Real Coffee with Scott Adams - December 11, 2023


Episode 2319 CWSA 12⧸11⧸23 The 7 Hoaxes That Changed America. Should Government Apologize For DEI?


Episode Stats


Length

55 minutes

Words per minute

143.29028

Word count

7,971

Sentence count

5

Harmful content

Misogyny

7

sentences flagged

Hate speech

8

sentences flagged


Summary

Summaries generated with gmurro/bart-large-finetuned-filtered-spotify-podcast-summ .

In this episode of Coffee with Scott Adams, Scott takes a look at a recent article written by Vivek Kundnani, and takes a deep dive into what it says about the future of the space industry, and the potential impact it could have on the world.

Transcript

Transcript generated with Whisper (turbo).
Misogyny classifications generated with MilaNLProc/bert-base-uncased-ear-misogyny .
Hate speech classifications generated with facebook/roberta-hate-speech-dynabench-r4-target .
00:00:00.000 good morning everybody and welcome to coffee with Scott Adams the highlight of
00:00:10.500 human civilization and you're lucky to be here but if you'd like to take this
00:00:15.720 experience to levels that your body can't even understand and your brain
00:00:19.200 could not fathom all you need is a cup or a mug or a glass a tank or gels or
00:00:25.120 stein a canteen jug or flask a vessel of any kind fill it with your favorite
00:00:30.000 liquid I like coffee and join me now for the unparalleled pleasure the dopamine
00:00:36.160 of the day the thing that makes everything better it's called the
00:00:39.960 simultaneous sip go
00:00:43.500 well in science news remember all that that worry you had about your
00:00:59.280 cholesterol it turns out that's all bullshit I don't quite understand the
00:01:07.440 study but there's some study out that strongly suggests there's no link between
00:01:12.540 cholesterol and heart disease do you believe that now I I think I've
00:01:19.140 assumed that for a long time I'm not sure the study is accurate maybe some other
00:01:24.300 study will overturn it and I'm not and some people are saying the study is being
00:01:28.260 misread it doesn't really say that or maybe it maybe it's a short term versus
00:01:33.480 a long term maybe there weren't enough people in it maybe the design of the test
00:01:37.740 study was wrong so we don't know for sure but what I do know for sure is it's
00:01:44.340 not for sure the cholesterol is destroying your heart it might be just some kind of
00:01:50.040 inflammation so I don't know what's true there and don't get your medical advice
00:01:57.340 from cartoonists so talk to your doctor don't talk to me well Argentina got their new president Javier
00:02:06.940 Nudu and the first thing he did was cut the government from 21 departments down to nine
00:02:12.720 did he really do that that's not even possible did it did he tell them it's their last day they just
00:02:21.820 walked away or did they say you've got you know a year to wind things up how exactly did he do it
00:02:28.560 you know when you watched what happened at Twitter
00:02:35.160 it is there anybody who doubts the fact that Twitter had too many employees right when Musk cut 80%
00:02:46.140 of the staff how many of you said oh no there's no way it can operate if you've got 80% of the staff
00:02:52.860 do you know who didn't think that would be a bad idea there was a class of Americans who knew that
00:03:00.900 would be fine well what was that class of Americans who knew it would be fine we've got 80% of the staff
00:03:07.040 everybody who ever worked in corporate America am I right everybody who had business experience
00:03:14.660 said you know what I think that could work and everybody who was a journalist who did not have much
00:03:22.740 business experience said well how could it possibly work if you take 80% of the foundation out of the
00:03:29.540 building how's it going to stay up that must be fall over right and meanwhile everybody with business
00:03:37.960 experience said huh I'll bet that'll work and what has happened to the X platform since then
00:03:47.600 probably the fastest pace of useful development I've ever seen in my life
00:03:54.640 why were they so fast lots of reasons you know good leadership probably good employees
00:04:02.780 but they didn't have the other 80% getting in the way and and the things that they did could
00:04:08.780 actually make a difference and they're probably well paid so it's not like magic you know it's not
00:04:15.320 like there's some secret process that only one person knows it's kind of basic stuff get the garbage out of
00:04:21.460 the way get good people give them a reason to live so here's what I wonder about Argentina and
00:04:28.020 uh Javier Miru going from 21 departments down to nine by the time we have our election a year from now
00:04:37.080 we're gonna know if that worked just think about that yeah in 11 months we'll know if the Argentina thing
00:04:47.920 worked what if it does what if it works
00:04:53.600 I can't think of a better argument for electing a Republican
00:04:59.780 I mean if that works it's going to be hard to ignore
00:05:03.400 right because Republicans want to do they want to do the minor version of that you know getting
00:05:08.460 rid of several departments but it's going to be hard to argue with getting rid of the
00:05:14.680 Department of Education if Argentina gets goes from 21 departments down to nine and everything's fine
00:05:22.740 yeah so Vivek had a plan which honestly even to my ears sounded a little bit too much
00:05:31.980 when I would hear Vivek talk about it I thought I don't know if he can get all that done
00:05:37.560 maybe when it comes right down to it you wouldn't really get rid of the departments maybe trim them a
00:05:45.520 little bit or something but now when I see Milieu Milieu is it Milieu or Milieu I don't know whatever
00:05:53.260 whatever it is uh when I watch him try to do this we're actually going to have an answer of whether it
00:05:59.340 works you know sort of in the general sense but also it completely changes my view of Vivek's
00:06:07.280 take on this he Vivek went from outside the normal and be thinking I don't know if you can get all that
00:06:15.380 done you're right in the middle like you went from outside the the zone of oh that's not practical
00:06:23.360 to right in the middle of it as long as it works in Argentina it's definitely going to happen here
00:06:29.340 there's no way you can ignore it if it works there well speaking of Vivek he was on a spaces event
00:06:37.500 last night maybe some of you heard so it's the most classic thing that you talk about in public
00:06:48.660 speaking the single most classic joke that people make is somebody forgetting they have a microphone on
00:06:55.780 and then using the restroom in the middle of an event well that happened so Vivek was joining uh Elon Musk and
00:07:06.340 uh uh Alex Jones was there and uh Vivek I guess he uh took a little uh bathroom break
00:07:17.260 and his mic was on and all I've got to say about it is that man knows how to make a live stream
00:07:25.780 that's all I have to say about that there's nothing else to say and we're done next topic
00:07:38.980 over at open AI which has turned into a soap opera as well as a technology company uh one of the founders
00:07:45.580 co-founders uh Ilya uh since kever has not been seen uh he's not he's not visible to company for quite a
00:07:55.620 quite a time now what do you think is happening with one of the co-founders of open AI during the most
00:08:02.980 exciting time of their history why would he be missing in action what could possibly be going on
00:08:12.500 well let me ask you this he just created a company that's worth 90 billion dollars
00:08:18.180 and he's the the head you know expert you know he's not just the ceo he's like the technology guy
00:08:28.260 how much do you think he could ask for in salary
00:08:33.460 if he jumped ship try to imagine what Elon Musk would pay him
00:08:41.060 just just put that number in your head but what's his actual market value
00:08:48.180 don't you wonder about that like if if you and I went to get a job in corporate America
00:08:53.300 you know if I went back to work in corporate America like what what could I command in my salary
00:08:59.220 I'd like to think I could get a six-digit salary if I went back to corporate America
00:09:05.620 he might be worth a billion dollars
00:09:07.300 he might be the first employee in the history of civilization
00:09:17.380 who if you heard that his annual salary was a billion dollars you'd say to yourself that sounds about right
00:09:24.500 and I apologize to Elon Musk if he's negotiating with him now
00:09:28.580 because that's not going to help Elon at all not at all sorry
00:09:31.940 no he's not going to get a billion dollars but I wouldn't be surprised if he got stock options
00:09:39.140 that were worth a billion dollars in in a hypothetical if things go well sense wouldn't be surprised
00:09:45.780 I think he could actually command a billion dollars in compensation we'll see
00:09:51.780 what I don't know is how many people have gotten up to speed to where he is now so I don't know how
00:09:58.180 special he is obviously he was quite singular up until now but I wonder if that's still the case
00:10:06.500 all right um I keep saying that somebody needs to compile a master list of all the lost government
00:10:11.540 documents how many stories have you heard where oh those those emails were destroyed uh yeah it was a
00:10:20.580 mistake and uh oh you want those videos from January 6th oh I lost those yeah and now we hear that the
00:10:28.580 secret service has lost all of their messages around January 6th and it was a big accident it was just a
00:10:35.940 big mistake because there was there was a technology migration and you know the first thing you do when
00:10:41.540 there's a technology migration I think you all know this right well if you haven't been involved in a
00:10:47.540 technology migration the first thing you do is delete important files from the old system
00:10:53.860 no you don't do that the most important thing you do is preserve the old system
00:11:02.980 rule number one don't lose anything from the old system
00:11:08.820 don't lose anything from the old system until you're really sure you you don't need it but they lost it
00:11:15.060 huh well the head of the secret service is a known uh democrat loved operative uh was tight with
00:11:25.860 dick cheney and biden and now now she's head of the uh secret service and says it's a damn shame all
00:11:33.460 those very very necessary documents they just got lost data migration things happen
00:11:40.500 things happen in migrations what are you going to do
00:11:45.220 so I said to myself Scott this will be the day that AI becomes useful
00:11:52.580 I said whoa I don't want to go and you know do google searches and try to find all the recent
00:11:59.860 stories about lost documents and deleted documents and can't find the documents or won't give you the
00:12:05.220 documents or it's uh it's redacted you know I thought must be a lot of those stories but guess what
00:12:13.300 so I go over to Grok and I say Grok find me all the stories in the last seven years
00:12:20.660 where the documents have been lost or unavailable and I gave a bunch of words for unavailable you know
00:12:27.780 I said look for text messages and emails and legal documents and anything that the government said
00:12:34.100 you know is unavailable and it came back and it said well uh there was a president trump
00:12:42.740 who wouldn't give back his documents at mar-a-lago
00:12:49.380 he gave me three examples I think two of them were about trump not giving documents back
00:12:57.620 so let me just say Grok is not where we want it to be
00:13:02.340 but to be fair it's it's you know first release so I'm not going to judge I'm not going to judge Grok
00:13:09.700 until at least gets parity with the other services so I do appreciate I very much appreciate
00:13:16.420 that musk puts it out before it's you know completely diamond hard uh because I like that as
00:13:23.700 a process I like that he puts it out there it gets responses you know that they can they can fix it
00:13:29.860 based on responses and stuff so I'm not going to judge it yet but it wasn't useful for that so I
00:13:35.620 said to myself well I don't have to settle for Grok which is some people say it's like GPT
00:13:42.420 3.5 only I'll go to 4.0 I'll go to chat GPT so I went to chat GPT and said find me all the instances of
00:13:51.300 the government specifically the government saying those documents are gone I gave it a long super
00:13:58.020 prompt you know what it told me that's too hard it's too hard to get that
00:14:03.940 it's a search it's basically a google search I just wanted it to do it for me instead of me having to
00:14:12.900 google every single you know search term so it was too hard yeah much too hard so there's your update
00:14:20.020 on the usefulness of AI not much here's another one ask it to list the major political hoaxes of
00:14:30.420 the last seven years do you think it will do it oh no not even close why is that I don't know exactly
00:14:40.100 why that is it seems like exactly the sort of thing it could do but not even close yeah so certainly
00:14:49.620 AI is not going to be revealing truth to us if you thought that was going to happen well today we hear
00:14:56.420 that Hillary Clinton is going to get more involved in the Biden campaign and by getting more involved
00:15:03.300 in the Biden campaign if you read between the the words here let me let's try to read between the lines
00:15:11.300 okay okay it's coming into view now all right the top level is Hillary plans to get more involved in 1.00
00:15:17.220 the Biden campaign but if you squint just right if you hold it at an angle you can read between the lines
00:15:22.260 it says uh probably will smother him with a pillow smother him with a pillow just reading between the
00:15:30.580 lines yeah you got it you got to go beyond the surface you got it you got to do your own research
00:15:36.740 and dig down yeah smothered with a pillow um there's evidence that she's already purchased it from oh
00:15:44.420 Mike Lindell uh this is just messed up yeah she's going to buy her pillow from Mike Lindell and frame him for 0.93
00:15:52.900 for smothering Biden with the pillow there's also evidence that she's going to remove Biden's shoes 0.97
00:15:59.380 and put oh this is messed up she's going to put Mike Lindell's slippers on smother him with a my pillow and 0.96
00:16:05.460 then frame him for the whole thing that yeah I know it's true I asked AI AI says this is true
00:16:14.900 no I'm making all that up except it'll probably happen
00:16:20.500 well Trump says he will not testify at his civil fraud trial
00:16:25.060 because there's nothing to say is that the right choice
00:16:27.860 yes
00:16:33.700 yeah there's some things you can't say yes hard enough to
00:16:37.700 right it's not just yes and it's not just hell
00:16:40.820 yes it's like let me demonstrate the proper way to say yes to this
00:16:46.260 Scott you think uh Trump should uh decline the offer to testify at his own uh civil fraud trial
00:16:55.300 yes yes yes yes yeah that's that's the proper yes
00:17:01.860 so yeah that's good because I think what's happened since the banker said it's no big deal
00:17:08.420 and the real estate evaluation guy said it's undervalued there's nothing for Trump to add
00:17:17.620 nothing to add just get him off get him off of that risk and so he's smart so he's not doing that
00:17:26.580 all right so as you know Alex Jones was reinstated on the x platform
00:17:31.860 and uh one entity that's not too happy about it is the washington post
00:17:39.060 they say it's likely like in a opinion piece it's likely to hasten the flight of advertisers
00:17:44.980 from the site over anti-semitism and hateful content huh Alex Jones
00:17:54.340 anti-semitism and hateful content can somebody give me a fact check
00:18:00.260 I don't believe Alex Jones has ever even been accused of anti-semitism am I wrong
00:18:08.100 I don't think that's even better in the conversation I don't remember anything like that
00:18:13.860 right how about uh hate uh hateful content has Alex Jones ever been accused of hateful content
00:18:23.860 certainly you know with the uh whatever it is the school shooting case certainly he was wrong
00:18:31.860 and there's an argument that people were damaged by being wrong but do you think he did that end of
00:18:37.140 hate what was there some hate for children or family no there was no hate that there was simply
00:18:44.020 something he may have thought was true that turned out not to be true and he you know he doesn't say
00:18:50.900 it was true now he just says something got into him basically so the washington post is selling fake
00:19:00.260 news about Alex Jones while complaining that he's a source of fake news and the washington post is the
00:19:09.460 most disgraced uh known purveyor of fake news in the american history at least of ones that pretended to be
00:19:20.020 legitimate yeah uh there were other you know i'm not talking about tabloids in the past in the past
00:19:25.940 tabloids just made stuff up but the uh of the of the entities that pretend to be legitimate
00:19:32.500 the washington toast is washington toast oh the washington toast that just came out
00:19:40.580 from now on i'm going to call them the washington toast
00:19:43.140 those are totally burnt yeah so the washington toast anyway it's ironic that the washington toast
00:19:52.100 would be making fun of uh Alex Jones as you know i created the uh the hoax quiz that i bring out
00:20:02.020 every now and then especially when there's a new one but i realized it was getting too large
00:20:09.540 i wanted it to look impressive to show how many hoaxes there are but it worked against me
00:20:15.380 because when it gets too big people just sort of ignore the whole thing it's like yeah yeah that's
00:20:20.340 a lot of stuff i don't want to look into it so i uh tightened it up to seven the top seven hoaxes
00:20:26.500 that shaped modern america you like that title the top seven hoaxes that shaped modern america
00:20:35.220 i would invite any journalists who would like to follow up on this um you're welcome to use my
00:20:42.420 framing and to use me as one reference in your story if you'd like to follow up on this so i'm not
00:20:49.620 going to write the story i thought about it writing an article around it but uh i thought the tweet did it
00:20:56.100 fear of the top seven and i say they shaped modern america um and what i mean is
00:21:05.940 what i mean is they mattered there were lots of hoaxes but in the end they didn't matter
00:21:12.260 right like uh trump uh overfed the koi fish all right that was a hoax yeah it didn't matter
00:21:20.020 covington kids covington kids it was a hoax it didn't make much difference i mean not really
00:21:28.660 but here are the ones that did number one the fine people hoax number two because the fine people hoax
00:21:34.980 literally got i mean the fine people hoax gave us everything everything bad came from that hoax
00:21:42.020 um including biden the drinking bleach hoax um the russia collusion hoax the january 6th was an
00:21:52.980 insurrection hoax the derek chauvin murdered george floyd hoax the shadow banning isn't real hoax
00:22:02.100 remember when they told us shadow banning isn't real uh and then i'm going to add the climate models
00:22:07.220 predict the future which is different from saying climate change is or is not a risk i'm just saying
00:22:14.500 that it's a hoax that models can predict that now i left out think about the ones i left out
00:22:23.140 i left out the laptop hoax i personally don't think it would change the election
00:22:30.580 that's just my feeling so yes i mean it's often talked about as being a big deal but i don't know
00:22:36.340 if it's in the top seven it's in the top ten but ten is too much i'm trying to keep it tight so you
00:22:45.540 could argue about what should be on this list but i thought it would help to try to get the concentration
00:22:50.820 to get the conversation concentrated on the ones that made it might have made a difference you know
00:22:55.380 give or take one or two all right here's some new news that should have seen but i did not
00:23:03.380 not did you know that in big political events it's not uncommon to hire a big international pr firm
00:23:13.380 and the big international pr firm already has connections with big publications because big
00:23:19.460 publications rely on pr firms because pr firms had no stuff and have connection to their clients
00:23:25.780 that the news would like to have so there it's a friendly situation with pr people at the highest
00:23:33.300 level the the smaller pr people are just bugging the publications but at the highest level they're
00:23:38.500 their buddies so mike benz is talking about uh the situation uh there's a big pr firm called edelman
00:23:49.780 uh and there's somebody named uh an apple bomb who's a who's on the board of directors for the most
00:23:59.540 notorious cia cutout in all of u.s history and uh that's somehow connected to this big pr firm and ways
00:24:09.140 that are hard for me to understand anyway apple bomb run at atlantic hippies and uh according to uh mike benz
00:24:20.740 she got a red red she got caught red-handed serving as a secret quote inner cluster cell 0.86
00:24:28.340 member of a busted british intelligence op set up for covert censorship and political warfare operations
00:24:36.260 known as the integrity initiative but whenever the government has a uh an entity with a big name
00:24:43.300 it's just the cia it's like the integrity initiative the misinformation global initiative it's just
00:24:52.180 basically always the cia or british intelligence or some intelligence group all right so apparently what
00:24:58.500 these so-called clusters were uh they were journalists politicians military academic and business leaders
00:25:06.580 that that basically were networked in kind of a rico way so that a a pr firm or the intelligence
00:25:14.820 industries can activate them and suddenly the journalists and the the pundits and everybody
00:25:20.980 starts talking about the same thing so while you thought hey it almost seems as if the fake news
00:25:27.940 is coordinated it was coordinated it was coordinated it was exactly coordinated and they had a whole
00:25:35.540 structure to do it so so you always wonder hey how is it that they're all like instantly on the same
00:25:42.180 side in these situations it's coordinated yeah it's exactly what you thought it was all right um and
00:25:51.380 that's an organized online influence campaign now this this is uh talking about the uk but presumably this
00:25:59.780 this entity or this situation or this setup exists for american issues as well i did a really bad job of
00:26:06.420 explaining it because it was complicated and i just had time to skim it before i came up
00:26:10.980 i very much recommend that you follow mike bends on x bends as in mercedes bends same spelling he'll pop
00:26:20.660 right up if you look for him but his his understanding of who the players are is the most important thing
00:26:27.700 to understand about the news let me say it again if all you know is what the news is you don't know
00:26:34.660 anything you're literally blind even if it's accurate because if you don't know who's pushing that
00:26:41.940 narrative of the news you know and what they're leaving out and what they're up to you don't
00:26:47.220 understand why you're seeing what you're saying but now that you know that there's an entire layer of
00:26:52.020 organized misinformation people who work for intel groups you know that what you're seeing is an intel
00:26:59.380 fabrication for anything important so the news pretty much is fabricated anytime it matters when
00:27:07.940 it doesn't matter if it's just a celebrity thing if it's just a story about a celebrity it's not
00:27:13.380 fabricated by the government it's just wrong because the news gets everything wrong there's no news about
00:27:19.140 public figures that's correct but not for the same reason the reason the news about public fingers is
00:27:25.140 always incorrect is that the news doesn't know the real news usually the only person who knows is the
00:27:30.660 public figure maybe a spouse or something nobody else knows what the whole story is
00:27:37.780 so the news is completely artificial but for different reasons all right so i'm feeling sorry a little
00:27:44.340 bit for the president of harvard who not only is getting hammered for what some say many say is the
00:27:52.500 inadequate answer to the bullying of the jewish students on harvard's campus and so there are
00:28:00.420 calls for her to be removed bill ackman is sort of leading that charge famous investor bill ackman
00:28:06.260 and let me let me say this about bill ackman
00:28:12.420 don't let me ever make him angry at me if it looks like i'm heading in that direction
00:28:17.700 would you just grab me and pull me back because damn i do not want him spending his entire day 0.90
00:28:26.020 trying to take me out he works all day long i don't know how much he's working on investing lately
00:28:33.540 but he's working all day long and setting things right now i i'm completely on his side
00:28:38.260 uh in terms of he's got a point to be made um but ma'am it's it's an interesting dynamic to watch
00:28:48.340 an investor take down free college heads uh because they should be i think their answers were firing
00:28:56.580 offenses in my opinion although i agree with glenn greenwald who says that we're we're definitely
00:29:03.700 treading on the free speech rights of a lot of these people that's really happening but that
00:29:10.820 doesn't mean that the um that the presidents of these colleges gave good answers they're they're
00:29:18.340 definitely protecting a bad influence so so here's what's happening so the attacks against claudine
00:29:28.020 gay the president of barbara intensifying has now extended to claims that she got tenured based on
00:29:35.300 plagiarized articles and debunked studies i think what happened if i saw it correctly
00:29:44.020 was she referred to somebody else's studies and the other person their studies were faked or
00:29:50.740 wrong so uh i don't i don't have an opinion yet on how valid the claims are but they're out there
00:30:01.700 so the the important thing to know is it's out there um and that people are saying out loud and in
00:30:08.900 public that she's a diversity hire that's the sort of thing people didn't say so loud a little while
00:30:15.540 ago but now they just you can just say it out loud basically um i don't know if that's the case in her
00:30:22.180 case that she's just a diversity hire i would i would say how would i know how do i know what her real
00:30:29.220 qualifications are i don't so i'm not going to say that i would say that it looks exactly like
00:30:35.940 and in our world if it looks like it that ends up being the reality but i don't know if it's real
00:30:40.980 reality so she might be really smart don't know uh well i assume she's really smart anyway 1.00
00:30:50.180 well here's the uh here's the most predictable outcome i love this a series of two tweets
00:31:02.180 um the first one was that uh this one came from uh colin wright so he's he's a gentleman on
00:31:10.820 the x platform and uh when this plagiarism thing came up he tweeted this i'm sure any moment now
00:31:18.660 someone from the and he makes this up the critical plagiarism studies department will explain to us
00:31:25.060 how plagiarism is an oppressive social construct imposed by white western settler colonists
00:31:33.140 colonists really you should say and that we all need to acknowledge and embrace other ways of citing things
00:31:41.620 now that's pretty funny isn't it that if a uh if a prominent black woman the president of harvard 1.00
00:31:48.900 gets accused of plagiarism you know sort of a joke ha ha ha you know pretty soon somebody's going to
00:31:54.820 say plagiarism is okay if you're black well uh there's an assistant professor at the university of
00:32:04.100 cincinnati who writes in an article that anti-plagiarism policies harm black and latinx students
00:32:14.340 it actually happened
00:32:17.940 it's a real thing somebody actually said that it's unfair to accuse black people and hispanic people
00:32:28.020 of plagiarism and that maybe it'd be okay to blame white people but not black and latina latinx people
00:32:38.660 now i'm not going to read you the article or tell you where it appeared because i don't want to even
00:32:42.180 give it that much credit but it's kind of funny that it exists does this look a little like jumping
00:32:48.820 the shark shark here's here's fonzie yeah that's that's kind of kind of taking it to the full joke
00:32:58.660 level now remember i told you that we reach a point where the real news sounds like a joke you just
00:33:07.220 can't tell the difference this is real news and it matched exactly the joke and the joke came even
00:33:15.540 before the real news well i don't know about the timing but he didn't know about this when he did the
00:33:20.500 joke version the the actual article says latinx
00:33:28.660 apparently the assistant professor at the university of cincinnata used used that term in the headline
00:33:36.420 all right um there's a meme going around that i reposted that i believe one year ago i would not
00:33:44.020 have reposted and one year ago maybe you wouldn't even see it because it would get you know shadow
00:33:51.220 banned here's what the meme says uh it's a meme about uh dei and it's defining it says
00:33:58.580 diversity means fewer white people inclusion means exclusion of white people and equity means
00:34:06.500 the stealing from white people 0.60
00:34:10.820 is that unfair is that inaccurate it's a reframe but it's 100 accurate
00:34:19.380 yeah it is simply a different way of describing the exact same stuff but a year ago a year ago i
00:34:26.180 couldn't have said that out loud would you agree i don't think i would have but at the moment it's
00:34:33.460 now obvious to everybody you know how obvious it is that dei is all bad
00:34:42.420 cnn's farid zakaria just went all in against dei at colleges specifically but it the same thing applies to
00:34:53.380 everything else but he went in and he basically said the dei has destroyed the colleges just flat out
00:35:00.580 he didn't hold back a bit there was not one part of him that gave it a little bit of credibility
00:35:06.740 he basically said in a major piece on the middle of you know a good time zone on cnn
00:35:14.740 he just said see ci is or dei is dangerous and that just stood there as an opinion that cnn
00:35:25.540 is not you don't see i'll bet you won't see the other people debate it
00:35:29.620 do you think on another show on cnn somebody's going to say he went too far
00:35:35.140 that not it looks to me like cnn's on board with this as a company so now you have the entire
00:35:43.300 uh right leaning world saying dei has to die it has to it has to go and then cnn just is on the
00:35:52.500 same page at least with farid which i would assume is a more widespread opinion i don't know
00:36:00.180 i'm pretty sure it is i'll bet you
00:36:02.580 and here's what i have to say about uh about that i've told you before that design is destiny right
00:36:14.980 if you design something that guarantees a certain output why would you be surprised if you got that
00:36:21.220 output but here's what's wrong with the design of dei right so let's say that the ideas of dei
00:36:29.700 if not taken to the ridiculous are solid i agree with them i i think that all things being equal
00:36:39.060 as long as you're serving your shareholders and serving you know the larger community it would be
00:36:44.740 nice all things being equal if you could get more diversity more equity and more inclusion
00:36:51.380 that would be a good sort of goal for the world but as you know uh lots of goals conflict with other
00:37:00.420 goals and you can't have everything without giving up something somewhere else now suppose you take
00:37:06.340 those competing objectives and you put them in the brain of one hiring manager right so you're a hiring
00:37:14.500 manager and now it's your job to take care of the stockholders you're trying to take care of your
00:37:19.700 own career you try to take care of the employees you already have you're trying to take care of your
00:37:25.380 customers and you also care about the world because you're a good person and you say to yourself you know
00:37:32.020 what all things being equal i would like to have more diversity that'd be good but i don't want to trade
00:37:37.780 off too much i don't want to screw the stockholders i don't want to screw my employees i don't want to
00:37:43.540 screw me but balancing all these objectives i'll see what i can do now that's what i call a good system
00:37:54.340 because within that one brain are all the competing impulses and then the one person can weigh them
00:38:01.780 and evaluate them as one individual now is that a perfect system no no because that individual could
00:38:09.940 be a racist or that individual could be the opposite you know a reverse racist so that's that's not ideal
00:38:18.180 you could you could see easily why people would look for an alternative to that because it wasn't
00:38:23.700 wasn't maybe doing enough people would say but i'm only going to propose that putting all of it
00:38:31.380 into one decision makers head is your best situation even with all the obvious flaws so here's what
00:38:39.300 they did instead they created a dei department or maybe just one dei director once you've created
00:38:48.580 that system that's a different system than all the competing things happening within one person's brain
00:38:54.500 now you've got a separate entity but here's the the flaw the ceo can't ignore that entity
00:39:01.380 the ceo cannot say oh the dei say say we've got to do x but the ceo does not have the freedom
00:39:10.020 to say you know what i'm going to weigh that against my profitability the the well-being of the
00:39:16.420 you know the customers and everybody else the ceo has to say oh shit if i ignore the dei and somebody
00:39:25.540 finds out the board is going to remove me right so you end up with this power imbalance where the ceo
00:39:33.940 is the one who should be balancing all the competing interests but can't you take from the ceo the ability
00:39:40.340 to balance interests and you sort of blackmail them because they've got a reputation to protect you sort of
00:39:48.180 blackmail them into doing what the dei group wants that's a design problem the design of making the dei
00:39:56.100 group sort of a sacred protected class gives them too much power over the decision maker because they
00:40:03.060 can take the decision maker down reputationally that is a poorly designed system what you should predict
00:40:11.380 in a poorly designed system of that nature is that the entire enterprise would be destroyed
00:40:19.140 because the impulse of the dei people are to bring in people primarily who will achieve the objective
00:40:27.060 of the director of dei which is that more equity and diversity but do you think that person is going
00:40:33.940 to weigh that against profitability no because their own profitability is going to be based on how much
00:40:41.300 more diversity you have next year that's all they care about that the dei person is not going to be
00:40:47.300 directly or immediately blamed if some employee makes a mistake five years down the road that
00:40:53.700 is because they weren't qualified that's not going to come back to that dei person i mean not directly
00:40:59.620 and not on in time but they definitely are going to have to answer for why there's not more diversity
00:41:04.900 next year so so you have this incentive system that's completely on a whack with what it is you're
00:41:12.020 trying to accomplish because what you're trying to accomplish is a strong company that's doing the best
00:41:17.700 they can on these other social issues which do have weight and importance so all i'm introducing to the
00:41:27.060 argument is that you have two systems that we know of one is where one person has to balance all the
00:41:33.700 things and then you don't really get the level of equity diversity that some people think is essential
00:41:42.660 but you also preserve the entities right it's an imperfect system but at least the government still works
00:41:50.660 at least the company still makes money at least disney still makes good movies am i right
00:41:57.460 but as soon as the you know the dei people get involved disney can't even make a good movie
00:42:03.940 do you think that the the head of ceo of disney do you think that he can make decisions completely
00:42:12.100 independent of the objections of his own dei department kind of not kind of not yeah bob eiger
00:42:21.460 yeah so it's a design problem and if you don't see it as that you're going to see it as racism or
00:42:30.420 something right if you're going down the is it racism or you know who's who's discriminating
00:42:37.380 against who it's it's the wrong conversation it's not even a good conversation the real conversation is
00:42:43.620 it's an engineering problem did you design an organization to fail as soon as you put in the
00:42:51.860 dei group as a separate group that are that are evaluated separately and they have control over the
00:42:58.660 top that's a guaranteed failure it guarantees you'll take energy away from profitability and move it toward
00:43:06.100 something that's not profitability so that's the end of you or credibility
00:43:13.780 all right so just know that
00:43:22.980 so
00:43:25.540 i saw a weird post from nilon musk on evolution and entropy did anybody see that
00:43:32.500 it took me a while to figure out what that was all about still don't know exactly but here's what
00:43:39.780 he said so he says evolution and entropy and then space next line there are lies there are damn lies
00:43:49.380 and then there are statistical mechanics now you know this is a a play on statistics you know being
00:43:57.140 worse than lies but the statistical mechanics um seems to be a sort of a third branch of physics
00:44:06.740 in which they're trying to predict the action of the smallest entities and how that sums up i guess
00:44:13.540 and i don't know exactly what context he's making this comment but
00:44:19.540 do you believe that there is a uh any part of science is going to be using their statistical
00:44:27.460 mechanics to predict the future
00:44:33.140 basically i don't know anything about this topic
00:44:36.420 but i'm willing to say that musk is right because what he's referring to is something that
00:44:41.700 is sufficiently complicated that whoever is getting paid to work on it
00:44:46.180 is probably hiding in the complexity and getting a paycheck of doing some papers and stuff
00:44:52.900 while maybe not even believing that any of it's real or useful in the real world because it's
00:44:58.260 complicated and nobody can predict the future with math you know unless it's something like simple like gravity
00:45:07.620 all right um it looks like uh hamas has solved the ukraine war problem
00:45:13.300 uh or maybe trump has but it turns out there's a report that uh zelensky's uh well he announced
00:45:22.020 it he's gonna have peace talks in switzerland uh on the sidelines at the world economic forum
00:45:29.460 see you thought that the world economic forum was useless but it's a way to get zelensky to talk to 0.97
00:45:34.900 the swiss i guess since he's going to be there
00:45:37.860 so here's how i interpret that number one if hamas and not attacked israel
00:45:45.300 it's far more likely that the u.s would be all in on funding and maybe not looking for peace
00:45:52.580 is that is that too strong do you think those two things are are connected in that way
00:45:58.980 because it's really a stretch to get americans to fund a war that they don't quite see
00:46:05.460 exactly how it's helping us but then when we sail our our fleet you know next to a second war
00:46:13.540 and you know we're involved on some level but not boots on the ground but you're still
00:46:17.860 uncomfortable about the funding and the involvement i feel as if hamas made it far more likely 0.65
00:46:25.780 that zelensky would have to you know look for a peace solution because he can't afford war
00:46:31.700 so is that would you agree that those are connected or is that too much of a stretch
00:46:38.820 i i feel they're psychologically connected in american minds all right but here's the other factor
00:46:47.620 you've heard me predict this before the democrats and biden in particular cannot
00:46:55.380 allow this war the ukraine war to still be raging on election day
00:47:01.700 do you agree that that they're at a level of complete desperation because if trump takes over
00:47:10.740 when the let's say the lines you know the front lines haven't changed much in over a year
00:47:17.780 how easy would it be for trump to end a war where there's no more funding neither side wants to fight
00:47:24.420 the you know the way it will be settled will be obvious and and trump's not the one responsible
00:47:30.820 for starting in the first place he would just be the one responsible for ending it it would be the
00:47:36.260 easiest war anybody ever ended i could do it that's i'm not even exaggerating i'd be a terrible president
00:47:43.860 don't vote for me for president but give me one day in the job and i can end the fucking ukraine war 0.99
00:47:49.060 you know else who else could end the ukraine war in one day besides trump you could yeah every one of
00:47:57.620 you every one of you you just have to say this is what's going to happen i'm the president of the
00:48:03.300 united states this is over that you guys come here this is over this is basically what it's going to
00:48:10.260 look like you guys work out the details but it's over we're done trump could do that tomorrow so
00:48:18.580 there will be a desperation from democrats to get this solved which guarantees it gets all so in a way
00:48:28.980 trump has already ended the war in ukraine
00:48:34.020 i don't think that's too far i i believe that the existence of trump
00:48:38.820 as a guaranteed war ender like there's no question about it really he would end it really quickly
00:48:45.300 you know before when he said that i think it was reasonable to say he's exaggerating
00:48:50.500 because you still thought well maybe there could be some change in the front lines
00:48:54.900 and maybe that something would change it's too soon to say that but today no doubt about it
00:49:02.180 it's not even it wouldn't even take any trump superpower deal making it would just take
00:49:07.460 somebody to try basically so yeah that's a big problem for the demons
00:49:14.900 yeah what else is going on here
00:49:18.820 um
00:49:21.220 well that's about it that's about it did i miss anything
00:49:24.820 any news that i forgot to mention
00:49:33.460 yeah ukraine's running out of ammo everybody's
00:49:37.780 talking for a press secretary would be awesome
00:49:39.860 just let the russians win yes that is scott's response
00:49:48.260 did that sound like just let the russians win
00:49:51.940 or you mean in terms of the current uh boundaries oh yes yes i would let the russians win their current
00:49:57.780 boundaries yeah yeah i'm saying that unambiguously i'm definitely letting them win their current
00:50:03.780 boundaries you know why because ukraine and nato and the united states up we up yeah we basically gave
00:50:13.700 it to them created a situation by design we designed the situation that guaranteed
00:50:20.740 that russia would own those properties because it would become important to them more important
00:50:26.260 now i also don't care does anybody care if russian-speaking pro-russian territories are controlled by russia
00:50:37.780 ukraine is the most corrupt country on earth is russia worse than ukraine 1.00
00:50:43.780 no
00:50:45.300 would russia use that extra power they have in those extra
00:50:49.140 areas to conquer the world no no probably just be a pain in the ass for russia 0.87
00:50:56.260 so no i don't care i have no interest in who owns those
00:51:00.580 pieces of land there's no american strategic interest
00:51:08.660 all right time for putin to go that's the opposite of what's going to happen
00:51:12.820 putin won he's he's as solid as you can get
00:51:19.140 all right
00:51:28.900 death to amas death to terrorism 0.93
00:51:34.500 yeah i imagine putin's popularity will be through the roof
00:51:39.060 yep is vivek staying in the race well as far as we know i mean apparently did not qualify for the
00:51:46.580 next debate but i wouldn't be surprised if he counter programs that successfully
00:51:54.580 so don't be surprised if vivek is doing something to make some news sort of like trump does at the same
00:52:01.220 time that there's a debate
00:52:04.900 you know i would even i would even watch a program where vivek watches the debate with us
00:52:10.580 and then does you know mystery science theater uh kind of comments about how it's going wouldn't you watch that
00:52:21.220 i i would watch him commenting in real time on the debate that'd be fun
00:52:25.780 all right
00:52:33.220 uh security right
00:52:40.180 not according to peter's am i'm being told i don't know what that means i guess the russian situation
00:52:46.420 all right did you see the video which is a jordanian wedding in which the groom was shot
00:52:50.420 good lord why did trump say he was joking about the disinfectant well think it through
00:53:03.620 think it through answer your own question why did trump say he was joking about the disinfectants
00:53:10.420 what what was the alternative tell me the alternative
00:53:18.180 the alternative was for him to double down as light as a disinfectant inside the body do you think he
00:53:25.780 was prepared to do that do you think he felt confident enough that he remembered a tweet he saw three
00:53:32.580 months ago about light being a disinfectant i think he just wanted it to go away so he said that's just
00:53:39.940 joking what would you do what would you do in that situation i think you just try to make it go away
00:53:48.020 and so i think he was just trying to make it go away
00:53:55.540 all right um
00:53:58.580 prediction the fake will go on tim cast during the debate oh that wouldn't be a bad idea
00:54:04.340 yeah we talked about argentina and their departments illuminated um i think we got it all
00:54:15.220 i think we did it all all right for your uh pleasure um i did clip the part of my live stream where i
00:54:23.060 talked about organizing your brain into the executive and the other functions below it um
00:54:30.900 when i did that it's a reframe when i did that live i didn't know how much impact it would have on other
00:54:37.700 people but i immediately got incredible feedback that it changed people's entire outlook on reality
00:54:46.820 basically so i um i put a clip on the locals platform and also shared that i hope i made that
00:54:57.780 oh you know i might have shared it i think i shared it and made it locked at the same time
00:55:02.660 first thing i'll do when i'm done here is i'll make sure it's unlocked so that you can view it
00:55:07.460 because it does seem to be life-changing for some people and uh seven minutes will change your life
00:55:13.940 all right and that is all we have youtube thanks for joining make sure that you buy my book reframe
00:55:20.420 your brain the best actually both of these books the best two gifts you can get if you don't have
00:55:27.380 twenty dollar gifts for somebody in your life thanks for joining youtube see you tomorrow