Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2246 Scott Adams： News & Science & Other Things You Shouldn't Believe. Bring Lots Of Coffee

00:00:00.000 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.

00:00:08.380 It's Coffee with Scott Adams, and man, are you lucky to be here now.

00:00:13.380 All you need to take this experience up to galactic levels is a cup or a mug or a glass,

00:00:20.800 a tank or chalice or stye, and a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind,

00:00:24.900 fill it with your favorite liquid. I like coffee.

00:00:27.520 So, join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine today that makes everything better,

00:00:33.800 except my sound, because I knew I was forgetting something.

00:00:40.080 Let's see. Hold on, hold on. 0.86

00:00:44.540 Yes, if I put my microphone on, this will all go better.

00:00:50.620 Now, a minute ago when I said I know I'm forgetting something,

00:00:54.060 you should have said, your microphone, your microphone.

00:00:57.520 But that's better, isn't it?

00:00:59.840 Well, you missed a simultaneous sip, but I think you read my lips and it came out about the same.

00:01:07.040 I should just turn off YouTube, because there's no way it's going to be monetized now.

00:01:14.280 I've got a feeling the first three seconds of you don't hear sound,

00:01:18.080 you just go to the next thing, right?

00:01:20.300 There's like no point in it.

00:01:21.600 Well, anyway, let's talk about the news.

00:01:26.220 I've got a clarification for you.

00:01:29.320 It goes like this.

00:01:30.840 Confidence is a feature, but certainty is a bug.

00:01:34.980 So, confidence is good, and certainty is bad.

00:01:39.340 Does that make sense?

00:01:42.860 Confidence means you'll be okay.

00:01:44.700 One way or another, you'll work it out, you'll figure it out.

00:01:47.160 That's confidence, but certainty is that you know exactly what's true.

00:01:52.020 You don't really know that.

00:01:53.980 You can just be confident that you'll figure it out.

00:01:57.920 All right, I just thought I'd mention that.

00:02:00.460 Brian Romelli reports that now ChatGPT, I guess it's version 5,

00:02:05.780 has a multimodal mode, meaning it can see and talk and hear and stuff.

00:02:12.880 And you can take a picture of a dish, a prepared food dish,

00:02:19.140 and it will tell you the recipe.

00:02:21.200 So you just take a picture of it, and it tells you the recipe.

00:02:23.900 Do you believe that works?

00:02:26.720 No.

00:02:29.460 Do you know what else can take a picture of something

00:02:31.720 and tell you the recipe?

00:02:33.040 Your mom, yeah, your mom can look at it,

00:02:37.960 and she can probably, well, it looks like you got some cheese in there,

00:02:41.340 it looks like some beans, I see a couple of lentils, and some corn.

00:02:45.860 Yeah, I can make that.

00:02:47.920 So, I do not believe that ChatGPT can make a good recipe from a photograph.

00:02:55.700 Nope, I do not believe it.

00:02:57.900 Let me tell you a little story.

00:02:59.200 When I owned a restaurant, I had a friend who made the best doll soup, 0.99

00:03:05.780 D-A-H-L, is it D-A-H-L or D-A-L?

00:03:09.160 I forget.

00:03:10.100 But, you know, an Indian dish.

00:03:13.080 And it was the best thing I've ever tasted in my life to this day.

00:03:19.160 I've never put anything of food nature in my mouth that tasted that good.

00:03:24.860 And so, I said, can you teach my chef how to make it?

00:03:29.820 So, she came over and taught my chef how to make it,

00:03:33.320 and then he made it, and it tasted terrible.

00:03:36.800 And we, you know, double-checked and triple-checked,

00:03:39.200 and all the ingredients were the same.

00:03:41.520 And do you know why it was so different?

00:03:42.980 Because the woman who made it always made it different every time, 1.00

00:03:47.680 and she tasted it as she went.

00:03:49.460 And so, there was not ever really a recipe.

00:03:52.860 It was just somebody who would taste things until it was right and then serve it.

00:03:57.580 That was about it.

00:03:59.000 So, no, this whole idea that you can copy a recipe doesn't work.

00:04:04.840 Also, when I owned a recipe, or I owned a restaurant,

00:04:07.500 I had a favorite dish, so I would tell them to make that dish.

00:04:13.440 Different every time.

00:04:15.240 No two people made it the same.

00:04:16.960 Sometimes it was terrible.

00:04:18.720 Actually, inedible.

00:04:20.440 And other times, the best thing I ever ate.

00:04:22.860 So, no, Chad GPT cannot tell you how to cook anything.

00:04:26.600 Not yet.

00:04:29.540 Poland is starting work on three nuclear reactors.

00:04:34.360 So, Poland is going wild on nuclear power.

00:04:38.980 Why are we not doing this in the United States?

00:04:42.560 Incompetence.

00:04:43.780 Yeah.

00:04:44.260 We presumably have regulations that stop us from doing this,

00:04:47.860 which probably are dated or under-informed.

00:04:51.800 So, we have an incompetence problem in the United States.

00:04:56.040 And if we'd like to be smarter, we should look to Poland. 1.00

00:05:01.220 Which is ruining a lot of old jokes.

00:05:03.260 But, I guess they were inappropriate in the first place.

00:05:07.760 So, Poland doing everything right, I'm told.

00:05:10.920 Good for you, Poland. 1.00

00:05:13.580 All right.

00:05:14.840 Did anybody see an interview, a recent one,

00:05:18.980 that just happened this week,

00:05:20.300 between Lex Friedman and Mark Zuckerberg,

00:05:23.800 in which they do the interview within virtual reality?

00:05:27.820 Now, when I first say that, you say,

00:05:30.320 oh, blah, blah, blah, that's been done before.

00:05:33.320 No, not like this.

00:05:35.740 This is photorealistic.

00:05:38.680 So, the two heads were not their real heads,

00:05:43.180 but every little eye movement, you know,

00:05:46.060 mouth feature as they spoke,

00:05:48.480 all in real time, all synced up,

00:05:50.820 and all perfectly real.

00:05:52.140 And as they were talking to each other,

00:05:55.120 in the virtual world,

00:05:56.560 they could put their virtual heads pretty close together,

00:05:59.060 and it actually feels, like, awkward,

00:06:01.940 because you're too close to another person.

00:06:04.160 So, you actually feel like it's the real person

00:06:06.640 when you're in that mode.

00:06:08.420 Now, the current limitation

00:06:10.160 is that they don't have a cheap, easy way

00:06:14.080 to scan your face.

00:06:16.620 Someday, you'll be able to, presumably,

00:06:18.220 someday you'll be able to hold up your camera

00:06:20.320 and, you know, scan yourself

00:06:21.880 and then create your model for this.

00:06:25.400 But at the moment, I guess it takes hours

00:06:27.080 and special equipment.

00:06:29.340 But, here's the big change.

00:06:34.260 They don't need to send over the Internet

00:06:36.680 the entire video of what you're trying to look like.

00:06:41.580 Instead, they create it once,

00:06:43.900 and then the only thing that they send over the Internet

00:06:45.860 is the changes.

00:06:48.220 Like a numerical representation of the change.

00:06:51.400 So that you can use low bandwidth,

00:06:54.860 relatively low bandwidth,

00:06:56.560 and have a complete photorealistic experience

00:06:59.440 as long as you've scanned both sides.

00:07:03.440 Now, that's pretty awesome.

00:07:06.520 And apparently, it's so intimate

00:07:08.540 that you can imagine, you know,

00:07:12.220 nearly a sexual experience because of it.

00:07:15.040 Probably you could.

00:07:15.760 But, you know, yeah, I don't want to get too detailed,

00:07:18.360 but I'm sure there's a way that

00:07:19.760 you could turn it into almost a full sexual experience.

00:07:24.900 Now, imagine if you wanted to...

00:07:28.640 All right, let me make a prediction.

00:07:30.120 There will be digital prostitution.

00:07:35.500 And by that, I mean people who are maybe not attractive,

00:07:39.460 but they create an avatar, which is.

00:07:42.000 And it's photorealistic.

00:07:43.800 And then maybe the person on the other side 0.66

00:07:45.900 has some physical component, sex toy, 0.92

00:07:49.140 that they can be using at the same time

00:07:51.180 that they think they're with this person.

00:07:52.940 It's going to be pretty intense.

00:07:56.720 So, you know, goodbye reproduction. 0.59

00:08:00.900 So it's going to be better than regular sex, I think.

00:08:04.280 The real test will be if it can activate your oxytocin.

00:08:08.760 So, you know, your oxytocin is the chemical

00:08:11.140 that your body produces when you're hugging people

00:08:14.100 and having intimate contact.

00:08:16.960 As far as I know, it's the only way you can get it.

00:08:19.420 There's nothing else you can do.

00:08:21.680 It's a human-to-human...

00:08:23.960 Maybe your pet can do it a little bit,

00:08:25.680 but it's basically a human-to-human situation.

00:08:29.360 But could this technology be so similar to a human?

00:08:35.340 And it probably is.

00:08:36.540 If you don't want to be close to the other person's face

00:08:38.700 because it feels creepy,

00:08:40.320 probably you're releasing some of those hormones.

00:08:45.280 So maybe it's an oxytocin source.

00:08:47.300 Who knows?

00:08:47.740 All right, I've got a way to tell who's going to be successful.

00:08:54.420 Do you ever look at a young person and say to yourself,

00:08:56.880 is that person going to be successful?

00:08:59.500 Now, if you assume, you know, some minimum level of capability,

00:09:04.060 then the next question is,

00:09:06.020 are they going to use that capability to do anything useful,

00:09:08.800 be successful?

00:09:10.280 Here's the best predictor that I've seen.

00:09:14.040 It's interest in figuring out the mechanism of success.

00:09:20.360 So it's not just, oh, I'll work hard,

00:09:22.680 or I want it really hard, or I have passion or something.

00:09:25.560 But does somebody actually go out of the way to study

00:09:28.420 the actual mechanism, the systems?

00:09:31.820 You know, what do you do?

00:09:32.680 What do successful people do?

00:09:36.280 You know, how do you get from here to there?

00:09:38.060 What's the process?

00:09:39.420 And you can see that right away with little kids.

00:09:43.140 When I was 12 years old,

00:09:45.360 I was already, you know, gobbling up news stories about famous people.

00:09:50.360 Any kind of story about a millionaire,

00:09:53.660 I'd read the whole thing.

00:09:55.000 It's like, oh, how did you get there?

00:09:56.080 Especially if the story was they came from nothing and they made money,

00:09:59.840 I'd read all of that.

00:10:01.680 And then I would also read, you know, books and stuff,

00:10:04.260 as I got a little older,

00:10:05.680 about anybody who would come up with some method for beating the system.

00:10:10.720 And I see that also with my book, Reframe Your Brain.

00:10:16.980 Because Reframe Your Brain is one of those change-your-life kinds of books.

00:10:21.260 And here's what I say about it,

00:10:22.880 and then you tell me if this would tell you who is successful.

00:10:26.860 Imagine you said this to somebody.

00:10:29.260 You said, oh, I've got this book.

00:10:30.840 It's called Reframe Your Brain.

00:10:32.720 And I tweeted this.

00:10:34.340 Many people say this book adds the highest value to your life

00:10:37.480 for the least effort in reading.

00:10:40.760 So it's the least amount of reading,

00:10:42.840 meaning it's a real easy read,

00:10:44.720 for the biggest impact.

00:10:47.100 Now, if somebody told you that,

00:10:49.260 wouldn't you at least want to skim through that book?

00:10:52.880 Now, if you don't,

00:10:54.460 and that doesn't interest you at all,

00:10:56.860 you're probably not somebody who's going to really kill it in life.

00:11:00.260 If somebody hands you something that's like,

00:11:02.160 all right, if you spend like a minute looking at this,

00:11:04.560 your whole life will be better.

00:11:05.900 And if they say no,

00:11:07.520 you can pretty much predict how their life is going to be.

00:11:12.300 Now, they don't have to take it and read it while you're watching.

00:11:14.760 But if they don't at least show a little interest

00:11:18.000 in something that would be a small amount of work for a huge gain,

00:11:23.480 they're probably not going anywhere.

00:11:25.840 So that's a good way to spot successful people.

00:11:30.100 And by the way, the feedback for that book is insane.

00:11:33.840 The number of people.

00:11:35.000 People are saying it saved their lives,

00:11:37.700 like literally,

00:11:39.000 and changed their lives and all kinds of stuff.

00:11:43.120 It's amazing.

00:11:45.040 So Senator Dianne Feinstein has died at the age of 90.

00:11:51.360 And, boy, this is a tough one.

00:11:55.060 It's a tough one.

00:11:56.440 Because we all want to show respect to the family

00:11:59.640 and for the person passing.

00:12:01.360 But it does make you wonder where the line is.

00:12:05.500 Where's the line?

00:12:07.480 What kind of behavior would be so bad

00:12:10.280 that you would not show respect to somebody after they died?

00:12:14.820 I don't know.

00:12:15.320 It's kind of subjective.

00:12:17.100 But people are going to be all over the line on this one.

00:12:21.260 So the real question is,

00:12:22.700 is there any way to make Adam Schiff's eyes

00:12:25.720 bug out more than they were already?

00:12:27.900 And the answer is, yes,

00:12:29.760 the passing of Senator Dianne Feinstein.

00:12:32.240 Because Adam Schiff might be the replacement.

00:12:36.780 Could be.

00:12:37.380 You never know.

00:12:39.880 Or possibly Joe Biden will choose Dianne Feinstein's corpse

00:12:44.360 as his new VP as an upgrade.

00:12:47.140 Possibly.

00:12:48.160 Anything could happen. 1.00

00:12:49.920 Damn it. 1.00

00:12:50.380 I couldn't be respectful. 1.00

00:12:51.560 I couldn't go a minute.

00:12:53.500 Well, I don't think she respected me either,

00:12:55.400 or so, I think we're even.

00:12:57.180 All right.

00:12:59.000 So the leading causes of death

00:13:01.120 for people between the age of 18 and 44

00:13:03.600 used to be automobiles.

00:13:07.180 Yeah.

00:13:07.420 Used to kill the most people between 18 and 44.

00:13:10.000 And now it's suicide and fentanyl,

00:13:14.140 which are very related.

00:13:16.520 Fentanyl and suicide.

00:13:19.620 Yep.

00:13:19.880 So, if El Chapo died,

00:13:26.380 would I have any respect for him?

00:13:28.420 Would I say, whoa, that's El Chapo.

00:13:31.500 He was sending a lot of fentanyl into the United States.

00:13:35.340 But, you know, he's dead now.

00:13:39.180 So I respect him.

00:13:40.640 And I don't want to offend the family.

00:13:42.600 So let's show some respect for El Chapo when he passes.

00:13:45.880 Does that sound right?

00:13:46.720 Not really.

00:13:49.080 No, because you think he was responsible

00:13:50.800 for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans

00:13:54.180 through fentanyl.

00:13:56.280 But suppose you had a politician

00:13:58.040 who was also responsible.

00:14:00.520 In other words,

00:14:01.020 somebody whose job it was to control the border,

00:14:04.020 or at least be one of them,

00:14:05.420 but wasn't doing it

00:14:06.500 and left the border open.

00:14:10.060 Should I feel different about somebody

00:14:11.720 who allowed El Chapo to do it

00:14:13.760 versus how I feel about El Chapo himself?

00:14:16.720 I'll leave that an open question.

00:14:21.640 Well, who's suing Musk today?

00:14:24.320 As you know,

00:14:25.240 the government is weaponizing itself against Elon Musk

00:14:28.380 because he likes free speech.

00:14:31.060 I mean, literally, that's the reason.

00:14:33.260 And now the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

00:14:36.860 is suing Tesla

00:14:38.520 because they're accusing him

00:14:40.460 of violating federal law by tolerating.

00:14:42.500 So they didn't do something that he tolerated, allegedly.

00:14:47.220 Widespread and ongoing racial harassment 0.81

00:14:49.100 of its black employees 0.75

00:14:50.620 and subjecting some of them for retaliation

00:14:55.440 for opposing the harassment.

00:14:57.740 Now, do you suppose that Elon Musk

00:15:02.200 was aware of this and tolerated it?

00:15:04.800 No.

00:15:06.560 No, of course he didn't.

00:15:08.340 He may have been aware of it,

00:15:09.760 but I'm sure he wasn't tolerating it.

00:15:11.480 I don't know what you can do about it exactly all the time.

00:15:14.540 But,

00:15:14.800 so that's the thing.

00:15:17.060 But this is reported by NBC,

00:15:19.360 and I noted the other day

00:15:20.320 that NBC is how the NPCs get programmed.

00:15:24.240 Is that a coincidence

00:15:25.120 that NBC and NPC sound the same?

00:15:29.420 Oh, I saw it on MSNPC.

00:15:32.560 So I think I'm going to call them MSNPC

00:15:34.880 because they're the ones who program the NPCs.

00:15:37.880 Am I wrong?

00:15:39.380 They literally program the NPCs.

00:15:43.240 The people who can't think for themselves. 1.00

00:15:45.120 So MSNPC,

00:15:49.480 try it out.

00:15:50.240 You'll like it.

00:15:52.460 All right.

00:15:55.860 So,

00:15:56.800 what do you do if you're an employer,

00:15:59.380 and if you don't hire diversity,

00:16:03.420 you'll get in trouble,

00:16:04.500 but if you do hire diversity,

00:16:06.200 there's a very high likelihood of getting sued

00:16:08.520 once you've hired them.

00:16:10.900 It's kind of a no-win situation, isn't it?

00:16:13.140 And I'm not saying that there wasn't racial harassment. 0.85

00:16:18.420 I'm not dismissing the charge.

00:16:21.460 If this was happening, it's pretty bad.

00:16:24.180 It should be stopped.

00:16:26.000 But it's a challenge in risk management

00:16:30.520 because you're going to lose either way, really.

00:16:34.540 All right.

00:16:35.020 In other news,

00:16:36.540 researchers at Columbia University

00:16:38.960 and University of Connecticut,

00:16:42.300 there came up a way to make this material

00:16:44.800 that's part glass and part DNA.

00:16:49.380 Part glass and part DNA.

00:16:53.360 And you put them together

00:16:54.840 and you get this super light

00:16:56.360 and super strong material.

00:16:59.520 Huh.

00:17:00.240 What could go wrong

00:17:01.520 if you match glass with DNA?

00:17:04.300 I feel like we're going to create

00:17:06.280 a species of glass people.

00:17:10.000 They'll be made of glass,

00:17:11.440 but super, super dense,

00:17:13.040 what with the DNA.

00:17:14.400 And pretty soon,

00:17:15.260 they'll be advocating for equal rights.

00:17:18.880 So glass people coming.

00:17:21.600 Here's another story about reframing pain.

00:17:24.980 So there's a study in JAMA,

00:17:27.560 J-A-M-A, 1.00

00:17:29.040 network open,

00:17:30.460 that says that a study said

00:17:33.560 that if you tell people

00:17:35.060 that their pain is in their brain,

00:17:37.840 they don't feel so much

00:17:38.980 as if you tell them

00:17:39.700 that it's in their body.

00:17:41.300 That's the short version.

00:17:43.000 If you tell people

00:17:43.780 to reframe their brain,

00:17:45.620 to reframe their pain

00:17:48.220 so that they just think

00:17:51.100 it's a mental experience,

00:17:53.680 then the pain goes away.

00:17:56.860 Now, I actually have that reframe

00:17:58.540 in my book.

00:18:00.460 You wouldn't recognize it,

00:18:01.560 but it's the one about cold.

00:18:03.860 And I tell a story

00:18:04.880 about meeting somebody

00:18:05.700 who reframed the experience

00:18:07.800 of being cold.

00:18:09.460 He was outdoors without a coat.

00:18:11.780 And he said that he had learned,

00:18:13.640 I won't say why,

00:18:15.000 but he had learned to reframe it

00:18:16.460 as just a feeling and not a pain.

00:18:19.680 Because it wasn't really going to kill him.

00:18:21.680 It was like, I don't know,

00:18:22.800 45 degrees or something.

00:18:24.560 He wasn't wearing a coat.

00:18:26.040 So he wasn't going to die.

00:18:27.400 He was just doing a thing

00:18:28.660 and most people

00:18:29.760 would have been super cold.

00:18:31.580 But I said to myself,

00:18:33.000 is that possible?

00:18:34.260 And I'll just tell you

00:18:35.200 what I wrote in the book here

00:18:36.080 for a moment.

00:18:36.900 I said, is it possible

00:18:37.800 that you could just tell your brain

00:18:39.360 that the cold doesn't hurt you anymore?

00:18:42.920 So I thought I'd try it.

00:18:44.860 And the way I did it was

00:18:46.240 I reframed the cold this way.

00:18:49.160 If it's true that getting

00:18:51.340 into a cold plunge

00:18:52.980 is good for you,

00:18:53.960 and I think basically

00:18:55.000 every expert says yes,

00:18:56.620 the cold plunge.

00:18:58.040 And it's also true 0.97

00:18:59.100 that the cryo things

00:19:00.460 where it's like super, super cold

00:19:02.200 is also good for you.

00:19:05.340 Then I tell myself,

00:19:06.900 well, wouldn't it also be

00:19:08.240 at least a little bit good for me

00:19:09.860 simply to be cold?

00:19:12.180 You know, not in a cold plunge,

00:19:13.800 but just to be cold.

00:19:15.300 Wouldn't that also be good for me?

00:19:17.040 And it probably is

00:19:18.800 in some lesser way.

00:19:21.020 But I decided to try it

00:19:22.980 when I was taking my garbage out

00:19:24.200 one day because it was cold

00:19:25.340 and I didn't want to walk back

00:19:26.480 and get a coat.

00:19:27.900 I thought, well,

00:19:28.320 what if I just try this?

00:19:29.880 I'll just say that the feeling

00:19:32.240 that I get from the cold

00:19:33.440 is not pain.

00:19:35.720 It's just a feeling.

00:19:37.660 And it's making me healthier.

00:19:39.800 And I walked out

00:19:40.900 and I took my garbage

00:19:42.880 all the way down,

00:19:43.640 which takes a while.

00:19:44.940 And I didn't feel any pain.

00:19:47.040 I just felt a sensation.

00:19:49.040 And since then,

00:19:49.940 I've done this same trick

00:19:51.260 a number of times.

00:19:53.200 And I'm not sure

00:19:54.700 it would work

00:19:55.120 for the really long term.

00:19:56.940 But for short-term situations

00:19:58.820 where you're just freezing

00:19:59.880 and you've just got to tough it out,

00:20:02.420 I just made it go away.

00:20:04.200 And I couldn't have imagined

00:20:05.740 that was possible,

00:20:06.940 even though I've seen it done

00:20:09.400 with hypnosis.

00:20:11.080 Now, if you're going to ask me

00:20:13.760 how can I reframe my pain away,

00:20:15.820 I don't have an answer for you.

00:20:18.300 Just reframe it like I did.

00:20:20.700 Just say it's in your mind.

00:20:22.800 Just say it's just a sensation.

00:20:25.020 But if that doesn't work,

00:20:26.600 there's not much else to do.

00:20:28.460 It's pretty much

00:20:29.240 it's that or nothing.

00:20:30.720 So give it a try.

00:20:31.940 If there's some time

00:20:32.880 where the pain

00:20:33.680 is not telling you

00:20:34.800 to fix something,

00:20:36.100 which is the purpose of pain,

00:20:38.160 you want to pay attention

00:20:39.420 to your pain

00:20:39.940 if it's telling you

00:20:40.560 to fix something

00:20:41.240 or run away from something.

00:20:42.860 But if it's just going to be there

00:20:44.500 no matter what,

00:20:46.080 you might be able

00:20:46.660 to reframe it.

00:20:48.920 Reframe your brain

00:20:49.780 and just tell yourself

00:20:50.740 it's not pain.

00:20:53.000 It's an artifact of your brain.

00:20:58.240 All right.

00:20:58.840 Well, and this is another way

00:21:00.600 that I think hypnosis

00:21:01.460 is 50 years ahead of science.

00:21:03.960 And you're seeing that a lot lately.

00:21:06.380 Science is just catching up

00:21:08.240 to where hypnosis was

00:21:09.580 50 years ago.

00:21:10.760 That's true, by the way.

00:21:14.020 I guess Matt Gaetz

00:21:15.600 and his friends in Congress

00:21:19.140 were successful

00:21:20.420 in getting the Ukraine funding.

00:21:23.620 At least it's reframed.

00:21:25.060 He said last night's vote

00:21:26.700 marks a major moment

00:21:28.200 in changing the perceptions

00:21:29.480 on how House Republicans

00:21:31.880 view Ukraine.

00:21:33.680 So I guess 101 Republicans

00:21:35.180 voted to send more money

00:21:36.440 to Ukraine.

00:21:37.700 But more than that,

00:21:38.780 117 Republicans voted against.

00:21:42.100 And now he says,

00:21:42.880 Ukraine funding has now lost

00:21:44.200 something called

00:21:44.960 the majority of the majority rule,

00:21:46.780 some kind of rule.

00:21:47.980 And because of the rules,

00:21:49.340 it cannot be brought up again

00:21:50.600 on the floor

00:21:51.220 per the conference rules.

00:21:54.760 So it looks like

00:21:55.800 Matt Gaetz actually

00:21:56.800 made some progress.

00:21:57.720 And it looks like

00:21:58.520 the House actually came through

00:22:00.940 with separate bills.

00:22:02.720 Now that doesn't mean

00:22:03.660 that they're passed.

00:22:04.400 I guess it goes to the House

00:22:05.480 and we'll see what,

00:22:06.440 or it goes to the Senate.

00:22:07.420 We'll see what the Senate does.

00:22:09.220 But this is one of the,

00:22:12.920 I might be wrong,

00:22:14.940 but this might be one of the

00:22:16.860 most positive things

00:22:18.680 that's happened to the country

00:22:20.200 ever.

00:22:23.740 Like, I don't know

00:22:24.600 if this is real yet.

00:22:26.260 You know, I don't know

00:22:26.880 if it's just going to be

00:22:27.520 this one time

00:22:28.360 they had to do

00:22:29.400 what they had to do.

00:22:30.080 But the fact that

00:22:31.760 they were successful

00:22:32.800 in getting this big

00:22:34.280 Frankenstein bill

00:22:35.380 turned into little,

00:22:37.340 smaller ones

00:22:38.160 that you can vote on

00:22:38.960 individually,

00:22:40.500 what if it happens again?

00:22:44.520 Yeah.

00:22:45.320 What if they do it again?

00:22:48.460 This could be gigantic.

00:22:49.900 If this became

00:22:50.840 the new thing that they do,

00:22:52.820 we might actually get

00:22:54.100 fiscal responsibility

00:22:55.660 for the first time.

00:22:56.700 And it was always obvious

00:22:59.040 what had to be done.

00:22:59.980 It was obvious

00:23:00.620 that this had to be done.

00:23:02.100 But now it is.

00:23:03.360 Maybe.

00:23:04.340 So if Matt Gaetz

00:23:05.280 pulled this off,

00:23:07.160 his argument

00:23:08.580 for being president

00:23:09.480 one day is getting

00:23:10.300 a lot stronger.

00:23:11.420 But we'll see

00:23:11.940 if this is permanent.

00:23:13.360 I would wait a little bit

00:23:14.840 on this story

00:23:15.460 to see if it's a trick.

00:23:17.600 Might be a trick.

00:23:19.440 Maybe the Senate

00:23:20.300 will just put them

00:23:20.960 all back together

00:23:21.640 and vote on them.

00:23:22.400 I don't know.

00:23:22.900 I don't know how this works.

00:23:24.020 All right.

00:23:27.240 Here's a good sign

00:23:28.300 of the times.

00:23:29.440 I saw a Larry Elder tweet.

00:23:32.500 And Larry Elder

00:23:33.120 referring to all these

00:23:34.720 smash and grab videos

00:23:35.920 that we keep seeing.

00:23:37.560 And Larry Elder says,

00:23:39.020 when it comes

00:23:39.660 to the smash and grabs,

00:23:41.060 where's the diversity,

00:23:42.440 equity, and inclusion?

00:23:44.000 White folks, 1.00

00:23:44.700 you need to step up.

00:23:47.840 Now, I call that progress.

00:23:49.960 Here's why.

00:23:50.500 If we can't joke 0.95

00:23:53.380 about the dumbassery 0.71

00:23:55.560 on all people's sides, 0.77

00:23:58.800 right?

00:23:59.020 Not on one side,

00:24:00.060 but everybody's side.

00:24:01.080 If we can't joke

00:24:02.700 about race,

00:24:03.780 we'll never fix anything.

00:24:06.240 You've got to be able

00:24:07.100 to joke hard

00:24:08.220 about a topic

00:24:09.680 before you have

00:24:10.560 any hope

00:24:11.380 that you're going to be able

00:24:12.060 to talk honestly about it.

00:24:14.140 So Larry Elder,

00:24:16.420 maybe a signal

00:24:17.480 of positive change.

00:24:21.500 It was just making

00:24:22.380 a joke about it,

00:24:23.600 the racial composition

00:24:26.380 of the smash and grabbers.

00:24:29.180 That's where it needs to be.

00:24:30.240 We need to be able

00:24:30.760 to joke about it.

00:24:32.220 If you don't follow

00:24:33.500 Jeff Charles

00:24:34.380 on the X platform,

00:24:37.020 he's a good follow.

00:24:38.280 And he's doing

00:24:38.860 sort of a funny thing.

00:24:40.060 I think he's still doing it.

00:24:40.980 He did it for a while.

00:24:42.680 In which you would,

00:24:43.880 sort of in response

00:24:45.360 to all the videos

00:24:47.040 that show black use,

00:24:48.740 robbing stores and stuff,

00:24:50.500 I think it was

00:24:51.360 kind of a response.

00:24:52.180 I'm not sure

00:24:52.540 that's how he would put it.

00:24:54.100 But he would show

00:24:55.440 what he called

00:24:56.300 people of whiteness,

00:24:58.880 white people,

00:25:00.460 people of whiteness 1.00

00:25:01.480 doing ridiculously stupid 1.00

00:25:03.380 and dangerous things. 1.00

00:25:04.760 You know, 0.52

00:25:05.340 like a white guy

00:25:06.480 who's opening a gate

00:25:07.440 for a wild bear

00:25:08.320 to walk through

00:25:08.980 and the bear

00:25:10.420 mauls him

00:25:11.120 on the way past.

00:25:12.360 Really,

00:25:12.740 he just,

00:25:13.080 he needed to open

00:25:13.760 the gate.

00:25:14.320 He didn't need

00:25:14.800 to stand next to the gate

00:25:16.000 to let the wild bear

00:25:17.980 walk through.

00:25:18.840 The bear walks through

00:25:19.580 and it just

00:25:19.880 mauls him

00:25:20.720 on the way by.

00:25:22.580 And so,

00:25:23.520 Jeff Charles does,

00:25:24.820 you know,

00:25:25.120 posts,

00:25:25.840 people of whiteness,

00:25:27.520 you know, 0.96

00:25:27.680 stop doing this.

00:25:29.840 Now,

00:25:30.320 that's funny.

00:25:32.380 Because indeed,

00:25:33.440 there are a lot

00:25:34.100 of videos

00:25:34.640 of white people

00:25:35.740 doing things 0.97

00:25:36.340 that are clearly dangerous

00:25:37.480 and ill-advised.

00:25:39.020 So he has an infinite,

00:25:40.640 you know,

00:25:40.960 pool of things

00:25:41.680 to pick from.

00:25:42.660 But if you can't

00:25:43.640 laugh about that,

00:25:45.380 you're not getting

00:25:46.220 any closer

00:25:46.760 to any kind

00:25:47.320 of a solution.

00:25:49.640 All right.

00:25:53.180 Here's another

00:25:54.020 saying I have

00:25:56.340 about certainty.

00:25:59.480 If you see

00:26:00.260 somebody who's certain,

00:26:02.020 they see something

00:26:02.740 in the news

00:26:03.320 that's kind of complicated,

00:26:04.640 and they're certain

00:26:05.620 something is true.

00:26:07.440 For example,

00:26:08.080 they're certain

00:26:08.720 that Joe Biden

00:26:09.480 is guilty of crimes.

00:26:11.120 Or they're certain

00:26:12.080 he isn't.

00:26:13.520 Either way.

00:26:15.200 Certainty is a failure

00:26:16.300 of imagination.

00:26:18.060 It's not something

00:26:19.000 you should be proud of.

00:26:20.620 If you can't imagine

00:26:22.060 how you could be wrong,

00:26:24.820 then your mental capacity 0.96

00:26:27.100 is a little bit stilted.

00:26:29.920 It's a little bit blocked.

00:26:31.880 Right?

00:26:32.880 For the things

00:26:33.880 that I'm, you know,

00:26:35.160 reasonably sure are true,

00:26:37.460 it's because I've run out

00:26:38.920 of imagination.

00:26:40.560 I simply can't imagine

00:26:41.900 an alternative.

00:26:43.680 But there could be.

00:26:45.380 This is why I say

00:26:46.560 that you're in better shape

00:26:47.720 if you've learned magic

00:26:48.920 as a kid.

00:26:50.180 You know, magic tricks.

00:26:52.980 Imagine if you'd never seen

00:26:55.600 how magic tricks are done.

00:26:57.700 The beauty of watching

00:26:58.860 a lot of magic tricks

00:26:59.840 and then later learning

00:27:00.800 how they're done

00:27:01.340 is that you realize

00:27:04.760 your imagination

00:27:05.460 is the problem.

00:27:06.880 You sit there

00:27:07.480 and you watch the magician

00:27:08.320 do a trick

00:27:08.900 and you say to yourself, 0.99

00:27:10.120 damn it, 0.99

00:27:11.200 I cannot imagine 1.00

00:27:12.640 how that could be done.

00:27:14.200 Like, that looks like

00:27:15.040 actual magic.

00:27:15.880 My imagination

00:27:16.480 is just limited.

00:27:17.400 I can't even imagine

00:27:19.320 how that could be done.

00:27:21.280 Now, if you've had

00:27:22.640 that experience

00:27:23.200 with magic tricks,

00:27:25.140 then you can bring that

00:27:26.160 into the real world

00:27:27.080 and when the politician

00:27:29.480 says,

00:27:30.180 this is true,

00:27:31.780 whatever it is,

00:27:32.580 this is true,

00:27:33.740 and you say to yourself,

00:27:35.160 God,

00:27:35.940 I can't even imagine

00:27:37.240 how that would not be true.

00:27:39.180 I mean,

00:27:39.660 there's the video,

00:27:40.680 they showed the proof,

00:27:41.600 here's the data.

00:27:42.680 Yeah, I can't even imagine

00:27:43.780 how that would not be true.

00:27:44.960 That is a failure

00:27:46.880 of imagination.

00:27:48.880 It's not a virtue

00:27:50.200 that you have certainty.

00:27:52.420 You just don't have

00:27:53.600 the imagination

00:27:54.220 for how you could

00:27:55.180 have been fooled.

00:27:56.280 And I would argue

00:27:57.200 that most of the problems

00:27:58.980 in the country

00:27:59.700 are a lack of imagination

00:28:02.020 because that lack

00:28:03.980 of imagination

00:28:04.680 allows you to be fooled

00:28:06.260 with certainty.

00:28:08.840 Being fooled

00:28:09.720 is bad enough,

00:28:10.560 but being fooled

00:28:11.340 and making people think

00:28:12.600 they're sure

00:28:13.360 of what's true

00:28:14.100 when it's the opposite,

00:28:15.960 that's really dangerous.

00:28:17.660 So,

00:28:18.700 Elon Musk learned

00:28:19.840 magic and hypnosis

00:28:21.020 when he was young,

00:28:22.220 according to the biography.

00:28:24.580 Do you think

00:28:24.980 that makes him better 0.99

00:28:25.860 at spotting bullshit? 0.99

00:28:28.560 Probably. 0.99

00:28:30.020 Because he knows

00:28:31.440 that when he sees something,

00:28:34.060 it could not,

00:28:34.860 there's a possibility

00:28:35.740 it's not true,

00:28:37.420 even though he can't imagine

00:28:39.060 how that's possible.

00:28:40.640 You still have

00:28:41.300 the intellectual capacity

00:28:43.400 to say,

00:28:44.000 it could be not true,

00:28:45.040 I just don't know why.

00:28:46.940 Now,

00:28:47.420 this brings us

00:28:47.960 to Neil deGrasse Tyson,

00:28:50.560 who was on

00:28:51.940 Trigonometry podcast

00:28:53.260 recently.

00:28:54.500 He was talking about

00:28:55.400 the rogue experts

00:28:57.000 versus the majority

00:28:58.900 of experts.

00:28:59.860 And he made the point

00:29:01.000 that I've made before

00:29:02.180 that I'm now going

00:29:04.760 to modify.

00:29:05.580 so I would have

00:29:08.000 agreed with him

00:29:08.960 before the pandemic

00:29:10.500 and the opinion,

00:29:12.200 well,

00:29:12.460 and I did,

00:29:13.240 and the opinion

00:29:13.820 goes like this.

00:29:15.420 If there's a rogue expert

00:29:17.580 who's looking at

00:29:19.120 basically the same information

00:29:20.440 as everybody else,

00:29:21.520 but the rogue says,

00:29:23.560 no,

00:29:24.020 no,

00:29:24.360 it's all wrong

00:29:25.080 and the 100,000 experts

00:29:27.440 are all wrong,

00:29:29.360 Neil deGrasse Tyson

00:29:30.560 tells us,

00:29:31.600 and I've told you

00:29:32.320 this before,

00:29:33.360 you could bet

00:29:34.600 on the majority

00:29:35.740 being right

00:29:36.440 and that the rogue

00:29:38.300 is wrong.

00:29:39.300 And the reason is

00:29:40.120 for every,

00:29:41.240 and he says this directly,

00:29:42.820 for every 10,000 rogues

00:29:44.880 who make a claim,

00:29:45.800 oh,

00:29:46.140 the mainstream people

00:29:47.400 are wrong,

00:29:48.540 almost every one of them

00:29:50.000 will in fact

00:29:51.400 be wrong in the end.

00:29:53.620 So if the only thing

00:29:54.920 you knew

00:29:55.360 is that thousands

00:29:56.320 of people

00:29:56.840 were on one side

00:29:57.700 and there was

00:29:58.060 this one rogue person

00:29:59.960 and you had to bet,

00:30:01.360 you had to put

00:30:02.840 your money on it,

00:30:04.180 you should bet

00:30:04.800 against the rogue

00:30:05.920 because your odds

00:30:07.400 are like 10,000 to one,

00:30:09.000 better that the rogue

00:30:10.540 is wrong.

00:30:11.880 Now,

00:30:13.360 that made sense

00:30:14.560 before the pandemic.

00:30:16.580 Well,

00:30:17.160 no,

00:30:17.480 it didn't make sense

00:30:18.120 before the pandemic.

00:30:19.160 It felt like it made sense

00:30:20.660 before the pandemic,

00:30:21.780 very different.

00:30:22.660 It felt like it made sense.

00:30:24.580 After the pandemic,

00:30:26.480 here's what we can know

00:30:27.440 for sure.

00:30:28.640 If there's any money

00:30:30.300 involved in the question,

00:30:32.660 the money will determine

00:30:33.900 how the majority goes,

00:30:36.160 not the data.

00:30:38.420 Everybody agree?

00:30:40.260 If you have a situation

00:30:42.120 where nobody has

00:30:43.200 any money to make

00:30:44.080 and 10,000 people

00:30:46.100 think something's true

00:30:47.060 and one says it's wrong,

00:30:49.000 bet on the 10,000

00:30:50.340 because there's

00:30:51.380 no money involved.

00:30:52.580 They're just telling you

00:30:53.560 what they think is true.

00:30:55.480 Now,

00:30:55.920 that doesn't mean

00:30:56.460 that the rogue

00:30:57.100 will always be wrong,

00:30:58.280 but as

00:30:59.440 Neil deGrasse Tyson

00:31:01.140 accurately points out,

00:31:03.140 with that one time

00:31:03.980 that the rogue

00:31:04.620 gets it right,

00:31:05.740 there's stories

00:31:06.300 and books

00:31:06.840 and it becomes

00:31:08.080 part of our history.

00:31:09.540 But the 10,000

00:31:10.660 who are wrong,

00:31:11.960 you never hear from them

00:31:12.880 again because

00:31:13.320 they were just wrong.

00:31:14.880 So,

00:31:15.300 I would say that

00:31:16.120 if no money

00:31:17.680 is on the line,

00:31:19.180 bet on the majority,

00:31:20.880 which doesn't mean

00:31:21.640 they'll always be right,

00:31:22.800 but it's a smart bet.

00:31:23.660 And if lots of money

00:31:25.740 is involved,

00:31:27.380 all bets are off.

00:31:30.080 Does that sound like

00:31:30.980 a good rule of thumb?

00:31:32.280 And during the pandemic,

00:31:33.620 lots of money

00:31:34.340 was involved,

00:31:35.720 so that made the rogues

00:31:37.880 as credible

00:31:39.220 as the experts,

00:31:40.760 which was exactly

00:31:41.900 zero in both cases.

00:31:44.000 In my opinion,

00:31:45.800 the rogues

00:31:46.340 were worth zero,

00:31:47.480 but also the majority

00:31:49.020 of people

00:31:49.400 were worth zero.

00:31:50.500 So it was two zeros.

00:31:51.420 If you had certainty

00:31:53.500 that the rogues

00:31:55.520 were right,

00:31:56.300 that's a failure

00:31:57.260 of imagination.

00:31:59.220 That's not something

00:31:59.920 you should be proud of.

00:32:04.340 I know.

00:32:05.060 I say that

00:32:05.520 to make people mad

00:32:06.380 because people

00:32:07.260 who got the right answer

00:32:08.380 according to them

00:32:09.920 are pretty sure

00:32:11.240 that it's because

00:32:12.100 they were right

00:32:12.720 and they thought it through.

00:32:14.180 But we don't work that way.

00:32:15.740 That's not the way

00:32:16.340 humans are wired.

00:32:17.740 We are wired

00:32:18.500 to think we were right

00:32:19.400 and we knew it all along

00:32:20.480 once we know

00:32:21.240 the answer.

00:32:22.920 And so we do.

00:32:24.920 All right.

00:32:27.360 So Elon Musk

00:32:28.320 went to Eagle Pass

00:32:29.380 at the border

00:32:29.940 and did some

00:32:31.380 Periscope videos

00:32:33.180 showing how

00:32:34.320 the situation is there.

00:32:35.480 I don't know

00:32:36.040 that we learned anything

00:32:37.020 that we didn't already know.

00:32:39.180 But

00:32:39.600 somehow the news

00:32:42.280 is changed

00:32:43.080 by the fact

00:32:43.740 that Elon Musk

00:32:44.600 went and observed it

00:32:46.000 in person

00:32:46.360 and then talked about it.

00:32:48.760 And it makes me wonder

00:32:50.020 why in the world

00:32:50.920 is he doing it?

00:32:53.880 Why does Elon Musk

00:32:55.080 have to be the person

00:32:55.920 who goes to the border?

00:32:57.500 And I think

00:32:57.900 part of it is

00:32:59.280 he's

00:32:59.640 trying to do marketing

00:33:02.060 for

00:33:02.480 the Periscope

00:33:04.100 live stream.

00:33:05.400 So that's good.

00:33:06.360 Glad he's doing that.

00:33:07.920 And part of it is

00:33:08.900 it's the biggest problem

00:33:10.040 in the country

00:33:10.480 probably

00:33:10.940 or one of them.

00:33:13.040 And it seems

00:33:14.020 to be under-attended.

00:33:15.380 So he's just

00:33:15.920 taking responsibility.

00:33:16.700 That's a very dad

00:33:17.940 thing to do

00:33:18.500 isn't it?

00:33:19.600 It's not his job.

00:33:21.420 It wasn't his job

00:33:22.280 to fix free speech

00:33:23.400 but he felt

00:33:24.440 it needed to be done.

00:33:25.680 It wasn't his job

00:33:26.580 to make

00:33:27.780 people a

00:33:29.420 space-faring

00:33:31.140 civilization

00:33:32.920 but he's doing it.

00:33:36.240 So I love that.

00:33:37.480 I don't know

00:33:37.840 that anything

00:33:38.200 will change

00:33:38.960 but I do like

00:33:40.180 that he's pushing

00:33:41.000 citizen journalism.

00:33:42.220 I signed on

00:33:45.140 to a news site

00:33:45.840 today

00:33:46.180 and I won't

00:33:47.820 name names

00:33:48.480 but it didn't

00:33:49.300 look like

00:33:49.680 they have any

00:33:50.200 reporters anymore.

00:33:51.760 It looked like

00:33:52.620 it was all

00:33:52.960 just press releases.

00:33:54.420 It looked like

00:33:55.220 the news

00:33:55.740 had just stopped.

00:33:56.900 It was the

00:33:57.260 weirdest thing.

00:33:59.060 It was just

00:33:59.740 opinions and

00:34:00.360 press releases.

00:34:02.020 Alright,

00:34:02.780 so maybe we need

00:34:03.560 citizen journalism

00:34:04.460 because otherwise

00:34:05.280 we won't know

00:34:06.040 anything ever.

00:34:08.200 He's right about that.

00:34:12.220 Alright,

00:34:13.840 are you watching

00:34:14.880 the impeachment

00:34:15.580 inquiry?

00:34:17.320 The impeachment

00:34:18.520 inquiry is

00:34:19.800 a little

00:34:20.420 laboratory

00:34:20.900 where you can

00:34:22.360 learn about

00:34:22.980 persuasion

00:34:23.620 and what's

00:34:24.960 wrong with

00:34:25.360 the government

00:34:25.860 and you can

00:34:26.860 see every

00:34:27.700 example of

00:34:28.620 everything.

00:34:30.280 Now,

00:34:30.540 AOC

00:34:30.900 had her

00:34:32.120 moment where

00:34:33.120 she argued

00:34:34.380 passionately

00:34:35.240 against the

00:34:37.760 impeachment inquiry

00:34:38.640 and the thought

00:34:39.600 that Joe Biden

00:34:40.240 had done

00:34:40.580 anything wrong.

00:34:41.400 Oh my God.

00:34:43.760 And I was

00:34:45.040 going to actually

00:34:45.520 play AOC's

00:34:46.700 entire thing

00:34:48.000 because it's a

00:34:49.320 master class

00:34:50.020 in persuasion.

00:34:51.860 So her

00:34:52.620 persuasion game

00:34:53.840 is super strong.

00:34:55.480 So let me tell you

00:34:56.040 a few things

00:34:56.500 she does right.

00:34:57.600 First of all,

00:34:59.160 the whole

00:34:59.900 situation around

00:35:01.140 the Bidens

00:35:01.640 is too complicated

00:35:02.640 for 95%

00:35:05.840 of voters.

00:35:07.360 So 95%

00:35:08.580 of voters

00:35:09.000 will never know

00:35:09.680 what's actually

00:35:10.460 happening.

00:35:11.400 So in that

00:35:12.060 situation,

00:35:12.820 who is the

00:35:13.600 best persuader

00:35:14.440 wins.

00:35:15.360 And they can

00:35:16.040 be completely

00:35:16.620 divorced from

00:35:19.060 reality.

00:35:20.080 They just have

00:35:20.620 to persuade.

00:35:21.540 So given

00:35:21.960 that the public

00:35:22.540 has no idea

00:35:23.460 what really

00:35:24.660 happened with

00:35:25.220 the Biden

00:35:25.560 situation,

00:35:26.920 she says,

00:35:28.640 she first

00:35:30.680 of all,

00:35:31.020 acts very

00:35:31.480 confident.

00:35:33.040 The confidence

00:35:33.640 itself is part

00:35:35.860 of the persuasion.

00:35:36.600 And I watched

00:35:38.180 her ask

00:35:39.360 witness questions

00:35:40.500 and then

00:35:42.160 act as though

00:35:43.100 the answers

00:35:43.840 to the question

00:35:44.700 proved her

00:35:46.000 point when

00:35:47.360 it didn't even

00:35:47.940 come close.

00:35:49.280 But because the

00:35:50.260 people watching it

00:35:51.060 can't tell the

00:35:51.640 difference,

00:35:53.060 she made it look

00:35:53.720 like they proved

00:35:54.560 her point.

00:35:55.040 I'll give you

00:35:55.740 an exaggerated

00:35:56.720 joke version

00:35:58.200 of AOC.

00:35:59.300 All right.

00:36:00.960 Is it true

00:36:01.420 that the sky

00:36:02.000 is blue?

00:36:03.180 Well,

00:36:03.680 now it's

00:36:04.120 actually a

00:36:04.640 little cloudy

00:36:05.180 out today.

00:36:05.960 But is the

00:36:06.520 sky blue

00:36:07.020 in someplace

00:36:07.560 else?

00:36:08.900 Probably,

00:36:09.460 yeah,

00:36:09.620 probably the

00:36:09.980 sky is blue.

00:36:10.720 Right,

00:36:11.320 the sky is

00:36:11.940 blue in

00:36:12.260 someplace else.

00:36:13.200 And did

00:36:13.880 the Republicans

00:36:15.100 once say

00:36:15.780 that it was

00:36:16.740 raining in

00:36:17.660 Nigeria once? 0.82

00:36:20.840 I don't know.

00:36:21.640 Well,

00:36:21.760 they did.

00:36:22.220 They once said

00:36:22.780 it was raining

00:36:23.380 in Nigeria.

00:36:24.880 So,

00:36:25.460 let me get

00:36:25.880 this straight.

00:36:26.600 You're telling

00:36:27.140 us that there

00:36:27.860 are places

00:36:28.320 it's not raining.

00:36:29.040 Is that

00:36:29.400 correct?

00:36:30.700 Yeah.

00:36:31.880 And the

00:36:32.500 Republicans

00:36:33.120 said that it

00:36:34.120 once rained

00:36:34.620 in Nigeria.

00:36:35.320 Is that

00:36:35.560 correct?

00:36:37.480 Probably.

00:36:39.020 All right.

00:36:39.700 And that is

00:36:40.180 why this

00:36:40.580 entire thing

00:36:42.020 is a farce.

00:36:43.180 It's a farce.

00:36:44.600 Can't you

00:36:45.200 see it?

00:36:45.960 It's a farce.

00:36:48.000 So,

00:36:48.640 that's the

00:36:49.120 joke version.

00:36:51.520 But when

00:36:52.280 you watch

00:36:52.700 her asking

00:36:53.180 questions,

00:36:54.220 the assumption

00:36:55.020 that you have

00:36:55.900 is that those

00:36:56.560 questions ever

00:36:57.400 made sense.

00:36:58.100 yes or

00:36:59.140 that the

00:36:59.580 answer is

00:37:01.520 in the

00:37:01.820 right context.

00:37:03.040 It was

00:37:03.520 actually just

00:37:04.280 complete blah,

00:37:05.360 blah,

00:37:05.640 blah that

00:37:06.760 her mannerisms

00:37:08.780 sold as

00:37:10.900 proving a

00:37:11.440 point.

00:37:12.080 It was kind

00:37:12.640 of a genius

00:37:13.180 move.

00:37:14.460 It was

00:37:14.840 really good.

00:37:17.140 There was

00:37:17.660 no connection

00:37:18.440 to facts or

00:37:19.560 process.

00:37:21.240 She just 0.65

00:37:21.700 got somebody

00:37:22.180 to say yes

00:37:22.780 and no

00:37:23.200 and then

00:37:24.180 sold it

00:37:24.800 to the

00:37:25.100 public as

00:37:25.880 though she

00:37:26.180 had just

00:37:26.460 won a

00:37:26.860 case.

00:37:28.380 And none

00:37:28.700 of it was

00:37:29.120 even connected

00:37:29.820 to the

00:37:31.700 question.

00:37:32.180 It was just

00:37:32.520 the most

00:37:32.960 random bunch 1.00

00:37:33.640 of bullshit. 1.00

00:37:35.360 It was 1.00

00:37:35.920 brilliant.

00:37:37.040 Really

00:37:37.240 brilliant.

00:37:39.820 All right.

00:37:41.620 And then

00:37:42.420 the Democrats

00:37:44.600 are also

00:37:45.080 saying this.

00:37:45.800 Is it true

00:37:47.660 that there are

00:37:48.100 no fact

00:37:48.700 witnesses

00:37:49.200 today?

00:37:50.620 Well,

00:37:50.940 yeah,

00:37:51.120 that's true.

00:37:51.840 There we

00:37:52.120 go.

00:37:52.600 No fact

00:37:53.000 witnesses.

00:37:53.720 No fact

00:37:54.080 witnesses.

00:37:55.760 But did

00:37:56.440 that matter?

00:37:58.020 No.

00:37:58.800 The right

00:37:59.360 question was

00:37:59.980 does it

00:38:00.420 matter if

00:38:01.840 there are

00:38:02.080 any fact

00:38:02.600 witnesses

00:38:03.080 here today?

00:38:04.100 And then

00:38:04.420 the answer

00:38:04.780 would have

00:38:05.020 been,

00:38:05.320 well,

00:38:05.500 not for

00:38:05.820 the inquiry.

00:38:07.220 For the

00:38:07.860 inquiry we

00:38:08.500 have documents

00:38:09.540 and we

00:38:10.580 can show

00:38:10.940 you the

00:38:11.200 documents.

00:38:12.400 So the

00:38:12.780 documents serve

00:38:13.740 as the

00:38:14.060 evidence.

00:38:15.060 That's why

00:38:15.520 we're here.

00:38:17.080 Oh,

00:38:17.280 but are there

00:38:17.720 any fact

00:38:18.380 witnesses

00:38:18.780 here?

00:38:19.660 There are

00:38:19.820 no fact

00:38:20.200 witnesses?

00:38:21.700 Are you

00:38:21.980 telling me

00:38:22.240 there are

00:38:22.400 no fact

00:38:22.840 witnesses?

00:38:23.920 Oh,

00:38:24.260 but in

00:38:24.620 another case

00:38:25.220 that had

00:38:26.880 nothing to

00:38:27.340 do with

00:38:27.580 this case

00:38:28.040 and is

00:38:28.700 not a

00:38:29.020 precedent

00:38:29.360 in any

00:38:29.760 way,

00:38:30.020 was there

00:38:30.320 ever a

00:38:30.660 fact

00:38:30.860 witness?

00:38:31.600 Oh,

00:38:31.800 there was.

00:38:32.520 There was.

00:38:33.200 So in

00:38:33.500 the past,

00:38:34.920 there was

00:38:35.260 a fact

00:38:35.640 witness.

00:38:36.320 But let

00:38:36.700 me clarify,

00:38:37.600 there is

00:38:37.840 no fact

00:38:38.340 witness

00:38:38.640 here.

00:38:39.340 None

00:38:39.600 of it

00:38:39.800 matters.

00:38:41.240 It's

00:38:41.620 not

00:38:41.840 relevant

00:38:42.400 to the

00:38:43.900 inquiry.

00:38:45.100 It's

00:38:45.520 just

00:38:45.680 something

00:38:45.980 that sounds

00:38:46.560 good if

00:38:47.560 you didn't

00:38:47.840 know anything

00:38:48.400 about how

00:38:48.880 anything

00:38:49.240 works.

00:38:50.280 But it

00:38:50.900 sounded really

00:38:51.580 good.

00:38:51.920 It was

00:38:52.080 very

00:38:52.320 persuasive.

00:38:55.860 I have a

00:38:56.560 question.

00:38:58.900 Did,

00:39:00.300 is it

00:39:00.820 Senator

00:39:01.320 Raskin,

00:39:02.280 the one who

00:39:02.760 had the,

00:39:03.280 he had the

00:39:04.920 rag on his

00:39:05.500 head because he

00:39:06.220 had some

00:39:06.780 cancer treatments?

00:39:09.060 Jamie

00:39:11.660 Raskin?

00:39:12.720 So now he

00:39:13.600 doesn't have

00:39:14.280 the rag on

00:39:14.820 his head,

00:39:15.660 but he has

00:39:16.560 something closer

00:39:17.220 to a full

00:39:17.800 head of

00:39:18.100 hair?

00:39:20.720 So that

00:39:21.760 would be

00:39:22.020 like,

00:39:22.640 did he

00:39:23.020 get like

00:39:23.640 reverse

00:39:24.140 cancer?

00:39:25.340 The kind

00:39:25.840 that if

00:39:26.280 you take

00:39:26.640 chemo,

00:39:27.140 it adds

00:39:27.420 hair to

00:39:27.720 your head?

00:39:29.060 It doesn't

00:39:29.780 look like a

00:39:30.260 wig because

00:39:30.760 it's not

00:39:31.140 that good.

00:39:33.260 Did he

00:39:33.820 get hair

00:39:34.260 transplants?

00:39:35.960 Did he

00:39:36.240 just get

00:39:36.580 plugs and

00:39:37.160 call the

00:39:37.500 cancer?

00:39:39.060 No,

00:39:40.760 the hair

00:39:41.000 grows back,

00:39:42.080 but it

00:39:42.600 doesn't grow

00:39:43.060 back better

00:39:43.660 than it

00:39:43.980 was before

00:39:44.560 the cancer,

00:39:45.460 before the

00:39:46.540 chemo.

00:39:47.700 You're

00:39:47.940 saying chemo

00:39:48.860 makes his

00:39:49.280 hair grow?

00:39:52.340 It didn't

00:39:52.940 look like a

00:39:53.400 wig.

00:39:54.520 I don't know.

00:39:55.460 Well,

00:39:55.920 I got

00:39:56.300 questions since

00:39:57.340 I don't trust

00:39:57.920 anybody about

00:39:58.600 anything.

00:40:00.600 All right.

00:40:01.980 The House

00:40:02.400 Ways and

00:40:03.040 Means Committee

00:40:04.380 released a

00:40:05.040 document that

00:40:06.940 an IRS

00:40:07.600 agent,

00:40:08.260 relayed an

00:40:10.160 inquiry from

00:40:10.780 the CNN

00:40:11.280 producer.

00:40:12.620 So here's

00:40:13.000 the story.

00:40:13.540 Allegedly,

00:40:14.100 a CNN

00:40:14.500 producer

00:40:15.840 claimed to

00:40:17.520 have an

00:40:17.820 email,

00:40:18.280 when I

00:40:18.600 guess he

00:40:18.920 was trying

00:40:19.760 to get

00:40:20.020 more

00:40:20.200 information

00:40:20.620 from the

00:40:21.040 IRS,

00:40:22.220 but claimed

00:40:22.780 to have

00:40:23.080 an email

00:40:23.560 in which

00:40:24.700 Hunter

00:40:25.220 Biden

00:40:25.580 complained

00:40:28.100 that all

00:40:28.560 of his

00:40:28.820 stuff would

00:40:29.520 go away

00:40:30.000 once his

00:40:30.620 father was

00:40:31.160 elected

00:40:31.460 president.

00:40:32.920 So nobody

00:40:33.720 has found

00:40:34.160 this email.

00:40:34.740 It's only

00:40:35.480 an alleged

00:40:35.960 email.

00:40:37.220 But the

00:40:38.320 implication is

00:40:39.260 that Biden

00:40:39.800 knew that

00:40:40.260 once his

00:40:40.680 father was

00:40:41.440 president,

00:40:42.440 that his

00:40:42.740 legal problems

00:40:43.580 would be

00:40:44.140 no more.

00:40:47.060 Do you

00:40:47.640 think that

00:40:48.060 CNN

00:40:48.360 necessarily

00:40:49.100 had an

00:40:49.700 email,

00:40:50.640 or was

00:40:51.100 the CNN

00:40:51.560 producer

00:40:52.200 lying to

00:40:54.220 get somebody

00:40:55.380 to say

00:40:55.740 something and

00:40:56.300 didn't really

00:40:56.740 have an

00:40:57.020 email?

00:40:58.220 I don't

00:40:58.700 know.

00:40:59.600 I would

00:41:00.060 not trust

00:41:00.760 it.

00:41:01.500 I would

00:41:02.100 not trust

00:41:02.600 it.

00:41:03.520 So everything

00:41:04.000 about this

00:41:04.520 story is

00:41:04.940 sketchy.

00:41:06.780 So I

00:41:07.420 put this

00:41:07.900 in the

00:41:08.540 don't

00:41:08.960 believe

00:41:09.160 anything

00:41:09.420 about

00:41:09.740 it

00:41:09.880 category.

00:41:12.820 All

00:41:13.300 right.

00:41:19.180 That,

00:41:19.860 ladies and 0.98

00:41:20.260 gentlemen,

00:41:21.880 might be

00:41:22.980 just about

00:41:23.400 all I

00:41:23.680 had today.

00:41:24.860 It's a

00:41:25.420 weird kind

00:41:26.240 of day,

00:41:26.620 isn't it,

00:41:26.900 where the

00:41:27.320 news is

00:41:27.840 super

00:41:28.140 complicated?

00:41:28.740 Did you

00:41:30.700 notice that

00:41:31.400 it's a

00:41:32.080 day after

00:41:32.520 the

00:41:32.700 Republican

00:41:33.160 debate and

00:41:33.920 nobody

00:41:34.220 cares?

00:41:36.140 Literally

00:41:36.700 nobody

00:41:37.200 cares.

00:41:39.140 Because

00:41:39.740 none of

00:41:40.500 it

00:41:40.620 mattered.

00:41:41.660 As long

00:41:42.320 as Trump

00:41:42.960 is still

00:41:43.380 in it,

00:41:43.660 none of

00:41:43.880 it mattered.

00:41:46.120 Right.

00:41:47.160 Now I

00:41:47.740 saw,

00:41:48.540 who was

00:41:49.680 it,

00:41:50.880 who's the

00:41:51.400 new,

00:41:51.760 who's the

00:41:56.320 new House

00:41:56.700 Speaker?

00:41:57.060 what's

00:41:58.580 his name?

00:42:00.480 New

00:42:00.960 Speaker?

00:42:01.980 No,

00:42:02.460 the

00:42:02.580 minority

00:42:02.960 speaker.

00:42:06.960 No,

00:42:07.920 the

00:42:08.380 minority.

00:42:11.760 Hakeem

00:42:12.260 Jeffries.

00:42:12.940 And when I

00:42:13.300 say minority,

00:42:14.100 I do not

00:42:14.500 mean that

00:42:14.980 he's a

00:42:15.300 minority.

00:42:16.200 I mean

00:42:16.680 that he's

00:42:17.120 the

00:42:17.300 minority

00:42:17.640 leader.

00:42:19.100 So

00:42:19.220 Hakeem

00:42:19.560 Jeffries

00:42:19.980 was

00:42:24.020 wondering

00:42:24.420 why the

00:42:25.900 Republicans

00:42:26.380 were wasting

00:42:27.060 so much

00:42:27.500 time and

00:42:27.880 money on

00:42:28.320 this

00:42:28.560 impeachment

00:42:29.460 inquiry,

00:42:30.240 in which

00:42:31.120 there are

00:42:31.760 no fact

00:42:32.180 witnesses.

00:42:34.060 So I

00:42:34.840 responded,

00:42:35.620 revenge.

00:42:37.560 It's

00:42:37.780 revenge.

00:42:39.060 I'm not

00:42:39.780 sure it

00:42:40.240 would have

00:42:40.460 happened if

00:42:41.640 Trump had

00:42:42.380 not been

00:42:42.900 impeached

00:42:43.440 twice,

00:42:44.160 or attempted,

00:42:44.800 or whatever

00:42:45.100 happened.

00:42:46.200 And to

00:42:47.440 me it's

00:42:47.720 just payback.

00:42:49.220 And I

00:42:49.980 don't have a

00:42:50.360 problem with

00:42:50.700 that at

00:42:50.960 all.

00:42:51.720 Because that's

00:42:52.620 how karma

00:42:53.320 works.

00:42:54.980 I would

00:42:55.560 say that

00:42:56.100 we've

00:42:56.900 reached the

00:42:57.320 point where

00:42:57.880 all the

00:42:58.320 normal

00:42:58.680 controls are

00:42:59.480 off, and

00:43:01.480 we're into

00:43:02.340 full, you

00:43:04.200 know,

00:43:06.900 guaranteed

00:43:07.640 destruction

00:43:08.320 mode.

00:43:09.120 I think

00:43:09.640 both sides

00:43:10.300 are trying to

00:43:10.940 destroy the

00:43:11.700 other.

00:43:12.600 They're not

00:43:12.980 trying to

00:43:13.360 win a race

00:43:14.020 and have

00:43:14.660 four years

00:43:15.220 of their

00:43:15.480 team in

00:43:15.940 charge.

00:43:17.800 They're

00:43:18.240 trying to

00:43:18.540 put the

00:43:18.760 other side

00:43:19.080 in jail.

00:43:19.940 So I

00:43:20.420 think this

00:43:20.800 will be the

00:43:21.300 first election

00:43:21.940 in which you

00:43:22.480 can guarantee

00:43:23.140 the loser

00:43:23.680 will end

00:43:24.120 up in

00:43:24.380 jail.

00:43:26.280 Would you

00:43:26.820 agree with

00:43:27.140 that?

00:43:27.920 That the

00:43:28.480 loser will

00:43:29.000 end up in 0.99

00:43:29.480 jail,

00:43:30.560 2024 election 0.98

00:43:31.640 loser? 0.65

00:43:35.160 I think 1.00

00:43:35.740 so.

00:43:36.360 I think

00:43:36.780 that's

00:43:37.060 actually a

00:43:37.520 real thing

00:43:37.880 that could 0.68

00:43:38.140 happen.

00:43:39.080 Now,

00:43:40.980 it might

00:43:41.940 be if

00:43:42.260 Trump loses

00:43:42.840 they'll figure

00:43:43.380 they don't

00:43:43.740 have to put

00:43:44.200 him in

00:43:44.440 jail and

00:43:44.800 it would

00:43:45.000 just make

00:43:45.360 everybody

00:43:45.680 angry so

00:43:46.240 it's not

00:43:46.540 worth it.

00:43:47.840 But certainly

00:43:49.200 the risk is

00:43:50.060 totally there.

00:43:52.480 Yeah, and

00:43:54.080 the fact

00:43:54.460 that the

00:43:55.680 fact that

00:43:56.400 the Democrats

00:44:00.120 have come up

00:44:00.740 with MAGA

00:44:01.340 extremists,

00:44:03.360 so they

00:44:03.760 don't, now

00:44:04.880 they're not

00:44:05.280 saying that

00:44:05.740 there's MAGA

00:44:06.340 and that

00:44:06.940 there's some

00:44:07.680 extremists,

00:44:08.720 now they're

00:44:09.440 MAGA

00:44:09.820 extremists.

00:44:11.500 That's

00:44:11.820 dangerous.

00:44:13.140 As soon as

00:44:13.800 you hear

00:44:14.040 there are MAGA

00:44:14.640 extremists

00:44:15.400 and you're

00:44:17.560 associated with

00:44:18.300 them.

00:44:18.420 So, do

00:44:21.420 the math.

00:44:25.080 What would

00:44:25.780 be an

00:44:26.340 appropriate

00:44:26.720 thing that

00:44:27.360 you could

00:44:27.680 do with

00:44:28.220 an

00:44:28.500 extremist?

00:44:30.280 Well, an

00:44:30.940 extremist is

00:44:31.640 probably

00:44:31.920 dangerous.

00:44:33.720 So, you

00:44:34.640 know, the

00:44:35.220 legal system

00:44:36.780 has to deal

00:44:37.340 with extremists.

00:44:38.200 Would you

00:44:38.440 agree?

00:44:39.380 The legal

00:44:40.140 system should

00:44:40.800 deal with

00:44:41.140 extremists

00:44:41.720 because they're

00:44:42.200 dangerous.

00:44:42.780 What about

00:44:45.800 a MAGA

00:44:46.860 extremist?

00:44:48.660 Well, same

00:44:49.560 thing, because

00:44:50.480 if you're an

00:44:50.940 extremist, you're

00:44:51.760 dangerous, whether

00:44:53.040 you have MAGA

00:44:53.800 attached to your

00:44:54.460 name or not.

00:44:55.860 So, now they

00:44:56.440 can take

00:44:56.840 extremists and

00:44:58.240 they can slime

00:44:59.040 the word MAGA

00:44:59.940 with it, and

00:45:01.960 now anybody

00:45:02.800 who's simply

00:45:03.460 MAGA becomes

00:45:05.680 part of the

00:45:06.220 extremist

00:45:06.820 framing.

00:45:08.840 So, basically

00:45:10.020 it's giving

00:45:10.800 permission for

00:45:12.280 violence and

00:45:14.360 legal action

00:45:15.180 against ordinary

00:45:16.660 Republicans.

00:45:18.420 Do you see it

00:45:19.280 that way?

00:45:20.360 If Biden were

00:45:21.300 saying, we

00:45:22.280 don't like the

00:45:22.880 MAGA people, but 0.86

00:45:24.200 we really hate

00:45:24.880 the extremists, I

00:45:26.800 would say, all

00:45:27.420 right, that's

00:45:27.920 fair.

00:45:29.280 That's politically

00:45:30.080 fair.

00:45:30.660 He doesn't like

00:45:31.280 MAGA, and he

00:45:32.240 really thinks

00:45:32.960 something should

00:45:33.460 be done against

00:45:34.020 extremists.

00:45:35.340 Fair.

00:45:36.000 But when he

00:45:36.600 says it's MAGA

00:45:37.700 extremists, it

00:45:39.700 seems to me he's

00:45:40.800 weaponizing the

00:45:41.640 government against

00:45:42.280 ordinary voters

00:45:43.520 who would call

00:45:45.160 themselves MAGA.

00:45:46.860 How else can

00:45:47.880 you see it?

00:45:49.780 I mean, to me

00:45:50.260 it seems a very

00:45:51.120 clear, you know,

00:45:52.880 how Hitler 0.70

00:45:53.540 treated the Jews 0.98

00:45:54.860 kind of situation

00:45:55.740 where you move

00:45:57.420 the country toward

00:45:58.200 that hatred, and

00:45:59.840 maybe you do it a

00:46:01.180 little bit at a

00:46:01.760 time so they

00:46:02.420 don't see it

00:46:02.880 coming.

00:46:03.680 Pretty soon MAGA

00:46:04.700 and extremists will

00:46:06.020 sound like the

00:46:06.580 same thing, right?

00:46:08.180 if you keep

00:46:09.380 saying MAGA

00:46:10.000 extremists, there's

00:46:12.560 only a matter of

00:46:13.160 time before MAGA

00:46:14.120 and extremists

00:46:14.900 sound the same

00:46:15.460 in your head.

00:46:17.920 That's called

00:46:18.840 hypnosis.

00:46:20.860 If I had to

00:46:21.620 guess, the use

00:46:23.660 of MAGA

00:46:24.240 extremists is

00:46:25.180 probably from a

00:46:26.160 hypnotist or

00:46:27.620 somebody who has

00:46:28.460 high-level

00:46:29.680 persuasion skills,

00:46:30.860 because it's a

00:46:31.600 little like their

00:46:32.140 version of dark.

00:46:33.020 You know, it's a

00:46:35.260 little too good

00:46:36.200 for politicians.

00:46:38.120 Politicians would 0.56

00:46:38.960 have just said

00:46:39.500 MAGA and also

00:46:41.620 extremists, as 0.90

00:46:43.180 they always have.

00:46:44.400 But suddenly,

00:46:46.180 suddenly you see

00:46:47.080 this combination

00:46:48.440 of MAGA

00:46:49.120 extremists.

00:46:50.440 That looks like a

00:46:51.640 professional.

00:46:53.820 And that is

00:46:55.120 very weaponized

00:46:56.380 persuasion,

00:46:57.480 weaponized because

00:46:58.360 it could get

00:46:58.880 somebody killed.

00:46:59.440 MAGA is the

00:47:03.580 new Antifa.

00:47:05.540 Well, I think

00:47:06.120 MAGA should 0.92

00:47:06.780 change its name

00:47:07.520 to anti-corruption,

00:47:11.860 which it kind of

00:47:13.660 is.

00:47:14.600 MAGA is kind of

00:47:15.360 anti-corruption,

00:47:16.620 in a way,

00:47:17.680 because MAGA is

00:47:18.440 against corruption

00:47:19.180 of any kind,

00:47:20.900 whether it's

00:47:21.560 wokeness corruption

00:47:22.900 or legal corruption.

00:47:26.240 So yeah, I think

00:47:26.920 that MAGA should

00:47:27.700 just rebrand

00:47:29.440 as anti-corruption

00:47:30.580 because they're

00:47:32.200 going against

00:47:32.920 a guy who's 0.94

00:47:33.360 corrupt.

00:47:35.120 And then anytime

00:47:36.160 somebody says, 0.95

00:47:37.160 hey, I hate you

00:47:38.800 anti-corruption 0.97

00:47:39.600 people, you go,

00:47:40.560 whoa, whoa,

00:47:42.340 look who's in

00:47:42.960 favor of corruption.

00:47:45.160 There's your

00:47:45.800 admission.

00:47:47.300 If you're against

00:47:47.900 the anti-corruption

00:47:48.880 people, well,

00:47:51.580 better watch out.

00:47:54.540 Yeah.

00:47:56.560 All right,

00:47:57.360 ladies and 0.98

00:47:57.780 gentlemen, is there

00:47:58.760 anything else I

00:47:59.300 forgot?

00:48:00.160 Any amazing story

00:48:01.360 that you think

00:48:02.260 bears discussion?

00:48:07.780 Patriots against

00:48:08.560 corruption in

00:48:09.320 America, PACA.

00:48:10.560 I like it.

00:48:12.900 Patriots against

00:48:13.720 corruption in

00:48:14.580 America, except it 0.98

00:48:15.200 sounds like PAC.

00:48:16.400 I don't like the

00:48:17.260 PAC part of it.

00:48:18.120 against making

00:48:26.800 America great.

00:48:27.920 Now it's the

00:48:28.420 again part that

00:48:29.240 they're against.

00:48:33.320 The way to

00:48:34.260 attack MAGA

00:48:35.420 extremists is by

00:48:37.680 getting rid of

00:48:38.420 MAGA.

00:48:38.720 See, I think MAGA

00:48:40.820 was always a

00:48:41.620 gigantic persuasion

00:48:42.860 mistake.

00:48:44.140 It got popular,

00:48:44.880 but it was a

00:48:45.900 giant mistake

00:48:46.600 because it

00:48:47.480 sounds like

00:48:47.900 MAGGOT.

00:48:50.060 If you were to

00:48:51.060 ask me,

00:48:53.620 is MAGA a

00:48:54.880 good acronym?

00:48:56.320 No.

00:48:57.420 It's the

00:48:58.320 worst.

00:49:03.680 Yeah, there's

00:49:04.840 cocaine on

00:49:06.020 everybody's

00:49:06.520 plane.

00:49:06.780 patriots is 0.99

00:49:12.680 evil. 0.99

00:49:14.740 Yeah, you

00:49:15.700 think the

00:49:16.140 left doesn't

00:49:16.580 like the word

00:49:17.000 patriot?

00:49:17.560 That's probably

00:49:17.940 true.

00:49:19.500 Yeah, I saw

00:49:22.760 that Dana

00:49:25.720 Perino talked

00:49:28.020 about her

00:49:28.720 questions.

00:49:31.520 Apparently,

00:49:32.100 they were all

00:49:32.460 her questions.

00:49:36.780 All right.

00:49:39.660 You made it to

00:49:40.420 the show live

00:49:41.020 just when it's

00:49:41.580 about to end.

00:49:43.540 But good for

00:49:44.240 you.

00:49:46.920 Restore our

00:49:47.580 American Republic.

00:49:50.560 Kensington,

00:49:51.160 Philly,

00:49:51.620 Trank,

00:49:52.100 Live Stream?

00:49:52.760 No, I

00:49:53.120 haven't.

00:49:56.120 Are they

00:49:56.700 live streaming

00:49:57.360 the street

00:49:58.600 people?

00:50:06.780 All right.

00:50:12.360 Speak to

00:50:13.020 Jonathan

00:50:13.460 Turley.

00:50:16.340 He's one of

00:50:17.000 my favorites.

00:50:17.900 Well, I

00:50:18.220 don't do too

00:50:18.700 many interviews

00:50:19.360 on here.

00:50:23.220 All right.

00:50:28.600 I believe

00:50:29.360 all authorities

00:50:30.120 again.

00:50:35.520 Condemning

00:50:35.920 Ryan Hayden.

00:50:36.780 Ontario

00:50:37.720 schools.

00:50:41.940 Report on

00:50:42.620 the real

00:50:42.940 news about

00:50:43.520 impeachment.

00:50:44.880 What's the

00:50:45.460 real news?

00:50:47.760 We talked

00:50:48.420 about Musk

00:50:48.900 at the

00:50:49.160 border.

00:50:52.840 There's a

00:50:53.460 Trank

00:50:53.880 live stream.

00:50:54.940 Is that

00:50:55.200 USA live

00:50:56.220 stream?

00:50:57.680 Wow.

00:50:58.940 That might

00:50:59.560 be one way

00:51:00.200 to get rid

00:51:01.800 of the

00:51:01.960 problem,

00:51:02.400 to live

00:51:02.780 stream it.

00:51:03.260 No, I

00:51:07.220 stopped

00:51:07.500 playing my

00:51:08.020 guitar.

00:51:10.000 Because I

00:51:10.540 didn't want

00:51:10.860 to damage

00:51:11.340 my hands.

00:51:12.700 It was too

00:51:13.180 much hand

00:51:13.580 damage.

00:51:15.940 I might

00:51:16.520 still play

00:51:17.460 with it a

00:51:17.720 little bit.

00:51:18.020 All right.

00:51:19.900 so I've

00:51:22.000 had an

00:51:22.400 interview later

00:51:23.220 today,

00:51:24.060 actually after

00:51:24.660 this,

00:51:25.140 with

00:51:25.360 Megyn Kelly.

00:51:26.600 and I

00:51:29.880 do not

00:51:30.220 know when

00:51:30.860 it will

00:51:31.300 run.

00:51:32.620 So don't

00:51:33.380 ask.

00:51:34.540 But,

00:51:34.820 yep, we

00:51:39.360 talked about

00:51:40.100 Feinstein's

00:51:41.080 passing.

00:51:41.400 And I

00:51:46.320 guess Elon

00:51:47.140 Musk did 1.00

00:51:47.700 a spaces

00:51:49.180 event about

00:51:51.420 anti-Semitism

00:51:52.220 on the

00:51:52.880 platform,

00:51:53.760 and he

00:51:54.080 agreed to

00:51:54.800 visit a,

00:51:56.580 I guess,

00:51:59.120 a concentration

00:51:59.620 camp or

00:52:00.240 something.

00:52:01.040 Why is that

00:52:01.880 important?

00:52:04.600 I don't

00:52:05.300 really understand

00:52:05.880 that.

00:52:07.720 I mean,

00:52:08.020 I guess it's

00:52:08.480 a good visual,

00:52:09.880 but why would

00:52:11.020 anybody have

00:52:11.380 to visit a

00:52:12.280 concentration

00:52:12.840 camp to,

00:52:13.660 you know,

00:52:15.960 change their

00:52:16.480 political opinion?

00:52:17.780 I mean,

00:52:18.620 unless you were

00:52:19.840 worried that it

00:52:20.480 doesn't exist,

00:52:22.040 or something

00:52:22.500 like that,

00:52:23.040 and I don't

00:52:23.320 think that's

00:52:23.740 the problem.

00:52:24.640 I feel like

00:52:25.180 that's performance.

00:52:33.020 My active

00:52:34.020 users,

00:52:34.700 what?

00:52:38.540 All right.

00:52:39.180 why does

00:52:42.260 Fetterman look

00:52:42.900 so different

00:52:43.400 lately?

00:52:43.900 It's a good

00:52:44.260 question.

00:52:45.080 Maybe because

00:52:45.780 he's healing.

00:52:46.740 I don't know.

00:52:47.100 Or maybe he

00:52:47.460 lost weight or

00:52:48.100 something.

00:52:48.420 He does look

00:52:48.900 different.

00:52:49.860 He's got that 0.99

00:52:50.300 porn mustache. 0.99

00:52:54.100 Yeah,

00:52:54.540 people like to

00:52:55.160 say they've

00:52:55.840 been to the

00:52:56.280 border.

00:52:58.100 I guess there's

00:52:58.860 no substitute

00:52:59.700 for going

00:53:00.420 someplace in

00:53:01.080 person.

00:53:02.920 And if you're

00:53:03.440 Elon Musk,

00:53:04.080 you're in a

00:53:04.640 plane a lot.

00:53:05.640 I would hate

00:53:06.180 to spend as

00:53:06.700 much time in

00:53:07.220 an airplane

00:53:07.700 as Elon

00:53:08.300 Musk does.

00:53:10.300 Although he

00:53:10.920 might have

00:53:11.280 fun up in

00:53:11.720 that airplane.

00:53:14.120 One of the

00:53:14.740 Fettermans has

00:53:15.300 a mustache.

00:53:16.440 Wouldn't it

00:53:16.700 be funny if

00:53:17.320 there were two

00:53:17.780 Fettermans and

00:53:18.560 only one of

00:53:19.060 them has a

00:53:19.480 big mustache?

00:53:20.880 And nobody

00:53:21.480 noticed?

00:53:26.300 All right.

00:53:32.940 It looks like

00:53:33.700 we've done

00:53:34.020 everything we

00:53:34.500 need to do

00:53:34.900 here.

00:53:35.120 YouTube,

00:53:36.220 thanks for

00:53:36.560 joining.

00:53:36.920 I'll see

00:53:37.140 you tomorrow.

00:53:37.460 Thank you.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - September 29, 2023

Episode 2246 Scott Adams： News & Science & Other Things You Shouldn't Believe. Bring Lots Of Coffee

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript