Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2293 Scott Adams： CWSA 11⧸15⧸23

00:00:00.000 Do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do good morning everybody and welcome

00:00:10.920 to the highlight of human civilization and if you'd like to take your experience up to levels

00:00:17.740 you know where I'm going with this don't you levels that no one's ever seen before can't

00:00:22.460 even be expressed in human words well all you need for that is a cup or a mug or a glass

00:00:27.080 a tankard cell, a chalice of stein, a canteen jugger, a flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:32.800 Fill it with your favorite liquid.

00:00:34.140 I like coffee.

00:00:35.560 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine at the end of the day.

00:00:39.740 The thing that makes everything better.

00:00:41.020 It's called the Simultaneous Sip.

00:00:43.560 It happens now.

00:00:44.380 Go.

00:00:48.800 Oh, that's so good.

00:00:51.260 That's some good sipping right there.

00:00:52.980 By the way, a lot of people ask me for my pronouns.

00:00:58.700 I prefer disgraced.

00:01:02.060 So if you're thinking about that, disgraced.

00:01:05.040 So a video of something shooting sideways across the sky that could only be a UFO, probably

00:01:11.720 aliens from another dimension.

00:01:14.340 Or it could be number 6,523 fake videos of UFOs.

00:01:21.480 It's one of those two things.

00:01:23.900 It's either 6,423 fake videos in a row, and it's another one, or possibly beings from

00:01:31.600 another dimension.

00:01:33.460 So put your money down.

00:01:37.920 This is the funnest day of news.

00:01:40.840 It's going to sound like I'm making this up.

00:01:42.680 That Representative Tim Burchett accused Kevin McCarthy of giving him a sucker punch in the kidneys, as

00:01:54.700 Burchett was doing a live interview to the news, and apparently, I think Burchett had voted to vote out Kevin

00:02:03.320 McCarthy, and allegedly, and allegedly, I mean, I wasn't there, but allegedly McCarthy elbowed him in the kidneys so hard while he was on live TV that it caused Burchett to actually, you know, try to chase him down the hallway to fight, and then McCarthy acted like nothing happened, or it was no big deal, or he's blowing it out of proportion or something.

00:02:26.940 And I'm thinking to myself, and I'm thinking to myself, that happened?

00:02:30.180 Did that happen? That's a real thing that happened?

00:02:33.440 That a member of Congress was assaulted while giving an interview by the ex-Speaker of the House?

00:02:40.880 Did that actually happen in the real world?

00:02:43.780 Well, that's the most outrageous and crazy thing I've ever heard of, and there's no way that two things like that could have happened yesterday.

00:02:52.380 I'll tell you, that's one of those things that happens once in a million years.

00:02:58.680 Well, did you see the congressional hearing in which Senator Mullen challenged the Teamster president to a physical fight?

00:03:08.860 Because of something the Teamster representative had said previously.

00:03:15.460 So they decided they were going to stand up and go fight, but it was stopped by Bernie.

00:03:22.220 So Bernie Sanders, I guess, was in charge, and he banged his little gavel, and he stopped it.

00:03:29.360 Now, have you ever seen men pretend they want to fight, but really, really, they want you to break it up?

00:03:37.020 You've seen that, right?

00:03:38.040 Oh, I'm so going to fight.

00:03:39.720 I'm so going to fight, unless, you know, unless somebody holds me back.

00:03:44.040 Anybody? Anybody?

00:03:45.140 Oh, oh, I want to heal.

00:03:46.940 Oh, I'm going to, let's go outside.

00:03:48.980 Let's go outside right now.

00:03:50.440 Don't hold me back.

00:03:51.640 Oh, oh, oh, I'm being held back.

00:03:54.680 Oh, great, great.

00:03:56.100 I so want to go outside, but now I'm being held back.

00:04:00.120 I can't tell you how much I want to be in a physical fight right now.

00:04:03.560 If only I could, I'm not being held back.

00:04:06.280 So here's what actually happened, and I'm going to tell this literally, but I'll use funny words to describe it, but it's accurate.

00:04:17.180 Senator Mullen really wanted to fight, but he was prevented by an octogenarian with a tiny hammer.

00:04:28.640 Oh, oh, I wanted to fight so badly, but I had this octogenarian with a tiny hammer, and he hit that, the gavel down, and I'm like, oh, no, tiny hammer.

00:04:41.540 That's going to stop me.

00:04:42.580 So I really wanted to fight until the octogenarian with a tiny hammer weighed in, and then what could I do?

00:04:50.000 What could I do?

00:04:50.600 I had to back down.

00:04:53.420 Yeah.

00:04:54.040 Those are two stories that happened in the real world that you live in.

00:05:01.300 Now, you might say to yourself, is this a sign that everything is falling apart and society is crumbling?

00:05:06.480 No, no, it's a sign that the news has finally turned funny, like it always meant to be.

00:05:15.060 We don't need all this war and killing, and we need more like this.

00:05:20.180 I would like to see our representatives duke it out, or at least pretend they're going to duke it out and be held back by 80-year-old guys with tiny hammers.

00:05:31.000 That'll work, too.

00:05:31.900 It's just as funny, either way.

00:05:33.940 But I, for one, welcome this new competitive approach.

00:05:39.160 So, what else is happening?

00:05:41.000 I guess TMZ had a big scoop where it showed RFK Jr. walking barefoot on a plane going to the bathroom and back.

00:05:49.660 And people said, my God, a future president walking barefoot on a plane?

00:05:54.880 We cannot have this.

00:05:56.680 This is so bad.

00:05:57.760 Who would do this?

00:05:58.540 Whoever walks barefoot in a plane.

00:06:01.360 And RFK Jr. cleverly used it to get attention.

00:06:05.720 So he did a funny video where he's sitting in the airport with a full suit on.

00:06:12.040 And he says he'd never do that again.

00:06:14.080 And then they pan back, and he's barefoot in his suit.

00:06:18.000 Very good.

00:06:19.500 Very nicely done.

00:06:20.740 It's very hard.

00:06:22.200 It's really tough for a politician to do an intentional humor skit and have it work.

00:06:29.140 Now, what he did was he kept it simple, right?

00:06:32.720 Keeping it simple was what made this work.

00:06:35.080 So the joke was just they panned out and he was barefoot.

00:06:38.400 So all he had to do was deliver like a straight line.

00:06:41.280 Oh, I'd never do that again.

00:06:42.460 And then it worked.

00:06:44.240 Totally good execution.

00:06:46.780 And then he put out a little meme that said, no shirt, no shoes, no secret service protection.

00:06:53.760 No shirt, no shoes, no secret service protection.

00:07:01.260 Well, I mean, it's funny unless somebody attacks him.

00:07:03.520 So, RFK Jr. for the win.

00:07:10.740 There's a little drama over at the Daily Wire.

00:07:14.560 Candace Owens has her views on the Hamas-Israel situation, which are a little bit at odds with Ben Shapiro.

00:07:22.180 And I guess Ben Shapiro didn't mind saying that in a public gathering of Daily Wire people and somebody caught it on camera.

00:07:29.700 So it makes me wonder, how long does Candace Owens last at the Daily Wire under this specific situation that Ben Shapiro thinks she's spreading bad information about Israel?

00:07:45.040 Can you survive that?

00:07:46.480 I would love it if she did, right?

00:07:52.540 Because I would rather see the conversation be brought up to another level.

00:07:59.040 I mean, wouldn't you love to see Ben Shapiro and Candace Owens have a little podcast together now?

00:08:05.920 I would.

00:08:07.600 And I'll tell you what would be the outcome of that.

00:08:11.240 Ben Shapiro would probably provide some historical context that Candace needed.

00:08:17.360 Candace would probably say, thank you for filling in those gaps. 0.80

00:08:23.100 And then they would be two smart, capable people who went on with their lives.

00:08:27.980 It could turn out really well.

00:08:30.000 So I think there's a play here where Ben Shapiro and Candace Owens make us all smarter.

00:08:38.460 Right?

00:08:38.880 I mean, nobody gets all the facts right.

00:08:42.120 You know, maybe Ben Shapiro does.

00:08:43.680 He is kind of an outlier.

00:08:46.900 So maybe he does.

00:08:47.760 Maybe he gets all the facts right.

00:08:49.200 But the rest of us don't.

00:08:51.080 So there's nothing wrong with a Ben Shapiro straightening you out once in a while, whoever you are.

00:08:56.900 You know, we all need a Ben Shapiro sometimes just to tell us what we missed.

00:09:02.140 Make it positive.

00:09:02.900 I like the drama.

00:09:05.620 I like the fact that Ben Shapiro said, was willing to say directly to the staff what he thought.

00:09:11.200 I like that Candace Owens is Candace Owens.

00:09:14.840 Talk it out.

00:09:16.180 Could be good.

00:09:16.700 In the what could be more ridiculous category, you know the tragic story of a hockey player, Adam Johnson, who was, how should I say it?

00:09:31.160 Another player lifted his skate and seemed to thrust it into Adam Johnson's neck, which killed him.

00:09:39.900 He actually died on the ice, tragically.

00:09:42.740 And today the story is that the player who did that is going to be arrested and charged with murder.

00:09:54.720 So now a part of the story that's important, just because it's 2023 and this is the way we talk about everything,

00:10:01.700 is that the person who died was white and the person who is arrested for murder is black.

00:10:08.720 Now, as you know, that would be sort of not playing into the most popular narrative of all news organizations,

00:10:18.060 that they like the George Floyd situation where you take a thing that happened one time to one person in the most totally unique situation

00:10:29.200 and you try to make that seem like it's, you know, a representative of the whole.

00:10:35.160 Oh, George Floyd represents all violence against black people, which of course it did not.

00:10:41.620 It was exactly one situation of which I've never heard of one like it.

00:10:46.460 It's not exactly like anything I've ever heard of.

00:10:48.480 But we like to generalize it if somebody's got a narrative that says,

00:10:53.600 oh, let's generalize this, you know, once in a million anecdote and try to make something out of it. 0.89

00:10:59.860 But when the reverse is true and it would look like a black man killing a white man,

00:11:06.600 again, let me stress, it's as anecdotal as the George Floyd thing is.

00:11:12.940 There has never been another situation of a black hockey player killing a white hockey player.

00:11:20.080 There probably will never be another one.

00:11:22.920 So to imagine that it represents anything, it doesn't.

00:11:27.600 It literally represents two people in a tragic situation.

00:11:32.020 But how differently they are treated.

00:11:34.700 One gets a statue and it becomes the biggest story for years.

00:11:38.600 And the other one, you won't even believe this.

00:11:41.380 One news entity, instead of showing the perpetrator's face or even mentioning the name,

00:11:48.880 they're actually not mentioning the name of the famous hockey player who was arrested.

00:11:55.880 Not even saying his name.

00:11:58.100 They're not showing his picture because that would be a bad narrative.

00:12:02.520 But worse, one entity, one of the news entities,

00:12:06.640 showed a stock photo of a white person being arrested and handcuffed.

00:12:11.380 I mean, just hold that in your mind for a moment.

00:12:16.880 They tried so hard to avoid anything that could be turned into a negative narrative,

00:12:22.420 which, by the way, I agree with.

00:12:24.200 I do not think they should allow that to be turned into some statement about black and white people,

00:12:29.240 because it's not.

00:12:30.640 No more than the George Floyd was.

00:12:32.600 It's about one person.

00:12:35.180 You know, we are infinitely unique.

00:12:37.000 It doesn't mean anything if one of us does something.

00:12:40.760 So, but the wild level that they would go to,

00:12:46.220 to not show a picture of the perpetrator who is a professional hockey player.

00:12:51.620 It's not like some private citizen and nobody heard about this thing.

00:12:54.920 So, you know, you want to give him some privacy?

00:12:56.940 It was in all the news until he got arrested and then they scrub it out. 0.53

00:13:01.620 So, the ridiculousness level is off the chart there.

00:13:08.000 Well, singer Billie Eilish, she was in the news because she was bemoaning.

00:13:15.920 That's what you say when you don't like what somebody said.

00:13:19.200 They're bemoaning.

00:13:20.680 Isn't that kind of insulting to say somebody's bemoaning something?

00:13:24.400 It's like, oh, I'm moaning.

00:13:26.100 Why can't they just have an opinion and they're saying it?

00:13:30.660 Are you really bemoaning?

00:13:32.880 Are you really complaining?

00:13:34.880 Or are you just describing a situation?

00:13:36.720 So, I'm going to defend Billie Eilish

00:13:38.980 because I don't think that's the right way to characterize it.

00:13:42.720 It was just an opinion.

00:13:44.340 But what she says is that being a woman in the public light is a perpetual war.

00:13:50.220 And she claims that men do not get similarly scrutinized for their body.

00:13:56.100 Is that right?

00:13:59.740 Men do not get similarly scrutinized for their bodies.

00:14:05.340 Oh, let's ask Chris Christie.

00:14:08.360 Hey, Chris Christie, has anybody ever said anything that seemed a little negative at all about your body type?

00:14:16.480 I think so.

00:14:18.200 Has anybody ever said anything negative about my physicality? 0.99

00:14:22.600 Are you fucking kidding me? 0.98

00:14:26.100 How about every day? 0.99

00:14:28.800 Literally every day.

00:14:30.820 Yeah.

00:14:31.820 Everything.

00:14:32.620 You know, height, your hairline, you know, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.

00:14:36.620 You name it.

00:14:37.180 How often do you, let's see, let's check the headlines. 0.99

00:14:46.300 Let's see, there's a headline about Will Smith where he's accused of having a small penis. 0.99

00:14:53.020 That's actually in the news today. 0.99

00:14:56.900 That's actually in the news.

00:14:58.100 Now, by the way, I'm not saying it's true because the source is very undependable.

00:15:02.160 We'll get to a completely undependable source.

00:15:05.720 But that's in the news.

00:15:07.860 So if I check the news, I see Chris Christie being called overweight.

00:15:11.540 I see Will Smith being humiliated about something that's probably not true in the first place.

00:15:16.660 And it seems universal.

00:15:21.360 Do you know why Billie Eilish doesn't know that men are continually scrutinized for their appearance? 0.99

00:15:29.160 Because nobody gives a shit about men. 0.99

00:15:31.980 Am I right? 0.99

00:15:33.460 You don't even notice.

00:15:34.760 Insulting men is such a baseline activity that it doesn't even catch your attention.

00:15:43.420 But at least women, when you insult them for their physicality, at least they make some news. 1.00

00:15:49.980 It makes some news.

00:15:51.560 For men, it's just business as usual. 0.91

00:15:53.660 You have no idea.

00:15:55.300 Let me say this to you, Billie Eilish.

00:15:57.060 And by the way, I'm defending you for, I think this news report is a little rough.

00:16:01.300 But, and this is not an insult.

00:16:05.420 This is almost a universal statement.

00:16:08.680 Wouldn't you agree that men have no idea what it's like to be a woman?

00:16:13.060 Everybody agree with that?

00:16:14.640 Men, you know you have no idea, right?

00:16:17.300 Not even the slightest idea what it's like to experience life as a woman.

00:16:23.140 But do women have any idea what it's like to experience life as a man? 0.96

00:16:27.820 It's the same.

00:16:29.540 It's like, you know, can a white guy know what it's like to experience life as a black guy?

00:16:35.240 No.

00:16:36.500 No, there is no way you can do that.

00:16:38.660 And vice versa.

00:16:41.380 So, Billie Eilish, I think you have a blind spot about men.

00:16:49.500 But I appreciate your opinion anyway.

00:16:51.200 If you haven't seen it, I've got a pinned tweet on my top 10 holiday gifts.

00:16:57.680 I have this idea that the best gift recommendation is stuff that you've owned for a long time and you don't have any economic interest in.

00:17:07.740 Isn't that the best recommendation?

00:17:11.100 Because I hate a recommendation where there's a new product and then somebody opens it up and talks about it.

00:17:17.200 Because new, you really don't know anything about it.

00:17:20.180 I mean, you've got to use it for a year before you know if you hate it or love it.

00:17:25.080 So I gave you 10 recommendations of things, two of them are my books.

00:17:28.980 But the other eight are just things I own and have owned for a long time.

00:17:33.060 Such as my coffee warmer and a thing that I use to fill up my tires.

00:17:38.520 And a bunch of stuff you might be interested in that just makes good gift stuff.

00:17:43.180 And people ask me what kind of electronic drum set I use.

00:17:46.460 And people ask me what kind of equipment I use for podcasting.

00:17:50.300 So both of those are there as gift ideas.

00:17:53.320 You might know somebody who wants to be a podcaster.

00:17:55.800 Might be a teen who wants to just get into it or something.

00:17:59.080 And you can buy them a little.

00:18:00.340 I show you what to get for the minimum setup.

00:18:04.180 So you might like that.

00:18:05.740 All right, here's a question for you.

00:18:07.400 How many Americans say the economy is not on the wrong track?

00:18:14.520 Let's see how smart you are.

00:18:16.460 You could probably get this within, I don't know, a few percentage points.

00:18:20.160 But according to Fannie Mae, what percentage of Americans don't think we're on the wrong track?

00:18:27.020 Very good guess.

00:18:28.000 Very good guess.

00:18:28.860 It's 78 said we're on the wrong track.

00:18:32.620 So 100 minus 78 is 22.

00:18:37.880 22, exactly.

00:18:39.060 Yeah, nearly a quarter of people.

00:18:41.660 It's amazing that you could guess that.

00:18:44.640 Like, are you all geniuses or something?

00:18:47.580 How do you always know the answers before I even ask you the question?

00:18:50.600 It's shocking how smart you are.

00:18:53.660 If you're new to this live stream, I hope you're impressed about the other people watching.

00:19:00.400 Look how often they got that answer right.

00:19:02.900 Pretty good.

00:19:03.600 Pretty good.

00:19:06.400 Well, once again, more confirmation that, you know, the economists for, I don't know,

00:19:14.460 over a year or so were saying there's going to be this big old recession and a hard landing.

00:19:19.800 And that's what the experts pretty much, by consensus, were saying there's going to be some recession-y thing.

00:19:27.820 And that, and you wouldn't see inflation dropping down fast enough to save it.

00:19:34.420 But now the current opinion is that we're expecting a soft landing and inflation is way too slowly, but is coming down.

00:19:43.980 And the stock market responded to that.

00:19:46.820 Now, this is a case again of Scott beats the experts.

00:19:52.140 Can you remember anyone except me predicting that we would have a soft landing or, you know, we'd do fine?

00:19:59.360 Did you hear any other person making that prediction a year and a half ago?

00:20:05.800 I'm the only one.

00:20:07.040 I don't think I heard even one person say that we'd probably make it through fine.

00:20:13.520 Best prediction of the year?

00:20:14.680 So I do have the best economic prediction of the year.

00:20:17.860 If you can find somebody else who said the same thing, then I'll give them credit.

00:20:21.680 But I don't know anybody else who said the same thing.

00:20:24.600 So put that on my permanent list of what I get right and what I got wrong.

00:20:29.880 I'll remind you I don't get everything right.

00:20:32.820 But there are some categories that I get right more than often, more right than often.

00:20:37.700 The things I get wrong are things that are purely political because that's not my domain.

00:20:45.440 So, for example, when somebody picks a vice president, I'm terrible at guessing that because that's just purely political, right?

00:20:53.920 There's too many things behind the scenes that you don't know about.

00:20:56.640 You can't really predict that.

00:20:58.120 But I'm pretty good at telling you when a mass hysteria is a mass hysteria because that's one of my domains.

00:21:04.380 I'm pretty good with economics and business because that's my education and background.

00:21:11.620 And if you see me get out of my domains, you should immediately lower your impression of my predictions.

00:21:19.820 So when I talk about UFOs being fake, that's my domain.

00:21:25.660 That's well within my level of good guessing.

00:21:29.760 So I'm probably right about that, that the UFOs are fake.

00:21:34.380 But, all right, what else is going on?

00:21:38.140 So Nikki Haley trying very hard to completely destroy any chance she would have to be president. 0.95

00:21:46.560 She's saying of Vivek, you know, Nikki Haley and Vivek are going back and forth.

00:21:51.220 And she said on a podcast that Vivek might have a girl problem.

00:21:55.180 In other words, his problem criticizing Nikki Haley is because he's a sexist.

00:22:01.180 Who says that?

00:22:06.000 That's Hillary Clinton. 1.00

00:22:08.520 Do you know who doesn't say bullshit like this? 1.00

00:22:12.780 A Republican. 1.00

00:22:14.940 How do you run as a Republican by acting like a Democrat as hard as you can?

00:22:20.400 Now, is that my only example in which she's acting like a Democrat? 1.00

00:22:23.440 No.

00:22:23.940 No.

00:22:25.580 She seems quite willing to fund the forever wars.

00:22:30.040 Now, that's, unfortunately, you know, sort of the military-industrial complex.

00:22:34.720 So that's neither Democrat nor Republican.

00:22:37.260 But you know what it's not?

00:22:39.300 It's not purely Republican.

00:22:40.580 So her military opinions fit both Democrat or Republican.

00:22:48.060 You know, there's a big majority of both.

00:22:50.780 And now she's got this girl power comment that is pure Hillary Clinton. 1.00

00:22:55.840 And that's the opposite of Republican, honestly.

00:22:58.700 It's just the opposite of Republican.

00:22:59.980 And then, now she's got this idea that every person on social media should be verified by their name.

00:23:08.760 And all the platforms should show their algorithms.

00:23:12.960 Here's what Elon Musk said to a news report that Nikki Haley wanted everybody to be verified by their name.

00:23:21.800 So giving up privacy on social media.

00:23:24.840 Musk posts, super messed up.

00:23:27.660 She can stop pretending to run for president now. 0.99

00:23:32.100 I think, god damn it, he's just so good at using his own platform. 0.98

00:23:39.540 It's kind of crazy that he's good at this. 0.98

00:23:43.240 He's good at too many things.

00:23:44.860 It's kind of bothering me.

00:23:46.360 Musk is.

00:23:47.220 He's just so good at a lot of things.

00:23:49.400 But the fact that he'd be good at building businesses, but also good at the small communication chunks.

00:23:56.480 You shouldn't be so good at so many things.

00:23:59.340 That's a lot of things to be good at.

00:24:01.500 Anyway, I think he summed it up.

00:24:04.560 There's no way you could take her seriously as a Republican candidate.

00:24:07.920 Would you agree with that?

00:24:09.700 Even if there's something you liked about her, would you agree that she's out of the race now? 1.00

00:24:15.300 As soon as you go sexist, remember I called this out early.

00:24:18.440 I called her out as a sexist early. 1.00

00:24:22.060 It was obvious from the beginning.

00:24:24.260 There's no way you're going to put a misandri-ist, someone who's got a feeling about men. 1.00

00:24:35.400 There's no way you're going to elect that as a Republican.

00:24:38.160 It's literally as close to the opposite of being a Republican as you could possibly get.

00:24:42.560 So what's the Republican part?

00:24:46.080 She wants more government restrictions on social media.

00:24:53.360 And she wants to spend her money on wars. 1.00

00:24:58.060 And she wants to complain about woke bullshit. 1.00

00:25:03.360 She's not even close to being a Republican. 1.00

00:25:05.520 It's crazy.

00:25:06.580 How could she even be in the conversation?

00:25:09.340 I don't understand it.

00:25:10.280 Well, I do understand it.

00:25:12.740 You know, women are always going to support women. 1.00

00:25:16.040 And, you know, I get that.

00:25:18.020 Everybody wants somebody that's on their team to do well.

00:25:23.100 All right.

00:25:23.780 Here's a, you know, the big money companies are reported to be buying up single-family starter homes all over the country.

00:25:33.780 And I didn't know how big this trend is, but apparently it's beyond enormous.

00:25:38.440 Now, what do you make of the fact that the big hedge funds and the big money people are buying up massive amounts of private homes?

00:25:49.360 Now, the starter type that you can rent.

00:25:52.340 Now, what do you make of that?

00:25:53.660 Why would they do that now when home prices are so high?

00:26:00.780 Why would the smartest money people buy the assets that are wildly overpriced, it looks like?

00:26:09.000 Because real estate's really high compared to ability to buy.

00:26:12.260 All right.

00:26:13.920 I'm going to give you a financial look at this that you haven't heard before.

00:26:21.640 And it's also going to tell you what to do in your own financial situation.

00:26:27.600 All right.

00:26:28.220 Number one, real estate is a good inflation hedge.

00:26:32.600 Would you agree?

00:26:33.260 Because the price of a physical asset will move with inflation, as long as people still want it.

00:26:40.500 And people will always want housing.

00:26:43.360 So if you put it in anything else, it could be risky.

00:26:48.020 But homes, you know there's going to be a shortage of them.

00:26:51.340 And you know that people will rent them.

00:26:54.260 It does look like a safe place to part money.

00:26:56.900 But do you think they're doing it just because it's safe and just because it's a potential inflation hedge?

00:27:04.000 That's not enough.

00:27:05.920 It's not enough.

00:27:07.680 Here's another reason to do it.

00:27:09.220 So this will be a little lesson on business models and how business people see stuff.

00:27:13.700 In my opinion, one of the biggest problems in America is all the red tape and regulations about getting anything done in business.

00:27:21.400 You've heard Elon Musk talk about, you know, the size.

00:27:24.660 If you put all the regulations he has to satisfy from every country, if you put them in a pile, it would be, you know, the size of the ceiling.

00:27:33.800 Now, imagine that in the world of building and construction.

00:27:38.940 You know, the 50 states and their different recommendations and they just get tighter and tighter and it's harder and harder to build.

00:27:44.820 I built my own home in my town and by far the hardest part was getting it approved.

00:27:53.180 And why was it a problem to get it approved?

00:27:55.260 Was I building some kind of strange, crazy, dangerous house?

00:27:59.060 No.

00:28:00.200 It wasn't really any reason.

00:28:01.580 It's just that the process, the paperwork is just so unbearable, you can barely get it done.

00:28:07.860 So, the other thing that's brilliant about this is knowing that paperwork and complexity is increasing, so it's really, really going to be hard for somebody to build new homes.

00:28:21.880 So, they're predicting, I think it's a prediction, that the government will be so incompetent that it won't allow enough home building to satisfy demand.

00:28:33.360 Is that a smart bet by the smartest money people in the world?

00:28:37.400 That the government will remain incompetent and maybe even get worse and therefore the supply of homes can never keep up with the demand?

00:28:45.540 That's a good bet.

00:28:47.580 That is a good bet right there.

00:28:50.720 So, you've got the inflation hedge and you've got the fact that the supply and demand are kind of perfect because it's hard to imagine a situation where the government suddenly approves.

00:29:03.960 Improves to the point where they're like, oh, these are all unnecessary regulations.

00:29:07.840 You know, let us spur development by getting rid of these.

00:29:10.960 It's just not going to happen.

00:29:12.960 But, there is a stronger reason for buying single person homes and I've never heard anybody say it and in my opinion, it's the strongest reason.

00:29:26.060 And here it comes.

00:29:29.020 Robots can't own property.

00:29:30.720 That's everything you need to know about the future of investing.

00:29:36.900 Robots can't own property.

00:29:39.760 But you know what they can do?

00:29:41.540 They can take your hourly wage job and will.

00:29:46.460 So, if you're working for a salary and your main economic engine is working for a paycheck, you're in serious trouble.

00:29:57.140 But, if you own any kind of property, you have an advantage that no robot can meet, and we hope the government will keep it this way, that robots can't own property.

00:30:10.500 So, owning a home you can rent guarantees you have something that humans will want in the future, because real estate is limited, and now housing is limited, and robots can't own them.

00:30:23.260 So, if you own something that somebody has to rent, because they have no choice, they've got to live, then you've got something that's robot-proof.

00:30:31.680 If you're working for a salary, you are not robot-proof.

00:30:34.860 You're very vulnerable to robots.

00:30:36.760 So, if you're hugely rich, you buy single-family homes.

00:30:42.340 What do you do if you're not hugely rich?

00:30:45.640 Well, here's how I would orient my thinking.

00:30:49.820 Orient your thinking toward ownership, toward getting a hold of an asset.

00:30:55.100 Now, in the context of a business, it might be that you own trucks that people rent to do something.

00:31:04.040 You might own assets that no robot could ever own that get some job done.

00:31:12.480 So, think in terms of a physical thing you can own that doesn't depreciate.

00:31:17.500 Real estate actually appreciates in value while you can depreciate it on paper.

00:31:22.220 It's the ultimate.

00:31:24.060 So, look for things that don't depreciate, can be rented, and can become your future financial thing.

00:31:31.920 I mean, it might be, you've seen these little homes now that can kind of deliver and just plop in one place,

00:31:41.040 and maybe it's $100,000, but then you can rent it.

00:31:44.820 I would look into that.

00:31:46.420 Like, if you can pull together enough to put an ADU in the backyard, that might be your only income at some point.

00:31:54.760 So, think about that.

00:31:55.880 Now, the working against it is that maybe nobody will have any money to rent anything.

00:32:00.900 So, but think about the robot future.

00:32:06.360 Make sure you own something, because robots can't own something.

00:32:10.100 That's the only defense.

00:32:12.300 Now, the way I do it is owning an intellectual property.

00:32:15.580 So, I own the, you know, the rights to Dilbert.

00:32:21.540 But, you know, at some point, I suppose the robots and AI will write a comic that's, you know, funnier and free.

00:32:28.460 So, I can't last forever.

00:32:30.660 But I do think ownership is going to last for a while.

00:32:34.580 All right.

00:32:35.240 President Xi has arrived.

00:32:36.980 And there's some video of him showing off.

00:32:42.080 And I thought it was, you know, you should be a little bit more polite if you're visiting somebody's country.

00:32:48.720 So, President Xi is visiting San Francisco.

00:32:54.100 And the video of him arriving shows him at the top of the steps from his airplane.

00:33:00.460 And then Xi is walking down the steps. 0.67

00:33:03.360 And it's gross. 0.94

00:33:05.200 It's gross.

00:33:05.860 Let me do my impression of him walking down the steps.

00:33:08.540 And I'm, like, really put off by it.

00:33:11.720 It goes like this.

00:33:15.540 Hello, everybody.

00:33:16.920 Hello, everybody.

00:33:17.700 And I'm sickened.

00:33:18.600 I'm sickened by it.

00:33:20.020 Because to show off like that in front of our president, our president who can't walk on the downstairs,

00:33:27.440 and he's like, look at me.

00:33:30.000 I can walk down the stairs.

00:33:31.680 No problem.

00:33:33.360 Look at this.

00:33:34.260 And I'm, like, oh, that's so gross. 0.80

00:33:37.480 That's so gross. 0.93

00:33:38.240 You could be a little bit more polite as an invited guest. 0.97

00:33:42.220 I would expect, you know, it had to be me.

00:33:45.080 I would have slipped a little bit.

00:33:47.560 You know?

00:33:48.300 Because you like to make...

00:33:49.940 You've seen our leaders visit other countries, right?

00:33:52.880 And sometimes they'll even wear the local ceremonial clothing.

00:33:58.920 I mean, he should have at least, like, slipped on the third one, like, oh, ha, ha, ha, oh, good.

00:34:04.480 And then we could do some pacing and leading, and then they could make a deal.

00:34:09.360 But I think he blew his big chance there by just walking down the stairs.

00:34:13.120 Apparently, they've already agreed on some kind of limits on using AI on the nuclear weapons arsenal.

00:34:25.120 And people are saying it might be a bad idea.

00:34:28.220 To which I think, restricting AI from deciding to launch nuclear weapons might be the simplest decision any human ever made.

00:34:38.440 Why are we arguing about that one?

00:34:42.160 You know, first of all, it should be obvious.

00:34:44.060 I can't imagine any country would want to put AI onto their nuclear weapons in a way that would make them launch themselves or be unpredictable.

00:34:54.460 So, I guess that's an easy one.

00:34:58.880 Now, as you know, the streets of San Francisco were cleaned up.

00:35:02.420 Now, you may not know that the homeless and also all of the excrement from the sidewalks, they were temporarily moved to Oakland.

00:35:14.480 And once President Xi is gone, then the homeless will be repatriated back.

00:35:20.120 They'll take the feces and return it back to the sidewalks of San Francisco, repatriating the feces. 0.54

00:35:27.180 And that's the plan.

00:35:28.300 Now, that was literally a joke I wrote yesterday for my comic, Robots Read News, that you can only see on the locals' platform.

00:35:38.080 But I saw a tweet today that suggested they really did move the homeless to Oakland.

00:35:45.300 Can anybody confirm that?

00:35:47.400 Did anybody see a news story in which, in the real world, they actually moved the homeless to Oakland?

00:35:53.680 I just want to make sure that really happened.

00:35:55.560 And you know why that would be funny?

00:36:00.040 Because it's the only place you could move them that's close that they couldn't walk back.

00:36:05.780 Because you can't walk over that bridge.

00:36:08.660 So, they're putting them on the other side of the bay.

00:36:11.880 If they put them anywhere in the south bay, they would just walk back.

00:36:17.100 So, they had to make it hard.

00:36:22.160 Anyway.

00:36:24.360 More details on this Trump trial about the valuations of his properties that the government, or the DA, says he overvalued.

00:36:32.640 So, Don Jr. has testified now, and I guess the accountants have or will testify.

00:36:38.400 But here's where that trial is going.

00:36:40.040 It won't be clear who came up with the estimates.

00:36:45.800 Because I think the Trumps are all saying, well, we didn't come up with that estimate.

00:36:50.180 Or, you know, that was just conversation.

00:36:52.860 And then the accountants are like, well, we don't come up with estimates.

00:36:56.660 You know, we just take your word for it.

00:36:58.700 So, it's actually, so far the trial has been unable to identify anybody who came up with the estimates.

00:37:08.860 Like, where did they come from?

00:37:10.460 The most basic fact in the trial is, who came up with the estimates?

00:37:16.040 And they don't seem to be able to determine that.

00:37:19.200 So, what do you do if you're trying to decide on the merits of the case,

00:37:23.980 and they can't determine where it even came from?

00:37:26.880 Because if it came from the accountants, then the Trumps are innocent.

00:37:32.480 If it came from Trump, it would depend how he said it.

00:37:36.840 You know, was it just an opinion?

00:37:38.520 Or, you know, did somebody hear him say something once and made too much of it?

00:37:45.800 Rose says, Rose Blindstein,

00:37:49.320 Scott, this isn't smart.

00:37:53.080 Well, Rose, when I want to know what's smart,

00:37:56.880 I ask you.

00:37:59.660 So, please do tell me.

00:38:02.840 Or you could just act like a Democrat

00:38:04.640 and say there's something wrong with me

00:38:07.020 instead of the content of my discussion.

00:38:09.760 All of my trolls this morning seem legitimately drunk.

00:38:17.320 Like, actually, literally, just drunk.

00:38:20.560 You should see the comments I got this morning.

00:38:22.920 Every one of them, I could just say,

00:38:24.540 drinking?

00:38:26.200 And they just stop.

00:38:28.200 Because I think that's actually, literally, I think that's what's going on.

00:38:31.120 I didn't talk about this when it happened,

00:38:37.240 but I'm still blown away that the attempt to impeach Mayorkas

00:38:42.000 for his bad handling of the border failed.

00:38:46.580 And it failed because some Republicans,

00:38:49.100 you know, I guess eight of them,

00:38:50.700 decided not to.

00:38:52.140 What exactly was the argument for not impeaching him?

00:38:57.760 Did anybody even have an argument?

00:39:00.220 Somehow, I follow the news and never saw anybody say

00:39:03.160 why they voted to not impeach him.

00:39:06.480 Because to me, that's just a slam dunk.

00:39:09.100 That's the most obvious impeachment I've ever seen.

00:39:13.040 Now, is it just because he was following orders?

00:39:16.540 You know, maybe.

00:39:17.400 Maybe because he was following orders?

00:39:21.660 I don't know.

00:39:22.340 That one just baffles me how that went.

00:39:25.860 I suppose that's a follow-the-money situation, right?

00:39:29.160 Is that one of those you assume corruption

00:39:31.040 on some of the eight Republicans?

00:39:40.160 Yeah, you think the cartels bought off the Republicans?

00:39:45.600 Here's what I'd say.

00:39:46.520 If you've seen news reports

00:39:48.360 in which the Republicans who voted against it

00:39:51.360 gave you a reason for it,

00:39:54.480 this sounds like a real reason.

00:39:55.940 Even if you don't agree with it,

00:39:57.860 does it sound like a real reason?

00:40:00.380 Because I don't know that anybody offered a real reason.

00:40:04.160 Did they?

00:40:05.820 Oh, it was trivializing impeachment.

00:40:08.000 Is that what it was?

00:40:10.180 This doesn't look trivial to me.

00:40:11.880 To me, the open border and the destruction of the United States

00:40:17.020 is like a peak concern.

00:40:21.100 Anyway, I don't understand that one,

00:40:22.820 so I'm going to assume corruption.

00:40:23.720 Assume corruption.

00:40:26.680 Poor Glenn Greenwald,

00:40:28.160 by refusing to be on a team

00:40:33.500 and just calling things like he sees them.

00:40:36.040 He's getting quite a bit of pushback.

00:40:39.120 So I guess he's not as...

00:40:40.940 I guess he's insufficiently pro-Israel,

00:40:43.140 so he's getting a lot of pushback.

00:40:45.560 Anyway, I told you there's the Will Smith rumors,

00:40:47.840 but the bigger part of it is that his former assistant,

00:40:53.520 who's allegedly his former best friend,

00:40:56.520 claims that he walked in and watched Will Smith 1.00

00:41:00.940 as, let's say, the recipient of some vigorous gay sex. 0.99

00:41:04.960 Now, what have I told you about celebrity news? 1.00

00:41:12.080 Can you tell me?

00:41:14.120 What have I told you about celebrity news?

00:41:16.440 Because it's actually never real.

00:41:20.100 It's so far from being real

00:41:22.000 that your opinion of this story

00:41:24.420 should be that you didn't hear any story at all.

00:41:28.020 The quality of the credibility of this story

00:41:31.440 is in the category of things

00:41:33.980 that never turn out to be true.

00:41:36.420 And in fact, Will Smith is threatening

00:41:37.980 to sue him for saying it,

00:41:40.780 which would be sort of a baller move

00:41:44.160 if it were true.

00:41:46.440 Now, I'm not saying it couldn't be true,

00:41:49.780 but that would be true of every human being.

00:41:52.100 There could be something they're doing

00:41:53.460 that you don't know about and don't care.

00:41:55.020 And by the way, let me say as carefully

00:41:57.460 and clearly as I can,

00:41:59.440 I don't care.

00:42:02.280 Apparently, he was behind a locked door.

00:42:04.400 That's the accusation.

00:42:05.780 So if it were true, it would have no meaning

00:42:08.280 in any of our lives.

00:42:09.280 It would just be his personal life.

00:42:11.640 So I don't care about it.

00:42:14.160 But I'm going to back Will Smith on this one

00:42:17.560 and say that you should assume it's not true.

00:42:22.240 And it's because it's in a category

00:42:24.080 of celebrity public figure accusations

00:42:27.160 that generally are not true.

00:42:30.260 You could usually bet against them and be correct.

00:42:32.880 So I don't know what's true,

00:42:34.160 but I'm definitely going with

00:42:36.980 innocent until proven guilty on this.

00:42:39.340 So I'm pro Will Smith

00:42:41.400 on the don't believe accusations like that.

00:42:46.200 Now, in this case, it comes from a named source.

00:42:48.720 So that gives it more credibility.

00:42:52.440 But I'd certainly wait to hear

00:42:54.720 at least one other source.

00:42:57.860 This is the type where

00:42:59.460 if you're two or three people

00:43:01.340 who are close to him say,

00:43:02.740 yeah, we all knew it or something like that,

00:43:05.100 then maybe.

00:43:06.840 But one person

00:43:07.900 who doesn't work for him anymore,

00:43:11.560 which gets you to potentially disgruntled,

00:43:14.000 we don't know,

00:43:15.180 and he's getting a lot of attention for it.

00:43:17.080 But that's a red flag.

00:43:20.960 So I would say

00:43:22.900 don't believe this one.

00:43:26.020 Target has a new Santa Claus you can buy.

00:43:31.540 So if you'd like to get

00:43:32.360 a little Santa Claus decoration,

00:43:33.920 they've now got one that's super inclusive.

00:43:36.920 It's intersectional.

00:43:37.940 They've got a black disabled Santa. 0.99

00:43:42.760 Black disabled Santa. 0.99

00:43:45.480 Well, black's fine, 0.99

00:43:46.660 but disabled. 0.98

00:43:49.440 Now, you're starting to stretch my disbelief.

00:43:53.320 I already find it difficult to believe

00:43:55.740 that Santa can fit down the chimney.

00:44:00.020 I mean, already I've got a problem with it.

00:44:02.300 I don't know about the math

00:44:03.940 of getting to every house in one night.

00:44:06.860 The flying reindeer,

00:44:08.540 especially the one that can light the way

00:44:10.340 with its glowing nose.

00:44:14.120 I believe all of that stuff.

00:44:16.120 All right.

00:44:16.420 I believe all of that.

00:44:17.860 But how do you get a wheelchair down the chimney? 1.00

00:44:21.000 That's too far.

00:44:22.080 Too far.

00:44:23.980 Now you're starting to make me question

00:44:26.400 whether Santa's real at all.

00:44:29.580 All right.

00:44:30.120 What do you think about the issue of,

00:44:35.160 I think this was a Rasmussen,

00:44:37.440 about abortion?

00:44:41.140 Apparently,

00:44:43.240 there's a 10-point advantage of Democrats

00:44:46.740 in, quote,

00:44:47.980 handling abortion.

00:44:49.040 Do you think abortion's going to be

00:44:50.880 a big topic for this election?

00:44:57.280 Or do you think that

00:44:58.360 kicking it back to the states

00:45:00.180 takes it a little bit off the,

00:45:04.260 at least the federal level?

00:45:07.400 I don't know.

00:45:07.940 I think it's going to matter.

00:45:09.500 I think it's going to matter a lot.

00:45:11.480 But we'll see.

00:45:12.040 It is probably the biggest thing

00:45:17.400 that the Democrats have an advantage on.

00:45:22.360 All right.

00:45:23.540 21% don't think abortion will be important.

00:45:27.680 21%.

00:45:28.120 That's getting pretty close to one quarter.

00:45:33.120 All right.

00:45:33.940 So the big news is

00:45:35.320 you can now tell

00:45:36.860 what the Democrats' approach will be

00:45:38.820 to the election in terms of Trump.

00:45:40.560 if Trump is the nominee.

00:45:43.900 They're preparing what I call

00:45:45.320 the big lie version 2.0.

00:45:47.880 I'm going to see if I can label it that.

00:45:49.940 I'm going to try to make that a thing.

00:45:51.400 The big lie version 2.0

00:45:53.100 is, first of all,

00:45:54.080 you know that the Democrats said

00:45:55.840 that Trump had the big lie.

00:45:59.540 And the big lie was that

00:46:00.760 the election was rigged.

00:46:02.160 So that was their branding.

00:46:04.200 But, of course, for Republicans

00:46:05.740 and people who are not brainwashed,

00:46:08.680 the big lie was

00:46:09.860 the insurrection claim itself

00:46:11.500 and the claim that Trump

00:46:13.300 is a dictator by nature

00:46:15.320 and had no intention

00:46:18.360 of turning over power

00:46:19.460 no matter what

00:46:20.240 and that he was basically

00:46:23.260 Hitler and waiting. 0.94

00:46:24.880 So they're starting to

00:46:26.740 roll the sound again.

00:46:28.580 So here are the early signs.

00:46:31.360 So there's Bill Pasquale, Jr.

00:46:33.300 He's a congressperson

00:46:35.940 in New Jersey, I think.

00:46:39.260 And he actually tweeted this

00:46:42.220 with a picture of like a tank

00:46:43.540 with a Trump sign on it.

00:46:45.060 He goes,

00:46:45.580 Donald Trump is openly planning

00:46:47.340 to impose a military dictatorship.

00:46:50.680 Really?

00:46:52.540 Where is he openly doing that?

00:46:54.400 And put tanks in the streets

00:46:57.620 against his enemies

00:46:58.580 if he sees his power again.

00:47:01.060 I'm going to post this repeatedly

00:47:02.580 so no one can say

00:47:03.940 they haven't been told.

00:47:06.680 Now,

00:47:08.040 correct me if I'm wrong.

00:47:12.040 Isn't one of the charges,

00:47:13.680 maybe it's not anymore,

00:47:15.040 against Trump

00:47:15.780 that he, quote,

00:47:17.100 incited violence on January 6th?

00:47:20.120 Isn't that a thing

00:47:21.400 that you can get in trouble

00:47:23.280 for inciting violence?

00:47:27.080 Is Bill Pasquale, Jr.

00:47:29.100 not inciting violence

00:47:30.520 by lying

00:47:34.100 and saying that it's obvious

00:47:35.720 that Trump is going to be Hitler?

00:47:38.920 Calling somebody Hitler,

00:47:40.940 if you mean it,

00:47:42.400 like you're not just exaggerating

00:47:44.160 in an obvious way,

00:47:45.320 this suggests he means it

00:47:47.200 in a literal way.

00:47:48.240 If you're telling somebody

00:47:50.460 that a politician

00:47:51.600 who has a good chance

00:47:53.080 of being elected,

00:47:53.940 likely to be, actually,

00:47:55.680 if you're telling

00:47:56.360 half of the country

00:47:57.340 that he's literally Hitler, 0.90

00:48:00.320 as opposed to

00:48:01.520 in some hyperbolic way,

00:48:03.540 you're inciting violence.

00:48:05.040 How else can you see it?

00:48:07.500 This is basically

00:48:08.460 telling Democrats 1.00

00:48:09.500 it's okay to kill Republicans. 1.00

00:48:12.620 That's how I take it. 1.00

00:48:14.260 If they were to believe

00:48:15.560 this to be literally true,

00:48:17.060 and he's selling it

00:48:18.640 as literally true.

00:48:20.120 He's very careful

00:48:20.920 to make sure you know

00:48:22.500 he means literally.

00:48:25.320 Right?

00:48:26.180 If that's the actual message,

00:48:28.480 and it looks like it is,

00:48:30.060 that is inciting violence.

00:48:32.520 I don't see any other way.

00:48:33.700 He should be immediately

00:48:35.100 impeached.

00:48:37.640 Is that not grounds

00:48:40.600 for impeachment?

00:48:43.640 He's literally,

00:48:44.740 he's trying to create

00:48:46.260 an insurrection.

00:48:47.920 He's literally inciting

00:48:49.280 an insurrection

00:48:49.880 in a way far more

00:48:51.800 than Trump did.

00:48:53.320 I mean,

00:48:53.540 Trump never came close

00:48:54.940 to this.

00:48:57.180 Would you agree

00:48:57.880 that Trump never came close

00:48:59.360 to this level

00:49:00.580 of inciting violence?

00:49:02.460 Fair?

00:49:02.920 Is that your opinion as well,

00:49:05.880 or am I going too far on that?

00:49:07.640 To me,

00:49:08.100 it's obvious

00:49:08.600 that these are not even

00:49:09.880 in the same ballpark.

00:49:11.620 Trump was literally saying

00:49:12.960 protest,

00:49:14.080 you know,

00:49:14.380 peacefully.

00:49:15.840 Like,

00:49:16.400 literally in those words.

00:49:18.420 And here he's telling you

00:49:19.480 that this Hitler-like dictator 0.85

00:49:21.920 is going to have tanks

00:49:22.720 in the street.

00:49:23.820 What would be

00:49:24.400 the reasonable response

00:49:26.300 if you believe

00:49:27.480 this were true?

00:49:28.700 The reasonable response

00:49:30.020 would be violence

00:49:30.900 if he got elected.

00:49:33.540 You know,

00:49:33.680 before then

00:49:34.280 it would be,

00:49:35.300 you know,

00:49:35.540 vote against him.

00:49:37.600 But you're setting it up

00:49:38.820 for if he wins

00:49:39.840 and the polls say he will,

00:49:41.940 you're basically

00:49:43.260 giving the green light

00:49:45.260 to violence

00:49:45.940 because everybody thinks

00:49:47.620 that violence against Hitler

00:49:48.720 is appropriate.

00:49:50.060 Everybody.

00:49:53.400 All right,

00:49:54.000 so that's the

00:49:54.640 big lie version two.

00:49:56.500 Now,

00:49:56.920 here's how the

00:49:57.840 Republicans,

00:49:59.140 and Trump in particular,

00:50:00.500 should respond

00:50:01.220 to the big lie.

00:50:03.620 There's three things

00:50:04.680 that don't work.

00:50:06.160 I'll list those first.

00:50:07.800 If they say

00:50:08.460 you're going to be a dictator

00:50:09.420 and take over the country, 0.58

00:50:10.640 here's what doesn't work.

00:50:12.760 Ignoring it.

00:50:14.600 Doesn't work to ignore it.

00:50:16.820 Does not work.

00:50:18.700 Number two,

00:50:20.100 saying your side is worse.

00:50:22.880 You're the real Hitlers.

00:50:25.000 Does not work

00:50:25.960 because the other side

00:50:27.480 is completely,

00:50:29.040 you know,

00:50:29.380 they can't hear you

00:50:30.400 coming from the Republican side.

00:50:33.860 Third thing that doesn't work

00:50:35.280 is being extra nice

00:50:36.740 so that it's really

00:50:38.320 super obvious

00:50:39.080 you're not Hitler.

00:50:40.780 Doesn't work

00:50:41.660 because the other side

00:50:43.360 controls the media.

00:50:44.840 So they'll just,

00:50:46.120 they'll just invent things

00:50:47.780 that make you look like Hitler.

00:50:49.140 Even if you're

00:50:49.980 the nicest person

00:50:50.920 in the world

00:50:51.420 and you did the most

00:50:52.800 anti-Hitler things

00:50:53.880 you could ever do,

00:50:54.620 won't make any difference.

00:50:56.320 There is only one thing

00:50:57.460 that can work.

00:50:58.960 You have to mock 1.00

00:51:00.000 this bullshit 1.00

00:51:00.820 out of existence. 1.00

00:51:03.920 You have to mock

00:51:04.840 the January 6th people

00:51:06.340 who believe

00:51:07.420 that Republicans

00:51:08.240 take over countries

00:51:09.360 without bringing guns.

00:51:11.000 You have to mock

00:51:11.840 anybody who thinks

00:51:12.560 that trespassing

00:51:13.380 is the first step

00:51:14.280 to an overthrow.

00:51:16.220 You have to mock

00:51:17.160 anybody who thinks

00:51:18.100 that delaying a process

00:51:19.900 in one building

00:51:20.860 for one day

00:51:21.740 somehow takes over

00:51:24.240 a country.

00:51:24.680 You have to mock

00:51:26.300 them for thinking

00:51:27.060 that having

00:51:27.740 alternate electors

00:51:30.120 somehow is a takeover

00:51:32.240 of the country.

00:51:33.340 You have to mock

00:51:34.280 them for the fact

00:51:35.440 that Don Jr.,

00:51:36.820 according to the documents

00:51:38.180 we've seen on January 6th,

00:51:39.920 was completely unaware

00:51:41.240 that there was some kind

00:51:43.000 of insurrection planned.

00:51:44.620 Don Jr.

00:51:46.060 If there's one fact

00:51:47.540 that you can take

00:51:48.400 to the bank

00:51:49.060 that proves

00:51:50.360 there was no

00:51:51.380 planned insurrection,

00:51:52.480 it's Don Jr.'s

00:51:54.680 private messaging

00:51:55.480 in which he very

00:51:56.740 obviously was not

00:51:57.760 part of any kind

00:51:58.560 of even conversation

00:52:00.140 about some kind

00:52:01.740 of an insurrection.

00:52:03.120 Right?

00:52:03.440 If you know Don Jr.

00:52:04.880 didn't know about it,

00:52:06.760 it wasn't there.

00:52:09.700 I mean,

00:52:10.240 that's the minimum.

00:52:11.620 The minimum would be

00:52:13.080 for President Trump

00:52:14.860 to get Don Jr.

00:52:15.960 on the same side.

00:52:17.520 You can't even imagine

00:52:18.880 a scenario in which

00:52:19.940 he would try to

00:52:20.940 take over the country

00:52:21.760 and his son

00:52:22.240 was on the other side. 0.99

00:52:23.720 That's ridiculous. 0.87

00:52:25.120 So this whole thing 1.00

00:52:25.900 is so stupid 1.00

00:52:27.020 that you should 1.00

00:52:29.680 mock it

00:52:30.280 in a hilarious way,

00:52:32.280 much like RFK Jr.

00:52:33.780 mocked the coverage

00:52:34.640 of him going barefoot.

00:52:36.300 You cannot take 1.00

00:52:37.440 this shit seriously. 1.00

00:52:38.900 You have to make 1.00

00:52:39.540 them look like clowns 0.99

00:52:40.960 for pushing 0.99

00:52:42.220 the worst thing.

00:52:43.760 And the other thing is,

00:52:45.100 can you name

00:52:45.760 what Trump did

00:52:46.480 in the first term

00:52:47.880 that qualified

00:52:49.160 as the Hitler dictator?

00:52:50.400 What was it?

00:52:53.060 The only thing it was

00:52:54.380 was the thing

00:52:55.040 that the Democrats did,

00:52:57.400 which was try to turn

00:52:58.740 January 6th

00:52:59.580 into something

00:53:00.060 it obviously wasn't.

00:53:01.720 That's it.

00:53:02.980 And if they had not

00:53:04.100 rescued their narrative

00:53:06.180 on that last day,

00:53:08.260 just think about it.

00:53:09.260 They called him

00:53:09.800 Hitler for, what, 0.93

00:53:11.540 five and a half years straight?

00:53:13.860 And then he did

00:53:14.820 no Hitler things,

00:53:15.800 and their narrative

00:53:17.280 had gone to zero

00:53:18.360 because he's going

00:53:19.060 to walk out of office

00:53:20.080 not doing any

00:53:21.280 Hitler stuff.

00:53:23.300 But they got him.

00:53:24.900 On that last day,

00:53:26.080 they twisted the news

00:53:27.380 to turn it into

00:53:28.240 Hitler stuff 0.56

00:53:28.920 when clearly

00:53:30.140 it was the opposite.

00:53:31.240 But they controlled

00:53:31.900 the news enough

00:53:32.540 that they could

00:53:33.040 just grab out

00:53:36.000 that one

00:53:36.800 last Hail Mary.

00:53:39.900 But they did

00:53:40.580 make it work.

00:53:41.660 They did make it stick. 1.00

00:53:42.640 So mock that shit. 1.00

00:53:46.740 All right. 1.00

00:53:47.760 There's another

00:53:48.480 Soros prosecutor

00:53:49.720 who got defeated

00:53:51.700 narrowly in,

00:53:53.100 where was it,

00:53:54.160 Virginia.

00:53:55.560 And I told you

00:53:56.500 that my Soros-backed

00:53:58.700 prosecutor,

00:53:59.360 where I am,

00:54:00.140 Pamela Price,

00:54:01.480 there is a recall

00:54:02.480 petition that's going

00:54:03.440 around.

00:54:04.280 So there is some

00:54:05.020 pushback.

00:54:06.240 But let me ask you

00:54:07.280 this.

00:54:08.480 Have you ever seen

00:54:09.320 an interview

00:54:09.840 with Alex Soros

00:54:11.880 asking him to

00:54:13.580 explain the

00:54:14.580 thinking behind

00:54:15.340 the open borders

00:54:16.200 and the DAs?

00:54:19.960 I haven't.

00:54:23.420 So now that

00:54:25.140 Sam Bankman

00:54:27.520 freed is out

00:54:28.700 of the political

00:54:30.000 picture,

00:54:30.940 that would make

00:54:32.540 the Soros

00:54:33.260 the number one

00:54:34.340 donator to the

00:54:36.920 Democrats,

00:54:37.460 doesn't it?

00:54:37.880 So don't you

00:54:39.960 think that the

00:54:40.940 leader of the

00:54:42.380 number one

00:54:42.980 Democrat donor

00:54:44.400 and the person

00:54:45.660 who is most

00:54:46.380 responsible,

00:54:47.480 we think,

00:54:48.460 for the border

00:54:49.680 disaster and the

00:54:51.460 destruction of

00:54:52.180 American cities,

00:54:54.220 now just hold this

00:54:54.980 in your mind.

00:54:56.340 I've never seen

00:54:57.100 him interviewed.

00:54:59.260 Not with a 0.93

00:55:00.720 serious interview.

00:55:01.640 I think I've seen

00:55:02.360 him on a friendly

00:55:03.140 where they didn't

00:55:04.260 ask him anything

00:55:04.920 serious.

00:55:05.460 But have you

00:55:06.580 ever seen him

00:55:07.240 answer the

00:55:08.160 question,

00:55:09.240 how are these

00:55:09.800 liberal DAs and

00:55:10.980 the open borders,

00:55:12.440 how is that

00:55:12.900 working for

00:55:13.480 America?

00:55:14.240 And what is

00:55:14.660 even the

00:55:15.940 thinking behind

00:55:16.700 it?

00:55:17.240 Just defend it

00:55:18.120 as a political

00:55:19.960 strategy and

00:55:20.720 explain it.

00:55:22.300 That is the

00:55:23.020 biggest dog not

00:55:24.020 barking I've ever

00:55:24.860 seen in my

00:55:25.320 life.

00:55:26.340 Now I'd like to

00:55:27.280 think that the

00:55:28.840 right-leaning

00:55:29.680 media has been

00:55:31.580 trying very hard

00:55:32.420 to get him on

00:55:33.020 camera and

00:55:35.060 failing, right?

00:55:36.300 You can imagine

00:55:37.180 that he would

00:55:37.700 never take an

00:55:38.380 interview at

00:55:38.960 Fox News or

00:55:39.820 Breitbart.

00:55:41.220 Would that be

00:55:41.740 fair to say?

00:55:43.000 There's no way

00:55:43.760 he's ever going

00:55:44.280 to, but he

00:55:44.880 might do an

00:55:45.320 MSNBC hit because

00:55:47.440 it's just going

00:55:47.960 to be a

00:55:48.220 friendly.

00:55:49.820 So here's

00:55:52.080 what Trump

00:55:53.360 and Vivek

00:55:54.180 should demand.

00:55:57.260 I'm throwing

00:55:57.840 Vivek in there

00:55:58.600 because he's the

00:55:59.520 best communicator

00:56:00.340 in the race

00:56:00.800 and I'm

00:56:01.900 endorsing him.

00:56:04.240 They should

00:56:04.900 demand that

00:56:06.280 Alex Soros

00:56:07.160 sit for a

00:56:08.040 real interview.

00:56:10.040 In fact, it

00:56:10.920 could be even

00:56:11.960 with Vivek.

00:56:13.920 Wouldn't you

00:56:14.320 love to see

00:56:14.840 Vivek say,

00:56:15.540 look, Alex

00:56:16.600 Soros, you're 1.00

00:56:18.320 one of the

00:56:18.660 biggest players

00:56:19.320 in the country

00:56:19.940 and we have a

00:56:21.440 disagreement, but

00:56:22.300 we've had no

00:56:22.880 conversation about

00:56:23.800 it.

00:56:24.420 I invite you to

00:56:25.540 my podcast to

00:56:26.500 explain why

00:56:27.580 what you're doing

00:56:28.280 is good for the

00:56:29.340 country and

00:56:30.860 I would almost

00:56:32.500 ignore what

00:56:33.620 the other

00:56:34.320 Democrats said.

00:56:36.240 You know, if

00:56:36.620 you were Trump,

00:56:37.760 let's say you

00:56:38.180 got the

00:56:38.480 nomination or

00:56:39.500 Vivek, let's

00:56:40.200 say you get

00:56:40.580 the nomination.

00:56:42.260 I think you

00:56:43.160 could say

00:56:43.560 there's no

00:56:44.040 point in

00:56:44.720 debating

00:56:45.360 Biden because

00:56:47.280 he's dead,

00:56:48.840 but I'd like

00:56:49.740 to do a

00:56:50.300 debate with

00:56:50.900 Alex Soros.

00:56:53.440 Just imagine

00:56:54.280 that news hit.

00:56:55.980 I want to

00:56:56.680 do a debate,

00:56:57.440 but not with

00:56:57.900 Biden.

00:56:58.220 I want to

00:56:59.440 do it with

00:56:59.760 Alex Soros

00:57:00.560 because our

00:57:01.760 biggest problems

00:57:02.560 are directly

00:57:03.180 related to

00:57:03.880 Soros. 0.78

00:57:04.540 They're not

00:57:05.120 even directly

00:57:05.740 related to

00:57:06.380 Biden.

00:57:07.300 So I don't

00:57:07.700 want to talk

00:57:08.100 about the

00:57:08.380 person who's

00:57:08.820 not in

00:57:09.180 charge.

00:57:10.380 I want to

00:57:10.760 talk about

00:57:11.200 money is in

00:57:12.020 charge, right?

00:57:14.220 The money

00:57:14.900 person is always

00:57:15.500 in charge.

00:57:16.160 So I want to

00:57:16.740 talk to the

00:57:17.220 person in

00:57:17.660 charge.

00:57:18.120 I only want

00:57:18.800 to debate

00:57:19.240 Alex Soros.

00:57:21.200 Just imagine

00:57:22.080 the news

00:57:25.340 coverage of

00:57:25.920 that.

00:57:26.640 I only want

00:57:27.620 to talk to

00:57:28.140 him because

00:57:29.240 nobody else

00:57:29.740 matters in

00:57:30.220 this conversation.

00:57:33.160 And why

00:57:33.780 is that

00:57:34.080 missing?

00:57:35.480 Like, why

00:57:35.980 isn't that

00:57:36.600 happening?

00:57:37.940 I don't know.

00:57:39.320 It's like a

00:57:40.160 big mystery to

00:57:40.820 me.

00:57:41.400 The most

00:57:41.900 important

00:57:42.340 question from

00:57:43.720 the most

00:57:44.160 important player,

00:57:46.000 and nobody's

00:57:46.720 even asking

00:57:47.240 him.

00:57:48.880 Nobody's even

00:57:49.640 asking him the

00:57:50.320 question.

00:57:50.600 All right.

00:57:54.680 Israel

00:57:55.160 apparently is

00:57:56.940 making progress

00:57:58.040 at the

00:57:58.500 El Shifa 0.97

00:57:59.200 hospital in

00:58:00.560 Gaza.

00:58:01.520 We don't

00:58:01.880 know the

00:58:02.180 details and

00:58:02.840 never will

00:58:03.380 because it's

00:58:03.840 fog of war,

00:58:04.700 but they

00:58:05.600 seem to be

00:58:06.600 making inroads

00:58:07.800 in a very

00:58:08.540 large compound.

00:58:09.960 There are

00:58:10.140 lots of

00:58:10.500 civilians there.

00:58:12.240 It won't

00:58:13.040 be pretty.

00:58:14.420 It will not

00:58:14.940 be as

00:58:15.340 surgical as

00:58:16.420 you wish it

00:58:17.160 could be.

00:58:18.400 But I do

00:58:19.220 think that

00:58:19.660 they're doing

00:58:20.100 their very

00:58:20.600 best because

00:58:21.660 the entire

00:58:22.080 world is

00:58:22.540 watching.

00:58:23.940 And anything

00:58:24.640 less than

00:58:25.240 their very

00:58:25.640 best would

00:58:26.140 be,

00:58:26.600 frankly,

00:58:27.960 unacceptable.

00:58:29.240 But it

00:58:29.680 does look

00:58:30.080 like they're

00:58:30.420 doing it.

00:58:32.060 Now, I'll

00:58:32.400 tell you one

00:58:32.820 other thing

00:58:33.220 I'm feeling

00:58:34.260 watching the

00:58:36.680 Israeli response

00:58:37.920 to this.

00:58:39.280 Now, even

00:58:39.800 though you

00:58:40.520 can criticize

00:58:41.160 why they

00:58:42.140 got caught

00:58:43.320 off guard

00:58:43.860 and they

00:58:44.260 didn't see

00:58:44.620 the attack

00:58:45.040 coming earlier,

00:58:46.100 that's a

00:58:46.480 fair set of

00:58:47.600 questions.

00:58:48.980 But since

00:58:49.680 then,

00:58:50.100 I believe

00:58:52.000 what we've

00:58:53.440 observed is

00:58:54.900 some of the

00:58:55.360 highest level

00:58:56.200 of just

00:58:57.340 sheer

00:58:57.660 competence.

00:59:00.220 And it's

00:59:01.940 making me

00:59:02.340 feel good.

00:59:03.480 Now, not

00:59:03.920 about war,

00:59:05.100 not about

00:59:05.560 what's happening

00:59:06.120 in Gaza.

00:59:07.420 You can't

00:59:07.900 feel good

00:59:08.380 about that,

00:59:09.200 of course.

00:59:10.080 But I feel

00:59:10.940 good that I'm

00:59:11.900 seeing people

00:59:12.700 display high

00:59:14.240 level capability

00:59:15.380 and competence.

00:59:16.780 today we

00:59:18.120 learned, you

00:59:18.720 know, Joel

00:59:19.080 Pollack is

00:59:19.580 over there

00:59:19.900 reporting the

00:59:21.180 most dangerous

00:59:21.760 job in the

00:59:22.300 world.

00:59:22.720 I can't

00:59:23.260 believe he's

00:59:23.620 over there.

00:59:24.380 But he's

00:59:25.260 talking about

00:59:25.740 how the

00:59:26.220 harvests have

00:59:27.180 been left

00:59:28.060 because I

00:59:28.720 guess the

00:59:29.180 Gaza workers

00:59:31.580 couldn't be

00:59:32.320 there to

00:59:32.620 harvest it.

00:59:33.760 But the

00:59:34.680 citizens of

00:59:37.000 Israel have 0.96

00:59:37.680 actually

00:59:38.240 organized and

00:59:40.600 from all walks

00:59:41.580 of life are

00:59:42.240 showing up in

00:59:42.840 the fields and

00:59:44.360 they're harvesting.

00:59:46.960 So even the

00:59:47.520 harvest is

00:59:48.100 happening.

00:59:49.320 Can you

00:59:49.600 imagine that

00:59:50.220 happening in

00:59:50.780 America?

00:59:51.920 Could you

00:59:52.260 imagine America

00:59:53.100 being so well

00:59:54.120 organized that

00:59:55.700 we could get

00:59:56.320 citizens to

00:59:57.220 leave whatever

00:59:57.720 they were doing,

00:59:58.500 probably even

00:59:59.280 retirees and

01:00:00.280 students and

01:00:00.940 everything else,

01:00:01.740 and that they

01:00:02.220 would meet in

01:00:02.660 one place and

01:00:03.280 they would pick

01:00:03.780 the fruit because

01:00:05.760 they were all on

01:00:06.780 one team?

01:00:08.020 It's hard to

01:00:08.660 imagine in

01:00:09.160 America, but

01:00:09.800 we're not under

01:00:10.360 that kind of

01:00:10.880 threat that also

01:00:11.980 drives you together.

01:00:13.560 So I'm going to

01:00:14.260 say that simply

01:00:15.520 watching Israel

01:00:17.300 handle this

01:00:18.180 politically,

01:00:20.140 persuasion-wise,

01:00:22.120 strategically,

01:00:23.640 militarily,

01:00:24.940 is really

01:00:26.520 hardening.

01:00:28.120 Like I'm just

01:00:29.020 seeing high-level

01:00:29.680 capability in

01:00:31.400 all those areas,

01:00:33.080 and it just

01:00:33.460 feels good that

01:00:34.220 humans can do

01:00:35.540 high-level

01:00:35.960 stuff.

01:00:37.380 It just feels

01:00:37.860 good.

01:00:41.040 But we'll see

01:00:42.320 what's happening

01:00:42.960 over there in

01:00:43.540 those tunnels

01:00:44.000 pretty soon.

01:00:47.760 I saw Dave

01:00:48.680 Rubin

01:00:49.000 criticizing

01:00:49.800 Justin Trudeau

01:00:51.020 because

01:00:54.580 Justin Trudeau

01:00:56.400 is calling for

01:00:56.960 a ceasefire,

01:00:57.800 I guess,

01:00:58.580 which makes

01:00:59.200 him look to

01:00:59.820 many people

01:01:00.360 a little bit

01:01:01.100 too pro-Hamas. 0.57

01:01:04.300 And Dave

01:01:05.020 said this about

01:01:05.880 Justin Trudeau.

01:01:07.800 He said,

01:01:08.280 Justin Trudeau 0.99

01:01:08.860 is an evil 1.00

01:01:09.460 communist piece 1.00

01:01:10.400 of shit. 1.00

01:01:11.680 Also, he 1.00

01:01:12.440 should just

01:01:12.840 come out of

01:01:13.340 the closet

01:01:13.720 already.

01:01:16.540 Now, I'm

01:01:18.460 not going to

01:01:19.680 compare my

01:01:20.340 gaydar to

01:01:21.440 Dave Rubin's.

01:01:23.080 I will allow 0.84

01:01:24.640 that his gaydar 0.97

01:01:25.440 might be stronger 0.94

01:01:26.160 than mine.

01:01:28.000 So I don't

01:01:28.680 have an opinion.

01:01:30.140 I'll just say

01:01:30.880 he looks like 0.99

01:01:31.520 the gayest 0.99

01:01:32.000 person I've 0.99

01:01:32.520 ever seen

01:01:32.880 in my life.

01:01:34.360 That doesn't

01:01:35.000 mean he is,

01:01:35.540 and there's

01:01:35.760 nothing wrong

01:01:36.260 with it,

01:01:36.660 and it's not

01:01:37.040 a lot of

01:01:37.160 criticism.

01:01:38.440 But if he

01:01:39.680 is gay, 0.87

01:01:40.960 I feel like 0.76

01:01:41.880 he does have

01:01:42.440 a responsibility

01:01:43.180 to maybe be

01:01:44.780 a little bit

01:01:45.200 more forthcoming

01:01:46.080 about it.

01:01:47.100 So I'm not

01:01:47.900 saying he's

01:01:48.320 gay. 0.93

01:01:49.100 I don't have 0.93

01:01:49.520 any special

01:01:50.160 insight in that.

01:01:51.200 I'm not saying

01:01:51.860 that that would

01:01:52.360 be a problem.

01:01:53.700 In fact,

01:01:54.140 it'd be kind

01:01:54.520 of cool to 0.98

01:01:54.960 have a gay 0.96

01:01:56.640 leader just 0.99

01:01:59.060 so we can

01:01:59.520 get that over

01:02:00.100 with.

01:02:01.320 Just get it

01:02:01.980 over with.

01:02:03.440 Can we just

01:02:04.140 get past it?

01:02:05.160 So it'd be

01:02:05.520 great to have 0.99

01:02:05.980 a gay leader 0.98

01:02:06.520 sooner or 0.99

01:02:06.960 later.

01:02:07.980 I don't

01:02:08.500 care about

01:02:08.840 that part.

01:02:09.940 But if he's

01:02:10.560 in the closet,

01:02:11.980 as Dave Rubin

01:02:12.780 says, and it

01:02:14.540 certainly looks

01:02:15.180 that way to

01:02:15.600 me, why

01:02:16.980 not just

01:02:17.280 come out?

01:02:18.740 Everybody's

01:02:19.100 going to be

01:02:19.340 cool with it.

01:02:19.860 It's not

01:02:20.080 going to be

01:02:20.300 a problem.

01:02:22.180 If that's

01:02:22.820 the case.

01:02:23.240 We don't

01:02:23.500 know that's

01:02:23.940 the case.

01:02:24.700 Anyway,

01:02:25.820 here's my

01:02:27.420 take on

01:02:28.400 this.

01:02:28.700 I think

01:02:29.400 Trudeau is

01:02:30.140 foreshadowing

01:02:31.040 a massive

01:02:33.940 importation

01:02:34.920 of Hamas

01:02:36.480 supporters

01:02:36.920 into Canada

01:02:37.700 because I

01:02:39.380 don't think

01:02:39.840 you can

01:02:40.160 be that

01:02:40.740 friendly to

01:02:41.620 the Hamas

01:02:43.700 civilians and

01:02:45.460 then say we're

01:02:46.100 not going to

01:02:46.460 let you come

01:02:46.920 into the

01:02:47.240 country and

01:02:48.440 help you in

01:02:49.180 your dire

01:02:49.600 situation.

01:02:50.940 So he's

01:02:52.040 either painted

01:02:52.660 himself into

01:02:53.360 a corner where

01:02:54.220 they will have

01:02:54.820 to accept a

01:02:56.220 lot of

01:02:56.700 refugees,

01:02:58.220 or he would

01:02:59.540 look like a 1.00

01:02:59.980 hypocrite, 0.99

01:03:00.440 and that's 1.00

01:03:02.120 not ideal.

01:03:03.360 So I

01:03:03.740 believe he's

01:03:04.500 now created

01:03:05.020 a situation

01:03:05.680 where the

01:03:06.900 design of

01:03:07.920 the Canadian

01:03:08.420 government

01:03:08.960 guarantees that

01:03:10.180 they will

01:03:10.540 fall by

01:03:12.800 design.

01:03:14.120 Because if

01:03:14.940 their design

01:03:15.540 is to bring

01:03:16.140 in people

01:03:16.660 whose attitude

01:03:17.900 is anti-democracy,

01:03:21.080 anti-Canadian,

01:03:23.140 what do you

01:03:23.740 think happens?

01:03:25.060 What happens

01:03:25.920 always when

01:03:27.340 that group of

01:03:28.060 people, whoever

01:03:28.780 it is, from

01:03:29.540 anywhere, the

01:03:30.480 people who are

01:03:30.900 anti-government,

01:03:31.780 if that group

01:03:32.280 gets big enough,

01:03:33.780 well, it

01:03:35.160 doesn't have to

01:03:35.720 be 80%.

01:03:36.740 At around 10%,

01:03:38.580 it's too late.

01:03:40.460 Because Islam

01:03:41.820 has a really

01:03:42.420 good system that

01:03:44.320 allows it to

01:03:45.000 grow and

01:03:45.540 reproduce and

01:03:46.500 procreate and

01:03:47.320 gain power over

01:03:48.180 time, and it's

01:03:49.560 a pretty solid

01:03:51.020 system.

01:03:52.220 But if they

01:03:52.700 don't get 10%,

01:03:53.920 they can't do

01:03:54.880 that.

01:03:56.020 But it looks

01:03:56.600 like Trudeau

01:03:57.780 is on the

01:03:58.500 path of

01:04:00.180 being a safe

01:04:01.000 space for

01:04:02.560 all Palestinians,

01:04:04.380 which on

01:04:05.160 paper sounds

01:04:05.780 like the

01:04:06.420 greatest,

01:04:07.320 kindest

01:04:07.820 humanitarian

01:04:08.520 thing, but

01:04:09.900 in practice

01:04:10.420 might get

01:04:11.160 you a lot

01:04:11.540 of Hamas

01:04:11.920 supporters on

01:04:12.560 the border.

01:04:13.740 So, no

01:04:14.800 joking aside,

01:04:15.700 we need to

01:04:16.180 get serious

01:04:16.780 about building

01:04:17.400 a border

01:04:17.820 with Canada.

01:04:20.860 Vivek is

01:04:21.400 totally right

01:04:22.000 about this.

01:04:22.500 as shocking

01:04:24.780 as that

01:04:25.240 sounds,

01:04:26.640 Canada is

01:04:27.640 designed to

01:04:29.180 fail.

01:04:30.540 So I'm not

01:04:31.360 saying something

01:04:32.080 strange could

01:04:32.860 happen.

01:04:33.680 I'm saying

01:04:34.200 they're designed

01:04:35.100 to fail.

01:04:36.300 They've created

01:04:37.020 a structure,

01:04:38.400 the woke

01:04:39.620 structure,

01:04:41.040 that guarantees

01:04:42.040 the importation

01:04:43.180 of people who

01:04:43.920 will destroy

01:04:44.440 their system.

01:04:46.540 What would

01:04:47.340 stop it?

01:04:48.920 Name anything

01:04:49.620 you see happening

01:04:50.420 that would stop

01:04:51.060 this from

01:04:51.880 happening,

01:04:52.500 Canada

01:04:52.780 falling.

01:04:53.660 There's

01:04:54.100 nothing.

01:04:55.080 It's designed

01:04:56.000 to fall.

01:04:58.480 So let's

01:04:59.280 treat it

01:04:59.820 seriously.

01:05:03.640 I saw

01:05:04.500 a bunch

01:05:05.720 of video

01:05:06.160 of Palestinian

01:05:07.700 children talking

01:05:08.780 about the

01:05:09.140 education they're

01:05:09.860 getting from

01:05:10.340 the United

01:05:11.000 Nations.

01:05:12.400 So the

01:05:12.720 UNRWA,

01:05:14.940 UNRWA,

01:05:16.680 do they

01:05:17.200 pronounce it

01:05:17.700 UNRWA?

01:05:19.460 But apparently

01:05:20.040 I didn't

01:05:20.340 know this.

01:05:20.780 So the

01:05:21.020 United Nations

01:05:21.780 must have

01:05:23.240 been providing

01:05:23.840 schools for

01:05:24.660 the Palestinians

01:05:25.260 and the

01:05:28.420 children were

01:05:29.400 all saying

01:05:29.980 without prompting,

01:05:31.520 they all said

01:05:32.440 that they're

01:05:32.800 being taught 1.00

01:05:33.260 to kill the 1.00

01:05:33.820 Jews and 1.00

01:05:34.560 the children

01:05:35.300 say, I want 0.99

01:05:35.840 to stab 1.00

01:05:36.240 them again 1.00

01:05:36.700 and again.

01:05:37.460 I want to

01:05:38.200 become a 1.00

01:05:38.600 suicide bomber. 1.00

01:05:40.680 So you

01:05:41.280 think your

01:05:41.800 schools are

01:05:42.380 bad?

01:05:44.060 You think

01:05:44.800 that your

01:05:45.240 kid isn't

01:05:45.720 learning to

01:05:46.200 read and

01:05:46.620 that's bad?

01:05:47.240 Well, that

01:05:47.540 is bad.

01:05:48.560 But over

01:05:49.440 there, they're

01:05:49.900 learning to

01:05:50.320 be suicide 0.99

01:05:50.940 bombers.

01:05:53.120 So if

01:05:55.040 you want to

01:05:55.380 look at it

01:05:55.800 on a

01:05:56.060 relative basis,

01:05:57.520 your kid

01:05:58.100 learning not

01:05:58.740 to read is

01:05:59.780 way better

01:06:00.440 than their

01:06:01.140 kids learning

01:06:01.740 to blow 0.56

01:06:02.100 themselves up.

01:06:03.300 Way better.

01:06:04.400 So you got

01:06:04.860 that going

01:06:05.200 for you.

01:06:07.380 Why in the

01:06:08.160 world is

01:06:09.440 the UN

01:06:09.960 allowing that?

01:06:11.620 Is it because

01:06:12.280 the UN also

01:06:13.340 agrees with it?

01:06:14.780 Is it because

01:06:15.460 they don't

01:06:15.920 manage it

01:06:16.340 well?

01:06:16.540 Is it

01:06:17.880 because the

01:06:18.520 UN sets

01:06:19.340 up the

01:06:19.660 structure but

01:06:20.340 the teachers

01:06:21.020 are all

01:06:21.460 locals so

01:06:22.340 there's nothing

01:06:22.740 they can do?

01:06:24.040 What is it

01:06:24.560 about this

01:06:25.120 that we

01:06:25.860 can't stop

01:06:26.420 this where

01:06:26.920 somebody doesn't

01:06:27.540 stop it?

01:06:29.460 So, but

01:06:31.000 I'll tell you

01:06:31.380 what the UN

01:06:31.880 has done.

01:06:32.700 They've made

01:06:33.220 it easy for

01:06:34.300 Israel to 1.00

01:06:36.120 kill as many 1.00

01:06:36.760 children in 1.00

01:06:37.560 Palestine as

01:06:38.800 is required to

01:06:39.520 get the job

01:06:40.000 done.

01:06:40.920 Because, you

01:06:41.500 know, everybody's

01:06:42.020 playing the

01:06:42.540 don't kill our 0.99

01:06:43.180 babies, you 0.99

01:06:43.880 kill more 1.00

01:06:44.260 babies. 1.00

01:06:44.620 No, you 1.00

01:06:45.300 kill more 1.00

01:06:45.700 babies. 1.00

01:06:46.500 No, you 1.00

01:06:46.960 kill more 1.00

01:06:47.400 babies, but 1.00

01:06:48.500 you kill more 1.00

01:06:49.200 babies. 0.99

01:06:50.220 The whole war

01:06:51.020 became who

01:06:51.500 kills more 1.00

01:06:51.960 babies. 0.99

01:06:52.980 So whoever

01:06:53.540 could get an

01:06:54.180 excuse to 1.00

01:06:54.860 kill more 1.00

01:06:55.260 babies has an 1.00

01:06:56.500 advantage, and

01:06:57.560 the UN is

01:06:58.160 actually running

01:06:58.760 cover for

01:06:59.380 Israel.

01:07:00.400 They don't

01:07:00.720 mean to.

01:07:02.200 But if the

01:07:03.300 UN is going

01:07:03.840 to teach the

01:07:04.720 Palestinian children

01:07:05.900 to become 1.00

01:07:06.340 suicide bombers, 0.99

01:07:08.340 you tell me

01:07:09.100 how sad I

01:07:09.800 should be if

01:07:10.320 those kids get 1.00

01:07:10.980 killed. 0.99

01:07:11.320 there, I

01:07:13.900 said it

01:07:14.160 out loud.

01:07:16.160 You're not

01:07:16.760 supposed to

01:07:17.120 say that

01:07:17.460 out loud,

01:07:18.000 right?

01:07:19.140 But, you

01:07:19.620 know, I'm

01:07:19.920 cancelled, so.

01:07:21.920 Now, my

01:07:23.500 preference is

01:07:24.300 that no

01:07:24.900 babies are

01:07:25.420 killed anywhere.

01:07:27.220 You got that? 0.91

01:07:28.420 My preference

01:07:29.160 is there's no

01:07:30.660 war anywhere.

01:07:32.580 And the last

01:07:33.420 thing I'd want

01:07:33.960 is for any

01:07:34.500 children to be 0.97

01:07:35.120 killed because 1.00

01:07:35.700 they're the 1.00

01:07:36.260 ultimate

01:07:36.660 innocents.

01:07:38.580 But the

01:07:39.400 UN is making

01:07:40.100 it easy.

01:07:41.320 The UN is

01:07:42.020 providing

01:07:42.600 Israel with 0.90

01:07:45.620 all the

01:07:45.920 justification

01:07:46.480 anybody would

01:07:47.200 need.

01:07:48.580 Now, historically

01:07:49.920 children can

01:07:50.680 never be

01:07:51.120 combatants, but

01:07:52.540 they are

01:07:52.780 weaponized.

01:07:55.300 They have

01:07:55.840 been weaponized.

01:07:57.500 Yet, let me

01:07:57.980 tell you this.

01:07:58.860 Ethically, if

01:08:00.260 you saw a

01:08:00.780 10-year-old

01:08:01.300 child running

01:08:01.940 at you with 0.99

01:08:02.420 a suicide 1.00

01:08:02.880 vest, and

01:08:04.300 it was the

01:08:04.720 10th time

01:08:05.360 that month

01:08:05.880 a 10-year-old

01:08:07.100 with a suicide

01:08:07.700 vest came

01:08:08.380 running at

01:08:08.840 you, could

01:08:09.680 you blow 1.00

01:08:10.220 their head 0.99

01:08:10.580 off?

01:08:11.320 Of course.

01:08:13.120 Would it be

01:08:13.720 unethical or

01:08:14.500 immoral?

01:08:15.360 Nope.

01:08:16.520 Nope.

01:08:17.620 It would be

01:08:18.380 horrible beyond

01:08:19.680 belief, but

01:08:21.420 completely ethical

01:08:22.420 self-defense.

01:08:24.420 So, I don't

01:08:25.220 know where the

01:08:25.580 line is on

01:08:26.360 killing 0.99

01:08:27.740 innocents, but 0.94

01:08:28.860 the UN is

01:08:30.680 certainly moving

01:08:31.280 that line to

01:08:31.920 make it easier.

01:08:34.240 Which is not

01:08:35.260 good.

01:08:36.220 It's just, it

01:08:37.460 is.

01:08:39.320 All right.

01:08:41.300 There's some

01:08:41.960 talk, but I

01:08:43.080 don't think it's

01:08:43.620 confirmed, that

01:08:45.040 there's some

01:08:45.400 negotiations about

01:08:46.460 a three-day

01:08:47.100 truce that

01:08:48.060 may produce

01:08:48.940 50 hostages.

01:08:50.560 I don't

01:08:51.100 believe anything

01:08:51.640 about any of

01:08:52.260 that.

01:08:53.100 It's not

01:08:53.520 confirmed by

01:08:54.280 Israel.

01:08:57.320 If you're

01:08:58.040 Israel, would 0.98

01:08:58.640 you do a

01:08:59.180 three-day

01:08:59.760 stand-down

01:09:01.000 to get

01:09:02.840 50 hostages

01:09:05.660 back?

01:09:07.380 I think the

01:09:08.360 offer is

01:09:08.980 designed just

01:09:10.060 to make it

01:09:10.520 difficult for

01:09:11.680 Israel to

01:09:12.860 manage public

01:09:13.520 opinion.

01:09:16.020 I think that's

01:09:16.980 what it's

01:09:17.260 about.

01:09:18.200 So, Israel's 0.93

01:09:18.960 best play would

01:09:20.940 be to treat it

01:09:21.820 like there was

01:09:22.260 no offer at

01:09:22.980 all.

01:09:24.820 Now, might

01:09:25.380 that get 50 0.84

01:09:26.260 hostages killed

01:09:27.120 that wouldn't

01:09:27.560 get killed 0.81

01:09:28.280 otherwise?

01:09:29.320 There is no

01:09:30.360 way to know

01:09:30.980 that.

01:09:33.480 No way to

01:09:34.260 know it.

01:09:35.240 So, if you

01:09:35.840 don't know

01:09:36.340 it, sometimes

01:09:37.980 it makes sense

01:09:38.680 to see if

01:09:40.160 you can do

01:09:40.480 it.

01:09:41.120 But if

01:09:41.800 Hamas wants 1.00

01:09:43.060 you to stop

01:09:43.600 for three

01:09:44.040 days, it's

01:09:44.680 because they're

01:09:45.300 in bad

01:09:45.960 shape.

01:09:47.360 So, I feel

01:09:48.300 like I would

01:09:48.780 say no to

01:09:49.400 the offer.

01:09:50.500 Because, first

01:09:51.160 of all, you

01:09:51.480 don't know if

01:09:51.860 it's real.

01:09:52.880 You don't

01:09:53.440 know if 50

01:09:54.080 of them are

01:09:54.600 even alive.

01:09:55.500 You don't

01:09:55.820 have any

01:09:56.220 proof of

01:09:56.720 life.

01:09:58.200 I wouldn't

01:09:58.860 take the

01:09:59.200 deal.

01:09:59.460 would you?

01:10:02.840 I would

01:10:03.460 counter with

01:10:04.280 if you

01:10:07.000 give all

01:10:07.540 of them

01:10:07.780 to us,

01:10:09.100 we will

01:10:09.760 consider

01:10:10.200 talking.

01:10:11.840 But probably

01:10:12.960 I would just 1.00

01:10:13.480 destroy them 1.00

01:10:14.000 after they 0.99

01:10:14.400 give.

01:10:14.960 I mean,

01:10:15.640 Hamas knows 0.99

01:10:16.360 that, I

01:10:16.940 think, if

01:10:18.140 they give

01:10:18.460 all the

01:10:18.760 hostages

01:10:19.200 back,

01:10:20.640 they're going

01:10:21.680 to be fully

01:10:22.120 destroyed.

01:10:22.580 but they

01:10:23.900 also know

01:10:24.340 if they

01:10:24.640 don't give

01:10:25.260 the hostages

01:10:25.920 back,

01:10:27.380 they'll be

01:10:27.760 fully

01:10:28.020 destroyed.

01:10:29.660 I think,

01:10:30.500 I think

01:10:30.860 they know

01:10:31.160 that.

01:10:31.980 So, all

01:10:32.740 they could

01:10:33.020 be getting

01:10:33.380 would be

01:10:33.840 some kind

01:10:34.280 of a,

01:10:34.660 you know,

01:10:35.880 some kind

01:10:36.220 of a

01:10:36.440 reprieve

01:10:36.860 for three

01:10:37.220 days,

01:10:37.800 and I

01:10:38.660 don't know,

01:10:38.820 it's probably

01:10:39.120 just to get

01:10:39.900 the leaders

01:10:40.340 out of the

01:10:40.740 tunnels.

01:10:42.020 So, I

01:10:42.820 would say no

01:10:43.260 to that if

01:10:43.660 I were

01:10:43.880 Israel.

01:10:44.280 We'll see

01:10:44.580 what happens.

01:10:45.520 And that,

01:10:46.000 ladies and 0.98

01:10:46.280 gentlemen,

01:10:46.640 is the

01:10:47.040 finest

01:10:47.320 live stream

01:10:48.040 you've

01:10:49.740 ever seen.

01:10:50.120 I'm going

01:10:51.640 to say

01:10:51.840 thank you

01:10:52.440 to the

01:10:53.000 YouTube

01:10:53.600 people.

01:10:57.400 I hear

01:10:58.120 that

01:10:58.520 Michigan

01:10:59.240 judge

01:10:59.680 just ruled

01:11:00.260 that Trump

01:11:00.660 is allowed

01:11:01.180 to be

01:11:01.500 on the

01:11:01.780 ballot.

01:11:02.640 Yeah,

01:11:02.880 the effort

01:11:03.680 to keep

01:11:04.240 Trump off

01:11:05.020 the ballot,

01:11:05.620 apparently

01:11:05.900 they're

01:11:06.200 failing.

01:11:10.580 And

01:11:11.100 all right,

01:11:15.840 apparently

01:11:16.380 they're

01:11:16.580 failing.

01:11:17.200 And that's

01:11:17.580 all for

01:11:17.880 today.

01:11:18.820 I will

01:11:19.180 talk to

01:11:19.640 you

01:11:19.940 later.

01:11:22.160 See you

01:11:22.540 YouTube.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - November 15, 2023

Episode 2293 Scott Adams： CWSA 11⧸15⧸23

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript