Real Coffee with Scott Adams - October 03, 2023


Episode 2250 Scott Adams: Lots Of Media Trickery. Also, I'm Halfway Off Of Prisoner Island


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 9 minutes

Words per Minute

145.14961

Word Count

10,019

Sentence Count

712

Misogynist Sentences

26

Hate Speech Sentences

23


Summary

In this episode of Coffee with Scott Adams, I talk about how civilization works, why it works, and why it still works in spite of the fact that most of us are idiots. I also talk about why it's amazing how well society functions, despite people believing a lot of super dumb and fucked up shit.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Do-do-do-do-do-do-do, do-do-do-do-do.
00:00:05.760 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the Highlight of Human Civilization.
00:00:10.800 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and if you'd like to leave,
00:00:14.120 the only way you can do it is by pulling the fire alarm.
00:00:17.100 But if you'd like to stay and elevate your experience to levels
00:00:21.000 that could only be considered infinite or possibly galactic,
00:00:25.060 all you need is a cup or mug or a glass of tank or chalice or stein,
00:00:28.260 I'm a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:31.040 Fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:00:32.580 I like coffee.
00:00:34.460 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure.
00:00:37.060 It's the dopamine, the thing that makes everything better.
00:00:40.400 It's called the simultaneous sip, and it happens now.
00:00:44.480 Go.
00:00:44.700 Go.
00:00:53.000 Well, some of you may have noticed I'm about halfway off Prisoner Island.
00:00:58.260 Uh, so we'll talk about that in a little while, but other fun stuff first.
00:01:05.080 I keep quoting Nate Silver, because he's having some fun conversations about what's real and
00:01:10.580 what isn't real on the X platform.
00:01:12.660 And I think he finally reached his limit, because, you know, he's sort of a, let's say,
00:01:19.800 respectable member of the, you know, the smart people.
00:01:24.780 And he sends this post yesterday.
00:01:27.020 On some level, it's kind of amazing how well society functions, despite people believing
00:01:32.320 a lot of super dumb and fucked up shit.
00:01:37.120 Are you ever amazed by the fact that civilization works at all?
00:01:42.640 And it's just filled with idiots, and it still works?
00:01:45.400 Well, I would say there are two reasons for this.
00:01:50.960 Number one reason is that the economy is a failure engine.
00:01:55.460 So most things that people do in economics fail.
00:02:00.340 They start businesses that don't work.
00:02:02.540 And then businesses that do work are introducing new product lines that fail, mostly.
00:02:08.880 Mostly failing.
00:02:09.700 So we've developed a system that everybody does well if 90% of us fail and 10% of us succeed.
00:02:19.500 And it's enough.
00:02:20.420 Because even when you're failing, you still get a paycheck, you know, most of the time.
00:02:24.660 So failure is actually the, it's almost the operating system of why everything works.
00:02:30.140 It's just full of failure.
00:02:31.060 Which is another way to say that nature rewards action.
00:02:37.200 Nature rewards action.
00:02:39.700 So if you don't know what to do, just do something.
00:02:42.920 So that's probably the best advice you'll ever get.
00:02:45.400 If you don't know what to do, do something.
00:02:48.460 Because nature rewards action and energy.
00:02:52.560 The other thing I would note is that it only takes a few smart people to allow everybody else
00:02:58.460 to live comfortably.
00:02:59.260 So you don't need too many geniuses.
00:03:04.280 The rest of us need to just make sure we don't litter too badly and don't stab too many people.
00:03:10.480 Everything else seems to work out.
00:03:12.800 All right.
00:03:15.180 Meta, the company Meta, which you might think of as Facebook,
00:03:19.000 is floating a plan to charge people, at least in the EU, $14 a month to have an ad-free version of Instagram or Facebook.
00:03:32.160 Now, I don't know if that'll work out, but I would make the following point.
00:03:36.400 Civilization can no longer depend on advertising for your information.
00:03:43.460 If you want your information to be accurate and available to people, it cannot depend on advertising.
00:03:52.440 Because advertisers have a very narrow band of what's allowable, whereas free speech is a wide band by definition.
00:04:00.420 So if you limit all of your speech and truth to, you know, this little narrow band, that's bad news.
00:04:08.900 So anything that gets us away from ad-supported anything is good.
00:04:15.680 So I'm no longer ad-supported.
00:04:18.480 Well, I guess I am in a minor way.
00:04:21.060 On YouTube, I am.
00:04:22.760 So I guess on YouTube, I'm ad-supported.
00:04:25.060 But I believe it's obvious that YouTube is suppressing me.
00:04:28.900 Because my YouTube traffic has stayed largely the same for years.
00:04:35.580 Which is pretty much impossible, I think.
00:04:39.120 Pretty much impossible.
00:04:40.360 Well, everything else has gone up.
00:04:41.740 So, I'll be looking to alternatives for YouTube.
00:04:48.360 But technically, sometimes that's difficult.
00:04:51.900 One of the things I'm thinking of doing is just discontinuing YouTube altogether.
00:04:56.400 And just do it on Rumble.
00:04:58.660 It takes a little more technology to do that.
00:05:01.120 So that's why I've been putting that off.
00:05:03.000 But we'll see.
00:05:04.320 I haven't made any decisions yet.
00:05:05.800 But we have to get away from ad-supported everything.
00:05:07.840 Do you know Mike Benz I keep mentioning?
00:05:11.740 So on the X platform, he's often doing little videos and tweet threads.
00:05:17.660 In which he's exposing the powers that be.
00:05:21.520 Typically, the intelligence operations that were behind the things you see.
00:05:26.720 And I've never had such a clean look into reality.
00:05:31.140 Than I do when I absorb his stuff.
00:05:34.520 But he tweeted this yesterday.
00:05:36.940 Just so you know how dangerous it is.
00:05:40.200 He said, they have to kill me because I'm spilling their secrets.
00:05:44.100 Here's how it'll go.
00:05:45.900 Now, keep in mind, his other predictions have been spookily accurate.
00:05:51.400 And he's predicting his own demise.
00:05:54.360 And he's serious.
00:05:55.280 He says, first, they'll flood with hit pieces on bullshit rhetoric grounds.
00:06:00.640 I think that already started.
00:06:02.220 I think there's already a hit piece about him.
00:06:04.260 At least one.
00:06:05.500 Then they'll flood with lawsuits on bullshit tort grounds.
00:06:09.000 So they'll use lawfare to break him.
00:06:13.700 Then they'll flood with charges on bullshit criminal grounds.
00:06:17.240 And then he says, bookmark this.
00:06:20.240 So he believes he'll be taken out by fake criminal charges.
00:06:26.520 What do you think?
00:06:28.960 I think that's very possible.
00:06:31.860 And I like that he's calling it out in advance so we can watch it as it happens.
00:06:36.560 So we'll see.
00:06:39.860 So that's something that Sarah Fisher put together on the X platform,
00:06:46.100 which was the social media is just destroying normal news.
00:06:51.160 So the clicks that used to come from social media
00:06:53.840 and divert people over to regular news platforms,
00:06:58.140 it just collapsed.
00:07:00.580 So neither the meta platform nor the X platform
00:07:04.840 are sending much of any traffic to the major media.
00:07:09.120 So whereas you might have seen a lot of clicks from social media to CNN,
00:07:14.920 now you see very few.
00:07:18.560 Now, here's like a sign of the times.
00:07:24.040 Every morning, literally every morning, seven days a week,
00:07:27.120 even on holidays,
00:07:28.280 I get up in the morning and I check the news
00:07:30.660 so that I can do a live stream in which I talk about what's happening.
00:07:34.540 A number of times lately, let's say in the last month,
00:07:39.660 I have completely prepared my live stream,
00:07:43.040 you know, notes and notes and notes about the news
00:07:45.180 without ever looking at a news site.
00:07:48.900 Sometimes I don't even leave the X platform
00:07:51.340 because at least there you've got stuff I care about,
00:07:55.460 people know what to send me,
00:07:56.940 you know, I get tagged in things.
00:07:58.320 And usually it's a summary of the news stories,
00:08:01.700 I don't necessarily have to go see the story.
00:08:04.200 I usually do if there's a link,
00:08:05.640 but lots of times I don't have to.
00:08:08.180 And I realize that the news on CNN is all just garbage.
00:08:14.780 And I don't even believe that CNN or Fox
00:08:18.120 are paying anybody to do any reporting anymore.
00:08:21.860 They have writers who are writing things
00:08:25.720 that they see on television.
00:08:28.400 That's what it looks like.
00:08:30.080 So I think that the economic model of the news
00:08:33.280 is so degraded at this point that they can't,
00:08:36.860 it feels like they're pretending to be news
00:08:39.500 without actually being news.
00:08:42.160 So for example, we'll talk about this in a minute.
00:08:44.600 Oh, actually, we'll talk about it next.
00:08:46.620 CNN has a long piece to fill up a lot of real estate
00:08:50.400 on their so-called news page
00:08:51.940 about, I guess Jake Tapper wrote this,
00:08:55.760 and it's an exclusive.
00:08:57.320 John Kelly, so he was the chief of staff
00:09:01.300 under Trump, general.
00:09:04.220 He goes on the record to confirm
00:09:05.700 several disturbing stories about Trump.
00:09:09.520 Now, is that news?
00:09:12.120 It's the opposite of news.
00:09:14.500 It's a story about something
00:09:16.060 that we already heard of years ago
00:09:18.980 and the same person is going to say it again.
00:09:24.040 And that's like a really big part
00:09:25.680 of CNN's entire real estate today.
00:09:30.180 They're going to tell us a story
00:09:31.600 about what a guy thought, one person.
00:09:36.020 Now, do you think that there is new information?
00:09:39.260 Do you think they've got, oh, a document?
00:09:41.660 No, no.
00:09:42.600 It's just the same person
00:09:43.700 and he's got some complaints about Trump.
00:09:46.840 And that's news.
00:09:49.800 That's the news.
00:09:51.700 It didn't used to be like this, right?
00:09:53.960 There's no news value to this at all,
00:09:55.760 but it'll be funny when I tell you
00:09:57.320 what he actually says.
00:09:59.460 So, basically, this is the new
00:10:02.640 worse than Watergate.
00:10:03.620 I think CNN just got so tired
00:10:06.420 of saying everything was worse
00:10:08.420 than Watergate when it wasn't
00:10:09.920 and getting mocked for it,
00:10:12.240 that they needed a new go-to.
00:10:14.800 So, it looks like they're going to use the generals.
00:10:17.620 So, it's going to be all of Trump's ex-generals
00:10:20.560 are going to be the new worse than Watergate.
00:10:23.020 Oh, the thing he said.
00:10:25.040 Oh.
00:10:26.180 Now, here's my take
00:10:28.540 on General Milley
00:10:30.120 and on General Kelly.
00:10:34.260 I swear,
00:10:36.180 this might be pure bias on my part.
00:10:38.560 It might be.
00:10:40.180 But they come off as stupid.
00:10:43.200 Does anybody else have that?
00:10:44.740 I mean, Trump called them stupid
00:10:46.060 and I know I'm being primed by that.
00:10:49.640 So, he's influenced me to, you know,
00:10:51.240 maybe look at him in those terms.
00:10:53.600 But they actually act stupid in public.
00:10:56.840 Like, actually, literally.
00:10:57.880 And I don't say that about people
00:10:59.840 that I disagree with.
00:11:01.640 Yeah, you know, it's not automatic.
00:11:03.440 Like, I don't say that
00:11:04.640 Eric Swalwell is stupid.
00:11:07.300 I don't think he's stupid at all.
00:11:09.860 He does things I don't like.
00:11:12.020 That's completely different.
00:11:13.720 He seems smart.
00:11:15.320 But, honestly, the generals don't seem smart.
00:11:17.940 And I don't know what to think about that.
00:11:19.940 Is that just me?
00:11:21.040 Because it could be me, right?
00:11:22.960 If we're being honest,
00:11:24.640 it could entirely be me.
00:11:26.020 Do you see it, too?
00:11:28.260 Or is it just me?
00:11:31.500 Is anybody having the same vibe?
00:11:34.080 That they don't look smart.
00:11:36.380 Yeah, that's worrisome.
00:11:39.220 But let's see what John Kelly says.
00:11:41.340 And you tell me how credible this sounds.
00:11:43.740 You should use all of your tools
00:11:45.220 that I've taught you
00:11:46.800 about what is a credible report
00:11:48.980 and what isn't.
00:11:50.280 So then I'll quiz you
00:11:51.520 and ask you if this is credible.
00:11:53.440 All right?
00:11:53.660 So it starts out by saying
00:11:56.020 that General Kelly
00:11:57.220 confirmed several remarks
00:11:59.740 his former boss, Trump, made.
00:12:02.280 Now, the story is that
00:12:03.920 he's confirming
00:12:04.840 several things Trump said.
00:12:07.380 What does that mean, confirming?
00:12:10.580 It means he's saying it
00:12:11.900 a second time.
00:12:14.700 If you saw confirming,
00:12:16.280 wouldn't you say to yourself,
00:12:17.160 oh, there's a document
00:12:18.100 that shows it, right?
00:12:20.040 That's what your brain would say.
00:12:21.180 Or there are more people
00:12:22.820 who are backing him up
00:12:23.780 because they were
00:12:24.180 in the same meeting.
00:12:25.840 That would sound like confirmation.
00:12:27.380 Oh, a second person
00:12:28.180 says the same thing.
00:12:31.200 But now listen to the story
00:12:32.760 and see if this sounds like
00:12:33.920 he's confirming anything
00:12:35.120 or just restating
00:12:36.480 what he's already said.
00:12:38.980 All right.
00:12:40.700 Blah, blah, blah.
00:12:41.460 A little bit about him
00:12:42.600 and then it says,
00:12:44.440 all right,
00:12:44.820 so here's what Kelly says
00:12:45.980 about Trump.
00:12:47.260 A person that thinks...
00:12:49.260 Oh, a person that thinks.
00:12:52.640 So now he's going to tell us
00:12:53.960 what Trump thinks
00:12:55.260 and his inner thoughts.
00:12:58.480 He thinks that those
00:12:59.820 who defend the country
00:13:00.640 in uniform
00:13:01.200 or are shot down
00:13:02.720 or seriously wounded
00:13:03.860 in combat
00:13:04.500 or spend years
00:13:05.660 being tortured as POWs
00:13:07.900 are all suckers
00:13:08.820 because there's nothing
00:13:10.080 in it for them.
00:13:11.540 Do you believe that
00:13:12.520 even slightly,
00:13:14.260 even slightly
00:13:15.060 is a good summary
00:13:17.560 of what Trump thinks
00:13:19.480 in his inner thoughts?
00:13:21.740 No.
00:13:22.560 Number one,
00:13:23.160 it's mind reading.
00:13:24.660 Number two,
00:13:25.460 it's a made-up quote.
00:13:27.540 Right?
00:13:27.880 So he's basically
00:13:28.780 inventing something
00:13:30.100 to get mad at.
00:13:31.920 And he actually calls it out
00:13:34.980 as talking that he knows
00:13:36.940 what somebody's thinking.
00:13:38.480 But the other tell is this.
00:13:40.140 This one's always good.
00:13:41.320 that those who defend him...
00:13:47.080 Basically,
00:13:47.920 he uses the word all.
00:13:51.100 So he says that
00:13:52.100 Trump says
00:13:52.740 everybody who served,
00:13:55.220 all of them,
00:13:56.300 are suckers.
00:13:57.700 Does that sound like
00:13:58.540 anything that Trump
00:13:59.300 would say in the real world?
00:14:00.920 That all of the people
00:14:02.060 who served in the military
00:14:03.080 were suckers?
00:14:05.060 It doesn't sound
00:14:06.320 like something
00:14:07.580 he would have said.
00:14:08.820 Very inconsistent.
00:14:09.840 And what is the evidence
00:14:11.800 for this?
00:14:12.600 None is given.
00:14:14.420 It's just a statement.
00:14:16.180 I think he thinks this.
00:14:17.940 Now,
00:14:18.240 there is more evidence,
00:14:20.260 but it's not
00:14:20.880 in this part of it.
00:14:25.300 He also says
00:14:26.360 that Trump
00:14:26.840 was a person
00:14:27.840 that did not want
00:14:28.640 to be seen
00:14:29.140 in the presence
00:14:29.780 of military amputees
00:14:31.200 because, quote,
00:14:32.400 it doesn't look good for me.
00:14:34.680 Do you think
00:14:35.120 that's the right context
00:14:36.640 and exactly
00:14:37.300 what Trump said?
00:14:38.220 because somebody
00:14:40.160 said he said it
00:14:40.880 who doesn't like him?
00:14:42.240 So a disgruntled person
00:14:43.560 said he said something.
00:14:45.480 No,
00:14:45.940 it doesn't even
00:14:46.400 sound slightly true.
00:14:48.260 Here's what I think
00:14:49.220 could be true.
00:14:51.140 I think it could be true
00:14:52.580 that privately
00:14:53.240 he would talk about
00:14:54.660 what was a good photo op.
00:14:56.940 Is it a good photo op
00:14:59.060 to show you
00:15:00.580 next to desperately
00:15:01.600 ill people?
00:15:03.260 Maybe not.
00:15:04.900 Maybe not.
00:15:05.580 Is that something
00:15:07.660 that you could say
00:15:08.440 privately,
00:15:10.120 you know,
00:15:10.420 that it's not
00:15:11.020 making you look good?
00:15:12.860 Yeah,
00:15:13.220 I think that's fair.
00:15:14.780 And it has nothing
00:15:15.460 to do with how much
00:15:16.220 empathy you have
00:15:17.000 for the soldiers.
00:15:19.300 It's purely
00:15:20.000 a visual persuasion
00:15:21.440 statement.
00:15:22.580 Now,
00:15:22.860 I don't think
00:15:23.320 he actually said it.
00:15:24.780 My guess is
00:15:25.440 it never came
00:15:25.980 out of his mouth.
00:15:26.960 But if he did,
00:15:28.020 it's more likely
00:15:28.740 in the context
00:15:29.560 of persuasion
00:15:30.900 and it has nothing
00:15:31.960 to do with
00:15:32.500 respecting
00:15:33.040 or disrespecting
00:15:34.040 anybody.
00:15:35.480 That would be
00:15:36.280 my guess.
00:15:37.040 That would be
00:15:37.860 the obvious context
00:15:39.080 that's left out.
00:15:42.440 A person who
00:15:42.960 demonstrated open
00:15:43.940 contempt for a
00:15:44.980 gold star family.
00:15:46.880 Yeah,
00:15:47.400 one.
00:15:48.540 One gold star
00:15:49.720 family that was
00:15:50.500 attacking him.
00:15:52.200 He displayed
00:15:52.920 contempt for
00:15:54.140 somebody who was
00:15:54.960 attacking him.
00:15:57.280 That's not
00:15:58.100 exactly a problem.
00:16:00.580 Now,
00:16:00.900 doesn't he make
00:16:01.520 this look like
00:16:02.340 some kind
00:16:03.040 of disrespect
00:16:03.620 for all
00:16:04.480 gold star
00:16:05.020 parents?
00:16:06.600 Right?
00:16:07.660 Is there
00:16:08.280 anything that
00:16:08.820 would suggest
00:16:09.300 that Trump
00:16:09.720 has disrespect
00:16:10.400 for all
00:16:11.220 gold star
00:16:11.820 parents?
00:16:12.380 Or just
00:16:12.960 the one
00:16:13.300 that was
00:16:13.580 on stage
00:16:14.320 publicly
00:16:15.240 criticizing him?
00:16:19.420 I don't know.
00:16:20.140 If you're
00:16:20.400 a gold star
00:16:20.860 family and
00:16:21.460 you publicly
00:16:22.020 criticize me,
00:16:22.980 I'll go after
00:16:23.520 you in a
00:16:24.400 heartbeat.
00:16:24.940 It would have
00:16:25.300 nothing to do
00:16:25.880 with any
00:16:26.740 gold star
00:16:27.320 anything.
00:16:27.640 He's also
00:16:31.160 saying that
00:16:31.820 Trump called
00:16:33.280 the people
00:16:34.100 who defended
00:16:34.520 America losers
00:16:35.360 and wouldn't
00:16:36.780 visit their
00:16:37.340 graves in
00:16:37.900 France.
00:16:39.400 None of
00:16:39.820 that sounds
00:16:40.320 true.
00:16:41.720 None of
00:16:42.200 that sounds
00:16:42.660 even slightly
00:16:43.320 true.
00:16:44.720 What is the
00:16:45.300 proof?
00:16:45.980 Is there a
00:16:46.460 document?
00:16:47.280 No.
00:16:47.520 Is there a
00:16:47.900 video?
00:16:48.380 No.
00:16:48.840 Is there
00:16:49.160 another person
00:16:49.860 who is saying
00:16:51.660 it at the
00:16:52.000 same time?
00:16:52.600 Well,
00:16:52.820 we'll see.
00:16:54.420 Several
00:16:54.920 senior staffers
00:16:56.000 told the
00:16:56.440 Atlantic,
00:16:58.520 several
00:16:59.560 senior
00:16:59.980 staffers,
00:17:00.600 you mean
00:17:00.820 anonymous
00:17:01.320 people,
00:17:02.640 told the
00:17:03.080 Atlantic the
00:17:04.040 most lying
00:17:04.860 publication in
00:17:07.200 the world.
00:17:08.240 The Atlantic
00:17:08.740 is the
00:17:09.320 least reliable
00:17:10.480 source on
00:17:12.180 anything Trump.
00:17:13.280 They literally
00:17:13.940 are the
00:17:14.420 primary
00:17:15.220 maker-uppers
00:17:16.120 of bullshit
00:17:16.940 about Trump.
00:17:18.840 So several,
00:17:21.040 how many
00:17:21.420 are several?
00:17:23.100 Three?
00:17:24.920 What are
00:17:25.300 their names?
00:17:25.760 Oh,
00:17:26.120 they're all
00:17:26.400 anonymous.
00:17:27.340 Oh,
00:17:27.880 isn't that
00:17:28.360 convenient?
00:17:29.900 Anonymous
00:17:30.400 people talk
00:17:31.860 to the
00:17:32.280 least credible
00:17:33.380 entity in
00:17:34.200 the world.
00:17:35.480 That's some
00:17:36.620 of the
00:17:36.800 evidence.
00:17:40.000 Trump
00:17:40.600 allegedly
00:17:41.060 said,
00:17:42.500 why should
00:17:43.080 I go to
00:17:43.460 that cemetery?
00:17:44.480 It's filled
00:17:45.120 with losers.
00:17:46.620 Do you
00:17:46.860 think there's
00:17:47.240 any chance
00:17:48.060 he said
00:17:48.420 that?
00:17:49.240 Even
00:17:49.680 privately?
00:17:51.240 No.
00:17:52.300 No.
00:17:52.900 It doesn't
00:17:53.320 even sound
00:17:53.820 like him.
00:17:54.320 If you're
00:17:56.040 going to
00:17:56.140 do a
00:17:56.480 fake
00:17:56.820 quote,
00:17:57.880 you should
00:17:58.320 at least
00:17:58.620 put in
00:17:59.000 the time
00:17:59.400 to make
00:17:59.740 it sound
00:18:00.120 like something
00:18:00.680 he would
00:18:01.060 say.
00:18:01.920 This
00:18:02.140 doesn't
00:18:02.340 even sound
00:18:02.800 like his
00:18:03.180 style of
00:18:03.720 talking,
00:18:04.260 much less
00:18:04.740 his opinion.
00:18:06.760 All right.
00:18:10.080 He was,
00:18:11.400 Kelly also
00:18:12.120 criticized his
00:18:12.940 former boss,
00:18:14.100 saying Trump
00:18:14.780 was not
00:18:15.180 truthful in
00:18:16.000 his political
00:18:16.520 positions.
00:18:17.240 Yeah,
00:18:19.100 that really
00:18:19.500 makes him
00:18:19.920 stand out
00:18:20.660 among
00:18:21.160 presidential
00:18:22.900 candidates.
00:18:24.720 Oh,
00:18:25.020 my goodness.
00:18:26.500 There's
00:18:26.800 somebody who
00:18:27.300 thinks a
00:18:27.880 politician
00:18:28.420 didn't tell
00:18:29.720 the truth.
00:18:31.280 Okay,
00:18:31.760 we've kind of
00:18:32.460 factored that
00:18:33.000 in with all
00:18:33.480 the politicians.
00:18:36.840 And he
00:18:37.780 says,
00:18:38.500 Kelly says
00:18:39.040 that Trump
00:18:39.440 is a person
00:18:40.020 that has no
00:18:40.480 idea what
00:18:40.980 America stands
00:18:41.780 for and has
00:18:42.980 no idea what
00:18:43.780 America is
00:18:44.520 all about.
00:18:45.080 That's the
00:18:47.620 best you
00:18:48.000 can do?
00:18:49.220 That you
00:18:49.800 don't know
00:18:50.160 what America
00:18:50.620 is all
00:18:50.960 about?
00:18:51.820 So you're
00:18:52.420 arguing
00:18:52.760 definitions of
00:18:53.780 America or
00:18:54.880 whose history
00:18:55.560 lesson was
00:18:56.100 better?
00:18:57.080 Doesn't he
00:18:57.600 sound like a
00:18:58.300 desperate,
00:19:00.520 just sort of
00:19:01.180 an asshole?
00:19:02.720 I mean,
00:19:02.980 it just feels
00:19:03.420 like an asshole
00:19:03.960 to me.
00:19:06.680 Then he
00:19:07.300 says that
00:19:07.840 Trump is,
00:19:08.500 quote,
00:19:08.580 a person who
00:19:09.220 admires
00:19:09.660 autocrats and
00:19:10.560 murderous
00:19:10.980 dictators.
00:19:12.400 Does he?
00:19:13.920 Or does he
00:19:14.800 admire them
00:19:15.460 the same
00:19:15.840 way we
00:19:16.220 do?
00:19:17.580 The same
00:19:18.080 way I
00:19:18.420 do?
00:19:19.440 Do I
00:19:19.900 admire Putin
00:19:21.020 when I
00:19:22.400 say that
00:19:22.800 he's very
00:19:23.300 effective at
00:19:25.100 getting what
00:19:25.580 he wants?
00:19:26.780 Is that
00:19:27.120 admiring him?
00:19:28.080 Or is that
00:19:28.380 just a
00:19:28.780 statement,
00:19:29.600 an observed
00:19:30.120 statement of
00:19:30.820 fact?
00:19:32.120 If I also
00:19:32.840 say he's a
00:19:33.560 murderous,
00:19:34.220 evil bastard,
00:19:35.480 but he's
00:19:36.720 really good
00:19:37.260 at getting
00:19:38.000 this country
00:19:38.600 to support
00:19:39.300 him and
00:19:39.720 getting stuff
00:19:40.360 done,
00:19:41.600 would I be
00:19:43.320 then admiring
00:19:44.060 them?
00:19:44.800 No,
00:19:45.360 admiring is
00:19:46.300 an asshole
00:19:47.780 word.
00:19:48.860 It's
00:19:49.160 imagining you're
00:19:51.260 reading his
00:19:52.020 mind and
00:19:53.120 then you're
00:19:53.480 interpreting it
00:19:54.180 in the worst
00:19:54.660 possible way.
00:19:58.040 A person
00:19:58.920 who has
00:19:59.260 nothing but
00:19:59.760 contempt for
00:20:00.640 democratic
00:20:01.260 institutions.
00:20:02.580 Really?
00:20:03.640 Trump has
00:20:04.220 only contempt
00:20:05.080 for democratic
00:20:06.500 institutions.
00:20:07.620 More so than
00:20:08.560 the normal
00:20:08.980 person?
00:20:11.380 Don't you
00:20:12.020 think a little
00:20:12.520 bit of contempt
00:20:13.240 is just about
00:20:14.000 right?
00:20:14.800 If you
00:20:15.300 don't have
00:20:15.720 a little
00:20:16.060 bit of
00:20:16.380 contempt
00:20:16.820 for our
00:20:17.500 democratic
00:20:18.000 institutions,
00:20:19.260 you have
00:20:19.740 not been
00:20:20.140 paying
00:20:20.380 attention.
00:20:21.680 So a
00:20:22.000 little bit
00:20:22.300 of contempt
00:20:22.700 is just
00:20:23.340 about the
00:20:23.720 right amount.
00:20:26.920 And the
00:20:27.560 rule of
00:20:27.960 law.
00:20:28.520 Yeah,
00:20:28.760 he hates
00:20:29.140 laws.
00:20:30.980 And then
00:20:31.600 Kelly says,
00:20:32.360 there's nothing
00:20:32.860 more that can
00:20:33.420 be said.
00:20:34.260 God help
00:20:34.820 us.
00:20:35.060 Now,
00:20:37.780 now just
00:20:38.780 keep in
00:20:39.160 your mind
00:20:39.540 that Jake
00:20:40.060 Tapper
00:20:40.460 decided this
00:20:41.980 was newsworthy
00:20:42.940 enough and
00:20:44.160 he called
00:20:44.540 it confirmation.
00:20:46.100 Where was
00:20:46.500 the confirmation?
00:20:48.340 Was it
00:20:48.820 the several
00:20:50.380 senior staffers
00:20:51.520 who were
00:20:51.880 anonymous who
00:20:52.580 told the
00:20:52.920 Atlantic the
00:20:53.980 least credible
00:20:54.660 publication in
00:20:55.500 the world?
00:20:56.800 So CNN,
00:20:57.840 the second
00:20:58.620 least credible
00:20:59.520 organization in
00:21:00.300 the world,
00:21:00.940 is pointing to
00:21:01.900 the Atlantic's
00:21:02.700 reporting about
00:21:04.000 some anonymous
00:21:04.720 people to
00:21:06.700 confirm.
00:21:07.700 That's their
00:21:08.120 confirmation.
00:21:10.260 If I may end
00:21:11.400 this segment
00:21:11.880 with what I
00:21:12.540 call my
00:21:14.000 only good
00:21:14.640 impression,
00:21:16.060 I call it the
00:21:16.760 Jake Tapper
00:21:17.340 tilt or just
00:21:18.380 the Tapper
00:21:19.040 tilt.
00:21:19.960 It's when you
00:21:20.580 ask a question
00:21:21.240 of somebody that
00:21:21.920 you think is
00:21:22.360 lying and you
00:21:23.140 want them to
00:21:23.640 know with your
00:21:24.040 face and your
00:21:24.940 head tilt and
00:21:25.540 it goes like
00:21:25.960 this while
00:21:29.400 listening.
00:21:30.100 Try it.
00:21:30.920 Try it on the
00:21:31.800 holidays.
00:21:32.320 Next time
00:21:32.680 somebody's
00:21:33.400 explaining to
00:21:34.280 you their
00:21:35.260 political opinion
00:21:36.160 if you don't
00:21:36.660 like it,
00:21:37.360 just look at
00:21:37.940 them and
00:21:38.240 give them
00:21:38.580 the Tapper
00:21:39.040 tilt.
00:21:41.820 Just like
00:21:42.480 that.
00:21:42.980 If you're
00:21:43.360 listening on
00:21:43.900 audio,
00:21:44.960 you're missing
00:21:45.560 one of my
00:21:46.220 best impressions.
00:21:47.700 Oh, it's
00:21:48.120 fantastic.
00:21:49.120 Head is tilted,
00:21:50.440 mouth in a
00:21:50.940 mocking position.
00:21:52.580 It's good
00:21:52.980 stuff.
00:21:53.560 If only you
00:21:54.140 had seen it.
00:21:56.280 All right.
00:22:00.920 So Rasmussen
00:22:01.860 had a poll
00:22:02.360 asking people
00:22:03.020 how likely
00:22:03.620 is it that
00:22:04.180 cheating will
00:22:04.780 affect the
00:22:05.200 outcome of
00:22:05.640 the next
00:22:05.920 presidential
00:22:06.400 election.
00:22:08.020 What would
00:22:08.700 be a number
00:22:09.300 that would
00:22:09.820 represent a
00:22:10.680 healthy country?
00:22:14.140 Like what
00:22:14.800 percentage would
00:22:16.020 you feel,
00:22:16.780 oh, that's
00:22:17.280 about right.
00:22:17.760 I would have
00:22:18.740 said that if
00:22:19.800 24% thought
00:22:24.140 it's likely,
00:22:25.760 or 25%
00:22:26.680 thought it
00:22:27.080 was likely,
00:22:27.960 but if 75%
00:22:29.420 thought, oh,
00:22:30.220 no, the
00:22:30.460 elections are
00:22:31.020 fine, I'd
00:22:32.280 feel like we
00:22:32.820 were pretty
00:22:33.120 safe.
00:22:34.080 Because as I
00:22:34.900 often say,
00:22:35.500 24%, 25%
00:22:37.220 will get every
00:22:38.240 question wrong.
00:22:39.560 But if 75%
00:22:40.940 said, I think
00:22:42.760 everything's fine,
00:22:43.600 I would feel
00:22:44.180 comfortable as
00:22:44.960 well.
00:22:45.520 Probably.
00:22:45.900 But it's the
00:22:47.580 opposite of
00:22:48.040 that.
00:22:49.160 So it's
00:22:49.660 closer to,
00:22:50.760 let's say,
00:22:52.280 the people who
00:22:53.540 think that
00:22:54.020 cheating will
00:22:54.600 affect the
00:22:55.080 outcome, very
00:22:56.740 likely is 30%,
00:22:58.160 somewhat likely
00:22:59.120 is 24%.
00:23:01.280 So if you
00:23:03.100 get 54%
00:23:05.340 think it's
00:23:06.060 somewhat likely
00:23:06.800 or very likely
00:23:07.660 that the
00:23:08.060 election will
00:23:08.540 be affected
00:23:09.740 by cheating.
00:23:12.520 Does that
00:23:13.340 feel like a
00:23:14.460 dangerously high
00:23:15.360 number?
00:23:16.840 And would
00:23:17.440 anybody like
00:23:18.020 to argue
00:23:18.420 with me about
00:23:19.240 whether Trump
00:23:19.880 is persuasive?
00:23:21.640 Do you
00:23:22.320 think that
00:23:22.800 this number
00:23:23.340 would be
00:23:23.680 anywhere near
00:23:24.580 what it is
00:23:25.240 if Trump
00:23:26.280 had simply
00:23:26.780 said, I
00:23:27.340 accept the
00:23:28.000 election as
00:23:28.760 it is?
00:23:30.060 No, this
00:23:30.520 is totally
00:23:31.040 Trump.
00:23:32.060 Trump actually
00:23:34.080 convinced more
00:23:35.740 than half of
00:23:36.580 the country
00:23:37.100 that elections
00:23:38.500 are not
00:23:39.460 credible.
00:23:40.860 Think about
00:23:41.580 that.
00:23:42.900 Trump,
00:23:43.960 right?
00:23:44.140 I mean,
00:23:44.460 other people
00:23:45.040 mimicked him
00:23:45.940 and said the
00:23:46.780 same things,
00:23:47.520 but only
00:23:47.900 because he
00:23:48.420 did.
00:23:49.760 Trump by
00:23:50.400 himself got
00:23:51.440 54% of the
00:23:52.640 public, the
00:23:53.240 voting public,
00:23:54.600 to think that
00:23:55.320 the elections
00:23:55.800 are at least
00:23:56.680 somewhat likely
00:23:57.400 to be crooked.
00:23:59.520 That's pretty
00:24:00.300 remarkable.
00:24:01.360 In terms of
00:24:02.000 persuasion, that
00:24:02.980 is one of the
00:24:04.040 all-time most
00:24:05.600 persuasive things
00:24:06.500 I've ever seen.
00:24:07.880 Can you think of
00:24:08.760 anything more
00:24:09.220 persuasive?
00:24:10.860 I mean, the
00:24:12.060 country had a
00:24:12.720 very solid
00:24:13.340 opinion of
00:24:14.580 how safe
00:24:15.140 elections are.
00:24:16.720 I doubt it
00:24:17.540 had changed
00:24:18.000 much in the
00:24:18.680 years until
00:24:19.480 recently.
00:24:20.280 It probably
00:24:20.620 had a big
00:24:21.040 change recently.
00:24:23.280 Well, do
00:24:24.900 you think this
00:24:25.400 is a bad
00:24:26.320 sign or a
00:24:26.880 good sign?
00:24:27.940 Is it bad
00:24:28.500 news or good
00:24:29.040 news that
00:24:29.580 more than
00:24:30.080 half of the
00:24:30.480 country thinks
00:24:31.120 the election
00:24:31.620 might be
00:24:32.060 sketchy?
00:24:32.480 I think this
00:24:35.900 one's too
00:24:36.300 close to
00:24:36.780 call.
00:24:38.240 It's bad
00:24:39.360 in the sense
00:24:40.060 that we
00:24:41.320 wish that
00:24:42.080 elections were
00:24:43.440 not only good
00:24:44.080 but everybody
00:24:44.540 knew it.
00:24:46.040 So it's bad
00:24:46.620 that way.
00:24:47.820 But it's good
00:24:48.500 in the sense
00:24:49.040 that nothing
00:24:50.640 gets fixed
00:24:51.400 until people
00:24:52.260 admit there's
00:24:53.140 a problem.
00:24:54.600 And at the
00:24:55.340 very least,
00:24:56.880 the elections
00:24:57.420 do not have
00:24:58.180 the fully
00:24:58.780 auditable,
00:24:59.660 transparent nature
00:25:00.560 we all want.
00:25:02.480 So maybe
00:25:03.080 having half
00:25:03.700 of the public
00:25:04.200 doubt that it
00:25:04.860 is even in
00:25:05.500 a real election
00:25:06.240 will get you
00:25:07.480 closer to
00:25:08.080 actually fixing
00:25:09.300 something.
00:25:10.260 I'm going to
00:25:10.860 say again why
00:25:11.680 I think the
00:25:12.240 election is
00:25:13.500 not auditable
00:25:14.300 and that it's
00:25:15.900 done in a
00:25:16.340 fashion that
00:25:17.100 gives us,
00:25:17.740 let's say,
00:25:18.380 less comfort
00:25:18.980 than they
00:25:19.420 could.
00:25:20.400 I think it's
00:25:21.260 intentional and
00:25:22.820 I think it's
00:25:23.220 because both
00:25:23.880 sides cheat.
00:25:25.840 I think that's
00:25:26.740 the whole story.
00:25:28.080 Both sides
00:25:28.680 cheat, so
00:25:30.140 neither side
00:25:30.840 has a really
00:25:31.360 strong incentive
00:25:32.160 to change
00:25:33.240 the whole
00:25:33.640 system in a
00:25:34.440 way that
00:25:34.720 nobody can
00:25:35.240 cheat because
00:25:36.240 they want to
00:25:36.620 keep their
00:25:37.300 district, right?
00:25:38.760 Clearly there
00:25:39.540 are power
00:25:39.960 centers that
00:25:40.640 stay Republican
00:25:41.420 and the
00:25:42.620 Republicans would
00:25:43.300 like to not
00:25:44.620 lose them.
00:25:46.020 So I think
00:25:46.620 we've reached a
00:25:47.200 point where
00:25:47.600 both sides
00:25:48.280 are, and
00:25:49.480 this is just
00:25:49.940 speculation based
00:25:51.160 on observation,
00:25:52.540 that it looks
00:25:53.820 like both sides
00:25:54.700 are going to
00:25:55.060 accept cheating
00:25:55.860 and then compete
00:25:57.520 on the cheating
00:25:58.180 itself to see
00:25:59.920 who can out
00:26:00.380 cheat the other
00:26:00.940 side, and
00:26:01.840 cheating in
00:26:02.320 this sense
00:26:03.080 would include
00:26:03.800 legal stuff,
00:26:05.700 things you
00:26:06.260 didn't see
00:26:06.680 coming but
00:26:07.340 somebody had
00:26:08.120 a clever
00:26:08.840 legal maneuver,
00:26:10.660 totally legal,
00:26:11.720 that changes
00:26:12.480 the outcome.
00:26:13.620 So I think
00:26:13.980 we'll see all
00:26:14.480 the legal and
00:26:15.620 maybe less
00:26:16.360 than legal
00:26:16.820 competition.
00:26:19.200 So it looks
00:26:19.520 like a
00:26:20.020 competition of
00:26:21.100 cheaters at
00:26:21.880 this point.
00:26:23.000 Otherwise I
00:26:23.680 don't know
00:26:24.020 what I'm
00:26:24.300 seeing.
00:26:24.600 I cannot
00:26:27.060 explain why
00:26:27.860 Republicans would
00:26:28.740 not want to
00:26:29.260 fix a system
00:26:29.960 they don't
00:26:30.340 trust.
00:26:31.820 Only one
00:26:32.520 reason.
00:26:33.900 The people who
00:26:34.860 could fix it
00:26:35.540 don't want it
00:26:36.260 fixed.
00:26:37.260 I can think of
00:26:38.280 no other
00:26:38.660 reason.
00:26:39.760 Well, there is
00:26:40.360 no other
00:26:40.720 reason.
00:26:41.960 If you can
00:26:43.540 think of any
00:26:44.260 other reason,
00:26:46.020 then maybe it's
00:26:46.700 a failure of
00:26:47.360 imagination on
00:26:48.160 my part.
00:26:49.240 Because it
00:26:49.580 could be.
00:26:50.420 Lots of times
00:26:51.040 it's just a
00:26:51.560 failure of
00:26:52.000 imagination.
00:26:52.380 I just
00:26:53.200 can't imagine
00:26:53.880 any other
00:26:54.480 explanation.
00:26:55.740 But don't
00:26:56.360 you think
00:26:56.680 somebody would
00:26:57.260 want to tell
00:26:57.900 me what the
00:26:58.340 other explanation
00:26:59.000 is?
00:27:00.620 You feel like
00:27:01.580 Republicans would
00:27:02.660 want to say,
00:27:03.120 you know,
00:27:03.740 we're trying
00:27:04.440 real hard to
00:27:05.240 get these
00:27:05.620 elections to
00:27:06.260 be fair,
00:27:07.140 but those
00:27:07.800 darn Democrats
00:27:08.600 keep stopping
00:27:09.240 us for one
00:27:09.920 reason or
00:27:10.320 another.
00:27:11.040 Wouldn't you
00:27:11.360 like to hear
00:27:11.800 that?
00:27:12.620 To at least
00:27:13.160 know that one
00:27:13.820 side was trying
00:27:14.520 to fix the
00:27:15.920 transparency?
00:27:17.120 But I've
00:27:17.780 never heard
00:27:18.120 anything like
00:27:18.540 that.
00:27:19.520 Nothing even
00:27:20.040 close to that.
00:27:22.380 Not at all.
00:27:23.600 So I have
00:27:24.080 to assume
00:27:24.420 they're both
00:27:24.780 in on it.
00:27:25.320 Otherwise,
00:27:26.140 nothing makes
00:27:26.700 sense.
00:27:29.020 I assume
00:27:29.860 the same
00:27:30.280 about corruption.
00:27:32.640 If it were
00:27:33.540 only true
00:27:34.240 that Bob
00:27:34.980 Menendez
00:27:35.620 is the
00:27:37.060 crooked one,
00:27:39.100 well,
00:27:39.460 I'd be
00:27:39.700 amazed.
00:27:41.300 But if you
00:27:42.320 don't think
00:27:42.840 that Republicans
00:27:43.560 could have
00:27:44.900 known what
00:27:45.440 this guy was
00:27:45.960 doing or
00:27:46.480 that people
00:27:47.060 do this
00:27:47.560 and that
00:27:47.900 job,
00:27:49.460 that's
00:27:49.820 probably
00:27:50.120 because
00:27:50.460 Republicans
00:27:50.980 are doing
00:27:51.420 the same
00:27:51.780 thing in
00:27:52.160 a different
00:27:52.460 way.
00:27:53.760 So again,
00:27:54.740 I would
00:27:54.980 assume that
00:27:55.560 corporate or
00:27:56.760 congressional
00:27:58.080 corruption
00:27:58.960 probably is
00:28:00.540 because they're
00:28:01.060 doing it on
00:28:01.520 both sides.
00:28:02.900 Not every
00:28:03.700 person.
00:28:04.740 Not every
00:28:05.300 person.
00:28:06.300 But it's
00:28:06.600 probably on
00:28:07.020 both sides.
00:28:09.540 All right.
00:28:11.000 There's this
00:28:11.380 new study that
00:28:12.860 says you can
00:28:13.340 make yourself
00:28:13.860 look good in
00:28:14.660 interviews and
00:28:15.720 just look good
00:28:16.520 to other people
00:28:17.060 at work by
00:28:18.300 praising your
00:28:19.960 coworkers.
00:28:20.600 leaders.
00:28:21.620 At the
00:28:21.860 same time,
00:28:22.440 you maybe
00:28:23.140 say good
00:28:23.760 things about
00:28:24.220 yourself.
00:28:25.680 So the
00:28:26.020 research says
00:28:26.820 that instead
00:28:28.280 of saying,
00:28:29.500 I did this
00:28:30.460 and I did
00:28:30.960 that,
00:28:31.720 you say,
00:28:32.340 ah,
00:28:32.600 my coworker,
00:28:33.560 Bob,
00:28:33.980 he's great,
00:28:34.700 he's really
00:28:35.100 killing it,
00:28:36.120 and together
00:28:36.700 with,
00:28:37.180 you know,
00:28:37.900 Alice and
00:28:38.620 Joe and
00:28:39.480 Isaac,
00:28:40.600 you know,
00:28:41.180 and I did
00:28:41.520 my part,
00:28:42.180 I think I
00:28:42.620 did a good
00:28:43.000 part too,
00:28:43.700 but man,
00:28:44.520 we got a
00:28:44.940 good team.
00:28:46.080 Supposedly,
00:28:46.580 that makes
00:28:46.920 you look like
00:28:48.800 the best
00:28:49.220 person you
00:28:49.700 could hire.
00:28:51.040 Now,
00:28:52.400 did you
00:28:52.860 need to
00:28:53.220 do research
00:28:54.040 to know
00:28:54.660 that?
00:28:55.900 Or could
00:28:56.380 you watch
00:28:56.940 every athlete
00:28:58.360 doing an
00:28:59.040 interview ever
00:28:59.780 who had
00:29:00.780 been trained
00:29:01.340 by professionals
00:29:02.140 and had
00:29:02.580 asked?
00:29:03.600 All right,
00:29:04.040 let me give
00:29:05.240 you every
00:29:06.220 athlete.
00:29:09.060 Scott,
00:29:09.780 you scored
00:29:10.640 80 points
00:29:11.280 in the
00:29:11.520 basketball game
00:29:12.180 today.
00:29:12.560 It's the
00:29:12.840 most anybody's
00:29:13.500 ever scored
00:29:14.080 in decades
00:29:15.520 since
00:29:16.060 Will,
00:29:17.120 I guess,
00:29:18.460 anyway,
00:29:19.680 Will Chamberlain
00:29:20.300 or something.
00:29:22.080 And so
00:29:22.740 how do you
00:29:23.200 feel about
00:29:23.580 your great
00:29:24.020 accomplishment?
00:29:26.500 Well,
00:29:27.040 Carl,
00:29:27.840 I like to
00:29:28.900 think it's
00:29:29.200 a team
00:29:29.520 effort.
00:29:30.280 The team
00:29:30.800 played really
00:29:31.300 well.
00:29:31.780 I don't
00:29:32.120 think too
00:29:32.500 much about
00:29:32.900 my personal
00:29:33.880 stats.
00:29:34.400 I was just
00:29:34.780 thinking about
00:29:35.260 getting the
00:29:35.640 win.
00:29:36.420 And if we
00:29:36.820 can get the
00:29:37.240 win,
00:29:37.880 then our
00:29:38.480 team is
00:29:38.900 working as
00:29:40.000 one unit,
00:29:40.820 and that's
00:29:41.180 all I care
00:29:41.520 about.
00:29:41.740 Now,
00:29:44.280 literally
00:29:44.920 everybody has
00:29:45.840 known forever
00:29:46.540 that if that
00:29:47.820 same athlete
00:29:48.540 had said,
00:29:49.540 you know,
00:29:50.220 I did this
00:29:51.280 largely alone.
00:29:53.040 You know,
00:29:53.500 normally I'd
00:29:54.380 expect my
00:29:54.860 teammates to
00:29:55.440 be like
00:29:55.860 kicking in a
00:29:56.500 little bit of
00:29:56.940 scoring,
00:29:57.620 but my
00:29:58.080 God,
00:29:58.480 they were
00:29:58.740 slow today.
00:29:59.800 So I had
00:30:00.260 to take all
00:30:00.840 the scoring
00:30:01.400 upon my
00:30:01.960 own shoulders.
00:30:02.980 I hope
00:30:03.460 they can
00:30:03.780 pick up
00:30:04.120 the pace
00:30:04.480 tomorrow,
00:30:05.100 but what
00:30:05.600 the hell
00:30:06.040 happened to
00:30:06.540 the rest
00:30:06.840 of the team?
00:30:07.700 If I'm
00:30:08.040 scoring 80
00:30:08.660 points,
00:30:09.560 something's
00:30:10.000 wrong with
00:30:10.400 the rest of
00:30:10.800 the team,
00:30:11.200 let me tell
00:30:11.620 you.
00:30:11.740 Right?
00:30:14.280 Doesn't
00:30:14.800 everybody know
00:30:16.040 not to do
00:30:16.600 that?
00:30:18.240 Did we
00:30:18.700 really need
00:30:19.360 to study
00:30:20.020 the people
00:30:21.580 who give
00:30:22.040 credit to
00:30:22.720 those around
00:30:23.300 them?
00:30:24.360 Wait for
00:30:24.900 it.
00:30:25.100 Wait for
00:30:25.460 it.
00:30:25.780 Hold on.
00:30:27.600 This will
00:30:28.280 shock you.
00:30:30.080 Turns out
00:30:30.700 that according
00:30:31.240 to science,
00:30:32.800 the people
00:30:33.260 who are
00:30:33.660 generous to
00:30:34.440 the people
00:30:34.820 around them
00:30:35.660 are more
00:30:37.120 liked by
00:30:38.040 who?
00:30:39.140 Who?
00:30:39.360 the people
00:30:40.400 who are
00:30:40.620 generous to
00:30:41.260 the people
00:30:41.620 around them
00:30:42.420 are more
00:30:43.500 well-liked
00:30:44.220 by the
00:30:45.840 people around
00:30:46.440 them.
00:30:47.840 Yeah.
00:30:48.420 The people
00:30:48.880 around them.
00:30:51.360 So that's
00:30:52.400 quite a
00:30:53.360 shocking
00:30:53.700 thing.
00:30:54.700 they have
00:30:56.700 not studied
00:30:57.320 this,
00:30:57.680 but I have
00:30:58.340 a hypothesis
00:30:59.040 that if you
00:31:00.720 did a
00:31:01.160 control group,
00:31:02.280 one group
00:31:02.840 of people
00:31:03.320 was punching
00:31:04.440 the people
00:31:04.940 around them
00:31:05.520 every time
00:31:06.360 they saw
00:31:06.740 them.
00:31:07.240 Hey,
00:31:07.700 hey,
00:31:07.940 Bob,
00:31:08.380 punch you.
00:31:10.180 That they
00:31:10.760 would be
00:31:11.080 less liked,
00:31:12.720 probably.
00:31:13.440 I mean,
00:31:13.660 you'd have to
00:31:14.080 do the
00:31:14.360 science,
00:31:15.100 but probably
00:31:15.440 less liked
00:31:16.280 than the
00:31:17.140 people who
00:31:17.580 see you,
00:31:18.160 and every
00:31:18.440 time they
00:31:18.780 see you,
00:31:19.760 they give
00:31:20.580 you a
00:31:20.820 compliment.
00:31:21.120 So if
00:31:22.460 you were
00:31:22.660 to compare
00:31:23.140 the two
00:31:23.540 groups,
00:31:24.040 the complimenting
00:31:24.920 everybody versus
00:31:26.100 the punching
00:31:26.720 everybody,
00:31:27.520 I feel like
00:31:28.140 you'd see a
00:31:28.560 difference.
00:31:30.520 Now,
00:31:31.280 don't say
00:31:32.780 I'm some
00:31:33.240 kind of a
00:31:33.700 scientist
00:31:34.040 because I'm
00:31:34.760 not.
00:31:35.840 I just
00:31:36.380 have some
00:31:37.180 theories that
00:31:37.760 I think
00:31:38.000 should be
00:31:38.380 checked out.
00:31:39.760 I think we
00:31:40.160 should do a
00:31:40.520 study on
00:31:40.900 that.
00:31:42.020 Pfizer can
00:31:42.720 fund that.
00:31:44.300 All right.
00:31:46.280 Mr.
00:31:46.800 Beast,
00:31:47.340 who's a
00:31:48.520 beast on
00:31:49.040 social media,
00:31:50.480 I believe
00:31:51.100 his number
00:31:51.600 of followers,
00:31:52.820 Mr.
00:31:53.140 Beast,
00:31:53.540 is one
00:31:54.220 trillion.
00:31:54.900 One
00:31:55.220 trillion people
00:31:55.860 follow him.
00:31:56.440 I don't
00:31:56.620 know,
00:31:56.780 it's a
00:31:57.020 lot.
00:31:57.720 I think
00:31:58.160 he has
00:31:58.400 the most
00:31:58.720 followers.
00:32:00.000 But there's
00:32:00.700 a deep
00:32:01.040 fake scam
00:32:02.200 of him,
00:32:04.060 a little
00:32:04.480 video in
00:32:05.260 which he's
00:32:05.660 scamming
00:32:06.060 people to,
00:32:06.880 I don't know,
00:32:07.600 do something,
00:32:08.720 pay him some
00:32:09.160 money.
00:32:10.200 And he was
00:32:10.980 tweeting around
00:32:11.580 to make sure
00:32:12.120 people knew
00:32:12.540 it was a
00:32:12.880 scam.
00:32:14.040 And he
00:32:14.440 says,
00:32:15.100 this is a
00:32:16.740 serious
00:32:17.060 problem,
00:32:18.720 but is
00:32:19.300 it?
00:32:21.100 Is it?
00:32:22.380 I wonder
00:32:22.960 if the
00:32:23.480 deep
00:32:23.900 fakes are
00:32:24.640 going to
00:32:24.820 be so
00:32:25.200 obvious that
00:32:26.800 everybody will
00:32:27.520 just stop
00:32:27.960 giving money
00:32:28.460 to everybody.
00:32:30.460 Like,
00:32:31.020 I can't
00:32:31.560 imagine seeing
00:32:32.220 a video of
00:32:33.020 somebody saying
00:32:33.700 give me money
00:32:34.380 in any
00:32:34.860 context,
00:32:35.940 unless they
00:32:36.520 were selling
00:32:36.860 me a
00:32:37.120 product and
00:32:37.720 I knew it
00:32:38.060 was an
00:32:38.280 advertisement.
00:32:39.180 But I
00:32:39.720 can't imagine
00:32:40.260 being influenced
00:32:40.980 by a
00:32:42.200 person talking,
00:32:43.620 because I
00:32:43.900 just wouldn't
00:32:44.340 believe that,
00:32:44.860 if they were
00:32:45.140 a real person,
00:32:45.700 I wouldn't
00:32:45.920 believe them.
00:32:46.360 but then the
00:32:47.560 possibility that
00:32:48.320 they're AI,
00:32:49.400 twice as many
00:32:50.220 reasons to
00:32:50.760 not believe
00:32:51.200 them, I
00:32:52.060 think we'll
00:32:52.340 just stop
00:32:52.740 believing
00:32:53.020 everything.
00:32:54.660 I think
00:32:55.020 people will
00:32:55.520 adjust.
00:32:56.820 So instead
00:32:57.240 of being
00:32:57.720 super gullible
00:32:58.820 and we
00:33:00.000 keep falling
00:33:00.540 for this
00:33:00.940 stuff,
00:33:01.380 that'll
00:33:01.620 happen in
00:33:02.020 the short
00:33:02.320 run.
00:33:02.720 In the
00:33:03.140 long run,
00:33:04.380 we'll just
00:33:04.860 not believe
00:33:05.320 anything.
00:33:07.060 I think
00:33:07.680 that's where
00:33:08.020 we're going.
00:33:10.980 That's not a
00:33:11.700 good place to
00:33:12.220 be.
00:33:13.520 Well, you're
00:33:14.300 probably wondering
00:33:14.980 about this
00:33:15.480 story I
00:33:16.180 haven't talked
00:33:16.620 about yet.
00:33:17.560 There was
00:33:17.840 a journalist
00:33:18.520 named Josh
00:33:19.400 Kruger, who
00:33:21.140 was fatally
00:33:21.980 shot seven
00:33:22.840 times early
00:33:23.780 morning, I
00:33:24.920 think it was
00:33:25.160 yesterday, and
00:33:26.680 he was in
00:33:27.500 Philadelphia.
00:33:29.280 Now, the
00:33:30.640 story is
00:33:31.220 notable for a
00:33:32.200 few reasons.
00:33:33.020 One is it
00:33:33.760 was a
00:33:34.060 journalist and
00:33:35.120 an activist
00:33:35.640 and a
00:33:36.840 Democrat type.
00:33:38.500 But also he
00:33:39.800 was quite
00:33:40.200 active on
00:33:41.160 social media,
00:33:42.700 including two
00:33:43.600 days before he
00:33:44.440 was shot to
00:33:45.100 death in
00:33:45.380 his home.
00:33:46.460 He was
00:33:47.000 mocking me
00:33:48.080 on Twitter.
00:33:49.100 I didn't
00:33:49.420 know it.
00:33:50.020 I didn't
00:33:50.240 realize it
00:33:50.680 until after
00:33:51.020 he was
00:33:51.260 already dead.
00:33:52.320 But apparently
00:33:52.780 he had just
00:33:53.520 been mocking
00:33:54.160 me for an
00:33:56.080 old tweet of
00:33:56.920 mine from
00:33:57.300 2020 that I
00:33:58.940 said that if
00:33:59.460 Biden is
00:33:59.920 elected, this
00:34:00.580 was before
00:34:01.020 the last
00:34:02.700 election, I
00:34:03.220 said if
00:34:03.480 Biden is
00:34:03.880 elected, there's
00:34:04.740 a good chance
00:34:05.240 he'll be dead
00:34:05.860 in a year.
00:34:07.180 And he
00:34:07.660 mocked me for
00:34:08.360 saying that and
00:34:10.200 mocked my
00:34:10.980 ability to see
00:34:11.880 the future, and
00:34:13.560 he was slain
00:34:14.960 violently in
00:34:16.040 his home
00:34:16.460 hours later.
00:34:18.960 Now, today's
00:34:20.940 news is that
00:34:22.440 there was
00:34:22.960 another person
00:34:24.020 who had
00:34:24.440 tweeted some
00:34:25.340 trash at me
00:34:26.020 recently who
00:34:27.780 was also
00:34:28.260 stabbed to
00:34:28.860 death at
00:34:29.640 Malcolm X
00:34:30.240 Boulevard, a
00:34:31.680 32-year-old
00:34:32.740 activist who
00:34:34.340 was sort of
00:34:35.100 anti-fossil
00:34:36.000 fuel.
00:34:36.300 So that
00:34:37.620 would be two
00:34:39.040 of my
00:34:39.460 critics who
00:34:41.300 were slain
00:34:43.100 within days
00:34:44.180 of criticizing
00:34:44.800 me, and
00:34:47.000 people are
00:34:47.720 asking, is
00:34:49.300 this some
00:34:49.660 kind of a
00:34:50.120 trend?
00:34:51.200 Do you
00:34:51.540 have alibis?
00:34:52.900 Well, I do
00:34:53.280 have alibis, but
00:34:54.840 no, it's
00:34:55.860 a coincidence.
00:34:57.740 It's a
00:34:58.220 coincidence.
00:34:59.700 Also, there's
00:35:02.000 a report that
00:35:02.780 in Washington,
00:35:03.880 D.C., there
00:35:06.120 was a
00:35:06.400 member of
00:35:06.900 Congress
00:35:07.620 who got
00:35:08.900 carjacked.
00:35:11.320 Yeah.
00:35:12.540 Who was
00:35:12.940 it?
00:35:14.960 Henry
00:35:15.480 Cuellar?
00:35:17.160 So, a
00:35:17.580 Democrat, a
00:35:18.640 member of
00:35:18.980 Congress, who
00:35:19.520 got carjacked
00:35:20.260 in D.C.,
00:35:21.540 which is
00:35:22.880 also a
00:35:24.260 coincidence.
00:35:25.980 Right?
00:35:26.600 Now, I
00:35:27.360 would have
00:35:27.640 said you
00:35:28.940 should get
00:35:29.320 out of
00:35:29.620 D.C.
00:35:30.120 because there's
00:35:30.660 a lot of
00:35:31.000 crime there.
00:35:32.180 But Congress
00:35:33.680 is going to
00:35:34.160 wait around and
00:35:34.800 just keep
00:35:35.360 getting victimized
00:35:36.100 I guess.
00:35:36.720 That would
00:35:37.160 be their
00:35:37.440 choice.
00:35:39.020 So, I
00:35:41.360 would like to
00:35:41.780 report that I'm
00:35:42.720 about halfway
00:35:44.080 off of
00:35:44.640 Prisoner
00:35:45.120 Island.
00:35:46.440 You remember
00:35:47.240 what the
00:35:47.580 middle phase
00:35:48.140 is, right?
00:35:49.380 I'll remind
00:35:50.160 you what
00:35:50.460 Prisoner
00:35:50.900 Island is.
00:35:51.720 Prisoner
00:35:52.080 Island is the
00:35:52.780 story that
00:35:54.560 I hold in
00:35:56.520 my head
00:35:57.020 about, you
00:35:59.480 know, when
00:35:59.740 things get
00:36:00.200 bad, what
00:36:01.480 that's about.
00:36:03.020 So, Prisoner
00:36:03.760 Island is, I
00:36:04.380 imagine that if
00:36:05.140 you drop me on
00:36:05.860 an island full
00:36:06.880 of just
00:36:07.260 prisoners and
00:36:08.300 no law, they
00:36:09.960 would beat me and
00:36:11.120 rape me on the
00:36:11.680 first day and
00:36:12.380 leave me for
00:36:13.020 dead.
00:36:13.940 But I'd
00:36:14.340 probably live.
00:36:15.500 And then the
00:36:15.880 next day they'd
00:36:16.440 do the same
00:36:16.900 thing and beat
00:36:17.720 me and rape me.
00:36:19.320 But if you came
00:36:19.960 back in a year,
00:36:22.200 they would all be
00:36:22.980 dead and I would
00:36:23.820 be, everyone who
00:36:24.780 touched me would
00:36:25.340 be dead, and I
00:36:26.040 would be the king
00:36:26.600 of Prisoner
00:36:27.140 Island.
00:36:27.400 because I
00:36:29.760 don't like to
00:36:30.180 lose.
00:36:32.640 So, that's
00:36:33.780 just a story I
00:36:34.920 tell myself.
00:36:36.980 So, when I got
00:36:37.720 canceled, it did
00:36:39.260 look like I'd
00:36:40.080 been dropped on
00:36:40.680 Prisoner
00:36:41.200 Island.
00:36:42.640 But if you
00:36:43.780 were worried
00:36:44.260 about me, you
00:36:46.520 should pay
00:36:47.160 attention to the
00:36:47.800 news.
00:36:48.680 Because the
00:36:49.320 news is just
00:36:49.960 one story after
00:36:50.860 another confirming
00:36:53.540 that we have a
00:36:55.700 dangerous situation,
00:36:57.400 and that it's
00:36:58.080 being made more
00:36:58.860 dangerous every
00:36:59.540 day by Democrats
00:37:01.740 poisoning the
00:37:03.320 racial relations
00:37:04.500 and not handling
00:37:05.900 crime.
00:37:07.420 And that as
00:37:09.120 Democrat bodies
00:37:10.200 start to fall,
00:37:12.440 all of them
00:37:13.200 tragedies, not
00:37:14.000 making fun of
00:37:14.640 anybody's death,
00:37:15.820 it will start to
00:37:17.180 create a pattern
00:37:17.860 which will suggest
00:37:19.600 that there was
00:37:21.480 something wrong,
00:37:22.340 and maybe I had
00:37:23.160 a point, which
00:37:24.500 had nothing to do
00:37:25.260 with anybody's
00:37:25.820 DNA, not
00:37:27.380 nothing I said,
00:37:28.460 nothing to do
00:37:29.120 with anybody's
00:37:29.620 culture.
00:37:30.740 It has everything
00:37:31.700 to do with the
00:37:32.320 fact that we've
00:37:32.880 been trained that
00:37:34.260 one group of
00:37:35.120 Americans are the
00:37:37.120 oppressors, and
00:37:39.220 they have your
00:37:39.740 stuff, and you
00:37:40.460 should go get it
00:37:41.060 back.
00:37:42.060 And if you happen
00:37:42.740 to be in that
00:37:43.280 group that has
00:37:43.980 been labeled the
00:37:45.360 group that
00:37:45.940 oppressed you who
00:37:46.740 has your stuff,
00:37:47.920 and you need to
00:37:48.560 get it back, you
00:37:51.060 should be very
00:37:51.600 cautious about that.
00:37:52.520 All right, let's
00:37:55.640 talk about Letitia
00:37:57.180 James, or maybe
00:37:58.220 Letitia.
00:37:59.700 Does anybody know
00:38:00.560 how to pronounce
00:38:01.220 her name?
00:38:02.760 I've heard it,
00:38:04.060 people just say it
00:38:04.940 quickly because
00:38:05.540 they're not sure.
00:38:06.600 Letitia, Letitia.
00:38:09.060 I think it's sort
00:38:10.520 of a, you know,
00:38:12.300 everybody just does
00:38:13.060 it the way they
00:38:13.520 want.
00:38:14.740 Letitia.
00:38:16.660 Letitia.
00:38:17.220 Letitia.
00:38:18.420 It's exactly how
00:38:19.460 it's spelled.
00:38:21.200 All right.
00:38:22.000 Well, I'm going to
00:38:22.740 pronounce it any way
00:38:23.440 I want.
00:38:24.440 So I saw a tweet
00:38:25.300 by Kaneko of the
00:38:26.240 Great, showed a
00:38:26.920 video from 2018
00:38:28.280 of Letitia James
00:38:30.780 vowing to use the
00:38:34.800 law to get Trump.
00:38:36.660 Now, if you hear
00:38:37.720 it, it's very clear
00:38:39.060 that she is a
00:38:41.220 political person
00:38:42.320 who's going to
00:38:43.020 use the law to
00:38:44.360 weaponize the law
00:38:46.480 to go after
00:38:46.840 Trump.
00:38:47.220 So she made a
00:38:48.260 bunch of claims
00:38:48.900 that she couldn't
00:38:49.540 back up and
00:38:51.300 ended it with
00:38:52.580 saying, understand
00:38:53.320 that the days of
00:38:54.280 Donald Trump are
00:38:55.120 coming to an end.
00:38:59.400 Wow.
00:39:01.240 And so after all
00:39:04.220 these grand
00:39:04.880 charges of
00:39:05.820 colluding with
00:39:06.560 other countries
00:39:07.200 and money laundering,
00:39:08.300 all these charges,
00:39:09.560 the thing that
00:39:10.300 they're trying to
00:39:11.300 nail him on,
00:39:12.300 after all those
00:39:12.960 great charges,
00:39:14.340 are that he
00:39:15.020 took out a
00:39:15.640 loan and
00:39:16.840 paid it back
00:39:17.700 and paid it back
00:39:17.720 with interest.
00:39:19.860 That's what he's
00:39:20.620 being charged
00:39:21.160 with.
00:39:21.880 Now, as part of
00:39:22.600 that, they say
00:39:23.200 that he overvalued
00:39:24.120 his assets.
00:39:25.360 But their
00:39:26.000 argument is
00:39:26.900 ridiculous on
00:39:28.000 his face,
00:39:28.800 because the way
00:39:29.600 they valued his
00:39:30.540 assets were so
00:39:31.500 laughably wrong
00:39:32.840 that it wouldn't
00:39:34.080 matter what he
00:39:34.660 did.
00:39:35.760 Their case is so
00:39:36.700 laughably,
00:39:38.300 obviously,
00:39:39.520 purely political,
00:39:40.440 legal, that
00:39:42.040 I think
00:39:42.560 Letitia James
00:39:43.320 should go to
00:39:43.760 jail.
00:39:45.760 I mean,
00:39:46.200 when I listen
00:39:46.880 to her and
00:39:47.420 then I see
00:39:47.820 what she's
00:39:48.220 doing, I
00:39:49.100 think, how
00:39:49.520 in the world
00:39:50.180 is this
00:39:50.580 legal?
00:39:52.040 I mean, she's
00:39:52.500 using the
00:39:53.000 legal system,
00:39:54.480 so she's not
00:39:55.640 committing a
00:39:56.280 crime per se,
00:39:57.180 but it looks
00:39:57.860 like a crime,
00:39:59.000 it feels like a
00:40:00.000 crime, it
00:40:00.940 has the effect
00:40:02.440 of a crime.
00:40:04.060 Why isn't it
00:40:04.800 a crime?
00:40:06.940 The crime
00:40:07.640 should be,
00:40:08.300 well, actually,
00:40:08.760 there probably
00:40:09.040 is a crime.
00:40:09.700 There probably
00:40:10.180 is a crime
00:40:10.800 about, you
00:40:12.020 know, what
00:40:13.620 would it be,
00:40:14.220 unsupported
00:40:16.120 prosecution.
00:40:18.680 What would be
00:40:19.320 the name for
00:40:19.760 that?
00:40:21.560 Not just
00:40:22.300 defamation,
00:40:23.220 unsubstantiated,
00:40:25.060 frivolous
00:40:25.620 prosecution,
00:40:27.140 malicious
00:40:27.440 prosecution.
00:40:29.080 Let's go
00:40:29.720 with malicious
00:40:30.320 prosecution.
00:40:31.720 If I were a
00:40:32.560 lawmaker, I
00:40:34.660 would have
00:40:34.940 made a law
00:40:35.420 against malicious
00:40:36.440 prosecution.
00:40:37.560 There must be
00:40:38.240 one.
00:40:39.040 Is there not?
00:40:40.340 Is there no
00:40:40.920 law against
00:40:41.720 using the
00:40:42.360 law maliciously?
00:40:44.420 I feel like
00:40:45.200 there should be
00:40:45.600 a specific
00:40:46.100 law against
00:40:46.620 that.
00:40:49.640 Because there's
00:40:50.420 no way,
00:40:51.720 I don't believe
00:40:52.580 there's any way
00:40:53.200 that Letitia
00:40:53.900 James and her
00:40:54.760 staff believed
00:40:56.340 their own
00:40:57.000 charges.
00:40:58.480 I think they
00:40:59.300 should have to
00:40:59.800 prove that they
00:41:00.760 believed their
00:41:01.560 own charges.
00:41:02.640 Because do you
00:41:03.120 think they have
00:41:03.540 any evidence
00:41:04.400 of any crime?
00:41:05.680 I think I
00:41:08.000 would have
00:41:08.220 seen it.
00:41:09.400 I've seen
00:41:09.900 nothing that
00:41:10.440 would suggest
00:41:10.980 they have
00:41:11.300 evidence of
00:41:11.820 a crime.
00:41:12.620 Have you?
00:41:13.760 So should
00:41:14.780 they not be
00:41:15.540 pushed to
00:41:17.720 show that
00:41:18.240 they had
00:41:18.900 evidence of
00:41:19.460 a crime
00:41:19.840 before they
00:41:20.420 pursued it?
00:41:21.760 I think you
00:41:22.540 could show
00:41:22.900 that they
00:41:23.280 did not
00:41:23.720 have any
00:41:24.240 evidence of
00:41:24.800 a crime
00:41:25.200 and they
00:41:25.780 pursued it
00:41:26.300 anyway.
00:41:27.420 Don't you
00:41:28.060 think?
00:41:28.280 So I
00:41:29.240 think that
00:41:29.800 Trump should
00:41:30.940 get elected
00:41:31.580 and that
00:41:34.000 one way or
00:41:36.100 another she
00:41:36.800 should be
00:41:37.180 brought to
00:41:37.600 justice.
00:41:38.400 Could you
00:41:38.740 do it on
00:41:39.100 federal charges
00:41:39.860 or would it
00:41:40.360 have to be
00:41:40.660 a state
00:41:40.980 charge?
00:41:43.160 Is there
00:41:43.680 any way
00:41:43.940 the feds
00:41:44.600 could get
00:41:45.500 at her
00:41:45.840 for a
00:41:46.140 break in
00:41:46.460 the law?
00:41:47.560 If she
00:41:47.880 goes after
00:41:48.400 a federal
00:41:48.900 case?
00:41:49.380 Oh,
00:41:49.680 she would
00:41:50.480 be interfering
00:41:51.480 with a
00:41:51.900 federal election.
00:41:53.340 There we
00:41:53.680 go.
00:41:54.580 Yeah.
00:41:54.980 She would
00:41:55.300 be interfering
00:41:55.880 with a
00:41:56.480 federal process
00:41:57.420 by trying
00:41:58.000 to put a
00:41:58.360 candidate in
00:41:58.960 jail without
00:41:59.540 legitimate
00:42:00.200 charges.
00:42:01.860 And it
00:42:02.120 would also
00:42:02.480 be RICO.
00:42:04.340 So you
00:42:04.900 could get
00:42:05.240 RICO,
00:42:05.980 because I'm
00:42:06.480 sure it's
00:42:06.760 coordinated,
00:42:07.520 you could
00:42:07.780 find,
00:42:08.400 if you got
00:42:08.880 a hold of
00:42:09.220 her communications,
00:42:10.540 you don't
00:42:11.100 think you
00:42:11.460 would find
00:42:11.820 that she's
00:42:12.220 talking to
00:42:12.740 Democrat
00:42:13.260 leadership?
00:42:15.140 Of course
00:42:15.720 she could.
00:42:17.220 So if you
00:42:18.100 got a hold
00:42:18.520 of her
00:42:18.760 communications,
00:42:19.620 you could
00:42:19.860 find out
00:42:20.340 just how
00:42:21.480 coordinated
00:42:22.000 it was.
00:42:23.720 And I
00:42:24.220 do think
00:42:24.560 there's
00:42:24.800 enough
00:42:25.040 evidence
00:42:25.540 of a
00:42:26.380 crime that
00:42:27.200 you should
00:42:27.460 at least
00:42:27.760 be able
00:42:28.060 to indict,
00:42:29.360 because you
00:42:29.700 can indict
00:42:30.140 for just
00:42:30.700 about anything.
00:42:31.820 So I
00:42:32.220 think it
00:42:32.500 needs to
00:42:32.820 be mutually
00:42:35.020 assured
00:42:35.540 disaster.
00:42:38.220 I think
00:42:39.060 that if
00:42:39.600 Trump doesn't
00:42:40.280 go to jail,
00:42:40.880 that the
00:42:41.140 prosecutor does
00:42:41.900 have to go
00:42:42.320 to jail in
00:42:42.760 this case.
00:42:44.440 Yeah.
00:42:45.220 Yeah,
00:42:45.500 mutually
00:42:45.820 assured
00:42:46.220 destruction.
00:42:48.020 I think
00:42:48.700 that the
00:42:49.160 prosecutors all
00:42:50.100 need to go
00:42:50.520 to jail if
00:42:52.020 they lose.
00:42:52.920 If they win,
00:42:53.820 we're in bad
00:42:54.300 shape.
00:42:54.920 But if they
00:42:55.340 lose, they
00:42:55.700 all have to
00:42:55.980 go to jail.
00:42:56.400 That's my
00:42:57.140 take.
00:43:02.520 All right.
00:43:04.080 Rasmussen also
00:43:04.960 asked how
00:43:05.680 many people
00:43:06.120 think our
00:43:07.040 intelligence
00:43:07.520 agencies in
00:43:08.420 the U.S.
00:43:08.780 are influencing
00:43:09.400 the news
00:43:10.000 media.
00:43:11.140 65%
00:43:12.220 think it
00:43:13.480 is likely
00:43:13.940 that U.S.
00:43:14.540 intelligence
00:43:14.860 agencies are
00:43:15.840 influencing
00:43:16.460 news coverage.
00:43:19.800 65%.
00:43:20.480 So two-thirds
00:43:23.340 of the
00:43:23.620 public thinks
00:43:24.820 the news
00:43:25.360 is fake
00:43:26.060 and fake
00:43:27.360 because our
00:43:28.080 intelligence
00:43:28.500 people are
00:43:29.440 manipulating
00:43:30.520 it.
00:43:31.680 How in the
00:43:32.160 world is that
00:43:32.700 not 100%?
00:43:35.060 That's low.
00:43:36.600 It's amazing
00:43:37.460 that there are
00:43:38.040 that many people
00:43:38.640 who don't
00:43:39.000 understand how
00:43:39.920 anything works.
00:43:40.760 If you actually
00:43:42.260 believe that the
00:43:43.080 news operated
00:43:43.980 independently,
00:43:45.180 you would be
00:43:46.280 so confused
00:43:47.300 by what
00:43:48.300 you're seeing.
00:43:49.320 As soon as
00:43:50.000 you realize
00:43:50.420 it's all
00:43:50.960 fixed,
00:43:53.040 I'll tell
00:43:54.340 you,
00:43:54.640 I stopped
00:43:55.580 worrying about
00:43:56.420 Rob Reiner's
00:44:00.020 tweets.
00:44:01.080 They used to
00:44:01.800 drive me crazy.
00:44:03.660 But then I
00:44:04.340 look at him
00:44:04.720 and I go,
00:44:05.260 oh,
00:44:06.580 he's probably
00:44:07.180 just working
00:44:07.800 with somebody,
00:44:08.560 if you know
00:44:08.860 what I mean.
00:44:10.120 And then once
00:44:10.620 you realize
00:44:11.040 that,
00:44:11.960 and I don't
00:44:12.260 know that
00:44:12.600 that's true,
00:44:13.520 it's just
00:44:13.900 observably,
00:44:15.720 it looks like
00:44:16.260 the logical
00:44:16.820 conclusion.
00:44:18.320 It looks like
00:44:19.120 the obvious
00:44:19.780 conclusion.
00:44:20.460 Doesn't mean
00:44:20.820 it's true,
00:44:21.800 but it looks
00:44:22.260 obvious.
00:44:23.460 Then it doesn't
00:44:24.120 bother you anymore.
00:44:25.000 He's just like
00:44:25.620 a commercial.
00:44:26.780 Commercials
00:44:27.220 don't bother you.
00:44:29.260 All right,
00:44:29.740 let's talk about
00:44:30.460 Gates trying
00:44:32.040 to vacate
00:44:32.860 McCarthy's seat,
00:44:34.800 the Republican
00:44:37.500 Speaker of the
00:44:38.660 House.
00:44:39.740 So,
00:44:41.680 let's see if I
00:44:42.520 can summarize
00:44:43.020 this for those
00:44:43.860 of you who
00:44:44.260 are not paying
00:44:44.740 attention.
00:44:45.100 So,
00:44:46.660 every year
00:44:47.440 the Congress
00:44:48.340 has to pass
00:44:49.020 a budget,
00:44:50.160 but nobody
00:44:50.700 wants to cut
00:44:51.380 anything because
00:44:52.040 that makes
00:44:52.360 you unpopular.
00:44:53.920 So,
00:44:55.060 they all get
00:44:56.540 together and
00:44:57.180 they try to
00:44:57.600 screw the
00:44:58.100 public by
00:44:59.260 putting all
00:44:59.940 the separate
00:45:01.480 bills into
00:45:02.120 one big one
00:45:02.900 so that if
00:45:04.100 you vote
00:45:04.480 against the
00:45:04.960 one big one,
00:45:06.280 you're a loser
00:45:07.860 and you're
00:45:08.280 terrible.
00:45:09.660 But then they
00:45:10.520 can get all
00:45:11.080 their little
00:45:11.820 budgets through
00:45:12.500 without being
00:45:13.040 cut.
00:45:13.340 So,
00:45:16.960 PJ says,
00:45:18.620 Scott,
00:45:19.020 is purposely
00:45:19.620 undervaluing
00:45:20.200 your property's
00:45:21.020 tax evasion?
00:45:22.720 For a loan?
00:45:24.140 No.
00:45:27.400 No.
00:45:31.240 Was that the
00:45:32.060 question?
00:45:32.740 How about for
00:45:33.320 insurance?
00:45:34.700 For insurance,
00:45:35.720 it would be
00:45:36.440 paying more
00:45:37.000 insurance than
00:45:37.660 you need to
00:45:38.080 pay.
00:45:39.120 If you're
00:45:39.740 talking about
00:45:40.180 property tax,
00:45:41.280 I don't believe
00:45:41.860 that's part of
00:45:42.340 the charges.
00:45:43.940 So,
00:45:44.360 here's what I
00:45:44.900 would advise
00:45:45.460 you,
00:45:45.740 because based
00:45:46.180 on this
00:45:46.480 comment,
00:45:47.840 if you're
00:45:48.540 looking at
00:45:48.920 the Trump
00:45:49.540 legal jeopardy
00:45:52.000 and you're
00:45:52.780 looking at
00:45:53.160 what he did
00:45:53.580 with banks
00:45:54.120 and insurance
00:45:54.740 companies,
00:45:55.640 if you do
00:45:56.540 not have a
00:45:57.240 business
00:45:57.620 education,
00:46:00.280 shut the
00:46:00.740 fuck up.
00:46:01.720 You have
00:46:02.120 no idea
00:46:02.540 what's
00:46:02.780 happening.
00:46:04.480 Just shut
00:46:05.140 the fuck
00:46:05.500 up.
00:46:06.780 Right?
00:46:07.160 Or talk
00:46:07.680 to a banker.
00:46:09.140 Talk to a
00:46:09.680 banker.
00:46:10.280 Ask a banker
00:46:11.060 if they
00:46:12.080 take the
00:46:13.520 customer's
00:46:14.380 word for
00:46:15.320 what they're
00:46:15.700 worth.
00:46:16.940 Nobody does.
00:46:18.140 Right?
00:46:18.960 So,
00:46:19.400 your minimum
00:46:20.000 requirement for
00:46:20.840 being part of
00:46:21.380 this conversation
00:46:22.060 is you have to
00:46:22.660 have a business
00:46:23.400 background.
00:46:24.480 If your
00:46:25.140 background is
00:46:25.800 art,
00:46:26.900 you might be
00:46:27.380 an awesome
00:46:27.700 person who
00:46:28.220 makes great
00:46:28.700 art.
00:46:29.800 But you
00:46:30.420 shouldn't be
00:46:30.840 in this
00:46:31.100 conversation.
00:46:32.260 You're not
00:46:32.620 qualified.
00:46:33.620 If you think
00:46:34.320 the news is
00:46:35.100 telling you
00:46:35.460 something useful
00:46:36.240 about the
00:46:37.720 nature of the
00:46:38.240 charges,
00:46:38.700 they're not.
00:46:39.240 Not even
00:46:40.000 close.
00:46:41.200 The story
00:46:41.880 is so
00:46:42.640 botched.
00:46:43.780 I think
00:46:44.520 it's partly
00:46:45.040 because there
00:46:46.060 aren't that
00:46:46.420 many business
00:46:46.980 people who
00:46:47.480 do the
00:46:47.800 news.
00:46:48.860 But I
00:46:49.480 doubt it's
00:46:49.960 even being
00:46:50.360 reported
00:46:50.740 correctly on
00:46:51.580 the business
00:46:52.580 channels.
00:46:53.780 I haven't
00:46:54.180 watched them,
00:46:54.840 but I'll bet
00:46:55.180 the business
00:46:55.680 channels are
00:46:56.240 totally botching
00:46:56.920 the story.
00:46:58.020 Have you seen
00:46:58.440 any of the
00:46:58.840 business stories
00:46:59.480 say,
00:47:00.380 there's no
00:47:00.680 such thing
00:47:01.140 as a bank
00:47:01.760 that trusts
00:47:02.980 you when you
00:47:03.660 say your
00:47:03.960 asset is worth
00:47:04.720 a certain
00:47:05.080 amount?
00:47:06.140 In the history
00:47:06.980 of the world,
00:47:07.460 that's never
00:47:07.820 happened.
00:47:08.120 But only
00:47:09.500 business people
00:47:10.200 know that.
00:47:11.340 Artists don't
00:47:11.880 know that.
00:47:12.620 The artists
00:47:13.000 think that
00:47:13.620 this is real
00:47:14.300 because the
00:47:15.440 court is
00:47:15.820 involved,
00:47:16.380 so it must
00:47:16.800 be real.
00:47:17.780 No, it's
00:47:18.140 not real.
00:47:19.280 It is just
00:47:20.140 a political
00:47:20.840 attack.
00:47:22.080 You need to
00:47:22.700 understand you
00:47:23.420 don't live in
00:47:23.920 the country you
00:47:24.500 thought you
00:47:24.880 did.
00:47:26.020 We do not
00:47:26.780 live in a
00:47:27.620 country where
00:47:28.380 the law is
00:47:30.260 being properly
00:47:30.940 applied and
00:47:32.400 that our
00:47:32.860 political
00:47:33.420 participants are
00:47:35.960 being fairly
00:47:36.540 treated.
00:47:36.920 We're not
00:47:37.540 in that
00:47:37.920 world.
00:47:38.760 They are
00:47:39.060 being absolutely
00:47:40.120 targeted for
00:47:41.120 destruction by
00:47:42.560 very bad
00:47:43.540 people.
00:47:45.100 And part of
00:47:45.820 that is fooling
00:47:46.880 you with
00:47:48.060 complicated stories
00:47:49.220 so that you
00:47:50.000 think you
00:47:50.500 understand what's
00:47:51.300 going on.
00:47:52.300 Oh, he's in
00:47:53.500 court for a
00:47:54.700 banking thing.
00:47:55.560 I guess he
00:47:55.980 tried to do
00:47:57.300 some fraud.
00:47:58.360 No, there's
00:47:59.280 absolutely no
00:48:00.040 evidence of
00:48:00.580 that.
00:48:01.340 None.
00:48:02.300 And there
00:48:02.860 probably won't
00:48:03.480 be because the
00:48:04.600 nature of a
00:48:05.400 banking relationship
00:48:06.380 is that the
00:48:07.380 banking checks
00:48:08.100 everything
00:48:08.540 themselves.
00:48:09.960 That's core to
00:48:11.180 their job.
00:48:12.420 It's not
00:48:12.820 something that
00:48:13.360 might have
00:48:13.780 happened this
00:48:14.240 time and
00:48:14.660 maybe not.
00:48:15.740 No, it's
00:48:16.240 central to
00:48:17.640 what a banker
00:48:18.240 does.
00:48:19.120 They check.
00:48:20.400 I was a banker
00:48:21.100 so I'm not
00:48:21.560 talking from,
00:48:22.660 and I was a
00:48:23.220 lender as well.
00:48:24.220 So I'm not
00:48:24.580 talking from,
00:48:26.280 you know, because
00:48:26.600 I read a book
00:48:27.200 about it.
00:48:28.060 I was an
00:48:28.480 actual bank
00:48:29.080 lender.
00:48:30.180 We don't take
00:48:30.900 anybody's word
00:48:31.560 for anything,
00:48:32.260 ever.
00:48:33.040 There are no
00:48:33.420 exceptions to
00:48:34.100 that.
00:48:34.360 If the
00:48:40.120 property tax
00:48:40.960 thing comes
00:48:41.640 up, maybe
00:48:44.280 there's more
00:48:44.860 of a story
00:48:45.300 there, but I
00:48:45.740 haven't even
00:48:46.040 heard that
00:48:46.380 one.
00:48:46.900 I don't
00:48:47.180 even think
00:48:47.480 that's part
00:48:47.860 of the
00:48:48.040 charges.
00:48:51.360 So let
00:48:52.140 me explain
00:48:52.560 this Gates
00:48:53.600 McCarthy
00:48:54.000 thing.
00:48:54.980 So Gates
00:48:55.500 said he
00:48:56.200 got McCarthy
00:48:56.860 some months
00:48:57.960 back in
00:48:58.500 order to,
00:48:59.980 as part of
00:49:00.720 Gates agreeing
00:49:01.500 to support
00:49:02.140 McCarthy to be
00:49:02.900 the speaker,
00:49:04.460 Gates and
00:49:05.360 his little
00:49:06.420 pack of
00:49:07.260 rogues got
00:49:08.560 McCarthy to
00:49:09.180 agree that
00:49:09.760 they would
00:49:10.100 only give
00:49:10.500 them spending
00:49:11.120 deals in
00:49:12.380 packages that
00:49:13.720 were separate.
00:49:14.920 But then I
00:49:15.600 guess he did
00:49:16.060 a trick where
00:49:16.640 he waited until
00:49:17.380 they didn't
00:49:17.700 have time to
00:49:18.220 read the
00:49:18.600 packages, which
00:49:19.500 was just as
00:49:20.100 good as
00:49:20.480 putting them
00:49:21.100 all in one
00:49:21.520 place.
00:49:22.540 So there
00:49:23.120 does seem
00:49:23.600 to be some
00:49:24.320 trickery involved
00:49:25.640 that clearly
00:49:27.820 the process
00:49:28.660 cannot stand
00:49:30.200 transparency.
00:49:31.440 So there
00:49:33.180 is an
00:49:34.060 obvious
00:49:35.380 observable
00:49:36.260 move to
00:49:37.520 make the
00:49:38.300 budget dealings
00:49:39.540 less transparent
00:49:40.720 in front of
00:49:42.140 the public
00:49:42.740 whose money
00:49:43.840 it is.
00:49:44.760 If anybody
00:49:45.420 is trying to
00:49:45.940 make the
00:49:46.260 process less
00:49:47.300 transparent,
00:49:48.540 as in you're
00:49:49.400 not going to
00:49:49.720 have time to
00:49:50.260 read the
00:49:50.600 bills, you
00:49:51.700 got to vote
00:49:52.100 on it, but
00:49:52.720 trust us, you
00:49:53.380 don't have time
00:49:53.820 to read it,
00:49:55.080 no good.
00:49:56.220 Or if they
00:49:56.700 take a bunch
00:49:57.200 of bills and
00:49:57.660 they stick them
00:49:58.240 together into
00:49:58.800 one big
00:49:59.320 Frankenstein
00:50:00.000 bill so
00:50:00.920 you don't
00:50:01.280 quite know
00:50:01.720 what's going
00:50:02.080 on, no
00:50:03.280 good, no
00:50:04.480 good.
00:50:04.940 You've got to
00:50:05.320 be transparent
00:50:06.000 because it's
00:50:07.220 our money.
00:50:08.980 So Gates is
00:50:09.620 working toward
00:50:10.180 that transparency
00:50:10.980 and also
00:50:11.980 making politicians
00:50:13.480 keep their
00:50:14.060 word because
00:50:15.560 McCarthy promised
00:50:16.480 to deal with
00:50:17.080 them one way
00:50:17.580 and Gates
00:50:18.140 says that
00:50:18.680 he's not
00:50:19.040 doing it.
00:50:19.940 So even
00:50:21.400 Thomas Massey
00:50:22.220 thinks that
00:50:23.540 McCarthy should
00:50:24.460 not be removed
00:50:25.380 because in
00:50:26.420 many ways he's
00:50:27.220 a better speaker
00:50:28.080 than the
00:50:28.480 Republicans have
00:50:29.160 had before.
00:50:29.700 That's what
00:50:30.800 Massey says.
00:50:32.360 But is this
00:50:34.480 one issue
00:50:35.140 the one that
00:50:37.020 you want to
00:50:37.800 throw everything
00:50:38.720 away for?
00:50:39.680 And my answer
00:50:40.540 is yes.
00:50:41.840 Yes, this is
00:50:42.580 the one issue
00:50:43.140 to throw
00:50:43.580 everything away
00:50:44.320 for.
00:50:45.180 You should put
00:50:45.740 the entire
00:50:46.260 country at
00:50:46.920 risk to get
00:50:48.320 this done.
00:50:50.020 Normally I
00:50:50.800 would say,
00:50:51.260 no, no, no,
00:50:51.680 don't do
00:50:52.120 anything that
00:50:52.500 puts the
00:50:52.780 whole country
00:50:53.360 at risk.
00:50:54.560 But this,
00:50:55.200 you have to
00:50:55.540 do it.
00:50:55.860 This is
00:50:57.120 an existential
00:50:57.960 risk.
00:50:58.980 If we just
00:50:59.860 keep voting
00:51:00.500 money that
00:51:01.020 we don't
00:51:01.360 have, we
00:51:02.620 are guaranteed
00:51:03.280 to be out of
00:51:03.960 business as a
00:51:04.620 country.
00:51:05.360 So we have
00:51:06.080 a design that
00:51:06.900 guarantees
00:51:07.320 failure.
00:51:09.600 Nobody's
00:51:10.200 arguing with
00:51:10.760 that statement.
00:51:12.220 Let me say
00:51:12.680 it again.
00:51:13.500 And keep in
00:51:13.960 mind that
00:51:14.360 there's nobody,
00:51:15.120 left or right,
00:51:16.560 who will
00:51:16.900 disagree with
00:51:17.540 this following
00:51:18.040 statement.
00:51:19.500 Our current
00:51:20.440 design of
00:51:22.300 how we
00:51:22.640 approve things
00:51:23.400 guarantees the
00:51:24.900 destruction of
00:51:25.580 America.
00:51:26.840 It guarantees
00:51:27.360 it.
00:51:28.380 It's not even
00:51:29.020 up for debate.
00:51:30.300 You couldn't
00:51:30.780 find anybody
00:51:31.380 who would
00:51:31.620 debate with
00:51:32.040 that point.
00:51:33.140 Nobody believes
00:51:33.920 you can keep
00:51:34.460 spending more
00:51:35.880 money than
00:51:36.300 you have
00:51:36.680 forever.
00:51:37.660 That's not
00:51:38.220 a thing.
00:51:39.800 But we're
00:51:40.480 in that
00:51:40.780 system.
00:51:41.780 And there's
00:51:42.140 exactly one
00:51:42.860 person who's
00:51:44.040 willing to
00:51:44.500 take the
00:51:44.940 risk that's
00:51:45.760 big enough
00:51:46.280 that maybe
00:51:47.360 could fix
00:51:47.860 it.
00:51:48.640 I don't
00:51:49.020 even know
00:51:49.340 if it
00:51:49.540 would.
00:51:50.480 I don't
00:51:50.820 know if it
00:51:51.160 can be
00:51:51.460 fixed.
00:51:52.440 But I
00:51:52.760 know there's
00:51:53.340 only one
00:51:53.740 person trying
00:51:54.520 and he
00:51:56.040 will be
00:51:56.520 almost,
00:51:57.360 if he's
00:51:57.960 not completely
00:51:58.620 destroyed by
00:51:59.380 this, he's
00:52:00.320 going to be
00:52:00.620 totally attacked.
00:52:01.900 They're going
00:52:02.240 to try to
00:52:02.640 impeach him
00:52:03.400 and remove
00:52:04.020 him from
00:52:04.420 everything.
00:52:05.360 I mean,
00:52:05.520 they're going
00:52:05.760 to go really
00:52:06.240 hard because
00:52:07.340 transparency is
00:52:08.400 something that
00:52:08.900 the Congress
00:52:09.380 can't handle.
00:52:11.120 They can't do
00:52:12.040 their job if
00:52:12.680 you're watching,
00:52:14.240 which tells
00:52:15.240 you something
00:52:15.660 about the job
00:52:16.320 they're doing.
00:52:18.540 So I'm
00:52:20.440 going to take
00:52:20.860 a different
00:52:21.300 position from
00:52:22.200 Thomas Massey.
00:52:23.340 And it's
00:52:24.940 because I
00:52:25.280 have a
00:52:25.460 different risk
00:52:26.140 profile.
00:52:28.040 So if
00:52:28.620 you're a
00:52:28.840 member of
00:52:29.180 Congress, I
00:52:30.120 can see how
00:52:30.620 you'd want to
00:52:31.220 not take
00:52:32.180 super big
00:52:32.820 risks, which
00:52:33.940 is a good
00:52:34.340 impulse.
00:52:35.080 So I still
00:52:35.940 like Thomas
00:52:36.520 Massey's way
00:52:37.800 of thinking.
00:52:38.420 I like his
00:52:38.800 transparency.
00:52:39.960 I like that he
00:52:40.600 says in public
00:52:41.220 why he's doing
00:52:41.880 what he's doing.
00:52:42.680 So I respect
00:52:43.260 all of that
00:52:43.800 even when I
00:52:44.320 disagree.
00:52:45.400 This is an
00:52:46.240 existential
00:52:47.280 moment.
00:52:48.260 and there's
00:52:49.460 only one
00:52:49.860 person who's
00:52:50.400 even acting
00:52:51.080 like he
00:52:51.540 understands
00:52:52.160 it.
00:52:53.220 The rest
00:52:53.880 don't even
00:52:54.240 act like
00:52:54.580 they understand
00:52:55.160 it.
00:52:56.120 Like I
00:52:56.460 think they
00:52:56.760 do, but
00:52:58.020 they act
00:52:58.320 like they
00:52:58.660 don't.
00:52:59.320 That's no
00:52:59.860 good.
00:53:01.540 So I
00:53:02.860 hope Gates
00:53:03.400 succeeds in
00:53:04.460 completely
00:53:05.000 destroying the
00:53:05.880 effectiveness of
00:53:06.660 Congress until
00:53:08.100 something useful
00:53:09.080 gets done.
00:53:11.720 All right.
00:53:12.280 three scientists
00:53:16.540 won the
00:53:16.960 Nobel Prize
00:53:17.580 in physics
00:53:18.280 for studying
00:53:22.160 how electrons
00:53:23.600 zip around
00:53:24.280 the atom
00:53:24.860 in the
00:53:25.760 tiniest
00:53:26.120 fraction of
00:53:26.680 a second.
00:53:27.700 So I
00:53:27.880 guess somehow
00:53:28.340 they figured
00:53:28.800 out how to
00:53:29.440 get a
00:53:30.780 video of
00:53:31.280 an atom
00:53:31.620 or an
00:53:32.180 electron
00:53:32.560 zipping
00:53:33.000 around.
00:53:33.780 It's a
00:53:34.200 fuzzy picture
00:53:34.760 and they
00:53:35.260 don't know
00:53:35.580 what to do
00:53:36.000 with it
00:53:36.320 or how
00:53:36.840 useful it
00:53:37.320 will be,
00:53:37.680 but someday
00:53:38.660 that might
00:53:39.120 be super
00:53:40.120 important.
00:53:41.580 They're not
00:53:41.940 quite sure
00:53:42.360 how.
00:53:43.880 But the
00:53:44.500 three are,
00:53:45.480 let's say,
00:53:45.980 Pierre Agostini,
00:53:48.540 Ferenc Krauss,
00:53:50.140 and French-born
00:53:51.620 Anne Hulier.
00:53:53.520 Now it's
00:53:54.180 two guys
00:53:54.800 and a
00:53:55.040 woman,
00:53:56.840 and the
00:53:57.620 AP did a
00:53:58.240 big story
00:53:58.660 about it,
00:53:59.120 and that's
00:53:59.300 where I
00:53:59.560 saw it.
00:54:00.520 Do you
00:54:01.120 think they
00:54:01.540 showed the
00:54:02.000 three of
00:54:02.380 them standing
00:54:02.860 there?
00:54:03.940 No,
00:54:04.420 they didn't.
00:54:05.080 They showed
00:54:05.540 a half-page
00:54:07.620 photo of
00:54:08.340 the woman.
00:54:10.320 Now,
00:54:10.920 how many
00:54:11.460 women,
00:54:12.580 either
00:54:12.840 individually
00:54:13.500 or as
00:54:14.240 part of
00:54:14.540 a team,
00:54:15.500 do you
00:54:15.820 think were
00:54:16.160 nominated
00:54:16.660 for the
00:54:17.320 Nobel Prize?
00:54:21.340 You know
00:54:21.900 where I'm
00:54:22.120 going with
00:54:22.580 this,
00:54:22.800 right?
00:54:25.420 Now,
00:54:25.900 she wasn't
00:54:26.820 a black
00:54:27.160 lesbian,
00:54:27.760 but you
00:54:28.040 know where
00:54:28.300 I'm going
00:54:28.660 with this,
00:54:29.100 right?
00:54:29.940 Did you
00:54:30.540 used to
00:54:30.940 think the
00:54:31.300 Nobel Prize
00:54:32.000 was something
00:54:34.540 you'd be
00:54:35.020 proud of
00:54:35.500 if you
00:54:35.800 won?
00:54:37.720 I used
00:54:38.540 to think
00:54:38.900 that.
00:54:39.300 I used
00:54:39.560 to think,
00:54:39.920 wouldn't it
00:54:40.140 be great
00:54:40.480 if I
00:54:40.700 won a
00:54:40.980 Nobel Prize
00:54:41.600 for
00:54:41.840 something.
00:54:42.880 Doesn't
00:54:43.300 matter what.
00:54:44.660 And now
00:54:44.940 I see
00:54:45.240 this,
00:54:45.660 and the
00:54:45.880 first thing
00:54:46.220 I think
00:54:46.560 is,
00:54:47.280 this is
00:54:49.080 terrible
00:54:49.480 for the
00:54:49.940 woman,
00:54:50.760 because the
00:54:52.020 woman is a
00:54:52.540 scientist,
00:54:53.900 and for,
00:54:54.660 as far as I
00:54:55.260 know,
00:54:55.520 she did a
00:54:55.900 great job,
00:54:56.480 and she
00:54:56.720 absolutely
00:54:57.220 deserves this,
00:54:58.620 right?
00:54:59.160 Let's say
00:54:59.660 that first.
00:55:01.720 It's entirely
00:55:02.560 possible,
00:55:03.840 if not
00:55:04.480 probable,
00:55:04.960 that the
00:55:06.580 woman was
00:55:07.260 an important
00:55:07.920 part of
00:55:08.280 the team,
00:55:09.600 her contributions
00:55:10.500 really opened
00:55:11.600 up a field
00:55:12.480 of study
00:55:13.060 that wasn't
00:55:13.880 there before,
00:55:15.000 and could
00:55:15.500 be really
00:55:15.960 important.
00:55:16.780 But,
00:55:17.460 in the
00:55:18.100 context of
00:55:19.100 overdone
00:55:20.120 wokeness,
00:55:21.100 I assume
00:55:21.900 the opposite.
00:55:23.600 I assume
00:55:24.140 she didn't
00:55:24.700 deserve it.
00:55:26.620 That's what
00:55:27.280 I assume.
00:55:28.300 And that
00:55:28.720 is really
00:55:29.420 fucked up,
00:55:30.800 right?
00:55:31.620 It's not,
00:55:32.600 it sounds
00:55:33.020 like it
00:55:33.360 would be
00:55:33.760 misogynist,
00:55:35.720 but it's
00:55:36.380 not,
00:55:36.820 because it
00:55:37.040 has nothing
00:55:37.400 to do
00:55:37.740 with the
00:55:37.960 woman,
00:55:39.240 right?
00:55:39.480 It has
00:55:39.820 nothing to
00:55:40.260 do with
00:55:40.480 other
00:55:40.680 women.
00:55:41.740 It has
00:55:41.960 to do
00:55:42.240 with
00:55:42.540 wokeness
00:55:43.380 is going
00:55:44.160 to give
00:55:44.460 the prize
00:55:44.960 to the
00:55:45.280 woman if
00:55:45.840 there's
00:55:46.040 one running.
00:55:47.180 The only
00:55:47.840 thing we
00:55:48.240 had to
00:55:48.540 know is
00:55:49.940 that there
00:55:50.340 was at
00:55:50.640 least one
00:55:51.200 woman on
00:55:51.960 at least
00:55:52.340 one team,
00:55:54.280 and then
00:55:54.980 you could
00:55:55.320 have predicted
00:55:55.800 she would
00:55:56.180 win the
00:55:56.480 award,
00:55:57.300 as well
00:55:57.820 as the
00:55:58.080 rest of
00:55:58.480 the team.
00:55:59.360 Now,
00:55:59.800 I would
00:56:00.400 love to
00:56:00.800 think it's
00:56:01.360 all legitimate
00:56:01.860 and this
00:56:02.460 was the
00:56:03.180 best team
00:56:03.860 and as
00:56:05.160 best the
00:56:05.680 judges could
00:56:06.280 determine it
00:56:07.120 was the
00:56:07.460 most impressive
00:56:08.500 accomplishment and
00:56:09.540 everybody
00:56:09.880 contributed.
00:56:11.920 It's actually
00:56:12.740 probable,
00:56:13.840 but the
00:56:14.600 entire process
00:56:15.520 has no
00:56:17.040 credibility left
00:56:17.960 at all.
00:56:19.100 There's just
00:56:19.440 no credibility.
00:56:21.480 So,
00:56:22.820 all of
00:56:25.220 these awards
00:56:25.880 went from
00:56:27.020 being the
00:56:28.100 best thing
00:56:28.580 that could
00:56:28.860 ever happen
00:56:29.320 to you in
00:56:29.920 life to
00:56:31.400 absolutely
00:56:32.260 being
00:56:32.960 sort of
00:56:34.220 icky.
00:56:35.760 Like,
00:56:36.260 imagine if
00:56:37.640 you're the
00:56:37.900 guys.
00:56:39.260 Imagine the
00:56:39.820 two men
00:56:40.280 on the
00:56:40.580 team.
00:56:41.920 Do you
00:56:42.200 think that
00:56:42.540 they're going
00:56:42.920 home and
00:56:43.400 saying privately
00:56:44.060 to their
00:56:44.480 spouses,
00:56:45.300 this is like
00:56:46.080 the greatest
00:56:46.520 thing that's
00:56:47.020 ever happened
00:56:47.480 to me,
00:56:47.980 but do you
00:56:49.600 think we
00:56:49.960 would have
00:56:50.260 won if we
00:56:50.740 didn't have
00:56:51.040 a woman
00:56:51.360 on the
00:56:51.740 team?
00:56:51.940 And the
00:56:53.980 spouse will
00:56:54.520 say,
00:56:55.480 I don't
00:56:56.700 know.
00:56:56.960 it's
00:56:58.640 really
00:56:58.880 messed up.
00:57:00.020 So,
00:57:00.200 even the
00:57:00.580 guys are
00:57:01.240 not going
00:57:01.540 to have
00:57:01.700 a clean
00:57:02.100 win,
00:57:02.720 like I
00:57:03.200 would
00:57:03.340 imagine.
00:57:04.000 In their
00:57:04.480 minds,
00:57:04.940 they're probably
00:57:05.260 thinking,
00:57:06.660 yes,
00:57:07.120 our teammate,
00:57:09.180 the woman
00:57:09.780 on the team
00:57:10.200 was great,
00:57:11.300 but probably
00:57:12.420 a lot of
00:57:12.860 other people
00:57:13.340 did great
00:57:13.820 things too.
00:57:15.300 Why did
00:57:15.760 we get
00:57:16.080 picked?
00:57:17.800 And it's
00:57:18.480 going to
00:57:18.640 make their
00:57:19.020 accomplishment
00:57:19.560 feel lessened.
00:57:21.640 So,
00:57:22.320 that's
00:57:23.120 going on.
00:57:28.500 Here's a
00:57:29.140 story that
00:57:29.560 made the
00:57:29.980 social media
00:57:30.600 news that
00:57:31.780 trans women
00:57:32.860 will be
00:57:33.320 banned from
00:57:34.080 female hospital
00:57:35.080 wars in
00:57:35.580 the UK under
00:57:37.200 a new plan
00:57:37.900 to push
00:57:38.720 back against
00:57:40.000 wokery,
00:57:41.600 as the
00:57:42.460 tweet goes.
00:57:44.380 Now,
00:57:45.500 why is
00:57:46.960 that news?
00:57:48.560 Why is
00:57:49.000 it news that
00:57:49.780 trans women,
00:57:51.020 which would
00:57:51.320 be people
00:57:52.620 who were
00:57:52.860 born biologically
00:57:53.820 with male
00:57:55.160 parts,
00:57:56.220 why would
00:57:57.920 they be
00:57:58.220 banned from
00:57:58.800 a female
00:57:59.300 hospital ward?
00:58:00.780 Well,
00:58:01.120 the reason
00:58:01.480 given is
00:58:02.180 for the
00:58:03.640 safety and
00:58:04.420 comfort of
00:58:05.140 the other
00:58:06.680 people in
00:58:07.160 the female
00:58:07.880 ward.
00:58:09.280 But,
00:58:10.080 more importantly,
00:58:11.300 why is it
00:58:11.760 news?
00:58:14.620 Just think
00:58:15.420 about this
00:58:15.820 for a moment.
00:58:17.240 Why is
00:58:17.700 it news?
00:58:19.780 Because it
00:58:21.200 gets clicks?
00:58:21.960 No,
00:58:22.200 not really.
00:58:24.380 It's news
00:58:25.500 because somebody
00:58:26.320 did something
00:58:26.960 smart.
00:58:29.220 Normally,
00:58:30.100 that's not
00:58:30.580 news.
00:58:33.720 Think about
00:58:34.700 it.
00:58:35.920 What is it
00:58:37.200 news to do
00:58:38.660 something that's
00:58:39.440 obvious and
00:58:40.140 smart?
00:58:42.560 Right.
00:58:43.240 That we've
00:58:44.140 reached a point
00:58:44.720 in history,
00:58:45.220 we've
00:58:46.320 actually
00:58:46.580 reached a
00:58:47.060 point where
00:58:48.040 our level
00:58:49.200 of incompetence
00:58:50.280 is so
00:58:51.340 stunningly
00:58:52.360 thorough that
00:58:53.720 when somebody
00:58:54.240 does something
00:58:54.800 that makes
00:58:55.240 sense to
00:58:55.720 you,
00:58:56.600 it's a
00:58:57.760 fucking
00:58:58.020 headline.
00:59:02.120 We're
00:59:02.760 very close
00:59:03.520 to the point
00:59:04.040 where it
00:59:04.520 will be
00:59:04.780 news that
00:59:06.180 there was a
00:59:06.680 vote in
00:59:07.120 Congress on
00:59:08.600 a specific
00:59:09.260 bill,
00:59:10.120 you know,
00:59:10.420 without being
00:59:10.880 lumped with
00:59:11.360 other things,
00:59:12.160 and nobody
00:59:13.020 pulled a
00:59:13.560 fire alarm.
00:59:15.220 And that'll
00:59:15.780 be like a
00:59:16.180 headline.
00:59:16.860 Whoa!
00:59:18.440 There was
00:59:19.040 transparency in
00:59:19.920 the vote,
00:59:20.700 and there was
00:59:21.880 no fuckery,
00:59:22.800 and nobody
00:59:23.480 pulled an
00:59:23.900 alarm, and
00:59:24.300 they just
00:59:24.600 voted on it,
00:59:25.240 and then they
00:59:25.680 passed it into
00:59:26.480 law, and then
00:59:26.920 it was a
00:59:27.220 thing.
00:59:28.580 Like, we're
00:59:29.060 so close to
00:59:30.580 complete
00:59:31.360 incompetence that
00:59:32.820 any little
00:59:33.400 glimmer of
00:59:34.400 smartness feels
00:59:35.620 like, can you
00:59:37.860 do that?
00:59:40.340 I would argue
00:59:41.280 that my
00:59:41.720 cancellation
00:59:42.340 was national
00:59:45.960 news, because
00:59:47.560 what I said
00:59:48.180 made sense,
00:59:49.360 not because
00:59:50.420 it was
00:59:50.720 offensive.
00:59:52.900 If it was
00:59:53.680 simply offensive,
00:59:55.020 it probably
00:59:55.580 wouldn't have
00:59:55.900 made news.
00:59:58.780 It's because
00:59:59.480 it made
00:59:59.800 sense.
01:00:01.180 The people
01:00:01.620 heard it in
01:00:02.180 context.
01:00:02.740 Again, I
01:00:03.420 never said
01:00:03.820 anything about
01:00:04.300 anybody's DNA
01:00:05.140 or their
01:00:05.620 culture.
01:00:06.560 I don't do
01:00:07.060 that.
01:00:08.360 But certainly
01:00:09.000 you can say
01:00:09.460 things about
01:00:10.000 the way people
01:00:10.600 are trained
01:00:11.760 and educated,
01:00:13.020 and if one
01:00:13.580 group of
01:00:14.020 people are
01:00:14.380 trained and
01:00:14.920 educated to
01:00:16.280 think that
01:00:16.660 the other
01:00:16.980 group are
01:00:17.460 their enemies
01:00:18.020 and the
01:00:18.860 enemy has
01:00:19.340 your stuff
01:00:19.740 and you
01:00:20.000 should get
01:00:20.300 it back,
01:00:21.140 that's a
01:00:22.300 bad place
01:00:22.940 to be.
01:00:24.120 If you
01:00:24.640 had a
01:00:24.860 choice, you
01:00:26.500 should go
01:00:26.800 somewhere else.
01:00:27.540 There's not
01:00:27.860 really any
01:00:28.260 practical way
01:00:28.900 to do that,
01:00:29.500 but that
01:00:30.540 was the
01:00:30.940 hyperbolic
01:00:32.040 point.
01:00:34.360 Well, I
01:00:34.920 saw a story
01:00:35.480 that I don't
01:00:36.000 believe, which
01:00:36.780 is the
01:00:37.360 Sinaloa
01:00:38.900 cartel, which
01:00:40.780 has traditionally
01:00:41.660 been a big
01:00:42.200 fentanyl source.
01:00:43.680 Now, I
01:00:43.920 guess since
01:00:44.660 the boss
01:00:45.340 El Chapo
01:00:46.220 got locked
01:00:47.400 up, his
01:00:49.520 cartel is
01:00:50.480 now partly
01:00:51.200 run by his
01:00:51.840 four sons
01:00:52.480 and partly
01:00:54.040 run by some
01:00:54.800 other leader
01:00:55.900 who took a
01:00:56.460 part of it.
01:00:57.860 And I guess
01:00:58.380 the other
01:00:58.720 leader is
01:00:59.460 continuing to
01:01:00.140 do fentanyl,
01:01:01.220 but the
01:01:01.580 four sons
01:01:02.300 allegedly,
01:01:03.500 don't know
01:01:03.860 if this is
01:01:04.280 true, were
01:01:05.640 trying to
01:01:06.920 tell their
01:01:07.320 own operation
01:01:08.020 to stop
01:01:08.540 doing fentanyl
01:01:09.440 and get
01:01:09.880 out of the
01:01:10.240 fentanyl
01:01:10.640 business.
01:01:11.720 Now, what
01:01:12.060 do you
01:01:12.200 make of
01:01:12.520 that?
01:01:14.140 First of
01:01:14.740 all, does
01:01:15.120 that sound
01:01:15.500 even a
01:01:16.000 little bit
01:01:16.440 true, that
01:01:17.820 any part of
01:01:18.540 the cartels
01:01:19.140 for any
01:01:19.740 reason would
01:01:20.740 try to get
01:01:21.160 out of the
01:01:21.480 fentanyl
01:01:21.860 business?
01:01:22.980 It doesn't
01:01:23.840 sound true.
01:01:25.260 But you
01:01:25.700 could imagine
01:01:26.320 that El Chapo
01:01:28.120 was being
01:01:28.720 pressed in
01:01:30.500 some way
01:01:31.120 like this.
01:01:32.940 Here's the
01:01:33.480 deal, El
01:01:33.880 Chapo.
01:01:34.880 We've got
01:01:35.540 five or so,
01:01:37.220 I don't
01:01:37.780 know how
01:01:38.100 many, maybe
01:01:38.580 at least
01:01:39.000 four Republican
01:01:40.840 presidential
01:01:41.500 candidates who
01:01:42.820 are going to
01:01:43.180 send the
01:01:43.580 military in
01:01:44.340 to destroy
01:01:44.880 you.
01:01:46.100 If you
01:01:46.700 don't want
01:01:47.140 that, go
01:01:48.020 back to
01:01:48.460 just selling
01:01:48.980 marijuana and
01:01:49.960 cocaine and
01:01:51.280 heroin, which
01:01:52.420 don't kill
01:01:52.900 nearly as much
01:01:53.600 as fentanyl.
01:01:54.460 If you go
01:01:54.940 back to that,
01:01:55.780 we won't
01:01:56.260 invade the
01:01:56.800 country.
01:01:57.640 We'll just
01:01:58.060 do the
01:01:58.400 usual
01:01:58.760 interdiction
01:01:59.660 stuff and
01:02:00.580 try to
01:02:00.940 arrest you
01:02:01.360 as we can.
01:02:02.300 We'll go
01:02:02.680 back to our
01:02:03.160 cat and
01:02:03.500 mouse thing,
01:02:04.660 and by the
01:02:05.160 way, we
01:02:05.760 might even do
01:02:06.340 some business
01:02:06.880 with you,
01:02:07.860 some secret
01:02:08.640 business.
01:02:09.580 Maybe our
01:02:10.120 CIA needs a
01:02:11.040 little secret
01:02:11.440 money.
01:02:12.240 Maybe we
01:02:12.620 can go easy
01:02:13.160 on you, you
01:02:13.820 help us
01:02:14.220 out, that
01:02:15.120 sort of
01:02:15.380 thing.
01:02:16.080 That's what
01:02:16.600 it looks
01:02:16.840 like.
01:02:18.400 So my
01:02:19.020 guess is
01:02:19.520 that somebody
01:02:20.040 tried to
01:02:20.720 negotiate a
01:02:21.460 deal in
01:02:22.140 which the
01:02:22.720 Sinaloa folks
01:02:24.340 would get
01:02:24.740 out of
01:02:25.040 fentanyl in
01:02:27.180 return for
01:02:27.840 some kind
01:02:28.520 of easier
01:02:29.900 action, or
01:02:32.560 somebody gets
01:02:33.080 out of jail
01:02:33.580 or something.
01:02:34.440 El Chapo's
01:02:35.020 wife was
01:02:35.580 released.
01:02:36.800 Could it
01:02:37.120 be possible
01:02:37.700 that El
01:02:38.440 Chapo worked
01:02:39.100 a deal where
01:02:40.220 his wife would
01:02:41.020 be released
01:02:41.720 in return for
01:02:43.420 him causing
01:02:45.100 his sons to
01:02:45.780 get out of
01:02:46.100 the fentanyl
01:02:46.560 business?
01:02:47.680 Maybe.
01:02:49.560 You can
01:02:50.200 imagine that
01:02:50.760 being a deal.
01:02:51.700 I don't know
01:02:52.100 that it was.
01:02:53.400 But this
01:02:57.000 was always the
01:02:57.780 way to get
01:02:58.260 this done.
01:03:00.480 The way to
01:03:01.240 stop fentanyl
01:03:02.040 was probably
01:03:03.960 for intelligence
01:03:04.920 people to
01:03:06.220 work a deal
01:03:06.840 with the
01:03:07.420 cartels so
01:03:09.120 that they
01:03:09.420 could still
01:03:09.840 be rich,
01:03:10.700 but we
01:03:11.160 wouldn't send
01:03:11.640 their military
01:03:12.140 in because
01:03:12.700 there was too
01:03:13.120 much public
01:03:14.160 pressure to
01:03:14.700 do it.
01:03:16.100 So something's
01:03:17.420 happening,
01:03:18.360 but I doubt
01:03:19.340 it will have
01:03:19.660 any impact on
01:03:20.400 the supply of
01:03:21.300 fentanyl.
01:03:22.400 All right.
01:03:24.420 So yesterday
01:03:25.140 I did a
01:03:26.960 podcast
01:03:28.180 interview.
01:03:32.500 And I'm
01:03:33.240 going to do
01:03:33.440 one tomorrow.
01:03:34.500 I'll let you
01:03:34.880 know all
01:03:35.960 about those.
01:03:36.500 So yesterday
01:03:36.880 I talked to
01:03:37.580 Pearl,
01:03:38.320 of pearly
01:03:38.840 things.
01:03:40.160 I'll let you
01:03:40.840 know when
01:03:41.100 that's up.
01:03:42.100 And in
01:03:42.780 theory,
01:03:43.440 unless it
01:03:44.280 gets postponed,
01:03:45.460 I better
01:03:45.780 check my
01:03:46.180 messages.
01:03:46.560 So unless
01:03:55.760 it gets
01:03:56.780 canceled,
01:03:57.240 I'll be
01:03:57.460 doing Russell
01:03:58.360 Brand today.
01:04:00.700 And I think
01:04:01.860 it would show
01:04:02.540 up for your
01:04:03.440 viewing a
01:04:04.280 little later
01:04:04.660 this week,
01:04:05.220 but I don't
01:04:06.060 want to give
01:04:06.380 you a date
01:04:07.400 on that until
01:04:08.900 it's confirmed.
01:04:10.660 Because with
01:04:11.440 podcasting,
01:04:12.460 things get
01:04:13.120 rescheduled
01:04:13.860 just all the
01:04:14.620 times.
01:04:16.560 All right.
01:04:19.740 So that's
01:04:20.540 happening.
01:04:21.340 My other
01:04:21.900 podcast would
01:04:23.900 be Megan
01:04:24.560 Kelly, if
01:04:25.660 you want to
01:04:26.020 do a Google
01:04:26.540 search.
01:04:27.500 I'm told the
01:04:28.180 Megan Kelly
01:04:29.020 interview and
01:04:29.900 the Michael
01:04:30.260 Malice
01:04:30.740 interviews,
01:04:31.620 you can
01:04:32.020 Google both
01:04:32.780 of those,
01:04:33.820 were some
01:04:34.700 of my best
01:04:35.180 work.
01:04:35.940 So if you
01:04:36.220 like to see
01:04:36.620 some of my
01:04:37.080 best work,
01:04:38.300 apparently it's
01:04:38.800 there.
01:04:40.400 All right.
01:04:46.560 Those are the
01:04:49.240 only ones that
01:04:49.860 are scheduled
01:04:50.600 right now.
01:04:53.480 Can you go
01:04:54.240 on the
01:04:54.520 all-in
01:04:55.020 podcast?
01:04:56.040 Well, I
01:04:57.220 don't know.
01:04:57.620 I've got a
01:04:58.200 few other
01:04:58.500 podcasts I'll
01:04:59.160 be looking
01:04:59.800 at going
01:05:00.520 on, but
01:05:01.120 they're not
01:05:02.060 all practical.
01:05:02.740 They're not
01:05:03.300 all really
01:05:04.520 in my sweet
01:05:06.740 spot.
01:05:07.080 If drugs
01:05:12.600 were legal,
01:05:13.360 dosages would
01:05:14.560 be known
01:05:15.100 and consistent
01:05:15.780 and overdoses
01:05:16.680 would decline.
01:05:18.040 You know, I
01:05:18.440 used to think
01:05:19.000 that.
01:05:20.820 So there's
01:05:21.520 one view that
01:05:22.280 if drugs were
01:05:23.080 legal, people
01:05:24.620 would get,
01:05:25.120 let's say, a
01:05:25.680 legal fentanyl
01:05:26.580 pill, and
01:05:27.800 then they would
01:05:28.220 take it, and
01:05:29.080 it wouldn't be
01:05:29.640 enough to give
01:05:30.160 them any
01:05:31.140 kind of an
01:05:31.540 OD.
01:05:33.280 That is
01:05:34.880 from somebody
01:05:35.480 who has never
01:05:36.180 met an
01:05:36.620 addict.
01:05:38.040 Can I
01:05:38.640 explain an
01:05:39.180 addict for
01:05:39.640 you?
01:05:40.440 Hey, your
01:05:40.920 fentanyl is
01:05:41.680 now legal, and
01:05:43.520 it's all
01:05:44.080 regulated, and
01:05:45.780 it's free.
01:05:47.480 It's free.
01:05:48.580 Just come in,
01:05:49.120 and we'll give
01:05:49.480 you a fentanyl
01:05:50.120 pill that
01:05:50.540 definitely won't
01:05:51.160 kill you.
01:05:52.040 What does the
01:05:52.740 addict do?
01:05:54.200 Every time.
01:05:55.260 Not sometimes,
01:05:56.040 but every time.
01:05:57.200 They go in,
01:05:58.040 they get their
01:05:58.460 free pill.
01:05:59.640 Oh, thank you
01:06:00.440 for the free
01:06:00.900 pill.
01:06:02.720 And then they
01:06:03.460 send their
01:06:03.880 friend in to
01:06:04.380 get another
01:06:04.780 free pill.
01:06:05.980 Friend is not
01:06:06.720 an addict, but
01:06:07.360 they go in
01:06:07.820 and say, oh,
01:06:08.120 I'm a totally
01:06:08.520 addict, give
01:06:09.300 me a free
01:06:09.640 pill.
01:06:10.780 Friend gets
01:06:11.300 a free
01:06:11.620 pill, gives
01:06:13.180 it to the
01:06:13.540 addict, so
01:06:13.960 he has two
01:06:14.320 pills.
01:06:15.620 Because the
01:06:16.140 addict says,
01:06:16.800 one pill's not
01:06:17.420 enough for me.
01:06:18.500 I've built up so
01:06:19.500 much tolerance, I'm
01:06:20.560 like a three-pill
01:06:21.280 person.
01:06:22.560 So the addict
01:06:23.440 keeps taking the
01:06:24.400 free pills as
01:06:25.680 much as he can
01:06:26.320 get.
01:06:27.140 And then if the
01:06:28.060 free pills are
01:06:28.660 not enough, what
01:06:30.060 does he do?
01:06:30.500 He buys illegal
01:06:33.040 drugs to add to
01:06:35.200 the free pill.
01:06:37.300 Now, if you
01:06:37.940 didn't know that
01:06:38.780 that will happen
01:06:39.420 every time with
01:06:41.400 a serious addict,
01:06:42.460 then you shouldn't
01:06:43.780 be part of this
01:06:44.320 conversation.
01:06:45.840 That's basic.
01:06:47.280 If you don't
01:06:48.060 understand the
01:06:48.680 addicts will do
01:06:49.620 whatever they can
01:06:50.540 to get more, and
01:06:52.420 that more is the
01:06:53.500 only quantity that
01:06:54.440 makes sense, there's
01:06:55.820 no such thing as,
01:06:57.020 here's enough,
01:06:57.820 hey, addict, why
01:07:00.720 don't you try that
01:07:01.360 with alcohol?
01:07:04.040 Why don't you say
01:07:04.920 to alcoholics, hey,
01:07:06.020 alcoholic, I've got
01:07:07.000 a deal for you.
01:07:08.260 One free beer every
01:07:10.180 day.
01:07:11.920 That should take
01:07:13.460 care of your
01:07:13.780 problem, right?
01:07:14.800 Because your problem
01:07:15.400 is drinking too
01:07:16.180 much.
01:07:16.700 But I will give
01:07:17.340 you one free beer
01:07:18.680 every day.
01:07:20.840 No more
01:07:21.520 alcoholics.
01:07:22.800 Hey, I solved
01:07:23.520 alcoholism because I
01:07:25.200 gave them one free
01:07:26.100 beer every day, and
01:07:27.060 it's well-measured
01:07:27.800 and safe, and I
01:07:29.740 guarantee you that
01:07:31.120 nobody's going to
01:07:31.740 have an overdose or
01:07:32.800 die of alcoholism
01:07:33.840 from one beer a
01:07:34.740 day.
01:07:35.840 So, I guess I
01:07:37.360 nailed that, didn't
01:07:38.120 I?
01:07:38.840 Eh?
01:07:39.320 Is there any other
01:07:39.880 problems you'd like
01:07:40.500 me to solve?
01:07:41.340 No.
01:07:41.620 So that's the
01:07:42.080 problem with
01:07:42.560 legalized drugs.
01:07:45.180 If you look at
01:07:46.400 legalized drugs from
01:07:47.520 your own non-addict
01:07:49.220 point of view, it
01:07:50.120 sort of makes
01:07:50.580 sense.
01:07:51.720 But as soon as
01:07:52.640 you say an
01:07:53.860 addict only wants
01:07:54.800 one quantity,
01:07:56.420 more,
01:07:56.820 more, there's
01:07:58.200 only one quantity
01:07:59.420 an addict wants
01:08:01.240 more, right?
01:08:04.540 Once you learn
01:08:05.260 that trick, then
01:08:06.620 everything makes
01:08:07.200 sense.
01:08:07.760 Like why things
01:08:08.560 don't work, why
01:08:09.460 things do work, it
01:08:10.780 all makes sense when
01:08:12.540 you realize that they
01:08:13.520 only want more.
01:08:14.940 In all cases, every
01:08:16.400 time.
01:08:16.820 That's what addiction
01:08:17.640 is.
01:08:20.580 Addicts always go to
01:08:21.620 11.
01:08:22.040 That is correct.
01:08:22.700 They don't stop at
01:08:23.740 10.
01:08:26.820 All right.
01:08:31.080 And that, ladies
01:08:31.940 and gentlemen, was
01:08:33.560 everything I needed
01:08:34.260 to do today.
01:08:34.960 I've got to get
01:08:35.520 ready to talk to
01:08:36.640 Russell Brand.
01:08:37.580 I'll let you know
01:08:38.200 when that drops.
01:08:40.220 And that's all for
01:08:42.420 today.
01:08:43.880 I'll talk to you
01:08:44.660 later.
01:08:44.860 But I would
01:08:59.400 stop.
01:08:59.800 I'll let you have
01:09:00.420 you
01:09:00.800 now.