Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2260 Scott Adams： Coffee With Scott 10⧸13⧸2023

00:00:00.000 good morning everybody and welcome to the highlight of human civilization it's called

00:00:19.000 coffee with scott adams now shortened to cwsa because that's how cool we are we don't need

00:00:25.160 full words anymore no no no no if you'd like your experience of cwsa to go to new levels all you

00:00:33.240 need is a cup of mug or a glass a tank of chelsea stein a canteen jug or flask a vessel of any kind

00:00:38.940 fill it with your favorite liquid i like coffee join me now for the unparalleled pleasure

00:00:45.180 the dopamine hit of the day i think it makes everything better it's called the simultaneous

00:00:51.940 sip it happens now

00:00:55.160 sublime

00:01:00.460 well we'll talk about all the things happening in the news don't worry i like to start with some

00:01:08.780 appetizers mental appetizers i call them now i mentioned this before but i think it's worth

00:01:14.860 restating bill gates in a recent interview that's been getting around the internet said and i quote

00:01:21.880 uh there's a lot of climate exaggeration said gates the climate is not the end of the planet

00:01:29.300 so the planet is going to be fine and quote no temperate country is going to become uninhabitable

00:01:36.940 now is that a big deal

00:01:42.240 or not a big deal

00:01:44.020 don't you think that's a big deal and i and i feel like

00:01:48.560 when you're watching the world fall apart with a you know the war in europe and the war in the 0.64

00:01:55.400 east i feel like we're starting to put climate change in context

00:02:00.700 i i feel like there are some things you can worry about when you don't have other problems

00:02:08.140 let me ask you this have you ever seen less news about the trans

00:02:15.860 situation in america i've never seen less trans news

00:02:21.580 now while i'm fully you know sympathetic to the trans situation certainly want them to have

00:02:29.800 perfectly good lives whatever makes them happy but i'm not sure it was ever the most important issue

00:02:37.800 in the world it was closer to the bottom certainly critical issue to people directly involved but i think

00:02:46.360 we're seeing a a real adjustment of our priorities in real time when you start to think about

00:02:53.140 eating and survival you know you're worried a lot less about people's uh sexual orientations and

00:03:00.680 genders and stuff like that but climate change i think is in that category um that people are going

00:03:07.620 to understand that maybe there was a little hyperbole involved now i like the fact that bill gates said it

00:03:13.900 because bill gates is the one person that everybody kind of thinks he's you know sort of the voice of

00:03:22.880 climate change in a way i mean i think of him that way i don't really think of a greta

00:03:26.980 you know or or carrie you know they're all deeply involved but i feel like bill gates was the one person

00:03:34.960 who understood all the technology you know he knows nuclear he knows coal i mean he's got a sense of the

00:03:42.140 whole field and if he says it's exaggerated or they can ignore him i feel like this is the like a real

00:03:51.340 changing that to me this feels like a real inflection point and how the world thinks about climate change

00:03:57.700 we'll see well tucker is making news being provocative tucker carlson and one of the things he said he came up

00:04:08.080 with a bunch of provocative quotes but this one this one's a pretty pretty provocative he says what's

00:04:15.500 happening on the southern border isn't just an invasion but a crime the politicians and ngos

00:04:22.060 responsible for it are criminals who should be punished accordingly do you think that our politicians

00:04:29.740 should be in jail for their current policies because that would be biden well just biden really it would

00:04:39.780 just be one person because in america there's only one person who makes the decision so does he really

00:04:45.680 think that biden should be in jail for a policy that isn't working out really jail wouldn't that be

00:04:55.840 just um kind of repeating january 6th's mistake then imagining that people who are politicians and

00:05:06.060 maybe they're doing their job maybe they would make mistakes but are they criminal just because people

00:05:14.520 died from their mistakes pretty severe so i'm gonna disagree with tucker that these actions are criminal

00:05:22.500 they're absolutely not criminal they are genocidal they're genocidal they guarantee that there will be

00:05:30.440 genocide in this country if if not reversed almost immediately so now tucker you were completely wrong

00:05:38.260 they should not be punished as criminals um but we should take seriously the fact that they've allowed

00:05:44.960 genocide uh consciously it's a conscious decision because there's no way they don't understand

00:05:52.500 what they're bringing into the country now to be clear the vast majority of immigrants just 1.00

00:05:59.040 looking for a better life and i i welcome them even the illegal ones i'm happy to have illegal ones here 0.80

00:06:05.580 too if it turns out they're here for the right reason you know it's not my first choice let's be clear

00:06:12.180 first choice is full control of our borders but i'm not super concerned about hard-working

00:06:19.900 christian families coming across the border and trying to fit in that that's just not where i'm

00:06:25.680 going to put all my worry but i do think we need a secure border however the fact that they can come in 0.59

00:06:32.000 also highlights the fact that anybody else can come in and there's no way we're not being invaded by 0.52

00:06:37.020 terrorists you know that right there's no way the terrorists are staying home they're definitely

00:06:44.940 coming in and we're going to see something not too unlike what happened in israel probably in the

00:06:51.760 next five years five years i guess you're going to see something like that so yes whoever is bringing

00:06:59.580 in genocide to our country maybe we should consider different leadership let's talk about the speaker of

00:07:06.680 the house now i'm not sure i know all the you know the back room dealings and personalities and all that

00:07:15.660 but i did see one thing that i liked a lot so when it looked like it was going to be jim jordan or steve

00:07:22.700 scalise jim jordan endorsed the other guy he endorsed scalise now i'm trying to figure out how clever this was

00:07:35.320 because it could turn out just to be freaking genius because what happened was scalise found out he

00:07:42.300 couldn't get the support he needed for the job and he took himself out now jim jordan seems to be the

00:07:49.680 likely person to take the job after endorsing his competitor oh you can't win harder than that

00:07:59.300 just think of anything that's a bigger win than endorsing your opponent and then winning

00:08:07.820 that that's the perfect situation the the whole job of the speaker is to figure out how to make people

00:08:16.220 get along you know and jim jordan's sort of a fire thrower but you know he throws his fire at the

00:08:22.300 democrats so the fact that he would play it this way which shows you know real skill i think

00:08:30.680 it looked like real skill now this assumes i'm making a lot of assumptions here i can't read his

00:08:35.660 mind but i'm assuming he knew that scalise either would get the job then it would be easy to work with

00:08:42.960 him which would be not a bad outcome or he would not get the job and jordan would look like the

00:08:49.440 cross the aisle well it's just not across the aisle but he would look like a peacemaker it's kind

00:08:56.140 of perfect yeah i don't have a strong opinion about jim jordan one way or the other but if the

00:09:02.620 republicans think that's their guy you know i don't have a special problem with it or i don't really have

00:09:10.240 a prediction about it either i would say he's very capable seems very uh seems well liked in general

00:09:18.160 on the republican side so we'll see that could work out um i saw matt gates saying that uh you know

00:09:29.300 somebody questioned how this could be an improvement you know wouldn't it have been better some say to

00:09:35.340 just let mccarthy stay there because he was good at his job and we you know we'd have somebody in

00:09:40.940 charge during these critical times to which matt gates said he lied repeatedly so if we get somebody

00:09:49.580 in the job who doesn't lie to us repeatedly that's an upgrade i agree totally that you can't have a

00:09:57.660 speaker of the house who's lying to you repeatedly his whole job is to be trusted i mean that's that's so

00:10:06.160 baked into the whole core process if if somebody's making promises to people you know in order to

00:10:13.820 pull a little coalition together for some some specific thing you can't lie to those people

00:10:19.100 there'll never be another coalition so you know i can't fact check how much lying went on and if it's

00:10:28.200 you know more than the usual politician or anything like that i don't have a sense of that

00:10:32.100 but i love that as a standard i love the standard that you'll fire your own boss

00:10:38.520 for lying to you repeatedly i don't think i can love that more honestly now again mccarthy would

00:10:47.300 probably say he didn't do any lying so let's let's be honest i don't know exactly who's doing what

00:10:52.140 but if it's true they that the boss got fired for lying to the uh staff you know effectively

00:11:01.040 i love that that's that's a move ahead so matt gates i think you get the win on this

00:11:06.820 in my opinion um now all those smart people um you know the smart people right smart people the

00:11:16.420 pundits the people we've elected to lead us you know the smart people they are unified in one thing

00:11:22.480 they're saying that not having a speaker of the house uh is causing immense harm to america

00:11:28.680 and i couldn't agree with it more let me just list all the immense harms i mean just so far i mean

00:11:36.760 it's early but just so far from not having a speaker of the house let's see some of the immense harms were

00:11:42.940 um um well never mind never mind next story salon has a big article um about the trump lovers being

00:11:59.120 a cult now it appears that that's going to be a main line of attack this time that it's a cult

00:12:07.320 oh don't join the cult they don't know what they're doing because they're in a cult

00:12:12.780 so salon uh talks to some psychologists who i would recommend you never ever go to a psychologist

00:12:21.840 every time i see a psychologist making any kind of comment about the news you know something that's

00:12:29.140 related to the news i just shake my head and say okay that's the experience i had you know the one 0.97

00:12:35.660 time i went to a like a marriage counselor i thought i might be with the dumbest person

00:12:41.800 who ever lived that's what i thought so but apparently the ones they talk to will say things

00:12:49.000 in the news and be on record uh not exactly painting their profession in glory but uh one of the

00:12:56.880 psychologists they talked to said that uh the trumpers the maggot people are a cult because and this is

00:13:03.760 important for the definition of a cult because people would be afraid to leave the cult

00:13:09.460 what what they heard of desantis he's making a lot of news he's like a governor he's running for

00:13:23.500 president do you know that uh dave rubin backs desantis and i still talk to him i know i know

00:13:33.660 like like like if he texts me i'll actually return his text he left the cult and yet amazingly i don't hate 0.85

00:13:45.620 his fucking guts he's still the great guy that he was before who knew who knew you could actually be a 0.92

00:13:53.540 reasonable person and leave the bank of cult 1.00

00:13:56.380 you know i'm the perfect example uh you know i was obviously well associated with sporting trump

00:14:06.620 at the moment i'm uh endorsing vivek i've had no problems with that what was i supposed to be

00:14:15.460 ostracized from the cult where when did that happen i registered as democrat this year just so i'd

00:14:23.740 you know uh slimed the democrats with my own bad reputation nobody cared nobody cared uh what what is

00:14:33.320 it that what is it the democrats are seeing that would suggest mega people couldn't change their mind

00:14:42.600 and live a happy life it's like ridiculously easy to do i didn't i didn't even know there was a risk

00:14:50.020 nobody told me there was some risk involved of that i had no idea

00:14:54.300 well um speaking of cults i remind you that on monday i have a volunteer a democrat and a mega hater

00:15:08.560 has volunteered i finally found somebody who would do this in public so on spaces the audio feature

00:15:15.140 on the x platform on this monday 10 16 at 6 30 p.m eastern time i'll be talking to you if all goes

00:15:25.200 well i hope he shows up i think he will um and i'll be deprogramming a democrat in public now i want

00:15:32.420 to be clear it's not a debate it's not a debate debate is useless i'm actually going to deprogram

00:15:40.400 or that's the attempt now before you get all you know cocky and you think ah we're going to deprogram

00:15:49.980 those democrats i could do the same thing with a republican it would be different topics but i could

00:15:57.180 do the same thing so don't get too cocky if if this works out i might do a republican next because

00:16:04.240 there's nobody who's not in their own bubble there's nobody who's not in the bubble in fact

00:16:11.360 um as i tweeted today the world is in what i call phase one of waking up

00:16:18.940 in phase one of waking up which would be another way of saying you know learning to understand your

00:16:25.760 actual reality better that would be the waking up part in phase one we we realize that our adversaries 1.00

00:16:32.540 are not always uh you know stupid and evil and under-informed that they're literally brainwashed 0.99

00:16:40.140 would you say that that's an accurate statement of the people you disagree with would you say that 1.00

00:16:46.880 hamas is brainwashed you would yeah of course you would you say since most of my audiences

00:16:53.780 leans right would you say that the people on the left are brainwashed does is that word too strong

00:17:00.740 or would you agree with that characterization yes yes now and you know of course as i just mentioned

00:17:07.760 you know the people you're calling brainwashed you know that they're calling you brainwashed

00:17:13.120 you all know that right so we're in phase one where we're sure we're not but the other people are

00:17:21.300 and the fact that they're calling us brainwashed well it's just another symbol of how brainwashed they

00:17:27.140 are that's phase one that's where we are phase two should we survive as a species to get to it

00:17:35.860 is understanding that we're all in our own bubbles there's no such thing as the other person is

00:17:44.420 brainwashed they are but it's really not about the other person being brainwashed it's about everybody

00:17:52.200 everybody has the opinion assigned to them by their choice of media now they start with a preference

00:17:59.180 either might it might even be baked into your your genes a little bit there's something about that i

00:18:04.240 think that's true but beyond that your your specifics of your belief are just from the media

00:18:10.260 it's just brainwashing and it applies to both sides now i want to be clear that doesn't mean

00:18:17.220 that both sides are wrong you get that right when i say wrong i mean in terms of any policies that come

00:18:25.180 out of it one side is going to have policies that work better than the other side and then you know

00:18:32.180 not necessarily always the same side so so policies are different from the fact that one side might be

00:18:38.140 brainwashed well actually both sides all right so if you'd like to see the first part of this the

00:18:44.540 phase one deprogramming monday at 6 30 eastern time i hope that actually happens it'll be live so

00:18:53.900 anything could happen including um the guest not showing up but i think you will all right yeah nbc news

00:19:01.420 uh has embarrassed itself i missed this story but apparently uh yesterday or so they had claimed on nbc news

00:19:11.760 that they had quote gained access to the community notes function on x and once they had gained access

00:19:21.420 they determined that uh uh that instead of fighting false and misleading information there were false

00:19:29.420 things on that had been totally unattended and so therefore this community notes thing

00:19:37.980 not so good that's what they said and then the fact check came in from community notes

00:19:46.700 that's right community notes fact checked nbc story about community notes

00:19:53.100 um and here's what they said um i will paraphrase you did not gain access to any special twitter system

00:20:07.980 they merely talked to somebody who does community notes and there's just somebody who is a community

00:20:15.180 notes person who just showed on their screens and do you know about those things that they were uh

00:20:24.220 that they were ignoring they're just things that they had not yet added a note to

00:20:31.500 that was nbc's big story they looked over somebody's shoulder and didn't understand what they were 0.74

00:20:37.180 seeing that's it that was their investigative report so just so you don't think salon is a ridiculous uh 0.99

00:20:47.660 bullshit nbc news also some ridiculous bullshit and if i mentioned msnbc let's talk about them 0.99

00:20:59.580 apparently they experienced a 33 percent decline in prime time ratings 0.99

00:21:04.220 because of how they covered uh the hamas uh war with israel 33 percent decline now

00:21:14.700 you get declining ratings in a hot war is that the only time that's ever happened in the history of the

00:21:22.860 united states you know since we've had media i've never even heard of that have you do you think

00:21:31.020 during the the gulf wars do you think that there was any news network that lost viewers during a war

00:21:40.380 i'm not even sure this is true i feel like maybe the news isn't true

00:21:46.700 i mean could they really have dropped 33 percent now i understand what the problem was

00:21:52.780 they were a little bit maybe trying to be balanced about something that their viewers thought should not

00:21:58.780 be balanced right that's probably what it was um but man they just got creamed well

00:22:09.260 fox news numbers shot up 42 percent even cnn that went up 17 percent msnbc down 33 percent now here's what i

00:22:20.700 i think is what i think is happening i think they lost their jewish audience and their uh jewish supporting

00:22:27.180 audience you know anybody who was like-minded uh that's probably the whole story yeah so msnbc was not

00:22:38.940 were they too woke does that apply because i'm not sure where wokeness overlaps with what anybody would

00:22:47.660 think about the middle east the middle east is kind of separate from wokeness isn't it

00:22:54.620 not completely yeah well there you go so msnbc learned a valuable lesson today

00:23:03.100 um i think it's interesting that when i got up this morning and checked the x platform one of the

00:23:11.340 words that was trending was brainwashing brainwashing was trending and it wasn't because somebody had been

00:23:19.980 captured in the military sense and brainwashed it's now being used as a headline word to describe the

00:23:28.460 things we're seeing which we used to describe other ways why do we describe it as brainwashing now

00:23:36.620 when we used to describe it as just people disagree what's different

00:23:43.740 what changed to make people what what what changed to make people see it as brainwashing

00:23:54.780 probably me

00:23:55.580 just one of the things it's just one just one of the impacts was me i've been reframing this as

00:24:08.700 two movies on one screen for a long time if you hear two movies on one screen long enough and then you

00:24:14.460 see an example of action like a war was a good example then you see it so clearly that at the very

00:24:22.460 least you know the other people are brainwashed at the very least we used to think that the news was real

00:24:30.300 when we believed that the news was real

00:24:34.620 it kind of did makes it did make kind of sense

00:24:40.540 i've got a little error here

00:24:41.820 oh it looks like uh stream yard is just totally stopped

00:24:51.740 we got a complete stop the rubble killed it

00:24:54.540 can't restart it got no comments

00:25:03.420 let's see if i end it and restart it see what happens oh it's completely dead

00:25:08.380 give me a minute i'm gonna reboot this oh i can't move this

00:25:15.180 let's see if i can even close the window

00:25:17.260 just just is

00:25:22.140 stream yard itself is dead

00:25:30.780 this dream yard itself is dead

00:25:32.780 this dream yard itself is dead

00:25:35.820 this dream yard itself is dead

00:25:39.740 this dream yard itself is dead

00:25:40.320 this dream yard itself is dead

00:25:40.720 myself is dead

00:25:41.600 Thank you.

00:26:11.600 Thank you.

00:26:41.600 Thank you.

00:27:11.600 Hello, people.

00:27:17.040 Is anybody still there?

00:27:20.140 Oh, look at that.

00:27:22.440 Looks like we're back.

00:27:23.560 All right.

00:27:26.540 Sorry, my screen froze up there, but we're back.

00:27:29.740 All right.

00:27:33.580 As I was saying, brainwashing is trending.

00:27:36.620 And I got this comment today on the X platform from a user called Paisano, who said, among other things, he said, I'm thoroughly enjoying your new book, Reframe Your Brain.

00:27:56.740 Reframe Your Brain.

00:27:58.220 My new book that's changing lives all over the place.

00:28:01.080 If you don't have it, you really should.

00:28:03.480 Probably the most important book I've ever written.

00:28:06.380 Probably.

00:28:06.900 Because it's changing people's lives the fastest and the most.

00:28:12.140 But here's the question that Paisano has.

00:28:14.000 He says, as a trained hypnotist master of persuasion, why are you and others like Robert Cialdini trying to launch widespread reframes to make the world a better place?

00:28:25.800 So, Paisano is asking, with my skills, why don't I fix, you know, world peace, world peace.

00:28:36.620 Now, I don't like to complain, but most authors get asked for autographs.

00:28:48.980 Sometimes people say, oh, could you add more than the autograph?

00:28:52.120 Could you say, you know, to my brother, you know, John, and put a little message there?

00:28:58.460 Almost never does somebody ask an author to use his powers to force world peace.

00:29:08.220 But to you, Paisano, I say, challenge accepted.

00:29:14.400 Challenge accepted.

00:29:17.260 All right.

00:29:18.020 Vivek Ramaswamy is making news at the very hardest time that anybody can make news, which is when there's something more interesting going on.

00:29:30.960 And he's getting a lot of heat.

00:29:34.640 So, Hannity, he went at it with Hannity.

00:29:37.740 Hannity just sort of went off on him. 0.88

00:29:39.760 And how many of you saw Vivek talk to Hannity?

00:29:45.380 Give me your one-sentence impression.

00:29:49.240 Did one of them come off better than the other?

00:29:55.740 Because I had a few about it, but I'm biased.

00:30:02.100 It looked to me like Hannity had some kind of a weird meltdown.

00:30:08.200 Is that what you saw?

00:30:09.760 It looked like Hannity was trying to take Vivek out of the race and failed completely. 1.00

00:30:20.460 But he basically just made himself look like a partisan in not the best way.

00:30:25.780 So that was my impression.

00:30:27.680 But, you know, I'm pro-Vivek, so I might be too biased about that.

00:30:31.440 I was wondering if you saw it the same way.

00:30:34.360 All right.

00:30:34.680 Well, so after that, others piled on.

00:30:38.420 One of them is Matt Whitlock.

00:30:44.260 And he tweeted this.

00:30:45.980 He said,

00:30:46.800 This is the 300th time Vivek has said something inflammatory.

00:30:52.260 Been presented with his own words verbatim.

00:30:55.940 And feigned moral outrage that he was being somehow mischaracterized.

00:31:00.540 This is embarrassing, and he should drop out.

00:31:05.040 All right.

00:31:05.220 Here's what you need to know.

00:31:06.620 First of all, I don't think Matt meant 300 times literally.

00:31:10.640 That's a little thing we call hyperbole.

00:31:14.020 Do I criticize him for using hyperbole?

00:31:18.040 No, because I know what he means.

00:31:20.060 What he means is too much.

00:31:22.680 300 is just hyperbole.

00:31:24.300 And those who don't understand hyperbole end up debating the wrong things.

00:31:30.240 It's not about the count.

00:31:32.160 It's just directionally he's saying this guy does this too much.

00:31:36.300 But here's a little media watching trick for you.

00:31:39.640 When you see the word verbatim used this way,

00:31:43.880 this is not somebody you should pay attention to.

00:31:48.180 And I'll tell you why.

00:31:49.460 But listen to how it's used.

00:31:50.360 Just look for the word verbatim in the sentence.

00:31:52.720 This is the 300th time Vivek has been presented with something.

00:31:58.720 In his own words, verbatim,

00:32:01.800 then feigned moral outrage that he was being somehow mischaracterized.

00:32:06.700 To which I tweeted back,

00:32:09.560 almost all of the major political hoaxes are based on verbatims.

00:32:15.020 A verbatim is a signal of a hoax.

00:32:17.780 He's using it as a signal of truth.

00:32:20.400 No, it's like you've got this backwards, Matt.

00:32:23.680 Where have you been?

00:32:26.000 Anytime, anytime you see somebody,

00:32:29.120 oh, but it's verbatim.

00:32:31.180 Watch.

00:32:32.040 Here's this video clip of the president of the United States

00:32:35.340 calling neo-Nazis fine people.

00:32:38.060 Look, it's verbatim.

00:32:39.700 It's verbatim.

00:32:40.980 Yes, it is verbatim.

00:32:42.040 And it's also so in a context that it literally reversed its meaning from condemning them to praising them.

00:32:50.560 That's as reversed as you can get.

00:32:52.780 He condemned people, but then they said,

00:32:55.200 it's verbatim.

00:32:56.140 The part we're going to selectively cut out is called a rupar.

00:32:59.920 When you selectively edit and take the verbatim.

00:33:04.100 And then what do people say when you complain that it's not true?

00:33:08.920 I saw it myself on video.

00:33:11.560 So when you hear the word verbatim or the words, I heard it or saw it myself,

00:33:18.620 that's like a 90% likely signal for fake news.

00:33:23.900 It's really reliable.

00:33:26.440 People don't use those words about real things.

00:33:30.440 There's some words that people consistently use are things that aren't real.

00:33:34.740 And once you learn those words, you spot them right away.

00:33:37.580 As soon as you see that word verbatim.

00:33:43.360 So yes, it's probably the right words, but the wrong context.

00:33:48.380 Then Dan Krenshaw, who is not too happy with Vivek.

00:33:53.900 I guess there's a difference in how much military response

00:33:58.760 the two of them think is appropriate.

00:34:00.820 Vivek would be more, let's not get involved in any military

00:34:03.600 unless it's directly for America's benefit.

00:34:07.840 You know, not this indirect stuff like,

00:34:09.680 oh, maybe China will attack Taiwan unless we attack Ukraine.

00:34:13.660 You know, not this indirect stuff.

00:34:15.220 If it's directly involving us, such as the cartels,

00:34:20.340 then yes, military.

00:34:21.880 That would be Vivek's view.

00:34:23.200 I think I'm characterizing that correctly.

00:34:26.380 But Dan Krenshaw says of Vivek,

00:34:32.260 enough of the Hamas apologists. 0.99

00:34:35.360 Vivek Ramaswamy is dangerously ignorant 0.97

00:34:37.560 when it comes to issues of national security and foreign affairs. 0.98

00:34:41.860 It's apparent from his little list below.

00:34:44.780 I don't know what the list was.

00:34:46.040 They have zero understanding of the region

00:34:47.500 or existing American policy in the region, zero.

00:34:49.840 So, if I can summarize,

00:34:53.840 Dan Krenshaw says that Vivek is a Hamas apologist

00:34:57.140 and too inexperienced

00:35:00.600 to be making decisions at this level.

00:35:03.840 Well, I've got a couple of observations about that.

00:35:09.480 Number one,

00:35:11.420 anytime you see these words,

00:35:14.860 and I should have added to this,

00:35:16.000 apologist.

00:35:16.800 I'm going to add that.

00:35:18.740 I thought I had added that.

00:35:23.900 Apologist.

00:35:24.220 Apologist.

00:35:24.400 Apologist.

00:35:24.460 Apologist.

00:35:24.520 Apologist.

00:35:24.580 Apologist.

00:35:24.620 Apologist.

00:35:26.580 Apologist.

00:35:26.620 Apologist.

00:35:28.460 Apologist.

00:35:28.580 Apologist.

00:35:29.460 Apologist.

00:35:30.460 Apologist.

00:35:30.520 Apologist.

00:35:30.960 Apologist.

00:35:31.960 Apologist.

00:35:36.040 Whenever you see these words,

00:35:38.280 and I'll give you a better view here in a second.

00:35:43.240 Oh, no.

00:35:44.280 I lost my cap.

00:35:47.360 All right.

00:35:48.560 Here's three words

00:35:49.560 that will reliably

00:35:51.120 identify somebody

00:35:53.980 who's not a legitimate debater.

00:35:57.280 Now,

00:35:57.800 the people I'm going to mention,

00:35:59.220 I kind of like, right?

00:36:02.660 So it's not about the people,

00:36:05.640 but they're not being good people when they do this, right?

00:36:10.580 So it's more, I shouldn't say the people are bad.

00:36:12.860 I should just say that they're doing something bad, right?

00:36:16.600 If you say that somebody compared Gaza to the Holocaust,

00:36:23.560 do you think that happened in any real way?

00:36:26.680 There are people who will make that comparison.

00:36:29.220 Then they will be canceled immediately.

00:36:30.940 But do you think that they meant that?

00:36:33.200 Do you think that they meant that they're the same in all the ways?

00:36:37.820 Never.

00:36:38.920 So if you see somebody say,

00:36:40.760 hey, you compared this bad thing to that bad thing,

00:36:44.760 and man, let me tell you,

00:36:46.860 this other bad thing is way worse,

00:36:48.840 and you compared them, you're canceled.

00:36:51.440 Anybody who uses this word compared, 1.00

00:36:55.060 they're fucked up. 0.99

00:36:57.040 Because you never did that. 0.99

00:36:58.460 people just aren't comparing all the things.

00:37:02.340 They're usually comparing one thing.

00:37:04.960 For example,

00:37:07.140 I mentioned for context

00:37:09.260 that although there were 27 Americans

00:37:13.180 who died or so

00:37:14.560 in the Hamas attack,

00:37:17.580 and that's horrible

00:37:19.020 and just almost monstrously

00:37:21.200 hard to even hold in your head.

00:37:22.960 And of course,

00:37:23.800 that was a small subset

00:37:25.000 of the larger tragedy.

00:37:29.340 But for context,

00:37:31.400 I tweeted

00:37:31.980 that

00:37:33.760 about 200 people,

00:37:36.220 Americans a day,

00:37:37.560 die from fentanyl overdoses.

00:37:39.780 About 200 a day.

00:37:41.740 A day.

00:37:42.440 Now,

00:37:44.700 somebody's going to say,

00:37:46.060 because you know they will,

00:37:47.860 Scott,

00:37:48.640 did you just compare

00:37:50.180 overdoses,

00:37:53.120 which are optional

00:37:54.180 because people don't have to do drugs,

00:37:56.060 did you compare that

00:37:57.120 to somebody coming in

00:37:58.840 and like decapitating babies? 0.91

00:38:01.320 Like,

00:38:01.620 how did you compare that?

00:38:03.420 And the answer is,

00:38:04.700 no, 1.00

00:38:05.240 asshole, 1.00

00:38:05.640 I didn't compare them. 1.00

00:38:08.120 You did.

00:38:09.440 That's your word.

00:38:11.260 I said it's good context.

00:38:13.460 Wouldn't you like to know,

00:38:14.520 is 27 a lot of people

00:38:15.780 to die in one day?

00:38:17.240 Turns out it's not.

00:38:19.340 And of course,

00:38:20.300 the circumstances

00:38:21.060 are completely different.

00:38:22.660 But if you're talking about death,

00:38:25.340 do you know those 200 people

00:38:26.740 that died today? 0.99

00:38:29.800 They don't give a fuck 0.99

00:38:31.440 about how other people died. 1.00

00:38:34.600 They're just dead.

00:38:36.660 So dead is dead.

00:38:38.900 So here's what I'll compare.

00:38:40.780 The feelings of the dead 27 people

00:38:43.120 with the feelings of the dead 200.

00:38:46.260 None of them are happy about it,

00:38:47.680 however they got there.

00:38:48.900 But of course,

00:38:49.660 the circumstances

00:38:50.400 are completely different.

00:38:52.900 The moral equivalence argument.

00:38:55.020 I saw Ben Shapiro with this one.

00:38:57.460 Now,

00:38:58.200 I'm going to give

00:38:59.180 a semi-free pass

00:39:02.300 to anyone

00:39:03.720 with Jewish heritage

00:39:05.080 this week.

00:39:08.140 Would you agree

00:39:08.940 that's appropriate?

00:39:11.160 If you're just talking,

00:39:13.420 you know,

00:39:13.700 even in public,

00:39:15.160 I'm going to give you

00:39:15.780 a free pass.

00:39:17.140 You're going to say things

00:39:18.500 that go too far,

00:39:19.860 in my opinion.

00:39:22.100 And I'm going to let that ride.

00:39:24.500 Because this is not,

00:39:25.740 this is not exactly

00:39:26.940 a logic contest.

00:39:29.780 Right?

00:39:30.220 This is not a logic contest.

00:39:32.200 This is about

00:39:33.060 insanely deep emotions.

00:39:37.400 And

00:39:37.960 the response

00:39:39.540 is going to be based on

00:39:40.780 emotion plus power.

00:39:43.340 There will never be

00:39:44.480 a logical element

00:39:45.540 to what's going on.

00:39:47.000 We'll make the arguments.

00:39:48.940 But

00:39:49.140 we're in a situation

00:39:52.780 in which

00:39:53.300 you don't want to get

00:39:54.460 too logical.

00:39:55.420 It's just not

00:39:56.680 what's happening here.

00:39:59.040 So,

00:39:59.920 when Ben Shapiro

00:40:01.260 said,

00:40:01.780 hey,

00:40:01.980 stop making a

00:40:03.060 moral equivalence

00:40:04.820 between what

00:40:05.580 is and will happen

00:40:06.780 in Gaza

00:40:07.660 compared to

00:40:09.800 what happened

00:40:10.340 in Israel

00:40:10.840 because one

00:40:12.040 is a defensive act

00:40:13.340 largely

00:40:14.420 and the other

00:40:15.160 is an offensive act.

00:40:17.400 To which I say,

00:40:19.060 I don't think

00:40:21.060 that's what people

00:40:21.720 were doing.

00:40:22.760 I think

00:40:23.140 literally zero people

00:40:24.320 thought there was

00:40:25.540 a moral equivalence.

00:40:27.180 Now,

00:40:27.440 the only way

00:40:27.860 there's a moral

00:40:28.420 equivalence

00:40:29.380 is in the

00:40:30.740 real,

00:40:33.140 let's say,

00:40:34.260 you know,

00:40:35.140 angels dancing

00:40:36.000 on the head of a pen

00:40:36.760 philosophical way

00:40:37.980 in which you would say,

00:40:39.620 which I say,

00:40:40.440 by the way,

00:40:40.900 this is my view.

00:40:42.340 Once you've achieved

00:40:43.220 pure evil,

00:40:44.940 don't tell me

00:40:46.480 that somebody

00:40:46.920 did two times that.

00:40:48.960 Two times pure evil

00:40:50.040 is just more pure evil.

00:40:52.220 Once it's pure evil,

00:40:54.080 what happened

00:40:55.160 in Israel?

00:40:57.380 You know,

00:40:58.220 there's nothing

00:40:59.140 to compare it to.

00:41:00.580 It's just pure evil.

00:41:01.700 You can have

00:41:02.140 a higher death count,

00:41:03.760 but is that

00:41:04.260 how we're keeping score?

00:41:05.980 Not really.

00:41:06.880 We don't keep score

00:41:07.700 that way.

00:41:08.360 Maybe we should,

00:41:09.040 but we don't.

00:41:11.520 All right.

00:41:12.140 And then

00:41:12.960 apologists.

00:41:14.920 If you see the word

00:41:15.920 apologist,

00:41:17.820 that's just

00:41:18.620 not a good player.

00:41:20.880 Do you think

00:41:23.460 that Vivek

00:41:25.200 is an apologist?

00:41:26.900 Do you think

00:41:27.640 that he approved

00:41:29.180 of Hamas?

00:41:32.520 Like,

00:41:33.020 why would you say

00:41:33.740 that about an American

00:41:34.920 when we're kind of,

00:41:37.260 you know,

00:41:37.660 we're kind of

00:41:38.080 under pressure too here.

00:41:39.340 Why would you say

00:41:40.100 that about an American

00:41:41.060 that you know

00:41:43.940 it isn't true?

00:41:44.520 So any time

00:41:46.460 you see these words,

00:41:47.640 these are not

00:41:48.380 people you should

00:41:50.520 debate.

00:41:51.840 You should close

00:41:52.980 them down

00:41:53.580 and run away.

00:41:55.720 They're just,

00:41:56.980 they're operating

00:41:58.180 on some

00:41:59.200 pure emotional

00:42:00.180 level.

00:42:01.360 They're not

00:42:01.720 trying to be,

00:42:02.720 they're not trying

00:42:04.420 to be logical

00:42:05.160 and win a debate.

00:42:07.200 They're trying

00:42:08.060 to,

00:42:08.480 they're trying

00:42:09.700 to demonize you

00:42:10.740 to take you

00:42:12.000 out of the debate.

00:42:12.780 That's a better

00:42:13.200 way to put it.

00:42:14.040 They're trying

00:42:14.400 to demonize you

00:42:15.460 so that your words

00:42:16.620 will not be heard

00:42:17.600 because they don't

00:42:18.640 like them.

00:42:20.380 Now,

00:42:20.900 I'm not saying

00:42:21.560 that there aren't,

00:42:22.540 you know,

00:42:22.780 people who are doing

00:42:23.660 exactly these things,

00:42:25.140 but you never see it.

00:42:26.740 You know,

00:42:26.960 like in the public debate,

00:42:28.540 Vivek is not apologizing

00:42:30.140 for terrorists. 1.00

00:42:31.000 It's just stupid. 1.00

00:42:32.220 It's fucking stupid. 1.00

00:42:34.480 All right. 1.00

00:42:37.160 So,

00:42:37.720 here's a few things

00:42:38.760 I would say

00:42:39.400 to that.

00:42:40.200 number one,

00:42:44.440 Dan Crenshaw

00:42:45.020 seems to think

00:42:45.800 that experience

00:42:46.740 in national security

00:42:48.480 would be a pretty

00:42:49.700 big advantage.

00:42:52.740 I would say

00:42:53.860 that experience

00:42:55.760 in government

00:42:56.480 is most correlated

00:42:58.380 with corruption.

00:43:00.980 The number one

00:43:02.060 correlation

00:43:02.600 with experience

00:43:03.840 is corruption.

00:43:04.680 That's a reframe

00:43:10.440 you can take

00:43:10.980 to the bank.

00:43:12.700 Do you know

00:43:13.360 why people liked

00:43:14.180 Trump?

00:43:15.400 Because he wasn't

00:43:16.460 a career politician.

00:43:18.440 Do you know

00:43:18.880 what that implied

00:43:19.680 to his supporters?

00:43:21.200 It implied

00:43:21.740 that he wasn't corrupt.

00:43:24.760 When Crenshaw

00:43:25.640 says we need

00:43:26.400 the experienced

00:43:27.020 people to do that,

00:43:27.940 you know how I hear it? 0.60

00:43:30.220 The corrupt people

00:43:31.340 need to be in charge.

00:43:33.420 That's all I hear.

00:43:34.680 The people

00:43:35.680 who have figured out

00:43:36.540 how to profit

00:43:37.200 from the military

00:43:37.920 industrial complex?

00:43:39.520 You can't do that

00:43:40.600 on day one.

00:43:42.020 That's not day one stuff.

00:43:44.000 I've been here

00:43:44.860 for a while.

00:43:45.960 I've got the right

00:43:46.880 positions in Congress.

00:43:48.780 I've reached the level

00:43:49.700 where I'm important enough

00:43:51.700 that somebody would

00:43:52.660 want to give me

00:43:53.740 a reward.

00:43:56.420 Experience

00:43:56.940 in government

00:43:57.780 is a signal

00:43:59.780 for corruption.

00:44:01.620 It doesn't mean

00:44:02.340 every person,

00:44:02.960 but I sure

00:44:04.620 as hell

00:44:05.100 would not

00:44:05.560 prefer experience

00:44:06.820 over the smartest

00:44:08.340 person who's ever

00:44:09.180 run for office

00:44:10.000 who could learn 1.00

00:44:11.160 your fucking job 1.00

00:44:12.020 overnight. 1.00

00:44:14.680 Sorry to say it.

00:44:16.440 I keep saying this.

00:44:18.500 I haven't heard

00:44:19.200 anybody else say it,

00:44:20.120 but we haven't seen

00:44:21.860 a Fave

00:44:22.360 run for office.

00:44:24.820 We've seen

00:44:25.440 a lot of really

00:44:26.140 smart people,

00:44:27.040 a lot of,

00:44:27.400 you know,

00:44:28.120 Ivy League people,

00:44:29.780 people you wouldn't

00:44:30.920 want to compete

00:44:31.500 against in an IQ

00:44:32.380 contest.

00:44:33.320 They're really

00:44:33.960 smart people

00:44:34.700 have run for office,

00:44:36.260 but we haven't

00:44:37.820 seen a Fave.

00:44:39.660 Maybe not since

00:44:40.760 Thomas Jefferson

00:44:41.580 or Monroe

00:44:42.900 or something,

00:44:43.960 but,

00:44:44.360 or Hamilton.

00:44:46.320 But

00:44:46.840 he is the type

00:44:48.620 who can figure

00:44:50.880 out your whole

00:44:51.640 job

00:44:52.180 like while you're

00:44:54.160 getting coffee.

00:44:54.800 you haven't

00:44:57.620 seen this before,

00:44:58.540 so people,

00:44:59.040 people don't know

00:45:00.060 how to evaluate

00:45:01.300 him,

00:45:02.660 right?

00:45:03.460 Even if you don't

00:45:04.560 like his opinion

00:45:05.320 today,

00:45:06.160 and you say,

00:45:07.320 but your opinion

00:45:08.140 is under-informed

00:45:09.140 because there's this

00:45:09.940 thing I know

00:45:10.440 that you don't

00:45:10.920 know,

00:45:12.140 give him 10

00:45:13.140 more minutes.

00:45:14.560 Tell him the thing

00:45:15.240 that you know

00:45:15.720 that he doesn't

00:45:16.300 know,

00:45:17.280 and we're done

00:45:18.760 here,

00:45:19.300 and now he

00:45:19.760 knows it.

00:45:21.860 He's not like

00:45:22.780 other people.

00:45:23.380 He's not rejecting

00:45:25.000 opinions that

00:45:27.100 disagree with

00:45:27.740 him.

00:45:28.060 He's actually

00:45:28.740 considering them

00:45:30.300 and sometimes

00:45:30.980 even adjusting

00:45:31.940 from them,

00:45:32.900 and you're seeing

00:45:33.600 it in real time.

00:45:35.040 We've never

00:45:35.780 seen this before,

00:45:36.860 so comparing him

00:45:37.720 to other people

00:45:38.400 is just not

00:45:40.580 fair.

00:45:41.380 Well,

00:45:42.040 fair is the

00:45:42.440 wrong word.

00:45:43.140 It's not

00:45:43.720 useful.

00:45:45.680 Oh,

00:45:45.840 by the way,

00:45:47.620 Arnold Schwarzenegger

00:45:48.500 has a new

00:45:48.980 book.

00:45:51.140 The title of

00:45:51.860 the book is

00:45:52.260 Be Useful.

00:45:54.140 And apparently

00:45:54.680 that's his

00:45:55.800 advice.

00:45:57.320 It's his advice

00:45:58.040 book.

00:45:58.640 It's called

00:45:58.980 Be Useful.

00:46:00.340 Let me ask

00:46:01.120 you,

00:46:01.980 where have you

00:46:02.460 heard that

00:46:02.940 before?

00:46:04.340 Is there any

00:46:05.080 other advice

00:46:05.760 book that

00:46:07.500 had as a

00:46:08.300 key theme

00:46:09.280 to be

00:46:10.420 useful?

00:46:12.000 Yeah,

00:46:12.480 it's like the

00:46:12.920 main theme

00:46:13.440 of my book,

00:46:14.100 catafilled almost

00:46:14.760 everything and

00:46:15.280 still went

00:46:15.640 big.

00:46:17.000 And I

00:46:17.560 thought to

00:46:17.860 myself,

00:46:19.300 did his

00:46:19.700 ghost writer

00:46:21.320 just read my

00:46:22.060 book?

00:46:23.640 It's like

00:46:24.200 the title

00:46:24.600 of his

00:46:24.860 book.

00:46:26.460 As the

00:46:27.220 comments from

00:46:28.520 the people

00:46:28.860 who have read

00:46:29.160 my book are

00:46:29.660 telling you,

00:46:30.180 it's like a

00:46:30.840 main theme

00:46:31.340 of the

00:46:31.540 book.

00:46:32.140 I've never

00:46:32.720 heard anybody

00:46:33.100 say it

00:46:33.440 before I

00:46:33.820 did.

00:46:34.900 Because I've

00:46:35.520 been asked

00:46:35.900 in interviews,

00:46:37.560 you know,

00:46:37.760 can you sort

00:46:38.400 of summarize

00:46:38.940 your view

00:46:39.620 of success?

00:46:41.580 And my

00:46:41.960 view of how

00:46:42.420 to be

00:46:42.680 successful is

00:46:43.420 just those

00:46:43.860 two words.

00:46:45.040 Be useful.

00:46:46.400 Because your

00:46:47.000 entire value

00:46:48.220 to a

00:46:50.280 potential

00:46:50.660 mate,

00:46:51.280 to an

00:46:51.720 employer,

00:46:52.600 to your

00:46:53.220 friends,

00:46:54.360 to everybody

00:46:54.980 is be

00:46:56.860 useful.

00:46:57.560 If you're

00:46:58.160 trying to

00:46:58.700 be loved

00:46:59.380 because of

00:47:00.020 who you

00:47:00.380 are,

00:47:01.280 bad strategy,

00:47:03.720 you should be

00:47:04.400 loved for what

00:47:04.860 you do.

00:47:06.660 Right?

00:47:06.900 Just,

00:47:08.080 well,

00:47:08.560 maybe bad.

00:47:09.440 You know,

00:47:09.640 it might be

00:47:09.920 different for

00:47:10.340 women. 0.81

00:47:10.920 Women can 1.00

00:47:11.440 actually be

00:47:11.940 loved for

00:47:12.280 who they

00:47:12.560 are.

00:47:13.540 Men and

00:47:15.860 children can

00:47:16.340 be loved

00:47:16.640 for who

00:47:16.940 they are.

00:47:17.660 Men have 0.99

00:47:18.180 to perform.

00:47:20.000 Maybe he

00:47:20.560 makes that

00:47:21.060 distinction,

00:47:21.640 but I don't

00:47:21.940 know.

00:47:22.940 Anyway,

00:47:23.400 that was a

00:47:23.780 little aside.

00:47:28.440 I had a

00:47:29.520 little exchange

00:47:30.280 with an

00:47:32.640 Israeli

00:47:33.040 resident this

00:47:34.260 morning,

00:47:35.800 and I

00:47:39.460 don't know

00:47:39.640 how to even

00:47:40.060 approach this

00:47:40.720 topic without

00:47:41.780 getting canceled.

00:47:43.620 But let's

00:47:44.160 see if I can

00:47:44.800 couch it in

00:47:45.680 other people's

00:47:46.400 opinions.

00:47:47.560 Because it's

00:47:48.000 not my

00:47:48.380 opinion.

00:47:49.620 Would you

00:47:50.080 agree with

00:47:50.520 the following

00:47:50.900 statement that

00:47:51.840 the radical

00:47:53.660 Islamists will 1.00

00:47:55.620 use whatever

00:47:56.480 happens in

00:47:57.360 Gaza as a

00:48:00.020 propaganda

00:48:01.920 tool forever?

00:48:06.560 Forever.

00:48:08.520 They will use

00:48:09.360 it to recruit.

00:48:10.860 They will use

00:48:11.640 it to get

00:48:12.000 world sympathy.

00:48:12.940 They will use

00:48:13.320 it to get

00:48:13.700 money.

00:48:14.220 They will use

00:48:14.540 it to get

00:48:14.900 power.

00:48:15.680 What does

00:48:16.800 that sound

00:48:17.260 like?

00:48:21.240 I'm going

00:48:21.880 to get

00:48:22.080 canceled right

00:48:22.680 now.

00:48:23.660 I know I

00:48:24.160 am.

00:48:25.960 All right.

00:48:27.340 Here's what

00:48:28.020 I'm not

00:48:28.400 doing.

00:48:30.680 The next

00:48:31.500 things I

00:48:32.040 say are

00:48:35.440 not comparing.

00:48:36.700 I'm not

00:48:37.380 going to do

00:48:37.720 that.

00:48:38.220 There will

00:48:38.460 be no

00:48:38.780 comparing.

00:48:39.220 there's no

00:48:41.160 moral

00:48:41.480 equivalence.

00:48:42.240 There's no

00:48:43.240 moral equivalence.

00:48:43.340 There's no

00:48:46.760 apologist.

00:48:48.180 I'm not

00:48:48.880 being an

00:48:49.280 apologist for

00:48:50.500 anything.

00:48:51.780 I'm going to

00:48:52.480 tell you what

00:48:53.020 other people are

00:48:53.980 going to do and

00:48:54.680 think.

00:48:55.440 This is not

00:48:56.020 me.

00:48:56.840 I'm just

00:48:57.520 predicting what

00:48:58.220 other people are

00:48:58.900 going to do and

00:48:59.320 think.

00:49:00.940 Israel is

00:49:01.780 handing Hamas 0.90

00:49:02.700 their own

00:49:03.340 Holocaust. 0.77

00:49:03.820 And they

00:49:06.960 have no

00:49:07.420 idea what

00:49:09.000 it's going to

00:49:09.440 cost them in

00:49:10.540 the long run.

00:49:12.480 Now, I

00:49:13.420 want to be as

00:49:13.880 clear as

00:49:14.320 possible.

00:49:15.380 There isn't

00:49:16.180 really any

00:49:16.700 alternative to

00:49:17.540 what they're

00:49:17.840 doing.

00:49:19.360 I can't

00:49:20.100 think of

00:49:20.360 one.

00:49:20.860 And they

00:49:21.220 have a

00:49:21.640 complete right

00:49:22.500 to self

00:49:23.020 defense.

00:49:24.480 Complete

00:49:24.880 right.

00:49:26.060 That is

00:49:26.760 unquestioned.

00:49:28.320 And I can

00:49:29.140 see nothing

00:49:29.840 else they

00:49:30.340 can do except

00:49:31.420 exactly what

00:49:32.140 they're doing.

00:49:32.460 if it were

00:49:34.200 my country,

00:49:36.260 100% on

00:49:37.220 board.

00:49:38.140 Now, I

00:49:38.860 don't have to

00:49:39.340 take a moral

00:49:40.300 or ethical

00:49:41.040 stand about

00:49:42.100 something that

00:49:43.300 is only going

00:49:43.840 to happen one

00:49:44.420 way.

00:49:45.460 It would be

00:49:46.200 like taking a

00:49:46.860 moral and

00:49:47.300 ethical stand

00:49:48.040 against the

00:49:48.640 rain.

00:49:49.740 The rain is

00:49:50.660 just going to

00:49:51.160 rain.

00:49:52.520 It's just

00:49:53.200 cause and

00:49:53.580 effect.

00:49:54.260 I don't

00:49:54.900 take moral

00:49:55.560 stands against

00:49:56.480 cause and

00:49:57.100 effect.

00:49:58.140 When Hamas 0.89

00:49:59.120 came into

00:50:00.040 Israel and did 0.84

00:50:00.740 what they did,

00:50:01.360 they destroyed

00:50:02.720 Gaza.

00:50:04.380 But I think

00:50:05.260 they probably

00:50:05.740 knew it.

00:50:07.500 And I think

00:50:07.940 maybe the

00:50:08.460 bigger plan

00:50:09.140 is to

00:50:09.800 destroy

00:50:10.200 Gaza, 1.00

00:50:11.740 kill their 1.00

00:50:12.620 own people, 1.00

00:50:13.280 martyr them, 0.82

00:50:14.020 martyr as

00:50:14.500 many of

00:50:14.860 their citizens

00:50:15.400 as they

00:50:15.780 can,

00:50:16.780 to try to

00:50:17.660 get something

00:50:18.740 that would

00:50:19.240 be the

00:50:19.600 equivalent of

00:50:20.540 the Israeli

00:50:21.340 superpower,

00:50:22.800 which is

00:50:23.380 the Holocaust 0.82

00:50:23.980 narrative.

00:50:25.860 Now,

00:50:26.780 I'm not

00:50:27.920 comparing them.

00:50:29.240 This is not

00:50:29.820 me comparing

00:50:30.500 them.

00:50:31.200 I'm telling

00:50:31.660 you what

00:50:31.980 other people

00:50:32.560 are going

00:50:32.820 to compare.

00:50:34.000 Because if

00:50:34.600 you're

00:50:34.760 Palestinian,

00:50:36.260 it's going

00:50:36.660 to feel

00:50:36.920 like a

00:50:37.220 Holocaust to 0.76

00:50:37.820 you,

00:50:39.060 right?

00:50:40.120 It's not a

00:50:40.940 fair comparison,

00:50:42.240 but it's

00:50:42.600 sure going

00:50:42.900 to feel

00:50:43.160 like one.

00:50:44.680 So,

00:50:45.460 I asked

00:50:46.920 my smart

00:50:48.660 friend from

00:50:49.400 Israel,

00:50:50.740 you realize

00:50:51.400 that you're

00:50:52.320 giving them

00:50:53.860 their own

00:50:54.200 Holocaust, 0.55

00:50:54.800 right?

00:50:55.000 and he

00:50:56.920 said that

00:50:57.500 he hadn't

00:50:58.080 talked to

00:50:58.460 anybody who

00:50:59.080 had that

00:51:00.860 concept in

00:51:02.080 their mind.

00:51:04.080 Did you?

00:51:05.820 You could

00:51:06.420 all see it,

00:51:06.940 right?

00:51:08.000 Is it a

00:51:08.420 blind spot

00:51:09.020 for the

00:51:09.560 Israeli

00:51:09.820 citizens?

00:51:10.480 Because they

00:51:10.880 just know

00:51:11.280 they have

00:51:11.600 to do

00:51:11.800 what they

00:51:12.020 have to

00:51:12.260 do.

00:51:13.300 And,

00:51:13.680 you know,

00:51:14.500 there's no

00:51:15.140 way you

00:51:15.400 could convince

00:51:15.920 them that

00:51:16.900 anybody would

00:51:17.440 see this

00:51:17.840 like the

00:51:18.160 Holocaust. 0.77

00:51:18.420 but I

00:51:19.760 feel like

00:51:20.220 they might

00:51:21.280 be in a

00:51:21.620 little bubble

00:51:22.160 there.

00:51:23.620 Because I

00:51:24.220 think outside

00:51:25.020 of their

00:51:25.540 bubble,

00:51:26.920 the Islamists 0.95

00:51:28.900 are going to

00:51:29.620 make a lot

00:51:30.120 of hay with

00:51:30.600 that.

00:51:33.600 You think

00:51:34.240 they get it?

00:51:34.760 I don't

00:51:34.980 think so.

00:51:36.980 I don't

00:51:37.260 think so.

00:51:38.100 Now,

00:51:38.540 let me close

00:51:39.140 this by saying

00:51:39.840 I'm not

00:51:40.660 comparing it

00:51:41.580 to the

00:51:41.980 Holocaust. 0.77

00:51:43.020 I'm not

00:51:43.680 being an

00:51:44.060 apologist

00:51:44.560 for Hamas.

00:51:45.740 I want

00:51:46.120 them all 1.00

00:51:46.460 destroyed.

00:51:48.420 And I'm

00:51:50.740 also not

00:51:51.100 making moral

00:51:51.640 equivalents.

00:51:52.740 I'm not

00:51:53.080 doing that.

00:51:53.900 I'm just

00:51:54.320 making sort

00:51:55.500 of a

00:51:55.760 military

00:51:56.220 observation.

00:51:59.760 So,

00:52:00.460 in theory,

00:52:01.280 when Israel

00:52:02.800 is done,

00:52:04.380 if done

00:52:05.100 is even

00:52:05.460 a word

00:52:05.740 here,

00:52:06.680 with whatever

00:52:07.580 happens in

00:52:08.320 Gaza,

00:52:09.420 it should

00:52:10.000 make their

00:52:10.580 security

00:52:11.080 situation

00:52:11.780 much,

00:52:12.440 much worse

00:52:13.140 in the

00:52:14.640 long run.

00:52:15.880 Do you

00:52:16.520 think so?

00:52:18.420 Am I

00:52:20.200 wrong about

00:52:20.600 that?

00:52:21.800 Because it's

00:52:22.440 an interesting

00:52:23.040 trap that

00:52:24.160 Hamas set

00:52:25.060 for them,

00:52:26.120 and the

00:52:26.480 trap is

00:52:27.100 that they

00:52:28.460 have to

00:52:28.880 do what

00:52:29.200 they have

00:52:29.540 to do,

00:52:30.120 and I

00:52:30.520 agree with

00:52:30.940 it completely,

00:52:32.260 but it's

00:52:33.140 going to

00:52:33.360 cost them

00:52:33.920 more than

00:52:35.240 they can

00:52:35.520 imagine.

00:52:37.100 How can

00:52:37.700 it get

00:52:37.940 worse?

00:52:39.520 How can

00:52:40.120 it get

00:52:40.340 worse?

00:52:40.740 Have you

00:52:41.020 seen the

00:52:41.460 crowds in

00:52:42.160 Jordan trying

00:52:42.860 to cross

00:52:43.300 the border

00:52:43.680 to join

00:52:44.140 the fight?

00:52:45.320 It can

00:52:45.920 get worse

00:52:46.460 by bringing

00:52:47.120 more people

00:52:47.720 in who

00:52:48.060 are willing

00:52:48.420 to run

00:52:48.920 toward

00:52:49.340 Tel Aviv

00:52:50.580 shouting

00:52:51.660 death to

00:52:52.580 everybody?

00:52:54.740 The thing

00:52:55.560 that gets

00:52:55.880 worse is

00:52:56.460 more people

00:52:57.000 on the

00:52:57.540 side of

00:52:57.940 the bad

00:52:58.260 guys,

00:52:58.580 that's all.

00:52:59.440 That's the

00:53:00.520 whole game

00:53:00.900 here.

00:53:02.740 Well,

00:53:03.240 if you

00:53:03.540 are spending

00:53:03.960 any time

00:53:04.500 online,

00:53:05.160 you know

00:53:05.500 that the

00:53:06.100 situation in

00:53:07.720 the Middle

00:53:07.940 East has

00:53:08.360 turned into,

00:53:09.420 I hate to

00:53:09.940 say this,

00:53:11.120 and I don't

00:53:11.580 mean this to

00:53:12.300 make light

00:53:12.780 of it,

00:53:13.840 but if you

00:53:14.460 look at the

00:53:15.540 news coming

00:53:16.060 out of Gaza

00:53:16.660 from the

00:53:17.820 people who

00:53:18.340 are supporting

00:53:19.240 Gaza,

00:53:20.680 it's turned

00:53:22.200 into a

00:53:22.580 dead baby

00:53:23.020 contest.

00:53:24.580 They are

00:53:25.320 literally

00:53:25.800 competing to

00:53:27.540 see who can

00:53:28.100 show the

00:53:28.540 most horrific

00:53:29.220 images of

00:53:30.880 actual dead

00:53:31.800 babies.

00:53:33.300 It literally

00:53:34.420 became a

00:53:35.280 dead baby

00:53:36.120 persuasion

00:53:36.920 contest.

00:53:38.700 Man, if

00:53:39.340 there was

00:53:39.660 ever a time

00:53:40.340 to take a

00:53:40.840 time off

00:53:41.320 from social

00:53:42.340 media.

00:53:42.700 it's the

00:53:44.380 worst thing

00:53:44.820 I've ever

00:53:45.260 seen,

00:53:46.200 by far.

00:53:48.900 Would you

00:53:49.240 agree?

00:53:49.860 I've never

00:53:50.320 seen anything

00:53:51.020 even close

00:53:52.700 to how bad

00:53:53.900 this is.

00:53:56.000 I'm talking

00:53:56.740 about the

00:53:57.120 way it's

00:53:57.600 being reported

00:53:59.300 and how

00:53:59.820 social media

00:54:00.320 is handling

00:54:00.800 it.

00:54:01.380 But the

00:54:01.800 images that

00:54:03.520 I wish I

00:54:04.900 could never

00:54:05.320 see,

00:54:07.880 I can never

00:54:08.780 unsee.

00:54:09.280 my brain

00:54:11.900 is actually

00:54:12.360 scarred.

00:54:14.760 The initial

00:54:15.600 story is about

00:54:16.360 the 40

00:54:17.480 beheaded

00:54:18.000 babies, 0.99

00:54:19.320 which we're

00:54:19.860 still trying to

00:54:20.480 figure out

00:54:20.860 what is and

00:54:21.380 is not

00:54:21.760 true,

00:54:22.280 but obviously

00:54:22.860 it was a

00:54:24.080 horror of

00:54:24.880 unspeakable

00:54:26.060 magnitude,

00:54:26.940 no matter

00:54:27.260 what the

00:54:27.620 details were.

00:54:29.200 But even

00:54:30.780 no matter

00:54:31.580 how much of

00:54:32.180 that was

00:54:32.580 exactly true

00:54:33.400 and how

00:54:33.700 much of

00:54:34.020 it was

00:54:34.400 directionally

00:54:35.120 true,

00:54:36.020 I have

00:54:36.760 a whole

00:54:37.420 movie in

00:54:38.000 my head

00:54:38.540 of the

00:54:39.880 thing that

00:54:40.600 may or

00:54:41.480 may not

00:54:41.800 have

00:54:41.940 happened

00:54:42.200 the way

00:54:42.520 it was

00:54:42.760 described.

00:54:44.600 Do you

00:54:45.160 have the

00:54:45.420 same

00:54:45.580 problem?

00:54:46.820 I mean,

00:54:47.260 I can't

00:54:47.740 get that

00:54:48.080 out of

00:54:48.260 my head,

00:54:48.980 no matter

00:54:50.380 how exactly

00:54:51.400 true or

00:54:52.060 generally

00:54:52.700 true it

00:54:53.160 was.

00:54:54.820 So,

00:54:55.580 I mean,

00:54:56.000 that just

00:54:56.380 lives in

00:54:57.040 there.

00:54:57.500 And now

00:54:57.860 I'm seeing

00:54:58.180 the images

00:54:58.620 coming out

00:54:59.100 of Gaza,

00:54:59.860 I'm never

00:55:00.820 going to

00:55:01.120 forget them.

00:55:02.660 I spent

00:55:03.420 just like

00:55:04.160 a few

00:55:04.660 minutes,

00:55:05.860 just a few

00:55:06.900 minutes,

00:55:07.300 and I

00:55:07.920 got in

00:55:08.620 the wrong

00:55:08.880 place.

00:55:09.500 You know,

00:55:09.640 I hit a

00:55:10.020 hashtag I

00:55:10.620 shouldn't

00:55:10.800 have hit

00:55:11.080 and boom. 0.96

00:55:13.360 And wow,

00:55:14.640 I don't

00:55:15.700 think I'll

00:55:16.000 ever be the

00:55:16.440 same,

00:55:16.740 honestly.

00:55:17.440 I think

00:55:17.820 that I

00:55:18.980 feel like

00:55:19.360 I have

00:55:19.640 brain

00:55:19.880 damage,

00:55:21.440 actual

00:55:22.180 physical

00:55:23.400 brain

00:55:23.840 damage

00:55:24.300 from

00:55:25.140 looking at

00:55:25.560 those

00:55:25.760 pictures

00:55:26.120 because

00:55:26.900 I'm not

00:55:28.660 the same.

00:55:30.020 It turned

00:55:30.520 me into

00:55:30.820 something

00:55:31.120 else.

00:55:31.500 anyway,

00:55:35.080 what else

00:55:37.540 is going

00:55:37.860 on?

00:55:39.800 Here's a

00:55:40.520 weird story

00:55:41.160 that Israel

00:55:42.300 bombed the

00:55:42.960 only Planned

00:55:43.640 Parenthood

00:55:44.300 building in

00:55:45.380 Gaza.

00:55:47.200 Now,

00:55:47.840 I'm no

00:55:48.140 military

00:55:48.700 expert,

00:55:49.460 but that

00:55:50.820 feels like

00:55:51.420 opposite of

00:55:52.700 their

00:55:52.840 objectives.

00:55:55.080 AOC

00:55:55.660 had a

00:55:56.200 tweet or

00:55:57.700 a post

00:55:58.180 that somebody

00:55:59.900 said she

00:56:00.320 deleted,

00:56:01.280 that she

00:56:01.760 was blaming

00:56:02.340 Israel's 0.75

00:56:05.420 attack of

00:56:06.040 Gaza as,

00:56:07.220 well,

00:56:07.500 not the

00:56:07.780 attack,

00:56:08.140 but the

00:56:08.400 turning off

00:56:08.920 the water

00:56:09.320 and the

00:56:09.700 electricity

00:56:10.140 and starving

00:56:10.680 them as

00:56:11.160 collective

00:56:11.620 punishment,

00:56:12.400 which would

00:56:13.280 technically be

00:56:13.960 a war

00:56:14.280 crime.

00:56:17.680 Before I

00:56:18.420 talk about

00:56:18.860 this,

00:56:20.140 I need to

00:56:20.800 mention that

00:56:22.560 I'm not

00:56:23.200 going to be

00:56:23.540 comparing.

00:56:24.260 I'm not

00:56:24.520 going to be

00:56:24.860 making a

00:56:25.280 moral equivalence.

00:56:26.160 I'm not an

00:56:26.580 apologist.

00:56:27.500 Okay.

00:56:28.560 You have to

00:56:29.240 say that

00:56:29.640 every time

00:56:30.140 you talk.

00:56:33.100 But is

00:56:33.820 it?

00:56:34.560 What is

00:56:35.080 the technical

00:56:35.840 answer to

00:56:36.620 the question?

00:56:37.780 Is it a

00:56:38.300 war crime

00:56:38.920 to turn

00:56:41.620 off facilities

00:56:42.380 to the

00:56:42.920 public

00:56:43.400 because you're

00:56:45.340 after a

00:56:45.840 small subset

00:56:46.480 of the

00:56:46.840 public?

00:56:49.360 Now,

00:56:49.900 what would

00:56:50.240 not make

00:56:50.780 that a

00:56:51.080 war crime?

00:56:51.500 It is

00:56:51.780 collective

00:56:52.160 punishment,

00:56:52.760 right?

00:56:55.500 Yes,

00:56:55.940 Russia.

00:56:57.740 But maybe

00:56:59.140 war is

00:56:59.720 always

00:56:59.980 collective

00:57:00.600 punishment.

00:57:02.020 Yeah,

00:57:02.380 Hiroshima.

00:57:03.000 How is

00:57:03.600 Hiroshima not

00:57:04.300 a war

00:57:04.620 crime?

00:57:05.820 Because it

00:57:06.360 was mostly

00:57:07.260 citizens,

00:57:08.880 right?

00:57:09.260 99%

00:57:10.040 of citizens.

00:57:11.060 How is

00:57:11.320 that not

00:57:11.720 a war

00:57:12.060 crime?

00:57:12.260 I guess I

00:57:13.920 don't understand

00:57:14.500 what makes

00:57:14.940 something a

00:57:15.360 war crime.

00:57:16.440 So,

00:57:16.880 somebody says

00:57:17.520 that her

00:57:18.600 post was

00:57:19.140 taken down.

00:57:19.960 It might

00:57:20.300 be because

00:57:21.560 she learned

00:57:22.180 it wasn't

00:57:22.600 a war

00:57:22.920 crime.

00:57:24.000 I just

00:57:24.620 don't know

00:57:24.920 where the

00:57:25.200 line is.

00:57:25.740 maybe I'll

00:57:27.340 do a

00:57:27.720 little

00:57:27.820 research

00:57:28.320 on where

00:57:29.160 the line

00:57:29.580 is.

00:57:30.740 Well,

00:57:31.020 today is

00:57:31.440 the so-called

00:57:31.920 day of

00:57:32.380 rage,

00:57:33.580 which some

00:57:35.020 media outlets

00:57:35.800 have called

00:57:36.200 the day of

00:57:36.660 protest.

00:57:39.460 Do you

00:57:40.080 think there

00:57:40.460 will be

00:57:40.760 violence in

00:57:41.560 the United

00:57:41.840 States

00:57:42.140 today?

00:57:42.960 People who

00:57:43.620 are supporting

00:57:44.160 the Palestinians

00:57:45.340 or maybe

00:57:45.960 even supporting

00:57:46.600 Hamas? 0.90

00:57:51.160 Some say

00:57:51.900 yes.

00:57:52.260 well,

00:57:55.140 there will

00:57:55.280 be protests.

00:57:56.420 Apparently,

00:57:56.920 the White

00:57:57.220 House is

00:57:57.680 putting up

00:57:58.240 gates of

00:57:59.220 security.

00:58:01.420 I wonder

00:58:02.100 why.

00:58:03.860 Why would

00:58:04.800 you put up

00:58:05.180 security around

00:58:05.920 the White

00:58:06.260 House for

00:58:07.760 this, but

00:58:08.400 you didn't

00:58:08.720 do much

00:58:09.120 security for

00:58:09.860 January 6th?

00:58:11.220 Well,

00:58:11.560 that's an

00:58:12.500 interesting

00:58:12.900 question for

00:58:13.520 later.

00:58:19.220 Bongino

00:58:19.660 says it's

00:58:20.200 fake, the

00:58:20.740 day of

00:58:21.040 rage, and

00:58:21.520 the real

00:58:21.800 one will

00:58:22.120 come

00:58:22.300 later.

00:58:23.320 Well, I

00:58:23.900 think there

00:58:24.200 might be

00:58:24.540 lots of

00:58:24.880 real ones

00:58:25.280 coming

00:58:25.920 later.

00:58:28.600 Yeah.

00:58:29.980 You know,

00:58:30.600 the advantage

00:58:31.620 that the

00:58:32.100 United States

00:58:32.660 has, and

00:58:33.920 it's a big

00:58:34.280 one, is

00:58:35.000 that we're

00:58:35.380 large.

00:58:37.180 So you

00:58:37.960 can introduce

00:58:38.960 a thousand

00:58:40.660 people into

00:58:41.300 Israel, and

00:58:42.580 they could

00:58:42.840 bring the

00:58:43.200 country to

00:58:43.640 its knees.

00:58:45.620 If you

00:58:46.260 introduced a

00:58:46.900 thousand people

00:58:47.660 in America,

00:58:49.900 they would

00:58:51.300 be spread

00:58:51.900 out, or

00:58:53.260 they'd be

00:58:53.580 in one

00:58:53.860 place where

00:58:54.320 the military

00:58:54.880 would just

00:58:55.380 zap them. 0.94

00:58:57.160 So it

00:58:57.640 kind of, the

00:58:58.600 geography doesn't

00:58:59.960 work so well,

00:59:01.140 but obviously

00:59:01.720 there could be

00:59:02.180 unlimited terror

00:59:02.960 attacks.

00:59:03.460 Yeah, there

00:59:03.760 could be

00:59:04.000 unlimited

00:59:04.420 9-11s.

00:59:06.400 Nothing would

00:59:07.260 stop that.

00:59:08.980 But it's not

00:59:09.820 so much a

00:59:10.360 bunch of

00:59:10.600 people running

00:59:11.180 at you with

00:59:11.720 guns yelling.

00:59:12.920 That's not so

00:59:13.960 much going to

00:59:14.400 happen here.

00:59:14.820 take out one

00:59:25.880 school or

00:59:26.520 sporting event.

00:59:27.620 Yeah, that's

00:59:28.200 probably what

00:59:28.680 they'll do.

00:59:31.180 All right, do

00:59:32.200 you think

00:59:32.480 anything will

00:59:33.120 happen in

00:59:35.260 America because

00:59:36.240 of this

00:59:36.860 situation?

00:59:37.320 I feel

00:59:42.600 like, I

00:59:43.520 feel like

00:59:43.980 wokeness

00:59:44.720 won't go

00:59:46.320 away, but

00:59:47.360 it's taken

00:59:47.780 quite a

00:59:48.180 blow.

00:59:48.920 And I

00:59:49.500 also feel

00:59:50.060 that the

00:59:50.860 anti-woke

00:59:51.680 people are

00:59:52.800 getting a

00:59:53.500 lot braver.

00:59:55.060 Is that my

00:59:55.920 imagination?

00:59:57.340 I mean, the

00:59:58.340 things that I'm

00:59:58.980 seeing being

00:59:59.620 said in public

01:00:00.620 are things you

01:00:01.300 couldn't say

01:00:01.820 one year ago.

01:00:03.740 Would you

01:00:04.400 agree?

01:00:04.620 things you

01:00:05.900 could not

01:00:06.440 say in

01:00:06.860 public one

01:00:07.800 year ago,

01:00:08.580 people are

01:00:09.160 saying unreservedly

01:00:11.120 in public.

01:00:12.560 And that's

01:00:13.460 a big, I

01:00:14.160 think that's a

01:00:14.880 step in the

01:00:15.300 right place.

01:00:16.760 It might

01:00:17.480 mostly be

01:00:18.120 because the

01:00:18.600 X platform

01:00:19.340 is the

01:00:20.320 last fashion

01:00:21.220 of free

01:00:21.540 speech.

01:00:22.600 But I

01:00:24.920 feel like

01:00:25.300 something's

01:00:25.660 changing.

01:00:28.440 Feels like

01:00:29.280 something's

01:00:29.780 changing.

01:00:32.160 You know,

01:00:32.780 there's a

01:00:33.140 French teacher

01:00:34.240 who got

01:00:34.680 stabbed and

01:00:35.580 somebody got

01:00:36.100 stabbed over

01:00:36.640 there, but

01:00:36.900 I don't

01:00:37.100 know.

01:00:37.860 That could 0.68

01:00:38.220 have been

01:00:38.440 just a 0.94

01:00:38.760 crazy person. 0.94

01:00:42.540 Yeah, the 0.54

01:00:43.160 stock market

01:00:43.800 has been weird,

01:00:44.620 hasn't it?

01:00:46.280 Let's check it

01:00:46.980 right now.

01:00:49.700 Well, it's

01:00:50.340 down.

01:00:52.980 Looks like

01:00:53.580 it's broadly

01:00:54.100 down.

01:00:56.700 Except for

01:00:57.320 makeup.

01:00:58.460 Makeup is

01:00:59.040 up.

01:01:01.060 Ulta.

01:01:03.080 All right.

01:01:04.240 Aren't

01:01:05.400 all

01:01:05.600 terrorists 1.00

01:01:06.000 crazy 0.94

01:01:06.380 people?

01:01:07.000 Well, I

01:01:08.800 don't know

01:01:09.020 if they

01:01:09.220 started that

01:01:09.880 way, but

01:01:10.380 they might

01:01:10.740 have been

01:01:11.760 brainwashed

01:01:12.820 into it.

01:01:13.980 I'm not

01:01:14.320 sure if

01:01:14.600 brainwashed

01:01:15.100 is the

01:01:15.440 same as

01:01:15.740 crazy.

01:01:21.500 Oh, is

01:01:21.880 it

01:01:22.060 Chachin? 0.99

01:01:22.880 Okay.

01:01:25.640 Well, here's

01:01:26.440 what won't

01:01:29.260 win you the

01:01:29.860 election in

01:01:30.440 2024.

01:01:31.040 I'm going

01:01:32.420 to take

01:01:32.780 away your

01:01:33.480 rifles.

01:01:34.960 I don't

01:01:35.580 think that

01:01:35.980 wins the

01:01:36.380 election.

01:01:39.460 I don't

01:01:40.320 understand how

01:01:41.120 Trump isn't

01:01:41.980 up compared

01:01:43.160 to Biden

01:01:43.660 by 20

01:01:44.660 points.

01:01:46.360 It's really

01:01:47.220 baffling that

01:01:47.980 this looks

01:01:48.780 like it'll be

01:01:49.320 close.

01:01:50.440 It's just

01:01:50.860 really baffling.

01:01:51.620 Well, I

01:01:55.740 would say

01:01:56.080 this

01:01:56.500 unreservedly

01:01:58.100 and without

01:01:58.960 hyperbole.

01:02:00.620 In 2024,

01:02:01.920 you're going

01:02:02.200 to be voting

01:02:02.660 for your

01:02:03.060 life in

01:02:05.740 ways that I

01:02:06.840 don't think

01:02:07.220 has ever been

01:02:07.800 the case.

01:02:08.920 Because if we

01:02:09.840 don't get a

01:02:10.340 president who

01:02:10.860 will close

01:02:11.260 the border,

01:02:12.620 we will be 0.83

01:02:13.740 dead.

01:02:15.280 I think

01:02:15.960 that's a

01:02:16.300 given.

01:02:16.880 And not

01:02:17.260 because of

01:02:17.820 Hispanics

01:02:18.460 coming over.

01:02:19.020 they're not

01:02:20.860 really the

01:02:21.300 problem.

01:02:25.960 They'll never

01:02:26.620 let it

01:02:26.920 happen.

01:02:30.180 I don't

01:02:30.780 think Trump

01:02:31.240 is up more

01:02:31.720 than 20.

01:02:32.880 I don't

01:02:33.460 think that's

01:02:33.860 real.

01:02:36.540 Yeah, Trump

01:02:37.320 is going to

01:02:37.680 have to have

01:02:38.220 like an

01:02:38.900 enormous

01:02:39.540 organic lead

01:02:41.180 on election

01:02:42.380 day or else

01:02:43.360 nobody's going

01:02:43.900 to believe the

01:02:44.320 result if he

01:02:44.940 doesn't win.

01:02:47.140 The most

01:02:47.860 dangerous thing

01:02:48.500 that could 0.68

01:02:48.740 happen

01:02:48.940 in the

01:02:49.240 country is

01:02:49.980 Trump losing

01:02:51.180 in a close

01:02:52.560 race when

01:02:54.080 the polls

01:02:54.520 said it

01:02:54.920 wouldn't be

01:02:55.280 close.

01:02:57.440 And we

01:02:58.020 might be

01:02:58.340 heading for

01:02:58.700 that.

01:02:59.460 That would

01:02:59.860 be really

01:03:00.480 bad.

01:03:04.440 All right.

01:03:05.440 Ladies and 0.98

01:03:05.960 gentlemen, I'm

01:03:06.560 going to close

01:03:06.940 down the

01:03:07.640 feed over

01:03:08.360 here for

01:03:09.040 YouTube and

01:03:09.820 Twitter.

01:03:10.180 Thanks for

01:03:10.520 joining.

01:03:10.900 Sorry about

01:03:11.260 the technical

01:03:11.900 problem.

01:03:13.240 I will see

01:03:14.240 you tomorrow.

01:03:16.380 go.

01:03:25.020 Bye.

01:03:25.500 Bye.

01:03:25.680 Bye.

01:03:28.400 Bye.

01:03:29.100 Bye.

01:03:29.560 Bye.

01:03:33.440 Bye.

01:03:33.760 Bye.

01:03:34.380 Bye.

01:03:35.340 Bye.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - October 13, 2023

Episode 2260 Scott Adams： Coffee With Scott 10⧸13⧸2023

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript