Real Coffee with Scott Adams - Episode 2336 CWSA 12⧸28⧸23 All The News Fits In A Theme And It Isn't A Good One

00:00:00.000 Doo-doo-doo. Doo-doo-doo-doo. Doo-doo-doo-doo-doo. 0.99

00:00:08.240 Good morning, everybody, and welcome to Coffee with Scott Adams, the highlight of human civilization.

00:00:16.420 Yeah, I'm a little discombobulated. I started an hour early because I read the clock wrong,

00:00:21.920 and then I started late because I stopped looking at the clock. It's that kind of a day,

00:00:26.000 but otherwise it's going to be great. If you'd like to take this experience up to levels that

00:00:32.220 nobody can even understand with their tiny human brains, all you need is a cup or mug or a glass,

00:00:36.760 a tank or chalice or a stein, a canteen jug or a flask, a vessel of any kind. Fill it with your

00:00:42.540 favorite liquid. I like coffee. And join me now for the unparalleled pleasure of the dopamine

00:00:47.640 at the end of the day that makes everything better. It's called the simultaneous sip that happens now.

00:00:56.000 Hmm. Savor it. Savor it.

00:01:02.440 Well, have you heard of Project Lazarus? It's a project to use AI to take over your social media

00:01:12.920 accounts after you die and just keep tweeting, and it will even age your profile picture.

00:01:19.620 That's right. So now if you die, you can still do social media.

00:01:28.160 No problem. But some anonymous person on the project is a little worried that it's taking

00:01:34.940 a dark turn because apparently it's a little bit too good.

00:01:38.820 So now the AI can make a perfect pre-production of you, and it can post things just like you would

00:01:47.820 inside a dark turn. Do you think that people will have ongoing relationships with the deceased?

00:01:58.480 I do. I think people are just going to keep with their partner. I think that people's spouse will pass

00:02:09.420 away, and they're just going to keep living with them. They'll just keep going on. Imagine you're 85,

00:02:16.840 and your life is basically, you walk out of the living room, your spouse is sitting in the chair,

00:02:23.720 drinking some coffee. Maybe you talk a little bit. But basically, you're not going on big trips,

00:02:29.900 and you're not going to the gym. What would be the difference between that and walking into your

00:02:37.300 living room, your TV comes on, it's a perfect reproduction of your spouse who died last year,

00:02:43.520 and it has a conversation with you just like your spouse would have.

00:02:49.400 By that might actually be more interested in your problems than your spouse was.

00:02:54.340 What's going to keep people from just continuing their existing relationship?

00:03:00.840 Now, if you're 25 and your spouse dies, you're going to need some human touch and stuff,

00:03:09.240 so you replace them. I think a lot of people are just going to continue living with the dead,

00:03:14.540 and then eventually they'll port the dead into a robot body and just reproduce their dead ones,

00:03:20.700 their loved ones. I don't know. There might be something important about our ability to let go.

00:03:27.820 What if we lose our need to let go? I don't know. Could be an interesting change. Might not be good.

00:03:35.380 All right. I'm having a comment problem on locals, so I'm going to open up my phone here just to look at their comments on a separate device,

00:03:45.860 which will totally work, which will totally work.

00:03:51.760 Sure. Sure. It'll totally work. No problem.

00:03:56.000 It's totally working. All right.

00:03:59.520 We're all good. I can see all of your comments now.

00:04:01.660 All right. The theme for today's show is all of our systems are designed in America. 0.55

00:04:11.780 All of our systems are designed to promote the least qualified people.

00:04:17.660 Do you think that's a general thing or just sort of a little problem?

00:04:20.580 Well, I'm going to develop the idea that it's everything we're doing.

00:04:27.900 We went from a system that was designed very specifically to promote the most capable people

00:04:35.480 to one which in every way is designed to do the opposite now.

00:04:40.860 What is the obvious outcome of that?

00:04:43.780 There's only one way that ends up.

00:04:46.200 And let me develop that a little bit.

00:04:48.480 Let's take schools.

00:04:49.620 So we have these things called teachers' unions. 0.90

00:04:54.380 Now, the teachers have a little bit different interests than the children and the parents.

00:05:00.540 That's why you have a teachers' union, because the teachers have their own interests

00:05:04.540 that are not identical to their bosses or the people who pay them.

00:05:08.880 So they have to have their own protection.

00:05:11.020 Now, I'm in favor of unions. I like unions.

00:05:14.700 But if you have a union in the context of teaching your children,

00:05:19.620 that is a system designed to maximize the teacher's benefit,

00:05:23.500 and that will be at the cost of the children's capabilities.

00:05:28.120 Now, why don't we have unions in the military? 0.99

00:05:34.680 Does anybody know?

00:05:35.760 Why can't soldiers join a union?

00:05:40.040 All right, it's such a stupid question that you don't even need to answer, right?

00:05:43.680 Like, you don't even have to think about it too much.

00:05:45.920 You're like, a union?

00:05:47.260 If soldiers were in a union, they could just refuse orders and go on a strike.

00:05:52.580 Yeah, obviously.

00:05:53.800 So you would never have a union in a context where your very life depends on it.

00:06:00.420 Everybody understands that, right?

00:06:02.420 If your life depends on it, you don't want to have a union getting in there with their union rules.

00:06:08.480 But what's the difference between our education system and our homeland defense?

00:06:18.680 What's the difference?

00:06:20.260 Well, one of them shoots bullets and blows things up, and the other trains children.

00:06:26.660 But aren't they really the same?

00:06:27.880 Because if you don't train the children, the country will be helpless and will be invaded and will be destroyed.

00:06:38.060 If you do train the children, and they become very competent and capable, then they help your economy improve.

00:06:45.700 And what's the number one thing you need to defend yourself from other countries?

00:06:52.160 Number one thing is money.

00:06:54.180 Because if you have money, you can buy weapons.

00:06:56.720 Look at Ukraine.

00:06:57.880 Right?

00:06:58.900 So the fact that we separate our education system from our military is a logical mistake.

00:07:09.400 We do it because our brains naturally put things in buckets.

00:07:12.600 So we think, oh, we're trading children.

00:07:14.520 That's a different bucket from the military.

00:07:16.500 But it's not.

00:07:18.240 It's a continuum.

00:07:20.440 Training the children to build a good economy, to make them capable to be in the military if they ever need to,

00:07:26.180 make good decisions so you don't have to send your military out.

00:07:30.200 It's all connected.

00:07:32.060 So we have a system called teachers' unions, which guarantee we do not do the best job of teaching our children.

00:07:39.120 Then we've got DEI, diversity, equity, and inclusion, which has infected our colleges, our schools, and our corporations.

00:07:50.620 And now DEI, of course, is well-intentioned, in my opinion, well-intentioned, meaning that the whole point of it is to make the world better.

00:08:01.560 More inclusion, better diversity.

00:08:03.460 As long as things work the same, you get more diversity, you win.

00:08:09.780 It should be a better world.

00:08:11.640 But intentions do not necessarily translate to design.

00:08:16.660 If your design is the opposite of your intention, that's a mistake.

00:08:20.240 And in this case, I think we would all agree that if you focus on diversity and inclusion, and you even have a staff members whose job it is to make sure you do it,

00:08:34.280 you are going to give up capability for diversity.

00:08:39.040 Now, you won't plan to do it.

00:08:41.840 It would not be your intention to do it.

00:08:44.200 But it would be a necessity because of math.

00:08:48.560 If everybody is going after the same pool of diversity, there just won't be enough diverse people who are also qualified for your specific job.

00:08:59.720 So you're pretty much guaranteed that you're going to get lower quality because of DEI.

00:09:08.580 So the teachers' unions guarantee it.

00:09:10.680 The DEI guarantees it.

00:09:11.780 How about our current mass illegal immigration?

00:09:16.100 Is mass illegal immigration going to get you high-quality people compared to vetting people and making sure they add things?

00:09:25.880 No, obviously.

00:09:27.620 You don't even need to answer the question.

00:09:30.720 Obviously, the point of mass immigration is not to increase the capability of the citizens of the United States.

00:09:38.140 It does add labor.

00:09:39.000 And I would say that the second generation of these immigrants could be quite high-quality.

00:09:45.840 I love our second generation.

00:09:48.360 The second generation are pretty awesome.

00:09:50.960 But, you know, it's going to take a while to get there.

00:09:53.620 So if you had enough first generation can't speak English, were not vetted,

00:09:59.400 can't you pretty much guarantee that at least for the next 10 or 20 years,

00:10:04.920 you're going to have lower capability?

00:10:07.260 Would you agree?

00:10:08.060 Which has nothing to do with the natural nature of the immigrants.

00:10:13.160 It's just the system.

00:10:15.420 If the system stops checking people and lets everybody in,

00:10:20.060 you don't get the same, you know, qualified job seekers that you would otherwise.

00:10:27.060 How about our presidential system?

00:10:29.200 Do we have a political system which guarantees the best and the brightest to become your leaders?

00:10:35.440 Well, let me say it this way.

00:10:39.960 No matter how much you love Trump, you've got to agree that if you could get something like his policies without the provocation,

00:10:51.540 you'd probably be in better shape.

00:10:53.140 But here we are.

00:10:56.560 It's going to be Biden versus Trump.

00:10:58.260 Trump, which will make 50% of the country literally insane.

00:11:02.840 And he's your best choice.

00:11:05.960 I do think he's your best choice of the two.

00:11:09.040 Now, I'd still rather a Vivek Ramaswamy.

00:11:12.240 Because he gives you all the goodness without the provocation.

00:11:16.500 So, and he's younger, which matters to me.

00:11:19.640 So, do we have a system that guarantees your best political candidates?

00:11:26.160 Or can you just look at it and say to yourself, it's kind of obvious that's not what the system is doing.

00:11:33.340 Whatever it is that the system is doing is definitely not choosing the best candidates.

00:11:39.240 It's choosing candidates they think they can win in the case of Trump.

00:11:44.000 Candidates that, you know, touch them emotionally, also in the case of Trump.

00:11:47.800 Candidates who just seem safe, or maybe they can control them through blackmail.

00:11:53.660 Maybe Biden.

00:11:54.720 I don't know.

00:11:55.800 Maybe there's some blackmail that's part of the process.

00:11:59.220 Hard to say.

00:12:00.240 But you also can't rule it out.

00:12:03.120 So, that's not good.

00:12:04.200 How about TikTok and smartphones?

00:12:07.020 Are they making us more capable or less capable?

00:12:10.040 Obviously, less.

00:12:12.280 They're making us stupid and it's dividing the country.

00:12:15.260 So, it's making us less capable of being good citizens who can work with each other to good outcomes.

00:12:22.120 Right?

00:12:22.620 And are we changing it?

00:12:23.760 No.

00:12:24.320 No.

00:12:24.620 TikTok's going to continue.

00:12:26.420 Smartphones will continue.

00:12:29.440 And how about our health?

00:12:31.660 Do we have systems that are safeguarding our health?

00:12:35.120 Well, not so much.

00:12:37.480 I would say that our food sources are compromised, meaning that too much sugar, too much God knows what kind of chemicals in our food.

00:12:47.060 And I don't think that that's...

00:12:48.920 If your food is compromised, your physical health is compromised, and it's a straight line to your mental health and your physical capabilities are compromised.

00:13:00.900 So, do we have a food system which is going to promote capability or a food system which is going to promote sickness and poor mental health?

00:13:14.120 Clearly, the food system is making us less capable.

00:13:19.140 How about our...

00:13:20.900 Yeah.

00:13:22.440 All right.

00:13:22.740 So, those are just a few examples.

00:13:25.800 I'll give you some more as we go.

00:13:27.260 But I'm not wrong.

00:13:29.820 I'm not wrong.

00:13:31.400 We sort of drifted accidentally into every one of our major systems that we rely on to be healthy and to have leadership and economics.

00:13:42.160 Every one of them we've polluted with bad ideas that were often well-intentioned.

00:13:50.380 Yeah.

00:13:50.600 So, let me say it again.

00:13:51.480 Again, if you can get diversity for free, I'd be all over it.

00:13:56.240 Of course.

00:13:57.700 Of course.

00:13:58.520 I do want our businesses and our organizations to roughly look like the country.

00:14:05.300 I think that's a good thing.

00:14:07.280 But you don't want to give up too much to buy that.

00:14:11.760 And that's the problem.

00:14:13.180 You might give up too much to get it too quickly.

00:14:15.800 All right.

00:14:18.860 How about...

00:14:20.280 How do people feel about leadership?

00:14:22.600 I would like to see if my audience is so smart that you can get the answer to the question I haven't even asked yet before I ask it.

00:14:36.520 Go.

00:14:37.040 The answer to the question before I ask the question.

00:14:40.080 You don't even know what category this is.

00:14:42.060 That is correct.

00:14:44.480 The answer is 25%.

00:14:46.440 Do you want to hear the question or does it matter?

00:14:50.380 Because you have the answer.

00:14:52.940 Yeah.

00:14:53.060 Well, Rasmussen did a poll and they asked U.S. voters if they believe in their lifetime the overall quality of America's political leaders have gotten worse.

00:15:04.920 75% said yes.

00:15:07.100 In my lifetime, the political leadership has gotten worse.

00:15:11.240 That means 25% of the country has either not noticed it's gotten worse or believes that it's gotten better or declined to answer.

00:15:20.100 Now, how many of you, when you first heard me say that most of our polls have 25% of the respondents have the dumbest fucking answer in the world, just the dumbest answer, it doesn't matter what the poll is, 25%, a good solid 25% are going to give you the dumbest fucking answer you've ever heard in your life.

00:15:46.960 Yeah, I think our leadership's fine.

00:15:48.680 It's doing great.

00:15:49.320 Best I've ever seen.

00:15:53.080 Who sees that?

00:15:55.160 Come on.

00:15:57.180 All right.

00:16:02.220 Oh, I see a question here in the comments on locals.

00:16:05.400 What came first, Trump or the controversy?

00:16:08.860 I would agree that it's not so much Trump who caused his own problems.

00:16:14.440 You know, the Democrats painted Trump in a way that causes the problems.

00:16:19.580 But he is unique in that the way he speaks and acts makes it a little bit easier.

00:16:27.740 If you compare that to the way Vivek speaks and acts, Vivek can say things, and actually he is, we'll talk about that, saying things that are even more provocative than Trump, by far, actually.

00:16:39.920 If you look at what Vivek said just this week, he's way more provocative than Trump.

00:16:45.380 Do you know why it's not a number one news story about all the crazy stuff that Vivek said?

00:16:51.540 Do you know why it's not a news story?

00:16:53.180 Because the left is scared as shit, because he can explain his provocative opinions so well.

00:17:00.900 Trump?

00:17:01.260 Trump speaks like his base.

00:17:06.360 And that's great for, you know, getting them to love you, because he speaks the way they do.

00:17:12.640 Very simple terms.

00:17:14.740 Keep it easy.

00:17:16.040 The wind stops blowing.

00:17:18.000 My TV goes off.

00:17:19.640 Okay, that's not technically accurate, but you get the idea, right?

00:17:24.660 So Trump's more of a, you get the idea.

00:17:28.120 You know what I'm saying.

00:17:29.820 And you feel it.

00:17:31.260 So that's how he communicates.

00:17:32.420 It's very effective.

00:17:34.080 Very effective.

00:17:34.980 But it leaves him open to attack.

00:17:37.360 Because if he's taking the sort of simple emotional truth, and I believe he's close to the truth, even when he's using emotion to persuade.

00:17:47.640 It's very easy to attack from an intellectual perspective, because you say, well, he's not defending that that well.

00:17:54.180 But then you introduce a vague, similar or even more provocative statements, and you do not want to put him on television, on MSNBC, and let the Democrats hear him speak.

00:18:09.960 I'm surprised he's gotten as much play as he has on the left.

00:18:15.940 You know, CNN's had him on a few times, to their credit.

00:18:19.220 So let me give CNN some complete credit.

00:18:24.540 They've had Vivek on, and they'd love him talk.

00:18:28.360 So I'm going to give him credit for that.

00:18:29.760 Anyway, so I just wanted to say that.

00:18:35.080 The Pentagon's effort to crack down on extremism, you know, the extremism, all that white supremacy that was in the military.

00:18:44.900 Well, they looked for it.

00:18:46.580 Man, they studied it.

00:18:47.980 They searched, and they searched for the white supremacy that's ruining the military.

00:18:53.220 And you know what they found after all that searching?

00:18:56.800 It's really no different than the public at large.

00:19:01.280 In other words, it was an illusion.

00:19:03.360 There was never any excess white supremacy in the military.

00:19:09.920 But did they decide that they didn't find it, so they're done?

00:19:13.760 No, no, they're doubling down.

00:19:15.700 They're going to look harder.

00:19:17.420 They're going to look twice as hard now.

00:19:19.820 Now, what do you think happens to the readiness of the military when you start dividing them by, I don't know,

00:19:27.820 I think you might be an extremist or a white supremacist?

00:19:30.360 Well, the DOD, Department of Defense, is starting to feel it might be causing greater feelings of alienation and hostility.

00:19:40.860 So, in other words, the military system, which they implemented, to get rid of white supremacy, which would be what?

00:19:50.000 Well-intentioned.

00:19:51.580 Well-intentioned.

00:19:52.960 I don't want to see any white supremacy in my military.

00:19:56.980 None.

