Real Coffee with Scott Adams - November 15, 2023


Episode 2293 Scott Adams: CWSA 11⧸15⧸23


Episode Stats

Length

1 hour and 11 minutes

Words per Minute

144.17204

Word Count

10,291

Sentence Count

755

Misogynist Sentences

14

Hate Speech Sentences

32


Summary

A member of Congress accused of being punched in the kidneys while on live TV, and a video of something shooting sideways across the sky that could only be a UFO, probably aliens from another dimension, or it could be 6,523 fake videos of UFOs.


Transcript

00:00:00.000 Do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do do good morning everybody and welcome
00:00:10.920 to the highlight of human civilization and if you'd like to take your experience up to levels
00:00:17.740 you know where I'm going with this don't you levels that no one's ever seen before can't
00:00:22.460 even be expressed in human words well all you need for that is a cup or a mug or a glass
00:00:27.080 a tankard cell, a chalice of stein, a canteen jugger, a flask, a vessel of any kind.
00:00:32.800 Fill it with your favorite liquid.
00:00:34.140 I like coffee.
00:00:35.560 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine at the end of the day.
00:00:39.740 The thing that makes everything better.
00:00:41.020 It's called the Simultaneous Sip.
00:00:43.560 It happens now.
00:00:44.380 Go.
00:00:48.800 Oh, that's so good.
00:00:51.260 That's some good sipping right there.
00:00:52.980 By the way, a lot of people ask me for my pronouns.
00:00:58.700 I prefer disgraced.
00:01:02.060 So if you're thinking about that, disgraced.
00:01:05.040 So a video of something shooting sideways across the sky that could only be a UFO, probably
00:01:11.720 aliens from another dimension.
00:01:14.340 Or it could be number 6,523 fake videos of UFOs.
00:01:21.480 It's one of those two things.
00:01:23.900 It's either 6,423 fake videos in a row, and it's another one, or possibly beings from
00:01:31.600 another dimension.
00:01:33.460 So put your money down.
00:01:37.920 This is the funnest day of news.
00:01:40.840 It's going to sound like I'm making this up.
00:01:42.680 That Representative Tim Burchett accused Kevin McCarthy of giving him a sucker punch in the kidneys, as
00:01:54.700 Burchett was doing a live interview to the news, and apparently, I think Burchett had voted to vote out Kevin
00:02:03.320 McCarthy, and allegedly, and allegedly, I mean, I wasn't there, but allegedly McCarthy elbowed him in the kidneys so hard while he was on live TV that it caused Burchett to actually, you know, try to chase him down the hallway to fight, and then McCarthy acted like nothing happened, or it was no big deal, or he's blowing it out of proportion or something.
00:02:26.940 And I'm thinking to myself, and I'm thinking to myself, that happened?
00:02:30.180 Did that happen? That's a real thing that happened?
00:02:33.440 That a member of Congress was assaulted while giving an interview by the ex-Speaker of the House?
00:02:40.880 Did that actually happen in the real world?
00:02:43.780 Well, that's the most outrageous and crazy thing I've ever heard of, and there's no way that two things like that could have happened yesterday.
00:02:52.380 I'll tell you, that's one of those things that happens once in a million years.
00:02:58.680 Well, did you see the congressional hearing in which Senator Mullen challenged the Teamster president to a physical fight?
00:03:08.860 Because of something the Teamster representative had said previously.
00:03:15.460 So they decided they were going to stand up and go fight, but it was stopped by Bernie.
00:03:22.220 So Bernie Sanders, I guess, was in charge, and he banged his little gavel, and he stopped it.
00:03:29.360 Now, have you ever seen men pretend they want to fight, but really, really, they want you to break it up?
00:03:37.020 You've seen that, right?
00:03:38.040 Oh, I'm so going to fight.
00:03:39.720 I'm so going to fight, unless, you know, unless somebody holds me back.
00:03:44.040 Anybody? Anybody?
00:03:45.140 Oh, oh, I want to heal.
00:03:46.940 Oh, I'm going to, let's go outside.
00:03:48.980 Let's go outside right now.
00:03:50.440 Don't hold me back.
00:03:51.640 Oh, oh, oh, I'm being held back.
00:03:54.680 Oh, great, great.
00:03:56.100 I so want to go outside, but now I'm being held back.
00:04:00.120 I can't tell you how much I want to be in a physical fight right now.
00:04:03.560 If only I could, I'm not being held back.
00:04:06.280 So here's what actually happened, and I'm going to tell this literally, but I'll use funny words to describe it, but it's accurate.
00:04:17.180 Senator Mullen really wanted to fight, but he was prevented by an octogenarian with a tiny hammer.
00:04:28.640 Oh, oh, I wanted to fight so badly, but I had this octogenarian with a tiny hammer, and he hit that, the gavel down, and I'm like, oh, no, tiny hammer.
00:04:41.540 That's going to stop me.
00:04:42.580 So I really wanted to fight until the octogenarian with a tiny hammer weighed in, and then what could I do?
00:04:50.000 What could I do?
00:04:50.600 I had to back down.
00:04:53.420 Yeah.
00:04:54.040 Those are two stories that happened in the real world that you live in.
00:05:01.300 Now, you might say to yourself, is this a sign that everything is falling apart and society is crumbling?
00:05:06.480 No, no, it's a sign that the news has finally turned funny, like it always meant to be.
00:05:15.060 We don't need all this war and killing, and we need more like this.
00:05:20.180 I would like to see our representatives duke it out, or at least pretend they're going to duke it out and be held back by 80-year-old guys with tiny hammers.
00:05:31.000 That'll work, too.
00:05:31.900 It's just as funny, either way.
00:05:33.940 But I, for one, welcome this new competitive approach.
00:05:39.160 So, what else is happening?
00:05:41.000 I guess TMZ had a big scoop where it showed RFK Jr. walking barefoot on a plane going to the bathroom and back.
00:05:49.660 And people said, my God, a future president walking barefoot on a plane?
00:05:54.880 We cannot have this.
00:05:56.680 This is so bad.
00:05:57.760 Who would do this?
00:05:58.540 Whoever walks barefoot in a plane.
00:06:01.360 And RFK Jr. cleverly used it to get attention.
00:06:05.720 So he did a funny video where he's sitting in the airport with a full suit on.
00:06:12.040 And he says he'd never do that again.
00:06:14.080 And then they pan back, and he's barefoot in his suit.
00:06:18.000 Very good.
00:06:19.500 Very nicely done.
00:06:20.740 It's very hard.
00:06:22.200 It's really tough for a politician to do an intentional humor skit and have it work.
00:06:29.140 Now, what he did was he kept it simple, right?
00:06:32.720 Keeping it simple was what made this work.
00:06:35.080 So the joke was just they panned out and he was barefoot.
00:06:38.400 So all he had to do was deliver like a straight line.
00:06:41.280 Oh, I'd never do that again.
00:06:42.460 And then it worked.
00:06:44.240 Totally good execution.
00:06:46.780 And then he put out a little meme that said, no shirt, no shoes, no secret service protection.
00:06:53.760 No shirt, no shoes, no secret service protection.
00:07:01.260 Well, I mean, it's funny unless somebody attacks him.
00:07:03.520 So, RFK Jr. for the win.
00:07:10.740 There's a little drama over at the Daily Wire.
00:07:14.560 Candace Owens has her views on the Hamas-Israel situation, which are a little bit at odds with Ben Shapiro.
00:07:22.180 And I guess Ben Shapiro didn't mind saying that in a public gathering of Daily Wire people and somebody caught it on camera.
00:07:29.700 So it makes me wonder, how long does Candace Owens last at the Daily Wire under this specific situation that Ben Shapiro thinks she's spreading bad information about Israel?
00:07:45.040 Can you survive that?
00:07:46.480 I would love it if she did, right?
00:07:52.540 Because I would rather see the conversation be brought up to another level.
00:07:59.040 I mean, wouldn't you love to see Ben Shapiro and Candace Owens have a little podcast together now?
00:08:05.920 I would.
00:08:07.600 And I'll tell you what would be the outcome of that.
00:08:11.240 Ben Shapiro would probably provide some historical context that Candace needed.
00:08:17.360 Candace would probably say, thank you for filling in those gaps.
00:08:23.100 And then they would be two smart, capable people who went on with their lives.
00:08:27.980 It could turn out really well.
00:08:30.000 So I think there's a play here where Ben Shapiro and Candace Owens make us all smarter.
00:08:38.460 Right?
00:08:38.880 I mean, nobody gets all the facts right.
00:08:42.120 You know, maybe Ben Shapiro does.
00:08:43.680 He is kind of an outlier.
00:08:46.900 So maybe he does.
00:08:47.760 Maybe he gets all the facts right.
00:08:49.200 But the rest of us don't.
00:08:51.080 So there's nothing wrong with a Ben Shapiro straightening you out once in a while, whoever you are.
00:08:56.900 You know, we all need a Ben Shapiro sometimes just to tell us what we missed.
00:09:02.140 Make it positive.
00:09:02.900 I like the drama.
00:09:05.620 I like the fact that Ben Shapiro said, was willing to say directly to the staff what he thought.
00:09:11.200 I like that Candace Owens is Candace Owens.
00:09:14.840 Talk it out.
00:09:16.180 Could be good.
00:09:16.700 In the what could be more ridiculous category, you know the tragic story of a hockey player, Adam Johnson, who was, how should I say it?
00:09:31.160 Another player lifted his skate and seemed to thrust it into Adam Johnson's neck, which killed him.
00:09:39.900 He actually died on the ice, tragically.
00:09:42.740 And today the story is that the player who did that is going to be arrested and charged with murder.
00:09:54.720 So now a part of the story that's important, just because it's 2023 and this is the way we talk about everything,
00:10:01.700 is that the person who died was white and the person who is arrested for murder is black.
00:10:08.720 Now, as you know, that would be sort of not playing into the most popular narrative of all news organizations,
00:10:18.060 that they like the George Floyd situation where you take a thing that happened one time to one person in the most totally unique situation
00:10:29.200 and you try to make that seem like it's, you know, a representative of the whole.
00:10:35.160 Oh, George Floyd represents all violence against black people, which of course it did not.
00:10:41.620 It was exactly one situation of which I've never heard of one like it.
00:10:46.460 It's not exactly like anything I've ever heard of.
00:10:48.480 But we like to generalize it if somebody's got a narrative that says,
00:10:53.600 oh, let's generalize this, you know, once in a million anecdote and try to make something out of it.
00:10:59.860 But when the reverse is true and it would look like a black man killing a white man,
00:11:06.600 again, let me stress, it's as anecdotal as the George Floyd thing is.
00:11:12.940 There has never been another situation of a black hockey player killing a white hockey player.
00:11:20.080 There probably will never be another one.
00:11:22.920 So to imagine that it represents anything, it doesn't.
00:11:27.600 It literally represents two people in a tragic situation.
00:11:32.020 But how differently they are treated.
00:11:34.700 One gets a statue and it becomes the biggest story for years.
00:11:38.600 And the other one, you won't even believe this.
00:11:41.380 One news entity, instead of showing the perpetrator's face or even mentioning the name,
00:11:48.880 they're actually not mentioning the name of the famous hockey player who was arrested.
00:11:55.880 Not even saying his name.
00:11:58.100 They're not showing his picture because that would be a bad narrative.
00:12:02.520 But worse, one entity, one of the news entities,
00:12:06.640 showed a stock photo of a white person being arrested and handcuffed.
00:12:11.380 I mean, just hold that in your mind for a moment.
00:12:16.880 They tried so hard to avoid anything that could be turned into a negative narrative,
00:12:22.420 which, by the way, I agree with.
00:12:24.200 I do not think they should allow that to be turned into some statement about black and white people,
00:12:29.240 because it's not.
00:12:30.640 No more than the George Floyd was.
00:12:32.600 It's about one person.
00:12:35.180 You know, we are infinitely unique.
00:12:37.000 It doesn't mean anything if one of us does something.
00:12:40.760 So, but the wild level that they would go to,
00:12:46.220 to not show a picture of the perpetrator who is a professional hockey player.
00:12:51.620 It's not like some private citizen and nobody heard about this thing.
00:12:54.920 So, you know, you want to give him some privacy?
00:12:56.940 It was in all the news until he got arrested and then they scrub it out.
00:13:01.620 So, the ridiculousness level is off the chart there.
00:13:08.000 Well, singer Billie Eilish, she was in the news because she was bemoaning.
00:13:15.920 That's what you say when you don't like what somebody said.
00:13:19.200 They're bemoaning.
00:13:20.680 Isn't that kind of insulting to say somebody's bemoaning something?
00:13:24.400 It's like, oh, I'm moaning.
00:13:26.100 Why can't they just have an opinion and they're saying it?
00:13:30.660 Are you really bemoaning?
00:13:32.880 Are you really complaining?
00:13:34.880 Or are you just describing a situation?
00:13:36.720 So, I'm going to defend Billie Eilish
00:13:38.980 because I don't think that's the right way to characterize it.
00:13:42.720 It was just an opinion.
00:13:44.340 But what she says is that being a woman in the public light is a perpetual war.
00:13:50.220 And she claims that men do not get similarly scrutinized for their body.
00:13:56.100 Is that right?
00:13:59.740 Men do not get similarly scrutinized for their bodies.
00:14:05.340 Oh, let's ask Chris Christie.
00:14:08.360 Hey, Chris Christie, has anybody ever said anything that seemed a little negative at all about your body type?
00:14:16.480 I think so.
00:14:18.200 Has anybody ever said anything negative about my physicality?
00:14:22.600 Are you fucking kidding me?
00:14:26.100 How about every day?
00:14:28.800 Literally every day.
00:14:30.820 Yeah.
00:14:31.820 Everything.
00:14:32.620 You know, height, your hairline, you know, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
00:14:36.620 You name it.
00:14:37.180 How often do you, let's see, let's check the headlines.
00:14:46.300 Let's see, there's a headline about Will Smith where he's accused of having a small penis.
00:14:53.020 That's actually in the news today.
00:14:56.900 That's actually in the news.
00:14:58.100 Now, by the way, I'm not saying it's true because the source is very undependable.
00:15:02.160 We'll get to a completely undependable source.
00:15:05.720 But that's in the news.
00:15:07.860 So if I check the news, I see Chris Christie being called overweight.
00:15:11.540 I see Will Smith being humiliated about something that's probably not true in the first place.
00:15:16.660 And it seems universal.
00:15:21.360 Do you know why Billie Eilish doesn't know that men are continually scrutinized for their appearance?
00:15:29.160 Because nobody gives a shit about men.
00:15:31.980 Am I right?
00:15:33.460 You don't even notice.
00:15:34.760 Insulting men is such a baseline activity that it doesn't even catch your attention.
00:15:43.420 But at least women, when you insult them for their physicality, at least they make some news.
00:15:49.980 It makes some news.
00:15:51.560 For men, it's just business as usual.
00:15:53.660 You have no idea.
00:15:55.300 Let me say this to you, Billie Eilish.
00:15:57.060 And by the way, I'm defending you for, I think this news report is a little rough.
00:16:01.300 But, and this is not an insult.
00:16:05.420 This is almost a universal statement.
00:16:08.680 Wouldn't you agree that men have no idea what it's like to be a woman?
00:16:13.060 Everybody agree with that?
00:16:14.640 Men, you know you have no idea, right?
00:16:17.300 Not even the slightest idea what it's like to experience life as a woman.
00:16:23.140 But do women have any idea what it's like to experience life as a man?
00:16:27.820 It's the same.
00:16:29.540 It's like, you know, can a white guy know what it's like to experience life as a black guy?
00:16:35.240 No.
00:16:36.500 No, there is no way you can do that.
00:16:38.660 And vice versa.
00:16:41.380 So, Billie Eilish, I think you have a blind spot about men.
00:16:49.500 But I appreciate your opinion anyway.
00:16:51.200 If you haven't seen it, I've got a pinned tweet on my top 10 holiday gifts.
00:16:57.680 I have this idea that the best gift recommendation is stuff that you've owned for a long time and you don't have any economic interest in.
00:17:07.740 Isn't that the best recommendation?
00:17:11.100 Because I hate a recommendation where there's a new product and then somebody opens it up and talks about it.
00:17:17.200 Because new, you really don't know anything about it.
00:17:20.180 I mean, you've got to use it for a year before you know if you hate it or love it.
00:17:25.080 So I gave you 10 recommendations of things, two of them are my books.
00:17:28.980 But the other eight are just things I own and have owned for a long time.
00:17:33.060 Such as my coffee warmer and a thing that I use to fill up my tires.
00:17:38.520 And a bunch of stuff you might be interested in that just makes good gift stuff.
00:17:43.180 And people ask me what kind of electronic drum set I use.
00:17:46.460 And people ask me what kind of equipment I use for podcasting.
00:17:50.300 So both of those are there as gift ideas.
00:17:53.320 You might know somebody who wants to be a podcaster.
00:17:55.800 Might be a teen who wants to just get into it or something.
00:17:59.080 And you can buy them a little.
00:18:00.340 I show you what to get for the minimum setup.
00:18:04.180 So you might like that.
00:18:05.740 All right, here's a question for you.
00:18:07.400 How many Americans say the economy is not on the wrong track?
00:18:14.520 Let's see how smart you are.
00:18:16.460 You could probably get this within, I don't know, a few percentage points.
00:18:20.160 But according to Fannie Mae, what percentage of Americans don't think we're on the wrong track?
00:18:27.020 Very good guess.
00:18:28.000 Very good guess.
00:18:28.860 It's 78 said we're on the wrong track.
00:18:32.620 So 100 minus 78 is 22.
00:18:37.880 22, exactly.
00:18:39.060 Yeah, nearly a quarter of people.
00:18:41.660 It's amazing that you could guess that.
00:18:44.640 Like, are you all geniuses or something?
00:18:47.580 How do you always know the answers before I even ask you the question?
00:18:50.600 It's shocking how smart you are.
00:18:53.660 If you're new to this live stream, I hope you're impressed about the other people watching.
00:19:00.400 Look how often they got that answer right.
00:19:02.900 Pretty good.
00:19:03.600 Pretty good.
00:19:06.400 Well, once again, more confirmation that, you know, the economists for, I don't know,
00:19:14.460 over a year or so were saying there's going to be this big old recession and a hard landing.
00:19:19.800 And that's what the experts pretty much, by consensus, were saying there's going to be some recession-y thing.
00:19:27.820 And that, and you wouldn't see inflation dropping down fast enough to save it.
00:19:34.420 But now the current opinion is that we're expecting a soft landing and inflation is way too slowly, but is coming down.
00:19:43.980 And the stock market responded to that.
00:19:46.820 Now, this is a case again of Scott beats the experts.
00:19:52.140 Can you remember anyone except me predicting that we would have a soft landing or, you know, we'd do fine?
00:19:59.360 Did you hear any other person making that prediction a year and a half ago?
00:20:05.800 I'm the only one.
00:20:07.040 I don't think I heard even one person say that we'd probably make it through fine.
00:20:13.520 Best prediction of the year?
00:20:14.680 So I do have the best economic prediction of the year.
00:20:17.860 If you can find somebody else who said the same thing, then I'll give them credit.
00:20:21.680 But I don't know anybody else who said the same thing.
00:20:24.600 So put that on my permanent list of what I get right and what I got wrong.
00:20:29.880 I'll remind you I don't get everything right.
00:20:32.820 But there are some categories that I get right more than often, more right than often.
00:20:37.700 The things I get wrong are things that are purely political because that's not my domain.
00:20:45.440 So, for example, when somebody picks a vice president, I'm terrible at guessing that because that's just purely political, right?
00:20:53.920 There's too many things behind the scenes that you don't know about.
00:20:56.640 You can't really predict that.
00:20:58.120 But I'm pretty good at telling you when a mass hysteria is a mass hysteria because that's one of my domains.
00:21:04.380 I'm pretty good with economics and business because that's my education and background.
00:21:11.620 And if you see me get out of my domains, you should immediately lower your impression of my predictions.
00:21:19.820 So when I talk about UFOs being fake, that's my domain.
00:21:25.660 That's well within my level of good guessing.
00:21:29.760 So I'm probably right about that, that the UFOs are fake.
00:21:34.380 But, all right, what else is going on?
00:21:38.140 So Nikki Haley trying very hard to completely destroy any chance she would have to be president.
00:21:46.560 She's saying of Vivek, you know, Nikki Haley and Vivek are going back and forth.
00:21:51.220 And she said on a podcast that Vivek might have a girl problem.
00:21:55.180 In other words, his problem criticizing Nikki Haley is because he's a sexist.
00:22:01.180 Who says that?
00:22:06.000 That's Hillary Clinton.
00:22:08.520 Do you know who doesn't say bullshit like this?
00:22:12.780 A Republican.
00:22:14.940 How do you run as a Republican by acting like a Democrat as hard as you can?
00:22:20.400 Now, is that my only example in which she's acting like a Democrat?
00:22:23.440 No.
00:22:23.940 No.
00:22:25.580 She seems quite willing to fund the forever wars.
00:22:30.040 Now, that's, unfortunately, you know, sort of the military-industrial complex.
00:22:34.720 So that's neither Democrat nor Republican.
00:22:37.260 But you know what it's not?
00:22:39.300 It's not purely Republican.
00:22:40.580 So her military opinions fit both Democrat or Republican.
00:22:48.060 You know, there's a big majority of both.
00:22:50.780 And now she's got this girl power comment that is pure Hillary Clinton.
00:22:55.840 And that's the opposite of Republican, honestly.
00:22:58.700 It's just the opposite of Republican.
00:22:59.980 And then, now she's got this idea that every person on social media should be verified by their name.
00:23:08.760 And all the platforms should show their algorithms.
00:23:12.960 Here's what Elon Musk said to a news report that Nikki Haley wanted everybody to be verified by their name.
00:23:21.800 So giving up privacy on social media.
00:23:24.840 Musk posts, super messed up.
00:23:27.660 She can stop pretending to run for president now.
00:23:32.100 I think, god damn it, he's just so good at using his own platform.
00:23:39.540 It's kind of crazy that he's good at this.
00:23:43.240 He's good at too many things.
00:23:44.860 It's kind of bothering me.
00:23:46.360 Musk is.
00:23:47.220 He's just so good at a lot of things.
00:23:49.400 But the fact that he'd be good at building businesses, but also good at the small communication chunks.
00:23:56.480 You shouldn't be so good at so many things.
00:23:59.340 That's a lot of things to be good at.
00:24:01.500 Anyway, I think he summed it up.
00:24:04.560 There's no way you could take her seriously as a Republican candidate.
00:24:07.920 Would you agree with that?
00:24:09.700 Even if there's something you liked about her, would you agree that she's out of the race now?
00:24:15.300 As soon as you go sexist, remember I called this out early.
00:24:18.440 I called her out as a sexist early.
00:24:22.060 It was obvious from the beginning.
00:24:24.260 There's no way you're going to put a misandri-ist, someone who's got a feeling about men.
00:24:35.400 There's no way you're going to elect that as a Republican.
00:24:38.160 It's literally as close to the opposite of being a Republican as you could possibly get.
00:24:42.560 So what's the Republican part?
00:24:46.080 She wants more government restrictions on social media.
00:24:53.360 And she wants to spend her money on wars.
00:24:58.060 And she wants to complain about woke bullshit.
00:25:03.360 She's not even close to being a Republican.
00:25:05.520 It's crazy.
00:25:06.580 How could she even be in the conversation?
00:25:09.340 I don't understand it.
00:25:10.280 Well, I do understand it.
00:25:12.740 You know, women are always going to support women.
00:25:16.040 And, you know, I get that.
00:25:18.020 Everybody wants somebody that's on their team to do well.
00:25:23.100 All right.
00:25:23.780 Here's a, you know, the big money companies are reported to be buying up single-family starter homes all over the country.
00:25:33.780 And I didn't know how big this trend is, but apparently it's beyond enormous.
00:25:38.440 Now, what do you make of the fact that the big hedge funds and the big money people are buying up massive amounts of private homes?
00:25:49.360 Now, the starter type that you can rent.
00:25:52.340 Now, what do you make of that?
00:25:53.660 Why would they do that now when home prices are so high?
00:26:00.780 Why would the smartest money people buy the assets that are wildly overpriced, it looks like?
00:26:09.000 Because real estate's really high compared to ability to buy.
00:26:12.260 All right.
00:26:13.920 I'm going to give you a financial look at this that you haven't heard before.
00:26:21.640 And it's also going to tell you what to do in your own financial situation.
00:26:27.600 All right.
00:26:28.220 Number one, real estate is a good inflation hedge.
00:26:32.600 Would you agree?
00:26:33.260 Because the price of a physical asset will move with inflation, as long as people still want it.
00:26:40.500 And people will always want housing.
00:26:43.360 So if you put it in anything else, it could be risky.
00:26:48.020 But homes, you know there's going to be a shortage of them.
00:26:51.340 And you know that people will rent them.
00:26:54.260 It does look like a safe place to part money.
00:26:56.900 But do you think they're doing it just because it's safe and just because it's a potential inflation hedge?
00:27:04.000 That's not enough.
00:27:05.920 It's not enough.
00:27:07.680 Here's another reason to do it.
00:27:09.220 So this will be a little lesson on business models and how business people see stuff.
00:27:13.700 In my opinion, one of the biggest problems in America is all the red tape and regulations about getting anything done in business.
00:27:21.400 You've heard Elon Musk talk about, you know, the size.
00:27:24.660 If you put all the regulations he has to satisfy from every country, if you put them in a pile, it would be, you know, the size of the ceiling.
00:27:33.800 Now, imagine that in the world of building and construction.
00:27:38.940 You know, the 50 states and their different recommendations and they just get tighter and tighter and it's harder and harder to build.
00:27:44.820 I built my own home in my town and by far the hardest part was getting it approved.
00:27:53.180 And why was it a problem to get it approved?
00:27:55.260 Was I building some kind of strange, crazy, dangerous house?
00:27:59.060 No.
00:28:00.200 It wasn't really any reason.
00:28:01.580 It's just that the process, the paperwork is just so unbearable, you can barely get it done.
00:28:07.860 So, the other thing that's brilliant about this is knowing that paperwork and complexity is increasing, so it's really, really going to be hard for somebody to build new homes.
00:28:21.880 So, they're predicting, I think it's a prediction, that the government will be so incompetent that it won't allow enough home building to satisfy demand.
00:28:33.360 Is that a smart bet by the smartest money people in the world?
00:28:37.400 That the government will remain incompetent and maybe even get worse and therefore the supply of homes can never keep up with the demand?
00:28:45.540 That's a good bet.
00:28:47.580 That is a good bet right there.
00:28:50.720 So, you've got the inflation hedge and you've got the fact that the supply and demand are kind of perfect because it's hard to imagine a situation where the government suddenly approves.
00:29:03.960 Improves to the point where they're like, oh, these are all unnecessary regulations.
00:29:07.840 You know, let us spur development by getting rid of these.
00:29:10.960 It's just not going to happen.
00:29:12.960 But, there is a stronger reason for buying single person homes and I've never heard anybody say it and in my opinion, it's the strongest reason.
00:29:26.060 And here it comes.
00:29:29.020 Robots can't own property.
00:29:30.720 That's everything you need to know about the future of investing.
00:29:36.900 Robots can't own property.
00:29:39.760 But you know what they can do?
00:29:41.540 They can take your hourly wage job and will.
00:29:46.460 So, if you're working for a salary and your main economic engine is working for a paycheck, you're in serious trouble.
00:29:57.140 But, if you own any kind of property, you have an advantage that no robot can meet, and we hope the government will keep it this way, that robots can't own property.
00:30:10.500 So, owning a home you can rent guarantees you have something that humans will want in the future, because real estate is limited, and now housing is limited, and robots can't own them.
00:30:23.260 So, if you own something that somebody has to rent, because they have no choice, they've got to live, then you've got something that's robot-proof.
00:30:31.680 If you're working for a salary, you are not robot-proof.
00:30:34.860 You're very vulnerable to robots.
00:30:36.760 So, if you're hugely rich, you buy single-family homes.
00:30:42.340 What do you do if you're not hugely rich?
00:30:45.640 Well, here's how I would orient my thinking.
00:30:49.820 Orient your thinking toward ownership, toward getting a hold of an asset.
00:30:55.100 Now, in the context of a business, it might be that you own trucks that people rent to do something.
00:31:04.040 You might own assets that no robot could ever own that get some job done.
00:31:12.480 So, think in terms of a physical thing you can own that doesn't depreciate.
00:31:17.500 Real estate actually appreciates in value while you can depreciate it on paper.
00:31:22.220 It's the ultimate.
00:31:24.060 So, look for things that don't depreciate, can be rented, and can become your future financial thing.
00:31:31.920 I mean, it might be, you've seen these little homes now that can kind of deliver and just plop in one place,
00:31:41.040 and maybe it's $100,000, but then you can rent it.
00:31:44.820 I would look into that.
00:31:46.420 Like, if you can pull together enough to put an ADU in the backyard, that might be your only income at some point.
00:31:54.760 So, think about that.
00:31:55.880 Now, the working against it is that maybe nobody will have any money to rent anything.
00:32:00.900 So, but think about the robot future.
00:32:06.360 Make sure you own something, because robots can't own something.
00:32:10.100 That's the only defense.
00:32:12.300 Now, the way I do it is owning an intellectual property.
00:32:15.580 So, I own the, you know, the rights to Dilbert.
00:32:21.540 But, you know, at some point, I suppose the robots and AI will write a comic that's, you know, funnier and free.
00:32:28.460 So, I can't last forever.
00:32:30.660 But I do think ownership is going to last for a while.
00:32:34.580 All right.
00:32:35.240 President Xi has arrived.
00:32:36.980 And there's some video of him showing off.
00:32:42.080 And I thought it was, you know, you should be a little bit more polite if you're visiting somebody's country.
00:32:48.720 So, President Xi is visiting San Francisco.
00:32:54.100 And the video of him arriving shows him at the top of the steps from his airplane.
00:33:00.460 And then Xi is walking down the steps.
00:33:03.360 And it's gross.
00:33:05.200 It's gross.
00:33:05.860 Let me do my impression of him walking down the steps.
00:33:08.540 And I'm, like, really put off by it.
00:33:11.720 It goes like this.
00:33:15.540 Hello, everybody.
00:33:16.920 Hello, everybody.
00:33:17.700 And I'm sickened.
00:33:18.600 I'm sickened by it.
00:33:20.020 Because to show off like that in front of our president, our president who can't walk on the downstairs,
00:33:27.440 and he's like, look at me.
00:33:30.000 I can walk down the stairs.
00:33:31.680 No problem.
00:33:33.360 Look at this.
00:33:34.260 And I'm, like, oh, that's so gross.
00:33:37.480 That's so gross.
00:33:38.240 You could be a little bit more polite as an invited guest.
00:33:42.220 I would expect, you know, it had to be me.
00:33:45.080 I would have slipped a little bit.
00:33:47.560 You know?
00:33:48.300 Because you like to make...
00:33:49.940 You've seen our leaders visit other countries, right?
00:33:52.880 And sometimes they'll even wear the local ceremonial clothing.
00:33:58.920 I mean, he should have at least, like, slipped on the third one, like, oh, ha, ha, ha, oh, good.
00:34:04.480 And then we could do some pacing and leading, and then they could make a deal.
00:34:09.360 But I think he blew his big chance there by just walking down the stairs.
00:34:13.120 Apparently, they've already agreed on some kind of limits on using AI on the nuclear weapons arsenal.
00:34:25.120 And people are saying it might be a bad idea.
00:34:28.220 To which I think, restricting AI from deciding to launch nuclear weapons might be the simplest decision any human ever made.
00:34:38.440 Why are we arguing about that one?
00:34:42.160 You know, first of all, it should be obvious.
00:34:44.060 I can't imagine any country would want to put AI onto their nuclear weapons in a way that would make them launch themselves or be unpredictable.
00:34:54.460 So, I guess that's an easy one.
00:34:58.880 Now, as you know, the streets of San Francisco were cleaned up.
00:35:02.420 Now, you may not know that the homeless and also all of the excrement from the sidewalks, they were temporarily moved to Oakland.
00:35:14.480 And once President Xi is gone, then the homeless will be repatriated back.
00:35:20.120 They'll take the feces and return it back to the sidewalks of San Francisco, repatriating the feces.
00:35:27.180 And that's the plan.
00:35:28.300 Now, that was literally a joke I wrote yesterday for my comic, Robots Read News, that you can only see on the locals' platform.
00:35:38.080 But I saw a tweet today that suggested they really did move the homeless to Oakland.
00:35:45.300 Can anybody confirm that?
00:35:47.400 Did anybody see a news story in which, in the real world, they actually moved the homeless to Oakland?
00:35:53.680 I just want to make sure that really happened.
00:35:55.560 And you know why that would be funny?
00:36:00.040 Because it's the only place you could move them that's close that they couldn't walk back.
00:36:05.780 Because you can't walk over that bridge.
00:36:08.660 So, they're putting them on the other side of the bay.
00:36:11.880 If they put them anywhere in the south bay, they would just walk back.
00:36:17.100 So, they had to make it hard.
00:36:22.160 Anyway.
00:36:24.360 More details on this Trump trial about the valuations of his properties that the government, or the DA, says he overvalued.
00:36:32.640 So, Don Jr. has testified now, and I guess the accountants have or will testify.
00:36:38.400 But here's where that trial is going.
00:36:40.040 It won't be clear who came up with the estimates.
00:36:45.800 Because I think the Trumps are all saying, well, we didn't come up with that estimate.
00:36:50.180 Or, you know, that was just conversation.
00:36:52.860 And then the accountants are like, well, we don't come up with estimates.
00:36:56.660 You know, we just take your word for it.
00:36:58.700 So, it's actually, so far the trial has been unable to identify anybody who came up with the estimates.
00:37:08.860 Like, where did they come from?
00:37:10.460 The most basic fact in the trial is, who came up with the estimates?
00:37:16.040 And they don't seem to be able to determine that.
00:37:19.200 So, what do you do if you're trying to decide on the merits of the case,
00:37:23.980 and they can't determine where it even came from?
00:37:26.880 Because if it came from the accountants, then the Trumps are innocent.
00:37:32.480 If it came from Trump, it would depend how he said it.
00:37:36.840 You know, was it just an opinion?
00:37:38.520 Or, you know, did somebody hear him say something once and made too much of it?
00:37:45.800 Rose says, Rose Blindstein,
00:37:49.320 Scott, this isn't smart.
00:37:53.080 Well, Rose, when I want to know what's smart,
00:37:56.880 I ask you.
00:37:59.660 So, please do tell me.
00:38:02.840 Or you could just act like a Democrat
00:38:04.640 and say there's something wrong with me
00:38:07.020 instead of the content of my discussion.
00:38:09.760 All of my trolls this morning seem legitimately drunk.
00:38:17.320 Like, actually, literally, just drunk.
00:38:20.560 You should see the comments I got this morning.
00:38:22.920 Every one of them, I could just say,
00:38:24.540 drinking?
00:38:26.200 And they just stop.
00:38:28.200 Because I think that's actually, literally, I think that's what's going on.
00:38:31.120 I didn't talk about this when it happened,
00:38:37.240 but I'm still blown away that the attempt to impeach Mayorkas
00:38:42.000 for his bad handling of the border failed.
00:38:46.580 And it failed because some Republicans,
00:38:49.100 you know, I guess eight of them,
00:38:50.700 decided not to.
00:38:52.140 What exactly was the argument for not impeaching him?
00:38:57.760 Did anybody even have an argument?
00:39:00.220 Somehow, I follow the news and never saw anybody say
00:39:03.160 why they voted to not impeach him.
00:39:06.480 Because to me, that's just a slam dunk.
00:39:09.100 That's the most obvious impeachment I've ever seen.
00:39:13.040 Now, is it just because he was following orders?
00:39:16.540 You know, maybe.
00:39:17.400 Maybe because he was following orders?
00:39:21.660 I don't know.
00:39:22.340 That one just baffles me how that went.
00:39:25.860 I suppose that's a follow-the-money situation, right?
00:39:29.160 Is that one of those you assume corruption
00:39:31.040 on some of the eight Republicans?
00:39:40.160 Yeah, you think the cartels bought off the Republicans?
00:39:45.600 Here's what I'd say.
00:39:46.520 If you've seen news reports
00:39:48.360 in which the Republicans who voted against it
00:39:51.360 gave you a reason for it,
00:39:54.480 this sounds like a real reason.
00:39:55.940 Even if you don't agree with it,
00:39:57.860 does it sound like a real reason?
00:40:00.380 Because I don't know that anybody offered a real reason.
00:40:04.160 Did they?
00:40:05.820 Oh, it was trivializing impeachment.
00:40:08.000 Is that what it was?
00:40:10.180 This doesn't look trivial to me.
00:40:11.880 To me, the open border and the destruction of the United States
00:40:17.020 is like a peak concern.
00:40:21.100 Anyway, I don't understand that one,
00:40:22.820 so I'm going to assume corruption.
00:40:23.720 Assume corruption.
00:40:26.680 Poor Glenn Greenwald,
00:40:28.160 by refusing to be on a team
00:40:33.500 and just calling things like he sees them.
00:40:36.040 He's getting quite a bit of pushback.
00:40:39.120 So I guess he's not as...
00:40:40.940 I guess he's insufficiently pro-Israel,
00:40:43.140 so he's getting a lot of pushback.
00:40:45.560 Anyway, I told you there's the Will Smith rumors,
00:40:47.840 but the bigger part of it is that his former assistant,
00:40:53.520 who's allegedly his former best friend,
00:40:56.520 claims that he walked in and watched Will Smith
00:41:00.940 as, let's say, the recipient of some vigorous gay sex.
00:41:04.960 Now, what have I told you about celebrity news?
00:41:12.080 Can you tell me?
00:41:14.120 What have I told you about celebrity news?
00:41:16.440 Because it's actually never real.
00:41:20.100 It's so far from being real
00:41:22.000 that your opinion of this story
00:41:24.420 should be that you didn't hear any story at all.
00:41:28.020 The quality of the credibility of this story
00:41:31.440 is in the category of things
00:41:33.980 that never turn out to be true.
00:41:36.420 And in fact, Will Smith is threatening
00:41:37.980 to sue him for saying it,
00:41:40.780 which would be sort of a baller move
00:41:44.160 if it were true.
00:41:46.440 Now, I'm not saying it couldn't be true,
00:41:49.780 but that would be true of every human being.
00:41:52.100 There could be something they're doing
00:41:53.460 that you don't know about and don't care.
00:41:55.020 And by the way, let me say as carefully
00:41:57.460 and clearly as I can,
00:41:59.440 I don't care.
00:42:02.280 Apparently, he was behind a locked door.
00:42:04.400 That's the accusation.
00:42:05.780 So if it were true, it would have no meaning
00:42:08.280 in any of our lives.
00:42:09.280 It would just be his personal life.
00:42:11.640 So I don't care about it.
00:42:14.160 But I'm going to back Will Smith on this one
00:42:17.560 and say that you should assume it's not true.
00:42:22.240 And it's because it's in a category
00:42:24.080 of celebrity public figure accusations
00:42:27.160 that generally are not true.
00:42:30.260 You could usually bet against them and be correct.
00:42:32.880 So I don't know what's true,
00:42:34.160 but I'm definitely going with
00:42:36.980 innocent until proven guilty on this.
00:42:39.340 So I'm pro Will Smith
00:42:41.400 on the don't believe accusations like that.
00:42:46.200 Now, in this case, it comes from a named source.
00:42:48.720 So that gives it more credibility.
00:42:52.440 But I'd certainly wait to hear
00:42:54.720 at least one other source.
00:42:57.860 This is the type where
00:42:59.460 if you're two or three people
00:43:01.340 who are close to him say,
00:43:02.740 yeah, we all knew it or something like that,
00:43:05.100 then maybe.
00:43:06.840 But one person
00:43:07.900 who doesn't work for him anymore,
00:43:11.560 which gets you to potentially disgruntled,
00:43:14.000 we don't know,
00:43:15.180 and he's getting a lot of attention for it.
00:43:17.080 But that's a red flag.
00:43:20.960 So I would say
00:43:22.900 don't believe this one.
00:43:26.020 Target has a new Santa Claus you can buy.
00:43:31.540 So if you'd like to get
00:43:32.360 a little Santa Claus decoration,
00:43:33.920 they've now got one that's super inclusive.
00:43:36.920 It's intersectional.
00:43:37.940 They've got a black disabled Santa.
00:43:42.760 Black disabled Santa.
00:43:45.480 Well, black's fine,
00:43:46.660 but disabled.
00:43:49.440 Now, you're starting to stretch my disbelief.
00:43:53.320 I already find it difficult to believe
00:43:55.740 that Santa can fit down the chimney.
00:44:00.020 I mean, already I've got a problem with it.
00:44:02.300 I don't know about the math
00:44:03.940 of getting to every house in one night.
00:44:06.860 The flying reindeer,
00:44:08.540 especially the one that can light the way
00:44:10.340 with its glowing nose.
00:44:14.120 I believe all of that stuff.
00:44:16.120 All right.
00:44:16.420 I believe all of that.
00:44:17.860 But how do you get a wheelchair down the chimney?
00:44:21.000 That's too far.
00:44:22.080 Too far.
00:44:23.980 Now you're starting to make me question
00:44:26.400 whether Santa's real at all.
00:44:29.580 All right.
00:44:30.120 What do you think about the issue of,
00:44:35.160 I think this was a Rasmussen,
00:44:37.440 about abortion?
00:44:41.140 Apparently,
00:44:43.240 there's a 10-point advantage of Democrats
00:44:46.740 in, quote,
00:44:47.980 handling abortion.
00:44:49.040 Do you think abortion's going to be
00:44:50.880 a big topic for this election?
00:44:57.280 Or do you think that
00:44:58.360 kicking it back to the states
00:45:00.180 takes it a little bit off the,
00:45:04.260 at least the federal level?
00:45:07.400 I don't know.
00:45:07.940 I think it's going to matter.
00:45:09.500 I think it's going to matter a lot.
00:45:11.480 But we'll see.
00:45:12.040 It is probably the biggest thing
00:45:17.400 that the Democrats have an advantage on.
00:45:22.360 All right.
00:45:23.540 21% don't think abortion will be important.
00:45:27.680 21%.
00:45:28.120 That's getting pretty close to one quarter.
00:45:33.120 All right.
00:45:33.940 So the big news is
00:45:35.320 you can now tell
00:45:36.860 what the Democrats' approach will be
00:45:38.820 to the election in terms of Trump.
00:45:40.560 if Trump is the nominee.
00:45:43.900 They're preparing what I call
00:45:45.320 the big lie version 2.0.
00:45:47.880 I'm going to see if I can label it that.
00:45:49.940 I'm going to try to make that a thing.
00:45:51.400 The big lie version 2.0
00:45:53.100 is, first of all,
00:45:54.080 you know that the Democrats said
00:45:55.840 that Trump had the big lie.
00:45:59.540 And the big lie was that
00:46:00.760 the election was rigged.
00:46:02.160 So that was their branding.
00:46:04.200 But, of course, for Republicans
00:46:05.740 and people who are not brainwashed,
00:46:08.680 the big lie was
00:46:09.860 the insurrection claim itself
00:46:11.500 and the claim that Trump
00:46:13.300 is a dictator by nature
00:46:15.320 and had no intention
00:46:18.360 of turning over power
00:46:19.460 no matter what
00:46:20.240 and that he was basically
00:46:23.260 Hitler and waiting.
00:46:24.880 So they're starting to
00:46:26.740 roll the sound again.
00:46:28.580 So here are the early signs.
00:46:31.360 So there's Bill Pasquale, Jr.
00:46:33.300 He's a congressperson
00:46:35.940 in New Jersey, I think.
00:46:39.260 And he actually tweeted this
00:46:42.220 with a picture of like a tank
00:46:43.540 with a Trump sign on it.
00:46:45.060 He goes,
00:46:45.580 Donald Trump is openly planning
00:46:47.340 to impose a military dictatorship.
00:46:50.680 Really?
00:46:52.540 Where is he openly doing that?
00:46:54.400 And put tanks in the streets
00:46:57.620 against his enemies
00:46:58.580 if he sees his power again.
00:47:01.060 I'm going to post this repeatedly
00:47:02.580 so no one can say
00:47:03.940 they haven't been told.
00:47:06.680 Now,
00:47:08.040 correct me if I'm wrong.
00:47:12.040 Isn't one of the charges,
00:47:13.680 maybe it's not anymore,
00:47:15.040 against Trump
00:47:15.780 that he, quote,
00:47:17.100 incited violence on January 6th?
00:47:20.120 Isn't that a thing
00:47:21.400 that you can get in trouble
00:47:23.280 for inciting violence?
00:47:27.080 Is Bill Pasquale, Jr.
00:47:29.100 not inciting violence
00:47:30.520 by lying
00:47:34.100 and saying that it's obvious
00:47:35.720 that Trump is going to be Hitler?
00:47:38.920 Calling somebody Hitler,
00:47:40.940 if you mean it,
00:47:42.400 like you're not just exaggerating
00:47:44.160 in an obvious way,
00:47:45.320 this suggests he means it
00:47:47.200 in a literal way.
00:47:48.240 If you're telling somebody
00:47:50.460 that a politician
00:47:51.600 who has a good chance
00:47:53.080 of being elected,
00:47:53.940 likely to be, actually,
00:47:55.680 if you're telling
00:47:56.360 half of the country
00:47:57.340 that he's literally Hitler,
00:48:00.320 as opposed to
00:48:01.520 in some hyperbolic way,
00:48:03.540 you're inciting violence.
00:48:05.040 How else can you see it?
00:48:07.500 This is basically
00:48:08.460 telling Democrats
00:48:09.500 it's okay to kill Republicans.
00:48:12.620 That's how I take it.
00:48:14.260 If they were to believe
00:48:15.560 this to be literally true,
00:48:17.060 and he's selling it
00:48:18.640 as literally true.
00:48:20.120 He's very careful
00:48:20.920 to make sure you know
00:48:22.500 he means literally.
00:48:25.320 Right?
00:48:26.180 If that's the actual message,
00:48:28.480 and it looks like it is,
00:48:30.060 that is inciting violence.
00:48:32.520 I don't see any other way.
00:48:33.700 He should be immediately
00:48:35.100 impeached.
00:48:37.640 Is that not grounds
00:48:40.600 for impeachment?
00:48:43.640 He's literally,
00:48:44.740 he's trying to create
00:48:46.260 an insurrection.
00:48:47.920 He's literally inciting
00:48:49.280 an insurrection
00:48:49.880 in a way far more
00:48:51.800 than Trump did.
00:48:53.320 I mean,
00:48:53.540 Trump never came close
00:48:54.940 to this.
00:48:57.180 Would you agree
00:48:57.880 that Trump never came close
00:48:59.360 to this level
00:49:00.580 of inciting violence?
00:49:02.460 Fair?
00:49:02.920 Is that your opinion as well,
00:49:05.880 or am I going too far on that?
00:49:07.640 To me,
00:49:08.100 it's obvious
00:49:08.600 that these are not even
00:49:09.880 in the same ballpark.
00:49:11.620 Trump was literally saying
00:49:12.960 protest,
00:49:14.080 you know,
00:49:14.380 peacefully.
00:49:15.840 Like,
00:49:16.400 literally in those words.
00:49:18.420 And here he's telling you
00:49:19.480 that this Hitler-like dictator
00:49:21.920 is going to have tanks
00:49:22.720 in the street.
00:49:23.820 What would be
00:49:24.400 the reasonable response
00:49:26.300 if you believe
00:49:27.480 this were true?
00:49:28.700 The reasonable response
00:49:30.020 would be violence
00:49:30.900 if he got elected.
00:49:33.540 You know,
00:49:33.680 before then
00:49:34.280 it would be,
00:49:35.300 you know,
00:49:35.540 vote against him.
00:49:37.600 But you're setting it up
00:49:38.820 for if he wins
00:49:39.840 and the polls say he will,
00:49:41.940 you're basically
00:49:43.260 giving the green light
00:49:45.260 to violence
00:49:45.940 because everybody thinks
00:49:47.620 that violence against Hitler
00:49:48.720 is appropriate.
00:49:50.060 Everybody.
00:49:53.400 All right,
00:49:54.000 so that's the
00:49:54.640 big lie version two.
00:49:56.500 Now,
00:49:56.920 here's how the
00:49:57.840 Republicans,
00:49:59.140 and Trump in particular,
00:50:00.500 should respond
00:50:01.220 to the big lie.
00:50:03.620 There's three things
00:50:04.680 that don't work.
00:50:06.160 I'll list those first.
00:50:07.800 If they say
00:50:08.460 you're going to be a dictator
00:50:09.420 and take over the country,
00:50:10.640 here's what doesn't work.
00:50:12.760 Ignoring it.
00:50:14.600 Doesn't work to ignore it.
00:50:16.820 Does not work.
00:50:18.700 Number two,
00:50:20.100 saying your side is worse.
00:50:22.880 You're the real Hitlers.
00:50:25.000 Does not work
00:50:25.960 because the other side
00:50:27.480 is completely,
00:50:29.040 you know,
00:50:29.380 they can't hear you
00:50:30.400 coming from the Republican side.
00:50:33.860 Third thing that doesn't work
00:50:35.280 is being extra nice
00:50:36.740 so that it's really
00:50:38.320 super obvious
00:50:39.080 you're not Hitler.
00:50:40.780 Doesn't work
00:50:41.660 because the other side
00:50:43.360 controls the media.
00:50:44.840 So they'll just,
00:50:46.120 they'll just invent things
00:50:47.780 that make you look like Hitler.
00:50:49.140 Even if you're
00:50:49.980 the nicest person
00:50:50.920 in the world
00:50:51.420 and you did the most
00:50:52.800 anti-Hitler things
00:50:53.880 you could ever do,
00:50:54.620 won't make any difference.
00:50:56.320 There is only one thing
00:50:57.460 that can work.
00:50:58.960 You have to mock
00:51:00.000 this bullshit
00:51:00.820 out of existence.
00:51:03.920 You have to mock
00:51:04.840 the January 6th people
00:51:06.340 who believe
00:51:07.420 that Republicans
00:51:08.240 take over countries
00:51:09.360 without bringing guns.
00:51:11.000 You have to mock
00:51:11.840 anybody who thinks
00:51:12.560 that trespassing
00:51:13.380 is the first step
00:51:14.280 to an overthrow.
00:51:16.220 You have to mock
00:51:17.160 anybody who thinks
00:51:18.100 that delaying a process
00:51:19.900 in one building
00:51:20.860 for one day
00:51:21.740 somehow takes over
00:51:24.240 a country.
00:51:24.680 You have to mock
00:51:26.300 them for thinking
00:51:27.060 that having
00:51:27.740 alternate electors
00:51:30.120 somehow is a takeover
00:51:32.240 of the country.
00:51:33.340 You have to mock
00:51:34.280 them for the fact
00:51:35.440 that Don Jr.,
00:51:36.820 according to the documents
00:51:38.180 we've seen on January 6th,
00:51:39.920 was completely unaware
00:51:41.240 that there was some kind
00:51:43.000 of insurrection planned.
00:51:44.620 Don Jr.
00:51:46.060 If there's one fact
00:51:47.540 that you can take
00:51:48.400 to the bank
00:51:49.060 that proves
00:51:50.360 there was no
00:51:51.380 planned insurrection,
00:51:52.480 it's Don Jr.'s
00:51:54.680 private messaging
00:51:55.480 in which he very
00:51:56.740 obviously was not
00:51:57.760 part of any kind
00:51:58.560 of even conversation
00:52:00.140 about some kind
00:52:01.740 of an insurrection.
00:52:03.120 Right?
00:52:03.440 If you know Don Jr.
00:52:04.880 didn't know about it,
00:52:06.760 it wasn't there.
00:52:09.700 I mean,
00:52:10.240 that's the minimum.
00:52:11.620 The minimum would be
00:52:13.080 for President Trump
00:52:14.860 to get Don Jr.
00:52:15.960 on the same side.
00:52:17.520 You can't even imagine
00:52:18.880 a scenario in which
00:52:19.940 he would try to
00:52:20.940 take over the country
00:52:21.760 and his son
00:52:22.240 was on the other side.
00:52:23.720 That's ridiculous.
00:52:25.120 So this whole thing
00:52:25.900 is so stupid
00:52:27.020 that you should
00:52:29.680 mock it
00:52:30.280 in a hilarious way,
00:52:32.280 much like RFK Jr.
00:52:33.780 mocked the coverage
00:52:34.640 of him going barefoot.
00:52:36.300 You cannot take
00:52:37.440 this shit seriously.
00:52:38.900 You have to make
00:52:39.540 them look like clowns
00:52:40.960 for pushing
00:52:42.220 the worst thing.
00:52:43.760 And the other thing is,
00:52:45.100 can you name
00:52:45.760 what Trump did
00:52:46.480 in the first term
00:52:47.880 that qualified
00:52:49.160 as the Hitler dictator?
00:52:50.400 What was it?
00:52:53.060 The only thing it was
00:52:54.380 was the thing
00:52:55.040 that the Democrats did,
00:52:57.400 which was try to turn
00:52:58.740 January 6th
00:52:59.580 into something
00:53:00.060 it obviously wasn't.
00:53:01.720 That's it.
00:53:02.980 And if they had not
00:53:04.100 rescued their narrative
00:53:06.180 on that last day,
00:53:08.260 just think about it.
00:53:09.260 They called him
00:53:09.800 Hitler for, what,
00:53:11.540 five and a half years straight?
00:53:13.860 And then he did
00:53:14.820 no Hitler things,
00:53:15.800 and their narrative
00:53:17.280 had gone to zero
00:53:18.360 because he's going
00:53:19.060 to walk out of office
00:53:20.080 not doing any
00:53:21.280 Hitler stuff.
00:53:23.300 But they got him.
00:53:24.900 On that last day,
00:53:26.080 they twisted the news
00:53:27.380 to turn it into
00:53:28.240 Hitler stuff
00:53:28.920 when clearly
00:53:30.140 it was the opposite.
00:53:31.240 But they controlled
00:53:31.900 the news enough
00:53:32.540 that they could
00:53:33.040 just grab out
00:53:36.000 that one
00:53:36.800 last Hail Mary.
00:53:39.900 But they did
00:53:40.580 make it work.
00:53:41.660 They did make it stick.
00:53:42.640 So mock that shit.
00:53:46.740 All right.
00:53:47.760 There's another
00:53:48.480 Soros prosecutor
00:53:49.720 who got defeated
00:53:51.700 narrowly in,
00:53:53.100 where was it,
00:53:54.160 Virginia.
00:53:55.560 And I told you
00:53:56.500 that my Soros-backed
00:53:58.700 prosecutor,
00:53:59.360 where I am,
00:54:00.140 Pamela Price,
00:54:01.480 there is a recall
00:54:02.480 petition that's going
00:54:03.440 around.
00:54:04.280 So there is some
00:54:05.020 pushback.
00:54:06.240 But let me ask you
00:54:07.280 this.
00:54:08.480 Have you ever seen
00:54:09.320 an interview
00:54:09.840 with Alex Soros
00:54:11.880 asking him to
00:54:13.580 explain the
00:54:14.580 thinking behind
00:54:15.340 the open borders
00:54:16.200 and the DAs?
00:54:19.960 I haven't.
00:54:23.420 So now that
00:54:25.140 Sam Bankman
00:54:27.520 freed is out
00:54:28.700 of the political
00:54:30.000 picture,
00:54:30.940 that would make
00:54:32.540 the Soros
00:54:33.260 the number one
00:54:34.340 donator to the
00:54:36.920 Democrats,
00:54:37.460 doesn't it?
00:54:37.880 So don't you
00:54:39.960 think that the
00:54:40.940 leader of the
00:54:42.380 number one
00:54:42.980 Democrat donor
00:54:44.400 and the person
00:54:45.660 who is most
00:54:46.380 responsible,
00:54:47.480 we think,
00:54:48.460 for the border
00:54:49.680 disaster and the
00:54:51.460 destruction of
00:54:52.180 American cities,
00:54:54.220 now just hold this
00:54:54.980 in your mind.
00:54:56.340 I've never seen
00:54:57.100 him interviewed.
00:54:59.260 Not with a
00:55:00.720 serious interview.
00:55:01.640 I think I've seen
00:55:02.360 him on a friendly
00:55:03.140 where they didn't
00:55:04.260 ask him anything
00:55:04.920 serious.
00:55:05.460 But have you
00:55:06.580 ever seen him
00:55:07.240 answer the
00:55:08.160 question,
00:55:09.240 how are these
00:55:09.800 liberal DAs and
00:55:10.980 the open borders,
00:55:12.440 how is that
00:55:12.900 working for
00:55:13.480 America?
00:55:14.240 And what is
00:55:14.660 even the
00:55:15.940 thinking behind
00:55:16.700 it?
00:55:17.240 Just defend it
00:55:18.120 as a political
00:55:19.960 strategy and
00:55:20.720 explain it.
00:55:22.300 That is the
00:55:23.020 biggest dog not
00:55:24.020 barking I've ever
00:55:24.860 seen in my
00:55:25.320 life.
00:55:26.340 Now I'd like to
00:55:27.280 think that the
00:55:28.840 right-leaning
00:55:29.680 media has been
00:55:31.580 trying very hard
00:55:32.420 to get him on
00:55:33.020 camera and
00:55:35.060 failing, right?
00:55:36.300 You can imagine
00:55:37.180 that he would
00:55:37.700 never take an
00:55:38.380 interview at
00:55:38.960 Fox News or
00:55:39.820 Breitbart.
00:55:41.220 Would that be
00:55:41.740 fair to say?
00:55:43.000 There's no way
00:55:43.760 he's ever going
00:55:44.280 to, but he
00:55:44.880 might do an
00:55:45.320 MSNBC hit because
00:55:47.440 it's just going
00:55:47.960 to be a
00:55:48.220 friendly.
00:55:49.820 So here's
00:55:52.080 what Trump
00:55:53.360 and Vivek
00:55:54.180 should demand.
00:55:57.260 I'm throwing
00:55:57.840 Vivek in there
00:55:58.600 because he's the
00:55:59.520 best communicator
00:56:00.340 in the race
00:56:00.800 and I'm
00:56:01.900 endorsing him.
00:56:04.240 They should
00:56:04.900 demand that
00:56:06.280 Alex Soros
00:56:07.160 sit for a
00:56:08.040 real interview.
00:56:10.040 In fact, it
00:56:10.920 could be even
00:56:11.960 with Vivek.
00:56:13.920 Wouldn't you
00:56:14.320 love to see
00:56:14.840 Vivek say,
00:56:15.540 look, Alex
00:56:16.600 Soros, you're
00:56:18.320 one of the
00:56:18.660 biggest players
00:56:19.320 in the country
00:56:19.940 and we have a
00:56:21.440 disagreement, but
00:56:22.300 we've had no
00:56:22.880 conversation about
00:56:23.800 it.
00:56:24.420 I invite you to
00:56:25.540 my podcast to
00:56:26.500 explain why
00:56:27.580 what you're doing
00:56:28.280 is good for the
00:56:29.340 country and
00:56:30.860 I would almost
00:56:32.500 ignore what
00:56:33.620 the other
00:56:34.320 Democrats said.
00:56:36.240 You know, if
00:56:36.620 you were Trump,
00:56:37.760 let's say you
00:56:38.180 got the
00:56:38.480 nomination or
00:56:39.500 Vivek, let's
00:56:40.200 say you get
00:56:40.580 the nomination.
00:56:42.260 I think you
00:56:43.160 could say
00:56:43.560 there's no
00:56:44.040 point in
00:56:44.720 debating
00:56:45.360 Biden because
00:56:47.280 he's dead,
00:56:48.840 but I'd like
00:56:49.740 to do a
00:56:50.300 debate with
00:56:50.900 Alex Soros.
00:56:53.440 Just imagine
00:56:54.280 that news hit.
00:56:55.980 I want to
00:56:56.680 do a debate,
00:56:57.440 but not with
00:56:57.900 Biden.
00:56:58.220 I want to
00:56:59.440 do it with
00:56:59.760 Alex Soros
00:57:00.560 because our
00:57:01.760 biggest problems
00:57:02.560 are directly
00:57:03.180 related to
00:57:03.880 Soros.
00:57:04.540 They're not
00:57:05.120 even directly
00:57:05.740 related to
00:57:06.380 Biden.
00:57:07.300 So I don't
00:57:07.700 want to talk
00:57:08.100 about the
00:57:08.380 person who's
00:57:08.820 not in
00:57:09.180 charge.
00:57:10.380 I want to
00:57:10.760 talk about
00:57:11.200 money is in
00:57:12.020 charge, right?
00:57:14.220 The money
00:57:14.900 person is always
00:57:15.500 in charge.
00:57:16.160 So I want to
00:57:16.740 talk to the
00:57:17.220 person in
00:57:17.660 charge.
00:57:18.120 I only want
00:57:18.800 to debate
00:57:19.240 Alex Soros.
00:57:21.200 Just imagine
00:57:22.080 the news
00:57:25.340 coverage of
00:57:25.920 that.
00:57:26.640 I only want
00:57:27.620 to talk to
00:57:28.140 him because
00:57:29.240 nobody else
00:57:29.740 matters in
00:57:30.220 this conversation.
00:57:33.160 And why
00:57:33.780 is that
00:57:34.080 missing?
00:57:35.480 Like, why
00:57:35.980 isn't that
00:57:36.600 happening?
00:57:37.940 I don't know.
00:57:39.320 It's like a
00:57:40.160 big mystery to
00:57:40.820 me.
00:57:41.400 The most
00:57:41.900 important
00:57:42.340 question from
00:57:43.720 the most
00:57:44.160 important player,
00:57:46.000 and nobody's
00:57:46.720 even asking
00:57:47.240 him.
00:57:48.880 Nobody's even
00:57:49.640 asking him the
00:57:50.320 question.
00:57:50.600 All right.
00:57:54.680 Israel
00:57:55.160 apparently is
00:57:56.940 making progress
00:57:58.040 at the
00:57:58.500 El Shifa
00:57:59.200 hospital in
00:58:00.560 Gaza.
00:58:01.520 We don't
00:58:01.880 know the
00:58:02.180 details and
00:58:02.840 never will
00:58:03.380 because it's
00:58:03.840 fog of war,
00:58:04.700 but they
00:58:05.600 seem to be
00:58:06.600 making inroads
00:58:07.800 in a very
00:58:08.540 large compound.
00:58:09.960 There are
00:58:10.140 lots of
00:58:10.500 civilians there.
00:58:12.240 It won't
00:58:13.040 be pretty.
00:58:14.420 It will not
00:58:14.940 be as
00:58:15.340 surgical as
00:58:16.420 you wish it
00:58:17.160 could be.
00:58:18.400 But I do
00:58:19.220 think that
00:58:19.660 they're doing
00:58:20.100 their very
00:58:20.600 best because
00:58:21.660 the entire
00:58:22.080 world is
00:58:22.540 watching.
00:58:23.940 And anything
00:58:24.640 less than
00:58:25.240 their very
00:58:25.640 best would
00:58:26.140 be,
00:58:26.600 frankly,
00:58:27.960 unacceptable.
00:58:29.240 But it
00:58:29.680 does look
00:58:30.080 like they're
00:58:30.420 doing it.
00:58:32.060 Now, I'll
00:58:32.400 tell you one
00:58:32.820 other thing
00:58:33.220 I'm feeling
00:58:34.260 watching the
00:58:36.680 Israeli response
00:58:37.920 to this.
00:58:39.280 Now, even
00:58:39.800 though you
00:58:40.520 can criticize
00:58:41.160 why they
00:58:42.140 got caught
00:58:43.320 off guard
00:58:43.860 and they
00:58:44.260 didn't see
00:58:44.620 the attack
00:58:45.040 coming earlier,
00:58:46.100 that's a
00:58:46.480 fair set of
00:58:47.600 questions.
00:58:48.980 But since
00:58:49.680 then,
00:58:50.100 I believe
00:58:52.000 what we've
00:58:53.440 observed is
00:58:54.900 some of the
00:58:55.360 highest level
00:58:56.200 of just
00:58:57.340 sheer
00:58:57.660 competence.
00:59:00.220 And it's
00:59:01.940 making me
00:59:02.340 feel good.
00:59:03.480 Now, not
00:59:03.920 about war,
00:59:05.100 not about
00:59:05.560 what's happening
00:59:06.120 in Gaza.
00:59:07.420 You can't
00:59:07.900 feel good
00:59:08.380 about that,
00:59:09.200 of course.
00:59:10.080 But I feel
00:59:10.940 good that I'm
00:59:11.900 seeing people
00:59:12.700 display high
00:59:14.240 level capability
00:59:15.380 and competence.
00:59:16.780 today we
00:59:18.120 learned, you
00:59:18.720 know, Joel
00:59:19.080 Pollack is
00:59:19.580 over there
00:59:19.900 reporting the
00:59:21.180 most dangerous
00:59:21.760 job in the
00:59:22.300 world.
00:59:22.720 I can't
00:59:23.260 believe he's
00:59:23.620 over there.
00:59:24.380 But he's
00:59:25.260 talking about
00:59:25.740 how the
00:59:26.220 harvests have
00:59:27.180 been left
00:59:28.060 because I
00:59:28.720 guess the
00:59:29.180 Gaza workers
00:59:31.580 couldn't be
00:59:32.320 there to
00:59:32.620 harvest it.
00:59:33.760 But the
00:59:34.680 citizens of
00:59:37.000 Israel have
00:59:37.680 actually
00:59:38.240 organized and
00:59:40.600 from all walks
00:59:41.580 of life are
00:59:42.240 showing up in
00:59:42.840 the fields and
00:59:44.360 they're harvesting.
00:59:46.960 So even the
00:59:47.520 harvest is
00:59:48.100 happening.
00:59:49.320 Can you
00:59:49.600 imagine that
00:59:50.220 happening in
00:59:50.780 America?
00:59:51.920 Could you
00:59:52.260 imagine America
00:59:53.100 being so well
00:59:54.120 organized that
00:59:55.700 we could get
00:59:56.320 citizens to
00:59:57.220 leave whatever
00:59:57.720 they were doing,
00:59:58.500 probably even
00:59:59.280 retirees and
01:00:00.280 students and
01:00:00.940 everything else,
01:00:01.740 and that they
01:00:02.220 would meet in
01:00:02.660 one place and
01:00:03.280 they would pick
01:00:03.780 the fruit because
01:00:05.760 they were all on
01:00:06.780 one team?
01:00:08.020 It's hard to
01:00:08.660 imagine in
01:00:09.160 America, but
01:00:09.800 we're not under
01:00:10.360 that kind of
01:00:10.880 threat that also
01:00:11.980 drives you together.
01:00:13.560 So I'm going to
01:00:14.260 say that simply
01:00:15.520 watching Israel
01:00:17.300 handle this
01:00:18.180 politically,
01:00:20.140 persuasion-wise,
01:00:22.120 strategically,
01:00:23.640 militarily,
01:00:24.940 is really
01:00:26.520 hardening.
01:00:28.120 Like I'm just
01:00:29.020 seeing high-level
01:00:29.680 capability in
01:00:31.400 all those areas,
01:00:33.080 and it just
01:00:33.460 feels good that
01:00:34.220 humans can do
01:00:35.540 high-level
01:00:35.960 stuff.
01:00:37.380 It just feels
01:00:37.860 good.
01:00:41.040 But we'll see
01:00:42.320 what's happening
01:00:42.960 over there in
01:00:43.540 those tunnels
01:00:44.000 pretty soon.
01:00:47.760 I saw Dave
01:00:48.680 Rubin
01:00:49.000 criticizing
01:00:49.800 Justin Trudeau
01:00:51.020 because
01:00:54.580 Justin Trudeau
01:00:56.400 is calling for
01:00:56.960 a ceasefire,
01:00:57.800 I guess,
01:00:58.580 which makes
01:00:59.200 him look to
01:00:59.820 many people
01:01:00.360 a little bit
01:01:01.100 too pro-Hamas.
01:01:04.300 And Dave
01:01:05.020 said this about
01:01:05.880 Justin Trudeau.
01:01:07.800 He said,
01:01:08.280 Justin Trudeau
01:01:08.860 is an evil
01:01:09.460 communist piece
01:01:10.400 of shit.
01:01:11.680 Also, he
01:01:12.440 should just
01:01:12.840 come out of
01:01:13.340 the closet
01:01:13.720 already.
01:01:16.540 Now, I'm
01:01:18.460 not going to
01:01:19.680 compare my
01:01:20.340 gaydar to
01:01:21.440 Dave Rubin's.
01:01:23.080 I will allow
01:01:24.640 that his gaydar
01:01:25.440 might be stronger
01:01:26.160 than mine.
01:01:28.000 So I don't
01:01:28.680 have an opinion.
01:01:30.140 I'll just say
01:01:30.880 he looks like
01:01:31.520 the gayest
01:01:32.000 person I've
01:01:32.520 ever seen
01:01:32.880 in my life.
01:01:34.360 That doesn't
01:01:35.000 mean he is,
01:01:35.540 and there's
01:01:35.760 nothing wrong
01:01:36.260 with it,
01:01:36.660 and it's not
01:01:37.040 a lot of
01:01:37.160 criticism.
01:01:38.440 But if he
01:01:39.680 is gay,
01:01:40.960 I feel like
01:01:41.880 he does have
01:01:42.440 a responsibility
01:01:43.180 to maybe be
01:01:44.780 a little bit
01:01:45.200 more forthcoming
01:01:46.080 about it.
01:01:47.100 So I'm not
01:01:47.900 saying he's
01:01:48.320 gay.
01:01:49.100 I don't have
01:01:49.520 any special
01:01:50.160 insight in that.
01:01:51.200 I'm not saying
01:01:51.860 that that would
01:01:52.360 be a problem.
01:01:53.700 In fact,
01:01:54.140 it'd be kind
01:01:54.520 of cool to
01:01:54.960 have a gay
01:01:56.640 leader just
01:01:59.060 so we can
01:01:59.520 get that over
01:02:00.100 with.
01:02:01.320 Just get it
01:02:01.980 over with.
01:02:03.440 Can we just
01:02:04.140 get past it?
01:02:05.160 So it'd be
01:02:05.520 great to have
01:02:05.980 a gay leader
01:02:06.520 sooner or
01:02:06.960 later.
01:02:07.980 I don't
01:02:08.500 care about
01:02:08.840 that part.
01:02:09.940 But if he's
01:02:10.560 in the closet,
01:02:11.980 as Dave Rubin
01:02:12.780 says, and it
01:02:14.540 certainly looks
01:02:15.180 that way to
01:02:15.600 me, why
01:02:16.980 not just
01:02:17.280 come out?
01:02:18.740 Everybody's
01:02:19.100 going to be
01:02:19.340 cool with it.
01:02:19.860 It's not
01:02:20.080 going to be
01:02:20.300 a problem.
01:02:22.180 If that's
01:02:22.820 the case.
01:02:23.240 We don't
01:02:23.500 know that's
01:02:23.940 the case.
01:02:24.700 Anyway,
01:02:25.820 here's my
01:02:27.420 take on
01:02:28.400 this.
01:02:28.700 I think
01:02:29.400 Trudeau is
01:02:30.140 foreshadowing
01:02:31.040 a massive
01:02:33.940 importation
01:02:34.920 of Hamas
01:02:36.480 supporters
01:02:36.920 into Canada
01:02:37.700 because I
01:02:39.380 don't think
01:02:39.840 you can
01:02:40.160 be that
01:02:40.740 friendly to
01:02:41.620 the Hamas
01:02:43.700 civilians and
01:02:45.460 then say we're
01:02:46.100 not going to
01:02:46.460 let you come
01:02:46.920 into the
01:02:47.240 country and
01:02:48.440 help you in
01:02:49.180 your dire
01:02:49.600 situation.
01:02:50.940 So he's
01:02:52.040 either painted
01:02:52.660 himself into
01:02:53.360 a corner where
01:02:54.220 they will have
01:02:54.820 to accept a
01:02:56.220 lot of
01:02:56.700 refugees,
01:02:58.220 or he would
01:02:59.540 look like a
01:02:59.980 hypocrite,
01:03:00.440 and that's
01:03:02.120 not ideal.
01:03:03.360 So I
01:03:03.740 believe he's
01:03:04.500 now created
01:03:05.020 a situation
01:03:05.680 where the
01:03:06.900 design of
01:03:07.920 the Canadian
01:03:08.420 government
01:03:08.960 guarantees that
01:03:10.180 they will
01:03:10.540 fall by
01:03:12.800 design.
01:03:14.120 Because if
01:03:14.940 their design
01:03:15.540 is to bring
01:03:16.140 in people
01:03:16.660 whose attitude
01:03:17.900 is anti-democracy,
01:03:21.080 anti-Canadian,
01:03:23.140 what do you
01:03:23.740 think happens?
01:03:25.060 What happens
01:03:25.920 always when
01:03:27.340 that group of
01:03:28.060 people, whoever
01:03:28.780 it is, from
01:03:29.540 anywhere, the
01:03:30.480 people who are
01:03:30.900 anti-government,
01:03:31.780 if that group
01:03:32.280 gets big enough,
01:03:33.780 well, it
01:03:35.160 doesn't have to
01:03:35.720 be 80%.
01:03:36.740 At around 10%,
01:03:38.580 it's too late.
01:03:40.460 Because Islam
01:03:41.820 has a really
01:03:42.420 good system that
01:03:44.320 allows it to
01:03:45.000 grow and
01:03:45.540 reproduce and
01:03:46.500 procreate and
01:03:47.320 gain power over
01:03:48.180 time, and it's
01:03:49.560 a pretty solid
01:03:51.020 system.
01:03:52.220 But if they
01:03:52.700 don't get 10%,
01:03:53.920 they can't do
01:03:54.880 that.
01:03:56.020 But it looks
01:03:56.600 like Trudeau
01:03:57.780 is on the
01:03:58.500 path of
01:04:00.180 being a safe
01:04:01.000 space for
01:04:02.560 all Palestinians,
01:04:04.380 which on
01:04:05.160 paper sounds
01:04:05.780 like the
01:04:06.420 greatest,
01:04:07.320 kindest
01:04:07.820 humanitarian
01:04:08.520 thing, but
01:04:09.900 in practice
01:04:10.420 might get
01:04:11.160 you a lot
01:04:11.540 of Hamas
01:04:11.920 supporters on
01:04:12.560 the border.
01:04:13.740 So, no
01:04:14.800 joking aside,
01:04:15.700 we need to
01:04:16.180 get serious
01:04:16.780 about building
01:04:17.400 a border
01:04:17.820 with Canada.
01:04:20.860 Vivek is
01:04:21.400 totally right
01:04:22.000 about this.
01:04:22.500 as shocking
01:04:24.780 as that
01:04:25.240 sounds,
01:04:26.640 Canada is
01:04:27.640 designed to
01:04:29.180 fail.
01:04:30.540 So I'm not
01:04:31.360 saying something
01:04:32.080 strange could
01:04:32.860 happen.
01:04:33.680 I'm saying
01:04:34.200 they're designed
01:04:35.100 to fail.
01:04:36.300 They've created
01:04:37.020 a structure,
01:04:38.400 the woke
01:04:39.620 structure,
01:04:41.040 that guarantees
01:04:42.040 the importation
01:04:43.180 of people who
01:04:43.920 will destroy
01:04:44.440 their system.
01:04:46.540 What would
01:04:47.340 stop it?
01:04:48.920 Name anything
01:04:49.620 you see happening
01:04:50.420 that would stop
01:04:51.060 this from
01:04:51.880 happening,
01:04:52.500 Canada
01:04:52.780 falling.
01:04:53.660 There's
01:04:54.100 nothing.
01:04:55.080 It's designed
01:04:56.000 to fall.
01:04:58.480 So let's
01:04:59.280 treat it
01:04:59.820 seriously.
01:05:03.640 I saw
01:05:04.500 a bunch
01:05:05.720 of video
01:05:06.160 of Palestinian
01:05:07.700 children talking
01:05:08.780 about the
01:05:09.140 education they're
01:05:09.860 getting from
01:05:10.340 the United
01:05:11.000 Nations.
01:05:12.400 So the
01:05:12.720 UNRWA,
01:05:14.940 UNRWA,
01:05:16.680 do they
01:05:17.200 pronounce it
01:05:17.700 UNRWA?
01:05:19.460 But apparently
01:05:20.040 I didn't
01:05:20.340 know this.
01:05:20.780 So the
01:05:21.020 United Nations
01:05:21.780 must have
01:05:23.240 been providing
01:05:23.840 schools for
01:05:24.660 the Palestinians
01:05:25.260 and the
01:05:28.420 children were
01:05:29.400 all saying
01:05:29.980 without prompting,
01:05:31.520 they all said
01:05:32.440 that they're
01:05:32.800 being taught
01:05:33.260 to kill the
01:05:33.820 Jews and
01:05:34.560 the children
01:05:35.300 say, I want
01:05:35.840 to stab
01:05:36.240 them again
01:05:36.700 and again.
01:05:37.460 I want to
01:05:38.200 become a
01:05:38.600 suicide bomber.
01:05:40.680 So you
01:05:41.280 think your
01:05:41.800 schools are
01:05:42.380 bad?
01:05:44.060 You think
01:05:44.800 that your
01:05:45.240 kid isn't
01:05:45.720 learning to
01:05:46.200 read and
01:05:46.620 that's bad?
01:05:47.240 Well, that
01:05:47.540 is bad.
01:05:48.560 But over
01:05:49.440 there, they're
01:05:49.900 learning to
01:05:50.320 be suicide
01:05:50.940 bombers.
01:05:53.120 So if
01:05:55.040 you want to
01:05:55.380 look at it
01:05:55.800 on a
01:05:56.060 relative basis,
01:05:57.520 your kid
01:05:58.100 learning not
01:05:58.740 to read is
01:05:59.780 way better
01:06:00.440 than their
01:06:01.140 kids learning
01:06:01.740 to blow
01:06:02.100 themselves up.
01:06:03.300 Way better.
01:06:04.400 So you got
01:06:04.860 that going
01:06:05.200 for you.
01:06:07.380 Why in the
01:06:08.160 world is
01:06:09.440 the UN
01:06:09.960 allowing that?
01:06:11.620 Is it because
01:06:12.280 the UN also
01:06:13.340 agrees with it?
01:06:14.780 Is it because
01:06:15.460 they don't
01:06:15.920 manage it
01:06:16.340 well?
01:06:16.540 Is it
01:06:17.880 because the
01:06:18.520 UN sets
01:06:19.340 up the
01:06:19.660 structure but
01:06:20.340 the teachers
01:06:21.020 are all
01:06:21.460 locals so
01:06:22.340 there's nothing
01:06:22.740 they can do?
01:06:24.040 What is it
01:06:24.560 about this
01:06:25.120 that we
01:06:25.860 can't stop
01:06:26.420 this where
01:06:26.920 somebody doesn't
01:06:27.540 stop it?
01:06:29.460 So, but
01:06:31.000 I'll tell you
01:06:31.380 what the UN
01:06:31.880 has done.
01:06:32.700 They've made
01:06:33.220 it easy for
01:06:34.300 Israel to
01:06:36.120 kill as many
01:06:36.760 children in
01:06:37.560 Palestine as
01:06:38.800 is required to
01:06:39.520 get the job
01:06:40.000 done.
01:06:40.920 Because, you
01:06:41.500 know, everybody's
01:06:42.020 playing the
01:06:42.540 don't kill our
01:06:43.180 babies, you
01:06:43.880 kill more
01:06:44.260 babies.
01:06:44.620 No, you
01:06:45.300 kill more
01:06:45.700 babies.
01:06:46.500 No, you
01:06:46.960 kill more
01:06:47.400 babies, but
01:06:48.500 you kill more
01:06:49.200 babies.
01:06:50.220 The whole war
01:06:51.020 became who
01:06:51.500 kills more
01:06:51.960 babies.
01:06:52.980 So whoever
01:06:53.540 could get an
01:06:54.180 excuse to
01:06:54.860 kill more
01:06:55.260 babies has an
01:06:56.500 advantage, and
01:06:57.560 the UN is
01:06:58.160 actually running
01:06:58.760 cover for
01:06:59.380 Israel.
01:07:00.400 They don't
01:07:00.720 mean to.
01:07:02.200 But if the
01:07:03.300 UN is going
01:07:03.840 to teach the
01:07:04.720 Palestinian children
01:07:05.900 to become
01:07:06.340 suicide bombers,
01:07:08.340 you tell me
01:07:09.100 how sad I
01:07:09.800 should be if
01:07:10.320 those kids get
01:07:10.980 killed.
01:07:11.320 there, I
01:07:13.900 said it
01:07:14.160 out loud.
01:07:16.160 You're not
01:07:16.760 supposed to
01:07:17.120 say that
01:07:17.460 out loud,
01:07:18.000 right?
01:07:19.140 But, you
01:07:19.620 know, I'm
01:07:19.920 cancelled, so.
01:07:21.920 Now, my
01:07:23.500 preference is
01:07:24.300 that no
01:07:24.900 babies are
01:07:25.420 killed anywhere.
01:07:27.220 You got that?
01:07:28.420 My preference
01:07:29.160 is there's no
01:07:30.660 war anywhere.
01:07:32.580 And the last
01:07:33.420 thing I'd want
01:07:33.960 is for any
01:07:34.500 children to be
01:07:35.120 killed because
01:07:35.700 they're the
01:07:36.260 ultimate
01:07:36.660 innocents.
01:07:38.580 But the
01:07:39.400 UN is making
01:07:40.100 it easy.
01:07:41.320 The UN is
01:07:42.020 providing
01:07:42.600 Israel with
01:07:45.620 all the
01:07:45.920 justification
01:07:46.480 anybody would
01:07:47.200 need.
01:07:48.580 Now, historically
01:07:49.920 children can
01:07:50.680 never be
01:07:51.120 combatants, but
01:07:52.540 they are
01:07:52.780 weaponized.
01:07:55.300 They have
01:07:55.840 been weaponized.
01:07:57.500 Yet, let me
01:07:57.980 tell you this.
01:07:58.860 Ethically, if
01:08:00.260 you saw a
01:08:00.780 10-year-old
01:08:01.300 child running
01:08:01.940 at you with
01:08:02.420 a suicide
01:08:02.880 vest, and
01:08:04.300 it was the
01:08:04.720 10th time
01:08:05.360 that month
01:08:05.880 a 10-year-old
01:08:07.100 with a suicide
01:08:07.700 vest came
01:08:08.380 running at
01:08:08.840 you, could
01:08:09.680 you blow
01:08:10.220 their head
01:08:10.580 off?
01:08:11.320 Of course.
01:08:13.120 Would it be
01:08:13.720 unethical or
01:08:14.500 immoral?
01:08:15.360 Nope.
01:08:16.520 Nope.
01:08:17.620 It would be
01:08:18.380 horrible beyond
01:08:19.680 belief, but
01:08:21.420 completely ethical
01:08:22.420 self-defense.
01:08:24.420 So, I don't
01:08:25.220 know where the
01:08:25.580 line is on
01:08:26.360 killing
01:08:27.740 innocents, but
01:08:28.860 the UN is
01:08:30.680 certainly moving
01:08:31.280 that line to
01:08:31.920 make it easier.
01:08:34.240 Which is not
01:08:35.260 good.
01:08:36.220 It's just, it
01:08:37.460 is.
01:08:39.320 All right.
01:08:41.300 There's some
01:08:41.960 talk, but I
01:08:43.080 don't think it's
01:08:43.620 confirmed, that
01:08:45.040 there's some
01:08:45.400 negotiations about
01:08:46.460 a three-day
01:08:47.100 truce that
01:08:48.060 may produce
01:08:48.940 50 hostages.
01:08:50.560 I don't
01:08:51.100 believe anything
01:08:51.640 about any of
01:08:52.260 that.
01:08:53.100 It's not
01:08:53.520 confirmed by
01:08:54.280 Israel.
01:08:57.320 If you're
01:08:58.040 Israel, would
01:08:58.640 you do a
01:08:59.180 three-day
01:08:59.760 stand-down
01:09:01.000 to get
01:09:02.840 50 hostages
01:09:05.660 back?
01:09:07.380 I think the
01:09:08.360 offer is
01:09:08.980 designed just
01:09:10.060 to make it
01:09:10.520 difficult for
01:09:11.680 Israel to
01:09:12.860 manage public
01:09:13.520 opinion.
01:09:16.020 I think that's
01:09:16.980 what it's
01:09:17.260 about.
01:09:18.200 So, Israel's
01:09:18.960 best play would
01:09:20.940 be to treat it
01:09:21.820 like there was
01:09:22.260 no offer at
01:09:22.980 all.
01:09:24.820 Now, might
01:09:25.380 that get 50
01:09:26.260 hostages killed
01:09:27.120 that wouldn't
01:09:27.560 get killed
01:09:28.280 otherwise?
01:09:29.320 There is no
01:09:30.360 way to know
01:09:30.980 that.
01:09:33.480 No way to
01:09:34.260 know it.
01:09:35.240 So, if you
01:09:35.840 don't know
01:09:36.340 it, sometimes
01:09:37.980 it makes sense
01:09:38.680 to see if
01:09:40.160 you can do
01:09:40.480 it.
01:09:41.120 But if
01:09:41.800 Hamas wants
01:09:43.060 you to stop
01:09:43.600 for three
01:09:44.040 days, it's
01:09:44.680 because they're
01:09:45.300 in bad
01:09:45.960 shape.
01:09:47.360 So, I feel
01:09:48.300 like I would
01:09:48.780 say no to
01:09:49.400 the offer.
01:09:50.500 Because, first
01:09:51.160 of all, you
01:09:51.480 don't know if
01:09:51.860 it's real.
01:09:52.880 You don't
01:09:53.440 know if 50
01:09:54.080 of them are
01:09:54.600 even alive.
01:09:55.500 You don't
01:09:55.820 have any
01:09:56.220 proof of
01:09:56.720 life.
01:09:58.200 I wouldn't
01:09:58.860 take the
01:09:59.200 deal.
01:09:59.460 would you?
01:10:02.840 I would
01:10:03.460 counter with
01:10:04.280 if you
01:10:07.000 give all
01:10:07.540 of them
01:10:07.780 to us,
01:10:09.100 we will
01:10:09.760 consider
01:10:10.200 talking.
01:10:11.840 But probably
01:10:12.960 I would just
01:10:13.480 destroy them
01:10:14.000 after they
01:10:14.400 give.
01:10:14.960 I mean,
01:10:15.640 Hamas knows
01:10:16.360 that, I
01:10:16.940 think, if
01:10:18.140 they give
01:10:18.460 all the
01:10:18.760 hostages
01:10:19.200 back,
01:10:20.640 they're going
01:10:21.680 to be fully
01:10:22.120 destroyed.
01:10:22.580 but they
01:10:23.900 also know
01:10:24.340 if they
01:10:24.640 don't give
01:10:25.260 the hostages
01:10:25.920 back,
01:10:27.380 they'll be
01:10:27.760 fully
01:10:28.020 destroyed.
01:10:29.660 I think,
01:10:30.500 I think
01:10:30.860 they know
01:10:31.160 that.
01:10:31.980 So, all
01:10:32.740 they could
01:10:33.020 be getting
01:10:33.380 would be
01:10:33.840 some kind
01:10:34.280 of a,
01:10:34.660 you know,
01:10:35.880 some kind
01:10:36.220 of a
01:10:36.440 reprieve
01:10:36.860 for three
01:10:37.220 days,
01:10:37.800 and I
01:10:38.660 don't know,
01:10:38.820 it's probably
01:10:39.120 just to get
01:10:39.900 the leaders
01:10:40.340 out of the
01:10:40.740 tunnels.
01:10:42.020 So, I
01:10:42.820 would say no
01:10:43.260 to that if
01:10:43.660 I were
01:10:43.880 Israel.
01:10:44.280 We'll see
01:10:44.580 what happens.
01:10:45.520 And that,
01:10:46.000 ladies and
01:10:46.280 gentlemen,
01:10:46.640 is the
01:10:47.040 finest
01:10:47.320 live stream
01:10:48.040 you've
01:10:49.740 ever seen.
01:10:50.120 I'm going
01:10:51.640 to say
01:10:51.840 thank you
01:10:52.440 to the
01:10:53.000 YouTube
01:10:53.600 people.
01:10:57.400 I hear
01:10:58.120 that
01:10:58.520 Michigan
01:10:59.240 judge
01:10:59.680 just ruled
01:11:00.260 that Trump
01:11:00.660 is allowed
01:11:01.180 to be
01:11:01.500 on the
01:11:01.780 ballot.
01:11:02.640 Yeah,
01:11:02.880 the effort
01:11:03.680 to keep
01:11:04.240 Trump off
01:11:05.020 the ballot,
01:11:05.620 apparently
01:11:05.900 they're
01:11:06.200 failing.
01:11:10.580 And
01:11:11.100 all right,
01:11:15.840 apparently
01:11:16.380 they're
01:11:16.580 failing.
01:11:17.200 And that's
01:11:17.580 all for
01:11:17.880 today.
01:11:18.820 I will
01:11:19.180 talk to
01:11:19.640 you
01:11:19.940 later.
01:11:22.160 See you
01:11:22.540 YouTube.