Real Coffee with Scott Adams - September 29, 2023


Episode 2246 Scott Adams： News & Science & Other Things You Shouldn't Believe. Bring Lots Of Coffee


Episode Stats

Length

53 minutes

Words per Minute

141.76135

Word Count

7,602

Sentence Count

597

Misogynist Sentences

8

Hate Speech Sentences

17


Summary

Scott Adams talks about how to make a good recipe from a photograph, nuclear power in Poland, and why he doesn t think ChatPGP can make good recipes from a photo. Plus, a story about a woman who can make the best soup in the world.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.
00:00:08.380 It's Coffee with Scott Adams, and man, are you lucky to be here now.
00:00:13.380 All you need to take this experience up to galactic levels is a cup or a mug or a glass,
00:00:20.800 a tank or chalice or stye, and a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind,
00:00:24.900 fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.
00:00:27.520 So, join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine today that makes everything better,
00:00:33.800 except my sound, because I knew I was forgetting something.
00:00:40.080 Let's see. Hold on, hold on.
00:00:44.540 Yes, if I put my microphone on, this will all go better.
00:00:50.620 Now, a minute ago when I said I know I'm forgetting something,
00:00:54.060 you should have said, your microphone, your microphone.
00:00:57.520 But that's better, isn't it?
00:00:59.840 Well, you missed a simultaneous sip, but I think you read my lips and it came out about the same.
00:01:07.040 I should just turn off YouTube, because there's no way it's going to be monetized now.
00:01:14.280 I've got a feeling the first three seconds of you don't hear sound,
00:01:18.080 you just go to the next thing, right?
00:01:20.300 There's like no point in it.
00:01:21.600 Well, anyway, let's talk about the news.
00:01:26.220 I've got a clarification for you.
00:01:29.320 It goes like this.
00:01:30.840 Confidence is a feature, but certainty is a bug.
00:01:34.980 So, confidence is good, and certainty is bad.
00:01:39.340 Does that make sense?
00:01:42.860 Confidence means you'll be okay.
00:01:44.700 One way or another, you'll work it out, you'll figure it out.
00:01:47.160 That's confidence, but certainty is that you know exactly what's true.
00:01:52.020 You don't really know that.
00:01:53.980 You can just be confident that you'll figure it out.
00:01:57.920 All right, I just thought I'd mention that.
00:02:00.460 Brian Romelli reports that now ChatGPT, I guess it's version 5,
00:02:05.780 has a multimodal mode, meaning it can see and talk and hear and stuff.
00:02:12.880 And you can take a picture of a dish, a prepared food dish,
00:02:19.140 and it will tell you the recipe.
00:02:21.200 So you just take a picture of it, and it tells you the recipe.
00:02:23.900 Do you believe that works?
00:02:26.720 No.
00:02:29.460 Do you know what else can take a picture of something
00:02:31.720 and tell you the recipe?
00:02:33.040 Your mom, yeah, your mom can look at it,
00:02:37.960 and she can probably, well, it looks like you got some cheese in there,
00:02:41.340 it looks like some beans, I see a couple of lentils, and some corn.
00:02:45.860 Yeah, I can make that.
00:02:47.920 So, I do not believe that ChatGPT can make a good recipe from a photograph.
00:02:55.700 Nope, I do not believe it.
00:02:57.900 Let me tell you a little story.
00:02:59.200 When I owned a restaurant, I had a friend who made the best doll soup,
00:03:05.780 D-A-H-L, is it D-A-H-L or D-A-L?
00:03:09.160 I forget.
00:03:10.100 But, you know, an Indian dish.
00:03:13.080 And it was the best thing I've ever tasted in my life to this day.
00:03:19.160 I've never put anything of food nature in my mouth that tasted that good.
00:03:24.860 And so, I said, can you teach my chef how to make it?
00:03:29.820 So, she came over and taught my chef how to make it,
00:03:33.320 and then he made it, and it tasted terrible.
00:03:36.800 And we, you know, double-checked and triple-checked,
00:03:39.200 and all the ingredients were the same.
00:03:41.520 And do you know why it was so different?
00:03:42.980 Because the woman who made it always made it different every time,
00:03:47.680 and she tasted it as she went.
00:03:49.460 And so, there was not ever really a recipe.
00:03:52.860 It was just somebody who would taste things until it was right and then serve it.
00:03:57.580 That was about it.
00:03:59.000 So, no, this whole idea that you can copy a recipe doesn't work.
00:04:04.840 Also, when I owned a recipe, or I owned a restaurant,
00:04:07.500 I had a favorite dish, so I would tell them to make that dish.
00:04:13.440 Different every time.
00:04:15.240 No two people made it the same.
00:04:16.960 Sometimes it was terrible.
00:04:18.720 Actually, inedible.
00:04:20.440 And other times, the best thing I ever ate.
00:04:22.860 So, no, Chad GPT cannot tell you how to cook anything.
00:04:26.600 Not yet.
00:04:29.540 Poland is starting work on three nuclear reactors.
00:04:34.360 So, Poland is going wild on nuclear power.
00:04:38.980 Why are we not doing this in the United States?
00:04:42.560 Incompetence.
00:04:43.780 Yeah.
00:04:44.260 We presumably have regulations that stop us from doing this,
00:04:47.860 which probably are dated or under-informed.
00:04:51.800 So, we have an incompetence problem in the United States.
00:04:56.040 And if we'd like to be smarter, we should look to Poland.
00:05:01.220 Which is ruining a lot of old jokes.
00:05:03.260 But, I guess they were inappropriate in the first place.
00:05:07.760 So, Poland doing everything right, I'm told.
00:05:10.920 Good for you, Poland.
00:05:13.580 All right.
00:05:14.840 Did anybody see an interview, a recent one,
00:05:18.980 that just happened this week,
00:05:20.300 between Lex Friedman and Mark Zuckerberg,
00:05:23.800 in which they do the interview within virtual reality?
00:05:27.820 Now, when I first say that, you say,
00:05:30.320 oh, blah, blah, blah, that's been done before.
00:05:33.320 No, not like this.
00:05:35.740 This is photorealistic.
00:05:38.680 So, the two heads were not their real heads,
00:05:43.180 but every little eye movement, you know,
00:05:46.060 mouth feature as they spoke,
00:05:48.480 all in real time, all synced up,
00:05:50.820 and all perfectly real.
00:05:52.140 And as they were talking to each other,
00:05:55.120 in the virtual world,
00:05:56.560 they could put their virtual heads pretty close together,
00:05:59.060 and it actually feels, like, awkward,
00:06:01.940 because you're too close to another person.
00:06:04.160 So, you actually feel like it's the real person
00:06:06.640 when you're in that mode.
00:06:08.420 Now, the current limitation
00:06:10.160 is that they don't have a cheap, easy way
00:06:14.080 to scan your face.
00:06:16.620 Someday, you'll be able to, presumably,
00:06:18.220 someday you'll be able to hold up your camera
00:06:20.320 and, you know, scan yourself
00:06:21.880 and then create your model for this.
00:06:25.400 But at the moment, I guess it takes hours
00:06:27.080 and special equipment.
00:06:29.340 But, here's the big change.
00:06:34.260 They don't need to send over the Internet
00:06:36.680 the entire video of what you're trying to look like.
00:06:41.580 Instead, they create it once,
00:06:43.900 and then the only thing that they send over the Internet
00:06:45.860 is the changes.
00:06:48.220 Like a numerical representation of the change.
00:06:51.400 So that you can use low bandwidth,
00:06:54.860 relatively low bandwidth,
00:06:56.560 and have a complete photorealistic experience
00:06:59.440 as long as you've scanned both sides.
00:07:03.440 Now, that's pretty awesome.
00:07:06.520 And apparently, it's so intimate
00:07:08.540 that you can imagine, you know,
00:07:12.220 nearly a sexual experience because of it.
00:07:15.040 Probably you could.
00:07:15.760 But, you know, yeah, I don't want to get too detailed,
00:07:18.360 but I'm sure there's a way that
00:07:19.760 you could turn it into almost a full sexual experience.
00:07:24.900 Now, imagine if you wanted to...
00:07:28.640 All right, let me make a prediction.
00:07:30.120 There will be digital prostitution.
00:07:35.500 And by that, I mean people who are maybe not attractive,
00:07:39.460 but they create an avatar, which is.
00:07:42.000 And it's photorealistic.
00:07:43.800 And then maybe the person on the other side
00:07:45.900 has some physical component, sex toy,
00:07:49.140 that they can be using at the same time
00:07:51.180 that they think they're with this person.
00:07:52.940 It's going to be pretty intense.
00:07:56.720 So, you know, goodbye reproduction.
00:08:00.900 So it's going to be better than regular sex, I think.
00:08:04.280 The real test will be if it can activate your oxytocin.
00:08:08.760 So, you know, your oxytocin is the chemical
00:08:11.140 that your body produces when you're hugging people
00:08:14.100 and having intimate contact.
00:08:16.960 As far as I know, it's the only way you can get it.
00:08:19.420 There's nothing else you can do.
00:08:21.680 It's a human-to-human...
00:08:23.960 Maybe your pet can do it a little bit,
00:08:25.680 but it's basically a human-to-human situation.
00:08:29.360 But could this technology be so similar to a human?
00:08:35.340 And it probably is.
00:08:36.540 If you don't want to be close to the other person's face
00:08:38.700 because it feels creepy,
00:08:40.320 probably you're releasing some of those hormones.
00:08:45.280 So maybe it's an oxytocin source.
00:08:47.300 Who knows?
00:08:47.740 All right, I've got a way to tell who's going to be successful.
00:08:54.420 Do you ever look at a young person and say to yourself,
00:08:56.880 is that person going to be successful?
00:08:59.500 Now, if you assume, you know, some minimum level of capability,
00:09:04.060 then the next question is,
00:09:06.020 are they going to use that capability to do anything useful,
00:09:08.800 be successful?
00:09:10.280 Here's the best predictor that I've seen.
00:09:14.040 It's interest in figuring out the mechanism of success.
00:09:20.360 So it's not just, oh, I'll work hard,
00:09:22.680 or I want it really hard, or I have passion or something.
00:09:25.560 But does somebody actually go out of the way to study
00:09:28.420 the actual mechanism, the systems?
00:09:31.820 You know, what do you do?
00:09:32.680 What do successful people do?
00:09:36.280 You know, how do you get from here to there?
00:09:38.060 What's the process?
00:09:39.420 And you can see that right away with little kids.
00:09:43.140 When I was 12 years old,
00:09:45.360 I was already, you know, gobbling up news stories about famous people.
00:09:50.360 Any kind of story about a millionaire,
00:09:53.660 I'd read the whole thing.
00:09:55.000 It's like, oh, how did you get there?
00:09:56.080 Especially if the story was they came from nothing and they made money,
00:09:59.840 I'd read all of that.
00:10:01.680 And then I would also read, you know, books and stuff,
00:10:04.260 as I got a little older,
00:10:05.680 about anybody who would come up with some method for beating the system.
00:10:10.720 And I see that also with my book, Reframe Your Brain.
00:10:16.980 Because Reframe Your Brain is one of those change-your-life kinds of books.
00:10:21.260 And here's what I say about it,
00:10:22.880 and then you tell me if this would tell you who is successful.
00:10:26.860 Imagine you said this to somebody.
00:10:29.260 You said, oh, I've got this book.
00:10:30.840 It's called Reframe Your Brain.
00:10:32.720 And I tweeted this.
00:10:34.340 Many people say this book adds the highest value to your life
00:10:37.480 for the least effort in reading.
00:10:40.760 So it's the least amount of reading,
00:10:42.840 meaning it's a real easy read,
00:10:44.720 for the biggest impact.
00:10:47.100 Now, if somebody told you that,
00:10:49.260 wouldn't you at least want to skim through that book?
00:10:52.880 Now, if you don't,
00:10:54.460 and that doesn't interest you at all,
00:10:56.860 you're probably not somebody who's going to really kill it in life.
00:11:00.260 If somebody hands you something that's like,
00:11:02.160 all right, if you spend like a minute looking at this,
00:11:04.560 your whole life will be better.
00:11:05.900 And if they say no,
00:11:07.520 you can pretty much predict how their life is going to be.
00:11:12.300 Now, they don't have to take it and read it while you're watching.
00:11:14.760 But if they don't at least show a little interest
00:11:18.000 in something that would be a small amount of work for a huge gain,
00:11:23.480 they're probably not going anywhere.
00:11:25.840 So that's a good way to spot successful people.
00:11:30.100 And by the way, the feedback for that book is insane.
00:11:33.840 The number of people.
00:11:35.000 People are saying it saved their lives,
00:11:37.700 like literally,
00:11:39.000 and changed their lives and all kinds of stuff.
00:11:43.120 It's amazing.
00:11:45.040 So Senator Dianne Feinstein has died at the age of 90.
00:11:51.360 And, boy, this is a tough one.
00:11:55.060 It's a tough one.
00:11:56.440 Because we all want to show respect to the family
00:11:59.640 and for the person passing.
00:12:01.360 But it does make you wonder where the line is.
00:12:05.500 Where's the line?
00:12:07.480 What kind of behavior would be so bad
00:12:10.280 that you would not show respect to somebody after they died?
00:12:14.820 I don't know.
00:12:15.320 It's kind of subjective.
00:12:17.100 But people are going to be all over the line on this one.
00:12:21.260 So the real question is,
00:12:22.700 is there any way to make Adam Schiff's eyes
00:12:25.720 bug out more than they were already?
00:12:27.900 And the answer is, yes,
00:12:29.760 the passing of Senator Dianne Feinstein.
00:12:32.240 Because Adam Schiff might be the replacement.
00:12:36.780 Could be.
00:12:37.380 You never know.
00:12:39.880 Or possibly Joe Biden will choose Dianne Feinstein's corpse
00:12:44.360 as his new VP as an upgrade.
00:12:47.140 Possibly.
00:12:48.160 Anything could happen.
00:12:49.920 Damn it.
00:12:50.380 I couldn't be respectful.
00:12:51.560 I couldn't go a minute.
00:12:53.500 Well, I don't think she respected me either,
00:12:55.400 or so, I think we're even.
00:12:57.180 All right.
00:12:59.000 So the leading causes of death
00:13:01.120 for people between the age of 18 and 44
00:13:03.600 used to be automobiles.
00:13:07.180 Yeah.
00:13:07.420 Used to kill the most people between 18 and 44.
00:13:10.000 And now it's suicide and fentanyl,
00:13:14.140 which are very related.
00:13:16.520 Fentanyl and suicide.
00:13:19.620 Yep.
00:13:19.880 So, if El Chapo died,
00:13:26.380 would I have any respect for him?
00:13:28.420 Would I say, whoa, that's El Chapo.
00:13:31.500 He was sending a lot of fentanyl into the United States.
00:13:35.340 But, you know, he's dead now.
00:13:39.180 So I respect him.
00:13:40.640 And I don't want to offend the family.
00:13:42.600 So let's show some respect for El Chapo when he passes.
00:13:45.880 Does that sound right?
00:13:46.720 Not really.
00:13:49.080 No, because you think he was responsible
00:13:50.800 for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans
00:13:54.180 through fentanyl.
00:13:56.280 But suppose you had a politician
00:13:58.040 who was also responsible.
00:14:00.520 In other words,
00:14:01.020 somebody whose job it was to control the border,
00:14:04.020 or at least be one of them,
00:14:05.420 but wasn't doing it
00:14:06.500 and left the border open.
00:14:10.060 Should I feel different about somebody
00:14:11.720 who allowed El Chapo to do it
00:14:13.760 versus how I feel about El Chapo himself?
00:14:16.720 I'll leave that an open question.
00:14:21.640 Well, who's suing Musk today?
00:14:24.320 As you know,
00:14:25.240 the government is weaponizing itself against Elon Musk
00:14:28.380 because he likes free speech.
00:14:31.060 I mean, literally, that's the reason.
00:14:33.260 And now the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
00:14:36.860 is suing Tesla
00:14:38.520 because they're accusing him
00:14:40.460 of violating federal law by tolerating.
00:14:42.500 So they didn't do something that he tolerated, allegedly.
00:14:47.220 Widespread and ongoing racial harassment
00:14:49.100 of its black employees
00:14:50.620 and subjecting some of them for retaliation
00:14:55.440 for opposing the harassment.
00:14:57.740 Now, do you suppose that Elon Musk
00:15:02.200 was aware of this and tolerated it?
00:15:04.800 No.
00:15:06.560 No, of course he didn't.
00:15:08.340 He may have been aware of it,
00:15:09.760 but I'm sure he wasn't tolerating it.
00:15:11.480 I don't know what you can do about it exactly all the time.
00:15:14.540 But,
00:15:14.800 so that's the thing.
00:15:17.060 But this is reported by NBC,
00:15:19.360 and I noted the other day
00:15:20.320 that NBC is how the NPCs get programmed.
00:15:24.240 Is that a coincidence
00:15:25.120 that NBC and NPC sound the same?
00:15:29.420 Oh, I saw it on MSNPC.
00:15:32.560 So I think I'm going to call them MSNPC
00:15:34.880 because they're the ones who program the NPCs.
00:15:37.880 Am I wrong?
00:15:39.380 They literally program the NPCs.
00:15:43.240 The people who can't think for themselves.
00:15:45.120 So MSNPC,
00:15:49.480 try it out.
00:15:50.240 You'll like it.
00:15:52.460 All right.
00:15:55.860 So,
00:15:56.800 what do you do if you're an employer,
00:15:59.380 and if you don't hire diversity,
00:16:03.420 you'll get in trouble,
00:16:04.500 but if you do hire diversity,
00:16:06.200 there's a very high likelihood of getting sued
00:16:08.520 once you've hired them.
00:16:10.900 It's kind of a no-win situation, isn't it?
00:16:13.140 And I'm not saying that there wasn't racial harassment.
00:16:18.420 I'm not dismissing the charge.
00:16:21.460 If this was happening, it's pretty bad.
00:16:24.180 It should be stopped.
00:16:26.000 But it's a challenge in risk management
00:16:30.520 because you're going to lose either way, really.
00:16:34.540 All right.
00:16:35.020 In other news,
00:16:36.540 researchers at Columbia University
00:16:38.960 and University of Connecticut,
00:16:42.300 there came up a way to make this material
00:16:44.800 that's part glass and part DNA.
00:16:49.380 Part glass and part DNA.
00:16:53.360 And you put them together
00:16:54.840 and you get this super light
00:16:56.360 and super strong material.
00:16:59.520 Huh.
00:17:00.240 What could go wrong
00:17:01.520 if you match glass with DNA?
00:17:04.300 I feel like we're going to create
00:17:06.280 a species of glass people.
00:17:10.000 They'll be made of glass,
00:17:11.440 but super, super dense,
00:17:13.040 what with the DNA.
00:17:14.400 And pretty soon,
00:17:15.260 they'll be advocating for equal rights.
00:17:18.880 So glass people coming.
00:17:21.600 Here's another story about reframing pain.
00:17:24.980 So there's a study in JAMA,
00:17:27.560 J-A-M-A,
00:17:29.040 network open,
00:17:30.460 that says that a study said
00:17:33.560 that if you tell people
00:17:35.060 that their pain is in their brain,
00:17:37.840 they don't feel so much
00:17:38.980 as if you tell them
00:17:39.700 that it's in their body.
00:17:41.300 That's the short version.
00:17:43.000 If you tell people
00:17:43.780 to reframe their brain,
00:17:45.620 to reframe their pain
00:17:48.220 so that they just think
00:17:51.100 it's a mental experience,
00:17:53.680 then the pain goes away.
00:17:56.860 Now, I actually have that reframe
00:17:58.540 in my book.
00:18:00.460 You wouldn't recognize it,
00:18:01.560 but it's the one about cold.
00:18:03.860 And I tell a story
00:18:04.880 about meeting somebody
00:18:05.700 who reframed the experience
00:18:07.800 of being cold.
00:18:09.460 He was outdoors without a coat.
00:18:11.780 And he said that he had learned,
00:18:13.640 I won't say why,
00:18:15.000 but he had learned to reframe it
00:18:16.460 as just a feeling and not a pain.
00:18:19.680 Because it wasn't really going to kill him.
00:18:21.680 It was like, I don't know,
00:18:22.800 45 degrees or something.
00:18:24.560 He wasn't wearing a coat.
00:18:26.040 So he wasn't going to die.
00:18:27.400 He was just doing a thing
00:18:28.660 and most people
00:18:29.760 would have been super cold.
00:18:31.580 But I said to myself,
00:18:33.000 is that possible?
00:18:34.260 And I'll just tell you
00:18:35.200 what I wrote in the book here
00:18:36.080 for a moment.
00:18:36.900 I said, is it possible
00:18:37.800 that you could just tell your brain
00:18:39.360 that the cold doesn't hurt you anymore?
00:18:42.920 So I thought I'd try it.
00:18:44.860 And the way I did it was
00:18:46.240 I reframed the cold this way.
00:18:49.160 If it's true that getting
00:18:51.340 into a cold plunge
00:18:52.980 is good for you,
00:18:53.960 and I think basically
00:18:55.000 every expert says yes,
00:18:56.620 the cold plunge.
00:18:58.040 And it's also true
00:18:59.100 that the cryo things
00:19:00.460 where it's like super, super cold
00:19:02.200 is also good for you.
00:19:05.340 Then I tell myself,
00:19:06.900 well, wouldn't it also be
00:19:08.240 at least a little bit good for me
00:19:09.860 simply to be cold?
00:19:12.180 You know, not in a cold plunge,
00:19:13.800 but just to be cold.
00:19:15.300 Wouldn't that also be good for me?
00:19:17.040 And it probably is
00:19:18.800 in some lesser way.
00:19:21.020 But I decided to try it
00:19:22.980 when I was taking my garbage out
00:19:24.200 one day because it was cold
00:19:25.340 and I didn't want to walk back
00:19:26.480 and get a coat.
00:19:27.900 I thought, well,
00:19:28.320 what if I just try this?
00:19:29.880 I'll just say that the feeling
00:19:32.240 that I get from the cold
00:19:33.440 is not pain.
00:19:35.720 It's just a feeling.
00:19:37.660 And it's making me healthier.
00:19:39.800 And I walked out
00:19:40.900 and I took my garbage
00:19:42.880 all the way down,
00:19:43.640 which takes a while.
00:19:44.940 And I didn't feel any pain.
00:19:47.040 I just felt a sensation.
00:19:49.040 And since then,
00:19:49.940 I've done this same trick
00:19:51.260 a number of times.
00:19:53.200 And I'm not sure
00:19:54.700 it would work
00:19:55.120 for the really long term.
00:19:56.940 But for short-term situations
00:19:58.820 where you're just freezing
00:19:59.880 and you've just got to tough it out,
00:20:02.420 I just made it go away.
00:20:04.200 And I couldn't have imagined
00:20:05.740 that was possible,
00:20:06.940 even though I've seen it done
00:20:09.400 with hypnosis.
00:20:11.080 Now, if you're going to ask me
00:20:13.760 how can I reframe my pain away,
00:20:15.820 I don't have an answer for you.
00:20:18.300 Just reframe it like I did.
00:20:20.700 Just say it's in your mind.
00:20:22.800 Just say it's just a sensation.
00:20:25.020 But if that doesn't work,
00:20:26.600 there's not much else to do.
00:20:28.460 It's pretty much
00:20:29.240 it's that or nothing.
00:20:30.720 So give it a try.
00:20:31.940 If there's some time
00:20:32.880 where the pain
00:20:33.680 is not telling you
00:20:34.800 to fix something,
00:20:36.100 which is the purpose of pain,
00:20:38.160 you want to pay attention
00:20:39.420 to your pain
00:20:39.940 if it's telling you
00:20:40.560 to fix something
00:20:41.240 or run away from something.
00:20:42.860 But if it's just going to be there
00:20:44.500 no matter what,
00:20:46.080 you might be able
00:20:46.660 to reframe it.
00:20:48.920 Reframe your brain
00:20:49.780 and just tell yourself
00:20:50.740 it's not pain.
00:20:53.000 It's an artifact of your brain.
00:20:58.240 All right.
00:20:58.840 Well, and this is another way
00:21:00.600 that I think hypnosis
00:21:01.460 is 50 years ahead of science.
00:21:03.960 And you're seeing that a lot lately.
00:21:06.380 Science is just catching up
00:21:08.240 to where hypnosis was
00:21:09.580 50 years ago.
00:21:10.760 That's true, by the way.
00:21:14.020 I guess Matt Gaetz
00:21:15.600 and his friends in Congress
00:21:19.140 were successful
00:21:20.420 in getting the Ukraine funding.
00:21:23.620 At least it's reframed.
00:21:25.060 He said last night's vote
00:21:26.700 marks a major moment
00:21:28.200 in changing the perceptions
00:21:29.480 on how House Republicans
00:21:31.880 view Ukraine.
00:21:33.680 So I guess 101 Republicans
00:21:35.180 voted to send more money
00:21:36.440 to Ukraine.
00:21:37.700 But more than that,
00:21:38.780 117 Republicans voted against.
00:21:42.100 And now he says,
00:21:42.880 Ukraine funding has now lost
00:21:44.200 something called
00:21:44.960 the majority of the majority rule,
00:21:46.780 some kind of rule.
00:21:47.980 And because of the rules,
00:21:49.340 it cannot be brought up again
00:21:50.600 on the floor
00:21:51.220 per the conference rules.
00:21:54.760 So it looks like
00:21:55.800 Matt Gaetz actually
00:21:56.800 made some progress.
00:21:57.720 And it looks like
00:21:58.520 the House actually came through
00:22:00.940 with separate bills.
00:22:02.720 Now that doesn't mean
00:22:03.660 that they're passed.
00:22:04.400 I guess it goes to the House
00:22:05.480 and we'll see what,
00:22:06.440 or it goes to the Senate.
00:22:07.420 We'll see what the Senate does.
00:22:09.220 But this is one of the,
00:22:12.920 I might be wrong,
00:22:14.940 but this might be one of the
00:22:16.860 most positive things
00:22:18.680 that's happened to the country
00:22:20.200 ever.
00:22:23.740 Like, I don't know
00:22:24.600 if this is real yet.
00:22:26.260 You know, I don't know
00:22:26.880 if it's just going to be
00:22:27.520 this one time
00:22:28.360 they had to do
00:22:29.400 what they had to do.
00:22:30.080 But the fact that
00:22:31.760 they were successful
00:22:32.800 in getting this big
00:22:34.280 Frankenstein bill
00:22:35.380 turned into little,
00:22:37.340 smaller ones
00:22:38.160 that you can vote on
00:22:38.960 individually,
00:22:40.500 what if it happens again?
00:22:44.520 Yeah.
00:22:45.320 What if they do it again?
00:22:48.460 This could be gigantic.
00:22:49.900 If this became
00:22:50.840 the new thing that they do,
00:22:52.820 we might actually get
00:22:54.100 fiscal responsibility
00:22:55.660 for the first time.
00:22:56.700 And it was always obvious
00:22:59.040 what had to be done.
00:22:59.980 It was obvious
00:23:00.620 that this had to be done.
00:23:02.100 But now it is.
00:23:03.360 Maybe.
00:23:04.340 So if Matt Gaetz
00:23:05.280 pulled this off,
00:23:07.160 his argument
00:23:08.580 for being president
00:23:09.480 one day is getting
00:23:10.300 a lot stronger.
00:23:11.420 But we'll see
00:23:11.940 if this is permanent.
00:23:13.360 I would wait a little bit
00:23:14.840 on this story
00:23:15.460 to see if it's a trick.
00:23:17.600 Might be a trick.
00:23:19.440 Maybe the Senate
00:23:20.300 will just put them
00:23:20.960 all back together
00:23:21.640 and vote on them.
00:23:22.400 I don't know.
00:23:22.900 I don't know how this works.
00:23:24.020 All right.
00:23:27.240 Here's a good sign
00:23:28.300 of the times.
00:23:29.440 I saw a Larry Elder tweet.
00:23:32.500 And Larry Elder
00:23:33.120 referring to all these
00:23:34.720 smash and grab videos
00:23:35.920 that we keep seeing.
00:23:37.560 And Larry Elder says,
00:23:39.020 when it comes
00:23:39.660 to the smash and grabs,
00:23:41.060 where's the diversity,
00:23:42.440 equity, and inclusion?
00:23:44.000 White folks,
00:23:44.700 you need to step up.
00:23:47.840 Now, I call that progress.
00:23:49.960 Here's why.
00:23:50.500 If we can't joke
00:23:53.380 about the dumbassery
00:23:55.560 on all people's sides,
00:23:58.800 right?
00:23:59.020 Not on one side,
00:24:00.060 but everybody's side.
00:24:01.080 If we can't joke
00:24:02.700 about race,
00:24:03.780 we'll never fix anything.
00:24:06.240 You've got to be able
00:24:07.100 to joke hard
00:24:08.220 about a topic
00:24:09.680 before you have
00:24:10.560 any hope
00:24:11.380 that you're going to be able
00:24:12.060 to talk honestly about it.
00:24:14.140 So Larry Elder,
00:24:16.420 maybe a signal
00:24:17.480 of positive change.
00:24:21.500 It was just making
00:24:22.380 a joke about it,
00:24:23.600 the racial composition
00:24:26.380 of the smash and grabbers.
00:24:29.180 That's where it needs to be.
00:24:30.240 We need to be able
00:24:30.760 to joke about it.
00:24:32.220 If you don't follow
00:24:33.500 Jeff Charles
00:24:34.380 on the X platform,
00:24:37.020 he's a good follow.
00:24:38.280 And he's doing
00:24:38.860 sort of a funny thing.
00:24:40.060 I think he's still doing it.
00:24:40.980 He did it for a while.
00:24:42.680 In which you would,
00:24:43.880 sort of in response
00:24:45.360 to all the videos
00:24:47.040 that show black use,
00:24:48.740 robbing stores and stuff,
00:24:50.500 I think it was
00:24:51.360 kind of a response.
00:24:52.180 I'm not sure
00:24:52.540 that's how he would put it.
00:24:54.100 But he would show
00:24:55.440 what he called
00:24:56.300 people of whiteness,
00:24:58.880 white people,
00:25:00.460 people of whiteness
00:25:01.480 doing ridiculously stupid
00:25:03.380 and dangerous things.
00:25:04.760 You know,
00:25:05.340 like a white guy
00:25:06.480 who's opening a gate
00:25:07.440 for a wild bear
00:25:08.320 to walk through
00:25:08.980 and the bear
00:25:10.420 mauls him
00:25:11.120 on the way past.
00:25:12.360 Really,
00:25:12.740 he just,
00:25:13.080 he needed to open
00:25:13.760 the gate.
00:25:14.320 He didn't need
00:25:14.800 to stand next to the gate
00:25:16.000 to let the wild bear
00:25:17.980 walk through.
00:25:18.840 The bear walks through
00:25:19.580 and it just
00:25:19.880 mauls him
00:25:20.720 on the way by.
00:25:22.580 And so,
00:25:23.520 Jeff Charles does,
00:25:24.820 you know,
00:25:25.120 posts,
00:25:25.840 people of whiteness,
00:25:27.520 you know,
00:25:27.680 stop doing this.
00:25:29.840 Now,
00:25:30.320 that's funny.
00:25:32.380 Because indeed,
00:25:33.440 there are a lot
00:25:34.100 of videos
00:25:34.640 of white people
00:25:35.740 doing things
00:25:36.340 that are clearly dangerous
00:25:37.480 and ill-advised.
00:25:39.020 So he has an infinite,
00:25:40.640 you know,
00:25:40.960 pool of things
00:25:41.680 to pick from.
00:25:42.660 But if you can't
00:25:43.640 laugh about that,
00:25:45.380 you're not getting
00:25:46.220 any closer
00:25:46.760 to any kind
00:25:47.320 of a solution.
00:25:49.640 All right.
00:25:53.180 Here's another
00:25:54.020 saying I have
00:25:56.340 about certainty.
00:25:59.480 If you see
00:26:00.260 somebody who's certain,
00:26:02.020 they see something
00:26:02.740 in the news
00:26:03.320 that's kind of complicated,
00:26:04.640 and they're certain
00:26:05.620 something is true.
00:26:07.440 For example,
00:26:08.080 they're certain
00:26:08.720 that Joe Biden
00:26:09.480 is guilty of crimes.
00:26:11.120 Or they're certain
00:26:12.080 he isn't.
00:26:13.520 Either way.
00:26:15.200 Certainty is a failure
00:26:16.300 of imagination.
00:26:18.060 It's not something
00:26:19.000 you should be proud of.
00:26:20.620 If you can't imagine
00:26:22.060 how you could be wrong,
00:26:24.820 then your mental capacity
00:26:27.100 is a little bit stilted.
00:26:29.920 It's a little bit blocked.
00:26:31.880 Right?
00:26:32.880 For the things
00:26:33.880 that I'm, you know,
00:26:35.160 reasonably sure are true,
00:26:37.460 it's because I've run out
00:26:38.920 of imagination.
00:26:40.560 I simply can't imagine
00:26:41.900 an alternative.
00:26:43.680 But there could be.
00:26:45.380 This is why I say
00:26:46.560 that you're in better shape
00:26:47.720 if you've learned magic
00:26:48.920 as a kid.
00:26:50.180 You know, magic tricks.
00:26:52.980 Imagine if you'd never seen
00:26:55.600 how magic tricks are done.
00:26:57.700 The beauty of watching
00:26:58.860 a lot of magic tricks
00:26:59.840 and then later learning
00:27:00.800 how they're done
00:27:01.340 is that you realize
00:27:04.760 your imagination
00:27:05.460 is the problem.
00:27:06.880 You sit there
00:27:07.480 and you watch the magician
00:27:08.320 do a trick
00:27:08.900 and you say to yourself,
00:27:10.120 damn it,
00:27:11.200 I cannot imagine
00:27:12.640 how that could be done.
00:27:14.200 Like, that looks like
00:27:15.040 actual magic.
00:27:15.880 My imagination
00:27:16.480 is just limited.
00:27:17.400 I can't even imagine
00:27:19.320 how that could be done.
00:27:21.280 Now, if you've had
00:27:22.640 that experience
00:27:23.200 with magic tricks,
00:27:25.140 then you can bring that
00:27:26.160 into the real world
00:27:27.080 and when the politician
00:27:29.480 says,
00:27:30.180 this is true,
00:27:31.780 whatever it is,
00:27:32.580 this is true,
00:27:33.740 and you say to yourself,
00:27:35.160 God,
00:27:35.940 I can't even imagine
00:27:37.240 how that would not be true.
00:27:39.180 I mean,
00:27:39.660 there's the video,
00:27:40.680 they showed the proof,
00:27:41.600 here's the data.
00:27:42.680 Yeah, I can't even imagine
00:27:43.780 how that would not be true.
00:27:44.960 That is a failure
00:27:46.880 of imagination.
00:27:48.880 It's not a virtue
00:27:50.200 that you have certainty.
00:27:52.420 You just don't have
00:27:53.600 the imagination
00:27:54.220 for how you could
00:27:55.180 have been fooled.
00:27:56.280 And I would argue
00:27:57.200 that most of the problems
00:27:58.980 in the country
00:27:59.700 are a lack of imagination
00:28:02.020 because that lack
00:28:03.980 of imagination
00:28:04.680 allows you to be fooled
00:28:06.260 with certainty.
00:28:08.840 Being fooled
00:28:09.720 is bad enough,
00:28:10.560 but being fooled
00:28:11.340 and making people think
00:28:12.600 they're sure
00:28:13.360 of what's true
00:28:14.100 when it's the opposite,
00:28:15.960 that's really dangerous.
00:28:17.660 So,
00:28:18.700 Elon Musk learned
00:28:19.840 magic and hypnosis
00:28:21.020 when he was young,
00:28:22.220 according to the biography.
00:28:24.580 Do you think
00:28:24.980 that makes him better
00:28:25.860 at spotting bullshit?
00:28:28.560 Probably.
00:28:30.020 Because he knows
00:28:31.440 that when he sees something,
00:28:34.060 it could not,
00:28:34.860 there's a possibility
00:28:35.740 it's not true,
00:28:37.420 even though he can't imagine
00:28:39.060 how that's possible.
00:28:40.640 You still have
00:28:41.300 the intellectual capacity
00:28:43.400 to say,
00:28:44.000 it could be not true,
00:28:45.040 I just don't know why.
00:28:46.940 Now,
00:28:47.420 this brings us
00:28:47.960 to Neil deGrasse Tyson,
00:28:50.560 who was on
00:28:51.940 Trigonometry podcast
00:28:53.260 recently.
00:28:54.500 He was talking about
00:28:55.400 the rogue experts
00:28:57.000 versus the majority
00:28:58.900 of experts.
00:28:59.860 And he made the point
00:29:01.000 that I've made before
00:29:02.180 that I'm now going
00:29:04.760 to modify.
00:29:05.580 so I would have
00:29:08.000 agreed with him
00:29:08.960 before the pandemic
00:29:10.500 and the opinion,
00:29:12.200 well,
00:29:12.460 and I did,
00:29:13.240 and the opinion
00:29:13.820 goes like this.
00:29:15.420 If there's a rogue expert
00:29:17.580 who's looking at
00:29:19.120 basically the same information
00:29:20.440 as everybody else,
00:29:21.520 but the rogue says,
00:29:23.560 no,
00:29:24.020 no,
00:29:24.360 it's all wrong
00:29:25.080 and the 100,000 experts
00:29:27.440 are all wrong,
00:29:29.360 Neil deGrasse Tyson
00:29:30.560 tells us,
00:29:31.600 and I've told you
00:29:32.320 this before,
00:29:33.360 you could bet
00:29:34.600 on the majority
00:29:35.740 being right
00:29:36.440 and that the rogue
00:29:38.300 is wrong.
00:29:39.300 And the reason is
00:29:40.120 for every,
00:29:41.240 and he says this directly,
00:29:42.820 for every 10,000 rogues
00:29:44.880 who make a claim,
00:29:45.800 oh,
00:29:46.140 the mainstream people
00:29:47.400 are wrong,
00:29:48.540 almost every one of them
00:29:50.000 will in fact
00:29:51.400 be wrong in the end.
00:29:53.620 So if the only thing
00:29:54.920 you knew
00:29:55.360 is that thousands
00:29:56.320 of people
00:29:56.840 were on one side
00:29:57.700 and there was
00:29:58.060 this one rogue person
00:29:59.960 and you had to bet,
00:30:01.360 you had to put
00:30:02.840 your money on it,
00:30:04.180 you should bet
00:30:04.800 against the rogue
00:30:05.920 because your odds
00:30:07.400 are like 10,000 to one,
00:30:09.000 better that the rogue
00:30:10.540 is wrong.
00:30:11.880 Now,
00:30:13.360 that made sense
00:30:14.560 before the pandemic.
00:30:16.580 Well,
00:30:17.160 no,
00:30:17.480 it didn't make sense
00:30:18.120 before the pandemic.
00:30:19.160 It felt like it made sense
00:30:20.660 before the pandemic,
00:30:21.780 very different.
00:30:22.660 It felt like it made sense.
00:30:24.580 After the pandemic,
00:30:26.480 here's what we can know
00:30:27.440 for sure.
00:30:28.640 If there's any money
00:30:30.300 involved in the question,
00:30:32.660 the money will determine
00:30:33.900 how the majority goes,
00:30:36.160 not the data.
00:30:38.420 Everybody agree?
00:30:40.260 If you have a situation
00:30:42.120 where nobody has
00:30:43.200 any money to make
00:30:44.080 and 10,000 people
00:30:46.100 think something's true
00:30:47.060 and one says it's wrong,
00:30:49.000 bet on the 10,000
00:30:50.340 because there's
00:30:51.380 no money involved.
00:30:52.580 They're just telling you
00:30:53.560 what they think is true.
00:30:55.480 Now,
00:30:55.920 that doesn't mean
00:30:56.460 that the rogue
00:30:57.100 will always be wrong,
00:30:58.280 but as
00:30:59.440 Neil deGrasse Tyson
00:31:01.140 accurately points out,
00:31:03.140 with that one time
00:31:03.980 that the rogue
00:31:04.620 gets it right,
00:31:05.740 there's stories
00:31:06.300 and books
00:31:06.840 and it becomes
00:31:08.080 part of our history.
00:31:09.540 But the 10,000
00:31:10.660 who are wrong,
00:31:11.960 you never hear from them
00:31:12.880 again because
00:31:13.320 they were just wrong.
00:31:14.880 So,
00:31:15.300 I would say that
00:31:16.120 if no money
00:31:17.680 is on the line,
00:31:19.180 bet on the majority,
00:31:20.880 which doesn't mean
00:31:21.640 they'll always be right,
00:31:22.800 but it's a smart bet.
00:31:23.660 And if lots of money
00:31:25.740 is involved,
00:31:27.380 all bets are off.
00:31:30.080 Does that sound like
00:31:30.980 a good rule of thumb?
00:31:32.280 And during the pandemic,
00:31:33.620 lots of money
00:31:34.340 was involved,
00:31:35.720 so that made the rogues
00:31:37.880 as credible
00:31:39.220 as the experts,
00:31:40.760 which was exactly
00:31:41.900 zero in both cases.
00:31:44.000 In my opinion,
00:31:45.800 the rogues
00:31:46.340 were worth zero,
00:31:47.480 but also the majority
00:31:49.020 of people
00:31:49.400 were worth zero.
00:31:50.500 So it was two zeros.
00:31:51.420 If you had certainty
00:31:53.500 that the rogues
00:31:55.520 were right,
00:31:56.300 that's a failure
00:31:57.260 of imagination.
00:31:59.220 That's not something
00:31:59.920 you should be proud of.
00:32:04.340 I know.
00:32:05.060 I say that
00:32:05.520 to make people mad
00:32:06.380 because people
00:32:07.260 who got the right answer
00:32:08.380 according to them
00:32:09.920 are pretty sure
00:32:11.240 that it's because
00:32:12.100 they were right
00:32:12.720 and they thought it through.
00:32:14.180 But we don't work that way.
00:32:15.740 That's not the way
00:32:16.340 humans are wired.
00:32:17.740 We are wired
00:32:18.500 to think we were right
00:32:19.400 and we knew it all along
00:32:20.480 once we know
00:32:21.240 the answer.
00:32:22.920 And so we do.
00:32:24.920 All right.
00:32:27.360 So Elon Musk
00:32:28.320 went to Eagle Pass
00:32:29.380 at the border
00:32:29.940 and did some
00:32:31.380 Periscope videos
00:32:33.180 showing how
00:32:34.320 the situation is there.
00:32:35.480 I don't know
00:32:36.040 that we learned anything
00:32:37.020 that we didn't already know.
00:32:39.180 But
00:32:39.600 somehow the news
00:32:42.280 is changed
00:32:43.080 by the fact
00:32:43.740 that Elon Musk
00:32:44.600 went and observed it
00:32:46.000 in person
00:32:46.360 and then talked about it.
00:32:48.760 And it makes me wonder
00:32:50.020 why in the world
00:32:50.920 is he doing it?
00:32:53.880 Why does Elon Musk
00:32:55.080 have to be the person
00:32:55.920 who goes to the border?
00:32:57.500 And I think
00:32:57.900 part of it is
00:32:59.280 he's
00:32:59.640 trying to do marketing
00:33:02.060 for
00:33:02.480 the Periscope
00:33:04.100 live stream.
00:33:05.400 So that's good.
00:33:06.360 Glad he's doing that.
00:33:07.920 And part of it is
00:33:08.900 it's the biggest problem
00:33:10.040 in the country
00:33:10.480 probably
00:33:10.940 or one of them.
00:33:13.040 And it seems
00:33:14.020 to be under-attended.
00:33:15.380 So he's just
00:33:15.920 taking responsibility.
00:33:16.700 That's a very dad
00:33:17.940 thing to do
00:33:18.500 isn't it?
00:33:19.600 It's not his job.
00:33:21.420 It wasn't his job
00:33:22.280 to fix free speech
00:33:23.400 but he felt
00:33:24.440 it needed to be done.
00:33:25.680 It wasn't his job
00:33:26.580 to make
00:33:27.780 people a
00:33:29.420 space-faring
00:33:31.140 civilization
00:33:32.920 but he's doing it.
00:33:36.240 So I love that.
00:33:37.480 I don't know
00:33:37.840 that anything
00:33:38.200 will change
00:33:38.960 but I do like
00:33:40.180 that he's pushing
00:33:41.000 citizen journalism.
00:33:42.220 I signed on
00:33:45.140 to a news site
00:33:45.840 today
00:33:46.180 and I won't
00:33:47.820 name names
00:33:48.480 but it didn't
00:33:49.300 look like
00:33:49.680 they have any
00:33:50.200 reporters anymore.
00:33:51.760 It looked like
00:33:52.620 it was all
00:33:52.960 just press releases.
00:33:54.420 It looked like
00:33:55.220 the news
00:33:55.740 had just stopped.
00:33:56.900 It was the
00:33:57.260 weirdest thing.
00:33:59.060 It was just
00:33:59.740 opinions and
00:34:00.360 press releases.
00:34:02.020 Alright,
00:34:02.780 so maybe we need
00:34:03.560 citizen journalism
00:34:04.460 because otherwise
00:34:05.280 we won't know
00:34:06.040 anything ever.
00:34:08.200 He's right about that.
00:34:12.220 Alright,
00:34:13.840 are you watching
00:34:14.880 the impeachment
00:34:15.580 inquiry?
00:34:17.320 The impeachment
00:34:18.520 inquiry is
00:34:19.800 a little
00:34:20.420 laboratory
00:34:20.900 where you can
00:34:22.360 learn about
00:34:22.980 persuasion
00:34:23.620 and what's
00:34:24.960 wrong with
00:34:25.360 the government
00:34:25.860 and you can
00:34:26.860 see every
00:34:27.700 example of
00:34:28.620 everything.
00:34:30.280 Now,
00:34:30.540 AOC
00:34:30.900 had her
00:34:32.120 moment where
00:34:33.120 she argued
00:34:34.380 passionately
00:34:35.240 against the
00:34:37.760 impeachment inquiry
00:34:38.640 and the thought
00:34:39.600 that Joe Biden
00:34:40.240 had done
00:34:40.580 anything wrong.
00:34:41.400 Oh my God.
00:34:43.760 And I was
00:34:45.040 going to actually
00:34:45.520 play AOC's
00:34:46.700 entire thing
00:34:48.000 because it's a
00:34:49.320 master class
00:34:50.020 in persuasion.
00:34:51.860 So her
00:34:52.620 persuasion game
00:34:53.840 is super strong.
00:34:55.480 So let me tell you
00:34:56.040 a few things
00:34:56.500 she does right.
00:34:57.600 First of all,
00:34:59.160 the whole
00:34:59.900 situation around
00:35:01.140 the Bidens
00:35:01.640 is too complicated
00:35:02.640 for 95%
00:35:05.840 of voters.
00:35:07.360 So 95%
00:35:08.580 of voters
00:35:09.000 will never know
00:35:09.680 what's actually
00:35:10.460 happening.
00:35:11.400 So in that
00:35:12.060 situation,
00:35:12.820 who is the
00:35:13.600 best persuader
00:35:14.440 wins.
00:35:15.360 And they can
00:35:16.040 be completely
00:35:16.620 divorced from
00:35:19.060 reality.
00:35:20.080 They just have
00:35:20.620 to persuade.
00:35:21.540 So given
00:35:21.960 that the public
00:35:22.540 has no idea
00:35:23.460 what really
00:35:24.660 happened with
00:35:25.220 the Biden
00:35:25.560 situation,
00:35:26.920 she says,
00:35:28.640 she first
00:35:30.680 of all,
00:35:31.020 acts very
00:35:31.480 confident.
00:35:33.040 The confidence
00:35:33.640 itself is part
00:35:35.860 of the persuasion.
00:35:36.600 And I watched
00:35:38.180 her ask
00:35:39.360 witness questions
00:35:40.500 and then
00:35:42.160 act as though
00:35:43.100 the answers
00:35:43.840 to the question
00:35:44.700 proved her
00:35:46.000 point when
00:35:47.360 it didn't even
00:35:47.940 come close.
00:35:49.280 But because the
00:35:50.260 people watching it
00:35:51.060 can't tell the
00:35:51.640 difference,
00:35:53.060 she made it look
00:35:53.720 like they proved
00:35:54.560 her point.
00:35:55.040 I'll give you
00:35:55.740 an exaggerated
00:35:56.720 joke version
00:35:58.200 of AOC.
00:35:59.300 All right.
00:36:00.960 Is it true
00:36:01.420 that the sky
00:36:02.000 is blue?
00:36:03.180 Well,
00:36:03.680 now it's
00:36:04.120 actually a
00:36:04.640 little cloudy
00:36:05.180 out today.
00:36:05.960 But is the
00:36:06.520 sky blue
00:36:07.020 in someplace
00:36:07.560 else?
00:36:08.900 Probably,
00:36:09.460 yeah,
00:36:09.620 probably the
00:36:09.980 sky is blue.
00:36:10.720 Right,
00:36:11.320 the sky is
00:36:11.940 blue in
00:36:12.260 someplace else.
00:36:13.200 And did
00:36:13.880 the Republicans
00:36:15.100 once say
00:36:15.780 that it was
00:36:16.740 raining in
00:36:17.660 Nigeria once?
00:36:20.840 I don't know.
00:36:21.640 Well,
00:36:21.760 they did.
00:36:22.220 They once said
00:36:22.780 it was raining
00:36:23.380 in Nigeria.
00:36:24.880 So,
00:36:25.460 let me get
00:36:25.880 this straight.
00:36:26.600 You're telling
00:36:27.140 us that there
00:36:27.860 are places
00:36:28.320 it's not raining.
00:36:29.040 Is that
00:36:29.400 correct?
00:36:30.700 Yeah.
00:36:31.880 And the
00:36:32.500 Republicans
00:36:33.120 said that it
00:36:34.120 once rained
00:36:34.620 in Nigeria.
00:36:35.320 Is that
00:36:35.560 correct?
00:36:37.480 Probably.
00:36:39.020 All right.
00:36:39.700 And that is
00:36:40.180 why this
00:36:40.580 entire thing
00:36:42.020 is a farce.
00:36:43.180 It's a farce.
00:36:44.600 Can't you
00:36:45.200 see it?
00:36:45.960 It's a farce.
00:36:48.000 So,
00:36:48.640 that's the
00:36:49.120 joke version.
00:36:51.520 But when
00:36:52.280 you watch
00:36:52.700 her asking
00:36:53.180 questions,
00:36:54.220 the assumption
00:36:55.020 that you have
00:36:55.900 is that those
00:36:56.560 questions ever
00:36:57.400 made sense.
00:36:58.100 yes or
00:36:59.140 that the
00:36:59.580 answer is
00:37:01.520 in the
00:37:01.820 right context.
00:37:03.040 It was
00:37:03.520 actually just
00:37:04.280 complete blah,
00:37:05.360 blah,
00:37:05.640 blah that
00:37:06.760 her mannerisms
00:37:08.780 sold as
00:37:10.900 proving a
00:37:11.440 point.
00:37:12.080 It was kind
00:37:12.640 of a genius
00:37:13.180 move.
00:37:14.460 It was
00:37:14.840 really good.
00:37:17.140 There was
00:37:17.660 no connection
00:37:18.440 to facts or
00:37:19.560 process.
00:37:21.240 She just
00:37:21.700 got somebody
00:37:22.180 to say yes
00:37:22.780 and no
00:37:23.200 and then
00:37:24.180 sold it
00:37:24.800 to the
00:37:25.100 public as
00:37:25.880 though she
00:37:26.180 had just
00:37:26.460 won a
00:37:26.860 case.
00:37:28.380 And none
00:37:28.700 of it was
00:37:29.120 even connected
00:37:29.820 to the
00:37:31.700 question.
00:37:32.180 It was just
00:37:32.520 the most
00:37:32.960 random bunch
00:37:33.640 of bullshit.
00:37:35.360 It was
00:37:35.920 brilliant.
00:37:37.040 Really
00:37:37.240 brilliant.
00:37:39.820 All right.
00:37:41.620 And then
00:37:42.420 the Democrats
00:37:44.600 are also
00:37:45.080 saying this.
00:37:45.800 Is it true
00:37:47.660 that there are
00:37:48.100 no fact
00:37:48.700 witnesses
00:37:49.200 today?
00:37:50.620 Well,
00:37:50.940 yeah,
00:37:51.120 that's true.
00:37:51.840 There we
00:37:52.120 go.
00:37:52.600 No fact
00:37:53.000 witnesses.
00:37:53.720 No fact
00:37:54.080 witnesses.
00:37:55.760 But did
00:37:56.440 that matter?
00:37:58.020 No.
00:37:58.800 The right
00:37:59.360 question was
00:37:59.980 does it
00:38:00.420 matter if
00:38:01.840 there are
00:38:02.080 any fact
00:38:02.600 witnesses
00:38:03.080 here today?
00:38:04.100 And then
00:38:04.420 the answer
00:38:04.780 would have
00:38:05.020 been,
00:38:05.320 well,
00:38:05.500 not for
00:38:05.820 the inquiry.
00:38:07.220 For the
00:38:07.860 inquiry we
00:38:08.500 have documents
00:38:09.540 and we
00:38:10.580 can show
00:38:10.940 you the
00:38:11.200 documents.
00:38:12.400 So the
00:38:12.780 documents serve
00:38:13.740 as the
00:38:14.060 evidence.
00:38:15.060 That's why
00:38:15.520 we're here.
00:38:17.080 Oh,
00:38:17.280 but are there
00:38:17.720 any fact
00:38:18.380 witnesses
00:38:18.780 here?
00:38:19.660 There are
00:38:19.820 no fact
00:38:20.200 witnesses?
00:38:21.700 Are you
00:38:21.980 telling me
00:38:22.240 there are
00:38:22.400 no fact
00:38:22.840 witnesses?
00:38:23.920 Oh,
00:38:24.260 but in
00:38:24.620 another case
00:38:25.220 that had
00:38:26.880 nothing to
00:38:27.340 do with
00:38:27.580 this case
00:38:28.040 and is
00:38:28.700 not a
00:38:29.020 precedent
00:38:29.360 in any
00:38:29.760 way,
00:38:30.020 was there
00:38:30.320 ever a
00:38:30.660 fact
00:38:30.860 witness?
00:38:31.600 Oh,
00:38:31.800 there was.
00:38:32.520 There was.
00:38:33.200 So in
00:38:33.500 the past,
00:38:34.920 there was
00:38:35.260 a fact
00:38:35.640 witness.
00:38:36.320 But let
00:38:36.700 me clarify,
00:38:37.600 there is
00:38:37.840 no fact
00:38:38.340 witness
00:38:38.640 here.
00:38:39.340 None
00:38:39.600 of it
00:38:39.800 matters.
00:38:41.240 It's
00:38:41.620 not
00:38:41.840 relevant
00:38:42.400 to the
00:38:43.900 inquiry.
00:38:45.100 It's
00:38:45.520 just
00:38:45.680 something
00:38:45.980 that sounds
00:38:46.560 good if
00:38:47.560 you didn't
00:38:47.840 know anything
00:38:48.400 about how
00:38:48.880 anything
00:38:49.240 works.
00:38:50.280 But it
00:38:50.900 sounded really
00:38:51.580 good.
00:38:51.920 It was
00:38:52.080 very
00:38:52.320 persuasive.
00:38:55.860 I have a
00:38:56.560 question.
00:38:58.900 Did,
00:39:00.300 is it
00:39:00.820 Senator
00:39:01.320 Raskin,
00:39:02.280 the one who
00:39:02.760 had the,
00:39:03.280 he had the
00:39:04.920 rag on his
00:39:05.500 head because he
00:39:06.220 had some
00:39:06.780 cancer treatments?
00:39:09.060 Jamie
00:39:11.660 Raskin?
00:39:12.720 So now he
00:39:13.600 doesn't have
00:39:14.280 the rag on
00:39:14.820 his head,
00:39:15.660 but he has
00:39:16.560 something closer
00:39:17.220 to a full
00:39:17.800 head of
00:39:18.100 hair?
00:39:20.720 So that
00:39:21.760 would be
00:39:22.020 like,
00:39:22.640 did he
00:39:23.020 get like
00:39:23.640 reverse
00:39:24.140 cancer?
00:39:25.340 The kind
00:39:25.840 that if
00:39:26.280 you take
00:39:26.640 chemo,
00:39:27.140 it adds
00:39:27.420 hair to
00:39:27.720 your head?
00:39:29.060 It doesn't
00:39:29.780 look like a
00:39:30.260 wig because
00:39:30.760 it's not
00:39:31.140 that good.
00:39:33.260 Did he
00:39:33.820 get hair
00:39:34.260 transplants?
00:39:35.960 Did he
00:39:36.240 just get
00:39:36.580 plugs and
00:39:37.160 call the
00:39:37.500 cancer?
00:39:39.060 No,
00:39:40.760 the hair
00:39:41.000 grows back,
00:39:42.080 but it
00:39:42.600 doesn't grow
00:39:43.060 back better
00:39:43.660 than it
00:39:43.980 was before
00:39:44.560 the cancer,
00:39:45.460 before the
00:39:46.540 chemo.
00:39:47.700 You're
00:39:47.940 saying chemo
00:39:48.860 makes his
00:39:49.280 hair grow?
00:39:52.340 It didn't
00:39:52.940 look like a
00:39:53.400 wig.
00:39:54.520 I don't know.
00:39:55.460 Well,
00:39:55.920 I got
00:39:56.300 questions since
00:39:57.340 I don't trust
00:39:57.920 anybody about
00:39:58.600 anything.
00:40:00.600 All right.
00:40:01.980 The House
00:40:02.400 Ways and
00:40:03.040 Means Committee
00:40:04.380 released a
00:40:05.040 document that
00:40:06.940 an IRS
00:40:07.600 agent,
00:40:08.260 relayed an
00:40:10.160 inquiry from
00:40:10.780 the CNN
00:40:11.280 producer.
00:40:12.620 So here's
00:40:13.000 the story.
00:40:13.540 Allegedly,
00:40:14.100 a CNN
00:40:14.500 producer
00:40:15.840 claimed to
00:40:17.520 have an
00:40:17.820 email,
00:40:18.280 when I
00:40:18.600 guess he
00:40:18.920 was trying
00:40:19.760 to get
00:40:20.020 more
00:40:20.200 information
00:40:20.620 from the
00:40:21.040 IRS,
00:40:22.220 but claimed
00:40:22.780 to have
00:40:23.080 an email
00:40:23.560 in which
00:40:24.700 Hunter
00:40:25.220 Biden
00:40:25.580 complained
00:40:28.100 that all
00:40:28.560 of his
00:40:28.820 stuff would
00:40:29.520 go away
00:40:30.000 once his
00:40:30.620 father was
00:40:31.160 elected
00:40:31.460 president.
00:40:32.920 So nobody
00:40:33.720 has found
00:40:34.160 this email.
00:40:34.740 It's only
00:40:35.480 an alleged
00:40:35.960 email.
00:40:37.220 But the
00:40:38.320 implication is
00:40:39.260 that Biden
00:40:39.800 knew that
00:40:40.260 once his
00:40:40.680 father was
00:40:41.440 president,
00:40:42.440 that his
00:40:42.740 legal problems
00:40:43.580 would be
00:40:44.140 no more.
00:40:47.060 Do you
00:40:47.640 think that
00:40:48.060 CNN
00:40:48.360 necessarily
00:40:49.100 had an
00:40:49.700 email,
00:40:50.640 or was
00:40:51.100 the CNN
00:40:51.560 producer
00:40:52.200 lying to
00:40:54.220 get somebody
00:40:55.380 to say
00:40:55.740 something and
00:40:56.300 didn't really
00:40:56.740 have an
00:40:57.020 email?
00:40:58.220 I don't
00:40:58.700 know.
00:40:59.600 I would
00:41:00.060 not trust
00:41:00.760 it.
00:41:01.500 I would
00:41:02.100 not trust
00:41:02.600 it.
00:41:03.520 So everything
00:41:04.000 about this
00:41:04.520 story is
00:41:04.940 sketchy.
00:41:06.780 So I
00:41:07.420 put this
00:41:07.900 in the
00:41:08.540 don't
00:41:08.960 believe
00:41:09.160 anything
00:41:09.420 about
00:41:09.740 it
00:41:09.880 category.
00:41:12.820 All
00:41:13.300 right.
00:41:19.180 That,
00:41:19.860 ladies and
00:41:20.260 gentlemen,
00:41:21.880 might be
00:41:22.980 just about
00:41:23.400 all I
00:41:23.680 had today.
00:41:24.860 It's a
00:41:25.420 weird kind
00:41:26.240 of day,
00:41:26.620 isn't it,
00:41:26.900 where the
00:41:27.320 news is
00:41:27.840 super
00:41:28.140 complicated?
00:41:28.740 Did you
00:41:30.700 notice that
00:41:31.400 it's a
00:41:32.080 day after
00:41:32.520 the
00:41:32.700 Republican
00:41:33.160 debate and
00:41:33.920 nobody
00:41:34.220 cares?
00:41:36.140 Literally
00:41:36.700 nobody
00:41:37.200 cares.
00:41:39.140 Because
00:41:39.740 none of
00:41:40.500 it
00:41:40.620 mattered.
00:41:41.660 As long
00:41:42.320 as Trump
00:41:42.960 is still
00:41:43.380 in it,
00:41:43.660 none of
00:41:43.880 it mattered.
00:41:46.120 Right.
00:41:47.160 Now I
00:41:47.740 saw,
00:41:48.540 who was
00:41:49.680 it,
00:41:50.880 who's the
00:41:51.400 new,
00:41:51.760 who's the
00:41:56.320 new House
00:41:56.700 Speaker?
00:41:57.060 what's
00:41:58.580 his name?
00:42:00.480 New
00:42:00.960 Speaker?
00:42:01.980 No,
00:42:02.460 the
00:42:02.580 minority
00:42:02.960 speaker.
00:42:06.960 No,
00:42:07.920 the
00:42:08.380 minority.
00:42:11.760 Hakeem
00:42:12.260 Jeffries.
00:42:12.940 And when I
00:42:13.300 say minority,
00:42:14.100 I do not
00:42:14.500 mean that
00:42:14.980 he's a
00:42:15.300 minority.
00:42:16.200 I mean
00:42:16.680 that he's
00:42:17.120 the
00:42:17.300 minority
00:42:17.640 leader.
00:42:19.100 So
00:42:19.220 Hakeem
00:42:19.560 Jeffries
00:42:19.980 was
00:42:24.020 wondering
00:42:24.420 why the
00:42:25.900 Republicans
00:42:26.380 were wasting
00:42:27.060 so much
00:42:27.500 time and
00:42:27.880 money on
00:42:28.320 this
00:42:28.560 impeachment
00:42:29.460 inquiry,
00:42:30.240 in which
00:42:31.120 there are
00:42:31.760 no fact
00:42:32.180 witnesses.
00:42:34.060 So I
00:42:34.840 responded,
00:42:35.620 revenge.
00:42:37.560 It's
00:42:37.780 revenge.
00:42:39.060 I'm not
00:42:39.780 sure it
00:42:40.240 would have
00:42:40.460 happened if
00:42:41.640 Trump had
00:42:42.380 not been
00:42:42.900 impeached
00:42:43.440 twice,
00:42:44.160 or attempted,
00:42:44.800 or whatever
00:42:45.100 happened.
00:42:46.200 And to
00:42:47.440 me it's
00:42:47.720 just payback.
00:42:49.220 And I
00:42:49.980 don't have a
00:42:50.360 problem with
00:42:50.700 that at
00:42:50.960 all.
00:42:51.720 Because that's
00:42:52.620 how karma
00:42:53.320 works.
00:42:54.980 I would
00:42:55.560 say that
00:42:56.100 we've
00:42:56.900 reached the
00:42:57.320 point where
00:42:57.880 all the
00:42:58.320 normal
00:42:58.680 controls are
00:42:59.480 off, and
00:43:01.480 we're into
00:43:02.340 full, you
00:43:04.200 know,
00:43:06.900 guaranteed
00:43:07.640 destruction
00:43:08.320 mode.
00:43:09.120 I think
00:43:09.640 both sides
00:43:10.300 are trying to
00:43:10.940 destroy the
00:43:11.700 other.
00:43:12.600 They're not
00:43:12.980 trying to
00:43:13.360 win a race
00:43:14.020 and have
00:43:14.660 four years
00:43:15.220 of their
00:43:15.480 team in
00:43:15.940 charge.
00:43:17.800 They're
00:43:18.240 trying to
00:43:18.540 put the
00:43:18.760 other side
00:43:19.080 in jail.
00:43:19.940 So I
00:43:20.420 think this
00:43:20.800 will be the
00:43:21.300 first election
00:43:21.940 in which you
00:43:22.480 can guarantee
00:43:23.140 the loser
00:43:23.680 will end
00:43:24.120 up in
00:43:24.380 jail.
00:43:26.280 Would you
00:43:26.820 agree with
00:43:27.140 that?
00:43:27.920 That the
00:43:28.480 loser will
00:43:29.000 end up in
00:43:29.480 jail,
00:43:30.560 2024 election
00:43:31.640 loser?
00:43:35.160 I think
00:43:35.740 so.
00:43:36.360 I think
00:43:36.780 that's
00:43:37.060 actually a
00:43:37.520 real thing
00:43:37.880 that could
00:43:38.140 happen.
00:43:39.080 Now,
00:43:40.980 it might
00:43:41.940 be if
00:43:42.260 Trump loses
00:43:42.840 they'll figure
00:43:43.380 they don't
00:43:43.740 have to put
00:43:44.200 him in
00:43:44.440 jail and
00:43:44.800 it would
00:43:45.000 just make
00:43:45.360 everybody
00:43:45.680 angry so
00:43:46.240 it's not
00:43:46.540 worth it.
00:43:47.840 But certainly
00:43:49.200 the risk is
00:43:50.060 totally there.
00:43:52.480 Yeah, and
00:43:54.080 the fact
00:43:54.460 that the
00:43:55.680 fact that
00:43:56.400 the Democrats
00:44:00.120 have come up
00:44:00.740 with MAGA
00:44:01.340 extremists,
00:44:03.360 so they
00:44:03.760 don't, now
00:44:04.880 they're not
00:44:05.280 saying that
00:44:05.740 there's MAGA
00:44:06.340 and that
00:44:06.940 there's some
00:44:07.680 extremists,
00:44:08.720 now they're
00:44:09.440 MAGA
00:44:09.820 extremists.
00:44:11.500 That's
00:44:11.820 dangerous.
00:44:13.140 As soon as
00:44:13.800 you hear
00:44:14.040 there are MAGA
00:44:14.640 extremists
00:44:15.400 and you're
00:44:17.560 associated with
00:44:18.300 them.
00:44:18.420 So, do
00:44:21.420 the math.
00:44:25.080 What would
00:44:25.780 be an
00:44:26.340 appropriate
00:44:26.720 thing that
00:44:27.360 you could
00:44:27.680 do with
00:44:28.220 an
00:44:28.500 extremist?
00:44:30.280 Well, an
00:44:30.940 extremist is
00:44:31.640 probably
00:44:31.920 dangerous.
00:44:33.720 So, you
00:44:34.640 know, the
00:44:35.220 legal system
00:44:36.780 has to deal
00:44:37.340 with extremists.
00:44:38.200 Would you
00:44:38.440 agree?
00:44:39.380 The legal
00:44:40.140 system should
00:44:40.800 deal with
00:44:41.140 extremists
00:44:41.720 because they're
00:44:42.200 dangerous.
00:44:42.780 What about
00:44:45.800 a MAGA
00:44:46.860 extremist?
00:44:48.660 Well, same
00:44:49.560 thing, because
00:44:50.480 if you're an
00:44:50.940 extremist, you're
00:44:51.760 dangerous, whether
00:44:53.040 you have MAGA
00:44:53.800 attached to your
00:44:54.460 name or not.
00:44:55.860 So, now they
00:44:56.440 can take
00:44:56.840 extremists and
00:44:58.240 they can slime
00:44:59.040 the word MAGA
00:44:59.940 with it, and
00:45:01.960 now anybody
00:45:02.800 who's simply
00:45:03.460 MAGA becomes
00:45:05.680 part of the
00:45:06.220 extremist
00:45:06.820 framing.
00:45:08.840 So, basically
00:45:10.020 it's giving
00:45:10.800 permission for
00:45:12.280 violence and
00:45:14.360 legal action
00:45:15.180 against ordinary
00:45:16.660 Republicans.
00:45:18.420 Do you see it
00:45:19.280 that way?
00:45:20.360 If Biden were
00:45:21.300 saying, we
00:45:22.280 don't like the
00:45:22.880 MAGA people, but
00:45:24.200 we really hate
00:45:24.880 the extremists, I
00:45:26.800 would say, all
00:45:27.420 right, that's
00:45:27.920 fair.
00:45:29.280 That's politically
00:45:30.080 fair.
00:45:30.660 He doesn't like
00:45:31.280 MAGA, and he
00:45:32.240 really thinks
00:45:32.960 something should
00:45:33.460 be done against
00:45:34.020 extremists.
00:45:35.340 Fair.
00:45:36.000 But when he
00:45:36.600 says it's MAGA
00:45:37.700 extremists, it
00:45:39.700 seems to me he's
00:45:40.800 weaponizing the
00:45:41.640 government against
00:45:42.280 ordinary voters
00:45:43.520 who would call
00:45:45.160 themselves MAGA.
00:45:46.860 How else can
00:45:47.880 you see it?
00:45:49.780 I mean, to me
00:45:50.260 it seems a very
00:45:51.120 clear, you know,
00:45:52.880 how Hitler
00:45:53.540 treated the Jews
00:45:54.860 kind of situation
00:45:55.740 where you move
00:45:57.420 the country toward
00:45:58.200 that hatred, and
00:45:59.840 maybe you do it a
00:46:01.180 little bit at a
00:46:01.760 time so they
00:46:02.420 don't see it
00:46:02.880 coming.
00:46:03.680 Pretty soon MAGA
00:46:04.700 and extremists will
00:46:06.020 sound like the
00:46:06.580 same thing, right?
00:46:08.180 if you keep
00:46:09.380 saying MAGA
00:46:10.000 extremists, there's
00:46:12.560 only a matter of
00:46:13.160 time before MAGA
00:46:14.120 and extremists
00:46:14.900 sound the same
00:46:15.460 in your head.
00:46:17.920 That's called
00:46:18.840 hypnosis.
00:46:20.860 If I had to
00:46:21.620 guess, the use
00:46:23.660 of MAGA
00:46:24.240 extremists is
00:46:25.180 probably from a
00:46:26.160 hypnotist or
00:46:27.620 somebody who has
00:46:28.460 high-level
00:46:29.680 persuasion skills,
00:46:30.860 because it's a
00:46:31.600 little like their
00:46:32.140 version of dark.
00:46:33.020 You know, it's a
00:46:35.260 little too good
00:46:36.200 for politicians.
00:46:38.120 Politicians would
00:46:38.960 have just said
00:46:39.500 MAGA and also
00:46:41.620 extremists, as
00:46:43.180 they always have.
00:46:44.400 But suddenly,
00:46:46.180 suddenly you see
00:46:47.080 this combination
00:46:48.440 of MAGA
00:46:49.120 extremists.
00:46:50.440 That looks like a
00:46:51.640 professional.
00:46:53.820 And that is
00:46:55.120 very weaponized
00:46:56.380 persuasion,
00:46:57.480 weaponized because
00:46:58.360 it could get
00:46:58.880 somebody killed.
00:46:59.440 MAGA is the
00:47:03.580 new Antifa.
00:47:05.540 Well, I think
00:47:06.120 MAGA should
00:47:06.780 change its name
00:47:07.520 to anti-corruption,
00:47:11.860 which it kind of
00:47:13.660 is.
00:47:14.600 MAGA is kind of
00:47:15.360 anti-corruption,
00:47:16.620 in a way,
00:47:17.680 because MAGA is
00:47:18.440 against corruption
00:47:19.180 of any kind,
00:47:20.900 whether it's
00:47:21.560 wokeness corruption
00:47:22.900 or legal corruption.
00:47:26.240 So yeah, I think
00:47:26.920 that MAGA should
00:47:27.700 just rebrand
00:47:29.440 as anti-corruption
00:47:30.580 because they're
00:47:32.200 going against
00:47:32.920 a guy who's
00:47:33.360 corrupt.
00:47:35.120 And then anytime
00:47:36.160 somebody says,
00:47:37.160 hey, I hate you
00:47:38.800 anti-corruption
00:47:39.600 people, you go,
00:47:40.560 whoa, whoa,
00:47:42.340 look who's in
00:47:42.960 favor of corruption.
00:47:45.160 There's your
00:47:45.800 admission.
00:47:47.300 If you're against
00:47:47.900 the anti-corruption
00:47:48.880 people, well,
00:47:51.580 better watch out.
00:47:54.540 Yeah.
00:47:56.560 All right,
00:47:57.360 ladies and
00:47:57.780 gentlemen, is there
00:47:58.760 anything else I
00:47:59.300 forgot?
00:48:00.160 Any amazing story
00:48:01.360 that you think
00:48:02.260 bears discussion?
00:48:07.780 Patriots against
00:48:08.560 corruption in
00:48:09.320 America, PACA.
00:48:10.560 I like it.
00:48:12.900 Patriots against
00:48:13.720 corruption in
00:48:14.580 America, except it
00:48:15.200 sounds like PAC.
00:48:16.400 I don't like the
00:48:17.260 PAC part of it.
00:48:18.120 against making
00:48:26.800 America great.
00:48:27.920 Now it's the
00:48:28.420 again part that
00:48:29.240 they're against.
00:48:33.320 The way to
00:48:34.260 attack MAGA
00:48:35.420 extremists is by
00:48:37.680 getting rid of
00:48:38.420 MAGA.
00:48:38.720 See, I think MAGA
00:48:40.820 was always a
00:48:41.620 gigantic persuasion
00:48:42.860 mistake.
00:48:44.140 It got popular,
00:48:44.880 but it was a
00:48:45.900 giant mistake
00:48:46.600 because it
00:48:47.480 sounds like
00:48:47.900 MAGGOT.
00:48:50.060 If you were to
00:48:51.060 ask me,
00:48:53.620 is MAGA a
00:48:54.880 good acronym?
00:48:56.320 No.
00:48:57.420 It's the
00:48:58.320 worst.
00:49:03.680 Yeah, there's
00:49:04.840 cocaine on
00:49:06.020 everybody's
00:49:06.520 plane.
00:49:06.780 patriots is
00:49:12.680 evil.
00:49:14.740 Yeah, you
00:49:15.700 think the
00:49:16.140 left doesn't
00:49:16.580 like the word
00:49:17.000 patriot?
00:49:17.560 That's probably
00:49:17.940 true.
00:49:19.500 Yeah, I saw
00:49:22.760 that Dana
00:49:25.720 Perino talked
00:49:28.020 about her
00:49:28.720 questions.
00:49:31.520 Apparently,
00:49:32.100 they were all
00:49:32.460 her questions.
00:49:36.780 All right.
00:49:39.660 You made it to
00:49:40.420 the show live
00:49:41.020 just when it's
00:49:41.580 about to end.
00:49:43.540 But good for
00:49:44.240 you.
00:49:46.920 Restore our
00:49:47.580 American Republic.
00:49:50.560 Kensington,
00:49:51.160 Philly,
00:49:51.620 Trank,
00:49:52.100 Live Stream?
00:49:52.760 No, I
00:49:53.120 haven't.
00:49:56.120 Are they
00:49:56.700 live streaming
00:49:57.360 the street
00:49:58.600 people?
00:50:06.780 All right.
00:50:12.360 Speak to
00:50:13.020 Jonathan
00:50:13.460 Turley.
00:50:16.340 He's one of
00:50:17.000 my favorites.
00:50:17.900 Well, I
00:50:18.220 don't do too
00:50:18.700 many interviews
00:50:19.360 on here.
00:50:23.220 All right.
00:50:28.600 I believe
00:50:29.360 all authorities
00:50:30.120 again.
00:50:35.520 Condemning
00:50:35.920 Ryan Hayden.
00:50:36.780 Ontario
00:50:37.720 schools.
00:50:41.940 Report on
00:50:42.620 the real
00:50:42.940 news about
00:50:43.520 impeachment.
00:50:44.880 What's the
00:50:45.460 real news?
00:50:47.760 We talked
00:50:48.420 about Musk
00:50:48.900 at the
00:50:49.160 border.
00:50:52.840 There's a
00:50:53.460 Trank
00:50:53.880 live stream.
00:50:54.940 Is that
00:50:55.200 USA live
00:50:56.220 stream?
00:50:57.680 Wow.
00:50:58.940 That might
00:50:59.560 be one way
00:51:00.200 to get rid
00:51:01.800 of the
00:51:01.960 problem,
00:51:02.400 to live
00:51:02.780 stream it.
00:51:03.260 No, I
00:51:07.220 stopped
00:51:07.500 playing my
00:51:08.020 guitar.
00:51:10.000 Because I
00:51:10.540 didn't want
00:51:10.860 to damage
00:51:11.340 my hands.
00:51:12.700 It was too
00:51:13.180 much hand
00:51:13.580 damage.
00:51:15.940 I might
00:51:16.520 still play
00:51:17.460 with it a
00:51:17.720 little bit.
00:51:18.020 All right.
00:51:19.900 so I've
00:51:22.000 had an
00:51:22.400 interview later
00:51:23.220 today,
00:51:24.060 actually after
00:51:24.660 this,
00:51:25.140 with
00:51:25.360 Megyn Kelly.
00:51:26.600 and I
00:51:29.880 do not
00:51:30.220 know when
00:51:30.860 it will
00:51:31.300 run.
00:51:32.620 So don't
00:51:33.380 ask.
00:51:34.540 But,
00:51:34.820 yep, we
00:51:39.360 talked about
00:51:40.100 Feinstein's
00:51:41.080 passing.
00:51:41.400 And I
00:51:46.320 guess Elon
00:51:47.140 Musk did
00:51:47.700 a spaces
00:51:49.180 event about
00:51:51.420 anti-Semitism
00:51:52.220 on the
00:51:52.880 platform,
00:51:53.760 and he
00:51:54.080 agreed to
00:51:54.800 visit a,
00:51:56.580 I guess,
00:51:59.120 a concentration
00:51:59.620 camp or
00:52:00.240 something.
00:52:01.040 Why is that
00:52:01.880 important?
00:52:04.600 I don't
00:52:05.300 really understand
00:52:05.880 that.
00:52:07.720 I mean,
00:52:08.020 I guess it's
00:52:08.480 a good visual,
00:52:09.880 but why would
00:52:11.020 anybody have
00:52:11.380 to visit a
00:52:12.280 concentration
00:52:12.840 camp to,
00:52:13.660 you know,
00:52:15.960 change their
00:52:16.480 political opinion?
00:52:17.780 I mean,
00:52:18.620 unless you were
00:52:19.840 worried that it
00:52:20.480 doesn't exist,
00:52:22.040 or something
00:52:22.500 like that,
00:52:23.040 and I don't
00:52:23.320 think that's
00:52:23.740 the problem.
00:52:24.640 I feel like
00:52:25.180 that's performance.
00:52:33.020 My active
00:52:34.020 users,
00:52:34.700 what?
00:52:38.540 All right.
00:52:39.180 why does
00:52:42.260 Fetterman look
00:52:42.900 so different
00:52:43.400 lately?
00:52:43.900 It's a good
00:52:44.260 question.
00:52:45.080 Maybe because
00:52:45.780 he's healing.
00:52:46.740 I don't know.
00:52:47.100 Or maybe he
00:52:47.460 lost weight or
00:52:48.100 something.
00:52:48.420 He does look
00:52:48.900 different.
00:52:49.860 He's got that
00:52:50.300 porn mustache.
00:52:54.100 Yeah,
00:52:54.540 people like to
00:52:55.160 say they've
00:52:55.840 been to the
00:52:56.280 border.
00:52:58.100 I guess there's
00:52:58.860 no substitute
00:52:59.700 for going
00:53:00.420 someplace in
00:53:01.080 person.
00:53:02.920 And if you're
00:53:03.440 Elon Musk,
00:53:04.080 you're in a
00:53:04.640 plane a lot.
00:53:05.640 I would hate
00:53:06.180 to spend as
00:53:06.700 much time in
00:53:07.220 an airplane
00:53:07.700 as Elon
00:53:08.300 Musk does.
00:53:10.300 Although he
00:53:10.920 might have
00:53:11.280 fun up in
00:53:11.720 that airplane.
00:53:14.120 One of the
00:53:14.740 Fettermans has
00:53:15.300 a mustache.
00:53:16.440 Wouldn't it
00:53:16.700 be funny if
00:53:17.320 there were two
00:53:17.780 Fettermans and
00:53:18.560 only one of
00:53:19.060 them has a
00:53:19.480 big mustache?
00:53:20.880 And nobody
00:53:21.480 noticed?
00:53:26.300 All right.
00:53:32.940 It looks like
00:53:33.700 we've done
00:53:34.020 everything we
00:53:34.500 need to do
00:53:34.900 here.
00:53:35.120 YouTube,
00:53:36.220 thanks for
00:53:36.560 joining.
00:53:36.920 I'll see
00:53:37.140 you tomorrow.
00:53:37.460 Thank you.