:36:54.460 Right?

00:36:55.220 One possibility is

00:36:56.540 well, that's just

00:36:57.080 that's how the poll

00:36:58.120 came out.

00:36:59.200 There's no clever plan

00:37:01.220 or intention.

00:37:02.340 They just did a poll

00:37:03.340 and it's wildly different

00:37:05.120 than the other polls

00:37:05.980 but, you know,

00:37:07.240 sometimes that happens.

00:37:08.320 Does anybody believe

00:37:10.620 that this would have

00:37:12.380 seen the light of day,

00:37:13.700 this poll,

00:37:15.140 unless the people

00:37:16.140 in charge

00:37:16.780 thought it

00:37:17.480 helped their narrative?

00:37:20.460 Now,

00:37:21.100 do you know

00:37:21.580 what would have happened

00:37:22.240 under normal times

00:37:23.340 if you saw a poll

00:37:24.400 that so wildly disagreed

00:37:25.940 with the other polls?

00:37:27.220 Do you know

00:37:27.640 what would happen?

00:37:29.860 You would say

00:37:30.600 you did it wrong

00:37:31.240 and you'd throw it away.

00:37:33.060 Now, I don't know

00:37:33.900 that that's true

00:37:34.640 but I'll bet

00:37:35.740 if you talk to Rasmussen

00:37:37.100 or you talk to

00:37:38.280 somebody who's

00:37:39.360 just a pollster,

00:37:40.720 right,

00:37:40.920 they're not political,

00:37:41.720 they're just pollsters

00:37:42.380 and you said

00:37:43.520 if your poll came back

00:37:45.140 and it was wildly different,

00:37:47.120 10 points is wildly different

00:37:48.640 than the other polls,

00:37:50.300 all of the other polls,

00:37:51.680 not just some

00:37:52.300 but all of the other polls

00:37:53.580 and you're wildly different,

00:37:55.660 do you just publish

00:37:56.480 that fucking thing?

00:37:58.360 You tell me.

00:37:59.780 Those of you

00:38:00.540 who have any kind

00:38:01.360 of experience

00:38:01.900 in the real world,

00:38:03.240 do you publish that?

00:38:04.100 No,

00:38:06.700 not in the real world.

00:38:08.440 In the real world,

00:38:09.520 you assume it's wrong.

00:38:11.620 You assume it's wrong.

00:38:13.480 You might poll again

00:38:14.600 to see if you got

00:38:15.860 the same example

00:38:16.440 but you're not

00:38:17.240 going to publish that.

00:38:19.020 You would never publish that

00:38:20.700 if your job

00:38:21.960 was just polling.

00:38:24.380 That's my contention.

00:38:26.120 That no professional

00:38:27.460 would publish a poll

00:38:29.140 that was wildly

00:38:30.280 outside the bounds

00:38:31.280 of all the other polls.

00:38:33.940 You would pull it back

00:38:35.800 and you'd say

00:38:37.040 we'd better

00:38:37.600 take a week off

00:38:38.900 because next week

00:38:40.780 it'll either still be there

00:38:42.040 in which case

00:38:42.920 we've confirmed it's real

00:38:45.100 or by next week

00:38:46.740 we'll find out

00:38:47.260 it's not there

00:38:47.840 because we try again

00:38:49.400 and it's just not there.

00:38:50.860 But nobody would publish

00:38:52.500 that poll

00:38:53.240 for news purposes.

00:38:58.240 You just wouldn't do it.

00:38:59.480 So you would have

00:39:01.480 to have some other purpose.

00:39:03.400 What would be

00:39:04.100 the other purpose?

00:39:07.200 It's obvious.

00:39:08.400 The other purpose

00:39:09.140 would be to

00:39:09.800 discourage Biden

00:39:11.520 from running.

00:39:12.980 It's very obvious.

00:39:15.440 All right.

00:39:18.460 And of course

00:39:19.120 Biden was down

00:39:20.240 on all of the

00:39:21.220 various issues.

00:39:23.060 Let's see if you can guess

00:39:24.300 the result on this one.

00:39:26.460 Asked about Biden's

00:39:27.600 handling of immigration

00:39:28.680 situation at the border.

00:39:31.200 What percentage of people

00:39:32.580 said they approve

00:39:33.700 of Biden's handling

00:39:35.240 of immigration

00:39:35.940 at the border?

00:39:36.740 Oh yeah.

00:39:37.240 Good guess.

00:39:38.260 It's 23%.

00:39:39.540 23%.

00:39:41.320 And once again

00:39:43.220 my audience

00:39:43.820 is so smart.

00:39:45.520 They knew the answer

00:39:46.360 before I asked

00:39:47.720 the question.

00:39:48.900 Yeah.

00:39:49.260 That's how we roll here.

00:39:52.380 Well Microsoft

00:39:53.380 is going into

00:39:54.820 the nuclear

00:39:55.700 power business.

00:39:59.160 Did you see

00:39:59.900 that coming?

00:40:01.240 Microsoft

00:40:01.680 the company

00:40:02.320 is going hard.

00:40:05.000 They're not just

00:40:05.620 tiptoeing it.

00:40:06.220 They're going hard

00:40:07.020 into building

00:40:08.620 nuclear reactors.

00:40:09.700 Do you know why?

00:40:13.400 It's the only way

00:40:14.440 that they can power

00:40:15.340 their data centers

00:40:16.240 in a green way.

00:40:18.400 It was the only way.

00:40:19.540 So Microsoft

00:40:21.700 is all in

00:40:23.380 on nuclear

00:40:24.020 being green

00:40:24.720 and they're all in

00:40:26.360 on micro reactors

00:40:27.860 and modular reactors.

00:40:29.960 How do you get

00:40:31.220 nuclear approved

00:40:32.740 in a country

00:40:33.540 that takes

00:40:34.580 20 years

00:40:35.080 to approve anything?

00:40:36.360 You make it modular

00:40:37.740 and you make it micro.

00:40:40.280 So those were

00:40:41.040 always the paths.

00:40:43.340 The reason

00:40:44.120 the companies

00:40:44.600 didn't do it

00:40:45.160 is they didn't

00:40:45.980 have the

00:40:46.460 cover.

00:40:48.640 They couldn't

00:40:49.700 do it.

00:40:50.520 Partly the technology

00:40:51.740 had to develop

00:40:52.380 to a certain point

00:40:53.120 but partly

00:40:54.180 it would just

00:40:55.100 be too hard

00:40:55.900 to be a corporation

00:40:56.820 and say you were

00:40:57.480 going to do

00:40:57.800 something with nuclear.

00:40:59.040 You would just

00:40:59.500 get hammered.

00:41:01.160 But apparently

00:41:02.380 the message

00:41:03.900 that nuclear

00:41:04.560 is green

00:41:05.520 and not just green

00:41:06.940 is your only hope.

00:41:09.480 It's like your

00:41:10.600 only hope for green.

00:41:12.160 It's the only thing

00:41:12.800 you can do

00:41:13.240 maybe fast enough

00:41:14.380 and big enough

00:41:14.980 and reliable enough.

00:41:16.980 Now of course

00:41:17.360 I think Elon Musk

00:41:18.180 would say

00:41:18.560 you could get there

00:41:19.440 with solar

00:41:20.200 and batteries.

00:41:22.460 But I still

00:41:23.360 need to see

00:41:23.900 a debate

00:41:24.580 on nuclear

00:41:25.940 versus solar

00:41:27.360 plus batteries

00:41:28.120 alone.

00:41:30.540 It's entirely

00:41:31.520 possible that

00:41:35.000 Musk is right

00:41:35.800 and that

00:41:36.380 solar plus batteries

00:41:37.780 gets you a better

00:41:38.500 end state

00:41:38.980 but I'd love to see

00:41:40.520 that argument.

00:41:42.280 And part of the

00:41:42.760 reason that you

00:41:43.640 can't be sure

00:41:44.360 is that you don't

00:41:45.780 know what happens

00:41:46.460 with the economics

00:41:47.220 of solar

00:41:47.820 in five years.

00:41:49.720 In five years

00:41:50.780 there could be

00:41:51.180 a breakthrough

00:41:51.680 that doubles

00:41:52.680 capacity

00:41:53.340 or gives you

00:41:54.840 aluminum based

00:41:55.720 batteries instead

00:41:56.600 of lithium

00:41:57.080 and suddenly

00:41:58.120 all the economics

00:41:58.980 are completely

00:41:59.540 different.

00:42:00.480 So both

00:42:01.160 nuclear and

00:42:02.300 solar

00:42:02.740 could undergo

00:42:04.280 massive,

00:42:05.340 massive changes

00:42:06.480 in economics

00:42:07.320 in the next

00:42:08.760 five to ten years

00:42:09.440 and they could

00:42:10.400 leapfrog each other.

00:42:11.720 It could be that

00:42:12.500 they're kind of

00:42:13.280 similar now

00:42:14.100 but one

00:42:15.220 innovation makes

00:42:16.240 solar ten times

00:42:18.040 as good

00:42:18.480 but it only

00:42:19.440 lasts for a few

00:42:20.100 years

00:42:20.480 and then somebody

00:42:21.560 figures out

00:42:22.200 how to make

00:42:22.700 modular

00:42:23.720 Gen 4

00:42:24.800 nuclear stuff

00:42:25.900 get a government

00:42:27.060 approval

00:42:27.520 for every state

00:42:28.960 to override

00:42:30.120 the state

00:42:30.520 approvals

00:42:31.020 and suddenly

00:42:32.200 nuclear is

00:42:33.160 a hundred times

00:42:33.880 better

00:42:34.180 than the best

00:42:36.320 solar.

00:42:37.600 So I don't

00:42:38.200 think that anybody

00:42:38.900 is smart enough

00:42:39.780 to do an

00:42:41.020 economic projection

00:42:42.140 of which of

00:42:43.000 those technologies

00:42:43.820 will be the

00:42:44.420 winner in

00:42:45.820 15 years.

00:42:47.660 There's no way

00:42:48.200 to do it.

00:42:48.700 It's just not

00:42:49.080 it's an undoable

00:42:50.800 projection.

00:42:53.220 So do both.

00:42:54.240 That's the only

00:42:54.700 answer.

00:42:56.260 Well there's a

00:42:57.000 fourth whistleblower

00:42:58.000 saying that

00:43:00.220 Garland or

00:43:01.540 the DOJ

00:43:02.500 were slow

00:43:03.840 walking and

00:43:04.580 trying to

00:43:05.080 thwart any

00:43:05.800 investigations

00:43:08.160 into Hunter

00:43:09.580 Biden.

00:43:09.860 So I would

00:43:11.860 say at this

00:43:12.280 point we have

00:43:12.820 complete

00:43:13.340 confirmation

00:43:13.860 that the

00:43:16.080 Garland

00:43:17.180 organization

00:43:18.560 A.G.

00:43:19.780 Garland

00:43:20.100 was trying

00:43:22.060 to slow

00:43:22.820 down or

00:43:23.360 stop or

00:43:23.900 thwart the

00:43:24.420 investigation.

00:43:25.900 But listen

00:43:26.300 to what

00:43:26.960 Garland

00:43:27.440 says.

00:43:30.400 He's trying

00:43:31.180 to answer

00:43:31.500 the question

00:43:32.060 if he said

00:43:33.880 that the

00:43:34.380 prosecutor

00:43:35.020 I guess it

00:43:36.160 was Weiss

00:43:36.600 had all the

00:43:37.680 authority he

00:43:38.440 needed but

00:43:40.100 yet Weiss

00:43:40.640 seemed to

00:43:41.320 not act like

00:43:42.260 he had all

00:43:42.680 the authority

00:43:43.160 he needed

00:43:43.640 and indeed

00:43:44.980 he had to

00:43:45.580 get more

00:43:45.900 authority as

00:43:46.500 he has now.

00:43:47.740 So Garland

00:43:49.060 was asked

00:43:49.560 about that

00:43:50.140 and so

00:43:54.240 Jim Jordan

00:43:54.820 asked him

00:43:55.340 he said

00:43:56.040 you told

00:44:01.040 the Senate

00:44:02.360 under oath

00:44:03.060 that Weiss

00:44:04.040 had complete

00:44:05.000 authority

00:44:05.500 and that

00:44:09.320 no one

00:44:09.660 had authority

00:44:10.220 to turn

00:44:10.680 him down

00:44:11.160 but they

00:44:12.900 could refuse

00:44:13.460 to partner

00:44:14.060 with him

00:44:14.500 Garland

00:44:14.840 said.

00:44:15.820 So here's

00:44:16.340 Garland's

00:44:16.840 answer

00:44:17.320 that Weiss

00:44:20.440 had all

00:44:21.000 the authority

00:44:21.740 so long

00:44:23.240 as the

00:44:24.480 people in

00:44:24.920 the states

00:44:25.560 agreed to

00:44:27.100 work with

00:44:27.860 him.

00:44:28.600 But since

00:44:29.840 they had the

00:44:30.420 total power

00:44:31.100 to not agree

00:44:31.980 it to work

00:44:32.400 with him

00:44:32.740 that's what

00:44:34.100 happened.

00:44:35.500 So yes

00:44:35.900 it was true 0.69

00:44:36.620 that he had

00:44:37.000 all the

00:44:37.420 authority he

00:44:38.000 needed so

00:44:39.340 long as

00:44:39.820 states with

00:44:40.560 their own

00:44:40.880 authority which

00:44:41.640 would be

00:44:41.900 separate so

00:44:43.140 long as they

00:44:43.620 were working

00:44:44.080 with him.

00:44:44.720 But they

00:44:45.420 had also the

00:44:46.200 power to

00:44:46.700 just say

00:44:47.080 no.

00:44:48.460 And they

00:44:49.040 said no

00:44:49.480 we won't

00:44:49.860 work with

00:44:50.260 you.

00:44:51.900 And then

00:44:52.320 Garland

00:44:52.960 Garland

00:44:55.240 explained he

00:44:55.900 says you

00:44:56.620 can use

00:44:57.040 whatever

00:44:57.380 language

00:44:58.000 you know

00:44:59.060 refuse to

00:45:00.020 partner is

00:45:00.580 turning down

00:45:01.120 oh Jordan

00:45:01.600 said that.

00:45:02.660 So Jordan

00:45:03.040 says it's

00:45:03.520 the same

00:45:04.320 thing.

00:45:04.960 That's the

00:45:05.260 same as

00:45:05.560 saying you

00:45:05.880 don't have

00:45:06.320 the authority.

00:45:07.280 If you

00:45:07.780 can't do

00:45:08.340 it you

00:45:09.320 don't have

00:45:09.680 the authority.

00:45:11.180 And Garland

00:45:11.600 tried to

00:45:12.040 weasel it and

00:45:12.460 say you

00:45:12.680 do have

00:45:12.980 the authority

00:45:13.480 but other

00:45:14.800 people have

00:45:15.640 the authority

00:45:16.100 not to

00:45:16.540 help you

00:45:16.940 which

00:45:17.220 effectively

00:45:17.800 stops you.

00:45:19.520 And he

00:45:19.720 tried to

00:45:20.100 sell that.

00:45:22.960 And he

00:45:23.560 actually said

00:45:24.120 that it's

00:45:25.180 not the

00:45:25.540 same under

00:45:26.040 well known

00:45:26.560 Justice

00:45:26.900 Department

00:45:27.340 practice

00:45:27.860 Garland

00:45:28.260 claimed.

00:45:29.160 Now if

00:45:29.680 you and I

00:45:30.120 are watching

00:45:30.580 this we

00:45:31.640 don't know

00:45:32.140 what well

00:45:33.020 established

00:45:33.620 Justice

00:45:34.360 Department

00:45:34.920 policies are.

00:45:36.600 So you

00:45:36.940 just hear

00:45:37.280 this and

00:45:37.660 you go

00:45:37.860 I don't

00:45:38.660 know.

00:45:40.440 But to

00:45:41.000 me it

00:45:41.320 sounds

00:45:41.640 exactly like

00:45:42.600 they were

00:45:42.980 thwarting

00:45:43.400 him.

00:45:43.760 And I

00:45:43.940 think the

00:45:44.200 whistleblowers 1.00

00:45:44.720 are being

00:45:45.940 completely

00:45:46.440 accurate on

00:45:47.280 this.

00:45:48.060 That's my

00:45:48.480 take.

00:45:50.420 So if

00:45:51.240 you're

00:45:51.420 wondering if

00:45:51.960 the Department

00:45:52.580 of Justice

00:45:53.120 and Garland

00:45:54.120 were crooked

00:45:54.960 I would say

00:45:55.960 that's

00:45:56.240 confirmed.

00:45:58.200 Does that

00:45:58.480 feel fair

00:46:01.260 enough?

00:46:02.140 I would

00:46:02.480 say that

00:46:02.920 four

00:46:03.440 whistleblowers 1.00

00:46:04.160 and then

00:46:04.760 listening to

00:46:05.400 him explain

00:46:05.860 himself would

00:46:06.880 confirm that

00:46:07.500 he's crooked. 0.73

00:46:09.960 And it's

00:46:10.780 funny that we

00:46:11.280 can say that

00:46:11.780 with confidence.

00:46:13.620 You don't

00:46:14.260 even have to

00:46:14.760 wonder at this

00:46:15.400 point.

00:46:16.000 You know

00:46:16.120 everybody's

00:46:16.600 innocent until

00:46:17.140 proven guilty

00:46:17.800 but I'd say

00:46:18.700 he's proven

00:46:19.200 guilty.

00:46:20.920 He was

00:46:21.460 innocent in

00:46:21.940 my mind

00:46:22.480 until four

00:46:25.120 whistleblowers 1.00

00:46:25.780 said he

00:46:26.140 wasn't and

00:46:26.760 then we

00:46:27.020 heard his

00:46:27.340 explanation and

00:46:28.240 it was

00:46:28.380 obviously

00:46:28.780 bullshit.

00:46:29.940 So under

00:46:30.440 this conditions

00:46:31.280 yeah he's

00:46:31.800 proven guilty.

00:46:32.600 He's corrupt.

00:46:33.900 Absolutely.

00:46:36.200 Think about

00:46:36.960 the fact that

00:46:37.540 he could have

00:46:37.940 been on the

00:46:38.560 Supreme Court.

00:46:40.200 He could have

00:46:41.100 been on the

00:46:41.560 Supreme Court

00:46:42.300 and we have

00:46:43.740 confirmation that

00:46:44.640 he's corrupt.

00:46:46.500 Confirmation.

00:46:47.660 It's right here.

00:46:49.200 It's in the

00:46:49.600 news.

00:46:50.120 It's on every

00:46:50.720 news site.

00:46:52.480 And he could

00:46:53.080 have been on

00:46:53.460 the Supreme

00:46:53.900 Court.

00:46:55.000 Unbelievable.

00:46:56.680 Well what

00:46:57.380 other fuckery is 1.00

00:46:58.360 happening?

00:46:59.600 There's a

00:47:00.140 how many

00:47:01.360 scientific papers

00:47:02.960 do you think

00:47:04.680 were let's say

00:47:05.600 withdrawn or

00:47:06.460 retracted in

00:47:08.140 2002?

00:47:09.540 Of course there's

00:47:10.080 lots of papers.

00:47:11.500 So the answer

00:47:12.000 is in 2002

00:47:12.800 there were

00:47:13.200 119

00:47:14.280 studies

00:47:15.620 that turned

00:47:17.320 out to have

00:47:18.460 been published

00:47:19.100 and peer

00:47:19.500 reviewed but

00:47:20.740 later turned

00:47:21.300 out to be

00:47:22.000 flawed or

00:47:23.700 absolutely

00:47:24.260 fake.

00:47:25.400 119 of

00:47:26.260 them in

00:47:26.600 2002.

00:47:27.260 That's a

00:47:27.560 lot.

00:47:29.160 Right?

00:47:30.400 It feels

00:47:30.860 like a lot.

00:47:31.480 119.

00:47:32.700 So that was

00:47:33.220 in 2002.

00:47:34.600 How many

00:47:35.100 do you think

00:47:35.580 were retracted

00:47:36.380 in 2022?

00:47:38.000 Last year.

00:47:42.100 5,500.

00:47:44.600 5,500 faulty

00:47:46.160 papers were

00:47:46.840 retracted.

00:47:47.400 Now do you

00:47:48.540 know why the

00:47:48.940 number wasn't

00:47:49.500 higher?

00:47:51.440 Because there's

00:47:52.440 a team of

00:47:53.180 people looking

00:47:53.920 for fake

00:47:54.820 papers.

00:47:56.320 A little

00:47:56.900 small team.

00:47:59.440 Let's see.

00:48:00.180 The Data

00:48:00.640 Collada is

00:48:01.880 the name of

00:48:02.220 the little

00:48:02.740 group.

00:48:03.560 And there's

00:48:03.980 scientists who

00:48:04.600 are just

00:48:04.820 looking through

00:48:05.320 the literature

00:48:05.780 to find the

00:48:06.380 fake ones and

00:48:07.380 then surfacing

00:48:08.320 them and

00:48:08.920 they're getting

00:48:09.640 retracted.

00:48:11.540 Now it

00:48:12.920 looks like it's

00:48:13.440 only I think

00:48:14.680 three people

00:48:15.380 primarily and

00:48:17.540 there were

00:48:17.800 5,500 papers

00:48:19.200 retracted.

00:48:21.220 What if the

00:48:21.960 people looking

00:48:22.620 for fakes

00:48:23.420 were as

00:48:25.400 well funded

00:48:25.980 as Ukraine

00:48:27.200 or climate

00:48:28.700 science or

00:48:29.420 any of that?

00:48:30.460 Imagine if

00:48:31.140 there were

00:48:31.520 imagine if

00:48:33.480 the people

00:48:34.680 were looking

00:48:35.140 for racism

00:48:35.780 like the

00:48:36.240 ADL.

00:48:37.100 They find it

00:48:38.060 everywhere,

00:48:38.540 don't they?

00:48:39.540 Because they're

00:48:40.160 paid to look

00:48:40.660 for it.

00:48:42.020 So if you're

00:48:42.900 paid to look

00:48:43.400 for something,

00:48:43.860 you're going to

00:48:44.140 find it

00:48:44.500 everywhere.

00:48:45.380 But these

00:48:46.400 three people

00:48:47.100 who were

00:48:47.660 doing it

00:48:48.120 not for

00:48:48.540 money,

00:48:48.880 they seemed

00:48:49.180 to be

00:48:49.440 doing it

00:48:49.820 because it

00:48:50.340 would be

00:48:50.580 good for

00:48:50.900 the world,

00:48:52.080 found 5,500

00:48:53.820 papers or

00:48:54.760 they contributed

00:48:55.680 to the

00:48:56.180 5,500

00:48:57.180 retractions.

00:48:58.940 Now out

00:49:00.280 of 5,500

00:49:01.040 don't you

00:49:02.360 have some

00:49:02.700 questions?

00:49:04.220 Don't you

00:49:04.540 wonder if

00:49:04.920 there was

00:49:05.180 any domain

00:49:05.920 in which

00:49:06.460 there were

00:49:06.740 more fakes?

00:49:09.580 Yeah,

00:49:10.060 you do.

00:49:10.740 You do

00:49:11.320 wonder if

00:49:11.700 there's any

00:49:12.080 domain in

00:49:12.780 which there

00:49:13.080 were more

00:49:13.420 fakes.

00:49:14.280 What about

00:49:14.660 the social

00:49:15.280 sciences?

00:49:17.380 Do you

00:49:17.960 think the

00:49:18.420 psychology

00:49:19.480 related ones

00:49:20.360 were more

00:49:20.800 fake?

00:49:22.100 Of course.

00:49:23.420 Of course

00:49:23.880 they were.

00:49:24.980 Do you

00:49:25.320 think that

00:49:26.140 anything related

00:49:26.980 to vaccinations

00:49:29.100 or climate

00:49:29.960 change,

00:49:31.140 do you think

00:49:31.560 that it might

00:49:31.920 have a little

00:49:32.320 extra fakery

00:49:34.240 in those

00:49:34.580 groups?

00:49:35.060 I don't

00:49:35.300 know.

00:49:36.340 My guess

00:49:37.240 is probably

00:49:37.880 because there's

00:49:39.480 more money

00:49:39.940 involved.

00:49:40.540 Wherever there's

00:49:41.020 more money

00:49:41.500 involved and

00:49:43.380 it's a

00:49:43.680 hotter topic,

00:49:44.380 you'd expect

00:49:45.040 more shenanigans.

00:49:48.760 So that's

00:49:49.720 your situation.

00:49:50.940 I don't know

00:49:51.420 what percentage

00:49:52.080 of papers

00:49:52.620 get retracted.

00:49:53.400 I heard at

00:49:53.820 one point

00:49:54.160 50%,

00:49:54.940 but I felt

00:49:56.020 that was

00:49:56.340 low.

00:49:57.480 The 50% 1.00

00:49:58.540 that were

00:49:58.880 retracted

00:49:59.740 are just

00:50:00.940 the ones

00:50:01.200 somebody

00:50:01.540 caught.

00:50:03.500 It's not

00:50:04.100 like there's

00:50:04.440 somebody

00:50:04.660 looking at

00:50:05.080 all the

00:50:05.380 papers.

00:50:06.180 That's just

00:50:06.800 the ones

00:50:07.160 they caught.

00:50:07.620 I don't

00:50:10.980 trust

00:50:11.760 anything

00:50:12.140 anymore

00:50:12.480 in science.

00:50:17.420 Jonathan

00:50:18.180 Turley is

00:50:19.020 all over

00:50:20.240 this Bob

00:50:21.020 Menendez

00:50:21.540 situation.

00:50:23.000 Bob

00:50:23.380 Menendez,

00:50:24.960 member of

00:50:25.860 Congress,

00:50:26.480 the Senate,

00:50:27.740 sat on the

00:50:28.340 Senate Foreign

00:50:29.080 Intelligence

00:50:29.640 Committee,

00:50:30.240 who was

00:50:30.740 ahead of

00:50:31.120 it,

00:50:31.920 which was

00:50:32.620 also Joe

00:50:33.260 Biden's

00:50:33.660 old job

00:50:34.180 in the

00:50:35.340 Senate.

00:50:36.700 Apparently,

00:50:37.380 it's well

00:50:38.020 understood

00:50:38.500 that if

00:50:39.860 you're in

00:50:40.180 that job,

00:50:40.900 you're

00:50:41.140 dealing with

00:50:41.880 other

00:50:42.260 countries in

00:50:43.660 which bribery

00:50:44.440 is a

00:50:45.020 normal way

00:50:45.640 of business.

00:50:47.980 He was

00:50:49.380 one of

00:50:50.200 the focus

00:50:50.880 points in

00:50:51.640 our

00:50:51.800 government

00:50:52.180 to deal

00:50:53.380 with the

00:50:53.780 countries

00:50:54.180 that bribe.

00:50:56.980 Then it

00:50:57.660 turns out

00:50:58.180 that he

00:50:59.100 was accepting

00:50:59.680 bribes.

00:51:02.420 Of course,

00:51:03.000 we believe

00:51:03.940 that Biden

00:51:05.360 was doing

00:51:07.280 something

00:51:07.600 similar

00:51:08.060 with the

00:51:08.560 Biden

00:51:09.740 crime

00:51:10.120 family.

00:51:11.680 Now,

00:51:12.160 here's the

00:51:12.600 question

00:51:12.900 that

00:51:13.200 Turley

00:51:13.540 asks,

00:51:15.380 and I

00:51:15.720 think it's

00:51:16.060 a pretty

00:51:16.360 fair question.

00:51:17.980 This is

00:51:18.440 not the

00:51:18.820 first time

00:51:19.340 Menendez

00:51:19.840 has been

00:51:20.200 accused

00:51:20.640 of

00:51:21.020 wrongdoing

00:51:22.140 of this

00:51:22.640 nature.

00:51:24.080 He was

00:51:24.720 already

00:51:25.180 highly

00:51:25.640 suspected

00:51:26.220 of being

00:51:26.820 this kind

00:51:27.320 of person,

00:51:29.180 and yet

00:51:29.600 he was

00:51:29.920 put in

00:51:30.400 the job

00:51:30.900 where it

00:51:31.300 would be

00:51:31.600 easiest

00:51:32.040 to be

00:51:32.420 this

00:51:32.660 person.

00:51:33.000 And as

00:51:35.280 Jonathan

00:51:35.640 Turley

00:51:36.060 accurately

00:51:36.740 points out,

00:51:38.540 why would

00:51:38.960 anybody put

00:51:39.980 this specific

00:51:40.820 person in

00:51:42.120 that specific

00:51:42.860 job?

00:51:44.100 Can you

00:51:44.520 think of

00:51:44.960 any reason?

00:51:46.960 I can.

00:51:49.260 Whoever

00:51:49.900 wanted him

00:51:50.600 in that

00:51:50.920 job was

00:51:51.700 getting a

00:51:52.500 taste.

00:51:53.960 Can you

00:51:54.720 think of

00:51:55.020 another

00:51:55.260 reason?

00:51:56.120 Why in

00:51:56.560 the world

00:51:56.900 would you

00:51:57.240 put the

00:51:57.600 most

00:51:58.080 suspected

00:51:59.220 crook

00:52:00.660 in the

00:52:01.320 job

00:52:01.640 where a

00:52:02.400 suspected

00:52:02.900 crook

00:52:03.300 would really

00:52:03.840 like to

00:52:04.260 be,

00:52:05.900 yeah,

00:52:06.320 it had

00:52:06.560 to be

00:52:06.780 intentional.

00:52:07.900 There's

00:52:08.340 no way

00:52:08.900 it was

00:52:09.280 an accident.

00:52:10.700 So you

00:52:11.300 have to

00:52:11.600 assume

00:52:11.900 that anybody

00:52:12.360 who approved

00:52:12.940 it is

00:52:14.780 in on

00:52:15.140 some kind

00:52:15.600 of grift.

00:52:16.580 That would

00:52:16.960 be the

00:52:17.220 reasonable

00:52:17.580 expectation.

00:52:21.620 All

00:52:22.140 right,

00:52:22.580 I'm

00:52:23.460 reminded

00:52:23.880 that in

00:52:24.680 a 2021

00:52:25.320 article,

00:52:26.040 there was

00:52:28.420 a survey

00:52:28.860 that found

00:52:29.320 that 34% 0.89

00:52:30.480 of white

00:52:30.880 students who

00:52:31.360 applied to

00:52:31.800 colleges

00:52:32.300 falsely

00:52:33.780 claimed they

00:52:34.360 were a

00:52:34.760 racial

00:52:35.000 minority.

00:52:38.540 34%.

00:52:39.060 This is

00:52:39.480 in 2021.

00:52:40.480 Why is

00:52:40.840 it not

00:52:41.140 100%?

00:52:43.420 What is

00:52:44.060 wrong with

00:52:44.460 white people?

00:52:47.880 34%

00:52:48.840 would suggest

00:52:49.700 you've got

00:52:50.680 66% of

00:52:51.920 white people

00:52:52.360 who are

00:52:52.560 stupid. 0.90

00:52:54.040 That might

00:52:54.740 be about

00:52:55.080 right.

00:52:56.040 I'm not

00:52:57.560 sure that's

00:52:57.980 wrong.

00:52:59.060 But under

00:53:00.160 today's

00:53:01.180 rules,

00:53:02.820 you would

00:53:03.660 be actually

00:53:04.200 an idiot

00:53:04.680 to say

00:53:06.140 that you

00:53:06.400 were a

00:53:06.600 white person

00:53:07.060 on a

00:53:07.320 college

00:53:07.560 application.

00:53:08.820 Because

00:53:09.340 there's no

00:53:09.720 penalty for

00:53:10.360 being wrong.

00:53:12.060 And

00:53:12.180 apparently

00:53:12.540 the way

00:53:13.740 they're doing

00:53:14.160 it is saying

00:53:14.640 they're Native

00:53:15.040 American like 0.60

00:53:15.820 Elizabeth Warren.

00:53:18.540 Uh-huh.

00:53:19.720 That's the

00:53:20.420 perfect way.

00:53:21.640 Because unless

00:53:22.220 you've got

00:53:22.700 your, you

00:53:23.520 know, unless

00:53:24.420 somebody's going

00:53:24.920 to do some

00:53:25.320 research, to

00:53:27.500 actually go and

00:53:28.240 talk to the

00:53:28.720 tribe that

00:53:29.220 you claim to

00:53:29.760 be a part

00:53:30.180 of, and

00:53:31.040 maybe you

00:53:31.400 don't know

00:53:31.720 what tribe,

00:53:32.340 so you say,

00:53:32.780 I don't know

00:53:33.080 what tribe.

00:53:34.120 And then

00:53:34.440 they'll say,

00:53:34.880 but you're

00:53:35.440 not really

00:53:35.920 Native

00:53:36.180 American unless 0.83

00:53:37.600 a tribe

00:53:38.340 says you

00:53:39.200 are.

00:53:39.460 That's the

00:53:39.720 way it

00:53:39.920 works,

00:53:40.220 right?

00:53:41.240 That's my

00:53:41.780 understanding.

00:53:42.640 You have to

00:53:43.260 be claimed by

00:53:44.140 a tribe or

00:53:44.840 you're not

00:53:45.280 Native

00:53:45.540 American.

00:53:48.200 But if

00:53:49.260 you were

00:53:49.500 filling out

00:53:49.940 these forms,

00:53:50.500 would you

00:53:50.920 care about

00:53:51.400 that distinction?

00:53:52.100 Or would

00:53:53.120 you just

00:53:53.460 say, it's

00:53:54.240 my impression

00:53:54.880 that I'm

00:53:55.440 Native

00:53:55.640 American,

00:53:56.720 because I

00:53:57.080 have Native

00:53:57.420 American

00:53:57.900 ethnicity, and

00:53:59.360 the form is

00:53:59.980 asking me about

00:54:01.480 my identification.

00:54:03.360 It's not

00:54:03.780 asking me who

00:54:04.720 else identifies

00:54:05.440 me.

00:54:06.500 It's not

00:54:06.880 saying, do

00:54:07.400 Native

00:54:07.680 Americans

00:54:08.140 identify you?

00:54:08.900 No.

00:54:09.280 It's asking

00:54:09.800 me what I

00:54:10.440 identify as.

00:54:11.920 So I'm

00:54:12.260 going to

00:54:12.400 identify as

00:54:13.020 Native

00:54:13.220 American, get 0.94

00:54:14.740 myself some

00:54:15.480 money, get

00:54:16.360 accepted into

00:54:17.280 college.

00:54:18.060 You'd be pretty

00:54:18.780 stupid not to

00:54:19.580 do it.

00:54:20.920 I saw a

00:54:21.760 comment, I

00:54:22.720 think it

00:54:22.940 was on

00:54:23.220 Locals.

00:54:26.080 There was

00:54:26.700 somebody who's

00:54:27.260 a pilot who

00:54:28.200 was filling

00:54:28.580 out some

00:54:28.960 internal forums,

00:54:30.000 and it was

00:54:30.660 some white

00:54:31.320 guy claiming

00:54:31.900 to be some

00:54:32.420 other ethnicity,

00:54:33.580 and apparently

00:54:34.300 all the pilots

00:54:34.980 are figuring

00:54:35.480 out that they

00:54:36.080 have to claim

00:54:36.600 to be another

00:54:37.140 ethnicity, too.

00:54:38.420 So the pilots

00:54:39.220 are teaching

00:54:39.660 other pilots

00:54:40.380 how to claim

00:54:41.320 to be not

00:54:41.920 white, and

00:54:43.860 how to get

00:54:44.180 away with it.

00:54:46.680 So let

00:54:47.640 me ask you

00:54:48.020 this.

00:54:49.580 In a

00:54:50.800 world in

00:54:51.320 which we

00:54:52.180 have all

00:54:52.520 this systemic

00:54:53.280 and direct

00:54:54.060 discrimination,

00:54:55.820 why is

00:54:56.280 nobody trying

00:54:56.920 to claim

00:54:57.400 to be

00:54:57.740 white?

00:55:00.040 Do you

00:55:00.680 remember when

00:55:01.180 people tried

00:55:01.720 to pass

00:55:02.380 as white?

00:55:03.840 And I

00:55:04.520 think there's

00:55:04.880 a fairly

00:55:05.180 obvious answer

00:55:05.940 to that

00:55:06.260 question,

00:55:06.960 because being

00:55:07.980 white is 0.89

00:55:08.540 not an

00:55:08.900 advantage.

00:55:10.100 If it

00:55:10.800 were, people

00:55:11.380 would be

00:55:11.780 pretending

00:55:12.160 to be

00:55:12.560 white, but

00:55:13.680 they're

00:55:13.860 pretending

00:55:14.240 to be

00:55:14.620 non-white,

00:55:15.920 because

00:55:16.440 everybody,

00:55:17.700 everybody,

00:55:18.320 knows

00:55:18.980 that's

00:55:19.300 an

00:55:19.440 advantage.

00:55:20.460 Everybody.

00:55:22.040 Anybody who

00:55:22.720 doesn't know

00:55:23.120 that's an

00:55:23.480 advantage in

00:55:24.020 2023 is a

00:55:25.740 fucking idiot 0.74

00:55:26.260 at this

00:55:26.700 point.

00:55:29.380 So 77%

00:55:32.860 of the

00:55:33.200 white applicants

00:55:33.780 who lied

00:55:34.260 about their

00:55:34.660 race and 0.82

00:55:35.040 their

00:55:35.140 applications

00:55:35.540 were accepted

00:55:36.220 to those

00:55:36.680 colleges.

00:55:40.100 Interesting.

00:55:41.860 So now I'm

00:55:42.860 going to go to

00:55:43.220 the white

00:55:43.500 board, and I'm

00:55:45.480 going to tell

00:55:45.840 you where

00:55:46.140 things are

00:55:46.600 headed.

00:55:46.860 You ready?

00:55:49.220 White board

00:55:49.760 time.

00:55:54.180 Well, I'm

00:55:55.120 old enough to

00:55:55.700 remember, as

00:55:58.020 many of you

00:55:58.580 are as well.

00:56:00.480 Let me give

00:56:01.060 you a clearer

00:56:01.740 look here.

00:56:04.460 If you're

00:56:06.820 talking about

00:56:07.660 discrimination,

00:56:09.720 the biggest

00:56:11.420 topic of

00:56:11.980 discrimination was

00:56:12.840 usually white

00:56:13.780 versus black. 0.50

00:56:15.420 So there was

00:56:15.900 a time when it

00:56:16.460 was just a

00:56:17.120 white versus 0.67

00:56:17.740 black conversation.

00:56:19.360 But as you

00:56:19.880 know, that was

00:56:20.940 not good enough,

00:56:22.020 and that

00:56:22.580 eventually evolved

00:56:23.500 into something

00:56:24.160 called

00:56:24.500 intersectionality.

00:56:26.120 Now, if you're

00:56:26.760 not aware of

00:56:27.240 this term,

00:56:28.620 intersectionality

00:56:30.580 means that you

00:56:31.400 might be

00:56:31.820 discriminated

00:56:33.440 against for

00:56:34.840 more than

00:56:35.300 one reason.

00:56:36.340 For example,

00:56:36.860 you could be

00:56:37.600 black, but 0.84

00:56:38.980 also a

00:56:39.560 lesbian.

00:56:40.680 So that's the

00:56:41.280 intersection.

00:56:41.780 And that's

00:56:43.280 important, because

00:56:44.600 the problems of

00:56:45.960 just being black

00:56:46.940 would be

00:56:47.380 different from

00:56:48.520 somebody who's

00:56:49.000 black and

00:56:50.440 LGBTQ.

00:56:51.860 But let's say

00:56:52.700 you could throw

00:56:53.100 disabled in there,

00:56:54.360 people who are

00:56:54.920 differently abled.

00:56:55.940 So you'd have a

00:56:56.540 number of

00:56:56.900 categories, and

00:56:57.560 you could be

00:56:58.020 more than one.

00:56:59.120 You could be

00:56:59.520 several things.

00:57:00.760 Now, why is

00:57:01.620 this better?

00:57:02.880 Why is it

00:57:03.660 better to look

00:57:04.240 at intersectionality

00:57:05.500 versus just to

00:57:07.300 see things as

00:57:08.000 race?

00:57:08.440 Well, I'll

00:57:09.780 tell you.

00:57:10.760 Your common

00:57:11.380 sense is very

00:57:14.120 clear on this,

00:57:15.440 which is that

00:57:16.640 it's not close

00:57:17.960 enough.

00:57:19.080 That the people

00:57:19.880 who have these

00:57:20.360 unique problems

00:57:21.420 have problems

00:57:22.800 that are pretty

00:57:23.300 unique, right?

00:57:24.880 If you're

00:57:26.740 Hispanic and

00:57:28.580 LGBTQ and

00:57:30.260 you've got a

00:57:31.360 disability,

00:57:32.920 your situation

00:57:34.560 isn't quite like

00:57:35.340 anybody else's.

00:57:36.120 Would you agree?

00:57:37.200 You have some

00:57:38.100 things in common,

00:57:39.500 but your

00:57:39.920 situation's

00:57:40.680 different.

00:57:41.940 So it makes

00:57:42.500 sense, I think

00:57:43.380 everybody would

00:57:43.920 agree, left and

00:57:45.480 right, it makes

00:57:46.580 more sense to get

00:57:47.540 down to some

00:57:48.160 granularity.

00:57:50.880 So suppose we

00:57:51.660 wanted to improve

00:57:53.480 on this yet

00:57:54.100 again, right?

00:57:56.260 So just looking

00:57:57.660 at black and

00:57:58.200 white, it was

00:57:59.040 too big a

00:57:59.820 category, you

00:58:00.700 can't do enough

00:58:01.240 with it.

00:58:01.960 Go to a little

00:58:02.540 more granularity.

00:58:03.800 Well, you might

00:58:04.820 be black and

00:58:05.920 also this, or

00:58:07.560 this and also

00:58:08.260 that, that's

00:58:09.000 better, wouldn't

00:58:09.460 you say?

00:58:10.440 More granularity.

00:58:12.420 Yeah.

00:58:12.780 If you're going

00:58:13.240 to fix a

00:58:13.740 problem, you

00:58:14.160 want to

00:58:14.420 understand it

00:58:15.260 as well as

00:58:16.320 you can

00:58:16.580 understand it,

00:58:17.460 and this

00:58:17.940 moves you

00:58:18.500 closer to

00:58:19.060 understand it.

00:58:20.580 So what

00:58:21.260 would be the

00:58:21.720 next logical

00:58:23.200 place that this

00:58:24.260 should go if

00:58:25.860 we continue to

00:58:26.760 be rational?

00:58:27.320 people, or

00:58:39.700 actually

00:58:40.020 person, because

00:58:42.260 it's

00:58:42.440 individuals.

00:58:44.200 Individuals.

00:58:44.960 Now, if

00:58:54.060 you understood

00:58:54.820 discrimination and

00:58:57.000 everything else in

00:58:57.800 terms of

00:58:58.200 individuals, which

00:59:00.780 is really where

00:59:01.340 this was getting

00:59:01.980 to, it was

00:59:02.820 getting closer to

00:59:03.560 the individual, but

00:59:04.780 if we go all the

00:59:05.500 way, now we can

00:59:06.540 really do something.

00:59:07.800 Because if this is

00:59:09.060 the problem, white 0.99

00:59:10.540 versus black, what

00:59:12.760 are you going to do

00:59:13.240 about it?

00:59:14.640 What's your plan

00:59:15.440 to make that

00:59:15.920 better?

00:59:16.500 Well, there's

00:59:16.980 some things you

00:59:17.480 can do, improving

00:59:18.760 education, etc., but

00:59:20.060 it doesn't seem to

00:59:20.940 be working.

00:59:22.360 So then getting to

00:59:23.440 more granular, well,

00:59:24.960 maybe we can do

00:59:25.580 something if we

00:59:26.180 understand it at

00:59:26.980 this level, but

00:59:28.340 how about going

00:59:29.100 further?

00:59:30.080 How about going

00:59:30.620 all the way to

00:59:31.160 the individual?

00:59:32.780 Because each of

00:59:33.460 these individuals has

00:59:34.380 unique problems, and

00:59:35.580 it's not just their

00:59:37.160 color and their

00:59:37.960 sexual preference or

00:59:39.280 anything like that.

00:59:40.320 They're just

00:59:40.800 different people.

00:59:43.240 So how about

00:59:43.920 creating a strategy

00:59:45.140 that is the right

00:59:46.720 strategy for each

00:59:47.860 person, which takes

00:59:49.600 into account far

00:59:50.700 more than the

00:59:52.000 discrimination.

00:59:53.300 It takes into

00:59:54.180 account where they

00:59:54.880 live, how old

00:59:56.440 they are, what's

00:59:57.820 their parent

00:59:58.220 situation, is there

00:59:59.440 a good school in

01:00:00.200 your town, what's

01:00:02.020 your personality,

01:00:04.040 what's your

01:00:04.480 character, what

01:00:05.660 things do you need

01:00:06.680 that you don't

01:00:07.440 have.

01:00:08.260 These are all

01:00:09.000 solvable problems.

01:00:10.940 If you give me an

01:00:11.780 individual, they

01:00:13.380 might not take my

01:00:14.180 advice, but I

01:00:15.380 can certainly tell

01:00:16.040 them what to do.

01:00:17.640 I don't know how

01:00:18.240 to solve these

01:00:19.060 other things.

01:00:20.360 I don't know what

01:00:20.940 I could do as an

01:00:21.660 individual, but if a

01:00:23.220 person is in front

01:00:25.680 of me and they're

01:00:26.820 not succeeding in

01:00:28.320 life and they want

01:00:29.000 to know how, I

01:00:30.180 could totally help

01:00:30.800 that person.

01:00:33.420 So I would say

01:00:34.280 that the left and

01:00:35.480 the right were

01:00:36.440 accidentally heading

01:00:37.460 in the same

01:00:37.920 direction, which is

01:00:39.660 the framing of white

01:00:40.960 versus black, wasn't 0.59

01:00:42.120 getting you enough,

01:00:42.980 what do you do

01:00:43.540 about it?

01:00:45.100 The instinct to go

01:00:46.300 to the next level

01:00:47.080 of detail was the

01:00:48.060 right instinct.

01:00:49.080 It's the right

01:00:49.640 instinct.

01:00:50.380 It just doesn't go

01:00:51.240 far enough.

01:00:52.360 You've got to go

01:00:52.780 all the way to what

01:00:53.760 makes every person

01:00:54.580 unique, and then you

01:00:55.860 can solve their

01:00:56.400 problem.

01:00:57.700 Now, here's the

01:01:00.240 persuasion frame on

01:01:01.480 this.

01:01:03.520 Do you notice that

01:01:05.060 there's a whole lot

01:01:05.860 of making you think

01:01:07.820 past the sail in

01:01:08.800 this, especially

01:01:10.500 the white-black 0.67

01:01:11.980 model, but also

01:01:13.640 the intersectionality

01:01:14.620 model.

01:01:15.080 They both have the

01:01:15.900 same characteristic.

01:01:17.560 The characteristic

01:01:18.220 is they ask you

01:01:21.360 to accept that

01:01:22.920 this was the right

01:01:23.700 way to look at it

01:01:24.440 in the first place.

01:01:26.280 If they're making

01:01:27.240 you talk about

01:01:28.220 the difference

01:01:30.860 between black and

01:01:31.840 white performance

01:01:32.760 or outcomes,

01:01:34.480 then they've

01:01:35.260 already made you

01:01:35.880 think past the

01:01:36.600 sail that this was

01:01:38.220 ever the right

01:01:38.780 question in the

01:01:39.480 first place.

01:01:41.360 You see that?

01:01:42.980 So every time

01:01:44.020 somebody gets you

01:01:44.760 into a conversation

01:01:45.680 of outcomes or

01:01:47.700 differences in the

01:01:48.740 average white or

01:01:49.640 average black,

01:01:50.580 they're talking about

01:01:51.400 somebody who doesn't

01:01:52.340 exist.

01:01:53.660 There's no average

01:01:54.420 white person.

01:01:55.820 There's no average

01:01:56.540 black person.

01:01:57.800 There's no average

01:01:58.440 person.

01:01:59.660 We're not just

01:02:00.800 different on race,

01:02:02.420 and we're not just

01:02:03.620 different because we

01:02:04.520 all have some

01:02:05.140 different intersectionality

01:02:06.580 thing going on.

01:02:07.380 We are infinitely

01:02:09.180 different.

01:02:10.820 We are infinitely

01:02:11.700 different.

01:02:13.140 So if you accept

01:02:14.200 any of these frames,

01:02:15.940 you're accepting

01:02:16.740 an absurdity that

01:02:18.680 looking at the

01:02:19.260 average of white

01:02:20.000 people and the

01:02:20.600 average of black

01:02:21.160 people tells you

01:02:22.440 something you could

01:02:23.360 or should do

01:02:24.000 something about.

01:02:25.640 Do you know what I

01:02:26.620 care about the

01:02:27.260 average difference

01:02:28.040 between any two

01:02:29.060 groups?

01:02:30.320 Nothing.

01:02:31.300 I don't care.

01:02:32.140 I have zero

01:02:33.680 interest in fixing

01:02:35.340 this average.

01:02:37.800 Now, that makes me

01:02:38.480 sound like a

01:02:38.980 terrible person,

01:02:39.740 doesn't it?

01:02:40.580 But the reason I

01:02:41.320 have zero interest

01:02:42.060 in this is that

01:02:42.760 it's a trick, and

01:02:44.040 it gives you no

01:02:44.760 solution.

01:02:46.160 It only gives you

01:02:47.160 victimhood and

01:02:48.380 transfer of money.

01:02:50.300 It doesn't give you

01:02:51.160 a system to fix it.

01:02:53.580 So you have a goal.

01:02:56.000 It's a goal.

01:02:57.120 We'd like different

01:02:58.380 groups to have

01:02:59.860 similar outcomes.

01:03:00.560 That's a good

01:03:01.060 goal.

01:03:01.920 But what's the

01:03:02.640 system?

01:03:04.060 The system you

01:03:05.000 don't really have.

01:03:06.940 Let's say you go to

01:03:07.860 the next level, and

01:03:09.160 you complicate it, or

01:03:10.240 go down to more

01:03:10.880 granularity.

01:03:12.300 It's moving in the

01:03:13.180 right direction, I

01:03:13.880 think, but it still

01:03:15.220 doesn't give you a

01:03:15.940 system.

01:03:16.760 What are you going

01:03:17.180 to do about it?

01:03:18.420 All right?

01:03:18.680 So you do have an

01:03:21.220 Elbonian disabled

01:03:22.980 bisexual.

01:03:25.700 So?

01:03:27.900 And they have

01:03:28.620 different outcomes

01:03:29.500 outcomes than the

01:03:30.780 Asian-American, I

01:03:35.220 don't know, non-

01:03:38.600 binaries or

01:03:39.200 something.

01:03:40.720 So?

01:03:41.920 What are you going

01:03:42.640 to do with that?

01:03:44.000 That makes sense.

01:03:45.100 That isn't

01:03:45.520 discriminatory.

01:03:46.680 But let's say you

01:03:47.480 take it to the next

01:03:48.240 level of individuals.

01:03:51.380 So, all right, so

01:03:52.540 individuals have

01:03:53.420 different outcomes.

01:03:54.100 So, Scott, you know,

01:03:56.400 you keep complaining

01:03:57.120 about systems.

01:03:58.680 What's your system

01:04:00.000 just because you

01:04:01.700 divided it this way?

01:04:03.820 Well, my system is

01:04:06.820 sitting behind you.

01:04:13.820 Right there.

01:04:14.540 Now, these are two

01:04:17.400 books that I wrote, but

01:04:19.260 you wouldn't have to

01:04:19.860 buy my books.

01:04:21.440 These are both

01:04:22.300 teaching you how to

01:04:23.140 develop a system for

01:04:24.400 your own personal

01:04:25.100 success.

01:04:26.720 So, if you divide it

01:04:29.260 by individuals, you

01:04:32.060 don't just have a

01:04:33.500 goal, but you have a

01:04:35.320 system.

01:04:36.340 Oh, there are

01:04:38.260 self-

01:04:39.020 there are basically

01:04:40.540 skill development

01:04:42.280 books of all kinds.

01:04:44.560 There are probably

01:04:45.160 ten books that if

01:04:47.620 you read all ten,

01:04:49.440 your odds of

01:04:50.400 succeeding are close

01:04:51.360 to 100%, right?

01:04:53.380 Unless you get sick

01:04:54.240 or you have some

01:04:54.760 terrible bad luck.

01:04:55.920 But if you just did

01:04:56.820 the things that

01:04:57.920 people who are

01:04:59.660 successful advise you

01:05:00.980 to do, and it

01:05:01.980 might not be my

01:05:02.720 advice.

01:05:04.060 You know, I don't

01:05:04.680 call my stuff advice

01:05:05.720 for there's a reason

01:05:06.880 for that.

01:05:07.680 But you have

01:05:08.960 so many different

01:05:09.860 sources for how

01:05:11.380 to fix your

01:05:11.860 individual problem.

01:05:13.640 You also have an

01:05:15.000 infinite number of

01:05:16.440 mentors that would

01:05:18.920 be willing to

01:05:19.440 help.

01:05:20.680 What can a mentor

01:05:21.760 do if you're

01:05:22.600 looking at the

01:05:23.300 world as it's

01:05:24.260 black versus white?

01:05:26.020 What does a

01:05:26.500 mentor do?

01:05:28.220 It's hard to be a

01:05:29.220 mentor in that world,

01:05:30.400 and the same with

01:05:31.060 intersectionality.

01:05:32.300 But the moment you

01:05:33.140 say everybody's

01:05:33.980 infinitely different,

01:05:35.580 and my problem

01:05:36.340 isn't like your

01:05:37.220 problem just because

01:05:38.020 we're both

01:05:38.460 Elbonians, I have a

01:05:39.880 different problem

01:05:40.380 than you do.

01:05:41.460 As soon as you go

01:05:42.360 to that, then the

01:05:43.560 systems open up.

01:05:44.540 Oh, here's a system

01:05:46.280 for building skills.

01:05:47.780 Here's a system for

01:05:49.040 networking.

01:05:50.200 Here's a system for

01:05:51.240 improving your

01:05:52.100 education outcomes.

01:05:53.560 Here's a system for

01:05:54.640 studying.

01:05:55.440 Here's a system for

01:05:56.380 your fitness, because

01:05:57.720 that helps you in

01:05:58.600 every way.

01:05:59.240 Here's a fitness for

01:05:59.920 your diet.

01:06:01.240 Here's a fitness for

01:06:02.320 your appearance.

01:06:03.020 So, until you get

01:06:05.320 to the individual

01:06:06.040 level, there's no

01:06:07.880 system solution, and

01:06:10.500 this cries for a

01:06:11.760 system solution.

01:06:15.760 That, ladies and

01:06:16.900 gentlemen, is my

01:06:18.540 whiteboard for today.

01:06:20.360 And I would

01:06:24.880 further encourage

01:06:26.040 you, if you want

01:06:27.200 this kind of

01:06:30.140 frame to be the

01:06:31.420 dominant one, that

01:06:33.100 when somebody tries to

01:06:34.180 bait you into a 0.92

01:06:35.160 conversation about

01:06:36.320 the average difference

01:06:37.480 between black and

01:06:38.380 white performance,

01:06:40.100 tell them you're not

01:06:40.860 interested.

01:06:43.040 But tell them you are

01:06:44.200 very interested in the

01:06:45.860 success of any

01:06:46.780 individual, for which

01:06:48.620 you could probably

01:06:49.260 help with some

01:06:50.320 advice.

01:06:51.100 I mean, if the

01:06:51.740 only thing you did

01:06:52.380 is say, hey, you

01:06:53.940 need help succeeding?

01:06:55.380 Yes, I do.

01:06:56.460 Well, I'm not much

01:06:57.340 of a mentor, but I

01:06:58.760 could recommend five

01:07:00.140 books that would

01:07:01.320 really get you going.

01:07:03.580 So, every one of you

01:07:04.640 can be a mentor, just

01:07:06.100 because you know of a

01:07:06.920 book to recommend.

01:07:08.480 Probably more than

01:07:09.240 one.

01:07:11.120 So, do not buy into

01:07:12.660 the frame of what the

01:07:13.980 average, non-existent,

01:07:15.740 imaginary person is

01:07:16.800 doing, compared to the

01:07:18.440 average, non-existent

01:07:20.040 other person is

01:07:21.420 doing.

01:07:23.700 Just don't buy in.

01:07:25.340 Don't let them make

01:07:26.080 you think past the

01:07:26.820 sale.

01:07:28.340 Individuals are the 0.96

01:07:29.060 only frame that's

01:07:30.320 worth talking about.

01:07:31.320 Everything else is

01:07:32.360 political manipulation.

01:07:37.140 Yeah, we'll probably

01:07:38.000 clip this.

01:07:38.560 All right.

01:07:41.520 And that, ladies and

01:07:42.980 gentlemen, is my

01:07:44.900 blockbuster live stream

01:07:47.120 for today.

01:07:48.600 Yeah, we'll clip that

01:07:49.960 part out and make

01:07:52.000 that available.

01:08:01.440 Marxists say thinking

01:08:02.500 about the individual is

01:08:03.580 bad.

01:08:04.700 Who cares?

01:08:06.240 And by the way, here's

01:08:07.240 a little tip on making

01:08:10.040 people go away or try

01:08:11.900 to sell you stuff.

01:08:12.600 If somebody's trying to

01:08:14.320 sell you something, let's

01:08:15.500 say a telemarketer, and

01:08:17.360 you want to tell them to

01:08:18.720 go away, but you want to

01:08:19.620 do it in the best possible

01:08:20.660 and most effective way, the

01:08:22.820 phrase not interested is

01:08:25.420 devastating.

01:08:27.760 So, if somebody's trying to

01:08:28.960 sell you something and you

01:08:30.040 go, oh, you know, I'm not

01:08:32.980 looking to buy today, they'll

01:08:35.440 still keep at you.

01:08:36.900 If you say, oh, you know, I

01:08:39.200 can't afford it, they'll tell

01:08:41.060 you that you can make

01:08:42.060 payments over time.

01:08:43.820 So, anything you say that's

01:08:45.480 like a regular objection,

01:08:47.940 then a salesperson has a

01:08:49.580 counter to it.

01:08:50.680 The one thing that they

01:08:51.860 can't counter is a lack of

01:08:53.600 interest, and they will give

01:08:55.360 up right away.

01:08:57.340 A lack of interest is the end

01:08:59.860 of the fucking conversation. 0.92

01:09:02.180 And sometimes you have to say

01:09:03.460 it three times, but by the

01:09:05.520 third time you say it, it's

01:09:07.200 over.

01:09:07.480 Yeah, but would you like

01:09:09.920 to, yeah, no, I'm not

01:09:11.040 interested.

01:09:12.040 Well, but did you know, yeah,

01:09:13.160 I'm not interested.

01:09:14.360 I mean, yeah, I'm not

01:09:15.680 interested.

01:09:16.800 Okay, thank you.

01:09:18.580 Three times an hour.

01:09:19.720 Works every time.

01:09:20.860 I've never, I've never seen

01:09:21.860 it fail.

01:09:22.720 And it works when somebody's

01:09:23.960 standing in front of you at

01:09:24.940 your door.

01:09:25.900 You ever accidentally open the

01:09:27.660 door and it was a salesperson

01:09:28.960 and you can't make them go

01:09:30.920 away?

01:09:31.600 Just look them right in the

01:09:32.660 eye and go, yeah, yeah, I'm

01:09:33.780 not interested.

01:09:34.320 It's not impolite.

01:09:37.920 You have no obligation to be

01:09:39.460 interested in what other

01:09:40.760 people want you to be

01:09:41.600 interested in.

01:09:42.360 None.

01:09:43.420 You have no obligation for

01:09:44.740 that.

01:09:45.540 Just look them in the eye and

01:09:46.540 say, yeah, I'm not

01:09:47.200 interested.

01:09:48.960 It'll go away right away.

01:09:50.820 So when somebody brings you

01:09:51.980 the average person in this

01:09:55.060 group, didn't do as good as

01:09:56.780 the average person in this

01:09:57.720 group, so we have to, just

01:09:58.920 say, I'm not really

01:09:59.500 interested in that

01:10:00.060 conversation.

01:10:01.700 Yeah, those are people that

01:10:03.000 don't exist.

01:10:03.740 I'm not interested in

01:10:04.760 non-existent people and

01:10:06.560 solutions that can't work.

01:10:10.280 All right, that's all for

01:10:11.320 now, YouTube.

01:10:12.560 Thanks for joining.

01:10:14.420 I'll see you tomorrow for

01:10:16.540 more excitement.

01:10:17.120 Thank you.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - September 24, 2023

Episode 2241 Scott Adams： Lots Of Fake News And Fake Science Today (Probably All Of It) Bring Coffee

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript