Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2298 Scott Adams： CWSA 11⧸20⧸23 The Architecture Of Deceit (AOD), Is Both Busy & Crumbling

00:00:00.000 Do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do-do.

00:00:06.180 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to the highlight of human civilization.

00:00:11.880 Coffee with Scott Adams.

00:00:13.340 It will be the best thing you've ever had happen to you today and possibly in your entire life.

00:00:18.600 Maybe the history of the universe.

00:00:20.440 But if you'd like to take it up to levels even higher than that, yeah, I know, people think it's impossible, but it's not.

00:00:26.020 All you need is a cup or a mug or a glass, a tank or chalice or stein, a canteen jug or flask, a vessel of any kind.

00:00:32.820 Fill that vessel with your favorite beverage.

00:00:38.120 I like coffee.

00:00:41.000 I'll even put it on my microphone for you two.

00:00:44.480 And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine hit of the day.

00:00:47.980 The thing that makes everything better.

00:00:50.060 Simultaneous sip.

00:00:51.340 Go.

00:00:51.540 Ah, yeah, that was good stuff.

00:00:59.460 How's my sound now?

00:01:01.220 Amazing, right?

00:01:03.320 Your flask is your chalice today?

00:01:06.180 Yeah, that's a good reframe.

00:01:08.000 Today, my flask is my chalice.

00:01:11.480 As God is my witness, my flask is my chalice.

00:01:15.480 I don't know what it means, but it's kind of cool.

00:01:18.180 Well, I'm going to start with the important news and then work toward things that don't matter at all.

00:01:24.280 Important news.

00:01:25.780 An Alabama woman, this is on Fox News, an Alabama woman with two uteruses is pregnant with twins, one in each womb. 0.88

00:01:36.900 They say there's a one in 50 million chance that this could happen.

00:01:40.020 And, as usual, the important part of the story is completely left out.

00:01:46.420 You know what I'm talking about, right?

00:01:48.560 So a woman with two uteruses is pregnant and both uteruses with twins?

00:01:53.840 Raises a question, doesn't it?

00:01:57.920 Does her husband have two dicks? 0.99

00:02:02.120 I'm just wondering.

00:02:04.000 Like, how does it work, exactly?

00:02:08.000 Wrong question?

00:02:08.840 Wrong question?

00:02:10.020 Okay, well, maybe I don't know anything about anything and how this works at all.

00:02:15.380 But have you ever heard the saying?

00:02:19.280 This is a little country saying.

00:02:21.980 He was hornier than a two-peckered dog.

00:02:25.780 Has anybody ever heard that one?

00:02:28.040 Hornier than a two-peckered dog? 0.99

00:02:30.780 No?

00:02:31.700 Well, anyway.

00:02:33.940 Moving on.

00:02:34.760 Anyway, speaking of two dicks, the Tate brothers have weighed in on the ex-platform, and Andrew Tate says in a post,

00:02:47.640 yes, yes, if you're just figuring out the entire story about the Alabama woman,

00:02:53.000 it was nothing but a segue into the Tate brothers.

00:02:55.360 Yes, that's what it was.

00:02:57.380 There are no accidents.

00:03:01.920 Anyway, Andrew Tate says he'll spend a million dollars per month advertising X on X.

00:03:07.780 So just to support, so you know that Tim Poole said he would do a quarter million advertising on X to make up for the Apple and IBM and others pulling out.

00:03:18.000 And actually, Seth Dillon started that off, Babylon Bee, said they'd put a quarter million into extra advertising.

00:03:26.800 And then Andrew Tate, who's...

00:03:30.880 You know, no matter what you think of him, and I don't think much of him, you know, I just have personal issues with him,

00:03:39.060 but he is so good at inserting him into any news story.

00:03:43.520 And this is the classic.

00:03:46.840 He'll spend a million dollars per month advertising the X platform on X, you know, which has no value whatsoever.

00:03:53.780 And then he ends by telling Elon Musk, simply let me know where to pay.

00:04:02.980 Simply let me know where to pay.

00:04:06.920 Do you think there's any chance he's going to spend a million dollars per month

00:04:10.480 and the only obstacle is he just doesn't have the URL where to pay?

00:04:23.540 I'm sorry.

00:04:24.360 It's kind of brilliant.

00:04:29.800 It's just frankly brilliant.

00:04:31.720 It's so ridiculous.

00:04:33.300 It's ridiculous and exactly the right amount.

00:04:37.420 He is very good at this.

00:04:38.900 I'm going to give him that.

00:04:40.840 He's just very good at this.

00:04:44.240 Well, so if you didn't see it, there's a Photoshop picture of Ron DeSantis wearing thigh-high boots.

00:04:53.380 Did you all see that?

00:04:55.220 And Trump decided to make that part of his...

00:04:58.540 And he passed it around.

00:05:02.840 I've got to show you the picture because it doesn't sell...

00:05:06.040 The story doesn't sell itself without the picture.

00:05:08.900 But I was laughing for about 10 minutes.

00:05:12.740 All right.

00:05:14.180 So look at the picture first.

00:05:15.960 It's Ron DeSantis wearing nothing under his jacket but thigh-high boots.

00:05:24.360 It gets better.

00:05:29.920 The thing I love about it, the thing I love about it is that, you know, the world has got all these problems and wars and horrors and controversy.

00:05:42.440 But at the same time, as long as Trump doesn't say anything important and he just mocks his enemies, he's just sort of dancing to the presidency.

00:05:55.660 Let me give you two impressions of two candidates running for president.

00:06:00.780 All right.

00:06:01.000 First, Joe Biden.

00:06:13.240 Okay, that's Joe Biden running for president.

00:06:16.760 This is Trump with his current polling numbers.

00:06:20.500 So in a movie, if this were a movie, and someday it will be, this would be called the second act.

00:06:43.620 Now, in a movie, the second act is where the hero is just sort of surfing along, like getting stuff done, you know, heading toward a goal.

00:06:54.400 It's like, so if it were a movie, the good guy would, like, kill some bad guys, and then he'd immediately go kill some more bad guys.

00:07:02.500 And then, in a funny way, he'd kill some more bad guys.

00:07:06.140 That would be like the second act.

00:07:07.960 So this is Trump.

00:07:09.160 He just, he decides that he's going to talk about Adam Schiff being a pencil neck, and they don't know how he can hold up his fattigly face.

00:07:19.380 His fattigly head.

00:07:23.560 All right.

00:07:24.280 But it gets better.

00:07:25.080 So this is what Trump says when he passes along this picture of DeSantis.

00:07:32.500 He says, whoever photoshopped this image should be ashamed of themselves.

00:07:37.120 We do not condone editing a photo of Ron with pleather thigh-high boots.

00:07:41.880 Do not send this picture around.

00:07:46.000 Oh, my God.

00:07:49.020 He's winning so hard at the moment that he can just, like, kick back and have fun with it.

00:07:55.060 It's just kind of wonderful.

00:07:56.520 All right, but we'll, and by the way, the lesson of this is visual persuasion.

00:08:04.400 I tell you all the time that Trump is the king of visual persuasion.

00:08:10.480 You will never get that picture out of your head.

00:08:13.460 I mean, that picture is in your head to stay.

00:08:17.580 Oh, that's funny.

00:08:18.660 Well, I've taught you this lesson before, but it's going to be important in this next story.

00:08:25.160 So I'm going to remind you.

00:08:26.620 When I was in hypnosis class, my hypnosis teacher told us that when people make verbal slips,

00:08:34.500 you know, what you might call a Freudian slip, where it lets out their real feelings,

00:08:39.640 that it really is something.

00:08:43.580 That it really is telling you what they're actually thinking, but don't want to say it out loud.

00:08:46.980 Now, the example given was sort of a ridiculous one at the time.

00:08:53.860 The example given was that if you were, let's say, on a date with somebody

00:09:00.000 and you didn't know if they were really interested in you physically,

00:09:04.200 one of the things they might say as a verbal slip,

00:09:07.700 instead of saying that they're hungry, and they might say, I'm famished,

00:09:12.460 would be another way to say you're really hungry.

00:09:14.000 But they might have a Freudian slip and say, I'm ravished.

00:09:19.620 Right?

00:09:19.880 If a woman says, I'm ravished, in the context that you know she meant famished, 0.98

00:09:25.380 she's really telling you she wants to get ravished.

00:09:28.820 Right?

00:09:29.060 It's kind of a green light.

00:09:32.120 Now, when my hypnosis instructor said that, I said to myself, no.

00:09:38.160 No.

00:09:38.640 I feel like that's too clean of an example.

00:09:43.460 There's no way in the actual real world that somebody makes that specific kind of mistake.

00:09:49.760 Well, one day, I was invited to lunch by a co-worker.

00:09:54.800 A young woman who worked with me on a project, and I thought to myself,

00:09:59.100 huh, it's probably just lunch.

00:10:01.400 Or is she interested in me in that other way?

00:10:05.620 Or is it just lunch?

00:10:08.020 And I sat there at lunch, and then I watched her do something with her hands 0.99

00:10:12.080 that I've never seen anybody do in any context before.

00:10:16.360 Her one hand, she made like a circle, like the OK sign.

00:10:21.340 And with her other hand, instead of having her hands together, 1.00

00:10:24.620 you know when you put your elbows on a table,

00:10:26.740 and your hands are like in the prayer situation.

00:10:31.200 But instead of the prayer situation,

00:10:33.380 she was continually pushing her index finger of the other hand

00:10:36.560 through the hole that she made with her left hand. 0.51

00:10:39.700 She was literally fucking her hands while talking to me. 1.00

00:10:45.860 And before the meal came, she said,

00:10:49.820 and I swear to God, she said this,

00:10:52.340 I'm ravaged.

00:10:53.700 I'm ravished.

00:10:54.420 And I sat there, and I thought,

00:10:57.720 are you kidding?

00:10:59.700 Everything I learned in hypnosis class is literally true?

00:11:03.900 Like, I didn't think that was literal.

00:11:06.020 I thought it was just an easy example to make the point.

00:11:09.260 I didn't think anybody would really do that in the real world.

00:11:13.400 She and I were together for 15 years.

00:11:17.840 And did I know it was on when she took me to lunch?

00:11:21.360 I did when she said that.

00:11:22.500 And it was, you know, later I found out

00:11:24.940 it was exactly what she was thinking.

00:11:27.240 So keep that in mind,

00:11:29.640 that it's not just a funny story.

00:11:32.140 It's a real thing.

00:11:33.660 And you see it all the time.

00:11:35.620 And what the hypnotist learns

00:11:38.060 is that it's not just these real obvious examples like that.

00:11:42.340 It's all the time.

00:11:44.480 People will always choose a word

00:11:46.380 that reveals what they're really thinking

00:11:48.200 if they're talking quickly.

00:11:49.900 Now, this doesn't apply to a prepared speech.

00:11:52.980 A prepared speech,

00:11:53.960 you would make sure you got rid of all the little tells. 0.96

00:11:56.540 But if you're speaking off the cuff,

00:11:59.680 yeah, it comes out like crazy.

00:12:02.160 Now, Simon Atiba, a journalist,

00:12:05.760 was posting about Representative Dan Goldman,

00:12:13.300 who's running for the nomination against Biden.

00:12:17.740 And he was being interviewed by Jen Psaki.

00:12:21.980 And he was talking about Trump in January 6th

00:12:26.040 and, you know, blah, blah, blah, Trump is bad, Trump is bad.

00:12:29.760 And then he summarized the Trump is bad stuff by saying,

00:12:34.220 quote, Trump has to be eliminated.

00:12:38.080 He has to be eliminated.

00:12:41.000 Have you ever heard that phrase in politics before?

00:12:44.840 In American politics, has anybody ever said

00:12:47.740 that my opponent should be eliminated?

00:12:51.960 Let me tell you what that means.

00:12:59.360 Exactly what you think it does.

00:13:01.800 It means that at all costs, basically,

00:13:04.540 has to be eliminated, suggests it's an emergency.

00:13:09.220 And if any of the things that he says about Trump are true,

00:13:12.880 then you would expect that assassination would be on the table.

00:13:16.700 If any of the TDS that he believes about Trump were real,

00:13:21.940 you too would think, oh, he's Hiller.

00:13:24.660 We've got to, you know, he must be stopped at all expense.

00:13:29.080 So we all know what that means.

00:13:32.480 And you can completely understand how we got here.

00:13:35.800 Now, by the way, if you asked him, does he mean that,

00:13:38.040 he would obviously say no.

00:13:40.220 But it's a very clear tell of inner thoughts.

00:13:45.860 Now, you're going to say to me,

00:13:47.560 I was waiting for somebody to say it,

00:13:48.840 but you haven't said it yet,

00:13:50.180 Scott, you can't read minds.

00:13:53.480 No, you can't read minds when it's in the mind.

00:13:57.620 As long as it's still inside the mind,

00:13:59.500 you can't see it at all.

00:14:01.100 When you do these verbal slips,

00:14:04.600 that's when what's inside your mind

00:14:06.200 literally becomes a signal outside your mind.

00:14:08.940 Now, that doesn't mean it's 100%.

00:14:10.540 There's nothing that's 100%.

00:14:12.500 But this specific one,

00:14:15.640 just like I'm ravished,

00:14:18.540 is about as specific as you can get.

00:14:22.440 Right?

00:14:22.840 I would be amazed if this doesn't mean

00:14:25.020 exactly what he thinks it does.

00:14:26.820 Now, I don't think that he thinks

00:14:28.180 it would come to, you know, physical violence.

00:14:32.080 Like, I'm sure he assumes that, you know,

00:14:33.900 there's plenty of alternatives,

00:14:36.080 you know, without getting there,

00:14:36.960 you just have to get there.

00:14:38.160 So I'm sure that's what he'd say.

00:14:40.420 But this choice of words suggests

00:14:42.140 that there might not be a limit

00:14:44.560 to what would be appropriate

00:14:46.500 to keep him out of office.

00:14:48.800 And believe me,

00:14:49.860 if I believed the things that Democrats say about Trump,

00:14:53.100 that he's literally a dictator and Hitler 0.92

00:14:55.040 and trying to take over the country

00:14:56.560 and he'll never leave office,

00:14:57.680 if I believed any of that,

00:14:59.940 I'd probably be thinking privately,

00:15:02.500 I wouldn't tell anybody,

00:15:04.380 but privately I'd be thinking,

00:15:05.740 you know, if something happened to him,

00:15:09.160 it wouldn't be so bad, you know.

00:15:12.380 So that's what I think is going on.

00:15:14.140 Of course, nobody can read minds,

00:15:15.940 you can't be 100% certain,

00:15:17.680 but boy, does it look exactly like what it looks like.

00:15:21.700 All right.

00:15:26.160 Argentina's got a new president,

00:15:28.700 Javier Milet, I guess.

00:15:31.040 And yesterday when I was doing a live stream

00:15:35.080 from my man cave,

00:15:37.000 people were pouring in all excited about him.

00:15:39.320 I didn't know who the hell he was.

00:15:41.440 So I had to do a quick little look up.

00:15:43.760 I guess Tucker interviewed him.

00:15:46.100 So that made him known to a lot of people,

00:15:48.800 at least on the right.

00:15:50.180 And he's a libertarian,

00:15:52.640 and he hates wokeness,

00:15:54.380 doesn't like wokeness,

00:15:55.900 doesn't like the Iranian influence in his country,

00:15:58.200 is apparently very pro-Israel,

00:16:02.360 more anti-Iranian than pro-Israel, I think,

00:16:05.460 but pro-Israel.

00:16:06.260 He was there flying, you know,

00:16:07.540 waving the flag,

00:16:08.560 and it wasn't entirely popular.

00:16:11.240 So he's anti-abortion, anti-woke,

00:16:14.980 but libertarian,

00:16:16.800 not right-leaning, per se.

00:16:21.120 I guess he was,

00:16:22.360 and he's just an exciting character,

00:16:23.800 and he wants to get rid of useless parts of the government.

00:16:26.800 And so people are saying,

00:16:28.720 hey, is this Argentina sort of leading the way?

00:16:32.360 You know, is there something happening

00:16:34.000 where, you know,

00:16:36.240 Trump is doing well in the polls,

00:16:38.000 and, you know, this guy wins in Argentina?

00:16:41.320 Are we seeing some kind of a repeat of 2016

00:16:43.860 where there's Brexit,

00:16:45.440 and then there's Trump,

00:16:47.020 and then there were some other leaders in his likeness?

00:16:51.420 Maybe.

00:16:52.280 I mean, everything's a pendulum, right?

00:16:53.820 The pendulum only goes so far before it swings back.

00:16:57.520 Well, I believe that's exactly what's happening.

00:17:00.920 The pendulum is starting its very clear swing back.

00:17:06.640 There's a story in Fox News

00:17:08.940 that Obama, they say,

00:17:12.200 showed little public support for Biden

00:17:13.780 at some recent event.

00:17:16.460 So what does that mean,

00:17:18.260 for Obama showing little public support?

00:17:20.480 That's kind of subjective, isn't it?

00:17:23.520 So if you're a consumer of news,

00:17:26.680 and you're looking at Fox News,

00:17:28.100 and Fox News says that they would frame it this way,

00:17:31.200 Obama showed little public support for Biden,

00:17:33.500 it could be entirely true.

00:17:36.080 But I would ask you to remember

00:17:38.060 this is Fox News

00:17:39.340 giving you a subjective impression of Obama.

00:17:43.580 You know, you've got to put that in context.

00:17:48.720 But whether or not they accurately

00:17:53.420 saw that situation,

00:17:56.200 I suspect that they did.

00:17:58.020 Because if Obama had gone full Biden,

00:18:00.740 that would have been a news story itself, wouldn't it?

00:18:03.920 If Obama had given, like,

00:18:06.240 a full-throated Biden endorsement,

00:18:09.420 that would look weird,

00:18:10.640 because, you know, Axelrod,

00:18:13.520 who looks like Obama's henchman,

00:18:15.720 you know, they're pretty close.

00:18:17.380 You know, Axelrod's sending out the signal,

00:18:19.920 you know, maybe age,

00:18:22.400 maybe a little too old, you know.

00:18:24.700 So it would be surprising

00:18:26.580 if Obama gave him full-throated support.

00:18:31.420 But at this point,

00:18:33.460 I think my hypothesis is looking very strong,

00:18:37.840 and it looks like this,

00:18:38.680 that nobody on the Democrat side,

00:18:42.120 including the Bidens themselves,

00:18:44.640 including Jill, Joe, Hunter,

00:18:46.640 all the Bidens,

00:18:47.660 that all of them are the same opinion,

00:18:49.960 that Joe should not run.

00:18:52.640 I believe even the Bidens agree.

00:18:55.620 But the Bidens specifically have a problem

00:18:58.980 of staying in a jail.

00:19:01.400 And I believe that Joe is holding on

00:19:03.620 so he can protect himself

00:19:05.000 and protect Hunter,

00:19:06.380 especially maybe his brother.

00:19:07.580 Yeah, full-throated, Flynn.

00:19:11.900 And it seems to me

00:19:15.060 that it's obvious now.

00:19:17.420 Would you agree?

00:19:19.280 Because Biden is not the one

00:19:21.220 who bucks the Democrat majority.

00:19:26.420 He's the one who's most identified

00:19:29.300 as being their person,

00:19:31.180 like he's the most kept animal

00:19:32.840 within the entire kennel.

00:19:34.360 So if he's not doing

00:19:36.860 what everybody else wants,

00:19:39.240 including Obama,

00:19:40.900 including David Axelrod,

00:19:42.640 there's something going on

00:19:44.060 that has nothing to do with politics.

00:19:45.920 Would you agree?

00:19:47.540 That whatever the reason is

00:19:49.120 that there's this disagreement

00:19:50.300 between Biden wanting to run

00:19:51.980 and everybody else wanting him not to

00:19:53.820 on his own team,

00:19:54.780 it has to be something personal.

00:19:57.220 And you could imagine

00:20:00.540 it's just old man

00:20:02.000 doesn't want to change his mind,

00:20:03.740 but I don't think so.

00:20:05.540 It doesn't have that feel to it,

00:20:06.820 does it?

00:20:07.640 Because he's not giving off

00:20:09.200 that vibe of old man

00:20:10.540 can't change his mind.

00:20:12.140 He does still look like

00:20:13.280 he's mentally flexible,

00:20:15.040 even within his current

00:20:17.060 state of degradation.

00:20:18.260 He does still seem flexible.

00:20:21.420 He's not the old man 0.56

00:20:23.120 yells at the sky,

00:20:24.200 I won't change my mind

00:20:25.180 no matter what your facts are.

00:20:26.940 He's not really that guy.

00:20:28.840 So it looks like he just has

00:20:30.540 a real personal problem

00:20:32.060 that's at odds.

00:20:35.460 Now, here's the correct comment

00:20:37.860 from Uphill Gardner

00:20:39.200 in all caps.

00:20:40.560 Scott is mind-reading again.

00:20:42.780 Now, I'm calling that out myself.

00:20:45.120 I'm not saying I can see

00:20:46.280 what he's thinking.

00:20:47.480 I'm saying that the external 0.77

00:20:49.020 signals are narrowing down

00:20:52.040 the hypotheses.

00:20:54.600 The hypothesis that Biden thinks

00:20:57.240 that running would be good

00:20:58.440 for the world,

00:20:59.620 I think is eliminated

00:21:00.640 because his team isn't supporting

00:21:02.980 the idea that him running

00:21:04.180 is good for the world.

00:21:05.980 I don't think that's his reason.

00:21:08.180 So again, we can't read his mind

00:21:09.820 and that was exactly

00:21:11.180 the right comment.

00:21:12.420 That's the kind of comment

00:21:13.420 I appreciate

00:21:13.960 because you should definitely

00:21:15.600 call me out

00:21:16.440 if you think I'm reading

00:21:18.200 somebody's mind

00:21:18.980 because I do that all the time

00:21:20.420 and it's a very good discipline.

00:21:22.580 Now, so I think I supported it

00:21:24.040 by saying there are external signals

00:21:25.660 and you can't know for sure.

00:21:28.800 All right.

00:21:30.540 My theme today continues to be

00:21:32.740 the architecture of deceit

00:21:34.400 is crumbling.

00:21:35.800 The architecture of deceit

00:21:37.380 would be all the entities

00:21:39.700 that are funded by Democrats

00:21:42.800 and Soros and the government

00:21:44.260 and the news media

00:21:45.640 that's working with them

00:21:46.520 and the intel agencies

00:21:47.820 that are working with the Democrats

00:21:49.300 and with the news media

00:21:50.360 and that collectively,

00:21:52.900 you know,

00:21:53.700 they build this story or narrative

00:21:56.480 and the narrative built

00:21:59.060 by this complex

00:22:00.440 or what I call

00:22:01.320 the architecture of deceit,

00:22:03.040 the AOD,

00:22:04.520 is starting to come apart.

00:22:07.700 So a number of stories

00:22:10.300 that I'm going to tell

00:22:10.980 going forward

00:22:11.780 in today

00:22:12.740 are going to have

00:22:13.980 that same character to them

00:22:15.820 where you can see

00:22:16.760 the narrative start

00:22:17.540 to come apart.

00:22:18.920 Number one,

00:22:20.540 Eric Adams,

00:22:22.040 mayor of New York,

00:22:23.920 who I got to say,

00:22:25.380 I'm just starting

00:22:26.020 to love that guy.

00:22:27.200 Is anybody else

00:22:27.780 having the same reaction?

00:22:29.340 He's a Democrat,

00:22:29.980 but there's something

00:22:32.480 about him

00:22:33.240 that's right.

00:22:36.560 I don't know how to,

00:22:38.660 I don't know exactly

00:22:39.600 how to say this,

00:22:41.020 but there's something

00:22:41.700 about him that's right.

00:22:43.780 Now,

00:22:44.200 he's a Democrat.

00:22:45.140 I know a lot of you

00:22:46.020 don't like him.

00:22:47.640 You're going to say

00:22:48.220 he's woke and blah, blah,

00:22:49.540 but let me make my case.

00:22:51.880 Hold on a second.

00:22:52.880 Hold your judgment.

00:22:53.660 Just let me make my case.

00:22:54.680 So as you know,

00:22:57.540 he's been a proponent

00:22:59.200 of do something

00:23:01.480 about immigration

00:23:02.260 and he seems to be

00:23:03.340 a convert

00:23:03.840 to the idea

00:23:05.380 that you can't

00:23:06.280 just ship them

00:23:06.780 into a city

00:23:07.360 and let them

00:23:08.640 do whatever they want.

00:23:10.220 So his reaction to it

00:23:11.800 is he's announced

00:23:12.640 in order to pay

00:23:13.440 for all these people

00:23:14.520 that are in New York City,

00:23:16.160 he will cut funding

00:23:18.340 quite a bit

00:23:19.380 to schools,

00:23:21.120 sanitation,

00:23:22.080 police,

00:23:22.540 and libraries.

00:23:24.680 Now,

00:23:25.520 here's what I think.

00:23:27.400 I think Eric Adams

00:23:29.500 is aggressively

00:23:30.920 following the Democrat plan.

00:23:35.240 I believe

00:23:36.280 he is embracing

00:23:38.100 and amplifying

00:23:39.260 something he knows

00:23:40.380 he has to break.

00:23:42.580 And so he's,

00:23:43.540 instead of fighting it

00:23:44.660 as in,

00:23:45.040 hey,

00:23:45.200 you've got to give us money

00:23:46.120 or, hey,

00:23:47.060 you have to fix the border,

00:23:48.520 he's embracing it

00:23:49.680 saying,

00:23:50.300 yeah,

00:23:50.500 well,

00:23:50.740 of course,

00:23:51.280 we're a sanctuary city

00:23:52.260 and,

00:23:53.400 of course,

00:23:54.300 we're going to pay for it

00:23:55.180 because that's what

00:23:55.600 we said we'd do.

00:23:56.920 And,

00:23:57.240 of course,

00:23:57.600 we'll take sacrifices.

00:23:59.180 The people who live here

00:24:00.020 will take sacrifices

00:24:01.000 because that's what

00:24:02.320 we said we'd do.

00:24:03.740 That's the plan.

00:24:05.500 I'm agreeing with you Democrats.

00:24:07.320 Let's do this.

00:24:08.540 Let's get rid of those police. 0.86

00:24:09.940 Remember,

00:24:10.280 you wanted to do that,

00:24:11.040 right?

00:24:11.600 You wanted to get rid

00:24:12.440 of police.

00:24:13.520 And what about

00:24:14.220 that education?

00:24:15.120 Well,

00:24:15.700 you know,

00:24:15.940 we'd love to have schools

00:24:17.000 and libraries

00:24:17.620 and sanitation.

00:24:19.040 We'd love it.

00:24:19.660 But,

00:24:20.400 you know,

00:24:20.820 we're not those people.

00:24:22.180 We're not the cruel people

00:24:23.340 who would kick immigrants out.

00:24:24.800 So we're going to take

00:24:25.540 a little from ourselves

00:24:27.020 and we're going to do it

00:24:28.880 overtly

00:24:29.520 and so that we can help

00:24:31.040 this group of people.

00:24:33.320 How do you think

00:24:34.040 that's going over?

00:24:36.240 Well,

00:24:37.340 Cardi B has a video

00:24:38.820 out today

00:24:39.460 in which she's

00:24:40.160 talking to the public

00:24:41.500 and she is pissed.

00:24:43.540 So Cardi B,

00:24:46.140 who I don't think

00:24:47.040 has been identified

00:24:48.260 with any right-leaning

00:24:49.620 politics before,

00:24:51.400 is just saying,

00:24:52.460 what the hell

00:24:53.420 are you doing

00:24:54.780 letting in

00:24:55.980 all these immigrants

00:24:56.840 and cutting

00:24:58.260 all these valuable services?

00:25:01.440 Now,

00:25:02.020 you saw that

00:25:02.540 Michael Rapoport,

00:25:03.760 actor who is

00:25:04.620 super anti-Trump,

00:25:06.860 has come out

00:25:07.780 and said in public,

00:25:08.680 well,

00:25:09.080 maybe I was totally wrong

00:25:10.560 and he's thinking

00:25:11.880 about voting for Trump.

00:25:13.540 Now,

00:25:15.260 Cardi B,

00:25:17.060 coming from

00:25:17.900 a demographic

00:25:18.960 of the public

00:25:20.280 that is most,

00:25:22.500 traditionally,

00:25:23.560 most opposed

00:25:24.500 to Trump

00:25:25.240 and she's just

00:25:26.380 saying flat out,

00:25:28.380 this Democrat stuff

00:25:29.360 is crazy.

00:25:31.020 Basically,

00:25:31.780 it doesn't make sense,

00:25:33.300 these are my words,

00:25:34.280 not hers,

00:25:35.060 but the current situation

00:25:36.880 doesn't make sense

00:25:37.760 by anybody's

00:25:38.920 political preferences.

00:25:41.460 It doesn't make sense.

00:25:42.640 It just doesn't add up.

00:25:43.540 So,

00:25:46.100 example number one

00:25:47.520 of the

00:25:49.220 architecture of deceit

00:25:51.760 crumbling,

00:25:53.300 and it goes like this.

00:25:55.160 Eric Adams,

00:25:56.080 I believe cleverly,

00:25:58.420 said,

00:25:58.800 I believe this is

00:25:59.580 his actual plan.

00:26:01.140 Now,

00:26:01.320 I don't know this,

00:26:02.080 so if he said

00:26:02.600 you're mind-reading,

00:26:03.380 you'd be right

00:26:03.880 on this one.

00:26:04.880 So this is speculative.

00:26:06.360 I believe that

00:26:07.180 what he's doing

00:26:07.880 is trying to teach

00:26:09.580 Democrats

00:26:10.220 the following thing.

00:26:11.320 money doesn't appear

00:26:14.040 because you want it.

00:26:16.160 The money you have

00:26:17.260 is the money you have

00:26:18.100 most of the time,

00:26:19.040 and if you're going to

00:26:19.900 decide to give a lot of it

00:26:20.980 to someone else,

00:26:22.200 you're going to have less.

00:26:23.700 And I think he's making

00:26:26.020 Democrats understand,

00:26:28.840 you get that this isn't free,

00:26:30.980 that you specifically

00:26:32.220 are going to have less.

00:26:33.660 You're giving your stuff

00:26:34.860 to these people,

00:26:36.140 these people being immigrants,

00:26:37.700 who are lovely people,

00:26:38.920 I'm sure,

00:26:39.140 but it has to do

00:26:40.920 with the system

00:26:41.480 and integrity of the system,

00:26:42.700 not the people.

00:26:46.460 So I think Eric Adams

00:26:47.740 is doing a real solid

00:26:49.680 by making it clear

00:26:51.800 that you have to choose.

00:26:53.760 Have you ever heard me say

00:26:55.080 that Democrats

00:26:56.100 have what I call

00:26:57.600 half-opinions?

00:26:59.460 It's not a real opinion.

00:27:01.740 An opinion would include

00:27:03.120 the good and the bad

00:27:04.340 of any decision.

00:27:05.700 Well,

00:27:06.040 I've considered

00:27:06.600 all the downside,

00:27:07.400 but you have to look

00:27:08.760 at the upside.

00:27:09.660 I decided the upside

00:27:10.740 is more than enough

00:27:12.220 to compensate

00:27:12.720 for the downside.

00:27:13.880 That would be an opinion.

00:27:16.120 A half-pinion

00:27:17.000 would be sanctuary cities.

00:27:20.160 That's a half-pinion

00:27:21.240 because it doesn't consider

00:27:23.000 what happens

00:27:24.040 to the people

00:27:24.500 who are already living there.

00:27:26.340 So Eric Adams

00:27:27.200 turned their half-pinion

00:27:28.560 into a full opinion

00:27:30.120 and now they're going

00:27:31.320 to have to deal with it

00:27:32.760 as a full opinion

00:27:33.660 because he made it real.

00:27:35.540 He didn't just talk about it.

00:27:36.680 He made it real.

00:27:38.860 You know that cop

00:27:39.640 in the corner?

00:27:40.360 Gone.

00:27:41.500 You know those

00:27:42.200 teacher raises?

00:27:43.700 Gone.

00:27:44.600 You know those books

00:27:45.340 you want to check

00:27:45.960 out of the library?

00:27:46.780 Gone.

00:27:47.660 See that garbage

00:27:48.560 that's sitting

00:27:49.060 on the sidewalk?

00:27:50.780 That's what you wanted.

00:27:52.100 I mean, indirectly.

00:27:53.940 So that's a little

00:27:55.100 crumbling

00:27:56.940 of the architecture

00:27:57.960 of deceit.

00:28:00.440 I saw a post.

00:28:03.580 I think it's real,

00:28:04.580 but maybe not

00:28:06.280 only because the name

00:28:07.580 of the person

00:28:08.100 posting it was

00:28:09.000 Dr. Charlotte Proudman.

00:28:12.040 Now maybe that's

00:28:12.780 just a real name,

00:28:13.680 Proudman,

00:28:14.920 but spelled like

00:28:15.700 a proud man.

00:28:16.980 Anyway, Dr. Charlotte

00:28:18.060 says,

00:28:19.400 Whenever I lack

00:28:20.240 self-confidence,

00:28:21.600 I just ask myself,

00:28:23.120 what would a white 0.79

00:28:23.900 privileged man do?

00:28:25.500 And then I have

00:28:26.240 my answer.

00:28:28.400 Let me read it again.

00:28:29.600 Whenever I lack

00:28:31.620 self-confidence,

00:28:33.020 I just ask myself,

00:28:34.280 what would a white 0.79

00:28:35.040 privileged man do?

00:28:36.500 And then I have

00:28:37.180 my answer.

00:28:39.300 Well, as the

00:28:40.580 Prince of Fakes account

00:28:42.000 who pointed this out

00:28:43.760 notes,

00:28:45.300 quote,

00:28:45.860 she's one reframe

00:28:47.020 away from success.

00:28:49.960 She's one reframe

00:28:51.240 away from success.

00:28:52.400 Because you know

00:28:52.980 what would be

00:28:53.320 the best advice

00:28:54.460 I could ever give

00:28:55.180 anybody?

00:28:56.560 That you couldn't

00:28:57.480 get better advice

00:28:58.260 than this.

00:29:00.480 Look at what

00:29:01.300 a self-confident

00:29:02.440 white privileged

00:29:03.360 man does

00:29:04.140 and then do that.

00:29:07.820 Because if you

00:29:08.640 just did what

00:29:09.300 somebody who

00:29:09.920 expected success

00:29:11.340 does,

00:29:13.260 somebody who

00:29:14.000 expects it,

00:29:15.080 I expect success.

00:29:16.720 So I'm going

00:29:17.100 to act that way.

00:29:18.500 That would be

00:29:19.320 a really,

00:29:20.300 really good way

00:29:20.940 to act.

00:29:22.180 So,

00:29:22.780 I feel like

00:29:24.280 she was so close.

00:29:27.240 So close.

00:29:28.260 to understanding

00:29:29.740 what's going on.

00:29:31.600 That, yeah,

00:29:32.240 if you act like

00:29:33.180 success is owed

00:29:36.000 to you,

00:29:37.020 but you still do

00:29:37.760 all the right

00:29:38.140 things to get

00:29:38.700 success,

00:29:39.600 and you act

00:29:40.080 confident on

00:29:41.260 your pursuit

00:29:41.940 of it,

00:29:42.860 yeah,

00:29:43.160 that's just about

00:29:43.900 the best advice

00:29:44.780 I could ever

00:29:45.300 give anybody.

00:29:46.440 So yeah,

00:29:47.020 do that.

00:29:49.940 All right,

00:29:50.480 here's some

00:29:50.820 context for you

00:29:51.660 on the architecture

00:29:52.400 of deceit.

00:29:53.360 I saw this

00:29:53.820 from a Benjamin

00:29:54.700 Carlson post

00:29:55.780 on X.

00:29:57.760 He talks about

00:29:58.700 a 1980s interview

00:30:00.020 when he shows

00:30:00.520 the video

00:30:00.900 of journalist

00:30:01.940 Louis Wolfe

00:30:02.540 and ex-CIA

00:30:03.380 agent John

00:30:06.060 Stockwell.

00:30:07.760 And this is

00:30:08.340 a story that

00:30:08.960 the journalist

00:30:09.520 and the

00:30:10.260 ex-CIA guy

00:30:11.880 says.

00:30:13.060 It was

00:30:13.600 talking about

00:30:14.020 the media,

00:30:15.480 the CIA

00:30:16.040 manipulating the

00:30:18.060 media in the

00:30:18.760 United States.

00:30:19.320 and one of

00:30:20.820 the things

00:30:21.080 that he said

00:30:21.540 in the interview

00:30:22.020 is,

00:30:22.720 you know,

00:30:22.920 he was asked

00:30:23.400 how far

00:30:23.840 does it go

00:30:24.380 and he talked

00:30:25.700 about the

00:30:26.320 CIA delivering

00:30:27.380 literally packages

00:30:28.880 that the news

00:30:29.620 would just run.

00:30:31.080 They would actually

00:30:31.580 give them the

00:30:32.180 video,

00:30:33.300 give them the

00:30:33.800 story,

00:30:34.460 and the news

00:30:34.980 would just run it.

00:30:36.640 It was just

00:30:37.020 the CIA.

00:30:38.580 And apparently

00:30:39.100 that was widespread

00:30:39.960 but here's what

00:30:40.900 the ex-CIA

00:30:42.180 agent said

00:30:42.980 back then.

00:30:44.600 He says,

00:30:45.160 it goes beyond

00:30:45.860 your wildest

00:30:46.640 imagination,

00:30:47.340 the extent

00:30:48.120 to which

00:30:48.460 the CIA

00:30:49.020 has gone

00:30:49.540 to manipulate

00:30:50.280 public opinion.

00:30:51.980 And it talked

00:30:52.540 about setting

00:30:53.580 up all kinds

00:30:54.200 of fake

00:30:54.700 organizations

00:30:55.440 and funding

00:30:56.240 all kinds

00:30:56.660 of fake

00:30:57.000 things and

00:30:57.580 having all

00:30:57.960 kinds of

00:30:58.560 ties to

00:30:59.320 reporters

00:30:59.900 and the

00:31:00.420 media and

00:31:00.880 all that.

00:31:05.160 Anyway,

00:31:07.220 so we have

00:31:09.140 an eyewitness

00:31:11.000 of somebody

00:31:12.180 who was

00:31:12.440 involved in it.

00:31:13.560 But this

00:31:14.000 comes from

00:31:14.640 the 80s,

00:31:16.320 in the 80s.

00:31:17.340 What was

00:31:19.640 it that

00:31:20.000 stopped the

00:31:20.580 CIA from

00:31:21.280 doing all

00:31:21.800 that stuff

00:31:22.400 between the

00:31:24.440 80s and

00:31:25.000 now?

00:31:26.840 Nothing.

00:31:28.120 Nothing

00:31:28.460 stopped it.

00:31:30.020 Why would

00:31:30.860 they?

00:31:32.320 Why would

00:31:32.880 they?

00:31:34.180 So if you

00:31:34.960 look at your

00:31:35.580 architecture of

00:31:37.100 deceit,

00:31:38.100 how much of

00:31:39.160 that is from

00:31:39.620 the CIA?

00:31:40.880 Probably a

00:31:41.620 lot.

00:31:42.920 A lot.

00:31:44.080 Yeah.

00:31:44.420 The CIA is

00:31:45.600 an expert in

00:31:46.880 setting up a

00:31:48.060 bunch of

00:31:48.520 fake

00:31:48.860 organizations so

00:31:50.700 that one

00:31:51.080 organization can

00:31:52.080 support the

00:31:52.680 other one.

00:31:53.900 So in other

00:31:54.280 words, the

00:31:54.720 news, if it

00:31:55.520 wants to run

00:31:55.900 a story, can

00:31:57.160 say, hey,

00:31:57.840 fake organization,

00:31:59.620 say what's

00:32:00.180 true and

00:32:00.520 what's not,

00:32:01.040 and then they

00:32:01.400 report it, but

00:32:02.640 really they were

00:32:03.200 both fakes.

00:32:04.760 But one fake

00:32:05.580 uses the other

00:32:06.220 one as their

00:32:06.920 source like it's

00:32:09.500 a real thing.

00:32:10.040 So do you

00:32:13.840 think that

00:32:14.160 that stopped?

00:32:16.000 Do you

00:32:16.860 think the

00:32:17.280 CIA just

00:32:17.880 stopped doing

00:32:18.320 that?

00:32:19.940 No.

00:32:21.900 No.

00:32:22.820 Of course

00:32:23.320 not.

00:32:24.200 Now once you

00:32:24.840 understand that,

00:32:27.200 the architecture

00:32:28.420 of deceit

00:32:29.460 starts to come

00:32:30.900 into focus.

00:32:32.720 And you start

00:32:33.280 seeing organizations

00:32:34.320 that have been,

00:32:35.940 let's say,

00:32:36.400 very anti-Republican

00:32:37.040 in their

00:32:38.880 approach, even

00:32:40.060 if that's not

00:32:40.700 the name on

00:32:41.800 the organization,

00:32:42.740 if it's not

00:32:43.160 part of their

00:32:43.620 charter, but

00:32:44.180 they seem just

00:32:44.820 very targeted

00:32:45.620 at Republicans.

00:32:49.000 Coincidence?

00:32:50.340 Probably not.

00:32:51.500 Probably not.

00:32:53.000 All right,

00:32:53.700 here's another

00:32:54.200 thing that makes

00:32:54.760 you raise your

00:32:55.380 eyebrows.

00:32:55.960 So also

00:32:56.960 speaking about

00:32:57.640 the Argentina

00:32:58.720 election, I

00:33:00.560 saw a post on

00:33:02.020 the End

00:33:02.540 Wokeness

00:33:03.160 account, which

00:33:05.620 is a real

00:33:05.940 good, fun

00:33:06.680 account to

00:33:07.480 follow,

00:33:08.000 End

00:33:08.180 Wokeness.

00:33:10.240 Argentina

00:33:10.720 had up to

00:33:12.140 30 million

00:33:12.820 paper ballots,

00:33:14.280 and they

00:33:15.080 counted them

00:33:15.560 in one day

00:33:16.000 and gave

00:33:16.280 the result.

00:33:18.840 30 million

00:33:19.700 ballots, they

00:33:20.700 just counted

00:33:21.200 them up and

00:33:21.620 gave you the

00:33:21.920 result.

00:33:23.760 Now,

00:33:24.560 Maricopa

00:33:25.160 had only

00:33:25.680 1.9 million

00:33:26.640 ballots,

00:33:27.180 Milwaukee

00:33:27.600 less than

00:33:29.060 half a

00:33:29.420 million,

00:33:30.360 Detroit

00:33:30.800 quarter million,

00:33:32.260 and Fulton

00:33:32.780 about half a

00:33:33.400 million.

00:33:34.500 But Argentina

00:33:35.200 had up to

00:33:36.400 30 million

00:33:37.020 ballots,

00:33:39.240 counted them

00:33:39.780 all up,

00:33:40.120 no problem.

00:33:41.600 But we

00:33:42.200 couldn't get

00:33:42.540 that done

00:33:42.900 in the

00:33:43.060 United States.

00:33:44.180 But I

00:33:44.740 have a

00:33:44.960 bigger question.

00:33:47.000 I believe

00:33:47.800 every expert

00:33:48.880 would agree

00:33:49.460 with the

00:33:49.800 following

00:33:50.140 statement.

00:33:50.980 Can you

00:33:51.260 give me a

00:33:51.600 fact check

00:33:52.000 on this?

00:33:52.660 Fact check.

00:33:54.020 Every expert

00:33:54.820 in elections

00:33:55.640 would say

00:33:57.040 that paper

00:33:57.640 ballots and

00:33:59.040 multiple people

00:33:59.940 watching them

00:34:00.480 being counted

00:34:01.080 and counting

00:34:02.220 them the same

00:34:02.700 day is the

00:34:04.280 best system.

00:34:05.120 Am I

00:34:05.340 wrong about

00:34:05.740 that?

00:34:06.840 Because you

00:34:07.600 never quite

00:34:08.160 know if the

00:34:08.860 machines will

00:34:09.460 work and

00:34:10.380 everybody would

00:34:11.040 have questions

00:34:11.620 about them

00:34:12.120 anyway.

00:34:12.940 It might be a

00:34:13.540 little harder

00:34:13.920 to audit because

00:34:15.280 you can't see

00:34:15.740 the code.

00:34:17.640 But you can

00:34:18.300 always see the

00:34:18.800 ballot.

00:34:20.840 So here's my

00:34:22.440 question.

00:34:23.660 Why do you

00:34:24.140 think the United

00:34:24.700 States has

00:34:25.400 machines when

00:34:28.020 there's probably

00:34:28.720 no expert who

00:34:29.520 thinks it's the

00:34:30.060 best way?

00:34:30.460 I can only

00:34:32.880 think of one

00:34:33.340 reason.

00:34:34.940 I think you're

00:34:35.980 seeing it with

00:34:36.380 your own eyes.

00:34:38.900 Or on

00:34:39.480 YouTube, you're

00:34:40.060 seeing this

00:34:40.400 yourself, right?

00:34:42.720 Now, have you

00:34:43.320 noticed that the

00:34:43.880 other times I've

00:34:44.560 glitched it was

00:34:45.160 the same topic?

00:34:47.200 Has anybody

00:34:47.600 noticed that?

00:34:49.120 It's always

00:34:50.060 election integrity

00:34:51.120 and YouTube

00:34:52.640 glitches.

00:34:54.620 You just

00:34:55.420 watched this with

00:34:56.080 your own eyes

00:34:56.780 and how many

00:34:57.320 times have you

00:34:57.820 seen it now?

00:34:58.380 You tell me

00:35:00.280 on YouTube,

00:35:01.080 if you watch

00:35:01.800 me regularly,

00:35:02.880 have you seen

00:35:03.460 a glitch on

00:35:04.060 this topic at

00:35:05.760 least three

00:35:06.160 times, three

00:35:07.020 different days?

00:35:08.460 I think I've

00:35:09.360 seen it at

00:35:09.820 least three

00:35:10.360 times.

00:35:13.900 Yeah, I'm

00:35:14.600 seeing some

00:35:15.120 yeses.

00:35:16.100 At least three

00:35:16.760 times on the

00:35:17.380 same topic.

00:35:19.260 You think

00:35:19.620 that's a

00:35:20.000 coincidence?

00:35:22.680 It'd be a

00:35:23.280 big coincidence,

00:35:24.080 wouldn't it?

00:35:26.060 The level of

00:35:27.760 obviousness now?

00:35:29.720 So this is

00:35:30.420 another example.

00:35:31.840 I don't know

00:35:32.460 that that wasn't

00:35:33.100 a coincidence,

00:35:34.600 but when you

00:35:35.200 look at it in

00:35:35.800 context, it's

00:35:36.740 hard to believe

00:35:37.300 it.

00:35:38.860 And you know

00:35:39.940 that my traffic

00:35:41.820 is kind of

00:35:42.740 flatlined for

00:35:43.480 years on

00:35:44.000 YouTube, where

00:35:45.180 everything else I

00:35:46.040 do is going

00:35:46.560 up.

00:35:47.760 YouTube,

00:35:48.360 flat.

00:35:50.840 Yeah, I'm

00:35:51.440 sure that's

00:35:51.820 organic.

00:35:52.260 anyway, my

00:35:57.740 assumption is,

00:35:58.640 my working

00:35:59.220 assumption is,

00:36:01.160 remember, the

00:36:01.920 working assumption

00:36:02.560 in general is

00:36:04.180 that citizens of

00:36:06.120 the United States

00:36:07.300 and I would say

00:36:07.960 everywhere else as

00:36:08.700 well, are

00:36:09.360 innocent until

00:36:10.060 proven guilty.

00:36:11.800 That has to be

00:36:12.940 your standard.

00:36:14.980 A citizen is

00:36:15.760 innocent until

00:36:16.380 proven guilty.

00:36:17.340 But you should

00:36:18.080 not use that

00:36:18.720 standard for the

00:36:19.500 government.

00:36:19.860 government, if

00:36:20.600 you're talking

00:36:20.900 about the

00:36:21.300 entity, not

00:36:22.080 individuals, but

00:36:23.460 the entity.

00:36:24.320 The government

00:36:24.860 is absolutely

00:36:25.980 guilty until

00:36:26.720 proven innocent.

00:36:28.500 That's the

00:36:29.020 only way the

00:36:29.420 system works.

00:36:30.720 In other

00:36:31.040 words, the

00:36:31.420 government has

00:36:31.980 to prove

00:36:32.600 they're not

00:36:33.160 lying to you.

00:36:34.160 They have to

00:36:34.500 show their

00:36:35.180 numbers.

00:36:35.720 They have to

00:36:35.980 be open to

00:36:36.540 audit.

00:36:37.280 They've got to

00:36:37.660 be able to

00:36:38.020 show you the

00:36:38.620 ballots.

00:36:39.180 They've got to

00:36:39.480 be able to

00:36:39.840 show you the

00:36:40.520 process.

00:36:41.480 If you do a

00:36:42.100 FOIA request,

00:36:43.040 they've got to

00:36:43.980 show you the

00:36:44.560 documents.

00:36:45.740 So the

00:36:46.300 government is

00:36:46.980 100% guilty

00:36:47.960 unless they

00:36:49.240 prove otherwise.

00:36:49.860 And what do

00:36:51.920 electronic voting

00:36:53.180 machines do?

00:36:56.420 They make it

00:36:57.320 essentially impossible

00:36:58.460 to prove that an

00:36:59.580 election is

00:37:00.460 clean.

00:37:03.220 Now, you

00:37:03.860 also, nobody's

00:37:05.080 proven that

00:37:05.660 there's any

00:37:06.100 evidence that an

00:37:06.900 election was

00:37:07.400 rigged in any

00:37:08.720 major way.

00:37:10.580 So I have to

00:37:11.600 throw that in

00:37:12.200 there so I

00:37:12.600 don't get kicked

00:37:13.180 off of social

00:37:13.760 media.

00:37:14.080 I'm not aware

00:37:16.360 of any

00:37:16.720 evidence that

00:37:17.340 the 2020

00:37:17.860 election was

00:37:18.600 rigged in

00:37:19.760 any non-trivial

00:37:21.020 way.

00:37:22.760 But I

00:37:24.520 can't think of

00:37:25.060 another reason

00:37:25.620 for having

00:37:26.020 electronic voting

00:37:26.880 machines.

00:37:27.860 Can you?

00:37:29.040 Because there's

00:37:30.220 no way that

00:37:30.780 they're less

00:37:31.480 expensive.

00:37:33.080 They add

00:37:34.120 complexity.

00:37:35.700 They make the

00:37:36.960 public doubt

00:37:37.680 the outcome.

00:37:38.860 and they

00:37:40.180 add an

00:37:40.680 element that

00:37:41.740 is either

00:37:42.800 hard or

00:37:43.420 impossible to

00:37:44.240 audit.

00:37:45.100 In other

00:37:45.440 words, I'm

00:37:46.280 pretty sure we

00:37:47.100 do not have

00:37:47.620 access to the

00:37:48.580 internal code

00:37:49.540 of the

00:37:51.140 companies that

00:37:52.760 make the

00:37:53.040 machines.

00:37:54.260 Now, just to

00:37:54.940 be clear, I'm

00:37:55.800 not accusing

00:37:57.200 anybody in

00:37:58.260 the electronic

00:38:01.300 voting machine

00:38:02.120 business of

00:38:02.940 any impropriety.

00:38:04.400 I'm not aware

00:38:05.300 of any.

00:38:06.440 I'm just saying

00:38:07.420 I can't think of

00:38:08.160 another reason

00:38:08.760 that you

00:38:09.060 would use

00:38:09.500 their product

00:38:10.400 unless you

00:38:11.800 wanted to

00:38:12.240 make sure

00:38:12.620 that you

00:38:12.880 could cover

00:38:13.340 up fraud.

00:38:14.740 So,

00:38:16.420 does anybody

00:38:20.300 disagree with

00:38:21.220 that?

00:38:22.320 Why would

00:38:22.800 you use the

00:38:23.340 expensive,

00:38:24.180 complicated,

00:38:24.920 worst system

00:38:25.900 when you have

00:38:27.200 access to the

00:38:27.980 same system

00:38:28.520 everybody else

00:38:29.120 has and

00:38:29.940 everybody who's

00:38:31.000 an expert

00:38:31.420 would agree

00:38:31.920 it's a better

00:38:32.300 system?

00:38:34.340 I only see

00:38:35.160 one reason.

00:38:36.920 All right.

00:38:37.240 So,

00:38:38.760 here's another

00:38:40.980 crack in the

00:38:42.080 system.

00:38:43.280 Do you

00:38:43.680 remember,

00:38:44.580 it was less

00:38:45.840 than a year

00:38:46.200 ago that I

00:38:46.740 got cancelled.

00:38:48.800 And as part

00:38:49.500 of that larger

00:38:50.020 conversation,

00:38:50.800 I've said

00:38:51.260 many times in

00:38:52.860 public recently,

00:38:53.980 that when I

00:38:55.600 worked for big

00:38:56.120 corporations,

00:38:57.060 that both of

00:38:57.640 my bosses

00:38:58.180 told me

00:38:59.360 directly that

00:39:00.800 they couldn't

00:39:01.240 promote me

00:39:01.780 because I was

00:39:02.600 white and

00:39:03.100 male.

00:39:03.760 Still am.

00:39:04.500 Still white and 1.00

00:39:05.220 male.

00:39:05.400 And the

00:39:07.720 reaction to

00:39:08.320 that from

00:39:08.980 black

00:39:09.900 observers,

00:39:11.580 usually

00:39:12.180 editors and

00:39:13.120 writers and

00:39:13.760 fairly prominent

00:39:15.060 black observers,

00:39:17.200 they said,

00:39:18.080 you're probably

00:39:18.560 lying.

00:39:20.100 Since they

00:39:20.940 assumed I was

00:39:21.460 racist anyway,

00:39:22.580 they said,

00:39:22.980 you're probably

00:39:23.360 lying about

00:39:24.000 that and

00:39:25.080 can you

00:39:25.560 present any

00:39:27.040 evidence?

00:39:27.940 Can you give

00:39:28.460 me any

00:39:29.020 evidence that

00:39:29.660 that happened

00:39:30.120 to you?

00:39:30.440 Now, my

00:39:31.340 first reaction

00:39:31.960 was, it

00:39:33.400 was 30

00:39:33.840 years ago.

00:39:35.140 Or no,

00:39:35.560 longer than

00:39:35.960 that.

00:39:36.460 Yeah, it

00:39:36.680 was like 30

00:39:37.220 years ago.

00:39:38.580 And my

00:39:39.340 bosses would

00:39:40.160 be quite

00:39:40.760 elderly, but

00:39:43.100 I could.

00:39:43.740 I mean, I

00:39:44.280 know their

00:39:44.640 names, I

00:39:45.200 don't know

00:39:45.420 where they

00:39:45.680 live anymore,

00:39:46.340 but I

00:39:47.120 could tell

00:39:47.420 you their

00:39:47.680 names.

00:39:48.600 And if you

00:39:49.000 wanted to

00:39:49.320 talk to

00:39:49.660 them, if

00:39:50.440 they're still

00:39:50.780 alive, they

00:39:52.340 would tell

00:39:52.660 you exactly

00:39:53.220 what I

00:39:53.720 told you.

00:39:54.760 But when

00:39:55.660 I said

00:39:56.040 that, it

00:39:57.120 still sounded

00:39:57.660 like an

00:39:58.020 excuse.

00:39:59.420 And I

00:39:59.800 recognized

00:40:00.220 that now.

00:40:01.000 So it

00:40:01.300 sounded

00:40:01.560 like, hey,

00:40:02.900 you've got

00:40:03.280 a gigantic

00:40:04.000 claim.

00:40:05.480 That's a

00:40:05.860 really big

00:40:06.280 claim.

00:40:07.640 And people

00:40:08.080 said, really,

00:40:08.840 why wouldn't

00:40:09.160 you sue?

00:40:09.880 Or, you

00:40:10.100 know, of

00:40:10.320 course you

00:40:10.660 couldn't sue

00:40:11.140 in those

00:40:11.480 days for

00:40:11.920 that.

00:40:12.520 At least

00:40:12.940 it didn't

00:40:13.680 help you

00:40:14.000 if you

00:40:14.200 did.

00:40:15.860 So do

00:40:16.520 you know

00:40:16.680 what my

00:40:16.900 new approach

00:40:17.420 is?

00:40:18.020 Instead of

00:40:18.600 saying, yes,

00:40:19.300 there might

00:40:19.620 be two

00:40:20.080 elderly people,

00:40:20.960 if you

00:40:21.220 hunted them

00:40:21.700 down, they 0.56

00:40:22.080 might support

00:40:22.660 my story.

00:40:23.680 Do you

00:40:23.900 know what I

00:40:24.180 say now?

00:40:26.040 Do you

00:40:26.520 know any

00:40:26.840 white people?

00:40:27.340 people, go

00:40:29.960 to any

00:40:31.300 white person

00:40:31.940 you know

00:40:32.340 who's male

00:40:32.880 and ask

00:40:33.900 them their

00:40:34.220 experience.

00:40:35.760 I will

00:40:36.040 give you,

00:40:36.760 I actually

00:40:37.440 checked to

00:40:39.000 see how

00:40:39.260 many there

00:40:39.580 are, I

00:40:40.700 will give

00:40:41.000 you 120

00:40:41.960 million

00:40:42.520 eyewitnesses,

00:40:43.480 120 white

00:40:45.840 men in the

00:40:46.320 United States

00:40:46.880 and 100%

00:40:48.500 of them

00:40:48.860 will tell

00:40:49.200 me the

00:40:49.520 same thing.

00:40:50.700 Every one.

00:40:51.680 So my

00:40:52.140 claim is not

00:40:52.820 that there

00:40:53.180 are two

00:40:53.500 people in

00:40:54.000 the world

00:40:54.720 who will

00:40:55.260 back up

00:40:55.680 my story.

00:40:56.720 No, my

00:40:57.260 claim is

00:40:57.720 that there

00:40:57.980 are 160

00:40:58.820 million of

00:40:59.480 them and

00:41:00.660 that every

00:41:01.920 one of

00:41:02.240 them,

00:41:02.860 every one

00:41:03.340 of them,

00:41:04.060 100%,

00:41:04.820 not 99,

00:41:06.180 not 99.9,

00:41:07.940 100% will

00:41:09.540 back up my

00:41:10.100 story.

00:41:10.960 And they

00:41:11.360 will tell

00:41:11.660 you their

00:41:12.000 own

00:41:12.200 experiences.

00:41:13.480 Now,

00:41:14.400 here's what's

00:41:15.500 changed.

00:41:17.380 Less than

00:41:18.080 a year ago,

00:41:20.420 a lot of

00:41:21.720 well-meaning

00:41:22.420 and I think

00:41:22.980 honest,

00:41:23.940 you know,

00:41:24.940 brokers were

00:41:26.220 saying,

00:41:26.700 I'm not sure

00:41:27.140 that's really

00:41:27.860 true.

00:41:29.080 Because imagine

00:41:29.740 if you had

00:41:30.300 gone the

00:41:31.180 last 30 or

00:41:31.960 40 years of

00:41:32.480 your life

00:41:32.840 never hearing

00:41:34.080 that,

00:41:35.100 and you'd

00:41:35.680 only heard

00:41:36.140 that there's

00:41:36.620 discrimination

00:41:37.160 against black 1.00

00:41:38.200 people,

00:41:38.620 which of

00:41:38.960 course there

00:41:39.300 is.

00:41:40.320 And you'd

00:41:40.760 only heard

00:41:41.200 that.

00:41:42.280 And then

00:41:42.620 somebody says,

00:41:43.220 everything you

00:41:43.980 knew was

00:41:44.320 wrong for

00:41:44.820 30 years.

00:41:46.900 What would

00:41:47.580 be your

00:41:47.840 reaction?

00:41:49.140 No way.

00:41:50.300 Yeah,

00:41:50.600 right.

00:41:50.900 So the

00:41:51.240 people who

00:41:51.660 doubted my

00:41:52.300 story are

00:41:53.780 completely

00:41:54.480 rational players.

00:41:56.980 They were

00:41:57.700 not being,

00:41:58.480 in my opinion,

00:41:59.600 they were

00:41:59.840 not just

00:42:00.320 being team

00:42:00.900 players,

00:42:01.500 although there's

00:42:02.020 a little of

00:42:02.340 that.

00:42:02.860 But they

00:42:03.220 weren't just

00:42:03.740 disagreeing

00:42:04.300 because they

00:42:04.640 were team

00:42:05.020 players.

00:42:05.740 They really

00:42:06.580 had never

00:42:07.420 heard of it.

00:42:07.880 and they

00:42:12.320 might ask,

00:42:13.420 how could

00:42:14.280 there be

00:42:14.540 120 million

00:42:16.340 people who

00:42:16.900 have the

00:42:17.180 same opinion

00:42:17.760 and experience

00:42:18.520 and I've

00:42:19.300 never heard

00:42:19.740 it?

00:42:21.360 Simple.

00:42:22.300 Look what

00:42:22.760 you did

00:42:23.060 when I

00:42:23.340 brought it

00:42:23.660 up.

00:42:24.940 If I

00:42:25.500 brought it

00:42:25.860 up, you

00:42:26.280 all said

00:42:26.660 I'm a

00:42:26.940 lying,

00:42:27.400 piece of

00:42:27.740 shit racist.

00:42:29.260 Why would

00:42:29.880 120 million

00:42:30.820 people want

00:42:31.600 to be a

00:42:31.920 lying,

00:42:32.240 piece of

00:42:32.580 shit racist?

00:42:33.960 There's a

00:42:34.600 very obvious

00:42:35.260 reason that

00:42:35.840 we didn't

00:42:36.100 bring it

00:42:36.420 up.

00:42:37.380 And also,

00:42:38.080 if you

00:42:38.400 looked at

00:42:38.760 the news

00:42:39.220 during that

00:42:39.700 period,

00:42:40.400 a lot of

00:42:40.980 people brought

00:42:41.480 it up.

00:42:43.060 There were

00:42:43.760 in fact

00:42:44.200 lots of

00:42:45.620 what they

00:42:46.160 called

00:42:46.460 reverse

00:42:46.920 racism

00:42:47.460 suits.

00:42:49.120 It was

00:42:49.680 wildly

00:42:50.340 known,

00:42:51.520 but it

00:42:51.840 was always

00:42:52.240 anecdotal.

00:42:53.640 There's this

00:42:54.060 one guy

00:42:54.520 who's

00:42:54.780 suing.

00:42:56.000 Oh,

00:42:56.280 here's

00:42:56.480 another

00:42:56.740 one guy

00:42:57.300 suing.

00:42:59.000 So,

00:43:00.060 if you

00:43:00.600 were just

00:43:00.860 watching the

00:43:01.340 news,

00:43:02.060 you'd

00:43:02.380 probably

00:43:02.580 think,

00:43:03.300 anecdotal.

00:43:04.380 A few

00:43:04.680 examples.

00:43:06.180 In no

00:43:06.900 way does

00:43:07.300 that describe

00:43:07.880 the larger

00:43:08.460 situation.

00:43:10.220 No,

00:43:10.720 wrong.

00:43:11.420 It was

00:43:11.740 exactly the

00:43:12.560 larger

00:43:12.820 situation.

00:43:13.980 All

00:43:14.240 120

00:43:15.220 million

00:43:15.840 people

00:43:16.220 will

00:43:16.440 tell you.

00:43:17.260 So,

00:43:17.500 you know

00:43:17.640 what I

00:43:17.860 say now?

00:43:19.300 I say,

00:43:20.100 you don't

00:43:20.880 know a

00:43:21.220 single

00:43:21.560 adult

00:43:21.940 white

00:43:22.220 man

00:43:22.560 who

00:43:23.960 knows

00:43:24.260 you

00:43:24.400 well

00:43:24.580 enough

00:43:24.780 to

00:43:24.940 tell

00:43:25.080 you

00:43:25.180 the

00:43:25.300 truth.

00:43:26.240 You

00:43:26.420 don't

00:43:26.580 even

00:43:26.760 know

00:43:26.980 one

00:43:27.380 adult

00:43:27.860 white

00:43:28.100 man.

00:43:29.380 Because

00:43:29.660 there's

00:43:30.220 no

00:43:30.500 way

00:43:30.780 you

00:43:31.000 would

00:43:31.140 believe

00:43:31.480 that

00:43:31.960 this

00:43:32.160 isn't

00:43:32.380 happening

00:43:32.800 if you

00:43:33.320 knew

00:43:33.500 even

00:43:33.900 one

00:43:34.720 adult

00:43:35.300 white

00:43:35.760 man.

00:43:37.600 That's

00:43:38.160 way better

00:43:38.600 than saying

00:43:39.140 you've

00:43:39.340 got this

00:43:39.640 one

00:43:39.860 example.

00:43:41.300 Just say

00:43:41.720 it's

00:43:41.940 everybody.

00:43:42.280 Rasmussen

00:43:49.240 at a

00:43:50.480 poll

00:43:50.700 said

00:43:51.100 that

00:43:53.300 a

00:43:53.440 majority

00:43:53.840 of

00:43:54.160 voters

00:43:54.560 don't

00:43:55.000 believe

00:43:55.320 that

00:43:55.560 Muslims

00:43:55.920 in

00:43:56.160 America

00:43:56.500 are

00:43:56.780 victims

00:43:57.080 of

00:43:57.420 unfair

00:43:57.780 treatment.

00:43:58.500 Now,

00:43:58.660 they had

00:43:58.880 some

00:43:59.180 detailed

00:43:59.860 results

00:44:00.420 that I'm

00:44:02.140 not going

00:44:02.460 to talk

00:44:02.740 about

00:44:03.040 for the

00:44:03.620 following

00:44:03.860 reason.

00:44:06.660 What's

00:44:07.220 the point

00:44:07.540 of asking

00:44:08.060 other

00:44:08.600 people

00:44:09.040 if you

00:44:10.500 think

00:44:10.860 a

00:44:11.340 different

00:44:11.620 group

00:44:12.000 is being

00:44:12.960 discriminated

00:44:13.660 against?

00:44:16.300 I just

00:44:17.000 told you

00:44:17.400 that for

00:44:17.740 the last

00:44:18.120 30 years

00:44:18.840 if you

00:44:19.320 had asked

00:44:19.700 black

00:44:20.060 Americans

00:44:20.640 do you

00:44:21.420 think

00:44:21.620 white men

00:44:22.140 are discriminated

00:44:23.040 against

00:44:23.440 America

00:44:23.900 they would

00:44:24.280 have said

00:44:24.480 ha ha ha

00:44:25.340 you idiot

00:44:25.900 no.

00:44:27.720 And yet

00:44:28.000 it was

00:44:28.400 the major

00:44:29.460 thing happening

00:44:30.060 in America

00:44:30.540 for 30

00:44:31.060 years.

00:44:32.080 So you

00:44:32.420 can't ask

00:44:33.020 the group

00:44:33.420 that's not

00:44:33.920 being

00:44:34.160 discriminated

00:44:34.900 against

00:44:35.420 if they

00:44:36.740 think some

00:44:37.140 other group

00:44:37.580 is being

00:44:37.940 discriminated

00:44:38.540 against.

00:44:40.720 So

00:44:41.160 I think

00:44:45.120 you can

00:44:45.400 only ask

00:44:45.880 the group

00:44:46.240 themselves

00:44:46.680 what their

00:44:47.120 experience is

00:44:47.900 and even

00:44:48.280 that's

00:44:48.520 subjective.

00:44:50.320 All right.

00:44:54.140 So

00:44:54.660 Jonathan

00:44:55.180 Turley

00:44:55.540 is talking

00:44:55.980 about this

00:44:56.380 story

00:44:56.720 that

00:44:58.120 there was

00:44:59.080 a federal

00:44:59.540 magistrate

00:45:00.300 issued a

00:45:01.580 major ruling

00:45:02.480 on this

00:45:03.180 Bakersfield

00:45:03.740 College

00:45:04.100 in California

00:45:04.700 saying that

00:45:05.820 they violated

00:45:06.840 the First

00:45:07.280 Amendment

00:45:07.540 rights of

00:45:08.140 a professor

00:45:08.700 Damon

00:45:09.400 Johnson

00:45:09.780 with its

00:45:10.940 DEI

00:45:11.480 mandates.

00:45:12.160 So basically

00:45:12.600 it's a

00:45:13.020 ruling

00:45:13.320 saying that

00:45:14.800 DEI went

00:45:15.940 too far

00:45:16.480 in one

00:45:17.480 college.

00:45:19.120 But it's

00:45:19.860 an important

00:45:20.180 case

00:45:20.560 Turley

00:45:20.960 says

00:45:21.360 because it

00:45:23.000 challenges

00:45:23.320 the claim

00:45:23.800 of universities

00:45:24.440 that their

00:45:25.040 DEI

00:45:25.420 policies

00:45:25.860 are

00:45:26.400 suggested

00:45:27.900 practices

00:45:28.520 versus

00:45:29.160 mandatory.

00:45:31.160 So I

00:45:31.340 guess the

00:45:31.640 colleges have

00:45:32.980 been getting

00:45:33.380 away with

00:45:33.860 saying oh

00:45:34.860 well we

00:45:35.820 have these

00:45:36.180 suggestions

00:45:36.800 but it's

00:45:37.980 not

00:45:38.200 mandatory.

00:45:39.420 But as

00:45:39.760 soon as

00:45:40.060 somebody

00:45:40.340 doesn't

00:45:40.680 follow the

00:45:41.180 suggestion

00:45:41.620 they get

00:45:42.680 canned.

00:45:44.100 So it's

00:45:45.100 not a

00:45:45.480 suggestion.

00:45:46.640 And if

00:45:46.840 it's not a

00:45:47.320 suggestion

00:45:47.800 well then

00:45:50.120 there's going

00:45:50.600 to be

00:45:50.940 greater legal

00:45:51.920 challenges

00:45:52.400 I think.

00:45:53.460 So this

00:45:53.760 is one

00:45:54.120 more

00:45:54.480 example

00:45:55.040 where a

00:45:55.580 DEI

00:45:56.160 will be

00:45:58.500 I think

00:45:59.960 it's on

00:46:00.260 its way

00:46:00.580 out.

00:46:00.860 but it

00:46:01.960 will put

00:46:02.460 up a

00:46:02.720 fight.

00:46:07.080 Vivek

00:46:07.720 Ramaswamy

00:46:08.520 did a

00:46:11.420 little video

00:46:11.960 talking about

00:46:12.580 the

00:46:12.840 advertisers

00:46:13.880 who as

00:46:14.760 he says

00:46:15.200 sanctimoniously

00:46:16.240 pause their

00:46:17.460 ad spending

00:46:17.920 on X.

00:46:18.540 He says

00:46:18.860 they're

00:46:19.020 cowards

00:46:19.500 and that

00:46:21.060 it is

00:46:21.480 different

00:46:21.860 when

00:46:22.280 individuals

00:46:22.860 consumers

00:46:23.780 decide to

00:46:25.140 boycott.

00:46:26.240 So if

00:46:26.540 an individual

00:46:27.100 consumer

00:46:27.700 decides not

00:46:28.500 to get

00:46:28.820 Bud Light

00:46:29.300 that's

00:46:30.400 perfectly

00:46:30.840 legitimate

00:46:31.340 but does

00:46:33.240 it make

00:46:33.580 sense for

00:46:34.560 a public

00:46:35.600 company

00:46:36.080 to do

00:46:39.840 what the

00:46:40.260 stockholders

00:46:40.960 did not

00:46:41.500 vote on

00:46:42.060 that's pretty

00:46:43.160 important.

00:46:45.320 And it

00:46:45.740 looks like

00:46:46.180 these companies

00:46:47.580 and this is

00:46:48.540 Vivek's take

00:46:49.280 he says

00:46:50.460 it's one

00:46:50.820 thing if

00:46:51.600 you want

00:46:51.840 to use

00:46:52.100 your own

00:46:52.460 money to

00:46:53.100 signal your

00:46:53.720 own personal

00:46:54.300 values

00:46:54.900 it's quite

00:46:55.760 another to

00:46:56.320 use corporate

00:46:56.960 money.

00:46:58.540 So basically

00:46:59.060 on behalf of

00:46:59.880 all these

00:47:00.160 stockholders

00:47:00.720 that may

00:47:01.100 not want

00:47:01.540 what you

00:47:01.860 want to

00:47:02.700 engage in

00:47:03.220 personal

00:47:03.600 virtue

00:47:03.960 signaling

00:47:04.380 which is

00:47:04.820 what these

00:47:05.200 executives

00:47:05.660 are doing.

00:47:07.720 And then he

00:47:08.000 also points out

00:47:08.640 it was based

00:47:09.020 on a false

00:47:09.520 pretense

00:47:10.000 anyway

00:47:10.420 because it

00:47:11.880 was based

00:47:12.260 on a

00:47:12.560 misinterpretation

00:47:13.400 of what

00:47:13.720 Elon Musk

00:47:14.200 said.

00:47:15.240 So it

00:47:15.500 wasn't even

00:47:15.980 accurate

00:47:16.600 they weren't

00:47:17.260 responding to

00:47:17.880 a real

00:47:18.200 thing

00:47:18.540 and they

00:47:20.200 were responding

00:47:21.040 with other

00:47:21.860 people's

00:47:22.260 money.

00:47:23.320 So thank

00:47:24.260 you for

00:47:24.620 being fucking

00:47:25.320 wrong and

00:47:26.380 spending other

00:47:27.040 people's money

00:47:27.720 to show us

00:47:28.420 you're awesome

00:47:28.860 while being

00:47:30.160 wrong with

00:47:31.280 other people's

00:47:31.860 money.

00:47:33.140 They should

00:47:33.420 all be

00:47:33.720 fired.

00:47:34.900 That's like

00:47:35.340 a sign of

00:47:35.780 incompetence.

00:47:39.580 Here's a

00:47:40.360 way to

00:47:41.520 know when

00:47:42.840 you're looking

00:47:43.220 at the

00:47:43.640 architecture of

00:47:44.500 deceit as

00:47:46.140 opposed to

00:47:46.660 a legitimate

00:47:47.300 entity.

00:47:49.600 And Mike

00:47:49.900 Benz on

00:47:50.980 X Platform

00:47:51.680 has been

00:47:52.020 great about

00:47:52.440 this.

00:47:52.740 And here's

00:47:55.560 an example

00:47:55.920 of it.

00:47:56.320 Ben

00:47:56.500 Collins

00:47:56.960 disgraced

00:47:58.580 journalist

00:48:00.700 Ben

00:48:01.040 Collins.

00:48:03.760 I'm doing

00:48:04.420 what the

00:48:05.120 left likes

00:48:05.620 to do.

00:48:06.840 They like

00:48:07.340 to just

00:48:07.660 throw in

00:48:08.040 disgraced

00:48:08.760 like it's

00:48:09.600 a fact.

00:48:10.900 If you

00:48:11.380 don't like

00:48:11.740 somebody or

00:48:12.300 you don't

00:48:12.540 like something

00:48:13.020 they said

00:48:13.420 in the

00:48:13.660 past,

00:48:14.360 you just

00:48:14.640 throw in

00:48:14.980 disgraced.

00:48:16.960 Now the

00:48:17.380 funny thing

00:48:17.760 is he is

00:48:18.200 actually kind

00:48:19.160 of disgraced.

00:48:20.620 There's a lot

00:48:21.220 of criticism

00:48:21.720 about him.

00:48:22.740 But he

00:48:24.940 was angry

00:48:26.240 because I

00:48:26.820 guess Musk

00:48:27.580 is going

00:48:28.040 after media

00:48:28.880 matters for

00:48:30.640 allegedly

00:48:33.420 lying about

00:48:34.500 the degree

00:48:36.500 at which

00:48:37.060 the advertisements

00:48:39.220 were paired

00:48:40.440 with bad

00:48:41.160 content.

00:48:42.940 And there's

00:48:45.340 a suggestion

00:48:45.900 that there

00:48:46.340 might be a

00:48:46.960 criminal remedy

00:48:47.920 for that as

00:48:48.780 well as

00:48:49.140 civil.

00:48:50.260 So Musk

00:48:50.880 is suing

00:48:51.500 them.

00:48:51.800 In a civil

00:48:52.820 way.

00:48:53.920 But at

00:48:54.320 least one

00:48:54.700 person thinks

00:48:55.260 it might

00:48:55.500 be criminal

00:48:56.040 what they

00:48:57.320 did.

00:48:58.860 And so

00:48:59.080 Ben Collins

00:48:59.680 says,

00:49:00.700 so,

00:49:02.060 do you know

00:49:02.980 what I said

00:49:03.320 about so?

00:49:04.920 When you

00:49:05.540 start a

00:49:05.940 sentence with

00:49:06.480 so?

00:49:07.740 I call it

00:49:08.560 the so-tell.

00:49:10.760 It's a signal

00:49:11.460 for cognitive

00:49:12.180 dissonance.

00:49:13.460 Whatever

00:49:13.720 follows the

00:49:14.500 word so

00:49:15.100 on social

00:49:16.160 media is

00:49:17.220 something which

00:49:17.920 is misstated

00:49:18.840 in a way to

00:49:19.500 be ridiculous

00:49:20.160 to make

00:49:21.180 your point.

00:49:23.540 So

00:49:23.680 disgraced

00:49:24.360 journalist Ben

00:49:25.600 Collins says,

00:49:26.760 so,

00:49:27.560 they're going

00:49:27.940 to lock

00:49:28.340 up a bunch

00:49:28.840 of media

00:49:29.220 matters

00:49:29.580 researchers

00:49:30.220 for noticing

00:49:30.960 that racists

00:49:31.660 love this

00:49:32.160 website?

00:49:33.140 Sure,

00:49:33.520 go for it.

00:49:35.020 Now,

00:49:35.880 okay,

00:49:36.220 what followed

00:49:36.720 so?

00:49:38.560 They're going

00:49:39.160 to lock

00:49:39.460 up a bunch

00:49:39.900 of media

00:49:40.280 matters

00:49:40.660 researchers?

00:49:42.240 Oh,

00:49:42.860 researchers.

00:49:43.320 So as

00:49:45.320 Mike Benz

00:49:45.920 has taught us,

00:49:46.620 and there

00:49:47.320 are lots

00:49:47.600 of examples

00:49:48.140 to back

00:49:48.500 this up.

00:49:49.360 Researcher

00:49:50.040 is what

00:49:51.420 you call

00:49:51.900 somebody who's

00:49:52.640 really just

00:49:53.160 on the payroll

00:49:53.840 of somebody

00:49:54.560 trying to

00:49:56.200 push a

00:49:56.740 narrative.

00:49:57.500 You call

00:49:57.960 them researchers,

00:49:59.200 but they're

00:50:00.000 really narrative

00:50:00.820 pushers. 0.99

00:50:03.040 So that's

00:50:04.500 a matter of

00:50:05.960 opinion there.

00:50:07.160 And they

00:50:07.720 says that

00:50:08.520 the reason

00:50:09.040 they would

00:50:09.300 be locked

00:50:09.660 up is

00:50:10.040 because they

00:50:10.560 quote,

00:50:10.960 notice that

00:50:11.620 racists love

00:50:12.360 this website?

00:50:13.900 No,

00:50:15.140 that is not

00:50:15.820 exactly a

00:50:16.500 good summation

00:50:17.120 of what's

00:50:17.900 happening.

00:50:19.300 Not at

00:50:20.000 all.

00:50:21.320 So,

00:50:22.120 yeah,

00:50:22.700 every time

00:50:23.360 you see

00:50:23.620 researchers,

00:50:24.800 and media

00:50:25.380 matters does

00:50:26.740 say that

00:50:27.140 their people

00:50:27.600 are researchers.

00:50:28.860 They actually

00:50:29.300 call them

00:50:29.740 that.

00:50:30.580 They're

00:50:30.820 researchers.

00:50:34.560 So look

00:50:35.300 for researchers

00:50:36.000 as your

00:50:36.600 signal of

00:50:37.400 fakeness.

00:50:39.440 And as

00:50:39.780 Mike Benz

00:50:40.260 points out,

00:50:40.840 the same

00:50:41.180 framing is

00:50:41.660 used to

00:50:42.060 launder DHS

00:50:43.140 censorship,

00:50:44.000 Stanford

00:50:44.280 Internet

00:50:44.680 Observatory,

00:50:45.820 mass

00:50:46.420 flagging,

00:50:47.000 and crisis

00:50:47.440 PR ops,

00:50:48.100 and countless

00:50:48.500 other economic

00:50:49.200 coercion jobs, 0.99

00:50:50.700 custom-built

00:50:51.480 to kill

00:50:52.180 free speech,

00:50:52.980 says Mike.

00:50:54.620 All right,

00:50:55.260 there's an

00:50:55.580 NBC poll

00:50:56.320 that says

00:50:57.460 that Trump

00:50:58.740 is leading

00:50:59.180 Biden by

00:50:59.860 46% to

00:51:00.920 44% in

00:51:01.520 a general

00:51:01.920 election

00:51:02.240 poll.

00:51:03.140 Now,

00:51:03.340 of course,

00:51:03.680 we don't

00:51:04.300 have general

00:51:04.820 elections.

00:51:05.440 We have

00:51:05.740 an electoral

00:51:07.260 college

00:51:07.820 situation,

00:51:08.780 so the

00:51:09.340 battleground

00:51:09.900 states matter

00:51:10.500 more.

00:51:11.500 But it

00:51:11.900 would be

00:51:12.500 insanely

00:51:14.560 revolutionary

00:51:15.880 and unusual

00:51:17.080 if the

00:51:18.380 Republican

00:51:18.820 won the

00:51:19.480 popular vote.

00:51:21.600 So that

00:51:22.280 would be a

00:51:22.760 big deal,

00:51:23.460 because even

00:51:23.860 Trump didn't

00:51:24.420 win the

00:51:24.740 popular vote

00:51:25.340 when he

00:51:25.640 became

00:51:25.900 president.

00:51:27.260 So,

00:51:27.720 but more

00:51:29.640 importantly,

00:51:30.560 a subset

00:51:31.120 of that

00:51:31.680 poll said

00:51:32.460 that Trump

00:51:33.520 is leading

00:51:34.040 by 46

00:51:35.100 to 42

00:51:35.820 among voters

00:51:36.880 in the

00:51:37.200 18 to

00:51:37.700 39

00:51:38.160 years of

00:51:38.920 age,

00:51:40.040 whereas

00:51:41.000 Biden

00:51:41.820 won this

00:51:42.520 group by

00:51:43.300 26 points

00:51:44.960 in 2020.

00:51:47.040 Can this

00:51:47.960 poll even

00:51:48.620 be real?

00:51:50.580 Do you

00:51:50.800 believe,

00:51:51.220 I mean,

00:51:51.420 this sounds

00:51:52.160 crazy,

00:51:52.680 doesn't it?

00:51:53.780 Do you

00:51:54.100 believe that

00:51:54.680 the youngest

00:51:55.520 people,

00:51:56.020 18 to

00:51:56.380 39,

00:51:57.840 picked

00:51:58.100 Biden by

00:51:58.720 26 points

00:51:59.960 higher than

00:52:01.100 the vote

00:52:01.800 for Trump,

00:52:03.220 but that in

00:52:03.840 that time,

00:52:04.560 that's reversed

00:52:05.240 so much that

00:52:06.040 Trump is

00:52:06.440 actually

00:52:06.740 leading that

00:52:07.480 vote?

00:52:10.800 Well,

00:52:11.400 first of all,

00:52:11.880 I would

00:52:12.100 doubt the

00:52:12.440 polling,

00:52:13.720 but let's

00:52:14.320 take the

00:52:14.940 assumption

00:52:16.320 that there's

00:52:17.780 a big move,

00:52:18.920 maybe not

00:52:19.420 that big.

00:52:21.400 Maybe,

00:52:22.020 okay,

00:52:23.160 you're

00:52:23.880 second-guessing

00:52:24.600 me ahead of

00:52:25.300 time here.

00:52:27.160 What is

00:52:27.860 missing in

00:52:28.660 this data?

00:52:30.260 Let's say

00:52:30.740 it's true

00:52:31.140 that the

00:52:31.540 18 to

00:52:32.040 39

00:52:32.460 group has

00:52:34.280 moved

00:52:34.640 massively

00:52:35.220 to Trump.

00:52:36.440 What did

00:52:37.100 I leave

00:52:37.460 out?

00:52:39.040 Is there

00:52:39.360 any data

00:52:40.280 you would

00:52:40.680 like to

00:52:41.000 know about

00:52:41.620 this group,

00:52:43.220 18 to

00:52:43.720 39,

00:52:44.380 that moved

00:52:45.060 massively to

00:52:45.820 Trump?

00:52:46.600 What's the

00:52:47.180 obvious question?

00:52:49.280 Gender.

00:52:50.740 They left

00:52:51.320 down gender.

00:52:53.460 Do you

00:52:53.740 think that

00:52:54.080 the poll

00:52:54.540 discriminated

00:52:55.980 by gender?

00:52:56.660 Of course

00:52:56.960 they did.

00:52:57.360 They always

00:52:57.660 do.

00:52:58.380 They always

00:52:59.040 ask men,

00:52:59.860 women, 1.00

00:53:00.280 Democrat,

00:53:00.820 Republican,

00:53:01.360 right?

00:53:01.540 Why don't

00:53:04.020 you think

00:53:04.340 that was

00:53:04.620 worth

00:53:04.820 mentioning?

00:53:07.780 I don't

00:53:08.480 know what

00:53:09.240 the breakdown

00:53:10.300 would be,

00:53:11.260 but here's

00:53:11.680 my speculation.

00:53:14.780 It's all

00:53:15.520 men.

00:53:17.240 It's all

00:53:17.640 men.

00:53:19.460 You saw

00:53:20.380 Trump go

00:53:21.060 to the

00:53:21.500 UFC fight,

00:53:23.740 and Joe

00:53:24.700 Rogan was

00:53:25.200 talking about

00:53:25.720 it.

00:53:26.320 They didn't

00:53:26.920 just cheer

00:53:27.660 for him,

00:53:28.880 as Joe

00:53:29.400 Rogan was

00:53:29.900 pointing out.

00:53:30.420 They almost

00:53:31.320 lifted the

00:53:31.940 roof.

00:53:33.820 It was

00:53:34.460 like,

00:53:34.880 apparently

00:53:35.240 the situation

00:53:36.260 was pandemonium

00:53:37.780 when he

00:53:38.520 walked in.

00:53:39.640 And,

00:53:39.900 you know,

00:53:40.220 there's nothing

00:53:40.600 more male

00:53:41.100 than UFC,

00:53:42.100 obviously,

00:53:42.680 as female

00:53:43.080 fans do,

00:53:43.720 but there's

00:53:44.740 nothing more

00:53:45.200 male.

00:53:47.440 I think

00:53:48.440 that young

00:53:50.720 men

00:53:51.100 will save

00:53:53.180 us.

00:53:55.320 I think

00:53:56.100 young men

00:53:56.780 have figured

00:53:58.300 out they

00:53:58.700 have to take

00:53:59.080 some leadership

00:53:59.660 there's a

00:54:01.080 leadership

00:54:01.400 gap,

00:54:02.140 and I

00:54:02.560 think

00:54:02.680 they're

00:54:02.840 taking it.

00:54:03.940 Now,

00:54:04.220 they do it

00:54:04.600 in a small

00:54:05.100 way by

00:54:05.840 moving their

00:54:06.380 votes.

00:54:08.580 They're going

00:54:09.120 to do it

00:54:09.480 in a bigger

00:54:09.880 way.

00:54:11.920 Yeah,

00:54:12.340 they're going

00:54:12.680 to do it

00:54:13.020 in a bigger

00:54:13.420 way.

00:54:14.840 And I'm

00:54:16.520 very curious

00:54:17.280 what the

00:54:17.640 breakdown was.

00:54:19.460 If anybody

00:54:20.160 sees it,

00:54:20.720 could you

00:54:21.000 tweet it

00:54:21.560 at me?

00:54:22.440 Because I'm

00:54:23.200 guessing that

00:54:23.960 the movement

00:54:24.380 was almost

00:54:25.200 all men.

00:54:26.680 Do you want

00:54:27.000 to take the

00:54:27.420 other side of

00:54:27.860 that bet?

00:54:29.220 Does anybody

00:54:29.640 want to bet

00:54:30.180 that it

00:54:30.540 wasn't?

00:54:31.000 Well, I'll

00:54:31.300 say mostly,

00:54:31.920 not all.

00:54:32.980 But I'll

00:54:33.260 bet it was

00:54:33.740 a majority

00:54:35.040 men were

00:54:35.660 the ones

00:54:35.960 who moved,

00:54:36.880 if the

00:54:37.340 polling holds

00:54:37.900 up, which

00:54:38.940 is the

00:54:39.200 question.

00:54:42.100 All right.

00:54:43.200 And to

00:54:43.620 me, that's

00:54:44.000 the bigger

00:54:44.360 story.

00:54:45.260 To me, the

00:54:45.760 bigger story

00:54:46.400 is the

00:54:47.440 gender

00:54:48.000 switch.

00:54:48.500 I've been

00:54:48.700 saying for

00:54:49.420 five years

00:54:50.340 now that

00:54:51.520 Democrats are

00:54:52.240 the party

00:54:52.580 of women,

00:54:53.700 and there's

00:54:54.000 nothing wrong

00:54:54.460 with that,

00:54:54.860 and the

00:54:56.420 Republicans

00:54:57.120 are the

00:54:57.520 party of

00:54:57.920 men.

00:54:59.140 Nothing

00:54:59.480 wrong with

00:54:59.840 that.

00:55:00.860 But they're

00:55:01.520 different.

00:55:02.800 And if you're

00:55:03.380 a man who's

00:55:04.640 a Democrat,

00:55:05.720 you're in a

00:55:06.600 weird world.

00:55:08.020 Right?

00:55:08.900 At least the

00:55:09.800 women who are 1.00

00:55:10.360 Republicans agree

00:55:11.460 with the men who

00:55:12.160 are Republicans,

00:55:13.100 so they're on

00:55:14.060 the same side.

00:55:15.800 But if you're

00:55:16.360 a Democrat and

00:55:17.200 you're a man,

00:55:19.820 your group

00:55:20.420 hates you.

00:55:22.420 And if you're

00:55:23.220 a Jewish man,

00:55:24.000 and you're

00:55:25.400 a Democrat,

00:55:26.820 you've really

00:55:27.420 got some

00:55:27.800 questions.

00:55:28.860 You're really

00:55:29.340 asking some

00:55:30.200 questions this

00:55:30.840 month,

00:55:31.140 aren't you?

00:55:31.920 Wait a minute.

00:55:33.760 I thought

00:55:34.300 Jewish men

00:55:34.920 were welcome

00:55:35.460 as Democrats.

00:55:36.940 Well, not as

00:55:37.480 much as you

00:55:37.940 thought.

00:55:39.180 But definitely

00:55:40.180 welcome as

00:55:40.760 Republicans.

00:55:43.480 All right.

00:55:45.980 On the

00:55:46.640 X platform,

00:55:47.620 one of my

00:55:48.560 favorite

00:55:49.220 follows got

00:55:50.960 swatted.

00:55:52.680 Do any of you

00:55:53.160 follow Dom?

00:55:54.000 Lucre,

00:55:55.060 L-U-C-R-E. 1.00

00:55:57.460 Real good

00:55:58.120 follow,

00:55:58.800 lots of good

00:55:59.280 content.

00:56:00.220 I recommend

00:56:00.640 him.

00:56:01.440 What you need

00:56:02.020 to know,

00:56:02.460 because it's

00:56:02.840 important to

00:56:03.260 the story,

00:56:03.920 is that he's

00:56:04.520 a black man

00:56:05.160 with dreadlocks.

00:56:06.880 And someone

00:56:08.820 with a VPN,

00:56:10.040 so they were

00:56:10.440 anonymous,

00:56:11.000 contacted the

00:56:11.580 police and

00:56:12.560 told him he

00:56:13.020 was barricaded

00:56:13.760 in a room

00:56:14.180 trying to kill

00:56:14.800 his girlfriend,

00:56:15.660 and he doesn't

00:56:16.360 have a girlfriend.

00:56:17.980 He doesn't

00:56:18.400 have one at

00:56:18.820 the moment.

00:56:19.120 And so,

00:56:23.160 but here's

00:56:24.100 the good

00:56:24.420 news.

00:56:25.500 The good

00:56:26.160 news is that

00:56:26.880 the police

00:56:27.460 force was

00:56:28.300 professional

00:56:28.960 and checked

00:56:31.420 with him and

00:56:32.440 did not do

00:56:33.020 something crazy.

00:56:34.180 So they

00:56:34.660 basically checked

00:56:35.520 with him first,

00:56:36.800 and then,

00:56:37.420 you know,

00:56:37.640 they still

00:56:37.980 showed up,

00:56:38.980 had to do

00:56:39.460 the report

00:56:39.940 and everything,

00:56:40.340 but it didn't

00:56:41.580 get dangerous.

00:56:43.060 Now,

00:56:43.580 here's my

00:56:43.980 take on

00:56:44.400 that.

00:56:44.700 if you

00:56:46.520 call in

00:56:47.120 a fake

00:56:48.000 SWAT

00:56:48.760 call

00:56:49.940 on anybody,

00:56:52.800 you're putting

00:56:53.300 them in

00:56:53.700 danger,

00:56:54.140 would you

00:56:54.360 agree?

00:56:55.500 You're putting

00:56:55.860 them in

00:56:56.080 danger.

00:56:57.680 It's

00:56:57.920 basically

00:56:58.560 a murder,

00:57:00.180 it's attempted

00:57:00.720 murder,

00:57:01.260 in my opinion,

00:57:02.380 it's attempted

00:57:02.840 murder.

00:57:04.400 Now,

00:57:04.840 let's

00:57:05.840 enhance that.

00:57:08.500 And you

00:57:08.780 call,

00:57:09.340 let's say,

00:57:10.120 let's say,

00:57:11.180 you called

00:57:12.740 in a fake

00:57:13.500 SWAT

00:57:13.940 on a

00:57:15.060 black guy

00:57:15.760 with dreadlocks.

00:57:18.740 Now,

00:57:19.280 you're a

00:57:19.540 little bit

00:57:19.880 more murdery,

00:57:20.700 aren't you?

00:57:21.420 That's a

00:57:21.760 little extra

00:57:22.160 murdery,

00:57:23.460 because,

00:57:23.860 you know,

00:57:24.620 you might

00:57:25.180 expect,

00:57:25.840 well,

00:57:26.660 police might

00:57:27.220 have some

00:57:27.720 kind of

00:57:29.360 biases.

00:57:31.660 To me,

00:57:32.280 this looks

00:57:32.580 like attempted

00:57:33.160 murder.

00:57:34.920 So,

00:57:36.160 this can't

00:57:36.980 get worse.

00:57:38.740 That's really

00:57:39.380 a bottom.

00:57:42.320 All right,

00:57:42.840 CNN is

00:57:45.320 reporting

00:57:45.760 that that

00:57:46.740 Shifa 0.52

00:57:47.140 hospital

00:57:47.760 and the

00:57:48.600 tunnels

00:57:48.900 that they

00:57:49.260 found

00:57:49.660 are not

00:57:53.780 compelling,

00:57:55.280 meaning that

00:57:56.600 CNN is

00:57:57.440 not yet

00:57:57.920 convinced,

00:57:58.500 and they

00:57:58.700 have

00:57:58.880 reporters

00:57:59.380 on site.

00:58:01.220 So,

00:58:01.440 CNN has

00:58:01.960 people on

00:58:02.620 the compound

00:58:03.180 at the

00:58:03.520 hospital,

00:58:04.180 and they've

00:58:04.780 been taken

00:58:05.140 around by

00:58:05.620 the IDF

00:58:06.360 to show

00:58:07.080 them that

00:58:07.720 Hamas was 0.86

00:58:08.680 there,

00:58:08.900 and they

00:58:09.900 showed them

00:58:10.280 some weapons,

00:58:12.460 and CNN's

00:58:13.340 take on the

00:58:13.820 weapons is,

00:58:15.100 it doesn't

00:58:15.560 even look like

00:58:16.140 they were in

00:58:16.500 one place.

00:58:17.160 They might

00:58:17.420 have been

00:58:17.640 relocated,

00:58:18.640 and it

00:58:19.320 wasn't that

00:58:19.820 many.

00:58:20.620 For some

00:58:21.280 kind of a

00:58:21.660 big story,

00:58:22.480 it wasn't

00:58:22.840 really many

00:58:23.280 weapons.

00:58:24.380 And then

00:58:24.920 they were

00:58:25.180 shown a

00:58:25.580 tunnel,

00:58:26.880 which the

00:58:27.960 IDF says

00:58:28.600 is 55

00:58:29.780 feet long,

00:58:32.600 and they're

00:58:35.580 not allowed

00:58:35.980 to go down

00:58:36.520 in it,

00:58:37.660 and apparently

00:58:38.160 there's nothing

00:58:38.720 in the

00:58:39.060 tunnel.

00:58:40.240 There's a

00:58:40.640 doorway at

00:58:41.160 the end

00:58:41.580 that they

00:58:42.220 have to

00:58:42.440 break into

00:58:43.020 somehow,

00:58:43.640 so that's

00:58:43.980 the whole

00:58:44.320 operation,

00:58:45.460 but it's

00:58:46.060 just a

00:58:46.400 blank tunnel

00:58:47.040 of 55

00:58:47.720 feet,

00:58:49.220 and CNN,

00:58:50.520 to their

00:58:50.820 credit,

00:58:52.200 to their

00:58:52.620 credit,

00:58:53.740 CNN's not

00:58:55.120 buying it.

00:58:56.900 Isn't that

00:58:57.540 interesting?

00:58:59.000 CNN's not

00:58:59.700 buying it.

00:59:00.680 Now,

00:59:01.000 they're not

00:59:01.280 saying it's

00:59:01.640 not there.

00:59:03.060 They're

00:59:03.540 saying that

00:59:03.960 the evidence

00:59:04.540 is short

00:59:06.240 of compelling.

00:59:10.180 Now,

00:59:10.400 what's going

00:59:10.660 Oh,

00:59:11.300 was it

00:59:11.620 meters?

00:59:12.060 55 meters?

00:59:14.140 Did I

00:59:14.720 have the

00:59:15.180 measurement

00:59:16.360 wrong?

00:59:17.320 I think

00:59:17.600 somebody was

00:59:18.100 correcting me

00:59:18.640 there.

00:59:20.480 But here's

00:59:21.160 my take.

00:59:22.420 If it's

00:59:23.340 one little

00:59:24.200 piece of

00:59:25.880 tunnel,

00:59:29.120 somebody

00:59:29.680 says 165

00:59:31.300 feet.

00:59:31.520 But if

00:59:33.280 that's all

00:59:33.700 it is,

00:59:35.140 they better

00:59:35.520 come up

00:59:35.920 with more.

00:59:39.760 Better

00:59:40.240 come up

00:59:40.620 with more.

00:59:45.260 And then I

00:59:46.580 have heard

00:59:47.120 from other

00:59:47.680 sources in

00:59:48.940 Israel that 0.89

00:59:49.580 the fog of

00:59:50.320 war is

00:59:50.600 pretty deep,

00:59:51.680 and that also

00:59:52.480 it's really

00:59:53.900 slow going,

00:59:54.980 looking around

00:59:55.700 the compound,

00:59:56.420 because things

00:59:56.940 might be

00:59:57.420 booby-trapped.

00:59:58.080 So it's

00:59:59.260 super slow,

01:00:01.880 but we're

01:00:03.700 still expecting

01:00:04.380 that there'll

01:00:04.840 be a major

01:00:05.700 compound under

01:00:06.500 the hospital.

01:00:10.800 Yeah.

01:00:12.760 All right.

01:00:14.800 So keep an

01:00:15.780 eye on that.

01:00:16.840 I don't think

01:00:17.500 that the

01:00:17.860 hospital story

01:00:18.820 should have

01:00:21.580 any power

01:00:22.140 over us,

01:00:22.940 no matter

01:00:23.900 what they

01:00:24.240 find there.

01:00:24.760 because no

01:00:25.760 matter what

01:00:26.100 they find

01:00:26.480 in the

01:00:26.720 hospital,

01:00:27.680 Hamas is 0.99

01:00:28.680 still Hamas. 0.97

01:00:30.060 They still

01:00:30.460 have human

01:00:30.960 shields.

01:00:31.960 They still

01:00:32.260 have hostages.

01:00:33.160 I mean,

01:00:33.580 it doesn't

01:00:34.420 make them

01:00:34.840 any better

01:00:35.340 or worse,

01:00:36.500 no matter

01:00:37.060 what happened

01:00:37.520 at the

01:00:37.780 hospital.

01:00:38.540 But of

01:00:39.000 course,

01:00:39.480 the public

01:00:40.120 will try

01:00:40.520 to make a

01:00:40.860 thing out of

01:00:41.260 it,

01:00:41.620 no matter

01:00:41.980 what.

01:00:42.220 there is

01:00:44.940 a story

01:00:45.440 that I

01:00:46.120 don't believe

01:00:46.560 for a

01:00:46.860 minute,

01:00:47.620 that there

01:00:48.240 is a

01:00:48.760 possible deal

01:00:50.140 to secure

01:00:50.720 more of the

01:00:51.180 hostages,

01:00:52.340 and that

01:00:52.800 Hamas is 0.99

01:00:54.680 asking for a

01:00:55.280 four to five

01:00:55.720 day pause

01:00:56.280 in fighting,

01:00:57.540 and part of

01:00:58.260 the reason

01:00:58.580 is that they

01:00:59.560 need the

01:00:59.900 time to

01:01:00.380 collect the

01:01:01.180 hostages

01:01:01.660 from different

01:01:02.220 places,

01:01:03.100 so they need

01:01:03.880 the pause,

01:01:05.120 so they can

01:01:05.500 get them

01:01:05.760 together,

01:01:06.680 and they

01:01:07.060 would give

01:01:08.080 some of

01:01:08.820 them,

01:01:09.240 50 of

01:01:09.860 them.

01:01:10.000 Do you

01:01:12.180 believe any

01:01:12.580 of that?

01:01:14.140 I don't

01:01:14.700 believe any

01:01:15.080 of that.

01:01:16.560 First of

01:01:17.140 all,

01:01:17.380 there is no

01:01:17.740 way in the

01:01:18.200 world that

01:01:19.320 Israel would 1.00

01:01:20.200 agree in

01:01:20.980 good faith

01:01:21.580 to a five

01:01:22.180 day pause.

01:01:23.760 There is

01:01:24.180 not any

01:01:24.560 chance of

01:01:24.960 that.

01:01:26.040 Secondly,

01:01:27.420 if the

01:01:27.860 deal is not

01:01:28.480 all of the

01:01:29.060 hostages,

01:01:30.620 I don't

01:01:31.380 think Israel 0.93

01:01:31.860 is going to

01:01:32.160 take the

01:01:32.480 deal,

01:01:33.120 because it

01:01:34.060 looks like

01:01:34.440 what Hamas

01:01:35.000 wants to

01:01:35.460 do is

01:01:36.980 buy time,

01:01:38.980 so I

01:01:39.320 think they

01:01:39.620 want to

01:01:39.900 release 50

01:01:40.640 to establish

01:01:42.060 that they

01:01:42.540 will release

01:01:43.380 hostages.

01:01:44.920 Then the

01:01:45.660 pressure on

01:01:46.120 Israel would 1.00

01:01:46.640 be tremendous,

01:01:47.700 because people

01:01:48.440 would say,

01:01:48.860 hey, they

01:01:49.580 already gave

01:01:50.100 us 50,

01:01:51.300 and it was

01:01:51.740 just a

01:01:52.040 five-day

01:01:52.420 pause.

01:01:53.520 Imagine if

01:01:54.380 you did a

01:01:54.780 full pause,

01:01:55.640 how many

01:01:56.500 of you

01:01:56.640 would get

01:01:56.820 that.

01:01:58.200 Right?

01:01:58.900 So it's

01:02:00.200 all about

01:02:00.560 public reaction,

01:02:02.560 and you

01:02:03.840 hate to say

01:02:04.620 this about

01:02:05.160 hostages,

01:02:06.260 but they

01:02:06.900 are in the

01:02:07.940 context of

01:02:08.600 war,

01:02:08.940 and Israel

01:02:10.680 is going

01:02:10.900 to have

01:02:11.040 to make

01:02:11.260 the war

01:02:11.720 decision.

01:02:13.080 The war

01:02:13.780 decision would

01:02:14.540 suggest that

01:02:15.100 you should

01:02:15.360 not make

01:02:15.740 this deal,

01:02:16.960 even if

01:02:17.380 it's real.

01:02:18.920 Would you

01:02:19.460 agree?

01:02:20.240 Even if the

01:02:21.000 offer is

01:02:21.780 real, that

01:02:22.820 a five-day

01:02:23.420 pause gets

01:02:24.100 you 50

01:02:24.640 hostages,

01:02:26.080 I'd say

01:02:26.660 don't take

01:02:27.080 it.

01:02:28.720 Now, you

01:02:29.160 can never

01:02:30.040 admit that

01:02:30.640 to the

01:02:31.360 public.

01:02:32.360 You can

01:02:32.680 never tell

01:02:33.300 the public,

01:02:33.820 yeah, they

01:02:34.060 offered us

01:02:34.500 50 hostages,

01:02:35.400 and we

01:02:35.560 said no.

01:02:36.400 Never,

01:02:37.000 never.

01:02:37.220 You can

01:02:38.000 never say

01:02:38.540 that.

01:02:39.800 But from

01:02:40.600 a military

01:02:41.360 perspective,

01:02:43.480 what would

01:02:44.440 happen is

01:02:45.020 that after

01:02:45.600 the 50,

01:02:47.420 the public

01:02:48.340 would guarantee

01:02:49.500 maximum pressure

01:02:51.180 on Israel

01:02:51.700 to pause

01:02:52.360 again to

01:02:53.620 get a few

01:02:54.020 more back.

01:02:55.480 You see

01:02:55.800 what I'm

01:02:56.020 talking about?

01:02:57.340 That the

01:02:57.880 50 is the

01:02:58.580 beginning of

01:02:59.160 a keep

01:03:00.300 pausing

01:03:00.680 them, keep

01:03:01.160 pausing

01:03:01.500 them, so

01:03:02.380 Hamas can 0.84

01:03:03.000 recover and

01:03:03.740 get their

01:03:04.080 public relations

01:03:05.000 in order and

01:03:05.960 build a narrative

01:03:06.680 and stuff

01:03:07.160 like that.

01:03:07.440 Oh, we're

01:03:07.780 good guys,

01:03:08.380 we're just

01:03:08.700 giving you

01:03:09.240 back your

01:03:09.560 people.

01:03:10.300 Yeah, Israel 0.99

01:03:11.420 cannot allow

01:03:12.380 them to do

01:03:13.660 the slow

01:03:14.220 drip that

01:03:16.040 probably most

01:03:17.660 of the public

01:03:18.140 would want

01:03:18.540 them to do.

01:03:20.420 If you

01:03:20.980 ask the

01:03:21.360 average person

01:03:22.320 who's not

01:03:23.180 really following

01:03:23.860 it, they're

01:03:24.320 no military

01:03:25.260 expert, they

01:03:25.980 don't even

01:03:26.280 know the

01:03:26.540 history of

01:03:26.940 the region,

01:03:27.700 don't exactly

01:03:28.340 know what

01:03:28.720 Hamas is up

01:03:29.380 to, and

01:03:30.220 if you

01:03:30.440 said, hey,

01:03:31.020 we could

01:03:31.240 give 50

01:03:31.740 hostages back

01:03:32.580 with just a

01:03:33.040 five-day

01:03:33.440 pause, and

01:03:34.380 then we'd

01:03:34.680 go right back

01:03:35.140 to it.

01:03:35.540 I mean, it's

01:03:37.140 not like we're

01:03:37.800 stopping, it's

01:03:38.620 just a five-day

01:03:39.200 pause.

01:03:40.380 Any average

01:03:41.260 person would

01:03:41.860 think that was

01:03:42.320 a reasonable

01:03:42.780 offer, but

01:03:45.140 it's a terrible

01:03:45.780 idea.

01:03:47.480 Now, I hate

01:03:48.120 to say this in

01:03:48.740 public, because

01:03:49.640 I know they're

01:03:50.080 real families

01:03:50.700 with real

01:03:51.140 hostages, and

01:03:52.560 to them, nothing

01:03:53.140 would be more

01:03:53.700 important than

01:03:54.140 getting them

01:03:54.540 back, and I

01:03:55.100 get that.

01:03:56.220 And if it

01:03:57.020 were my

01:03:57.360 family, I

01:03:58.940 would be

01:03:59.220 pushing as

01:03:59.680 hard as

01:04:00.000 possible for the

01:04:00.720 pause.

01:04:01.060 Let me

01:04:01.740 say that

01:04:02.100 directly.

01:04:03.500 If it

01:04:04.020 were my

01:04:04.360 family, or

01:04:05.480 even somebody

01:04:06.080 I was a

01:04:06.980 little bit

01:04:07.280 closer to, I'd

01:04:10.120 push for the

01:04:10.560 pause.

01:04:12.300 I don't

01:04:12.860 think it's

01:04:13.180 the best

01:04:13.440 thing for

01:04:13.780 the Israeli

01:04:15.080 operation, but

01:04:17.020 if it's my

01:04:17.560 family, I'm

01:04:18.060 pushing for

01:04:18.460 the pause.

01:04:20.000 I'll take

01:04:20.500 that chance

01:04:21.220 that my

01:04:21.960 loved ones

01:04:23.160 are in the

01:04:23.480 50.

01:04:24.440 I'll take

01:04:24.840 that chance.

01:04:25.760 So it's a

01:04:26.520 very good

01:04:26.960 strategy by

01:04:27.560 Hamas, because 1.00

01:04:28.440 it's a genuine

01:04:29.480 division.

01:04:31.420 I mean, it's

01:04:31.720 really going

01:04:32.040 to cause a

01:04:32.420 problem.

01:04:33.200 But I

01:04:33.580 think Israel 0.93

01:04:34.020 would be

01:04:34.780 ill-advised to

01:04:36.500 accept it.

01:04:39.260 And I

01:04:39.840 also think

01:04:40.300 that it's a

01:04:40.720 fake story.

01:04:42.060 I think it's

01:04:42.500 a fake story

01:04:43.180 in the sense

01:04:43.740 that if

01:04:44.240 Israel is

01:04:44.880 acting like

01:04:45.660 they're going

01:04:45.960 to take it,

01:04:46.840 what they're

01:04:47.360 probably doing

01:04:48.000 is collecting

01:04:48.580 intel by

01:04:50.240 pretending to

01:04:50.900 negotiate.

01:04:52.420 So, for

01:04:52.880 example, if

01:04:54.160 Hamas says

01:04:54.900 we need time

01:04:55.620 because the

01:04:56.360 hostages are

01:04:57.040 in different

01:04:57.420 locations, then

01:04:59.020 Israel just 0.88

01:04:59.640 learned that

01:05:00.100 the hostages are

01:05:00.920 in different

01:05:01.260 locations.

01:05:03.340 Kind of good

01:05:04.020 to know.

01:05:04.900 They might

01:05:05.260 learn some

01:05:05.620 other stuff,

01:05:06.980 like any

01:05:08.940 complications or

01:05:10.280 anything about

01:05:11.660 the hostages or

01:05:12.760 what it would

01:05:13.240 take to gather

01:05:14.020 them up.

01:05:14.900 It might be a

01:05:15.440 little more

01:05:15.700 information.

01:05:16.800 So I think

01:05:17.180 Israel is

01:05:17.820 pretending to

01:05:18.840 be interested,

01:05:19.780 but there's no

01:05:20.460 way that they're

01:05:21.160 going to make

01:05:21.400 that deal.

01:05:22.480 That's what I

01:05:22.880 think.

01:05:23.700 Could be

01:05:24.140 wrong.

01:05:25.280 Meanwhile, ESG is

01:05:26.500 dying in

01:05:26.960 America.

01:05:28.380 The flows

01:05:29.140 into ESG

01:05:30.560 funds are

01:05:31.900 slowed or

01:05:33.420 reversed.

01:05:34.960 But here's the

01:05:35.660 interesting thing.

01:05:37.100 ESG is still

01:05:38.080 big in Europe.

01:05:38.840 Why would

01:05:40.780 ESG be dying 1.00

01:05:42.400 in America

01:05:43.060 and fairly

01:05:43.700 quickly, but

01:05:45.380 not in Europe?

01:05:46.840 What does

01:05:47.540 America have

01:05:48.140 that Europe

01:05:48.480 doesn't have?

01:05:49.000 Yeah, me.

01:05:54.760 Just me.

01:05:56.040 That's all you

01:05:56.640 need.

01:05:58.340 I'm just

01:05:59.100 kidding.

01:06:00.300 As far as

01:06:01.220 you know.

01:06:02.160 Well, Amazon

01:06:02.740 is offering

01:06:03.700 free AI

01:06:04.500 courses, proving

01:06:06.040 once again that

01:06:06.980 my predictions

01:06:07.540 are amazing.

01:06:08.880 So the

01:06:09.380 courses are

01:06:09.900 free and

01:06:10.500 they're not

01:06:10.860 just for

01:06:11.440 Amazon

01:06:11.860 employees.

01:06:13.160 So it

01:06:13.660 would be

01:06:13.840 courses to

01:06:14.620 teach Americans

01:06:15.400 how to use

01:06:17.400 how to use

01:06:18.900 AI.

01:06:20.780 Now, remember

01:06:21.580 when you

01:06:21.880 thought AI

01:06:22.320 was going

01:06:22.680 to take

01:06:22.940 your job?

01:06:24.540 And I

01:06:25.160 said, well,

01:06:26.060 it's definitely

01:06:26.420 going to take

01:06:26.780 some jobs.

01:06:27.620 No doubt

01:06:28.080 about that.

01:06:29.180 But if you

01:06:30.520 work with it

01:06:31.080 for two

01:06:31.500 minutes, the

01:06:32.080 first thing

01:06:32.460 you learn

01:06:32.840 is, oh,

01:06:33.860 wow, you're

01:06:34.940 going to need

01:06:35.240 a trained

01:06:35.700 human being

01:06:36.320 using the

01:06:36.860 AI or you're

01:06:37.760 not going to

01:06:38.080 get anything

01:06:38.500 that's useful.

01:06:40.080 So of

01:06:40.480 course, for

01:06:42.120 every AI

01:06:42.860 application that

01:06:43.660 gets used,

01:06:44.300 there has to

01:06:44.640 be a trained

01:06:45.120 person.

01:06:46.980 I'm not

01:06:47.580 even sure

01:06:48.400 if it

01:06:48.660 will increase

01:06:49.440 employment.

01:06:51.020 It might be

01:06:51.720 the kind

01:06:52.040 of job

01:06:52.400 where a

01:06:52.920 lot of

01:06:53.160 people could

01:06:53.620 easily learn

01:06:54.540 to use

01:06:54.960 it.

01:06:55.900 You don't

01:06:56.300 have to

01:06:56.600 have a

01:06:57.100 Yale

01:06:57.440 education to

01:06:58.900 use AI.

01:06:59.860 Sort of

01:07:00.320 ordinary

01:07:00.820 person,

01:07:02.440 two days

01:07:03.460 of study

01:07:04.080 and you'd

01:07:04.720 be practically

01:07:05.260 an expert.

01:07:07.680 So I

01:07:10.600 think this

01:07:11.240 is more

01:07:12.040 of a

01:07:12.520 hint that

01:07:13.800 AI will

01:07:14.720 increase

01:07:15.900 employment

01:07:16.420 instead of

01:07:17.060 decrease

01:07:17.380 and it

01:07:18.300 will just

01:07:18.600 be another

01:07:19.000 tool like

01:07:19.620 computers

01:07:20.060 were.

01:07:21.080 You might

01:07:21.580 not be

01:07:21.900 old enough

01:07:22.240 to remember

01:07:22.680 when people

01:07:23.600 thought that

01:07:24.060 computers would

01:07:24.840 put people

01:07:25.300 out of work.

01:07:26.840 It's funny

01:07:27.500 when you think

01:07:27.940 about it,

01:07:28.300 isn't it?

01:07:29.100 Isn't it funny

01:07:29.720 to look back

01:07:30.340 and we thought

01:07:30.820 that computers

01:07:31.560 would put

01:07:32.000 people out of

01:07:32.540 work?

01:07:33.360 Well, they

01:07:33.800 did.

01:07:34.780 They did put

01:07:35.340 people out of

01:07:35.860 work.

01:07:36.360 But the

01:07:36.720 people who

01:07:37.120 got work

01:07:37.800 was just

01:07:38.880 immensely more

01:07:39.640 than the

01:07:39.920 people who

01:07:40.240 put out of

01:07:40.600 work.

01:07:41.700 So I think

01:07:42.200 that's going

01:07:42.520 to be the

01:07:42.740 same with

01:07:43.000 AI.

01:07:43.220 AI will

01:07:44.500 definitely

01:07:45.100 put people

01:07:45.640 out of

01:07:45.860 work.

01:07:46.820 But they

01:07:47.180 might have

01:07:47.480 a better

01:07:47.740 job,

01:07:48.380 which is

01:07:48.820 learning how

01:07:49.220 to use

01:07:49.520 AI to do

01:07:50.220 some new

01:07:50.580 thing.

01:07:54.180 All right.

01:07:58.140 Let's talk

01:07:58.780 about Sam

01:07:59.320 Altman and

01:08:00.020 Microsoft.

01:08:00.800 All right,

01:08:01.080 nothing about

01:08:01.660 the story of

01:08:02.860 Sam Altman

01:08:03.500 being fired

01:08:05.600 by OpenAI.

01:08:07.900 None of it

01:08:08.440 quite makes

01:08:09.040 sense.

01:08:09.880 So I'll just

01:08:10.320 try to keep

01:08:11.040 you up to

01:08:11.700 date.

01:08:11.960 But keep

01:08:12.840 in mind

01:08:13.360 that even

01:08:13.900 as I'm

01:08:14.540 talking,

01:08:15.600 all of the

01:08:16.160 facts may

01:08:16.620 have been

01:08:16.860 reversed.

01:08:18.380 Everything's

01:08:18.820 changing so

01:08:19.460 quickly that

01:08:20.460 you can't

01:08:20.820 even talk

01:08:21.220 about it

01:08:21.580 without it

01:08:22.020 being obsolete

01:08:23.220 by the time

01:08:23.680 you're done

01:08:23.940 with a

01:08:24.200 sentence.

01:08:24.860 Here's what

01:08:25.300 we think

01:08:25.780 we know,

01:08:26.880 according to

01:08:27.500 the news.

01:08:29.040 So,

01:08:29.620 you know,

01:08:30.040 Microsoft

01:08:30.440 has a

01:08:31.740 $13 billion

01:08:33.520 investment

01:08:34.360 in OpenAI.

01:08:37.340 So the

01:08:37.980 company that

01:08:38.480 fired Sam

01:08:39.240 Altman,

01:08:40.220 and then

01:08:40.680 Greg Brockman,

01:08:41.620 you know,

01:08:42.120 left to,

01:08:43.500 largely

01:08:45.220 controlled by

01:08:46.380 Microsoft.

01:08:47.920 Now,

01:08:48.320 Microsoft's

01:08:49.040 stock

01:08:49.540 apparently

01:08:50.020 dropped

01:08:50.520 when Sam

01:08:51.800 Altman

01:08:52.100 left

01:08:52.660 or was

01:08:53.760 fired.

01:08:54.600 Then there

01:08:54.980 was talk

01:08:55.420 about the,

01:08:56.560 I think,

01:08:57.700 500 members

01:08:58.960 of the

01:08:59.280 staff,

01:09:00.080 out of

01:09:00.280 700,

01:09:01.140 550 out

01:09:02.160 of 700,

01:09:03.260 told the

01:09:04.280 board to

01:09:04.800 resign or

01:09:05.380 they would.

01:09:07.060 Can you

01:09:07.320 even imagine

01:09:07.760 that?

01:09:08.140 Imagine being

01:09:08.640 the board

01:09:09.200 and 550

01:09:11.020 of your

01:09:11.560 700

01:09:12.040 employees

01:09:12.820 signed a

01:09:14.180 letter

01:09:14.440 saying either

01:09:16.260 all of us

01:09:17.020 are going

01:09:17.300 to leave,

01:09:17.740 that's the

01:09:18.040 whole company

01:09:18.560 basically,

01:09:19.340 either the

01:09:19.740 whole company

01:09:20.300 quits and

01:09:21.700 they would

01:09:21.940 all be easily

01:09:22.480 employed if

01:09:23.180 they had AI

01:09:23.780 experience,

01:09:24.820 or the

01:09:26.120 board has

01:09:26.600 to quit.

01:09:28.700 Have you

01:09:29.260 ever seen

01:09:29.620 anything like

01:09:30.060 that?

01:09:30.500 I've never

01:09:31.020 seen anything

01:09:31.500 like that.

01:09:31.980 And the

01:09:34.300 number one

01:09:34.840 name on

01:09:35.240 the list

01:09:35.700 was Mira

01:09:36.760 Murati,

01:09:38.000 who was,

01:09:39.180 but is no

01:09:39.700 longer,

01:09:40.660 the acting

01:09:41.420 CEO,

01:09:42.880 or president,

01:09:44.580 the acting

01:09:44.860 president.

01:09:45.400 So the

01:09:45.640 acting

01:09:45.860 president was

01:09:47.660 a CEO,

01:09:48.360 acting CEO,

01:09:49.820 I think,

01:09:50.840 signed the

01:09:51.660 letter at

01:09:51.940 the top.

01:09:53.920 Now,

01:09:55.320 allegedly,

01:09:56.760 the solution,

01:09:57.880 if you want

01:09:58.160 to call it

01:09:58.520 that,

01:09:58.860 is a

01:09:59.920 new CEO

01:10:00.780 is being

01:10:02.720 hired,

01:10:03.060 this guy,

01:10:03.420 Emmett

01:10:03.680 Scheer,

01:10:05.260 and he

01:10:06.300 used to

01:10:06.600 be the

01:10:07.420 founder of

01:10:07.960 Twitch.

01:10:09.180 He's one

01:10:09.500 of the

01:10:09.740 Twitch guys.

01:10:11.280 So,

01:10:11.980 you know,

01:10:12.260 lots of

01:10:12.560 experience.

01:10:15.660 What do

01:10:16.220 we know

01:10:16.460 about him?

01:10:18.320 What do

01:10:18.900 we know

01:10:19.180 about this

01:10:19.740 Emmett

01:10:21.120 Scheer?

01:10:22.460 Well,

01:10:22.800 I saw

01:10:23.120 some

01:10:23.440 research

01:10:24.060 by

01:10:24.380 Joshua

01:10:26.060 Lysak,

01:10:27.940 super

01:10:29.100 ghost

01:10:30.000 writer,

01:10:30.780 and

01:10:31.660 here's

01:10:32.960 some

01:10:33.120 things

01:10:33.320 we

01:10:33.460 know.

01:10:34.600 He's

01:10:34.960 not

01:10:35.480 really

01:10:35.720 big

01:10:35.980 on

01:10:36.180 President

01:10:36.520 Trump,

01:10:37.320 and he's

01:10:37.640 been

01:10:37.800 vocal

01:10:38.100 about

01:10:38.380 it.

01:10:39.980 Surprised?

01:10:42.140 No.

01:10:45.880 When

01:10:46.560 Emmett Scheer

01:10:47.480 was the

01:10:47.960 Twitch

01:10:48.200 CEO,

01:10:50.160 an

01:10:51.320 anti-white

01:10:52.040 transgender

01:10:52.600 activist

01:10:53.500 who

01:10:54.440 identified

01:10:54.940 as a

01:10:55.560 deer

01:10:55.840 was

01:10:57.040 appointed

01:10:57.460 to the

01:10:57.920 Safety

01:10:58.220 Advisory

01:10:58.720 Council.

01:11:00.780 You

01:11:02.940 feel

01:11:03.120 uncomfortable

01:11:03.540 yet?

01:11:05.420 Let me

01:11:06.000 just say

01:11:06.360 it again,

01:11:07.260 because the

01:11:07.700 first time

01:11:08.120 I said

01:11:08.480 it,

01:11:08.660 you probably

01:11:08.980 were like,

01:11:09.700 what?

01:11:10.720 I feel

01:11:11.580 like I

01:11:11.860 heard you

01:11:12.240 wrong.

01:11:13.340 We'll

01:11:13.500 try it

01:11:13.760 again.

01:11:14.960 The new

01:11:15.740 CEO of

01:11:16.880 arguably the

01:11:19.360 most important

01:11:20.300 company in the

01:11:20.940 world,

01:11:21.380 OpenAI,

01:11:21.940 in his

01:11:24.000 prior job

01:11:25.260 as

01:11:25.460 Twitch

01:11:25.760 CEO,

01:11:27.420 they

01:11:28.060 employed

01:11:28.460 an

01:11:28.720 anti-white

01:11:29.500 transgender

01:11:30.120 activist

01:11:30.720 who

01:11:30.980 identified

01:11:31.440 as a

01:11:31.920 deer.

01:11:33.660 That

01:11:33.980 was who

01:11:34.360 was out

01:11:34.820 of the

01:11:35.040 Safety

01:11:35.340 Advisory

01:11:36.020 Council.

01:11:38.420 So the

01:11:41.520 indications

01:11:42.020 are that

01:11:42.560 he's

01:11:42.880 sort of

01:11:44.120 a

01:11:44.340 super

01:11:44.760 Democrat.

01:11:45.140 Democrat.

01:11:46.540 Now,

01:11:47.180 are you

01:11:47.700 worried if

01:11:48.440 an

01:11:48.640 intelligence

01:11:49.260 is created

01:11:51.220 by somebody

01:11:51.800 who's a

01:11:52.200 super

01:11:52.440 Democrat?

01:11:53.580 Or even

01:11:54.240 a super

01:11:54.640 Republican?

01:11:55.380 Same

01:11:55.640 problem.

01:11:57.340 It feels

01:11:57.880 like a

01:11:58.180 problem,

01:11:58.620 doesn't it?

01:11:59.520 Feels

01:11:59.860 like a

01:12:00.220 problem.

01:12:01.100 Now,

01:12:01.400 let me ask

01:12:01.820 you this

01:12:02.060 question,

01:12:02.700 and this

01:12:02.920 will blow

01:12:03.220 your mind.

01:12:03.800 You ready?

01:12:04.120 What were

01:12:07.960 the political

01:12:08.620 leanings of

01:12:09.280 Sam Altman?

01:12:10.300 Go.

01:12:11.720 What were

01:12:12.180 Sam Altman's

01:12:13.240 political

01:12:14.020 leanings?

01:12:14.960 Go.

01:12:16.840 You don't

01:12:17.600 know,

01:12:17.880 do you?

01:12:19.600 You don't

01:12:20.440 know.

01:12:22.900 Some are

01:12:23.700 saying left

01:12:24.500 libertarian,

01:12:26.240 center

01:12:26.520 right.

01:12:28.960 How

01:12:29.580 awesome is

01:12:30.160 that?

01:12:31.460 I got to

01:12:31.900 give Sam

01:12:32.320 Altman

01:12:32.600 credit.

01:12:34.120 He does

01:12:35.440 not easily

01:12:36.180 identify with

01:12:37.000 anything.

01:12:38.480 Now,

01:12:38.840 I'll give

01:12:39.120 you a little

01:12:39.520 behind-the-curtain

01:12:40.980 information.

01:12:42.540 I don't think

01:12:42.940 he'd mind.

01:12:43.780 I did meet

01:12:44.420 with Sam

01:12:44.900 Altman

01:12:45.240 several years

01:12:45.960 ago when

01:12:47.700 he was

01:12:48.040 considering a

01:12:48.720 run for

01:12:49.100 governor.

01:12:50.180 And he

01:12:50.680 was just

01:12:51.000 talking to

01:12:51.440 people who

01:12:53.140 kind of were

01:12:54.040 in that space

01:12:54.800 just to see

01:12:55.440 what they

01:12:55.700 thought.

01:12:56.040 And I'm a

01:12:56.340 Californian,

01:12:57.080 so I'd be

01:12:57.920 an obvious

01:12:58.260 one to talk

01:12:58.760 to.

01:12:59.360 So I

01:13:00.080 talked to

01:13:00.520 him for,

01:13:01.880 I don't

01:13:02.200 know,

01:13:02.480 an hour or

01:13:03.340 so.

01:13:04.520 Strictly

01:13:05.040 on politics.

01:13:06.980 And I

01:13:07.240 left not

01:13:08.500 being entirely

01:13:09.120 clear what

01:13:09.680 his politics

01:13:10.180 were.

01:13:11.280 And it's

01:13:11.820 not because

01:13:12.720 he's unclear.

01:13:15.320 It's because

01:13:16.180 I think he's

01:13:16.800 a pragmatist.

01:13:19.020 And

01:13:19.280 pragmatists

01:13:19.960 don't make

01:13:20.640 sense in

01:13:21.200 our world.

01:13:22.400 A pragmatist

01:13:23.200 is somebody

01:13:23.640 who wants

01:13:23.960 to do the

01:13:24.500 things that

01:13:24.920 work and

01:13:26.120 not do

01:13:26.600 things that

01:13:27.060 don't work.

01:13:28.900 That's how

01:13:29.540 he struck

01:13:29.880 me.

01:13:30.700 He struck

01:13:31.400 me as a

01:13:32.120 pure pragmatist.

01:13:34.060 Do what

01:13:34.520 works.

01:13:35.420 Don't do

01:13:35.840 what doesn't

01:13:36.260 work.

01:13:37.180 So those

01:13:37.740 of you who

01:13:38.160 are saying

01:13:38.520 he was

01:13:38.880 left-leaning,

01:13:40.420 did you

01:13:40.760 know he's

01:13:41.140 one of the

01:13:41.580 biggest

01:13:41.880 investors in

01:13:42.960 nuclear power?

01:13:46.040 Well,

01:13:46.680 fusion in

01:13:47.360 particular.

01:13:48.960 Didn't see

01:13:49.620 that coming.

01:13:50.820 Right?

01:13:51.160 So he's a

01:13:51.980 pure pragmatist.

01:13:53.680 And that

01:13:55.120 was exactly

01:13:56.000 who you want

01:13:56.820 to add a

01:13:57.520 new AI.

01:13:57.900 You want

01:13:59.260 somebody who

01:13:59.800 you say,

01:14:00.260 you know,

01:14:00.920 I feel like

01:14:01.800 he leaned

01:14:02.220 this way,

01:14:02.860 but then he

01:14:03.260 was on this

01:14:03.740 side and

01:14:04.180 this,

01:14:04.620 and it's

01:14:05.440 not entirely

01:14:05.960 clear.

01:14:07.280 That's exactly

01:14:08.340 who you want

01:14:09.160 in that job.

01:14:11.040 You don't

01:14:11.400 want the 0.55

01:14:11.740 person whose

01:14:12.380 politics you

01:14:13.240 know for

01:14:13.640 sure,

01:14:14.900 but that's

01:14:16.000 what you

01:14:16.220 got.

01:14:17.460 But it

01:14:17.840 gets better.

01:14:19.560 Ilya

01:14:20.020 Sutskiver,

01:14:22.440 who was on

01:14:23.260 the board,

01:14:23.720 and I guess

01:14:25.040 everybody seems

01:14:26.060 to think

01:14:27.540 he's the

01:14:28.120 smartest guy

01:14:28.840 in AI,

01:14:29.780 and really

01:14:30.140 the brains

01:14:31.540 of open

01:14:32.580 AI,

01:14:33.340 and I

01:14:34.040 think Musk

01:14:34.980 said he

01:14:35.580 tried to

01:14:36.580 recruit him,

01:14:37.260 and he's

01:14:37.520 like just

01:14:37.860 the best

01:14:38.280 guy.

01:14:39.700 And he

01:14:40.340 seemed to

01:14:40.660 be maybe

01:14:41.140 even the

01:14:41.540 one who

01:14:41.760 was behind

01:14:42.320 the firing

01:14:43.000 of Sam,

01:14:44.300 but this

01:14:45.460 morning he

01:14:46.000 posts,

01:14:46.900 I deeply

01:14:47.380 regret my

01:14:48.140 participation

01:14:48.840 in the

01:14:49.280 board's

01:14:49.600 actions.

01:14:50.760 What?

01:14:52.380 It's only

01:14:53.020 been a few

01:14:53.460 days.

01:14:53.840 I never

01:14:55.620 intended to

01:14:56.280 harm open

01:14:56.800 AI.

01:14:57.440 I love

01:14:58.000 everything we

01:14:58.540 built together

01:14:59.000 and I will

01:14:59.400 do everything

01:14:59.800 I can to

01:15:00.320 reunite the

01:15:01.000 company.

01:15:02.000 Well,

01:15:02.500 good luck

01:15:03.080 with that.

01:15:04.840 So we

01:15:05.320 still don't

01:15:05.780 know exactly

01:15:06.900 what was

01:15:09.880 going on.

01:15:11.260 But it

01:15:11.620 looks like

01:15:12.160 it seemed

01:15:12.580 to be a

01:15:13.120 clean,

01:15:14.500 the best

01:15:15.000 thinkers,

01:15:16.160 and I

01:15:16.480 think I

01:15:16.780 agree with

01:15:17.140 them,

01:15:17.560 is that

01:15:17.920 there was

01:15:18.140 a difference

01:15:18.580 about how

01:15:19.040 fast to

01:15:19.620 go.

01:15:20.860 And we're

01:15:21.460 told that

01:15:21.860 the new

01:15:22.200 CEO,

01:15:22.720 there's a

01:15:23.980 suggestion

01:15:24.360 he's kind

01:15:24.820 of a

01:15:25.620 slow-on

01:15:27.260 AI guy,

01:15:28.960 because I

01:15:29.280 think he

01:15:29.580 posted that

01:15:30.280 that would

01:15:30.680 be his

01:15:31.060 preference,

01:15:31.540 to go

01:15:31.800 slower on

01:15:32.400 AI.

01:15:33.840 But here's

01:15:35.540 the weird

01:15:35.860 part.

01:15:36.520 Remember I

01:15:36.980 told you

01:15:37.240 Microsoft

01:15:37.660 has this

01:15:38.380 giant chunk

01:15:39.640 of open

01:15:40.540 AI,

01:15:41.380 enough to

01:15:42.140 have functional

01:15:43.000 control over

01:15:43.820 a lot of

01:15:44.100 what they

01:15:44.360 do?

01:15:46.140 The result

01:15:47.700 is that

01:15:48.080 Microsoft

01:15:48.500 hired

01:15:49.180 Altman

01:15:50.040 to be

01:15:51.360 the CEO

01:15:51.940 of,

01:15:52.840 quote,

01:15:52.880 a new

01:15:53.220 group

01:15:53.740 that will

01:15:55.280 do

01:15:55.500 AI stuff.

01:15:59.480 What's

01:16:00.020 going on?

01:16:02.600 So

01:16:03.180 Microsoft

01:16:03.680 has,

01:16:05.240 you know,

01:16:05.460 this 13

01:16:06.100 billion investment

01:16:06.940 in the

01:16:08.340 biggest,

01:16:09.040 most successful

01:16:09.680 AI.

01:16:10.140 And they

01:16:11.700 take the

01:16:12.420 deposed

01:16:13.680 CEO and

01:16:15.360 they put

01:16:15.660 him in

01:16:15.920 charge of

01:16:16.500 Microsoft's

01:16:17.340 own AI,

01:16:17.900 presumably

01:16:19.800 he'll

01:16:21.500 recruit from

01:16:22.260 open AI?

01:16:24.560 Like,

01:16:24.860 is he

01:16:25.180 allowed to

01:16:26.300 kill

01:16:27.240 Microsoft's

01:16:28.060 other

01:16:28.480 project?

01:16:31.180 Because I

01:16:31.900 wonder if

01:16:32.420 the

01:16:33.280 CEO of

01:16:35.680 Microsoft,

01:16:37.420 I wonder

01:16:39.540 if this

01:16:40.160 is his

01:16:40.500 play.

01:16:42.460 Do you

01:16:43.160 think the

01:16:43.560 play is

01:16:44.800 to suck 0.99

01:16:46.280 the employees

01:16:47.100 out of

01:16:47.500 open AI

01:16:48.260 and build

01:16:49.980 within

01:16:50.340 Microsoft

01:16:50.820 a fully

01:16:51.540 owned AI

01:16:52.220 so they

01:16:53.240 don't have

01:16:53.580 to deal

01:16:53.840 with open

01:16:54.260 AI anymore?

01:16:57.560 At the

01:16:58.420 same time,

01:17:00.340 Musk 0.77

01:17:00.960 commented on

01:17:01.880 a post

01:17:02.360 in which

01:17:03.160 Microsoft

01:17:03.580 said it

01:17:04.140 was planning

01:17:04.600 a $50

01:17:06.020 billion

01:17:06.880 build-out

01:17:09.940 of data

01:17:10.880 centers

01:17:11.300 for AI,

01:17:12.860 specifically

01:17:13.360 for AI.

01:17:14.080 $50

01:17:15.400 billion.

01:17:18.140 Nothing

01:17:18.700 of that

01:17:19.100 scale has

01:17:19.680 ever been

01:17:20.060 even

01:17:20.360 proposed

01:17:20.920 by anybody

01:17:21.520 ever.

01:17:22.980 So it

01:17:23.540 looks to

01:17:23.880 me like

01:17:24.300 Microsoft's

01:17:25.100 play is

01:17:25.560 to own

01:17:26.000 AI,

01:17:26.860 and the

01:17:28.180 $13

01:17:28.660 billion they

01:17:29.480 put into

01:17:30.360 open AI,

01:17:32.540 I think

01:17:33.380 they're willing

01:17:34.780 to burn.

01:17:36.960 That would

01:17:37.740 be the

01:17:38.980 baller move

01:17:39.840 of all

01:17:40.360 baller moves.

01:17:41.180 if they

01:17:42.700 burn their

01:17:43.280 own $13

01:17:44.100 billion just

01:17:45.900 so they

01:17:46.240 can control

01:17:46.880 it better?

01:17:48.740 Because that's

01:17:49.500 what it

01:17:49.740 looks like.

01:17:51.140 Now, it's

01:17:51.580 way too

01:17:51.920 early to

01:17:52.340 know what

01:17:52.620 anybody's

01:17:53.060 thinking or

01:17:54.260 what anybody's

01:17:54.800 strategy is.

01:17:56.000 But on the

01:17:56.560 surface, it

01:17:57.920 looks like

01:17:58.340 Microsoft is

01:17:59.160 doing an

01:18:00.120 unfriendly

01:18:00.840 takeover of

01:18:02.480 their own

01:18:02.840 investment.

01:18:04.880 Now, if

01:18:05.420 they've got a

01:18:05.820 $50 billion

01:18:06.500 data center,

01:18:08.360 and let's

01:18:09.000 say that they

01:18:09.440 have this

01:18:09.840 huge advantage

01:18:11.160 in AI because

01:18:12.600 they have the

01:18:12.960 data center.

01:18:14.080 It looks like

01:18:14.600 that's their

01:18:14.980 play.

01:18:15.780 They want to

01:18:16.240 make sure they

01:18:16.640 own that

01:18:17.100 business.

01:18:19.340 They kind

01:18:20.100 of need to

01:18:20.520 own the

01:18:20.840 AI too.

01:18:22.540 Because you

01:18:23.500 don't want

01:18:23.880 open AI

01:18:24.500 someday saying,

01:18:25.880 you know

01:18:26.100 what, we've

01:18:27.360 decided to

01:18:27.920 take our

01:18:28.300 business away

01:18:28.880 from your

01:18:29.420 data center.

01:18:31.680 Because I

01:18:32.060 think they

01:18:32.500 could do

01:18:32.820 that, right?

01:18:33.940 And with

01:18:34.300 the current

01:18:34.880 ownership,

01:18:36.800 could not

01:18:37.260 the board

01:18:37.820 of open

01:18:39.680 AI say,

01:18:40.440 you know,

01:18:41.880 you've built

01:18:42.600 these data

01:18:43.060 centers, but

01:18:43.660 we don't

01:18:43.900 have a deal

01:18:44.320 for that,

01:18:45.220 so we're

01:18:45.660 going to

01:18:45.820 go to

01:18:46.040 Amazon

01:18:46.460 because they

01:18:46.920 offered us

01:18:47.400 a better

01:18:47.980 price.

01:18:49.020 Could they?

01:18:50.300 Or would

01:18:50.700 Microsoft have

01:18:51.780 had the

01:18:52.080 clout to

01:18:53.260 make them

01:18:53.720 use their

01:18:54.120 data centers

01:18:54.660 no matter

01:18:55.040 what?

01:18:56.820 Well, I

01:18:57.380 don't know,

01:18:58.500 but I do

01:18:58.980 know that if

01:18:59.580 Sam Altman

01:19:00.100 works for

01:19:00.840 Microsoft,

01:19:01.820 he's definitely

01:19:02.540 going to use

01:19:03.020 their data

01:19:03.400 centers.

01:19:05.080 So that

01:19:05.980 question is

01:19:06.480 answered, at

01:19:07.040 least for

01:19:07.360 Altman.

01:19:07.600 if it

01:19:12.660 means that

01:19:13.660 Microsoft is

01:19:14.640 going hard

01:19:15.260 on AI,

01:19:16.760 I think

01:19:17.620 I'm in

01:19:17.980 favor of

01:19:18.400 that.

01:19:20.760 And here's

01:19:21.300 why.

01:19:22.240 I understand

01:19:23.120 the argument

01:19:23.580 of the slow

01:19:24.340 AI people

01:19:25.040 because we

01:19:25.500 don't know

01:19:25.880 what the

01:19:26.180 dangers are.

01:19:27.540 Totally

01:19:27.880 understand it.

01:19:29.060 But I'll

01:19:29.440 tell you one

01:19:29.900 way to lose

01:19:30.540 for sure

01:19:31.100 is to

01:19:33.460 reach AGI

01:19:35.640 or the

01:19:36.300 strongest

01:19:37.260 version of

01:19:37.860 AI after

01:19:39.700 your

01:19:40.260 adversaries

01:19:41.220 do.

01:19:42.420 By far

01:19:43.200 that has

01:19:43.600 to be

01:19:43.840 more

01:19:44.040 dangerous

01:19:44.500 than

01:19:45.540 going

01:19:45.840 fast and

01:19:46.380 getting

01:19:46.540 there

01:19:46.740 first.

01:19:48.740 Would you

01:19:49.360 agree?

01:19:50.180 These are

01:19:50.800 unknowns,

01:19:51.440 so you

01:19:51.620 can't

01:19:51.820 actually

01:19:52.060 know

01:19:52.300 what is

01:19:52.600 the

01:19:52.720 bigger

01:19:52.880 risk.

01:19:53.700 But I

01:19:54.180 would be

01:19:54.540 way more

01:19:55.180 afraid of

01:19:55.680 China

01:19:55.980 getting

01:19:56.380 the

01:19:57.260 world

01:19:58.360 class

01:19:58.820 kind

01:19:59.060 of

01:19:59.160 AI

01:19:59.400 before

01:19:59.780 we

01:20:00.040 do.

01:20:00.960 So in

01:20:01.520 my

01:20:01.700 perfect

01:20:02.040 world,

01:20:02.980 Microsoft,

01:20:03.680 which I

01:20:03.960 believe is

01:20:04.500 a

01:20:04.680 responsible,

01:20:06.040 well-managed

01:20:06.720 company,

01:20:07.900 with America's

01:20:09.240 best interests

01:20:09.840 in mind,

01:20:10.400 I believe

01:20:10.840 that,

01:20:11.200 about

01:20:11.420 Microsoft,

01:20:12.860 that's

01:20:14.140 kind of

01:20:14.480 a good

01:20:14.900 stewardship

01:20:15.500 for

01:20:17.120 something

01:20:17.560 this

01:20:17.860 important

01:20:18.240 to the

01:20:18.840 military

01:20:20.140 and our

01:20:21.700 entire

01:20:22.040 existence.

01:20:23.760 I don't

01:20:24.080 know where

01:20:24.320 else I

01:20:24.660 would put

01:20:24.940 it.

01:20:27.560 Apple,

01:20:28.480 as much

01:20:28.920 as I

01:20:29.220 complain

01:20:29.620 about them

01:20:30.040 being a

01:20:30.380 racist

01:20:30.600 company,

01:20:31.280 etc.,

01:20:31.820 they're

01:20:32.420 also very

01:20:33.020 capable.

01:20:33.420 So there

01:20:34.880 are some

01:20:35.600 big

01:20:35.860 companies

01:20:36.200 that,

01:20:37.640 you know,

01:20:37.980 nobody's

01:20:38.340 perfect,

01:20:39.600 but if

01:20:39.980 AI has

01:20:40.720 to be

01:20:41.020 somewhere,

01:20:42.180 that's a

01:20:42.560 lot of

01:20:42.780 capability

01:20:43.300 to wrap

01:20:43.780 around

01:20:44.080 in,

01:20:44.400 so it's

01:20:45.360 better than

01:20:45.780 China getting 0.97

01:20:46.460 there first,

01:20:47.000 I think.

01:20:47.580 So I

01:20:47.880 guess I'm

01:20:48.240 a fast

01:20:48.960 AI guy.

01:20:50.960 If there

01:20:51.560 were some

01:20:51.960 way to

01:20:52.380 stop it

01:20:52.860 worldwide,

01:20:54.480 then we

01:20:54.940 could talk

01:20:55.340 about that.

01:20:56.000 But you're

01:20:56.340 not going

01:20:56.560 to stop

01:20:56.840 it worldwide.

01:20:58.200 As soon

01:20:58.620 as you

01:20:58.860 slow down,

01:20:59.500 China will 0.99

01:20:59.880 speed up,

01:21:00.760 if they're

01:21:01.520 smart.

01:21:01.820 All right.

01:21:06.500 Well,

01:21:07.000 that's what

01:21:07.320 we know

01:21:07.800 today.

01:21:09.520 Ladies and 0.98

01:21:10.040 gentlemen,

01:21:11.020 this concludes

01:21:11.780 the best

01:21:12.460 presentation

01:21:13.000 you'll ever

01:21:13.440 see.

01:21:15.160 And

01:21:15.260 YouTube,

01:21:17.920 thanks for

01:21:18.280 joining,

01:21:19.280 and I

01:21:19.960 will see

01:21:21.140 you tomorrow.

01:21:22.380 And remember,

01:21:24.220 the architecture

01:21:25.280 of deceit

01:21:26.120 has become

01:21:27.800 clear,

01:21:28.220 but it's

01:21:29.500 also

01:21:29.720 crumbling.

01:21:31.500 Talk to

01:21:32.020 you tomorrow.

01:21:32.360 Thank you.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - November 20, 2023

Episode 2298 Scott Adams： CWSA 11⧸20⧸23 The Architecture Of Deceit (AOD), Is Both Busy & Crumbling

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript