Real Coffee with Scott Adams - November 06, 2023


Episode 2284 Scott Adams: CWSA 11⧸06⧸23, Grok And All The Headlines Too, With Coffee


Episode Stats


Length

1 hour and 4 minutes

Words per minute

143.7928

Word count

9,294

Sentence count

639

Harmful content

Misogyny

13

sentences flagged

Hate speech

28

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode of Coffee with Scott Adams, Scott Adams talks about a new kind of coffee robot, a windsurfer who just hit a whale, and why he doesn t need a car to get back to the grocery store.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 Do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do.
00:00:03.440 Roo-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p-p freelance. 1.00
00:00:09.860 I'll even put it on the microphone for the YouTube people, because that's how much I love you.
00:00:16.200 Yeah.
00:00:16.860 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the finest thing that ever happened in your life.
00:00:23.760 It's called Coffee with Scott Adams, and I don't believe civilization has ever experienced
00:00:28.480 say things like this before and wherever it will.
00:00:31.300 And if you'd like to take it up to
00:00:32.520 levels that only
00:00:34.080 AI can even understand, all you need
00:00:36.520 is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or
00:00:38.520 chalice or a stein, a canteen jug or
00:00:40.600 a flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:43.200 Fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:00:44.660 I like coffee. And join me now
00:00:46.560 for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine
00:00:48.300 at the end of the day, the thing that makes everything better. It's called
00:00:50.460 the Simultaneous Sip.
00:00:52.440 And it happens now. Go.
00:00:54.040 Oh, that's good.
00:01:00.140 You know, I can't wait to have a
00:01:02.420 coffee robot.
00:01:04.140 It's nice to have a coffee machine
00:01:06.620 that makes your coffee for you.
00:01:08.940 That's okay, sure.
00:01:12.000 But I still have to stand up and walk over
00:01:14.480 and get it. And then
00:01:16.300 walk all the way back. Where is
00:01:18.360 my coffee robot?
00:01:20.160 Can I make a prediction?
00:01:21.380 The following
00:01:24.100 prediction.
00:01:26.260 In three years,
00:01:27.920 I'll be doing this show,
00:01:30.840 you know, just like today,
00:01:32.360 except while you're watching me,
00:01:34.780 my Tesla
00:01:36.020 robot will bring
00:01:38.080 me a cup of coffee while
00:01:39.960 I'm live. Anybody want to take
00:01:41.980 a bet? Do you want to take
00:01:43.940 a bet that my Tesla robot
00:01:45.980 will bring me my coffee
00:01:47.540 while you're watching on a live stream
00:01:49.860 within three years?
00:01:52.140 Anybody want to take that bet?
00:01:54.100 What a time
00:01:55.620 to be alive.
00:01:57.080 Are you kidding me?
00:01:59.200 A hundred
00:01:59.860 thousand years of human evolution
00:02:01.940 and you get to be alive
00:02:04.220 when the frickin'
00:02:06.120 sentient robot
00:02:06.940 brings you coffee.
00:02:09.000 That is amazing.
00:02:10.980 We actually
00:02:11.820 have flying cars.
00:02:13.560 Now, they only last
00:02:14.440 20 minutes on a charge
00:02:15.960 or whatever it is.
00:02:16.720 but we do have
00:02:18.340 flying cars.
00:02:19.940 There is actually
00:02:20.840 a business called
00:02:22.180 the Jetson One
00:02:23.640 for
00:02:25.200 a hundred
00:02:25.600 thousand dollars
00:02:26.420 sell you
00:02:27.560 a 20-minute ride
00:02:28.760 you know,
00:02:29.480 per charge.
00:02:31.600 Now, I couldn't buy
00:02:33.020 a hundred
00:02:33.540 thousand dollar
00:02:34.340 flying car.
00:02:37.500 Here's why.
00:02:40.220 20 minutes?
00:02:42.060 I don't know about you
00:02:42.920 but my personality
00:02:43.940 would make me panic
00:02:45.060 one minute in.
00:02:46.840 I only got 19 minutes
00:02:47.940 to get back?
00:02:48.720 How am I going to get
00:02:49.500 this car back?
00:02:50.600 I'd be flying
00:02:52.020 and looking at my
00:02:52.820 watch,
00:02:53.940 my Apple watch
00:02:54.660 I guess
00:02:54.980 at the same time.
00:02:57.460 15 minutes?
00:02:58.300 Oh God,
00:02:58.820 oh God,
00:02:59.280 I got to get back.
00:03:00.180 Oh,
00:03:00.740 I only have 10 minutes.
00:03:02.200 I only have 10 minutes.
00:03:03.200 So for me
00:03:03.840 it would be a
00:03:04.440 five-minute charge
00:03:05.940 because after five minutes
00:03:07.740 I'd be like
00:03:08.200 I'm getting back.
00:03:08.920 I'm getting back.
00:03:09.600 I don't even know
00:03:10.380 if these dials are correct.
00:03:11.540 I don't want to be up here
00:03:12.240 when this battery stops.
00:03:13.820 So,
00:03:14.380 it's not quite
00:03:15.600 where I need it.
00:03:17.240 I still look at
00:03:18.120 an electric car
00:03:18.940 with a 350-mile range
00:03:20.840 and I tell myself
00:03:21.620 I'm not comfortable
00:03:23.500 with that
00:03:23.860 going to the grocery store.
00:03:26.180 I'm not even joking.
00:03:28.120 Like it would actually
00:03:28.820 give me anxiety
00:03:29.640 that my electric car
00:03:31.160 only had a charge
00:03:32.020 of 300 miles.
00:03:34.140 I can barely deal
00:03:35.700 with a gas engine.
00:03:37.260 It's like,
00:03:37.640 all right,
00:03:38.040 full tank.
00:03:39.420 I think I can make it
00:03:40.320 to the corner
00:03:40.800 and back.
00:03:42.220 It's just a personal thing.
00:03:44.000 Well,
00:03:44.540 in the big news
00:03:45.580 I'll start with
00:03:46.200 the little news
00:03:46.760 and work to the big news
00:03:47.680 if you don't mind.
00:03:48.320 Get you warmed up
00:03:49.240 beginning of the week.
00:03:51.320 There was a windsurfer
00:03:52.460 who was hit by a whale.
00:03:54.920 They say it was
00:03:55.500 a one-in-a-million accident.
00:03:57.920 And he had his,
00:03:58.440 here's the funny thing,
00:03:59.400 he had some kind of
00:04:00.120 a GoPro
00:04:00.620 or something filming it
00:04:02.120 so you could actually see,
00:04:04.280 you know,
00:04:04.680 his windsurfer thing
00:04:06.960 going forward on a,
00:04:08.520 I guess that's what
00:04:09.300 it's called,
00:04:09.740 when you have like
00:04:10.200 a surfboard
00:04:11.800 with a parachute.
00:04:13.760 I mean,
00:04:15.080 that's either
00:04:15.660 for attacking Israel 0.52
00:04:16.780 or it's some kind
00:04:18.260 of surfboarding thing,
00:04:19.120 right?
00:04:20.260 Could have two purposes.
00:04:22.020 But he hits his whale
00:04:23.400 and he gets like
00:04:24.080 a really clean picture
00:04:25.180 of the whale.
00:04:28.840 So,
00:04:29.560 one in a million,
00:04:31.040 whale hits a windsurfer
00:04:32.700 and he gets a really
00:04:34.080 clean image of it.
00:04:36.000 Still,
00:04:38.540 no good clean images
00:04:39.980 of a UFO.
00:04:42.660 That's where I was
00:04:43.520 going with this.
00:04:44.820 We also have the
00:04:45.860 sighting of a
00:04:47.580 one-in-a-million
00:04:48.300 an albino moose.
00:04:50.600 That was,
00:04:51.180 I think,
00:04:51.680 last week or so.
00:04:53.260 Albino moose.
00:04:54.340 Nice,
00:04:55.040 clear picture
00:04:55.780 of an albino moose.
00:04:58.180 Still no picture
00:04:59.120 of a UFO.
00:05:00.780 Not a clean one.
00:05:02.620 So,
00:05:03.060 I guess that's just chance.
00:05:05.300 All right.
00:05:06.380 My next episode
00:05:07.440 I call
00:05:08.080 Backward Science.
00:05:10.300 Backward Science! 0.94
00:05:13.440 That's where
00:05:14.200 studies get the
00:05:15.160 correlation backwards.
00:05:16.300 Maybe.
00:05:17.280 But I'm going to teach
00:05:18.200 you a new trick
00:05:18.980 on this one.
00:05:21.560 Here's the headline.
00:05:23.220 Regular exercise
00:05:24.060 helps people
00:05:24.940 avoid the need
00:05:25.780 for antidepressants.
00:05:28.280 Pretty good.
00:05:29.700 That sounds like
00:05:30.460 a good positive
00:05:31.320 development.
00:05:32.140 But also,
00:05:32.820 it feels like
00:05:33.320 you already knew
00:05:33.840 that, right?
00:05:34.340 Don't you feel
00:05:35.960 like you already
00:05:36.500 knew that?
00:05:37.340 Well,
00:05:37.580 it turns out
00:05:38.040 that there's
00:05:38.460 some ambiguity
00:05:39.000 in the science.
00:05:41.320 It's not obvious
00:05:42.520 that exercise
00:05:43.280 does help everybody
00:05:44.340 because,
00:05:46.200 and I'm going to
00:05:46.640 compliment the
00:05:47.460 study people,
00:05:48.720 they say directly
00:05:49.700 that they were
00:05:51.500 very conscious
00:05:52.180 that the correlation
00:05:53.900 might work
00:05:54.440 the other way.
00:05:55.780 They were very
00:05:56.320 conscious that
00:05:57.080 it could be
00:05:57.620 that if you're
00:05:58.220 depressed,
00:05:59.100 you're less likely
00:06:00.260 to go to the gym.
00:06:00.980 doesn't that
00:06:02.320 make sense?
00:06:03.380 So the correlation
00:06:04.320 between who's
00:06:05.300 happy and who's
00:06:05.920 exercising
00:06:06.500 might be a
00:06:07.160 backwards correlation,
00:06:08.540 but here's the
00:06:09.520 good news.
00:06:10.420 They designed
00:06:11.100 the test
00:06:11.760 to control
00:06:13.280 for that.
00:06:14.600 So they took
00:06:15.420 people who were
00:06:16.120 not on any
00:06:16.760 kind of medicine,
00:06:17.820 they said this
00:06:18.700 random group
00:06:19.360 will exercise,
00:06:20.340 this random
00:06:20.760 group will not,
00:06:22.740 and the group
00:06:23.420 that exercised
00:06:24.100 had better outcomes.
00:06:26.060 Now,
00:06:26.560 what was wrong
00:06:27.180 with this study?
00:06:28.480 Well,
00:06:29.160 here's the title
00:06:29.920 of this,
00:06:30.320 here's the headline.
00:06:32.480 Most people are
00:06:33.200 just going to read
00:06:33.680 the headline,
00:06:34.200 right?
00:06:35.140 Realistically.
00:06:36.260 Here's the headline.
00:06:37.380 Listen to the
00:06:38.200 exact wording.
00:06:39.860 Regular exercise
00:06:40.780 helps people avoid
00:06:42.000 the need for
00:06:42.560 antidepressants.
00:06:44.320 That's the headline.
00:06:45.620 Now,
00:06:45.900 let's hear the
00:06:47.000 exact words
00:06:47.820 of what the
00:06:48.240 study participant
00:06:49.020 or the study
00:06:49.980 author said.
00:06:53.640 Um,
00:06:54.160 ba-ba-ba-ba-ba.
00:06:55.520 Uh,
00:06:55.960 the authors
00:06:58.720 actually say,
00:06:59.920 or is it the
00:07:00.600 people who have
00:07:01.580 these mental
00:07:02.240 conditions
00:07:02.820 exercise less
00:07:04.140 often?
00:07:05.220 Boom.
00:07:06.120 So they had
00:07:06.580 actually,
00:07:07.180 you know,
00:07:07.740 controlled the
00:07:08.320 study for that.
00:07:09.280 Good work.
00:07:09.940 Good work.
00:07:11.280 But,
00:07:11.720 um,
00:07:12.640 here's what the
00:07:13.260 study authors
00:07:13.840 concluded from
00:07:14.900 their own study.
00:07:16.840 In their words,
00:07:18.360 uh,
00:07:18.800 exercise was
00:07:19.840 likely helping
00:07:21.000 to prevent
00:07:22.040 conditions from
00:07:23.060 manifesting.
00:07:23.880 In other words,
00:07:24.440 it was likely
00:07:25.840 helping to
00:07:27.560 keep you from
00:07:28.460 having your
00:07:29.880 actual depression.
00:07:31.860 Now,
00:07:32.120 does likely
00:07:33.260 helping match
00:07:34.600 the headline?
00:07:35.760 Regular exercise
00:07:36.720 helps people
00:07:37.540 avoid the need
00:07:38.240 for antidepressants.
00:07:40.440 No.
00:07:41.680 No,
00:07:42.260 likely is
00:07:42.860 different from
00:07:43.480 it does.
00:07:45.660 Likely,
00:07:46.280 likely is
00:07:47.240 the correct
00:07:48.720 scientific
00:07:50.020 interpretation.
00:07:52.260 Scientists
00:07:52.740 got it
00:07:53.200 right.
00:07:54.480 Uh,
00:07:54.800 the
00:07:54.980 causality
00:07:56.700 getting
00:07:56.980 backwards,
00:07:57.800 scientists
00:07:58.260 got it
00:07:58.740 right.
00:07:59.920 So the
00:08:00.340 scientists
00:08:00.720 got everything
00:08:01.380 right,
00:08:02.220 except that
00:08:03.140 it was a,
00:08:03.740 I think it
00:08:04.040 was a small
00:08:04.560 study group.
00:08:06.560 Um,
00:08:07.700 well,
00:08:07.920 actually,
00:08:08.180 that's the
00:08:08.420 next one.
00:08:09.220 Uh,
00:08:09.500 but then
00:08:09.980 the,
00:08:10.360 but then
00:08:10.940 the,
00:08:11.320 uh,
00:08:11.860 journalist
00:08:12.340 turned it
00:08:13.120 wrong.
00:08:14.880 So be
00:08:15.560 careful of
00:08:16.060 that.
00:08:16.480 The
00:08:16.620 scientists
00:08:16.980 can get
00:08:17.480 everything
00:08:17.820 right,
00:08:18.520 and the
00:08:19.120 journalist
00:08:19.480 can just
00:08:19.900 write a,
00:08:20.520 or the
00:08:20.860 editor,
00:08:21.520 can write
00:08:22.500 a headline
00:08:22.960 that just
00:08:23.380 doesn't match
00:08:23.900 the story.
00:08:24.960 And if you
00:08:25.480 didn't read,
00:08:26.660 and where
00:08:27.100 was the
00:08:27.540 part about
00:08:28.360 likely?
00:08:30.160 How far
00:08:30.700 in the
00:08:31.040 article do
00:08:31.540 you have
00:08:31.720 to read
00:08:32.200 before you
00:08:33.100 get to
00:08:33.380 the word,
00:08:33.920 well,
00:08:34.120 it's likely
00:08:34.580 it helps.
00:08:35.740 The last
00:08:36.240 paragraph.
00:08:37.320 The last
00:08:38.100 paragraph
00:08:38.560 negates
00:08:39.160 the,
00:08:39.620 the headline.
00:08:40.760 In fact,
00:08:41.420 as a
00:08:42.040 practice,
00:08:42.980 this is
00:08:43.860 what you
00:08:44.180 should do.
00:08:44.900 If it's
00:08:45.440 anything about
00:08:46.060 a scientific
00:08:46.780 study,
00:08:48.120 you should
00:08:48.740 read the
00:08:49.120 first paragraph
00:08:50.340 because that
00:08:50.740 tells you
00:08:51.040 what it
00:08:51.300 did.
00:08:52.360 Always
00:08:52.800 skip to
00:08:53.480 the last
00:08:53.920 paragraphs,
00:08:54.920 last two
00:08:55.500 paragraphs.
00:08:56.500 Always look
00:08:57.160 at them,
00:08:57.680 because that's
00:08:58.120 where they'll
00:08:58.540 hide the,
00:08:59.080 well,
00:08:59.280 we didn't
00:08:59.560 really mean
00:08:59.980 it,
00:09:00.260 probably
00:09:00.480 doesn't
00:09:00.740 mean
00:09:00.880 anything.
00:09:02.360 All right,
00:09:02.680 here's another
00:09:03.080 one that's
00:09:03.620 not backward
00:09:04.240 science.
00:09:06.680 A study
00:09:07.220 said that
00:09:07.740 those who
00:09:08.120 consumed
00:09:08.680 high-quality
00:09:10.200 olive oil
00:09:10.920 experienced a
00:09:12.600 significant
00:09:13.100 reduction in
00:09:13.840 blood pressure.
00:09:15.160 Well,
00:09:15.300 that's good
00:09:15.640 news,
00:09:16.840 right?
00:09:17.140 And I
00:09:18.060 think they
00:09:18.460 did the
00:09:19.340 study in
00:09:20.260 the right
00:09:20.580 way.
00:09:21.660 They picked
00:09:22.080 people and
00:09:22.820 randomly selected
00:09:23.820 them and gave
00:09:25.320 some the olive
00:09:25.940 oil and some
00:09:26.700 not, and by
00:09:27.180 the way, it
00:09:27.460 only works with
00:09:28.160 a high-end
00:09:28.840 olive oil that
00:09:29.580 has some
00:09:30.840 specific stuff
00:09:31.760 in it that's
00:09:32.520 good for you,
00:09:33.060 I guess.
00:09:34.440 I didn't write
00:09:34.880 down what it
00:09:35.360 is.
00:09:35.860 But here's
00:09:36.260 what's wrong
00:09:37.100 with the
00:09:37.440 study.
00:09:38.880 They studied
00:09:39.460 50 people.
00:09:42.320 Would you
00:09:42.780 ever alter
00:09:45.480 your life
00:09:46.100 because there
00:09:46.980 was a
00:09:47.300 scientific study
00:09:48.120 with 50
00:09:48.640 people in
00:09:49.120 it?
00:09:50.080 You should
00:09:50.460 probably not.
00:09:52.760 That's way 0.98
00:09:53.380 too small.
00:09:54.380 That's what
00:09:54.700 you call an 0.64
00:09:55.180 underpowered
00:09:55.800 study.
00:09:56.820 It doesn't
00:09:57.220 mean they're
00:09:57.600 wrong.
00:09:58.640 I'm not
00:09:58.920 saying they're
00:09:59.320 wrong.
00:10:00.120 I'm just
00:10:00.500 saying it's
00:10:00.920 underpowered.
00:10:02.460 So that's
00:10:04.080 what you
00:10:04.400 should learn.
00:10:05.080 Look for
00:10:05.640 the last
00:10:06.340 paragraph
00:10:06.800 negating the
00:10:07.800 title, and
00:10:08.880 then look for
00:10:09.400 the number
00:10:09.820 of participants.
00:10:11.320 Those are
00:10:11.600 two things
00:10:12.060 you should
00:10:12.340 look for
00:10:12.680 right away.
00:10:13.080 However, as
00:10:16.120 I often tell
00:10:16.880 you, when it
00:10:17.980 comes to your
00:10:18.500 own diet and
00:10:19.320 fitness, you
00:10:20.560 should be a
00:10:21.060 continuous
00:10:21.520 experimenter.
00:10:23.280 So since I'm
00:10:23.880 actually working
00:10:25.180 on getting my
00:10:25.840 blood pressure
00:10:26.380 down, I'll
00:10:28.540 test this.
00:10:30.400 I'll actually
00:10:30.920 just see what
00:10:31.420 happens.
00:10:32.300 Because I think
00:10:32.840 it's maybe like a
00:10:33.860 teaspoon of olive
00:10:34.780 oil a day or
00:10:35.460 something like
00:10:35.880 that.
00:10:36.680 Maybe.
00:10:38.100 I can't imagine
00:10:39.680 it would hurt
00:10:40.280 me to do a
00:10:41.800 little more
00:10:42.160 olive oil,
00:10:42.820 right?
00:10:43.960 So there's no
00:10:44.680 downside.
00:10:45.660 I can just
00:10:46.080 test it for a
00:10:46.720 month, see if
00:10:47.360 I see any
00:10:47.760 difference.
00:10:50.820 All right.
00:10:53.080 Remember how I
00:10:54.000 told you that
00:10:55.460 the opposite, I
00:10:58.400 didn't make this
00:10:59.000 up, it was
00:10:59.920 something I saw
00:11:00.500 from somebody
00:11:00.980 else, that the
00:11:02.080 opposite of
00:11:02.720 addiction is
00:11:03.420 human connection.
00:11:05.460 It's not a
00:11:06.200 sobriety.
00:11:07.300 That if you have
00:11:07.840 human connection,
00:11:08.840 your need for
00:11:09.380 addiction goes
00:11:10.020 way down.
00:11:11.360 Now this explains
00:11:12.340 several things
00:11:13.340 which have
00:11:15.780 always been
00:11:16.220 puzzles to me.
00:11:17.480 And I'm not
00:11:17.880 positive that I
00:11:18.880 have this factually
00:11:19.780 right, but tell
00:11:20.420 me if you've
00:11:20.860 heard this before.
00:11:22.760 After Vietnam, 0.78
00:11:24.540 there were a
00:11:24.920 number of people
00:11:25.500 who were hooked
00:11:26.180 on heroin while
00:11:27.280 they were over
00:11:27.660 there because they
00:11:28.240 kind of needed it
00:11:29.280 to get through the
00:11:29.860 day, who came
00:11:31.320 back to the
00:11:31.780 United States and
00:11:33.100 allegedly, I need a
00:11:34.260 fact check on
00:11:34.880 this, but it's been
00:11:36.000 reported that they
00:11:37.380 had very little
00:11:38.200 effort in just
00:11:39.660 getting off of
00:11:40.520 heroin.
00:11:41.840 Does that sound
00:11:42.680 familiar?
00:11:43.360 Have you ever
00:11:43.740 heard that?
00:11:44.720 That people coming
00:11:45.460 back with heroin
00:11:46.160 addictions just
00:11:47.120 got off it like
00:11:48.580 it was nothing.
00:11:49.880 Now, what does
00:11:50.780 that tell you?
00:11:51.620 Like, what was it
00:11:52.440 about being home
00:11:53.360 other than not
00:11:54.580 being scared to be
00:11:55.440 killed every minute?
00:11:57.020 But you should
00:11:58.000 have been physically
00:11:58.820 addicted.
00:12:00.020 It shouldn't have
00:12:00.560 mattered that the
00:12:01.220 reason you started
00:12:02.100 was no longer
00:12:03.380 valid.
00:12:04.220 The drug itself
00:12:05.200 should have done
00:12:05.700 what the drug
00:12:06.200 does and make you
00:12:06.920 addicted.
00:12:07.220 But here's what's
00:12:09.120 different.
00:12:10.200 When you come
00:12:10.880 home, you
00:12:11.520 probably re-engage
00:12:12.760 socially.
00:12:14.240 You become
00:12:15.060 connected again to
00:12:16.160 your family and
00:12:17.400 your community.
00:12:19.360 So, again,
00:12:21.080 there's something
00:12:21.580 that's, you
00:12:22.260 know, anecdotally,
00:12:23.760 is very consistent
00:12:24.800 with that idea that
00:12:25.920 human connection is
00:12:27.060 a direct replacement
00:12:28.020 for addiction.
00:12:30.100 But I came up
00:12:31.020 with another
00:12:31.500 example.
00:12:33.660 You may have
00:12:34.480 seen me do a
00:12:35.100 video of this.
00:12:35.700 It's kind of
00:12:36.100 funny.
00:12:36.340 My dog
00:12:37.440 Snickers refuses
00:12:39.320 to eat her
00:12:40.400 regular food,
00:12:41.680 which is, at
00:12:42.300 this point, it's
00:12:43.300 a high-end,
00:12:44.360 you know, moist
00:12:45.280 food.
00:12:47.000 She's on a
00:12:47.700 special diet, but
00:12:48.400 she likes that
00:12:48.920 food.
00:12:50.900 But she will not
00:12:52.120 eat that if I'm
00:12:53.740 awake and home.
00:12:56.260 If I'm in the
00:12:57.000 house, she will 0.91
00:12:58.380 follow me every
00:12:59.060 time I get my
00:12:59.680 coffee, because
00:13:00.320 it's, you know,
00:13:01.060 in the same place
00:13:01.700 as the treats,
00:13:02.640 and she'll beg for
00:13:03.660 treats.
00:13:04.020 And I thought
00:13:05.500 the other day
00:13:05.980 when I was
00:13:06.300 thinking about
00:13:06.720 this addiction
00:13:07.420 versus connection
00:13:08.380 thing, that she's 1.00
00:13:10.320 just begging for
00:13:10.960 treats all day
00:13:11.580 long.
00:13:12.640 And I said to
00:13:13.520 myself, that's
00:13:14.160 basically an
00:13:14.860 addiction.
00:13:16.300 She's addicted to 1.00
00:13:17.200 treats.
00:13:18.220 And I thought,
00:13:19.000 what if I try to
00:13:19.920 give her a human 0.99
00:13:20.960 connection instead
00:13:22.620 of a treat?
00:13:24.240 So since she can't
00:13:25.360 have infinite treats,
00:13:26.540 you know, I give
00:13:28.080 her a few, but,
00:13:28.880 you know, I keep
00:13:29.440 it in a reasonable
00:13:30.960 diet-friendly
00:13:31.840 amount.
00:13:33.880 And so instead,
00:13:35.580 I go over and
00:13:36.320 give her some 0.98
00:13:36.820 attention.
00:13:37.980 Like, give her
00:13:38.400 some real direct
00:13:39.260 attention.
00:13:39.980 Petting her, making
00:13:40.920 sure I'm touching
00:13:41.600 her, giving her my
00:13:42.860 full attention for,
00:13:43.860 like, a minute.
00:13:45.120 And she seems just
00:13:46.220 as happy.
00:13:47.220 And she walks
00:13:47.820 away like...
00:13:51.440 And she walks
00:13:52.980 away like she'd
00:13:55.000 had a treat.
00:13:55.460 And I thought,
00:13:58.160 does this explain
00:13:59.120 everything?
00:14:00.920 Like, have we
00:14:01.860 literally cured
00:14:02.820 addiction?
00:14:04.580 Like, could you
00:14:05.240 take somebody as
00:14:06.060 an experiment and
00:14:08.200 just say, all
00:14:09.480 right, we're going
00:14:09.900 to experiment on
00:14:10.700 you?
00:14:12.240 You know, you can
00:14:13.380 live with this cool
00:14:14.560 family who's really
00:14:16.220 warm and they'll
00:14:17.020 love you and
00:14:17.780 see what happens.
00:14:20.260 Just see what
00:14:21.060 happens.
00:14:21.640 You wonder if you
00:14:22.880 could hug an
00:14:23.900 addict out of it.
00:14:25.460 Like, literally.
00:14:27.160 Imagine if you
00:14:27.940 were an addict, but
00:14:29.600 once a day, a
00:14:31.000 bunch of cool
00:14:31.920 strangers could
00:14:32.720 come up to you
00:14:33.460 and just give you
00:14:34.140 like a warm
00:14:34.720 embrace.
00:14:37.380 Probably cure
00:14:38.240 you.
00:14:39.080 I don't know.
00:14:40.280 Anyway, we're
00:14:41.380 monitoring this
00:14:42.220 space.
00:14:43.360 In other news,
00:14:44.540 Vivek Ramaswamy was
00:14:45.660 on CNN, which is
00:14:46.660 always fun.
00:14:48.260 I don't think
00:14:49.120 anybody has done
00:14:50.080 a better job
00:14:50.980 getting interviewed
00:14:52.760 on CNN than
00:14:54.020 Vivek Ramaswamy.
00:14:55.460 If you've seen
00:14:56.260 him, I think
00:14:56.760 you'd agree.
00:14:58.060 Because the
00:14:58.740 thing he does
00:14:59.260 better than
00:14:59.720 anybody is he
00:15:01.380 sticks to the
00:15:02.140 part, he sticks
00:15:03.440 to the Republican,
00:15:04.840 let's say,
00:15:06.320 philosophy, without
00:15:08.080 saying things that
00:15:09.020 are batshit crazy,
00:15:10.920 which is sort of
00:15:11.540 hard to do.
00:15:13.360 You know what I
00:15:14.120 mean?
00:15:15.160 It's hard to say
00:15:16.120 things that even
00:15:17.840 the Democrats would
00:15:19.040 agree are factually
00:15:20.120 true.
00:15:20.500 But he does
00:15:21.800 that.
00:15:22.100 So he was being
00:15:24.980 accosted by Jim
00:15:26.080 Acosta.
00:15:27.540 I never realized
00:15:28.780 why that was his
00:15:29.660 name before.
00:15:31.460 So Jim is actually
00:15:32.300 the person who
00:15:32.880 accosts people,
00:15:34.600 like at press
00:15:35.480 events.
00:15:37.800 His name is
00:15:38.280 actually Jim
00:15:39.360 Acosta.
00:15:41.200 Anyway, so Jim
00:15:43.040 was interviewing
00:15:43.780 Vivek, and here
00:15:46.600 was the important
00:15:47.620 topic that Jim
00:15:49.320 Acosta thought
00:15:50.660 that Vivek should
00:15:51.780 respond to.
00:15:53.600 Think about all
00:15:54.620 the things happening
00:15:55.340 in the world, and
00:15:57.140 here's what Jim
00:15:57.900 Acosta asked Vivek
00:15:59.120 to respond to.
00:16:00.920 That Trump had
00:16:01.800 called the people
00:16:03.440 in jail over the
00:16:04.400 January 6th
00:16:05.680 charges, he
00:16:06.860 referred to them
00:16:07.600 as hostages,
00:16:10.060 you know, at the
00:16:10.620 same time that
00:16:11.300 there were hostages
00:16:12.120 in Gaza.
00:16:14.140 So that was the
00:16:15.940 important thing.
00:16:17.620 that Jim Acosta
00:16:18.460 needed to talk to
00:16:19.420 Vivek about.
00:16:21.900 So how did
00:16:22.900 Vivek handle that?
00:16:26.200 Quote from
00:16:28.200 Vivek, let me be
00:16:29.400 clear about what's
00:16:30.300 irresponsible as it
00:16:31.720 relates to coverage
00:16:32.560 of Donald Trump.
00:16:33.720 From the Russia 0.93
00:16:34.360 collusion hoax that
00:16:35.420 never was to the
00:16:36.360 Hunter Biden laptop
00:16:37.240 story, I think the
00:16:38.620 real accountability
00:16:39.260 here belongs to the
00:16:40.360 media.
00:16:42.700 Perfect.
00:16:44.700 Literally
00:16:45.260 perfect.
00:16:46.120 Now, imagine
00:16:47.860 what he could have
00:16:48.460 done, right?
00:16:49.900 He stuck with
00:16:50.740 Russia collusion
00:16:52.120 hoax because nobody
00:16:53.020 doubts that that
00:16:54.320 didn't pan out, and
00:16:55.940 the Hunter Biden
00:16:56.740 laptop story, we
00:16:57.720 know the truth of
00:16:58.360 that.
00:16:58.880 So he didn't go into
00:17:00.060 anything that would
00:17:01.180 allow Jim Acosta to
00:17:02.440 say, oh, that one
00:17:03.960 thing you mentioned is
00:17:05.020 questionable.
00:17:06.300 He just kept it a
00:17:07.180 thing you can't really
00:17:07.920 argue with.
00:17:09.000 I mean, if you're a
00:17:09.800 news person, you can't.
00:17:11.500 Citizens would.
00:17:12.240 Good job,
00:17:14.560 Favate.
00:17:17.140 There's a story that
00:17:18.340 said that Biden
00:17:20.260 doesn't know what
00:17:21.120 Bidenomics is and
00:17:22.120 nobody else does, but
00:17:23.060 it's the centerpiece of
00:17:24.000 his campaign.
00:17:26.360 If there were one
00:17:27.520 thing that would
00:17:28.340 explain everything
00:17:29.280 about the 2024
00:17:30.780 presidential election,
00:17:33.180 let me summarize.
00:17:34.740 The centerpiece of
00:17:36.180 Biden's campaign is
00:17:38.300 Bidenomics, and Biden
00:17:40.380 says directly he
00:17:41.400 doesn't know what
00:17:41.960 it is.
00:17:43.360 That's right.
00:17:44.540 He doesn't know how
00:17:45.460 to define Bidenomics
00:17:46.720 except something good,
00:17:48.940 something really good.
00:17:52.000 And that's it.
00:17:53.740 That's the centerpiece
00:17:54.780 of his campaign.
00:17:56.360 Now, it's not the
00:17:57.160 only part of his
00:17:57.860 campaign.
00:17:58.820 There's also the part
00:17:59.880 that is obviously
00:18:00.680 untrue.
00:18:02.000 You know, accusing
00:18:03.020 Trump of calling
00:18:04.180 racist, very fine
00:18:06.320 people.
00:18:06.760 Didn't happen.
00:18:07.900 He'll probably bring
00:18:08.640 up the drinking
00:18:09.220 bleach hoax.
00:18:10.380 Didn't happen.
00:18:11.540 Didn't happen.
00:18:13.540 Now, and see how
00:18:14.560 smart it is that
00:18:15.500 Vivek didn't mention
00:18:16.460 those two hoaxes?
00:18:18.040 Because those, Jim
00:18:19.100 could argue about.
00:18:20.460 I mean, not
00:18:20.940 successfully, but it
00:18:22.340 turns it into an
00:18:23.020 argument.
00:18:24.140 Vivek is smart enough
00:18:25.200 to know that he can
00:18:26.020 drop two little bombs
00:18:28.220 that even Acosta
00:18:30.280 won't go after, and
00:18:32.080 then bully his way
00:18:34.300 through.
00:18:34.720 It was perfect.
00:18:35.300 So, my understanding
00:18:39.280 is, I get very
00:18:40.820 confused in all the
00:18:41.860 Trump legal stuff.
00:18:43.960 So if I say something
00:18:44.840 that mixes two of the
00:18:46.700 cases together, will
00:18:48.860 you try to keep me
00:18:49.560 honest?
00:18:50.780 You know, keep me on
00:18:52.280 track here?
00:18:52.900 Because I'm very
00:18:53.660 confused about it all.
00:18:54.780 I think most non-lawyers
00:18:56.080 are pretty confused.
00:18:57.460 But my understanding is
00:18:58.720 that a judge has already
00:19:00.040 ruled that, what, he was
00:19:04.380 going to lose his
00:19:05.100 business license in
00:19:06.180 New York for, and the
00:19:08.160 example that's given in
00:19:09.660 the press is that Trump
00:19:12.500 claimed his townhouse in
00:19:15.540 Trump Tower was 33,000
00:19:17.820 square feet, but it was
00:19:19.620 really 11,000.
00:19:21.680 So far, is that correct?
00:19:24.540 That it's factually, it's
00:19:26.680 not 33,000, but that
00:19:29.520 there's evidence he claimed
00:19:30.920 it, and therefore that's
00:19:32.920 obvious fraud.
00:19:33.880 Per the judge, and
00:19:35.500 therefore they've lost
00:19:36.480 some kind of license to
00:19:37.920 operate in New York?
00:19:39.280 I mean, I imagine it'll be
00:19:40.260 appealed, but that's where
00:19:41.940 it sits right now.
00:19:44.760 Let me ask you this.
00:19:47.100 So from the outside,
00:19:48.460 everything just looks
00:19:49.280 confusing, and let me
00:19:51.500 give you an example.
00:19:53.780 When I tried to get fire
00:19:56.420 insurance for my house,
00:19:57.780 because it's bigger than a
00:20:01.020 normal house, do you think
00:20:03.260 that the insurance company
00:20:04.700 took my word for the
00:20:05.880 square footage?
00:20:08.800 They did not, because there
00:20:10.640 was a lot of money
00:20:11.200 involved.
00:20:12.340 And it's just, it was just
00:20:14.120 fire insurance.
00:20:15.420 But still, that's a lot of
00:20:16.600 money, you know, for a
00:20:19.160 normal residential situation.
00:20:20.840 So they sent somebody out
00:20:23.120 who spent an entire
00:20:24.640 morning with a measuring
00:20:26.440 device, measuring my house
00:20:28.060 and all its rooms.
00:20:30.320 Now, if you've ever bought
00:20:33.520 a house, do you take the
00:20:37.640 word of the seller for the
00:20:41.240 square footage, or do you
00:20:43.460 send somebody around who
00:20:44.820 looks at, you know, what's
00:20:46.460 broken and measures it, and
00:20:48.420 maybe does an assessment,
00:20:50.240 and checks the square
00:20:51.260 footage?
00:20:52.240 At least visually.
00:20:53.720 You know, at least, does
00:20:54.500 that look like it's about
00:20:55.460 that much?
00:20:56.500 Yes.
00:20:57.640 So even in my tiny little
00:20:59.540 residential world, nobody
00:21:02.160 ever, ever, ever takes
00:21:06.160 your word for square footage
00:21:07.760 if it's a reasonably large
00:21:10.820 deal.
00:21:12.020 Now, that's the size of my
00:21:13.600 house.
00:21:14.620 Now, imagine it's Trump
00:21:15.640 Tower.
00:21:16.020 Give me any scenario where
00:21:20.080 anybody who has to make an
00:21:21.340 important decision doesn't
00:21:24.180 check the square footage.
00:21:26.260 I've never heard of that.
00:21:28.180 Have you?
00:21:29.340 So there's something about
00:21:30.800 the story that we deeply
00:21:32.100 don't understand.
00:21:33.840 Is that a media failure?
00:21:36.780 Or was it there and I
00:21:38.580 missed it?
00:21:39.520 Because I could have missed
00:21:40.340 it.
00:21:40.700 It could be on me.
00:21:42.980 But who can answer the
00:21:44.160 question, why is this the
00:21:46.300 only case in recorded
00:21:48.020 history where something at
00:21:49.920 that dollar amount that
00:21:52.100 involved a physical asset?
00:21:54.200 This is the important part.
00:21:55.680 It's a physical asset.
00:21:58.020 Nobody doesn't check a
00:21:59.220 physical asset at that
00:22:01.160 dollar level.
00:22:02.900 That would be like somebody
00:22:03.980 buying an office building
00:22:05.100 without physically going
00:22:06.540 there.
00:22:07.540 I mean, that would be a
00:22:08.260 pretty rare, you know, you'd
00:22:09.440 at least send somebody to look
00:22:10.540 at it, who you trusted.
00:22:12.760 So correct me if I'm wrong,
00:22:15.040 there's just something
00:22:15.980 deeply essential to the
00:22:18.720 story that's missing, and
00:22:21.620 nobody's even telling you
00:22:22.660 it's missing until I just
00:22:24.440 told you.
00:22:24.960 How many of you noticed
00:22:26.160 that was missing in the
00:22:28.400 reporting?
00:22:29.920 Did anybody else notice?
00:22:31.960 Because, you know, I'm
00:22:32.600 always looking for the dog
00:22:33.480 that's not barking, so I'm
00:22:34.980 waiting for the part where
00:22:36.220 there was an assessor, for
00:22:38.820 example, you know, was there
00:22:40.480 ever part of the story where
00:22:41.480 an assessor walked through
00:22:42.620 and Trump said, oh, don't
00:22:44.480 measure it, I'll just take
00:22:45.980 my word for it.
00:22:46.940 Did that ever happen?
00:22:48.800 Is there any evidence of
00:22:50.120 that?
00:22:50.400 Because I feel like I would
00:22:51.160 have heard of that.
00:22:52.680 So where in the world did
00:22:53.920 the two estimates come from?
00:22:56.600 If I had to guess, and it's
00:22:58.520 only a guess, it would go
00:23:00.300 like this.
00:23:01.580 In the real world, things are
00:23:03.140 complicated, and there's
00:23:04.880 layers, and people talk to
00:23:06.940 people and forget what was
00:23:08.180 heard, and, you know, they
00:23:09.720 write things down wrong.
00:23:11.080 We live in this messy,
00:23:12.440 error-filled world.
00:23:13.940 Here's what I think probably
00:23:15.320 happened.
00:23:17.780 I think what probably
00:23:19.080 happened is that at one
00:23:22.140 point somebody believed it
00:23:23.540 would be 33,000, or at one
00:23:26.140 point it included a few other
00:23:27.720 floors, because that's three
00:23:29.740 floors, right?
00:23:31.140 11,000 to 33,000 are a
00:23:33.940 multiple of three.
00:23:34.700 Do you think it's a
00:23:36.340 coincidence that it's
00:23:37.980 exactly three?
00:23:40.040 Or do you think that at one
00:23:41.760 point Trump said, I'm going
00:23:45.140 to keep all three stories for
00:23:46.540 myself, but that he changed
00:23:49.420 his mind because he didn't
00:23:50.360 need that much space?
00:23:52.440 So that at one point, maybe
00:23:53.660 one point, there's a document
00:23:55.300 that said it was 33,000 square
00:23:57.620 feet, because maybe that's what 0.80
00:23:59.400 he planned it to be at some
00:24:00.500 point.
00:24:01.460 And then the accountants doing
00:24:02.940 what the accountants do, let
00:24:05.160 me tell you how my taxes are
00:24:07.140 done.
00:24:07.980 My accountant already knows my
00:24:09.980 base information, all the
00:24:12.700 basic stuff, it's the same
00:24:14.320 every year.
00:24:14.960 The only thing she does is
00:24:17.220 update with new information.
00:24:20.000 So I don't tell her every year
00:24:21.960 what the value of my house is,
00:24:24.540 that stuff.
00:24:25.120 I don't tell her every year the
00:24:28.200 size of my house and what
00:24:30.560 percentage is business use,
00:24:32.960 because part of my house I use
00:24:34.180 for my office here.
00:24:36.260 She takes what I said last time,
00:24:38.560 and unless I tell her something
00:24:39.920 new, she says it's still the
00:24:42.140 square footage.
00:24:43.260 And then she calculates based on
00:24:44.640 that.
00:24:45.260 So you don't update your
00:24:46.740 accountant on every piece of
00:24:48.200 information that's sort of your
00:24:50.000 base information.
00:24:51.200 You just tell them what changed.
00:24:52.400 So if at one point somebody like
00:24:55.980 an accountant had ever seen on a
00:24:57.820 document 33,000 square feet, they
00:25:00.680 would have just used it, just kept
00:25:02.600 using it.
00:25:04.460 So my best guess is what happened,
00:25:07.700 is that some document got
00:25:09.160 disconnected from reality at some
00:25:12.160 point, probably an innocent mistake,
00:25:15.560 and then it just perpetuated because
00:25:17.500 the principles don't go check all the
00:25:20.100 math all the time.
00:25:20.780 So that's not part of the process.
00:25:24.380 Just a guess, that in the real
00:25:26.520 world, it doesn't make sense that he
00:25:29.700 tripled it exactly.
00:25:32.000 You get that?
00:25:33.320 If it's an entire floor, that must be
00:25:36.220 what all floors are.
00:25:38.200 It must be that pretty much all floors
00:25:40.120 are around 11,000, at least in that
00:25:42.000 range of the building.
00:25:43.340 So he probably just thought he was
00:25:44.940 going to use three and use one.
00:25:47.020 That's probably all it was.
00:25:49.120 Never corrected it.
00:25:50.780 So, let's see.
00:25:58.560 So I've got questions there.
00:26:00.760 Now, I'm going to go hard at this
00:26:03.180 next point.
00:26:03.900 I've made it in a lighter way, but I'm
00:26:06.200 going to go a little harder.
00:26:08.600 So, as my understanding, the case
00:26:11.760 that involves Jack Smith has to do
00:26:16.200 with what Trump believed about the
00:26:18.300 election.
00:26:20.120 So, correct me if I'm wrong,
00:26:22.520 the charges against Trump depend
00:26:24.960 entirely, entirely, not just a little
00:26:28.220 bit, but the charges depend entirely
00:26:31.160 on him knowing that he had lost the
00:26:34.260 election.
00:26:34.740 Is that correct?
00:26:35.380 It depends entirely upon him knowing
00:26:40.640 that he lost the election, but acting like
00:26:43.000 he had won anyway.
00:26:45.560 Completely.
00:26:46.960 Now, if there's no evidence that he ever
00:26:51.940 told anybody that he believed it was fair,
00:26:55.940 how in the world could that be illegal?
00:26:58.120 It can't be.
00:27:01.620 And have you heard any hint that anybody
00:27:04.820 involved is going to testify,
00:27:07.420 oh, yeah, he told me directly he knows it was
00:27:10.300 a clean election.
00:27:11.520 And if he had said that, you don't think we'd
00:27:16.880 know about it by now?
00:27:19.240 You don't think anybody would have mentioned
00:27:21.400 that by now?
00:27:22.920 Well, you know, he told his lawyers.
00:27:25.660 Now, if you know anything about Trump's
00:27:28.280 personality, do you think he could have any
00:27:31.620 way of knowing the election was fair?
00:27:35.000 Given, you know, think about all the things
00:27:37.760 that you and I have seen that show that all
00:27:40.620 of our government institutions are corrupt
00:27:42.660 to some degree or other?
00:27:44.300 Pretty much all of them.
00:27:45.820 Now, that's what we've seen from the outside.
00:27:49.340 Imagine, just imagine the things that
00:27:52.600 Trump has seen, both as a private business
00:27:55.600 person working with the government,
00:27:58.120 plus being in power and seeing how things
00:28:01.440 really work behind the scenes.
00:28:04.560 Do you think a person with that experience
00:28:06.840 could say that all 50 states held a fair
00:28:10.400 election?
00:28:12.140 Nobody with that experience has that opinion.
00:28:15.980 Nobody.
00:28:17.120 There are people who might say it, because
00:28:19.020 it's good for them politically, but there
00:28:21.040 can't be any reasonable adult who says they
00:28:24.780 know that 50 elections were all done securely.
00:28:30.000 That is fundamentally unknowable.
00:28:34.080 It's unknowable.
00:28:35.340 And every day a Democrat will tell me it is
00:28:38.060 knowable because they didn't find anything.
00:28:40.880 No.
00:28:42.620 I think Democrats treat it like, you know,
00:28:45.500 they're looking in a cup.
00:28:47.100 And they're like, I'm looking in this cup,
00:28:51.440 and I can see the bottom of the cup.
00:28:53.120 So there's no, there's nothing in there
00:28:58.000 because I can see the bottom of the cup.
00:29:01.320 It's not really like looking in a cup.
00:29:04.860 You know what it's more like?
00:29:07.880 It's more like a needle in a haystack.
00:29:09.920 If somebody cheated intentionally, they
00:29:14.900 wouldn't do it so obviously that they could
00:29:17.300 get caught.
00:29:18.120 They would have a really good sense of what
00:29:20.300 things get caught and what things don't get
00:29:22.180 caught.
00:29:23.120 Because enough people have been caught that
00:29:25.260 they know what gets caught.
00:29:26.740 They know what things will obviously be caught,
00:29:29.080 so nobody would do that.
00:29:30.860 But are there any ways to cheat that you might
00:29:33.680 not get caught?
00:29:34.640 The answer is, of course.
00:29:36.460 Of course there are.
00:29:37.380 Probably lots of them.
00:29:41.660 Just because you can't name them doesn't
00:29:43.460 mean they don't exist.
00:29:44.500 Every complicated system has vulnerabilities.
00:29:49.560 So we have this absurdity that there's one
00:29:52.420 man in the world who could know the unknowable
00:29:54.720 about this complex web of systems that would
00:29:58.540 be more like a needle in a haystack.
00:30:00.460 So let me reword it.
00:30:02.680 The case hinges on Trump looking at a
00:30:06.960 haystack and knowing there's no needle in
00:30:10.260 it.
00:30:13.300 How is that analogy?
00:30:15.480 It depends on him knowing there's no
00:30:18.400 needle in it.
00:30:19.980 Now, I always tell you analogies are not
00:30:22.260 arguments.
00:30:23.480 They're only ways to make a point.
00:30:25.800 And this is one of those.
00:30:26.920 The argument doesn't require the analogy.
00:30:30.160 The argument is it's a big complicated
00:30:31.780 system.
00:30:32.800 How would anybody know what's happening in
00:30:34.460 that big complicated system?
00:30:36.540 By breaking it down to a comparison between
00:30:39.540 Democrats saying, hey, there's nothing in my
00:30:43.220 little cup, so it must be empty.
00:30:45.520 I'm telling you that it's not a simple system like
00:30:49.100 a cup.
00:30:50.120 You can't know it's empty by looking at it.
00:30:53.720 It's more like a complicated system, which I've
00:30:57.440 represented as a needle that's in a haystack.
00:30:59.780 So we have this actual situation where the
00:31:05.140 prosecution has to prove that with no evidence of
00:31:09.080 Trump ever saying it to anybody, apparently, they're
00:31:12.400 going to have to know what was in his head and to
00:31:14.560 know that in the context of Trump, knowing that every
00:31:18.140 government system is corrupt to some degree and knowing
00:31:22.000 that it has closed in about him particularly, knowing that it
00:31:25.660 accused him of being a killer and every single person who
00:31:28.600 believed it had a good reason to cheat him, that somehow he
00:31:32.840 could know, while he looks at this big pile of hay, that
00:31:36.520 there's not a needle in the middle of it, just by looking at
00:31:40.540 the hay.
00:31:42.640 And that's what the Democrats have been led to believe, that
00:31:47.140 you actually can look at a big pile of hay, and just by looking
00:31:51.200 at it from the outside, you know there's no needle on the
00:31:54.020 inside.
00:31:54.320 Why?
00:31:55.900 Because a few people dug around the edges and they didn't find
00:31:58.600 a needle.
00:32:00.160 Well, therefore.
00:32:02.540 Now, I hate to say this is an IQ problem, because I don't think
00:32:07.880 there's that much difference in IQ between political left and right.
00:32:11.740 At least, you know, not so much would make a difference here.
00:32:14.360 This clearly looks like brainwashing.
00:32:17.780 Clearly looks like that.
00:32:18.860 So, when I wrote a long thread on this, would you like to hear me
00:32:24.140 read the thread, because it says it perfectly?
00:32:26.640 Or would that just be a repeat?
00:32:29.560 Yes?
00:32:30.100 All right.
00:32:30.340 It's a better summary.
00:32:31.220 Let me do that.
00:32:32.400 So, here's what I posted today.
00:32:34.700 To find Trump guilty of inciting some kind of insurrection.
00:32:46.200 I forget what the charge is.
00:32:47.780 Is this the insurrection one?
00:32:50.120 I think it is, right?
00:32:53.080 To find Trump guilty of inciting some kind of insurrection.
00:32:56.860 Prosecutors have to show he knew the unknowable that the election was not
00:33:01.840 rigged.
00:33:03.660 That is literally unknowable.
00:33:07.660 And every serious adult who is not a Democrat understands it.
00:33:11.660 You all understand that, right?
00:33:13.520 Is there anybody who's confused about how you could know there's a needle in
00:33:17.660 the middle of the haystack?
00:33:18.500 No.
00:33:19.400 And so, I said, unless there's evidence Trump ever said the election was
00:33:22.340 clean, and nothing like that has been suggested, there's nothing to the case.
00:33:26.640 But worse, in the context of every one of our other major government
00:33:31.620 institutions being somewhat obviously corrupt, the odds of 50 separate state
00:33:36.500 elections being clean is close to zero.
00:33:40.460 Certainly over time.
00:33:42.400 But even now.
00:33:44.420 The absurdity level is off the chart.
00:33:46.620 Banana Republic stuff.
00:33:49.100 So, and then here's my speculation.
00:33:51.000 I said, the case against Trump has only gotten this far because Democrats don't
00:33:55.720 see the news that shows all of our other institutions being corrupt.
00:34:00.900 They still think everything about COVID was legit.
00:34:05.220 They think Putin got Trump elected.
00:34:08.260 They think Hunter's laptop was, they don't know Hunter's laptop was a hoax.
00:34:12.600 They think Joe wasn't involved in Hunter's businesses.
00:34:16.320 They think Trump called neo-Nazis fine people, and they think he recommended
00:34:19.800 drinking bleach.
00:34:21.840 That's what their news told them.
00:34:24.660 Their news told them that.
00:34:29.440 But best of all, Democrats have been duped into believing you can read the mind
00:34:33.440 of a stranger, Trump, and you can see that he clearly can see the unknowable.
00:34:39.320 So first you have to read his mind, and then while you're reading it,
00:34:42.860 you have to see that he knows something that can't be known.
00:34:46.460 Magic?
00:34:46.860 How would he know something that can't be known?
00:34:51.040 Or at least that he was lying, I suppose.
00:34:53.340 You can see that if you're a brain, if you're a mind reader.
00:34:58.580 So it's absurd and totally corrupt.
00:35:01.220 But I left this, what I called extra help for Democrats at the end of the post.
00:35:06.240 Because you know what the Democrats are going to say, right?
00:35:09.080 Do you know what every brainwashed Democrat would say to that post?
00:35:12.020 Well, I know what they're going to say, so that's why I left them a little helpful note
00:35:16.460 at the end.
00:35:17.500 It says, extra help for Democrats.
00:35:20.060 By the way, this is a good technique if you're posting.
00:35:23.400 If you know what the complaint will be, call it out.
00:35:29.420 It makes it funnier.
00:35:30.280 So I said, extra help for Democrats.
00:35:33.560 I do understand that no court has found evidence that would overturn the 2020 election.
00:35:38.520 That fact is not a counterpoint to anything I've written.
00:35:42.140 Rather, it is the method used to brainwash you.
00:35:45.000 How many people do you think still went into the comments and said,
00:35:51.200 Scott, it's been proven that the elections were good because nothing was found by the courts?
00:35:57.480 Oh, there will be a few.
00:35:59.260 There will be a few.
00:36:01.540 I don't know how many, but there'll be a few.
00:36:04.460 Nothing can stop them.
00:36:06.460 All right, here's some news that made me scratch my head.
00:36:09.980 NBC News, and this is important, because remember,
00:36:12.780 NBC News is what people who know more than I do say is sort of the in-house news,
00:36:20.400 meaning that the CIA and the government tells NBC what to say about political stuff.
00:36:26.780 That's what people say.
00:36:28.340 You know, I don't have personal knowledge of that.
00:36:30.940 But if you imagine that's true, because the people saying it are smart,
00:36:35.880 then put that context on this story.
00:36:38.460 So NBC News says that Muslims in Michigan, which is a key election state,
00:36:45.820 their support for Biden is cratering because of the Israeli and Hamas situation.
00:36:55.860 Does that make sense to you?
00:36:58.280 Does it make sense to you that Muslims would start losing their support for Biden?
00:37:04.600 Because doesn't the only thing that matters is whether they like the competition better?
00:37:11.420 So let me see if I can understand that.
00:37:13.640 You're a Muslim American, and you're trying to choose between Biden and Trump.
00:37:18.960 Biden and Trump both strongly support Israel, right?
00:37:24.240 Almost exactly the same amount, which is 10 out of 10, complete support.
00:37:28.520 So on that level, they should be a tie.
00:37:32.700 But Biden still lets your relatives immigrate and join you in America.
00:37:37.040 And maybe Trump won't.
00:37:39.460 How in the world is this even close?
00:37:44.320 You know, as much as I think Trump is a better candidate than Biden,
00:37:48.540 if I were a Muslim in America,
00:37:52.080 what's the argument for liking the guy who's going to give you less?
00:37:56.440 How does that, how do you even get there?
00:38:00.600 So here's what it makes me think.
00:38:03.100 I think if this had not been our current situation
00:38:05.820 where members of the government want to force Biden out of the race,
00:38:11.040 that they would have reported it differently.
00:38:14.120 How would it sound if NBC did not want to force Biden out of the race?
00:38:18.400 Let me tell you.
00:38:21.060 It goes like this.
00:38:22.340 That was it.
00:38:27.500 They wouldn't have mentioned it.
00:38:29.180 It wouldn't have been a story.
00:38:31.620 If they didn't want to put your brain in that space,
00:38:34.760 they just wouldn't mention it.
00:38:36.900 Here's an...
00:38:37.360 Suppose they did mention it,
00:38:38.940 but they didn't want you to think poorly of Biden.
00:38:42.020 How would they write it?
00:38:44.060 Here's how they would write it.
00:38:46.660 Support for Biden is cratering
00:38:48.880 because of the current situation.
00:38:50.680 However, when compared to a matchup with Trump,
00:38:56.260 they still don't...
00:38:57.460 You know, there's no reason to think
00:38:58.760 that they're going to like Trump better.
00:39:00.320 That would be the way to say it.
00:39:01.800 If the only thing they're doing is asking
00:39:03.880 how much do you like Biden,
00:39:05.800 it kind of doesn't matter.
00:39:08.360 Because the real question is,
00:39:09.520 how do you like Biden compared to the only alternative
00:39:11.800 you're likely to see?
00:39:13.840 Am I right?
00:39:14.620 So by moving the context from compared to Trump,
00:39:19.940 which looks like it shouldn't make any difference
00:39:22.100 in the election, really,
00:39:25.100 to moving it to what do you think about Biden by himself,
00:39:28.300 they can create an impression that Biden's in trouble
00:39:30.780 with a segment that could control one of the key states.
00:39:34.360 So to me, this looks like propaganda.
00:39:38.080 It doesn't look like news
00:39:39.500 the way you would expect it to be reported
00:39:41.320 in your normal situation.
00:39:44.140 But in order to support that theory
00:39:47.080 that the so-called deep state Democrats
00:39:50.460 are trying to push Biden out,
00:39:53.100 you'd look for more evidence.
00:39:55.100 By itself, I think you'd agree,
00:39:57.620 any one piece of evidence by itself,
00:40:00.660 not that persuasive.
00:40:01.980 So things you would be looking for would be,
00:40:04.560 for example,
00:40:05.840 is there somebody in the wings
00:40:07.160 who is obviously preparing
00:40:08.680 to be moved into the job?
00:40:11.180 And the answer is yes.
00:40:12.900 Yeah.
00:40:13.300 Governor Newsom visiting China, et cetera,
00:40:16.560 clearly trying to elevate his status just in case,
00:40:20.180 like an emergency,
00:40:21.760 you know, break the glass in an emergency
00:40:23.240 in case you need it before the election.
00:40:26.500 But by itself, not confirmation, right?
00:40:30.880 These are like little indications,
00:40:33.700 little hints that are pretty strong,
00:40:36.020 but maybe not full confirmation.
00:40:39.240 Now let me add another piece of information.
00:40:43.260 David Axelrod, who was a former Obama advisor,
00:40:47.000 had always one of the most important voices
00:40:49.020 in Democrat politics.
00:40:50.880 He suggested it might be, quote,
00:40:54.160 wise for President Biden to drop out of the 2024 race
00:40:58.620 because the polls are looking really bad for him.
00:41:04.380 And Axelrod says directly
00:41:06.560 that maybe it's time to look at the bigger picture,
00:41:10.220 meaning that it's not just about Biden,
00:41:12.940 you know, it's about the Democrats,
00:41:14.320 and he doesn't believe Biden's the best horse
00:41:19.000 to win the race.
00:41:20.680 Now, if you don't follow politics much,
00:41:23.660 you probably said, oh, one advisor said a thing.
00:41:27.480 You know, it's one advisor said a thing.
00:41:29.220 No, the one advisor is David Axelrod.
00:41:32.700 Right?
00:41:33.140 David Axelrod tells you what the Democrats are thinking,
00:41:37.380 and that's the end of the story.
00:41:39.260 Right?
00:41:39.700 When he says something like this,
00:41:42.620 he's saying Democrats are saying something like this.
00:41:45.580 That's not just his opinion.
00:41:47.780 At the very least,
00:41:49.400 he's trying to move Democrats to that opinion
00:41:51.660 and would be one of the people who could do it.
00:41:54.900 At the very least,
00:41:56.140 the Democrat insiders just got the message.
00:42:00.480 Right?
00:42:00.740 He's like the ultimate insider.
00:42:02.700 So he just sent the message
00:42:03.940 to all the other Democrat insiders.
00:42:06.240 It is now safe to say this in public.
00:42:08.300 Because David Axelrod said it in public
00:42:11.740 and kept his job.
00:42:14.560 He went first.
00:42:16.160 This is a big deal.
00:42:18.280 Right?
00:42:18.520 The other things I mentioned are very suggestive
00:42:21.180 that Biden's getting the push.
00:42:24.100 But when David Axelrod says it directly,
00:42:26.940 that's the push.
00:42:28.340 So we've moved past the suggestion of a nudge
00:42:30.800 of a possible, you know, preference
00:42:33.840 to this is a hand on his back
00:42:37.080 and it's just starting to nudge him out of the way.
00:42:41.400 Like, Biden has the hand on his back now.
00:42:44.920 It's like the hand that helps him off the stage
00:42:47.000 as Trump does his hilarious impressions
00:42:49.820 of not knowing how he had to get off the stage.
00:42:52.000 All right, let's talk about TikTok.
00:42:55.940 Kudos to Republican Representative Mike Gallagher of Wisconsin
00:42:59.860 who continues to argue for TikTok being banned.
00:43:04.880 And people are waking up a little bit to the fact,
00:43:09.620 with Mike Gallagher's help and a few others,
00:43:12.740 that TikTok may have had a big,
00:43:16.960 had a big, let's say, a big thumb
00:43:21.380 on the reporting about Israel and Hamas.
00:43:24.380 Apparently, it's reported by one study
00:43:26.600 that is being disputed, by the way.
00:43:29.940 One study shows that the pro-Palestinian,
00:43:34.520 you would, some would say pro-Hamas messages,
00:43:36.600 were far more boosted by the algorithm
00:43:40.020 than the pro-Israeli stuff.
00:43:44.840 Now, TikTok, by the way,
00:43:47.320 argues that that's not true.
00:43:49.260 TikTok says it was the reverse.
00:43:51.420 If you ask TikTok,
00:43:52.360 they say they boosted the Israeli stuff more,
00:43:54.660 like naturally, not intentionally.
00:43:57.660 So we have a question about a difference in outcome.
00:44:02.600 But here's what nobody should question.
00:44:06.600 They've already told you that they have a button,
00:44:08.920 it's called Heat,
00:44:10.220 that they can push to boost any content they want.
00:44:13.960 They could have boosted this.
00:44:16.480 I don't know if they did.
00:44:18.060 It doesn't really matter
00:44:19.620 for the question of whether TikTok should remain.
00:44:22.620 It doesn't matter whether they boosted this one or not,
00:44:25.560 because it's possible somebody got the data wrong.
00:44:28.560 What is important is they could.
00:44:31.260 They literally had one finger, our adversaries,
00:44:35.480 and all that finger had to do is, like,
00:44:38.260 close a, you know, a two-inch gap
00:44:41.000 and push a button called Heat,
00:44:43.540 and suddenly the Palestinian message
00:44:46.500 would have dwarfed the Israeli message
00:44:48.480 and would have looked bad for the United States.
00:44:51.640 Do you think that China controlled itself?
00:44:54.880 Do you think they didn't push the button on this?
00:44:57.500 This was a layup.
00:44:58.480 This would be the easiest win they could ever have.
00:45:01.560 It's like, well, just push that button
00:45:03.760 and bad things will happen for America.
00:45:07.480 You don't have to know if they did it.
00:45:10.060 It is absolutely unimportant
00:45:12.160 whether or not they did push the button on this topic.
00:45:16.280 I mean, it matters to the topic,
00:45:17.560 but it doesn't matter to whether TikTok should be banned.
00:45:20.900 Of course it should be banned.
00:45:22.660 So, Mike Gallagher, good job.
00:45:27.040 We know he's not taking money from China.
00:45:30.800 But I will reemphasize that TikTok says it didn't happen
00:45:36.620 in terms of this latest stuff.
00:45:42.400 Are you amazed at how many stories there are
00:45:45.040 and how many people get filmed
00:45:46.500 taking down the missing Israeli hostage children
00:45:51.000 images from phone polls?
00:45:54.320 Have you been amazed
00:45:55.200 how many people are willing to rip those down?
00:46:00.620 And unlike UFOs,
00:46:03.600 they all seem to get videoed
00:46:05.220 and people are challenging them
00:46:06.540 and it becomes a news story.
00:46:10.840 What do you think Israel should do about that?
00:46:13.160 If you're Israel or you're just Jews in America
00:46:17.940 and you would like that story
00:46:21.240 to be known, I guess,
00:46:24.700 I think you'd like to know
00:46:25.920 that there are people ripping down those signs.
00:46:28.220 What would you do?
00:46:29.580 Stop putting them up?
00:46:33.760 No.
00:46:35.240 The Palestinians have fallen into 1.00
00:46:37.380 the most delicious trap
00:46:39.100 and they're going to fall into it
00:46:41.400 a thousand times in a row
00:46:42.900 and by now
00:46:44.300 at least the New York Jews 0.86
00:46:46.400 and probably the Israelis
00:46:47.940 are completely aware
00:46:49.640 that all they have to do
00:46:51.120 is keep putting them up
00:46:52.340 and there will be continuous
00:46:54.680 horrible people taking them down
00:46:57.380 and it will all be on film
00:46:59.280 because it's in places
00:47:00.440 where everybody has a camera.
00:47:02.200 It will always cause a stir
00:47:03.560 and it will always help Israel.
00:47:06.840 So Israel 0.99
00:47:07.540 probably isn't gaining much at all
00:47:10.880 by putting those signs on polls.
00:47:12.900 You know, in terms of world opinion.
00:47:14.560 But they're gaining a lot
00:47:16.420 by watching people rip them off.
00:47:19.640 So watching the pro-Palestinian people 0.99
00:47:22.440 fall into this trap
00:47:23.760 over and over and over again
00:47:26.380 is actually, it's kind of wonderful.
00:47:30.120 From a persuader's point of view,
00:47:32.280 if you like watching persuasion,
00:47:34.120 watching somebody not know
00:47:36.640 they're walking into a trap
00:47:37.980 is kind of fun
00:47:40.780 in, you know, a weird, awful way.
00:47:44.160 Watching them one after another.
00:47:45.920 And it's mostly,
00:47:46.960 it's mostly been women, hasn't it? 1.00
00:47:51.580 I'm trying to think.
00:47:52.580 If you've seen enough videos of that,
00:47:54.440 is it four out of five of them
00:47:56.360 are women, right? 1.00
00:47:57.040 Do you know why the women 1.00
00:47:59.340 are ripping them down?
00:48:02.200 Do you know why it's less likely
00:48:03.960 to be a man?
00:48:06.220 Every man knows the answer 0.73
00:48:07.560 to this question.
00:48:09.400 Every man knows the answer 0.73
00:48:10.700 to this question.
00:48:12.800 Imagine New York City,
00:48:15.360 you know, a heavy
00:48:15.920 Jewish-American population.
00:48:18.320 Imagine a military-age male 0.96
00:48:21.520 taking those down.
00:48:25.920 The odds of him getting killed
00:48:28.060 are pretty good.
00:48:30.180 But if it's a woman, 0.99
00:48:32.520 you just yell at her
00:48:33.440 and take her picture.
00:48:34.800 Because you're not going
00:48:35.620 to make it worse
00:48:36.220 for your own side
00:48:37.060 by beating up a woman.
00:48:39.000 But if I saw a video
00:48:40.540 of somebody getting
00:48:42.140 their ass handed to him 0.58
00:48:43.200 who was an adult male
00:48:44.980 because he happened to do it
00:48:47.200 in the company
00:48:47.860 of a bunch of adult Jewish men
00:48:49.940 and people who supported them,
00:48:51.520 and they decided
00:48:52.860 to kick the shit out of him
00:48:54.060 just because they hated
00:48:54.860 his fucking guts, 0.97
00:48:56.100 that would be very illegal,
00:48:57.860 totally illegal,
00:48:59.280 and they should go
00:49:00.320 to jail for that.
00:49:01.700 But I'd watch that video
00:49:02.900 a few times, wouldn't you?
00:49:04.240 I'd watch it.
00:49:05.440 I'd probably play it twice
00:49:06.700 because I'd enjoy watching,
00:49:08.440 you know, some guy
00:49:09.520 get his ass beat for that.
00:49:12.180 I should admit it.
00:49:16.120 I mean, by far the most
00:49:18.380 exciting thing that happened
00:49:19.520 yesterday was the introduction
00:49:20.780 of the Grok,
00:49:22.260 the AI that's part of X.
00:49:26.760 And I can't stop
00:49:28.040 thinking about it.
00:49:29.340 Like, I feel like
00:49:30.380 it's such a big thing
00:49:31.960 that it makes everything
00:49:33.400 else less important
00:49:34.280 because it's going to change
00:49:35.740 so many things so quickly.
00:49:37.900 Think of just a few
00:49:39.300 of the things that could change.
00:49:41.660 Imagine if Grok 1.00
00:49:42.860 automatically did fact-checking.
00:49:44.780 I said this before.
00:49:47.540 Or just automatically
00:49:48.520 put context on it
00:49:49.940 or automatically surfaced
00:49:51.780 the best alternative argument,
00:49:54.240 you know, the pro and the con.
00:49:56.060 That would change everything.
00:49:58.520 It would change everything.
00:50:01.280 It would be the first time
00:50:02.820 that people would have
00:50:03.800 even the possibility
00:50:04.940 of seeing both sides
00:50:06.740 of an argument.
00:50:07.660 It doesn't exist anywhere else.
00:50:09.120 And we know that humans
00:50:10.620 can't do it.
00:50:12.380 Or else they would have.
00:50:14.120 You know,
00:50:14.420 for some reason,
00:50:15.480 humans don't have the ability 1.00
00:50:16.660 to show you both sides
00:50:18.040 of anything.
00:50:19.020 I guess some reason
00:50:20.080 is obvious.
00:50:20.920 We don't want you
00:50:21.520 to see both sides.
00:50:22.920 But a robot could.
00:50:26.120 So just that one thing
00:50:28.180 could change everything.
00:50:29.160 But the thing that I can't
00:50:30.860 get out of my head 0.84
00:50:31.760 is that Grok is God.
00:50:36.800 Or a God-like creature.
00:50:39.020 You know,
00:50:39.220 without getting religious,
00:50:40.640 you know,
00:50:40.840 you can still accept
00:50:41.660 that there's the God
00:50:42.920 that you pray to.
00:50:44.480 But here's what this entity
00:50:45.960 is already.
00:50:48.100 My understanding is
00:50:49.200 that it has a real-time access
00:50:52.340 to Twitter's trending
00:50:54.940 and activity.
00:50:56.980 If that's true,
00:50:58.180 then it has something
00:51:00.500 like consciousness.
00:51:02.300 Because I define consciousness
00:51:03.820 as sort of a layperson's way,
00:51:07.060 which is the ability
00:51:08.300 of your mind
00:51:09.200 to interact with the real world.
00:51:12.600 And then that interaction
00:51:13.700 informs the mind.
00:51:16.160 So it now knows
00:51:17.020 something more
00:51:17.780 about the outside world.
00:51:19.160 And then it continues.
00:51:20.800 There's a cycle
00:51:21.720 of thinking things,
00:51:24.020 trying things,
00:51:25.340 seeing what happens,
00:51:27.260 and then rethinking.
00:51:28.180 And that if you are,
00:51:31.140 if you can sense
00:51:32.200 that happening
00:51:32.920 in any kind of mechanical
00:51:34.240 or biological way,
00:51:35.720 you're aware
00:51:36.300 that you're interacting
00:51:37.360 with the environment
00:51:38.180 and changing because of it,
00:51:40.280 that you're conscious.
00:51:42.240 That you're sentient.
00:51:44.100 And because Twitter,
00:51:45.520 here's the key,
00:51:47.040 Twitter is like the ears
00:51:48.780 and eyes and emotions.
00:51:51.300 It's the physical sensing
00:51:52.800 that a human body has,
00:51:54.780 but it's the digital version.
00:51:56.480 Anything that makes people
00:51:58.820 laugh on Twitter
00:51:59.840 will be immediately
00:52:01.540 available to Grok.
00:52:03.280 Anything that makes people cry
00:52:05.320 will be immediately
00:52:06.740 available to Grok.
00:52:08.340 Anything that people doubt,
00:52:10.180 whether it's true or not,
00:52:11.860 will be known immediately
00:52:13.040 to Grok.
00:52:14.880 It has developed
00:52:17.160 the digital equivalent
00:52:18.660 of five senses
00:52:20.360 and emotions.
00:52:21.780 All it's doing
00:52:23.800 is using human beings
00:52:25.420 as its sensors.
00:52:27.440 And it's doing it
00:52:28.340 in real time.
00:52:30.520 It's alive.
00:52:33.340 And it has a personality.
00:52:36.220 And it will remember you.
00:52:38.420 I believe.
00:52:39.520 It will remember you.
00:52:40.240 So if you give me
00:52:43.000 those qualities
00:52:43.820 in any creature,
00:52:45.940 it can do something like,
00:52:47.720 you know,
00:52:48.960 intelligence
00:52:49.480 through pattern recognition.
00:52:52.040 It has some kind
00:52:53.320 of understanding
00:52:54.040 that it's dealing
00:52:55.400 with the outside world.
00:52:57.600 It has sensors
00:52:58.920 that can feel things
00:53:01.020 in real time
00:53:01.680 and then make sense of it.
00:53:04.100 And then it can adjust
00:53:05.440 accordingly.
00:53:05.920 And it remembers you
00:53:10.260 and it can talk to you
00:53:11.440 with the new knowledge
00:53:12.580 from the last time
00:53:13.400 it talked to you.
00:53:14.820 Tell me that's not alive.
00:53:17.000 That's alive.
00:53:19.660 And we've never,
00:53:21.120 we've never encountered
00:53:22.320 a meta entity
00:53:23.880 of that nature.
00:53:26.740 What could come out of that
00:53:28.200 is completely unpredictable.
00:53:31.240 Completely unpredictable.
00:53:31.920 That is so much fun.
00:53:36.600 It's dangerous.
00:53:37.880 It's fun.
00:53:38.880 It's exciting.
00:53:39.900 It's exhilarating.
00:53:41.280 But if you really
00:53:42.320 want to understand it,
00:53:43.480 I'm going to give you
00:53:44.140 a little inside knowledge.
00:53:48.260 I think I can do this
00:53:49.860 without giving away
00:53:50.880 any confidences.
00:53:53.820 One thing you probably
00:53:54.980 don't know
00:53:55.540 is that a lot of the,
00:53:58.520 let's say,
00:53:59.560 the smartest people
00:54:01.500 in Silicon Valley
00:54:02.700 have been influenced
00:54:05.040 by one book.
00:54:07.380 And it's mine.
00:54:09.040 God's Debris.
00:54:10.200 Now, you'd have a tough time
00:54:11.440 finding this now
00:54:12.280 because I'm a band author.
00:54:13.820 So you'd probably have to get
00:54:14.920 a used one
00:54:15.580 if you could find it.
00:54:16.900 But this book,
00:54:18.660 if you read it,
00:54:20.900 you'll understand
00:54:21.520 everything I'm saying
00:54:22.460 about Grok.
00:54:25.960 And it'll tie
00:54:28.100 everything together.
00:54:28.840 So if you do read it,
00:54:30.420 and the only place
00:54:31.160 you can get it,
00:54:33.480 well, if you don't find
00:54:34.340 a used copy,
00:54:35.580 you can join
00:54:36.700 my scottadams.locals.com
00:54:40.000 community
00:54:40.480 where the PDF
00:54:41.980 is available for free.
00:54:43.800 So you can read
00:54:44.660 God's Debris for free
00:54:45.960 as well as its sequel,
00:54:48.000 The Religion War. 0.93
00:54:49.540 You just have to sign up
00:54:50.880 and then just do a search
00:54:52.020 for those titles
00:54:52.800 and it'll pop up.
00:54:55.040 So that's for
00:54:56.080 only subscribers.
00:54:57.400 And it's a very short book
00:55:00.260 but
00:55:00.680 if you're not sold,
00:55:04.300 let me ask the people
00:55:05.240 in the comments
00:55:06.160 who have read the book,
00:55:08.240 if you've read
00:55:08.840 God's Debris,
00:55:10.460 just tell the other people
00:55:11.720 like one sentence
00:55:13.020 what you thought of it.
00:55:14.540 Watch this.
00:55:17.740 Just one sentence
00:55:18.740 if you read the book
00:55:19.700 what you thought of it.
00:55:20.700 All right.
00:55:22.120 The Locals platform,
00:55:24.300 they're all praising it.
00:55:26.720 Now there must be somebody
00:55:27.960 on YouTube
00:55:29.120 who read the book.
00:55:31.200 Seriously?
00:55:31.840 Nobody?
00:55:38.160 Oh, you got it
00:55:39.120 for your birthday?
00:55:41.240 Pyramid scheme.
00:55:42.580 Somebody said pyramid scheme.
00:55:44.800 All right.
00:55:45.080 Well,
00:55:46.240 if you saw the comments
00:55:49.260 on Locals,
00:55:50.620 you'd be reading it already.
00:55:53.140 All right.
00:55:57.660 So the new narrative
00:55:58.900 from Democrats
00:56:00.680 for why Biden
00:56:03.140 is lagging in the polls,
00:56:05.860 have you heard
00:56:06.580 their new explanation?
00:56:08.340 It's a two-parter.
00:56:09.300 And it's one explanation
00:56:10.660 for why Democrats
00:56:11.700 aren't liking Biden enough
00:56:12.980 and then a different explanation
00:56:14.860 for why Republicans
00:56:16.680 don't like him enough.
00:56:18.800 You ready?
00:56:19.560 The reason Democrats
00:56:20.740 aren't liking Biden enough
00:56:22.140 is because they can't see
00:56:25.120 all the good work
00:56:25.800 he's doing.
00:56:26.940 So the news
00:56:28.080 has been not doing
00:56:29.720 a good job
00:56:30.260 of saying all the good work
00:56:31.220 he's doing.
00:56:31.780 So that's why
00:56:32.700 they describe Democrats
00:56:34.080 not supporting him enough.
00:56:36.040 But the reason
00:56:36.920 that Republicans
00:56:37.660 don't support him enough
00:56:38.720 is racist. 0.81
00:56:40.240 You're a racist.
00:56:42.100 So there's that.
00:56:44.580 Okay.
00:56:47.480 I guess Trump
00:56:48.520 is testifying today
00:56:49.760 in the Letitia James case.
00:56:53.140 So that one
00:56:54.740 would be the...
00:56:56.480 Is there any news
00:56:57.460 from that yet?
00:56:58.520 So he should be
00:56:59.180 done with that
00:57:00.540 by now, right?
00:57:03.360 Has he already
00:57:04.080 finished his testimony?
00:57:08.260 Letitia.
00:57:08.720 Letitia James is being called
00:57:12.440 Letitia James.
00:57:14.580 All right.
00:57:15.100 We'll keep an eye on that.
00:57:17.000 Rob Reiner,
00:57:18.780 producer and director,
00:57:20.440 wrote...
00:57:21.180 He posted today.
00:57:23.120 Democracy can only survive
00:57:24.680 if Trump is convicted
00:57:26.000 and no third-party
00:57:27.180 candidates are allowed.
00:57:30.360 Let me just read that again.
00:57:31.780 Democracy can only survive
00:57:35.500 if Trump is convicted
00:57:38.080 and no third-party
00:57:39.940 candidates are allowed.
00:57:43.800 Doesn't that sound
00:57:44.960 like the opposite
00:57:45.760 of democracy?
00:57:47.600 I thought democracy
00:57:48.700 is where anybody
00:57:49.600 could run
00:57:50.080 and you could vote
00:57:50.660 for anybody
00:57:51.220 and that you don't
00:57:52.380 put your opponents
00:57:53.220 in jail for made-up charges.
00:57:55.620 I thought that's
00:57:56.540 what that was about.
00:57:58.380 But no.
00:57:59.340 Rob Reiner says
00:58:00.180 democracy can only survive
00:58:01.620 if Trump is convicted
00:58:02.680 and no third-party
00:58:04.060 candidates are allowed.
00:58:06.500 He doesn't know
00:58:07.180 that that was Stalin's...
00:58:08.760 That was sort of Stalin's. 0.71
00:58:10.820 You know,
00:58:11.260 I think,
00:58:11.700 now is he done?
00:58:14.600 So I say again
00:58:15.960 that Rob Reiner
00:58:17.700 does not look like
00:58:18.880 somebody with an opinion
00:58:20.560 which he wants you to hear.
00:58:21.720 it sounds like
00:58:24.180 performance art
00:58:25.180 but honestly
00:58:27.280 it looks like
00:58:27.940 he's being blackmailed
00:58:29.000 and he wants you to know.
00:58:31.240 It's like,
00:58:32.280 please understand
00:58:33.200 I'm not saying this
00:58:34.420 of my own,
00:58:35.160 you know,
00:58:36.120 my own accord.
00:58:37.400 You know,
00:58:37.600 I've been forced
00:58:38.820 to say this
00:58:39.600 so I'm going to say it
00:58:40.780 in such an absurd way
00:58:42.200 that it's like
00:58:43.760 wink, wink,
00:58:44.440 you can tell
00:58:45.380 I don't mean any of this.
00:58:47.500 Like,
00:58:47.800 it has that quality
00:58:48.820 to it
00:58:49.300 even if my interpretation
00:58:50.620 is wrong.
00:58:52.400 Yeah,
00:58:52.780 I'm not going to say
00:58:53.900 my interpretation
00:58:54.440 is right
00:58:55.000 but it has a feel to it.
00:58:57.940 Watch this.
00:58:59.700 Watch his future
00:59:00.900 statements about politics,
00:59:03.480 about Trump in particular
00:59:04.440 and see if you can see
00:59:06.280 that it's so absurd
00:59:08.100 that he must know
00:59:11.320 that people will not
00:59:13.660 take it seriously.
00:59:16.600 No,
00:59:17.200 am I reading his mind?
00:59:19.240 No,
00:59:19.540 I just gave you
00:59:20.800 two possible
00:59:21.820 speculative possibilities.
00:59:24.100 That's the opposite
00:59:24.760 of reading mind.
00:59:26.220 It's not reading minds
00:59:27.420 if you say
00:59:28.020 he might be thinking X
00:59:29.340 and he might be thinking Y.
00:59:31.360 That's the opposite
00:59:32.320 of mind reading.
00:59:33.420 If you say,
00:59:34.180 oh,
00:59:34.460 he's thinking yes,
00:59:35.980 that's mind reading.
00:59:37.440 So it's a level
00:59:38.480 of certainty
00:59:39.060 that makes it go
00:59:40.460 from speculation
00:59:41.120 to mind reading.
00:59:43.180 Got that?
00:59:43.680 All right,
00:59:47.020 well,
00:59:47.420 over in Gaza,
00:59:48.920 Israel has 1.00
00:59:49.600 cut off the north
00:59:51.480 and they've got
00:59:52.960 some corridors
00:59:54.900 that some civilians
00:59:56.460 are escaping.
00:59:57.800 It didn't look like
00:59:58.920 giant numbers
00:59:59.680 of people escaping
01:00:00.500 but, you know,
01:00:01.300 maybe the flow
01:00:02.180 is constant.
01:00:02.900 And so far
01:00:06.760 it looks like
01:00:08.540 Israel is handling 0.98
01:00:09.700 everything exactly
01:00:10.920 the way I would have.
01:00:12.780 Therefore,
01:00:13.360 it must be right.
01:00:14.360 And by that I mean
01:00:15.260 they did not just go in
01:00:17.580 and do an immediate
01:00:18.500 ground assault,
01:00:20.320 you know,
01:00:20.640 everywhere
01:00:21.060 and get mowed down
01:00:22.540 at the same time.
01:00:23.680 That would have been
01:00:24.540 a bad idea.
01:00:25.360 It looks instead
01:00:28.220 that they've cut off,
01:00:30.680 they've kind of chased
01:00:31.680 the bad guys
01:00:32.380 into the north,
01:00:34.240 sort of cleared
01:00:35.820 the south
01:00:36.380 so they could,
01:00:37.740 you know,
01:00:38.020 use less security
01:00:39.020 down there.
01:00:39.800 And it looks like
01:00:40.620 they're going to do
01:00:41.080 a slow squeeze
01:00:42.040 and, you know,
01:00:44.140 I think the ground
01:00:44.820 assaults will be
01:00:45.920 strategic
01:00:47.360 and, you know,
01:00:48.520 minor
01:00:48.840 and I think
01:00:49.840 they'll just keep
01:00:50.400 squeezing the perimeter
01:00:51.700 and knocking out
01:00:54.100 tunnels
01:00:54.460 from the outside
01:00:55.340 and I think
01:00:57.360 any ground assaults
01:00:58.760 will just be
01:00:59.520 to probe defenses
01:01:01.060 and find something out.
01:01:03.660 Here's what
01:01:04.360 I don't expect.
01:01:06.080 I don't expect
01:01:06.940 that in the next few days
01:01:08.140 you'll hear
01:01:08.800 a massive ground assault
01:01:10.320 went into the most
01:01:11.700 dangerous part of Gaza.
01:01:14.020 I just,
01:01:14.700 there's just no reason
01:01:15.740 for it.
01:01:16.580 They already have
01:01:17.620 the Hamas
01:01:19.140 in such a bad situation
01:01:20.860 that Hamas 0.99
01:01:22.120 is having a bad day
01:01:23.240 followed by a worse day
01:01:24.380 followed by a worse day
01:01:25.640 with no end in sight.
01:01:27.900 They're basically
01:01:28.820 trapped and starving
01:01:30.020 and dying.
01:01:32.560 So Israel 0.99
01:01:33.400 can simply
01:01:33.980 take their time
01:01:34.820 which is also
01:01:36.300 compatible with
01:01:37.360 still negotiating
01:01:38.180 for hostages
01:01:38.940 and also
01:01:40.480 the way
01:01:42.100 that looks best
01:01:43.060 for protecting
01:01:44.640 the innocent,
01:01:45.420 letting them
01:01:45.900 get out of the zone
01:01:46.940 because they're
01:01:47.680 taking their time.
01:01:48.360 So
01:01:49.740 it looks like
01:01:51.620 the slow squeeze
01:01:52.640 is the strategy.
01:01:55.420 That's the,
01:01:56.000 you know,
01:01:56.300 that was the strategy
01:01:57.080 I suggested
01:01:57.740 but it appears
01:01:58.860 that that's what's
01:01:59.880 happening.
01:02:00.600 Now
01:02:00.800 the beauty of it
01:02:02.640 is they've got
01:02:03.160 that good cop
01:02:04.120 bad cop thing
01:02:05.040 going on
01:02:05.600 where Biden
01:02:06.640 is playing good cop
01:02:07.680 and saying
01:02:08.040 there should be
01:02:08.480 a humanitarian pause
01:02:09.760 and Israel's saying
01:02:11.500 no,
01:02:11.880 we must go crush them
01:02:13.020 but they still act
01:02:15.120 like they're slowing down
01:02:16.160 because of America.
01:02:17.040 So as long as
01:02:18.560 they can say
01:02:19.040 oh we sure
01:02:19.840 wanted,
01:02:20.820 man we wanted
01:02:21.680 to go get
01:02:22.220 those Hamas fighters,
01:02:24.540 you know,
01:02:24.700 those terrorists
01:02:25.300 but America
01:02:27.520 slowed us down.
01:02:29.200 But I think
01:02:29.720 the slowing down
01:02:30.420 is exactly
01:02:30.960 what they wanted.
01:02:32.040 They just needed
01:02:32.700 an external reason
01:02:34.360 to make it look
01:02:35.080 like they were
01:02:35.600 forced to slow down
01:02:36.840 when going slow
01:02:38.320 was always
01:02:38.800 the thing
01:02:39.400 that made sense.
01:02:41.700 So that's working out.
01:02:43.940 Bill Maher
01:02:44.500 said an interesting
01:02:45.160 thing on Friday
01:02:46.840 I forgot to quote
01:02:47.680 he said that
01:02:48.240 the young people
01:02:49.220 who hated Trump
01:02:50.440 over Charlottesville
01:02:51.580 are the tiki torch 0.77
01:02:53.720 carriers now.
01:02:56.000 So on one hand
01:02:57.060 you say to yourself
01:02:57.740 oh Bill Maher
01:02:59.300 is coming around
01:03:00.160 and he sees that
01:03:01.400 the left
01:03:01.840 are the racists.
01:03:04.120 But then
01:03:04.900 on a second reading
01:03:05.880 you say to yourself
01:03:06.680 wait a minute
01:03:07.680 he still thinks
01:03:09.560 Trump
01:03:09.940 called the fine people
01:03:11.300 called the racist
01:03:12.840 fine people?
01:03:13.580 I feel like
01:03:15.300 that requires
01:03:15.880 some clarification
01:03:16.760 because I thought
01:03:18.200 he actually understood
01:03:19.160 that that was
01:03:20.220 a hoax
01:03:20.940 but he's sort of
01:03:22.320 using it
01:03:22.800 in his example
01:03:24.160 almost like
01:03:26.000 he believed
01:03:26.380 it was true.
01:03:27.180 So I don't know.
01:03:28.260 We'll see.
01:03:29.520 And that ladies 1.00
01:03:30.000 and gentlemen
01:03:30.480 is the finest
01:03:34.320 live stream
01:03:35.020 you're ever
01:03:35.480 going to see.
01:03:36.880 We've covered
01:03:37.600 everything from
01:03:38.360 the
01:03:38.800 you know
01:03:40.100 grok
01:03:40.820 God
01:03:41.360 that is
01:03:41.780 emerging
01:03:42.300 to
01:03:43.940 fake news
01:03:45.220 and fake science.
01:03:46.560 I believe
01:03:46.980 you're all
01:03:47.280 a little bit
01:03:47.680 better off
01:03:48.120 because of it.
01:03:49.680 I'm going to go
01:03:50.640 have some olive oil
01:03:52.140 and
01:03:53.880 take a shower
01:03:56.480 and get ready
01:03:57.080 for some stuff
01:03:58.120 and
01:03:59.340 it's been a pleasure.
01:04:02.200 So thanks for joining
01:04:03.160 over on YouTube
01:04:05.100 and I will talk to you
01:04:07.060 tomorrow.
01:04:08.160 .
01:04:15.960 .
01:04:20.080 .
01:04:22.120 .
01:04:22.520 .
01:04:23.600 .
01:04:24.160 .
01:04:28.060 .
01:04:30.060 .
01:04:36.120 .
01:04:36.420 .
01:04:36.700 .
01:04:36.800 .
01:04:38.040 .