00:19:57.700 I want to see zero white supremacy in my military.

00:20:01.300 None.

00:20:02.400 Good intention.

00:20:03.240 But bad system, as it turns out, there wasn't much there to look for.

00:20:09.860 So, if you've got a system that's causing alienation and division, and it's not finding any problems that it was trying to solve, it makes things worse.

00:20:20.540 So, once again, we have a system that, by its design, will reduce the quality of our military.

00:20:27.060 By its design.

00:20:28.820 So, as long as they're chasing diversity in the military and trying to root out things that don't exist, you don't get a good outcome.

00:20:38.180 Now, you've got your schools are ruined by the teachers' unions.

00:20:42.160 You've got your DEI ruining corporations and the government.

00:20:45.520 You've got mass illegal immigration ruining the capability of people coming in or lowering the average. 1.00

00:20:50.820 You've got your presidential system that gives you a vegetable as the major candidate. 1.00

00:20:56.740 I mean, let's face it.

00:20:57.640 Biden's basically a vegetable at this point.

00:21:00.040 You've got food supply that's making us unhealthy.

00:21:02.920 Smartphones and TikTok that are making us stupid and biased.

00:21:07.060 And a military that's biased design is reducing the quality of the forces.

00:21:16.100 How bad is wokeness? 0.99

00:21:17.540 Well, do you know a publication called Atlantic, which is famous for being super lefty, anti-Republican?

00:21:27.400 Apparently, they allowed a writer, John McWhorter, who I'm pretty sure is black, to write a negative article about Robin DiAngelo's book.

00:21:40.260 What is it?

00:21:43.380 Anti-fragile, right?

00:21:45.680 So, anti-fragile is one of these, you know, woke books.

00:21:51.400 And Atlantic actually ran a piece in which John McWhorter, responding to some criticism of his criticisms, posted this today.

00:22:04.320 Apparently, the author, Robin DiAngelo, said that she was being criticized by somebody who is as right-wing or as conservative as Clarence Thomas and Ben Carson.

00:22:17.120 And what McWhorter says about that, I'm, quote, very conservative, like Clarence Thomas and Ben Carson.

00:22:26.460 She has clearly read barely a word of my work.

00:22:29.880 At least when I slammed her book, I had read every word.

00:22:33.780 And I maintained that, I'm sorry, it was white fragility. 0.98

00:22:37.220 I had the books wrong.

00:22:38.840 What is anti-fragile?

00:22:40.360 Is that somebody else's book?

00:22:43.820 Is that Candy's book?

00:22:44.820 I'm confusing it with some of the book.

00:22:48.040 Oh, anti-fragile is a Talib's book.

00:22:51.420 Yeah, Nassim Talib.

00:22:53.120 All right.

00:22:53.540 So, go back.

00:22:54.780 The book is White Fragility.

00:22:57.180 White Fragility. 0.99

00:22:59.820 And that's sort of a woke book, obviously, an anti-white book. 0.54

00:23:04.320 So, McWhorter says, at least when I slammed her book, you'd read every word of it.

00:23:11.020 And then he goes on and he says that White Fragility is literally the worst book ever written.

00:23:16.660 It's so bad it's an achievement.

00:23:18.380 Just hold this in your head that wokeness has jumped the shark so much that even Atlantic will run a major piece against a book, which is, you know, one of the foundations of wokeness, from a black writer who isn't as conservative as Clarence Thomas and Ben Carson, apparently.

00:23:44.360 But I feel like that's, I feel like the fact that this even happened is telling us something.

00:23:53.720 It's telling us that at least you can say what you're thinking about the topic of wokeness and DEI and all that.

00:24:01.340 And that's an improvement.

00:24:02.480 Because I don't think it was even a year ago you could even speak honestly.

00:24:07.820 You should see the things that Vivek is saying this week.

00:24:11.100 There's not a thing he said this week that you could have even said out loud a couple years ago.

00:24:15.740 You would have been canceled immediately.

00:24:17.960 But now we say, okay, that's actually a pretty good point that you can say that out loud now.

00:24:23.400 Big difference.

00:24:25.920 Well, I don't know what to call him.

00:24:29.580 What do you call a Zuby? 0.99

00:24:34.140 Musician, philosopher.

00:24:39.740 He's impossible to characterize.

00:24:41.720 He has so many skills.

00:24:43.640 You know Zuby?

00:24:45.260 So you might know him from social media.

00:24:47.580 Well, Zuby says that social media is reducing people's social skills and attention spans.

00:24:54.320 And he says that he's been talking to people for, basically his job is, you know, if you could call it a job, it's the best career ever.

00:25:04.380 He goes around, he travels a lot, and he talks to people.

00:25:09.220 He really has the best job.

00:25:11.140 He goes around, he talks to people.

00:25:12.500 And then he creates content that probably influences his music, influences his political opinions and everything else.

00:25:20.780 But he says the average person is less social and less competent post-pandemic, he calls it.

00:25:29.980 Have you noticed that people are less socially capable since the pandemic?

00:25:36.280 How many of you have noticed that change?

00:25:39.840 Because I definitely am.

00:25:42.500 I've said this before, but I completely lost what I would call a social instinct.

00:25:50.860 Do you know what I mean by that?

00:25:52.260 A social instinct?

00:25:54.160 Now, that doesn't mean I'm going to treat people poorly.

00:25:57.260 I hope I have not accidentally done that.

00:26:00.500 But I don't have, like, a drive.

00:26:05.240 And I thought it was just me.

00:26:06.840 So, you know, I've told you before, I can spend two to three days a week without seeing another person in person at all.

00:26:17.420 Not a word of in-person contact, two or three days a week.

00:26:22.240 And for a while, it was bothering me.

00:26:24.280 Because you can feel it's unhealthy.

00:26:26.340 You know, you can just feel it.

00:26:28.280 Like, on your body and your brain.

00:26:30.640 Like, even at 24 hours without talking to another person, you feel a little unhealthy.

00:26:35.460 And then the moment somebody comes into your life, you have, like, any kind of good interaction, you feel healthy.

00:26:43.100 Like, it's just noticeable.

00:26:44.620 But I wonder if the loneliness is what's killing people as much as any other cause of which we could mention many.

00:26:57.580 Because I feel like the loneliness is, like, lethal.

00:27:02.580 Like, not at the level I experience it.

00:27:05.200 But I feel like a little bit more of it could kill me.

00:27:09.220 That's what it feels like.

00:27:10.400 It feels like it could just fucking kill me.

00:27:12.020 But I also get used to it.

00:27:15.620 So I agree with Zuby on that.

00:27:19.680 But at least if you've got all these problems, at least you can go get therapy.

00:27:24.180 Am I right?

00:27:25.860 Thank goodness the system of mental health care in this country is vibrant.

00:27:32.340 And it works every time.

00:27:36.540 Right?

00:27:37.660 Right?

00:27:38.440 No?

00:27:39.700 Well, yes.

00:27:40.460 We don't really have any mental health system for the people who are in the worst shape.

00:27:46.700 But, you know, we know we can't involuntarily put them in institutions.

00:27:52.100 But at least the average people who can afford to go to a therapist, at least they're getting super good service from the therapists who are trained to.

00:28:02.000 What?

00:28:03.060 That's not right?

00:28:05.200 Well, okay.

00:28:06.200 Well, Jonathan Haidt posted this today.

00:28:10.640 He said, I wish I had not resigned from the APA.

00:28:14.260 I guess that must be the Association American Psychologist Association.

00:28:22.200 So it's a group of psychologists.

00:28:24.380 So he wishes he hadn't resigned from it in 2021.

00:28:28.140 Do you know why he wishes he hadn't resigned?

00:28:29.860 So he could do it now.

00:28:33.160 That's right.

00:28:33.880 In your face.

00:28:34.960 He wishes he could resign from them twice.

00:28:37.800 Because they've been infected by wokeness and apparently they're introducing the concept of colonizers into the therapy model so that you can know if the real problem is you've got some bipolar or maybe, you know, maybe a little, some, some.

00:28:57.340 Or are you a victim of colonizers?

00:28:59.760 Is it really a victim, oppressor, oppressor and victim kind of model?

00:29:07.800 So apparently even therapy is going to be ruined by wokeness. 0.95

00:29:12.040 So we have a system that if you have mental problems, we can make them worse.

00:29:16.240 Is your employee and or your spouse, if they go to therapy, do they come back better or they come back worse?

00:29:35.560 Now, I've only been in one form of it.

00:29:37.660 It was marriage counseling for my first marriage.

00:29:43.620 Definitely made it worse.

00:29:46.240 I never could have guessed that marriage counseling could make things worse, but it definitely did.

00:29:52.940 Definitely did.

00:29:54.020 Now, I don't know if that's common for the other therapies.

00:29:57.860 I am sure the therapy is, number one, well-intentioned.

00:30:02.960 Everybody agree?

00:30:04.260 I don't think anybody goes into the therapy job with bad intentions.

00:30:09.460 Good intentions.

00:30:10.360 But if the system is to allow in the victim-oppressor model, you're not going to get a good result.

00:30:20.720 You're not.

00:30:21.960 And I have a feeling that might have snuck into my situation, because I think I might have been an oppressor in that context.

00:30:29.180 That's what it felt like.

00:30:31.680 Anyway, I told you that Forbes magazine, it's kind of a magazine still, did a hit piece on me.

00:30:41.760 They used to be a credible magazine, but now they're just ridiculous garbage.

00:30:46.200 And I had to look into the ownership of it.

00:30:50.840 For a while, it was owned by a Hong Kong-based company.

00:30:54.940 So I said to myself, aha, it's China. 0.93

00:30:58.900 China doesn't like me, so they're making Forbes write bad things about me.

00:31:03.020 But that's not the case.

00:31:04.640 So the Hong Kong-based thing sold its holdings to a 28-year-old rich guy, CEO of Luminar Technologies.

00:31:14.220 So Forbes, like the Washington Post, like Atlantic, owned by a rich guy, or a rich woman in the case of Atlantic.

00:31:27.420 So why do rich people buy major publications that do not look like they could ever make a profit?

00:31:35.260 Nobody would buy any of these assets to make money.

00:31:38.340 You just wouldn't do it.

00:31:39.980 Nobody's that dumb.

00:31:42.780 Why do you do it?

00:31:44.200 Well, you do it for influence, don't you?

00:31:46.900 I don't know of any other reason.

00:31:49.500 Let me ask you this.

00:31:50.380 What was the Forbes opinion on climate change up until recently?

00:31:59.720 Traditionally, let's say for the last 20 years,

00:32:01.920 what was the Forbes view on climate change?

00:32:06.900 What was Steve Forbes' view on climate change?

00:32:13.240 Skeptical.

00:32:14.760 Skeptical.

00:32:15.740 Yeah.

00:32:15.860 I don't want to be the one who characterizes Steve Forbes' opinion on climate change.

00:32:24.320 But I would say that he might have been not alarmist.

00:32:30.900 Not alarmist.

00:32:32.700 How about the new guy?

00:32:34.100 Well, the new guy apparently has donated money to both parties.

00:32:37.100 So he's donated to both Republicans and Democrats, but not much.

00:32:41.700 So he's not a big donor.

00:32:43.560 But he's spread it around to both sides, which makes sense.

00:32:47.200 He's just a good business person.

00:32:48.480 But he is, so he doesn't advertise his political leanings,

00:32:54.020 except that one of his main concerns we know from the 2018 article was

00:32:59.400 climate change.

00:33:02.080 Right.

00:33:02.700 So somebody who is not political, but says his biggest concern is climate change,

00:33:08.260 now owns Forbes.

00:33:11.940 What's my opinion on climate change?

00:33:14.140 Probably really close to Steve Forbes.

00:33:20.820 Skeptical.

00:33:22.500 Skeptical of models.

00:33:25.000 Skeptical that, you know, it's not for the benefit of China.

00:33:30.180 Skeptical that, you know, going completely green too fast is a good idea.

00:33:35.360 You know, maybe you should phase into it.

00:33:37.320 So I probably, this is just a guess, because I don't know this to be true.

00:33:41.840 But probably if Steve Forbes and I sat down and talked about climate change,

00:33:47.320 there'd probably be not much difference.

00:33:50.480 How about if I sat down with the new owner of Forbes and we talked about

00:33:55.000 climate change?

00:33:56.360 If it's his biggest issue, I doubt he's skeptical about it.

00:34:02.280 So now, remember I told you, if you don't know the players,

00:34:06.500 nothing makes sense.

00:34:07.340 Do you think that Steve Forbes would have allowed an article

00:34:13.040 that's basically a hit piece about me?

00:34:19.840 You want to know something that I shouldn't tell you?

00:34:23.800 For several years, Steve Forbes asked me personally to sign my books

00:34:28.480 as Christmas gifts for members of his family.

00:34:33.820 Which I did.

00:34:35.420 Which I don't do, by the way.

00:34:37.340 But in case you're, you thought, oh, I'll send you a book and you'll sign it.

00:34:40.480 I'm not going to do it.

00:34:41.720 I will throw the book in the trash.

00:34:43.840 But it was Steve Forbes.

00:34:45.540 And I always liked Steve Forbes.

00:34:47.500 So I thought, oh, Steve Forbes.

00:34:49.780 I don't know him personally.

00:34:51.560 But I thought, you know, if he wants my books for his family,

00:34:55.620 I want his books down my, I want his family down my books.

00:34:58.500 So I signed them a few times.

00:35:02.240 Now, you see how important the players are?

00:35:07.340 It's the players.

00:35:09.060 Yeah.

00:35:09.500 If you read the news and you believe you're reading news that somebody objectively thought,

00:35:14.940 oh, I think this is the important thing that my audience needs to see.

00:35:20.320 Sometimes.

00:35:22.040 But lots of times it depends who owns the product.

00:35:24.680 So I think Steve Forbes is still involved in some ways.

00:35:30.580 But obviously the CEO would be the boss.

00:35:34.840 All right.

00:35:36.280 There's some controversy about Trump's star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame.

00:35:44.060 Is that what it is?

00:35:45.140 So in Hollywood, you know, they put your star in the sidewalk.

00:35:48.100 And some people want to have it removed.

00:35:51.620 But I don't think you should have it removed.

00:35:53.640 That would, I think, has a more use, a bigger use.

00:35:59.380 I think your therapist could take you down to that sidewalk

00:36:02.400 and point you to the star and say, I have two questions.

00:36:07.980 How do you feel about your mother?

00:36:10.640 And what do you think about this star?

00:36:12.260 And then you would know all of their mental illnesses.

00:36:17.980 So you can use the Trump star as a way of diagnosing mental illness.

00:36:23.900 Uh-huh.

00:36:24.840 So when you look at the star, you see Hitler, Mussolini, Pol Pot, Stalin, and Thanos.

00:36:34.360 Okay.

00:36:35.900 Okay.

00:36:37.020 Yeah.

00:36:37.480 That's all you would need to diagnose somebody's mental illness.

00:36:40.360 So I think they should use it for that.

00:36:43.140 Kind of an important asset.

00:36:45.720 Well, speaking of Trump, CNN is still talking about his Christmas message

00:36:53.280 that all the losers should rot in hell,

00:36:56.260 which was one of the funniest things he's ever said.

00:36:59.800 Because if you take it in a context, it sounds like Hitler or Mussolini.

00:37:05.600 But if you see it in context, it's just funny.

00:37:09.200 And it's, you know, it's on message.

00:37:12.820 And, you know, it's something he's been doing for, I don't know, 15 years or something.

00:37:18.400 How long has he been doing message?

00:37:20.800 Well, before he ran for president the first time.

00:37:22.960 He was doing things like, you know, Merry Christmas, except to the losers or something.

00:37:29.500 So he always does this.

00:37:32.000 But CNN had Debbie Dingell on to look offended. 1.00

00:37:37.100 Now, Debbie Dingell, if you don't know what she looks like, 0.99

00:37:39.480 just imagine a poor man's E. Jean Carroll.

00:37:43.420 Or what E. Jean Carroll looked like if she'd been, like, sick for a couple weeks.

00:37:50.580 So that's what, just so you have the visual.

00:37:53.200 But if I were in charge of nicknames, what would you call Debbie Dingell? 1.00

00:38:00.280 It's got to be Dingleberry.

00:38:02.900 It's got to be Dingleberry.

00:38:05.080 Yeah.

00:38:06.740 That's all I'm going to say about that.

00:38:08.340 Like, I'm not in charge of nicknames, but if you could look at a Debbie Dingell 1.00

00:38:15.160 and you come up with any nickname that isn't Dingleberry,

00:38:18.640 well, you've done it incorrectly.

00:38:20.540 You need to go back and adjust your work.

00:38:24.340 And you people who are not Native American speakers,

00:38:28.360 I'll give you a few minutes to look that up in the urban slang dictionary.

00:38:35.660 I found out today from a post by D.C. Drano

00:38:40.400 that Russian textbooks teach history to their students.

00:38:48.760 And in Russia, they learn that the 2020 election was rigged,

00:38:53.660 was rigged for Joe Biden

00:38:58.240 and that Biden's family has corrupt commercial interests in Ukraine.

00:39:03.100 That's right.

00:39:03.940 That in Russia, they teach in school

00:39:08.680 that it's a fact that the 2020 election was rigged

00:39:14.300 and it's a fact

00:39:16.020 that Biden is corrupt.

00:39:23.940 That's what they learn in school.

00:39:25.360 Now,

00:39:28.100 I happen to think that's true.

00:39:33.100 I happen to think that's true.

00:39:35.220 Let me be very clear.

00:39:36.920 I'm not aware of any evidence whatsoever

00:39:39.060 that the 2020 election was rigged.

00:39:41.980 I'm not aware of any evidence of it whatsoever.

00:39:44.520 I've not seen anything that I consider proof of that.

00:39:47.800 And I also believe that Biden was elected by our American system.

00:39:55.540 So I congratulated him on day one

00:39:58.160 and have never changed that.

00:40:00.380 Because even if the system is corrupt,

00:40:03.540 it worked the way the corrupt system works

00:40:06.220 and got us a result.

00:40:07.740 And so I accepted it.

00:40:08.820 Because I don't know,

00:40:09.620 maybe it was always corrupt.

00:40:11.160 I've accepted all the other presidents.

00:40:14.420 But I'm going to say the obvious.

00:40:19.180 If you believe that every American system

00:40:22.520 and institution was corrupt,

00:40:25.420 except for our elections,

00:40:26.940 I just want to hear you say that out loud.

00:40:33.960 See if he could get the...

00:40:35.320 Here's a challenge for you for New Year's

00:40:37.340 when you get together with your relatives.

00:40:39.200 See if you can get a Democrat to say out loud

00:40:41.560 that they do understand

00:40:43.800 that all of our other systems are corrupt.

00:40:46.560 Because most people can see that.

00:40:48.620 But that they believe that the elections

00:40:50.460 are the one shining example of non-corruption

00:40:53.880 in our country

00:40:54.860 in which everything else is corrupt.

00:40:57.720 I just want to see somebody say it out loud

00:40:59.960 in like a complete sentence.

00:41:03.780 You know what they'll say instead?

00:41:06.060 No court found any problems.

00:41:09.480 That's right.

00:41:14.440 So,

00:41:15.540 did you know

00:41:17.900 that

00:41:19.220 before the 1990s

00:41:22.780 that rural voters in America

00:41:25.720 and the city voters,

00:41:27.500 they voted about the same?

00:41:29.140 There wasn't that much difference

00:41:30.980 between country people

00:41:32.300 and city folk.

00:41:34.460 But around the mid

00:41:35.620 or early 90s actually,

00:41:37.880 but close to the mid 90s,

00:41:39.420 there was a big change

00:41:40.860 and suddenly the lines diverged

00:41:43.220 and country folk

00:41:45.240 became more Republican

00:41:47.080 and city folk

00:41:48.520 became more Democrat.

00:41:51.320 Now,

00:41:51.900 what do you think caused that?

00:41:53.620 Everything was going along

00:41:55.440 stably

00:41:56.120 and then mid 90s,

00:41:58.060 boom,

00:41:59.020 big change.

00:41:59.720 What happened?

00:42:00.100 You're blaming it

00:42:03.840 on Bill Clinton,

00:42:05.180 on racism,

00:42:06.260 cable news.

00:42:07.500 Well,

00:42:07.680 I'll give you two dates

00:42:08.660 that I think are relevant to this.

00:42:10.700 Fox News started in 1996,

00:42:13.440 the exact year

00:42:14.880 that the gap

00:42:17.180 widened.

00:42:18.880 Rush Limbaugh

00:42:22.000 started his radio show

00:42:23.580 in 1988.

00:42:25.900 Was it a gigantic impact

00:42:28.040 the year he started?

00:42:30.540 Not exactly.

00:42:32.360 Probably not.

00:42:33.320 I mean,

00:42:33.600 I don't remember,

00:42:34.300 but I don't think it was.

00:42:35.160 Probably took him a few years

00:42:36.360 to ramp up

00:42:37.100 to become the Rush

00:42:39.280 that you knew and loved.

00:42:42.140 So,

00:42:42.700 mid 90s,

00:42:43.520 you had Rush Limbaugh

00:42:44.520 and Fox News

00:42:46.320 entering the persuasion game.

00:42:50.400 Remember when I told you

00:42:51.560 that our opinions

00:42:52.540 are assigned to us?

00:42:54.640 Here it is.

00:42:56.360 You don't have to wonder.

00:42:58.580 It's really obvious.

00:43:00.340 As soon as there were

00:43:01.880 new entities

00:43:02.660 that were credible enough

00:43:04.300 that a lot of people

00:43:05.120 watched them,

00:43:06.880 their opinions

00:43:08.800 were assigned to them

00:43:09.680 and they accepted.

00:43:10.300 And so,

00:43:14.760 it's pretty much

00:43:15.560 just that.

00:43:17.100 Yeah,

00:43:17.340 it's pretty much

00:43:17.940 just that.

00:43:22.860 There is a

00:43:23.900 study

00:43:25.380 to try to

00:43:27.460 see if they can

00:43:28.240 identify fake news

00:43:29.460 just by the

00:43:30.400 semantic information.

00:43:33.260 So,

00:43:33.620 is there some

00:43:34.140 kind of algorithm

00:43:35.200 you could run

00:43:35.880 against a news story

00:43:37.080 that would find out

00:43:38.380 if it's fake

00:43:39.120 just by the way

00:43:40.480 it's constructed?

00:43:43.240 Now,

00:43:44.520 you see any problem

00:43:45.320 with that?

00:43:48.260 Do you think

00:43:48.900 there'd be any

00:43:49.500 risk

00:43:50.620 if we developed

00:43:52.040 an algorithm

00:43:52.680 that could spot

00:43:53.440 fake news?

00:43:55.320 Would anything

00:43:56.220 go wrong with that?

00:43:58.960 Yeah.

00:44:00.860 The last thing

00:44:02.240 we need

00:44:02.800 is a secret

00:44:04.320 algorithm

00:44:04.960 for finding

00:44:05.640 fake news.

00:44:07.080 I can't think

00:44:08.020 of anything

00:44:08.420 that's a worse

00:44:08.980 idea.

00:44:10.100 Oh,

00:44:10.320 yeah,

00:44:10.940 yeah,

00:44:11.580 yeah,

00:44:11.820 our technology

00:44:12.860 spotted some

00:44:13.680 fake news.

00:44:15.640 Well,

00:44:16.120 how did that

00:44:16.620 work?

00:44:17.200 Like,

00:44:17.680 how did

00:44:18.020 you spot it?

00:44:18.620 Well,

00:44:20.060 semantics

00:44:20.720 and stuff.

00:44:22.180 Well,

00:44:22.400 could you be

00:44:22.820 more specific?

00:44:24.220 Well,

00:44:25.320 yes,

00:44:25.820 it's the

00:44:26.200 order of

00:44:26.780 the semantics.

00:44:28.560 That's still

00:44:29.240 not,

00:44:30.120 well,

00:44:30.360 it's the

00:44:30.740 specific

00:44:31.260 order of

00:44:32.400 the semantics

00:44:33.040 which we run

00:44:34.440 against a

00:44:34.940 filter

00:44:35.360 that's based

00:44:36.700 on patterns

00:44:37.580 which are

00:44:38.540 taken from

00:44:39.040 a large

00:44:39.420 language model

00:44:40.280 which we run

00:44:41.600 through some

00:44:42.640 other filters

00:44:43.360 and then a

00:44:44.000 transformer

00:44:44.560 and then we

00:44:45.880 get the answer.

00:44:47.980 I don't

00:44:48.660 understand any

00:44:49.580 of those words

00:44:50.420 which you just

00:44:51.060 said.

00:44:52.200 Don't worry

00:44:52.700 about it.

00:44:53.300 We just told you

00:44:53.980 it's fake news.

00:44:55.200 It's fake news.

00:44:57.180 Well,

00:44:57.460 how do I know

00:44:58.040 that's true?

00:44:59.480 You idiot.

00:45:00.820 Look at what

00:45:01.360 the fact checkers

00:45:02.100 say.

00:45:02.740 Just check the

00:45:03.320 fact checkers.

00:45:04.380 The fact checkers

00:45:05.260 who are

00:45:06.020 Democrats just

00:45:06.820 like we are

00:45:07.500 and only want

00:45:09.080 our side of

00:45:09.640 the thing to

00:45:10.080 show,

00:45:10.480 they agree

00:45:10.860 with me.

00:45:11.840 So there's

00:45:12.380 proof.

00:45:13.340 Well,

00:45:13.620 I'm not sure

00:45:14.020 I can believe

00:45:14.520 those fact checkers

00:45:15.460 and I'm not

00:45:15.980 even sure I

00:45:16.440 can believe

00:45:16.780 your algorithm.

00:45:19.600 Well,

00:45:20.020 if you're not

00:45:20.440 going to believe

00:45:20.800 that,

00:45:21.200 would you at

00:45:21.700 least believe

00:45:22.340 the New York

00:45:22.840 Times?

00:45:23.940 Because the

00:45:24.320 New York

00:45:24.600 Times agrees 0.97

00:45:26.320 with the fact

00:45:26.940 checker

00:45:28.040 which agrees

00:45:28.780 with us

00:45:29.420 and just

00:45:30.680 because they're

00:45:31.220 all Democrats

00:45:31.920 who want

00:45:32.340 Trump to

00:45:32.740 die,

00:45:33.820 I think

00:45:34.720 that's a

00:45:35.060 coincidence.

00:45:36.200 You just

00:45:36.440 have to look

00:45:36.880 at all of

00:45:38.340 these things

00:45:38.800 pointing in

00:45:39.280 the same

00:45:39.580 direction.

00:45:40.320 I mean,

00:45:40.580 where there's

00:45:40.940 smoke,

00:45:41.300 there's fire.

00:45:43.500 Yeah,

00:45:43.760 the last

00:45:44.440 thing we

00:45:44.920 need is

00:45:46.040 a secret

00:45:46.520 algorithm for

00:45:47.360 finding fake

00:45:48.040 news because

00:45:49.180 that's going

00:45:49.600 to be corrupt

00:45:50.420 in about 10

00:45:51.160 seconds.

00:45:53.720 Nikki Haley

00:45:54.540 had a,

00:45:55.160 let's say,

00:45:56.540 suboptimal

00:45:57.360 weekend,

00:45:58.900 or yesterday,

00:45:59.620 I guess,

00:46:00.380 she was

00:46:01.400 asked about

00:46:01.900 the cause

00:46:02.560 of the

00:46:02.880 Civil War,

00:46:03.940 which made

00:46:06.040 her laugh

00:46:06.560 because it's

00:46:07.280 not exactly

00:46:07.820 a normal

00:46:08.340 campaign question.

00:46:10.100 But you

00:46:10.780 know what

00:46:11.060 it is?

00:46:13.060 It's kind

00:46:13.840 of a layup.

00:46:15.940 It was

00:46:16.600 kind of a

00:46:17.020 softball

00:46:17.520 question,

00:46:18.060 wasn't it?

00:46:18.920 What was

00:46:19.260 the cause

00:46:19.740 of the

00:46:20.040 Civil War?

00:46:20.560 allow me

00:46:23.200 to take

00:46:23.680 a crack

00:46:24.120 at it.

00:46:25.920 Well,

00:46:26.800 the cause

00:46:27.200 of the

00:46:27.440 Civil War,

00:46:28.580 of course,

00:46:29.420 slavery was

00:46:30.300 a base

00:46:31.580 concern,

00:46:32.600 but of

00:46:32.940 course,

00:46:33.180 historians

00:46:33.620 will tell

00:46:34.060 you there

00:46:34.400 were other

00:46:35.500 variables as

00:46:39.700 well,

00:46:40.480 such as

00:46:41.220 Lincoln

00:46:41.480 wanting to

00:46:42.260 keep the

00:46:43.760 country

00:46:44.040 together,

00:46:44.900 and such

00:46:45.180 as different

00:46:45.920 economic

00:46:46.460 interests,

00:46:47.100 et cetera.

00:46:48.040 But yes,

00:46:48.680 slavery was

00:46:49.520 at the

00:46:49.840 core of

00:46:50.220 that,

00:46:51.500 but was

00:46:51.920 not the

00:46:52.440 whole story.

00:46:54.620 How did

00:46:54.900 I do?

00:46:56.860 Okay.

00:46:58.420 Everybody

00:46:58.900 happy with

00:46:59.480 that answer?

00:47:00.940 Yeah.

00:47:02.100 Even if you

00:47:02.840 disagreed,

00:47:04.580 it's reasonable

00:47:05.240 for a

00:47:05.660 politician to

00:47:06.280 say,

00:47:06.940 yeah,

00:47:07.700 slavery was

00:47:08.320 a big part

00:47:08.740 of it,

00:47:09.460 but other

00:47:10.300 interests as

00:47:10.960 well.

00:47:12.480 What did

00:47:13.180 Nikki Haley

00:47:13.660 say?

00:47:13.960 she summarized

00:47:17.240 it and said,

00:47:17.700 well,

00:47:18.220 it's really

00:47:18.580 about what

00:47:19.060 government

00:47:19.440 can and

00:47:19.940 cannot do.

00:47:21.880 What?

00:47:23.640 Yeah,

00:47:24.180 it's sort

00:47:24.420 of about

00:47:24.780 big government

00:47:25.760 versus small

00:47:26.500 government.

00:47:27.360 She didn't

00:47:27.900 say that,

00:47:28.740 but she

00:47:29.620 tried to

00:47:29.980 give sort

00:47:30.360 of a

00:47:30.600 generic

00:47:31.240 non-answer,

00:47:34.140 and then

00:47:35.340 people took

00:47:35.900 that as

00:47:36.500 she either

00:47:37.100 doesn't

00:47:37.460 understand

00:47:38.080 the legacy

00:47:39.660 of slavery,

00:47:40.480 which of

00:47:40.820 course she

00:47:41.160 does.

00:47:42.280 It was

00:47:42.740 basically

00:47:43.100 just one

00:47:43.560 of these

00:47:43.780 gotcha

00:47:44.120 things.

00:47:45.580 But

00:47:45.740 speaking of

00:47:46.360 gotchas,

00:47:49.120 before she,

00:47:50.520 as part

00:47:51.060 of her

00:47:51.300 answer,

00:47:51.680 she said,

00:47:52.260 quote,

00:47:52.980 what do

00:47:53.260 you want

00:47:53.500 me to

00:47:53.760 say about

00:47:54.120 slavery?

00:47:55.940 In other

00:47:56.520 words,

00:47:57.680 she was

00:47:58.000 trying to

00:47:58.300 figure out

00:47:58.680 what slavery

00:47:59.280 had to

00:47:59.680 do with

00:48:00.160 her current

00:48:00.860 run for

00:48:01.380 president.

00:48:02.840 So that's

00:48:03.300 a reasonable

00:48:03.680 question,

00:48:04.180 right?

00:48:04.920 What do

00:48:05.320 you want

00:48:05.500 me to

00:48:05.700 say about

00:48:06.020 slavery?

00:48:06.820 Sort

00:48:07.040 of like

00:48:07.400 what's

00:48:07.640 that got

00:48:07.920 to do

00:48:08.180 with our

00:48:08.440 conversation?

00:48:10.700 Vivek

00:48:11.300 Rabaswamy

00:48:12.200 quotes her

00:48:12.820 in the

00:48:13.040 post where

00:48:14.000 she says,

00:48:14.740 what do

00:48:14.980 you want

00:48:15.200 me to

00:48:15.400 say about

00:48:15.740 slavery?

00:48:16.600 He quotes

00:48:17.100 her and

00:48:17.400 then he

00:48:17.640 says,

00:48:18.300 I think

00:48:18.640 she mistook

00:48:19.360 the person

00:48:20.380 in the

00:48:20.640 audience for

00:48:21.380 a super

00:48:21.780 pack donor.

00:48:23.800 That's

00:48:24.120 pretty good.

00:48:25.000 What do

00:48:25.280 you want

00:48:25.500 me to

00:48:25.740 say?

00:48:26.660 Ask your

00:48:27.360 donors what

00:48:28.340 they want

00:48:28.940 you to

00:48:29.160 say.

00:48:30.060 Pretty

00:48:30.580 good,

00:48:31.420 Vivek.

00:48:32.560 All right.

00:48:33.820 I don't

00:48:34.500 think that's

00:48:34.920 an important

00:48:35.340 story, but

00:48:36.320 it's happening.

00:48:38.320 Glenn Greenwald

00:48:39.020 pointed out

00:48:39.640 that CNN

00:48:40.260 went easy

00:48:40.920 on her

00:48:41.380 because she's

00:48:43.360 part of the

00:48:43.960 military-industrial

00:48:44.800 complex, he's

00:48:46.380 suggesting.

00:48:48.780 All right.

00:48:49.720 AOC was

00:48:50.680 doing some

00:48:51.860 crazy video

00:48:53.040 live-streaming

00:48:54.220 about the

00:48:54.840 border, and

00:48:56.320 she said it's

00:48:56.860 not an

00:48:57.180 immigration

00:48:57.600 crisis, it's

00:48:58.900 an imperialism

00:48:59.700 crisis, it's

00:49:00.840 a climate

00:49:01.260 crisis, and

00:49:02.160 it's a trade

00:49:02.720 crisis.

00:49:03.920 That's right.

00:49:04.740 If you

00:49:06.000 fix the

00:49:06.480 climate,

00:49:07.940 imperialism,

00:49:09.300 and trade,

00:49:11.000 and of

00:49:11.840 course you're

00:49:12.180 also going

00:49:12.660 to have to

00:49:12.960 get rid of

00:49:13.420 white supremacy,

00:49:15.560 she mentioned,

00:49:16.700 if you get

00:49:17.480 rid of those

00:49:17.960 things,

00:49:19.300 immigration just

00:49:20.040 takes care of

00:49:20.580 itself.

00:49:21.640 So we

00:49:23.400 don't have an

00:49:23.880 immigration

00:49:24.340 problem, we

00:49:25.720 got a white

00:49:26.140 people problem.

00:49:28.200 A lot of

00:49:28.860 white people

00:49:29.280 problems.

00:49:30.920 I may be

00:49:31.820 interpreting it

00:49:32.620 that way.

00:49:34.740 Yeah, she's

00:49:35.720 crazy and

00:49:36.340 worthless, and

00:49:37.280 getting back to

00:49:38.560 my theme about

00:49:39.580 the quality of

00:49:40.920 our leaders,

00:49:42.060 does AOC, she's 0.96

00:49:43.800 very persuasive,

00:49:44.760 I always say,

00:49:45.920 but does she

00:49:46.900 seem like a

00:49:47.660 qualified leader?

00:49:49.500 I don't think

00:49:50.400 so.

00:49:51.680 Being persuasive

00:49:52.540 isn't good

00:49:53.040 enough.

00:49:54.140 She is, I

00:49:55.380 don't think

00:49:55.780 she's even,

00:49:57.640 I'm not even

00:49:58.500 sure she has

00:49:58.980 good intentions.

00:50:03.000 Really?

00:50:03.520 I mean, she

00:50:04.820 might, I

00:50:05.620 can't read her

00:50:06.100 mind, but it

00:50:07.140 doesn't, it's

00:50:08.500 not obvious that

00:50:09.580 she has good

00:50:10.040 intentions.

00:50:11.720 There are a lot

00:50:12.420 of people who

00:50:12.820 would agree with

00:50:13.400 her that are 1.00

00:50:14.660 more obvious that

00:50:15.600 they're coming

00:50:15.960 from a place of

00:50:16.780 good intentions,

00:50:17.400 but this is

00:50:18.280 crazy shit.

00:50:19.820 This just looks

00:50:20.580 like she's mad

00:50:21.760 at her father,

00:50:22.960 or she's mad at

00:50:24.520 white people,

00:50:25.940 or something.

00:50:26.900 Like, why

00:50:27.280 would you throw

00:50:27.820 in imperialism,

00:50:28.940 climate crisis,

00:50:30.380 trade, and white

00:50:31.240 supremacy into

00:50:32.820 a unguarded

00:50:34.680 border question?

00:50:36.480 There's just,

00:50:36.920 you're either

00:50:37.320 sick, or so

00:50:40.000 political you're

00:50:40.960 useless, or

00:50:42.460 you're incompetent,

00:50:43.640 or you're just

00:50:44.980 a racist, or

00:50:46.960 all of the

00:50:47.520 above.

00:50:48.040 I think she's

00:50:48.760 incompetent and

00:50:49.640 a racist, is my

00:50:50.980 best guess.

00:50:52.300 But that's, our

00:50:53.040 current system

00:50:53.840 elected her because

00:50:55.620 of her great

00:50:56.460 quality, right?

00:50:57.160 do you remember

00:51:00.060 why she got

00:51:00.600 elected?

00:51:03.200 Because she

00:51:03.900 was female, and 0.80

00:51:04.880 she also tried

00:51:05.660 hard.

00:51:07.300 She wore on her

00:51:08.300 sneakers because

00:51:08.940 she tried hard.

00:51:10.460 Because people

00:51:11.440 were really excited

00:51:12.300 to see a woman

00:51:12.960 try hard.

00:51:15.420 I hate to say

00:51:16.420 it, but that's

00:51:16.940 what it was.

00:51:18.280 She's female, and 1.00

00:51:19.480 she tried really

00:51:20.180 hard.

00:51:21.260 And that was

00:51:21.660 good enough?

00:51:23.140 Wow.

00:51:24.080 She's young and

00:51:24.580 female, and she 0.99

00:51:25.120 tried really hard.

00:51:27.160 All right.

00:51:31.420 Latest on

00:51:32.100 Ukraine is that 0.96

00:51:33.300 the rumors are

00:51:34.120 that the Biden

00:51:34.880 administration wants

00:51:35.840 to start some

00:51:36.740 kind of negotiating

00:51:37.720 and end to it.

00:51:39.340 And of course, if

00:51:40.000 they did that, the

00:51:40.820 end would look

00:51:41.940 like some limits

00:51:44.680 on NATO

00:51:45.180 expansion, probably.

00:51:47.640 Russia keeping 0.95

00:51:48.560 the stuff that

00:51:49.200 they already got,

00:51:49.980 probably.

00:51:51.320 And it's going to

00:51:52.160 look exactly like

00:51:53.080 Elon Musk said

00:51:54.040 it would look

00:51:54.600 before they killed

00:51:56.620 so many people.

00:51:58.220 You remember

00:51:58.620 how much trouble

00:51:59.400 Elon Musk got

00:52:01.160 for suggesting

00:52:02.360 maybe they should

00:52:03.040 work it out

00:52:03.580 before they just

00:52:04.400 mindlessly kill

00:52:06.260 each other?

00:52:07.400 But everybody

00:52:08.160 said, no, no.

00:52:09.740 Much better to

00:52:10.560 mindlessly kill

00:52:11.420 each other.

00:52:12.560 But let's just

00:52:13.400 keep mindlessly

00:52:14.280 killing each other.

00:52:15.560 And so that's

00:52:16.400 what they did.

00:52:17.440 But they're going

00:52:18.220 to end up right

00:52:18.860 back where the

00:52:19.580 smart people like

00:52:20.500 David Sachs and

00:52:21.620 Elon Musk and

00:52:22.600 other people said

00:52:23.380 they would.

00:52:23.760 it's going to

00:52:25.900 look exactly

00:52:28.340 like it looks

00:52:28.940 now.

00:52:29.700 No NATO.

00:52:31.020 Russia keeps 0.98

00:52:31.540 those places.

00:52:33.280 Now, I think

00:52:33.780 we'll find a way

00:52:34.780 to make the

00:52:35.380 obvious not

00:52:36.020 happen.

00:52:37.520 The obvious

00:52:38.240 solution is you

00:52:39.100 just work it

00:52:39.660 out and you

00:52:40.740 do it quickly.

00:52:42.500 So since that's

00:52:43.400 obvious and it's

00:52:44.100 smart, we'll find

00:52:44.820 some way not to

00:52:45.560 do it.

00:52:47.140 How's our

00:52:47.780 immigration doing?

00:52:49.140 Our immigration

00:52:49.760 court has a

00:52:50.540 backlog of more

00:52:52.040 than three million

00:52:52.840 cases.

00:52:54.600 Three million

00:52:55.760 people, according

00:52:57.700 to our system,

00:52:59.280 need to be

00:52:59.860 interviewed to

00:53:00.780 find out if

00:53:01.480 they're really

00:53:02.000 coming across

00:53:02.800 because of

00:53:04.220 their, like,

00:53:06.240 what's the

00:53:06.820 word?

00:53:08.060 Political

00:53:08.660 refugees.

00:53:09.860 What's the

00:53:10.140 word?

00:53:11.620 Asylum.

00:53:12.900 Are they really

00:53:13.700 legitimate asylum

00:53:15.220 seekers or are

00:53:15.980 they coming here

00:53:16.500 for work?

00:53:18.360 Three million

00:53:19.260 of them.

00:53:20.440 So I ask you

00:53:21.700 again, are the

00:53:23.680 systems in this

00:53:24.720 country designed

00:53:25.600 to increase the

00:53:27.740 capability of our

00:53:28.880 workforce and our

00:53:29.940 people or to

00:53:31.200 decrease it?

00:53:32.400 Well, if you've

00:53:33.460 got a court that

00:53:34.440 can't even look at

00:53:35.660 asylum cases, it is 0.99

00:53:37.460 clearly by design,

00:53:39.120 not intention, but

00:53:40.680 by design, to make

00:53:42.680 us less capable.

00:53:43.520 what else could

00:53:45.740 happen?

00:53:47.380 There's no other

00:53:48.160 way it could go.

00:53:49.860 So that's the

00:53:50.340 design.

00:53:51.300 Design is destiny.

00:53:53.860 All right, how's

00:53:54.280 Bidenomics coming? 0.91

00:53:57.780 Let's see.

00:53:58.500 Stocks are up.

00:54:00.860 Inflation is, you

00:54:02.660 know, prices are

00:54:03.340 still higher than we

00:54:04.160 want, but at least

00:54:04.940 the rate seems to be

00:54:06.760 down in a reasonable

00:54:08.220 level at the moment.

00:54:09.040 gas prices are

00:54:11.200 lower than the

00:54:12.320 highest, but they're

00:54:13.920 much higher than the

00:54:14.760 lowest.

00:54:16.500 Job growth is not

00:54:18.220 bad.

00:54:20.560 Unemployment, not

00:54:22.080 bad.

00:54:23.920 But, as Michael

00:54:25.980 Schellenberger points

00:54:27.420 out today, real

00:54:29.040 wages are down, so

00:54:30.820 workers have less

00:54:31.560 money, and interest

00:54:34.020 rates are high, which

00:54:35.720 has the effect of

00:54:36.760 giving you less

00:54:38.420 money, because if

00:54:39.600 you want to buy a

00:54:40.140 house, it'll cost

00:54:40.760 you more.

00:54:41.960 So, how would you

00:54:43.440 net this out?

00:54:46.320 If you take the

00:54:48.100 net, is the

00:54:48.820 economy good or

00:54:50.220 bad?

00:54:51.440 Because you do

00:54:52.200 have, people have

00:54:53.280 jobs, that's good.

00:54:55.780 Prices are not

00:54:56.640 going up out of

00:54:57.580 control, that's

00:54:59.040 good.

00:55:00.860 But people have

00:55:01.800 less buying power.

00:55:03.540 Well, I think the

00:55:04.160 less buying power was

00:55:05.360 baked into the

00:55:06.560 model, right?

00:55:08.540 Inflation was

00:55:09.200 guaranteed for a

00:55:09.980 while.

00:55:10.700 Interest rates will

00:55:11.380 probably come down.

00:55:13.520 So, here's how I

00:55:14.500 would say you

00:55:15.600 should look at it.

00:55:17.740 It depends

00:55:18.520 entirely upon

00:55:19.600 which of these

00:55:20.980 things you think

00:55:21.640 are temporary.

00:55:23.600 If you think

00:55:24.400 interest rates are

00:55:25.100 coming down, and

00:55:26.360 the Fed seems to

00:55:27.240 be signaling that,

00:55:28.940 then we might

00:55:29.760 be, let's say,

00:55:31.900 gliding back into a

00:55:33.140 better situation.

00:55:33.900 I tend to think

00:55:35.620 that we're in

00:55:36.080 good shape, except

00:55:36.800 for the debt, that

00:55:38.260 I have no idea how

00:55:39.180 we'll ever handle

00:55:39.920 it, unless we can

00:55:41.900 figure out with

00:55:42.440 robots and AI how

00:55:44.220 to boost our

00:55:44.820 productivity so

00:55:45.860 much that, you

00:55:48.100 know, that

00:55:48.860 inflation gets

00:55:49.660 eaten up by

00:55:50.320 productivity.

00:55:51.640 Maybe, but

00:55:53.240 everything we're

00:55:54.420 doing so far

00:55:55.240 seems to be to

00:55:56.700 make all of our

00:55:57.620 productivity worse

00:55:58.740 instead of

00:55:59.320 better.

00:55:59.500 All right.

00:56:05.320 Let's look at the

00:56:06.600 lawfare situation.

00:56:08.100 Remember

00:56:08.400 Brandon Stracca?

00:56:10.040 He was the

00:56:11.080 leader of the

00:56:11.920 walk-away movement,

00:56:13.100 meaning walk away

00:56:14.140 from the Democrats

00:56:15.060 and consider

00:56:16.500 Trump.

00:56:17.520 Well, he

00:56:17.880 attended the

00:56:18.820 January 6th

00:56:21.180 events.

00:56:21.960 He did not go

00:56:22.820 inside, did not

00:56:24.420 go inside the

00:56:25.060 Capitol, and he

00:56:26.600 did not hurt

00:56:27.260 anybody.

00:56:27.680 so he did

00:56:29.060 no violence, and

00:56:31.660 he did not go

00:56:32.380 inside the

00:56:32.780 Capitol.

00:56:34.140 But he not

00:56:35.520 only was

00:56:37.160 threatened with

00:56:37.720 jail, but he

00:56:38.580 was sued by

00:56:40.240 some of the

00:56:40.720 police officers,

00:56:41.660 including this

00:56:43.340 one Byron

00:56:43.940 Evans, and he

00:56:45.500 was sued under

00:56:46.160 the KKK

00:56:47.000 Act, alleging

00:56:48.860 that Brandon

00:56:51.380 had violated

00:56:52.660 his civil

00:56:53.200 rights and

00:56:54.180 conspired with

00:56:54.920 white supremacists

00:56:55.880 to commit

00:56:56.420 assault and

00:56:57.040 battery.

00:56:57.680 Holy fuck.

00:57:02.940 I had no idea

00:57:04.080 that that

00:57:04.500 happened.

00:57:05.600 Did you know

00:57:06.140 that this

00:57:07.260 poor guy got

00:57:08.220 sued under

00:57:10.680 the KKK

00:57:11.660 Act for

00:57:14.400 discrimination?

00:57:16.140 Was there

00:57:16.960 anything about

00:57:18.380 January 6th that

00:57:19.480 had to do with

00:57:19.980 race?

00:57:20.360 in fact, January

00:57:23.500 6th was the

00:57:24.300 most pure

00:57:25.140 non-racial

00:57:26.140 event in the

00:57:26.880 history of the

00:57:27.460 United States.

00:57:28.820 We've never

00:57:29.760 had an

00:57:31.360 event that

00:57:33.040 was that

00:57:34.000 completely

00:57:34.540 non-racial.

00:57:37.340 Look at the

00:57:38.580 defenders of the

00:57:40.160 Capitol.

00:57:41.480 Did we not see

00:57:42.940 white and

00:57:43.800 black and

00:57:44.960 Asian and

00:57:46.620 Hispanic

00:57:47.360 defenders of the

00:57:48.680 Capitol working

00:57:49.620 arm-in-arm

00:57:50.820 together?

00:57:52.700 That's what I

00:57:53.700 saw.

00:57:55.220 Was anybody in

00:57:56.560 the crowd saying

00:57:57.600 anything racial?

00:57:59.840 No.

00:58:01.520 Nothing.

00:58:03.960 It just wasn't

00:58:05.300 even part of the

00:58:05.880 conversation.

00:58:06.400 this was the

00:58:08.920 least racial

00:58:10.760 event of

00:58:12.720 all time.

00:58:13.480 You can make

00:58:14.320 almost everything

00:58:15.300 else racial,

00:58:16.660 because we do

00:58:17.220 that with our

00:58:18.040 news and

00:58:18.660 everything else.

00:58:19.640 You can make

00:58:20.220 everything else

00:58:21.240 racial, but

00:58:22.200 there was

00:58:22.540 nothing.

00:58:23.860 There was

00:58:24.600 nothing in

00:58:25.300 January 6th that

00:58:26.120 was racial at

00:58:27.540 all.

00:58:28.260 That was purely

00:58:29.360 about the

00:58:31.500 integrity of the

00:58:32.280 vote.

00:58:32.660 That was it.

00:58:33.160 So just

00:58:35.260 watching this

00:58:36.160 is mind-blowing

00:58:37.160 that this

00:58:39.460 poor guy who

00:58:40.380 became influential

00:58:41.980 in politics was

00:58:44.120 taken down by

00:58:45.040 first a criminal

00:58:47.340 charge and then

00:58:48.400 a lawsuit that's

00:58:49.360 just plainly

00:58:50.160 ridiculous.

00:58:51.560 Absolutely

00:58:52.120 ridiculous.

00:58:53.620 Insane.

00:58:55.840 Well, who

00:58:56.300 else is in

00:58:56.860 trouble?

00:58:57.140 Let's say

00:58:57.620 so James

00:59:01.460 O'Keefe, you

00:59:02.180 know, his

00:59:02.440 undercover

00:59:02.860 videos, he's

00:59:03.840 now running

00:59:04.920 his own

00:59:05.220 operation, OMG.

00:59:07.120 So Axios

00:59:07.820 is reporting

00:59:08.360 that a

00:59:08.740 Manhattan

00:59:09.040 judge has

00:59:09.780 denied

00:59:10.280 Project

00:59:10.860 Veritas

00:59:11.620 First

00:59:12.860 Amendment

00:59:13.200 claims.

00:59:15.100 In other

00:59:15.380 words, when

00:59:16.800 before he

00:59:17.340 was OMG,

00:59:18.560 O'Keefe

00:59:18.880 was the

00:59:20.440 head of

00:59:20.700 Project

00:59:21.040 Veritas,

00:59:21.900 and apparently

00:59:22.940 they're not

00:59:23.780 going to get

00:59:24.260 protections as

00:59:26.060 journalists with

00:59:27.260 First Amendment

00:59:27.880 rights.

00:59:30.460 Wow.

00:59:33.460 But what

00:59:34.780 this means is

00:59:35.560 that prosecutors

00:59:36.240 are going to be

00:59:36.760 able to look at

00:59:37.280 a thousand

00:59:37.860 documents related

00:59:39.980 to the alleged

00:59:40.840 theft of Ashley

00:59:41.720 Biden's diary.

00:59:43.540 So that was the

00:59:44.460 case that

00:59:45.180 triggered this.

00:59:47.480 And I guess

00:59:48.460 Project Veritas

00:59:49.380 is claiming

00:59:50.220 it was somebody

00:59:52.300 else who stole

00:59:52.960 them, so they

00:59:53.580 were just acting

00:59:54.180 as journalists.

00:59:54.820 But the

00:59:58.640 moment, it

00:59:59.040 looks like we

00:59:59.500 might see a

01:00:00.020 lot of

01:00:00.220 documents related

01:00:01.000 to that.

01:00:01.680 So I don't

01:00:01.980 know if that's

01:00:02.360 good or bad.

01:00:05.360 All right.

01:00:06.100 The New York

01:00:06.660 Times, as you

01:00:07.340 know, is suing

01:00:07.980 OpenAI and

01:00:09.360 Microsoft because

01:00:10.540 it says ChatGPT

01:00:11.820 is stealing

01:00:13.580 their stuff.

01:00:15.100 I didn't know

01:00:15.940 how bad it

01:00:16.560 was until the

01:00:18.520 New York Times

01:00:19.020 gave examples.

01:00:20.220 So New York

01:00:21.700 Times gave

01:00:22.240 a hundred

01:00:22.720 examples.

01:00:24.960 You know,

01:00:25.200 obviously there

01:00:25.800 would be

01:00:26.080 infinite more,

01:00:27.040 but they just

01:00:27.440 picked a hundred

01:00:28.000 for their legal

01:00:29.360 case here.

01:00:30.380 And they found

01:00:31.220 a hundred cases

01:00:32.080 where if you

01:00:33.420 asked,

01:00:33.920 interesting.

01:00:46.440 You said,

01:00:48.000 oh, so the

01:00:50.900 New York Times

01:00:51.400 tested and they

01:00:52.540 asked ChatGPT

01:00:54.120 some questions.

01:00:55.740 And then they

01:00:56.160 saw how many

01:00:56.720 times ChatGPT

01:00:57.880 gave a verbatim

01:00:59.000 answer from an

01:01:00.460 article in the

01:01:01.140 New York Times

01:01:01.920 without mentioning

01:01:03.120 that it's a

01:01:03.760 verbatim answer

01:01:04.480 from the New

01:01:04.920 York Times.

01:01:05.440 It's a lot.

01:01:07.180 So why does

01:01:08.840 it do that?

01:01:10.980 Why does

01:01:11.980 ChatGPT

01:01:13.520 take entire

01:01:15.160 sections and

01:01:16.220 plagiarize them,

01:01:17.280 in effect,

01:01:17.960 plagiarize them,

01:01:18.980 from the New

01:01:19.620 York Times when

01:01:20.400 it has access to

01:01:21.320 so many sources?

01:01:22.920 Why would it

01:01:23.700 pick one source

01:01:24.740 sort of

01:01:25.880 preferentially?

01:01:29.500 Well,

01:01:30.040 I'm going to

01:01:32.400 hazard a

01:01:33.060 guess.

01:01:35.500 Why do you

01:01:36.240 think they

01:01:36.560 don't use

01:01:37.100 Fox News

01:01:37.920 preferentially?

01:01:41.660 It must be

01:01:42.720 programmed to

01:01:44.020 favor what

01:01:47.100 somebody would

01:01:48.220 imagine are

01:01:50.020 high-credibility,

01:01:52.240 left-leaning

01:01:52.860 publications.

01:01:54.380 Now, the New

01:01:54.760 York Times would

01:01:55.540 be among the

01:01:56.460 left, their

01:01:57.900 greatest standard

01:01:58.780 of credibility.

01:02:00.040 among people

01:02:01.440 in the political

01:02:02.120 right, that

01:02:03.360 would be seen

01:02:03.900 as a joke.

01:02:05.200 Am I right?

01:02:06.620 If you talk

01:02:07.460 to somebody

01:02:08.000 who's very

01:02:09.260 involved in

01:02:09.860 politics, very

01:02:11.220 informed on

01:02:12.100 the left, they

01:02:13.060 will tell you

01:02:13.620 that the New

01:02:14.160 York Times is

01:02:14.820 not perfect.

01:02:16.020 It's not

01:02:16.340 perfect.

01:02:16.960 It's got some

01:02:17.440 things wrong.

01:02:18.260 But it's the

01:02:19.020 standard for

01:02:19.860 news.

01:02:21.580 Will they not?

01:02:22.560 They'll tell you

01:02:22.960 it's the standard

01:02:23.540 for news.

01:02:24.260 If you talk to

01:02:24.960 anybody on the

01:02:25.560 right, they

01:02:26.260 will laugh and

01:02:26.980 say it's just

01:02:27.840 political.

01:02:28.500 political is

01:02:29.240 basically just

01:02:30.080 brainwashing and

01:02:31.260 propaganda, right?

01:02:33.500 Now, I'm not

01:02:34.360 saying which one

01:02:34.940 is right.

01:02:36.540 I'm saying that

01:02:37.420 somebody had to

01:02:38.000 pick which one

01:02:38.560 was right or

01:02:40.300 some buddies.

01:02:40.900 So I'm

01:02:42.700 assuming the

01:02:44.020 obvious, that

01:02:45.520 somebody who

01:02:46.380 has programming

01:02:47.580 control over

01:02:48.440 ChatGPT decided

01:02:50.460 on their own,

01:02:51.820 maybe with some

01:02:52.520 of their

01:02:52.760 coworkers, that

01:02:53.980 the New York

01:02:54.420 Times was very

01:02:55.180 credible and

01:02:56.640 that they want

01:02:57.700 their AI to be as

01:02:58.600 credible as

01:02:59.220 possible, so it

01:03:00.080 should give it a

01:03:00.520 little extra

01:03:00.960 consideration.

01:03:02.480 But since AI

01:03:04.660 is not programmed

01:03:05.800 completely in

01:03:08.360 detail, and it

01:03:09.480 gets to sort of

01:03:10.220 do its own

01:03:10.700 thing based on

01:03:11.400 patterns, it's

01:03:13.060 no surprise that

01:03:14.820 it favored

01:03:15.300 patterns coming

01:03:16.100 from one source

01:03:17.100 that was a

01:03:17.560 favored source.

01:03:19.080 But I assume

01:03:19.520 that's what's

01:03:19.940 going on.

01:03:21.260 So under the

01:03:24.640 circumstances, I

01:03:26.600 think I agree with

01:03:27.440 the New York

01:03:27.820 Times on this.

01:03:29.520 Would you agree?

01:03:30.980 If it's true that

01:03:33.700 the AI routinely

01:03:34.880 just quotes

01:03:35.640 verbatim the

01:03:36.560 New York Times,

01:03:37.300 I think the

01:03:38.540 New York

01:03:38.800 Times has

01:03:39.480 absolutely has

01:03:42.440 a case.

01:03:43.620 And you know

01:03:43.940 what else is

01:03:44.880 really funny?

01:03:47.400 Apparently

01:03:47.920 Apple has very

01:03:51.360 quietly and

01:03:52.400 cleverly started

01:03:54.200 paying for its

01:03:56.600 training sources,

01:03:58.320 for its AI,

01:03:59.040 its building, and

01:04:00.440 it's paying a lot.

01:04:02.220 So in other

01:04:03.320 words, instead of

01:04:04.760 just scraping

01:04:05.680 somebody's content

01:04:06.720 the way it

01:04:08.520 looks like

01:04:08.880 ChatGP did,

01:04:10.140 Apple is

01:04:10.620 saying, may

01:04:11.400 we train our

01:04:13.260 AI in your

01:04:13.900 content?

01:04:15.100 And then the

01:04:15.560 owner says,

01:04:16.360 well, for a

01:04:17.740 certain price,

01:04:19.180 and then they

01:04:19.640 say, what is

01:04:20.200 that price?

01:04:20.720 And then they

01:04:21.120 pay it.

01:04:22.780 So Apple is

01:04:24.380 making ChatGPT

01:04:25.760 look like

01:04:26.460 criminals, 0.62

01:04:27.600 because Apple,

01:04:29.140 without even

01:04:29.680 requiring to pay,

01:04:31.260 there's no law

01:04:31.840 that says I

01:04:32.280 have to pay.

01:04:33.300 Yes, I

01:04:33.960 mean, I

01:04:34.360 imagine there

01:04:34.820 will be.

01:04:35.760 But they're

01:04:36.260 getting ahead of

01:04:37.160 the law by

01:04:38.020 doing the

01:04:38.580 ethical thing.

01:04:40.100 So let me

01:04:40.560 stop for a

01:04:41.120 moment.

01:04:42.420 I sometimes

01:04:43.420 compliment and

01:04:44.880 sometimes

01:04:45.340 criticize Apple.

01:04:47.580 This is

01:04:48.020 smart.

01:04:49.540 It's ethical,

01:04:51.120 and it's

01:04:52.320 smart.

01:04:53.740 They just

01:04:54.300 said, if it's

01:04:55.140 going to go

01:04:55.520 this direction,

01:04:56.980 we want to be

01:04:57.680 on record as

01:04:58.320 being the ones

01:04:58.780 who paid for

01:04:59.360 it.

01:05:00.240 We want to

01:05:01.020 pay our

01:05:01.320 bills.

01:05:02.280 Absolutely

01:05:02.720 respect that.

01:05:03.900 Good choice.

01:05:05.000 Apple, good

01:05:05.540 choice.

01:05:07.380 So yeah, I

01:05:08.140 expect the New

01:05:08.620 York Times is

01:05:09.120 going to win

01:05:09.480 that, and

01:05:10.060 probably it

01:05:10.620 means that

01:05:11.220 Microsoft pays

01:05:12.240 them a lot

01:05:12.580 of money,

01:05:13.240 unless they

01:05:13.900 can unprogram

01:05:14.680 that.

01:05:16.200 At the same

01:05:16.940 time, U.S.

01:05:17.580 Senators,

01:05:18.260 Chris Coons and

01:05:19.060 Marshall Blackburn

01:05:19.740 are trying to

01:05:21.140 figure out what

01:05:21.640 to do about

01:05:22.240 fake music.

01:05:24.540 So they're

01:05:24.940 drafting some

01:05:27.120 legislation, the

01:05:28.220 No Fakes

01:05:28.780 Act, that

01:05:30.140 would not allow

01:05:30.920 you to use

01:05:31.580 AI to

01:05:32.240 create music

01:05:33.180 that comes

01:05:34.620 too closely

01:05:35.300 from any

01:05:35.820 specific artist.

01:05:37.680 And I guess

01:05:38.180 this became

01:05:38.780 more important

01:05:39.400 because it

01:05:40.160 was a gigantic

01:05:41.000 viral video

01:05:41.880 that went

01:05:42.200 around of

01:05:42.760 some fakes

01:05:43.440 of Drake

01:05:45.300 and The

01:05:47.140 Weeknd.

01:05:48.420 Drake.

01:05:50.240 Now, suppose

01:05:51.060 you would

01:05:51.360 ask me,

01:05:53.060 Scott, it

01:05:55.840 looks like

01:05:56.220 we're entering

01:05:56.660 an age

01:05:57.160 where AI

01:05:57.700 will pretend

01:05:58.380 to be real

01:05:59.120 people and

01:06:00.060 real performers.

01:06:02.060 Who would

01:06:02.580 be the

01:06:03.100 first artist

01:06:04.380 you would

01:06:05.820 want to

01:06:06.440 copy?

01:06:07.460 Well, you

01:06:08.400 don't want

01:06:08.760 it to be

01:06:09.060 an artist

01:06:09.500 who is so

01:06:11.560 unpredictable

01:06:12.320 and good

01:06:13.060 that you

01:06:13.960 don't know

01:06:14.300 what they're

01:06:14.660 going to

01:06:14.900 do.

01:06:15.760 You don't

01:06:16.280 know what

01:06:16.580 they're going

01:06:16.860 to do.

01:06:18.000 Right?

01:06:18.760 Well, who

01:06:19.140 would be the

01:06:19.620 artist who

01:06:21.100 makes every

01:06:21.940 song sound

01:06:22.940 like the song

01:06:23.620 before?

01:06:24.080 I got

01:06:25.720 it.

01:06:27.000 Drake.

01:06:28.480 Yeah.

01:06:29.580 Would you

01:06:29.940 like me to

01:06:30.520 give my

01:06:30.860 impression of

01:06:31.560 every Drake

01:06:32.160 song?

01:06:34.620 Na na na na na

01:06:35.880 I'm falling

01:06:37.380 asleep as I

01:06:39.160 make my own

01:06:39.900 song.

01:06:41.120 I think I'm

01:06:41.840 bored.

01:06:42.960 I don't know

01:06:43.620 why anybody

01:06:44.260 listens to

01:06:44.780 this.

01:06:45.600 I am the

01:06:46.200 worst hip

01:06:47.640 hopper in

01:06:49.080 the world.

01:06:50.800 Even

01:06:51.100 though Scott

01:06:53.340 likes

01:06:53.800 hip hop

01:06:54.540 I like

01:06:55.860 the genre

01:06:56.420 but I

01:06:57.900 can't even

01:06:58.440 understand

01:06:59.120 why anybody

01:07:00.620 ever lessen

01:07:01.400 a drag.

01:07:03.560 I don't

01:07:04.220 get hip at

01:07:04.700 all.

01:07:05.760 Now,

01:07:06.540 let me be

01:07:07.480 consistent

01:07:08.000 with my

01:07:08.800 artistic

01:07:10.620 opinion.

01:07:13.320 Art

01:07:13.920 is subjective.

01:07:17.020 So the

01:07:17.440 fact that I

01:07:18.160 think Drake

01:07:18.700 has no

01:07:19.180 talent

01:07:19.500 whatsoever

01:07:20.020 is irrelevant

01:07:22.280 because that's

01:07:23.500 on me

01:07:23.940 because Drake

01:07:25.540 sells a

01:07:26.800 lot of

01:07:27.380 music.

01:07:28.760 That guy

01:07:29.560 sells a

01:07:30.200 lot of

01:07:30.720 music.

01:07:32.000 So what

01:07:32.340 can you

01:07:32.660 conclude about

01:07:33.380 that?

01:07:34.100 He's very

01:07:34.540 good.

01:07:36.540 I hate to

01:07:38.000 admit it,

01:07:39.060 but if you

01:07:39.560 sell that

01:07:40.080 much music

01:07:40.740 for that

01:07:41.500 many years

01:07:42.180 and people

01:07:43.100 are really

01:07:43.500 happy they

01:07:44.000 bought it,

01:07:45.040 he is a

01:07:45.620 great,

01:07:46.180 great artist.

01:07:46.800 that's just

01:07:49.060 the truth.

01:07:50.340 The way

01:07:50.800 you can

01:07:51.120 measure

01:07:51.440 great art

01:07:52.220 is people

01:07:53.360 want to

01:07:53.700 pay for

01:07:54.100 it.

01:07:54.840 Year after

01:07:55.520 year after

01:07:56.020 year,

01:07:56.260 they're going

01:07:56.460 to pay

01:07:56.660 for it.

01:07:57.620 And they

01:07:58.180 do.

01:07:58.840 They pay

01:07:59.180 for it.

01:07:59.720 So if

01:08:00.540 you use

01:08:00.940 the most

01:08:01.580 objective

01:08:02.080 and most

01:08:02.500 reasonable

01:08:02.920 standard,

01:08:03.560 and indeed

01:08:04.060 it's a

01:08:04.980 standard I

01:08:05.520 like applied

01:08:06.080 to me,

01:08:06.900 I don't

01:08:07.480 want you

01:08:07.760 to tell

01:08:08.020 me that

01:08:08.400 Dilbert is

01:08:09.060 good or

01:08:09.460 bad.

01:08:10.600 I want

01:08:11.260 you to

01:08:11.620 tell me

01:08:11.980 did people

01:08:12.460 subscribe to

01:08:13.280 it,

01:08:13.580 did they

01:08:13.820 buy the

01:08:14.140 book,

01:08:14.520 did they

01:08:14.760 want the 0.55

01:08:15.100 calendar.

01:08:16.800 Because that

01:08:17.060 tells me

01:08:17.480 what I

01:08:17.760 need now.

01:08:18.920 I don't

01:08:19.420 need the

01:08:19.940 internal

01:08:21.340 thoughts.

01:08:22.820 So Drake

01:08:23.260 is one

01:08:23.940 of the

01:08:24.120 greatest

01:08:24.380 artists

01:08:24.740 of all

01:08:25.080 time.

01:08:26.440 But he's

01:08:29.360 probably

01:08:29.660 the easiest

01:08:30.220 to copy.

01:08:32.940 Is that

01:08:33.540 too far?

01:08:35.460 Would you

01:08:35.840 agree with

01:08:36.320 me that

01:08:36.640 he's got

01:08:36.960 to be

01:08:37.120 the easiest

01:08:37.580 one to

01:08:37.960 copy?

01:08:39.720 Yeah.

01:08:41.500 Anyway,

01:08:42.480 so no

01:08:42.960 offense to

01:08:43.440 Drake,

01:08:43.740 he's actually

01:08:44.160 great.

01:08:46.800 let's

01:08:48.100 see what

01:08:48.400 else is

01:08:48.700 going on.

01:08:51.760 Jack

01:08:52.240 Smith is

01:08:52.840 trying to

01:08:53.320 block

01:08:53.780 Trump's

01:08:54.660 defense

01:08:55.240 from

01:08:56.200 offering

01:08:56.720 any

01:08:57.160 defense.

01:09:00.160 That

01:09:00.620 doesn't

01:09:00.860 sound

01:09:01.100 real,

01:09:01.440 does it?

01:09:04.040 That

01:09:04.480 doesn't

01:09:04.760 sound like

01:09:05.160 it could

01:09:05.460 possibly be

01:09:06.240 real.

01:09:07.660 That in

01:09:08.420 public,

01:09:08.980 in front

01:09:09.280 of all

01:09:09.580 of us,

01:09:10.820 he's trying

01:09:11.200 to make

01:09:11.480 sure that

01:09:11.860 Trump

01:09:12.240 can't

01:09:12.980 give

01:09:13.540 a defense.

01:09:14.520 So one

01:09:17.400 of the

01:09:17.620 things that

01:09:18.100 he's trying

01:09:18.400 to block

01:09:18.900 the jury

01:09:19.380 from hearing

01:09:20.000 is that

01:09:21.000 Trump

01:09:21.260 requested

01:09:21.780 increased

01:09:22.420 capital

01:09:22.860 security

01:09:23.480 and was

01:09:23.920 denied.

01:09:26.220 Now,

01:09:26.820 if you

01:09:27.120 were on

01:09:27.380 the jury

01:09:27.880 and you

01:09:29.180 were trying

01:09:29.500 to figure

01:09:29.860 out if

01:09:30.300 Trump

01:09:30.660 were trying

01:09:31.700 to take

01:09:32.420 over the

01:09:32.860 country or

01:09:33.480 not,

01:09:34.740 you know,

01:09:34.960 is he an

01:09:35.420 insurrectionist?

01:09:37.860 Wouldn't

01:09:38.180 you want

01:09:38.580 to know

01:09:38.980 if he

01:09:40.140 had tried

01:09:40.520 to stop

01:09:41.020 the

01:09:41.220 insurrection?

01:09:41.700 and somebody

01:09:44.580 stopped him

01:09:45.160 from stopping

01:09:45.720 it?

01:09:46.900 I can't

01:09:47.620 imagine what

01:09:48.100 would be

01:09:48.360 more important.

01:09:49.940 Now,

01:09:50.520 since I'm

01:09:51.100 not a

01:09:51.420 lawyer and

01:09:51.880 I'm not

01:09:52.180 following this

01:09:52.720 as closely

01:09:53.280 as I

01:09:53.660 should,

01:09:54.840 am I

01:09:55.240 missing

01:09:55.540 the point

01:09:56.200 that because

01:09:57.780 Smith is

01:09:58.360 not charging

01:09:59.240 him for

01:09:59.680 insurrection,

01:10:00.900 which is

01:10:01.660 weird in

01:10:02.160 itself,

01:10:02.640 right?

01:10:03.920 Is that

01:10:04.260 true?

01:10:04.920 He's not

01:10:05.320 being charged

01:10:05.920 specifically

01:10:06.540 with insurrection?

01:10:08.440 If he's

01:10:09.140 not being

01:10:09.560 charged with

01:10:10.060 insurrection,

01:10:10.580 is that

01:10:11.920 the

01:10:12.140 justification

01:10:12.800 that Smith

01:10:13.340 is using

01:10:13.980 for why

01:10:15.180 he can't

01:10:15.720 defend himself

01:10:16.580 against a

01:10:17.160 charge for

01:10:17.620 insurrection?

01:10:20.340 Is that

01:10:20.940 what's

01:10:21.140 happening?

01:10:22.300 Because there's

01:10:22.960 got to be a

01:10:23.460 legal argument

01:10:24.100 for it,

01:10:24.560 right?

01:10:25.040 So he's

01:10:25.420 saying it's

01:10:25.760 just off

01:10:26.160 point.

01:10:28.580 But if I

01:10:29.420 were the

01:10:30.160 Trump defense,

01:10:30.940 I would

01:10:31.220 consider it

01:10:31.940 completely

01:10:32.480 on point

01:10:33.440 because it

01:10:34.620 suggests a

01:10:36.880 frame of

01:10:37.400 mind.

01:10:38.720 Now,

01:10:39.020 is the

01:10:40.580 what exactly

01:10:42.520 is the

01:10:42.820 charge against

01:10:43.380 Trump for

01:10:43.860 January 6th?

01:10:44.760 If it's

01:10:45.100 not

01:10:45.300 insurrection,

01:10:46.120 it's

01:10:46.520 inciting

01:10:46.980 violence?

01:10:48.640 What is

01:10:49.240 the charge?

01:10:51.560 See,

01:10:52.000 it's all

01:10:52.280 so sketchy

01:10:53.000 in lawfare

01:10:53.600 that I

01:10:53.960 can't even

01:10:54.300 hold it in

01:10:54.640 my head

01:10:54.900 with

01:10:55.060 obstruction.

01:10:56.840 So

01:10:57.060 charging him

01:10:57.660 with

01:10:57.860 obstructing

01:10:58.620 a government

01:10:59.300 process.

01:11:03.040 Don't you

01:11:03.660 think it

01:11:03.940 would be

01:11:04.400 relevant to

01:11:05.760 obstruction

01:11:06.300 obstruction

01:11:06.360 that he

01:11:07.620 tried to

01:11:09.660 make sure

01:11:10.020 the

01:11:10.200 obstruction

01:11:10.600 didn't

01:11:10.960 happen.

01:11:12.500 That's the

01:11:13.260 most relevant

01:11:13.800 thing in

01:11:14.200 the world.

01:11:17.260 That is

01:11:18.080 so relevant.

01:11:20.600 Now,

01:11:21.300 here's what

01:11:22.000 I take

01:11:23.900 from this.

01:11:25.320 I think

01:11:25.960 we all

01:11:26.340 understand

01:11:26.940 that the

01:11:27.540 legal system

01:11:28.320 is a

01:11:28.940 contest

01:11:30.120 where you're

01:11:30.820 fighting as

01:11:31.460 hard as

01:11:31.760 you can.

01:11:32.640 We all

01:11:33.360 understand and

01:11:34.200 we agree

01:11:34.760 that the

01:11:35.660 defense can

01:11:37.500 try everything

01:11:38.420 that's legal.

01:11:39.460 They can

01:11:39.840 maybe stretch 0.79

01:11:42.360 the truth.

01:11:43.300 They can

01:11:43.580 throw every

01:11:44.120 defense they

01:11:44.720 can because

01:11:45.940 we want

01:11:46.520 the best

01:11:47.440 defense.

01:11:48.960 We also

01:11:49.820 think that

01:11:50.520 the prosecutor

01:11:51.240 can do the

01:11:52.040 strongest

01:11:52.700 prosecution

01:11:53.480 that they

01:11:54.580 do because

01:11:55.220 you want

01:11:55.580 them to

01:11:55.860 do that

01:11:56.180 as well.

01:11:58.360 But isn't

01:11:59.900 there a

01:12:00.560 bit of an

01:12:01.020 ethical

01:12:01.340 problem if

01:12:02.640 your prosecutor

01:12:03.400 is trying to

01:12:04.180 take away

01:12:04.640 the defense

01:12:05.280 of the

01:12:05.640 defense?

01:12:07.260 That's a

01:12:07.960 little different

01:12:08.440 than trying

01:12:08.980 hard to

01:12:09.460 convict him.

01:12:11.520 That doesn't

01:12:12.340 even look

01:12:12.700 legitimate.

01:12:13.940 Not even a

01:12:14.520 little bit.

01:12:16.180 You know

01:12:17.500 in the

01:12:17.920 legal profession

01:12:19.040 there's the

01:12:19.700 concept that

01:12:21.260 if you

01:12:22.000 lied about

01:12:22.680 one thing,

01:12:24.980 if you

01:12:25.720 lied under

01:12:26.260 oath about

01:12:26.740 one thing,

01:12:28.000 the jury

01:12:28.520 is often

01:12:29.020 instructed

01:12:29.540 that they

01:12:31.020 can assume

01:12:32.140 that the

01:12:32.640 person is a

01:12:33.300 liar in

01:12:33.840 general and

01:12:35.020 may have

01:12:35.340 lied about

01:12:35.720 the other

01:12:36.060 things.

01:12:37.160 So a

01:12:37.500 lie about

01:12:37.900 one thing

01:12:38.480 in a

01:12:39.540 court setting

01:12:40.160 is reasonable

01:12:41.620 to extend

01:12:42.280 that to,

01:12:42.840 well,

01:12:43.080 maybe they're

01:12:43.620 a liar. 0.91

01:12:45.360 What would

01:12:46.040 you assume

01:12:47.080 about somebody

01:12:47.920 who's doing

01:12:48.340 something that,

01:12:49.420 at least to

01:12:49.860 our non-legal

01:12:50.840 minds,

01:12:51.860 looks obviously

01:12:52.740 corrupt?

01:12:53.220 if Jack

01:12:56.140 Smith would

01:12:56.820 do one

01:12:57.380 obviously

01:12:57.940 corrupt

01:12:58.400 thing,

01:12:59.680 preventing

01:13:00.080 Trump from

01:13:01.080 this part

01:13:02.520 of his

01:13:02.780 defense,

01:13:03.740 and by

01:13:04.120 the way,

01:13:05.060 if this

01:13:06.120 defense

01:13:06.600 actually

01:13:07.200 affected

01:13:08.100 Smith's

01:13:10.140 ability to

01:13:10.740 get the

01:13:11.040 prosecution,

01:13:12.340 then it

01:13:13.100 should be

01:13:13.520 him.

01:13:14.520 If it

01:13:15.260 doesn't

01:13:15.660 affect it,

01:13:17.340 then what's

01:13:17.800 the difference?

01:13:20.800 It just

01:13:21.540 looks illegitimate

01:13:22.380 to me.

01:13:23.920 So if

01:13:25.720 Jack

01:13:26.400 Smith can

01:13:26.860 do one

01:13:27.220 thing that

01:13:27.600 looks clearly

01:13:28.260 illegitimate,

01:13:29.680 it would be

01:13:30.360 reasonable to

01:13:31.160 assume that

01:13:31.720 the other

01:13:32.140 things he's

01:13:32.700 doing are

01:13:33.260 illegitimate.

01:13:34.340 And indeed,

01:13:34.800 they do look

01:13:35.300 illegitimate to

01:13:36.180 me.

01:13:38.380 All right.

01:13:40.680 Mike

01:13:41.200 Benz is

01:13:42.460 again showing

01:13:44.000 us who the

01:13:44.460 players are.

01:13:46.240 So let's

01:13:48.140 see.

01:13:48.420 So there

01:13:48.760 was a

01:13:49.200 group,

01:13:51.020 non-

01:13:51.740 non-government

01:13:52.940 group,

01:13:53.720 behind the

01:13:54.520 lawsuit that

01:13:55.500 removed Trump

01:13:56.120 from the

01:13:56.560 Colorado

01:13:56.900 ballot.

01:13:58.000 We think

01:13:58.340 that will

01:13:59.120 probably get

01:13:59.600 reversed.

01:14:00.620 But at

01:14:00.820 the moment,

01:14:01.260 Colorado

01:14:01.740 court said

01:14:03.220 Trump can't

01:14:03.740 be on the

01:14:04.060 ballot.

01:14:05.700 Who do

01:14:06.400 you think

01:14:06.620 is the

01:14:06.920 biggest

01:14:07.160 donor to

01:14:08.760 the group

01:14:09.340 that removed

01:14:10.620 through the

01:14:11.900 courts Trump

01:14:12.960 from the

01:14:13.420 ballot?

01:14:14.700 George Soros.

01:14:16.480 And the

01:14:16.720 head of the

01:14:17.080 group says

01:14:17.680 that on

01:14:18.600 camera.

01:14:19.280 So it's

01:14:20.860 recorded.

01:14:23.200 But it

01:14:23.800 says that

01:14:24.440 Soros has 0.98

01:14:26.140 never tried

01:14:26.880 to get

01:14:27.440 them to

01:14:27.980 do anything

01:14:29.020 specific.

01:14:30.480 So she

01:14:31.200 wants you

01:14:31.580 to know

01:14:31.940 that George

01:14:32.460 Soros and

01:14:33.540 nobody in

01:14:34.200 his organization

01:14:34.920 ever said

01:14:36.120 do this or

01:14:36.760 don't do

01:14:37.080 that.

01:14:37.420 They just

01:14:37.680 gave them

01:14:38.020 money.

01:14:38.840 So that's

01:14:39.260 fine,

01:14:39.560 right?

01:14:42.840 No.

01:14:43.900 No.

01:14:45.040 Because

01:14:45.440 this is a

01:14:47.520 Democrat who

01:14:48.240 used to

01:14:48.680 work for

01:14:49.240 high-ranking

01:14:50.080 Democrats.

01:14:51.420 It's

01:14:51.700 obviously one

01:14:52.460 of these

01:14:52.740 Democrat

01:14:53.220 cut-out

01:14:53.680 groups.

01:14:54.700 Everybody

01:14:55.000 knows what

01:14:55.820 they're going

01:14:56.160 to do.

01:14:57.060 You don't

01:14:57.480 have to tell

01:14:57.960 them what

01:14:58.280 to do

01:14:58.560 because they

01:14:59.280 formed to

01:14:59.840 do the

01:15:00.160 thing you

01:15:00.500 wanted to

01:15:00.900 do, to

01:15:02.540 be dirty

01:15:03.840 tricksters

01:15:04.440 against

01:15:04.800 Republicans.

01:15:06.380 So she

01:15:08.760 said to

01:15:09.560 an interviewer,

01:15:10.360 I used to

01:15:10.860 be political.

01:15:11.480 So she's

01:15:13.780 trying to

01:15:14.140 tell people

01:15:14.660 that she

01:15:15.440 used to

01:15:15.780 work in

01:15:16.120 politics,

01:15:16.720 but now

01:15:17.620 she's in

01:15:18.140 this

01:15:18.420 non-government

01:15:19.480 role as

01:15:21.180 a Democrat

01:15:22.000 who used

01:15:22.420 to work

01:15:22.720 for high-ranking

01:15:23.420 Democrats,

01:15:24.340 who's taking

01:15:25.100 money from

01:15:25.660 Soros to

01:15:27.000 take Trump

01:15:27.520 off the

01:15:27.920 ballot.

01:15:29.120 But you

01:15:29.500 know what?

01:15:30.360 She used

01:15:30.840 to be

01:15:31.160 political.

01:15:33.420 Yep.

01:15:34.600 Yep, she 0.91

01:15:35.220 used to be

01:15:35.640 political.

01:15:37.500 There was

01:15:38.220 that one

01:15:38.560 time when

01:15:39.000 she was

01:15:39.220 political.

01:15:41.480 It's

01:15:42.640 exactly what

01:15:43.500 it looks

01:15:43.820 like.

01:15:45.040 It is

01:15:45.380 exactly what

01:15:46.180 it looks

01:15:46.480 like.

01:15:48.920 Amazing.

01:15:50.920 All right.

01:15:54.500 And in

01:15:55.680 her own

01:15:56.200 documents,

01:15:57.900 they call

01:15:59.140 President

01:15:59.660 Trump the

01:16:00.500 most corrupt

01:16:01.400 president in

01:16:02.080 American history.

01:16:03.420 But she's 0.97

01:16:03.820 not political.

01:16:06.480 There's a

01:16:07.220 surgeon who's

01:16:07.840 complaining that

01:16:08.700 DEI has

01:16:10.020 infected

01:16:10.440 medicine.

01:16:11.480 and led

01:16:12.320 to an

01:16:12.820 erosion

01:16:13.600 of quality

01:16:14.400 of their

01:16:14.700 care.

01:16:20.360 So we

01:16:22.120 had a

01:16:22.400 system of

01:16:23.080 medicine that

01:16:24.400 guarantees you

01:16:25.360 get less

01:16:25.880 good medical

01:16:26.640 treatment.

01:16:27.620 Because they're

01:16:28.000 going to value

01:16:28.460 diversity over

01:16:29.460 capability.

01:16:31.180 Certainly in

01:16:31.840 the medical

01:16:33.300 schools they

01:16:34.000 do that.

01:16:34.620 But even

01:16:35.420 after medical

01:16:36.080 school,

01:16:36.500 apparently

01:16:36.740 they're doing

01:16:37.160 that.

01:16:38.040 That's

01:16:38.360 consistent

01:16:38.820 with my

01:16:39.180 theme.

01:16:41.480 So let's

01:16:47.640 see.

01:16:48.580 Here's

01:16:48.840 something that

01:16:49.400 Vivek said

01:16:50.100 that I

01:16:50.620 feel like you

01:16:51.320 couldn't have

01:16:51.720 said two

01:16:52.200 years ago.

01:16:53.140 And you

01:16:53.460 couldn't even

01:16:53.880 say it unless

01:16:54.500 you're as

01:16:55.140 good at

01:16:55.460 defending

01:16:55.740 yourself as

01:16:56.380 Vivek is.

01:16:57.440 He posted,

01:16:58.480 everyone agrees

01:16:59.620 that affirmative

01:17:00.140 action in

01:17:00.820 the NBA

01:17:01.300 would ruin

01:17:01.940 basketball and

01:17:03.360 affirmative action

01:17:04.220 in the NFL

01:17:04.800 would ruin

01:17:05.320 football.

01:17:06.360 Turns out that

01:17:07.160 affirmative action

01:17:08.000 in the sciences

01:17:08.600 has a similar

01:17:09.400 effect.

01:17:10.560 This should

01:17:11.080 surprise no

01:17:11.860 one.

01:17:12.600 Well, when he

01:17:13.380 says this should

01:17:14.000 surprise no

01:17:14.660 one, how do I

01:17:16.220 say that?

01:17:16.820 The way I

01:17:18.120 say it is

01:17:18.680 design is

01:17:19.380 destiny.

01:17:23.520 Design is

01:17:24.320 destiny.

01:17:25.420 So they have a

01:17:25.900 design that

01:17:26.520 guarantees they'll

01:17:27.260 get less good

01:17:29.000 medical outcomes.

01:17:30.820 But what about

01:17:31.300 the NFL and

01:17:32.100 the NBA?

01:17:33.500 What does

01:17:34.260 their design

01:17:35.080 guarantee?

01:17:36.560 The best

01:17:37.300 players.

01:17:38.820 Yeah.

01:17:39.400 Yeah, the

01:17:39.760 NBA and the

01:17:40.500 NFL are

01:17:41.860 designed to

01:17:42.540 get the best

01:17:43.020 players.

01:17:43.360 All right.

01:17:48.340 Here's one

01:17:49.280 argument for

01:17:50.720 Vivek over

01:17:51.640 Trump.

01:17:52.840 I'm pretty

01:17:53.620 sure that a

01:17:54.160 lot of the

01:17:54.800 MAGA people

01:17:55.460 are sick and

01:17:57.380 tired of

01:17:57.960 diversity,

01:17:58.720 equity, and

01:17:59.420 inclusion and

01:18:01.720 the negative

01:18:02.740 it has done

01:18:03.340 to the

01:18:03.600 country.

01:18:04.580 And, you

01:18:04.880 know, Trump

01:18:05.260 opposes those

01:18:06.600 things too.

01:18:07.500 But he doesn't

01:18:08.100 oppose them

01:18:08.640 nearly as

01:18:09.800 elegantly as

01:18:11.660 Vivek does.

01:18:12.420 So I would

01:18:13.560 say that

01:18:14.020 depending where

01:18:14.860 you place

01:18:15.640 your priorities

01:18:16.800 for getting

01:18:18.300 rid of

01:18:18.660 wokeness,

01:18:20.220 nobody's ever

01:18:21.660 made a better

01:18:22.220 argument than

01:18:22.900 Vivek.

01:18:23.760 And Trump's

01:18:24.500 not the one

01:18:24.960 to make that

01:18:25.440 argument.

01:18:26.840 Because he's

01:18:28.980 not so much

01:18:29.540 the explainer

01:18:31.640 as he is the

01:18:32.540 persuader.

01:18:33.880 It's a different

01:18:34.340 skill.

01:18:36.740 All right.

01:18:39.340 And then

01:18:40.060 Vivek talking

01:18:40.800 about January

01:18:41.380 6th.

01:18:42.860 So he's

01:18:43.400 involved on

01:18:44.020 this from,

01:18:45.400 you know,

01:18:46.140 his first

01:18:46.720 impression was

01:18:47.400 it was all

01:18:47.780 bad.

01:18:48.880 But the

01:18:49.460 more he

01:18:49.720 finds out,

01:18:50.400 the more

01:18:50.700 his opinion

01:18:51.280 changes.

01:18:51.820 So listen

01:18:52.120 to this.

01:18:52.960 So Vivek

01:18:53.440 said this

01:18:53.840 about January

01:18:54.340 6th.

01:18:55.200 If you'd

01:18:55.840 have told

01:18:56.080 me nearly

01:18:56.900 three years

01:18:57.400 ago when I

01:18:57.880 was just

01:18:58.280 a CEO that

01:18:59.440 January 6th

01:19:00.100 was an

01:19:00.420 inside job,

01:19:01.840 I would

01:19:02.500 have said

01:19:02.760 that's crazy

01:19:03.320 talk.

01:19:03.720 It's not.

01:19:05.240 There is

01:19:05.580 now clear

01:19:06.220 evidence that

01:19:07.380 there was at

01:19:07.940 the very least

01:19:09.300 entrapment of

01:19:10.560 peaceful

01:19:10.980 protesters.

01:19:11.600 similar to

01:19:12.900 the fake

01:19:13.580 Gretchen

01:19:14.060 Whitmer

01:19:14.360 kidnapping

01:19:14.880 plot and

01:19:15.540 countless

01:19:15.860 other

01:19:16.200 cases.

01:19:16.660 I think the

01:19:17.500 Brendan

01:19:17.820 Straka

01:19:18.360 situation

01:19:19.100 tells you

01:19:20.660 it's

01:19:20.820 illegitimate.

01:19:21.420 The FBI

01:19:23.800 won't admit

01:19:24.880 how many

01:19:25.280 undercover

01:19:25.720 officers

01:19:26.280 were in

01:19:26.720 the field

01:19:27.020 on January

01:19:27.560 6th.

01:19:28.340 Capitol

01:19:28.680 police on

01:19:29.300 one hand

01:19:29.780 fired

01:19:30.080 rubber

01:19:30.380 bullets and

01:19:30.960 explosives

01:19:31.420 into a

01:19:32.320 peaceful

01:19:32.560 crowd who

01:19:34.280 they then

01:19:34.740 willingly

01:19:35.160 later allowed

01:19:35.960 into the

01:19:36.360 Capitol.

01:19:37.220 That doesn't

01:19:37.940 add up and

01:19:38.960 the actual

01:19:39.320 evidence turns

01:19:39.980 the prior

01:19:40.380 narrative upside

01:19:41.100 down.

01:19:41.900 If the

01:19:42.220 deep state

01:19:42.660 is willing

01:19:43.100 to manufacture

01:19:44.020 a quote

01:19:45.220 insurrection

01:19:46.040 to take

01:19:47.000 down his

01:19:47.400 political

01:19:47.840 opponents,

01:19:48.700 they can

01:19:49.320 do

01:19:49.500 anything.

01:19:51.100 Once you

01:19:51.580 see it,

01:19:52.260 you can't

01:19:52.780 unsee it.

01:19:54.440 That is

01:19:54.860 correct,

01:19:55.280 Vivek.

01:19:56.100 January 6th

01:19:57.340 has always

01:19:58.120 been an

01:19:58.880 op and

01:20:00.380 not by

01:20:00.860 Republicans.

01:20:01.380 It was a

01:20:02.780 Democrat op

01:20:03.520 from the

01:20:03.920 beginning and

01:20:05.400 now it's

01:20:06.660 obvious.

01:20:08.020 But if you

01:20:09.360 get outside of

01:20:10.140 our little

01:20:10.780 political bubble,

01:20:12.380 the bubble of

01:20:13.100 people who watch

01:20:13.860 live streams like

01:20:14.680 this and pay

01:20:15.200 attention,

01:20:16.720 nobody knows

01:20:17.400 this stuff.

01:20:19.100 Nobody really

01:20:19.900 knows who the

01:20:20.480 players are.

01:20:21.300 They don't

01:20:21.520 know who

01:20:22.440 owns what

01:20:22.940 magazine.

01:20:24.000 They don't

01:20:24.320 know which

01:20:24.660 ones are

01:20:25.280 typically organs

01:20:26.680 of the CIA.

01:20:28.360 They don't

01:20:28.640 know any of

01:20:29.020 that.

01:20:29.820 They're just

01:20:30.200 reading what

01:20:30.700 their team

01:20:31.100 says and

01:20:31.540 then adopting

01:20:32.060 that opinion.

01:20:33.560 But Vivek

01:20:34.380 looks like he's

01:20:35.460 just ready to

01:20:36.200 rip the cover

01:20:37.000 off the ball.

01:20:38.580 So he's

01:20:39.040 calling out

01:20:39.540 climate change

01:20:40.300 as a hoax.

01:20:42.020 He's saying

01:20:42.660 that DEI

01:20:43.460 is just

01:20:44.680 unproductive

01:20:46.460 garbage,

01:20:47.720 racism basically.

01:20:49.040 And he's

01:20:49.360 saying that

01:20:49.660 January 6th

01:20:51.300 looks more

01:20:52.100 like a hoax

01:20:53.140 than a

01:20:54.880 real thing.

01:20:57.140 Those are

01:20:57.820 some bold

01:20:58.680 things to

01:20:59.280 say.

01:21:00.600 And you

01:21:00.920 know what?

01:21:03.080 MSNBC

01:21:03.640 can't touch

01:21:04.440 him now.

01:21:05.740 Because if

01:21:06.160 they bring

01:21:06.540 him in,

01:21:06.860 they have to

01:21:07.260 ask him

01:21:07.660 these questions.

01:21:09.240 And the

01:21:09.600 problem is

01:21:10.180 he has

01:21:10.520 answers.

01:21:12.520 You know

01:21:12.820 the old

01:21:13.200 lawyer thing?

01:21:13.800 Don't ask

01:21:14.800 a question

01:21:15.320 if you

01:21:15.900 don't know

01:21:16.180 what the

01:21:16.420 answer will

01:21:16.840 be.

01:21:17.620 Well,

01:21:17.840 they don't

01:21:18.140 know what

01:21:18.520 the answer

01:21:18.860 is going

01:21:19.120 to be if

01:21:19.380 they ask

01:21:19.720 him.

01:21:21.360 So you

01:21:21.800 got,

01:21:22.100 you know,

01:21:22.260 MSNB is

01:21:23.000 mostly failed

01:21:23.920 lawyers who

01:21:24.620 became online

01:21:25.680 hosts.

01:21:26.980 They're mostly

01:21:27.520 lawyers,

01:21:28.280 right?

01:21:29.360 It's like I

01:21:29.780 think half of

01:21:30.260 their hosts

01:21:30.620 are lawyers.

01:21:33.560 No lawyer

01:21:34.540 is going to

01:21:35.500 bring Vivek on

01:21:36.520 and have him

01:21:37.680 dismantle MSNBC's

01:21:39.260 entire narrative.

01:21:40.580 You know,

01:21:41.160 that would be

01:21:42.340 bad, but

01:21:43.220 you could

01:21:43.560 bring on

01:21:44.460 other

01:21:44.720 Republicans.

01:21:46.020 You know,

01:21:46.120 you could

01:21:46.380 bring on

01:21:46.760 a lot of

01:21:47.280 Congress

01:21:48.300 critters and

01:21:49.620 they wouldn't

01:21:50.120 embarrass MSNBC.

01:21:51.860 They would

01:21:52.240 just do their 0.54

01:21:52.760 little talking

01:21:53.320 points and

01:21:53.940 MSNBC would

01:21:55.120 embarrass them

01:21:56.200 after they

01:21:56.640 were off the

01:21:57.120 air.

01:21:58.220 Wouldn't

01:21:58.520 leave a

01:21:58.860 mark.

01:21:59.780 But Vivek

01:22:00.260 will leave

01:22:00.580 a mark.

01:22:02.300 So I

01:22:02.920 think they

01:22:03.220 fear him

01:22:03.680 at this

01:22:03.980 point.

01:22:04.380 They should.

01:22:04.720 Let me

01:22:10.280 summarize this.

01:22:11.800 I think

01:22:12.100 Trump speaks

01:22:12.960 like his

01:22:13.440 base, and

01:22:15.100 that's what

01:22:15.460 makes him

01:22:15.820 so persuasive.

01:22:17.140 When people

01:22:17.880 listen to

01:22:18.400 him, even

01:22:18.880 though he's

01:22:19.840 a billionaire

01:22:20.260 and you

01:22:20.780 might have

01:22:21.920 a regular

01:22:22.400 job, you

01:22:23.360 still say,

01:22:24.060 he's talking

01:22:25.000 like me.

01:22:26.260 Like the

01:22:26.580 words coming

01:22:27.100 out of his

01:22:27.460 mouth, it 1.00

01:22:28.140 sounds like

01:22:28.560 I could have

01:22:28.940 said that.

01:22:30.020 So that

01:22:30.360 really is a

01:22:31.420 bonding thing

01:22:32.140 for his

01:22:32.600 base.

01:22:32.940 But Vivek

01:22:34.900 doesn't

01:22:35.240 speak like

01:22:35.740 his base.

01:22:37.060 You know

01:22:37.340 what Vivek

01:22:37.940 speaks like?

01:22:39.920 Before I

01:22:40.740 tell you my

01:22:41.260 opinion, you

01:22:42.180 tell me what

01:22:42.700 Vivek speaks

01:22:43.560 like.

01:22:45.080 Trump speaks

01:22:46.000 like the

01:22:46.360 base.

01:22:47.000 What does

01:22:47.320 Vivek speak

01:22:47.960 like?

01:22:51.060 Some say

01:22:51.860 a professor.

01:22:53.120 Some say

01:22:53.600 a car

01:22:53.940 salesman,

01:22:54.600 pastor,

01:22:55.980 father,

01:22:58.020 president,

01:22:59.520 dad,

01:23:00.180 preacher,

01:23:01.540 highly educated,

01:23:02.560 grad student,

01:23:03.720 chad,

01:23:04.480 executive.

01:23:07.820 All right,

01:23:08.120 I'm going to

01:23:08.360 give you a

01:23:08.840 lawyer.

01:23:09.560 I'm going to

01:23:09.860 give you the

01:23:10.160 right answer.

01:23:11.360 All of your

01:23:11.860 answers are

01:23:12.340 pretty good.

01:23:13.520 All of your

01:23:14.000 answers are

01:23:14.460 pretty good.

01:23:15.440 CEO is a

01:23:16.080 good answer.

01:23:16.980 Here's the

01:23:17.360 right answer.

01:23:19.160 He speaks

01:23:19.660 like the

01:23:20.060 leader you

01:23:20.500 want.

01:23:23.780 I don't

01:23:24.340 want somebody

01:23:24.880 who's only

01:23:25.320 as smart

01:23:25.720 as me.

01:23:28.200 I don't

01:23:28.760 want somebody

01:23:29.240 who talks

01:23:29.620 like me.

01:23:30.020 I want

01:23:31.540 somebody who

01:23:31.920 talks better

01:23:32.380 than me.

01:23:33.560 I want

01:23:34.200 somebody who

01:23:34.780 can take my

01:23:35.440 exact opinion

01:23:36.340 on climate

01:23:37.140 change and

01:23:38.760 then go on

01:23:39.300 television and

01:23:40.160 explain my

01:23:41.120 opinion, my

01:23:42.080 opinion, better

01:23:43.780 than I can

01:23:44.520 explain it.

01:23:46.940 That's what I

01:23:47.660 want.

01:23:48.440 I want somebody

01:23:49.480 who understands

01:23:51.500 economics better

01:23:53.280 than I do.

01:23:54.640 I don't want

01:23:55.160 somebody who

01:23:56.080 talks the same

01:23:56.840 way I talk

01:23:57.440 about economics.

01:23:58.140 I want him

01:23:59.020 to go on

01:23:59.600 and promote

01:24:01.280 essentially my

01:24:02.320 point of

01:24:02.720 view, but

01:24:04.540 better than I

01:24:05.180 do it.

01:24:06.120 And I do it

01:24:06.900 pretty well.

01:24:08.480 But he is

01:24:09.760 better.

01:24:10.680 I hate to say

01:24:11.600 it, but he's

01:24:12.560 better at it.

01:24:13.840 That's not easy

01:24:14.620 for me to say.

01:24:16.600 I mean, I don't

01:24:17.100 know if you're

01:24:17.540 catching this, but

01:24:18.360 I'm saying that

01:24:20.180 somebody is a

01:24:20.740 better communicator

01:24:21.780 than I am.

01:24:23.860 I don't say

01:24:24.660 that a lot.

01:24:26.120 I'm pretty

01:24:26.780 cocky.

01:24:28.140 Pretty cocky

01:24:29.260 in that

01:24:30.300 particular domain.

01:24:32.100 I don't say

01:24:32.560 that a lot, but

01:24:33.100 he's better.

01:24:34.160 Yeah, he has

01:24:34.620 more communication

01:24:35.800 skills than

01:24:36.660 any politician

01:24:38.380 I've ever

01:24:38.800 seen.

01:24:39.640 Now, Trump

01:24:40.260 is still

01:24:40.640 Trump, right?

01:24:42.060 So I don't

01:24:42.880 like to get

01:24:43.360 into comparing

01:24:44.160 them directly.

01:24:45.920 And the

01:24:46.120 reason I don't

01:24:46.680 compare them

01:24:47.220 directly is I

01:24:47.960 believe Trump

01:24:48.560 has earned

01:24:49.280 icon status.

01:24:52.900 There's some

01:24:53.560 things you don't

01:24:54.080 compare things

01:24:54.680 to.

01:24:55.840 Comparing

01:24:56.260 something to

01:24:56.920 Trump, it's

01:24:59.940 a waste of

01:25:00.480 energy.

01:25:01.620 There's only

01:25:02.040 one of it.

01:25:03.300 He is what

01:25:03.800 he is, and

01:25:04.340 that's just the

01:25:05.220 end of the

01:25:05.540 story.

01:25:06.560 It's the same 0.53

01:25:06.940 reason I say

01:25:07.420 don't compare

01:25:08.880 things to the

01:25:09.500 Holocaust. 0.77

01:25:10.980 There's some

01:25:11.760 things that

01:25:13.200 just don't

01:25:14.400 compare anything.

01:25:15.720 You can talk

01:25:16.320 about it, but

01:25:18.720 to compare

01:25:19.540 his communication

01:25:20.720 style to

01:25:21.520 evake is

01:25:22.200 wrong question.

01:25:23.300 wrong question.

01:25:26.540 Yeah.

01:25:27.240 All right.

01:25:29.160 Bill

01:25:29.600 Belusian at

01:25:30.600 the border

01:25:31.020 says that I

01:25:32.900 guess Secretary

01:25:33.700 Mayorkas came 1.00

01:25:35.320 back and said

01:25:36.160 you got some

01:25:37.120 challenges down

01:25:37.900 there, but

01:25:39.320 they're really

01:25:40.380 happy that

01:25:40.860 Mexico is 0.51

01:25:41.700 stepping up

01:25:42.520 their commitment

01:25:43.000 to help.

01:25:44.760 So good.

01:25:45.980 That's a good

01:25:46.720 job.

01:25:47.080 So Mayorkas 1.00

01:25:47.720 went and met

01:25:49.200 with the

01:25:49.480 President

01:25:49.860 Labrador of

01:25:51.140 Mexico and

01:25:52.340 got this

01:25:52.800 commitment for

01:25:53.480 lots of

01:25:53.960 Mexican help.

01:25:55.440 So we're

01:25:56.240 all set,

01:25:56.740 right?

01:25:57.920 All good.

01:25:59.180 Border's fixed.

01:26:00.760 Well, not

01:26:01.220 according to

01:26:01.960 Fox News

01:26:02.700 Bill

01:26:03.000 Belusian,

01:26:04.060 who spends

01:26:04.660 a great deal

01:26:05.320 of time down

01:26:05.880 on the border

01:26:06.360 and is

01:26:07.080 probably the

01:26:08.400 strongest

01:26:08.720 reporter from

01:26:09.540 that area.

01:26:10.740 And Bill

01:26:11.080 Belusian says

01:26:11.720 about that,

01:26:12.780 continuous

01:26:13.300 efforts.

01:26:14.480 What efforts?

01:26:15.900 Mexico is 0.51

01:26:16.640 enabling the

01:26:17.320 chaos at the

01:26:17.920 border by

01:26:18.680 mass issuing

01:26:19.500 humanitarian

01:26:20.600 visas to

01:26:21.460 migrants that 0.99

01:26:22.540 allow them

01:26:23.060 to travel

01:26:23.520 through Mexico

01:26:24.180 straight to

01:26:24.800 the U.S.

01:26:25.220 border.

01:26:25.820 Then they

01:26:26.380 discard the

01:26:27.060 visas on the

01:26:27.720 ground when

01:26:28.420 they cross

01:26:28.880 illegally.

01:26:30.200 And then he

01:26:30.520 says,

01:26:31.180 and the

01:26:31.420 trains?

01:26:32.660 And the

01:26:32.960 trains?

01:26:33.900 Mexico is 0.51

01:26:34.480 running like

01:26:35.040 train loads

01:26:35.780 of migrants 0.99

01:26:36.940 with visas that

01:26:38.520 they issued to

01:26:39.080 the border.

01:26:40.280 So he's like,

01:26:41.040 what progress?

01:26:42.420 What

01:26:42.680 commitments?

01:26:45.140 All right.

01:26:46.740 Have I

01:26:47.660 completed my

01:26:49.240 theme?

01:26:50.600 My theme

01:26:52.280 is that

01:26:53.040 our current

01:26:53.620 systems in

01:26:54.440 this country

01:26:55.000 are by

01:26:56.300 design,

01:26:57.200 not by

01:26:57.640 intention,

01:26:59.020 not by

01:26:59.440 intention,

01:27:00.840 but certainly

01:27:01.380 by the way

01:27:02.000 they're designed,

01:27:03.360 they guarantee

01:27:04.120 lower capability

01:27:05.600 of future

01:27:06.560 citizens.

01:27:07.920 They're making

01:27:08.420 us less

01:27:09.400 capable,

01:27:10.400 less educated,

01:27:12.040 more divided,

01:27:13.960 and it's

01:27:15.200 everything.

01:27:16.540 It's not just

01:27:17.620 education,

01:27:18.200 it's not

01:27:18.760 just

01:27:19.100 corporations,

01:27:20.120 not just

01:27:20.960 government,

01:27:21.880 it's

01:27:22.860 everything.

01:27:24.380 And I

01:27:24.600 think that's

01:27:24.980 why you

01:27:25.240 need a

01:27:25.520 Vivek.

01:27:27.520 Right?

01:27:30.320 If you

01:27:31.320 want,

01:27:31.840 well, let me

01:27:32.240 give you an

01:27:32.560 example.

01:27:34.260 So we're

01:27:34.920 all watching

01:27:35.380 Argentina,

01:27:36.260 they got

01:27:36.580 their new

01:27:36.960 president,

01:27:38.020 Mille,

01:27:38.880 and he's

01:27:39.600 just a

01:27:41.440 crazy guy

01:27:43.120 in a good

01:27:43.660 way.

01:27:44.320 Right?

01:27:44.480 He's changing

01:27:44.960 things,

01:27:45.540 he's getting

01:27:46.340 rid of

01:27:46.660 departments,

01:27:47.400 he's

01:27:47.600 streamlining

01:27:48.140 things,

01:27:48.740 he's bringing

01:27:49.100 free markets

01:27:49.760 back,

01:27:50.720 and all

01:27:51.000 that.

01:27:51.640 Now, if

01:27:52.040 you say to

01:27:52.480 yourself,

01:27:53.360 what is it

01:27:53.880 that makes

01:27:54.280 him so

01:27:54.680 strong as

01:27:56.260 a politician?

01:27:57.640 And you

01:27:57.900 probably have

01:27:58.260 lots of

01:27:58.620 answers.

01:27:59.180 You say,

01:27:59.420 well, he

01:28:00.420 has a real

01:28:00.840 good broad

01:28:01.460 background,

01:28:02.380 he was a

01:28:02.940 popular athlete,

01:28:04.000 but he's

01:28:04.280 also an

01:28:04.680 economist,

01:28:05.700 he's a

01:28:06.040 wild man,

01:28:06.720 he's got a

01:28:07.160 look with

01:28:07.640 his hair,

01:28:08.680 he communicates

01:28:09.520 in a certain

01:28:09.880 way.

01:28:10.060 So you'd

01:28:10.300 have all

01:28:11.020 these reasons.

01:28:12.300 But there's

01:28:12.720 one thing he

01:28:13.520 has,

01:28:14.080 that not

01:28:15.780 everybody can

01:28:16.500 duplicate.

01:28:18.420 Well, actually

01:28:19.260 a lot of

01:28:19.620 things.

01:28:20.080 But one

01:28:20.480 that stands

01:28:20.940 out,

01:28:22.200 he's young.

01:28:25.200 How old

01:28:25.820 is he?

01:28:27.700 Give me

01:28:28.260 his age.

01:28:29.620 President

01:28:30.140 of Argentina

01:28:31.040 is 40s?

01:28:33.400 Is he

01:28:34.000 pushing 50

01:28:34.740 or no?

01:28:36.060 Early

01:28:36.460 40s?

01:28:38.300 He looks

01:28:38.940 like he's

01:28:39.320 mid-40s,

01:28:40.740 I'm guessing.

01:28:43.080 Right.

01:28:43.940 Yeah,

01:28:44.160 under 50,

01:28:45.440 I think you

01:28:46.520 can still

01:28:46.920 shake things

01:28:47.500 up.

01:28:49.000 Over

01:28:49.480 70?

01:28:50.840 Good luck.

01:28:53.460 Yeah,

01:28:53.740 good luck.

01:28:54.880 I don't

01:28:55.580 see anybody

01:28:57.380 in their

01:28:57.780 70s

01:28:58.480 ripping 0.97

01:28:59.820 something out

01:29:00.460 by the

01:29:00.780 root.

01:29:02.020 By the time

01:29:02.420 you get to

01:29:02.780 your 70s,

01:29:03.420 you're like,

01:29:03.760 well,

01:29:04.540 we could

01:29:04.940 trim that

01:29:05.460 tree and

01:29:05.860 keep it.

01:29:07.620 You know,

01:29:07.840 you need to

01:29:08.560 be a certain

01:29:09.220 age.

01:29:09.720 He's

01:29:12.560 54,

01:29:13.300 somebody says.

01:29:14.100 I'm seeing

01:29:14.400 53.

01:29:15.160 That would

01:29:15.540 have been

01:29:15.760 my guess.

01:29:17.220 Yeah,

01:29:17.500 I would have

01:29:18.080 put him

01:29:18.400 early 50s,

01:29:19.220 actually.

01:29:20.500 But early

01:29:21.020 50s,

01:29:21.460 still young

01:29:21.860 enough.

01:29:24.020 Still young

01:29:24.760 enough.

01:29:26.340 He's got the

01:29:27.100 fire to

01:29:27.660 change things

01:29:28.340 fundamentally.

01:29:29.100 I just don't

01:29:29.520 think older

01:29:29.980 people change

01:29:30.660 things fundamentally.

01:29:32.120 And that's

01:29:32.620 another

01:29:33.100 Vivek

01:29:34.700 advantage.

01:29:35.760 Now,

01:29:35.920 the other

01:29:36.160 Vivek advantage

01:29:36.920 is if you

01:29:37.600 don't like

01:29:38.060 wokeness,

01:29:39.700 and I

01:29:40.020 know that

01:29:40.440 on the

01:29:40.900 right,

01:29:41.460 that's a

01:29:41.840 big deal,

01:29:42.940 who can

01:29:43.780 rail against

01:29:44.540 wokeness

01:29:45.120 more effectively?

01:29:46.780 If Trump

01:29:47.660 does it,

01:29:48.680 and you

01:29:49.100 support Trump,

01:29:50.000 what are

01:29:50.380 you?

01:29:51.400 A white 0.93

01:29:51.760 supremacist.

01:29:53.640 Right?

01:29:54.500 Even if you're

01:29:55.080 not white,

01:29:56.140 you're still a

01:29:56.780 white supremacist

01:29:57.520 if you support

01:29:58.600 Trump.

01:29:59.340 What if

01:30:00.080 you support

01:30:00.880 Vivek,

01:30:01.820 and he

01:30:02.600 goes hard

01:30:03.260 to dismantle

01:30:04.220 DEI?

01:30:05.360 Are you a

01:30:06.240 white supremacist?

01:30:07.780 Well,

01:30:08.180 now it's a

01:30:08.700 little harder

01:30:09.060 argument to

01:30:09.680 make,

01:30:09.900 isn't it?

01:30:10.940 Because you're

01:30:11.420 saying,

01:30:11.860 well,

01:30:13.000 he's brown.

01:30:15.340 So,

01:30:16.940 how does

01:30:17.500 that make

01:30:17.840 me a

01:30:18.120 white supremacist

01:30:18.980 if I'm

01:30:19.460 supporting the

01:30:20.000 brown guy?

01:30:21.840 Right?

01:30:22.380 So,

01:30:23.000 Vivek has

01:30:23.600 not only

01:30:24.100 the

01:30:24.420 communication

01:30:25.060 skills that

01:30:26.060 are unparalleled,

01:30:27.620 he's coming

01:30:28.800 from a place

01:30:29.600 that's just

01:30:30.100 the more

01:30:30.480 comfortable

01:30:30.940 place to

01:30:31.620 make the

01:30:31.940 argument.

01:30:33.480 Anybody

01:30:34.100 can make

01:30:34.520 the argument,

01:30:35.160 but we're

01:30:35.400 not all

01:30:36.060 coming from

01:30:36.600 comfortable

01:30:37.020 places.

01:30:37.860 I would

01:30:38.320 be a good

01:30:38.720 example of

01:30:39.300 that,

01:30:39.500 right?

01:30:40.080 I couldn't

01:30:40.700 run for

01:30:41.080 president and

01:30:42.640 make a DEI

01:30:43.420 argument without

01:30:44.220 half of the

01:30:45.020 country saying,

01:30:45.700 well,

01:30:45.860 you're just a

01:30:46.340 white supremacist,

01:30:47.240 so,

01:30:48.240 right?

01:30:48.860 But if

01:30:49.300 Vivek makes it,

01:30:50.040 they're going to

01:30:50.280 have to do

01:30:50.620 better.

01:30:50.920 they're going to

01:30:52.800 defend DEI

01:30:54.140 because they

01:30:55.820 can't just go

01:30:56.340 after him.

01:30:57.520 Say,

01:30:57.740 well,

01:30:57.980 you're

01:30:58.140 obviously a

01:30:58.680 white supremacist.

01:30:59.540 Okay,

01:31:00.080 why isn't this

01:31:01.000 working anymore?

01:31:03.220 So,

01:31:03.760 that's another

01:31:04.180 advantage he

01:31:04.700 has.

01:31:06.360 Now,

01:31:06.580 Vivek says he

01:31:07.380 doesn't think

01:31:07.860 that those in

01:31:09.260 charge will

01:31:09.800 let either

01:31:10.320 Trump or

01:31:11.160 Biden get

01:31:12.600 to the

01:31:12.900 finish line.

01:31:13.760 He doesn't

01:31:14.120 think either

01:31:14.560 one will get

01:31:15.300 there because

01:31:16.240 there are too

01:31:16.540 many powers

01:31:17.320 trying to

01:31:18.860 prevent it.

01:31:20.560 So,

01:31:21.160 if you're

01:31:21.540 looking for

01:31:21.920 your backup

01:31:22.460 plan,

01:31:24.360 I think

01:31:25.780 Nikki Haley

01:31:26.380 is looking

01:31:26.840 like the

01:31:27.540 insider,

01:31:29.420 deep state

01:31:30.000 military

01:31:30.560 industrial

01:31:31.080 complex

01:31:31.840 friend.

01:31:35.940 DeSantis

01:31:36.460 just sort

01:31:37.540 of disappeared.

01:31:39.680 But if

01:31:40.440 you're looking

01:31:40.700 for your

01:31:41.320 backup plan,

01:31:43.680 you might

01:31:44.640 need a

01:31:44.960 backup plan.

01:31:46.980 So,

01:31:47.320 at the

01:31:47.800 very least,

01:31:49.040 here's what

01:31:49.460 I'd ask

01:31:49.940 you to

01:31:50.200 do.

01:31:51.120 Just

01:31:51.360 become

01:31:51.680 familiar

01:31:52.180 with

01:31:52.480 Vivek's

01:31:52.940 policies.

01:31:54.600 Just

01:31:54.780 become

01:31:55.260 familiar

01:31:55.780 with them.

01:31:56.260 That's

01:31:56.440 all.

01:31:57.060 Just in

01:31:57.340 case it

01:31:57.740 becomes

01:31:59.180 necessary.

01:32:00.040 Because I

01:32:00.280 know most

01:32:00.640 of you are

01:32:00.960 just Trump

01:32:03.000 supporters,

01:32:03.700 probably.

01:32:04.940 But keep

01:32:05.460 an open

01:32:05.720 mind.

01:32:06.640 Because a

01:32:06.960 lot could

01:32:07.320 happen to

01:32:09.000 Trump that's

01:32:10.960 not good.

01:32:12.600 You know,

01:32:12.840 if Trump

01:32:13.580 is not

01:32:13.960 taken out

01:32:14.480 with law

01:32:14.960 fair or

01:32:15.520 some other

01:32:16.000 dirty trick,

01:32:16.720 you can't

01:32:17.380 imagine,

01:32:18.580 he should

01:32:18.940 win.

01:32:20.280 But there's

01:32:21.140 a lot of

01:32:21.740 dirty tricks

01:32:22.280 and a lot

01:32:22.720 of time

01:32:23.000 left.

01:32:23.700 So don't

01:32:24.160 be too

01:32:24.460 confident.

01:32:26.260 All right,

01:32:26.540 ladies and 0.98

01:32:26.920 gentlemen,

01:32:27.300 that's all I

01:32:27.720 got for you

01:32:28.120 today.

01:32:29.000 Thanks for

01:32:29.440 joining here

01:32:30.160 on YouTube.

01:32:31.840 Sorry for

01:32:32.460 my bad

01:32:33.640 timing this

01:32:34.240 morning when I

01:32:34.740 started early

01:32:35.400 and had to

01:32:35.860 try it again.

01:32:37.620 But,

01:32:37.860 yeah,

01:32:39.880 hit that

01:32:40.560 like button

01:32:41.200 and subscribe

01:32:41.980 and do all

01:32:42.900 those other

01:32:43.360 things.

01:32:43.700 I'll see

01:32:44.620 you tomorrow.

01:32:46.020 You've been

01:32:46.280 great.

01:32:47.320 Thanks.

Real Coffee with Scott Adams - December 28, 2023

Episode 2336 CWSA 12⧸28⧸23 All The News Fits In A Theme And It Isn't A Good One

Episode Stats

Summary

Transcript